text
stringlengths 2.85k
2.55M
| label
class label 11
classes |
|---|---|
Miscomputation in software: Learning to live with errors
Tomas Petriceka
a The Alan Turing Institute, London, UK
Abstract Computer programs do not always work as expected. In fact, ominous warnings about the desperate
state of the software industry continue to be released with almost ritualistic regularity. In this paper, we look
at the 60 years history of programming and at the different practical methods that software community
developed to live with programming errors.
We do so by observing a class of students discussing different approaches to programming errors. While
learning about the different methods for dealing with errors, we uncover basic assumptions that proponents
of different paradigms follow. We learn about the mathematical attempt to eliminate errors through formal
methods, scientific method based on testing, a way of building reliable systems through engineering methods,
as well as an artistic approach to live coding that accepts errors as a creative inspiration.
This way, we can explore the differences and similarities among the different paradigms. By inviting proponents of different methods into a single discussion, we hope to open potential for new thinking about errors.
When should we use which of the approaches? And what can software development learn from mathematics,
science, engineering and art?
When programming or studying programming, we are often enclosed in small communities and we take
our basic assumptions for granted. Through the discussion in this paper, we attempt to map the large and
rich space of programming ideas and provide reference points for exploring, perhaps foreign, ideas that can
challenge some of our assumptions.
ACM CCS 2012
General and reference → Surveys and overviews;
Social and professional topics → History of computing;
Keywords Miscomputation, errors, philosophy, paradigms
The Art, Science, and Engineering of Programming
Submitted
December 2, 2016
Published
April 1, 2017
doi
10.22152/programming-journal.org/2017/1/14
© Tomas Petricek
This work is licensed under a “CC BY 4.0” license.
In The Art, Science, and Engineering of Programming, vol. 1, no. 2, 2017, article 14; 24 pages.
Learning to live with errors
1
The history and classification of errors
If trials of three or four simple cases have been made, and are found to agree with
the results given by the engine, it is scarcely possible that there can be any error
among the cards [5].
The opening quote from Charles Babbage about the Analytical Engine suggests that
Babbage did not see errors as a big problem. If that was the case, the software industry
would save billions of dollars, but sadly, eradicating all software errors turned out to
be harder than expected.
In retrospect, it is curious to see how long it took early computer personnel to
realise that coding errors are a problem. One of the first people to realize that “[he]
was going to spend a good deal of [his] time finding mistakes that [he] had made in
[his] programs” was Maurice Wilkes in late 1940s [17]. However, as Mark Priestley
writes, a typical comment [circa 1949] was that of Miller, who wrote that such errors,
along with hardware faults, could be “expected, in time, to become infrequent” [41].
While hardware faults did become relatively infrequent, the same cannot be said
about coding errors.
Over the next 20 years, computers developed from a research experiment into an
ordinary scientific tool and industrial instrument. As noted by Nathan Ensmenger,
by the end of 1960s many were talking of a computing crisis. For the next “several
decades, managers, academics and governments would release warnings about the
desperate state of the software industry with ritualistic regularity” [17].
In this essay, we trace the history of errors, or miscomputations [19], in software
engineering. We look at different kinds of errors and discuss different strategies that
programmers employ for dealing with errors, taking inspiration from mathematics,
science, engineering and art. We conclude by speculating how can the industry escape
from the seeming perpetual computing crisis.
Lesson 1: Responding to the computing crisis
Teacher: To open the discussion, do you think that software engineering is suffering
from a crisis caused by coding errors? And if so, what do we need to eradicate them?
Pupil Beta: I’m not sure we can really call our discipline software engineering. As a
proper engineering discipline, we need to develop engineering standards that ensure
minimum performance, safety requirements and make sure that developing software
is a consistent and repeatable process. The black art of programming has to make a
way for the science of software engineering.1
Pupil Alpha: This is an admirable goal, but building software is not repeatable in the
same way as, say, building bridges. In software, requirements are always changing.
We should see software as craftsmanship and emphasize skills of developers.
1
The quote is adapted from the calls for the professionalization of programmers that appeared
around the time of the NATO Conference in 1968 [17]
14-2
Tomas Petricek
The only way to make software better is to value individuals and interactions over
processes and tools 2 !
Pupil Tau: Coding errors must be avoided at all costs. If a program contains an error,
we should not even call it a program! But you are both going about it the wrong way –
even with the best craftsmans and processes, there is always a chance of human error.
We need to build on mathematical foundations and write provably correct software.
Building on strong theoretical foundations, ideas like dependently typed programming
are the way toward eradicating all errors. Striving for anything less is unethical!
Pupil Alpha: This might work for the factorial function or Fibonacci numbers, but
real software systems are not so simple. When you start building a real system, you
do not even have a full specification, let alone a formal one.
What really matters is how we discover the specification and this is where testdriven methodology can help [7]. You turn requirements into tests, discovering the
specification and writing software that adheres to it at the same time.
Pupil Epsilon: Oh, come on! You both really think you can eliminate all errors? Take
any complex distributed system as an example. So many things can go wrong – one
of your machines runs out of memory, your server receives an unexpected request.
Even a cosmic ray may flip a bit in your memory if your data centre is large enough!
The path to dependable software is to learn to live with errors.
Pupil Tau: I would like to object; we can accommodate for all of these situations in
our proofs, but I see there is only little time left and I’m curious if Omega can direct
our discussion back into a more sensible direction.
Pupil Omega: Yo, I tell you, errors are fun!
Teacher: That is an interesting position Omega, but I think the class needs more
explanation. What exactly do you mean?
Pupil Omega: I was playing in a club yesterday. I accidentally put on a wrong sample
and it turned out to be much better. If you make an error, you might be surprised.
And if Tau thinks it is unethical, wouldn’t it be just as unethical as to limit our method
of discovery? Penicillin was discovered by the kind of accident that Tau wants to ban!
Teacher: It does seem that after more than 60 years, errors are still an important
concern of the software industry and there is much disagreement about how to live
with them. Perhaps it will be easier to expand on the different positions once we
consider recent infamous examples of concrete coding errors.
Lesson 2: From Y2K to the Knight Capital glitch
Teacher: Let us now consider the different strategies for dealing with errors using a
number of case studies. The first one is the infamous Y2K bug. This was caused by the
2
Alpha paraphrases the position of the craftsmanship movement [33], which has been linked
with art and contrasted with the engineering attitude [43].
14-3
Learning to live with errors
fact that many old programs stored only the last two digits of a year in a date and so
adding one day to 31/12/1999 produced a date that could be interpreted as 1/1/2000,
but also as 1/1/1900.3
As a concrete instance, my bank statement on 1/1/2000 reported that $8617 disappeared from my savings! Fortunately, they returned my money on the next day...
Omega: Ouch! Despite all the Y2K craze,4 I had the impression that the bug caused
only relatively small number of problems. It is an interesting case where the potential
issue was discovered before it actually occurred. Yet, it was surprisingly hard to fix.
Beta: I can see how the bug in the banking system could have happened. I bet the
specification was correct and stated how to calculate the compound interest for a
given number of years, but due to a sloppy encoding of years, the system calculated
the interest based not on +1 year, but based on -99 years. 5
Omega: This is a case where formal proofs are not going to help. You can prove that
your calculations and algorithms are correct, but when it comes down to metal, years
won’t be idealized natural numbers, but only two digits to save memory space!
Tau: That would only be the case if you were using program proofs in an informal
way, but if we talk about proving programs correct, we must not make any idealizing
simplifications. We must prove properties of the actual implementation – the bug was
an incompleteness in the specification. The specification must be detailed enough not
to leave room for any ambiguity, such as how are the dates going to be represented.
Alpha: I cannot easily think of a theorem to prove here. If the property we prove is
that the system correctly calculates the return on investment using the compound
interest formula for a given number of years, that still does not prevent us from
accidentally calculating it for -99 years...
Teacher: Finding properties to prove is an important question. We will return to it
in Lesson 6. To find further interesting questions to discuss, let’s consider another
well-known bug. In August 2012, the trading firm Knight Capital lost $440m in less
than 45 minutes due to an erroneous deployment of their software.
The company removed outdated code from the software and re-purposed a flag that
was used to trigger it. It then deployed a new version of the software on all servers
except for one – and turned on the flag. This executed the new routine on the updated
servers, but it triggered the outdated code on the one server running the old version,
causing the system to issue millions of erroneous trades [46].
Omega: I cannot believe it took Knight Capital 45 minutes to turn off the malfunctioning server! The lesson here is clear. You should design the system to make such
errors immediately visible and you should be able to quickly manually intervene. You
3
Unlike a modern data scientist, our class is lucky enough that it does not need to consider
different ways of writing days and months in a date!
4
How media reported on the Y2K bug has been well-documented by Davies [14]
5
Beta makes a correct guess, $8617 is what you lose when you assume 2% interest rate on
initial investment $10000 over -99 years.
14-4
Tomas Petricek
should be able to stop incorrect trading just like you can stop a dissonant chord that
you accidentally play in live music performance.
Epsilon: I can see how a manual coding intervention could correct the error promptly,
but why not avoid it in the first place? The scenario sounds exactly like the situation
for which Erlang and its “let it crash” [3] approach has been designed! Erlang has
been used in telecommunications for systems that need to run for years without an
outage and are updated on the fly.
Rather than re-purposing a flag, you would simply add a new kind of message. If
an old system was running on one of the servers, it would crash when it receives a
message it cannot handle – and it would get restarted by a supervisor process while
all the updated servers would continue working fine.
Tau: If the system is programmed to automatically recover, then I do not think we are
still talking about errors. But I must admit, I find it a very inelegant approach...
Teacher: The case of Knight Capital revealed two more important questions that
we should discuss in future lessons. First, I would like to return to the idea of live
intervention in Lesson 5. Second, the Erlang approach of incorporating some degree
of error tolerance is an interesting alternative and we’ll return to it in Lesson 10.
Now, let’s discuss one more case study. In January 2016, Google Translate caused
an embarrassing diplomatic incident. When translating from Ukrainian to Russian, it
started translating Russia as “Mordor” and Sergey Lavrov (Russia’s foreign minister)
as “sad little horse” [6]. The error was introduced automatically – it mirrored language
used by some Ukrainians following Moscow’s annexation of Crimea in 2014.
Tau: I object, this is not a real error!
Lesson 3: Classifying kinds of miscomputation
Teacher: We uncovered an interesting issue last time – is the unexpected behaviour
of Google Translate actually an error? To answer this, perhaps we can start by trying
to understand what kinds of errors or miscomptuations [19] are there.
Beta: Let me try. First, there are simple slips where your idea was right and you tried to
encode it in the right way, but you made a syntax error, a typo or, say, a copy-and-paste
error. Then there are failures where you had the right idea but encoded (some part
of) it poorly. Finally, mistakes are the kinds of errors where you made an error when
thinking through the specification.6
Tau: Knight Capital glitch would then be a failure, while Y2K bug is a mistake because
nobody expected software to still run in the year 2000. However, Google Translate
simply followed the specification of its machine learning algorithms...
Alpha: That might be the case if the specification said “run this deep neural network
learning algorithm on data scraped from Ukrainian internet”, but I doubt that is
6
Beta is paraphrasing categorization of miscomputation by Primiero and Fresco [19, 42]
14-5
Learning to live with errors
the case. We must see programs in the wider socio-technological perspective.7 You
wouldn’t want an accident like that to cause a war...
Omega: I bet that Tau will now claim that programs cannot miscompute,8 because
they execute their program code and that is what they are supposed to do! The actual
specification of Google Translate must have been “do a good and accurate translation”.
Tau: I would be happy to say that programs cannot miscompute, but I accept that
coding errors are a more general notion. Still, “do an accurate translation” is more of
a marketing slogan than a specification.
Teacher: Can we perhaps better understand the nature of the error if we consider
what Google Translate team did in order to address it?
Alpha: I can imagine two alternatives. If they had manual control over the training
data, then they probably just removed the offending text from the dataset. If the training data is automatically collected, then they probably had to modify the behaviour
of the scraping or training algorithm...
Beta: Now I can see why Tau says this was not an error. If we treat the training data
just as one of the program inputs and the error was caused by inappropriate training
data, then the error was neither failure nor a mistake. However, if Google had to
modify their algorithm, then I would characterize the error as a mistake.
Epsilon: Are you suggesting that we can only decide whether the behaviour was a
mistake if we know what Google did in order to address it? This is quite strange!
Beta: If we want to treat training data as separate from the program, then we need
to think about the specification for the data too – training data is just too important
in machine learning. Translating Russia as Mordor is an amusing story, but there are
more dangerous biases that poorly chosen training dataset can cause!
Epsilon: I think that another useful lesson from the Google Translate case is that
you never quite know when your specification is complete. As new unexpected situations arise, your specification has to evolve too. The fact that translating Russia
as Mordor is not an “accurate translation” only becomes apparent once it happens.
Interestingly, mathematicians went through exactly the same process when trying to
define polyhedron! 9
Teacher: It seems that the situation with mistakes is quite subtle. Now, can we at least
agree on slips and failures? Or is it equally hard to recognize an incorrect encoding
of a correct specification?
7
As discussed by Northrop et al. [38], challenges of ultra-large-scale systems often need to
be seen through this wider perspective.
8
A discussion along these lines followed in response to Primiero and Fresco [19]; Dewhurst
[15] argues that design errors should not be seen as miscomputation and Floridi et al. [18]
discusses whether software can be seen as artifacts that can malfunction.
9
Epsilon refers to the concept of concept stretching of Lakatos [31].
14-6
Tomas Petricek
Omega: I would probably agree on slips, but the idea of failures makes an incorrect
assumption that software can always have perfect and clear specification. A perceived
failure can equally be a sign that you found an interesting complex scenario that you
did not properly consider in your specification.
Alpha: In test-driven development, this would be the case where you add a new
test case to clarify the specification. Strictly speaking, if you treat your tests as a
specification, then you cannot have failures and all errors are either slips or mistakes.
That is an interesting and for me quite unexpected consequence of the definition...
Omega: Another issue with our definition is that many interesting kinds of software
cannot even have a clear specification. This is the case in live coded music or generative
art where errors may turn out to be your most interesting pieces of work.10 Outside of
art, a data scientist or a data journalist trying to find an interesting story in a leaked
data dump does not, at first, know what exactly she might be looking for!
2
Understanding programming paradigms through errors
As we have seen, the definition and classification of errors varies across different
communities. This is also the case when dealing with errors. Not only do different
groups follow different approaches to address errors, but their criteria for what can be
considered a solution differ too. In philosophy of science, such sets of incommensurable
assumptions are known as research programmes or paradigms.11
Thinking about coding errors gives us a new way of thinking about different programming paradigms and about the basic assumptions they do not question. While
our class can reconcile some of the views (e.g. types and tests), we find that errors
draw a bigger dividing line when trying to understand what a program is.
Lesson 4: Maintenance as part of the programming process
Teacher: According to some studies, from 1960s on, software maintenance has
represented between 50% to 70% of total expenditure on software [17]. This is in part
due to fixing bugs, but perhaps more importantly also due to required modification in
response to the changes in the business environment. The Y2K bug is a good example
of a change in the environment – the year change that was perhaps unexpected when
software was originally written suddenly became important at the end of 1990s.
To open this lesson, is software maintenance something we have to do because
we are unable to produce software without errors, or is it an inevitable part of the
software development process?
10
Some of the work by Anders Hoff collects interesting pieces produced accidentally by a
buggy generative algorithm [25]
11
This is an over-simplification, but for the purpose of this article, we use research programmes
[30] and research paradigms [29] in a similar sense.
14-7
Learning to live with errors
Alpha: The test-driven approach to software development supports both the initial
development and maintenance. You write tests to specify the behaviour. With the Y2K
bug, you would simply add a new test, fix possible failures and deploy a new version.
Teacher: This is an interesting perspective on errors. Are you not only accepting
that there are errors in the program, but even propose to incorporate them into the
program development life-cycle?
Tau: Excuse me, but I think we should not be confusing what a program is with how
it is created. A program is just a linguistic entity that you can analyse for correctness
and run. How it is written is not a concern of our present discussion! Once we learn
how to construct correct programs, no maintenance will be needed.
Teacher: Treating program as a linguistic entity is exactly the kind of assumption
that defines a scientific research programme...
Omega: And I think it is fundamentally flawed assumption! The fact that more than
half of costs involve maintenance only supports this. The Y2K bug is an obvious issue
in retrospect, but I can see how everyone missed it in 1980s. The environment in
which software exists evolves and maintenance is more about adapting to the change
than about fixing errors.
In other words, programming is not a task of constructing a linguistic entity, but
rather a process of working interactively with the programming environment, using
text simply as one possible interface.12
Beta: This reminds me of a banking system in Smalltalk that I worked on in the
1990s. In Smalltalk, you create software by interacting directly with the environment.
The program runs at the same time as you are creating it. This was useful for rapid
feedback, but once the system was working, you did not continue to live code it, except
sometimes when it went wrong and you needed to investigate and fix the error.
Omega: But the decision when to watch the system and when to leave it alone was
only yours! In live coded music, you want to interact with the system during the whole
performance. In other applications, you interact more frequently in an early phase
and less frequently in a later phase. But you still need to be able to interact!
Lesson 5: Programming as human-computer interaction
Teacher: Let us spend more time on the idea of seeing programming as an interaction
with the programming environment. We already talked about it in the context of live
coded performance and Smalltalk programming. Those are great examples, but can
we find more examples of this approach to programming?
Omega: Going back to the Y2K bug, live coding is actually what most companies did
in response! Yes, they tried to fix possible bugs in advance, but in the end, they had a
programmer on-site over the midnight to fix any problems as they happen.
12
Omega is paraphrasing the definitions of Algol and Smalltalk research programmes [41]
14-8
Tomas Petricek
Similarly, when mitigating a hacking attempt, you should be able to connect to the
system and live code a defense [11]. Sadly, most systems just did not have a very good
live coding interface to make such interaction possible.
Teacher: Is there anything that programming can learn from live coding then?
Epsilon: I have no interest in live coded music, but I see one similarity. What Omega
described sounds like working with a REPL environment in Python or Racket.
There, you also type commands and run them immediately. If you get an error message, you can immediately correct yourself. REPL is no doubt “serious programming”
but you still would not create a whole complex system just in REPL.
Teacher: Should we then agree that Omega’s live coded music does not teach us
much about professional software development, or are there other areas of software
that are more similar to live coding?
Epsilon: I have one more example, but again, it is not what I normally think of as
programming. Doing data science using tools like Matlab or R also feels like live
coding. You also issue commands, observe the results and correct errors. Error like
typos are immediately obvious, but you can also live code experiments to test more
complex machine learning algorithms such as the one translating Russia as Mordor.
Tau: Following the same logic, you could claim that interactive theorem proving in
Coq is also live coding with errors, because you do write code interactively until
you satisfy your proof obligations. But unfinished proof is clearly not an error. Just a
process of constructing a provably correct program.
Alpha: I’m not sure about theorem proving, but test-driven development (TDD)
can probably be seen as a form of live-coding too. A good test runner runs in the
background and shows the failing tests immediately as you are writing your code to
provide rapid feedback.
Omega: This is exactly how live coding works! In TDD or data science, you are trying
to make errors more visible so that you can quickly correct them. It is the same as live
coded music where errors are immediately apparent. When you play a wrong note in
a live coded performance, you will immediately hear that.
I think there are two main lessons for software development. First, we need to
abolish this artificial distinction between a phase when software is created and a phase
when it is autonomously running. As the costs of maintenance showed, programming
is almost never done. Second, we need to code in a way that make the errors visible.
Just like you can immediately hear a wrong note, you should be able to hear or see
an incorrect execution of a program, perhaps in some built-in monitoring tools.
Tau: Well, now I see what you are trying to achieve, but it gives me a headache!
If we wanted to guarantee correctness of such systems and account for all possible
interactions, we would have to shift from proofs about static programs to proofs about
interactions.
I’m not saying it is impossible. It might even be an interesting research problem!
But I would very much prefer to solve the easier task of proving correctness of static
programs first.
14-9
Learning to live with errors
Lesson 6: Achieving correctness through tests and proofs
Teacher: Let us go back to the idea of programs as linguistic entities. Does this
perspective help us eliminate coding errors?
Tau: Absolutely! A program is essentially a formal language term and this lets us utilize
the resources of logic in order to increase the confidence in correctness of programs.13
Instead of testing or debugging a program, one should prove that a program meets its
specification. Then there will be no doubt that our software is correct and serves its
purpose.
Epsilon: I like reading papers about programming language theory and I do enjoy
an elegant proof, but I do not see how you could write proofs about software system
that has hundreds of thousands of lines of code.
Tau: For reliable software engineering, we need to make proof an inherent part of the
development process. Thanks to the Curry-Howard isomorphism, proofs are types.
This means that all the amazing tools developed in logic are readily available in
programming.
Alpha: I can understand why people like types. They can be useful for avoiding basic
kinds of errors. But the problem is that types do not capture the full complexity of
software requirements.
You still need to write your user stories and to make sure they keep working,
you need some form of testing. And if you will have tests anyway, why restrict the
expressive power of a language with types and not use tests as the way of ensuring
program correctness?
Tau: Substituting tests for proofs is never going to be enough. With tests, you are just
showing the absence of certain errors, not proving your program correct.14
In modern dependently typed languages like Idris and Agda, you can express the
full program specification just in terms of types. And then we will finally be able to
write provably correct software!
Teacher: I find it interesting that we are shifting the focus from program code to the
properties that specify what the program does...
Epsilon: At first, I thought all this talk about proofs is pointless, but now that you
mention properties, I think there might be something useful here.
Finding properties about your program is equally important if you are writing
property-based tests with tools like QuickCheck [13], which then check that a property
13
Historically, this position first appeared with the Algol language. To quote Priestley [41]:
One of the goals of the Algol research programme was to utilize the resources of logic to
increase the confidence that it was possible to have in the correctness of a program. As
McCarthy [35] had put it, “[i]nstead of debugging a program, one should prove that it
meets its specifications, and this proof should be checked by a computer program”.
14
Tau is paraphrasing Dijkstra’s famous quote: “Program testing can be used to show the
presence of bugs, but never to show their absence.” [16]
14-10
Tomas Petricek
holds for partially randomly generated inputs. With random testing tools, you can
focus more on finding as many useful properties as you can, rather than on writing
a long-winded proof for every single one of them. This is a very efficient way for
eradicating what we called failures in our earlier discussion.
Lesson 7: Specifying program properties
Teacher: Going back to the Y2K bug, the Knight Capital glitch and the Google Translate issue, can you think of properties that we can prove or check with random testing?
Alpha: In case of banking system and Y2K, the test suite could include a check for
a property that adding calculated interest to a savings account never decreases the
total balance. The Y2K bug would be easily discovered and eliminated before it could
happen!
Tau: Excuse me, but this is no way of finding theorems about programs! You just picked
one random property that you believe should hold, but this is not a methodology for
constructing provably correct software.
Instead, we need to start from small correct building blocks. We need to go back to
the basics and define what a date is and what are the properties of functions operating
on dates. Assuming n is a function that returns the next date and ≥ is the ordering
on dates, we want to prove monotonicity stating that ∀d.n(d) ≥ d .
Omega: I wonder how this accounts for leap seconds... I’m not saying it cannot be
done, but if we get stuck discussing monotonicity of dates, how are we ever going to
develop something as complex as banking system? And isn’t the specification going to
become terribly complex?
Tau: Today, most people who write software assume that the costs of formal program
verification outweigh the benefits and that fixing bugs later is cheaper than investing
into correctness from the very start.15
I agree we still have a long way to go, but many research projects show that this
can be done. For example, CompCert [32] is a verified C compiler with a machinechecked proof that the generated executable code behaves exactly as prescribed by
the semantics of the source program.
Teacher: Is there something that we can learn from CompCert about finding properties to prove about large systems?
Tau: Unlike the property about not decreasing total balance that Alpha suggested
earlier, the property that is proved in CompCert is a complete specification. The types
specify that the compilation preserves semantics of programs between the formally
specified source language and formally specified machine code.
15
Tau is paraphrasing the introduction from a recent book on certified programming [12]
14-11
Learning to live with errors
This means that you can infer the correct implementation from the type. 16 In
Coq, this did not happen automatically, but with recent development in Idris [9],
you will just need to write a sufficiently detailed specification using types and the
implementation will be inferred for you.
Epsilon: And the circle is closed! You are proposing to shift all the complexity of
programming from writing a solution to writing a specification of the solution. I do
not see how this is any safer.
In today’s languages, we have to analyze the implementation and we invent new
abstractions and constructs to make this easier. In your dependently typed future, we
will have to analyze the equally complex specifications and we will presumably be
inventing new abstractions and constructs to make this easier!
Omega: I have to admit, we came to an interesting point here. Is it easier to write a
correct concrete implementation or a correct abstract specification?
I can see how writing the specification might be easier for C compiler. For a business
application or any more creative use of computer, a specification in terms of properties
will be harder to understand than a concrete implementation in a high-level language.
3
Mathematics, science, engineering and art
Through the discussion in the previous section, we discovered several ways of thinking
about programs. We have also seen that if you take one of them as granted, it is
hard to understand what proponents of other perspectives are saying – the different
assumptions forming the basis of a different paradigm make other approaches illogical.
In this section, we try to relate the different ways of thinking about programs
with different forms of human activity. It turns out that seeing programs as linguistic
entities has much in common with mathematics and testing can learn from philosophy
of science. Viewing a program as a long-running system is best seen as engineering
and focusing on the interactions in programming can draw useful ideas from art.
Lesson 8: Learning from philosophy of science and mathematics
Teacher: Just like errors are an interesting topic for computing, so are experimental failures an interesting topic when discussing science. Can we learn something
interesting about computing if we see errors as experimental failures?
Tau: A theory is scientific if it can be falsified, 17 but we can never prove it true. I see
an obvious parallel with the test-driven development methodology. Tests can falsify
a program, but they can never prove that it is correct. Testing does not increase our
16
This is a common view in the dependently-typed community. There is no canonical reference
making this exact point, but the work of McBride and McKinna [34] is close.
17
Tau follows the Popperian view of scientific theories [40], which has been largely influential,
but can be challenged from many perspectives [10]
14-12
Tomas Petricek
confidence about program correctness, just like a scientific experiment that does not
fail is not showing that a scientific theory is correct.
Teacher: So, is there really no information in the fact that a scientific theory keeps
escaping refutation? Or that a software system passes a growingly comprehensive
test suite?
Epsilon: I think that even in science, not everybody agrees with the strict Popperian
view. If a scientific theory passes a test and makes a correct prediction that could have
disproved it, the probability that it is correct increases. Running the exact same test
twice does not improve the probability, but I think that a new test does.
Alpha: I get it now! It’s like in the Bayes’ theorem. There is a prior probability that
the software is correct, possibly based on the team behind it. Testing the software
then provides new evidence and the Bayes’ theorem prescribes how probabilities are
to be changed in light of this new evidence.18
The fact that running the exact same test twice does not improve the probability of
correctness, is already accounted for by the Bayes’ theorem. So what we need is a
way of finding relevant tests that do increase the probability.
Teacher: It seems that we can account for an increasing confidence in program
correctness through testing by using the Bayesian approach to philosophy of science!
Tau, do you agree?
Tau: That might be right, but what it shows is the limits of relying on tests. Perhaps you can increase probability, but you will never be absolutely certain. However,
programming is more like mathematics where proofs can give you exactly that –
absolute certainty. Experimentation is good in areas where we cannot have deductive
knowledge,19 but why settle for probability if you can have a proof?
Epsilon: Let me quote Imre Lakatos, who once said that “when a powerful new
method emerges, the problems it cannot talk about are ignored” [31]. This is one
danger of focusing on proofs – suddenly it becomes impossible to talk about important
problems that cannot be explained through proofs. For example, what is the most
intuitive way of modelling a distributed system? Surely, using the right intuitive
programming model is crucial for writing correct software!
Teacher: Well, even if we see programming more as mathematics, is achieving
correctness the only goal of proofs?
Omega: Proofs aren’t there to convince you that something is true. They are there to
show why it is true [4]. Even more interestingly, they sometimes play the same role as
errors in live coding performance – they lead into unexplored territory of mathematics
where we may even find different fundamental questions! [22]
Teacher: Can proofs about programs play this role?
18
19
Bayesian epistemology of science [10] is based on similar reasoning
As noted by Hacking [23], “we find prejudices in favour of theory as far back as there is
institutionalized science.”
14-13
Learning to live with errors
Epsilon: I had a look at some Coq programs and I am convinced that the proofs
are true, but I doubt they fulfill the explanatory role. Reading a sequence of tactic
invocations is definitely harder than reading an implementation of the same problem
in a simple language.
Tau: I agree that Coq proofs can be complex, but they do have explanatory role. After
all, in CompCert, the proof proceeds by a sequence of steps that translate source
code in C into source code in a number of intermediary languages. Each of these
translations preserves the semantics. The proof essentially describes the architecture
of the compiler!
Omega: I can see how the CompCert proof reveals the problem decomposition, but
I still doubt this approach can reveal truly new and unexplored ideas. Perhaps the
problem is that constructive proofs like those about programs just have to follow more
rigid structure. In mathematics, proof by contradiction can introduce unexpected
creative twists that you can hardly get in proofs about programs.
Lesson 9: Errors as a source of artistic creativity
Teacher: Talking about sources of creative inspiration, Omega, you claimed earlier
that errors are fun and can lead to new discoveries. Can you clarify what you mean?
Omega: An error in the performance of classical music occurs when the performer
plays a note that is not written on the page. In genres that are not notated so closely,
there are no wrong notes – only notes that are more or less appropriate [8]. A musical
live coding performance is also not closely notated. You issue commands. Some of
them are more appropriate and some of them are less appropriate.
Going back to our classification of errors, a slip such as syntax error rarely produces
inspiring unexpected results. Failures and especially mistakes where you do not fully
think through the consequences of your idea often lead to interesting creative moments.
I imagine data scientists using REPL experience the same feelings when things do not
go as expected!
Teacher: This is talking about more interactive flavor of programming, but do errors
also have a useful role in more traditional software development?
Beta: I think so, but we need to consider the entire software development process,
including clarification of the specification and maintenance. I believe that errors often
show areas where we need to clarify specification.
Epsilon: In Erlang, we say that an error is a situation in which the programmer
does not know how the program should correctly react, which seems to agree with
what Beta is saying! Of course, in Erlang, the answer is to kill the process and let the
supervisor recover from the error [3].
That way, an error caused by a rare interplay of multiple systems becomes just a
failure that the system can automatically recover from, without turning into a mistake
that programmers would need to immediately address.
14-14
Tomas Petricek
Omega: I did not think of that, but I think this perfectly explains why artistic inspiration
is important for programming! Seeing software development as mathematics or
science makes us want to carefully control the process and impose tight constraints to
make it reproducible. In contrast, artistic process tolerates or even welcomes a variety
of inputs and works to produce the best result given the situations encountered while
executing the process [21].
Tau: I’m not sure I follow. How is reproducibility a bad thing?
Omega: Of course, reproducibility is nice, but it is a chimera. There is much more
variety in software engineering than in traditional engineering disciplines and requirements are always changing. An artistic process can adapt to very poorly stated
requirements or even no requirements at all [21].
Beta: But Omega, do you not agree that the attempts to turn our discipline from what
I earlier called “black art of programming” into an engineering discipline contributed
to the quality of software that we build today?
Omega: It very likely did, but we can’t say it’s helped the quality of design much [21]
and this is why we keep making the same errors!
In live coding you can very visibly improve through practice and the progress is
clear to see. Perhaps we need to look at how artistic work makes such improvements
possible? I suspect it might, in part, be thanks to the interaction with directly apparent
errors and their unexpected consequences!
Lesson 10: Engineering, or how did software get so reliable without proof?
Teacher: The fact that we have this lecture series clearly shows that errors are still
an important concern, but going back to what Beta said in the previous lecture, do
you think that the quality of software that we build has been improving over, say, the
last 60 years?
Epsilon: Looking at the history, it is fascinating to see all the regular warnings about
the desperate state of the software industry. There is an interesting dichotomy: on
the one hand, software is one of the largest and fastest-growing sectors of the U.S.
economy; on the other hand, its reputation continues to be marked by perceptions of
crisis and failure [17].
Tau: I’m often surprised how did software get so reliable without proofs.20 Perhaps it
is because solid engineering does help to limit the damage caused by broken software
that we continue to produce.
That said, software is either correct, or not correct. Just like in mathematics you
either have a proof or you do not, in software there is no such thing as “only slightly
20
This very same question has been asked by a proponent of formal methods and the Algol
research programme [24]
14-15
Learning to live with errors
broken”.21 And so I agree with all of those who think that our industry has a serious
problem to solve.
Beta: I disagree. The binary distinction between correct and incorrect software may
be nice theory, but it does not reflect the reality. In practice, software might not be
perfect, but can still be acceptable [44]. I believe this is what Epsilon is arguing
for with Erlang’s supervision model too, but the same ideas can matter when saving
energy [39] or processing big data [37].
Epsilon: Absolutely! And even if we can make all the software components provably
correct, we will still have the same problem – take large data centres or distributed
systems in telecommunications as examples. At that scale, you need to account for
unexpected hardware failures.
There will always be errors and letting the program crash and then recover automatically through supervision is an effective way of addressing that. However, I do
like some of Omega’s ideas about live coding and I think they can be used to make
our monitoring and recovery tools better.
Teacher: It seems that there must be some useful lessons from other engineering
disciplines, say, civil engineering...
Beta: The key idea in engineering is safety factor, which measures how much stronger
a system is than it usually needs to be. A civil engineer will calculate the worst
case load for a beam, but then make it ten times stronger. Such over-engineering is
extremely effective and is even required by law for bridge building.
The idea of safety factors is something I would like to see in software engineering
too. Perhaps not required by law, but certainly required by the code of ethics of any
reputable software engineering organization [2].
Epsilon: I never thought about it in such a formal sense, so I have to admit, I do
not even know how to calculate such safety factor for supervisor-based distributed
applications...
Tau: Now you got me interested. The safety factor for a bridge can be calculated based
on the expected load, but this assumes certain linearity. Increasing the strength of
material twice provides a safety factor of 2. Software systems involve feedback loops
or non-linearity where safety factor of 2 requires tenfold over-engineering.
What we need is a theory of stability, or perhaps a type system that can guarantee
that certain amount of supervision does, indeed, provide the required safety factor!
Teacher: Judging by the way you are talking about the idea, Tau, it almost seems
that Epsilon convinced you to accept errors! Or am I mistaken?
Tau: But we are not talking about errors here at all! All the so called “invalid states”
that Epsilon proposes to handle by supervision and recovery are now perfectly valid
and expected! It is just a different way of expressing your program, but as all the ones
we talked about earlier, it does eliminate all errors from the software system.
21
Tau is paraphrasing Erik Meijer’s article [36]
14-16
Tomas Petricek
4
What can software development learn through errors
Programming is not just one of mathematics, science, engineering or art. We can see
it through all these four perspectives and each of them provides different inspiration.
We have seen that each of the different paradigms for thinking about errors is more
inclined to take inspiration from a different kind of human activity.
It might seem that these four approaches define incommensurable paradigms, but
focusing our discussion around errors gives us a common central point that everyone
can understand, even though in a different and somewhat incompatible way.22
In the last section, we will explore how thinking about errors gives us a new
perspective on the world of software engineering. First, we consider how different
programming styles align with different ways of thinking about errors. Second, we
try to characterize computing problems based on what approach to errors is more
appropriate.
Lesson 11: The world according to errors
Teacher: Now that we discussed errors from many different perspectives in the last
10 lessons, perhaps the best way to start the last lesson is by naively repeating our
initial question. What are errors and what can we do to build better software?
Beta: The simple answer is that correct software corresponds to its specification, but
we have seen that there are many issues with this answer. A complete specification
is hard to obtain, evolves during the life-cycle and for some systems, it may be very
complex or even non-existent.
Tau: I think our earlier classification of different kinds of errors is useful here. I believe
that formal methods can help us eliminate all failures and slips. Dealing with mistakes
will be harder. They happen when we have gaps in our specification and, even in
mathematics, you have to rely on intuition to guarantee that you are proving the right
theorem.
Epsilon: I agree that dealing with failures is easier. Erlang programmers are used to
living with failures and you could even say that we deliberately turn some mistakes
into failures! As I mentioned, the mantra is “if you do not know what to do, let it
crash!” This tells you to turn gaps in the specification, or mistakes, into failures, or
crashes, that the supervisor process can deal with.
Beta: It is curious to see that Erlang encourages turning mistakes into failures. I always
thought that in a poorly designed system, mistakes caused by unclear specification
will be exhibited as technical failures.
22
In sociology, the term boundary object [45] refers to objects that are understood by multiple
communities and allow transfer of knowledge between them.
14-17
Learning to live with errors
This also suggests we may need to be careful about over-engineering. It works well
for failures caused by genuine errors in encoding correct specification, but failures
that are indication of design mistakes can rarely be fixed by, say, restarting.
Alpha: It is interesting that you both are willing to accept failures. As I mentioned
before, if we see tests in test-driven development as a specification, then there are
no failures in TDD. The whole point of the methodology is to help us discover the
specification and avoid mistakes.
Epsilon: I have seen way too many heated arguments between people arguing for
types and people arguing for tests and now you are tell me that types and tests are
about different kinds of errors? As Tau says, types help you eliminate failures and
Alpha now says that tests are mainly about discovering specification and avoiding
mistakes! Perhaps this explains why many people use tests and types happily together.
Omega: I am not surprised. People are similarly confused about live coding and
types. Live coded music or interactive data science can be perfectly well done in
programming languages with types. Types help you avoid failures, but do not prevent
you from making interesting mistakes that cause defamiliarization [20] which is a
valuable source of creativity!
Lesson 12: Learning to live with errors
Teacher: There is yet another way to look at the problem of errors. Would it be
reasonable to accept some degree of errors in business applications and try to build
fully specified and provably correct software only for mission critical systems?
Beta: This fits nicely with our earlier discussion about acceptability. A business
application is acceptable even when you occasionally need to click some button twice,
but acceptable medical software needs to work reliably.
Epsilon: We talked about the difficulties with finding properties to prove though. In
fact, the traditional division between “mission critical” systems that must be formally
verified and “business applications” where some errors are acceptable is misleading!
Instead, we should think about property-based systems whose behaviour is easier to
describe as a property or a theorem and behaviour-based systems whose behaviour is
better described as concrete code. For the first, we need to get the specification right
and then we can use property-based testing or even dependently-typed languages
that infers the implementation. For the latter, we need to build high-level languages
that make the behavior they encode as easy to understand as possible.
Tau: I accept that formally specifying complex systems might be hard, but in case of
mission critical systems it would be unethical to give up. We should try to prove at
least some aspects correct, if only to increase our own understanding and confidence.
Alpha: I can see how you can understand the system better if you try to create a
minimal mathematical model, but didn’t we agree that small models that ignore many
details, like the representation of years, are never going to guarantee correctness?
14-18
Tomas Petricek
Teacher: Could we perhaps draw the dividing line between what we formalize and
what we omit in a different way?
Tau: Good question. We could instead try to structure the system into multiple layers!
A smaller low layer would then be formally verified. The higher layer could be built
on top of the lower layer and so the properties guaranteed by the low layer would
hold, even if the complexity of the higher layer made it hard to make any formal
statements about that part.
Omega: In general, I agree that a lower layer needs to be more correct than higher
layer. But even with a proof, I think we cannot get it absolutely right 23 and we need
other mechanisms to address potential errors. Sometimes, a supervision model like
that advocated by Epsilon might be good enough, but ultimately, you will always
need manual intervention in some cases.
Tau: Are you suggesting that programmers need to be readily available and watch
their program all the time? Surely, nobody can actually work in this way!
Omega: Quite the opposite. The DevOps movement [26] is, in many ways, doing
exactly that! It encourages close collaboration between development and operations
teams to enable automation and frequent releases.
You can see that as live coding the whole deployment environment, albeit with very
poor tools! Rather than having programming environments that have been designed to
support manual intervention like Smalltalk, DevOps teams rely on ad-hoc monitoring
tools and have limited ways for direct interactions. We need to finally accept that
software is a living system and build tools accordingly. I suppose this goes back to not
treating programs as just linguistic entities...
Tau: There is one thing I still do not understand about the idea of live intervention
though. How can you react quickly enough? In the Knight Capital glitch, it took 45
minutes and perhaps you could live code a fix in minutes, but is that ever going to be
fast enough?
Using your favourite analogy with music – a manual intervention, like a guitarist
lifting his finger from a discordant note [8] will have reaction time a fraction of a
second. Significantly shorter than any live coder can ever hope...
Omega: Yes, that is true, but live coding does not mean just typing code so that you
fix an error. You can also live code your environment, to make quick reactions easier. A
quick intervention then gives you enough time to think and decide on the best course
of action. In case of live coded music, we do this using flexible interfaces like emacs
and monome,24 but there is no reason why the same ideas would not work in other
environments.
Epsilon: Quite intriguing! This idea of fast and slow ways of reacting reminds me of
Kahneman’s two modes of thought [27]. The fast system is automatic, instinctive and
23
A recent work [28] discovered errors in nine out of nine academic papers presenting a
formal model, two of which were mechanized.
24
The idea is inspired by the performance of the Meta-eX group [1]
14-19
Learning to live with errors
emotional while the slow system is more effortful, deliberative and logical. Through
deliberate training and practice, you can train your fast system to react differently. So
perhaps our new model is even getting close to how the human thought works!
5
Summary: Escaping the crisis narrative
In this paper, we discussed a wide range of ideas about programming through the
perspective of program errors or miscomputations. This point of view provides a new
way of defining programming paradigms and thinking about software more generally.
Because of the ubiquitous crisis narrative that is persistent in our industry, this point
of view might be more revealing than when considering traditional programming
paradigms such as functional or object-oriented programming.
This work was supported by The Alan Turing Institute under the
EPSRC grant EP/N510129/1. I would like to thank to fellow members of the Revolution
& Beers Cambridge group, namely Dominic Orchard, Sam Aaron, Antranig Basman
and Stephen Kell.
The characters in this essay are not entirely fictitious and I would like to thank (and
apologize) to colleagues who inspired them. Last but not least, I’m grateful to anonymous reviewers for thought provoking feedback that inspired many improvements in
the essay. Any remaining errors are mine and I’m willing to live with them.
Acknowledgements
References
[1] Sam Aaron and Jonathan Graham. Meta-eX: Live coding duo. Available online
at http://meta-ex.com. 2015.
[2] Ronald E Anderson, Deborah G Johnson, Donald Gotterbarn, and Judith Perrolle. “Using the new ACM code of ethics in decision making”. In: Communications of the ACM 36.2 (1993), pages 98–107.
[3] Joe Armstrong. “Making reliable distributed systems in the presence of sodware
errors”. PhD thesis. The Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm, 2003.
[4] Joseph Auslander. “On the roles of proof in mathematics”. In: Proofs and other
dilemmas: Mathematics and philosophy (2008), pages 61–77.
[5] Charles Babbage. “On the mathematical powers of the calculating engine”. In:
The origins of digital computers. Springer, 1982, pages 19–54.
[6] Tom Balmforth. Google Translate Makes Russia ’Mordor,’ Lavrov ’Sad Little Horse’.
Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, http://www.rferl.org/a/27468516.html. 2016.
[7] Kent Beck. Test-driven development: by example. Addison-Wesley Professional,
2003.
14-20
Tomas Petricek
[8] Alan Blackwell and Nick Collins. “The programming language as a musical
instrument”. In: Proceedings of PPIG05 (Psychology of Programming Interest
Group) 3 (2005), pages 284–289.
[9] Edwin Brady. “Idris, a general-purpose dependently typed programming language: Design and implementation”. In: Journal of Functional Programming
23.05 (2013), pages 552–593.
[10] Alan F Chalmers. What is this thing called science? Hackett Publishing, 2013.
[11] Jeremie Chassaing. If you are not live coding, you’re dead coding. Talk at the
NCrafts Conference, Online at: https://vimeo.com/131658147. 2015.
[12] Adam Chlipala. Certified Programming with Dependent Types: A Pragmatic
Introduction to the Coq Proof Assistant. MIT Press, 2013.
[13] Koen Claessen and John Hughes. “QuickCheck: a lightweight tool for random
testing of Haskell programs”. In: Acm sigplan notices 46.4 (2011), pages 53–64.
[14] Nick Davies. Flat Earth News. Chatto & Windus, 2008.
[15] Joe Dewhurst. “Mechanistic miscomputation: a reply to fresco and primiero”.
In: Philosophy & Technology 27.3 (2014), pages 495–498.
[16] Edsger Wybe Dijkstra. Notes on structured programming. EWD249, Section 3
(On The Reliability of Mechanisms). 1970.
[17] Nathan L Ensmenger. The computer boys take over: Computers, programmers,
and the politics of technical expertise. Mit Press, 2012.
[18] Luciano Floridi, Nir Fresco, and Giuseppe Primiero. “On malfunctioning software”. In: Synthese 192.4 (2015), pages 1199–1220.
[19] Nir Fresco and Giuseppe Primiero. “Miscomputation”. In: Philosophy and Technology. 2013, pages 253–272.
[20] Richard P Gabriel et al. “Defamiliarization: Flarf, conceptual writing, and
using flawed software tools as creative partners”. In: Knowledge Management
& E-Learning: An International Journal (KM&EL) 4.2 (2012), pages 134–145.
[21] Richard P Gabriel and Kevin J Sullivan. “Better science through art”. In: ACM
Sigplan Notices. Volume 45. 10. ACM. 2010, pages 885–900.
[22] Bonnie Gold and Roger A Simons. Proof and other dilemmas: mathematics and
philosophy. MAA, 2008.
[23] Ian Hacking. Representing and intervening: Introductory topics in the philosophy
of natural science. Volume 5. 1. Cambridge Univ Press, 1983.
[24] Charles Anthony Richard Hoare. “How did software get so reliable without
proof?” In: International Symposium of Formal Methods Europe. Springer. 1996,
pages 1–17.
[25] Anders Hoff. Høstutstillingen 2017 submission. Facebook album, Online at: h
ttps://www.facebook.com/inconvergent/media_set?set=a.985576514908994.
1073741833.100003699654323. 2016.
14-21
Learning to live with errors
[26] Ramtin Jabbari, Nauman bin Ali, Kai Petersen, and Binish Tanveer. “What
is DevOps? A Systematic Mapping Study on Definitions and Practices”. In:
Proceedings of the Scientific Workshop Proceedings of XP2016. ACM. 2016, page 12.
[27] Daniel Kahneman. Thinking, fast and slow. Macmillan, 2011.
[28] Casey Klein, John Clements, Christos Dimoulas, Carl Eastlund, Matthias Felleisen,
Matthew Flatt, Jay A McCarthy, Jon Rafkind, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt, and Robert
Bruce Findler. “Run your research: on the effectiveness of lightweight mechanization”. In: ACM SIGPLAN Notices 47.1 (2012), pages 285–296.
[29] Thomas S Kuhn. The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago
press, 2012.
[30] Imre Lakatos. “Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes”. In: Can Theories be Refuted? Springer, 1976, pages 205–259.
[31] Imre Lakatos. Proofs and refutations: The logic of mathematical discovery. Cambridge university press, 2015.
[32] Xavier Leroy. “The CompCert C verified compiler”. In: Documentation and user’s
manual. INRIA Paris-Rocquencourt (2012).
[33] Pete McBreen. Software craftsmanship: The new imperative. Addison-Wesley
Professional, 2002.
[34] Conor McBride and James McKinna. “The View from the Left”. In: J. Funct.
Program. 14.1 (Jan. 2004), pages 69–111. issn: 0956-7968. doi: 10 . 1017 / S
0956796803004829.
[35]
John McCarthy. “Towards a mathematical science of computation”. In: Program
Verification. Springer, 1993, pages 35–56.
[36] Erik Meijer. “The curse of the excluded middle”. In: Communications of the ACM
57.6 (2014), pages 50–55.
[37] Ravi Nair. “Big Data Needs Approximate Computing: Technical Perspective”.
In: Commun. ACM 58.1 (Dec. 2014), pages 104–104. issn: 0001-0782. doi:
10.1145/2688072.
[38] Linda Northrop, Peter Feiler, Richard P Gabriel, John Goodenough, Rick Linger,
Tom Longstaff, Rick Kazman, Mark Klein, Douglas Schmidt, Kevin Sullivan,
et al. Ultra-Large-Scale Systems The Software Challenge of the Future. Software
Engineering Institute Carnegie Mellon, 2006.
[39] Krishna V. Palem. “Energy Aware Algorithm Design via Probabilistic Computing:
From Algorithms and Models to Moore’s Law and Novel (Semiconductor) Devices”. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Compilers, Architecture
and Synthesis for Embedded Systems. CASES ’03. 2003, pages 113–116. isbn:
1-58113-676-5. doi: 10.1145/951710.951712.
[40] Karl Popper. The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge, 2005.
[41] Mark Priestley. A science of operations: machines, logic and the invention of
programming. Springer Science & Business Media, 2011.
14-22
Tomas Petricek
[42] Giuseppe Primiero. “A Taxonomy of Errors for Information Systems”. In: Minds
Mach. 24.3 (Aug. 2014), pages 249–273. issn: 0924-6495. doi: 10.1007/s11023013-9307-5.
[43] Bill Pyritz. “Craftsmanship versus engineering: Computer programming—An
art or a science?” In: Bell Labs technical journal 8.3 (2003), pages 101–104.
[44] Martin Rinard. “Acceptability-oriented Computing”. In: SIGPLAN Not. 38.12
(Dec. 2003), pages 57–75. issn: 0362-1340. doi: 10.1145/966051.966060.
[45] Susan Leigh Star and James R Griesemer. “Institutional ecology,translations’
and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of
Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39”. In: Social studies of science 19.3 (1989).
[46] Securities United States of America and Exchange commission. Administrative
proceedings in the matter of Knight Capital Americas LLC. File No. 3-15570. 2013.
14-23
Learning to live with errors
About the author
Tomas Petricek Tomas is a Visiting Researcher at the Alan Turing institute, working on tools for open data-driven storytelling
(http://thegamma.net). His many other interests include programming language theory (his PhD thesis is on coeffects, a theory of
context-aware programming languages), open-source and functional programming (he is an active contributor to the F# ecosystem), but also understanding programming through the perspective of philosophy of science. Contact him at [email protected].
14-24
| 6cs.PL
|
INFERRING A THIRD SPATIAL DIMENSION FROM 2D HISTOLOGICAL IMAGES
Maxime W. Lafarge
Josien P.W. Pluim
Koen A.J. Eppenhof
Pim Moeskops
Mitko Veta
arXiv:1801.03431v1 [cs.CV] 10 Jan 2018
Medical Image Analysis Group, Department of Biomedical Engineering,
Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands
ABSTRACT
Histological images are obtained by transmitting light through
a tissue specimen that has been stained in order to produce
contrast. This process results in 2D images of the specimen that has a three-dimensional structure. In this paper,
we propose a method to infer how the stains are distributed
in the direction perpendicular to the surface of the slide for
a given 2D image in order to obtain a 3D representation of
the tissue. This inference is achieved by decomposition of
the staining concentration maps under constraints that ensure
realistic decomposition and reconstruction of the original 2D
images. Our study shows that it is possible to generate realistic 3D images making this method a potential tool for data
augmentation when training deep learning models.
Index Terms— Histopathology Image Analysis, 3D Inference, Image Synthesis, Adversarial Training
1. INTRODUCTION
In clinical context, pathological diagnosis and prognosis commonly results from the analysis of bright-field microscopy images of histological slides. These 2D images are obtained by
transmitting light through the histological specimens, stained
beforehand, in order to attenuate light and produce contrast.
To quantify biomarkers of interest in 2D images, pathologists
rely on their experience and knowledge of the 3D context of
the objects they observe, when 3D microscopy techniques are
not considered.
Taking inspiration from the image formation process of
bright-field microscopy, we propose a method to infer a realistic decomposition of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained
histological slides along the axis of their thickness (z-axis),
resulting in 3D images. The decomposition of a given histological image is achieved by generating a volume of its underlying stain concentrations, such that new images obtained by
simulating transmitted light along other directions are realistic according to a trained discriminative deep learning model.
This study is motivated by the recent developments in
deep generative models [1], in particular for generating biological microscopy images [2]. In [3] the authors showed that
it is possible to train a generative adversarial network to infer
3D volumes from 2D training images only, without having to
rely on 3D training data. Likewise, our method trains a discriminator from 2D training images only, but can generate 3D
volumes that correspond to the decomposition of 2D images,
and therefore does not require a generator drawing samples
from a latent space.
The proposed algorithm can be seen as generating realistic
3D scenarios for the 2D observed scenes. As an example of
a possible application, the generated 3D volumes can be used
for data augmentation as they allow to create new “views” of
the same data. Generalization of deep learning models is a
known problem in automated histopathology image analysis,
and new augmentation methods can help improving generalization [4]. The 3D information inferred by our method can
also be used for analysis by synthesis strategies [5], to improve histopathology image analysis models, as it is a way to
include the prior that processed objects have a 3D structure.
2. METHOD
Histological images can be modeled as a set of stain concentrations at every pixel location [6] as illustrated in Fig. 1.
Thus, our method aims at solving the inverse problem of estimating the volume of stain concentrations that produced the
original histological image, for a chosen model of light absorption. We hypothesize that decomposition in depth is possible since the thickness of the histological specimens is of
the order of the image resolution. Such a volume is generated
under two constraints: (C1) the reconstruction of the original
image must be possible from the estimated volume, and (C2)
new images produced from the volume must be realistic.
2.1. Model of Stain Concentration Volume
The RGB pixel intensities can be modeled according to the
Beer-Lambert law of light absorption [6], such that the image intensity at each pixel location (x, y) can be decomposed
as Ic (x, y) = I0 exp (−Ac,∗ C(x, y)) with c = 1, 2, 3 the
color-channel index, A ∈ [0, +∞]3×2 the matrix of absorption coefficients specific to the current image, and C(x, y) ∈
[0, +∞]2 the H&E stain concentrations. We used the method
of [7] to achieve unsupervised staining unmixing of the images.
Based on the same model, the stain concentrations can be
discretized along the z-axis in N parts, such that C(x, y) =
PN −1
z=0 C(x, y, z).
(C1)
I0
I0
(C2)
(C2)
c
I(x,y)
I0
y0+N-1
y0
z
x0
x0+N-1
0
N
x
y
N-1
I0
Fig. 1. Decomposition of the estimated stain concentration
values of a digital slide along the z-axis at (x, y).
The constraint (C1) can be enforced by reducing the
problem to finding the vectors V(x, y, z) ∈ [0, 1]2 , with
PN −1
C(x, y, z) = C(x, y) V(x, y, z) and z=0 V(x, y, z) =
[1, 1]> describing how the concentrations C(x, y) are distributed along the z-axis (the operator is the element-wise
multiplication).
2.2. Simulation of Transmitted Light
For a given volume of concentrations, new images can be
generated by simulating transmitted light from different directions, using the same model of light absorption. In parproj
proj
are genand Iy=y
ticular, new projection images Ix=x
0 ,c
0 ,c
erated by simulating light transmission along the x-axis and
y-axis through the slices x ∈ [x0 , x0 + N − 1] and y ∈
[y0 , y0 + N − 1], as shown in Fig. 2. The pixel intensities
of these images are expressed in equation (1) as the sum of
stain concentrations in the direction of projection.
!
x0 +N
X−1
proj
Ix=x
(y, z) = I0 exp −Ac,∗
C(x, y, z)
0 ,c
x=x0
proj
Iy=y
(x, z) = I0 exp −Ac,∗
0 ,c
y0 +N
X−1
!
(1)
Fig. 2. Illustration of an inferred concentration volume block
of size N × N × N pixels. (C1) is respected by enforcing the
z-projection to reconstruct the original image patch. (C2) requires the x/y-projections, obtained by simulated transmitted
light (red arrows), to be realistic.
lying unrealistic concentration volume and “real” images that
are assumed to be the result of realistic volume of concentration distributions.
For a given image patch, 3D volume inference starts from
a 4D tensor V initialized with uniform concentration distributions. Then, the trained discriminative model (discriminator)
can be used to update V by gradient descent, so that the generated projections of the updated volume appear slightly more
realistic. The gradient of the loss of the discriminator with respect of the input is computed via back-propagation.
This update process (Fig. 3) is iterated until convergence:
when the discriminator classifies the generated projections as
realistic with small error.
This image generation approach via optimization of the
loss function of a neural network is similar to the methods
developed in [8, 9], and plays a role comparable to the generator of standard generative adversarial networks [1] in the
way how generated images are used as input to a discriminator.
C(x, y, z)
y=y0
N is carefully chosen such that the pixel resolution in the
xz-slices and yz-slices is the same as in the original xy-plane.
2.3. Realism Constraint
A convolutional neural network can be trained to discriminate
“fake” generated projection images that result from an under-
2.4. Discriminator Training
The discriminator is trained using two sets: a set of random
real image patches Sreal , and a set of adversarial examples
Sadv that are generated during training, using the projections
computed with (1), from previous states of the trained model.
The training procedure alternates between two steps.
First, the current state of the model is used to infer volumes
Original Image
Stain Concentration Maps
Concentration
Volume
Realism Score
Discriminator
Stain Concentration
Distributions
Simulated Projections
Iterative Gradient Descent Update
Fig. 3. Iterative process of generating a volume of concentrations constrained by an original image. The stain concentration
volume is updated by gradient descent in order to produce projection images that “fool” the fixed trained discriminator.
from real images via gradient update using the process presented in Sect. 2.2, and x/y-axis projections produced from
this volume are added to Sadv . Secondly, a batch of image
patches balanced between samples of Sreal and Sadv is used
to train the discriminator. Images in Sadv are sampled according to their misclassification probability such that the
model learns from the “fake” generated images that are the
most realistic and that are more challenging to classify.
3. EXPERIMENTS AND RESULTS
3.1. Dataset
We used the high power field images of H&E stained slides
of the public AMIDA13 dataset [10] for the experiments. 232
images of size 2000 × 2000 pixels from 8 different breast
cancer cases were used for training and the remaining images
were used to generate test examples.
3.2. Discriminator Architecture and Training Procedure
We implemented the discriminator that can classify input
patches as “fake” or realistic as a 6-layer convolutional neural
network. The network takes 24 × 24 image patches transformed to H&E concentration maps as input. Kernels of
size 3 × 3, batch normalization, average-pooling and leaky
ReLU non-linearities were used throughout. The network
was trained by minimizing the cross-entropy loss using the
Adam optimizer.
3.3. Generative Process and Extension to Large Images
We set the z-axis discretization to 24 pixels as we considered
6 micrometers as the maximum thickness of a tissue slice, in
which case the z-axis pixel resolution of the inferred volumes
can be the same as in the xy-plane (0.25 micrometers).
The discriminator, as such, can only infer volumes from
images of size 24 × 24. To overcome this limitation, volumes
of larger images can be inferred by optimizing overlapping
24 × 24 × 24 sub-volumes in parallel. This solution was used
to produce stain concentration volumes from 64 × 64 images.
The generated projections presented in Fig. 4 indicate that
the optimization process is able to distribute the stain concentrations of unseen images across the z-axis, and is able to
create new tissue structures that are realistic for the trained
discriminator.
4. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
We proposed a method for inferring the 3D structure of 2D
histological images. The method showed good qualitative
performance when applied to an image dataset of mitoses and
non-mitosis objects extracted from breast cancer histology
slides. Although the volumes generated by our method cannot be considered as representing the actual tissue structure,
the generated projections can still be considered as a likely
scenario and thus used as a data augmentation tool.
In addition to being driven by the image formation process
of bright-field microscopy, our method has the property that
the generated images are directly produced from the available data, the same way transformation-based augmentation
methods work. In contrast, generators drawing inputs from a
latent space, such as generative adversarial networks, do not
have this property.
Directions of future work include, further research to assess the realism quality of the generated images, and application of the generated 3D representation for data augmentation.
Original
x
y
0°
Generated
45°
90°
135°
Original
x
y
0°
Generated
45°
90°
135°
Fig. 4. Examples of projection images from generated volumes of stain concentration. The first row of each block shows the real
image patches the volumes were inferred from. The other rows show the projections obtained by simulating light transmission
in different oriented slices as indicated in the left column. The top block shows results on mitotic figures that were annotated
by expert pathologists, and the bottom block includes non-mitotic figures only.
5. REFERENCES
[1] I Goodfellow, J Pouget-Abadie, M Mirza, B Xu,
D Warde-Farley, S Ozair, A Courville, and Y Bengio,
“Generative adversarial nets,” in NIPS, 2014, pp. 2672–
2680.
[2] A Osokin, A Chessel, RE Carazo Salas, and F Vaggi,
“GANs for biological image synthesis,” in ICCV, 2017.
[3] M Gadelha, S Maji, and R Wang, “3D shape induction
from 2D views of multiple objects,” arXiv:1612.05872,
2016.
[4] MW Lafarge, JPW Pluim, KAJ Eppenhof, P Moeskops,
and M Veta, “Domain-adversarial neural networks to
address the appearance variability of histopathology images,” in MICCAI-DLMIA, 2017, pp. 83–91.
[5] M Hejrati and D Ramanan, “Analysis by synthesis: 3D
object recognition by object reconstruction,” in IEEE
CVPR, 2014, pp. 2449–2456.
[6] AC Ruifrok, DA Johnston, et al., “Quantification of
histochemical staining by color deconvolution,” Anal.
Quant. Cytol., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 291–299, 2001.
[7] M Macenko, M Niethammer, JS Marron, D Borland,
JT Woosley, X Guan, C Schmitt, and NE Thomas, “A
method for normalizing histology slides for quantitative
analysis,” in IEEE ISBI, 2009, pp. 1107–1110.
[8] L Gatys, AS Ecker, and M Bethge, “Texture synthesis
using convolutional neural networks,” in NIPS, 2015,
pp. 262–270.
[9] L Gatys, AS Ecker, and M Bethge, “Image style transfer
using convolutional neural networks,” in IEEE CVPR,
2016, pp. 2414–2423.
[10] M Veta, PJ van Diest, SM Willems, H Wang, A Madabhushi, A Cruz-Roa, F Gonzalez, ABL Larsen, JS Vestergaard, AB Dahl, et al., “Assessment of algorithms for
mitosis detection in breast cancer histopathology images,” Med. Image Anal., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 237–248,
2015.
| 1cs.CV
|
arXiv:1701.02108v2 [math.GR] 23 Jan 2017
RIGHT AMENABILITY AND GROWTH OF FINITELY
RIGHT GENERATED LEFT GROUP SETS
SIMON WACKER
Abstract. We introduce right generating sets, Cayley graphs,
growth functions, types and rates, and isoperimetric constants for
left homogeneous spaces equipped with coordinate systems; characterise right amenable finitely right generated left homogeneous
spaces with finite stabilisers as those whose isoperimetric constant
is 0; and prove that finitely right generated left homogeneous spaces
with finite stabilisers of sub-exponential growth are right amenable,
in particular, quotient sets of groups of sub-exponential growth by
finite subgroups are right amenable.
The notion of amenability for groups was introduced by John von
Neumann in 1929. It generalises the notion of finiteness. A group
G is left or right amenable if there is a finitely additive probability
measure on P(G) that is invariant under left and right multiplication
respectively. Groups are left amenable if and only if they are right
amenable. A group is amenable if it is left or right amenable.
The definitions of left and right amenability generalise to left and
right group sets respectively. A left group set (M, G, ⊲) is left amenable if there is a finitely additive probability measure on P(M) that is
invariant under ⊲. There is in general no natural action on the right
that is to a left group action what right multiplication is to left group
multiplication. Therefore, for a left group set there is no natural notion
of right amenability.
A transitive left group action ⊲ of G on M induces, for each element
m0 ∈ M and each family {gm0 ,m }m∈M of elements in G such that,
for each point m ∈ M, we have gm0 ,m ⊲ m0 = m, a right quotient
set semi-action P of G/G0 on M with defect G0 given by m P gG0 =
−1
gm0 ,m ggm
⊲m, where G0 is the stabiliser of m0 under ⊲. Each of these
0 ,m
Key words and phrases. group actions, generating sets, Cayley graphs, growth
rates, isoperimetric constants, amenability.
1
2
SIMON WACKER
right semi-actions is to the left group action what right multiplication
is to left group multiplication. They occur in the definition of global
transition functions of cellular automata over left homogeneous spaces
as defined in [6]. A cell space is a left group set together with choices
of m0 and {gm0 ,m }m∈M .
A cell space is right amenable if there is a finitely additive probability measure on P(M) that is semi-invariant under P. For example cell
spaces with finite sets of cells, abelian groups, and finitely right generated cell spaces with finite stabilisers of sub-exponential growth are
right amenable, in particular, quotients of finitely generated groups of
sub-exponential growth by finite subgroups acted on by left multiplication. A net of non-empty and finite subsets of M is a right Følner net
if, broadly speaking, these subsets are asymptotically invariant under
P. A finite subset E of G/G0 and two partitions {Ae }e∈E and {Be }e∈E
of M constitute a right paradoxical decomposition if the map _ P e is
injective on Ae and Be , and the family {(Ae P e) ∪· (Be P e)}e∈E is a
partition of M. The Tarski-Følner theorem states that right amenability, the existence of right Følner nets, and the non-existence of right
paradoxical decompositions are equivalent. We prove it in [7] for cell
spaces with finite stabilisers.
A cell space R is finitely right generated if there is a finite subset S of
G/G0 such that, for each point m ∈ M, there is a family {si }i∈{1,2,...,k}
of elements in S ∪ S −1 such that m = (((m0 P s1 ) P s2 ) P · · · ) P sk . The
finite right generating set S induces the S-Cayley graph structure on
M: For each point m ∈ M and each generator s ∈ S, there is an edge
from m to m P s. The length of the shortest path between two points
of M yields the S-metric. The ball of radius ρ ∈ N0 centred at m ∈ M,
denoted by BS (m, ρ), is the set of all points whose distance to m is less
than or equal to ρ. The S-growth function is the map γS : N0 → N0 ,
k 7→ |BS (m, k)|; the growth type of R, which does not depend on S, is
the equivalence class [γS ]∼ , where two growth functions are equivalent
if they dominate each other; and the S-growth rate is the limit point
p
of the sequence ( k γS (k))k∈K .
RIGHT AMENABILITY AND GROWTH
3
A finitely right generated cell space R is said to have sub-exponential
growth if its growth type is not [exp]∼ , which is the case if and only if
its growth rates are 1. The S-isoperimetric constant is a real number
between 0 and 1 that measures, broadly speaking, the invariance under
P↾M ×S that a finite subset of M can have, where 0 means maximally
and 1 minimally invariant. In the case that G0 is finite, this constant
is 0 if and only if R is right amenable, and if R has sub-exponential
growth, then it is right amenable, and if G has sub-exponential growth,
then so has R.
Cayley graphs were introduced by Arthur Cayley in his paper ‘Desiderata and suggestions: No. 2. The Theory of groups: graphical
representation’[1]. The notion of growth was introduced by Vadim Arsenyevich Efremovich and Albert S. Švarc in their papers ‘The geometry
of proximity’[3] and ‘A volume invariant of coverings’[5]. Mikhail Leonidovich Gromov was the first to study groups through their word metrics, see for example his paper ‘Infinite Groups as Geometric Objects’[4].
The present paper is greatly inspired by the monograph ‘Cellular Automata and Groups’[2] by Tullio Ceccherini-Silberstein and Michel Coornaert.
In Section 1 we introduce right generating sets. In Section 2 we
recapitulate directed multigraphs. In Section 3 we introduce Cayley
graphs induced by right generating sets. In Section 4 we introduce
metrics and lengths induced by Cayley graphs. In Section 5 we consider balls and spheres induced by metrics. In Section 6 we consider
interiors, closures, and boundaries of any thickness of sets. In Section 7 we recapitulate growth functions and types. In Section 8 we
introduce growth functions and types of cell spaces. In Section 9 we
introduce growth rates of cell spaces. In Section 10 we prove that right
amenability and having isoperimetric constant 0 are equivalent, and we
characterise right Følner nets. And in Section 11 we prove that having
sub-exponential growth implies right amenability.
Preliminary Notions. A left group set is a triple (M, G, ⊲), where M is
a set, G is a group, and ⊲ is a map from G × M to M, called left group
action of G on M, such that G → Sym(M), g 7→ [g ⊲ _], is a group
4
SIMON WACKER
homomorphism. The action ⊲ is transitive if M is non-empty and for
each m ∈ M the map _ ⊲ m is surjective; and free if for each m ∈ M
the map _ ⊲ m is injective. For each m ∈ M, the set G ⊲ m is the orbit
of m, the set Gm = (_ ⊲ m)−1 (m) is the stabiliser of m, and, for each
m′ ∈ M, the set Gm,m′ = (_ ⊲ m)−1 (m′ ) is the transporter of m to m′ .
A left homogeneous space is a left group set M = (M, G, ⊲) such
that ⊲ is transitive. A coordinate system for M is a tuple K = (m0 ,
{gm0 ,m }m∈M ), where m0 ∈ M and for each m ∈ M we have gm0 ,m ⊲m0 =
m. The stabiliser Gm0 is denoted by G0 . The tuple R = (M, K) is a cell
−1
space. The map P : M × G/G0 → M, (m, gG0 ) 7→ gm0 ,m ggm
⊲ m (=
0 ,m
gm0 ,m g ⊲m0) is a right semi-action of G/G0 on M with defect G0 , which
means that
∀ m ∈ M : m P G0 = m,
∀ m ∈ M ∀ g ∈ G ∃ g0 ∈ G0 : ∀ g′ ∈ G/G0 : m P g · g′ = (m P gG0) P g0 · g′ .
It is transitive, which means that the set M is non-empty and for each
m ∈ M the map m P _ is surjective; and free, which means that for
each m ∈ M the map m P _ is injective; and semi-commutes with ⊲,
which means that
∀ m ∈ M ∀ g ∈ G ∃ g0 ∈ G0 : ∀ g′ ∈ G/G0 : (g ⊲ m) P g′ = g ⊲ (m P g0 · g′ ).
The maps ι : M → G/G0 , m 7→ Gm0 ,m , and m0 P _ are inverse to each
other. Under the identification of M with G/G0 by either of these
maps, we have P : (m, g) 7→ gm0 ,m ⊲ g.
A left homogeneous space M is right amenable if there is a coordinate
system K for M and there is a finitely additive probability measure µ
on M such that
∀ g ∈ G/G0 ∀ A ⊆ M : (_ P g)↾A injective =⇒ µ(A P g) = µ(A) ,
in which case the cell space R = (M, K) is called right amenable.
When the stabiliser G0 is finite, that is the case if and only if there
is a right Følner net in R indexed by (I, ≤), which is a net {Fi }i∈I in
{F ⊆ M | F 6= ∅, F finite} such that
∀ g ∈ G/G0 : lim
i∈I
|Fi r (_ P g)−1 (Fi )|
= 0.
|Fi |
RIGHT AMENABILITY AND GROWTH
5
1. Right Generating Sets
In this section, let R = ((M, G, ⊲), (m0, {gm0 ,m }m∈M )) be a cell space.
In Definition 1.1 we define right generating sets of R. And in
Lemma 1.4 we show how generating sets of G induce right ones of
R.
Definition 1.1. Let S be a subset of G/G0 such that G0 · S ⊆ S.
(1) The set {g −1G0 | s ∈ S, g ∈ s} is denoted by S −1 .
(2) The set S is said to right generate R, called right generating
set of R, and each element s ∈ S is called right generator if
and only if, for each element m ∈ M, there is a non-negative
integer k ∈ N0 and there is a family {si }i∈{1,2,...,k} of elements
in S ∪ S −1 such that
(m0 P s1 ) P s2 P · · · P sk = m.
(3) The set S is called symmetric if and only if S −1 ⊆ S.
Definition 1.2. The cell space R is called finitely right generated if
and only if there is a right generating set of R that is finite.
Remark 1.3. If S is a right generating set of R, then S ∪ S −1 is a
symmetric one; and, if S is also finite and G0 is finite, then S ∪ S −1 is
finite.
Lemma 1.4. Let T be a generating set of G. The set S = {g0 · tG0 |
g0 ∈ G0 , t ∈ T } is a right generating set of R. And, if T is symmetric,
then so is S. And, if T and G0 are finite, then so is S.
Proof. Let m ∈ M. Then, because P is transitive, there is a g ∈ G
such that m0 P gG0 = m. Moreover, there is a k ∈ N0 and there is a
{ti }i∈{1,2,...,k} ⊆ T ∪ T −1 such that t1 t2 · · · tk = g. Furthermore, there is
a {gi,0}i∈{2,3,...,k} ⊆ G0 such that
(m0 P t1 G0 ) P g2,0 t2 G0 P · · · P gk,0 tk G0 = m0 P t1 t2 · · · tk G0 = m.
In conclusion, because t1 G0 ∈ S ∪ S −1 and {gi,0 ti G0 }i∈{2,3,...,k} ⊆ S ∪
S −1 , the set S is a right generating set of R.
6
SIMON WACKER
Let T be symmetric. Furthermore, let s ∈ S and let g ∈ s. Then,
there is a g0 ∈ G0 , there is a t ∈ T , and there is a g0′ ∈ G0 such that
g0 · tG0 = s and g0 tg0′ = g. Hence, because (g0′ )−1 ∈ G0 and t−1 ∈ T ,
g −1 G0 = (g0′ )−1 t−1 g0−1 G0 = (g0′ )−1 · t−1 G0 ∈ S.
In conclusion, S −1 ⊆ S.
If T and G0 are finite, then so is S.
2. Directed Multigraphs
Definition 2.1. Let V and E be two sets, and let σ and τ be two
maps from E to V . The quadruple G = (V, E, σ, τ ) is called directed
multigraph; each element v ∈ V is called vertex ; each element e ∈ E is
called edge from σ(e) to τ (e); for each element e ∈ E, the vertex σ(e)
is called source of e and the vertex τ (e) is called target of e.
Definition 2.2. Let G = (V, E, σ, τ ) be a directed multigraph and let
e be an edge of G. The edge e is called loop if and only if τ (e) = σ(e).
Definition 2.3. Let G = (V, E, σ, τ ) be a directed multigraph and let
v be a vertex of G.
(1) The cardinal number
deg+ (v) = |{e ∈ E | σ(e) = v}|
is called out-degree of v.
(2) The cardinal number
deg− (v) = |{e ∈ E | τ (e) = v}|
is called in-degree of v.
(3) The cardinal number
deg(v) = deg+ (v) + deg− (v)
is called degree of v.
Definition 2.4. Let G be a directed multigraph, and let v and v ′ be
two vertices of G. The vertices v and v ′ are called adjacent if and only
if there is an edge from v to v ′ or one from v ′ to v.
RIGHT AMENABILITY AND GROWTH
7
Definition 2.5. Let G = (V, E, σ, τ ) be a directed multigraph and let
p = (ei )i∈{1,2,...,k} be a finite sequence of edges of G. The sequence p
is called path from σ(e1 ) to τ (ek ) if and only if, for each index i ∈
{1, 2, . . . , k − 1}, we have τ (ei ) = σ(ei+1 ).
Definition 2.6. Let G be a directed multigraph and let p = (ei )i∈{1,2,...,k}
be a path in G. The number |p| = k is called length of p.
Definition 2.7. Let G = (V, E, σ, τ ) be a directed multigraph. It is
called
(1) symmetric if and only if, for each edge e ∈ E, there is an edge
e′ ∈ E such that σ(e′ ) = τ (e) and τ (e′ ) = σ(e);
(2) strongly connected if and only if, for each vertex v ∈ V and each
vertex v ′ ∈ V , there is a path p from v to v ′ ;
(3) regular if and only if all vertices of G have the same degree and,
for each vertex v ∈ V , we have deg− (v) = deg+ (v).
Definition 2.8. Let G = (V, E, σ, τ ) be a directed multigraph, let W
be a subset of V , let F be the set {e ∈ E | σ(e), τ (e) ∈ W }, let
ς be the map σ↾F →W , and let υ be the map τ ↾F →W . The subgraph
G[W ] = (W, F, ς, υ) of G is called induced by W .
Definition 2.9. Let G = (V, E, σ, τ ) be a symmetric and strongly
connected directed multigraph. The map
d : V × V → N0 ,
(v, v ′ ) 7→ min{|p| | p path from v to v ′ },
is a metric on V and called distance on G.
Definition 2.10. Let (V, E, σ, τ ) be a directed multigraph, let Λ be a
set, and let λ be a map from E to Λ. The quintuple G = (V, E, σ, τ, λ)
is called Λ-edge-labelled directed multigraph.
3. Cayley Graphs
In this section, let R = ((M, G, ⊲), (m0 , {gm0 ,m }m∈M )) be a cell space
and let S be a right generating set of R.
8
SIMON WACKER
Definition 3.1. Let E be the set {(m, s, m P s) | m ∈ M, s ∈ S}, and
let σ : E → M, λ : E → S, and τ : E → M be the projections to the
first, second, and third component respectively. The S-edge-labelled
directed multigraph G = (M, E, σ, τ, λ) is called S-Cayley graph of R.
Remark 3.2. Let G be the S-Cayley graph of R.
(1) If S is symmetric, then G is symmetric and strongly connected.
(2) The following statements are equivalent:
(a) G0 ∈ S;
(b) At least one vertex of G has a loop;
(c) All vertices of G have a loop.
(3) Because P is free, there are no multiple edges in G.
Remark 3.3. Let G be the S-Cayley graph of R, and let m and m′
be two vertices of G. The vertices m and m′ are adjacent if and only if
there is an element s ∈ S such that m P s = m′ .
Remark 3.4. Let G be the S-Cayley graph of R and let m be a vertex
of G. The map
S → m P S,
s 7→ m P s,
is a bijection onto the out-neighbourhood of m. It is injective, because
P is free, and it is surjective, by definition. Therefore, if S is symmetric,
then the degree of m is 2|S| in cardinal arithmetic and the graph G is
regular.
4. Metrics and Lengths
In this section, let R = ((M, G, ⊲), (m0 , {gm0 ,m }m∈M )) be a cell space
and let S be a symmetric right generating set of R.
In Definitions 4.1 and 4.6 we define the S-metric dS and the S-length
|_|S on R induced by the S-Cayley graph. And in Lemmas 4.3 and 4.4
we show how the S-metric relates to the left group action ⊲ and the
right quotient set semi-action P.
Definition 4.1. The distance on the S-Cayley graph of R is called
S-metric on R and denoted by dS .
RIGHT AMENABILITY AND GROWTH
9
Remark 4.2. The S-metric on R is
d S : M × M → N0 ,
(m, m′ ) 7→ min{k ∈ N0 | ∃{si }i∈{1,2,...,k} ⊆ S :
(((m P s1 ) P s2 ) P · · · ) P sk = m′ }.
Lemma 4.3. Let m and m′ be two elements of M, and let s be an
element of S. Then, dS (m, m′ P s) ≤ dS (m, m′ ) + 1.
Proof. Let k = dS (m, m′ ). Then, there is a {si }i∈{1,2,...,k} ⊆ S such that
(((m P s1 ) P s2 ) P · · · ) P sk = m′ . Hence, ((((m P s1 ) P s2 ) P · · · ) P sk ) P s =
m′ P s. Therefore, dS (m, m′ P s) ≤ dS (m, m′ ) + 1.
Lemma 4.4. Let m and m′ be two elements of M, and let g be an
element of G. Then, dS (g ⊲ m, g ⊲ m′ ) = dS (m, m′ ).
Proof. Let k = dS (g ⊲ m, g ⊲ m′ ). Then, there is a {si }i∈{1,2,...,k} ⊆ S
such that ((((g ⊲ m) P s1 ) P s2 ) P · · · ) P sk = g ⊲ m′ . Moreover, because
⊲ and P semi-commute, for each i ∈ {1, 2, . . . , k}, there is a gi,0 ∈ G0 ,
such that
(g ⊲ m) P s1 P s2 P · · · P sk
=
g ⊲ (m P g1,0 · s1 ) P s2 P · · · P sk
= ···
=g⊲
(m P g1,0 · s1 ) P g2,0 · s2
P · · · P gk,0 · sk .
Hence, (((m P g1,0 · s1 ) P g2,0 · s2 ) P · · · ) P gk,0 · sk = m′ . Therefore,
dS (m, m′ ) ≤ k = dS (g ⊲ m, g ⊲ m′ ).
Taking g ⊲ m for m, g ⊲ m′ for m′ , and g −1 for g yields dS (g ⊲ m, g ⊲
m′ ) ≤ dS (g −1 ⊲ (g ⊲ m), g −1 ⊲ (g ⊲ m′ )) = dS (m, m′ ). In conclusion,
dS (g ⊲ m, g ⊲ m′ ) = dS (m, m′ ).
Lemma 4.5. Let m and m′ be two elements of M, let {si }i∈{1,2,...,dS (m,m′ )}
be a family of elements in S such that m′ = (((m P s1 ) P s2 ) P · · · ) P
sdS (m,m′ ) , let i be an element of {0, 1, 2, . . . , dS (m, m′ )}, and let mi =
(((m P s1 ) P s2 ) P · · · ) P si Then, dS (m, mi ) = i.
10
SIMON WACKER
Proof. By definition of mi , we have dS (m, mi ) ≤ i and dS (mi , m′ ) ≤
dS (m, m′ ) − i. Therefore, because dS (m, m′ ) ≤ dS (m, mi ) + dS (mi , m′ ),
we have dS (m, mi ) ≥ dS (m, m′ )−dS (mi , m′ ) ≥ dS (m, m′ )−(dS (m, m′ )−
i) = i. In conclusion, dS (m, mi ) = i.
Definition 4.6. The map
|_|S : M → N0 ,
is called S-length on R.
m 7→ dS (m0 , m),
Remark 4.7. For each element m ∈ M, we have |m|S = 0 if and only
if m = m0 .
5. Balls and Spheres
In this section, let R = ((M, G, ⊲), (m0 , {gm0 ,m }m∈M )) be a cell space
and let S be a symmetric right generating set of R.
In Definition 5.1 we define balls BS and spheres SS in the S-metric
on R. And in the lemmata and corollaries of this section we show how
balls, spheres, the left group action ⊲, the right quotient set semi-action
P, and the S-metric relate to each other.
Definition 5.1. Let m be an element of M and let ρ be a non-negative
integer.
(1) The set
BS (m, ρ) = {m′ ∈ M | dS (m, m′ ) ≤ ρ}
is called ball of radius ρ centred at m. The ball of radius ρ
centred at m0 is denoted by BS (ρ).
(2) The set
SS (m, ρ) = {m′ ∈ M | dS (m, m′ ) = ρ}
is called sphere of radius ρ centred at m. The sphere of radius
ρ centred at m0 is denoted by SS (ρ).
Remark 5.2. For each element m ∈ M, we have SS (m, 0) = BS (m, 0),
and, for each positive integer ρ ∈ N+ , we have SS (m, ρ) = BS (m, ρ) r
BS (m, ρ − 1).
RIGHT AMENABILITY AND GROWTH
11
Remark 5.3. For each non-negative integer ρ ∈ N0 ,
BS (ρ) = {m ∈ M | |m|S ≤ ρ}
and
SS (ρ) = {m ∈ M | |m|S = ρ}.
Definition 5.4. Let (Ak )k∈N0 be a sequence of sets.
(1) The set
lim inf Ak =
k→∞
[ \
Aj
k∈N0 j∈N0
j≥k
is called limit inferior of (Ak )k∈N0 .
(2) The set
\ [
Aj
lim sup Ak =
k→∞
k∈N0 j∈N0
j≥k
is called limit superior of (Ak )k∈N0 .
(3) Let A be a set. The sequence (Ak )k∈N0 is said to converge to A,
the set A is called limit set of (Ak )k∈N0 , and A is denoted by
limk→∞ Ak if and only if lim inf k→∞ Ak = lim supk→∞ Ak = A.
(4) The sequence (Ak )k∈N0 is called convergent if and only if lim inf k→∞ Ak =
lim supk→∞ Ak .
Lemma 5.5. Let (Ak )k∈N0 be a non-decreasing or non-increasing seT
S
quence of sets. It converges to k∈N0 Ak or k∈N0 Ak respectively.
Remark 5.6. For each element m ∈ M, we have BS (m, 0) = {m}, and
the sequence (BS (m, ρ))ρ∈N0 is non-decreasing with respect to inclusion
and converges to M, and hence, for each non-negative integer ρ,
[
BS (m, ρ′ ) = M.
ρ′ ∈N0
ρ′ ≥ρ
Remark 5.7. For each element m ∈ M and each non-negative integer
ρ ∈ N0 , in cardinal arithmetic,
because the map
|BS (m, ρ)| ≤ (1 + |S|)ρ ,
({G0 } ∪ S)ρ → BS (m, ρ),
12
SIMON WACKER
(s1 , s2 , . . . , sρ ) 7→ (((m P s1 ) P s2 ) P · · · ) P sρ ,
is surjective and |{G0 } ∪ S|ρ ≤ (1 + |S|)ρ .
Lemma 5.8. Let m be an element of M, let ρ be a non-negative integer,
and let s be an element of S. Then, BS (m, ρ) P s ⊆ BS (m, ρ + 1).
Proof. Let m′ ∈ BS (m, ρ) P s. Then, there is an m′′ ∈ BS (m, ρ) such
that m′′ P s = m′ . Hence, according to Lemma 4.3, we have dS (m, m′ ) =
dS (m, m′′ P s) ≤ dS (m, m′′ ) + 1 ≤ ρ + 1. Therefore, m′ ∈ BS (m, ρ + 1).
In conclusion, BS (m, ρ) P s ⊆ BS (m, ρ + 1).
Lemma 5.9. Let m be an element of M, let ρ be a non-negative integer,
and let g be an element of G. Then, g ⊲ BS (m, ρ) = BS (g ⊲ m, ρ).
Proof. First, let m′ ∈ g ⊲ BS (m, ρ). Then, g −1 ⊲ m′ ∈ BS (m, ρ) and thus
dS (m, g −1 ⊲ m′ ) ≤ ρ. Hence, according to Lemma 4.4,
dS (g ⊲ m, m′ ) = dS (g −1 ⊲ (g ⊲ m), g −1 ⊲ m′ )
= dS (m, g −1 ⊲ m′ )
≤ ρ.
Therefore, m′ ∈ BS (g ⊲m, ρ). In conclusion, g ⊲BS (m, ρ) ⊆ BS (g ⊲m, ρ).
Secondly, let m′ ∈ BS (g ⊲ m, ρ). Then, dS (g ⊲ m, m′ ) ≤ ρ. Thus,
according to Lemma 4.4,
dS (m, g −1 ⊲ m′ ) = dS (g ⊲ m, g ⊲ (g −1 ⊲ m′ ))
= dS (g ⊲ m, m′ )
≤ ρ.
Hence, g −1 ⊲m′ ∈ BS (m, ρ). Therefore, m′ ∈ g⊲BS (m, ρ). In conclusion,
BS (g ⊲ m, ρ) ⊆ g ⊲ BS (m, ρ).
Corollary 5.10. Let m be an element of M, let ρ be a non-negative integer, and let gm be an element of Gm . Then, gm ⊲BS (m, ρ) = BS (m, ρ).
In particular, Gm ⊲ BS (m, ρ) = BS (m, ρ).
Proof. Because gm ⊲ m = m, this is a direct consequence of Lemma 5.9.
RIGHT AMENABILITY AND GROWTH
13
Corollary 5.11. Let m and m′ be two elements of M, and let ρ be a
non-negative integer. Then, |BS (m, ρ)| = |BS (m′ , ρ)|.
Proof. Because there is a g ∈ G such that g ⊲ m = m′ , and g ⊲ _ is
injective, this is a direct consequence of Lemma 5.9.
Lemma 5.12. Let m and m′ be two elements of M and identify M
with G/G0 by [m 7→ Gm0 ,m ]. Then, m P m′ = gm0 ,m ⊲ m′ .
Proof. Let g ∈ Gm0 ,m′ . Then, Gm0 ,m′ = gG0 . Hence,
m P m′ = m P Gm0 ,m′
= m P gG0
= gm0 ,m g ⊲ m0
= gm0 ,m ⊲ (g ⊲ m0 )
= gm0 ,m ⊲ m′ .
Lemma 5.13. Let m, m′ , and m′′ be three elements of M and identify
M with G/G0 by [m 7→ Gm0 ,m ]. Then, there is an element g0 ∈ G0
such that (m P m′ ) P m′′ = m P (m′ P (g0 ⊲ m′′ )).
Proof. Because P is a right semi-action, there is an element g0 ∈ G0
such that m P gm0 ,m′ · g0 · Gm0 ,m′′ = (m P gm0 ,m′ G0 ) P Gm0 ,m′′ . And, under
the identification of M with G/G0 , we have Gm0 ,m′′ = m′′ , gm0 ,m′ G0 =
Gm0 ,m′ = m′ , and gm0 ,m′ · g0 · Gm0 ,m′′ = m′ P (g0 ⊲ m′′ ). Therefore,
m P (m′ P (g0 ⊲ m′′ )) = (m P m′ ) P m′′ .
Corollary 5.14. Let m be an element of M, let ρ be a non-negative
integer, and identify M with G/G0 by [m 7→ Gm0 ,m ]. Then, mPBS (ρ) =
BS (m, ρ).
Proof. According to Lemma 5.12 and Lemma 5.9,
m P BS (ρ) = gm0 ,m ⊲ BS (ρ)
= gm0 ,m ⊲ BS (m0 , ρ)
= BS (gm0 ,m ⊲ m0 , ρ)
= BS (m, ρ).
14
SIMON WACKER
Corollary 5.15. Let m be an element of M, let ρ and ρ′ be two nonnegative integers, and identify M with G/G0 by [m 7→ Gm0 ,m ]. Then,
BS (m, ρ) P BS (ρ′ ) = BS (m, ρ + ρ′ ).
Proof. First, let m′ ∈ BS (m, ρ) P BS (ρ′ ). Then, there is an m′′ ∈
BS (m, ρ) such that m′ ∈ m′′ P BS (ρ′ ). Moreover, according to Corollary 5.14, we have m′′ P BS (ρ′ ) = BS (m′′ , ρ′ ). Hence, because dS is
subadditive, dS (m, m′ ) ≤ dS (m, m′′ ) + dS (m′′ , m′ ) ≤ ρ + ρ′ . Therefore,
m′ ∈ BS (m, ρ + ρ′ ). In conclusion, BS (m, ρ) P BS (ρ′ ) ⊆ BS (m, ρ + ρ′ ).
Secondly, let m′ ∈ BS (m, ρ + ρ′ ).
Case 1: m′ ∈ BS (m, ρ). Then, because m0 ∈ BS (ρ′ ), we have
m′ = m′ P m0 ∈ BS (m, ρ) P BS (ρ′ ).
Case 2: m′ ∈
/ BS (m, ρ). Then, there is a j ∈ {ρ + 1, ρ + 2, . . . , ρ +
′
ρ } and there is a {si }i∈{1,2,...,j} ⊆ S such that (((m′′ P sρ+1 ) P
sρ+2 ) P · · · ) P sρ+ρ′ = m′ , where m′′ = (((m P s1 ) P s2 ) P · · · ) P sρ ∈
BS (m, ρ). Hence, m′ ∈ BS (m′′ , ρ′ ) = m′′ P BS (ρ′ ) ⊆ BS (m, ρ) P
BS (ρ′ ).
In either case, m′ ∈ BS (m, ρ) P BS (ρ′ ). In conclusion, BS (m, ρ + ρ′ ) ⊆
BS (m, ρ) P BS (ρ′ ).
Definition 5.16. Let A and A′ be two subsets of M. The non-negative
number or infinity
dS (A, A′ ) = min{dS (a, a′ ) | a ∈ A, a′ ∈ A′ }
is called distance of A and A′ , where we put min ∅ = ∞. In the case
that A = {a}, we write dS (a, A′ ) in place of dS ({a}, A′ ); and in the
case that A′ = {a′ }, we write dS (A, a′ ) in place of dS (A, {a′ }).
Lemma 5.17. Let m and m′ be two elements of M, and let ρ be a nonnegative integer such that ρ ≤ dS (m, m′ ). Then, dS (SS (m, ρ), m′ ) =
dS (m, m′ ) − ρ.
Proof. Let ρ′ = dS (m, m′ ).
Then, there is a {si }i∈{1,2,...,ρ′ } such that (((m P s1 ) P s2 ) P · · · ) P sρ′ =
′
m . Let m′′ = (((m P s1 ) P s2 ) P · · · ) P sρ . Then, (((m′′ P sρ+1 ) P sρ+2 ) P
· · · ) P sρ′ = m′ . And, according to Lemma 4.5, we have m′′ ∈ SS (m, ρ).
Thus, dS (SS (m, ρ), m′ ) ≤ dS (m′′ , m′ ) ≤ ρ′ − ρ.
RIGHT AMENABILITY AND GROWTH
15
Suppose that dS (SS (m, ρ), m′ ) < ρ′ − ρ. Then, there is an m′′ ∈
SS (m, ρ) such that dS (m′′ , m′ ) < ρ′ −ρ. Hence, dS (m, m′ ) ≤ dS (m, m′′ )+
dS (m′′ , m′ ) < ρ+(ρ′ −ρ) = ρ′ , which contradicts dS (m, m′ ) = ρ′ . Therefore, dS (SS (m, ρ), m′ ) ≥ ρ′ − ρ.
In conclusion, dS (SS (m, ρ), m′ ) = ρ′ − ρ = dS (m, m′ ) − ρ.
Corollary 5.18. Let m be an element of M, and let ρ and ρ′ be two
non-negative integers such that the spheres SS (m, ρ) and SS (m, ρ′ ) are
non-empty. Then, dS (SS (m, ρ), SS (m, ρ′ )) = |ρ − ρ′ |.
Proof. Without loss of generality, let ρ ≤ ρ′ . Then, for each m′ ∈
SS (m, ρ′ ), according to Lemma 5.17, we have dS (SS (m, ρ), m′ ) = ρ′ − ρ.
In conclusion, dS (SS (m, ρ), SS (m, ρ′ )) = ρ′ − ρ = |ρ − ρ′ |.
Corollary 5.19. Let m and m′ be two elements of M, and let ρ be a
non-negative integer. Then, dS (SS (m, ρ), m′ ) ≥ |dS (m, m′ ) − ρ|.
Proof. If SS (m, ρ) = ∅, then dS (SS (m, ρ), m′ ) = ∞ ≥ |dS (m, m′ ) − ρ|.
Otherwise, let ρ′ = dS (m, m′ ). Then, SS (m, ρ′ ) 6= ∅. Hence, according
to Corollary 5.18, we have dS (SS (m, ρ), m′ ) ≥ dS (SS (m, ρ), SS (m, ρ′ )) =
|ρ − ρ′ | = |dS (m, m′ ) − ρ|.
Lemma 5.20. Let m and m′ be two elements of M, and let ρ and
ρ′ be two non-negative integers such that ρ + ρ′ ≤ dS (m, m′ ). Then,
dS (BS (m, ρ), BS (m′ , ρ′ )) = dS (m, m′ ) − (ρ + ρ′ ).
Proof. For each mρ ∈ BS (m, ρ) and each m′ρ′ ∈ BS (m′ , ρ′ ), because dS
is subadditive,
dS (m, m′ ) ≤ dS (m, mρ ) + dS (mρ , m′ρ′ ) + dS (m′ρ′ , m′ )
≤ ρ + dS (mρ , m′ρ′ ) + ρ′ ,
and hence dS (mρ , m′ρ′ ) ≥ dS (m, m′ )−(ρ+ρ′ ). Therefore, dS (BS (m, ρ), BS (m′ , ρ′ )) ≥
dS (m, m′ ) − (ρ + ρ′ ).
Moreover, there is a {si }i∈{1,2,...,dS (m,m′ )} such that (((mPs1 )Ps2 ) · · · )P
sdS (m,m′ ) = m′ . Let mρ = ((m P s1 ) P · · · ) P sρ and let m′ρ′ = ((mρ P
sρ+1 ) P · · · ) P sdS (m,m′ )−ρ′ . Then, mρ ∈ BS (m, ρ) and, because (((m′ρ′ P
sdS (m,m′ )−ρ′ +1 ) P sdS (m,m′ )−ρ′ +2 ) · · · ) P sdS (m,m′ ) = m′ , we have m′ρ′ ∈
16
SIMON WACKER
BS (m′ , ρ′ ). And, dS (mρ , m′ρ′ ) ≤ dS (m, m′ )−ρ′ −ρ. Therefore, dS (BS (m, ρ), BS (m′ , ρ′ )) ≤
dS (m, m′ ) − (ρ + ρ′ ).
In conclusion, dS (BS (m, ρ), BS (m′ , ρ′ )) = dS (m, m′ ) − ρ − ρ′ .
6. Interiors, Closures, and Boundaries
In this section, let R = ((M, G, ⊲), (m0 , {gm0 ,m }m∈M )) be a cell space
and let S be a symmetric right generating set of R.
In Definition 6.1 we define θ-interiors A−θ , θ-closures A+θ , and (internal/external) θ-boundaries ∂θ A, ∂θ− A, or ∂θ+ A. And in the lemmata
and corollaries of this section we characterise them and show how they
and the S-metric relate to each other.
Definition 6.1. Let A be a subset of M, let θ be a non-negative
integer, and identify M with G/G0 by [m 7→ Gm0 ,m ].
(1) The set
A−θ = A−BS (θ)
= {m ∈ M | m P BS (θ) ⊆ A}
is called θ-interior of A.
(2) The set
A+θ = A+BS (θ)
= {m ∈ M | (m P BS (θ)) ∩ A 6= ∅}
is called θ-closure of A.
(3) The set
∂θ A = A+θ r A−θ
= A+BS (θ) r A−BS (θ) = ∂BS (θ) A
is called θ-boundary of A.
(4) The set
∂θ− A = A r A−θ
is called internal θ-boundary of A.
(5) The set
∂θ+ A = A+θ r A
is called external θ-boundary of A.
Lemma 6.2. Let A be a subset of M and identify M with G/G0 by
[m 7→ Gm0 ,m ]. For each non-negative integer θ ∈ N0 ,
(1) A−θ = {m ∈ A | BS (m, θ) ⊆ A};
RIGHT AMENABILITY AND GROWTH
(2) A+θ =
[
17
BS (m, θ) = A P BS (θ).
m∈A
Proof. Let θ ∈ N0 and let m ∈ M.
(1) According to Corollary 5.14,
A−θ = {m ∈ M | BS (m, θ) ⊆ A}.
Therefore, because m ∈ BS (m, θ),
A−θ = {m ∈ A | BS (m, θ) ⊆ A}.
(2) According to Corollary 5.14,
A+θ = {m ∈ M | (m P BS (θ)) ∩ A 6= ∅}
= {m ∈ M | ∃ m′ ∈ A : m′ ∈ m P BS (θ)}
= {m ∈ M | ∃ m′ ∈ A : m′ ∈ BS (m, θ)}.
Moreover, because of the symmetry of dS , for each m′ ∈ A,
m′ ∈ BS (m, θ) ⇐⇒ dS (m, m′ ) ≤ θ
⇐⇒ m ∈ BS (m′ , θ).
Hence, according to Corollary 5.14,
A+θ = {m ∈ M | ∃ m′ ∈ A : m ∈ BS (m′ , θ)}
[
=
BS (m′ , θ)
m′ ∈A
=
[
m′ P BS (θ)
m′ ∈A
= A P BS (θ).
Corollary 6.3. Let m be an element of M, let ρ be a non-negative
integer, and let θ be a non-negative integer. Then,
(1) BS (m, ρ)−θ ⊇ BS (m, ρ − θ);
(2) BS (m, ρ)+θ = BS (m, ρ + θ);
(3) ∂θ BS (m, ρ) ⊆ BS (m, ρ + θ) r BS (m, ρ − θ).
Proof.
(1) According to Corollary 5.15, we have BS (m, ρ − θ) P
BS (θ) ⊆ BS (m, ρ). Hence, according to Definition 6.1, we have
BS (m, ρ − θ) ⊆ BS (m, ρ)−θ .
18
SIMON WACKER
(2) According to Item 2 of Lemma 6.2 and Corollary 5.15, we have
BS (m, ρ)+θ = BS (m, ρ) P BS (θ) = BS (m, ρ + θ).
(3) This is a direct consequence of Items 1 and 2.
Lemma 6.4. Let A be a subset of M, and let θ and θ′ be two nonnegative integers. The following statements hold:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
Proof.
′
′
(A−θ )−θ = A−(θ+θ ) ;
′
∂θ−′ A−θ = A−θ r A−(θ+θ ) ;
′
′
(A+θ )+θ = A+(θ+θ ) ;
′
∂θ+′ A+θ = A+(θ+θ ) r A+θ ;
′
′
′
′
Let θ′ ≤ θ. Then, A+(θ−θ ) ⊆ (A+θ )−θ and (A−θ )+θ ⊆ A−(θ−θ ) .
(1) For each m′ ∈ A, according to Corollary 5.14 and Lemma 6.2,
we have m′ ∈ A−θ if and only if m′ P BS (θ) = BS (m′ , θ) ⊆ A.
Hence, according to Corollary 5.15,
′
(A−θ )−θ = {m′ ∈ A | BS (m′ , θ′ ) ⊆ A−θ }
= {m′ ∈ A | BS (m′ , θ′ ) P BS (θ) ⊆ A}
= {m′ ∈ A | BS (m′ , θ + θ′ ) ⊆ A}
′
= A−(θ+θ ) .
(2) According to Item 1,
∂θ−′ A−θ = A−θ r (A−θ )−θ
′
′
= A−θ r A−(θ+θ ) .
(3) According to Lemma 6.2 and Corollary 5.15,
′
(A+θ )+θ = A+θ P BS (θ′ )
=
[
BS (m, θ)
m∈A
=
[
!
P BS (θ ′ )
BS (m, θ) P BS (θ′ )
m∈A
=
[
BS (m, θ + θ′ )
m∈A
′
= A+(θ+θ ) .
RIGHT AMENABILITY AND GROWTH
19
(4) According to Item 3,
′
∂θ+′ A+θ = (A+θ )+θ r A+θ
′
= A+(θ+θ ) r A+θ .
(5) According to Lemma 6.2 and Item 3,
′
′
A+(θ−θ ) P BS (θ′ ) = (A+(θ−θ ) )+θ
′
′
′
= A+((θ−θ )+θ )
= A+θ .
Thus, for each m ∈ A+(θ−θ ) , according to Corollary 5.15, we
have BS (m, θ′ ) = m P BS (θ′ ) ⊆ A+θ and, in particular, m ∈
′
A+θ . Therefore, according to Lemma 6.2, we have A+(θ−θ ) ⊆
′
(A+θ )−θ .
According to Lemma 6.2, Item 3, and Definition 6.1,
′
(A−θ )+θ
′
P BS (θ
′
′
− θ′ ) = ((A−θ )+θ )+(θ−θ )
′
′
= (A−θ )+θ +(θ−θ )
= (A−θ )+θ
= A−θ P BS (θ)
⊆ A.
Therefore, according to Definition 6.1, we have (A−θ )+θ ⊆
′
A−(θ−θ ) .
′
Lemma 6.5. Let k be a non-negative integer, and let A and A′ be two
subsets of M. Then, dS (A, A′ r A+k ) ≥ k + 1.
Proof. If A or A′ r A+k is empty, then dS (A, A′ r A+k ) = ∞ ≥ k + 1.
Otherwise, let m′ ∈ A′ r A+k . According to [8, Item 3 of Lemma 1], we
have A′ r A+k = (A′ r A)−k . Hence, according to Lemma 6.2, we have
BS (m′ , k) ⊆ A′ rA. Therefore, for each m ∈ A, we have m ∈
/ BS (m′ , k)
and hence dS (m, m′ ) ≥ k + 1. Thus, dS (A, m′ ) ≥ k + 1. In conclusion,
dS (A, A′ r A+k ) ≥ k + 1.
Corollary 6.6. Let k be a non-negative integer, let k ′ be a positive
integer, and let A be a subset of M. Then, dS (A, ∂k+′ A+k ) ≥ k + 1.
20
SIMON WACKER
Proof. Because ∂k+′ A+k = (A+k )+k r A+k , this is a direct consequence
of Lemma 6.5.
′
Lemma 6.7. Let A be a finite subset of M and let S ′ be the set {G0 } ∪
S. There is a non-negative integer k ∈ N0 such that
A ⊆ {m ∈ M | ∃{s′i }i∈{1,2,...,k} ⊆ S ′ : (((m0 P s′1 ) P s′2 ) P · · · ) P s′k }.
Proof. If A is empty, then any k ∈ N0 works. Otherwise, let k =
maxa∈A dS (m0 , a). Because A is finite, we have k ∈ N0 . By the choice
of k, we have A ⊆ B(m0 , k). And, because G0 ∈ S ′ and _ P G0 = idM ,
we have B(m0 , k) = {m ∈ M | ∃{s′i }i∈{1,2,...,k} ⊆ S ′ : (((m0 P s′1 ) P s′2 ) P
· · · ) P s′k }. In conclusion, the stated inclusion holds.
7. Growth Functions And Types
In this section we recapitulate growth functions and types, more or
less as presented in the monograph ‘Cellular Automata and Groups’[2].
Definition 7.1. Let γ be a map from N0 to R≥0 . It is called growth
function if and only if it is non-decreasing, that is to say, that
∀ k ∈ N0 ∀ k ′ ∈ N0 : k ≤ k ′ =⇒ γ(k) ≤ γ(k ′ ) .
Definition 7.2. Let γ and γ ′ be two growth functions. The growth
function γ is said to dominate γ ′ and we write γ < γ ′ if and only if
∃ α ∈ N+ : ∀ k ∈ N+ : α · γ(α · k) ≥ γ ′ (k).
Definition 7.3. Let γ and γ ′ be two growth functions. They are called
equivalent and we write γ ∼ γ ′ if and only if γ < γ ′ and γ ′ < γ.
Lemma 7.4 ([2, Proposition 6.4.3]).
(1) The relation < is reflexive and transitive.
(2) The relation ∼ is an equivalence relation.
(3) If γ1 ∼ γ2 and γ1′ ∼ γ2′ , then γ1 < γ1′ implies γ2 < γ2′ .
Definition 7.5. Let γ be a growth function. The equivalence class of
γ with respect to ∼ is denoted by [γ]∼ and called growth type.
RIGHT AMENABILITY AND GROWTH
21
Definition 7.6. Let Γ and Γ′ be two growth types. The growth type
Γ is said to dominate Γ′ and we write Γ < Γ′ if and only if
∃ γ ∈ Γ ∃ γ ′ ∈ Γ′ : γ < γ ′ .
Example 7.7 ([2, Examples 6.4.4]).
(1) The growth function [k 7→ k] dominates 1 but they are not
equivalent.
Proof. For each k ∈ N+ , we have k ≥ 1(k). But, for each
α ∈ N+ , there is a k ∈ N+ , for example k = α + 1, such that
α1(αk) = α < k.
(2) Let r and s be two non-negative real numbers. Then, [k 7→
k r ] < [k 7→ k s ] if and only if r ≥ s. And, [k 7→ k r ] ∼ [k 7→ k s ]
if and only if r = s.
(3) Let γ be a growth function such that it is a polynomial function
of degree d ∈ N0 . Then, γ ∼ [k 7→ k d ].
(4) Let r and s be two elements of R>1 . Then, [k 7→ r k ] ∼ [k 7→ sk ].
In particular, [k 7→ r k ] ∼ exp.
Proof. Without loss of generality, suppose that r ≤ s. Then,
for each k ∈ N+ , we have r k ≤ sk . Hence, [k 7→ r k ] 4 [k 7→ sk ].
Moreover, let α = ⌈logr s⌉ ∈ N+ . Then, for each k ∈ N+ ,
sk = (r logr s )k = r (logr s)k ≤ r αk ≤ αr αk .
Hence, [k 7→ r k ] < [k 7→ sk ]. In conclusion, [k 7→ r k ] ∼ [k 7→
sk ].
(5) Let d be a non-negative integer. Then, exp < [k 7→ k d ] and
[k 7→ k d ] ≁ exp.
Proof. See [2, Examples 6.4.4 (d)].
Lemma 7.8. Let γ be a growth function and let d be a non-negative
integer such that [k 7→ k d ] < γ. Then, exp < γ and exp ≁ γ.
Proof. According to Item 5 of Example 7.7, we have exp < [k 7→ k d ]
and exp ≁ [k 7→ k d ]. Hence, because < is transitive and [k 7→ k d ] < γ,
we have exp < γ and exp ≁ γ.
22
SIMON WACKER
8. Cell Spaces’ Growth Functions and Types
In this section, let R = ((M, G, ⊲), (m0 , {gm0 ,m }m∈M )) be a cell space
such that there is a finite and symmetric right generating set S of R.
In Definition 8.1 we define the S-growth function γS of R. In
Lemma 8.3 and its corollaries we show that γS is dominated by exp and
that the ∼-equivalence class [γS ]∼ does not depend on S. In Definition 8.10 we define the growth type γ(R) of R as that equivalence class.
In Lemma 8.13 and its corollary we relate the inclusion-behaviour of
the sequence of balls to the cardinality of M. And in Definition 8.17 we
define the terms ‘exponential growth’, ‘sub-exponential growth’, ‘polynomial growth’, and ‘intermediate growth of R’.
Definition 8.1. The map
γ S : N0 → N0 ,
k 7→ |BS (k)|,
is called S-growth function of R.
Remark 8.2. According to Remark 5.6, we have γS (0) = 1 and the
sequence (γS (k))k∈N0 is non-decreasing with respect to the partial order
≤. Moreover, according to Remark 5.7, for each non-negative integer
k ∈ N0 , we have γS (k) ≤ (1 + |S|)k .
Lemma 8.3. Let S ′ be a finite and symmetric right generating set of
R and let α be the non-negative integer min{k ∈ N0 | BS (1) ⊆ BS ′ (k)}.
Then,
∀ m ∈ M ∀ m′ ∈ M : dS ′ (m, m′ ) ≤ α · dS (m, m′ ),
in particular,
∀ m ∈ M : |m|S ′ ≤ α · |m|S .
Proof. For each m ∈ M, let αm = min{k ∈ N0 | BS (m, 1) ⊆ BS ′ (m, k)},
in particular, αm0 = α.
Proof of: ∀ m ∈ M : αm = α. Let m ∈ M, let k ∈ N0 , and let
g ∈ Gm0 ,m . Then, because g ⊲ _ is bijective, BS (1) ⊆ BS ′ (k) if and
only if g ⊲ BS (1) ⊆ g ⊲ BS ′ (k). Moreover, according to Lemma 5.9,
we have g ⊲ BS (1) = BS (m, 1) and g ⊲ BS ′ (k) = BS ′ (m, k). Therefore,
RIGHT AMENABILITY AND GROWTH
23
BS (1) ⊆ BS ′ (k) if and only if BS (m, 1) ⊆ BS ′ (m, k). In conclusion,
αm = α.
Proof by induction on the distance, that is, proof by induction on k
of
∀ k ∈ N0 ∀ m ∈ M ∀ m′ ∈ M :
(dS (m, m′ ) = k =⇒ dS ′ (m, m′ ) ≤ α · k).
Base Case. Let k = 0. Furthermore, let m and m′ ∈ M such that
dS (m, m′ ) = k. Then, m = m′ . Hence, dS ′ (m, m′ ) = 0. Therefore,
dS ′ (m, m′ ) ≤ α · k.
Inductive Step. Let k ∈ N0 such that
∀ m ∈ M ∀ m′ ∈ M : (dS (m, m′ ) = k =⇒ dS ′ (m, m′ ) ≤ α · k).
Furthermore, let m and m′′ ∈ M such that dS (m, m′′ ) = k + 1. Then,
there is a {si }i∈{1,2,...,k+1} ⊆ S such that m′ P sk+1 = m′′ , where
m′ = (((m P s1 ) P s2 ) P · · · ) P sk . And, according to Lemma 4.5,
we have dS (m, m′ ) = k. Therefore, according to the inductive hypothesis, dS ′ (m, m′ ) ≤ α · k. Moreover, by definition of αm′ , we have
m′′ = m′ P sk+1 ∈ BS (m′ , 1) ⊆ BS ′ (m′ , αm′ ). Hence, because αm′ = α,
we have dS ′ (m′ , m′′ ) ≤ αm′ = α. In conclusion, because dS ′ is subadditive, dS ′ (m, m′′ ) ≤ dS ′ (m, m′ ) + dS ′ (m′ , m′′ ) ≤ α · k + α = α · (k + 1).
Corollary 8.4. In the situation of Lemma 8.3, for each element m ∈
M and each non-negative integer k ∈ N0 , we have BS (m, k) ⊆ BS ′ (m, α·
k).
Proof. This is a direct consequence of Lemma 8.3, because for each
element m ∈ M, each non-negative integer k ∈ N0 , and each element
m′ ∈ M, if dS (m, m′ ) ≤ k, then dS ′ (m, m′ ) ≤ α · k.
Corollary 8.5. In the situation of Lemma 8.3, for each non-negative
integer k ∈ N0 , we have γS (k) ≤ γS ′ (α · k).
Proof. This is a direct consequence of Corollary 8.4.
Definition 8.6. Let X be a set, and let d and d′ be metrics on X.
The metrics d and d′ are called Lipschitz equivalent if and only if there
are positive real numbers κ and κ such that κ · d ≤ d′ ≤ κ · d.
24
SIMON WACKER
Corollary 8.7. Let S ′ be a finite and symmetric right generating set
of R. The metrics dS and dS ′ are Lipschitz equivalent.
Proof. Let α = min{k ∈ N0 | BS (1) ⊆ BS ′ (k)} and let α′ = min{k ∈
N0 | BS ′ (1) ⊆ BS (k)}. If α = 0 or α′ = 0, then M = {m0 }, hence
dS = 0 = dS ′ , and therefore dS ≤ dS ′ ≤ dS . Otherwise, according to
Lemma 8.3, we have α1 · dS ′ ≤ dS ≤ α′ · dS ′ .
Corollary 8.8. Let S ′ be a finite and symmetric right generating set
of R. The S-growth function γS of R and the S ′ -growth function γS ′
of R are equivalent.
Proof. According to Corollary 8.5, there is a α ∈ N0 such that, for each
k ∈ N0 , we have γS (k) ≤ γS ′ (α · k). Hence, according to Remark 8.2,
for each k ∈ N0 , we have γS (k) ≤ (α + 1)γS ′ ((α + 1) · k). Therefore,
γS is dominated by γS ′ . Switching roles of S and S ′ yields that γS ′ is
dominated by γS . In conclusion, γS and γS ′ are equivalent.
Corollary 8.9. The S-growth function γS of R is dominated by exp.
Proof. According to Remark 8.2, for each k ∈ N0 , we have γS (k) ≤ r k ,
where r = 1+|S|. Hence, γS 4 [k 7→ r k ]. Moreover, according to Item 4
of Example 7.7, we have [k 7→ r k ] ∼ exp. In conclusion, γS 4 exp.
Definition 8.10. The equivalence class γ(R) = [γS ]∼ is called growth
type of R.
Lemma 8.11 ([2, Proposition 6.4.6]). Let γ be a growth function such
that γ(0) > 0. Then, γ is equivalent to 1 if and only if γ is bounded.
Corollary 8.12. The set M is finite if and only if the growth types
γ(R) and [1]∼ are equal.
Proof. First, let M be finite. Then, for each k ∈ N0 , we have γS (k) ≤
|M| = |M| · 1(|M| · k).
Secondly, let γ(R) = [1]∼ . Then, according to Lemma 8.11, γS is
S
bounded by some ξ ∈ R>0 . Therefore, because M = k∈N0 BS (k),
(BS (k))k∈N0 is non-decreasing with respect to ⊆, and (γS (k))k∈N0 =
(|BS (k)|)k∈N0 , we have |M| ≤ supk∈N0 γS (k) ≤ ξ. In conclusion, M is
finite.
RIGHT AMENABILITY AND GROWTH
25
Lemma 8.13. Either the sequence (BS (k))k∈N0 is strictly increasing
with respect to ⊆ or eventually constant, that is to say, that there is
a non-negative integer k ∈ N0 such that, for each non-negative integer
k ′ ∈ N0 with k ′ ≥ k, we have BS (k ′ ) = BS (k).
Proof. According to Remark 5.6, the sequence (BS (k))k∈N0 is non-decreasing
with respect to ⊆. If it is strictly increasing with respect to ⊆, it
is not eventually constant. Otherwise, there is a k ∈ N0 such that
BS (k) = BS (k + 1). We proof by induction on k ′ that, for each k ′ ∈ N0
with k ′ ≥ k, we have BS (k ′ ) = BS (k).
Base Case. Let k ′ = k. Then, BS (k ′ ) = BS (k).
Inductive Step. Let k ′ ∈ N0 with k ′ ≥ k such that BS (k ′ ) = BS (k).
Furthermore, let m ∈ BS (k ′ + 1).
Case 1: m ∈ BS (k ′ ). Then, according to the inductive hypothesis, m ∈ BS (k).
Case 2: m ∈
/ BS (k ′ ). Then, there is a {si }i∈{1,2,...,k′+1} ⊆ S such
that m′ P sk′ +1 = m, where m′ = (((m0 P s1 ) P s2 ) P · · · ) P
sk′ . Hence, m′ ∈ BS (k ′ ) and thus, according to the inductive
hypothesis, m′ ∈ BS (k). Therefore, according to Lemma 5.8,
we have m ∈ BS (k + 1). Thus, because BS (k + 1) = BS (k), we
have m ∈ BS (k).
In either case, m ∈ BS (k). Therefore, BS (k ′ + 1) ⊆ BS (k) ⊆ BS (k ′ ) ⊆
BS (k ′ + 1). In conclusion, BS (k ′ + 1) = BS (k).
In conclusion, (BS (k))k∈N0 is eventually constant.
Corollary 8.14. The set M is infinite if and only if the sequence
(BS (k))k∈N0 is strictly increasing with respect to ⊆.
Proof. First, let M be infinite. Suppose that (BS (k))k∈N0 is eventually
constant. Then, there is a k ∈ N0 such that, for each k ′ ∈ N0 with
k ′ ≥ k, we have BS (k ′ ) = BS (k). Hence, according to Remark 5.6, we
S
have M = k′ ∈N0 ,k′≥k BS (k ′ ) = BS (k) and therefore, according to Remark 5.7, the set M is finite, which contradicts the precondition that
M is infinite. Thus, (BS (k))k∈N0 is not eventually constant. In conclusion, according to Lemma 8.13, the sequence (BS (k))k∈N0 is strictly
increasing with respect to ⊆.
26
SIMON WACKER
Secondly, let (BS (k))k∈N0 be strictly increasing with respect to ⊆.
S
Then, because M = k∈N0 BS (k), the set M is infinite.
Corollary 8.15. The set M is infinite if and only if
(1)
∀ ρ ∈ N0 : SS (ρ) 6= ∅.
Proof. We have SS (0) = {m0 } =
6 ∅. And, according to Remark 5.2, for
each ρ ∈ N+ , we have SS (ρ) = BS (ρ) r BS (ρ − 1). Hence, (BS (k))k∈N0
is strictly increasing with respect to ⊆ if and only if Eq. (1) holds.
Therefore, according to Corollary 8.14, the set M is infinite if and only
if Eq. (1) holds.
Lemma 8.16. The set M is infinite if and only if the growth type of
R dominates [k 7→ k]∼ .
Proof. First, let M be infinite. Then, according to Corollary 8.14, the
sequence (BS (k))k∈N0 is strictly increasing with respect to ⊆. Hence,
because BS (0) = {m0 }, for each k ∈ N0 , we have γS (k) = |BS (k)| ≥
k + 1. In conclusion, γS dominates [k 7→ k] and hence γ(R) dominates
[k 7→ k]∼ .
Secondly, let M be finite. Then, according to Corollary 8.12, we
have R = [1]∼ . Hence, according to Item 1 of Example 7.7, the cell
space R does not dominate [k 7→ k]∼ .
Definition 8.17. The cell space R is said to have
(1) exponential growth if and only if its growth type γ(R) is equal
to [exp]∼ ;
(2) sub-exponential growth if and only if it does not have exponential growth;
(3) polynomial growth if and only if there is a non-negative integer
d ∈ N0 such that γS is dominated by [k 7→ k d ].
(4) intermediate growth if and only if it has sub-exponential growth
but not polynomial growth.
Lemma 8.18. Let R have polynomial growth. The cell space R has
sub-exponential growth.
Proof. There is a d ∈ N0 such that [k 7→ k d ] < γS . Hence, according to
Lemma 7.8, γS ≁ exp. In conclusion, γ(R) 6= [exp]∼ .
RIGHT AMENABILITY AND GROWTH
27
9. Growth Rates
In this section, let R = ((M, G, ⊲), (m0 , {gm0 ,m }m∈M )) be a cell space
such that there is a finite and symmetric right generating set S of R.
In Definition 9.2 we define the S-growth rate of R. And in Lemma 9.3
show how that growth rate and exponential growth relate to each other.
p
p
Lemma 9.1. The sequence ( k γS (k))k∈N0 converges to inf k∈N0 k γS (k) ∈
R≥1 .
Proof. According to Corollary 5.15,
γS (k + k ′ ) = |BS (k + k ′ )|
= |BS (k) P BS (k ′ )|
≤ |BS (k)| · |BS (k ′ )|
= γS (k) · γS (k ′ ).
p
Hence, according to [2, Lemma 6.5.1], the sequence ( k γS (k))k∈N0 conp
verges to inf k∈N0 k γS (k). Moreover, because, for each k ∈ N0 , we have
γS (k) ≥ 1, that limit point must be in R≥1 .
p
Definition 9.2. The limit point λS = limk→∞ k γS (k) is called Sgrowth rate of R.
Lemma 9.3. The S-growth rate λS of R is greater than 1 if and only
if the cell space R has exponential growth.
Proof. First, let λS > 1. According to Lemma 9.1, for each k ∈ N0 , we
p
have k γS (k) ≥ λS and hence γS (k) ≥ λkS . Therefore, γS dominates
(_)
(_)
λS and, because λS > 1, the growth function λS is equivalent to exp,
and thus γS dominates exp. Moreover, according to Corollary 8.9, the
growth function γS is dominated by exp. Altogether, γS is equivalent
to exp. In conclusion, γ(R) = [γS ]∼ = [exp]∼ .
Secondly, let γ(R) = [exp]∼ . Then, γS and exp are equivalent. In
particular, γS dominates exp. Hence, there is a α ∈ N+ such that, for
each k ∈ N+ , we have αγS (αk) ≥ exp(k). Therefore, for each k ∈ N+ ,
p
p
√ αk
αk
α γS (αk) = αk αγS (αk)
p
≥ αk exp(k)
28
SIMON WACKER
=
√
α
e.
p
√
Thus, because ( αk α)k∈N+ converges to 1 and ( αk γS (αk))k∈N+ , as subp
√
sequence of ( k γS (k))k∈N0 , converges to λS , we conclude λS ≥ α e >
1.
Corollary 9.4. The S-growth rate λS of R is equal to 1 if and only if
the cell space R has sub-exponential growth.
Proof. This is a direct consequence of Lemma 9.3.
Corollary 9.5. Let S ′ be a finite and symmetric right generating set
of R. The S-growth rate λS of R is equal to 1 or greater than 1 if
and only if the S ′ -growth rate λS ′ of R is equal to 1 or greater than 1
respectively.
Proof. This is a direct consequence of Corollary 9.4 and Lemma 9.3.
10. Amenability, Følner Conditions/Nets, and
Isoperimetric Constants
In this section, let R = ((M, G, ⊲), (m0, {gm0 ,m }m∈M )) be a finitely
right generated cell space such that the stabiliser G0 is finite, and let
S be a finite and symmetric right generating set of R.
In Definition 10.3 we define the S-isoperimetric constant of R, which
measures, broadly speaking, the invariance under P↾M ×S that a finite
subset of M can have, where 0 means maximally and 1 minimally
invariant. In Theorem 10.5 we show that R is right amenable if and
only if a kind of Følner condition holds, which in turn holds if and
only if the S-isoperimetric constant is 0. And in Theorem 10.6 we
characterise right Følner nets using ρ-boundaries.
Remark 10.1. Let g and g′ be two elements of G/G0 , and let A, B,
and C be three sets. Then,
(_ P g)−1 (A r B) = (_ P g)−1 (A) r (_ P g)−1 (B)
and
(_ P g) P g′
−1
(A) = (_ P g)−1 (_ P g′ )−1 (A) .
RIGHT AMENABILITY AND GROWTH
29
Remark 10.2. Let A, B, and C be three finite sets. Then,
|A r B| ≤ |A r C| + |C r B|.
Definition 10.3. Let E be a subset of G/G0 and let F be the set
{F ⊆ M | F is non-empty and finite}. The non-negative real number
S
| e∈E F r (_ P e)−1 (F )|
ιE (R) = inf
F ∈F
|F |
is called E-isoperimetric constant of R.
Lemma 10.4. Let A be a subset of M, let g and g′ be two elements of
G/G0 , and identify M with G/G0 by [m 7→ Gm0 ,m ]. Then,
[
−1
(_ P g)−1 (A)r _ P (g P g′ ) (A) ⊆
(_ P g)−1 Ar(_ P g0 ·g′ )−1 (A) .
g0 ∈G0
Proof. Let m ∈ (_ P g)−1 (A) r (_ P (g P g′ ))−1 (A). Then, according to
Lemma 5.13, there is a g0 ∈ G0 such that (mPg)Pg0 ·g′ = mP(gPg′ ) ∈
/ A.
′
−1
−1
Therefore, m ∈
/ ((_ P g) P g0 · g ) (A) and hence m ∈ (_ P g) (A) r
((_ P g) P g0 · g′ )−1 (A). Moreover, according to Remark 10.1, we have
((_ P g) P g0 · g′ )−1 (A) = (_ P g)−1 ((_ P g0 · g′ )−1 (A)). Thus, according
to Remark 10.1, we have (_ P g)−1 (A) r ((_ P g) P g0 · g′ )−1 (A) =
S
(_ P g)−1 (A r (_ P g0 · g′ )−1 (A)). Hence, m ∈ g0 ∈G0 (_ P g)−1 (A r
(_ P g0 · g′ )−1 (A)).
Theorem 10.5. The following statements are equivalent:
(1) The cell space R is right amenable;
(2) For each positive real number ε ∈ R>0 , there is a non-empty
and finite subset F of M such that
|F r (_ P s)−1 (F )|
(2)
∀s ∈ S :
< ε;
|F |
(3) The isoperimetric constant ιS (R) is 0.
Proof. 1 =⇒ 2. Let R be right amenable. Then, according to [7,
Main Theorem 4], there is a right Følner net in R. Hence, according to
[7, Lemma 9], for each ε ∈ R>0 , there is a non-empty and finite F ⊆ M
such that Eq. (2) holds.
2 =⇒ 1. For each ε ∈ R>0 , let there be a non-empty and finite F ⊆ M
such that Eq. (2) holds. Furthermore, let ε′ ∈ R>0 , let E ⊆ G/G0 be
30
SIMON WACKER
finite, and identify M with G/G0 by [m 7→ Gm0 ,m ]. Then, according to
Lemma 6.7, there is a k ∈ N0 such that
E ⊆ {m ∈ M | ∃{s′i }i∈{1,2,...,k} ⊆ S ′ : (((m0 P s′1 ) P s′2 ) P · · · ) P s′k },
where S ′ = {G0 }∪S. Let ε = ε′ /(|G0 |2 ·k) and let F ⊆ M be non-empty
and finite such that Eq. (2) holds. Furthermore, let e ∈ E. Then, there
is a {s′i }i∈{1,2,...,k} ⊆ S ′ such that (((m0 P s′1 ) P s′2 ) P · · · ) P s′k = e. For
each i ∈ {0, 1, . . . , k}, let mi = (((m0 P s′1 ) P s′2 ) P · · · ) P s′i and let
Fi = (_ P mi )−1 (F ). Note that mk = e and that F0 = F . Then,
according to Remark 10.2,
|F r Fk | = |F0 r Fk |
≤ |F0 r F1 | + |F1 r Fk |
≤ |F0 r F1 | + |F1 r F2 | + |F2 r Fk |
≤ ...
≤
k
X
i=1
|Fi−1 r Fi |.
Let i ∈ {1, 2, . . . , k}. Then, because mi = mi−1 P s′i , we have Fi−1 r
Fi = (_ P mi−1 )−1 (F ) r (_ P (mi−1 P s′i ))−1 (F ). Hence, according to
S
Lemma 10.4, we have Fi−1 r Fi ⊆ g0 ∈G0 (_ P mi−1 )−1 (F r (_ P g0 ·
s′i )−1 (F )). Therefore,
[
(_ P mi−1 )−1 (F r (_ P g0 · s′i )−1 (F ))|
|Fi−1 r Fi | ≤ |
g0 ∈G0
≤
X
g0 ∈G0
|(_ P mi−1 )−1 (F r (_ P g0 · s′i )−1 (F ))|.
Thus, according to [8, Corollary 1],
X
|G0 | · |F r (_ P g0 · s′i )−1 (F )|.
|Fi−1 r Fi | ≤
g0 ∈G0
Hence, because G0 · S ′ ⊆ S ′ , F r (_ P G0 )−1 (F ) = F r F = ∅, and
Eq. (2) holds,
X
|G0 | · ε · |F |
|Fi−1 r Fi | <
g0 ∈G0
= |G0 |2 · ε · |F |
RIGHT AMENABILITY AND GROWTH
= |G0 |2 ·
=
ε′
|F |.
k
31
ε′
· |F |
|G0 |2 · k
Therefore,
k
X
ε′
|F r Fk | ≤
|Fi−1 r Fi | < k |F | = ε′ |F |.
k
i=1
Thus, because Fk = (_ P e)−1 (F ),
|F r (_ P e)−1 (F )|
< ε′ .
|F |
Hence, according to [7, Lemma 3.9], there is a right Følner net in R.
In conclusion, according to [7, Theorem 5.1], the cell space R is right
amenable.
2 =⇒ 3. Let ε′ ∈ R>0 and let ε = ε′ /|S|. Then, there is a non-empty
and finite F ⊆ M such that Eq. (2) holds. Therefore,
S
| s∈S F r (_ P s)−1 (F )| X |F r (_ P s)−1 (F )|
≤
< |S| · ε = ε′ .
|F |
|F |
s∈S
In conclusion, ιS (R) = 0.
3 =⇒ 2. Let ε ∈ R>0 . Then, because ιS (R) = 0, there is a non-empty
and finite F ⊆ M such that
S
| s∈S F r (_ P s)−1 (F )|
< ε.
|F |
S
Hence, for each s ∈ S, because F r (_ P s)−1 (F ) ⊆ s′ ∈S F r (_ P
s′ )−1 (F ),
|F r (_ P s)−1 (F )|
< ε.
|F |
In conclusion, Eq. (2) holds.
Theorem 10.6. Let {Fi }i∈I be a net in {F ⊆ M | F 6= ∅, F finite}
indexed by (I, ≤). It is a right Følner net in R if and only if
(3)
∀ ρ ∈ N0 : lim
i∈I
|∂ρ Fi |
= 0.
|Fi |
32
SIMON WACKER
Proof. First, let {Fi }i∈I be a right Følner net. Furthermore, let ρ be
a non-negative integer. Then, for each index i ∈ I, we have ∂ρ Fi =
∂B(ρ) Fi . And, according to Remark 5.7, the ball B(ρ) is finite. Hence,
according to [8, Theorem 1],
lim
i∈I
|∂B(ρ) Fi |
= 0.
|Fi |
In conclusion, Eq. (3) holds.
Secondly, let Eq. (3) hold. Furthermore, let N be a finite subset of
G/G0 . Then, according to Remark 5.6, there is a non-negative integer
ρ such that N ⊆ B(ρ). Hence, for each index i ∈ I, according to [8,
Item 4 of Lemma 1], we have ∂N Fi ⊆ ∂B(ρ) Fi = ∂ρ Fi . Therefore,
lim
i∈I
|∂N Fi |
= 0.
|Fi |
In conclusion, according to [8, Theorem 1], the net {Fi }i∈I is a right
Følner net.
11. Subexponential Growth and Amenability
In this section, let R = ((M, G, ⊲), (m0, {gm0 ,m }m∈M )) be a finitely
right generated cell space such that the stabiliser G0 is finite.
In Main Theorem 11.1 we show that if R has sub-exponential growth,
then it is right amenable. And in Theorem 11.3 we show that if G has
sub-exponential growth, then so has R.
Lemma 11.1 ([2, Lemma 6.11.1]). Let (rk )k∈N0 be a sequence of positive real numbers. Then,
√
rk+1
lim inf
≤ lim inf k rk .
k→∞
k→∞
rk
Main Theorem 11.1. Let the cell space R have sub-exponential growth.
It is right amenable.
Proof. Let S be a finite and symmetric right generating set of R. According to Lemma 11.1 and Corollary 9.4,
p
γS (k + 1)
1 ≤ lim inf
≤ lim k γS (k) = λS = 1.
k→∞
k→∞
γS (k)
Therefore, lim inf k→∞
γS (k+1)
γS (k)
= 1.
RIGHT AMENABILITY AND GROWTH
33
(k)
< 1 + ε.
Let ε ∈ R>0 . Then, there is a k ∈ N+ such that γSγS(k−1)
Hence, γS (k) − γS (k − 1) < ε · γS (k − 1). Furthermore, let F = BS (k)
and let s ∈ S. Then, according to Lemma 5.8, we have BS (k − 1) ⊆
(_ P s)−1 (F ). Therefore, because BS (k −1) ⊆ F and γS (k −1) ≤ γS (k),
|F r (_ P s)−1 (F )| ≤ |F r BS (k − 1)|
= |F | − |BS (k − 1)|
= γS (k) − γS (k − 1)
< ε · γS (k − 1)
≤ ε · γS (k)
= ε · |F |.
In conclusion, according to Theorem 10.5, the cell space R is right
amenable.
Lemma 11.2. Let the group G be finitely generated. The growth rate
of G dominates the one of R.
Proof. There is a finite and symmetric generating set T of G such that
G0 T ⊆ T . And, according to Lemma 1.4, the set S = {tG0 | t ∈ T } =
{g0 · tG0 | g0 ∈ G0 , t ∈ T } is a finite and symmetric right generating
set of R.
Let k ∈ N0 be a non-negative integer. Furthermore, let m be an element of BR
S (k). Then, there is a non-negative integer j ∈ {0, 1, 2, . . . , k}
and a family {si }i∈{1,2,...,j} of elements in S such that
m = (m0 P s1 ) P s2 P · · · P sj .
And, by the definition of S, there is a family {ti }i∈{1,2,...,j} of elements
in T such that {ti G0 }i∈{1,2,...,j} = {si }i∈{1,2,...,j}. And, because P is a
right semi-action, there is a family {gi,0}i∈{1,2,...,j} of elements in G0
such that
m = (((m0 P s1 ) P s2 ) P · · · ) P sj
= m0 P t1 g2,0 t2 g3,0 t3 · · · gj,0tj G0
= g1,0 t1 g2,0 t2 g3,0 t3 · · · gj,0tj ⊲ m0 ,
34
SIMON WACKER
where g1,0 = gm0 ,m0 . And, because G0 T ⊆ T , the family {gi,0 ti }i∈{1,2,...,j}
G
is one of elements in T . Hence, m ∈ BG
T (j) ⊲ m0 ⊆ BT (k) ⊲ m0 . ThereG
fore, BR
S (k) ⊆ BT (k) ⊲ m0 and thus
G
G
|BR
S (k)| ≤ |BT (k) ⊲ m0 | ≤ |BT (k)|.
Hence, γSR (k) ≤ γTG (k). In conclusion, γTG dominates γSR and thus γ(G)
dominates γ(R).
Theorem 11.3. Let the group G be finitely generated and let it have
sub-exponential growth. The cell space R has sub-exponential growth
and is right amenable.
Proof. According to Lemma 11.2, the cell space R has sub-exponential
growth. Hence, according to Main Theorem 11.1, it is right amenable.
References
[1] Cayley, Arthur (1878). Desiderata and suggestions: No. 2. The Theory of
groups: graphical representation. American Journal of Mathematics 1 (2):
174–176. doi:10.2307/2369306. JSTOR 2369306. In his Collected Mathematical
Papers 10: 403–405.
[2] Ceccherini-Silberstein, Tullio and Coornaert, Michel. Cellular Automata and
Groups. Springer Monographs in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, 2010.
[3] Efremovich, Vadim Arsenyevich: The geometry of proximity. I. Mat. Sbornik
N. S. 31(73), 189–200 (1952)
[4] Gromov, Mikhail Leonidovich: Infinite groups as geometric objects, Proc. Int.
Congress Math. Warsaw 1983 1 (1984), 385-392
[5] Švarc, Albert S.: A volume invariant of coverings. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 105,
32–34 (1955)
[6] Wacker, Simon. Cellular Automata on Group Sets and the Uniform CurtisHedlund-Lyndon Theorem. Cellular Automata and Discrete Complex Systems
(2016), pages 185-198. arXiv:1603.07271 [math.GR].
[7] Wacker, Simon. Right Amenable Left Group Sets and the Tarski-Følner Theorem. Preprint (2016). arXiv:1603.06460 [math.GR].
[8] Wacker, Simon. The Garden of Eden Theorem for Cellular Automata on Group
Sets. Cellular Automata (2016), pages 66-78. arXiv:1603.07272 [math.GR].
Simon Wacker, Department of Informatics, Karlsruhe Institute of
Technology, Am Fasanengarten 5, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
E-mail address: [email protected]
| 4math.GR
|
arXiv:1609.03136v1 [cs.DS] 11 Sep 2016
A Heuristic Method of Generating Diameter 3
Graphs for Order/Degree Problem
Teruaki Kitasuka
Masahiro Iida
Graduate School of Science and Technology
Kumamoto University
Kumamoto 860-8555, Japan
Email: [email protected]
Graduate School of Science and Technology
Kumamoto University
Kumamoto 860-8555, Japan
Email: [email protected]
Abstract—We propose a heuristic method that generates a
graph for order/degree problem. Target graphs of our heuristics
have large order (> 4000) and diameter 3. We describe the observation of smaller graphs and basic structure of our heuristics.
We also explain an evaluation function of each edge for efficient
2-opt local search. Using them, we found the best solutions for
several graphs.
Keywords—order/degree problem, graph generation, Petersen
graph, average shortest path length, 2-opt
I. I NTRODUCTION
One of the famous problems in the field of combinatorics
is the degree/diameter problem [1], [2], [3], [4]. The degree/diameter problem1 is the problem of finding the largest
possible number n(d, k) of nodes in a graph of maximum
degree d and diameter k. The maximum degree of a graph is
the maximum degree of its nodes. The degree of a node is
the number of edges incident to the node. The diameter k of
a graph is the maximum distance between two nodes of the
graph.
On the other hand, the problem of the graph golf 2015
competition [5] is the order/degree problem. The order/degree
problem is the problem of finding a graph that has smallest
diameter k and average shortest path length (ASPL, l) for
a given order and degree. Compared to the degree/diameter
problem, order is given and diameter is not given in the
order/degree problem.
As the organizer of the competition mentioned, the order/degree problem has important role to design networks for
high perfomance computing. Because, the number of nodes
of the network is determined based on design constraints
such as cost, space, budget, and applications. Solutions of
the degree/diameter problem can be used to limited networks
of particular number of nodes. Currently, there is no trivial
way to increase or decrease the number of nodes from the
optimal graph of the degree/diameter problem, while keeping
its diameter close to the optimal graph. For example, Besta and
Hoefler [6] have presented diameter-2 and -3 networks with
particular number of routers, and each endpoint is connected
1 The
Degree/Diameter
Problem,
CombinatoricsWiki,
http:
//combinatoricswiki.org/wiki/The Degree/Diameter Problem#Undirected
graphs
to a router. The number of endpoints can be changed in a
range. Matsutani et al. [7] have reduced the communication
latency of 3D NoCs, by adding randomized shortcut links.
We try to solve some order/degree problems. There are two
contributions in this paper. 1) Showing heuristic algorithm to
create a graph for given order and degree (Sec. III). Using this
algorithm, we have created two best-known graphs; one has
order n = 4096 and degree d = 60, the other has n = 4096
and d = 64. After 2015 competition, we also have created
other graph of order n = 10000 and degree d = 60. 2)
Developing evaluation function of edges for 2-opt local search
(Sec. IV). Local search starts with a graph that has the given
number of nodes and satisfies degree constraints. Swapping
two edges is accepted, if swapped graph G0 is better than
the previous graph G in terms of diameter and/or ASPL. For
example, if two edges a-b and c-d are selected for swapping
from graph G, we try to swap two edges such that two edges
a-b and c-d are removed from and two edges a-c and b-d are
added to the graph G. If diameter and/or ASPL of swapped
graph G0 is smaller than G, this swap is accepted. We call
the evaluation function “edge importance”. Lower-importance
edge pair is selected as the candidate of swapping earlier than
other pairs. For the existence of local minimum graph, we
need to temporarily accept worse graphs in searching graph
of order n = 256 and degree d = 16.
II. O BSERVATION OF S MALL O RDER G RAPHS
The observation of small order graphs brings us the idea of
the heuristic algorithm shown in Sec. III. At the beginning of
the 2015 competition, we drew graphs with small order and
degree. The first graph is order n = 16 and degree d = 3 as
shown in Fig. 1. The second one is order n = 16 and degree
d = 4 as shown in Fig. 2.
The diameters of these two graphs are three (k = 3).
Through drawing these two graphs, we found that these graphs
contain many pentagons (5-node cycles), no or small number
of squares (4-node cycles), and no triangle (3-node cycle). In
Fig. 1, there is no triangle and no square. No triangle and four
squares exist in Fig. 2. We think triangles and squares cause
diameter ASPL (average shortest path length) to be larger
for the case of k = 3. Through this observation, we define
increasing the number of pentagons as our policy in Section
0
13
10
7
2
5
6
3
4
12
11
5
11
14
9
2
13
1
12
6
10
8
3
9
(a) ring layout
8
7
(a) ring layout
11
12
13
14
15
0
1
2
3
4
0
1
8
9
5
6
7
8
9
11
12
13
14
15
11
1
2
3
4
0
0
1
1
14
4
15
0
15
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
10
(b) pentagon (5-node cycle) layout
15
Fig. 1. The best known graph with order n = 16 and degree d = 4
III. In the degree/diameter problem, pentagons are appeared
in the graphs of diameter k = 2, e.g., Petersen graph (shown
in Fig. 3) and Hoffman-Singleton graph (n = 50 and d = 7).
(b) pentagon (5-node cycle) layout
3
A. Policy and Outline of Heuristic Algorithm
2
Based on the observation of small order graphs described in
Sec. II, we determine the outline of our heuristic algorithm as
following two steps. 1) If target diameter is k, we connect
small order graphs such that their diameter is k − 1. For
example, if the target diameter k = 3 and order n = 10000, the
1000 Petersen graphs (Fig. 3, diameter k = 2) are connected.
2) We try to increase the number of (2k−1)-node cycles, when
edges are added. For graphs of k = 3, we try to increase the
number of pentagons (5-node cycles).
Outline of our heuristic algorithm is shown in Algorithm 1.
In the remaining of the paper, we discuss only k = 3 graphs.
Our algorithm generates a graph which diameter is almost 3,
for given order and degree.
8
Algorithm 1 Outline of graph generation algorithm
1: procedure G RAPH G ENERATER (order n, degree d)
2:
Create a base graph G0 , such that order of G0 is n
3:
Create a graph G, by greedily adding edges one by
one to G0
4:
Return the graph G
5: end procedure
4
0
III. H EURISTIC A LGORITHM
15
5
14
1
9
8
7
12
6
11
13
15
10
3
2
6
13
1
2
3
4
14
15
8
7
11
9
(c) square (4-node cycle) layout
Fig. 2. The best known graph with order n = 10 and degree d = 3
B. Create a Base Graph G0
A base graph G0 = (V, E0 ) has n nodes, i.e. |V | = n.
The graph G0 is a connected graph, but its degree is five.
Most nodes have five edges. Other nodes, i.e., some border
and anomalous nodes have four edges.
Graph G0 contains multiple Petersen graphs. The Petersen
graph GP , which is shown in Fig. 3, is one of well-known
Moore graphs [3], and has ten nodes and degree d = 3. The diameter of Petersen graph is two. When the nodes are numbered
in Fig. 3, fifteen edges of the Petersen graph are described as
0
0
5
4
1
8
7
6
7
9
10
1
9
8
2
3
5
6
4
3
Fig. 3. The Petersen graph (n = 10, d = 3)
2
Fig. 5. The 11-node graph (n = 11, d = 4) for base graphs
k-th Petersen graph
9
8
7
6
5
0
1
2
3
4
9
8
7
6
5
0
1
2
3
4
(k+1)th Petersen graph
Fig. 4. Connecting two adjacent Petersen graphs
follows, for i ∈ {0, 1, 2, 3, 4} and j ∈ {5, 6, 7, 8, 9}.
(i, i + 1 mod 5)
(i, (2i mod 5) + 5)
(j, (j + 1 mod 5) + 5)
If a given order n is multiple of ten, we generate (n/10)
Petersen graphs, GP k (k = 1, 2, 3, . . . , n/10). Adjacent
Petersen graphs, GP k and GP (k+1) , are connected as shown
in Fig. 4 by C ONNECT procedure in Algorithm 2. Fig. 4
shows only edges crossing two Petersen graphs. In the case
of n = 10000, we generate 1000 Petersen graphs, and k-th
graph are connected with (k − 1)-th and (k + 1)-th graph for
1 < k < 1000.
Algorithm 2 Create a base graph G0
1: procedure C REATE BASE G RAPH (n)
2:
for each k ∈ {1, . . . , (n/10)} do
3:
Create k-th petersen graphs
4:
end for
5:
for each k ∈ {1, . . . , (n/10) − 1} do
6:
C ONNECT(k)
7:
end for
8: end procedure
9: procedure C ONNECT (k)
10:
Connect k-th and (k + 1)-th Petersen graphs as shown
in Fig. 4
11: end procedure
When there is a remainder r > 0 divided by ten, i.e.,
n = 10 · bn/10c + r, we replace r Petersen graphs with r
11-node graphs. The 11-node graph is the subgraph of Fig. 2.
We heuristically select eleven nodes, 5, 6, 7, . . . , 15 from the
graph of Fig. 2. When we connect a 11-node graph with
adjacent Petersen graphs, we ignore node 10 and other ten
nodes are connected similar to Fig. 4. The eleven nodes graph
is shown in Fig. 5, nodes are renumbered, except for node 10.
Nodes 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 in Fig. 2 are renumbered
to 2, 3, 4, 0, 1, 6, 7, 8, 9, 5 in Fig. 5, respectively.
The base graph G0 is generated by C REATE BASE G RAPH
procedure in Algorithm 2. The base graph G0 has n nodes.
Each node of G0 has five edges, except for nodes in the first
and the last Petersen graphs and node 10 of 11-node graphs.
These exceptional nodes have just four edges.
C. Greedily Add Edges One by One to G0
In this step, we greedily add edges one by one to the base
graph G0 . Our policies to add edges are the followings.
1) Increase the number of pentagons in the graph, to create
a graph such that its diameter becomes three and its
ASPL is close to two.
2) Add an edge, which has the smallest degree node on
one side.
3) No track back, i.e., never remove edges from the graph.
Under the policy 1), our heuristic searches two nodes such
that distance of them is four, and adds an edge between these
two nodes. By adding the edge, the number of pentagons is
increased. Even if the small-degree graph of n = 16 and
d = 4 in Fig. 2, there are many pentagons those include
a particular edge. For example, an edge 1-2 is contained in
eight pentagons; 1-2-3-4-0, 1-2-6-7-0, 1-2-15-14-0, 1-2-3-8-9,
1-2-3-13-12, 1-2-6-5-9, 1-2-6-7-12, and 1-2-6-10-9.
The policy 2) is employed to uniformly increase the degree
of nodes and save computation time. Our heuristic maintains
the nodes that have the smallest degree, and selects a node
from them as one side of a new edge. A node of the other side
is selected based on the policy 1). Although we can select the
new edge from all possible pair of nodes, to save computation
time, our heuristic limits search space by fixing one side of
new edge.
The policy 3) also saves computation time. As another
reason, we do not find any effective evaluation function to
track back.
Here, we explain this step in Algorithm 3. In each loop
iteration of lines 3 to 17, two nodes i and j are selected and
add an edge i-j to the graph. Node i is chosen from the nodes
of the smallest degree in G at line 4, based on policy 2). d(i, j)
denotes the distance between two nodes i and j. In the loop
of lines 6 to 14, candidates of node j are evaluated, based on
policy 1). After evaluation, node j that satisfies two following
conditions (1) and (2) is selected in line 15, and an edges i-j
is added to graph G in the next line. J 0 is the subset of J
such that each node in J 0 satisfies condition (1). We have no
particular tie-breaking rule.
p1 (j)
=
p2 (j)
=
min p1 (j 0 )
(1)
max p2 (j 0 )
(2)
j 0 ∈J
j 0 ∈J 0
The C OUNT PATHS function is used for the evaluation of
j ∈ J. C OUNT PATHS(i, j) roughly counts the number of paths
between two nodes i and j, those distance are three. Dm (i)
is the set of nodes distant m from node i, i.e., for every node
k ∈ Dm (i), k satisfies d(i, k) = m. For example, every node
k ∈ D1 (i) ∩ D2 (j) satisfy d(i, k) = 1 and d(k, j) = 2. p in
line 21 is close to the twice of the number of 4-node paths.
Algorithm 3 Greedily add edges, one by one to G0
1: procedure A DD E DGES (n, d, G0 )
2:
G ← G0
3:
while edge can be added do
4:
Select a node i from the smallest degree nodes
5:
Compute node set J such that d(i, j) > 2
6:
for each node j ∈ J do
7:
p1 (j) = C OUNT PATHS(i, j)
8:
p2 (j) = 0
9:
for each k ∈ j’s neighbors do
10:
if C OUNT PATHS(i, k) > p2 (j) then
11:
p2 (j) = C OUNT PATHS(i, k)
12:
end if
13:
end for
14:
end for
15:
Select j ∈ J that satisfies conditions (1) and (2)
16:
Add an edge i-j to graph G
17:
end while
18:
If degree of several nodes are less than d, add several
edges between them
19: end procedure
20: function C OUNT PATHS (i, j)
21:
p = |D1 (i) ∩ D2 (j)| + |D2 (i) ∩ D1 (j)| . Roughly
count the number of paths with distance 3 between node
i and j, for graph G
22: end function
D. Generated Graphs
Diameter k and ASPL l of generated graphs are shown in
Table I. Fortunately, two graphs of n = 4096 are the new
records in the competition. The graph of n = 256 has the same
diameter, but longer ASPL than the best record l = 2.09262
TABLE I
G RAPHS GENERATED BY THE HEURISTIC ALGORITHM
order n
256
4096
4096
10000
10000
diameter k
3
3
3
3
3
degree d
16
60
64
60
64
ASPL l
2.12757
2.295275
2.242228
2.648980
2.611310
note
not submitted
*1
*1
*2
*3
*1: None submits smaller graph in the competition.
*2: A smaller-ASPL graph is created after competition. The winner’s graph of the competition has
l = 2.650157.
*3: The graph is created after competition. However,
the winner’s graph of the competition (l = 2.609927)
has smaller ASPL than this.
a
c
a
c
b
d
b
d
Fig. 6. Swap two edges a-b and c-d into a-d and b-c. (We assume degree
d = 9 and other nodes are not drawn. There is another swap into a-c and
b-d for these edges)
and two competitors’ records. For two graphs of n = 10000,
our first implementation is too slow and can not finish before
the deadline of the 2015 competition. After the competition,
we reimplement the program and get the results as shown in
Table I.
IV. A T ECHNIQUE OF 2-O PT L OCAL S EARCH
A. Edge Importance Function
After a graph is created by heuristic algorithm described
in Sec. III for a given order and degree, we start 2-opt
local search. 2-opt is the basic and widely used local search
heuristic [8]. It is used for traveling salesperson problem (TSP)
and others.
In this section, we explain edge importance which is used
to prioritize edge combinations for 2-opt local search. 2-opt
algorithm slightly modifies a given graph recursively. The
modification of 2-opt is swapping two edges. An example of
swapping two edges a-b and c-d into a-d and b-c is shown in
Fig. 6. Diameter and ASPL of pre-swap graph G = (V, E)
and post-swap graph G0 = (V, E 0 ) are compared with each
other. If diameter and/or ASPL of G0 is smaller than G, this
swap is accepted.
2-opt local search is time-consuming task. There are many
ways to reduce computation time. Even if we search a graph of
order n = 256 and degree d = 16, there are 2048 edges in the
graph. The number of edge pairs is about 2 × 106 . Generally,
(n−2)d 1
the number of edge pairs is about nd
· 2 = O(n2 d2 ).
2 ·
2
For each swapped graph, we need to calculate diameter and
ASPL. We adopt two techniques to save computation time.
One is edge importance, and the other is fast ASPL calculation
for 2-opt.
i
distance from i = d
j
i
k
j
distance from i = d + 1
importance for i
i
j’
k
0
1/2
(no importance) (2 = # of parents)
j
k
1
Fig. 7. Edge importance of an edge j-k for node i
Our edge importance (or edge impact) is a value given
to each edge of a graph. As an intuitive explanation, less
important edges probably be removed from the graph with
little increase of ASPL than other edges. Then, we give higher
priority to less important edges, when we select an edge pair
for swap.
The edge importance of an edge e = j-k is defined by the
following function.
X
f (e) = f (j-k) =
f1 (i, j-k),
there are two combinations2 of swapping, 1) a-c and b-d (G0
of line 7) and 2) a-d and b-c (G00 of line 9) . Diameter and
ASPL of both G0 and G00 are calculated. The loop of lines 4 to
13 implies that edge importance is reused for swapped graphs.
In our experience, after fifty swaps, ordering still valuable to
find smaller ASPL graph.
Algorithm 4 2-opt local search
1: procedure M ULTIPLE 2 OPT (G)
2:
Calculate edge importance of all edges in G
3:
Sort edges by edge importance
4:
while timeout do
5:
repeat
6:
Select an edge pair (ei , ej ) in a particular order
7:
Generate swapped graph G0
8:
Calculate diameter and ASPL of G0
9:
Generate another swapped graph G00
10:
Calculate diameter and ASPL of G00
11:
until G0 or G00 has smaller diameter or ASPL than
G
12:
Copy G0 or G00 to G
13:
end while
14: end procedure
i∈V
where f1 (i, j-k) is the importance of edge j-k for node i.
The examples of f1 (i, j-k) is shown in Fig. 7. We assume
f1 (i, j-k) = f1 (i, k-j) (symmetricity) and divide two cases of
f1 (i, j-k) as follows.
• If two nodes j and k have the same distance from i, i.e.,
d(i, j) = d(i, k), then f1 (i, j-k) = 0. (left of Fig. 7)
• If two nodes j and k have the different distance from i,
i.e., d(i, j) + 1 = d(i, k), then 0 < f1 (i, j-k) ≤ 1. We
define node set J, each of which has an edge to k and
its distance from i is equal to d(i, j).
J = {j 0 |j 0 ∈ V and d(i, j 0 ) = d(i, j) and d(j 0 , k) = 1}
Using J, f1 (i, j-k) is defined as follows.
f1 (i, j-k) =
1
|J|
The center of Fig. 7 shows a subcase of |J| = 2, and
the right of it shows the other subcase of |J| = 1. Note
that, this case includes the case of i = j. If i = j, then
|J| = 1 by the definition.
B. Order of Edges Pairs for Local Search
Two lower-importance edges are the candidate of swapping
for 2-opt local search. All edges are sorted by edge importance and denoted by e0 , e1 , . . . , e|E|−1 . The edge e0 has the
smallest importance.
The 2-opt local search algorithm is shown in Algorithm 4
The loop of lines 5 to 11 is the main loop of local search.
Line 6 is the important point using edge importance. We tries
several orders to select a pair, which are described in the next
paragraph. For pair ei (= a-b) and ej (= c-d) selected in line 6,
We heuristically employ two searching orders of line 6 in
Algorithm 4. Both orders satisfy (ei , ej ) < (ei , ek ) < (ej , ek )
for i < j < k. We think the order of the smallest first is better
than it of triangle, empirically.
• the smallest first: (ei , el ) < (ej , ek ) for i < j < k < l.
(e0 , e1 ), (e0 , e1 ), (e0 , e2 ), . . . , (e0 , e|E|−1 ),
(e1 , e2 ), (e1 , e3 ), (e1 , e4 ), . . . , (e1 , e|E|−1 ),
(e2 , e3 ), (e2 , e4 ), (e2 , e5 ), . . . , (e2 , e|E|−1 ),
...,
(ei , ei+1 ), (ei , ei+2 ), (ei , ei+3 ), . . . , (ei , e|E|−1 ),
...
• triangle: (ei , el ) > (ej , ek ) for i < j < k < l.
(e0 , e1 ),
(e0 , e2 ), (e1 , e2 ),
(e0 , e3 ), (e1 , e3 ), (e2 , e3 ),
...,
(e0 , ei ), (e1 , ei ), (e2 , ei ), . . . , (ei−1 , ei ),
...
Since ASPL calculation is time-consuming task, we additionally design ASPL recalculation method for 2-opt local
search. The method stores the distance matrix of graph G and
update the matrix for swapped graph G0 . We can elimiate recalculation of the distance between nodes which the swap does
not affect.
C. Graph Instances
We run local search program during the competition and
after competition. We show the smallest graph that we found
in Table II. These graphs probably are the best-known graphs
2 If graph G already has one of edges a-c or b-d (a-d or b-c), we skip the
swap since the degree of two nodes are decreased by one.
diameter k
3
3
3
3
ASPL l
2.09069
2.295216
2.242170
2.648977
l of Table I
2.12757
2.295275
2.242228
2.648980
2.0926
Note: all graphs may be the best-known graphs. The
winner’s graph of the competition has larger ASPL
than these.
V. C ONCLUSION
In this paper, we explained the heuristic algorithm that
creates a graph which has small average shortest path length
(ASPL) for diameter 3 graphs. The algorithm intends to
increase the number of pentagons (5-node cycles). Through the
observation of small order graphs which has diameter 3, we
focused on the number of pentagons. The heuristic algorithm
can create two best-known graphs at the graph golf 2015
competition, and a best-known graph after the competition.
These three graphs have order n = 4096 and degree d = 60,
n = 4096 and d = 64, and n = 10000 and d = 60.
We also explained the technique of 2-opt local search to
reduce ASPL of a graph. The technique is based on the
evaluation function called edge importance (or edge impact).
Edges which have smaller importance compared to other edges
are the good candidates for swap of 2-opt. We applied this
technique to the graph of n = 256 and d = 16, and find a
best-known graph after competition.
As future work, we will try to find more elegant heuristic
to create a small ASPL graph, for not only diameter 3 graphs
but also larger diameter graphs. Data structures for fast ASPL
computation also should be explored.
500
2.0924
400
2.0922
300
2.092
200
2.0918
100
2.0916
0
100
200
300
400
0
500
Sequence of swapped graphs
(a) first half (ASPL: 2.09163 < l < 2.09277)
2.092
ASPL
Importance order of higher flipped edge
Importance order of lower flipped edge
2.0918
ASPL
for these four combinations of order and degree. For graphs
of order n = 4096 and n = 10000, Algorithm 4 is directly
applied.
For the graph of order n = 256 and degree d = 16, our
graphs fall into local optimal many times. To find graphs
of smaller ASPL, we accept worse post-graph G0 than preswap graph G in 2-opt local search. Fig. 8 shows the search
history of the last 1000 graphs before reaching the best-known
graph of l = 2.09069. Many branches from each graph is
omitted. In this figure, we show ASPL of each graph and
order of edges that we swapped. The order of swapped edges
is distributed from 0 to 620, i.e., swapped edges are two of
e0 , e1 , e2 , . . . , e620 in each graph. To reach the best-known
graph, we need to run local search at least in the range of edge
pair (ei , ej ) for 0 ≤ i ≤ 153 and 1 ≤ j ≤ 620). This range
contains only 4 % of all edge pairs. So, the edge importance
seems to be valuable function to prioritize edges for swapping.
We briefly explain the distribution of order of swapped edges.
Since two edges are selected for each swap in Fig. 8, the total
number of selected edges are 2000 for 1000 swaps. The half
of these edges have the order smaller than 8. The order smaller
than 108 contains 90% of these edges.
600
700
600
2.0916
500
2.0914
400
2.0912
300
2.091
200
2.0908
100
2.0906
500
600
700
800
900
Importance order of edge
degree d
16
60
64
60
ASPL
order n
256
4096
4096
10000
ASPL
Importance order of higher flipped edge
Importance order of lower flipped edge
Importance order of edge
2.0928
TABLE II
G RAPHS BY LOCAL SEARCHING AFTER 2015 COMPETITION
0
1000
Sequence of swapped graphs
(b) last half (ASPL: 2.09068 < l < 2.09186)
Fig. 8. Local search history of 1000 graphs of order n = 256 and degree
d = 16
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work was partially supported by JSPS KAKENHI
Grant Number 26330107.
R EFERENCES
[1] P. Erdös, S. Fajtlowicz, and A.J. Hoffman, “Maximum Degree in Graphs
of Diameter 2,” Networks, vol. 10, pp. 87–90, John Wiley & Sons, 1980.
[2] E. Loz and J. Širáň, “New Record Graphs in the Degree-Diameter
Problem,” Australasian Journal of Combinatorics, vol. 41, pp. 63–80,
2008.
[3] M. Miller and J. Širáň, “Moore Graphs and Beyond: A Survey of the
Degree/Diameter Problem,” Electronic Journal of Combinatorics, vol. 20,
no. 2, #DS14v2, 92 pages, 2013.
[4] G. Exoo and R. Jajcay, “Dynamic Cage Survey,” Electronic Journal of
Combinatorics, #DS16, 55 pages, 2013.
[5] M. Koibuchi, I. Fujiwara, S. Fujita, K. Nakano, T. Uno, T. Inoue, and
K. Kawarabayashi, “Graph Golf: THe Order/degree Problem Competition,” http://research.nii.ac.jp/graphgolf/
[6] M. Besta and T. Hoefler, “Slim Fly: A Cost Effective Low-Diameter Network Topology,” Proc. of International Conference on High Performance
Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis (SC ’14), pp. 348–359,
Nov. 2014.
[7] H. Matsutani, M. Koibuchi, I. Fujiwara, T. Kagami, Y. Take, T. Kuroda,
P. Bogdan, R. Marculescu, and H. Amano, “Low-Latency Wireless 3D
NoCs via Randomized Shortcut Chips,” Proc. of the conference on
Design, Automation & Test (DATE ’14), Mar. 2014.
[8] M. Englert, H. Röglin, and B. Vöcking, “Worst Case and Probabilistic
Analysis of the 2-Opt Algorithm for the TSP,” Proc. of 18th annual ACMSIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms (SODA ’07), pp. 1295–1304,
Jan. 2007.
| 8cs.DS
|
Consistency of the plug-in functional predictor of the
Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process in Hilbert and Banach spaces
Javier Álvarez-Liébana1 , Denis Bosq2 and M. Dolores Ruiz-Medina1
arXiv:1706.06354v1 [math.ST] 20 Jun 2017
21st June 2017
1
Department of Statistics and O. R., University of Granada, Spain.
LSTA, Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris 6, Paris, France.
E-mail: [email protected]
2
Summary
New results on functional prediction of the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process in an autoregressive Hilbert-valued
and Banach-valued frameworks are derived. Specifically, consistency of the maximum likelihood estimator of the
autocorrelation operator, and of the associated plug-in predictor is obtained in both frameworks.
Key words: Autoregressive Hilbertian processes; Banach-valued autoregressive processes; consistency;
maximum likelihood parameter estimator; Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process.
1
Introduction
This paper derives new results in the context of linear processes in function spaces. An extensive literature has been developed in this context, in the last few decades (see, for example, Bosq (2000);
Ferraty and Vieu (2006); Ramsay and Silverman (2005), among others). In particular, the problem of
functional prediction of linear processes in Hilbert and Banach spaces has been widely addressed. We refer
to the reader to the papers by: Bensmain and Mourid (2003); Bosq (1996); Bosq (2002); Bosq (2004);
Bosq (2007); Dedecker and Merlevede (2003); Dehling and Sharipov (2005); Glendinning and Fleet (2007);
Guillas (2000); Guillas (2001); Kargin and Onatski (2008); Labbas and Mourid (2003); Marion and Pumo (2004);
Mas (2002); Mas (2004); Mas (2007); Mas and Menneteau (2003); Mas and Pumo (2007); Menneteau (2005);
Mourid (2002); Mourid (2004); Mokhtari and Mourid (2002); Pumo (1998); Rachedi (2004); Rachedi (2005);
Rachedi and Mourid (2003); Ruiz-Medina (2012); Turbillon, Marion and Pumo (2007); Turbillon et. al (2008),
and the references therein. In the above-mentioned papers, different projection methodologies have been
adopted in the derivation of the main asymptotic properties of the formulated functional parameter estimators and predictors. Particularly, Bosq (2000) and Bosq and Blanke (2007) apply Functional Principal
Component Analysis; Antoniadis, Paparoditis and Sapatinas (2006) and Antoniadis and Sapatinas (2003)
consider wavelet bases; Laukaitis, Vasilecas and Laukaitis (2009) propose wavelet estimation methods.
1
Applications of these functional estimation results can be found in the papers by: Antoniadis and Sapatinas (2003);
Damon and Guillas (2002); Hormann and Kokoszka (2011); Laukaitis (2008); Ruiz-Medina and Salmern (2009),
among others.
We pay attention here to the problem of functional prediction of the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck (O.U.)
process (see, for example, Uhlenbeck and Ornstein (1930), and Wang and Uhlenbeck (1945), for its introduction and properties). See also Doob (1942) for the classical definition of O.U. process from the
Langevin (linear) stochastic differential equation. We can find in Kutoyants (2004) and Liptser and Shiraev (2001)
an explicit expression of the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) of the scale parameter θ, characterizing its covariance function. Its strong consistency is proved, for instance, in Kleptsyna and Le Breton (2002).
We formulate here the O.U. process as an Autoregressive Hilbertian process of order one (ARH(1) process), and as an Autoregressive Banach -valued process of order one (ARB(1) process). Consistency of
the MLE of θ is applied to prove consistency of the corresponding MLE of the autocorrelation operator
of the O.U. process. We adopt the methodology applied in Bosq (1991), since our interest relies on
forecasting the values of the O.U. process over an entire time interval. Specifically, considering the O.U.
process {ξt }t∈R , on the basic probability space (Ω, A, P ), we can define
0 ≤ t ≤ h, n ∈ Z,
Xn (t) = ξnh+t ,
(1)
satisfying
Xn (t)
= ξnh+t =
Z
nh+t
e−θ(nh+t−s) dWs = ρθ (Xn−1 ) (t) + εn (t) ,
−∞
n ∈ Z,
(2)
with
ρθ (x) (t) = e
−θt
x (h) ,
ρθ (Xn−1 ) (t) = e
−θt
Z
nh
e
−θ(nh−s)
dWs ,
εn (t) =
−∞
Z
nh+t
e−θ(nh+t−s) dWs ,
nh
(3)
for 0 ≤ t ≤ h. Thus, X = (Xn , n ∈ Z) satisfies the ARH(1) equation (2) (see also equation (5) below for
its general definition). The real separable Hilbert space H is given by H = L2 [0, h] , β[0,h] , λ + δ(h) ,
where β[0,h] is the Borel σ-algebra generated by the subintervals in [0, h] , λ is the Lebesgue measure,
and δ(h) (s) = δ (s − h) is the Dirac measure at point h. The associated norm
kf kH=L2 ([0,h],β[0,h] ,λ+δ(h) ) =
s
Z
h
f 2 (t)dt + f 2 (h)
0
establishes the equivalent classes of functions given by the relationship f ∼λ+δ(h) g if and only if
2
λ + δ(h) ({t : f (t) 6= g (t)}) = 0, with
λ + δ(h) ({t : f (t) 6= g (t)}) = 0 ⇔ λ ({t : f (t) 6= g (t)}) = 0 and f (h) = g (h) ,
(4)
where, as before, δ(h) is the Dirac measure. We will prove, in Lemma 1 below, that X = (Xn , n ∈ Z),
constructed in (1) from the O.U. process, satisfying equations (2)–(3), is the unique stationary solution
to equation (2), in the space H = L2 [0, h] , β[0,h] , λ + δ(h) , admitting a MAH(∞) representation.
Similarly, in Lemma 4 below, we will prove that X = (Xn , n ∈ Z), constructed in (1) from the O.U.
process, satisfying equations (2)–(3), is the unique stationary solution to equation (2), admitting a
MAB(∞) representation, in the space B = C ([0, h]) , the Banach space of continuous functions, whose
support is the interval [0, h] , with the supremum norm.
The main results of this paper provide the almost surely convergence to ρθ of the MLE ρθb of ρθ ,
in the norm of L(H), the space of bounded linear operators in the Hilbert space H (respectively, in
the norm of L(B), the space of bounded linear operators in the Banach space B). The convergence in
probability of the associated plug-in ARH(1) and ARB(1) predictors, i.e., the convergence in probability
of ρθb(Xn−1 ) to ρθ (Xn−1 ) in H and B, respectively, is proved as well.
The outline of this paper is as follows. In Section 2, the main results of this paper are obtained.
Specifically, Section 2.1 provides the definition of O.U. process as an ARH(1) process. Strong consistency
in L(H) of the estimator of the autocorrelation operator is derived in Section 2.2. Consistency in H of
the associated plug-in ARH(1) predictor is then established in Section 2.3. The corresponding results in
Banach spaces are given in Section 2.4. For illustration purposes, a simulation study is undertaken in
Section 3. Final comments can be found in Section 4. (The basic preliminary elements applied in the
proof of the main results of this paper and the proof of Lemma 1 can be found in the supplementary
material).
2
Prediction of O.U. process in Hilbert and Banach spaces
In this section, we consider H to be a real separable Hilbert space. Recall that a zero-mean ARH(1)
process X = (Xn , n ∈ Z), on the basic probability space (Ω, A, P ), satisfies (see Bosq (2000))
Xn = ρ (Xn−1 ) + εn ,
n ∈ Z,
(5)
where ρ denotes the autocorrelation operator of process X. Here, ε = (εn , n ∈ Z) is assumed to be
a strong-white noise, i.e., ε is a Hilbert-valued zero-mean stationary process, with independent and
identically distributed components in time, and with σ 2 = Ekεn k2H < ∞, for all n ∈ Z.
3
2.1 O.U. process as ARH(1) process
As commented in the Introduction, equations (1)–(3) provide the definition of O.U. process as an ARH(1)
process, with H = L2 [0, h] , β[0,h] , λ + δ(h) . The norm in the space H = L2 [0, h] , β[0,h] , λ + δ(h) of
ρθ (x), with ρθ introduced in (3) and x ∈ H, is given by
kρθ (x)k2H
=
Z
h
2
|ρθ (x) (t) | d λ + δ(h) (t) =
0
Z
0
h
|ρθ (x) (t) |2 dt + |ρθ (x) (h) |2 ,
(6)
for each h strictly positive. The following lemma provides, for each k ≥ 1, the exact value of the norm
of ρkθ , in the space of bounded linear operators on L2 [0, h] , β[0,h] , λ + δ(h) . As a direct consequence,
the existence of k0 such that kρkθ kL(H) < 1, for k ≥ k0 , is also derived for θ > 0.
Lemma 1 Let us consider, for n ∈ Z, Xn satisfying equations (1)–(3). For each k ≥ 1, the norm of ρkθ
is given by
kρkθ kL(H)
Furthermore, for k ≥ k0 =
=
1
θ
r
+1
e−2θ(k−1)h
+
1 + e−2θh (2θ − 1)
= e−θ(k−1)h kρθ kL(H) .
2θ
(7)
kρkθ kL(H) < 1,
(8)
,
where [t]+ denotes the closest upper integer of t, for every t ∈ R+ .
The proof of this lemma can be found in the supplementary material.
Remark 1 From equation (8), applying Theorem 3.1. in Bosq (2000), p. 74, Lemma 1 implies that
X = (Xn , n ∈ Z), constructed in (1) from O.U. process, defines the unique stationary solution to
equation (2) in the space H = L2 [0, h] , β[0,h] , λ + δ(h) , admitting the MAH(∞) representation
Xn =
+∞
X
ρkθ (εn−k ) ,
n ∈ Z, ρθ ∈ L (H) .
k=0
(9)
k
Remark 2 Note that, for all x ∈ H, and k ≥ 2, kρkθ kL(H) ≤ kρθ kL(H) .
2.2 Functional parameter estimation and consistency
We now prove strong consistency of the estimator ρθbn of operator ρθ in L(H), with, as before,
H = L2 [0, h] , β[0,h] , λ + δ(h) , and θbn denoting the MLE of θ, based on the observation of O.U. process
on the interval [0, T ], with T = nh. Note that, from equation (3), for all x ∈ H, and for a given sample
b
size n, ρθbn (x) = e−θn t x (h) , where the MLE of θ is given, for T = nh, by
ξ2
θbT
=
ξ2
1 + T0 − TT
,
R
2 T 2
ξ
dt
t
T 0
4
T > 0,
(10)
with ξt , t ∈ [0, T ], being the observed values of the O.U. process over the interval [0, T ]. Thus, ρθbn is
introduced in an abstract way, since it can only be explicitly computed, for each particular function
x ∈ H considered. However, the norm kρθ − ρθbn kL(H) is explicitly computed in equation (13) below.
The following results will be applied in the proof of Proposition 1.
Lemma 2 If t ∈ [0, +∞), it holds that |e−ut − e−vt | ≤ |u − v|t, for any u, v ≥ 0.
The proof of this lemma is given in the supplementary material.
Theorem 1 (see Kleptsyna and Le Breton (2002), Proposition 2.2, p. 4, and Kutoyants (2004), p. 63 and p. 117).
The MLE of θ defined in equation (10) is strongly consistent, i.e.,
lim θbT = θ
T →∞
almost surely.
(11)
The proof follows from Ibragimov-Khasminskii’s Theorem.
Proposition 1 Let H be the space L2 [0, h] , β[0,h] , λ + δ(h) . Then, the estimator ρθbn of operator ρθ ,
based on the MLE θbn of θ, is strongly consistent in L (H) , i.e.,
kρθ − ρθbn kL(H) →a.s. 0.
(12)
Proof. The following straightforward almost surely identities are obtained:
kρθ − ρθbn kL(H)
=
sup
k ρθ − ρθb (x) kH
n
kxkH
v
uZ h
u
2
|
ρ
−
ρ
(x)
(t)
|
d
λ
+
δ
(t)
u
θ
b
(h)
θn
u
0
u
= sup u
Z h
x∈H
t
|x (t) |2 d λ + δ(h) (t)
0
v
u
Z h
2
2
u
b
b
e−θt − e−θnt dt + e−θh − e−θn h
u
u
0
u
2
= sup ux (h)
Z h
x∈H
t
x2 (t) dt + x2 (h)
x∈H
0
=
s
Z
0
h
2
2
b
b
e−θt − e−θn t dt + e−θh − e−θnh ,
(13)
where the last identity is obtained in a similar way to equation (7) in Lemma 1 (see also equations
(26)–(30) in the supplementary material).
5
From Lemma 2 and equation (13), for n sufficiently large, we have
kρθ − ρθbn kL(H)
≤
=
s
Z
h
t |θ − θbn | dt + h |θ − θbn | = |θ − θbn |
2
0
|θ − θbn |h
2
r
2
2
s
Z
h
t2 dt + h2
0
h
+ 1 almost surely.
3
(14)
The strong-consistency of ρθbn in L (H) directly follows from Theorem 1 and equation (14).
Remark 3 From Proposition 2.3(i) in Kleptsyna and Le Breton (2002), p. 5 (see also Theorem 2 below),
the MLE θbT of θ satisfies
E
θ − θbT
2
=O
2θ
T
,
T → ∞.
(15)
In addition, from equation (14), considering T = nh, h > 0,
i h
i
h
h
+1 .
E kρθ − ρθbn k2L(H) ≤ E |θ − θbn |2 h2
3
(16)
Equations (15) and (16) lead to
with G(θ, θbn , h) = O
consistent.
2θ
n
i
h
E kρθ − ρθbn k2L(H) ≤ G(θ, θbn , h),
, n → ∞. Therefore, the functional parameter estimator ρθbn of ρθ is
√
n-
2.3 Consistency of the plug-in ARH(1) predictor
bn , constructed from the MLE ρ b of ρθ in Proposition
Let us consider the plug-in ARH(1) predictor X
θn
1, given by
bn (t) = ρ b (Xn−1 ) (t) = e−θbn t Xn−1 (h) ,
X
θn
0 ≤ t ≤ h, n ∈ Z.
(17)
bn , given in equation (17), from Proposition 1 by
Corollary 1 below provides the consistency of X
applying the following lemma and theorem.
1
Lemma 3 Let {Zn }n∈Z be a sequence of random variables such that Zn ∼ N 0, 2θ
, with θ > 0,
p
and let {Yn }n∈Z be another sequence of random variables such that ln (n)Yn →p 0, n → ∞. Then,
Yn |Zn | →p 0, n → ∞, where, as usual, →p indicates convergence in probability.
The proof of this lemma can be found in the supplementary material.
6
Theorem 2 Let θbT be the MLE of θ defined in equation (10), with θ > 0. Hence,
E
θ − θbT
2
In particular,
lim E
T →∞
=O
2θ
T
θ − θbT
,
2
T → ∞.
(18)
= 0.
(19)
The proof of this result is given in in Proposition 2.3(i) in Kleptsyna and Le Breton (2002), p. 5.
Corollary 1 Let H = L2 [0, h] , β[0,h] , λ + δ(h) be the Hilbert space introduced above. Then, the plug-in
ARH(1) predictor (17) of O.U. process is consistent in H, i.e.,
k ρθ − ρθbn (Xn−1 ) kH →p 0.
(20)
Proof. By definition,
k ρθ − ρθbn (Xn−1 ) kH
= |Xn−1 (h) |
s
Z
h
0
b
e−θt − e−θn t
2
2
b
dt + e−θh − e−θn h .
(21)
From equations (13)–(14) and (21), we then obtain, for n sufficiently large,
r
h
b
+ 1 a.s.
k ρθ − ρθbn (Xn−1 ) kH ≤ |Xn−1 (h) ||θ − θn |h
3
(22)
q
h
b
|θ − θn |h 3 + 1
Let us set {Yn }n∈Z =
and {Zn }n∈Z = {Xn−1 (h)}n∈Z , with
n∈Z
1
Xn−1 ∼ N 0, 2θ
, for every n ∈ Z. From Theorem 1, Yn →a.s. 0, n → ∞. Hence, to apply Lemma 3,
we need to prove that
p
ln (n)Yn →p 0,
n → ∞.
(23)
From Chebyshev’s inequality and Theorem 2, we get, for all ε > 0,
P
p
|θ − θbn | ln (n)h
r
h
+1≥ε
3
!
h2
≤
h
3
i
h
+ 1 ln (n) E |θ − θbn |2
ε2
→n→+∞ 0.
(24)
Therefore, from Lemma 3, we obtain the convergence in probability of k ρθ − ρθbn (Xn−1 ) kH to zero.
2.4 Prediction of O.U. process in B = C ([0, h])
As before, let B be now the Banach space of continuous functions, whose support is the interval [0, h],
with the supremum norm, denoted as C ([0, h]) . The following lemma states that kρkθ kL(B) ≤ 1, for
7
θ > 0, and for every k ≥ 1, with L (B) being the space of bounded linear operators on the Banach space
B = C ([0, h]) , and ρθ being introduced in equation (3). Consequently, considering condition (c1 ) in
Bosq (2000), p. 74,
with
a = 2, b = 1/2 and j = 1, from Lemma 3.1 and Theorem 3.1, in Bosq (2000), pp. 74–75, X = (Xn , n ∈
Z), constructed in (1) from O.U. process, defines the unique stationary solution to equation (2), in the
Banach space B = C ([0, h]) , admitting a MAB(∞) representation.
Lemma 4 Let ρθ introduced in (3), defined on B = C ([0, h]) . Then, for k ≥ 1, kρkθ kL(B) ≤ 1, with
θ > 0.
Proof.
From
ρkθ (x)(t) = e−θt e−θ(k−1)h x(h),
for each k ≥ 1 and θ > 0, we have
kρkθ kL(B)
=
sup
x∈B
=
=
kρkθ (x) kB
kxkB
= sup
x∈B
sup0≤t≤h | exp(−θt) exp(−θ(k − 1)h)x(h)|
sup0≤t≤h |x(t)|
|x(h)| exp(−θ(k − 1)h) sup0≤t≤h exp(−θt)
|x(h)| sup0≤t≤h exp(−θt)
sup
≤ sup
sup0≤t≤h |x(t)|
|x(h)|
x∈B
x∈B
sup exp(−θt) = 1.
(25)
0≤t≤h
We now check strong consistency of the MLE ρθbn of ρθ in L(B). From (25),
b
kρθ − ρθbn kL(B) ≤ sup |e−θt − e−θn t |,
a.s.
(26)
0≤t≤h
From Lemma 2, for n sufficiently large, we then have
kρθ − ρθbn kL(B) ≤ h|θ − θbn |,
a.s.
(27)
Theorem 1 then leads to the desired result on strong consistency of the estimator ρθbn of ρθ in L(B).
√
Furthermore, from Theorem 2 , in a similar way to Remark 3, n-consistency of ρθbn in L (B) also follows
from equations (18) and (27).
Similarly to Corollary 1, in the following result, the consistency, in the Banach space
B = C([0, h]), of the plug-in predictor (17) is obtained.
Corollary 2 The ARB(1) plug-in predictor (17) of a zero-mean O.U. process is consistent in B =
8
C([0, h]), i.e., as n → ∞,
k ρθ − ρθbn (Xn−1 ) kB →p 0.
(28)
Proof. From Lemma 2, for n sufficiently large, and for each h > 0,
k ρθ − ρθbn (Xn−1 ) kB
=
b
sup |e−θt − e−θnt ||Xn−1 (h) | ≤ h|θ − θbn ||Xn−1 (h) |,
a.s.
(29)
0≤t≤h
n
o
As derived in the proof of Corollary 1, from Theorem 2, the random sequence {Yn }n∈Z = h|θ − θbn |
n∈Z
q
p
p
is such that ln (n)Yn ≤ h3 + 1 ln (n)Yn →p 0, n → ∞. Moreover, {Zn }n∈Z = {Xn−1 (h)}n∈Z is such
1
. Lemma 3 then leads, as n → ∞, to the desired convergence result from equathat Xn−1 (h) ∼ N 0, 2θ
tion (29)
k ρθ − ρθbn (Xn−1 ) kB ≤ Yn |Zn | →p 0.
(30)
3
Simulations
In this section, a simulation study is undertaken to illustrate the asymptotic results presented in this
paper about the MLE θbn of θ, and the consistency of the ML functional parameter estimators of the
autocorrelation operator, and the associated plug-in predictors, in the ARH(1) and ARB(1) frameworks.
3.1 Estimation of scale parameter θ
For simulation of the sample-paths of O.U. process, an extension of the Euler method, the EulerMurayama method (see Kloeden and Platen (1992)) is applied, from the Langevin stochastic differential
equation satisfied by the O.U. process {ξt , t ∈ [0, T ]}
dξt = −θξt + dWt ,
θ > 0,
t ∈ [0, T ] ,
ξ0 = x0 .
(31)
Thus, let 0 = t0 < t1 < t2 < · · · < tn = T be a partition of real interval [0, T ] . Then, (31) can be
discretized as
ξbi+1 = ξbi − θξbi + ∆Wi ,
ξb0 = ξ0 = 0,
where {∆Wi }i=0,...,n−1 are i.i.d. Wiener increments, i.e., ∆Wi ∼ N (0, ∆t) =
(32)
√
∆tN (0, 1). In the
following, we take ∆t = 0.02 as discretization step size, considering N = 1000 simulations of the O.U.
process. In particular, Figure 1 shows some realizations of the discrete version of the solution to (31)
generated from (32).
9
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
−0.2
−0.4
−0.6
Figure 1: Three sample paths of O.U. process {ξt }0≤t≤T generated with T = 5, ∆t = 0.02, θ = 5,
ξb0 = 0
−0.8
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
Let us first illustrate the asymptotic normal distribution of θbT , i.e., for T sufficiently large, we can
(see Theorem 1 in the supplementary material).
consider θbT ∼ N θ, 2θ
T
Z T
−
ξt dξt
From equation (10), we take θbT = Z 0T
(see also equation (9) in the supplementary material),
2
ξt dt
0
to compute the following approximation of the MLE θbT of θ, for each one of the N = 1000 simulations
performed of the O.U. process on [0, T ], and for each one of the six values of parameter θ considered:
θbT ≃
−
n−1
X
i=0
ξbti ,s (θ) ξbti+1 ,s (θ) − ξbti ,s (θ)
n−1
X
i=0
, t0 = 0, tn = T, ∆t = 0.02, s = 1, . . . , N,
(33)
ξbt2i ,s (θ)∆t
where ξbti ,s (θ) represents the s-th discrete generation of the O.U. process, evaluated at time ti , with
covariance scale parameter θ, for θ = 0.1, 0.4, 0.7, 1, 2, 5. Table 1 displays the empirical probabilities
q
of the error θbT − θ to be within the band ±3 2θ
T , from N = 1000 discrete simulations of the O.U.
process, considering different sample sizes T = 12000 + 1000(l − 1), l = 1, . . . , 7, and the values θ =
0.1, 0.4, 0.7, 1, 2, 5. Figure 2 displays the cases θ = 0.1 (at the left-hand side) and θ = 5 (at the right-hand
side). It can be observed that, for each one of the sample sizes considered, T = 12000 + 1000(l − 1), l =
q
1, . . . , 7, approximately a 99% of the realizations of θbT − θ lie within the band ±3 2θ
T , which supports
the asymptotic Gaussian distribution.
10
Figure 2: The values of θbT − θ, based on N = 1000 simulations of the O.U. process over the interval
[0, T ], forqT = 12000 + (l − 1)1000, l = 1, . . . , 7, are
q represented against the confidence bands given by
+3σ = 3 2θ
T (upper dotted line) and −3σ = −3
side) and θ = 5 (at the right-hand side)
2θ
T
(lower dotted line), for θ = 0.1 (at the left-hand
T \θ
0.1
0.4
0.7
1
2
5
12000
0.9983
1
0.9983
0.9983
1
0.9983
13000
0.9967
0.9983
0.9983
1
0.9950
1
14000
0.9983
0.9967
1
0.9967
1
0.9983
15000
0.9983
0.9967
0.9983
0.9983
1
0.9983
16000
0.9967
0.9950
0.9967
0.9983
1
1
17000
0.9933
0.9983
1
0.9967
0.9950
1
18000
0.9967
0.9967
0.9950
1
1
0.9983
Table 1: Empirical probabilities of the error of the MLE of θ to lie within the band ±3σ = ±3
different sample sizes T, and values of parameter θ
q
2θ
T ,
for
Regarding asymptotic efficiency, stated in Theorem 2, from N = 1000 simulations of the O.U. process
over the interval [0, T ], for T = 50 + 250(l − 1), l = 1, . . . , 25, the corresponding empirical mean square
N
2
X
1
errors EM SEN,T (θ) = N
θ − θbT (ωs ) , N = 1000, T = 50 + 250(l − 1), l = 1, . . . , 25 (abbreviated
s=1
as EMSE), considering the cases θ = 0.1, 0.4, 0.7, 1, are displayed in Figure 3. Here, θbT (ωs ), ωs ∈ Ω,
s = 1, . . . , N, represent the respective approximated values (33) of the MLE of θ, computed from ξti ,s ,
s = 1, . . . , N, ti ∈ [0, T ], i = 1, . . . , n. It can be observed, from the results displayed in Figure 3, that
Theorem 2 holds for T sufficiently large.
11
−3
x 10
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
5500
6000
Figure 3: Empirical functional mean quadratic errors, based on N = 1000 generations of O.U. process,
for different sample sizes (see horizontal axis), and for the values θ = 0.1 (line with stars), θ = 0.4 (line
with circles), θ = 0.7 (line with crosses), θ = 1 (line with inclined crosses) and θ = 2 (line with triangles)
3.2 Consistency of ρθbT = ρθbn in L(H) and L(B)
The strong-consistency of ρθbn in L(H) is derived in Proposition 1 from the following almost surely upper
bound
kρθ −
ρθbn k2L(H)
≤
|θ − θbn |h
r
h
+ 1.
3
(34)
Here, from N = 1000 simulations of the O.U. process on the interval [0, T ], with T = nh = n =
200000 + (l − 1)200000 (h = 1), for l = 1, . . . , 5, the corresponding values of θbT − θ = θbn − θ are
computed, considering the cases θ = 0.4, 0.7, 1. Table 2 shows the empirical probability of θbT − θ to lie
q
within the band ±3 2θ
T , for each one of sample sizes T = 200000 + (l − 1)200000, l = 1, . . . , 5, and cases
θ = 0.4, 0.7, 1, considered. It can be observed that for the sample sizes studied, in the case of θ = 1,
the empirical probabilities are equal to one. Thus, the almost surely convergence to zero of the upper
√
√
bound (34) holds, with approximated convergence rate T = n. Note that, for the other two cases,
θ = 0.4 and θ = 0.7, the empirical probabilities are also very close to one (see also Table 1 for smaller
sample sizes, where we can also observe the empirical probabilities very close to one for the same band).
In particular, Figure 4 displays the cases θ = 0.4 (at the left-hand side) and θ = 1 (at the right-hand
side).
12
T \θ
0.4
0.7
1
200000
1
1
1
400000
1
1
1
600000
0.9988
1
1
800000
0.9988
0.9988
1
1000000
0.9977
1
1
q
Table 2: Empirical probability of θbT − θ to be within the band ±3σ = ±3 2θ
T , from N = 1000
simulations of O.U. process over the interval [0, T ], with T = n = 200000 + (l − 1)200000, l = 1, . . . , 5,
considering the cases θ = 0.4, 0.7, 1
Figure 4: The values of θbT − θ are represented, corresponding to N = 1000 simulations of O.U. process
over the interval [0, T ], with T = n = 200000 + (l − 1)200000, l = 1, . . . , 5, considering
q the cases θ = 0.4
(at the left-hand side), and θ = 1 (at right-hand side). The upper dotted line is +3
q
dotted line is −3 2θ
T
2θ
T
and the lower
It can be observed from Table 2 that a better performance is obtained for the largest values of θ,
which corresponds to the weakest dependent case. Furthermore, from the upper bound (27), the strong
consistency of ρθbn in L(B), with, as before, B = C([0, h]), is also illustrated from the results displayed
in Table 2 and Figure 4.
3.3 Consistency of the ARH(1) and ARB(1) plug-in predictors for the O.U. process
Let us now consider the derived upper bounds (22) and (29) in Corollaries 1 and 2, for the ARH(1)
and ARB(1) predictors, respectively. From the generation of N = 1000 discrete realizations of the O.U.
process over the interval [0, T ], for T = n = 200000 + (l − 1)200000, l = 1, . . . , 5, the upper bounds (22)
and (29) are evaluated, for the cases θ = 0.4, 0.7, 1. The following empirical probabilities for ε2 = 0.008,
"
#
r
h
H
b
b
b
Pθ,N (T ) = 1 − P |Xn−1 (h) ||θ − θn |h
+1>ε
3
N = 1000, T = n = 200000 + (l − 1)200000, l = 1, . . . , 5, θ = 0.4, 0.7, 1,
h
i
B
Pbθ,N
(T ) = 1 − Pb |Xn−1 (h) ||θ − θbn |h > ε
N = 1000, T = n = 200000 + (l − 1)200000, l = 1, . . . , 5, θ = 0.4, 0.7, 1,
13
(35)
(36)
q
Figure 5: The values of |Xn−1 (h) ||θ − θbn |h h3 + 1 (top) and |Xn−1 (h) ||θ − θbn |h (bottom) are
represented, based on N = 1000 generations of O.U. process over the interval [0, T ], for T = n =
200000 + (l − 1)200000, l = 1, . . . , 5, against ε = 0.008 (horizontal dotted line), considering θ = 0.4 (at
the left-hand side) and θ = 1 (at the right-hand side)
are reflected in Table 3, for the Hilbert-valued (see (22)) and Banach-valued (see (29)) frameworks (see
also Figure 5). It can be observed that the empirical probabilities are equal to one in both frameworks
for the largest sample sizes, in any of the cases considered.
Hilbert-valued case
Banach-valued case
T \θ
0.4
0.7
1
0.4
0.7
1
200000
0.9800
0.9800
0.9800
0.9871
0.9906
0.9871
400000
0.9953
0.9953
0.9953
0.9965
0.9977
0.9977
600000
0.9988
0.9977
0.9988
0.9988
0.9988
1
800000
1
0.9988
0.9988
1
1
1
1000000
1
1
1
1
1
1
Table 3: Empirical probabilities (35) and (36), based on N = 1000 simulations of the O.U. process over
the interval [0, T ], for T = n = 200000 + (l − 1)200000, l = 1, . . . , 5, considering the cases θ = 0.4, 0.7, 1,
and ε2 = 0.008
The strong-consistency of the MLE of θ and of the autocorrelation operator of the O.U. process, in
Banach and Hilbert spaces, has been first illustrated. The almost surely rate of convergence to zero is
shown as well. The numerical results on the consistency of the associated ARH(1) and ARB(1) plug-in
predictors then follow, from the computation of the corresponding empirical probabilities for the derived
upper bounds. Note that the numerical results displayed in Section 3 are obtained under generation of
sample sizes ranging from 12000 up to a million of time instants, considering 1000 repetitions for each
one of such sample sizes. In all these simulations performed, the discretization step size considered has
14
been ∆t = 0.02.
4
Final comments
The problem of functional prediction of the O.U. process could be of interest in several applied fields.
For example, in finance, in the context of Vasicek model (see Vasicek (1977)) the results derived allow to
predict the curve representing the interest rate over a temporal interval, in a consistent way. Note that,
in this context, the ML estimate computed for parameter θ provides a consistent approximation of the
speed reversion, which univocally determines the proposed functional predictor of the interest rate.
Summarizing, this paper addresses the problem of functional prediction of the O.U. process from
ARH(1) and ARB(1) perspectives. Specifically, considering the O.U. process as an ARH(1) and an
ARB(1) process, new results on strong consistency (almost surely convergence to the true parameter
value), in the spaces L(H) and L(B) of the MLE of its autocorrelation operator are derived. Consistency
results (convergence in probability to the true value) of the associated plug-in predictors are obtained as
well. The numerical results shown, in addition, the normality and the asymptotic efficiency of the MLE
of the scale parameter θ of the covariance function of the O.U. process.
Acknowledgements
This work has been supported in part by projects MTM2012-32674 (co-funded by European Regional
Development Funds), and MTM2015–71839–P of the DGI, MINECO.
References
[1] Antoniadis, A., Paparoditis, E. and Sapatinas, T. (2006). A functional wavelet-kernel approach for time
series prediction, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 68 837–857.
[2] Antoniadis, A. and Sapatinas, T. (2003). Wavelet methods for continuous-time prediction using Hilbertvalued autoregressive processes, J. Multivariate Anal. 87 133–158.
[3] Bensmain, N. and Mourid, T. (2001). Estimateur ”sieve” de l’opérateur d’un processus ARH(1). C. R.
Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math. 332 1015–1018.
[4] Bosq, D. (1991). Modelization, nonparametric estimation and prediction for continuous time processes. Nonparametric functional estimation and related topics (Spetses, 1990) 335 NATO Adv. Sci. Inst. Ser. C Math.
Phys. Sci. Kluwer Acad. Publ. Dordrecht 509–529.
[5] Bosq, D. (1996). Limit theorems for Banach-valued autoregressive processes. Applications to real continuous
time processes. Bull. Belg. Math. Soc. Simon Stevin 3 537–555.
15
[6] Bosq, D . (2000). Linear Processes in Function Spaces. Springer-Verlag, New York.
[7] Bosq, D. (2002). Estimation of mean and covariance operator of autoregressive processes in Banach spaces.
Stat. Inference Stoch. Process. 5 287–306.
[8] Bosq, D. (2004). Standard Hilbert moving averages. Ann. I.S.U.P. 48 17–28.
[9] Bosq, D. (2007). General linear processes in Hilbert spaces and prediction, J. Stat. Plann. Inference 137
879–894.
[10] Bosq, D. and Blanke, D. (2007). Inference and Predictions in Large Dimensions. John Wiley, Chichester.
[11] Damon, J. and Guillas, S. (2002). The inclusion of exogenous variables in functional autoregressive ozone
forecasting. Environmetrics 13 759–774.
[12] Dedecker, J. and Merlevede, F. The conditional central limit theorem in Hilbert spaces. Stochastic
processes and their applications 108, 2003, pp. 229–262.
[13] Dehling, H. and Sharipov, O. S. (2005). Estimation of mean and covariance operator for Banach space
valued autoregressive processes with dependent innovations. Stat. Inference Stoch. Process. 8 137–149.
[14] Doob, J. L. (1942). The Brownian movement and stochastic equations. Annals of Mathematics 43 319–337.
[15] Ferraty, F. and Vieu, P. (2006). Nonparametric Functional Data Analysis. Springer Series in Statistics,
Springer, New York.
[16] Glendinning, R. and Fleet, S. (2007). Classifying functional time series. Signal Process. 87 79–100.
[17] Guillas, S. (2000). Noncausality and functional discretization, limit theorems for an ARHX(1) process. C.
R. Acad. Sci. Paris 331 Série I 91–94.
[18] Guillas, S. (2001). Rates of convergence of autocorrelation estimates for autoregressive Hilbertian processes.
Statist. Probab. Lett. 55 281–291.
[19] Hormann, S. and Kokoszka, P. (2011). Consistency of the mean and the principal components of spatially
distributed functional data. Recent advances in functional data analysis and related topics. Contrib. Statist.
Physica-Verlag/Springer, Heidelberg, pp. 169–175.
[20] Kargin, V. and Onatski, A. (2008). Curve forecasting by functional autoregression. J. Multivariate Anal.
99 2508–2526.
[21] Kleptsyna, M.L. and Le Breton, A. (2002). Statistical analysis of the fractional Ornstein-Uhlenbeck
type process. Statistical Inference for Stochastic Processes 5 229–248.
[22] Kloeden, P. E. and Platen, E. (1992). Numerical Solution of Stochastic Differential Equations. Springer,
Berlin
16
[23] Kutoyants, Y. (2004). Statistical Inference for Ergodic Diffusion Processes. Springer Series in Statistics,
London.
[24] Labbas, A. and Mourid, T. (2003). Estimation et prévision d’un processus autorégressif Banach. Ann.
I.S.U.P. 47 19–38.
[25] Laukaitis, A. (2008). Functional data analysis for cash flow and transactions intensity continuous-time
prediction using Hilbert-valued autoregressive processes. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 185 1607–1614.
[26] Laukaitis, A., Vasilecas, O. and Laukaitis R. (2009). Estimation of the autoregressive operator by
wavelet packets. Statist. Probab. Lett. 79 38–43.
[27] Liptser, R. S. and Shiraev, A. N. (2001). Statistics of Random Processes I, II. Springer, New York.
[28] Marion, J.-M. and Pumo, B. (2004). Comparison of ARH(1) and ARHD(1) models on physiological data.
Ann. I.S.U.P. 48 29–38.
[29] Mas, A. (2002). Weak convergence for the covariance operators of a Hilbertian linear process. Stochastic
Process. Appl. 99 117–135.
[30] Mas, A. (2004). Consistance du prédicteur dans le modle ARH(1) : le cas compact. Ann. I.S.U.P. 48 39–48.
[31] Mas, A. (2007). Weak convergence in the functional autoregressive model. J. Multivariate Anal. 98 1231–
1261.
[32] Mas, A. and Menneteau, L. (2003). Large and moderate deviations for infinitedimensional autoregressive
processes. J. Multivariate Anal. 87 241–260.
[33] Mas, A. and Pumo, B. (2007). The ARHD model. J. Stat. Plann. Inference 137 538–553.
[34] Menneteau, L. (2005). Some laws of the iterated logarithm in Hilbertian autoregressive models. J. Multivariate Anal. 92 405–425.
[35] Mokhtari, F. and Mourid, T. (2002). Prédiction des processus á temps continu autorégressifs via les
espaces á noyau reproduisant. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 334 65–70.
[36] Mourid, T. (2002). Estimation and prediction of functional autoregressive processes. Statistics 36 125–138.
[37] Mourid, T. (2004). Processus autorégressifs hilbertiens á coefficients aléatoires. Ann. I.S.U.P. 48 79–85.
[38] Pumo, B. (1998). Prediction of continuous time processes by C[0,1] -valued autoregressive process. Stat.
Inference Stoch. Process. 1 297–309.
[39] Rachedi, F. (2004). Vitesse de convergence de l’estimateur crible d’un ARB(1). Ann. I.S.U.P. 48 87–96.
[40] Rachedi, F. (2005) Vitesse de convergence en norme p-intégrale et normalité asymptotique de l’estimateur
crible de l’opérateur d’un ARB(1). C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 341 369–374.
17
[41] Rachedi, F. and Mourid, T. (2003). Estimateur crible de l’opérateur d’un processus ARB(1). C. R. Math.
Acad. Sci. Paris 336 605–610.
[42] Ramsay J.O. and Silverman, B.W. (2005). Functional Data Analysis. Springer Series in Statistics.
Springer, New York.
[43] Ruiz-Medina, M. D. (2012). Spatial functional prediction from spatial autorregresive Hilbertian processes.
Environmetrics 23 119–128.
[44] Ruiz-Medina, M. D. and Salmerón, R. (2009). Functional maximum-likelihood estimation of ARH(p)
models. Stochastic Environ- mental Research and Risk Assessment 24 131–146.
[45] Turbillon, C., Bosq, D., Marion, J. -M. and Pumo, B. (2008). Moving averages in Hilbert spaces, C.
R., Math., Acad. Sci. Paris 346 347– 350.
[46] Turbillon, C., Marion, J. -M. and Pumo, B. (2007). Estimation of the moving-average operator in a
Hilbert space. In Recent advances in stochastic modeling and data analysis. World Sci. Publ., Hackensack, NJ,
pp. 597–604.
[47] Uhlenbeck, G. E. and Ornstein, L. S. (1930). On the theory of Brownian motion. Physical Review 36
823–841.
[48] Vasicek, O. (1977). An equilibrium characterization of the term structure. J.Financial Economics 5 177–
188.
[49] Wang, M. C. and G. E. Uhlenbeck (1945). On the theory of Brownian motion II. Reviews of Modern
Physics 17 323–342.
18
Supplementary Material: Consistency of the plug-in functional
predictor of the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process in Hilbert and
Banach spaces
arXiv:1706.06354v1 [math.ST] 20 Jun 2017
Javier Álvarez-Liébana1 , Denis Bosq2 and M. Dolores Ruiz-Medina1
21st June 2017
1
Department of Statistics and O. R., University of Granada, Spain.
LSTA, Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris 6, Paris, France.
E-mail: [email protected]
2
Summary
The definition and properties of O.U. process are given here, as well as the proof of Lemma 1.
Key words: Autoregressive Hilbertian processes; Banach-valued autoregressive processes; consistency;
maximum likelihood parameter estimator; Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process.
1
Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process
Let ξ (ω) = {ξt (ω)}t∈R , ω ∈ Ω, be a real-valued sample-path continuous stochastic process defined on
the basic probability space (Ω, Σ, P) , with index set the real line R. As demonstrated in Doob (1942),
process ξ is an O.U. process if it provides the Gaussian solution to the following stochastic linear Langevin
differential equation:
dξt = θ (µ − ξt ) dt + σdWt ,
θ, σ > 0,
t ∈ R,
(1)
(1)
(2)
where W = {Wt }t∈R is a standard bilateral Wiener process, i.e., Wt = Wt χR+ (t) + W−t χR− (t), with
(1)
Wt
(2)
and W−t being independent standard Wiener processes, and χR+ and χR− respectively denoting
the indicator functions over the positive and negative real line. Applying, in equation (1), the method
of separation of variables, considering f (ξt , t) = ξt eθt , we obtain
ξt
= µ+
Z
t
σe−θ(t−s) dWs ,
−∞
θ, σ > 0, t ∈ R,
(2)
where the integral is understood in the Itb
o sense (see Ash and Gardner (1976) and Sobczyk (1991) for
more details). Particularizing to ξ = {ξt }t∈R+ , the O.U. process is transformed into
ξt = ξ0 e−θt + µ 1 − e−θt +
Z
t
σe−θ(t−s) dWs ,
0
1
θ, σ > 0, t ∈ R+ .
(3)
It is well-known that the solution ξ = {ξt }t∈R to the stochastic differential equation
dξt = µ (ξt , t) dt +
p
D (ξt , t)dWt ,
t ∈ R,
(4)
has marginal probability density function f (x, t) , satisfying the following Fokker-Planck scalar equation
(see, for example, Kadanoff (2000)):
∂
−∂
1 ∂2
[D (x, t) f (x, t)] ,
f (x, t) =
[µ (x, t) f (x, t)] +
∂t
∂x
2 ∂x2
t ∈ R.
(5)
∂
f (x, t) = 0), under f (x, x0 ) = δ (x − x0 ),
In the case of O.U. process, the stationary solution ( ∂t
adopts the form
f (x, t) =
r
2
θ −θ(x−µ)
σ2
,
e
πσ 2
θ, σ > 0, t ∈ R,
(6)
which corresponds to the probability density function of a Gaussian distribution with mean µ and variance
σ2
2θ ,
i.e., which corresponds to the probability density function of a random variable X such that
2
X ∼ N µ, σ2θ . From (2), the mean and covariance functions of O.U. process (see, for instance,
Uhlenbeck and Ornstein (1930) and Doob (1942)) can be computed as follows:
µξ (t)
= E [ξt ] = µ + σE
Z
t
−∞
Cξ (t, s)
e−θ(t−s) dWs = µ,
t ∈ R,
2 −θ(t+s)
= Cov [ξs , ξt ] = E [(ξs − µ) (ξt − µ)] = σ e
= σ 2 e−θ(t+s)
Z
∞
t
θu
e dWu
−∞
e2θu χ[−∞,t] (u) χ[−∞,s] (u) du = σ 2 e−θ(t+s)
−∞
=
E
Z
σ 2 −θ|t−s|
σ 2 −θ(t+s) 2θ min{s,t}
e
e
=
e
,
2θ
2θ
Z
Z
s
−∞
min{s,t}
θv
e dWv
e2θu du
−∞
t, s ∈ R,
(7)
where Cov [X, Y ] denotes the covariance between random variables X and Y . Additionally, from (3), we
obtain the following identities:
E [ξt ] =
Cov [ξs , ξt |ξ0 = c] =
µe−θt + µ 1 − e−θt = µ,
E [ξt |ξ0 = c] = µ + e−θt (c − µ) ,
σ 2 −θ|t−s|
e
+ c2 − 2cµ + µ2 e−θ(s+t) , t, s ∈ R+ ,
2θ
where c is a constant. In the subsequent development, we will consider µ = 0 and σ = 1.
2
t ∈ R+ ,
(8)
2
Maximum likelihood estimation of the covariance scale parameter θ
The MLE of θ in (7) is given by (see Graczyk and Jakubowski (2006), Kutoyants (2004), p. 63, and
Liptser and Shiraev (2001), p. 265)
Z T
Z T
Z T
RT
−
ξt dξt
θ
ξt2 dt −
ξt dWt
ξt dWt
0
0
0
b
θT = Z T
=
= θ − Z0 T
,
Z T
2
2
2
ξt dt
ξt dt
ξt dt
0
0
θ, T > 0.
(9)
0
Thus, equation (9) becomes
ξ2
θbT
=
ξ2
1 + T0 − TT
,
R
2 T 2
T 0 ξt dt
T > 0.
(10)
We will assume that T is large enough such that θbT > 0 almost surely. It is well-known that the MLE
θbT of θ is strongly consistent (see details in Kleptsyna and Le Breton (2002), Proposition 2.2, p. 4, and
Kutoyants (2004), p. 63 and p. 117).
Theorem 1 The following limit in distribution sense holds for the MLE θbT of θ, given in equation (10):
√ RT
√
− T 0 ξt dWt
b
lim T θT − θ = lim
= Z,
Z T
T →∞
T →∞
ξt2 dt
with
Z ∼ N (0, 2θ) .
(11)
0
Theorem 1.1 and Corollary 1.1 in Jiang (2012), p. 2, lead to the following almost surely identities
(see also Bosq (2000), Theorem 2.10, p. 54, and Ledoux and Talagrand (1991), pp. 196–203, in relation
to the law of the iterated logarithm)
lim sup q
T →+∞
4θ
T
− lim inf q
θbT − θ
= 1 a.s.,
θbT − θ
= 1 a.s.,
log (log (T ))
!
r
4θ log (log (T ))
b
|θ − θT | = O
a.s.
T
T →+∞
3
(12)
log (log (T ))
4θ
T
(13)
(14)
Preliminary inequalities and results
In this section we recall some inequalities and well-known convergence results on random variables, as
well as basic deterministic inequalities, that have been applied in the derivation of the main results of
3
paper Consistency of the plug-in functional predictor of the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process in Hilbert and
Banach spaces
Lemma 1 Let X be a zero-mean normal distributed random variable, i.e., X ∼ N 0, σ 2 , with σ > 0.
Then,
x2
P (|X| ≥ x) ≤ e− 2σ2 , ∀x ≥ 0.
(15)
Proof. Let X ′ be such that X ′ ∼ N (0, 1) . Then,
′
P (|X | ≥ x) = 2FX ′ (−x) =
r
2
π
Z
∞
x
t2
e− 2 dt, ∀x ≥ 0.
(16)
Let us set
2
− x2
−
g (x)
= e
g ′ (x)
= −xe−
x2
2
r
Z
2 ∞ − t2
e 2 dt, g (0) = 0, lim g (x) = 0,
x→∞
π x
!
r
r
x2
2 − x2
2
+
e 2 = e− 2
−x .
π
π
(17)
q
q
2
Function g is monotone increasing over 0, π2 , and g is monotone decreasing over
π,∞ .
From equations (16) and (17),
P (|X ′ | ≥ x) ≤ e−
Now, consider X ′ =
X
σ,
x2
2
, ∀x ≥ 0.
with X ∼ N 0, σ 2 , then,
x2
P (|X| ≥ x) ≤ e− 2σ2 , ∀x ≥ 0.
(18)
1
, with θ > 0,
Lemma 2 Let {Zn }n∈Z be a sequence of random variables such that Zn ∼ N 0, 2θ
p
and let {Yn }n∈Z be another sequence of random variables such that ln (n)Yn →p 0, n → ∞. Then,
Yn |Zn | →p 0, n → ∞, where, as usual, →p indicates convergence in probability.
Proof. Considering the indicator function χ(·) , it holds
Yn |Zn | =
Yn |Zn |χ{|Zn |<an } + Yn |Zn |χ{|Zn |≥an } ≤ Yn an + Yn |Zn |χ{|Zn |≥an } ,
(19)
where {an }n∈Z is a sequence of positive numbers such that the event Yn |Zn |χ{|Zn |≥an } is equivalent
4
to {|Zn | ≥ an }. From (19) and Lemma 1, if we take an > 2ε , for all n ∈ Z, we get
2
ε
ε
+ P (|Zn | ≥ an ) ≤ P Yn an ≥
+ e−θan , ∀ε > 0.
P Yn an ≥
2
2
P (Yn |Zn | ≥ ε) ≤
For an = c
p
ln (n) > 2ε , with
X
n∈Z
√1
θ
< c < +∞,
P (|Zn | ≥ an ) ≤
X
2
e−θan =
n∈Z
X 1
< +∞,
nθc2
(21)
n∈Z
which implies that limn→∞ P (|Zn | ≥ an ) = 0 in equation (20). On the other hand, since
0, for every ε > 0,
0 = lim P
n→∞
(20)
p
ln (n)Yn →p
a
p
ε
ε
n
ln (n)Yn ≥
= lim P Yn
.
≥
n→∞
2
c
2
(22)
Thus, Yn |Zn | →p 0.
Lemma 3 If t ∈ [0, +∞), it holds that |e−xt − e−yt | ≤ |x − y|t, for any x, y ≥ 0.
Proof. Let us first assume that x ≥ y > 0. From Mean Value Theorem applied over ez , there exists
0 < α < 1 such that
ez+h −ez
h
|e−xt − e−yt | =
= ez+αh . Taking z = −xt and z +h = −yt, we get the following inequalities:
|x − y|te−xt+α(x−y)t = |x − y|text(α−1) e−yαt ≤ |x − y|te−yαt ≤ |x − y|t.
(23)
Similar inequalities are obtained for the case y ≥ x > 0, by applying Mean Value Theorem over
interval [x, y] instead of [y, x].
4
Proof of Lemma 1
The proof of Lemma 1, appearing in Section 1.1 of the paper Consistency of the plug-in functional
predictor of the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process in Hilbert and Banach spaces, is now provided.
Proof. Let us first consider the case k = 1, from
ρθ (x) (t) = e−θt x (h) ,
ρθ (Xn−1 ) (t) = e−θt
Z
nh
e−θ(nh−s) dWs ,
−∞
εn (t) =
Z
nh+t
e−θ(nh+t−s) dWs ,
nh
(24)
and
kρθ (x)k2H
=
Z
0
h
|ρθ (x) (t) |2 d λ + δ(h) (t) =
5
Z
0
h
|ρθ (x) (t) |2 dt + |ρθ (x) (h) |2 ,
(25)
we have
kρθ kL(H)
=
v
!
u Z h
u
u
−2θt
−2θh
2 (h)
x
e
dt
+
e
u 0
kρθ (x) kH
u
.
= sup u
sup
Z
h
t
kxkH
x∈H
x∈H
2
2
x
(t)
dt
+
x
(h)
(26)
0
Furthermore, trivially,
kρθ kL(H)
v
!
u Z h
u
−2θt
−2θh
u
x2 (h) sZ
dt + e
u 0 e
h
u
e−2θt dt + e−2θh .
= sup u
≤
Z
h
x∈H t
0
2
2
x (t) dt + x (h)
(27)
0
Additionally, the function x0 : [0, h] −→ R, given by
h ∈ M ⊂ [0, h],
x0 (t) = χM (t),
Z
dt = 0,
(28)
M
with χM , denoting the indicator function of set M, belongs to H = L2 [0, h] , β[0,h] , λ + δ(h) , since
Rh
Rh
x20 (h) = 1, 0 x20 (t)dt = 0, and kx0 k2H = 0 x20 (s)ds + x20 (h) = 1. Thus, by definition of kρθ kL(H) ,
kρθ (x0 )kH
=
kx0 kH
s
Z
h
e−2θt dt + e−2θh
0
≤ kρθ kL(H)
(29)
Equations (26), (27) and (29) lead to
kρθ kL(H) =
s
Z
h
e−2θt dt
+
e−2θh
0
=
r
1 + e−2θh (2θ − 1)
.
2θ
(30)
We are now going to compute kρkθ kL(H) , for k ≥ 2. Since, for all x ∈ H,
ρkθ (x)(t) = e−θt e−θ(k−1)h x(h),
we obtain
kρkθ kL(H)
vh
i
u
u e−2θ(k−1)h R h e−2θt dt + e−2θkh x2 (h)
u
0
= sup t
.
Rh
x∈H
x2 (t)dt + x2 (h)
0
(31)
(32)
Considering function x0 defined in equation (28), applying similar arguments to those given in the
computation of kρθ kL(H) , we have
kρkθ kL(H) =
r
e−2θ(k−1)h
1 + e−2θh (2θ − 1)
= e−θ(k−1)h kρθ kL(H) .
2θ
6
(33)
Now, from equation (30),
1
kρθ kL(H) < 1 ⇔ 1 − e−2θh < 2θ 1 − e−2θh ⇔ θ > .
2
(34)
Furthermore, for θ ∈ (0, 1/2],
kρθ kL(H) =
since
p
√
α (θ) < 1 + h,
(35)
p
α (θ) is a monotonically decreasing function on (0, 1/2] , with α (θ) = 1 if θ =
1
2
and α (θ) → 1+h,
h > 0,
(36)
when θ → 0. Hence, if θ(k − 1) ≥ 1,
kρkθ kL(H)
=e
−θ(k−1)h
p
p
α (θ) ≤ e−h α (θ) <
which implies that kρkθ 0 kL(H) < 1, when k0 ≥
1
θ
√
1+h
< 1,
eh
+ 1.
References
[1] Ash, R. B. and Gardner, M. F. (1976). Topics in stochastic processes, Bulletin of the American
Mathematical Society 82 817–820.
[2] Bosq, D. (2000). Linear Processes in Function Spaces. Springer-Verlag, New York.
[3] Doob, J. L. (1942). The Brownian movement and stochastic equations. Annals of Mathematics 43
319–337.
[4] Graczyk, P. and Jakubowski, T. (2006). Analysis of Ornstein-Uhlenbeck and Laguerre stochatic
processes. Ecole CIMPA Familles orthogonales et semigroupes en analyse et probabilités
http://math.univ-angers.fr/publications/prepub/fichiers/00229.pdf
[5] Jiang, H. (2012). Berry-Essen bounds and the law of the iterated logarithm for estimators fo parameters in an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process with linear drift, Journal of Applied Probability 49 978–989.
[6] Kadanoff, L.P. (2000). Statistical Physics: Statics, Dynamics and Renormalization. World Scientific, Singapur.
[7] Kleptsyna, M.L. and Le Breton, A. (2002). Statistical analysis of the fractional OrnsteinUhlenbeck type process. Statistical Inference for Stochastic Processes 5 229–248.
[8] Kutoyants, Y. (2004). Statistical Inference for Ergodic Diffusion Processes. Springer Series in
Statistics, London.
7
[9] Ledoux, M. and Talagrand, M. (1991). Probability in Banach spaces. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
[10] Liptser, R. S. and Shiraev, A. N. (2001). Statistics of Random Processes I, II. Springer, New
York.
[11] Sobczyk, K. (1991). Stochastic Differential Equations, with Applications to Physics and Engineering. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
[12] Uhlenbeck, G. E. and Ornstein, L. S. (1930). On the theory of Brownian motion. Physical
Review 36 823–841.
8
| 10math.ST
|
Computer Simulation of 3-D Finite-Volume
Liquid Transport in Fibrous Materials: a
Physical Model for Ink Seepage into Paper
arXiv:1307.2789v1 [cs.CE] 10 Jul 2013
Reza Farrahi Moghaddam and Fereydoun Farrahi Moghaddam and Mohamed Cheriet
Synchromedia Laboratory for Multimedia Communication in Telepresence,
École de technologie supérieure, Montreal, (QC), Canada H3C 1K3
Tel.: +1-514-396-8972
Fax: +1-514-396-8595
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
Abstract
A physical model for the simulation ink/paper interaction at the mesoscopic scale
is developed. It is based on the modified Ising model, and is generalized to consider
the restriction of the finite-volume of ink and also its dynamic seepage. This allows
the model to obtain the ink distribution within the paper volume. At the mesoscopic
scale, the paper is modeled using a discretized fiber structure. The ink distribution
is obtained by solving its equivalent optimization problem, which is solved using a
modified genetic algorithm, along with a new boundary condition and the quasilinear technique. The model is able to simulate the finite-volume distribution of
ink.
Key words: Bleed-through phenomenon, Mesoscopic scale analysis, Porous
medium, Fluid flow.
1
Introduction
Historical documents and manuscripts are snapshots of the cultural past and
the history of civilizations [2, 5]. They cannot be replaced by their modern
counterparts, because marks or strokes on them that seem meaningless may
reveal an important relationship to thought that would be unreachable in a
transliteration. The task of preserving these cultural pearls is of great importance, therefore, as they are valuable resources that have survived threats to
their existence many times over throughout the ages. However, they have become degraded by environmental factors, such as humidity and temperature,
Preprint
10 July 2013
and by the aging process. Usually, the degree of the physical degradation is
so great that other sources of degradation, such as that potentially caused
by the imaging systems themselves, can be virtually ignored, especially since
the camera-based imaging systems in use today in cultural archiving centers
are of such high quality. Therefore, the main problem with old documents is
physical degradation.
At the same time, understanding historical manuscripts and extracting text
and textual relationships from them is a challenging task [34, 36, 17]. Because
of the degradation phenomenon, the ink may be faded or some parts of the
text may be missed. Also, the background intensities could be very complex,
and interfere with the analysis process. If a good understanding of the physical
phenomena that control the interaction of paper and ink is not available, the
tasks of preservation and understanding cannot be accomplished.
A common phenomenon encountered in old documents is bleed-through [38,
13, 42, 22, 15, 14, 9, 37, 20, 18, 21, 19], which results in the appearance of
interfering patterns and signatures on one side of the document originating
from the ink strokes on the other side of it. The main problem with bleedthrough signatures is that they resemble text-like patterns because their origin
is the text patterns on the other side of the paper. Not only does this reduce
our ability to understand and process the document images, it also makes
it difficult to enhance and restore these images. Therefore, features such as
orientation, color, and regional and local features should be used to identify
these patterns, which may also vary from one document image to another.
It soon becomes clear that modeling this phenomenon, and, more accurately,
modeling the ink-paper interaction, plays a central role in the processing of
degraded document images.
Understanding the ink seepage phenomenon is a challenging task, but it is
an important requirement in document-related processing. This phenomenon
can be considered as a fluid flow problem through a porous medium. The
interaction of fluid with porous media is not limited to paper and ink, of
course. From water transport in the soil to the oil industry [35, 39, 11, 41, 6],
this interaction governs many critical and important physical problems. The
application that is the most similar to the ink-paper problem is fabric printing.
There is a big difference between these two applications, however. In fabric
printing, the amount of ink involved is almost unlimited, and instead, gravity,
time, and other parameters control the extent of ink seepage into the fabric
structure. In contrast, in the ink-paper case, the amount of ink is the main
constraint that determines the extent of ink propagation into the paper. Due
to the limited amount of ink/water and other restrictions in the ink-paper
problem, many of the approaches and methods that are based on stationary
flow of the fluid, or reservoir-based transition flow, are not applicable.
2
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Fig. 1. a) and b) X-ray images of paper structures (courtesy of [4]). c) X-ray images
of a piece of wood (courtesy of [4]). d) A fiber structure, which resembles a real
structure, generated as a domain for numerical simulation (courtesy of [40]).
There are two main approaches to addressing the seepage phenomenon: physical experiments and numerical simulations. Although physical experiments
seem to be more accurate, they are quite expensive, and the extraction of parameters of interest from the bulk of the physical material is difficult, in some
cases introducing a large error. In contrast, thanks to remarkable developments in computational fluid dynamics, and also in computational hardware,
numerical simulations now very nearly approach physical experiments in terms
of accuracy. At the same time, the extraction of information from the output
of numerical calculations is easy and straightforward.
The porous nature of paper is the main cause of ink seepage, as paper is
usually made up of a collection of cellulose fibers. Figures 1(a) and 1(b) show
two close-up X-ray images of paper fiber structures. The image on left is an
example of newsprint paper. For the sake of comparison, the fiber structure
of wood is also provided, in Figure 1(c). As can be seen from the figure, a
number of imperfections are introduced into the fiber structure in the process
of paper-making. Many works have used numerically generated fiber structures
to simulate the fluid and solid interaction [40]. A sample structure is shown
3
in Figure 1(d).
The seepage phenomenon can be analyzed at different scales: macroscopic,
mesoscopic, microscopic, and nanoscopic. The macroscopic scale is the most
practical of these; however, it requires that the physics of the problem be
known, in terms of some nonlinear diffusion coefficient. The microscopic scale
can be used to analyze a single fiber, but the computational complexity of
processing a fiber structure would be tremendously high. The nanoscopic scale
enables a detailed study of the interactions within a single fiber. But, it is at the
mesoscopic scale [16] that individual fibers and fiber structure can be observed
at the same time. Analysis at this scale could be undertaken independently
of the other scales, because, in addition to the possibility of observing the
majority of the interactions, it offers the option of developing a model using
many different approaches. An example of fluid saturation in a fiber structure,
obtained in [4], is presented in Figure 2. A brief description of some of these
approaches is provided in section A.
In this work, a realistic model at the mesoscopic scale is developed. The new
model is able to solve finite-volume fluid problems, which are critically important in the study of ink-paper interaction. To the best of our knowledge,
no such model exists in the literature. The proposed model considers the individual fibers in the paper structure and follows the ink movement either
within or between these fibers. In order to build this model, a new energy
functional and a new boundary condition are introduced to model the finitevolume constraint. Also, a modified numerical optimization technique, based
on the genetic algorithm (GA), is introduced to reduce computational cost. In
this technique a quasi-linear approach is used to convert the nonlinear nature
of the problem into a quasi-linear one which reduces that cost drastically.
Fig. 2. Saturation profiles of the liquid in a fiber assembly (from [4]).
The organization of the paper is as follows. In section A, a review of the
various models used to study the propagation of fluid in the porous medium
is presented. The problem statement is given in section 4. The process of
4
building the fiber structure at the mesoscopic scale is discussed in section 5.
The formulation of the model, and especially the development of finite-volume
behavior, is presented in section 6. Then, in section 7, two methods to solve
the proposed model are provided, based on a global optimizer and a modified
GA respectively. (We study various situations in this section.) Finally, our
conclusion and some prospects for future research are presented in section 8.
2
Notation
Here, following [24], a few of the notations used in the paper are introduced:
• x and y: the coordinates that describe the paper surface. For 3D models, z
represents the depth coordinate.
• φ: the fiber field, which represents the fiber structure. If a point belongs to
a fiber, φ is 1 at that point, otherwise φ is 0.
• σ: the ink field, which is 1 at a point if ink exists at that point, and is
0 otherwise. Another variable related to the ink is σ̂. σ̂ is the same as σ,
except that its values are 1 and −1 respectively.
3
The modified Ising Model
The modified Ising models have been used in the study of solid-fluid interaction at mesoscopic scale [24, 27, 26, 31, 32, 25]. It assumes a lattice-based
porous representation for the solid structure. Instead of modeling the interaction using complex transport coefficients of the macroscopic equations, it uses
simple energy exchange mechanisms among the neighbors in the lattice. At
this scale, the paper is almost equivalent to a fiber structure which consisting of a collection of fibers. Usually, the fiber structure is discretized into a
collection of small cells. The material properties are assigned to the cells and
to the mechanisms that control the interaction between neighboring cells. For
example, a 3D model has been proposed in [27] to study the propagation of
ink in the fabric to study the wetting process along a fiber bundle. The model
is based on an energy functional:
Et,0 =
X
(Eg,i + Ec,i + Ea,i )
(1)
i
where Et,0 is the total interaction energy of the ink/paper material, in which
Eg,i , Ec,i , Ea,i are the gravitational, cohesive, and adhesive energy terms respectively:
Eg,i = Gg σ̂i zi ,
Ec,i = −c1 σ̂i S1,i ,
5
Ec,i = −A1 σ̂i F1,i
where Gg is the gravity constant, σ̂i is the ink state of the cell i (also called
the spin), and zi is the vertical position of that cell. σ̂i is 1 if the cell is filled
with the fluid, and -1 if the cell in empty. S1,i is the ink state of the neighbors:
X
S1,i =
σ̂j ,
j∈N1,i
where N1,i is the set of cells that are the immediate neighbors of cell i: N1,i =
{j|i and j share a wall}. A schematic diagram of N1 is shown in Figure 3(a).
P
The term i Ec,i stands for the cohesive energy between fluid particles. The
last term in the total energy (1) is the adhesive term, and accounts for the
adhesive interaction between the fluid and solid particles, in which
X
F1,i =
φj ,
j∈N1,i
where φj is the state of cell i with respect to the solid material. If the cell
is a part of a fiber, then φj is 1, and if not, it is -1. As the fiber structure
is stationary, the field φ is also stationary and fixed. The solution is an ink
distribution σ̂ that minimizes Et . Because of the very local nature of the
model, a thermodynamic approach for solving the minimization problem has
been used [27], in which spin changes are applied in a Monte-Carlo way until
the system converges to its minimum. In each round, two cells are selected
randomly on the interface between the fluid and the air. A random number is
generated, and, if it is less than the probability of spin exchange, given by the
Boltzmann law, the spins of two cells will be exchanged [24].
(a)
(b)
Fig. 3. Schematics of neighbors around a typical cell in a 3D structure. a) First-layer
neighbors. One side of the cells is colored. b) The second-layer neighbors referred
to in section 6. In order to visualize the first-layer neighbors inside the structure,
some of the sides are transparent.
6
The fluid propagation of this model is very local. Therefore, any marching or
local evolution-based methods for finding the solution are slow, and local oscillations may dominate the evolution. This is the reason why thermodynamicsbased approaches, such as spin exchange, have been used in the literature
[24, 27].
In this work, we follow the same modeling methodology to describe the paper
structure at the mesoscopic scale. In order to be able to simulate the transient
and finite-volume flows, we modify the energy term to enable us to control the
fluid volume within the computational space, and we develop a new numerical
method to solve the associated optimization problem. The latter method is
based on a modified heuristic optimization process based on a genetic algorithm (GA) [28] and a newly introduced finite-volume boundary condition. In
this way, the numerical solution can be obtained for the finite-volume case at
a reasonable computational cost, despite the very local nature of the modified
Ising models. Although our model could be calibrated to simulate transient
flows, in this work we focus only on the steady-state solution. This is because
the final ink distribution is more important than the transient flow in the
seepage of ink through paper. Although the transient seepage of ink over long
periods of time (hundreds of years) is also of great interest in modeling the
degradation of historical documents, an approximation of the transient flow is
enough, and can be produced using our model. Also, in the case of an infinite
volume of fluid, we will use the graph cuts approach [7]. This global optimizer
is very fast and outperforms all local/marching-based methods.
It is worth noting that the porous medium has been modeled in another
work as a set of containers of variable-size which are connected by pipes. The
throughputs of the pipes are also variable, depending on the local parameters
of the medium [23]. The model can be considered as a very local diffusion
model which has been discretized at the size of pores. It is available as a part
of the commercially available Pore-Cor Research Suite [23].
4
Problem statement
A paper document is available and a spatial distribution of the ink on the
surface of that paper is given. The volume of ink is finite. The 3D distribution
of the ink within the paper structure is required at mesoscopic scale. The paper
is considered as a fiber structure. The construction of the fiber structure will
be discussed in the next section, and the corresponding modified Ising model
for representing this finite volume fluid problem will be given in section 6. The
presence of ink in this discretized space is denoted by the field σ.
7
5
Fiber structure
To obtain the φ field that determines where we have solid material and where
we have empty space, we first need to have a fiber structure. In this work,
the fiber structure is created by placing fibers one by one on an imaginary
surface on random coordinates and random directions. Each individual fiber
is constructed of a chain of rectangular blocks. The blocks can rotate in parallel
to the surface, up to a maximum degree, which determines the stiffness of the
fibers. As fibers pile up on the surface, some of them bend, also this maximum
degree. The width and the height of each block, and total fiber length, are other
parameters of a fiber. A sample fiber structure is shown in Figure 4. As seen
in the figure, the paper is positioned face-down in order to better visualize
the internal volume of the fiber structure. This means that the gravity force
is upward in this case. The ink that would be placed on the paper surface will
be seen below the fiber structure in our model, and will propagate upward
because of cohesive and adhesive forces, as well as the gravity force. For the
sake of computation, the fiber structure and the air space between the fibers
are discretized into a collection of equivolume cells. The cells are referred to
using a single index, such as i, and the total computational space is denoted
by V .
(a)
(b)
(c)
Fig. 4. An example of a fiber structure. The red lines show the edges of the blocks
that compose the fibers, and each blue line is the guide line of a fiber, and passes
through the center of the bottom surface of the blocks of that. For better visualization, the fibers are extended in the vertical direction. a) A single fiber. b) A
collection of a few fibers. c) A fiber structure consisting of 100 fibers.
8
(a)
(b)
(c)
Fig. 5. A schematic diagram of the computational space used to simulate the ink
seepage. a) A 2D view of the computational space before the finite volume boundary
condition technique is applied. b) The same view after application of the finite
volume boundary condition technique. Now, the computational space is independent
of the ink volume. A refilling process ensures flow of the ink from an imaginary
reservoir to the finite-volume boundary. c) A 3D view of the computational space.
6
Formulation
We follow the modified Ising model paradigm, presented in subsection 3, to develop a model which is able to describe finite-volume fluid flow at mesoscopic
scale. First, we need to define the energy of the fluid-solid system. Three major
terms contribute to this energy: 1) the gravity term, 2) the term accounting for
the cohesion between the fluid molecules, and 3) the term accounting for the
adhesion between the fluid and the solid molecules. Although the energy function (1) accurately describes the fluid-solid interaction between the ink and
the paper structure, its mesoscopic nature makes it very local. Therefore, we
need to add additional constraints to complete the description of the problem
and take into account the other restrictions. We represent these constraints as
additional energy terms. The total energy in the modified Ising model can be
described as follows:
Et = Et,0 + EV =
X
(Eg,i + Ec,i + Ea,i ) + EV
(2)
i
where Et,0 and EV are the interaction energy and volume energy respectively.
The volume energy stands for the finite volume constraint and is discussed
later. Because of the high computational performance of our model, and to
obtain higher accuracy, we also use the second-layer neighbors [24]:
9
Eg,i = Gg σ̂i zi
Ec,i = − (c1 σ̂i S1,i + c2 σ̂i S2,i )
Ea,i = − (A0 σ̂i φi + A1 σ̂i F1,i + A2 σ̂i F2,i )
where Eg is the fraction of energy corresponding to gravitational force; Gg is
the gravity constant; σ̂i is the ink state of cell i, and zi is the vertical position
of that cell. Ec is the cohesive part of the energy between neighboring cells,
where c1 and c2 are the coefficients of the first- and second-layer neighbors,
and S1,i and S2,i are the ink states of the first- and second-layer neighbors:
S1,i =
X
σ̂j ,
S2,i =
j∈N1,i
X
σ̂j
j∈N2,i
where N1,i and N2,i are the sets of cells that are the immediate neighbors and
second-layer neighbors of cell i respectively:
{j|i and j share a wall.}
N1,i =
N2,i = {j|i and j share a N1 neighbor.}
Schematic diagrams of N1,i and N2,i are shown in Figure 3. Also, we use the
notation N1 for the set of all pairs (i, j) such that j ∈ N1,i or i ∈ N1,j .
Ea is the adhesive part of the energy between the fluid and the solid, where
A1 and A2 are adhesive coefficients for the first- and second-layer neighbors.
The state of the solid material at these layers is provided by F1,i and F2,i :
F1,i =
X
φj ,
j∈N1,i
F2,i =
X
φj
j∈N2,i
where the state of the solid material in each cell is represented by φi , the value
of which is 0 or 1, depending on whether the cell is a free space or a part of a
fiber. The self-adhesive coefficient is denoted by A0 . The second energy term
(2), the volume energy part, is discussed in the following subsection. As can
be seen from the definition of the energy, the energy is nonlinear in terms of
the field σ. We discuss this point in more detail in section 7.
6.1 Volume energy: EV
Total energy consists of both the interaction energy and the flow constraints.
The most important constraint is the finite (and fixed) volume of ink (fluid).
In other words, we need to force the incompressibility of the fluid via its fixed
dimensionless volume:
Vf luid = Vf luid,0 = constant
10
(3)
where Vf luid,0 is the initial volume of ink and Vf luid is the actual dimensionless volume, which can be expressed in terms of the σ̂ field using Vf luid =
P
1/2 i∈V (σ̂i + 1). This constraint can be added to the total energy in the form
of another energy term, EV :
Et = Et,0 + EV
Et = Et,0 + λ
X
i∈V
(σ̂i + 1) − 2Vf luid,0
!2
/(4V0 )
where λ is a positive Lagrangian coefficient, 4V0 is used for the sake of normalization, and V0 is the total volume of the computational space. The second
term stands as an energy penalty term to enforce the volume constrain.
Before looking for a numerical method to solve the problem, we first reformulate the energy terms in such a way that the interaction terms, and also the
range of the interaction, become more explicit.
We start with Et,0 :
Et,0 =
X
(Eg,i + Ec,i + Ea,i )
i∈V
=
X
Gg σ̂i zi
i
−
−
=
+
=
X
(c1 σ̂i S1,i + c2 σ̂i S2,i )
i
X
(A0 σ̂i φi + A1 σ̂i F1,i + A2 σ̂i F2,i )
i
X
i
(Gg σ̂i zi − A0 σ̂i φi − A1 σ̂i F1,i − A2 σ̂i F2,i )
i
(−c1 σ̂i S1,i − c2 σ̂i S2,i )
i
(Gg zi − A0 φi − A1 F1,i − A2 F2,i ) σ̂i
X
X
+
X
i
−c1 σ̂i
X
j∈N1,i
σ̂j +
X
i
−c2 σ̂i
X
j∈N2,i
σ̂j
If we define σi = 1/2(σ̂i + 1), i.e. σ̂i = 2σi − 1, we have:
Et,0 =
X
i∈V
D1,i σi +
X
(−4c1 ) σi σj +
X
(i,j)∈N2
(i,j)∈N1
where
11
(−4c2 ) σi σj
D̂1,i = 2(Gg zi − A0 φi − A1 F1,i − A2 F2,i + 2(26c1 + 98c2 ))
σ is zero for empty cells, and 1 for cells containing fluid. The first term in Et,0
is linear with respect to σ.
Now, the second term in the total energy can be reformulated:
V0 EV /λ =
X
(σ̂i + 1) − 2Vf luid,0
X
σi − Vf luid,0
X
σi
i∈V
=
i∈V
=
i∈V
XX
=
i∈V j∈V
=
!2
X
σi2 +
X
σi σj − 2Vf luid,0
i6=j
σi + Vf2luid,0
i∈V
σi σj − 2Vf luid,0
X
i∈V
/4
!2
− 2Vf luid,0
X
!2
X
σi
i∈V
σi σj − 2Vf luid,0
X
σi
i∈V
But, σi2 = σi
=
X
σi +
i∈V
i6=j
X
σi
i∈V
Therefore,
V0 EV /λ = (1 − 2Vf luid,0 )
X
i∈V
σi +
X
σi σj
i6=j
The total energy will be
Et = Et,0 + EV
=
X
D̂1,i σi +
i∈V
+ λ/V0
Et =
X
i
X
i6=j
X
X
(−4c1 ) σi σj +
σi σj + λ(1 − 2Vf luid,0 )/V0
D1,i σi +
X
(−4c2 ) σi σj
(i,j)∈N2
(i,j)∈N1
V1,(i,j) σi σj +
X
σ̂i
i∈V
X
(i,j)∈N2
(i,j)∈N1
V2,(i,j) σi σj +
X
V3,(i,j) σi σj
i6=j
(4)
where
12
D1,i = D̂1,i + λ(1 − 2Vf luid,0 )/V0
= 2(Gg zi − A0 φi − A1 F1,i − A2 F2,i
+λ(1 − 2Vf luid,0 )/(2V0 ) + 2(26c1 + 98c2 ))
V1,(i,j) = −4c1
V2,(i,j) = −4c2
V3,(i,j) = λ/V0
7
Solution of the variational problem and the experimental results
Before discussing the numerical method, we discuss the parameters. c1 is
selected as the reference parameter: c1 = 1. To limit the influence of the
second- and third-order terms, we assume that 98c2 << 26c1 ⇒ c2 = c1 /8 and
Gg zmax << c1 26 ⇒ Gg = c1 /zmax . Please note that 26 and 98 are the numbers
of first- layer and second-layer neighbors respectively. In the adhesive terms,
A0 is the key parameter. We choose A0 = c1 /2, in order to have stronger
cohesive that adhesive behavior. The other parameters are A1 = 2/3A0 and
A2 = 1/2A1 [24].
The optimization problem (4) is a nonlinear combinatorial optimization problem, which should be solved in a very large variable space. Figure 5 visualizes
the computational space of the problem. The initial state of the ink is also
shown in the figure. The solution is very far from the initial solution. As has
been discussed in the related work section, local optimizers are usually used
to move toward the global solution. However, because of the discrete nature of
the problem, local forces (which are available at the microscopic scale) are not
available to derive the system. For example, in [24], thermodynamics-based
approach is used. Although these approaches are very helpful in evolving the
simulation, the computational cost can be very high. Global optimizers, such
as graph cuts [7], could be helpful. However, because of the ink-volume restriction in our problem, the basic requirement of this optimizer, which is that the
range of interactions be limited to neighbors, is not met. Therefore, we only
use this optimizer for the case of an infinite-volume fluid.
7.1 Solution via Global Optimization
As discussed above, the final ink distribution would be far from its initial distribution. Therefore, a global solver could result in a fast and economic solution.
However, because of some restrictions in the problem, mainly the finite-volume
restriction on the ink fluid and the mesoscopic scale of the energy function,
the available global optimizers cannot be applied. The only exception is when
13
the finite-volume restriction is removed. Below, a fast solution is presented
using one of the powerful global optimizers, graph cuts [7].
In [7, 8], 1 the global solution to any optimization problem has been found if
the problem can be expressed in the form of two terms, the first one being
linear with respect to the variables, and the second perhaps being nonlinear
(second-degree term), just between the neighbors:
E=
X
i∈V
Di (σi ) +
X
V(i,j) (σi , σj )
(5)
(i,j)∈N1
where Di is a data penalty function, and V(i,j) is an interaction potential.
Comparing the general form of energy suitable for graph cuts methods (equation (5)) and our energy functional (4), we can see that the main terms that
prevent us from applying the graph cuts method to this problem are the last
two in (4) which count on N2 neighbors and on almost all the cells in the
computational domain respectively. The restriction posed by the first term
could be removed by adding N2 neighbors to the graph cuts formalism, which
is what we did in our implementation here. However, the second term in (4)
cannot be handled by this global optimizer, unless we set λ = 0 to drop this
term, which means that there is no restriction on the fluid volume. In other
words, we can solve the problem using the graph cuts method in the case of
infinite fluid volume.
1
http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/21310,
http://www.cs.ucl.ac.uk/staff/V.Kolmogorov/software.html
14
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Fig. 6. A typical example of the ink propagation in the fiber structure under infinite-volume condition: a) The fiber structure. b) The φ field, which represents the
fiber material. c) The σ field, which represents the ink distribution. d) The ink and
fiber together.
Figure 6 shows a typical example of the case of infinite fluid volume case. The
fiber structure and ink distribution are shown. Because of the infinite-volume
nature of this example, the ink fills the structure completely.
7.2 Solution via a genetic algorithm
A new method is developed in this subsection to solve (4) under the finitevolume condition (λ 6= 0). For this purpose, a modified genetic algorithm
(GA) is introduced. The details of the method are given in Algorithm 1. It
works, along with the finite volume boundary condition introduced in section
6, to reduce the computational cost. As can be seen from the algorithm, the
method is quasi-linear, because it updates the nonlinear terms, S1,i and S2,i ,
only on certain time intervals (100 iterations, in our work here). In this way,
the energy functional will be linear in each GA iteration. Also, we limit the
scope of the GA domain to the regions around the ink-air interface. The σi
variables in these regions are considered as genes, and then are composed as a
chromosome of variable-size in each interaction. The binary nature of each σi
makes them intrinsically compatible with the GA approach. The cost function,
which is linear, is low computational cost. A sample convergence curve of the
15
energy is shown in Figure 7. The updating intervals of the nonlinear terms are
shown with red lines. As can be seen in the figure, the convergence is smooth
and stable.
(a)
(b)
Fig. 7. The profile of the energy of the system, along with the computational time
as a measure of convergence. a) The axis of the time is linear. b) The axis of the
time is logarithmic. The red lines indicate the moments when the variables S1 and
S2 are updated. The blue curve shows the spontaneous change in the energy along
the computational time. As can be seen in the figure, the convergence is smooth
and stable.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Algorithm 1: The modified genetic algorithm used to minimize the energy
functional
Set σi = 0 for all cells with z ≥ 0, σi = 1 for all cells with z1 < z < 0 where
z1 is the depth of finite-volume boundary. If the volume of the finite-volume
is bigger than the ink volume, Vf luid,0 , fill just a part of finite-volume
boundary of the same volume of Vf luid,0 ;
Initialize S1,i and S2,i ;
repeat
for k = 1 to 100 do
Extract the cells that are on the interface of ink and air;
Compose the genetic chromosome by aligning σi variables of the
extracted interface cells;
minimize Et with respect to the created chromosome using genetic
algorithm;
Apply the optimal values back to σi of the interface cells, and update
the interface front;
If the ink volume in the computational space is less than Vf luid,0 , refill
the finite-volume boundary cells (z1 < z < 0);
end
Update S1,i and S2,i ;
until The change in the energy is less than 0.1 percent;
In the first example, shown in Figure 8, a small amount of ink flows into a
16
fiber structure. The finite volume of the ink is implemented by limiting the
size of the finite-volume reservoir (see Figure 5(b)). The ink propagates into
the fiber structure and settles around the fibers. We use the error in the ink
volume (kVf luid − Vf luid,0 k) at the end of computations as a control parameter.
This error is zero for the result of the method, and confirms the ability of our
model to simulate finite-volume ink/paper interaction.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Fig. 8. The ink propagation in the fiber structure when the ink volume is finite: a)
The fiber structure. b) The φ field, which represents the fiber material. c) The σ
field, which represents the ink distribution. d) The ink and fiber together.
In the second example, Figure 9, we study the extreme case of infinite-volume
ink. Similar to Figure 6 of the graph cuts method, the ink fills the computational volume.
17
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Fig. 9. The ink propagation in the fiber structure with a high volume of ink: a) The
fiber structure. b) The φ field, which represents the fiber material. c) The σ field,
which represents the ink distribution. d) The ink and fiber together.
In another extreme case (Figure 10), we consider a very thin paper structure.
As can be seen in the figure, the ink is mostly confined to the fiber area, despite
the large amount of ink. When we increase the ink volume drastically, again
the ink fills the whole computational space (Figure 11). However, it should
be noted that this is a very rare case. Also, it is worth noting that the error
in the ink volume is zero in all the cases. This is mostly because of a high λ
value (100 in this work), which enforces the finite-volume restriction.
18
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Fig. 10. The ink propagation in the fiber structure when the fiber structure is very
thin: a) The fiber structure. b) The φ field, which represents the fiber material. c)
The σ field, which represents the ink distribution. d) The ink and fiber together.
19
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Fig. 11. The ink propagation in the fiber structure with a high volume of ink in
a thin fiber structure: a) The fiber structure. b) The φ field, which represents the
fiber material. c) The σ field, which represents the ink distribution. d) The ink and
fiber together.
8
Conclusion and future prospects
A new Ising model for the simulation of fluid seepage into a porous medium
under the finite-volume fluid condition is developed. The model can be used
to study fluid/solid interaction at mesoscopic scale. The computational cost is
reduced by introducing quasi-linear behavior and a new finite volume boundary condition. Also, a modified genetic algorithm is introduced to solve the
associated time-dependent optimization problem. The model is used to produce ink distribution in the fiber structure under a finite-volume restriction.
We used the difference in the ink volume before and after simulation as the error measure, in order to assess the accuracy of the model. The results satisfied
the volume restriction, showing zero error values.
In future work, we will use this model to obtain the diffusion coefficients of the
macroscopic-scale models. This will help to avoid the need to perform largescale simulations at mesoscopic scale, while at the same time transferring the
physical properties of the mesoscopic interactions to the macroscopic scale.
20
References
[1] Urpo Aaltosalmi. Fluid flow in porous media with the lattice-Boltzmann
method. PhD thesis, University of Jyväskylä, July 2005.
[2] Abdelaziz Abid. ‘Memory of the world’: Preserving our documentary
heritage. Museum International, 49(1):40–45, 1997.
[3] M M H Megat Ahmed, D T Gethin, T C Claypole, and B J Roylance. A
model for ink impression into a porous substrate. Journal of Physics D:
Applied Physics, (16):2276, 1997.
[4] Mikko Alava and Kaarlo Niskanen. The physics of paper. Reports on
Progress in Physics, 69(3):669–723, 2006.
[5] Mauro Barni, Jean-Angelo Beraldin, Christian Lahanier, , and Alessandro
Piva. Recent advances in applications to visual cultural heritage. IEEE
Signal Processing Magazine, 25(4):1–134, July 2008. Special issue.
[6] D. A. Barry, C. T. Miller, P. J. Culligan, and K. Bajracharya. Analysis
of split operator methods for nonlinear and multispecies groundwater
chemical transport models. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation,
43(3-6):331–341, March 1997.
[7] Y. Boykov and V. Kolmogorov. An experimental comparison of mincut/max- flow algorithms for energy minimization in vision. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 26(9):1124–1137,
2004.
[8] Y.Y. Boykov and M.-P. Jolly. Interactive graph cuts for optimal boundary
& region segmentation of objects in n-d images. In ICCV’01, volume 1,
pages 105–112 vol.1, 2001.
[9] Pedro Castro, R. Almeida, and J. Pinto. Restoration of Double-Sided
Ancient Music Documents with Bleed-Through, volume 4756/2008, pages
940–949. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, 2007.
[10] Chih-Yuan Chang. Simulation of molten metal through a unidirectional
fibrous preform during mmc processing. Journal of Materials Processing
Technology, 209(9):4337–4342, May 2009.
[11] L. Chen, J. Zhu, M. Young, and R. Susfalk. Modeling polyacrylamide
transport in water delivery canals. In ASA-CSSA-SSSA International
Annual Meetings, pages 294–6, Indianapolis, IN, Nov. 12–16 2006.
[12] R E Collins. Flow of Fluids Through Porous Materials. Reinhold, New
York, 1961.
[13] Joo Marcelo Monte da Silva, Rafael Dueire Lins, Fernando Mrio Junqueira
Martins, and Rosita Wachenchauzer. A new and efficient algorithm to
binarize document images removing back-to-front interference. Journal
of Universal Computer Science, 14(2):299–313, January 2008.
[14] Fadoua Drira, Frank Le Bourgeois, and Hubert Emptoz. Restoring ink
bleed-through degraded document images using a recursive unsupervised
classification technique. Document Analysis Systems VII, pages 38–49,
2006.
[15] E. Dubois and A. Pathak. Reduction of bleed-through in scanned
21
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
[26]
[27]
[28]
[29]
manuscript documents. In Proc. IS&T Image Processing, Image Quality,
Image Capture Systems Conference (PICS2001), pages 177–180, Montreal, Canada, April 2001.
Damien Durville. Finite element simulation of textile materials at mesoscopic scale. In Finite element modelling of textiles and textile composites,
pages 1–14, Saint-Petersbourg , Russia, September 26–28 2007.
Reza Farrahi Moghaddam and Mohamed Cheriet. Application of multilevel classifiers and clustering for automatic word-spotting in historical
document images. In ICDAR’09, pages 511–515, Barcelona, Spain, July
26–29 2009.
Reza Farrahi Moghaddam and Mohamed Cheriet. Low quality document
image modeling and enhancement. IJDAR, 11(4):183–201, 2009.
Reza Farrahi Moghaddam and Mohamed Cheriet. A multi-scale framework for adaptive binarization of degraded document images. Pattern
Recognition, 43(6):2186–2198, June 2010.
Reza Farrahi Moghaddam and Mohamed Cheriet. A variational approach
to degraded document enhancement. IEEE Transactions on Pattern
Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 32(8):1347–1361, 2010.
Reza Farrahi Moghaddam, David Rivest-Hénault, Itay Bar-Yosef, and
Mohamed Cheriet. A unified framework based on the level set approach
for segmentation of unconstrained double-sided document images suffering from bleed-through. In ICDAR’09, pages 441–445, Barcelona, Spain,
July 26–29 2009.
Yi Huang, Michael S. Brown, and Dong Xu. A framework for reducing
ink-bleed in old documents. In CVPR2008, 2008.
G.M. Laudone, G.P. Matthews, and P.A.C. Gane. Modelling diffusion from simulated porous structures. Chemical Engineering Science,
63(7):1987–1996, April 2008.
D. Lukas, E. Glazyrina, and N. Pan. Computer simulation of liquid wetting dynamics in fiber structures using the Ising model. Journal of the
Textile Institute, 88(2):149–161, 1997.
D. Lukas, N. Pan, A. Sarkar, M. Weng, J. Chaloupek, E. Kostakova,
L. Ocheretna, P. Mikes, M. Pociute, and E. Amler. Auto-model based
computer simulation of plateaurayleigh instability of mixtures of immiscible liquids. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications,
389(11):2164–2176, June 2010.
D. Lukas, V. Soukupova, N. Pan, and D. V. Parikh. Computer simulation
of 3-d liquid transport in fibrous materials. Simulation, 80(11):547–557,
2004.
David Lukas and Ning Pan. Wetting of a fiber bundle in fibrous structures. Polymer Composites, 24(3):314–322, 2003.
Melanie Mitchell. An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms. The MIT Press,
1998.
Javier L. Mroginski, H.Ariel Di Rado, Pablo A. Beneyto, and Armando M.
Awruch. A finite element approach for multiphase fluid flow in porous me22
[30]
[31]
[32]
[33]
[34]
[35]
[36]
[37]
[38]
[39]
[40]
[41]
[42]
dia. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 81(1):76–91, September
2010.
Britta Nestler, Ali Aksi, and Michael Selzer. Combined lattice boltzmann
and phase-field simulations for incompressible fluid flow in porous media. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 80(7):1458–1468, March
2010.
N. Pan and W. Zhong. Fluid transport phenomena in fibrous materials.
Textile Progress, 38(2):1–93, 2006.
A. Patnaik, R. S. Rengasamy, V. K. Kothari, and A. Ghosh. Wetting and
wicking in fibrous materials. Textile Progress, 38(1):1–105, 2006.
D. Qi and T. Uesaka. Numerical experiments on paper-fluid interaction
- permeability of a three-dimensional anisotropic fibre network. Journal
of Materials Science, 31(18):4865–4870, January 1996.
Tony Rath and R. Manmatha. Word spotting for historical documents.
IJDAR, 9(2):139–152, April 2007.
K. Roth. Scaling of water flow through porous media and soils. European
Journal of Soil Science, 59(1):125–130, 2008.
Toufik Sari and Abderrahmane Kefali. A search engine for Arabic documents. In 10th CIFED, pages 97–102, Rouen, France, 2008.
Chew Lim Tan, Ruini Cao, Peiyi Shen, Qian Wang, Julia Chee, and
Josephine Chang. Removal of interfering strokes in double-sided document images. In Applications of Computer Vision, 2000, Fifth IEEE
Workshop on., pages 16–21, Palm Springs, CA, 2000.
Anna Tonazzini, Emanuele Salerno, and Luigi Bedini. Fast correction of
bleed-through distortion in grayscale documents by a blind source separation technique. IJDAR, 10(1):17–25, June 2007.
H. H. Vaziri, Y. Xiao, R. Islam, and A. Nouri. Numerical modeling of
seepage-induced sand production in oil and gas reservoirs. Journal of
Petroleum Science and Engineering, 36(1-2):71–86, October 2002.
Voillot C Vincent R, Rueff M. 3-d simulation of handsheets made of
different pulps. In Proceedings Model validation workshop, pages 71–78,
Espoo, Finland, 6 October 2005. COST 36.
Xiujin Wang and Jizhou Sun. The researching about water and ink motion model based on soil-water dynamics in simulating for the chinese
painting. In Jizhou Sun, editor, Image and Graphics, 2007. ICIG 2007.
Fourth International Conference on, pages 880–885, 2007.
Christian Wolf. Document ink bleed-through removal with two hidden
Markov random fields and a single observation field. IEEE Transactions
on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 32(3):431–447, 2009.
23
A
Macroscopic-scale models
Here, we review a few related macroscopic-scale models. These models work
on continuum media, and therefore follow a different notation compared to
the main text.
A.1
2D Diffusion Model
Analysis at the macroscopic scale using generic diffusion-based models has
been carried out in [18] by introducing a simple model consisting of two layers
representing the paper material. The model ignores the fiber structure of the
paper, which controls the very local flow of the ink. In that work, a diffusionbased model was developed to replicate the bleed-through effect in doublesided documents. It assumes that there are two independent distributions of
ink on the recto and verso sides of a document: srecto and sverso . The generic
governing equation of that model is
∂u
= DIFF (u, srecto , crecto ) + DIFF (u, sverso , cverso )
∂t
(A.1)
where DIFF (u, s, c) represents a diffusion process between the source layer
s and the target layer u with the diffusion coefficients c. The target field u
is continuous and represents the 2D distribution of ink on the recto side of
the document [18]. The diffusion coefficients define the physics converging the
phenomena. For example, for the verso diffusion, we have:
cverso =
d
1
,
2
2
2 1 + s2
1 + (sverso − u) /σb
verso /σink
(A.2)
where the parameter d is the ratio of the verso diffusion magnitude compared
to that of the normal diffusion on the recto side. The parameter σb controls
the degree of ink seepage through the paper, and σink is a general parameter
that restricts diffusion for just the ink (which corresponds to near-zero values
on s and u). The coefficient cverso has been designed in that work in such a way
that it preserves the nonlinear nature of the ink seepage and also takes into
account the spatial diffusion and dependency of the ink distribution within the
paper material (for more details, see [18]). An example of the output of the
model is presented in Figure A.1. The model is able to create bleed-through
signatures in a realistic way. It is worth noting that the model is not directly
inferred from the physical ink seepage phenomenon, but instead, the diffusion
coefficient is selected as a closed form based on the empirical understanding
of the phenomenon. However, the formula for the diffusion coefficients is the
main concern, and it should be verified by the simulation models at lower-level
scales.
24
Fig. A.1. An example of bleed-through effect generated using the diffusion-based
model [18]. Left side: The recto and verso side ink distributions before the
bleed-though effect. Right side: The final output of the diffusion model. It simulates the bleed-through interference.
A.2
3D macroscopic models
A better description of ink seepage could be obtained using 3D models. Under slow flow conditions, the flow in the porous substrate can be described
by Darcy’s equation (derived from the Navier-Stokes equations in cylindrical
coordinate system) [3, 12]:
!
1 ∂p
∂ 2p
r
+ 2 =0
r
∂r
∂z
(A.3)
where p is the fluid pressure, and the velocity components are given by
ur =
−φ ∂p
,
µ ∂r
uz =
−φ ∂p
µ ∂z
Here, µ is the dynamic viscosity, and φ is the permeability. These equations
are appropriate when the porous skeleton is saturated. However, in the case of
printing onto a dry porous substrate, computation of the flow into the skeleton
is also necessary. This may be achieved using an approach which computes the
position of the metal front in a casting simulation [10]. Numerically, this is
described by an additional equation, the hyperbolic transport equation:
∂ σ̂
∂ σ̂
dσ̂
+ ur
+ uz
=0
dt
∂r
∂z
(A.4)
where σ̂ is a scalar quantity to be transported. For example, σ̂ = −1 may
represent a dry position and σ̂ = 1 may represent a wet position. Usually, a
numerical solution of the model is obtained using the finite element method
[29]. The model is macroscopic, and does not consider individual fibers in
the paper structure. The material properties are described using averaged
25
variables, such as µ. The model is able to follow the transit flow of ink/water
through the substrate.
A.3
Flow-based models
The non-zero flow in a porous medium could be modeled as a flow of incompressible viscose fluid, as follows [1]:
∂
−1
u + (u · ∇) u =
∇p + ν∇2 u + g
∂t
ρ
(A.5)
where u is the velocity vector, g is the gravity constant vector, ν = µ/ρ and
µ is the dynamic viscosity. In the case of stationary flow with no friction, we
have the Stokes equation:
∇p − ρGg = µ∇2 u
(A.6)
where Gg is the gravity constant, and the space changes of velocity are considered negligible ((u∇) u = 0). In the literature, this model has been solved
using Lattice-Boltzmann hydrodynamics [1, 33, 30]. By definition, the model
assumes a stationary flow. This means that transitional flow cannot be covered
by this model, and also the amount of fluid should be infinite. Moreover, this
assumption forces a periodic boundary condition. Therefore, the model is not
suitable for the study of ink propagation through the paper. However, there
are some models based on Navier-Stokes equations adapted to free-boundary
fluid flows.
26
| 5cs.CE
|
arXiv:1701.05134v1 [math.GR] 18 Jan 2017
On Hσ -permutably embedded and Hσ -subnormaly embedded
subgroups of finite groups ∗
Wenbin Guo, Chi Zhang
Department of Mathematics, University of Science and Technology of China,
Hefei 230026, P. R. China
E-mail: [email protected]
Alexander N. Skiba, Darya A. Sinitsa
Department of Mathematics, Francisk Skorina Gomel State University,
Gomel 246019, Belarus
E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract
Let G be a finite group. Let σ = {σi |i ∈ I} be a partition of the set of all primes P and n an
integer. We write σ(n) = {σi |σi ∩ π(n) 6= ∅}, σ(G) = σ(|G|). A set H of subgroups of G is said
to be a complete Hall σ-set of G if every member of H \ {1} is a Hall σi -subgroup of G for some
σi and H contains exact one Hall σi -subgroup of G for every σi ∈ σ(G). A subgroup A of G is
called: (i) a σ-Hall subgroup of G if σ(|A|) ∩ σ(|G : A|) = ∅; (ii) σ-permutable in G if G possesses
a complete Hall σ-set H such that AH x = H x A for all H ∈ H and all x ∈ G. We say that a
subgroup A of G is Hσ -permutably embedded in G if A is a σ-Hall subgroup of some σ-permutable
subgroup of G.
We study finite groups G having an Hσ -permutably embedded subgroup of order |A| for each
subgroup A of G. Some known results are generalized.
1
Introduction
Throughout this paper, all groups are finite and G always denotes a finite group. Moreover, n is an
integer, P is the set of all primes, and if π ⊆ P, then π ′ = P \ π. The symbol π(n) denotes the set of
all primes dividing n; as usual, π(G) = π(|G|), the set of all primes dividing the order of G. We use
nπ to denote the π-part of n, that is, the largest π-number dividing n; np denotes the largest degree
of p dividing n.
∗
Research is supported by a NNSF grant of China (Grant # 11371335) and Wu Wen-Tsun Key Laboratory of
Mathematics of Chinese Academy of Sciences
0
Keywords: finite group, σ-Hall subgroup, σ-subnormal subgroup, σ-nilpotent group, Hσ -permutably embedded
subgroup.
0
Mathematics Subject Classification (2010): 20D10, 20D15, 20D30
1
In what follows, σ = {σi |i ∈ I} is some partition of P, that is, P = ∪i∈I σi and σi ∩ σj = ∅ for all
i 6= j; Π is a subset of σ and Π′ = σ \ Π.
Let σ(n) = {σi |σi ∩ π(n) 6= ∅} and σ(G) = σ(|G|). Then we say that G is σ-primary [1] if G is a
σi -group for some σi ∈ σ.
A set H of subgroups of G is said to be a complete Hall σ-set of G [2, 3] if every member of
H \ {1} is a Hall σi -subgroup of G for some σi and H contains exact one Hall σi -subgroup of G for
every σi ∈ σ(G). We say that G is σ-full if G possesses a complete Hall σ-set. Throughout this
paper, G is always supposed to be a σ-full group.
A subgroup A of G is called [1]: (i) a σ-Hall subgroup of G if σ(|A|) ∩ σ(|G : A|) = ∅; (ii)
σ-subnormal in G if there is a subgroup chain
A = A0 ≤ A1 ≤ · · · ≤ At = G
such that either Ai−1 E Ai or Ai /(Ai−1 )Ai is σ-primary for all i = 1, . . . , t; (iii) σ-quasinormal or
σ-permutable in G if G possesses a complete Hall σ-set H such that AH x = H x A for all H ∈ H and
all x ∈ G. In particular, A is called S-quasinormal or S-permutable in G [4, 5] provided AP = P A
for all Sylow subgroups P of G.
Definition 1.1. We say that a subgroup A of G is Hσ -subnormally (respectively Hσ -permutably,
Hσ -normally) embedded in G if A is a σ-Hall subgroup of some σ-subnormal (respectively σpermutable, normal) subgroup of G.
In the special case, when σ = {{2}, {3}, . . .}, the definition of Hσ -normally embedded subgroups
is equivalent to the concept of Hall normally embedded subgroups in [6], the definition of Hσ permutably embedded subgroups is equivalent to the concept of Hall S-quasinormally embedded
subgroups in [7] and the definition of Hσ -subnormally embedded subgroups is equivalent to the
concept of Hall subnormally embedded subgroups in [8].
Example 1.2. (i) For any σ, all σ-Hall subgroups and all σ-subnormal subgroups of any group
S are Hσ -subnormally embedded in S. Now, let G = (C7 ⋊ C3 ) × A5 , where C7 ⋊ C3 is a non-abelian
group of order 21 and A5 is the alternating group of degree 5, and let H = (C7 ⋊ C3 )A, where A is a
Sylow 2-subgroup of A5 . Let σ = {σ1 , σ2 }, where σ1 = {7} and σ2 = {7}′ . Then H is σ-subnormal
in G and C3 A5 is a σ-Hall subgroup of G. In view of Lemma 2.1(1)(5) below, the subgroup C3 A is
neither σ-subnormal in G nor Hσ -normally embedded in G.
(ii) For any σ, all σ-Hall subgroups and all σ-permutable subgroups of any group S are Hσ permutably embedded in S. Now, let p > q > r be primes, where r 2 divides q − 1. Let σ = {σ1 , σ2 },
where σ1 = {q, r} and σ2 = {q, r}′ . Let H = Q ⋊ R be a group of order qr 2 , where CH (Q) = Q. Let
P be a simple Fp H-module which is faithful for H and G = P ⋊ H. Let R1 be a subgroup of R of
order r. Then the subgroup V = P R1 is σ-permutable in G and R1 is a σ-Hall subgroup of V . Hence
R1 is Hσ -permutably embedded in G. It is also clear that G has no an S-permutable subgroup W
such that R1 is a Hall subgroup of W , so R1 is neither Hσ -normally embedded nor S-permutably
2
embedded in G.
(iii) For any σ, all σ-Hall subgroups and all normal subgroups of any group S are Hσ -normally
embedded in S. Now, let P be a simple F11 (C7 ⋊ C3 )-module which is faithful for C7 ⋊ C3 . Let
G = (P ⋊ (C7 ⋊ C3 )) × A5 . Let σ = {σ1 , σ2 }, where σ1 = {5, 7, 11} and σ2 = {5, 7, 11}′ . Then the
subgroup M = (P ⋊ C7 ) × A5 is normal in G and a subgroup B of A5 of order 12 is σ-Hall subgroup
of M , so B is Hσ -normally embedded in G. Finally, if σ = {σ1 , σ2 }, where σ1 = {7} and σ2 = {7}′ ,
then B is not Hσ -normally embedded in G.
Recall that G is σ-nilpotent [9] if G = H1 × · · · × Ht for some σ-primary groups H1 , . . . , Ht . The
σ-nilpotent residual GNσ of G is the intersection of all normal subgroups N of G with σ-nilpotent
quotient G/N , GN denotes the nilpotent residual of G. It is clear that every subgroup of a σ-nilpotent
group G is σ-permutable and σ-subnormal in G.
Theorem 1.3. Let H = {1, H1 , . . . Ht } be a complete Hall σ-set of G and D = GNσ . Then any
two of the following conditions are equivalent:
(i) G has an Hσ -permutably embedded subgroup of order |A| for each subgroup A of G.
(ii) D is a complemented cyclic of square-free order subgroup of G and |σi ∩ π(G)| = 1 for all i
such that σi ∩ π(D) 6= ∅.
(iii) For each set {A1 , . . . , At }, where Ai is a subgroup (respectively normal subgroup) of Hi for
all i = 1, . . . , t, G has an Hσ -permutably embedded (respectively Hσ -normally embedded) subgroup
of order |A1 | · · · |At |.
Let F be a class of groups. A subgroup H of G is said to be an F-covering subgroup of G [10,
VI, Definition 7.8] if H ∈ F and for every subgroup E of G such that H ≤ E and E/N ∈ F it follows
that E = N H. We say that a subgroup H of G is a σ-Carter subgroup of G if H is an Nσ -covering
subgroup of G, where Nσ is the class of all σ-nilpotent groups.
A group G is said to have a Sylow tower if G has a normal series 1 = G0 < G1 < · · · < Gt−1 <
Gt = G, where |Gi /Gi−1 | is the order of some Sylow subgroup of G for each i ∈ {1, . . . , t}. A chief
factor of G is said to be σ-central (in G) [1] if the semidirect product (H/K) ⋊ (G/CG (H/K)) is
σ-primary. Otherwise, H/K is called σ-eccentric (in G).
We say that G is a HσE-group if the following conditions are hold: (i) G = D ⋊ M , where
D = GNσ is a σ-Hall subgroup of G and |σ(D)| = |π(D)|; (ii) D has a Sylow tower and every chief
factor of G below D is σ-eccentric; (iii) M acts irreducibly on every M -invariant Sylow subgroup of
D.
We do not still know the structure of a group G having a Hσ -subnormally embedded subgroup
of order |A| for each subgroup A of G. Nevertheless, the following fact is true.
Theorem 1.4. Any two of the following conditions are equivalent:
(i) Every subgroup of G is Hσ -subnormally embedded in G.
3
(ii) Every σ-subnormal subgroup H of G is an HσE-group of the form H = D ⋊ M , where
D = H Nσ and M is a σ-Carter subgroup of H.
(iii) Every σ-subnormal subgroup of G is an HσE-group.
Now, let us consider some corollaries of Theorems 1.3 and 1.4. First note that since a nilpotent
group G possesses a normal subgroup of order n for each integer n dividing |G|, in the case when
σ = {{2}, {3}, . . .}, Theorem 1.3 covers Theorem 11 in [6], Theorem 2.7 in [8] and Theorems 3.1 and
3.2 in [7].
From Theorem 1.3 we also get the following result.
Corollary 1.5. Suppose that G possesses a complete Hall σ-set H = {1, H1 , . . . , Ht } such that
Hi is nilpotent for all i = 1, . . . , t. Then G has an Hσ -normally embedded subgroup of order |H| for
each subgroup H of G if and only if the nilpotent residual D = GN of G is cyclic of square-free order
and |σi ∩ π(G)| = 1 for all i such that σi ∩ π(D) 6= ∅.
In the case when σ = {{2}, {3}, . . .} we get from Corollary 1.5 the following known result.
Corollary 1.6 (Ballester-Bolinches, Qiao [11]). G has a Hall normally embedded subgroup of
order |H| for each subgroup H of G if and only if the nilpotent residual GN of G is cyclic of square-free
order.
On the basis of Theorems 1.3 and 1.4 we prove also the next two theorems.
Theorem 1.7. Any two of the following conditions are equivalent:
(i) Every subgroup of G is Hσ -normally embedded in G.
(ii) G = D ⋊ M is a HσE-group, where D is a cyclic group of square-free order and M is a
Dedekind group.
(iii) G = D ⋊ M , where D is a σ-Hall cyclic subgroup of G of square-free order with |σ(D)| =
|π(D)| and M is a Dedekind group.
In the case when σ = {{2}, {3}, . . .} we get from Theorem 1.7 the following known result.
Corollary 1.8 (Li, Liu [8]). Every subgroup of G is a Hall normally embedded subgroup of G if
and only if G = D ⋊ M , where D = GN is a cyclic Hall subgroup of G of square-free order and M
is a Degekind group.
Theorem 1.9. Any two of the following conditions are equivalent:
(i) Every subgroup of G is Hσ -permutably embedded in G.
(ii) G = D ⋊ M is a HσE-group, where D = GNσ is a cyclic group of square-free order.
(iii) G = D ⋊ M , where D is a σ-Hall cyclic subgroup of G of square-free order with |σ(D)| =
|π(D)| and M is σ-nilpotent
Corollary 1.10. Every subgroup of G is a Hall S-quasinormally embedded subgroup of G if and
only if G = D ⋊ M , where D = GN is a cyclic Hall subgroup of G of square-free order and M is a
4
Carter subgroup of G.
In conclusion of this section, consider the following example.
Example 1.11. Let 5 < p1 < p2 < · · · < pn be a set of primes and p a prime such that either
p > pn or p divides pi −1 for all i = 1, . . . , n. Let A be a group of order p and Pi a simple Fpi A-module
which is faithful for A. Let Li = Pi ⋊ A and
B = (. . . ((L1 L2 ) L3 ) · · · ) Ln
(see [10, p. 50]). We can assume without loss of generality that Li ≤ B for all i = 1, . . . , n. Let
G = B × A5 , where A5 is the alternating group of degree 5, and let σ be a partition of P such
that for some different indices i, j, i1 , . . . , in ∈ I we have p ∈ σi , {2, 3, 5} ⊆ σj and pk ∈ σik for all
k = 1, . . . , n. Then
D = P1 P2 · · · Pn = GNσ
is a σ-Hall subgroup of G and G = D ⋊ (A × A5 ).
We show that every subnormal subgroup H of G satisfies Condition (ii) in Theorem 1.4. If
= 1, it is evident. Hence we can assume without loss of generality A ≤ H since every p′ subgroup of G is σ-nilpotent. But then
H Nσ
H = (H ∩ D) ⋊ (A × (H ∩ A5 ))
by Lemma 2.1(4), where H ∩ D is a normal σ-Hall subgroup of H and M = A × (H ∩ A5 ) is a σnilpotent subgroup of H. Moreover, H ∩ A5 induces on every non-identity Sylow subgroup of H ∩ D a
non-trivial irreducible group of automorphisms. Therefore H Nσ = H ∩ D and |σ(H Nσ )| = |π(H Nσ )|.
It is also clear that M is a σ-Carter subgroup of H and every chief factor of H below H Nσ is σeccentric in H. Thus G satisfies Condition (ii) in Theorem 1.4, and so every subgroup H of G is
Hσ -subnormally embedded in G. On the other hand, the subgroup DAC2 , where C2 is a subgroup
of order 2 of G, is not Hall subnormally embedded in G since C2 is not a Sylow subgroup of any
subnormal subgroup of G.
Finally, if p divides pi − 1 for all i = 1, . . . , n, then |Pi | = pi for all i = 1, . . . , n, so G satisfies
Condition (ii) in Theorem 1.9 and hence satisfies Condition (ii) in Theorem 1.3.
2
Basic lemmas
An integer n is called a Π-number if σ(n) ⊆ Π. A subgroup H of G is called a Hall Π-subgroup of G
[1] if |H| is a Π-number and |G : H| is a Π′ -number.
Lemma 2.1 (See Lemma 2.6 in [1]). Let A, K and N be subgroups of G, where A is σ-subnormal
in G and N is normal in G.
(1) A ∩ K is σ-subnormal in K.
5
(2) If K is σ-subnormal in G, then A ∩ K and hA, Ki are σ-subnormal in G.
(3) AN/N is σ-subnormal in G/N .
(4) If H 6= 1 is a Hall Π-subgroup of G and A is not a Π′ -group, then A ∩ H 6= 1 is a Hall
Π-subgroup of A.
(5) If |G : A| is a σi -number, then O σi (A) = Oσi (G).
(6) If V /N is a σ-subnormal subgroup of G/N , then V is σ-subnormal in G.
(7) If K is a σ-subnormal subgroup of A, then K is σ-subnormal in G.
A group G is said to be σ-soluble [1] if every chief factor of G is σ-primary.
Lemma 2.2 (See Lemmas 2.8 and 3.2 and Theorems B and C in [1]). Let A, K and N be
subgroups of G, where A is σ-permutable in G and N is normal in G.
(1) AN/N is σ-permutable in G/N .
(2) If G is σ-soluble, then A ∩ K is σ-permutable in K.
(3) If N ≤ K, K/N is σ-permutable in G/N and G is σ-soluble, then K is σ-permutable in G.
(4) A is σ-subnormal in G.
(5) If G is σ-soluble and K is σ-permutable in G, then K ∩ A is σ-permutable in G.
Lemma 2.3. Let H be a normal subgroup of G. If H/H ∩ Φ(G) is a Π-group, then H has a
a Hall Π-subgroup, say E, and E is normal in G. Hence, if H/H ∩ Φ(G) is σ-nilpotent, then H is
σ-nilpotent.
Proof. Let D = OΠ′ (H). Then, since H ∩ Φ(G) is nilpotent, D is a Hall Π′ -subgroup of H.
Hence by the Schur-Zassenhaus theorem, H has a Hall Π-subgroup, say E. It is clear that H is
π ′ -soluble where π ′ = ∪σi ∈Π′ σi , so any two Hall Π-subgroups of H are conjugate. By the Frattini
argument,
G = HNG (E) = (E(H ∩ Φ(G)))NG (E) = NG (E).
Therefore E is normal in G. The lemma is proved.
Lemma 2.4. If every chief factor of G below D = GNσ is cyclic, then D is nilpotent.
Proof. Assume that this is false and let G be a counterexample of minimal order. Let R be a
minimal normal subgroup of G. Then from the G-isomorphism
D/D ∩ R ≃ DR/R = (G/R)Nσ
we know that every chief factor of G/R below DR/R is cyclic, so the choice of G implies that
D/D ∩ R ≃ DR/R is nilpotent. Hence R ≤ D and R is the unique minimal normal subgroup of
G. In view of Lemma 2.3, R Φ(G) and so R = CR (R) by [13, A, 15.2]. But by hypothesis, |R|
is a prime, hence G/R = G/CG (R) is cyclic, so G is supersoluble and so GNσ is nilpotent since
GNσ ≤ GN . The lemma is proved.
6
The following lemma is evident.
Lemma 2.5. The class of all σ-soluble groups is closed under taking direct products, homomorphic images and subgroups. Moreover, any extension of the σ-soluble group by a σ-soluble group is
a σ-soluble group as well.
Let A, B and R be subgroups of G. Then A is said to R-permute with B [12] if for some x ∈ R
we have AB x = B x A.
If G has a complete Hall σ-set H = {1, H1 , . . . , Ht } such that Hi Hj = Hj Hi for all i, j, then we
say that {H1 , . . . , Ht } is a σ-basis of G.
Lemma 2.6 (See Theorems A and B in [2]). Assume that G is σ-soluble.
(i) G has a σ-basis {H1 , . . . , Ht } such that for each i 6= j every Sylow subgroup of Hi G-permutes
with every Sylow subgroup of Hj .
(ii) For any Π, the following hold: G has a Hall Π-subgroup E, every Π-subgroup of G is contained
in some conjugate of E and E G-permutes with every Sylow subgroup of G.
Lemma 2.7. Let H, E and R be subgroups of G. Suppose that H is Hσ -subnormally embedded
in G and R is normal in G.
(1) If H ≤ E, then H is Hσ -subnormally embedded in E.
(2) HR/R is Hσ -subnormally embedded in G/R.
(3) If S is a σ-subnormal subgroup of G, then H ∩ S is Hσ -subnormally embedded in G.
(4) If |G : H| is σ-primary, then H is either a σ-Hall subgroup of G or σ-subnormal in G.
Proof. Let V be a σ-subnormal subgroup of G such that H is a σ-Hall subgroup of V .
(1) This assertion is a corollary of Lemma 2.1(1).
(2) In view of Lemma 2.1(3), V R/R is σ-subnormal subgroup of G/R. It is also clear that HR/R
is a σ-Hall subgroup of V R/R. Hence HR/R is Hσ -subnormally embedded in G/R.
(3) By Lemma 2.1(1)(2), V ∩ S is σ-subnormal both in V and in G and so H ∩ (V ∩ S) = H ∩ S
is a σ-Hall subgroup of V ∩ S by Lemma 2.1(4), as required.
(4) Assume that H is not σ-subnormal in G. Then H < V . By hypothesis, |G : H| is σ-primary,
say |G : H| is a σi -number. Then |V : H| is a σi -number. But H is a σ-Hall subgroup of V . Hence
H is a σ-Hall subgroup of G.
The lemma is proved.
Lemma 2.8. Let H be a σ-subnormal subgroup of a σ-soluble group G. If |G : H| is a σi -number
and B is a σi -complement of H, then G = HNG (B).
Proof. Assume that this lemma is false and let G be a counterexample of minimal order. Then
H < G, so G has a proper subgroup M such that H ≤ M , |G : MG | is a σi -number and H is
σ-subnormal in M . The choice of G implies that M = HNM (B). On the other hand, clearly that B
7
is a σi -complement of MG . Since G is σ-soluble, Lemma 2.6 and the Frattini argument imply that
G = MG NG (B) = M NG (B) = HNM (B)NG (B) = HNG (B).
The lemma is proved.
The following lemma is well-known (see for example [14, Lemma 3.29] or [15, 1.10.10]).
Lemma 2.9. Let H/K be an abelian chief factor of G and V a maximal subgroup of G such
that K ≤ V and HV = G. Then
G/VG ≃ (H/K) ⋊ (G/CG (H/K)).
3
Proofs of the results
Proof of Theorem 1.3. Without loss of generality we may assume that Hi is a σi -group for all
i = 1, . . . , t.
(i), (iii) ⇒ (ii) Assume that this is false. Then D 6= 1 and so t > 1.
First we prove the following claim.
(*) If p ∈ σi ∩ π(G), then G has a σ-permutable subgroup E with |E| = |G|σi′ p.
We can assume without loss of generality that i = 1. In fact, to prove Claim (*), we consistently
build the σ-permutable subgroups E2 , . . . , Et such that |H2 | · · · |Hj | divides |Ej | and |Ej |σ1 = p for
all j = 2, . . . , t.
By hypothesis, G has an Hσ -permutably embedded subgroup X of order p. Let V be a σpermutable subgroup of G such that X is a σ-Hall subgroup of V . Then |V |σ1 = p and G has a
complete Hall σ-set {1, K1 , . . . , Kt }, where Ki is a σi -group for all i = 1, . . . , t, such that V Ki = Ki V
for all i = 1, . . . , t. Let W = V K2 . Then |W |σ1 = p.
Next we show that there is an Hσ -permutably embedded subgroup Y of G such that |Y | = |W |.
It is enough to consider the case when Condition (iii) holds. Let A1 be a subgroup of H1 of order p,
A2 = H2 and Ai = Hi ∩ V for all i > 2. Then
|A2 | = |H2 | = |K2 |.
On the other hand, V ∩ Ki and V ∩ Hi are Hall σi -subgroups of V by Lemmas 2.1(4) and 2.2(4) and
so |V ∩ Ki | = |V ∩ Hi |. Also, for every i > 2 we have
|W : V ∩ Ki | = |V K2 : V ∩ Ki | = |V ||K2 | : |V ∩ K2 ||V ∩ Ki |
is a σi′ -number and hence V ∩ Ki = W ∩ Ki is a Hall σi -subgroup of W . Therefore,
|W | = p|H2 ||V ∩ H3 | . . . |V ∩ Ht |
8
and so G has an Hσ -permutably embedded subgroup Y of order
|W | = |A1 | · · · |At |
by hypothesis.
Let E2 be a σ-permutable subgroup of G such that Y is a σ-Hall subgroup of E2 . Then |H2 | = |K2 |
divides |E2 | and |E2 |σ1 = p. Now, arguing by induction, assume that G has a σ-permutable subgroup
Et−1 such that |H2 | · · · |Ht−1 | divides |Et−1 | and |Et−1 |σ1 = p. Then for some Hall σt -group L we
have Et−1 L = LEt−1 , and if Et = Et−1 L, then |Et | = |G|σ1′ p and Et clearly is σ-permutable in G, as
required.
Now, let p ∈ σi ∩ π(D) and let P be a Sylow p-subgroup of D. Then, by Claim (*), G possesses
a σ-permutable subgroup E such that |E| = |G|σi′ p. Lemma 2.2(4) implies that E is σ-subnormal
in G. Let j 6= i. Then Hjx ∩ E is a Hall σj -subgroup of E by Lemma 2.1(4), so |E : Hjx ∩ E| is
a σj ′ -number. But |Hjx | divides |E| and hence |Hjx | divides |Hj ∩ E|. Thererore Hjx ≤ E for all
x ∈ G. Thus HjG ≤ E and so G/EG is a σi -group. Hence D ≤ EG ≤ E, so |P | = p. Therefore G is
supersoluble by [10, IV, 2.9] and so every chief factor of G below D is cyclic. Hence D is nilpotent
by Lemma 2.4, so D is cyclic of square-free order. Hence D is complemented in G by Theorem 11.8
in [17].
Finally, assume that |σi ∩ π(G)| > 1 and let q ∈ σi ∩ π(G) \ {p}. Then G possesses a σ-permutable
subgroup F such that |F | = |G|σi′ q. Then D ≤ FG ≤ F. Therefore D ≤ E ∩ F and so p does not
divide |D|. This contradiction completes the proof of the implications (i) ⇒ (ii) and (iii) ⇒ (ii).
(ii) ⇒ (iii) First we show that for every i and for every subgroup (respectively normal subgroup)
Ai of Hi , there is an Hσ -permutably embedded (respectively Hσ -normally embedded) subgroup Ei
of G such that |Ei | = |Ai ||G|σi′ . Since G evidently is σ-soluble, it has a σi -complement E by Lemma
2.6. Therefore, it is enough to consider the case when Ai 6= 1 since every σ-Hall subgroup of G is an
Hσ -normally embedded in G.
First suppose that D ≤ E. Then E/D is normal in G since G/D is σ-nilpotent. Therefore
(E/D) × (Ai D/D) = EAi /D
is σ-permutable (respectively normal) in
G/D = (E/D) × (Hi D/D).
Hence Ei = EAi is σ-permutable (respectively normal) in G by Lemma 2.2(3) and |Ei | = |Ai ||G|σi′ .
Now suppose that D E. Then D ∩ Hi 6= 1, so Hi is a p-group for some prime p since for each
σi ∈ σ(D) we have |σi ∩ π(G)| = 1 by hypothesis. Hence H2 has a normal subgroup A such that
Dp ≤ A and |A| = |Ai |, where Dp is a Sylow p-subgroup of D. Then D ≤ AE. Moreover,
AE/D = (DA/D) × (ED/D)
9
since ED/D is a Hall σi′ -subgroup of G/D. Therefore Ei = AE is σ-permutable (respectively normal)
in G by Lemma 2.2(3) and |Ei | = |Ai ||G|σi′ .
Let E = E1 ∩ · · · ∩ Et . Then |E| = |A1 | . . . |At | since
(|G : Ei |, |G : Ej |) = 1
for all i 6= j. Note that Ei is either a σ-Hall subgroup of G or σ-permutable (respectively normal)
in G. Indeed, let V be a σ-permutable (respectively normal) subgroup of G such that Ei is a σ-Hall
subgroup of V . Assume that Ei is not σ-permutable (respectively not normal) in G. Then Ei < V .
Since |G : Ei | is σi -number, |V : Ei | is a σi -number. But Ei is a σ-Hall subgroup of V . Hence Ei = V
is a σ-Hall subgroup of G.
Assume that E1 , . . . , Er are σ-permutable (respectively normal) in G and Ei is a σ-Hall subgroup
of G for all i > r. Then E 0 = E1 ∩ · · · ∩ Er is σ-permutable (respectively normal) in G by Lemma
2.2(5) and E ∗ = Er+1 ∩ · · · ∩ Et is a σ-Hall subgroup of G. Now, E = E 0 ∩ E ∗ is a σ-Hall subgroup
of E 0 by Lemmas 2.1(4) and 2.2(4), so E is Hσ -permutably (respectively Hσ -normally) embedded
in G. Hence (ii) ⇒ (iii).
(ii) ⇒ (i) Since G is σ-soluble, H is σ-soluble. Hence H has a σ-basis {L1 , . . . , Lr } such that
Li ≤ Hi for all i = 1, . . . , r by Lemma 2.6. Therefore from the implication (ii) ⇒ (iii) we get that G
has an Hσ -permutably embedded subgroup of order |L1 | · · · |Lr | = |H|.
The theorem is proved.
Proof of Theorem 1.4. (i) ⇒ (ii) Assume that this is false and let G be a counterexample
of minimal order. Then some σ-subnormal subgroup V of G is not an HσE-group. Moreover,
D = GNσ 6= 1, so |σ(G)| > 1.
(1) Condition (ii) is true on every proper section H/K of G, that is, K 6= 1 or H 6= G. Hence
V = G (This directly follows from Lemma 2.7(1)(2) and the choice of G).
(2) G is σ-soluble.
In view of Claim (1) and Lemma 2.5, it is enough to show that G is not simple. Assume that
this is false. Then 1 is the only proper σ-subnormal subgroup of G since |σ(G)| > 1. Hence every
subgroup of G is a σ-Hall subgroup of G. Therefore for a Sylow p-subgroup P of G, where p is the
smallest prime divisor of |G|, we have |P | = p and so |G| = p by [10, IV, 2.8]. This contradiction
shows that we have (2).
(3) If |G : H| is a σi -number and H is not a σ-Hall subgroup of G, then H is σ-subnormal in G
and a σi -complement E of H is normal in G (This follows from Lemmas 2.7(4) and 2.8).
(4) D is a Hall subgroup of G. Hence D has a complement M in G.
Suppose that this is false and let P be a Sylow p-subgroup of D such that 1 < P < Gp , where
Gp ∈ Sylp (G). We can assume without loss of generality that Gp ≤ H1 . Let R be a minimal normal
subgroup of G contained in D.
10
Since D is soluble by Claim (2), R is a q-group for some prime q. Moreover, D/R = (G/R)Nσ is
a Hall subgroup of G/R by Claim (1) and Proposition 2.2.8 in [16]. Suppose that P R/R 6= 1. Then
P R/R ∈ Sylp (G/R). If q 6= p, then P ∈ Sylp (G). This contradicts the fact that P < Gp . Hence
q = p, so R ≤ P and therefiore P/R ∈ Sylp (G/R). It follows that P ∈ Sylp (G). This contradiction
shows that P R/R = 1, which implies that R = P is a Sylow p-subgroup of D. Therefore R is a
unique minimal normal subgroup of G contained in D. It is also clear that a p-complement of D is
a Hall subgroup of G.
Now we show that R Φ(G). Indeed, assume that R ≤ Φ(G). Then D 6= R by Lemma 2.3 since
D = GNσ . On the other hand, D/R is a p′ -group. Hence Op′ (D) 6= 1 by Lemma 2.3. But Op′ (D) is
characteristic in D and so it is normal G. Therefore G has a minimal normal subgroup L such that
L 6= R and L ≤ D. This contradiction shows that R Φ(G).
Let S be a maximal subgroup of G such that RS = G. Then |G : S| is a p-number. Hence, since
R is not a Sylow p-subgroup of G, p divides |S|. Then S is not a Hall subgroup of G and so S is not
a σ-Hall subgroup of G. Therefore S is σ-subnormal in G by Claim (3) and so G/SG is a σi -group,
which implies that
R ≤ D ≤ SG ≤ S
and so G = RS = S. This contradiction completes the proof of (4).
(5) If M ≤ E < G, then E is not σ-permutable in G and so E a σ-Hall subgroup of G.
Assume that E is σ-permutable in G. Then E is σ-subnormal in G by Lemma 2.2(4). Then there
is a subgroup chain
E = E0 ≤ E1 ≤ · · · ≤ Er = G
such that either Ei−1 is normal in Ei or Ei /(Ei−1 )Ei is σ-primary for all i = 1, . . . , r. Let V = Er−1 .
We can assume without loss of generality that V 6= G. Therefore, since G is σ-soluble by Claim (2),
for some σ-primary chief factor G/W of G we have E ≤ V ≤ W . Also we have D ≤ W and so
G = DE ≤ W , a contradiction. Hence E is not σ-permutable in G.
By hypothesis, G has a σ-permutable subgroup S such that E is a σ-Hall subgroup of S. But
then S = G, by the above argument, so E is a σ-Hall subgroup of G. In particular, M is a σ-Hall
subgroup of G and so D is a σ-Hall subgroup of G.
(6) D is soluble, |σ(D)| = |π(D)| and M acts irreducibly on every M -invariant Sylow subgroup
of D.
Let p ∈ σi ∈ σ(D). Lemma 2.6 and Claims (2) and (4) imply that for some Sylow p-subgroup P of
G we have P M = M P . Moreover, M P is a σ-Hall subgroup of G by Claim (5). Hence |σi ∩π(G)| = 1
for all i such that σi ∩ π(D) 6= ∅ and so |σ(D)| = |π(D)|. Therefore, since D is soluble by Claim (2),
M acts irreducibly on every M -invariant Sylow subgroup of D by Claim (5).
(7) M is a σ-Carter subgroup of G.
Let R be a minimal normal subgroup of G contained in D and E a subgroup of G containing M .
11
We need to show that E = E Nσ M . Claim (1) implies that RM/R is a σ-Carter subgroup of G/R,
so
ER/R = (ER/R)Nσ (RM/R).
Hence ER = E Nσ M R since
(ER/R)Nσ = E Nσ R/R.
Claim (6) implies that R is a p-group for some prime p. Claims (4), (5) and (6) imply that R, E and
E Nσ M are σ-Hall subgroups of G. Therefore, if R E, then E and E Nσ M are Hall p′ -subgroups of
ER = E Nσ M R, so E = E Nσ M . Finally, assume that R ≤ E but R E Nσ M . Then R ∩ E Nσ = 1.
On the other hand, since
DE/D ≃ E/D ∩ E
is σ-nilpotent, E Nσ ≤ D and so M ∩ E Nσ = 1. Therefore
E Nσ ∩ RM = (E Nσ ∩ R)(E Nσ ∩ M ) = 1.
Then
E/E Nσ = E Nσ M R/E Nσ ≃ M R
is σ-nilpotent. Hence M ≤ CG (R). Suppose that CG (R) < G and let CG (R) ≤ W < G, where
G/W is a chief factor of G. Claim (2) implies that G/W is σ-primary, so D ≤ W . But then
G = DM ≤ W < G, a contradiction. Therefore CG (R) = G, that is, R ≤ Z(G). Let V be a
complement to R in D. Then V is a Hall normal subgroup of D, so it is characteristic in D. Hence
V is normal in G and G/V ≃ RM is σ-nilpotent, so D ≤ V < D. This contradiction completes the
proof of (7).
(8) D possesses a Sylow tower.
Let R be a minimal normal subgroup of G contained in D. Then R is a p-group for some prime
p by Claim (6). Moreover, the Frattini argument implies that for some Sylow p-subgroup P of D we
have M ≤ NG (P ) and so R = P since M acts irreducible on P by Claim (6). On the other hand, by
Claim (1), D/R possesses a Sylow tower. Hence we have (8).
(9) Every chief factor of G below D is σ-eccentric.
Let H/K be a chief factor of G below D. Then H/K is a p-group for some prime p since D is
soluble by Claim (6). By the Fratiini argument, there exist a Sylow p-subgroup P and a p-complement
E of D such that M ≤ NG (P ) and M ≤ NG (E). Then M ≤ NG (P ∩ K) and M ≤ NG (P ∩ H).
Hence P ∩ K = 1 and P ∩ H = P by Claim (6), so H = K ⋊ P . Let V = EM . Then K ≤ V and
HV = G, so V is a maximal subgroup of G. Hence
G/VG ≃ (H/K) ⋊ (G/CG (H/K))
by Lemma 2.9. Therefore, if H/K is σ-central in G, then D ≤ VG , which is impossible since evidently
p does not divide |V |. Thus we have (9).
12
From Claims (4)–(9) it follows that G is a HσE-group, contrary to our assumption on G = V .
Hence (i) ⇒ (ii).
(ii) ⇒ (iii) This implication is evident.
(iii) ⇒ (i) By hypothesis, G = D⋊M , where D = GNσ is a σ-Hall subgroup of G, |σ(D)| = |π(D)|
and M acts irreducibly on every M -invariant Sylow subgroup of D.
(*) Every subgroup A of G containing M is a σ-Hall subgroup of G.
Let D0 = D ∩ A. Then A = D0 ⋊ M and D0 6= 1. Let p ∈ π(D0 ). The Frattini argument and
Lemma 2.6 imply that for some Sylow p-subgroup P0 of D0 and some Sylow p-subgroup P of D we
have M ≤ NG (P0 ), M ≤ NG (P ) and P0 M ≤ P M . Hence, since M acts irreducibly on every M invariant Sylow subgroup of D, P0 = P . Therefore every Sylow subgroup of A is a Sylow subgroup
of G. Hence A is a σ-Hall subgroup of G since |σ(D)| = |π(D)| and M is a σ-Hall subgroup of G.
Now, let A be a subgroup of G. First assume that DA < G. By Lemma 2.1(6), DA is σsubnormal in G. Therefore every σ-subnormal subgroup of DA is also σ-subnormal in G. Hence
Condition (iii) holds for DA, so A is Hσ -subnormally embedded in DA by induction. But then A is
Hσ -subnormally embedded in G by Lemma 2.1(7).
Finally, suppose that DA = G. Then, since G is σ-soluble, for some x we have M ≤ Ax
by Lemma 2.6. Hence Ax is a σ-Hall subgroup of G by Claim (*), so Ax is an Hσ -subnormally
embedded subgroup of G. But then A is an Hσ -subnormally embedded subgroup of G. Therefore
the implication (iii) ⇒ (i) is true.
The theorem is proved.
Proof of Theorem 1.9. (i) ⇒ (ii) This follows from Lemma 2.2(4) and Theorems 1.3 and 1.4.
(ii) ⇒ (iii) This implication is evident.
(iii) ⇒ (i) Let A be any subgroup of G. Then DA is σ-permutable in G by Lemma 2.2(3) since
G is σ-soluble. On the other hand, since |σ(D)| = |π(D)| and D is a cyclic σ-Hall subgroup of G
of square-free order, A is a σ-Hall subgroup of DA. Hence A is Hσ -permutably embedded in G.
Therefore the implication (iii) ⇒ (i) is true.
The theorem is proved.
Proof of Theorem 1.7.
(i) ⇒ (ii) In view of Theorem 1.9, it is enough to show that if
D ≤ L ≤ G and L is a σ-Hall subgroup of some normal subgroup V of G, then L is normal in G.
But since G/D is σ-nilpotent, L/D is σ-subnormal in G/D, so L is σ-subnormal in G by Lemma
2.1(6). Hence L is σ-subnormal in V by Lemma 2.1(1). But then L is a normal in V by Lemma
2.1(4) and so L is a characteristic subgroup of V . It follows that L is normal in G.
(ii) ⇒ (iii) This implication is evident.
(iii) ⇒ (i) See the proof of the implication (iii) ⇒ (i) in Theorem 1.9.
The theorem is proved.
13
References
[1] A. N. Skiba, On σ-subnormal and σ-permutable subgroups of finite groups, J. Algebra, 436
(2015), 1–16.
[2] A. N. Skiba, A generalization of a Hall theorem, J. Algebra and its Application, 436 (2015),
1–16.
[3] A.N. Skiba, On some results in the theory of finite partially soluble groups, Commun. Math.
Stat., 4(3) (2016), 281–309.
[4] A. Ballester-Bolinches, R. Esteban-Romero, M. Asaad, Products of Finite Groups, Berlin-New
York, Walter de Gruyter, 2010.
[5] W. Guo, Structure Theory for Canonical Classes of Finite Groups, Springer, Heidelberg-New
York-Dordrecht-London, 2015.
[6] S. Li, J. He, G. Nong, L. Zhou, On Hall normally embedded subgroups of finite groups, Comm.
Algebra, 37 (2009), 3360–3367.
[7] J. Lio, S. Li, CLT −groups with Hall S-quasinormally embedded subgroups, Ukrain. Math.
Journal, 66 (2014), 1281–1287.
[8] S. Li, J. Liu, On Hall subnormally embedded and generalized nilpotent groups, J. Algebra, 388
(2013), 1–9.
[9] W. Guo, A. N. Skiba, Finite groups with permutable complete Wielandt sets of subgroups, J.
Group Theory, 18 (2015), 191–200.
[10] B. Huppert, Endliche Gruppen I, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, 1967.
[11] A. Ballester-Bolinches, Shou Homg Qiao, On a problem posed by S. Li and J. Liu, Arch. Math.,
102 (2014), 109–111.
[12] W. Guo, K. P. Shum, A. N. Skiba, X-semipermutable subgroups of finite groups, J. Algebra,
315 (2007), 31–41.
[13] K. Doerk, T. Hawkes, Finite Soluble Groups, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin-New York, 1992.
[14] L. A. Shemetkov, A. N. Skiba, Formations of Algebraic Systems, Nauka, Main Editorial Board
for Physical and Mathematical Literature, Moscow, 1989.
[15] W. Guo, The Theory of Classes of Groups, Science Press-Kluwer Academic Publishers, Beijing,
New York, Dordrecht, Boston, London, 2000.
[16] A. Ballester-Bolinches, L.M. Ezquerro, Classes of Finite groups, Springer, Dordrecht, 2006.
14
[17] L. A. Shemetkov, Formations of finite groupsNauka, Main Editorial Board for Physical and
Mathematical Literature, Moscow, 1989.
15
| 4math.GR
|
Information-theoretic bounds and phase transitions in clustering,
sparse PCA, and submatrix localization
arXiv:1607.05222v2 [math.ST] 23 Jan 2017
Jess Banks
Cristopher Moore
Roman Vershynin
Jiaming Xu ∗
Nicolas Verzelen
January 24, 2017
Abstract
We study the problem of detecting a structured, low-rank signal matrix corrupted with additive
Gaussian noise. This includes clustering in a Gaussian mixture model, sparse PCA, and submatrix
localization. Each of these problems is conjectured to exhibit a sharp information-theoretic threshold,
below which the signal is too weak for any algorithm to detect. We derive upper and lower bounds
on these thresholds by applying the first and second moment methods to the likelihood ratio between
these “planted models” and null models where the signal matrix is zero. For sparse PCA and submatrix
localization, we determine this threshold exactly in the limit where the number of blocks is√large or the
signal matrix is very sparse; for the clustering problem, our bounds differ by a factor of 2 when the
number of clusters is large. Moreover, our upper bounds show that for each of these problems there
is a significant regime where reliable detection is information-theoretically possible but where known
algorithms such as PCA fail completely, since the spectrum of the observed matrix is uninformative.
This regime is analogous to the conjectured ‘hard but detectable’ regime for community detection in
sparse graphs.
Keywords: First and second moment methods, clustering, information-theoretic bounds, sparse PCA, submatrix
localization
1
Introduction
Many problems in machine learning, signal processing, and statistical inference have a common, unifying
goal: reconstruct a low-rank signal matrix observed through a noisy channel. This framework can encompass
a wide range of tasks as we vary the channel and low-rank signal, but we focus here on the case where the
noise is additive and Gaussian, and the signal is relatively weak in comparison to the noise. To be precise,
suppose we are given an m × n data matrix
X =M +W
snr
with M = √ U V † ,
n
(1)
where snr is a fixed parameter characterizing the signal-to-noise ratio, U ∈ Rm×k and V ∈ Rn×k are generated
from some known prior distribution independent of n, and W ∈ Rm×n is a noise matrix whose entries are
independent Gaussians with unit variance. We will refer to this as the planted model : it consists of a noisy
∗ J.
Banks is with the Department of Mathematics, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA,
[email protected]. C. Moore is with the Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM, [email protected]. R. Vershynin is with the Department of Mathematics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, [email protected]. N. Verzelen
is with UMR 729 MISTEA, INRA, Montpellier. J. Xu is with the Krannert School of Management, Purdue University,
West Lafayette, IN 47907, [email protected]. This work was in part presented at the 54th Annual Allerton Conference on
Communication, Control, and Computing, September 27-30, 2016, Monticello, IL, USA.
1
observation X of a signal matrix M of rank k, and may possess additional structure through the priors on
U and V .
Given the observed matrix X, the problem of interest is to reconstruct M , or at least detect that it exists.
For simplicity, we will work in the Bayes-optimal case where model parameters such as the true rank and
signal-to-noise ratio are known to the estimators. In the low signal-to-noise ratio regime we consider, exact
reconstruction of M is fundamentally impossible (see §2 for more details). Instead, we focus on the following
two tasks: first, detecting that the signal M exists, i.e., telling with high probability whether X was indeed
generated by the planted model as opposed to a null model where M = 0 and X consists only of noise; and
second, reconstructing M to some accuracy better than chance. We define these tasks formally as follows.
Definition 1 (Detection). Let P(X) be the distribution of X in the planted model (1), and denote by Q(X)
the distribution of X in the null model where X = W . A test statistic T (X) with a threshold achieves
detection if limn→∞ [P(T (X) < ) + Q(T (X) ≥ τ )] = 0, so that the criterion T (X) ≥ determines with high
probability whether X is drawn from P or Q.
c=M
c(X) achieves reconstruction if EX kM
ck2 = O(n) and
Definition 2 (Reconstruction). An estimator M
F
ci ≥ , where hA, Bi = Tr A† B denotes the
there exists a constant > 0 such that limn→∞ (1/n)EM,X hM, M
matrix inner product and kAk2F = hA, Ai.
For many natural problems in this class, it is believed that there is a phase transition, i.e., a threshold value
of snr below which both tasks are information-theoretically impossible: no test statistic can distinguish the
c = 0. This threshold is known as the
null and planted models, and no estimator can beat the trivial one M
information-theoretic threshold and it also depends on the structure of the problem, i.e., on the priors of U
and V ; if this prior is more strongly structured, we expect the threshold to be lower.
We focus on three cases of (1) which arise in many applications. In Sparse PCA, k = 1 and U = V = v
for some vector v. We further assume that v is sparse, with a constant fraction of nonzero entries. This
corresponds to the sparse, spiked Wigner model of [20, 38]. In Submatrix Localization (also known as
submatrix detection and noisy clustering), U = V and M contains k ≥ 2 distinct blocks of elevated mean.
This model arises in the analysis of social networks and gene expression, see e.g. [31, 15, 24]; it can also
be thought of as a Gaussian version of the stochastic block model [19, 18]. Finally, in Gaussian Mixture
Clustering, there are k ≥ 2 clusters, and each row of M is the center of the cluster to which the corresponding
data point belongs. This model has been widely studied, see, e.g., [47, 46, 30, 29, 2].
For each of these three problems, our goal is to compute the information-theoretic threshold, and understand how it scales with the parameters of the problem: for instance, the sparsity of the underlying signal or
the number of clusters. In particular, a simple upper bound on the information-theoretic threshold for each of
these problems is the point at which spectral algorithms succeed, i.e., the point at which the likely spectrum
of X becomes distinguishable from the spectrum of the random matrix W . The spectral thresholds for our
problems are well known from the theory of Gaussian matrices with low-rank perturbations. However, based
on compelling but non-rigorous arguments from statistical physics (e.g. [37, 36]), it has been conjectured
that when the signal is sufficiently sparse, or its rank (the number of clusters or blocks) is sufficiently large,
the information-theoretic threshold falls strictly below the spectral one.
In this paper, we prove upper and lower bounds on information-theoretic thresholds of all three problems,
determining the threshold within a multiplicative constant in interesting regimes. For sparse PCA, we
determine the precise threshold in the limit where the signal matrix is very sparse; similarly, for the submatrix
localization problem, we determine the threshold
when the number of blocks is large. For the clustering
√
problem, our bounds differ by a factor of 2 in the limit where the number of clusters is large. Moreover,
our results verify the conjecture that the information-theoretic threshold dips below the spectral one when the
signal is sufficiently sparse, or when the number of clusters or blocks is sufficiently large. This corresponds to
recent results [1, 9, 17, 23] showing that, in the stochastic block model, the information-theoretic detectability
threshold falls below the Kesten-Stigum bound above which efficient spectral and message-passing algorithms
succeed [19, 18, 39, 33, 14]. We consider this evidence for the conjecture that these problems posses a ‘hard
but detectable’ regime where detection and reconstruction are information-theoretically possible but take at
least exponential time. Although our computations are specific to these models, our proof techniques are
2
quite general and may be applied with mild adjustment to a broad range of similar problems. We present
our results in §2, an overview of our proof techniques in §3, and full proofs in in §4.
Since the initial posting of this paper as an arXiv preprint, a number of interesting papers [44, 43, 35] have
appeared, some extending or improving our results. Sharp lower bounds for sparse PCA were also obtained
recently in [43] using a conditional second moment method similar to ours. Complete, but not explicit,
characterizations of information-theoretic reconstruction thresholds were obtained in [34, 35] for sparse PCA
and submatrix localization through the Guerra interpolation technique and cavity method. However, their
characterization of reconstruction thresholds does not directly apply to detection.
2
Models and results
2.1
Sparse PCA
Consider the following spiked Wigner model, where the underlying signal is a rank-one matrix:
λ
X = √ vv † + W ,
n
(2)
i.i.d.
Here, v ∈ Rn , λ > 0 and W ∈ Rn×n is a Wigner random matrix with Wii ∼ N (0, 2) and Wij =
i.i.d.
Wij ∼ N (0, 1) for i < j. We assume v is drawn from the sparse Rademacher prior, although many alternatives
may be imposed. Specifically, for some γ ∈ [0, 1] the support of v is drawn uniformly from all
n
subsets
S ⊂ [n] with |S| = γn (when n is finite, we assume that γn is an integer). Once the support is
γn
chosen, each nonzero component vi is drawn independently and uniformly from {±γ −1/2 }, so that kvk22 = n.
When γ is small, the data matrix X is a sparse, rank-one matrix observed through Gaussian noise.
One natural approach for this problem is PCA: that is, diagonalize X and use its leading eigenvector vb
as an estimate of v. The threshold at which this algorithm succeeds can be computed using the theory of
random matrices with rank-one perturbations [8, 42, 11]:
√
(1) When λ > 1, the leading eigenvalue of X/ n converges almost surely to λ + λ−1 , and hv, vbi2 converges
almost surely to 1 − λ−2 ; thus PCA succeeds
√ in reconstructing better than chance;
(2) When λ ≤ 1, the leading eigenvalue of X/ n converges almost surely to 2, and hv, vbi2 converges almost
surely to 0; thus PCA fails to reconstruct better than chance.
Because the leading eigenvalue of W is 2 w.h.p., detection is only possible when λ > 1. Intuitively, PCA
only exploits the low-rank structure of the underlying signal, and not the sparsity of v; it is natural to ask
whether one can succeed in detection or reconstruction for some λ < 1 by taking advantage of this additional
structure. Through analysis of an approximate message-passing algorithm and the free energy, the following
conjecture was made in statistical physics [38, 34]:
Conjecture 1. Let the computational threshold be the minimum of λ so that reconstruction or detection can
be attained in polynomial-time in n for a given γ. There exists γ ∗ ∈ (0, 1) such that
(1) If γ ≥ γ ∗ , then both the information-theoretic and computational thresholds are given by λ = 1.
(2) If γ < γ ∗ , then the computational threshold is given by λ = 1, but the information-theoretic threshold
for λ is strictly smaller.
We derive the following upper and lower bounds on the information-theoretic threshold in terms of λ and γ,
and confirm that the threshold is λ = 1 when γ is relatively large and falls strictly below λ = 1 when γ is
sufficiently small. Throughout, we use
h(γ) = −γ log γ − (1 − γ) log(1 − γ)
to denote the entropy function, and W(y) for the root x of xex = y. All our logarithms are natural.
3
Theorem 1. Let
p
λupper = 2 h(γ) + γ log 2
1
r
1√
2γ
W
lower
2γ e
λ
=
r
√
4γ − log γ − 2.1 −2 log γ −
(3)
γ ≥ 0.6
e−41 /81 ≤ γ < 0.6
3
2
log
3e
1−γ
(4)
γ < e−41 /81 .
Then detection and reconstruction are information-theoretically possible when λ > λupper and are impossible
when λ < λlower .
In our proof, we give tighter lower bounds, but these are analytically convenient.
Note that λupper falls below the spectral threshold λ = 1 whenever γ ≤ 0.054, and λlower matches
the spectral threshold whenever γ ≥ 0.6. Hence, Theorem 1 proves Conjecture 1 on information-theoretic
threshold, albeit without pinning down γ ∗ exactly. In addition, in the limit γ → 0, both λupper and λlower
give an information-theoretic threshold of
p
(5)
λc = 2 (1 + oγ (1)) −γ log γ ,
determining the threshold fully in the limit where the low-rank matrix is very sparse. Independent of the
present work, and building on our preprint [10], Perry et al. [43] obtained the same tight threshold
√ in this
limit with a smaller error term. Previous work [16] had determined that threshold scales as λ = Θ( −γ log γ)
up to a constant factor.
In passing, we note that there is a very interesting line of work on exact or approximate support reconstruction for sparse PCA, i.e., estimating correctly or consistently the positions of non-zeros in v, in a regime
where the size of the support is sublinear in n (see e.g., [28, 5, 12, 32, 21] and references therein)1 . In an
influential paper [28], it was shown that while the estimate via the classical PCA is inconsistent, a simple
diagonal thresholding procedure consistently estimates v provided that v is sufficiently sparse. Assuming
λ = Θ(1), it is later proved in [5] that diagonal thresholding exactly recovers the support of v with high
probability if γ . 1/(n log n), and the information-theoretic threshold for exact support recovery is given by
γ 1/ log n up to a constant factor. In contrast, we focus on the regime where the size of the support is
linear in n, i.e., γ = Θ(1), and λ = Θ(1). In this regime it is impossible to correctly or consistently estimate
the support of v, and hence we instead focus on detection and reconstruction better than chance.
2.2
Submatrix Localization
In the submatrix localization problem, our task is to detect within a large Gaussian matrix a small block
or blocks with atypical mean. Let σ : [n] → [k] be a balanced partition, i.e. one for which |σ −1 (t)| = n/k
for all t ∈ [k], chosen uniformly from all such partitions. This terminology will recur throught the paper.
Construct a n × n matrix Y such that Yi,j = 1σ(i)=σ(j) . In the planted model,
µ
1
X=√
(6)
Y − J +W ,
k
n
where W is again a Wigner matrix and J is the all-ones matrix. In the null model, X = W . The subtraction
of J/k
model,
√ centers the signal matrix so that EX = 0 in both the null and planted models. In the planted
√
(µ/ n) (Y − J/k) is a rank-(k − 1) matrix with the largest (k − 1) eigenvalues all equal to µ n/k, making
X a Wigner matrix with a rank-(k − 1) additive perturbation. Matrices of this type exhibit the following
spectral phase transition:
√
be precise, those references mostly study the spiked Wishart model: X = (λ/ n)uv > + W , where u ∈ Rm with i.i.d.
N (0, 1) entries and W is a m × n Gaussian matrix with i.i.d. N (0, 1) entries; the results can be readily extended to the spiked
Wigner model.
1 To
4
√
(1) When µ > k, the k leading eigenvalues of X/√n converge to µ/k + k/µ almost surely;
(2) When µ ≤ k, the k leading eigenvalues of X/ n converge to 2 almost surely.
Hence, it is possible to detect the presence of the additive perturbation from the spectrum of X alone when
µ > k. We prove the following upper and lower bounds on the information-theoretic threshold:
Theorem 2. Let
r
upper
µ
µlower
log k
= 2k
k−1
2
q
2 log(k−1)
= k
k−1
q
2 k log k − 11k log3/4 (k)
(7)
k=2
3 ≤ k ≤ exp(224 )
(8)
4
k > exp(22 ) .
Then detection and reconstruction are information-theoretically possible when µ > µupper and impossible
when µ < µlower .
Note that µupper dips below the spectral threshold µ = k when k ≥ 11, indicating a regime where
standard spectral methods fail but detection is information-theoretically possible. Also, Theorem
2 proves
√
the conjecture in [37] that as k → ∞, the information-theoretic threshold is given by µ = 2 k log k.
Previous work in submatrix detection and localization, also known as noisy biclustering, mostly focuses on
finding a single submatrix, see, e.g., [31, 15, 24] and the references therein. Notably, √
[17] considers a general
setting where the number of blocks k could grow with n, and proves that if µ ≥ c k log n for some large
constant c, then it is informationally
possible to exactly reconstruct the support of the planted submatrices
√
with high probability; if µ ≤ c0 k log n, then exact support reconstruction is informationally impossible. In
our setting, µ = Θ(1) and k = Θ(1), so it is impossible to consistently estimate the support and we instead
resort to detection and reconstruction better than the chance.
2.3
Gaussian Mixture Clustering
Finally, we study a model of clustering with limited data in high dimension.
P Let v1 , ..., vk be independently
and identically distributed as N (0, k/(k − 1) In,n ) , and define v = (1/k) s vs to be their mean. The scaling
of the expected norm of each vs with k ensures that Ekvs − vk22 = n for all 1 ≤ s ≤ k. For a fixed parameter
α > 0, we then generate m = αn points xi ∈ Rn which are partitioned into k clusters of equal size by
a balanced partition σ : [n] → [k], again chosen uniformly at random from all such partitions. For each
data point i, let σi ∈ [k]
p denote its cluster index, and generate xi independently according to Gaussian
distribution with mean ρ/n (vσi − v) and identity covariance matrix, where ρ > 0 is a fixed parameter
characterizing the cluster separation. We can put this in the form of model (1) by constructing an n × k
matrix V = [v1 , ..., vk ], an m × k matrix S with Si,t = 1σi =t , and setting
r
ρ
1
X=
S − Jm,k V † + W,
(9)
n
k
i.i.d.
where Wi,j ∼ N (0, 1). In the null model, there is no cluster structure and X = W . The subtraction of
Jm,k /k once again centers the signal matrix so that EX = 0 in both models. The following spectral phase
transition follows from the celebrated BBP phase transition [8, 41]:
√
ρ
(1) When ρ α > k − 1, then the largest eigenvalue of (1/m)X † X converges to (1 + k−1
)(1 + k−1
ρα ) almost
surely; √
√
(2) When ρ α ≤ k − 1, then the largest eigenvalue of (1/m)X † X converges to (1 + 1/ α)2 almost surely.
√
Thus spectral detection is possible if ρ α > (k − 1).
We prove
√ the following upper and lower bounds on the information-theoretic threshold, which differ by
a factor of 2 when k is large.
5
Theorem 3. Let
r
ρ
upper
ρlower
k log k
=2
+ 2 log k
α
(p
1/α
k=2
= q 2(k−1) log(k−1)
k ≥ 3.
α
(10)
(11)
Then detection and reconstruction are possible when ρ > ρupper and impossible when ρ < ρlower .
p
We conjecture that in the limit k → ∞, the information-theoretic threshold is ρ = 2 k log k/α, but we
do not find a proof.
Most previous work in Gaussian mixture clustering focuses exact or near-exact reconstruction, see e.g., [46,
30]. As in the §2.1, a popular approach is PCA, which identifies the clusters based on the first k principal
components of the data matrix. It is shown in [47] that PCA allows identification of clusters with a cluster
√
separation ρ = Ω(k 1/4 log n) and a sample of size m = Ω(d3 log d). This technique was extended√to non√
Gaussian distributions [29, 2], and for Gaussian, the cluster separation is improved to be ρ = Ω( k log n)
and the sample complexity reduced to m = Ω(k 2 d) in [2]. In our setting, since ρ is a fixed constant, the
cluster separation is not sufficient for exact reconstruction and we turn to detection and reconstruction
better than chance. Somewhat surprisingly, we find that if the number of clusters is large, clustering is
informationally possible even when below the spectral phase transition threshold, and we conjecture that in
this regime it is computationally hard to identify the clusters. We note that a similar “hard-but-detectable”
regime has been determined empirically in [46].
3
Proof techniques
This section gives a brief overview of our proof techniques; the full proof will be presented in the next section.
3.1
The likelihood ratio and hypothesis testing
Detection is a classic hypothesis testing problem. Given a test statistic T (X), we consider its distribution
under the planted and null models. If these two distributions are asymptotically disjoint, i.e., their total
variation distance tends to 1 in the limit of large datasets, then it is information-theoretically possible to
distinguish the two models with high probability by measuring T (X). A classic choice of statistic for binary
hypothesis testing is the likelihood ratio,
P
P
P(X|M ) P(M )
P(X)
M P(X, M )
=
= M
.
Q(X)
Q(X)
Q(X)
This object will figure heavily in both our upper and lower bounds. By the Neyman-Pearson lemma [27], the
likelihood ratio is the most powerful test statistic of a given significance level; that is, if we set the threshold
at the point such that Q(T (X) < ) = α for any fixed α, it maximizes P(T (X) ≥ ).
Our upper bounds do not use the likelihood ratio directly, since it is hard to furnish lower bounds on the
typical value of P(X)/Q(X) when X is drawn from P. Instead, we use the generalized likelihood ratio,
max
M
P(X|M )
.
Q(X)
In the planted model where the true underlying signal matrix is M0 , this quantity is trivially bounded below
by P(X|M0 )/Q(X). We will use simple first moment arguments to show that, with high probability in
the null model Q, this lower bound is not achieved by any M . An easy extension of this argument shows
c = argmaxM P(X|M ) has nonzero
that, in the planted model, the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) M
correlation with M0 . Thus we can output a good estimate of M0 by exhaustive search.
6
The conditional likelihood ratio has a particularly elegant form when the noise is additive and Gaussian.
It is first useful to write down the probability distribution of a Wigner random matrix in the space of
symmetric matrices (also known as the Gaussian Orthogonal Ensemble) as
Q(W ) =
1 − 1 kW k2F
e 4
Zn
(12)
where Zn is a normalization constant depending only on n. Similarly, if W is a Gaussian random matrix
whose entries are independently distribution as N (0, 1), then
Q(W ) =
1 − 1 kW k2F
e 2
.
Zn0
(13)
Thus, for Wigner noise the conditional likelihood ratio is
2
2
2
1
1
1
P(X|M )
Q(X − M )
=
= e 4 (kXkF −kX−M kF ) = e 2 hX,M i− 4 kM kF
Q(X)
Q(X)
(14)
and identical for Gaussian noise except for a factor of two in the exponent.
The conditional log likelihood is a weighted sum of the entries of X, and is therefore itself Gaussian. Our
first moment bounds now proceed as follows. In the planted model, when X = M0 + W , the conditional log
2
likelihood of the planted signal M0 is 21 hW, M0 i + 41 kM0 kF . We can use standard Gaussian concentration
2
results to bound the typical deviation of this quantity around its mean of 41 kM0 kF . On the other hand, in
2
the null model where X = W , the conditional log likelihood of any M is 21 hW, M i − 14 kM kF , and we can
combine Gaussian concentration bounds with a union bound over all possible M to compute when, with
high probability in the null model, no M will beat the conditional log likelihood of the planted signal M0 .
As above, this argument can be nominally modified to show that the MLE estimate is positively correlated
with M0 . This technique must be altered slightly for the case of Gaussian Mixture Clustering, since M ∝ SV †
and V is chosen from a continuous prior. We could take a union bound over V by suitably discretizing; instead
we use the fact that for any S we can analytically maximize the conditional likelihood of SV † with respect
to V by setting the ith cluster center to be the empirical center of the data points assigned to cluster i by
S. This alters the distribution of the likelihood ratio, but we proceed analogously to above with the proper
concentration results.
3.2
Second moment bounds and contiguity
Intuitively, if the planted model P and the null model Q have asymptotically disjoint support, then the
likelihood ratio P/Q is almost always either very large or very small. In particular, its variance in Q must
diverge. This suggests that we can derive lower bounds on the threshold by bounding its second moment in
Q, or equivalently its expectation in P. Suppose the second moment is bounded by some constant C, i.e.,
"
2 #
Z
P(X)
P(X)
P(X)2
EX∼Q
= EX∼P
=
dX
≤C.
(15)
Q(X)
Q(X)
Q(X)
X
This implies a bound on the Kullback-Leibler divergence between P and Q, since Jensen’s inequality gives
DKL (PkQ) = EX∼P log
P(X)
P(X)
≤ log EX∼P
≤ log C = O(1) .
Q(X)
Q(X)
(16)
Moreover, it also implies that detection is impossible. To see this, consider the following definition:
Definition 3. Let P = (Pn ), Q = (Qn ) be sequences of distributions defined on the same sequence of spaces
Ωn . We write P E Q, and say that P is contiguous to Q, if for any sequence of events E = (En ) such that
Q(E) → 0, we also have P(E) → 0.
7
If P E Q then detection is impossible, since no algorithm can return “yes” with high probability (or even
positive probability) in the planted model, and “no” with high probability in the null model.
The following simple argument shows that (15) implies P E Q and hence non-detectability. Let E be
a sequence of events such that Q(E) → 0, and let 1E denote the indicator random variable for E. Then
Cauchy-Schwarz gives
s
2
p
P(X)
P(X)
× EX∼Q 12E ≤ CQ(E) → 0 .
1E ≤ EX∼Q
(17)
P(E) = EX∼P 1E = EX∼Q
Q(X)
Q(X)
We note that showing that Q E P often requires additional arguments such as the small subgraph conditioning
method [40, 9].
The following lemma gives a general expression for the second moment of the likelihood ratio whenever
the model consists of a symmetric signal matrix with Wigner noise or an asymmetric signal matrix with
Gaussian noise.
Lemma 1. Let P(X) and Q(X) be the planted and null models X = M + W and X = W respectively, where
M is drawn from some prior over symmetric matrices and W is a Wigner matrix. Then
EX∼Q
P(X)
Q(X)
2
0
1
= EM,M 0 e 2 hM,M i ,
where M and M 0 are drawn independently from the prior. Similarly, if M is drawn from some prior over
asymmetric matrices and W is a Gaussian random matrix,
EX∼Q
P(X)
Q(X)
2
0
= EM,M 0 ehM,M i .
Thus the second moment method boils down to calculating an exponential moment of the correlation
between two independent draws from the prior P(M ). Depending on P(M ), these draws can correlate
in complicated ways, and the remainder of our second moment computations consist of combinatorially
analyzing the various events in P(M ) that give rise to these correlations.
3.3
Conditional second moment method
Sometimes, rare events can cause the second moment to explode even when two models are truly contiguous.
We circumvent this by computing the second moment conditioned on a sequence of high-probability events
F which rule out the catastrophic rare ones.
In the planted model, these events can occur both in the prior distribution of the planted signal, and in
the additive Gaussian noise of the channel. To address atypical events in the prior, we will condition on some
high probability property of the signal M , choosing an appropriate event {M ∈ F } such that P(F ) = 1+o(1),
and form the corresponding conditional distribution
P0 (X) =
EM [P(X|M )1F ]
.
P(F )
(18)
The case where the problematic events occur in the noise distribution is similar; we define an event {X −M ∈
FM } such that P(FM |M ) = 1 + o(1) uniformly over M , and the corresponding conditional distribution
P0 (X) = EM [P0 (X|M )],
where
P0 (X|M ) =
P(X|M )1FM
.
P(FM |M )
(19)
In both cases, it is straightforward to show that P E P0 , and therefore that if the conditional second moment
2
EX∼Q (P0 (X)/Q(X)) is bounded, then P E P0 E Q.
8
In the Gaussian mixture clustering problem, we use the first type of conditional second moment method
by conditioning on the typical value of cluster centers kV k2 . In the sparse PCA problem and the submatrix
localization
problem, we instead use the second type of conditional second moment method to close the factor
√
of 2 between the direct second moment lower bound and the first moment upper bound. A similar method
was used in [43] to derive the sharp constant of the detection lower bound in the sparse PCA problem.
Previous work [6, 49] used the conditional second moment method in deriving the sharp detection threshold
in community detection problem.
As a high-level motivation for this conditioning, let P(X) and Q(X) be the planted and null models
X = M + W and X = W respectively, where M is drawn from some prior over symmetric matrices and W
is a Wigner matrix. Using Fubini’s theorem,
EX∼Q
P(X)
Q(X)
2
P(X|M )P(X|M 0 )
Q2 (X)
h 1
i
2
0 2
0
1
1
= EM,M 0 EX∼Q e− 4 kM kF − 4 kM kF + 2 hX,M +M i
= EM,M 0
1
= EM,M 0 e 2 hM,M
0
i
where M and M 0 are drawn independently from the prior, and in the last line we have carried out the
the integration with respect to X ∼ Q directly. The reader may refer to the proof of Lemma 1 for the
intervening lines. However, it is possible to decrease the second moment by conditioning on the typical value
of hX, M + M 0 i in the planted model.
Specifically, suppose that P hX, M i ≈ kM k2F | M = 1 + o(1) uniformly over M . Then, by letting
FM = {hX, M i ≈ kM k2F }, we get that
EX∼Q
P0 (X)
Q(X)
2
1
1
1
2
0 2
0
≈E
EX∼Q exp − kM kF − kM kF + hX, M + M i 1{FM } 1{FM 0 }
4
4
2
1
1
1
≈ EM,M 0 EX∼Q exp − kM k2F − kM 0 k2F + hX, M + M 0 i 1{hX,M +M 0 i≈kM k2 +kM 0 k2 }
F
F
4
4
2
!#
"
2
kM + M 0 k2F
kM k2F + kM 0 k2F
1
hM, M 0 i −
1−
≈ EM,M 0 exp
2
4
kM + M 0 k2F
+
2
0 2
kM
k
+
kM
k
1
F
F
= EM,M 0 exp hM, M 0 i
2
kM + M 0 k2F
where we used the fact that for Y ∼ N (0, σ 2 ), E eY 1{Y ≤b} ≤ exp 12 σ 2 − 12 σ 2 (1 − σb2 )2+ and 12 hX, M +
M 0 i ∼ N (0, kM + M 0 k2F /2). Comparing
this conditional second moment with the unconditional one, there
is a correction term kM k2F + kM 0 k2F /kM + M 0 k2F , which is most effective if M = M 0 . It will turn out
that in the sparse PCA problem, when the sparsity γ → 0 or in the submatrix localization problem, when
the number of blocks k → ∞, the second moment is dominated by the event that M = M 0 . Hence,
M,M 0
EX∼Q
P0 (X)
Q(X)
2
1
2
≈ exp kM kF PM,M 0 [M = M 0 ] ,
4
as opposed to exp 21 kM k2F PM,M 0 [M = M 0 ] in the absence of conditioning, a factor of two gain in the
exponent. Notice that there is one slight difference between this informal description and our proofs. Instead
of conditioning on the typical value of hX, M i ≈ kM k2F , we condition on the typical value of k(X − M )S k2 ,
where S = supp(M ) and XS denotes the matrix by setting entries of X outside of S to be zero. The reader
may refer to Section 4.2.3 and Section 4.3.3 for details.
9
3.4
Non-reconstructibility
Without further embellishment, contiguity is a statement about detection and not reconstruction. It is
tempting to believe that whenever contiguity holds—that is, whenever we cannot tell whether a particular
sample was generated from the null or planted model—we also cannot infer the planted signal M0 better
than chance. This is not the case. Consider a strange situation in which the null and planted models are
identical and noiseless: in P we observe X = M0 drawn from a prior P0 , and in Q we observe a random draw
M from P0 . Detection is patently impossible because these models are contiguous, but if we know that X is
drawn from the planted model, the reconstruction problem is trivial since we observe the ground truth M0
directly.
However, in the model described by (1) where the noise is additive and Gaussian, we can show that a
bounded KL divergence implies that reconstruction is impossible as well. If M is the planted signal, the
c is EkM − M
ck2 . The following theorem shows that whenever the
mean squared error of an estimator M
F
c
KL divergence DKL (PkQ) = o(n), the estimator M that minimizes the mean squared error tends to the
c = 0. By (16) a bounded second moment (15) implies a bounded KL divergence; hence
trivial estimator M
a bounded second moment also implies non-reconstruction.
Theorem 4. Let P(X) and Q(X) be the planted and null models X = M + W and X = W respectively,
where M is drawn from some prior such that E[M ] = 0 and limn→∞ (1/n)E[kM k2F ] exists, and where W
is a Gaussian or Wigner matrix. The MMSE estimator in the planted model is the mean of the posterior
b
distribution: E(X)
= E[M |X]. If the KL divergence DKL (PkQ) = o(n), then
lim inf
n→∞
1
2
b
EX∼P kE(X)k
F = 0.
n
(20)
c=M
c(X) such that EX kM
ck2 = O(n), we have that
It further follows that for any estimator M
F
lim inf
n→∞
1
ci = 0.
EM,X hM, M
n
(21)
√
When M = (snr/ n) U V † , where the rows of U and V are independently and identically distributed according to some priors, then the liminf in (20) and (21) can be replaced by lim.
In cases where we use the conditional second moment method by conditioning on events F that depend
only on the signal M , i.e., F = {M ∈ F }, the conditional distribution P0 given in (18) is still an additive
Gaussian model. Hence, we can still apply Theorem 4 with P0 and Q, concluding that a bounded conditional
2
second moment EX∼Q (P0 (X)/Q(X)) implies non-reconstruction in P0 and hence non-reconstruction in P.
When we need to condition on events FM that depend on both M and X, i.e., F = {X − M ∈ F },
the conditional distribution P0 given in (19) may no longer be an additive Gaussian model, and hence Theorem 4 cannot be directly invoked. Fortunately, we are able to prove that (1/n)DKL (P0 kQ) is an asymptotic upper bound to (1/n)DKL (PkQ). As a consequence, by (16) a bounded conditional second moment
2
EX∼Q (P0 (X)/Q(X)) implies DKL (PkQ) = o(n) and hence non-reconstruction in P by invoking Theorem 4.
Let kM k∗ denote the nuclear norm of M , which equals to the sum of all the singular values of M .
Theorem 5. Let P(X) and Q(X) be the planted and null
√ models X = M +
√W and X = W respectively,
where M is drawn from some prior such that kM k2 = O( n) and kM k∗ = O( n) uniformly over all M , and
where W is a Gaussian or Wigner matrix. Suppose P0 is given in (19) with P(FM |M ) = 1 + o(1) uniformly
over all M . Then
DKL (PkQ) ≤ DKL (P0 kQ) + o(n).
√
√
Theorem 5 needs the technical assumptions that kM k2 = O( n) and kM k∗ = O( n). These assumptions
are satisfied in the sparse PCA and submatrix localization problems, but not in the Gaussian mixture
clustering problem, which has a prior distribution of unbounded support. This last fact does not impact
our results, because the conditioning we emply for the clustering lower bound is on the signal M and not
the noise, meaning that as above we can invoke Theorem 4. To deal with prior distribution of unbounded
support, one could emply a truncation argument.
10
4
4.1
Proofs
Notation and preliminary lemmas
We begin by proving Lemma 1. The proof is discussed in [26, p.97]; we give the full proof here for completeness.
Proof of Lemma 1. We focus on the Wigner noise case as the proof for Gaussian noise case is identical except
for a factor of 2. As we noted in equation (14), the conditional likelihood ratio is
2
1
1
Q(X − M )
P(X|M )
=
= e 2 hX,M i− 4 kM kF .
Q(X)
Q(X)
(22)
We have P(X) = EM P(X|M ). Reversing the order of the expectations and applying (14) gives
EX∼Q
P(X|M ) P(X|M 0 )
P(X)2
0
=
E
E
X∼Q
M,M
Q(X)2
Q(X)2
P(X|M ) P(X|M 0 )
= EM,M 0 EX∼Q
Q(X)2
1
2
0 2
kF )
1
2
0 2
kF −kM +M 0 k2F )
= EM,M 0 e− 4 (kM kF +kM
= EM,M 0 e− 4 (kM kF +kM
1
1
EX∼Q e 2 hX,M +M
0
i
0
= EM,M 0 e 2 hM,M i ,
2
where in the second-to-last line we used the moment generating function EX∼Q ehX,Ai = ekAkF . This completes the proof.
In the submatrix localization and Gaussian mixture clustering problems, the underlying low-rank signal
matrix M arises from a balanced partition σ0 : [n] → [k]. In these cases we can equivalently frame results
about reconstruction in terms of how well we can infer this original partition. Given σ0 and an estimated
partition σ
b, we define the overlap matrix as a k × k matrix ω(σ0 , σ
b) which has s, t entry equal to the fraction
of integers in [n] assigned by σ0 to group s and by σ
b to group t, i.e.
ω(σ0 , σ
b)s,t =
|σ0−1 (s) ∩ σ
b−1 (t)|
n/k
and we drop the dependence on σ0 and σ
b whenever clear. Our assumption that the partitions are balanced
implies that ω is doubly stochastic.
We can read off scalar measures of the correlation between two partitions σ and τ —i.e. of how well we
have reconstructed the planted signal—directly from ω; two will be particularly useful. It is typical in the
literature to work with what we will call the trace overlap between σ and τ , T (σ, τ ) := maxπ Tr πω(σ, τ ),
where the maximum is taken over all permutation matrices. In our problems, however, it is analytically more
2
convenient to use L(σ, τ ) := kω(σ, τ )kF , which we call the L2 overlap. Both L(·) and T (·) range from 1,
when the two partitions are uncorrelated and ω = J/k, to k, when they are identical up to a permutation of
the group labels, and ω is the corresponding permutation matrix. The following lemma states that whenever
the L2 overlap is bounded above 1, the trace overlap is as well.
Lemma 2. For any doubly stochastic matrix ω, L(ω) ≤ T (ω).
Proof. This lemma is an immediate consequence of Birkhoff’s theorem. We simply expand ω =
a convex combination of permutation matrices π and observe that
X
L(ω) = Tr ω † ω =
aπ Tr π † ω ≤ max Tr π † ω = T (ω),
π
π
the final inequality following from
P
π
aπ = 1.
11
P
π
aπ π as
Thus, to show that an estimator σ
b achieves trace overlap with the planted partition σ0 bounded above one,
it is sufficient to show that L(b
σ , σ0 ) > 1.
Finally, in the submatrix localization and Gaussian
mixture clustering
problems, our second moment
calculations will reduce to the computation of Eσ,τ exp(ξ(kωk2F − 1))/2 where the expectation is over uniformly random pairs of balanced partitions σ and τ with overlap matrix ω, and ξ is a parameter corresponding
to the signal-to-noise ratio. By [3, Lemma 6], it is straightforward to prove the following lemma giving a sufficient condition to guarantee that this expectation, and therefore the second moment as a whole, is bounded
by a constant. We will state the lemma in notation consistent with [3] and discuss afterwords.
Lemma 3. Assume that ϕ(ω) is an R-valued function of doubly-stochastic k×k matrices ω with the properties
that ϕ(J/k) = 0 and for some δ > 0 and every k × k doubly stochastic matrices ω,
H(ω) + ϕ(ω) ≤ H(J/k) + ϕ(J/k) − δ kωk2F − 1 .
Then there exists a constant C, dependent on k and δ, such that
i
h
Eσ,τ enϕ(ω) ≤ C.
Proof. Let Ω = (Ωst ) such that Ωs,t = |σ −1 (s) ∩ τ −1 (t)|. Then ω = kΩ/n. Denote by D the set of all k × k
matrices Ω = (Ωst ) of nonnegative integers such that
Q the sum of each row and each column is n/k. Notice
that for a given Ω = (Ωst ), there are precisely n!/ s,t Ωs,t ! pairs of balanced partitions (σ, τ ) with overlap
matrix given by Ω. Hence,
h
i (n/k)!2k X
n!
Q
exp (nϕ(ω))
Eσ,τ enϕ(ω) =
n!2
s,t Ωs,t !
≤ k −2n
Ω∈D
2k k−1
e n
2πk k
X
n!
exp (ϕ(ω)) ,
s,t Ωs,t !
Q
Ω∈D
(23)
√
√
where we have used Stirling’s approximation 2πn(n/e)n ≤ n! ≤ e n(n/e)n in the last step. In view of the
assumption and [3, Lemma 6], there exists a constant C 0 > 0 dependent on δ and k such that
n
X
C0
n!
C0
Q
enϕ(ω) ≤ k−1 k 2 eϕ(J/k) = k−1 k 2n .
n
n
s,t Ωs,t !
Ω∈D
Combing the last displayed equation with (23) yields that
h
i C 0 e2k
:= C,
Eσ,τ enϕ(ω) ≤
2πk k
which completes the proof.
Let us unpack
the conditions of the above lemma in the context of our problems. For us, ϕ(ω) =
(ξ/2) kωk2F − 1 , and since H(J/k) = log k and kJ/kk2F = 1, it is in fact sufficient to study the function
Φ(ω) = H(ω) − log k +
ξ
kωk2F − 1 .
2
(24)
In particular, the hypotheses of Lemma 3 are satisfied provided that Φ(ω) ≤ −δ kωk2F − 1 for every doubly
stochastic matrix ω and some δ > 0. This is the case whenever ξ is sufficiently small. On the other hand,
in the limit ξ → ∞, Φ(ω) is maximized by any permutation matrix, the doubly stochastic matrices with
maximal Frobenius norm and minimal entropy. It has been conjectured that, for general ξ, the maximizer
is a convex combination of J/k and a permutation matrix, but this has not been proved.
The precise value of ξ up to which Φ(ω) is maximized by ω = J/k is not known. Fortunately, Achlioptas
and Naor, in their second moment lower bound on the k-colorability threshold for Erdős-Rényi graphs [3],
proved an upper bound on Φ by relaxing to singly stochastic matrices.
12
Lemma 4. [3, Theorems 7,9] When ξ < 2 log(k − 1)/(k − 1), argmax Φ(ω) = J/k.
One can obtain an even tighter bound in the special case k = 2. Recall that the 2×2 doubly stochastic matrices are a one-parameter family—since the upper left entry uniquely determines the matrix. Consequently
we can rewrite Φ(ω) in (24) as
ξ
Φ(x) = h(x) + (4x2 − 4x + 1) − log 2 .
2
The second derivative of Φ(x) is 4ξ − 1/(x(1 − x)). Hence, if ξ < 1, then Φ(x) is strictly concave in x and
arg maxx Φ(x) = 1/2.
Lemma 5. When k = 2 and ξ < 1, arg maxω Φ(ω) = J/2.
4.2
Sparse PCA
In this section we prove Theorem 1. First, we show that detection and reconstruction are possible if λ >
λupper using a first moment argument as described in Section 3.1: specifically, if λ > λupper then with
high probability in Q there are no v with likelihood as high as that of the ground truth v0 , and with high
probability in P all such v are correlated with v0 . Then, we prove that the second moment of the likelihood
ratio is bounded if λ < λlower ; as discussed in Section 3.2, this implies that detection and reconstruction are
impossible if λ < λlower .
4.2.1
First moment upper bound for sparse PCA
√
Recall that X = (λ/ n)v0 v0† +W , where v0 is drawn uniformly from V = {v ∈ {±γ −1/2 , 0} : |supp(v)| = γn}
and W is a Wigner matrix. For any v ∈ V, using (14), the conditional log likelihood ratio is
log
P(X|v)
1
1
= hM, Xi − kM k2F
Q(X)
2
4
1 λ2
1 λ
kvk42
= √ hv, Xvi −
2 n
4 n
1 λ
λ2 n
= √ hv, Xvi −
.
2 n
4
In the null model, X = W and hv, Xvi is distributed as N (0, 2n2 ), giving
2
P(X|v)
λ n λ2 n
log
∼N −
,
.
Q(X)
4
2
(25)
On the other hand, in the planted model
λ
λ
hv, Xvi = hv, W vi + √ hv, v0 v0† vi = hv, W vi + √ hv, v0 i2 ,
n
n
so the conditional log likelihood has a distribution which depends on the inner product between v and the
ground truth v0 . We write this inner product as hv, v0 i = θn, for θ ∈ [−1, 1] so that
(2θ2 − 1)λ2 n λ2 n
P(X | v)
∼N
,
log
Q(X)
4
2
Whenever θ = 0 so that v is uncorrelated with v0 , this distribution is identical to that in the null model.
To show that detection is possible above (3), notice that in the planted model the maximum likelihood
estimate vb = argmaxv∈V P(X|v) has conditional log likelihood at least as large as the ground truth v0 . By
standard Gaussian tail bounds and setting θ = ±1 above,
p
P(X|v0 )
λ2 n
P log
≤
− O( n log n) ≤ n−Ω(1) .
Q(X)
4
13
In the null model, Gaussian tail bounds give us
2
p
p
P(X|v)
λ2 n
λ n
Q log
≥
− O( n log n) ≤ exp −
+ O( n log n) .
Q(X)
4
4
n
n
Taking the union bound over all 2γn γn
possible v and invoking Stirling’s formula γn
≤ enh(γ) , we have
√
2
p
P(X|v)
λ2 n
n − λ 4n +h(γ)+γ log 2 +O( n log n)
Q max log
.
≥
− O( n log n) ≤ exp
v∈V
Q(X)
4
(26)
When this expression is e−Ω(n) , we can with high probability distinguish the null and planted models with
the generalized likelihood test. This occurs when λ < λupper where λupper is defined in (3), i.e.,
λ2
> h(γ) + γ log 2 .
4
(27)
Next, we prove that reconstruction is also possible above this bound. Suppose that X is generated from
the planted model, and that hb
v , v0 i = θn. We bound the probability that vb has conditional log likelihood
as large as v0 with a union bound over vb correlated with v0 , but we bound the number of such vectors
n
generously as 2γn γn
once again. Combining this with the Gaussian tail bound and invoking Stirling gives
p
P(X|v)
λ2 n
>
+ O( n log n)
Q(X)
4
v∈V:hv,v0 i≤θn
p
(2θ2 − 1)λ2
≤ exp n
+ h(γ) + γ log 2 + O( n log n) .
4
P
max
log
Since the coefficient of n in the exponent is an analytic function of θ, whenever (27) holds, the RHS of
the last displayed equation is exponentially small unless θ2 > ε for some constant ε > 0. Therefore,
with high probability the MLE estimator has overlap (hb
v , v0 i/n)2 = θ2 > ε > 0 with the ground truth.
√
†
2
4
2
c, M i =
c = (λ/ n)b
ck = (λ /n)kb
v k2 = λ2 n; moreover, with high probability hM
Moreover, if M
v vb , then kM
F
2
2
2
c
(λ /n)hb
v , v0 i > ελ n. Hence, the estimator M reconstructs the signal matrix better than chance.
4.2.2
Second moment lower bound for sparse PCA
In this subsection, we use the second moment method to prove a lower bound on the detectability transition
for sparse PCA. We assume λ < 1 throughout√the proof; the boundary case λ = 1 is not addressed. In the
planted model, the signal matrix is M = (λ/ n)vv † , and in the null model it is zero. In both cases, we
have X = M + W where W is a Wigner noise matrix. Applying Lemma 1, the second moment (where X is
drawn from the null model) is
EX∼Q
P(X)
Q(X)
2
λ2
2
= Ev,w e 2n hv,wi ,
(28)
where v and w are drawn independently from the prior.
Denote the overlap z = |supp(v) ∩ supp(w)| and let t be the difference between the number of indices in
that intersection where v and w agree and the number of indices where they disagree. In that case,
hv, wi =
t
.
γ
Then, z follows an hypergeometric distribution with parameter (n, γn, γn) and given z, t is distributed as a
sum of z independent Rademacher random variables. If we write
η = λ/γ ,
14
(29)
then
EX∼Q
P(X)
Q(X)
2
2 2
η t
= Et e 2n .
We know from [4, p.173] that z has the same distribution as the random variable E[z|Bn ] where z is a Binomial
random variable with parameters (γn, γ) and Bn some suitable σ-algebra. Given z, let t be distributed as a
sum of z independent Rademacher variables.
Lemma 6. Let (i )i≥1 denote a sequence of independent Rademacher random variables. For anyPa > 0, let
z
g be the piecewise linear function on [1, ∞) such that, for any positive integer z, g(z) = E exp[a( i=1 i )2 ].
Then, the function g is convex.
Proof. Since g is convex and continuously differentiable on each interval of the form (z, z + 1) where z is an
integer, we only have to prove that its left derivative is less or equal
its right derivative at z + 1. This is
Pto
z
equivalent to showing that g(z + 2) + g(z) ≥ 2g(z + 1). Define u = i=1 i . Conditioning with respect to u,
2
2
we obtain g(z + 1) = Eu [eau +a cosh 2au] and g(z + 2) = Eu [eau [0.5e4a cosh 4au + 0.5]. Hence, it suffices to
prove that, for any u,
1
3
ea cosh 2au ≤ e4a cosh 4au + .
4
4
√
For x ≥ 0, let h(x) = eax cosh(2au x). Since h is a product of two increasing convex functions, h is also
convex. This implies the above inequality and concludes the proof.
By Jensen’s inequality, it follows that
EX∼Q
P(X)
Q(X)
2
2 2
η t
≤ Et e 2n .
(30)
To simplify the notation, we simply write z and t instead of z and t in the sequel. Note that
22
X
z
η t
η 2 u2
Et e 2n | z =
e 2n (Pt [|t| ≥ u | z] − Pt [|t| ≥ u + 1 | z])
u=0
≤1+
z
X
η 2 u η 2 u2
e 2n Pt [|t| ≥ u | z]
n
u=1
≤1+2
z
X
η 2 u u22 ηn2 − z1
,
e
n
u=1
where we applied Hoeffding’s inequality: Pt (|t| ≥ u | z) ≤ 2e−u
We consider three subcases depending on the value of z.
Case 1: If z ≤ (n/η 2 )λ,
22
η t
Et e 2n | z
≤
≤
where we used z ≤
nλ
η2
2
/(2z)
(31)
(32)
in the last line.
Z ∞ 2 −u2 η2
z
X
η 2 u u22 ηn2 − z1
η u 2 z1 − n
e
≤ 1 + O(1)
e
du
n
n
0
u=1
η2
1
≤
O
,
O(1) 1 +
n/z − η 2
1−λ
1+2
in the last inequality.
15
(33)
Case 2: If (n/η 2 )λ < z ≤ n/η 2 , we have
22
η t
2n
n
n
Ez Et e
| z 1z∈( 2 λ, 2 ]
η
η
"
!
#
z
X
η 2 u u22 ηn2 − z1
≤ Ez
1+2
1z∈( n2 λ, n2 ]
e
n
η
η
u=1
η 2 (z + 1)2
≤ Ez
1+
1z∈( n2 λ, n2 ]
n
η
η
h
i
≤ O(1 + nγ)Pz z ≥ ηn2 λ ,
where in the second inequality we bound exp u2 /2 η 2 /n − 1/z ≤ 1 and in the third inequality we use
z ≤ n/η 2 and z ≤ nγ. Since λ/η 2 = γ 2 /λ > γ 2 and z ∼ Bin(γn, γ), Bernstein’s inequality implies that
Pz z ≥ (n/η 2 )λ is exponentially small. Therefore,
22
η t
(34)
Ez Et e 2n |z 1z∈( n2 λ, n2 ] = o(1) .
η
η
Case 3: Finally, if n/η 2 < z ≤ γn, then exp u2 /2 η 2 /n − 1/z is exponentially large in u. Thus to show
that the second moment is finite, we need to use the fact that Pz [z ≥ a] for a > n/η 2 is exponentially small.
When z > n/η 2 , the bound in(32) implies that
22
2 2
z
X
η t
z2 η2
z
η2 u
z η
z
Et e 2n | z ≤ 1 + 2e 2n − 2
≤ O(n) exp
−
,
n
2n
2
u=1
where we applied z ≤ γn and the second inequality holds due to λ < 1. For any 0 < p0 < p1 ≤ 1, define
1 − p1
p1
hp0 (p1 ) = p1 log( p0 ) + (1 − p1 ) log
,
(35)
1 − p0
the KL-divergence between Bernoulli random variables with parameters p0 and p1 respectively. Chernoff’s
inequality implies that for any a ≥ γ 2 n,
a
.
Pz [z ≥ a] ≤ exp −γnhγ
γn
As a consequence,
22
η t
Ez Et e 2n | z 1z∈( n2 ,γn]
≤
O(n)
η
γn
X
exp
z=n/η 2
"
≤
2
O(n ) exp n
z
z2 η2
− − γnhγ
2n
2
#
sup
z
γn
ψ(ζ) ,
ζ∈[1/η 2 ,γ]
where
(η 2 ζ − 1)ζ
(η 2 ζ − 1)ζ
ψ(ζ) =
− γhγ (ζ/γ) =
− ζ log
2
2
ζ
γ−ζ
− (γ − ζ) log
+ γ log(γ) ,
γ
1−γ
(36)
Then, we need to show that
ψ(ζ) < 0
for all
2
ζ ∈ [γ 2 /λ2 , γ] ,
(37)
2
Note that this property is trivial when γ/λ > 1 so that we may restrict our attention to γ/λ ≤ 1. Since
λ < 1, it follows that ψ(γ 2 /λ2 ) = −γhγ (γ/λ2 ) < 0. For ζ = γ, ψ(ζ) = (λ2 − γ)/2 − γ log(1/γ) , which is
negative for
p
λ < 2γ(− log γ + 1/2) .
(38)
16
λ
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
γ
Figure 1: Upper and lower bounds on the information-theoretic detectability threshold in sparse PCA.
Our upper bound (dashed) shows that the detectability threshold is strictly below the spectral threshold
λ = γη = 1 for γ < 0.054. The solid line shows the lower bound given by (37), and the dotted line shows
the simpler lower bound given√by (40). Notice that the solid line is not touching the dashed line even in the
limit γ → 0; there is a gap of 2.
Moreover, the second derivative of ψ has at most two roots. It follows that ψ(ζ) can have at most three
local minima or maxima occurring at the roots of
ζ(1 − γ)
1
0
2
.
ψ = η ζ − − log
2
γ(γ − ζ)
Figure 1 shows λ as a function of γ, illustrating in particular that it rapidly approaches the spectral transition
λ = 1 as γ approaches 1.
We now derive an analytic bound of ψ. For ζ ∈ (γ 2 /λ2 , γ],
η2 γ − 1
ζ
1−γ
ψ(ζ) ≤ ζ
− ζ log
+
γ(1
−
ζ/γ)
log
2
γ2
1 − ζ/γ
2
η γ−1
ζ
≤ζ
− ζ log
+ ζ − γ2
2
γ2
2
λ /γ + 1
+ 2 log λ ,
≤ζ
2
2
2
2
where we used log(1
line and
+ x) ≤2x2 in the
second
ζ ≥ γ /λ ≥ γ in the third line.
Therefore, Ez Et exp η t /2n | z 1z∈(n/η2 ,γn] , and hence the second moment, are bounded as long as
log λ2 +
λ2 /γ + 1
< 0.
2
If, for any y > 0, we use W(y) to denote the root x of xex = y, (39) holds whenever
s
1
λ < 2γW √
.
2 eγ
As y → ∞, we have W(y) ∼ log y. Thus as γ → 0, this lower bound approaches
s
1
lower
λ
∼ 2γ log √ .
2 eγ
17
(39)
(40)
(41)
Let us now turn to regime γ > 0.6, where we will show the second moment is bounded whenever λ < 1.
In view of (33) and (34), it suffices to prove that
22
η t
Ez Et e 2n | z 1z∈(γ 2 n,γn] = O(1) ,
whenever λ < 1. From (31), we have
22
η t
2n
Ez Et e
| z 1z∈(γ 2 n,γn]
"
#
z
X
η 2 u η 2 u2
≤ Ez 1 +
e 2n Pt [|t| ≥ u | z] 1z∈(γ 2 n,γn
n
u=1
γn X
z
X
(a)
γn z
η 2 u η2 u2
γ (1 − γ)γn−z
≤ 1+
e 2n Pt [|t| ≥ u | z]
z
n
z=γ 2 n u=1
2
γn X
z
X
(b)
(1−λ2 )u2
η2 u
u
u
1
z
− 2nγ 2
p
≤ 1 + O(1)
e
exp
+ zh
+
− z log(2) − γnhγ
,
2
2nγ
2z
2
γn
(z(1 − z/γn)) ∨ 1
2 u=1 n
z=γ n
where we used in (a) that z follows a Binomial distribution. In step (b), hγ is defined as in (35), and we
have used the facts that
u+z
u+z
≤ 2 exp −zh1/2
Pt [|t| ≥ u | z] = 2 Pr Bin(z, 1/2) ≥
2
2z
and
γn
≤
z
!
z
p
∧ 1 exp γnh
γn
2πz(1 − z/(γn))
1
for z ≤ γn.
Expanding as Taylor series, we have
4
h(u) ≤ log(2) − 2(u − 1/2)2 − (u − 1/2)4
3
and hγ (u) ≥
(u − γ)2
.
2γ(1 − γ)
This yields
22
η t
Ez Et e 2n |z 1z∈(γ 2 n,γn]
≤ 1 + O(1)
γn X
z
X
z=γ 2 n
u=1
η2 u
n
p
(z(1 − z/γn)) ∨ 1
e
−
(1−λ2 )u2
2nγ 2
2
2
4
2
u
u
u
(z/(γn)
−
γ)
expn
−
−
−
2(γn)2
2zn 12z 3 n
2(1 − γ)
|
{z
}
= (I)
We focus on the term (I), which is maximized with respect to u by choosing
1
1
1
u2 = × 12z 3 n
−
.
2
2γ 2 n2
2zn
18
Hence,
2
1 γn
(z/(γn) − γ)2
3 z3
−
−
2
3
4γ n
γ
z
2(1 − γ)
2
3z
1
z
≤
−
−γ
4γ 2 n 2(1 − γ)
γn
2
3
1
z
≤
−
−γ
,
4γ
2(1 − γ)
γn
(I) ≤
since z ≤ γn. The above expression is negative as soon as γ > 0.6. For such a choice of γ, there exist two
positive constants c1 and c2 such that
22
γn X
z
X
(z−γ 2 n)2
η t
u2
u
2n
p
e−c1 n e−c2 n
Ez Et e
|z 1z∈(γ 2 n,γn] ≤ 1 + O(1)
= O(1) ,
n (z(1 − z/γn)) ∨ 1
z=γ 2 n u=1
where the last equality holds because
γ > 0.6.
Pz
u=1 (u/n)e
−c1 u2 /n
= O(n). This completes the proof in the regime
The conclusion for reconstruction follows by applying (16) and Theorem 4. Furthermore, for any estimator
c = (λ/√n)b
vb ∈ V of v, applying Theorem 4 to the estimator M
v vb† gives
1
1
ci = o(1) .
Ehv, vbi2 =
EhM, M
n2
nλ2
Thus we can neither reconstruct the signal matrix nor the sparse vector v.
4.2.3
Conditional second moment lower bound for sparse PCA
Bounding the second moment is too rough
to pinpoint the exact information-theoretical threshold for small
√
γ. Indeed, there is asymptotically an 2 gap between the λlower and λupper . To recover the exact constant,
we shall bound some conditional second moment. Throughout this proof, we consider λ such that
s
"
#
1
1
3e
3
1
2
λ < 4γ log
− 2.1 2 log
− log
≤ 4γ log
.
(42)
γ
γ
2
1−γ
γ
We shall restrict our attention to γ small enough that log(1/γ) > 41 + log(81), which is equivalent to
s
1
√
.
(43)
9 γ < 2γW √
2 eγ
For any set a ⊂ [n] and any square matrix X, let Xa refer to the matrix whose entries outside a × a have
been set to zero. Given a vector v, we define the event Γv by
λ
√
†
Γv := k(X − √ vv )supp(v) k2 ≤ 2.1 nγ .
(44)
n
Under P(·|v), the supp(v) × supp(v) submatrix of X − √λn vv † is distributed as a Wigner Matrix. By [7,
√
Theorem 5.1], its spectral norm rescaled by γn converges almost surely to 2 when n → ∞, and so P(Γv |v) =
1 + o(1) uniformly with respect to v. The event Γv means that the noise added to the nonzero entries of vv †
is not uncharacteristiaclly large.
19
Next, we condition on the high probability events Γv and define the conditional probability distribution
1Γv
0
.
(45)
P (X) = Ev P(X|v)
P(Γv |v)
The conditional second moment decomposes as
02
P (X)
P(X|v)P(X|w)
1Γv 1Γw
EX∼Q
=
E
E
v,w
X∼Q
Q2 (X)
Q2 (X)
P(Γv |v)P(Γw |w)
†
†
λ
λ2 n
√
<vv +ww ,X>− 2
≤ (1 + o(1))Ev,w EX∼Q e 2 n
1Γv ,
{z
}
|
= (I)
where we used that P(Γv |v) = 1 + o(1). Introduce the notation z = |supp(v) ∩ supp(w)|, t+ = |supp(v + w)|,
t− = |supp(v − w)| and t = t+ − t− , so that that z = t+ + t− . Finally, we define the function
r
λ t2+ + t2−
n
√
+
2.1
(t+ + t− ) .
g(t+ , t− ) :=
γ
γ2 n
Under Γv , one has hvv † , Xsupp(v+w) + Xsupp(v−w) i ≤Sg(t+ , t− ). To bound (I), we first integrate with respect
to entries of X outside supp(v + w) × supp(v + w) supp(v − w) × supp(v − w).
λ2 z 2
λ
†
(I) = EX∼Q exp √ hvv , Xsupp(v+w) + Xsupp(v−w) i − 2
1Γv
2γ n
n
λ
λ2 z 2
†
≤ EX∼Q exp √ hvv , Xsupp(v+w) + Xsupp(v−w) i − 2
1hvv† ,Xsupp(v+w) +Xsupp(v−w) i≤g(t+ ,t− )
2γ n
n
2
q
2 + t2 )
2 2
2(t
λ
(a)
+
−
λ
t
1
g(t
,
t
)γ
+ −
√
≤ exp 2 −
−q
2γ n 2
γ n
2
2
2(t+ + t− )
+
!2
√
2 2
η t
1 η z 2 + t2
√
,
√
≤ exp
−
− 2.1 nγ
2n
2
2 n
+
where we used
2
EY ∼N (0,1) [eaY 1Y ≤b ] ≤ ea
/2−(a−b)2+ /2
and the fact that hvv † , Xsupp(v+w) + Xsupp(v−w) i ∼ N (0, 2(t2+ + t2− )/γ 2 ) in (a) and η = λ/γ in the last
line. When v and w are sampled independently according to the sparse PCA model, then z follows a
hypergeometric distribution with parameters (n, γn, γn). Conditioned on z, t is distributed as a sum of z
independent Rademacher random variables. Returning to the second moment, we arrive at
!2
√
02
2 2
2 + t2
P (X)
η
t
1
η
z
√
.
√
EX∼Q
≤ (1 + o(1)) Ez,t exp
−
− 2.1 nγ
(46)
Q2 (X)
2n
2
2 n
+
0
In comparison to the second
moment
√
√ bound√for the original distribution P(X), the bound for P (X) involves
a correction factor λ z 2 + t2 /2γ n − 2.1 nγ + , which is most effective when z is large. If instead z ≤
n/(2η 2 ), we make use of the bound (33) proved for second moment bound:
22
η t
η2
2n
Et e
|z ≤ O 1 +
= O (1) .
(47)
n/z − η 2
20
For larger values of z, we rely on the fact that the hypergeometric distribution with parameters (n, γn, γn)
is stochastically dominated by the Binomial distribution with parameters (γn, γ/(1 − γ)). It follows from
Chernoff’s bound that
2
ηt
Ez,t e 2n 1z∈(
n
2η 2
,γn/3)
γn/3
(a)
X
≤
exp
z=n/(2η 2 )
γn/3
(b)
X
≤
z=n/(2η 2 )
γn/3
(c)
X
≤
z=n/(2η 2 )
γn/3
(d)
X
≤
z=n/(2η 2 )
η2 z2
− γnhγ/(1−γ)
2n
z
γn
2
η z
z(1 − γ)
exp z
− log
2n
eγ 2 n
2
1−γ
1
2eλ2
λ
− log
∨
+ log
exp z
6γ
3eγ
4
1−γ
2
1−γ
8e5/4 γ log(1/γ)
λ
− log
∨ log
exp z
6γ
3eγ
1−γ
γn/3
X
≤
exp(−z) = o(1) ,
(48)
z=n/(2η 2 )
where the last line holds for some constant > 0 in view of (42) and of the condition γ < 1/(81e41 ). We
used in (a) that t ≤ z, in (b) that hp0 (p1 ) ≥ p1 log(p1 /(ep0 )) in (c) that the function x 7→ η 2 x/(2n) − log(x)
is decreasing on (0, 2n/η 2 ] and increasing on [2n/η 2 , ∞). and in (d) that λ2 ≤ −4γ log γ.
Finally, we turn to the case z ∈ [γn/3, γn], for which we will rely on the correcting term in (46). Assume
√
that λ ≥ 9 γ without loss of generality, because otherwise by (43), the second moment is bounded without
any conditioning. For z larger than γn/3,
√
λz
√
√ ≥ 2.1 nγ,
2γ n
and we can once again apply Chernoff’s bound to obtain
!2
√
2 2
2
2
1 η z +t
η t
√
1z∈(γn/3,γn]
√
−
− 2.1 nγ
Ez,t exp
2n
2
2 n
+
"
#
2 !
η2 z2
1
ηz
√
√ − 2.1 nγ
≤ Ez,t exp
−
1z∈(γn/3,γn]
2n
2
2n
+
2 2
γn
X
η z
2.1 √
z
≤
exp
+ √ ηz γ − γnhγ/(1−γ)
4n
γn
2
z=γn/3
(a)
≤
≤
γn
X
η2 z2
2.1 √
z(1 − γ)
exp
+ √ ηz γ − z log
4n
eγ 2 n
2
z=γn/3
2
√
γn
X
2.1η γ
η γ
1
3e
exp z
− log
+ √
+ log
4
γ
1−γ
2
z=γn/3
≤
γn
X
e−z = o(1) ,
z=γn/3
where we used t ≤ z and the fact that the whole exponent is monotone increasing in t2 in the first line. The
last inequality holds for some constant > 0, because of condition (42) on λ together with the inequality
21
p
λ ≤ 2 γ log(1/γ). In
h 02(a), iwe applied hp0 (p1 ) ≥ p1 log(p1 /(ep0 )). Together with (46), (47), and (48), we
(X)
= O(1).
conclude that EX∼Q PQ2 (X)
Conditional second moment bound for reconstruction In view of (16) and a bounded
√ conditional
second moment, we have DKL (P0 kQ) = O(1). Also, we have kM k∗ = kM k2 = √λn kvk22 = λ n. Therefore,
the conclusion for reconstruction follows by applying Theorem 4 together with Theorem 5.
4.3
Submatrix Localization
√
In this section we prove Theorem 2. Recall that X = (µ/ n) (Y − J/k) + W , where σ0 : [n] → [k] is a
balanced partition, Yi,j = 1σ0 (i)=σ0 (j) , and W is Wigner.
4.3.1
First moment upper bound for submatrix localization
It follows from (14) that the conditional log likelihood ratio reads
log
P(X|σ)
µ
µ2
= √ hY − J/k, Xi −
kY − J/kk2F .
Q(X)
4n
2 n
Therefore, maximizing log P(X|σ)/Q(X) over σ is equivalent to computing
X
Xi,j (Yi,j − 1/k) .
max T (σ) := max
σ
σ
i<j
In both the planted model and the null model, T (σ) is the sum of independent, Gaussian random variables
and is therefore itself Gaussian. Under Q,
n2 (k − 1)
T (σ) ∼ N 0,
+
O(n)
.
2k 2
Under P, denoting by σ0 the planted partition,
X
µ X
T (σ) = √
1σ0 (i)=σ0 (j) − 1/k 1σ(i)=σ(j) − 1/k +
Wi,j 1σ(i)=σ(j) − 1/k
n i<j
i<j
X
µ X
n2
=√
1σ0 (i)=σ0 (j), σ(i)=σ(j) +
Wi,j 1σ(i)=σ(j) − 1/k − 2 + O(n).
2k
n i<j
i<j
Hence the distribution of T (σ) depends on the overlap matrix ω between σ and the planted partition σ0 .
2
For a given ω, among all n2 pairs i, j with i < j, there are kωkF n2 /2k 2 + O(n) paris such that σ0 (i) = σ0 (j)
and σ(i) = σ(j). Therefore,
!
2
µn2 (kωkF − 1)
n2 (k − 1)
√
T (σ) ∼ N
+ O(n),
+ O(n) .
2k 2
2k 2 n
To prove that detection is possible, notice that in the planted model, maxσ T (σ) ≥ T (σ0 ). Setting ω = I,
Gaussian tail bounds tell us that
p
n2 µ(k − 1)
√
− O(n log n) ≤ n−Ω(1) .
P T (σ0 ) >
2k 2 n
In the null model, taking the union bound over the nk ways to choose σ, we can bound the probability that
any partition is as good, according to T , as the planted one, by
p
p
n2 µ(k − 1)
µ2 (k − 1)
√
Q max T (σ) >
+ O( log n/n)
− O(n log n) ≤ exp n log k −
.
σ
4k 2
2k 2 n
22
Thus the probability of this event is e−Ω(n) whenever
µ2 >
4k 2 log k
,
k−1
meaning that above this threshold we can distinguish the null and planted models with generalized likelihood
testing.
To prove that reconstruction is possible, we compute in the planted model the probability that T (σ) >
T (σ0 ) given that σ has L2 overlap z with the planted partition, and argue that this probability tends to zero
whenever the overlap is small enough. Taking the union bound over every σ with L2 overlap at most z gives
#
"
p
p
µ2 (k − z)2
n2 µ(k − 1)
√
.
− O(n log n) ≤ exp n log k − 2
+ O( log n/n)
P
max
T (σ) ≥
k (k − 1)
2k 2 n
kω(σ,σ0 )k2F ≤z
By the assumption that µ2 > 4k 2 log k/(k − 1), it follows that there exists a fixed constant > 0 such that
µ2 (1 − )2 > 4k 2 log k/(k − 1). Hence, setting z = 1 + (k − 1) in the last displayed equation, it yields that
with probability at least 1 − e−Ω(n) ,
max2
T (σ) <
kω(σ,σ0 )kF ≤z
p
n2 µ(k − 1)
√
−
O(n
log n),
2k 2 n
and consequently kw(b
σML , σ0 )k2F ≥ 1 + (k − 1). By Lemma 2, this further implies that the trace overlap satc so that M
cij = (µ/√n)1σb (i)=bσ (j) .
isfies T (b
σML , σ0 ) ≥ 1+(k−1). Moreover, construct an n×n matrix M
ML
ML
ck2 = O(n), and
Then kM
F
2
c, M i = nµ kw(b
hM
σML , σ0 )k2F − 1 + O(1),
2
k
which is at least nµ2 (k − 1)/k 2 + O(1) with high probability. Thus, we can reconstruct the signal matrix
M and the planted partition σ0 better than chance.
4.3.2
Second moment lower bound for submatrix localization
We first prove that when
2
µ <
(
k2
k=2
2k2 log(k−1)
k−1
k ≥ 3,
(49)
then the second moment is bounded. Applying Lemma 1,
EX∼Q
P(X)
Q(X)
2
= Eσ,τ exp
µ2
hY − J/k, Y 0 − J/ki ,
2n
where Yij = 1σ(i)=σ(j) and Yij0 = 1τ (i)=τ (j) . Recall that ω denotes the overlap matrix between partitions σ
and τ . Then hY, Y 0 i = n2 kωk2F /k 2 and hY, Ji = hY 0 , Ji = n2 /k. It follows from the last displayed equation
that
2
2
P(X)
µ n
2
EX∼Q
= Eσ,τ exp
(kωkF − 1) ,
(50)
Q(X)
2k 2
Lemmata 3, 4 and 5 assure us that this expression is bounded by a constant so long as (49) holds.
For reconstruction, in view of (16) and a bounded second moment, DKL (PkQ) = O(1). Apply Theorem 4
c
c 2
ci] = o(n). Recall that σ0 is the planted
so that for any estimator
O(n), we have E[hM, M
√ M with kM kF = √
partition and M = (µ/ n)(Y − J/k) = (µ/ n)U U † , where U ∈ Rn×k with Uis = 1σ0 (i)=s − 1/k. Then for
23
b such that U
bis = 1σb(i)=s − 1/k and letting M
c = (µ/√n)U
bU
b † , it follows
any estimator σ
b of σ0 , by defining U
that
1
b k2F = 1 EhM, M
ci = o(1).
EkU † U
n2
µ2 n
Finally, notice that by letting ω = ω(b
σ , σ0 ),
b k2F =
kU † U
n2
n2 X
(ω`,s − 1/k)2 = 2 kωk2F − 1 ;
2
k
k
`,s
thus Ekωk2F = 1 + o(1). Hence, we can neither reconstruct the signal matrix M nor the planted partition σ0 .
4.3.3
Conditional second moment lower bound for submatrix localization
Notice that in the large k asymptotic, the right hand side of (49) converges to 2k log k, while the first moment
upper bound gives 4k log k. To match the first moment upper bound in the larger k asymptotic, we apply a
conditional second moment method. In the sequel we assume that
µ2 ≤ 4k log k − 44k log3/4 (k).
(51)
If log k < 114 , then 4k log k − 44k log3/4 k is negative. Hence, we focus on the setting log k ≥ 114 .
For any partition σ : [n] → k, let M = √µn (Yσ − J/k) and define the event Γσ by
p
Γσ := sup [X − M ]σ−1 (`) ≤ 3 n/k ,
2
1≤`≤k
where [X − M ]σ−1 (`) denotes the σ −1 (`) × σ −1 (`) submatrix of X − M . In other words, on Γσ , the specp
tral noms of submatrices [X − M ]σ−1 (`) for every 1 ≤ ` ≤ k are all upper bounded by 3 n/k. Since
[X − M ]σ−1 (`) is distributed as a Wigner Matrix under P(.|σ), by Gaussian concentration theorem and
Slepian’s inequality we have
h
i
p
2
P [X − M ]σ−1 (`) ≥ 2 n/k + t | σ ≤ e−t /4 , ∀1 ≤ ` ≤ k.
2
Since k = o(n/ log(n)), we have P(Γσ |σ) = 1 + o(1) uniformly with respect to σ.
Next, we condition on the high probability events Γσ by defining
1Γσ
,
P0 (X) = Eσ P(X|σ)
P(Γσ |σ)
It follows that the conditional second moment satisfies
"
2 #
P0 (X)
P(X|σ)P(X|τ )
1Γσ 1Γτ
EX∼Q
= Eσ,τ EX∼Q
Q(X)
Q2 (X)
P(Γσ |σ)P(Γτ |τ )
µ
µ2
2
√ hX,Yσ +Yτ −2J/ki−
2n kYσ −J/kkF
1Γσ ,
= (1 + o(1))Eσ,τ EX∼Q e 2 n
|
{z
}
= (I)
where we used that P(Γv |v) = 1 + o(1). Given σ and τ , define A``0 = σ −1 (`) ∩ τ −1 (`0 ) and the event
X
p
µ
1
Γ``0 =
|A``0 |2 + 3|A``0 | n/k
Xij ≤ √
1−
k
n
i,j∈A``0
24
Obviously, Γ``0 ⊂ Γσ for all `, `0 ∈ [k]. Equipped with this notation, we bound (I) by the exponential moment
of k 2 + 1 thresholded normal random variables:
Y
k
2
µ
µ
√ hX, Yσ + Yτ − 2J/ki −
kYσ − J/kk2F
1Γ``0
(I) ≤ EX∼Q exp
2n
2 n
`,`0 =1
r 2 !
2
Y
k
n
µ
1 |A``0 |
1
√
−3
≤ exp
hYσ − J/k, Yτ − J/ki
exp − µ 1 −
2n
2
k
2k
2n
+
0
`,` =1
where we used
2
EZ∼N (0,1) [eaZ 1Z≤b ] ≤ ea
/2−(a−b)2+ /2
.
Recall that ω denotes the overlap matrix between σ and τ . Then hYσ , Yτ i = nkωk2F /k 2 , hYσ , Ji = hYσ , Ji =
n2 /k and |A``0 | = nω``0 /k. Define
ak :=3 log1/4 (k)
bk :=2/k + 6/ak .
It follows from the last displayed equation that
log(I)
n
≤
≤
√ !2
k
1
1− −3
k
µω``0
`,`
+
2
2 X
µ
µ
1
2
(1 + bk )(kωk2F − 1) + 2
ω``
1ω 0 ≤√kak /µ ,
0 −
2
``
4k 2
4k
k
0
µ2
µ2 X 2
2
(kωk
−
1)
−
ω 0
F
2k 2
4k 2 0 ``
(52)
`,`
where we used (1 − x)2+ ≥ max((1 − 2x), 0) and bk ≤ 1 since log k ≥ 114 in the second line. Unfortunately,
the expression
X
1
2
exp
1ω 0 ≤√kak /µ
ω``
0 −
``
k2
0
`,`
is not easy to integrate over ω. This is why we shall bound it by a combination of the entropy of ω and a
second degree polynomial.
Lemma 7. Let t ∈ (0, 1) be such that t ≤ 0.4 and t ≥ k3 ∨ ( ke )1/5 ∨
2+5t
ct := log5tk−1 − k[log
k−1] > 0, we have for any x ∈ [0, 1],
1−1/k
2[log k−1]
∨
2 log k
5(k−2 log k+1) .
1
1
log k
)1
≤
5t(x
−
)(1
−
x)
+
c
x
log(x)
+
.
x<t
t
k2
k
k
h
i
Proof. Indeed, let g be defined by g(x) = 5t(x − k1 )(1 − x) + ct x log(x) + logk k − (x2 −
Upon defining
(x2 −
0
00
ct
x
(53)
1
k2 )1x<t .
For any
x 6= t, g (x) = 5t(−2x + 1 + 1/k) + ct log(xe) − 2x1x<t and g (x) = − 10t − 2 · 1x<t . Since ct ≤ 10t2 , g 0 is
increasing on (0, ct /[2 + 10t]) and decreasing on (ct /[2 + 10t], t) and (t, 1]. Besides, ct /[2 + 10t] ≥ 1/k as this
2 log k
0
inequality reduces t ≥ 5(k−2
log k+1) . Since ct has been chosen in such a way that g (1/k) = 0, the minimum
of g is either achieved at 1/k, t− , or 1. We have g(1/k) = 0 and g(1) = ct log k/k > 0, and
g(t− ) ≥ 5t(t − 1/k)(1 − t) − ct t log(1/t) − t2 ≥ t2 −
5t2 log(1/t)
≥0,
log k − 1
where we used (t − 1/k)(1 − t) ≥ 2t/5 and t ≥ (e/k)1/5 . We have proved (53).
25
√
√
√
Since µ ≤ 2 k log k, we have kak /µ ≥ 32 log−1/4 (k). Assuming that µ ≥ 2.5 kak and since log k ≥ 114 ,
√
the assumptions of (53) are satisfied for t = kak /µ. Writing ck for c√kak /µ , it follows from (52) and (53)
that
5µak X
log(I)
µ2
1
µ2 ck X
log k
2
0 −
0) +
0 log(ω``0 ) +
(1
+
b
)(kωk
−
1)
+
≤
ω
(1
−
ω
ω
k
``
``
``
F
n
4k 2
k
4k 2
k
4k 3/2 0
0
`,`
(a)
≤
≤
≤
2
`,`
2
µ
(1 + bk )(kωk2F − 1) −
4k 2
µ2
(1 + bk )(kωk2F − 1) −
4k 2
µ ck
[H(ω) − log k]
4k
5µak
√
[H(ω) − log k]
4 k(log k − 1)
µ2
(1 + bk )(kωk2F − 1) −
4k 2
15
2
log−1/4 (k) [H(ω) − log k] ,
P
where (a) follows because ω is doubly stochastic so that `,`0 (ω``0 − k1 )(1 − ω``0 ) = 1 − kωk2F ≤ 0; the
√
√
last inequality holds due to µ ≤ 2 k log k. If µ ≤ 2.5 kak , we simply come back to (52) to ensure that
2
µ
2
log(I) ≤ n 2k
2 (kωkF − 1). We arrive at
"
2 #
P0 (X)
EX∼Q
≤ (1 + o(1))Eσ,τ exp n t1 (kωk2F − 1) − t2 (H(ω) − log k)
(54)
Q(X)
√
√
−1/4
µ2
µ2
kak and t1 = 4k
with t1 = 2k
(k) when µ ≥ 2.5 kak .
2 and t2 = 0 when µ < 2.5
2 (1 + bk ) and t2 = 8 log
Hence, to prove the conditional second moment is bounded, it reduces to verifying the right hand side of
(54) is bounded. By assumption (51) and log k ≥ 114 , it holds that
4k 2
µ2 ≤
log(k − 1) − 8 log(k − 1) log−1/4 (k) − 1 .
(k − 1)(1 + bk )
This further implies that
t1
log(k − 1) − 1/(1 − t2 )
≤
.
1 − t2
k−1
Therefore, by Lemma 4, we have that for all ω,
1
(H(ω) − log k) (1 − t2 ) + t1 kωk2F − 1 ≤ −
(kωk2F − 1).
k−1
Hence, assumptions in Lemma 3 are satisfied with ϕ(ω) = t1 (kωk2F − 1) − t2 [H(ω) − log k] and δ = 1/(k − 1),
and it follows from Lemma 3 that the right hand side of (54) is bounded.
Conditional second moment bound for reconstruction In view of (16) and a bounded conditional
second moment, we have DKL (P0 kQ) = O(1). Also, we have that
√
µ
µ
kM k2 = √ kY − J/kk2 ≤ √ (kY k2 + kJk2 /k) = 2µ n/k
n
n
√
and since M is of rank k, kM k∗ ≤ kkM k2 ≤ 2µ n. Therefore, the conclusion for reconstruction follows by
applying Theorem 4 together with Theorem 5.
4.4
Gaussian Mixture Clustering
Finally, we turn to the Gaussian Mixture Clustering problem, where σ : [n] → [k] is a balanced partition
i.i.d.
chosen uniformly at random, v1 , . . . , vk ∼ N (0, k/(k − 1)In,n ), and we observe the matrix
r
ρ
1
X=
S − Jm,k V † + W,
n
k
26
(55)
where W has independent standard normal entries, S is an m × k matrix with Si,t = 1σ(i)=t , and V =
[v1 , . . . , vk ].
4.4.1
First moment upper bound for Gaussian mixture clustering
In this section, we derive an upper bound on the detection and reconstruction threshold via the first moment
method. The testing procedure is again based on the generalized likelihood ratio supv,σ log P(X|v, σ)/Q(X),
which from (14) we write as
r
ρ
ρ
P(X | v, σ)
2
(S − Jm,k /k)V † F
=
hX, (S − Jm,k /k)V † i −
log
Q(X)
n
2n
r
k
k
ρX X
ρm X
=
h
xi , vs − vi −
kv` − vk22 .
n s=1
2nk s=1
i:σ(i)=s
When σ is fixed, we can optimize in v by setting the sth cluster center to
√
k n X
xi ,
vs − v = √
m ρ
i:σ(i)=s
the rescaled center of the data points xi which have been assigned to cluster s according to σ. Up to
multiplicative constants, then, the generalized likelihood ratio test is equivalent to the test based on the
statistic
2
k X
max T (σ) := max
σ
σ m
s
X
xi
.
(56)
σ(i)=s
In the null model, for any fixed σ,
T (σ) ∼ χ2nk ,
where χ2nk is the central chi-squared distribution with nk degrees of freedom.
In the planted model, let v 0 and σ0 denote the planted vectors and partition respectively, and for an
arbitrary partition σ, let ω once again be the overlap matrix between σ and σ0 . For any 1 ≤ ` ≤ k,
!
√
X
m ρX
m
√
ωs,t (vt0 − v 0 ), I .
xi ∼ N
k
k n t
σ(i)=s
For y ∼ N (µ, Id ), let χ2d (kµk2 ) denote the distribution of kyk2 , which is known as non-central chi-square
distribution with d degrees of freedom and non-centrality kµk2 . In this notation, T (σ) is distributed in P as
a non-central chi-squared random variable with nk degrees of freedom and noncentrality
k
αρ X X
ω`,s (vs0 − v 0 )
k
s
`=1
2
k
αρ X X
ω`,s ω`,t hvs0 − v 0 , vt0 − v 0 i
k
`=1 s,t
p
nαρ
2
=
kωkF − 1 + O( n log n).
k−1
=
(57)
To obtain the last line, note that the v`0 are Gaussian
√ with zero mean and variance k/(k − 1)√in each
coordinate, making hvs0 − v 0 , vt0 − v 0 i = −n/(k − 1) + O( n log n) for s 6= t and kvs0 − v 0 k2 = n + O( n log n)
with high probability.
27
We will need the following tail bounds for non-central chi-squared distributions [13, Lemma 8.1]: for
t > 0,
#
"
r
2
2
2
2
d + 2 kµk t < e−t
(58)
Pr χd kµk < d + kµk − 2
"
2
Pr χ2d kµk
2
> d + kµk + 2
r
2
d + 2 kµk
#
t + 2t < e−t
(59)
2
Notice that we can obtain central chi-square tail bounds by setting kµk = 0.
To derive the first moment bound for detectability, notice that in the planted model, when σ = σ0 up to
2
a permutation of cluster indices, kωkF = k and
p
T (σ0 ) ∼ χ2nk αnρ + O( n log n) .
√
Setting t = log n in (58), we know that with high probability T (σ0 ) > nk + nαρ − O( n log n).
In the null model, by the union bound and (59), letting t = (1+)m log k for an arbitrarily small constant
> 0,
i
h
i
h
√
√
Q max T (σ) > nk + 2 nkt + 2t = k m Pr χ2nk > nk + 2 nkt + 2t = e−Ω(m) ,
σ
Hence, with high probability, in the null model,
p
max T (σ) ≤ nk + 2 (1 + )mnk log k + 2(1 + )m log k.
σ
√
√
√
By the assumption that ρ > ρupper , i.e., ρ α > 2 k log k + 2 α log k, it follows that for sufficiently large n,
p
p
nαρ − O
n log n ≥ 2(1 + )
mnk log k + m log k ,
√
and consequently,
√ with high probability, maxσ T (σ) > nk + nαρ − O( n log n) under P, and maxσ T (σ) <
nk + nαρ − O( n log n) under Q.
To show reconstruction is possible above this bound, let σ have overlap matrix ω with σ0 and set
kωk2F = θ. We will show that, when θ is sufficiently small, there are with high probability no such partition
with likelihood as high as the planted one. In the planted model,
p
θ−1
T (σ) ∼ χ2nk nαρ
+ O( n log n) .
k−1
Taking the union bound over all partitions σ which have L2 overlap at most 1 + (k − 1) with the planted
one—of which there are no more than k m —and invoking (59) with t = (1 + )m log k, we know that with
high probability,
p
max
T
(σ)
≤
nk
+
nαρ
+
2
(1 + ) (nk + 2nαρ) m log k
2
σ:kω(σ,σ0 )kF ≤1+(k−1)
p
+ 2(1 + )m log k + O( n log n),
√
√
√
By the assumption that ρ α > 2 k log k + 2 α log k, it follows that for sufficiently large n,
p
p
nαρ(1 − ) − O
n log n ≥ 2(1 + )
(nk + 2nαρ)m log k + m log k ,
and consequently, with high probability,
max
σ:kω(σ,σ0 )k2F ≤1+(k−1)
28
T (σ) < T (σ0 ).
Let σ
bML = arg max T (σ) denote the maximum likelihood estimator of σ0 . Then with high probability,
2
kω(b
σML , σ0 )kF ≥ 1 + (k − 1), which further implies that the trace overlap satisfies T (b
σML , σ0 ) ≥ 1 + (k − 1)
in view of Lemma 2.
c of M such that
Finally, we argue that above the first moment bound, one can construct an estimator M
ck2 ] = O(n2 ) and E[hM, M
ci] = Ω(n). Intuitively, if we can estimate the planted partition better than
E[kM
F
chance, then we should be able to construct an estimator of the signal matrix which out-performs the trivial
one. Our proof uses the sample splitting method. Thinking of the rows of X as noisy observations of the
cluster centers contained in the rows of M , we will project each observation into two orthogonal subspaces,
use the first of these projections to build an estimator σ
b of the planted partition σ0 , and finally combine σ
b
with the second projection to estimate the cluster centers. This technique gains us a subtle and important
independence property: the partition we estimate based on the first projection is independent of the noise
in the second.
Let us proceed. For δ ∈ (0, 1) to be optimized later, let n1 = (1−δ)n ∈ N and denote by X1 ∈ Rm×n1 and
X2 ∈ Rm×(n−n1 ) the restrictions of the data matrix X to its first n1 and final n − n1 columns respectively;
0
define M1 and M2 analogously. We first reconstruct M1 from
√ parameters
√ ρ = (ρ/n)n1 = (1 − δ)ρ
√ X1 with
0
and α = m/n1 = α/(1 − δ). Notice that
ρ√ α > 2 k log k + 2 α log k means that we can
√ our assumption
√
choose δ sufficiently small to ensure ρ0 α0 > 2 k log k + 2 α0 log k. Let σ
b denote the ML estimator of the
2
planted partition based only on the data X1 . We have already shown that kω(b
σ , σ0 )kF ≥ 1 + (k − 1) with
high probability.
Now we use σ
b to construct an estimator of M2 . Specifically, let Sb be the m × k indicator matrix for σ
b,
b
c2 = (k/m)SbSb† X2 . Then
Sis = 1σb(i)=s , and define M
k
k
c2 i = k EhM2 , SbSb† (M2 + W2 )i (a)
EhM2 , M
=
EhM2 , SbSb† M2 i = EkSb† M2 k2F ,
m
m
m
where (a) follows because the noise W2 is independent of M2 and Sb and EW2 = 0. Furthermore,
k
k
k m2 ρ X X
EkSb† M2 k2F =
ω`,s (u0s − ū0 )
m
m k2 n
s
2
,
`=1
where u0s is the restriction of vs0 to the last δn coordinates, ū0 is the restriction of v̄ 0 to the last δn coordinates,
c2 i = Ω(n).
and ω`,s = ω(b
σ , σ0 ). In view of (57), it follows from the last two displayed equations that EhM2 , M
2
2
c
c
c
One can additionally verify that that EkM2 kF = O(n ). Finally letting M = [0m,n1 , M2 ] be the estimator,
c2 on the left with n1 zero columns, we have shown that EkM
ck2 = O(n2 ) and EhM, M
ci =
i.e., concatenating M
F
Ω(n).
4.4.2
Second moment lower bound for Gaussian mixture clustering
We first show that if ρ < ρlower , i.e., αρ2 < 2(k − 1) log(k − 1), then the second moment is bounded. Recall
that S is the m × k indicator matrix for a partition σ with Si,t = 1σ(i)=t , and V = [v1 , . . . , vk ]. Let τ be an
independent copy of σ, with indicator matrix Ti,t = 1τ (i)=t and U = [u1 , . . . , uk ] be an independent copy of
V . Applying Lemma 1,
EX∼Q
P(X)
Q(X)
2
ρ
(S − Jm,k /k)V † , (T − Jm,k /k)U †
n
αρ
= Eσ,τ Ev,u exp
hU, V (ω − J/k)i ,
k
= Eσ,τ Ev,u exp
where ω is the overlap matrix between σ and τ . The last equality follows from S † T = (m/k)ω and S † Jm,k =
p
e analogously, so that these two matrices now
(m/k)Jk,k = J†m,k T . Let Ve = (k − 1)/k V and define U
contain i.i.d standard Gaussian entries. Evaluating the moment generating function for the Gaussian random
29
e and invoking the standard linear algebra result that kABkF ≤ kAk2 kBkF , it follows that
matrix U
αρ
αρ e e
Ev,u exp
hU, V (ω − J/k) = Ev,u exp
hU , V (ω − J/k)i
k
k−1
2
α2 ρ2
e
V (ω − J/k)
= Ev exp
2(k − 1)2
F
α2 ρ2
2
2
e
≤ Ev exp
kV k2 k(ω − J/k)kF .
2(k − 1)2
In view of [48, Corollary 5.35], Ve is a ‘tall’ Gaussian random matrix with spectral norm tightly concentrated:
h
i
√
√
2
Pr kVe k2 ≤ n + k + ≤ e− /2 .
p
Since k is assumed to be fixed constant, with high probability kVe k2 ≤ (1 + )n for an arbitrarily small
constant > 0. Notice that if this event does not hold, the second moment becomes unbounded. We therefore
will compute the second moment conditioned on the high probability event that kVe k is not abnormally large.
As we discussed in §3.2, we define the event
p
F = {V : kVe k2 ≤ (1 + )n},
and conditional distributions P0 (v, σ) = P(v, σ)1F /P(F) and P0 (X) = Ev,σ∼P0 [P(X|v, σ)]. Notice that
P {F} → 1. Then the conditional second moment satisfies
2
0
αρ
1
P (X)
EX∼Q
≤ 2
Eσ,τ Ev,u exp
hU, V (ω − J/k) 1U ∈F 1V ∈F
Q(X)
P (F)
k
αρ
1
Eσ,τ Ev,u exp
hU, V (ω − J/k) 1V ∈F
≤ 2
P (F)
k
1
α2 ρ2
2
2
e
Eσ,τ Ev exp
kV k2 k(ω − J/k)kF 1V ∈F
≤ 2
P (F)
2(k − 1)2
α 2 ρ2 n
1
2
Eσ,τ exp (1 + )
kω − J/k)kF .
≤ 2
P (F)
2(k − 1)2
As in the submatrix localization problem, it remains to show that
α 2 ρ2 n
2
Eσ,τ exp (1 + )
kω
−
J/k)k
F
2(k − 1)2
(60)
is bounded by a constant for a sufficiently small . This is guaranteed if αρ2 < 1 for k = 2 and αρ2 <
2(k − 1) log(k − 1) for k > 2, in view of Lemmata 3, 4 and 5.
For reconstruction, notice that the conditioned planted model P0 is still an additive Gaussian model. Let
P (M |X) denote the posterior distribution of M given X under P0 , i.e., P0 (M |X) = P(X|M )P0 (M )/P0 (X).
Let E 0 (X) = EM ∼P0 (M |X) [M ] denote the posterior mean under P0 . Applying Theorem 4 with P0 and Q, we
obtain
h
i
1
1
1
2
2
2
EM ∼P kM kF 1F ,
lim EM,X∼P0 kM − E 0 (X)kF = lim EM ∼P0 kM kF = lim
n→∞ n
n→∞ nP(F)
n→∞ n
0
where the last equality follows from the definition of P0 . Let E(X) = EM ∼P(M |X) [M ] denote the posterior
mean under P. Then
2
2
EM,X∼P0 kM − E 0 (X)kF ≤ EM,X∼P0 kM − E(X)kF
h
i
1
2
=
EM,X∼P kM − E(X)kF 1F
P(F)
1
2
≤
EM,X∼P kM − E(X)kF ,
P(F)
30
where the first inequality holds because E 0 (X) minimizes the mean squared error under P0 ; the second
equality holds by the definition of P0 . Combining the last two displayed equations yields that
h
i
1
1
2
2
lim inf EM,X∼P kM − E(X)kF ≥ lim EM ∼P kM kF 1F .
(61)
n→∞ n
n→∞ n
Since
ρ
ρ
kM kF = k(S − Jm,k /k)V kF ≤ kS − Jm,k kF kV kF = O(kV kF ),
n
n
it follows that
i
h
4
EM ∼P kM kF = O EV [kV k4F ] = O(n2 ).
Hence,
h
2
EM ∼P kM kF
i
r
1F c ≤
!
r
h
i
h
i
4
4
c
EM ∼P kM kF P(F ) = o
EM ∼P kM kF
= o(n).
Combing the last displayed equation with (61) gives that
lim inf
n→∞
h
i
1
1
2
2
EM,X∼P kM − E(X)kF ≥ lim EM ∼P kM kF .
n→∞ n
n
2
2
Since E(X) minimizes the mean squared error under P, EM,X∼P kM − E(X)kF ≤ EM ∼P kM kF , it follows
that
i
h
1
1
2
2
lim EM,X∼P kM − E(X)kF = lim EM ∼P kM kF ,
n→∞ n
n→∞ n
2
c
and thus limn→∞ (1/n)EX∼P kE(X)kF = 0. By (21) in Theorem 4, we conclude that for any estimator M
2
c
c
with kM kF = O(n), E[hM, M i] = o(n).
4.5
Proof of Theorem 4
We give the proof for i.i.d. Gaussian noise, using a type of interpolation argument
where we vary the signal
√
to noise ratio; the proof for Wigner noise is identical. Assume that X(β) = βM + W in the planted model
and X = W in the null model, where β ∈ [0, 1] is a signal-to-noise ratio parameter (analogous to an inverse
i.i.d.
temperature) and Wij ∼ N (0, 1) for all i, j.
First recall that the Bayes-optimal estimator minimizing the mean squared error is the expectation of
the posterior distribution,
cMMSE (X) = E[M |X] ,
M
so that the (rescaled) minimum mean squared error is given by
MMSE(β) =
1
EkM − E[M |X] k2F .
n
(62)
c = 0,
We will start by proving that, for all β ∈ [0, 1], the MMSE tends to that of the trivial estimator M
lim sup MMSE(β) = β lim
n→∞
n→∞
1
EkM k2F .
n
(63)
Let us compute the mutual information I(β) between M and X:
P(X|M )
P(X)
Q(X)
P(X|M )
= EX log
+ EM,X log
P(X)
Q(X)
p
βkM k2F
= −DKL (PkQ) + EM,X
βhM, Xi −
2
β
= −DKL (PkQ) + EM kM k2F .
2
I(β) = EM,X log
31
(64)
By assumption, we have DKL (PkQ) = o(n). This holds for β = 1; by the data processing inequality for KL
divergence [45, Theorem 2.2], this holds for all β < 1 as well. Thus (64) becomes
lim
n→∞
β
1
1
I(β) =
lim E kM k2F .
n
2 n→∞ n
(65)
Next we compute the MMSE. Recall the I-MMSE formula [22],
dI(β)
n
= MMSE(β) ,
dβ
2
(66)
which can also be viewed as a classic formula in thermodynamics. Note that the MMSE is by definition
c = 0, so that for all β we have
bounded above by the squared error of the trivial estimator M
MMSE(β) ≤
1
E kM k2F .
n
(67)
Combining these we have
(a)
1
1
1
lim
E kM k2F = lim I(1)
n→∞ n
2 n→∞ n
Z 1
(b) 1
lim
MMSE(β) dβ
=
2 n→∞ 0
Z 1
(c) 1
≤
lim sup MMSE(β) dβ
2 0 n→∞
Z
1
(d) 1
1
E kM k2F dt
≤
lim
2 0 n→∞ n
1
1
=
lim
E kM k2F ,
2 n→∞ n
where (a) and (b) hold due to (65) and (66), (c) follows from the Fatou lemma, and (d) follows from (67).
Since we began and ended with the same expression, these inequalities must all be equalities. In particular,
since (c) holds with equality, we have
lim sup MMSE(β) = lim
n→∞
n→∞
1
E kM k2F
n
(68)
for almost all β ∈ [0, 1]. Since MMSE(β) is a non-increasing function of β, its limit lim supn→∞ MMSE(β) is
also non-increasing in β. Therefore, (68) holds for all β ∈ [0, 1]. This completes the proof of our claim that
the optimal estimator has the same asymptotic MMSE as the trivial one.
To show that the optimal estimator actually converges to the trivial one, we expand the definition of
MMSE(β) in (62) and subtract (68) from it. This gives
lim sup
n→∞
1
E −2hM, E[M |X]i + kE[M |X] k2F = 0 .
n
(69)
Note that EhM, E[M |X]i is the expected inner product between the ground truth and a draw from the
posterior. By the Nishimori identity [25] or the tower property of conditional expectation, this is equal to
the expected inner product between two independent draws from the posterior. By linearity of the inner
product, this gives
E hM, E[M |X]i = E hE[M |X] , E[M |X]i = E kE[M |X] k2F ,
and combining this with (69) gives (where lim sup becomes lim inf because of a sign change)
lim inf
n→∞
1
E kE[M |X] k2F = 0 .
n
32
(70)
c=M
c(X) such that EX kM
ck2 = O(n),
Furthermore, for any estimator M
F
h
i q
c
c
c
ck2 ]
EM,X hM, M i = EX hE[M |X] , M i ≤ EX kE[M |X] kF kM kF ≤ EX [kE[M |X] k2F ] EX [kM
F
and thus the desired (21) holds.
√
Finally, we note that if M is of the form (1/ n)U V † where the rows of U and V are independently and
identically distributed according to some priors, then limn→∞ MMSE(β) exists by [20, Proposition III.2],
cMMSE = E[M |X] tends
and the liminf in (20) and (21) can be replaced by lim. Then the MMSE estimator M
c = 0 as claimed.
to the trivial estimator M
4.6
Proof of Theorem 5
We give the proof of i.i.d. Gaussian noise; the proof for Wigner noise is identical. Let
Z(X) :=
h
i
2
P(X)
= EM ehM,Xi−kM kF /2 .
Q(X)
By the definition of KL divergence,
DKL (P0 kQ) − DKL (PkQ)
P(X)
P0 (X)
0
− EX∼P log
= EX∼P log
Q(X)
Q(X)
0
P (X)
P(X)
P(X)
0
0
= EX∼P log
+ EX∼P log
− EX∼P log
P(X)
Q(X)
Q(X)
≥ EX∼P0 [log Z(X)] − EX∼P [log Z(X)] ,
where the last inequality follows because DKL (P0 kP) = EX∼P0 [log(P0 (X)/P(X))] ≥ 0. Furthermore,
EX∼P0 [log Z(X)] − EX∼P [log Z(X)]
1
= EPM
EP(X|M ) [(1FM − P(FM |M )) log Z(X)]
P(FM |M )
q
1
≥ −EPM
P(FM |M ) (1 − P(FM |M )) EP(X|M ) log2 Z(X)
P(FM |M )
q
= −o(1) × EPM EP(X|M ) log2 Z(X) ,
where we use the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality in the third line, and the assumption that P(FM |M ) = 1 + o(1)
uniformly over M in the last line.
√
√
By the assumptions that kM k2 = O( n) and kM k∗ = O( n) uniformly√over all M , and in view of
hM, Xi ≤ kM k∗ kXk2 and kM k2F ≤ kM k∗ kM k2 , we have that | log Z(X)| ≤ O ( nkXk2 ) + O(n). Therefore,
EP(X|M ) log2 Z(X) = O(n2 ) + O(n) × EP(X|M ) kXk22 = O(n2 ) + O(n) × EW kM + W k22 = O(n2 ),
where the last inequality holds because EW kM + W k22 ≤ 2kM k22 + 2EW kW k22 and EW kW k22 = O(n).
Combining the last three displayed equations together yields that
DKL (P0 kQ) − DKL (PkQ) ≥ EX∼P0 [log Z(X)] − EX∼P [log Z(X)] ≥ −o(n).
Acknowledgments
We thank Yihong Wu, Lenka Zdeborová, Florent Krzakala, Thibault Lesieur, Caterina de Bacco, Alex
Russell, Andrea Montanari, and Cosma Shalizi for helpful discussions. C. Moore and J. Banks are supported
33
by the John Templeton Foundation and the ARO under contract W911NF-12-R-0012. J. Xu is supported
by Simons-Berkeley Research Fellowship. R. Vershynin is suppored by NSF Grant DMS 1265782 and U.S.
Air Force Grant FA9550-14-1-0009. Much of this work was done while the authors were visiting the Simons
Institute for the Theory of Computing.
References
[1] E. Abbe and C. Sandon. Detection in the stochastic block model with multiple clusters: proof of the
achievability conjectures, acyclic bp, and the information-computation gap. arXiv 1512.09080, Dec 2015.
[2] D. Achlioptas and F. McSherry. On spectral learning of mixtures of distributions. In Learning Theory,
pages 458–469. Springer, 2005.
[3] D. Achlioptas and A. Naor. The two possible values of the chromatic number of a random graph. Annals
of Mathematics, 162:1335–1351, 2005.
[4] D. J. Aldous. Exchangeability and related topics. In École d’été de probabilités de Saint-Flour, XIII—
1983, volume 1117 of Lecture Notes in Math., pages 1–198. Springer, Berlin, 1985.
[5] A. A. Amini and M. J. Wainwright. High-dimensional analysis of semidefinite relaxations for sparse
principal components. Ann. Statist., 37(5B):2877–2921, 10 2009.
[6] E. Arias-Castro and N. Verzelen. Community detection in dense random networks. Ann. Statist.,
42(3):940–969, 06 2014.
[7] Z. Bai and J. W. Silverstein. Spectral analysis of large dimensional random matrices. Springer Series
in Statistics. Springer, New York, second edition, 2010.
[8] J. Baik, G. Ben Arous, and S. Péché. Phase transition of the largest eigenvalue for nonnull complex
sample covariance matrices. Annals of Probability, pages 1643–1697, 2005.
[9] J. Banks, C. Moore, J. Neeman, and P. Netrapalli. Information-theoretic thresholds for community
detection in sparse networks. In Proceedings of the 29th Conference on Learning Theory, COLT 2016,
New York, NY, June 23-26 2016, pages 383–416, 2016.
[10] J. Banks, C. Moore, R. Vershynin, and J. Xu. Information-theoretic bounds and phase transitions in
clustering, sparse PCA, and submatrix localization. arXiv:1607.05222, 2016.
[11] F. Benaych-Georges and R. R. Nadakuditi. The eigenvalues and eigenvectors of finite, low rank perturbations of large random matrices. Advances in Mathematics, 227(1):494–521, 2011.
[12] Q. Berthet, P. Rigollet, et al. Optimal detection of sparse principal components in high dimension. The
Annals of Statistics, 41(4):1780–1815, 2013.
[13] L. Birgé. An alternative point of view on Lepski’s method. State of the art in probability and statistics,
pages 113–133, 2001.
[14] C. Bordenave, M. Lelarge, and L. Massoulié. Non-backtracking spectrum of random graphs: Community
detection and non-regular ramanujan graphs. In IEEE 56th Annual Symposium on Foundations of
Computer Science, FOCS, pages 1347–1357, 2015.
[15] C. Butucea and Y. I. Ingster. Detection of a sparse submatrix of a high-dimensional noisy matrix.
Bernoulli, 19(5B):2652–2688, 11 2013.
[16] T. Cai, Z. Ma, and Y. Wu. Optimal estimation and rank detection for sparse spiked covariance matrices.
Probability Theory and Related Fields, 161(3):781–815, 2015.
34
[17] Y. Chen and J. Xu. Statistical-computational tradeoffs in planted problems and submatrix localization with a growing number of clusters and submatrices. In Proceedings of ICML 2014 (Also
arXiv:1402.1267), Feb 2014.
[18] A. Decelle, F. Krzakala, C. Moore, and L. Zdeborová. Asymptotic analysis of the stochastic block model
for modular networks and its algorithmic applications. Physics Review E, 84:066106, 2011.
[19] A. Decelle, F. Krzakala, C. Moore, and L. Zdeborová. Inference and phase transitions in the detection
of modules in sparse networks. Physical Review Letters, 107(6):065701, 2011.
[20] Y. Deshpande and A. Montanari. Information-theoretically optimal sparse PCA. In Information Theory
(ISIT), 2014 IEEE International Symposium on, pages 2197–2201, June 2014.
[21] Y. Deshpande and A. Montanari. Sparse PCA via covariance thresholding. In Advances in Neural
Information Processing Systems, pages 334–342, 2014.
[22] D. Guo, S. Shamai, and S. Verdú. Mutual information and minimum mean-square error in gaussian
channels. IEEE Trans. on Information Theory, 51, 2005.
[23] B. Hajek, Y. Wu, and J. Xu. Information limits for recovering a hidden community. arXiv 1509.07859,
September 2015.
[24] B. Hajek, Y. Wu, and J. Xu. Submatrix localization via message passing. arXiv 1510.09219, October
2015.
[25] Y. Iba. The nishimori line and bayesian statistics. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General,
32(21):3875, 1999.
[26] Y. I. Ingster and I. A. Suslina. Nonparametric goodness-of-fit testing under Gaussian models. Springer,
New York, NY, 2003.
[27] E. S. P. J. Neyman. On the problem of the most efficient tests of statistical hypotheses. Philosophical
Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical
Character, 231:289–337, 1933.
[28] I. M. Johnstone and A. Y. Lu. On consistency and sparsity for principal components analysis in high
dimensions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 104(486):682–693, June 2009.
[29] R. Kannan, H. Salmasian, and S. Vempala. The spectral method for general mixture models. SIAM
Journal on Computing, 38(3):1141–1156, 2008.
[30] R. Kannan and S. Vempala. Spectral algorithms. http://www.cc.gatech.edu/ vempala/spectralbook.pdf,
2009.
[31] M. Kolar, S. Balakrishnan, A. Rinaldo, and A. Singh. Minimax localization of structural information
in large noisy matrices. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2011.
[32] R. Krauthgamer, B. Nadler, and D. Vilenchik. Do semidefinite relaxations solve sparse PCA up to the
information limit? The Annals of Statistics, 43(3):1300–1322, June 2015.
[33] F. Krzakala, C. Moore, E. Mossel, J. Neeman, A. Sly, L. Zdeborová, and P. Zhang. Spectral redemption
in clustering sparse networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(52):20935–20940,
2013.
[34] F. Krzakala, J. Xu, and L. Zdeborová. Mutual information in rank-one matrix estimation. arXiv
1603.08447, March 2016.
35
[35] M. Lelarge and L. Miolane.
arXiv:1611.03888, Nov. 2016.
Fundamental limits of symmetric low-rank matrix estimation.
[36] T. Lesieur, C. D. Bacco, J. Banks, F. Krzakala, C. Moore, and L. Zdeborová. Phase transitions and
optimal algorithms in high-dimensional gaussian mixture clustering. Arxiv preprint arxiv:1610.02918,
2016.
[37] T. Lesieur, F. Krzakala, and L. Zdeborová. MMSE of probabilistic low-rank matrix estimation: Universality with respect to the output channel. In 2015 53rd Annual Allerton Conference on Communication,
Control, and Computing (Allerton), pages 680–687, Sept 2015.
[38] T. Lesieur, F. Krzakala, and L. Zdeborová. Phase transitions in sparse PCA. In 2015 IEEE International
Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT), pages 1635–1639. IEEE, 2015.
[39] E. Mossel, J. Neeman, and A. Sly. Belief propagation, robust reconstruction and optimal recovery of
block models. In Proceedings of The 27th Conference on Learning Theory, COLT 2014, Barcelona,
Spain, June 13-15, 2014, pages 356–370, 2014.
[40] E. Mossel, J. Neeman, and A. Sly. Reconstruction and estimation in the planted partition model.
Probability Theory and Related Fields, 162(3-4):431–461, 2015.
[41] D. Paul. Asymptotics of sample eigenstructure for a large dimensional spiked covariance model. Statistica
Sinica, 17(4):1617–1642, 2007.
[42] S. Péché. The largest eigenvalue of small rank perturbations of hermitian random matrices. Probability
Theory and Related Fields, 134(1):127–173, 2006.
[43] A. Perry, A. S. Wein, and A. S. Bandeira. Statistical limits of spiked tensor models. arXiv:1612.07728,
Dec. 2016.
[44] A. Perry, A. S. Wein, A. S. Bandeira, and A. Moitra. Optimality and sub-optimality of PCA for spiked
random matrices and synchronization. arXiv:1609.05573, Sept. 2016.
[45] Y. Polyanskiy and Y. Wu. Lecture Notes on Information Theory. Feb 2015. http://www.ifp.illinois.
edu/∼yihongwu/teaching/itlectures.pdf.
[46] N. Srebro, G. Shakhnarovich, and S. Roweis. An investigation of computational and informational
limits in gaussian mixture clustering. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Machine
Learning, ICML ’06, pages 865–872, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM.
[47] S. Vempala and G. Wang. A spectral algorithm for learning mixture models. J. Comput. Syst. Sci.,
68(4):841–860, June 2004.
[48] R. Vershynin. Introduction to the non-asymptotic analysis of random matrices.
arxiv:1011.3027, 2010.
Arxiv preprint
[49] N. Verzelen and E. Arias-Castro. Community detection in sparse random networks. arXiv preprint
arXiv:1308.2955, 2013.
36
| 10math.ST
|
Targeted change detection in remote sensing
images
arXiv:1803.05482v1 [cs.CV] 14 Mar 2018
Vladimir Ignatiev1 , Alexey Trekin1 , Viktor Lobachev1 , Georgy Potapov1 , and
Evgeny Burnaev1
Skolkovo institute of Science and technology, Moscow, Nobel st. 1, Russia,
[email protected],
WWW home page: http://crei.skoltech.ru/cdise/aeronet-lab/
Abstract. Recent developments in the remote sensing systems and image processing made it possible to propose a new method of the object
classification and detection of the specific changes in the series of satellite Earth images (so called targeted change detection). In this paper
we propose a formal problem statement that allows to use effectively
the deep learning approach to analyze time-dependent series of remote
sensing images. We also introduce a new framework for the development
of deep learning models for targeted change detection and demonstrate
some cases of business applications it can be used for.
Key words: remote sensing, change detection, satellite imagery, computer vision, deep learning
1 Problem overview
Earth observation systems have been developing during the last decades in terms
of quality of the imagery and frequency of the imaging [27]. However, until now
the daily basis imagery wasnt available for any location or area of interest.
Each satellites and UAV systems have their own limitations - viz. number of
satellites, weather and daylight for optical systems, vegetation for SAR systems,
not to say the commercial ones. That lead the remote sensing industry to the
situation where the amount of the data and the proclaimed frequency of the
repeating imaging could have given us full daily coverage of the earth surface by
the high-resolution imagery [23], but in the reality it turns out to be composed
of the diverse, inconsistent and often incomplete data. And yet that business
and technology trend raise the issues how all this daily imagery can be targeted
to the specific needs and used in a various types of applications. The technical
issues that can be raised following these business needs are:
– data fusion of different types of remote sensing data coming from different
sensors (optical, SAR, different resolution etc.) - to provide the maximum
capacity of operational monitoring in any time or weather conditions [18, 19]
– detection of changes in the time series of imagery and in a very short time
spans to provide near real time valuable information related to the objects
2
Vladimir Ignatiev et al.
of interest. As the traditional approaches fail to make this massive dataflow
a reliable source of the useful answers we should propose the new machine
learning approaches that can handle it and provide the automated analysis
that can compete to the human one by accuracy
The business needs lead to the concept of the targeted change detection
(TCD) that is consolidated detection and classification of the changes in order
to obtain only the interesting for the problem (target) changes rather than all
the changes in general [25, 26].
Our motivation in this paper is to build a general description of change
detection (CD) problem taking into account characteristics of input data - series
of remote sensing (RS) images - and information about “targets” obtained from
classification of specific business applications of the respective territories such as
“transportation & logistic”, “residential areas”, “building & construction” etc.
Having formalized problem statement it is possible to develop overall framework
that will reduce costs and simplify stages of collecting data, model construction
and integration in workflow of business solutions.
1.1 Business applications of CD
Commercial services producing analytics based on series of multitemporal remote sensing images begin occupying significant share in such market areas as
smart farming [2, 3, 4], monitoring of security zones of linear objects that have
enormous transport network [9, 10, 7], monitoring of protected areas [5, 6, 8], assessment of damage caused by natural and man-made disasters [?, ?], analytical
solutions for consulting agencies in geo-marketing [12, 13].
Our survey of the commercial solutions based on analysis of RS images reveals
the following problems:
–
–
–
–
only a number of applications have algorithmic solutions;
most of solutions do not have enough accuracy;
the plenty of problems do not have any reliable solutions;
companies are in search of new frameworks that will anticipate their risks or
will make precise and timely estimation of losses.
It is obvious that each of use cases has its own demands and requirements
to the changes that should be detected. For example, if one is going to monitor
security zones of pipelines, he should find out the list of targets, changes of
which will be detected. Each target means a specific type of objects that has
the characteristic linear size and this value defines the spatial resolution of RS
images to be used. Most of real business applications requires to process with RS
images of high and very high spatial resolution from 5 cm/pixel to 10 m/pixel.
1.2 RS datasets available for CD algorithms
The idea of making general framework providing development of robust algorithms for detecting changes for the specific applied problem requires building
Targeted change detection
3
representative datasets. There are scarce datasets for change detection on RS images nowadays [14, 15, 16, 17]. Only few of existing datasets can be implemented
within the framework of targeted change detection [14, 17]. Most of them have
not enough coverage or time spread to learn and test algorithms using modern
techniques of machine learning and deep learning. So the one of the challenges
of our work is to collect and build a number of datasets dedicated to the task of
targeted CD.
1.3 Current methods and algorithms
Solutions proposed in the latest papers could be divided into several groups
according to the used models and algorithms, to market domains and to RS
images in use. Traditional methods of change detection by series of satellite
images are typically limited in several aspects:
– using just two images for justification with ground truth;
– do not take into account usability of changes in specific use case;
– only empirical approaches for selection of the appropriate RS images for real
applications;
– no automated end-to-end solutions for business cases.
One of the first applied research in this area was conducted by W.Roper and
S.Dutta [29]. They made an attempt to understand which kind of sensor system
aerial or satellite is better in a sense of probability of detection unauthorized
intrusion onto a pipeline right-of-way. The main conclusion of this work is that
one should use aerial imagery when the imaging frequency is lower than once per
month, but starting from once per day imaging frequency - probability of change
detection with satellite imagery is higher. There were used standard algorithms
of classification built-in such software packages as ENVI [28].
The future works were focused on improving change detection algorithms
themselves, but the idea of targeted CD were pushed into the background. So,
the best classical approaches are methods based on anomaly detection framework on time series of multispectral low-resolution satellite images and so called
spectral indices [34], methods based on Markov Random Fields and global optimization on graphs [35, 36, 37], approaches using object-based segmentation
with post-classification of changes [38, 39, 40] and methods based on Multivariate Alteration Detection [41, 30]. All the mentioned approaches shows quiet good
results in quality, but either use multi framed series of low resolution satellite
images or use high resolution images, but the same two pairs of images for both
training and testing.
Latest research achievements in computer vision made it possible to use deep
neural networks for accurate semantic segmentation objects on daily images. The
next step was to transfer this technology on remote sensing data. Actually, its
ongoing research. This results are the basement for development new algorithms
of CD. It can be emphasised the most successful studies in this direction. A.M.
Amin et al. [42] proposed a method for binary classification of changes based on
CNN with input two high resolution satellite images (0.65 - 2.62 m/pixel) gives
4
Vladimir Ignatiev et al.
the accuracy by Kappa coefficient - 0.876. The second approach by Y. Chu et al.
[43], based on clustering analysis of difference of two images (0.65 - 2.62 m/pixel)
uses deep belief network model with restricted Boltzmann machine architecture
shows the accuracy by Kappa coefficient from 0.905 to 0.987. The main advantage of this method that it allows to avoid radiometric correction of images, they
outperform the standard approaches and could be adopted for targeted change
detection in different use cases. Deep learning techniques need a lot of computational resources for training process and could be unstable for analysis of new
images, but the last problem may be eliminated having a representative dataset
for model training.
Further researches described in [30, 37, 45, 32, 31] give promising results, but
most of them share the same drawback: low amount of data used for the method
validation. The of creation a large and reliable dataset is one of the keys to the
development of robust and reliable algorithms for the targeted change detection.
One of the important issues is that many real problems do not need any
changes to be detected, but only the interesting, problem-specific ones. This
implies a challenging task to develop a method that could extract only the
specified classes of changes. The deep neural networks appear to be the most
promising approach to the problem, but the current solutions are highly limited
by the amount of the data available for the training of the models.
2 Remote sensing data for change detection
In order to understand the capability of the modern space imagery we need to
examine its characteristics. As stated in the previous section, according to the
target sizes we need the images in high (1-10 meters) and very high (less than
1 meter) spatial resolution. A typical high resolution satellite in 2018 has 4 or
more spectral bands and a panchromatic image of higher spatial resolution (see
table 2). A completely new approach to the data acquisition is demonstrated
by the PlanetScope satellite group, that consists of a large group of very small
satellites (3-unit CubeSat), that can acquire far more imagery than traditional
satellites of comparable mass and cost, however at the cost of less data quality:
they have less spectral bands and the noise level is higher [20].
Visible channels
Near infrared channels
SW infrared channels
Multispectral resolution, m
Panchromatic resolution, m
Daily coverage, millions sq.km/ day
SPOT-6 PlanetScope Worldview-3
4
3
6
1
0/1
2
0
0
8
6.0
3.0 / 3.7
1.24 / 3.72
1.5
0.31
3
150
0.68
Table 1. Overview of the technical specifications of the modern RS satellites
Targeted change detection
5
Let us call a set of images taken by one space or aerial instrument at one flight
and covering the same territory a “multi-layer image”. We need this term do
differentiate from the multispectral image where each layer represents a spectral
band and the panchromatic layer is not included into the multispectral image. In
our case we add it as well as any other information represented in a raster form
as a layer to our image representation, as we want to collect all the information
within a single instance of a multi-layer image.
I = I1 , ..., IC is a multi-layer image with C bands (channels). Every band Ii
is a single 2-dimensional matrix with the size (Xi , Yi ). Different bands can have
different spatial resolution so, under the condition that all the bands must cover
the same territory, the sizes of the channels are different, but proportional by an
integer ratio. If we order the bands by the decrease of the size, their dimensions
will be Xi /Xi + 1 = Yi /Yi+1 ∈ N
For the task of change detection the images are organized in time series:
S = I 1 , ...I T , where each image I t , t = 1...T covers the same area, but different
images can be obtained by different instruments and have different characteristics. We intentionally put this restriction on the area, because we need not to
describe all the data available, but to construct the datasets that can be used by
the data analysis methods within the proposed framework. If the given data are
not fully spatially consistent, we can crop the extents and, if needed, divide the
time series into several separate ones of different spatial and temporal extent.
3 Proposed framework
This section discusses details of proposed framework and shows the example
of methods for targeted change detection in classical situation when two input
satellite images are used for classification of one type of changes.
3.1 Problem statement
Given the series of images S = I 1 , ...I T where each image I t is a multi-layer
image taken at the moment of time t, a parameterized description of changes
occurred in the series can be introduced as C = F (S). The exact definition of
the operator F is done at the post-processing stage and is beyond the scope of
this paper. It is assumed that the calculation of the vector C will use only the
set of objects of pair-wise changes {rij }, so the problem goal can be reduced to
the search of rij - the change between the images I i and I j . The pair change
object definition includes:
– Category of detected changes;
– The set of polygonal domains (in physical coordinates) where the changes are
detected.
Evaluation of the detected change is done with one of the measures:
– Intersection over Union;
6
Vladimir Ignatiev et al.
– The pair Recall-Precision;
– F1-measure.
All three measures assume availability of the ground truth changes for the investigated pair of images. Each measure can be calculated either per unit area
or per object; the latter is specified heuristically.
3.2 Description of the framework for TCD applications
Our framework is restricted neither by the type of remote sensing data, nor methods, algorithms, but it does take into account information about the “targets”
of the applied area.
The question of determining the context of using the notion “change” is
removed by establishing a one-to-one correspondence of the model or algorithm
for detecting changes and the business case to be solved. Robustness of the
created algorithms is guaranteed by creating reference sets of markup of changes
for a series of different images and applying modern methods of in-depth training
on data generated from reference sets.
As one can see on the scheme depicted on the figure 1 there are three stages
in proposed framework: preparing dataset, training a model and analyzing series
of images for pair-wise targeted change detection. Dataset for specific business
application should be constructed in accordance with the formal mathematical
problem statement described above. It means that one should load series of
images concerning the size of targets, the characteristic time period of occurrence
of changes, type of images and so on. This data are combined with external markups of changes of objects (targets) under consumption. The model for pair-wise
targeted change detection is chosen from the set of neural networks architectures
prepared in advance and is trained and validated on the dataset built of the
first stage. The process of analyzing new series of images starts from building
map of changes for each pair of images inside the series. After that there is a
post-processing and verification procedures that resulted in recommendation,
forecasts or alerting reports with detected changes, that can be visualized in
interactive mode.
3.3 Method of TCD based on deep learning techniques
Our method is fundamentally different from all the methods listed in section
1.3 because it takes into account information about targets of the application
under consumption, is based on deep neural network trained and validated on
representative dataset, can be automatically adopted to a new territory.
The approach we are developing is based on a specific architecture of the
convolutional network which has had a great success in solving the semantic
segmentation problems. In the mathematical problem statement, a general formal description of the detected changes is introduced for a pair of images; the
description being applied to all datasets analyzed. The neural network architecture makes it possible to use the pre-trained parameters of the network and
adapt it to new datasets with an additional training at a very little expense.
Targeted change detection
Fig. 1. Scheme of the proposed framework
7
8
Vladimir Ignatiev et al.
The technique can be applied to all pairs of the images in the series; the
post-processing is then used to build a more common object that describes the
image evolution within the series. The post-processing can be specific for each
business application and does not depend on the deep learning technique used
at the early stages of analysis.
4 Conclusion
In this paper we have summarized the knowledge about the business applications
of change detection, known methods of the image processing and deep learning
and the possibilities and limitations of the RS data to propose a generalized
framework that can embed the solutions for different problems in the area of
the targeted change detection in the remote sensing data. The proposed framework to be implemented in our future research will facilitate the integration of
the current and future data sources and the advanced algorithms of the data
processing.
References
1. PlanetScope Flock, http://space.skyrocket.de/doc sdat/flock-1.htm
2. Gamaya, https://gamaya.com/
3. DigitalGlobe Services, https://www.digitalglobe.com/industries/agriculture
4. Exact Farming, www.exactfarming.com
5. Sovzond, https://sovzond.ru/
6. Unmanned Systems, http://unmanned.ru/en/
7. Orbital Eye - PIMSyS, https://orbitaleye.nl
8. Zala Aero Group, http://zala.aero/
9. I-Cubed, http://www.i3.com/
10. Satellite Imaging Corporation, www.satimagingcorp.com
11. European Space Agency, http://www.esa.int/ESA
12. OOO Rilos, https://geomatrix-retail.com/
13. Geomarketing & Location Intelligence, https://www.gim.be/en/productsservices/gim-expertise/geomarketing-location-intelligence
14. Bourdis, N., Marraud, D., & Sahbi, H. (2011, July). Constrained optical flow
for aerial image change detection. In Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium
(IGARSS), 2011 IEEE International (pp. 4176-4179). IEEE.
15. SAR Change Detection Dataset, http://fenggao.sinaapp.com/san dataset.html
16. Google Earth Engine, https://earthengine.google.com/datasets/
17. CDnet, http://www.changedetection.net/
18. Dong, J., Zhuang, D., Huang, Y., & Fu, J. (2009). Advances in multi-sensor data
fusion: Algorithms and applications. Sensors, 9(10), 7771-7784.
19. Zhang, J. (2010). Multi-source remote sensing data fusion: status and trends. International Journal of Image and Data Fusion, 1(1), 5-24.
20. Santilli, G., Vendittozzi, C., Cappelletti, C., Battistini, S., & Gessini, P. (2018).
CubeSat constellations for disaster management in remote areas. Acta Astronautica.
Targeted change detection
9
21. https://www.intelligence-airbusds.com/files/pmedia/public/r2928 9 int 012 spot67 en low-2.pdf
22. http://worldview3.digitalglobe.com/
23. https://www.planet.com/products/satelliteimagery/files/Planet Combined Imagery Product Specs December2017.pdf
24. https://qz.com/1126301/the-company-photographing-every-spot-of-land-onearth-every-single-day/
25. Fernndez-Prieto, D., & Marconcini, M. (2011). A novel partially supervised approach to targeted change detection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote
Sensing, 49(12), 5016-5038.
26. Ye, S., Chen, D., & Yu, J. (2016). A targeted change-detection procedure by combining change vector analysis and post-classification approach. ISPRS Journal of
Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 114, 115-124.
27. Toth, C., & Jkw, G. (2016). Remote sensing platforms and sensors: A survey.
ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 115, 22-36.
28. ENVI software, https://www.harris.com/solution/envi
29. Roper, W., & Dutta, S. (2005). Oil spill and pipeline condition assessment using
remote sensing and data visualization management systems. In: 2005 ESRI User
Conference Proceedings, San Diego, California, pp. 1-25.
30. Wang, B., Choi, J., Choi, S., Lee, S., Wu, P., & Gao, Y. (2017). Image Fusion-Based
Land Cover Change Detection Using Multi-Temporal High-Resolution Satellite Images. Remote Sensing, 9(8), 804.
31. Huang, S., Ramirez, C., Kennedy, K., Mallory, J., Wang, J., & Chu, C. (2017).
Updating land cover automatically based on change detection using satellite images:
case study of national forests in Southern California. GIScience & Remote Sensing,
54(4), 495-514.
32. Mcdermid, G. J., Pape, A., Chubey, M. S., & Franklin, S. E. (2003, October).
Object-oriented analysis for change detection. In Proceedings of the 25th Canadian
symposium on remote sensing, Montral, Canada (pp. 14-17).
33. Almutairi, A., & Warner, T. A. (2010). Change detection accuracy and image
properties: a study using simulated data. Remote Sensing, 2(6), 1508-1529.
34. Cai S., & Liu, D. (2015). Detecting Change Dates from Dense Satellite Time Series
Using a Sub-Annual Change Detection Algorithm. Remote Sensing, 7, 8705-8727.
doi:10.3390/rs70708705.
35. Vakalopoulou, M., Karantzalos, K., Komodakis, N., & Paragios, N. (2015). Simultaneous registration and change detection in multitemporal, very high resolution
remote sensing data. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision
and Pattern Recognition Workshops (pp. 61-69).
36. Yu, H., Yang, W., Hua, G., Ru, H., & Huang, P. (2017). Change Detection Using
High Resolution Remote Sensing Images Based on Active Learning and Markov
Random Fields. Remote Sensing, 9(12), 1233.
37. Gu, W., Lv, Z., & Hao, M. (2017). Change detection method for remote sensing
images based on an improved Markov random field. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 76(17), 17719-17734.
38. Jianya, G., Haigang, S., Guorui, M., & Qiming, Z. (2008). A review of multitemporal remote sensing data change detection algorithms. The International
Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences,
37(B7), 757-762.
39. Huang, L., Fang, Y., Zuo, X., & Yu, X. (2015). Automatic change detection method
of multitemporal remote sensing images based on 2D-Otsu algorithm improved by
firefly algorithm. Journal of Sensors, 2015.
10
Vladimir Ignatiev et al.
40. Vittek, M., Brink, A., Donnay, F., Simonetti, D., & Descle, B. Land cover change
monitoring using Landsat MSS/TM satellite image data over west africa between
1975 and 1990. Remote Sensing 2014; 6 (1): 658-676.
41. Jabari, S., & Zhang, Y. (2016, April). Building change detection using multi-sensor
and multi-view-angle imagery. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental
Science (Vol. 34, No. 1, p. 12-18). IOP Publishing.
42. El Amin, A. M., Liu, Q., & Wang, Y. (2016, July). Convolutional neural network
features based change detection in satellite images. In First International Workshop
on Pattern Recognition (Vol. 10011, p. 100110W). International Society for Optics
and Photonics.
43. Chu, Y., Cao, G., & Hayat, H. (2016). Change Detection of Remote Sensing Image
Based on Deep Neural Networks.
44. Lyu, H., Lu, H., & Mou, L. (2016). Learning a transferable change rule from a
recurrent neural network for land cover change detection. Remote Sensing, 8(6),
506.
45. Sakurada, K., Okatani, T., & Deguchi, K. (2013, June). Detecting changes in 3D
structure of a scene from multi-view images captured by a vehicle-mounted camera.
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2013 IEEE Conference on
(pp. 137-144). IEEE.
| 5cs.CE
|
SCNN: An Accelerator for Compressed-sparse
Convolutional Neural Networks
Angshuman Parashar†
Anurag Mukkara‡
Antonio Puglielli∗
Joel Emer†‡
arXiv:1708.04485v1 [cs.NE] 23 May 2017
NVIDIA†
Minsoo Rhu†
Rangharajan Venkatesan†
Stephen W. Keckler†
Massachusetts Institute of Technology‡
Abstract—Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have
emerged as a fundamental technology for machine learning.
High performance and extreme energy efficiency are critical for
deployments of CNNs in a wide range of situations, especially
mobile platforms such as autonomous vehicles, cameras, and
electronic personal assistants. This paper introduces the Sparse
CNN (SCNN) accelerator architecture, which improves performance and energy efficiency by exploiting the zero-valued weights
that stem from network pruning during training and zero-valued
activations that arise from the common ReLU operator applied
during inference. Specifically, SCNN employs a novel dataflow
that enables maintaining the sparse weights and activations
in a compressed encoding, which eliminates unnecessary data
transfers and reduces storage requirements. Furthermore, the
SCNN dataflow facilitates efficient delivery of those weights and
activations to the multiplier array, where they are extensively
reused. In addition, the accumulation of multiplication products
are performed in a novel accumulator array. Our results show
that on contemporary neural networks, SCNN can improve both
performance and energy by a factor of 2.7× and 2.3×, respectively, over a comparably provisioned dense CNN accelerator.
I. I NTRODUCTION
Driven by the availability of massive data and the computational capability to process it, deep learning has recently
emerged as a critical tool for solving complex problems across
a wide range of domains, including image recognition [20],
speech processing [12], [16], [2], natural language processing [8], language translation [10], and autonomous vehicles [21]. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have become
the most popular algorithmic approach for deep learning for
many of these domains. Employing CNNs can be decomposed
into two tasks: (1) training — in which the parameters of a
neural network are learned by observing massive numbers of
training examples, and (2) inference — in which a trained
neural network is deployed in the field and classifies the
A version appears in the 44th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on
Computer Architecture (ISCA-44), 2017.
This research was, in part, funded by the U.S. Government, under the
DARPA CRAFT program. The views and conclusions contained in this
document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as
representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the U.S.
Government.
Brucek Khailany†
William J. Dally†
UC-Berkeley∗
Stanford University
observed data. Today, training is often done on GPUs [24]
or farms of GPUs, while inference depends on the application
and can employ CPUs, GPUs, FPGA, or specially-built ASICs.
During the training process, a deep learning expert will
typically architect the network, establishing the number of
layers, the operation performed by each layer, and the connectivity between layers. Many layers have parameters, typically
filter weights, which determine their exact computation. The
objective of the training process is to learn these weights,
usually via a stochastic gradient descent-based excursion
through the space of weights. This process typically employs
a forward-propagation calculation for each training example,
a measurement of the error between the computed and desired output, and then back-propagation through the network
to update the weights. Inference has similarities, but only
includes the forward-propagation calculation. Nonetheless, the
computation requirements for inference can be prohibitively
large, particularly with the emergence of deeper networks
(hundreds of layers [17], [18], [26], [29]) and larger inputs
sets, such as high-definition video. Furthermore, the energy
efficiency of this computation is important, especially for
mobile platforms, such as autonomous vehicles, cameras, and
electronic personal assistants.
Recent published works have shown that common networks
have significant redundancy and can be pruned dramatically
during training without substantively affecting accuracy [15].
Our experience shows that the number of weights that can
be eliminated varies widely across the layers but typically
ranges from 20% to 80% [15], [14]. Eliminating weights
results in a network with a substantial number of zero values,
which can potentially reduce the computational requirements
of inference.
The inference computation also offers a further optimization
opportunity. In specific, many networks employ as their nonlinear operator the ReLU (rectified linear unit) function which
clamps all negative activation values to zero. The activations
are the output values of an individual layer that are passed
as inputs to the next layer. Our experience shows that for
typical data sets, 50–70% of the activations are clamped to
zero. Since the multiplication of weights and activations is the
key computation for inference, the combination of these two
factors can reduce the amount of computation required by over
an order of magnitude. Additional benefits can be achieved by
a compressed encoding for zero weights and activations, thus
allowing more to fit in on-chip RAM and eliminating energycostly DRAM accesses.
In this paper, we introduce the Sparse CNN (SCNN) accelerator architecture, a new CNN inference architecture that
exploits both weight and activation sparsity to improve both
performance and power. Previous works have employed techniques for exploiting sparsity, including saving computation
energy for zero-valued activations and compressing weights
and activations stored in DRAM [7], [6]. Other works have
used a compressed encoding of activations [1] or weights [30]
in parts of their dataflow to reduce data transfer bandwidth
and save time for computations of some multiplications with
a zero operand. While these prior architectures have largely
focused on eliminating computations and exploiting some
data compression, SCNN couples an algorithmic dataflow
that eliminates all multiplications with a zero operand while
employing a compressed representation of both weights and
activations through almost the entire computation.
At the heart of the SCNN design is a processing element
(PE) with a multiplier array that accepts a vector of weights
and a vector of activations. Unlike previous convolutional
dataflows [5], [11], [7], [25], the SCNN dataflow only delivers
weights and activations to the multiplier array that can all
be multiplied by one another in the manner of a Cartesian
product. Furthermore, the activation vectors are reused in
an input stationary [6] fashion against a number of weight
vectors to reduce data accesses. Finally, only non-zero weights
and activations are fetched from the input storage arrays and
delivered to the multiplier array. As with any CNN accelerator,
SCNN must accumulate the partial products generated by the
multipliers. However, since the products generated by the multiplier array cannot be directly summed together, SCNN tracks
the output coordinates associated with each multiplication and
sends the coordinate and product to a scatter accumulator array
for summing.
To increase parallelism beyond a single PE, multiple PEs
can be run in parallel with each working on a disjoint 3D tile
of input activations. Because of the end-to-end compression
of activations, SCNN can keep the both the input and output
activations of each tile local to its PE, further reducing energyhungry data transmission. Overall, this results in a design with
efficient compressed storage and delivery of input operands,
high reuse of the input operands in the multiplier array, and
that spends no time on multiplications with zero operands.
To evaluate SCNN, we developed a cycle-level performance
model and a validated analytical model that allows us to
quickly explore the design space of different types of accelerators. We also implemented an SCNN PE in synthesizable
System C and compiled the design into gates using a combination of commercial high-level synthesis (HLS) tools and a traditional verilog compiler. Our results show that 64 PE SCNN
implementation with 16 multipliers per PE (1024 multipliers
in total) can be implemented in approximately 7.9mm2 , which
TABLE I
N ETWORK CHARACTERISTICS . W EIGHTS AND ACTIVATIONS ASSUME A
DATA - TYPE SIZE OF TWO BYTES .
# Conv. Max. Layer Max. Layer Total #
Network
Layers
Weights
Activations Multiplies
AlexNet [20]
5
1.73 MB
0.31 MB
0.69 B
GoogLeNet [28]
54
1.32 MB
1.52 MB
1.1 B
VGGNet [27]
13
4.49 MB
6.12 MB
15.3 B
is somewhat larger than an equivalently provisioned dense
accelerator architecture due to the overheads of managing the
sparse dataflow. On a range of networks, SCNN provides a
factor of 2.7× speedup and a 2.3× energy reduction relative
to the dense architecture.
II. M OTIVATION
Convolutional Neural Network algorithms (CNNs) are essentially a cascaded set of pattern recognition filters trained
with supervision [21]. A CNN consists of a series of layers,
which include convolutional layers, non-linear scalar operator
layers, and layers that downsample the intermediate data, for
example by pooling. The convolutional layers represent the
core of the CNN computation and are characterized by a
set of filters that are usually 1×1 or 3×3, and occasionally
5×5 or larger. The values of these filters are the weights that
are trained using a training set for the network. Some deep
neural networks (DNNs) also include fully-connected layers,
typically toward the end of the DNN. During inference, a
new image (in the case of image recognition) is presented
to the network, which classifies into the training categories by
computing in succession each of the layers in the network. The
intermediate data between the layers are called activations and
the output activation of one layer becomes the input activation
of the next layer. In this paper, we focus on accelerating the
convolutional layers as they constitute the majority of the
computation [9].
Table II lists the attributes of three commonly used networks
in image processing: AlexNet [20], GoogLeNet [28], and
VGGNet [27], whose specifications come from the Caffe
BVLC Model Zoo [4]. The increasing layer depth across the
networks represents the successively more accurate networks
in the ImageNet [19] competition. The Maximum Weights and
Activations columns indicate the size of the largest weight and
activation matrices across the layer of the network. The last
column lists the total number of multiplies required to compute
a single inference pass through all of the convolutional layers
of the network. These data and computational requirements
are derived from the standard ImageNet inputs images of
224 × 224 pixels. Processing larger, higher resolution images
will result in greater computational and data requirements.
Sparsity in CNNs. Sparsity in a layer of a CNN is
defined as the fraction of zeros in the layer’s weight and
input activation matrices. The primary technique for creating
weight sparsity is to prune the network during training. Han,
et al. developed a pruning algorithm that operates in two
2
Density (IA)
Density (W)
Work (# of multiplies)
Density (IA, W)
1
0.8
1
0.8
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
0
Work (# of multiplies)
phases [15]. First, any weight with an absolute value that
is close to zero (e.g. below a defined threshold) is set to
zero. This process has the effect of removing weights from
the filters, and sometimes even forcing an output activation to
always to be zero. Second, the remaining network is retrained,
to regain the accuracy lost through naı̈ve pruning. The result
is a smaller network with accuracy extremely close to the
original network. The process can be iteratively repeated to
reduce network size while maintaining accuracy.
Activation sparsity occurs dynamically during inference and
is highly dependent on the data being processed. Specifically,
the rectified linear unit (ReLU) function that is commonly
used as the non-linear operator in CNNs forces all negatively
valued activations to be clamped to zero. After completing
computation of a convolutional layer, a ReLU function is
applied point-wise to each element in the output activation
matrices before the data is passed to the next layer.
To measure the weight and activation sparsity, we used the
Caffe framework [3] to prune and train the three networks
listed in Table II, using the pruning algorithm of [15]. We then
instrumented the Caffe framework to inspect the activations
between the convolutional layers. Figure 1 shows the weight
and activation density (fraction of non-zeros or complement of
sparsity) of the layers of the networks, referenced to the lefthand y-axes. As GoogLeNet has 54 convolutional layers, we
only show a subset of representative layers. The data shows
that weight density varies across both layers and networks,
reaching a minimum of 30% for some of the GoogLeNet
layers. Activation density also varies, with density typically
being higher in early layers. Activation density can be as
low as 30% as well. The triangles shows the ideal amount of
work (measured in multiplies of non-zero values) that could be
achieved through maximum exploitation of sparsity by taking
the product of the weight and activation densities on a perlayer basis. Typical layers can reduce work by a factor of 4,
and can reach as high as a factor of ten.
Exploiting sparsity. Since multiplication by zero just results in a zero, it should require no work. In addition, that
zero will contribute nothing to the partial sum it is part of,
so the addition is unnecessary as well. Furthermore, data with
many zeros can be represented in a compressed form. Together
these characteristics provide a number of opportunities for
optimization:
• Compressing data: Encoding the sparse weights and/or
activations provides an architecture an opportunity to
reduce the amount of data that must be moved throughout
the memory hierarchy. It also reduces the data footprint,
which allows larger matrices to be held a given size
storage structure.
• Eliminating computation: For multiplications that have
a zero weight and/or activation operand, the operation
can be data gated or the operands might never be sent to
the multiplier. This can save energy consumption or both
time and energy consumption, respectively.
Our SCNN architecture exploits both these opportunities.
First, it employs a dense encoding of sparse weights and
0
conv1
conv2
conv3
conv4
conv5
(a) AlexNet
Density (W)
0.8
Density (IA, W)
1
Density (IA)
0.8
Work (# of multiplies)
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
inception_3a
5x5
5x5_reduce
3x3
3x3_reduce
1x1
pool_proj
5x5
3x3
5x5_reduce
1x1
3x3_reduce
0
pool_proj
0
Work (# of multiplies)
1
inception_5b
(b) GoogLeNet
Density (IA, W)
0.8
1
0.8
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
0
0
Work (# of multiplies)
Density (IA)
Density (W)
Work (# of multiplies)
1
(c) VGGNet
Fig. 1. Input activation and weight density and the reduction in the amount
of work achievable by maximally exploiting sparsity.
activations. Second, it uses a novel dataflow that delivers
only those densely encoded weights and activations to the
multipliers.
III. SCNN DATAFLOW
The core operation in a CNN convolutional layer is a 2dimensional sliding-window convolution of an R × S element
filter over a W ×H element input activation plane to produce a
W × H element output activation plane. There can be multiple
(C) input activation planes, which are referred to as input
channels. A distinct filter is applied to each input activation
channel, and the filter output for each of the C channels
are accumulated together element-wise into a single output
activation plane. Multiple filters (K) can be applied to the
same body of input activations to produce K output channels
of activations. Finally, a batch of length N of groups of C
channels of input activation planes can be applied to the same
volume of filter weights. Figure 2 shows these parameters
applied to the computation of a single CNN layer.
The set of computations for the complete layer can be
formulated as a loop nest over these 7 variables. Because
3
for n = 1 to N
for k = 1 to K
for c = 1 to C
for w = 1 to W
for h = 1 to H
for r = 1 to R
for s = 1 to S
out[n][k][w][h] +=
in[n][c][w+r-1][h+s-1] *
filter[k][c][r][s];
7-dimensional network layer
C
Weights
Inputs
K
Outputs
S
H
K
C
H-S+1
R
C
W
.
.
.
N
W-R+1
.
.
.
N
1
Fig. 3. 7-dimensional CNN loop nest.
Fig. 2. CNN computations and parameters.
each of the the K output channels (a K × R × S subvolume).
Thus each input activation will contribute to a volume of
K × R × S output activations. This order maximizes the reuse
of the input activations, while paying a cost to stream the
weights to the computation units. Accommodating multiple
input channels (C) adds an additional outer loop and results
in the loop nest C → W → H → K → R → S.
The PT-IS-CP-dense dataflow requires input buffers for
weights and input activations, and a accumulator buffer to store
the partial sums of the output activations. The accumulator
buffer must perform a read-add-write operation for every
access to a previously-written index. We call this accumulator
buffer along with the attached adder an accumulation unit.
Parameters of contemporary networks cause these buffers to
be large and energy-expensive to access. The input-stationary
temporal loop nest amortizes the energy cost of accessing
the input buffer over multiple weight and accumulator buffer
accesses. More precisely, the register in which the stationary
input is held over K × R × S iterations serves as an inner buffer
filtering accesses to the larger input buffer.
Unfortunately, the stationarity of input activations comes at
the cost of more streaming accesses to the weights and partial
sums (in the accumulator buffer). Blocking the weights and
partial sums in the output channel (K) dimension can increase
reuse of these data structures and improve energy efficiency.
We factor the output channel variable (K) into Kc (which we
call a output-channel group) and K/Kc , and only store weights
and outputs for a single output-channel group at a time inside
the weight and accumulator buffers. Thus the subvolumes that
are housed in buffers at the computation unit are:
• Weights: C × Kc × R × S
• Inputs: C ×W × H
• Partial Sums: Kc ×W × H
An outer loop over all the K/Kc output-channel chunks
results in the complete loop nest K/Kc → C → W → H → Kc →
R → S. Note that each iteration of this outer loop will require
the weight buffer to be refilled and the accumulator buffer
must be drained and cleared, while the contents of the input
buffer will be fully reused because the same input activations
are used across all output channels.
Intra-PE parallelism. To exploit the parallelism of many
multipliers within a PE, we fetch a vector of F filter-weights
multiply-add operations are associative (modulo rounding errors, which we will ignore in this study), all permutations of
these 7 loop variables are legal. Figure 3 shows an example
loop nest based on one such permutation. We can concisely
describe this nest as N → K → C → W → H → R → S. Each
point in the 7-dimensional space formed from these variables
represents a single multiply-accumulate operation. Note that
for the remainder of this paper, we assume a batch size of 1,
which is common for inferencing tasks.
This simple loop nest can be transformed in numerous
ways to capture different reuse patterns of the activations
and weights and to map the computation to a hardware
accelerator implementation. A CNN’s dataflow defines how
the loops are ordered, partitioned, and parallelized [6]. Prior
work[6] has shown that the choice of dataflow has a significant
impact on the area and energy-efficiency of an architecture.
In fact, the choice of dataflow is perhaps the single most
significant differentiator between many prior works on CNN
architectures.
While the concept of dataflow has been studied for dense
architectures, sparse architectures can also employ various
alternative dataflows, each with its own set of trade-offs. While
an exhaustive enumeration of sparse dataflows is beyond the
scope of this paper, we present a specific dataflow called
PlanarTiled-InputStationary-CartesianProduct-sparse (or PTIS-CP-sparse). After examining a range of different dataflows,
we selected PT-IS-CP-sparse because it enables reuse patterns that exploit the characteristics of sparse weights and
activations. This section first presents an equivalent dense
dataflow (PT-IS-CP-dense) to explain the decomposition of the
computations and then adds the specific features for PT-IS-CPsparse .
A. The PT-IS-CP-dense Dataflow
Single-multiplier temporal dataflow. To understand the
temporal component of the PT-IS-CP-dense dataflow, consider
the operation of a processing element (or PE) with a single
multiply-accumulate unit. The dataflow employs an inputstationary computation order in which an input activation is
held stationary at the computation units as it is multiplied by
all the filter weights needed to make all its contributions to
4
from the weight buffer and a vector of I inputs from the input
activation buffer. These values are delivered to an array of
F×I multipliers to compute a full Cartesian product of output
partial-sums. Each product yields a useful partial sum such that
no extraneous fetches or computations are performed. PT-ISCP-sparse will exploit this same property to make computation
efficient on compressed-sparse weights and input activations.
(A)
(B)
(C)
The multiplier outputs are sent to the accumulation unit,
which updates the partial sums of the output activation.
Each multiplier output is accumulated with a partial sum
at the matching output coordinates in the output activation
space. These coordinates are computed in parallel with the
multiplications. The accumulation unit must employ at least
F×I adders to match the throughput of the multipliers. Figure 4 shows pseudo-code for the PT-IS-CP-dense dataflow,
including blocking in the K dimension (A,C), fetching vectors
of input activations and weights (B,D), and computing the
Cartesian product in parallel (E,F). The Kcoord(), Xcoord(),
and Y coord() functions compute the k, x, and y coordinates
of the uncompressed output volume using a de-linearization
of the temporal loop indices a and w, the spatial loop indices
i and f , and the known filter width and height. Note that this
dataflow is simply a reordered, partitioned and parallelized
version of Figure 3.
(D)
(E)
(F)
Fig. 4. PT-IS-CP-dense dataflow.
B. PT-IS-CP-sparse Dataflow
PT-IS-CP-sparse is a natural extension of PT-IS-CP-dense
that exploits sparsity in the weights and input activations. The
dataflow is specifically designed to operate on compressedsparse encodings of the weights and input activations and to
produce a compressed-sparse encoding of the output activations. At a CNN layer boundary, the output activations of
the previous layer become the input activations of the next
layer. While prior work has proposed a number of compressedsparse representations [13], [1], [30], the specific format used
is orthogonal to the sparse architecture itself. What is key is
that decoding a sparse format ultimately yields a non-zero data
value and an index indicating the coordinates of the value in
the weight or input activation matrices.
To facilitate easier decoding of the compressed-sparse
blocks, weights are grouped into compressed-sparse blocks at
the granularity of an output-channel group, with of Kc ×R×S
weights encoded into one compressed block. Likewise, input
activations are encoded at the granularity of input channels,
with a block of Wt ×Ht encoded into one compressed block.
At each access, the weight buffer delivers a vector of F nonzero filter weights along with each of their coordinates within
the Kc ×R×S region. Similarly, the input buffer delivers a
vector of F non-zero input activations along with each of
their coordinates within the Wt ×Ht region. Similar to the dense
dataflow, the multiplier array computes the full cross-product
of F×I partial sum outputs, with no extraneous computations.
Unlike a dense architecture, output coordinates are not derived
from loop indices in a state machine but from the coordinates
of non-zero values embedded in the compressed format.
Even though calculating output coordinates is trivial, the
multiplier outputs are not typically contiguous as they are in
PT-IS-CP-dense. Thus the F×I multiplier outputs must be
Inter-PE parallelism. To scale beyond the practical limits
of multiplier count and buffer sizes within a PE, we employ
a tiling strategy to spread the work across an array of PEs
so that each PE can operate independently. PT-IS-CP-dense
partitions the W ×H element activation plane into smaller
Wt ×Ht element tiles that are distributed across the PEs. Each
tile extends fully into the input-channel dimension C, resulting
in an input-activation volume of C×Wt ×Ht assigned to each
PE. Weights are broadcast to the PEs and each PE operates
on its own subset of the input and output activation space.
Unfortunately, strictly partitioning both input and output
activations into Wt ×Ht tiles does not work because the slidingwindow nature of the convolution operation introduces crosstile dependencies at tile edges. These dependencies are called
halos. Halos can be resolved in two ways:
•
•
BUFFER wt_buf[C][Kc*R*S/F][F];
BUFFER in_buf[C][Wt*Ht/I][I];
BUFFER acc_buf[Kc][Wt+R-1][Ht+S-1];
BUFFER out_buf[K/Kc][Kc*Wt*Ht];
for k’ = 0 to K/Kc-1
{
for c = 0 to C-1
for a = 0 to (Wt*Ht/I)-1
{
in[0:I-1] = in_buf[c][a][0:I-1];
for w = 0 to (Kc*R*S/F)-1
{
wt[0:F-1] = wt_buf[c][w][0:F-1];
parallel_for (i=0 to I-1) x (f=0 to F-1)
{
k = Kcoord(w,f);
x = Xcoord(a,i,w,f);
y = Ycoord(a,i,w,f);
acc_buf[k][x][y] += in[i]*wt[f];
}
}
}
out_buf[k’][0:Kc*Wt*Ht-1] =
acc_buf[0:Kc-1][0:Wt-1][0:Ht-1];
}
Input halos: The input buffers at each PE are sized to be
slightly larger than C ×Wt ×Ht to accommodate the halos.
These halo input values are replicated across adjacent
PEs, but outputs are strictly private to each PE. Replicated
input values can be multicast when they are being fetched
into the buffers.
Output halos: The output buffers at each PE are sized to
be slightly larger than Kc ×Wt × Ht to accommodate the
halos. The halos now contain incomplete partial sums that
must be communicated to neighbor PEs for accumulation.
This communication occurs at the end of computing each
output-channel group.
Our PT-IS-CP-dense dataflow uses output halos, though the
efficiency difference between the two approaches is minimal.
5
scattered to discontiguous addresses within the Kc ×Wt ×Ht
output range. Because any value in the output range can be
non-zero, the accumulation buffer must be kept in a dense
format. In fact, output activations will probabilistically have
high density even with a very low density of weights and input
activations, until they pass through a ReLU operation.
To accommodate the needs of accumulation of sparse partial
sums, we modify the monolithic Kc ×Wt ×Ht accumulation
buffer from the PT-IS-CP-dense dataflow into a distributed
array of smaller accumulation buffers accessed via a scatter
network which can be implemented as a crossbar switch. The
scatter network routes an array of F×I partial sums to an array
of A accumulator banks based on the output index associated
with each partial sum. Taken together, the complete accumulator array still maps the same Kc ×Wt ×Ht address range, though
the address space is now split across a distributed set of banks.
PT-IS-CP-sparse can be implemented via small adjustments
of Figure 4. Instead of a dense vector fetches, (B) and (D)
fetch the compressed sparse input activations and weights,
respectively. In addition, the coordinates of the non-zero values
in the compressed-sparse form of these data structures must be
fetched from their respective buffers (not shown). After that
the accumulator buffer (F) must be indexed with the computed
output coordinates from the sparse weight and activations.
Finally, when the computation for the output-channel group
has been completed the accumulator buffer is drained and
compressed into the next level of buffer.
PE
PE
PE
DRAM
Weights
PE
PE
Layer
Sequencer
IA
PE
PE
OA
PE
PE
Fig. 5. Complete SCNN architecture.
Each PE’s state machine operates on the weight and input activations in the order defined by the PT-IS-CP-sparse
dataflow to produce an output-channel group of Kc ×Wt × Ht
partial sums inside the accumulation buffers. First, a vector F
of compressed weights and a vector I of compressed input
activations are fetched from their respective buffers. These
vectors are distributed into the F×I multiplier array which
computes a form of the cartesian product of the vectors. At
the same time, the indices from the sparse-compressed weights
and activations are processed to compute the coordinates in
dense output activation. The F×I products are delivered to
an array of A accumulator banks, indexed by the output
coordinates. To reduce contention among products that hash to
the same accumulator bank, A is set to be larger than F×I. Our
results show that A = 2×F×I sufficiently reduces accumulator
bank contention. Each accumulator bank includes adders and
small set of entries for the output channels associated with
the output-channel group being processed. The accumulation
buffers are double-buffered so that one set of banks can be
updated by incoming partial sums while the second set of
banks are drained out by the PPU. When the output-channel
group is complete, the PPU performs the following tasks: (1)
exchange partial sums with neighbor PEs for the halo regions
at the boundary of the PE’s output activations, (2) apply
the non-linear activation (e.g. ReLU), pooling, and dropout
functions, and (3) compress the output activations into the
compressed-sparse form and write them into the OARAM.
SCNN uses a simple compressed-sparse encoding approach
based on run-length encoding scheme. The index vector
encodes the number of zeros between each element in the
compressed-sparse data vector. Determining the coordinates
in the accumulator buffer for each multiplier output requires
reading the index vectors for F and I and combining them
with the coordinates of portion of the output activation space
currently being processed. Four bits per index allows for up
to 15 zeros to appear between any two non-zero elements.
Non-zero elements that are further apart can have a zerovalue placeholder without incurring any noticable degradation
in compression efficiency.
While SCNN will operate most efficiently when the activa-
IV. SCNN A RCHITECTURE
A complete SCNN accelerator employing the PT-IS-CPsparse dataflow of Section III consists of multiple SCNN processing elements (PEs) connected via simple interconnections.
Figure 5 shows an array of PEs, with each PE including
channels for receiving weights and input activations, and
channels delivering output activations. The PEs are connected
to their nearest neighbors to exchange halo values during the
processing of each CNN layer. The PE array is driven by a
layer sequencer to orchestrate the movement of weights and
activations and is connected to a DRAM controller that can
broadcast weights to the PEs and stream activations to/from
the PEs.
Processing Element (PE) Architecture. Figure 6 shows
the microarchitecture of an SCNN PE, including a weight
buffer, input/output activation RAMs (IARAM and OARAM),
a multiplier array, a scatter crossbar, a bank of accumulator
buffers, and a post-processing unit (PPU). To process the
first CNN layer, the layer sequencer streams a portion of the
input image into the IARAM of each PE and broadcasts the
compressed-sparse weights into the weight buffer of each PE.
Upon completion of the layer, the sparse-compressed output
activation is distributed across the OARAMs of the PEs. When
possible, the activations are held in the IARAMs/OARAMs
and are never swapped out to DRAM. If the output activation
volume of a layer can serve as the input activation volume
for the next layer, the IARAMs and OARAMs are logically
swapped between the two layers’ computation sequences.
6
Weight FIFO
(sparse)
F
…
indices
F*I
I
indices
FxI multiplier array
Buffer bank
PPU:
Halos
ReLU
Compress
…
…
IARAM
(sparse)
F*I
indices
Coordinate
Computation
OARAM
(sparse)
I
F*I—A arbitrated xbar
F
Buffer bank
A accumulator buffers
Neighbors
1
Fig. 6. SCNN PE employing the PT-IS-CP-sparse dataflow.
TABLE II
SCNN DESIGN PARAMETERS .
PE Parameter
Multiplier width
Accumulator width
IARAM/OARAM (each)
Weight FIFO
Multiply array (F×I)
Accumulator banks
Accumulator bank entries
SCNN Parameter
# PEs
# Multipliers
IARAM + OARAM data
IARAM + OARAM indices
TABLE III
SCNN PE AREA BREAKDOWN .
Value
16 bits
24 bits
10KB
50 entries (500 B)
4×4
32
32
Value
64
1024
1MB
0.2MB
PE Component
IARAM + OARAM
Weight FIFO
Multiplier array
Scatter network
Accumulator buffers
Other
Total
Accelerator total
Size
20 KB
0.5 KB
16 ALUs
16×32 crossbar
6 KB
—
—
64 PEs
Area (mm2 )
0.031
0.004
0.008
0.026
0.036
0.019
0.123
7.9
sparse format. In total, the SCNN design includes a total
of 1,024 multipliers and 1MB of activation RAM. At the
synthesized clock speed of the PE of slightly more than 1
GHz, this design achieves a peak throughput of 2 Tera-ops
(16-bit multiplies plus 24-bit adds).
Area Analysis. To prototype the SCNN architecture, we
designed an SCNN PE in synthesizable SystemC and then
used the Catapult high-level synthesis (HLS) tool [23], [22]
to generate Verilog RTL. During this step, we used HLS
design constraints to optimize the design by mapping different
memory structures to synchronous RAMs and latch arrays
and pipelining the design to achieve full throughput. We then
used Synopsys Design Compiler to perform placement-aware
logic synthesis and obtain post-synthesis area estimates in a
TSMC 16nm FinFET technology. Table III summarizes the
area of the major structures of the SCNN PE. A significant
fraction of the PE area is contributed by memories (IARAM,
OARAM, accumulator buffers), which consume 57% of the PE
area, while the multiplier array only consumes 6%. IARAM
and OARAM are large in size and consume 25% of the PE
area. Accumulator buffers, though smaller in size compared to
IARAM/OARAM, are heavily banked (32 banks), contributing
to their large area.
tions fit in the on-chip activation RAMs, Large networks, such
as VGGNet, require activations to be saved to and restored
from DRAM. CNN accelerator architectures such as SCNN
can employ a tiling approach that operates on a 2D subset
of the activation space at a time. Our analysis shows that for
both dense and sparse architectures, the DRAM accesses for
one tile can be hidden by pipelining them in tandem with
the computation of another tile. While we do not present
the details of the tiled approach here, we do account for the
DRAM access energy overhead for tiling in Section VI.
SCNN Architecture Configuration. While the SCNN architecture can be scaled across a number of dimensions,
Table II lists the key parameters of the SCNN design we
explore in this paper. The design employs an 8×8 array of PEs,
each with a 4×4 multiplier array, and an accumulator buffer
with 32 banks. We chose a design point of 1,024 multipliers
to match the expected computation throughput required to
process HD video in real-time at acceptable frame rates. The
IARAM and OARAM are sized so that the sparse activations
of AlexNet and GoogleNet can fit entirely within these RAMs
so that activations need not spill to DRAM. The weight FIFO
and the activation RAMs each carry a 10-bit overhead for
each 16-bit value to encode the coordinates in the compressed-
V. E XPERIMENTAL M ETHODOLOGY
CNN performance and power measurements. To model
7
the performance of the SCNN architecture, we rely primarily on a custom-built cycle-level simulator. This simulator
is parameterizable across dimensions including number of
processing element (PE) tiles, RAM capacity, multiplier array
dimensions (F and I), and accumulator buffers (A). The SCNN
simulator is driven by the pruned weights and sparse input
activation maps extracted from the Caffe Python interface
(pycaffe) [3] and executes each layers of the network one
at a time. As a result, the simulator captures the effects of the
sparsity of the data and its effect on load balancing within the
SCNN architecture.
We also developed TimeLoop, a detailed analytical model
for CNN accelerators to enable an exploration of the design
space of dense and sparse architectures. TimeLoop can model
a wide range of data flows, including PT-IS-CP-dense, PT-ISCP-sparse and others. Architecture parameters to TimeLoop
include the memory hierarchy configuration (buffer size and
location), ALU count and partitioning, and dense/sparse hardware support. TimeLoop analyzes the input data parameters,
the architecture, and the dataflows, and computes the number
of cycles to process the layer based on a bottleneck analysis
and the counts of ALU operations and accesses to different
buffers in the memory hierarchy. We apply an energy model
to the time loop events derived from the synthesis modeling
to compute the overall energy required to execute the layer.
TimeLoop also computes the overall area of the accelerator
based on the inputs from the synthesis modeling. For SCNN,
the area model includes all of the elements from the synthesizable SystemC implementation. For dense architectures, area
is computed using area of the major structures (RAMs, ALUs,
and interconnect) derived from the SystemC modeling.
Architecture configurations. Table IV summarizes the major accelerator configurations that we explore, including both
dense and sparse accelerators. All of the accelerators employ
the same number of multiply ALUs so that we can compare the
performance of the accelerators with the same computational
resources. The dense DCNN accelerator operates solely on
dense weights and activations and employs a dataflow called
PT-IS-DP-dense, which is a variant of the PT-IS-CP-dense
data flow described in Section III that uses a dot-product as
its inner core operation. The optimized DCNN-opt architecture has the same configuration as DCNN but employs two
optimizations: (1) compression/decompression of activations
as they are transferred out of/into DRAM, and (2) multiply
ALU gating to save energy when a multiplier input is zero.
The DCNN architecture is configured with 2MB of SRAM for
holding inter-layer activations, and can hold all of them for
AlexNet and GoogLeNet. The SCNN configuration matches
the architecture described in Section IV, and includes a total
of 1MB of IARAM + OARAM. Because the activations are
compressed, this capacity enables all of the activation data
for the two networks to be held on chip, without requiring
DRAM transfers for activations. The larger VGGNet requires
the activation data to be transferred in and out of DRAM.
The area required for each accelerator is listed in the last
column. While SCNN has smaller activation RAM capacity,
TABLE IV
CNN ACCELERATOR CONFIGURATIONS .
DCNN
DCNN-opt
SCNN
# PEs
64
64
64
# MULs
1024
1024
1024
SRAM
2MB
2MB
1MB
Area (mm2 )
5.9
5.9
7.9
its larger size is due to the accumulator buffers, as described
in Section IV.
Benchmarks. To explore the sensitivity of the architectures
to sparsity parameters, we employ a synthetic network where
we can adjust the degree of sparsity of both weights and
activations. As described in Section II, we use AlexNet and
GoogLeNet for the bulk of our experiments. With respect to
GoogLeNet, we primarily focus on the convolutional layers
that are within the inception modules [28]. VGGNet is known
to be over-parameterized, which results in an extremely large
amount of inter-layer activation data (6 MB or about 4×) the
largest GoogLeNet layer. However, we use VGGNet as a proxy
for large input data (such has high-resolution images) to explore the implications of tiling data on the SCNN architecture
in Section VI-D.
VI. E VALUATION
This section first evaluates the sensitivity of SCNN to the
sparseness of weights and activations using a synthetic CNN
benchmark. We then discuss the performance and energyefficiency of SCNN versus a dense CNN accelerator, using
real world CNN applications. For brevity, all the inception
modules in GoogLeNet are denoted as IC_id in all of the
figures discussed in this section.
A. Sensitivity to CNN Sparsity
To explore the efficacy of sparse versus dense architecture,
we first measure performance and energy as a function of
density of weights and activations. Using the TimeLoop analysis tool, we examine GoogLeNet as we artificially sweep
the weight and activation densities together from 100% (fully
dense) down to 10%. Figure 7 shows results on SCNN,
DCNN, and DCNN-opt. On the x-axis, the total density is
the product of the weight and activation density. For example,
0.5/0.5 represents the point where both weights and activations
are 50% dense so the overall density is 25%. Figure 7a
shows that at 100% density, SCNN achieves about 79% of
the performance of DCNN because it suffers from multiplier
underutilization (discussed shortly). SCNN starts to perform
better than DCNN as density decreases to 85%, reaching a
24× improvement at 10% weight/activation density. This chart
does not include DCNN-opt as the energy optimizations over
DCNN do not affect performance.
Figure 7b first shows that DCNN-opt’s energy optimizations
of zero gating and DRAM traffic compression cause it to be
better than DCNN at every level of density. These energy
optimizations are surprisingly effective given that they have
such a small effect on the design of the accelerator. At
high density, SCNN is notably less energy efficient than
8
12
SCNN
10
1.2
8
Speedup
Latency (cycles)
DCNN/DCNN-opt
1.4
1
0.8
DCNN/DCNN-opt
SCNN
SCNN (oracle)
6
4
0.6
2
0.4
0
conv1
0.2
conv2
conv3
conv4
conv5
all
Per-layer
0
0.1/0.1
0.2/0.2
0.3/0.3
0.4/0.4
0.5/0.5
0.6/0.6
0.7/0.7
0.8/0.8
0.9/0.9
Network
(a) AlexNet
1.0/1.0
Weight / Activation Density
(a) Performance
DCNN-opt
SCNN
Speedup
DCNN
1.4
1.2
Energy
1
0.8
DCNN/DCNN-opt
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
IC_3a
0.6
IC_3b
IC_4a
IC_4b
IC_4c
SCNN
SCNN (oracle)
IC_4d
IC_4e
IC_5a
IC_5b
Per-layer
0.4
all
Network
(b) GoogLeNet
0.2
0
0.1/0.1
0.2/0.2
0.3/0.3
0.4/0.4
0.5/0.5
0.6/0.6
0.7/0.7
0.8/0.8
0.9/0.9
15
1.0/1.0
Weight / Activation Density
DCNN/DCNN-opt
SCNN
SCNN (oracle)
12
9
Speedup
(b) Energy
Fig. 7. GoogLeNet performance and energy as a function of density.
6
3
Per-layer
all
conv5_3
conv5_2
conv5_1
conv4_3
conv4_2
conv4_1
conv3_3
conv3_2
conv3_1
conv2_2
conv2_1
either DCNN architecture due to the overheads of storing and
maintaining the sparse data structures. SCNN becomes more
efficient than DCNN at about 83% weight/activation density
and more efficient than DCNN-opt at 60% density. Given the
density measurements of the networks in Figure 1, we expect
SCNN to outperform the dense architectures on nearly all
of the layers of the networks we examined and be largely
comparable in energy efficiency vs. DCNN-opt across these
layers.
conv1_2
conv1_1
0
Network
(c) VGGNet
Fig. 8. Performance.
number of non-zero activations and weights in the later layers
to fully utilize the multiplier arrays.
Figure 9 quantitatively demonstrates this intra-PE fragmentation of the multiplier array. For the last two inception
modules of GoogLeNet, the fragmentation issue becomes
noticeably severe, with less than an average 20% multiplier
utilization. In this layer 3 out of the 6 convolutional layers
within the inception module have a filter size of 1 × 1, only
having up to 8 non-zero weights within an output-channel
group with a Kc value of 8. Nonetheless, the last layers
generally account for a small portion of the overall execution
time and SCNN generally provides significant performance
improvement across the network. The right y-axis of Figure 9
demonstrates the effect of load imbalance across the PEs by
showing the fraction of cycles spent waiting at inter-PE barrier.
Overall, although the inter-PE global barriers and intra-PE
fragmentation prevents SCNN from reaching similar speedups
offered by oracular SCNN(oracle), it still provides an
average 2.7× performance over DCNN across the three stateof-the-art CNNs.
Energy-efficiency. Figure 10 compares the energy of the
three accelerator architectures across the layers of the three
networks. DCNN-opt improves energy efficiency by 2.0× over
DCNN, while SCNN increases average efficiency by 2.3×.
The behavior across the layers varies widely depending on the
density of the layer, ranging from 0.89× to 4.7× improvement
over DCNN and 0.76× to 1.9× improvement over DCNN-opt.
Input layers such as VGGNet conv1 1 and AlexNet conv1
B. SCNN Performance and Energy
Performance. This subsection discusses the performance
improvements offered by SCNN over the baseline dense
DCNN accelerator. To demonstrate the upper-bound opportunity on performance, we also present the speedups offered
by an oracular SCNN design (SCNN(oracle)). The performance of SCNN(oracle) is derived by dividing the number
of multiplication operations required for Cartesian productbased convolution (Section III) with the number of multipliers
available on-chip. Figure 8 summarizes the speedups offered
by SCNN versus a dense CNN accelerator. Overall, SCNN
consistently outperforms the DCNN design across all the
layers of AlexNet, GoogLeNet, and VGGNet, achieving an
average 2.37×, 2.19×, and 3.52× network-wide performance
improvement, respectively.
The
performance
gap
between
SCNN
versus
SCNN(oracle) widens in later layers of the network,
from left to right in the x-axis of Figure 8. The key reason
behind this gap is closely related to each layer’s average
PE multiplier array utilization. In general, the working set
allocated to each of the PEs in the later layers (e.g., IC_5b)
are smaller than those in the earlier layers (e.g., IC_3a).
As a result, it is more difficult to assign to a PE a sufficient
9
Multiplier util.
PE idle cycles
1
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
0
DCNN
0
conv1
conv2
conv3
conv4
1
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
conv5
conv1
0.4
0.2
0.2
0
0
IC_4c
IC_4d
IC_4e
IC_5a
IC_5b
(b) GoogLeNet
SCNN
1
0.6
0.4
0.2
IC_3b
IC_4a
IC_4b
IC_4c
IC_4d
IC_4e
IC_5a
IC_5b
all
Per-layer
1
0.8
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
0
(b) GoogLeNet
DCNN
DCNN-opt
SCNN
1.2
Energy (relative to DCNN)
0.8
Avg. PE idle cycles
Avg. multiplier util.
DCNN-opt
0.8
IC_3a
0
all
0
mul_util
idle_cycles
1
conv5
1.2
Energy (relative to DCNN)
0.6
0.4
DCNN
Avg. PE idle cycles
Avg. multiplier util.
0.6
IC_4b
conv4
(a) AlexNet
0.8
IC_4a
conv3
1
0.8
IC_3b
conv2
Per-layer
mul_util
idle_cycles
IC_3a
SCNN
0.8
(a) AlexNet
1
DCNN-opt
1.2
Energy (relative to DCNN)
0.8
Avg. PE idle cycles
Avg. multiplier util.
1
0.8
(c) VGGNet
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
Fig. 9. Average multiplier array utilization (left-axis) and the average fraction
of time PEs are stalled on a global barrier (right-axis), set at the boundaries
of output channel groups.
Per-layer
(c) VGGNet
Fig. 10. Energy-efficiency.
usually present a challenge for sparse architectures because
of their 100% input activation density. In such cases, the
overheads of SCNN’s structures such as the crossbar and
distributed accumulation RAMs overshadow any benefits from
fewer arithmetic operations and data movement.
inter-PE barriers for system-wide performance under our PTIS-CP-sparse dataflow.
C. PE Granularity
D. Larger Networks
As outlined in Section VI-B, both cross-PE global barriers
and intra-PE multiplier array fragmentation can contribute to
degradation in the performance of SCNN. We quantify the
effects of both of these factors on system performance by
conducting the following sensitivity study. Assuming a fixed,
chip-wide math throughput of 1,024 FLOPS, we sweep the
total number of PEs on-chip from 64 (8×8 PEs, 16 multipliers
per PE) down to 4 (2×2 PEs, 256 multipliers per PE). Clearly,
an SCNN with 4 PEs can better sustain the effects of the
global barriers than an SCNN with 64 PEs. However, the 4
PE configuration is also more likely to suffer from intra-PE
fragmentation because each PE must now process a larger
working set to fully utilize the math units. When evaluated
on GoogLeNet, SCNN with 64 PEs achieves an 11% speedup
than the one with 4 PEs as it does a better job utilizing the
math arrays (average 59% math utilization versus 35%). We
observed similar trends for AlexNet and VGGNet, concluding
that addressing intra-PE fragmentation is more critical than
SCNN is at its most efficient when it can capture all of the
activations in its IARAM and OARAM. For a network with
large layers like VGGNet, there are two choices. First, the
designer could choose to provision SCNN with IARAM and
OARAM large enough to hold the largest layer. While this approach would make processing the large layers more efficient
by avoiding off-chip DRAM accesses, smaller layers would
be penalized by incurring larger on-chip access overheads to
RAMs that are larger than necessary. The second choice is
to employ a tiling approach as described in Section IV. Our
results show that this is only required for 9 of the 72 total
evaluated layers, and for these 9 layers the overall energy
penalty for shuttling the activation data to and from DRAM
ranges from 5–62%, with a mean of 18%. While the tiling
approach is attractive, we expect that there will be low power
deployment scenarios that will motivate the designers of the
neural networks to size them so that they fit in the on-chip
SRAM capacity provided by the accelerator implementation.
10
VII. R ELATED W ORK
(PT-IS-CP-sparse) dataflow. This approach enables SCNN to
use a novel Cartesian product-based computation architecture
that maximizes reuse of weights and activations within a set
of distributed processing elements. In addition, it allows the
use of a dense compressed representation for both weights
and activations to be used through almost the entire processing flow. This approach reduces data movement and ondie storage capacity relative to alternative architectures. Our
results show that the SCNN architecture starts to beat a dense
architecture in performance and energy efficiency when the
weights and activations are each less than 85% dense. On three
contemporary networks (AlexNet, GoogLeNet, and VGGNet)
SCCN achieves performance improvements over the dense
architecture by a factor of 2.7× while still being energyefficient by a factor of 2.3×.
Previous efforts to exploit sparsity in CNN accelerators
have focused on reducing energy or saving time, which will
invariably also save energy. Eliminating the multiplication
when an input operand is zero is a natural way to save energy.
Eyeriss [7] gates the multiplier when it sees an input activation
of zero. For non-pruned networks the sparsity of weights is
a less significant factor, and Eyeriss opted not to gate the
multiplier on zero weights. This approach will save energy,
but not save cycles. SCNN also saves energy by eliminating
all the unnecessary multiplications, but doesn’t even prepare
to do a multiplication when any input operand is zero, thus
saving time as well.
Another approach to reducing energy is to reduce data
transfer costs when the data is sparse. Eyeriss uses a run length
encoding scheme when transferring activations to and from
DRAM. This saves energy (and time) by reducing the number
of DRAM accesses. However, after the data is loaded into
the on-chip buffer the data is stored in expanded form. Thus,
there is no savings on data transfers from one internal buffer to
another internal buffer or to the multipliers. SCNN also uses
a compressed representation for all data coming from DRAM,
but also maintains that compressed representation in the on-die
buffers.
Another CNN accelerator designed to exploit sparsity, Cnvlutin [1] compresses activation values. However, it does not
compress weights. Cambricon-X [30], does not compress the
data coming from DRAM. Nor does it keep activations in a
compressed form in the internal buffers, except in the queues
directly delivering activations to the multipliers. CambriconX does keep only non-zero weights in the internal buffers.
In contrast, SCNN keeps both weights and activations in a
compressed form in both DRAM and internal buffers. This
saves data transfer time and energy on all data transfers and
allows the chip hold larger models for a given amount of
internal storage.
Not delivering zero activation values or zero weights to
the multipliers can save time by avoiding cycles when the
multiplier has nothing to do. Cnvlutin selects only non-zero
activation values for delivery as multiplier operands, but does
occupy a multiplier with zero weights. Cambricon-X does not
deliver either zero activations or weights to the multipliers.
SCNN also does not deliver either zero activations or weights
to the multipliers.
Finally, the EIE CNN accelerator [13] uses a compressed
representation of both activations and weights, and only delivers non-zero operands to the multipliers. However, EIE is
designed for the fully connected layers of a CNN model, while
SCNN is targeting the convolutional layers where the majority
of the computations are [9].
R EFERENCES
[1] J. Albericio, P. Judd, T. Hetherington, T. Aamodt, N. E. Jerger, and
A. Moshovos. Cnvlutin: Ineffectual-Neuron-Free Deep Convolutional
Neural Network Computing. In Proceedings of the International
Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA), pages 1–13, June 2016.
[2] D. Amodei, R. Anubhai, E. Battenberg, C. Case, J. Casper, B. Catanzaro,
J. Chen, M. Chrzanowski, A. Coates, G. Diamos, E. Elsen, J. Engel,
L. Fan, C. Fougner, T. Han, A. Hannun, B. Jun, P. LeGresley, L. Lin,
S. Narang, A. Ng, S. Ozair, R. Prenger, J. Raiman, S. Satheesh,
D. Seetapun, S. Sengupta, Y. Wang, Z. Wang, C. Wang, B. Xiao,
D. Yogatama, J. Zhan, and Z. Zhu. Deep Speech 2: End-To-End Speech
Recognition in English and Mandarin. https://arxiv.org/abs/1512.02595,
2015.
[3] Caffe. http://caffe.berkeleyvision.org, 2016.
[4] Caffe Model Zoo.
https://github.com/BVLC/caffe/wiki/Model-Zoo,
2017.
[5] T. Chen, Z. Du, N. Sun, J. Wang, C. Wu, Y. Chen, and O. Temam.
DianNao: A Small-footprint High-throughput Accelerator for Ubiquitous
Machine-learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference
on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operation
Systems (ASPLOS), pages 269–284, March 2014.
[6] Y.-H. Chen, J. Emer, and V. Sze. Eyeriss: A Spatial Architecture
for Energy-Efficient Dataflow for Convolutional Neural Networks. In
Proceedings of the International Symposium on Computer Architecture
(ISCA), pages 367–379, June 2016.
[7] Y.-H. Chen, T. Krishna, J. Emer, and V. Sze. Eyeriss: An Energy-efficient
Reconfigurable Accelerator for Deep Convolutional Neural Networks.
In Proceedings of the International Solid State Circuits Conference
(ISSCC), February 2016.
[8] R. Collobert, J. Weston, L. Bottou, M. Karlen, K. Kavukcuoglu, and
P. Kuksa. Natural Language Processing (Almost) From Scratch. https:
//arxiv.org/abs/1103.0398, 2011.
[9] J. Cong and B. Xiao. Minimizing Computation in Convolutional Neural
Networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial
Neural Networks (ICANN), pages 281–290, September 2014.
[10] G. Diamos, S. Sengupta, B. Catanzaro, M. Chrzanowski, A. Coates,
E. Elsen, J. Engel, A. Hannun, and S. Satheesh. Persistent RNNs:
Stashing Recurrent Weights On-Chip. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), June 2016.
[11] Z. Du, R. Fasthuber, T. Chen, P. Ienne, L. Li, T. Luo, X. Feng, Y. Chen,
and O. Temam. ShiDianNao: Shifting Vision Processing Closer to the
Sensor. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Computer
Architecture (ISCA), pages 92–104, June 2015.
[12] A. Graves and J. Schmidhuber. Framewise Phoneme Classification With
Bidirectional LSTM and Other Neural Network Architectures. In Neural
Networks, 2005.
[13] S. Han, X. Liu, H. Mao, J. Pu, A. Pedram, M. Horowitz, and B. Dally.
EIE: Efficient Inference Engine on Compressed Deep Neural Network.
In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA), pages 243–254, June 2016.
[14] S. Han, H. Mao, and W. J. Dally. Deep Compression: Compressing
Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman
Coding. https://arxiv.org/abs/1510.00149, 2015.
VIII. C ONCLUSION
This paper presents the Sparse CNN (SCNN) accelerator
architecture for inference in convolutional neural networks.
SCNN exploits sparsity in both weights and activations using the PlanarTiled-InputStationary-CartesianProduct-sparse
11
[15] S. Han, J. Pool, J. Tran, and W. J. Dally. Learning Both Weights
and Connections for Efficient Neural Networks. In Proceedings of
the International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems
(NIPS), pages 1135–1143, December 2015.
[16] A. Hannun, C. Case, J. Casper, B. Catanzaro, G. Diamos, E. Elsen,
R. Prenger, S. Satheesh, S. Sengupta, A. Coates, and A. Y. Ng. Deep
Speech: Scaling Up End-To-End Speech Recognition. https://arxiv.org/
abs/1412.5567, 2014.
[17] K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun. Deep Residual Learning for Image
Recognition. https://arxiv.org/abs/1512.03385, 2015.
[18] G. Huang, Y. Sun, Z. Liu, D. Sedra, and K. Weinberger. Deep Networks
with Stochastic Depth. https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.09382, 2016.
[19] ImageNet. http://image-net.org, 2016.
[20] A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and G. E. Hinton. ImageNet Classification
with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. In Proceedings of the
International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems
(NIPS), December 2012.
[21] Y. LeCun, Y. Bengio, and G. Hinton. Deep Learning. Nature, 521:436–
444, May 2015.
[22] G. Martin and G. Smith. High-Level Synthesis: Past, Present, and Future.
IEEE Design & Test of Computers, 26(4):18–25, July/August 2009.
[23] Catapult High-Level Synthesis. https://www.mentor.com/hls-lp/catapulthigh-level-synthesis, 2017.
[24] NVIDIA cuDNN. https://developer.nvidia.com/cudnn, 2016.
[25] B. Reagen, P. Whatmough, R. Adolf, S. Rama, H. Lee, S. Lee, J. M. H.
Lobato, G.-Y. Wei, and D. Brooks. Minerva: Enabling Low-Power, HighAccuracy Deep Neural Network Accelerators. In Proceedings of the
International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA), pages 267–
278, June 2016.
[26] M. Rhu, N. Gimelshein, J. Clemons, A. Zulfiqar, and S. W. Keckler. vDNN: Virtualized Deep Neural Networks for Scalable, MemoryEfficient Neural Network Design. In Proceedings of the International
Symposium on Microarchitecture (MICRO), October 2016.
[27] K. Simonyan and A. Zisserman. Very Deep Convolutional Networks for
Large-Scale Image Recognition. https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.1556, May
2015.
[28] C. Szegedy, W. Liu, Y. Jia, P. Sermanet, S. Reed, D. Anguelov, D. Erhan,
V. Vanhoucke, and A. Rabinovich. Going Deeper with Convolutions.
In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern
Recognition (CVPR), June 2015.
[29] Wired. Microsoft Neural Net Shows Deep Learning Can Get Way
Deeper, 2016.
[30] S. Zhang, Z. Du, L. Zhang, H. Lan, S. Liu, L. Li, Q. Guo, T. Chen, and
Y. Chen. Cambricon-X: An Accelerator for Sparse Neural Networks.
In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Microarchitecture
(MICRO), October 2016.
12
| 9cs.NE
|
arXiv:1508.07119v1 [math.AC] 28 Aug 2015
BI-COHEN-MACAULAY GRAPHS
JÜRGEN HERZOG AND AHAD RAHIMI
Abstract. In this paper we consider bi-Cohen-Macaulay graphs, and give a complete classification of such graphs in the case they are bipartite or chordal. General bi-Cohen-Macaulay graphs are classified up to separation. The inseparable
bi-Cohen-Macaulay graphs are determined. We establish a bijection between the
set of all trees and the set of inseparable bi-Cohen-Macaulay graphs.
Introduction
A simplicial complex ∆ is called bi-Cohen-Macaulay (bi-CM), if ∆ and its Alexander dual ∆∨ are Cohen-Macaulay. This concept was introduced by Fløystad and
Vatne in [8]. In that paper the authors associated to each simplicial complex ∆ in
a natural way a complex of coherent sheaves and showed that this complex reduces
to a coherent sheaf if and only if ∆ is bi-CM.
The present paper is an attempt to classify all bi-CM graphs. Given a field K and
a simple graph on the vertex set [n] = {1, 2, . . . , n}, one associates with G the edge
ideal IG of G, whose generators are the monomials xi xj with {i, j} an edge of G. We
say that G is bi-CM if the simplicial complex whose Stanley-Reisner ideal coincides
with IG is bi-CM. Actually, this simplicial complex is the so-called independence
complex of G. Its faces are the independent sets of G, that is, subsets D of [n] with
{i, j} 6⊂ D for all edges {i, j} of G.
By its very definition, any bi-CM graph is also a Cohen-Macaulay graph (CM
graph). A complete classification of all CM graphs is hopeless if not impossible.
However, such a classification is given for bipartite graphs [10, Theorem 3.4] and for
chordal graphs [11]. We refer the reader to the books [9] and [14] for a good survey
on edge ideals and its algebraic and homological properties.
Based on the classification of bipartite and chordal CM graphs, we provide in
Section 2 a classification of bipartite and chordal bi-CM graphs, see Theorem 2.1
and Theorem 2.2. In Section 1 we first present various characterizations of bi-CM
graphs. By using the Eagon-Reiner theorem [5], one notices that the graph G is
bi-CM if and only if it is CM and IG has a linear resolution. Cohen-Macaulay ideals
generated in degree 2 with linear resolution are of very special nature. They all
arise as deformations of the square of the maximal ideal of a suitable polynomial
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. 05E40, 13C14.
Key words and phrases. Bi-Cohen–Macaulay, Bipartite and chordal graphs, Generic graphs,
Inseparability.
This paper was written during the visit of the second author at Universität Duisburg-Essen,
Campus Essen. He is grateful for its hospitality.
1
ring. From this fact arise constraints on the number of edges of the graph and on
the Betti numbers of IG .
Though a complete classification of all bi-CM graphs seems to be again impossible,
a classification of all bi-CM graphs up to separation can be given, and this is the
subject of the remaining sections.
A separation of the graph G with respect to the vertex i is a graph G′ whose vertex
set is [n] ∪ {i′ } having the property that G is obtained from G′ by identifying i with
i′ and such that xi − xi′ is a non-zerodivisor modulo IG′ . The algebraic condition
on separation makes sure that the essential algebraic and homological invariants of
IG and IG′ are the same. In particular, G is bi-CM if and only if G′ is bi-CM. A
graph which does not allow any separation is called inseparable, and a inseparable
graph which is obtained by a finite number of separation steps from G is called
a separable model of G. Any graph admits separable models and the number of
separable models of a graph is finite. Separable and inseparable graphs from the
view point of deformation theory have been studied in [1].
In Section 4 we determine all inseparable bi-CM graphs on [n] vertices. Indeed,
in Theorem 4.4 it is shown that for any tree T on the vertex set [n] there exists a
unique inseparable bi-CM graph GT determined by T , and any inseparable bi-CM
graph is of this form. Furthermore, if G is an arbitrary bi-CM graph and T is the
relation graph of the Alexander dual of IG , then GT is a separable model of G.
For a bi-CM graph G, the Alexander dual J = (IG )∨ of IG is a Cohen-Macaulay
ideal of codimension 2 with linear resolution. As described in [3], one attaches to
any relation matrix of J a relation tree T . Replacing the entries in this matrix
by distinct variables with the same sign, one obtains the so-called generic relation
matrix whose ideals of 2-minors JT and its Alexander has been computed in [13].
This theory is described in Section 3. The Alexander dual of JT is the edge ideal
of graph, which actually is the graph GT mentioned before and which serves as a
separable model of G.
1. Preliminaries and various characterizations of
Bi-Cohen-Macaulay graphs
In this section we recall some of the standard notions of graph theory which are
relevant for this paper, introduce the bi-CM graphs and present various equivalent
conditions of a graph to be bi-CM.
The graphs considered here will all be finite, simple graphs, that is, they will
have no double edges and no loops. Furthermore we assume that G has no isolated
vertices. The vertex set of G will be denoted V (G) and will be the set [n] =
{1, 2, . . . , n}, unless otherwise stated. The set of edges of G we denote by E(G).
A subset F ⊂ [n] is called a clique of G, if {i, j} ∈ E(G) for all i, j ∈ F with
i 6= j. The set of all cliques of G is a simplicial complex, denoted ∆(G).
A subset C ⊂ [n] is called a vertex cover of G if C ∩ {i, j} =
6 ∅ for all edges {i, j}
of G. The graph G is called unmixed if all minimal vertex covers of G have the
same cardinality. This concept has an algebraic counterpart. We fix a field K and
consider the ideal IG ⊂ S = K[x1 , . . . , xn ] which is generated by all monomials xi xj
2
with {i, j} ∈ E(G). The ideal IG is called the edge ideal of G. Let C ⊂ [n]. Then the
monomial prime ideal PC = ({xi : i ∈ C}) is a minimal prime ideal of IG if and only
if C is a minimal vertex cover of G. Thus G is unmixed if and only if IG is unmixed in
the algebraic sense. A subset D ⊂ [n] is called an independent set of G if D contains
no set {i, j} which is an edge of G. Note that D is an independent set of G if and
only if [n] \ D is a vertex cover. Thus the minimal vertex covers of G correspond to
the maximal independent sets of G. The cardinality of a maximal independent is
called the independence number of G. It follows that the Krull dimension of S/IG
is equal to c, where c is the independence number of G.
The graph G is called bipartite if V (G) is the disjoint union of V1 and V2 such that
V1 and V2 are independent sets, and G is called disconnected if V (G) is the disjoint
union of W1 and W2 and there is no edge {i, j} of G with i ∈ W1 and j ∈ W2 . The
graph G is called connected if it is not disconnected.
A cycle C (of length r) in G is a sequence of edges {ik , jk } with k = 1, 2, . . . , r
such that jk = ik+1 for k = 1, . . . , r − 1 and jr = i1 . A cord of C is an edge {i, j}
of G with i, j ∈ {i1 , . . . , ir } and {i, j} is not an edge of C. The graph G is called
chordal if each cycle of G of length ≥ 4 has a chord. A graph which has no cycle
and which is connected is called a tree.
Now we recall the main concept we are dealing with in this paper. Let I ⊂ S be
T
a squarefree monomial ideal. Then I = m
j=1 Pj where each of the Pj is a monomial
∨
prime ideal of I. The ideal I which is minimally generated by the monomials
Q
uj = xi ∈Pj xi is called the Alexander dual of I. One has (I ∨ )∨ = I. In the case that
I = IG , each Pj is generated by the variables corresponding to a minimal vertex
cover of G. Therefore, (IG )∨ is also called the vertex cover ideal of G.
According to [8] a squarefree monomial ideal I ⊂ S is called bi-Cohen-Macaulay
(or simply bi-CM) if I as well as the Alexander dual I ∨ of I is a Cohen-Macaulay
ideal. A graph G is called Cohen-Macaulay or bi-Cohen-Macaulay (over K) (CM or
bi-CM for short), if IG is CM or bi-CM. One important result regarding the Alexander dual that will be used frequently in this paper is the Eagon-Reiner theorem
which says that I is a Cohen-Macaulay ideal if and only if I ∨ has a linear resolution. Thus the Eagon-Reiner theorem implies that I is bi-CM if and only if I is a
Cohen-Macaulay ideal with linear resolution. From this description it follows that
a bi-CM graph is connected. Indeed, if this is not the case, then there are induced
subgraphs G1 , G2 ⊂ G such that V (G) is the disjoint union of V (G1 ) and V (G2 ). It
follows that IG = IG1 + IG2 , and the ideals IG1 and IG2 are ideals in a different set
of variables. Therefore, the free resolution of S/IG is obtained as the tensor product
of the resolutions of S/IG1 and S/IG2 . This implies that IG has relations of degree
4, so that IG does not have a linear resolution.
From now on we will always assume that G is connected, without further mentioning it.
Proposition 1.1. Let K be an infinite field and G a graph on the vertex set [n]
with independence number c. The following conditions are equivalent:
(a) G is a bi-CM graph over K;
3
(b) G is a CM graph over K, and S/IG modulo a maximal regular sequence of
linear forms is isomorphic to T /m2T where T is the polynomial ring over K
in n − c variables and mT is the graded maximal ideal of T .
Proof. We only need to show that IG has a linear resolution if and only if condition
(b) holds. Since K is infinite and since S/IG is Cohen-Macaulay of dimension c, there
exists a regular sequence x of linear forms on S/IG of length c. Let T = S/(x). Then
T is isomorphic to a polynomial ring in n − c variables. Let J be the image of IG
in T . Then J is generated in degree 2 and has a linear resolution if and only if IG
has linear resolution. Moreover, J is mT -primary. The only mT -primary ideals with
linear resolution are the powers of mT . Thus, IG has a linear resolution if and only
if J = m2T .
Corollary 1.2. Let G be a graph on the vertex set [n] with independence number c.
The following conditions are equivalent:
(a) G is a bi-CM graph over K;
(b) G is a CM graph over K and |E(G)| = n−c+1
;
2
(c) G is a CM graph over K and the number of minimal vertex covers of G is
equal to n − c +1;
(d) βi (IG ) = (i + 1) n−c+1
for i = 0, . . . , n − c − 1.
i+2
Proof. For the proof of the equivalent conditions we may assume that K is infinite
and hence we may use Proposition 1.1.
2
(a) ⇐⇒ (b): With the notation of Proposition
1.1 we have J = mT if and only
n−c+1
if the number of generators of J is equal to
. Since IG and J have the same
2
number of generators and since the number of generators of IG is equal to |E(G)|,
the assertion follows.
(b) ⇐⇒ (c): Since S/IG is Cohen-Macaulay, the multiplicity of S/IG is equal to
the length ℓ(T /J) of T /J. On the other hand, the multiplicity is also the number
of minimal prime ideals of IG which coincides with the number of minimal vertex
covers of G. Thus the length of T /J is equal to the number of minimal vertex covers
of G. Since J = m2T if and only if ℓ(T /J) = n − c + 1, the assertion follows.
(a) ⇒ (d): Note that βi (IG ) = βi (J) for all i. Since J is isomorphic to the ideal
of 2-minors of the matrix
!
y1 y2 . . . yn−c
0
0 y1 . . . yn−c−1 yn−c
in the variables y1 , . . . , yn−c , the Eagon-Northcott complex ([4], [6]) provides a free
resolution of J and the desired result follows.
(d) ⇒ (a): It follows from the description of the Betti numbers of IG that
proj dim S/IG = n − c. Thus, depth S/IG = c. Since dimS/IG = c, it follows
that IG is a Cohen-Macaulay ideal. Since |E(G)| = β0 (IG ) = n−c+1
, condition (b)
2
is satisfied, and hence G is bi-CM, as desired.
Finally we note that G is a bi-CM graph over K if and only if the vertex cover ideal
of G is a codimension 2 Cohen-Macaulay ideal with linear relations. Indeed, let JG
4
be the vertex cover ideal of G. Since JG = (IG )∨ , it follows from the Eagon-Reiner
theorem JG is bi-CM if and only if IG is bi-CM.
2. The classification of bipartite and chordal bi-CM graphs
In this section we give a full classification of the bipartite and chordal bi-CM
graphs.
Theorem 2.1. Let G be a bipartite graph on the vertex set V with bipartition
V = V1 ∪ V2 where V1 = {v1 , . . . , vn } and V2 = {w1 , . . . , wm }. Then the following conditions are equivalent:
(a) G is a bi-CM graph;
(b) n = m and E(G) = {{vi , wj } : 1 ≤ i ≤ j ≤ n}.
Proof. (a) ⇒ (b): Since G is a bi-CM graph, it is in particular a CM-graph, and
so n = m, and by [9, Theorem 9.1.13] there exists a poset P = {p1 , . . . , pn } such
that G = G(P ). Here G(P ) is the bipartite graph on V = {v1 , . . . , vn , w1, . . . , wn }
whose edges are those 2-element subset {vi , wj } of V such that pi ≤ pj . Thus
IG = IG(P ) = HP∨ , where
\
HP =
(xi , yj )
pi ≤pj
is an ideal of S = K[{xi , yi}pi ∈P ], the polynomial ring in 2n variables over K. Since
G is bi-CM, it follows that HP is Cohen–Macaulay, and hence
proj dim S/HP = 2n − depth S/HP = 2n − dim S/HP = height HP = 2.
Thus proj dim HP = 1, and hence, by [10, Corollary 2.2], the Sperner number of P ,
i.e., the maximum of the cardinalities of antichains of P equals 1. This implies that
P is a chain, and this yields (b).
(b) ⇒ (a): The graph G described in (b) is of the form G = G(P ) where P is a
chain. By what is said in (a) ⇒ (b), it follows that G is bi-CM.
The following picture shows a bi-CM bipartite graph for n = 4.
x1
•
x2
•
x3
•
x4
•
•
y1
•
y2
•
y3
•
y4
Figure 1. A bi-CM bipartite graph.
Theorem 2.2. Let G be a chordal graph on the vertex set [n]. The following conditions are equivalent:
(a) G is a bi-CM graph;
5
(b) Let F1 , . . . , Fm be the facets of the clique complex of G. Then m = 1,
or m > 1 and
(i) V (G) = V (F1 ) ∪ V (F2 ) ∪ . . . ∪ V (Fm ), and this union is disjoint;
(ii) each Fi has exactly one free vertex ji ;
(iii) the restriction of G to [n] \ {j1 , . . . , jm } is a clique.
Proof. Let In,d be the ideal generated by all squarefree monomials of degree d in
∨
S = K[x1 , . . . , xn ]. It is known (and easy to prove) that In,d
= In,n−d+1 , and that
all these ideals are Cohen-Macaulay, and hence all bi-CM. If m = 1, then IG = In,2
and the result follows.
Now let m > 1. A bi-CM graph is a CM graph. The CM chordal graphs have
been classified in [11]: they are the chordal graphs satisfying (b)(i). Thus for the
proof of the theorem we may assume that (b)(i) holds and simply have to show that
(b)(ii) and (b)(iii) are satisfied if and only if IG has a linear resolution.
Let Pi be the monomial prime ideal generated by the variables xk with k ∈
V (Fi ) \ {ji }, and let G′ be subgraph of G whose edges do not belong to any Fi . It
is shown in the proof of [11, Corollary 2.1] that there exists a regular sequence on
S/IG such that after reduction modulo this sequence one obtains the ideal J ⊂ T
where T is the polynomial ring on the variables xk with k 6= ji for i = 1, . . . , m and
where
(1)
J = (P12 , . . . , Pm2 , IG′ ).
By Proposition 1.1, it follows that IG has a linear resolution if and only if J = m2T ,
where mT denotes the graded maximal ideal of T .
So, now suppose first that IG has a linear resolution, and hence J = m2T . Suppose
that some Fi has more than one free vertex, say Fi has the vertex k with k 6= ji .
Choose any Ft different from Fi and let l ∈ Fj with l 6= jt . Then xk and xl belong
to T but xk xl 6∈ J as can be seen from (1). This is a contradiction. Thus (b)(ii)
follows.
Suppose next that the graph G′′ which is the restriction of G to [n] \ {j1 , . . . , jm }
is not a clique. Then there exist i, j ∈ V (G′′ ) such that {i, j} 6∈ E(G′′ ). However,
since all xk with k ∈ V (G′′ ) belong to T and since J = m2T , it follows xi xj ∈ J.
Thus, by (1), xi xj ∈ Pk2 for some k or xi xj ∈ IG′ . Since (b)(ii) holds, this implies in
both cases that {i, j} ∈ E(G′′ ), a contradiction. Thus (b)(iii) follows.
Conversely, suppose (b)(ii) and (b)(iii) hold. We want to show that J = m2T . Let
xi , xj ∈ T . We have to show that xi xj ∈ J. It follows from the description of J
that x2k ∈ J for all xk ∈ T . Thus we may assume that i 6= j. If {i, j} is not an
edge of any Fk , then by definition it is an edge of G′ , and hence xi xj ∈ IG′ ⊂ J.
On the other hand, if {i, j} is an edge of Fk for some k, then i, j 6= ik , and hence
xi xj ∈ Pk2 ⊂ J. Thus the desired conclusion follows.
Let G be a chordal bi-CM graph as in Theorem 2.2(b) with m > 1. We call the
complete graph G′′ which is the restriction of G to [n] \ {j1 , . . . , jm } the center of G.
The following picture shows, up to isomorphism, all bi-CM chordal graphs whose
center is the complete graph K4 on 4 vertices:
6
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Figure 2.
3. Generic Bi-CM graphs
As we have already seen in the first section, the Alexander dual J = IG∨ of the edge
ideal of a bi-CM graph G is a Cohen–Macaulay ideal of codimension 2 with linear
resolution. The ideal J may have several distinct relation matrices with respect to
the unique minimal monomial set of generators of J. As shown in [3], one may
attach to each of the relation matrices of J a tree as follows: let u1 , . . . , um be the
unique minimal set of generators of J. Let A be one of the relation matrices of J.
Because J has a linear resolution, the generating relations of J may be chosen all of
the form xk ui − xl uj = 0. This implies that in each row of the (m − 1) × m-relation
matrix A there are exactly two non-zero entries (which are variables with different
signs). We call such relations, relations of binomial type.
Example 3.1. Consider the bi-CM graph G on the vertex set [5] and edges {1, 2}
{2, 3}, {3, 1}, {2, 4}, {3, 4}, {4, 5} as displayed in Figure 3.
x2
•
x1 •
x4
•
x5
•
•
x3
Figure 3.
The ideal J = IG∨ is generated by u1 = x2 x3 x4 , u2 = x1 x3 x4 , u3 = x2 x3 x5 and
u4 = x1 x2 x4 . The relation matrices with respect to u1 , u2, u3 and u4 are the matrices
and
x1 −x2
0
0
0 −x4
0
A1 = x5
,
x1
0
0 −x3
x1 −x2
0
0
0 −x4
0
A2 = x5
.
0 x2
0 −x3
7
Coming back to the general case, one assigns to the relation matrix A the following
graph Γ: the vertex set of Γ is the set V (Γ) = {1, 2, . . . , m}, and {i, j} is said to
be an edge of Γ if and only if some row of A has non-zero entries for the ith- and
jth-component. It is remarked in [3] and easy to see that Γ is a tree. This tree is in
general not uniquely determined by G.
In our Example 3.1 the relation tree of A1 is
x3
•
•
x4
•
x1
•
x2
Figure 4.
while the relation tree of A2 is
•
x3
•
x1
•
x2
•
x4
Figure 5.
Now let J be any codimension 2 Cohen-Macaulay monomial ideal with linear
resolution. Then, as observed in Section 1, J ∨ = IG where G is a bi-CM graph.
Now we follow Naeem [13] and define for any given tree T on the vertex set [m] =
{1, . . . , m} with edges e1 , . . . , em−1 the (m − 1) × m-matrix AT whose entries akl are
defined as follows: we assign to the kth edge ek = {i, j} of T with i < j the kth row
of AT by setting
(2)
xij ,
akl = −xji ,
0,
if l = i,
if l = j,
otherwise.
The matrix AT is called the generic matrix attached to the tree T .
By the Hilbert-Burch theorem [2], the matrix AT is the relation matrix of the ideal
JT of maximal minors of AT , and JT is a Cohen-Macaulay ideal of codimension 2
with linear resolution.
We let GT be the graph such that IGT = J ∨ , and call GT the generic bi-CM graph
attached to T .
Our discussion so far yields
Proposition 3.2. For any tree T , the graph GT is bi-CM.
8
In order to describe the vertices and edges of GT , let i and j be any two vertices
of the tree T . There exists a unique path P : i = i0 , i1 , . . . , ir = j from i to j. We
set b(i, j) = i1 and call b(i, j) the begin of P , and set e(i, j) = ir−1 and call e(i, j)
the end of P .
It follows from [13, Proposition 1.4] that IGT is generated by the monomials
xib(i,j) xje(i,j). Thus the vertex set of the graph GT is given as
V (GT ) = {(i, j), (j, i) : {i, j} is an edge of T }.
In particular, {(i, k), (j, l)} is an edge of GT if and only if there exists a path P from
i to j such that k = b(i, j) and l = e(i, j).
In Example 3.1, let T1 and T2 be the relation trees of A1 and A2 , respectively.
Then the generic matrices corresponding to these trees are
x12 −x21
0
0
x
0
−x
0
B1 = 13
,
31
x14
0
0
−x41
and
x12 −x21
0
0
0
−x31
0
B2 = x13
.
0
x24
0
−x42
The generic graphs corresponding to the trees T1 and T2 are displayed in Figure 6.
• x12
x21
•
• x21
x14 •
• x31
•
x13
•
x41
x31
•
x12 •
• x13
•
x42
GT2
GT1
Figure 6.
It follows from this description
that
GT has 2(m − 1) vertices. Since GT is bi-CM,
n−c+1
the number of edges of GT is
, see Corollary 1.2. Here n − c is the degree of
2
the generators of IG∨ which is m − 1. Hence GT has m2 edges. Among the edges of
GT are in particular the m − 1 edges {(i, j), (j, i)} where {i, j} is an edge of T .
Proposition 3.3. Let A be the relation matrix of a codimension 2 Cohen-Macaulay
monomial ideal J with linear resolution, and assume that all the variables appearing
in A are pairwise distinct. Let T be the relation tree of A. Then J is isomorphic to
JT and J admits the unique relation tree, namely T .
9
Proof. Since all variables appearing in A are pairwise distinct, we may rename the
variables appearing in a binomial type relation and call them as in the generic matrix
xij and xji . Then A becomes AT and this shows that J ∼
= JT .
To prove the uniqueness of the relation tree, we first notice that the shifts in the
multigraded free resolution of J are uniquely determined and independent of the
particular choice of the relation matrix A. A possibly different relation matrix A′
can arise from A only be row operations with rows of the same multidegree. Let
r1 , . . . , rl by rows of A with the same multidegree corresponding to binomial type
relations, and fix a column j. Then the non-zero jth columns of each of the ri must
be the same, up to a sign. Since we assume that the variables appearing in A are
pairwise distinct, it follows that l = 1. In particular, there is, up to the order of the
rows, only one relation matrix with rows corresponding to binomial type relations.
This shows that T is uniquely determined.
4. Inseparable models of Bi-CM graphs
In order to state the main result of this paper we recall the concept of inseparability introduced by Fløystad et al in [7], see also [12].
Let S = K[x1 , . . . , xn ] be the polynomial ring over the field K and I ⊂ S a
squarefree monomial ideal minimally generated by the monomials u1 , . . . , um . Let y
be an indeterminate over S. A monomial ideal J ⊂ S[y] is called a separation of I
for the variable xi if the following holds:
(i) the ideal I is the image of J under the K-algebra homomorphism S[y] → S
with y 7→ xi and xj 7→ xj for all j;
(ii) xi as well as y divide some minimal generator of J;
(iii) y − xi is a non-zero divisor of S[y]/J.
The ideal I is called separable if it admits a separation, otherwise inseparable. If J is
an ideal which is obtained from I by a finite number of separation steps, then we say
that J specializes to I. If moreover, J is inseparable, then J is called an inseparable
model of I. Each monomial ideal admits an inseparable model, but in general not
only one. For example, the separable models of the powers of the graded maximal
ideal of S have been considered by Lohne [12].
Forming the Alexander dual behaves well with respect to specialization and separation.
Proposition 4.1. Let I ⊂ S be a squarefree monomial ideal. Then the following
holds:
(a) If J specializes to I, then J ∨ specializes to I ∨ .
(b) The ideal I is separable if and only I ∨ is separable.
Proof. (a) It follows from [7, Proposition 7.2] that if L ⊂ S[y] is a monomial ideal
such that y−xi is a regular element on S[y]/L with (S[y]/L)/(y−xi)(S[y]/L) ∼
= S/I,
∨
∨
∨ ∼
then y −xi is a regular element on S[y]/L and (S[y]/L )/(y −xi )(S[y]/L ) = S/I ∨ .
Repeated applications of this fact yields the desired result.
(b) We may assume that the ideal L as in (a) is a separation of I with respect to
xi . Since (a) holds, it remains to show that y as well as xi divides some generator
10
of L∨ . By assumption this is the case for L. Suppose that y does not divide any
generator of L∨ . Then it follows from the definition of the Alexander dual that y also
does not divide any generator of (L∨ )∨ . This is a contradiction, since L = (L∨ )∨ .
Similarly it follows that xi divides some generator of L∨ .
We now apply these concepts to edge ideals. Let G be a graph on the vertex
set [n]. We call G separable if IG is separable, and otherwise inseparable. Let J
be a separation of IG for the variable xi . Then by the definition of separation,
J is again an edge ideal, say J = IG′ where G′ is a graph with one more vertex
than G. The graph G is obtained from G′ by identifying this new vertex with
the vertex i of G. Algebraically, this identification amounts to say that S/IG ∼
=
(S ′ /IG′ )/(y−xi )(S ′ /IG′ ), where S ′ = S[y] and y−xi is a non-zerodivisor of S ′ /IG′ . In
particular, it follows that IG and IG′ have the same graded Betti-numbers. In other
words, all important homological invariants of IG and IG′ are the same. It is therefore
of interest to classify all inseparable graphs. An attempt for this classification is
given in [1].
Example 4.2. Let G be the triangle and G′ be the line graph displayed in Figure 7.
x3
•
•
x1
x3 •
•
x2
•
x1
• x4
•
x2
Figure 7. A triangle and its inseparable model
Then IG′ = (x1 x2 , x1 x3 , x2 x4 ). Since Ass(IG′ ) = {(x1 , x2 ), (x1 , x4 ), (x2 , x3 )}, it
follows that x3 − x4 is a non-zero divisor on S ′ /IG′ where S ′ = K[x1 , x2 , x3 , x4 ].
Moreover, (S ′ /IG′ )/(x3 − x4 )(S ′ /IG′ ) ∼
= S/IG . Therefore, the triangle in Figure 7
is obtained as a specialization from the line graph in Figure 7 by identifying the
vertices x3 and x4 .
We denote by G(i) the complementary graph of the restriction GN (i) of G to
N(i) where N(i) = {j : {j, i} ∈ E(G)} is the neighborhood of i. In other words,
V (G(i) ) = N(i) and E(G(i) ) = {{j, k} : j, k ∈ N(i) and {j, k} 6∈ E(G)}. Note that
G(i) is disconnected if and only if N(i) = A ∪ B, where A, B 6= ∅, A ∩ B = ∅ and all
vertices of A are adjacent to those of B.
Here we will need the following result of [1, Theorem 3.1].
Theorem 4.3. The following conditions are equivalent:
(a) The graph G is inseparable;
(b) G(i) is connected for all i.
Now we are ready to state our main result.
11
Theorem 4.4. (a) Let T be a tree. Then GT is an inseparable bi-CM graph.
(b) For any inseparable bi-CM graph G, there exists a unique tree T such that
G∼
= GT .
(c) Let G be any bi-CM graph. Then there exists a tree T such that GT is an
inseparable model of G.
Proof. (a) By Corollary 3.2, GT is a bi-CM graph. In order to see that GT is
inseparable we apply the criterion given in Theorem 4.3, and thus we have to prove
that for each vertex (i, j) of GT and for each disjoint union N((i, j)) = A ∪ B of the
neighborhood of (i, j) for which A 6= ∅ =
6 B, not all vertices of A are adjacent to
those of B.
As follows from the discussion in Section 3,
N((i, j)) = {(k, l) : there exists a path from i to l, and j = b(i, l) and k = e(i, l)}.
In particular, (j, i) ∈ N((i, j)). Let N((i, j)) = A ∪ B, as above. We may assume
that (j, i) ∈ A. Since T is a tree, then there is no path from j to any l with
(k, l) ∈ N((i, j)), because otherwise we would have a loop in T . This shows that
(j, i) is connected to no vertex in B, as desired.
(b) Let A be a relation matrix of J = IG∨ and T the relation tree of A. The nonzero entries of A are variables with sign ±1. Say the kth row of A has the non-zero
entries akik and akjk with ik < jk . We may assume that the variable representing
akik has a positive sign while that akjk has a negative sign, and that this is so for
each row. We claim that the variables appearing in the non-zero entries of A are
pairwise distinct. By Proposition 3.3 this then implies that T is the only relation
tree of J and that G ∼
= GT .
In order to prove the claim, we consider the generic matrix AT corresponding to T .
Let S ′ be the polynomial ring over S in the variables xij and xji with {i, j} ∈ E(T ).
For each k we consider the linear forms ℓk1 = xik jk − akik and ℓk2 = xjk ik − akjk .
For example, for the matrix A2 in Example 3.1 the linear forms are ℓ11 = x12 − x1 ,
ℓ12 = x21 − x2 , ℓ21 = x13 − x5 , ℓ22 = x31 − x4 , ℓ31 = x24 − x2 and ℓ32 = x42 − x3 .
We let ℓ be the sequence of linear form ℓ11 , ℓ12 , . . . , ℓm−1,1 , ℓm−1,2 in S ′ . Then
(S ′ /JT S ′ )/(ℓ)(S ′/JT S ′ ) ∼
= S/J. Since both ideals, J as well as JT , are CohenMacaulay ideals of codimension 2, it follows that ℓ is a regular sequence on S ′ /JT S ′ .
Thus, assuming the variables appearing in the non-zero entries of A are not all
pairwise distinct, we see that J is separable. Indeed, suppose that the variable xk
appears at least twice in the matrix. Then we replace only one of the xk by the
corresponding generic variable xij to obtain the matrix A′ . Let J ′ be the ideal of
maximal minors of A′ . It follows from the above discussions that xij −xk is a regular
element of S[xij ]/J ′ . In order to see that J ′ is a separation of J it remains to be
shown that xij as well as xk appear as factors of generators of J ′ . Note that J ′ is
a specialization of JT . The minors of AT which are the generators of JT are the
Q
monomials m+1
i=1 xib(i,j) for j = 1, . . . , m + 1, see [13, Proposition 1.2]. From this
i6=j
description of the generators of JT it follows that all entries of AT appear as factors
of generators of JT . Since J ′ is a specialization of JT , the same holds true for J ′ ,
and since xij as well as xk are entries of A′ , the desired conclusion follows.
12
Now since we know that J is separable, Proposition 4.1(b) implies that G is
separable as well. This is a contradiction.
(c) Let A be a relation matrix of J = IG∨ and T the corresponding relation tree.
As shown in the proof of part (b), JT specializes to J, and hence IGT specializes
to IG , by Proposition 4.1(a). By part (a), the graph GT is inseparable. Thus we
conclude that GT is an inseparable model of G, as desired.
References
[1] K. Altmann, M. Bigdeli, J. Herzog, D. Lu, Algebraically rigid simplicial complexes and graphs,
arXiv: 1503.08080[math.AC].
[2] W. Bruns and J. Herzog, "Cohen–Macaulay rings" (Revised edition), Cambridge Studies in
Advanced Mathematics 39, Cambridge University Press, 1998.
[3] W. Bruns and J. Herzog, On multigraded resolutions, Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 118
(1995), 245–257.
[4] W. Bruns and U. Vetter, Determinantal rings, Springer Verlag, Graduate texts in Mathematics
150 (1995).
[5] J. A. Eagon, V. Reiner, Resolutions of Stanley-Reisner rings and Alexander duality, J. Pure
Appl. Algebra 130 (1998), 265-275.
[6] D. Eisenbud, Commutative Algebra with a view to Algebraic geometry, Springer Verlag, 1995.
[7] G. Fløystad, B. M. Greve, J. Herzog, Letterplace and co-letterplace ideals of posets,
arXiv:1501.04523[math.AC].
[8] G. Fløystad, J. E. Vatne, (Bi-)Cohen–Macaulay simplicial complexes and their associated
coherent sheaves, Comm. Algebra 33 (2005), 3121–3136.
[9] J. Herzog and T. Hibi, Monomial Ideals. GTM 260. Springer 2010.
[10] J. Herzog and T. Hibi, Distributive lattices, Bipartite graphs and Alexander duality, J. Algebraic Combin., 22(2005), 289–302.
[11] J. Herzog and T. Hibi, X. Zheng, Cohen–Macaulay chordal graphs, J. Combin. Theory Ser.
A, 113(2006), 911–916.
[12] H. Lohne, The many polarizations of powers of maximal ideals, arXiv:1303.5780 (2013).
[13] M. Naeem, Cohen–Macaulay monomial ideals of codimension 2, Manuscripta math,
127(2008), 533–545.
[14] R. H. Villarreal, Monomial Algebras, Second Edition, Monographs and Research Notes in
Mathematics, CRC Press, 2015.
Jürgen Herzog, Fachbereich Mathematik, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Fakultät
für Mathematik, 45117 Essen, Germany
E-mail address: [email protected]
Ahad Rahimi, Department of Mathematics, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
E-mail address: [email protected]
13
| 0math.AC
|
arXiv:1702.02997v3 [math.GR] 28 Mar 2018
The Noether numbers and the Davenport
constants of the groups of order less than 32
Kálmán Cziszter
∗ 1
, Mátyás Domokos
†1
and István Szöllősi
‡2,1
1
MTA Rényi Institute, 1053 Budapest, Reáltanoda utca 13-15,
Hungary
2
Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Babeş-Bolyai
University, str. M. Kogălniceanu, nr. 1, 400084, Cluj-Napoca,
Romania
Abstract
The computation of the Noether numbers of all groups of order less
than thirty-two is completed. It turns out that for these groups in nonmodular characteristic the Noether number is attained on a multiplicity
free representation, it is strictly monotone on subgroups and factor groups,
and it does not depend on the characteristic. Algorithms are developed
and used to determine the small and large Davenport constants of these
groups. For each of these groups the Noether number is greater than the
small Davenport constant, whereas the first example of a group whose
Noether number exceeds the large Davenport constant is found, answering
partially a question posed by Geroldinger and Grynkiewicz.
2010 MSC: 13A50 (Primary) 20D60 (Secondary)
Keywords: polynomial invariant, product-one sequence, degree bound,
Noether number, Davenport constant
1
1.1
Introduction
The Noether number
Fix a base field F and a finite group G. Given a G-module V (i.e. a finite
dimensional F-vector space V together with an action of G via linear transformations) there is an induced action of G on the symmetric tensor algebra
S(V ) by F-algebra automorphisms. More concretely, S(V ) can be identified
with the polynomial algebra F[x1 , . . . , xn ] where x1 , . . . , xn is a basis of V , on
∗ Email: [email protected]
Partially supported by National Research, Development and Innovation Office, NKFIH grants
PD113138, ERC HU 15 118286 and K115799.
† Email: [email protected]
Supported by National Research, Development and Innovation Office, NKFIH K 119934.
‡ Email: [email protected]
Supported by ERC-AdG 321104 and GTC-31816 (Babeş-Bolyai University grant).
1
which G acts via linear substitutions of the variables. Noether [27] proved that
the algebra
S(V )G = {f ∈ S(V ) : g · f = f for all g ∈ G}
of polynomial invariants is generated by finitely many homogeneous elements.
Denote by β(S(V )G ) the minimal non-negative integer d such that S(V )G is
generated by its homogeneous components of degree at most d. Here we refer
to the standard grading on S(V ), so the variables xi all have degree one. The
Noether number of G is
β F (G) = sup{β(S(V )G ) : V is a G-module}.
The following general facts are well known:
(
=∞
when char(F) | |G|
F
β (G)
≤ |G| when char(F) ∤ |G|;
(1)
(see [29] for the case char(F) | |G|, [26] for the case char(F) = 0 and [14], [15]
for the case 0 < char(F) ∤ |G|).
From now on we assume that F is a fixed base field with char(F) ∤ |G|, and
write β(G) := β F (G) by suppressing from the notation the dependence of the
Noether number on F. It is well known that the Noether number is unchanged
when we extend the base field (see Subsection 4.3 for more information), so we
may assume in proofs that F is algebraically closed.
The exact value of the Noether number is known only for a very limited class
of groups. First of all, we have
β(G) = D(G) for abelian G
(2)
where D(G) is the Davenport constant (the maximal length of an irreducible
zero-sum sequence over G); this observation was used first in [30]. The exact
value of D(G) is known among others for abelian p-groups and for abelian groups
of rank at most two. Considering non-abelian groups, the Noether number of
the dihedral groups was determined in [30] (and in [32] for non-modular positive
characteristic) along with the Noether numbers of the quaternion group of order
8 and the alternating group A4 . Recent works of the first two authors of the
present paper (see [7], [8], [4], [5], [10]) added a few more (series) of groups to
this short list. These results indicated that a complete table of the Noether
numbers of “small” groups might be within reach. It turned out that indeed,
the reduction lemmas from [7] and considerations similar to the methods used
in the above mentioned papers are sufficient to determine the Noether numbers
for all groups of order less than 32. Note that the number of non-abelian groups
of order 32 is 44. This explains our choice of limiting the scope of this paper to
the groups of order less than 32.
1.2
The Davenport constants
Equality (2) inspired Geroldinger and Grynkiewicz [18] to look for an analogue
in the case of non-abelian groups. By a sequence over the finite group G we
mean a finite sequence of elements from G which is unordered and repetition of
terms is allowed. A sequence is product-one if the product of its elements in an
2
appropriate order is 1G . A sequence is product-one free if it has no product-one
subsequences. The small Davenport constant d(G) was defined in [28] as the
maximal length of a product-one free sequence. A sequence is considered as
an element of the free abelian monoid F (G) and product-one sequences form a
submonoid B(G) of F (G). The large Davenport constant D(G) was defined in
[18] as the maximal length of an atom (irreducible element) in B(G). We have
the inequality
d(G) + 1 ≤ D(G)
with equaliy for abelian G. The question whether β(G) is always between d(G)+
1 and D(G) was raised in [18] (the possible relation between the Noether number
and Davenport constants is discussed further in [10]). Using the implementation
of our algorithms presented in Section 6 we completed the determination of d(G)
and D(G) for groups of order less than 32. It turned out that d(G)+1 ≤ β(G) ≤
D(G) holds for these groups with the only exception being the Heisenberg group
H27 of order 27, for which we have β(H27 ) > D(H27 ).
1.3
Outline of the paper
In Section 2 we give a table containing the values of the Noether number and
the Davenport constants for each non-abelian group of order less than 32. In
Section 3 we provide references and proofs to verify the Noether numbers in
the table. We draw consequences from the obtained data and state some open
questions in Section 4. In particular, in non-modular characteristic for each
group of order less than 32 the Noether number is attained on a multiplicity
free representation (see Theorem 4.2), the Noether number is strictly monotone
with respect to taking subgroups or factor groups (see Theorem 4.5, which
is generalized to arbitrary finite groups in the subsequent paper [9]) and the
Noether number does not depend on the characteristic (see Theorem 4.7). In
Section 5 we turn to the Davenport constants. Notation and known results are
recalled in Sections 5.1 and 5.2. In Section 5.3 we present a theoretical proof
for the fact that D(H27 ) = 8; this seems to be of special interest because so
far this is the only known example of a group for which the Noether number is
greater than the large Davenport constant. Section 6 contains the description
of the algorithms we employed to compute the Davenport constants given in the
table in Section 2.
2
Noether numbers and Davenport constants
The classification of all groups of order less than 32 is given e.g. in [24, Chapter 22]. In the table below we present the Noether numbers and Davenport
constants of all the non-abelian groups of order less than 32. In the first
column we also give for reference the GAP (see [16]) identification numbers
(m, n) using which these groups can be constructed in GAP by the function call
SmallGroup(m,n).
3
GAP
G
(6, 1)
S3 = Dih6
Dih8
(8, 3)
(8, 4)
Q8 = Dic8
(10, 1)
Dih10
Dic12 = C3 ⋊ C4
(12, 1)
(12, 3)
A4
(12, 4)
Dih12
Dih14
(14, 1)
(16, 3) (C2 × C2 ) ⋊ C4 = (C4 × C2 ) ⋊ψ C2
C4 ⋊ C4
(16, 4)
(16, 6)
M16
(16, 7)
Dih16
SD16
(16, 8)
(16, 9)
Dic16
(16, 11)
Dih8 × C2 = (C4 × C2 ) ⋊−1 C2
Q8 × C2
(16, 12)
(16, 13)
(P auli) = (C4 × C2 ) ⋊φ C2
(18, 1)
Dih18
(18, 3)
S3 × C3
(18, 4)
(C3 × C3 ) ⋊−1 C2
Dic20
(20, 1)
(20, 3)
C5 ⋊ C4
(20, 4)
Dih20
C7 ⋊ C3
(21, 1)
(22, 1)
Dih22
C3 ⋊ C8
(24, 1)
(24, 3)
SL2 (F3 ) = Ã4
Dic24 = C3 ⋊ Q8
(24, 4)
(24, 5)
Dih6 × C4
(24, 6)
Dih24
Dic12 × C2
(24, 7)
(24, 8)
C3 ⋊ Dih8 = (C6 × C2 ) ⋊γ C2
(24, 10)
Dih8 × C3
Q8 × C3
(24, 11)
(24, 12)
S4
(24, 13)
A4 × C2
(24, 14)
Dih12 × C2 = (C6 × C2 ) ⋊−1 C2
(26, 1)
Dih26
H27 = U T3 (F3 )
(27, 3)
(27, 4)
M27 = C9 ⋊ C3
(28, 1)
Dic28 = C7 ⋊ C4
Dih28
(28, 3)
(30, 1)
Dih6 × C5
Dih10 × C3
(30, 2)
(30, 3)
Dih30
d
3
4
4
5
6
4
6
7
5
6
8
8
8
8
5
5
5
9
7
5
10
7
10
8
11
12
7
12
12
12
8
7
12
12
6
7
7
13
6
10
14
14
15
15
15
β
4
5
6
6
8
6
7
8
6
7
9
9
9
10
6
7
7
10
8
6
12
8
11
9
12
13
12
14
13
13
9
9
13
13
9
8
8
14
9
11
16
15
16
16
16
D
reference for β
6
[8, Theorem 10.3]
6
[8, Theorem 10.3]
6
[8, Theorem 10.3]
10
[8, Theorem 10.3]
9
[8, Theorem 10.3]
7
[7, Theorem 3.4]
9
[8, Theorem 10.3]
14
[8, Theorem 10.3]
7
Proposition 3.10
8
Proposition 3.1
10
[8, Theorem 10.3]
12
[8, Theorem 10.3]
12
[8, Theorem 10.3]
12
[8, Theorem 10.3]
7
[8, Corollary 5.5]
7
Proposition 3.2
7
[10, Example 5.4]
18
[8, Theorem 10.3]
10
Proposition 3.3
10
[8, Corollary 5.5]
15
[8, Theorem 10.3]
10 [7, Proposition 3.2]
15
[8, Theorem 10.3]
14 [7, Proposition 2.24]
22
[8, Theorem 10.3]
15
[8, Theorem 10.3]
13
[7, Corollary 3.6]
18
[8, Theorem 10.3]
15
[8, Theorem 10.3]
18
[8, Theorem 10.3]
11
Proposition 3.4
14
Proposition 3.5
14
[8, Theorem 10.3]
14
[8, Theorem 10.3]
12
[10, Example 5.3]
10
Proposition 3.8
10
[8, Corollary 5.5]
26
[8, Theorem 10.3]
8
[5, Corollary 15]
12
[8, Remark 10.4]
21
[8, Theorem 10.3]
21
[8, Theorem 10.3]
18
[8, Theorem 10.3]
20
[8, Theorem 10.3]
30
[8, Theorem 10.3]
In this table S3 and S4 are the symmetric groups of degree 3 and 4, Q8 is
the quaternion group of order 8, A4 is the alternating group of degree 4 and Ã4
4
is the binary tetrahedral group, H27 is the Heisenberg group of order 27 (i.e.
the group of unitriangular 3 × 3 matrices over the 3-element field). For m ≥ 2,
Dih2m is the dihedral group of order 2m, Dic4m is the dicyclic group given by
generators and relations
Dic4m := ha, b | a2m = 1,
b 2 = am ,
bab−1 = a−1 i.
Using for the semidirect product of two cyclic groups the notation
Cm ⋊d Cn = ha, b | am = 1, bn = 1, bab−1 = ad i
where d ∈ N is coprime to m
we have that SD2k is the semidihedral group
d = 2k−2 − 1 (k ≥ 4),
SD2k = C2k−1 ⋊d C2 ,
and for a prime p and k ≥ 3,
Mpk = Cpk−1 ⋊d Cp ,
d = pk−2 + 1.
Moreover, the symbol ⋊ always stands for a semidirect product that is not a
direct product.
3
Noether numbers
3.1
Abelian groups
It has been long known that for an abelian group G we have d(G) + 1 = β(G) =
D(G), see [10] for a recent survey largely motivated by this fact. Therefore we
can restate known results on the Davenport constants of abelian groups in terms
of the Noether number:
• if G is cyclic then β(G) = |G| (see for example [30]);
• if G is of rank two, i.e. G = Cn ×Cm for some m | n then β(G) = n+m−1
(see for example [19, Theorem 5.8.3]);
Pr
• if G is a p-group, i.e. G = Cpn1 × . . .× Cpnr then β(G) = 1 + i=1 (pni − 1)
(see for example [19, Theorem 5.5.9]);
• if G = C2 × C2 × C2n then D(G) = 2n + 2 by [13].
All abelian groups of order less than 32 fall under one of the four cases above.
We note that more recent progress on the Davenport constants of abelian groups
can be found in [1], [17, Corollary 4.2.13], [31], [2].
3.2
Groups with a cyclic subgroup of index two
Let G be a non-cyclic group having a cyclic subgroup of index two. According
to [8, Theorem 10.3] we have
(
2 if G = Dic4m , m > 1;
1
(3)
β(G) = |G| +
2
1 otherwise.
Formula (3) yields the Noether number for 27 groups out of the 45 groups from
the table in Section 2.
5
3.3
The generalized dihedral groups
The semi-direct product Dih(A) := A ⋊−1 C2 , where A is an abelian group
on which C2 acts by inversion, is called the generalized dihedral group obtained
from A. According to [8, Corollary 5.5] we have
β(Dih(A)) = D(A) + 1.
(4)
Combining this with the known values of Davenport constants given in Section 3.1 we can compute the Noether number of the three generalized dihedral
groups of order less than 32 which are not themselves dihedral groups (these are
(C4 ×C2 )⋊−1 C2 = Dih8 ×C2 , (C3 ×C3 )⋊−1 C2 , (C6 ×C2 )⋊−1 C2 = Dih12 ×C2 ).
3.4
Cases when the reduction lemmas give exact results
The kth Noether number βk (S(V )G ) (where k is a positive integer) was defined
k+1
in [7, Section 1.2] as the top degree of the factor space S(V )G /(S(V )G
,
+)
G
where S(V )+ stands for the sum of the positive degree homogeneous components of S(V )G . The supremum of βk (S(V ))G as V ranges over all G-modules
over F is denoted by βk (G) (for an abelian group G, βk (G) equals the kth
Davenport constant Dk (G) introduced in [22]). In the special case k = 1 we
have β1 (S(V )G ) = β(S(V )G ) and hence β1 (G) = β(G). Using the kth Noether
number one can get upper bounds on β(G) by the following reduction lemma:
β(G) ≤ ββ(G/N ) (N )
for N ⊳ G by [7, Lemma 1.4].
(5)
Lower bounds on β(G) can be derived from the following inequality:
β(G) ≥ β(G/N ) + β(N ) − 1
if G/N is abelian by [8, Theorem 4.3].
(6)
These results already suffice to establish the precise value of the Noether number
for several groups considered below when we combine them with the following
formula for the kth Noether number:
βk (Cn × Cm ) = nk + m − 1 for m | n by [22, Proposition 5].
(7)
Proposition 3.1. β(C4 ⋊ C4 ) = 7.
Proof. We have the lower bound β(C4 ⋊ C4 ) ≥ 2β(C4 ) − 1 = 7 by (6). On the
other hand G = C4 ⋊ C4 contains a normal subgroup isomorphic to the Klein
four-group K4 = C2 × C2 such that G/K4 ∼
= K4 . Hence by (5) and (7) we have
β(G) ≤ ββ(K4 ) (K4 ) = 7.
Proposition 3.2. β(Q8 × C2 ) = 7.
Proof. We have the lower bound β(Q8 × C2 ) ≥ β(Q8 ) + β(C2 ) − 1 = 7 by (6)
since β(Q8 ) = 6 by [30, Lemma 10.1]. On the other hand G has a normal
subgroup K4 such that G/K4 ∼
= K4 . Hence again β(G) ≤ ββ(K4 ) (K4 ) = 7 by
(5) and (7).
Proposition 3.3. β(S3 × C3 ) = 8.
Proof. We have β(S3 × C3 ) = β(C3 ⋊−1 C6 ) ≥ β(C3 ) + β(C6 ) − 1 = 8 by (6)
and the upper bound β(S3 × C3 ) ≤ β2 (C3 × C3 ) = 8 by (5) and (7).
6
Proposition 3.4. β(Dic12 × C2 ) = 9.
Proof. We have β(Dic12 ×C2 ) ≥ β(Dic12 )+β(C2 )−1 = 8+2−1 = 9 by (6) and
(3). On the other hand the center of the group G = Dic12 × C2 is isomorphic
to the Klein four-group K4 = C2 × C2 and we have G/K4 ∼
= Dih6 . So we get
β(G) ≤ ββ(Dih6 ) (K4 ) = β4 (K4 ) = 2 · 4 + 1 = 9 by (3), (5) and (7).
Proposition 3.5. β(C3 ⋊ Dih8 ) = 9.
Proof. The group G has an index two subgroup N ∼
= C3 ⋊ C4 = Dic12 . By (3)
we have β(N ) = 12 |N | + 2 = 8, implying by (6) that β(G) ≥ 8 + 2 − 1 = 9.
For the reverse inequality observe that the kernel of the action of Dih8 on
C3 is isomorphic to the Klein group K4 = C2 × C2 . So the subgroup K4 ≤ Dih8
is normal in G and as Dih8 /K4 ∼
=
= C2 acts by inversion on C3 we have G/K4 ∼
Dih6 . Therefore β(G) ≤ ββ(Dih6 ) (K4 ) = β4 (K4 ) = 2 · 4 + 1 = 9 by (3), (5) and
(7).
Example 3.6. For later reference let us construct here a representation of
G = C3 ⋊ Dih8 (where the kernel of the conjugation action of Dih8 on C3 is
isomorphic to C2 × C2 ) on which the Noether number is attained. Consider the
two-dimensional G-module U = F2 on which the representation is given by the
matrices
0 1
−1 0
ζ 0
a=
, b=
, c=
1 0
0 1
0 ζ2
where ζ is a primitive third root of unity. Here ha, bi ∼
= Dih8 , ca = c−1 and cb =
c, so these matrices are indeed generating the group in question. Since this group
is generated also by the pseudo-reflections a, b, and ac, the G-module structure
of S(U ) is well known by the Shephard-Todd-Chevalley theorem [3], [33]. In
particular, S(U )G = F[x, y]G is a polynomial ring generated by (xy)2 , x6 +
y 6 . The element x7 y − xy 7 is not contained in the ideal of S(U ) generated
by the above two invariants. It spans a one-dimensional G-invariant subspace
isomorphic to the one-dimensional G-module Fχ corresponding to the order two
homomorphism χ : G → F× given by the determinant on GL(U ). It follows
that in S(U ⊕ Fχ ) the element (x7 y − xy 7 )z is an indecomposable G-invariant,
where z spans the summand Fχ .
3.5
Some groups with an abelian normal subgroup of index two or three
In this section we shall discuss a group G with an abelian normal subgroup
A of index 2 or 3. Let V be a G-module over an algebraically closed base
field F. We shall fix the following notation: I := S(V )A , R := S(V )G . By
Clifford theory we know that each irreducible G-module is 1-dimensional or
is induced from a 1-dimensional A-module. Therefore it is possible to choose
the variables in S(V ) to be A-eigenvectors that are permuted up to scalars
by the action of G. We shall tacitly assume that the variables were chosen
that way. It follows that I is spanned by A-invariant monomials, permuted
by G up to scalars. It will be convenient to use the notation f g = g −1 · f
for g ∈ G and f ∈ S(V ). For a non-zero scalar multiple x of a variable let
b its weight (i.e. xa = (θ(x)(a))x ∈ Fx for all a ∈ A).
us denote by θ(x) ∈ A
b
Here A is the character group of A, i.e. the abelian group consisting of the
7
b ∼
group homomorphisms A → F× . Note that A
= A when F is algebraically
closed. For a non-zero scalar multiple w of a monomial y1 . . . yd the multiset
Φ(w) = {θ(y1 ), . . . , θ(yd )} is called the weight sequence of w. It is a sequence
b (where the order of the elements in a sequence is
over the abelian group A
b form a monoid with
disregarded and repetition is allowed). Sequences over A
multiplication denoted by “·” (see Section 5 for more discussion of this monoid),
such that for monomials w, w′ we have Φ(ww′ ) = Φ(w) · Φ(w′ ). The action of G
b by θg (a) = θ(gag −1 ). For a variable
on A by conjugation induces an action on A
g
x, g ∈ G and a ∈ A we have that x is a non-zero scalar multiple of a variable,
−1
and (xg )a = (xgag )g = (θ(x)(gag −1 )x)g = θ(x)g (a)xg , showing the equality
g
g
θ(x ) = θ(x) . Consequently, for a non-zero scalar multiple w of a monomial
b is extended componentwise
we have Φ(wg ) = Φ(w)g where the action of G on A
G
b
to sequences
over A. Denote by τ = τA : I → R the relative transfer map
P
f 7→ g∈G/A f g . It is a surjective R-module homomorphism, preserving the
grading (inherited from the standard grading on the polynomial ring S(V )).
The following lemma provides the common basis for the proofs of the upper
bounds for Noether numbers below:
b with |S| > d
Lemma 3.7. Suppose that for any zero-sum sequence S over A
which does not factor as the product of 1+[G : A] non-empty zero-sum sequences,
we have a factorization S = S1 · S2 as the product of two zero-sum sequences
satisfying the following: for each g ∈ G \ A, the sequence S1 · S2g factors as
the product of 1 + [G : A] non-empty zero-sum sequences. Then we have the
inequality β(G) ≤ d.
Proof. By Proposition 1.5 in [7], in order to prove β(S(V )G ) ≤ d it is sufficient
to show that I≥d+1 ⊆ I+ R+ where I≥d+1 stands for the sum of homogeneous
components of I of degree at least d + 1. That is, we need to show that any Ainvariant monomial w with deg(w) > d belongs to I+ R+ . So take an arbitrary
A-invariant monomial with deg(w) > d, and denote by S its weight sequence
Φ(w). If S factors into a product of 1 + [G : A] zero-sum sequences, then
w factors as the product of 1 + [G : A] non-trivial A-invariant monomials.
Thus w ∈ (I+ )1+[G:A] . On the other hand by Proposition 1.6 in [7] we have
(I+ )1+[G:A] ⊆ I+ R+ , implying in turn that w ∈ I+ R+ . Next, suppose that S
does not factor as the product of 1 + [G : A] non-empty zero-sum sequences.
Then by assumption we have a factorization S = S1 · S2 with the properties
in the statement. The monomial w factorizes as w = w1 w2 with Φ(w1 ) = S1 ,
Φ(w2 ) = S2 . We have the equality
X
w = w1 τ (w2 ) −
w1 w2g ,
where the summation above ranges over a set of representatives of the A-cosets
in G which are different from A. For each such summand, Φ(w1 w2g ) = S1 · S2g
factors as the product of 1 + [G : A] non-empty zero-sum sequences, so w1 w2g ∈
(I+ )1+[G:A] ⊆ I+ R+ . The first summand w1 τ (w2 ) above is also contained in
I+ R+ since τ (w2 ) ∈ R+ , implying in turn that w ∈ I+ R+ . Thus we showed
I≥d+1 ⊆ I+ R+ .
Proposition 3.8. β(A4 × C2 ) = 8.
Proof. First we show the inequality β(A4 ×C2 ) ≤ 8. We have A4 = K⋊hgi where
K∼
= C2 ×C2 and hgi ∼
= C3 , so G := A4 ×C2 contains an abelian normal subgroup
8
A = K × C2 , where g centralizes the last summand C2 , and conjugation by g
b additively,
gives an order 3 automorphism of K. Write the character group A
and denote its elements by {(0, ε), (a, ε), (b, ε), (c, ε) | ε = 0, 1}, where (0, 0)
is the zero element, {(a, 0), (b, 0), (c, 0), (0, 0)} is a subgroup, and the action
b given by (a, ε)g = (b, ε), (b, ε)g = (c, ε),
of hgi on A induces the action on A
g
(c, ε) = (a, ε). We shall apply Lemma 3.7, so take a zero-sum sequence S over
b with |S| ≥ 9, such that S does not factor as the product of four non-empty
A
b Since β2 (A) = 7 by Lemma 3.7 in [11], 0 does not
zero-sum sequences over A.
occur in S (otherwise S = {0} · T and |T | ≥ 8 > β2 (A) = 7 implies that T
is the product of three non-empty zero-sum sequences, a contradiction). On
b \ {(0, 0)}| implies that S contains an element
the other hand, |S| > 7 = |A
s with multiplicity at least 2, hence S = T0 · T , where T0 , T are zero-sum
sequences, T0 = {s, s} has length 2, so |T | ≥ 7. Note that T does not contain
a zero-sum subsequence of length 2 (since otherwise D(A) = 4 would imply
that S is the product of four non-empty zero-sum sequences). It follows that
b (each having multiplicity one), and so
T consists of the non-zero elements in A
T = T1 T2 where T1 = {(a, 1), (b, 0), (c, 0), (0, 1)}, T2 = {(a, 0), (b, 1), (c, 1)}. Set
S1 := T0 ·T1 and S2 := T2 . The factorization S = S1 ·S2 fulfills the requirements
of Lemma 3.7: indeed, (a, 1) = (c, 1)g occurs both in S1 and S2g , so S can be
written as S = T0 · {(a, 1), (a, 1)} · U where U is a zero-sum sequence of length
5. Hence by D(A) = 4 we get that S1 · S2g factors as the product of four non2
2
empty zero-sum sequences. Similarly, (a, 1) = (b, 1)g occurs also in S2g , hence
2
S1 · S2g also factors as the product of four non-empty zero-sum sequences. By
Lemma 3.7 we conclude that β(G) ≤ 8.
The subgroup K is normal in G and G/K ∼
= C6 , hence by (6) we obtain the
reverse inequality β(G) ≥ β(K) + β(C6 ) − 1 = 3 + 6 − 1 = 8.
Example 3.9. For later use we present a concrete A4 ×C2 -module on which the
Noether number is attained. We keep the notation used in the proof of Proposition 3.8. Let W be the 3-dimensional irreducible A4 -module (the non-trivial
direct summand in the 4-dimensional standard permutation representation of
A4 ) viewed as a G-module under the natural surjection G → A4 with kernel C2 .
Let U be the non-trivial 1-dimensional C2 -module viewed as a G-module under
the natural surjection G → C2 with kernel A4 . Set V := W ⊕(W ⊗U )⊕U . Then
S(V ) = F[x1 , x2 , x3 , y1 , y2 , y3 , z] where x1 , x2 , x3 are A-eigenvectors with weight
(a, 0), (b, 0), (c, 0) and they are permuted cyclically by g. Similarly y1 , y2 , y3 are
A-eigenvectors with weight (a, 1), (b, 1), (c, 1) and they are permuted cyclically
by g. The last variable z is fixed by g and is an A-eigenvector with weight (0, 1).
2
Denote by τ = τAG : I → R the relative transfer map f 7→ f + f g + f g . Then
R is spanned as an F-vector space by τ (w) where w ranges over the A-invariant
monomials. There is an N3 -grading on F[V ] given by
deg3 (xa1 1 xa2 2 xa3 3 y1b1 y2b2 y3b3 z d ) := (a1 + a2 + a3 , b1 + b2 + b3 , d).
This is preserved by the action of G, hence I and R are N3 -graded subalgebras.
Moreover, τ preserves the N3 -grading. We claim that τ (x31 x32 y3 z) is indecomposable, that is, it is not contained in (R+ )2 . Suppose to the contrary that
τ (x31 x32 y3 z) is a linear combination of elements of the form τ (w)τ (w′ ) where w
and w′ are non-trivial A-invariant monomials and deg3 (w)+deg 3 (w′ ) = (6, 1, 1).
9
There is no A-invariant variable in F[V ], so both w and w′ above have total degree at least 2. The hgi-orbits of the A-invariant monomials w with
deg3 (w) = (∗, ∗, 1), deg3 (w) 6= (6, 1, 1) and where deg3 (w) is dominated by
(6, 1, 1) are
x1 x2 y3 z, x31 x2 y3 z, x1 x32 y3 z, x1 x2 x23 y3 z.
The G-invariants of degree 2 or 4 depending only on x1 , x2 , x3 are
τ (x21 ) = x21 + x22 + x23 ,
τ (x21 x22 ) = x21 x22 + x21 x23 + x22 x23 ,
τ (x41 ) = x41 + x42 + x43 .
It follows that
τ (x31 x32 y3 z) = τ (x1 x2 y3 z)(λ1 τ (x41 ) + λ2 τ (x21 x22 ))
+ τ (x21 )(µ1 τ (x31 x2 y3 z) + µ2 τ (x1 x32 y3 z) + µ3 τ (x1 x2 x23 y3 z))
for some λ1 , λ2 , µ1 , µ2 , µ3 ∈ F. Comparing the coefficients of x51 x2 y3 z, x1 x52 y3 z,
x1 x2 x43 y3 z, x1 x32 x23 y3 z we conclude
0 = λ1 + µ1 = λ1 + µ2 = λ1 + µ3 = λ2 + µ2 + µ3 .
It follows that the coefficient λ2 + µ1 + µ2 of x31 x32 y3 z on the right hand side
is 0, whereas on the left hand side it is 1. This contradiction implies that
τ (x31 x32 y3 z) ∈
/ (R+ )2 , hence β(S(V )G ) ≥ 8.
Proposition 3.10. β((C2 × C2 ) ⋊ C4 ) = 6.
Proof. We have G = (C2 × C2 ) ⋊ hgi where hgi ∼
= C4 . The group G contains
the abelian normal subgroup A := C2 × C2 × hg 2 i. We use the same notation
b as in the proof of Proposition 3.8. The action of hgi on A
b
for the elements of A
is given by
(a, ε)g = (b, ε),
(b, ε)g = (a, ε),
(c, ε)g = (c, ε),
(0, ε)g = (0, ε)
for ε = 0, 1.
b with |S| ≥ 7 which is not the product of
Take a zero-sum sequence S over A
three non-empty zero-sum sequences. Since D(A) = 4 by Lemma 3.7 in [11], S
has no zero-sum subsequence of length at most 2. It follows that S consists of the
b (each element having multiplicity 1), hence S = S1 · S2
non-zero elements of A
where S1 = {(b, 0), (b, 1), (0, 1)} and S2 = {(a, 0), (a, 1), (c, 0), (c, 1)}. We have
that
S1 · S2g = {(b, 0), (b, 0)} · {(b, 1), (b, 1)} · {(c, 0), (c, 1), (0, 1)}
is the product of 3 = 1+[G : A] zero-sum sequences. By Lemma 3.7 we conclude
the desired inequality β(G) ≤ 6.
On the other hand β(G) ≥ β(C2 × C2 )+ β(C4 )− 1 = 3 + 4 − 1 = 6 by (6).
Example 3.11. For later use we present a G-module on which the Noether
number of the group G = (C2 × C2 ) ⋊ C4 is attained. Consider the G-module
V = F4 on which the action is given by the matrices
0 1 0 0
−1 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 −1 0 0
a=
0 0 1 0 , b = 0 0 1 0 , c = 0 0 ω 0
0 0 0 ω
0 0 0 −1
0 0 0 −1
10
where ω is a primitive fourth root of unity. Then a, b generate a subgroup of
GL(V ) isomorphic to C2 × C2 , c4 is the identity matrix, and conjugation by
c interchanges a and b. So G can be identified with the subgroup of GL(F4 )
generated by a, b, c. Moreover, the 2 × 2 upper left blocks of a, b, c give the
reflection representation of G = G/hc2 i ∼
= Dih8 on W = F2 ⊂ V . Denote by
x, y, z, w the standard basis vectors in V = F4 , so W = SpanF {x, y}, S(V ) =
F[x, y, z, w] and S(W ) = F[x, y]. We claim that the G-invariant
xy(x2 − y 2 )zw
b given by
in F[x, y, z, w]G is indecomposable. Consider the characters χ, ψ ∈ G
χ(a) = χ(b) = χ(c) = −1,
ψ1 (a) = ψ1 (b) = 1, ψ1 (c) = ω,
ψ2 (a) = ψ2 (b) = −1, ψ2 (c) = ω
and Fχ , Fψ1 , Fψ2 the corresponding one-dimensional G-modules. Clearly we
have the G-module isomorphisms
Fz ∼
= F ψ1 ,
Fw ∼
= F ψ2 ,
Fxy(x2 − y 2 ) ∼
= Fχ .
Since c restricts to an order two transformation of W , the modules Fψ1 , Fψ2 and
their duals do not occur as a summand in S(W ), it follows that S(V )G contains
no element that has degree 1 in z and degree 0 in w, and S(V )G contains no
element that has degree 1 in w and degree 0 in z. The equalities ψ1 ψ2 = χ
and χ2 = 1 show that the elements of S(V )G having degree 1 both in z and w
are exactly the elements of the form zwh where h ∈ S(W ) and Fh ∼
= Fχ . The
G-module structure of S(W ) and the structure of S(V )G ∩ S(W ) = S(W )G is
well known from the Shephard-Todd-Chevalley Theorem [3], [33]. We infer that
Fχ occurs with multiplicity one in the degree 4 component of S(W ), namely as
the subspace spanned by xy(x2 − y 2 ), and does not occur in lower degrees. This
clearly implies that xy(x2 − y 2 )zw is indecomposable in S(V )G .
4
4.1
Observations and open questions
The Noether number and multiplicity free representations
When char(F) = 0, it was shown in [30] that as a consequence of Weyl’s Theorem
on polarizations, β(G) is attained on the regular representation of G, which
contains each irreducible G-module with multiplicity equal to its dimension
(see [25] for a variant of Weyl’s Theorem [35] valid in positive non-modular
characteristic). However for the small groups studied here, the Noether number
is usually attained on some G-modules of much smaller dimensions. Recall that a
G-module V is multiplicity free if it is the direct sum of pairwise non-isomorphic
irreducible G-modules.
To deal with some particular cases below, we need first to state explicitly
the following corollary of the proof of the inequality (6) given in [8]:
Lemma 4.1. Let N be a normal subgroup of G with G/N abelian. For any
N -module W there exists a multiplicity free G/N -module U such that
G
N
β(S(U ⊕ IndG
N W ) ) ≥ β(S(W ) ) + D(G/N ) − 1.
11
In particular, if β(S(W )N ) = β(N ), β(G) = β(N ) + D(G/N ) − 1, IndG
N (W ) is
multiplicity free and has no summand on which N acts trivially, then β(G) is
attained on a multiplicity free G-module.
Theorem 4.2. There exists a multiplicity free G-module V such that β(G) =
β(S(V )G ) in each of the following cases:
1. G is abelian;
2. G has a cyclic subgroup of index two;
3. G has order less than 32.
Proof. It is sufficient to prove our claim in the case when F is algebraically
closed, so let us assume this.
b the group of characters
1. The case when G is abelian is known. Denote by G
×
b
(G → F homomorphisms) of G, and for χ ∈ G let Fχ be the 1-dimensional
G-module on which G acts via χ. It is well known (see for example Proposition
b of length
4.7 in [10]) that if there exists an irreducible zero-sum sequence over G
b with components in {χ1 , . . . , χk } ⊆ G,
b then β(G) = β(S(Lk Fχi )G ).
D(G)
i=1
2. For the dicyclic groups G = Dic4m (where m > 1) we gave an example
in the proof of Proposition 9.1 in [8] of a 2-dimensional irreducible G-module V
with β(S(V )Dic4m ) = 2m + 2.
Let G be a non-abelian group with a cyclic subgroup N of index two, and let
b . Then IndG Fχ is a 2-dimensional irreducible G-module,
χ be a generator of N
N
and so the module U ⊕ IndG
N Fχ from Lemma 4.1 is multiplicity free (being
the direct sum of a 2-dimensional irreducible and the non-trivial 1-dimensional
1
G
module). Moreover, we have β(S(U ⊕ IndG
N Fχ ) ) ≥ β(N ) + 1 = 2 |G| + 1, and
1
2 |G| + 1 = β(G) unless G is dicyclic.
3. Similar argument works for C7 ⋊ C3 , C5 ⋊ C4 , and M27 : let N be a
b.
maximal cyclic normal subgroup of the given group, and χ a generator of N
G
Then IndN Fχ is an irreducible G-module of dimension |G/N |, and we are done
by Lemma 4.1, taking into account the known value of β(G) from Section 2.
Now suppose that G = A⋊−1 C2 is a generalized dihedral group with A being
b such
a non-trivial abelian group. Take a minimal subset Λ = {χ1 , . . . , χr } ⊂ A
b contains an atom of length D(A),
b all of whose components belong to
that B(A)
Λ. By minimality of Λ, it does not contain the trivial character, and if χ and
χ−1 both belong to Λ, then χ = χ−1 . If χ 6= χ−1 , then IndG
A Fχ is irreducible and
as an A-module is isomorphic to Fχ ⊕ Fχ−1 , whereas if χ = χ−1 is non-trivial,
then IndG
A Fχ is the direct sum of two non-isomorphic 1-dimensional G-modules,
which as A-modules are isomorphic to Fχ . It follows that for W = Fχ1 ⊕· · ·⊕Fχr
the G-module IndG
A W is multiplicity free and contains no summands on which
A acts trivially. Thus we are done by Lemma 4.1.
The groups Q8 × C2 , S3 × C3 , C4 ⋊ C4 , can also be settled by Lemma 4.1,
taking into account the known value of β(G) from Section 2. Indeed, for the
2-dimensional irreducible Q8 -module W we have β(S(W ))Q8 = 6 (see [30])
8 ×C2
and IndQ
is the direct sum of the two non-isomorphic irreducible twoQ8
dimensional Q8 × C2 -modules. Essentially the same argument can be used for
Dic12 × C2 : after inducing up to Dic12 × C2 the irreducible two-dimensional
Dic12 -module on which the Noether number is attained we get a direct sum
of two non-isomorphic irreducible Dic12 × C2 -modules. Note that S3 × C3 ∼
=
12
b3 we have that IndC3 ⋊C6 Fχ is the direct
C3 ⋊−1 C6 and for a non-trivial χ ∈ C
C3
sum of the three pairwise non-isomorphic irreducible 2-dimensional S3 × C3 b4 , we have that IndC4 ⋊C4 Fχ is the direct sum
modules. For a generator χ ∈ C
C4
of two non-isomorphic irreducible two-dimensional modules.
The cases of the groups C3 ⋊ Dih8 , A4 × C2 and (C2 × C2 ) ⋊−1 C4 were
settled in Example 3.6, Example 3.9 and Example 3.11.
An irreducible module on which the Noether number is attained is given
e4 in [7], for H27 in [5]. It was pointed out in
already in the literature for A4 , A
[10, Example 5.3 and 5.4] that the Noether number for S4 is attained on the
product of the standard four-dimensional permutation representation and the
sign representation, and for the Pauli group (C4 × C2 ) ⋊φ C2 on the direct sum
of the two-dimensional pseudo-reflection representation and a one-dimensional
representation (see also [6] for some details referred to in [10]).
Problem 4.3. Does there exist a group G for which β(S(V )G ) < β(G) for all
multiplicity free G-modules V ?
Remark 4.4. (i) By a theorem of Draisma, Kemper and Wehlau [12] the universal degree bound for separating invariants is known to be attained on multiplicity
free representations.
(ii) We mention a conjecture of Hunziker [23, Conjecture 5.1] made for reflection groups that has a similar flavor as the topic of Section 4.1.
4.2
The strict monotonicity of the Noether number
Since all G/N -modules can be viewed as G-modules, the inequality β(G/N ) ≤
β(G) holds for any normal subgroup N of any finite group G. It was proven by
B. Schmid [30] that β(H) ≤ β(G) for any subgroup H of G. We shall refer as
S and F for the following conditions on a finite group G:
S: β(H) < β(G) for each proper subgroup H of G.
F: β(G/N ) < β(G) for each non-trivial normal subgroup N of G.
It is shown in a subsequent paper [9] that conditions S and F (by generalizing
(6) for non-abelian N ) hold for all finite groups. We collect in Theorem 4.5
below facts on the properties S and F that can be read off from the results
obtained or quoted in the present paper.
Theorem 4.5. Condition S holds for any finite nilpotent group G. Moreover,
both S and F hold when
1. G is abelian;
2. G has a cyclic subgroup of index two;
3. G ∼
= Cp ⋊ Cq for odd primes p, q where q | p − 1;
4. G has order less than 32.
Proof. Suppose first that G is nilpotent, and let H be a proper subgroup of G.
It is well known that H is contained as a prime index normal subgroup in a
subgroup K of G, whence we have β(G) ≥ β(K) ≥ β(H) + [K : H] − 1 > β(H)
by (6). So S holds for G. Note that if G is abelian, then any factor group
13
of G is isomorphic to a subgroup of G, hence F follows from S. If G has a
cyclic subgroup of index two, then any subgroup or factor group of G has a
subgroup of index at most two as well, whence (3) shows that both S and F
hold. Any non-trivial subgroup or factor group of Cp ⋊ Cq has order p or q, and
β(Cp ⋊ Cq ) ≥ p + q − 1 by (6).
Assume finally that G is a non-abelian group of order less than 32 that
contains no cyclic subgroup of index two. Theorem 1.1 in [7] asserts that β(H) <
1
2 |H| unless H has a cyclic subgroup of index at most two, or H is isomorphic
to one of C2 × C2 × C2 , C3 × C3 , A4 , or Ã4 . Taking into account (3) and
the values of the Noether numbers of C2 × C2 × C2 , C3 × C3 , A4 and Ã4 ,
this implies that β(H) ≤ 2 + 12 |H| for any non-cyclic H, with equality only if
H ∼
= Dic4m is a dicyclic group. Since our G has no cyclic subgroups or factor
groups of order at least 21 |G|, we conclude that for any proper subgroup or
factor group H of G the inequality β(H) ≤ max{2 + 41 |G|, 31 |G|} holds, with
strict inequality unless H ∼
= Dic4m is a dicyclic group of order 12 |G| or H is a
1
cyclic group of order 3 |G|. This immediately implies that S and F hold for G
provided that β(G) > max{2 + 41 |G|, 31 |G|}. From now on assume in addition
that β(G) ≤ max{2 + 14 |G|, 31 |G|}. So G is one of the following groups from the
table in Section 2: the two groups of order 16 with Noether number 6, the group
of order 18 with Noether number 6, the two groups of order 24 with Noether
number 8, or the group of order 27 with Noether number 9. Now Dih8 × C2
has exactly four elements of order 4 and no element of order 8, consequently
does not have Q8 = Dic8 as a subgroup or a factor group, hence S and F hold
for this group. The group (C2 × C2 ) ⋊ C4 has C2 × C2 × C2 as a subgroup.
Therefore any order 8 subgroup or factor group of this group contains C2 × C2
as a subgroup, and hence it is not dicyclic. The group (C3 × C3 ) ⋊−1 C2 has no
element of order 6 and has no dicyclic subgroups or factor groups (as its order
is not divisible by 4). The groups A4 × C2 and Dih12 × C2 have no element
of order 8 and do not have a subgroup or factor group isomorphic to Dic12 (as
these groups do not have an element of order 4). Finally, the Heisenberg group
does not have an element of order 9. So S and F hold for all groups of order
less than 32.
4.3
Dependence on the characteristic
It is proved in [25, Corollary 4.2] that β F (G) may depend only on the characteristic of F, but not on F. Therefore we introduce the notation
β char(F) (G) = β F (G).
Moreover, by [25, Theorem 4.7] we have β p (G) ≥ β 0 (G) for all primes p, and
β p (G) = β 0 (G) holds for all but finitely many primes p. Knop remarks in [25]
that “Presently, no group G and prime p not dividing |G| with β p (G) > β 0 (G)
seems to be known”. This observation inspires the following question:
Problem 4.6. Does the equality β p (G) = β 0 (G) hold for all finite groups G
and primes p not dividing |G|?
The paper [34] reports as a folklore conjecture that for any permutation ZGmodule V (i.e. when V is a free Z-module with a basis preserved by the action
of G) we have β(S(F ⊗Z V )G ) = β(S(Q ⊗Z V )G ) provided that char(F) does
14
not divide |G|. We note that if this conjecture is true, then Problem 4.6 has a
positive answer. Indeed, it follows from [25, Theorem 6.1] and (1) that if p does
not divide |G| then β p (G) = β(S(F ⊗Z V )G ) where F is a field of characteristic
p and V is the direct sum of |G| copies of the regular G-module defined over Z
(hence in particular V is a permutation ZG-module).
In Theorem 4.7 below we collect the cases for which Problem 4.6 has a
positive answer by the results obtained or quoted in the present paper.
Theorem 4.7. The equality β p (G) = β(G) holds for all primes p not dividing
the order of G in each of the following cases:
1. G is abelian;
2. G has a cyclic subgroup of index two;
3. G has order less than 32.
Proof. It has been long known that if G is abelian then β p (G) = D(G) for all
p ∤ |G|. Formula (3) for the Noether number of a group with a cyclic subgroup
of index two is valid in all non-modular characteristic. Finally, the quantities
in the table in Section 2 are independent of the characteristic of the base field
(provided that it is non-modular), whence the statement holds also for the
remaining groups of order less than 32.
4.4
Further observations
Remark that the groups S3 × C3 and (C3 × C3 ) ⋊−1 C2 both have the structure
(C3 × C3 ) ⋊α C2 , the only difference being in the automorphism α. However,
their Noether numbers are different.
The groups Dih8 × C2 , (C2 × C2 ) ⋊ C4 and the Pauli group all have the
structural description (C4 × C2 )⋊α C2 , only the automorphism α being different
in the three cases. The Noether numbers of the first two are equal, and differ
from the Noether number of the third one.
This shows that it would be interesting to understand how β(A ⋊α B) depends on α.
5
5.1
Davenport constants
The monoid of product-one sequences
In this section we introduce further notation related to the small and large
Davenport constants of a not necessarily abelian finite group. We follow the
presentation of [10].
Let G0 ⊆ G be a non-empty subset of a finite group G. A sequence over G0
means a finite sequence of terms from G0 which is unordered, and repetition of
terms is allowed (in other words, a sequence over G0 is a multiset of elements
from G0 ). A sequence will be considered as an element of the free abelian
monoid F (G0 ) whose generators are identified with the elements of G0 . We use
the symbol “·” for the multiplication in the monoid F (G0 ) – this agrees with
the convention in the monographs [19, 21] – and we denote multiplication in G
by juxtaposition of elements. For example, considering elements g1 , g2 ∈ G0 we
15
have that g1 · g2 ∈ F (G0 ) is a sequence of length 2, while g1 g2 is an element
of G. Furthermore, we use brackets for the exponentiation in F (G0 ). So for
g ∈ G0 , S ∈ F (G0 ), and k ∈ N0 , we have
g [k] = g · . . . · g ∈ F (G)
| {z }
k
Let
and S [k] = |S · .{z
. . · S} ∈ F (G) .
k
S = g1 · . . . · g|S| =
Y
g [vg (S)]
g∈G0
be a sequence
over G0 ; here vg (S) is the multiplicity of g in S and we call
P
|S| = g∈G vg (S) the length of S. If vg (S) > 0, i.e. S = g · R for a sequence R
with |R| = |S| − 1, then we write
S · g [−1] = R
for the sequence obtained from S by removing one occurrence of g. More generally, we write R = S · T [−1] if we have S = R · T for some sequences R, S, T . The
identity element 1F (G0 ) in F (G0 ) is called the trivial sequence, and has length
|1F (G0 ) | = 0. We have the usual divisibility relation in the free abelian monoid
F (G0 ) and write T | S if T divides S. A divisor T of S will also be called a
subsequence of S. We call supp(S) = {g ∈ G0 | vg (S) > 0} ⊆ G0 the support of
S. The set of products of S is
π(S) = {gτ (1) . . . gτ (|S|) ∈ G | τ ∈ Sym{1, . . . , |S|}} ⊆ G
(if |S| = 0, we use the convention that π(S) = {1G }). Clearly, π(S) is contained in a G′ -coset, where G′ = [G, G] = hg −1 h−1 gh | g, h ∈ Gi denotes the
commutator subgroup of G. Set
[
π(T ) ⊆ G.
(8)
Π(S) =
T |S
1F(G0 ) 6=T
The sequence S is called a
• product-one sequence if 1G ∈ π(S),
• product-one free sequence if 1G ∈
/ Π(S).
The set
B(G0 ) = {S ∈ F (G0 ) : 1G ∈ π(S)}
of all product-one sequences over G0 is obviously a submonoid of F (G0 ). We
denote by A(G0 ) the set of atoms in the monoid B(G0 ). The length of an atom
is clearly bounded by |G|. The large Davenport constant of G0 is
D(G0 ) = max{|S| : S ∈ A(G0 )} ∈ N.
Moreover, we denote by M(G0 ) the set of product-one free sequences over G0
and we define the small Davenport constant of G0 as
d(G0 ) = max{|S| : S ∈ M(G0 )}.
We have the inequality
d(G0 ) + 1 ≤ D(G0 )
with equality when the elements in G0 commute with each other.
16
5.2
Some known results
For a non-cyclic group G with a cyclic subgroup of index two Olson and White
[28] proved that d(G) = 12 |G|. Morover, recently it was proven by Geroldinger
and Grynkiewicz [18] that for these groups D(G) = d(G) + |G′ |.
For the non-abelian semidirect product Cp ⋊ Cq where p, q are odd primes
it was shown by Grynkiewicz [20, Corollary 5.7 and Theorem 5.1] that we have
d(Cp ⋊ Cq ) = p + q − 2 and D(Cp ⋊ Cq ) = 2p.
5.3
The large Davenport constant for H27
Consider H27 , the Heisenberg group with 27 elements having the presentation
ha, b, c | a3 = b3 = c3 = 1, c = [a, b] = a−1 b−1 abi. This is an extraspecial
group, its commutator subgroup hci coincides with the center Z := Z(H27 ). As
a result, the commutator identities (which hold for any group) take the following
simpler form in this particular case:
[x, yz] = [x, y][x, z] [xy, z] = [x, z][y, z]
(9)
for any x, y, z ∈ H27 . As [c, x] = 1 for any x ∈ H27 we see that the value of
[x, y] depends only on the cosets xZ and yZ so that the commutator defines
in fact a bilinear map on H27 /Z ∼
= C3 × C3 with values in C3 . Moreover as c
commutes with every other element of the group it is immediate that every Zcoset has a representative of the form ai bj for some i, j ∈ Z/3Z and by repeated
applications of (9) we get
[ai bj , ak bl ] = cil−jk = c
det i j
k l .
(10)
By (10) the elements x = ai bj and y = ak bl commute if and only if the vectors
(i, j) and (k, l) are linearly dependent over Z/3Z. For the rest we denote by
x̄ the image of any x ∈ H27 at the natural surjection H27 → C3 × C3 and we
extend this notation to sequences in the obvious way, as well.
We say that two sequences S and T over a group G are similar if α(S) = T
for an automorphism α ∈ Aut(G) (the action of Aut(G) on G extends naturally
to an action on F (G)). A sequence S over G is called degenerate if supp(S) is
contained in a proper subgroup of G.
Lemma 5.1. Let T = R · S be a product-one sequence such that |π(R)| = 3 and
S is not product-one free. Then T is not an atom.
Proof. By the assumption on S there is a non-empty product-one sequence
U | S. Consider the sequence V = T ·U [−1] . Then V̄ is a zero-sum sequence over
C3 × C3 , whence π(V ) ⊆ Z. But for R | V we have |π(R)| = 3 hence π(V ) = Z
so that V is also a product-one sequence. Thus the equality T = U · V shows
that T is not an atom.
Lemma 5.2. Let T be a non-degenerate sequence over H27 \ Z of length at least
3. Then either |π(T )| = 3 or T̄ = ē · f¯ · (−ē−f¯) for a basis {ē, f¯} of H27 /Z
Proof. Assume that π(T ) is not a full Z-coset. As T is non-degenerate there
must be two elements e, f in T such that [e, f ] = c. Hence |π(T )| = 2. Let
g be an arbitrary element in T · (e · f )[−1] . Then ḡ 6= ē because otherwise
17
π(g ·e·f ) ⊇ {gef, gf e, f ge} = gef Z. Also ḡ 6= −ē because otherwise π(g ·e·f ) ⊇
{gef, gf e, ef g} = gef Z. Similarly ḡ is different from f¯, −f¯.
As a result in the Z/3Z-vector space H27 /Z ∼
= C3 × C3 we have a relation
αē + β f¯ + γḡ = 0 where the coefficients α, β are non-zero. Moreover γ 6= 0 also
holds by the linear independence of ē and f¯. Up to similarity and the choice of
the basis e, f only two cases are possible: (i) ē+f¯ = ḡ, but then [e, f ] = [e, g] = c,
hence π(e · f · g) = ef gZ, again a contradiction, or (ii) ē + f¯ + ḡ = 0; then
[e, f ] = [g, e] = [f, g] = c hence ef g = cf eg = f ge = cgf e = gef = cegf , so
that |π(e · f · g)| = 2.
In the proof below we shall use the following ad hoc terminology: A subset
of C3 × C3 of the form {e, f, −e − f } where e, f form a basis of C3 × C3 will be
called an affine line, while a subset of the form {e, f, e + f } where e, f form a
basis of C3 × C3 will be called an affine cap (the terminology is motivated by the
literature on the so-called cap set problem). Note that a three-element subset of
C3 × C3 in which any two elements are linearly independent over Z/3Z is either
an affine line or an affine cap.
Proposition 5.3. D(H27 ) ≤ 8.
Proof. Assume indirectly that there is an atomic product-one sequence T of
length at least 9. After ordering the elements of T = g1 · g2 · · · gn in such a way
that g1 g2 · · · gn = 1 and replacing T with T ′ = g1 · · · g8 · (g9 g10 · · · gn ) we may
assume that |T | = 9.
A. If T is degenerate then it is in fact an irreducible zero-sum sequence over
C3 × C3 , hence |T | ≤ D(C3 × C3 ) = 5, a contradiction. So for the rest we assume
that T is non-degenerate so that T̄ contains a basis {e, f } of H27 /Z.
B. T̄ contains an element g 6∈ hei ∪ hf i (i.e. T̄ has an affine line or an affine
cap as a subsequence). Otherwise, if T̄ is contained in the set hei ∪ hf i then
T = C · A1 · . . . · At where C̄ = 0[k] and Āi ∈ {e[3] , f [3] , −e · e, −f · f }. Choose
ai ∈ π(Ai ) for i = 1, . . . , t. Then the sequence Q := C · a1 · . . . · at is a zero-sum
sequence over Z ∼
= C3 , hence if k + t > 3 then Q factors into the product of
two non-empty zero-sum sequences and T factors accordingly, a contradiction.
If k > 0 then we get k + t ≥ k + (9 − k)/3 > 3, as |Ai | ≤ 3 for all i, again a
contradiction. Hence k = 0, t = 3 and T̄ is similar to e[6] · f [3] . Then T contains
a degenerate subsequence of length 6 > D(C3 × C3 ), which in turn must contain
a proper zero-sum subsequence R such that R̄ = e[3] . Then the complement
S = T · R[−1] has |S| = 6, hence π(S) = Z by Lemma 5.2, a contradiction by
Lemma 5.1.
C. T̄ cannot contain a subsequence R̄ | T̄ similar to one of the following
sequences:
e · f · (−e) · (−f )
(11)
e · f · (e + f )[2]
(12)
Indeed, these sequences R̄ are such that for their preimages R we have that
π(R) = Z by Lemma 5.2. So for any such R | T the complement S = T ·
R[−1] must be product-one free, as otherwise we would get a contradiction by
Lemma 5.1. Hence S cannot be degenerate, as |S| = 5 = D(C3 × C3 ) and
π(S) ⊆ Z \ {1}. Therefore by Lemma 5.2 it is necessary that S = x · y · L where
18
x̄ = ȳ = 0 and L̄ is an affine line. Moreover by our assumption we must have
π(L) = Z \{1} and x, y ∈ Z \{1}, as well. But then 1 ∈ π(x·L), a contradiction.
D. We claim that T̄ must contain an affine line and 0 6∈ supp(T̄ ). For assume
that T̄ does not contain an affine line. Then T̄ still contains an affine cap by B,
so we may assume that e ·f · (e + f ) | T . Then to avoid affine lines it is necessary
that e − f, f − e, −e − f do not occur in T̄ . To avoid subsequences of type (11)
we have either vT̄ (−e) = 0 or vT̄ (−f ) = 0. Assume now that vT̄ (−e) > 0 and
vT̄ (−f ) = 0 (the case vT̄ (−e) = 0 and vT̄ (−f ) > 0 is analogous). Then to avoid
subsequences of type (12) we must have vT̄ (f ) = vT̄ (e + f ) = 1. As a result the
image of T̄ modulo hei is f [2] · 0[7] , but this is not a product-one sequence in
C3 × C3 /hei ∼
= C3 , a contradiction.
So it remains that T̄ = 0[k] · e[i] · f [j] · (e + f ). Since T̄ is a zero-sum sequence
over C3 × C3 we must have i ≡ j ≡ 2 (mod 3). As |T̄ | = 9 either k + i = 6 or
k + j = 6 and we get again a degenerate subsequence which must contain a zerosum subsequence R such that its complement S = T · R[−1] has π(S) = Z by
Lemma 5.2, again a contradiction. Thus T̄ contains an affine line. An argument
similar to the one in C shows also that 0 does not occur in T̄ .
From now on we assume that T̄ contains the affine line L̄ = {e, f, g} as a
subsequence.
P
E. Next we claim that x∈−L̄ vT̄ (x) ≤ 1. Indeed, T̄ cannot contain two
different elements x, y belonging to −L̄ because that would yield a subsequence
of type (11). Moreover, vT̄ (x) ≥ 2 for some x in −L would yield the type (12)
subsequence x · x · L · (−x)[−1] of T̄ .
F. We claim that vT̄ (e − f ) = 0 and vT̄ (f − e) = 0. For assume to the
contrary that vT̄ (e − f ) > 0 (the case vT̄ (f − e) > 0 being analogous). Observe
that for any x in L we must have vT̄ (x) = 1 to avoid subsequences of type (12).
In view of E it follows that vT̄ (e − f ) + vT̄ (f − e) ≥ |T | − 4 = 5 = D(C3 × C3 ), so
that T has again a degenerate subsequence containing a zero-sum subsequence
R (with supp(R̄) ⊆ {0, e − f, f − e}) such that its complement S = T · R[−1]
has π(S) = Z by Lemma 5.2, leading to a contradiction by Lemma 5.1.
G. Now we prove that supp(T̄ ) = L. For otherwise it would follow from
D, E, F that T̄ = (−x) · x · T̄0 where vL (x) > 0 and supp(T̄0 ) ⊆ L. But T̄0
must also be a zero-sum sequence, hence |T̄0 | is divisible by 3 because the only
irreducible zero-sum sequences over C3 × C3 with support contained in L are
e[3] , f [3] , (−e−f)[3] , e · f · (−e−f ). But then |T | ≡ 2 mod 3, contradicting the
assumption that |T | = 9.
H. So we have a factorization T = L · R such that L̄ = e · f · g with
e + f + g = 0 ∈ C3 × C3 and supp(R̄) ⊆ {e, f, g}. For any such factorization
L̄ and R̄ are zero-sum sequences, hence π(R) ⊆ Z, moreover |π(R)| = 3 by
Lemma 5.2, so that 1 ∈ π(R) and consequently 1 6∈ π(L). Observe now that an
element in supp(T̄ ), say e must have vT̄ (e) ≥ 3. Let Q = x1 · x2 · x3 | T be such
that Q̄ = e[3] and x1 ∈ L. If xi 6= x1 for some i > 1 then consider the sequence
[−1]
L′ := L · x1 · xi . By assumption π(L) = Z \ {1} and x−1
1 xi ∈ Z \ {1} hence
′
′
′
π(L′ ) = π(L)x−1
1 xi ∋ 1. Thus L̄ = L̄ and T = L · R would be a factorization of
T as a product of two product-one sequences. We conclude that x1 = x2 = x3 ,
so that Q is a product-one subsequence and T = Q · S where S̄ is a product-one
sequence over C3 × C3 and hence S is a product-one sequence by Lemma 5.2.
This contradicts the assumption that T is an atom.
Remark 5.4. The idea of Lemma 5.1 appears in the proof of a result of
19
Grynkiewicz [20, Corollary 3.4] which yields for the Heisenberg group of order p3 the inequality
D(G) ≤ d(G) + |G′ | = d(G) + p.
(13)
We established by our algorithm that d(H27 ) = 6 so in this case (13) gives
D(G) ≤ 9 which in view of Proposition 5.3 is not sharp. On the other hand we
show below that Proposition 5.3 is sharp.
Proposition 5.5. D(H27 ) ≥ 8.
Proof. Assume c ∈ π(a[i] · b[j] ) for some i, j ∈ N. Then i, j > 0 since c 6∈ hai and
c 6∈ hbi. Moreover c̄ = 0 = āi b̄j holds, as well. But since ā and b̄ are independent
in C3 × C3 it is necessary that i ≡ j ≡ 0 mod 3. It follows that i + j ≥ 6. On
the other hand c = [a, b] = aabbab hence the minimal expression of c in terms
of a and b has length 6. By a similar argument the same is true for c−1 , as well.
Now ccbbaaba = 1 and we claim that the product-one sequence S = a[3] ·
[3]
b · c[2] is an atom. Otherwise let S = T · R for some non-empty product-one
sequences T, R and we may assume that vT (c) > 0. If vR (c) > 0 holds, too,
then T · c[−1] contains only a, b and c−1 ∈ π(T · c[−1] ). Hence, by what has been
said before, T · c[−1] = a[3] · b[3] . But then R = c, which is not a product-one
sequence. From this contradiction it follows that vR (c) = 0 hence c[2] | T . But
then supp(T · c[−2] ) ⊆ {a, b} and c ∈ π(T · c[−2] ), hence again T · c[−2] = a[3] · b[3] ,
so that R is empty, which is a contradiction.
5.4
Diameter of the Cayley digraph
Next we state a general inequality that can be obtained by a similar argument as the proof of Proposition 5.5. This result is not used here, but seems
worthwhile to mention, as it involves the diameter of Cayley digraphs, which
(in contrast with the large Davenport constant for a non-abelian group) has a
rather extensive literature:
Proposition 5.6. Let X be a set of generators of a finite group G and Cay(G, X)
the corresponding Cayley digraph. Then D(G) ≥ diam(Cay(G, X)) + 1.
Proof. Let 1 = g0 , g1 , . . . , gd ∈ G be a sequence of vertices on a non-self-crossing
path of maximal length in Cay(G, X), so that d = diam(Cay(G, X)). Now set
−1
si = gi−1
gi for all i = 1, . . . , d and consider the sequence S = s1 · . . . · sd · gd−1 .
By construction S is a product-one sequence and we claim that it is an atom in
B(X ∪ {gd−1 }). For otherwise S = A · B for some product-one sequences A, B
where gd−1 ∈ A, and then we can order the elements of A in such a way that
we obtain an equality si1 · · · sir gd−1 = 1 where r < d. But since si ∈ X for
all i, this means that we have in Cay(G, X) a path of length r from 1 to gd , a
contradiction.
Problem 5.7. Is there any relation between maxX⊆G {diam(Cay(G, X))} and
d(G)? More concretely, based on a little computer experimentation we raise
the following question: does the inequality d(G) ≥ diam(Cay(G, X)) hold in
general?
20
6
Computing the Davenport constants
We take over the following notations from Section 5.1: let F = F (G) be the
monoid of all sequences of elements in G, let M ⊆ F be the set of product-one
free sequences and A ⊆ F the set of atoms, i.e. all product-one sequences which
cannot be written as the product of two non-empty product-one subsequences.
For any k ≥ 1 let Fk ⊆ F denote the set of all sequences of length k and set
Mk = M ∩ Fk , Ak = A ∩ Fk . Moreover, M0 = {1F } consists of the empty
sequence.
We propose two algorithms: one for enumerating all product-one free sequences and another one for computing all the atoms and thereby establishing
the values of d(G) and D(G), respectively. We have implemented these algorithms in the GAP computer algebra system (see [16]) and used them to compute
and/or verify the small and large Davenport constants given in Section 2.
The algorithms construct the set M (respectively A) successively, as a union
of the sets Mk (respectively Ak ). During the construction of the sets Mk or Ak
we are not testing all elements of Fk for being product-one free or atomic (as
this task would be practically unfeasible), but we limit the scope of our search
to a much smaller subset defined in what follows.
A sequence T is called a splitting of a sequence S if T = S · g [−1] · x · y for
some g ∈ supp(S) and x, y ∈ G such that xy = g. We denote by S ≺ T the
fact that T is a splitting of S. For any subset S ⊂ F (G) we set γ(S) := {T ∈
F (G) : S ≺ T for some S ∈ S}.
Lemma 6.1. For any k ≥ 1 we have Mk+1 ⊆ γ(Mk ) and Ak+1 ⊆ γ(Ak ).
Proof. If T = g · h · T ′ is a product-one free (respectively atomic) sequence of
length k + 1 ≥ 2, then obviously the sequence S = (gh) · T ′ has length k and is
product-one free (respectively atomic) too. Moreover, S ≺ T .
Remark 6.2. Observe that by this lemma if Mk = ∅ for some k ≥ 1 then
Ml = ∅ for every l > k. So the smallest k such that Mk = ∅ equals d(G) + 1.
Similarly the smallest k such that Ak = ∅ is equal to D(G) + 1.
Another idea used for reducing the complexity of our algorithms was to
enumerate the elements of Mk and Ak only “up to similarity”. Recall from
Section 5.3 that two sequences S and T are said to be similar if there is an
automorphism α ∈ Aut(G) such that S = α(T ).
Lemma 6.3. Let Rk be a set of Aut(G)-orbit representatives over Mk (respectively Ak ). Then there is a system of Aut(G)-orbit representatives Rk+1 over
Mk+1 (respectively Ak+1 ) such that Rk+1 ⊆ γ(Rk ).
Proof. Observe that the relation ≺ is compatible with the Aut(G)-action in the
sense that S ≺ T holds if and only if α(S) ≺ α(T ) for some α ∈ Aut(G) if and
only if α(S) ≺ α(T ) for each α ∈ Aut(G).
Now we prove that for any sequence T ∈ Mk+1 its Aut(G)-orbit Orb(T )
has a non-empty intersection with γ(Rk ). Take an arbitrary sequence S ≺ T so
that S ∈ Mk . As Rk ⊆ Mk is a complete set of representatives, there is some
R ∈ Rk such that R = α(S) for some α ∈ Aut(G). Hence by the compatibility
of ≺ it follows that R = α(S) ≺ α(T ). As a result α(T ) ∈ Orb(T ) ∩ γ(Rk ) and
we are done. The proof is similar for the case of Ak .
21
6.1
Algorithm for computing the small Davenport constant
Let us record the following obvious statement:
Lemma 6.4. A sequence R of length k ≥ 1 is product-one free if and only if
1∈
/ π(R) and for all g ∈ supp(R) we have that R · g [−1] ∈ Mk−1 .
Given an arbitrary finite group G, Algorithm 1 computes the small Davenport constant.
The set of all product-one free sequences of G may be obtained
S
as M = k Mk after the repeat-until loop has terminated (right after line 33).
In lines 3–5 of the algorithm we have identified the sequences of length
one with the respective group elements. Hence the set M1 of product-one free
sequences having length one consists of all the group elements except the identity
(line 3), from which we choose a set R1 of Aut(G)-orbit representatives (line
4). For every length-one sequence we store the set of products (line 5). These
initial data having been established, the algorithm proceeds with computing the
sets Mk and Rk for all increasing k > 1, until it finds the first value k for which
Mk = ∅. The finiteness of the algorithm is guaranteed by Lemma 6.1 (together
with Remark 6.2).
Observe that inside the for-loops in line 14 the variable R will take successively all the values from the set γ(Rk−1 ), therefore it is guaranteed that for
k > 1 all the possible candidate sequences will be tested for being product-one
free and the set Rk (from Lemma 6.3) is built correctly.
Before testing the sequence R for being product-one free (using Lemma 6.4),
in line 15 it is checked first whether the sequence R is among the already computed product-one free sequences of length k (via the condition R ∈
/ Mk ).
Elimination of duplicates is essential for correctly building the set Rk of representatives (so that in line 18 we compute only the set Rk ⊆ γ(Rk−1 ) and not
one of its supersets). If R is a new sequence (in the sense that it is not similar
to any of the already found product-one free sequences), it gets tested using the
conditions from Lemma 6.4 (the second condition from line 15 and the condition
from line 17). π(R) is computed (in line 16) using the following observation: for
any sequence R and fixed x ∈ R, we can write
[
π(R) =
π(R1 ) x π(R2 ).
R1 ·R2 =R·x[−1]
If R is found to be product-one free, it is also added as a new representative of
the Aut(G)-orbits (line 18). The orbit itself is computed successively (and stored
in the variable OR ) by evaluating all the automorphisms α on the sequence R.
In line 27 the set OR will be the same as the set Orb(R) of Aut(G) orbits of R.
For every new sequence R′ (new in the sense of not being in the already
computed part of the orbit), we also have to compute and store the set π(R′ )
by acting with the proper automorphism α on the set π(R) (line 24). Hence
the algorithm stores the product sets for all the enumerated product-one free
sequences. This is essential for a relatively fast computation performed in line
16.
The set Mk gets computed in line 27 as a union of Aut(G) orbits of the
representatives. In the last step, the value k − 1 is returned: this is the small
Davenport constant of G, as explained in Remark 6.2.
22
Algorithm 1: SmallDavenport(G)
input : G
output: d(G)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
M0 ← {1FG };
π(1FG ) ← {1G };
M1 ← G \ {1G };
R1 ← {gα : α ∈ M1 / Aut(G)};
forall g ∈ M1 do π(g) ← {g};
k ← 1;
repeat
k ← k + 1;
Mk ← ∅;
Rk ← ∅;
forall S ∈ Rk−1 do
forall g ∈ supp(S) do
forall x ∈ G \ {1G , g} do
R ← S · g [−1] · x · (x−1 g);
[−1]
if R ∈
/ Mk and
∈ Mk−1 then
S ∀g ∈ supp(R) : R · g
π(R) ← R1 ·R2 =R·x[−1] (π(R1 ) x π(R2 ));
if 1G ∈
/ π(R) then
Rk ← Rk ∪ {R};
OR ← {R};
forall α ∈ Aut(G) do
R′ ← α(R);
if R′ ∈
/ OR then
OR ← OR ∪ {R′ };
π(R′ ) ← α (π(R));
end
end
Mk ← Mk ∪ OR ;
end
end
end
end
end
until Mk = ∅;
return k − 1;
23
6.2
Algorithm for computing the large Davenport constant
Given an arbitrary finite group G, Algorithm 2 computes the large
Davenport
S
constant. The set of all atoms of G may be obtained as A = k Ak after the
repeat-until loop has terminated (right after line 19).
The algorithm begins with loading the sets A1 and R1 with the sequence
consisting only of the identity element of the group. In line 11 the variable
S ′ will take successively all the values from the set γ(Rk−1 ), therefore it is
guaranteed that for k > 1 all the possible candidate sequences will be tested for
being atoms and the set Ak (from Lemma 6.3) is built correctly. In line 10 the
variable h is prevented from taking the values 1G or g, since this would bring
in the identity element in the support of S ′ .
The algorithm first checks whether a candidate sequence S ′ is among the
already computed atoms of length k via the condition S ′ ∈
/ Ak from line 12,
ensuring that S ′ is a new atom (in the sense that it is not similar to any of the
already found atoms of length k). Checking whether a sequence S ′ is an atom
is performed by the second condition in line 12: by definition the product-one
sequence S ′ is an atom if it cannot be written as a product of shorter atoms.
The predicate D(S ′ , k) in line 12 is true if and only if the product-one sequence
S ′ of length k is not an atom and may be given in the following way:
′
D(S , k) ⇐⇒ ∃A ∈
′
k
⌊[
2⌋
i=2
[−1]
S ·A
Ai with A | S ′ such that
∈ Ak−|A| or D(S ′ · A[−1] , k − |A|).
It may be implemented using a recursive function, bailing out with a positive
answer as soon as it finds a decomposition of S ′ into atoms.
In line 13 the newly found atom S ′ gets added to the set Rk of representatives
and the set Ak of atoms is completed with the Aut(G) orbit of S ′ , denoted by
Orb(S ′ ) (in line 14). In the last step, the value k − 1 is returned as the large
Davenport constant of G, as explained in Remark 6.2.
Although the check is performed only for a system of representatives of
the Aut(G) orbits of atoms (for all S ′ ∈ Rk−1 ), the “decomposability test”
described by the predicate D(S ′ , k) uses the whole set of already computed
Sk−1
atoms i=2 Ai , which is the main performance bottleneck of the algorithm.
24
Algorithm 2: LargeDavenport(G)
input : G
output: D(G)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
A1 ← {1G };
R1 ← {1G };
k ← 1;
repeat
k ← k + 1;
Ak ← ∅;
Rk ← ∅;
forall S ∈ Rk−1 do
forall g ∈ supp(S) do
forall x ∈ G \ {1G , g} do
S ′ ← S · g [−1] · x · (x−1 g);
if S ′ ∈
/ Ak and not D(S ′ , k) then
Rk ← Rk ∪ {S ′ };
Ak ← Ak ∪ Orb(S ′ );
end
end
end
end
until Ak = ∅;
return k − 1;
Remark 6.5. We have used a GAP implementation of Algorithm 1 and 2 to
compute the small and large Davenport constants from the table in Section 2
in case of those groups for which a formula for these constants in not readily
available (see Subsection 5.2).
Although parallelization is easily achievable in case of both algorithms, a
“single-threaded” implementation was found to fit our present requirements,
using a personal computer clocked at 2 GHz.
The small Davenport constants from Section 2 have been obtained in under a
minute worth of computation, with the single exception of the group M27 = C9 ⋊
C3 , for which d(M27 ) = 10 has been obtained in about 7 minutes. This group
was found to have a number of 102212 product-one free sequences, grouped in
1987 equivalence classes. In contrast, the second most “difficult” group (among
the non-abelian groups of order less than 32 that contain no cyclic subgroup of
index two) was H27 = U T3 (F3 ) for which our implementation of Algorithm 1
yielded the following data in about 40 seconds: d(H27 ) = 6 with 69026 productone free sequences partitioned by the similarity relation into 187 equivalence
classes. In case of the other groups the running times range from below one
second up to half a minute.
Computation of the large Davenport constant using Algorithm 2 is more
demanding. The most time-consuming group from the list was SL2 (F3 ) = Ã4 ,
with the large Davenport constant being 13, housing 499695 atoms partitioned
in 21033 equivalence classes. In the case of this group the computation took
about 40 minutes. Excepting C3 ⋊Dih8 = (C6 ×C2 )⋊γ C2 and S4 (computation
25
taking about 24 minutes for each of them), the running times hardly reached one
minute. For example in the interesting case of H27 , the large Davenport constant
D(H27 ) = 8 was computed in 19 seconds. This group has 108827 atoms grouped
in only 340 equivalence classes (this explaining the relative quick computation
within this group).
References
[1] G. Bhowmik and J.-C. Schlage-Puchta, Davenport’s constant for groups of
the form Z3 ⊕Z3 ⊕Z3d , Additive combinatorics, 307–326, CRM Proc. Lecture
Notes, 43, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2007.
[2] F. Chen and S. Savchev, Long minimal zero-sum sequences in the groups
C2r−1 ⊕ C2k , Integers 14 (2014), Paper No. A 23, 29 pp.
[3] C. Chevalley, Invariants of finite groups generated by reflections, Amer. J.
Math. 77 (1955), 778-782.
[4] K. Cziszter, The Noether number of the non-abelian group of order 3p,
Periodica Math. Hungarica 68 (2014), 150-159.
[5] K. Cziszter, On the Noether number of p-groups, arXiv:1604.01938
[6] K. Cziszter and M. Domokos, On the generalized Davenport constant and
the Noether number, Central European Journal of Mathematics 11 (2013),
1605-1615.
[7] K. Cziszter and M. Domokos, Groups with large Noether bound, Ann. Inst.
Fourier (Grenoble) 64, no. 3 (2014), 909-944.
[8] K. Cziszter and M. Domokos, The Noether number for the groups with a
cyclic subgroup of index two, Journal of Algebra 399 (2014), 546-560.
[9] K. Cziszter and M. Domokos, Lower bounds on the Noether number, Transform. Groups, 2018, DOI 10.1007/s00031-018-9479-4.
[10] K. Cziszter, M. Domokos, and A. Geroldinger, The interplay of invariant theory with multiplicative ideal theory and with arithmetic combinatorics, in: Scott T. Chapman, M. Fontana, A. Geroldinger, B.Olberding
(Eds.), Multiplicative Ideal Theory and Factorization Theory, SpringerVerlag, 2016, pp. 43-95.
[11] Ch. Delorme, O. Ordaz, and D. Quiroz, Some remarks on Davenport constant, Discrete Mathematics 237 (2001),119-128.
[12] J. Draisma, G. Kemper, and D.Wehlau, Polarization of separating invariants, Canad. J. Math. Soc. 60 (2008), 556-571.
[13] P. van Emde Boas and D. Kruyswijk. A combinatorial problem on finite abelian groups. III. Math. Centrum Amsterdam Afd. Zuivere Wisk.,
1969(ZW-008):32 pp., 1969.
[14] P. Fleischmann, The Noether bound in invariant theory of finite groups,
Adv. Math. 156 (2000), 23-32.
26
[15] J. Fogarty, On Noether’s bound for polynomial invariants of a finite group,
Electron. Res. Announc. Amer. Math. Soc. 7 (2001), 5-7.
[16] The GAP Group, GAP – Groups, Algorithms, and Programming, Version
4.8.6 ; 2016, (http://www.gap-system.org).
[17] A. Geroldinger, Additive group theory and non-unique factorizations, Combinatorial number theory and additive group theory, 1-86, Adv. Courses
Math. CRM Barcelona, Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 2009.
[18] A. Geroldinger and D. J. Grynkiewicz, The large Davenport constant I:
Groups with a cyclic index 2 subgroup, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 217 (2013),
863-885.
[19] A. Geroldinger and F. Halter-Koch, Non-Unique Factorizations. Algebraic,
Combinatorial and Analytic Theory, Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol.
278, Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2006.
[20] D. J. Grynkiewicz, The large Davenport constant II: General upper bounds,
J. Pure Appl. Algebra 217 (2013), 222-2246.
[21] D. J. Grynkiewicz, Structural Additive Theory, Developments in Mathematics, Springer, 2013.
[22] F. Halter-Koch, A generalization of Davenport’s constant and its arithmetical applications, Colloquium Mathematicum LXIII (1992), 203–210.
[23] M. Hunziker, Classical invariant theory for finite reflection groups, Transformation groups 2 (1997), 145-161.
[24] J.F. Humphreys, A course in group theory, Oxford University Press, 1996.
[25] F. Knop, On Noether’s and Weyl’s bound in positive characteristic, in
”Invariant Theory in All Characteristics”, (Ed.: H. E. A. Eddy Campbell
and D. L. Wehlau), CRM Proceedings and Lecture Notes 35, Amer. Math.
Soc., Providence, Rhode Island, pp. 175-188, 2004.
[26] E. Noether, Der Endlichkeitssatz der Invarianten endlicher Gruppen, Math.
Ann. 77 (1916), 89-92.
[27] E. Noether, Der Endlichkeitssatz der Invarianten endlicher linearer Gruppen der Charakteristik p, Nachr. Ges. Wiss. Göttingen (1926), 28-35.
[28] J. E. Olson and E. T. White, Sums from a sequence of group elements, in:
H. Zassenhaus (Ed.), Number Theory and Algebra, Academic Press, 1977,
pp. 215-222.
[29] D. R. Richman, Invariants of finite groups over fields of characteristic p,
Adv. Math. 124 (1996), 25-48.
[30] B. J. Schmid, Finite groups and invariant theory, in “Topics in invariant theory” (M.-P. Malliavin, ed.), Lecture notes in mathematics, no. 1478,
Springer, 1989-90, pp. 35-66.
27
[31] W. A. Schmid, The inverse problem associated to the Davenport constant
for C2 ⊕ C2 ⊕ C2n , and applications to the arithmetical characterization of
class groups, Electron. J. Combin. 18 (2011), no. 1, Paper 33, 42 pp.
[32] M. Sezer, Sharpening the generalized Noether bound in the invariant theory
of finite groups, J. Algebra 254 (2002), 252-263.
[33] G. C. Shephard and J. A. Todd, Finite unitary reflection groups, Canad.
J. Math. 6 (1954), 274-304.
[34] D. L. Wehlau, Some problems in invariant theory, in ”Invariant Theory in
All Characteristics”, (Ed.: H. E. A. Eddy Campbell and D. L. Wehlau),
CRM Proceedings and Lecture Notes 35, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence,
Rhode Island, pp. 265-274, 2004.
[35] H. Weyl, The classical groups, Second edition, Princeton University Press,
Princeton, 1946.
28
| 4math.GR
|
A network model with structured nodes
arXiv:1011.2336v1 [cs.SI] 10 Nov 2010
Pierluigi Frisco
School of Math. and Comp. Sciences, Heriot-Watt University,
EH14 4AS Edinburgh, UK,
[email protected]
Abstract
We present a network model in which words over a specific alphabet,
called structures, are associated to each node and undirected edges are
added depending on some distance between different structures.
It is shown that this model can generate, without the use of preferential attachment or any other heuristic, networks with topological features
similar to biological networks: power law degree distribution, clustering
coefficient independent from the network size, etc.
Specific biological networks (C. Elegans neural network and E. Coli
protein-protein interaction network) are replicated using this model.
1
Introduction
In the last years mathematical and computer science (CS) concepts and methodologies and have been successfully used in Biology. This fascinating and fruitful
combination of these disciplines has clear advantages for both of them. When
biological phenomena are regarded as information processes, then they can be
studied using mathematical and CS tools and concepts. This gives to Biology
new ways to approach problems, solutions to them and this deepens the understanding of biological processes. At the same time CS enriches itself with new
ways to define and study information process while Mathematics enriches itself
with new concepts and theories.
In the last decade several studies ([2, 13, 9, 12]) showed the importance of the
topology of biological networks. These results proved that biological networks
are composed of motifs, that biological networks with specific functions have an
abundance of certain motifs instead of others, that the number of edges for the
node in the network follows specific laws, etc.
More than studying the features of empirical networks, it is also important
to have algorithms able to generate networks with the same features of empirical
ones. This kind of algorithms, called models, are an invaluable help in the generation of artificial networks and they provide insights on how certain features
of complex empirical networks arise from the construction rules present in the
model.
Examples of such procedures are: the Erdös-Rényi model [5], the WattsStrogatz model [17] and the Barábasi-Albert model [3] and its variants [1, 14].
The E-R model allows to generate random networks able to reproduce the smallworld property (short path from any node to any other node in the network)
but they fail to account for the local clustering characterising many empirical
networks. Both these properties are captures by the W-S model, but unfortunately it does not capture the inhomogeneous degree distribution found in
1
many empirical networks. The B-A model can overcome these limitations and
gives rise to the degree distribution. This degree distribution is obtained using
preferential attachment: the probability for a node to receive an edge depends
on the number of edges the node already has. The original B-A model does not
capture the independence of the clustering coefficient from the size (number of
nodes) of a network. This feature is captured by a variant [14] of this model in
which heuristics (replication of networks) are used.
The present study originates from the wish to create a network model able
to reproduce biological networks without the use of heuristics. Despite the
very many successful applications of the B-A model, it was not clear to us how
preferential attachment could have been present in the evolution of, say, gene
networks. Why a gene with many interactions is more likely to get even more
interactions than a gene with few interactions? How can a new added gene
“know” what are the genes with more interactions? In this respect, we believe
that preferential attachment capture the overall effect of something more basic
present in the evolution of biological networks.
The network model introduced and studied in the present paper tries to capture some basic features present in the evolution of biological networks: network
growth, node structure and distance between node structures.
The node structure represents, for instance, the DNA sequence in genes,
proteins’ secondary structure, the personality features in humans, etc. The distance between nodes represents, for instance, the fact that proteins will interact
if their tertiary structure (which depends on their secondary structure) allows it,
or that two humans will be friends if the treats of their personality are somehow
close.
In the following we present the model with structured nodes (Section 2), we
analyse it (Section 3) and we use it to generate specific biological networks (Section 4). The paper ends with a discussion section (Section 5). Supplementary
material (further technical details, generated networks, program implementing
the proposed network model, etc.) is present at [11].
2
Description of the model
The network model with structured node (SN model) is such that each node in
the network has a structure: a word over a specified alphabet. Given initial
nodes have different structure. Nodes are added to the network one by one.
Each new node has a structure given by the modification of a randomly chosen
structure already present in the network. If the structure of the new node is
already present in the network, then the new node is not added (that is, in
the network all nodes have different structure). If the structure of the new
node is not present in the network and the new node has no edge with the
existing nodes, then the new node is not added (that is, isolated nodes are not
allowed). Undirected edges are added to the network depending on a given
distance between node structures. This process is repeated until the network
2
reaches a given number of nodes. A simple example follows.
Let us assume that the alphabet is {A, B, C} and that the network contains
only one initial node with structure ABCABC. Edges between nodes are added
only if the Hamming distance [18] between the structures of the nodes is at
most 1.
A node can be added to the network by mutating one symbol in the structure
of an existing node. For instance, the node ABBABC can be obtained mutating
the third symbol of ABCABC. An edge is added between the two nodes (they only
differ in one symbol).
A third node can be added to the network by adding one symbol to the
structure of a randomly selected existing node. For instance, the node ABBABBC
can be obtained adding a B between B and C in node ABBABC. An edge is added
between the new node and ABBABC (when computing the distance between two
structures exceeding symbols in the longer structure are disregarded). No edge
is added between the new node and ABCABC because there are 2 differences in
their first 6 characters.
The structure ABCBC can be obtained from ABCABC deleting the second B. The
node with this new structure does not become part of the network as no edge
has been added (the distance between ABCBC and the other structures present
in the network is bigger than 1).
The structure ABBBBABBC can be obtained from ABBABBC duplicating the
second and third B. The node with this new structure does not become part of
the network as no edge has been added.
Input parameters define the probabilities to mutate, add, delete and duplicate node structures and their values has to sum up to 1.
We also used a Hamming distance in which the comparison between symbols
considers groups of consecutive symbols. The order of the symbols present in
each such group is irrelevant to the distance. For instance, let us consider the
two structures ABBABC and BABCAB. If the unit distance is 1 (i.e., symbols are
compared one by one), then the distance between the two structures is 5 as
the only matching symbol is the B in the third position. If the unit distance
is 2 (i.e., pairs of symbols are compared), then the distance between the two
structures is 2. This is because the first two pairs are considered equal (AB and
BA differ only in the order of the symbols), and the other two pairs are different
in the symbols they contain. If the unit distance is 3 (i.e., triplets of symbols are
compared), then the distance between the two structures is 0. This is because
the first triples are considered equal (ABB and BAB differ only in the order of
symbols) as well as the second triple (ABC and CAB differ only in the order of
symbols).
An edge between two nodes is present only if their distance is smaller/equal
than the value of the input parameter maximum distance.
When unit distance is bigger than 1, then it is possible to have a file matches
indicating how the different groups of symbols can be matched to eachother. In
other words, a file matches behaves as the genetic code: it denotes which tuples
of symbols have to be regarded as equal (in the same way different codons
translate in the same amino acid). For instance, let unit distance be 2, the
3
alphabet be {A, B}, and the file matches be:
AB =
BA =
AA = BB
BB = AA
With this file matches, the strings ABBB and ABAA have distance 0. This is
because the first pair (AB) is the same in both strings, while the second pair (BB
and AA) is defined by the file matches to be equal. Without the file matches,
the two string have distance 1 (due to the second pair).
We call instance a set of input parameters. The complete list of input parameters together with their description can be found in the user manual of the
program implementing the SN model [11].
3
Analysis of the model
We assessed our network model over the following network topological features
[10]. Given an undirected network G with N nodes and k edges we denote by
hki the average degree, by L the average path length, by C the average clustering
coefficient, by P (k) the degree distribution and by C(k) the clustering coefficient
distribution.
We also considered the:
3-node motifs distribution, that is the number (normalised to 1) of triples of
nodes having no edge, only 1 edge, only 2 edges and 3 edges between
themselves;
path length distribution, denoted by P L(ℓ), relating the number (normalised
to one) of paths having a certain length ℓ;
heterogeneity index, denoted by ρ(G) (where G is the network), a new formulation of Randić index introduced in [7, 6]. In [7, 6] it is also shown
that the Barabási-Albert model is not able to generate network with a
heterogeneity index as high as the one found in biological networks.
We compared the network generated by an instance our the SN model with
the network generated by the Barabási-Albert model (our implementation of
this model is based on the Fortran implementation present at [16]). For this
purpose we run the Barabási-Albert model starting with a clique of 6 nodes and
adding 6 edges for each new added node. We also run the following instance of
our network model: initial node ABCDEFGHILMN, alphabet A, ..., T, probability to mutate 1 (which implies that the length of the node structures is equal
to the one of the initial node), Hamming distance having unit distance 2 and
maximum distance 2. We run these simulation for 3000 iterations storing the
resulting intermediate networks every 500 iterations. These tests run 100 times
for different random seeds.
4
Figure 1 shows how the average degree, average path length and average
clustering coefficient change in the Barabási-Albert model and in the SN model.
19
5
18
A
17
16
B
4.5
SN
BA
SN
BA
4
<k>15
L
3.5
14
13
3
12
11
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
2.5
500
3000
1000
1500
N
2000
2500
3000
N
100
C
SN
BA
10−1
C
10−2
10−3
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
N
Figure 1: (A) average degree, (B) average path length and (C) average clustering coefficient of a growing Barabási-Albert model network (BA) and a growing
SN model network.
The average path length follows the same curve in both models and the
average degree slowly grows in the SN model while it remain constant in the
Barabási-Albert model. The major difference is present in the clustering coefficient: in remains constant in the SN model while it decreases fast in the
Barabási-Albert model. It is known that empirical networks have a clustering
coefficient independent from their size and in [15] a variant of the BarabásiAlbert model generating networks with a power law degree distribution and a
clustering coefficient independent from the size of the network was presented.
The motif distribution was similar in both model (data not shown).
It is well known that the Barabási-Albert model generates networks with a
degree distribution following a power law P (k) ∼ k −γ . The same holds true for
the considered instance of the SN model (this is not true for all instances of the
SN model).
In both models the exponent of the power law does not change during growth.
Anyhow, in the considered instance, the degree distribution of the networks
generated by the SN model is not following a power law in its initial phases.
This is shown in Fig. 2A where it can be seen that only after k = 5 the degree
distribution follows a power law. This difference with the Barabási-Albert model
is mainly due to the fact that in the Barabási-Albert model each new added node
5
has a fixed number of edges (6 in the case considered by us), while this request
for a minimum number of edges is not present in the SN model.
We run another instance of the SN model for 55000 iterations and then we
let all nodes having less than 5 edges to be removed from the generated networks
together with their edges. The resulting networks, having around 3000 nodes,
have a power law degree distribution Fig. 2B.
100
10−1
A
B
10−1
10−2
P(k)
P(k)
10−2
10−3
10−3
10−4 0
10
101
102
10−4 0
10
103
k
101
k
102
Figure 2: Degree distribution of two instances of the SN model: (A): keeping
all nodes (final trend having slope γ = −1.72), (B) removing nodes with less
than 5 edges together with their edges (trend having slope γ = −2.98).
As already said, in the SN model new nodes are added to the network first
selecting the structure of a node already in the network, then changing it and
finally adding it to the network. In order to study if the selection criteria had
an influence on the generated network we run a variant of the SN model. In this
variant new nodes are added all at once and their structure is a modification of
the structure of the nodes initially present. So, the difference is that only the
initial structures are used as template for the new added structures.
Network generated in this way showed a very low average clustering coefficient (around 0.002) and their degree distribution did not follow a power low
(see supplementary material [11]).
From this we conclude that, in the SN model, the incremental addition of
new nodes to the network (as opposed to the addition of the nodes all at once)
is a necessary element in order to have a power low degree distribution and a
high average clustering coefficient.
4
Reproduced networks
Different instances allow the SN model to generate networks with different topological features. In this section we describe how this model can generate networks having topological features similar to the ones of some empirical networks.
We followed a trial-and-error approach in order to find the input parameters to
‘fit the networks’: manually testing different instances until a ‘sufficiently good’
result was found. We are confident that a different approach, either analytical
6
or based on heuristics (i.e., evolutionary algorithms [4]), could lead to better
results.
All the (input and output) files related to the reproduced network described
in the following are available from [11]. We successfully generated networks
having strong similarities with the MRSA gene network (data not shown).
C. Elegans neural network. In [17] it is reported that the neural network of
C. Elegans has 282 nodes (neurons), an average degree of 14, an average path
length of 2.65 and an average clustering coefficient of 0.28. We were not able to
retrieve a description of this network, so we only tried to match the just given
network topological features.
Using the described network model we run tests having: {A, T} as alphabet,
ATATATATATAT as structure of the only initial node, probability to mutate equal
to 1, unit distance equal to 2 and nodes have a common edge only if their
Hamming distance is smaller than 1. The generated networks with 282 nodes
have (average on 100 tests): 13.94 as average degree, 3.61 as average path length
and 0.3 as average clustering coefficient.
The 100 generated networks have a low variance on these values: 61% have
at most 10% discrepancy from the average results (see supplementary material
[11]).
E. Coli protein-protein interaction network. In [8] the protein-protein
interaction (PPI) network of E. Coli was published. The biggest connected
component of this network consist of 230 nodes, it has an average degree of
6.04, an average path length of 3.78, an average clustering coefficient of 0.22
and a heterogeneity index of 0.24.
Using the SN model we run tests having: {A, T, C} as alphabet, ATCATCTCATCACT
as structure of the only initial node, probability to mutate equal to 0.4, probability to duplicate equal to 0.6, unit distance equal to 2, using the file matches
considered to reproduce the MRSA gene network and nodes have a common
edge only if their Hamming distance is smaller/equal than 1.
The generated networks with 230 nodes have (average over 100 tests): 6.03 as
average degree, 3.85 as average path length, 0.47 as average clustering coefficient
and 0.26 as heterogeneity index. The variance of these networks is rather big:
only 3% have at most 10% dicsrepancy from the average results while only
24% have at most 20% discrepancy from the average results (see supplementary
material [11]). In general, we noticed that the probability to duplicate increases
the heterogeneity index of a network but also increases the variance of the
generated networks.
The degree distribution of the given network follows a power low with trend
γ = −1.06. The degree distribution of the networks generated by us also follow
a power law but (average over 100 tests) with trend γ = 0.72. It is remarkable
that the SN model is able to generate networks with a small number of nodes
having a power law as degree distribution.
The motif distribution of the generated networks having at most 20% discrepancy from the average results is equal to the one of the give network. The
7
clustering coefficient distribution of the given network has a trend γ = −0.52
while similar trend for the generated networks having at most 20% discrepancy
from the average results is γ = −0.47. The path length distribution of the given
network and of one of the generated networks having at most 20% discrepancy
from the average results is depicted in Fig. 3.
0.35
0.3
0.25
SN
E. Coli PPI
0.2
PL(ℓ)
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
0
2
4
6
8
10
ℓ
Figure 3: Path length distribution of the given E. Coli PPI network and a
typical outcome of the SN model (SN).
5
Final remarks
In this section we give some thoughts about the SN model and we suggest
possible directions for research on this model.
It seems that the SN model shows that preferential attachment is not necessary to generate networks having a power law degree distribution. Can it be
the preferential attachment is somehow ‘hidden’ in the SN model? We think
that preferential attachment is ‘hidden’ in the combination of structured nodes
and Hamming distance. Anyhow, it is surprising that these two simple concepts
(Hamming distance is rather simple when compared to the reasons behind the
interactions in gene and protein networks) can behave as preferential attachment
and, in some cases, (as for the average clustering coefficient being independent
from the network size or the high heterogeneity index) be better in reproducing
empirical networks.
The study on the SN model is still in its very early stages in order to allow
us to say something new about biological networks. We do not think that the
SN model can recreate all empirical networks or all features of some empirical
network, anyhow, it is interesting to note that this model can recreate a broad
range of topological features present in empirical networks of different nature.
Of course, the big number of input parameters (and their domain) of the SN
model allows to ‘tune’ some of the features of the generated networks more than
what possible with other network models.
As we said, we used a ‘trial-and-error’ approach in order to find the instances
of the SN model generating the networks considered by us. For some of these
networks we got pretty close results, for others less good results. We did not
8
aim to have an exact match for the empirical networks considered by us, we
aimed to show the broad range of topological features that can be matched by
the SN model.
It is definitely interesting to study the classes of networks that can be generated by the SN model upon changes in its input parameters. Moreover, extensions to the model will allow it to generate directed networks, to evolve networks
or to use the generated networks for other studies. For instance, one might need
to have networks with a specific motif distribution in order to study their dynamics.
Acknowledgements We gratefully acknowledge Ian Overton for providing the
MRSA network.
References
[1] R. Albert and A.-L. Barabàsi. Statistical mechanics of complex networks.
Reviews of Modern Physics, 74:47–97, 2002.
[2] U. Alon. An introduction to Systems Biology. Chapman & Hall, 2006.
[3] A.-L. Barabàsi and R. Albert. Emergence of scaling in random networks.
Science, 286:509–512, 1999.
[4] K. Deb. Multi-objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms.
Wiley-Blackwell, 2008.
[5] P. Erdös and A. Rényi. On random graphs. Publicationes Mathematicae,
6:290–297, 1959.
[6] E. Estrada.
Quantifying network heterogeneity.
Technical
Report 25, University of Strathclyde, 2010.
Available from
http://www.mathstat.strath.ac.uk/research/reports/2010.
[7] E. Estrada. Randić index, irregularity and complex biomolecular networks.
Acta Chimica Slovenica, 57:597–603, 2010.
[8] G. Butland et al. Interaction network containing conserved and essential
protein complexes in excherichia coli. Nature, 433:531–537, 2005.
[9] H. Jeong, B. Tombor, R. Albert, Z. N. Oltvai, and A. L. Barabási. The
large-scale organization of metabolic networks. Nature, 407:651–654, 2000.
[10] B. H. Junker and F. Schreiber, editors. Analysis of Biological Networks.
Wiley-Blackwell, 2008.
[11] Supplementary material. http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/∼pier/download.html.
[12] R. Milo, S. Itzkovitz, N. Kashtan, R. Levitt, S. Shen-Orr, I. Ayzenshtat,
M. Sheffer, and U. Alon. Superfamilies of evolved and designed networks.
Science, 303:1538–1542, 2004.
9
[13] R. Milo, S. Shen-Orr, S. Itzkovitz, N. Kashtan, D. Chklovskii, and U. Alon.
Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks. Science,
298(5594):824–827, 2002.
[14] E. Ravasz, A. L. Somera, D. A. Mongru, Z. N. Oltvai, and A. L. Barabási.
Hierarchical organization of modularity in metabolic networks. Science,
297:1551–1555, 2002.
[15] E. Ravasz, A. L. Somera, D. A. Mongru, Z. N. Oltvai, and A.-L. Barabási.
Hierarchical organization of modularity in metabolic networks. Science,
297:1551–1555, 2002.
[16] NWB Team. Network Workbench Tool. Indiana University and Northeastern University, 2006. http://nwb.slis.indiana.edu.
[17] D. J. Watts and S. H. Strogatz. Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature, 393:440–442, 1998.
[18] Wikipedia. http://www.wikipedia.org.
10
| 5cs.CE
|
Un résultat intrigant en commande sans modèle
Discussing an intriguing result on model-free control
Cédric Join1,5,6 , Emmanuel Delaleau2 , Michel Fliess3,5 , Claude H. Moog4
1
arXiv:1711.02877v1 [cs.SY] 8 Nov 2017
CRAN (CNRS, UMR 7039), Université de Lorraine, BP 239, 54506 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
[email protected]
2
Département de Mécatronique, École nationale d’ingénieurs de Brest, 29280 Plouzané, France.
[email protected]
3
LIX (CNRS, UMR 7161), École polytechnique, 91128 Palaiseau, France. [email protected]
4
LS2N (CNRS, UMR 6004), 44321 Nantes 03, France. [email protected]
5
AL.I.E.N. (ALgèbre pour Identification & Estimation Numériques), 7 rue Maurice Barrès, 54330 Vézelise, France.
{michel.fliess, cedric.join}@alien-sas.com
6
Projet Non-A, INRIA Lille – Nord-Europe, France
RÉSUMÉ. Un exemple mathématique élémentaire prouve, grâce au critère de Routh-Hurwitz, un résultat à l’encontre
de la pratique actuelle en commande sans modèle : il peut y avoir plus de difficultés à régler un correcteur proportionnel
« intelligent » (iP) qu’un proportionnel-dérivé intelligent (iPD). Les simulations numériques de l’iPD et d’un PID classique
tournent largement en faveur du premier. Introduction et conclusion analysent la commande sans modèle à la lumière des
avancées actuelles.
ABSTRACT. An elementary mathematical example proves, thanks to the Routh-Hurwitz criterion, a result that is intriguing with respect to today’s practical understanding of model-free control, i.e., an “intelligent” proportional controller
(iP) may turn to be more difficult to tune than an intelligent proportional-derivative one (iPD). The vast superiority of iPDs
when compared to classic PIDs is shown via computer simulations. The introduction as well as the conclusion analyse
model-free control in the light of recent advances.
MOTS-CLÉS. Commande sans modèle, correcteurs iP, correcteurs iPD, PID, critère de Routh-Hurwitz, réparation, apprentissage, intelligence artificielle.
KEYWORDS. Model-free control, iP controllers, iPD controllers, PID, Routh-Hurwitz criterion, fault accommodation, machine learning, artificial intelligence.
La première fois qu’Aurélien vit Bérénice, il la trouva franchement laide.
Aragon (Aurélien. Paris : Gallimard, 1944)
1.
Introduction
1.1. Généralités
Les faits suivants sont connus de tout automaticien :
— Écrire un « bon » modèle mathématique d’une machine réelle, c’est-à-dire non idéalisée, comme en
physique fondamentale, est redoutable, voire impossible. Ainsi s’explique la popularité industrielle
stupéfiante des correcteurs PID (voir, par exemple, [Åström & Hägglund (2006)],
[Franklin et coll. (2015)], [Janert (2014)], [Lunze (1996)], [O’Dwyer (2009)],
[Rotella & Zambettakis (2008)]). Une telle modélisation y est sans objet.
— Le tribut est lourd :
— performances médiocres,
— défaut de robustesse,
— réglage laborieux des gains.
c 2017 ISTE OpenScience – Published by ISTE Ltd. London, UK – openscience.fr
Page | 1
La « commande sans modèle », ou model-free control, [Fliess & Join (2013)] et ses correcteurs « intelligents » ont été inventés pour combler ces lacunes. De nombreuses publications récentes, dans les
domaines les plus divers, démontrent leur efficacité et simplicité, non seulement en France, mais aussi,
et même davantage, à l’étranger : voir, par exemple, les références de [Fliess & Join (2013)], et
[Abouaïssa et coll. (2017b)], [Abouaïssa et coll. (2017a)] et leurs références.
La bibliographie de [Fliess & Join (2013)] atteste que la dénomination model-free control apparaît
maintes fois dans la littérature, mais en des sens distincts du nôtre. L’importance croissante de l’intelligence artificielle et de l’apprentissage, au travers des réseaux de neurones notamment, s’est fort naturellement greffée au sans-modèle : voir, par exemple, [Cheon et coll. (2015)], [Lillicrap et coll. (2016)],
[Luo et coll. (2016)], [Mnih et coll. (2015)], [Radac & Precup (2017)], [Radac et coll. (2017)]. Nos techniques, sans nul besoin de calculs lourds [Join et coll. (2013)], éludent cette tendance actuelle de l’informatique (voir [Gédouin et coll. (2011)], [Lafont et coll. (2015)], [Menhour et coll. (2017)] pour des
illustrations concrètes).
1.2. Bref aperçu de la commande sans modèle 1
On remplace le modèle global inconnu par le modèle ultra-local :
y (ν) = F + αu
(1)
— Les variables u et y désignent respectivement la commande et la sortie.
— L’ordre de dérivation, choisi par l’ingénieur, ν ≥ 1 est 1, en général. Parfois, ν = 2. On n’a jamais
rencontré ν ≥ 3 en pratique.
— L’ingénieur décide du paramètre α ∈ R de sorte que les trois termes de (1) aient même magnitude.
Une identification précise de α est, donc, sans objet.
— On estime F grâce aux mesures de u et y.
— F subsume non seulement la structure inconnue du système mais aussi les perturbations externes 2 .
Si ν = 2, on ferme la boucle avec un régulateur intelligent proportionnel-intégral-dérivé, ou iPID, c’està-dire une généralisation des PID classiques,
R
Festim − ÿ ∗ − KP e − KI e − KD ė
(2)
u=−
α
— Festim est une estimée F .
— y ∗ est la trajectoire de référence.
— e = y ∗ − y est l’erreur de poursuite.
— KP , KI , KD ∈ R sont les gains.
Il vient, d’après (1) et (2),
Z
ë + KD ė + KP e + KI e = Festim − F
(3)
On obtient une « bonne » poursuite si l’estimée Festim est « bonne », c’est-à-dire F − Festim ' 0. Contrairement aux PID classiques, (3) prouve la facilité, ici, du choix des gains.
1. Pour plus de détails, voir [Fliess & Join (2013)].
2. Cette distinction entre structure interne et perturbations externes se retrouve partout. Elle ne présente, à notre avis, aucune évidence a priori. Les confondre est une percée conceptuelle indubitable. Comparer avec « la commande par rejet actif de perturbations »,
ou Active Disturbance Rejection (ADRC) (voir, par exemple, [Sira-Ramírez et coll. (2017)]).
c 2017 ISTE OpenScience – Published by ISTE Ltd. London, UK – openscience.fr
Page | 2
Si KD = 0 on a un régulateur intelligent proportionnel-intégral, ou iPI,
R
Festim − ÿ ∗ − KP e − KI e
u=−
α
Si KI = 0 on a un régulateur intelligent proportionnel-dérivé, ou iPD,
Festim − ÿ ∗ − KP e − KD ė
u=−
α
(4)
Le plus fréquemment, ν = 1. On obtient alors un régulateur intelligent proportionnel, ou iP,
u=−
Festim − ẏ ∗ − KP e
α
(5)
Remarque. Voir [Delaleau (2014)] pour une autre approche de la stabilisation.
Voici deux exceptions où un iPD est employé avec ν = 2 : [De Miras et coll. (2013)],
[Menhour et coll. (2017)] 3 .
1.3. But
Cet article exhibe un exemple linéaire, ÿ − ẏ = u, a priori élémentaire, où un iPD doit remplacer un
iP, contrairement à ce que l’on aurait pu croire naïvement. L’explication repose sur le critère bien connu
de Routh-Hurwitz (voir, par exemple, [Gantmacher (1966)]). Il démontre l’« étroitesse » de l’ensemble
des paramètres stabilisants {α, KP } en (5).
1.4. Plan
Le paragraphe 2. présente notre exemple et les excellents résultats obtenus avec un iPD. Au paragraphe suivant, les difficultés rencontrées avec un iP sont expliquées grâce au critère de Routh-Hurwitz.
L’équivalence démontrée en [d’Andréa-Novel et coll. (2010)], [Fliess & Join (2013)] entre PID et iPD
nous conduit à comparer leurs performances au paragraphe 4. : l’avantage des iPD y est manifeste. On
en déduit en conclusion quelques pistes de réflexions sur les correcteurs intelligents associés au sansmodèle.
2.
Notre exemple
2.1. Présentation
Soit le système linéaire, stationnaire et instable,
ÿ − ẏ = u
(6)
3. La littérature sur les illustrations du sans-modèle contient plusieurs exemples avec emploi d’un iPID et ν = 2, mais sans justification aucune, comme l’absence de frottements [Fliess & Join (2013)]. Un iP avec ν = 1 aurait suffi peut-être. D’où une implantation
encore plus simple.
c 2017 ISTE OpenScience – Published by ISTE Ltd. London, UK – openscience.fr
Page | 3
Commande
Sortie
15
1.2
1
10
0.8
5
0.6
0.4
0
0.2
-5
0
-10
-0.2
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0
5
Time(s)
10
15
20
25
30
Time(s)
(a) Commande
(b) Sortie, trajectoire de référence (- -)
Figure 1.: iPD
D’après (1), il vient, si ν = 1,
F = −αÿ + (1 + α)ẏ
(7)
L’iP déduit des calculs de [Fliess & Join (2013)] fonctionne mal.
2.2. iPD
Avec un iPD (4), ν = 2 en (1), on remplace (7) par
F = (1 − α)ÿ + αẏ
Les simulations numériques de la figure 1, déduites des calculs de [Fliess & Join (2013)], sont excellentes. On choisit α = 0.5 et les gains KP and KD tels que (s + 0.5)2 est le polynôme caractéristique de
la dynamique d’erreur. On introduit un bruit additif de sortie, blanc, centré et gaussien, d’écart type 0.01.
La condition initiale est y(0) = −0.05.
3.
Pourquoi l’implantation de l’iP échoue-t-elle ?
Tentons de comprendre l’échec de l’implantation de l’iP. Il vient pour (3) :
ė + KP e = Festim − F
(8)
où F provient de (7). Il est loisible d’écrire Festim dans le domaine opérationnel (voir, par exemple,
[Erdélyi (1962)]) :
Festim = −α
s2
s
y
+
(1
+
α)
y
(T s + 1)2
(T s + 1)
(9)
— Festim et y sont les analogues opérationnels 4 de Festim et y,
4. La terminologie « transformées de Laplace » est beaucoup plus usuelle, comme chacun le sait.
c 2017 ISTE OpenScience – Published by ISTE Ltd. London, UK – openscience.fr
Page | 4
(a) Pour tout T
(b) T = 0.1s
Figure 2.: Domaine de stabilité pour (KP , α, T )
s
(T s+1)
2
s
et (T s+1)
2 représentent des filtres dérivateurs d’ordres 1 et 2, où T > 0 est la constante de
temps (voir, par exemple, [Leich & Boite (1980)]).
Il est loisible de poser y ∗ ≡ 0 pour étudier la stabilité. Alors, e = −y. Grâce à (6)-(9), on obtient le
polynôme caractéristique
KP
1
KP
1
2 KP
2 4
3
2
2
− 2T
T s + s (2T − T ) + s −2T + T (1 + ) − T
+s
−
α
α
α
α
α
On utilise le critère de stabilité de Routh-Hurwitz (voir, par exemple, [Gantmacher (1966)], et
[Franklin et coll. (2015)], [Lunze (1996)], [Rotella & Zambettakis (2008)]). La figure 2 montre, avec
une discrétisation convenable, l’étroitesse de l’ensemble {α, KP } des paramètres stabilisants, y compris en tenant compte de la constante de temps T . La difficulté de trouver un iP satisfaisant pour (6) se
trouve confirmée. Ajoutons que la valeur « évidente » α = −1 ne convient jamais 5 .
—
4.
Comparaison entre iPD et PID
En [d’Andréa-Novel et coll. (2010)], [Fliess & Join (2013)] est démontrée une certaine équivalence
entre iPD (4) et PID usuels :
Z
u = kP e + kI e + kD ė (kP , kI , kD ∈ R)
5. La valeur α = −1 est « évidente » car, alors, F = ÿ en (7). On retrouve (6).
c 2017 ISTE OpenScience – Published by ISTE Ltd. London, UK – openscience.fr
Page | 5
Commande
Sortie
3
1.2
1
2
0.8
1
0.6
0
0.4
-1
0.2
-2
0
-3
-0.2
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0
5
10
Time(s)
15
20
25
30
Time(s)
(a) Commande
(b) Sortie, trajectoire de référence (- -)
Figure 3.: PID
Commande
Sortie
4
1.2
3
1
2
0.8
1
0.6
0
0.4
-1
0.2
-2
0
-3
-0.2
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0
5
Time(s)
10
15
20
25
30
Time(s)
(a) Commande
(b) Sortie, trajectoire de référence (- -)
Figure 4.: PID avec δ = 0.8
On détermine kP , kI , kD de sorte que (s + 0.66)3 soit le polynôme caractéristique de la dynamique
d’erreur. On assure ainsi un temps de réponse égal à celui du paragraphe 2.2., à ±5% près. Les résultats
de la figure 3 sont satisfaisants 6 quoiqu’inférieurs à ceux de la figure 1 pour l’iPD 7 . Afin de tester la
robustesse, modifions (6) :
ÿ − ẏ = δu
où δ, 0 ≤ δ ≤ 1, correspond à une perte de puissance de l’actionneur 8 . Avec δ = 0.8, figures 4 and 5
révèlent un meilleur comportement de l’iPD. Cette supériorité s’accentue si δ = 0.5 : voir figures 6 et 7.
6. Un réglage plus soigneux du PID les améliorerait peut-être.
7. Même bruit qu’au paragraphe 2.2.
8. Comparer avec la « réparation », ou fault accommodation, en [Fliess & Join (2013)]. Voir, aussi, [Lafont et coll. (2015)].
c 2017 ISTE OpenScience – Published by ISTE Ltd. London, UK – openscience.fr
Page | 6
Commande
Sortie
15
1.2
1
10
0.8
5
0.6
0.4
0
0.2
-5
0
-10
-0.2
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0
5
10
Time(s)
15
20
25
30
Time(s)
(a) Commande
(b) Sortie, trajectoire de référence (- -)
Figure 5.: iPD avec δ = 0.8
Commande
Sortie
4
1.2
3
1
2
0.8
1
0.6
0
0.4
-1
0.2
-2
0
-3
-0.2
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0
5
10
Time(s)
15
20
25
30
Time(s)
(a) Commande
(b) Sortie, trajectoire de référence (- -)
Figure 6.: PID avec δ = 0.5
Commande
Sortie
15
1.2
1
10
0.8
5
0.6
0.4
0
0.2
-5
0
-10
-0.2
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0
5
Time(s)
10
15
20
25
30
Time(s)
(a) Commande
(b) Sortie, trajectoire de référence (- -)
Figure 7.: iPD avec δ = 0.5
c 2017 ISTE OpenScience – Published by ISTE Ltd. London, UK – openscience.fr
Page | 7
5.
Conclusion
Diverses questions découlent de cette étude :
1. L’iP et l’iPD sont les deux seuls correcteurs intelligents qui devraient importer. Les autres, comme
iPI et iPID, ne joueront, sans doute, qu’un rôle marginal.
2. L’iPD s’impose ici grâce à l’examen d’une équation donnée. Exhiber d’autres équations de systèmes jouissant de cette propriété est un but intellectuel légitime. Mais que faire sans modèle ?
Procéder par essais et erreurs ? Tenir compte des propriétés qualitatives de la machine ? Un mélange des deux ? Voilà encore une interrogation épistémologique nouvelle, due au surgissement de
la commande sans modèle 9 .
3. La preuve repose sur le choix des filtres dérivateurs. Une analyse indépendante d’une telle approche
reste à découvrir. Elle permettrait une meilleure compréhension du phénomène.
Bibliographie
ABOUAÏSSA H., ALHAJ HASAN O., JOIN C., FLIESS M., DEFER D., « Energy saving for building heating via a simple
and efficient model-free control design : First steps with computer simulations ». 21st International Conference on System
Theory, Control and Computing, Sinaia, 2017a. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01568899/en/
ABOUAÏSSA H., FLIESS M., JOIN C., « On ramp metering : Towards a better understanding of ALINEA via model-free
control ». International Journal of Control, 90 (2017b) : 1018-1026.
d’ANDRÉA-NOVEL B., FLIESS M., JOIN C., MOUNIER H., STEUX B., « A mathematical explanation via “intelligent” PID
controllers of the strange ubiquity of PIDs ». 18th Mediterranean Conference on Control & Automation, Marrakech, 2010.
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inria-00480293/en/
ÅSTRÖM K.J., HÄGGLUND T., Advanced PID Control. Research Triangle Park, NJ : Instrument Society of America, 2006.
CHEON K., KIM J., HAMADACHE M., LEE D., « On replacing PID controller with deep learning controller for DC motor
system ». Journal of Automation and Control Engineering, 3 (2015) : 452-456.
DELALEAU E., « A proof of stability of model-free control ». 2014 IEEE Conference on Norbert Wiener in the 21st Century
(21CW), Boston, 2014.
DE MIRAS J., JOIN C., FLIESS M., RIACHY S., BONNET S., « Active magnetic bearing : A new step for model-free
control ». 52nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Florence, 2013.
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00857649/en/
ERDÉLYI A., Operational Calculus and Generalized Functions. New York : Holt Rinehart and Winston, 1962.
FLIESS M., JOIN C., « Model-free control ». International Journal of Control, 86 (2013) : 2228-2252.
FRANKLIN G.F., POWELL J.D., EMAMI-NAEINI A., Feedback Control of Dynamic Systems (7th ed.). Harlow : Pearson,
2015.
GANTMACHER F.R., Théorie des matrices, t. 2 (traduit du russe). Paris : Dunod, 1966.
GÉDOUIN P.-A., DELALEAU E., BOURGEOT J.-M., JOIN C., ARBAB CHIRANI S., CALLOCH S., « Experimental comparison of classical PID and model-free control: Position control of a shape memory alloy active spring ». Control Engineering
Practice, 19 (2011) : 433-441.
JANERT P.K., Feedback Control for Computer Systems. Sebastopol, CA : O’Reilly Media, 2014.
JOIN C., CHAXEL F., FLIESS M., « “Intelligent” controllers on cheap and small programmable devices ». 2nd International
Conference on Control and Fault-Tolerant Systems, Nice, 2013.
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00845795/en/
LAFONT F., BALMAT J.-F., PESSEL N., FLIESS M., « A model-free control strategy for an experimental greenhouse with
an application to fault accommodation ». Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 110 (2015) : 139-149.
9. À ce sujet, voir aussi la conclusion de [Fliess & Join (2013)].
c 2017 ISTE OpenScience – Published by ISTE Ltd. London, UK – openscience.fr
Page | 8
LEICH H., BOITE J., Les filtres numériques : Analyse et synthèse des filtres unidimensionnels. Paris : Masson, 2013.
LILLICRAP T.P., HUNT J.J., PRITZEL A., HEESS N., EREZ T., TASSA Y., SILVER D., WIERSTRA D., « Continuous control
with deep reinforcement learning ». 6th International Conference on Learning Representations, Vancouver, 2016.
LUNZE J., Regelungstheorie 1. Berlin : Springer, 1996.
LUO B., LIU D., HUANG T., WANG D., « Model-free optimal tracking control via critic-only Q-learning ». IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 27 (2016) : 2134-2144.
MENHOUR L., D’ANDRÉA-NOVEL B., FLIESS M., GRUYER D., MOUNIER H., « An efficient model-free setting for longitudinal and lateral vehicle control. Validation through the interconnected pro-SiVIC/RTMaps prototyping platform ».
IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, (2017) : DOI: 10.1109/TITS.2017.2699283
MNIH V., KAVUKCUOGLU K., SILVER D., RUSU A.A., VENESS J., BELLEMARE M.G., GRAVES A., RIEDMILLER M.,
FIDJELAND A.K., OSTROVSKI G., PETERSEN S., BEATTIE C., SADIK A., ANTONOGLOU I., KING H., KUMARAN D.,
WIERSTRA D., LEGG S., HASSABIS D., « Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning ». Nature, 518
(2015) : 529-533.
O’DWYER A., Handbook of PI and PID Controller Tuning Rules (3rd ed.). Londres : Imperial College Press, 2009.
RADAC M.-B., PRECUP R.E., « Data-driven model-free slip control of anti-lock braking systems using reinforcement
Q-learning ». Neurocomputing, (2017) : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2017.08.036
RADAC M.-B., PRECUP R.E., ROMAN R.C., « Model-free control performance improvement using virtual reference feedback tuning and reinforcement Q-learning ». International Journal of Control, 48 (2017) : 1071-1083.
ROTELLA F., ZAMBETTAKIS I., Automatique élémentaire. Paris : Hermès-Lavoisier, 2008.
S IRA -R AMÍREZ H., L UVIANO -J UÁREZ A., R AMÍREZ -N ERIA M., Z URITA -B USTAMANTE E.W., Active Disturbance Rejection Control of Dynamic Systems: A Flatness Based Approach. Oxford & Cambridge, MA : Elsevier, 2017.
c 2017 ISTE OpenScience – Published by ISTE Ltd. London, UK – openscience.fr
Page | 9
| 2cs.AI
|
TLP 12 (4–5): 421–426, July 2012.
arXiv:1210.3937v1 [cs.PL] 15 Oct 2012
DOI: 10.1017/S1471068412000300
c 2012 Cambridge University Press
1
Printed in the United Kingdom
Introduction to the 28th International
Conference on Logic Programming
Special Issue
Agostino Dovier
Dip. di Matematica e Informatica, Univ. di Udine, Italy
(e-mail: [email protected])
Vı́tor Santos Costa
CRACS INESC-TEC and Dep. de Ciência de Computadores, Univ. do Porto, Portugal
(e-mail: [email protected])
submitted 1 January 2003; revised 1 January 2003; accepted 1 January 2003
We are proud to introduce this special issue of the Journal of Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP), dedicated to the full papers accepted for the
28th International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP). The ICLP meetings
started in Marseille in 1982 and since then constitute the main venue for presenting
and discussing work in the area of logic programming.
We contributed to ICLP for the first time in 1991. The first guest-editor had
a paper on logic programming with sets, and the second had two papers on the
parallel implementation of the Andorra model. Since then, we continued pursuing
research in this exciting area and ICLP has always been the major venue for our
work. Thus, when the ALP EC committee kindly invited us for chairing the 2012
edition we were delighted to accept.
We particularly appreciate the honor and responsability of organising ICLP in
Budapest. Hungary has had a central role both in implementation and in the application of logic programming. Indeed, the role of Hungary in general in Computer
Science is widely recognized, and organizing this meeting in the town of John von
Neumann, one of the “talent-scouts” of Turing, in the centenary of the birth of the
latter, is just another reason for justifying the fact that the fascinating Budapest
is the unique town to host ICLP twice.
Publishing the ICLP full papers as a special issue is a joint initiative taken by
the Association for Logic Programming and by Cambridge University Press. The
goal is to achieve fast journal publication of the highest quality papers from the
logic programming community, by selecting the best ICLP submissions before the
meeting. This approach benefits the authors, by facilitating journal publication,
and benefits the community, by allowing researchers to access high quality journal
papers on the more recent and important results in the field. Quality is ensured by a
two-step refereeing process, and by an active and very much participating program
committee. The approach was first experimented in 2010, and has had favorable
feedback since.
2
A. Dovier and V. Santos Costa
This year, ICLP sought contributions in all areas of logic programming, including but not restricted to the following areas. Theory: Semantic Foundations, Formalisms, Non- monotonic Reasoning, Knowledge Representation; Implementation:
Compilation, Memory Management, Virtual Machines, Parallelism; Environments:
Program Analysis, Transformation, Validation, Verification, Debugging, Profiling,
Testing; Language Issues: Concurrency, Objects, Coordination, Mobility, Higher
Order, Types, Modes, Assertions, Programming Techniques; Related Paradigms:
Abductive Logic Programming, Inductive Logic Programming, Constraint Logic
Programming, Answer-Set Programming; Applications: Databases, Data Integration and Federation, Software Engineering, Natural Language Processing, Web and
Semantic Web, Agents, Artificial Intelligence, Bioinformatics.
In response to the call for papers we received 102 abstracts, 90 of which remained as complete submissions. Of these, 81 were submitted as full papers and 9
as technical communications. Each paper was reviewed by at least three anonymous
program committee members, selected by the program chairs. Sub-reviewers were
allowed. After discussion, involving the whole program committee, 10 submitted
papers were considered as deserving of TPLP publication with minor changes. The
authors of other 10 submitted paper were asked to address more serious concerns,
mostly regarding presentation improvements or more complete experimental validation. 37 papers instead have been judged to deserve a slot for a short presentation
at the Meeting and a “technical communication” publication in the Volume 17 of
the Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs) series.
The whole set of accepted papers includes 36 technical papers, 12 application
papers, 5 system and tool papers, and 4 papers submitted directly as technical
communications.
The Conference program was honored to include contributions from three keynote
speakers and from a tutorialist. Two invited speakers come from industry, namely
Ferenc Darvas from ThalesNano (a Budapest company specialized in developing
and providing microscale flow instruments for chemistry), and Mike Elston from
SecuritEase (an Australian company developing stock brokering tools). Moreover,
Jan Wielemaker, of the VU University Amsterdam, presented an history of the
first 25 years of SWI Prolog, one of the major (and free) Prolog releases. Tutorialist
Viviana Mascardi from University of Genova (Italy) introduced us to the hot topic
of “Logic-based Agents and the Semantic Web”.
The first ICLP Conference was organized 30 years to this year, in Marseille.
During those 30 years, ICLP has been a major venue in Computer Science. In order
to acknowledge some of the major contributions that have been fundamental to the
success of LP as a field, the ALP executive committee decided that ICLP should
recognize the most influential papers presented in the ICLP and ILPS conferences
(ILPS was another major meeting in logic programming, organized until 1998), that,
10 and 20 years onwards, have been shown to be a major influence in the field. As
program co-chairs of ICLP2012, we were the first to be charged with this delicate
task. We included papers from ICLP 1992 and ILPS 1992 , 20 years onwards, and of
ICLP 2002, 10 years onwards. Our procedure was to use biblio-metric information
Introduction to the 28th ICLP Special Issue
3
in a first stage, and to use our own personal criteria in a second stage, if necessary.
Given that this is the first time this award was given we also considered 1991, and
2001 papers. Although there are an impressive number of excellent papers in 1991
and 1992, one paper emerges with an outstanding record of roughly 600 citations.
Further, the paper clearly has a very major influence in the field. The paper is
• Michael Gelfond and Vladimir Lifschitz: Representing Actions in Extended
Logic Programming. JICSLP 1992: 559-573
The 10 years onward analysis again produced a group of excellent papers (as
expected, the number of citations was strictly less than for 20 years old papers). In
this case choosing the winner in a very short list was more difficult. Ackowledging
their influence over the very active field of Web Databases and Semantic Web, our
selection went to:
• François Bry and Sebastian Schaffert: Towards a Declarative Query and Transformation Language for XML and Semistructured Data: Simulation Unification. ICLP 2002: 255-270
We therefore invited these authors for an invited talk in a special session at the
meeting. We would like to remark that in 2004 three papers were prized as “Most
Influential Paper in 20 Years Award from the Association for Logic Programming”.
The award went (again) to Gelfond-Lifschitz for their 1988 ICLP/SLP paper on
stable model semantics, to Jaffar-Lassez for their POPL 1987 paper on Constraint
Logic Programming, and to Saraswat, Rinard, and Panangaden for their POPL
1991 paper on Concurrent Constraint Programming.
Together, the journal special issue and the LIPIcs volume of short technical communications constitute the proceedings of ICLP 2012. The list of the 20 accepted
full papers appearing in this special issue follows:
Disjunctive Datalog with Existential Quantifiers: Semantics, Decidability, and Complexity Issues
Mario Alviano, Wolfgang Faber, Nicola Leone, and Marco Manna
Towards Multi-Threaded Local Tabling Using a Common Table Space
Miguel Areias and Ricardo Rocha
Module Theorem for the General Theory of Stable Models
Joseph Babb and Joohyung Lee
Typed Answer Set Programming Lambda Calculus and Corresponding Inverse
Lambda Algorithms
Chitta Baral, Juraj Dzifcak, Marcos Gonzalez, and Aaron Gottesman
D-FLAT: Declarative Problem Solving Using Tree Decompositions and Answer-Set
Programming
4
A. Dovier and V. Santos Costa
Bernhard Bliem, Michael Morak, and Stefan Woltran
An Improved Proof-Theoretic Compilation of Logic Programs
Iliano Cervesato
Annotating Answer-Set Programs in LANA
Marina De Vos, Doga Gizem Kisa, Johannes Oetsch, Jörg Pührer, and
Hans Tompits
SMCHR: Satisfiability Modulo Constraint Handling Rules
Gregory Duck
Conflict-driven ASP Solving with External Sources
Thomas Eiter, Michael Fink, Thomas Krennwallner, and Christoph Redl
Multi-threaded ASP Solving with clasp
Martin Gebser, Benjamin Kaufmann, and Torsten Schaub
Model Checking with Probabilistic Tabled Logic Programming
Andrey Gorlin, C. R. Ramakrishnan, and Scott Smolka
Diagrammatic confluence for Constraint Handling Rules
Rémy Haemmerlé
Inference in Probabilistic Logic Programs with Continuous Random Variables
Muhammad Islam, C.R. Ramakrishnan, and I.V. Ramakrishnan
Relational Theories with Null Values and Non-Herbrand Stable Models
Vladimir Lifschitz, Karl Pichotta, and Fangkai Yang
The Relative Expressiveness of Defeasible Logics
Michael Maher
Compiling Finite Domain Constraints to SAT with BEE
Amit Metodi and Michael Codish
Lightweight Compilation of (C)LP to JavaScript
Jose F. Morales, Rémy Haemmerlé, Manuel Carro, and Manuel
Hermenegildo
ASP modulo CSP: The clingcon system
Max Ostrowski and Torsten Schaub
Annotation of Logic Programs for Independent AND-Parallelism by Partial Evalu-
Introduction to the 28th ICLP Special Issue
5
ation
German Vidal
Efficient Tabling of Structured Data with Enhanced Hash-Consing
Neng-Fa Zhou and Christian Theil Have
The technical communications, a short paper, and the contributions to the doctoral consortium are published on-line through the Dagstuhl Research Online Publication Server (DROPS), as DOI 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICLP.2012.42. A listing of these
papers is reported in the electronic appendix to this preface.
We would like to take this opportunity to acknowledge and thank the other ICLP
organisers. Without their work and support this event would not have been possible. We would like to start with the General chair Péter Szeredi (Budapest Univ.
of Technology and Economics), and all the organizing chairs, namely the Workshop Chair Mats Carlsson (SICS, Sweden), the Doctoral Consortium Chairs Marco
Gavanelli (Univ. of Ferrara) and Stefan Woltran (Vienna University of Technology), the Prolog Programming Contest Chair Tom Schrijvers (Universiteit Gent),
the Publicity Chair Gergely Lukácsy (Cisco Systems Inc.), and the Web Manager: János Csorba (Budapest Univ. of Technology and Economics). Thanks also
to Alessandro Dal Palù for allowing us to publish his pictures of Budapest on the
website. We benefited from material and advice kindly given by last year’s program
chairs Michael Gelfond and John Gallagher. Thank you very much!
On behalf of the whole LP community, we would like to thank all authors who
have submitted a paper, the 41 members of the program committee: Elvira Albert
(U.C. Madrid), Sergio Antoy (Portland State Univ.), Marcello Balduccini (Kodak
Research Laboratories), Manuel Carro (Technical University of Madrid (UPM)),
Michael Codish (Ben Gurion Univ.), Veronica Dahl (Simon Fraser Univ.), Marina
De Vos (Univ. of Bath), Alessandro Dal Palù (Universita degli Studi di Parma), Bart
Demoen (K.U. Leuven), Thomas Eiter (T.U. Wien), Esra Erdem (Sabanci University), Thom Frühwirth (Univ. of Ulm), Andrea Formisano (Univ. of Perugia), Maria
Garcia de la Banda (Monash Univ.), Marco Gavanelli (University of Ferrara), HaiFeng Guo (Univ. of Nebraska, Omaha), Gopal Gupta (Univ. of Texas, Dallas), Katsumi Inoue (National Inst. of Informatics, Japan), Angelika Kimmig (K.U. Leuven),
Joohyung Lee (Arizona State University), Evelina Lamma (Univ. of Ferrara), Nicola
Leone (University of Calabria), Yuliya Lierler (Univ. of Kentucky), Boon Thau Loo
(Univ. of Pennsylvania), Michael Maher (R.R.I., Sydney), Alessandra Mileo (DERI
Galway), Jose Morales (U.P. Madrid), Enrico Pontelli (New Mexico State Univ.),
Gianfranco Rossi (Univ. of Parma), Beata Sarna-Starosta (Cambian, Vancouver),
Torsten Schaub (Univ. of Potsdam), Tom Schrijvers (Universiteit Gent), Fernando
Silva (Univ. of Porto), Tran Cao Son (New Mexico State University), Terrance
Swift (Univ. Nova de Lisboa), Péter Szeredi (Budapest Univ. of Technology and
Economics), Francesca Toni (Imperial College London), Mirek Truszczynski (University of Kentucky), Germán Vidal (U.P. of Valencia), Stefan Woltran (Vienna
University of Technology), and Neng-Fa Zhou (CUNY, New York).
6
A. Dovier and V. Santos Costa
A particular thanks goes to the 96 external referees, namely: Alicia Villanueva,
Amira Zaki, Ana Paula Tomás, Andrea Bracciali, Antonis Bikakis, Antonis Kakas,
Brian Devries, C. R. Ramakrishnan, Chiaki Sakama, Christoph Redl, Christopher
Mears, Dale Miller, Daniel De Schreye, Daniela Inclezan, David Brown, Demis
Ballis, Dimitar Shterionov, Dragan Ivanovic, Evgenia Ternovska, Fabio Fioravanti,
Fabrizio Riguzzi, Fangkai Yang, Fausto Spoto, Feliks Kluźniak, Francesco Calimeri,
Francesco Ricca, Fred Mesnard, Gianluigi Greco, Giovanni Grasso, Gregory Duck,
Gregory Gelfond, Inês Dutra, Jesus M. Almendros-Jimenez, Joost Vennekens, Juan
Manuel Crespo, Julio Mariño, Kyle Marple, Marco Alberti, Marco Maratea, Mario
Alviano, Mário Florido, Marius Schneider, Martin Gebser, Masakazu Ishihata, Massimiliano Cattafi, Matthias Knorr, Maurice Bruynooghe, Max Ostrowski, Michael
Bartholomew, Michael Hanus, Michael Morak, Minh Dao-Tran, Mutsunori Banbara, Naoki Nishida, Naoyuki Tamura, Neda Saeedloei, Nicola Capuano, Nicolas Schwind, Noson Yanofsky, Nysret Musliu, Orkunt Sabuncu, Pablo Chico De
Guzmán Paolo Torroni, Paul Tarau, Peter James Stuckey, Peter Schüller, Philipp
Obermeier, Puri Arenas-Sanchez, Rémy Haemmerlé, Rafael Del Vado Virsela, Ricardo Rocha, Richard Min, Robert Craven, Roland Kaminski, Samir Genaim, Sandeep
Chintabathina, Santiago Escobar, Sara Girotto, Sean Policarpio, Simona Perri, Slim
Abdennadher, Sofia Gomes, Stefania Costantini, Stefano Bistarelli, Thomas Krennwallner, Thomas Ströder, Tomoya Tanjo, Torben Mogensen, Umut Oztok, Valerio
Senni, Victor Marek, Victor Pablos Ceruelo, Wolfgang Dvořák, Wolfgang Faber,
Yana Todorova, and Yunsong Meng.
Throughout this period, we could always rely on ALP. Our gratitude goes to the
ALP president Gopal Gupta, to the Conference chair Manuel (Manolo) Carro, and
to all the ALP Executive committe members. We already thanked the invited speakers and the tutorialist above, but we would like to stress here our thank to them.
David Tranah (Cambridge) and Ilkka Niemelä (TPLP editor) deserve our thanks
for their kindness and their precious support in all publication stages. Similarly, a
thanks goes to Marc Herbstritt from Dagstuhl, Leibniz Center for Informatics, for
the support in publication of the Technical Communication.
Our thanks also go to the the sponsors of the meeting, namely the Association for Logic Programming (ALP), the Artificial Intelligence Section of the John
von Neumann Computer Society, the Aquincum Institute of Technology (AIT) of
Budapest, Alerant System Inc, and Google (female researchers grant). Finally, a
well-deserved thank you goes to Easychair developers and managers. This amazing free software allowed us to save days of low level activities. Similarly, the joint
work of the two co-chairs would have been extremely more difficult and expensive
without the Dropbox and Skype services.
September 2012
Agostino Dovier and Vı́tor Santos Costa
Program Committee Chairs and Guest Editors
Introduction to the 28th ICLP Special Issue
7
This electronic appendix reports the contents of the Volume 17, Issue 1 (DOI
10.4230/LIPIcs.ICLP.2012.42) of the Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs) series, published on-line through the Dagstuhl Research Online
Publication Server (DROPS) publishing position papers, technical communications,
and doctoral consortium contributed to the 28th International Conference on Logic
Programming (ICLP 2012).
Position Paper
Simulation Unification: Beyond Querying Semistructured Data
François Bry, Sebastian Schaffert
Technical Communication
A Logic Programming approach for Access Control over RDF
Nuno Lopes, Sabrina Kirrane, Antoine Zimmermann, Axel Polleres and
Alessandra Mileo
Modeling Machine Learning and Data Mining Problems with FO(·)
Hendrik Blockeel, Bart Bogaerts, Maurice Bruynooghe, Broes De Cat,
Stef De Pooter, Marc Denecker, Anthony Labarre, Jan Ramon and Sicco
Verwer.
Paving the Way for Temporal Grounding
Felicidad Aguado, Pedro Cabalar, Martı́n Diéguez, Gilberto Pérez and
Concepcion Vidal.
Preprocessing of Complex Non-Ground Rules in Answer Set Programming
Michael Morak and Stefan Woltran.
Two-Valued Logic Programs
Vladimir Lifschitz.
LOG-IDEAH: ASP for Architectonic Asset Preservation
Marina De Vos, Julian Padget, Vivana Novelli and Dina D’Ayala.
aspeed: ASP-based Solver Scheduling
Holger Hoos, Roland Kaminski, Torsten Schaub and Marius Schneider.
Static Type Inference for the Q language using Constraint Logic Programming
Zsolt Zombori, János Csorba and Péter Szeredi.
ASP at Work: An ASP Implementation of PhyloWS
8
A. Dovier and V. Santos Costa
Enrico Pontelli, Tiep Le, Hieu Nguyen and Tran Cao Son.
Improving Quality and Efficiency in Home Health Care: an application of Constraint
Logic Programming for the Ferrara NHS unit
Massimiliano Cattafi, Rosa Herrero, Marco Gavanelli, Maddalena Nonato
and Juan José Ramos Gonzalez.
An FLP-Style Answer-Set Semantics for Abstract-Constraint Programs with Disjunctions
Johannes Oetsch, Jörg Pührer and Hans Tompits.
A Tarskian Semantics for Answer Set Programming
Marc Denecker, Yuliya Lierler, Mirek Truszczynski and Joost Vennekens.
Lazy model expansion by incremental grounding
Broes De Cat, Marc Denecker and Peter Stuckey.
Logic + control: An example
Wlodek Drabent.
Tabling for infinite probability computation
Taisuke Sato and Philipp Meyer.
Improving Lazy Non-Deterministic Computations by Demand Analysis
Michael Hanus.
Surviving Solver Sensitivity: An ASP Practitioner’s Guide
Bryan Silverthorn, Yuliya Lierler and Marius Schneider.
On the Termination of Logic Programs with Function Symbols
Sergio Greco, Francesca Spezzano and Irina Trubitsyna.
Towards Testing Concurrent Objects in CLP
Elvira Albert, Puri Arenas and Miguel Gomez-Zamalloa.
Generating Event-Sequence Test Cases by Answer SetProgramming with the Incidence Matrix
Mutsunori Banbara, Naoyuki Tamura and Katsumi Inoue.
Answer Set Solving with Lazy Nogood Generation
Christian Drescher and Toby Walsh.
Reconciling Well-Founded Semantics of DL-Programs and AggregatePrograms
Introduction to the 28th ICLP Special Issue
9
Jia-Huai You, John Morris and Yi Bi.
Stable Models of Formulas with Generalized Quantifiers
Joohyung Lee and Yunsong Meng.
Extending C+ with Composite Actions for Robotic Task Planning
Xiaoping Chen, Guoqiang Jin and Fangkai Yang.
Deriving a Fast Inverse of the Generalized Cantor N-tupling Bijection
Paul Tarau.
Unsatisfiability-based optimization in clasp
Benjamin Andres, Benjamin Kaufmann, Oliver Matheis and Torsten
Schaub.
Visualization of Constraint Handling Rules through Source-to-Source Transformation
Slim Abdennadher and Nada Sharaf.
Applying Machine Learning Techniques to ASP Solving
Marco Maratea, Luca Pulina and Francesco Ricca.
Flexible Solvers for Finite Arithmetic Circuits
Nathaniel Filardo and Jason Eisner.
The additional difficulties for the automatic synthesis of specifications posed by
logic features in functional-logic languages
Giovanni Bacci, Marco Comini, Marco A. Feliú and Alicia Villanueva.
Answering Why and How questions with respect to a frame-based knowledge base:
a preliminary report
Shanshan Liang, Nguyen Ha Vo and Chitta Baral.
Logic Programming in Tabular Allegories
Emilio Jesús Gallego Arias and James B. Lipton.
Possibilistic Nested Logic Programs
Juan Carlos Nieves and Helena Lindgren.
Using Answer Set Programming in the Development of Verified Software
Florian Schanda and Martin Brain.
An Answer Set Solver for non-Herbrand Programs: Progress Report
10
A. Dovier and V. Santos Costa
Marcello Balduccini.
CHR for Social Responsibility
Veronica Dahl, Bradley Coleman, Emilio Miralles and Erez Maharshak.
A Concurrent Operational Semantics for Constraint Functional Logic Programming
Rafael Del Vado Vı́rseda, Fernando Pérez Morente and Marcos Miguel
Garcı́a Toledo.
Doctoral Consortium Contributions
Software Model Checking by Program Specialization
Emanuele De Angelis
Temporal Answer Set Programming
Martı́n Diéguez
A Gradual Polymorphic Type System with Subtyping for Prolog
Spyros Hadjichristodoulou
ASP modulo CSP: The clingcon system
Max Ostrowski
An ASP Approach for the Optimal Placement of the Isolation Valves in a Water
Distribution System
Andrea Peano
Answer Set Programming with External Sources
Christoph Redl
Together, Is Anything Possible? A Look at Collective Commitments for Agents
Ben Wright
| 6cs.PL
|
Structural break detection method based on the Adaptive Regression Splines
technique
arXiv:1605.08667v1 [math.ST] 27 May 2016
Daniel Kucharczyk, Agnieszka Wyłomańska
Hugo Steinhaus Center, Department of Mathematics,
Wroclaw University of Technology
Janiszewskiego 14a, 50-370 Wrocław, Poland
[email protected]
[email protected]
Radosław Zimroz
Diagnostics and Vibro-Acoustics Science Laboratory,
Wroclaw University of Technology
Na Grobli 15, 50-421 Wroclaw, Poland
[email protected]
Abstract
For many real data, long term observation consists of different processes that coexist or occur one after the other. Those
processes very often exhibit different statistical properties and thus before the further analysis the observed data should
be segmented. This problem one can find in different applications and therefore new segmentation techniques have
been appeared in the literature during last years. In this paper we propose a new method of time series segmentation,
i.e. extraction from the analysed vector of observations homogeneous parts with similar behaviour. This method
is based on the absolute deviation about the median of the signal and is an extension of the previously proposed
techniques also based on the simple statistics. In this paper we introduce the method of structural break point detection
which is based on the Adaptive Regression Splines technique, one of the form of regression analysis. Moreover we
propose also the statistical test which allows testing hypothesis of behaviour related to different regimes. First, the
methodology we apply to the simulated signals with different distributions in order to show the effectiveness of the
new technique. Next, in the application part we analyse the real data set that represents the vibration signal from a
heavy duty crusher used in a mineral processing plant.
Keywords: segmentation, median, statistical test, structural break point detection
1. Introduction
Physical variables observed/measured by advanced data acquisition systems in real world applications are often processed, modelled, and analysed in order to extract information about the process. In many cases, long term
observation (long might mean very different period depends on application) in fact consists of different processes
that coexist or occur one after the other. There are many examples that during single observation Process A reveals
very different properties than Process B and they cannot be processed/analysed with the same tools (simple example is
switching from stationary to non-stationary signal). Less radical case is that two segments might have the same type of
model, but with different order and values of parameters. It leads to conclusion that very first step in experimental data
analysis is signal segmentation, i.e. dividing the raw observation into smaller pieces (segments) with homogeneous
properties. Note that Process A or Process B might be single process or mixture of processes.
From signal processing perspective, one of the most fundamental reason for segmentation is finding locally stationary segments in non-stationary signals. In such a context the segmentation is a problem of identifying the time
instants at which the statistics of the observed signal changes. Signal segmentation is also generalized and considered
in the context of signal detection and localization by means of recognition and identification of the time of appearance
of event that differs from "normal" signal, [1]. It could be generalized to a model proposed in [1] presented in Fig. 1.
Preprint submitted to Elsevier
May 30, 2016
Figure 1: The model of the signal that is a mixture of different segments related to different processes. Source: [1].
.
The basis (criterion) for signal segmentation might be different in various domains, contexts and applications.
Change of process from Process A to Process B might be related to appearance of seismic event, machine regime
switching, fault in the system, financial crash on stock market, natural radiation, wind behavior, etc. A key issue
is to find proper description of processes in order to highlight the difference between them. In some cases, the
difference between processes is visually identifiable, but often advanced processing is required to find breakpoint.
Signal segmentation might be done in different manners. Some of the methods are based on the statistical properties
of raw time series [2, 3] or its modeling and analysis of model residuals [1, 4, 5]. The second group of segmentation
methods takes under consideration not the raw signal but its transformation to other domain, like spectral [6], cepstral
[7], time-frequency [8–10], etc. In the literature one can also find segmentation techniques based on the raw time
series decomposition such as empirical mode or wavelets decomposition [11–13].
Signal segmentation has been applied in many areas. It is especially crucial in condition monitoring (to isolate
shocks related to damage) [9, 13], machine performance analysis (to find when machine operates under overloading,
idle mode etc) [14], experimental physics [2, 15, 16], biomedical signals (like ECG signals) [7, 17–22], speech analysis
(automatic speech recognition and understanding) [23–25], econometrics [26, 27] and seismic signal segmentation
[8, 28–31]. The other areas where the segmentation problem appears one can find in [32–34].
In this paper we propose a novel segmentation technique. This method is an extension of the algorithm proposed
in [2], where the main statistics used to segmentation was based on the empirical second moment of raw data. An
approach proposed here is a step forward in this field. The introduced method is based on the behaviour of the average
absolute deviation about the empirical median of given time series. For the data where some statistical properties
(expressed mostly by the scale parameter) change over time, the simple statistics applied here changes its behaviour
which leads to structural break detection. The proposed method is much more sensitive for such cases where the
change point is not visually identifiable in the contrast to the method presented in [2]. Moreover it can be used
to different raw signals without assumption of their distributions which is the main advantage. On the one hand
we analyse visually the mentioned statistics but on the other hand the strict method of change point detection is
introduced. The method uses the Adaptive Regression Splines technique which is a form of regression analysis. It is
a non-parametric regression technique and can be seen as an extension of linear systems that automatically models
non-linearities and interactions between variables [35]. Additionally, we propose a statistical test which allows for
testing if given data satisfy the behaviour presented in Fig. 1. Because in the analysis we consider the case where only
one change point exists then the time series {Zi } which is tested here, similar as in [2], can be written in the following
mathematical form
T for i ≤ l,
Xi =
(1)
Y for i > l
where l is a structural break point and T and Y are independent random variables with cumulative distribution functions
G(·) and H(·), respectively.
2
The motivation of our analysis is the time series presented in Fig. 2 where we observe very specific behavior,
similar to this described above. Namely, the visual inspection of the data indicates the statistical properties of raw
signal change and there appears problem of structural break point detection, i.e. how to recognize automatically the
changing point. The data presented in Fig. 2 represent the vibration signal from a heavy duty crusher used in a mineral
processing plant. In the signal we observe that some statistical properties change over time which may be related to
the different modes of operation of the machine. It was proved in many publications related to condition monitoring of
machines, that vibration response significantly depends on external load applied to the machine. In the case of crusher,
load applied to machine means volume of material stream directed to crushing machine. Depends on the volume as
well as structure of material stream (size of stones) statistical properties of vibration will be different. It is practically
very hard to "quantify" properties of material stream. By vibration signal segmentation we can find segments with
homogeneous content that corresponds to "stable" or "stationary" material stream. Let us emphasize, observing the
signal presented in Fig. 2, panel a) it seems that the structural break points are easy detectable here. However if we
analyse separately the subsignals corresponding to number of observations between 60000 and 80000 (see panel b))
and 1600000 and 1640000 (see panel c)) we can conclude that in order to solve the problem of structural break point
detection we have to use advanced statistical methods.
Figure 2: The empirical time series that represents the vibration signal from a heavy duty crusher used in a mineral processing plant (panel a)) and
its subsignals corresponding to number of observations between 60000 and 80000 (panel b)) and 1600000 and 1640000 (panel c)).
.
The rest of the paper is organized as follows: In Section 2 we introduce the methodology related to the new
segmentation technique and compare it to the method presented in [2]. We propose here the visual test based on the
average absolute deviation about the empirical median of given time series as well as the new method of structural
point detection based on the Adaptive Regression Splines technique. Next, we apply the proposed methodology to
the various cases of simulated data with different distributions. We show the efficiency of the introduced method and
their sensitivity for change point detection especially in case where it is not visually identifiable. We indicate the new
technique can be also applied for data with heavy tailed distribution (like Lévy stable) because it is based only on
the empirical median of raw signal which always has finite value. In Section 4 we analyze the real data set presented
in Fig. 2 in the context of structural change point detection. At the end we recognize the distributions of segmented
parts. Last section contains conclusions.
2. Methodology
2.1. Regime testing- a scale based approach
In this part, we introduce a new method of estimating the critical point of scale parameter for time series satisfying
property given in (1). The general idea of the estimation procedure is closely linked to the approach introduced in [2],
briefly described in the next part of this article, namely in Section 2.2. In contrast to [2], our methodology is based on
3
the behavior of the absolute deviation about median defined as follows
Vj =
j
X
Xi − X̃ ,
j = 1, 2, . . . , n,
(2)
i=1
where X̃ is the median of time series X1 , X2 , . . . , Xn . Under the assumption that the underlying sample X1 , X2 , . . . , Xn
satisfies relation (1), we calculate the critical change point l at which shift in the scale parameter occurs. It can be
shown that in this case the estimated value of the statistics (2) takes the following form
V j = β0 + β1 max (0, j − l) + β2 max (0, l − j).
(3)
In the above formulation of the problem the procedure of estimating the critical change point l is equivalent to the
approach presented in [2]. One may easily proof by performing simple algebra that equation (3) can be written as
(
(
a1 + b1 j for j ≤ l
β0 − β1 l + β1 j for j ≤ l
Vj =
=
,
(4)
a2 + b2 j for j > l
β0 + β2 l − β2 j for j > l
where a1 , b1 , a2 , b2 are the coefficients of the linear regressions fitted for two different segments of data separated by
the point l at which shift of the scale parameters occurs.
For the purpose of estimating parameters β0 , β1 , β2 defined in (3) we use a non-parametric regression technique,
called Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines. For the sake of clarity we drop the description of the Multivariate
Adaptive Regression Splines technique and describe it in the subsequent section, namely Section 2.1.1. For the
purpose of testing of the occurrence of change defined in terms of the scale parameters of random variables T and
Y in relation (1), we consider test proposed by [36], where the authors test the hypothesis that G(u) ≡ H(u) against
alternatives of the form G(u) ≡ F(θu) for θ , 1. Following the procedure described in [36], the two samples are
ordered in a single joint array and ranks are assigned from each end of the joint array towards the middle. More
formally, assuming that the two samples corresponding to random variables T and Y from relation (1) consisting of m
and n independent observations are ranked in a combined array represented by
Z = Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zm+n .
(5)
If m + n then the vector of ranks R = {Ri }, i = 1, 2, . . . , m + n is as follows
R = {1, 2, 3 . . . , (m + n)/2, (m + n)/2 . . . , 3, 2, 1},
i = 1, 2, . . . , m + n
(6)
and, if m + n is odd, the ranks are given in the following way
R = {1, 2, 3 . . . , (m + n − 1)/2, (m + n + 1)/2, (m + n − 1)/2, . . . , 3, 2, 1},
i = 1, 2, . . . , m + n.
(7)
Finally, the test statistic W under consideration is defined as the sum of the ranks given in (6) or (7) associated with
sample T . In the testing procedure we use the modified version of the statistics W, namely W ∗ defined as
W − n(n+m+2)
4
for
n+m=2k
r
nm(n
+
m
+
2)(n
+ m − 2)
48(n + m − 1)
∗
, k ∈ Z.
(8)
W =
n(n+m+1)2
W
−
4(n+m)
for n+m=2k+1
s
2
nm(n
+
m
+
1)(3
+
(n
+
m)
)
48(n + m)2
Under the null hypothesis, G(u) ≡ H(u) the limiting distribution (where m tends to ∞) of the statistics W ∗ is characterized by a standard normal distribution N(0, 1). Therefore the corresponding p-value of statistics (8) is calculated
as Φ(W ∗ ), where Φ(x) is defined as a cumulative distributive function of a standard normal distribution. If the p-value
is equal to or smaller than the predefined significance level α we reject the null hypothesis H0 , i.e. the time series
under consideration does not satisfy the relation given in (1), in favor of the alternative hypothesis H1 stating that the
observed time series has at least two regimes with different scale parameters.
4
2.1.1. Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines
Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (MARS) approach is a non-parametric, spline-based regression technique introduced in [35]. Let us consider a set of explanatory variables X = (x1 , x2 , . . . , xn ), a target variable y and N
realizations of the process {yi , x1i , x2i , . . . xni }1N , whereas the true relationship between X and y is given in the form
y = f (x1 , x2 , . . . , xn ) + ǫ,
(9)
where f is an unknown function, and the error term ǫ is a white noise. The general idea of the MARS is to use the
expansions in piecewise linear basis functions of the form (x − t)+ and (t − x)+ , both called hockey stick basis functions
with knot values set to j, where
(
(
x − j, for x > j
j − x, for x < j
(x − j)+ =
and ( j − x)+ =
(10)
0,
otherwise,
0,
otherwise
The general idea of the MARS is to form a set of pairs C consisting of basis functions given in (10) for each input
variable x j with knots at each observed values x ji . Therefore, the set of basis functions is given as
o
n
(11)
C = (x j − t)+ , (t − x j )+ for t ∈ {x j1 , x j2 , . . . , x jN } and j = 1, . . . n
Under Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines approach the set of basis functions defined in (11) is used to construct
the final model as follows
M
X
f (X) = β0 +
βm hm (X),
(12)
m=1
where each hm (X) is a function formed by taking single element from the initial set of basis functions C, or a product
of two or more such elements (functions).
The way of estimating the parameters of the MARS model (12) consists of two stages. At the first stage the MARS
performs a forward stepwise regression procedure by considering at each stage a new basis pair from C including all
possible interaction among explanatory variables and finally adding the pair of basis functions to the final model set
M based on the residual squared error criterion. To make MARS approach computationally less expensive, the level
of interactions among explanatory variables, as well as the maximum number of basis functions in model (12) while
performing the forward stepwise procedure are specified by the user. The forward stepwise regression procedure
always starts by considering the initial model set M consisting only of the constant function h0 (X) = 1. At the end
of this procedure we have a large model of the form (12) that typically overfits the data. The problem of overfitting
the data is resolved by applying a backward stepwise regression procedure in the second step. In this step, the terms
whose removal causes the smallest increase in residual squared error is deleted from the model M at each stage,
producing an estimated best model fˆλ , where λ denotes the number of terms defined in the considered model. The
optimal value of λ is calculated on the basis of the generalized cross-validation criterion defined as
GCV(λ) =
N
P
(yi − fˆλ (X))2
i=1
(1 − M(λ)/N)2
,
(13)
where (1 − M(λ)/N)2 is a penalty factor accounting for the increase variance resulting from a complex model and M(λ)
is the effective number of parameters, including both number of terms in the models and the number of parameters
used for selecting the optimal location of the knots.
2.2. Regime variance testing - a quantile approach
In this subsection we briefly recall the general idea of the regime variance testing presented in [2]. The procedure
is based on the behaviour of the empirical second moment of a given one-dimensional sample X1 , X2 , . . . , Xn . Namely,
the authors consider statistics given in the following form
Cj =
j
X
Xi2 ,
j = 1, 2, . . . , n
i=1
5
(14)
Under the assumption that the random variables T and Y defined in (1) have distributions with finite second moments
σ2T and σ2Y , respectively, the statistics C j has the following property
jσ2T
E(C j ) =
jσ2
Y
for
j≤l
for
j > l.
(15)
If σ2T = σ2Y , then the mean of C j statistics is equal to jσ2T for all j = 1, 2, . . . , n, therefore for independent identically
distributed (i.i.d.) sample, the expected value of the statistics is a linear function with the shift parameter equal to zero.
Similar behaviour of E(C j ) is also observed under the milder assumption that the corresponding random variables T
and Y given in (1) have distributions with infinite second moments.
According to [2], the algorithm of estimating the critical point l for the sample that fulfills relation (1) starts with
dividing for the fixed k = 1, 2, . . . , n the C j statistics into two disjoint sets {C j : j = 1, 2, . . . , k} and {C j : j =
k + 1, k + 2, . . . , n}. Next, the algorithm fits the linear regression lines for the first and the second set, respectively by
minimizing the sum of squared error. Subsequently, the estimator lˆ of the true change point l is defined as the number
k that minimizes the following expression
k
n
X
2 X
2
1
2
lˆ = arg min
C j − y j (k) −
C j − y j (k)
(16)
1≤k≤n
j=1
j=k+1
where y1j (k) and y2j (k) are the values of the linear functions fitted to the data belonging to the appropriate set of points
{C j : j = 1, 2, . . . , k} and {C j : j = k + 1, k + 2, . . . , n}.
In the last step of the procedure, the underlying time series X1 , X2 , . . . , Xn is divided into two vectors W1 = [X12 , X22 , . . . , Xl2 ]
2
2
, . . . , Xn2 ], where quantiles (qα/2 and q1−α/2 ) from the distributions of the squared time series from
, Xl+2
and W2 = [Xl+1
the vector W1 (for that the empirical standard deviation was smaller) are calculated according to the formula
i = 1, 2, . . . , l
(17)
P qα/2 6 Xi2 6 1 − qα/2 = 1 − α,
where α is a given significance level. The above formula is used to construct the H0 hypothesis defined as previously:
observed time series does not satisfy relation (1), whereas the alternative hypothesis H1 is formulated as: observed
time series has at least two regimes of the data for which the appropriate quantiles of the squared time series are different. Under the H0 hypothesis, the appropriate quantiles can be determined on the basis of the empirical cumulative
2
2
, . . . , Xn2 are independent, the statistics B given as
, Xl+2
distribution function. Due to the fact that Xl+1
(18)
B = # qα/2 6 W2 6 1 − qα/2
has a binomial distribution with parameters n − l and p = 1 − α.
2.3. Methodology overview
This section is supposed to describe the main differences between the methodologies described in the foregoing
sections, see Sections 2.1 and 2.2. The main difference comes from the problem of detecting an appropriate change
point at which the shift in the dispersion of a distribution has taken place is tackled by using two different measures
of variability of the distribution. Namely, the average absolute deviations about median and the second moment of a
given sample have been considered. The former is used as a direct measure of scale parameters of a distribution with
cumulative distribution function F satisfying relation
F(x; s, θ) = F(x/s; 1, θ),
(19)
where s is a scale parameter. The latter one is defined in a more systematic way by measuring the variability of
distribution in terms of the empirical variance. As it appears that the graphs of diagnostic statistics presented in (2)
and (14) reveal the same "hockey stick" pattern for time series satisfying relation (1). However the shape of the
function derived based on (2) may contain points at which sudden jump (discontinuity) is observed, influencing the
bias and variance of the true critical point estimator lˆ defined in (16). From the other hand, the resulting graph of
6
the statistics defined in (2) is smoother than in case of diagnostic statistics considered in (14). As a consequence the
obtained results of estimating the true critical point are more reliable comparing to those results obtained based on the
behavior of the empirical second moment taken into consideration in [2]. More details about the performance of the
aforementioned statistics can be found in the successive part of this article, see Section 3. Moreover the behaviour of
both considered statistics, namely V j and C j for exemplary distributions of random variables Z and Y in relation (1) is
presented in Fig. 3.
Figure 3: The C j (red line) and V j (blue line) statistics defined in (14) and (2) for time series driven by a combination of distributions with different
set of parameters where the corresponding critical point l has been planned at middle of the length of sample.
3. Simulations
In this section we describe the results of performed simulations for the methods presented in Section 2 and compare
the robustness of detecting the critical point of the underlying sample satisfying relation (1). The comparison is made
by simulating 1000 trajectories of length n = 1800 of stochastically independent random variables with the scale
parameter change placed on 800th observation. For the purpose of simulations we consider two different set of
scenarios of family of distributions as in [2]. For the first scenario, where the difference between distributions of
random variables T and Y in equation (1) is relatively small, we consider the following cases
• the pure Gaussian case with N(0, 4) and N(0, 4.55) distribution for the first 800 and last 1000 observations,
respectively.
• the pure Lévy-stable case with S(1.9, 0, 2, 0) and S(1.9, 0, 2.5, 0) distribution for the first 800 and last 1000
observations, respectively.
• the pure Lévy-stable case with S(1.8, 0, 2, 0) and S(1.85, 0, 2.5, 0) distribution for the first 800 and last 1000
observations, respectively.
• the pure Lévy-stable-Gaussian case with S(1.8, 0, 1.2, 0) and N(0, 2.45) distribution for the first 800 and last
1000 observations, respectively.
In the second scenario, we consider following parameters of distributions
• the pure Gaussian case with N(0, 2) and N(0, 4) distribution for the first 800 and last 1000 observations, respectively.
7
• the pure Lévy-stable case with S(1.9, 0, 2, 0) and S(1.9, 0, 4, 0) distribution for the first 800 and last 1000 observations, respectively.
• the pure Lévy-stable case with S(1.85, 0, 2, 0) and S(1.95, 0, 4, 0) distribution for the first 800 and last 1000
observations, respectively.
• the pure Gaussian-Lévy-stable case with N(0, 4) and S(1.9, 0, 1, 0) distribution for the first 800 and last 1000
observations, respectively.
Comparing the set of scenarios taken into account in our simulation study with those considered in [2], two additional
test cases have been added in order to test specific behaviour of time series extracted from the real data set presented
in Section 4. Namely, the newly introduced test cases exhibit the behaviour where the shift in the stability parameter
α in conjunction with the change of the scale parameter has taken place.
Figure 4: Comparison of detection procedure for the critical scale change point for two estimators lˆC and lˆV . Panel a) N(0, 4), N(0, 4.55) ,panel b)
S (1.9, 0, 2, 0), S (1.9, 0, 2.5, 0), panel c) S (1.8, 0, 2, 0), S (1.85, 0, 2.5, 0), panel d) S (1.8, 0, 1.2, 0), N(0, 2.45)
In terms of the results for the first scenario under consideration, where all test cases are based on the assumption that
the corresponding critical point is hardly visible are presented in Fig. 4. The obtained results for the aforementioned
scenario show that the estimator lˆV of a true change point l defined in (12) outperforms the corresponding estimator
lˆC (calculated based on (16)) for all considered test cases. The results for the second scenario are presented in Fig. 5,
accordingly. Also in this case we can observe that lˆV estimates the true change point in a more stable way than lˆC . The
superiority of lˆV is particularly pronounced in case of the pure Lévy-stable case with S(1.9, 0, 2, 0) and S(1.9, 0, 4, 0)
distribution, where the dispersion of lˆV is much more smaller than dispersion of lˆC . Apart from comparing the detection
Figure 5: Comparison of detection procedure for the critical scale change point for two estimators lˆ and lˆnew . Panel a) N(0, 2), N(0, 4), panel b)
S (1.9, 0, 2, 0), S (1.9, 0, 4, 0), panel c) S (1.85, 0, 2, 0), S (1.95, 0, 4, 0), panel d) N(0, 4), S (1.9, 0, 1, 0)
procedures for the critical scale change point given above, we also examine the performance of the proposed estimator
8
(2) in conjunction with test statistic by checking the type I error (rejection of H0 hypothesis in case it is true) for 1000
Monte Carlo trajectories of length of 1800 of stochastically independent random variables for the following cases
• Gaussian case with N(0, 2) distribution,
• Lévy-stable case with S(1.8, 0, 1.2, 0) distribution
• Lévy-stable case with S(1.8, 0, 1, 0) and S(1.9, 0, 1, 0) distribution for each half of the sample, randomly permuted.
The results of the conducted simulations are presented in Table 1. For the testing purposes, we apply the sample mean
values of obtained estimators lˆC and lˆV presented in Sections 2.2 and 2.1, respectively. Furthermore we assume that
the corresponding significance level α is set to 0.05. The test based on the C statistics we denote as GS W − C while
the test proposed in this paper as KWZ − V.
Distribution of sample
N(0, 2)
S(1.8, 0, 1.2, 0)
permuted S(1.8, 0, 1, 0), S(1.9, 0, 1, 0)
GSW-C
157
146
168
KWZ-V
45
49
51
Table 1: Numbers of the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis H0 (type I error) based on 1000 Monte Carlo trajectories and the significance
level α = 0.05.
For the three considered cases, we see that the approach proposed in [2] does not preserve the assumed type I error
(α = 0.05), as the corresponding type I errors are equal to 0.157, 0.146 and 0.168. In contrast to [2], the resulting type
I errors for the test statistics described in Section 2.1 are preserved, see KWZ − V column. Moreover, the p-values
corresponding to the acceptance of H0 are much more higher than significance level α = 0.05, see Fig.6. The next
Figure 6: The boxplots of p-values from selected test statistics obtained for different data sets, with the constant scale parameters. Panel a) N(0, 2),
panel b) S (1.8, 0, 1.2, 0), panel c) permuted S(1.8, 0, 1, 0), S(1.9, 0, 1, 0). The corresponding significance level α = 0.05 is shown as red dashed
line.
goal of our simulations study is to exploit the statistical power of the examined test and compare it with the reference
test proposed in [2]. As the power of a given test is strictly connected to type II error β of the test, we focus our attention only on the values of the corresponding type II errors, i.e. numbers of wrongly accepted a false null hypothesis
H0 . For this reason, we consider the first set of scenarios of family of distributions described at the beginning of this
section.
9
Distribution of sample
N(0, 4), N(0, 4.55)
S (1.9, 0, 2, 0), S (1.9, 0, 2.5, 0)
S (1.8, 0, 2, 0), S (1.85, 0, 2.5, 0)
S (1.8, 0, 1.2, 0), N(0, 2.45)
GSW-C
257
219
540
297
KWZ-V
164
0
1
0
Table 2: Numbers of the incorrectly accepted a false null hypothesis H0 (type II error) based on 1000 Monte Carlo trajectories and the significance
level α = 0.05.
0.30
1.0
^
lC
^
lV
0.25
0.05
0.0
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.2
0.10
0.4
0.15
0.20
0.6
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.8
0.30
0.30
d)
0.35
c)
0.35
b)
0.35
a)
^
lC
^
lC
^
lV
^
lV
^
lC
^
lV
Figure 7: The boxplots of p-values for different set of distributions, where initial change point is hardly visible. Panel a) N(0, 4), N(0, 4.55), panel
b) S (1.9, 0, 2, 0), S (1.9, 0, 2.5, 0), panel c) S (1.8, 0, 2, 0), S (1.85, 0, 2.5, 0), panel d) S (1.8, 0, 1.2, 0), N(0, 2.45). The corresponding significance
level α = 0.05 is depicted as red dashed line.
4. Real data analysis
In this section we apply the discussed techniques to the real data set presented in Fig. 2. The data represent the
vibration signal from a heavy duty crusher used in a mineral processing plant. The crusher is a kind of machine which
use a metal surface to crumble materials into small fractional pieces. During this process, as well as during entering
material stream into the crusher, a lot of impacts/shocks appear. They are present in vibration signal acquired from
the bearings housing [37]. In the signal we observe that some statistical properties changes over time. The empirical
analysis is built on top of two different data sets manually extracted from the original time series, see Fig. 2 panel b)
1
2
and panel c). We denote them X11 , X21 , . . . X20000
and X12 , X22 , . . . X40000
, respectively. For both cases, one may easily
observe that change in the scale parameter of the driving distribution has taken place. Therefore we can suspect that
the property given in (1) holds for each of the observed time series. At the first stage of our analysis, we discuss the
results of estimation procedures for critical change points (lˆV and lˆC ) calculated based on V and C statistics formulated
in (2) and (14), respectively. For ease of reading, the results are covered in Table 3. Moreover the obtained estimates
of the critical points lˆC and lˆV along with reference statistics C and V are depicted in Fig. 8.
For the time series consisting of 20000 observations the estimates of the critical change points lˆV and lˆC are 6282
and 7591. The corresponding p-values of the performed statistical tests given in (5) and (18) are 1.15 · 10−25 and
1 allowing us to reach conclusions, where the null hypothesis H0 is rejected in case of the estimate provided by V,
whereas there is not enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis H0 in case of statistics C at the 0.05 significance
level. The similar conclusions are made for the second time series that consists of 40000 observations as the obtained
p-values for lˆV = 14389 and lˆC = 12565 estimates are 3.445 · 10−15 and 1, respectively.
The complementary part of this section is to provide details about potential family of distributions for the sub samples
2
1
into two parts according
and X12 , X22 , . . . X40000
obtained by splitting the original sets of observations X11 , X21 , . . . X20000
to the rule provided by the appropriate estimates of the critical change points lˆV given in Table 3. As a consequence
1
1
1
1
1
the first time series X11 , X21 , . . . X20000
has been divided into X11 , X21 , . . . X6282
and X6283
, X6284
, . . . X20000
, accordingly.
2
2
2
2
2
2
Furthermore two different samples consisting of X1 , X2 , . . . X14389 and X14390 , X14391 , . . . X40000 have been created based
2
. For the purposes of finding appropriate distribution that fits well to the
on the second time series X12 , X22 , . . . X40000
10
1
Figure 8: Two empirical data sets satisfying relation given in (1). Panel a) The empirical time series X11 , X21 , . . . X20000
. Panel b) The empirical time
2
series X12 , X22 , . . . X40000
with the corresponding estimates of the critical changes points lˆV (red dashed line) and lˆC (olive dashed line) obtained by
using approaches described in Sections 2.1 and 2.2
Observations
lˆC
lˆV
Sample I
20 000
Sample II
40 000
7591 (≈ 1)
6282 (< 0.01)
12565 (≈ 1)
14389 (< 0.01)
Table 3: Results of the performed analysis for estimating critical change points lˆC and lˆV . The corresponding p-values are given in parentheses.
empirical data, we follow the procedure where Lévy-stable distribution S(α, β, σ, µ) and Gaussian distribution N(µ, σ)
are considered. In order to fit the parameters of Lévy-stable distribution S(α, β, σ, µ) we apply method described
in [38]. The results of the estimated parameters of Lévy-stable distribution S(α, β, σ, µ) and Gaussian distribution
N(µ, σ) for all samples are presented in Table 4. Moreover Lévy-stable and Gaussian right tail fits on a double
1
2
logarithmic scale for samples X11 , X21 , . . . X20000
and X12 , X22 , . . . X40000
are presented in Fig. 9 and 10, respectively.
Sample
1
X11 , . . . , X6282
1
1
X6283
, . . . , X20000
2
X12 , . . . , X14389
2
2
X14390
, . . . , X40000
Distribution fit
S(α, β, σ, µ)
N(µ, σ)
S(α, β, σ, µ)
N(µ, σ)
S(α, β, σ, µ)
N(µ, σ)
S(α, β, σ, µ)
N(µ, σ)
α
1.8587
β
−0.1110
1.9429
−0.1160
1.8190
−0.0592
1.8814
0.0610
µ
0.0769
0.0789
0.0769
0.0771
0.0577
0.0766
0.0281
0.0797
σ
0.1370
0.2165
0.0887
0.1314
0.0763
0.0951
0.0797
0.0443
KS
0.0097 (0.9274)
0.3448 (< 0.05)
0.0069 (0.8963)
0.4023 (< 0.05)
0.0085 (0.6774)
0.4296 (< 0.05)
0.0064 (0.6761)
0.4801 (< 0.05)
AD
0.6889 (0.5097)
13.0953 (< 0.05)
0.6889 (0.5097)
7.7176 (< 0.05)
0.6889 (0.5097)
∞ (< 0.05)
0.6889 (0.5097)
∞ (< 0.05)
1
Table 4: Estimated parameters of Lévy-stable distribution S(α, β, σ, µ) and Gaussian distribution N(µ, σ) for X11 , X21 , . . . , X20000
and
2
2
2
X1 , X2 , . . . , X40000 samples as well as the KS and AD statistics for Lévy stable distribution and corresponding p-values (presented in brackets).
1
1
1
In terms of the fits to the first empirical data sets X11 , . . . , X6282
and X6283
, . . . , X20000
, we observe that the obtained
estimates of Lévy-stable distribution S(α, β, σ, µ) provide better fits to the data than the corresponding Gaussian
distribution N(µ, σ), see Fig. 9. The observed superiority of the Lévy-stable distribution is pronounced by the fact,
that in both cases the calculated Anderson-Darling and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test statistics [15, 39], force us to reject
the hypothesis that the data is normally distributed in favour of Lévy-stable distribution.
1
To be more precise, for the first vector of observations X11 , . . . , X6282
the values of the Anderson-Darling and Kolmogorov statistics produced by Lévy-stable distribution are 0.6889 and 0.0097, respectively. The corresponding
11
b)
−2
−4
−6
log(1−ECDF(x))
−8
−2
−4
−6
−8
log(1−ECDF(x))
0
a)
Levy−stable
Gaussian
−5
−3
Levy−stable
Gaussian
−1
−5
log(x)
−3
−1
log(x)
1
Figure 9: The right tail fit to the empirical cumulative distribution function for the corresponding sub samples extracted from X11 , X21 , . . . , X20000
1
1
1
given on a double logarithmic scale. Panel a) Empirical sample X11 , . . . , X6282
. Panel b) Empirical sample X6283
, . . . , X20000
. Both panels include
Lévy-Stable (red) and Gaussian (blue) fits to the corresponding empirical cumulative distribution functions produced by the real data (black circles).
p-values are 0.9274 and 0.5097 allowing us to accept the Lévy-stable law a model of the considered set of data. The
values of the test statistics for the Gaussian fit model yield p-values of less than 0.05 forcing us to reject the assumption
that the data is normally distributed at the 0.05 significance level. The similar conclusions are made for the second time
1
1
series X6283
, . . . , X20000
as the obtained values of the tests statistics satisfy the same relationship as in case of the afore1
mentioned sample X11 , . . . , X6282
, see Table 4. Subsequently, we apply the same technique to the second set of empirical
2
2
2
2
2
2
observations, i.e. X1 , X2 , . . . X14389
and X14390
, X14391
, . . . X40000
. It appears that Lévy-stable distributions fit very well
to the both samples, yielding relative small values of the Anderson-Darling (0.6889 and 0.6889) and Kolmogorow2
2
2
2
Smirnov (0.0085 and 0.0064) test statistics for the samples, X12 , X22 , . . . X14389
and X14390
, X14391
, . . . X40000
, respectively.
2
2
2
The associated p-values for the first sample X1 , X2 , . . . X14389 are 0.5097 and 0.6774, whereas for the second sample
2
2
2
X14390
, X14391
, . . . X40000
are equal to 0.5097 and 0.6761, respectively, giving us an opportunity to accept the hypothesis
that both samples are distributed according to the appropriate Lévy-stable law.
b)
−4
−2
0
−3
Levy−stable
Gaussian
−10
Levy−stable
Gaussian
−5
−6
log(1−ECDF(x))
−2
−4
−6
−8
log(1−ECDF(x))
0
a)
−1 0
−5
log(x)
−3
−1
log(x)
2
Figure 10: The right tail fit to the empirical cumulative distribution function for the corresponding sub samples extracted from X12 , X22 , . . . , X40000
2
1
2
given on a double logarithmic scale. Panel a) Empirical sample X12 , . . . , X14389
. Panel b) Empirical sample X14390
, . . . , X40000
. Both panels include
Lévy-Stable (red) and Gaussian (blue) fits to the corresponding empirical cumulative distribution functions produced by the real data (black circles).
The results obtained by fitting the Gaussian model to the both samples force us to reject the hypothesis that the data is
normally distributed as the observed Anderson-Darling and Kolmogorow-Smirnow test produces p-vales of less than
0.05 for all considered cases. The corresponding tail fits of the empirical cumulative distributive function empirical
2
2
2
2
for samples X12 , X22 , . . . X14389
and X14390
, X14391
, . . . X40000
are presented in Fig. 10.
5. Conclusions
In this paper we have introduced a new technique of time series segmentation, i.e extraction from the originally
signal such parts that have similar statistical properties. The proposed technique is based on the simple statistics (absolute deviation about the median) based on given time series. The structural break point detection method proposed
here uses the Adaptive Regression Splines technique, which is an extension of the classical regression. Except the
12
introduction of the estimation procedure for the recognition of the critical point that divides the observed time series
into two regimes, we have also developed the statistical test of testing two-regimes behavior. The universality of the
presented methodology comes from the fact that it does not assume the distribution of the examined time series, therefore, it can be applied to a rich class of real data sets. The theoretical results we have illustrated using the simulated
time series and analysis of real data set that represents the vibration signal from a heavy duty crusher used in a mineral
processing plant.
References
[1] M. Lopatka, C. Laplanche, O. Adam, J.-F. Motsch, J. Zarzycki, Non-stationary time-series segmentation based on the Schur prediction error
analysis, 13th Workshop on Statistical Signal Processing, 251- 256, DOI: 10.1109/SSP.2005.1628601, 2005.
[2] J. Gajda, G. Sikora, A. Wylomanska, Acta Phys. Polon B 44(5), 1015, 2013.
[3] R.S. Tsay, J. Forecasting 7, 1, 1988
[4] R. Makowski, R. Zimroz, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 38, 65, 2013.
[5] R. Makowski, R. Zimroz, Applied Acoustics 77, 130, 2014.
[6] C. Li, M. Liang, T. Wang, Criterion fusion for spectral segmentation and its application to optimal demodulation of bearing vibration signals,
Mechanical Systems Signal Processing http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. ymssp.2015.04.004i, 2015.
[7] C. Bhagavatula, A. Jaech, M. Savvides, V. Bhagavatula, R. Friedman, R. Blue, and M. O. Griofa, Automatic segmentation of cardiosynchronous waveforms using cepstral analysis and continuous wavelet transforms, in Proc. Int. Conf. Image Process., 2045, 2012.
[8] Popescu T.D., Aiordachioaie D., Signal segmentation in time-frequency plane using Renyi entropy - application in seismic signal processing,
Conference on Control and Fault-Tolerant Systems, 2013.
[9] J. Obuchowski, A. Wylomanska, R. Zimroz, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 46, 389, 2014.
[10] J. Urbanek, T. Barszcz, R. Zimroz, J. Antoni, Measurement 45, 1782, 2012.
[11] M. Musaruddin, R. Zivanovic, Signal segmentation of fault records based on empirical mode decomposition, TENCON 2011 - 2011 IEEE
Region 10 Conference, 2011.
[12] H. Azami, S. Sanei, Automated signal segmentation based on singular spectrum analysis and imperialist competitive algorithm, 2012 2nd
International e-Conference on Computer and Knowledge Engineering (ICCKE), 2012.
[13] J. A. Crossman, H. Guo, Y. L. Murphey, J. Cardillo, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 52, 1063 2003.
[14] A. Wylomanska, R. Zimroz, Diagnostyka 15(2), 33, 2014.
[15] K. Burnecki, A. Wylomanska, A. Beletskii, V. Gonchar, A. Chechkin, Phys. Rev. E 85, 056711, 2012.
[16] B. Toth, F. Lillo, and J.D. Farmer, Eur. Phys. J. B 78, 235 2010.
[17] H. Azami, K. Mohammadi, Be. Bozorgtabar, Journal of Signal and Information Processing 3, 39, 2012.
[18] J. Terrien, G. Germain, C. Marque, B. Karlsson, Med Eng Phys. 35(8), 1188, 2013.
[19] R. V. Andreao, B. Dorizzi, J. Boudy, IEEE Trasactions of Biomedical Engineering 53, 8, 2006.
[20] H.J.L.M. Vullings, M.H.G. Verhaegen, H.B. Verbruggen, Automated ECG segmentation with Dynamic Time Warping, Proceedings of the
20th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 20, I998.
[21] P. Mico, M. Mora, D. Cuesta-Frau, M. Aboy, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 98, 118, 2010.
[22] Choi S., Jiang Z., Expert Systems with Applications 34, 1056, 2008.
[23] B. Lovell, B. Boashash, Segmentation of non-stationary signals with applications, Acoustics, CASSP 88, International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (Cat. No.88CH2561-9), 1988.
[24] V. Khanagha, K. Daoudi, O. Pont, H. Yahia, Phonetic segmentation of speech signal using local singularity analysis, Digital Signal Processing
08, DOI: 10.1016/j.dsp.2014.08.002, 2014.
[25] R. Makowski, R. Hossa, International Journal on Applied Mathematics and Computer Science 24, 259, 2014.
[26] J.Janczura, Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, DOI:10.1007/s00186-013-0451-8, 2013.
[27] J.Janczura, R.Weron, AStA - Advances in Statistical Analysis 97, 239, 2013.
[28] C. H. Chen, Geoexploration 23, 35, 1984.
[29] E. Gaby, J., Anderson, R. Kenneth, Geoexploration, 23, 1 1984.
[30] T. D. Popescu, Signal segmentation using changing regression models with application in seismic engineering, Digital Signal Processing 24,
14, 2014.
[31] Pikoulis E-V., Psarakis E.Z., A new authomatic method for seismic signals segmentation, ICASSP 2012
[32] L. R. Padovese, N. Martin, F. Millioz, Journal of Aerospace Engineering 223, 577, 2009.
[33] A. Wylomanska, R. Zimroz, Statistics and Their Applications Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics 122, 469, 2015.
[34] L. A. Sanchez-Perez, L. P. Sanchez-Fernandez, S. Suarez-Guerra, J. J. Carbajal-Hernandez, Expert Systems with Applications 40, 5148,
2013.
[35] H. H. Friedman, The Annals of Statistics 19, 1, 1991.
[36] A. R. Ansari, R. A. Bradley, Ann. Math. Statist. 31, 1174, 1960.
[37] J. Obuchowski, R. Zimroz, A. Wylomanska, Identification of cyclic components in presence of non-Gaussian noise - application to crusher
bearings damage detection, accepted 2015.
[38] I. A. Koutrouvelis, Journal of the American Statistical Association 75, 918, 1980.
[39] P. Cizek, W. Haerdle, R. Weron, Statistical Tools for Finance and Insurance, Springer, 2005.
13
| 10math.ST
|
1
A Comparative Study of Reservoir Computing
for Temporal Signal Processing
arXiv:1401.2224v1 [cs.NE] 10 Jan 2014
Alireza Goudarzi1 , Peter Banda2 , Matthew R. Lakin1 , Christof Teuscher3 , and Darko Stefanovic1
Abstract—Reservoir computing (RC) is a novel approach
to time series prediction using recurrent neural networks.
In RC, an input signal perturbs the intrinsic dynamics of a
medium called a reservoir. A readout layer is then trained
to reconstruct a target output from the reservoir’s state. The
multitude of RC architectures and evaluation metrics poses
a challenge to both practitioners and theorists who study the
task-solving performance and computational power of RC.
In addition, in contrast to traditional computation models,
the reservoir is a dynamical system in which computation
and memory are inseparable, and therefore hard to analyze.
Here, we compare echo state networks (ESN), a popular
RC architecture, with tapped-delay lines (DL) and nonlinear
autoregressive exogenous (NARX) networks, which we use to
model systems with limited computation and limited memory
respectively. We compare the performance of the three systems while computing three common benchmark time series:
Hénon Map, NARMA10, and NARMA20. We find that the
role of the reservoir in the reservoir computing paradigm
goes beyond providing a memory of the past inputs. The DL
and the NARX network have higher memorization capability,
but fall short of the generalization power of the ESN.
Index Terms—Reservoir computing, echo state networks,
nonlinear autoregressive networks, time-delayed networks,
time series computing
I. I NTRODUCTION
Reservoir computing is a recent development in recurrent neural network research with applications to temporal
pattern recognition [1]. RC’s performance in time series
processing tasks and its flexible implementation has made
it an intriguing concept in machine learning and unconventional computing communities [2]–[12]. In this paper,
we functionally compare the performance of reservoir computing with linear and nonlinear autoregressive methods for
temporal signal processing to develop a baseline for understanding memory and information processing in reservoir
computing.
In reservoir computing, a high-dimensional dynamical
core called a reservoir is perturbed with an external input.
The reservoir states are then linearly combined to create
the output. The readout parameters can be calculated by
performing regression on the state of a teacher-driven
reservoir and the expected teacher output. Figure 1 shows a
sample RC architecture. Unlike other forms of neural computation, computation in RC takes place within the transient
1 Department of Computer Science, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA e-mail: [email protected].
2 Department of Computer Science, Portland State University, Portland,
OR 97207, USA.
3 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Portland State
University, Portland, OR 97207, USA.
dynamics of the reservoir. The computational power of the
reservoir is attributed to a short-term memory created by
the reservoir [13] and the ability to preserve the temporal
information from distinct signals over time [14], [15].
Several studies attributed this property to the dynamical
regime of the reservoir and showed it to be optimal when
the system operates in the critical dynamical regime—a
regime in which perturbations to the system’s trajectory
in its phase space neither spread nor die out [15]–[19].
The reason for this observation remains unknown. Maass
et al. [14] proved that given the two properties of separation and approximation, a reservoir system is capable
of approximating any time series. The separation property
ensures that the reservoir perturbations from distinct signals
remain distinguishable whereas the approximation property
ensures that the output layer can approximate any function
of the reservoir states to an arbitrary degree of accuracy.
Jaeger [20] proposed that an ideal reservoir needs to have
the so-called echo state property (ESP), which means that
the reservoir states asymptotically depend on the input and
not the initial state of the reservoir. It has also been suggested that the reservoir dynamics acts like a spatiotemporal
kernel, projecting the input signal onto a high-dimensional
feature space [5], [21]. However, unlike in kernel methods,
the reservoir explicitly computes the feature space.
RC’s robustness to the underlying implementation as
well as its efficient training algorithm makes it a suitable
choice for time series analysis [22]. However, despite more
than a decade of research in RC and many success stories,
its wide-spread adoption is still forthcoming for three main
reasons: first, the lack of theoretical understanding of RC’s
working and its computational power, and second, the
absence of a unifying implementation framework and performance analysis results, and thirdly, missing comparison
with conventional methods.
II. O BJECTIVES
Our main objective is to compare time series computing
in the RC paradigm, in which memory and computation are
integrated, with two basic time series computing methods:
first, a device with perfect memory and no computational
power, ordinary linear regression on tapped-delay line
(DL); and second, a device with limited memory and
arbitrary computational power, a nonlinear autoregressive
exogenous (NARX) neural network. This is a first step toward a systematic investigation of topology, memory, computation, and dynamics in RC. In this article we restrict ourselves to ESNs with a fully connected reservoir and input
2
input signal U(t)
input weights
output weights
Win
Wout
actual output Y(t)
E
reservoir state X(t)
b
target output Y(t)
update old weights
Figure 1. Computation in a reservoir computer. The reservoir is made up of a dynamical neural network with randomly assigned weights. The state
of the nodes are represented by X(t). The input signal U(t) is fed into every reservoir node i with a corresponding weight win
i denoted with weight
res = [wres ], where wres is the weight
column vector Win = [win
i ]. Reservoir nodes are themselves coupled with each other using the weight matrix W
ij
ij
of the connection from node j to node i.
layer. We study the performance of ESN and autoregressive
model on solving three time series problems: computing
the 10th order NARMA time series [23], the 20th order
NARMA time series [24], and the Hénon Map [25]. We also
provide performance results using several variations of the
mean squared error (MSE) and symmetric mean absolute
percentage (SAMP) error to make our results accessible to
the broader neural network and time series analysis research
communities. Our systematic comparison between the ESN
and autoregressive model provides solid evidence that the
reservoir in the ESN performs non-trivial computation and
is not just a memory device.
III. A B RIEF S URVEY OF P REVIOUS W ORK
The first conception of the RC paradigm in the recurrent
neural network (RNN) community was Jaeger’s echo state
network (ESN) [26]. In this early ESN, the reservoir
consisted of N fully interconnected sigmoidal nodes. The
reservoir connectivity was represented by a weight matrix
with elements sampled from a uniform distribution in the
interval [−1, 1]. The weight matrix was then rescaled to
have a spectral radius of λ < 1, a sufficient condition for
ESP.
The input signal was connected to all the reservoir
nodes and their weights were randomly assigned from the
set {−1, 1}. Later, Jaeger [20], [27] proposed that the
sparsity of the connection weight matrix would improve
performance and therefore only 20% of the connections
were assigned weights from the set {−47, 47}.Verstraeten
et al. [28] used a 50% sparse reservoir and a normal distribution for the connection weights, and scaled the weight
matrix posteriori to ensure the ESP; also, only 10% of the
nodes were connected to the input. This study indicated
that, contrary to the earlier report by Jaeger [26], the performance of the reservoir was sensitive to the spectral radius
and showed optimality for λ ≈ 1.1. Venayagamoorthy and
Shishir [29] demonstrated experimentally that the spectral
radius also affects training time, but, they did not study
spectral radii larger than one. Gallicchio and Micheli [30]
provided evidence that the sparsity of the reservoir has a
negligible effect on ESN performance, but depending on the
task, input weight heterogeneity can significantly improve
performance. Büsing et al. [18] reported, from private
communication with Jaeger, that different reservoir structures, such as the scale-free and the small-world topologies,
do not have any significant effect on ESN performance.
Song and Feng [31] demonstrated that in ESNs, with
complex network reservoirs, high average path length and
low clustering coefficient improved the performance. This
finding is at odds with what has been observed in complex
cortical circuits [32] and other studies of ESN [33].
Rodan and Tino [24] studied an ESN model with a very
simple reservoir consisting of nodes that are interconnected
in a cycle with homogeneous input weights and homogeneous reservoir weights, and showed that its performance
can be made arbitrarily close to that of the classical ESN.
This finding addressed for the first time concerns about the
practical use of ESNs in embedded systems due to their
complexity [2]. Massar and Massar [34] formulated a meanfield approximation to the ESN reservoir and demonstrated
that the optimal standard deviation of a normally distributed
weight matrix σw is an inverse power-law of the reservoir
size N with exponent −0.5. However, this optimality is
based on having critical dynamics and not task-solving
performance.
IV. M ODELS
To understand reservoir computation, we compare its
behavior with a system with perfect memory and no computational power and a system with limited memory and
arbitrary computational power.
We choose delay line systems, NARX neural networks,
and echo state networks as described below. We use U(t),
Y (t), and Yb (t) to denote the time-dependent input signals,
the time dependent output signal, and the time-dependent
target signal, respectively.
A. Delay line
A tapped-delay line (DL) is a simple system that allows
us to access a delayed version of a signal. To compare
the computation in a reservoir with the DL, we use a
linear readout layer and connect it to read the states of
3
Wout
Wout
U(t)
Y(t)
b
delay line state X(t)
(a)
U(t)
Wout
Win
Y(t)
b
b
NARX delay line state X(t)
U(t)
Y(t)
b
reservoir state X(t)
(b)
(c)
Figure 2. Architecture of delay line with a linear readout, the NARX neural network, and the ESN.
the DL. Figure 2(a) is a schematic for this architecture.
Note that this architecture is different from the delay line
used in [24] in that the input is only connected to a single
unit in the delay line. The delay units do not perform
any computation. The system is then fed with a teacher
input and the weights are trained using an ordinary linear
regression on the teacher output as follows:
b
Wout = (XT · X)−1 · XT · Y,
(1)
where each row of X represents the state of the DL at a
b are the teacher output
specific time X(t0 ) and the rows of Y
at for the corresponding time Y (t0 ). Note that the DL states
are augmented with a bias unit with a constant value b = 1.
Initially, all the DL states are set to zero.
wout
l,k is the weight of the connection from reservoir node k to
output node l. All the weights are samples of i.i.d. random
variables from a normal distribution with mean µw = 0 and
standard deviation σw . We represent the time-varying input
signal by an Ith order column vector U(t) = [ui (t)], the
reservoir state by an Nth order column vector X(t) = [x j (t)],
and the generated output by an Oth order column vector
Y(t) = [yl (t)]. We compute the time evolution of each
reservoir node in discrete time as:
in
x j (t + 1) = tanh(Wres
j · X(t) + W · U(t)),
where tanh is the nonlinear transfer function of the reservoir
nodes and Wres
is the jth row of the reservoir weight
j
matrix. The reservoir output is then given by:
Y(t) = Wout · X(t).
B. NARX Network
The NARX network is an autoregressive neural network
architecture with a tapped delay input and one or more
hidden layers. Both hidden layers and the output layer are
provided with a bias input with constant value b = 1. We
use tanh as the transfer function for the hidden layer and a
linear transfer function for the output layer. The network is
trained using the Marquardt algorithm [35]. This architecture performs a nonlinear regression on the teacher output
using the previous values of the input accessible through
the tapped delay line. A schematic of this architecture is
given in Figure 2(b). Since we would like to study the
effect of regression complexity on the performance, we fix
the length of the tapped delay to 10 and vary the number
of hidden nodes.
C. Echo State Network
In our ESN, the reservoir consists of a fully connected
network of N nodes extended with a constant bias node
b = 1. The input and the output nodes are connected to all
the reservoir nodes. The input weight matrix is an I × N
matrix Win = [win
i, j ], where I is the number of input nodes
and winj,i is the weight of the connection from input node
i to reservoir node j. The connection weights inside the
reservoir are represented by an N × N matrix Wres = [wres
j,k ],
where wres
is
the
weight
from
node
k
to
node
j
in
the
j,k
reservoir. The output weight matrix is an (N +1(×O matrix
Wout = [wout
l,k ], where O is the number of output nodes and
(2)
(3)
We train the output weights to minimize the squared output
2 given the target output Y(t).
b
b
error E = ||Y(t) − Y(t)||
As with DL, the output weights are calculated using the
ordinary linear regression given in Equation 1.
V. E VALUATION M ETHODOLOGY
The study of task-solving performance and analysis of
computational power in RC is a major challenge because
there are a variety of RC architectures, each with a unique
set of parameters that potentially affect the performance.
The optimal RC parameters are task-dependent and must
be adjusted experimentally. Furthermore, not all studies
use the same tasks and the same performance metrics to
evaluate their results. In addition, in contrast to classical
computation models in which a programmed automaton
acts on a storage device, RC is a dynamical system in which
memory and computing are inseparable parts of a single
phenomenon. In other words, in RC the same dynamical
process that performs computation also retains the memory
of the previous results and inputs. Thus, it is not clear
how much of the RC’s performance can be attributed to
its memory capacity and how much to its computational
power. As a way of approaching this issue, we attempt to
create a functional comparison between the ESN, DL, and
NARX networks.
We choose three temporal tasks for our evaluation: the
Hénon Map, the NARMA 10 time series, and the NARMA
20 time series. These tasks vary in increasing order in their
4
time lag dependencies and the number of terms involved
and thus let us compare the performance of our systems
based on the memory and computational requirements for
task solving. We measure the performance using three
variations of MSE and a SAMP error measure to allow
easy comparison with related work.
A. Tasks
1) Hénon Map Time Series: This time series is generated
by the following system:
2
yt = 1 − 1.4yt−1
+ 0.3yt−2 + zt ,
(4)
where zt is a white noise term with standard deviation
0.001. This is an example of a task that requires limited
computation and memory, and can therefore be used as a
baseline to evaluate ESN performance.
2) NARMA 10 Time Series: Nonlinear autoregressive
moving average (NARMA) is a discrete-time temporal task
with 10th-order time lag. To simplify the notation we use
yt to denote y(t). The NARMA 10 time series is given by:
n
yt = αyt−1 + β yt−1 ∑ yt−i + γut−n ut−1 + δ ,
(5)
i=1
where n = 10, α = 0.3, β = 0.05, γ = 1.5, δ = 0.1. The
input ut is drawn from a uniform distribution in the
interval [0, 0.5]. This task presents a challenging problem
to any computational system because of its nonlinearity
and dependence on long time lags. Calculating the task is
trivial if one has access to a device capable of algorithmic
programming and perfect memory of both the input and the
outputs of up to 10 previous time steps. This task is often
used to evaluate the memory capacity and computational
power of ESN and other recurrent neural networks.
3) NARMA 20 Time Series: NARMA 20 requires twice
the memory and computation compared to NARMA 10
with an additional nonlinearity because of the saturation
function tanh. This task is very unstable and the saturation
function keeps its values bounded. NARMA 20 time series
is given by:
n
yt = tanh(αyt−1 + β yt−1 ∑ yt−i + γut−n ut−1 + δ ),
(6)
i=1
where n = 20, and the rest of the constants are set as in
NARMA 10.
B. Error Calculation
A challenge in comparing results across different studies
is the way each study evaluates its results. In the case of
time series analysis, each study may use a different error
calculation to measure the performance of the presented
methods. We present three different error calculations commonly used in the time series analysis literature. We use
y to refer to the time-dependent output and yb to refer to
the target output. The expectation operator h·i refers to the
time average of its operand.
1) Root normalized mean squared error: The most
commonly used measure is a root normalized mean squared
error (RNMSE) calculated as follows:
s
h(y − yb)2 i
.
(7)
RNMSE =
σybw2
Here σyb2 is the standard deviation of the target output
over time. In some studies this calculation is used without
taking the square root, in which case it is simply called a
normalized mean squared error (NMSE).
2) Normalized root mean squared error: A variant of the
normalized error is the normalized root mean square error
(NRMSE), also known as normalized root mean squared
deviation (NRMSD). It is calculated as follows:
p
h(y − yb)2 i
.
(8)
NRMSE =
max(b
y) − min(b
y)
In this variant, the error is normalized by the width of
the range covered by the target signal. Both RNMSE and
NRMSE attempt to normalize the error between 0 and 1.
However, if the distance between the output and the target
output is larger than the standard deviation of the target
output or its range, they may produce an error value larger
than 1.
3) Symmetric absolute mean percentage error: The
symmetric absolute mean percentage (SAMP) error, on the
other hand, is guaranteed to produce an error value between
0% and 100%. SAMP is given by:
|y − yb|
SAMP = 100 ×
.
(9)
y + yb
Throughout the rest of the paper, we use the RNMSE error to produce the plots and make our comparison between
the three systems. We have tabulated the results using the
other metrics in the Appendix B.
C. Reservoir optimization
Depending on the ESN architecture, its performance can
be sensitive to some of the model’s parameters. These parameters are optimized using offline cross-validation [24],
[36] or online adaptation [19], [37]. This is a preliminary
stage before the functional comparison. We are interested in
the scaling of these parameters, which we study systematically. Figures 3(a)-3(c) shows the resulting error surface
by averaging the result of the 10 runs of each σw -N
combination. We observe that, as the nonlinearity of the
task and its required memory increase, ESN performance
becomes more sensitive to changes in σw and favors a more
heterogeneous weight assignment (larger σw ). We find the
optimal standard deviation σw∗ as a function of N for each
task:
σw∗ (N) = arg min RNMSE(σw , N).
(10)
σw
We found experimentally that σw∗ (N) is best fitted by a
power-law curve. The bottom row of Figure 3 shows the
result of this optimization and the power-law fit. The details
of these fits are provided in Appendix A. For NARMA 10
5
900
700
0.6
700
600
0.5
600
500
0.4
400
0.3
300
0.6
0.5
400
0.4
300
0.3
200
0.2
200
100
0.1
100
0.2
0.8
700
0.7
500
0.9
800
0.8
800
N
N
900
0.7
800
900
1000
0.8
N
1000
600
0.7
500
0.6
400
0.5
300
0.4
200
0.3
100
0.1
0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1
σw
(a) Hénon Map error surface
(b) NARMA 10 error surface
(c) NARMA 20 error surface
0.14
0.14
0.14
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.1
0.1
0.08
σ w∗
0.1
σ w∗
σ w∗
0.2
0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1
σw
0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1
σw
0.08
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.02
0
0
0.08
200
400
600
800
1000
0.02
0
0.02
200
400
N
(d) Hénon Map σw scaling
600
800
1000
N
(e) NARMA 10 σw scaling
0
0
200
400
600
800
1000
N
(f) NARMA 20 σw scaling
Figure 3. Scaling and optimization in the ESN. Figures 3(a), 3(b), and 3(c) show the training error surface of the ESN on the Hénon Map, the NARMA
10, and the NARMA 20 tasks respectively. We create a scaling-law by finding the optimal standard deviation σw∗ (N) according to Equation 10 and
fitting the power-law axb + c to it. Figures 3(d), 3(e), and 3(f) show the data points (blue markers) and the fit (solid line) for the σw∗ (N).
and NARMA 20 the power law is well behaved, except
for the Hénon Map which is not sensitive to σw . We use
σw∗ = 0.02 for Hénon Map experiments. It is noteworthy
that this power-law behavior is qualitatively consistent with
what we expect from the theoretical result in [34], although
the exact power-law coefficient is task-dependent.
on the same task. For ESN, we have two parameters: the
standard deviation of the normal distribution used to create
the weight matrix σw and the number of nodes N in the
reservoir. We chose the σw that optimizes the performance
of ESN for each N as described in Section V-C.
E. Experimental Setup
D. Functional Comparison
The division between memory and computation is not
fully understood. Here, we attempt to compare the ESN
size to the size of an equivalent device with only memory
capacity and no computational power, and to a device with
limited memory and theoretically arbitrary computational
power. A DL of length n stores the perfect memory of the
past n inputs and a NARX network with N hidden units
can be a universal approximator of any time series. We
would like to compare the performance of a linear readout
with access to the reservoir state with a linear readout with
access to the delay line states and also to the performance
of the NARX network. It is clear that the ESN, the DL, and
the NARX network are very different, i.e., the memory and
computational power of ESN, DL, and NARX networks
differ significantly even with identical N. Therefore, we
perform a functional comparison in which we study the
ESN, the DL, and the NARX network with equal RNMSE
In this section we describe the parameters and data sets
used for our simulations. The training and testing for delay
line and NARX networks are done by generating 10 time
series of 4,000 time steps. We used 20 time seres of the
same length for ESNs. We used the first 2,000 time steps
of each time series to train the model and the second
2,000 steps to test the model. The training and testing
performance metrics are then averaged over the 10 runs.
The model specific setting are as follows:
1) Delay line: A delay line is a fixed system with only
one parameter N that defines the number of taps. For this
study we limit ourselves to 1 ≤ N ≤ 2, 000. We have also
experimented with 2, 000 ≤ N ≤ 3, 000, but the performance
of the delay line does not change for N > 2, 000. We take
N = 2, 000 as the largest delay line for this study.
2) NARX neural network: Since the training in the
NARX network is sensitive to the random initial weights,
we instantiate a new network for each time series. We fix
6
1
0.8
1
Delay line
NARX NN
ESN
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.4
RNMSE
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0
0
500
1000
1500
Normalized size
0
0
2000
(a) Hénon Map training
5
5
5
RNMSE
0
0
10
−5
0
10
−5
500
1000 1500
Normalized size
2000
(d) Hénon Map generalization
Delay line
NARX NN
ESN
10
RNMSE
RNMSE
0
2000
10
10
Delay line
NARX NN
ESN
10
10
500
1000
1500
Normalized size
(c) NARMA 20 training
10
10
Delay line
NARX NN
ESN
10
10
0
0
2000
(b) NARMA 10 training
10
10
500
1000
1500
Normalized size
Delay line
NARX NN
ESN
0.9
0.7
RNMSE
RNMSE
1
Delay line
NARX NN
ESN
0.9
10
0
−5
500
1000 1500
Normalized size
(e) NARMA 10 generalization
2000
10
0
500
1000 1500
Normalized size
2000
(f) NARMA 20 generalization
Figure 4. Training and generalization RNMSE of the DL, the NARX network, and the ESN for three different tasks. The DL can memorize the
patterns, but not generalize for any of the tasks. The NARX network can generalize for the Hénon Map, but overfits for the NARMA 10 and the
NARMA 20. The ESN can both memorize and generalize the temporal patterns for all the tasks.
the number of input taps to 10 and the number of hidden
layers to 1. We use the number of nodes in the hidden layer
N as the control parameter, with 1 ≤ N ≤ 100.
3) Echo state network: A single instantiation of ESN
contains randomly assigned weights and the reservoir initial
states. To average the ESN properties over these variations
we instantiate five ESN to train and test for every time
series. The error is then averaged over the five instances
and then over 20 time series. The variable parameters for
ESN are the number of reservoir nodes N and the standard
deviation of the normal distribution used to generate the
reservoir and the input weights. However, for each N we
only use the σw∗ as described in Section V-C. We study the
ESN with the reservoir size 10 ≤ N ≤ 1, 000.
VI. R ESULTS
Figures 4(a)-4(c) show the training performance measured in RNMSE as a function of the normalized system
size. In all three tasks, the delay line shows a sharp decrease
in error as soon as the system acquires enough capacity
to hold all the required information for the task. This is
N = 2 for Hénon Map, N = 10 for NARMA 10 task, and
N = 20 for NARMA 20 task. After this point, the error
decreases slowly until N = 2, 000 where RNMSE ≈ 0.14
after a sharp drop. The decrease in error is due to the
“dimensionality curse”: the fixed-length teacher time series
are not representatives of the expanded state space of the
delay line. This is expected to result in overfitting, which
is reflected in the high testing errors on Figures 4(d)-4(f).
Another expected behavior of overfitting to training data is
that if the distribution of the data is wide, the error will be
larger and for narrower distributions of data the error will
be lower. This is why the delay line has the highest error
for the simplest task, the Hénon Map, and the lowest error
for the most difficult task, the NARMA 20 task. Note that
to make the testing errors for all the system readable, we
use logarithmic y-axes.
The NARX network behaves differently on the Hénon
Map and the two NARMA tasks. For the Hénon Map, it
shows the best training and testing performance around N =
5 and begins to overfits for N > 5. For both NARMA 10
and NARMA 20, the training error decreases gradually as
the number of hidden nodes increases, but the system only
memorizes the patterns and cannot generalize, which is
characterized by increasing test RNMSE. For the NARMA
10 task, the observed training RNMSE for NARX network
is comparable to the error of 0.17 reported by Atiya and
Parlos [23] for the same network size N = 40. However,
they used only 200 data points, which explains the slightly
lower error. Atiya and Parlos focused on the convergence
7
Next, we compared the performance of the DL, the
NARX network, and the ESN as described in Section V-D.
Because the testing error of the systems do not overlap, we
have to use the training error to perform a direct functional
comparison between the three systems. This allows us to
compare their memorization capabilities. Figure 5(a) shows
the DL size as a function of the ESN size of identical
training error for all three tasks. For the Hénon Map and the
NARMA 10 tasks, the ESN achieves the same RNMSE as
the delay line with significantly fewer nodes. For instance
for the Hénon Map and NARMA 10, to achieve a training
RNMSE of an ESN with 400 nodes, a delay line would
need 1, 990 and 1, 810 nodes respectively. For NARMA
20, the delay line only needs 90 nodes to achieve the
same RNMSE as an ESN with 400 nodes. The narrow
distribution of the NARMA 20 time series allow the linear
delay line to exploit the average case strategy to achieve
a lower RNMSE. On the other hand, the ESN readout
layer learns the task itself as in contrast to just memorizing
patterns. The delay line use the same strategy for the easier
tasks as well (NARMA 10 and Hénon Map), but ESN can
fit to the the training data much better than the delay line
and therefore requires much less resources to achieve the
same error level.
Figure 5(b) shows the functional comparison result between NARX networks and ESNs. A NARX network would
need 10 hidden nodes to achieve the same RNMSE as a
400-node ESN on the Hénon Map task. The short time
dependency and the simple form of this task make it very
easy for the network to learn the system, which results
in low training and testing RNMSE. For the NARMA
10 and the NARMA 20 tasks, the network requires 60
and 50 hidden nodes to be equivalent of the 400-node
ESN. The strategy here is similar to the delay line where
during learning the network tries to fit the training data on
average, as best as it can. As expected this strategy will
have two consequences: (1) the NARMA 20 task will be
easier because of its distribution; (2) the network overfits
the training data and cannot generalize to testing data.
The reservoir in an ESN is a dynamical system in which
memory and computation are inseparable. To understand
this type of information processing we compared the ESN
performance with a memory-only device, the DL, and a
limited-memory but computationally powerful device, the
NARX network. Our results illustrate that the performance
of ESN is not only due to its memory capacity; ESN readout does not create an autoregression of the input, such as in
the DL or the NARX network. The information processing
that takes place inside a reservoir is fundamentally different
from other types of neural networks. The exact mechanism of this process remains to be investigated. Studying
reservoir computing usually takes place by analyzing the
systems performance for task solving with different com-
2000
1500
Delay line size
For the ESN, the training error on all three tasks decreases rapidly as the size of the reservoir increases and
reaches a plateau for N ≈ 1, 000. However, unlike the DL
and the NARX network, the testing error also decreases
sharply as the reservoir size increases. As expected, this
decrease is sharper for easier tasks. The main different of
the ESN performance is that the training error increases
across all N as the difficulty of the task increases, which is
a sign that the readout layer is not merely memorizing the
training patterns. We have tabulated the error values for all
three systems on all the tasks for a few system sizes, which
can be found in the Appendix B. Our ESN testing results
are similar to those reported by Rodan and Tino [24] for
the same system size.
VII. D ISCUSSION AND O PEN P ROBLEMS
y=x
Henon Map
Narma 10
Narma 20
1000
500
0
200 400 600 800 1000
ESN reservoir size
(a) DL vs. ESN
100
NARX NN hidden layer size
times of different algorithms and did not publish their
testing error.
80
60
40
20
0
y=x
Henon Map
Narma 10
Narma 20
200 400 600 800
ESN reservoir size
1000
(b) NARX NN vs. ESN
Figure 5. Figure 5(a) shows how the complexity of the DL compares with
the ESN of identical memorization performance. Except for the NARMA
20, which requires perfect memory of the 20 previous time steps, the ESN
memorization capability far surpasses the DL. Figure 5(b) shows the same
comparison between the NARX and the ESN. The NARX network out
performs the ESN in all tasks. Due its complexity, the NARX network
can memorize the patterns very well, but is not able to generalize to the
new patterns (see Figure 4).
8
putational and memory requirements. To understand the
details of information processing in a reservoir, we have
to understand the effects of the reservoir’s architecture
on its fundamental memory and computational capacity.
We also have to be able to define the classes of tasks
that can be parametrically varied in memory requirement
and nonlinearity. Our study reveals that although ESN
cannot memorize patterns as well as a memory device or a
neural network, it greatly outperforms them in generalizing
to novel inputs. Also, increasing reservoir size in ESN
improves the performance of generalization, whereas in the
DL or the NARX network this will result in increased overfitting leading to poorer generalization. One solution would
be to extend the receiver operation characteristic (ROC)
and receiver error characteristic (REC) curve methods to
decide on the quality of generalization in ESN [38]–[40]. In
the neural network community, methods based on pruning,
regularization, cross-validation, and information criterion
have been used to alleviate the overfitting problem [41]–
[53]. Among these methods, regularization has been successfully used in ESNs [3]. However, these methods focus
on increasing the neural network’s performance and are not
suitable to quantify overfitting or to study task hardness.
Another area that requires more research is the amount
of training that the ESN requires to guarantee a certain
performance, as is described in probably approximately
correct methods [54]–[56]. To the best of our knowledge
these problems have not been addressed in the case of highdimensional dynamical systems. A well developed theory
of computation in reservoir computing needs to address all
of these aspects. In future work, we will study some of
these issues experimentally and based on our observations,
we will attempt to develop theoretical understanding of
computation in the reservoir computing paradigm.
VIII. C ONCLUSION
Reservoir computing is an approach to neural network
training which has been successful in areas of machine
learning, time series analysis, robot control, and sequence
learning. There has been many studies aimed at understanding the working of RC and the factors that affect its
performance. However, because of the complexity of the
reservoir in RC, none of these studies have been completely
satisfactory and have often resulted in contradictory conclusions. In this paper, we compared the performance of
three approaches to time series analysis: the delay line,
the NARX network, and the ESN. These methods vary
in their memory capacity and computational power. The
delay line retains a perfect memory of the past, but does
not have any computational power. The NARX network
only has limited memory of the past, but in principle
can perform any computation. Finally, the ESN does not
have an explicit access to past memory, but its reservoir
carries out computation using the implicit memory of
the past represented in its dynamics. Using a functional
comparison we showed that for simple tasks with short
time dependencies, the delay line requires more than four
times as much resources that ESN requires to achieve the
same error, while the NARX network requires 40 times
less resources than ESN to achieve equivalent error. For
tasks with long time dependencies and narrow distributions
the delay line requires less than one fourth the resources
of the ESN and the NARX network requires less then
one fifth the same resources. However, neither a delay
line nor a NARX network can achieve the generalization
power of an ESN. Many theoretical aspects of reservoir
computing, such as the memory-computation trade-off, and
the relation between reservoir’s structure, its dynamics, and
its performance remain as open problems.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The work was support by NSF grants #1028238 and
#1028120. M.R.L. gratefully acknowledges support from
the New Mexico Cancer Nanoscience and Microsystems
Training Center.
A PPENDIX A
F ITTING σw
Before we can fit σw∗ , we have to interpolate the data
points on the error surface with a linear fit. This allows
us to use all values of N and σw and create a smooth fit.
Table I shows the goodness of fit statistics for the linear
fit to the error surface. Low SSE and high R2 statistics
on this fit shows the the surface accurately represent the
data points. We then calculate the σw∗ corresponding to the
task
Hénon Map
NARMA 10
NARMA 20
SSE
1.5486 × 10−31
2.989 × 10−31
7.3725 × 10−31
Table I
R2
1
1
1
G OODNESS OF FIT STATISTICS FOR THE INTERPOLANT FIT TO THE
ERROR SURFACE (F IGURE 3) AS A FUNCTION OF RESERVOIR σw AND
FOR ALL THREE TASKS .
N
standard deviation of the weight matrix for each N that
minimizes the error. We represent σw∗ as a function of N
and fit the power-law axb + c to it. The result of the fit and
the goodness of fit statistics are given in Table II.
A PPENDIX B
T HE P ERFORMANCE R ESULTS
Tables III, IV, and V tabulate the average testing and
training errors of optimal ESNs, delay lines, and NARX
networks for the three different tasks using three different
measures, i.e., RNMSE, NRMSE, and SAMP.
R EFERENCES
[1] B. Schrauwen, D. Verstraeten, and J. V. Campenhout, “An overview
of reservoir computing: theory, applications and implementations,”
in Proceedings of the 15th European Symposium on Artificial Neural
Networks, 2007, pp. 471–482.
[2] D. Prokhorov, “Echo state networks: appeal and challenges,” in
Neural Networks, 2005. IJCNN ’05. Proceedings. 2005 IEEE International Joint Conference on, vol. 3, 2005, pp. 1463–1466 vol.
3.
9
task
Hénon Map
task
NARMA 10
task
NARMA 20
measure
training
RNMSE
testing
training
NRMSE
testing
training
SAMP
testing
N = 50, σw∗ = 0.02
0.2474 ± 0.0215
0.3805 ± 0.0738
0.0696 ± 0.0060
0.1071 ± 0.0208
16.2797 ± 1.1912
16.6023 ± 1.2046
N = 100, σw∗ = 0.02
0.0385 ± 0.0039
0.1053 ± 0.0225
0.0109 ± 0.0011
0.0296 ± 0.0063
3.0074 ± 0.3899
3.2470 ± 0.4199
N = 150, σw∗ = 0.02
0.0247 ± 0.0008
0.0448 ± 0.0061
0.0069 ± 0.0002
0.0126 ± 0.0017
1.2687 ± 0.1440
1.4182 ± 0.1577
N = 200, σw∗ = 0.02
0.0230 ± 0.0002
0.0359 ± 0.0048
0.0065 ± 0.0000
0.0101 ± 0.0014
0.8498 ± 0.0584
0.9797 ± 0.0672
N = 500, σw∗ = 0.02
0.0226 ± 0.0001
0.0264 ± 0.0026
0.0063 ± 0.0000
0.0074 ± 0.0007
0.6821 ± 0.0373
0.9441 ± 0.0527
measure
training
RNMSE
testing
training
NRMSE
testing
training
SAMP
testing
N = 50, σw∗ = 0.10
0.3896 ± 0.0073
0.4035 ± 0.0070
0.0635 ± 0.0012
0.0653 ± 0.0011
4.6137 ± 0.0819
4.7961 ± 0.0862
N = 100, σw∗ = 0.07
0.3036 ± 0.0104
0.3270 ± 0.0113
0.0495 ± 0.0017
0.0529 ± 0.0018
3.5742 ± 0.1343
3.8297 ± 0.1467
N = 150, σw∗ = 0.05
0.2300 ± 0.0058
0.2560 ± 0.0064
0.0374 ± 0.0010
0.0414 ± 0.0011
2.6224 ± 0.0742
2.8827 ± 0.0881
N = 200, σw∗ = 0.05
0.1904 ± 0.0051
0.2199 ± 0.0054
0.0309 ± 0.0008
0.0355 ± 0.0009
2.1247 ± 0.0642
2.4024 ± 0.0719
N = 500, σw∗ = 0.04
0.1248 ± 0.0056
0.1796 ± 0.0078
0.0202 ± 0.0009
0.0291 ± 0.0013
1.4310 ± 0.0654
1.9710 ± 0.0900
measure
training
RNMSE
testing
training
NRMSE
testing
training
SAMP
testing
N = 50, σw∗ = 0.10
0.7846 ± 0.0246
0.8003 ± 0.0257
0.0985 ± 0.0031
0.1012 ± 0.0032
2.9507 ± 0.0776
3.0570 ± 0.0830
N = 100, σw∗ = 0.09
0.5313 ± 0.0510
0.5746 ± 0.0499
0.0667 ± 0.0065
0.0728 ± 0.0062
2.1860 ± 0.1922
2.3736 ± 0.1874
N = 150, σw∗ = 0.08
0.4478 ± 0.0650
8.6177 ± 24.2443
0.0562 ± 0.0082
1.0662 ± 2.9647
1.9531 ± 0.2518
6.0811 ± 7.7539
N = 200, σw∗ = 0.07
0.4171 ± 0.0621
5.7683 ± 13.0557
0.0524 ± 0.0078
0.7260 ± 1.6434
1.8459 ± 0.2461
5.3690 ± 7.2349
N = 500, σw∗ = 0.04
0.2776 ± 0.0183
0.3873 ± 0.0222
0.0349 ± 0.0023
0.0491 ± 0.0028
1.3097 ± 0.0807
1.8134 ± 0.0965
Table III
T RAINING AND TESTING ERRORS FOR THE OPTIMAL ESN ON THREE DIFFERENT TASKS MEASURED USING THREE DIFFERENT ERROR METRICS
∗
RNMSE, NRMSE, AND SAMP. T HE OPTIMAL σw IS MEASURED USING THE RNMSE ON THE TRAINING DATA . E ACH DATA POINT IS AVERAGED
OVER 100 EXPERIMENTS .
task
measure
training
testing
training
NRMSE
testing
training
SAMP
testing
N = 100
0.8726 ± 0.0044
0.9164 ± 0.0051
0.2452 ± 0.0011
0.2581 ± 0.0017
56.0839 ± 0.3592
57.8635 ± 0.3953
N = 200
0.8478 ± 0.0038
0.9378 ± 0.0037
0.2382 ± 0.0009
0.2636 ± 0.0017
54.1909 ± 0.3698
58.3511 ± 0.2825
N = 500
0.7848 ± 0.0049
1.0243 ± 0.0120
0.2208 ± 0.0018
0.2886 ± 0.0037
50.1493 ± 0.3639
59.4723 ± 0.5885
N = 1000
0.6764 ± 0.0060
1.2294 ± 0.0183
0.1901 ± 0.0011
0.3463 ± 0.0046
42.7874 ± 0.4785
60.9760 ± 0.5650
N = 2000
0.1426 ± 0.0066
13305472391.5757 ± 9380091076.0147
0.0402 ± 0.0018
3748747654.4792 ± 2646155454.1636
2.5302 ± 0.1497
95.2081 ± 0.4781
measure
training
testing
training
NRMSE
testing
training
SAMP
testing
N = 100
0.3972 ± 0.0188
2.9150 ± 0.1827
0.0650 ± 0.0021
0.4642 ± 0.0360
4.6786 ± 0.1660
27.5133 ± 1.0130
N = 200
0.3884 ± 0.0193
2.9088 ± 0.1852
0.0635 ± 0.0020
0.4633 ± 0.0363
4.5824 ± 0.1747
27.4396 ± 1.0251
N = 500
0.3590 ± 0.0224
2.8797 ± 0.1919
0.0586 ± 0.0021
0.4586 ± 0.0370
4.2474 ± 0.1970
27.2029 ± 1.0782
N = 1000
0.3017 ± 0.0230
2.8063 ± 0.2152
0.0493 ± 0.0025
0.4468 ± 0.0401
3.5989 ± 0.2575
26.5114 ± 1.2347
N = 2000
0.0497 ± 0.0072
1007103272.9273 ± 482045875.2627
0.0082 ± 0.0013
164091125.1086 ± 83497086.3948
0.1873 ± 0.0222
100.0000 ± 0.0000
measure
training
RNMSE
testing
training
NRMSE
testing
training
SAMP
testing
N = 100
0.2620 ± 0.0093
13.5807 ± 0.7275
0.0333 ± 0.0020
1.7237 ± 0.0382
1.3211 ± 0.0855
43.8473 ± 0.5246
N = 200
0.2289 ± 0.0068
13.6650 ± 0.7321
0.0290 ± 0.0014
1.7346 ± 0.0402
1.1533 ± 0.0600
44.0038 ± 0.5579
N = 500
0.2132 ± 0.0066
13.7338 ± 0.7514
0.0271 ± 0.0014
1.7433 ± 0.0429
1.0761 ± 0.0615
44.1198 ± 0.5911
N = 1000
0.1804 ± 0.0091
13.9180 ± 0.7712
0.0229 ± 0.0017
1.7667 ± 0.0457
0.8980 ± 0.0743
44.4313 ± 0.6170
N = 2000
0.0450 ± 0.0061
1234560367.6547 ± 811645432.8192
0.0057 ± 0.0007
160391618.4866 ± 109709916.7516
0.1113 ± 0.0132
100.0000 ± 0.0000
RNMSE
Hénon Map
task
RNMSE
NARMA 10
task
NARMA 20
Table IV
T RAINING AND TESTING ERRORS FOR THE DELAY LINE RESERVOIR ON THREE DIFFERENT TASKS MEASURED USING THREE DIFFERENT ERROR
METRICS RNMSE, NRMSE, AND SAMP. E ACH DATA POINT IS AVERAGED OVER 10 EXPERIMENTS .
task
measure
training
testing
training
NRMSE
testing
training
SAMP
testing
N=5
0.0014 ± 0.0000
0.0014 ± 0.0000
0.0004 ± 0.0000
0.0004 ± 0.0000
0.1900 ± 0.0304
0.2091 ± 0.0293
N = 10
0.0013 ± 0.0000
0.0015 ± 0.0000
0.0004 ± 0.0000
0.0004 ± 0.0000
0.1692 ± 0.0292
0.1914 ± 0.0218
N = 30
0.0012 ± 0.0000
0.0016 ± 0.0000
0.0003 ± 0.0000
0.0005 ± 0.0000
0.1674 ± 0.0293
0.2110 ± 0.0294
N = 50
0.0011 ± 0.0000
0.0019 ± 0.0001
0.0003 ± 0.0000
0.0005 ± 0.0000
0.1455 ± 0.0140
0.2323 ± 0.0354
N = 100
0.0009 ± 0.0000
0.0037 ± 0.0008
0.0003 ± 0.0000
0.0010 ± 0.0002
0.1098 ± 0.0142
0.3263 ± 0.0335
training
testing
training
testing
training
testing
0.9081 ± 0.0072
1.0894 ± 0.0074
0.2617 ± 0.0018
0.3156 ± 0.0030
26.2977 ± 0.3168
30.4646 ± 0.4856
0.8235 ± 0.0091
1.1627 ± 0.0121
0.2373 ± 0.0028
0.3368 ± 0.0048
24.2035 ± 0.3464
31.9513 ± 0.5791
0.5010 ± 0.0094
1.5363 ± 0.0233
0.1444 ± 0.0026
0.4451 ± 0.0080
17.0853 ± 0.2634
40.4312 ± 0.8923
0.2450 ± 0.0100
1.9322 ± 0.0330
0.0706 ± 0.0028
0.5598 ± 0.0110
10.3269 ± 0.4612
47.1503 ± 0.6935
0.0000 ± 0.0000
2.5015 ± 0.0755
0.0000 ± 0.0000
0.7246 ± 0.0227
0.0000 ± 0.0000
52.7679 ± 1.0017
training
testing
training
testing
training
testing
0.9276 ± 0.0046
1.2201 ± 0.2734
0.2673 ± 0.0015
0.3538 ± 0.0806
26.6541 ± 0.2840
30.4213 ± 0.6264
0.8468 ± 0.0063
1.4458 ± 0.5060
0.2441 ± 0.0022
0.4189 ± 0.1466
24.7928 ± 0.2442
31.9725 ± 0.7206
0.5279 ± 0.0100
1.5594 ± 0.0238
0.1521 ± 0.0030
0.4517 ± 0.0077
17.6939 ± 0.2953
40.2941 ± 0.7937
0.2725 ± 0.0084
2.0689 ± 0.0580
0.0785 ± 0.0026
0.5994 ± 0.0186
11.0069 ± 0.4056
47.8871 ± 0.8487
0.0000 ± 0.0000
2.8666 ± 0.0921
0.0000 ± 0.0000
0.8307 ± 0.0310
0.0000 ± 0.0000
54.5926 ± 1.1815
RNMSE
Hénon Map
RNMSE
NARMA 10
NRMSE
SAMP
RNMSE
NARMA 20
NRMSE
SAMP
Table V
T RAINING AND TESTING ERRORS FOR THE NARX NETWORK ON THREE DIFFERENT TASKS MEASURED USING THREE DIFFERENT ERROR METRICS
RNMSE, NRMSE, AND SAMP. E ACH DATA POINT IS AVERAGED OVER 10 EXPERIMENTS .
[3] F. Wyffels and B. Schrauwen, “A comparative study of reservoir
computing strategies for monthly time series prediction,” Neurocomputing, vol. 73, no. 10–12, pp. 1958–1964, 2010.
[4] H. Jaeger, “Adaptive nonlinear system identification with echo state
networks,” in NIPS, 2002, pp. 593–600.
[5] M. Lukoševičius and H. Jaeger, “Reservoir computing approaches to
10
Hénon Map
0.0011
0.5670
−5.733 × 10−8 ± 2.9430 × 10−7
1.795 ± 0.7450
0.02053 ± 0.0016
NARMA 10
SSE
2.9686 × 10−4
R2
0.9926
a
0.306 ± 0.0095
b
−0.2609 ± 0.0249
c
−0.02537 ± 0.0079
NARMA 20
SSE
5.8581 × 10−4
R2
0.9909
a
−0.03441 ± 0.0143
b
0.2156 ± 0.0408
c
0.1766 ± 0.0210
Table II
G OODNESS OF FIT STATISTICS FOR THE POWER - LAW FIT axb + c TO σw∗
(F IGURE 3) AS A FUNCTION OF RESERVOIR SIZE N FOR ALL THREE
TASKS .
SSE
R2
a
b
c
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
recurrent neural network training,” Computer Science Review, vol. 3,
no. 3, pp. 127–149, 2009.
H. O. Sillin, R. Aguilera, H.-H. Shieh, A. V. Avizienis, M. Aono,
A. Z. Stieg, and J. K. Gimzewski, “A theoretical and experimental
study of neuromorphic atomic switch networks for reservoir computing,” Nanotechnology, vol. 24, no. 38, p. 384004, 2013.
M. Fiers, B. Maes, and P. Bienstman, “Dynamics of coupled cavities
for optical reservoir computing,” in Proceedings of the 2009 Annual Symposium of the IEEE Photonics Benelux Chapter, S. Beri,
P. Tassin, G. Craggs, X. Leijtens, and J. Danckaert, Eds. VUB
Press, 2009, pp. 129–132.
G. Indiveri, B. Linares-Barranco, R. Legenstein, G. Deligeorgis, and
T. Prodromakis, “Integration of nanoscale memristor synapses in
neuromorphic computing architectures,” Nanotechnology, vol. 24,
no. 38, p. 384010, 2013.
O. Obst, A. Trinchi, S. G. Hardin, M. Chadwick, I. Cole, T. H.
Muster, N. Hoschke, D. Ostry, D. Price, K. N. Pham, and T. Wark,
“Nano-scale reservoir computing,” Nano Communication Networks,
vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 189–196, 2013.
Y. Paquot, F. Duport, A. Smerieri, J. Dambre, B. Schrauwen,
M. Haelterman, and S. Massar, “Optoelectronic reservoir computing,” Scientific Reports, vol. 2, 02 2012.
C. Fernando and S. Sojakka, “Pattern recognition in a bucket,” in
Advances in Artificial Life, ser. Lecture Notes in Computer Science,
W. Banzhaf, J. Ziegler, T. Christaller, P. Dittrich, and J. Kim, Eds.
Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2003, vol. 2801, pp. 588–597.
A. Goudarzi, M. R. Lakin, and D. Stefanovic, “DNA reservoir
computing: A novel molecular computing approach,” in DNA Computing and Molecular Programming, ser. Lecture Notes in Computer
Science, D. Soloveichik and B. Yurke, Eds. Springer International
Publishing, 2013, vol. 8141, pp. 76–89.
H. Jaeger and H. Haas, “Harnessing nonlinearity: Predicting chaotic
systems and saving energy in wireless communication,” Science, vol.
304, no. 5667, pp. 78–80, 2004.
W. Maass, T. Natschläger, and H. Markram, “Real-time computing
without stable states: a new framework for neural computation based
on perturbations,” Neural Computation, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 2531–60,
2002.
T. Natschläger and W. Maass, “Information dynamics and emergent
computation in recurrent circuits of spiking neurons,” in Proc. of
NIPS 2003, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems,
S. Thrun, L. Saul, and B. Schoelkpf, Eds., vol. 16. Cambridge:
MIT Press, 2004, pp. 1255–1262.
N. Bertschinger and T. Natschläger, “Real-time computation at the
edge of chaos in recurrent neural networks,” Neural Computation,
vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 1413–1436, 2004.
D. Snyder, A. Goudarzi, and C. Teuscher, “Computational capabilities of random automata networks for reservoir computing,” Phys.
Rev. E, vol. 87, p. 042808, Apr 2013.
[18] L. Büsing, B. Schrauwen, and R. Legenstein, “Connectivity, dynamics, and memory in reservoir computing with binary and analog
neurons.” Neural Computation, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 1272–1311, 2010.
[19] J. Boedecker, O. Obst, N. M. Mayer, and M. Asada, “Initialization
and self-organized optimization of recurrent neural network connectivity,” HFSP Journal, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 340–349, 2009.
[20] H. Jaeger, “Tutorial on training recurrent neural networks, covering
BPPT, RTRL, EKF and the “ echo state network” approach,” German
National Research Center for Information Technology, St. AugustinGermany, Tech. Rep. GMD Report 159, 2002.
[21] M. Hermans and B. Schrauwen, “Recurrent kernel machines: Computing with infinite echo state networks,” Neural Computation,
vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 104–133, 2013/11/22 2011.
[22] M. Lukoševičius, H. Jaeger, and B. Schrauwen, “Reservoir computing trends,” KI - Künstliche Intelligenz, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 365–371,
2012.
[23] A. Atiya and A. Parlos, “New results on recurrent network training: unifying the algorithms and accelerating convergence,” Neural
Networks, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 697–709, 2000.
[24] A. Rodan and P. Tino, “Minimum complexity echo state network,”
Neural Networks, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 131–144,
2011.
[25] M. Hénon, “A two-dimensional mapping with a strange attractor,”
Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 69–77,
1976.
[26] H. Jaeger, “The “echo state” approach to analysing and training
recurrent neural networks,” St. Augustin: German National Research
Center for Information Technology, Tech. Rep. GMD Rep. 148,
2001.
[27] ——, “Short term memory in echo state networks,” GMDForschungszentrum Informationstechnik, Tech. Rep. GMD Report
152, 2002.
[28] M. D. D. Verstraeten, B. Schrauwen and D. Stroobandt, “An
experimental unification of reservoir computing methods,” Neural
Networks, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 391–403, 2007.
[29] G. K. Venayagamoorthy and B. Shishir, “Effects of spectral radius
and settling time in the performance of echo state networks,” Neural
Networks, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 861 – 863, 2009.
[30] C. Gallicchio and A. Micheli, “Architectural and markovian factors
of echo state networks,” Neural Networks, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 440 –
456, 2011.
[31] Q. Song and Z. Feng, “Effects of connectivity structure of complex
echo state network on its prediction performance for nonlinear time
series,” Neurocomputing, vol. 73, no. 10–12, pp. 2177 – 2185, 2010.
[32] E. Bullmore and O. Sporns, “Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems,” Nat Rev Neurosci,
vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 312–312, 04 2009.
[33] S. Dasgupta, P. Manoonpong, and F. Woergoetter, “Small world
topology of dynamic reservoir for effective solution of memory
guided tasks,” Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, no. 177.
[34] M. Massar and S. Massar, “Mean-field theory of echo state networks,” Phys. Rev. E, vol. 87, p. 042809, Apr 2013.
[35] M. Hagan and M.-B. Menhaj, “Training feedforward networks with
the marquardt algorithm,” Neural Networks, IEEE Transactions on,
vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 989–993, 1994.
[36] H. Jaeger, M. Lukoševičius, D. Popovici, and U. Siewert, “Optimization and applications of echo state networks with leaky- integrator
neurons,” Neural Networks, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 335–352, 2007.
[37] S. Dasgupta, F. Wrgtter, and P. Manoonpong, “Information theoretic
self-organised adaptation in reservoirs for temporal memory tasks,”
in Engineering Applications of Neural Networks, ser. Communications in Computer and Information Science, C. Jayne, S. Yue, and
L. Iliadis, Eds. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012, vol. 311, pp.
31–40.
[38] J. Bi and K. P. Bennett, “Regression error characteristic curves.” in
ICML, T. Fawcett and N. Mishra, Eds. AAAI Press, 2003, pp.
43–50.
[39] W. Waegeman, B. De Baets, and L. Boullart, “A comparison of
different ROC measures for ordinal regression,” in Proceedings
of the 3rd International Workshop on ROC Analysis in Machine
Learning., N. Lachiche, C. Ferri, and S. Macskassy, Eds., 2006, pp.
63–69.
[40] ——, “ROC analysis in ordinal regression learning,” Pattern Recogn.
Lett., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1–9, Jan. 2008.
[41] J. Larsen, “A generalization error estimate for nonlinear systems,”
11
[42]
[43]
[44]
[45]
[46]
[47]
[48]
[49]
[50]
[51]
[52]
[53]
[54]
[55]
[56]
in Neural Networks for Signal Processing, 1992. II., Proceedings of
the 1992 IEEE Workshop on, 1992, pp. 29–38.
J. Larsen, C. Svarer, L. Andersen, and L. Hansen, “Adaptive regularization in neural network modeling,” in Neural Networks: Tricks
of the Trade, ser. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, G. Orr and
K.-R. Mller, Eds. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1998, vol. 1524, pp.
113–132.
J. Larsen, L. Hansen, C. Svarer, and M. Ohlsson, “Design and regularization of neural networks: the optimal use of a validation set,”
in Neural Networks for Signal Processing, 1996. VI. Proceedings of
the 1996 IEEE Workshop on, 1996, pp. 62–71.
J. Larsen and L. Hansen, “Empirical generalization assessment of
neural network models,” in Neural Networks for Signal Processing,
1995. V. Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE Workshop on, 1995, pp.
30–39.
——, “Generalization performance of regularized neural network
models,” in Neural Networks for Signal Processing, 1994. IV. Proceedings of the 1994 IEEE Workshop on, 1994, pp. 42–51.
S. Lawrence, C. L. Giles, and A. C. Tsoi, “Lessons in neural network
training: Overfitting may be harder than expected,” in In Proceedings
of the Fourteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence,
AAAI-97. AAAI Press, 1997, pp. 540–545.
N. Murata, S. Yoshizawa, and S.-I. Amari, “Network information
criterion-determining the number of hidden units for an artificial
neural network model,” Neural Networks, IEEE Transactions on,
vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 865–872, 1994.
J. Moody, “Prediction risk and architecture selection for neural
networks,” in From Statistics to Neural Networks, ser. NATO ASI
Series, V. Cherkassky, J. Friedman, and H. Wechsler, Eds. Springer
Berlin Heidelberg, 1994, vol. 136, pp. 147–165.
L. K. Hansen and C. E. Rasmussen, “Pruning from adaptive regularization,” Neural Computation, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 1223–1232,
2013/12/11 1994.
B. R. Stallard and J. G. Taylor, “Quantifying multivariate classification performance: the problem of overfitting,” pp. 426–436, 1999.
D. M. Hawkins, “The problem of overfitting,” Journal of Chemical
Information and Computer Sciences, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2004.
E. Baum and D. Haussler, “What size net gives valid generalization?”
Neural Computation, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 151–160, 1989.
B. Amirikian and H. Nishimura, “What size network is good for
generalization of a specific task of interest?” Neural Networks, vol. 7,
no. 2, pp. 321–329, 1994.
M. Kearns, Y. Mansour, D. Ron, R. Rubinfeld, R. E. Schapire,
and L. Sellie, “On the learnability of discrete distributions,” in
Proceedings of the Twenty-sixth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory
of Computing, ser. STOC ’94. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 1994,
pp. 273–282.
R. Lange and R. Männer, “Quantifying a critical training set size
for generalization and overfitting using teacher neural networks,” in
ICANN ’94, M. Marinaro and P. G. Morasso, Eds. Springer London,
1994, pp. 497–500.
L. Valiant, “A theory of the learnable,” Communications of the ACM,
vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 1134–1142, 1984.
| 9cs.NE
|
Enhanced Linear-array Photoacoustic Beamforming using Modified
Coherence Factor
Moein Mozaffarzadeha,c , Yan Yand , Mohammad Mehrmohammadid , Bahador
Makkiabadia,b,*
arXiv:1710.00157v2 [physics.med-ph] 29 Jan 2018
a
Research Center for Biomedical Technologies and Robotics (RCBTR), Institute for Advanced Medical Technologies
(IAMT), Tehran, Iran.
b
Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical
Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
c
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
d
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Abstract. Photoacoustic imaging (PAI) is a promising medical imaging modality providing the spatial resolution of
ultrasound (US) imaging and the contrast of optical imaging. For linear-array PAI, an image beamformer can be used
as the reconstruction algorithm. Delay-and-sum (DAS) is the most prevalent beamforming algorithm in PAI. However,
using DAS beamformer leads to low resolution images as well as high sidelobes due to non desired contribution of
off-axis signals. Coherence factor (CF) is a weighting method in which each pixel of the reconstructed image is
weighted, based on the spatial spectrum of the aperture, to mainly improve the contrast. In this paper, we demonstrate
that the numerator of the formula of CF contains a DAS algebra, and it is proposed to use the delay-multiply-and-sum
(DMAS) beamformer instead of the available DAS on the numerator. The proposed weighting technique, modified
CF (MCF), has been evaluated numerically and experimentally compared to CF. It was shown that MCF leads to
lower sidelobes and better detectable targets. The quantitative results of the experiment (using wire targets) show that
MCF leads to for about 45% and 40% improvement, in comparison with CF, in the terms of signal-to-noise ratio and
full-width-half-maximum, respectively.
Keywords: Photoacoustic imaging, beamforming, linear-array imaging, noise suppression, contrast improvement..
*Bahador Makkiabadi, [email protected]
1 Introduction
Photoacoustic imaging (PAI), also called optoacoustic imaging, is an emerging medical imaging
technique which combines the properties of optical and ultrasound (US) imaging.1, 2 PAI is based
on the photoacoustic (PA) effect, and combined US and PA properties provide structural, functional and potentially the molecular information of tissue.3, 4 In this imaging modality, acoustic
waves are generated, as a result of an electromagnetic pulse illumination, based on thermoelastic
effect.5 Then, the optical absorption distribution map of the tissue is reconstructed through a reconstruction algorithm.6 PAI is a scalable imaging modality used in different preclinical and clinical
applications e.g., tumor detection,7, 8 ocular imaging,9 monitoring oxygenation in blood vessels,10
1
and functional imaging.5, 11 There are two types of PAI: photoacoustic tomography (PAT) and photoacoustic microscopy (PAM).12–14 In PAT, an array of US transducers in the form of linear, arc
or circular shape is used for data acquisition, and mathematical reconstruction algorithms are used
to obtain optical absorption distribution map of the tissue.15 Recently, low-cost PAT and PAM
systems are extensively being investigated16–19
In linear-array PAI, image reconstruction is done with beamformers, as in US imaging. The problem of image reconstruction in linear-array imaging for PAI and US imaging can be addressed in
almost a same way. There are some modifications which should be considered in image reconstruction for these two imaging modalities, and the modifications are directly concerned with the
transmission part.20 In US imaging, US pulses are transmitted, but in PAI, the laser illumination
plays the excitation role. There are many studies focused on using one beamforming technique
for US and PA image formation to reduce the cost of the integrated US/PA system.21–23 Delayand-sum (DAS), as the most basic and commonly used beamformer in US and PAI due to its
simple implementation, is a blind beamformer and results in low quality images.24 Development
of a proper beamforming algorithm has been widely investigated in US imaging in different studies.25–28 Adaptive beamforming such as minimum variance (MV) can be a proper option to weight
the signals and reduce the effect of the off-axis signals in the reconstructed images.29 MV combined with CF has been used for PAI.30 Short-lag spatial coherence (SLSC) beamformer was used
in PAI for contract enhancement.31 Recently, to address the relatively poor appearance of interventional devices such as needles, guide wires, and catheters, in conventional US images, delay
and standard deviation (DASD) beamforming algorithm was introduced.32 In 2015,33 Matrone et
al. introduced a new beamforming algorithm namely delay-multiply-and-sum (DMAS). This algorithm was initially used as a reconstruction algorithm in confocal microwave imaging for breast
2
cancer detection.34 Although it leads to a higher resolution compared to DAS, the resolution is not
well enough in comparison with the resolution gained by MV-based algorithms. MV beamformer
has been combined with DMAS algorithm to improve the resolution of DMAS.35, 36 Double stage
DMAS (DS-DMAS) was introduced for PAI.37, 38 In addition, it was shown that it outperforms
DMAS in the terms of contrast and sidelobes for US imaging too.39 Eigenspace-Based Minimum
Variance (EIBMV) and forward-backward (FB) MV beamformers also have been applied to medical US imaging to improve the image quality and robustness.40, 41 EIBMV was combined with
DMAS to further improve the PA image quality.42, 43
In this paper, a novel version of coherence factor (CF) algorithms is introduced. We have demonstrated that the numerator in the formula of the CF weighting procedure is the output of DAS
algorithm, and it is proposed to improve the image quality by including DMAS algebra in CF,
instead of the existing DAS.
The rest of the paper is organized as follows. Section 2 contains the theory of beamformers and
the proposed method. Numerical simulation of the imaging system and the experimental design
along with the results, and the performance evaluation are presented in section 3 and section 4,
respectively. Discussion is presented in section 5, and finally the conclusion is presented in section
6.
2 Materials and Methods
PA signals are generated and detected after the laser has illuminated the imaging target. The
obtained signals can be used to reconstruct the PA images through a reconstruction algorithm such
3
as DAS which can be written as follows:
yDAS (k) =
M
X
i=1
xi (k − ∆i ),
(1)
where yDAS (k) is the output of beamformer, k is the time index, M is the number of array elements and xi (k) and ∆i are the detected signals and the corresponding time delay for detector
i, respectively.44 To provide a more efficient beamformer and improve the quality of the reconstructed image, coherence factor (CF) can be used combined with DAS, which leads to sidelobe
levels reduction and contrast enhancement.45 CF, as a weighting procedure, is presented by:
PM
2
i=1 xid (k)
,
CF (k) =
P
2
|x
(k)|
M M
id
i=1
(2)
where xid is the delayed detected signal. The output of combined DAS and CF is given by:
yDAS+CF (k) = CF (k) × yDAS (k).
(3)
Implementing the DAS beamformer is simple which is why is it the most common beamforming
algorithm in US and PAI. However, this algorithm provides a low off-axis signal rejection and noise
suppression. Consequently, DAS results in reconstructed images having high levels of sidelobe and
a low resolution. To address the limitations of DAS, DMAS was suggested in.33 The same as DAS,
DMAS calculates corresponding samples for each element of the array based on the delays, but
samples go through a correlation process before adding them up. The DMAS formula is as follows:
4
yDM AS (k) =
M
−1
X
M
X
i=1 j=i+1
xi (k − ∆i )xj (k − ∆j ).
(4)
To overcome the dimensionally squared problem of (4), following modifications are suggested
in:33
x̂ij (k) =
q
sign[xi (k − ∆i )xj (k − ∆j )] |xi (k − ∆i )xj (k − ∆j )|,
for
(5)
1 6 i 6 j 6 M.
yDM AS (k) =
M
−1
X
M
X
x̂ij (k).
(6)
i=1 j=i+1
DMAS algorithm is a correlation process, and a non-linear beamforming algorithm in which the
autocorrelation of the aperture is used. A product in time domain is equivalent to the convolution
of the spectra of the signals in the frequency domain. Consequently, new components centered at
the zero frequency and the harmonic frequency appear in the spectrum due to the similar ranges of
frequency for xi (k − ∆i ) and xj (k − ∆j ). A band-pass filter is applied on the beamformed output
signal to only pass the necessary frequency components, generated after the non-linear operations.
Having a closer look at (2), the numerator of CF algorithm is the output of DAS beamformer, and
the formula can be written as follows:
2
yDAS (k)
CF (k) =
.
PM
M i=1 |xid (k)|2
(7)
Having CF combined with DAS, (3), leads to sidelobes reduction and contrast enhancement compared to (1). However, in this paper, it is proposed to use the output of DMAS algorithm instead
5
of the DAS algebra on the numerator of CF formula. The proposed weighting is called modified
CF (MCF), and its algebra is as follows:
2
yDM AS (k)
.
M CF (k) =
PM
M i=1 |xid (k)|2
(8)
MCF will be used the same as CF to weight the samples. The combination of DAS and MCF can
be written as follows:
yDAS+M CF (k) = M CF (k) × yDAS (k).
(9)
Since the DMAS outperforms DAS in the terms of resolution and sidelobes, it is expected that the
proposed weighting method provides a higher image quality compared to (2). In what follows, it
is shown that the proposed method outperforms the conventional CF weighting.
3 Numerical Results and Performance Assessment
In this section, numerical results are presented to evaluate the performance of the proposed algorithm in comparison with DAS and combination of DAS and CF (DAS+CF).
3.1 Point Targets
K-wave Matlab toolbox was used to simulate the numerical study.46 Eleven 0.1 mm spherical
absorbers were positioned along the vertical axis every 5 mm as initial pressure. The first absorber
was 25 mm away from the transducer surface. The imaging region was 20 mm in lateral axis
and 80 mm in vertical axis. A linear array having M =128 elements operating at 7 M Hz central
frequency and 77 % fractional bandwidth was used to detect the PA signals generated from defined
initial pressures. The sampling frequency is 50 M Hz. Speed of sound was assumed to be 1540
6
Fig 1: Reconstructed images for simulated detected data using (a) DAS, (b) DAS+CF and (c)
DAS+MCF. A linear array and point targets were used for numerical design. All images are shown
with a dynamic range of 60 dB. Noise was added to the detected signals having a SNR of 50 dB .
m/s during simulations. Envelope detection, performed by means of the Hilbert transform, has
been used for all presented images, and the obtained lines are normalized and log-compressed to
form the final images.
The reconstructed images are shown in Fig. 1 where Gaussian noise was added to the detected signals having a SNR of 50 dB. As is demonstrated, DAS leads to high sidelobes and after the depth
of 50 mm the targets are barely detectable as a point target. Using CF combined with DAS results
in lower sidelobes and a higher image quality. Fig. 1(c) shows that the proposed method suppresses
the artifacts and sidelobes more than the conventional CF. To compare the reconstructed images
in detail, the lateral variations at two depths of imaging are shown in Fig. 2. As it is demonstrated,
the MCF method causes lower sidelobes. Consider, for instance, the depth of 25 mm where the
levels of sidelobes for DAS, DAS+CF and DAS+MCF are for about -36 dB, -99 dB and -124 dB,
which indicates the superiority of the proposed method compared to the conventional CF in the
7
Fig 2: Lateral variations of the reconstructed images shown in Fig. 1 at the depths of (a) 25 mm
and (b) 40 mm.
Fig 3: Reconstructed images for simulated detected data using (a) DAS, (b) DAS+CF and (c)
DAS+MCF. A linear array and point targets were used for numerical design. All images are shown
with a dynamic range of 60 dB. Noise was added to the detected signals having a SNR of 0 dB .
term of sidelobe reduction.
To evaluate the proposed method at the presence of high level of noise of the imaging system,
Gaussian noise was added to the detected signals having a SNR of 0 dB. The reconstructed images are shown in Fig. 3, and as can be seen, the formed image obtained by DAS is highly affected
by noise. CF improves the image quality by suppressing the effects of noise. However, the sidelobes still degrade the image quality. The MCF reduces the sidelobes and improves the target
8
Fig 4: Lateral variations of the reconstructed images shown in Fig. 3 at the depths of (a) 25 mm
and (b) 45 mm.
detectability, resulting in a higher image quality in comparison with CF. It should be noticed that
the absence of the tails attached to the targets (can be seen in Fig. 1) is due to the high level of
noise. To put it more simply, the power of noise is more than the tails, and that is why they are
not seen in Fig. 3. The lateral variations for the images shown in Fig. 3, are shown in Fig. 4, and
as can be seen, the higher performance of MCF in the terms of sideloebs and noise suppression,
compared to CF, is clear.
3.2 Quantitative Evaluation
To quantitatively assess the performance of the proposed weighting method, the full-with-halfmaximum (FWHM) in -6 dB and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) are calculated and presented in Table
1 and Table 2, respectively. SNR is calculated using the method explained in.37 As shown in Table
1, the FWHM gained by MCF, at the all depths, is lower than CF, showing the superiority of MCF.
Consider, for instance, the depth of 40 mm where DAS, DAS+CF and DAS+MCF results in 2.2
mm, 1.3 mm and 0.9 mm, respectively. In other word, MCF improves the FWHM for about 0.4
mm compared to CF. As shown in Table 2, SNR gained by the proposed weighting method is
higher compared to the CF which also indicates the superiority of MCF. Consider, for example,
the depth of 50 mm where the SNR for DAS, DAS+CF and DAS+MCF is for about 36.9 dB, 65.0
9
Table 1: -6 dB FWHM (mm) values at the different depths.
``Beamformer
DAS DAS+CF DAS+MCF
```
```
Depth(mm)
`
25
1.1
0.6
0.4
1.3
0.8
0.6
30
35
1.6
0.9
0.7
1.9
1.1
0.8
40
45
2.2
1.3
0.9
50
2.6
1.6
1.1
3.0
1.8
1.3
55
60
3.5
2.1
1.5
3.7
2.2
1.6
65
70
4.2
2.5
1.8
75
4.8
2.9
2.0
```
```
Table 2: SNR (dB) values at the different depths.
``Beamformer
DAS DAS+CF DAS+MCF
```
```
Depth(mm)
`
25
47.2
76.3
119.6
30
44.7
73.0
116.9
43.0
72.9
117.8
35
40.7
69.5
116.5
40
45
38.9
68.0
113.3
36.9
65.0
110.4
50
35.3
63.4
109.0
55
60
34.2
61.8
107.3
65
33.5
60.1
105.3
32.2
58.6
103.2
70
75
31.4
56.2
101.6
```
```
dB and 110.4 dB, respectively.
3.3 MCF Applied to DMAS
It should be noted that the proposed method in this paper is a weighting technique which can be
applied to any beamformer to achieve a higher image quality. Here, the aim is to evaluate the MCF
when is applied to other beamformers except DAS. The DMAS beamformer was selected. The
results are presented in Fig. 5. As demonstrated, the proposed method leads to higher sidelobes
reduction and artifacts removal when it is applied on the DMAS, compared to CF. In other words,
10
Fig 5: Reconstructed images for simulated detected data using (a) DAS, (b) DAS+CF, (c)
DAS+MCF, (d) DMAS, (e) DMAS+CF and (e) DMAS+MCF. A linear array and point targets
were used for numerical design. All images are shown with a dynamic range of 70 dB. Noise was
added to the detected signals having a SNR of 20 dB .
Fig 6: Lateral variations of the reconstructed images shown in Fig. 5 at the depths of 45 mm.
even though the CF degrades the sidelobes (in DAS and DMAS), MCF outperforms the conventional CF with a higher artifacts suppression. For further evaluation, consider the lateral variations
at the depth of 45 mm, shown in Fig. 6, where the MCF reduces the sidelobes for about 20 dB,
compared to the conventional CF.
11
Fig 7: The schematic of the setup used for the experimental PAI.
Table 3: FWHM (mm) values, in -6 dB, at the two depths of imaging using the experimental data.
```
```
``Beamformer
DAS DAS+CF DAS+MCF
```
```
Depth(mm)
`
22
0.68
0.59
0.30
24
0.66
0.47
0.28
4 Experimental Results
To further evaluate the proposed weighting method and its effect on enhancing PA images, phantom experiments were performed in which a phantom consists of 2 light absorbing wires with
diameter of 150 µm were placed 1 mm apart from each other in a water tank. The schematic of the
experimental setup is shown in Fig. 7. In this experiment, we utilized a Nd:YAG pulsed laser, with
the pulse repetition rate of 30 Hz at wavelengths of 532 nm. A programmable digital ultrasound
scanner (Verasonics Vantage 128), equipped with a linear array transducer (L11-4v) operating at
frequency range between 4 to 9 M Hz was utilized to acquire the PA RF data. A high speed FPGA
was used to synchronize the light excitation and PA signal acquisition.
The reconstructed images are shown in Fig. 8. As it is demonstrated, DAS results in high levels
of noise in the images, degrading the image quality, and image is affected by sidelobes. Using CF
improves the images quality, but the image is still affected by noise and sidelobes. Finally, the
proposed weighting method enhances the image by providing higher noise suppression and lower
12
Fig 8: Reconstructed images for the experimental detected data using (a) DAS, (b) DAS+CF and
(c) DAS+MCF. A linear array and wire target phantom were used for the experimental design. All
images are shown with a dynamic range of 80 dB.
levels of sidelobes compared to conventional CF. To evaluate in more detail, the lateral variations at
two depths for targets shown in Fig. 8, are presented in Fig. 9. Considering Fig. 9(a), the proposed
weighting method results in lower sidelobes and noise where DAS, DAS+CF and DAS+MCF leads
to -40 dB, -84 dB and -134 dB, respectively. Thus, the proposed method outperforms conventional
CF. FWHM in -6 dB has been calculated for the experimental results and shown in Table 3. It can
be seen that the proposed weighting method results in narrower mainlobe in comparison with CF.
Consider, for example, the target at the depth of 22 mm where DAS+MCF results in 0.38 mm
0.29 mm improvement compared to DAS and DAS+CF, respectively. Moreover, SNR has been
calculated for the experimental data and the results are shown in Table 4 where the MCF causes
higher SNR compared to conventional CF for both depths of imaging.
13
Fig 9: Lateral variations of the reconstructed images shown in Fig. 8 at the depths of (a) 22 mm
and (b) 24 mm.
Table 4: SNR (dB) values for the experimental images shown in Fig. 8.
```
```
``Beamformer
DAS DAS+CF DAS+MCF
```
```
Depth(mm)
`
22
48.5
60.7
90.4
24
47.2
59.6
88.2
4.1 Ex Vivo Imaging
In this study, an ex vivo experimental tissue study have been designed to evaluate the performance
of the proposed algorithm. A piece of a breast tissue (about 4 cm× 4 cm× 3 cm) is extracted
from a new sacrificed chicken. Two pencil leads with a diameter of 0.5 mm are embedded inside
the breast tissue, having an axial distance of about 5 mm. Fig 10 shows the photographs of the
imaged tissue. The PA signals are collected with a combined linear US/PA imaging probe.47 As
can be seen in Fig. 11(a), the artifacts and the background noise degrade the PA image quality
obtained by DAS. As is expected based on the previous results, applying CF to the DAS algorithm
would reduce the artifacts and sidelobes. The expectations are satisfied, as shown in Fig. 11(b),
but the PA image can be further improved using MCF. As demonstrated in Fig. 11(c), the MCF
leads to higher noise suppression and sidelobes degrading in comparison with the conventional
CF. For further evaluation, the lateral variations of the reconstructed images shown in Fig. 11, are
presented in Fig. 12 where the superiority of the proposed method in terms of lower sidelobes and
14
Fig 10: (a) The phantom used for the experiment. (b) The ex vivo imaging setup.
Fig 11: Reconstructed ex vivo images using (a) DAS, (b) DAS+CF and (c) DAS+MCF. A lineararray and the phantom shown in Fig. 10 were used for the experimental design. All images are
shown with a dynamic range of 80 dB.
higher noise suppression is obvious. SNR is calculated for the ex vivo images (presented in Table
5). The quantitative evaluation indicates that MCF outperforms the conventional CF. In particular,
it improves the SNR for about 14 dB, at the depth of 31.3 mm, compared to the CF.
5 Discussion
The main enhancement gained by the proposed method is higher contrast and lower sidelobes.
Considering the fact that DAS beamformer results in a low quality image, having it on the numerator of the formula of CF would degrade the performance of the CF weighting procedure. On
15
Fig 12: Lateral variations of the reconstructed images shown in Fig. 11 at the depths of (a) 29 mm
and (b) 31.3 mm.
Table 5: SNR (dB) values for the ex vivo images shown in Fig. 11.
```
```
``Beamformer
DAS DAS+CF DAS+MCF
```
```
Depth(mm)
`
29
41.34
52.81
68.99
40.35
50.78
64.84
31.3
the other hand, in,33 Matrone et al. proved that DMAS can be used instead of DAS for image reconstruction, and it was shown that the main improvement gained by DMAS was higher contrast.
Thus, it can be perceived that using DMAS instead of the existing DAS on the numerator of CF
algebra would results in contrast enhancement due to its auto-correlation process which is a nonlinear operation. As can be seen in Fig. 1, Fig. 3, Fig. 8 and Fig. 11, using the correlation process
of DMAS inside the formula of CF results in higher noise suppression and artifact reduction, leading to the higher image quality compared to DAS and DAS+CF. In other word, the multiplication
operation inside the DMAS procedure reduces the presence of noise and off-axis signals on the
reconstructed images, and improves the image quality. The advantage of the proposed weighting
method in the term of sidelobes reduction can be seen in the Fig. 2, Fig. 4, Fig. 9 and Fig. 12.
As can be seen in the lateral variations, the width of mainlobe has decreased which is a merit of
MCF. Since DMAS improves the resolution gained by DAS, shown in,37 the MCF leads to higher
resolution in comparison with CF. To put it more simply, presence of DMAS inside the formula
16
of MCF is the reason of higher resolution achieved by MCF. Despite all the results, it was necessary to evaluate the proposed method quantitatively. Considering the numbers presented in the
Tables of the last section, it can be seen that the proposed method outperforms CF in the terms of
FWHM and SNR. The proposed method significantly outperforms CF when the targets are at the
high depths of imaging. As shown in Fig. 1, for the targets located at the depths of 55 mm-75 mm,
sidelobes and artifatcs are better reduced compared to the lower depths. This also can be perceived
regarding the Table 2 where SNR improvement in high depths is more than lower depths (80 %
and 56 % for 25 mm and 75 mm, respectively). It should be noticed that, as mentioned in the
section 1, the beamforming and concerned weighting methods can be applied on both the US and
PAI cases. CF or MCF would be proper options for US imaging. However, using multiple times
of the CF or MCF ( MCF2 and MCF3 ) would remove the speckles in the US images. The speckle
removal is not desired in applications in which the speckles provide helpful information for diagnosis. Therefore, the MCF2 and MCF3 would further increase the quality of the PA images, but
it is not suggested to use them for the conventional US imaging. MCF The computational burden
imposed by the proposed method is the same as DMAS, and the order of processing in O(M 2 )
while the order of processing for CF is the same as DAS which is O(M ). Therefore, it should be
mentioned that the improvements are obtained at the expense of higher computational burden in
comparison with CF. The proposed method can be implemented on a FPGA device, e.g. on an
Altera FPGA of the Stratix IV family (Altera Corp., San Jose, CA, USA). The time consumption
has been reported in33 for DMAS implementation, which indicates that the proposed method can
be used in clinical PAI systems. In applications in which phased (or micro-convex) arrays are used,
MCF can provide a further enhancement compared to CF. We have tested the proposed algorithm
for ex vivo PAI, and the results were promising (shown in Fig. 11 and Fig. 12). In small-parts
17
and vascular US imaging, for instance in vivo imaging of the carotid artery, where the resolution
and specially sidelobes are of importance, MCF can be used, providing higher contrast and noise
suppression in comparison with CF.
6 Conclusion
In this paper, a novel weighting procedure has been introduced by combining the conventional CF
and the DMAS beamformer. It was shown that the numerator of the formula of CF can be treated
as a DAS, and it was proposed to use DMAS instead of the existing DAS inside the formula of
CF. The MCF has been evaluated numerically and experimentally, and all the results showed the
higher performance of MCF compared to CF. For the experimental results obtained by the wire
target phantom, MCF reduced the sidelobes for about 50 dB in comparison with CF, indicating the
higher contrast, and the quantitative results showed that MCF improves the SNR and FWHM for
about 45% and 40%, respectively.
Acknowledgments
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or
not-for-profit sectors, and the authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.
References
1 L. Li, L. Zhu, C. Ma, et al., “Single-impulse panoramic photoacoustic computed tomography
of small-animal whole-body dynamics at high spatiotemporal resolution,” Nature Biomedical
Engineering 1(5), Art–No (2017).
2 L. V. Wang and J. Yao, “A practical guide to photoacoustic tomography in the life sciences,”
Nature methods 13(8), 627–638 (2016).
18
3 J. Xia and L. V. Wang, “Small-animal whole-body photoacoustic tomography: a review,”
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 61(5), 1380–1389 (2014).
4 M. Mehrmohammadi, S. Joon Yoon, D. Yeager, et al., “Photoacoustic imaging for cancer
detection and staging,” Current molecular imaging 2(1), 89–105 (2013).
5 M. Nasiriavanaki, J. Xia, H. Wan, et al., “High-resolution photoacoustic tomography
of resting-state functional connectivity in the mouse brain,” Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences 111(1), 21–26 (2014).
6 M. Jeon and C. Kim, “Multimodal photoacoustic tomography,” IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 15(5), 975–982 (2013).
7 B. Guo, J. Li, H. Zmuda, et al., “Multifrequency microwave-induced thermal acoustic imaging for breast cancer detection,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 54(11),
2000–2010 (2007).
8 M. Heijblom, W. Steenbergen, and S. Manohar, “Clinical photoacoustic breast imaging: the
twente experience.,” IEEE Pulse 6(3), 42–46 (2015).
9 A. de La Zerda, Y. M. Paulus, R. Teed, et al., “Photoacoustic ocular imaging,” Optics letters
35(3), 270–272 (2010).
10 R. O. Esenaliev, I. V. Larina, K. V. Larin, et al., “Optoacoustic technique for noninvasive
monitoring of blood oxygenation: a feasibility study,” Applied Optics 41(22), 4722–4731
(2002).
11 J. Yao, J. Xia, K. I. Maslov, et al., “Noninvasive photoacoustic computed tomography of
mouse brain metabolism in vivo,” Neuroimage 64, 257–266 (2013).
19
12 Y. Zhou, J. Yao, and L. V. Wang, “Tutorial on photoacoustic tomography,” Journal of Biomedical Optics 21(6), 061007–061007 (2016).
13 J. Yao and L. V. Wang, “Photoacoustic microscopy,” Laser & Photonics Reviews 7(5), 758–
778 (2013).
14 L. V. Wang and S. Hu, “Photoacoustic tomography: in vivo imaging from organelles to organs,” Science 335(6075), 1458–1462 (2012).
15 M. Xu and L. V. Wang, “Time-domain reconstruction for thermoacoustic tomography in a
spherical geometry,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 21(7), 814–822 (2002).
16 A. Hariri, A. Fatima, N. Mohammadian, et al., “Development of low-cost photoacoustic
imaging systems using very low-energy pulsed laser diodes,” Journal of biomedical optics
22(7), 075001 (2017).
17 P. K. Upputuri and M. Pramanik, “Dynamic in vivo imaging of small animal brain using
pulsed laser diode-based photoacoustic tomography system,” Journal of biomedical optics
22(9), 090501 (2017).
18 A. Hariri, A. Fatima, N. Mohammadian, et al., “Towards low cost photoacoustic microscopy
system for evaluation of skin health,” in Imaging Spectrometry XXI, 9976, 99760X, International Society for Optics and Photonics (2016).
19 P. K. Upputuri and M. Pramanik, “Performance characterization of low-cost, high-speed,
portable pulsed laser diode photoacoustic tomography (pld-pat) system,” Biomedical optics
express 6(10), 4118–4129 (2015).
20 C.-W. Wei, T.-M. Nguyen, J. Xia, et al., “Real-time integrated photoacoustic and ultrasound
20
(paus) imaging system to guide interventional procedures: ex vivo study,” IEEE transactions
on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control 62(2), 319–328 (2015).
21 H. K. Zhang, M. A. L. Bell, X. Guo, et al., “Synthetic-aperture based photoacoustic rebeamforming (spare) approach using beamformed ultrasound data,” Biomedical optics express 7(8), 3056–3068 (2016).
22 E. Mercep, G. Jeng, S. Morscher, et al., “Hybrid optoacoustic tomography and pulse-echo
ultrasonography using concave arrays,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics,
and Frequency Control 62(9), 1651–1661 (2015).
23 T. Harrison and R. J. Zemp, “The applicability of ultrasound dynamic receive beamformers
to photoacoustic imaging,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency
Control 58(10), 2259–2263 (2011).
24 C. G. Hoelen and F. F. de Mul, “Image reconstruction for photoacoustic scanning of tissue
structures,” Applied Optics 39(31), 5872–5883 (2000).
25 T. Szasz, A. Basarab, and D. Kouamé, “Beamforming through regularized inverse problems
in ultrasound medical imaging,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control 63(12), 2031–2044 (2016).
26 N. Q. Nguyen and R. W. Prager, “High-resolution ultrasound imaging with unified pixelbased beamforming,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 35(1), 98–108 (2016).
27 C. Yoon, H. H. Kim, and K. K. Shung, “Development of a low-complexity, cost-effective
digital beamformer architecture for high-frequency ultrasound imaging,” IEEE Transactions
on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control 64(6), 1002–1008 (2017).
21
28 C. A. Samson, A. Bezanson, and J. A. Brown, “A sub-nyquist, variable sampling, highfrequency phased array beamformer,” IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and
frequency control 64(3), 568–576 (2017).
29 N. Nguyen and R. Prager, “Minimum variance approaches to ultrasound pixel-based beamforming,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging (2016).
30 S. Park, A. B. Karpiouk, S. R. Aglyamov, et al., “Adaptive beamforming for photoacoustic
imaging,” Optics letters 33(12), 1291–1293 (2008).
31 M. A. L. Bell, N. Kuo, D. Y. Song, et al., “Short-lag spatial coherence beamforming of photoacoustic images for enhanced visualization of prostate brachytherapy seeds,” Biomedical
optics express 4(10), 1964–1977 (2013).
32 R. S. Bandaru, A. R. Sornes, J. Hermans, et al., “Delay and standard deviation beamforming
to enhance specular reflections in ultrasound imaging,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics,
Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control 63(12), 2057–2068 (2016).
33 G. Matrone, A. S. Savoia, G. Caliano, et al., “The delay multiply and sum beamforming
algorithm in ultrasound b-mode medical imaging,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
34(4), 940–949 (2015).
34 H. B. Lim, N. T. T. Nhung, E.-P. Li, et al., “Confocal microwave imaging for breast cancer
detection: Delay-multiply-and-sum image reconstruction algorithm,” IEEE Transactions on
Biomedical Engineering 55(6), 1697–1704 (2008).
35 M. Mozaffarzadeh, A. Mahloojifar, and M. Orooji, “Medical photoacoustic beamforming using minimum variance-based delay multiply and sum,” in SPIE Digital Optical Technologies,
1033522–1033522, International Society for Optics and Photonics (2017).
22
36 M. Mozaffarzadeh, A. Mahloojifar, M. Orooji, et al., “Linear array photoacoustic imaging
using minimum variance-based delay multiply and sum adaptive beamforming algorithm,”
arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.07965 (2017).
37 M. Mozaffarzadeh, A. Mahloojifar, M. Orooji, et al., “Double-stage delay multiply and sum
beamforming algorithm: Application to linear-array photoacoustic imaging,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 65(1), 31–42 (2018).
38 M. Mozaffarzadeh, A. Mahloojifar, and M. Orooji, “Image enhancement and noise reduction
using modified delay-multiply-and-sum beamformer: Application to medical photoacoustic imaging,” in Electrical Engineering (ICEE), 2017 Iranian Conference on, 65–69, IEEE
(2017).
39 M. Mozaffarzadeh, M. Sadeghi, A. Mahloojifar, et al., “Double stage delay multiply and sum
beamforming algorithm applied to ultrasound medical imaging,” Ultrasound in Medicine and
Biology PP(99), 1–1 (2017).
40 S. Mehdizadeh, A. Austeng, T. F. Johansen, et al., “Eigenspace based minimum variance
beamforming applied to ultrasound imaging of acoustically hard tissues,” IEEE transactions
on medical imaging 31(10), 1912–1921 (2012).
41 T. Zhou, Q.-l. Li, X. Chen, et al., “Forward-backward minimum variance beamforming
combined with coherence weighting applied to ultrasound imaging,” in World Congress on
Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering May 26-31, 2012, Beijing, China, 1092–1096,
Springer (2013).
42 M. Mozaffarzadeh, S. A. O. I. Avanji, A. Mahloojifar, et al., “Photoacoustic imaging using
23
combination of eigenspace-based minimum variance and delay-multiply-and-sum beamformers: Simulation study,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.06523 (2017).
43 M. Mozaffarzadeh, A. Mahloojifar, M. Nasiriavanaki, et al., “Eigenspace-based minimum
variance adaptive beamformer combined with delay multiply and sum: Experimental study,”
arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.01767 (2017).
44 M. Mozaffarzadeh, M. Mehrmohammadi, and B. Makkiabadi, “Image improvement in lineararray photoacoustic imaging using high resolution coherence factor weighting technique,”
arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.02751 (2017).
45 K. W. Rigby, “Method and apparatus for coherence filtering of ultrasound images,” (1999).
US Patent 5,910,115.
46 B. E. Treeby and B. T. Cox, “k-wave: Matlab toolbox for the simulation and reconstruction
of photoacoustic wave fields,” Journal of Biomedical Optics 15(2), 021314–021314 (2010).
47 Y. Yan, M. Basij, E. Hemandez-Andrade, et al., “Endocavity ultrasound and photoacoustic imaging system to evaluate fetal brain perfusion and oxygenation: Preliminary ex vivo
studies,” in Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), 2017 IEEE International, 1–1, IEEE (2017).
Moein Mozaffarzadeh was born in Sari, Iran, in 1993. He received the B.Sc.
degree in Electrical Engineering from Babol Noshirvani University of Technology (Mazandaran,
Iran), in 2015, and the M.Sc. degree in Biomedical Engineering from Tarbiat Modares University (Tehran, Iran), in 2017. He is currently a research assistant at research center for biomedical
24
technologies and robotics, institute for advanced medical technologies (Tehran, Iran). His current research interests include Photoacoustic Image Reconstruction, Ultrasound Beamforming and
Biomedical Imaging.
Yan Yan joined Wayne State University since 2015-May as a PhD student in
functional and molecular ultrasound research laboratory (http://ultrasound.eng.wayne.edu/). His
interesting areas are Medical Image, Object Detection and Data Mining. He had strong background in Computer Science pattern recognition and computer graphics. He holds two bachelors,
Computer science and Post and Telecommunication. He also received a master in computer science
from Wayne State university 2017. His current research interests include Endocavity Ultrasound
and Photoacoustic for fetal and maternal care.
Mohammad Mehrmohammadi received his B.Sc. degree in Electrical Engineering from Sharif University of Technology (Tehran, Iran), the M.Sc. in Electrical and Computer
Engineering from Illinois Institute of Technology (Chicago, IL), and the Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin (Austin, TX). He did his postdoctoral fellowship
at Mayo Clinic College of Medicine (Rochester, Minnesota). Currently, he is an assistant professor of Biomedical/Electrical and Computer Engineering at Wayne State University and scientific
member at Karmanos Cancer Institute.
25
Bahador Makkiabadi received his B.Sc. degree in Electronics Engineering
from Shiraz University (Shiraz, Iran), the M.Sc. in Biomedical Engineering from Amirkabir University of Technology (Tehran, Iran), and the Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering from University of
Surrey (Guildford, Surrey, UK). Currently, he is working at Research Center for Biomedical Technologies and Robotics (RCBTR), Institute for Advanced Medical Technologies (IAMT), Tehran
University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. His research interests include Blind Source Separation, Advanced Array Signal Processing for Medical Applications and Biomedical Imaging.
List of Figures
1
Reconstructed images for simulated detected data using (a) DAS, (b) DAS+CF and
(c) DAS+MCF. A linear array and point targets were used for numerical design.
All images are shown with a dynamic range of 60 dB. Noise was added to the
detected signals having a SNR of 50 dB .
2
Lateral variations of the reconstructed images shown in Fig. 1 at the depths of (a)
25 mm and (b) 40 mm.
3
Reconstructed images for simulated detected data using (a) DAS, (b) DAS+CF and
(c) DAS+MCF. A linear array and point targets were used for numerical design.
All images are shown with a dynamic range of 60 dB. Noise was added to the
detected signals having a SNR of 0 dB .
26
4
Lateral variations of the reconstructed images shown in Fig. 3 at the depths of (a)
25 mm and (b) 45 mm.
5
Reconstructed images for simulated detected data using (a) DAS, (b) DAS+CF, (c)
DAS+MCF, (d) DMAS, (e) DMAS+CF and (e) DMAS+MCF. A linear array and
point targets were used for numerical design. All images are shown with a dynamic
range of 70 dB. Noise was added to the detected signals having a SNR of 20 dB .
6
Lateral variations of the reconstructed images shown in Fig. 5 at the depths of 45
mm.
7
The schematic of the setup used for the experimental PAI.
8
Reconstructed images for the experimental detected data using (a) DAS, (b) DAS+CF
and (c) DAS+MCF. A linear array and wire target phantom were used for the experimental design. All images are shown with a dynamic range of 80 dB.
9
Lateral variations of the reconstructed images shown in Fig. 8 at the depths of (a)
22 mm and (b) 24 mm.
10
(a) The phantom used for the experiment. (b) The ex vivo imaging setup.
11
Reconstructed ex vivo images using (a) DAS, (b) DAS+CF and (c) DAS+MCF.
A linear-array and the phantom shown in Fig. 10 were used for the experimental
design. All images are shown with a dynamic range of 80 dB.
12
Lateral variations of the reconstructed images shown in Fig. 11 at the depths of (a)
29 mm and (b) 31.3 mm.
List of Tables
1
-6 dB FWHM (mm) values at the different depths.
27
2
SNR (dB) values at the different depths.
3
FWHM (mm) values, in -6 dB, at the two depths of imaging using the experimental
data.
4
SNR (dB) values for the experimental images shown in Fig. 8.
5
SNR (dB) values for the ex vivo images shown in Fig. 11.
28
| 7cs.IT
|
Sparse Phase Retrieval via Sparse PCA despite Model
Misspecification: A Simplified and Extended Analysis
arXiv:1712.04106v2 [cs.IT] 13 Dec 2017
Yan Shuo Tan
∗
December 14, 2017
Abstract
We consider the problem of high-dimensional misspecified phase retrieval. This is where
we have an s-sparse signal vector x∗ in Rn , which we wish to recover using sampling vectors
a1 , . . . , am , and measurements y1 , . . . , ym , which are related by the equation f (hai , x∗ i) = yi .
Here, f is an unknown link function satisfying a positive correlation with the quadratic function.
This problem was recently analyzed in [24], which provided recovery guarantees for a two-stage
algorithm with sample complexity m = O(s2 log n). In this paper, we show that the first stage
of their algorithm suffices for signal recovery with the same sample complexity, and extend
the analysis to non-Gaussian measurements. Furthermore, we show how the algorithm can be
generalized to recover a signal vector x∗ efficiently given geometric prior information other than
sparsity.
1
Introduction
1.1
Phase retrieval and sparse phase retrieval
The phase retrieval problem is that of solving a system of quadratic equations
|hai , xi2 | = yi ,
i = 1, 2, . . . , m
(1.1)
where ai ∈ Rn (or Cn ) are known sampling vectors, yi > 0 are observed measurements, and x ∈ Rn
(or Cn ) is the decision variable. Over the last half a decade, there has been great interest in constructing and analyzing algorithms with provable guarantees, with much success in the case where
the sampling vectors are independently drawn from either a real or complex standard Gaussian
distribution. The notable approaches include lifting and convex relaxation (PhaseLift) [9], convex
relaxation in the natural parameter space (PhaseMax ) [16, 3, 17], gradient descent [8, 10, 35, 32],
stochastic gradient descent [29, 20], and prox-linear methods [14]. The best of these methods
have been proved to accurately recover the true underlying signal x∗ so long as the number of
measurements m is proportional to the signal dimension n.
Naturally, researchers have tried to replicate this success in the high-dimensional regime. In this
setting, it is assumed that the true signal x∗ is s-sparse, and one would like to estimate x∗ accurately
with much fewer measurements than the ambient dimension, in analogy with what is possible for
sparse linear regression. Work in this direction has mostly comprised straightforward adaptations of
∗
Department of Mathematics, University of Michigan, [email protected].
1
algorithms for unconstrained phase retrieval: Both PhaseLift and PhaseMax have been be adapted
by adding l1 regularizers to their respective objective functions [25, 18]. Meanwhile, the gradient
descent schemes Truncated Wirtinger Flow and Truncated Amplitude Flow have been adapted to
alternate gradient steps with either soft- or hard-thresholding [6, 33, 28]. These methods have been
mostly shown to accurately recover x∗ with sample complexity m = O∗ (s2 ).
1.2
Single index models and model agnostic recovery
Phase retrieval is an example of a single index model. In this more general setting, the measurements
and the sampling vectors are related by the formula
f (hai , x∗ i) = yi ,
i = 1, 2, . . . , m
(1.2)
where f is a (possibly random) link function. Such models have been studied for some time in
the statistics community (see [21] and the references therein). Classically, it is assumed that the
link function f is unknown to the observer, and it is of interest to estimate both x∗ (the index
parameter) and f . Standard theoretical results in this body of work include asymptotic minimax
rates of various estimators.
In this paper, we take a slightly different approach to the problem. We continue to assume
that f is unknown, but now treat x∗ as the only parameter of interest. On the other hand, we are
interested in algorithms that are provably efficient from both a statistical as well as a computational
point of view. Furthermore, we want our algorithms to be able to exploit a sparsity prior and
thus work in the high-dimensional regime. The motivation for such an approach comes from the
observation that real data almost never obeys a precise algebraic relationship. In other words, the
neat relationships we postulate, such as (1.1), are often misspecified.
Recently, Plan and Vershynin [27] made significant progress on this problem in the setting of
misspecified linear regression. They showed that if Cov(g, f (g)) 6= 0, then the standard Lasso
algorithm for sparse linear regression is able to estimate x∗ accurately up to scaling, and with a
sample complexity of O(s log n), the same order as that in the case of no model misspecification.
Here, g ∼ N(0, 1) is a standard Gaussian random variable.
In the misspecified phase retrieval (MPR) setting, the first work was done by Neykov, Wang
and Liu [24]. They proposed a two stage algorithm that works as follows. First, they form the
reweighted sample covariance matrix
m
Σ̂ :=
1 X
yi (ai aTi − In ),
m
(1.3)
i=1
and apply the standard SDP relaxation of Sparse PCA to this matrix. Next, they use the leading
eigenvector of the solution to formulate a Lasso-type program. The solution to this program is
their final estimate. The assumptions they make are that
µ = µ(g, f ) := Cov(g2 , f (g)) > 0,
kf (g)kψ1 ≤ C,
(Af,g )
under which, they were able to prove that the algorithm recovers x∗ accurately when given m =
O∗ (s2 ) independent standard Gaussian sampling vectors. Again, this is the same order as the
guarantees for sparse phase retrieval in the case of no misspecification.
2
1.3
Contributions
The contribution of this short paper is twofold. First, we prove that Sparse PCA, the first step
of the algorithm proposed in [24], suffices to recover the signal vector x∗ accurately with the same
sample complexity as the full two-step algorithm given in their paper. We provide a simplified and
more flexible analysis that is adapted from [26]. This analysis has the further benefit of generalizing
to the case where the prior assumption on x∗ is not that it is sparse, but that it lies in a geometric
set K.
Second, we provide a guarantee for Sparse PCA to recover x∗ accurately when the sampling
vectors are not Gaussian, but are instead drawn from distributions with independent subgaussian
entries. In particular, we show that the method works for Rademacher random variables. Although
this is a realistic sampling model, to our knowledge, it has not been analyzed in any prior work
on phase retrieval. This guarantee requires two conditions. Unsurprisingly, we require the link
function f to satisfy a correlation condition similar to (Af,g ), but adapted to the given subgaussian
distribution. Second, we require x∗ to have entries of equal magnitude over its support. This
second condition is relatively stringent, but can probably be relaxed in future work.
1.4
Notation
We shall use boldface letters to denote vectors and matrices. If A and B are real matrices of the
same dimensions, we let hA, Bi := Tr(AT B) denote the standard inner product. kAk and kAkF
will denote the operator and Frobenius norm of A respectively, while kAk1 and kAk∞ will denote
the entrywise l1 and l∞ norms respectively. For a random variable X and α > 0, we let kXkψα
denote its ψα norm.1 If a is a random vector, then ai refers to an i-th independent copy of a, while
(a)i refers to the i-th coordinate of a. C and c are used to denote constants that may change from
line to line.
2
Main results
We shall work with the single index model (1.2). We assume that the sampling vectors a1 , . . . , am
are independent copies of a random vector a satisfying the following distributional assumption:
Assumption 2.1 (Sampling vector distribution). The coordinates of a are independent copies of a
random variable Z that is centered, symmetric, of unit variance, and with subgaussian norm kZkψ2
bounded by an absolute constant C.
For convenience, we shall hide the dependence on C in our results and in our analysis. We do
not assume that we know the link function f . The algorithm we propose to estimate x∗ is the
following.
1
This is a tail decay condition. For more information, see Appendix A.
3
Algorithm 1 Sparse PCA for MPR
Input: Measurements y1 , . . . , ym , sampling vectors a1 , . . . , am , sparsity level s.
Output: An estimate x̂ for x∗ .
1: Compute Σ̂ as defined in (1.3).
2: Let X̂ be the solution to
max hX, Σ̂i subject to
X0
3:
Tr(X) = 1, kXk1 ≤ s.
(2.1)
Let x̂ be the leading eigenvector to X̂.
This program is precisely the SDP relaxation of Sparse PCA proposed by d’Aspremont et al.
[11] and later analyzed by Amini and Wainwright [1] and Berthet and Rigollet [5]. These two papers
analyzed the performance of the algorithm as applied to sparse principal component detection in
the spiked covariance model. Since the matrix Σ̂ does not follow this model a priori, one requires
further analysis to show that the algorithm succeeds.
In [24], the authors propose using the Lagrangian version of this program as the first step of their
algorithm. Their analysis (see Lemma C.1. therein) shows that when the sampling vectors follow
a Gaussian distribution, one can obtain a constant error approximation to x∗ using O(s2 log n)
samples. Using our methods, we prove a stronger version of this guarantee.
Theorem 2.2 (Sparse recovery for Gaussian measurements). Suppose a is a standard Gaussian in
Rn , and suppose Assumption (Af,g ) holds. Then there is an absolute constant C such that for any
s-sparse, unit norm signal x∗ and any ǫ, δ > 0, the output x̂ to Algorithm 1 satisfies kx̂ − x∗ k2 ≤ ǫ
with probability at least 1 − δ so long as the sample size m satisfies
)
(
s2 log(n/δ) + log4 (s/δ) s log(n/δ)
.
, ,
m ≥ C max
µ(f, g)2 ǫ4
δ log2 m
Although this result is not entirely novel, we prove it in a different way compared to [24]. This
method is simple and amenable to generalization to the situation where the sampling vectorsP
are not
1
Gaussian. In the non-Gaussian case, we first fix the the sparsity parameter s. Let Z̄s := s si=1 Zi
and rs,Z := (Z1 − Z̄s , . . . , Zs − Z̄s ) denote the mean of s independent copies of Z and the vector of
residuals respectively. With this notation, we make the assumption:
√
√
(Af,Z,s )
µ(f, Z, s) := Cov(( sZ̄s )2 , f ( sZ̄s )) > 0,
√
√
2
σ(f, Z, s) := Cov(krs,Z k2 , f ( sZ̄s )) ≤ 0, kf ( sZ̄s )kψ1 ≤ C.
Furthermore, we say that a unit norm signal vector x∗ is admissible if it has entries of equal
magnitude across its support. In other words, there is a index set I ⊂ [n] of cardinality |I| ≤ s,
such that
± √1
j∈I
|I|
(x∗ )j =
0
otherwise.
Using this definition, we have the following analogue of Theorem 2.2.
4
Theorem 2.3 (Sparse recovery for non-Gaussian measurements). There is an absolute constant
C such that the following holds. Fix a sparsity parameter s, suppose x∗ is admissible and suppose
Assumption (Af,Z,s ) holds. Then for any ǫ, δ > 0, the output x̂ to Algorithm 1 satisfies kx̂−x∗ k2 ≤ ǫ
with probability at least 1 − δ so long as the sample size m satisfies
Cs2 log(n/δ) + log4 (s/δ)
Cs C log(n/δ)
.
(2.2)
+
+
m≥
2
4
µ(f, Z, s) ǫ
δ
log2 m
Note that when Z is standard Gaussian, Assumption (Af,Z,s ) reduces to Assumption (Af,g ). To
√
see this, observe that for any s, sZ̄ is a standard Gaussian random variable, while σ(f, g, s) = 0 by
the independence property of orthogonal Gaussian marginals. This fact points to the assumption
being the right generalization of (Af,g ).
Furthermore, it is intuitive that the second condition should hold whenever Z has a reasonable
distribution and when µ(f, Z, s) > 0: if f is positively correlated with the magnitude of Z̄, then it
should be negatively correlated with the norm of the residual vector. Indeed, this can be shown to be
true whenever Z is a Rademacher random variable. We thus have a simpler result for Rademacher
random variables:
Corollary 2.4 (Sparse recovery for Rademacher measurements). There is an absolute constant C
such that the following holds. Fix a sparsity parameter s, suppose x∗ is admissible, let Z denote
√
a Rademacher random variable. Suppose µ(f, Z, s) > 0 and kf ( sZ̄s )kψ1 ≤ C. Then for any
ǫ, δ > 0, the output x̂ to Algorithm 1 satisfies kx̂ − x∗ k2 ≤ ǫ with probability at least 1 − δ so long
as the sample size m satisfies (2.2).
In the Gaussian setting, the recovery guarantee continues to hold even if we relax our constraint
√
on x∗ slightly and instead assume that kx∗ k1 ≤ s. This condition is geometric: it can equivalently
√
expressed as x∗ ∈ K, where K = sB1n is the l1 norm ball. It is thus an interesting theoretical
question to ask whether one can construct efficient algorithms for estimating x∗ that exploit prior
knowledge that x∗ ∈ K for a general convex set K.
There has been some work on proving statistical efficiency guarantees for various algorithms.
In the misspecified linear regression setting, Plan and Vershynin showed that the K-Lasso succeeds whenever the number of measurements m is of the order w(K)2 , where w(K) denotes the
Gaussian width of K [27]. In the phase retrieval setting, Soltanolkotabi showed that Projected
Amplitude Flow also succeeds whenever m & w(K)2 . On the other hand, it is hard to remark on
the computational efficiency of these methods, because this depends on the properties of the set K.
The final main result of this paper is a guarantee of a similar spirit.
Theorem 2.5 (Recovery using general geometric constraints). Suppose x∗ xT∗ ∈ K, where K is a
convex subset of the space of unit trace PSD matrices in Rn×n . Suppose a is a standard Gaussian
in Rn , and suppose Assumption Af,g holds. Then for any ǫ, δ > 0, the output x̂ to Algorithm 2
satisfies kx̂ − x∗ k2 ≤ ǫ with probability at least 1 − δ so long as the sample size m satisfies
C w(K)2 + log4 (1/δ) + log m(γ1 (K, k·k) + log(1/δ))
C
(2.3)
+ .
m≥
2
4
µ(f, g) ǫ
δ
Here, w(K) and γ1 (K, k·k) respectively denote the Gaussian width of K and its γ1 -functional with
respect to the operator norm, while C is a universal constant.
5
Organization of paper and outline of proof strategy
We prove Theorem 2.2 and Theorem 2.3 in Section 3. The strategy we take comprises two steps.
First, we compute the expected objective function used in Algorithm 1, and show that it has sufficient curvature on the feasible set around the ground truth matrix, x∗ xT∗ . This shows that feasible
solutions having large expected objective value must also be close to x∗ xT∗ . This computation is
done in Section 4.
Next, we argue that the empirical objective function is uniformly close to the expected objective
function with high probability, so that a solution to the SDP program actually has large expected
objective value. This is proved in Section 5. Finally, we use the same strategy for Theorem 2.5, but
replace the objective function concentration analysis with a more sophisticated chaining argument.
Due to its more technical nature, we defer the details to Appendix B.
3
Proof of results for sparse recovery
Proof of Theorem 2.2. Let X be the solution to Algorithm 1. Since x∗ xT∗ is also feasible for the
program, we have by optimality that
0 ≤ hX − x∗ xT∗ , Σ̂i = hX − x∗ xT∗ , Σi + hX − x∗ xT∗ , Σ̂ − Σi.
(3.1)
Using Lemma 4.3, the first term satisfies the bound
hX − x∗ xT∗ , Σi ≤ −
µ(f, g)
kx∗ xT∗ − Xk2F .
2
For the second term, we use Hölder’s inequality to write
hX − x∗ xT∗ , Σ̂ − Σi ≤ X − x∗ xT∗
1
kΣ̂ − Σk∞ .
Next, we have by assumption that
x∗ xT∗ 1
=
m
X
|(x∗ )i (x∗ )j | = kx∗ k21 ≤ s.
i,j=1
Meanwhile, by construction, we also know that kXk1 ≤ s. Rearranging (3.1), we therefore get
µ(f, g)
kx∗ xT∗ − Xk2F ≤ 2skΣ̂ − Σk∞ .
2
Using Proposition 5.1 to bound the right hand side, we get
p
Cs
log(n/δ) + log2 (s/δ)
√
.
kx∗ xT∗ − Xk2F ≤
µ(f, g) m
If x̂ denotes the leading eigenvector of X, we use Davis-Kahan’s eigenvector perturbation theorem [12] to conclude that kx̂ − x∗ k22 satisfies the same bound. Finally, we plug in our assumption
on m to show that this bound is less than ǫ2 .
Proof of Theorem 2.3. Exactly the same as for the Theorem 2.2.
6
√
Proof of Corollary 2.4. Observe that krs,Z k22 + ( sZ̄s )2 = kak22 = s. We have
√
σ(f, Z, s) = Cov(f ( sZ̄s ), krs,Z k22 )
√
√
= Cov(f ( sZ̄s ), s − ( sZ̄s )2 )
√
√
= −Cov(f ( sZ̄s ), ( sZ̄s )2 ) = µ(f, Z, s).
The corollary now follows from Theorem 2.3.
4
Objective function in expectation
In this section, we compute expressions for the expected reweighted covariance matrix Σ = EΣ̂.
Note that we may also write
Σ = Ey(aaT − In ).
Lemma 4.1 (Expected covariance for Gaussian distribution). Suppose a ∼ N(0, In ). Then for any
x∗ ∈ S n−1 , we have
Σ = µ(f, g)x∗ xT∗ .
Proof. Decompose a = ha, x∗ ix∗ +a⊥ , where a⊥ is the projection of a to the orthogonal complement
of x∗ . Using this, we write
E{yaaT } = E{f (ha, x∗ i)(ha, x∗ ix∗ + a⊥ )(ha, x∗ ix∗ + a⊥ )T }
= E{f (ha, x∗ i)ha, x∗ i2 x∗ xT∗ } + E{f (ha, x∗ i)a⊥ (a⊥ )T }
+ E{f (ha, x∗ i)ha, x∗ ix∗ (a⊥ )T } + E{f (ha, x∗ i)ha, x∗ ia⊥ xT∗ }.
Because a is a standard Gaussian, ha, x∗ i and a⊥ are independent. This means that the third and
fourth terms in this sum are zero. Furthermore, the second term can be written as the product of
two expectations E{f (ha, x∗ i)} and E{a⊥ (a⊥ )T }. We now use standard computations for Gaussians
to continue writing
E{y(aaT − In )} = E{f (g)g 2 }x∗ xT∗ + E{f (g)}(In − x∗ xT∗ ) + E{f (g)}In
= µ(f, g)x∗ xT∗ .
This completes the proof.
Lemma 4.2 (Expected covariance for non-Gaussian distributions). Suppose a is a random vector
in Rn that satisfies Assumption 2.1. Let 2 ≤ s ≤ n be an integer, and let x∗ be an admissible signal
vector. We have
σ(f, Z, s)
(PI − x∗ xT∗ ).
Σ = µ(f, Z, s)x∗ xT∗ −
s−1
c
Proof. Let PI and P⊥
I denote the orthogonal projections to the coordinates in I and I respectively.
Then PI a and P⊥
I a are independent. Using a similar calculation as in the previous lemma, we see
⊥
⊥
⊥
that PI ΣP⊥
=
P
I
I ΣPI = PI ΣPI = 0. We may hence assume WLOG that s = n and I = [n]. By
the symmetry of the distribution of a, we may also assume that x∗ = √1n , where 1 is the all ones
vector.
7
Next, notice that ha, x∗ i is invariant to permutation of the coordinate indices. Meanwhile, the
distributions of a⊥ and a are both symmetric with respect to such transformations. Let Q be a
permutation matrix. Then
QΣQT = E{f (ha, x∗ i)Qa(Qa)T }
= E{f (hQa, x∗ i)Qa(Qa)T }
= E{f (ha, x∗ i)a(a)T }.
In other words, we have
QΣQT = Σ.
(4.1)
One can check that a matrix satisfying (4.1) for all permutation matrices Q must have the same
value for all diagonal entries, and the same value for all off-diagonal entries. In other words, Σ
must be of the form
1
α
(4.2)
Σ = 11T + β(In − 11T )
n
n
for some values of α and β.
Let us now compute the values of α and β using the fact that x∗ = √1n . We have
α = xT Σx∗ = µ(f, Z, n).
Next, we apply traces to (4.2) to get
α + (n − 1)β = Tr(Σ) = E{f (ha, x∗ i)Tr(aaT − In )}.
Observe further that
E{f (ha, x∗ i)Tr(aaT − In )} = E{f (ha, x∗ i)(kak22 − n)} = σ(f, Z, n) + µ(f, Z, n).
As such, we have β =
σ(f,Z,n)
n−1
as we wanted.
Lemma 4.3 (Curvature of objective function). Suppose the hypotheses of Lemma 4.1 (respectively
Lemma 4.2) hold. For any X 0 such that Tr(X) = 1, we have
hΣ, x∗ xT∗ − Xi ≥
µ
kx∗ xT∗ − Xk2F ,
2
(4.3)
where µ = µ(f, g) (respectively µ = µ(f, Z, s)).
Proof. We shall prove the case where the hypotheses of Lemma 4.2 hold. The other case is similar
and even easier. First, observe that
hΣ, x∗ xT∗ i = µ(f, Z, s)hx∗ xT∗ , x∗ xT∗ i = µ(f, Z, s)kx∗ k42 .
We also have
σ(f, Z, s)
hPI − x∗ xT∗ , Xi
s−1
σ(f, Z, s)
= µ(f, Z, s)hx∗ xT∗ , Xi +
Tr(X RI ∩x⊥ )
∗
s−1
T
≤ µ(f, Z, s)hx∗ x∗ , Xi.
hΣ, Xi = µ(f, Z, s)hx∗ xT∗ , Xi +
8
Here, the last inequality follows from the fact that X is positive semidefinite, which implies that
any partial trace has to be non-negative.
Now, the assumptions on X also imply that kXkF ≤ 1 = kx∗ k2 . We can thus combine our
calculations to get
hΣ, x∗ xT∗ − Xi ≥ µ(f, Z, s)kx∗ k42 − µ(f, Z, s)hx∗ xT∗ , Xi
µ(f, Z, s)
kx∗ xT∗ kF + kXk2F − 2hx∗ xT∗ , Xi
≥
2
µ(f, Z, s)
=
kx∗ xT∗ − Xk2F .
2
This completes the proof.
5
Concentration of objective function
The goal of this section is to prove the following concentration theorem for the reweighted sample
covariance matrix Σ̂.
Proposition 5.1 (Concentration of sample matrix). There is a universal constant C so that the
following holds. Fix a sparsity parameter s, let a be defined using Assumption 2.1. Suppose Assumption (Af,Z,s ) holds, and let x∗ be a unit norm vector. If a is non-Gaussian, further assume
that x∗ is admissible. Then for any δ > 0, we have
p
C( log(n/δ) + log2 (s/δ))
√
kΣ̂ − Σk∞ ≤
m
with probability at least 1 − δ, provided m ≥ C max{s/δ, log(n/δ) log 2 m}.
Proof. Without loss of generality, assume that the support of x∗ is contained in the first s coordinates. Let Ps denote the projection to the first s coordinates. We write
o
n
⊥
⊥
(5.1)
kΣ̂ − Σk∞ = max kPs (Σ̂ − Σ)Ps k∞ , kPs (Σ̂ − Σ)P⊥
k
,
kP
(
Σ̂
−
Σ)P
k
s ∞
s
s ∞ ,
and bound each of the terms on the right separately.
For the first term, we shall use the fact that each entry is the mean of m i.i.d. ψ1/2 random
variables (see Appendix A). This tail decay gives us a relatively strong large deviation inequality,
which we can use together with a union bound. In more detail, let 1 ≤ k, l ≤ s. Then
(Σ̂ − Σ)kl =
m
i
1 Xh
(ai )k (ai )l f (hai , x∗ i) − E{(ai )k (ai )l f (hai , x∗ i)} .
m
i=1
We now use Proposition A.6 followed by Proposition A.5 twice to get
k(a)k (a)l f (ha, x∗ i) − E{(a)k (a)l f (ha, x∗ i)}kψα . k(a)k (a)l f (ha, x∗ i)kψ1/2
. k(a)k (a)l kψ1 kf (ha, x∗ i)kψ1
. k(a)k kψ2 k(a)l kψ2 kf (ha, x∗ i)kψ1 .
9
Each of the terms in the product on the right hand side is bounded by an absolute constant by
assumption. As such, the quantity on the left is also bounded by an absolute constant. We may
thus use Proposition A.9 to see that
√
√
P{|(Σ̂ − Σ)kl | > t/ m} ≤ 2 exp(−c t)
for t > 0 large enough. Pick t ∼ log2 (s/δ). Then we can take a union bound over all s2 choices of
k and l to get
log2 (s/δ)
√
kPs (Σ̂ − Σ)Ps k∞ .
m
with probability at least 1 − δ/4.
We next bound the other two quantities in (5.1) via a conditioning argument similar to that in
[24]. The key idea is to condition on the probability 1 − δ/4 event over which the three statements
in Lemma 5.3 hold, and to observe that this event is independent of the random variables (ai )k for
1 ≤ i ≤ m, s < k ≤ n. Hence, conditioning on the event does not alter the joint distribution of this
set of random variables.
We consider a typical entry in Ps (Σ̂ − Σ)P⊥
s , which is of the form
m
1 X
(ai )k (ai )l f (hai , x∗ i),
m
i=1
1 ≤ k ≤ s, s < l ≤ n.
(5.2)
Fixing all randomness apart from (ai )l for all indices 1 ≤ i ≤ m, s < l ≤ n, we can use Hoeffding’s
inequality (Proposition
A.2) to conclude that for each l, (5.2) is a subgaussian random variable
P
2
2
with variance m12 m
(a
i=1 i )k f (hai , x∗ i) . By the second statement of Lemma 5.3, this is bounded
by C/m, so that
)
(
m
t
1 X
≤ 2 exp(−ct2 )
(5.3)
(ai )k (ai )l f (hai , x∗ i) > √
P
m
m
i=1
p
Choosing t ∼ log(n/δ) and taking a union bound over s < l ≤ n gives
r
log(n/δ)
⊥
kPs (Σ̂ − Σ)Ps k∞ .
m
with probability at least 1 − δ/4.
⊥
Finally, each entry of P⊥
s (Σ̂ − Σ)Ps is of the form
m
1 X
f (hai , x∗ i) (ai )k (ai )l − E{(ai )k (ai )l } ,
m
i=1
s < k, l ≤ n.
(5.4)
We again fix all randomness apart from (ai )l for all indices 1 ≤ i ≤ m, s < l ≤ n. Observe that
(ai )k (ai )l − E{(ai )k (ai )l }, s < k, l ≤ n, are centered subexponential random variables. We may
thus use Bernstein’s inequality (Proposition A.3) together with the second and third statements of
Lemma 5.3 to obtain the tail bound:
)
(
√
m
t
1 X
2 t m
f (hai , x∗ i) (ai )k (ai )l − E{(ai )k (ai )l } > √
≤ 2 exp −c min t ,
(5.5)
P
m
log m
m
i=1
10
Once again, choosing t ∼
p
log(n/δ) and taking a union bound over s < k, l ≤ n gives
r
log(n/δ)
⊥
,
kPs (Σ̂ − Σ)Ps k∞ .
m
with probability at least 1 − δ/4 provided that m & log(n/δ) log 2 m.
Remark 5.2. When a is a standard Gaussian, [24] gave the bound
p
C log(n/δ)
√
kΣ̂ − Σk∞ ≤
m
with roughly the same tail probability. Hence, the only price to having more distributional generality is the additional log2 (s/δ) term in the numerator.
Lemma 5.3. Let the hypotheses of Proposition 5.1 hold. There is an absolute constant C such that
the following holds. Let I denote the support of x∗ . Then for any δ > 0, so long as m ≥ Cs/δ, the
following three statements hold simultaneously with probability at least 1 − δ/4.
1.
m
X
i=1
f (hai , x∗ i)2 ≤ Cm.
2. max
k∈I
m
X
(ai )2k f (hai , x∗ i)2 ≤ Cm.
i=1
3. max f (hai , x∗ i) ≤ C log m.
1≤i≤m
Proof. By Assumption (Af,Z,s ), we know that kf (hai , x∗ i)kψ1 is bounded by an absolute constant.
As such, Proposition A.4 implies that both its second and fourth moments are also bounded.
Furthermore, we have
Var(f (hai , x∗ i)2 ) ≤ E{f (hai , x∗ i)4 } ≤ C,
where C is an absolute constant. Using Chebyshev’s inequality together with the second moment
bound, we thus get
)
(m
X
C
f (hai , x∗ i)2 ≥ m(C + t) ≤
P
.
(5.6)
mt2
i=1
We can use the same argument together with a union bound over k ∈ I to get
)
(
m
X
Cs
(ai )2k f (hai , x∗ i)2 ≥ m(C + t) ≤
P max
.
k∈I
mt2
(5.7)
i=1
Finally, we again use the union bound and the subexponential tail bound to get
P max f (hai , x∗ i) ≥ t log m ≤ 2m exp(−ct log m) = 2m1−ct .
1≤i≤m
(5.8)
Choose t to be any fixed constant in (5.6) and (5.7), and choose t to be a constant larger than
2/c in (5). Then each of these probability bounds is of the order O(1/m), so that m & s/δ suffices
for all three statements to hold with probability at least 1 − δ/4.
11
6
Conclusion and discussion
In this paper, we have analyzed the problem of misspecified phase retrieval, and improved upon the
work of Neykov et al. in [24]. In particular, we have shown that the first stage of their algorithm
suffices for signal recovery with the same sample complexity, and extended the analysis to nonGaussian measurements. Furthermore, we showed how the algorithm can be generalized to recover
a signal vector x∗ efficiently given geometric prior information other than sparsity.
Experts in compressed sensing may have observed that while the sample complexity for algorithms for misspecified linear regression scales linearly with the sparsity parameter, our sample
complexity bounds for misspecified phase retrieval scale instead with the square of the parameter. In [24], the authors showed numerical evidence that this discrepancy is due to the statistical
inefficiency of the algorithm, and not merely a slackness in the mathematical analysis.
This s2 scaling is also observed in all other efficient algorithms for sparse phase retrieval, and
it is an open question whether there exist computationally efficient algorithms that can do better.
The authors of [24] conjecture that the answer is in the negative. This is supported by results by
Berthet and Rigollet, who show that computationally efficient algorithms for the related problem
of detecting sparse principal components, using O(s2−ǫ ) samples for any ǫ > 0, will lead to computationally efficient algorithms for solving hard instances of the planted clique problem [5, 4]. This
is widely conjectured to be impossible.
It will also be interesting to investigate whether there is slackness in the sample complexity
bound for signal recovery using general geometric constraints (Theorem 2.5). In particular, I do
not know how to bound γ1 (K, k·k) where K is the set of unit trace PSD matrices X with kXk1 ≤ s.
Hence, it is not yet clear whether Theorem 2.2 can be derived from Theorem 2.5.
Finally, the literature on high-dimensional signal recovery from non-Gaussian measurements is
still fairly limited. In this work, we have proved a recovery guarantee for admissible signal vectors
in the case of misspecified phase retrieval. Hopefully, this guarantee can be extended to larger
classes of signal vectors in the near future.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank Roman Vershynin and Shahar Mendelson for helpful discussions. Part of this
manuscript was written on a visit to UC Irvine supported by U.S. Air Force Grant FA9550-18-10031.
References
[1] Amini, A. A., and Wainwright, M. J. High-dimensional analysis of semidefinite relaxations
for sparse principal components. Annals of Statistics 37, 5 B (2009), 2877–2921.
[2] Bahmani, S., and Romberg, J. Anchored Regression: Solving Random Convex Equations
via Convex Programming. Preprint, available at http://arxiv.org/abs/1702.05327.
[3] Bahmani, S., and Romberg, J. Phase Retrieval Meets Statistical Learning Theory: A
Flexible Convex Relaxation. Preprint, available at http://arxiv.org/abs/1610.04210.
[4] Berthet, Q., and Rigollet, P. Complexity Theoretic Lower Bounds for Sparse Principal
Component Detection. JMLR: Workshop and Conference Proceedings 30, 2012 (2013), 1–21.
12
[5] Berthet, Q., and Rigollet, P. Optimal detection of sparse principal components in high
dimension. Annals of Statistics 41, 4 (2013), 1780–1815.
[6] Cai, T., Li, X., and Ma, Z. Optimal rates of convergence for noisy sparse phase retrieval
via thresholded wirtinger flow. Annals of Statistics 44, 5 (2016), 2221–2251.
[7] Candès, E. J., Li, X., and Soltanolkotabi, M. Phase retrieval from coded diffraction
patterns. Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis 39, 2 (2015), 277–299.
[8] Candès, E. J., Li, X., and Soltanolkotabi, M. Phase Retrieval via Wirtinger Flow:
Theory and Algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 61, 4 (2015), 1985–2007.
[9] Candès, E. J., Strohmer, T., and Voroninski, V. PhaseLift: Exact and stable signal
recovery from magnitude measurements via convex programming. Communications on Pure
and Applied Mathematics 66, 8 (2013), 1241–1274.
[10] Chen, Y., and Candes, E. Solving random quadratic systems of equations is nearly as easy
as solving linear systems. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 28. 2015,
pp. 739–747.
[11] D’Aspremont, A., Bach, F., and Ghaoui, L. E. Optimal Solutions for Sparse Principal
Component Analysis. Solutions 9 (2007), 1269–1294.
[12] Davis, C., and Kahan, W. M. The rotation of eigenvectors by a perturbation. III. SIAM
Journal on Numerical Analysis 7, 1 (1970), 1–46.
[13] Dirksen, S. Tail bounds via generic chaining. Electronic Journal of Probability 20 (2015),
1–29.
[14] Duchi, J. C., and Ruan, F. Solving (most) of a set of quadratic equalities: Composite
optimization for robust phase retrieval. Preprint, available at http://arxiv.org/abs/1705.02356.
[15] Ganti, R., Rao, N., Willett, R. M., and Nowak, R. Learning Single Index Models in
High Dimensions. Preprint, available at http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.08910.
[16] Goldstein, T., and Studer, C. PhaseMax: Convex Phase Retrieval via Basis Pursuit.
Preprint, available at http://arxiv.org/abs/1610.07531.
[17] Hand, P., and Voroninski, V. An Elementary Proof of Convex Phase Retrieval in
the Natural Parameter Space via the Linear Program PhaseMax. Preprint, available at
http://arxiv.org/abs/1611.03935.
[18] Hand, P., and Voroninski, V. Compressed Sensing from Phaseless Gaussian Measurements via Linear Programming in the Natural Parameter Space. Preprint, available at
http://arxiv.org/abs/1611.05985.
[19] Jaganathan, K., Oymak, S., and Hassibi, B. Sparse phase retrieval: Convex algorithms
and limitations. IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory - Proceedings (2013),
1022–1026.
13
[20] Jeong, H., and Güntürk, C. S. Convergence of the randomized Kaczmarz method for
phase retrieval. Preprint, available at http://arxiv.org/abs/1706.10291.
[21] Kuchibhotla, A. K., and Patra, R. K. Efficient Estimation in Single Index Models
through Smoothing splines. Preprint, available at https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.00145.
[22] Ledoux, M., and Talagrand, M. Probability in Banach Spaces: Isoperimetry and Processes. Springer Science & Business Media, 1991.
[23] Ma, T., and Wigderson, A. Sum-of-squares lower bounds for sparse PCA. In Advances in
Neural Information Processing Systems 28. 2015, pp. 1612–1620.
[24] Neykov, M., Wang, Z., and Liu, H. Agnostic estimation for misspecified phase retrieval
models. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 29. 2016, pp. 4089–4097.
[25] Ohlsson, H., Yang, A., Dong, R., and Sastry, S. Cprl – an extension of compressive
sensing to the phase retrieval problem. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
25. 2012, pp. 1367–1375.
[26] Plan, Y., and Vershynin, R. Robust 1-bit compressed sensing and sparse logistic regression: A convex programming approach. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 59, 1
(2013), 482–494.
[27] Plan, Y., and Vershynin, R. The generalized lasso with non-linear observations. IEEE
Transactions on Information Theory 62, 3 (2016), 1528–1537.
[28] Soltanolkotabi, M. Structured signal recovery from quadratic measurements: Breaking sample complexity barriers via nonconvex optimization.
Preprint, available at
http://arxiv.org/abs/1702.06175.
[29] Tan, Y. S., and Vershynin, R. Phase Retrieval via Randomized Kaczmarz: Theoretical
Guarantees. Preprint, available at http://arxiv.org/abs/1706.09993.
[30] van der Vaart, A. W., and Wellner, J. A. Weak Convergence and Empirical Processes.
Springer Series in Statistics. Springer New York, New York, NY, 1996.
[31] Vershynin, R.
High-Dimensional Probability.
Book draft,
https://www.math.uci.edu/~rvershyn/papers/HDP-book/HDP-book.html.
available
at
[32] Wang, G., Giannakis, G. B., and Eldar, Y. C. Solving Systems of Random Quadratic
Equations via Truncated Amplitude Flow. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 65, 8 (may
2016), 1961–1974.
[33] Wang, G., Zhang, L., Giannakis, G. B., Akcakaya, M., and Chen, J.
Sparse Phase Retrieval via Truncated Amplitude Flow.
Preprint, available at
http://arxiv.org/abs/1611.07641.
[34] Wei, K. Solving systems of phaseless equations via Kaczmarz methods: a proof of concept
study. Inverse Problems 31, 12 (Dec 2015), 125008.
[35] Zhang, H., and Liang, Y. Reshaped wirtinger flow for solving quadratic system of equations.
In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 29. 2016, pp. 2622–2630.
14
A
Results on ψα random variables
In this section, we collect some standard definitions and results on ψα random variables that help
us give streamlined proofs for our main theorems. These are collated from [22], [30], [31], and [23].
Definition A.1 (Orlicz norms). Let ψ : R+ → R+ be a convex, increasing function with ψ(0) = 0.
Define the Orlicz norm of a random variable X with respect to ψ as
kXkα := inf{λ > 0 : E{ψ(|X|/λ)} ≤ 1}.
Equipped with this norm, the space of random variables with finite norm forms a Banach space,
called an Orlicz space.
We are especially interested in the Orcliz spaces corresponding to ψα for α > 0. These are
defined as follows. When α ≥ 1, we set ψα (x) := exp(xα ) − 1. When 0 < α ≤ 1, this function is no
longer convex, so we convexify it by fiat, setting ψα (x) := exp(xα ) − 1 for x ≥ x(α) large enough,
and taking ψα to be linear on [0, x(α)]. If some random variable X has a finite ψα norm kXkψα ,
we say that it is a ψα random variable.
Readers will probably be familiar with ψ2 and ψ1 Orcliz spaces. These correspond to subgaussian
and subexponential random variables respectively (see [31] for more details). For these two classes
of random variables, we have the well-known Hoeffding’s and Bernstein’s inequalities.
Proposition A.2 (Hoeffding’s inequality). Let X1 , . . . , Xm be independent, centered, subgaussian
random variables. Then for every t ≥ 0, we have
!
)
( m
X
ct2
,
Xi ≤ 2 exp − Pm
P
2
i=1 kXi kψ2
i=1
where c > 0 is an absolute constant.
Proposition A.3 (Bernstein’s inequality). Let X1 , . . . , Xm be independent, centered, subexponential random variables. Then for every t ≥ 0, we have
)!
)
(
( m
X
t2
t
,
Xi ≤ 2 exp −c min Pm
P
2 , max kX k
i
i ψ1
i=1 kXi kψ1
i=1
where c > 0 is an absolute constant.
In this paper however, it will be useful for us to consider Orlicz spaces in full generality. This
is because we will need to work with ψ1/2 random variables, for which many of the standard
concentration inequalities do not hold. Nonetheless, we still have the following.
Proposition A.4 (Characterization of ψ1/2 RVs). Let X be a real-valued random variable. Then
the following properties are equivalent. The parameters Ci > 0 appearing in these properties differ
from each other by at most an absolute contant factor.
1. The tails of X satisfy
p
P{|X| ≥ t} ≤ 2 exp − t/C1 .
15
2. The moments of X satisfy
kXkp = (E|X|p )1/p ≤ C2 p2 .
3. The ψ1/2 norm of X satisfies
kXkψ1/2 ≤ C3 .
Proof. Same as in the case of ψ1 and ψ2 . See [31].
We have the following further properties.
Proposition A.5 (Products, Lemma 8.5 in [23]). Let X and Y be ψα random variables for some
α > 0. Then XY is a ψα/2 random variable with ψα/2 norm satisfying
kXY kψα/2 ≤ Cα kXkψα kY kψα .
Here, Cα is an absolute constant depending only on α.
Proposition A.6 (Centering). Let X be a ψα random variable for some α > 0. Then
kX − EXkψα ≤ 2kXkψα .
Proof. We have kX − EXkψα ≤ kXkψα + kEXkψα . Now check the definition of the norm to verify
that kEXkψα ≤ kXkψα .
Proposition A.7 (Sums, Theorem 6.21 in [22]). Let 0 < α ≤ 1, and let X1 , . . . , Xm be a sequence
of independent, centered ψα random variables. Then
!
m
m
X
X
Xi + max |Xi |
.
≤ Cα E
Xi
i=1
1≤i≤m
i=1
ψα
ψα
Here, Cα is an absolute constant depending only on α.
Proposition A.8 (Maxima, Lemma 2.2.2 in [30]). Let 0 < α ≤ 1, and let X1 , . . . , Xm be independent, centered ψα random variables. Then
max |Xi |
1≤i≤m
ψα
≤ Cα ψα−1 (m) max kXi kψα .
1≤i≤m
Here, Cα is an absolute constant depending only on α.
Proposition A.9 (Bernstein-type inequality for ψ1/2 RVs). Let X1 , . . . , Xm be an independent,
P
centered ψ1/2 random variables. There is an absolute contant C such that Sm := √1m m
i=1 Xi is a
ψ1/2 random variable with ψ1/2 norm satisfying
kSm kψ1/2 ≤ C max kXi kψ1/2 .
1≤i≤m
In particular, if max1≤i≤m kXi kψ1/2 is bounded above by a constant, for every t ≥ 0, we have
P{|Sm | ≥ t} ≤ 2 exp(−
16
p
t/C).
Proof. This follows more or less immediately from the last two propositions. First, notice that
2 1/2
m
m
X
X
√
Xi ≤ C m max kXi kψ1/2
Xi ≤ E
E
1≤i≤m
i=1
i=1
Here, the first inequality is an application of Jensen’s inequality, and the second uses the moment
bound in Proposition A.4. Next, we compute ψα−1 (m) = (log(m + 1))2 , and use Proposition A.8,
we get
max |Xi |
1≤i≤m
ψα
≤ C(log m)2 max kXi kψα .
1≤i≤m
Finally, plug these two bounds into the inequality given by Proposition A.7, and note that
√
log(m + 1)/ m ≤ 5. This completes the proof of the first statement. The tail bound follows from
Proposition A.4.
B
Recovery using general geometric signal constraints
The goal of this section is to prove Theorem 2.5, and to collate the necessary theoretical apparatus
for doing so. First, we state the algorithm we propose for estimating x∗ given general geometric
constraints. We call this algorithm K-PCA.
Algorithm 2 K-PCA for MPR
Input: Measurements y1 , . . . , ym , sampling vectors a1 , . . . , am .
Output: An estimate x̂ for x∗ .
1: Compute Σ̂ as defined in (1.3).
2: Let X̂ be the solution to
max hX, Σ̂i subject to X ∈ K.
X0
3:
(B.1)
Let x̂ be the leading eigenvector to X̂.
This can be seen as a tensorized version of the 1-bit sensing algorithm proposed in [26]. Our
analysis will be also be similar to that in [26], but we will require a more general concentration
result (Lemma B.3) that is derived via chaining. We introduce the requisite definitions as follows.
Let (T , d) be a metric space. A sequence T = (Tk )k∈Z+ of subsets of T is called admissible if
k
|T0 | = 1, and |Tk | ≤ 22 for all k ≥ 1. For any 0 < α < ∞, we define the γα functional of (T , d) to
be
∞
X
γα (T , d) := inf sup
2k/α d(t, Tk ).
(B.2)
T
t∈T k=0
When (T , d) is a subset of Rn with the Euclidean metric, Talagrand’s comparison theory tells us
that γ2 (T , d) ≍ w(T ), where w(T ) is the Gaussian width of T (see [22, 31]). Also note that for
any positive constant c > 0, we have γα (T, cd) = cγα (T , d). We shall use this fact later.
Now, let d1 and d2 be two metrics on T . We say that a process (Yt ) has mixed tail increments
with respect to (d1 , d2 ) if there are constants c and C such that for all s, t ∈ T , we have the bound
√
(B.3)
P(|Ys − Yt | ≥ c( ud2 (s, t) + ud1 (s, t))) ≤ Ce−u .
17
Lemma B.1 (Suprema of mixed tail processes, Theorem 5, [13]). If (Yt )t∈T has mixed tail increments, then there is a constant C such that for any u ≥ 1, with probability at least 1 − e−u ,
√
(B.4)
sup|Yt − Yt0 | ≤ C(γ2 (T , d2 ) + γ1 (T , d1 ) + udiam(T , d2 ) + udiam(T , d1 )).
t∈T
Let us return to our situation, where we have a subset K of unit trace PSD matrices in Rn×n .
Fix x∗ xT∗ , and real numbers z1 , . . . , zm . We define a process on the set K as follows. Let a1 , . . . , am
be standard Gaussians. For each X ∈ K, we set
P
T
T
YX = h m
i=1 zi (ai ai − In ), X − x∗ x∗ i.
We claim the following.
Lemma B.2 (Process increments).
The process YX has mixed tail increments with respect to
Pm 2 1/2
′
(d1 , d2 ), where d2 (X, X ) = ( i=1 zi ) kX − X′ kF , and d1 (X, X′ ) = maxi |zi | · kX − X′ k.
Proof. Fix X, X′ ∈ K, and for convenience, denote H = X − X′ . Then
YX − YX′ =
=
m
X
i=1
m
X
i=1
=
zi aTi Hai − E{aTi Hai }
zi
n
X
j=1
n
m X
X
i=1 j=1
λj hai , vj i2 − E{hai , vj i2 }
zi λj hai , vj i2 − 1 ,
P
T
where H = m
i=1 λi vi vi is the eigendecomposition of H. Next, observe that by the independence
of orthogonal Gaussian marginals, {(hai , vj i2 − 1) : 1 ≤ i ≤ m, 1 ≤ j ≤ n} are independent,
centered subexponential random variables with bounded subexponential norm. We may thus apply
Bernstein’s inequality to get
(
)!
t2
t
P{|YX − YX′ | ≥ t} ≤ 2 exp −c min Pm Pn
.
2 2,
i=1
j=1 zi λj maxi,j |zi λj |
P
Finally, observe that nj=1 zj2 = kHk2F and max1≤j≤n |zj | = kHk. One can now check that (B.3) is
satisfied with respect to our chosen d1 and d2 .
Lemma B.3 (Uniform deviation bound). Let a1 , . . . , am be independent standard Gaussians, and
suppose that Assumption (Af,g ) holds. Let K be a convex subset of the space of unit trace PSD
matrices in Rn×n . For any ǫ, δ > 0, if m satisfies the lower bound (2.3), then with probability at
least 1 − δ, we have
sup hΣ̂ − Σ, X − x∗ xT∗ i ≤ ǫ2 ,
X∈K
Proof. The proof of this concentration bound follows the same strategy as that in [27]. A priori,
the process we are trying to control has heavy tails. To overcome this, we will use a decoupling
argument together with conditioning.
18
denote projection
For each X ∈ K, denote H = X − x∗ xT∗ for convenience. Let Px∗ and Px⊥
∗
onto x∗ and its orthogonal complement respectively. We can then write
, Hi
(Σ̂ − Σ)Px⊥
(Σ̂ − Σ)Px∗ , Hi + hPx⊥
hΣ̂ − Σ, Hi = hPx∗ (Σ̂ − Σ)Px∗ , Hi + 2hPx⊥
∗
∗
∗
= hPx∗ (Σ̂ − Σ)Px∗ , Hi + 2hPx⊥
Σ̂Px∗ , Hi + hPx⊥
Σ̂Px⊥
, Hi.
∗
∗
∗
(B.5)
We shall bound the three terms on the right separately.
Recalling that Px∗ = x∗ xT∗ , we see that the first term can be written as
hPx∗ (Σ̂ − Σ)Px∗ , Hi = xT∗ (Σ̂ − Σ)x∗ xT∗ Hx∗
"
#
m
1 X
2
2
=
yi (hai , x∗ i − 1) − E{y(hai , x∗ i − 1)} xT∗ Hx∗ .
m
i=1
xT∗ Hx∗
Notice that
≤ 1. Meanwhile, the term in the square brackets is the average of independent,
centered, ψ1/2 random variables. Using Proposition A.9, we have a probability at least 1 − δ/4
event over which the following bound holds:
sup hPx∗ (Σ̂ − Σ)Px∗ , Hi ≤
X∈K
C log(1/δ)2
√
.
m
(B.6)
For the third term in (B.5), we write
m
P x⊥
Σ̂Px⊥
=
∗
∗
1 X
T
a
)(P
a
)
−
P
yi (Px⊥
⊥
⊥
i
i
x∗
x∗ .
∗
m
i=1
ai are independent, we may decouple them. In other words, we replace each ai
Since yi and Px⊥
∗
with a fully independent copy ãi . We can therefore write
D P
E
m
1
T −P
,
Hi
=
hPx⊥
Σ̂P
ã
)
ã
)(P
(P
y
⊥
⊥
⊥
⊥
i
i
i
x∗
x∗ , H
x∗
x∗
i=1
m
∗
E
D P
m
1
T − I ), P HP
y
(
ã
ã
= m
⊥
⊥
i
i
i
n
x∗
x∗
i=1
Fix the randomness with respect to a1 , . . . , am , y1 , . . . , ym , conditioning on the probability
1 − δ/4 event that the three statements in Lemma B.4 hold. With respect to the ãi ’s, Lemma B.2
shows us that this process indexed over X ∈ K has mixed tails. Furthermore, since K is a subset
of the nuclear norm ball, its diameter with respect to both the Frobenius and operator norms is
bounded by 2. Lemma B.1 then gives us another probability 1 − δ/4 event over which
m
p
C X 2 1/2
≤
,
Hi
Σ̂P
γ
(K,
k·k
)
+
y
)
sup hPx⊥
(
log(1/δ)
+ max |yi |(γ1 (K, k·k) + log(1/δ))
⊥
2
x∗
i
2
∗
1≤i≤m
m
X∈K
i=1
!
p
γ2 (K, k·k2 ) + log(1/δ) log m(γ1 (K, k·k) + log(1/δ))
√
.
(B.7)
+
≤C
m
m
Finally, for the second term in (B.5), we again decouple, writing
E
D P
m
1
T,H
a
)
y
ha
,
x
ix
(P
hPx⊥
Σ̂P
,
Hi
=
i
∗ ∗
x∗
x⊥
i=1 i i
m
∗
∗
D P
E
m
1
T,H
= m
ã
)
y
ha
,
x
ix
(P
⊥
∗ ∗
x∗ i
i=1 i i
D P
E
m
1
= m
Hx
y
ha
,
x
iã
,
P
⊥
∗ .
∗ i
x∗
i=1 i i
19
(B.8)
!
Again, fix the randomness with respect to a1 , . . . , am , y1 , . . . , ym , and remember that we have
conditioned on the event that the three statements in Lemma B.4 hold. Then with respect to the
ãi ’s, the quantity on the right in (B.8) is a centered Gaussian random variable with variance
σ2 =
m
CkHk2
1 X 2
2
2
Hx
k
y
ha
,
x
i
kP
≤
.
⊥
∗ 2
i
∗
i
x∗
m2
m
i=1
Therefore (hPx⊥
Σ̂Px∗ , Hi)X is a process indexed by X which has subgaussian increments with
∗
respect to the operator norm. We use an analogue of Theorem B.1 (see Theorem 3.2 in [13]) to
obtain a probability 1 − δ/4 event over which
!
p
γ2 (K, k·k2 ) + log(1/δ)
√
Σ̂Px∗ , Hi ≤ C
sup hPx⊥
.
(B.9)
∗
m
X∈K
Combining the bounds (B.6), (B.9), and (B.7) gives us the statement we want.
Lemma B.4. Let a1 , . . . , am be independent standard Gaussians, and suppose that Assumption
(Af,g ) holds. Then for any δ > 0, so long as m ≥ C/δ, the following three statements hold
simultaneously with probability at least 1 − δ/4.
1.
m
X
f (hai , x∗ i)2 ≤ Cm.
m
X
yi2 f (hai , x∗ i)2 ≤ Cm.
i=1
2.
i=1
3. max f (hai , x∗ i) ≤ C log m.
1≤i≤m
Proof. Exactly the same as in Lemma 5.3.
Proof of Theorem 2.5. We repeat the argument of Theorem 2.2, but replace the Hölder’s inequality
bound of hΣ̂ − Σ, X− x∗ xT∗ i therein with the uniform deviation bound supplied by Lemma B.3.
20
| 7cs.IT
|
Recursive Binary Neural Network Learning Model
with 2.28b/Weight Storage Requirement
1
Tianchan Guan 1,2, Xiaoyang Zeng2, Mingoo Seok 1
Electrical Engineering, Columbia University; 2Microelectrical Engineering, Fudan
University
{tg2569, ms4415}@columbia.edu; xyzeng@fudan edu
Abstract
This paper presents a storage-efficient learning model titled Recursive
Binary Neural Networks for sensing devices having a limited amount of
on-chip data storage such as < 100’s kilo-Bytes. The main idea of the
proposed model is to recursively recycle data storage of synaptic weights
(parameters) during training. This enables a device with a given storage
constraint to train and instantiate a neural network classifier with a larger
number of weights on a chip and with a less number of off-chip storage
accesses. This enables higher classification accuracy, shorter training time,
less energy dissipation, and less on-chip storage requirement. We verified
the training model with deep neural network classifiers and the
permutation-invariant MNIST benchmark. Our model uses only 2.28
bits/weight while for the same data storage constraint achieving ~1% lower
classification error as compared to the conventional binary-weight learning
model which yet has to use 8 to 16 bit storage per weight. To achieve the
similar classification error, the conventional binary model requires ~4×
more data storage for weights than the proposed model.
1.
Introduction
Deep Neural Networks (DNN) have demonstrated the state-of-the-art results in a wide range
of cognitive workloads such as computer version and speech recognition, achieving
better-than-human performance for the tasks often considered too complex for machines
[1-5]. The success of DNN has indeed motivated scientists and engineers to implement a
DNN in mobile and embedded devices, often dubbed as Internet of Smart Things [6-7]. The
recent works in this area however, mostly consider off-device learning [8-10], i.e., the
learning of DNN is performed in the cloud data centers consisting of many CPU and GPU
nodes and the post-learning weights are downloaded to mobile and embedded devices. This
is because those devices have insufficient computing and storage capacity to train a DNN
having millions of synapses each represented in a 32-bit floating point number.
On-chip learning, however, becomes increasingly important for the mobile and embedded
devices for the following four reasons. First, such device often benefits to have the model
that is custom-built for the device and its user and environment. This is because the model
tends to be more accurate and effective if created with considering those factors. Second, if
we cannot fit all the weights in on-chip storage we have to store them in off-chip storage
such as FLASH and DRAM. Accessing off-chip storage, however, incurs 3 to 4 orders of
magnitudes more energy and delay overhead than storage on a processor chip [15].
Uploading data onto cloud computers for training can consume even more power and
substantially increase latency [11]. On-chip learning, therefore, is a very desirable approach
for energy-efficiency and delay. Third, the training data from mobile and embedded sensing
devices can contain security-sensitive information, e.g., personal health data from wearable
medical devices. At the risk of being leaked, users typically do not want to upload such data
onto cloud computers. Finally, in the era of Internet of Things (IoT), we anticipate a drastic
increase in the number of deployed devices, which can proportionally increase the number of
learning tasks to be done in the cloud. Coupled with the complexity of learning, even for
powerful cloud computers, this can be computationally challenging tasks.
On-chip learning however entails various challenges, in algorithms, data, and systems
[12-13]. The most eminent challenges with regards to hardware systems are high
computation and data storage overhead of DNN system which can hardly be met by limited
on-chip resources. Recently, Binary Neural Network (BNN) is proposed to drastically reduce
computation complexity by using binary information of weights [16], activations [17], inputs
[18], and their combinations. Although these works substantially save computational
requirement, all these works still must maintain high-precision weights during training since
the weight update is performed in a fine-grained manner. This limits on-chip integration of
weights.
Scaling data storage requirement, however, is an urgent challenge to minimize off-chip
storage and cloud computer access. For example, a wearable tracker such as FitBit, contains
the ARM Cortex M3 processor. This processor has only 64 kilo-Byte (kB) on-chip data
storage (data cache) [14]. Even if we use all of that storage only for weights, we can
implement only 16,000 weights if each has to use 32 bits. Thus the device has to use the
non-volatile FLASH memory chip with capacity up to tens of Mega-Byte (MB) to store
synaptic weights. However, using it during learning would be prohibitive since it incurs
1,000-10,000X worse energy and delay to access them than the on-chip data storage of the
processor [15].
Our goal is, therefore, to train a neural network by efficient using a li mited amount of data
storage on a processor chip. Toward this goal, we propose a new learning model, Recursive
Binary Neural Network (RBNN). This model is based on the process of training of a neural
network, weight binarization, recycling storage of non-sign-bit portion of weights to add
more weights to enlarge the neural network for performance improvement. We recursively
perform this process until either accuracy stop improving or we use up all the storage on a
chip.
We verified the proposed RBNN model on a multi-layer perceptron (MLP)-like classifier and
the MNIST benchmark. We considered typical storage constraints of embedded sensing
devices in the order of hundreds of kB. The experiment confirms that the proposed model (i)
demonstrates ~1% classification accuracy improvement over the conventional BNN learning
model specifically following [16] for the same storage constraints or (ii) scale on-chip data
storage requirement by 4X for the same classification test error (~2.5%), marking the storage
requirement of 2.28 bits/weight. The conventional BNN model ([16] but also [17,18])
exhibits a significantly larger storage requirement of 8 to 16 bits/weight..
The remainder of the paper is as follow. In Sec. 2 we will introduce the existing works on . In
Sec. 3 we will describe our proposed model. Sec. 4 will present the experimental results and
comparisons to the conventional model. Finally, in Sec. 5, we will conclude the paper.
2.
Related Work
While DNN achieves the state-of-the-art classification accuracy in a range of cognitive tasks,
DNN is also well-known for its high computational complexity and storage requirement. The
high storage requirement of DNN has motivated active researches to mitigate it both in
learning and inference processes. Particularly many of the researches focus on synaptic
weights as the high storage requirement often lies in and around them conventionally
represented in 32-bit floating-point numbers.
2.1.
Synaptic weight compression
Compressing weights is one of the approaches to reduce storage requirement in deployment .
Several researches show that the eights of DNN contain a large amount of redundancy, which
can be exploited by compression. Well-known compression algorithms such as hash function
[19] and Huffman code [20] have been applied to compress weights in DNN, achieving a
large amount of storage savings as high as 49× [20]. However, these approaches must
compress weights only after finishing training, thus cannot scale storage requirement for
learning. Furthermore, it requires a decompression process of weights before performing
inference operation, incurring a considerable amount of additional computing complexity.
2.2.
Synaptic weights precision reduction
Another approach is to reduce the precision of synaptic weights. Several studies have
demonstrated lowering the precision of weights (i.e., quantization) has a tolerable impact on
the performance of DNN [21,22]. Some studies even showed that the noise introduced by the
quantization process can help improving performance [22]. In Ref. [21], the authors trained a
DNN having 16-bit fixed-point weights with the proposed stochastic rounding technique, and
demonstrated little to no degradation in classification accuracy. In Ref. [22], the authors
proposed the dynamic fixed-point representation (i.e., dynamically changing the position of
decimal point over computation sequences) to further reduce the precision requirement down
to 10 bits per synapse. These techniques help to reduce storage requirement and replace
complex floating-point arithmetic with simple fixed-point one.
2.3.
Binary Neural Network
Recent works proposed to use binary information of weights [16], activations [17,18], and
even inputs [18] for some parts of learning and post-learning operations of neural networks.
This replaces a good number of real-number multiplications with sign-inversion, shift, and
XNOR operations, largely reducing computational complexity. However, all of these BNN
approaches must store high-precision weights and cannot scale storage requirement of
weights during learning because it is needed to tune weights in a fine-grained manner.
3.
RBNN Model
3.1.
Key idea
Intuitively, our RBNN model is inspired by the difference between precision requirement of
weights for BNN training and inference. To shed light with this difference, Table I shows
which parts of weights are used in each step of training. The conventional BNN works [16-18]
can use only sign bits of weights during multiply-and-accumulate (MAC) in both forward
and back propagations. However the weight update is done in high -precision. This requires to
store all bits of weights during learning i.e., no scaling in storage savings.
Table I Comparisons of weight information usage in BNNs and RBNN
Steps
MAC in forward prop.
BNN [16-18]
Sign bits of weights
Proposed RBNN
Sign bits of weights
MAC in back prop.
Sign bits of weights
Sign bits of weights
Weight update
All bits of weights
All bits of weights
Recursive recycling
N/A
Keep sign bits and recycle
storages of the other bits
for more plastic weights
However, it has been known that once trained we can use only sign bits of weights to perform
inference at a reasonably small accuracy penalty [16-18]. This vast different requirement of
weight precision between learning and post-learning inspires us to create our RBNN model.
As shown in the third column in Table I, like BNN [16-18], we also use sign bits for MAC
operations to reduce computational complexity. The main difference is that after keeping
only the sign bits after learning (called binarization), we recycle storages that used to store
non-sign bits of weights and add more weights to the neural network. We perform this
process recursively, which makes the neural networks larger and more accurate but using the
same amount of storage.
Figure 1 depicts the process of our proposed RBNN learning model with an example
fully-connected neural network. In the beginning the neural network has one input, two
hidden, and one output neurons with four weights each of which has n bits. We first train this
1 × 2 × 1 network using the conventional back-propagation algorithm. After that, as
conventional BNN training method does, we binarize all the weights, i.e., discarding all bits
except the sign bit, resulting in a 1 × 2 × 1 trained network with binary weights (trained
BNN). Then we continue the second iteration of training (the middle of Fig. 1): specifically,
we recycle the storage that used to store the n-1 non-sign bits of synapses in previous
network. Using this storage, we add four weights each of which is now (n-1) bits to the just
trained network, expanding the network to 1 × 4 × 1. This network has four weights that are
trained (non-plastic, marked as solid lines) and four weights that can be trained (plastic,
marked as dash lines), and we train only those four plastic weights using back-propagation
algorithm.
W13
W11
W12
Wb13
Wb11
W14
Wb12
Wb14
W21
W23
Wk1
Wk3
W24
W22
Wk2
Wk4
W11
Wb11
W21
Wb11 Wb21
...
Wk1
W12
Wb12
W22
Wb12 Wb22
...
Wk2
W13
Wb13
W23
Wb13 Wb23
...
Wk3
W14
Wb14
W24
Wb14 Wb24
...
n-bit
1-bit
(n-1)-bit
1-bit 1-bit
Wk4
(n-k+1)bit
Figure 1: RBNN learning model with an example neural network. The recursive operation
increases the number of weights in the neural network (top) while using the same amount of
storage for weights (bottom)
We repeat the same process of binarization and recycling, and after the k-times iterations the
network becomes 1 × 2 ∙ k × 1 with 4 ∙ k binary weights, k times more weights than the
first network. However, the storage for weights we need to use did not grow over the
iterations, scaling the storage requirement per weight to n/k (=4∙n/4∙k), again k times better
than the first network. Thus the proposed RBNN either can achieve better classification
accuracy - enabled by the more number of weights - or reduce weight storage requirement to
achieve the same performance level.
3.2.
Model details
Figure 2 depicts the details of the RBNN model. The left part of Figure depicts the flow chart
of RBNN model, while left part explains the function of each stage. In the beginning of the
training procedure, conventional BNN training algorithm BNN_Training is used to train a BNN.
After training, we got a trained BNN with binary synaptic weights. As a result, the synaptic
bit-width is reduced by 1. And then we use the rest synaptic bits are used as weights of
incremental
BNN.
After
training
the
incremental
BNN
with
algorithm
Incremental_BNN_Training, the performance of the enlarged BNN is tested. If the performance
doesn’t stop improving and there are still available synaptic bits after weight binarzation, the rest
synaptic bits will be reused to further enlarge current trained BNN.
The method Incremental_BNN_Training is designed to train the incremental BNN to improve
performance of previously trained BNN. To meet this goal, the conventional BNN training
method is adjusted as follows:
Feedforward: The outputs of enlarged BNN computed through adding outputs of both
trained BNN and incremental BNN. As shown in Figure1, there’re no connections between
trained BNN and incremental BNN. So the outputs of each hidden layer in the two networks
are calculated separately.
Backpropagation & Parameter update: The output layer’s activation gradient only
back-propagates to incremental BNN. And only synaptic weights in incremental BNN are
updated.
BNN_Training
BNN_Training: Training initial
conventional BNN training method.
BNN
using
Bit_width_Reduction
Bit-width_Reduction: Reduce bit-width of all
synaptic weights by 1
Incremental_BNN_Training
Incremental_BNN_Training:
Training incremental BNN with previously Trained
BNN
Performance_evaluation: Test the performance of
trained enlarged BNN
Performance_evaluation
Stop criteria met?
TRUE
END
FALSE
Stop criteria: When the performance stops
improving or improves too slowly with synaptic
bits reuse, the process should stop.
Figure 2: Detail of Training Method for RBNN Model
To sum up, the trained BNN is only used to calculate output of the enlarged network in
feedforward stage. The parameters of trained BNN won’t change when training incremental
BNN. This ensures convergence of training of the enlarged BNN. The weights in trained BNN
are binary, so it can only capture small partition of the weight updates because most of them
have very small amount. Therefore, if we update trained BNN, it is very likely that the
algorithm will not converge to a minimum of the cost function. On the oth er hand, the
weights of incremental BNN have relatively high precision during training and thus can
capture most of the weights update.
Only updating incremental BNN can reduce the cost function of the enlarged BNN is because
there’s no connections between incremental BNN and trained BNN. Therefore, when
calculating output of enlarged BNN, output of trained BNN can be considered as a constant
added to output of incremental BNN. As such, during back-propagation, trained BNN outputs
have no impact on gradient of incremental BNN because derivation of constant is zero.
Similar to the conventional BNN training algorithm [16], binary weights are used in both
feed forward and back propagation in Incremental_BNN_Training, to reduce computational
overhead. Since weights in trained BNN are binary, the multiplication related to weights can
all be simplified as shift.
Algorithm 1 Incremental_BNN_Training. C is the cost function for mini-batch,
the learning
rate and L the number of layers. The function
specifies how to binarize the weights.
and
are activation function of hidden layers and output layer, respectively.
Require: a minibatch of inputs and targets ( , ), previous weights of incremental BNN
,
weights of trained BNN
,
Ensure: updated weights of incremental BNN
{1. Forward Propagation}
{1.1 Computing outputs of hidden layers in trained BNN and incremental BNN}
for k = 1 to L-1 do
∙
(
∙
)
end for
{1.2 Computing outputs of enlarged BNN}
∙
∙
{2. Back propagation}
{Please note that only gradients of incremental BNN are computed.}
Compute
knowing
and
for k = L to 1 do
(
)
∙
∙
1
1
end for
{3 Parameter Update}
{Please note that only weights of incremental BNN are updated.}
for k = L to 1 do
∙
end for
4.
Experiment Setup
4.1.
Permutation-invariant MNIST benchmark
We used the permutation-invariant MNIST to test the performance of the proposed RBNN
model. We use the original training set of 60,000 images and the original test set of 10,000
28-by-28 pixel gray-scale images. The training and testing data 𝑥 is normalized to 𝑥𝑛𝑜𝑟𝑚
as:
𝑥𝑛𝑜𝑟𝑚
𝑥 𝑚𝑒 𝑛 𝑥
255
×2
(7)
xnorm is in the interval [-1, 1] and exhibits zero mean. Following the typical practices, we use
the last 10,000 images of the training set as a validation set for early stopping and model
selection. As we use the permutation-invariant MINST, i.e., ignoring the 2-dimentonal image
structure of the image, we did not consider convolutional computation. We also did not
consider data augmentation, pre-processing, and unsupervised pre-training during our
experiment.
4.2.
Neural network configuration and data format
We considered the storage constraints of mainly hundreds of kB based on the typical
embedded system designs [23]. We considered a feed-forward fully-connected neural
network with a single hidden layer. We considered several different numbers of neuron units
in the hidden layer ranging from 200 to 800. The numbers of the input and output units are
784 and 10, respectively. We used the tanh_opt()for the activation function of the hidden
layer and the softmax()for that of the output layer. We use the classical Stochastic Gradient
Descent (SGD) algorithm for cross-entropy minimization without momentum. We use a
small size of batch (1,000) and a single static learning rate of 0.25. We did not use other
advanced techniques such as dropout, Maxout, ADAM, and etc. for both the proposed and
the baseline learning models. We recorded the best training and test errors associated with
the best validation error after up to 1,000 epochs.
We used the fixed-point arithmetic for all the computation and data load and access. The
synaptic weight data load and access was performed strictly at the precision of the plastic
synaptic bit-width associated with the current recursive iteration BWp, e.g., N bits for the first
iteration, N-1 bits for the second iteration, et al. The intermediate computation, such as
gradient calculation, may use higher-precision fixed-point arithmetic to maintain sufficient
precision. The translation from wide fixed-point number to narrow fixed-point and binary
number is performed with simple decimation, i.e., removing less significant bits, without
using advanced techniques such as stochastic rounding. We saturated values in the event of
overflow in weight update, i.e., the value was set to the largest or smallest value which the
currently-used fixed-point format can represent.
Storage constraints: 155kB
First recursive
iteration
0.01
Test error (%)
Training error (%)
0.1
Second
1E-3
Third
1E-4
4.0
First recursive
iteration
3.5
Second
3.0
Third
Fourth
Fifth
Fifth
1E-5
109 8 7 6 5 4
Storage constraints: 155kB
Sixth
Fourth
16
4.5
3
2
Sixth
2.5
1
Weight storage efficiency
(bits/weight)
16
109 8 7 6 5 4
3
2
1
Weight storage efficiency
(bits/weight)
Figure 3: (left) Training error and (right) testing error across recursive iterations in the
proposed RBNN model. The storage constraint is 155 kB.
5.
Results and Discussion
5.1.
Accuracy improvement
Figure 3 depicts the classification errors of the proposed learning model across six recursive
iterations. The initial bit-width of weights is 16 bits. In each series of data points in Figure 3,
the leftmost point is the initial neural network, i.e., with 100 hidden units and 79,400
synapses (= 784·100+100·10). At this point, the synaptic bit efficiency, defined as the ratio
of total storage bits to the number of synapses trained with the bits, is 16 bits/synapse. Note
that this point is equivalent to the network trained with the conventional BNN model
specifically following [16]. In the second leftmost data point in the series is the neural
network after the first recursive iteration, i.e., the network with total 200 hidden units and
158,800 (=2·79,400) synapses, achieving significant reduction in error. The weight storage
requirement also improves to ~8 bits/synapse. Finally, after six recursive iterations, the
neural network implements total 700 hidden neurons and 555,800 synapses with only 155 kB
data storage, marking the storage requirement of 2.28b/synapse and the test error of ~2.6%.
5.2. Storage savings
We experimented our proposed and conventional BNN learning model [16] across different
combinations of hidden neuron counts and bits per synapse. For the conventional model, we
considered from 800 hidden neurons and 16-b synapses to 100 hidden neurons and 12-b
synapses, which correspond to 1.2 MB to 116 KB data storage requirement for synaptic
weights, respectively. For the proposed model, we considered from 200 initial hidden
neurons and initially 16 bit synapses to 100 initial hidden neurons and initially 12 bit
synapses, and performed recursive binarizations for each network. Our proposed model
requires 116kB to 310 kB data storage for synapses. Figure 4 shows the results of this
experiment: the proposed model can achieve ~1% lower test error than the conventional
model using the similar amount of storage. In addition, the conventional mode requires 3×
more data storage to achieve the similar test error with the proposed RBNN model.
Storage requirement (MB)
Table II shows the detail comparisons of the six neural networks, three from the proposed
RBNN model (R1, R2,R3) and three from the conventional BNN model (B 1, B 2, B 3) [16]. R1
and B 1 achieve the similar test error, but R1 outperforms B 1 in the storage requirement by 3×.
The downside of R 1 is the increase in computations during training: it requires more shift and
add operations, but the same number of multiplications (which is much more complex than
add and shift), as compared to the B1. The computation complexity for inference operations
are the same. Similarly, R 3 requires 4× less storage than B 2.
1.4
Proposed RSBL
Conventional BNN
[800,16]
1.2
1.0
B1
[800,12] = [hidden units, weight bitwidth]
0.8
>3X
0.6
0.4
R1
[200, 16]
0.2
[400, 16]
B2
[400, 12]
[400, 8][200, 16]
[100, 16] R2
[100, 12]
0.0
2.0
2.5
[400, 6]
[200 8]
>1%
[100, 16]
[100, 12]
[200, 6]
B3
3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5
Test error (%)
5.0
Figure 4: The storage requirement and test error trade-offs achieved by the proposed RBNN
model and the conventional BNN model. The proposed model achieves >3× storage
requirement savings for the same test error and >1% lower error for the same storage
requirement.
Table II. Detail comparisons of RBNNs and BNNs
Initial hidden neurons
R1
200
R2
100
R3
100
B1
800
B2
400
B3
200
Final hidden neurons
800
700
400
800
400
200
Final synapses
635,200
555,800
317,600
635,200
317,600
155,600
Initial weight bitwidth
16
16
12
12
12
6
Storage req (b/weight)
4
2.28
3
12
12
6
Test error (%)
2.56
2.65
2.76
2.61
2.80
3.60
Comp., learning
Shift / Multiply / Add
2,699,600
635,200
2,699,600
3,970,000
555,800
3,970,000
1,349,800
317,600
1,349,800
1,270,400
635,200
1,270,400
635,200
317,600
635,200
317,600
158,800
317,600
Comp., inference
Shift, Add
Storage requirement
635,200
635,200
310kB
555,800
555,800
155kB
317,600
317,600
116kB
635,200
635,200
930kB
317,600
317,600
465kB
158,800
158,800
114kB
6. Conclusion and Future Work
This paper presents a learning model regarding local on-device learning in sensing devices
with limited data storage. The proposed RBNN model builds upon the recent binary neural
network models and extends them by recycling data storage that would have been wasted, to
add and train more synapses to a neural network classifier. We verified the proposed model
with the neural network classifier and the permutation-invariant MNIST benchmark under
the typical embedded system storage constraints. The results show that the proposed model
achieves 2.28b/weight storage requirement while achieving ~1% better classification error as
compared to the conventional binary-weight learning model for the same storage constraint.
Our proposed model also achieves 3× less data storage than the conventional model for the
same classification error.
We expect the future work that extends the application of the learning model to other neural
network topologies and datasets. We also expect to apply the RBNN model to the ensembles
of neural networks [24-26], the mixture of experts [27-29], and the incremental learning
[27,30]. This is because the proposed learning model virtually enables to create and train
additional synapses from the just trained synapses via recursive binarizat ion and recycling.
References
[1] G. Hinton, L. Deng, D. Yu, G. E. Dahl, A. R. Mohamed, N. Jaitly, et al., (2012). Deep neural
networks for acoustic modeling in speech recognition: The shared views of four research groups. IEEE
Signal Processing Magazine, 29(6), 82-97.
[2] A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and G. Hinton. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural
networks. In NIPS’2012. 2012.
[3] Jacob Devlin, Rabih Zbib, Zhongqiang Huang, Thomas Lamar, Richard Schwartz, and John
Makhoul. Fast and robust neural network joint models for statistical machine translation. In Proc.
ACL’2014, 2014.
[4] A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, G. E. Hinton, (2012). Imagenet classification with deep convolutional
neural networks. In Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 1097-1105).
[5] R. Girshick, J. Donahue, T. Darrell, J. Malik. Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection
and semantic segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern
recognition. (2014) 580–587
[6] Smart Things. URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SmartThings
[7] G. Kortuem, F. Kawsar, V. Sundramoorthy, D. Fitton, (2010). Smart objects as building blocks for
the internet of things. IEEE Internet Computing, 14(1), 44-51.
[8] N. D. Lane, S. Bhattacharya, P. Georgiev, C. Forlivesi, L. Jiao, L. Qendro, F. Kawsar, (2016, April).
Deepx: A software accelerator for low-power deep learning inference on mobile devices. In
Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN), 2016 15th ACM/IEEE Internationa l Conference on
(pp. 1-12). IEEE.
[9] D. Shin, J. Lee, J. Lee, H. J. Yoo, (2017, February). DNPU: An 8.1 TOPS/W reconfigurable
CNN-RNN processor for general-purpose deep neural networks. In Solid-State Circuits Conference
(ISSCC), 2017 IEEE International (pp. 240-241). IEEE.
[10] S. Bang, J. Wang, Z. Li, C. Gao, Y. Kim, Q. Dong, et al., (2017, February). A 288µW
programmable deep-learning processor with 270KB on-chip weight storage using non-uniform
memory hierarchy for mobile intelligence. In Solid-State Circuits Conference (ISSCC), 2017 IEEE
International (pp. 250-251). IEEE.
[11] Z. Jiang, C. Bae, J. Kang, S. J. Kim, M. Seok, “Microwatt End-to-End Digital Neural Signal Processing
Systems for Motor Intention Decoding,” IEEE Design, Automation, and Test in Europe (DATE), 2017
[12] J. Roschelle, (2003). Keynote paper: Unlocking the learning value of wireless mobile devices.
Journal of computer assisted learning, 19(3), 260-272.
[13] D. Vogel, D. Kennedy, R.C.W. Kwok, (2009). Does using mobile device applications lead to
learning?. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 20(4), 469.
[14] J. Yiu, (2009). The definitive guide to the ARM Cortex-M3. Newnes.
[15] W. A. Wulf, and S. A. McKee. "Hitting the memory wall: implications of the obvious." ACM
SIGARCH computer architecture news 23, no. 1 (1995): 20-24.
[16] M. Courbariaux, Y. Bengio, J. P. David, (2015). Binaryconnect: Training deep neural networks
with binary weights during propagations. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (pp.
3123-3131).
[17] M. Courbariaux, I. Hubara, D. Soudry, R. El-Yaniv, Y. Bengio, (2016). Binarized neural networks:
Training deep neural networks with weights and activations constrained to+ 1 or-1. arXiv preprint
arXiv:1602.02830.
[18] M. Rastegari, V. Ordonez, J. Redmon, A. Farhadi, (2016, October). Xnor-net: Imagenet
classification using binary convolutional neural networks. In European Conference on Computer
Vision (pp. 525-542). Springer International Publishing.
[19] W. Chen, J. Wilson, S. Tyree, K. Weinberger, Y. Chen, (2015, June). Compressing neural networks
with the hashing trick. In International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 2285-2294).
[20] S. Han, H. Mao, W. J. Dally, (2015). Deep compression: Compressing deep neural networks with
pruning, trained quantization and huffman coding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1510.00149.
[21] S. Gupta, A. Agrawal, K. Gopalakrishnan, P. Narayanan, (2015, July). Deep Learning with
Limited Numerical Precision. In ICML (pp. 1737-1746).
[22] M. Courbariaux, Y. Bengio, J.P. David, (2014). Training deep neural networks with low precision
multiplications. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.7024.
[23] W. T. Shiue, C. Chakrabarti, (1999, June). Memory exploration for low power, embedded systems.
In Proceedings of the 36th annual ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (pp. 140-145). ACM.
[24] Z. H. Zhou, J. Wu, W. Tang, (2002). Ensembling neural networks: many could be better than all.
Artificial intelligence, 137(1-2), 239-263.
[25] L. K. Hansen, P. Salamon, (1990). Neural network ensembles. IEEE transactions on pattern
analysis and machine intelligence, 12(10), 993-1001.
[26] G. Giacinto, F. Roli, (2001). Design of effective neural network ensembles for image
classification purposes. Image and Vision Computing, 19(9), 699-707.
[27] N. Shazeer, A. Mirhoseini, K. Maziarz, A. Davis, Q. Le, G. Hinton, J. Dean, (2017). Outrageously
large neural networks: The sparsely-gated mixture-of-experts layer. arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.06538.
[28] D. J. Miller, H. S. Uyar, (1997). A mixture of experts classifier with learning based on both
labelled and unlabelled data. Advances in neural information processing systems, 571-577.
[29] M. Enzweiler, D. M. Gavrila, (2011). A multilevel mixture-of-experts framework for pedestrian
classification. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 20(10), 2967-2979.
[30] T. Xiao, J. Zhang, K. Yang, Y. Peng, Z. Zhang, (2014, November). Error-driven incremental
learning in deep convolutional neural network for large-scale image classification. In Proceedings of
the 22nd ACM international conference on Multimedia (pp. 177-186). ACM.
| 9cs.NE
|
Deep Hyperspherical Learning
Weiyang Liu1 , Yan-Ming Zhang2 , Xingguo Li3,1 , Zhiding Yu4 , Bo Dai1 , Tuo Zhao1 , Le Song1
Georgia Institute of Technology 2 Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences
3
University of Minnesota 4 Carnegie Mellon University
{wyliu,tourzhao}@gatech.edu, [email protected], [email protected]
arXiv:1711.03189v5 [cs.LG] 30 Jan 2018
1
Abstract
Convolution as inner product has been the founding basis of convolutional neural
networks (CNNs) and the key to end-to-end visual representation learning. Benefiting from deeper architectures, recent CNNs have demonstrated increasingly
strong representation abilities. Despite such improvement, the increased depth and
larger parameter space have also led to challenges in properly training a network.
In light of such challenges, we propose hyperspherical convolution (SphereConv),
a novel learning framework that gives angular representations on hyperspheres.
We introduce SphereNet, deep hyperspherical convolution networks that are distinct from conventional inner product based convolutional networks. In particular,
SphereNet adopts SphereConv as its basic convolution operator and is supervised
by generalized angular softmax loss - a natural loss formulation under SphereConv.
We show that SphereNet can effectively encode discriminative representation and
alleviate training difficulty, leading to easier optimization, faster convergence and
comparable (even better) classification accuracy over convolutional counterparts.
We also provide some theoretical insights for the advantages of learning on hyperspheres. In addition, we introduce the learnable SphereConv, i.e., a natural
improvement over prefixed SphereConv, and SphereNorm, i.e., hyperspherical
learning as a normalization method. Experiments have verified our conclusions.
1
Introduction
Recently, deep convolutional neural networks have led to significant breakthroughs on many vision
problems such as image classification [9, 18, 19, 6], segmentation [3, 13, 1], object detection [3, 16],
etc. While showing stronger representation power over many conventional hand-crafted features,
CNNs often require a large amount of training data and face certain training difficulties such as
overfitting, vanishing/exploding gradient, covariate shift, etc. The increasing depth of recently
proposed CNN architectures have further aggravated the problems.
To address the challenges, regularization techniques such as dropout [9] and orthogonality parameter
constraints [21] have been proposed. Batch normalization [8] can also be viewed as an implicit
regularization to the network, by normalizing each layer’s output distribution. Recently, deep
residual learning [6] emerged as a promising way to overcome vanishing gradients in deep networks.
However, [20] pointed out that residual networks (ResNets) are essentially an exponential ensembles
of shallow networks where they avoid the vanishing/exploding gradient problem but do not provide
direct solutions. As a result, training an ultra-deep network still remains an open problem. Besides
vanishing/exploding gradient, network optimization is also very sensitive to initialization. Finding
better initializations is thus widely studied [5, 14, 4]. In general, having a large parameter space is
double-edged considering the benefit of representation power and the associated training difficulties.
Therefore, proposing better learning frameworks to overcome such challenges remains important.
In this paper, we introduce a novel convolutional learning framework that can effectively alleviate
training difficulties, while giving better performance over dot product based convolution. Our idea
31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2017), Long Beach, CA, USA.
w θ(w,x) x
g(θ(w,x) ) SphereConv
SphereConv
Operator
Operator
...
w3
...
x
x
...
SphereConv
Operator
x
...
w1
x
SphereConv
Operator
x
...
...
x
w2
Cross-entropy
w4
Softmax
x
x
x
Hyperspherical Convolutions
Generalized Angular
Softmax Loss
Figure 1: Deep hyperspherical convolutional network architecture.
is to project parameter learning onto unit hyperspheres, where layer activations only depend on
the geodesic distance between kernels and input signals1 instead of their inner products. To this
end, we propose the SphereConv operator as the basic module for our network layers. We also
propose softmax losses accordingly under such representation framework. Specifically, the proposed
softmax losses supervise network learning by also taking the SphereConv activations from the last
layer instead of inner products. Note that the geodesic distances on a unit hypersphere is the angles
between inputs and kernels. Therefore, the learning objective is essentially a function of the input
angles and we call it generalized angular softmax loss in this paper. The resulting architecture is the
hyperspherical convolutional network (SphereNet), which is shown in Fig. 1.
Our key motivation to propose SphereNet is that angular information matters in convolutional
representation learning. We argue this motivation from several aspects: training stability, training
efficiency, and generalization power. SphereNet can also be viewed as an implicit regularization to
the network by normalizing the activation distributions. The weight norm is no longer important since
the entire network operates only on angles. And as a result, the `2 weight decay is also no longer
needed in SphereNet. SphereConv to some extent also alleviates the covariate shift problem [8]. The
output of SphereConv operators are bounded from −1 to 1 (0 to 1 if considering ReLU), which makes
the variance of each output also bounded.
Our second intuition is that angles preserve the most abundant discriminative information in convolutional learning. We gain such intuition from 2D Fourier transform, where an image is decomposed by
the combination of a set of templates with magnitude and phase information in 2D frequency domain.
If one reconstructs an image with original magnitudes and random phases, the resulting images
are generally not recognizable. However, if one reconstructs the image with random magnitudes
and original phases. The resulting images are still recognizable. It shows that the most important
structural information in an image for visual recognition is encoded by phases. This fact inspires us
to project the network learning into angular space. In terms of low-level information, SphereConv is
able to preserve the shape, edge, texture and relative color. SphereConv can learn to selectively drop
the color depth but preserve the RGB ratio. Thus the semantic information of an image is preserved.
SphereNet can also be viewed as a non-trivial generalization of [11, 12]. By proposing a loss that
discriminatively supervises the network on a hypersphere, [12] achieves state-of-the-art performance
on face recognition. However, the rest of the network remains a conventional convolution network.
In contrast, SphereNet not only generalizes the hyperspherical constraint to every layer, but also
to different nonlinearity functions of input angles. Specifically, we propose three instances of
SphereConv operators: linear, cosine and sigmoid. The sigmoid SphereConv is the most flexible one
with a parameter controlling the shape of the angular function. As a simple extension to the sigmoid
SphereConv, we also present a learnable SphereConv operator. Moreover, the proposed generalized
angular softmax (GA-Softmax) loss naturaly generalizes the angular supervision in [12] using the
SphereConv operators. Additionally, the SphereConv can serve as a normalization method that is
comparable to batch normalization, leading to an extension to spherical normalization (SphereNorm).
SphereNet can be easily applied to other network architectures such as GoogLeNet [19], VGG [18]
and ResNet [6]. One simply needs to replace the convolutional operators and the loss functions with
the proposed SphereConv operators and hyperspherical loss functions. In summary, SphereConv can
be viewed as an alternative to the original convolution operators, and serves as a new measure of
correlation. SphereNet may open up an interesting direction to explore the neural networks. We ask
the question whether inner product based convolution operator is an optimal correlation measure for
all tasks? Our answer to this question is likely to be “no”.
1
Without loss of generality, we study CNNs here, but our method is generalizable to any other neural nets.
2
2
2.1
Hyperspherical Convolutional Operator
Definition
The convolutional operator in CNNs is simply a linear matrix multiplication, written as F(w, x) =
w> x + bF where w is a convolutional filter, x denotes a local patch from the bottom feature map
and bF is the bias. The matrix multiplication here essentially computes the similarity between the
local patch and the filter. Thus the standard convolution layer can be viewed as patch-wise matrix
multiplication. Different from the standard convolutional operator, the hyperspherical convolutional
(SphereConv) operator computes the similarity on a hypersphere and is defined as:
Fs (w, x) = g(θ(w,x) ) + bFs ,
(1)
where θ(w,x) is the angle between the kernel parameter w and the local patch x. g(θ(w,x) ) indicates
a function of θ(w,x) (usually a monotonically decreasing function), and bFs is the bias. To simplify
analysis and discussion, the bias terms are usually left out. The angle θ(w,x) can be interpreted
as the geodesic distance (arc length) between w and x on a unit hypersphere. In contrast to the
convolutional operator that works in the entire space, SphereConv only focuses on the angles between
local patches and the filters, and therefore operates on the hypersphere space. In this paper, we present
three specific instances of the SphereConv Operator. To facilitate the computation, we constrain the
output of SphereConv operators to [−1, 1] (although it is not a necessary requirement).
Linear SphereConv. In linear SphereConv operator, g is a linear function of θ(w,x) , with the form:
g(θ(w,x) ) = aθ(w,x) + b,
(2)
where a and b are parameters for the linear SphereConv operator. In order to constrain the output
range to [0, 1] while θ(w,x) ∈ [0, π], we use a = − π2 and b = 1 (not necessarily optimal design).
Cosine SphereConv. The cosine SphereConv operator is a nonlinear function of θ(w,x) , with its g being the form of
1
(3)
0.5
w x
which can be reformulated as kwk
. Therefore, it can be
2 kxk2
viewed as a doubly normalized convolutional operator, which
bridges the SphereConv operator and convolutional operator.
0
g(θ(w,x) ) = cos(θ(w,x) ),
T
Sigmoid SphereConv. The Sigmoid SphereConv operator is
derived from the Sigmoid function and its g can be written as
g(θ(w,x) ) =
1+
1−
π
exp(− 2k
)
π
exp(− 2k
)
·
1 − exp
1 + exp
θ(w,x)
k
θ(w,x)
k
Cosine
Linear
Sigmoid (k=0.1)
Sigmoid (k=0.3)
Sigmoid (k=0.7)
-0.5
-1
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
Figure 2: SphereConv operators.
−
π
2k
−
π
2k
,
(4)
where k > 0 is the parameter that controls the curvature of the function. While k is close to 0,
g(θ(w,x) ) will approximate the step function. While k becomes larger, g(θ(w,x) ) is more like a linear
function, i.e., the linear SphereConv operator. Sigmoid SphereConv is one instance of the parametric
SphereConv family. With more parameters being introduced, the parametric SphereConv can have
richer representation power. To increase the flexibility of the parametric SphereConv, we will discuss
the case where these parameters can be jointly learned via back-prop later in the paper.
2.2
Optimization
The optimization of the SphereConv operators is nearly the same as the convolutional operator
and also follows the standard back-propagation. Using the chain rule, we have the gradient of the
SphereConv with respect to the weights and the feature input:
∂g(θ(w,x) )
∂g(θ(w,x) ) ∂θ(w,x)
=
·
,
∂w
∂θ(w,x)
∂w
For different SphereConv operators, both
lies in the
∂g(θ(w,x) )
∂θ(w,x)
part. For
∂θ(w,x)
∂w ,
∂g(θ(w,x) )
∂g(θ(w,x) ) ∂θ(w,x)
=
·
.
∂x
∂θ(w,x)
∂x
∂θ(w,x)
∂w
we have
wT x
and
∂θ(w,x)
∂x
(5)
are the same, so the only difference
T
w x
∂ arccos kwk
∂θ(w,x)
2 kxk2
=
,
∂x
∂x
∂ arccos kwk2 kxk2
∂θ(w,x)
=
,
∂w
∂w
∂g(θ
(6)
)
(w,x)
which are straightforward to compute and therefore neglected here. Because ∂θ(w,x)
for the
linear SphereConv, the cosine SphereConv and the Sigmoid SphereConv are a, − sin(θ(w,x) ) and
−2 exp(θ(w,x) /k−π/2k)
k(1+exp(θ(w,x) /k−π/2k))2
respectively, all these partial gradients can be easily computed.
3
2.3
Theoretical Insights
We provide a fundamental analysis for the cosine SphereConv operator in the case of linear neural
network to justify that the SphereConv operator can improve the conditioning of the problem. In
specific, we consider one layer of linear neural network, where the observation is F = U ∗ V ∗>
(ignore the bias), U ∗ ∈ Rn×k is the weight, and V ∗ ∈ Rm×k is the input that embeds weights from
previous layers. Without loss of generality, we assume the columns satisfying kUi,: k2 = kVj,: k2 = 1
for all i = 1, . . . , n and j = 1, . . . , m, and consider
min
U ∈Rn×k ,V ∈Rm×k
G(U , V ) = 21 kF − U V > k2F .
(7)
This is closely related with the matrix factorization and (7) can be also viewed as the expected version
for the matrix sensing problem [10]. The following lemma demonstrates a critical scaling issue of (7)
for U and V that significantly deteriorate the conditioning without changing the objective of (7).
Lemma 1. Consider a pair of global optimal points U , V satisfying F = U V > and Tr(V > V ⊗
e = cU and Ve = V /c, then we have
In ) ≤ Tr(U > U ⊗ Im ). For any real c > 1, let U
λ
2
2
2
max
e , Ve )) = Ω(c κ(∇ G(U , V ))), where κ =
κ(∇ G(U
λmin is the restricted condition number with
λmax being the largest eigenvalue and λmin being the smallest nonzero eigenvalue.
Lemma 1 implies that the conditioning of the problem (7) at a unbalanced global optimum scaled by
a constant c is Ω(c2 ) times larger than the conditioning of the problem at a balanced global optimum.
Note that λmin = 0 may happen, thus we consider the restricted condition here. Similar results hold
beyond global optima. This is an undesired geometric structure, which further leads to slow and
unstable optimization procedures, e.g., using stochastic gradient descent (SGD). This motivates us to
consider the SphereConv operator discussed above, which is equivalent to projecting data onto the
hypersphere and leads to a better conditioned problem.
Next, we consider our proposed cosine SphereConv operator for one-layer of the linear neural
network. Based on our previous discussion on SphereConv, we consider an equivalent problem:
min
U ∈Rn×k ,V ∈Rm×k
1
1
GS (U , V ) = 21 kF − DU U V > DV k2F ,
n×n
(8)
1
1
where DU = diag kU1,: k2 , . . . , kUn,: k2 ∈ R
and DV = diag kV1,: k2 , . . . , kVm,: k2 ∈
m×m
R
are diagonal matrices. We provide an analogous result to Lemma 1 for (8) .
e , Ve )) =
e = cU and Ve = V /c, then we have λi (∇2 GS (U
Lemma 2. For any real c > 1, let U
2
2
e
λi (∇ GS (U , V )) for all i ∈ [(n + m)k] = {1, 2, . . . , (n + m)k} and κ(∇ G(U , Ve )) =
κ(∇2 G(U , V )), where κ is defined as in Lemma 1.
We have from Lemma 2 that the issue of increasing condition caused by the scaling is eliminated by
the SphereConv operator in the entire parameter space. This enhances the geometric structure over
(7), which further results in improved convergence of optimization procedures. If we extend the result
from one layer to multiple layers, the scaling issue propagates. Roughly speaking, when we train N
layers, in the worst case, the conditioning of the problem can be cN times worse with a scaling factor
c > 1. The analysis is similar to the one layer case, but the computation of the Hessian matrix and
associated eigenvalues are much more complicated. Though our analysis is elementary, we provide
an important insight and a straightforward illustration of the advantage for using the SphereConv
operator. The extension to more general cases, e..g, using nonlinear activation function (e.g., ReLU),
requires much more sophisticated analysis to bound the eigenvalues of Hessian for objectives, which
is deferred to future investigation.
2.4
Discussion
Comparison to convolutional operators. Convolutional operators compute the inner product between the kernels and the local patches, while the SphereConv operators compute a function of the
angle between the kernels and local patches. If we normalize the convolutional operator in terms of
both w and x, then the normalized convolutional operator is equivalent to the cosine SphereConv
operator. Essentially, they use different metric spaces. Interestingly, SphereConv operators can also
be interpreted as a function of the Geodesic distance on a unit hypersphere.
Extension to fully connected layers. Because the fully connected layers can be viewed as a special
convolution layer with the kernel size equal to the input feature map, the SphereConv operators could
be easily generalized to the fully connected layers. It also indicates that SphereConv operators could
be used not only to deep CNNs, but also to linear models like logistic regression, SVM, etc.
4
Network Regularization. Because the norm of weights is no longer crucial, we stop using the `2
weight decay to regularize the network. SphereNets are learned on hyperspheres, so we regularize the
network based on angles instead of norms. To avoid redundant kernels, we want the kernels uniformly
spaced around the hypersphere, but it is difficult to formulate such constraints. As a tradeoff, we
encourage the orthogonality. Given a set of kernels W where the i-th column Wi is the weights of
the i-th kernel, the network will also minimize kW > W − Ik2F where I is an identity matrix.
Determining the optimal SphereConv. In practice, we could treat different types of SphereConv as
a hyperparameter and use the cross validation to determine which SphereConv is the most suitable
one. For sigmoid SphereConv, we could also use the cross validation to determine its hyperparameter
k. In general, we need to specify a SphereConv operator before using it, but prefixing a SphereConv
may not be an optimal choice (even using cross validation). What if we treat the hyperparameter k in
sigmoid SphereConv as a learnable parameter and use the back-prop to learn it? Following this idea,
we further extend sigmoid SphereConv to a learnable SphereConv in the next subsection.
SphereConv as normalization. Because SphereConv could partially address the covariate shift, it
could also serve as a normalization method similar to batch normalization. Differently, SphereConv
normalizes the network in terms of feature map and kernel weights, while batch normalization is for
the mini-batches. Thus they do not contradict with each other and can be used simultaneously.
2.5 Extension: Learnable SphereConv and SphereNorm
Learnable SphereConv. It is a natrual idea to replace the current prefixed SphereConv with a
learnable one. There will be plenty of parametrization choices for the SphereConv to be learnable,
and we present a very simple learnable SphereConv operator based on the sigmoid SphereConv.
Because the sigmoid SphereConv has a hyperparameter k, we could treat it as a learnable parameter
that can be updated by back-prop. In back-prop, k is updated using k t+1 = k t + η ∂L
∂k where t denotes
∂L
the current iteration index and ∂k can be easily computed by the chain rule. Usually, we also require
k to be positive. The learning of k is in fact similar to the parameter learning in PReLU [5].
SphereNorm: hyperspherical learning as a normalization method. Similar to batch normalization (BatchNorm), we note that the hyperspherical learning can also be viewed as a way of
normalization, because SphereConv constrain the output value in [−1, 1] ([0, 1] after ReLU). Different from BatchNorm, SphereNorm normalizes the network based on spatial information and the
weights, so it has nothing to do with the mini-batch statistic. Because SphereNorm normalize both
the input and weights, it could avoid covariate shift due to large weights and large inputs while
BatchNorm could only prevent covariate shift caused by the inputs. In such sense, it will work better
than BatchNorm when the batch size is small. Besides, SphereConv is more flexible in terms of
design choices (e.g. linear, cosine, and sigmoid) and each may lead to different advantages.
Similar to BatchNorm, we could use a rescaling strategy for the SphereNorm. Specifically, we rescale
the output of SphereConv via βFs (w, x) + γ where β and γ are learned by back-prop (similar to
BatchNorm, the rescaling parameters can be either learned or prefixed). In fact, SphereNorm does not
contradict with the BatchNorm at all and can be used simultaneously with BatchNorm. Interestingly,
we find using both is empirically better than using either one alone.
3
Learning Objective on Hyperspheres
For learning on hyperspheres, we can either use the conventional loss function such as softmax loss,
or use some loss functions that are tailored for the SphereConv operators. We present some possible
choices for these tailored loss functions.
Weight-normalized Softmax Loss. The input feature and its label are denoted as xi and yi , respec
P
P
fy
tively. The original softmax loss can be written as L = N1 i Li = N1 i − log Pe eifj where N
j
is the number of training samples and fj is the score of the j-th class (j ∈ [1, K], K is the number of
classes). The class score vector f is usually the output of a fully connected layer W , so we have
fj = Wj> xi + bj and fyi = Wy>i xi + byi in which xi , Wj , and Wyi are the i-th training sample, the
j-th and yi -th column of W respectively. We can rewrite Li as
Li = − log
Wy> xi +byi
e
P
j
i
e
Wj> xi +bj
= − log
ekWyi kkxi k cos(θyi ,i )+byi
P kW kkx k cos(θ )+b
j
i
j,i
j
je
,
(9)
where θj,i (0 ≤ θj,i ≤ π) is the angle between vector Wj and xi . The decision boundary of the
original softmax loss is determined by the vector f . Specifically in the binary-class case, the
5
decision boundary of the softmax loss is W1> x + b1 = W2> x + b2 . Considering the intuition of the
SphereConv operators, we want to make the decision boundary only depend on the angles. To this
end, we normalize the weights (kWj k = 1) and zero out the biases (bj = 0), following the intuition in
[12] (sometimes we could keep the biases while data is imbalanced). The decision boundary becomes
kxk cos(θ1 ) = kxk cos(θ2 ). Similar to SphereConv, we could generalize the decision boundary to
kxkg(θ1 ) = kxkg(θ2 ), so the weight-normalized softmax (W-Softmax) loss can be written as
Li = − log
ekxi kg(θyi ,i )
P kx kg(θ ) ,
i
j,i
je
(10)
where g(·) can take the form of linear SphereConv, cosine SphereConv, or sigmoid SphereConv.
Thus we also term these three difference weight-normalized loss functions as linear W-Softmax loss,
cosine W-Softmax loss, and sigmoid W-Softmax loss, respectively.
Generalized Angular Softmax Loss. Inspired by [12], we use a multiplicative parameter m to impose margins on hyperspheres. We propose a generalized angular softmax (GA-Softmax) loss which
extends the W-Softmax loss to a loss function that favors large angular margin feature distribution. In
general, the GA-Softmax loss is formulated as
Li = − log
ekxi kg(mθyi ,i )
,
P
ekxi kg(mθyi ,i ) + j6=yi ekxi kg(θj,i )
(11)
where g(·) could also have the linear, cosine and sigmoid form, similar to the W-Softmax loss. We can
see A-Softmax loss [12] is exactly the cosine GA-Softmax loss and W-Softmax loss is the special case
π
], because cos(θj,i ) is only
(m = 1) of GA-Sofmtax loss. Note that we usually require θj,i ∈ [0, m
monotonically decreasing in [0, π]. To address this, [11, 12] construct a monotonically decreasing
π
function recursively using the [0, m
] part of cos(mθj,i ). Although it indeed partially addressed the
issue, it may introduce a number of saddle points (w.r.t. W ) in the loss surfaces. Originally, ∂g
∂θ will
be close to 0 only when θ is close to 0 and π. However, in L-Softmax [11] or A-Softmax (cosine
kθ
GA-Softmax), it is not the case. ∂g
∂θ will be 0 when θ = m , k = 0, · · · , m. It will possibly cause
instability in training. The sigmoid GA-Softmax loss also has similar issues. However, if we use
the linear GA-Softmax loss, this problem will be automatically solved and the training will possibly
become more stable in practice. There will also be a lot of choices of g(·) to design a specific
GA-Sofmtax loss, and each one has different optimization dynamics. The optimal one may depend
on the task itself (e.g. cosine GA-Softmax has been shown effective in deep face recognition [12]).
Discussion of Sphere-normalized Softmax Loss. We have also considered the sphere-normalized
softmax loss (S-Softmax), which simultaneously normalizes the weights (Wj ) and the feature x.
It seems to be a more natural choice than W-Softmax for the proposed SphereConv and makes the
entire framework more unified. In fact, we have tried this and the empirical results are not that good,
because the optimization seems to become very difficult. If we use the S-Softmax loss to train a
network from scratch, we can not get reasonable results without using extra tricks, which is the reason
we do not use it in this paper. For completeness, we give some discussions here. Normally, it is very
difficult to make the S-Softmax loss value to be small enough, because we normalize the features to
unit hypersphere. To make this loss work, we need to either normalize the feature to a value much
larger than 1 (hypersphere with large radius) and then tune the learning rate or first train the network
with the softmax loss from scratch and then use the S-Softmax loss for finetuning.
4
4.1
Experiments and Results
Experimental Settings
We will first perform comprehensive ablation study and exploratory experiments for the proposed
SphereNets, and then evaluate the SphereNets on image classification. For the image classification
task, we perform experiments on CIFAR10 (only with random left-right flipping), CIFAR10+ (with
full data augmentation), CIFAR100 and large-scale Imagenet 2012 datasets [17].
General Settings. For CIFAR10, CIFAR10+ and CIFAR100, we follow the same settings from
[7, 11]. For Imagenet 2012 dataset, we mostly follow the settings in [9]. We attach more details in
Appendix B. For fairness, batch normalization and ReLU are used in all methods if not specified. All
the comparisons are made to be fair. Compared CNNs have the same architecture with SphereNets.
Training. Appendix A gives the network details. For CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100, we use the ADAM,
starting with the learning rate 0.001. The batch size is 128 if not specified. The learning rate is divided
by 10 at 34K, 54K iterations and the training stops at 64K. For both A-Softmax and GA-Softmax loss,
6
we use m = 4. For Imagenet-2012, we use the SGD with momentum 0.9. The learning rate starts
with 0.1, and is divided by 10 at 200K and 375K iterations. The training stops at 550K iteration.
4.2
Ablation Study and Exploratory Experiments
We perform comprehensive Ablation and exploratory study on the SphereNet and evaluate every
component individually in order to analyze its advantages. We use the 9-layer CNN as default (if not
specified) and perform the image classification on CIFAR-10 without any data augmentation.
SphereConv
Operator / Loss
Original
Softmax
Sigmoid (0.1)
W-Softmax
Sigmoid (0.3)
W-Softmax
Sigmoid (0.7)
W-Softmax
Linear
W-Softmax
Cosine
W-Softmax
A-Softmax
(m=4)
GA-Softmax
(m=4)
Sigmoid (0.1)
Sigmoid (0.3)
Sigmoid (0.7)
Linear
Cosine
Original Conv
90.97
91.08
91.05
91.10
90.89
90.58
90.91
91.44
91.16
90.93
90.88
90.58
90.89
91.37
91.47
91.42
91.08
90.73
90.88
91.21
91.07
90.96
91.22
90.78
91.07
91.34
90.99
90.95
91.17
91.08
91.13
91.28
91.18
91.24
90.99
90.68
91.87
92.13
92.22
92.21
91.94
91.78
91.99
92.38
92.36
92.32
92.19
91.80
Table 1: Classification accuracy (%) with different loss functions.
Comparison of different loss functions. We first evaluate all the SphereConv operators with
different loss functions. All the compared SphereConv operators use the 9-layer CNN architecture
in the experiment. From the results in Table 1, one can observe that the SphereConv operators
consistently outperforms the original convolutional operator. For the compared loss functions except
A-Softmax and GA-Softmax, the effect on accuracy seems to less crucial than the SphereConv
operators, but sigmoid W-Softmax is more flexible and thus works slightly better than the others.
The sigmoid SphereConv operators with a suitably chosen parameter also works better than the
others. Note that, W-Softmax loss is in fact comparable to the original softmax loss, because our
SphereNet optimizes angles and the W-Softmax is derived from the original softmax loss. Therefore,
it is fair to compare the SphereNet with W-Softmax and CNN with softmax loss. From Table 1,
we can see SphereConv operators are consistently better than the covolutional operators. While
we use a large-margin loss function like the A-Softmax [12] and the proposed GA-Softmax, the
accuracy can be further boosted. One may notice that A-Softmax is actually cosine GA-Softmax. The
superior performance of A-Softmax with SphereNet shows that our architecture is more suitable for
the learning of angular loss. Moreover, our proposed large-margin loss (linear GA-Softmax) performs
the best among all these compared loss functions.
Comparison of different network architectures. We are also interested in how our SphereConv
operators work in different architectures. We evaluate all the proposed SphereConv operators with
the same architecture of different layers and a totally different architecture (ResNet). Our baseline
CNN architecture follows the design of VGG network [18] only with different convolutional layers.
For fair comparison, we use cosine W-Softmax for all SphereConv operators and original softmax
for original convolution operators. From the results in Table 2, one can see that SphereNets greatly
outperforms the CNN baselines, usually with more than 1% improvement. While applied to ResNet,
our SphereConv operators also work better than the baseline. Note that, we use the similar ResNet
architecture from the CIFAR-10 experiment in [6]. We do not use data augmentation for CIFAR-10
in this experiment, so the ResNet accuracy is much lower than the reported one in [6]. Our results on
different network architectures show consistent and significant improvement over CNNs.
SphereConv Operator
CNN-3
CNN-9
CNN-18
CNN-45
CNN-60
ResNet-32
SphereConv Operator
Acc. (%)
Sigmoid (0.1)
Sigmoid (0.3)
Sigmoid (0.7)
Linear
Cosine
Original Conv
82.08
81.92
82.4
82.31
82.23
81.19
91.13
91.28
91.18
91.15
90.99
90.68
91.43
91.55
91.69
91.24
91.23
90.62
89.34
89.73
89.85
90.15
90.05
88.23
87.67
87.85
88.42
89.91
89.28
88.15
90.94
91.7
91.19
91.25
91.38
90.40
Sigmoid (0.1)
Sigmoid (0.3)
Sigmoid (0.7)
Linear
Cosine
CNN w/o ReLU
86.29
85.67
85.51
85.34
85.25
80.73
Table 2: Classification accuracy (%) with different network architectures.
Table 3: Acc. w/o ReLU.
Comparison of different width (number of filters). We evaluate the SphereNet with different
number of filters. Fig. 3(c) shows the convergence of different width of SphereNets. 16/32/48 means
conv1.x, conv2.x and conv3.x have 16, 32 and 48 filters, respectively. One could observe that while
the number of filters are small, SphereNet performs similarly to CNNs (slightly worse). However,
while we increase the number of filters, the final accuracy will surpass the CNN baseline even faster
and more stable convergence performance. With large width, we find that SphereNets perform
consistently better than CNN baselines, showing that SphereNets can make better use of the width.
Learning without ReLU. We notice that SphereConv operators are no longer a matrix multiplication,
so it is essentially a non-linear function. Because the SphereConv operators already introduce certain
7
1
0.9
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
ResNet baseline on CIFAR10
ResNet baseline on CIFAR10+
SphereResNet (Sigmoid 0.3) on CIFAR10
SphereResNet (Sigmoid 0.3) on CIFAR10+
0.2
0.1
0
0
1
2
3
4
Iteration
5
6
(a) ResNet vs. SphereResNet
on CIFAR-10/10+
7
x104
0.7
Testing Accuracy
0.7
0.6
0.5
CNN Baseline
SphereNet (cosine) w/o orth.
SphereNet (cosine) w/ orth.
SphereNet (linear) w/ orth.
SphereNet (Sigmoid 0.3) w/ orth.
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
1
2
3
4
Iteration
5
6
(b) CNN vs. SphereNet (orth.)
on CIFAR-10
0.915
0.7
0.91
0.9
0.5
5.5
6
CNN 16/32/48
SphereNet 16/32/48
CNN 64/96/128
SphereNet 64/96/128
CNN 128/192/256
SphereNet 128/192/256
CNN 256/384/512
SphereNet 256/384/512
0.4
0.3
0.1
0.7
0.905
0.6
0.2
7
x10 4
69-layer CNN
69-layer SphereNet
0.8
0.8
0.8
Testing Accuracy
Testing Accuracy
0.8
0.9
0.9
0
1
2
3
Iteration
4
5
6.5
4
x10
Testing Accuracy
1
0.9
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
6
0
x10 4
(c) Different width of SphereNet
on CIFAR-10
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
Iteration
2.5
3
3.5
(d) Deep CNN vs. SphereNet
on CIFAR-10
4
x10 4
Figure 3: Testing accuracy over iterations. (a) ResNet vs. SphereResNet. (b) Plain CNN vs. plain SphereNet. (c)
Different width of SphereNet. (d) Ultra-deep plain CNN vs. ultra-deep plain SphereNet.
non-linearity to the network, we evaluate how much gain will such non-linearity bring. Therefore, we
remove the ReLU activation and compare our SphereNet with the CNNs without ReLU. The results
are given in Table 3. All the compared methods use 18-layer CNNs (with BatchNorm). Although
removing ReLU greatly reduces the classification accuracy, our SphereNet still outperforms the CNN
without ReLU by a significant margin, showing its rich non-linearity and representation power.
Convergence. One of the most significant advantages of SphereNet is its training stability and
convergence speed. We evaluate the convergence with two different architectures: CNN-9 and
ResNet-32. For fair comparison, we use the original softmax loss for all compared methods (including
SphereNets). ADAM is used for the stochastic optimization and the learning rate is the same for all
networks. From Fig. 3(a), the SphereResNet converges significantly faster than the original ResNet
baseline in both CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-10+ and the final accuracy are also higher than the baselines.
In Fig. 3(b), we evaluate the SphereNet with and without orthogonality constraints on kernel weights.
With the same network architecture, SphereNet also converges much faster and performs better
than the baselines. The orthogonality constraints also can bring performance gains in some cases.
Generally from Fig. 3, one could also observe that the SphereNet converges fast and very stably in
every case while the CNN baseline fluctuates in a relative wide range.
Optimizing ultra-deep networks. Partially because of the alleviation of the covariate shift problem
and the improvement of conditioning, our SphereNet is able to optimize ultra-deep neural networks
without using residual units or any form of shortcuts. For SphereNets, we use the cosine SphereConv
operator with the cosine W-Softmax loss. We directly optimize a very deep plain network with 69
stacked convolutional layers. From Fig. 3(d), one can see that the convergence of SphereNet is much
easier than the CNN baseline and the SphereNet is able to achieve nearly 90% final accuracy.
Frequency
4.3 Preliminary Study towards Learnable SphereConv
Although the learnable SphereConv is not a main theme of this
paper, we still run some preliminary evaluations on it. For the
0.3
proposed learnable sigmoid SphereConv, we learn the parameter
conv1.1
conv2.1
k independently for each filter. It is also trivial to learn it in a
conv3.1
0.2
layer-shared or network-shared fashsion. With the same 9-layer
architecture used in Section 4.2, the learnable SphereConv (with
0.1
cosine W-Softmax loss) achieves 91.64% on CIFAR-10 (without
0
full data augmentation), while the best sigmoid SphereConv (with
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
The value of k
cosine W-Softmax loss) achieves 91.22%. In Fig. 4, we also plot
the frequency histogram of k in Conv1.1 (64 filters), Conv2.1 (96 Figure 4: Frequency histogram of k.
filters) and Conv3.1 (128 filters) of the final learned SphereNet.
From Fig. 4, we observe that each layer learns different distribution of k. The first convolutional
layer (Conv1.1) tends to uniformly distribute k into a large range of values from 0 to 1, potentially
extracting information from all levels of angular similarity. The fourth convolutional layer (Conv2.1)
tends to learn more concentrated distribution of k than Conv1.1, while the seventh convolutional
layer (Conv3.1) learns highly concentrated distribution of k which is centered around 0.8. Note that,
we initialize all k with a constant 0.5 and learn them with the back-prop.
4.4 Evaluation of SphereNorm
From Section 4.2, we could clearly see the convergence advantage of SphereNets. In general, we can
view the SphereConv as a normalization method (comparable to batch normalization) that can be
applied to all kinds of networks. This section evaluates the challenging scenarios where the minibatch size is small (results under 128 batch size could be found in Section 4.2) and we use the same
8
0.8
0.7
BatchNorm
SphereNorm
Rescaled SphereNorm
SphereNorm w/ Orth.
SphereNorm+BatchNorm
0.4
BatchNorm
SphereNorm
SphereNorm+BatchNorm
0.3
0.2
0
1
2
3
Iteration
4
5
(a) Mini-Batch Size = 4
6
x10 4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.9
0.8
Testing Accuracy
Testing Accuracy
0.6
0.5
0.1
Testing Accuracy
0.7
0.6
0.9
Testing Accuracy
0.9
0.8
0
1
2
3
Iteration
4
5
(b) Mini-Batch Size = 8
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
6
x10 4
0.5
BatchNorm
SphereNorm
Rescaled SphereNorm
SphereNorm w/ Orth.
SphereNorm+BatchNorm
0
1
2
3
Iteration
4
5
(c) Mini-Batch Size = 16
BatchNorm
SphereNorm
Rescaled SphereNorm
SphereNorm w/ Orth.
SphereNorm+BatchNorm
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
6
x10 4
0
1
2
3
Iteration
4
5
(d) Mini-Batch Size = 32
6
x10 4
Figure 5: Convergence under different mini-batch size on CIFAR-10 dataset (Same setting as Section 4.2).
9-layer CNN as in Section 4.2. To be simple, we use the cosine SphereConv as SphereNorm. The
softmax loss is used in both CNNs and SphereNets. From Fig. 5, we could observe that SphereNorm
achieves the final accuracy similar to BatchNorm, but SphereNorm converges faster and more stably.
SphereNorm plus the orthogonal constraint helps convergence a little bit and rescaled SphereNorm
does not seem to work well. While BatchNorm and SphereNorm are used together, we obtain the
fastest convergence and the highest final accuracy, showing excellent compatibility of SphereNorm.
4.5 Image Classification on CIFAR-10+ and CIFAR-100
We first evaluate the SphereNet in a classic image
classification task. We use the CIFAR-10+ and CIMethod
CIFAR-10+
CIFAR-100
ELU [2]
94.16
72.34
FAR100 datasets and perform random flip (both horiFitResNet (LSUV) [14]
93.45
65.72
zontal and vertical) and random crop as data augmentaResNet-1001 [7]
95.38
77.29
tion (CIFAR-10 with full data augmentation is denoted
Baseline ResNet-32 (softmax)
93.26
72.85
SphereResNet-32 (S-SW)
94.47
76.02
as CIFAR-10+). We use the ResNet-32 as a baseline arSphereResNet-32 (L-LW)
94.33
75.62
SphereResNet-32 (C-CW)
94.64
74.92
chitecture. For the SphereNet of the same architecture,
SphereResNet-32 (S-G)
95.01
76.39
we evaluate sigmoid SphereConv operator (k = 0.3)
with sigmoid W-Softmax (k = 0.3) loss (S-SW), lin- Table 4: Acc. (%) on CIFAR-10+ & CIFAR-100.
ear SphereConv operator with linear W-Softmax loss
(L-LW), cosine SphereConv operator with cosine W-Softmax loss (C-CW) and sigmoid SphereConv
operator (k = 0.3) with GA-Softmax loss (S-G). In Table 4, we could see the SphereNet outperforms
a lot of current state-of-the-art methods and is even comparable to the ResNet-1001 which is far
deeper than ours. This experiment further validates our idea that learning on a hyperspheres constrains
the parameter space to a more semantic and label-related one.
Top5 Error Rate
Top1 Error Rate
4.6 Large-scale Image Classification on Imagenet-2012
We evaluate SphereNets on large-scale Imagenet0.9
0.7
2012 dataset. We only use the minimum data
ResNet-18
ResNet-18
SphereResNet-18-v1
SphereResNet-18-v1
0.8
0.6
augmentation strategy in the experiment (details
SphereResNet-18-v2
SphereResNet-18-v2
0.7
0.5
are in Appendix B). For the ResNet-18 baseline
0.6
0.4
and SphereResNet-18, we use the same filter numbers in each layer. We develop two types of
0.5
0.3
SphereResNet-18, termed as v1 and v2 respec0.4
0.2
tively. In SphereResNet-18-v2, we do not use
0.3
0.1
0
1
2
3
4
5
0
1
2
3
4
5
SphereConv in the 1 × 1 shortcut convolutions
Iteration
x10
Iteration
x10
which are used to match the number of channels.
Figure 6: Validation error (%) on ImageNet.
In SphereResNet-18-v1, we use SphereConv in
the 1 × 1 shortcut convolutions. Fig. 6 shows the single crop validation error over iterations. One could
observe that both SphereResNets converge much faster than the ResNet baseline, while SphereResNet18-v1 converges the fastest but yields a slightly worse yet comparable accuracy. SphereResNet-18-v2
not only converges faster than ResNet-18, but it also shows slightly better accuracy.
5
5
5
Limitations and Future Work
Our work still has some limitations: (1) SphereNets have large performance gain while the network
is wide enough. If the network is not wide enough, SphereNets still converge much faster but yield
slightly worse (still comparable) recognition accuracy. (2) The computation complexity of each
neuron is slightly higher than the CNNs. (3) SphereConvs are still mostly prefixed. Possible future
work includes designing/learning a better SphereConv, efficiently computing the angles to reduce
computation complexity, applications to the tasks that require fast convergence (e.g. reinforcement
learning and recurrent neural networks), better angular regularization to replace orthogonality, etc.
9
Acknowledgements
We thank Zhen Liu (Georgia Tech) for helping with the experiments and providing suggestions. This
project was supported in part by NSF IIS-1218749, NIH BIGDATA 1R01GM108341, NSF CAREER
IIS-1350983, NSF IIS-1639792 EAGER, NSF CNS-1704701, ONR N00014-15-1-2340, Intel ISTC,
NVIDIA and Amazon AWS. Xingguo Li is supported by doctoral dissertation fellowship from
University of Minnesota. Yan-Ming Zhang is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation
of China under Grant 61773376.
References
[1] L-C. Chen, G. Papandreou, I. Kokkinos, K. Murphy, and A. L. Yuille. Semantic image
segmentation with deep convolutional nets and fully connected crfs. In ICLR, 2015.
[2] Djork-Arné Clevert, Thomas Unterthiner, and Sepp Hochreiter. Fast and accurate deep network
learning by exponential linear units (elus). arXiv:1511.07289, 2015.
[3] Ross Girshick, Jeff Donahue, Trevor Darrell, and Jitendra Malik. Rich feature hierarchies for
accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. In CVPR, 2014.
[4] Xavier Glorot and Yoshua Bengio. Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward
neural networks. In Aistats, 2010.
[5] Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. Delving deep into rectifiers:
Surpassing human-level performance on imagenet classification. In ICCV, 2015.
[6] Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. Deep residual learning for image
recognition. In CVPR, 2016.
[7] Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. Identity mappings in deep residual
networks. arXiv:1603.05027, 2016.
[8] Sergey Ioffe and Christian Szegedy. Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training
by reducing internal covariate shift. In ICML, 2015.
[9] Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Geoffrey E Hinton. Imagenet classification with deep
convolutional neural networks. In NIPS, 2012.
[10] Xingguo Li, Zhaoran Wang, Junwei Lu, Raman Arora, Jarvis Haupt, Han Liu, and Tuo
Zhao. Symmetry, saddle points, and global geometry of nonconvex matrix factorization.
arXiv:1612.09296, 2016.
[11] Weiyang Liu, Yandong Wen, Zhiding Yu, and Meng Yang. Large-margin softmax loss for
convolutional neural networks. In ICML, 2016.
[12] Weiyang Liu, Yandong Wen, Zhiding Yu, Ming Li, Bhiksha Raj, and Le Song. Sphereface:
Deep hypersphere embedding for face recognition. In CVPR, 2017.
[13] Jonathan Long, Evan Shelhamer, and Trevor Darrell. Fully convolutional networks for semantic
segmentation. In CVPR, 2015.
[14] Dmytro Mishkin and Jiri Matas. All you need is a good init. arXiv:1511.06422, 2015.
[15] Yuji Nakatsukasa. Eigenvalue perturbation bounds for hermitian block tridiagonal matrices.
Applied Numerical Mathematics, 62(1):67–78, 2012.
[16] Shaoqing Ren, Kaiming He, Ross Girshick, and Jian Sun. Faster r-cnn: Towards real-time
object detection with region proposal networks. In Advances in neural information processing
systems, pages 91–99, 2015.
[17] Olga Russakovsky, Jia Deng, Hao Su, Jonathan Krause, Sanjeev Satheesh, Sean Ma, Zhiheng
Huang, Andrej Karpathy, Aditya Khosla, Michael Bernstein, et al. Imagenet large scale visual
recognition challenge. IJCV, pages 1–42, 2014.
10
[18] Karen Simonyan and Andrew Zisserman. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale
image recognition. arXiv:1409.1556, 2014.
[19] Christian Szegedy, Wei Liu, Yangqing Jia, Pierre Sermanet, Scott Reed, Dragomir Anguelov,
Dumitru Erhan, Vincent Vanhoucke, and Andrew Rabinovich. Going deeper with convolutions.
In CVPR, 2015.
[20] Andreas Veit, Michael J Wilber, and Serge Belongie. Residual networks behave like ensembles
of relatively shallow networks. In NIPS, 2016.
[21] Di Xie, Jiang Xiong, and Shiliang Pu. All you need is beyond a good init: Exploring better
solution for training extremely deep convolutional neural networks with orthonormality and
modulation. arXiv:1703.01827, 2017.
11
A
Network Architectures
Layer
CNN-3
CNN-9
Conv1.x
Pool1
Conv2.x
Pool2
Conv3.x
Pool3
Fully Connected
[3×3, 64]×1
[3×3, 64]×3
[3×3, 96]×1
[3×3, 96]×3
[3×3, 128]×1
[3×3, 128]×3
256
256
CNN-18
CNN-45
[3×3, 64]×6
[3×3, 64]×15
2×2 Max Pooling, Stride 2
[3×3, 96]×6
[3×3, 96]×15
2×2 Max Pooling, Stride 2
[3×3, 128]×6
[3×3, 128]×15
2×2 Max Pooling, Stride 2
256
256
CNN-60
CNN-69
[3×3, 64]×20
[3×3, 64]×23
[3×3, 96]×20
[3×3, 96]×23
[3×3, 128]×20
[3×3, 128]×23
256
256
Table 5: Our plain CNN architectures with different convolutional layers. Conv1.x, Conv2.x and Conv3.x
denote convolution units that may contain multiple convolution layers. E.g., [3×3, 64]×3 denotes 3 cascaded
convolution layers with 64 filters of size 3×3.
Layer
ResNet-32 for Section 4.2
ResNet-32 for Section 4.3
Conv0.x
N/A
N/A
" [3×3, 64]×1
#
3 × 3, 64
×5
3 × 3, 64
"
#
3 × 3, 96
×5
3 × 3, 96
#
"
3 × 3, 128
×5
3 × 3, 128
" [3×3, 96]×1
#
3 × 3, 96
×5
3 × 3, 96
"
#
3 × 3, 192
×5
3 × 3, 192
#
"
3 × 3, 384
×5
3 × 3, 384
Conv1.x
Conv2.x
Conv3.x
Conv4.x
N/A
N/A
ResNet-18 for Section 4.6
[7×7, 256], Stride 2
3×3, Max Pooling, Stride 2
"
#
3 × 3, 256
×2
3 × 3, 256
"
#
3 × 3, 512
×2
3 × 3, 512
#
"
3 × 3, 768
×2
3 × 3, 768
"
#
3 × 3, 1024
×2
3 × 3, 1024
Average Pooling
Table 6: Our ResNet architectures with different convolutional layers. Conv0.x, Conv1.x, Conv2.x, Conv3.x
and Conv4.x denote convolution units that may contain multiple convolutional layers, and residual units are
shown in double-column brackets. Conv1.x, Conv2.x and Conv3.x usually operate on different size feature
maps. These networks are essentially the same as [6], but some may have different number of filters in each
layer. The downsampling is performed by convolutions with a stride of 2. E.g., [3×3, 64]×4 denotes 4 cascaded
convolution layers with 64 filters of size 3×3, and S2 denotes stride 2.
B
Experimental Details for Imagenet-2012
For the input data of the Imagenet-2012 experiment, we only use the minimum data augmentation.
Specifically, we first resize the images to 256 × 256 resolution and then randomly crop patches of
size 224 × 224 from the resized images. Besides that, we also randomly flip the image horizontally.
For SphereResNet-18-v1, we use the cosine SphereConv and the cosine W-Softmax loss. For
SphereResNet-18-v2, we use the cosine SphereConv and the softmax loss. Generally, we find that the
standard softmax loss and all kinds of W-Softmax loss usually have similar empirical performance.
Note that, we could obtain better performance by using the other SphereConvs (sigmoid SphereConv
with k = 0.3 is a good choice), but it requires more GPU memory. Due to the width of our
architecture and the limitation of GPU memory, the mini-batch size is set to 40 for all methods in the
Imagenet-2012 experiment.
C
More Discussions for Sphere-normalized Softmax Loss
The sphere-normalized softmax (S-Softmax) loss is essentially applying the SphereConv to the fully
connected layer in the softmax loss2 . However, simply applying the SphereConv can not make such
loss work, because this loss function is difficult to converge in practice. To address this, we rescale
the logit output of the S-Softmax loss with a scaling factor s. Therefore, the output range is changed
from [−1, 1] to [−s, s]. Typically, setting s from 10 to 70 works pretty well in practice. We could
also use the cross-validation strategy to set the hyperparameter s.
2
The softmax loss is defined as the combination of the last fully connected layer, the softmax function and
the cross-entropy loss.
12
D
D.1
Proofs of Lemmas
Proof of Lemma 1
The gradient is
∇G(U , V ) =
∇U G(U , V )
∇V G(U , V )
=
(U V > − F )V
(V U > − F > )U
The Hessian matrix is
∇2U G(U , V ) ∇2U ,V G(U , V )
2
∇ G(U , V ) =
∇2V ,U G(U , V ) ∇2V G(U , V )
V > V ⊗ In
(U V > − F ) ⊗ Ik + U V
=
,
(V U > − F > ) ⊗ Ik + V U
U > U ⊗ Im
(12)
where In is an n × n identity matrix for any integer n, given matrices A ∈ Rn×r and B ∈ Rm×k
with A:,i denoting the i-th column of A, A B ∈ Rnk×mr is defined as
>
>
>
A:,1 B:,1
A:,2 B:,1
· · · A:,r B:,1
>
>
>
A:,1 B:,2
A:,2 B:,2
· · · A:,r B:,2
AB =
.
..
..
..
..
.
.
.
.
>
A:,1 B:,k
>
A:,2 B:,k
···
>
A:,r B:,k
e = cU and
At a global optimum, we have U V > = F . Then it is easy to see that for any real c, if U
Ve = V /c, then we have
1 >
V ⊗ In
U V
2V
2
e
e
c
∇ G(U , V ) =
V U
c2 U > U ⊗ Im
We have that at a global optimal point, ∇2 G(U , V ) is a positive semidefinite matrix with the smallest
eigenvalue equal to 0. Specifically, due to the existence of the invariance, i.e., U V > = U R(V R)>
for any orthogonal matrix R ∈ Rr×r , there are r(r − 1)/2 number of eigenvectors of ∇2 G(U , V )
at U V > = F corresponding to 0 eigenvalue [10]. Then for any c > 1, we have
e , Ve )) = 1 Tr(V > V ⊗ In ) + c2 Tr(U > U ⊗ Im )
Tr(∇2 G(U
c2
c2
c2
≥
Tr(V > V ⊗ In ) + Tr(U > U ⊗ Im ) = Tr(∇2 G(U , V )).
2
2
2
e , Ve ) is on the order of Θ(c2 ) times the largest
This indicates that the largest eigenvalue of ∇ G(U
2
eigenvalue of ∇ G(U , V ) following the perturbation bound analysis [15] and U and V are balanced.
e , Ve ) is no greater than the smallest
Using a similar idea, the smallest nonzero eigenvalue of ∇2 G(U
nonzero eigenvalue of ∇2 G(U , V ), which results in our claim on the restricted condition number.
D.2
Proof of Lemma 2
The gradient of GS (U , V ) is
∇U GS (U , V )
∇GS (U , V ) =
with
∇V GS (U , V )
3
∇U GS (U , V ) = DU (DU U V > DV − F )DV V − DU
(DU U V > DV − F ) ~k (U V > DV )
>
>
∇V GS (U , V ) = DV (DV V U DU − F )DU U −
DV3
>
>
>
U,
V,
(DV V U DU − F ) ~k (V U DU )
Note that after each iteration of SGD, we perform the entry-wise normalization for both U and V ,
which means DU = In and DV = Im . Then the gradient of GS (U , V ) is
(U V > − F )V − (U V > − F ) ~k (U V > ) U
∇U GS (U , V )
∇GS (U , V ) =
=
,
∇V GS (U , V )
(V U > − F > )U − (V U > − F > ) ~k (V U > )
V
13
where given matrices A, B ∈ Rn×m with A:,i denoting the i-th column of A, A B ∈ Rn×m is
the Hadamard (pointwise) product, and the operation A ~k B ∈ Rn×k is defined as
>
A1,: B1,:
>
A2,: B2,:
A ~k B =
11×k ,
..
.
>
An,: Bn,:
where 11×k is a 1 × k vector with all entries equal to 1.
Consequently, the Hessian matrix is
∇2U GS (U , V ) ∇2U ,V GS (U , V )
2
∇ GS (U , V ) =
with
∇2V ,U GS (U , V ) ∇2V GS (U , V )
∇2U GS (U , V ) = V > V ⊗ In − diag vec (U V > − F ) ~k (U V > )
diag U:,1
(2U V > − F )V:,1
..
.
diag U:,k
(2U V > − F )V:,1
−
···
..
.
···
diag U:,1
(2U V > − F )V:,k
..
.
diag U:,k
(2U V > − F )V:,k
∇2U ,V GS (U , V ) = Ik ⊗ (U V > − F ) + U V
−
(2U V > − F )
(2U V > − F )
((U:,1
..
.
((U:,k
· · · (2U V > − F )
..
.
U:1 )11×m ) · · · (2U V > − F )
U:1 )11×m )
((U:,1
..
.
U:k )11×m )
((U:,k
U:k )11×m )
>
∇2V ,U GS (U , V ) = ∇2U ,V GS (U , V )
∇2V GS (U , V ) = U > U ⊗ In − diag vec (V U > − F > ) ~k (V U > )
diag V:,1
−
diag V:,k
(2V U > − F > )U:,1
..
.
· · · diag V:,1
..
.
(2V U > − F > )U:,1
· · · diag V:,k
(2V U > − F > )U:,k
..
.
(2V U > − F > )U:,k
e , Ve )) = λi (∇2 GS (U , V )) for all i ∈ [(n+m)k] = {1, 2, . . . , (n+m)k}
Then we have λi (∇2 GS (U
Ui,j
Vi,j
by noticing that we normalize the data as kUi,:
k2 for all i ∈ [n] and kVi,: k2 for all i ∈ [m]. This
finishes the proof.
14
| 1cs.CV
|
The Meaning of Memory Safety
Arthur Azevedo de Amorim1
arXiv:1705.07354v2 [cs.PL] 16 Aug 2017
1
Cătălin Hrit, cu2
University of Pennsylvania
Abstract—We propose a rigorous characterization of what it
means for a programming language to be memory safe, capturing the intuition that memory safety supports local reasoning
about state. We formalize this principle in two different ways.
First, we show how a small memory-safe imperative language
validates a noninterference property: parts of the state that are
not reachable from a given part of the program can neither
affect nor be affected by its execution. Second, we show how to
take advantage of memory safety to extend separation logic, a
framework for reasoning about heap-manipulating programs,
with a variant of its frame rule. Our new rule is stronger
because it applies even when parts of the program are buggy
or malicious, but also weaker because it requires a stricter
form of separation between parts of the program state. We
also consider a number of pragmatically motivated variations
of memory safety and the reasoning principles they support. As
an application of our characterization, we evaluate the security
of a previously proposed dynamic monitor for memory safety
of heap-allocated data.
1
Introduction
Memory safety—and the plethora of catastrophic vulnerabilities that arise in its absence [46]—are common concerns
among system designers. But what is memory safety, exactly? Intuitions abound, but translating them into satisfying
formal definitions is surprisingly difficult [21].
In large part, this difficulty stems from the prominent
role that informal, everyday intuition assigns, in discussions
of memory safety, to a range of errors related to memory
misuse—buffer overruns, double frees, etc. Characterizing
memory safety in terms of the absence of these errors is
tempting, but this falls short for two reasons. First, there is
often disagreement on which behaviors qualify as errors. For
example, many real-world C programs intentionally rely on
unrestricted pointer arithmetic [30], although it may yield
undefined behavior according to the language standard [22,
§6.5.6]. Second, from the perspective of security, the critical
issue is not the errors themselves, but rather the fact that,
when such errors occur in unsafe languages like C, the
program’s ensuing behavior is determined by obscure, lowlevel factors such as the compiler’s choice of run-time memory layout, often leading to exploitable vulnerabilities. By
contrast, in memory-safe languages such as Java, programs
can still attempt to access arrays out of bounds, but such
mistakes lead to sensible, predictable outcomes.
2
Benjamin C. Pierce1
Inria Paris
Thus, rather than attempting a definition in terms of a
list of bad things that cannot happen, we aim to formalize
memory safety in terms of reasoning principles that programmers can soundly apply when coding in a memorysafe setting—or, conversely, that programmers should not
naively apply in non-memory-safe settings, because doing
so can lead to serious bugs and vulnerabilities. Specifically,
to give a formal account of memory safety, as opposed
to more inclusive terms such as “type safety,” we focus
on reasoning principles that are directly related to mutable state—i.e., those that are common to a wide range of
stateful abstractions, such as records, tagged or untagged
unions, local variables, closures, arrays, call stacks, objects,
compartments, and address spaces.
What sort of reasoning principles? One source of inspiration comes from separation logic [39], a formal system for
proving properties of programs that manipulate heap data
structures. Like Hoare logic and related systems, separation logic manipulates program specifications of the form
{p} c {q}, which roughly read as follows: if program
c is run on an initial heap that satisfies precondition p,
and c terminates, then the final heap satisfies postcondition
q . What makes separation logic special is local reasoning
about state: its proofs guarantee that programs access only
a limited region of the heap described by their pre- and
postconditions, while everything else is left untouched. This
discipline means that we can extend a program’s specification with arbitrary invariants about the rest of the heap, as
captured by a proof principle known as the frame rule
{p} c {q}
,
{p ∗ r} c {q ∗ r}
where p ∗ r is the so-called separating conjunction of the
assertions p and r. The rule can be read as follows: “Suppose
c satisfies the specification {p} c {q}—that is, if it is started
in a state where some part of the heap satisfies p, and c
terminates, then this part of the heap satisfies q . Then, if c
is started in an initial heap where some part satisfies p and
a disjoint part of the heap satisfies an arbitrary assertion r,
this second part will still satisfy r after c.”
The locality discipline imposed by separation logic is
closely related to typical guidelines for memory-safe programming such as avoiding out-of-bounds accesses, because
both restrict the potential effects of each piece of code to
a clearly delimited part of the heap. For example, if a jpeg
decoding subroutine is free of memory-safety violations and
we can see from the program text that it only has access
to the input and output image buffers, we know that the
decoder cannot tamper with other parts of the state.
We can express such program constraints as specifications in separation logic. For example, a simple specification
of the jpeg decoder might be {p} decoder {true}, where p
is a separation-logic assertion saying that the variables in
and out point to heap-allocated arrays of appropriate size.
This specification is quite loose, in that it does not guarantee
that the contents of the output buffer after running decoder
bear any particular relation to the contents of in beforehand;
however, it does imply that, whatever decoder does, it only
affects the part of the heap described by p. This means that
we can apply the frame rule to reason about the decoder’s
potential effects on the rest of the heap. For example, if
the next step after decoding is to render the contents of
the output buffer into a window object, and if this window
object is disjoint from the in and out buffers, then the
frame rule tells us that running decoder will not affect the
well-formedness of the window object. The frame rule thus
embodies a fundamental reasoning principle associated with
memory-safe programs.
An inherent characteristic of standard separation logic
is that safety is enforced manually: the program correctness
proof must show that each memory operation accesses only
the local state as described by its pre- and postconditions.
This is what makes separation logic useful for modular
reasoning in unsafe settings such as C: although any part
of a C program could, in principle, access any part of the
state, we can still reason locally about memory-safe programs. However, pervasive manual verification of the safety
of every memory access seems prohibitively expensive for
large code bases—especially in the presence of third-party
libraries or plugins, over which we have little control.
In a setting where memory safety is enforced automatically, we can do much better. Suppose that the jpeg decoder
above is a library written in Java. Even though we may
not know anything precise about its input-output behavior,
we can still correctly reason that running it cannot have
any effect on a window object that it cannot reference. A
simple reachability check showing that the window object is
inaccessible replaces the detailed reasoning about individual
memory operations demanded by separation logic. Our aim
in this paper is to formalize this kind of reasoning.
complementary strengths and weaknesses: while the original
rule applies to unsafe settings like C, but requires comprehensively verifying individual memory accesses, our variant
does not require proving that every access is correct, but
demands a stronger notion of separation between parts of the
program state. These results have been verified with the Coq
proof assistant; our machine checked proofs are available at:
https://github.com/arthuraa/memory-safe-language
Our second contribution (§4) is to evaluate pragmatically
motivated relaxations of the ideal notion of memory safety
discussed above. These models differ from the ideal one by
exploring various trade-offs between safety, performance,
flexibility, and backwards compatibility, or by taking physical aspects such as time into account. We argue that these
variants can be broadly classified into two groups according
to reasoning principles they support. The stronger group
gives up on some secrecy guarantees provided by memory
safety, but still ensures that pieces of code cannot modify the
contents of parts of the heap they do not have permission to
access with their pointers. The weaker group, on the other
hand, leaves gaps that completely invalidate reachabilitybased reasoning.
Our third contribution (§5) is to demonstrate how our
characterization can apply to more realistic settings, by analyzing the security of a recently proposed dynamic monitor
enforcing heap memory safety for low-level code [16], [6].
We prove that the abstract machine modeling the monitor
satisfies a noninterference property similar to the one we
show for the language of §2; then since the monitor is a
valid implementation of the abstract machine, it inherits
this noninterference property, modulo memory exhaustion
issues discussed in §4. These proofs are also done in
Coq and are available at: https://github.com/micro-policies/
micro-policies-coq/tree/master/memory safety
We discuss related work on memory safety and stronger
reasoning principles for similar enforcement mechanisms in
§6, and conclude in §7. While memory safety has been
formally investigated in the past (e.g. [33], [44]), our characterization is the first phrased in terms of reasoning principles
that are valid when memory safety is enforced automatically.
We thus hope that these reasoning principles can serve as
good criteria for formally evaluating practical mechanisms
for enforcing memory safety. Moreover, our definition is
directly targeted at memory safety and does not rely on
additional features such as full-blown capabilities, closures,
objects, module systems, etc. Since these features tend to
depend on some form of memory safety anyway, we could
see our characterization as a common core of reasoning
principles that underpin all of them.
Our first contribution is to formalize local reasoning
principles that are valid for an ideal notion of memory
safety, using a concrete imperative language as the basis
of our discussion (introduced in §2). We show three frame
theorems (Theorems 3.1, 3.3 and 3.4) that explain how the
execution of a piece of code is affected by extending the
heap on which it starts running. We use these results to
derive a noninterference property (Corollary 3.5), guaranteeing that code cannot affect or be affected by regions
of memory that it does not have the capability to access
through the pointers it possesses. In §3.4, we show how
these results yield a variant of the original frame rule
of separation logic (Theorem 3.7). The two variants have
2
An Idealized Memory-Safe Language
Our discussion of memory safety begins with a concrete case
study: a simple imperative language with manual memory
management. It features several mechanisms for controlling
the effects of memory misuse, ranging from the most conventional, such as bounds checking for spatial safety, to
2
Command
x←e
x ← [e]
[e1 ] ← e2
x ← alloc(e)
free(e)
skip
if e then c1 else c2
while e do c end
c1 ; c2
nents: a local store, which maps program variables to values,
and a heap, which maps pointers to values (Figure 2).
Pointers are not bare integers, but rather pairs (i, n) of a
block identifier i ∈ I and an offset n ∈ Z. The offset
is relative to the corresponding block, and the identifier i
need not bear any direct relation to the physical address that
might be used in a concrete implementation of this language
on a conventional flat-memory machine. (That is, we can
equivalently think of the heap as a map associating each
block identifier with a separate array of heap cells.) Similar
structured memory models are widely used in the literature,
as in the CompCert verified C compiler [28], for instance.
We write JcK(s) to denote the outcome of running a
program c in an initial state s; this outcome can be either a
successful final state s0 or a fatal run-time error. Note that
JcK is partial, to account for non-terminating computations.
Similarly, JeK(s) denotes the value resulting from evaluating
the expression e on the state s, where expression evaluation
is total and has no side effects. The formal definition of these
functions is left to the Appendix; we just single out here a
few aspects that will have a crucial effect on the security
properties discussed later.
Description
Assign to local variable
Read from heap location
Assign to heap location
Allocate heap block of size e
Free block starting at e
Do nothing
Conditional
Loop
Sequencing
Figure 1. Syntax
s∈S ,L×M
l ∈ L , var *fin V
(states)
(local stores)
m ∈ M , I × Z *fin V
(heaps)
v ∈ V , Z ] B ] {nil} ] I × Z
O , S ] {error}
(values)
(outcomes)
I , some countably infinite set
Illegal Memory Accesses Lead to Errors The language
controls the effect of various kinds of memory misuse by
treating them as run-time errors that stop execution as soon
as they occur. This contrasts with typical C implementations,
where such errors lead to unpredictable undefined behavior
in compiled code. The main errors are caused by reads,
writes, and frees to the current memory m using invalid
pointers—that is, pointers p such that m(p) is undefined.
Such pointers typically arise either by offsetting an existing
pointer outside its bounds or by freeing a structure on the
heap (which turns all other pointers to that block in the
program state into dangling ones). In common parlance, this
discipline ensures both spatial and temporal memory safety.
X *fin Y , partial functions X * Y with finite domain
Figure 2. Program states and values.
more uncommon ones, such as assigning unique identifiers
to every allocated block for ensuring temporal safety.
Choosing a language with manual memory management
may appear odd, given that memory safety is often associated with garbage collection. We made this choice for two
reasons. First, most of the discussion on memory safety is
motivated by its absence from low-level languages like C
that also rely on manual memory management. There is a
vast body of research that tries to reconcile such languages
with memory safety, and, as stated earlier, we hope that our
account can help inform it. Second, we wanted to stress
that our characterization does not depend fundamentally on
the mechanisms used to enforce memory safety, especially
because they might have complementary advantages and
shortcomings. For example, manual memory management
as done in C can lead to more memory leaks; running
with a garbage collector might result in slow, unpredictable
performance; and specialized type systems for managing
memory [44], [40] are more complex.
We begin by giving a brief overview of the language and
its semantics. In §3, we will explore the reasoning principles
enabled by its safety.
2.1
Block Identifiers are Capabilities Pointers can only be
used to access memory corresponding to their block identifiers, which effectively act as capabilities. Block identifiers
are set at allocation time, where they are chosen to be fresh
with respect to the entire current state (i.e., the new block
identifier is not associated with any pointers defined in the
current memory, stored in local variables, or stored on the
heap). Once assigned, identifiers are immutable, making it
impossible to fabricate a pointer to an allocated block out
of thin air. This can be seen, for instance, in the semantics
of addition and subtraction, which allow pointer arithmetic
but do not affect identifiers:
n1 + n2
if Jei K(s) = ni
(i, n + n ) if Je K(s) = (i, n )
1
2
1
1
Je1 + e2 K(s) ,
and
Je
K(s)
=
n
2
2
nil
otherwise
Language Overview
The syntax is summarized in Figure 1. Expressions e include
variables x ∈ var, numbers n ∈ Z, Booleans b ∈ B,
an invalid pointer nil, and various operations, both binary
(arithmetic, logic, etc.) and unary (extracting the offset of a
pointer). We write [e] for dereferencing the pointer e.
Programs operate on states consisting of two compo-
For simplicity, we stipulate that nonsensical combinations,
such adding two pointers together, simply result in the nil
value. A real implementation might represent block identifiers with hardware tags and use a monotonically increasing
3
We write blocks(s) for the set of block identifiers defined
in the memory of s:
counter to generate identifiers for new blocks (as done by
Dhawan et al. [16]; see §5.1); if enough tags are available,
we can assume that every identifier will be fresh.
blocks(l, m) , {i ∈ I | ∃n, (i, n) ∈ dom(m)}
Block Identifiers Cannot be Observed Because of the
freshness condition above, block identifiers can reveal information about the entire program state. For example, if they
are chosen according to a monotonic counter, knowing what
identifier was assigned to a new block allows us to deduce
how many allocations have been performed. A concrete
implementation would encounter similar issues related to the
choice of physical addresses where new blocks are allocated.
(Such issues are commonplace in systems that combine
dynamic allocation and information-flow control [13].) For
this reason, our language keeps identifiers opaque and inaccessible to programs; they can only be used to reference
values in memory, and nothing else. We discuss a more
permissive approach and its consequences in §4.2.
Note that hiding block identifiers doesn’t mean we have
to hide everything associated with a pointer: besides using
pointers to access memory, programs can also safely extract
their offsets and test if two pointers are equal (which only
happens if both their offsets and block identifiers are equal).
Our Coq development shows that it is also sound to access
the size of a memory block via a valid pointer.
We write ids(s) for the set of block identifiers appearing
somewhere in s:
ids(l, m) , blocks(l, m)
∪ {i | ∃x, n, l(x) = (i, n)}
∪ {i | ∃p, n, m(p) = (i, n)}
We write vars(s) for the set of local variables defined in
the state s,
vars(l, m) , dom(l),
and vars(c) for the set of local variables that occur in the
program c.
A permutation (of block identifiers) is a function π :
I → I that has a two-sided inverse π −1 ; that is,
π ◦ π −1 = π −1 ◦ π = idI .
Given a permutation π and a state s, we define a new
state π · s that is like s except that all of its identifiers are
renamed by π . The definition of this renaming operation is
straightforward.1
Finally, we write X # Y to indicate that sets X and Y
are disjoint: X ∩ Y = ∅.
New Memory is Always Initialized Whenever a memory
block is allocated, all of its contents are initialized to 0.
(The exact value does not matter, as long it is some constant
that is not a previously allocated pointer.) This is important
for ensuring that allocation does not leak secrets present in
previously freed blocks; we return to this point in §4.3.
3
3.2
The first frame theorem states that, if a program terminates
successfully when run on some initial state, then we can
extend that initial state without affecting execution.
Theorem 3.1 (Frame OK). Suppose that JcK(s1 ) = s01 , that
vars(c) ⊆ vars(s1 ), and that blocks(s1 ) # blocks(s2 ). Then
there exists a permutation π such that
Reasoning with Memory Safety
With this language definition in hand, we now turn to
the local reasoning principles that it supports. Intuitively,
these principles allow us to analyze the effect of a piece
of code by restricting our attention to a smaller portion of
the program state. A first set of frame theorems (3.1, 3.3,
and 3.4) describes how the execution of a piece of code
is affected by extending the initial state on which it runs.
These in turn imply a noninterference property, Corollary
3.5, guaranteeing that program execution is independent of
inaccessible memory regions—that is, those that correspond
to block identifiers that a piece of code does not possess.
Finally, in §3.4, we discuss how the frame theorems can be
recast in the language of separation logic, leading to a new
variant of its frame rule (Theorem 3.7).
3.1
Basic Properties of Memory Safety
JcK(s1 ∪ s2 ) = π · s01 ∪ s2
blocks(π · s01 ) # blocks(s2 ).
The second premise, vars(c) ⊆ vars(s1 ), guarantees that
all the variables needed to run c are already defined in s1 ,
implying that their values do not change once we extend
that initial state with s2 . The third premise, blocks(s1 ) #
blocks(s2 ), means that the memories of s1 and s2 store
disjoint regions. Finally, the conclusion of the theorem states
that (1) the execution of c does not affect the extra state s2
and (2) the rest of the result is almost the same as s01 , except
for a permutation of block identifiers.
Permutations are needed to avoid clashes between block
identifiers in s2 and those assigned to regions allocated
by c when running on s1 . For instance, suppose that the
execution of c on s1 allocated a new block, and that this
block was assigned some identifier i ∈ I. If the memory of
s2 already had a block corresponding to i, c would have
to choose a different identifier i0 for allocating that block
when running on s1 ∪ s2 . This change requires replacing all
occurrences of i by i0 in the result of the first execution,
Preliminaries
If s1 = (l1 , m1 ) and s2 = (l2 , m2 ) are program states, we
define a new state s1 ∪ s2 by taking the pointwise union
s1 ∪ s2 = (l1 , m1 ) ∪ (l2 , m2 ) , (l1 ∪ l2 , m1 ∪ m2 ),
where the (left-biased) union of finite partial functions is
(
f (x) if x ∈ dom(f )
(f ∪ g)(x) ,
g(x) otherwise;
1. It can be derived formally by viewing S as a nominal set over I [36],
[37] obtained by combining products, disjoint unions, and partial functions.
4
which can be achieved with a permutation that swaps these
two identifiers.2
The proof of Theorem 3.1 relies crucially on the facts
that programs cannot inspect block identifiers, that memory
can grow indefinitely (a common assumption in formal models of memory), and that memory operations only succeed
on valid pointers. Because of the renaming of identifiers,
we also need the following result, which shows that the
exact choice of block identifiers does not matter. Formally,
if we permute the initial state s of a command c with any
permutation π , we obtain the same outcome, up to some
additional permutation π 0 that again accounts for different
choices of fresh identifiers.
have no effect on its high-integrity outputs. In fact, both
guarantees apply to unreachable memory in our language:
the execution of a piece of code is independent of memory
regions that were already allocated when it started executing
but that it cannot access (because they are associated with
block identifiers that it does not possess). By “independent,”
we mean that the piece of code (1) cannot modify these
inaccessible regions (preserving their integrity), and (2)
cannot learn anything meaningful about these regions, not
even their presence (preserving their secrecy).
Corollary 3.5 (Noninterference). Let s1 , s21 , and s22 be
states and c a program. Suppose that vars(c) ⊆ vars(s1 ),
that ids(s1 ) # blocks(s21 ) and ids(s1 ) # blocks(s22 ). When
running c on the extended states s1 ∪ s21 and s1 ∪ s22 , there
is only one of the following three possibilities:
• Both executions loop: JcK(s1 ∪ s21 )=JcK(s1 ∪ s22 )=⊥;
• both executions terminate with an error:
JcK(s1 ∪ s21 ) = JcK(s1 ∪ s22 ) = error; or
• both executions successfully terminate without interfering with the inaccessible portions s21 and s22 . Formally, there exists a state s01 and permutations π1
and π2 such that JcK(s1 ∪ s2i ) = πi · s01 ∪ s2i and
ids(πi · s01 ) # blocks(s2i ), for i = 1, 2.
Theorem 3.2 (Renaming states). Let s be a state, c a
command, and π a permutation. There exists π 0 such that:
if JcK(s) = error
error
JcK(π · s) = ⊥
if JcK(s) = ⊥
π 0 · π · s0 if JcK(s) = s0
A similar line of reasoning yields a second frame theorem, which says that we cannot make a non-terminating
execution into a terminating one by extending its initial state.
Theorem 3.3 (Frame Loop).
Suppose JcK(s1 ) = ⊥, that vars(c) ⊆ vars(s1 ), and that
blocks(s1 ) # blocks(s2 ). Then JcK(s1 ∪ s2 ) = ⊥.
Proof. Consider the result of executing c on s1 . If JcK(s1 ) =
⊥, we apply Theorem 3.3 twice using s21 and s22 as the
unreachable states (recall that ids(s1 ) # blocks(s2i ) implies
blocks(s1 ) # blocks(s2i )). If JcK(s1 ) = error, it suffices to
apply Theorem 3.4 twice. And finally, if JcK(s1 ) = s01 , we
just apply Theorem 3.1 twice.
The third frame theorem shows that extending the initial
state also preserves erroneous executions. Its statement is
similar to the previous ones, but with a subtle twist. In
general by extending the state of a program with a new
block, we might turn an erroneous execution into a successful one—if the error was caused by accessing a pointer
whose identifier matches that new block. To avoid this, we
need a different premise (ids(s1 ) # blocks(s2 )) preventing
any pointers in the original state s1 from referencing the new
blocks in s2 —which is only useful because our language
prevents programs from forging pointers to existing regions.
Since blocks(s) ⊆ ids(s), this premise is stronger than the
analogous ones in the preceding results.
Noninterference is often formulated in terms of an indistinguishability relation on program states, which expresses
that one state can be obtained from the other by varying its secrets. We could have equivalently phrased the
above result in a similar way. Recall that the hypothesis
ids(s1 ) # blocks(s2 ) means that memory regions stored in
s2 are unreachable via s1 . Then, we could call two states
“indistinguishable” if the reachable portions are the same
(except for a possible renaming of block identifiers).
In §4, we will see that the connection with noninterference provides a good benchmark for comparing different
flavors of memory safety.
Theorem 3.4 (Frame Error).
Suppose that JcK(s1 ) = error, vars(c) ⊆ vars(s1 ), and
ids(s1 ) # blocks(s2 ). Then JcK(s1 ∪ s2 ) = error.
3.3
3.4
Memory Safety and Noninterference
Memory Safety and Separation Logic
We now explore the close connection between the principles
identified above, especially with respect to integrity, and the
local reasoning facilities of separation logic. In separation
logic, we are interested in proving specifications of the form
{p} c {q}, where p and q are predicates over program states
(subsets of S ). For our language, the meaning of such a
{p} c {q} specification could be roughly stated as
The consequences of memory safety we have analyzed so far
are intimately tied to the notion of noninterference [20] used
in information-flow control. In its most widely understood
sense, noninterference is a secrecy guarantee: varying the
secret inputs of a computation has no effect on its public
outputs. Sometimes, however, it is also used to describe
integrity guarantees: low-integrity inputs to a computation
∀s ∈ p, vars(c) ⊆ vars(s) ⇒ JcK(s) ∈ q ∪ {⊥}.
2. It would have been possible to use arbitrary functions from identifiers
to identifiers, instead of permutations; however, this would complicate some
of the statements, since we would have to prevent different identifiers from
aliasing after a renaming. Similar issues motivated the use of permutations
in the theory of nominal sets [36].
That is, if we start c in a state satisfying p, then the program
will either diverge or terminate in a final state that satisfies q ,
but it will not trigger a run-time error. Part of the motivation
5
becomes sound, since the true postcondition now means
that any outcome whatsoever is acceptable. Unfortunately,
there is a price to pay for allowing errors: they compromise
the soundness of the frame rule. The reason, intuitively, is
that preventing run-time errors has an additional purpose in
separation logic: it forces programs to act locally—that is,
to access only the parts of the heap that are described by
their pre- and postconditions. To see why, consider the same
program c as above, x ← [y]. This program clearly yields an
error when run on an empty heap, implying that the triple
for precluding errors is that in unsafe settings like C they
yield undefined behavior, destroying all hope of verification.
The power of separation logic for local reasoning and
modular verification comes from the frame rule, a consequence of Theorems 3.1 and 3.3. The rule intuitively says
that a verified program can only affect a well-defined portion
of the state, with all other memory regions left untouched.3
Theorem 3.6. Let p, q , and r be predicates over states and
c be a command. Suppose that
∀l1 l2 m, (∀x ∈
/ modvars(c), l1 (x) = l2 (x))
⇒ (l1 , m) ∈ r ⇒ (l2 , m) ∈ r,
{emp} c {x = 0}e
is valid, where the predicate emp holds of any state with
an empty heap and x = 0 holds of states whose local store
maps x to 0. Now consider what happens if we try to apply
an analog of the frame rule to this triple using the frame
predicate y 7→ 1, which holds in states where y contains a
pointer to the unique defined location on the heap, which
stores the value 1. After some simplification, we arrive at
the specification
where modvars(c) is the set of all variables that appear in
c as the destination of some assignment. (In other words,
suppose that r does not depend on the local variables
modified by c.) Then, the following rule is sound
{p} c {q}
F RAME
{p ∗ r} c {q ∗ r}
where p ∗ r denotes the separating conjunction of p and
r—the predicate over states defined as
{y 7→ 1} c {x = 0 ∧ y 7→ 1}e ,
{(l, m1 ∪ m2 ) | (l, m1 ) ∈ p, (l, m2 ) ∈ r,
blocks(l, m1 ) # blocks(l, m2 )}.
which clearly does not hold, since executing c on a state
satisfying the precondition leads to a successful final state
mapping x to 1.
To salvage the frame rule, we need to adapt it to take
errors into account. Fortunately, the reachability properties
of memory safety provide a solution: instead of enforcing
locality by preventing errors, we can take advantage of the
fact that memory operations in a memory-safe language
are automatically local—in particular, local to the block
identifiers that the program possesses.
Separation-logic specifications require that executions
terminate successfully (and satisfy the postcondition) or
diverge—memory errors are completely ruled out by proof.
However, this makes it difficult to use separation logic for
partial verification: proving any property, no matter how
simple, of a nontrivial program requires detailed reasoning
about its internals. Even the following seemingly vacuous
rule is unsound in separation logic:
{p} c {true}
Theorem 3.7. Under the same assumptions as Theorem 3.6,
the following rule is sound
TAUT
{p} c {q}e
S AFE F RAME
{p . r} c {q . r}e
For a counterexample, take p to be true and c to be some
arbitrary memory read x ← [y]. If we run this program on
an empty heap, which trivially satisfies the precondition, we
obtain an error, contradicting the meaning of the triple.
Fortunately, in our memory-safe language—in which
errorshave a sensible, predictable semantics, as opposed to
wild undefined behavior—we can formulate a variant of
separation logic that allows looser specifications. We now
consider specifications of the form {p} c {q}e , defined as
where p . r denotes the isolating conjunction of p and r,
defined as
{(l, m1 ∪ m2 ) | (l, m1 ) ∈ p, (l, m2 ) ∈ r,
ids(l, m1 ) # blocks(l, m2 )}.
Intuitively, the isolating conjunction guarantees that the
heap fragment satisfying r is unreachable from the rest of
the program state. The proof is very similar to the one
for the original frame rule, but it relies on Theorem 3.4
in addition to Theorems 3.1 and 3.3 (which is the reason
why the separating conjunction is not enough).
∀s ∈ p, vars(c) ⊆ vars(s) ⇒ JcK(s) ∈ q ∪ {⊥, error}.
These specifications are weaker than their conventional
counterparts presented above, leading to a subsumption rule:
{p} c {q}
{p} c {q}e
3.5
Because errors are no longer prevented, the TAUT rule
{p} c {true}e
Discussion
As hinted by their connection with the frame rule, the frame
theorems of §3.2 can themselves be considered as a form of
local reasoning: to reason about a command, it suffices to
restrict attention to the parts of the state that it can reach.
Furthermore, the only thing we have to do is to calculate
what this reachable portion is; how the program uses it is not
TAUT
3. Technically, the proof of the frame rule requires a slightly stronger
notion of specification, accounting for permutations of allocated identifiers;
our Coq development has a more precise statement.
6
important. In a more realistic language, reachability might
be inferred automatically from additional information such
as typing. But even here it can probably be accomplished
by a simple check of the program text.
For example, consider the hypothetical jpeg decoder
from §1. As discussed there, we would like to guarantee
that the decoder cannot tamper with an object that it cannot
reference—a window object, a whitelist of trusted websites,
etc. The frame theorems give us a means to do so, provided
that we are able to show that the object is indeed unreachable. The noninterference result additionally implies that the
jpeg decoder cannot directly extract any information from
these unreachable objects, such as passwords or private keys.
Many real-world attacks involve direct violations of
the reasoning principles we have articulated. For example,
consider the infamous Heartbleed attack on OpenSSL [17],
which used out-of-bounds reads from a buffer to leak data
from completely unrelated parts of the program state—
potentially stealing sensitive information like private keys.
Given that the code fragment that enabled that attack was
just manipulating an innocuous array, a programmer could
easily be fooled into believing (as probably many have) that
that snippet could not possibly access sensitive information,
allowing that vulnerability to remain unnoticed for years.
Finally, our new frame rule only captures the fact that a
command cannot influence the heap locations that it cannot
reach, while our noninterference result (Corollary 3.5) captures not just this integrity aspect of memory safety, but also
a secrecy aspect. We hope that future research will explore
the connection between the secrecy aspect of memory safety
and (relational) program logics.
4
reasoning principles and security guarantees of §3. Some
relaxations, such as allowing pointers to be forged out of
thin air, completely give up on the strong reachabilitybased reasoning we proposed above. Others, however, retain
strong reasoning principles for integrity while giving up
on some secrecy, allowing aspects of the global state of
a program to be observed. For example, a system with
finite memory (§4.5) may leak some information about
its total memory consumption, and a system that allows
pointer-to-integer casts (§4.2) may leak information about its
memory layout. Naturally, the distinction between integrity
and secrecy should be taken with a grain of salt, since the
former depends on the latter in many practical situations; for
example, if a system grants privileges to change the state of
some component when accessed with the right password, a
secrecy violation can be escalated to an integrity violation!
4.1
Forging Pointers
Many real-world C programs rely on using integers as
pointers. If this idiom is permitted without restrictions, then
robust local reasoning is compromised, since every part of
memory might be reachable by any part of the program. It
is thus not surprising that systems that strive for memory
safety either prevent this kind of pointer forging or else
restrict it to well-delimited unsafe fragments.
More insidiously, and perhaps surprisingly, similar dangers also lurk in the stateful abstractions even of some
systems that are widely regarded as “memory safe.” In
JavaScript, for example, it is possible for code to access
arbitrary global variables by indexing an associative array
with a string, a feature that enables many serious attacks [1],
[19], [47], [31]. One might argue that global variables in
JavaScript are “memory unsafe” because they fail to validate
local reasoning: the fact that a particular part of a JavaScript
program does not explicitly mention a given global variable
does not imply that running this code cannot change this
variable or the things it points to. Re-enabling local reasoning requires imposing very strong restrictions on the allowed
programming style [10], [1], [19].
Relaxing Memory Safety
So much for formalism. What about reality?
Strictly speaking, the strong security properties we have
formulated above do not hold in any real system. This is
partly due to fundamental physical limitations—real systems
run with finite memory, and they interact with their users
in various ways that transcend inputs and outputs, notably
through time. A more interesting reason is that real systems
typically do not impose all the restrictions we have relied
on for the proofs of these properties. Languages that aim to
be memory safe generally offer relatively benign glimpses
of their implementation details (such as being able to read
the previous contents of uninitialized memory, compare
pointers with ≤, or extract physical addresses from pointers)
in return for significant performance or flexibility gains in
some situations. In other systems, the concessions are more
fundamental, to the extent that it is harder to clearly delimit
what part of a program is unsafe: the SoftBound transformation [33], for example, adds spatial memory-safety checks
for C programs, but does not provide protection against
bugs caused by erroneous uses of free by itself; a related
transformation, CETS [34], is required to enforce temporal
memory safety.
In this section, we enumerate some common relaxed
models of memory safety and evaluate how they affect the
4.2
Observing Pointers
The language of §2 maintains a complete separation between
pointers and other kinds of values. In real systems, this
separation is often only enforced in one direction. For
example, some tools for enforcing memory safety of C
programs [33], [14] allow pointer-to-integer casts [25], a
feature required by many low-level C idioms [11], [30].
Additionally, languages considered as memory safe often
include features that break this separation—e.g., the default
implementation of hashCode() in Java. To model such
features, we can extend the syntax of expressions with a
cast operator
e ::= · · · | cast(e) | · · ·
and assume that we have some function JcastK : I × Z → Z
for converting a pointer to an integer, which we use to define
7
the semantics of cast:
Jcast(e)K(s) = JcastK(JeK(s))
and block identifiers into account to test if two pointers
are equal. For performance reasons, we could have chosen
a different design that only compares pointers using their
physical addresses at run time, completely discarding block
identifiers. If attackers know the physical address of a
pointer that they own—which could happen, for instance,
if they know that pointer was the first to be allocated, and
know enough about the implementation of the allocator to
determine where that pointer will live—they can use pointer
arithmetic (which is generally harmless and allowed in our
language) to discover the address of other pointers. If x
holds the pointer they control, they can run, for instance,
if JeK(s) ∈ I × Z
Note that the language we introduced originally included
an offset operator for extracting the offset of a pointer.
Their definitions are similar, but have crucially different
consequences: while offset does not depend on the block
identifier, allocation order, or other low-level details of the
language implementation (such as the choice of physical
addresses when allocating a block), all of these could be
relevant when defining the semantics of cast. The three
frame theorems (3.1, 3.3, and 3.4) are thus lost, because the
state of unreachable parts of the heap may influence integers
observed by the program. An important consequence is that
the secrecy is weakened in this language: an attacker could
exploit pointers as a side-channel to learn secrets about data
it doesn’t have direct access to.
Nevertheless, we can still guarantee the integrity of
unreachable parts of the program state: if a program does
not hold any pointers to an allocated block, the contents of
that block will not change at the end of the execution. (This
result was also proved in Coq.)
y ← alloc(1); if x + 1729 = y then . . . else . . . ,
to learn the location of the new pointer assigned to y , and
thus draw conclusions about the global state of the program.
4.3
Uninitialized Memory
Traditionally, memory-safe languages require variables and
objects to be initialized before they are used. But this can
degrade performance for some applications, leading many
systems to drop this feature—including not only standard
implementations of C, but also implementations that provide
some memory-safety guarantees [33], [14]. Even languages
that emphasize safety allow access to uninitialized memory in some cases—e.g., OCaml’s Bytes.create primitive,
Node.js’s Buffer.allocUnsafe.
The problem with uninitialized memory is that it breaks
the abstraction of the program state as consisting solely
of the local variables and allocated objects: the entire
memory becomes relevant to the execution of a program,
and reasoning locally becomes much harder. By inspecting
old values living in uninitialized memory, an attacker can
learn about parts of the program state they shouldn’t have
access to, a direct violation of secrecy. This issue would
become even more severe in a hypothetical system that
allowed old pointers or other capabilities to occur in reallocated memory in a way that the program can use,
since they could yield access to restricted resources directly,
leading to potential integrity violations as well. (The two
examples given above—OCaml’s Bytes.create primitive
and Node.js’s Buffer.allocUnsafe—do not suffer from
this issue, because any preexisting pointers in re-allocated
memory are treated as bare bytes that cannot be used to
access memory.)
Theorem 4.1 (Integrity-only Noninterference). Let s1 , s2 ,
and s0 be states and c a command such that vars(c) ⊆
vars(s1 ), ids(s1 ) # blocks(s2 ), and JcK(s1 ∪ s2 ) = s0 . Then
we can find s01 ∈ S such that s0 = s01 ∪ s2 and ids(s01 ) #
blocks(s2 ).
The crucial difference between this and the stronger
noninterference result of Corollary 3.5 is that, if pointerto-integer casts are prohibited, we know that changing the
contents of the unreachable portion s2 has no effect on
the reachable portion, s01 . If these casts are allowed, then
changing s2 can influence s01 in arbitrary ways: not only
can the contents of this final state change, but the execution
can also loop forever or terminate in an error.
To understand why this is the case, consider the jpeg
decoder of §1. Suppose that the decoder is being used inside
of a web browser, but that it does not have the required
pointers to learn the address that the user is currently visiting. Suppose that there is some relation between the memory
consumption of the program and that website, and that there
is some correlation between the memory consumption and
the identifier assigned to a new block. Then, by allocating
a new block and converting it to a integer, the decoder
might be able to infer useful information about the website
that the user is visiting [23]. Thus, if s2 denoted the part
of the browser’s state responsible for storing that location,
changing its contents would have a nontrivial effect on s01 ,
the part of the state that the decoder does have access to.
We could speculate that, in a reasonable system, this channel
can only reveal information about the layout of unreachable
regions, and not their contents. Indeed, we conjecture this for
the variant of our language considered in this sub-section.
Finally, it is worth mentioning that simply excluding
the cast operation from the language might not be enough
for preventing this sort of secrecy violations in practice.
For instance, recall that our language takes both offsets
4.4
Dangling Pointers and Freshness
Another crucial issue is the treatment of dangling pointers—
those that reference objects that have already been freed.
Dangling pointers are problematic because there is an inherent tension between giving them a sensible semantics
(for instance, one that validates the properties of §3) and
obtaining good performance and predictability. Languages
with garbage collection avoid the issue by ensuring that
dangling pointers never occur—heap storage is freed only
when there are no pointers to it left. In the simple language
from §2, besides giving a well-defined behavior to the use
of dangling pointers (aborting execution with an error), we
8
imposed strong freshness requirements in the allocation rule,
mandating not only that the identifier assigned to the new
block not correspond to any existing block, but also that it
not be present anywhere else in the program state.
To see how the results of §3 are affected in a setting
where freshness is not enforced, consider the program
entire state of the program—not just its reachable portions.
How problematic this is in practice, however, will depend
on the particular system under consideration.
A potential solution is to force programs that run out of
memory to terminate immediately—for example, by making alloc in our language cause an execution error if an
outOfMemory predicate holds of the current program state.
Though this choice might be bad from an availability standpoint, it is probably the most benign in terms of secrecy.
We should be able to prove an error-insensitive variant of
Corollary 3.5, where the only significant interaction that
unreachable memory can have with a piece of code is to
turn a successful execution or infinite loop into an error, or
vice versa. Similar issues arise for information-flow mechanisms that often cannot prevent secrets from influencing the
termination behavior of programs, leading to terminationinsensitive notions of noninterference.
Unfortunately, even an error-insensitive result might be
too strong for real systems, which often make it possible
for attackers to extract multiple bits of information about
the global state of the program—something that had already
been noted in the information-flow literature [5]. Java, for
example, does not force termination when memory runs out,
but triggers an exception that can be caught and handled by
user code, which is then free to record the event and probe
the allocator with a different test. And most languages do
not operate in batch mode like ours does, merely producing
a single answer at the end of execution; rather, their programs continuously interact with their environment through
inputs and outputs, allowing them to communicate the exact
amount of memory that caused an error.
This discussion suggests that, if size vulnerabilities are
a real concern for a system, they need to be treated with
special care. One approach would be to use a mechanism
to limit the amount of memory an untrusted component can
allocate [50], so that exhausting the memory allotted to that
component doesn’t reveal information about the state of the
rest of the system (and so that also global denial-of-service
attacks are prevented). A more speculative idea is to develop
quantitative versions [42], [7] of the noninterference results
discussed here, allowing us to analyze the behavior of a
program on an extended state only if the total memory used
by the program is below a certain limit.
x ← alloc(1); z ← (y = x),
and suppose we run it on a state where y holds a dangling
pointer. Depending on the behavior of the allocator and the
state of the memory, the pointer assigned to x could be
equal to y . Since this outcome depends on the entire state
of the system, not just the reachable memory, Theorems 3.1,
3.3 and 3.4 now fail. Furthermore, an attacker with detailed
knowledge of the allocator implementation could potentially
launder secret information by testing pointers for equality.
Weakening freshness guarantees can also have implications
for integrity, since it becomes much harder to guarantee
that memory blocks are properly isolated. For instance, a
newly allocated block might be reachable through a dangling
pointer that is controlled by an attacker, allowing them to
access that block even if they were not supposed to.
Some practical solutions for memory safety use mechanisms similar to our language’s, where each memory location is tagged with an identifier describing the region it belongs to [12], [16]. Pointers are tagged similarly, and when
a pointer is used to access memory, a violation is detected
if its identifier does not match the location’s. However,
for performance reasons, the number of possible identifiers
might be limited to a relatively small number, such as 2 or
4 [12] or 16 [49]. In addition to the problems above, since
multiple live regions can share the same identifier in such
schemes, it might be possible for buffer overflows to lead
to violations of secrecy and integrity as well.
Although we framed our discussion in terms of block
identifiers, the issue of freshness can manifest itself in other
ways. For example, many systems for spatial memory safety
work by enriching pointers with base and bounds information. In some of these [14], [33], dealing with dangling
pointers is treated as an orthogonal issue, and it is possible
for the allocator to return a new memory region that overlaps
with the range of a dangling pointer, in which case the new
region will not be properly isolated from the rest of the state.
Finally, dangling pointers can have disastrous consequences for overall system security, independently of the
freshness issues just described: freeing a pointer more than
once can break allocator invariants, enabling attacks [46].
4.5
4.6
Side-channel Attacks
As often done in the information-flow control literature, our
noninterference result assumes the code does not use sidechannels to learn information about unreachable memory
regions. In practice, a malicious piece of code (e.g., a plugin)
may infer secret information from the unreachable memory
regions by for instance observing differences in its execution
time caused by the contents of processor caches, which are
normally shared by all the code. While the attacker model
considered in this paper does not try to address such sidechannel attacks, one should be able to use the previous
research on the subject to protect against them or limit the
damage they can cause [42], [7], [52], [43].
Infinite Memory
Our idealized language allows memory to grow indefinitely.
But real languages run on finite-memory machines, and cannot allocate new memory when programs run out of space.
Besides enabling denial-of-service attacks, finite memory
has consequences for the secrecy properties studied earlier.
Corollary 3.5 does not hold in a real programming language
as is, because an increase in memory consumption can cause
a previously successful allocation to fail. By noticing this
difference, a piece of code could learn something about the
9
5
Case Study: A Memory-safety Monitor
Nop, Const w rd , Mov rs rd , Binop⊕ r1 r2 rd ,
Load rp rd , Store rp rs , Jump r, Jal r, Bnz r w, Halt
To demonstrate the applicability of our proposed characterization, we use it to evaluate the security guarantees of a
tag-based dynamic monitor recently proposed by Dhawan et
al. to enforce heap memory safety for low-level code [16].
Prior work by Azevedo de Amorim et al. [6] has shown
formally that a model of the monitor running on a idealized
tag-based architecture correctly implements a higher-level
abstract machine with built-in checks for memory safety—a
bit more formally, every behavior of the monitor is also a behavior of the abstract machine. Building upon this work, we
prove that this abstract machine satisfies a noninterference
property similar to Corollary 3.5. We were also able to prove
that a similar result holds for a lower-level machine that
runs a so-called “symbolic” representation of the monitor—
although we had to slightly weaken the result to account for
memory exhaustion (cf. §4.5), since the machine that runs
the monitor has finite memory, while the abstract machine
has infinite memory. If we had a verified machine-code
implementation of this monitor, it would be possible to prove
a similar result for it as well.
5.1
Figure 3. Instructions of the memory-safe abstract machine. Variables r
range over registers, variables w range over constant words, and ⊕ ranges
over a set of binary operators that includes basic arithmetic, logic, etc.
pc ∈ V is the program counter.
The execution of the machine is specified by a stepping
relation: s → s0 means that running a single instruction on
the machine at state s yields a new state s0 . If there is no s0
such that s → s0 , we say that s is stuck, which means that
a fatal error occurred during execution.
On every instruction, the machine checks if the current
program counter is a pointer and, if so, tries to fetch the
corresponding value in memory. The machine then ensures
that this value is a word that correctly encodes an instruction
and, if so, acts accordingly. The instructions of the machine,
representative of typical RISC architectures, are summarized in Figure 3. Programs can perform binary operations
(Binop), move values to and from memory (Load, Store),
and branch (Jump, Jal, Bnz). The machine is in fact fairly
similar to the language of §2. Some binary operations are
overloaded to manipulate pointers; for example, adding a
pointer to a word is allowed, and the result is obtained by adjusting the pointer’s offset accordingly. Accessing memory
causes the machine to halt when the corresponding position
is undefined.
In addition to these basic instructions, the machine possesses a set of special monitor services that can be invoked
by user code as regular functions, using registers to pass in
arguments and return values. There are two services alloc
and free for managing memory, and one service eq for
testing whether two values are equal. The reason for using
separate monitor services instead of special instructions is to
keep its semantics closer to the more concrete machine that
implements it. While the instruction set includes an equality
test, this instruction cannot replace the eq service, since it
only takes physical addresses into account. As argued in
§4.2, such physical address comparisons can be turned into a
side channel: comparing out-of-bounds pointers to different
blocks reveals information about the global state of the
allocator. To prevent this, testing two pointers for equality
directly using the corresponding machine instruction results
in an error if the pointers have different block identifiers.
•
Tag-based Monitor
We content ourselves with a brief overview of Dhawan et
al.’s monitor [16], [6], since the formal statement of noninterference for it is more complex than the one for the
abstract machine from §5.2, on which we will focus.
Following a proposal by Clause et al. [12], Dhawan et
al.’s monitor enforces memory safety for heap-allocated
data by checking and propagating metadata tags. Every
memory location receives a tag that uniquely identifies
the allocated region to which that location belongs (akin
to block identifiers in §2), and pointers receive the tag
of the region they are allowed to reference. The monitor
assigns these tags to new regions by storing a monotonic
counter in protected memory that is bumped on every call to
malloc; with a large number of possible tags, it is possible
to avoid the freshness pitfalls discussed in §4.4. When a
memory access occurs, the monitor checks whether the tag
on the pointer matches the tag on the location. If they
do, the operation is allowed; otherwise, execution halts.
The monitor instruments the allocator to make set up tags
correctly. Its implementation achieves good performance
using the PUMP, a hardware extension accelerating such
micro-policies for metadata tagging [16].
5.2
5.3
Abstract Machine
Verifying Memory Safety
The proof of memory safety for this abstract machine mimics the one carried for the language in §3. We use similar
notations as before: π · s means renaming every identifier
that appears in s according to the permutation π , and ids(s)
is the finite set of all identifiers that appear in the state s.
A simple case analysis on the possible instructions yields
analogs of Theorems 3.1, 3.2 and 3.4 (we don’t include an
analog of Theorem 3.3 because there isn’t a corresponding
notion of looping for this machine). We show single-step
versions for simplicity, but the results generalize easily to
multiple steps.
The abstract machine of Azevedo de Amorim et al. [6]
operates on two kinds of values: machine words w, or
pointers (i, w), which are pairs of an identifier i ∈ I and
a machine word offset w. We use W to denote the set of
machine words, and V to denote the set of values. Machine
states are triples (m, rs, pc), where
∗
• m ∈ I *fin V is a memory, which maps identifiers to
lists of values (frames);
• rs ∈ R *fin V is a register bank, mapping registers
(elements of a finite set R) to values; and
10
Theorem 5.1. Let π be a permutation, and s and s0 be
two machine states such that s → s0 . There exists another
permutation π 0 such that π · s → π 0 · s0 .
state abstractions to the mechanism itself. Besides variables
and call stacks, if the mechanism made code immutable
and separate from data, a simple check would suffice to
tell whether a code segment stored in memory references a
given privileged register. If the register is the only means
of reaching a memory region, we should be able to soundly
infer that that code segment is independent of that region.
On a last note, although the abstract machine we verified
is fairly close to our original language, the dynamic monitor
that implements it using tags is quite different (§5.1). In
particular, the monitor works on a machine that has a
flat memory model, and keeps track of free and allocated
memory using a protected data structure that stores base
and bounds information associated with every block. It
was claimed that reasoning about this base and bounds
information was the most challenging part of the proof
that the monitor implements the abstract machine [6]. For
this reason, we believe that this proof can be adapted to
other enforcement mechanisms that rely solely on base
and bounds information—for example, fat pointers [27],
[14] or SoftBound [33]—while keeping a similar abstract
machine as their specification, and thus satisfying a similar
noninterference property. This gives us confidence that our
memory safety characterization generalizes to other settings.
Theorem 5.2. Let (m1 , rs, pc) be a state of the abstract
machine, and m2 a memory. Suppose that ids(m1 , rs, pc) #
dom(m2 ), and that (m1 , rs, pc) → (m0 , rs 0 , pc 0 ). Then,
there exists a permutation π such that
ids(π · m0 , π · rs, π · pc) # dom(m2 ) and
(m2 ∪ m1 , rs, pc) → (m2 ∪ π · m0 , π · rs 0 , π · pc 0 ).
Theorem 5.3. Let (m1 , rs, pc) be a state of the abstract
machine, and m2 a memory. Suppose that ids(m1 , rs, pc) #
dom(m2 ), and that (m1 , rs, pc) is stuck. Then (m2 ∪
m1 , rs, pc) is also stuck.
Once again, by combining these properties, we obtain a
proof of noninterference.
Corollary 5.4 (Noninterference). Let s = (m1 , rs, pc) be
a state, and m21 and m22 two memories. Suppose that
ids(m1 , rs, pc) # dom(m2i ) for i = 1, 2. When trying to
run s by adding the extra memories m2i , only the following
two possibilities can arise.
• Both (m21 ∪ m1 , rs, pc) and (m22 ∪ m1 , rs, pc) are
stuck; or
• both states successfully step without interfering with
the inaccessible portions m21 and m22 . Formally, there
exists a state s0 = (m0 , rs 0 , pc 0 ), and permutations π1
and π2 such that
6
(m2i ∪m1 , rs, pc) → (m21 ∪πi ·m0 , πi ·rs 0 , πi ·pc) and
Characterizing Memory Safety Many formal characterizations of memory safety originated in attempts to reconcile
its benefits with low-level languages and systems. Generally,
these works claim that a mechanism enforces memory safety
by showing that it prevents or catches typical temporal
and spatial violations. Examples in the literature include:
Cyclone [44], a language featuring a region-based type
system for safe manual memory management; CCured [35],
a program transformation that adds temporal memory safety
to C by refining its pointer type to distinguish between
various degrees of safety; Ivory [18] an embedding of a
similar “safe-C type system” into Haskell; SoftBound [33],
an instrumentation technique for C programs for enforcing
spatial memory safety, including the detection of bounds
violations within an object; CETS [34], a compile-time
pass for preventing temporal memory-safety violations in
C programs, including accessing dangling pointers into
freed heap regions and stale stack frames; the tag-based
memory-safety monitor for the PUMP [16], [6], which
formed the basis of our case study in §5; and languages
like Mezzo [38] and Rust [48], whose guarantees extend to
preventing data races [8]. Similar models of memory errors
appear in popular formalizations of C [28], [26], which need
to rigorously characterize sources of undefined behavior in
the language—in particular, instances of memory misuse.
Either explicitly or implicitly, these works define memory errors as attempts to use a pointer to access a memory
ids(πi · s0 ) # dom(m2i ), for i = 1, 2.
5.4
Related Work
The present work lies at the intersection of two areas of previous research: one on formal characterizations of memory
safety, the other on reasoning principles for programs. We
review the most closely related work in these areas.
Discussion
This noninterference result for the memory-safety monitor
has an important difference compared to the original one
(Corollary 3.5). In the memory-safe language, the notion
of memory reachability is relative to a program’s local
variables. If we want to argue that part of the state is kept
isolated from some code fragment, we just have to consider
that fragment’s local variables—other parts of the program
are still allowed to access the region. The memory-safety
monitor, on the other hand, does not have an analogous
notion: if a memory region becomes unreachable it becomes
useless, since it will remain unreachable forever.
It seems that, from the standpoint of noninterference,
heap memory safety taken in isolation is much weaker
than the guarantees it provides in the presence of other
linguistic features, such as local variables. Nevertheless,
the properties studied above suggest several possibilities
that we could explore for strengthening the mechanism and
making its guarantees more useful. The most obvious one
would be to use the mechanism as the target of a compiler
for a programming language that provides additional (safe)
abstractions for managing state, such as variables and a
stack for procedure calls. A more modest approach from the
point of view of formal verification would be to add other
11
location that it was not meant to access—for example, a
location that lies past its bounds, or one that has already been
freed. This aspect was noted by Hicks [21], who, inspired
by the work on SoftBound, proposed to define memory
safety as an execution model that tracks to what part of
memory each pointer has access. Our characterization is
complementary to these accounts, in that it is extensional:
its data isolation properties allow us to reason directly about
program observable behavior. Furthermore, as demonstrated
by our application to the monitor of §5 and the discussions
on §4, it can be easily adapted to various enforcement
mechanisms and variations of memory safety.
component, one must argue explicitly that the invariants we
care about are preserved by the privileged operations of that
component; memory safety, on the other hand, guarantees
that any invariants on unreachable parts of the memory are
automatically preserved.
Maybe closer related to our work, Maffeis et al. [29]
show that languages that satisfy their notion of “authority
safety” guarantee isolation, in the sense that a component’s
actions cannot influence the actions of another component
with disjoint authority. Their notion of authority behaves
similarly to the set of block identifiers accessible by a
program in our language; however, they do not attempt to
connect their notion of isolation to the frame rule, noninterference, or traditional notions of memory safety.
Morrisett et al. [32] state a correctness criterion for
garbage collection based on program equivalence. Some of
the properties they study are again similar to the frame rule,
in that they describe the behavior of code running in an
extended heap. However, they use this analysis to justify the
validity of erasing unreachable state, rather than studying the
possible interactions between the extra state and the program
in terms of integrity and secrecy.
Other works attempt to characterize protection schemes
that are weaker than full memory safety. Juglaret et al. [24]
propose a correctness criterion for compiling compartmentalized programs, which allows memory-safety violations
to occur within each compartment, but bounds the effect
of such violations on other compartments of the program.
Their criterion is reminiscent of the traditional notion of
full abstraction, which guarantees that contextually equivalent programs remain equivalent after compilation. Abadi
and Plotkin [2] develop an address-space randomization
scheme for a simple compiler, and prove a probabilistic
full-abstraction result for it. While full abstraction and related properties guarantee that certain security properties of
programs are preserved by compilation, these works do not
consider whether these properties encompass the type of
isolation guarantee analyzed here.
Reasoning Principles Separation logic [39], [51] has been
an important source of inspiration for our work. The logic’s
frame rule enables its local reasoning capabilities and imposes restrictions that are similar to those mandated by
memory-safe programming guidelines. As discussed in §3.4,
our reasoning principles are reminiscent of the frame rule,
but use pointer reachability to guarantee access locality in
settings where memory safety is enforced automatically. In
separation logic, by contrast, locality needs to be guaranteed
for each program individually by comprehensive proofs.
Several works have investigated similar reasoning principles for a variety of program analysis techniques, including
static, dynamic, manual, or a mixture of those. Some of
these are formulated as expressive logical relations associated with types, guaranteeing that programs are compatible
with the framing of state invariants; representative works
include: L3 [4], a linear calculus featuring strong updates
and aliasing control; the work of Benton and Tabereau [9]
on a compiler for a simple higher-order language; and the
work of Devriese et al. [15] on object capabilities for a
JavaScript-like language. Other developments are based on
proof systems reminiscent of separation logic with rules that
guarantee isolation; these include Yarra [41], an extension
of C that allows programmers to protect the integrity of data
structures marked as critical; the work of Agten et al. [3],
which allows mixing unverified and verified components by
instrumenting the program to check that required assertions
hold at interfaces; and the logic of Swasey et al. [45] for
reasoning about object-capability patterns.
Unlike our work, these works do not propose to use
reachability-based isolation to define memory safety in a
general setting, nor do they attempt to analyze how the
reasoning principles they identify are affected by common
variants of memory safety. Furthermore, many of these other
reasoning principles—especially the logical relations—rely
on encapsulation mechanisms such as closures, objects,
or modules that go beyond plain memory safety. Memory safety only allows us to fully isolate state components, while encapsulation provides finer control, allowing
some interaction between components, while guaranteeing
the preservation of certain invariants associated with them.
In this sense, one can see memory-safety reasoning as a
special case of encapsulation reasoning. Nevertheless, it
is a practically relevant special case that is interesting on
its own, since when code makes use of an encapsulated
7
Conclusions and Future Work
We have explored the consequences of memory safety for
reasoning about programs, formalizing intuitive principles
that, we argue, capture the essential distinction between
memory-safe systems and memory-unsafe ones. We showed
how the reasoning principles we identified apply to a recent
dynamic monitor for heap memory safety of low-level code.
The systems studied in this paper have a simple storage
model: the language of §2 has just global variables and flat,
heap-allocated arrays, while the monitor of §5 doesn’t even
have variables or immutable code. Realistic programming
platforms, of course, offer much richer stateful abstractions,
including, for example, procedures with stack-allocated local variables as well as structured objects with contiguously
allocated sub-objects. In terms of memory safety, these systems have a richer vocabulary for describing resources that
programs can access, and programmers could benefit from
isolation-based local reasoning involving these resources.
12
For example, in a memory-safe language with procedures and stack variables, it should be possible to assert that
the behavior of a procedure depends only on the arguments
that it is given, the global variables it uses, and the portions
of the state that are reachable from these values; if the
caller of that procedure has a private object that is not
passed as an argument, it should not affect or be affected
by the call. Additionally, languages such as C allow for
objects consisting of contiguously allocated sub-objects for
improved performance. Some systems [33], [14] add spatial
memory safety to C while allowing programmers to downgrade capabilities—that is, narrow the range of a pointer
so that it can’t be used to access outside of a sub-object’s
bounds. It would be interesting to refine our idealized model
of memory safety to take into account the reasoning enabled
by these features. In the case of the monitor of §5, such
considerations could lead to improved monitor designs or
to incorporating the monitor inside a secure compiler.
Conversely, it would be interesting to derive finer security properties for relaxations of memory safety like the
ones discussed in §4. Some inspiration could come from
the information-flow literature, where quantitative noninterference results provide bounds on the probability that some
secret is leaked, the rate at which it is leaked, how many
bits are leaked, etc. [7], [42].
The main goal of this work was to understand, formally,
the benefits of memory safety for informal and partial
reasoning, and to evaluate a variety of weakened forms of
memory safety in terms of which reasoning principles they
preserve. However, our approach may also suggest ways in
which formal verification using proof assistants might be
improved. One promising idea is to leverage the guarantees
of memory safety to obtain formal proofs of program correctness modulo unverified code that could have errors, in
contexts where complete verification is too expensive or not
possible (e.g., for programs with a plugin mechanism).
⊕ ::= + | × | − | = | ≤ | and | or
(operators)
e ::= x ∈ var | b ∈ B | n ∈ Z
(expressions)
|
e1 ⊕ e2 | not e | offset e | nil
c ::= skip | c1 ; c2
(commands)
|
if e then c1 else c2
|
while e do c end
|
x ← e | x ← [e] | [e1 ] ← e2
|
x ← alloc(e) | free(e)
s∈S ,L×M
l ∈ L , var *fin V
(states)
(local stores)
m ∈ M , I × Z *fin V
(heaps)
v ∈ V , Z ] B ] {nil} ] I × Z
O , S ] {error}
(values)
(outcomes)
I , some countably infinite set
X *fin Y , partial functions X * Y with finite domain
Figure 4. Syntax and program states
JxK(l, m) ,
(
l(x)
nil
if x ∈ dom(l)
otherwise
JbK(s) , b
JnK(s) , n
JnilK(s) , nil
n1 + n2
if Je1 K(s) = n1 and Je2 K(s) = n2
(i, n + n ) if Je K(s) = (i, n ) and Je K(s) = n
1
2
1
1
2
2
Je1 + e2 K(s) ,
or Je1 K(s) = n1 and Je2 K(s) = (i, n2 )
nil
otherwise
if Je1 K(s) = n1 and Je2 K(s) = n2
n1 − n2
Je1 − e2 K(s) , (i, n1 − n2 ) if Je1 K(s) = (i, n1 ) and Je2 K(s) = n2
nil
otherwise
(
n1 × n2 if Je1 K(s) = n1 and Je2 K(s) = n2
Je1 × e2 K(s) ,
nil
otherwise
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Antal Spector-Zabusky, Greg Morrisett,
Justin Hsu, Michael Hicks, Yannis Juglaret, and Andrew
Tolmach for useful suggestions on earlier drafts. This work
is supported by NSF grants Micro-Policies (1513854) and
DeepSpec (1521523) and ERC Starting Grant SECOMP
(715753).
Je1 = e2 K(s) , (Je1 K(s) = Je2 K(s))
(
n1 ≤ n2 if Je1 K(s) = n1 and Je2 K(s) = n2
Je1 ≤ e2 K(s) ,
nil
otherwise
(
b1 ∧ b2 if Je1 K(s) = b1 and Je2 K(s) = b2
Je1 and e2 K(s) ,
nil
otherwise
(
b1 ∨ b2 if Je1 K(s) = b1 and Je2 K(s) = b2
Je1 or e2 K(s) ,
nil
otherwise
(
¬b if JeK(s) = b
Jnot eK(s) ,
nil otherwise
(
n if JeK(s) = (i, n)
Joffset eK(s) ,
nil otherwise
Appendix
This appendix defines the language of §2 more formally.
Figure 4 summarizes the syntax of programs and repeats
the definition of program states. The syntax is standard for
a simple imperative language with pointers.
Figure 5 defines expression evaluation, JeK : S → V .
Variables are looked up in the local-variable part of the
state (for simplicity, heap cells cannot be dereferenced in
expressions; the command x ← [e] puts the value of a heap
cell in a local variable). Constants (booleans, numbers, and
the special value nil used to simplify error propagation)
evaluate to themselves. Addition and subtraction can be
Figure 5. Expression evaluation
13
up in the heap, yielding an error if e does not evaluate to a
pointer or if it evaluates to a pointer that is invalid, either
because its block id is not allocated or because its offset
is out of bounds. Similarly, the heap mutation command,
[e1 ] ← e2 , requires that e1 evaluate to a pointer that is
valid in the current memory m (i.e., such that looking it
up in m yields something other than ⊥). The allocation
command x ← alloc(e) first evaluates e to an integer n,
then calculates the next free block id for the current machine
state (fresh(ids(l, m))); it yields a new machine state where
x points to the first cell in the new block and where a
new block of n cells is added the heap, all initialized to
0. Finally, free(e) evaluates e to a pointer and yields a new
heap where every cell sharing the same block id as this
pointer is undefined.
bind(f, ⊥) , ⊥
bind(f, error) , error
0 0
0
0 0
0
(I ∪ I , l , m ) if f (l, m) = (I , l , m )
bind(f, (I, l, m)) , error
if f (l, m) = error
⊥
otherwise
if b = true
x
if(b, x, y) , y
if b = false
error otherwise
Figure 6. Auxiliary operators bind and if
applied both to numbers and to combinations of numbers
and pointers (for pointer arithmetic); multiplication only
works on numbers. Equality is allowed both on pointers
and on numbers. Pointer equality compares both the block
identifier and its offset, and while this is harder to implement
in practice than just comparing physical addresses, this is
needed for not leaking information about pointers (see §4.2).
The special expression offset extracts the offset component
of a pointer; we introduce it to illustrate that for satisfying
our memory characterization pointer offsets do not need to
be hidden (as opposed to block identifiers). The less-thanor-equal operator only applies to numbers—in particular,
pointers cannot be compared. However, since we can extract
pointer offsets, we can compare those instead.
The definition of command evaluation employs an auxiliary partial function that computes the result of evaluating a
program along with the set of block identifiers that were
allocated during evaluation. Formally, JcK+ : S * O+ ,
where O+ is an extended set of outcomes defined as
Pfin (I) × S ] {error}. We then set
0
0
0
0
(l , m ) if JcK+ (l, m) = (I, l , m )
JcK(l, m) = error
if JcK+ (l, m) = error
⊥
if JcK+ (l, m) = ⊥
(
ids(l, m) \ I if JcK+ (l, m) = (I, l0 , m0 )
finalids(l, m) =
∅
otherwise
References
[1] Caja. attack vectors for privilege escalation, 2012.
[2] M. Abadi and G. D. Plotkin. On protection by layout randomization.
ACM TISSEC, 15(2):8, 2012.
[3] P. Agten, B. Jacobs, and F. Piessens. Sound modular verification of C
code executing in an unverified context. POPL. 2015.
[4] A. Ahmed, M. Fluet, and G. Morrisett. L3 : A linear language with
locations. Fundam. Inform., 77(4):397–449, 2007.
[5] A. Askarov, S. Hunt, A. Sabelfeld, and D. Sands. Terminationinsensitive noninterference leaks more than just a bit. ESORICS. 2008.
[6] A. Azevedo de Amorim, M. Dénès, N. Giannarakis, C. Hriţcu, B. C.
Pierce, A. Spector-Zabusky, and A. Tolmach. Micro-policies: Formally
verified, tag-based security monitors. Oakland S&P. 2015.
[7] M. Backes, B. Köpf, and A. Rybalchenko. Automatic discovery and
quantification of information leaks. Oakland S&P, 2009.
[8] T. Balabonski, F. Pottier, and J. Protzenko. Type soundness and race
freedom for Mezzo. FLOPS. 2014.
[9] N. Benton and N. Tabareau. Compiling functional types to relational
specifications for low level imperative code. In A. Kennedy and
A. Ahmed, editors, TLDI. 2009.
[10] K. Bhargavan, A. Delignat-Lavaud, and S. Maffeis. Defensive
javascript - building and verifying secure web components. In A. Aldini, J. Lopez, and F. Martinelli, editors, Foundations of Security
Analysis and Design VII - FOSAD 2012/2013 Tutorial Lectures. 2013.
[11] D. Chisnall, C. Rothwell, R. N. M. Watson, J. Woodruff, M. Vadera,
S. W. Moore, M. Roe, B. Davis, and P. G. Neumann. Beyond the
PDP-11: Architectural support for a memory-safe C abstract machine.
ASPLOS. 2015.
To define JcK+ , we first endow the set S * O+ with
the partial order of program approximation:
f vg
[12] J. A. Clause, I. Doudalis, A. Orso, and M. Prvulovic. Effective
memory protection using dynamic tainting. ASE. 2007.
, ∀s, f (s) 6= ⊥ ⇒ f (x) = g(x)
This allows us to define the semantics of iteration (the rule
for while e do c end) in a standard way using the Kleene
fixed point operator fix.
The definition of JcK+ appears in Figure 7, where several
of the rules use a bind operator (Figure 6) to manage the
“plumbing” of the sets of allocated block ids between the
evaluation of one subcommand and the next. The rules for
if and while also use an auxiliary operator if (also defined
in Figure 6) that turns non-boolean guards into errors.
The evaluation rules for skip, sequencing, conditionals, while, and assignment are standard. The rule for heap
lookup, x ← [e], evaluates e to a pointer and then looks it
[13] A. A. de Amorim, N. Collins, A. DeHon, D. Demange, C. Hritcu,
D. Pichardie, B. C. Pierce, R. Pollack, and A. Tolmach. A verified information-flow architecture. Journal of Computer Security,
24(6):689–734, 2016.
[14] J. Devietti, C. Blundell, M. M. K. Martin, and S. Zdancewic. HardBound: Architectural support for spatial safety of the C programming
language. ASPLOS, 2008.
[15] D. Devriese, F. Piessens, and L. Birkedal. Reasoning about object
capabilities with logical relations and effect parametricity. EuroS&P,
2016.
[16] U. Dhawan, C. Hriţcu, R. Rubin, N. Vasilakis, S. Chiricescu, J. M.
Smith, T. F. Knight, Jr., B. C. Pierce, and A. DeHon. Architectural
support for software-defined metadata processing. ASPLOS, 2015.
14
JskipK+ (l, m) , (∅, l, m)
Jc1 ; c2 K+ (l, m) , bind(Jc2 K+ , Jc1 K+ (l, m))
Jif e then c1 else c2 K+ (l, m) , if(JeK(l, m), Jc1 K+ (l, m), Jc2 K+ (l, m))
Jwhile e do c endK+ , fix(λ f (l, m). if(JeK(l, m), bind(JcK+ , f (l, m)), (∅, l, m)))
(
(∅, l[x 7→ v], m) if JeK(s) = (i, n) and m(i, n) = v
Jx ← eK+ (l, m) , (∅, l[x 7→ JeK(l, m)], m)
Jx ← [e]K+ (s) ,
error
otherwise
(
J[e1 ] ← e2 K+ (s) ,
(∅, l, m[(i, n) 7→ Je2 K(l, m)])
error
(
Jx ← alloc(e)K+ (l, m) ,
({i}, l[x 7→ (i, 0)], m[(i, k) 7→ 0 | 0 ≤ k < n])
error
(
Jfree(e)K+ (l, m) ,
if Je1 K(s) = (i, n) and m(i, n) 6= ⊥
otherwise
(∅, l, m[(i, k) 7→ ⊥ | k ∈ Z])
error
if JeK(l, m) = n and i = fresh(ids(l, m))
otherwise
if JeK(l, m) = (i, 0) and m(i, n) 6= ⊥ for some n
otherwise
Figure 7. Command evaluation with explicit allocation sets
[17] Z. Durumeric, J. Kasten, D. Adrian, J. A. Halderman, M. Bailey,
F. Li, N. Weaver, J. Amann, J. Beekman, M. Payer, and V. Paxson.
The matter of heartbleed. IMC. 2014.
[31] L. A. Meyerovich and V. B. Livshits. Conscript: Specifying and
enforcing fine-grained security policies for javascript in the browser.
Oakland S&P, 2010.
[18] T. Elliott, L. Pike, S. Winwood, P. C. Hickey, J. Bielman, J. Sharp,
E. L. Seidel, and J. Launchbury. Guilt free Ivory. Haskell. 2015.
[32] G. Morrisett, M. Felleisen, and R. Harper. Abstract models of memory
management. FPCA. 1995.
[19] C. Fournet, N. Swamy, J. Chen, P.-É. Dagand, P.-Y. Strub, and
B. Livshits. Fully abstract compilation to JavaScript. POPL. 2013.
[33] S. Nagarakatte, J. Zhao, M. M. K. Martin, and S. Zdancewic. SoftBound: highly compatible and complete spatial memory safety for C.
PLDI. 2009.
[20] J. A. Goguen and J. Meseguer. Security policies and security models.
In Symposium on Security and Privacy, 1982.
[34] S. Nagarakatte, J. Zhao, M. M. K. Martin, and S. Zdancewic. CETS:
compiler enforced temporal safety for C. ISMM. 2010.
[21] M. Hicks. What is memory safety? http://www.pl-enthusiast.net/
2014/07/21/memory-safety/, 2014.
[35] G. C. Necula, J. Condit, M. Harren, S. McPeak, and W. Weimer.
CCured: type-safe retrofitting of legacy software. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst., 27(3):477–526, 2005.
[22] ISO. ISO C standard 1999. Technical report, ISO, 1999. ISO/IEC
9899:1999 draft.
[36] A. M. Pitts. Nominal logic, a first order theory of names and binding.
Information and Computation, 186:2003, 2002.
[23] S. Jana and V. Shmatikov. Memento: Learning secrets from process
footprints. Oakland S&P. 2012.
[37] A. M. Pitts. Nominal Sets: Names and Symmetry in Computer
Science. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 2013.
[24] Y. Juglaret, C. Hritcu, A. Azevedo de Amorim, B. Eng, and B. C.
Pierce. Beyond good and evil: Formalizing the security guarantees of
compartmentalizing compilation. CSF, 2016.
[38] F. Pottier and J. Protzenko. Programming with permissions in Mezzo.
ICFP, 2013.
[25] J. Kang, C. Hur, W. Mansky, D. Garbuzov, S. Zdancewic, and
V. Vafeiadis. A formal C memory model supporting integer-pointer
casts. PLDI. 2015.
[39] J. C. Reynolds. Separation logic: A logic for shared mutable data
structures. LICS. 2002.
[40] The Rust programming language. http://www.rust-lang.org, 2017.
[26] R. Krebbers. The C standard formalized in Coq. PhD thesis, Radboud
University Nijmegen, 2015.
[41] C. Schlesinger, K. Pattabiraman, N. Swamy, D. Walker, and B. G.
Zorn. Modular protections against non-control data attacks. Journal
of Computer Security, 22(5):699–742, 2014.
[27] A. Kwon, U. Dhawan, J. M. Smith, T. F. Knight, Jr., and A. DeHon.
Low-fat pointers: compact encoding and efficient gate-level implementation of fat pointers for spatial safety and capability-based security.
CCS. 2013.
[42] G. Smith. On the foundations of quantitative information flow.
FoSSaCS. 2009.
[28] X. Leroy and S. Blazy. Formal verification of a C-like memory model
and its uses for verifying program transformations. JAR, 41(1):1–31,
2008.
[43] D. Stefan, P. Buiras, E. Z. Yang, A. Levy, D. Terei, A. Russo, and
D. Mazières. Eliminating cache-based timing attacks with instructionbased scheduling. ESORICS. 2013.
[29] S. Maffeis, J. C. Mitchell, and A. Taly. Object capabilities and
isolation of untrusted web applications. Oakland S&P, 2010.
[44] N. Swamy, M. W. Hicks, G. Morrisett, D. Grossman, and T. Jim.
Safe manual memory management in Cyclone. Science of Computer
Programming, 62(2):122–144, 2006.
[30] K. Memarian, J. Matthiesen, J. Lingard, K. Nienhuis, D. Chisnall,
R. N. M. Watson, and P. Sewell. Into the depths of C: elaborating the
de facto standards. PLDI. 2016.
[45] D. Swasey, D. Garg, and D. Dreyer. Robust and compositional
verification of object capability patterns. To appear at OOPSLA, 2017.
15
[46] L. Szekeres, M. Payer, T. Wei, and D. Song. SoK: Eternal war in
memory. IEEE S&P. 2013.
[47] A. Taly, Ú. Erlingsson, J. C. Mitchell, M. S. Miller, and J. Nagra.
Automated analysis of security-critical javascript apis. Oakland S&P.
2011.
[48] A. Turon. Rust: from POPL to practice (keynote). POPL. 2017.
[49] C. Williams. Oracle’s Larry Ellison claims his Sparc M7 chip is
hacker-proof – errr... The Register, 2015.
[50] E. Z. Yang and D. Mazières. Dynamic space limits for Haskell. PLDI.
2014.
[51] H. Yang and P. W. O’Hearn. A semantic basis for local reasoning.
FoSSaCS. 2002.
[52] D. Zhang, A. Askarov, and A. C. Myers. Language-based control
and mitigation of timing channels. PLDI. 2012.
16
| 6cs.PL
|
On the Foundation of NOMA and its Application to
5G Cellular Networks
Hikmet Sari1, 4 , Ali Maatouk2 , Ersoy Caliskan3 , Mohamad Assaad2 , Mutlu Koca3 , and Guan Gui1
1
NUPT, 66 Xinmofan Road, Gulou District, Nanjing, 210003 China
CentraleSupélec, Plateau de Moulon, 91192 Gif sur Yvette, France
3
Bogazici University, Electrical & Electronics Eng. Dept., Bebek 34342 Istanbul, Turkey
4
Sequans Communications, 15 – 55 Boulevard Charles de Gaulle, 92700 Colombes, France
arXiv:1710.03046v2 [cs.IT] 11 Oct 2017
2
Abstract—Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access (NOMA) is recognized today as a most promising technology for future 5G cellular
networks and a large number of papers have been published
on the subject over the past few years. Interestingly, none of
these authors seems to be aware that the foundation of NOMA
actually dates back to the year 2000, when a series of papers
introduced and investigated multiple access schemes using two
sets of orthogonal signal waveforms and iterative interference
cancellation at the receiver. The purpose of this paper is to
shed light on that early literature and to describe a practical
scheme based on that concept, which is particularly attractive
for Machine-Type Communications (MTC) in future 5G cellular
networks. Using this approach, NOMA appears as a convenient
extension of orthogonal multiple access rather than a strictly
competing technology, and most important of all, the power
imbalance between the transmitted user signals that is required to
make the receiver work in other NOMA schemes is not required
here.
I. INTRODUCTION
Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access (NOMA) is currently a
hot research topic for the physical layer of future 5G cellular
networks, and more particularly for Machine-Type Communications (MTC) in that context. The interest in this multiple
access technique originated from a well-established result
in multi-user information theory, which says that orthogonal
multiple access is not optimal in general and that superposition
coding coupled with successive interference cancellation (SIC)
provides an optimal solution for multiple access [1], [2].
Historically, time-division multiple access (TDMA) and
frequency-division multiple access (FDMA) have been known
and used in various forms for quite a long time. Focusing on
digital cellular networks, the two major standards in secondgeneration (2G) cellular networks were the Global Standard
for Mobile Communications (GSM) and IS-95. The first one
of these was based on TDMA, and the second was based on
code-division multiple access (CDMA) [3]. For 3G networks,
the winner was the CDMA technology, and the so-called
Wideband CDMA (WCDMA) became the standard [4]. All
of these networks were based on single-carrier transmission.
Finally, 4G networks were based on the multicarrier transmission technology known as orthogonal frequency-division
multiplexing (OFDM), previously used for terrestrial digital
video broadcasting (DVB-T), WiFi, and WiMAX. In terms of
multiple access, WiFi continued to use TDMA, but WiMAX
used orthogonal frequency-division multiple access (OFDMA)
which uses the frequency dimension of OFDM for resource
allocation [5]. As for the 3GPP Long-Term Evolution (LTE)
and LTE-Advanced standards [6] and [7], they used OFDMA
on the downlink and single-carrier FDMA (SC-FDMA) on
the uplink in order to reduce the peak-to-average power ratio
(PAPR) of the transmitted signal.
All of these multiple access techniques are orthogonal
and ensure that no interference exists between users in ideal
conditions. In TDMA only one user is active at a time, and
in conventional FDMA only one user is active at a given
frequency. In CDMA orthogonality is ensured by the properties of the Walsh-Hadamard (WH) sequences used for signal
spreading. Finally, although individual user signals overlap in
frequency in the case of OFDMA, orthogonality is achieved
thanks to the carrier spacing of 1/T, where T is the symbol
period. Of course, in all of these techniques, orthogonality on
the uplink requires perfect synchronization between different
user signals.
Until the development of multi-user information theory,
orthogonality of different user signals was always perceived as
a most desirable property. But analysis of the channel capacity
which indicated that orthogonal multiple access is not always
optimal opened up new perspectives and research directions
for future networks. Recently, a large number of papers have
been published on non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA),
which is perceived as a most promising technology for 5G
cellular networks (See, e.g., [8]–[11]). The analysis in these
papers promise substantial gains compared to conventional
orthogonal multiple access. The purpose of the present paper
is to put into context the current work on NOMA, quantify its
potential, and point out previous work on the subject [12]–[15],
which seems to be unnoticed by current researchers. Using
that approach, NOMA appears as a convenient extension of
orthogonal multiple access rather than a strictly competing
technology.
The paper is organized as follows: In the next section, we
recall the basic principle of NOMA and we quantify the gain
that this technique can achieve with respect to orthogonal
multiple access in different scenarios. In Section III, we
review the earlier work on NOMA that is based on the joint
use of two orthogonal multiple access schemes. Using this
concept, we describe in Section IV a practical NOMA scheme
which elegantly combines OFDMA and Multi-Carrier CDMA
(MC-CDMA) and turns out to be particularly suitable for
accommodating two user groups with different profiles in
terms of data rate requirements. Finally, we give simulation
results in Section V and our conclusions in Section VI.
II. PRINCIPLE OF NOMA
To describe the basic principle of NOMA, we will focus
here on a two-user uplink channel in a cellular network. We
will assume that user 1 has a strong signal power P1 and
user 2 has a weaker signal power P2 . In these conditions,
the receiver can detect the user-1 signal in the presence of
interference from the user-2 signal, and then it can subtract the
detected user-1 signal from the received signal to detect the
weaker user-2 signal without interference. Assuming that the
channel is an additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channel
of normalized bandwidth W = 1 Hz, the user 1 capacity in
bits per Hertz is given by
P1
(1)
R1 = log2 1 +
P2 + N 0
where N0 is the noise spectral density (the noise power in
the unit bandwidth W = 1 Hz). After detecting the signal
transmitted by user 1, the receiver can subtract this from the
received signal and detect the user 2 signal in the absence of
interference. The user 2 capacity is given by
P2
R2 = log2 1 +
(2)
N0
and consequently, the total capacity for the two users is
expressed as
P1
P2
R = R1 + R2 = log2 1 +
+ log2 1 +
. (3)
P2 + N0
N0
A simple manipulation of this equation shows that
P1
P2
P
R = log2 (1 +
)(1 +
) = log2 1 +
(4)
P2 + N 0
N0
N0
where P = P1 + P2 is the total power. This indicates that
the capacity of the multi-user channel is identical to that of a
single-user channel with the same total power.
The situation is actually not different for orthogonal waveform multiple access (OWMA). Without any loss of generality,
consider an OFDMA scheme with 2 users. Again, P1 will
designate here the power of the user-1 signal, P2 will designate
the power of the user-2 signal, and P = P1 + P2 is the
total power. We write P1 = αP and P2 = (1 − α)P , with
0 ≤ α ≤ 1. The signal power being uniformly distributed over
the N carriers composing the OFDMA signal, the bandwidth
allocation to the two users follows the same proportions as
the signal power. In other words, we have W1 = αW and
W2 = (1 − α)W , where bandwidth W1 is allocated to user 1
and W2 is allocated to user 2. The capacity equations for the
two users are given by
P
P1
= αlog2 1 +
(5)
R1 = αlog2 1 +
W1 N0
N0
and
R2 = (1 − α)log2 1 +
P2
P
= (1 − α)log2 1 +
(6)
W 2 N0
N0
respectively. The total capacity R = R1 + R2 is therefore
identical to the NOMA capacity given by equation (4). In
summary, when the user signals do not have relative attenuations, both OWMA and NOMA achieve the single-user
channel capacity, and the two multiple access technique do
not have any difference in terms of capacity.
The difference between the two multiple access techniques
appears when one of the user signals is subject to a different
attenuation than the other signal. Suppose that user 2 signal is
attenuated by 6 dB while the user 1 signal has no attenuation.
In that case, the OFDMA capacity becomes
P/4
P
+ (1 − α)log2 1 +
(7)
N0
N0
and the NOMA capacity will be
αP
RN OM A = log2 1 +
(1 − α)P/4 + N0
(8)
(1 + 3α)P
(1 − α)P/4
= log2 1 +
.
+ log2 1 +
N0
4N0
To compare these two capacities, assume now that α = 0.8
and P/N0 = 15 so that the single-user channel capacity is 4
bits per Hertz. In that case, (7) will read ROF DM A = 3.65 and
(8) will read RN OM A = 3.78. Comparing these numbers, we
can see that NOMA increases the two-user channel capacity
by 3.5% in this particular case. Pursuing the comparison
further, it turns out that the advantage of NOMA increases
when the parameter α is reduced and when the attenuation
of the user-2 signal is further increased. But the capacity
increase offered by NOMA does not come completely for free.
Since user signals interfere with each other, iterative detection
with interference cancellation is needed. When one signal is
significantly weaker than the other, the strong signal can be
detected with a small penalty and then subtracted from the
received signal to detect the weak signal. Next, the weak
signal is subtracted from the received signal to make more
reliable second iteration decisions on the symbols of the strong
signal, and so forth, until performance gets close to that of
interference-free transmission. This process works fine when
there is a strong imbalance between the two user signals, but
it will have convergence problems when the two signals have
similar powers.
ROF DM A = αlog2 1 +
III. EARLY LITERATURE
The interest in NOMA today is closely related to the
emergence of research projects on 5G cellular networks. The
main research topics for the definition of the physical layer of
5G networks have been Massive MIMO, Waveform Design,
and Millimeter-Wave Technologies, and multiple access is a
key component of waveform design. Most papers on NOMA
have been published over the past few years, and interestingly,
the authors seem to be completely unaware of a series of
papers which laid the foundation of NOMA over 15 years
ago. This early literature did not use the word NOMA, but
the principle of NOMA and all of the ingredients which
characterize this technique were disclosed back in the year
2000. Below is a short summary of this work whose basic
principle is to use two sets of orthogonal signal waveforms.
We describe it here focusing on the combination of TDMA
and OCDMA as in [12], where the TDMA signal set is used
in full and OCDMA signal set is used in part.
Consider a simple TDMA system with N users in which
each user gets one data symbol per frame of N symbols. The
multiple access channel has a bandwidth of N W Hz, where
W is the bandwidth which would be required to transmit the
signal of the individual users if they transmitted alone. This
scheme thus accommodates N users without any interference.
To accommodate additional users (say M users, where M <
N ), a second signal set is used. The second signal set too is an
orthogonal set, but the two sets are not mutually orthogonal.
Specifically, the second set used here is the OCDMA signal
set formed of length-N Walsh-Hadamard (WH) sequences. In
the resulting multiple access scheme with N + M users, the
first N users do not interfere with each other, and the same
applies to the second set of M users, but each user from the
first set interferes with every user from the second set, and vice
versa. That is, we have here a NOMA scheme with interference
between two groups of users, and iterative detection with serial
interference cancellation is needed to detect the transmitted
symbols.
The basic principle is schetched in Fig.1, which shows how
M OCDMA symbols are stacked to a block of N TDMA
symbols. On the abscissa of this figure, TC designates the
OCDMA chip duration as well as the TDMA symbol duration,
and T = N · TC is the OCDMA symbol duration, which is
also the duration of the TDMA symbol block. The transmitted
instantaneous power is P for each OCDMA symbol and N ·P
for each TDMA symbol so that both TDMA and OCDMA
symbols have an energy of E = N ·P ·TC = P ·T . The TDMA
signal set here is used in full, while the OCDMA signal set is
used only partially. This picture clearly shows that preliminary
decisions can be made on the TDMA symbols as long as M
remains small compared to N .
Let us write down the equations describing the transmitted
signal. The time index describing the symbol position in a
TDMA block is denoted n. Symbol an with 1 ≤ n ≤ N
is assigned to TDMA user #n. The symbols assigned to the
OCDMA users are denoted bm with 1 ≤ m ≤ M . We also
write the WH sequences used for signal spreading as Wm =
(wm,1 , wm,2 , . . . .., wm,N ) for m = 1, 2, . . . ., M . Using this
notation, the transmitted signal can be written as
M
1 X
wm,n bm
(9)
xn = an + √
N m=1
√
for n = 1, 2, . . . , N . The division by N in (9) is to preserve
the symbol energy during the symbol spreading process. The
received signal can be written as rn = xn + un with un
being the additive noise for n = 1, 2, . . . , N . Provided that the
Fig. 1: An illustration of the combined TDMA/OCDMA
scheme, where the TDMA signal set is used in full and the
OCDMA signal set is used partially.
number of OCDMA users M is not too large, the interference
term in (9) remains small compared to the TDMA symbol
power, and the received signal sample rn can be sent to a
threshold detector to make a decision on the transmitted an
symbol. Once these first-iteration decisions are made on all
an symbols, the estimated symbol values are subtracted from
the received signal samples according to yn = rn − ân , where
for each n, ân stands for the decision made on symbol an .
Referring back to (9), we can write yn as
M
1 X
wm,n bm + un .
yn = an − ân + √
N m=1
(10)
Assuming ân = an , (10) simplifies to
M
1 X
yn = √
wm,n bm + un .
N m=1
(11)
The next operation in the receiver is to perform signal despreading and make decisions on the OCDMA symbols. Signal
despreading consists of
N
1 X
zk = √
wk,n yn
N n=1
N
M
1 X
1 X
=√
wk,n √
wm,n bm + un
N n=1
N m=1
(12)
N
1 X
= bk + √
wk,n un .
N n=1
The second term is a noise term with identical variance to
that of the original noise. The first iteration decisions on the
OCDMA symbols are made by passing the zk ’s to a threshold
detector.
Once the first-iteration decisions are also made for the
{bm , m = 1, 2, . . . , M } symbols, their interference can be
cancelled to make second-iteration decisions on the {an , n =
1, 2, . . . , N } symbols. The process is as follows: For each n,
compute vn = rn −
√1
N
PM
m=1
wm,n b̂m , where for each m,
b̂m is the decision on bm . Assuming that b̂m = bm for all m
and using (9), we get vn = an +un . This signal is next sent to
a threshold detector to make a decision on an in the absence
of interference. The second-iteration decisions are obviously
more reliable than the first-iteration decisions, and the process
continues as in the first iteration to make second-iteration
decisions on the {bm , m = 1, 2, . . . , M } symbols. Additional
iterations can further improve performance in some cases, but
the results show that two iterations are sufficient when M is
small.
The concept described above is not just applicable to multiple access. It is equally applicable to single-user transmission,
and therefore the terminology of “channel overloading” was
used in [14] to describe it. The basic idea is that once the
channel is fully loaded using an orthogonal signaling scheme
(orthogonal transmission for a single-user channel or orthogonal multiple access for a multiuser channel), it is overloaded
through the superposition of a second signal to the first one.
Optimum joint detection being too complex to implement,
the receiver in practice takes the form of an iterative receiver
with interference cancellation. For multiple access, the recent
NOMA literature focuses on the superposition of two user
signals, but the concept reviewed in this section goes actually
further and superposes the signals of two user groups.
IV. NOMA FOR 5G
Since OFDMA has been the basic multiple access scheme
used in 4G cellular systems and it has also been adopted by
the 3GPP for mobile broadband (eMBB) services in 5G [16],
we will now describe a frequency-domain NOMA scheme,
which consists of using OFDMA for the first group of users
and Multi-Carrier CDMA (MC-CDMA) for the second group.
The principle is exactly the same as the one described in the
previous section, with the frequency dimension substituted
for the time dimension as shown in Fig. 2. In this figure,
1/N T is the carrier spacing, the OFDMA symbols have a
power spectrum density (PSD) of N · D Watt/Hz, and the
MC-CDMA symbols that are superposed to them have a PSD
of D Watt/Hz.
To describe this NOMA technique further, consider an
OFDMA system with N carriers and without any loss of
generality assume that each carrier is assigned to a separate
user. Such a system accommodates N users providing one
QAM symbol to each of them during every OFDM symbol.
Applying the concept described in Section III, we superpose
to this OFDMA signal a set of MC-CDMA signals carrying
information for a second group of users. The mathematical
equations of Section III remain the same except that here, n
with 1 ≤ n ≤ N designates the carrier index, and xn given
by (9) designates the signal transmitted on the nth carrier. A
simple block diagram of the transmitter is shown in Fig. 3.
The output of the OFDMA Users block is an N-dimensional
QAM symbol vector {an , n = 1, 2, . . . , N } and the MCCDMA Users block is an M-dimensional symbol vector
{bm , m = 1, 2, . . . , M }. The Walsh-Hadamard Spreading box
Fig. 2: An illustration of the combined OFDMA/MC-CDMA
scheme, where the OFDMA signal set is used in full and the
MC-CDMA signal set is used partially.
Fig. 3: Transmitter block diagram of a NOMA scheme using
OFDMA for the first set of users and MC-CDMA for the
second set of users.
spreads the MC-CDMA symbols over the N carriers and
outputs an N-dimensional vector that is summed with the
OFDMA symbols vector. The resulting signal block is passed
to an N-point inverse DFT operator followed by the insertion
of cyclic prefix (CP) between consecutive inverse DFT blocks.
The corresponding receiver is sketched in Fig. 4.
Fig. 4: Receiver block diagram for the NOMA scheme of Fig.
3.
After CP removal in the time domain, the signal is converted
to the frequency domain by means of an N-point DFT. The
output of this operator {rn , n = 1, 2, . . . , N } is directly passed
to a threshold detector to make first-iteration decisions on the
OFDMA symbols. These are denoted {ân , n = 1, 2, . . . , N }.
These decisions are subtracted from the DFT operator output
to provide {yn = rn − ân , n = 1, 2, ..., N } and this signal
is passed to a Walsh-Hadamard despreader. The despreader
output is next sent to a threshold detector to make first-iteration
decisions on the MC-CDMA symbols {bm , m = 1, 2, . . . , M }.
These decisions, which are denoted {b̂m , m = 1, 2, . . . , M },
are Walsh-Hadamard spread, the spreader output block is
subtracted from {rn , n = 1, 2, . . . , N }, and the resulting
signal is passed to a threshold detector to make seconditeration decisions on {an , n = 1, 2, . . . , N }. Finally, these
decisions are subtracted from the threshold detector inputs,
the resulting signal is Walsh-Hadamard despread and passed
to a threshold detector to make second-iteration decisions on
{bm , m = 1, 2, . . . , M }. The process can continue to make
further iterations as required, but two iterations are sufficient
in practice for small values of M .
At this point, it is important to discuss the number of MCCDMA user signals which can be superposed to the OFDMA
user signals without a significant performance degradation.
The WH sequences used for signal spreading are binary
sequences
with components ±1. Due to the multiplicative term
√
each
1/ N used in signal spreading, the interference from √
MC-CDMA user on OFDMA users is of the form
±1/
N.
√
When the number of MC-CDMA users reaches N , the peak
interference amplitude reaches 1 and the eye diagram of the
OFDMA signal becomes closed. In this case, errors occur
in the first-iteration decisions of OFDMA symbols even in
the absence of noise, which means that the corresponding bit
error rate (BER) curve features an error floor. Correspondingly,
we
√ limit for the moment the number of MC-CDMA users to
N , although this does not represent a strict bound. Indeed,
an iterative receiver employing soft decisions instead of hard
decisions as described in [15] will help accommodating a
higher number of MC-CDMA users.
that is close to 1 dB at BER values lower than 10−4 . At the
second iteration, performance improves sharply and the BER
curve virtually coincides with the theoretical BER curve of
QPSK at BER values below 10−5 . These results indicate that
in the case at hand no more than 2 iterations are needed in the
iterative receiver to cancel the interference between OFDMA
users and MC-CDMA users.
Fig. 5: Bit error rate for OFDMA users for N = 64 and
M = 4.
V. SIMULATION RESULTS
Performance of the NOMA scheme presented in the previous section was evaluated using computer simulations. The
simulations were carried out over an additive white Gaussian
noise (AWGN) channel using an OFDMA/MC-CDMA scheme
with N = 64 carriers, 16-QAM modulation for the OFDMA
users, and QPSK for the MC-CDMA users. In a first set of
simulations, the number of MC-CDMA users was M = 4
and in a second set M was increased to 8 such that the
superposition of the MC-CDMA signals to the OFDMA signal
leads to a closed eye diagram.
With M = 4, the performance results are given in Fig. 5
for OFDMA users and in Fig. 6 for MC-CDMA users. As
can be seen in Fig. 5, the BER curve of OFDMA users at the
first iteration has a large gap from the theoretical BER curve
of 16-QAM, but the second iteration gives a remarkable result
and leads essentially to the same performance as the theoretical
curve for BER values below 10−3 . The gap at the first iteration
can be explained by the level of interference from MC-CDMA
users. Next, examining Fig. 6, we can see that performance
of the MC-CDMA users has somewhat a different behavior.
The performance curve at the first iteration has essentially the
same shape as the theoretical BER curve of QPSK with a gap
Fig. 6: Bit error rate for MC-CDMA users for N = 64 and
M = 4.
The results corresponding to M = 8 are given in Fig. 7
for OFDMA users and in Fig. 8 for OCDMA users. Three
iterations were made in this case. Fig. 7 shows that at the first
iteration, the BER curve decays only very slowly and reaches
5.10−3 at Eb /N0 of 14 dB. The second iteration reduces the
bit error rate to some extent, but a BER floor slightly below
10−3 is clearly visible on that curve. A third iteration gave
only a marginal improvement and did not change the value of
the BER floor. Next, Fig. 8 shows that the BER curve is very
flat at the first iteration and that the second iteration provides
a very small improvement. The third iteration provided no
improvement at all and the BER floor is slightly higher than
10−2 on this figure. This result confirms that when hard
decisions are made in the iterative receiver,
the number of
√
MC-CDMA users must be kept below N in order to avoid
the appearance of a BER floor.
and OCDMA for the second set. Next, focusing on the context
of 5G cellular systems, we described a practical NOMA
scheme employing a combination of OFDMA and MCCDMA, which can form an attractive solution for machinetype communications in 5G. In that approach, NOMA can
be viewed as an extension of OFDMA to perform channel
overloading and accommodate a higher number of users when
all resources of OFDMA are used. Alternatively, OFDMA
and MC-CDMA can be used to accommodate two user sets
with different profiles and data rate requirements. The power
imbalance which is required to make reliable detection in
NOMA appears very naturally in this approach, because for
identical symbol energy, the power spectrum density of MCCDMA symbols is only (1/N )th of the OFDMA spectrum
density.
R EFERENCES
Fig. 7: Bit error rate for OFDMA users for N = 64 and
M = 8.
Fig. 8: Bit error rate for MC-CDMA users for N = 64 and
M = 8.
VI. CONCLUSIONS
In this paper, we have addressed NOMA, which is a strong
candidate today for machine-type communications in future
5G cellular systems. After describing the basic principle of
this technique, we pointed out that its foundation actually goes
back to the year 2000, a fact that seems to be unnoticed by
authors of recent papers. The concept appeared in a series
of papers published in that period describing multiple access
using two orthogonal signal sets and iterative detection with
serial interference cancellation. We first gave a comprehensive
review of this technique using TDMA for the first set of users
[1] D. Tse and P. Viswanath, Fundamentals of Wireless Communication.
Cambridge University Press, 2005.
[2] A. Goldsmith, Wireless Communications. Cambridge University Press,
2005.
[3] A. J. Viterbi, CDMA: Principles of Spread Spectrum Communication.
Addison Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., 1995.
[4] H. Holma and A. Toskala, WCDMA for UMTS: HSPA Evolution and
LTE. John Wiley & Sons, 2007.
[5] “IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks – Part
16: Air Interface for Fixed and Mobile Broadband Wireless Access
Systems,” IEEE 802.16-2005, February 2006.
[6] 3rd Generation Partnership Project Technical Specification Group Radio
Access Network, “Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (EUTRA); User Equipment (UE) Radio Transmission and Reception,”
3GPP, Tech. Rep. (Release 8), TS 36.101 v8.7.0, September 2009.
[7] H. Holma and A. Toskala, LTE for UMTS: Evolution to LTE-Advanced.
John Wiley & Sons, 2011.
[8] Y. Saito, Y. Kishiyama, A. Benjebbour, T. Nakamura, A. Li, and
K. Higuchi, “Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access (NOMA) for Cellular
Future Radio Access,” in 2013 IEEE 77th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring), June 2013, pp. 1–5.
[9] Z. Ding, Z. Yang, P. Fan, and H. V. Poor, “On the Performance of NonOrthogonal Multiple Access in 5G Systems with Randomly Deployed
Users,” IEEE Signal Processing Letters, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 1501–1505,
Dec 2014.
[10] L. Dai, B. Wang, Y. Yuan, S. Han, C. l. I, and Z. Wang, “Non-Orthogonal
Multiple Access for 5G: Solutions, Challenges, Opportunities, and
Future Research Trends,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 53,
no. 9, pp. 74–81, September 2015.
[11] Z. Ding, Y. Liu, J. Choi, Q. Sun, M. Elkashlan, C. L. I, and H. V.
Poor, “Application of Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access in LTE and 5G
Networks,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 185–
191, February 2017.
[12] H. Sari, F. Vanhaverbeke, and M. Moeneclaey, “Multiple Access Using
Two Sets of Orthogonal Signal Waveforms,” IEEE Communications
Letters, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 4–6, January 2000.
[13] ——, “Extending the Capacity of Multiple Access Channels,” IEEE
Communications Magazine, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 74–82, January 2000.
[14] ——, “Channel Overloading in Multiuser and Single-User Communications,” in 11th IEEE International Symposium on Personal Indoor
and Mobile Radio Communications. PIMRC 2000. Proceedings (Cat.
No.00TH8525), vol. 2, 2000, pp. 1106–1111 vol.2.
[15] F. Vanhaverbeke, M. Moeneclaey, and H. Sari, “Turbo Multiple Access:
Channel Overloading Using Two Sets of Orthogonal Signal Waveforms
and Iterative Interference Cancellation.” in Proceedings 2nd International Symposium on Turbo Codes and Related Topics, Brest, Sept. 4-7
2000, September 2000, pp. 181–184.
[16] 3rd Generation Partnership Project, “Study on New Radio Access
Technology Physical Layer Aspects,” 3GPP, Tech. Rep. TR 38.802
v14.0.0, March 2017.
| 7cs.IT
|
arXiv: arXiv:0000.0000
Permutation p-value approximation via
generalized Stolarsky invariance
arXiv:1603.02757v2 [math.ST] 9 Aug 2017
Hera Y. He, Kinjal Basu, Qingyuan Zhao, Art B. Owen
Department of Statistics
Sequoia Hall
Stanford University
Stanford, CA 94305
e-mail: (yhe1, kinjal, qyzhao, owen)@stanford.edu
Abstract: It is common for genomic data analysis to use p-values from a
large number of permutation tests. The multiplicity of tests may require
very tiny p-values in order to reject any null hypotheses and the common practice of using randomly sampled permutations then becomes very
expensive. We propose an inexpensive approximation to p-values for two
sample linear test statistics, derived from Stolarsky’s invariance principle.
The method creates a geometrically derived set of approximate p-values
for each hypothesis. The average of that set is used as a point estimate p̂
and our generalization of the invariance principle allows us to compute the
variance of the p-values in that set. We find that in cases where the point
estimate is small the variance is a modest multiple of the square of the point
estimate, yielding a relative error property similar to that of saddlepoint
approximations. On a Parkinson’s disease data set, the new approximation
is faster and more accurate than the saddlepoint approximation. We also
obtain a simple probabilistic explanation of Stolarsky’s invariance principle.
1. Introduction
Permutation methods are commonly used to obtain p-values in genomic applications. They make only modest assumptions and they have a direct intuitive
interpretation that appeals to biologists in collaborations. In even modestly
large data sets, the exact permutation p-value becomes too expensive to compute. Then Monte Carlo sampling of random permutations becomes a standard
approach. Genomic applications commonly require thousands or more of hypotheses to be tested, and then multiplicity adjustment requires that some small
p-values be obtained if any null hypotheses are to be rejected. When p-values
below are required to reject H0 , then Knijnenburg et al. (2009) recommend
doing at least 10/ random permutations. As a result, even Monte Carlo sampling for permutation tests can be prohibitively expensive, and hence it pays to
search for fast approximations to the permutation p-value.
In this paper we develop rapidly computable approximations to some permutation p-values. The p-values we consider are for a difference in group means.
The approximations are based on ideas from spherical geometry and discrepancy,
related to the Stolarsky invariance principle (Stolarsky, 1973). As described below, the resulting approximations prove to be very accurate for the tiny p-values
where permutation methods are most difficult to use.
1
He, Basu, Zhao & Owen/Stolarsky invariance for permutations
2
We begin with some background on the genomic motivation of our work.
Then we transition to spherical geometry.
Genomic context
The specific problem that motivated us is testing for sets of genes associated
with Parkinson’s disease (Larson and Owen, 2015). More details about this work
are given in the the first author’s dissertation (He, 2016).
In these data sets, there are m0 subjects without Parkinson’s disease and m1
subjects with it. One can test whether Parkinson’s disease is associated with
an individual gene by doing a t-test comparing gene expression levels in tissue
samples from the two groups of subjects. Biological interest is often summarized
more by gene sets rather than individual genes. Gene sets have two advantages:
small but consistent associations of many genes with the test condition can
raise power, and, the gene sets themselves often connect better to biological
understanding than do individual genes. The null hypothesis is that the subject
condition does not affect expression levels of any gene in the gene set.
There is a very large literature on testing for significant associations between
a condition and the genes in a gene set. See Ackermann and Strimmer (2009)
for an overview of the main concepts and methods in that literature. They did
an extensive comparison of 261 different gene set testing methods and identified
two families of winning methods. Let tg be the ordinary two sample t statistic
for comparing the average expression level of gene g between two conditions and
let G be a set ofPgenes of interest. They
P found that linear and quadratic test
statistics LG = g∈G tg and QG = g∈G t2g had the best power, along with
some simple approximations to those two statistics. These methods performed
better than some subtantially more complicated proposals. The statistic LG was
proposed by Jiang and Gentleman (2007). The statistic LG and similar ones did
best when expression differences between the two conditions tend to have the
same sign, for each g ∈ G. If large but oppositely signed treatment effects occur,
then QG and approximations to it do best.
The genes in a gene set are ordinarily correlated with each other, even if
they are independent of the treatment condition. The correlations makes it
difficult to find the null distributions of LG and QG , even with parametric model
assumptions. In a permutation
analysis, like Ackermann and Strimmer (2009)
use, we consider all N = mn1 different ways to select a subset π containing m1
of the n = m0 + m1 subjects. Let QπG be the test statistic recomputed as if those
m1 subjects had been the affected group. Then the permutation p-value for QG
is
1 X
1QπG >QG .
p = pG =
N π
Note that the smallest possible value for p is 1/N .
When N is too large for a permutation test to be computationally feasible,
a standard practice is to estimate p via randomly sampled permutations of the
treatment label as proposed by Barnard (1963). For ` = 1, . . . , M − 1 we let
He, Basu, Zhao & Owen/Stolarsky invariance for permutations
3
π(`) be the affected group after a randomization of the treatment labels. We let
π(0) be the original allocation. Then the Monte Carlo estimate
p̂ =
M −1
1 X
1Qπ(`) >QG
G
M
`=0
is used as an estimate of p, for the quadratic statistic. In this Monte Carlo,
the true permutation p-value p is the unknown parameter and p̂ is the sample
estimate of p. Note that p̂ > 1/M because we have included the original allocation in the numerator. Failure to include the original allocation π(0) can lead
to p̂ = 0 which is very undesirable. We call 1/M the granularity limit. When
p is quite small, an enormous number M of simulations may be required to
get an accurate estimate of it. For instance, in genome wide association studies (GWAS) the customary threshold for significance is = 5 × 10−8 , making
permutation methods prohibitively expensive, or even infeasible. For a recent
discussion of p-value thresholds in GWAS, see Fadista et al. (2016).
In this paper, we work with one of Ackermann and Strimmer’s (2009) approximations to LG . Let Xi = 1 if subject i is in condition 1 and Xi = 0 for
condition 0. Let Yig be the expression level of gene g for subjectq
i. Let ρ̂g be
√
the sample correlation between Xi and Yig . Then tg = n − 2ρ̂g / 1 − ρ̂2g and
. √
a first order Taylor approximation gives tg = n − 2(ρ̂g + ρ̂3g /2). When many
small correlations ρ̂g contribute to the signal, then summing ρ̂g gives a test
statistic that is almost equivalent to summing tg . Ackermann and Strimmer
(2009) found that
n
X 1X
Xi − X̄ Ygi − Ȳg
n i=1 sX
sg
(1.1)
g∈G
was in the same winning set of methods as LG , where sX and sg are standard deviations of Xi and Ygi respectively. They also considered using pooled
variance estimates in place of sg but found no advantage to doing so, perhaps
because
min(m0 , m1 ) was at least 10 in their simulations. Letting Yi = YGi ≡
P
g∈G Ygi /sg , we may rewrite (1.1) as
n
X
i=1
Yi − Ȳ
Xi − X̄
kX − 1n X̄k kY − 1n Ȳ k
(1.2)
multiplied by a constant that only depends on n and hence does not affect p.
Equation (1.2) describes a test statistic that is a plain Euclidean inner product
of two unit vectors in Rn . Here x0 has i’th component (Xi − X̄)/kX − 1n X̄k
and y 0 is similar.
There are N = mn1 distinct vectors found by permuting the entries in x. We
label them x0 , x1 , . . . , xN −1 with x0 being the original one. Letting ρ̂ = xT
0 y0
we find that one and two-sided p-values for a linear statistic are
N −1
1 X
1xTk y0 >ρ̂
N
k=0
and
N −1
1 X
1|xTk y0 |>|ρ̂|
N
k=0
He, Basu, Zhao & Owen/Stolarsky invariance for permutations
4
repectively. We prefer two-sided test statistics, but we will study one-sided ones
first and then translate our results to two-sided ones.
Spherical geometry
We are now ready to make a geometric interpretation. Let Sd = {z ∈ Rd+1 |
z T z = 1} be the d-dimensional unit sphere. Our data x0 , y 0 are in a subset
of Sn−1 orthogonal to 1n . That subset is isomorphic to Sn−2 and so we work
mostly with d = n − 2.
Given a point y ∈ Sd , the points z that are closest to y comprise a spherical
cap. The spherical cap of center y and height t ∈ [−1, 1] is C(y; t) = {z ∈ Sd |
hy, zi > t}. By symmetry, z ∈ C(y; t) if and only if y ∈ C(z; t). The one-sided
linear p-value is the fraction of xk for 0 6 k < N that belong to C(y 0 ; ρ̂). A
natural, but crude approximation to p is then
p̂1 (ρ̂),
where
p̂1 (t) ≡
vol(C(y 0 ; t))
.
vol(Sd )
Stolarsky’s invariance principal gives a remarkable description of the accuracy
of this approximation p̂1 . The squared L2 spherical cap discrepancy of points
x0 , x1 , . . . , xN −1 ∈ Sd is
Z 1Z
2
L2 (x0 , . . . , xN −1 ) =
|p̂1 (t) − p(z, t)|2 dσd (z) dt
−1
Sd
PN −1
where p(z, t) = (1/N ) k=0 1xk ∈C(z,t) and σd is the uniform (Haar) measure
on Sd . Stolarsky (1973) shows that
dωd
× L2 (·)2 =
ωd+1
Z
Z
kx − yk dσd (x) dσd (y) −
Sd
Sd
N −1
1 X
kxk − xl k
N2
(1.3)
k,l=0
where ωd is the (surface) volume of Sd . Equation (1.3) relates the mean squared
error of p̂1 to the mean absolute Euclidean distance among the N points. In our
applications, the N points will be the distinct permuted values of x0 , but (1.3)
holds for an arbitrary set of N points xk .
The left side of (1.3) is, up to normalization, a mean squared discrepancy over
spherical caps. This average of (p̂1 − p)2 includes p-values of all sizes between 0
and 1. It is not then a very good accuracy measure when p̂1 (ρ̂) turns out to be
very small, such as 10−6 . It would be more useful to get such a mean squared
error taken over caps of exactly the size p̂1 (ρ̂), and no others.
Brauchart and Dick (2013) consider quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC) sampling in
the sphere. They generalize Stolarsky’s discrepancy formula to include a weighting function on the height t. By specializing their formula, we get an expression
for the mean of (p̂1 − p)2 over spherical caps of any fixed size.
Discrepancy theory plays a prominent role in QMC (Niederreiter, 1992),
which is about approximating an integral by a sample average. The present
He, Basu, Zhao & Owen/Stolarsky invariance for permutations
5
setting is a reversal of QMC: the discrete average p over permutations is the
exact value we seek, and the integral over a continuum is the approximation p̂.
A second difference is that the QMC literature focusses on choosing N points
to minimize a criterion such as (1.3), whereas here the N points are determined
by the problem.
As we will show below, the estimate p̂1 is the average of p over all spherical
caps C(y; ρ̂) under a uniform distribution, i.e., y ∼ U(Sd ). Those caps have the
same volume as C(y 0 ; ρ̂).
In addition to specializing from caps C(y; t) with t = ρ̂ we can also specialize
to caps whose centers y more closely resemble y 0 . Suppose that
y 0 ∈ Y ⊂ Sd .
Then we know that p(y 0 , ρ̂) 6 supy∈Y p(y, ρ̂), which is a conservative permutation p-value. We are generally unable to compute this quantity but in some
instances we can form a reference distribution y ∼ U(Y) and compute both
E(p(y, ρ̂) | y ∈ Y) and Var(p(y, ρ̂) | y ∈ Y), the mean and variance of p(y, ρ̂)
under this distribution.
The simplest reference distribution we use has Y1 = Sd . We have found
that the set Y2 = {y ∈ Sd | y T x0 = y T
0 x0 } and some generalizations yield
especially useful reference distributions. Generalizations of the Stolarsky formula
allow us to compute Var(p(y, ρ̂) | y ∈ Y2 ). In some of our numerical results
from Section 7, we find that Var(p(y, ρ̂) | y ∈ Y2 ) is so small that the true
permutation p-value p(y 0 , ρ̂) must be of the same order of magnitude as the
estimate p̂2 ≡ E(p(y, ρ̂) | y ∈ Y2 ) that we study at length.
We obtain p̂2 and the mean square discrepancy over its reference distribution by further extending Brauchart and Dick’s generalization of Stolarsky’s
invariance. More generally, we can replace the constraint hy, x0 i = hy 0 , x0 i by
hy, xc i = hy 0 , xc i for any individual c ∈ {0, 1, . . . , N − 1}. Our estimate p̂3 takes
xc to be whichever permuted point xk happens to be closest to y 0 .
Smaller sets Y could be even better than Y2 . In the extreme, if we could work
with Y that satisfies hy, xk i = hy 0 , xk i, for all 0 6 k < N then all y ∈ Y would
have p(y, ρ̂) = p(y 0 , ρ̂) = p and the mean over y ∈ Y would have no error. Any
smaller set is only useful if we can efficiently compute with it.
Although we found these results via invariance, we can also obtain them via
probabilistic arguments. As a consequence we have a probabilistic derivation
of Stolarsky’s formula. Bilyk et al. (2016) have independently found this connection. Some of our results are for arbitrary x, but our best computational
formulas are for the case where the variable x is binary, as it is for the Parkinson’s disease data sets.
Outline
The rest of the paper is organized as follows. Section 2 presents some context
on permutation tests and gives some results from spherical geometry. In Section 3 we use Stolarsky’s invariance principle as generalized by Brauchart and
He, Basu, Zhao & Owen/Stolarsky invariance for permutations
6
Dick (2013) to obtain the mean squared error between the true p-value and its
continuous approximation p̂1 , averaging over all spherical caps of volume p̂1 .
This section also has a probabilistic derivation of that mean squared error. In
Section 4 we describe some finer approximations p̃ for the p-value. These use
the set Y2 to condition on not just the volume of the spherical cap but also on
its distance from the original data point x0 , or from some other point, such as
the closest permutation of x0 to y 0 . By always including the original point we
ensure that p̃ > 1/N . That is a desirable property because the true permutation p-value cannot be smaller than 1/N . In Section 5 we modify the proof in
Brauchart and Dick (2013), to further generalize their invariance results to include the mean squared error of the finer approximations. Section 6 extends our
estimates to two-sided testing. Section 7 illustrates our p-value approximations
numerically. We see that an RMS error in the estimate p̂2 is of the same order of
magnitude as p̂2 itself. That is, p̂2 has a relative error property like saddlepoint
estimates do. Section 8 makes a numerical comparison to saddlepoint methods
in simulated data. The saddlepoint estimates come out more accurate than p̂2
but are biased low in the simulated examples. Section 9 compares the accuracy
of our approximations to each other and to the saddlepoint approximation for
6180 gene sets and some Parkinson’s disease data sets. In the data examples,
the new approximations come out closer to some gold standard estimates (based
on large Monte Carlo samples) than the saddlepoint estimates do, which once
again are biased low. From Table 6.3 of He (2016), the saddlepoint computations
take roughly 30 times longer than p̂2 does. Section 10 draws some conclusions
and discusses the challenges in getting a computationally feasible p-value that
accounts for both sampling uncertainty of (x, y) and the uncertainty in p̂ as an
estimate of p. Most of the proofs are in the Appendix, Section 11.
Software
The proposed approximations are implemented in the R package pipeGS on
CRAN. Given a binary input label and a gene expression measurement matrix,
it computes our three p value approximations for the linear gene set statistics.
Those statistics, p̂1 , p̂2 , p̂3 , are mentioned above and then presented in more
detail in Section 4. We provide an implementation of the saddlepoint approximation in the package as well.
2. Background and notation
The raw data contain points (Xi , Yi ) for i = 1, . . . , n, where Yi may be a composite quantity derived from all Ygi for g belonging to a gene set G, such
as Yi = YGi just before (1.2). We center and scale vectors (X1 , X2 , . . . , Xn )
and (Y1 , Y2 , . . . , Yn ) yielding x0 , y 0 ∈ Sd for d = n − 1. Both points belong to
{z ∈ Sn−1 | z T 1n = 0}. We can use an orthogonal matrix to rotate the points
of this set onto Sn−2 × {0}. As a result, we may simply work with x0 , y 0 ∈ Sd
where d = n − 2.
He, Basu, Zhao & Owen/Stolarsky invariance for permutations
7
The sample correlation of these variables is ρ̂ = xT
0 y 0 = hx0 , y 0 i. We use
hx0 , y 0 i when we find that geometrical thinking is appropriate and to conform
with Brauchart and Dick (2013). We use xT
0 y 0 to emphasize computational or
algebraic connotations.
Here we develop approximations to the one-sided p-value as that simplifies
notation. Section 6 shows how to obtain the corresponding two-sided p-values.
We assume that ρ̂ > 0 for otherwise p̂1 is going to be too large to be interesting.
For instance with m0 = m1 , ρ̂ 6 0 implies that p̂1 > 1/2.
Our proposals are computationally most attractive in the case where Xi takes
on just two values, such as 0 and 1. Then ρ̂ is a two-sample test statistic for
a difference in means. When there are m0 observations with
p Xi = 0 and m1
m1 /(nm0 ) and m1
with Xi = 1 then x0 contains
m
components
equal
to
−
0
p
components equal to + m0 /(nm1 ). Computational costs are often sensitive to
the smaller sample size, m ≡ min(m0 , m1 ).
1
For this two-sample case there are only N = m0m+m
distinct permuta0
tions of x0 . We have called these x0 , x1 , . . . , xN −1 and the true p value is
PN −1
PN −1
p = (1/N ) k=0 1(xT
k y 0 > ρ̂) = (1/N )
k=0 1(xk ∈ C(y 0 ; ρ̂)).
Now suppose that there are exactly r indices for which xk is positive and x`
is negative. There are then r indices with the reverse pattern too. We say that
xk and x` are at ‘swap distance r’ because r zeros from xk swapped positions
with ones to yield x` . In that case we easily find that
u(r) ≡ hxk , x` i = 1 − r
1
1
+
.
m0
m1
(2.1)
We need some geometric properties of the unit sphere and spherical caps. The
surface volume of Sd is ωd = 2π (d+1)/2 /Γ((d + 1)/2). We use σd for the volume
element in Sd normalized so that σd (Sd ) = 1. The spherical cap C(y; t) = {z ∈
Sd | z T y > t} has volume
(
1
I1−t2 d2 , 21 ,
06t61
2
σd (C(y; t)) =
d 1
1
2
1 − 2 I1−t 2 , 2 , −1 6 t < 0
where It (a, b) is the incomplete beta function
1
It (a, b) =
B(a, b)
Z
t
xa−1 (1 − x)b−1 dx
0
R1
with B(a, b) = 0 xa−1 (1 − x)b−1 dx. Obviously, this volume is 0 if t < −1 and
it is 1 if t > 1. This volume is independent of y so we may write σd (C(· , t)) for
the volume.
Our first approximation of the p-value is p̂1 (ρ̂) = σd (C(y; ρ̂)). We remarked
earlier that this approximation equates a discrete fraction to a volume ratio. We
show in Proposition 2 that p̂1 = E(p | hx0 , yi = ρ̂) for y ∼ U(Sd ) as y 0 would
if the original Yi were IID Gaussian. In Theorem 4, we find Var(p̂1 ) under this
assumption.
He, Basu, Zhao & Owen/Stolarsky invariance for permutations
8
d
d
We frequently
√ need to project y ∈ S onto a point x ∈ S . In this representation y = tx + 1 − t2 y ∗ where t = y T x ∈ [−1, 1] and y ∗ ∈ {z ∈ Sd | z T x = 0}
which is isomorphic to Sd−1 . The coordinates t and y ∗ are unique. From equation
(A.1) in Brauchart and Dick (2013) we get
dσd (y) =
ωd−1
(1 − t2 )d/2−1 dt dσd−1 (y ∗ ).
ωd
(2.2)
In their case x was (0, 0, . . . , 1).
The intersection of two spherical caps of common height t is
C2 (x, y; t) ≡ C(x; t) ∩ C(y; t).
We will need the volume of this intersection. Lee and Kim (2014) give a general
solution for spherical cap intersections without requiring equal heights. They
enumerate 25 cases, but our case does not correspond to any single case of
theirs and so we obtain the formula we need directly, below. We suspect it must
be known already, but we were unable to find it in the literature.
Lemma 1. Let x, y ∈ Sd and −1 6 t 6 1 and put u = xT y. Let V2 (u; t, d) =
σd (C2 (x, y; t)). If u = 1, then V2 (u; t, d) = σd (C(x; t)). If −1 < u < 1, then
Z
d
ωd−1 1
(1 − s2 ) 2 −1 σd−1 (C(y ∗ ; ρ(s))) ds,
V2 (u; t, d) =
ωd t
p
where ρ(s) = (t − su)/ (1 − s2 )(1 − u2 ). Finally, for u = −1,
(
0,
t>0
V2 (u; t, d) = ωd−1 R |t|
−1
2 d
(1 − s ) 2 ds, else.
ωd
−|t|
(2.3)
(2.4)
Proof. Let z ∼ U(Sd ). Then V2 (u; t, d) = σd (C2 (x, y; t)) = Pr(z ∈ C2 (x, y; t)).
If u = 1 then x = y and√so C2 (x, y; t) = C(x; t).√For u < 1, we project y and
z onto x, via z = sx + 1 − s2 z ∗ and y = ux + 1 − u2 y ∗ . Now
Z
V2 (u; t, d) =
1(hx, zi > t)1(hy, zi > t) dσ(z)
Sd
1
Z
=
d
ωd−1
(1 − s2 ) 2 −1
ωd
p
p
1(su + 1 − s2 1 − u2 hy ∗ , z ∗ i > t) dσd−1 (z ∗ ) ds.
1(s > t)
−1
Z
×
Sd−1
If u > −1 then this reduces to (2.3). For u = −1 we get
V2 (u; t, d) =
which reduces to (2.4).
ωd−1
ωd
Z
1
−1
d
1(s > t)1(−s > t)(1 − s2 ) 2 −1 ds.
He, Basu, Zhao & Owen/Stolarsky invariance for permutations
9
When we give probabilistic arguments and interpretations we do so for a random center y of a spherical cap. That random center is taken from two reference
distributions. Those are distributions 1 and 2 below. Reference distribution 1
is illustrated in Figure 1. Distribution 2 is illustrated in Figure 2 of Section 4
where we first use it.
Reference distribution 1. The vector y ∼ U(Y1 ) where Y1 = Sd . Expectation
under this distribution is denoted E1 (·).
Reference distribution 2. The vector y ∼ U(Y2 ) where
Y2 = {z ∈ Sd | z T xc = ρ̃},
p
for some −1 6 ρ̃ 6 1, and c ∈ {0, 1, . . . , N − 1}. Then y = ρ̃xc + 1 − ρ̃2 y ∗
for y ∗ uniformly distributed on a subset of Sd isomorphic to Sd−1 . Expectation
under this distribution is denoted E2 (·).
Reference distribution 1 holds true if the Yi are IID Gaussian random variables (with positive variance). In that case, the estimate p̂1 is the same as we
would get under a t-test. Reference distribution 2 is a significant narrowing of
reference distribution 1 in the direction of the ultimate reference distribution: a
point mass on y = y 0 .
3. Approximation via spherical cap volume
Here we study the approximate p-value p̂1 (ρ̂) = σd (C(y; ρ̂)). First we find the
mean squared error of this approximation over all spherical caps of the given
volume via invariance. Next we give a probabilistic interpretation which includes
the conditional unbiasedness result in Proposition 2 below. Then we give two
computational simplifications, first taking advantage of the permutation structure of our points, and then second for permutations of a binary vector. We
begin by restating the invariance principle.
Theorem 1. Let x0 , . . . , xN −1 be any points in Sd . Then
Z 1Z
N −1
N −1
2
1 X
1
1 X
kx
−
x
k
+
σ
(C(z;
t))
−
1
(x
)
dσd (z) dt
k
`
k
d
C(z;t)
N2
Cd −1 Sd
N
k,`=0
k=0
Z Z
=
kx − yk dσd (x) dσd (y)
Sd
Sd
where Cd = ωd−1 /(dωd ).
Proof. Stolarsky (1973).
Brauchart and Dick (2013) gave a simple proof of Theorem 1 using reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces. They also generalized Theorem 1 as follows.
He, Basu, Zhao & Owen/Stolarsky invariance for permutations
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
Sd
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
y0
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
y1
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
10
●
Fig 1: Illustration for reference distribution 1. The point y is uniformly distributed over Sd . The small open circles represent permuted vectors xk . The
point y 0 is the observed value of y. The circle around it goes through x0 and
represents a spherical cap of height y T
0 x0 . A second spherical cap of equal volume is centered at y = y 1 . We study moments of p(y, ρ̂), the fraction of xk in
the cap centered at random y.
Theorem 2. Let x0 , . . . , xN −1 be any points in Sd . Let v : [−1, 1] → (0, ∞) be
any function with an antiderivative. Then
Z 1
Z
N −1
2
1 X
1C(z;t) (xk ) dσd (z) dt
v(t)
σd (C(z; t)) −
N
−1
Sd
k=0
(3.1)
Z
Z
N
−1
X
1
= 2
Kv (xk , x` ) −
Kv (x, y) dσd (x) dσd (y)
N
Sd Sd
k,l=0
where Kv (x, y) is a reproducing kernel function defined by
Z 1
Z
Kv (x, y) =
v(t)
1C(z;t) (x)1C(z;t) (y) dσd (z) dt.
−1
(3.2)
Sd
Proof. See Theorem 5.1 in Brauchart and Dick (2013)
If we set v(t) = 1 and K(x, y) = 1 − Cd kx − yk, then we recover the original
Stolarsky formula. Note that the statement of Theorem 5.1 in Brauchart and
He, Basu, Zhao & Owen/Stolarsky invariance for permutations
11
Dick (2013) has a sign error in their counterpart to (3.1). The corrected statement (3.1) can be verified by comparing equations (5.3) and (5.4) of Brauchart
and Dick (2013).
We would like a version of (3.1) just for one value of t such as t = ρ̂ = xT
0 y0 .
For ρ̂ ∈ [−1, 1) and = (1 , 2 ) ∈ (0, 1)2 , let
v (t) = 2 +
1
1(ρ̂ 6 t 6 ρ̂ + 1 ).
1
(3.3)
Each v satisfies the conditions of Theorem 2 making (3.1) an identity in . We
let 2 → 0 and then 1 → 0 on both sides of (3.1) for v = v yielding Theorem 3.
Theorem 3. Let x0 , x1 , . . . , xN −1 ∈ Sd and t ∈ [−1, 1]. Then
Z
|p(y, t) − p̂1 (t)|2 dσd (y) =
Sd
N −1 N −1
1 X X
σd (C2 (xk , x` ; t)) − p̂1 (t)2 .
N2
(3.4)
k=0 `=0
Proof. See Section 11.1 of the Appendix which uses the limit argument described
above.
We now give a proposition that holds for all distributions of y ∈ Sd including
our reference distributions 1 and 2.
Proposition 1. For a random point y ∈ Sd ,
E(p(y, t)) =
N −1
1 X
Pr(y ∈ C(xk ; t)),
N
and
(3.5)
N −1
1 X
Pr(y ∈ C2 (xk , x` ; t)).
E(p(y, t) ) = 2
N
(3.6)
k=0
2
k,`=0
Proposition 2. For any x0 , . . . , xN −1 ∈ Sd and t ∈ [−1, 1], p̂1 (t) = E1 (p(y, t)).
h 1 NP
i
−1
Proof. E1 (p(y, t)) = E1
1C(y;t) (xk ) = σd (Cd (y; t)) = p̂1 (t).
N k=0
Combining Propositions 1 and 2 with Theorem 3 we find that if y ∼ U(Sd ),
as it would for IID Gaussian Yi , then p(y, ρ̂) is a random variable with mean
p̂1 (ρ̂) and variance given by (3.4) with t = ρ̂. Here ρ̂ = xT
0 y 0 is fixed while y is
random.
The right hand side of (3.4) sums O(N 2 ) terms. In a permutation analysis
1
we might have N = n! or N = m0m+m
for binary Xi , and so the computational
0
cost could be high. The symmetry in a permutation set allows us to use
Z
Sd
|p(y, t) − p̂1 (t)|2 dσd (y) =
N −1
1 X
σd (C2 (x0 , xk ; t)) − p̂1 (t)2
N
k=0
instead. This expression costs O(N ), the same as the full permutation analysis.
The cost can be reduced for binary Xi .
He, Basu, Zhao & Owen/Stolarsky invariance for permutations
12
When the Xi are binary, then for fixed t, σd (C2 (xk , x` ; t)) just depends on
the swap distance r between xk and x` . Then
Z
|p(y, t) − p̂1 (t)|2 dσd (y) =
Sd
m
1 X
Nr V2 (u(r); t, d) − p̂1 (t)2
N r=0
for V2 (u(r); t, d) given in Lemma 1, where Nr =
pairs (xk , x` ) at swap distance r.
PN −1 PN −1
k=0
`=0
(3.7)
1(rk,` = r) counts
Theorem 4. Let x0 ∈ Sd be the centered and scaled vector from an experiment
with binary Xi of which
m0 are negative and m1 are positive. Let x0 , dx1 , . . . , xN −1
1
be the N = m0m+m
distinct permutations of x0 . If y ∼ U(S ), then for
0
t ∈ [−1, 1], and with u(r) defined in (2.1),
E(p(y, t)) = σd (C(y 0 ; t)), and
m
m1
1 X m0
V2 (u(r); t, d) − p̂1 (t)2 .
Var(p(y, t)) =
r
N r=0 r
Proof. There are
m0
r
m1
r
permuted points xi at swap distance r from x0 .
4. A finer approximation to the p-value
In the previous section, we studied the distribution of permutation p-values
p(y, t) with spherical cap centers y ∼ U(Sd ) and heights t = ρ̂. In this section,
we use reference distribution 2 to obtain a finer approximation to p(y 0 , ρ̂) by
studying the distribution of the p-values with centers y satisfying the constraint
hy, x0 i = hy 0 , x0 i = ρ̂. That is y has reference distribution 2, which is U(Y2 ).
Our methods also let us impose the constraint hy, xc i = hy 0 , xc i ≡ ρ̃ for
any c = 0, 1, 2, . . . , N − 1 that we like. Conditioning on hy, xc i = ρ̃ eliminates
many irrelevant y from consideration. In addition to our estimate p̂2 obtained
by xc = x0 , we consider a second choice. It is to choose xc to be the closest
permutation of x0 to y 0 . That is c = arg maxk hy 0 , xk i.
For an index c ∈ {0, 1, . . . , N − 1} conditioning as above leads to
p̃c = E2 (p(y, ρ̂)) = E1 (p(y, ρ̂) | y T xc = y T
0 xc ),
(4.1)
and our two special cases are
p̂2 ≡ p̃0 ,
and p̂3 ≡ p̃c ,
where
c = arg max hy 0 , xk i.
06k<N
(4.2)
For an illustration of reference distribution 2 see Figure 2.
Notice that p̂2 cannot go below 1/N because all of the points y that it includes
have x0 ∈ C(y; ρ̂). In fact x0 is on the boundary of this spherical cap. Since the
true value satisfies p > 1/N , having p̂2 > 1/N is a desirable property. Similarly,
p̂3 > 1/N because then xc is in general an interior point of C(y, ρ̂). We expect
He, Basu, Zhao & Owen/Stolarsky invariance for permutations
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
Sd
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
xc
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
y0
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
y2
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
y1
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
13
●
Fig 2: Illustration for reference distribution 2. The original response vector is
y 0 with y T
0 x0 = ρ̂ and x0 marked xc. We consider alternative y uniformly
distributed on the surface of C(x0 ; ρ̂) (dashed circle) with examples y 1 and
y 2 . Around each such y j there is a spherical cap of height ρ̂ that just barely
includes xc = x0 . The small open circles are permuted points xk . The fraction
of those open circles that belong to the spherical cap C(y, ρ̂) is p(y, ρ̂). We use
p̂2 = E2 (p(y, ρ̂)) and find an expression for E2 ((p̂2 − p(y, ρ̂))2 ).
that p̂3 should be more conservative than p̂2 and we see this numerically in
Section 7.
From Proposition 1, we can get our estimate p̃c and its mean squared error
by finding single and double inclusion probabilties for y.
To compute p̃c we need to sum N values Pr(y ∈ C(xk ; t) | y T xc = ρ̃) and for
p̃c to be useful we must compute it in o(N ) time. The computations are feasible
in the binary case (Xi at two levels), which we now focus on.
Let uj = xT
j = 1, 2, and let u3 = xT
1 x2 . Let the projection of y
j x0 forp
∗
2
on xc be y = ρ̃xc + 1 − ρ̃ y . Then the single and double point inclusion
probabilities under reference distribution 2 are
Z
P1 (u1 , ρ̃, ρ̂) =
1(hy, x1 i > ρ̂) dσd−1 (y ∗ ), and
(4.3)
Sd−1
Z
P2 (u1 , u2 , u3 , ρ̃, ρ̂) =
1(hy, x1 i > ρ̂)1(hy, x2 i > ρ̂) dσd−1 (y ∗ )
(4.4)
Sd−1
He, Basu, Zhao & Owen/Stolarsky invariance for permutations
14
where ρ̂ = hx0 , y 0 i. If two permutations of x0 are at swap distance r, then their
−1
inner product is u(r) = 1 − r(m−1
0 + m1 ) from equation (2.1).
p
Lemma 2. Let the projection of x1 onto xc be x1 = u1 xc + 1 − u21 x∗1 . Then
the single point inclusion probability from (4.3) is
(
1(ρ̃u1 > ρ̂),
u1 = ±1 or ρ̃ = ±1
P1 (u1 , ρ̃, ρ̂) =
(4.5)
σd−1 (C(x∗1 , ρ∗ )), u1 ∈ (−1, 1), ρ̃ ∈ (−1, 1)
where ρ∗ = (ρ̂ − ρ̃u1 )/
p
(1 − ρ̃2 )(1 − u21 ).
p
Proof. The projection of y onto xc is y = ρ̃xc + 1 − ρ̃2 y ∗ . Now
(
ρ̃u1 ,
u1 = ±1 or ρ̃ = ±1
p
p
hy, x1 i =
∗
∗
2
2
ρ̃u1 + 1 − ρ̃ 1 − u1 hy , x1 i , u1 ∈ (−1, 1), ρ̃ ∈ (−1, 1)
and the result easily follows.
We can now give a computable expression for p̃c and hence for p̂2 and p̂3 .
Theorem 5. For −1 6 ρ̂ 6 1 and −1 6 ρ̃ 6 1,
p̃c = E2 (p(y, ρ̂)) =
m
1 X m0
m1
P1 (u(r), ρ̃, ρ̂)
N r=0 r
r
(4.6)
where u(r) is given in equation (2.1), P1 (u(r), ρ̃, ρ̂) is given in equation (4.5)
and ρ̃ = xT
c y0 .
Proof. There are mr0 mr1 permutations of x0 at swap distance r from xc .
From (4.6) we see that p̃c can be computed in O(m) work. The mean squared
error for p̃c is more complicated and will be more expensive. We need the double
point inclusion probabilities and then we need to count the number of pairs
xk , x` forming a given set of swap distances among xk , x` , xc .
Lemma 3. For j = 1, 2, let rj be the swap distance of xj from xc and let r3 be
the swap distance between x1 and x2 . Let u1 , u2 , u3 be the corresponding inner
products given by (2.1). If there are equalities among x1 , x2 and xc , then the
double point inclusion probability from (4.4) is
x1 = x2 = xc
1(ρ̃ > ρ̂),
1(ρ̃ > ρ̂)P (u , ρ̃, ρ̂), x = x 6= x
1 2
1
c
2
P2 (u1 , u2 , u3 , ρ̃, ρ̂) =
1(ρ̃
>
ρ̂)P
(u
,
ρ̃,
ρ̂),
x
=
x
=
6
x
1
1
2
c
1
P1 (u2 , ρ̃, ρ̂),
x1 = x2 6= xc .
If x1 , x2 and xc are three distinct points with min(u1 , u2 ) = −1, then
(
1(−ρ̃ > ρ̂)P1 (u2 , ρ̃, ρ̂), u1 = −1
P2 (u1 , u2 , u3 , ρ̃, ρ̂) =
1(−ρ̃ > ρ̂)P1 (u1 , ρ̃, ρ̂), u2 = −1.
He, Basu, Zhao & Owen/Stolarsky invariance for permutations
15
m
m
z
}|1
{ z
}|0
{
xc = ( +, +, +, +, +, · · · , +, +, +, +, −, −, −, −, · · · , −, −, −, −, − )
m
m
z
}|1
{ z
}|0
{
x1 = ( +, +, +, · · · , +, −, −, −, · · · , −, +, +, +, · · · , +, +, +, −, · · · , − )
{z
} |
{z
}
|
r1
r1
m1
m
z
}|
{ z
}|0
{
x2 = ( +, · · · , +, −, −, · · · , −, +, · · · , +, −, · · · , −, +, +, · · ·, +, −, · · · , − )
| {z }
| {z }
δ1
|
{z
r2
δ2
}
|
{z
}
r2
Fig 3: Illustration of r1 , r2 , δ1 and δ2 . The points xc , x1 and x2 each have m0
negative and m1 positive components. For j = 1, 2 the swap distance between
xj and xc is rj . There are δ1 positive components of xc where both x1 and x2
are negative, and δ2 negative components of xc where both xj are positive.
Otherwise −1 < u1 , u2 < 1, and then
P2 (u1 , u2 , u3 , ρ̃, ρ̂)
1(ρ̃u1 > ρ̂)1(ρ̃u2 > ρ̂),
R 1 ω
d−1
d−2
(1 − t2 ) 2 −1 1(t > ρ1 )1(tu∗3 > ρ2 ) dt,
=
−1 ωd−1
R 1 ωd−2
2 d−1
2 −1 1(t > ρ )σ
−1 ω
(1
−
t
)
C x∗∗
1
d−2
2 , √
d−1
ρ̃ = ±1
ρ̃ 6= ±1, u∗3 = ±1
ρ2 −tu∗
3
1−t2
√
1−u∗2
3
dt,
ρ̃ 6= ±1, |u∗3 | < 1
where
u∗3 = p
u3 − u1 u2
p
1 − u21 1 − u22
and
ρ̂ − ρ̃uj
q
, j = 1, 2
ρj = p
1 − ρ̃2 1 − u2j
(4.7)
∗
∗
and x∗∗
2 is the residual from the projection of x2 on x1 .
Proof. See Section 11.2.
Next we consider the swap configuration among x1 , x2 and xc . Let xj be
at swap distance rj from xc , for j = 1, 2. We let δ1 be the number of positive
components of xc that are negative in both x1 and x2 . Similarly, δ2 is the
number of negative components of xc that are positive in both x1 and x2 . See
Figure 3. The swap distance between x1 and x2 is then r3 = r1 + r2 − δ1 − δ2 .
Let r = (r1 , r2 ), δ = (δ1 , δ2 ) and r = min(r1 , r2 ). We will study values of
r1 , r2 , r3 , δ1 , δ2 ranging over the following sets:
r1 , r2 ∈ R = {1, . . . , m}
δ1 ∈ D1 (r) = {max(0, r1 + r2 − m0 ), . . . , r}
δ2 ∈ D2 (r) = {max(0, r1 + r2 − m1 ), . . . , r},
and
r3 ∈ R3 (r) = {max(1, r1 + r2 − 2r), . . . , min(r1 + r2 , m, m0 + m1 − r1 − r2 )}.
He, Basu, Zhao & Owen/Stolarsky invariance for permutations
16
Whenever the lower bound for one of these sets exceeds the upper bound, we
take the set to be empty, and a sum over it to be zero. Note that while r1 = 0
is possible, it corresponds to x1 = xc and we will handle that case specially,
excluding it from R.
The number of pairs (x` , xk ) with a fixed r and δ is
m0
m1
m0 − δ1
m1 − δ2
m0 − r1
m1 − r1
c(r, δ) =
. (4.8)
δ1
δ2
r1 − δ1
r1 − δ2
r2 − δ1
r2 − δ2
Then the number of configurations given r1 , r2 and r3 is
X X
c(r, δ)1(r3 = r1 + r2 − δ1 − δ2 ).
c(r1 , r2 , r3 ) =
(4.9)
δ1 ∈D1 δ2 ∈D2
We can now get an expression for the expected mean squared error under
reference distribution 2 which combined with Theorem 5 for the mean provides
an expression for the mean squared error of p̃c .
Theorem 6. For −1 6 ρ̂ 6 1 and −1 6 ρ̃ 6 1,
m
X
m0
m1
1
P2 (1, u(r), u(r), ρ̃, ρ̂)
1(ρ̃
>
ρ̂)
+
2
r
r
N2
r=1
m
X
m0
m1
(4.10)
+
P1 (u(r), ρ̃, ρ̂)
r
r
r=1
X X X
+
c(r1 , r2 , r3 )P2 (u1 , u2 , u3 , ρ̃, ρ̂)
E2 (p(y, ρ̂)2 ) =
r1 ∈R r2 ∈R r3 ∈R3 (r)
where P2 (·) is the double inclusion probability in (4.4) and c(r1 , r2 , r3 ) is the
configuration count in (4.9).
Proof. See Section 11.3 of the Appendix.
In our experience, the cost of computing E2 (p(y, ρ̂)2 ) under reference distribution 2 is dominated by the cost of the O(m3 ) integrals required to get the P2 (·)
values in (4.10). The cost also includes an O(m4 ) component because c(r1 , r2 , r3 )
is also a sum of O(m) terms, but it did not dominate the computation at the
sample sizes we looked at (up to several hundred).
5. Generalized Stolarsky Invariance
Here we obtain the results for reference distribution 2 in a different way, by
extending the work by Brauchart and Dick (2013). They introduced a weight
on the height t of the spherical cap in the average. We now apply a weight
function to the inner product hz, xc i between the center z of the spherical cap
and a special point xc .
He, Basu, Zhao & Owen/Stolarsky invariance for permutations
17
Theorem 7. Let x0 , . . . , xN −1 be arbitrary points in Sd and v(·) and h(·) be
positive functions in L2 ([−1, 1]). Then for any x0 ∈ Sd , the following equation
holds,
N −1
2
1 X
v(t)
1C(z;t) (xk ) dσd (z) dt
h(hz, x i) σd (C(z; t)) −
N
−1
Sd
k=0
Z Z
N
−1
X
1
= 2
Kv,h,x0 (xk , x` ) +
Kv,h,x0 (x, y) dσd (x) dσd (y)
N
Sd Sd
Z
1
Z
0
(5.1)
k,`=0
−
N −1 Z
2 X
Kv,h,x0 (x, xk ) dσd (x)
N
Sd
k=0
where Kv,h,x0 : Sd × Sd → R is a reproducing kernel defined by
Z 1
Z
Kv,h,x0 (x, y) =
v(t)
h(hz, x0 i)1C(z;t) (x)1C(z;t) (y) dσd (z) dt.
(5.2)
Sd
−1
Proof. See Section 11.4 of the Appendix.
Remark. We will use this result for x0 = xc , where xc is one of the N given
points. The theorem holds for general x0 ∈ Sd , but the result is computationally
and statistically more attractive when x0 = xc .
We now show that the second moment in Theorem 6 holds as a special limiting
case of Theorem 7. In addition to v from Section 3 we introduce η = (η1 , η2 ) ∈
(0, 1)2 and
hη (s) = η2 +
η1 ( ωωd−1
(1
d
1
1(ρ̃ 6 s 6 ρ̃ + η1 )
− s2 )d/2−1 )
(5.3)
Using these results we can now establish the following theorem, which provides the second moment of p(y, ρ̂) under reference distribution 2.
Theorem 8. Let x0 ∈ Sd be the centered and scaled vector from an experiment
with binary Xi of which
m0 are negative and m1 are positive. Let x0 , x1 , . . . , xN −1
1
be the N = m0m+m
distinct permutations of x0 . Let xc be one of the xk and
0
define p̃c by (4.1). Then
E2 (p̃c (y, ρ̂)2 ) =
N −1 Z
1 X
1(hy, xk i > ρ̂)1(hy, x` i > ρ̂) dσd−1 (y ∗ )
N2
Sd−1
k,`=0
where y = ρ̃xc +
p
1 − ρ̃2 y ∗ .
Proof. The proof uses Theorem 7 with a sequence of h defined in (5.3) and v
defined in (3.3). See Section 11.5 of the appendix.
This result shows that we can use the invariance principle to derive the second
moment of p(y, ρ̂) under reference distribution 2. The mean square in Theorem 8
is consistent with the second moment equation (3.6) in Proposition 1.
He, Basu, Zhao & Owen/Stolarsky invariance for permutations
18
6. Two-sided p-values
In statistical applications it is more usual to report two-sided p-values. A conservative approach is to use 2 min(p, 1 − p) where p is a one-sided p-value. A
sharper choice is
N −1
1 X
p=
1(|xT
k y 0 | > |ρ̂|).
N
k=0
This choice changes our estimate under reference distribution 2. It also changes
the second moment of our estimate p̂1 .
The two-sided version of the estimate p̂1 (ρ̂) is 2σd (C(y; |ρ̂|)), the same as if
we had doubled a one-sided estimate. Also E1 (p) = p̂1 in the two-sided case.
We now consider the mean square for the two-sided estimate under reference
distribution 1. For x1 , x2 ∈ Sd with u = xT
1 x2 , the two-sided double inclusion
probability under reference distribution 1 is
Z
Ṽ2 (u; t, d) =
1(|z T x1 | > |t|)1(|z T x2 | > |t|) dσd (z).
Sd
T
Writing 1(|z xi | > |t|) = 1(z T xk > |t|) + 1(z T (−xk ) > |t|) for k = 1, 2 and
expanding the product, we get
Ṽ2 (u; t, d) = 2V2 (u; |t|, d) + 2V2 (−u; |t|, d).
By replacing V2 (u, t, d) with Ṽ2 (u, t, d) and p̂1 (t) with 2σd (C(y; |t|)) in Theorem 4, we get the variance of two-sided p-values under reference distribution 1.
To obtain corresponding formulas under reference distribution 2, we use the
T
usual notation. Let uj = xT
j x0 for j = 1, 2, and let u3 = x1 x2 . Let the projection
p
of y on xc be y = ρ̃xc + 1 − ρ̃2 y ∗ . Now
Z
P̃1 (u1 , ρ̃, ρ̂) =
1 |hy, x1 i| > |ρ̂| dσd−1 (y ∗ ), and,
(6.1)
d−1
ZS
P̃2 (u1 , u2 , u3 , ρ̃, ρ̂) =
1 |hy, x1 i| > |ρ̂| 1 |hy, x2 i| > |ρ̂| dσd−1 (y ∗ ) (6.2)
Sd−1
are the appropriate single and double inclusion probabilities.
After writing 1(|hy, xk i| > |ρ̂|) = 1(hy, xk i > |ρ̂|) + 1(hy, −xk i > |ρ̂|) for
k = 1, 2 and expanding the product, we get
P̃1 (u1 , ρ̃, ρ̂) = P1 (u1 , ρ̃, |ρ̂|) + P1 (−u1 , ρ̃, |ρ̂|),
and
P̃2 (u1 , u2 , u3 , ρ̃, ρ̂) = P2 (u1 , u2 , u3 , ρ̃, |ρ̂|) + P2 (−u1 , u2 , −u3 , ρ̃, |ρ̂|)
+ P2 (u1 , −u2 , −u3 , ρ̃, |ρ̂|) + P2 (−u1 , −u2 , u3 , ρ̃, |ρ̂|).
Changing P1 (u1 , ρ̃, ρ̂) and P2 (u1 , u2 , u3 , ρ̃, ρ̂) to P̃1 (u1 , ρ̃, ρ̂) and P̃2 (u1 , u2 , u3 , ρ̃, ρ̂)
respectively in Theorems 5 and 6, we get the first and second moments for twosided p-values under reference distribution 2.
For a two-sided p-value, p̂3 is calculated with xc where c̃ = arg maxk |hy 0 , xk i|.
For m0 = m1 , c̃ = c = arg maxk hy 0 , xk i, but the result may differ significantly
for unequal sample sizes.
He, Basu, Zhao & Owen/Stolarsky invariance for permutations
19
7. Numerical Results
We consider two-sided p-values in this section. The main finding is that the root
mean squared error (RMSE) of p̂2 under reference distribution 2 is usually just
a small multiple of p̂2 itself.
First we evaluate the accuracy of p̂1 , the simple spherical cap volume approximate p value. We considered m0 = m1 in a range of values from 5 to 200. The
values p̂1 ranged from just below 1 to 2 × 10−30 . We judge the accuracy of this
estimate by its RMSE. Under distribution 1 this is (E(p̂1 (ρ) − p(y, ρ))2 )1/2 for
y ∼ U(Sd ). Figure 4a shows this RMSE decreasing towards 0 as p̂1 goes to 0
with ρ going to 1. The RMSE also decreases with increasing sample size, as we
would expect from the central limit theorem.
As seen in Figures 4a and 4b, the RMSE is not monotone in p̂1 . Right at
p̂1 = 1 we know that RMSE = 0 and around 0.1 there is a dip. The practically
interesting values of p̂1 are much smaller than 0.1, and the RMSE is monotone
for them.
A problem with p̂1 is that it can approach 0 even though p > 1/N must hold.
The distribution 1 RMSE does not reflect this problem. By studying E2 ((p̂1 (ρ)−
p(y, ρ))2 )1/2 , we get a different result. In Figure 4c, the RMSE of p̂1 under
distribution 2 reaches a plateau as p̂1 goes to 0.
The estimator p̂2 = p̃0 performs better than p̂1 because it makes more use
of the data, and it is never below 1/N . As seen in Figure 4d, the RMSE of
p̂2 very closely matches p̂2 itself as p̂2 decreases to zero. That is, the relative
error |p̂2 − p|/p̂2 is well behaved for small p-values. In rare event estimation,
that property is known as strong efficiency (Blanchet and Glynn, 2008) and can
be very hard to achieve. Here as p̂2 decreases to the granularity limit 1/N , its
RMSE actually decreases to 0. Eventually the distance from y 0 to x0 is below
the minimum interpoint distance among the xk and then, for a one-sided test,
p̂2 = p = 1/N .
The estimators p̂1 and p̂2 , do not differ much for larger p-values as seen in
Figure 5a. But in the limit as ρ̂ → 1 we see that p̂1 → 0, while p̂2 approaches
the granularity limit 1/N instead.
Figure 5b compares the RMSE of the two estimators under distribution 2. As
expected, p̂2 is more accurate. It also shows that the biggest differences occur
only when p̂1 goes below 1/N .
To examine the behavior of p̂2 more closely, we plot its coefficient of variation in Figure 6. We see that the relative uncertainty in p̂2 is not extremely
large. Even when the estimated p-values are as small as 10−30 the coefficient of
variation is below 5.
In Section 4, we mentioned another choice for xc . It was p̂3 = p̃c , where xc
is the closest permutation of x0 to y 0 . Figure 2.7 in He (2016) compares p̂3 to
p̂2 in some simulations. As expected, p̂3 tends to be larger (more conservative)
than p̂2 , though it does sometimes come out smaller. Figure 2.8 of He (2016)
compares the RMSE of p̂3 to p̂2 . The upward bias of p̂3 gave it a much larger
RMSE.
He, Basu, Zhao & Owen/Stolarsky invariance for permutations
−20
−30
−30
−20
−10
●●●●●
●●●●●●●●●● ●●●●●●●
●●●●●●●
●●
●●●●●●●
●
●●●●●●
●
●●●●●
●●●●●
●
●●●●●
●●●●●
●
●●●●●●
●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●
●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●
●●●●●●●●●●
●
●●●●●●●●●●
●●●●●●●●●●●
●●●●●●●●●●●
●●●●●●●●●●
●●●●●●●●●
●●●●●●●●
●●●●●●●
●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●
●●●
●●●●●
●●●●
●●
●
●
●
●●
●●●
●●
●●●
●●●
●
●●●
●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●●●●
●
●●
●●●●●
●●●
●●
●
●●●●●
●●
●●
●●●●
●●
●
●●●
●●
●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●
●●●
●●
●●
●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●
●●●●●●●
●●●
●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●
●●
●●●●●●●●●●●
●●●●●
● ●
●●●
●●●●●●
●●●●●●●●●
●●●
●●●●
●●
●
●●
●●●●
●●●●●●●●
●●●●
●●
●●
●●
●●●●
●● ● ●
●●●●
●●
●●
●●●
●●
●● ●
●●●●
●●●
●●
●●●●●●●●●●●●
● ●
●●●
●●
●
●
●●●
●●
●●●●●●●●●●●●●
● ●
●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●
●●
●●
●●●●●●●●●
●●●●
●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●
●●●●●●●
●●
●
●●●●●
●●●●●●●●●●●
●●●●●
●● ●●●
●●●
●●●●
●●
●●●●●●●●●
●●●●
●●
●● ●●
●●●●
●●●
●●●
●● ● ●
●●●
●● ●●●
●
●●●
●●
● ●●
●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●
●●●
●● ●
●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●
●●
●●●●●
●
●●●
● ●●●
●●●●●●●●●●●●●
●●●●●●
●●●
●●●●
●●
● ●
●
●
●
●
●
●●●●●●●●●●
●
●●●●
●
●●
●● ●
●●
●
● ●●
●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●
●●●
●●
●●●
● ● ●
●●
●●●●●●●●
●●●
●●●
●● ●
●●●
●●
●●
●●●●●
●●● ●● ● ●
●●●
●●●
●●●●
●●● ●●● ●●
●●
●● ●
●●
●
●●●●
●●●●
●●●
●●
●● ● ●
●●
●●●
●
●●
●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●
●●
●●
●● ●
●●●
●●
●
●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●
●●●●●●●
●●
● ●●● ●●● ●●●●●
●●●●●●●●●●●
●●●●●
● ● ●●
●
●
●
●●
●●●●
●●
● ●● ●●● ●●●●
●●●
●● ●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●●
● ●
● ● ●● ●●●
●●
●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●
●●
●●●●●●●●●●●●
●●●●●
●●
●●
●● ●●● ●● ●● ●●●
●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●
●●●●
●●
●●
●●●●●●●●
●●●
● ● ●
●●●
● ●●
●●●●●
●●●
●●
●●●
● ●● ●●
●●●●
●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●
●
●●
●●
●●●●●●●●●●●●
●●●●
●
●●●●●
● ● ●●
●
●●
●●
●●●
●
●●●●
● ●● ●●
●●
●●
●●●
●●●
●
●●
●●●
●●●
● ● ●●
●
●
●●
●●
●●●
●●●
●
●● ●●● ●●
●●
●
●●
●●
● ●●●
●●
●● ●● ●
● ●
●
●●
●● ● ● ●●●●●
● ●
●●
●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●
● ● ●●●● ●●
●●
●●●
●●●●●●
●
● ●
●●
●●●●●
●●
●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●
●
●●
●
●●●●
●●
●●●●●●●●●●●●●
●●●●●●
●●
●●●
●●
● ●
●
●●●●
●●●
●●
●●
● ●
●●
●●●
●●●
●
●
●●●
●
●
● ● ●
●
●
●●●
●●●
●
● ●●
● ● ●
●●
●●
●
●
●
●●
●●
● ●●● ●●
●●
●
●●
●●
●
●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
● ●
●●
●
●
●
●●
●
●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●
●
●●●●●●
●●●●●●●●●●●●●●
●●
●
●
●●● ●
●●●●
●●●●
●●
●
●
●
●●●
●
●●
●
●●●
●
●●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
●●
●
● ●
●
●●
●
●
● ● ●
●
●●
●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
● ● ●
● ●
●●●
● ●
●
●
−2
(m0, m1)
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
5,5
10,10
15,15
20,20
30,30
40,40
50,50
100,100
200,200
log10(RMSE1)
log10(RMSE1)
−10
●●●
●●
●●●●●
●●●
●●
●●●
●●
●●
●●●
● ●●
●●●
●●● ●●●●●●●●●●●
●●
●●●●
●● ●●●●●● ●
●●
●
●●
●●
●●●●●
●●●●● ●●
●●
●●
●●
●●●●●
●●●●●●●●●●●
●●● ●
●●
●●●●●●
●●●●●
●●
●● ●●●●●●
●●●●
●●
●●●●●
●● ●●●●
●● ●
●●
●●●●●●●●
●●●●
●
●●●●●
●●
●●●●●●
●●●●
●●●
●●
●●●●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●● ●●● ●●●● ●
●●●●●●●
●●
●●●●
●
●●
●
●
●●
●●●●●●
●●●●● ●● ●●●● ●
●●
●●●●●●●●
●●● ●● ●●● ●●● ●
●●
●●●●●●●●●● ●●●
●●●●●
●●
●
●
●
●● ● ●
●
●●●
●● ●●●●●
●●
●
● ●● ●●
●● ●●●●●●
●●
●● ●●●●●●
●●● ●● ●●
●●
●● ●●
●●
●●●●●● ●● ●●
●
●● ●●●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●● ●● ●
●●●
●●
●●
●
●●●●●●
●●
●●
●●●●●●●●●
●
●●●●●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●●●●●●●
●
●●●●●●●
●●
●●
●
●
●●●●●●●●
●●
●●
●●●●●●●●
●●
●●
●●●●●●
●
●●
●●
●
●●●●●●●
●●●●●●
●●
●●
●
●●
●●
●●
●●●●●●●●
●●
●●
●● ●●●●
●● ●●●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●●●●●●
●● ●●●●
●●
●●
●
●●
●● ●●●●●
●●
●●
●● ●●●
●●●●●●●
●●
●●
●● ●●●●
●●
●●
●●●●●●
●●
●●
●● ●●●●●
●●
●●
●● ●●●
● ●●
●●
●●
●●●● ●
●● ●●●●●
●●
●●
●●●●●● ●●
●●
●●
●●
●
●● ●●●●●●●
●●
●●
●●
●● ●●●●
●●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
● ●●●●●●● ●
●
●
●●
●
●●
●●
●● ●●
●
●●
●●
●●
●●●●●●
●●
●● ●●●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●● ●●●●
●● ●●●●
●●
●●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●● ● ●
●●
●●●
●●
●●
●● ●●●●
●●
●●
●●
●● ●●
● ●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●●●●●
●● ●●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●● ●●●●●
●●
●●
●●
●● ●●●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●● ●●●●●
●●
●●
●●
●● ●●●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●●●● ●●●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●●●●●●●●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●●●●●●●●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●●
●●
●●
●●●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●● ● ●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●●●● ●●●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●●●●● ● ●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●●●●● ●●●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●
●● ●●● ●●●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●● ●●●● ● ●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●● ●●●● ●●●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●● ●● ●●●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●● ●●●● ● ●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●● ●●●● ●●●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●● ●●● ● ●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●● ●●● ●●●●
●●
●●
●●
●● ●●●● ● ●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●● ●●● ●●●●
●●
●●
●●
●● ●●● ● ●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●● ●●● ●●●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●● ●●●● ●●●●
●●
●●
●● ●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●● ●●●●● ●●●●
●●
●●
●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●●● ●●●●
●●
●●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
● ●● ● ●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●●● ●● ●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●● ● ● ●●
●●
●●
●● ●● ●●●●
●●
●●
●●
●● ●● ●● ●
●●
●●
●●
●● ●● ● ●●
●●
●●
●●
●● ●● ●●●●
●●
●●
●● ●● ●● ●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●● ● ● ●●
●●
●● ●● ●● ●
●●
●●
●● ●● ● ●●
●●
●● ●● ●●●●
●●
●●
●● ● ●● ●
●●
●● ●● ● ●●
●●
●● ●● ●● ●
●●
●●
●● ●● ●● ●●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
● ●
●●
●● ●● ●● ●●
●●
●● ●●
● ●●
●●
●●
●● ●●
●● ●
●●
●
●●
● ●●
●●
●● ●●●
●●
●●●●
●●
●●
●● ●
●●
● ●●
●●
●●
●●●●
●●
●●
●●
●●
●●●●
●●
●●
●●●●
●●
●●
●●
●● ●
●●
● ●●
●●
●●
●●
●●●●
●●
●●
●●●●
●●
●●
●
●●
●
● ●●
●●
●●●●
●●
●● ●
●●
●● ●●
●●
●●
●● ●●
●●
●● ●●
●● ●●
●● ●●
●● ●●
●● ●●
●● ●●
●● ●●
●● ●●
●
●
●
●
−4
−6
●●●●●●●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
−8
−2.0
−1.5
−1.0
−0.5
0.0
log10(phat1)
(b) RMSE1 (p̂1 ) zoomed.
0
(m0, m1)
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
5,5
10,10
15,15
20,20
30,30
40,40
50,50
70,70
100,100
log10(RMSE2)
log10(RMSE1UNDER2)
−40
●
5,5
10,10
15,15
20,20
30,30
40,40
50,50
100,100
200,200
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
0
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
● ●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
●
●●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●
●●
●
●●
●●
●●●
●●
●● ●●
●
●●●●●●●●●● ●●●
●
●●
● ●
● ●●
●
● ●●
●● ●
●●●●●●●●●
● ●●
●
●
● ●
●
●
●●
●
●●●●●●●●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
(a) RMSE1 (p̂1 ).
−20
(m0, m1)
●
log10(phat1)
0
20
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
● ●
●
●●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●●
●
● ●
●
●
●
●
● ●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
●●
●●
●
● ●
●● ●
●● ●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●
●
●● ●
●
●● ●
●
●●
●
●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
●
● ●
●
● ●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
●
●● ●
−20
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
● ●
●
−40
(m0, m1)
●
●
●
5,5
10,10
15,15
20,20
30,30
40,40
50,50
70,70
100,100
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
● ● ● ● ● ● ●
●
●
●
−60
−60
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
−120
−90
−60
−30
0
−60
−40
log10(phat1)
(c) RMSE2 (p̂1 ).
−20
0
log10(phat2)
(d) RMSE2 (p̂2 ).
Fig 4: RMSEs for p̂1 and p̂2 under reference distributions 1 and 2. The x-axis
shows the estimate p̂ as ρ varies from 1 to 0. Here m0 = m1 . Plots with m0 6= m1
are similar.
8. Comparison to saddlepoint approximation
The small relative error property of p̂2 is similar to the relative error property
in saddlepoint approximations. Reid (1988) surveys saddlepoint approximations
and Robinson (1982) develops them for permutation tests of the linear statistics
we have considered here. When the true p-value is p, the saddlepoint approximation p̂s satisfies p̂s = p(1 + O(1/n)). Because we do not know the implied
constant in O(1/n) or the n at which it takes effect, the saddlepoint approximation does not provide a computable upper bound for the true permutation
p-value p.
He, Basu, Zhao & Owen/Stolarsky invariance for permutations
1.00
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●
●
●●
●●
●●
●● ●●
●●●●●●●●●●● ●●●
●
●●
●
●●
● ●
● ●●
●●
●●●●●●●●●● ●
● ●●
●
●
● ●
●
●
●
●
●●●●●●●●●●
−20
●
●
(m0, m1)
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
−40
●●●●●●●●●
●
●
●
●
5,5
10,10
15,15
20,20
30,30
40,40
50,50
70,70
100,100
●
●
●
●
●
●
RMSE2/RMSE1UNDER2
log10(phat2)
0
●
●
●
●
●
●
0.75
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●
●●
●
●●●
●
●
●
●●
● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●●
●
●●
●● ● ●
●
● ●●
●
●
●●●
●
●
● ●● ●●
●●●●
●●
●●
●●
●
●
●
●●●●
●●
●
● ● ●
●●
●
●
●
●
● ● ●●
●
●
●
●●● ● ●
●
● ● ●●
● ●●
●● ● ● ●
● ●
●
●● ●●● ●
●●
●● ● ●
●
●● ●●
●
● ●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
●
●●
●
● ●
●
● ●
●
● ●
0.50
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
0.25
●
●
●
●
●
●
0.00
●
●
−120
●
●
●
−90
log10(phat1)
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
5,5
10,10
15,15
20,20
30,30
40,40
50,50
70,70
100,100
●
●
0
●
●
●
●
−30
●
●
●
−60
●
●
● ●
●
●
−90
●
● ●
●
−120
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●
●●
●
●
●
−60
(m0, m1)
●
● ●
●
●
●
21
●
●●
●
●
●
●●
−60
●
●
●●
−30
●
●
●
●
● ● ●
● ●
● ●
● ●
●
● ●
● ●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
● ●
0
log10(phat1)
(a)
(b)
Fig 5: Comparison of p̂1 and p̂2 . In (a), log10 (p̂2 ) is plotted against log10 (p̂1 ) for
varying ρ’s. The black line is the 45 degree line. In (b), the ratio of RMSEs for
p̂1 and p̂2 is plotted against log10 (p̂1 ). The x-axis is log10 (p̂1 ).
●
●
●
●
●
●
RMSE2/phat2
10
(m0, m1)
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
●
5
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
● ●
●
●
●●
● ●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
0
●
●
●
●
−60
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
−40
5,5
10,10
15,15
20,20
30,30
40,40
50,50
70,70
100,100
●
●●●
●
●
●
●
● ● ● ●
●●●●
● ●
●
●
●● ● ●
●
●●
● ●● ● ●●●
●
● ●● ●
●●
● ●
● ●●●
●●● ●
●
●
●
●
●●●●
●●
●
●
●
●
●● ● ●●
●●
●
●
●
● ●
●
●●●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
● ●
●
●
●●
●
●
●
●
●●●
●
●
●
●
●●
●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
● ●
●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●
●●
●●●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
−20
0
log10(phat2)
Fig 6: The coefficient of variation for p̂2 with varying ρ’s.
Figure 7 compares our estimates to each other and those of the saddlepoint
approximation, equation (1) from Robinson (1982). The simulated data have the
Exp(1) distribution under the control condition and the 2 + Exp(1) distribution
under the affected condition. The sample sizes were m0 = m1 = 10 making it
feasible to compute the exact permutation p-value for hundreds of examples.
In each case we ran 500 independent simulations. Cases with perfect separation
were excluded: the saddlepoint approximation is numerically unstable then, and
He, Basu, Zhao & Owen/Stolarsky invariance for permutations
phat1
phat2
phat3
saddle.point
22
60
40
20
count
0
60
40
20
0
0.1
10.0
0.1
10.0
phat/p.exact
iid
Fig 7: Simulation results p̂/p as described in the text, for Y0,i ∼ Exp(1), and
iid
Y1,i ∼ Exp(1) + 2.
one can easily detect that the minimum Y value in one group is larger than
the maximum in the other group, showing that p = 1/N . In every instance we
compared two-sided p-values. Chapter 2 of He (2016) considers simulations from
some other distributions. The control condition data are t(5) , N (0, 1) and U(0, 1)
while the affected condition data are shifted versions of these distributions.
In these simulations, the naive spherical cap estimator p̂1 , with no good
relative error properties, is consistently least accurate and is often much smaller
than the true p. The saddlepoint estimate is very accurate but tends to come
out smaller than the true p. The estimators p̂2 and p̂3 are less likely to be
below p than the saddlepoint estimate, and by construction, they are never
below the granularity limit. Qualitatively similar results happened for all of the
distributions. The accuracy of all of these p-value estimates tends to be better
for ligher tailed Yi .
We can also construct Z scores, Z2 = (p − p̂2 )/RMSE2 and a similar Z3 . If
these take large values, then it means that p̂ is too small and, moreover, that
our computed RMSE does not diagnose it. The largest Z scores we observed are
.
in Table 1. The largest Z values arose for exponential data with p = 0.89 and
He, Basu, Zhao & Owen/Stolarsky invariance for permutations
Dist’n Y0,i
t(5)
Exp(1)
U(0, 1)
N (0, 1)
max Z2
max{Z2 | p̂2 < 0.1}
max Z3
23
max{Z3 | p̂3 < 0.1}
26.7
7.55
3.49
3.07
1.91
31.5
3.87
7.55
7.76
7.76
2.45
5.87
2.61
2.78
3.07
2.78
Table 1
Maximal Z scores observed for p̂2 and p̂3 in 500 independent replications.
First author
m1
m0
N =
m1 +m0
m1
11
18
3.5 × 107
29
14
7.9 × 1010
50
22
1.8 × 1018
Table 2
Sample sizes for three microarray studies.
Zhang
Moran
Scherzer
.
.
p̂2 = 0.78 = p̂3 . Such large p-values are not very important and so maximal Z
scores are also shown among estimated p-values below 0.1.
What we find is that the Z values are not very extreme. This suggests that it
might be feasible to get a conservative p-value estimate by adding some multiple
of the distribution 2 RMSE to p̂2 .
9. Data comparisons
Three data sets on Parkinson’s disease were used by Larson and Owen (2015)
and investigated in Chapter 6 of He (2016). They come from Scherzer et al.
(2007), Moran et al. (2006) and Zhang et al. (2005). Table 2 shows their sample
sizes.
For this comparison, there were 6180 gene sets from v5.1 of mSigDB’s gene
set collections. Curated gene sets and Gene Ontology gene sets were used. The
gene sets ranged in size from 5 to 2131 genes with an average size of 93.08 genes.
Slightly different versions of the gene sets were used in Larson and Owen (2015).
Ground truth estimates of two-sided p values for linear test statistics were
obtained using M = 106 permutations. When the estimate was below 10−4 , the
number M was increased to 107 . The Zhang data set had the smallest sample
size and had no gene sets significant at below 0.01 and so we do not compare
estimates for this gene set.
Table 3 gives correlations between log10 estimated and gold-standard p-values
for these genes. From Table 3, we see that p̂1 , p̂2 and p̂3 have nearly the same
correlations with the gold standard; indeed they correlate highly with each other.
They correlate with the gold standard estimate much more closely than the
saddlepoint estimator does. Figures in Chapter 6 of He (2016) give scatterplots.
These show the saddlepoint estimator is biased low and p̂3 is biased slightly
high. Statistics p̂1 and p̂2 are quite close, possibly because none of the gene sets
has a very small p-value.
While saddlepoint methods have a very desirable relative error property they
do have some numerical issues. Table 4 shows some timing data. We also got in-
He, Basu, Zhao & Owen/Stolarsky invariance for permutations
Data
Correlation
p̂1
p̂2
p̂3
p̂saddle
Moran
Moran
Pearson
Kendall
0.9997
0.9856
0.9997
0.9856
0.9997
0.9866
0.9937
0.9395
Scherzer
Scherzer
Pearson
Kendall
0.9997
0.9869
0.9997
0.9869
0.9997
0.9870
0.9837
0.8937
Moran Low
Moran Low
Pearson
Kendall
0.9501
0.8283
0.9504
0.8283
0.9653
0.8578
0.7125
0.5411
Scherzer Low
Scherzer Low
Pearson
Kendall
24
0.9940
0.9940
0.9947
0.8652
0.9429
0.9429
0.9429
0.7714
Table 3
The table gives both Pearson and Kendall correlations over 6180 gene sets, between
estimated log10 (p)-values and gold standard log10 (p)-values for both the Moran and
Scherzer data sets. The designation ‘Low’ refers to only the 190 gene sets with p-values in
the interval (10−5 , 10−4 ) for Moran, or the 15 gene sets with p-values in the interval
(10−5 , 10−3 ) for Scherzer.
Data Set
Saddle
Zhang
Moran
Scherzer
0.0631
0.0894
0.1394
p̂1
p̂2
0.0024
0.0031
0.0029
0.0037
0.0034
0.0045
Table 4
Average, over 6180 gene sets of the running time in seconds
p̂j , j = 1, 2, 3. Total time ranges from under 1/4 minute
p̂3
0.0032
0.0038
0.0047
for saddlepoint p-values and
to just over 14 minutes.
finite values for 95 of the gene sets on the Zhang data. It might be a convergence
issue or possibly a flaw in how we implemented saddlepoints.
10. Discussion
We have constructed approximations to the permutation p-value using probability and geometry derived from discrepancy theory. A rigorous upper bound
for p could be attained using L∞ spherical cap discrepancies instead of the L2
version, but computing such discrepancies is a major challenge. Narcowich et al.
(2010) give upper bounds for the L∞ spherical cap discrepancy, in terms of averages of a great many harmonic functions at the points xi . For our application
we need bounds for spherical caps of a fixed volume (under distribution 1) and
of fixed volume and constrained location (under distribution 2) and those go
beyond what is in Narcowich et al. (2010).
Many other approximation methods have been proposed for permutation
tests. For instance, Zhou et al. (2009) fit approximations by moments in the
Pearson family. Larson and Owen (2015) fit Gaussian and beta approximations
to linear statistics and gamma approximations to quadratic statistics for gene
set testing problems. Knijnenburg et al. (2009) fit generalized extreme value
distributions to the tails of sampled permutation values.
None of these approximations come with an all inclusive p-value that accounts for both numerical uncertainty of the estimation and sampling uncer-
He, Basu, Zhao & Owen/Stolarsky invariance for permutations
25
tainty behind the original data. IID sampling of permutations does come with
such a p-value if we add one to numerator and denominator as Barnard (1963)
suggests. Then the Monte Carlo p-value estimate p̂ is actually a conservative
p-value in it’s own right: Pr(p̂ 6 u) 6 u for 0 6 u 6 1 under the null hypothesis.
However, that method cannot attain very small p-values, and so a gap remains.
We have employed reference distributions in an effort to address this gap. We
select a set Y containing y 0 and find the first two moments of p(y, ρ̂) for y ∼
U(Y). If the data y 0 were actually sampled from our reference distribution, then
we could get an all inclusive conservative p-value via the Chebychev inequality.
To illustrate the Chebychev inequality, let µ = E(p(y, ρ̂)) and σ 2 = Var(p(y, ρ̂))
for the observed value ρ̂ = xT
0 y 0 and for random y ∼ U(Y) for some reference
set Y. Then Pr(p > µ + λσ) 6 1/(1 + λ2 ) for any λ > 0. Under this model,
p∗ = µ + λσ + 1/(1 + λ2 ) is a conservative p-value. Minimizing p∗ over λ reduces to solving 2λ = σ(1 + λ2 )2 . For small p we anticipate λ 1 and hence
λ0 = (2/σ)1/3 will be almost as good as the optimal λ we could find numerically.
That choice leads to p∗ 6 µ + (21/3 + 2−2/3 )σ 2/3 .
For a numerical illustration, consider µ = 10−30 and σ = 3 × 10−30 , roughly
describing the small p-value estimates from the case m0 = m1 = 70. Then
p∗ 6 4 × 10−20 , much larger than µ and yet still very small, likely small enough
to be significant after multiplicity adjustments.
The reference distributions describe a set in which p(y 0 , ρ̂) is known to lie.
Reference distribution 1 applies for Gaussian Yi and reference distribution 2 is
for Gaussian Yi after conditioning on y T x0 = y T
0 x0 . Of course, the data will
not ordinarily be exactly Gaussian. The numerical illustration uses a Chebychev
.
inequality at λ0 = 8.7 × 109 standard deviations.
As mentioned above, an L∞ version of the Stolarsky inequality would eliminate the need for Chebychev inequalities though it might also be very conservative. We do not know whether p(y, ρ̂) has a heavy tailed distribution under
reference distribution 2.
Our permutation points fall into a lattice subset of Rd intersected with the
unit sphere Sd . Our problem of counting the number of such points in a subset
is one that is addressed under the term ‘Geometry of numbers’. According to
a personal communication from Neil Sloane, the standard approach to such
problems is via the volume ratio, which in our setting is p̂1 which does not do
well for our problems.
To have reasonable power to obtain a p-value below by permutation sampling requires on the order of 1/ permutations each requiring O(n log(n)) computation to generate and O(n) computation to evaluate the inner product. The
cost to compute the standard errors in our method is dominated by a cost
proportional to m3 though there is a very small cost proportional to m4 . In
the range where the first cost dominates, our proposal is advantageous when
m3 = o(n/). Supposing that m0 and m1 are comparable, our advantage holds
when m2 = o(1/). If only the estimate and not the standard error is required,
then our p̂2 and p̂3 cost O(m) once the ρ̂ (cost O(n)) has been computed. Then
the total cost is O(n) compared to the much larger cost O(n/) for sampling.
He, Basu, Zhao & Owen/Stolarsky invariance for permutations
26
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the US National Science Foundation under grants
DMS-1407397 and DMS-1521145. We thank John Robinson and Neil Sloane for
helpful comments.
References
Ackermann, M. and Strimmer, K. (2009). A general modular framework for
gene set enrichment analysis. BMC Bioinformatics, 10:1–20.
Aronszajn, N. (1950). Theory of reproducing kernels. Transactions of the American Mathematical society, 68(3):337–404.
Barnard, G. A. (1963). Discussion of the spectral analysis of point processes
(by m. s. bartlett). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, series B, 25:294.
Bilyk, D., Dai, F., and Matzke, R. (2016). Stolarsky principle and energy optimization on the sphere. Technical report.
Blanchet, J. and Glynn, P. (2008). Efficient rare-event simulation for the maximum of heavy-tailed random walks. The Annals of Applied Probability, pages
1351–1378.
Brauchart, J. and Dick, J. (2013). A simple proof of Stolarsky’s invariance
principle. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 141(6):2085–
2096.
Fadista, J., Manning, A. K., Florez, J. C., and Groop, L. (2016). The (in) famous
GWAS p-value threshold revisited and updated for low-frequency variants.
European Journal of Human Genetics, 24(8):1202–1205.
He, H. (2016). Efficient Permutation-Based P-Value Estimation for Gene Set
Tests. PhD thesis, Stanford University.
Jiang, Z. and Gentleman, R. (2007). Extensions to gene set enrichment. Bioinformatics, 23(3):306–313.
Knijnenburg, T. A., Wessels, L. F. A., Reinders, M. J. T., and Shmulevich,
I. (2009). Fewer permutations, more accurate p-values. Bioinformatics,
25(12):i161–i168.
Larson, J. L. and Owen, A. B. (2015). Moment based gene set tests. BMC
Bioinformatics, 16(1):132.
Lee, Y. and Kim, W. C. (2014). Concise formulas for the surface area of the
intersection of two hyperspherical caps. Technical report, Korea advanced
institute of science and technology.
Moran, L. B., Duke, D. C., Deprez, M., Dexter, D. T., Pearce, R. K. B., and
Graeber, M. B. (2006). Whole genome expression profiling of the medial and
lateral substantia nigra in parkinsons disease. Neurogenetics, 7(1):1–11.
Narcowich, F. J., Sun, X., Ward, J. D., and Wu, Z. (2010). Leveque type
inequalities and discrepancy estimates for minimal energy configurations on
spheres. Journal of Approximation Theory, 162(6):1256–1278.
Niederreiter, H. (1992). Random Number Generation and Quasi-Monte Carlo
Methods. SIAM, Philadelphia, PA.
He, Basu, Zhao & Owen/Stolarsky invariance for permutations
27
Reid, N. (1988). Saddlepoint methods and statistical inference. Statistical Science, pages 213–227.
Robinson, J. (1982). Saddlepoint approximations for permutation tests and
confidence intervals. Journal of the Royal statistical society,Series B, pages
91–101.
Scherzer, C. R., AC, A. C. E., Morse, L. J., Liao, Z., Locascio, J. J., Fefer,
D., Schwarzschild, M. A., Schlossmacher, M. G., Hauser, M. A., Vance, J. M.,
Sudarsky, L. R., Standaert, D. G., Growdon, J. H., Jensen, R. V., and Gullans,
S. R. (2007). Molecular markers of early Parkinson’s disease based on gene
expression in blood. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 104(3):955–60.
Stolarsky, K. B. (1973). Sums of distances between points on a sphere. II.
Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 41(2):575–582.
Zhang, Y., James, M., Middleton, F. A., and Davis, R. L. (2005). Transcriptional analysis of multiple brain regions in Parkinson’s disease supports the
involvement of specific protein processing, energy metabolism, and signaling
pathways, and suggests novel disease mechanisms. American J Med Genet B
Neuropsychiatry Genet, 137B(1):5–16.
Zhou, C., Wang, H. J., and Wang, Y. M. (2009). Efficient moments-based
permutation tests. In Advances in neural information processing systems,
pages 2277–2285.
11. Appendix
Here we collect up some of the longer proofs.
11.1. Proof of Theorem 3 (Limiting invariance)
Here we show that taking limits as goes to zero in the formula of Brauchart
and Dick (2013) proves Theorem 3. We use three lemmas, one for each term in
Theorem 2. We use → 0 as a shorthand for lim1 →0+ lim2 →0+ .
Lemma 4. Let v be defined as in (3.3). Then for ρ̂ ∈ [−1, 1),
Z
1
lim
Z
σd (C(z; t)) −
v (t)
→0
−1
Z
=
Sd
Sd
|p(z, ρ̂) − p̂(ρ̂)|2 dσd (z).
N −1
2
1 X
1C(z;t) (xk ) dσd (z) dt
N
k=0
He, Basu, Zhao & Owen/Stolarsky invariance for permutations
28
Proof. Substituting v we get
Z 1
Z
1
2 + 1(ρ̂ 6 t 6 ρ̂ + 1 )
(p̂(t) − p(z, t))2 dσd (z) dt
d
1
−1
S
Z
Z
1 ρ̂+1
(p̂(t) − p(z, t))2 dσd (z) dt, as 2 → 0+
→
1 ρ̂
Sd
Z
→
(p̂(ρ̂) − p(z, ρ̂))2 dσd (z), as 1 → 0+ .
Sd
Lemma 5. Let v be as in (3.3) with ρ̂ ∈ [−1, 1), and let Kv be given by (3.2).
Then for any x, x0 ∈ Sd ,
lim Kv (x, x0 ) = σd (C(x; ρ̂) ∩ C(x0 ; ρ̂)).
→0
Proof. The argument is essentially the same as for Lemma 4.
Lemma 6. Let v be as in (3.3) with ρ̂ ∈ [−1, 1), and let Kv be given by (3.2).
Then
Z Z
lim
Kv (x, y) dσd (x) dσd (y) = p̂1 (ρ̂)2 .
(11.1)
→0
Sd
Sd
Proof. For any x, y ∈ Sd , the kernel Kv (x, y) is nonnegative and upper bounded
by a constant. Therefore we can take our limit operations
inside the double inR
tegral over x and y. Now lim→0 Kv (x, y) = Sd 1C(z;ρ̂) (x)1C(z;ρ̂) (y) dσd (z).
Therefore the limit in (11.1) is
Z Z Z
1C(z;ρ̂) (x)1C(z;ρ̂) (y) dσd (z) dσd (y) dσd (x) = p̂1 (ρ̂)2
Sd
Sd
Sd
after changing the order of the integrals.
Theorem 3 Let x0 , x1 , . . . , xN ∈ Sd and ρ̂ ∈ [−1, 1]. Then
Z
Sd
|p(z, ρ̂) − p̂1 (ρ̂)|2 dσd (z) =
N −1 N −1
1 X X
σd (C(xk ; ρ̂) ∩ C(x` ; ρ̂)) − p̂1 (ρ̂)2 .
N2
k=0 l=0
Proof. Theorem 2 gives us an identity and applying Lemmas 4, 5 and 6 to both
sides of it establishes (3.4) for ρ ∈ [−1, 1). For ρ̂ = 1 we get the answer by
replacing v by 2 + (1/1 )11−1 6t61 in the lemmas. Replacing z by y and ρ̂ by
t above gives the version in the main body of the article.
11.2. Proof of Lemma 3 (Double inclusion for Model 2)
Proof. We split the proof Rinto four cases and prove them individually. Recall
that P2 (u1 , u2 , u3 , ρ̃, ρ̂) = Sd−1 1(hy, x1 i > ρ̂)1(hy, x2 i > ρ̂) dσd−1 (y ∗ ) where
p
y = ρ̃xc + 1 − ρ̃2 y ∗ .
He, Basu, Zhao & Owen/Stolarsky invariance for permutations
29
Case 1. x1 = x2 = xc , i.e., r1 = r2 = r3 = 0.
Z
P2 (1, 1, 1, ρ̃, ρ̂) =
1(hy, xc i > ρ̂)1(hy, xc i > ρ̂) dσd−1 (y ∗ ) = 1(ρ̃ > ρ̂).
Sd−1
Case 2. x1 = xc 6= x2 , i.e., r1 = 0, r2 > 0, r3 > 0.
Z
P2 (1, u2 , u2 , ρ̃, ρ̂) =
1(hy, xc i > ρ̂)1(hy, x2 i > ρ̂) dσd−1 (y ∗ )
d−1
S
Z
= 1(ρ̃ > ρ̂)
1(hy, x2 i > ρ̂) dσd−1 (y ∗ )
Sd−1
= 1(ρ̃ > ρ̂)P1 (u2 , ρ̃, ρ̂)
where the last step uses Lemma 2.
Case 3. x1 = x2 =
6 xc , i.e., r1 = r2 > 0 = r3 .
Z
P2 (u2 , u2 , 1, ρ̃, ρ̂) =
1(hy, x1 i > ρ̂)1(hy, x2 i > ρ̂) dσd−1 (y ∗ )
d−1
ZS
=
1(hy, x2 i > ρ̂) dσd−1 (y ∗ )
Sd−1
= P1 (u2 , ρ̃, ρ̂).
Case 4. x1 6= x2 6= xc 6= x1 , i.e., r1 , r2 , r3 > 0. We split this case into
subcases. First we assume u2 = −1, so
Z
P2 (u1 , u2 , u3 , ρ̃, ρ̂) =
1(hy, x1 i > ρ̂)1(hy, −xc i > ρ̂) dσd−1 (y ∗ )
d−1
S
Z
= 1(−ρ̃ > ρ̂)
1(hy, x1 i > ρ̂) dσd−1 (y ∗ )
Sd−1
= 1(−ρ̃ > ρ̂)P1 (u1 , ρ̃, ρ̂).
Similarly if u1 = −1, then
P2 (u1 , u2 , u3 , ρ̃, ρ̂) = 1(−ρ̃ > ρ̂)P1 (u2 , ρ̃, ρ̂).
Finally we assume u1 > −1 and u2q> −1, so now |u1 | < 1 and |u2 | <
1. Recall the projections xj = uj cc + 1 − u2j x∗j for j = 1, 2 and introduce
√
further p
projections of y ∗ and x∗2 onto x∗1 : y ∗ = tx∗1 + 1 − t2 y ∗∗ and x∗2 =
∗∗
d
u∗3 x∗1 + 1 − u∗3 x∗∗
and x∗∗
2 belong to a subset of S that is
2 . The residuals y
He, Basu, Zhao & Owen/Stolarsky invariance for permutations
30
isomorphic to Sd−2 . Now we have
P2 (u1 , u2 , u3 , ρ̃, ρ̂)
Z
=
1(hy, x1 i > ρ̂)1(hy, x2 i > ρ̂) dσd−1 (y ∗ )
Sd−1
1
Z
=
Z
q
p
d−1
ωd−2
1 ρ̃u1 + 1 − ρ̃2 1 − u21 t > ρ̂
(1 − t2 ) 2 −1
−1 ωd−1
Sd−2
q
q
p
p
∗∗
∗∗
× 1 ρ̃u2 + 1 − ρ̃2 1 − u22 (tu∗3 + 1 − t2 1 − u∗2
hy
,
x
i)
>
ρ̂
2
3
× dσd−1 (y ∗∗ ) dt
=
1
d−1
ωd−2
ρ̂ − ρ̃u1
p
(1 − t2 ) 2 −1 1 t > p
1 − ρ̃2 1 − u21
−1 ωd−1
Z
q
q
p
p
∗∗
∗∗
×
1 ρ̃u2 + 1 − ρ̃2 1 − u22 (tu∗3 + 1 − t2 1 − u∗2
3 hy , x2 i) > ρ̂
Z
Sd−2
× dσd−1 (y ∗∗ ) dt
1(ρ̃u > ρ̂)1(ρ̃u2 > ρ̂),
R 1 ω1
d−1
d−2
(1 − t2 ) 2 −1 1(t > ρ1 )1(tu∗3 > ρ2 ) dt,
=
−1 ωd−1
R
d−1
1 ωd−2
−1
(1 − t2 ) 2 −1 1(t > ρ1 )σd−2 (C(x∗∗
2 , √
ω
ρ̃ = ±1
ρ̃ 6= ±1, u∗3 = ±1
ρ2 −tu∗
3
1−t2
d−1
√
1−u∗2
3
)) dt,
ρ̃ 6= ±1, |u∗3 | < 1
where u∗3 , ρ1 , ρ2 are defined in (4.7). Hence, the result follows.
11.3. Proof of Theorem 6 (Second moment under reference
distribution 2)
Proof. Without loss of generality we relabel the values xk so that c = 0. Any
other choice for c is reflected in the number ρe. The second moment is
E(p(y, ρ̂)2 ) =
N −1 N −1
1 X X
P2 (uk , u` , uk,` , ρ̃, ρ̂)
N2
(11.2)
k=0 l=0
where uk,` is obtained via (2.1) from the swap distance rk,` between points xk
and x` . We will partition the sum in (11.2) into the same four cases as in the
proof of Lemma 3.
Case 1, xk = x` = xc , i.e., rk = r` = rk,` = 0. There is only one pair
of (xk , x` ) for this condition. Hence, we get only one term corresponding to
P2 (1, 1, 1, ρ̃, ρ̂) = 1(ρ̃ > ρ̂).
Case 2, xk = xc 6= x` , i.e., rk = 0, r` = rk,` > 0. Consider all pairs of
(xk , x` ) that satisfy this condition and let K2 denote their total contribution
He, Basu, Zhao & Owen/Stolarsky invariance for permutations
31
to (11.2). Then
K2 = 2
N
−1 Z
X
l=1
=2
1(hy, xc i > ρ̂)1(hy, x` i > ρ̂) dσd−1 (y ∗ )
Sd−1
m
X
m0
m1
r
r=1
r
P2 (1, u(r), u(r), ρ̃, ρ̂).
Case 3, xk = x` 6= xc , i.e., rk = r` > 0 = rk,` . The contribution from terms
of this form is
K3 =
N
−1 Z
X
1(hy, xk i > ρ̂) dσd−1 (y ∗ ) =
Sd−1
k=1
m
X
m0
m1
r
r=1
r
P1 (u(r), ρ̃, ρ̂).
Case 4, xk 6= x` 6= xc , i.e., rk , r` , rk,` > 0. The contribution of these cases
to the sum is
K4 =
N
−1 N
−1
X
X
Z
Sd−1
k=1 `=1
=
1(hy, xi i > ρ̂)1(hy, xj i > ρ̂) dσd−1 (y ∗ )
1(` 6= k)
X X
X
c(rk , r` , rk,` )P2 (u1 , u2 , u3 , ρ̃, ρ̂).
rk ∈R r` ∈R rk,` ∈R3 (r)
Then the second moment is (1(ρ̃ > ρ̂) + K2 + K3 + K4 )/N 2 .
11.4. Proof of Theorem 7 (Location weighted invariance)
Proof. We follow the technique in Brauchart and Dick (2013). We begin by
showing that Kv,h,x0 as defined in (5.2) is a reproducing kernel. First, Kv,h,x0
is symmetric: Kv,h,x0 (x, y) = Kv,h,x0 (y, x). Next, choose a0 , . . . , aN −1 ∈ R and
NP
−1
x0 , . . . , xN −1 ∈ Sd . Then
ak a` Kv,h,x0 (xk , x` ) equals
k,`=0
Z
1
−1
Z
1
Z
ak a` v(t)h(hz, x0 i)1C(z;t) (xk )1C(z;t) (x` ) dσd (z) dt
Sd k,`=0
Z
=
−1
N
−1
X
Sd
v(t)h(hz, x0 i)
N
−1
X
2
ak 1C(z,t) (xk ) dσd (z) dt
k=0
which is nonnegative. Thus Kv,h,x0 is symmetric and positive definite, and so
by Aronszajn (1950), Kv,h,x0 is a reproducing kernel.
Aronszajn (1950) also shows that a reproducing kernel uniquely defines a
Hilbert space of functions with a specific inner product. Let Hv,h,x0 = H(Kv,h,x0 , Sd )
denote the corresponding reproducing kernel Hilbert space of functions f : Sd →
R with reproducing kernel Kv,h,x0 .
He, Basu, Zhao & Owen/Stolarsky invariance for permutations
32
We now consider functions f1 , f2 : Sd → R which admit the representation
Z 1Z
gi (z; t)1C(z;t) (x) dσd (z) dt, i = 1, 2
(11.3)
fi (x) =
Sd
−1
for functions gi ∈ L2 (Sd ×[−1, 1]). For any fixed y ∈ Sd the function Kv,h,x0 (·, y)
has representation (11.3) via g(z; t) = v(t)h(hz, x0 i)1C(z,t) (y).
For functions with representation (11.3), we define an inner product by
Z
hf1 , f2 iKv,h,x0 =
1
−1
1
v(t)
Z
Sd
1
g1 (z, t)g2 (z, t) dσd (z) dt.
h(hz, x0 i)
(11.4)
For y ∈ Sd and f1 ∈ Hv,h,x0 ,
Z
hf1 , Kv,h,x0 (·, y)iK
v,h,x0
1
Z
1
g1 (z; t)v(t)
=
h(hz, x0 i)1C(z;t) (y) dσd (z) dt
0
−1 v(t) Sd h(hz, x i)
Z 1Z
=
g1 (z, t)1C(z,t) (y) dσd (z) dt
−1
Sd
= f1 (y),
showing that the inner product (11.4) has the reproducing property. By Aronszajn (1950), the inner product in Hv,h,x0 is unique. Functions fi satisfying
(11.3) with hfi , fi iKv,h,x0 < ∞ are in Hv,h,x0 , and (11.4) is the unique inner
product of Hv,h,x0 .
We prove the theorem by equating two different forms of kR(Hv,h,x0 ; · )kKv,h,x0
where
Z
R(Hv,h,x0 ; · ) =
Kv,h,x0 (· , y) dσd (y) −
Sd
N −1
1 X
Kv,h,x0 (· , xk ).
N
k=0
Although R(Hv,h,x0 ; · ) depends on our specific points xi we omit that from the
notation. The reproducing property of Kv,h,x0 yields
hKv,h,x0 (· , xk ), Kv,h,x0 (· , x` )iK
v,h,x0
from which it follows that
Z
Z
0
Kv,h,x (· , y) dσd (y),
Sd
Z
K
v,h,x0
(· , y ) dσd (y )
0
Sd
Z
=
0
Sd
0
Kv,h,x0
0
Kv,h,x0 (y, y ) dσd (y) dσd (y ).
Sd
= Kv,h,x0 (xk , x` )
(11.5)
He, Basu, Zhao & Owen/Stolarsky invariance for permutations
33
Using (11.5) and the linearity of the inner product, we have
hR(Hv,h,x0 ; · ), R(Hv,h,x0 ; · )iK
v,h,x0
Z Z
N −1 Z
2 X
0
0
=
Kv,h,x0 (y, y ) dσd (y) dσd (y ) −
Kv,h,x0 (y, xk ) dσd (y)
N
Sd Sd
Sd
k=0
+
1
N2
N
−1
X
Kv,h,x0 (xk , x` ).
k,`=0
(11.6)
For our second form of kR(Hv,h,x0 ; · )kKv,h,x0 , we write
R(Hv,h,x0 ; · )
Z
N −1
1 X
0
Kv,h,x0 (· , xk )
=
Kv,h,x (· , y) dσd (y) −
N
Sd
k=0
Z
Z 1
Z
N −1
1 X
=
v(t)
1C(z;t) (x)h(hz, xi)
1C(z,t) (y) dσd (y) dt −
1C(z,t) (xk ) dσd (z) dt
N
−1
Sd
Sd
k=0
Z 1
Z
N
−1
1 X
=
v(t)
1C(z,t) (x)h(hz, xi) σd (C(z, t)) −
1C(z,t) (xk ) dσd (z) dt.
N
−1
Sd
k=0
Hence using the definition of the inner product h·, ·iKv,h,x0 , we have
hR(Hv,h,x0 ; x), R(Hv,h,x0 ; x)iK
v,h,x0
Z 1
Z
N −1
2
(11.7)
1 X
1C(x;t) (xk ) dσd (x) dt.
=
v(t)
h(hz, xi) σd (C(x, t)) −
N
−1
Sd
k=0
Combining equations (11.6) and (11.7), we have the generalized location-weighted
version of the Stolarsky invariance principle.
11.5. Proof of Theorem 8 (Spatially weighed invariance)
As in Section 11.1, lim→0 means lim1 →0+ lim2 →0+ and similarly limη→0 denotes limη1 →0+ limη2 →0+ . We prove a series of lemmas first.
Lemma 7. For v (·) and hη (·) defined by equations (3.3) and (5.3),
N −1
2
1 X
1C(z;t) (xk ) dσd (z) dt
lim lim
v (t)
hη (hz, xc i) σd (C(z, t)) −
η→0 →0 −1
N
Sd
k=0
Z
p
∗
2
∗
2
=
|p(ρ̃xc + 1 − ρ̃ y , ρ̂) − p̂1 (ρ̂)| dσd−1 (y ),
Z
1
Z
Sd−1
where p̂1 (ρ̂) = σd (C(y; ρ̂)).
He, Basu, Zhao & Owen/Stolarsky invariance for permutations
34
Proof. This proof is similar to the others. First we take the limit → 0 yielding
Z
hη (hz, xc i) σd (C(z, ρ̂)) −
lim
η→0
Sd
N
2
1 X
1C(z;ρ̂) (xk ) dσd (z).
N
k=1
√
Making the projection z = sxc + 1 − s2 z ∗ gives
Z 1Z
ωd−1
lim
(1 − s2 )d/2−1 hη (s) ×
η→0 −1 Sd−1 ωd
σd (C(sxc +
p
1 − s2 z ∗ , ρ̂)) −
N
2
1 X
1C(sxc +√1−s2 z∗ ;ρ̂) (xk ) dσd−1 (z ∗ ) ds
N
k=1
Z
p
|p(ρ̂xc + 1 − ρ̂2 y ∗ , ρ̂) − p̂1 (ρ̂)|2 dσd−1 (y ∗ ).
=
Sd−1
Lemma 8. For v (·) and hη (·) defined by equations (3.3) and (5.3) ,
N −1
1 X
Kv ,hη ,xc (xk , x` )
η→0 →0 N 2
lim lim
k,`=0
=
1
N2
N
−1
X
Z
k,`=0
1(hy, xk i > ρ̂)1(hy, x` i > ρ̂) dσd−1 (y ∗ ).
Sd−1
Proof. First, limη→0 lim→0 N −2
NP
−1
Kv ,hη ,xc (xk , x` ) equals
k,`=0
Z
N −1
1 X
lim
hη (hz, xc i)1C(z;ρ̂) (xk )1C(z;ρ̂) (x` ) dσd (z).
η→0 Sd
N2
k,`=0
Projecting z onto xc yields z = sxc +
√
1 − s2 y ∗ and then we have
Z 1
Z
N −1
1 X
ωd−1
2 d/2−1
lim
(1
−
s
)
h
(s)
1C(z;ρ̂) (xk )1C(z;ρ̂) (x` ) dσd−1 (y ∗ )
η
η→0 −1 ωd
N2
d−1
S
k,`=0
N −1 Z
1 X
= 2
1(hy, xk i > ρ̂)1(hy, x` i > ρ̂) dσd−1 (y ∗ ).
N
Sd−1
k,`=0
Lemma 9. For v (·) and hη (·) defined by equations (3.3) and (5.3),
Z Z
lim lim
Kv ,hη ,xc (x, y) dσd (x) dσd (y) = p̂1 (ρ̂)2
η→0 →0
Sd
Sd
Proof. Because Kv ,hη ,xc is nonnegative and uniformly bounded we may take
the limit over inside the integrals. Now
Z
lim Kv ,hη ,xc (x, y) =
hη (hz, xc i)1C(z;ρ̂) (x)1C(z;ρ̂) (y) dσd (z),
→0
Sd
He, Basu, Zhao & Owen/Stolarsky invariance for permutations
35
and the limit becomes
Z Z Z
lim
hη (hz, xc i)1C(z;ρ̂) (x)1C(z;ρ̂) (y) dσd (z) dσd (x) dσd (y).
η→0
Sd
Sd
Sd
Integrating over z last we get limη→0
R
Sd
hη (hz, xc i)p̂21 (ρ̂) dz = p̂21 (ρ̂).
Lemma 10. Under reference distribution 2
N −1 Z
2 X
lim lim
Kv ,hη ,xc (x, xk ) dσd (x) = 2p̂1 (ρ̂)E(p(y, ρ̂)).
η→0 →0 N
Sd
k=0
Proof. The argument here is similar to the one used for Lemma 9. Take the
limit over inside the integral and change the order of integration to yield
Z
lim 2p̂1 (ρ̂)
η→0
Sd
N −1
1 X
hη (hz, xc i)1C(z,ρ̂) (xk ) dσd (z).
N
k=0
Substituting the projection z = txc +
Z
1
lim 2p̂1 (ρ̂)
η→0
−1
Z
= 2p̂1 (ρ̂)
Sd−1
√
ωd−1
(1 − t2 )d/2−1 hη (t)
ωd
1
N
N
−1
X
1 − t2 z ∗ produces
Z
Sd−1
N −1
1 X
1C(txc +√1−t2 z∗ ,ρ̂) (xk ) dσd−1 (z ∗ ) dt
N
k=0
1C(ρ̃x +√1−ρ̃2 z∗ ,ρ̂) (xk ) dσd−1 (z ∗ )
c
k=0
= 2p̂1 (ρ̂)E(p(y, ρ̂))
for y under Model 2.
Proof of Theorem 8
Proof. The proof follows from using Lemmas 7 to 10 and Theorem 7.
| 10math.ST
|
Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. aanda
February 1, 2018
c ESO 2018
Enhancing SDO/HMI images using deep learning
C. J. Díaz Baso1, 2 and A. Asensio Ramos1, 2
1
2
Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, C/Vía Láctea s/n, E-38205 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
Departamento de Astrofísica, Universidad de La Laguna, E-38206 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
ABSTRACT
arXiv:1706.02933v2 [astro-ph.SR] 30 Jan 2018
Context. The Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) provides continuum images and magnetograms with a cadence better than
one every minute. It has been continuously observing the Sun 24 hours a day for the past 7 years. The trade-off between full disk
observations and spatial resolution makes that HMI is not enough to analyze the smallest-scale events in the solar atmosphere.
Aims. Our aim is developing a new method to enhance HMI data, simultaneously deconvolving and superresolving images and
magnetograms. The resulting images will mimick observations with a diffraction-limited telescope twice the diameter of HMI.
Methods. The method, that we term Enhance, is based on two deep fully convolutional neural networks that input patches of
HMI observations and output deconvolved and superresolved data. The neural networks are trained on synthetic data obtained from
simulations of the emergence of solar active regions.
Results. We have obtained deconvolved and supperresolved HMI images. To solve this ill-defined problem with infinite solutions we
have used a neural network approach to add prior information from the simulations. We test Enhance against Hinode data that has
been degraded to a 28 cm diameter telescope showing very good consistency. The code is open sourced for the community.
Key words. Techniques: image processing, Sun: magnetic fields, Methods: data analysis
1. Introduction
Astronomical observations from Earth are always limited by the
presence of the atmosphere, which strongly disturbs the images.
An obvious (but expensive) solution to this problem is to place
the telescopes in space, which produces observations without any
(or limited) atmospheric aberrations. Although the observations
obtained from space are not affected by atmospheric seeing, the
optical properties of the instrument still limits the observations.
In the case of near-diffraction limited observations, the point
spread function (PSF) establishes the maximum allowed spatial
resolution. The PSF typically contains two different contributions.
The central core is usually dominated by the Airy diffraction
pattern, a consequence of the finite and circular aperture of the
telescope (plus other perturbations on the pupil of the telescope
like the spiders used to keep the secondary mirror in place). The
tails of the PSF are usually dominated by uncontrolled sources of
dispersed light inside the instrument, the so-called stray light. It
is known that the central core limits the spatial resolution of the
observations (the smallest feature that one can see in the image),
while the tails reduce the contrast of the image (Danilovic et al.
2010). Moreover, it is important to note that knowing the PSF
of any instrument is a very complicated task (Yeo et al. 2014;
Couvidat et al. 2016).
If the PSF is known with some precision, it is possible to apply
deconvolution techniques to partially remove the perturbing effect
of the telescope. The deconvolution is usually carried out with the
Richardson-Lucy algorithm (RL; Richardson 1972), an iterative
procedure that returns a maximum-likelihood solution to the
problem. Single image deconvolution is usually a very ill-defined
problem, in which a potentially infinite number of solutions can
be compatible with the observations. Consequently, some kind
of regularization has to be imposed. Typically, an early-stopping
strategy in the iterative process of the RL algorithm leads to a
decent output, damping the high spatial frequencies that appear
in any deconvolution process. However, a maximum a-posteriori
approach in which some prior information about the image is
introduced gives much better results.
Fortunately, spectroscopic and spectropolarimetric observations provide multi-image observations of a field-of-view (FOV)
and the deconvolution process is much better defined. This deconvolution process has been tried recently with great success
by van Noort (2012), who also introduced a strong regularization
by assuming that the Stokes profiles in every pixel have to be explained with the emerging Stokes profiles from a relatively simple
model atmosphere assuming local thermodynamical equilibrium.
Another solution was provided by Ruiz Cobo & Asensio Ramos
(2013), who assumed that the matrix built with the Stokes profiles
for all observed pixels has very low rank. In other words, it means
that the Stokes profiles on the FOV can be linearly expanded
with a reduced set of vectors. This method was later exploited
by Quintero Noda et al. (2015) with good results. Another different approach was developed by Asensio Ramos & de la Cruz
Rodríguez (2015) where they used the concept of sparsity (or
compressibility), which means that one can linearly expand the
unknown quantities in a basis set with only a few of the elements
of the basis set being active. Under the assumption of sparsity,
they exploited the presence of spatial correlation on the maps
of physical parameters, carrying out successful inversions and
deconvolution simultaneously.
A great science case for the application of deconvolution
and superresolution techniques is the Helioseismic and Magnetic
Imager (HMI; Scherrer et al. 2012) onboard the Solar Dynamics
Observatory (SDO; Pesnell et al. 2012). HMI is a space-borne
observatory that deploys full-disk images (plus a magnetogram
and dopplergram) of the Sun every 45 s (or every 720 s for a better
signal-to-noise ratio). The spatial resolution of these images is
∼ 1.100 , with a sampling of ∼ 0.500 /pix. In spite of the enormous
advantage of having such a synoptic spatial telescope without
Article number, page 1 of 14
A&A proofs: manuscript no. aanda
the problematic earth’s atmosphere, the spatial resolution is not
enough to track many of the small-scale solar structures of interest.
The main reason of that is the sacrifice that HMI does to cover the
full disk of the Sun encapsulating that FOV on a feasible sensor.
We think that, in the process of pushing for the science advance,
one would desirably prefer images with a better spatial resolution
and compensated for the telescope PSF.
Under the assumption of the linear theory of image formation, and writing images in lexicographic order (so that they are
assumed to be sampled at a given resolution), the observed image
can be written as:
I = D[P ∗ O] + N,
(1)
where O is the solar image at the entrance of the telescope, P
is a convolution matrix that simulates the effect of the PSF on
the image, D is a sub-sampling (non-square) matrix that reduces
the resolution of the input image to the desired output spatial
resolution and N represents noise (usually with Gaussian or
Poisson statistics). The solution to the single-image deconvolution+superresolution problem (SR; Borman & Stevenson 1998)
requires the recovery of O (a high-resolution image of 2N × 2N
pixels) from a single measurement I (a low-resolution image of
N × N pixels). This problem is extremely ill-posed, even worse
than the usual deconvolution to correct from the effect of the PSF.
A multiplicity (potentially an infinite number) of solutions exists.
This problem is then typically solved by imposing strong priors
on the image (e.g., Tipping & Bishop 2003).
Despite the difficulty of the problem, we think there is great
interest in enhancing the HMI images using post-facto techniques.
A super-resolved image could help detect or characterize small
features in the surface of the Sun, or improve the estimation of
the total magnetic flux limited by the resolution in the case of
magnetograms. This motivated us to develop an end-to-end fast
method based on a deep fully convolutional neural network that
simultaneously deconvolve and superresolve by a factor of 2 the
HMI continuum images and magnetograms. We have preferred to
be conservative and only do superresolution by a factor 2 because
our tests with a larger factor did not produced satisfactory results.
Deep learning single-image deconvolution and superresolution
has been recently applied with great success in natural images (Xu
et al. 2014; Dong et al. 2015, 2016; Shi et al. 2016; Ledig et al.
2016; Hayat 2017). Given the variability of all possible natural
images, a training-based approach should give much better results
in our case than in the case of natural images. In the following,
we give details about the architecture and training of the neural
network and provide examples of applications to HMI data.
The output oi is then input in another neuron that does a similar
work.
An ANN can be understood as a pipeline where the information goes from the input to the output, where each neuron makes
a transformation like the one described above (see left panel of
Fig. 1). Given that neurons are usually grouped in layers, the term
deep neural network comes from the large number of layers that
are used to build the neural network. Some of the most successful
and recent neural networks contain several millions of neurons
organized in several tens or hundreds of layers (Simonyan &
Zisserman 2014). As a consequence, deep neural networks can
be considered to be a very complex composition of very simple
nonlinear functions, which gives the capacity to do very complex
transformations.
The most used type of neural network from the 1980s to the
2000s is the fully connected network (FCN; see Schmidhuber
2014, for an overview), in which every input is connected to every
neuron of the following layer. Likewise, the output transformation
becomes the input of the following layer (see left panel of Fig.
1). This kind of architecture succeeded to solve problems that
were considered to be not easily solvable as the recognition of
handwritten characters (Bishop 1996). A selection of applications
in Solar Physics include the inversion of Stokes profiles (e.g.,
Socas-Navarro 2005; Carroll & Kopf 2008), the acceleration of
the solution of chemical equilibrium (Asensio Ramos & SocasNavarro 2005) and the automatic classification of sunspot groups
(Colak & Qahwaji 2008).
Neural networks are optimized iteratively by updating the
weights and biases so that a loss function that measures the ability
of the network to predict the output from the input is minimized1 .
This optimization is widely known as learning or training process.
In this process a training dataset is required.
2.2. Convolutional neural networks
In spite of the relative success of neural networks, their application to high-dimensional objects like images or videos turned out
to be an obstacle. The fundamental reason was that the number
of weights in a fully connected network increases extremely fast
with the complexity of the network (number of neurons) and the
computation quickly becomes unfeasible. As each neuron has to
be connected with the whole input, if we add a new neuron we
will add the size of the input in number of weights. Then, a larger
number of neurons implies a huge number of connections. This
constituted an apparently unsurmountable handicap that was only
solved with the appearance of convolution neural networks (CNN
or ConvNets; LeCun & Bengio 1998).
2. Deep Convolutional Neural Network
The most important ingredient in the CNN is the convolutional
layer which is composed of several convolutional neurons.
2.1. Deep neural networks
Each CNN-neuron carries out the convolution of the input with
Artificial neural networks (ANN) are well-known computing a certain (typically small) kernel, providing as output what is
systems based on connectionism that can be considered to be known as feature map. Similar to a FCN, the output of convovery powerful approximants to arbitrary functions (Bishop 1996). lutional neurons is often passed through a nonlinear activation
They are constructed by putting together many basic fundamental function. The fundamental advantage of CNNs is that the same
structures (called neurons) and connecting them massively. Each weights are shared across the whole input, drastically reducing
neuron i is only able to carry out a very basic operation on the the number of unknowns. This also makes CNN shift invariant
input vector: it multiplies all the input values x j by some weights (features can be detected in an image irrespectively of where they
w j , adds some bias bi and finally returns the value of a certain are located).
user-defined nonlinear activation function f (x). In mathematical
notation, a neuron computes:
oi = f (Σ j x j · w j + bi ).
Article number, page 2 of 14
(2)
1
This is the case of supervised training. Unsupervised neural networks
are also widespread but are of no concern in this paper.
C. J. Díaz Baso and A. Asensio Ramos: Enhancing HMI images
Previous layer
(neurons or input)
Fully-connected
layer
height
width
depth
Fig. 1. Left panel: building block of a fully-connected neural network. Each input of the previous layer is connected to each neuron of the output.
Each connection is represent by different lines where the width is associated to higher weights and the dashed lines to negative weights. Right panel:
three-dimensional convolution carried out by a convolutional layer. The 3D-kernel traverses the whole input, producing a single scalar at each
position. At the end, a 2D feature map will be created for each 3D kernel. When all feature maps are stacked, a feature map tensor will be created.
In mathematical notation, for a two-dimensional input X of
size N × N with C channels2 (really a cube or tensor of size
N × N × C), each output feature map Oi (with size N × N × 1) of
a convolutional layer is computed as:
it, but it would require more training time (and data) to learn to
approximate that mode of operation (Peyrard et al. 2015).
Although a convolutional layer significantly decreases the
number of free parameters as compared with a fully-connected
layer, it introduces some hyperparameters (global characteristics
Oi = Ki ∗ X + bi ,
(3) of the network) to be set in advance: the number of kernels to
be used (number of feature maps to extract from the input), size
where Ki is the K × K ×C kernel tensor associated with the output of each kernel with its corresponding padding (to deal with the
feature map i, bi is a bias value (1 × 1 × 1) and the convolution borders of the image) and stride (step to be used during the
is displayed with the symbol ∗. Once the convolution with M convolution operation) and the number of convolutional layers
different kernels is carried out and stacked together, the output and specific architecture to use in the network. As a general rule,
O will have size N × N × M. All convolutions are here indeed the deeper the CNN, the better the result, at the expense of a more
intrinsically three dimensional, but one could see them as the difficult and computationally intensive training. CNNs have been
total of M × C two dimensional convolutions plus the bias (see used recently in astrophysics for denoising images of galaxies
right panel of Fig. 1).
(Schawinski et al. 2017), for cosmic string detection in CMB
CNNs are typically composed of several layers. This layer- temperature maps (Ciuca et al. 2017), or for the estimation of
wise architecture exploits the property that many natural signals horizontal velocities in the solar surface (Asensio Ramos et al.
are a generated by a hierarchical composition of patterns. For 2017) .
instance, faces are composed of eyes, while eyes contain a similar
internal structure. This way, one can devise specific kernels that
extract this information from the input. As an example, Fig. 2 2.3. Activation layers
shows the effect of a vertical border detection kernel on a real
As said, the output of a convolutional layer is often passed
solar image. The result at the right of the figure is the feature
through a non-linear function that is termed the activation funcmap. CNNs work on the idea that each convolution layer extracts
tion. Since the convolution operation is linear, this activation is
information about certain patterns, which is done during the trainthe one that introduces the non-linear character of the CNNs.
ing by iteratively adapting the set of convolutional kernels to the
Although hyperbolic tangent, f (x) = tanh(x), or sigmoidal,
specific features to locate. This obviously leads to a much more
f (x) = [1 + exp(−x)]−1 , activation units were originally used
optimal solution as compared with hand-crafted kernels. Despite
in ANNs, nowadays a panoply of more convenient nonlinearities
the exponentially smaller number of free parameters as compared
are used. The main problem with any sigmoid-type activation
with a fully-connected ANN, CNNs produce much better results.
function is that its gradient vanishes for very large values, diffiIt is interesting to note that, since a convolutional layer just comculting the training of the network. Probably the most common
putes sums and multiplications of the inputs, a multi-layer FCN
activation function is the rectified linear unit (ReLU; Nair & Hin(also known as perceptron) is perfectly capable of reproducing
ton 2010) or slight variations of it. The ReLU replaces all negative
2
values
in the input by zero and keeps the rest untouched. This
The term channels is inherited from the those of a color image (e.g.,
RGB channels). However, the term has a much more general scope and activation has the desirable property of producing non-vanishing
can be used for arbitrary quantities (see Asensio Ramos et al. 2017, for gradients for positive arguments, which greatly accelerates the
an application).
training.
Article number, page 3 of 14
A&A proofs: manuscript no. aanda
*
-1 0 1
-2 0 2
-1 0 1
=
Fig. 2. An example of a convolution with a filter. In this example a vertical border-locating kernel is convolved with the input image of the Sun. A
resulting feature map of size (N − 2) × (N − 2) is generated from the convolution.
2.4. General training process
during the update of the weights but used after each iteration as
validation. Desirably, the loss should decrease both in the training
CNNs are trained by iteratively modifying the weights and bi- and validation sets simultaneously. If overfitting occurs, the loss
ases of the convolutional layers (and any other possibly learnable in the validation set will increase.
parameter in the activation layer). The aim is to optimize a userMoreover, several techniques have been described in the litdefined loss function from the output of the network and the erature to accelerate the training of CNNs and also to improve
desired output of the training data. The optimization is routinely generalization. Batch normalization (Ioffe & Szegedy 2015) is a
solved using simple first-order gradient descent algorithms (GD; very convenient and easy-to-use technique that consistently prosee Rumelhart et al. 1988), which modifies the weights along the duces large accelerations in the training. It works by normalizing
negative gradient of the loss function with respect to the model every batch to have zero mean and unit variance. Mathematically,
parameters to carry out the update. The gradient of the loss func- the input is normalized so that:
tion with respect to the free parameters of the neural network is
obtained through the backpropagation algorithm (LeCun et al.
y = γ x̂i + β
1998). Given that neural networks are defined as a stack of mod- i
ules (or layers), the gradient of the loss function can be calculated x̂i = √xi − µ ,
(5)
using the chain rule as the product of the gradient of each module
σ2 +
and, ultimately, of the last layer and the specific loss function.
In practice, procedures based on the so-called stochastic gra- where µ and σ are the mean and standard deviation of the inputs
−3
dient descent (SGD) are used, in which only a few examples on the batch and = 10 is a small number to avoid underflow.
The
parameters
γ
and
β
are
learnable parameters that are modified
(termed batch) from the training set are used during each iteration to compute a noisy estimation of the gradient and adjust the during the training.
weights accordingly. Although the calculated gradient is a noisy
estimation of the one calculated with the whole training set, the 2.5. Our architecture
training is faster as we have less to compute and more reliable. If
the general loss function Q is the average of each loss Q j com- We describe in the following the specific architecture of the two
puted on a batch of inputs and it can be written as Q = Σnj Q j /n, deep neural networks used to deconvolve and superresolve continthe weights wi are updated following the same recipe as the gradi- uum images and magnetograms. It could potentially be possible
ent descend algorithm but calculating the gradient within a single to use a single network to deconvolve and superresolve both types
of images. However as each type of data has different well debatch:
fined properties (like the usual range of values, or the sign of the
wi+1 = wi − η∇Q(wi ) = wi − η∇Σnj Q j (wi )/n ' wi − η∇Q j (wi ), (4) magnitude) we have decided to use two different neural networks,
finding remarkable results. We refer to the set of two deep neural
where η is the so-called learning rate. It can be kept fixed or it networks as Enhance.
can be changed according to our requirements. This parameter
The deep neural networks used in this work are inspired by
has to be tuned to find a compromise between the accuracy of the DeepVel (Asensio Ramos et al. 2017), used to infer horizontal
network and the speed of convergence. If η is too large, the steps velocity fields in the solar photosphere. Figure 3 represents a
will be too large and the solution could potentially overshoot the schematic view of the architecture. It is made of the concatenation
minimum. On the contrary, if it is too small it will take so many of N residual blocks (He et al. 2015). Each one is composed of
iterations to reach the minimum. Adaptive methods like Adam several convolutional layers (two in our case) followed by batch
(Kingma & Ba 2014) have been developed to automatically tune normalizations and a ReLU layer for the first convolutional layer.
the learning rate.
The internal structure of a residual block is displayed in the
Because of the large number of free parameters in a deep blowup3 of Fig.3.
CNNs, overfitting can be a problem. One would like the network
to generalize well and avoid any type of "memorization" of the 3 We note that we use the non-standard implementation of a residual
training set. To check for that, a part of the training set is not used block where the second ReLU activation is removed from the reference
Article number, page 4 of 14
C. J. Díaz Baso and A. Asensio Ramos: Enhancing HMI images
Conv ReLU
Res
i
dual
Bl
oc
k
s
ConvBat
c
h
Up ConvReLU Conv
I
nput
Out
put
(
3x
3)
(
3x
3)
(
3x
3)
(
1x
1)
Fig. 3. Upper panel: architecture of the fully convolutional neural network used in this work. Colors refer to different types of layers, which are
indicated in the upper labels. The kernel size of convolutional layers are also indicated in the lower labels. Black layers are representing the input
and output layers. Lower panel: the inner structure of a residual block.
Following the typical scheme of a residual block, there is also
a shortcut connection between the input and the output of the
block (see more information in He et al. 2015; Asensio Ramos
et al. 2017), so that the input is added to the output. Very deep
networks usually saturate during training producing higher errors
than shallow networks because of difficulties during training (also
known as the degradation problem). The fundamental reason is
that the gradient of the loss function with respect to parameters
in early layers becomes exponentially small (also known as the
vanishing gradient problem). Residual networks help avoid this
problem obtaining state-of-the-art results without adding any
extra parameter and with practically the same computational
complexity. It is based on the idea that if y = F(x) represents
the desired effect of the block on the input x, it is much simpler
for a network to learn the deviations from the input (or residual
mapping) that it can called R(x) = y − x than the full map F(x),
so that y = F(x) = R(x) + x.
In our case, all convolutions are carried out with kernels of
size 3 × 3 and each convolutional layer uses 64 such kernels.
Additionally, as displayed in Fig. 3, we also impose another
shortcut connection between the input to the first residual block
and the batch normalization layer after the last residual block.
We have checked that this slightly increase the quality of the
prediction. Noting that a convolution of an N × N image with a
3 × 3 kernel reduces the size of the output to (N − 2) × (N − 2),
we augment the input image with 1 pixel in each side using a
reflection padding to compensate for this and maintain the size of
the input and output.
Because Enhance carries out ×2 superresolution, we need to
add an upsampling layer somewhere in the architecture (displayed
in violet in Fig. 3). One can find in the literature two main options
to do the upsampling. The first one involves upsampling the image
just after the input and let the rest of convolutional layers do the
work. The second involves doing the upsampling just before the
output. Following Dong et al. (2016), we prefer the second option
because it provides a much faster network, since the convolutions
are applied to smaller images. Moreover, to avoid artifacts in
the upsampling4 we have implemented a nearest-neighbor resize
followed by convolution instead of a more standard transpose
convolution.
The last layer that carries out a 1 × 1 convolution is of extreme
importance in our networks. Given that we use ReLU activation
layers throughout the network, it is only in this very last layer
where the output gets its sign using the weights associated to the
layer. This is of no importance for intensity images, but turns out
to be crucial for the signed magnetic field.
The number of free parameters of our CNN can be easily
obtained using the previous information. In the scheme of Fig. 3,
the first convolution layer generates 64 channels by applying 64
different kernels of size 3 × 3 × 1 to the input (a single-channel
image), using (3×3+1)×64 = 640 free parameters. The following
convolutional layers have again 64 kernel filters, but this time
each one of size (3 × 3 × 64 + 1), with a total of 36928 free
parameters. Finally, the last layer contains one kernel of size
1 × 1 × 64, that computes a weighted average along all channels.
architecture (He et al. 2015), which provides better results according to
https://github.com/gcr/torch-residual-networks
4
The checkerboard artifacts are nicely explained
https://distill.pub/2016/deconv-checkerboard/.
in
Article number, page 5 of 14
A&A proofs: manuscript no. aanda
HMI - Observation
100
600
60
Y [pixel]
Y [pixel]
80
40
400
200
20
0
Simulation - Original
800
0
20
40
60
X [pixel]
80
0
100
0
Simulation - Degraded
200
400
X [pixel]
800
Power Spectrum of the image
HMI
Original PSF
New PSF
100
105
80
104
60
P( )
Y [pixel]
600
40
103
20
0
102
0
20
40
60
X [pixel]
80
100
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
[pix 1]
0.4
0.5
Fig. 4. Upper left: HMI observation. Upper right: snapshot from the simulation used for training. Lower left: degraded simulations, which can be
compared with the HMI observations. Lower right: azimuthally averaged power spectrum of the HMI observations and the degraded simulations
with the original PSF and the one modified and used in the training process. The physical dimension of the three maps is 5400 ×5400 .
The total amount of free parameters in this layer is 65 (including
the bias).
between the solar structures in the simulation of Cheung et al.
(2010) and the real Sun.
The radiative MHD simulation was carried out with the MURaM
code (Vögler et al. 2005). The box spans 92 Mm × 49
2.6. Our training data and process
Mm in the two horizontal directions and 8.2 Mm in the vertical
A crucial ingredient for the success of an CNN is the generation direction (with horizontal and vertical grid spacing of 48 and 32
of a suitable training set of high quality. Our network is trained km, respectively). After ∼20 h of solar time, an active region is
using synthetic continuum images and synthetic magnetograms formed as a consequence of the buoyancy of an injected flux tube
from the simulation of the formation of a solar active region de- in the convection zone. An umbra, umbral dots, light bridges, and
scribed by Cheung et al. (2010). This simulation provides a large penumbral filaments are formed during the evolution. As comFOV with many solar-like structures (quiet Sun, plage, umbra, mented before, this constitutes a very nice dataset of simulated
penumbra, etc.) that visually resemble those in the real Sun. We images that look very similar to those on the Sun. Synthetic gray
note that if the network is trained properly and generalizes well, images are generated from the simulated snapshots (Cheung et al.
the network does not memorize what is in the training set. On the 2010) and magnetograms are obtained by just using the vertical
contrary, it applies what it learns to the new structures. Therefore, magnetic field component at optical depth unity at 5000 Å. A
we are not specially concerned by the potential lack of similarity total of 250 time steps are used in the training (slightly less for
Article number, page 6 of 14
C. J. Díaz Baso and A. Asensio Ramos: Enhancing HMI images
Y [pixel]
Y [pixel]
Y [pixel]
Synthetic - HMI
Y [pixel]
Y [pixel]
Synthetic - Target
40
80
80
30
60
60
20
40
40
10
20
20
40
80
80
30
60
60
20
40
40
10
20
20
40
80
80
30
60
60
20
40
40
10
20
20
0
Y [pixel]
Network
10
20
30
40
0
20
40
60
80
40
80
80
30
60
60
20
40
40
10
20
20
40
80
80
30
60
60
20
40
40
10
20
20
40
80
80
30
60
60
20
40
40
10
20
20
0
10
20 30
X [pixel]
40
0
20
40 60
X [pixel]
80
0
20
40
60
80
0
20
40 60
X [pixel]
80
Fig. 5. Results with the synthetic validation set. The upper three rows show results for the continuum images, while the lower three rows display
results for the magnetograms. All horizontal and vertical axes are in pixels.
Article number, page 7 of 14
A&A proofs: manuscript no. aanda
the magnetograms when the active region has already emerged to
the surface).
We note that the magnetograms of HMI in the Fe i 6173 Å
correspond to layers in the atmosphere around logτ = −1 (Bello
González et al. 2009), while our magnetograms are extracted
from logτ = 0, where τ is the optical depth at 5000 Å. In our
opinion this will not affect the results because the concentration
of the magnetic field is similar in terms of size and shape in both
atmospheric heights.
The synthetic images (and magnetograms) are then treated
to simulate a real HMI observation. All 250 frames of 1920 ×
1024 images are convolved with the HMI PSF (Wachter et al.
2012; Yeo et al. 2014; Couvidat et al. 2016) and resampled to
0.50400 /pixel. For simplicity, we have used the PSF described in
Wachter et al. (2012). The PSF functional form is azimuthally
symmetric and it is given by
"
" 2 #
r k #−1
r
+ 1+
,
(6)
PSF(r) = (1 − ) exp −
ω
W
which is a linear combination of a Gaussian and a Lorentzian.
Note that the radial distance is r = πDθ/λ, with D the telescope
diameter, λ the observing wavelength and θ the distance in the
focal plane in arcsec. The reference values for the parameters
(Wachter et al. 2012) are = 0.1, ω = 1.8, k = 3 and W = 3.
Figure 4 demonstrates the similarity between an HMI image
of the quiet Sun (upper left panel) and the simulations degraded
and downsampled (lower left panel). The simulation at the original resolution is displayed in the upper right panel. For clarity,
we display the horizontal and vertical axis in pixel units, instead
of physical units. This reveals the difference in spatial resolution,
both from the PSF convolution and the resampling. In this process we also realized that using the PSF of Wachter et al. (2012),
the azimuthally averaged power spectrum of the degraded simulated quiet Sun turns out to have stronger tails than those of the
observation. For this reason, we slightly modified it so that we
finally used ω = 2 and W = 3.4. The curve with these modified
values is displayed in orange as the new PSF in the Fig. 4 with
the original PSF and the default values in blue. For consistency,
we also applied this PSF to the magneto-convection simulations
described by Stein & Nordlund (2012) and Stein (2012), finding
a similar improvement in the comparison with observations.
One could argue that using the more elaborate PSFs of Yeo
et al. (2014) (obtained via observations of the Venus transit) or
Couvidat et al. (2016) (obtained with ground data before the
launch) is preferred. However, we point out that applying the
PSF of Wachter et al. (2012) (with some modifications that are
specified before) to the simulations produce images that compare
excellently at a quantitative level with the observations. Anyway,
given that our code is open sourced, anyone interested in using a
different PSF can easily retrain the deep networks.
Then, we randomly extract 50000 patches of 50 × 50 pixels
both spatially and temporally, which will constitute the input
patches of the training set. We also randomly extract a smaller
subset of 5000 patches which will act as a validation set to avoid
overfitting. These are used during the training to check that the
CNN generalizes well and is not memorizing the training set.
The targets of the training set are obtained similarly but convolving with the Airy function of a telescope twice the diameter of
HMI (28 cm), which gives a diffraction limit of 0.55”/pixel, and
then resampled to 0.25”/pixel. Therefore, the sizes of the output
patches are 100 × 100 pixels. All inputs and outputs for the continuum images are normalized to the average intensity of the quiet
Sun. This is very convenient when the network is deployed in
Article number, page 8 of 14
production because this quantity I/Ic is almost always available.
On the contrary, the magnetograms are divided by 103 , so they
are treated in kG during the training.
The training of the network is carried out by minimizing a
loss function defined as the squared difference between the output
of the network and the desired output defined on the training
set. To this end, we use the Adam stochastic optimizer (Kingma
& Ba 2014) with a learning rate of η = 10−4 . The training is
done in a Titan X GPU for 20 epochs, taking ∼ 500 seconds per
epoch. We augment the loss function with an `2 regularization for
the elements of the kernels of all convolutional layers to avoid
overfitting. Finally, we add Gaussian noise (with an amplitude
of 10−3 in units of the continuum intensity for the continuum
images and 10−2 for the magnetograms, following HMI standard
specifications5 ) to stabilize the training and produce better quality
predictions. This is important for regions of low contrast in the
continuum images and regions of weak magnetic fields in the
magnetograms.
Apart from the size and number of kernels, there are a few
additional hyperparameters that need to be defined in Enhance.
The most important ones are the number of residual blocks, the
learning rate of the Adam optimizer and the amount of regularization. We have found stable training behavior with a learning rate
of 10−4 so we have kept this fixed. Additionally, we found that a
regularization weight of 10−6 for the continuum images and 10−5
for the magnetograms provides nice and stable results.
Finally, five residual blocks with ∼450k free parameters provide predictions that are almost identical to those of 10 and 15
residual blocks but much faster. We note that the number of residual blocks can be further decreased even down to one and still
a good behavior is found (even if the number of kernels is decreased to 32). This version of Enhance is 6 times faster than the
one presented here, reducing the number of parameters to ∼40k,
with differences around 3%. Although Enhance is already very
fast, this simplified version can be used for an in-browser online
superresolution and deconvolution of HMI data.
3. Results
3.1. Validation with synthetic images
Before proceeding to applying the networks to real data, we show
in Fig. 5 the results with some of the patches from the validation
set which are not used during the training. The upper three rows
show results for the continuum images, while the lower three rows
show results for the magnetograms. The leftmost column is the
original synthetic image at the resolution of HMI. The rightmost
column is the target that should be recovered by the network,
which has doubled the number of pixels in each dimension. The
middle column displays our single-image superresolution results.
Even though the appearance of all small-scale details are not
exactly similar to the target, we consider that Enhance is doing
a very good job in deconvolving and superresolving the data in
the first column. In the regions of increased activity, we find that
we are able to greatly improve the fine structure, specially in the
penumbra. Many details are barely visible in the synthetic HMI
image but can be guessed. Of special relevance are the protrusions
in the umbra in the third row, which are very well recovered by
the neural network. The network also does a very good job in the
quiet Sun, correctly recovering the expected shape of the granules
from the blobby appearance in the HMI images.
5
http://hmi.stanford.edu/Description/HMI_Overview.pdf
C. J. Díaz Baso and A. Asensio Ramos: Enhancing HMI images
HMI - Original - c= 3.8%
Y [pixel]
200
175
175
150
150
125
125
100
100
75
75
50
50
25
25
0
0
25
Y [pixel]
75
100
125
150
175
200
Output Network - c= 7.7%
400
0
350
300
300
250
250
200
200
150
150
100
100
50
50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Hinode - Degraded - c= 3.9%
400
0
350
300
300
250
250
200
200
150
150
100
100
50
50
0
50
100
150
200 250
X [pixel]
300
25
350
400
0
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
350
400
350
400
Output Network - c= 6.7%
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Hinode - Degraded - c= 3.7%
400
350
0
0
400
350
0
Y [pixel]
50
HMI - Original - c= 3.7%
200
0
50
100
150
200 250
X [pixel]
300
Fig. 6. This figure shows the application of the neural network to real HMI images. From the upper to the lower part of each column: the original
HMI images, the output of the neural network and the degraded Hinode image. All the axis are in pixel units.
Article number, page 9 of 14
A&A proofs: manuscript no. aanda
Y [pixel]
Original
Original
350
350
300
300
250
250
200
200
150
150
100
100
50
50
Enhanced
0
0
50
100
150
200
X [pixel]
250
300
350
Enhanced
0
0
50
100
150
200
X [pixel]
250
300
350
Fig. 7. This figure show a example our neural network applied to the intensity (left) and magnetogram (right) for the same region. The FOV is
divided in two halfs. The upper half shows the HMI original image, without applying the neural network. The lower half shows enhanced image
applying the neural network to the last image. The original image was resampled to have the same scale of the network output.
The contrast σI /I, calculated as the standard deviation of
the continuum intensity divided by the average intensity of the
The trained networks are then applied to real HMI data. In order area, is quoted in the title of each panel and has been obtained
to validate the output of our neural network we have selected in a small region of the image displaying only granulation. The
observations of the Broadband Filter Instrument (BFI) from the granulation contrast increases from ∼ 3.7% to ∼7% (as Couvidat
Solar Optical Telescope (SOT Ichimoto et al. 2008; Tsuneta et al. et al. 2016), almost a factor 2 larger than the one provided by
2008) onboard Hinode (Kosugi et al. 2007). The pixel size of degraded Hinode. Note that the contrast may be slightly off for
the BFI is 0.109” and the selected observations were obtained in the right column because of the small quiet Sun area available.
the red continuum filter at 6684 ± 2 Å, which is the one closer The granulation contrast measured in Hinode without degradation
to the observing wavelength of HMI. To properly compare our is around 7%. After the resampling, it goes down to the values
results with Hinode, we have convolved the BFI images with an quoted in the figure. We note that (Danilovic et al. 2008) analyzed
Airy function of a telescope of 28 cm diameter and resampled to the Hinode granulation contrast at 630 nm and concluded that
0.25”/pixel to match those of the output of Enhance. The Hinode it is consistent with those predicted by the simulations (in the
images have not been deconvolved from the influence of its PSF. range 14−15%) once the PSF is taken into account. Just from the
We point out that the long tails of the PSF of the Hinode/SOT visual point of view, it is clear that Enhance produces small-scale
instrument produces a slight decrease of the contrast (Danilovic structures that are almost absent in the HMI images but clearly
et al. 2010) and this is the reason why our enhanced images have present in the Hinode images. Additionally, the deconvolved and
a larger contrast.
superresolved umbra intensity decreases between 3 and 7% when
compared to the original HMI umbral intensity.
Interesting cases are the large light bridge in the images of
3.2.1. Continuum images
the right column, that increases in spatial complexity. Another
Figure 6 displays this comparison for two different regions examples are the regions around the light bridge, that are plagued
(columns) observed simultaneously with Hinode and HMI. These with small weak umbral dots that are evident in Hinode data but
two active regions are: NOAA 11330 (N09, E04) observed on completely smeared out in HMI. For instance, the region conOctober 27, 2011 (first column) and NOAA 12192 (S14, E05) necting the light bridge at (125, 240) with the penumbra. Another
observed on October 22, 2014 (second column). We have used similar instance of this enhancement occurs (375, 190), a pore
HMI images with a cadence of 45 seconds, which is the worst with some umbral dots that are almost absent in the HMI images.
scenario in terms of noise in the image. The upper rows show
As a caveat, we warn the users that the predictions of the neuthe original HMI images. The lower rows display the degraded ral network in areas close to the limb is poorer than those at disk
Hinode images, while the central row shows the output of our center. Given that Enhance was trained with images close to disk
neural network. Given the fully convolutional character of the center, one could be tempted to think that a lack of generalization
deep neural network used in this work, it can be applied seam- is the cause for the failure. However, we note that structures seen
lessly to input images of arbitrary size. As an example, an image in the limb like elongated granules share some similarity to some
of size 400 × 400 can be superresolved and deconvolved in ∼100 penumbral filaments, so these cases are already present in the
ms using a Titan X GPU, or ∼1 s using a 3.4 GHz Intel Core i7. training set. The fundamental reason for the failure is that the
3.2. In the wild
Article number, page 10 of 14
C. J. Díaz Baso and A. Asensio Ramos: Enhancing HMI images
Power Spectrum of the image
108
Blos - Original
Blos - Enhanced
Blos - RL
Noise = 12G
Noise = 75G
107
1.5
106
1.0
P( )
Enhanced |Blos| [kG]
2.0
105
104
103
0.5
102
0.0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Original |Blos| [kG]
101
2.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
[pix 1]
0.4
0.5
Fig. 8. Left: scatter plot between the original magnetogram signal and the deconvolved magnetogram signal. Dotted lines indicate a change of a
factor 2. Right: spatial Fourier power spectrum of all considered magnetograms: the original, the output of Enhance and the one deconvolved with
RL. We also show the power spectrum of white noise at two different levels.
spatial contrast in the limb is very small so the neural network
does not know how to reconstruct the structures, thus creating
artifacts. We speculate that these artifacts will not be significantly
reduced even if limb synthetic observations are included in the
training set.
3.2.2. A magnetogram example: AR 11158
As a final example, we show in Fig. 7 an example of the neural
network applied to the intensity and the magnetogram for the
same region: the NOAA 11158 (S21, W28), observed on February
15, 2011. The FOV is divided in two halfs. The upper parts show
the HMI original image both for the continuum image (left panel)
and the magnetogram (right panel). The lower parts display the
enhanced images after applying the neural network.
After the deconvolution of the magnetogram, we find: i) regions with very nearby opposite polarities suffer from an apparent
cancellation in HMI data that can be restored with Enhance, giving rise to an increase in the absolute value of the longitudinal
field; and ii) regions far from magnetized areas do get contaminated by the surroundings in HMI, which are also compensated
for with Enhance, returning smaller longitudinal fields. The left
panel of Fig. 8 shows the density plot of the input vs. output
longitudinal magnetic field. Almost all the points lie in the 1:1
relation. However, points around 1 kG for HMI are promoted to
larger values in absolute value, a factor ∼ 1.3 − 1.4 higher than
the original image (Couvidat et al. 2016).
Another interesting point to study is the range of spatial scales
at which Enhance is adding information. The right panel of Fig.
8 displays the power spectrum of both magnetograms showed in
the right part of Fig. 7. The main difference between both curves
is situated in the range of spatial scales ν = 0.05 − 0.25 pix−1
with a peak at ν = 0.15 pix−1 . In other words, the neural network
is operating mainly at scales between 4 and 20 pixels, where the
smearing effect of the PSF is higher.
The same effect can be seen when a standard Richardson–
Lucy maximum-likelihood algorithm (RL) (including a bilinear
interpolation to carry out the superresolution) is used (see Section
3.2.4 for more details). The power spectrum of the output of
Enhance and the one deconvolved with RL are almost the same
for frequencies below 0.15 pix−1 (equivalent to scales above ∼ 6
pix). For larger frequencies (smaller scales), the RL version adds
noisy small scale structures at a level of ∼80 G, that is not case
with Enhance. We note that the original image has a noise around
∼10 G. To quantify this last point, we have showed in Fig. 8 the
flat spectrum of white noise artificial images with zero mean and
standard deviations σ = 12G and σ = 75G.
3.2.3. Other general properties
Depending on the type of structure analyzed, the effect of the
deconvolution is different. In plage regions, where the magnetic
areas are less clustered than in a sunspot, the impact of the stray
light is higher. Then, Enhance produces a magnetic field that
can increase up to a factor 2 (Yeo et al. 2014), with magnetic
structures smaller in size, as signal smeared onto the surrounding
quiet Sun is put back on its original location. According to the
left panel of Fig 8, fields with smaller amplitudes suffer a larger
relative change. As a guide to the eye, the two dotted lines indicate
a change of a factor 2 in the same figure.
To check these conclusions, we have used a Hinode-SOT
Spectropolarimeter (SP) (Lites et al. 2013) Level 1D6 magnetogram. The region was observed in April 25, 2015 at 04:00h UT
and its pixel size is around 0.30”/pix. Figure 9 shows the increase
of the magnetic field after the deconvolution: magnetic fields of
kG flux were diluted by the PSF and recovered with Enhance. It
was impossible to find the Hinode map of exactly the same region
at exactly the same moment, so that some differences are visible.
However the general details are retrieved. In regions of strong
concentrations, like the ones found in Fig. 7, almost each polarity
is spatially concentrated and increased by a factor below 1.5.
The magnetogram case is more complex than the intensity
map. Many studies (Krivova & Solanki 2004; Pietarila et al. 2013;
Bamba et al. 2014) have demonstrated the influence of the resolution to estimate a value of the magnetic flux and products of
magnetogram as nonlinear force-free extrapolations (Tadesse et al.
2013; DeRosa et al. 2015), to compare with in–situ spacecraft
measurements (Linker et al. 2017).
6
http://sot.lmsal.com/data/sot/level1d/
Article number, page 11 of 14
A&A proofs: manuscript no. aanda
HMI - Original
Y [pixel]
150
Output Network
300
125
250
250
100
200
200
75
150
150
50
100
100
25
50
50
0
0
25
50
75 100
X [pixel]
125
150
0
0
50
100
150 200
X [pixel]
Hinode - Degraded
300
250
300
0
0
50
100
150 200
X [pixel]
250
300
Fig. 9. Left: original HMI magnetogram of a plage region observed on April 25, 2015. Middle: the result of applying Enhance to the HMI
magnetogram. Right: the Hinode magnetogram at the same resolution of Enhance. The magnetic flux has been clipped from −1kG to 1kG.
Contrary to deconvolving intensity images, deconvolving
magnetograms is always a very delicate issue. The difficulty relies
on the presence of cancellation produced during the smearing
with a PSF if magnetic elements of opposite polarities are located
nearby. This never happens for intensity images, which are always non-negative. Consequently, one can arbitrarily increase the
value of nearby positive and negative polarities while maintaining a small quadratic approximation to the desired output. This
effect is typically seen when a standard RL algorithm is used for
deconvolution.
Enhance avoids this effect by learning suitable spatial priors
from the training dataset. It is true that the method will not be
able to separate back two very nearby opposite polarities that
have been fully canceled by the smearing of the PSF. Extensive
tests show that the total absolute flux of each deconvolved image
is almost the same as that in the original image, i.e., the magnetic
field is mainly "reallocated".
3.2.4. Comparison with a standard RL deconvolution
algorithm
As a final step, we compare our results with those of a RL algorithm in a complicated case. Fig. 10 shows the same image
deconvolved with both methods. The output of Enhance is similar to the output of the RL method. Some noisy artifacts are
detected in areas with low magnetic field strength.
A detailed analysis can reveal some differences, tough. In the
light–bridge (LB), the magnetic field is lower in the RL version.
Additionally, the polarity inversion line (PIL) appears more enhanced and splitted in the RL version than in the Enhance one.
The magnetic flux in both areas (LB and PIL) are reduced by a
factor 0.5, which might be an indication of too many iterations.
The magnetic field strength of the umbra is between 50 G and
80 G higher in the RL version.
As a final test, we have checked the difference between the
original image and the output of Enhance convolved with the
PSF. The average relative difference is around 4% (which is in
the range 10-80 G depending on the flux of the pixel), which goes
down to less than 1% in the RL case (this is a clear indication
that Enhance is introducing prior information not present in the
data). Additionally, our network is orders of magnitude faster
than RL, it does not create noisy artifacts and the estimation of
the magnetic field is as robust as a RL method.
Article number, page 12 of 14
4. Conclusions and future work
This paper presents the first successful deconvolution and superresolution applied on solar images using deep convolutional neural network. It represents, after Asensio Ramos et al. (2017), a
new step toward the implementation of new machine learning
techniques in the field of Solar Physics.
Single-image superresolution and deconvolution, either for
continuum images or for magnetograms, is an ill-defined problem.
It requires the addition of extra knowledge for what to expect in
the high-resolution images. The deep learning approach presented
in this paper extracts this knowledge from the simulations and
also applies a deconvolution. All this is done very fast, almost in
real-time, and to images of arbitrary size. We hope that Enhance
will allow researchers to study small-scale details in HMI images
and magnetograms, something that cannot be currently done.
Often, HMI is used not as the primary source of information
but as a complement for ground-based observations, providing
the context. For this reason, having enhanced images where you
can analyze the context with increased resolution is interesting.
We have preferred to be conservative and only do superresolution by a factor 2. We have carried out some tests with a larger
factor, but the results were not satisfactory. It remains to test
whether other techniques proposed in this explosively growing
field can work better. Among others, techniques like a gradual
up-sampling (Zhao et al. 2017), recursive convolutional layers
(Kim et al. 2015), recursive residual blocks (Tai et al. 2017) or using adversarial networks as a more elaborate loss function (Ledig
et al. 2016; Schawinski et al. 2017) can potentially produce better
results.
We open-source Enhance7 , providing the methods to apply
the trained networks used in this work to HMI images or re-train
them using new data. In the future, we plan to extend the technique to other telescopes/instruments to generate superresolved
and deconvolved images.
Acknowledgements. We would like to thank the anonymous referee for its comments and suggestions. We thank Mark Cheung for kindly sharing with us
the simulation data, without which this study would not have been possible.
Financial support by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness
through project AYA2014-60476-P is gratefully acknowledged. CJDB acknowledges Fundación La Caixa for the financial support received in the form of a PhD
contract. We also thank the NVIDIA Corporation for the donation of the Titan X
GPU used in this research. This research has made use of NASA’s Astrophysics
7
https://github.com/cdiazbas/enhance
C. J. Díaz Baso and A. Asensio Ramos: Enhancing HMI images
Output Network
400
Data System Bibliographic Services. We acknowledge the community effort devoted to the development of the following open-source packages that were used
in this work: numpy (numpy.org), matplotlib (matplotlib.org), Keras
(keras.io), and Tensorflow tensorflow.org and SunPy sunpy.org.
350
300
References
Y [pixel]
250
200
150
100
50
0
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
300
350
400
300
350
400
Richardson-Lucy
400
350
300
Y [pixel]
250
200
150
100
50
0
0
50
100
150
200
250
Difference: RL - NN
400
350
300
Y [pixel]
250
200
150
100
50
0
0
50
100
150
200 250
X [pixel]
Fig. 10. Upper: the output of Enhance. Middle: output after applying a
Richardson-Lucy method to deconvolve the image. Lower: the difference
between the RL version and the Enhance output. The magnetic flux has
been clipped to ±1.5kG and ±100G in the last image.
Asensio Ramos, A. & de la Cruz Rodríguez, J. 2015, A&A, 577, A140
Asensio Ramos, A., Requerey, I. S., & Vitas, N. 2017, A&A, 604, A11
Asensio Ramos, A. & Socas-Navarro, H. 2005, A&A, 438, 1021
Bamba, Y., Kusano, K., Imada, S., & Iida, Y. 2014, PASJ, 66, S16
Bello González, N., Yelles Chaouche, L., Okunev, O., & Kneer, F. 2009, A&A,
494, 1091
Bishop, C. M. 1996, Neural networks for pattern recognition (Oxford University
Press)
Borman, S. & Stevenson, R. L. 1998, Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems, 374
Carroll, T. A. & Kopf, M. 2008, A&A, 481, L37
Cheung, M. C. M., Rempel, M., Title, A. M., & Schüssler, M. 2010, ApJ, 720,
233
Ciuca, R., Hernández, O. F., & Wolman, M. 2017, ArXiv e-prints
[arXiv:1708.08878]
Colak, T. & Qahwaji, R. 2008, Sol. Phys., 248, 277
Couvidat, S., Schou, J., Hoeksema, J. T., et al. 2016, Sol. Phys., 291, 1887
Danilovic, S., Gandorfer, A., Lagg, A., et al. 2008, A&A, 484, L17
Danilovic, S., Schüssler, M., & Solanki, S. K. 2010, A&A, 513, A1
DeRosa, M. L., Wheatland, M. S., Leka, K. D., et al. 2015, ApJ, 811, 107
Dong, C., Change Loy, C., He, K., & Tang, X. 2015, ArXiv e-prints
[arXiv:1501.00092]
Dong, C., Change Loy, C., & Tang, X. 2016, ArXiv e-prints
[arXiv:1608.00367]
Hayat, K. 2017, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1706.09077]
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. 2015, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1512.03385]
Ichimoto, K., Lites, B., Elmore, D., et al. 2008, Sol. Phys., 249, 233
Ioffe, S. & Szegedy, C. 2015, in Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-15), ed. D. Blei & F. Bach (JMLR Workshop and Conference Proceedings), 448–456
Kim, J., Lee, J. K., & Lee, K. M. 2015, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1511.04491]
Kingma, D. P. & Ba, J. 2014, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1412.6980]
Kosugi, T., Matsuzaki, K., Sakao, T., et al. 2007, Sol. Phys., 243, 3
Krivova, N. A. & Solanki, S. K. 2004, A&A, 417, 1125
LeCun, Y. & Bengio, Y. 1998, in The Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural
Networks, ed. M. A. Arbib (Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press), 255–258
LeCun, Y., Bottou, L., Orr, G. B., & Müller, K.-R. 1998, in Neural Networks:
Tricks of the Trade, This Book is an Outgrowth of a 1996 NIPS Workshop
(London, UK, UK: Springer-Verlag), 9–50
Ledig, C., Theis, L., Huszar, F., et al. 2016, ArXiv e-prints
[arXiv:1609.04802]
Linker, J. A., Caplan, R. M., Downs, C., et al. 2017, ArXiv e-prints
[arXiv:1708.02342]
Lites, B. W., Akin, D. L., Card, G., et al. 2013, Sol. Phys., 283, 579
Nair, V. & Hinton, G. E. 2010, in Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-10), June 21-24, 2010, Haifa, Israel,
807–814
Pesnell, W. D., Thompson, B. J., & Chamberlin, P. C. 2012, Sol. Phys., 275, 3
Peyrard, C., Mamalet, F., & Garcia, C. 2015, in VISAPP (1), ed. J. Braz, S. Battiato, & F. H. Imai (SciTePress), 84–91
Pietarila, A., Bertello, L., Harvey, J. W., & Pevtsov, A. A. 2013, Sol. Phys., 282,
91
Quintero Noda, C., Asensio Ramos, A., Orozco Suárez, D., & Ruiz Cobo, B.
2015, A&A, 579, A3
Richardson, W. H. 1972, Journal of the Optical Society of America (1917-1983),
62, 55
Ruiz Cobo, B. & Asensio Ramos, A. 2013, A&A, 549, L4
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. 1988 (Cambridge, MA, USA:
MIT Press), 696–699
Schawinski, K., Zhang, C., Zhang, H., Fowler, L., & Santhanam, G. K. 2017,
MNRAS, 467, L110
Scherrer, P. H., Schou, J., Bush, R. I., et al. 2012, Solar Physics, 275, 207
Schmidhuber, J. 2014, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1404.7828]
Shi, W., Caballero, J., Huszár, F., et al. 2016, ArXiv e-prints
[arXiv:1609.05158]
Simonyan, K. & Zisserman, A. 2014, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1409.1556]
Socas-Navarro, H. 2005, ApJ, 621, 545
Stein, R. F. 2012, Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 9, 4
Stein, R. F. & Nordlund, Å. 2012, ApJ, 753, L13
Tadesse, T., Wiegelmann, T., Inhester, B., et al. 2013, A&A, 550, A14
Article number, page 13 of 14
A&A proofs: manuscript no. aanda
Tai, Y., Yang, J., & Liu, X. 2017, in In Proceeding of IEEE Computer Vision and
Pattern Recognition, Honolulu, HI
Tipping, M. E. & Bishop, C. M. 2003, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (MIT Press), 1303–1310
Tsuneta, S., Ichimoto, K., Katsukawa, Y., et al. 2008, Sol. Phys., 249, 167
van Noort, M. 2012, A&A, 548, A5
Vögler, A., Shelyag, S., Schüssler, M., et al. 2005, A&A, 429, 335
Wachter, R., Schou, J., Rabello-Soares, M. C., et al. 2012, Sol. Phys., 275, 261
Xu, L., Ren, J. S. J., Liu, C., & Jia, J. 2014, in Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS’14 (Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press), 1790–1798
Yeo, K. L., Feller, A., Solanki, S. K., et al. 2014, A&A, 561, A22
Zhao, Y., Wang, R., Dong, W., et al. 2017, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1703.04244]
Article number, page 14 of 14
| 1cs.CV
|
Measurement uncertainty relations for position and
momentum: Relative entropy formulation
arXiv:1705.09949v1 [quant-ph] 28 May 2017
Alberto Barchielli1,2,3 , Matteo Gregoratti1,2, Alessandro Toigo1,3
1
Politecnico di Milano, Dipartimento di Matematica,
Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, I-20133 Milano, Italy,
2
Istituto Nazionale di Alta Matematica (INDAM-GNAMPA),
3
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Sezione di Milano
30th May 2017
Abstract
Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle has recently led to general measurement uncertainty relations for
quantum systems: incompatible observables can be measured jointly or in sequence only with some
unavoidable approximation, which can be quantified in various ways. The relative entropy is the natural theoretical quantifier of the information loss when a ‘true’ probability distribution is replaced by
an approximating one. In this paper, we provide a lower bound for the amount of information that is
lost by replacing the distributions of the sharp position and momentum observables, as they could be
obtained with two separate experiments, by the marginals of any smeared joint measurement. The bound
is obtained by introducing an entropic error function, and optimizing it over a suitable class of covariant
approximate joint measurements. We fully exploit two cases of target observables: (1) n-dimensional position and momentum vectors; (2) two components of position and momentum along different directions.
In (1), we connect the quantum bound to the dimension n; in (2), going from parallel to orthogonal directions, we show the transition from highly incompatible observables to compatible ones. For simplicity,
we develop the theory only for Gaussian states and measurements.
1 Introduction
Uncertainty relations for position and momentum [40] have always been deeply related to the foundations
of Quantum Mechanics. For several decades, their axiomatization has been of ‘preparation’ type: an
inviolable lower bound for the widths of the position and momentum distributions, holding in any quantum
state. Such kinds of uncertainty relations, which are now known as preparation uncertainty relations
(PURs), have been later extended to arbitrary sets of n ≥ 2 observables [44–46,59]. All PURs trace back to
the celebrated Robertson’s formulation [58] of Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle: for any two observables,
represented by self-adjoint operators A and B, the product of the variances of A and B is bounded from
below by the expectation value of their commutator; in formulae, Varρ (A) Varρ (B) ≥ 41 |Tr{ρ[A, B]}|2 ,
where Varρ is the variance of an observable measured in any system state ρ. In the case of position Q and
2
momentum P , this inequality gives Heisenberg’s relation Varρ (Q) Varρ (P ) ≥ ~4 . About 30 years after
Heisenberg and Robertson’s formulation, Hirschman attempted a first statement of position and momentum
uncertainties in terms of informational quantities. This led him to a formulation of PURs based on Shannon
entropy [41]; his bound was later refined [12, 14], and extended to discrete observables [50]. Also other
entropic quantities have been used [35]. We refer to [31, 63] for an extensive review on entropic PURs.
However, Heisenberg’s original intent [40] was more focused on the unavoidable disturbance that a
measurement of position produces on a subsequent measurement of momentum [21, 25, 26, 53–56, 65].
Trying to give a better understanding of his idea, more recently new formulations were introduced, based
1
PUR
on a ‘measurement’ interpretation of uncertainty, rather than giving bounds on the probability distributions of the target observables. Indeed, with the modern development of the quantum theory of measurement and the introduction of positive operator valued measures and instruments [1, 20, 23, 34, 39, 44],
it became possible to deal with approximate measurements of incompatible observables and to formulate measurement uncertainty relations (MURs) for position and momentum, as well as for more general
observables. The MURs quantify the degree of approximation (or inaccuracy and disturbance) made by
replacing the original incompatible observables with a joint approximate measurement of them. A very
rich literature on this topic flourished in the last 20 years, and various kinds of MURs have been proposed, based on distances between probability distributions, noise quantifications, conditional entropy,
etc. [19, 21, 22, 24–26, 31, 32, 38, 53–56, 65, 66].
In this paper, we develop a new information-theoretical formulation of MURs for position and momentum, using the notion of the relative entropy (or Kullback-Leibler divergence) of two probabilities.
The relative entropy S(pkq) is an informational quantity which is precisely tailored to quantify the amount
of information that is lost by using an approximating probability q in place of the target one p. Although
classical and quantum relative entropies have already been used in the evaluation of the performances of
quantum measurements [1, 6–11, 18, 19, 32, 51, 51], their first application to MURs is very recent [2].
In [2], only MURs for discrete observables were considered. The present work is a first attempt to
extend that information-theoretical approach to the continuous setting. This extension is not trivial and
reveals peculiar problems, that are not present in the discrete case. However, the nice properties of the
relative entropy, such as its scale invariance, allow for a satisfactory formulation of the entropic MURs also
for position and momentum.
We deal with position and momentum in two possible scenarios. Firstly, we consider the case of ndimensional position and momentum, since it allows to treat either scalar particles, or vector ones, or even
the case of multi-particle systems. This is the natural level of generality, and our treatment extends without
difficulty to it. Then, we consider a couple made up of one position and one momentum component along
two different directions of the n-space. In this case, we can see how our theory behaves when one moves
with continuity from a highly incompatible case (parallel components) to a compatible case (orthogonal
ones).
The continuous case needs much care when dealing with arbitrary quantum states and approximating
observables. Indeed, it is difficult to evaluate or even bound the relative entropy if some assumption is
not made on probability distributions. In order to overcome these technicalities and focus on the quantum
content of MURs, in this paper we consider only the case of Gaussian preparation states and Gaussian
measurement apparatuses [16, 36, 45, 46, 49, 59, 62]. Moreover, we identify the class of the approximate
joint measurements with the class of the joint POVMs satisfying the same symmetry properties of their
target position and momentum observables [20, 44]. We are supported in this assumption by the fact that,
in the discrete case [2], simmetry covariant measurements turn out to be the best approximations without
any hypothesis (see also [24–26, 65, 66] for a similar appearance of covariance within MURs for different
uncertainty measures).
We now sketch the main results of the paper. In the vector case, we consider approximate joint measurements M of the position Q ≡ (Q1 , . . . , Qn ) and the momentum P ≡ (P1 , . . . , Pn ). We find the
following entropic MUR (Theorem 21, Remark 14): for every choice of two positive thresholds ǫ1 , ǫ2 ,
with ǫ1 ǫ2 ≥ ~2 /4, there exists a Gaussian state ρ with position variance matrix Aρ ≥ ǫ1 1 and momentum
variance matrix B ρ ≥ ǫ2 1 such that
~
~
S(Qρ kM1,ρ ) + S(Pρ kM2,ρ ) ≥ n (log e) ln 1 + √
−
(1)
√
2 ǫ1 ǫ2
~ + 2 ǫ1 ǫ2
for all Gaussian approximate joint measurements M of Q and P . Here Qρ and Pρ are the distributions of
position and momentum in the state ρ, and Mρ is the distribution of M in the state ρ, with marginals M1,ρ
and M2,ρ ; the two marginals turn out to be noisy versions of Qρ and Pρ . The lower bound is strictly positive
and it grows linearly with the dimension n. The thresholds ǫ1 and ǫ2 are peculiar of the continuous case and
they have a classical explanation: the relative entropy S(pkq) → +∞ if the variance of p vanishes faster
than the variance of q, so that, given M, it is trivial to find a state ρ enjoying (1) if arbtrarily small variances
are allowed. What is relevant in our result is that the total loss of information S(Qρ kM1,ρ ) + S(Pρ kM2,ρ )
exceeds the lower bound even if we forbid target distributions with small variances.
2
MUR
The MUR (1) shows that there is no Gaussian joint measurement which can approximate arbitrarily
well both Q and P . The lower bound (1) is a consequence of the incompatibility between Q and P and,
indeed, it vanishes in the classical limit ~ → 0. Both the relative entropies and the lower bound in (1)
are scale invariant. Moreover, for fixed ǫ1 and ǫ2 , we prove the existence and uniqueness of an optimal
approximate joint measurement, and we fully characterize it.
In the scalar case, we consider approximate joint measurements M of the position Qu = u · Q along
the direction u and the momentum Pv = v · P along the direction v, where u · v = cos α. We find two
different entropic MURs. The first entropic MUR in the scalar case is similar to the vector case (Theorem
17, Remark 11). The second one is (Theorem 15):
S(Qu,ρ kM1,ρ ) + S(Pv,ρ kM2,ρ ) ≥ cρ (α),
(2)
!
)
~| cos α|
~| cos α|
p
−
,
cρ (α) = (log e) ln 1 + p
2 Var (Qu,ρ ) Var (Pv,ρ )
~| cos α| + 2 Var (Qu,ρ ) Var (Pv,ρ )
(
for all Gaussian states ρ and all Gaussian joint approximate measurements M of Qu and Pv . This lower
bound holds for every Gaussian state ρ without constraints on the position and momentum variances
Var (Qu,ρ ) and Var (Pv,ρ ), it is strictly positive unless u and v are orthogonal, but it is state dependent.
Again, the relative entropies and the lower bound are scale invariant.
The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we introduce our target position and momentum observables, we discuss their general properties and define some related quantities (spectral measures, mean
vectors and variance matrices, PURs for second order quantum moments, Weyl operators, Gaussian states).
Section 3 is devoted to the definitions and main properties of the relative and differential (Shannon) entropies. Section 4 is a review on the entropic PURs in the continuous case [12, 14, 41], with a particular focus
on their lack of scale invariance. This is a flaw due to the very definition of differential entropy, and one of
the reasons that lead us to introduce relative entropy based MURs. In Section 5 we construct the covariant
observables which will be used as approximate joint measurements of the position and momentum target
observables. Finally, in Section 6 the main results on MURs that we sketched above are presented in detail.
Some conclusions are discussed in Section 7.
2 Target observables and states
Let us start with the usual position and momentum operators, which satisfy the canonical commutation
rules:
(3)
Q ≡ (Q1 , . . . , Qn ),
P ≡ (P1 , . . . , Pn ),
Qi , Pj = i~δij .
Each of the vector operators has n components; it could be the case of a single particle in one or more
dimensions (n = 1, 2, 3), or several scalar or vector particles, or the quadratures of n modes of the electromagnetic field. We assume the Hilbert space H to be irreducible for the algebra generated by the canonical
operators Q and P . An observable of the quantum system H is identified with a positive operator valued measure (POVM); in the paper, we shall consider observables with outcomes in Rk endowed with its
Borel σ-algebra B(Rk ). The use of POVMs to represent observables in quantum theory is standard and
the definition can be found in many textbooks [20, 23, 34, 37]; the alternative name “non-orthogonal resolutions of the identity” is also used [44–46]. Following [20, 23, 38, 46], a sharp observable is an observable
represented by a projection valued measure (pvm); it is standard to identify a sharp observable on the outcome space Rk with the k self-adjoint operators corresponding to it by spectral theorem. Two observables
are jointly measurable or compatible if there exists a POVM having them as marginals. Because of the
non-vanishing commutators, each couple Qi , Pi , as well as the vectors Q, P , are not jointly measurable.
We denote by T(H) the trace class operators on H, by S ⊂ T(H) the subset of the statistical operators
(or states, preparations), and by L(H) the space of the linear bounded operators.
2.1 Position and momentum
Our target observables will be either n-dimensional position and momentum (vector case) or position and
momentum along two different directions of Rn (scalar case). The second case allows to give an example
3
H
POVM
B(Rk )
pvm
S, T(H)
L(H)
ranging with continuity from maximally incompatible observables to compatible ones.
2.1.1 Vector observables
As target observables we take Q and P as in (3) and we denote by Q(A), P(B), A, B ∈ B(Rn ), their
pvm’s, that is
Z
Z
pi P(dp).
(4)
xi Q(dx),
Pi =
Qi =
Rn
Rn
Then, the distributions in the state ρ ∈ S of a sharp position and a sharp momentum measurements (denoted
by Qρ and Pρ ) are absolutely continuous with respect to the Lebesgue measure; we denote by f (•|ρ) and
g(•|ρ) their probability densities: ∀A, B ∈ B(Rn ),
Z
Z
g(p|ρ)dp.
(5)
f (x|ρ)dx,
Pρ (B) = Tr {ρP(B)} =
Qρ (A) = Tr {ρQ(A)} =
B
A
In the Dirac notation, if |xi and |pi are the improper position and momentum eigenvectors, these densities
take the expressions f (x|ρ) = hx|ρ|xi and g(p|ρ) = hp|ρ|pi, respectively. The mean vectors and the
variance matrices of these distributions will be given in (7) and (8).
2.1.2 Scalar observables
As target observables we take the position along a given direction u and the momentum along another
given direction v:
Qu = u · Q,
Pv = v · P ,
with
u, v ∈ Rn ,
|u| = |v| = 1,
u · v = cos α.
(6)
In this case we have [Qu , Pv ] = i~ cos α, so that Qu and Pv are not jointly measurable, unless the directions u and v are orthogonal.
Their pvm’s are denoted by Qu and Pv , their distributions in a state ρ by Qu,ρ and Pv,ρ , and their
corresponding probability densities by fu (•|ρ) and gv (•|ρ): ∀A, B ∈ B(R),
Z
Z
Qu,ρ (A) = Tr{Qu (A)ρ} =
fu (x|ρ) dx,
Pv,ρ (B) = Tr{Pv (A)ρ} =
gv (p|ρ) dp.
A
B
Of course, the densities in the scalar case are marginals of the densities in the vector case. Means and
variances will be given in (11).
2.2 Quantum moments.
Let S2 be the set of states for which the second moments of position and momentum are finite:
Z
Z
2
2
|p| g(p|ρ)dp < +∞ .
|x| f (x|ρ)dx < +∞,
S2 := ρ ∈ S :
S2
Rn
Rn
Then, the mean vector and the variance matrix of the position Q in the state ρ ∈ S2 are
Z
ρ
xi f (x|ρ)dx ≡ Tr {ρQi } ,
ai :=
Rn
Z
(xi − aρi ) xj − aρj f (x|ρ)dx ≡ Tr ρ (Qi − aρi ) Qj − aρj ,
Aρij :=
(7)
Rn
while for the momentum P we have
bρi :=
ρ
Bij
:=
Z
Rn
(pi −
bρi )
Z
Rn
pj −
pi g(p|ρ)dp ≡ Tr {ρPi } ,
bρj g(p|ρ)dp
4
≡ Tr ρ (Pi −
bρi )
Pj −
bρj
(8)
.
For ρ ∈ S2 it is possible to introduce also the mixed ‘quantum covariances’
)
(
(Qi − aρi )(Pj − bρj ) + (Pj − bρj )(Qi − aρi )
ρ
.
Cij := Tr ρ
2
(9)
ρ
Since there is no joint measurement for the position Q and momentum P , the quantum covariances Cij
are not covariances of a joint distribution, and thus they do not have a classical probabilistic interpretation.
By means of the moments above, we construct the three real n × n matrices Aρ , B ρ , C ρ , the 2ndimensional vector µρ and the symmetric 2n × 2n matrix V ρ , with
ρ
ρ
a
A
Cρ
ρ
µρ :=
,
V
:=
.
(10)
bρ
(C ρ )T B ρ
We say V ρ is the quantum variance matrix of position and momentum in the state ρ. In [59] dimensionless
canonical operators are considered, but apart from this, our matrix V ρ corresponds to their “noise matrix
in real form”; the name “variance matrix” is also used [49, 60].
In a similar way, we can introduce all the moments related to the position Qu and momentum Pv
introduced in (6). For ρ ∈ S2 , the means and variances are respectively
u · aρ ,
Var(Qu,ρ ) = u · Aρ u,
v · bρ ,
Var(Pv,ρ ) = v · B ρ v.
(11)
Similarly to (9), we have also the ‘quantum covariance’ u · C ρ v ≡ v · (C ρ )T u. Then, we collect the two
means in a single vector and we introduce the variance matrix:
u · aρ
u · Aρ u u · C ρ v
ρ
ρ
µu,v :=
,
Vu,v :=
.
(12)
v · bρ
u · C ρv v · Bρv
A C
Proposition 1. Let V =
be a real symmetric 2n × 2n block matrix with the same dimensions
CT B
of a quantum variance matrix. Define
i
0
~1
A
C ± i ~2 1
≡ V ± Ω,
with
Ω :=
.
(13)
V± :=
−~1 0
C T ∓ i ~2 1
B
2
Then
V = V ρ for some state ρ ∈ S2 ⇐⇒ V+ ≥ 0 ⇐⇒ V− ≥ 0.
(14)
In this case we have: V ≥ 0, A > 0, B > 0, and
~2 ′ ′ 2
(v · u ) ,
∀u′ ∈ Rn , ∀v ′ ∈ Rn .
(15)
4
The inequalities (14) for V± tell us exactly when a (positive semi-definite) real matrix V is the quantum
variance matrix of position and momentum in a state ρ. Moreover, they are the multidimensional version
of the usual uncertainty principle expressed through the variances [44, 46, 59], hence they represent a form
of PURs. The block matrix Ω in the definition of V± is useful to compress formulae involving position
and momentum; moreover, it makes simpler to compare our equations with their frequent dimensionless
versions (with ~ = 1) in the literature [36, 49].
2
(u′ · Au′ )(v ′ · Bv ′ ) ≥ (v ′ · Cu′ ) +
Proof. Equivalences (14) are well known, see e.g. [44, Sect. 1.1.5], [46, Eq. (2.20)], [59, Theor. 2]. Then
V = 21 V+ + 12 V− ≥ 0.
′
αu
By using the real block vector
, with arbitrary α, β ∈ R and given u′ , v ′ ∈ Rn , the semiβv ′
positivity (14) implies
u′ · Au′
u′ · Cv ′ ± i ~2 u′ · v ′
≥ 0,
∀u′ ∈ Rn , ∀v ′ ∈ Rn ,
v ′ · C T u′ ∓ i ~2 v ′ · u′
v ′ · Bv ′
which in turn implies A ≥ 0, B ≥ 0 and (15). Then, by choosing u′ = v ′ = ui , where u1 , . . . , un are the
eigenvectors of A (since A is a real symmetric matrix, ui ∈ Rn for all i), one gets the strict positivity of
all the eigenvalues of A; analogously, one gets B > 0.
5
Inequality (15) for u′ = u and v ′ = v becomes the uncertainty rule à la Robertson [58] for the
observables in (6) (a position component and a momentum component spanning an arbitrary angle α):
2
Var(Qu,ρ ) Var(Pv,ρ ) ≥ (v · C ρ u) +
Inequality (16) is equivalent to
ρ
Vu,v
~2
2
(cos α) .
4
i~
0 1
±
cos α
≥ 0.
−1 0
2
(16)
(17)
Since V± are block matrices, their positive semi-definiteness can be studied by means of the Schur
complements [27, 47, 57]. However, as V± are complex block matrices with a very peculiar structure,
special results hold for them. Before summarizing the properties of V± in the next proposition, we need a
simple auxiliary algebraic lemma.
Lemma 2. Let A and B be complex self-adjoint matrices such that A ≥ B ≥ 0. Then det A ≥ det B ≥ 0,
and the equality det A = det B holds iff A = B.
Proof. Let λ↓i (A) and λ↓i (B) be the ordered decreasing sequences of the eigenvalues of A and B, respectively. Then, by Weyl’s inequality, A ≥ B ≥ 0 implies λ↓i (A) ≥ λ↓i (B) ≥ 0 for every i [13, Sect. III.2].
This gives the first statement. Moreover, if A ≥ B ≥ 0 and det A = det B, we get λ↓i (A) = λ↓i (B) for
every i. Then A = B because A − B ≥ 0 and Tr{A − B} = 0.
A C
Proposition 3. Let V =
be a real symmetric 2n × 2n matrix with the same dimensions of a
CT B
quantum variance matrix. Then V+ ≥ 0 (or, equivalently, V− ≥ 0) if and only if A > 0 and
i~
~2 −1 i~ −1
i~
−1
T
C ± 1 ≡ C T A−1 C +
(18)
A C − C T A−1 .
A ∓
B≥ C ∓ 1 A
2
2
4
2
In this case we have
~2 −1
~2 −1
A ≥
A > 0.
4
4
Moreover, we have also the following properties for the various determinants:
B ≥ C T A−1 C +
(det A)(det B) ≥ det V = (det A) det B − C T A−1 C ≥
2n
~
det V =
2
⇔
B = C T A−1 C +
2n
~
(det A)(det B) =
2
⇔
~2 −1
A
4
B=
⇒
~2 −1
A ,
4
(19)
2n
~
,
2
(20)
CA = AC T ,
(21)
C = 0.
(22)
By interchanging A with B and C with C T in (18)-(22) equivalent results are obtained.
Proof. Since we already know that V+ ≥ 0 implies the invertibility of A, the equivalence between (14)
and (18) with A > 0 follows from [47, Theor. 1.12 p. 34] (see also [57, Theor. 11.6] or [27, Lemma 3.2]).
In (19), the first inequality follows by summing up the two inequalities in (18). The last two ones are
immediate by the positivity of A−1 .
The equality in (20) is Schur’s formula for the determinant of block matrices [47, Theor. 1.1 p. 19].
Then, the first inequality is immediate by the lemma above and the trivial relation B ≥ B − C T A−1 C; the
second one follows from (19):
2
(~/2)2n
~ −1
~2 −1
=
A
⇒ det B − C T A−1 C ≥ det
A
.
B − C T A−1 C ≥
4
4
det A
6
2
2n
The equality det V = ~2
is equivalent to det B − C T A−1 C = det ~4 A−1 ; since the latter
two determinants are evaluated on ordered positive matrices by (19), they coincide if and only if the respective arguments are equal(Lemma 2); this shows the equivalence in (21). Then, by (18), the self-adjoint
−1
C − C T A−1 is both positive semi-definite and negative semi-definite; hence it is null, that
matrix i~
2 A
T
is, CA = AC .
2
~ 2n
~ 2n
B)
=
Finally, B = ~4 A−1 gives (det A)(det
trivially.
Conversely,
(det
A)(det
B)
=
2
2
implies det B = det B − C T A−1 C by (20); since B ≥ B − C T A−1 C ≥ 0 by (19), Lemma 2 then
implies C T A−1 C = 0 and so C = 0.
By (18) and (19), every time three matrices A, B, C define the quantum variance matrix of a state ρ,
e = 0. This fact can be used to characterize when two positive matrices A and
the same holds for A, B, C
B are the diagonal blocks of some quantum variance matrix, or two positive numbers cQ and cP are the
position and momentum variances of a quantum state along the two directions u and v.
Proposition 4. Two real matrices A > 0 and B > 0, having the dimension of the square of a length and
momentum, respectively, are the diagonal blocks of a quantum variance matrix V ρ if and only if
B≥
~2 −1
A .
4
Two real numbers cQ > 0 and cP > 0, having the dimension of the square of a length and momentum,
respectively, are such that cQ = Var(Qu,ρ ) and cP = Var(Pv,ρ ) for some state ρ if and only if
cQ cP ≥
2
~
cos α .
2
Proof. For A and
B, the necessity follows from (19).
A 0
ρ
V =
.
0 B
The sufficiency comes from (18) by choosing
For cQ and cP , the necessity follows from (15). The sufficiency comes from (18) with V ρ =
and for example the following choices of A and B:
A
0
0
B
- if cos α = ±1, we take A = cQ 1 and B = cP 1;
- if cos α = 0, we let
A = cQ uuT +
~2
vv T + A′
4cP
B=
~2
uuT + cP vv T + B ′ ,
4cQ
where A′ and B ′ are any two scalar multiples of the orthogonal projection onto {u, v}⊥ satisfying
2
B ′ ≥ ~4 A′ −1 when restricted to {u, v}⊥ ;
- if cos α ∈
/ {0, ±1}, we choose
1
2
T
A = cQ uuT −
(uv T + vuT ) +
vv
+ A′
cos α
(cos α)2
cP
(sin α)2 + (cos α)4
1
T
T
T
T
B=
+ B′,
uu
−
(uv
+
vu
)
+
vv
(sin α)4
(cos α)2
cos α
where A′ and B ′ are as in the previous item.
In the last two cases, we chose A and B in such a way that B =
span of {u, v}.
7
cQ cP
−1
(cos α)2 A
when restricted to the linear
2.3 Weyl operators and Gaussian states
In the following, we shall introduce Gaussian states, Gaussian observables and covariant observables on
the phase-space. In all these instances, the Weyl operators are involved; here we recall their definition and
some properties (see e.g. [45, Sect. 5.2] or [46, Sect. 12.2], where, however, the definition differs from ours
in that the Weyl operators are composed with the map Ω−1 of (13)).
Definition 1. The Weyl operators are the unitary operators defined by
W (x, p) := exp
Y
n
n
Y
ixj pj
i
i
i
i
e ~ (pj Qj −xj Pj ) =
(p · Q − x · P ) =
e ~ pj Qj e− ~ xj Pj e− 2~ . (23)
~
j=1
j=1
The Weyl operators (23) satisfy the composition rule
i
W (x1 , p1 )W (x2 , p2 ) = exp − (x1 · p2 − x2 · p1 ) W (x1 + x2 , p1 + p2 );
2~
in particular, this implies the commutation relation
W (x1 , p1 )W (x2 , p2 ) = exp −i xT1
pT1
Ω
−1
x2
W (x2 , p2 )W (x1 , p1 ).
p2
(24)
These commutation relations imply the translation property
W (x, p)∗ Qi W (x, p) = Qi + xi ,
W (x, p)∗ Pi W (x, p) = Pi + pi ,
due to this property, the Weyl operators are also known as displacement operators.
With a slight abuse of notation, we shall sometimes use the identification
x
W (x, p) ≡ W
,
p
i = 1, . . . , n;
(25)
(26)
x
is a block column vector belonging to the phase-space Rn × Rn ≡ R2n ; here, the first block
p
x is a position and the second block p is a momentum.
By means of the Weyl operators, it is possible to define the characteristic function of any trace-class
operator.
where
Definition 2. For any operator ρ ∈ T(H), its characteristic function is the complex valued function ρb :
R2n → C defined by
k
ρb(w) := Tr {ρW (−Ωw)} ,
w≡
.
(27)
l
Note that k is the inverse of a length and l is the inverse of a momentum, so that w is a block vector
living in the space R2n ≡ Rn × Rn regarded as the dual of the phase-space.
Instead of the characteristic function, sometimes the so called Weyl transform Tr {W (x, p)ρ} is introduced [45, 49].
By [45, Prop. 5.3.2, Theor. 5.3.3], we have ρb(w) ∈ L2 (R2n ) and the following trace formula holds:
∀ρ, σ ∈ T(H),
n Z
~
∗
Tr{σ ρ} =
σ
b(w) ρb(w) dw.
(28)
2π
R2n
As a corollary [45, Coroll. 5.3.4], we have that a state ρ ∈ S is pure if and only if
n Z
~
2
|b
ρ(w)| dw = 1.
2π
2n
R
8
By [64, Lemma 3.1], [23, Prop. 8.5.(e)], the trace formula also implies
Z
1
∗
W (x, p)ρW (x, p) dxdp = Tr{ρ}1,
(2π~)n R2n
∀ρ ∈ T(H) .
(29)
Moreover, the following inversion formula ensures that the characteristic function ρb completely characterizes the state ρ [45, Coroll. 5.3.5]:
n Z
~
ρ=
W (Ωw) ρb(w)dw,
∀ρ ∈ T(H) .
2π
R2n
The last two integrals are defined in the weak operator topology.
Finally, for ρ ∈ S2 , the moments (7)–(10) can be expressed as in [45, Sect. 5.4]:
−i
∂ ρb(w)
∂wi
0
= µρi ,
−
∂ 2 ρb(w)
∂wi ∂wj
0
= Vijρ + µρi µρj .
Definition 3 ( [44–46, 49, 59, 60]). A state ρ is Gaussian if
1
ρb(w) = exp iwT µρ − wT V ρ w
2
1
= exp i (k · aρ + l · bρ ) − (k · Aρ k + l · B ρ l) − k · C ρ l ,
2
(30)
(31)
for a vector µρ ∈ R2n and a real 2n × 2n matrix V ρ such that V+ρ ≥ 0.
The condition V+ρ ≥ 0 is necessary and sufficient in order that the function (31) defines the characteristic function of a quantum state [45, Theor. 5.5.1], [46, Theor. 12.17]. Therefore, Gaussian states are
exactly the states whose characteristic function is the exponential of a second order polynomial [45, Eq.
(5.5.49)], [46, Eq. (12.80)].
We shall denote by G the set of the Gaussian states; we have G ⊂ S2 ⊂ S. By (30), the vectors aρ , bρ
and the matrices Aρ , B ρ , C ρ characterizing a Gaussian state ρ are just its first and second order quantum
moments introduced in (7)–(9). By (31), the corresponding distributions of position and momentum are
Gaussian, namely
Qρ = N (aρ ; Aρ ),
Qu,ρ = N (u · aρ ; u · Aρ u),
Pρ = N (bρ ; B ρ ),
Proposition 5 (Pure Gaussian states). For ρ ∈ G, we have det V ρ =
Proof. The trace formula (28) and (31) give Tr{ρ2 } =
n
(~/2)
√
,
det V ρ
Pv,ρ = N (v · bρ ; v · B ρ v). (32)
~ 2n
2
if and only if ρ is pure.
and this implies the statement.
2n
Proposition 6 (Minimum uncertainty states). For ρ ∈ S2 , we have (det Aρ )(det B ρ ) = ~2
if and only
if ρ is a pure Gaussian state and it factorizes into the product of minimum uncertainty states up to a rotation
of Rn .
2n
2
Proof. If (det Aρ )(det B ρ ) = ~2
, then the equivalence (22) gives B ρ = ~4 (Aρ )−1 , so that the variance matrices Aρ and B ρ have a common eigenbasis u1 , . . . , un . Thus, all the corresponding couples of
2
position Qui and momentum Pui have minimum uncertainties: Var(Qui ) Var(Pui ) = ~4 . Therefore,
if we consider the factorization of the Hilbert space H = H1 ⊗ · · · ⊗ Hn corresponding to the basis
u1 , . . . , un , all the partial traces of the state ρ on each factor Hi are minimum uncertainty states. Since for
n = 1 the minimum uncertainty states are pure and Gaussian, the state ρ is a pure product Gaussian state.
The converse is immediate.
3 Relative and differential entropies
In this paper, we will be concerned with entropic quantities of classical type [17, 33, 61]. We express them
in ‘bits’, that is we use the base-2 logarithms: log a ≡ log2 a.
We deal only with probabilities on the measurable space Rn , B(Rn ) which admit densities with
respect to the Lebesgue measure. So, we define the relative entropy and differential entropy only for such
probabilities; moreover, we list only the general properties used in the following.
9
G
3.1 Relative entropy or Kullback-Leibler divergence
The fundamental quantity is the relative entropy, also called information divergence, discrimination information, Kullback-Leibler divergence or information or distance or discrepancy. The relative entropy of
a probability p with respect to a probability q is defined for any couple of probabilities p, q on the same
probability space.
Given two probabilities p and q on (Rn , B(Rn )) with densities f and g, respectively, the relative
entropy of p with respect to q is
Z
f (x)
dx.
(33)
S(pkq) =
f (x) log
g(x)
n
R
The value +∞ is allowed for S(pkq); the usual convention 0 log(0/0) = 0 is understood. The relative
entropy (33) is the amount of information that is lost when q is used to approximate p [17, p. 51]. Of
course, if x is dimensioned, then the densities f and g have the same dimension (that is, the inverse of x),
and the argument of the logarithm is dimensionless, as it must be.
Proposition 7 ( [33], Theorem 8.6.1). The following properties hold.
(i) S(pkq) ≥ 0.
(ii) S(pkq) = 0
⇐⇒
p=q
⇐⇒
f =g
a.e..
(iii) S(pkq) is invariant under a change of the unit of measurement.
(iv) If p = N (a; A) and q = N (b; B) with invertible variance matrices A and B, then
(
)
−1
det B
−1
2 S(pkq) = (log e) (a − b) · B (a − b) + Tr B A − 1
.
+ log
det A
(34)
As S(pkq) is scale invariant, it quantifies a relative error for the use of q as an approximation of p, not
an absolute one.
Let us employ the relative entropy to evaluate the effect of an additive Gaussian noise ν ∼ N (b; β 2 )
on an independent Gaussian random variable X. If X ∼ N (a; α2 ), then X + ν ∼ N (a + b; α2 + β 2 ), and
the relative entropy of the true distribution of X with respect to its disturbed version X + ν is
S(XkX + ν) =
1
α2 + β 2
log e b2 − β 2
+ log
.
2
2
2 α +β
2
α2
This expression vanishes if the noise becomes negligible with respect to the true distribution, that is if
β 2 /α2 → 0 and b2 /α2 → 0. On the other hand, S(XkX + ν) diverges if the noise becomes too strong
with respect to the true distribution, or, in other words, if the true distribution becomes too peaked with
respect to the noise, that is, β 2 /α2 → +∞ or b2 /α2 → +∞.
3.2 Differential entropy
The differential entropy of an absolutely continuous random vector X with a probability density f is
Z
H(X) := −
f (x) log f (x)dx.
Rn
This quantity is commonly used in the literature, even if it lacks many of the nice properties of the Shannon
entropy for discrete random variables. For example, H(X) is not scale invariant, and it can be negative [33,
p. 244].
Since the density f enters in the logarithm argument, the definition of H(X) is meaningful only when
f is dimensionless, which is the same as X being dimensionless. Note that, if X is dimensioned and c > 0
f = cX a dimensionless random variable, then
is a real parameter making X
Z
Z
f (u/c)
f (x)
f (u/c)
f =−
H(X)
f (x) log n dx .
log
du
=
−
n
n
c
c
c
Rn
Rn
In the following, we shall consider the differential entropy only for dimensionless random vectors X.
10
Proposition 8 ( [33], Section 8.6). The following properties hold.
(i) If X is an absolutely continuous random vector with variance matrix A, then
n
1
1
H(X) ≤ log (2πe)n det A = log (2πe) + Tr log A.
2
2
2
The equality holds iff X is Gaussian with variance matrix A and arbitrary mean vector a.
(ii) If X = (X1 , . . . , Xn ) is an absolutely continuous random vector, then
H(X) ≤
n
X
H(Xi ).
i=1
The equality holds iff the components X1 , . . . , Xn are independent.
Remark 1. In property (i) we have used the following well-known matrix identity, which follows by diagonalization:
log det A = Tr log A,
∀A > 0.
Remark 2. Property (i) yields that the differential entropy of a Gaussian random variable X ∼ N (a; α2 ) is
H(X) =
1
log 2πeα2 ,
2
which is an increasing function of the variance α2 , and thus it is a measure of the uncertainty of X. Note
that H(X) ≥ 0 iff α2 ≥ 1/(2πe).
4 Entropic PURs for position and momentum
The idea of having an entropic formulation of the PURs for position and momentum goes back to [12, 14,
41]. However, we have just seen that, due to the presence of the logarithm, the Shannon differential entropy
needs dimensionless probability densities. So, this leads us to introduce dimensionless versions of position
and momentum.
Let λ > 0 be a dimensionless parameter and κ a second parameter with the dimension of a mass times
a frequency. Then, we introduce the dimensionless versions of position and momentum:
r
i
h
λ
κ
e
e i , Pej = iλδij .
Q,
Pe = √
(35)
P
⇒
Q
Q :=
~
~κ
We use a unique dimensional constant κ, in order to respect rotation symmetry and do not distinguish
different particles. Anyway, there is no natural link between the parameter multiplying Q and the parameter
multiplying P ; this is the reason for introducing λ. As we see from the commutation rules, the constant λ
plays the role of a dimensionless version of ~; in the literature on PURs, often λ = 1 is used [12, 14, 31].
4.1 Vector observables
e and P
e be the pvm’s of Q
e ρ and P
e ρ are their probability distributions in the state ρ.
e and Pe ; then, Q
Let Q
e ρ )+H(P
e ρ ).
The total preparation uncertainty is quantified by the sum of the two differential entropies H(Q
For ρ ∈ G, by Proposition 8 we get
n
1
4
ρ
ρ
e
e
H(Qρ ) + H(Pρ ) = n log (πeλ) + log
(det A ) (det B ) .
(36)
2
~2
n
In the case of product states of minimum uncertainty, we have (det Aρ ) (det B ρ ) = ~2 /4 ; then, by
taking (20) into account, we get
n
o
e ρ ) + H(P
e ρ ) = n log (πeλ) .
inf H(Q
(37)
ρ∈G
11
Thus, the bound (37) arises from quantum relations between Q and P ; indeed, there would be no lower
bound for (36) if we could take both det Aρ and det B ρ arbitrarily small.
By item (ii) of Proposition 8, the differential entropy for the distribution of a random vector is smaller
than the sum of the entropies of its marginals; however, the final bound (37) is a tight bound for both
e ρ ) + H(P
e ρ ) and Pn H(Q
e i,ρ ) + Pn H(P
e i,ρ ).
H(Q
i=1
i=1
By the results of [12, 14], the same bound (37) is obtained even if the minimization is done over all the
states, not only the Gaussian ones.
The uncertainty result (37) depends on λ, this being a consequence of the lack of scale invariance
of the differential entropy; note that the bound is positive if and only if λ > 1/(πe). Sometimes in the
literature the parameter ~ appears in the argument of the logarithm [19, 32]; this fact has to be interpreted
as the appearance of a parameter with the numerical value of ~, but without dimensions. In this sense the
formulation (37) is consistent with both the cases with λ = 1 or λ = ~. Sometimes the smaller bound
ln 2π appears in place of log πe [50]; this is connected to a state dependent formulation of the entropic
PUR [31, Sect. V.B].
4.2 Scalar observables
The dimensionless versions of the scalar observables introduced in (6) are
r
i
h
λ
e u , Pev = iλ cos α.
e u = κ Qu ,
Pv ⇒
Q
Q
Pev = √
~
~κ
(38)
e u,ρ and P
e v,ρ the associated distributions in the state ρ. For ρ ∈ S2 , the respective means
We denote by Q
and variances are
r
2
λ
κ
e v,ρ ) = λ v · B ρ v,
e u,ρ ) = κ u · Aρ u,
√
u · aρ ,
Var(P
v · bρ ,
Var(Q
~
~
~κ
~κ
q
e u,ρ ) Var(P
e v,ρ ) ≥ λ |cos α| /2.
with Var(Q
As in the vector case, the total preparation uncertainty is quantified by the sum of the two differential
e u,ρ ) + H(P
e v,ρ ). For ρ ∈ G, Proposition 8 gives
entropies H(Q
q
e
e
e
e
(39)
H(Qu,ρ ) + H(Pv,ρ ) = log 2πe Var(Qu,ρ ) Var(Pv,ρ ) .
Then, we have the lower bound
inf
ρ∈G
n
o
e u,ρ ) + H(P
e v,ρ ) = log (πeλ |cos α|) = 1 + ln (π |λ cos α|) ,
H(Q
ln 2
(40)
which depends on λ, but not on κ. Of course, because of (39), for Gaussian states a lower bound for the
e u,ρ ) + H(P
e v,ρ ) is equivalent to a lower bound for the product Var(Q
e u,ρ ) Var(P
e v,ρ ). By a slight
sum H(Q
generalization of the results of [12,14], the bound (40) is obtained also when the minimization is done over
all the states.
Let us note that the bound in (40) is positive for |λ cos α| > 1/(πe), and it goes to −∞ for α → π/2,
which is the case of compatible Qu,ρ and Pv,ρ . In the case α = 0, the bound (40) is the same as (37) for
n = 1.
5 Approximate joint measurements of position and momentum
In order to deal with MURs for position and momentum observables, we have to introduce the class of
approximate joint measurements of position and momentum, whose marginals we will compare with the
respective sharp observables. As done in [21,28,44,45], it is natural to characterize such a class by requiring
suitable properties of covariance under the group of space translations and velocity boosts: namely, by
12
approximate joint measurement of position and momentum we will mean any POVM on the product space
of the position and momentum outcomes sharing the same covariance properties of the two target sharp
observables. As we have already discussed, two approximation problems will be of our concern: the
approximation of the position and momentum vectors (vector case, with outcomes in the phase-space Rn ×
Rn ), and the approximation of one position and one momentum component along two arbitrary directions
(scalar case, with oucomes in R × R). In order to treat the two cases altogether, we consider POVMs with
outcomes in Rm × Rm ≡ R2m , which we call bi-observables; they correspond to a measurement of m
position components and m momentum components. The specific covariance requirements will be given
in the Definitions 5, 6, 7.
In studying the properties of probability measures on Rk , a very useful notion is that of the characteristic
function, that is, the Fourier cotransform of the measure at hand; the analogous quantity for POVMs turns
out to have the same relevance. Different names have been used in the literature to refer to the characteristic
function of POVMs, or, more generally, quantum instruments, such as characteristic operator or operator
characteristic function [1, 3–6, 42–44, 49]. As a variant, also the symplectic Fourier transform quite often
appears [46, Sect. 12.4.3]. The characteristic function has been used, for instance, to study the quantum
analogues of the infinite-divisible distributions [3–6,43,44] and measurements of Gaussian type [42,46,49].
Here, we are interested only in the latter application, as our approximating bi-observables will typically be
Gaussian. Since we deal with bi-observables, we limit our definition of the characteristic function only to
POVMs on Rm × Rm , which have the same number of variables of position and momentum type.
Being measures, POVMs can be used to construct integrals, whose theory is presented e.g. in [23,
Sect. 4.8], [45, Sect. 2.9, Prop. 2.9.1].
Definition 4. Given a bi-observable M : B(R2m ) → L(H), the characteristic function of M is the operator
b : R2m → L(H), with
valued function M
Z
b
ei(k·x+l·p) M(dxdp).
(41)
M(k, l) =
R2m
Here, the dimensions of the vector variables k and l are the inverses of a length and momentum,
respectively,
as
o in the definition of the characteristic function of a state (27). This definition is given so that
n
b
Tr M(k, l)ρ is the usual characteristic function of the probability distribution Mρ on R2m .
5.1 Covariant vector observables
In terms of the pvm’s (4), the translation property (25) is equivalent to the symmetry properties
W (x, p)Q(A)W (x, p)∗ = Q(A + x),
W (x, p)P(B)W (x, p)∗ = P(B + p),
∀A, B ∈ B(Rn ),
and they are taken as the transformation property defining the following class of POVMs on R2n [20, 23,
28, 49, 64].
Definition 5. A covariant phase-space observable is a bi-observable M : B(R2n ) → L(H) satisfying the
covariance relation
x
∗
W (x, p)M(Z)W (x, p) = M Z +
,
∀Z ∈ B(R2n ), ∀x, p ∈ Rn .
p
We denote by C the set of all the covariant phase-space observables.
C
The interpretation of covariant phase-space observables as approximate joint measurements of position
and momentum is based on the fact that their marginal POVMs
M1 (A) = M(A × Rn ),
M2 (B) = M(Rn × B),
A, B ∈ B(Rn ),
have the same symmetry properties of Q and P, respectively. Although Q and P are not jointly measurable,
the following well-known result says that there are plenty of covariant phase-space observables [30, 48],
[45, Theor. 4.8.3]. In (43) below, we use the parity operator Π on H, which is such that
Π W (x, p) Π = W (−x, −p) = W (x, p)∗ .
13
(42)
Proposition 9. The covariant phase-space observables are in one-to-one correspondence with the states
on H, so that we have the identification S ∼ C; such a correspondence σ ↔ Mσ is given by
Z
σ
M σ (x, p) dxdp,
∀B ∈ B(R2n ),
M (B) =
B
(43)
1
∗
M σ (x, p) =
W
(x,
p)ΠσΠW
(x,
p)
.
(2π~)n
The characteristic function (41) of a measurement Mσ ∈ C has a very simple structure in terms of the
characteristic function (27) of the corresponding state σ ∈ S.
Proposition 10. The characteristic function of Mσ ∈ C is given by
k
b σ (k, l) = W (−Ωw) σ
M
b(w),
w≡
∈ R2n ,
l
(44)
and the characteristic function of the probability Mσρ is
n
o
b σ (k, l)ρ = ρb(w)b
Tr M
σ (w).
(45)
In (44) we have used the identification (26). The characteristic function of a state is introduced in (27).
Proof. By the commutation relations (24), we have
W (−~l, ~k)W (x, p)W (−~l, ~k)∗ = ei(k·x+l·p) W (x, p).
Then, we get
Z
1
ei(k·x+l·p) W (x, p)ΠσΠW (x, p)∗ dxdp
(2π~)n R2n
Z
1
W (−~l, ~k)W (x, p)W (−~l, ~k)∗ ΠσΠW (x, p)∗ dxdp
=
(2π~)n R2n
∗
= W (−~l, ~k) Tr{W (−~l, ~k) ΠσΠ},
b σ (k, l) =
M
where we have used formula (29). By (42) and definition (27), we get (44). Again by (27), we get (45).
In terms of probability densities, measuring Mσ on the state ρ yields the density function hσ (x, p|ρ) =
Tr{M σ (x, p)ρ}. Then, by (45), the densities of the marginals Mσ1,ρ and Mσ2 ρ are the convolutions
hσ1 (•|ρ) = f (•|ρ) ∗ f (•|σ),
hσ2 (•|ρ) = g(•|ρ) ∗ g(•|σ),
(46)
where f and g are the sharp densities introduced in (5). By the arbitrariness of the state ρ, the marginal
POVMs of Mσ turn out to be the convolutions (or ‘smearings’)
Z
Z
Z
Z
g(p − p′ |σ)P(dp′ )
dp
f (x − x′ |σ)Q(dx′ ),
Mσ2 (B)
dx
Mσ1 (A)
A
Rn
B
Rn
(see e.g. [20, Sect. III, Eqs. (2.48), (2.49)]).
Let us remark that the distribution of the approximate position observable Mσ1 in a state ρ is the distribution of the sum of two independent random vectors: the first one is distributed as the sharp position Q in
the state ρ, the second one is distributed as the sharp position Q in the state σ. In this sense, the approximate position Mσ1 looks like a sharp position plus an independent noise given by σ. Of course, a similar
fact holds for the momentum. However, this statement about the distributions can not be extended to a
statement involving the observables. Indeed, since Q and P are incompatible, nobody can jointly observe
Mσ , Q and P, so that the convolutions (46) do not correspond to sums of random vectors that actually exist
when measuring Mσ .
14
5.2 Covariant scalar observables
Now we focus on the class of approximate joint measurements of the observables Qu and Pv representing
position and momentum along two possibly different directions u and v (see Section 2.1.2). As in the case
of covariant phase-space observables, this class is defined in terms of the symmetries of its elements: we
require them to transform as if they were joint measurements of Qu and Pv . Recall that Qu and Pv denote
the spectral measures of Qu , Pv .
Due to the commutation relation (24), the following covariance relations hold
∗
∗
W (x, p)Qu (A)W (x, p) = Qu (A + u · x),
W (x, p)Pv (B)W (x, p) = Pv (B + v · p),
for all A, B ∈ B(R) and x, p ∈ Rn . We employ covariance to define our class of approximate joint
measurements of Qu and Pv .
Definition 6. A (u, v)-covariant bi-observable is a POVM M : B(R2 ) → L(H) such that
u·x
∗
W (x, p)M(Z)W (x, p) = M Z +
,
∀Z ∈ B(R2 ), ∀x, p ∈ Rn .
v·p
We denote by Cu,v the class of such bi-observables.
Cu,v
So, our approximate joint measurements of Qu and Pv will be all the bi-observables in the class Cu,v .
Example 1. The marginal of a covariant phase-space observable M σ along the directions u and v is a
(u, v)-covariant bi-observable. Actually, it can be proved that, if cos α 6= 0, all (u, v)-covariant biobservables can be obtained in this way.
It is useful to work with a little more generality, and merge Definitions 5 and 6 into a single notion of
covariance.
Definition 7. Suppose J is a k×2n real matrix. A POVM M : B(Rk ) → L(H) is a J-covariant observable
on Rk if
x
∗
W (x, p)M(Z)W (x, p) = M Z + J
,
∀Z ∈ B(Rk ),
∀x, p ∈ Rn .
p
Thus, approximate joint observables of Qu and Pv are just J-covariant observables on R2 for the choice
of the 2 × 2n matrix
T
u
0T
J=
.
(47)
0T v T
On the other hand, covariant phase-space observables constitute the class of 12n -covariant observables on
R2n , where 12n is the identity map of R2n .
5.3 Gaussian measurements
When dealing with Gaussian states, the following class of bi-observables quite naturally arises.
Definition 8. A POVM M : B(R2m ) → L(H) is a Gaussian bi-observable if
aM
1 T
k
M T
T
T
b
k
l
−
exp i k
M(k, l) = W −Ω(J )
l
bM
2
l
T
V
M
k
l
(48)
for two vectors aM , bM ∈ Rm , a real 2m × 2n matrix J M and a real symmetric 2m × 2m matrix V M
satisfying the condition
i
(49)
V M ± J M Ω(J M )T ≥ 0.
2
M
a
We set µM =
. The triple (µM , V M , J M ) is the set of the parameters of the Gaussian observable M.
bM
15
In this definition, the vector aM has the dimension of a length, and bM of a momentum; similarly, the
matrices J M , V M decompose into blocks of different dimensions. The condition (49) is necessary and
sufficient in order that the function (48) defines the characteristic function of a POVM.
For unbiased Gaussian measurements, i.e., Gaussian bi-observables with aM = bM = 0, the previous
definition coincides with the one of [46, Section 12.4.3]. It is also a particular case of the more general
definition of Gaussian observables on arbitrary (not necessarily symplectic) linear spaces that is given
in [36,49]. We refer to [46,49] for the proof that Eq. (48) is actually the characteristic function of a POVM.
Measuring the Gaussian observable M on the Gaussian state ρ yields the probability distribution Mρ
whose characteristic function is
aM
M k
1 T
k
T
b
k
l
−
exp i kT lT
Tr{M(k,
l)ρ} = ρb (J M )T
V
bM
l
l
2
ρ
M
k
1 T
a
M
M ρ
M T
M a
T
k
l
;
V
+
J
V
(J
)
−
+
J
= exp i kT lT
l
bρ
bM
2
hence the output distribution is Gaussian,
Mρ = N J M µρ + µM ; J M V ρ (J M )T + V M .
(50)
5.3.1 Covariant Gaussian observables
For Gaussian bi-observables, J-covariance has a very easy characterization.
Proposition 11. Suppose M is a Gaussian bi-observable on R2m with parameters (µM , V M , J M ). Let J
be any 2m × 2n real matrix. Then, the POVM M is a J-covariant observable if and only if J M = J.
Proof. For x, p ∈ Rn , we let M′ and M′′ be the two POVMs on R2m given by
x
∗
′
′′
M (Z) = W (x, p)M(Z)W (x, p) ,
M (Z) = M Z + J
,
p
∀Z ∈ B(R2m ).
By the commutation relations (24) for the Weyl operators, we immediately get
b ′ (k, l) = W (x, p)M(k,
b
M
l)W (x, p)∗ = exp −i xT
we have also
b ′′ (k, l) =
M
Z
R2m
exp i kT
lT
k
b
pT Ω−1 −Ω(J M )T
M(k,
l)
l
x
b
= exp −i kT lT J M
M(k,
l);
p
′
x
x
−
J
M(dx′ dp′ )
p′
p
= exp −i kT
x
b
lT J
M(k,
l).
p
b
Since M(k,
l) 6= 0 for all k, l, by comparing the last two expressions we see that M′ = M′′ if and only if
M x
x
T
T
T
T
l J
l J
= exp −i k
exp −i k
,
∀x, p ∈ Rn , ∀k, l ∈ Rm ,
p
p
which in turn is equivalent to J M = J.
Vector observables
Let us point out the structure of the Gaussian approximate joint measurements of Q and P.
16
Proposition 12. A bi-observable Mσ ∈ C is Gaussian if and only if the state σ is Gaussian. In this case,
the covariant bi-observable Mσ is Gaussian with parameters
σ
µM = µσ ,
J M = 12n .
σ
σ
V M = V σ,
Proof. By comparing (31), (44) and (48), and using the fact that W (x1 , p2 ) ∝ W (x2 , p2 ) if and only if
x1 = x2 and p1 = p2 , we have the first statement. Then, for σ ∈ G, we see immediately that Mσ is a
Gaussian observable with the above parameters.
We call CG the class of the Gaussian covariant phase-space observables. By (50), observing Mσ on
a Gaussian state ρ ∈ G yields the normal probability distribution Mσρ = N (µρ + µσ ; V ρ + V σ ), with
marginals
Mσ1,ρ = N (aρ + aσ ; Aρ + Aσ ),
Mσ2,ρ = N (bρ + bσ ; B ρ + B σ ).
(51)
CG
When aσ = 0 and bσ = 0, we have an unbiased measurement.
Scalar observables
We now study the Gaussian approximate joint measurements of the target observables Qu and Pu defined
in (6).
Proposition 13. A Gaussian bi-observable M with parameters (µM , V M , J M ) is in Cu,v if and only if
J M = J, where J is given by (47). In this case, the condition (49) is equivalent to
M
V11
≥ 0,
M
V22
≥ 0,
M M
V11
V22 ≥
~2
M 2
(cos α)2 + (V12
) .
4
(52)
Proof. The first statement follows from Proposition 11. Then, the matrix inequality (49) reads
i~
0
cos α
M
≥ 0,
V ±
0
2 − cos α
which is equivalent to (52).
We write CG
u,v for the class of the Gaussian (u, v)-covariant phase-space observables. An observM
M
M
able M ∈ CG
= J given by
u,v is thus characterized by the couple (µ , V ). From (50) with J
G
(47), we get that measuring M ∈ Cu,v on a Gaussian state ρ yields the probability distribution Mρ =
ρ
N µρu,v + µM ; Vu,v
+ V M . Its marginals with respect to the first and second entry are, respectively,
M
,
M1,ρ = N u · aρ + aM ; Var(Qu,ρ ) + V11
M
.
M2,ρ = N v · bρ + bM ; Var(Pv,ρ ) + V22
(53)
Example 2. Let us construct an example of an approximate joint measurement of Qu and Pv , by using a
noisy measurement of position along u followed by a sharp measurement of momentum along v. Let ∆
be a positive real number yielding the precision of the position measurement, and consider the POVM M
on R2 given by
Z
(x − Qu )2
1
(x − Qu )2
Pv (B) exp −
dx,
∀A, B ∈ B(R).
M(A × B) = √
exp −
4∆
4∆
2π∆ A
17
CG
u,v
The characteristic function of M is
Z
Z
(x − Qu )2
(x − Qu )2
1
ilp
ikx
b
dx
e Pv (dp) exp −
e exp −
M(k, l) = √
4∆
4∆
2π∆ R
R
Z
1
(x − Qu )2
(x − Qu )2
=√
eilPv exp −
dx
exp ikx −
4∆
4∆
2π∆ R
Z
(x − Qu )2
eilPv
(x − Qu + ~lu · v)2
exp −
dx
=√
exp ikx −
4∆
4∆
2π∆ R
Z
1
(~l cos α)2
(x − Qu + ~l cos α/2)2
=√
dx
exp ilPv −
exp ikx −
8∆
2∆
2π∆
R
~l cos α
∆
(~ cos α)2 2
= exp ilPv + ik Qu +
− k2 −
l
2
2
8∆
∆ 2 (~ cos α)2 2
= W (−~lv, ~ku) exp − k −
l .
2
8∆
Therefore, M is a Gaussian bi-observable with parameters aM = 0, bM = 0 and J M = J, where J is given
α)2
M
M
M
G
by (47) and V11
= ∆, V22
= (~ cos
and V12
= 0. This implies M ∈ CG
u,v ; in particular, the set Cu,v is
4∆
M M
non-empty. Moreover, the lower bound V11
V22 =
~2
2
4 (cos α)
is attained, cf. (52).
Example 3. Let us consider the case α = ±π/2; now the target observables Qu and Pv are compatible and
we can define a pvm M on R2 by setting M(A×B) = Qu (A)Pv (B) for all A, B ∈ B(R). Its characteristic
function is
Z
Z
ikx
b
e Qu (dx) eilp Pv (dp) = ei(kQu +lPv ) = W (−~lv, ~ku).
M(k, l) =
R
R
M
M
M
Then, M ∈ CG
= 0 and J M = J given by (47). Note that M can
u,v with parameters a = 0, b = 0, V
be regarded as the limit case of the observables of the previous example when cos α = 0 and ∆ ↓ 0.
6 Entropic MURs for position and momentum
In the case of two discrete target observables, in [2] we found an entropic bound for the precision of their
approximate joint measurements, which we named entropic incompatibility degree. Its definition followed
a three steps procedure. Firstly, we introduced an error function: when the system is in a given state ρ, such
a function quantifies the total amount of information that is lost by approximating the target observables by
means of the marginals of a bi-observable; the error function is nothing else than the sum of the two relative
entropies of the respective distributions. Then, we considered the worst possible case by maximizing
the error function over ρ, thus obtaining an entropic divergence quantifying the approximation error in a
state independent way. Finally, we got our index of the incompatibility of the two target observables by
minimizing the entropic divergence over all bi-observables. In particular, when symmetries are present,
we showed that the minimum is attained at some covariant bi-observables. So, the covariance followed as
a byproduct of the optimization procedure, and was not a priori imposed upon the class of approximating
bi-observables.
As we shall see, the extension of the previous procedure to position and momentum target observables
is not straightforward, and peculiar problems of the continuous case arise. In order to overcome them,
in this paper we shall fully analyse only a case in which explicit computations can be done: Gaussian
preparations, and Gaussian bi-observables, which we a priori assume to be covariant. We conjecture that
the final result should be independent of these simplifications, as we shall discuss in Section 7.
As we said in Section 5, by “approximate joint measurement” we mean “a bi-observable with the ‘right’
covariance properties”.
18
6.1 Scalar observables
Given the directions u and v, the target observables are Qu and Pv in (6) with pvm’s Qu and Pv . For ρ ∈ G
with parameters (µρ , V ρ ) given in (12), the target distributions Qu,ρ and Pv,ρ are normal with means and
variances (11).
An approximate joint measurements of Qu and Pv is given by a covariant bi-observable M ∈ Cu,v ;
then, we denote its marginals with respect to the first and second entry by M1 and M2 , respectively. For a
M
M
Gaussian covariant bi-observable M ∈ CG
u,v with parameters (µ , V ), the distribution of M in a Gaussian
state ρ is normal,
ρ
Mρ = N µρ + µM ; Vu,v
+VM ,
so that its marginal distributions M1,ρ and M2,ρ are normal with means u · aρ + aM and v · bρ + bM and
variances
M
M
Var (M1,ρ ) = Var (Qu,ρ ) + V11
,
Var (M2,ρ ) = Var (Pv,ρ ) + V22
.
(54)
Let us recall that |u| = 1, |v| = 1, u · v = cos α, and that by (16) and (52), we have
Var (Qu,ρ ) Var (Pv,ρ ) ≥
~2
2
(cos α) ,
4
M M
V11
V22 ≥
~2
2
(cos α) .
4
(55)
6.1.1 Error function
The relative entropy is the amount of information that is lost when an approximating distribution is used
in place of a target one. For this reason, we use it to give an informational quantification of the error made
in approximating the distributions of sharp position and momentum by means of the marginals of a joint
covariant observable.
Definition 9. Given the preparation ρ ∈ S and the covariant bi-observable M ∈ Cu,v , the error function
for the scalar case is the sum of the two relative entropies:
S(ρ, M) := S(Qu,ρ kM1,ρ ) + S(Pv,ρ kM2,ρ ).
(56)
The relative entropy is invariant under a change of the unit of measurement, so that the error function
is scale invariant, too; indeed, it quantifies a relative error, not an absolute one. In the Gaussian case the
error function can be explicitly computed.
Proposition 14 (Error function for the scalar Gaussian case). For ρ ∈ G and M ∈ CG
u,v , the error function
is
log e
S(ρ, M) =
[s(x) + s(y) + ∆(ρ, M)] ,
(57)
2
where
x :=
M
V11
,
Var (Qu,ρ )
y :=
M
V22
,
Var (Pv,ρ )
∆(ρ, M) :=
(aM )2
(bM )2
+
,
Var (M1,ρ ) Var (M2,ρ )
and s : [0, +∞) → [0, +∞) is the following C ∞ strictly increasing function with s(0) = 0:
s(x) := ln (1 + x) −
x
.
1+x
(58)
Proof. The statement follows by a straightforward combination of (32), (34), (53) and (56).
M
Note that the error function does not depend on the mixed covariances u · C ρ v and V12
. Note also
that, if we select a possible approximation M, then the error function S(ρ, M) decreases for states ρ with
increasing sharp variances Var (Qu,ρ ) and Var (Pv,ρ ): the loss of information decreases when the sharp
distributions make the approximation error negligible. Finally, note that
s(x) + s(y) = ln[(1 + x)(1 + y)] + (1 + x)−1 + (1 + y)−1 − 2,
19
1+x=
Var (M1,ρ )
,
Var (Qu,ρ )
1+y =
Var (M2,ρ )
.
Var (Pv,ρ )
This means that, apart from the term ∆(ρ, M) due to the bias, our error function S(ρ, M) only depends on
the two ratios “variance of the approximating distribution over variance of the target distribution”. Thus,
in order to optimize the error function, one has to optimize these two ratios. We use formula (57) to firstly
give a state dependent MUR, and then, following the scheme of [2], a state independent MUR.
A lower bound for the error function can be found by minimizing it over all possible approximate joint
measurements of Qu and Pv . First of all, let us remark that this minimization makes sense because we
consider only (u, v)-covariant bi-observables: if we minimized over all possible bi-observables, then the
minimum would be trivially zero for every given preparation ρ. Indeed, the trivial bi-observable M(A ×
B) = Qu,ρ (A)Pv,ρ (B) 1 yields S(ρ, M) = 0.
When minimizing the error function over all (u, v)-covariant bi-observables, both the minimum and the
best measurement attaining it are state dependent. When α = ±π/2, the two target observables are compatible, so that their joint measurement trivially exists (see Example 3) and we get inf M∈Cu,v S(ρ, M) = 0.
In order to have explicit results for any angle α, we consider only the Gaussian case.
Theorem 15 (State dependent MUR, scalar observables). For every ρ ∈ G and M ∈ CG
u,v ,
S(Qu,ρ kM1,ρ ) + S(Pv,ρ kM2,ρ ) ≥ cρ (α),
(59)
where the lower bound is
cρ (α) = s (zρ ) log e
(
with
~| cos α|
= (log e) ln 1 + p
2 Var (Qu,ρ ) Var (Pv,ρ )
!
~| cos α|
p
−
~| cos α| + 2 Var (Qu,ρ ) Var (Pv,ρ )
~ |cos α|
zρ := p
∈ [0, 1].
2 Var (Qu,ρ ) Var (Pv,ρ )
)
,
(60)
(61)
The lower bound is tight and the optimal measurement is unique: cρ (α) = S(ρ, M∗ ), for a unique M∗ ∈
CG
u,v ; such a Gaussian (u, v)-covariant bi-observable is characterized by
µ
M∗
= 0,
M∗
V12
= 0,
M∗
V11
~
=
2
s
Var (Qu,ρ )
|cos α| ,
Var (Pv,ρ )
M∗
V22
~
=
2
s
Var (Pv,ρ )
|cos α| . (62)
Var (Qu,ρ )
Proof. As already discussed, the case cos α = 0 is trivial. If cos α 6= 0, we have to minimize the error
function (57) over M. First of all we can eliminate the positive term ∆(ρ, M) by taking an unbiased
measurement. Then, since s is an increasing function, by the second condition in (55) we can also take
2
2
M∗
M∗
M∗
= 0 by (52). In this case the error function (57) reduces to
V11
V22
= ~4 (cos α) . This implies V12
S(ρ, M∗ ) =
log e
s(x) + s(zρ2 /x) ,
2
x=
M∗
V11
,
Var (Qu,ρ )
with zρ given by (61); by the first of (55), we have zρ ∈ (0, 1].
Now, we can minimize the error function with respect to x by studying its first derivative:
zρ4
x2 − zρ2 x2 + 2zρ2 x + zρ2
x
d
2
s(x) + s(zρ /x) =
−
=
.
2
2
dx
(1 + x)2
x(zρ2 + x)2
x z 2 + x (1 + x)
ρ
Having x > 0, we immediately get that x = zρ gives the unique minimum. Thus
S(ρ, M) ≥ S(ρ, M∗ ) = s(zρ ) log e = log(1 + zρ ) −
20
zρ
log e,
1 + zρ
and
M∗
V11
~
= zρ Var (Qu,ρ ) ≡
2
s
Var (Qu,ρ )
|cos α| ,
Var (Pv,ρ )
M∗
V22
~
= zρ Var (Pv,ρ ) ≡
2
s
Var (Pv,ρ )
|cos α| ,
Var (Qu,ρ )
which conclude the proof.
Remark 3. The minimum information loss cρ (α) depends on both the preparation ρ and the angle α. When
α 6= ±π/2, that is when the target observables are not compatible, cρ (α) is strictly grater than zero. This
is a peculiar quantum effect: given ρ, u and v, there is no Gaussian approximate joint measurement of Qu
and Pv that can approximate them arbitrarily well. On the other side, in the limit α → ±π/2, the lower
bound cρ (α) goes to zero; so, the case of commuting target observables is approached with continuity.
Remark 4. The lower bound cρ (α) goes to zero also in the classical limit ~ → 0. This holds for every
angle α and every Gaussian state ρ.
Remark 5. Another case in which cρ (α) → 0 is the limit of large uncertainty states, that is, if we let
the product Var (Qu,ρ ) Var (Pv,ρ ) → ∞: our entropic MUR disappears because, roughly speaking, the
variance of (at least) one of the two target observables goes to infinity, its relative entropy vanishes by itself,
and an optimal covariant bi-observable M∗ has to take care of (at most) only the other target observable.
Remark 6. Actually, something similar to the previous remark happens also at the macroscopic limit, and
does not require the measuring instrument to be an optimal one; indeed, unbiasedness is enough in this
case. This happens because the error function S(ρ, M) quantifies a relative error; even if the measurement
approximation M is fixed, such an error can be reduced by suitably changing the preparation ρ. Indeed,
if we consider the position and momentum of a macroscopic particle, for instance the center of mass of
many particles, it is natural that its state has much larger position and momentum uncertainties than the
VM
VM
intrinsic uncertainties of the measuring instrument; that is, Var(Q11u,ρ ) ≪ 1 and Var(P22v,ρ ) ≪ 1, implying
that the error function (57) is negligible. In practice, this is a classical case: the preparation has large
position and momentum uncertainties and the measuring instrument is relatively good. In this situation
we do not see the difference between the joint measurement of position and momentum and their separate
sharp observations.
Remark 7. The optimal approximating joint measurement M∗ ∈ CG
u,v is unique; by (62) it depends on the
preparation ρ one is considering, as well as on the directions u and v. A realization of M∗ is the measuring
procedure of Example 2.
Remark 8. The MUR (59) is scale invariant, as both the error function S(ρ, M) and the lower bound cρ (α)
are such.
Remark 9. For cos α 6= 0, we get inf M∈CG
S(ρ, M) = s(zρ ) log e, where zρ is defined by (61). As zρ
u,v
i
log e
,
ranges in the interval (0, 1], the quantity inf M∈CG
S(ρ,
M)
takes
all
the
values
in
the
interval
0,
1
−
2
u,v
so that
log e
.
(63)
sup inf S(ρ, M) = 1 −
2
ρ∈G M∈CG
u,v
In order to get this result, we needed cos α 6= 0; however, the final result does not depend on α. Therefore,
in the supρ inf M -approach of (63), the continuity from quantum to classical is lost.
6.1.2 Entropic divergence of Qu , Pv from M
Now we want to find an entropic quantification of the error made in observing M ∈ Cu,v as an approximation of Qu and Pv in an arbitrary state ρ. The procedure of [2], already suggested in [25, Sect. VI.C] for
a different error function, is to consider the worst case by maximizing the error function over all the states.
However, in the continuous framework this is not possible for the error function (56); indeed, from (57) we
get supρ∈G S(ρ, M) = +∞ even if we restrict to unbiased covariant bi-observables.
Anyway, the reason for S(ρ, M) to diverge is classical: it depends only on the continuous nature of Qu
and Pv , without any relation to their (quantum) incompatibility. Indeed, as we noted in Section 3.1, if an
21
instrument measuring a random variable X ∼ N (a; α2 ) adds an independent noise ν ∼ N (b; β 2 ), thus
producing an output X + ν ∼ N (a + b; α2 + β 2 ), then the relative entropy S(XkX + ν) diverges for
α2 → 0; this is what happens if we fix the noise and we allow for arbitrarily peaked preparations. Thus,
the sum S(Qu,ρ kM1,ρ ) + S(Pv,ρ kM2,ρ ) diverges if, fixed M, we let Var(Qu,ρ ) or Var(Pv,ρ ) go to 0.
The difference between the classical and quantum frameworks emerges if we bound from below the
variances of the sharp position and momentum observables. Indeed, in the classical framework we have
inf b,β 2 supα2 ≥ǫ S(XkX + ν) = 0 for every ǫ > 0; the same holds for the sum of two relative entropies if
no relation exists between the two noises. On the contrary, in the quantum framework the entropic MURs
appear due to the relation between the position and momentum errors occurring in any approximate joint
measurement.
In order to avoid that S(ρ, M) → +∞ due to merely classical effects, we thus introduce the following
subset of the Gaussian states:
Gu,v
:= {ρ ∈ G : Var (Qu,ρ ) ≥ ǫ1 , Var (Pv,ρ ) ≥ ǫ2 } ,
ǫ
ǫi > 0,
(64)
and we evaluate the error made in approximating Qu and Pv with the marginals of a (u, v)-covariant
bi-observable by maximizing the error function over all these states.
Definition 10. The Gaussian ǫ-entropic divergence of Qu , Pv from M ∈ Cu,v is
DǫG (Qu , Pv kM) := sup S(ρ, M).
(65)
ρ∈Gu,v
ǫ
For Gaussian M, depending on the choice of the thresholds ǫ1 and ǫ2 , the divergence DǫG (Qu , Pv kM)
can be easily computed or at least bounded.
Theorem 16. Let the bi-observable M ∈ CG
u,v be fixed.
(i) For ǫ1 ǫ2 ≥
~2
2
(cos α) , the divergence DǫG (Qu , Pv kM) is given by
4
log e
[s(xǫ ) + s(yǫ ) + ∆(ǫ; M)] ,
(66)
2
where ρǫ (u, v) is any Gaussian state with Var Qu,ρǫ (u,v) = ǫ1 and Var Pv,ρǫ (u,v) = ǫ2 , and
DǫG (Qu , Pv kM) = S(ρǫ (u, v), M) =
xǫ :=
(ii) For ǫ1 ǫ2 <
M
V11
,
ǫ1
yǫ :=
M
V22
,
ǫ2
∆(ǫ; σ) :=
(bM )2
(aM )2
+
.
M+ǫ
M+ǫ
V11
V22
1
2
~2
2
(cos α) , the divergence DǫG (Qu , Pv kM) is bounded from below by
4
DǫG (Qu , Pv kM) ≥ S(ρǫ (u, v), M) =
log e
[s(xǫ ) + s(yǫ ) + ∆(ǫ; M)] ,
2
(67)
~2
2
where ρǫ (u, v) is any Gaussian state with Var Qu,ρǫ (u,v) = ǫ1 and Var Pv,ρǫ (u,v) =
(cos α) ,
4ǫ1
and
xǫ :=
M
V11
,
ǫ1
yǫ :=
M
4ǫ1 V22
~2 (cos α)
2,
∆(ǫ; σ) :=
(bM )2
(aM )2
+
.
M
M + ~2 (cos α)2
V11 + ǫ1
V22
4ǫ1
The existence of the above states ρǫ (u, v) is guaranteed by Proposition 4.
Proof. By Proposition 4, maximizing the error function over the states in Gu,v
is the same as maximizing
ǫ
(57) with (54) over the parameters Var (Qu,ρ ) and Var (Pv,ρ ) satisfying (55) and (64).
22
Gu,v
ǫ
~2
2
(cos α) , the thresholds themselves satisfy Heisenberg uncertainty relation,
4
and so equality (66) follows from the expression (57) and the fact the functions s(x), s(y), ∆(ρ, M) are
decreasing in Var (Qu,ρ ) and Var (Pv,ρ ).
~2
2
(ii) In the case ǫ1 ǫ2 <
(cos α) , we have to take into account the relation (55) for Var (Qu,ρ )
4
2
2
and Var (Pv,ρ ): the supremum of S(ρ, M) is achieved when Var (Qu,ρ ) Var (Pv,ρ ) = ~4 (cos α) , with
Var (Qu,ρ ) ≥ ǫ1 and Var (Pv,ρ ) ≥ ǫ2 . Then inequality (67) follows by chosing Var (Qu,ρ ) = ǫ1 and
~2
2
(cos α) .
Var (Pv,ρ ) =
4ǫ1
(i) In the case ǫ1 ǫ2 ≥
Remark 10. The conditions on the states ρǫ (u, v) do not depend on M, but only on the parameters defining
2
~2
Gu,v
ǫ . Thus, in the case ǫ1 ǫ2 ≥ 4 (cos α) , any choice of ρǫ (u, v) yields a state which is the worst one for
every Gaussian approximate joint measurement M.
6.1.3 Entropic incompatibility degree of Qu and Pv
The last step is to optimize the state independent ǫ-entropic divergence (65) over all the approximate joint
measurements of Qu and Pv . This is done in the next definition.
Definition 11. The Gaussian ǫ-entropic incompatibility degree of Qu , Pv is
cG
inc (Qu , Pv ; ǫ) :=
inf
M∈CG
u,v
DǫG (Qu , Pv kM) ≡
inf
sup S(ρ, M).
u,v
M∈CG
u,v ρ∈Gǫ
(68)
Again, depending on the choice of the thresholds ǫ1 and ǫ2 , the entropic incompatibility degree cG
inc (Qu , Pv ; ǫ)
can be easily computed or at least bounded.
~2
2
(cos α) , the incompatibility degree cG
inc (Qu , Pv ; ǫ) is given by
4
~ |cos α|
~ |cos α|
G
.
cinc (Qu , Pv ; ǫ) = (log e) ln 1 + √
− √
2 ǫ1 ǫ2
2 ǫ1 ǫ2 + ~ |cos α|
(i) For ǫ1 ǫ2 ≥
Theorem 17.
(69)
The infimum in (68) is attained and the optimal measurement is unique, in the sense that
G
cG
inc (Qu , Pv ; ǫ) = Dǫ (Qu , Pv kMǫ )
for a unique Mǫ ∈ CG
u,v ; such a bi-observable is characterized by
r
r
~ ǫ1
~ ǫ2
Mǫ
Mǫ
=
aMǫ = 0, bMǫ = 0, V11
|cos α| , V22
|cos α| ,
=
2 ǫ2
2 ǫ1
(ii) For ǫ1 ǫ2 <
(70)
Mǫ
V12
= 0.
~2
2
(cos α) , the incompatibility degree cG
inc (Qu , Pv ; ǫ) is bounded from below by
4
1
cG
(Q
,
P
;
ǫ)
≥
(log
e)
ln
(2)
−
.
u
v
inc
2
(71)
(72)
The latter bound is
1
(log e) ln (2) −
= S ρǫ (u, v), Mǫ = inf S ρǫ (u, v), M ,
G
2
M∈Cu,v
(73)
where the state ρǫ (u, v) is defined in item (ii) of Theorem 16 and Mǫ is the bi-observable in CG
u,v
such that
aMǫ = 0,
bMǫ = 0,
Mǫ
V11
= ǫ1 ,
23
Mǫ
V22
=
~2
2
(cos α) ,
4ǫ1
Mǫ
V12
= 0.
(74)
~2
2
(cos α) , due to (66), the proof is the same as that of Theorem 15 with the
4
replacements Var (Qu,ρ ) 7→ ǫ1 and Var (Pv,ρ ) 7→ ǫ2 .
~2
(ii) In the case ǫ1 ǫ2 <
(cos α)2 , starting from (67), the proof is the same as that of Theorem 15 with
4
2
~2
(cos α) .
the replacements Var (Qu,ρ ) 7→ ǫ1 and Var (Pv,ρ ) 7→ 4ǫ
1
Proof. (i) In the case ǫ1 ǫ2 ≥
Remark 11 (State independent MUR, scalar observables). By means of the above results, we can formulate
a state independent entropic MUR for the position Qu and the momentum Pv in the following way. Chosen
two positive thresholds ǫ1 and ǫ2 , there exists a preparation ρǫ (u, v) ∈ Gu,v
(introduced in Theorem 16)
ǫ
such that, for all Gaussian approximate joint measurements M of Qu and Pv , we have
S(Qu,ρǫ (u,v) kM1,ρǫ (u,v) ) + S(Pv,ρǫ (u,v) kM2,ρǫ (u,v) )
~2
~ |cos α|
~ |cos α|
2
, if ǫ1 ǫ2 ≥
− √
(cos α) ,
(log e) ln 1 + √
2
ǫ
ǫ
2
ǫ
ǫ
+
~
|cos
α|
4
1 2
1 2
≥
1
~2
2
(log e) ln (2) −
,
if ǫ1 ǫ2 <
(cos α) .
2
4
(75)
2
The inequality follows by (66) and (69) in the case ǫ1 ǫ2 ≥ ~4 (cos α)2 , and (73) in the case ǫ1 ǫ2 <
2
~2
4 (cos α) .
What is relevant is that, for every approximate joint measurement M, the total information loss S(ρ, M)
does exceed the lower bound (75) even if the set of states Gu,v
forbids preparations ρ with too peaked target
ǫ
distributions. Indeed, without the thresholds ǫ1 , ǫ2 , it would be trivial to exceed the lower bound (75), as
we noted in Section 6.1.2.
We also remark that, chosen ǫ1 and ǫ2 , we found a single state ρǫ (u, v) in Gu,v
that satisfies (75) for
ǫ
every M, so that ρǫ (u, v) is a ‘bad’ state for all Gaussian approximate joint measurements of position and
momentum.
2
2
When ǫ1 ǫ2 ≥ ~4 (cos α) , the optimal approximate joint measurement Mǫ is unique in the class of
Gaussian (u, v)-covariant bi-observables; it depends only on the class of preparations Gu,v
ǫ : it is the best
measurement for the worst choice of the preparation in the class Gu,v
.
ǫ
Remark 12. The entropic incompatibility degree cG
inc (Qu , Pv ; ǫ) is strictly positive for cos α 6= 0 (incompatible target observables) and it goes to zero in the limits α → ±π/2 (compatible observables), ~ → 0
(classical limit), and ǫ1 ǫ2 → ∞ (large uncertainty states).
Remark 13. The scale invariance of the relative entropy extends to the error function S(ρ, M), hence to the
divergence DǫG (Qu , Pv kM) and the entropic incompatibility degree cG
inc (Qu , Pv ; ǫ), as well as the entropic
MUR (75).
6.2 Vector observables
Now the target observables are Q and P given in (3), with pvm’s Q and P; the approximating bi-observables
are the covariant phase-space observables C of Definition 5. Each bi-observable M ∈ C is of the form
M = Mσ for some σ ∈ S, where Mσ is given by (43). CG is the subset of the Gaussian bi-observables in
C, and Mσ ∈ CG if and only if σ is a Gaussian state.
We proceed to define the analogues of the scalar quantities introduced in Sections 6.1.1, 6.1.2, 6.1.3.
In order to do it, in the next proposition we recall some known results on matrices.
Proposition 18 ( [13, 27, 52, 57]). Let M1 and M2 be n × n complex matrices such that M1 > M2 > 0.
Then, we have 0 < M1−1 < M2−1 . Moreover, if s : R+ → R is a strictly increasing continuous function,
we have Tr{s(M1 )} > Tr{s(M2 )}.
6.2.1 Error function
Definition 12. Given the preparation ρ ∈ S and the covariant phase-space observable Mσ , with σ ∈ S, the
error function for the vector case is the sum of the two relative entropies:
S(ρ, Mσ ) := S(Qρ kMσ1,ρ ) + S(Pρ kMσ2,ρ ).
24
(76)
As in the scalar case, the error function is scale invariant, it quantifies a relative error, and we always
have S(ρ, Mσ ) > 0 because position and momentum are incompatible. Indeed, since the marginals of a
bi-observable Mσ ∈ C turn out to be convolutions of the respective sharp observables Q and P with some
probability densities on Rn , Qρ 6= Mσ1,ρ and Pρ 6= Mσ2,ρ for all states ρ; this is an easy consequence, for
instance, of [15, Problem 26.1, p. 362]. In the Gaussian case the error function can be explicitly computed.
Proposition 19 (Error function for the vector Gaussian case). For ρ, σ ∈ G, the error function has the two
equivalent expressions:
log e
Tr {s(Eρ,σ ) + s(Fρ,σ )} + aσ · (Aρ + Aσ )−1 aσ + bσ · (B ρ + B σ )−1 bσ
2
log e
−1
−1
=
Tr s(Nρ,σ
) + s(Rρ,σ
) + aσ · (Aρ + Aσ )−1 aσ + bσ · (B ρ + B σ )−1 bσ ,
2
S(ρ, Mσ ) =
(77a)
(77b)
where the function s is defined in (58), and
Eρ,σ := (Aρ )−1/2 Aσ (Aρ )−1/2 ,
Fρ,σ := (B ρ )−1/2 B σ (B ρ )−1/2 ,
(78a)
Nρ,σ := (Aσ )−1/2 Aρ (Aσ )−1/2 ,
Rρ,σ := (B σ )−1/2 B ρ (B σ )−1/2 .
(78b)
Proof. First of all, recall that
Qρ = N (aρ ; Aρ ),
Pρ = N (bρ ; B ρ ),
Mσ1,ρ = N (aρ + aσ ; Aρ + Aσ )
Mσ2,ρ = N (bρ + bσ ; B ρ + B σ ).
A direct application of (34) yields
S(Qρ kMσ1,ρ ) =
det(Aρ + Aσ ) log e ρ
1
Tr (A + Aσ )−1 Aρ − 1 + aσ · (Aρ + Aσ )−1 aσ .
+
log
ρ
2
det A
2
We can transform this equation by using
i
h
det (Aσ + Aρ )
ρ −1/2
σ
ρ
ρ −1/2
= det (1 + Eρ,σ ) ,
=
det
(A
)
(A
+
A
)
(A
)
det Aρ
Tr (Aρ + Aσ )−1 Aρ − 1
This gives
ln det (1 + Eρ,σ ) = Tr {ln (1 + Eρ,σ )} ,
o
n
= Tr (Aρ )1/2 (Aρ + Aσ )−1 (Aρ )1/2 − 1 = − Tr (1 + Eρ,σ )−1 Eρ,σ .
log e
Tr{s(Eρ,σ )} + aσ · (Aρ + Aσ )−1 aσ .
2
In the same way a similar expression is obtained for S(Pρ kMσ2,ρ ) and (77a) is proved.
On the other hand, by using
S(Qρ kMσ1,ρ ) =
det (1 + Nρ,σ )
det (Aσ + Aρ )
−1
−1
= Tr ln 1 + Nρ,σ
,
= ln
= ln det 1 + Nρ,σ
ρ
det A
det Nρ,σ
o
n
n
o
−1
−1
−1 −1
Tr (Aρ + Aσ )−1 Aρ − 1 = − Tr (Aρ + Aσ ) Aσ = − Tr 1 + Nρ,σ
Nρ,σ
,
ln
and the analogous expressions involving B ρ and Rρ,σ , one gets (77b).
25
State dependent lower bound
In principle, a state dependent lower bound for the error function could be found by analogy with Theorem
15, by taking again the infimum over all joint covariant measurements, that is inf σ S(ρ, Mσ ). By considering only Gaussian states ρ and measurements Mσ , from (18), (77a), (78a) the infimum over σ ∈ G can be
reduced to an infimum over the matrices Aσ :
2
~
log e
.
infσ Tr s (Aρ )−1/2 Aσ (Aρ )−1/2 + s
(B ρ )−1/2 (Aσ )−1 (B ρ )−1/2
inf S(ρ, Mσ ) =
σ∈G
2 A
4
The above equality follows since the monotonicity of s (Proposition 18) implies that the trace term in (77a)
2
attains its minimum when B σ = ~4 (Aρ )−1 . However, it remains an open problem to explicitly compute
the infimum over the matrices Aσ when the preparation ρ is arbitrary.
Nevertheless, the computations can be done at least for a preparation ρ∗ of minimum uncertainty (Proposition 6). Indeed, by (22) we get
inf S(ρ∗ , Mσ ) =
σ∈G
log e
−1
.
infσ Tr s (Eρ,σ ) + s Eρ,σ
2 A
Now we can diagonalize Eρ,σ and minimize over its eigenvalues; since s(x) + s(x−1 ) attains its minimum
value at x = 1, this procedure gives Eρ,σ = 1. So, by denoting by σ∗ the state giving the minimum, we
have
~2 ρ∗ −1
(79)
(A ) ,
B σ∗ = B ρ∗ =
Aσ∗ = Aρ∗ ,
4
(80)
inf S(ρ∗ , Mσ ) = S(ρ∗ , Mσ∗ ) = ns(1) log e.
σ∈G
For an arbitrary ρ ∈ G, we can use the last formula to deduce an upper bound for inf σ∈G S(ρ, Mσ ).
2
Indeed, if ρ∗ is a minimum uncertainty state with Aρ∗ = Aρ , then B ρ ≥ ~4 (Aρ )−1 = B ρ∗ by (19), and,
using again the state σ∗ of (79), we find
inf S(ρ, Mσ ) ≤ S(ρ, Mσ∗ ) ≤ S(ρ∗ , Mσ∗ ) = ns(1) log e.
σ∈G
The second inequality in the last formula follows from (77b), (78b) and the monotonicity of s (Prop. 18).
6.2.2 Entropic divergence of Q, P from Mσ
In order to define a state independent measure of the error made in regarding the marginals of Mσ as
approximations of Q and P, we can proceed along the lines of the scalar case in Section 6.1.2. To this end,
we introduce the following vector analogue of the Gaussian states defined in (64):
Gǫ := {ρ ∈ G : Aρ ≥ ǫ1 1, B ρ ≥ ǫ2 1} ,
ǫ ≡ (ǫ1 , ǫ2 ),
ǫi > 0.
(81)
In the vector case, Definition 10 then reads as follows.
Definition 13. The Gaussian ǫ-entropic divergence of Q, P from Mσ ∈ C is
DǫG (Q, PkMσ ) := sup S(ρ, Mσ ).
(82)
ρ∈Gǫ
As in the scalar case, when Mσ is Gaussian, depending on the choice of the product ǫ1 ǫ2 , we can
compute the divergence DǫG (Q, PkMσ ) or at least bound it from below.
Theorem 20. Let the bi-observable Mσ ∈ CG be fixed.
~2
, the divergence DǫG (Q, PkMσ ) is given by
4
log e h
Tr {s (Aσ /ǫ1 ) + s (B σ /ǫ2 )}
DǫG (Q, PkMσ ) = S(ρǫ , Mσ ) =
2
(i) For ǫ1 ǫ2 ≥
i
+ aσ · (Aσ + ǫ1 1)−1 aσ + bσ · (B σ + ǫ2 1)−1 bσ , (83)
where ρǫ is any Gaussian state with Aρǫ = ǫ1 1 and B ρǫ = ǫ2 1.
26
Gǫ
~2
, the divergence DǫG (Q, PkMσ ) is bounded from below by
4
"
log e
G
σ
σ
Dǫ (Q, PkM ) ≥ S(ρǫ , M ) =
Tr s (Aσ /ǫ1 ) + s 4ǫ1 B σ /~2
2
(ii) For ǫ1 ǫ2 <
+ a · (A + ǫ1 1)
σ
σ
−1 σ
where ρǫ is any Gaussian state with Aρǫ = ǫ1 1 and B ρǫ =
σ
a +b ·
!−1
~2
B +
1
4ǫ1
σ
σ
b
#
, (84)
~2
1.
4ǫ1
~2
, for ρ ∈ Gǫ we have Nρ,σ ≥ ǫ1 (Aσ )−1 and Rρ,σ ≥ ǫ2 (B σ )−1 ; by
Proof. (i) In the case ǫ1 ǫ2 ≥
4
Proposition 18 we get
−1
Tr{s(Nρ,σ
)} ≤ Tr {s (Aσ /ǫ1 )} ,
−1
Tr{s(Rρ,σ
)} ≤ Tr {s (B σ /ǫ2 )} ,
(Aρ + Aσ )−1 ≤ (ǫ1 1 + Aσ )−1 ,
(B ρ + B σ )−1 ≤ (ǫ2 1 + B σ )−1 .
By using these inequalities in the expression (77b), we get (83).
~2
(ii) In the case ǫ1 ǫ2 <
, the lower bound (84) follows by evaluating S(ρ, Mσ ) at the state ρ = ρǫ ∈
4
~2
Gǫ with Aρǫ = ǫ1 1 and B ρǫ =
1.
4ǫ1
~2
Note that ρǫ does not depend on σ, but only on the parameters defining Gǫ : again, in the case ǫ1 ǫ2 ≥ ,
4
the error attains its maximum at a state which is independent of the approximate measurement.
6.2.3 Entropic incompatibility degree of Q and P
By analogy with Section 6.1.3, we can optimize the ǫ-entropic divergence over all the approximate joint
measurements of Q and P .
Definition 14. The Gaussian ǫ-entropic incompatibility degree of Q and P is
σ
G
σ
cG
inc (Q, P; ǫ) := inf Dǫ (Q, PkM ) ≡ inf sup S(ρ, M ).
σ∈G
σ∈G ρ∈Gǫ
(85)
Again, depending on the product ǫ1 ǫ2 , we can compute or at least bound cG
inc (Q, P; ǫ) from below.
Theorem 21.
~2
, the incompatibility degree cG
inc (Q, P; ǫ) is given by
4
~
~
G
.
− √
cinc (Q, P; ǫ) = n (log e) ln 1 + √
2 ǫ1 ǫ2
2 ǫ1 ǫ2 + ~
(i) For ǫ1 ǫ2 ≥
(86)
The infimum in (85) is attained and the optimal measurement is unique, in the sense that
G
σǫ
cG
inc (Q, P; ǫ) = Dǫ (Q, PkM )
for a unique σǫ ∈ G; such a state is the minimal uncertainty state characterized by
r
r
~ ǫ1
~ ǫ2
σǫ
σǫ
σǫ
σǫ
A =
b = 0,
a = 0,
1,
B =
1,
C σǫ = 0.
2 ǫ2
2 ǫ1
27
(87)
(88)
(ii) For ǫ1 ǫ2 <
~2
2
(cos α) , the incompatibility degree cG
inc (Q, P; ǫ) is bounded from below by
4
1
G
cinc (Q, P; ǫ) ≥ n(log e) ln (2) −
.
2
(89)
The latter bound is
1
n(log e) ln (2) −
2
= S(ρǫ , Mσǫ ) = inf S(ρǫ , Mσ ),
(90)
σ∈G
where the preparation ρǫ is defined in item (ii) of Theorem 20 and σǫ is the state in G such that
aσǫ = 0,
bσǫ = 0,
Aσǫ = ǫ1 1,
B σǫ =
~2
1,
4ǫ1
C σǫ = 0.
(91)
~2
, from the expression (83) we get immediately aσǫ = 0, bσǫ = 0 and by
4
2
2
(19) we have B σ ≥ ~4 (Aσ )−1 . So, by (83) and Propositions 4 and 18, we get B σ = ~4 (Aσ )−1 , and
Proof. (i) In the case ǫ1 ǫ2 ≥
2
~
log e
σ −1
σ
.
(A )
inf Tr s (A /ǫ1 ) + s
inf sup S(ρ, M ) =
σ∈G ρ∈Gǫ
2 Aσ
4ǫ2
σ
By minimizing over all the eigenvalues of Aσ , we get the minimum (86), which is attained if and only if
Aσ is as in (88). Hence, Aσǫ and B σǫ are as in (87). This implies that any optimal state σǫ is a minimum
uncertainty state; so, C σǫ = 0 and the state σǫ is unique.
~2
(ii) In the case ǫ1 ǫ2 <
, by (19) and Proposition 18, inequality (84) implies
4
inf sup S(ρ, Mσ ) ≥
σ∈G ρ∈Gǫ
log e
infσ Tr s (Aσ /ǫ1 ) + s ǫ1 (Aσ )−1 .
2 A
By minimizing over all the eigenvalues of Aσ , we get (89). Then (89) holds for ρǫ as in item (ii) of Theorem
20 and σǫ in (91).
Remark 14 (State independent MUR, vector observables). By means of the above results, we can formulate
the following state independent entropic MUR for the position Q and momentum P . Chosen two positive
thresholds ǫ1 and ǫ2 , there exists a preparation ρǫ ∈ Gǫ (introduced in Theorem 20) such that, for all
Gaussian approximate joint measurements Mσ of Q and P, we have
S(Qρǫ kMσ1,ρǫ ) + S(Pρǫ kMσ2,ρǫ )
~
~
,
−
n
(log
e)
ln
1
+
√
√
2 ǫ1 ǫ2
2 ǫ1 ǫ2 + ~
≥
1
n(log e) ln (2) −
,
2
2
2
~2
,
4
~2
if ǫ1 ǫ2 <
.
4
if ǫ1 ǫ2 ≥
(92)
The inequality follows by (83) and (86) for ǫ1 ǫ2 ≥ ~4 , and (90) for ǫ1 ǫ2 < ~4 .
Thus, also in the vector case, for every approximate joint measurement Mσ , the total information loss
S(ρ, Mσ ) does exceed the lower bound (92) even if Gǫ forbids preparations ρ with too peaked target distributions. Moreover, chosen ǫ1 and ǫ2 , one can fix again a single ‘bad’ state ρǫ in Gǫ that satisfies (92) for
all Gaussian approximate joint measurements Mσ of Q and P .
2
Whenever ǫ1 ǫ2 ≥ ~4 , the optimal approximating joint measurement Mσǫ is unique in the class of
Gaussian covariant bi-observables; it corresponds to a minimum uncertainty state σǫ which depends only
on the chosen class of preparations Gǫ , that is, on the thresholds ǫ1 and ǫ2 : Mσǫ is the best measurement
for the worst choice of the preparation in that class.
28
Remark 15. For n = 1, the vector lower bound in (92) reduces to the scalar lower bound found in (75) for
two parallel directions u and v; for n ≥ 1, the bound linearly grows with n.
Remark 16. The entropic incompatibility degree cG
inc (Qu , Pv ; ǫ) is strictly positive for cos α 6= 0 (incompatible target observables) and it goes to zero in the limit α → ±π/2 (compatible observables), ~ → 0
(classical limit), and ǫ1 ǫ2 → ∞ (large uncertainty states).
Remark 17 (The macroscopic limit.). Similarly to Remark 6 for scalar target observables, also the MUR
(92) is practically ineffective for macroscopic systems. Indeed, suppose we are concerned with position
and momentum of a macroscopic particle, say the center of mass of a multi-particle system (in this case
n = 3). The states ρ which can be practically prepared have macroscopic widths, say ρ ∈ Gǫ with ‘large’
thresholds ǫ and ǫ1 ǫ2 ≫ ~2 /4. Then, we consider a measuring instrument Mσ∗ having a high precision
with respect to this class of states, but not necessarily reaching a precision near the quantum limits. For
instance, let us take Mσ∗ ∈ CG with Aσ∗ = δ1 1, B σ∗ = δ2 1, and 0 < δ1 ≪ ǫ1 , 0 < δ2 ≪ ǫ2 ; we take it
also unbiased: aσ∗ = 0, bσ∗ = 0. Obviously, δ1 δ2 ≥ ~2 /4 must hold. Then, ∀ρ ∈ Gǫ by (77a) and (78a)
we have
δ2
δ1
δ2
δ1
1,
Fρ,σ∗ = ρ ≤
1,
Eρ,σ∗ = ρ ≤
A
ǫ1
B
ǫ2
0 < S(ρ, Mσ∗ ) =
log e
n log e
Tr {s(Eρ,σ∗ ) + s(Fρ,σ∗ )} ≤
[s(δ1 /ǫ1 ) + s(δ2 /ǫ2 )] .
2
2
By (58) the function s is increasing and in a neighborhood of zero it behaves as s(x) ≃ x2 /2; in the
present case δ1 /ǫ1 ≪ 1 and δ2 /ǫ2 ≪ 1 and, so, we have that the error function is negligible. This is
practically a ‘classical’ case: the preparation has ‘large’ position and momentum uncertainties and the
measuring instrument is ‘relatively good’. In this situation we do not see the difference between the joint
measurement of position and momentum and their separate sharp distributions. Of course the bound (92)
continues to hold, but it is also negligible since ǫ1 ǫ2 ≫ ~2 /4.
Remark 18. The scale invariance of the relative entropy extends also in the vector case to the error function
S(ρ, Mσ ), the divergence DǫG (Q, PkMσ ) and the entropic incompatibility degree cG
inc (Q, P; ǫ), as well as
the entropic MUR (92). Indeed, let us consider the dimensionless versions of position and momentum (35)
e P
e introduced in Section 4. Accordingly, we rescale the
and their associated projection valued measures Q,
R
σ
e σ (B) =
fσ x, p)de
e xdp,
e
joint measurement M of (43) in the same way, obtaining the POVM M
B M (e
fσ (e
e =
M
x, p)
1
n exp
(2πλ)
i
i
e−x
e−x
e · Pe
e · Pe
pe · Q
ΠσΠ exp −
pe · Q
.
λ
λ
e and p,
e as well as the components of the Borel set B, are dimensionless.
Here, both the vector variables x
By the scale invariance of the relative entropy, the error function takes the same value as in the dimensioned
case:
e ρ kM
e σ ) + S(P
e ρ kM
e σ ) = S(Qρ kMσ ) + S(Pρ kMσ ).
S(Q
(93)
1,ρ
2,ρ
1,ρ
2,ρ
Then, the scale invariance holds for the entropic divergence and incompatibility degree, too:
where e
ǫ1 :=
e Pk
e M
e σ ) = DG (Q, PkMσ ),
DǫeG (Q,
ǫ
e e e) = cG (Q, P; ǫ),
cG
inc (Q, P; ǫ
inc
κǫ1
λ2 ǫ2
λ2
~2
and e
ǫ2 :=
. In particular e
ǫ1 e
ǫ2 ≥
⇐⇒ ǫ1 ǫ2 ≥
and, in this case, we have
~
κ~
4
4
λ
e e e) = cG (Q, P; ǫ) = n (log e) s √~
.
= cG
n (log e) s √
inc (Q, P; ǫ
inc
2 ǫ1 ǫ2
2 e
ǫ1 e
ǫ2
7 Conclusions
We have extended the relative entropy formulation of MURs given in [2] from the case of discrete incompatible observables to a particular instance of continuous target observables, namely the position and
momentum vectors, or two components of them along two possibly non parallel directions. The entropic
29
MURs we found share the nice property of being scale invariant and well-behaved in the classical and
macroscopic limits. Moreover, in the scalar case, when the angle spanned by the position and momentum
components goes to ±π/2, the entropic bound correctly reflects their increasing compatibility by approaching zero with continuity.
Although our results are limited to the case of Gaussian preparation states and covariant Gaussian
approximate joint measurements, we conjecture that the bounds we found still hold for arbitrary states and
general (not necessarily covariant or Gaussian) bi-observables. Let us see with some more detail how this
should work in the case when the target observables are the vectors Q and P .
The most general procedure should be to consider the error function S(Qρ kM1,ρ ) + S(Pρ kM2,ρ ) for
an arbitrary POVM M on Rn × Rn and any state ρ ∈ S. First of all, we need states for which neither the
position nor the momentum dispersion are too small; the obvious generalization of the test states (81) is
Sǫ := {ρ ∈ S2 : Aρ ≥ ǫ1 1, B ρ ≥ ǫ2 1} ,
ǫi > 0.
Then, the most general definitions of the entropic divergence and incompatibility degree are:
Dǫ (Q, PkM) := sup [S(Qρ kM1,ρ ) + S(Pρ kM2,ρ )] ,
(94)
cinc (Q, P; ǫ) := inf Dǫ (Q, PkM).
(95)
ρ∈Sǫ
M
It may happen that Qρ is not absolutely continuous with respect to M1,ρ , or Pρ with respect to M2,ρ ; in this
case, the error function and the entropic divergence take the value +∞ by definition. So, we can restrict
to bi-observables that are (weakly) absolutely continuous with respect to the Lebesgue measure. However,
the true difficulty is that, even with this assumption, here we are not able to estimate (94), hence (95). It
could be that the symmetrization techniques used in [25, 65] can be extended to the present setting, and
one can reduce the evaluation of the entropic incompatibility index to optimizing over all covariant biobservables. Indeed, in the present paper we a priori selected only covariant approximating measurements;
we would like to understand if, among all approximating measurements, the relative entropy approach
selects covariant bi-observables by itself. However, even if M is covariant, there remains the problem that
we do not know how to evaluate (94) if ρ and M are not Gaussian. It is reasonable to expect that some
continuity and convexity arguments should apply, and the bounds in Theorem 21 could be extended to
the general case by taking dense convex combinations. Also the techniques used for the PURs in [12, 14]
could be of help in order to extend what we did with Gaussian states to arbitrary states. This leads us to
conjecture:
cinc (Q, P; ǫ) = cG
(96)
inc (Q, P; ǫ).
Conjecture (96) is also supported since the uniqueness of the optimal approximating bi-observable in Theorem 21.(i) is reminiscent of what happens in the discrete case of two Fourier conjugated mutually unbiased bases (MUBs); indeed, in the latter case, the optimal bi-observable is actually unique among all the
bi-observables, not only the covariant ones [2, Theor. 5]. Similar considerations obviously apply also to
the case of scalar target observables. We leave a more deep investigation of equality (96) to future work.
As a final consideration, one could be interested in finding error/disturbance bounds involving sequential measurements of position and momentum, rather than considering all their possible approximate joint
measurements. As sequential measurements are a proper subset of the set of all the bi-observables, optimizing only over them should lead to bounds that are greater than cinc . This is the reason for which in [2]
an error/disturbance entropic bound, denoted by ced and dinstinct from cinc , was introduced. However, it
was also proved that the equality cinc = ced holds when one of the target observables is discrete and sharp.
Now, in the present paper, only sharp target observables are involved; although the argument of [2] can not
be extended to the continuous setting, the optimal approximating joint observables we found in Theorems
17.(i) and 21.(i) actually are sequential measurements. Indeed, the optimal bi-observable in Theorem 17.(i)
is one of the POVMs described in Examples 2 and 3 (see (74)); all these bi-observables have a (trivial) sequential implementation in terms of an unsharp measurement of Qu followed by sharp Pv . On the other
hand, in the vector case, it was shown in [29, Corollary 1] that all covariant phase-space observables can be
obtained as a sequential measurement of an unsharp version of the position Q followed by the sharp measurement of the momentum P. Therefore, cinc = ced also for target position and momentum observables, in
both the scalar and vector case.
30
References
[1] Barchielli, A., Gregoratti, M.: Quantum Trajectories and Measurements in Continuous Time: The
Diffusive Case, Lect. Notes Phys. 782, Springer, Berlin & Heidelberg, 2009.
[2] Barchielli, A., Gregoratti, M., Toigo, A.: Measurement uncertainty relations for discrete observables:
Relative entropy formulation, (2016) arXiv:1608.01986.
[3] Barchielli, A., Lupieri, G.: Quantum stochastic calculus, operation valued stochastic processes and
continual measurements in quantum mechanics, J. Math. Phys. 26 (1985) 2222–2230.
[4] Barchielli, A., Holevo, A.S., Lupieri, G.: An analogue of Hunt’s representation theorem in quantum
probability, J. Theor. Probab. 6 (1993) 231–265.
[5] Barchielli, A., Lupieri, G.: A quantum analogue of Hunt’s representation theorem for the generator
of convolution semigroups on Lie groups, Probab. Theory Rel. Fields 88 (1991) 167–194.
[6] Barchielli, A., Lupieri, G.: Instrumental processes, entropies, information in quantum continual measurements, Quantum Information and Computation 4 (2004) 437–449.
[7] Barchielli, A., Lupieri, G.: Instruments and channels in quantum information theory, Optics and
Spectroscopy 99 (2005) 425–432.
[8] Barchielli, A., Lupieri, G.: Quantum measurements and entropic bounds on information transmission,
Quantum Information and Computation 6 (2006) 16–45.
[9] Barchielli, A., Lupieri, G.: Instruments and mutual entropies in quantum information, Banach Center
Publ. 73 (2006) 65–80.
[10] Barchielli, A., Lupieri, G.: Entropic bounds and continual measurements. In Quantum Probability
and Infinite Dimensional Analysis, QP-PQ: Quantum Probability and White Noise Analysis Vol. 20;
Accardi L., Freudenberg W., Schürmann, M. (Eds.); World Scientific, Singapore, 2007; pp. 79–89.
[11] Barchielli, A., Lupieri, G.: Information gain in quantum continual measurements. In Quantum
Stochastic and Information; Belavkin, V.P., Guţǎ, M. (Eds.); World Scientific, Singapore, 2008; pp.
325–345.
[12] Beckner, W.: Inequalities in Fourier analysis, Ann. Math. 102 (1975) 159–182.
[13] Bhatia, R.: Matrix Analysis, Springer, New York, 1997.
[14] Białynicki-Birula, I., Mycielski, J.: Uncertainty relations for information entropy in wave machanics,
Commun. Math. Phys. 44 (1975) 129–132.
[15] Billingsley, P.: Probability and Measure, second edition, Wiley, New York, 1986.
[16] Braunstein, S.L., van Loock, P.: Quantum information with continuous variables, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77
(2005) 513–577.
[17] Burnham, K.P., Anderson, D.R.: Model Selection and Multimodel Inference - A Practical
Information-Theoretic Approach, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2002.
[18] Buscemi, F., Das, S., Wilde, M.M.: Approximate reversibility in the context of entropy gain, information gain, and complete positivity, Phys Rev A 93 (2016) 062314.
[19] Buscemi, F., Hall, M.J.W., Ozawa, M., Wilde, M.M.: Noise and disturbance in quantum measurements: an information-theoretic approach, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 050401.
[20] Busch, P., Grabowski, M., Lahti, P.: Operational Quantum Physics, Springer, Berlin, 1997.
31
[21] Busch, P., Heinonen, T., Lahti, P.: Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle, Physics Reports 452 (2007)
155–176.
[22] Busch, P., Heinosaari, T., Schultz, J., Stevens, N.: Comparing the degrees of incompatibility inherent
in probabilistic physical theories, Europhys. Lett. 103 (2013) 10002.
[23] Busch, P., Lahti, P., Pellonpää, J.-P., Ylinen, K.: Quantum Measurement, Springer, Berlin, 2016.
[24] Busch, P., Lahti, P., Werner, R.: Proof of Heisenberg’s error-disturbance relation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111
(2013) 160405.
[25] Busch, P., Lahti, P., Werner, R.: Measurement uncertainty relations, J. Math. Phys. 55 (2014) 042111.
[26] Busch, P., Lahti, P., Werner, R.: Quantum root-mean-square error and measurement uncertainty relations, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86 (2014) 1261–1281.
[27] Carlen, E.: Trace Inequalities and Quantum Entropy: An Introductory Course, Contemporary Mathematics, 2010
[28] Carmeli, C., Heinonen, T., Toigo, A.: Position and momentum observables on R and on R3 , J. Math.
Phys. 45 (2004) 2526–2539.
[29] Carmeli, C., Heinonen, T., Toigo, A.: Sequential measurements of conjugate observables, J. Phys. A:
Math. Theor. 44 (2011) 285304.
[30] Cassinelli, G., De Vito, E., Toigo, A.: Positive operator valued measures covariant with respect to an
irreducible representation, J. Math. Phys. 44 (2003) 4768–4775.
[31] Coles, P.J., Berta, M., Tomamichel, M., Whener, S.: Entropic uncertainty relations and their applications, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89 (2017) 015002.
[32] Coles, P.J., Furrer, F.: State-dependent approach to entropic measurement-disturbance relations, Phys.
Lett. A 379 (2015) 105–112.
[33] Cover, T.M., Thomas, J.A.: Elements of Information Theory, second edition, Wiley, Hoboken, New
Jersey, 2006.
[34] Davies, E.B.: Quantum Theory of Open Systems, Academic, London, 1976.
[35] Gibilisco, P., Isola, T.: On a refinement of Heisenberg uncertainty relation by means of quantum
Fisher information, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 375 (2011) 270–275.
[36] Heinosaari, T., Kiukas, J., Schultz, J.: Breaking Gaussian incompatibility on continuous variable
quantum systems, J. Math. Phys. 56 (2015) 082202.
[37] Heinosaari, T., Miyadera, T., Ziman, M.: An invitation to quantum incompatibility, J. Phys. A: Math.
Theor. 49 (2016) 123001.
[38] Heinosaari, T., Schultz, J., Toigo, A., Ziman, M.: Maximally incompatible quantum observables,
Phys. Lett. A 378 (2014) 1695–1699.
[39] Heinosaari, T., Ziman, M.: The mathematical language of quantum theory: From uncertainty to
entanglement, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012.
[40] Heisenberg, W.: Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik,
Zeitschr. Phys. 43 (1927) 172–198.
[41] Hirschman, I.I.: A note on entropy, Amer. J. Math. 79 (1957) 152–156.
[42] Holevo, A.S.: Investigations in the General Theory of Statistical Decisions, Proceedings Of the
Steklov Institute of Mathematics 3 (1978)
32
[43] Holevo, A.S.: Infinitely divisible measurements in quantum probability theory, Theory Probab. Appl.
31 1986 493–497.
[44] Holevo, A.S.: Statistical Structure of Quantum Theory, Lecture Notes in Physics m 67; Springer,
Berlin, 2001.
[45] Holevo, A.S.: Probabilistic and Statistical Aspects of Quantum Theory, Quaderni della Normale;
Edizioni della Normale, Pisa, 2011.
[46] Holevo, A.S.: Quantum Systems, Channels, Information, de Gruiter, Berlin, 2012.
[47] Horn, R.A., Zhang, F.: Basic Properties of the Schur Complement. In The Schur Complement and
Its Applications, Zhang, F. (Ed.), Numerical Methods and Algorithms, 4, Springer, Berlin, 2005, pp.
17–46.
[48] Kiukas, J., Lahti, P., Ylinen, K.: Normal covariant quantization maps, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 319 (2006)
783–801.
[49] Kiukas, J., Schultz, J.: Informationally complete sets of Gaussian measurements, J. Phys. A: Math
Theor. 46 (2013) 485303.
[50] Maassen, H., Uffink, J.B.M.: Generalized entropic uncertainty relations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 (1988)
1103–1106.
[51] Maccone, L.: Entropic information-disturbance tradeoff, EPL 77 (2007) 40002.
[52] Ohya, M., Petz, D.: Quantum entropy and its use, Springer, Berlin, 1993.
[53] Ozawa, M.: Position measuring interactions and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, Phys. Lett. A
299 (2002) 1–7.
[54] Ozawa, M.: Physical content of Heisenberg’s uncertainty relation: limitation and reformulation, Phys.
Lett. A 318 (2003) 21–29.
[55] Ozawa, M.: Universally valid reformulation of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle on noise and
disturbance in measurement, Phys. Rev. A 67 (2003) 042105.
[56] Ozawa, M.: Heisenberg’s original derivation of the uncertainty principle and its universally valid
reformulations, Current Sci. 109 (2015) 2006–2016.
[57] Petz, D.: Quantum Information Theory and Quantum Statistics, Springer, Berlin, 2008.
[58] Robertson, H.: The uncertainty principle, Phys. Rev. 34 (1929) 163–164.
[59] Simon, R., Mukunda, N., Dutta, B.: Quantum-noise matrix for multimode systems: U (n) invariance,
squeezing, and normal forms, Phys. Rev. A 49 (1994) 1567–1583.
[60] Simon, R., Sudarshan, E.C.G., Mukunda, N.: Gaussian-Wigner distributions in quantum mechanics
and optics, Phys. Rev. A 36 (1987) 3868–3880.
[61] Topsøe, F.: Basic concepts, identities and inequalities — the toolkit of Information Theory, Entropy
3 (2001) 162–190.
[62] Weedbrook, C., Pirandola, S., Garcı́a-Patrón, R., Cerf, N.J., Ralph, T.C., Shapiro, J.H., Lloyd, S.:
Gaussian quantum information, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84 (2012) 621–669.
[63] Wehner, S., Winter, A.: Entropic uncertainty relations — a survey, New J. Phys. 12 (2010) 025009.
[64] Werner, R.F.: Quantum harmonic analysis on phase spaces, J. Math. Phys. 25 (1983) 1404–1411.
[65] Werner, R.F.: The uncertainty relation for joint measurement of position and momentum, Quantum
Information and Computation 4 (2004) 546–562.
[66] Werner, R.F.: Uncertainty relations for general phase spaces, Front. Phys. 11 (2016) 110305.
33
| 7cs.IT
|
arXiv:1404.1041v1 [math.AG] 3 Apr 2014
Blowups and Resolution
Herwig Hauser
To the memory of Sheeram Abhyankar,
with great respect.
This manuscript originates from a series of lectures the author1 gave at the Clay
Summer School on Resolution of Singularities at Obergurgl in the Tyrolean Alps
in June 2012. A hundred young and ambitious students gathered for four weeks
to hear and learn about resolution of singularities. Their interest and dedication
became essential for the success of the school.
The reader of this article is ideally an algebraist or geometer having a rudimentary acquaintance with the main results and techniques in resolution of singularities.
The purpose is to provide quick and concrete information about specific topics in
the field. As such, the article is modelled like a dictionary and not particularly
suited to be read from the beginning to the end (except for those who like to
read dictionaries). To facilitate the understanding of selected portions of the text
without reading the whole earlier material, a certain repetition of definitions and
assertions has been accepted.
Background information on the historic development and the motivation behind
the various constructions can be found in the cited literature, especially in [Obe00,
Hau03, Hau10a, FH10, Cut04, Kol07, Lip75]. Complete proofs of several more
technical results appear in [EH02].
All statements are formulated for algebraic varieties and morphism between
them. They are mostly also valid, with the appropriate modifications, for schemes.
In certain cases, the respective statements for schemes are indicated separately.
Each chapter concludes with a broad selection of examples, ranging from computational exercises to suggestions for additional material which could not be covered in the text. Some more challenging problems are marked with a superscript
+
. The examples should be especially useful for people planning to give a graduate
course on the resolution of singularities. Occasionally the examples repeat or specialize statements which have appeared in the text and which are worth to be done
personally before looking at the given proof. In the appendix, hints and answers
to a selection of examples marked by a superscript . are given.
Several results appear without proof, due to lack of time and energy of the
author. Precise references are given whenever possible. The various survey articles
contain complementary bibliography.
1
Supported in part by the Austrian Science Fund FWF within the projects P-21461 and
P-25652.
1
2
HERWIG HAUSER
The Clay Mathematics Institute chose resolution of singularities as the topic
of the 2012 summer school. It has been a particular pleasure to cooperate in
this endeavour with its research director David Ellwood, whose enthusiasm and
interpretation of the school largely coincided with the approach of the organizers,
thus creating a wonderful working atmosphere. His sensitiveness of how to plan
and realize the event has been exceptional.
The CMI director Jim Carlson and the CMI secretary Julie Feskoe supported
very efficiently the preparation and realization of the school.
Xudong Zheng provided a preliminary write-up of the lectures, Stefan Perlega
and Eleonore Faber completed several missing details in preliminary drafts of the
manuscript. Faber also produced the two visualizations. The discussion of the examples in the appendix was worked out by Perlega and Valerie Roitner. Anonymous
referees helped substantially with their remarks and criticism to eliminate deficiencies of the exposition. Barbara Beeton from the AMS took care of the TeX-layout.
All this was very helpful.
Contents
1. Lecture I: A First Example of Resolution
2. Lecture II: Varieties and Schemes
3. Lecture III: Singularities
4. Lecture IV: Blowups
5. Lecture V: Properties of Blowup
6. Lecture VI: Transforms of Ideals and Varieties under Blowup
7. Lecture VII: Resolution Statements
8. Lecture VIII: Invariants of Singularities
9. Lecture IX: Hypersurfaces of Maximal Contact
10. Lecture X: Coefficient Ideals
11. Lecture XI: Resolution in Zero Characteristic
12. Lecture XII: Positive Characteristic Phenomena
13. Discussion of selected examples
References
2
5
13
17
27
30
34
36
44
47
52
56
61
76
1. Lecture I: A First Example of Resolution
Let X be the zeroset in affine three space A3 of the polynomial
f = 27x2 y 3 z 2 + (x2 + y 3 − z 2 )3
over a field K of characteristic different from 2 and 3. This is an algebraic surface,
called Camelia, with possibly singular points and curves, and certain symmetries.
For instance, the origin 0 is singular on X, and X is symmetric with respect to the
automorphisms of A3 given by replacing x by −x or z by −z, and also by replacing
y by −y while interchanging x with z. Sending x, y and z to t3 x , t2 y and t3 z
for t ∈ K also preserves X. See figure 1 for a plot of the real points of X. The
intersections of X with the three coordinate hyperplanes of A3 are given as the
zerosets of the equations
BLOWUPS AND RESOLUTION
3
x = (y 3 − z 2 )3 = 0,
y = (x2 − z 2 )3 = 0,
z = (x2 + y 3 )3 = 0.
These intersections are plane curves: two perpendicular cusps lying in the xy- and
yz-plane, respectively the union of the two diagonals in the xz-plane. The singular
locus Sing(X) of X is given as the zeroset of the partial derivatives of f inside X.
This yields for Sing(X) the additional equations
x · [9y 3 z 2 + (x2 + y 3 − z 2 )2 ] = 0,
y 2 · [9x2 z 2 + (x2 + y 3 − z 2 )2 ] = 0,
z · [9x2 y 3 − (x2 + y 3 − z 2 )2 ] = 0.
Combining these equations with f = 0, it results that the singular locus of X has
six irreducible components, defined respectively by
x = y 3 − z 2 = 0,
z = x2 + y 3 = 0,
y = x + z = 0,
y = x − z = 0,
√
x − y 3 = x + −1 · z = 0,
√
x2 − y 3 = x − −1 · z = 0.
2
The first four components of Sing(X) coincide with the four curves given by the
three coordinate hyperplane sections of√X. The last two components are plane
cusps in the hyperplanes given by x ± −1 · z = 0. At points a 6= 0 on the first
two singular components of Sing(X), the intersections of X with a plane through
a and transversal to the component are again cuspidal curves.
Figure 1. The surface Camelia: 27x2 y 3 z 2 + (x2 + y 3 − z 2 )3 = 0.
4
HERWIG HAUSER
Consider now the surface Y in A4 which is given as the cartesian product C ×C
of the plane cusp C : x2 − y 3 = 0 in A2 with itself. It is defined by the equations
x2 − y 3 = z 2 − w3 = 0. The singular locus Sing(Y ) is the union of the two cusps
C1 = C × 0 and C2 = 0 × C defined by x2 − y 3 = z = w = 0, respectively
x = y = z 2 − w3 = 0. The surface Y admits the parametrization
γ : A2 → A4 , (s, t) 7→ (s3 , s2 , t3 , t2 ).
The image of γ is Y . The composition of γ with the linear projection
π : A4 → A3 , (x, y, z, w) 7→ (x, −y + w, z)
yields the map
δ = π ◦ γ : A2 → A3 , (s, t) 7→ (s3 , −s2 + t2 , t3 ).
Replacing in the polynomial f of X the variables x, y, z by s3 , −s2 + t2 , t3 gives
0. This shows that the image of δ lies in X. As X is irreducible of dimension 2
and δ has rank 2 outside 0 the image of δ is dense in (and actually equal to) X.
Therefore the image of Y under π is dense in X: This interprets X as a contraction
of Y by means of the projection π from A4 to A3 . The two surfaces X and Y are
not isomorphic because, for instance, their singular loci have a different number of
components. The simple geometry of Y as a cartesian product of two plane curves
is scrambled up when projecting it down to X.
The point blowup of Y in the origin produces a surface Y1 whose singular locus
has two components. They map to the two components C1 and C2 of Sing(Y )
and are regular and transversal to each other. The blowup X1 of X at 0 will still
be the image of Y1 under a suitable projection. The four singular components of
Sing(X) will become regular in X1 and will either meet pairwise transversally or
not at all. The two regular components of Sing(X) will remain regular in X1 but
will no longer meet each other, cf. figure 2.
Figure 2. The surface X1 obtained from Camelia by a point blowup.
The point blowup of Y1 in the intersection point of the two curves of Sing(Y1 )
separates the two curves and yields a surface Y2 whose singular locus consists of
two disjoint regular curves. Blowing up these separately yields a regular surface Y3
and thus resolves the singularities of Y . The resolution of the singularities of X is
more complicated, see the examples below.
BLOWUPS AND RESOLUTION
5
Examples
Example 1.1. . Show that the surface X defined in A3 by 27x2 y 3 z 2 + (x2 +
y − z 2 )3 = 0 is the image of the cartesian product Y of the cusp C : x3 − y 2 = 0
with itself under the projection from A4 to A3 given by (x, y, z, w) 7→ (x, −y + w, z).
3
Example 1.2. . Find additional symmetries of X aside from those mentioned
in the text.
Example 1.3. . Produce a real visualization
of the surface obtained from
√
Camelia by replacing in the equation z by −1 · z. Determine the components
of the singular locus.
Example 1.4. . Consider at the point a = (0, 1, 1) of X the plane P : 2y +3z =
5 through a. It is transversal to the component of the singular locus of X passing
through a (i.e., this component is regular at a and its tangent line at a does not lie
in P ). Determine the singularity of X ∩ P at a. The normal vector (0, 2, 3) to P
is the tangent vector at t = 1 of the parametrization (0, t2 , t3 ) of the component of
Sing(X) defined by x = y 3 − z 2 .
√
Example 1.5. The point a on X with coordinates (1, 1, −1) is a singular
point of X, and a non-singular point of the curve of Sing(X) passing through it. A
plane transversal to Sing(X) at a is given e.g. by
√
P : 3x + 2y + 3 −1 · z = 9.
√
Determine the singularity of X ∩ P at a. The normal vector
(3, 2, 3 −1) to P is
√
the tangent vector at s = 1 of the parametrization
(s3 , s2 , −1 · s3 ) of the curve of
√
2
3
Sing(X) through a defined by x − y = x − −1 · z = 0.
Example 1.6. . Blow up X and Y in the origin, describe exactly the geometry
of the transforms X1 and Y1 and produce visualizations of X and X1 over R in all
coordinate charts. For Y1 the equations are in the x-chart 1 − xy 3 = z 3 x − w2 = 0
and in the y-chart x2 − y = z 3 y − w2 = 0.
Example 1.7. Blow up X1 and Y1 along their singular loci. Compute a resolution of X1 and compare it with the resolution of Y1 .
2. Lecture II: Varieties and Schemes
The following summary of basic concepts of algebraic geometry shall clarify the
terminology used in later sections. Detailed definitions are available in [Mum99,
Sha94, Har77, EH00, Liu02, Kem11, GW10, Gro61, ZS75, Nag75, Mat89, AM69].
Varieties
Definition 2.1. Write An = AnK for the affine n-space over some field K. The
points of An are identified with n-tuples a = (a1 , . . . , an ) of elements ai of K. The
space An is equipped with the Zariski topology: the closed sets are the algebraic
subsets of An , i.e., the zerosets V (I) = {a ∈ An , f (a) = 0 for all f ∈ I} of ideals I
of K[x1 , . . . , xn ].
To An one associates its coordinate ring, given as the polynomial ring K[An ] =
K[x1 , . . . , xn ] in n variables over K.
6
HERWIG HAUSER
Definition 2.2. A polynomial map f : An → Am between affine spaces is given
by a vector f = (f1 , . . . , fm ) of polynomials fi = fi (x) ∈ K[x1 , . . . , xn ]. It induces a
K-algebra homomorphism f ∗ : K[y1 , . . . , ym ] → K[x1 , . . . , xn ] sending yi to fi and
a polynomial h = h(y) to h ◦ f = h(f (x)). A rational map f : An → Am is given by
a vector f = (f1 , . . . , fm ) of elements fi ∈ K(x1 , . . . , xn ) = Quot(K[x1 , . . . , xn ]) in
the quotient field of K[x1 , . . . , xn ]. Albeit the terminology, a rational map need not
define a set-theoretic map on whole affine space An . It does this only on the open
subset U which is the complement of the union of the zerosets of the denominators
of the elements fi . The induced map f|U : U → Am is then called a regular map
on U .
Definition 2.3. An affine (algebraic) variety X is a subset of an affine space
An which is defined as the zeroset V (I) of a radical ideal I of K[x1 , . . . , xn ] and
equipped with the topology induced by the Zariski topology of An . It is thus a closed
subset of An . In this text, the ideal I need not be prime, hence X is not required
to be irreducible. The ideal IX of K[x1 , . . . , xn ] of all polynomials f vanishing on
X is the largest ideal such that X = V (IX ). If the field K is algebraically closed
and X = V (I) is defined by the radical ideal I, the ideal IX coincides with I by
Hilbert’s Nullstellensatz.
The (affine) coordinate ring of X is the factor ring K[X] = K[x1 , . . . , xn ]/IX .
As IX is radical, K[X] is reduced, i.e., has no nilpotent elements. If X is irreducible,
I is a prime ideal and K[X] is an integral domain. To each point a = (a1 , . . . , an ) of
X one associates the maximal ideal mX,a of K[X] generated by the residue classes
of the polynomials x1 − a1 , . . . , xn − an . If the field K is algebraically closed, this
defines, by Hilbert’s Nullstellensatz, a bijection of the points of X and the maximal
ideals of K[X].
The function field of an irreducible variety X is the quotient field K(X) =
Quot(K[X]).
The local ring of an affine variety X at a point a is the localization OX,a =
K[X]mX,a of K[X] at the maximal ideal mX,a of K[X] associated to a in X. It is
isomorphic to the factor ring OAn ,a /Ia of the local ring OAn ,a of An at a by the
ideal Ia generated by the ideal I defining X in OAn ,a . If Z ⊂ X is an irreducible
subvariety defined by the prime ideal pZ , the local ring OX,Z of OX along Z is
defined as the localization K[X]pZ . The local ring OX,a gives rise to the germ
(X, a) of X at a, see below. By abuse of notation, the (unique) maximal ideal
mX,a · OX,a of OX,a is also denoted by mX,a . The factor ring κa = OX,a /mX,a is
called the residue field of X at a.
Definition 2.4. A principal open subset of an affine variety X is the complement in X of the zeroset V (g) of a single non-zero divisor g of K[X]. Principal
open subsets are thus dense in X. They form a basis of the Zariski-topology. A
quasi-affine variety is an open subset of an affine variety. A (closed) subvariety of
an affine variety X is a subset Y of X which is defined as the zeroset Y = V (J) of
an ideal J of K[X]. It is thus a closed subset of X.
Definition 2.5. Write Pn = PnK for the projective n-space over some field
K. The points of Pn are identified with equivalence classes of (n + 1)-tuples
a = (a0 , . . . , an ) of elements ai of K, where a ∼ b if a = λ·b for some non-zero λ ∈ K.
Points are given by their projective coordinates (a0 : . . . : an ), with ai ∈ K and not
all zero. Projective space Pn is equipped with the Zariski topology whose closed sets
BLOWUPS AND RESOLUTION
7
are the algebraic subsets of Pn , i.e., the zerosets V (I) = {a ∈ Pn , f (a0 , . . . , an ) = 0
for all f ∈ I} of homogeneous ideals I of K[x0 , . . . , xn ] different from the ideal generated by x0 , . . . , xn . As I is generated by homogeneous polynomials, the definition of
V (I) does not depend on the choice of the affine representatives (a0 , . . . , an ) ∈ An+1
of the points a. Projective space is covered by the affine open subsets Ui ' An
formed by the points whose i-th projective coordinate does not vanish (i = 0, . . . , n).
The homogeneous coordinate ring of Pn is the graded polynomial ring K[Pn ] =
K[x0 , . . . , xn ] in n + 1 variables over K, the grading being given by the degree.
Definition 2.6. A projective algebraic variety X is a subset of projective space
Pn defined as the zeroset V (I) of a homogeneous radical ideal I of K[x0 , . . . , xn ]
and equipped with the topology induced by the Zariski topology of Pn . It is thus
a closed algebraic subset of Pn . The ideal IX of K[x0 , . . . , xn ] of all homogeneous
polynomials f which vanish at all (affine representatives of) points of X is the
largest ideal such that X = V (IX ). If the field K is algebraically closed and
X = V (I) is defined by the radical ideal I, the ideal IX coincides with I by
Hilbert’s Nullstellensatz.
The homogeneous coordinate ring of X is the graded factor ring K[X] =
K[x0 , . . . , xn ]/IX equipped with the grading given by degree.
Definition 2.7. A principal open subset of a projective variety X is the complement of the zeroset V (g) of a single homogeneous non-zero divisor g of K[X]. A
quasi-projective variety is an open subset of a projective variety. A (closed) subvariety of a projective variety X is a subset Y of X which is defined as the zeroset
Y = V (J) of a homogeneous ideal J of K[X]. It is thus a closed algebraic subset
of X.
Remark 2.8. Abstract algebraic varieties are obtained by gluing affine algebraic varieties along principal open subsets, cf. [Mum99] I, §3, §4, [Sha94] V, §3.
This allows to develop the category of algebraic varieties with the usual constructions therein. All subsequent definitions could be formulated for abstract algebraic
varieties, but will only be developed in the affine or quasi-affine case to keep things
simple.
Definition 2.9. Let X and Y be two affine or quasi-affine algebraic varieties X ⊂ An and Y ⊂ Am . A regular map or (regular) morphism from X to
Y is a map f : X → Am sending X into Y with components rational functions
fi ∈ K(x1 , . . . , xn ) whose denominators do not vanish on X. If X and Y are affine
varieties, a morphism induces a K-algebra homomorphism f ∗ : K[Y ] → K[X] between the coordinate rings, which, in turn, determines f . Over algebraically closed
fields, a morphism between affine varieties is the restriction to X of a polynomial
map f : An → Am sending X into Y , i.e., such that f ∗ (IY ) ⊂ IX , [Har77], chap. I,
Thm. 3.2, p. 17.
Definition 2.10. A rational map f : X → Y between affine varieties is a
morphism f : U → Y on some dense open subset U of X. One then says that f
is defined on U . Albeit the terminology, it need not induce a set-theoretic map
on whole X. For irreducible varieties, a rational map is given by a K-algebra
homomorphism αf : K(Y ) → K(X) of the function fields. A birational map f :
X → Y is a regular map f : U → Y on some dense open subset U of X such that
V = f (U ) is open in Y and such that f|U : U → V is a regular isomorphism, i.e.,
8
HERWIG HAUSER
admits an inverse morphism. In this case U and V are called biregularly isomorphic,
and X and Y are birationally isomorphic. For irreducible varieties, a birational map
is given by an isomorphism αf : K(Y ) → K(X) of the function fields. A birational
morphism f : X → Y is a birational map which is defined on whole X, i.e., a
morphism f : X → Y which admits a rational inverse map defined on a dense open
subset V of Y .
Definition 2.11. A morphism f : X → Y between algebraic varieties is called
separated if the diagonal ∆ ⊂ X ×Y X is closed in the fibre product X ×Y X =
{(a, b) ∈ X × X, f (a) = f (b)}. A morphism f : X → Y between varieties is proper
if it is separated and universally closed, i.e., if for any variety Z and morphism
Z → Y the induced morphism g : X ×Y Z → Z is closed. Closed immersions and
compositions of proper morphisms are proper.
Definition 2.12. The germ of a variety X at a point a, denoted by (X, a), is
the equivalence class of open neighbourhoods U of a in X where two neighbourhoods
of a are said to be equivalent if they coincide on a (possibly smaller) neighbourhood
of a. To a germ (X, a) one associates the local ring OX,a of X at a, i.e., the
localization OX,a = K[X]mX,a of the coordinate ring K[X] of X at the maximal
ideal mX,a of K[X] defining a in X.
Definition 2.13. Let X and Y be two varieties, and let a and b be points of
X and Y . The germ of a morphism f : (X, a) → (Y, b) at a is the equivalence class
of a morphism fe : U → Y defined on an open neighbourhood U of a in X and
sending a to b; here, two morphisms defined on neighbourhoods of a in X are said
to be equivalent if they coincide on a (possibly smaller) neighbourhood of a. The
morphism fe : U → Y is called a representative of f on U . Equivalently, the germ of
a morphism is given by a local K-algebra homomorphism αf = f ∗ : OY,b → OX,a .
Definition 2.14. The tangent space Ta X to a variety X at a point a is defined
as the K-vector space
2
2
Ta X = (mX,a /mX,a
)∗ = Hom(mX,a /mX,a
, K)
with mX,a ⊂ K[X] the maximal ideal of a. Equivalently, one may take the maximal
ideal of the local ring OX,a . The tangent space of X at a thus only depends on the
germ of X at a. The tangent map Ta f : Ta X → Tb Y of a morphism f : X → Y
sending a point a ∈ X to b ∈ Y or of a germ f : (X, a) → (Y, b) is defined as the
linear map induced naturally by f ∗ : OY,b → OX,a .
Definition 2.15. The embedding dimension embdima X of a variety X at a
point a is defined as the K-dimension of Ta X.
Schemes
Definition 2.16. An affine scheme X is a commutative ring R with 1, called
the coordinate ring or ring of global sections of X. The set Spec(R), also denoted
by X and called the spectrum of R, is defined as the set of prime ideals of R. Here,
R does not count as a prime ideal, but 0 does if it is prime, i.e., if R is an integral
domain. A point of X is an element of Spec(R). In this way, R is the underlying
algebraic structure of an affine scheme, whereas X = Spec(R) is the associated
geometric object. To be more precise, one would have to define X as the pair
consisting of the coordinate ring R and the spectrum Spec(R).
BLOWUPS AND RESOLUTION
9
The spectrum is equipped with the Zariski topology: the closed sets V (I) are
formed by the prime ideals containing a given ideal I of R. It also comes with a
sheaf of rings OX , the structure sheaf of X, whose stalks at points of X are the
localizations of R at the respective prime ideals [Mum99, Har77, Sha94]. For affine
schemes, the sheaf OX is completely determined by the ring R. In particular, to
define affine schemes it is not mandatory to introduce sheaves or locally ringed
spaces.
An affine scheme is of finite type over some field K if its coordinate ring R is a
finitely generated K-algebra, i.e., a factor ring K[x1 , . . . , xn ]/I of a polynomial ring
by some ideal I. If I is radical, the scheme is called reduced. Over algebraically
closed fields, affine varieties can be identified with reduced affine schemes of finite
type over K [Har77], chap. II, Prop. 2.6, p. 78.
Definition 2.17. As a scheme, affine n-space over some field K is defined
as the scheme An = AnK given by the polynomial ring K[x1 , . . . , xn ] over K in n
variables. Its underlying topological space An = Spec(K[x1 , . . . , xn ]) consists of
the prime ideals of K[x1 , . . . , xn ]. The points of An when considered as a scheme
therefore correspond to the irreducible subvarieties of An when considered as an
affine variety. A point is closed if the respective prime ideal is a maximal ideal.
Over algebraically closed fields, the closed points of An as a scheme correspond, by
Hilbert’s Nullstellensatz, to the points of An as a variety.
Definition 2.18. Let X be an affine scheme of coordinate ring R. A closed
subscheme Y of X is a factor ring S = R/I of R by some ideal I of R, together
with the canonical homomorphism R → R/I. The set Y = Spec(R/I) of prime
ideals of R/I can be identified with the closed subset V (I) of X = Spec(R) of
prime ideals of R containing I. The homomorphism R → R/I induces an injective
continuous map Y → X between the underlying topological spaces. In this way,
the Zariski topology of Y as a scheme coincides with the topology induced by the
Zariski topology of X.
A point a of X is a prime ideal I of R, considered as an element of Spec(R). To
a point one may associate a closed subscheme of X via the spectrum of the factor
ring R/I. The point a is called closed if I is a maximal ideal of R.
A principal open subset of X is an affine scheme U defined by the ring of
fractions Rg of R with respect to the multiplicatively closed set {1, g, g 2 , . . .} for
some non-zero divisor g ∈ R. The natural ring homomorphism R → Rg sending h
to h/1 interprets U = Spec(Rg ) as an open subset of X = Spec(R). Principal open
subsets form a basis of the Zariski topology of X. Arbitary open subsets of X need
not admit an interpretation as affine schemes.
Remark 2.19. Abstract schemes are obtained by gluing affine schemes along
principal open subsets [Mum99] II, §1, §2, [Har77] II.2, [Sha94] V, §3. Here, two
principal open subsets will be identified or patched together if their respective
coordinate rings are isomorphic. This works out properly because the passage from
a ring R to its ring of fractions Rg satisfies two key algebraic properties: An element
h of R is determined by its images in Rg , for all g, and, given elements hg in the
rings Rg whose images in Rgg0 coincide for all g and g 0 , there exists an element h in
R with image hg in Rg , for all g. This allows in particular to equip arbitrary open
subsets of (affine) schemes X with a natural structure of a scheme, which will then
be called open subscheme of X.
10
HERWIG HAUSER
The gluing of affine schemes along principal open sets can also be formulated
on the sheaf-theoretic level, even though, again, this is not mandatory. For local
considerations, one can mostly restrict to the case of affine schemes.
Definition 2.20. A morphism f : X → Y between affine schemes X =
Spec(R) and Y = Spec(S) is a (unitary) ring homomorphism α = αf : S → R. It
induces a continuous map Spec(R) → Spec(S) between the underlying topological
spaces by sending a prime ideal I of R to the prime ideal α−1 (I) of S. Morphisms
between arbitary schemes are defined by choosing coverings by affine schemes and
defining the morphism locally subject to the obvious conditions on the overlaps of
the patches. A rational map f : X → Y between schemes is a morphism f : U → Y
defined on a dense open subscheme U of X. It need not be defined on whole X.
A rational map is birational if the morphism f : U → Y admits on a dense open
subscheme V of Y an inverse morphism V → U , i.e., if f|U : U → V is an isomorphism. A birational morphism f : X → Y is a morphism f : X → Y which is also
a birational map, i.e., induces an isomorphism U → V of dense open subschemes.
In contrast to birational maps, a birational morphism is defined on whole X, while
its inverse map is only defined on a dense open subset of Y .
L∞
Definition 2.21. Let R = i=0 Ri be a graded ring. The set X = Proj(R) of
homogeneous prime ideals of R not containing the irrelevant ideal M = ⊕∞
i≥1 Ri is
equipped with a topology, the Zariski topology, and with a sheaf of rings OX , the
structure sheaf of X [Mum99, Har77, Sha94]. It thus becomes a scheme. Typically,
R is generated as an R0 -algebra by the homogeneous elements g ∈ R1 of degree 1.
An open covering of X is then given by the affine schemes Xg = Spec(Rg◦ ), where
Rg◦ denotes, for any non-zero divisor g ∈ R1 , the subring of elements of degree 0 in
the ring of fractions Rg .
Remark 2.22. A graded ring homomorphism S → R induces a morphism of
schemes Proj(R) → Proj(S).
Definition 2.23. Equip the polynomial ring K[x0 , . . . , xn ] with the natural
grading given by the degree. The scheme Proj(K[x0 , . . . , xn ]) is called n-dimensional projective space over K, denoted by Pn = PnK . It is is covered by the affine open
subschemes Ui ' An which are defined through the principal open sets associated
to the rings of fractions K[x0 , . . . , xn ]xi (i = 0, . . . , n).
Definition 2.24. A morphism f : X → Y is called projective if it factors, for
some k, into a closed embedding X ,→ Y ×Pk followed by the projection Y ×Pk → Y
onto the first factor [Har77] II.4, p. 103.
Formal germs
Definition 2.25. Let R be a ring and I an ideal of R. The powers I k of I
induce natural homomorphisms R/I k+1 → R/I k . The I-adic completion of R is
b = lim R/I k , together with the canonical homomorphism R → R.
b
the inverse limit R
←−
b
If R is a local ring with maximal ideal m, the m-adic completion R is called the
c of M
completion of R. For an R-module M , one defines the I-adic completion M
c = lim M/I k · M .
as the inverse limit M
←−
Lemma 2.26. Let R be a noetherian ring with prime ideal I and I-adic comb
pletion R.
BLOWUPS AND RESOLUTION
11
b then Jb = J · R
b
(1) If J is another ideal of R with (I ∩ J)-adic completion J,
d ' R/
b J.
b
and R/J
c1 · J
c2 .
(2) If J1 , J2 are two ideals of R and J = J1 · J2 , then Jb = J
b is a noetherian
(3) If R is a local ring with maximal ideal m, the completion R
b
local ring with maximal ideal m
b = m · R, and m
b ∩ R = m.
T
(4) If J is an arbitrary ideal of a local ring R, then Jb ∩ R = i≥0 (J + m i ).
(5) Passing to the I-adic completion defines an exact functor on finitely generated R-modules.
b is a faithfully flat R-algebra.
(6) R
c = M ⊗R R.
b
(7) If M a finitely generated R-module, then M
Proof. (1) By [ZS75] VIII, Thm. 6, Cor. 2, p. 258, it suffices toTverify that J
is closed in the (I ∩ J)-adic topology. The closure J of J equals J = i≥0 (J + (I ∩
J)i ) = J by [ZS75] VIII, Lemma 1, p. 253.
b = J1 · R
b · J2 · R
b = Jb1 · Jb2 .
(2) By definition, Jb = J1 · J2 · R
b
(3), (4) The ring R is noetherian and local by [AM69] Prop. 10.26, p. 113, and
Prop. 10.16, p. 109. The ideal Ib∩R equals the closure I of I in the m-adic topology.
T
Thus, Ib ∩ R = i≥0 (I + m i ) and m
b ∩ R = m.
(5) – (7) [AM69] Prop. 10.12, p. 108, Prop. 10.14, p. 109, Prop. 10.14, p. 109,
and [Mat89], Thm. 8.14, p. 62.
Definition 2.27. Let X be a variety and let a be a point of X. The local
ring OX,a of X at a is equipped with the mX,a -adic topology whose basis of neighk
bourhoods of 0 is given by the powers mX,a
of the maximal ideal mX,a of OX,a .
bX,a of OX,a is called the complete local ring of X at a
The induced completion O
bX,a is called the formal
[Nag75] II, [ZS75] VIII, §1, §2. The scheme defined by O
b a). If X = An is the affine
neighbourhood or formal germ of X at a, denoted by (X,
K
bAn ,a is isomorphic as a local K-algebra to
n-space over K, the complete local ring O
the formal power series ring K[[x1 , . . . , xn ]] in n variables over K. The natural ring
bX,a defines a morphism (X,
b a) → (X, a) in the category
homomorphism OX,a → O
of schemes from the formal neighbourhood to the germ of X at a. A formal subvab a), also called a formal local subvariety of X at a, is (the scheme
riety (Yb , a) of (X,
bX,a /I for an ideal I of O
bX,a .
defined by) a factor ring O
2
2
b a) of the
As mX,a /mX,a ' m
b X,a /m
b X,a , one defines the tangent space Ta (X,
formal germ as the tangent space Ta (X) of the variety at a.
b a) → (Yb , b) between two formal germs is defined as a local
A map f : (X,
bY,b → O
bX,a . It is also called a formal map between
algebra homomorphism αf : O
X and Y at a. It induces in a natural way a linear map, the tangent map, Ta f :
Ta X → Tb Y between the tangent spaces.
Two varieties X and Y are formally isomorphic at points a ∈ X, respectively
bX,a and O
bY,b are isomorphic. If X ⊂ An and
b ∈ Y , if the complete local rings O
n
Y ⊂ A are subvarieties of the same affine space An over K, and a = b = 0,
this is equivalent to saying that there is a local algebra automorphism of OAn ,0 '
K[[x1 , . . . , xn ]] sending the completed ideals Ib and Jb of X and Y onto each other.
Such an automorphism is also called a formal coordinate change of An at 0. It is
given by a vector of n formal power series without constant term whose Jacobian
matrix of partial derivatives is invertible when evaluated at 0.
12
HERWIG HAUSER
Remark 2.28. The inverse function theorem does not hold for algebraic varieties and regular maps between them, but it holds in the category of formal germs
b a) → (Yb , b) is an isomorphism if and only
and formal maps: A formal map f : (X,
if its tangent map Ta f : Ta X → Tb Y is a linear isomorphism.
Definition 2.29. A morphism f : X → Y between varieties is called étale
b a) → (Yb , f (a)) are
if for all a ∈ X the induced maps of formal germs f : (X,
isomorphisms, or, equivalently, if all tangent maps Ta f of f are isomorphisms,
[Har77], chap. III, ex. 10.3 and 10.4, p. 275.
Definition 2.30. A morphism f : X → Y between varieties is called smooth
b a) → (Yb , f (a)) are
if for all a ∈ X the induced maps of formal germs f : (X,
submersions, i.e., if the tangent maps Ta f of f are surjective, [Har77], chap. III,
Prop. 10.4, p. 270.
Remark 2.31. The category of formal germs and formal maps admits the usual
concepts and constructions as e.g. the decomposition of a variety in irreducible
components, intersections of germs, inverse images, or fibre products. Similarly,
when working of R, C or any complete valued field K, one can develop, based on
rings of convergent power series, the category of analytic varieties and analytic
spaces, respectively of their germs, and analytic maps between them [dJP00].
Examples
Example 2.32. Compare the algebraic varieties X satisfying (X, a) ' (Ad , 0)
for all points a ∈ X (where ' stands for biregularly isomorphic germs) with those
b d , 0). Varieties with the first
b a) ' (A
where the isomorphism is just formal, (X,
property are called plain, cf. def. 3.11.
Example 2.33. It can be shown that any complex regular (def. 3.4) and rational
surface (i.e., a surface which is birationally isomorphic to the affine plane A2 over C)
is plain, [BHSV08] Prop. 3.2. Show directly that X defined in A3 by x−(x2 +z 2 )y =
0 is plain by exhibiting a local isomorphism (i.e., isomorphism of germs) of X at 0
with A2 at 0. Is there an algorithm to construct such a local isomorphism for any
complex regular and rational surface?
Example 2.34. . Let X be an algebraic variety and a ∈ X be a point. What
is the difference between the concept of regular system of parameters (def. 3.2) in
bX,a ?
OX,a and O
b n , a) of affine space An at a
Example 2.35. The formal neighbourhood (A
bAn ,a ' K[[x1 −
point a = (a1 , . . . , an ) is given by the formal power series ring O
n
a1 , . . . , xn − an ]]. If X ⊂ A is an affine algebraic variety defined by the ideal
b a) is given by the factor ring
I of K[x1 , . . . , xn ], the formal neighbourhood (X,
bX,a = O
bAn ,a /Ib ' K[[x1 − a1 , . . . , xn − an ]]/I,
b where Ib = I · O
bAn ,a denotes the
O
b
n
extension of I to OA ,a .
Example 2.36. The map f : A1 → A2 given by t 7→ (t2 , t3 ) is a regular
morphism which induces a birational isomorphism onto the curve X in A2 defined
by x3 = y 2 . The inverse (x, y) 7→ y/x is a rational map on X and regular on X \{0}.
BLOWUPS AND RESOLUTION
13
Example 2.37. The map f : A1 → A2 given by t 7→ (t2 − 1, t(t2 − 1)) is a
regular morphism which induces a birational isomorphism onto the curve X in A2
defined by x2 + x3 = y 2 . The inverse (x, y) 7→ y/x is a rational map on X and
regular on X \ {0}. The germ (X, 0) of X at 0 is not isomorphic to the germ (Y, 0)
of the union Y of the two diagonals in A2 defined by x2 √
= y 2 . The formal germs
b
b
(X, 0) and (Y , 0) are isomorphic via the map (x, y) 7→ (x 1 + x, y).
Example 2.38. . The map f : A2 → A2 given by (x, y) 7→ (xy, y) is a birational
morphism with inverse the rational map (x, y) 7→ ( xy , y). The inverse defines a
regular morphism outside the x-axis.
Example 2.39. The maps ϕij : An+1 → An+1 given by
x0
xi−1
xi+1
xn
(x0 , . . . , xn ) 7→ ( , . . . ,
, 1,
,...,
).
xj
xj
xj
xj
are birational maps for each i, j = 0, . . . , n. They are the transition maps between
the affine charts Uj = Pn \ V (xj ) ' An of projective space Pn .
Example 2.40. . The maps ϕij : An → An given by
x
xi−1 1 xi+1
xj−1
xj+1
xn
1
,...,
, ,
,...,
, xi xj ,
,...,
(x1 , . . . , xn ) 7→
xj
xj xj xj
xj
xj
xj
are birational maps for i, j = 1, . . . , n. They are the transition maps between the
e n ⊂ An × Pn−1 of An at the origin (cf. Lecture IV) .
affine charts of the blowup A
Example 2.41. . Assume that the characteristic of the ground field is different
from 2. The elliptic curve X defined in A2 by y 2 = x3 − x is formally isomorphic at
b 1 , 0), whereas the germs (X, a) are not biregularly isomorphic
each point a of X to (A
1
to (A , 0).
Example 2.42. . The projection (x, y) 7→ x from the hyperbola X defined in
A2 by xy = 1 to the x-axis A1 = A1 × {0} ⊂ A2 has open image A1 \ {0}. In
particular, it is not proper.
Example 2.43. . The curves X and Y defined in A2 by x3 = y 2 , respectively
x = y 2 are not formally isomorphic to each other at 0, whereas the curve Z defined
in A2 by x3 + x5 = y 2 is formally isomorphic to X at 0.
5
3. Lecture III: Singularities
Let X be an affine algebraic variety defined over a field K. Analog concepts to the
ones given below can be defined for abstract varieties and schemes.
Definition 3.1. A noetherian local ring R with maximal ideal m is called a
regular ring if m can be generated by n elements, where n is the Krull dimension
of R. The number n is then given as the vector space dimension of m/m 2 over the
residue field R/m. A noetherian local ring R is regular if and only if its completion
b is regular, [AM69] p. 123.
R
Definition 3.2. Let R be a noetherian regular local ring with maximal ideal m.
A minimal set of generators x1 , . . . , xn of m is called a regular system of parameters
or local coordinate system of R.
Remark 3.3. A regular system of parameters of a local ring R is also a regular
b but not conversely, cf. ex. 3.27.
system of parameters of its completion R,
14
HERWIG HAUSER
Definition 3.4. A point a of X is a regular or non-singular point of X if the
local ring OX,a of X at a is a regular ring. Equivalently, the mX,a -adic complebX,a of OX,a is isomorphic to the completion O
bAd ,0 ' K[[x1 , . . . , xd ]] of the
tion O
d
local ring of some affine space A at 0. Otherwise a is called a singular point or
a singularity of X. The set of singular points of X is denoted by Sing(X), its
complement by Reg(X). The variety X is regular or non-singular if all its points
are regular. Over perfect fields regular varieties are the same as smooth varieties,
[Cut04, Liu02].
Proposition 3.5. A subvariety X of a regular variety W is regular at a if and
only if there are local coordinates x1 , . . . , xn of W at a so that X can be defined
locally at a by x1 = · · · = xk = 0 where k is the codimension of X in W at a.
Proof. [dJP00] Cor. 4.3.20, p. 155.
Remark 3.6. Affine and projective space are regular at each of their points.
The germ of a variety at a regular point need not be biregularly isomorphic to the
germ of an affine space at 0. However, it is formally isomorphic, i.e., after passage
to the formal germ, cf. ex. 3.28.
Proposition 3.7. Assume that the field K is perfect. Let X be a hypersurface
defined in a regular variety W by the square-free equation f = 0. The point a ∈ X
is singular if and only if all partial derivatives ∂x1 f, . . . , ∂xn f of vanish at a.
Proof. [Zar47] Thm. 7, [Har77] I.5, [dJP00] 4.3.
Definition 3.8. The characterization of singularities by the vanishing of the
partial derivatives as in Prop. 3.7 is known as the Jacobian criterion for smoothness.
Remark 3.9. A similar statement holds for irreducible varieties which are
not hypersurfaces, using instead of the partial derivatives the k × k-minors of the
Jacobian matrix of a system of equations of X in W , with k the codimension of
X in W at a [dJP00], [Cut04] pp. 7-8, [Liu02] pp. 128 and 142. The choice of the
system of defining polynomials of the variety is significant: The ideal generated by
them has to be radical, otherwise the concept of singularity has to be developed
scheme-theoretically, allowing non-reduced schemes. Over non-perfect fields, the
criterion of the proposition does not hold [Zar47].
Corollary 3.10. The singular locus Sing(X) of X is closed in X.
Definition 3.11. A point a of X is a plain point of X if the local ring OX,a
is isomorphic to the local ring OAd ,0 ' K[x1 , . . . , xd ](x1 ,...,xd ) of some affine space
Ad at 0 (with d the dimension of X at a). Equivalently, there exists an open
neighbourhood U of a in X which is biregularly isomorphic to an open subset V of
some affine space Ad . The variety X is plain if all its points are plain.
Theorem 3.12. (Bodnár-Hauser-Schicho-Villamayor) The blowup of a plain
variety defined over an infinite field along a regular center is again plain.
Proof. [BHSV08] Thm. 4.3.
Definition 3.13. An irreducible variety X is rational if it has a dense open
subset U which is biregularly isomorphic to a dense open subset V of some affine
space Ad . Equivalently, the function field K(X) = Quot(K[X]) is isomorphic to the
field of rational functions K(x1 , . . . , xd ) of Ad .
BLOWUPS AND RESOLUTION
15
Remark 3.14. A plain complex variety is smooth and rational. The converse
is true for curves and surfaces, and unknown in arbitrary dimension [BHSV08].
Definition 3.15. A point a is a normal crossings point of X if the formal
b a) is isomorphic to the formal neighbourhood (Yb , 0) of a union
neighbourhood (X,
Y of coordinate subspaces of An at 0. The point a is a simple normal crossings
point of X if it is a normal crossings point and all components of X passing through
a are regular at a. The variety X has normal crossings, respectively simple normal
crossings, if the property holds at all of its points.
Remark 3.16. In the case of schemes, a normal crossings scheme may be
non-reduced in which case the components of the scheme Y are equipped with multiplicities. Equivalently, Y is defined locally at 0 in An up to a formal isomorphism
by a monomial ideal of K[x1 , . . . , xn ].
Proposition 3.17. A point a is a normal crossings point of a subvariety X of a
regular ambient variety W if and only if there exists a regular system of parameters
x1 , . . . , xn of OW,a so that the germ (X, a) is defined in (W, a) by a radical monomial
ideal in x1 , . . . , xn . This is equivalent to saying that each component of (X, a) is
defined by a subset of the coordinates.
Remark 3.18. In the case of schemes, the monomial ideal need not be radical.
Definition 3.19. Two subvarieties X and Y of a regular ambient variety W
meet transversally at a point a of W if they are regular at a and if the union X ∪ Y
has normal crossings at a.
Remark 3.20. The definition differs from the corresponding notion in differential geometry, where it is required that the tangent spaces of the two varieties
at intersection points sum up to the tangent space of the ambient variety at the
respective point. In the present text, an inclusion Y ⊂ X of two regular varieties is
considered as being transversal, and also any two coordinate subspaces in An meet
transversally. In the case of schemes, the union X ∪ Y has to be defined by the
product of the defining ideals, not their intersection.
Definition 3.21. A variety X is a cartesian product, if there exist positive
dimensional varieties Y and Z such that X is biregularly isomorphic to Y × Z.
b a) (the cartesian
Analogous definitions hold for germs (X, a) and formal germs (X,
product of formal germs has to be taken in the category of complete local rings).
Definition 3.22. A variety X is (formally) a cylinder over a subvariety Z ⊂ X
b a) is isomorphic to a cartesian
at a point a of Z if the formal neighborhood (X,
b
b
product (Y , a) × (Z, a) for some (positive-dimensional) subvariety Y of X which
is regular at a. One also says that X is trivial or a cylinder along Y at a with
transversal section Z.
Definition 3.23. Let X and F be varieties, and let 0 be a distinguished point
b a) is isomorphic
on F . The set S of points a of X where the formal neighborhood (X,
to (Fb, 0) is called the triviality locus of X of singularity type (Fb, 0).
Theorem 3.24. (Ephraim, Hauser-Müller) For any complex variety F and
point 0 on F , the triviality locus S of X of singularity type (Fb, 0) is locally closed
and regular in X, and X is a cylinder along S. Any subvariety Z of X such that
b a) ' (S,
b a) × (Z,
b a) is unique up to formal isomorphism at a.
(X,
16
HERWIG HAUSER
Proof. [Eph78] Thm. 2.1, [HM89] Thm. 1.
Corollary 3.25. The singular locus Sing(X) and the non-normal crossings
locus of a variety X are closed subvarieties.
Proof. [Mum99] III.4, Prop. 3, p. 170, [Bod04].
Theorem 3.26. (Hauser-Müller) Let X, Y and Z be complex varieties with
points a, b and c on them, respectively. The formal germs of X × Z at (a, c) and
b a) and (Yb , b) are isomorphic.
Y × Z at (b, c) are isomorphic if and only if (X,
Proof. [HM90], Thm. 1.
Examples
√
Example 3.27. . The element x 1 + x is a regular parameter of the completion
K[[x]] of the local ring K[x](x) which does not stem from a regular parameter of
K[x](x) .
Example 3.28. . The elements y 2 − x3 − x and y form a regular parameter
system of OA2 ,0 but the zeroset X of y 2 = x3 − x is not locally at 0 isomorphic to
b 1 , 0).
b 0) is formally isomorphic to (A
A1 . However, (X,
Example 3.29. The set of plain points of a variety X is Zariski open (cf. def.
3.11).
Example 3.30. Let X be the plane cubic curve defined by x3 + x2 − y 2 = 0
in A2 . The origin 0 ∈ X is a normal crossings point, but X is not locally at 0
biregularly isomorphic to the union of the two diagonals of A2 defined by x = ±y.
Example 3.31. . Let X be the complex surface in A3C defined by x2 − y 2 z = 0,
the Whitney umbrella or pinch point singularity. The singular locus is the z-axis.
The origin is not a normal crossings point of X. For a 6= 0 a point on the z-axis,
a is a normal crossings point but not a simple normal crossings point of X. The
formal neighbourhoods of X at points a 6= 0 on the z-axis are isomorphic to each
other, since they are isomorphic to the formal neighbourhood at 0 of the union of
two transversal planes in A3 .
Example 3.32. Prove that the non-normal crossings locus of a variety is closed.
Try to find equations for it [Bod04].
Example 3.33. + Find a local invariant that measures reasonably the distance
of a point a of X from being a normal crossings point.
Example 3.34. . Do the varieties defined by the following equations have normal crossings, respectively simple normal crossings, at the origin? Vary the ground
field.
(a) x2 + y 2 = 0,
(b) x2 − y 2 = 0,
(c) x2 + y 2 + z 2 = 0,
(d) x2 + y 2 + z 2 + w2 = 0,
(e) xy(x − y) = 0,
(f) xy(x2 − y) = 0,
(g) (x − y)z(z − x) = 0.
BLOWUPS AND RESOLUTION
17
Example 3.35. . Visualize the zeroset of (x − y 2 )(x − z)z = 0 in A3R .
Example 3.36. + Formulate and then prove the theorem of local analytic
triviality in positive characteristic, cf. Thm. 1 of [HM89].
Example 3.37. Find a coordinate free description of normal crossings singularities. Find an algorithm that tests for normal crossings [Fab11, Fab12].
Example 3.38. . The singular locus of a cartesian product X × Y is the union
of Sing(X) × Y and X × Sing(Y ).
S
Example 3.39. . Call a finite union X = Xi of regular varieties mikado if all
possible intersections of the components Xi are (scheme-theoretically) regular. The
intersections are defined by the sums of the ideals, not taking their radical. Find
the simplest example of a variety which is not mikado but for which all pairwise
intersections are non-singular.
Example 3.40. Interpret the family given by taking the germs of a variety
X at varying points a ∈ X as the germs of the fibers of a morphism of varieties,
equipped with a section.
4. Lecture IV: Blowups
Blowups, also known as monoidal transformations, can be introduced in several
ways. The respective equivalences will be proven in the second half of this section.
All varietes are reduced but not necessarily irreducible, and subvarieties are closed
if not mentioned differently. Schemes will be noetherian but not necessarily of finite
type over a field. To ease the exposition they are often assumed to be affine, i.e.,
of the form X = Spec(R) for some ring R. Points of varieties are closed, points
of schemes can also be non-closed. The coordinate ring of an affine variety X is
denoted by K[X] and the structure sheaf of a scheme X by OX , with local rings
OX,a at points a ∈ X.
References providing additional material on blowups are, among many others,
[Hir64], chap. III, and [EH00], chap. IV.2.
Definition 4.1. A subvariety Z of a variety X is called a hypersurface in X
if the codimension of Z in X at any point a of Z is 1,
dima Z = dima X − 1.
Remark 4.2. In the case where X is non-singular and irreducible, a hypersurface is locally defined at any point a by a single non-trivial equation, i.e., an
equation given by a non-zero and non-invertible element h of OX,a . This need not
be the case for singular varieties, see ex. 4.21. Hypersurfaces are a particular case
of effective Weil divisors [Har77] chap. II, Rmk. 6.17.1, p. 145.
Definition 4.3. A subvariety Z of an irreducible variety X is called a Cartier
divisor in X at a point a ∈ Z if Z can be defined locally at a by a single equation
h = 0 for some non-zero element h ∈ OX,a . If X is not assumed to be irreducible, h
is required to be a non-zero divisor of OX,a . This excludes the possibility that Z is
a component or a union of components of X. The subvariety Z is called a Cartier
divisor in X if it is a Cartier divisor at each of its points. The empty subvariety is
considered as a Cartier divisor. A (non-empty) Cartier divisor is a hypersurface in
X, but not conversely, and its complement X \ Z is dense in X. Cartier divisors
18
HERWIG HAUSER
are, in a certain sense, the largest closed and properly contained subvarieties of X.
If Z is Cartier in X, the ideal I defining Z in X is called locally principal [Har77]
chap. II, Prop. 6.13, p. 144, [EH00] III.2.5, p. 117.
Definition 4.4. (Blowup via universal property) Let Z be a (closed) subvariety
e together with a morphism π : X
e → X is called a blowup
of a variety X. A variety X
of X with center Z of X, or a blowup of X along Z, if the inverse image E = π −1 (Z)
e and π is universal with respect to this property: For
of Z is a Cartier divisor in X
0
any morphism τ : X → X such that τ −1 (Z) is a Cartier divisor in X 0 , there exists
e so that τ factors through σ, say τ = π ◦ σ,
a unique morphism σ : X 0 → X
∃1 σ
e
X 0 H_ _ _ _/ X
HH
HH τ
HH
HH π
H#
X
e is a Cartier
The morphism π is also called the blowup map. The subvariety E of X
divisor, in particular a hypersurface, and called the exceptional divisor or exceptional locus of the blowup. One says that π contracts E to Z.
Remark 4.5. By the universal property, a blowup of X along Z, if it exists,
is unique up to unique isomorphism. It is therefore called the blowup of X along
e = X and π is the identity by the
Z. If Z is already a Cartier divisor in X, then X
universal property. In particular, this is the case when X is non-singular and Z is
a hypersurface in X.
Definition 4.6. The Rees algebra of an ideal I of a commutative ring R is the
graded R-algebra
∞
∞
M
M
Rees(I) =
Ii =
I i · ti ⊂ R[t],
i=0
i=0
where I i denotes the i-fold power of I, with I 0 set equal to R. The variable t is
e for Rees(I)
given degree 1 so that the elements of I i · ti have degree i. Write R
when I is clear from the context. The Rees algebra of I is generated by elements
e by sending an element g of R to the
of degree 1, and R embeds naturally into R
degree 0 element g · t0 . If I is finitely generated by elements g1 , . . . , gk ∈ R, then
e = R[g1 t, . . . , gk t]. The Rees algebras of the zero-ideal I = 0 and of the whole ring
R
I = R equal R, respectively R[t]. If I is a principal ideal generated by a non-zero
e and Spec(R) are isomorphic. The Rees algebras
divisor of R, the schemes Proj(R)
of an ideal I and its k-th power I k are isomorphic as graded R-algebras, for any
k ≥ 1.
Definition 4.7. (Blowup via Rees algebra) Let X = Spec(R) be an affine
scheme and let Z = Spec(R/I) be a closed subscheme of X defined by an ideal
e = Rees(I) the Rees algebra of I over R, equipped with the
I of R. Denote by R
e = Proj(R)
e together
induced grading. The blowup of X along Z is the scheme X
e → X given by the natural ring homomorphism R → R.
e
with the morphism π : X
e is called the exceptional divisor of the blowup.
The subscheme E = π −1 (Z) of X
Definition 4.8. (Blowup via secants) Let W = An be affine space over K
(taken as a variety) and let p be a fixed point of An . Equip An with a vector
BLOWUPS AND RESOLUTION
19
space structure by identifying it with its tangent space Tp An . For a point a ∈ An
different from p, denote by g(a) the secant line in An through p and a, considered
as an element of projective space Pn−1 = P(Tp An ). The morphism
γ : An \ {p} → Pn−1 , a 7→ g(a),
e of the graph Γ of γ inside An × Pn−1 together
is well defined. The Zariski closure X
e
with the restriction π : X → X of the projection map An × Pn−1 → An is the point
blowup of An with center p.
Definition 4.9. (Blowup via closure of graph) Let X be an affine variety with
coordinate ring K[X] and let Z = V(I) be a subvariety of X defined by an ideal I
of K[X] generated by elements g1 , . . . , gk . The morphism
γ : X \ Z → Pk−1 , a 7→ (g1 (a) : · · · : gk (a)),
e of the graph Γ of γ inside X × Pk−1 together
is well defined. The Zariski closure X
e → X of the projection map X × Pk−1 → X is the blowup
with the restriction π : X
of X along Z. It does not depend, up to isomorphism over X, on the choice of the
generators gi of I.
Definition 4.10. (Blowup via equations) Let X be an affine variety with
coordinate ring K[X] and let Z = V(I) be a subvariety of X defined by an ideal
I of K[X] generated by elements g1 , . . . , gk . Assume that g1 , . . . , gk form a regular
sequence in K[X]. Let (u1 : . . . : uk ) be projective coordinates on Pk−1 . The
e of X × Pk−1 defined by the equations
subvariety X
ui · gj − uj · gi = 0,
i, j = 1, . . . , k,
e → X of the projection map X × Pk−1 → X is
together with the restriction π : X
the blowup of X along Z. It does not depend, up to isomorphism over X, on the
choice of the generators gi of I.
Remark 4.11. This is a special case of the preceding definition of blowup as
the closure of a graph. If g1 , . . . , gk do not form a regular sequence, the subvariety
e of X × Pk−1 may require more equations, see ex. 4.43.
X
Definition 4.12. (Blowup via affine charts) Let W = An be affine space over
K with chosen coordinates x1 , . . . , xn . Let Z ⊂ W be a coordinate subspace defined
by equations xj = 0 for j in some subset J ⊂ {1, . . . n}. Set Uj = An for j ∈ J,
and glue two affine charts Uj and U` via the transition maps
xi 7→ xi /xj ,
if i ∈ J \ {j, `},
xj 7→ 1/x` ,
x` 7→ xj x` ,
xi 7→ xi ,
if i 6∈ J.
f
f
This yields a variety W . Define a morphism π : W → W by the chart expressions
πj : An → An for j ∈ J as follows,
xi 7→ xi ,
if i 6∈ J \ {j},
xi 7→ xi xj ,
if i ∈ J \ {j}.
f
f → W is the blowup of W = An
The variety W together with the morphism π : W
n
n
along Z. The map πj : A → A is called the j-th affine chart of the blowup map,
20
HERWIG HAUSER
or the xj -chart. The maps πj depend on the choice of coordinates in An , whereas
f → W only depends on W and Z.
the blowup map π : W
Definition 4.13. (Blowup via ring extensions) Let I be a non-zero ideal in a
noetherian integral domain R, generated by non-zero elements g1 , . . . , gk of R. The
blowup of R in I is given by the ring extensions
g1
gk
R ,→ Rj = R
,...,
,
j = 1, . . . , k,
gj
gj
inside the rings Rgj = R[ g1j ], where the rings Rj are glued pairwise via the natural
inclusions Rgj , Rg` ⊂ Rgj g` , for j, ` = 1, . . . , k. The blowup does not depend, up to
isomorphism over X, on the choice of the generators gi of I.
Remark 4.14. The seven concepts of blowup given in the preceding definitions
are all essentially equivalent. It will be convenient to prove the equivalence in the
language of schemes, though the substance of the proofs is inherent to varieties.
Definition 4.15. (Local blowup via germs) Let π : X 0 → X be the blowup
of X along Z, and let a0 be a point of X 0 mapping to the point a ∈ X. The local
blowup of X along Z at a0 is the morphism of germs π : (X 0 , a0 ) → (X, a). It is given
by the dual homomorphism of local rings π ∗ : OX,a → OX 0 ,a0 . This terminology is
also used for the completions of the local rings giving rise to a morphism of formal
b 0 , a0 ) → (X,
b a) with dual homomorphism π ∗ : O
bX,a → O
bX 0 ,a0 .
neighborhoods π : (X
Definition 4.16. (Local blowup via localizations of rings) Let R = (R, m) be
e = L∞ I i . Any non-zero
a local ring and let I be an ideal of R with Rees algebra R
i=0
e also denoted by g.
element g of I defines a homogeneous element of degree 1 in R,
eg inherits from R
e the structure of a graded ring. The set of
The ring of quotients R
eg forms a ring, denoted by R[Ig −1 ], and consists of fractions
degree 0 elements of R
f /g ` with f ∈ I ` and ` ∈ N. The localization R[Ig −1 ]p of R[Ig −1 ] at any prime
ideal p of R[Ig −1 ] containing the maximal ideal m of R together with the natural
ring homomorphism α : R → R[Ig −1 ]p is called the local blowup of R with center I
associated to g and p.
Remark 4.17. The same definition can be made for non-local rings R, giving
rise to a local blowup Rq → Rq [Ig −1 ]p with respect to the localization Rq of R at
the prime ideal q = p ∩ R of R.
Theorem 4.18. Let X = Spec(R) be an affine scheme and Z a closed sube → X of X along Z when
scheme defined by an ideal I of R. The blowup π : X
e
e
defined as Proj(R) of the Rees algebra R of I satisfies the universal property of
blowups.
Proof. (a) It suffices to prove the universal property on the affine charts of
e since on overlaps the local patches will agree by their
an open covering of Proj(R),
uniqueness. This in turn reduces the proof to the local situation.
(b) Let β : R → S be a homomorphism of local rings such that β(I) · S is
a principal ideal of S generated by a non-zero divisor, for some ideal I of R. It
suffices to show that there is a unique homomorphism of local rings γ : R0 → S
such that R0 equals a localization R0 = R[Ig −1 ]p for some non-zero element g of I
and a prime ideal p of R[Ig −1 ] containing the maximal ideal of R, and such that
BLOWUPS AND RESOLUTION
21
the diagram
/ R0
}
}
}
β }}
} γ
~}}
S
commutes, where α : R → R0 denotes the local blowup of R with center I specified
by the choice of g and p. The proof of the local statement goes in two steps.
(c) There exists an element f ∈ I such that β(f ) generates
β(I) · S: Let h ∈ S
Pn
be a non-zero divisor generating β(I) · S. Write h = i=1 β(fi )si with elements
f1 , . . . ,P
fn ∈ I and
ti ∈ S. Thus,
s1 , . . . , sn ∈ S. Write β(fi ) = ti h with elements
Pn
n
h=
i=1 si ti h. Since h is a non-zero divisor, the sum
i=1 si ti equals 1. In
particular, there is an index i for which ti does not belong to the maximal ideal of
S. This implies that this ti is invertible in S, so that h = t−1
i β(fi ). In particular,
for this i, the element β(fi ) generates β(I) · S.
(d) Let f ∈ I be as in (c). By assumption, the image β(f ) is a non-zero
divisor in S. For every ` ≥ 0 and every h` ∈ I ` , there is an element a` ∈ S
such that β(h` ) = a` β(f )` . Since β(f ) P
is a non-zero divisor, a` is unique with
n
`
−1
this
property.
For
an
arbitrary
element
] with h` ∈ I ` set
`=0 h` /g of R[Ig
Pn
P
n
`
δ( `=0 h` /g ) = `=0 a` . This defines a ring homomorphism δ : R[Ig −1 ] → S that
restricts to β on R. By definition, δ is unique with this property. Let p ⊂ R[Ig −1 ] be
the inverse image under δ of the maximal ideal of S. This is a prime ideal of R[Ig −1 ]
which contains the maximal ideal of R. By the universal property of localization,
δ induces a homomorphism of local rings γ : R[Ig −1 ]p → S that restricts to β on
R, i.e., satisfies γ ◦ α = β. By construction, γ is unique.
R
α
Theorem 4.19. Let X = Spec(R) be an affine scheme and let Z be a closed
e
subscheme defined by an ideal I of R. The blowup of X along Z defined by Proj(R)
can be covered by affine charts as described in def. 4.10.
Proof. For g ∈ I denote by R[Ig −1 ] ⊂ Rg the subring of the ring of quotients Rg generated by homogeneous elements of degree 0 of the form h/g ` with
eg .
h ∈ I ` and ` ∈ N. This gives an injective ring homomorphism R[Ig −1 ] → R
e
Let now g1 , . . . , gk be generators of I. Then X = Proj(R) is covered by the principal open sets Spec(R[Igi−1 ]) = Spec(R[g1 /gi , . . . , gk /gi ]). The chart expression
e → X follows now
Spec(R[g1 /gi , . . . , gk /gi ]) → Spec(R) of the blowup map π : X
by computation.
Theorem 4.20. Let X be an affine variety with coordinate ring R = K[X] and
let Z be a closed subvariety defined by the ideal I of R with generators g1 , . . . , gk .
e of the Rees algebra R
e of R equals the
The blowup of X along Z defined by Proj(R)
k−1
closure of the graph Γ of γ : X \ Z → P
, a 7→ (g1 (a) : · · · : gk (a)). If g1 , . . . , gk
form a regular sequence, the closure is defined as a subvariety of X × Pk−1 by
equations as indicated in def. 4.10.
Proof. (a) Let Uj ⊂ Pk−1 be the affine chart given by uj 6= 0, with isomorphism Uj ' Ak−1 , (u1 : . . . : uk ) 7→ (u1 /uj , . . . , uk /uj ). The j-th chart expression of γ equals a 7→ (g1 (a)/gj (a), . . . , gk (a)/gj (a)) and is defined on the principal
open set gj 6= 0 of X. The closure of the graph of γ in Uj is therefore given
by Spec(R[g1 /gi , . . . , gk /gi ]). The preceding theorem then establishes the required
equality.
22
HERWIG HAUSER
(b) If g1 , . . . , gk form a regular sequence, their only linear relations over R are
the trivial ones, so that
R[Igi−1 ] = R[g1 /gi , . . . gk /gi ] ' R[t1 , . . . , tk ]/(gi tj − gj , j = 1, . . . , k).
e → X is then given by the ring inclusion R →
The i-th chart expression of π : X
R[t1 , . . . , tk ]/(gi tj − gj , j = 1, . . . , k).
Examples
Example 4.21. For the cone X in A3 of equation x2 + y 2 = z 2 , the line Y in
A defined by x = y − z = 0 is a hypersurface of X at each point. It is a Cartier
divisor at any point a ∈ Y \ {0} but it is not a Cartier divisor at 0. The double
line Y 0 in A3 defined by x2 = y − z = 0 is a Cartier divisor of X since it can be
defined in X by y − z = 0. The subvariety Y 00 in A3 consisting of the two lines
defined by x = y 2 − z 2 = 0 is a Cartier divisor of X since it can be defined in X by
x = 0.
3
Example 4.22. For the surface X : x2 y−z 2 = 0 in A3 , the subvariety Y defined
by y 2 − xz = x3 − yz = 0 is the singular curve parametrized by t 7→ (t3 , t4 , t5 ).
It is everywhere a Cartier divisor except at 0: there, the local ring of Y in X
is K[x, y, z](x,y,z) /(x2 y − z 2 , y 2 − xz, x3 − yz), which defines a singular cubic. It
is of codimension 1 in X but not a complete intersection (i.e., cannot be defined
in A3 , as the codimension would suggest, by two but only by three equations).
Thus it is not a Cartier divisor. At any other point a = (t3 , t4 , t5 ), t 6= 0 of Y ,
one has OY,a = S/(x2 y − z 2 , y 2 /x − z, x3 − yz) = S/(x2 y − z 2 , y 2 /x − z) with
S = K[x, y, z](x−t3 ,y−t4 ,z−t5 ) the localization of K[x, y, z] at a. Hence Y is a Cartier
divisor there.
Example 4.23. Let Z be one of the axes of the cross X : xy = 0 in A2 , e.g.
the x-axis. At any point a on the y-axis except the origin, Z is Cartier: one has
OX,a = K[x, y](x,y−a) /(xy) = K[x, y](x,y−a) /(x) and the element h = y defining Z is
a unit in this local ring. At the origin 0 of A2 the local ring of X is K[x, y](x,y) /(xy)
and Z is locally defined by h = y which is a zero-divisor in OX,0 . Thus Z is not
Cartier in X at 0.
Example 4.24. Let Z be the origin of X = A2 . Then Z is not a hypersurface
and hence not Cartier in X.
Example 4.25. . The (reduced) origin Z = {0} in X = V (xy, x2 ) ⊂ A2 is not
a Cartier divisor in X.
Example 4.26. . Are Z = V (x2 ) in A1 and Z = V (x2 y) in X = A2 Cartier
divisors?
Example 4.27. . Let Z = V (x2 , y) be the origin of A2 with non-reduced structure given by the ideal (x2 , y). Then Z is not a Cartier divisor in X = V (xy, x2 ) ⊂
A2 .
Example 4.28. Let X = A1 be the affine line with coordinate ring R = K[x]
e = K[x, xt] ⊂ K[x, t] with respect
and let Z be the origin of A1 . The Rees algebra R
to the ideal defining Z is isomorphic, as a graded ring, to a polynomial ring K[u, v]
e of
in two variables with deg u = 0 and deg v = 1. Therefore, the point blowup X
1
0
1
e
X is isomorphic to A × P = A , and π : X → X is the identity.
BLOWUPS AND RESOLUTION
23
More generally, let X = An be n-dimensional affine space with coordinate ring
R = K[x1 , . . . , xn ] and let Z ⊂ X be a hypersurface defined by some non-zero
e = K[x1 , . . . , xn , gt] ⊂ K[x1 , . . . , xn , t] with
g ∈ K[x1 , . . . , xn ]. The Rees algebra R
respect the ideal defining Z is isomorphic, as a graded ring, to a polynomial ring
K[u1 , . . . , un , v] in n + 1 variables with deg ui = 0 and deg v = 1. Therefore the
e of X along Z is isomorphic to An × P0 = An , and π : X
e → X is the
blowup X
identity.
Example 4.29. Let X = Spec(R) be an affine scheme and Z ⊂ X be defined
e = R[gt] ⊂ R[t] with respect
by some non-zero-divisor g ⊂ R. The Rees algebra R
to the ideal defining Z is isomorphic, as a graded ring, to R[v] with deg r = 0 for
e of X along Z is isomorphic to
r ∈ R and deg v = 1. Therefore the blowup X
0
e
X × P = X, and π : X → X is the identity.
Example 4.30. Take X = V (xy) ⊂ A2 with coordinate ring R = K[x, y]/(xy).
Let Z be defined in X by y = 0. The Rees algebra of R with respect to the ideal
e = R[yt] ∼
defining Z equals R
= K[x, y, u]/(xy, xu) with deg x = deg y = 0 and
deg u = 1.
Example 4.31. Let X = Spec(R) be an affine scheme and let Z ⊂ X be
defined by some zero-divisor g 6= 0 in R, say h · g = 0 for some non-zero h ∈ R. The
e = R[gt] ⊂ R[t] with respect to the ideal defining Z is isomorphic,
Rees algebra R
as a graded ring, to R[v]/(h · v) with deg r = 0 for r ∈ R and deg v = 1. Therefore,
e of X along Z equals the closed subvariety of X × P0 = X defined by
the blowup X
e → X is the inclusion map.
h · v = 0, and π : X
Example 4.32. Take in the situation of the preceding example X = V (xy) ⊂
e = R[yt] ' K[x, y, u]/(xy, xu)
A2 and g = y, h = x. Then R = K[x, y]/(xy) and R
with deg x = deg y = 0 and deg u = 1.
Example 4.33. Let X = Spec(R) be an affine scheme and let Z ⊂ X be
defined by some nilpotent element g 6= 0 in R, say g k = 0 for some k ≥ 1. The
e = R[gt] ⊂ R[t] with respect to the ideal defining Z is isomorphic,
Rees algebra R
as a graded ring, to R[v]/(v k ) with deg r = 0 for r ∈ R and deg v = 1. The blowup
e of X is the closed subvariety of X × P0 = X defined by v k = 0.
X
Example 4.34. Let X = A2 and let Z be defined in X by I = (x, y). The
e = K[x, y, xt, yt] ⊂ K[x, y, t] of R = K[x, y] with respect to the ideal
Rees algebra R
defining Z is isomorphic, as a graded ring, to the factor ring K[x, y, u, v]/(xv − yu),
e of X
with deg x = deg y = 0 and deg v = deg u = 1. It follows that the blowup X
2
1
along Z embeds naturally as the closed and regular subvariety of A × P defined
e → X being given by the restriction to X
e of
by xv − yu = 0, the morphism π : X
2
1
2
the first projection A × P → A .
Example 4.35. Let X = A2 and let Z be defined in X by I = (x, y 2 ). The
e = K[x, y, xt, y 2 t] ⊂ K[x, y, t] of R = K[x, y] with respect to the ideal
Rees algebra R
defining Z is isomorphic, as a graded ring, to the factor ring K[x, y, u, v]/(xv −y 2 u),
e of X
with deg x = deg y = 0 and deg u = deg v = 1. It follows that the blowup X
2
1
along Z embeds naturally as the closed and singular subvariety of A × P defined
e → X being given by the restriction to X
e of
by xv − y 2 u = 0, the morphism π : X
2
1
2
the first projection A × P → A .
24
HERWIG HAUSER
Example 4.36. Let X = A3 and let Z be defined in X by I = (xy, z). The
e = K[x, y, z, xyt, zt] ⊂ K[x, y, z, t] of R = K[x, y, z] with respect to
Rees algebra R
the ideal defining Z is isomorphic, as a graded ring, to K[u, v, w, r, s]/(uvs − wr),
with deg u = deg v = deg w = 0 and deg r = deg s = 1. It follows that the blowup
e of X along Z embeds naturally as the closed and singular subvariety of A3 × P1
X
e → X being given by the restriction
defined by uvs − wr = 0, the morphism π : X
3
1
3
e
to X of the first projection A × P → A .
Example 4.37. Let X = A1Z be the affine line over the integers and let Z be
e = Z[x, xt, pt] ⊂
defined in X by I = (x, p) for a prime p ∈ Z. The Rees algebra R
Z[x, t] of R = Z[x] with respect to the ideal defining Z is isomorphic, as a graded
ring, to Z[u, v, w]/(xw − pv), with deg u = 0 and deg v = deg w = 1. It follows that
e of X along Z embeds naturally as the closed and regular subvariety
the blowup X
1
1
e → X being given by the
of AZ × PZ defined by xw − pv, the morphism π : X
e of the first projection A1 × P1 → A1 .
restriction to X
Z
Z
Z
Example 4.38. . Let X = A2Z20 be the affine plane over the ring Z20 = Z/20Z,
e = Z20 [x, y, xt, 2yt] ⊂
and let Z be defined in X by I = (x, 2y). The Rees algebra R
Z20 [x, y, t] of R = Z20 [x] with respect to I is isomorphic, as a graded ring, to
Z20 [u, v, w, z]/(xz − 2vw), with deg u = deg v = 0 and deg w = deg z = 1.
Example 4.39. Let R = Z6 with Z6 = Z/6Z, and let Z be defined in X by
e = Z6 [2t] ⊂ Z6 [t] of R with respect to I is isomorphic,
I = (2). The Rees algebra R
as a graded ring, to Z6 ⊕ u · Z3 [u] with deg u = 1.
Example 4.40. Let R = K[[x, y]] be a formal power series ring in two variables
x and y, and let Z be defined in X by I be the ideal generated by ex − 1 and
e of R with respect to I equals R[(ex − 1)t, ln(y +
ln(y + 1). The Rees algebra R
x
1)t] = K[[x, y]][(e − 1)t, ln(y + 1)t] ∼
= K[[x, y]][u, v]/(ln(y + 1)u − (ex − 1)v) with
deg u = deg v = 1.
e ⊂ X × Pn−1 of X at the
Example 4.41. Let X = An . The point blowup X
origin is defined by the ideal (ui xj −uj xi , i, j = 1, . . . , n) in K[x1 , . . . , xn , u1 , . . . , un ].
This is a graded ring, where deg xi = 0 and deg ui = 1 for all i = 1, . . . , n. The ring
K[x1 , . . . , xn , u1 , . . . , un ]/(ui xj − uj xi , i, j = 1, . . . , n)
e = K[x1 , . . . , xn , x1 t, . . . , xn t] ⊂ K[x1 , . . . , xn , t]
is isomorphic, as a graded ring, to R
e is the Rees-algebra of the ideal (x1 , . . . , xn )
with deg xi = 0, deg t = 1. The ring R
L
d
e
of K[x1 , . . . , xn ]. Thus X is isomorphic to Proj
d≥0 (x1 , . . . , xn ) .
e n of
Example 4.42. Let 1 ≤ k ≤ n. The i-th affine chart of the blowup A
n
A in the ideal I = (x1 , . . . , xk ) is isomorphic to A , for i = 1, . . . , k, via the ring
isomorphism
K[x1 , . . . , xn ] ' K[x1 , . . . , xn , t1 , . . . , b
ti , . . . tk ]/(xi tj − xj , j = 1, . . . , k, j 6= i),
n
where xj 7→ tj for j = 1, . . . , k, j 6= i, respectively xj 7→ xj for j = k + 1, . . . , n and
j = i. The inverse map is given by xj 7→ xi xj for j = 1, . . . , k, j 6= i, respectively
xj 7→ xj for j = k + 1, . . . , n and j = i, respectively tj 7→ xj for j = 1, . . . , k, j 6= i.
Example 4.43. Let X = A2 be the affine plane and let g1 = x2 , g2 = xy, g3 =
y generate the ideal I ⊂ K[x, y]. The gi do not form a regular sequence. The
3
BLOWUPS AND RESOLUTION
25
subvariety of A2 × P2 defined by the equations gi uj − gj ui = 0 is singular, but the
blowup of A2 in I is regular.
Example 4.44. Compute the following blowups:
(a) A2 in the center (x, y)(x, y 2 ),
(b) A3 in the centers (x, yz) and (x, yz)(x, y)(x, z),
(c) A3 in the center (x2 + y 2 − 1, z).
(d) The plane curve x2 = y in the origin.
Use affine charts and ring extensions to determine at which points the resulting
varieties are regular or singular.
Example 4.45. Blow up A3 in 0 and compute the inverse image of x2 +y 2 = z 2 .
Example 4.46. . Blow up A2 in the point (0, 1). What is the inverse image of
the lines x + y = 0 and x + y = 1?
Example 4.47. . Compute the two chart transition maps for the blowup of A3
along the z-axis.
Example 4.48. . Blow up the cone X defined by x2 + y 2 = z 2 in one of its
lines.
Example 4.49. . Blow up A3 in the circle x2 + (y + 2)2 − 1 = z = 0 and in the
elliptic curve y 2 − x3 − x = z = 0.
Example 4.50. Interpret the blowup of A2 in the ideal (x, y 2 )(x, y) as a composition of blowups in regular centers.
Example 4.51. Show that the blowup of An along a coordinate subspace Z
equals the cartesian product of the point-blowup in a transversal subspace V of An
of complementary dimension (with respect to Z) with the identity map on Z.
Example 4.52. . Show that the ideals (x1 , . . . , xn ) and (x1 , . . . , xn )m define
the same blowup of An when taken as center.
Example 4.53. Let E be a normal crossings subvariety of An and let Z be a
subvariety of An such that E ∪ Z also has normal crossings (the union being defined
by the product of ideals). Show that the inverse image of E under the blowup of
An along Z has again normal crossings. Show by an example that the assumption
on Z cannot be dropped in general.
Example 4.54. Draw a real picture of the blowup of A2 at the origin.
e n of An with center a point is nonExample 4.55. Show that the blowup A
singular.
Example 4.56. Describe the geometric construction via secants of the blowup
e 3 of A3 with center 0. What is π −1 (0)? For a chosen affine chart W 0 of A
e 3,
A
0
consider all cylinders Y over a circle in W centered at the origin and parallel to a
coordinate axis. What is the image of Y under π in A3 ?
Example 4.57. . Compute the blowup of the Whitney umbrella X = V (x2 −
y z) ⊂ A3 with center one of the three coordinate axes, respectively the origin 0.
2
Example 4.58. Determine the locus of points of the Whitney umbrella X =
V (x2 −y 2 z) where the singularities are normal crossings, respectively simple normal
crossings. Blow up the complements of these loci and compare with the preceding
example [Kol07] ex. 3.6.1, p. 123, [BDMVP12] Thm. 3.4.
26
HERWIG HAUSER
Example 4.59. Let Z be a regular center in An , with induced blowup π :
e n mapping to a point a ∈ Z. Show that it is
A → An , and let a0 be a point of A
possible to choose local formal coordinates at a, i.e., a regular parameter system of
bAn ,a , so that the center is a coordinate subspace, and so that a0 is the origin of
O
e n . Is this also possible with a regular parameter system
one of the affine charts of A
of the local ring OAn ,a ?
en
Example 4.60. Let X = V (f ) be a hypersurface in An , defined by f ∈
K[x1 , . . . , xn ], and let Z be a regular closed subvariety which is contained in the
e n → An be
locus S of points of X where f attains its maximal order. Let π : A
the blowup along Z and let X s = V (f s ) be the strict transform of X, defined
e n . Show that for points a ∈ Z and
as the Zariski closure of π −1 (X \ Z) in A
0
−1
0
a ∈ E = π (Z) with π(a ) = a the inequality orda0 f 0 ≤ orda f holds. Do the
same for subvarieties of An defined by arbitrary ideals.
Example 4.61. Find an example of a variety X for which the dimension of
the singular locus increases under the blowup of a closed regular center Z that is
contained in the top locus of X [Hau98] ex. 9.
e n , a0 ) → (An , a) be the local blowup of An with
Example 4.62. Let π : (A
center the point a, considered at a point a0 ∈ E. Let x1 , . . . , xn be given local
coordinates at a. Determine the coordinate changes in (An , a) which make the
chart expressions of π monomial (i.e., each component of a chart expression is a
monomial in the coordinates).
Example 4.63. Let x1 , . . . , xn be local coordinates at a so that the local blowup
e n , a0 ) → (An , a) is monomial with respect to them. Determine the formal
π : (A
e n , a0 ) which commute with the local blowup.
automorphisms of (A
Example 4.64. . Compute the blowup of X = Spec(Z[x]) in the ideals (x, p)
and (px, pq) where p and q are primes.
Example 4.65. Let R = K[x, y, z] be the polynomial ring in three variables
and let I be the ideal (x, yz) of R. The blowup of R along I corresponds to the
ring extensions:
h yz i
∼
R ,→ R
= K[s, t, u, v]/(sv − tu),
x
x ∼
R ,→ R
= K[s, t, u, v]/(s − tuv).
yz
The first ring extension defines a singular variety while the second one defines a
non-singular one. Let W = A3 and Z = V (I) ⊂ W be the affine space and the
subvariety defined by I. The blowup of R along I coincides with the blowup W 0 of
W along Z.
(a) Compute the chart expressions of the blowup maps.
(b) Determine the exceptional divisor.
(c) Apply one more blowup to W 0 to get a non-singular variety W 00 .
(d) Express the composition of the two blowups as a single blowup in a properly
chosen ideal.
(e) Blow up A3 along the three coordinate axes. Show that the resulting variety
is non-singular.
(f) Show the same for the blowup of An along the n coordinate axes.
BLOWUPS AND RESOLUTION
27
Example 4.66. The zeroset in A3 of the non-reduced ideal (x, yz)(x, y)(x, z) =
(x , x2 y, x2 z, xyz, y 2 z) is the union of the y- and the z-axis. Taken as center, the
resulting blowup of A3 equals the composition of two blowups: The first blowup has
center the ideal (x, yz) in A3 , giving a three-fold W1 in a regular four-dimensional
ambient variety with one singular point of local equation xy = zw. The second
blowup is the point blowup of W1 with center this singular point [Hau00] Prop. 3.5,
[FW11, Lev01].
3
e n of An in a monomial ideal I of
Example 4.67. + Consider the blowup A
e n may be singular. What types of singularities will
K[x, . . . , xn ]. Show that A
I so that the blowup of An in I is
occur? Find a natural saturation procedure I
e n [FW11].
regular and equal to a (natural) resolution of the singularities of A
Example 4.68. The Nash modification of a subvariety X of An is the closure
of the graph of the map which associates to each non-singular point its tangent
space, taken as an element of the Grassmanian of d-dimensional linear subspaces
of Kn , where d = dim(X). For a hypersurface X defined in An by f = 0, the Nash
modification coincides with the blowup of X in the Jacobian ideal of f generated
by the partial derivatives of f .
5. Lecture V: Properties of Blowup
e → X be the blowup of X along a subvariety Z,
Proposition 5.1. Let π : X
e ×X Y → Y
and let ϕ : Y → X be a morphism, the base change. Denote by p : X
the projection from the fibre product to the second factor. Let S = ϕ−1 (Z) ⊂ Y
be the inverse image of Z under ϕ, and let Ye be the Zariski closure of p−1 (Y \ S)
e ×X Y . The restriction τ : Ye → Y of p to Ye equals the blowup of Y along S.
in X
e
e ×X Y q
/ Ye
/X
/X
F A
HH
AA
H
HHτ
AA
HH
p
π
AA
HH
A
H
#
ϕ
/Y
/X
S
Proof. The assertion is best proven via the universal property of blowups.
To show that F = τ −1 (S) is a Cartier divisor in Ye , consider the projection q :
e ×X Y → X
e onto the first factor. By the commutativity of the diagram,
X
F = p−1 (S) = p−1 ◦ ϕ−1 (Z) = q −1 ◦ π −1 (Z) = q −1 (E).
e and q is a projection, F is locally defined by a
As E is a Cartier divisor in X
principal ideal. The associated primes of Ye are the associated primes of Y not
e cannot pull
containing the ideal of S. Thus, the local defining equation of E in X
e
back to a zero divisor on Y . This proves that F is a Cartier divisor.
To show that τ : Ye → Y fulfills the universal property, let ψ : Y 0 → Y be a
morphism such that ψ −1 (S) is a Cartier divisor in Y 0 . This results in the following
diagram.
28
HERWIG HAUSER
/X
e
w; >>>
w
>>π
q ww
w
>>
ww
w
>
w
σ
0
e
/
Y
X ×X GY
X
?
GG
GGp
ϕ
GG
GG
ψ
G#
/Y
−1
−1
−1
−1
Since ψ (S) = ψ (ϕ (Z)) = (ϕ ◦ ψ) (Z), there exists by the universal
e → X a unique map ρ : Y 0 → X
e such that ϕ ◦ ψ =
property of the blowup π : X
π ◦ ρ. By the universal property of fibre products, there exists a unique map
e ×X Y such that q ◦ σ = ρ and p ◦ σ = ψ.
σ :Y0 →X
e ×X Y . Since ψ −1 (S) is a Cartier
It remains to show that σ(Y 0 ) lies in Ye ⊂ X
0
0
−1
divisor in Y , its complement Y \ ψ (S) is dense in Y 0 . From
ρ
Y 0 \ ψ −1 (S) = ψ −1 (Y \ S) = (p ◦ σ)−1 (Y \ S) = σ −1 (p−1 (Y \ S))
follows that σ(Y 0 \ ψ −1 (S)) ⊂ p−1 (Y \ S). But Ye is the closure of p−1 (Y \ S) in
e ×X Y , so that σ(Y 0 ) ⊂ Ye as required.
X
Corollary 5.2. (a) Let π : X 0 → X be the blowup of X along a subvariety Z,
and let Y be a closed subvariety of X. Denote by Y 0 the Zariski closure of π −1 (Y \Z)
in X 0 , i.e., the strict transform of Y under π, cf. def. 6.2. The restriction τ : Y 0 → Y
of π to Y 0 is the blowup of Y along Y ∩ Z. In particular, if Z ⊂ Y , then τ is the
blowup Ye of Y along Z.
(b) Let U ⊂ X be an open subvariety, and let Z ⊂ X be a closed subvariety,
so that U ∩ Z is closed in U . Let π : X 0 → X be the blowup of X along Z. The
blowup of U along U ∩ Z equals the restriction of π to U 0 = π −1 (U ).
b a) for
(c) Let a ∈ X be a point. Write (X, a) for the germ of X at a, and (X,
the formal neighbourhood. There are natural maps
b a) → X
(X, a) → X
and (X,
corresponding to the localization and completion homomorphisms OX → OX,a →
bX,a . Take a point a0 above a in the blowup X 0 of X along a subvariety Z containing
O
a. This gives local blowups of germs and formal neighborhoods
b 0 , a0 ) → (X,
b a).
πa0 : (X 0 , a0 ) → (X, a),
π
ba0 : (X
The blowup of a local ring is not local in general; to get a local blowup one needs
to localize also on X 0 .
(d) If X1 → X is an isomorphism between varieties sending a subvariety Z1 to
Z, the blowup X10 of X1 along Z1 is canonically isomorphic to the blowup X 0 of X
along Z. This also holds for local isomorphisms.
(e) If X = Z × Y is a cartesian product of two varieties, and a is a given point
of Y , the blowup π : X 0 → X of X along Z × {a} is isomorphic to the cartesian
product IdZ × τ : Z × Y 0 → Z × Y of the identity on Z with the blowup τ : Y 0 → Y
of Y in a.
Proposition 5.3. Let π : X 0 → X be the blowup of X along a regular subvariety Z with exceptional divisor E. Let Y be a subvariety of X, and Y ∗ = π −1 (Y )
its preimage under π. Let Y 0 be the Zariski closure of π −1 (Y \ Z) in X 0 . If Y is
transversal to Z, i.e., Y ∪ Z has normal crossings at all points of the intersection
BLOWUPS AND RESOLUTION
29
Y ∩ Z, also Y ∗ has normal crossings at all points of Y ∗ ∩ E. In particular, if Y is
regular and transversal to Z, also Y 0 is regular and transversal to E.
Proof. Having normal crossings is defined locally at each point through the
completions of local rings. The assertion is proven by a computation in local coordinates for which the blowup is monomial, cf. Prop. 5.4 below.
Proposition 5.4. Let W be a regular variety of dimension n with a regular
subvariety Z of codimension k. Let π : W 0 → W denote the blowup of W along Z,
with exceptional divisor E. Let V be a regular hypersurface in W containing Z,
let D be a (not necessarily reduced) normal crossings divisor in W having normal
crossings with V . Let a be a point of V ∩ Z and let a0 ∈ E be a point lying above
a. There exist local coordinates x1 , . . . , xn of W at a such that
(1) a has components a = (0, . . . , 0).
(2) V is defined in W by xn−k+1 = 0.
(3) Z is defined in W by xn−k+1 = . . . = xn = 0.
(4) D ∩ V is defined in V locally at a by a monomial xq11 · · · xqnn , for some
q = (q1 , . . . , qn ) ∈ Nn with qn−k+1 = 0.
(5) The point a0 lies in the xn -chart of W 0 . The chart expression of π in the
xn -chart is of the form
xi 7→ xi
for i ≤ n − k and i = n,
xi 7→ xi xn
for n − k + 1 ≤ i ≤ n − 1.
(6) In the induced coordinates of the xn -chart, the point a0 has components
a0 = (0, . . . , 0, a0n−k+2 , . . . , a0n−k+d , 0, . . . , 0) with non-zero entries a0j ∈ K for n −
k + 2 ≤ j ≤ n − k + d, where d is the number of components of D whose strict
transforms do not pass through a0 .
(7) The strict transform (def. 6.2) V s of V in W 0 is given in the induced
coordinates locally at a0 by xn−k+1 = 0.
(8) The local coordinate change ϕ in W at a given by ϕ(xi ) = xi + a0i · xn makes
the local blowup π : (W 0 , a0 ) → (W, a) monomial. It preserves the defining ideals
of Z and V in W .
(9) If condition (4) is not imposed, the coordinates x1 , . . . , xn at a can be chosen
with (1) to (3) and so that a0 is the origin of the xn -chart.
Proof. [Hau10b].
0
Theorem 5.5. Any projective birational morphism π : X → X is a blowup of
X in an ideal I.
Proof. [Har77], chap. II, Thm. 7.17.
Examples
Example 5.6. Let X be a regular subvariety of An and Z a regular closed
subvariety which is transversal to X. Show that the blowup X 0 of X along Z is
again a regular variety (this is a special case of Prop. 5.3).
Example 5.7. + Prove that plain varieties remain plain under blowup in regular
centers [BHSV08] Thm. 4.3.
Example 5.8. + Is any rational and regular variety plain?
30
HERWIG HAUSER
Example 5.9. Consider the blowup π : W 0 → W of a regular variety W along a
closed subvariety Z. Show that, for any chosen definition of blowup, the exceptional
divisor E = π −1 (Z) is a hypersurface in W 0 .
Example 5.10. The composition of two blowups W 00 → W 0 and W 0 → W is a
blowup of W in a suitable center [Bod03].
Example 5.11. A fractional ideal I over an integral domain R is an R-submodule of Quot(R) such that rI ⊂ R for some non-zero element r ∈ R. Blowups can
be defined via Proj also for centers which are fractional ideals [Gro61]. Let I and
J be two (ordinary) non-zero ideals of R. The blowup of R along I is isomorphic
to the blowup of R along J if and only if there exist positive integers k, ` and
fractional ideals K, L over R such that JK = I k and IL = J ` [Moo01] Cor. 2.
Example 5.12. . Determine the equations in X × P2 of the blowup of X = A3
along the image Z of the monomial curve (t3 , t4 , t5 ) of equations g1 = y 2 − xz,
g2 = yz − x3 , g3 = z 2 − x2 y.
Example 5.13. . The blowup of the cone X = V (x2 − yz) in A3 along the zaxis Z = V (x, y) is an isomorphism locally at all points outside 0, but not globally
on X.
Example 5.14. . Blow up the non-reduced point X = V (x2 ) in A2 in the
(reduced) origin Z = 0.
Example 5.15. . Blow up the subscheme X = V (x2 , xy) of A2 in the reduced
origin.
Example 5.16. Blow up the subvariety X = V (xz, yz) of A3 first in the origin,
then in the x-axis, and determine the points where the resulting morphisms are local
isomorphisms.
Example 5.17. . The blowups of A3 along the union of the x- with the y-axis,
respectively along the cusp, with ideals (xy, z) and (x3 − y 2 , z), are singular.
6. Lecture VI: Transforms of Ideals and Varieties under Blowup
Throughout this section, π : W 0 → W denotes the blowup of a variety W along a
closed subvariety Z, with exceptional divisor E = π −1 (Z) defined by the principal
ideal IE of OW 0 . Let π ∗ : OW → OW 0 be the dual homomorphism of π. Let X ⊂ W
be a closed subvariety, and let I be an ideal on W . Several of the subsequent definitions and results can be extended to the case of arbitrary birational morphisms,
taking for Z the complement of the open subset of W where the inverse map of π
is defined.
Definition 6.1. The inverse image X ∗ = π −1 (X) of X and the extension
I = π ∗ (I) = I · OW 0 of I are called the total transform of X and I under π.
For f ∈ OW , denote by f ∗ its image π ∗ (f ) in OW 0 . The ideal I ∗ is generated by
all transforms f ∗ for f varying in I. If I is the ideal defining X in W , the ideal
I ∗ defines X ∗ in W 0 . In particular, the total transform of the center Z equals
the exceptional divisor E, and W ∗ = W 0 . In the category of schemes, the total
transform will in general be non-reduced when considered as a subscheme of W 0 .
∗
BLOWUPS AND RESOLUTION
31
Definition 6.2. The Zariski closure of π −1 (X \ Z) in W 0 is called the strict
transform of X under π and denoted by X s , also known as the proper or birational
transform. The strict transform is a closed subvariety of the total transform X ∗ .
The difference X ∗ \ X s is contained in the exceptional locus E. If Z ⊂ X is
e of X
contained in X, the strict transform X s of X in W 0 equals the blowup X
along Z, cf. Prop. 5.1 and its corollary. If the center Z coincides with X, the strict
transform X s is empty.
Let IU denote the restriction of an ideal I to the open set U = W \ Z. Set
U 0 = π −1 (U ) ⊂ W 0 and let τ : U 0 → U be the restriction of π to U 0 . The strict
transform I s of the ideal I is defined as τ ∗ (IU ) ∩ OW 0 . If the ideal I defines X in
W , the ideal I s defines X s in W 0 . It equals the union of colon ideals
[
i
Is =
(I ∗ : IE
).
i≥0
Let h be an element of O
at a0 ,
W 0 ,a0
defining E locally in W 0 at a point a0 . Then, locally
I s = (f s , f ∈ I),
where the strict transform f of f is defined at a0 and up to multiplication by
invertible elements in OW 0 ,a0 through f ∗ = hk · f s with maximal exponent k. The
value of k is the order of f ∗ along E, cf. def. 8.4. By abuse of notation this is
written as f s = h−k · f ∗ = h−ordZ f · f ∗ .
s
Lemma 6.3. Let f : R → S be a ring homomorphism, I an ideal of R and s an
element of R, with induced ring homomorphism fs : Rs → Sf (s) . Let I e = f (I) · S
and (I · Rs )e = fs (I · Rs ) · Sf (s) denote the respective extensions of ideals. Then
S
e
i
e
i≥0 (I : f (s) ) = (I · Rs ) ∩ S.
S
Proof. Let u ∈ S. Then u ∈ i≥0 (I e : f (s)i ) if and only if uf (s)i ∈ I e for
P
some i ≥ 0, say uf (s)i = j aj f (xj ) for elements xj ∈ I and aj ∈ S. Rewrite this
P
x
as u = j aj f ( sij ). This just means that u ∈ (I · Rs )e .
Remark 6.4. If I is generated locally by elements f1 , . . . , fk of OW , then I s
contains the ideal generated by the strict transforms f1s , . . . , fks of f1 , . . . , fk , but
the inclusion can be strict, see the examples below.
Definition 6.5. Let K[x] = K[x1 , . . . , xn ] be the polynomial ring over K,
considered with the natural grading given by the degree. Denote by in(g) the
homogeneous form of lowest degree of a non-zero polynomial g of K[x], called the
initial form of g. Set in(0) = 0. For a non-zero ideal I, denote by in(I) the ideal
generated by all initial forms in(g) of elements g of I, called the initial ideal of I.
Elements g1 , . . . , gk of an ideal I of K[x] are a Macaulay basis of I if their initial
forms in(g1 ), . . . , in(gk ) generate in(I). In [Hir64] III.1, def. 3, p. 208, such a basis
was called a standard basis, which is now used for a slightly more specific concept,
see Rem. 6.7 below. By noetherianity of K[x], any ideal possesses a Macaulay basis.
Proposition 6.6. (Hironaka) The strict transform of an ideal under blowup in
a regular center is generated by the strict transforms of the elements of a Macaulay
basis of the ideal.
Proof. ([Hir64], III.2, Lemma 6, p. 216, and III.6, Thm. 5, p. 238) If I ⊂ J are
two ideals of K[[x]] such that in(I) = in(J) then they are equal, I = J. This holds at
32
HERWIG HAUSER
least for degree compatible monomial orders, due to the Grauert-Hironaka-Galligo
division theorem. Therefore it has to be shown that in(g1s ), . . . , in(gks ) generate
in(I s ). But in(I s ) = (in(I))s , and the assertion follows.
Remark 6.7. The strict transform of a Macaulay basis at a point a0 of W 0 need
no longer be a Macaulay basis. This is however the case if the Macaulay basis is
reduced and the sequence of its orders has remained constant at a0 , cf. [Hir64] III.8,
Lemma 20, p. 254. More generally, taking on K[x] instead of the grading by degree
a grading so that all homogeneous pieces are one-dimensional and generated by
monomials (i.e., a grading induced by a monomial order on Nn ), the initial form of
a polynomial and the initial ideal are both monomial. In this case Macaulay bases
are called standard bases. A standard basis g1 , . . . , gk is reduced if no monomial of
the tails gi − in(gi ) belongs to in(I). If the monomial order is degree compatible,
i.e., the induced grading a refinement of the natural grading of K[x] by degree,
the strict transforms of the elements of a standard basis of I generate the strict
transform of the ideal.
Definition 6.8. Let I be an ideal on W and let c ≥ 0 be a natural number
less than or equal to the order d of I along the center Z, cf. def. 8.4. Then I ∗ has
c
order ≥ c along E. There exists a unique ideal I ! of OW 0 such that I ∗ = IE
· I !,
called the controlled transform of I with respect to the control c. It is not defined
for values of c > d. In case that c = d attains the maximal value, I ! is denoted by
−ordZ I
−d
I g and called the weak transform of I. It is written as I g = IE
· I ∗ = IE
· I ∗.
Remark 6.9. The inclusions I ∗ ⊂ I g ⊂ I ! ⊂ I s are obvious. The components
of V (I g ) which are not contained in V (I s ) lie entirely in the exceptional divisor
E, but can be strictly contained. For principal ideals, I g and I s coincide. When
∗
of the total
the transforms are defined scheme-theoretically, the reduction Xred
∗
transform X of X consists of the union of E with the strict transform X s .
Definition 6.10. A local flag F on W at a is a chain F0 = {a} ⊂ F1 ⊂ . . . ⊂
Fn = W of regular closed subvarieties, respectively subschemes, Fi of dimension i
of an open neighbourhood U of a in W . Local coordinates x1 , . . . , xn on W at a
are called subordinate to the flag F if Fi = V (xi+1 , . . . , xn ) locally at a. The flag
F at a is transversal to a regular subvariety Z of W if each Fi is transversal to Z
at a [Hau04, Pan06].
Proposition 6.11. Let π : W 0 → W be the blowup of W along a center Z
transversal to a flag F at a ∈ Z. Let x1 , . . . , xn be local coordinates on W at a
subordinate to F. At each point a0 of E above a there exists a unique local flag F 0
such that the coordinates x01 , . . . , x0n on W 0 at a0 induced by x1 , . . . , xn as in def.
4.12 are subordinate to F 0 [Hau04] Thm. 1.
Definition 6.12. The flag F 0 is called the transform of F under π.
Proof. It suffices to define Fi0 at a0 by x0i+1 , . . . , x0n . For point blowups in W ,
the transform of F is defined as follows. The point a0 ∈ E is determined by a line
L in the tangent space Ta W of W at a. Let k ≤ n be the minimal index for which
Ta Fk contains L. For i < k, choose a regular (i + 1)-dimensional subvariety Hi of
W with tangent space L + Ta Fi at a. In particular, Ta Hk−1 = Ta Fk . Let His be
the strict transform of Hi in W 0 . Then set
Fi0 = E ∩ His
for i < k,
BLOWUPS AND RESOLUTION
Fi0 = Fis
to get the required flag F 0 at a0 .
33
for i ≥ k,
Examples
Example 6.13. Blow up A2 in 0 and compute the inverse image of the zerosets
of x + y 2 = 0, xy = 0 and x(x − y 2 ) = 0, as well as their strict transforms.
2
Example 6.14. . Compute the strict transform of X = V (x2 −y 3 , xy−z 3 ) ⊂ A3
under the blowup of the origin.
Example 6.15. Determine the total, weak and strict transform of X = V (x2 −
y , z 3 ) ⊂ A3 under the blowup of the origin. Clarify the algebraic and geometric
differences between them.
3
Example 6.16. Blow up A3 along the curve y 2 − x3 + x = z = 0 and compute
the strict transform of the lines x = z = 0 and y = z = 0.
Example 6.17. Let I1 and I2 be ideals of K[x] of order c1 and c2 at 0. Take
the blowup of An at zero. Show that the weak transform of I1c2 + I2c1 is the sum of
the weak transforms of I1c2 and I2c1 .
Example 6.18. . For W = A3 , a flag at a point a consists of a regular curve F1
through a and contained in a regular surface F2 . Blow up the point a in W , so that
E ' P2 is the projective plane. The induced flag at a point a0 above a depends on
the location of a on E: At the intersection point p1 of the strict transform C1 = F1s
of F1 with E, the transformed flag F 0 is given by F1s ⊂ F2s . Along the intersection
C2 of F2s with E, the flag F 0 is given at each point p2 different from p1 by C2 ⊂ F2s .
At any point p3 not on C2 the flag F 0 is given by C3 ⊂ E, where C3 is the projective
line in E through p1 and p3 .
Example 6.19. . Blowing up a regular curve Z in W = A3 transversal to F
there occur six possible configurations of Z with respect to F. Denoting by L the
plane in the tangent space Ta W of W at a corresponding to the point a0 in E above
a, these are: (1) Z = F1 and L = Ta F2 , (2) Z = F1 and L 6= Ta F2 , (3) Z 6= F1 ,
Z ⊂ F2 and L = Ta F2 , (4) Z 6= F1 , Z ⊂ F2 and L 6= Ta F2 , (5) Z 6⊂ F2 and
Ta F1 ⊂ L, (6) Z 6⊂ F2 and Ta F1 6⊂ L. Determine in each case the flag F 0 .
e n → An be the blowup of An in 0 and let a0 be the
Example 6.20. Let A
e
origin of the xn -chart of An . Compute the total and strict transforms
g ∗ and g s for
Q
d
e
d
g = x1 + . . . + xn−1 + xn for e = d, 2d − 1, 2d, 2d + 1 and g = i6=j (xi − xj ).
Example 6.21. Determine the total, weak and strict transform of X = V (x2 −
y , z 3 ) ⊂ A3 under the blowup of A3 at the origin. Point out the geometric differences between the three types of transforms.
3
Example 6.22. . The inclusion I g ⊂ I s can be strict. Blow up A2 at 0, and
e 2 the transforms of I = (x2 , y 3 ). Show that I g = (x2 , y),
consider in the y-chart of A
s
2
I = (x , 1) = K[x, y].
Example 6.23. . Let X = V (f ) be a hypersurface in An and Z a regular
closed subvariety which is contained in the locus of points of X where f attains its
e n → An be the blowup along Z and let X 0 = V (f 0 ) be
maximal order. Let π : A
the strict transform of X. Show that for points a ∈ Z and a0 ∈ E with π(a0 ) = a
the inequality orda0 f 0 ≤ orda f holds.
34
HERWIG HAUSER
7. Lecture VII: Resolution Statements
Definition 7.1. A non-embedded resolution of the singularities of a variety X
e together with a proper birational morphism π : X
e →X
is a non-singular variety X
e
which induces a biregular isomorphism π : X \ E → X \ Sing(X) outside E =
π −1 (Sing(X)).
Remark 7.2. Requiring properness excludes trivial cases as e.g. taking for
e the locus of regular points of X and for π the inclusion map. One may ask
X
for additional properties: (a) Any automorphism ϕ : X → X of X shall lift to an
e →X
e of X
e which commutes with π, i.e., π◦ϕ
automorphism ϕ
e:X
e = ϕ◦π. (b) If X is
defined over K and K ⊂ L is a field extension, any resolution of XL = X ×K Spec(L)
shall induce a resolution of X = XK .
Definition 7.3. A local non-embedded resolution of a variety X at a point
e a0 ) of a non-singular variety X
e together with a local morphism
a is the germ (X,
0
e
e and X.
π : (X, a ) → (X, a) inducing an isomorphism of the function fields of X
Definition 7.4. Let X be an affine irreducible variety with coordinate ring
R = K[X]. A (local, ring-theoretic) non-embedded resolution of X is a ring extene of R into a regular ring R
e having the same quotient field as R.
sion R ,→ R
Definition 7.5. Let X be a subvariety of a regular ambient variety W . An
f → W
embedded resolution of X consists of a proper birational morphism π : W
f
from a regular variety W onto W which is an isomorphism over W \ Sing(X) such
that the strict transform X s of X is regular and the total transform X ∗ = π −1 (X)
of X has simple normal crossings.
Definition 7.6. A strong resolution of a variety X is, for each closed embedf → W
ding of X into a regular variety W , a birational proper morphism π : W
satisfying the following five properties [EH02]:
f and the strict transform X s of X are regular,
Embeddedness. The variety W
f has simple normal crossings.
and the total transform X ∗ = π −1 (X) of X in W
Equivariance. Let W 0 → W be a smooth morphism and let X 0 be the inverse
f 0 → W 0 induced by π : X
e → W by taking
image of X in W 0 . The morphism π 0 : W
0
e
fiber product of X and W over W is an embedded resolution of X 0 .
e → X of π to X does not depend on the choice
Excision. The restriction τ : X
of the embedding of X in W .
Explicitness. The morphism π is a composition of blowups along regular centers
which are transversal to the exceptional loci created by the earlier blowups.
Effectiveness. There exists, for all varieties X, a local upper semicontinuous
invariant inva (X) in a well-ordered set Γ, depending only and up to isomorphism
of the completed local rings of X at a, such that: (a) inva (X) attains its minimal
value if and only if X is regular at a (or has normal crossings at a); (b) the top
locus S of inva (X) is closed and regular in X; (c) blowing up X along S makes
inva (X) drop at all points a0 above the points a of S.
Remark 7.7. (a) Equivariance implies the economy of the resolution, i.e., that
π : X s → X is an isomorphism outside Sing(X). It also implies that π commutes
BLOWUPS AND RESOLUTION
35
with open immersions, localization, completion, automorphisms of W stabilizing X
and taking cartesian products with regular varieties.
(b) One may require in addition that the centers of a resolution are transversal
to the inverse images of a given normal crossings divisor D in W , the boundary.
Definition 7.8. Let I be an ideal on a regular ambient variety W . A logf → W from a regular variety
resolution of I is a proper birational morphism π : W
f
W onto W which is an isomorphism over W \ Sing(I) such that I ∗ = π −1 (I) is a
f.
locally monomial ideal on W
Examples
Example 7.9. The blowup of the cusp X : x2 = y 3 in A2 at 0 produces a
non-embedded resolution. Further blouwps give an embedded resolution.
Example 7.10. . Determine the geometry at 0 of the hypersurfaces in A4
defined by the following equations:
(a) x + x7 − 3yw + y 7 z 2 + 17yzw5 = 0,
(b) x + x5 y 2 − 3yw + y 7 z 2 + 17yzw5 = 0,
(c) x3 y 2 + x5 y 2 − 3yw + y 7 z 2 + 17yzw5 = 0.
Example 7.11. Let X be the variety in A3C given by the equation (x2 − y 3 )2 =
(z − y 2 )3 . Show that the map α : A3 → A3 : (x, y, z) → (u2 z 3 , uyz 2 , uz 2 ), with
u(x, y) = x(y 2 − 1) + y, resolves the singularities of X. What is the inverse image
α−1 (Z)? Produce instructive pictures of X over R.
2
Example 7.12. Consider the inverse images of the cusp X = V (y 2 − x3 ) in A2
under the maps πx , πy : A2 → A2 , πx (x, y) = (x, xy), πy (x, y) = (xy, y). Factor the
maximal power of x, respectively y, from the equation of the inverse image of X
and show that the resulting equation defines in both cases a regular variety. Apply
the same process to the variety E8 = V (x2 + y 3 + z 5 ) ⊂ A3 repeatedly until all
resulting equations define non-singular varieties.
Example 7.13. Let R be the coordinate ring of an irreducible plane algebraic
e of R in the field of fractions of R is a regular ring
curve X. The integral closure R
e is the normalization of X [Mum99]
and thus resolves R. The resulting curve X
III.8, [dJP00] 4.4.
Example 7.14. . Consider a cartesian product X = Y × Z with Z a regular
variety. Show that a resolution of X can be obtained from a resolution Y 0 of Y by
taking the cartesian product Y 0 × Z of Y 0 with Z.
Example 7.15. Let X and Y be two varieties (schemes, analytic spaces) with
singular loci Sing(X) and Sing(Y ) respectively. Suppose that X 0 and Y 0 are regular
varieties (schemes, analytic spaces, within the same category as X and Y ) together
with proper birational morphisms π : X 0 → X and τ : Y 0 → Y which define
resolutions of X and Y respectively, and which are isomorphisms outside Sing(X)
and Sing(Y ). There is a naturally defined proper birational morphism f : X 0 ×Y 0 →
X × Y giving rise to a resolution of X × Y .
36
HERWIG HAUSER
8. Lecture VIII: Invariants of Singularities
Definition 8.1. A stratification of an algebraic variety X is a decomposition
of X into finitely many disjoint locally closed subvarieties Xi , called the strata,
[
˙
X=
Xi ,
i
such that the boundaries X i \ Xi of strata are unions of strata. This last property
is called the frontier condition. Two strata are called adjacent if one lies in the
closure of the other.
Definition 8.2. A local invariant on an algebraic variety X is a function
inv(X) : X → Γ from X to a well-ordered set (Γ, ≤) which associates to each point
a ∈ X an element inva (X) depending only on the formal isomorphism class of X at
bX,a ' O
bX,b , then inva (X) =
a: If (X, a) and (X, b) are formally isomorphic, viz O
invb (X). Usually, the ordering on Γ will also be total: for any c, d ∈ Γ either c ≤ d
or d ≤ c holds. The invariant is upper semicontinuous along a subvariety S of X if
for all c ∈ Γ, the sets
topS (inv, c) = {a ∈ S, inva (X) ≥ c}
are closed in S. If S = X, the map inv(X) is called upper semicontinuous.
Remark 8.3. The upper semicontinuity signifies that the value of inva (X)
can only go up or remain the same when a approaches a limit point. In the case
of schemes, the value of inv(X) also has to be defined and taken into account at
non-closed points of X.
Definition 8.4. Let X be a subvariety of a not necessarily regular ambient
variety W defined by an ideal I, and let Z be an irreducible subvariety of W defined
by the prime ideal J. The order of X or I in W along Z or with respect to J is the
maximal integer k = ordZ (X) = ordZ (I) such that IZ ⊂ JZk , where IZ = I · OW,Z
and JZ = J · OW,Z denote the ideals generated by I and J in the localization OW,Z
of W along Z. If Z = {a} is a point of W , the order of X and I at a is denoted by
orda (X) = orda (I) or ordma (X) = ordma (I).
Definition 8.5. Let R be a local ring with maximal ideal m. Let k ∈ N be
an integer. The k-th symbolic power J (k) of a prime ideal J is defined as the ideal
generated by all elements x ∈ R for which there is an element y ∈ R \ J such that
y · xk ∈ J k . Equivalently, J (k) = J k · RJ ∩ R.
Remark 8.6. The symbolic power is the smallest J-primary ideal containing
J k . If J is a complete intersection, the ordinary power J k and the symbolic power
J (k) coincide [ZS75] IV, [Hoc73], §12, [Pel88].
Proposition 8.7. Let X be a subvariety of a not necessarily regular ambient
variety W defined by an ideal I, and let Z be an irreducible subvariety of W defined
by the prime ideal J. The order of X along Z is the maximal integer k such that
I ⊂ J (k) .
Proof. This follows from the equality J k · RJ = (J · RJ )k .
Proposition 8.8. Let R be a noetherian local ring with maximal ideal m, and
b denote its completion with maximal ideal m
b Let I be an ideal of R,
let R
b = m · R.
b Then ordm (I) = ordm
b
with completion Ib = I · R.
(
I).
b
BLOWUPS AND RESOLUTION
37
b
Proof. If I ⊂ m k , then also Ib ⊂ m
b k , and hence ordm (I) ≤ ordm
b (I). ConT
i
versely, m = m
b ∩ R and i≥0 (I + m ) = Ib ∩ R by Lemma 2.26. Hence, if Ib ⊂ m
b k,
b
then I ⊂ Ib ∩ R ⊂ m
b k ∩ R = m k , so that ordm (I) ≥ ordm
b (I).
Definition 8.9. Let X be a subvariety of a regular variety W , and let a be a
point of W . The local top locus topa (X) of X at a with respect to the order is the
stratum S of points of an open neighborhood U of a in W where the order of X
equals the order of X at a. The top locus top(X) of X with respect to the order
is the (global) stratum S of points of W where the order of X attains its maximal
value. For c ∈ N, define topa (X, c) and top(X, c) as the local and global stratum
of points of W where the order of X is at least c.
Remark 8.10. The analogous definition holds for ideals on W and can be made
for other local invariants. By the upper semicontinuity of the order, the local top
locus of X at a is locally closed in W , and the top locus of X is closed in W .
Proposition 8.11. The order of a variety X or an ideal I in a regular variety
W at points of W defines an upper semicontinuous local invariant on W .
Proof. In characteristic zero, the assertion follows from the next proposition.
For the case of positive characteristic, see [Hir64] III.3, Cor. 1, p. 220.
Proposition 8.12. Over fields of zero characteristic, the local top locus topa (I)
of an ideal I at a is defined by the vanishing of all partial derivatives of elements
of I up to order o − 1, where o is the order of I at a.
Proof. In zero characteristic, a polynomial has order o at a point a if and
only if all its partial derivatives up to order o − 1 vanish at a.
Proposition 8.13. Let X be a subvariety of a regular ambient variety W . Let
Z be a non-singular subvariety of W and a a point on Z such that locally at a the
order of X is constant along Z, say equal to d = orda X = ordZ X. Consider the
blowup π : W 0 → W of W along Z with exceptional divisor E = π −1 (Z). Let a0 be
a point on E mapping under π to a. Denote by X ∗ , X g and X s the total, weak
and strict transform of X respectively (def. 6.1 and 6.2). Then, locally at a0 , the
order of X ∗ along E is d, and
orda0 X s ≤ orda0 X g ≤ d.
Proof. By Prop. 5.4 there exist local coordinates x1 , . . . , xn of W at a such
that Z is defined locally at a by x1 = . . . = xk = 0 for some k ≤ n, and such that
a0 is the origin of the x1 -chart of the blowup. Let I ⊂ OW,a be the local
P ideal of
X in W at a, and let f be an element of I. It has an expansion f = α∈Nn cα xα
with respect to the coordinates x1 , . . . , xn , with coefficients cα ∈ K.
Set α+ = (α1 , . . . , αk ). Since the order of X is constant along Z, the inequality
|α+ | = α1 + . . . + αk ≥ d holds whenever cα 6= 0. There is an element f with an
exponent α such that cα 6= 0 and such that |α| = |α+ | = d. The total transform
X ∗ and the weak transform X g are given locally at a0 by the ideal generated by
all
X
|α |
αn
2
f∗ =
cα x1 + xα
2 . . . xn ,
α∈Nn
38
HERWIG HAUSER
respectively
fg =
X
|α+ |−d α2
x2
cα x 1
n
. . . xα
n ,
α∈Nn
for f varying in I. The exceptional divisor E is given locally at a0 by the equation
x1 = 0. This implies that, locally at a0 , ordE f ∗ ≥ d for all f ∈ I and ordE f ∗ = d
for the special f chosen above with |α| = |α+ | = d. Therefore ordE X ∗ = d locally
at a0 .
Since orda0 f g ≤ |α− | ≤ d for the chosen f , it follows that orda0 X g ≤ d. The
ideal I s of the strict transform X s contains the ideal I g of the weak transform X g ,
thus also orda0 X s ≤ orda0 X g .
Corollary 8.14. If the order of X is globally constant along Z, the order of
X ∗ along E is globally equal to d.
Definition 8.15. Let X be a subvariety of a regular variety W , and let W 0 →
W be a blowup with center Z. Denote by X 0 the strict or weak transform in W 0 .
A point a0 ∈ W 0 above a ∈ Z is called infinitesimally near to a or equiconstant if
orda0 X 0 = orda X.
Definition 8.16. Let X be a variety defined over a field K, and let a be a
point of W . The Hilbert-Samuel function HSa (X) : N → N of X at a is defined by
k+1
k
HSa (X)(k) = dimK (mX,a
/mX,a
),
where mX,a denotes the maximal ideal of the local ring OX,a of X at a. If X is
a subvariety of a regular variety W defined by an ideal I, with local ring OX,a =
OW,a /I, one also writes HSa (I) for HSa (X).
Remark 8.17. The Hilbert-Samuel function does not depend on the embedding
of X in W . There exists a univariate polynomial P (t) ∈ Q[t], called the HilbertSamuel polynomial of X at a, such that HSa (X)(k) = P (k) for all sufficiently
large k [Ser00]. The Hilbert-Samuel polynomial provides local information on the
singularity of X at a point as e.g. the multiplicity and the local dimension.
Theorem 8.18. The Hilbert-Samuel function of a subvariety X of a regular
variety W defines an upper semicontinuous local invariant on X with respect to the
lexicographic ordering of integer sequences.
Proof. [Ben70] Thm. 4, p. 82, cf. also [Hau04].
Theorem 8.19. Let π : W 0 −→ W be the blowup of W along a non-singular
center Z. Let I be an ideal of OW . Assume that the Hilbert-Samuel function of I
is constant along Z, and denote by I s the strict transform of I in W 0 . Let a0 ∈ E
be a point in the exceptional divisor mapping under π to a. Then
HSa0 (I s ) ≤ HSa (I)
holds with respect to the lexicographic ordering of integer sequences.
Proof. [Ben70] Thm. 0, [Hau04].
Theorem 8.20. (Zariski-Nagata, [Hir64] III.3, Thm. 1, p. 218) Let S ⊂ T be
closed irreducible subvarieties of a closed subvariety X of a regular ambient variety
W . The order of X in W along T is less than or equal to the order of X in W
along S.
BLOWUPS AND RESOLUTION
39
Remark 8.21. In the case of schemes, the assertion says that if X is embedded
in a regular ambient scheme W , and a, b are points of X such that a lies in in the
closure of b, then ordb X ≤ orda X.
Proof. The proof goes in several steps and relies on the resolution of curves.
Let R be a regular local ring, m its maximal ideal, p a prime ideal in R and I 6= 0 a
non-zero ideal in R. Denote by νp (I) the maximal integer ν ≥ 0 such that I ⊂ pν .
Recall that ordp (I) is the maximal integer n such that IRp ⊂ pn Rp or, equivalently,
I ⊂ p(ν) , where p(ν) = pν Rp ∩ R denotes the ν-th symbolic power of p. Thus
νp (I) ≤ ordp (I) and the inequality can be strict if p is not a complete intersection,
in which case the usual and the symbolic powers of p may differ. Write ν(I) = νm (I)
for the maximal ideal m so that νp (I) ≤ ν(I) and νp (I) ≤ ν(IRp ) = ordp (I).
The assertion of the theorem is equivalent to the inequality ν(IRp ) ≤ ν(I),
taking for R the local ring OW,S of W along S, for I the ideal of R defining X in
W along S and for p the ideal defining T in W along S.
If R/p is regular, then νp (I) = ν(IRp ) because pn Rp ∩ R = pn : The inclusion
n
p ⊆ pn Rp ∩ R is clear, so suppose that x ∈ pn Rp ∩ R. Choose y ∈ pn and s 6∈ p
such that xs = y. Then n ≤ νp (y) = νp (xs) = νp (x) + νp (s) = νp (x), hence x ∈ pn .
It follows that ν(IRp ) ≤ ν(I).
It remains to prove the inequality in the case that R/p is not regular. Since
R is regular, there is a chain of prime ideals p = p0 ⊂ . . . ⊂ pk = m in R with
dim(Rpi /pi−1 Rpi ) = 1 for 1 ≤ i ≤ n. By induction on the dimension of R/p, it
therefore suffices to prove the inequality in the case dim(R/p) = 1. Since the order
remains constant under completion of a local ring by Prop. 8.8, it can be assumed
that R is complete.
By the resolution of curve singularities there exists a sequence of complete
regular local rings R = R0 → R1 → . . . → Rk with prime ideals p0 = p and pi ⊂ Ri
with the following properties:
(1) Ri+1 is the blowup of Ri with center the maximal ideal mi of Ri .
(2) (Ri+1 )pi+1 = (Ri )pi .
(3) Rk /pk is regular.
Set I0 = I and let Ii+1 be the weak transform of Ii under Ri → Ri+1 . Set R0 = Rk ,
I 0 = Ik and p0 = pk . The second condition on the blowups Ri of Ri−1 implies
ν(IRp ) = ν(I 0 Rp0 0 ). By Prop. 8.13 one knows that ν(I 0 ) ≤ ν(I). Further, since R0 /p0
is regular, ν(I 0 Rp0 0 ) ≤ ν(I 0 ). Combining these inequalities yields ν(IRp ) ≤ ν(I).
Proposition 8.22. An upper semicontinuous local invariant inv(X) : X → Γ
with values in a totally well ordered set Γ induces, up to refinement, a stratification
of X with strata Xc = {a ∈ X, inva (X) = c}, for c ∈ Γ.
Proof. For a given value c ∈ Γ, let S = {a ∈ X, inva (X) ≥ c} and T = {a ∈
X, inva (X) = c}. The set S is a closed subset of X. If c is a maximal value of
the invariant on X, the set T equals S and is thus a closed stratum. If c is not
maximal, let c0 > c be an element of Γ which is minimal with c0 > c. Such elements
exist since Γ is well-ordered. As Γ is totally ordered, c0 is unique. Therefore
S 0 = {a ∈ X, inva (X) ≥ c0 } = {a ∈ X, inva (X) > c} = S \ T
is closed in X. Therefore T is open in S and hence locally closed in X. As S
is closed in X and T ⊂ S, the closure T is contained in S. It follows that the
40
HERWIG HAUSER
boundary T \ T is contained in S 0 and closed in X. Refine the strata by replacing
S 0 by T \ T and S 0 \ T to get a stratification.
Examples
Example 8.23. The singular locus S = Sing(X) of a variety is closed and
properly contained in X. Let X1 = Reg(X) be the set of regular points of X.
It is open and dense in X. Repeat the procedure with X \ X1 = Sing(X). By
noetherianity, the process eventually stops, yielding a stratification of X in regular
strata. The strata of locally minimal dimension are closed and non-singular. The
frontier condition holds, since the regular points of a variety are dense in the variety,
and hence X 1 = X = X1 ∪˙ Sing(X).
Example 8.24. There exists a threefold X whose singular locus Sing(X) consists of two components, a non-singular surface and a singular curve meeting the
surface at a singular point of the curve. The stratification by iterated singular loci
as in the preceding example satisfies the frontier condition.
Example 8.25. . Give an example of a variety whose stratification by the
iterated singular loci has four different types of strata.
Example 8.26. Find interesting stratifications for three three-folds.
Example 8.27. The stratification of an upper semicontinuous invariant need
not be finite. Take for Γ the set X underlying a variety X with the trivial (partial)
ordering a ≤ b if and only if a = b.
Example 8.28. Let X be the non-reduced scheme defined by xy 2 = 0 in A2 .
The order of X at points of the y-axis outside 0 is 1, at points of the x-axis outside
0 it is 2, and at the origin it is 3. The local embedding dimension equals 1 at points
of the y-axis outside 0, and 2 at all points of the x-axis.
Example 8.29. Determine the stratification given by the order for the following varieties. If the smallest stratum is regular, blow it up and determine the
stratification of the strict transform. Produce pictures and describe the geometric
changes.
(a) Cross: xyz = 0,
(b) Whitney umbrella: x2 − yz 2 = 0,
(c) Kolibri: x3 + x2 z 2 − y 2 = 0,
(d) Xano: x4 + z 3 − yz 2 = 0,
(e) Cusp & Plane: (y 2 − x3 )z = 0.
Example 8.30. . Consider the order ordZ I of an ideal I in K[x1 , . . . , xn ]
along a closed subvariety Z of An , defined as the order of I in the localization
of K[x1 , . . . , xn ]J of K[x1 , . . . , xn ] at the ideal J defining Z in An . Express this in
terms of the symbolic powers J (k) = J k · K[x1 , . . . , xn ]J ∩ K[x1 , . . . , xn ] of J. Give
an example to show that ordZ I need not coincide with the maximal power k such
that I ⊂ J k . If J defines a complete intersection, the ordinary powers J k and the
symbolic powers J (k) coincide. This holds in particular when Z is a coordinate
subspace of An [ZS75] IV, §12, [Hoc73],[Pel88].
Example 8.31. . 2 The ideal I = (y 2 − xz, yz − x3 , z 2 − x2 y) of K[x, y, z] has
symbolic square I (2) which strictly contains I 2 .
2 This example is due to Macaulay and was kindly communicated by M. Hochster.
BLOWUPS AND RESOLUTION
41
Example 8.32. . The variety defined by I = (y 2 − xz, yz − x3 , z 2 − x2 y) in A3
has parametrization t 7→ (t3 , t4 , t5 ). Let f = x5 + xy 3 + z 3 − 3x2 yz. For all maximal
ideals m which contain I, f ∈ m 2 and thus, ordm f ≥ 2. But f 6∈ I 2 . Since xf ∈ I 2
and x does not belong to I, it follows that f ∈ I 2 RI and thus ordI f ≥ 2, in fact,
ordI f = 2.
Example 8.33. The order of an ideal depends on the embedding of X in W .
If X is not minimally embedded locally at a, the order of X at a is 1 and not
significant for measuring the complexity of the singularity of X at a.
Example 8.34. Associate to a stratification of a variety the so called Hasse
diagram, i.e., the directed graph whose nodes and edges correspond to strata, respectively to the adjacency of strata. Determine the Hasse diagram for the surface
X given in A4 as the cartesian product of the cusp C : x2 = y 3 with the node D :
x2 = y 2 +y 3 . Then project X to A3 by means of A4 → A3 , (x, y, z, w) 7→ (x, y+z, w)
and compute the Hasse diagram of the image Y of X under this projection.
Example 8.35. Show that the order of a hypersurface, the dimension and
the Hilbert-Samuel function of a variety, the embedding-dimension of a variety
and the local number of irreducible components are invariant under local formal
isomorphisms, and determine whether they are upper or lower semicontinuous. How
does each of these invariants behave under localization and completion?
Example 8.36. Take inva (X) = dima (X), the dimension of X at a. It is constant on irreducible varieties, and upper semicontinuous on arbitrary ones, because
at an intersection point of several components, dima (X) is defined as the maximum
of the dimensions of the components.
Example 8.37. Take inva (X) = the number of irreducible components of X
passing through a. If the components carry multiplicities as e.g. a divisor, one may
alternatively take the sum of the multiplicities of the components passing through
a. Both options produce an upper semicontinuous local invariant.
Example 8.38. Take inva (X) = embdima (X) = dim Ta X, the local embedding dimension of X at a. It is upper semicontinuous. At regular points, it equals
the dimension of X at a, at singular points it exceeds this dimension.
Example 8.39. . Consider for a given coordinate system x, y1 , . . . , yn on An+1
a polynomial of order c at 0 of the form
g(x, y1 , . . . , yn ) = xc +
c−1
X
gi (y) · xi .
i=0
Express the order and the top locus of g nearby 0 in terms of the orders of the
coefficients gi .
Example 8.40. Take inva (X) = HSa (X), the Hilbert-Samuel function of X
at a. The lexicographic order on integer sequences defines a well-ordering on Γ =
{γ : N → N}. Find two varieties X and Y with points a and b where HSa (X) and
HSb (Y ) only differ from the fourth entry on.
Example 8.41. Take inva (X) = νa∗ (X) the increasingly ordered sequence of
the orders of a minimal Macaulay basis of the ideal I defining X in W at a [Hir64]
III.1, def. 1 and Lemma 1, p. 205. It is upper semicontinuous but does not behave
42
HERWIG HAUSER
well under specialization [Hir64] III.3, Thm. 2, p. 220 and the remark after Cor. 2,
p. 220, see also [Hau98], ex. 12.
Example 8.42. Let a monomial order <ε on Nn be given, i.e., a total ordering
with minimal element 0 which is compatible with addition in Nn . The initial ideal
in(I) of an ideal I of K[[x1 , . . . , xn ]] with respect to <ε is the ideal generated by all
initial monomials of elements f of I, i.e., the monomials with minimal exponent
with respect to <ε in the series expansion of f . The initial monomial of 0 is 0.
The initial ideal is a monomial ideal in K[[x1 , . . . , xn ]] and depends on the
choice of coordinates. If the monomial order <ε is compatible with degree, in(I)
determines the Hilbert-Samuel function HSa (I) of I [Hau04].
Order monomial ideals totally by comparing their increasingly ordered unique
minimal monomial generator system lexicographically, where any two monomial
generators are compared with respect to <ε . If two monomial ideals have generator
systems of different length, complete the sequences of their exponents by a symbol
∞ so as to be able to compare them. This defines a well-order on the set of
monomial ideals.
Take for inva (X) the minimum min(I) or the maximum max(I) of the initial
ideal of the ideal I of X at a, the minimum and maximum being taken over all
choices of local coordinates, say regular parameter systems of K[[x1 , . . . , xn ]]. Both
exist and define local invariants which are upper semicontinuous with respect to
localization [Hau04] Thms. 3 and 8.
(a) The minimal initial ideal min(I) = minx {in(I)} over all choices of regular
parameter systems of K[[x1 , . . . , xn ]] is achieved for almost all regular parameter
systems.
(b)+ Let I be an ideal in K[x1 , . . . , xn ]. For a point a = (a1 , . . . , an ) ∈ An
denote by Ia the induced ideal in K[[x1 − an , . . . , xn − an ]]. The minimal initial
ideal min(Ia ) is upper semicontinuous when the point a varies.
(c) Compare the induced stratification of An with the stratification by the
Hilbert-Samuel function of I.
(d) Let Z be a regular center inside a stratum of the stratification induced by
e n → An along Z. Let
the initial ideal in(I), and consider the induced blowup A
0
0
a ∈ Z and a ∈ W be a point above a. Assume that the monomial order <ε is
compatible with degree. Show that mina (I) and maxa (I) do not increase when
passing to the strict transform of Ia at a0 [Hau04] Thm. 6.
Example 8.43. . Let (W 0 , a0 ) → (W, a) be the composition of two monomial
point blowups of W = A2 with respect to coordinates y, z, defined as follows. The
first is the blowup of A2 with center 0 considered at the origin of the y-chart, the
second has as center the origin of the y-chart and is considered at the origin of the
z-chart. Show that the order of the strict transform g 0 (y, z) at a0 of any non zero
polynomial g(y, z) in W is at most the half of the order of g(y, z) at a.
Example 8.44. (B. Schober) Let K be a non perfect field of characteristic 3,
let t ∈ K \ K2 be an element which is not a square. Stratify the hypersurface
X : x2 + y(z 2 + tw2 ) = 0 in A4 according to its singularities. Show that this
stratification does not provide suitable centers for a resolution.
Example 8.45. Let I = (x2 + y 17 ) be the ideal defining an affine plane curve
singularity X with singular locus the origin of W = A2 . The order of X at 0 is 2.
The blowup π : W 0 → W of W at the origin with exceptional divisor E is covered
BLOWUPS AND RESOLUTION
43
by two affine charts, the x- and the y-chart. The total and strict transform of I in
the x-chart are as follows:
I∗
=
(x2 + x17 y 17 ),
Is
=
(1 + x15 y 17 ).
At the origin of this chart, the order of I s has dropped to zero, so the strict
transform X s of X does not contain this point. Therefore it suffices to consider
the complement of this point in E, which lies entirely in the y-chart. There, one
obtains the following transforms:
I∗
=
(x2 y 2 + y 17 ),
Is
=
(x2 + y 15 ).
The origin a0 of the y-chart is the only singular point of X s . The order of X s at a0
has remained constant equal to 2. Find a local invariant of X which has improved
at a0 . Make sure that it does not depend on any choices.
Example 8.46. The ideal I = (x2 + y 16 ) has in the y-chart of the point blowup
of A2 at 0 the strict transform I s = (x2 + y 14 ). If the ground field has characteristic
2, the y-exponents 16 and 14 are irrelevant to measure an improvement of the
singularity because the coordinate change x 7→ x + y 8 transforms I into (x2 ).
Example 8.47. The ideal I = (x2 + 2xy 7 + y 14 + y 17 ) has in the y-chart the
strict transform I s = (x2 + 2xy 6 + y 12 + y 15 ). Here the drop of the y-exponent of
the last monomial from 17 to 15 is significant, whereas the terms 2xy 7 + y 14 can
be eliminated in any characteristic by the coordinate change x 7→ x + y 7 .
Example 8.48. The ideal I = (x2 + xy 9 ) = (x)(x + y 9 ) defines the union of two
non-singular curves in A2 which have a common tangent line at their intersection
point 0. The strict transform is I s = (x2 + xy 8 ). The degree of tangency, viz the
intersection multiplicity, has decreased.
Example 8.49. Let X and Y be two non-singular curves in A2 , meeting at one
point a. Show that there exists a sequence of point blowups which separates the
two curves, i.e., so that the strict transforms of X and Y do not intersect.
Example 8.50. Take I = (x2 + g(y)) where g is a polynomial in y with order
at least 3 at 0. The strict transform under point blowup in the y-chart is I s =
x2 + y −2 g(y), with order at 0 equal to 2 again. This suggests to take the order
of g as a secondary invariant. In characteristic 2 it may depend on the choice of
coordinates.
Example 8.51. Take I = (x2 + xg(y) + h(y)) where g and h are polynomials
in y of order at least 1, respectively 2, at 0. The order of I at 0 is 2. The strict
transform equals I s = (x2 + xy −1 g(y) + y −2 h(y)) of order 2 at 0. Here it is less
clear how to detect a secondary invariant which represents an improvement.
Example 8.52. Take I = (x2 + y 3 z 3 ) in A3 , and apply the blowup of A3 in
the origin. The strict transform of I in the y-chart equals I s = (x2 + y 4 z 3 ) and the
singularity seems to have gotten worse.
Example 8.53. . Let X be a surface in three-space, and S its top locus. Assume
that S is singular at a, and let X 0 be the blowup of X in a. Determine the top
locus of X 0 .
44
HERWIG HAUSER
9. Lecture IX: Hypersurfaces of Maximal Contact
Proposition 9.1. (Zariski) Let X be a subvariety of a regular variety W ,
defined over a field of arbitrary characteristic. Let W 0 → W be the blowup of W
along a regular center Z contained in the top locus of X, and let a be a point of
Z. There exists, in a neighbourhood U of a, a regular closed hypersurface V of U
whose strict transform V s in W 0 contains all points a0 of W 0 lying above a where
the order of the strict transform X s of X in W 0 has remained constant equal to
the order of X along Z.
Proof. Choose local coordinates x1 , . . . , xn of W at a. The associated graded
ring of OW,a can be identified with K[x1 , . . . , xn ]. Let in(I) ⊂ K[x1 , . . . , xn ] denote
the ideal of initial forms of elements of I at a. Apply a linear coordinate change
so that generators of in(I) are expressed with the minimal number of variables,
say x1 , . . . , xk , for some k ≤ n. Choose any 1 ≤ i ≤ k and define V in W at a by
xi = 0. It follows that the local top locus of X at a is contained in V . Hence Z ⊂ V ,
locally at a. Let a0 be a point of W 0 above a where the order of X has remained
constant. By Prop. 5.4 the local blowup (W 0 , a0 ) → (W, a) can be made monomial
by a suitable coordinate change. The assertion then follows by computation, cf. ex.
9.8 and [Zar44].
Definition 9.2. Let X be a subvariety of a regular variety W , and let a be
a point of W . A hypersurface of maximal contact for X at a is a regular closed
hypersurface V of an open neighborhood U of a in W such that
(1) V contains the local top locus S of X at a, i.e., the points of U where the
order of X equals the order of X at a.
(2) The strict transform V s of V under any blowup of U along a regular center
Z contained in S contains all points a0 above a where the order of X s has remained
constant equal to the order of X at a.
(3) Property (2) is preserved in any sequence of blowups with regular centers
contained in the successive top loci of the strict transforms of X along which the
order of X has remained constant.
a0 ∈ E ∩ V s ⊂ U 0 ⊂ W 0
↓
↓
↓π
a∈ Z ⊂ V ⊂U ⊂W
Definition 9.3. Assume that the characteristic of the ground field is zero.
Let X be a subvariety of a regular variety W defined locally at a point a of W by
the ideal I. Let o be the order of X at a. An osculating hypersurface for X at a
is a regular closed hypersurface V of a neighbourhood U of a in W defined by a
derivative of order o − 1 of an element f of order o of I [EH02].
Remark 9.4. The element f has necessarily order o at a, and its (o − 1)-st derivative has order 1 at a, so that it defines a regular hypersurface at a. The concept
is due to Abhyankar and Zariski [AZ55]. Abhyankar called the local isomorphism
constructing an osculating hypersurface V from a given regular hypersurface H of
W Tschirnhaus transformation. If H is given by xn = 0 for some coordinates
x1 , . . . , xn , this transformation eliminates from f all monomials whose xn -exponent
BLOWUPS AND RESOLUTION
45
is o − 1. The existence of osculating hypersurfaces was exploited systematically by
Hironaka in his proof of characteristic zero resolution [Hir64].
For each point a in X, osculating hypersurfaces contain locally at a the local
top locus S = topa (X), and their strict transform contain the equiconstant points
above a.
Proposition 9.5. (Abhyankar, Hironaka) Let X be a subvariety of a regular
variety W , and let a be a point of W . For ground fields of characteristic zero there
exist, locally at a in W , hypersurfaces of maximal contact for X. Any osculating
hypersurface V at a has maximal contact with X at a.
Proof. [EH02].
Remark 9.6. The assertion of the proposition does not hold over fields of
positive characteristic: R. Narasimhan, a student of Abhyankar, gave an example
of a hypersurface X in A4 over a field of characteristic 2 whose top locus is not
contained at 0 in any regular local hypersurface, and Kawanoue describes a whole
family of such varieties [Nar83, Kaw14], [Hau98], ex. 8. See also ex. 12.1 below. In
Narasimhan’s example, there is a sequence of point blowups for which there is no
regular local hypersurface V of A4 at 0 whose strict transforms contain all points
where the transforms of X have order 2 as at the beginning [Hau03] II.14, ex. 2, p.
388.
Remark 9.7. The existence of hypersurfaces of maximal contact in zero characteristic suggests to associate to X locally at a point a a variety Y defined by an
ideal J in the hypersurface V and to observe the behaviour of X under blowup by
means of the behaviour of Y under the induced blowup: the transform of Y under
the blowup of V along a center Z of W locally contained in V should equal the
variety Y 0 which is associated in a similar manner as Y to X to the strict transform
X s of X in V s at points a0 above a where the order of X s has remained constant.
The variety Y or the ideal J and their transforms may then help to measure the
improvement of X s at a0 by looking at their respective orders. This is precisely
the way how the proof of resolution in zero characteristic proceeds. The reasoning is also known as descent in dimension. The main problem in this approach is
to define properly the variety Y , respectively the ideal J, and to show that the
local construction is independent of the choice of V and patches to give a global
resolution algorithm.
a0 ∈ E ⊂ W 0
V0 ⊃Y0
↓
↓
↓
↓π
a∈ Z⊂W
↓ π|Y 0
V ⊃Y
Examples
Example 9.8. . Let π : (W 0 , a0 ) → (W, a) be a local blowup and let x1 , . . . , xn
be local coordinates on W at a such that π is monomial. Assume that x1 appears in
the initial form of an element f ∈ OW,a , and let V ⊂ W be the local hypersurface at
a defined by x1 = 0. If the order of the strict transform f s of f at a0 has remained
constant equal to the order of f at a, the point a0 belongs to the strict transform
V s of V .
46
HERWIG HAUSER
Example 9.9. Let the characteristic of the ground field be different from 3.
∂2
3
2
5
Apply the second order differential operator ∂ = ∂x
so
2 to f = x + x yz + z
that ∂f = 6x + 2yz. This defines a hypersurface of maximal contact for f at 0.
Replacing in f the variable x by x − 13 yz gives
1
2
g = x3 − xy 2 z 2 + y 3 z 3 + z 5 .
3
27
The term of degree 2 in x has been eliminated, and x = 0 defines an osculating
hypersurface for g at 0.
Example 9.10. . Assume that the characteristic is 0. Let XP⊂ An be a
d−1
hypersurface defined locally at the origin by a polynomial f = xdn + i=0 ai (y)xin
where y = (x1 , . . . , xn−1 ) and ord0 ai (y) ≥ d − i. Make the change of coordinates
xn 7→ xn − d1 ad−1 (y). Show that after this change, the hypersurface defined by
xn = 0 has maximal contact with X at the origin. What prevents this technique
from working in positive characteristic?
Example 9.11. . Consider the hypersurface X ⊂ A3 given by the equation
x y + xy 2 − x2 z + y 2 z − xz 2 − yz 2 = 0. Show that the hypersurface V given by
x = 0 does not have maximal contact with X at 0. In particular, consider the
blowup of A3 in the origin. Find a point a0 on the exceptional divisor that lies in
the x-chart of the blowup such that the strict transform of X has order 3 at a0 .
Then show that the strict transform of V does not contain this point.
2
Example 9.12. Hypersurfaces of maximal contact are only defined locally.
They need not patch to give a globally defined hypersurface of maximal contact on
W . Find an example for this.
Example 9.13. Consider f = x4 + y 4 + z 6 , g = x4 + y 4 + z 10 and h = xy + z 10
under point blowup. Determine, according to the characteristic of the ground field,
the points where the orders of f , g and h have remained constant.
Example 9.14. . Let f = xc + g(y1 , . . . , ym ) ∈ K[[x, y1 , . . . , ym ]] be a formal
power series with g a series of order ≥ c at 0. Show that there exists in any
characteristic a formal coordinate change maximizing the order of g.
Example 9.15. Let f = xc + g(y1 , . . . , ym ) ∈ K[x, y1 , . . . , ym ] be a polynomial
with g a polynomial of order ≥ c at 0. Does there exist a local coordinate change
in A1+m at 0 maximizing the order of g?
Example 9.16. Let f be a polynomial or power series in n variables x1 , . . . , xn
of order c at 0. Assume that the ground field is infinite. There exists a linear
coordinate change after which f (0, . . . , 0, xn ) has order c at 0. Such polynomials
and series, called xn -regular of order c at 0, appear in the Weierstrass preparation
theorem, which was frequently used by Abhyankar in resolution arguments.
Example 9.17. . Let (W 0 , a0 ) → (W, a) be a composition of local blowups in
regular centers such that a0 lies in the intersection of n exceptional components
where n is the dimension of W at a. Let f ∈ OW,a and assume that the characteristic is zero. Show that the order of f has dropped between a and a0 .
Example 9.18. + Show the same in positive characteristic.
BLOWUPS AND RESOLUTION
47
10. Lecture X: Coefficient Ideals
Definition 10.1. Let I be an ideal in a regular variety W , let a be a point of
W with open neighbourhood U , and let V be a regular closed hypersurface of U
containing a. Let x1 , . . . , xn be coordinates on U such that V is defined in U by
xn = 0. The restrictions of x1 , . . . , xn−1 toP
V form coordinates on V and will be
abbreviated by x0 . For f ∈ OU , denote by
af,i (x0 ) · xin the expansion of f with
respect to xn , with coefficients af,i = af,i (x0 ) ∈ OV . The coefficient ideal of I in V
at a is the ideal JV (I) on V defined by
JV (I) =
o−1
X
o!
(af,i , f ∈ I) o−i ,
i=0
where o denotes the order of I at a.
Remark 10.2. The coefficient ideal is defined on whole V . It depends on the
choice of the coordinates x1 , . . . , xn on U , even so the notation only refers to V .
Actually, JV (I) depends on the choice of a section OV,a → OU,a of the map OU,a →
OV,a defined by restriction to V . The same definition applies to stalks of ideals in
W at points a, giving rise to an ideal, also denoted by JV (I), in the local ring OV,a .
o!
The weights o−i
in the exponents are chosen so as to obtain a systematic behavior
of the coefficient ideal under blowup, cf. Prop. 10.6 below. The chosen algebraic
definition of the coefficient ideal is modelled so as to commute with blowups [EH02],
but is less conceptual than definitions through differential operators proposed and
used by Encinas-Villamayor, Bierstone-Milman, Wlodarczyk, Kawanoue-Matsuki
and Hironaka [EV00, EV98, BM97, Wlo05, KM10, Hir03].
Proposition 10.3. The passage to the coefficient ideal JV (I) of I in V commutes with taking germs along the local top locus S = topa (I) ∩ V of points of
V where the order of I in W is equal to the order of I in W at a: Let x1 , . . . xn
be coordinates of W at a, defined on an open neighborhood U of a, and let V be
closed and regular in U , defined by xn = 0. The stalks of JV (I) at points b of S
inside U coincide with the coefficient ideals of the stalks of I at b.
Proof. Clear from the definition of coefficient ideals.
Corollary 10.4. In the above situation, for any fixed closed hypersurface V
in U ⊂ W open, the order of JV (I) at points of S ∩ V is upper semicontinuous
along S, locally at a.
Remark 10.5. In general, V need not contain, locally at a, the top locus of I
in W . This can, however, be achieved in zero characteristic by choosing for V an
osculating hypersurface, cf. Prop. 10.9 below. In this case, the order of JV (I) at
points of S = topa (I) does not depend on the choice of the hypersurface, cf. Prop.
10.13. In arbitrary characteristic, a local hypersurface V will be chosen separately
at each point b ∈ S in order to maximize the order of JV (I) at b, cf. Prop. 10.11.
In this case, the order of JV (I) at b does not depend on the choice of V , and its
upper semicontinuity as b moves along S holds again, but is more difficult to prove
[Hau04].
Proposition 10.6. The passage to the coefficient ideal JV (I) of I at a commutes with blowup: Let π : W 0 → W be the blowup of W along a regular center
Z contained locally at a in S = topa (I). Let V be a local regular hypersurface of
48
HERWIG HAUSER
W at a containing Z and such that V s contains all points a0 above a where the
order of the weak transform I g has remained constant equal to the order of I at
a. For any such point a0 , the coefficient ideal JV s (I g ) of I g equals the controlled
−c
transform JV (I)! = IE
· JV (I)∗ of JV (I) with respect to the control c = o! with
o = orda (I).
Proof. Write V 0 for V s , and let h = 0 be a local equation of E ∩V 0 in V 0 . The
weak transform I g of I is generated by the elements f g = h−o · f ∗ for f varying in
I, where ∗ denotes the total transform. The coefficients af,i of the monomials xin
of the expansion of an element f of I of order o at a in the coordinates x1 , . . . , xn
satisfy af g ,i = hi−o · (af,i )∗ . Then
X
JV 0 (I g ) = JV 0 (
af g ,i · xin , f g ∈ I g )
i
X
= JV 0 (
ah−o ·f ∗ ,i · xin , f ∈ I)
i
X
= JV 0 (
h−o · (af,i · xin )∗ , f ∈ I)
i
=
X
h−o! · (a∗f,i , f ∈ I)o!/(o−i)
i<o
−o!
=h
·(
X
(af,i , f ∈ I)o!/(o−i) )∗
i<o
= h−o! · (JV I)∗ = (JV I)! .
This proves the claim.
Remark 10.7. The definitions of the coefficient ideal used in [EV00, EV98,
BM97, Wlo05, KM10, Hir03] produce a weaker commutativity property with respect to blowups, typically only for the radicals of the coefficient ideals.
Remark 10.8. The order of the coefficient ideal JV (I) of I is not directly
suited as a secondary invariant when the order of I remains constant since, by the
proposition, the coefficient ideal passes under blowup to its controlled transform,
and thus its order may increase. In order to get a practicable secondary invariant
it is appropriate to decompose JV (I) and (JV (I))! into products of two ideals: the
first factor is a principal monomial ideal supported by the exceptional locus, the
second, possibly singular factor, is an ideal called the residual factor, and supposed
to pass under blowup in the factorization to its weak transform. Choosing suitably
the exceptional monomial factor it can be shown that such factorizations always
exist [EH02]. In this situation the order of the residual factor does not increase
under blowup by Prop. 8.13 and can thus serve as a secondary invariant whenever
the order of the ideal I remains constant under blowup.
Proposition 10.9. Assume that the characteristic of the ground field is zero.
Let I have order o at a point a ∈ W , and let V be a regular hypersurface for I at
a, with coefficient ideal J = JV (I). The locus topa (J, o!) of points of V where J
has order ≥ o! coincides with topa (I),
topa (J, o!) = topa (I).
BLOWUPS AND RESOLUTION
49
Proof. Choose local coordinates x1 , . . . , xn in W at a so that V is defined by
xn = 0. Expand the elements f of I with respect to xn with coefficients af,i ∈ OV,a ,
and choose representatives of them on a suitable neighbourhood of a. Let b be a
point in a sufficiently small neighborhood of a. Then, by the upper semicontinuity
of
P the order,i b belongs to topa (I) if and only if ordb I ≥ o, which is equivalent to
i<o af,i · xn having order ≥ o at b for all f ∈ I. This, in turn, holds if and only if
o!
o−i
af,i has order ≥ o − i at b, say af,i
has order ≥ o! at b. Hence b ∈ topa (I) if and
only if b ∈ topa (JV (I), o!).
Corollary 10.10. Assume that the characteristic of the ground field is zero.
Let a be a point in W and set S = topa (I). Let U be a neighbourhood of a on
which there exists a closed regular hypersurface V which is osculating for I at all
points of S ∩ U . Let JV (I) be the coefficient ideal of I in V .
(a) The top locus topa (JV (I)) of JV (I) on V is contained in topa (I).
(b) The blowup of U along a regular locally closed subvariety Z of topa (JV (I))
Z commutes with the passage to the coefficient ideals of I and I g in V and V s .
Proof. Assertion (a) is immediate from the proposition, and (b) follows from
Prop. 10.6.
Proposition 10.11. (Encinas-Hauser) Assume that the characteristic of the
ground field is zero. The order of the coefficient ideal JV (I) of I at a with respect
to an osculating hypersurface V at a attains the maximal value of the orders of the
coefficient ideals over all local regular hypersurfaces. In particular, it is independent
of the choice of V .
Proof. Choose local coordinates x1 , . . . , xn in W at a such that the appropriate derivative of the chosen element f ∈ I is given by xn . Let o be the order of
f at a. The choice of coordinates implies that the expansion of f with respect to
xn has a monomial xon with coefficient 1 and no monomial in xn of degree o − 1.
Any other local regular hypersurface U is obtained from V by a local isomorphism
ϕ of W at a. Assume that the order of JV (ϕ∗ (I)) is larger than the order of
o!
o−i
is larger
JV (I). Let g = ϕ∗ (f ). This signifies that the order of all coefficients ag,i
∗
than the order of JV (I). Therefore ϕ must eliminate from f the terms of af,i for
o!
o−i
which af,i
has order equal to the order of JV (I). But then ϕ∗ produces from xon a
non-zero coefficient ag,o−1 such that ao!
g,o−1 has order equal to the order of JV (I),
contradiction.
Remark 10.12. This result suggests to consider in positive characteristic as a
substitute for hypersurfaces of maximal contact local regular hypersurfaces which
maximize the order of the associated coefficient ideal. Such hypersurfaces are used
in recent approaches to resolution of singularities in positive characteristic [Hir12,
Hau10a, HW14], relying on the work of Moh on the behaviour of the coefficient
ideal in this situation [Moh87].
Proposition 10.13. Let the characteristic of the ground field be arbitrary.
The supremum in N ∪ {∞} of the orders of the coefficient ideals JV (I) of I in local
regular hypersurfaces V in W at a is realized by a formal local regular hypersurface
eW,a ). If
V in W at a (i.e., V is defined by an element of the complete local ring O
50
HERWIG HAUSER
the supremum is finite, it can be realized by a local regular hypersurface V in W
at a.
Proof. If the supremum is finite, the existence of some V realizing this value is
bW,a to construct
obvious. If the supremum is infinite, one uses the completeness of O
V , see [EH02, Hau04].
Definition 10.14. A formal local regular hypersurface V realizing the supremum of the order of the coefficient ideal JV (I) of I at a is called a hypersurface of
weak maximal contact of I at a. If the supremum is finite, it will always be assumed
to be a local hypersurface.
Proposition 10.15. (Zariski) Let V be a formal local regular hypersurface in
W at a of weak maximal contact with I at a. Let π : W 0 → W be the blowup of W
along a closed regular center Z contained locally at a in S = topa (I). The points
a0 ∈ W 0 above a for which the order of the weak transform I g of I at a0 has not
decreased are contained in the strict transform V s of V .
Proof. By definition of weak maximal contact, the variable xn defining V in
W at a appears in the initial form of some element f of I of order o = topa (I) at
a, cf. ex. 10.23 below. The argument then goes analogously to the proof of Prop.
9.1.
Remark 10.16. In characteristic zero and if V has been chosen osculating at
a, the hypersurface V 0 is again osculating at points a0 above a where orda0 (I 0 ) =
orda (I), hence it has again weak maximal contact with I 0 at such points a0 . In
positive characteristic this is no longer true, cf. ex. 10.24.
Examples
e2
Example 10.17. Determine in all characteristics the points of the blowup A
2
4
2 2
4
7
8
9
of A at 0 where the strict transform of g = x + kx y + y + 3y + 5y + 7y under
the blowup of A2 at 0 has order 4, for any k ∈ N.
Example 10.18. Determine for all characteristics the maximal order of the
coefficient ideal of I = (x3 + 5y 3 + 3(x2 y 2 + xy 4 ) + y 6 + 7y 7 + y 9 + y 10 ) in regular
local hypersurfaces V at 0.
Example 10.19. Same as before for I = (xy + y 4 + 3y 7 + 5y 8 + 7y 9 ).
Example 10.20. . Compute the coefficient ideal of I = (x5 + x2 y 4 + y k ) in
the hypersurfaces x = 0, respectively y = 0. According to the value of k and the
characteristic, which hypersurface is osculating or has weak maximal contact?
Example 10.21. . Consider f = x2 + y 3 z 3 + y 7 + z 7 . Show that V ⊂ A3
defined by x = 0 is a local hypersurface of weak maximal contact for f . Blow
up A3 at the origin. How does the order of the coefficient ideal of f in V behave
under these blowups at the points where the order of f has remained constant?
Factorize suitably the controlled transform of the coefficient ideal with respect to
the exceptional factor and observe the behaviour of the order of the residual factor.
Example 10.22. . Assume that, for a given coordinate system x1 , . . . , xn in W
at a, the hypersurface V defined by xn = 0 is osculating for a polynomial f and
that the coefficient ideal of f in V is a principal monomial ideal. Show that there
BLOWUPS AND RESOLUTION
51
is a sequence of blowups in coordinate subspaces of the induced affine charts which
eventually makes the order of f drop.
Example 10.23. The variable xn defining a hypersurface V in W at a of weak
maximal contact with an ideal I appears in the initial form of some element f of I
of order o = orda (I) at a.
Example 10.24. In positive characteristic, a hypersurface of weak maximal
contact for an ideal I need not have again weak maximal contact after blowup with
the weak transform I g at points a0 where the order of I g has remained constant.
Example 10.25. Compute in the following situations the coefficient ideal of
I in W at a with respect to the given local coordinates x, y, z in A3 and the
hypersurface V . Determine in each case whether the order of the coefficient ideal
is maximal. If not, find a coordinate change which maximizes it.
(a) a = 0 ∈ A1 , x, V : x = 0, I = (x) and I = (x + x2 ).
(b) a = 0 ∈ A2 , x, y, V : x = 0, I = (x), I = (x + y 2 ), I = (y + x2 ), I = (xy).
(c) a = (1, 0, 0) ∈ A3 , x, y, z, V : y + z = 0, I = (x2 ), I = (xy), I = (x3 + z 3 ).
(d) a = 0 ∈ A3 , x, y, z, V : x = 0, I = (xyz), I = (x2 + y 3 + z 5 ).
(e) a = 0 ∈ A2 , x, y, V : x = 0, I = (x2 + y 4 , y 4 + x2 ).
Example 10.26. Blow up in each of the preceding examples the origin and
determine the points of the exceptional divisor E where the order of the weak
transform I g of I has remained constant. Check at these points whether commutativity holds for the descent to the coefficient ideal and its controlled transform.
Example 10.27. . Show that the maximum of the order of the coefficient ideal
bAn ,0 is attained (it might
JV (I) of an ideal I over all regular parameter systems of O
be ∞).
Example 10.28. Show that the supremum of the order of the coefficient ideal
of an ideal I in W at a point a can be realized, if the supremum is finite, by a regular
system of parameters of the local ring OW,a without passing to the completion.
Example 10.29. + Show that this maximum, when taken at any point of the
top locus S of An where I has maximal order o, defines an upper semicontinuous
function on S.
Example 10.30. . Let V be the hypersurface xn = 0 of An and let V 0 → V
be the blowup with regular center Z in V . Let I be an ideal of order o at a point
a of Z, with weak transform I g . Assume that orda0 I g = orda I at the origin a0 of
an xj -chart for a j < n. Compare the controlled transform of the coefficient ideal
JV (I) of I with respect to the control c = o! with the coefficient ideal JV 0 (I g ) of
I g.
Example 10.31. Show that, in characteristic zero, the top locus of an ideal I
of W , when taken locally at a point a, is contained in a local regular hypersurface V
through a. Does this hypersurface maximize the order of the associated coefficient
ideal?
Example 10.32. Consider f = x3 + y 2 z in A3 and the point blowup of A3 at
the origin. Find, according to the characteristic, at all points of the exceptional
divisor a hypersurface of weak maximal contact for the strict transform of f .
52
HERWIG HAUSER
Example 10.33. Consider surfaces defined by polynomials f = xo +y a z b ·g(y, z)
where y a z b is considered as an exceptional monomial factor of the coefficient ideal
in the hypersurface V defined by x = 0 (up to raising the coefficient ideal to the
power c = o!). Assume that a + b + ord0 g ≥ o. Give three examples where the order
of g at 0 is not maximal over all choices of local hypersurfaces at 0, and indicate
the coordinate changes which make it maximal.
Example 10.34. Consider surfaces defined by polynomials f = xo +y a z b ·g(y, z)
where y a z b is considered again as an exceptional monomial factor of the coefficient
ideal in the hypersurface V defined by x = 0. Assume that a + b + ord0 g ≥ o.
0
0
Compute the strict transform f 0 = xo + y a z b · g 0 (y, z) of f under point blowup at
points where the order of f has remained equal to o. Find three examples where
the order of g 0 is not maximal over all local coordinate choices.
Example 10.35. For a flag of local regular subvarieties Vn−1 ⊃ . . . ⊃ V1 at
a in W = An one gets from an ideal I = In in W a chain of coefficient ideals
Jn−1 , . . . , J1 in Vn−1 , . . . , V1 respectively, defined recursively as follows. Assume
that Jn−1 , . . . , Ji+1 have been constructed and that Ji+1 can be decomposed into
Ji+1 = Mi+1 · Ii+1 with prescribed monomial factor Mi+1 and some residual factor
Ii+1 . Then set Ji = JVi (Ii+1 ), the coefficient ideal of Ii+1 in Vi at a. Show that the
lexicographic maximum of the vector of orders of the ideals Ji at a over all choices
of flags at a admitting the above factorizations of the ideals Ji can be realized
stepwise, choosing first a local hypersurface Vn−1 in W at a maximizing the order
of Jn−1 at a, then a local hypersurface Vn−2 in Vn−1 at a maximizing the order of
Jn−2 , and iterating this process.
11. Lecture XI: Resolution in Zero Characteristic
The inductive proof of resolution of singularities in characteristic zero requires a
more detailed statement about the nature of the resolution:
Theorem 11.1. Let W be a regular ambient variety and let E ⊂ W be a
(possibly empty) divisor with normal crossings. Assume that the characteristic of
the ground field is 0. Let J be an ideal on W , together with a decomposition
J = M · I into a principal monomial ideal M , the monomial factor of J, supported
on a normal crossings divisor D transversal to E, and an ideal I, the residual factor
of J. Let c+ ≥ 1 be a given number, the control of J.
There exists a sequence of blowups of W along regular centers Z transversal
to E and D and their total transforms, contained in the locus top(J, c+ ) of points
where J and its controlled transforms with respect to c+ have order ≥ c+ , and
satisfying the requirements equivariance and excision of a strong resolution so that
the order of the controlled transform of J with respect to c+ drops eventually at
all points below c+ .
Definition 11.2. In the situation of the theorem, with prescribed divisor D
and control c+ , the ideal J is called resolved with respect to D and c+ if the order
of J at all points of W is < c+ .
Remark 11.3. Once the order of the controlled transform of J has dropped
below c+ , induction on the order can be applied to find an additional sequence of
blowups which makes the order of the controlled transform of J drop everywhere
BLOWUPS AND RESOLUTION
53
to 0. At that stage, the controlled transform of J has become the whole coordinate
ring of W , and the total transform of J, which differs from the controlled transform
by a monomial exceptional factor, has become a monomial ideal supported on a
normal crossings divisor D transversal to E. This establishes the existence of a
strong embedded resolution of J, respectively of the singular variety X defined by
J in W .
Proof. The technical details can be found in [EH02], and motivations are
given in [Hau03]. The main argument is the following.
The resolution process has two different stages: In the first, a sequence of
blowups is chosen through a local analysis of the singularities of J and by induction
on the ambient dimension. The order of the weak transforms of I will be forced
to drop eventually below the maximum of the order of I at the points a of W .
By induction on the order one can then apply additional blowups until the order
of the weak transform of I has become equal to 0. At that moment, the weak
transform of I equals the coordinate ring/structure sheaf of the ambient variety,
and the controlled transform of J has become a principal monomial ideal supported
on a suitable transform of D, which will again be a normal crossings divisor meeting
the respective transform of E transversally.
For simplicity, denote this controlled transform again by J. It is a principal
monomial ideal supported by exceptional components. The second stage of the
resolution process makes the order of J drop below c+ . The sequence of blowups
is now chosen globally according to the multiplicities of the exceptional factors
appearing in J. This is a completely combinatorial and quite simple procedure
which can be found in many places in the literature [Hir64, EV00, EH02].
The first part of the resolution process is much more involved and will be
described now. The centers of blowup are defined locally at the points where the
order of I is maximal. Then it is shown that the definition does not depend on the
local choices and thus defines a global, regular and closed center in W . Blowing up
W along this center will improve the singularities of I, and finitely many further
blowups will make the order of the weak transform of I drop.
The local definition of the center goes as follows. Let S = top(I) be the stratum
of points in W where I has maximal order. Let a be a point of S and denote by
o the order of I at a. Choose an osculating hypersurface V for I at a in an open
neighbourhood U of a in W . This is a closed regular hypersurface of U given by
a suitable partial derivative of an element of I of order o − 1. The hypersurface V
maximizes the order of the coefficient ideal Jn−1 = JV (I) over all choices of local
regular hypersurfaces, cf. Prop. 10.11. Thus orda (Jn−1 ) does not depend on the
choice of V . There exists a closed stratum T in S at a of points b ∈ S where the
order of Jn−1 equals the order of Jn−1 at a.
The ideal Jn−1 on V together with the new control c = o! can now be resolved by
induction on the dimension of the ambient space, applying the respective statement
of the theorem. The new normal crossings divisor En−1 in V is defined as V ∩ E.
For this it is necessary that the hypersurface V can be chosen transversal to E. This
is indeed possible, but will not be shown here. Also, it is used that Jn−1 admits
again a decomposition Jn−1 = Mn−1 · In−1 with Mn−1 a principal monomial ideal
supported on some normal crossings divisor Dn−1 on V , and In−1 an ideal, the
residual factor of Jn−1 .
54
HERWIG HAUSER
There thus exists a sequence of blowups of V along regular centers transversal
to En−1 and Dn−1 and their total transforms, contained in the locus top(Jn−1 , c)
of points where Jn−1 and its controlled transforms with respect to c have order ≥ c,
and satisfying the requirements of a strong resolution so that the order of the weak
transform of In−1 drops eventually at all points below the maximum of the order
of In−1 at points a of V .
All this is well defined on the open neighbourhood U of a in W , but depends
a priori on the choice of the hypersurface V , since the centers are chosen locally
in each V . It is not clear that the local choices patch to give a globally defined
center. One can show that this is indeed the case, even though the local ideals Jn−1
do depend on V . The argument relies on the fact that the centers of blowup are
constructed as the maximum locus of an invariant associated to Jn−1 . By induction
on the ambient dimension, such an invariant exists for each Jn−1 : In dimension 1,
it is just the order. In higher dimension, it is a vector of orders of suitably defined
coefficient ideals. One then shows that the invariant of Jn−1 is independent of the
choice of V and defines an upper semicontinuous function on the stratum S. Its
maximum locus is therefore well defined and closed. Again by induction on the
ambient dimension, it can be assumed that it is also regular and transversal to the
divisors En−1 and Dn−1 .
By the assertion of the theorem in dimension n − 1, the order of the weak
transform of Jn−1 can be made everywhere smaller than c = o! by a suitable
sequence of blowups. The sequence of blowups also transforms the original ideal
J = M · I, producing controlled transforms of J and weak transforms of I. The
order of I cannot increase in this sequence, if the centers are always chosen inside S.
To achieve this inclusion a technical adjustment of the definition of coefficient ideals
is required which will be omitted here. If the order of I drops, induction applies.
So one is left to consider points where possible the order of the weak transform
has remained constant. There, one will use the commutativity of blowups with the
passage to coefficient ideals, Prop. 10.6: The coefficient ideal of the final transform
of I will equal the controlled transform of the coefficient ideal Jn−1 of I. But the
order of this controlled transform has dropped below c, hence, by Prop. 10.9, also
the order of the weak transform of I must have dropped. This proves the existence
of a resolution.
Examples
Example 11.4. In the situation of the theorem, take W = A2 , E = ∅, and
J = (x2 y 3 ) = 1 · I with control c+ = 1. The ideal J is monomial, but not resolved
yet, since it is not supported on the exceptional divisor. It has order 5 at 0, order
3 along the x-axis, and order 2 along the y-axis. Blow up A2 in 0. The controlled
transform in the x-chart is J ! = (x4 y 3 ) with exceptional factor IE = (x4 ) and
residual factor I1 = (y 3 ), the strict transform of J. The controlled transform in
the y-chart is J ! = (x2 y 4 ) with exceptional factor IE = (y 4 ) and residual factor
I1 = (x2 ), the strict transform of J. One additional blowup resolves J.
Example 11.5. In the situation of the preceding example, replace E = ∅ by
E = V (x + y), respectively E = V (x + y 2 ), and resolve the ideal J.
Example 11.6. Take W = A3 , E = V (x + z 2 ), and J = (x2 y 3 ) with control
c+ = 1. The variety X defined by J is the union of the xz- and the yz-plane. The
BLOWUPS AND RESOLUTION
55
top locus of J is the z-axis, which is tangent to E. Therefore it is not allowed to
take it as the center of the first blowup. The only possible center is the origin.
Applying this blowup, the top locus of the controlled transform of J and the total
transform of E have normal crossings, so that the top locus can now be chosen as
the center of the next blowup. Resolve the singularities of X.
Remark 11.7. The non-transversality of the candidate center of blowup with
already existing exceptional components is known as the transversality problem.
The preceding example gives a first instance of the problem, see [EH02, Hau03] for
more details.
Example 11.8. Take W = A3 , E = D = ∅ and J = (x2 + yz). In characteristic
different from 2, the origin of A3 is the unique isolated singular point of the cone
X defined by J. The ideal J has order 2 at 0. After blowing up the origin, the
singularity is resolved and the strict transform of J defines a regular surface. It is
transversal to the exceptional divisor.
Example 11.9. Take W = A3 , E = D = ∅, J = (x2 + y a z b ) with a, b ∈ N.
According to the values of a and b, the top locus of J is either the origin, the yor z-axis, or the union of the y- and the z-axis. If a + b ≥ 2, the yz-plane is a
hypersurface of maximal contact for J at 0. The coefficient ideal is J1 = (y a z b )
(up to raising it to the square). This is a monomial ideal, but not supported yet
on exceptional components. Resolve J.
Example 11.10. Take W = A4 , E = D = V (yz), J = (x2 + y 2 z 2 (y + w)).
The order of J at 0 is 2. The yzw-hyperplane has maximal contact with J at
0, with coefficient ideal J1 = y 2 z 2 (y + w), in which the factor M1 = (y 2 z 2 ) is
exceptional and I1 = (y + w) is residual. Resolve J. The top locus of I1 is the
plane V (y + w) ⊂ A3 , hence not contained in the top locus of J. This technical
complication is handled by introducing an intermediate ideal, the companion ideal
[Vil07, EH02].
Example 11.11. Compute the first few steps of the resolution process for the
three surfaces defined in A3 by the polynomials x2 + y 2 z, x2 + y 3 + z 5 and x3 +
y 4 z 5 + z 11 .
Example 11.12. Prove with all details the embedded resolution of plane curves
in characteristic zero according to the above description.
Example 11.13. Resolve the following items according to Thm. 11.1, taking
into account different characteristics of the ground field.
(a) W = A2 , E = ∅, J = I = (x2 y 3 ), with control c+ = 1.
(b) W = A2 , E = V (x), J = (x2 y 3 ), c+ = 1.
(c) W = A2 , E = V (xy), J = (x2 y 3 ), c+ = 1.
(d) W = A3 , E = V (x + z 2 ), J = (x2 y 3 ), c+ = 1.
(e) W = A3 , E = V (y + z), J = (x3 + (y + z)z 2 ), c+ = 3.
(f) W = A3 , E = ∅, J = I = (x2 + yz), c+ = 2.
(g) W = A3 , E = ∅, J = I = (x3 + y 2 z 2 ), c+ = 3.
(h) W = A3 , E = ∅, J = I = (x2 + xy 2 + y 5 ), c+ = 2.
(i) W = A3 , E = ∅, J = I = (x2 + xy 3 + y 5 ), c+ = 2.
(j) W = A3 , E = V (x + y 2 ), J = (x3 + (x + y 2 )y 4 z 5 ), c+ = 3.
(k) W = A3 , E = ∅, J = I = (x2 + y 2 z 2 (y + z)), c+ = 12.
56
HERWIG HAUSER
(l) W = A3 , E = V (yz), J = (x2 + y 2 z 2 (y + z)), c+ = 2.
(m) W = A4 , E = V (yz), J = (x2 + y 2 z 2 (y + w)), c+ = 2.
Example 11.14. Consider J = I = (x2 + y 7 + yz 4 ) in A3 , with E = ∅ and
c+ = 2. Consider the sequence of three point blowups with the following centers.
First the origin of A3 , then the origin of the y-chart, then the origin of the z-chart.
On the last blowup, consider the midpoint between the origin of the y- and the
z-chart. Show that J is resolved at this point if the characteristic is zero or > 2.
Example 11.15. . What happens in the preceding example if the characteristic
is equal to 2? Describe in detail the behaviour of the first two components of the
resolution invariant under the three local blowups.
Example 11.16. . A combinatorial version of resolution is known as Hironaka’s
polyhedral game: Let N be an integral convex polyhedron in Rn+ , i.e., the positive
convex hull N = conv(S + Rn+ ) of a finite set S of points in Nn . Player A chooses a
subset J of {1, . . . , n}, then player B chooses an element j ∈ J. After these
P moves,
S is replaced by the set S 0 of points α defined by αi0 = αi if i 6= j and αj0 = k∈J αk ,
giving rise to a new polyhedron N 0 . Player A has won if after finitely many rounds
the polyhedron has become an orthant α + Rn+ . Player B can never win, but only
prevent player A from winning. Show that player A has a winning strategy, first
with and then without using induction on n [Spi83, Zei06].
12. Lecture XII: Positive Characteristic Phenomena
The existence of the resolution of varieties of arbitrary dimension over a field of
positive characteristic is still an open problem. For curves, there exist various
proofs [Kol07] chap. 1. For surfaces, the first proof of non-embedded resolution was
given by Abhyankar in his thesis [Abh56]. Later, he proved embedded resolution
for surfaces, but the proof is scattered over several papers which sum up to over
500 pages [Abh59, Abh64, Abh66b, Abh66a, Abh67, Abh98]. Cutkosky was able to
shorten and simplify the argumens substantially [Cut11]. An invariant similar to
the one used by Abhyankar was developed independently by Zeillinger and Wagner
[Zei05, Wag09, HW14]. Lipman gave an elegent proof of non-embedded resolution
for arbitrary two-dimensional schemes [Lip78, Art86]. Hironaka proposed an invariant based on the Newton polyhedron which allows to prove embedded resolution of
surfaces which are hypersurfaces [Hir84, Cos81, Hau00]. Hironaka’s invariant seems
to be restricted to work only for surfaces. The case of higher codimensional surfaces
was settled by Cossart-Jannsen-Saito, extending Hironaka’s invariant [CJS09]. Different proofs were recently proposed by Benito-Villamayor and Kawanoue-Matsuki
[BV12, KM12].
For three-folds, Abhyankar and Cossart gave partial results. Quite recently,
Cossart-Piltant proved non-embedded resolution of three-folds by a long case-bycase study [CP08, CP09, CP12, CP13]. See also [Cut09].
Programs and techniques for resolution in arbitrary dimension and characteristic have been developed quite recently, among others, by Hironaka, Teissier,
Kuhlmann, Kawanoue-Matsuki, Benito-Bravo-Villamayor, Hauser-Schicho, Cossart
[Hir12, Tei03, Kuh00, Kaw14, KM10, BV12, BV14, BV10, BV11, Hau10b, HS12,
Cos11].
Remark 12.1. Let K be an algebraically closed field of prime characteristic p >
0, and let X be an affine variety defined in An . The main problems already appear
BLOWUPS AND RESOLUTION
57
in the hypersurface case. Let f = 0 be an equation for X in An . Various properties
of singularities used in the characteristic zero proof fail in positive characteristic:
(a) The top locus of f of points of maximal order need not be contained locally
in a regular hypersurface. Take the variety in A4 defined by f = x2 +yz 3 +zw3 +y 7 w
over a field of characteristic 2 [Nar83, Mul83, Kaw14, Hau98].
(b) There exist sequences of blowups for which the sequence of points above a
given point a where the order of the strict transforms of f has remained constant are
eventually not contained in the strict transforms of any regular local hypersurface
passing through a.
(c) Derivatives cannot be used to construct hypersurfaces of maximal contact.
(d) The characteristic zero invariant is no longer upper semicontinuous when
translated to positive characteristic.
Example 12.2. A typical situation where the characteristic zero resolution
invariant does not work in positive characteristic is as follows. Take the polynomial
f = x2 + y 7 + yz 4 over a field of characteristic 2. There exists a sequence of blowups
along which the order of the strict transforms of f remains constant equal to 2 but
where eventually the order of the residual factor of the coefficient ideal of f with
respect to a hypersurface of weak maximal contact increases.
The hypersurface V of W = A3 defined by x = 0 produces – up to raising the
ideal to the square – as coefficient ideal of f the ideal on A2 generated by y 7 + yz 4 .
Its order at the origin is 5.
Blow up A3 at the origin. In the y-chart W 0 of the blowup, the total transform
of f is given by
f ∗ = y 2 (x2 + y 5 + y 3 z 4 ),
with f 0 = x2 + y 3 (y 2 + z 4 ) the strict transform of f . It has order 2 at the origin
of W 0 . The generator of the coefficient ideal of f 0 in V 0 : x = 0 decomposes into a
monomial factor y 3 and a residual factor y 2 + z 4 . The order of the residual factor
at the origin of W 0 is 2. Blow up W 0 along the z-axis, and consider the y-chart
W 00 , with strict transform
f 00 = x2 + y(y 2 + z 4 ),
of f . The residual factor of the coefficient ideal in V 00 : x = 0 equals again y 2 + z 4 .
Blow up W 00 at the origin and consider the z-chart W 000 , with strict transform
f 000 = x2 + yz(y 2 + z 2 ).
The origin of W 000 is the intersection point of the two exceptional components y = 0
and z = 0. The residual factor of the coefficient ideal in V 000 : x = 0 equals y 2 + z 2 ,
of order 2 at the origin of W 000 .
Blow up the origin of W 000 and consider the affine chart W (iv) given by the
coordinate transformation
x 7→ xz, y 7→ yz + z, and z 7→ z.
The origin of this chart is the midpoint of the new exceptional component. The
strict transform of f 000 equals
f (iv) = x2 + (y + 1)z 2 y 2 ,
which, after the coordinate change x 7→ x + yz, becomes
f (iv) = x2 + y 3 z 2 + y 2 z 2 .
58
HERWIG HAUSER
The order of the strict transforms of f has remained constant equal to 2 along the
sequence of local blowups. The order of the residual factor of the associated coefficient ideal has decreased from 5 to 2 in the first blowup, then remained constant
until the last blowup, where it increased from 2 to 3.
Remark 12.3. The preceding example shows that the order of the residual factor of the coefficient ideal of the defining ideal of a singularity with respect to a local
hypersurface of weak maximal contact is not directly suited for an induction argument as in the case of zero characteristic. For surfaces, practicable modifications
of this invariant are studied in [HW14].
Definition 12.4. A hypersurface singularity X at a point a of affine space
W = AnK over a field K of characteristic p is called purely inseparable of order pe
at a if there exist local coordinates x1 , . . . , xn on W at a such that a = 0 and such
that the local equation f of X at a is of the form
e
f = xpn + F (x1 , . . . , xn−1 )
for some e ≥ 1 and a polynomial F ∈ K[x1 , . . . , xn−1 ] of order ≥ pe at a.
Proposition 12.5. For a purely inseparable hypersurface singularity X at a,
the polynomial F is unique up to multiplication by units in the local ring OW,a and
the addition of pe -th powers in K[x1 , . . . , xn−1 ].
Proof. Multiplication by units does not change the local geometry of X at
a. A coordinate change in xn of the form xn 7→ xn + a(x1 , . . . , xn−1 ) with a ∈
e
e
K[x1 , . . . , xn−1 ] transforms f into f = xpn + a(x1 , . . . , xn−1 )p + F (x1 , . . . , xn−1 ).
This implies the assertion.
Definition 12.6. Let affine space W = An be equipped with an exceptional
normal crossings divisor E produced by earlier blowups with multiplicities r1 , . . . , rn .
Let x1 , . . . , xn be local coordinates at a point a of W such that E is defined at a
e
by xr11 · · · xrnn = 0. Let f = xpn + F (x1 , . . . , xn−1 ) define a purely inseparable
e
singularity X of order p at the origin a = 0 of An such that F factorizes into
r
n−1
F (x1 , . . . , xn−1 ) = xr11 · · · xn−1
· G(x1 , . . . , xn−1 ).
The residual order of X at a with respect to E is the maximum of the orders of the
polynomials G at a over all choices of local coordinates such that f has the above
form [Hir12, Hau10b].
Remark 12.7. The residual order can be defined for arbitrary singularities
[Hau10b]. In characteristic zero, the definition coincides with the second component
of the local resolution invariant, defined by the choice of an osculating hypersurface
or, more generally, of a hypersurface of weak maximal contact and the factorization
of the associated coefficient ideal.
Remark 12.8. In view of the preceding example, one is led to investigate the
behaviour of the residual order under blowup at points where the order of the singularity remains constant. Moh showed that it can increase at most by pe−1 [Moh87].
Abhyankar seems to have observed already this bound in the case of surfaces. He
defines a correction term ε taking values equal to 0 or pe−1 which is added to the
residual order according to the situation in order to make up for the occasional
increases of the residual order [Abh67, Cut11]. A similar construction has been
proposed by Zeillinger and Hauser-Wagner [Zei05, Wag09, HW14]. This allows, at
BLOWUPS AND RESOLUTION
59
least for surfaces, to define a secondary invariant after the order of the singularity,
the modified residual order of the coefficient ideal, which does not increase under
blowup. The problem then is to handle the case where the order of the singularity
and the modified residual order remain constant. It is not clear how to define a
third invariant which manifests the improvement of the singularity.
Remark 12.9. Following ideas of Giraud, Cossart has studied the behaviour
of the order of the Jacobian ideal of f , defined by certain partial derivatives of f .
Again, it seems that hypersurfaces of maximal contact do not exist for this invariant
[Gir75, Cos11]. There appeared promising recent approaches by Hironaka, using
the machinery of differential operators in positive characteristic, by Villamayor and
collaborators using instead of the restriction to hypersurfaces of maximal contact
projections to regular hypersurfaces via elimination algebras, and by KawanoueMatsuki using their theory of idealistic filtrations and differential closures. None
of these proposals has been able to produce an invariant or a resolution strategy
which works in positive characteristic for all dimensions.
Remark 12.10. Another approach consists in analyzing the singularities and
blowups for which the residual order increases under blowup. This leads to the
notion of kangaroo singularities:
Definition 12.11. A hypersurface singularity X defined at a point a of affine
space W = AnK over a field K of characteristic p by a polynomial equation f = 0
f , a0 ) → (W, a)
is called a kangaroo singularity if there exists a local blowup π : (W
of W along a regular center Z contained in the top locus of X and transversal to
an already existing exceptional normal crossings divisor E such that the order of
the strict transform of X remains constant at a0 but the residual order of the strict
transform of f increases at a0 . The point a0 is then called kangaroo point of X
above a.
Remark 12.12. Kangaroo singularities can be defined for arbitrary singularities. They have been characterized in all dimensions by Hauser [Hau10a, Hau10b].
However, the knowledge of the algebraic structure of these singularities did not yet
give any hint how to overcome the obstruction caused by the increase of the residual
order.
e
e
Proposition 12.13. If a polynomial f = xpn + F (x1 , . . . , xn−1 ) = xpn +
rn−1
r1
x1 · · · xn−1
· G(x1 , . . . , xn−1 ) defines a kangaroo singularity of order pe at 0 the
following conditions must hold: (a) the sum of the ri and of the order of G at 0
is divisible by pe ; (b) the sum of the residues of the exceptional multiplicities ri
modulo pe is bounded by (m − 1) · pe with m the number of exceptional multiplicities not divisible by pe ; (c) the initial form of F equals a specific homogeneous
polynomial which can be explicitly described. Any kangaroo point a0 of X above a
lies outside the strict transform of the components of the exceptional divisor at a
whose multiplicities are not a multiple of pe .
Remark 12.14. A more detailed description of kangaroo singularities and a
further discussion of typical characteristic p phenomena can be found in [Hau10a,
Hau10b].
60
HERWIG HAUSER
Examples
Example 12.15. Prove the resolution of plane curves in arbitary characteristic
by using the order and the residual order as the resolution invariants.
Example 12.16. Let K be an algebraically closed field of characteristic p >
0. Develop a significant notion of resolution for elements of the quotient of rings
K[x, y]/K[xp , y p ]. Then prove that such a resolution always exists.
Example 12.17. . Consider the polynomial f = x2 + yz 3 + zw3 + y 7 w on A4
over a ground field of characteristic 2. Its maximal order is 2, and the respective
top locus is the image of the monomial curve (t32 , t7 , t19 , t15 ), t ∈ K. The image
curve has embedding dimension 4 at 0 and cannot be embedded locally at 0 into
a regular hypersurface of A4 . Hence there is no hypersurface of maximal contact
with f locally at the origin.
Example 12.18. . Find a surface X in positive characteristic and a sequence
of point blowups starting at a ∈ X so that some of the points above a where the
order of the weak transforms of X remains constant eventually leave the transforms
of any local regular hypersurface passing through a.
Example 12.19. . Show that f = x2 + yz 3 + zw3 + y 7 w has in characteristic
2 top locus top(f ) equal to the parametrized curve (t32 , t7 , t19 , t15 ) in A4 [Nar83,
Mul83, Kaw14].
Example 12.20. . Show that f is not contained in the square of the ideal
defining the parametrized curve (t32 , t7 , t19 , t15 ).
Example 12.21. . Find the defining ideal for the image of the monomial curve
(t , t7 , t19 , t15 ) in A4 . What is the local embedding dimension at 0?
32
Example 12.22. . Show that f = x2 + yz 3 + zw3 + y 7 w admits in characteristic 2 at the point 0 no local regular hypersurface of permanent maximal contact
(i.e., whose successive strict transforms contain all points where the order of f has
remained constant in any sequence of blowups with regular centers inside the top
locus).
Example 12.23. Consider f = x2 + y 7 + yz 4 in characteristic 2. Show that
there exists a sequence of point blowups for which f admits at the point 0 no
local regular hypersurface whose transforms have weak maximal contact with the
transforms of f as long as the order of f remains equal to 2.
Example 12.24. . Define the p-th order derivative of polynomials in K[x1 , . . . , xn ]
for K a field of characteristic p.
Example 12.25. . Construct a surface of order p5 in A3 over a field of characteristic p for which the residual order increases under blowup.
Example 12.26. . Show that for the polynomial f = xp + y p z over a field of
characteristic p and taking E = ∅ the residual order of f along the (closed) points
of the z-axis is not equal to its value at the generic point.
Example 12.27. . Let y1 , . . . , ym be fixed coordinates, and consider a homogeneous polynomial G(y) = y r · g(y) with r ∈ Nm and g(y) homogeneous of degree
k. Let G+ (y) be the polynomial obtained from G by the linear coordinate change
yi → yi + ym for i = 1, . . . , m − 1. Show that the order of G+ along the ym -axis is
at most k.
BLOWUPS AND RESOLUTION
61
Example 12.28. Express the assertion of the preceding example through the
invertibility of a matrix of multinomial coefficients.
i
Pk
k−i
Example 12.29. . Consider G(y, z) = y r z s i=0 k+r
. Compute
i+r y (tz − y)
∗
+
for t ∈ K the polynomial G (y, z) = G(y + tz, z) and its order with respect to y
modulo p-th power polynomials.
Example 12.30. . Determine all homogeneous polynomials G(y, z) = y r z s g(y, z)
so that G+ (y, z) has order k + 1 with respect to y modulo p-th power polynomials.
Example 12.31. + Find a new systematic proof for the embedded resolution
of surfaces in three-space in arbitrary characteristic.
Example 12.32. Let G(x) be a polynomial in one variable over a field K
of characteristic p, of degree d and order k at 0. Let t ∈ K, and consider the
equivalence class G of G(x + t) in K[x]/K[xp ] (i.e., consider K(x + t) modulo p-th
power polynomials). What is the maximal order of G at 0? Describe all examples
where this maximum is achieved.
13. Discussion of selected examples
The comments and hints below were compiled by Stefan Perlega and Valerie
Roitner.
Ex. 1.1. Let X be defined by 27x2 y 3 z 2 +(x2 +y 3 −z 2 )3 = 0 and let Y = C×C be
the cartesian product of the cusp C defined by x3 − y 2 = 0 with itself. The surface
Y can be parametrized by (s, t) → (s3 , s2 , t3 , t2 ). Composing this map with the
projection (x, y, z, w) 7→ (x, −y + w, z) from A4 to A3 gives (s, t) 7→ (s3 , t2 − s2 , t3 ).
Substitution into the equation of X gives 0,
27s6 t6 (t2 − s2 )3 + (s6 + (t2 − s2 )3 − t6 )3 =
= 27(s6 t12 − 3s8 t10 + 3s10 t8 − s12 t6 ) + 27(s12 t6 − 3s10 t8 + 3s8 t10 − s6 t12 ) = 0.
Therefore the image of Y under the projection lies inside X. It remains to show
that every point in X is obtained in this way. The restriction Y → X of the projection A4 → A3 is a finite map (as can e.g. be checked by using a computer algebra
program), hence the image of Y is closed in X. As it has dimension two and X is
an irreducible surface, the image of Y is whole X.
√
Ex. 1.2. √Asides from the symmetries in the text, replacing x with ± −1 · x
and z with ± −1 · z gives a new symmetry.
In characteristic 2 the defining polynomial of X equals f = x2 y 3 z 3 + (x2 + y 3 +
3 3
z ) and there appears an additional symmetry which is given by interchanging x
with z.
√
Ex. 1.3. Replacing z by −1 · z gives the equation g = −27x2 y 3 z 2 + (x2 + y 3 +
z 2 )3 = 0, cf. Figure 3. Symmetries of this surface are e.g. given by replacing x by
−x or z by −z or by interchanging x with z. Also sending (x, y, z) to (t3 x, t2 y, t3 z)
with t ∈ K gives a symmetry.
The partial derivatives of g give the equations for Sing(X),
x · (−9y 3 z 2 + (x2 + y 3 + z 2 )3 ) = 0,
y 2 · (−9x2 z 2 + (x2 + y 3 + z 2 )3 ) = 0,
62
HERWIG HAUSER
z · (−9y 3 x2 + (x2 + y 3 + z 2 )3 ) = 0.
Therefore the singular locus of X has six components, given by the equations
x = y = z = 0,
x = y 3 + z 2 = 0,
z = x2 + y 3 = 0,
y = x2 + z 2 = 0,
z − x = y 3 − z 2 = 0,
z + x = y 3 − z 2 = 0.
Figure 3: The surface of equation 27x2 y 3 z 2 = (x2 + y 3 + z 2 )3 .
Ex. 1.4. The point a = (0, 1, 1) lies in the component S of Sing(X) defined by
g = x − y 3 + z 2 = 0. Since (∂x g(a), ∂y g(a), ∂z g(a)) = (1, 3, 2), the component S is
regular at a. The curve given by the parametrization (0, t2 , t3 ) lies in S and passes
through a for t = 1. Its tangent vector at t = 1 is (0, 2, 3), which is a normal vector
to the plane P . Therefore P intersects S transversally at a.
The intersection X ∩ P is given by the equations y = 21 (5 − 3z) and h(x, z) =
f (x, 21 (5 − 3z), z) = 27x2 z 2 18 (5 − 3z)3 + (x2 + 81 (5 − 3z)3 − z 2 )3 = 0. Computing the
points where ∂x h = 0 and ∂z h = 0 gives (among others) the solution x = 0, z = 1,
whence y = 1. Therefore X ∩ P has a singularity at (0, 1, 1). The Taylor expansion
of h at (x, z) = (0, 1) is given by
2197 3
135w
−
w + O(w4 ) + 27 −
+ 93w2 + O(w3 ) x2 + O(x4 ),
8
2
where w = z − 1.
e of X in the origin of A3 is defined in X × P2 by the
Ex. 1.6. The blowup X
equations
xu2 − yu1 = xu3 − zu1 = yu3 − zu2 = 0,
e →X
where (u1 : u2 : u3 ) are projective coordinates on P2 . The blowup map π : X
2
e
is the restriction to X of the projection X × P → X.
The equation of the x-chart of the blowup of X is obtained by replacing (x, y, z)
with (x, xy, xz) in the equation defining X and by factoring the appropriate power
of the polynomial x defining the exceptional divisor. This gives the equation
Cx : 27x7 y 3 z 2 + (x2 + x3 y 3 − x2 z 2 ) = x6 · (27xy 3 z 2 + (1 + xy 3 − z 2 )3 ) = 0,
BLOWUPS AND RESOLUTION
63
e in the x-chart is defined by 27xy 3 z 2 + (1 + xy 3 − z 2 )3 = 0
so that the patch of X
3
in A . See Figure 4. Similarly, the y- and the z-chart are obtained by replacing
(x, y, z) with (xy, y, yz) and (xz, yz, z) respectively and give the equations
Cy : y 6 · (27x2 yz 2 + (x2 + y − z 2 )3 ) = 0
and
Cz : z 6 · (27x2 y 3 z + (x2 + y 3 z − 1)3 ) = 0.
The blowup Ye of Y = C × C in the origin of A4 is defined in Y × P3 by
xu2 − yu1 = xu3 − zu1 = xu4 − wu1 = yu3 − zu2 = yu4 − wu2 = zu4 − wu3 = 0.
The x-chart of Ye is obtained by replacing (x, y, z, w) with (x, xy, xz, xw) in the
equations defining Y and by then factoring the appropriate powers of x. It is
hence given in A4 by the equations 1 − xy 3 = z 2 − xw3 = 0. The other charts
are obtained similarly: in the y-chart, x2 − y = z 2 − yw3 = 0; in the z-chart,
x2 − y 3 z = 1 − zw3 = 0; in the w-chart, x2 − y 3 w = z 2 − w = 0.
Figure 4: Chart expressions of the blowup of the surface Camelia.
bX,a and m
bX,a every regular system of
Ex. 2.34. Since OX,a ⊆ O
b X,a = mX,a · O
bX,a . But there
parameters x1 , . . . , xn of OX,a is also a generator system of m
b X,a in O
exists a subset S of {x1 , . . . , xn } such that S is a regular system of parameters of
bX,a . The converse does not hold, since in general a regular system of parameters
O
bX,a need not belong to OX,a .
of O
Ex. 2.38. The image of f : (x, y) 7→ (xy, y) is f (A2 ) = (A2 \ (A1 × {0})) ∪
{(0, 0)}. This is a constructible and dense subset of A2 . The inverse f −1 : (x, y) 7→
64
HERWIG HAUSER
( xy , y) of f is defined on the complement of the x-axis. It cannot be extended to
the origin 0 of A2 , since f contracts the x-axis of A2 onto 0.
Ex. 2.40. It is easily checked that the inverse of ϕij is ϕji :
xk
k 6= i, j,
xj · xj = xk ,
1
k = i,
[ϕji ◦ ϕij (x1 , . . . , xn )]k = xj · xi xj = xi ,
1
=
x
,
k = j,
j
1/xj
where [−]k denotes the k-th component. Therefore ϕji ◦ ϕij is the identity. The
domain Uij of ϕij is An \ V (xj ), a dense open subset of An . The image ϕij (Uij )
equals An \ V (xi ). It is open, too. Since all components of ϕij are rational and the
denominators do not vanish on Uij , the maps ϕij induce biregular maps Uij → Uji .
Ex. 2.41. Elliptic curves admit an additive group structure. It therefore
suffices to restrict to the origin a = 0 ∈ A2 and to show that the curve is forb 1 , 0). But K[[x, y]]/(y 2 − x3 + x) ' K[[y]] since, by
mally isomorphic at 0 to (A
the implicit function theorem for formal power series, the residue class of x in
K[[x, y]]/(y 2 − x3 + x) can be expressed as a series in y. To show that X is nowhere
locally biregular to the affine line is much harder.
Ex. 2.42. A morphism f : X → Y of algebraic varieties is proper if it is separated and universally closed, i.e., if for any variety Z and any morphism h : Z → Y
the induced morphism g : X ×Y Z → Y, g(x, z) = f (x) = h(z) is closed. In the
example, already the image π(X) = A1 \ {0} of X is not closed.
b 0) and (Yb , 0) would send the
Ex. 2.43. A formal isomorphism between (X,
the jacobian ideals generated by the partial derivatives of x3 − y 2 and x5 − y 2 to
each other. This
√is impossible. On the other hand, the formal isomorphism defined
b 0) onto (Z,
b 0). It is an isomorphism by the
by (x, y) 7→ (x 3 1 + x2 , y) sends (X,
inverse function theorem for formal power series.
√
Ex. 3.27. The maximal ideal of K[[x]] is generated by x. Since 1 + x is a
√
P
unit in K[[x]] (its inverse is (1 + x)−1/2 = k≥0 −1/2
(−1)k xk ), also x · 1 + x
k
√
generates this ideal. Therefore x· 1 + x is a regular system of parameters
in K[[x]].
√
It does not stem from a regular parameter system in K[x](x) since 1 + x cannot
be written as a quotient of polynomials.
Ex. 3.28. The maximal ideal of the local ring OA2 ,0 = K[x, y](x,y) is generated
by x and y. As x2 + 1 is invertible in K[x, y](x,y) , also y 2 − x3 − x = y 2 − x(x2 + 1)
and y generate this ideal. They hence form a regular system of parameters of OA2 ,0 .
For the remaining assertions, see ex. 2.41.
Ex. 3.31. Computing the derivatives of x2 − y 2 z with respect to x, y and
z and setting them zero shows that the singular locus of X is the z-axis. Let
bX,a =
a = (0, 0, t) with t 6= 0 be a point√of the z-axis outside the origin. Then O
2
2
C[[x, y, z]]/(x − y (z − t)). Since z − t is for √
t 6= 0 a formal√power series in z the
quotient can be rewritten as C[[x, y, z]]/(x − y z − t)(x + y z − t). The product
BLOWUPS AND RESOLUTION
65
√
√
(x−y z − t)(x+y z − t) = 0 defines two smooth formal surfaces intersecting each
other transversally.
√ They are√formally isomorphic to the union of the two planes
defined by (x − y −t)(x + y −t) = 0. Hence a is a normal crossings point of X.
But it is not a simple normal crossings point since, globally, X consists of only one
component which is moreover singular at a.
bX,0 = K[[x, y, z]]/(x2 −y 2 z). Since x2 −y 2 z is
The formal neighborhood of 0 is O
irreducible in K[[x, y, z]] and X is singular at 0 the origin is not a normal crossings
point of X.
Ex. 3.34. Over C or any finite field Fq with q congruent to 1 modulo
√ 4 there
2
2
−1y)(x −
exists
a
square
root
of
−1,
hence
the
variety
defined
by
x
+
y
=
(x
+
√
−1y) = 0 has normal crossings at the origin. Since both components are regular
at 0 it also has simple normal crossings.
The surface defined by x2 + y 2 + z 2 = 0 does not have normal crossings
over R or C, but it has normal crossings over a field of characteristic 2, since
x2 + y 2 + z 2 = (x + y + z)2 in characteristic 2 so that the variety is a double plane.
The same holds for the variety defined by x2 + y 2 + z 2 + w2 = 0. The variety
xy(x − y) = 0 has three components passing through 0, but as A2 has only two
coordinate subspaces the variety does not have normal crossings at 0. The same
argument works for xy(x2 − y) = 0. The variety defined by (x − y)z(z − x) = 0 has
both normal and simple normal crossings at the origin over any field.
Ex. 3.35. The visualization of the surface looks as follows, cf. figure 5.
Figure 5: The zeroset of (x − y 2 )(x − z)z = 0 in A3 .
Ex. 3.38. A point a is a regular point of a variety if the local ring is regular, i.e.,
if its maximal ideal can be generated by as many elements as the Krull dimension
indicates. For a cartesian product X × Y , the local ring at a point (a, b) is the
tensor product of the local rings of the two factors,
OX×Y,(a,b) = K[X × Y ]m(a,b) ' K[X]ma ⊗ K[Y ]mb = OX,a ⊗ OY,b
and the same holds for the respective maximal ideals,
m(a,b) /m2(a,b) ' ma /m2a ⊗ mb /m2b .
66
HERWIG HAUSER
Therefore (a, b) ∈ X × Y is regular if and only if a is regular in X and b is regular
in Y . Consequently, Sing(X × Y ) = (Sing(X) × Y ) ∪ (X × Sing(Y )).
Ex. 3.39. A rather simple example for such a variety is the surface Tülle
defined by xz(x + z − y 2 ) = 0 in A3 . The pairwise intersections of its three components are the y-axis, respectively the two parabolas defined by x = z − y 2 = 0
and z = x − y 2 = 0, and are therefore regular. The parabolas are tangent to the
y-axis at 0. Said differently, the intersection of all three components, which is settheoretically just the origin 0 ∈ A3 , is scheme-theoretically singular (i.e., the sum
of the three ideals (x), (z) and (x + z − y 2 ) is not the ideal (x, y, z) defining the
origin in A3 ). Because of this, the surface is not mikado at 0.
Ex. 4.25. For X = V (xy, x2 ) and a the origin, the local ring is OX,a =
K[x, y]/(xy, x2 )(x,y) ' K[x, y](x,y) /(xy, x2 ). As a scheme, X equals the y-axis together with an embedded point at 0, since (xy, x2 ) has the primary decomposition
(xy, x2 ) = (x) ∩ (x2 , y). As Z = {0} cannot be defined in X by a single equation,
it is not a Cartier divisor.
Ex. 4.26. The local ring OX,a of X = A1 at the origin is OX,a = K[x](x) . The
monomial x2 is not a zero-divisor in OX,a , hence Z = V (x2 ) is a Cartier divisor
in A1 . Similarly, x2 y is not a zero divisor in OA2 ,a = K[x, y](x−a1 ,y−a2 ) for any
a = (a1 , a2 ) ∈ A2 and Z = V (x2 y) is a Cartier divisor in A2 .
Ex. 4.27. As Z = V (x2 , y) is defined in X = V (x2 , xy) by y = 0 where the
residue class y of y in OX,0 = K[x, y](x,y) /(x2 , xy) is a zero divisor, it follows that
Z is not a Cartier divisor in X.
Ex. 4.38. The Rees algebra of the ideal I = (x, 2y) in Z20 [x, y] is given by
M
M
e=
R
I k tk =
(xt, 2yt)k = Z20 [x, y, xt, 2yt]
k≥0
k≥0
with deg t = 1. It is isomorphic to Z20 [u, v, w, z]/(uz − 2vw) with deg u = deg v = 0
and deg w = deg z = 1.
Ex. 4.46. The blowup of A2 in Z = {(0, 1)} is given by the closure Γ of the
graph of γ : A2 \ {(0, 1)} → P1 , (a, b) 7→ (a : b − 1) in A2 × P1 together with the
projection π : Γ → X, (a, b, (c : d)) 7→ (a, b). More explicitly,
Γ = {(a, b, (a : b − 1)), (a, b) ∈ A2 } ∪ {(0, 1)} × P1 .
The line L in A2 defined by x + y = 0 does not contain the point (0, 1), therefore
its preimage in Γ is π −1 (L) = {((a, −a), (a : −a − 1)), a ∈ A1 }.
The line L0 in A2 defined by x + y = 1 contains the point (0, 1), therefore its
preimage in Γ is π −1 (L0 ) = {(a, 1 − a, (a : −a)), a ∈ A1 \ {0}} ∪ {(0, 1)} × P1 .
Ex. 4.47. The chart expressions of the blowup map of A3 along the z-axis
are given by π1 (x, y, z) = (x, xy, z) and π2 (x, y, z) = (xy, y, z). Their inverses are
π1−1 (x, y, z) = (x, xy , z) and π2−1 (x, y, z) = ( xy , y, z). The chart transition maps are
BLOWUPS AND RESOLUTION
67
given by the compositions
π1−1
◦ π2 (x, y, z) =
1
xy, , z
x
and
π2−1
◦ π1 (x, y, z) =
1
, xy, z .
y
Ex. 4.48. Let the chosen line Z in the cone X be defined by x = y − z = 0.
It requires two equations, therefore it is not a Cartier divisor. The polynomials x
and y − z form a regular sequence in K[X] = K[x, y, z]/(x2 + y 2 − z 2 ). Therefore
e of X along Z is given in X × P1 by the equation xv − (y − z)u =
the blowup X
where (u : v) are projective coordinates in P1 .
An alternate way to compute the blowup is by applying first the linear coordinate change u = x, w = y + z and t = y − z. The equation x2 + y 2 = z 2 of X
transforms into Y : u2 + 2wt = 0 and x = y − z = 0 becomes u = t = 0. The
latter equations define the w-axis, which is now the center of blowup. The resulting chart expressions of the blowup map are given by π1 (u, w, t) = (ut, w, t) and
π2 (u, w, t) = (u, w, wt). This gives the chart descriptions of the total transform Y ∗
of Y via
Y1∗ = V (u2 t2 + 2wt) = V (t) ∪ V (u2 t + 2w),
Y2∗ = V (u2 + 2uwt) = V (u) ∪ V (u + 2wt),
respectively. Substituting backwards gives
X1∗ = V (y − z) ∪ V (x2 (y − z) + 2(y + z)),
X2∗ = V (x) ∪ V (x + 2(y 2 − z 2 )),
where the second components denote the chart expressions of the strict transform
e 3 of A3 along Z, i.e., of the blowup X
e of X along Z, cf.
X s of X in the blowup A
def. 6.2 as well as Prop. 5.1 together with its corollary.
Ex. 4.49. The polynomials z and x2 +(y +2)2 −1 defining the circle in A3 form
a regular sequence. Hence, if (u : v) denote projective coordinates in P1 , the blowup
e of X along the circle is given in X ×P1 by the equation uz−v(x2 +(y+2)2 −1) = 0
X
e → X on the first factor.
together with the projection π : X
The polynomials z and y 2 − x3 − x defining the elliptic curve in A3 form a regular
e of X along this curve is given in X × P1 by the
sequence, too. The blowup X
2
3
e → X on the
equation uz − v(y − x − x) = 0 together with the projection π : X
first factor.
Ex. 4.52. The ideals I = (x1 , . . . , xn ) and J = (x1 , . . . , xn )m = I m induce
e = ⊕k≥0 I k and Se = ⊕k≥0 J k = ⊕k≥0 I mk , hence define
isomorphic Rees algebras R
n
the same blowups of A . See [Moo01] for more details on the characterization of
ideals producing the same blowup.
68
HERWIG HAUSER
Ex. 4.57. Since the centers of the blowups are given by coordinate subspaces,
the definition of blowup via affine charts can be used. For the blowup in the
origin the three chart expressions of the blowup map are given by πx (x, y, z) =
(x, xy, xz), πy (x, y, z) = (xy, y, yz) and πz (x, y, z) = (xz, yz, z). This gives for the
total transforms of X the expressions
Xx∗ = V (x2 − x3 y 2 z) = V (x2 ) ∪ V (1 − xy 2 z),
Xy∗ = V (x2 y 2 − y 3 z) = V (y 2 ) ∪ V (x2 − yz),
Xz∗ = V (x2 y 2 − y 2 z 3 ) = V (z 2 ) ∪ V (1 − xy 2 z).
e of X is given by gluing the three charts V (1 − xy 2 z), V (x2 − yz),
The blowup X
and V (1 − xy 2 z) of the strict transform X s of X according to def. 4.12. Observe
that the origin of the y-chart V (x2 − yz) has the same singularity as X at 0.
The blowup of X along the x-axis yields for the blowup map the chart expressions πy (x, y, z) = (x, y, yz) and πz (x, y, z) = (x, yz, z). As the x-axis is not
e of X
contained in X, the total transform X ∗ and the strict transform X s = X
e
coincide, cf. def. 6.2. This gives for X the chart expressions
ey = V (x2 − y 3 z),
X
ez = V (x2 − y 2 z 3 ).
X
For the blowup of X along the y-axis, the total transform has chart expressions
Xx∗ = V (x) ∪ V (x − y 2 z),
Xz∗ = V (z) ∪ V (x2 z − y 2 ),
where the secondly listed components are the charts of the strict transform. Again,
the chart V (x2 z − y 2 ) has, up to permutation of the variables, the same singularity
as X at 0. The blowup of X along the z-axis gives accordingly
Xx∗ = V (x2 ) ∪ V (1 − y 2 z),
Xy∗ = V (y 2 ) ∪ V (x2 − z).
Ex. 4.64. The blowup of X = Spec(Z[x]) along I = (x, p) is covered by two
charts with coordinate rings Z[x, x/p] ' Z[x, u]/(x − pu) ' Z[u] and Z[x, p/x] '
Z[x, u]/(p − xu), respectively. Observe that the second chart is not equal to the
affine line A1Z over Z, see also [EH00].
For the blowup of X along I = (px, pq) one cannot use the equations of def.
4.10 since px and pq do not form a regular sequence in Z[x]. Similarly as before,
the affine charts have coordinate rings Z[x, x/q] ' Z[x, u]/(x − qu) ' Z[u] and
Z[x, q/x] ' Z[x, u]/(q − xu), respectively.
Ex. 5.12. The equations g1 = y 2 − xz, g2 = yz − x3 and g3 = z 2 − x2 y
do not form a regular sequence, since they admit the non-trivial linear relations
z · g1 − y · g2 + x · g3 = 0 and x2 · g1 − z · g2 + y · g3 = 0. Therefore one cannot use
the equations of def. 4.10 to describe the blowup of A3 along the curve Z defined
by g1 = g2 = g3 = 0.
Ex. 5.13. Consider the map γ : X \ Z → P1 , (x, y, z) 7→ (x : y). For x = y = 0
and z 6= 0 there lies only one point in the closure Γ of the graph of γ in X × P1 ,
while for z = 0 the set of limit points forms a projective line P1 . The blowup is a
local isomorphism outside 0 since Z is locally a Cartier divisor in X at these points
BLOWUPS AND RESOLUTION
69
(being locally a regular curve in a regular surface). Above 0 ∈ X the blowup map
e → X is not a local isomorphism, since π contracts all limit points to 0, or,
π:X
e is regular, while X is singular at 0.
alternatively, because the blowup X
e 2 → A2 with center the origin has the chart exEx. 5.14. The blowup map π : A
pressions (x, y) 7→ (x, xy) and (x, y) 7→ (xy, y). The total transform X ∗ = π −1 (X)
e 2 has therefore charts defined in A2 by x2 = 0, respectively
of X = V (x2 ) in A
2 2
x y = 0, with exceptional divisors given by x = 0 and y = 0. Hence the strict
e of X lies only in the y-chart and is defined there by x2 = 0.
transform X s = X
Ex. 5.15. The same computation as in the preceding example applies and
e lies entirely in the y chart. It is defined there by the ideal (x2 , x) =
shows that X
(x), equals hence the y-axis of this chart.
Ex. 5.17. The blowup of A3 along the union of two coordinate axes is discussed
in ex. 4.36 and 4.66.
e 3 of A3 along the cusp (x3 − y 2 , z) is defined in A3 × P1 by
The blowup A
3
2
uz − v(x − y ) = 0, since x3 − y 2 and z form a regular sequence. It follows that
e 3 is singular at 0.
A
Ex. 6.14. By Prop. 6.6, the defining ideal of the strict transform of X is
generated by the strict transforms of the elements of a Macaulay basis of the ideal
(x2 − y 3 , xy − z 3 ). Notice that the given generators are not a Macaulay basis
since their initial forms are x2 and xy, which do not generate the initial form of
y(x2 − y 3 ) − x(xy − z 3 ) = xz 3 − y 4 . By adding this element, the Macaulay basis
x2 − y 3 , xy − z 3 , xz 3 − y 4 is obtained.
The chart expressions of the strict transform of X can now be computed from
this Macaulay basis,
Xxs = V (1 − xy 3 , y − xz 3 , z 3 − y 4 ),
Xys = V (x2 − y, x − yz 3 , xz 3 − 1),
Xzs = V (x2 − y 3 z, xy − z, x − y 4 ).
Ex. 6.18 and 6.19. The transformation of flags under blowups is explicitly
described in [Hau04] p. 5–8.
Ex. 6.22. In the y-chart, the total transform of I = (x2 , y 3 ) is given by the
ideal I ∗ = (x2 y 2 , y 3 ). Factoring out the maximal power of the monomial defining
the exceptional divisor, I ∗ = (y 2 )(x2 , y) is obtained. Thus, the weak transform of
I is given by the ideal I g = (x2 , y). On the other hand, it is easy to see that x2 , y 3
is a Macaulay basis for I. Thus, by Prop. 6.6, the strict transform of I is generated
by the strict transforms of these generators. Therefore, I s = (x2 , 1) = K[x, y].
Ex. 6.23. This result is proved in [Hau03], p. 345.
Ex. 7.10. For the first two equations, the implicit function theorem shows
that the zerosets are regular at 0. This gives a parametrization by formal power
70
HERWIG HAUSER
series. The zeroset of the third equation is singular at 0 and one cannot use the
implicit function theorem to describe it at 0. To give a parametrization requires to
construct first a resolution, which, in the present case, is very tedious.
Ex. 7.14. Consider the case that the resolution of Y is achieved by a sequence
of blowups:
πn−1
πn−2
π0
Y0 = Y.
Y 0 = Yn −→ Yn−1 −→ · · · −→
Denote by Zi ⊆ Yi the center of the blowup πi : Yi+1 → Yi . Since Z is regular, the
singular locus of Y × Z is Sing(Y ) × Z. By the base change property for blowups,
Prop. 5.1, the blowup of Yi × Z along the center Zi × Z equals Yi+1 × Z. This gives
a new sequence
π
en−1
π
en−2
π
e
0
Y0 × Z = Y × Z
Y 0 × Z = Yn × Z −→ Yn−1 × Z −→ · · · −→
where π
ei : Yi+1 × Z → Yi × Z is the blowup along the center Zi × Z ⊆ Yi × Z. It
is checked that the morphism Y 0 × Z → Y × Z is a resolution of the singularities
of Y × Z.
Ex. 8.25. Consider the variety X = V ((x2 − y 3 )(z 2 − w3 )) ⊆ A4 over a field
of characteristic zero. The stratification of X by the iterated singular loci is as
follows.
Sing(X) = V (x, y) ∪ V (z, w) ∪ V (x2 − y 3 , z 2 − w3 ),
Sing2 (X) = V (x, y, z 2 − w3 ) ∪ V (z, w, x2 − y 3 ),
Sing3 (X) = V (x, y, z, w).
Ex. 8.30–8.32. Let J ⊆ R be an ideal and I ⊆ R a prime ideal. The order of
J along I is defined as
ordI J = max{k ∈ N, JRI ⊆ I k RI }
where RI is the localization of R in I. If I (k) = I k RI ∩ R denotes the k-th symbolic
power of I, the order can also be expressed as
ordI J = max{k ∈ N, J ⊆ I (k) }
without making explicit use of the localization [ZS75].
Now consider the example R = K[x, y, z], I = (y 2 − xz, yz − x3 , z 2 − x2 y). It
can be checked that I is a prime ideal of R but not a complete intersection (i.e.,
not generated by a regular sequence, cf. ex. 5.12). Also consider the principal ideal
J in R that is generated by f = x5 + xy 3 + z 3 − 3x2 yz. The order of J along I can
be determined as follows. First notice that f ∈
/ I 2 since f has order 3 at the origin,
2
but all elements in I have at least order 4 at the origin. On the other hand,
xf = x6 + x2 y 3 + xz 3 − 3x3 yz = (x3 − yz)2 − (y 2 − xz)(z 2 − x2 y) ∈ I 2 .
Since x ∈
/ I, this implies that J · RI ⊆ I 2 RI , and in particular, ordI J ≥ 2. Thus,
f is an example for an element in R that is contained in the symbolic power I (2) ,
but not in I 2 . It remains to show that ordI J = 2. By Thm. 8.20 it suffices to
find a point a that lies on the curve V (I) for which orda f = 2. Such a point is for
instance a = (1, 1, 1) ∈ V (I).
Pc−1
Ex. 8.39. Consider the polynomial g = xc + i=0 gi (y) · xi at the origin
a = 0 of A1+n . The order of g at a equals the minimum of c and all values
BLOWUPS AND RESOLUTION
71
orda gi + i, for 0 ≤ i < c. Assume that ord0 g = c and also that gc−1 = 0. If
the characteristic of the ground field is zero, this can be achieved by a change of
coordinates x 7→ x + 1c · gc−1 (y), compare with rem. 9.4 and ex. 9.10. The defining
i+|α|
∂
ideal I of the top locus of V (g) is generated by the derivatives ∂x
i ∂y α g where i ∈ N,
n
α ∈ N and i + |α| < c. In particular, if the characteristic of the ground field is
∂ c−1
zero, ∂x
c−1 g = c! · x ∈ I and thus x ∈ I. This allows to express I in the form:
∂ |α|
n
I = x, α gi (y), for α ∈ N , i < c, |α| < c − i .
∂y
P
Ex. 8.43. Assume that ord g = d and g = i,j cij y i z j . The order will always
be taken at the origin of the respective charts. Let g 0 be the strict transform of g
under the first blowup. Then
X
g0 =
cij y i+j−d z j .
i,j
Set d0 = ord g 0 and notice that d0 = min{i + 2j − d, cij 6= 0}. Let g 00 be the strict
transform of g 0 under the second blowup. Then
X
0
g 00 =
cij y i+j−d z i+2j−d−d .
i,j
Set d00 = ord g 00 and notice that d00 = min{2i + 3j − 2d − d0 , cij 6= 0}. It is clear
that d00 ≤ d0 ≤ d. If d0 ≤ d2 , then d00 ≤ d2 follows. So assume that d0 > d2 . By
assumption, there exists a pair (i, j) ∈ N2 such that i + j = d and cij 6= 0. Thus,
d
d
d00 ≤ 2i + 3j −2d −d0 < j − ≤ .
|{z} |{z} 2
| {z }
2
=2d+j
<− d
2
≤d
Ex. 8.53. The situation is described in detail in [Hau00], Prop. 4.5, p. 354,
and [Zar44], Thm. 1 and Lemma 3.2, p. 479. If the center is a smooth curve, see
[Hau00], Prop. 4.6, p. 354, and [Zar44], Thm. 2, p. 484 and its corollary, p. 485.
bW,a ' K[[x1 , . . . , xn ]]. Assume
Ex. 9.8. Let a = 0 and pass to the completionP
O
that P
orda f = c and that f has the expansion f = α∈Nn cα xα . The initial form of
f is |α|=c cα xα . It is assumed that the blowup is monomial; thus, a0 is the origin
of the xi -chart for some i ≤ n. If i > 1, then a0 is contained in the strict transform
of V s . It remains to show that, if a0 is the origin of the x1 -chart, the order of the
strict transform of f is smaller than c .
For this, notice that the strict transform of f at the origin of the x1 -chart is
P
|α|−c−α1 α
given by f 0 = α∈Nn cα x1
x where α1 is the first component of α. The
monomials of this expansion are distinct, so there can be no cancellation between
them. By assumption, x1 appears in the initial form of f ; thus, there is an exponent
α0 ∈ Nn such that |α0 | = c, α10 > 0 and cα0 6= 0. This implies that the expansion of
−α0
f 0 contains the non-zero monomial cα0 x1 1 xα . Therefore orda0 f 0 < c = orda f .
72
HERWIG HAUSER
Ex. 9.10. Assume that the characteristic of the ground field is zero. The
coordinate change xn 7→ xn − d1 · ad−1 (y) transforms f into
d X
i
d−1
1
1
f 7→ xn − · ad−1 (y) +
ai (y) xn − · ad−1 (y) .
d
d
i=0
Notice thatthe coefficient of xdn in this new expansion is 1 and the coefficient of
xd−1
is − d1 d1 ad−1 (y) + ad−1 (y) = 0. Thus, there are polynomials e
ai (y) such that,
n
in the new coordinates,
d−2
X
f = xdn +
e
ai (y)xin .
i=0
∂ d−1
(f )
∂xd−1
n
= d! · xn . Thus, the variety defined by xn = 0 defines an
Consequently,
osculating hypersurface for X at the origin. By Prop. 9.5, every osculating hypersurface has maximal contact.
Ex. 9.11. The defining equation for the strict transform of X in the x-chart
is given by
f 0 = y + y 2 − z + y 2 z − z 2 − yz 2 = ((y + 1) − (z + 1))(y + 1)(z + 1).
The order of f 0 at the point a0 = (0, −1, −1) is 3. Since the exceptional divisor is
given by the equation x = 0 in the x-chart, a0 lies on it. The strict transform V s
of V coincides with the complement of the x-chart, so a0 cannot lie on V s .
Ex. 9.14. The relevant case appearsPwhen c = p > 0 where p is the characteristic of the ground field. Let g(y) = α∈Nm gα y α be the expansion of g with
respect to the coordinates y1 , . . . , ym . It decomposes into
X
X
g(y) =
gα y α +
gα y α .
α∈p·Nm
|
α∈Nm \p·Nm
{z
g1 (y)
}
{z
|
g2 (y)
}
If the ground field is assumed to be perfect, g1 (y) is a p-th power. Thus, there is
a formal power series ge(y) with ord ge ≥ 1 such that gep = g1 . Apply the change of
coordinates x 7→ x − ge. This transforms f into
f = (x − ge)p + g1 + g2 = xp − gep + g1 + g2 = xp + g2 .
Notice that ord g2 ≥ ord g. To show that this order is maximal, it suffices to
consider an arbitrary change of coordinates z 7→ z + h(y) where h ∈ K[[y1 , . . . , ym ]]
is any power series with ord h ≥ 1. This transforms the equation into
f = xp + hp + g2 .
Notice that there can be no cancellation between the terms in the expansions of hp
and g2 . Thus, ord(hp + g2 ) ≤ ord g2 .
Ex. 9.17. Denote the sequence of local blowups by
πm−1
π
0
(W 0 , a0 ) = (Wm , am ) −→ · · · −→
(W0 , a0 ) = (W, a).
Set f (0) = f and let f (i) be the strict transform of f after i blowups. Assume that
the center of each local blowup πi : (Wi+1 , ai+1 ) → (Wi , ai ) is contained in the top
BLOWUPS AND RESOLUTION
73
locus of f (i) and has normal crossings with the exceptional divisors produced by
previous blowups. Let Z be a local hypersurface of maximal contact for f at a.
Assume that ordai f (i) = orda f for i = 1, . . . , m. Then, by definition of maximal
contact, ai ∈ Zi for i = 0, . . . , m, where Zi denotes the strict transform of Z after
i blowups. Since all centers are contained in the top locus of f (i) , they are also
contained in Zi . By repeatedly applying Prop. 5.3, the union of all exceptional
divisors produced by the blowups πm−1 , . . . , π0 with Z 0 = Zm is a normal crossings
divisor. Thus, a0 is contained in n + 1 hypersurfaces that form a normal crossings
divisor. But this is impossible in an ambient space of dimension n.
Ex. 10.20. Set f = x5 + x2 y 4 + y k . Denote by Vx and Vy the regular local
hypersurfaces defined by x = 0, respectively y = 0. If k ≥ 5, then the order of f at
the origin is 5 and the derivative ∂x4 f = 5! · x defines the hypersurface Vx . Thus,
Vx is osculating. If k = 4, then the order of f at the origin is 4. The derivative
∂y3 f = 4! · y(1 + x2 ) defines a regular parameter. Since 1 + x2 is a unit in the local
ring OA2 ,0 , the hypersurface Vy is osculating. If k < 4, taking the differential with
respect to y shows again that Vy is an osculating hypersurface.
If k ≥ 5, then JVx (I) = (y 160 , y 24k ) and JVy (I) = (x240 , x120 ) = (x120 ).
Thus, both Vx and Vy have weak maximal contact if k = 5, while only Vx has
k!
weak maximal contact if k > 5. If 2 ≤ k ≤ 4, then JVx (I) = (y 4 k−2 , y k! ) and
JVy (I) = (x5(k−1)! ). Since k! < 5(k − 1)!, only Vy has weak maximal contact in this
case.
Ex. 10.21. Assume that the characteristic of the ground field is not equal to
2. Then ∂x f = 2x and the hypersurface V has weak maximal contact with f by
Prop. 10.11. The coefficient ideal JV (f ) of f with respect to V is generated by
y 3 z 3 + y 7 + z 7 and has order 6 (up to raising the generator to the required power).
Restrict to the case of the blowup of A2 at the origin and the study of f
at the origin of the y-chart. The strict transform of f is given there by f 0 =
x2 + y 4 (z 3 + y + yz 7 ). The points where the order of f 0 has remained constant are
exactly the points of the z-axis. Let V 0 denote the strict transform of V . Then
JV 0 (f 0 ) is generated by y 4 (z 3 + y + yz 7 ) where y 4 is the exceptional factor (again,
up to taking powers). The order of the residual factor has dropped to 1 at the
origin and to 0 at all other points of the z-axis.
Ex. 10.22. Assume that a = 0, orda f = c and that JV (f ) = (y α ) where
n−1
y = (x
. Now let L ⊆ {1, . . . , n − 1} be a subset such
P1 , . . . , xn−1 ) and αP∈ N
that
α
≥
c!
but
i∈L i
i∈L\{j} αi < c! for all j ∈ L. This is possible since
orda JV (f ) = |α| ≥ c! by the definition of coefficient ideals.
Blow up An in the center given by xn = 0 and xi = 0 for all i ∈ L. Let a0 be a
point over a at which the order of the strict transform of f has remained constant.
Since V is osculating, a0 is not contained in the xn -chart. So let j ∈ L be such that
a0 is contained in the xj -chart. The transform of the coefficient ideal in this chart
is
P
αi −c! α
JV 0 (f 0 ) = JV (f )! = (xj i∈L\{j}
y ).
P
0
0
0
But since
i∈L\{j} αi − c! < 0 by assumption, it follows that orda JV (f ) <
orda JV (f ). But the order of the coefficient ideal is at least c! as long as the order
of the strict transform of f remains equal to c. Thus, by iterating this procedure,
74
HERWIG HAUSER
after finitely many steps the order of the strict transform of f has to drop.
Ex. 10.27. Assume that ord I = c. Let x1 , . . . , xn be a regular system of
bAn ,0 = K[[x1 , . . . , xn ]]. Define a map π : Nn → N ∪ {∞} in the
parameters for O
following way:
(
Pn−1
c!
αi if αn < c,
π(α1 , . . . , αn ) = c−αn i=1
∞
if αn ≥ c.
Let V be the regular
local hypersurface defined by xn = 0. Elements f ∈ I have
P
expansions f = α∈Nn cf,α xα . Then, by the definition of coefficient ideals,
ord(JV (I)) = min{π(α), α ∈ Nn : there is an f ∈ I such that cf,α 6= 0}.
Now define a monomial order <ε on K[x1 , . . . , xn ] in the following way: Set xα <ε
xβ if and only if π(α) < π(β) or π(α) = π(β) and α <lex β where <lex denotes the
lexicographic order on Nn .
By [Hau04], Thm. 3, p. 10, there exists a regular system of parameters x1 , . . . , xn
bAn ,0 such that the initial ideal of I with respect to <ε is maximal (again, with
for O
bAn ,0 . In parrespect to <ε ) over all choices of regular systems of parameters for O
ticular, let y1 , . . . , yn be another
regular system of parameters and let each f ∈ I
P
0
α
have the expansion f =
with respect to these parameters. Then
α∈Nn cf,α y
n
there exist elements g ∈ I and α
e ∈ N such that c0g,e
α 6= 0 and
π(e
α) ≤ min{π(α), α ∈ Nn , there is an f ∈ I such that cf,α 6= 0}.
Let V 0 be the regular local hypersurface defined by yn = 0. Then the last statement
implies that ord(JV 0 (I)) ≤ ord(JV (I)). Thus, the regular system of parameters
x1 , . . . , xn maximizes the order of the coefficient ideal.
Ex. 10.30. Let I be an ideal with orda I = orda0 I g where a0 is the origin of
the xj -chart for some j < P
n and I g denotes the weak transform of I. Elements
f ∈ I have expansions f = i≥0 fi (y)xin where y = (x1 , . . . , xn−1 ). Then
o!
JV (I) = (fio−i , i < o, f ∈ I).
The weak transform of I is given by I g = (f g , f ∈ I) where
X
X
−o
∗
∗ i i
i
f g = x−o
f
=
x
f
x
x
=
(fi∗ xi−o
i
n
j
j
j
j ) xn .
{z
}
|
i≥0
i≥0
=:fi0
Here, f ∗ and fi∗ denote the total transforms. Thus, the coefficient ideal of I g with
respect to the strict transform V 0 of V is
0
o!
o!
o!
(i−o) o−i
JV 0 (I g ) = (fi o−i : i < o, f ∈ I) = (fi∗ o−i xj
∗
x−o!
j (fi
o!
o−i
: i < o, f ∈ I)
∗
!
: i < o, f ∈ I) = x−o!
j (JV (I)) = JV (I)
where JV (I)! denotes the controlled transform with control o!.
Ex. 11.14 and 11.15. These examples are discussed in detail in Lecture XII.
Ex. 12.17–12.22. Let K be a field of characteristic 2. Consider the ring
homomorphism φ : K[x, y, z, w] → K[t] given by φ(x) = t32 , φ(y) = t7 , φ(z) = t19 ,
BLOWUPS AND RESOLUTION
75
φ(w) = t15 . Let I ⊆ K[x, y, z, w] be its kernel. Its zeroset is an irreducible curve C
in A4 .
Now let f be the polynomial f = x2 + yz 3 + zw3 + y 7 w. The partial derivatives
of f have the form:
∂
f = 0,
∂x
∂
f = z 3 + y 6 w,
∂y
∂
f = yz 2 + w3 ,
∂z
∂
f = zw2 + y 7 .
∂w
It is easy to check that f and all of its first derivatives are contained in I. Thus,
by the Jacobian criterion, ordI f ≥ 2. Since the order of f in the origin is 2, it is
possible to conclude that ordI f = 2. In other words, the top locus of f contains the
curve C that is parametrized by t 7→ (t32 , t7 , t19 , t15 ). It can be checked, e.g. via
any computer algebra system, that the top locus of f is itself an irreducible curve.
Thus, it coincides with the curve C.
Now suppose that there is a regular local hypersurface at the origin that contains the top locus of f and hence the curve C. This hypersurface has an equation
h = 0 in which at least one variable must appear linearly. But since h ∈ I, this
is only possible if one of the numbers 32, 7, 19, 15 can be written as an N-linear
combination of the others. This is not the case so that there is no regular local
hypersurface containing the top locus of f .
Let V be any regular local hypersurface at the origin. Since it does not contain
the curve C, there is a sequence of point blowups that separates the strict transforms of V and C. Since the variety X defined by f = 0 has order 2 along the curve
C and the point blowups are isomorphisms over all but one point of C, the order
of the strict transform of X under these blowups will again be 2 along the strict
transform of C. So there eventually is a point a0 at which the strict transform of
X has order 2, but which is not contained in the strict transform of V . Thus, V
does not have maximal contact with X. Since V was chosen arbitrarily, there can
be no hypersurface that has maximal contact with X.
Ex. 12.24. Let α ∈ Nn . Define the
differential operator ∂xα on K[x1 , . . . , xn ]
β−α
β
as the linear extension of ∂xα xβ = α
x
.
In particular, consider the differential operator ∂xpi for i ∈ {1, . . . , n}. If n ∈ N
P
has the p-adic expansion n = i≥0 ni pi with 0 ≤ ni < p, then ∂xpi xni = np xn−p
=
i
k
for any k ∈ N.
n1 xn−p
. Similarly, ∂xpk xni = nk xn−p
i
i
i
Notice that ∂xpi is not a derivation since it does not fulfill the Leibniz rule:
∂xpi (xpi ) = 1, but
xi ∂xpi xip−1 +xip−1 ∂xpi xi = 0.
| {z }
| {z }
0
0
For more details on differential operators in positive characteristic, see [Kaw07]
Chap. 1, pp. 838–851.
76
HERWIG HAUSER
5
4
4
4
4
Ex. 12.25. Consider f = z 3 + x4·3 y 3 (x3 + y 3 + x300 ) as a polynomial over
a field of characteristic 3. Assume that the exceptional locus is given locally by
V (xy). Then its residual order with respect to the local hypersurface defined by
z = 0 is 34 . Now consider the blowup of A2 at the origin and let a0 be the point
(0, 1, 0) in the x-chart. The strict transform of f has the equation
5
5
4
4
5
5
4
4
f 0 = z 3 + x3 (y 3 + 1)(y 3 − 1 + x219 ) = z 3 + x3 (y 2·3 − 1 + x219 (1 + y 3 )).
By making the change of coordinates z 7→ z + x, this transforms into
5
5
4
4
f 0 = z 3 + x3 (y 2·3 + x219 (1 + y 3 )).
The exceptional divisor is given locally by V (x). Thus, the residual order of f 0 with
respect to the hypersurface defined by z = 0 is 2 · 34 > 34 .
Ex. 12.26. The equation of f in local coordinates x, y, z at a point (0, 0, t)
on the z-axis is obtained by making a translation z 7→ z + t. Thus, the equation
xp + y p (z + t) = xp + y p z + y p t is obtained. Assume that the ground field is perfect
and let λ be the p-th root of t. Then one can write xp + y p z + y p t = (x + λy)p + y p z.
Thus, the residual order of f at every point of the z-axis is p + 1.
Now consider the generic point P = (x, y) of the z-axis. The order of the coefficient ideal along P is p.
Ex. 12.27. Observe that
G+ (y) =
m−1
Y
rm +
g (y).
(yi + ym )ri ym
i=1
Let I denote the ideal (y1 , . . . , ym−1 ). Notice that I defines a complete intersection.
By [Hoc73] 2.1, p. 57, [Pel88], Prop. 1.8, p. 359, the order of a polynomial f along
I can be expressed as the largest power of I that contains f . In particular, it fulfills
that ordI (f · g) = ordI f + ordI g for polynomials f, g. Now compution yields
ordI G+ (y) =
m−1
X
i=1
ri · ordI (yi + ym ) +rm · ordI ym +ordI g + (y)
| {z }
{z
}
|
0
0
+
≤ ord g (y) = ord g(y) = k.
Ex. 12.29 and 12.30. This is explained in detail in [Hau10a].
References
[Abh56]
[Abh59]
[Abh64]
[Abh66a]
[Abh66b]
[Abh67]
S. Abhyankar, Local uniformization on algebraic surfaces over ground fields of characteristic p 6= 0, Ann. of Math. (2) 63 (1956), 491–526.
, Ramification theoretic methods in algebraic geometry, Annals of Mathematics Studies, no. 43, Princeton University Press, 1959.
, Uniformization in p-cyclic extensions of algebraic surfaces over ground
fields of characteristic p, Math. Ann. 153 (1964), 81–96.
, An algorithm on polynomials in one indeterminate with coefficients in a
two dimensional regular local domain, Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (4) 71 (1966), 25–59.
, Uniformization in a p-cyclic extension of a two dimensional regular local
domain of residue field characteristic p, Festschr. Gedächtnisfeier K. Weierstrass,
Westdeutscher Verlag, 1966, pp. 243–317.
, Nonsplitting of valuations in extensions of two dimensional regular local
domains, Math. Ann. 170 (1967), 87–144.
BLOWUPS AND RESOLUTION
[Abh88]
[Abh98]
77
, Good points of a hypersurface, Adv. in Math. 68 (1988), no. 2, 87–256.
, Resolution of singularities of embedded algebraic surfaces, second ed.,
Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, 1998.
[AM69]
M. Atiyah and I. MacDonald, Introduction to commutative algebra, Addison-Wesley
Pub. Co, 1969.
[AM73]
S. Abhyankar and T.-T. Moh, Newton-Puiseux expansion and generalized Tschirnhausen transformation. I, II, J. Reine Angew. Math. 260 (1973), 47–83; ibid. 261
(1973), 29–54.
[Art86]
M. Artin, Lipman’s proof of resolution of singularities for surfaces, Arithmetic geometry (Storrs, Conn., 1984), Springer, 1986, pp. 267–287.
[AZ55]
S. Abhyankar and O. Zariski, Splitting of valuations in extensions of local domains,
Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 41 (1955), 84–90.
[BDMVP12] E. Bierstone, S. Da Silva, P. Milman, and F. Vera-Pacheco, Desingularization by
blowings-up avoiding simple normal crossings, 2012, arXiv:1206.5316.
[Ben70]
B. Bennett, On the characteristic functions of a local ring, Ann. of Math. (2) 91
(1970), 25–87.
[BHSV08]
G. Bodnár, H. Hauser, J. Schicho, and O. Villamayor, Plain varieties, Bull. London
Math. Soc. 40 (2008), 965–971.
[BM97]
E. Bierstone and P. Milman, Canonical desingularization in characteristic zero by
blowing up the maximum strata of a local invariant, Invent. Math. 128 (1997), no. 2,
207–302.
[BM06]
, Desingularization of toric and binomial varieties, J. Algebraic Geom. 15
(2006), no. 3, 443–486.
, Functoriality in resolution of singularities, Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. 44
[BM08]
(2008), no. 2, 609–639.
[Bod03]
G. Bodnár, Computation of blowing up centers, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 179 (2003),
no. 3, 221–233.
[Bod04]
, Algorithmic tests for the normal crossing property, Automated deduction
in geometry, Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci., vol. 2930, Springer, 2004, pp. 1–20.
[BV10]
A. Bravo and O. Villamayor, Singularities in positive characteristic, stratification
and simplification of the singular locus, Adv. Math. 224 (2010), no. 4, 1349–1418.
, Elimination algebras and inductive arguments in resolution of singularities,
[BV11]
Asian J. Math. 15 (2011), no. 3, 321–355.
[BV12]
A. Benito and O. Villamayor, Techniques for the study of singularities with applications to resolution of 2-dimensional schemes, Math. Ann. 353 (2012), no. 3,
1037–1068.
, Monoidal transformations and invariants of singularities in positive char[BV14]
acteristic, Comp. Math. (2014).
[CJS09]
V. Cossart, U. Jannsen, and S. Saito, Canonical embedded and non-embedded resolution of singularities for excellent two-dimensional schemes, 2009, arXiv:0905.2191.
[Cos75]
V. Cossart, Sur le polyèdre caractéristique d’une singularité, Bull. Soc. Math. France
103 (1975), no. 1, 13–19.
, Desingularization of embedded excellent surfaces, Tôhoku Math. J. (2) 33
[Cos81]
(1981), no. 1, 25–33.
[Cos11]
, Is there a notion of weak maximal contact in characteristic p > 0?, Asian
J. Math. 15 (2011), no. 3, 357–369.
[CP08]
V. Cossart and O. Piltant, Resolution of singularities of threefolds in positive characteristic. I. Reduction to local uniformization on Artin-Schreier and purely inseparable coverings, J. Algebra 320 (2008), no. 3, 1051–1082.
[CP09]
, Resolution of singularities of threefolds in positive characteristic. II, J.
Algebra 321 (2009), no. 7, 1836–1976.
[CP12]
, Resolution of singularities of threefolds in mixed characteristic: case of
small multiplicity, 2012, hal-00735929.
[CP13]
, Resolution of singularities of arithmetical threefolds I, 2013, hal-00873967.
[Cut04]
S. D. Cutkosky, Resolution of singularities, American Mathematical Society, 2004.
[Cut09]
, Resolution of singularities for 3-folds in positive characteristic, Amer. J.
Math. 131 (2009), no. 1, 59–127.
78
[Cut11]
[dJP00]
[EH00]
[EH02]
[Eph78]
[EV98]
[EV00]
[Fab11]
[Fab12]
[FH10]
[FW11]
[GH78]
[Gir75]
[Gro61]
[GW10]
[Har77]
[Hau98]
[Hau00]
[Hau03]
[Hau04]
[Hau10a]
[Hau10b]
[Hir64]
[Hir84]
[Hir03]
[Hir12]
[HM89]
[HM90]
HERWIG HAUSER
, A skeleton key to Abhyankar’s proof of embedded resolution of characteristic
p surfaces, Asian. J. Math. 15 (2011), no. 3, 369–416.
T. de Jong and G. Pfister, Local analytic geometry: basic theory and applications,
Vieweg, 2000.
D. Eisenbud and J. Harris, The geometry of schemes, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 197, Springer-Verlag, 2000.
S. Encinas and H. Hauser, Strong resolution of singularities in characteristic zero,
Comment. Math. Helv. 77 (2002), no. 4, 821–845.
R. Ephraim, Isosingular loci and the Cartesian product structure of complex analytic
singularities, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 241 (1978), 357–371.
S. Encinas and O. Villamayor, Good points and constructive resolution of singularities, Acta Math. 181 (1998), no. 1, 109–158.
, A course on constructive desingularization and equivariance, Resolution of
singularities (Obergurgl, 1997), Progr. Math., vol. 181, Birkhäuser, 2000, pp. 147–
227.
E. Faber, Normal crossings in local analytic geometry, Ph.D. thesis, Universität
Wien, 2011.
, Characterizing normal crossing hypersurfaces, 2012, arXiv:1206.5316.
E. Faber and H. Hauser, Today’s menu: geometry and resolution of singular algebraic surfaces, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 47 (2010), 373–417.
E. Faber and D. Westra, Blowups in tame monomial ideals, J. Pure Appl. Algebra
215 (2011), no. 8, 1805–1821.
P. Griffiths and J. Harris, Principles of algebraic geometry, Wiley, 1978.
J. Giraud, Contact maximal en caractéristique positive, Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup.
(4) 8 (1975), no. 2, 201–234.
A. Grothendieck, Éléments de géométrie algébrique. II. Étude globale élémentaire
de quelques classes de morphismes, Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math. (1961),
no. 8, 222.
U. Görtz and T. Wedhorn, Algebraic geometry I, Advanced Lectures in Mathematics,
Vieweg + Teubner, Wiesbaden, 2010.
R. Hartshorne, Algebraic geometry, Springer-Verlag, 1977.
H. Hauser, Seventeen obstacles for resolution of singularities, Singularities (Oberwolfach, 1996), Progr. Math., vol. 162, Birkhäuser, 1998, pp. 289–313.
, Excellent surfaces and their taut resolution, Resolution of singularities
(Obergurgl, 1997), Progr. Math., vol. 181, Birkhäuser, 2000, pp. 341–373.
, The Hironaka theorem on resolution of singularities (or: A proof we always
wanted to understand), Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 40 (2003), no. 3, 323–403.
, Three power series techniques, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 89 (2004),
no. 1, 1–24.
, On the problem of resolution of singularities in positive characteristic (or:
a proof we are still waiting for), Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 47 (2010), no. 1,
1–30.
, Wild Singularities and Kangaroo Points for the Resolution in Positive
Characteristic, 2010, Manuscript.
H. Hironaka, Resolution of singularities of an algebraic variety over a field of characteristic zero. I, II, Ann. of Math. (2) 79 (1964), 109–203; ibid. (2) 79 (1964),
205–326.
, Desingularization of excellent surfaces, Bowdoin 1967, Resolution of surface singularities, V. Cossart, J. Giraud, and U. Orbanz, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1101, Springer-Verlag, 1984.
, Theory of infinitely near singular points, J. Korean Math. Soc. 40 (2003),
no. 5, 901–920.
, Resolution of singularities, Manuscript distributed at the CMI Summer
School 2012, 138 pp.
H. Hauser and G. Müller, The trivial locus of an analytic map germ, Ann. Inst.
Fourier 39 (1989), no. 4, 831–844.
, The cancellation property for direct products of analytic space germs, Math.
Ann. 286 (1990), no. 1-3, 209–223.
BLOWUPS AND RESOLUTION
[Hoc73]
[HS12]
[HW14]
[Kaw07]
[Kaw14]
[Kem11]
[KM10]
[KM12]
[Kol07]
[Kuh00]
[Lev01]
[Lip75]
[Lip78]
[Liu02]
[Mat89]
[Moh87]
[Moo01]
[Mul83]
[Mum99]
[Nag75]
[Nar83]
[Obe00]
[Pan06]
[Pel88]
[Ser00]
[Sha94]
[Spi83]
[Sza94]
[Tei03]
[Tem08]
79
M. Hochster, Criteria for equality of ordinary and symbolic powers of primes, Math.
Z. 133 (1973), 53–65.
H. Hauser and J. Schicho, A game for the resolution of singularities, Proc. Lond.
Math. Soc. (3) 105 (2012), no. 6, 1149–1182.
H. Hauser and D. Wagner, Two alternative invariants for the embedded resolution
of surface singularities in positive characteristic, Enseign. Math. (2014).
H. Kawanoue, Toward resolution of singularities over a field of positive characteristic. I. Foundation; the language of the idealistic filtration, Publ. Res. Inst. Math.
Sci. 43 (2007), no. 3, 819–909.
, Idealistic filtration program with the radical saturation, this volume (2014).
G. Kemper, A course in commutative algebra, Springer, 2011.
H. Kawanoue and K. Matsuki, Toward resolution of singularities over a field of
positive characteristic (the idealistic filtration program) Part II. Basic invariants
associated to the idealistic filtration and their properties, Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci.
46 (2010), no. 2, 359–422.
, Resolution of singularities of an idealistic filtration in dimension 3 after
Benito-Villamayor, 2012, arXiv:1205.4556.
J. Kollár, Lectures on resolution of singularities, Princeton University Press, 2007.
F.-V. Kuhlmann, Valuation theoretic and model theoretic aspects of local uniformization, Resolution of singularities (Obergurgl, 1997), Progr. Math., vol. 181,
Birkhäuser, 2000, pp. 381–456.
M. Levine, Blowing up monomial ideals, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 160 (2001), no. 1,
67–103.
J. Lipman, Introduction to resolution of singularities, Algebraic geometry, Arcata
1974. Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Vol. 29, Amer. Math. Soc., 1975, pp. 187–230.
, Desingularization of two-dimensional schemes, Ann. Math. (2) 107 (1978),
no. 1, 151–207.
Q. Liu, Algebraic geometry and arithmetic curves, Oxford University Press, 2002.
H. Matsumura, Commutative ring theory, Cambridge University Press, 1989.
T.-T. Moh, On a stability theorem for local uniformization in characteristic p, Publ.
Res. Inst. Math. Sci. 23 (1987), no. 6, 965–973.
J. Moody, Divisibility of ideals and blowing up, Illinois J. Math. 45 (2001), no. 1,
163–165.
S. B. Mulay, Equimultiplicity and hyperplanarity, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 89 (1983),
no. 3, 407–413.
D. Mumford, The red book of varieties and schemes, Springer, 1999.
M. Nagata, Local rings, R.E. Krieger Pub. Co, 1975.
R. Narasimhan, Hyperplanarity of the equimultiple locus, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.
87 (1983), no. 3, 403–408.
Resolution of singularities. A research textbook in tribute to Oscar Zariski (Obergurgl
1997), Progress in Mathematics, vol. 181, Birkhäuser Verlag, 2000, Edited by H.
Hauser, J. Lipman, F. Oort and A. Quirós.
D. Panazzolo, Resolution of singularities of real-analytic vector fields in dimension
three, Acta Math. 197 (2006), no. 2, 167–289.
R. Pellikaan, Finite determinacy of functions with nonisolated singularities, Proc.
London Math. Soc. (3) 57 (1988), no. 2, 357–382.
J.-P. Serre, Local algebra, Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag,
2000.
I. Shafarevich, Basic algebraic geometry, Springer-Verlag, 1994.
M. Spivakovsky, A solution to Hironaka’s polyhedra game, Arithmetic and geometry,
Vol. II, Progr. Math., vol. 36, Birkhäuser Boston, 1983, pp. 419–432.
E. Szabó, Divisorial log terminal singularities, J. Math. Sci. Univ. Tokyo 1 (1994),
no. 3, 631–639.
B. Teissier, Valuations, deformations, and toric geometry, Valuation theory and its
applications, Vol. II (Saskatoon, SK, 1999), Fields Inst. Commun., vol. 33, Amer.
Math. Soc., 2003, pp. 361–459.
M. Temkin, Desingularization of quasi-excellent schemes in characteristic zero, Adv.
Math. 219 (2008), no. 2, 488–522.
80
[Vil89]
[Vil07]
[Wag09]
[Wlo05]
[Zar40]
[Zar44]
[Zar47]
[Zei05]
[Zei06]
[ZS75]
HERWIG HAUSER
O. Villamayor, Constructiveness of Hironaka’s resolution, Ann. Sci. École Norm.
Sup. (4) 22 (1989), no. 1, 1–32.
, Hypersurface singularities in positive characteristic, Adv. Math. 213
(2007), no. 2, 687–733.
D. Wagner, Studies in resolution of singularities in positive characteristic, Ph.D.
thesis, Universität Wien, 2009.
J. Wlodarczyk, Simple Hironaka resolution in characteristic zero, J. Amer. Math.
Soc. 18 (2005), no. 4, 779–822.
O. Zariski, Local uniformization on algebraic varieties, Ann. of Math. (2) 41 (1940),
852–896.
, Reduction of the singularities of algebraic three dimensional varieties, Ann.
of Math. (2) 45 (1944), 472–542.
, The concept of a simple point of an abstract algebraic variety, Trans. Amer.
Math. Soc. 62 (1947), 1–52.
D. Zeillinger, Polyederspiele und Auflösen von Singularitäten, Ph.D. thesis, Universität Innsbruck, 2005.
, A short solution to Hironaka’s polyhedra game, Enseign. Math. (2) 52
(2006), no. 1-2, 143–158.
O. Zariski and P. Samuel, Commutative algebra, Springer-Verlag, 1975.
Fakultät für Mathematik,
University of Vienna, and
Institut für Mathematik,
University of Innsbruck,
Austria
[email protected]
| 0math.AC
|
A Family of Iterative Gauss-Newton Shooting Methods for Nonlinear
Optimal Control
arXiv:1711.11006v2 [cs.SY] 11 Dec 2017
Markus Giftthaler1 , Michael Neunert1 , Markus Stäuble1 , Jonas Buchli1 and Moritz Diehl2
Abstract— This paper introduces a family of iterative algorithms for unconstrained nonlinear optimal control. We
generalize the well-known iLQR algorithm to different multipleshooting variants, combining advantages like straight-forward
initialization and a closed-loop forward integration. All algorithms have similar computational complexity, i.e. linear
complexity in the time horizon, and can be derived in the same
computational framework. We compare the full-step variants
of our algorithms and present several simulation examples,
including a high-dimensional underactuated robot subject to
contact switches. Simulation results show that our multipleshooting algorithms can achieve faster convergence, better local
contraction rates and much shorter runtimes than classical
iLQR, which makes them a superior choice for nonlinear model
predictive control applications.
Index Terms— Numerical Optimal Control, Trajectory Optimization, Multiple Shooting, Quadrupedal Robots, Nonlinear
Model Predictive Control, Differential Dynamic Programming
I. I NTRODUCTION
A. Overview and Motivation
In this paper, we discuss a family of iterative Gauss-Newton
shooting methods for numerically solving unconstrained
optimal control problems, and illustrate the effectiveness
of our algorithms with various robotics examples. We outline
the connection between a number of ‘direct’ optimal control
methods and Gauss-Newton methods from the class of
Differential Dynamic Programming (DDP) [1] algorithms.
Additionally, we present a natural extension arising from this
connection and introduce a family of hybrid Gauss-Newton
Multiple Shooting methods.
In direct approaches to optimal control, infinite-dimensional
optimal control problems are transcribed into finite dimensional Nonlinear Programs (NLPs). Two prominent ways of
transcription by ‘shooting’ are direct single shooting (SS) and
direct multiple shooting (MS) [2], which differ in the choice of
decision variables. In single shooting, solely the control inputs
are the decision variables. Generally speaking, the control
trajectory is discretized in a piece-wise polynomial fashion
(for simplicity, we focus on piece-wise constant controls
in this paper, c.f. Fig. 1a). A corresponding state trajectory
is obtained by means of numerical forward integration of
the system dynamics, starting at a given initial state. SS is
often called a ‘sequential’ approach. In multiple shooting,
the same discretization scheme is employed for the control
inputs, but additionally, intermediate states are added to the
1 Agile & Dexterous Robotics Lab, ETH Zürich, Switzerland. {mgiftthaler,
neunertm, markusta, buchlij}@ethz.ch
2 Systems Control and Optimization Laboratory, Department of Microsystems Engineering (IMTEK), University of Freiburg, Germany.
[email protected]
decision variables. This provides several advantages [3], but
requires the introduction of additional matching constraints
to ensure continuity of the state trajectory. The technique
of introducing these additional degrees of freedom into the
original problem, combined with adding matching constraints,
is called lifting [4], and results in a ‘simultaneous’ method.
The formulation of both SS and MS as standard NLPs
is straightforward and any state-of-the-art NLP solvers
can be used to solve them. It is important to note that
under the assumption of having a piece-wise polynomial
control parameterization, the intrinsic sparsity structure of
the underlying optimal control problem of both SS and MS
allow them to achieve linear time complexity by performing
a Riccati recursion [5].
Classical single shooting often does not perform well
for unstable systems due to the pure open-loop forward
integration of the system dynamics. In DDP, this is handled by
doing a closed-loop forward integration, using a feedforward
plus a time-varying state-feedback control law. The Riccati
backward sweep designs time-varying feedback gains on
the fly without additional computational cost. DDP is an
exact-Hessian method, requiring the computation of second
derivatives of the dynamics. While this gives the algorithm
quadratic convergence, this can be impractical for use in
systems with complex dynamics. For that reason, Hessianapproximating variants of DDP have become quite popular
in the robotics community [6]–[10].
An important Hessian-approximating variant of DDP is the
iterative Linear-Quadratic Regulator (iLQR) [11], which
is also known as Sequential Linear Quadratic Optimal
Control [12]. This method can be classified as closed-loop
single shooting using a Gauss-Newton Hessian approximation
and a Riccati backward sweep to solve linear-quadratic (LQ)
subproblems. The Gauss-Newton Hessian approximation is
based on the assumption that the objective function can be
locally approximated as a sum of quadratic terms, and requires
only first-order derivatives of the system dynamics. This
comes at the cost of giving only linear convergence, however.
The Gauss-Newton approach can be lifted, too, which has for
example been shown in [13]. While it initially appears to be
a drawback to increase the number of decision variables, it is
important to emphasize that the lifted problem can be solved
at approximately the same computational cost as the original
non-lifted problem, and can lead to a significant increase of
convergence speed [4]. Therefore, the fundamental motivation
for this paper is to combine the benefits of iLQR with a
multiple-shooting approach.
u
x
xn
xn+1
(a) Control Inputs
F(xn, un)
dn
(c) Rollouts of GNMS
un ,xn
x
x
Consider the following discrete-time, finite-horizon, nonlinear optimal control problem
(
)
N
−1
X
min Φ(xN ) +
Ln (xn , un , n)
(1)
n=0
xn+1 − fn (xn , un , n) = 0,
s.t.
n n+1
(b) Rollout Single Shooting
n n+1
(d) Rollouts of GNMS(M)
Fig. 1.
Intuition about different shooting variants. (a) A zero-order
hold control parameterization, with a constant control input at each stage.
(b) Single shooting, where the state trajectory is obtained through a
single forward integration over the whole problem horizon. (c) In GNMS,
intermediate states at every time-index n are introduced as additional decision
variables. (d) In hybrid versions of GNMS, the multiple-shooting intervals
span several control intervals. The intermediate states at the beginning of the
multiple-shooting intervals are decision variables, and the states in between
are obtained by forward integration.
B. Contribution
In this work, we derive a lifted equivalent of iLQR, called
Gauss-Newton Multiple Shooting (GNMS), which introduces
the intermediate states as additional decision variables. Next,
we extend this relationship to form an entire family of
open-loop multiple-shooting algorithms, denoted GNMS(M ),
and closed-loop multiple shooting algorithms, denoted as
iLQR-GNMS(M ). The latter is shown to be a generalization
of iLQR and can be considered multiple-shooting iLQR.
We outline the relationship between these algorithms and
existing methods. We give simulation examples including a
complex underactuated robot and compare the performance
of the full-step algorithms using data gained from hardware
experiments. Furthermore, we show the benefits of iLQRGNMS(M ) methods for nonlinear model predictive control.
C. Outline
This paper is structured as follows. In Section II, we
derive GNMS, and present the basic update routine for
state and control trajectories. Using these update equations,
we generalize iLQR and GNMS to a family of algorithms
in Section III. Section IV showcases several simulation
results, based on data gained from hardware experiments.
A discussion and outlook concludes the paper in Section V.
II. G AUSS -N EWTON M ULTIPLE S HOOTING
In the following, a brief derivation of the unconstrained
Gauss-Newton Multiple Shooting method is presented. We
show the derivation using an intuitive value-function approach
in the style of [11] in order to highlight the close relationship
between GNMS and iLQR. However, from the beginning,
we lift the optimization problem and introduce intermediate
states as additional decision variables besides the controls. In
that sense, having each control decision variable accompanied
with a state-decision variable, GNMS is closely related to
the original multiple-shooting algorithm [2].
x0 = xinit
(2)
with state-vector xn ∈ Rm and control input vector un ∈ Rp .
Let Ln be the intermediate cost at time-step n and Φ(xN )
the terminal cost at the time horizon N .
A. Forming LQ subproblems
The optimal control law is computed in an iterative
way. In each iteration k = 0, 1, 2, . . ., we construct a
LQ optimal control problem around the state trajectory
[k]
[k]
[k]
[k]
X[k] = {x0 , x1 , . . . , xN }, with x0 = xinit and the
[k]
[k]
[k]
[k]
control trajectory U = {u0 , u1 , . . . , uN −1 }. In the first
iteration, k = 0, the LQ problem is hence constructed
around the initial guesses for X[0] , U[0] . Possible initialization
strategies are summarized in Section III-D.
At each iteration, we numerically forward integrate all
multiple shooting intervals using the respective control inputs
[k]
[k]
un , starting at every state xn ∀n = 0, 1, . . . , N − 1. Fig. 1c
shows a sketch of the multiple-shooting intervals in GNMS,
where the resulting state at the end of each interval is denoted
[k]
[k]
F[k] (xn , un ). Accordingly, we define the ‘defect’ between
the integrated trajectory segment and the next intermediate
[k]
state xn+1 as
[k]
[k] [k]
[k]
d[k]
n = F (xn , un ) − xn+1 .
[k]
(3)
[k]
Defining state and control increments δxn and δun for
every single time-stage n, we can write the nonlinear system
dynamics constraint (2) in terms of the simulated interval as
[k]
[k]
[k]
[k]
xn+1 + δxn+1 − F[k] (xn[k] + δx[k]
n , un + δun ) = 0 (4)
which can also be considered a matching condition which
ensures the continuity of the state trajectory w.r.t. state and
control increments. Performing a first-order Taylor expansion
[k]
[k]
of Equation (4) w.r.t. δxn and δun , denoting the sensitivities
w.r.t state and control An and Bn and taking into account the
defects as defined by Equation (3), results in the following
affine system dynamics constraint
[k]
[k]
[k]
[k]
[k]
δxn+1 − A[k]
n δxn − Bn δun − dn = 0 .
(5)
Analogously performing a second-order Taylor expansion
of the nonlinear cost function (1) gives rise to the following
LQ optimal control problem
>
1
min
qN + δx>
N qN + 2 δxN QN δxN
δun ,δxn
+
N
−1
X
>
>
1
qn + δx>
n qn + δun rn + 2 δxn Qn δxn
n=0
+
s.t.
>
1
2 δun Rn δun
+
δu>
n Pn δxn
(6)
δxn+1 = An δxn + Bn δun + dn
(7)
x0 = xinit
(8)
where we assume Qn , QN ≥ 0 and Rn > 0. Here, and in
the following subsection, we drop the superscript indices [k]
for better readability.
Considering the LQ subproblem (6)-(8), the optimal control
and state updates can be computed using a value-function
approach. Assume a quadratic value function of the form
(9)
with weighting matrices Sn ∈ Rm×m , sn ∈ Rm×1 and
sn ∈ R. The optimal control update can be derived by
minimizing the value function Vn as a function of δxn .
As Equation (9) is quadratic in δxn+1 at time n + 1, it
remains quadratic during back-propagation in time, given
the affine system dynamics and the linear-quadratic cost in
Equations (6)-(8). Due to Bellman’s Principle of Optimality,
the optimal control δu∗n at time n can be computed from
∗
Vn (δxn ) = min qn + δx> (qn + 12 Qn δxn ) + δu>
n Pn δxn
δun
>
∗
1
+ δun (rn + 2 Rn δun ) + Vn+1 (An δxn + Bn δun + dn )
Inserting Equation (9) and the affine system dynamics (7)
and minimizing the overall expression w.r.t. δun leads to an
optimal control update of the form
−1
δu∗n = −H−1
n hn − Hn Gn δxn
(10)
where we have defined
hn = rn + B>
n (sn+1 + Sn+1 dn )
Gn = Pn + B>
n Sn+1 An
Hn = Rn + B>
n Sn+1 Bn
and B>
n Sn+1 Bn + Rn > 0. After equating coefficients with
a quadratic value function ansatz (9) for δxn , we define
−1
ln = −H−1
n hn and Ln = −Hn Gn and obtain the following
recursive Riccati difference equations for Sn , sn and sn
>
Sn = Qn + A>
n Sn+1 An − Ln Hn Ln
sn =
sn =
q n + A>
n (sn+1 + Sn+1 dn )
>
+ Gn ln + L>
n (hn + Hn ln )
1 >
qn + sn+1 + d>
n sn+1 + 2 dn Sn+1 dn
1
+ l>
n (hn + 2 Hn ln )
[k]
[k] [k+1]
u[k+1]
= u[k]
− x[k]
n
n + ln + Ln (xn
n )
[k+1]
xn+1
B. Computing the Optimal Control by Riccati Recursion
>
1
Vn (δxn ) = sn + δx>
n sn + 2 δxn Sn δxn
equations for a forward sweep resulting in a full-step update
for the control and state decision variables X[k+1] , U[k+1]
(11)
(12)
(13)
for n ∈ 0, . . . , N − 1. For the final time-step N we obtain
the terminal conditions SN = QN , sN = qN and sN = qN ,
and the recursion is subsequently swept backwards. Note that
Equation (13) does not contribute to the control update and
can therefore be omitted in practice.
C. Updating State and Control Trajectories
Finally, using Equations (7) and (10), and readopting the
superscript indices [k] for the iteration count, we obtain
[k]
[k] [k]
[k+1]
= xn+1 + (A[k]
n + Bn Ln )(xn
[k]
[k]
+ B[k]
n ln + dn
(14)
−
x[k]
n )
(15)
[k+1]
with initial condition x0
= xinit . The updated decision
variables are dynamically consistent w.r.t. the LQ subproblem dynamics. The nonlinear optimal control problem is
solved iteratively, starting from Section II-A and solving LQ
subproblems at each iteration, until convergence.
III. A FAMILY OF I LQR-GNMS A LGORITHMS
Equations (14) and (15) present the GNMS update rule
where all states and controls (except for xinit ) are decision
variables. For every time-step, both states and controls
are updated using a linear forward sweep. Considering
Equations (14) and (15), we can now draw connections
between GNMS and other existing algorithms and extend
them to a bigger family of ‘hybrid’ variants.
A. Connection to iLQR and Single Shooting
Interestingly, full-step iLQR employs the very same control
update rule as in Equation (14). In fact, GNMS can be
transcribed into iLQR by substituting the state update equation (15) with a numeric forward integration of the nonlinear
system (2) using the time-varying state-feedback control
law provided by Equation (14). In this case, the forward
integration naturally results in a dynamically consistent state
trajectory, all defects dn become zero and the formulation
from section II-B drops back to the well-known iLQR Riccati
recursion. Moreover, standard unconstrained single shooting
can be recovered by additionally ignoring the state feedback
gains and running the forward-integration purely open-loop.
B. Hybrid Algorithms
Consider a case where the overall time horizon N is
split into an integer number of multiple shooting intervals
M with length l and 1 < M < N , while the control input
discretization is kept at its original resolution. Without loss
of generality, let us assume that the MS integration intervals
start at time indices i ∈ I, with I = {0, l, 2l, . . .}. Fig. 1d
sketches an example of such a hybrid case with l = 3. Every
interval is simulated using the nonlinear system dynamics (2)
[k]
[k]
[k]
and the initial states and controls xi and ui . All xj with
j∈
/ I are overwritten by the integration. For an open-loop
forward integration, U[k] remains as is, but for a closed-loop
[k]
forward integration, we additionally overwrite all uj with
j∈
/ I using the given feedback control law. Note that in this
case, the defect equation (3) remains valid, but is zero along
the multiple-shooting intervals. The only non-zero defects
[k]
occur at di+l−1 , i ∈ I. In this setting, the LQ approximation,
Riccati recursion and state- and control updates (14)-(15)
can be performed as described before. This gives rise to two
‘hybrid’ GNMS variants:
TABLE I
A N OVERVIEW OF DIFFERENT GNMS- TYPE METHODS .
SS iLQR GNMS GNMS(M ) iLQR-GNMS(M )
closed-loop
No. intervals
overwrite states
by integration
need stable initial
policy
(
–
1
1
–
N
–
M
M
depends
depends
–
–
= true, – = false)
•
•
GNMS(M), using solely the feedforward control and thus
performing an open-loop forward integration on each
of the M multiple shooting intervals, which themselves
are multiples of the control interval. Herewith, standard
single shooting is the limit case GNMS(1).
iLQR-GNMS(M), using the full state feedback controller (14) and a closed-loop forward integration of
each multiple-shooting interval. In other words, this is
equivalent to a multiple-shooting variant of iLQR. The
standard iLQR algorithm is the limit case of iLQRGNMS(1), with only one multiple-shooting interval.
Note that both GNMS(N ) and iLQR-GNMS(N ), with the
number of multiple shooting-intervals being equal to the
number of stages, revert to the standard GNMS formulation as
introduced in Section II. Table I provides a compact overview
of the algorithmic variants and compares their features.
C. Main Iteration and Implementation
We emphasize that all algorithmic variants feature linear
complexity in the time horizon, O(N ). All algorithms execute
almost identical linear algebra operations during one major
iteration and therefore have very similar computational
effort. Since the discussed family of GNMS algorithms
only differs in a few features, it can be summarized in
one framework, given in Algorithm 1. From a softwareengineering perspective, the algorithmic variants are easy
to implement and can all be treated at once, given a proper
design of classes and interfaces. We provide an open-source
C++ implementation of all discussed algorithms in [14].
D. Initialization
The GNMS variants listed in Table I differ in their
requirements for initialization. For iLQR and SS, the nominal
state (and control) input trajectories are first updated through
a forward integration. This implies that for unstable systems,
an initialization with a stabilizing initial control policy, which
keeps the first rollout in the vicinity of the expected optimum,
is essential. For iLQR, the initially provided state trajectory
X[0] serves as state reference trajectory for the feedback
controller. For SS, it is irrelevant, except for the initial state.
Common choices for SS and iLQR initial guesses are policies
that stabilize the given initial state or draw the system towards
the goal state, for example simple LQR or PD controllers.
Generally, the increased efforts for initial guess design for
SS and iLQR can be a significant disadvantage. In the worst
Algorithm 1 Generalized iLQR-GNMS(M ) Algorithm
Given
- Nonlinear dynamics, cost function and initial state xinit as given in (1)-(2)
- Initial state trajectory X[0]
- Initial feedforward trajectory U[0]
- (Initial feedback law, if applicable)
- maximum total constraint violation dmax
rel
- minimum relative cost change Jmin
Prepare
- set iteration count k = 0
- split time horizon N into M MS integration intervals of length l,
each starting at an index i ∈ I, I = {0, l, 2l, . . .}
- Initial multiple-shooting rollouts
- simulate M intervals using the nonlinear system dynamics (2) and initial
[0]
[0]
[0]
[0]
/I
states and controls xi and ui , overwrite all xj and uj for j ∈
- compute defects d[0]
according
to
Equation
(3).
n
Repeat (main iteration)
LQ approximation
- Linearize the dynamics along the trajectories, obtain the affine constraint (5)
- Quadratize cost function along the trajectories to obtain (6)
Riccati backward sweep
- Backwards solve the Riccati-like difference equations (11)-(12) with
boundary conditions SN = QN and sN = qN
Linear forward sweep
- compute state and control solution candidates X[k+1] and U[k+1] by
forward sweeping Equations (14) and (15).
Rollout multiple-shooting intervals
IF(open loop shooting)
- set feedback gain in Equation (14) to zero.
ENDIF
- simulate M shooting intervals using nonlin. dynamics (2), controller (14)
[k+1]
[k+1]
and initial states and controls xi
and ui
∈ I,
[k+1]
[k+1]
overwrite all xj
and uj
for j ∈
/I
- compute defects d[k+1]
according to Equation (3)
n
- compute cost J [k+1] by evaluating Equation (1)
- increment iteration count k
P [k]
rel
until |J [k] − J [k−1] |/J [k] < Jmin
and
|dn | < dmax
case, a poor initial guess can lead to a local minimum with
a solution far from desired behavior.
Multiple-shooting algorithms, by contrast, offer greater
flexibility and simplicity at initial guess design, and are often
more robust w.r.t. bad initial policies. It is a well known
fact that the convergence of multiple-shooting methods can
be accelerated through an ‘educated’ initial guess, such as
direct interpolation between initial and desired final state. For
the hybrid algorithms iLQR-GNMS(M ) and GNMS(M ) it
often depends on the system characteristics if a stabilizing
control policy is required, or if the multiple-shooting intervals
are short enough to prevent significant divergence during
integration. In the video attachment [15], we show two
simulation examples where initialization with a bad statefeedback controller significantly extends the runtime of iLQR
compared to GNMS, or even causes iLQR to fail.
Note that, when all possible GNMS variants are initialized
with a dynamically consistent state trajectory and corresponding control trajectory, the defects for the first iteration are
zero and the feedforward control updates are identical.
IV. R ESULTS AND C OMPARISON
A. An Illustrative, One-Dimensional System
As an illustrative example, we present a simple onedimensional system, which is slightly nonlinear, unstable
and constructed to help the reader build an intuition about
the methods. The system dynamics are ẋ = (1 + x)x + u,
x(0) = 1.5 and discretized with ∆t = 0.01 s, N = 300. The
cost function is defined as quadratic cost of form (6) with
x(t) (iteration 1)
u(t) (iteration 1)
0
1.5
1
-2
0.5
-4
0
1
2
3
0
1
t [s]
jd(t)j (iteration 1)
10 0
2
t [s]
total cost
10
1
10 -3
10 0
10 -6
10 -1
0
1
2
0
t[s]
4
6
iteration
control update L2 norm
10
2
Legend
2
initial guess
converged solution
iLQR
GNMS
iLQR-GNMS(5)
GNMS(5)
10 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
iteration
Fig. 2. Results for a one-dimensional illustrative system, main text for
detailed description.
desired terminal state xdes
N = 0, QN = 10 and Rn = 0.01.
Fig. 2 shows results for iLQR, GNMS and the hybrid variants
with five multiple-shooting intervals, GNMS(5) and iLQRGNMS(5). We plot the state, control and defect trajectories
for the first iteration of the algorithms, along with the initial
guess and the converged solution.
The state and control trajectories illustrate the relationship
between the algorithms: the multiple-shooting intervals of
GNMS(5) and iLQR-GNMS(5) start with states and controls
lying on the respective GNMS trajectories. For GNMS(5),
the system is simulated open-loop, the controls are identical
to GNMS, and the state trajectories on the multiple-shooting
intervals start to diverge. By contrast, for iLQR-GNMS(5),
in every multiple-shooting interval both state and control
trajectories converge asymptotically towards the simulated
iLQR state and control trajectories. For the hybrid variants,
a defect occurs every 0.6s, for GNMS, the defect is evenly
distributed across all time intervals. Due to the long shootingintervals, GNMS(5) requires one iteration more to catch up
with the other algorithms in terms of overall cost. Importantly,
the control update plot shows that the asymptotic contraction
rates, which are defined as
C = lim
k→∞
|U[k+1] −U∗ |2/|U[k] −U∗ |2
(16)
are not the same. In this example, GNMS and GNMS(5)
show better contraction than iLQR. Asymptotic contraction
rates are investigated in more detail in Section IV-C.
B. Quadruped Trot Optimization Example
The quadrupedal robot ‘HyQ’ [16] is an 18 DoF, floatingbase underactuated robot subject to contacts with the environment, c.f. Fig. 3. In this paper, the contacts are not
incorporated as constraints,
but added to the system
dynamics using an explicit
contact model. We employ
a static, plain environment
and a ‘soft’ contact model,
consisting of a nonlinear
spring in surface-normal
direction and a nonlinear
Fig. 3. The quadruped HyQ
damping term. The contact
model is detailed in [17]. Using this formulation, the contact
force is a function of the current robot state only. It is clear that
such a soft contact model presents only a rough approximation
of the complicated physics of contact, and also introduces a
number of potential disadvantages such as increased stiffness
and nonlinearity of the combined system dynamics. However,
the contact model allows a straight-forward computation of
derivatives [17], which creates an ideal test-bed for comparing
our shooting algorithms. We obtain exact discrete sensitivities
An and Bn through evaluating a sensitivity differential
equation on the multiple-shooting intervals [18].
The example task considered is the optimization of a
periodic trotting gait. To achieve the trotting gait, we impose
a time-varying quadratic penalty on the leg joint positions.
Furthermore, we penalize the intermediate and final position
of the robot’s trunk and the intermediate and final velocities
of the leg joints. For an in-depth description of the cost
modelling to achieve different gait patterns the reader is
referred to [8]. In the following, the trotting gait optimization
is used to compare the algorithms developed in this paper. For
a meaningful comparison, we initialize all algorithms with
identical state trajectories and control policies. The initial
guess corresponds to standing still in a steady state. We
optimize over 36 states, 12 control inputs and a total time
horizon of 2.5 seconds with N = 2500.
Fig. 4 compares iLQR, GNMS, and iLQR-GNMS(M )
with three different numbers of multiple-shooting intervals
in terms of cost descent, control update norms and total
defects. Note that SS and GNMS(M ) are unstable due to
the strong instability of the system. All remaining algorithms
converge to the same minimum within 20 iterations. iLQR and
iLQR-GNMS(25) show short phases of increasing cost, which
we accept in this simulation example. Since the provided
initial guess is dynamically consistent, the initial defects are
zero. GNMS, having the largest number of multiple-shooting
intervals (2500), also shows the largest total defect sum after
the first iteration. The multiple-shooting iLQR methods, all
having significantly fewer continuity constraints to enforce,
feature a lower total defect.
As expected for a Gauss-Newton method, all approaches
show linear convergence. Considering the control update
norms, we see that GNMS and iLQR feature a similar
contraction rate for this example. In fact, the contraction
rate of GNMS is slightly better, which is visually hard to
distinguish here, but is detailed in following example. For
the hybrid multiple-shooting iLQR variants, we observe a
significantly better contraction rate than for both iLQR and
#10 7
total cost
control update L2-norm
Normalized difference to Optimal Control
10 0
1.6
iLQR
GNMS
GNMS(50)
iLQR-GNMS(50)
| /u| 2
1.2
| "u| 2
1.4
10 4
10 -2
1
10 2
0.8
1
0
5
10
0
iteration
5
10
15
iteration
total defect L2-norm
Legend
iLQR
GNMS
iLQR-GNMS(25)
iLQR-GNMS(50)
iLQR-GNMS(100)
10 0
10 -5
0
5
10
15
2
20
3
4
iteration
20
Fig. 5. A statistical comparison of local contraction rates for four different
algorithms. This plot shows the normalized difference between solutions to
perturbed optimal control problems and a fully converged reference solution.
The normalization is w.r.t. the iLQR control trajectory. The data is averaged
from 1000 samples, the corresponding standard deviations are plotted as
error-bars. Estimates for the contraction rates are indicated by straight lines.
GNMS outperforms iLQR in terms of local contraction rate, and gets closer
to the true optimal solution in fewer iterations. In contrast to the example
in Section IV-B, GNMS(50) is stable and shows a contraction rate similar
to GNMS. iLQR-GNMS(50) clearly outperforms all other algorithms with
significantly better local contraction rate. After 4 iterations, it is on average
0.1% away from the fully converged reference solution, while iLQR is on
average 14% away.
iteration
Fig. 4. Comparing different algorithms from the family of Gauss-Newton
shooting methods w.r.t. cost descent, total defects and control update norm,
illustrated with the example of a quadruped trot optimization problem.
Asymptotic contraction rates
0.5
0.4
0.3
GNMS. When applying an identical termination criterion
based on the relative change of the cost function and a defect
threshold to all algorithms, all lifted methods converge in
fewer iterations than iLQR. Furthermore, all displayed iLQRGNMS(M ) variants converge notably faster than GNMS.
Screen recordings of the optimized trotting motions are
provided in the video attachment [15].
C. Local Contraction Rates for Quadruped Trot Tracking
While Section IV-B gives an optimization example for a single motion, starting with an initial guess far from the optimal
solution, we now show a comparison based on statistical data
from 1000 runs: the trotting gait from Section IV-B is now
considered in a tracking MPC problem. All algorithms are
initialized with an optimal, dynamically consistent solution,
but the initial state is locally perturbed. The state perturbations
are sampled from the hardware-experiments detailed in [19].
For every perturbation, we let different algorithms iterate until
convergence. Fig. 5 compares average asymptotic contraction
rates for four different algorithms. It shows the normalized
difference between a fully converged optimal feedforward
trajectory and trajectories obtained at previous iterations.
Furthermore it shows first-order regressions approximating
the local contraction rates, in terms of the slopes of the
difference norms in the semi-logarithmic plot. It can be seen
that GNMS outperforms iLQR in terms of local contraction
rate. GNMS(50) shows a contraction rate similar to GNMS.
The example indicates better local convergence for iLQRGNMS(50) than for classical iLQR, GNMS and GNMS(50).
Fig. 6 generalizes the result from Fig. 5 for a range of
multiple-shooting intervals M , showing numerically approximated asymptotic contraction rates, Equation (16), as a
0.2
10 0
iLQR-GNMS(M)
GNMS(M)
10 1
10 2
10 3
No. multiple shooting intervals M
Fig. 6. Comparing asymptotic contraction rates as a function of the number
of multiple-shooting intervals M . For GNMS(M ), the integration on the
multiple-shooting intervals is only stable for M ≥ 20. For this range of
‘stable’ multiple-shooting intervals, the contraction rates are almost constant
and similar to the limiting case GNMS. The iLQR multiple-shooting methods
are stable for all M . Here, the contraction rates for intermediate numbers
of multiple-shooting intervals are distinctively better than for the limit cases
iLQR and GNMS.
function of M . Again, GNMS(M ) is unstable for overly long
multiple-shooting intervals, similar to the limiting case openloop single shooting. For closed-loop shooting, the asymptotic
contraction rates for all multiple-shooting variants are better
than for iLQR, and the contraction rates for the hybrid
variants outperform the limiting case GNMS. In this example,
the relative improvement over iLQR is up to a factor two.
Note that the resulting iLQR-GNMS(M ) contraction rates
differ slightly from the ones in Fig. 4 for M = 25, 50, 100,
which is due to the different problem setting. However, both
experiments exhibit the same trend.
D. Nonlinear MPC on HyQ
The suitability of iLQR for nonlinear model-predictive
control (NMPC) in robotics applications has been shown
many times before, in [6], [20], [21]. In this section, we show
that GNMS and its hybrid variants are even more promising
for NMPC applications. First, they converge faster to the
optimal solution, c.f. Section IV-C. A second advantage of the
multiple-shooting variants of the presented algorithms is that
the forward integrations can be parallelized. Therefore, the
Algorithm 2 iLQR-GNMS(M )-NMPC Algorithm
Given
- cost function (1) and system dynamics (2).
- receding MPC time horizon N
- number of multiple-shooting intervals M with length l
- initial state and control trajectories X = {x0 , x1 , . . . , xN }
U = {u0 , u1 , . . . , uN −1 }, state-feedback controller un (x) of form (10)
Repeat Online:
Feedback phase
- get state measurement xmeas .
- forward integrate system dynamics (2) with x0 = xmeas on the first
multiple-shooting interval, compute A0,...,l−1 , B0,...,l−1 , defect dl−1
- quadratize cost function (1) around X and U for control stages 1, . . . , l − 1.
- solve LQ optimal control problem using a Riccati backward sweep
+
+
- retrieve updated control policy u+
n (x) and updated trajectories U , X .
+
- send policy u+
(x)
and
X
to
the
control
system
n
Preparation phase
+
+
- update: un (x) ← u+
n (x), X ← X , U ← U
- forward integrate system dynamics (2) for the multiple-shooting
intervals 1 to M , obtain sensitivities Al , . . . AN −1 , Bl , . . . , BN −1
and defects dl,...,N −1
- quadratize cost function (2) around X, U for multiple-shooting intervals l to N .
achievable MPC cycle time decreases approximately linearly
with the number of available CPU cores. By combining faster
update rates with better contraction rate, our multiple-shooting
algorithms outperform classical iLQR-NMPC.
In the following simulation example, we compare the
NMPC performance of our Gauss-Newton shooting algorithms against iLQR-NMPC in a HyQ simulation environment.
In each NMPC cycle, we run an adapted version of the
main iteration in Algorithm 1 and ‘warm-start’ it with
the previous solution. In such a setting, we can separate
an NMPC iteration into a ‘preparation’ and a ‘feedback’
phase [22], thus minimizing the latency between receiving
a state-measurement and sending an updated policy to the
control system. Our NMPC loop is described in Algorithm 2.
In this experiment, we run a trotting gait on HyQ, in closedloop MPC in a simulation environment [23]. For the NMPC
optimal control problem, we choose a time-step size of 4 ms
and N = 125. We parallelize the integration of all multipleshooting intervals and the sensitivity computation on four
cores, and run both simulator and MPC controller on the same
notebook equipped with an Intel Core i7 (2.8 GHz) processor.
For four different algorithmic combinations, we record the
executed trot under identical conditions for 18 seconds and
compute the resulting accumulated intermediate cost. A
summary of the achieved average cost and NMPC frequencies
is given in Fig. 7. In these experiments, iLQR results in
the highest accumulated cost. The multiple-shooting variants
outperform iLQR, with relative cost differences up to 5%. At
the same time, due to shorter runtimes, the multiple-shooting
variants achieve up to 40% higher MPC frequencies, with a
maximum of 103 Hz.
In our simulation, all four algorithm variants run in a stable
and robust fashion. The relatively small cost difference is
an indicator of better convergence, but the main reason why
the multiple-shooting variants should be preferred over iLQR
in real-world applications, is the superior control bandwidth.
The algorithms in this paper have been validated in hardware
experiments on two different quadruped platforms, where a
norm. accumulated MPC cost
1
MPC frequency [Hz]
100
0.8
80
0.6
60
0.4
40
0.2
20
0
0
R
iLQ
)
)
MS
25
(25
S(
GN
MS
NM
GN
G
RiLQ
R
iLQ
)
)
MS
25
(25
S(
MS
NM
GN
G
RiLQ
GN
Fig. 7. Comparing four different solvers for HyQ-MPC. The left plot
compares costs accumulated over 18.0 seconds of trotting-MPC execution.
iLQR shows the highest accumulated cost. The multiple-shooting variants
outperform iLQR, but the relative cost difference is small. GNMS runs at
96.3% of the iLQR cost, GNMS(25) at 95.9% and iLQR-GNMS(25) at
95.0%. Regarding the achieved average MPC frequencies, shown on the right,
we find up to 40% higher frequencies for the multiple-shooting variants.
The maximum average MPC frequency, 103 Hz, is achieved using GNMS.
variety of motions and gaits was implemented. However, a
in-depth description of the experimental setups, the optimized
computational framework and practical tuning considerations
are beyond the scope of this paper. The interested reader
is therefore referred to [19], where we apply the GNMSalgorithm for full-body NMPC on the quadrupeds HyQ and
ANYmal [24], explain the robotic setup in detail and present a
variety of hardware experiments. As outlook, a video sequence
of GNMS-NMPC running on hardware is provided in the
attachment [15].
V. C ONCLUSION AND O UTLOOK
In this paper, we have shown how the well-known iLQR
algorithm can be lifted and transformed into Gauss-Newton
Multiple Shooting, GNMS. We have generalized the concept
to form a family of Gauss-Newton shooting algorithms,
which can be distinguished into sequential and simultaneous
algorithms and closed and open-loop algorithms. Some
algorithms partially overwrite decision variables by means of
a numeric forward integration. All presented variants have
approximately the same computational cost and feature linear
time-complexity. Furthermore, all discussed algorithms share
a large number of computational routines, and it is not difficult
to implement all of the presented variants in a single software
framework.
We have compared the performance of the algorithms
in different simulation experiments, which indicate that
the lifted algorithms can outperform classical iLQR. While
not included in this paper for reasons of compactness,
similar results were obtained for other rigid-body dynamic
systems including a 6 DoF fixed-base arm model. A more
fundamental investigation for formalizing the conditions that
result in improved convergence rates for GNMS(M ) and
iLQR-GNMS(M ) is subject to ongoing work.
In the application examples, we limited the comparison to
full-step variants of all considered algorithms. However, for
even more nonlinear dynamics or cost functions, where the
LQ optimal control problem is a bad approximation to the
nonlinear problem, a globalization strategy may be required.
For single-shooting methods, a straight-forward solution is to
employ a line-search scheme. This is simple to implement,
as it is sufficient to search over the cost for different control
update step-sizes. For multiple-shooting approaches, however,
there are additional continuity constraints, and we need to
line-search over a merit-function which trades off the costs
and defects. It is typically required to introduce additional
tuning variables or to implement a complex filter-scheme [25].
Our open-source reference implementation [14] provides a
line-search scheme using a simple merit function.
For complex robot trajectory optimization problems, we
do not recommend to generally prioritize one of the presented algorithms over another. While the multiple-shooting
algorithms allow for advanced initialization strategies and
are more robust w.r.t. bad initial guesses, they may require
slightly more tuning efforts when the full-step algorithm is
not sufficient. By contrast, in NMPC applications with welldefined cost functions and using warm-starting, additional
globalization steps are rarely required at all. Here, our
multiple-shooting algorithms offer significant advantages,
better local contraction rates and much shorter runtimes.
The focus of this paper is on unconstrained optimal control
problems without general (in)equality path constraints. It is
obvious that the lifting approach naturally transfers to equalityconstrained variants of iLQR, such as [26]. The inclusion of
general (in)equality path constraints is part of ongoing work.
One option to include them in the existing framework is to
replace the standard Riccati backward sweep with a dedicated
solver for constrained LQ optimal control problems [27]. In
this way, general (in)equality path constraints can be included
while keeping linear time-complexity.
While this work treats algorithms using a Gauss-Newton
Hessian approximation, it similarly transfers to exact-Hessian
approaches, resulting in a multiple-shooting DDP algorithm
combining the advantages of simultaneous methods, quadratic
convergence and closed-loop integration.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors would like to thank Dimitris Kouzoupis, Gianluca
Frison, Mario Zanon and Timothy Sandy for fruitful discussions. This
research was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation
through the NCCR Digital Fabrication, the NCCR Robotics and
a Professorship Award to Jonas Buchli. Further, this research was
supported by the EU via FP7-ITN-TEMPO (607 957) and H2020ITN-AWESCO (642 682), by the Federal Ministry for Economic
Affairs and Energy (BMWi) via eco4wind and DyConPV, and by
DFG via Research Unit FOR 2401.
R EFERENCES
[1] D. Mayne, “A second-order gradient method for determining optimal
trajectories of non-linear discrete-time systems,” International Journal
of Control, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 85–95, 1966.
[2] H. G. Bock and K.-J. Plitt, “A multiple shooting algorithm for direct
solution of optimal control problems,” in Proceedings of the IFAC
World Congress, 1984.
[3] M. Diehl, H. G. Bock, H. Diedam, and P.-B. Wieber, “Fast direct
multiple shooting algorithms for optimal robot control,” in Fast motions
in biomechanics and robotics, pp. 65–93, Springer, 2006.
[4] J. Albersmeyer and M. Diehl, “The Lifted Newton Method and its
Application in Optimization,” SIAM Journal on Optimization, vol. 20,
no. 3, pp. 1655–1684, 2010.
[5] C. V. Rao, S. J. Wright, and J. B. Rawlings, “Application of interiorpoint methods to model predictive control,” Journal of Optimization
Theory and Applications, vol. 99, pp. 723–757, Dec 1998.
[6] J. Koenemann, A. Del Prete, Y. Tassa, E. Todorov, O. Stasse,
M. Bennewitz, and N. Mansard, “Whole-body model-predictive control
applied to the HRP-2 humanoid,” in 2015 IEEE/RSJ International
Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 3346–3351, 2015.
[7] Y. Tassa, T. Erez, and E. Todorov, “Synthesis and stabilization of
complex behaviors through online trajectory optimization,” in 2012
IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems,
pp. 4906–4913, Oct 2012.
[8] M. Neunert, F. Farshidian, A. W. Winkler, and J. Buchli, “Trajectory optimization through contacts and automatic gait discovery for
quadrupeds,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters (RA-L), 2017.
[9] B. Ponton, S. Schaal, and L. Righetti, “Risk sensitive nonlinear optimal
control with measurement uncertainty,” CoRR, 2016.
[10] F. Farshidian, M. Neunert, A. W. Winkler, G. Rey, and J. Buchli, “An
efficient optimal planning and control framework for quadrupedal
locomotion,” in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and
Automation (ICRA), 2017.
[11] E. Todorov and W. Li, “A generalized iterative LQG method for
locally-optimal feedback control of constrained nonlinear stochastic
systems,” in American Control Conference, 2005. Proceedings of the
2005, pp. 300–306, IEEE, 2005.
[12] A. Sideris and J. E. Bobrow, “An efficient sequential linear quadratic
algorithm for solving nonlinear optimal control problems,” Transactions
on Automatic Control, vol. 50, no. 12, pp. 2043–2047, 2005.
[13] A. Schäfer, Efficient Reduced Newton-Type Methods for Solution
of Large-Scale Structured Optimization Problems with Application
to Biological and Chemical Processes. PhD thesis, University of
Heidelberg, 2005.
[14] “The ‘Control Toolbox’ – An Open Source Library for Robotics and
Optimal Control.” https://adrlab.bitbucket.io/ct, 2017.
[Online; accessed 25-November-2017].
[15] https://youtu.be/423BTKn_cjQ.
[16] C. Semini, N. G. Tsagarakis, E. Guglielmino, M. Focchi, F. Cannella,
and D. G. Caldwell, “Design of HyQ–a hydraulically and electrically
actuated quadruped robot,” Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Journal
of Systems and Control Engineering, vol. 225, pp. 831–849, 2011.
[17] M. Giftthaler, M. Neunert, M. Stäuble, M. Frigerio, C. Semini, and
J. Buchli, “Automatic Differentiation of Rigid Body Dynamics for
Optimal Control and Estimation.” Advanced Robotics, November 2017.
[18] R. P. Dickinson and R. J. Gelinas, “Sensitivity analysis of ordinary
differential equation systemsa direct method,” Journal of Computational
Physics, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 123 – 143, 1976.
[19] M. Neunert, M. Stäuble, M. Giftthaler, C. D. Bellicoso, J. Carius,
C. Gehring, M. Hutter, and J. Buchli, “Whole-Body Nonlinear
Model Predictive Control Through Contacts for Quadrupeds,” 2017.
arXiv:1712.02889 [cs.RO].
[20] M. Neunert, C. de Crousaz, F. Furrer, M. Kamel, F. Farshidian,
R. Siegwart, and J. Buchli, “Fast nonlinear model predictive control
for unified trajectory optimization and tracking,” in IEEE International
Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2016.
[21] M. Giftthaler, F. Farshidian, T. Sandy, L. Stadelmann, and J. Buchli,
“Efficient Kinematic Planning for Mobile Manipulators with Nonholonomic Constraints Using Optimal Control,” in IEEE International
Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2017.
[22] M. Diehl, H. Bock, J. P. Schlöder, R. Findeisen, Z. Nagy, and
F. Allgöwer, “Real-time optimization and nonlinear model predictive
control of processes governed by differential-algebraic equations,”
Journal of Process Control, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 577 – 585, 2002.
[23] S. Schaal, “The SL simulation and real-time control software package,”
tech. rep., Los Angeles, CA, 2009.
[24] M. Hutter, C. Gehring, D. Jud, A. Lauber, C. D. Bellicoso, V. Tsounis,
J. Hwangbo, K. Bodie, P. Fankhauser, M. Bloesch, R. Diethelm, S. Bachmann, A. Melzer, and M. Hoepflinger, “Anymal - a highly mobile
and dynamic quadrupedal robot,” in 2016 IEEE/RSJ International
Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 38–44, Oct
2016.
[25] J. Nocedal and S. J. Wright, Numerical Optimization. Springer, 1999.
[26] A. Sideris and L. A. Rodriguez, “A Riccati approach for constrained
linear quadratic optimal control,” International Journal of Control,
vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 370–380, 2011.
[27] G. Frison, Algorithms and Methods for Fast Model Predictive Control.
PhD thesis, Technical University of Denmark, 2015.
| 3cs.SY
|
How Are Programs Found?
Speculating About Language Ergonomics With Curry-Howard
Johannes Emerich
arXiv:1612.00670v1 [cs.PL] 2 Dec 2016
[email protected]
Abstract
Functional languages with strong static type systems have
beneficial properties to help ensure program correctness and
reliability. Surprisingly, their practical significance in applications is low relative to other languages lacking in those
dimensions. In this paper, the programs-as-proofs analogy
is taken seriously to gain speculative insights by analysis of
creation habits in the proof-centric discipline of mathematics. Viewed in light of this analogy, a sampling of mathematicians’ attitudes towards formal proof suggests that the
crucial role of intuition and experimentation in programming
tasks may be under appreciated, hinting at a possible explanation of the challenges rigorously disciplined languages
face in practical applications.
Categories and Subject Descriptors D.3 [Programming
Languages]; K.2 [History of Computing]: Software
Keywords language ergonomics, type systems, programming systems, programs as proofs, propositions as types
1.
Introduction
The thoughts in this paper grew over the course of a year,
out of the opening remarks of my thesis defense in logic,
as well as a series of informal discussions I have had since
starting an industry job as a software developer. While I am
in no way sure that what I am saying is authoritative or true,
it has been my impression that my line of thought has been
thought-provoking for those on the receiving end, and it is in
this spirit that I decided to elaborate my thoughts into a form
that might potentially reach a wider audience.
Being a student of logic with a professional and practical
interest in computer programming, I was looking to write my
thesis in an area that would gainfully combine both topics
(Emerich 2015). The topic of type systems for programming
languages was an obvious fit, but I soon faced with a puzzle:
As a student of logic, everything about sound static type systems seemed obviously right, beautiful and true, and the research papers and languages I worked through made perfect
sense. On the other hand, from my professional work in software development, I knew how little attention industry paid
to the rightness, beauty and truth of this approach to programming. My puzzlement is certainly shared in large parts
of the programming language theory community: If “types
are the leaven of computer programming; they make it digestible” (Milner), they are light-weight formal methods that
automatically prove “the absence of certain program behaviors” (Pierce) (both Pierce 2002), and we all want to write
correct programs, why would anyone not use them? And especially, why would big, for-profit companies opt to not use
them, or use such perversions of type systems as to render
any guarantees worthless?
Industry practitioners seldom explain their motives but
simply vote with their feet, or if they do explain, they explain in terms incomprehensible to PL researchers. It is not
surprising then that the disregard for advanced type systems
is often explained away by stupidity, carelessness, or lack of
proper education. Without even wanting to dispute these labels, I started to wonder whom programming languages are
created for. If a technological artifact is inadequate for its intended target audience and therefore its intended use case, it
is unacceptable to blame the recipients of the artifact.
To illustrate, let us look at another discipline where technological artifacts are designed for a large audience, and
which is often invoked in certain parts of the software engineering community: architecture.
In the wake of World War II, war-time destruction and
the rapid growth of metropolitan areas necessitated the rapid
provision of affordable housing. In countries all around the
world, a solution was seen in modernist living machines.
High-rise buildings for a new kind of communal living were
built with great enthusiasm, and abandoned with great disappointment as many of the projects became attractors of
poverty and living conditions rapidly deteriorated. New concepts for urban development with dense housing have incorporated feedback from this failing to create less fragile living
environments for human beings. Another example of well-
intended but ultimately failed architecture is Haus Wittgenstein in Vienna, a modernist building designed in part by
philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein. Few of his family members succeeded to live in this house for long, even while remarking on its beauty and elegance.
Would we find it convincing if the architects of modernist high-rise projects or Haus Wittgenstein blamed their
dwellers for their inability to dwell in them? If they declared them too uneducated to live properly? I think not.
Why then should we let programming language researchers
off the hook, if their artifacts fail to meet the needs of the
programming community?
What is to be done to learn about the needs of humans
when constructing programs? Ultimately, this is an empirical
question, requiring research and approximation by trial and
error. To guide both processes, it is prudent to start with
some judicious guessing. This speculative text is an attempt
to judiciously guess plausible hypotheses from an analysis
of 20th century mathematics.
Section 2 introduces a formal connection between mathematics and computer programming, and questions the implied role of formal proof in mathematical practice. Section 3 stops at several points of historical significance in
the past hundred or so years in mathematics, summarizing
discussions about the interplay of intuition, formalism and
rigor. Section 4 looks back at recurring themes found in said
discussions, takes the programs-as-proofs analogy seriously,
and defines some criteria to evaluate programming systems
by. In section 5 these criteria are applied to a small number
of recent proposals for programming languages and systems.
Section 6 concludes.
2.
Programming in the Image of
Mathematics
Modern day research in type systems for programming languages occurs in fruitful collaboration with research in type
theory and mathematical logic. Languages like Haskell and
OCaml are part of the lineage of ML, a language grown out
of a system for theorem proving. GHC, the Glasgow Haskell
Compiler, supports a variety of extensions to Haskell’s type
system, that bring it closer to the powerful dependent type
systems found in proof assistants like Coq and Agda. The
connection between programming languages and mathematical logic is described succinctly in Per Martin-Löf’s influential Constructive Mathematics and Computer Programming
(Martin-Löf 1985):
Parallel to the development from low to high level
programming languages, there has been a change in
one’s understanding of the programming activity itself. It used to be looked (down) upon as the rather
messy job of instructing this or that physically existing machine, by cunning tricks, to perform computational tasks widely surpassing our own physical powers, something that might appeal to people with a lik-
ing for crossword puzzles or chess problems. But it
has grown into the discipline of designing programs
for various computational tasks, programs that have
to be written in a formally precise notation so as to
admit of automatic execution. [. . . ] It has made programming an activity akin in rigour and beauty to that
of proving mathematical theorems. (This analogy is
actually exact in a sense which will become clear below.)
The way in which the analogy is “actually exact” is by
means of a Curry-Howard-style correspondence between a
fictitious programming language (borrowing from ALGOL,
PASCAL and LISP) and Martin-Löf’s theory of types. What
this correspondence really shows exactly is that in an adequate language, the activity of writing programs is equivalent to the activity of writing a formal proof1 .
It is of course the unfamiliarity of the computer scientist
or logician with actual mathematical practice that allows
them to conclude that this is, without qualification, a good
thing. If, however, we look at the history of mathematics in
the last hundred or so years, we see that even in mathematics
the role of formal proof is contested or at least much more
complicated than commonly assumed.
The monograph The Mathematical Experience stems
from 1981, close to Martin-Löf’s 1985 paper. Therein, Hersh
and Davis describe “the most mathematician-like mathematician”2 to display “the discrepancy between the actual
work and activity” and even “his own perception of his work
and activity” (Davis and Hersh 1981, p. 34ff.). I will quote
selectively, though at some length, to illustrate:
He rests his faith on rigorous proof; he believes that
the difference between a correct proof and an incorrect one is an unmistakable and decisive difference.
[. . . ] Yet he is able to give no coherent explanation of
what is meant by rigor, or what is required to make
a proof rigorous. In his own work, the line between
complete and incomplete proof is always somewhat
fuzzy, and often controversial.
[. . . ]
To his fellow experts, he communicates [his] results
in a casual shorthand. “If you apply a tangential mollifier to the left quasi-martingale, you can get an estimate better than quadratic, so the convergence in the
Bergstein theorem turns out to be of the same order
as the degree of approximation in the Steinberg theorem.” This breezy style is not to be found in his published writings. There he piles up formalism on top of
formalism. Three pages of definitions are followed by
seven lemmas, and, finally, a theorem whose hypothe1 For
a modern introduction and brief history, see (Wadler 2015).
was customary at the time, this most mathematician-like mathematician is styled as “he”.
2 As
ses take half a page to state, while its proof reduces essentially to “Apply Lemmas 1–7 to definitions A–H.”
We begin our analysis, abruptly, early in the 20th century,
with the foundational crisis in mathematics in full swing.
In response to misunderstandings and embarrassing failures
in the face of an ever more significant mathematics, mathematicians, logicians and philosophers tried to establish foundations that would confirm and guarantee their understanding of mathematics as the house of certainty. To restore the
endangered reputation of mathematics as a prototype of the
most rigid science, the goal had to be not only to axiomatize all of mathematics, but also to show that in the chosen axiomatization contradictions are in general impossible
(Hilbert 1917, p. 411). Even Russell’s generous endeavor
of axiomatizing all of logic was not sufficient according to
Hilbert, as it was still necessary to establish that every mathematical problem has a solution (no ignorabimus), that every
solution can be verified, and to find a measure for the simplicity of a proof. To put this plan into action, mathematical
concepts and practices such as propositions and proofs had
to be reified into mathematical objects that could be studied
with mathematical methods. The famous rigor of mathematics was to be applied to mathematics itself. The successes
and failures of Hilbert’s program are famous, but its reception was mixed from the onset.
believed it was the “very nature of their mind which makes
them logicians or intuitionalists”, and while “[the] first are
incapable of ‘seeing in space’, the others are quickly tired
of long calculations and become perplexed”. But both are
“equally necessary for the progress of science”, both “have
achieved great things that others could not have done”.
Poincaré however was not blind to the progressive shift
towards formality and rigor, even among the “intuitionalists”, as “their readers have required of them greater concessions”. The reason for this shift is the recognition that
intuition “cannot give us rigour, nor even certainty”. This is
why formalism and logical analysis are necessary to further
progress, a kind of cleaning up and clarifying that prevents
illicit jumping to conclusions. But “intuition must retain its
role as complement, [...] or as antidote to logic”, not just for
the student but also the creative scientist. To see the unity in
a mathematical problem, we need “a faculty which makes us
see the end from afar, and intuition is this faculty” (p. 1018).
Poincaré uses the example of the concept of a continuous
function, which from the image of a continuous mark of
chalk gradually turned into a construction “irreproachable
in the eyes of the logician”. But even the logician relies on
some sort of intuition, only, as in the case of Hermite, “the
most abstract entities were for him like living beings”, allowing them to “perceive at a glance the general plan of a logical
edifice”. “In rejecting the aid of the imagination, which, as
we have seen, is not always infallible, they can advance without fear of deceiving themselves. Happy, therefore, are those
who can do without this aid! We must admire them; but how
rare they are!”
Poincaré, it seems, was not among them. His thesis adviser characterized him as follows: “It must be said, if one
wants to give an accurate idea of how Poincaré worked, that
many points of [his thesis] needed correction or explication.
Poincaré was an intuitif ” (cited after Mclarty 1997). Mclarty
states that many of Poincaré’s publications offered crucial
new insights, laying the foundations to whole fields, all
while employing hasty (or no) proofs, and getting substantial details wrong that were later to be worked out by others.
Poincaré’s question, “Who would venture to say whether he
preferred that Weierstrass had never written or that there had
never been a Riemann?”, should be restated for the reader:
“Who would wish that there had never been a Poincaré?”
3.1
3.2
When asked for a definition of proof, he gives one as
“cleared up by the logician Tarski [. . . ] and some others,
maybe Russell or Peano”, but also says that “of course no
one ever really does it. It would take forever!” The less one
knows about formal languages and formal logic, the better,
as “[that] stuff is all abstract nonsense anyway”.
Now, would our ideal mathematician be happy to do his
work in Martin-Löf’s formal theory of types? One should
think not. Then why are we surprised if the average programmer does not seem to take to an equivalent programming system?
We will, in the following, undertake a brief historical tour
of mathematics to find some clues as to why mathematical
practice does not conform to the ideal of formal proof.
3.
Intuition and Formal Proof in
Mathematics
Poincaré on Intuition and Logic
Of interest for our analysis is the stance of Henri Poincaré,
who was at once appreciative of the quest for certainty and
skeptical of the emphasis on formalism. In a 1900 essay,
Poincaré identifies “two entirely different kinds of minds”
among great mathematicians, “one sort are above all preoccupied with logic”, advancing “step by step, after the manner
of a Vauban who pushes on his trenches against the place besieged, leaving nothing to chance”, and the other are “guided
by intuition and at the first stroke make quick but sometimes
precarious conquests” (Poincaré 2005, p. 1012). Poincare
New Math: Real Mathematics Comes to Schools
The foundational crisis in the past, and its shocking revelations absorbed or ignored, parts of the formalists’ results
and spirit found their way into research mathematics. Probably the prototypical example of 20th -century formalist mathematics is the highly influential work of Nicolas Bourbaki,
a group of predominantly French mathematicians. According to a member, Bourbaki was set up almost in opposition to the intuitif Poincaré, against the older generation that
“had learned mathematics in the old-fashioned way”, “it was
not the fashion to value Poincaré at all” (Senechal 1998).
In the 1960s, this spirit of renewal found its way into primary education in mathematics. Today still known (and often ridiculed) under the moniker “new math”, various educational reform programs in the United States and Europe put
set theory, Boolean algebra and further abstract nonsense on
schools’ curricula. A cautionary tale of educational reform
implemented in haste and abandoned without much analysis
or care, new math disappeared as quickly as it had been put
on the agenda, as teachers felt unable to teach and parents
unable to understand the new materials. The history of the
new math is complex and frequently misconstrued (Phillips
2015, p. 145), but the reactions of contemporary mathematicians to its introduction provide interesting insight into their
attitudes. Especially in the United States, the reform efforts
led to controversies among professional mathematicians and
scientists, triggered not by the new emphasis on and interest
in mathematics education, but by the image of mathematics thought to be underlying the reform proposals (Phillips
2014).
Physicist Richard Feynman in a commentary on new
math stresses the importance of freedom, experimentation
and intuition in learning and practicing mathematics (Feynman 1965). While this spirit “does not appear in [a mathematician’s] final proofs, which are simply demonstrations
or complete logical arguments which prove that a certain
conclusion is correct”, it is present in the way that he works
in “in order to obtain a guess as to what it is he is going to
prove before he proves it”. To give authority to his claim, he
quotes a pure mathematician, J.B. Roberts:
The scheme in mathematical thinking is to divine and
demonstrate. There are no set patterns of procedure.
We try this and that. We guess. We try to generalize
the result in order to make the proof easier. We try
special cases to see if any insight can be gained in this
way. Finally – who knows how? – a proof is obtained.
Mathematician and educator Morris Kline spent considerable effort arguing against the new curriculum, publishing both an essay, Logic Versus Pedagogy (Kline 1970), and
a book, Why Johnny Can’t Add (Kline 1974). His protest
against the reform was motivated by a strong belief in the
importance of intuition and gradual development in mathematical training and practice. The arguments in both texts
make much use of historical developments and anecdotes,
illustrating the imperfections and intuitive leaps present in
the work of accomplished mathematicians. Kline presents as
an example the development of calculus from the basic concept of “instantaneous rate of change of a function” (Kline
1970, p. 267) to the modern formally precise expression. He
documents the vague and faulty conceptualization evident in
the writings of Newton and Leibniz, and Newton’s defense
of his work against “overprecise critics” posing a threat to
the “fruits of invention”. The same aspect is highlighted in
Cauchy’s use of differentiability where he had only assumed
continuity, making, on the whole, substantial progress.
Like Feynman, Kline sees mathematics as “primarily a
creative activity, and this calls for imagination, geometric intuition, experimentation, judicious guessing, trial and error,
the use of analogies of the vaguest sort, blundering and fumbling” (p. 271). To counter the response that intuition plays
this important role only in those new to a subject matter,
Kline recounts the anecdote of “the professor who was presenting a logical proof to his class, got stuck in the course of
the proof, went over to the corner of the blackboard where he
drew some pictures, erased the pictures, and then continued
the proof” (p. 280).
In the end Kline concedes, quoting Weyl, that “logic is
the hygiene which the mathematician practices to keep his
ideas healthy and strong”.
3.3
The Threat of Speculative Mathematics
Our third episode is set in 1993–1994, a discussion held
in the Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society and
triggered by a call for action by Arthur Jaffe and Frank
Quinn (Jaffe and Quinn 1993). The authors worried about
a perceived trend of an increase in speculative mathematics, due in part to a cultural clash between mathematics
and physics. A nearly categorical statement opens the paper:
“Modern mathematics is nearly characterized by the use of
rigorous proofs”. This is qualified to say that “information
about mathematical structures is achieved in two stages”,
in the first stage “intuitive insights are developed, conjectures are made, and speculative outlines of justifications are
suggested”, in the second “the conjectures and speculations
are corrected; they are made reliable by proving them”. The
two-stage process is compared to physics, divided in theoretical and experimental physics. For Jaffe and Quinn, theoretical physics is analogous to the speculative, intuitive stage
in mathematical discovery, while experimental physics is
analogous to verification and proof of speculation. Where
in physics there has been productive division of labor along
those lines, Jaffe and Quinn decry what they see as an onslaught of speculative mathematics (which they call theoretical mathematics), arguing that the culture of mathematics
is unprepared. A list of cautionary tales of speculative mathematics gone wrong is followed by a problem characterization: Speculative work easily goes astray for lack of corrections from rigorous proof, it hinders further work by causing
confusion about which parts are reliable, it gives glory to the
theorizers while leaving ungrateful cleanup work for others,
and finally confuses newcomers. They end with a short list of
prescriptions to amend the situation, mostly calling for explicit labeling of speculative work, and thus shifting culture
to reserve some glory for the task of rigorous validation.
This call was answered in a later issue of the bulletin
(Atiyah et al. 1994), in good numbers by some of the speculative perpetrators Jaffe and Quinn had reprimanded. I can
only recommend reading the responses, as they provide a
fascinating insight into the varieties of approaches and selfimages among researchers in mathematics. The reader following this advice will notice that my quotations in the following are highly selective, which should not be reason for
concern, considering that my claim is not that every mathematician looks at intuition and formal proof in the way suggested, but only that at least some amount of accomplished
mathematicians do.
We find the first commentator, Michael Atiyah, “agreeing
with much of the detail”, but rebelling “against their general
tone and attitude”, presenting “a sanitized view of mathematics which condemns the subject to an arthritic old age”
(p. 178). “But if mathematics is to rejuvenate itself and break
exciting new ground it will have to allow for the exploration
of new ideas and techniques which, in their creative phase,
are likely to be as dubious as in some of the great eras of
the past. Perhaps we now have high standards of proof to
aim at but, in the early stages of new developments, we must
be prepared to act in more buccaneering style”. Providing an
example, “Hodge’s own proof was essentially faulty because
his understanding of the necessary analysis was inadequate.
Correct proofs were subsequently provided by better analysts, but this did not detract from Hodge’s glory”.
In a scathing comment, Armand Borel refers to the periodic waves of innovation and rigorization/systematization
that have been a permanent feature of mathematics, accompanied constantly by fears that one might overpower the
other. “Of course, [...] no part of mathematics can flourish
in a lasting way without solid foundations and proofs”.
Benoit Mandelbrot finds “most of it appalling”. For him,
Jaffe and Quinn’s proposal is reminiscent of the shunning
of great intuitive mathematicians such as Lévy and Poincaré
by the mathematical establishment. He even goes so far as
to ask why there had been so few great intuitive researchers
of recent, and speaks of a “flow of young people” who were
“acknowledged as brilliant and highly promising; but they
could not stomach the Bourbaki credo” and left mathematics.
Saunders Mac Lane responds with an anecdote about a
discussion between Atiyah and himself, “about how mathematical research is done”.
For Mac Lane it meant getting and understanding the
needed definitions, working with them to see what
could be calculated and what might be true, to finally
come up with new “structure” theorems. For Atiyah, it
meant thinking hard about a somewhat vague and uncertain situation, trying to guess what might be found
out, and only then finally reaching definitions and the
definitive theorems and proofs. This story indicates
that the ways of doing mathematics can vary sharply,
as in this case between the fields of algebra and geometry, while at the end there was full agreement on the
final goal: theorems with proofs. Thus differently ori-
ented mathematicians have sharply different ways of
thought, but also common standards as to the result.
If only the same could be said about differently oriented programmers! (Mac Lane goes on to say: “The sequence of the
understanding of mathematics may be: intuition, trial, error,
speculation, conjecture, proof. The mixture and the sequence
of these events differ widely in different domains, but there is
general agreement that the end product is rigorous proof—
which we know and can recognize, without the formal advice of the logicians.”)
We see a wide spectrum of opinions on the role of rigorous proof in professional mathematics. On one end, Mac
Lane voices a clear stance against ungrounded speculation
and a demand for proof as the golden standard, but paired
with a laissez-faire attitude towards the creative habits of individuals. On the other, Mandelbrot finds it sufficient to put
forward his discoveries as conjectures, arguing against a unified narrow conception of what is acceptable mathematics.
What we find in common among all cited here, however, is
insistence on the value and necessity of a multitude of intuitive approaches to mathematical creation.
3.4
Interactive Theorem Proving
We shall finally look at some contemporary trends in mathematics. A current issue that has been in the making for
much of the twentieth century but only recently has found
increased attention is the use of computer-aided proof environments to develop and verify completely rigorous formal
proofs. With this, we loop back to Martin-Löf’s theory of
types discussed in the very beginning.
Our source is the recently published Type Theory and Formal Proof (Geuvers and Nederpelt 2014). The book builds
up a formal system λD somewhat similar to Martin-Löf type
theory, extending the Calculus of Constructions with constructs first introduced in the Automath system of N.G. de
Bruijn. After having built up the system to a substantial degree, the real work begins, by formalizing a real mathematical theorem (Bézout’s lemma) and its proof in the system,
illustrating that it is adequate for capturing serious mathematical content. It may be noted that this shows the adequacy
for formalizing an existing and known proof.
Chapter 16, Further perspectives uses observations from
the proof of Bézout’s lemma along with general considerations to reflect on the system λD and type-theory-based
proof assistants more generally. We collect here some quotes
and discuss the implied context under which proof assistants
may be used. “The type theory λD provides a system in
which mathematical definitions, statements and proofs can
be completely spelled out in a very structured way that is still
close to ordinary mathematical practice. This enables and facilitates the formalization of mathematics and the checking
of its correctness. [. . . ] The high level of precision of type
theory greatly improves the level of correctness of the formalized mathematics: incomplete proofs, or proofs using il-
legal logical steps, are not accepted” (p. 379). The diagram
on page 381 is relevant, because it uses as inputs informal
proof p and informal statement A, thus assumes that both
have been formed at this point. If however we have not yet
fully formed p and A, the fact that the “precision of λD
guides the proof development” (p. 380) may come back to
bite us. It is no doubt a good thing that at some point a precise guide will point to flaws in the details of the development, but doing so early may lead the user astray trying to
verify a nonsensical side-show statement that could easily be
falsified by a quick series of trial and error. The author has
made this experience first-hand working with the Coq proof
assistant.
Their chapter closes with a prognosis: “Proof assistants
have not yet developed into a standard tool for mathematicians, but we strongly believe they will in the future”
(p. 387). In the world of mathematics, there is a culture delineating the phases of discovery and rigorization that suggests
methods for the discovery process and may indeed enable
publications to spell out results for proof checkers in ways
similar to how results are elaborated into semi-formal proofs
today. We have seen that there is by no means agreement on
this, but at least mathematicians don’t generally assume they
have to start with the formal process.
In programming however, I am not aware of a general
agreement that problems have first to be solved in pen and
paper before their “formalization” as a program is to be
started. What is more, programming tasks frequently are embedded in real-world interactions that require experiments
instead of just pen-and-paper simulations.
4.
Learning by Analogy
We can summarize as follows: The 20th century has seen
increased interest in the foundations of mathematics and a
better understanding of the notion of proof. While rigorous
proof can be seen as emblematic of modern mathematics,
completely formal proof has been a polite fiction or idealization in research mathematics. A vocal community of mathematicians insists on the continued importance of intuition
for the further development of mathematical content and objects to a prescriptive straitjacket that they fear would stand
in the way of creative discovery.
Just how does this affect the practice of computer programming? Like mathematical argumentation, program construction has undergone a series of rigorizations to prevent
the final product from going wrong. The parallel is so pronounced that there is an exact formal correspondence between various formal logics and programming languages,
and there is an important sense in which program construction is equivalent to proof construction. More precisely, it is
equivalent to the construction of completely formal proof.
We have seen that in the mathematical community the
activity of formal derivation is not generally seen as adequate for the creation of new mathematical content. This
begs the question: How do programmers working in rigorous languages find programs?
Mathematicians, in my layman’s eyes, have highly idiosyncratic methods of discovery, and there is no reason for
programmers to be any more constrained. Indeed, when exempt from corporate restrictions, programmers are free to
employ whichever methods they find helpful in discovery:
whiteboard sketches, pen and paper traces, contemplation
of denotational semantics, Node.js prototypes, etc. And no
doubt, in the era before time-sharing and personal computers, offline algorithm design was the norm, and one can still
find industry veterans today who claim to spend weeks developing programs without compiling. Today’s generation
of programmers however grew up on REPLs and the editrefresh-run loop of browser development. The expectation is
that the computer is an interactive device providing instantaneous feedback. The computer acts as a laboratory for the
discovery of programs.
It would certainly be easy to dismiss this approach as
dilettantism, the mark of the amateur, and it is certainly true
that experienced practitioners develop higher level reasoning for familiar problems. But it should be recalled that in
order to understand a problem, mathematicians employ “experimentation, judicious guessing, trial and error, the use
of analogies of the vaguest sort, blundering and fumbling”
(Kline) and run through special cases (Roberts) in their
blackboard or pen and paper labs. With a powerful computing machine on their desks, why would programmers not
want to make use of it for exploring the problem space by
means of experiment?
Quickly observing the behavior of a few specific instances can give a feeling for the active forces in a process.
Being able to push a value through my program and see the
resulting crash can be illuminating with an immediacy not
found in a lifeless compile-time error. For a quick sanity
check I can run a partial implementation early, even though
I have not announced all my assumptions (invariants) to the
compiler, because I know which precise input I will use. If
these activities are useful and we deprive the programmer
of such means of discovery, she will opt for a system in
which the balance between discovery and comprehensibility
is more to her (present) advantage.
4.1
A Bad Proposal: Prototype in Lisp, Implement in
Haskell
One might think that we already have all the ingredients:
Permissive dynamic languages and safe statically typed languages. So it is fine to fumble and blunder in Python or Lisp,
but the real work needs to happen in a disciplined language.
This does not seem to lead very far, however. The current
trend in software development is towards agile and away
from waterfall methods. Programs are not discovered in one
creative act to then be reconstructed cleanly and rigorously.
Software is often long-lived, undergoing constant evolution.
A possibly stable and rigorous core needs to be seamlessly
integrated with a more provisional, in-flux surface area.
It is often an additional requirement to be able to interact
with existing software libraries, such that a separate prototyping environment becomes unwieldy. When asked about
the motivation to replace the Structure and Interpretation
of Computer Programs course with a Python-based course
in the MIT undergraduate curriculum, Gerald Sussman responded that the type of engineering required to write software had changed in the 1990s. Instead of the analysis and
synthesis view taught in SICP, what was now needed was
a more experimental, science-like approach in which “you
grab this piece of library, and you poke at it [. . . ] see what
it does” (Sussman 2016). Sussman readily admitted that the
previous curriculum was more coherent, but engineering had
changed, and it was necessary to find a new way to do and
teach it, even if they were still in search of the right approach. Not just first-in-class teaching curricula, but also
first-in-class programming systems need to adapt to the real
contextual usage requirements.
4.2
Gradual Rigor
If rigorous methods in practical software construction are to
succeed, they can not be hermetically sealed off from environments that allow for creative discovery and preliminary
approximations. An ideal programming system would allow
for a wide spectrum of program construction, granting freedom for the act of discovery and means for the hygiene of
rigorization as an approach crystallizes.
As in mathematics, our goal should be enough rigor to
keep our programs healthy and strong, but enough flexibility
to enable us to fumble and blunder when still figuring things
out. And like in mathematics, we should be able to move fluently, competently, and with confidence between both ends
of the spectrum.
Realism about the work of the practitioner In a 1979 paper DeMillo, Lipton and Perlis (DeMillo et al. 1979) challenged the software verification community to move from
a standard of perfection to a standard of reliability, arguing that even in mathematics “absolute rigor” had, in fact,
not been attained, and even less so in applied engineering
disciplines. They pointed to the supposed infeasibility of
full verification by social processes such as the judging of
proof by an expert audience. Type systems can be seen as a
partial response to this problem, where verification is done
automatically by machines instead of a human community.
The promise of dependent type systems is to far extend the
reach of possible correctness guarantees embedded in proofcarrying code (Asperti et al. 2009).
This line of research seems to provide very apt responses
to the problem of verification described by DeMillo et al.,
by replacing the manual social verification step by machine
verification, based on a codification of the accepted intersubjective standard. But this does not absolve of the question
of how the design of languages with an eye towards easy
automatic verification affects the resulting languages and its
users as individuals for the purpose of initial creation. In this
context, it will not do to give some principled theoretical
account of possibility, but details of language ergonomics
will have to be considered. A notorious polemic declares
that untyped languages are unityped, and thus a mere special case of statically typed languages (Harper 2011, elaborated in Harper 2012). This clarification is highly interesting, but in no way accounts for the actual usage affordances
of static and dynamic languages, respectively. Harper makes
great points about the potential power of dynamicity safely
integrated into a statically disciplined language, while at the
same time giving nothing but condescending explanations
for the popularity of dynamic languages.
In mathematics, we saw a folklore belief (or pretense?)
that rigorous formal proof is at the center of the mathematician’s practice, but considerable evidence that this is not the
full story, and even found vocal individuals insisting on the
importance and legitimacy of non-formal methods. Maybe
the work of mathematicians is in principle equivalent to formal proof, but in the reality of the details, it is not. Maybe
also, in the reality of the details, programmers find it easier
to discover solutions to their tasks in the degenerate unityped
languages they choose over languages with strong advanced
type systems.
4.3
The Landscape Today
In today’s mainstream programming language landscape,
programmers have few options other than making a choice
between languages with a simple and comprehensible mathematical foundation but with a tightly controlled execution
model that disallows or disincentivizes direct experimentation, and languages which will allow for fumbling and blundering but do not offer a clear path towards a rigorous formulation with strong static correctness guarantees.
On one end of the spectrum, Haskell and OCaml are popular statically typed functional languages. Their semantics
are relatively simple and amenable to mathematical reasoning, and they possess powerful static type systems that are
still growing in expressivity. These are the languages that
most seem to correspond to the vision of programming conjured up by Martin-Löf.
On the other end of the spectrum, scripting languages
like Ruby, Python or JavaScript are conceptually less predictable and do not lend themselves to mathematical reasoning. The lack of compile-time type checking makes it easy to
experiment and write programs by incremental approximation, but also prevents compile-time guarantees about program correctness, and disadvantages the language with respect to tools support.
Languages like Java, C# or C++ provide static type systems that give them compile-time checks, superior tooling,
and often superior run-time performance. On the other hand,
they are not constructed around principles that allow for
straight-forward application of modes of mathematical reasoning. They possess type systems that still leave ample
room for fumbling and blundering, but provide little help in
eventually leaving that stage.
Especially in the web programming sphere, there have
been recent attempts to retrofit dynamic languages such as
PHP, JavaScript and Python with static type systems, which
often leads to idiosyncratic design choices. Dart and TypeScript sacrifice soundness of the type system to use “optimistic” type compatibility rules, in the interest of making
static types easier to use. Runtime errors are trapped by
the underlying dynamic language (Brandt 2011). Similarly
flawed type systems have appeared before, if with less pride,
for example in Java.
If we want to take the programs as proofs metaphor
seriously, not just as a theoretical construct, but as something
that can actually serve as a practical model for programming,
we need to think about ways of combining the best properties
of the various systems, or come up with altogether new ways
of supporting the modern development process.
4.4
A Speculative Evaluation Framework
For programming systems that support development all the
way from initial creation to eventual rigorous codification,
we expect supporting capabilities in two phases: discovery
and codification.
4.4.1
Discovery
The responses to Jaffe and Quinn hinted at the high diversity
of cognitive styles and approaches among mathematicians.
While ultimately mathematicians have a rigorous common
standard of communication, there is a lot of freedom for individuals to work with their preferred methods and amount
of guesswork. The degrees of freedom a technological system can provide may always need to be augmented with activities external to the system, yet programming languages
could optimize for the level of flexibility possible when already rigorously formulated parts of a software system interact with experimental parts. We define three criteria that are
likely to be useful in exploring a problem space and discovering possible solutions by enabling fumbling and blundering.
Special cases Testing a procedure by applying it to only
some special cases is irresponsible, but trying a basic idea
first on regular, then on edge cases is a time-tested heuristic
for developing the first draft of a general procedure. Considering special cases allows local and concrete reasoning in
place of contemplation of abstract generalities. A programming environment can allow programmers to run and observe partial implementations on hand-selected inputs, even
if the implementation has obvious holes that have yet to be
addressed.
Flow trumps flaw An uninterrupted flow of ideas and associations is more important than the premature attention to
flawed details. I need not work out the details of an approach
I discard after five minutes of exploration.
Today’s incarnations of rigorous languages are not very
close to absolute rigor. In most programs, there are many
properties that are not captured by the type system (list
length, effects, co-effects), and I don’t have to battle the
type checker on those dimensions. Nevertheless, there is a
variety of cases where the type checker insists on guarantees
for certain properties. The more the type system conforms
to the ideal of preventing programs from going wrong, the
more details will have to be explicitly stated and treated.
While the details need to be taken care of as the overall
picture clears up, it is important to develop a high-level
understanding and see an idea through enough to evaluate
its overall value, before investing the time to care about all
the details.
Partial execution Especially when making changes to an
existing codebase, the programmer may want to test the
changes to one part of the program, while ignoring – consciously or unconsciously – that global invariants have been
broken. The environment can allow the execution of partially
functional programs, even if there is no global coherence.
4.4.2
Codification
Discovery and experimentation are important, but so is hardening and gradual refinement towards a shared and practically verifiable standard of correctness. Not only does this
provide better means for creating reliable artifacts, but it also
is the basis for a common language to communicate ideas
and judge implementations.
Crystallization As understanding of the programming task
and software system crystallizes, the programmer should
have a clear standard of correctness to work towards, and
should constantly be supported to make the assumptions and
invariants explicit and subject to verification.
5.
Tools for Discovery
The goals and criteria described in the preceding section set
up desiderata but do not prescribe any particular solution.
A basic question that is left open, is whether we need to
think of this as strictly a programming language problem,
or whether it can be framed more broadly as a programming
system problem. The idol of mathematics presents a pattern
where the final form of rigorous proof is fixed (under adequate idealization), but any path that produces this form is
considered legal.
In program construction, the tools for experimentation,
discovery and crystallization can either be built into the language, or be available in a programming environment that
allows to eventually produce a program in a final rigorous
form, even if the language itself has no concept of imprecision. Both approaches have been explored in prior work, and
it makes sense to discuss examples viewed through the lens
of this distinction.
5.1
As Programming Language Problem
A programming language that is to support the development process from experimentation to refinement into a
well-understood, rigid form, needs to possess a powerful
type system that can capture the relevant behavioral properties, but also allows to encode and tolerate a level of indeterminacy to support the phases where the programmer is
unwilling or yet unable to formally explain their intention in
detail.
Without reference to a particular implementation strategy,
this general idea of viewing the static-to-dynamic continuum
as a language-internal problem has already been called for in
(Meijer and Drayton 2004).
Gradual Typing Gradual typing is an attempt to combine
the benefits of static and dynamic type checking, yielding
control of which parts of the program are statically checked
to the programmer. At the core, gradual type systems extend static type systems with a special dynamic type that
is similar to a global supertype (Object in Java) that also
acts as a global subtype. To prevent the type hierarchy from
collapsing under the subtyping relation, however, a new nontransitive consistency relation is introduced that allows any
type to be implicitly converted to and from dynamic. The
dynamic type can be associated with an expression either
explicitly or through omission of type information, in which
case the expression can act as any type at compile time, with
dynamic checks for each operation performed at run-time.
By supporting both approaches in the same language,
gradual typing enables programmers to evolve programs
from an implementation with only dynamically checked
types to a more predictable codebase with compile-time
correctness guarantees. As the program evolves, fragments
without static type checks can enter and be annotated repeatedly, or even remain part of the code base indefinitely.
The use of special cases is facilitated by the generous
type conversions possible in the system, but may require
manual effort on the side of the programmer. The ability
to use dynamically typed fragments is supportive of programmer flow. Partial execution is possible, but limited to
the dynamically typed fragments of a program. The presence
of a clearly defined and enforced type discipline provides a
framework for crystallization but relies on the programmer’s
discipline to make use of it.
The term gradual typing was introduced in (Siek and
Taha 2006). Recent research has been focused on improving
performance and communication of type errors (Garcia et al.
2016; Takikawa et al. 2015). Established languages that support some version of gradual typing are C#, or more recently
Dart and TypeScript.
Dependent Types The question of how much type information to extract from the programmer becomes more relevant as the expressiveness of type systems grows. In Why
Dependent Types Matter, Altenkirch et al. present a series
of refinements of merge-sort written in Epigram, a functional language with dependent types. In their words: “It is
the programmer’s choice to what degree he wants to exploit
the expressiveness of such a powerful type discipline. While
the price for formally certified software may be high, it is
good to know that we can pay it in installments and that we
are free to decide how far we want to go” (Altenkirch et al.
2005). Because of the expressive type system it is possible
to encode not just structural information about function input and output, but more complex required and guaranteed
properties for input and output – pre- and post-conditions.
As an example, a vector concatenation function may carry
the information that the length of the output vector is the
sum of the input vectors. If the compiler is unable to infer
this fact from the function definition, the programmer may
have a proof obligation on her hands! In this case, as an alternative to providing a proof of this simple fact, Epigram
allows to use a more imprecise type that will merely express
that the output vector has some length.
The ability to choose the level of detail of typings grants
programmers the power to move more or less quickly and
revisit parts of the code deserving of greater precision over
time. This helps prevent disruptions of flow, and allows
for straight-forward crystallization. It is possible to observe
execution instances for selected special cases as long as
they are permitted under the current level of type precision.
Execution of any part of the program is only possible if the
whole program compiles.
5.2
As Programming System Problem
Statically-Aided Discovery Instead of manually running
experiments on code with lacking type information, programmers can provide type information and receive automatic and direct feedback from the programming environment that may help revise and refine types and implementation.
(Dybjer et al. 2003) presents an extension to the proof
assistant Agda, that combines static and run-time analysis
by means of property-based testing to quickly identify deadends in formal proofs with high probability. In this manner,
the system user can gain confidence in the validity of her
current attempt, before potentially wasting time and energy
trying to prove some ineffable, false property. This approach
supports crystallization by reducing the time to feedback.
Flow is somewhat disrupted by switching from implementation to verification, but examples for testing are even automatically generated. Partial execution is limited to the fragment under consideration.
A similar system is described in Dynamic Witnesses for
Static Type Errors (Seidel et al. 2016), which aims to complement the abstract error messages provided by OCaml’s
type checker with problematic example inputs and an accompanying trace that illustrate the source of the error. Special cases, that is example inputs and executions, are provided only for negative cases that produce a type error. Be-
cause the tool is external to the target language and compiler, execution of partially erroneous programs and testing
with arbitrary examples is otherwise not possible. Flow is
disrupted in just the same way as with a regular compiler,
but the duration of the disruption may be decreased. There
is no added support for gradual crystallization, even while
there is a clear and enforced standard of correctness.
There is a tradition of type-directed tools for interactive
proof construction in proof assistants like Agda, Coq and
Isabelle. A graphical user interface can present the available hypotheses and open proof obligations and allow to select standard routines (tactics) to automatically proceed with
parts of the proof construction (see also Asperti et al. 2009;
Geuvers and Nederpelt 2014). The same idea can be applied
to aided program construction as suggested in (Altenkirch
et al. 2005): The environment lists the current programming
goals based on the available type information and the programmer either implements them manually or by means of a
meta-programming rule available as library code.
Instead of supporting experimental discovery, the programming environment provides support in reasoning at the
static level, gradually working towards a pre-defined and
checked type-level description of each part of the program.
The language Idris, designed for general purpose programming, has a compiler with explicit support for this style of
interactive type-directed development (Brady 2016).
Pluggable Type Systems Type disciplines can be seen as
entirely external to the programming language, in which
case there may be not one, but many static type systems
designed for a language, allowing the programmer to pick
the most appropriate one or ones. Such optional, pluggable
type systems that have no effect on language semantics were
argued for in (Bracha 2004). Because pluggable type systems are essentially analysis tools for dynamic languages, all
discovery-phase benefits for flow, special cases and partial
execution transfer unimpinged. On the other hand, type systems become more of a tool for individual developers and
there is no longer any notion of crystallization towards a
common standard of rigor.
Flexible Execution Models for Typed Languages This
category of approaches is closest to gradual typing in that
a designated type system or standard of rigor is assumed and
combined with the desire to emulate the development experience of dynamic languages. Unlike in gradual typing, however, the type system is not enriched to allow the distinction
between static and dynamic fragments of a program. Instead,
the programming environment is altered to (optionally) defer certain type checks to run-time, allowing the execution
even of provably type-incorrect programs. Execution may
fail with a trapped error if the execution path leads to an
error, or continue without failure as long as no problematic
part of the program is reached.
Always-Available Static and Dynamic Feedback (Bayne
et al. 2011) notes that “[most] statically-typed languages
embody the philosophy that an ill-typed program is of zero
value” and henceforth reject such programs. Instead, Bayne
et al. see such programs as valuable for experimentation
and want to provide feedback from both static analysis and
dynamic execution at any time.
Progress types (Politz et al. 2012), instead of giving the
programmer control over which parts of the program are disciplined by a static type system, grants control over which
type errors are to be compile-time errors, such that irrelevant
errors can be ignored until they occur at run-time. The authors seem to see this approach as compatible with the idea
of pluggable types, however the presented system is focused
on the existing run-time type system of the base language.
Liberating the Programmer with Prorogued Programming (Afshari et al. 2012) aims at creating a new programming paradigm, based around a more interactive program
creation workflow. Their approach is based around three
principles: allowing the programmer to defer implementation partially to focus on an ongoing concern; allowing the
programmer to supply appropriate values during execution;
and allowing the programmer to execute partial implementations at any time.
In all three cases, disruptions to flow are minimal, special
cases can be hand-picked, and execution can happen at will.
With the possible exception of progress types, crystallization
towards a statically-checked type discipline is an explicit
goal and can be pursued gradually. An early version of the
basic idea is described in (Cartwright and Fagan 1991).
Recent versions of the Glasgow Haskell Compiler support
the deferral of type checks to run-time (Vytiniotis et al.
2015).
6.
Conclusion
There is much work left to be done, both in working out the
details of even these speculative arguments, and if they convince, in empirical investigation of their implications. When
reading the writings of researchers, one finds references to
the popularity of so-called dynamic languages, but this often appears as a curious, brute fact, something not available
to or worthy of analysis. Even publications presenting technologies in support of the dynamic habits of programmers
seem to confine themselves to appealing to only that brute
fact, putting the blame on programmers instead of justifying
the benefits independently. To give just one example: “The
ethos of gradual typing takes for granted that programmers
choose dynamic languages for creating software” (Takikawa
et al. 2015). My hope is to convince the reader that there
is something to learn from looking at programs as proofs,
and then looking at how proofs really come about, without
falling prey to idolizing mathematics.
Looking at the two examples drawn from architecture and
urban planning we can make a distinction that may help
address a possible objection. On one side, Wittgenstein’s
work raises doubts about whether his design was guided by
the ambition to provide housing3 . On the other side, it seems
plausible (if not necessary) to believe that the architects of
modernist housing projects were in fact motivated by the
desire to provide housing. Unfortunately, this does not mean
that the results are altogether different in practice. Similarly,
my claim need not be that language designers are aiming
for a formalist paradise devoid of practical motivation. But
even if for the best intentions their design takes inspiration
from mathematics in a too simplistic manner, it may miss
important aspects and lead to similarly formalistic outcomes.
If we focus too much on making “programming an activity akin in rigour and beauty to that of proving mathematical
theorems”, while losing track of the “rather messy job of instructing this or that physically existing machine, by cunning
tricks, to perform computational tasks”, and not even paying
attention to how mathematicians really do prove mathematical theorems, we run the risk of erecting, like Wittgenstein,
a dwelling for the gods. The reality of the practitioner is not
as clean-cut and elegant as its idealization, but makes use of
a variety of mindsets, cognitive modes, and good old fudging. Coming up with an account of how the rigorous formal
systems we have conceived of can integrate with less rigid
components will be challenging, but worthwhile.
Acknowledgments
The seed of doubt was planted during my graduate studies
at the ILLC and further shaped by my work at Prezi. Andras
Slemmer’s interest prompted me to produce an elaborated
written version. Jan Martin Raasch, Ignas Vyšniauskas and
Christoph Gietl helped by discussing the written version at
various stages. The reviewers caught some of my sloppier
thinking and suggested further material and distinctions.
References
M. Afshari, E.T. Barr, and Z. Su. Liberating the programmer
with prorogued programming. In Proceedings of the ACM
international symposium on New ideas, new paradigms, and
reflections on programming and software (Onward! 2012),
ACM, New York, USA, 2012.
T. Altenkirch, C. McBride, and J. McKinna. Why dependent types
matter. 2005. http://www.cs.nott.ac.uk/~psztxa/publ/
ydtm.pdf.
A. Asperti, H. Geuvers, and R. Natarajan. Social processes,
program verification and all that. In Mathematical Structures in
Computer Science, volume 19, number 5, October 2009.
M. Atiyah et al. Responses to: A. Jaffe and F. Quinn, “Theoretical
mathematics”: Toward a cultural synthesis of mathematics and
theoretical physics. In Bulletin of the American Mathematical
Society, volume 30, number 2, April 1994.
3 It
brings to mind his metaphorical invocation of architecture: “I am not
interested in erecting a building but in having the foundations of possible
buildings transparently before me”.
M. Bayne, R. Cook, M.D. Ernst. Always-available static and
dynamic feedback. In Proceedings of the 33rd International
Conference on Software Engineering, ACM, 2011.
G. Bracha. Pluggable type systems. In OOPSLA Workshop on
Revival of Dynamic Languages, 2004.
E. Brady. Type-driven development with Idris. Manning, 2016.
E. Brandt.
Why Dart types are optional and unsound. 2011. https://www.dartlang.org/articles/
design-decisions/why-dart-types.
R. Cartwright, and M. Fagan. Soft typing. In Proceedings of
the ACM SIGPLAN 1991 conference on Programming language
design and implementation, June 24–28, 1991, Toronto, Canada.
J. Davis, and R. Hersh. The mathematical experience. Birkhäuser,
Boston, 1981.
R.A. DeMillo, R.J. Lipton, and A.J. Perlis. Social processes and
proofs of theorems and programs. In Commun. ACM, volume
22, number 5, May 1979.
P. Dybjer et al. Combining Testing and Proving in Dependent
Type Theory. In D. Basin, B. Wolff editors, Theorem Proving in
Higher Order Logics: 16th International Conference, TPHOLs
2003, Rome, Italy, September 8-12, 2003. Proceedings. Springer,
Berlin, 2003.
J. Emerich. Applying types as abstract interpretation to a
language with dynamic dispatch. Master’s thesis. University
of Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015.
R.P. Feynman. New textbooks for the “new” mathematics. In
Engineering and science, volume 28, number 6, March 1965.
R. Garcia, A.M. Clark, and E. Tanter. Abstracting gradual typing.
In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT
Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages (POPL
2016). ACM, New York.
H. Geuvers, and R. Nederpelt. Type theory and formal proof.
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014.
R. Harper.
Dynamic Languages are Static Languages.
Blog post. March 19, 2011. https:
//existentialtype.wordpress.com/2011/03/19/
dynamic-languages-are-static-languages/
R. Harper. Practical foundations for programming languages.
Cambridge University Press, 2012.
D. Hilbert. Axiomatisches Denken. In Mathematische Annalen,
volume 78, number 1, December 1917.
A. Jaffe, and F. Quinn. “Theoretical mathematics”: Toward a
cultural synthesis of mathematics and theoretical physics. In
Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, volume 29,
number 1, July 1993.
M. Kline. Logic versus pedagogy. In The American Mathematical
Monthly, volume 77, number 3, March 1970. Mathematical
Association of America, 1970.
M. Kline. Why Johnny can’t add: The failure of the new math.
Vintage Books, 1974.
P. Martin-Löf. Constructive mathematics and computer programming. In C A.R. Hoare and J. C. Shepherdson editors, Proc. of
a discussion meeting of the Royal Society of London on Mathematical logic and programming languages. Prentice-Hall, Inc.,
Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1985.
C. Mclarty. Poincaré: Mathematics & logic & intuition. In
Philosophia Mathematica, volume 5, number 2. Oxford University Press, 1997.
E.L. Seidel, R. Jhala, and W. Weimer. Dynamic witnesses for
static type errors. Electronically published on June 24, 2016:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1606.07557 (to appear in print).
E. Meijer, and P. Drayton. Static typing where possible, dynamic
typing when needed. In OOPSLA Workshop on Revival of
Dynamic Languages, 2004.
M. Senechal. The continuing silence of Bourbaki: An interview
with Pierre Cartier. In M. Senechal editor, The mathematical
intelligencer, volume 20, number 1, 1998.
C.J. Phillips. In accordance with a “more majestic order”: the
new math and the nature of mathematics at midcentury. In Isis,
volume 105, number 3, September 2014. University of Chicago
Press, 2014.
J. Siek, and W. Taha. Gradual typing for functional languages. In
TR-2006-06: Scheme and functional programming workshop,
University of Chicago, 2006.
C.J. Phillips. The new math: a political history. University of
Chicago Press, 2015.
B. Pierce. Types and programming languages. MIT Press, 2002.
J.H. Poincaré. Intuition and logic in mathematics. In W.B. Ewald
editor, From Kant to Hilbert, volume 2. Oxford University Press,
2005.
J.G. Politz, H. Quay-de la Vallee, S. Krishnamurthi. Progressive
types. In Proceedings of the ACM international symposium on
new ideas, new paradigms, and reflections on programming and
software (Onward! 2012), ACM, New York, USA, 2012.
G. Sussman. Video recording. Electronically published on January
11, 2016: https://vimeo.com/151465912#t=59m36s.
A. Takikawa et al. Towards practical gradual typing. In John Tang
Boyland editor, 29th European Conference on Object-Oriented
Programming (ECOOP 2015), volume 37. Schloss Dagstuhl,
2015.
D. Vytiniotis, S.P. Jones, and J.P. Magalhães. Equality proofs and
deferred type errors: a compiler pearl. In Proceedings of the
17th ACM SIGPLAN international conference on Functional
programming (ICFP 12), ACM, New York, USA.
P. Wadler. Propositions as types. In Communications of the ACM,
volume 58, number 12, December 2015.
| 6cs.PL
|
Real-time Hand Tracking under Occlusion from an Egocentric RGB-D Sensor
Franziska Mueller1
Srinath Sridhar1
arXiv:1704.02201v2 [cs.CV] 5 Oct 2017
1
Dushyant Mehta1
Dan Casas2
Max-Planck-Institute for Informatics, Germany
2
Oleksandr Sotnychenko1
Christian Theobalt1
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Spain
Abstract
We present an approach for real-time, robust and accurate hand pose estimation from moving egocentric RGB-D
cameras in cluttered real environments. Existing methods typically fail for hand-object interactions in cluttered
scenes imaged from egocentric viewpoints—common for
virtual or augmented reality applications. Our approach
uses two subsequently applied Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) to localize the hand and regress 3D joint
locations. Hand localization is achieved by using a CNN
to estimate the 2D position of the hand center in the input,
even in the presence of clutter and occlusions. The localized
hand position, together with the corresponding input depth
value, is used to generate a normalized cropped image that
is fed into a second CNN to regress relative 3D hand joint
locations in real time. For added accuracy, robustness and
temporal stability, we refine the pose estimates using a kinematic pose tracking energy. To train the CNNs, we introduce a new photorealistic dataset that uses a merged reality
approach to capture and synthesize large amounts of annotated data of natural hand interaction in cluttered scenes.
Through quantitative and qualitative evaluation, we show
that our method is robust to self-occlusion and occlusions
by objects, particularly in moving egocentric perspectives.
Figure 1: We present an approach to track the full 3D pose
of the hand from egocentric viewpoints (left), a challenging
problem due to additional self-occlusions, occlusions from
objects and background clutter. Our method can reliably
track the hand in 3D even under such conditions using only
RGB-D input. Here we show tracking results overlaid with
color and depth map (center), and visualized from virtual
viewpoints (right).
tion with model-based hand tracking, have been shown to
work well for static, third-person viewpoints in uncluttered
scenes [39, 29, 18], i.e., mostly for free hand motion in midair, a setting that is uncommon in natural hand interaction.
However, real-time hand pose estimation from moving,
first-person camera viewpoints in cluttered real-world
scenes where the hand is often occluded as it naturally interacts with objects, remains an unsolved problem. We
define first-person or egocentric viewpoints as those that
would typically be imaged by cameras mounted on the
head (for VR/AR applications), shoulder, or chest (see Figure 1). Occlusions, cluttered backgrounds, manipulated objects, and field-of-view limitations make this scenario particularly challenging. CNNs are a promising method to
tackle this problem but typically require large amounts of
annotated data which is hard to obtain since markerless
hand tracking (even with multiple views), and manual annotation on a large scale is infeasible in egocentric settings due to (self-)occlusions, cost, and time. Even semiautomatic annotation approaches [17] would fail if large
parts of the hand are occluded. Photorealistic synthetic data,
1. Introduction
Estimating the full articulated 3D pose of hands is becoming increasingly important due to the central role that
hands play in everyday human activities. Applications
in activity recognition [26], motion control [47], human–
computer interaction [30], and virtual/augmented reality
(VR/AR) require real-time and accurate hand pose estimation under challenging conditions. Spurred by recent developments in commodity depth sensing, several methods
that use a single RGB-D camera have been proposed [38,
31, 35, 22, 4, 42]. In particular, methods that use Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), possibly in combina1
on the other hand, is inexpensive, easier to obtain, removes
the need for manual annotation, and can produce accurate
ground truth even under occlusion.
In this paper, we present, to our knowledge, the first
method that supports real-time egocentric hand pose estimation in real scenes with cluttered backgrounds, occlusions, and complex hand-object interactions using a single
commodity RGB-D camera. We divide the task of perframe hand pose estimation into: (1) hand localization, and
(2) 3D joint location regression. Hand localization, an important task in the presence of scene clutter, is achieved by
a CNN that estimates the 2D image location of the center
of the hand. Further processing results in an image-level
bounding box around the hand and the 3D location of the
hand center (or of the occluding object directly in front of
the center). This output is fed into a second CNN that regresses the relative 3D locations of the 21 hand joints. Both
CNNs are trained with large amounts of fully annotated
data which we obtain by combining hand-object interactions with real cluttered backgrounds using a new merged
reality approach. This increases the realism of the training
data since users can perform motions to mimic manipulating a virtual object using live feedback of their hand pose.
These motions are rendered from novel egocentric views using a framework that photorealistically models RGB-D data
of hands in natural interaction with objects and clutter.
The 3D joint location predictions obtained from the
CNN are accurate but suffer from kinematic inconsistencies
and temporal jitter expected in single frame pose estimation methods. To overcome this, we refine the estimated 3D
joint locations using a fast inverse kinematics pose tracking energy that uses 3D and 2D joint location constraints
to estimate the joint angles of a temporally smooth skeleton. Together, this results in the first real-time approach for
smooth and accurate hand tracking even in cluttered scenes
and from moving egocentric viewpoints. We show the accuracy, robustness, and generality of our approach on a new
benchmark dataset with moving egocentric cameras in real
cluttered environments. In sum, our contributions are:
• A novel method that localizes the hand and estimates,
in real time, the 3D joint locations from egocentric
viewpoints, in clutter, and under strong occlusions using two CNNs. A kinematic pose tracking energy further refines the pose by estimating joint angles of a
temporally smooth tracking.
• A photorealistic data generation framework for synthesizing large amounts of annotated RGB-D training data
of hands in natural interaction with objects and clutter.
• Extensive evaluation on our new annotated real benchmark dataset EgoDexter featuring egocentric cluttered
scenes and interaction with objects.
2. Related work
Hand pose estimation has a rich history due to its applications in human–computer interaction, motion control
and activity recognition. However, most previous work estimates hand pose in mid-air and in uncluttered scenes with
third-person viewpoints, making occlusions less of an issue. We first review the prior art for this simpler setting
(free hand tracking) followed by a discussion of work in the
harder hand-object and egocentric settings.
Free Hand Tracking: Many approaches for free hand
tracking resort to multiple RGB cameras to overcome selfocclusions and achieve high accuracy [33, 1, 44]. However,
single depth or RGB-D cameras are preferred since multiple cameras are cumbersome to setup and use. Methods that
use generative pose tracking have been successful for free
hand tracking with only an RGB-D stream [19, 22, 35, 37].
However, these approaches fail under typical fast motions,
and occlusions due to objects and clutter. To overcome
this, most recent approaches rely solely on learning-based
methods or combine them with generative pose tracking.
Random forests are a popular choice [12, 36, 34, 45, 43]
due to their capacity but still result in kinematically inconsistent and jittery pose estimates. Many methods overcome this limitation through combination with a generative pose tracking strategy [31, 22, 38]. All of the above
approaches fail to work under occlusions arising from objects and scene clutter. Recent deep learning methods
promise large learning capacities for hand pose estimation [39, 4, 29, 48, 46, 18]. However, generating enough examples for supervised training remains a challenge. Commercial systems that claim to work for egocentric viewpoints [14] fail under large occlusions, see Section 6.
Hand Tracking under Challenging Conditions: Hand
pose estimation under challenging scene, background,
and camera conditions different from third-person mid-air
tracking remains an unsolved problem. Some methods can
track hands even when they interact with objects [6, 27], but
they are limited to slow motions and limited articulation.
A method for real-time joint tracking of hands and objects
from third-person viewpoints was recently proposed [32],
but is limited to known objects and small occlusions. Methods for capturing complex hand-object interactions and object scanning were proposed [20, 1, 13, 41, 40, 21]. However, these are offline methods and their performance in
egocentric cluttered scenarios is unknown.
Using egocentric cameras for human performance capture has gained attention due to ready availability of consumer wearable cameras [23]. Sridhar et al. [31] showed
a working example of real-time egocentric tracking in uncluttered scenes. Rogez et al. [24, 25] presented one of the
first methods to achieve this in cluttered scenes with natural hand-object interactions pioneering the use of synthetic
images for training a machine learning approach for diffi-
Figure 2: Overview: Starting from an RGB-D frame, we initially regress the 2D hand position heatmap using our CNN
HALNet and compute a cropped frame. A second CNN, JORNet, is used to predict root-relative 3D joint positions as well as
2D joint heatmaps. Both CNNs are trainned with our new SynthHands dataset. Finally, we use a pose tracking step to obtain
the joint angles of a kinematic skeleton.
cult egocentric views. However, this work was not meant
for real-time tracking. We introduce an approach to leverage large amounts of synthetic training data to achieve realtime, temporally consistent hand tracking, even under challenging occlusion conditions.
3. Overview
Our goal is to estimate the full 3D articulated pose of
the hand imaged with a single commodity RGB-D sensor.
We use the RGB and depth channels from the Intel RealSense SR300 [8], both with a resolution of 640×480 pixels and captured at 30 Hz. We formulate hand pose estimation as an energy minimization problem that incorporates
per-frame pose estimates into a temporal tracking framework. The goal is to find the joint angles of a kinematic
hand skeleton (Section 3.1) that best represent the input observation. Similar strategies have been shown to be successful in state-of-the-art methods [38, 31, 32, 22] that use
per-frame pose estimation to initialize a tracker that refines
and regularizes the joint angles of a kinematic skeleton for
free hand tracking. However, the per-frame pose estimation
components of these methods struggle under strong occlusions, hand-object interactions, scene clutter, and moving
egocentric cameras. We overcome this limitation by combining a CNN-based 3D pose regression framework, that is
tailored for this challenging setting, with a kinematic skeleton tracking strategy for temporally stable results.
We divide the task of hand pose estimation into several
subtasks (Figure 2). First, hand localization (Section 4.1) is
achieved by a CNN that estimates an image-level heatmap
(that encodes position probabilities) of the root — a point
which is either the hand center (knuckle of the middle finger, shown with a star shape in Figure 3a) or a point on
an object that occludes the hand center. The 2D and 3D
root positions are used to extract a normalized cropped im-
age of the hand. Second, 3D joint regression (Section 4.2)
achieved with a CNN that regresses root-relative 3D joint
locations from the cropped hand image. Both CNNs are
trained with large amounts of annotated data which were
generated with a novel framework to automatically generate
3D hand joint motion with natural hand interaction (Section
4.4). Finally, the regressed 3D joint positions are used in
a kinematic pose tracking framework (Section 5) to obtain
temporally smooth tracking of the hand motion.
3.1. Hand Model
To ensure a consistent representation for both joint locations (predicted by the CNNs) and joint angles (optimized
during tracking), we use a kinematic skeleton. As shown
in Figure 3, we model the hand using a hierarchy of bones
(gray lines) and joints (circles). The 3D joint locations are
used as constraints in a kinematic pose tracking step that estimates temporally smooth joint angles of a kinematic skeleton. In our implementation, we use a kinematic skeleton
with 26 degrees of freedom (DOF), which includes 6 for
global translation and rotation, and 20 joint angles, stored
in a vector Θ, as shown in Figure 3b. To fit users with different hand shapes and sizes, we perform a quick calibration
step to fix the length of the bones for different users.
4. Single Frame 3D Pose Regression
The goal of 3D pose regression is to estimate the 3D joint
locations of the hand at each frame of the RGB-D input. To
achieve this, we first create a colored depth map D, from the
raw input produced by commodity RGB-D cameras (e.g.,
Intel RealSense SR300). We define D as
D = colormap(R, G, B, Z),
(1)
where colormap(·) is a function, that depends on the camera calibration parameters, to map each pixel in the color
(a) Global 3D positions
(b) Kinematic skeleton
Figure 3: We use two different, but consistent, representations to model the hands. Our 3D joint regression step
outputs J = 21 global 3D joint locations, shown in (a) in
green, which are later used to estimate the joint angles of a
kinematic skeleton hand model, shown in (b). The orange
star depicts the joint used as a hand root.
image plane onto the depth map Z. Computing D allows
us to ignore camera-specific variations in extrinsic parameters. We also downsample D to a resolution of 320×240
to aid real-time performance. We next describe our pose
regression approach that is robust even in challenging cluttered scenes with notable (self-)occlusions of the hand. As
we show in the evaluation (Section 6), using a two step
approach to first localize the hand in full-frame input and
subsequently estimate 3D pose outperforms using a single
CNN for both tasks.
4.1. Hand Localization
The goal of the first part of pose regression is to localize
the hand in challenging cluttered input frames resulting in a
bounding box around the hand and 3D root location. Given
a colored depth map D, we compute
e = imcrop(D, HR ),
D
(2)
where HR is a heatmap encoding the position probability of
the 2D hand root and imcrop(·) is a function that crops
the hand area of the input frame. In particular, we estimate HR using a CNN which we call HALNet (HAnd Localization Net). The imcrop(·) function picks the imagelevel heatmap maximum location φ(HR ) = (u, v) and uses
the associated depth z in D to compute a depth-dependent
crop, the side length of which is inversely proportional to
the depth and contains the hand. Additionally, imcrop(·)
also normalizes the depth component of the cropped image
by subtracting z from all pixels.
HALNet uses an architecture derived from ResNet50 [7]
which has been shown to have a good balance between accuracy and computational cost [2]. We reduced the number of residual blocks to 10 to achieve real-time framerate
while maintaining high accuracy. We train this network using SynthHands, a new photorealistic dataset with ample
variance across many dimensions such as hand pose, skin
color, objects, hand-object interaction and shading details.
See Sections 4.3 and 4.4, and the supplementary document
for training and architecture details.
Post Processing: To make the root maximum location robust over time, we add an additional step to prevent outliers
from affecting 3D joint location estimates. We maintain a
history of maxima locations and label them as confident or
uncertain based on the following criterion. If the likelihood
value of the heatmap maximum at a frame t is < 0.1 and
it occurs at > 30 pixels from the previous maximum then it
is marked as uncertain. If a maximum location is uncertain,
we update it as
φt = φt−1 + δ k
φc−1 − φc−2
,
||φc−1 − φc−2 ||
(3)
where φt = φ(HRt ) is the updated 2D maximum location at
the frame t, φc−1 is the last confident maximum location,
k is the number of frames elapsed since the last confident
maximum, and δ is a decay factor to progressively downweight uncertain maxima. We empirically set δ = 0.98 and
use this value in all our results.
4.2. 3D Joint Regression
e that
Starting from a cropped and normalized input D
contains a hand, potentially partially occluded, our goal is
to regress the global 3D hand joint position vector pG ∈
R3×J . We use a CNN, referred to as JORNet (JOint Regression Net), to predict per-joint 3D root-relative positions
e Additionally, JORNet also regresses
pL ∈ R3×J in D.
per-joint 2D position likelihood heatmaps H = {Hj }Jj=1 ,
which will be used to regularize the predicted 3D joint positions in a later step. We obtain global 3D joint positions
L
pG
j = pj +r, where r is the global position of the hand center (or a point on an occluder) obtained by backprojecting
the 2.5D hand root position (u, v, z) to 3D. JORNet uses the
same architecture as HALNet and is trained with the same
data. See Sections 4.3 and 4.4 for training details, and the
supplementary document for architecture details.
4.3. SynthHands Dataset
Supervised learning methods, including CNNs, require
large amounts of training data in order to learn all the variation exhibited in real hand motion. Fully annotated real data
would be ideal for this purpose but it is time consuming to
manually annotate data and annotation quality may not always be good [17]. To circumvent this problem, existing
methods [24, 25] have used synthetic data. Despite the advances made, existing datasets are constrained in a number
of ways: they typically show unnatural mid-air motions, no
Figure 4: Our SynthHands dataset is created by posing a
photorealistic hand model with real hand motion data. Virtual objects are incorporated into the 3D scenario. To allow
data augmentation, we output object foreground and scene
background appearance as a constant plain color (top row),
which are composed with shading details and randomized
textures in a postprocessing step (bottom row).
Figure 5: Our SynthHands dataset has accurate annotated
data of a hand interacting with objects. We use a merged
reality framework to track a real hand, where all joint positions are annotated, interacting with a virtual object (top).
Synthetic images are rendered with chroma key-ready colors, enabling data augmentation by composing the rendered
hand with varying object texture and real cluttered backgrounds (bottom).
complex hand-object interactions, and do not model realistic background clutter and noise.
We propose a new dataset, SynthHands, that combines
real captured hand motion (retargeted to a virtual hand
model) with natural backgrounds and virtual objects to sample all important dimensions of variability at previously unseen granularity. It captures the variations in natural hand
motion such as pose, skin color, shape, texture, background
clutter, camera viewpoint, and hand-object interactions. We
now highlight some of the unique features of this dataset
that make it ideal for supervised training of learning-based
methods.
Natural Hand Motions: Instead of using static hand
poses [25], we captured real, non-occluded, hand motion
in mid-air from a third-person viewpoint, with a state-ofthe-art real-time markerless tracker [31]. These motions
were subsequently re-targeted onto a photorealistic synthetic hand rigged by an artist. Because we pose the synthetic hand using the captured hand motion, it mimics real
hand motions and increases dataset realism.
Hand Shape and Color: Hand shape and skin color exhibit large variation across users. To simulate real world
diversity, SynthHands contains skin textures randomly sampled from 12 different skin tones. We also sample variation
in other anatomical features (e.g., male hands are typically
bigger and may contain more hair) in the data. Finally, we
model hand shape variation by randomly applying a scaling
parameter β ∈ [0.8, 1.2] along each dimension of a default
hand mesh.
Egocentric Viewpoint: Synthetic data has the unique advantage that we can render from arbitrary camera viewpoints. In order to support difficult egocentric views, we
setup 5 virtual cameras that mimic different egocentric perspectives. The virtual cameras generate RGB-D images
from this perspective while also simulating sensor noise and
camera calibration parameters.
Hand-Object Interactions:
We realistically simulate
hand-object interactions by using a merged reality approach
to track real hand motion interacting with virtual objects.
We achieve this by leveraging the real-time capability of existing hand tracking solutions [31] to show the user’s hand
interacting with a virtual on-screen object. Users perform
motions such as object grasping and manipulation, thus
simulating real hand-object interactions (see Figure 5).
Object Shape and Appearance: SynthHands contains interactions with a total of 7 different virtual objects in various locations, rotations and scale configurations. To enable
augmentation of the object appearance to increase dataset
variance, we render the object albedo (i.e., pink in Figure
12) and shading layers separately. We use chroma keying
to replace the pink object albedo with a texture randomly
sampled from a set of 145 textures and combining it with
the shading image. Figure 12 shows some examples of the
data before and after augmentation. Importantly, note that
SynthHands does not contain 3D scans of the real test objects nor 3D models of similar objects used for evaluation in
Section 6. This demonstrates that our approach generalizes
to unseen objects.
Real Backgrounds: Finally, we simulate cluttered scenes
and backgrounds by compositing the synthesized handobject images with real RGB-D captures of real backgrounds, including everyday desktop scenarios, offices, corridors and kitchens. We use chroma keying to replace the
default background (green in Figure 12) with the captured
backgrounds.
Our data generation framework is built using the Unity
Game Engine and uses a rigged hand model distributed by
Leap Motion [14]. In total, SynthHands contains roughly
220,000 RGB-D images exhibiting large variation seen in
natural hands and interactions. Please see the supplementary document for more information and example images.
4.4. Training
Both HALNet and JORNet are trained on the SynthHands
dataset using the Caffe framework [10], and the AdaDelta
solver with a momentum of 0.9 and weight decay factor
of 0.0005. The learning rate is tapered down from 0.05
to 0.000025 during the course of the training. For training JORNet, we used the ground truth (u, v) and z of the
hand root to create the normalized crop input. To improve
robustness, we also add uniform noise (∈ [−25, 25] mm)
to the backprojected 3D root position in the SynthHands
dataset. We trained HALNet for 45,000 iterations and JORNet for 60,000 iterations. The final networks were chosen
as the ones with the lowest loss values. The layers in our
networks that are similar to ResNet50 are initialized with
weights of the original ResNet50 architecture trained on ImageNet [28]. For the other layers, we initialize the weights
randomly. For details of the loss weights used and the taper
scheme, please see the supplementary document.
5. Hand Pose Optimization
The estimated per-frame global 3D joint positions pG
are not guaranteed to be temporally smooth nor do they
have consistent inter-joint distances (i.e., bone lengths) over
time. We mitigate this by fitting a kinematic skeleton parameterized by joint angles Θ, shown in Figure 3b, to the
regressed 3D joint positions. Additionally, we refine the fitting by leveraging the 2D heatmap output from JORNet as
an additional contraint and regularize it using joint limit and
smoothness constraints. In particular, we seek to minimize
E(Θ) = Edata (Θ, pG , H) + Ereg (Θ),
(4)
where Edata is the data term that incorporates both the 3D
positions and 2D heatmaps
Edata (Θ, pG , H) = wp3 Epos3D (Θ, pG ) + wp2 Epos2D (Θ, H).
(5)
The first term Epos3D minimizes the 3D distance between
each predicted joint location pG
j and its corresponding position M(Θ)j in the kinematic skeleton set to pose Θ
Epos3D (Θ) =
J
X
j=1
2
||M(Θ)j − pG
j ||2 .
(6)
The second data term, Epos2D , minimizes the 2D distance
between each joint heatmap maximum φ(Hj ) and the projected 2D location of the corresponding joint in the kinematic skeleton
Epos2D (Θ) =
J
X
||π(M(Θ)j ) − φ(Hj ))||22 ,
(7)
j=1
where π projects the joint onto the image plane. We empirically tuned the weights for the different terms as: wp3 =
0.01 and wp2 = 5 × 10−7 .
We regularize the data terms by enforcing joint limits and
temporal smoothness constraints
Ereg (Θ) = wl Elim (Θ) + wt Etemp (Θ)
(8)
where
0
X
Elim (Θ) =
(θi − θil )2
θi ∈Θ (θ u − θ )2
i
i
, if θil ≤ θi ≤ θiu
, if θi < θil
, if θi > θiu
(9)
is a soft prior to enforce biomechanical pose plausibility,
with Θl , Θu being the lower and upper joint angle limits,
respectively, and
Etemp (Θ) = ||∇Θ − ∇Θ(t−1) ||22
(10)
enforces constant velocity to prevent dramatic pose
changes. We empirically chose weights for the regularizers
as: wl = 0.03 and wt = 10−3 . We optimize our objective
using 20 iterations of conditioned gradient descent.
6. Results and Evaluation
We conducted several experiments to evaluate our
method and different components of it. To facilitate evaluation, we captured a new benchmark dataset EgoDexter consisting of 3190 frames of natural hand interactions with objects in real cluttered scenes, moving egocentric viewpoints,
complex hand-object interactions, and natural lighting. Of
these, we manually annotated 1485 frames using an annotation tool to mark 2D and 3D fingertip positions, a common approach used in free hand tracking [1, 33]. In total we gathered 4 sequences (Rotunda, Desk, Kitchen,
Fruits) featuring 4 different users (2 female), skin color
variation, background variation, different objects, and camera motion. Note that the objects in EgoDexter are distinct
from the objects in the SynthHands training data to show the
ability of our approach to generalize. In addition, to enable
evaluation of the different components of our method, we
also held out a test set consisting of 5120 fully annotated
frames from the SynthHands dataset.
Component Evaluation: We first analyze the performance
of HALNet and JORNet on the synthetic test set. The main
Figure 6: Comparison of 2D (left) and 3D (right) error of
the joint position estimates of JORNet. JORNet was initialized with either the ground truth (GT, blue) or with the
proposed hand localization step (HL, orange). We observe
that HL initialization does not substantially reduce the performance of JORNet. As expected, fingertips-only errors
(dashed lines) are higher than the errors for all joints.
goal of HALNet is to accurately localize the 2D position of
the root (which either lies on the hand or on an occluder
in front) accurately. We thus use 2D Euclidean pixel error between the ground truth root position and the predicted
position as the evaluation metric. On average, HALNet produces an error of 2.2 px with a standard deviation of 1.5 px
on the test set. This low average error ensures that we always obtain reliable crops for JORNet.
To evaluate JORNet, we use the 3D Euclidean distance
between ground truth joint positions (of all hand joints) and
the predicted position as the error metric. For comparison,
we also report the errors for only the 3D fingertip positions
which are a stricter measure of performance. Since the output of JORNet is dependent on the crop estimated in the
hand localization step, we evaluate two conditions: (1) using ground truth crops, (2) using crops from the hand localization step. This helps evaluate how hand localization
affects the final joint positions. Figure 6 shows the percentage of the test set that produces a certain 2D or 3D error
for all joints and fingertips only. For 3D error, we see that
using ground truth (GT) crops is better than using the crops
from the hand localization (HL). The difference is not substantial which shows that the hand localization step does not
lead to catastrophic failures of JORNet. For 2D error, however, we observe that JORNet initialized with HL results
in marginally better accuracy. We hypothesize that this is
because JORNet is trained on noisy root positions (Section
4.4) while the ground truth lacks any such noise.
CNN Structure Evaluation: We now show that, on our
real annotated benchmark EgoDexter, our approach that
uses two subsequently applied CNNs is better than a single
CNN to directly regress joint positions in cluttered scenes.
We trained a CNN with the same architecture as JORNet
but with the task of directly regressing 3D joint positions
from full frame RGB-D images which often have large occlusions and scene clutter. In Figure 7, we show the 3D
Figure 7: Comparison of our two-step RGB-D CNN architecture, the corresponding depth-only version and a single
combined CNN which is trained to directly regress global
3D pose. Our proposed approach achieves the best performance on the real test sequences.
Figure 8: Ablative analysis of the proposed kinematic pose
tracking on our real annotated dataset EgoDexter (average
fingertip error). Using only the 2D fitting energy leads to
catastrophic tracking failure on all sequences. The version
restricted to the 3D fitting term achieves a similar error as
the raw 3D predictions while it ensures biomechanical plausibility and temporal smoothness. Our full formulation that
combines 2D as well as 3D terms yields the lowest error.
fingertip error plot for this CNN (single RGB-D) which is
worse that our two-step approach. This shows that learning to directly regress 3D pose in cluttered scenes with occlusion is a harder task, which our approach simplifies by
breaking it into two steps.
Input Data Evaluation: We next show, on our EgoDexter dataset, that using both RGB and depth input (RGB-D)
is superior to using only depth, even when using both our
CNNs. Figure 7 compares the 3D fingertip error of a variant of our two-step approach trained with only depth data.
We hypothesize that additional color cues help our approach
perform significantly better.
Gain of Kinematic Model: Figure 8 shows an ablative
analysis of our energy terms as well as the effect of kinematic pose tracking on the final pose estimate. Because we
Rotunda
Desk
Fruits
Kitchen
Figure 9: Qualitative results on our real annotated test sequences from the EgoDexter benchmark dataset. The results overlayed on the input images and the corresponding 3D view from a virtual viewpoint (bottom row) show that our approach is
able to handle complex object interactions, strong self-occlusions and a variety of users and backgrounds.
enforce joint angle limits, temporal smoothness, and consistent bone lengths, our combined approach produces the
lowest average error of 32.6 mm.
We were unable to quantitatively evaluate on the only
other existing egocentric hand dataset [25] due to a different sensor unsupported by our approach. To aid qualitative comparison, we include similar reenacted scenes, background clutter, and hand motion in the supplemental document and video.
Qualitative Results: Figure 9 shows qualitative results
from our approach which works well for challenging real
world scenes with clutter, hand-object interactions, and different hand shapes. We also show that a commercial solution (LeapMotion Orion) does not work well under severe
occlusions caused by objects, see Figure 10 right. We refer
to the supplemental document for results on how existing
third person methods fail on EgoDexter and how our approach in fact generalizes to third person views.
Runtime Performance: Our entire method runs in realtime on an Intel Xeon E5-2637 CPU (3.5 GHz) with an
Nvidia Titan X (Pascal). Hand localization takes 11 ms,
3D joint regression takes 6 ms, and kinematic pose tracking
takes 1 ms.
Limitations: Our method works well even in challenging egocentric viewpoints and notable occlusions. However,
there are some failure cases which are shown in Figure 10.
Please see the supplemental document for a more detailed
discussion of failure cases. We used large amounts of synthetic data for training our CNNs and simulated sensor noise
for a specific camera preventing generalization. In the future, we would like to explore the application of deep domain adaptation [3] which offers a way to jointly make use
of labeled synthetic data together with unlabeled or partially
labeled real data.
Figure 10: Fast motion that leads to misalignment in the
colored depth image or failures in the hand localization step
can lead to incorrect predictions (left two columns). LeapMotion Orion fails under large occlusions (right).
7. Conclusion
We have presented a method for hand pose estimation
in challenging first-person viewpoints with large occlusions
and scene clutter. Our method uses two CNNs to localize
and estimate, in real time, the 3D joint locations of the hand.
A pose tracking energy further refines the pose by estimating the joint angles of a kinematic skeleton for temporal
smoothness. To train the CNNs, we presented SynthHands,
a new photorealistic dataset that uses a merged reality approach to capture natural hand interactions, hand shape,
size and color variations, object occlusions, and background
variations from egocentric viewpoints. We also introduce a
new benchmark dataset EgoDexter that contains annotated
sequences of challenging cluttered scenes as seen from egocentric viewpoints. Quantitative and qualitative evaluation
shows that our approach is capable of achieving low errors
and consistent performance even under difficult occlusions,
scene clutter, and background changes.
Acknowledgements: This work was supported by the ERC
Starting Grant CapReal (335545). Dan Casas was supported by a Marie Curie Individual Fellow, grant 707326.
Appendix
This appendix includes additional experiments (Section A), details about our new synthetic dataset SynthHands
(Section B), and information about our custom CNN architecture and training procedure (Section C). We also refer to
our supplemental video1 for more visual results.
A. Evaluation
In this section, we show additional experiments and
comparisons of our method.
Improvement by Combining 2D and 3D Predictions:
Figure 13 qualitative depicts the predicted joints by each
of the key components of our pipeline — 2D predictions,
3D predictions, and final tracked skeleton — on the test sequence Fruits. Note that the modes of failure for the
2D and 3D predictions are different which leads to accurate
skeleton tracking even if one kind of prediction is incorrect.
Thus, the combination of 2D and 3D predictions with the
tracking framework consistently produces the best results.
Comparisons to the State of the Art: We were unable to
quantitatively evaluate on the only other existing egocentric
hand dataset [25] due to a different sensor currently unsupported by our approach. Using our method with the Senz3D
camera requires adaptation of intrinsic camera parameters
and noise characteristics for training. However, to provide
a visual comparison to evaluate our method, we recorded
sequences that mimic sequences used by Rogez et al. [25],
and show qualitative evaluation in Figure 14 and in the supplementary video. Our method achieves significantly more
accurate hand tracking, while running in real time.
To show the completely different nature of our problem
which cannot be solved by employing state-of-the-art methods for hand tracking in free air, we applied the method of
Sridhar et al. [31] to our real test sequences from EgoDexter. Figure 16 demonstrates catastrophic failures of the
aforementioned approach. On the other hand, Figure 15 and
the supplemental video show how our method successfully
tracks sequences mimicked from the work of Sridhar et al.
We achieve comparable results, with improved stability of
the hand root position.
Performance on 3rd-Person Viewpoint: Even though
the machine learning components of our method were only
trained on our egocentric dataset SynthHands, Figure 17
demonstrates the generalizability to 3rd-person views. Note
that the hand localization step is robust to other skin-colored
parts, like faces, in the input.
Analysis of Failure Cases: Despite the demonstrated success of our approach, we still suffer from limitations that
produce erroneous tracking results. Figure 18 depicts the results from several intermediate steps of our method in case
1 http://handtracker.mpi-inf.mpg.de/projects/OccludedHands/
of failure. In particular, we show errors due to extreme self
occlusions, severe hand and object occlusions, and when the
hand is located out of the camera field of view.
B. SynthHands Dataset
Table 1 shows the modes of variation in the SynthHands
dataset. Representative frames are shown in Figure 12.
C. CNN Architecture and Training
In this section, we explain the network architecture used
for HALNet and JORNet and provide training details. Furthermore, we present experiments which lead to our specific
design decisions.
C.1. Network Design
The ResNet[7] architecture has been successfully used
for full body pose estimation in previous work [16]. While
ResNet50 offers a good tradeoff between speed and accuracy, hand motion is fast and exhibits rapid directional
changes. Further, the egocentric camera placement leads to
even faster relative motion in the scene. Therefore, we experimented based on recent investigations into the nature of
representations learned by ResNets [5] to get a faster architecture without significantly affecting the accuracy.
Core Architecture: Starting from ResNet50, we remove a
residual block from level 3, and keep only 4 residual blocks
at level 4. Level 5 is replaced with two 3 × 3 convolution
layers with 512 (conv4e) and 256 (conv4f) features and no
striding. Both of these layers also use batch normalization
[9]. From conv4f, A 3 × 3 convolutional stub followed by
bilinear upsampling produces the joint location heatmaps,
and a fully-connected layer with 200 nodes followed by anTable 1: SynthHands Details
Mode of Variation
Pose
Wrist+Arm
Rotation
Shape
Skin Color
Camera Viewpoints
Object Shapes
Object Textures
Background Clutter
Amount of Variation
63,530 frames of real hand motion,
sampled every 5th frame
wrist: sampled from 70 deg. range
arm: sampled from a 180 deg. range
x, y, z scale sampled uniformly in
[0.8, 1.2]; female + male mesh
2 x 6 hand textures (female/male)
5 egocentric viewpoints
7 objects
145 textures
10,000 real images, uniform random
u,v offset in [-100, 100]
other fully-connected layer predict the joint location vector.
See Figure 19 for details.
Average 3D Error (mm)
50
C.2. Training Details
JORNet
JORNet light
40
30
20
10
0
Wrist Thumb Index Middle Ring
tips in 3D on the SynthHands test set. The full JORNet
version yields a significant increase in performance compared to JORNet light which was only trained for wrist and
fingertips.
Little
Figure 11: Training JORNet to regress heatmaps and local
joint positions for all joints instead of only for fingertips
and the wrist (JORNet light) reduces the error on the SynthHands test set.
The resulting architecture needs 10 ms for a forward pass
at resolution 320 x 240 (HALNet) and 6 ms at resolution 128
x 128 (JORNET) on a Nvidia Pascal Titan X GPU. This is
a significant speed-up compared to the ResNet50 version
which needs 18 ms and 11 ms, respectively. Evaluation
on the SynthHands test set shows that the drop in accuracy
is only marginal. ResNet50 trained on the hand localization task achieves 2.1 px average error whereas HALNet
achieves 2.2 px.
Intermediate Supervision: For HALNet and JORNet, we
treat a subset of the feature maps at each of res3a, res4a
and conv4e in the networks as the predicted heatmaps, for
intermediate supervision [15]. For JORNet, we additionally
use the feature maps at the aforementioned stages to predict
joint positions for intermediate supervision (see Figure 19).
Auxiliary Task in HALNet: Predicting heatmaps for all
joints as auxiliary task helps HALNet to learn the structure
of the hand. This leads to a better performance compared
to a version only trained to regress the root heatmap. On
the SynthHands test set, regressing heatmaps for all joints
instead of only for the root improves the 2D pixel error by
6.4% (from 2.35 px to 2.2 px).
Regressing All Joints in JORNet: Although fingertips and
wrist location alone provide a strong constraint for the pose
of the hand, training JORNet to regress the heatmaps and
local 3D positions for all joints improves the accuracy. Figure 11 shows the average error for the wrist and all finger-
We use the Caffe [11] framework for training our networks, using the AdaDelta scheme with momentum set to
0.9 and weight decay to 0.005. Both networks are trained
with an input batch size of 16. For HALNet, we use a base
learning rate of 0.05 and train for 45k iterations. The input has a spatial resolution of 320x240 px, and the output
heatmaps have a resolution of 40x30 px. The main heatmap
loss has a loss weight of 1.0, and all intermediate heatmap
losses have loss weights of 0.5. For JORNet, the input has
a spatial resolution of 128x128 px. We train with a base
learning rate of 0.05, with main heatmap loss weight set at
1.0 and joint position loss weight at 2500. The intermediate heatmap losses have their loss weights set to 0.5 and
intermediate joint position loss weights set to 1250. After
45k iterations, the base learning rate is lowered to 0.01, the
intermediate heatmap loss weights lowered to 0.1 and the
intermediate joint position loss weights lowered to 250, and
trained for a further 15k iterations.
Figure 12: An example set of random samples taken from our SynthHands dataset. See Table 1 for description of dataset
variability.
Figure 13: 2D predictions (top row), 3D predictions (middle row) and tracked skeleton (bottom row) on our real annotated
sequence Fruits. The combination of 2D and 3D predictions in the tracking framework leads to better results than either
of the predictions in isolation.
(a) Pinch sponge
(b) Grab Knife
(c) Reach cupboard
(d) Grab bottle
(e) Write in notebook
(f) Open book
Figure 14: Qualitative evaluation of our results (top) and Rogez et al. [25] (bottom). We mimic the motions originally used
by [25] because, due to sensor differences (i.e. lens intrinsics, etc.), we cannot directly run our trained CNNs on their data.
Figure 15: Qualitative evaluation of our results (top) and Sridhar et al. [31] (bottom).
Figure 16: Qualitative results produced by the approach of Sridhar et al. [31] on our benchmark dataset EgoDexter. The
close proximity of the arm to the camera and the interaction with objects and the environment leads to catastrophic failures.
Figure 17: Despite of being trained for egocentric views, our approach in fact generalizes to 3rd-person views. In addition, it
is robust to the presence of other skin-colored body parts.
Figure 18: The failure cases of our method can be caused by different intermediate steps. The first two columns show the
output from HALNet, a heatmap and its maximum location with corresponding confidence. Note that the root stabilization
step improved the location in the last row (from green to red) but did not succeed. The third, fourth and fifth column shows
2D predictions, 3D predictions, and the tracked kinematic skeleton, respectively.
conv4e
conv4f
3, 1, 512
3, 1, 256
256, 1024 res4d
256, 1024 res4c
res3c
128, 512
2, 256, 1024 res4a
res3b
128, 512
res2c
64, 256
res3a
res2b
64, 256
2, 128, 512
res2a
1, 64, 256
3, 2
conv1
7, 1, 64
256, 1024 res4b
interm. loss
interm. loss
interm. loss
main loss
Residual block (identity skip)
Convolution block, with ReLU
Residual block (convolution)
MAX pooling layer (kernel size, stride)
Scale
BatchNorm
k, s, f
k, s, f
EuclideanLoss
InnerProduct
(3 x #joints)
Deconvolution layer
(kernel size, stride,
number of feature maps),
fixed to bilinear weights
Figure 19: Our network architecture.
EuclideanLoss
InnerProduct
(3 x #joints)
InnerProduct
(200)
EuclideanLoss
JORNet – Main loss (joint positions + heatmaps)
4, 2, #heatmaps
EuclideanLoss
4, 2, #heatmaps
Eltwise SUM
ReLU
1, s, f2
JORNet – Intermediate joint position loss
3, 1, 64
EuclideanLoss
k, s, #heatmaps
Slice
(#heatmaps)
3, 1, #heatmaps
=
Convolution layer (kernel size,
stride, number of feature maps)
Residual block (convolution)
HALNet / JORNet – Intermediate heatmap loss
HALNet – Main loss (heatmaps)
1, 1, f2
3, 1, f1
ReLU
1, s, f1
ReLU
=
4, 2, #heatmaps
Residual block (identity skip)
s, f1, f2
1, 1, f2
3, 1, f1
ReLU
=
Eltwise SUM
ReLU
f1, f2
1, 1, f1
ReLU
Convolution block
Deconvolution layer
(kernel size, stride,
number of feature maps)
References
[1] L. Ballan, A. Taneja, J. Gall, L. V. Gool, and M. Pollefeys.
Motion Capture of Hands in Action using Discriminative
Salient Points. In European Conference on Computer Vision
(ECCV), 2012. 2, 6
[2] A. Canziani, A. Paszke, and E. Culurciello. An analysis of
deep neural network models for practical applications. arXiv
preprint arXiv:1605.07678, 2016. 4
[3] Y. Ganin and V. Lempitsky. Unsupervised domain adaptation
by backpropagation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.7495, 2014.
8
[4] L. Ge, H. Liang, J. Yuan, and D. Thalmann. Robust 3D Hand
Pose Estimation in Single Depth Images: from Single-View
CNN to Multi-View CNNs. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2016. 1, 2
[5] K. Greff, R. K. Srivastava, and J. Schmidhuber. Highway and
residual networks learn unrolled iterative estimation. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2016.
9
[6] H. Hamer, K. Schindler, E. Koller-Meier, and L. Van Gool.
Tracking a hand manipulating an object. In Computer Vision,
2009 IEEE 12th International Conference On, pages 1475–
1482. IEEE, 2009. 2
[7] K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun. Deep residual learning
for image recognition. In IEEE Conference on Computer
Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), June 2016. 4, 9
[8] IntelRealSenseSR300. https://click.intel.com/
realsense.html, 2016. 3
[9] S. Ioffe and C. Szegedy. Batch normalization: Accelerating
deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. In
International Conference on Machine Learning, 2015. 9
[10] Y. Jia, E. Shelhamer, J. Donahue, S. Karayev, J. Long, R. Girshick, S. Guadarrama, and T. Darrell. Caffe: Convolutional architecture for fast feature embedding. arXiv preprint
arXiv:1408.5093, 2014. 6
[11] Y. Jia, E. Shelhamer, J. Donahue, S. Karayev, J. Long, R. Girshick, S. Guadarrama, and T. Darrell. Caffe: Convolutional architecture for fast feature embedding. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pages 675–678, 2014. 10
[12] C. Keskin, F. Kra,̧ Y. E. Kara, and L. Akarun. Real time hand
pose estimation using depth sensors. In IEEE International
Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCVW), pages
1228–1234, 2011. 2
[13] N. Kyriazis and A. Argyros. Scalable 3d tracking of multiple
interacting objects. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision
and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 3430–3437, 2014. 2
[14] LeapMotion.
https://developer.leapmotion.
com/orion, 2016. 2, 6
[15] C.-Y. Lee, S. Xie, P. Gallagher, Z. Zhang, and Z. Tu. Deeplysupervised nets. In AISTATS, volume 2, page 6, 2015. 10
[16] D. Mehta, H. Rhodin, D. Casas, O. Sotnychenko, W. Xu,
and C. Theobalt. Monocular 3d human pose estimation using transfer learning and improved CNN supervision. arXiv
preprint arXiv:1611.09813v2, 2016. 9
[17] M. Oberweger, G. Riegler, P. Wohlhart, and V. Lepetit. Efficiently Creating 3D Training Data for Fine Hand Pose Estimation. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern
Recognition (CVPR), 2016. 1, 4
[18] M. Oberweger, P. Wohlhart, and V. Lepetit. Training a feedback loop for hand pose estimation. In IEEE International
Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pages 3316–3324,
2015. 1, 2
[19] I. Oikonomidis, N. Kyriazis, and A. A. Argyros. Efficient
model-based 3d tracking of hand articulations using kinect.
In BmVC, volume 1, page 3, 2011. 2
[20] I. Oikonomidis, N. Kyriazis, and A. A. Argyros. Full dof
tracking of a hand interacting with an object by modeling occlusions and physical constraints. In Computer Vision (ICCV), 2011 IEEE International Conference on, pages
2088–2095. IEEE, 2011. 2
[21] P. Panteleris, N. Kyriazis, and A. A. Argyros. 3d tracking of
human hands in interaction with unknown objects. In BMVC,
pages 123–1, 2015. 2
[22] C. Qian, X. Sun, Y. Wei, X. Tang, and J. Sun. Realtime
and Robust Hand Tracking from Depth. In IEEE Conference
on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages
1106–1113, 2014. 1, 2, 3
[23] H. Rhodin, C. Richardt, D. Casas, E. Insafutdinov,
M. Shafiei, H.-P. Seidel, B. Schiele, and C. Theobalt. Egocap: egocentric marker-less motion capture with two fisheye
cameras. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 35(6):162,
2016. 2
[24] G. Rogez, M. Khademi, J. Supančič III, J. M. M. Montiel,
and D. Ramanan. 3D hand pose detection in egocentric
RGB-D images. In Workshop at the European Conference
on Computer Vision, pages 356–371. Springer, 2014. 2, 4
[25] G. Rogez, J. S. Supancic, and D. Ramanan. First-person pose
recognition using egocentric workspaces. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR),
pages 4325–4333, 2015. 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 12
[26] M. Rohrbach, S. Amin, M. Andriluka, and B. Schiele. A
database for fine grained activity detection of cooking activities. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern
Recognition (CVPR), pages 1194–1201, 2012. 1
[27] J. Romero, H. Kjellström, and D. Kragic. Hands in action:
real-time 3D reconstruction of hands in interaction with objects. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and
Automation (ICRA), pages 458–463, 2010. 2
[28] O. Russakovsky, J. Deng, H. Su, J. Krause, S. Satheesh,
S. Ma, Z. Huang, A. Karpathy, A. Khosla, M. Bernstein,
A. C. Berg, and L. Fei-Fei. ImageNet Large Scale Visual
Recognition Challenge. International Journal of Computer
Vision (IJCV), 115(3):211–252, 2015. 6
[29] A. Sinha, C. Choi, and K. Ramani. Deephand: robust hand
pose estimation by completing a matrix imputed with deep
features. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 4150–4158, 2016. 1, 2
[30] S. Sridhar, A. M. Feit, C. Theobalt, and A. Oulasvirta. Investigating the dexterity of multi-finger input for mid-air text
entry. In ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing
Systems, pages 3643–3652, 2015. 1
[31] S. Sridhar, F. Mueller, A. Oulasvirta, and C. Theobalt. Fast
and Robust Hand Tracking Using Detection-Guided Optimization. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2015. 1, 2, 3, 5, 9, 12
[32] S. Sridhar, F. Mueller, M. Zollhoefer, D. Casas,
A. Oulasvirta, and C. Theobalt. Real-time Joint Tracking
of a Hand Manipulating an Object from RGB-D Input. In
European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 2016.
2, 3
[33] S. Sridhar, A. Oulasvirta, and C. Theobalt. Interactive markerless articulated hand motion tracking using RGB and depth
data. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern
Recognition (CVPR), pages 2456–2463, 2013. 2, 6
[34] X. Sun, Y. Wei, S. Liang, X. Tang, and J. Sun. Cascaded hand
pose regression. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 824–832,
2015. 2
[35] A. Tagliasacchi, M. Schroeder, A. Tkach, S. Bouaziz,
M. Botsch, and M. Pauly. Robust Articulated-ICP for RealTime Hand Tracking. Computer Graphics Forum (Symposium on Geometry Processing), 34(5), 2015. 1, 2
[36] D. Tang, H. Jin Chang, A. Tejani, and T.-K. Kim. Latent regression forest: Structured estimation of 3d articulated hand posture. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference
on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 3786–
3793, 2014. 2
[37] D. Tang, J. Taylor, P. Kohli, C. Keskin, T.-K. Kim, and
J. Shotton. Opening the black box: Hierarchical sampling
optimization for estimating human hand pose. In Proc.
ICCV, 2015. 2
[38] J. Taylor, L. Bordeaux, T. Cashman, B. Corish, C. Keskin,
T. Sharp, E. Soto, D. Sweeney, J. Valentin, B. Luff, et al.
Efficient and precise interactive hand tracking through joint,
continuous optimization of pose and correspondences. ACM
Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 35(4):143, 2016. 1, 2, 3
[39] J. Tompson, M. Stein, Y. Lecun, and K. Perlin. Real-time
continuous pose recovery of human hands using convolutional networks. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 33, August
2014. 1, 2
[40] D. Tzionas, L. Ballan, A. Srikantha, P. Aponte, M. Pollefeys,
and J. Gall. Capturing hands in action using discriminative
salient points and physics simulation. International Journal
of Computer Vision (IJCV), 2016. 2
[41] D. Tzionas and J. Gall. 3d object reconstruction from handobject interactions. In Proceedings of the IEEE International
Conference on Computer Vision, pages 729–737, 2015. 2
[42] C. Wan, T. Probst, L. Van Gool, and A. Yao. Crossing nets:
Dual generative models with a shared latent space for hand
pose estimation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.03431, 2017. 1
[43] C. Wan, A. Yao, and L. Van Gool. Hand pose estimation
from local surface normals. In European Conference on
Computer Vision, pages 554–569. Springer, 2016. 2
[44] R. Wang, S. Paris, and J. Popović. 6d hands: markerless
hand-tracking for computer aided design. In Proc. of UIST,
pages 549–558. ACM, 2011. 2
[45] C. Xu and L. Cheng. Efficient hand pose estimation from a
single depth image. In Proceedings of the IEEE International
Conference on Computer Vision, pages 3456–3462, 2013. 2
[46] Q. Ye, S. Yuan, and T.-K. Kim. Spatial attention deep net
with partial pso for hierarchical hybrid hand pose estimation.
In European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), pages
346–361. Springer, 2016. 2
[47] W. Zhao, J. Zhang, J. Min, and J. Chai. Robust realtime
physics-based motion control for human grasping. ACM
Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 32(6):207, 2013. 1
[48] X. Zhou, Q. Wan, W. Zhang, X. Xue, and Y. Wei. Modelbased deep hand pose estimation. In IJCAI, 2016. 2
| 1cs.CV
|
arXiv:1012.3010v2 [math.AC] 28 Nov 2013
HOMOLOGICAL ALGEBRA MODULO EXACT ZERO-DIVISORS
PETTER ANDREAS BERGH, OLGUR CELIKBAS AND DAVID A. JORGENSEN
Abstract. We study the homological behavior of modules over local rings
modulo exact zero-divisors. We obtain new results which are in some sense
“opposite” to those known for modules over local rings modulo regular elements.
1. Introduction
Given a local (meaning also commutative and Noetherian) ring S and an ideal
I, one may ask whether the homological behavior of modules over S/I is related to
that over S. In general this is hopeless; one needs to restrict the ideal I. When I
is generated by a regular sequence, there is a well-developed and powerful theory
relating the homological properties of modules over these two rings (see for instance
[Av1], [AvBu], [Be], [Dao1], [Eis], [Gu1], [Jo1], and [Jo2]). For example, suppose
that the ideal I is generated by a single regular element x ∈ S, denote the factor
ring S/(x) by R, and let M and N be R-modules. Then a primary result is that
R
R
TorR
1 (M, N ) = Tor2 (M, N ) = · · · = Torn (M, N ) = 0
for some n ≥ 2, implies
TorS2 (M, N ) = · · · = TorSn (M, N ) = 0.
In other words, vanishing of homology over R implies the vanishing of homology
over S. An analogous statement for cohomology also holds.
Another primary result compares the complexity of a finitely generated R-module
with its complexity as an S-module (see Section 3 for the definition of complexity).
Namely there are inequalities [Av1, 3.2(3)]:
cxS (M ) ≤ cxR (M ) ≤ cxS (M ) + 1.
In this paper we study the case where the element x ∈ S is in some sense the
“next best thing” to being a regular element. More precisely, we consider the case
where the annihilator of x is a nonzero principal ideal whose annihilator is also
principal (and therefore is the ideal (x)). Following [HeŞ], the element x is said to
be an exact zero-divisor if it is nonzero, belongs to the maximal ideal of S, and
there exists another element y ∈ S such that annS (x) = (y) and annS (y) = (x). In
this case we say that (x, y) is a pair of exact zero-divisors of S. The ideal (x) is then
an example of a quasi-complete intersection ideal, a notion introduced in [AHŞ]. In
that same paper results relating certain invariants of modules over S with those
over S/(x) are proved. We continue along similar, but more homological lines, and
show that even if the element x is the next best thing to being regular, namely an
Date: March 13, 2018.
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. 13D03.
Key words and phrases. Exact zero divisors, (co)homology, complexity.
1
2
PETTER ANDREAS BERGH, OLGUR CELIKBAS AND DAVID A. JORGENSEN
exact zero-divisor, then the homological relationships between S/(x)-modules over
S/(x) and over S change dramatically compared to the case where x is regular.
Two of our main results in Section 2 concern the vanishing of (co)homology. In
particular the result for homology takes the following form:
Theorem. Let R = S/(x) where S is a local ring and (x, y) is a pair of exact
zero-divisors in S. Furthermore, let M and N be R-modules such that yN = 0.
If there exists an integer n ≥ 2 such that TorR
i (M, N ) = 0 for 1 ≤ i ≤ n, then
TorSi (M, N ) ∼
= M ⊗S N for 1 ≤ i ≤ n − 1.
Compared to the vanishing result for the case where x is regular, the conclusion
of the previous theorem is opposite in the sense that it is a non-vanishing result:
vanishing of homology over R implies the non-vanishing of homology over S (when
the modules involved are nonzero and finitely generated.) For cohomology, we obtain
the following analogue:
Theorem. Let R = S/(x) where S is a local ring and (x, y) is a pair of exact
zero-divisors in S. Furthermore, let M and N be R-modules such that yN = 0.
If there exists an integer n ≥ 2 such that ExtiR (M, N ) = 0 for 1 ≤ i ≤ n, then
ExtiS (M, N ) ∼
= HomS (M, N ) for 1 ≤ i ≤ n − 1.
We also compare the complexities of finitely generated modules over R and over
S. Similar to our previous results, we show that such a comparison is quite different
from the case where x is regular. The following theorem is the main result of section
3.
Theorem. Let R = S/(x) where S is a local ring and x is an exact zero-divisor in
S. If M is a finitely generated R-module, then for any n there are inequalities
βnR (M ) −
n−2
X
βiR (M ) ≤ βnS (M ) ≤
n
X
βiR (M )
i=0
i=0
of Betti numbers. In particular, the inequality cxS (M ) ≤ cxR (M ) + 1 holds.
In the final section, Section 4, we discuss canonical endomorphisms of complexes
of finitely generated free R-modules, and canonical elements of Ext2R (M, M ), for
finitely generated R-modules M , in the case where R = S/(x) and (x, x) is a pair
of exact zero-divisors of S. The main result, Theorem 4.2, equates the ability to
lift a finitely generated R-module M from R to S to the triviality of the canonical
element in Ext2R (M, M ). This generalizes classical results (see, for example, [ADS])
on lifting modules from T /(x) to T /(x2 ) in the case where x is a non-zero-divisor
of the local ring T (cf. Example 4.3 below).
2. Vanishing results
In this section we prove our vanishing results, starting with the homology version.
We fix a local ring S, a pair of exact zero-divisors (x, y), and denote the local ring
S/(x) by R. It should be mentioned that the modules we consider in this section
are not necessarily assumed to be finitely generated.
Since a (deleted) free resolution of R over S has the form
y
x
y
x
··· → S −
→S−
→S−
→S−
→S→0
HOMOLOGICAL ALGEBRA MODULO EXACT ZERO-DIVISORS
3
one has for any R-module N the following
for q = 0
N
N/yN
for q > 0 odd
(†)
TorSq (R, N ) ∼
=
annN (y) for q > 0 even
and
(‡)
for q = 0
N
annN (y) for q > 0 odd
ExtqS (R, N ) ∼
=
N/yN
for q > 0 even
Our main theorem on the vanishing of homology is the following.
Theorem 2.1. Let R = S/(x) where S is a local ring and (x, y) is a pair of exact
zero-divisors in S. Furthermore, let M and N be R-modules. If there exists an
R
R
integer n ≥ 2 such that TorR
i (M, N ) = Tori (M, N/yN ) = Tori (M, annN (y)) = 0
for 1 ≤ i ≤ n, then
for i = 0
M ⊗S N
M ⊗S N/yN
for 0 < i < n and i odd
TorSi (M, N ) ∼
=
M ⊗S annN (y) for 0 < i < n and i even.
Proof. Consider the first quadrant change of rings spectral sequence [Rot, Theorem
10.73]
S
S
TorR
p M, Torq (R, N ) =⇒ Torp+q (M, N ).
p
From (†), the term
2
Ep,q
2
Ep,q
is given by
R
for q = 0
Torp (M, N )
R
∼
Torp (M, N/yN )
for q > 0 odd
=
TorR
p (M, annN (y)) for q > 0 even.
The vanishing assumptions imply that columns 1 through n of the E 2 -page of this
2
spectral sequence vanish, i.e., Ep,q
= 0 for all q ∈ Z and 1 ≤ p ≤ n. Fixing
∞
2
such p and q, we see that Ep,q also vanishes since this term is a subquotient of Ep,q
.
S
j
Letting Hi denote Tori (M, N ) for all i, we have a filtration {Φ Hi } of Hi satisfying
0 = Φ−1 Hi ⊆ Φ0 Hi ⊆ · · · ⊆ Φi−1 Hi ⊆ Φi Hi = Hi ,
∞
∼ Φj Hi /Φj−1 Hi for all i and j. Thus the vanishing of E ∞ implies that
with Ej,i−j
=
p,q
Φp Hp+q = Φp−1 Hp+q , that is, Φp Hq = Φp−1 Hq for all q ∈ Z and 1 ≤ p ≤ n.
2
Now consider the zeroth column of the E 2 -page. For a positive q, the E0,q
-term
is isomorphic to M ⊗R N/yN when q is odd, and isomorphic to M ⊗R annN (y)
2
when q is even. Since Ep,q
= 0 for all q ∈ Z and 1 ≤ p ≤ n, there is an isomorphism
2
∞ ∼
E0,q = E0,q for q ≤ n − 1, giving
for q = 0
M ⊗S N
∞ ∼
M
⊗
N/yN
for 0 < q < n and q odd
E0,q
=
R
M ⊗R annN (y) for 0 < q < n and q even.
But it follows from above that the equalities
∞ ∼ 0
E0,q
= Φ H q = Φ 1 Hq = · · · = Φ q H q
hold when q < n. Therefore, since Φq Hq = TorSq (M, N ), we are done.
4
PETTER ANDREAS BERGH, OLGUR CELIKBAS AND DAVID A. JORGENSEN
As an immediate corollary we obtain the result, for the vanishing of homology,
stated in the introduction.
Corollary 2.2. Let R = S/(x) where S is a local ring and (x, y) is a pair of exact
zero-divisors in S. Furthermore, let M and N be R-modules such that yN = 0.
If there exists an integer n ≥ 2 such that TorR
i (M, N ) = 0 for 1 ≤ i ≤ n, then
TorSi (M, N ) ∼
= M ⊗S N for 0 ≤ i ≤ n − 1. Consequently, if M and N are nonzero
and finitely generated, then TorSi (M, N ) 6= 0 for 0 ≤ i ≤ n − 1.
Thus when the modules involved are finitely generated and nonzero, the corollary
shows that the vanishing of homology over R implies the non-vanishing of homology
over S. This is in stark contrast to the case when x is a regular element.
In certain cases we can show that the Tors over S cannot vanish irrespective of
vanishing of the Tors over R.
Proposition 2.3. Let R = S/(x) where S is a local ring and (x, y) is a pair of
exact zero-divisors, both of which are minimal generators of the maximal ideal of
S. Furthermore, let M and N be nonzero finitely generated R-modules such that
yN = 0. Then TorSi (M, N ) 6= 0 for all i ≥ 0.
Proof. Consider a minimal free resolution of M over S:
∂
∂
1
2
F0 → 0
F1 −→
F : · · · → F2 −→
Letting m denote a minimal generator of M , we can define the homomorphism
f : S/(x) → M sending 1̄ to m. Because x and y are minimal generators of the
maximal ideal of S, we can lift this homomorphism to a chain map
y
···
/S
···
/ F2
x
/S
f2
/S
f1
∂2
/ F1
/ S/(x)
f0
f
/M
/ F0
∂1
/0
/0
in such a way that each fi is a split injection. Tensoring the entire diagram with
N we get the commutative diagram
···
/N
···
/ F2 ⊗S N
0
f2 ⊗N
∂2 ⊗N
0
/N
f1 ⊗N
/ F1 ⊗S N
∂1 ⊗N
/N
f0 ⊗N
/ F0 ⊗S N
=
/N
/0
f ⊗N
/ M ⊗S N
/0
Now let n be a minimal generator of N . Then fi (1) ⊗S n is a minimal generator of
Fi ⊗S N , and by commutativity, is in ker(∂i ⊗S N ) for all i ≥ 1. This element is not
a boundary, however, since ∂i+1 ⊆ m Fi , and no element in the image of ∂i+1 ⊗S N
is a minimal generator of Fi ⊗S N . It follows that TorSi (M, N ) 6= 0 for all i ≥ 0.
We next state the cohomological versions of Theorem 2.1 and Corollary 2.2; they
are proved dually.
Theorem 2.4. Let R = S/(x) where S is a local ring and (x, y) is a pair of exact
zero-divisors in S. Furthermore, let M and N be R-modules. If there exists an
HOMOLOGICAL ALGEBRA MODULO EXACT ZERO-DIVISORS
5
integer n ≥ 2 such that ExtiR (M, N ) = ExtiR (M, N/yN ) = ExtiR (M, annN (y)) = 0
for 1 ≤ i ≤ n, then
for i = 0
HomS (M, N )
HomS (M, annN (y)) for 0 < i < n and i odd
ExtiS (M, N ) ∼
=
HomS (M, N/yN )
for 0 < i < n and i even
Corollary 2.5. Let R = S/(x) where S is a local ring and (x, y) is a pair of
exact zero-divisors in S. Furthermore, let M and N be R-modules with yN = 0.
If there exists an integer n ≥ 2 such that ExtiR (M, N ) = 0 for 1 ≤ i ≤ n, then
ExtiS (M, N ) ∼
= HomS (M, N ) for 0 ≤ i < n. Consequently, if N = M 6= 0, then
ExtiS (M, M ) 6= 0 for 0 < i < n.
3. Complexity
As in the previous section, we fix a local ring S, a pair of exact zero-divisors (x, y),
and denote the local ring S/(x) by R. In this section all modules are assumed to be
finitely generated. Our aim is to compare free resolutions of modules over R with
those over S and determine relationships involving complexities.
Given a local ring A and an A-module M , there exists a (deleted) free resolution
of M
· · · → F2 → F1 → F0 → 0
which is minimal, that is, it appears as a direct summand of every free resolution of
M . The cokernel of the map Fn+1 → Fn is the nth syzygy module of M and denoted
by ΩnA (M ). Minimal free resolutions are unique up to isomorphisms and hence the
syzygies are uniquely determined up to isomorphism. Moreover, for every nonnegdef
ative integer n, the nth Betti number βnA (M ) = rank Fn is a well-defined invariant
n
of M . It is well-known that dimk ExtA (M, k) = βnA (M ) = dimk TorA
n (M, k) for
every integer n where k is the residue field of A. It is also clear that the projective
dimension of M is finite if and only if the Betti numbers of M eventually vanish.
Thus the asymptotic behavior of the Betti sequence β0A (M ), β1A (M ), β2A (M ), . . . determines an important homological property of M . Following ideas from modular
representation theory [Alp], an invariant measuring how “fast” the Betti sequence
grows was introduced by Avramov in [Av1] (cf. also [Av2]). The complexity of M ,
denoted by cxA (M ), is defined as
def
cxA (M ) = inf{t ∈ N ∪ {0} | ∃a ∈ R such that βnA (M ) ≤ ant−1 for all n},
and measures the polynomial rate of growth of the Betti sequence of M . It follows
from the definition that M has finite projective dimension if and only if cxA (M ) = 0,
whereas cxA (M ) = 1 if and only if the Betti sequence of M is bounded. For an
arbitrary local ring, the complexity of a module is not necessarily finite [Av3, 4.2.2].
In fact, by [Gu2, Theorem 2.3], finiteness of complexity for all finitely generated
A-modules is equivalent to A being a complete intersection.
We now return to our previous setting of exact zero-divisors. We first remark
that every nonzero R-module has infinite projective dimension over S, that is, every
such module has positive complexity over S. Indeed, (†) from the second paragraph
of Section 2 shows that if TorSi (R, M ) = 0 for all i ≫ 0, then M/yM = 0. Thus
M = 0 by Nakayama’s Lemma.
6
PETTER ANDREAS BERGH, OLGUR CELIKBAS AND DAVID A. JORGENSEN
Over a local ring A, the complexity of a module equals the complexity of any of
its syzygies: their minimal free resolutions are the same except at the beginning.
Moreover, given a short exact sequence
0 → M1 → M2 → M3 → 0
of A-modules, the inequality
(*)
cxA (Mu ) ≤ max{cxA (Mv ), cxA (Mw )}
holds for {u, v, w} = {1, 2, 3}. This follows simply by comparing the k-vector space
dimensions of the Tor modules in the long exact sequence
A
A
A
· · · → TorA
n (M1 , k) → Torn (M2 , k) → Torn (M3 , k) → Torn−1 (M1 , k) → · · · ,
where k is the residue field of A.
In the next proposition we use the inequality (*) and prove that if M is an
R-module with cxS (M ) 6= 1, then cxS (M ) = cxS (ΩnR (M )) for all n. Here the
assumption cxS (M ) 6= 1 is necessary: the S-module R has a minimal free resolution
y
x
y
x
··· → S −
→S−
→S−
→S−
→S→0
and hence has complexity one over S. However its syzygies ΩnR (R) are all zero for
n > 0.
Proposition 3.1. Let R = S/(x) where S is a local ring and x is an exact zerodivisor in S. Then, for every finitely generated R-module M with cxS (M ) 6= 1, the
equality cxS (M ) = cxS (ΩnR (M )) holds for all n.
Proof. If cxS (M ) = 0, then M = 0 (see the third paragraph of Section 3.) Thus
the result is trivial in this case. Next suppose cxS (M ) > 1. Consider the short
exact sequence
0 → Ω1R (M ) → F → M → 0
where F is a free R-module. Since the S-module R has complexity one so does
F . Hence the result follows from the inequality (∗) and the short exact sequence
considered above.
Next we will compare the Betti numbers and complexities of modules over R
with those over S. For that we first set some notations that generalize the notion
of the Betti number and the complexity of a module.
Let (A, m) be a local ring with residue field k, and M and N be A-modules with
the property that M ⊗A N has finite length. Then, for every nonnegative integer
n, the length of TorA
n (M, N ) is finite. We define this length to be the nth Betti
def
A
number βn (M, N ) of the pair (M, N ), that is, βnA (M, N ) = ℓ TorA
n (M, N ) . The
length complexity of the pair (M, N ), denoted by ℓcxA (M, N ), is then defined as:
def
ℓcxA (M, N ) = inf{t ∈ N ∪ {0} | ∃a ∈ R such that βnA (M, N ) ≤ ant−1 for all n},
cf. [Dao2, the discussion preceding Definition 2.1]. Although letting N = k, we
recover the Betti number and the ordinary complexity of M , that is,
βnA (M ) = βnA (M, k) and cxA (M ) = ℓcxA (M, k),
our definition for ℓcxA (M, N ) of the pair (M, N ) is different than the one originally defined by Avramov and Buchweitz [AvBu], where the minimal number of
generators of the cohomology modules ExtnA (M, N ) is used. In general there is no
HOMOLOGICAL ALGEBRA MODULO EXACT ZERO-DIVISORS
7
comparison between these two definitions of Betti numbers of the pair (M, N ); see
also [Dao2, Theorem 5.4].
Theorem 3.2. Let R = S/(x) where S is a local ring and (x, y) is a pair of exact
zero-divisors in S. Furthermore, let M and N be finitely generated R-modules such
that yN = 0 and M ⊗R N has finite length. Then, for all n,
(3.2)
βnR (M, N ) −
n−2
X
βiR (M, N ) ≤ βnS (M, N ) ≤
n
X
βiR (M, N )
i=0
i=0
Remark. We have used the convention that negative Betti numbers are zero.
Proof. As in the proof of Theorem 2.1, we consider the first quadrant change of
rings spectral sequence:
S
S
TorR
p M, Torq (R, N ) =⇒ Torp+q (M, N ).
p
2
Since yN = 0, we see from (†) that the E 2 -page entries are given by Ep,q
=
R
Torp (M, N ).
We first prove the left-hand inequality of (3.2). Fix an integer n and consider
the short exact sequence
∞
0 → Φn−1 Hn → TorSn (M, N ) → En,0
→ 0,
∞
where Φi Hn is the filtration of Hn from the proof of Theorem 2.1. Since En,0
=
S
n
n
Ker dn,0 , we obtain the inequality ℓ Torn (M, N ) ≥ ℓ(Ker dn,0 ). Now for all 2 ≤
p ≤ n, there is an exact sequence
p
0 → Ker dpn,0 → Ker dp−1
n,0 → Im dn,0 → 0,
which implies
ℓ(Ker dnn,0 )
n−1
= ℓ(Ker dn,0
) − ℓ(Im dnn,0 )
n−2
n−1
= ℓ(Ker dn,0
) − ℓ(Im dn,0
) + ℓ(Im dnn,0 )
..
.
= ℓ(Ker d1n,0 ) −
n
X
ℓ(Im din,0 ).
i=2
i
For 2 ≤ i ≤ n, the image of
is a submodule of En−i,i−1
, and the latter is a
R
2
2
subquotient of En−i,i−1
. Then since En−i,i−1
= Torn−i (M, N ), there is an inequal
2
ity ℓ(Im din,0 ) ≤ ℓ TorR
n−i (M, N ) . Moreover the module En,0 is a subquotient of
R
2
Ker d1n,0 . Thus, since En,0
= Torn (M, N ), we have ℓ(Ker d1n,0 ) ≥ ℓ TorR
n (M, N ) .
This gives
ℓ TorSn (M, N ) ≥ ℓ(Ker dnn,0 )
n
X
ℓ(Im din,0 )
= ℓ(Ker d1n,0 ) −
din,0
i=2
≥
proving the left-hand inequality.
ℓ
TorR
n (M, N )
−
n−2
X
i=0
ℓ TorR
i (M, N ) ,
8
PETTER ANDREAS BERGH, OLGUR CELIKBAS AND DAVID A. JORGENSEN
For the right-hand inequality, we fix an integer n and consider the short exact
sequence:
∞
0 → Φp−1 Hn → Φp Hn → Ep,n−p
→0
for 0 ≤ p ≤ n. Counting the lengths, we obtain equalities
∞
ℓ (Φn Hn ) = ℓ Φn−1 Hn + ℓ En,0
∞
∞
+ ℓ En,0
= ℓ Φn−2 Hn + ℓ En−1,1
..
.
n
X
∞
.
ℓ Ei,n−i
=
i=0
2
2
Each
is a subquotient of Ei,n−i
, and so since Ei,n−i
= TorR
i (M, N ), we obtain
R
∞
n
the inequality ℓ(Ei,n−i ) ≤ ℓ Tori (M, N ) . Then since Φ Hn = TorSn (M, N ), we
obtain
ℓ TorSn (M, N ) = ℓ (Φn Hn )
n
X
∞
ℓ Ei,n−i
=
∞
Ei,n−i
i=0
≤
n
X
i=0
proving the right-hand inequality.
ℓ TorR
i (M, N ) ,
As a consequence, using the right-hand side of the inequality (3.2), we obtain an
upper bound for ℓcxS (M, N ) in terms of the complexity of (M, N ) over R.
Corollary 3.3. Let R = S/(x) where S is a local ring and (x, y) is a pair of exact
zero-divisors in S. Furthermore, let M and N be finitely generated R-modules such
that yN = 0 and M ⊗R N has finite length. Then ℓcxS (M, N ) ≤ ℓcxR (M, N ) + 1.
Proof. If ℓcxR (M, N ) = ∞, then there is nothing to prove. So suppose ℓcxR (M, N ) =
c < ∞. Then, by the definition, there exists a real number a such that βnR (M, N ) ≤
anc−1 for all n. By Theorem 3.2, the inequality
n
n
X
X
aic−1 ≤ (n + 1)anc−1
βiR (M, N ) ≤
βnS (M, N ) ≤
i=0
i=0
holds for all n. Therefore there is a real number b such that βnS (M, N ) ≤ bnc for
all n. This shows that ℓcxS (M, N ) ≤ c + 1.
We are unaware of an example of a pair of R-modules for which equality holds in
the left-hand side of (3.2). On the other hand, equality may occur in the right-hand
side. Indeed, when the exact zero-divisors x and y are minimal generators of the
maximal ideal of S, Henriques and Şega prove [HeŞ, 1.7] that the equality
∞
∞
X
1 X R
βn (M )tn
βnS (M )tn =
1
−
t
n=0
n=0
of Poincaré series holds for every finitely generated R-module M . This gives:
n
X
βnS (M ) =
βiR (M )
i=0
HOMOLOGICAL ALGEBRA MODULO EXACT ZERO-DIVISORS
9
However, when x and y are arbitrary, the equality of the Poincaré series stated
above may fail:
Example 3.4. Let S = k[[x]]/(x3 ) where k is a field. Then x2 is an exact zero
divisor in S. Set R = S/(x2 ) ∼
= k[[x]]/(x2 ). It can be seen that:
∞
∞
X
X
1
S
n
=
βnR (k)tn
βn (k)t =
1
−
t
n=0
n=0
This example also shows that the inequality of Corollary 3.3 can be strict.
We now give an example illustrating the fact that the left-hand inequality of
(3.2) does give useful lower bounds in some cases:
Example 3.5. Let R = k[x1 . . . , xe ]/(x1 , . . . , xe )2 , and M be a finitely generated
R-module. Then Ω1R (M ) is a finite dimensional vector space over k of dimension
β1R (M ). It is easy to see that the Betti numbers of k are βnR (k) = en . It follows
that βnR (M ) = β1R (M )en−1 for all n ≥ 1. From the left-hand inequality of (3.2) we
have
n−2
X
βiR (M )
βnS (M ) ≥ βnR (M ) −
i=0
=
β1R (M )en−1
−
n−2
X
β1R (M )ei−1
i=1
=
=
!
− β0R (M )
en−2 − 1
R
n−1
β1 (M ) e
−
− β0R (M )
e−1
n
e − en−1 − en−2 + 1
β1R (M )
− β0R (M )
e−1
β1R (M ) n−1
e
− β0R (M )
2
for e ≥ 2 and for any ring S such that there exists an exact zero-divisor x with R ∼
=
S/(x). Note that the last inequality follows since for e ≥ 2 we have e2 − e − 2 ≥ 0.
Then en−2 (e2 − e − 2) ≥ 0, which implies that en − en−1 − 2en−2 + 2 ≥ 0. Thus
2(en − en−1 − en−2 + 1) ≥ en−1 (e − 1), and the desired inequality follows. In
particular, R-modules must have exponential growth over S as well. As a specific
example, let S = k[x, y, z]/(x2 , y 2 , z 2 , yz). Then x is an exact zero-divisor in S, and
R = S/(x) ∼
= k[y, z]/(y, z)2 has the form above.
≥
When N = k, the assumptions that M ⊗ N has finite length and yN = 0 hold
automatically. Therefore, in this situation, Theorem 3.2 and Corollary 3.3 can be
summarized as follows:
Corollary 3.6. Let R = S/(x) where S is a local ring and x is an exact zero-divisor
in S. Then, for every finitely generated R-module M , the inequalities
βnR (M ) −
n−2
X
i=0
βiR (M ) ≤ βnS (M ) ≤
n
X
βiR (M )
i=0
hold for all n. Consequently cxS (M ) ≤ cxR (M ) + 1 holds.
Remark. It follows from [AHŞ, 4.4] that R is a complete intersection if and only if
S is a complete intersection. The complexity inequality obtained in Corollary 3.6
10
PETTER ANDREAS BERGH, OLGUR CELIKBAS AND DAVID A. JORGENSEN
gives a different proof for the ‘only if’ direction this result: if cxR (k) < ∞, where
k is the residue field of R, then it follows from Corollary 3.6 that cxS (k) < ∞ and
hence, by [Gu2, 2.5], S is a complete intersection.
Another observation related to the result stated above concerns commutative local Cohen-Macaulay Golod rings [Av3, 5.2]. Assume S is such a ring. Since a finitely
generated module has infinite complexity over S in case it has infinite projective
dimension over S and codepth(S) ≥ 2 [Av3, 5.3.3(2)], we conclude codepth(S) ≤ 1
(Recall cxS (R) = 1). Moreover, as x is not regular, codepth(S) = 1. This implies
that S is a hypersurface and hence R is a complete intersection.
As discussed in the introduction, when x is regular the complexity inequality is
quite different than the one obtained in Corollary 3.6. More precisely, in that case
the inequalities cxS (M ) ≤ cxR (M ) ≤ cxS (M )+1 hold. In particular the complexity
of M over R is finite if and only if it is finite over S. However, in our situation,
when x is an exact zero-divisor, we are unable to deduce any further inequalities,
such as cxR (M ) ≤ cxS (M ), from Theorem 3.2. In fact we do not know whether
there exists an R-module M with cxS (M ) < ∞ and cxR (M ) = ∞. We record this
in the next question.
Question. Let R = S/(x) where S is a local ring and x is an exact zero-divisor in
S. Is cxR (M ) ≤ cxS (M ) for all finitely generated R-modules M ?
4. Canonical elements of Ext2R (M, M ) and Lifting
In this section we restrict our attention to the case where (x, x) is a pair of
exact zero-divisors in the local ring S, and R = S/(x). We discuss natural chain
endomorphisms of complexes over R, following the construction in [Eis, Section 1],
and show that whether or not they are null-homotopic dictates the liftability of
R-modules to S. These results generalize classical results (see, for example [ADS])
for lifting modules modulo a regular element to modulo the square of the regular
element.
Canonical endomorphisms of complexes. Let
(1)
∂i+1
∂
i
Fi−1 → · · ·
F : · · · → Fi+1 −−−→ Fi −→
be a complex of finitely generated free R-modules. We let
(2)
e
e
∂i+1
∂i e
Fi−1 → · · ·
Fe : · · · → Fei+1 −−−→ Fei −→
denote a preimage over S of the complex F , that is, a sequence of homomorphisms
∂ei : Fei → Fei−1 of free S-modules such that F and Fe ⊗S R are isomorphic Rcomplexes. From the fact that ∂ei−1 ∂ei (Fei ) ⊆ xFei−2 for all i, we can write
(3)
si
∂ei−1 ∂ei = xe
for some homomorphism sei : Fei → Fei−2 . Now we define the homomorphisms
si : Fi → Fi−2 by
(4)
si = sei ⊗S R
for all i.
There are several properties of the si which we should like to mention. See [Eis,
Section 1] for the proofs. (Note that in our case (x)/(x)2 = (x) ∼
= S/(x) is a free
S/(x)-module.)
HOMOLOGICAL ALGEBRA MODULO EXACT ZERO-DIVISORS
11
(a) The definition of si is independent of the factorization in (3).
(b) The family s = {si } is a chain endomorphism of F of degree −2.
(c) Let
δi+1
δ
i
Gi−1 → · · ·
G : · · · → Gi+1 −−−→ Gi −→
be another complex of finitely generated free R-modules, and assume that
there exists a chain map f : F → G. Let t = {ti = e
ti ⊗S R : Gi → Gi−2 } be
e
ti for all i, where G
the chain map defined by the factorizations δei−1 δei = xe
is a preimage over S of G. Then the chain maps f s and tf are homotopic.
(d) From (c) it follows that the definition of the si is independent, up to homotopy, of the preimage Fe of F chosen in (2).
The group ExtnA (M, M ). Let A be an associative ring, and M an A-module.
Suppose that F is a projective resolution of M . Then Hn (HomA (F, F )) is the
group of homotopy equivalence classes of chain endomorphisms of F of degree n.
For a chain endomorphism s of F of degree n, we let [s] denote the class of s in
Hn (HomA (F, F )). Let G be another projective resolution of M over A. Then the
comparison maps f : F → G and g : G → F lifting the identity map on M are
homotopically equivalent. That is, f g is homotopic to the identity map on G and
gf is homotopic to the identity map on F . It follows that the map
(5)
F
θG
: Hn (HomA (F, F )) → Hn (HomA (G, G))
given by [s] 7→ [f sg] is an isomorphism, with inverse θFG : [s] 7→ [gsf ]. It is wellknown that this group is ExtnA (M, M ) (see, for example [AV].)
Canonical elements of Ext2R (M, M ). Returning to the situation where R =
S/(x) for the pair (x, x) of exact zero-divisors, let F be a free resolution of M over
R, and s be the endomorphism of F defined by (4). Thus we have the element
[s] ∈ H2 (HomR (F, F )). That we call [s] a canonical element of Ext2R (M, M ) is
reinforced by the following lemma.
Lemma 4.1. Let R = S/(x) where S is a local ring and (x, x) is a pair of exact
zero-divisors in S. Suppose that F and G are free resolutions of a finitely generated
module M over R, that s is the canonical endomorphism of F as defined in (4),
and that t is the canonical endomorphism of G as defined in (4). Then we have
θFG ([t]) = [s]
where θFG is the isomorphism defined in (5).
Proof. First assume that F is a minimal free resolution of M . Then the comparison
map f : F → G lifting the identity map on M can be chosen to be a split injection,
with splitting g : G → F , also lifting the identity map on M . In particular, we
have gf = idF , the identity map on F .
e be a preimage
Denote the differential on F by ∂, and that on G by δ. Let (Fe , ∂)
e
e
over S of (F, ∂), and (G, δ) be a preimage over S of (G, δ). We choose preimages fe
of f and e
g of g over S such that gefe = idFe .
ei → Fei−1 such that gei−1 δei = ∂ei e
gi +xui
As gi−1 δi = ∂i gi for all i, there exists ui : G
e
e
for all i. Similarly, there exists vi : Fi → Gi−1 such that δei fei = fei−1 ∂ei + xvi for all
12
PETTER ANDREAS BERGH, OLGUR CELIKBAS AND DAVID A. JORGENSEN
i. Thus we have
x(e
gi−2 e
ti fei − sei ) =
=
=
gei−2 δei−1 δei fei − ∂ei−1 ∂ei
(∂ei−1 gei−1 + xui−1 )(fei−1 ∂ei + xvi ) − ∂ei−1 ∂ei
x(∂ei−1 gei−1 vi + ui−1 fei−1 ∂ei ).
It follows that gi−2 ti fi −si = ∂i−1 (gi−1 v i )+(ui−1 fi−1 )∂i for all i, where ui = ui ⊗S R
and v i = vi ⊗S R. We will have shown that gtf is homotopic to s with homotopy
hi = ui fi once we know that ui fi = gi−1 v i for all i. But this is easy:
x(ui fei − gei−1 vi ) =
=
=
gi−1 (δei fei − fei−1 ∂ei )
(e
gi−1 δei − ∂ei gei )fei − e
−∂ei gei fei + gei−1 fei−1 ∂ei
0,
hence the claim follows.
F
Notice that we also have θG
([s]) = [t], when F is minimal. Therefore, for two
arbitrary free resolutions F and G of M , that θFG ([t]) = [s] follows from composing
G L
θFG = θL
θF where L is a minimal free resolution of M .
Lifting. Let B be an associative ring, I an ideal of B, and A = B/I. Recall that
a finitely generated A-module M is said to lift to B, with lifting M ′ , if there exists
′
a finitely generated B-module M ′ such that M ∼
= M ′ ⊗B A, and TorB
i (M , A) = 0
for all i ≥ 1. Similarly, a complex of finitely generated free A-modules
∂i+1
∂
i
Fi−1 → · · ·
F : · · · → Fi+1 −−−→ Fi −→
is said to lift to B, with lifting Fe, if there exists a preimage Fe of F
e
e
∂i+1
∂i e
Fi−1 → · · ·
Fe : · · · → Fei+1 −−−→ Fei −→
such that ∂ei−1 ∂ei = 0 for all i. A close connection between these two notions of
lifting will be explained in the next theorem. We want also to show that when
R = S/(x) for (x, x) a pair of exact zero-divisors, the triviality of the canonical
element [s] determines whether the module M lifts to S.
Theorem 4.2. Let R = S/(x) where S is a local ring and (x, x) is a pair of exact
zero-divisors in S. Then for every finitely generated R-module M , the following are
equivalent.
(1) M lifts to S.
(2) The canonical element [s] in Ext2R (M, M ) is trivial.
(3) Every free resolution of M by finitely generated free R-modules lifts to S.
(4) Some free resolution of M by finitely generated free R-modules lifts to S.
Proof. (1) =⇒ (2). Suppose that M ′ is a lifting of M to S. Let
e
e
∂2 e ∂1 e
F1 −→ F0 → 0
Fe : · · · → Fe2 −→
be a resolution of M ′ by finitely generated free S-modules. Since TorSi (M ′ , R) = 0
for all i > 0, F = Fe ⊗S R is a resolution of M ∼
= M ′ ⊗S R by finitely generated free
R-modules. Computing the endomorphism s from the preimage Fe of F , which is
exact, we see that s is actually the zero endomorphism, and is therefore certainly
trivial in Ext2R (M, M ).
HOMOLOGICAL ALGEBRA MODULO EXACT ZERO-DIVISORS
13
(2) =⇒ (3). By Lemma 4.1 the canonical element of Ext2R (M, M ) is trivial
regardless of which resolution by finitely generated free R-modules F of M we
choose to define it. Therefore let F be an arbitrary such resolution of M , and
let s be the canonical chain endomorphism defined as in (4) of the subsection
above on canonical endomorphisms of complexes. By assumption s is homotopic
to zero. Therefore there exists a homotopy h = {hi } with hi : Fi → Fi−1 such that
e
si = ∂i−1 hi + hi−1 ∂i for all i. Let Fe be an arbritrary preimage of F , with maps ∂.
e
e
e
e
e
Let hi : Fi → Fi−1 be a preimage of hi for all i. There exists ui : Fi → Fi−2 such
hi + e
hi−1 ∂ei + xui for all i. Now consider the preimage F ♯ of F where
that sei = ∂ei−1 e
♯
hi instead. we have
we take F = Fei for all i, but we take the maps ∂ ♯ = ∂ei − xe
i
i
♯
∂i−1
∂i♯
=
=
=
=
(∂ei−1 − xe
hi−1 )(∂ei − xe
hi )
hi + e
hi−1 ∂ei )
∂ei−1 ∂ei − x(∂ei−1 e
hi − e
hi−1 ∂ei ))
x(e
si − ∂ei−1 e
0.
Thus F ♯ is a lifting of F to S.
(3) =⇒ (4) is trivial. To show that (4) =⇒ (1), assume that F is a free
resolution of M by finitely generated free R-modules, which lifts to the complex Fe
over S. We claim that Hi (Fe ) = 0 for i 6= 0. Indeed, if ∂ei (a) = 0, some a ∈ Fei , then
a = ∂ei+1 (b) + xc for some b ∈ Fei+1 and c ∈ Fei by exactness of F . Since x∂ei (c) = 0,
we have ∂ei (c) ∈ xFei−1 . Again by exactness of F we have c = ∂ei+1 (d) + xe for some
d ∈ Fei+1 and e ∈ Fei . Therefore a = ∂ei+1 (b + xd). It follows that Fe is a resolution
of M ′ = H0 (Fe) by finitely generated free S-modules, and thus M ′ is a lifting of M
to S.
We end with an example showing that there are local rings S admitting a pair
of exact zero-divisors (x, x), but no local ring T with regular element x
e such that
S = T /(e
x2 ) and x = x
e + (e
x2 ). Therefore the notion of lifting modulo an exact
zero-divisor is a more general notion than lifting from modulo a regular element to
modulo the square of the regular element.
Example 4.3. Let k be field, S = k[V, X, Y, Z]/I where I is the ideal
(V 2 , Z 2 , XY, V X + XZ, V Y + Y Z, V X + Y 2 , V Y − X 2 ),
and set v = V + I. Then (v, v) is a pair of exact zero-divisors. Moreover, it is
shown in [AGP] that S does not have an embedded deformation. Therefore there
is no local ring T and non-zero-divisor Ve of T such that S ∼
= T /(Ve 2 ).
Acknowledgments
This paper is the result of a visit by the first and second authors to the third
in October/November 2010. They thank the Department of Mathematics at the
University of Texas at Arlington for their kind hospitality.
The authors thank the referee for his/her careful reading, diligence and helpful
suggestions.
14
PETTER ANDREAS BERGH, OLGUR CELIKBAS AND DAVID A. JORGENSEN
References
[ADS]
[Alp]
[AGP]
[Av1]
[Av2]
[Av3]
[AvBu]
[AHŞ]
[AV]
[Be]
[Dao1]
[Dao2]
[Eis]
[Gu1]
[Gu2]
[HeŞ]
[Jo1]
[Jo2]
[Rot]
M. Auslander, S. Ding, and Ø. Solberg, Liftings and weak liftings of modules, J. Algebra
156 (1993), 273–317.
J. L. Alperin, Periodicity in groups, Illinois J. Math., 21(4), 776-783, 1977.
L. Avramov, V. Gasharov and I. Peeva, A periodic module of infinite virtual projective
dimension, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 62 (1989), 1-5.
L. L. Avramov, Modules of finite virtual projective dimension, Invent. Math. 96 (1989),
no. 1, 71-101.
L. L. Avramov, Homological asymptotics of modules over local rings, Commutative algebra; Berkeley, 1987 (M. Hochster, C. Huneke, J. Sally, eds.), MSRI Publ. 15, Springer,
New York 1989, pp. 33-62.
L. L. Avramov, Infinite free resolutions, Six lectures on commutative algebra, Bellaterra
1996, Progr. Math. 166, Birkhäuser, Basel, (1998), 1-118.
L. L. Avramov and R.-O. Buchweitz, Support varieties and cohomology over complete
intersections, Invent. Math. 142 (2000), 285-318.
L. L. Avramov, I. B. D. A. Henriques and L. M. Şega, Quasi-complete intersection
homomorphisms, to appear in Pure and Applied Mathematics Quarterly, posted at
arXiv:1010.2143.
L.L. Avramov, O. Veliche, Stable cohomology over local rings, Adv. Math. 213 (2007),
no. 1, 93-139.
P. A. Bergh, On the vanishing of (co)homology over local rings, J. Pure Appl. Algebra
212 (2008), no. 1, 262-270.
H. Dao, Some observations on local and projective hypersurfaces, Math. Res. Lett., 15
(2008), 207-219.
H. Dao, Asymptotic behaviour of Tor over complete intersections and applications,
preprint, (2006), posted at arxiv:07105818.
D. Eisenbud, Homological algebra on a complete intersection, with an application to group
representations, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 260 (1980), no. 1, 35-64.
T. H. Gulliksen, A change of ring theorem with applications to Poincaré series and
intersection multiplicity, Math. Scand. 34 (1974), 167-183.
T. H. Gulliksen, On the deviations of a local ring, Math. Scand. 47 (1980), 5-20.
I. B. D. A. Henriques and L. M. Şega, Free resolutions over short Gorenstein local rings,
Math. Z. 267 (2011), 645-663.
D. A. Jorgensen, Tor and torsion on a complete intersection, J. Algebra 195 (1997),
526-537.
D. A. Jorgensen, Complexity and Tor on a complete intersection, J. Algebra 211 (1999),
578-598.
J. Rotman, An introduction to homological algebra, Universitext, Springer, New York,
second edition, 2009.
Petter Andreas Bergh, Institutt for matematiske fag, NTNU, N-7491 Trondheim,
Norway
E-mail address: [email protected]
Olgur Celikbas, Department of Mathematics, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS
66045, USA
Current address: Department of Mathematics, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211,
USA
E-mail address: [email protected]
David A. Jorgensen, Department of Mathematics, University of Texas at Arlington,
Arlington, TX 76019, USA
E-mail address: [email protected]
| 0math.AC
|
1
Common Throughput Maximization in
UAV-Enabled OFDMA Systems with Delay
Consideration
arXiv:1801.00444v2 [cs.IT] 6 Jan 2018
Qingqing Wu, Member, IEEE, and Rui Zhang, Fellow, IEEE
Abstract
The use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) as communication platforms is of great practical
significance in future wireless networks, especially for on-demand deployment in temporary events and
emergency situations. Although prior works have shown the performance improvement by exploiting the
UAV’s mobility, they mainly focus on delay-tolerant applications. As delay requirements fundamentally
limit the UAV’s mobility, it remains unknown whether the UAV is able to provide any performance gain
in delay-constrained communication scenarios. Motivated by this, we study in this paper a UAV-enabled
orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA) network where a UAV is dispatched as a mobile
base station (BS) to serve a group of users on the ground. We consider a minimum-rate ratio (MRR) for
each user, defined as the minimum instantaneous rate required over the average achievable throughput, to
flexibly adjust the percentage of its delay-constrained data traffic. Under a given set of constraints on the
users’ MRRs, we aim to maximize the minimum average throughput of all users by jointly optimizing the
UAV trajectory and OFDMA resource allocation. First, we show that the max-min throughput in general
decreases as the users’ MRR constraints become more stringent, which reveals a fundamental throughputdelay tradeoff in UAV-enabled communications. Next, we propose an iterative parameter-assisted block
coordinate descent method to optimize the UAV trajectory and OFDMA resource allocation alternately,
by applying the successive convex optimization and the Lagrange duality, respectively. Furthermore, an
efficient and systematic UAV trajectory initialization scheme is proposed based on a simple circular
trajectory. Finally, simulation results are provided to verify our theoretical findings and demonstrate the
effectiveness of our proposed designs.
Index Terms
The authors are with the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore,
email:{elewuqq, elezhang}@nus.edu.sg. Part of this work has been presented in IEEE APCC 2017 as an invited paper [1].
2
UAV communications, delay constraint, throughput maximization, trajectory design, OFDMA, resource allocation.
I. I NTRODUCTION
As predicted in [2], the number of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), also known as drones,
will continue to surge over the next several years, with the global annual unit shipment increasing
more than tenfold from 6.4 million in 2015 to 67.7 million by 2021. Such a dramatic increase is
due to the steadily decreasing cost of UAVs and their fast-growing demand in applications such as
surveillance and monitoring, aerial camera and radar, cargo delivery, communication platforms,
etc. In June 2017, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) and Intel announced to use UAVs
to enhance the future Olympic Games experience, such as the drone light show [3]. Just in the
same month, the “Safe DRONE Act of 2017” was proposed to the United States Congress for
accelerating the development of the UAV technology, which requested 14 million dollars for
funding a host of research projects on UAVs [4]. In fact, many prominent companies such as
Google, Qualcomm, Amazon, and Nokia, have already launched their respective programs to
advance the UAV research and conduct UAV field tests. In particular, the recent trial results
released by Qualcomm have shown that the current fourth-generation (4G) cellular network can
provide reliable communications for UAVs at an altitude up to 400 feet [5], which paves the
way for realizing cellular-enabled UAV communications in future. Besides being “drone clients”
of wireless networks, UAVs can also be employed as various aerial communication platforms,
to help improve the performance of existing wireless communication systems such as cellular
networks [6].
Compared to the traditional terrestrial wireless communications, UAV-enabled communications mainly have the following three advantages. First, they are significantly less affected by
channel impairments such as shadowing and fading, and in general possess more reliable airto-ground channels due to the much higher possibility of having line-of-sight (LoS) links with
ground users. Second, UAVs can be deployed more flexibly and moved more freely in the
three-dimensional (3D) space. Third, the high mobility of UAVs can be fully controlled to
enhance desired communication links and/or avoid undesired interference via proper trajectory
design. These features bring both opportunities and challenges in designing UAV-enabled wireless
communications, which were not explored before in conventional terrestrial systems with fixed
ground base stations (BSs) [6]. As UAVs are suitable to serve as airborne communication hubs
3
such as aerial BSs and/or relays, they are especially useful for the practical scenarios that require
on-demand deployment in temporary events or emergency situations (such as natural disaster),
when the ground infrastructures are insufficient or even unavailable. However, there are also
open challenges that need to be tackled before realizing the full potential of UAV-enabled
communications, such as UAV deployment and trajectory design, communications resource
allocation and multiple access, etc.
Recently, UAV deployment problems have been extensively studied in the literature [7]–[12].
The main design objective is to optimize the UAVs’ altitude, horizontal positions, and/or spatial
density to achieve the maximum communication coverage in a given area. However, the high
mobility or trajectory design of UAVs is not considered in these works. An energy-efficient
relaying scheme is proposed in [13] where multiple UAVs cooperatively relay data packets from
ground sensors to a remote BS based on time division multiple access (TDMA). Although the
UAV mobility is considered in [13], the UAVs’ trajectories are assumed to be pre-determined
and not optimized, which simplifies the design to a UAV-packet matching problem. In [14],
both the static and mobile UAV-enabled wireless networks are studied which are underlaid with
a device-to-device (D2D) communication network. Yet, the mobile UAV is only allowed to
communicate at a set of stop points. As a result, the UAV trajectory is highly restricted and does
not fully exploit the UAV’s high mobility for performance optimization. As such, a joint UAV
trajectory and adaptive communication design is more promising. Motivated by this, a general
trajectory and communication joint optimization framework is proposed in [15] for a UAVenabled mobile relaying system, which is also extended to the energy efficiency maximization
in a point-to-point UAV-ground communication system [16]. The UAV trajectory designs in [15]
and [16] can be considered as a generalization of the UAV deployment problem, subject to
practical constraints on the UAV’s mobility, such as its initial/final locations, maximum speed
and acceleration, etc. Thus, it is intuitive that a mobile UAV with optimized trajectory in general
can achieve higher throughput than a static UAV, even with optimal deployment/placement. For
UAV-enabled multiuser communication networks, a novel cyclical multiple access scheme is
proposed in [17] where the UAV periodically serves each of the ground users along its cyclical
trajectory via TDMA. In [18], a joint user scheduling, power control, and trajectory optimization
problem is investigated for a multi-UAV enabled multiuser system. It is shown that with joint
trajectory design and power control, the UAVs can cooperatively serve the ground users in a
periodic manner with strong LoS links and yet avoiding severe interference. However, this is
4
achieved by scheduling each user to communicate only when its associated UAV is sufficiently
close to it in each UAV flight period, which implies that the user has to wait for the next UAV
flight period to communicate again. As a result, the throughput gain brought by the UAV’s
mobility does not come for free but in fact at the cost of user communication delay.
Future wireless networks are expected to provide different quality-of-service (QoS) guarantees
for a wide range of applications with diversified requirements [19], [20]. In fact, the delay
requirements of wireless multimedia services may vary dramatically in a large scale from
milliseconds such as for video conferencing and online gaming, to several seconds for file
downloading/sharing and data backup. For example, when a user is downloading files which are
delay-tolerant in general, some other users in the same area may be watching high-definition (HD)
movies on YouTube that require minimum rates at any time. In light of this, wireless networks
with such mixed services should be optimized to not only maximize the system total throughput
but also meet the heterogeneous delay requirements of different applications. Although the UAV
trajectory design has been shown to significantly enhance the throughput of various wireless
communication systems such as for mobile relaying channel [13], [15], multiple access channel
(MAC) and broadcast channel (BC) [17], [21], [22], interference channel (IFC) [14], [18],
and wiretap channel [14], [23], all these works consider only delay-tolerant applications where
the users’ instantaneous rates in general cannot be guaranteed. Therefore, it remains unknown
whether mobile UAVs are still able to provide throughput gains over static UAVs/ground BSs,
when the users’ delay or minimum-rate requirements are considered.
Motivated by such an open question, we study in this paper a UAV-enabled orthogonal
frequency division multiple access (OFDMA) system, where a UAV is dispatched as a mobile
BS to serve a group of users on the ground during a given finite period, as shown in Fig. 1.
Besides having been standardized as the downlink multiple access scheme in the current 4G
networks, OFDMA is also deemed as a promising candidate for the forthcoming fifth-generation
(5G) wireless networks [24]–[26]. This is essentially attributed to its various advantages, e.g.,
flexible bandwidth and power allocation over users, which fits particularly well in our considered
UAV-enabled network with heterogeneous user delay requirements. Without loss of generality,
we consider two types of data traffic for each user: delay-constrained traffic where a minimum
rate should be supported at any time during the UAV service period versus delay-tolerant traffic
where no minimum rate is required and the transmission rate can be elastically allocated over the
period. To this end, we introduce a minimum-rate ratio (MRR) for each user which is defined as
5
Fig. 1. A UAV-enabled wireless network.
the minimum instantaneous rate required over the achievable average throughput of the whole
period. As such, the MRR can be flexibly adjusted by each user to specify the percentage of the
delay-constrained traffic required versus that of the delay-tolerant traffic, depending on real-time
applications. Our goal is to maximize the minimum average throughput of all ground users while
meeting a given set of constraints on the users’ MRRs, by jointly optimizing the UAV trajectory
and OFDMA resource allocation. Compared to prior works [13]–[18], [21], [27], [28], such a
joint UAV trajectory and resource allocation design is more general and practically useful since
the user communication delay requirements are taken into account. This thus leads to a more fair
throughput comparison with the terrestrial BSs or static UAVs and also helps to reveal a better
understanding of the fundamental throughput gain achievable by exploiting the UAV’s mobility
control subject to delay constraints. Intuitively, when the UAV flies towards some users to capture
better channels with them, it gets farther away spontaneously from other users that are not in
its heading direction and thus experiences degraded channels. As a result, more bandwidth and
transmit power need to be allocated to those users so that their minimum rates can be achieved.
This in turn would limit the potential rate increase of the users in the UAV’s heading direction.
Thus, there exists a new and non-trivial tradeoff in the UAV trajectory design for throughput
maximization when minimum-rate or delay constraints are considered.
The main contributions of this paper are summarized as follows. First, we formulate a joint
UAV trajectory and OFDMA resource allocation optimization problem to maximize the minimum
6
throughput of ground users while guaranteeing their specified MRR constraints. Next, we show
that the system max-min throughput is non-increasing with respect to the users’ MRRs, which
implies that the throughput gain of mobile UAVs over static UAVs reduces as the delay constraints
become more stringent. Although the formulated problem is non-convex and challenging to solve,
we propose an efficient iterative block coordinate descent algorithm to solve the bandwidth
and power allocation problem and the UAV trajectory optimization problem alternately, which
is guaranteed to converge. Specifically, in each iteration, the bandwidth and power allocation
problem is solved optimally by applying the Lagrange duality method with given fixed UAV
trajectory. While for the UAV trajectory optimization problem with fixed OFDMA resource
allocation, the successive convex optimization technique is applied to tackle its non-convexity.
However, due to the MRR constraints, it is shown that the conventional block coordinate descent
method which directly iterates between the OFDMA resource allocation and UAV trajectory
design will very likely get stuck at the initial point, which leads to an ineffective update of the
UAV trajectory. To overcome this issue, we propose a new parameter-assisted block coordinate
descent method where each parameter is a temporary MRR set to be larger than the target MRR
for a corresponding user. Then at each iteration, we gradually decrease the temporary MRRs
before solving the UAV trajectory optimization problem, until they reach the target MRRs for
all users. It is shown that this new method can effectively update the UAV trajectory in each
iteration, thus resolving the issue of conventional block coordinate descent method. Furthermore,
we propose a systematic and low-complexity UAV trajectory initialization scheme based on
the simple circular trajectory. Finally, numerical results are provided to verify the fundamental
tradeoff between the system max-min throughput and the users’ delay/MRR constraints and
demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed designs.
The rest of this paper is organized as follows. Section II introduces the system model and
the problem formulation for a UAV-enabled OFDMA network. In Section III, we propose an
efficient iterative algorithm as well as a general UAV trajectory initialization scheme for the
considered problem. Section VI presents the numerical results to demonstrate the performance
of the proposed designs. Finally, we conclude the paper in Section VI.
Notations: In this paper, scalars are denoted by italic letters, while vectors and matrices are
respectively denoted by bold-face lower-case and upper-case letters. RM ×1 denotes the space
of M-dimensional real-valued vector. For a vector a, kak represents its Euclidean norm, aT
denotes its transpose, and a 0 indicates that a is element-wise larger than or equal to 0. For
7
a time-dependent function x(t), ẋ(t) denotes its derivative with respect to time t. For a set K,
|K| denotes its cardinality.
II. S YSTEM M ODEL
AND
P ROBLEM F ORMULATION
A. System Model
As shown in Fig. 1, we consider a UAV-enabled OFDMA system where the UAV is employed
as an aerial BS to serve a group of K users on the ground. The user set is denoted by K with
|K| = K. In practice, the users that need to be served by the UAV can be either the terrestrial
BSs that have no ground backhaul links or the ground mobile terminals in a geographical area
that is poorly or not even covered by existing terrestrial BSs. At any time during the UAV flight
period, denoted by T , the UAV can communicate with multiple ground users simultaneously by
employing OFDMA, i.e., assigning each user a fraction of the total bandwidth/transmit power. In
general, from the perspective of throughput maximization, it is intuitive that larger T is desirable
since it will provide the UAV more time to fly closer to each ground user, leading to better airto-ground links. The effect of T on the system performance will be investigated in detail in
Section IV. Since we target for a centralized design that is implemented off-line, the proposed
algorithm can be performed at a central controller (e.g., installed on the UAV) who is able to
collect all the users’ information such as their locations and MRRs. Then the obtained solutions
can be programmed into the control and communication units of the UAV.
We assume that the horizontal coordinate of each ground user is known in advance and fixed
at wk = [xk , yk ]T ∈ R2×1 , k ∈ K. The UAV is assumed to fly at a fixed altitude H above
ground and the time-varying horizontal coordinate of the UAV at time instant t is denoted by
q(t) = [x(t), y(t)]T ∈ R2×1 , with 0 ≤ t ≤ T . To serve ground users periodically, we assume that
the UAV needs to return to its initial location by the end of each period T , i.e., q(0) = q(T ).
In addition, the UAV trajectory is also subject to the maximum speed constraints in practice,
i.e, ||q̇(t)|| ≤ Vmax , 0 ≤ t ≤ T , where Vmax denotes the maximum UAV speed in meter/second
(m/s). However, the continuous variable t essentially implies an infinite number of UAV speed
constraints which are difficult to tackle in general. To facilitate our analysis and algorithm design,
we apply the discrete linear state-space approximation technique, which results in a finite number
of constraints. Specifically, we discretize the UAV flight period T into N equally-spaced time
slots with step size δt , i.e., t = nδt , n ∈ N = {1, ..., N}. Note that for the given maximum
UAV speed Vmax and altitude H, the number of time slots N can be chosen sufficiently large
8
such that the UAV’s location change within each time slot δt can be assumed to be negligible,
compared to the link distances from the UAV to all ground users. However, a larger value of N
inevitably increases the complexity of the proposed design. Thus, the number of time slots N
can be properly chosen in practice to balance between the accuracy and algorithm complexity.
More discussions on the choice of N as well as its impact on the system performance can be
found in [18]. Based on such a discretization, the UAV trajectory can be characterized by a
sequence of UAV locations q[n] = [x[n], y[n]]T , n = 1, · · · , N. As a result, the above constraints
can be equivalently modeled as
q[1] = q[N],
2
||q[n + 1] − q[n]||2 ≤ Smax
, n = 1, ..., N − 1,
(1)
(2)
where Smax , Vmax δt is the maximum horizontal distance that the UAV can travel within one
time slot. Furthermore, the distance from the UAV to user k in time slot n is assumed to be a
constant that can be expressed as
dk [n] =
p
H 2 + ||q[n] − wk ||2.
(3)
The measurement results in [29]–[31] have shown that the air-to-ground communication
channels are mainly dominated by the LoS links even when the UAV is at a moderate altitude.
For example, for the UAV at an altitude of H = 120 m, the LoS probability of air-to-ground
links in rural environment exceeds 95% for a horizontal ground distance of 4 kilometers (Km)
[29]. Thus, we assume that the channel quality depends mainly on the UAV-user distance for
simplicity. In addition, the Doppler effect induced by the UAV mobility is assumed to be perfectly
compensated at the receivers. Following the free-space path loss model, the channel power gain
from the UAV to user k in time slot n can thus be expressed as
hk [n] = ρ0 d−2
k [n] =
ρ0
,
H 2 + ||q[n] − wk ||2
(4)
where ρ0 denotes the channel power gain at the reference distance d0 = 1 m. Denote the total
available system bandwidth by B in Hertz (Hz). The fraction of bandwidth assigned to user k
in time slot n is denoted by αk [n]. In a practical OFDMA system, αk [n] is in general a discrete
value between 0 and 1, which increases linearly with the number of subcarriers assigned to user
k in time slot n. It is known that when the number of subcarriers is sufficiently large, αk [n]
9
can be approximated to a continuous value between 0 and 1. Thus, the bandwidth allocation
constraint can be expressed as
K
X
αk [n] ≤ 1, ∀ n,
(5)
k=1
0 ≤ αk [n] ≤ 1, ∀ k, n.
(6)
Denote the transmit power allocated to user k in time slot n by pk [n] ≥ 0. Then the total transmit
power constraint of the UAV can be expressed as
K
X
pk [n] ≤ Pmax , ∀ n,
(7)
k=1
where Pmax is the maximum allowed transmit power of the UAV in each time slot. Accordingly,
the instantaneous achievable rate of user k in time slot n, denoted by rk [n] in bits/second/Hz
(bps/Hz), can be expressed as
pk [n]hk [n]
rk [n] = αk [n] log2 1 +
αk [n]BN0
pk [n]γ0
,
= αk [n] log2 1 +
αk [n](H 2 + ||q[n] − wk ||2 )
where γ0 ,
ρ0
,
BN0
(8)
with N0 denoting the power spectral density of the additive white Gaussian
noise (AWGN) at the receivers. As a result, the average achievable throughput of user k over
N time slots in bps/Hz, is given by
N
1 X
Rk =
rk [n].
N n=1
(9)
Motivated by the diversified user applications and heterogeneous delay requirements in the
forthcoming 5G wireless networks, we consider both delay-constrained and delay-tolerant services for users in the system. Specifically, a parameter θk , θk ∈ [0 1], is introduced to denote the
MRR of user k, which means that at any time slot, θk fraction of its average throughput over
N slots is delay-constrained and the remaining 1 − θk fraction is delay-tolerant. In particular,
θk = 0 and θk = 1 indicate that all the services of user k are delay-tolerant and delay-constrained,
respectively. As such, the MRR constraint of user k in time slot n can be expressed as
rk [n] ≥ θk Rk , ∀ k, n,
(10)
which implies that in any of the N time slots, at least θk fraction of the average throughput
needs to be satisfied for each user k. Therefore, a system where some users’ services are all
10
delay-constrained while those of the others are all delay-tolerant, i.e., θk ∈ {0, 1}, ∀ k, is a special
case of our general setup.
B. Problem Formulation
Let A = {αk [n], k ∈ K, n ∈ N }, P = {pk [n], k ∈ K, n ∈ N }, and Q = {q[n], n ∈ N }. By
taking into account the MRR constraints of all users, we aim to maximize the minimum average
throughput among them via jointly optimizing the bandwidth and power allocation (i.e., A and
P) as well as the UAV trajectory (i.e., Q). Define η , min Rk . The optimization problem is
k∈K
formulated as
max
η,A,P,Q
s.t.
η
(11a)
Rk ≥ η, ∀ k,
(11b)
rk [n] ≥ θk Rk , ∀ k, n,
(11c)
K
X
pk [n] ≤ Pmax , ∀ n,
(11d)
k=1
pk [n] ≥ 0, ∀ k, n,
K
X
αk [n] ≤ 1, ∀ n,
(11e)
(11f)
k=1
0 ≤ αk [n] ≤ 1, ∀ k, n,
(11g)
2
||q[n + 1] − q[n]||2 ≤ Smax
, n = 1, ..., N − 1,
(11h)
q[1] = q[N].
(11i)
Note that the challenges of solving problem (11) lie in the following three aspects. First, Rk
and rk [n] in constraints (11b) and (11c) are not jointly concave with respect to the optimization
variables A, P, and Q. Second, for fixed UAV trajectory Q, although Rk and rk [n] are jointly
concave with respect to A and P, (11c) is non-convex due to the presence of Rk in its left-handside (LHS). Third, for fixed bandwidth and power allocation A and P, Rk and rk [n] are neither
convex nor concave with respect to Q. Consequently, problem (11) is a non-convex optimization
problem and in general, there is no standard method for solving such a problem efficiently.
11
To tackle the above challenges, we first transform problem (11) into a more tractable form as
follows,
max
η,A,P,Q
s.t.
η
(12a)
rk [n] ≥ θk η, ∀ k, n,
(12b)
(11b), (11d), (11e), (11f), (11g), (11h), (11i).
(12c)
Comparing (12b) with (11c), it follows that the feasible set of problem (11) is a subset of that
of problem (12) in general. However, the equivalence of problems (11) and (12) holds if all
users achieve the equal average throughput in the optimal solution to problem (11). This can be
easily verified since otherwise the objective value of (11) can be further improved by allocating
more transmit power and/or bandwidth to the user with a lower average throughput without
violating the total transmit power and bandwidth allocation constraints (11d) and (11f). With
such a transformation, we only need to focus on solving problem (12) in the rest of the paper.
Although it is still a non-convex optimization problem, problem (12) facilitates the development
of an efficient algorithm. Before proceeding to solve problem (12), we first show the effect of
the users’ MRRs on the maximum objective value of problem (12).
Theorem 1. The maximum objective value of problem (12) is an element-wise non-increasing
function with respect to {θk }.
Proof. Denote the optimal solutions of problem (12) with θ ∗ = {θk∗ , k ∈ K} and θ̂ = {θ̂k , k ∈ K}
by S ∗ = {η ∗ , αk∗ [n], p∗k [n], q∗ [n], k ∈ K, n ∈ N } and Ŝ = {η̂, α̂k [n], p̂k [n], q̂[n], k ∈ K, n ∈ N },
respectively. To prove Theorem 1, we only need to show that η ∗ ≤ η̂ holds when θ̂ θ ∗ , where
indicates element-wisely less than or equal to, i.e., θ̂k ≤ θk∗ , ∀ k. Note that in problem (12),
the MRRs are only involved in constraint (12b). Thus, we have the following inequalities
p∗k [n]γ0
∗
∗
≥ θk∗ η ∗ ≥ θ̂k η ∗ , ∀ k, n,
(13)
rk [n] = αk [n] log2 1 + ∗
αk [n](H 2 + ||q∗ [n] − wk ||2 )
which implies that S ∗ is also a feasible solution of problem (12) with θ̂. Since η̂ is the maximum
objective value of problem (12) with θ̂, it follows that η ∗ ≤ η̂, which thus completes the proof
of Theorem 1.
Theorem 1 sheds light on the fundamental tradeoff between the max-min average throughput
and the user communication delay requirement: as the required MRR θk increases for any user
12
k, the max-min average throughput of the system decreases in general. This is because imposing
more stringent minimum-rate requirements on users fundamentally limit the UAV’s mobility to
fly closer to any user to achieve a better channel since at the same time it needs to meet the
minimum-rate requirements of other users that are not in its heading direction and thus will
have degraded channels with it. As a result, the degree of freedom for exploiting the UAV’s
mobility via its trajectory design is restricted by such delay/MRR constraints, thus leading to
lower max-min average throughput.
III. P ROPOSED S OLUTION
In this section, we propose an efficient parameter-assisted block coordinate descent algorithm
for solving problem (12). Specifically, we first optimize the bandwidth and power allocation
for given UAV trajectory and then optimize the UAV trajectory for given bandwidth and power
allocation. These two optimization problems are solved alternately until convergence is achieved.
A. Joint Bandwidth and Power Allocation
Besides being a subproblem of problem (12), the bandwidth and power allocation optimization
problem for given UAV trajectory may also correspond to a practical scenario when the UAV
trajectory is pre-specified due to other tasks such as aerial imaging, rather than being optimized
for achieving best communication performance. Specifically, for any given UAV trajectory Q,
the bandwidth and power allocation {A, P} can be optimized by solving the following problem,
13
max
η
η,A,P
(14a)
N
pk [n]gk [n]
1 X
αk [n] log2 1 +
≥ η, ∀ k,
s.t.
N n=1
αk [n]
pk [n]gk [n]
αk [n] log2 1 +
≥ θk η, ∀ k, n,
αk [n]
K
X
(14b)
(14c)
pk [n] ≤ Pmax , ∀ n,
(14d)
k=1
pk [n] ≥ 0, ∀ k, n,
K
X
(14e)
αk [n] ≤ 1, ∀ n,
(14f)
k=1
0 ≤ αk [n] ≤ 1, ∀ k, n,
(14g)
k [n]
k [n]
where gk [n] , hBN
, 0 when αk [n] = 0, ∀ k, n, such that
. Define αk [n] log2 1 + pk α[n]g
0
k [n]
the LHSs of both (14b) and (14c) are continuous with respect to αk [n] over the whole
domain 0 ≤
k [n]
αk [n] ≤ 1. As such, problem (14) is a convex optimization problem since αk [n] log2 1 + pk α[n]g
k [n]
in (14b) and (14c) is jointly concave with respect to αk [n] and pk [n] and (14d)-(14g) are all
affine constraints. Furthermore, it can be verified that Slater’s constraint qualification is satisfied
for problem (14) [32]. Therefore, strong duality holds and the duality gap between problem
(14) and its dual problem is thus zero, which means that the optimal solution can be obtained
efficiently by applying the Lagrange duality. The partial Lagrange function of problem (14) can
be expressed as
L(η, A, P, λ, µ, β, ν)
=η +
K
X
λk
k=1
N
1 X
pk [n]gk [n]
−η
αk [n] log2 1 +
N n=1
αk [n]
!
+
N
X
βn Pmax −
n=1
K
X
k=1
pk [n]
!
!
X
K
N
X
pk [n]gk [n]
αk [n]
− θk η +
νn 1 −
+
µk,n αk [n] log2 1 +
αk [n]
n=1
k=1
k=1 n=1
!
K X
N
K
K X
N
X
X
X
λk
pk [n]gk [n]
= 1−
λk −
µk,n θk η +
+ µk,n αk [n] log2 1 +
N
αk [n]
n=1
n=1
K X
N
X
k=1
−
K X
N
X
k=1 n=1
k=1
k=1
βn pk [n] −
K X
N
X
k=1 n=1
νn αk [n] +
N
X
n=1
βn Pmax +
N
X
νn ,
(15)
n=1
where λ = {λk , ∀ k}, µ = {µk,n, ∀ k, n}, β = {βn , ∀ n}, and ν = {νn , ∀ n} are the non-negative
Lagrange multipliers associated with constraints (14b), (14c), (14d), and (14f), respectively. The
14
boundary constraints (14e) and (14g) will be absorbed into the optimal solution in the following.
Accordingly, the dual function is given by
f (λ, µ, β, ν) = max L(η, A, P, λ, µ, β, ν)
η,A,P
s.t.
(16a)
pk [n] ≥ 0, ∀ k, n,
(16b)
0 ≤ αk [n] ≤ 1, ∀ k, n,
(16c)
for which the following lemma holds.
Lemma 1. To make f (λ, µ, β, ν) bounded from the above in (16), i.e., f (λ, µ, β, ν) < +∞, it
P
PK PN
follows that K
n=1 µk,n θk = 1 must hold.
k=1 λk −
k=1
PK
PK PN
PK
Proof. This is shown by contradiction. If
k=1 λk −
n=1 µk,n θk > 1 or
k=1
k=1 λk −
PK PN
n=1 µk,n θk < 1, it follows that f (λ, µ, β, ν) → +∞ by setting η → −∞ or η → +∞.
k=1
Thus, neither of the above two inequalities can be true and the lemma is proved.
Lemma 1 imposes additional constraints for dual variables λ and µ. As such, the dual problem
of problem (14) is given by
min f (λ, µ, β, ν)
(17a)
λ,µ,β,ν
s.t.
K
X
λk −
K X
N
X
µk,n θk = 1,
(17b)
λ 0, µ 0, β 0, ν 0.
(17c)
k=1
k=1 n=1
Next, we show how to obtain the primal optimal solution by applying the Lagrange duality.
1) Obtaining f (λ, µ, β, ν) by Solving Problem (16) : With the given dual variables, problem
(16) can be decomposed into KN + 1 subproblems that can be solved independently in parallel. Specifically, one subproblem is for optimizing η and the other KN subproblems are for
optimizing A and P, i.e.,
max
η
max
αk [n],pk [n]
s.t.
1−
K
X
k=1
λk −
K X
N
X
k=1 n=1
µk,n θk
!
η,
pk [n]gk [n]
λk
− βn pk [n] − νn αk [n]
+ µk,n αk [n] log2 1 +
N
αk [n]
(18)
(19a)
pk [n] ≥ 0, ∀ k, n,
(19b)
0 ≤ αk [n] ≤ 1, ∀ k, n,
(19c)
15
P
where each subproblem in (19) is for user k in time slot n. For problem (18), since K
k=1 λk −
PK PN
n=1 µk,n θk = 1 holds as in Lemma 1, the objective value is zero which is independent of
k=1
the value of η. This implies that we can choose any arbitrary real number as the optimal solution,
denoted by η ⋆ . Without loss of generality, we simply set η ⋆ = 0 for the purpose of obtaining the
dual function f (λ, µ, β, ν) and updating the dual variables1. Next, we consider problem (19).
Since problem (19) is jointly concave with respect to pk [n] and αk [n], the solution that satisfies
the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) conditions is also the optimal solution. By taking the derivative
of the objective function of (19) with respect to pk [n], the optimal power allocation, denoted by
p⋆k [n], can be obtained as
+
1
λk + Nµk,n
−
,
(20)
= αk [n]
Nβn ln 2
gk [n]
i+
h
p⋆ [n]
λk +N µk,n
1
where [x]+ , max{x, 0}. Let pek [n] , αkk [n] = N
−
, which can be regarded as the
βn ln 2
gk [n]
p⋆k [n]
power spectrum density of user k in time slot n. Note that in (20), the power allocation follows
a multi-level water-filling structure. Substituting the obtained p⋆k [n] into problem (19) yields
λk + Nµk,n
log2 (1 + pek [n]gk [n]) − βn pek [n] − νn αk [n]
(21a)
max
αk [n]
N
s.t.
0 ≤ αk [n] ≤ 1, ∀ k, n.
(21b)
It is evident that problem (21) is a linear program (LP) with only one optimization variable,
αk [n]. Thus, the optimal bandwidth allocation, denoted by αk⋆ [n], can be obtained as
λk + Nµk,n
1,
if
log2 (1 + pek [n]gk [n]) − βn pek [n] − νn > 0,
N
⋆
λk + Nµk,n
αk [n] = a,
if
log2 (1 + pek [n]gk [n]) − βn pek [n] − νn = 0,
N
0,
otherwise, ∀ k, n.
(22)
where a can be any arbitrary real number between 0 and 1 since the objective value of problem
(21) is not affected in this case. For simplicity, we set a = 0 as for the case of η. In general, (22)
cannot provide the optimal primal solution for problem (14) even with optimal dual variables.
Nevertheless, with the above proposed solutions to problems (18) and (19), the dual function
f (λ, µ, β, ν) is obtained.
1
We note that η ⋆ = 0 cannot be the optimal primal solution to problem (14). How to obtain the optimal primal solution for
this problem will be discussed later in Section III-A-3).
16
2) Obtaining Optimal Dual Solution to Problem (17) : After obtaining (η ⋆ , A⋆ , P⋆ ) for given
λ, µ, β, and ν, we next solve the dual problem (17) to find the optimal dual variables that
maximize f (λ, µ, β, ν). Note that although the dual function f (λ, µ, β, ν) is always convex by
definition, it is non-differentiable in general. As a result, the commonly used subgradient based
method such as the ellipsoid method, can be used to solve problem (17). In each iteration, the dual
variables λ, µ, β, and ν are updated based on the subgradients of both the objective function and
the constraint functions in problem (17). Specifically, the subgradient of the objective function
is denoted by s0 = [∆λT , ∆µT , ∆β T , ∆ν T ]T where ∆λ, ∆µ, ∆β, and ∆ν are vectors with the
elements respectively given by
N
pk [n]gk [n]
1 X
, ∀ k,
αk [n] log2 1 +
∆λk =
N n=1
αk [n]
pk [n]gk [n]
∆µk,n = αk [n] log2 1 +
, ∀ k, n,
αk [n]
∆βn = Pmax −
K
X
pk [n], ∀ n,
(23)
(24)
(25)
k=1
∆νn = 1 −
K
X
αk [n], ∀ n.
(26)
k=1
Furthermore, the equality constraint in (17b) is equivalent to two inequality constraints: 1 −
PK PN
PK
PK PN
PK
λ
+
µ
θ
≤
0
and
−1
+
λ
−
k
k,n
k
k
n=1 µk,n θk ≤ 0. Thus, the
k=1
k=1
n=1
k=1
k=1
subgradient of the former constraint function is denoted by s1 = [∆λT , ∆µT , ∆β T , ∆ν T ]T
where the corresponding elements are given by ∆λk = −1, ∆µk,n = −θk , ∆βn = 0, ∆νn = 0. In
addition, the subgradient of the latter constraint function is given by s2 = −s1 . With the above
subgradients, the dual variables can be updated by the constrained ellipsoid method toward the
optimal solution with global convergence [33].
3) Constructing Optimal Primal Solution to Problem (14) : Based on the obtained dual optimal solution λ∗ , µ∗ , β ∗ , and ν ∗ , it remains to obtain the optimal primal solution {η ∗ , A∗, P∗ } to
problem (14). It is worth pointing out that for a convex optimization problem, the optimal solution
that maximizes the Lagrangian function is the optimal primal solution if and only if such a solution is unique and primal feasible [32]. However, in our case, the optimal solutions η ⋆ and A⋆ that
P
PK PN
maximize L(η, A, P, λ, µ, β, ν) are not unique given that K
n=1 µk,n θk = 1 and
k=1 λk −
k=1
λk +N µk,n
log2 (1 + pek [n]gk [n]) − βn pek [n] − µn = 0 as in (18) and (22). Therefore, additional
N
steps are needed in order to construct the optimal primal solution. The key observation is that
17
Algorithm 1 Joint bandwidth and power allocation algorithm for solving problem (14).
1: Initialize λ, µ, β, ν, and the ellipsoid.
2:
repeat
3:
Solve problem (18) and (19) to obtain η ⋆ , A⋆ , and P⋆ .
4:
Compute the subgradients of the objective function and the constraint functions in problem
(17).
5:
Update λ, µ, β, and ν by using the constrained ellipsoid method.
6:
until λ, µ, β, and ν converge within a prescribed accuracy.
7:
Set (λ∗ , µ∗ , β ∗ , ν ∗ ) ← (λ, µ, β, ν).
8:
Obtain η ∗ , A∗ , and P∗ by solving problem (27) and using (20).
with given λ∗ , µ∗ , and β ∗ , the optimal power spectrum density (the ratio of the optimal power
allocation to the optimal bandwidth allocation), i.e., pe∗k [n] =
p∗k [n]
,
α∗k [n]
can be uniquely obtained
from (20). By substituting pe∗k [n] into the primal problem (14), we have
max
η,A
s.t.
η
N
1 X
αk [n] log2 (1 + pe∗k [n]gk [n]) ≥ η, ∀ k,
N n=1
αk [n] log2 (1 + pe∗k [n]gk [n]) ≥ θk η, ∀ k, n,
K
X
(27a)
(27b)
(27c)
αk [n]e
p∗k [n] ≤ Pmax , ∀ n,
(27d)
αk [n] ≤ 1, ∀ n,
(27e)
k=1
K
X
k=1
0 ≤ αk [n] ≤ 1, ∀ k, n.
(27f)
Given pe∗k [n], it is easy to observe that problem (27) is an LP with respect to A and η, which
thus can be efficiently solved by using standard convex optimization solvers such as CVX [34].
After obtaining the optimal bandwidth allocation A∗ , the corresponding power allocation P∗
can be obtained as p∗k [n] = pe∗k [n]αk∗ [n], ∀ k, n. The details of the procedures for obtaining the
optimal solution to problem (14) are summarized in Algorithm 1. The computational complexity
of Algorithm 1 consists of three parts. The first part is for solving problems (18) and (19), the
second part is for updating the dual variables by the ellipsoid method, and the third part is
18
for solving linear program problem (27). In step 3) of Algorithm 1, the complexity of solving
problem (18) is O(1) and that of solving (19) is O(KN). The complexities of step 4) and 5) are
O(KN) and O(K 2N 2 ), respectively. Since the ellipsoid method takes O(K 2 N 2 ) to converge, the
total complexity for step 2) to 6) is O(K 4 N 4 ) [33]. The complexity of solving (27) is O(K 3 N 3 ).
Therefore, the total complexity of Algorithm 1 is O(K 4N 4 ).
B. UAV Trajectory Optimization
Given any feasible bandwidth and power allocation {A, P}, problem (12) is simplified into
the following problem for optimizing the UAV trajectory Q only, i.e.,
max
η
η,Q
(28a)
N
γk [n]
1 X
αk [n] log2 1 + 2
≥ η, ∀ k,
s.t.
N n=1
H + ||q[n] − wk ||2
γk [n]
αk [n] log2 1 + 2
≥ θk η, ∀ k, n,
H + ||q[n] − wk ||2
where γk [n] ,
(28b)
(28c)
2
||q[n + 1] − q[n]||2 ≤ Smax
, n = 1, ..., N − 1,
(28d)
q[1] = q[N],
(28e)
pk [n]ρ0
.
αk [n]BN0
Note that problem (28) is not a convex optimization problem since the
LHSs of constraints (28b) and (28c) are not concave with respect to q[n]. In general, there is
no efficient method to obtain the optimal solution for such a non-convex problem. However,
we observe that the LHSs of both (28b) and (28c) are convex with respect to ||q[n] − wk ||2 .
Note that for a convex function, its first-order Taylor expansion is the global under-estimator at
any point [32]. This thus motivates us to leverage the successive convex optimization technique
to tackle the non-convex problem (28) by an iterative algorithm, where in each iteration, the
LHSs of both (28b) and (28c) are replaced by more tractable functions derived from the Taylor
expansion at a given local point. Specifically, with given local point qr [n], we have the following
inequality
rk [n] = αk [n] log2 1 +
γ0
2
H + ||q[n] − wk ||2
≥ αk [n] −Ark [n] ||q[n] − wk ||2 − ||qr [n] − wk ||2 + Bkr [n]
, rklb,r [n],
(29)
19
where
Ark [n] =
(H 2
||qr [n]
+
Bkr [n] = log2 1 +
− wk
γ0 log2 e
2
|| )(H 2 + ||qr [n]
γ0
2
r
H + ||q [n] − wk ||2
− wk ||2 + γ0 )
,
(30)
, ∀ k, n.
(31)
For any given local point Qr , define the function η lb,r (A, Q) = min
i∈K
PN
lb,r
n=1 rk [n].
With
the lower bounds rklb,r [n], ∀ k, in (29) and Qr , problem (28) is approximated as the following
problem
η lb,r
max
ηlb,r ,Q
N
1 X lb,r
r [n] ≥ η lb,r , ∀ k,
s.t.
N n=1 k
(32a)
rklb,r [n] ≥ θk η lb,r , ∀ k, n,
(32b)
2
||q[n + 1] − q[n]||2 ≤ Smax
, n = 1, ..., N − 1,
(32c)
q[1] = q[N].
(32d)
Note that constraints (32a), (32b), and (32c) are all convex quadratic constraints and (32d) is a
linear constraint. Therefore, problem (32) is a convex quadratically constrained quadratic program
(QCQP) that can be solved within a polynomial complexity by standard convex optimization
solvers such as CVX [34]. It is worth pointing out that due to the lower bounds adopted from
(29), constraints (32a) and (32b) imply (28b) and (28c), respectively, but the reverse does not
hold in general. In this regard, the optimal objective value obtained by solving problem (32)
always serves as a lower bound for that of problem (28).
C. Overall Algorithm Design
In this section, we propose an efficient iterative algorithm to solve problem (12) based on the
results in previous two sections. Note that the conventional block coordinate descent method
alternately optimizes one block of optimization variables in each iteration while keeping other
blocks of optimization variables fixed, until the convergence is achieved [35], [36]. However,
directly applying such a block coordinate descent method for our considered problem, i.e., by
alternately optimizing one block from the power and bandwidth allocation variables {A, P} in
problem (14) and the UAV trajectory variables Q in problem (28), with the other block fixed,
20
may fail to update the UAV trajectory effectively. This can be observed from the MRR constraints
in problem (28), i.e.,
αk [n] log2 1 +
γk [n]
2
H + ||q[n] − wk ||2
≥ θk η, ∀ k, n.
(33)
For given αk [n] and pk [n], ∀ k, n, since problem (28) aims to increase η by optimizing UAV
trajectory q[n], the right-hand-side (RHS) of (33) is expected to increase after each iteration. As
a result, for users that have met constraints in (14c) with equality in the last iteration, the only
way to increase the LHS of (33) in the current iteration is by decreasing ||q[n] − wk ||2 , ∀ k. This
implies that in each time slot n, the UAV’s location q[n] needs to be updated to decrease the
distances from the UAV to all these users. Thus, the freedom for optimizing the UAV trajectory
is severely limited which can lead to ineffective update of the UAV trajectory in each iteration.
To tackle this issue, we propose a new parameter-assisted block coordinate descent method
where each parameter is a temporary MRR for a corresponding user k, denoted by θtemp,k , which
is set larger than the actual MRR target θk , if 0 < θk < 1. The main idea is to use the newly
introduced temporary MRR θtemp,k > θk for solving problem (28) rather than directly using the
target θk . Specifically, θtemp,k for each user k is gradually decreased before solving problem (28)
in each iteration, until the target MRR θk is achieved for all users. As such, η will increase
after each iteration, while the constraints in (33) will be relaxed due to the decrease of θtemp,k ’s,
which thus permits a more effective UAV trajectory update in each iteration compared to the
conventional block coordinate decent method. Furthermore, the proposed method also generates
a feasible solution for the original problem (12) since θk will be eventually achieved by gradually
decreasing θtemp,k with a predefined step size, θstep,k > 0. The details of the proposed method
are summarized in Algorithm 2.
The convergence of the proposed Algorithm 2 can be analyzed as follows. From step 4, it
can be seen that θk , ∀ k, is non-increasing over the iterations. Recall that the objective value of
problem (12) is element-wise non-increasing with respect to θk , ∀ k. Thus, it can be shown that
the objective value achieved by Algorithm 2 is non-decreasing in each iteration. Furthermore,
the objective value of problem (12) is bounded from the above. Thus, the proposed Algorithm
2 is guaranteed to converge and the obtained solution is also feasible for the original problem
(11). Although the obtained solution is generally suboptimal, we validate the effectiveness of
Algorithm 2 via simulations by comparing with other benchmark schemes in Section IV.
21
Algorithm 2 Parameter-assisted block coordinate descent algorithm for solving problem (12).
1:
Initialize Q0 , θini,k , and Lmax . Let r = 0, θtemp,k = θini,k , and θstep,k =
2:
repeat
3:
θini,k −θk
,
Lmax
∀ k.
Solve problem (14) by applying Algorithm 1 for given Qr , and denote the optimal solution
as {Ar+1, Pr+1 }.
4:
θtemp,k = max{θtemp,k − (r + 1)θstep,k , θk }, ∀ k.
5:
Solve problem (28) for given {Ar+1, Pr+1 , Qr , θtemp,k }, and denote the optimal solution
as {Qr+1 }.
6:
7:
Update r = r + 1.
until θtemp,k = θk , ∀ k, and the fractional increase of the objective value is below a threshold
ǫ > 0.
D. UAV Initial Trajectory and Users’ MRR Initialization
In Algorithm 2, the initial UAV trajectory, Q0 = {q0 [n], ∀ n}, and the initial temporary users’
MRRs, θini,k , ∀ k, need to be set. First, we propose in the following a general and systematic
trajectory initialization scheme based on the simple circular UAV trajectory, which also includes
the one proposed in [21] with θk = 0, ∀ k, as a special case. For a circular UAV trajectory, we
need to obtain the circle center cini = [xini , yini]T and radius rini . For convenience, the circle
center is set as the geometry center of all users, which is given by cini =
PK
k=1
K
wk
. The main idea
for determining the circle radius of the initial circular trajectory is based on the following three
observations. First, it is intuitive that as θk increases, the area covered by the UAV trajectory
shall decrease, as implied in Theorem 1. As such, the initial circle radius rini should decrease
with θk , ∀ k. Second, when θk = 0, ∀ k, the initial circle radius should be simplified to that for
the case when the MRR constraints are not considered as in [21]. Third, it is also known that
when θk = 1, ∀ k, the UAV mobility does not provide any performance gain, which implies that
the UAV should remain static. In such a case, the UAV trajectory becomes a point and the initial
circle radius is thus zero. Based on the above observations, we propose to set the initial circle
radius as
rini =
1−
PK
k=1 θk
K
!
r0 ,
(34)
where r0 is the circle radius for the case when θk = 0, ∀ k, or no MRR constraints are considered
[21]. According to [21], r0 is obtained as follows: 1) by using the user geometry center cini as the
22
circle center, we first calculate the radius of a minimum circle that can cover all ground users,
denoted by rmin = max ||wk −cini ||; 2) to balance the number of users outside and inside the UAV
k∈K
T rmin
, 2 }.
trajectory circle as well as satisfying the UAV speed constraint, we set r0 = min{ Vmax
2π
From (34), it is easy to check that when θk = 0, ∀ k, rini = r0 and when θk = 1, ∀ k, rini = 0,
, ∀ n. With cini and rini , the initial circular UAV trajectory Q0 is
as expected. Let ϕn = 2π Nn−1
−1
given as follows,
q0 [n] = [xini + rini cos ϕn , yini + rini sin ϕn ]T , n = 1, ..., N.
(35)
Next, we initialize the users’ MRRs, θini,k , ∀ k. Note that if user k has no MRR constraint,
i.e., θk = 0, then there exists no constraint for user k in (33). Thus, user k will not cause the
ineffective UAV trajectory update problem previously described in Section III-C and its initial
MRR can be directly set as θini,k = 0. In contrast, as long as user k has a non-trivial MRR
target, i.e., θk > 0, N corresponding MRR constraints in (33) will be imposed for user k which
may cause ineffective updates of the UAV trajectory. Thus, the initial MRRs of users are set as
1,
if θk > 0,
(36)
θini,k =
0,
if θk = 0.
IV. N UMERICAL R ESULTS
In this section, numerical results are provided to validate the proposed joint OFDMA resource
allocation and UAV trajectory design as well as the fundamental throughput-delay tradeoff in
UAV-enabled wireless communications. We consider a system with K = 4 ground users that are
located in a horizontal plane as shown in Fig. 2, marked by ‘×’s. The UAV is assumed to fly
at a fixed altitude H = 500 m [31]. The total available communication bandwidth is B = 10
MHz and the noise power spectrum density at the ground users is assumed to be identical and
set as N0 = −169 dBm/Hz. The channel power gain at the reference distance d0 = 1 m is
set as ρ0 = −50 dB. Other parameters are set as Pmax = 0.1 W, Vmax = 50 m/s, T = 270 s,
and N = 540, respectively, if not specified otherwise. For illustration, all the trajectories in the
simulations are sampled every 4 s and the sampled points are marked by ‘△’s.
A. UAV Trajectory and Max-min Throughput versus Homogeneous MRRs
We first consider the homogeneous delay requirement case when all ground users have the
same MRR, i.e., θk = θ, ∀ k. In Figs. 2 and 3, the UAV trajectory and the max-min throughput are
1500
1500
1000
1000
500
500
y(m)
y(m)
23
0
0
−500
−500
−1000
−1000
−1500
−1500
−1000
−500
0
500
1000
−1500
−1500
1500
−1000
−500
x(m)
1500
1500
1000
1000
500
500
0
−500
−1000
−1000
−500
0
1000
1500
500
1000
1500
0
−500
−1000
500
(b) θ = 0.6
y(m)
y(m)
(a) θ = 0
−1500
−1500
0
x(m)
500
1000
1500
−1500
−1500
−1000
x(m)
(c) θ = 0.8
−500
0
x(m)
(d) θ = 1
Fig. 2. UAV trajectory versus homogeneous MRR θ = θk , ∀ k, for T = 270 s.
illustrated respectively under different MRRs. It can be observed from Fig. 2 that as the MRR,
θ, increases, the UAV’s flight distance decreases and the UAV’s trajectory shrinks gradually
from a square to a smaller ellipse and finally a fixed point, given the same flight period T . In
particular, when θ = 0, i.e., no MRR constraint is considered as in [21], the UAV sequentially
visits and stays above each of the ground users by maximally exploiting its mobility. As such,
the best air-to-ground channel can be realized between the UAV and each ground user. However,
when θ > 0, the UAV’s trajectory adaptively changes depending on the value of θ, as expected.
Notice that in this setup, the closer the UAV flies to one particular user, the farther it is away
from some other users inevitably. As a result, meeting the MRR constraints of these users will
consume more resources (power, bandwidth) and thus becomes the bottleneck for improving the
max-min throughput of the system. Such a situation becomes worse when the MRR and/or the
inter-user distance becomes larger. Generally speaking, with more stringent MRR constraints,
the UAV trajectory tends to be more restricted to avoid getting too far away from any of the
users. Finally, as all ground users have the same MRR constraint as well as the same average
24
1
Static UAV
Initial trajectory
Fly−and−hover trajectory
Proposed trajectory
Max−min throughput (bps/Hz)
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
MRR, θ
Fig. 3. Max-min throughput versus homogeneous MRR θ = θk , ∀ k, for T = 270 s.
throughput, the UAV trajectories are shown to be all symmetric over the users in Fig. 2.
The effect of the MRR constraint on the max-min average throughput is shown in Fig. 3.
Specifically, we compare the following four trajectories: 1) Proposed trajectory which is obtained
by applying Algorithm 2; 2) Fly-and-hover trajectory where the UAV flies with the maximum
speed to visit all the users and hovers (with zero speed) above each of them by equally allocating
the remaining time2; 3) Initial circular trajectory as described in Section III-D; and 4) Static UAV
where the UAV remains static above the geometry center of the users. For all the four schemes
considered, the bandwidth and power allocation is optimized by applying Algorithm 1 with the
corresponding UAV trajectory. First, we observe that the max-min average throughput gradually
decreases with the MRR for the first three considered trajectories with a mobile UAV in general.
This is due to the fundamental tradeoff between the system throughput and the user delay/MRR
constraint, which is in accordance with Theorem 1. Second, when the MRR is small, the proposed
trajectory significantly outperforms the circular trajectory and static UAV. This is because a small
MRR in general implies a large degree of freedom for the UAV trajectory design, but the static
UAV cannot exploit the UAV mobility while the circular trajectory does not fully exploit the
UAV mobility. In contrast, the fly-and-hover trajectory is observed to achieve the throughput very
2
It is worth pointing out that this trajectory is only feasible when T is sufficient large such that the UAV can visit above each
of all ground users.
25
1.3
Max−min throughput (bps/Hz)
1.2
θ=0
θ=0.3
θ=0.6
θ=1
1.1
1
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Period T (s)
Fig. 4. Max-min throughput versus UAV flight period T .
close to the proposed trajectory for small MRR values. However, when the MRR becomes large,
the fly-and-hover trajectory suffers from a significant throughput loss compared to the proposed
trajectory. This is expected since the fly-and-hover trajectory results in highly asymmetric user
channels over time and thus is inefficient for meeting increasingly more stringent users’ MRR
requirements. Finally, when the MRR reaches the maximum value of one, the max-min average
throughput of the proposed trajectory becomes identical to that of static UAV as the trajectory
converges to the same point as the static UAV.
In Fig. 4, the effect of the UAV flight period T on the max-min average throughput is shown
under different values of the homogeneous MRR, θ. It is observed that the max-min throughput
in the three cases with θ < 1 all increases with T , while for the case of θ = 1, the max-min
throughput remains constant, regardless of T . This suggests that as long as the users have delaytolerant data traffic, i.e, θ < 1, the UAV mobility indeed provides throughput gains over a static
UAV with θ = 1 for any T > 0. In addition, such a throughput gain generally increases with
more flight time for the UAV, although the gain is more pronounced when θ is smaller or less
strict delay/MRR constraints are applied. This is because in such cases, as T increases, the UAV
has more time to get closer to each of the users and even be able to hover above them to enjoy
the best channels to them. In contrast, if the services required by users are all delay-constrained,
i.e., θ = 1, then the UAV is unable to achieve any throughput gain over the static case since
26
1500
1500
1000
1000
user 3
user 1
500
y(m)
y(m)
500
0
−500
−1000
−1500
−1500
0
−500
user 2
user 4
−1000
−1000
−500
0
500
1000
−1500
−1500
1500
−1000
−500
1500
1500
1000
1000
500
500
0
−500
−1000
−1000
−500
0
1000
1500
1000
1500
0
−500
−1000
500
(b) θ3 = θ4 = 0.4
y(m)
y(m)
(a) θ3 = θ4 = 0
−1500
−1500
0
x(m)
x(m)
500
1000
1500
−1500
−1500
x(m)
(c) θ3 = θ4 = 0.6
−1000
−500
0
500
x(m)
(d) θ3 = θ4 = 0.8
Fig. 5. UAV trajectory versus MRRs of equal θ3 and θ4 for T = 270 s with fixed θ1 = θ2 = 0.4.
the optimal UAV trajectory in this case is also a fixed point. The above observations further
demonstrate the fundamental throughput-delay tradeoff.
B. UAV Trajectory and Max-min Throughput versus Heterogeneous MRRs
Next, we consider the practical case when ground users have different MRRs in general.
In this example, we fix θ1 = θ2 = 0.4 and vary θ3 and θ4 by assuming they are equal to
show their effects on the proposed UAV trajectory and achievable max-min throughput. First,
from Fig. 5, we observe that as the MRRs of users 3 and 4 become larger, the UAV tends to
adjust its trajectory to get closer to these two users so as to meet their increasingly more stringent
minimum-rate requirements. Meanwhile, since the MRRs of users 1 and 2 are fixed, their priority
is higher/lower than that of users 3 and 4 in Fig. 5 (a) and Fig. 5 (c)/(d), respectively, in the
optimized UAV trajectory design. This thus results in asymmetric UAV trajectories for the four
users in these cases, which is in contrast to the symmetric trajectory in Fig. 5 (b) with the
homogeneous users’ MRR constraint. As such, users 1 and 2 in Fig. 5 (c) and (d) on average
27
0.7
Static UAV
Initial trajectory
Fly−and−hover trajectory
Proposed trajectory
Max−min throughput (bps/Hz)
0.65
0.6
0.55
0.5
0.45
0.4
0.35
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
MRR, θ
Fig. 6. Max-min throughput versus heterogeneous MRRs θ = θ3 = θ4 for T = 270 s with fixed θ1 = θ2 = 0.4.
have worse air-to-ground channels than users 3 and 4 along the UAV trajectory. Since the same
average throughput needs to be achieved for all users, the UAV needs to lower its speed and
even hover at some positions near users 1 and 2 to compensate their inferior channels caused by
the asymmetric UAV trajectory. Similar to Fig. 3, we compare in Fig. 6 the max-min throughput
versus the MRRs of users 3 and 4 under the aforementioned four UAV trajectories. As θ3 and
θ4 increase, the max-min average throughput is observed to decrease gradually, similarly as in
Fig. 3. However, different from Fig. 3, since only two users, namely, users 3 and 4, rather than
all users, increase their MRRs, the decreasing of the max-min throughput versus θ in Fig. 6 is
less significant as compared to that in Fig. 3.
V. C ONCLUSIONS
Motivated by employing UAVs to provide both delay-constrained and delay-tolerant services in
future wireless networks, we consider in this paper a UAV-enabled OFDMA network for serving
multiple ground users with heterogeneous communication delay requirements. Specifically, by
taking into account the users’ MRR constraints, the system max-min average throughput is
maximized via jointly optimizing the UAV trajectory and OFDMA resource allocation. We first
show that the max-min throughput in general decreases with the MRR of any user, which implies
that the throughput gain arising from the UAV’s mobility is less significant as the user delay
requirements become more stringent. Then, we show that directly applying the conventional block
28
coordinate descent method to solve the formulated problem may fail to update the UAV trajectory
effectively. To overcome this issue, we propose a new parameter-assisted block coordinate
descent algorithm which is shown by simulations to perform satisfactorily. Simulation results are
provided to characterize the fundamental tradeoff between the system throughput and the user
communication delay under different MRR setups. We hope that the results of the paper can help
assessing more practically the performance of UAV-enabled wireless systems with heterogeneous
delay requirements. Although a single UAV is considered in this work, the multi-UAV scenario
with potentially co-channel interference [18] is worth pursuing. In addition, a cross-layer design
by considering the UAV’s finite data buffer and the queuing delay along with UAV trajectory
and physical-layer resource allocation is worthy of further investigation. Finally, as the UAV’s
energy consumption and hence endurance are crucial in practice, it is appealing to consider
energy-efficient UAV trajectory design [16], [37] under heterogenous user delay requirements.
R EFERENCES
[1] Q. Wu and R. Zhang, “Delay-constrained throughput maximization in UAV-enabled OFDM systems,” in Proc. IEEE APCC,
Dec. 2017, to appear.
[2] “Small unmanned aerial vehicles for aerial imaging, recreation, and aerial games: Global market analysis and forecasts.”
[Online] Available: https://www.tractica.com/research/consumer-drones/.
[3] “Intel is bringing its drone light shows to the olympics.” [Online] Available: https://unmanned-aerial.com/intel-bringingdrone-light-shows-olympics.
[4] “Safe DRONE act of 2017.” [Online] Available: https://www.warner.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/pressreleases?ID=
DFF94CA4-3691-4753-AEF2-EB3E97148754.
[5] “Cellular drone communication: LTE drone trial report.” [Online] Available: https://www.qualcomm.com/documents/
lte-unmanned-aircraft-systems-trial-report.
[6] Y. Zeng, R. Zhang, and T. J. Lim, “Wireless communications with unmanned aerial vehicles: Opportunities and challenges,”
IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 36–42, May 2016.
[7] A. Al-Hourani, S. Kandeepan, and S. Lardner, “Optimal LAP altitude for maximum coverage,” IEEE Wireless Commun.
Lett., vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 569–572, Dec. 2014.
[8] J. Lyu, Y. Zeng, R. Zhang, and T. J. Lim, “Placement optimization of UAV-mounted mobile base stations,” IEEE Commun.
Lett., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 604–607, Mar. 2017.
[9] R. I. Bor-Yaliniz, A. El-Keyi, and H. Yanikomeroglu, “Efficient 3-D placement of an aerial base station in next generation
cellular networks,” in Proc. IEEE ICC, May 2016.
[10] V. V. Chetlur and H. S. Dhillon, “Downlink coverage analysis for a finite 3D wireless network of unmanned aerial vehicles,”
[Online] Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1701.01212.
[11] A. Fotouhi, M. Ding, and M. Hassan, “Dynamic base station repositioning to improve performance of drone small cells,”
in Proc. IEEE GLOBECOM, Dec. 2016.
[12] C. Zhang and W. Zhang, “Spectrum sharing for drone networks,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 136–144,
Jan. 2017.
29
[13] K. Li, W. Ni, X. Wang, R. P. Liu, S. S. Kanhere, and S. Jha, “Energy-efficient cooperative relaying for unmanned aerial
vehicles,” IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput., vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1377–1386, Jun. 2016.
[14] M. Mozaffari, W. Saad, M. Bennis, and M. Debbah, “Unmanned aerial vehicle with underlaid device-to-device communications: Performance and tradeoffs,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 3949–3963, Jun. 2016.
[15] Y. Zeng, R. Zhang, and T. J. Lim, “Throughput maximization for UAV-enabled mobile relaying systems,” IEEE Trans.
Commun., vol. 64, no. 12, pp. 4983–4996, Dec. 2016.
[16] Y. Zeng and R. Zhang, “Energy-efficient UAV communication with trajectory optimization,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun.,
vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 3747–3760, Jun. 2017.
[17] J. Lyu, Y. Zeng, and R. Zhang, “Cyclical multiple access in UAV-aided communications: A throughput-delay tradeoff,”
IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 600–603, Dec. 2016.
[18] Q. Wu, Y. Zeng, and R. Zhang, “Joint trajectory and communication design for multi-UAV enabled wireless networks,”
IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., to appear, [Online] Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.02723.
[19] Q. Wu, G. Y. Li, W. Chen, D. W. K. Ng, and R. Schober, “An overview of sustainable green 5G networks,” IEEE Wireless
Commun. Mag., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 72–80, Aug. 2017.
[20] S. Zhang, Q. Wu, S. Xu, and G. Li, “Fundamental green tradeoffs: Progresses, challenges, and impacts on 5G networks,”
IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 33–56, First Quarter 2017.
[21] Q. Wu, Y. Zeng, and R. Zhang, “Joint trajectory and communication design for UAV-enabled multiple access,” in Proc.
IEEE Globecom, 2017, to appear, [Online] Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.01765.
[22] Q. Wu, J. Xu, and R. Zhang, “Capacity characterization of UAV-enabled two-user broadcast channel,” submitted to IEEE
J. Sel. Areas Commun., 2017, [Online] Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.00443.
[23] G. Zhang, Q. Wu, M. Cui, and R. Zhang, “Securing UAV communications via trajectory optimization,” in Proc. IEEE
GLOBECOM, Dec. 2017, to appear.
[24] J. G. Andrews, S. Buzzi, W. Choi, S. V. Hanly, A. Lozano, A. C. Soong, and J. C. Zhang, “What will 5G be?” IEEE J.
Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 1065–1082, Jun. 2014.
[25] Q. Wu, W. Chen, M. Tao, J. Li, H. Tang, and J. Wu, “Resource allocation for joint transmitter and receiver energy efficiency
maximization in downlink OFDMA systems,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 416–430, Feb. 2015.
[26] F. Wang, W. Chen, H. Tang, and Q. Wu, “Joint optimization of user association, subchannel allocation, and power allocation
in multi-cell multi-association OFDMA heterogeneous networks,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 65, no. 6, Jun. 2017.
[27] S. Jeong, O. Simeone, and J. Kang, “Mobile edge computing via a UAV-mounted cloudlet: Optimal bit allocation and
path planning,” [Online] Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.05362.
[28] M. Mozaffari, W. Saad, M. Bennis, and M. Debbah, “Mobile internet of things: Can UAVs provide an energy-efficient
mobile architecture?” in Proc. IEEE GLOBECOM, Dec. 2016.
[29] X. Lin et al., “The sky is not the limit: LTE for unmanned aerial vehicles,” [Online] Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.
07534.
[30] B. Van Der Bergh, A. Chiumento, and S. Pollin, “LTE in the sky: trading off propagation benefits with interference costs
for aerial nodes,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 44–50, May 2016.
[31] D. W. Matolak and R. Sun, “Air-ground channel characterization for unmanned aircraft systemsłpart III: The suburban and
near-urban environments,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 66, no. 8, pp. 6607–6618, Jan. 2017.
[32] S. Boyd and L. Vandenberghe, Convex Optimization.
Cambridge University Press, 2004.
[33] S. Boyd, “Ellipsoid method,” stanford University, California, USA. [Online] Available: https://stanford.edu/class/ee364b/
lectures/ellipsoid method notes.pdf.
30
[34] M. Grant and S. Boyd, “CVX: MATLAB software for disciplined convex programming,” 2016. [Online] Available: http:
//cvxr.com/cvx.
[35] D. P. Bertsekas, Nonlinear Programming.
Athena Scientific, 1999.
[36] M. Hong, M. Razaviyayn, Z.-Q. Luo, and J.-S. Pang, “A unified algorithmic framework for block-structured optimization
involving big data: With applications in machine learning and signal processing,” IEEE Signal Process. Mag., vol. 33,
no. 1, pp. 57–77, Jan. 2016.
[37] D. Yang, Q. Wu, Y. Zeng, and R. Zhang, “Energy trade-off in ground-to-UAV communication via trajectory design,”
submitted to IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol, 2017, [Online] Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.02975.
| 7cs.IT
|
Using MOEAs to Outperform Stock Benchmarks in the Presence of Typical
Investment Constraints
Andrew Clark1 and Jeff Kenyon2, Thomson Reuters
Abstract
Portfolio managers are typically constrained by turnover limits, minimum and maximum stock
positions, cardinality, a target market capitalization and sometimes the need to hew to a style
(such as growth or value). In addition, portfolio managers often use multifactor stock models to
choose stocks based upon their respective fundamental data.
We use multiobjective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) to satisfy the above real-world
constraints. The portfolios generated consistently outperform typical performance benchmarks
and have statistically significant asset selection.
In finance, a portfolio is a collection of assets held by an institution or a private individual. The
portfolio selection problem seeks the optimal way to distribute a given monetary budget on a set
of available assets. The problem usually has two criteria: expected return to be maximized and
risk to be minimized. Classical mean-variance portfolio selection aims at simultaneously
maximizing the expected return of the portfolio and minimizing portfolio risk. In the case of
linear equality and inequality constraints, the problem can be solved efficiently by quadratic
programming, i.e., variants of Markowitz‟s critical line algorithm. What complicates this simple
1
2
Andrew Clark, Chief Index Strategist, Thomson Reuters Indices & Lipper, [email protected]
Jeff Kenyon, Lead Software Engineer, Thomson Reuters Indices, [email protected]
1
statement of portfolio construction are the typical real-world constraints that are by definition
non-convex, e.g. cardinality constraints which limits the number of assets in a portfolio and
minimum and maximum buy-in thresholds. In what follows, we use multi-objective
evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs)3 as an active set algorithm optimized for portfolio selection.
The MOEAs generate the set of all feasible portfolios (those portfolios meeting the constraints),
calculates the efficient frontier for each and also their respective Sharpe ratio. The portfolio
with the best Sharpe ratio becomes the portfolio used for the next time period. We chose
MOEAs to solve a non convex optimization problem because there are certain outstanding
problems in terms of their use: 1) In the literature MOEAs have not been used to solve multiperiod financial problems (or multi-period problems in general), 2) The number and types of
constraints in a real world financial portfolio problem exceeds what has been done with MOEAs
so far and 3) It is not known if MOEA stock selection is statistically significant. We answer all
of these questions with a yes thereby advancing the understanding and use of MOEAs. This
especially true when it comes to solving a moderately difficult, multi-period real world problem
such as those encountered in finance.
A multi-objective optimization problem (MOP) differs from a single objective optimization
problem because it contains several objectives that require optimization. When optimizing a
single objective problem, the best single design solution is the goal. But for multiobjective
problem with several (possibly conflicting) objectives, there is usually no single optimal
solution. Because of this the decision maker is required to select a solution from a finite set of
possible solutions by making compromises. A suitable solution should provide acceptable
3
See Coello et al Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems, Kluwer, 2002, for a good
introduction to MOEAs.
2
performance over all objectives. The main motivation for using evolutionary algorithms (EAs) to
solve multi-objective optimization problems is that EAs can deal simultaneously with a set of
possible solutions which allows us to find several members of what is called the Pareto optimal
set4 in a single run of the algorithm. This differs from deterministic mathematical programming
techniques where a series of separate runs is required. Additionally EAs are less susceptible to
the shape or continuity of the Pareto front, e.g., they can easily deal with discontinuous and
concave Pareto fronts. Discontinuity and concavity problems are known obstacles for
deterministic mathematical programming.
Adapting any stochastic optimization algorithm (such as an EA) so it can perform a
multiobjective optimization requires a change to the method of archiving possible solutions. Any
solution on the Pareto front can be identified formally by the fact that it is not dominated by any
other possible solution. A solution X is said to be dominated by solution Y if Y is at least as good
on all counts (constraints) and better on at least one constraint. Stated mathematically:
fi (Y )
fi ( X ) i 1, M and fi (Y )
f i ( X ) for some i
As several possible solutions can be generated, an archive of the non-dominated (Pareto optimal)
solutions needs to be maintained. A possible archiving scheme is:
All feasible solutions (Pareto optimal vectors) generated are candidates for archiving
4
A solution or a set is considered Pareto optimal if there exists no feasible solution which would decrease some
constraint without causing a simultaneous increase in at least one other constraint.
3
If a candidate solution dominates any existing members of the archive, the dominated
solutions are removed
If the new solution is dominated by any existing member of the archive, the new solution
is not archived
If the new solution neither dominates nor is dominated by any members of the archive,
the new solution is added to the archive
Using such a scheme, as the search progresses, the archive will converge to the true trade-off
surface between constraints.
As to the EA part of MOEA, a generic EA assumes a discrete search space H and a function
f :H
where H is a subset of the Euclidean space
(in a multiobjective problem H is a subset of the
Euclidean space
M
where M is the number of constraints).
The general problem is to find
arg min f
X H
where X is a vector of the decision variables and f is the objective function.
With EAs it is customary to distinguish genotype – the encoded representation of the variables
from phenotype – the set of variables themselves. The vector X is represented by a string (or
chromosome) s of length l made up of symbols drawn from an alphabet A using the mapping
c : Al
4
H
If the domain of c is total, i.e. the domain of c is all of Al, c is called a decoding function. The
mapping c is not necessarily surjective. The range of c determines the subset of Al available for
exploration by an evolutionary algorithm.
The range of c, Ξ
Al
is needed in order to account for the fact that some strings in the image Al under c may represent
invalid solutions to the original problem.
The search space Ξ can be determined by either Shannon or 2nd order Renyi entropy. If the
decision variables X are independent, Shannon entropy applies. If the decision variables are
correlated then 2nd order Renyi entropy applies. A minimization of either entropy will help
define the feasible search space Ξ.
The string length l depends on the dimensions of both H and A with the elements of the string
corresponding to genes and values to alleles. This statement of genes and alleles is often
referred to as genotype-phenotype mapping.
Given the statements above, the optimization becomes:
arg min g
S L
given the function
g ( s)
f (c(s))
5
Finally, in EAs it is helpful if c is a bijection. The important property of a bijection as it applies
to EAs is that bijections have an inverse, i.e. there is unique vector x for every string and a
unique string for each x.
EAs involve techniques that implement mechanisms inspired by evolution such as reproduction,
mutation, recombination, selection and survival of the fittest. Candidate solutions to the
optimization problem play the role of individuals in a population and the objective function
determines the environment within which the solutions "live.” Evolution of the population then
takes place after the repeated application of the above operators5.
In this process, there are two main forces that form the basis of EAs: recombination and mutation
which create the necessary diversity and thereby facilitate novelty. Selection acts as a force
increasing quality.
Many aspects of EAs are stochastic. Changed pieces of information due to recombination and
mutation are randomly chosen. On the other hand, selection operators can be either deterministic,
or stochastic. In the latter case, individuals with a higher fitness have a higher chance to be
selected than individuals with a lower fitness but typically even weak individuals have a chance
to become a parent or to survive.
Choosing the numerical values or techniques that will compute/simulate mutation, recombination
and so forth tends to be heuristic. In the MOEA descriptions below, we use standard procedures
and values to set the evolutionary parameters. For those interested in reading more about the
various values and techniques that are used to select evolutionary parameters, the authors suggest
5
The mathematical development of EA operators and functions is contained in the end note of this paper.
6
K. Deb, Multi-Objective Optimization using Evolutionary Algorithms, John Wiley and Sons,
2000.
The two optimization problems we face are: generate a series of monthly portfolios that
outperform the S&P 500 over the last 30 years and generate a set of monthly portfolios that
outperform the Russell 1000 Growth index over the last 15 years.
The constraints we will operate under to attain our goals are: turnover is not to exceed 8% per
month, the minimum stock position is set at 0.35% of the net asset value of the portfolio, the
maximum stock position is set at 4% of the net asset value of the portfolio6 and a target market
capitalization constraint where the average market capitalization of the portfolio must be greater
than the average market capitalization of all stocks available to purchase in the current month
(this last constraint will mean both portfolio sets will be what is called “large-cap” The S&P 500
and the Russell 1000 Growth are large-cap benchmarks). Another constraint common to both
problems is we must choose stocks that maximize the scores generated by a multi-factor stock
model7. This constraint typifies the use of what is called fundamental financial data to select
stocks that are potential candidates for the final monthly portfolios.
An additional constraint was added just for the Russell 1000 Growth problem: we cannot exceed
the average book-to-price value of all stocks available for purchase in the current month.
6
The minimum and maximum position constraints also imply a cardinality constraint. Dividing 100% by 0.35%
yields 286 which is the maximum number of stocks any portfolio can have. Dividing 100% by 4% gives 25 which
the minimum number of stocks any portfolio can have. The cardinality constraint is solved in the first MOEA while
the position constraints are solved in the second MOEA.
7
The details and back testing of the multi-factor stock model can be found in Chapter 3 of Handbook of Portfolio
Construction, edited by John Guerard. We thank John for supplying the multi-factor scores and all the other data
used in these models.
7
Meeting this constraint will mean we will generate the required growth portfolios for the Russell
1000 Growth pool.
We solve the issues of the constraints by breaking them into two sets and use two MOEAs. The
first MOEA generates potential portfolios that lie within the bounds of all the constraints except
turnover and position. In the second MOEA, we trade off the turnover and position constraints
as well as mean return and variance (the last being the typical factors used in mean-variance
optimization). We set the rebalance period to quarterly versus monthly but stay within the stated
turnover constraint (not to exceed 8% per month). The steps each MOEA takes are as follows.
Data Loading, Retrieving and Filtering
1. Load the target candidate constituent sets from the multi-factor score files. “Sets” and
“Files” because we need to build two sets of candidate portfolios each month, one for the
large-cap portfolio and another for the large-cap growth portfolio (please note that the
size of these files goes from approximately 1000 stocks in 1980 to more than 3000 in
2009).
2. Remove candidates that may be excluded, on an a priori basis, of being unable to
contribute toward the portfolio goals.
a. Remove candidates with scores of less than 20 (this was a heuristic choice)
b. Rank candidates by market cap and eliminate the bottom 12% of candidates. If the
market cap at this level is greater than US$750M, use US$750M as the floor for
the cutoff (this cutoff is based upon common definitions of where small-cap
stocks start to appear the U.S. stock market).
8
3. From this subset of candidate equities, retrieve daily price data going back 287
observations (for use in trading off mean and variance in second MOEA), and going
forward 63 observations (for use in performance calculation of final [best] portfolio over
the next three months).
4. Calculate the average market cap and average book to price score of the constituents in
the target benchmark index (average book-to-price is used to determine if a portfolio
satisfies the style constraint).
5. The candidate constituents remaining serve as the primary input to the MOEA phase.
MOEA Phase I
In this phase the goal is to identify a set of portfolios (ideally 50 or less) that will each be
examined by the second MOEA. Output of the MOEA for each portfolio is the identification of a
subset of the candidates (between 25 and 286) to be used as candidates for later optimization
(again 25 because of the 4% maximum constraint and 286 because of 0.35% constraint).
1. The MOEA is invoked, passing the candidate constituent data, portfolio constituents from
previous rebalances, the market cap average for the target benchmark index and
population, generations, and mutation rate. For the large-cap growth portfolio, there is an
additional parameter for the average book-price score of the target benchmark portfolio.
a. MOEA algorithm is NSGA II, using single point crossover, bit flip mutation, and
binary tournament for selection. For the passed parameters, population represents
the number of proposed solutions that will be carried from generation to
generation (note that the number of non-dominated solutions is often considerably
smaller); generations is the number of generations to be evaluated within the
9
evolutionary algorithm; and mutation rate indicates the rate at which a dominated
portfolio will be modified as it moves from generation to generation.
b. For the large-cap portfolio, population is 500, generations are 1200, and mutation
rate is 0.03 (3%).
c. For large-cap growth portfolio, population is 50 (for the three-objective problem,
a population of 500 tended to generate several hundred non-dominated solutions;
the population number is dropped to avoid generating more solutions than can be
explored in the MVO phase). All other parameters are the same.
2. Generation-zero portfolios are started with 156 equities randomly selected. If there are
portfolios from a previous rebalance available, those portfolios are seeded into the
population.
3. The large-cap portfolio objectives are the maximization of multi-factor score and average
market cap. The large-cap growth portfolio adds a third objective to minimize the bookto-price score.
4. Penalties are in place to enforce the cardinality and market cap constraints. For large-cap
growth, there is also a penalty for exceeding the book-price average passed in.
5. The MOEA phase produces two files as output. One file contains the objective values for
the solution set, and the other contains the portfolios (where each equity has a 0/1 value)
describing the Pareto efficient frontier.
6. Any portfolios passing constraints from the previous rebalance are added to the set of
portfolios generated by the MOEA
10
MOEA Phase II
In preparation for running the second MOEA, daily returns are calculated for all equities that
may appear in a portfolio (to avoid having to recalculate a daily return series for an equity
multiple times), and the daily risk free rate closest to the rebalance date is retrieved (for use in
calculating the Sharpe ratio). Then for each portfolio from the previous MOEA, the following
actions are taken:
1. Identify the equities designated as candidates for the portfolio being processed, and form
the returns matrix. The minimum number of returns to be used is 126 (six months);
because the number of observations must exceed the number of candidate equities (the
so-called “curse of dimensionality”), the maximum number of returns in the series is
determined by portfolio size, up to 287.
2. In addition to forming the returns matrix (step 1 above), we also need to generate mean
expected returns, variances, and the covariance matrix.
3. The MOEA is called, using pointers to the above files, a pointer to the file containing the
previous winning portfolio, and the MOEA parameters (population = 100, generations =
600, mutation rate = 0.01).
4. Following the lead of an earlier replication of MVO results using MOEA, the algorithm
used is SPEA2. SBXCrossover, polynomial mutation, and selection by binary
tournament. The SPEA2 archive size is the same as the prior population size.
5. Random portfolios are used for generation zero. If available, the previous winning
portfolio is seeded into the generation zero set.
6. In each evaluation, the randomly assigned weights are normalized (so that they sum to 1).
11
7. In weighting strategy #1 (non-zero values are 0.0035 <= w <= 0.04), weights greater than
0.00175 are rounded up to 0.0035, while weights under that amount are rounded to zero.
Weights over 0.04 are set to 0.04. All weight adjustments are added to a ledger, and then
debited or credited at the end of the adjustment process (evenly divided among those that
can accept the debit/credit amount without moving outside the set weight boundary).
8. In weighting strategy #2 (all equities are weighted, 0.0035 <= w <= 0.04), values less
than 0.0035 are rounded up to 0.0035, while values over 0.04 are set to 0.04. All weight
adjustments are added to a ledger, and then debited or credited at the end of the
adjustment process (evenly divided among those that can accept the debit/credit amount
without moving outside the set weight boundary).
9. There are four objectives for the MOEA: maximize return, minimize risk, minimize
turnover and meet the maximum and minimum holdings constraint. The first two
objectives are the standard MVO calculations8. The turnover and position objectives
calculate the shift in weight between the previous winning portfolio and the proposed
portfolio. It attempts to insure that no portfolios break the holdings or turnover bounds.
10. Once all MVOs have been run, the winning portfolio is then selected. Ideally, this is the
portfolio with the best Sharpe ratio that has also passed the market cap and turnover
constraints. If no portfolios pass the constraints, the portfolio with the best turnover is
considered the winner.
11. The performance for the winning portfolio (and the target benchmark index) for the
period until the next rebalance is then calculated and logged.
8
See Investments, Z. Bodie, A. Kane, A. J. Marcus Richard D. Irwin, Inc., Homewood, IL. 1989,
pg. 203, formulas 7.10 and 7.11.
12
MOEA IIa
If the turnover constraint is not met in Step 9, we use a third MOEA that trades off the best
Sharpe ratio portfolio with its existing stock positions against turnover.
The form this MOEA takes is somewhat similar to solving the minimum cut problem in graph
theory using MOEAs9. The difference between our MOEA and the MOEAs that have been used
to solve the minimum cut problem is that we are interested in reducing or enlarging the weight of
one or more edges while keeping within the position limit constraints (though we do allow the
stock holding to go to zero if needed). Once stocks are re-weighted and the turnover constraint
reached, a new efficient frontier is calculated and the new Sharpe portfolio examined. If the new
Sharpe portfolio meets the turnover and position constraints, the MOEA in IIa stops and the best
Sharpe portfolio for this feasible portfolio from MOEA I is stored. The process is repeated for
all the portfolios passed from MOEA I that do not meet the turnover constraints after their first
Sharpe portfolio is formed.
Once turnover constraints are met for the Sharpe portfolios that fail step 9 but pass what maybe
called Step 9a, Steps 10 and 11 are now executed
In Exhibit 1 are the 1, 3, 5 and 10 year annualized (transaction cost adjusted) returns for the
large-cap MOEA portfolios and the S&P 500. The period covered is from December 1979
through December 2009 (121 months)
9
See for example “Computing Minimum Cuts by Randomized Search Heuristics,” F. Neumann, et al,
http://arnetminer.org/viewpub.do?pid=228033
13
Exhibit 1
1 Year 3 Year 5 Year 10 Year
S&P 500
9%
30%
54%
137%
MOEA
13%
44%
84%
239%
Exhibit 2 has the annualized risk and cumulative return on 10,000 USD for the S&P 500 and the
MOEA portfolios for the same time period
Exhibit 2
Cumulative
Sharpe Ratio Information Ratio Return on 10,000 USD
S&P 500
1.1
N/A
37,070
MOEA
1.8
0.14
49,500
In Exhibit 3 are the 1, 3, 5 and 10 year annualized (transaction cost adjusted) returns for the
large-cap growth MOEA portfolios and the Russell Growth 1000. The period covered is from
December 1996 through December 2009 (53 months)
Exhibit 3
1 Year 3 Year 5 Year 10 Year
R1000 Growth
10%
33%
61%
159%
MOEA
14%
48%
93%
271%
14
Exhibit 4 has the annualized risk and cumulative return on 10,000 USD for the Russell Growth
1000 and the MOEA portfolios for the same time period
Exhibit 4
Cumulative
Sharpe Ratio Information Ratio Return on 10,000 USD
R1000 Growth
0.14
N/A
25,688
MOEA
0.24
0.32
31,298
As seen in Exhibits 1 – 4 the percent return and USD return of the MOEA portfolios is
approximately double the value of their benchmarks.
On a risk-adjusted basis, the results are somewhat mixed. The information ratio for the large-cap
growth MOEA is very significant while its Sharpe ratio is only a little larger than the Russell
1000 Growth Sharpe ratio and both are little different from 0 (zero). For the large-cap MOEA,
its Sharpe ratio is significantly larger than its benchmark, but its information ratio is very small.
So it is not clear that the MOEA portfolios are the better risk-adjusted portfolios in all cases. By
not underperforming their benchmarks on a risk-adjusted basis, the implication is that at a
minimum the MOEAs reside on a higher curve in risk-return space and could be the more
attractive portfolios to investors.
As to the other constraints: 1) In 100% of all cases, the MOEA portfolios on a weighted market
capitalization basis met or exceeded the market capitalization constraint, 2) For the smallest and
15
largest positions constraints based on net asset value, none of the MOEA portfolios broke this
constraint on either the minimum or maximum side, 3) Turnover did occasionally exceed the 8%
limit per month. These occurrences tended to happen early in the 1980‟s portfolios just as the
MOEA was getting on its feet. And the turnover limit was broken in a small number of later
portfolios as well. The authors conjecture that in the latter cases the non-dominated feasible
solutions handed off to the second MOEA were composed of individual stocks different enough
from the prior quarter‟s portfolio that all the resulting portfolios prevented the turnover
constraint from being met. This is an open question however and needs further investigation.
As to one of the reasons why we chose to use MOEAs - is the stock selection of the quarterly
portfolios statistically significant - we find the answer to be yes. As measured by John Guerard10
the MOEA asset selection was very significant. This is a very pleasant surprise to the authors,
especially as the portfolios typically contained 150 – 200 stocks. Our results demonstrate that
MOEAs can generate statistically significant asset selection while operating under real world
constraints and using fundamentally driven stock scores.
In this paper we demonstrate that MOEAs in the presence of real world constraints can generate
portfolios that have higher returns than their benchmarks, comparable (if not better) risk adjusted
returns versus their benchmarks and statistically significant asset selection.11
10
Private communication
We have been asked the question: what are MOEA run times like versus mixed integer programming. We asked a
colleague of ours – Todd Morrison – to use the same data supplied to us by John Guerard and the same constraints
to solve the same optimization problems but by using mixed integer programming. The total time needed to
generate all the portfolios for each problem was less using MOEAs than mixed integer programming. There is an
important caveat however. The major difference in performance occurs before the number of stocks approaches
3000 or more. At that point MOEAs and mixed integer programming take approximately the same time to form the
final quarterly portfolio. Further, these test results must be taken with a large grain of salt. The tests discussed here
11
16
We arrive at these portfolios by dividing the MOEA in two: the first MOEA generates all the
non-denominated feasible sets that meet all the constraints except turnover and minimum and
maximum position. The second MOEA trades off the last two constraints along with mean and
variance to come up with the final portfolio that has the best Sharpe ratio (or meets the maximum
turnover if the other constraints are not met).
As MOEA I can generate feasible solutions to constrained stock selection problems, it could be
of help to portfolio managers when deciding which stocks stay in, which move out and which
are added to her portfolio. The run time of MOEA I, operating under the constraints above and
in the presence of 3000 or more stocks, is 15 – 30 minutes in order to generate a set of 20 - 30
feasible solutions (the run time is less if a smaller solution set is needed). The advantage the
feasible solution set gives to the portfolio manager is that at a glance she can see the trade-offs
between possible stock portfolios, all of which meet most (if not in some cases all) the
constraints to varying degrees.
Finally, as best as we know, this is the first multi-period use of MOEAs in stock portfolio
construction. We are encouraged by the results and hope others will extend and improve upon
our work.
are only two of many problems that can be solved using either technique. A test bed needs to be developed before a
clear statement of equality or superiority can be made.
17
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank John Guerard of McKinley Capital for the challenge he set us.
We would not have tested MOEAs in the way described above without John’s challenge.
ENDNOTE
The „gory” details of EAs such as the hows and whys of mutation are not described above. What
follows are those details.
First we will define the EA fitness function. As H is nonempty set and c : Al
f :H
, we can define the fitness scaling function Ts :
H and
and a related fitness function
Ts f c .
In this definition it is understood that the objective function f is determined by the application,
while the specification of the decoding function c12 and the fitness scaling function Ts are design
issues13.
Execution of an EA typically begins by randomly sampling with replacement from Al. The
resulting collection is the initial population denoted P. More generally a population is a
collection P = {a1 ,…,aμ } of individuals ai
Al . The number of individuals μ is referred to as
the population size.
12
Remember that if the domain of c is total, i.e. the domain of c is all of A I, c is called a decoding function. The
mapping c is not necessarily surjective. The range of c determines the subset of Al available for exploration by the
evolutionary algorithm.
18
Following initialization, execution proceeds iteratively. Each iteration consists of an application
of one or more evolutionary operators. The combined effect of the evolutionary operators
applied in a particular generation t
N is to transform the current population P(t) into a new
population P(t+1).
In the population transformation,
(the parent and offspring population sizes
,
respectively). A mapping T : H
H
is called a population transformation. If T ( P)
then P is a parent population and P/ is the offspring population. If
P
then they are called
simply the population size.
The population transform (PT) resulting from an evolutionary operatory (EO) often depends on
the outcome of a random experiment. In Merkle and Lamont 14 this result is referred to as a
random population transform (RPT) or random PT
and
To define RPT, let
R:
T (H ,
be a set (the sample space). A random function
H ) is called a random population transformation. The distribution of
PTs resulting from the application of an EO depends on the operator parameters, in other words
an EO maps its parameters to a RPT.
14
L.D. Merkle and G.B. Lamont, “A Random Function Based Framework for Evolutionary Algorithms”, in
Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, Morgan Kauffman, San Mateo, CA.,
1997
19
Now that we have defined both the fitness function and RPT, we can define in general an
evolutionary operator: let
, X be a set (the parameter space) and
:X
T
,T H ,
a set. The mapping –
H
is an evolutionary operator. The set of evolutionary operators is denoted as EVOP H , , X ,
.
There are three common evolutionary operators: recombination, mutation and selection. These
three operators are roughly analogous to their similarly named counterparts in genetics. The
application of them in EAs strictly follows Darwin - survival of the fittest.
In Merkle and Lamont‟s definition of the recombination operator r
there exists P
H ,
X and
EVOP H , , X ,
If
such that one individual in the offspring population r P
depends on more than individual of P then r is referred to as a recombination operator.
A mutation is defined in the following manner. Let m EVOP H , , X ,
, for every
X and for every
. If for every P H
and if each individual in the offspring population m
depends on at most one individual of P then m is called a mutation operator.
20
P
Finally for selection let s
EVOP H , , X T H , ),
cases and if s satisfies a s
,
( P)
. If P H ,
a P then s is a selection operator.
21
X,
:H
in all
| 5cs.CE
|
G ENERATIVE T EMPORAL M ODELS WITH M EMORY
Mevlana Gemici∗ , Chia-Chun Hung∗ , Adam Santoro∗ , Greg Wayne∗
Shakir Mohamed, Danilo J. Rezende, David Amos, Timothy Lillicrap
arXiv:1702.04649v2 [cs.LG] 21 Feb 2017
DeepMind, London
A BSTRACT
We consider the general problem of modeling temporal data with long-range dependencies, wherein new observations are fully or partially predictable based on
temporally-distant, past observations. A sufficiently powerful temporal model
should separate predictable elements of the sequence from unpredictable elements, express uncertainty about those unpredictable elements, and rapidly identify novel elements that may help to predict the future. To create such models,
we introduce Generative Temporal Models augmented with external memory systems. They are developed within the variational inference framework, which provides both a practical training methodology and methods to gain insight into the
models’ operation. We show, on a range of problems with sparse, long-term temporal dependencies, that these models store information from early in a sequence,
and reuse this stored information efficiently. This allows them to perform substantially better than existing models based on well-known recurrent neural networks,
like LSTMs.
1
I NTRODUCTION
Many of the data sets we use in machine learning applications are sequential, whether these be
natural language and speech processing data, streams of high-definition video, longitudinal timeseries from medical diagnostics, or spatio-temporal data in climate forecasting. Generative Temporal
Models (GTMs) are a core requirement for these applications. Generative Temporal Models are
also important components of intelligent agents, as they permit counterfactual reasoning, physical
predictions, robot localisation, and simulation-based planning among other capacities (Sutton, 1991;
Deisenroth and Rasmussen, 2011; Watter et al., 2015; Levine and Abbeel, 2014; Assael et al., 2015).
These tasks require models of high-dimensional observation sequences and contain complex, long
temporal dependencies—requirements that most available GTMs are unable to fulfil. Developing
such GTMs is the aim of this paper.
Many GTMs—whether they are linear or nonlinear, deterministic or stochastic—assume that the underlying temporal dynamics is governed by low-order Markov transitions and use fixed-dimensional
sufficient statistics. Examples of such models include Hidden Markov Models (Rabiner, 1989), and
linear dynamical systems such as Kalman filters and their non-linear extensions (Kalman, 1960;
Ghahramani and Hinton, 1996; Krishnan et al., 2015). The fixed-order Markov assumption used
in these models is insufficient for characterising many systems of practical relevance. Bialek et al.
(2001) quantitatively show that Markov assumptions fail to describe physical systems with longrange correlations, and fail to approximate the long-distance dependencies in written literature.
Models that instead maintain information in large, variable-order histories, e.g., recurrent neural
networks (Pearlmutter, 1995), can have significant advantages over ones constrained by fixed-order
Markov assumptions.
Most recently proposed GTMs, like variational recurrent neural networks (VRNNs) (Chung et al.,
2015b) and Deep Kalman Filters (Krishnan et al., 2015), are built upon well-known recurrent neural networks, like Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) (Hochreiter and Schmidhuber, 1997) and
∗
Equal Contributions.
1
Gated Recurrent Units (GRUs) (Chung et al., 2015a). In principle, these recurrent networks can
solve variable-order Markovian problems, as the additive dynamics are designed to store and protect
information over long intervals. In practice, they scale poorly when higher capacity storage is required. These RNNs are typically densely connected, so the parametric complexity of the model can
grow quadratically with the memory capacity. Furthermore, their recurrent dynamics must serve two
competing roles: they must preserve information in a stable state for later retrieval, and they must
perform relevant computations to distill information for immediate use. These limitations point to
the need for RNNs that separate memory storage from computation.
Recurrent networks that successfully separate memory storage from computation have been developed for several settings such as algorithm learning (Graves et al., 2014; Grefenstette et al., 2015;
Joulin and Mikolov, 2015; Reed and de Freitas, 2015; Riedel et al., 2016; Vinyals et al., 2015),
symbolic reasoning (Weston et al., 2014; Sukhbaatar et al., 2015), and natural language processing
(Bahdanau et al., 2014; Kumar et al., 2015; Hermann et al., 2015; Kadlec et al., 2016). These recurrent networks store information in a memory buffer and use differentiable addressing mechanisms
(often called “differentiable attention”) to efficiently optimise reading from and writing to memory.
The particular details of a system’s memory access mechanisms play a critical role in determining
its data efficiency.
We demonstrate that generative temporal models with memory (GTMMs) exhibit a significantly
enhanced capacity to solve tasks involving complex, long-term temporal dependencies. We develop
a common architecture for generative temporal models and study four instantiations that each use
a different type of memory system. These four models allow us to show how different memory
systems are adapted to different types of sequential structure and the resulting impact on modelling
success, data-efficiency, and generation quality. Our models are distinct from the one presented by
Li et al. (2016), who developed a deep generative model for images posessing an attentional lookup
mechanism. For Li et al. (2016), the memory contains a table of parameters that is not updated within
a sequence. Instead, it is a table of biases that is jointly optimised for end-to-end performance. In
contrast, our systems dynamically update the memory within each sequence.
We structure our discussion by first describing the general approach for designing generative temporal models and performing variational inference (Section 2). We then compare GTMMs with
VRNNs (Chung et al., 2015b) on a set of visual sequence tasks designed to stress different problems
that arise when modelling information with long time dependencies. Finally, we make strides toward scaling the models to richer perceptual modelling in a three-dimensional environment. In the
process, we make the following technical contributions:
• We develop a general architecture for generative models with memory. This architecture allows
us to develop GTMMs based on four memory systems: a new positional memory architecture
referred to as an Introspection Network, the Neural Turing Machine (NTM) (Graves et al., 2014),
the Least-Recently Used access mechanism (LRU) (Santoro et al., 2016), and the Differentiable
Neural Computer (DNC) (Graves et al., 2016).
• We show that variational inference makes it easy to train scalable models capable of handling
high-dimensional input streams leading to new state-of-the-art temporal VAEs.
• We show that our new models outperform the current state-of-the-art for GTMs based on several
tasks that range from generative variants of the copy task to one-shot recall across long time
delays.
• We show that our GTMMs can model realistic 3D environments and demonstrate that these models capture important aspects of physical and temporal consistency, such as coherently generating
first-person views under loop closure.
2
G ENERATIVE T EMPORAL M ODELS
Generative temporal models (GTMs), such as Kalman filters, non-linear dynamical systems, hidden Markov models, switching state-space models, and change-point models (Särkkä, 2013) are a
popular choice for modeling temporal and sequential data using latent variables. These models explain a set of observations x≤T = {x1 , x2 , . . . , xT } with a set of corresponding latent variables
2
(a) Variational RNNs
(b) Autoreg. dynamics
(c) Latent-only
Figure 1: Variants of generative temporal models. Circled variables are stochastic; boxed variables
are deterministic. Solid lines show dependencies in the generative model; dashed lines show additional dependencies for the inference model.
z≤T = {z1 , z2 , . . . , zT } and specify the joint distribution
pθ (x≤T , z≤T ) =
T
Y
pθ (xt |fx (z≤t , x<t ))pθ (zt |fz (z<t , x<t )),
(1)
t=1
where θ are model parameters. This formulation supports a wide range of models, some variants
of which are shown in Fig. 1. Particular examples include non-linear state space models (Tornio
et al., 2007), Deep Kalman Filters (Krishnan et al., 2015), and stochastic recurrent neural networks
(Fraccaro et al., 2016; Bayer and Osendorfer, 2014). A particular model can be specified in Eq. (1)
by fixing the distributions and the functional dependencies on the conditioned variables.
• Distributions. We typically assume that the prior distribution pθ (zt |fz (z<t , x<t )) is a Gaussian
and the likelihood function pθ (xt |fx (z≤t , x<t )) is any distribution appropriate for the observed
data, such as a Gaussian for continuous observations or a Bernoulli for binary data.
• Conditional dependencies. Our models introduce a deterministic hidden-state variable ht that is
modified at every time point using a transition map ht = fh (ht−1 , xt , zt ). The function fz (ht−1 )
is a prior map that describes the non-linear dependence on past observations and latent variables,
using the hidden state, and provides the parameters of the latent variable distribution. The nonlinear function fx (zt , ht−1 ) is an observation map that provides the parameters of the likelihood
function, and depends on the latent variables and state. These functions are specified using deep
neural networks, which can by fully-connected, convolutional, or recurrent networks.
The most general model retains all possible dependencies between latent variables and deterministic
state variables in its maps: the transition map ht = fh (ht−1 , xt , zt ) is parameterised by an LSTM
network and depends on the history variable ht−1 , the current observation xt , and the current latent
variable zt ; the observation map fx (ht−1 , zt ) depends on the past history and the current latent
variable. This is the structure used by Chung et al. (2015b) in variational RNNs (VRNN) in figure
1a. VRNNs forms the baseline in our comparisons since it retains all possible dependencies within
the model and provides one of the best existing models. Other dependency structures can also be
considered, although they are not used in this paper: GTMs with autoregressive dynamics (figure 1b)
have a transition map that depends only on visible variables, i.e. ht = fh (ht−1 , xt ), and other statespace models use observation maps that depends only on latent variables pθ (xt |x<t , z≤t ) = fx (zt ).
2.1
VARIATIONAL I NFERENCE FOR GTM S
Having specified a model (1), our task is to infer the posterior distribution of the latent variables and learn the model parameters. Variational inference is currently one of the most widelyused approaches, since it is well suited to problems with high-dimensional observations and highdimensional parameter spaces. Variational inference also allows for the design of fast and scalable
algorithms, is easily composed with other gradient-based learning systems, and provides tools for
principled model evaluation and comparison. To compute the marginal probability of the observed
data p(x≤T ), we must integrate out any latent variables z≤T . This integration is often intractable
and variational methods compute marginal probabilities by transforming this intractable integration
3
problem into a tractable optimization problem. We construct a variational bound on the log-marginal
likelihood as follows:
Z
pθ (x≤T , z≤T )
log p(x≤T ) = log pθ (x≤T , z≤T )dz≤T = log Eqφ (z≤T |x≤T )
(2)
qφ (z≤T |x≤T )
≥ Eqφ (z≤T |x≤T ) [log pθ (x≤T |z≤T )] − KL [qφ (z≤T |x≤T )kpθ (z≤T )] = F(q; θ). (3)
In Eq. (2), we rewrote the expectation in terms of a distribution qφ (z≤T |x≤T ) with variational
parameters φ. In equation (3), by application of Jensen’s inequality, we obtained a lower bound on
the marginal likelihood; KL[qkp] is the Kullback-Leibler divergence between distributions q and p.
This lower bound (3), known as the negative free energy, has two terms that trade off reconstruction
accuracy (the expected log-likelihood term) against the complexity of the posterior approximation
(the KL-divergence term), and provides a tractable objective function for optimization. In this form,
the distribution qφ (z≤T |x≤T ) is an approximation to the true posterior distribution over the latent
variables pθ (z≤T |x≤T ).
We further choose an auto-regressive form for this distribution.
QT
Qt−1
qφ (z≤T |x≤T ) = t=1 qφ (zt |z<t , x≤t ); qφ (z<t |x<t ) = τ =1 qφ (zτ |z<τ , x≤τ ).
(4)
This choice of approximate posterior distribution allows us to rewrite the total free energy F as the
sum of per-step free energies Ft :
PT
F(q; θ) = t=1 Eqφ (z<t |x<t ) [Ft ( q; θ)]
(5)
Ft = Eqφ (zt |z<t ,x≤t ) [log pθ (xt |z≤t , x<t )] − KL [qφ (zt |z<t , x≤t )kpθ (zt |z<t , x<t )]
(6)
A detailed derivation appears in Appendix A.
Recent approaches for variational inference use two additional tools to optimize the free energy.
First, since the expectations in (5) and (6) are typically not known in closed form, the gradient of (6)
is computed using a Monte Carlo estimator. For continuous latent variables, the pathwise derivative
(reparameterisation trick) can be used (Fu, 2005; Rezende et al., 2014; Kingma and Welling, 2014).
Second, the approximate posterior distribution q is represented by an inference (or recognition)
model whose outputs are the parameters of the posterior distribution. Inference networks amortise
the cost of inference across all posterior computations and make joint optimisation of the model and
the variational parameters possible. The inference model qφ (zt |fq (x≤t , z<t )) uses a posterior map
fq specified by a deep network that provides the parameters of the q-distribution as a function of the
current observation, and the past history of latent variables and observations. Latent variable models
trained using amortised variational inference and Monte Carlo gradient estimation are referred to
as variational auto-encoders (VAEs) (Kingma and Welling, 2014). For generative temporal models,
they are referred to as temporal VAEs.
3
G ENERATIVE T EMPORAL M ODELS WITH E XTERNAL M EMORY
In existing models, temporal structure is captured by LSTM networks with state variables ht (Fig.
1). As we summarised in the introduction and will exhibit in the experiments, LSTMs are powerful
sequence models but suffer from the limitation that they strongly couple memory capacity with
recurrent processing and the number of trainable parameters. This limitation can result in slow
learning or demand large models to achieve high capacity memory. To overcome this issue, we
now develop generative temporal models with memory (GTMMs), i.e. ones that are augmented with
external memory systems.
We modify our temporal VAEs to rely on the output of an external memory system, which at every
point in time is queried to produce a memory context Ψt . The prior and the posterior used become:
Prior
pθ (zt |z<t , x<t ) = N (zt |fzµ (Ψt−1 ), fzσ (Ψt−1 ))
Posterior qφ (zt |z<t , x≤t ) = N (zt |fqµ (Ψt−1 , xt ), fqσ (Ψt−1 , xt ))
(7)
(8)
where we use a prior that is a diagonal Gaussian that depends on the memory context through the
prior map fz , and use a diagonal Gaussian approximate posterior that depends on the observation
xt and the memory context Ψt−1 through a posterior map fq . We show a stochastic computational
4
…
Mt-1
Mt
Mt+1
Ψt-1
Ψt
Ψt+1
zt
zt+1
zt+2
xt
xt+1
xt+2
…
ht-1
wt
ht-1
kt
wt
zt-1
Bt-1
Ψt-1
zt-1
Bt-1
Ψt-1
c
Figure 2: Components of a generative temporal model with external memory. (Left) High-level
structure of the model showing the memory system M and how it connects to the generative model.
Red and green lines indicate writing and reading operations, respectively. At update t, the controller
state from time t − 1 is combined with the latent variable from time t − 1 to produce the attention
weight. This produces a memory context that is only a function of the data that were in memory
before time t, so we denote it Ψt−1 . (Middle) Schematic of the introspective memory system.
(Right) Schematic of memory systems like NTM and DNC.
graph for the modified generative process in Fig. 2. This structure is generic and flexible and allows
any type of memory system to be used, allowing the remainder of the system to be unchanged since
all dependencies are through the memory context Ψt .
External memory systems comprise two components: an external memory Mt , which stores latent
variables zt (or transformations of them), and a controller, which implements the addressing scheme
that informs memory storage and retrieval. Two types of addressing schemes are possible: contentbased addressing accesses memories based on their similarity to a given cue, while position-based
addressing accesses memories based on their position within the memory-store. We now expand
on four types of memory systems that have different characteristics, describing the specific memory
and controllers used, and how the final memory context Ψt is computed.
3.1
I NTROSPECTIVE -GTMM S
We now develop an external memory system that uses a position-based addressing scheme for fast
learning of temporal dependencies, related to the Pointer Networks of Vinyals et al. (2015). It is able
to effectively handle sequences with temporally-extended dependency structures, trains quickly, and
can be robustly applied to a wide variety of tasks (and we verify this in the experimental section).
We refer to this memory system as an introspection network.
Memory. The memory M is a first-in-first-out buffer with at most L storage locations into which
latent variables zt are written as they are generated at each time step. It is natural to directly store
the latent variables, since they are compressed representations of the data at each time point. This
type of memory does not require the model to learn how to write to memory, but only how to read
from it. This feature is what enables fast learning.
Controller. The controller is responsible for memory retrieval. At every time step t, the controller
first updates the hidden states using an LSTM network frnn (Eq. 9), which fuses information from
the previous hidden state ht−1 and the previously generated latent variable zt−1 . If additional
context information ct is available, then this is also included as an input. To access a memory, softattention weights are computed using an attention network fatt based on the output of the controller
ht (Eq. 10). A set of R attention weights (or read heads) is used to retrieve multiple memories at
the same time. Each attention weight wtr is used to compute a weighted average over the rows of
the memory matrix to produce a retrieved memory vector φrt .
State update
ht = frnn (ht−1 , zt−1 , ct )
Attention wtr = fatt (ht ); kwtr k = 1, wtr [i] > 0
Retrieved memory
φrt = wtr · Mt−1
(9)
(10)
(11)
A number of attention functions fatt can be used, including softmax
P and Gaussian. We make use of
normalised linear attention with softplus outputs wt = k(ht )/ u k(hu ), where the function k is
a deep feed-forward network. This attention system proved easy to use and did not require special
initialisation. In this model, we found that softmax attention had slower convergence.
5
Gating mechanism. The ability to retrieve multiple memories φrt makes it possible for the latent
variables zt to depend on a variable number of past latent variables. We allow the network to
adjust the importance of each of the retrieved memories φrt by learning correction biases gtr . The
corrections are passed through a sigmoid function σ(·) and element-wise multiplied with the context
vector.
Memory context
Ψrt = φrt
r
σ(gt−1
)
(12)
The final memory context Ψt that is the output of the memory system is the concatenation of the
memory-contexts for each read-head, Ψt = [Ψ1t , Ψ2t , . . . , ΨR
t ], and forms the memory context that
is passed to the generative model. The complete flow of information in the Introspection Network is
shown in the stochastic computational graph in Fig. 2.
3.2
M ODELS WITH C ONTENT-BASED A DDRESSING
Introspective GTMMs can learn fast, but their simple memory structure limits the range of applications to which they can be applied. We now develop GTMMs with three alternative types of
memory architectures: the Neural Turing Machine (NTM) (Graves et al., 2014), which combines
both content-based and positional addressing; Least-Recently Used (LRU) access, which exclusively
employs content-based addressing; and the Differentiable Neural Computer (DNC) (Graves et al.,
2016), which uses content-based addressing and a mechanism of positional addressing that links positions in memory based on temporal adjacency of writing. We call these models the NTM-GTMM,
LRU-GTMM, and DNC-GTMM, respectively. We describe high-level aspects of the memory and
controllers used, but defer detailed discussion of the properties and alternative parameterisations to
Graves et al. (2014), Santoro et al. (2016) and Graves et al. (2016).
Memory. Unlike the first-in-first-out buffer used previously, the memory for NTMs and DNCs are
a generic storage that allows information to be written to, and read from any location.
Controller. The controller uses an LSTM network frnn (Eq. 13) that updates the state-history
ht and the external memory Mt using the latent variables from the previous time step and any
additional, context information ct on which the generative model is conditioned:
State update
(ht , Mt ) = frnn (ht−1 , Mt−1 , zt−1 , ct )
(13)
To perform a content-based read of R items from the memory Mt , the controller generates a set
of keys krt (14), and compares them to each row of the memory Mt−1 using a cosine similarity
measure to yield a set of soft attention weights (15). The retrieved memory φrt is then obtained by a
weighted sum of the attention weights and the memory Mt−1 (16).
r
krt = fkey
(ht );
Keys
Attention
Retrieved memory
wtr
r ∈ {1, . . . , R}
wtr [i]
= fatt (Mt−1 , kt );
≥
r
r
φt = wt · Mt−1
0; kwtr k
(14)
=1
(15)
(16)
The memory context Ψt that is passed to the generative model is the concatenation of the retrieved
memories for each read-head and the controller state, Ψt = [φ1t , . . . , φR
t , ht ].
4
E VALUATION M ETHODOLOGY
We evaluated our models both qualitatively and quantitatively. Qualitative assessment involved the
visual inspection of generated sequences; for example, if the task were to copy a particular portion
of an observed sequence after some set number of steps, then this copy procedure should be evident in sequences generated by the models. Qualitative assessments revealed significant differences
between models even when differences in their variational lower bounds were minimal. We also
6
Table 1: Number of parameters used in models.
Model
VRNN
Introspective-GTMM
NTM-GTMM
LRU-GTMM
DNC-GTMM
Digits and characters
1,884,177
1,863,107
1,869,381
1,866,282
1,859,336
3D environments
5,912,706
5,972,806
5,986,692
5,979,115
5,980,327
used three quantitative metrics to gather a more complete picture of the model behaviour: first, the
variational lower bound objective function, tracked across training; second, the KL-divergence at
a particular time-point for every training sequence (the last time-point per episode) tracked across
training steps; and third, the per time-point KL-divergences averaged over a batch of sequences after
training was completed.
Per time-step KL-divergences, KL [qφ (zt |z<t , x≤t )kpθ (zt |z<t , x<t )], measure the number of bits
of additional information needed to represent the posterior distribution relative to the prior distribution over the latent variable being used to explain the current observation. They indicate the amount
of prior knowledge the model contains. If a KL-divergence is close to zero, then the current observation is fully-predictable from previous information. For the tasks considered here, which were
defined by random sequences at every episode, this would imply that the model stores information in
memory from the beginning of the episode to construct predictive priors for the rest of the episode.
Calculating this quantity across training sequences for the last time point in each sequence (the
second metric) demonstrates how quickly the memory system becomes useful for prediction across
training (the last time point in our problems was always the most predictable). Viewing the average
per time-step KL, averaged over a batch of sequences after training (the third metric), indicates how
much information a trained model gathers throughout a sequence to make predictions.
4.1
T RAINING D ETAILS
Our posterior and observation maps used convolutional and deconvolutional networks, in some cases
with residual, skip connections (He et al., 2015). Refer to Appendix B for explicit details. All
models were trained by stochastic gradient descent on the variational lower bound (Eq. 6) using the
Adam optimizer (Kingma and Ba, 2014) with a learning rate of 10−3 (except for sequences with
> 100 steps, where we used 10−4 ). Mini-batches of 10 training sequences were used for computing
gradients in all tasks. For tasks involving digits and characters, we used latent variables of size 32;
for the 3D environment, we used latent variables of size 256.
We used five read heads in all tasks. The number of memory slots used for the GTMMs was taken
to be the same as the number of steps in the training sequences in each task, except for the LRUGTMM, which used a number of slots that was five times the number of time steps (note: the LRU
ties the number of write heads to the number of read heads, and with many write heads it fills up a
small memory quickly). The hidden state size of the LSTM in all models was chosen to keep the
total number of parameters within ∼ 5% of one another (see Table 1).
For each model, we ran 20 replicas with the same hyperparameters. When we performed quantifications for figures, we first averaged over all 10 example sequences in a mini-batch, then we computed
means and standard errors across the replicas for the model type.
5
E XPERIMENTAL R ESULTS
We tested our models on seven tasks that probed their capacity to learn and make predictions about
temporal data with complex dependencies. Tasks involved image-sequence modelling, and offered
tests of deduction, spatial reasoning, and one-shot generalisation. Example training sequences are
provided for each task described below. In Appendix C, we present generated samples for most of
the tasks. For tasks with artificial data sets, pseudo-code to generate the training sequences is given
in Appendix D.
7
negative VLB
negative VLB
negative VLB
Figure 3: Example sequence for the perfect recall task using a pre-recall interval l = 20 followed
by a recall interval k = 5.
Figure 4: Top Row: the perfect recall task with l = 15 and k = 5. Left: The average KullbackLeibler divergence (KLD) per frame, serving as a measure of prediction error between the prior
and posterior. Each of the models learned that there is repetition at frame 10, but the Introspective
GTMM exhibited the lowest error. Middle: The last frame KLD was also lowest for the Introspective
GTMM at convergence. Right: The Introspective GTMM convergenced fastest and to the lowest
level, but we see that the negative variational lower bound was close for all models. Middle Row:
the perfect recall task with l = 20 and k = 5. The results were roughly similar. Bottom Row: the
perfect recall task with l = 50 and k = 5. Over substantially larger time intervals, the models were
able to detect regularity in the data sequences.
5.1
P ERFECT R ECALL
Training sequences consisted of k randomly sampled MNIST digits to be remembered during a prerecall interval, which extended for l time steps. Thus, l − k digits were distractor stimuli. A recall
interval occurred after l steps, during which the first k images were presented again. We constructed
variants of the task with k = 5 and l ∈ {15, 20, 50}. Fig. 3 shows a typical training sequence for
this task. To succeed at this task, the models had to encode and store the first k images, protect
them during the distractor interval, and retrieve them during the recall interval. Successful use of
memory would elicit a drop in the KL-divergence during the recall interval, since information stored
in memory – and not information extracted from the current observation – would be used for image
reconstruction.
8
negative VLB
negative VLB
negative VLB
Figure 5: In the parity recall task, the recall interval consisted of images indicating the evenness or
oddness of each of the initial k images.
Figure 6: Top Row: the parity recall task with l = 15 and k = 5. The difference between models
was minimal here, likely because the memory storage required to solve the task is only k = 5 bits.
Middle Row: the task with parameters l = 20 and k = 5. Bottom Row: with l = 50 and k = 5.
Again, all models succeeded equally despite the longer delay.
The performance for this task is reported in Fig. 4. All models showed the effect that the KLdivergence between the prior and posterior becomes reduced at the beginning of the recall phase.
However, for the GTMMs and especially the Introspective GTMM, the reduction was most significant. This implies that the models were predicting the arriving frames based on memory. The effect
was more pronounced the larger the sequence length.
5.2
PARITY R ECALL
In contrast to the previous experiment in which exact recall of the images was demanded, in the
parity recall task we asked the model to identify and report on a latent property of the data. During
the recall interval, the model must generate a sequence of k 0-s and 1-s, matched to the parity of the
first k images. That is, the first recalled digit should be a zero if the first digit in the initial sequence
was odd, and one if it was even. Fig. 5 shows a typical training sequence. Successful models, then,
need to implicitly classify input digits. Although the computation required for this task is more
complicated than for perfect recall, the information content that is to be stored is actually smaller –
i.e., a single bit per image.
9
negative VLB
Figure 7: For the one-shot recall task, sequences at test time were created from a set of characters
that were not used during training. Even so, perfect recall should still be possible.
Figure 8: The one-shot recall task with experimental parameters l = 20 and k = 5. Again, because
the task was very similar to perfect recall in structure, the models performed in a comparable rank
order, with the Introspective GTMM showing significant KL reductions when the sequence was
predictable from memory.
Less memory is required for parity recall than for perfect recall as the details of each image need
not be retained; instead, only the parity of each image should be tracked, requiring 5 bits total. All
models performed satisfactorily here, as we see in Fig. 6, exhibiting KL reductions when the number
of possible digit classes drops from 10 to only 1 (the remembered parity digit images). The models
were able to contend with long delays equally, suggesting that the primary advantage for GTMMs
over VRNNs is in tasks that require the storage of a large number of bits.
5.3
O NE -S HOT R ECALL
We also examined the abilities of the GTMMs to memorise novel information by testing on sequences of data on which they had not been directly trained. A typical training sequence was shown
in Fig. 7, where the images at every point in time are drawn from the Omniglot data set (Lake et al.,
2015). The training data consisted of all 50 alphabets with three characters excluded from each alphabet. The unseen characters were used to form new, unseen sequences at test time. The task was
otherwise the same as the perfect recall task, but the demands on the generative model and memory
were more substantial.
The GTMMs all outperformed the VRNN with the Introspective GTMM showing significant reductions in KL divergence at the beginning of the recall phase (Fig. 8). This was notable because the
memorised images are entirely novel hold-outs from the training set. Thus, the GTMMs, and in
particular the Introspective GTMM, were able to construct useful latent variable representations for
novel stimuli, store them in memory, and use them to predict future events during the recall phase.
5.4
L EARNING DYNAMIC D EPENDENCIES
The preceding tasks have all demanded ordered recall of the sequence. Here, we tested whether
recall in a more complicated order is possible. A typical training sequence is shown in Figure 9.
We began with a sequence of l digits as before. The next k digits were generated by an “index-andrecall” game. In the figure example, the final digit in the pre-recall interval is an 8. The numerical
value of the digit indicates from which position in the sequence the next digit is copied. Here,
position 8 contains a 3, which is the first digit in the recall interval. Position 3 contains a 0, and
so on. Successful models therefore had to learn to classify digits and to use the class labels to find
images based on their temporal order of presentation.
10
negative VLB
Figure 9: Training sequence for the dynamic dependency task following an index-and-recall game
in which each image digit provided a positional reference to the next digit in the sequence order.
Figure 10: Dynamic dependency task with l = 20 and k = 5: The DNC-GTMM and the Introspective GTMM were the best at this complex addressing task.
This task requires the models to learn an algorithmic addressing procedure in which the current
image indicates the time point the next image was stored, allowing the memory address storing the
latent variables from that time point to be looked up. All of the GTMMs perform considerably better
than the VRNN on the task, with the most substantial improvements achieved by the Introspective
GTMM and the DNC-GTMM (Fig. 10).
5.5
S IMILARITY-C UED R ECALL
The last task probed positional indexing, but here we construct a task that demands content-based
addressing. In each training sequence, we first present a random sequence of digits for l time steps.
The k digits in the recall interval are a randomly chosen, contiguous sub-sequence of length k from
the pre-recall interval (Fig. 11). To solve this task, a model must be able to use the first image in
the recall interval as a cue, find the most similar image to the cue that it has seen previously, and
produce the temporal sequence that followed it.
Similarity-cued recall played more strongly to the advantages of memory systems with contentbased addressing. The task required using a cue image to find the images in sequence that followed
the cue during the pre-recall exposure phase. To perform this operation, the memory systems with
content-based addressing, the NTM, LRU, and DNC, could encode the cue and look up similar
feature encodings in memory. As long as there was a mechanism to iterate through the subsequent
latent variables, the task can then be easily solved. DNC-GTMM could use its temporal transition
links for this task, as described in (Graves et al., 2016). Because it lacks content-based addressing,
the Introspective-GTMM did not perform better than the VRNN (Fig. 12).
5.6
NAVIGATION IN AN MNIST M AP
An important motivation for developing GTMMs was the desire to improve the capacity of agents
to understand the spatial structure of their environments. As an example problem, we created a 2D
environment represented by a 4 × 4 grid, where each grid cell contained a random MNIST digit
(Fig. 13). In this case, instead of an agent, we took a random walk on the grid using actions up,
down, left, and right for 25 steps to move between neighbouring locations, receiving an observation
corresponding to the current grid cell. The actions were always treated as context variables and were
not predicted by the GTMMs. We expected that the GTMMs conditioned on random walk action
sequences would be able to generate the same observation in case a grid cell is revisited in an action
sequence; that is, the GTMM should have maintained a coherent map of an environment.
11
negative VLB
Figure 11: Example training sequence for the similarity-cued recall Task.
Figure 12: Similarity-cued recall with temporal dependencies of length l = 20 and k = 5. The
memory models with content-based addressing, i.e., the NTM-, LRU-, and DNC-GTMM, showed
the most significant KL reductions and lowest task losses.
Since the actions are generated by a random walk process, the structure of this problem is poorly
captured by memory addressing mechanisms that are based on time or positional order in a sequence. Instead, models that used content-based addressing could encode the sequence of actions
alongside the latent variable representations of the images. When it was necessary to predict what
is present at an already visited location, content-based addressing could be used to look up the latent variables based on the action sequence. Since any grid location could be reached via multiple
routes, the models had also to capture the invariance that action sequences should be converted into
displacements from the origin. The DNC- and LRU-GTMM performed best at this task (Figure 14),
exhibiting significant KL reductions as more of the environment was explored. In Fig. 15, we also
show generation of a sequences in the maze by each model. Only LRU-GTMM and DNC-GTMM
consistently generated the same digits when returning to the same positions.
Although the NTM-backed GTMM has content-based addressing, its ability to allocate free locations
in memory is generally inferior to the abilities of models using LRUs and DNCs. The LRU- and
DNC-based mechanisms could easily store new memories but also could collocate the new memories
with context information registering the computed position on the grid each image was located.
5.7
T OWARDS C OHERENT G ENERATION IN R EALISTIC 3D E NVIRONMENTS
Ultimately, we wish to design agents that operate in realistic environments and can learn from
sequential information, using memory to form predictions. These agents should possess spatiotemporally coherent memories of environments, understanding that walls typically do not shift and
that undisturbing movements change camera angles but not scene arrangements. Our first study
of this problem was to test whether GTMMs can maintain consistent predictions when provided
with frames from an in-place rotation of a camera for two full turns. These experiments used a
procedurally-generated 3D maze environment with random wall configurations, textures, and object
positions.
The rotational dynamics of the environment included acceleration, so each frame did not represent
a view from an angle that is equally distributed around the unit circle. The models had to cope with
this structure. Additionally, because the frames were captured at discrete moments, the models had
to learn to interpolate past views after the full turn, instead of merely copying frames from the first
rotation. The rotational period was t = 15 steps, and a full episode took place over t = 30 steps. An
example training sequence is shown in Figure 16. A successful generative model of this data had
to create random environment panoramas and generate views consistent with the panorama on the
second full turn.
12
negative VLB
Figure 13: A random walk action sequence was provided to the model along with images found at
each location. At boundaries, the action sequence was restricted to stay in bounds. Each action was
provided as a conditioning variable for generation that was not modeled itself.
Figure 14: MNIST Maze task. The GTMMs with content-based addressing acquired information
about the environment and could coherently model it.
In Fig. 17, we see that the VRNN had the lowest variational lower bound. However, in the generative
samples, it is clear that the VRNN was also incoherent across time, as it forgot information about
paintings on the walls and buildings on the skyline (Fig. 28). We argue that the more representative
quantification, of more significance than the training loss, is the Kullback-Leibler divergence of
the last frame, as well as the KL reduction at the time of the turn. These indicators showed that
the DNC-GTMM and Introspective-GTMM models were able to predict the redundant frames from
memory.
6
D ISCUSSION AND C ONCLUSIONS
The aim of this paper has been to open a research direction. We have seen that, on a range of
tasks, standard generative temporal models are limited by their memory capacity and memory access mechanisms. This has motivated the design of new generative temporal models with external
memory systems whose performance is in some cases qualitatively better.
We have tried to provide proofs of concept without extraneous complication: for example, our variational distributions are simple, diagonal Gaussians; we could consider more complex posterior
distributions, like those used in DRAW (Gregor et al., 2015), normalising flows (Rezende and Mohamed, 2015), auxiliary variables (Ranganath et al., 2016), or models with discrete variables (Eslami
et al., 2016). We have also aimed to explore the advantages and disadvantages of a variety of external memory mechanisms for generative temporal modelling. Our results suggest that none of the
architectures we report on is uniformly dominant across tasks. However, an interesting direction
of further research is strongly suggested by our results. Namely, we imagine that a new model,
combining the direct storage of latent variables, as in the Introspective-GTMM, with content-based
addressing, as in the NTM-, LRU-, and DNC-GTMM, could indeed prove to have performance that
is uniformly dominant across all tasks. Furthermore, many of these sparse memory access models
can be more efficiently implemented by using fast K-nearest neighbour lookup, though we did not
explore such savings here. We leave the development of these more sophisticated models to future
work.
The storage of latent variables or transformed latent variables in memory additionally suggests several intriguing extensions of our framework. Currently, the models are based on the mathematics
13
t = 10
t = 15
t = 20
t = 25
S
DNC
Intro.
LRU
NTM
VRNN
Actions
t=5
Figure 15: Generation examples in the MNIST Maze. Actions are shown in the top row. In each
column of that row, the last five actions at each time point (t = 5, 10, 15, . . . ) are indicated by yellow
arrows. The best four models of each type are shown in each row below. The first time a grid cell was
visited, the red pixel channel was turned on; the second time, a new image was generated and superimposed, with the red and green channels turned on (so overlaid image colour is red+green=yellow);
the third time, the blue channel was turned on, so the overlaid, generated image was white. We see
that the VRNN had inconsistent generations, as the subsequent visits to grid cells produced overlays
of different colours that did not share the same shape. The NTM and Introspection models were
by comparison better at coherent generation, and the LRU- and DNC-based GTMMs were the best
here, so that, for example, the white and yellow digits masked the underlying red digit.
14
negative VLB
Figure 16: A training sequence for a 30 timestep in-place rotation, where the period until repetition
was approximately 15 steps.
Figure 17: Realistic environments task. The VRNN had the lowest variational lower bound, but this
measure tells very little of the overall story. Instead, the DNC-GTMM and Introspective-GTMM
showed significant KL reductions when the sequence is predictable from memory, and this measure
translates into good behaviour during generation of samples.
of optimal filtering: they produce a sample at every time step that is drawn from the filtering posterior qφ (zt |z<t , x≤t ). Once latent variables are stored in memory, the formal distinction between
filtering and smoothing (with a non-temporally causal posterior qφ (zt |x≤T )) begins to break down.
We can imagine further mechanisms that modify previously written latent variables after the fact by
overwriting previously written locations. The explicit storage of latent variables in memory supports
this, whereas it would be difficult to precisely modify the component of the latent state that encodes
a historical latent variable in a more conventional, densely connected RNN.
15
R EFERENCES
J.-A. M. Assael, N. Wahlström, T. B. Schön, and M. P. Deisenroth. Data-efficient learning of feedback policies from image pixels using deep dynamical models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1510.02173,
2015.
D. Bahdanau, K. Cho, and Y. Bengio. Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and
translate. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.0473, 2014.
J. Bayer and C. Osendorfer.
Learning stochastic recurrent networks.
arXiv preprint
arXiv:1411.7610, 2014.
W. Bialek, I. Nemenman, and N. Tishby. Predictability, complexity, and learning. Neural computation, 13(11):2409–2463, 2001.
J. Chung, C. Gulcehre, K. Cho, and Y. Bengio. Gated feedback recurrent neural networks. arXiv
preprint arXiv:1502.02367, 2015a.
J. Chung, K. Kastner, L. Dinh, K. Goel, A. C. Courville, and Y. Bengio. A recurrent latent variable
model for sequential data. In Advances in neural information processing systems, pages 2962–
2970, 2015b.
M. Deisenroth and C. E. Rasmussen. Pilco: A model-based and data-efficient approach to policy
search. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on machine learning (ICML-11),
pages 465–472, 2011.
S. A. Eslami, N. Heess, T. Weber, Y. Tassa, D. Szepesvari, G. E. Hinton, et al. Attend, infer, repeat:
Fast scene understanding with generative models. In Advances In Neural Information Processing
Systems, pages 3225–3233, 2016.
M. Fraccaro, S. K. Sønderby, U. Paquet, and O. Winther. Sequential neural models with stochastic
layers. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2016.
M. C. Fu. Stochastic gradient estimation. Technical report, DTIC Document, 2005.
Z. Ghahramani and G. E. Hinton. Parameter estimation for linear dynamical systems. Technical report, Technical Report CRG-TR-96-2, University of Totronto, Dept. of Computer Science, 1996.
A. Graves, G. Wayne, and I. Danihelka. Neural turing machines. arXiv preprint arXiv:1410.5401,
2014.
A. Graves, G. Wayne, M. Reynolds, T. Harley, I. Danihelka, A. Grabska-Barwińska, S. G. Colmenarejo, E. Grefenstette, T. Ramalho, J. Agapiou, et al. Hybrid computing using a neural network with dynamic external memory. Nature, 538(7626):471–476, 2016.
E. Grefenstette, K. M. Hermann, M. Suleyman, and P. Blunsom. Learning to transduce with unbounded memory. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 1828–1836,
2015.
K. Gregor, I. Danihelka, A. Graves, D. Jimenez Rezende, and D. Wierstra. Draw: A recurrent neural
network for image generation. In ICML, 2015.
K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun. Deep residual learning for image recognition. arXiv preprint
arXiv:1512.03385, 2015.
K. M. Hermann, T. Kocisky, E. Grefenstette, L. Espeholt, W. Kay, M. Suleyman, and P. Blunsom.
Teaching machines to read and comprehend. In Advances in Neural Information Processing
Systems, pages 1693–1701, 2015.
S. Hochreiter and J. Schmidhuber. Long short-term memory. Neural computation, 9(8):1735–1780,
1997.
A. Joulin and T. Mikolov. Inferring algorithmic patterns with stack-augmented recurrent nets. In
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 190–198, 2015.
R. Kadlec, M. Schmid, O. Bajgar, and J. Kleindienst. Text understanding with the attention sum
reader network. arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.01547, 2016.
R. E. Kalman. A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. Journal of basic Engineering, 82(1):35–45, 1960.
D. P. Kingma and J. Ba. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. CoRR, 2014.
D. P. Kingma and M. Welling. Auto-encoding variational Bayes. In ICLR, 2014.
R. G. Krishnan, U. Shalit, and D. Sontag. Deep kalman filters. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.05121,
2015.
A. Kumar, O. Irsoy, J. Su, J. Bradbury, R. English, B. Pierce, P. Ondruska, I. Gulrajani, and
R. Socher. Ask me anything: Dynamic memory networks for natural language processing. arXiv
preprint arXiv:1506.07285, 2015.
B. M. Lake, R. Salakhutdinov, and J. B. Tenenbaum. Human-level concept learning through probabilistic program induction. Science, 350(6266):1332–1338, 2015.
16
S. Levine and P. Abbeel. Learning neural network policies with guided policy search under unknown
dynamics. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 1071–1079, 2014.
C. Li, J. Zhu, and B. Zhang. Learning to generate with memory. arXiv preprint arXiv:1602.07416,
2016.
B. A. Pearlmutter. Gradient calculations for dynamic recurrent neural networks: A survey. IEEE
Transactions on Neural networks, 6(5):1212–1228, 1995.
L. R. Rabiner. A tutorial on hidden markov models and selected applications in speech recognition.
Proceedings of the IEEE, 77(2):257–286, 1989.
R. Ranganath, D. Tran, and D. M. Blei. Hierarchical variational models. In International Conference
on Machine Learning, 2016.
S. Reed and N. de Freitas. Neural programmer-interpreters. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.06279, 2015.
D. J. Rezende and S. Mohamed. Variational inference with normalizing flows. arXiv preprint
arXiv:1505.05770, 2015.
D. J. Rezende, S. Mohamed, and D. Wierstra. Stochastic backpropagation and approximate inference in deep generative models. In ICML, 2014.
S. Riedel, M. Bošnjak, and T. Rocktäschel. Programming with a differentiable forth interpreter.
arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.06640, 2016.
A. Santoro, S. Bartunov, M. Botvinick, D. Wierstra, and T. Lillicrap. One-shot learning with
memory-augmented neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.06065, 2016.
S. Särkkä. Bayesian filtering and smoothing, volume 3. Cambridge University Press, 2013.
S. Sukhbaatar, J. Weston, R. Fergus, et al. End-to-end memory networks. In Advances in neural
information processing systems, pages 2440–2448, 2015.
R. S. Sutton. Dyna, an integrated architecture for learning, planning, and reacting. ACM SIGART
Bulletin, 2(4):160–163, 1991.
M. Tornio, A. Honkela, and J. Karhunen. Time series prediction with variational bayesian nonlinear
state-space models. In Proc. European Symp. on Time Series Prediction (ESTSP07), pages 11–19,
2007.
O. Vinyals, M. Fortunato, and N. Jaitly. Pointer networks. In Advances in Neural Information
Processing Systems, pages 2692–2700, 2015.
M. Watter, J. Springenberg, J. Boedecker, and M. Riedmiller. Embed to control: A locally linear latent dynamics model for control from raw images. In Advances in Neural Information Processing
Systems, pages 2746–2754, 2015.
J. Weston, S. Chopra, and A. Bordes. Memory networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1410.3916, 2014.
17
A
P ER S TEP VARIATIONAL L OWER B OUND
The variational bound gives
Z
log p(x) = log
dz p(x, z)
(17)
Z
q(z|x)
q(z|x)
p(x, z)
= log Eq(z|x)
q(z|x)
p(x, z)
≥ Eq(z|x) log
(by Jensen’s ineq.).
q(z|x)
= log
dz p(x, z)
(18)
(19)
(20)
For sequences of random variables, the corresponding inequality is
log p(x≤T ) ≥ Eq(z≤T |x≤T ) log
p(x≤T , z≤T )
.
q(z≤T |x≤T )
(21)
In our formulation, we assume the factorisations
p(x≤T , z≤T ) =
T
Y
p(xt |z≤T , x<t )p(zt |z<t , x<t )
t=1
and
q(z≤T |x≤T ) =
T
Y
q(zt |z<t , x≤t ).
t=1
These allow us to convert equation 21 into a per time-step bound. We have:
" T
#
X
Q
log p(x≤T ) ≥ E Tt=1 q(zt |z<t ,x≤t )
log p(xt |z≤t , x<t ) + log p(zt |z<t , x<t ) − log q(zt |z<t , x≤t )
t=1
(22)
"
= EQT
T
X
t=1 q(zt |z<t ,x≤t )
#
log p(xt |z≤t , x<t ) + log
t=1
Let Ct ≡ log p(xt |z≤t , x<t ) + log
p(zt |z<t ,x<t )
q(zt |z<t ,x≤t ) .
"
log p(x≤T ) ≥ EQT
t=1
p(zt |z<t , x<t )
.
q(zt |z<t , x≤t )
(23)
Then:
T
X
q(zt |z<t ,x≤t )
#
Ct
(24)
t=1
Z
Z
q(z1 |x1 )
=
z1
Z
q(z2 |z1 , x≤2 )· · ·
z2
q(zT |z<T , x≤T )
zT
T
X
Ct .
(25)
t=1
Each Ct is not a function of the elements of the set {zt+1 , zt+2 , . . . , zT }. Therefore, we can move
each Ct out from the integrals involving only those terms:
Z
Z
Z
=
q(z1 |x1 )C1
q(z2 |z1 , x≤2 )· · ·
q(zT |z<T , x≤T )
z
z2
z
Z 1
Z
Z T
+
q(z1 |x1 )
q(z2 |z1 , x≤2 )C2 · · ·
q(zT |z<T , x≤T )
z1
z2
zT
+ ...
Z
Z
Z
+
q(z1 |x1 )
q(z2 |z1 , x≤2 )· · ·
z1
z2
zT
18
q(zT |z<T , x≤T )CT
(26)
The interior integrals all sum to 1 since the q-s are distributions. Thus, we have:
Z
=
q(z1 |x1 )C1
z1
Z
Z
+
q(z1 |x1 )
q(z2 |z1 , x≤2 )C2
z1
z2
+ ...
Z
Z
Z
+
q(z1 |x1 )
q(z2 |z1 , x≤2 )· · ·
z1
z2
q(zT |z<T , x≤T )CT .
(27)
zT
We can write this more simply as
F=
T
X
EQtτ =1 q(zτ |z<τ ,x≤τ ) Ct .
(28)
t=1
Finally, we bring this expression into a more conventional form by writing
T
X
p(zt |z<t , x<t )
Q
t
F=
E τ =1 q(zτ |z<τ ,x≤τ ) log p(xt |z≤t , x<t ) + log
q(zt |z<t , x≤t )
t=1
T
X
p(zt |z<t , x<t )
EQt−1 q(zτ |z<τ ,x≤τ ) Eq(zt |z<t ,x≤t ) log p(xt |z≤t , x<t ) + log
=
τ =1
q(zt |z<t , x≤t )
t=1
T
X
=
EQt−1 q(zτ |z<τ ,x≤τ ) Eq(zt |z<t ,x≤t ) log p(xt |z≤t , x<t )
τ =1
t=1
− KL[q(zt |z<t , x≤t )||p(zt |z<t , x<t )] .
(29)
Bringing back the distributional parameters pθ and qφ yields an equation equivalent to the main text.
B
B.1
V ISUAL A RCHITECTURES
TASKS WITH D IGITS AND C HARACTERS
Convolution/
Deconvolution
N
Batch Normalization
{}
Concatenation
+
Sum
Rectified Linear Layer
7x7
5x5
N
3x3
Concatenation
{}
+
N
1x1
Figure 18: The first visual block.
The posterior map – that is, the mapping from inputs xt to latents zt – was implemented as a
convolutional neural network (CNN). The CNN consisted of two “blocks,” arranged in series (the
first block is shown in Figure 18). The first block was fed a 1 × 28 × 28 grey-scale image as input
(rescaling the input images if necessary), where the saturation was mapped into the range (−1, 1).
This input was passed to four, parallel, dimension-preserving convolutional streams, which each
19
convolved the input using 8 kernels of size 1 × 1, 3 × 3, 5 × 5, and 7 × 7, respectively, padding as
necessary for dimension-preservation. The outputs from the parallel streams were passed through
a batch-normalization layer and a rectified-linear layer, before being concatenated to a total of 32
feature-maps. These 32 feature-maps served as the input to a dimension-halving convolution using
a kernel of size 3 × 3, which was followed by a batch normalization layer and a rectified linear layer.
Thus, this first processing block functioned to take in a 32 × 32 image as input and return 32 featuremaps of size 16 × 16. A second, identical block followed from the first, except for two differences:
there was no batch normalization and rectified layer after the final convolution, and the final number
of kernels was 64. To produce a sample of a latent variable, we then mapped the kernels through a
linear layer to a vector of length 64. 32 of these dimensions were used to construct the mean µ and
32 were used to construct the vector log σ for the parameters of a Gaussian distribution. Together
with a sample from a standard normal , the latent was generated as zt = µt + σt t , thus completing
the posterior map.
The observation map – the mapping from latents and any recurrent deterministic variables to reconstructions x̂t – was identical to the posterior map, except convolution operations were replaced with
deconvolution operations.
B.2
TASKS I NVOLVING F RAMES OF 3D E NVIRONMENTS
For the three-dimensional environment visual model, our inputs included colour channels comprising 3 × 32 × 32 values. We used two separate pathways, one roughly to encode global information
across an image, and another roughly to encode local textures. The global information pathway
convolved the image using 128 5 × 5 kernels with stride 3, no padding. These were then passed
through 256 4 × 4 kernels with stride 2 without padding. Then the feature-maps were convolved
with 256 4 × 4 kernels with stride 1 without padding. This gave 256 1 × 1 super-pixels.
The local texture pathway had a convolutional layer with 16 kernels of size 4 × 4, stride 2, padding
of 1. The feature-maps were passed through another convolutional layer with 8 kernels of size 4 × 4,
stride 2, and padding of 1. This yielded a block of size 8 × 8 × 8, which was linearised to 512 vector
elements and concatenated with the 256 features from the global information pathway.
These were passed through a linear layer to produce a 250-dimensional µ and 250-dimensional log σ
for the latent distribution.
The observation map was the transpose of this model as before.
C
G ENERATED S AMPLES FOR S ELECT TASKS
VRNN
NTM
LRU
Intro.
DNC
Figure 19: Perfect recall with l = 10, k = 5. The last k = 5 frames should match the first 5.
20
VRNN
NTM
LRU
Intro.
DNC
Figure 20: Perfect recall with l = 20, k = 5. The last k = 5 frames should match the first 5.
VRNN
NTM
LRU
Intro.
DNC
...
...
...
...
...
Figure 21: Perfect recall with l = 50, k = 5. Intermediate frames are omitted. The last k = 5
frames should match the first 5.
VRNN
NTM
LRU
Intro.
DNC
Figure 22: Parity recall with l = 10, k = 5. Over the last 5 frames, a generated 0 indicates should
correspond to an even digit in the first five frames, and a generated 1 should correspond to an odd
digit.
21
VRNN
NTM
LRU
Intro.
DNC
Figure 23: Parity recall with l = 20, k = 5. Same as above.
...
...
...
...
...
VRNN
NTM
LRU
Intro.
DNC
Figure 24: Parity recall with l = 50, k = 5.
input
VRNN
continual generation
recon.
NTM
LRU
Intro.
DNC
Figure 25: One-shot recall with l = 20, k = 5. The last 5 generated images should match the first
5, even though these images were held out from the training set.
22
VRNN
NTM
LRU
Intro.
DNC
Figure 26: Dynamic dependency task with l = 20, k = 5. Starting from the fifth-to-last frame, the
numeric value of each digit should indicate the temporal position of the digit to retrieve next.
VRNN
NTM
LRU
Intro.
DNC
Figure 27: Content-based recall with l = 20, k = 5. The fifth-to-last frame is a repeat of a frame in
the pre-recall phase. A working model should have continued to generate the same sequence from
there.
23
24
recon.
continual generation
Figure 28: Rotation in a complex environment. The models observed 15 frames from the environment during one rotation, then generated corresponding frames
during a second rotation. The VRNN model clearly forgot information from the first rotation, but the other models clearly demonstrated memory of paintings on
the walls, floor colour, and buildings on the skyline.
DNC
Intro.
LRU
NTM
VRNN
D
P SEUDOCODE FOR G ENERATING A RTIFICIAL S EQUENCES WITH
C HARACTERS AND D IGITS
Algorithm 1 Training Sequence Generation for Perfect Recall/One-shot Recall Tasks
1:
2:
3:
4:
5:
6:
7:
8:
9:
10:
11:
procedure P ERFECT R ECALL /O NE S HOT R ECALL
generator ← instance generator from dataset (MNIST/OmniGlot)
l ← length of random sequence
k ← length of recall interval
sequence ← {}
. Pick a random sequence of instances from the dataset
for i = 1, l do
sequence[i] ← s ∼ generator()
. Repeat instances from the beginning of the sequence
for j = 1, k do
append(sequence, sequence[j])
return sequence
. Return the full sequence
Algorithm 2 Training Sequence Generation for Parity Recall Task
1:
2:
3:
4:
5:
6:
7:
8:
9:
10:
11:
12:
procedure PARITY R ECALL
generator ← instance generator from dataset (MNIST)
l ← length of random sequence
k ← length of recall interval
sequence, labels ← {}, {}
. Pick a random sequence of instances from
. the dataset and their labels
for i = 1, l do
sequence[i], labels[i] ← s, ls ∼ generator()
. Append random 0 or 1 instances based on the parity of the
. labels of instances from beginning of the sequence
for j = 1, k do
append(sequence, s ∼generator(label = parity(labels[j])))
return sequence
. Return full sequence
Algorithm 3 Training Sequence Generation for Dynamic Dependency Task
1:
2:
3:
4:
5:
6:
7:
8:
9:
10:
11:
12:
procedure DYNAMIC D EPENDENCY
generator ← instance generator from dataset (MNIST)
l ← length of random sequence
k ← length of recall interval
sequence, labels ← {}, {}
. Pick a random sequence of instances from
. the dataset and their labels
for i = 1, l do
sequence[i], labels[i] ← s, ls ∼ generator()
. Use the label of the previous instance as an 0-based address and
. append the instance located in that address in the sequence
for j = 1, k do
append(sequence, sequence[labels[l+j-1]] )
return sequence
. Return full sequence
Algorithm 4 Training Sequence Generation for Similarity-Cued Recall Tasks
1:
2:
3:
4:
5:
6:
7:
8:
9:
10:
11:
12:
procedure S IMILARITY BASED D EPENDENCY
generator ← instance generator from dataset (MNIST)
l ← length of random sequence
k ← length of recall interval
sequence ← {}
. Pick a random sequence of instances from the dataset
for i = 1, l do
sequence[i] ← s ∼ generator()
. Uniformly choose a random sub-sequence and
. append it to the end of the sequence
r ∼ Uniform[1, l − k]
sub-sequence ← sequence[r : r + k]
append(sequence, sub-sequence)
return sequence
. Return full sequence
25
| 9cs.NE
|
Compiling Quantum Circuits to Realistic Hardware
Architectures using Temporal Planners
Davide Venturelli1,2 , Minh Do3,4 , Eleanor Rieffel1 , Jeremy Frank4
arXiv:1705.08927v2 [quant-ph] 21 Dec 2017
1
NASA Ames Research Center, Quantum Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
USRA Research Institute for Advanced Computer Science (RIACS)
3
Stinger Ghaffarian Technologies (SGT Inc.)
4
NASA Ames Research Center, Planning and Scheduling Group
2
E-mail: [email protected]
2
Abstract. To run quantum algorithms on emerging gate-model quantum hardware,
quantum circuits must be compiled to take into account constraints on the hardware. For
near-term hardware, with only limited means to mitigate decoherence, it is critical to
minimize the duration of the circuit. We investigate the application of temporal planners to
the problem of compiling quantum circuits to newly emerging quantum hardware. While
our approach is general, we focus on compiling to superconducting hardware architectures
with nearest neighbor constraints. Our initial experiments focus on compiling Quantum
Alternating Operator Ansatz
(QAOA) circuits whose high number of commuting gates allow great flexibility in the
order in which the gates can be applied. That freedom makes it more challenging to find
optimal compilations but also means there is a greater potential win from more optimized
compilation than for less flexible circuits. We map this quantum circuit compilation
problem to a temporal planning problem, and generated a test suite of compilation problems
for QAOA circuits of various sizes to a realistic hardware architecture. We report
compilation results from several state-of-the-art temporal planners on this test set. This
early empirical evaluation demonstrates that temporal planning is a viable approach to
quantum circuit compilation.
1. Introduction
We explore the use of temporal planners to optimize compilation of quantum circuits to
newly emerging quantum hardware. Currently only special purpose quantum hardware is
commercially available: quantum annealers that run only one type of quantum optimization
algorithm. The emerging gate-model processors, currently in prototype phase, are universal
in that, once scaled up, they can run any quantum algorithm. This facilitates expanding the
empirical exploration of quantum algorithms beyond optimization, as well as enabling the
exploration of a broader array of quantum approaches to optimization.
Quantum algorithms are usually specified as idealized quantum circuits that do not
take into account hardware constraints. This approach makes sense since the actual
physical constraints vary from architecture to architecture. With the advent of gate-model
processors, researchers have begun to explore approached to compiling idealized quantum
circuits to realistic hardware. For example, emerging superconducting quantum processors
have planar architectures with nearest-neighbor restrictions on the locations (qubits) to
which the gates can be applied. Such processors include the 5-qubit processor IBM
recently made publicly available the cloud [IBM, 2017a], recently updated to 20 qubits,
and processors being fabricated by other groups, such as Intel/TU Delft [Versluis et al.,
2016], UC Berkeley [Ramasesh et al., 2017], Rigetti Computing [Sete et al., 2016] [Reagor
et al., 2017], and Google [Boxio, 2016]. All cited groups have announced plans to build
3
gate-model quantum processors with 40 or more qubits in the near term. Idealized circuits
generally do not respect nearest neighbor constraints; idealized quantum circuits generaly
contain many gates between pairs of qubits that are not nearest neighbors and therefor
cannot be implemented directly on the processors. - see Figure 2 for more details. For this
reason, compiling idealized quantum circuits to superconducting hardware requires adding
supplementary gates that move qubit states to locations where the desired gate can act on
them.
Quantum computational hardware suffers from decoherence, which degrades the
performance of quantum algorithms over time. Especially for near-term hardware, with
only limited means to mitigate decoherence, it is critical to minimize the duration of
(execution of) the circuit that carries out the quantum computation, so as to minimize
the decoherence experienced by the computation. Other, more sophisticated, compilation
cost functions, such as figure-of-merits taking into account fidelity of operations [Bishop
et al., 2017] [Moll et al., 2017], could be used in the future within the temporal planning
approach to compilation we explore here. Optimizing the duration of compiled circuits is
a challenging problem due to the parallel execution of gates with different durations. For
quantum circuits with flexibility in when the gates can be applied, or when some gates
commute with each other (so can be applied in a different order while still achieving
the same computation) the search space for feasible compilations is larger than for less
flexible circuits. That freedom makes it more challenging to find optimal compilations but
also means there is a greater potential win from more optimized compilation than for less
flexible circuits.
While there has been active development of software libraries that server as a software
toolchain to compile an algorithm (specified in some standardized language) into idealized
quantum circuits (see Ref. [Chong et al., 2017] for a review, and [Wecker and Svore,
2014] [Smith et al., 2016a] [Steiger et al., 2016a] [Devitt, 2016] [Barends et al., 2016]
for the most relevant works), few approaches have been explored for compiling idealized
quantum circuits to realistic quantum hardware [Beals et al., 2013] [Brierley, 2015]
[Bremner et al., 2016], leaving the problem open for innovation. Recent studies explore
exact schemes [Wille et al., 2014], approximate tailored methods [Kole et al., 2017] or
formulations suited for off-the-shelf Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP) solvers
such as Gurobi [Bhattacharjee and Chattopadhyay, 2017]. The benchmarks in prior work
have mostly revolved around circuits composed by elementary gates relevant for faulttolerant quantum computing schemes, with attention shifting recently in the quantum
computing community towards algorithms to be run on near-term hardware. These
algorithms have circuits that often contain a large number of mutually commuting gates,
4
but not necessarily natively available in the hardware. Recently a tailored scheduling
heuristic approach has been published by [Guerreschi and Park, 2016] to schedule quantum
circuits with many commuting gates (but only for gates of unity duration and/or on a
linear architecture.) Prior work had not used a temporal planning approach, which can
be applied quite generally, enabling us to address, for the first time, gates with variable
durations, generic architectures with inhomogeneous spatial features, and efficiencies that
can be gained when large numbers of gates commute. An similar issue arising when
compiling classical programs is the register allocation problem, in which program variables
are assigned to machine registers to improve execution time; this problem reduces to graph
coloring [Fu et al., 2005].
In this paper, we apply temporal planning techniques to the problem of compiling
quantum circuits to realistic gate-model quantum hardware. Temporal planning is a
subdomain of Automated Planning and Scheduling, a branch of Artificial Intelligence
(AI) which is concerned with the identification of strategic decisions, among a large finite
set of possibilities, to achieve a specific goal that includes temporal constraints or time
optimization objectives.
As we will explain in Section 4, we use domain-independent AI planners to find
a parallel sequence of conflict-free instructions that, when executed, achieve the same
result as the machine-independet quantum circuit. Additional instructions specific to a
gate-model architecture are inserted. The temporal planners aim to provide a machinedependent plan that minimizes makespan, while respecting all machine-dependent
constraints (e.g. available gates to perform swap operations, physical layout of the gates,
duration of gates, exclusions on simultaneous operations.) While our approach is general,
we focus our initial experiments on circuits that have few ordering constraints and thus
allow highly parallel plans. We report on experiments using a diverse set of temporal
planners to compile circuits of various sizes to an architecture inpired by those currently
being built. This early empirical evaluation demonstrates that temporal planning is a viable
approach to quantum circuit compilation.
In Sec. 2, we describe the problem of compiling idealized quantum circuits to specific
hardware architectures in detail. Sec. 3 describes QAOA circuits, the class of circuits with
many commuting gates that we target for our initial invstigation. Section 4 explains our
mapping of the quantum circuit compilation problem to temporal planning problem. Sec. 5
presents our results applying state-of-the-art temporal planners to this circuit compilation
problem. In Sec. 6, we outline future research directions stemming from this study. The aim
is to write the paper to communicate clearly to both the quantum computing community
and the temporal planning and artificial intelligence communities, so it will necessarily
5
contain some material that is review for one or the other group.
2. Architecture-specific quantum circuit compilation problem
Quantum circuits for general quantum algorithms are often described on an idealized
architecture in which any 2-qubit gate can act on any pair of qubits. Physical constraints
impose restrictions on which pairs of qubits support gate interactions in an actual physical
architecture. In this work, we concentrate on superconducting qubit architectures, using an
abstract model that takes into account gate durations and the nearest neighbor topology
of the quantum processors which will be used as the basis for the temporal planning
formulation of the compilation problem.
In general, the model will specify different types of abstract quantum gates,
each taking different durations, with a duration depending on the specific physical
implementation in terms of primitive gates. Gate-model quantum architectures operate as
digital computers with a clock, and times could be expressed in terms of clock cycles.
Elementary or primitive gates are the gates that have been directly implemlented in
the hardware and carefully calibrated, so are generally the fastest possible operations.
However, from a sequence of primitive gates, composite gates can be synthesized, making
it possible to describe a chip in terms of the relevant gates for the algorithm, as long as we
take into account the number of clock cycles that are required to perform the wanted gate.
In the model, qubits in a quantum processor can be thought of as nodes in a graph, and
the relevant 2-qubit quantum gates are associated to edges. In many architectures more than
one 2-qubit gate may be implementable between a given pair of qubits, so this structure is
a multigraph (multiple edges allowed between two nodes). In general the gates are nonsymmetric so the multi-graph could be directed (i.e. distinguishing the roles of two qubits),
as for instance is the case if we include the primitive (calibrated) gates in the IBM Quantum
Experience chip [IBM, 2017b].
Gates that operate on distinct sets of qubits may be able operate concurrently, though
there can be additional restrictions on which operations can be done in parallel, such as requiring the sets in operation to be non-adjacent, due to cross-talk and frequency-crowding,
as in Google’s proposed architecture [Boxio, 2016]).
The swap gate and its synthesis: In this study, we make extensive use of a particular type
of a 2-qubit gate, the swap gate, which exchanges the state of two qubits, though other
gate choices are possible. In order for the computation specified by the idealized circuit
to be completed, quantum information must be moved to locations where the desired gates
=
X−π/2
X−π/2
iSWAP
=
iSWAP
=
iSWAP
6
X−π/2
Figure 1. A known decomposition of the swap gate using as primitive gates three CNOTs or replacing recursively the C-NOTs with their synthesis in terms of iSWAPs and
X-rotations.
can be carried out, and a sequence of swap gates can be used to move the contents of two
distant qubits to a location where a desired gate can be executed. For this reason, the swap
gate is a useful gate for compilation in sparsely-connected architectures.
This origin of the “duration” abstraction for gates is exemplified in Figure 1(left) for
the swap gate, which can be efficiently decomposed in three control-NOT (CNOT) gates
[Schuch and Siewert, 2003]. The swap gate should last at least three times as long as the
CNOT gate [Vatan and Williams, 2004]. Figure 1(right) shows a possible synthesis of the
same swap in terms of only iSWAP gates, which are the primitives available everywhere
across the chip described in [Sete et al., 2016] .
Beside the timings dictated by logical gate synthesis, different choices of synchronization and time-scales of executions are possible, leading to different possible durations.
For instance, in [Caldwell et al., 2017] the controlled-Z gate (CZ) could last 175 or 270
nanoseconds depending on which choices are made at calibration. Across the chip, calibration might result in different gate times depending on the location in the chip even if the
underlying circuitry is the same, as shown in [IBM, 2017b], where the CNOT gate duration
could vary up to a factor of 2.
For the purposes of this study, we consider a simplified model in which swap gates
are available between any two adjacent qubits on the chip and all swap gates have the same
duration, but our temporal planning approach can handle the more general cases.
2.1. Formal problem statement
An idealized quantum circuit consists of a set of nodes (qubits), which can be thought of
as memory locations, and a specification of start times for operations (gates), each acting on a single node or set of nodes. The idealized quantum circuit also includes implicit
or explicit specification of which operations commute (the order in which they are exe-
7
cuted can be switched without affecting the computation) either individually or as blocks.
A hardware architecture specification can be viewed as a weighted, labeled multigraph
on a set of nodes, corresponding to physical quantum memory locations (qubits) in the
hardware, where each edge represents an operation (quantum gate) that can be physically
implemented on the pair of qubits in the physical hardware, possibly as a composite gate,
with the labels indicating the type of quantum gate and the weight giving its duration. The
output of the compilation process is a circuit that can be used to perform a quantum computation. It does not perform the computation itself, and therefore the compilation step can
be carried out on a conventional (non-quantum) computer. In this work, we are concerned
with the efficiency and effectiveness of the compilation. A separate issue, which we do not
consider here, is the performance of the quantum algorithms we are compiling.
Ideal to hardware-specific quantum circuit compilation problem: The problem input
is an idealized quantum circuit and a hardware multigraph. The output is a time-resolved
hardware-specific circuit that implements the quantum computation described by idealized
quantum circuit. The objective is to minimize the makespan (the circuit duration) of the
resulting schedule.
2.2. Compilation examples
Fig. 2 shows a hypothetical chip design that we will use for our experiments on circuit
compilation. It is inspired by the architecture proposed by Rigetti Computing Inc. [Sete
et al., 2016]. Qubits are labeled with ni and the colored edges indicate the types of 2-qubit
gates available (considering just those relevant for the algorithm), in this case swap gates
and two other types of 2-qubit gate (further described in Section 4). Given an idealized
circuit consisting only of the non-swap gates, used to define general quantum algorithms,
the circuit compilation problem is to find a new architecture-specific circuit by adding swap
gates when required, and reordering commuting operations when desired. The objective is
to minimize the overall duration to execute all gates in the new circuit. To illustrate the
challenges of finding effective compilation, we present some concrete examples, with reference to the 8-qubit section in the top left of Fig. 2.
Example 1: Suppose that at the beginning of the compilation, each qubit location ni
is associated to the qubit state qi . Let us also assume that the idealized circuit requires
the application of a red gate to the states q2 and q4 , initially located on qubits n2 and n4 .
One way to achieve this task would be to swap the state in n4 with n1 , while at the same
8
n2
n3
0000
n1
n4
n5
n6
n7
n8
Figure 2. Left: A schematic for the hypothetical chip design, based on an architecture
proposed by Rigetti Computing used in our numerical experiments. Available relevant
2-qubit gates are represented by colored arcs in a weighted multigraph. Each color is
associated to a specified, distinct gate-type and duration: SWAP gates (black) and two other
types of 2-qubits gates (red and blue). The 1-qubit gates are present at each qubit (black
dot). Right: Dashed boxes indicate the three different chip sizes used in our empirical
evaluation (see Sec. 5). For visual clarity, only the label locations and the SWAP-gates for
the smaller chip size, corresponding to the top-left sector of the largest chip, are shown.
time swapping n2 with n3 . Another swap, between n1 and n2 , positions q4 in n2 where a
red-gate connects it to q2 (which is now in n3 ).
The sequence of gates to achieve the stated goal are:
{SWAPn4 ,n1 , SWAPn2 ,n3 } →
≡
RED (q2 , q4 )
SWAP n1 ,n2
→
RED n2 ,n3
(1)
The first line refers to the sequence of gate applications, while the second corresponds to
the algorithm objective specification (a task defined over the qubit states). The sequence in
Eq. (1) takes 2τswap + τred clock cycles where τ? represents the duration of the ?-gate.
Example 2:
Consider an idealized circuit that requires BLUE(q1 , q2 ) ∧ RED(q4 , q2 ), in no particular
order. If τblue > 3 × τswap , the compiler might want to execute BLUEn1 ,n2 while the qubit
state q4 is swapped all the way clockwise in five SWAPs from n4 to n3 where REDn2 ,n3 can
be executed. However, if τblue < 3×τswap , it is preferable to wait until the end of BLUEn1 ,n2
9
and then start to executthe instruction sequence in Eq. (1).
3. Compiling QAOA for the MaxCut problem
While our approach can be used to compile arbitrary quantum circuits to a wide range of
architectures, in this paper we concentrate on one particular case: the class of Quantum
Alternating Operator Ansatz (QAOA) circuits [Farhi et al., 2014a, Hadfield et al., 2017]
for MaxCut (defined in the later part of this section) to the above-mentioned architecture
inspired to Rigetti Computing Inc. [Sete et al., 2016]. We choose to work with QAOA
circuits because they have many gates that commute with each other (i.e., no ordering
enforced). Such flexibility in the ordering of the gates means that the compilation search
space is larger than for other less flexible circuits. This makes finding the optimal
compilation more challenging, but also means there is potential for greater compilation
optimization, compared to other less flexible classes of circuits.
QAOA circuits have been the focus of recent research [Farhi et al., 2014a] [Farhi et al.,
2014b] [Farhi and Harrow, 2016] [Wecker et al., 2016] [Yang et al., 2016] [Guerreschi
and Smelyanski, 2017] [Jiang et al., 2017] [Wang et al., 2017] [Hadfield et al., 2017]
in the quantum computing community since their introduction by Farhi et al. in [Farhi
et al., 2014a]. The acronym was reworked from “quantum approximate optimization
algorithm” to “quantum alternating operator ansatz” in [Hadfield et al., 2017] since QAOA
circuits have been applied to exact optimization and sampling as well as to approximate
optimization and there are other quantum approaches to approximate optimization.
Recently Google Inc. proposed an alternative quantum approximate optimization
approach
in fixed nearest-neighbor architectures explicitly to avoid the compilation step that is
the subject of our work [Farhi et al., 2017]. Their numerical results on MaxCut instances
show a small hit in performance. Furthermore, unlike the QAOA circuits we consider
here, in which the number of parameters is independent of the number of qubits, their
alternative approach has many more parameters, which increase with the number of qubits,
and these parameters must be optimized separately for each architecture. While their
approach makes good use of near-term hardware with numbers of qubits for which the
parameter optimization is tractable, ultimately one wants a scalable algorithm that can be
compiled to arbitrary architectures. Thus, while interesting, especially in the very nearterm, rather than obviating the need, their work serves to underscore the need for efficient
approaches to optimize compilation.
10
q5
q1
PS1
MX
PS2
q6
q3
q4
q7
Figure 3. Example of a 6-vertex MaxCut problem on a randomly generated graph (qstates
q2 and q8 are not appearing in this instance). The association of quantum states to every
node allows the definition of the compilation objectives in terms of gates, as exemplified
on the right panel for QAOA p = 2. Colored edges refer to Figure 6.
We chose MaxCut as the target problem of reference, as it is becoming one of the
de facto benchmark standards for quantum optimization of all types and it is considered a
primary target for experimentation in the architecture of [Sete et al., 2016].
MaxCut Problem: Given a graph G(V, E) with n = |V | vertices and m = |E| edges.
The objective is to partition the graph vertices into two sets such that the number of edges
connecting vertices in different sets is maximized.
A quadratic boolean objective function for MaxCut is:
1 X
(1 − si sj ),
(2)
U=
2 (i,j)∈E
where si are binary variables, one for each vertex vi , with values +1 or -1 indicating to
which partition the vertex vi is assigned.
Idealized QAOA circuits alternate between a phase separation step (PS), based on the
objective function, and a mixing step. The phase-separation step for QAOA for MaxCut is
simpler than for other optimization problems, consisting of a set of identical 2-qubit gates
that must be applied between certain pairs of qubits depending on the graph of the MaxCut
instance under consideration. Specifically, the idealized QAOA circuit for MaxCut requires
a 2-qubit gate for each quadratic term in the objective function of Eq. (2), as well as 1-qubit
gates for each vertex for the mixing step [Farhi et al., 2014a].
11
In Fig. 3 a 6-vertex graph is shown, providing an illustrative instance that will be used
to describe the compilation procedure. We will refer to these as p-s gates, and the main
goal of the compilation is to carry them out.
The p-s gates all commute with each other, implying that they can be carried out in
any order without changing the computation.
In the mixing phase, a set of 1-qubit operations are applied, one to each qubit‡
All p-s gates that involve a specific qubit q must be carried out before the mixing
operator on q can be applied. These two steps are repeated p times. We consider p = 1 and
p = 2 in our experiments (detailed in Section 5).
For every vertex i ∈ V , QAOA for MaxCut requires a quantum state qi to be assigned
on a qubit on the chip, and for every edge (i, j) ∈ E, the PS step of QAOA requires
executing a gate corresponding to P - S(qi , qj ). We ignore the final mixing step since it is
trivial to compile by just applying the 1-qubit mixing gate to each qubit as the last operation.
We chose the architecture proposed by Rigetti Compuing in [Sete et al., 2016] (see
Fig. 2) for our initial exploration because it offers a particularly interesting compilation,
and therefore planning, problem, due to the existence of two different kinds of nearest
neighbor relation in the proposed hardware. After the synthesis of the QAOA MaxCut
gates, these two different relations become two different durations of two-qubit gates,
which corresponds to the red and blue edges as described above.
In our problem specification, while there are two flavors of p-s gates (red, blue),
corresponding to two different durations of execution, the compilation goals (see figure 3)
do not care on which of these two types of gates carries out the required steps. For the
purpose of this proof-of-concept work, these durations we assign to the gates are not
derived from actual designs of ongoing experiments, but are realistic and serve to illustrate
possible future designs.
The constraints on the compilation problem can be understood, with reference to
Fig. 2, as:
•
SWAP
gates are located at every edge with τswap = 2.
• there are two kind of non-swap gates: P - S gates are 2-qubit gates and
1-qubit gates.
•
MIX
gates are
gates are located at every edge of the grid, but their duration τp−s can be 3 or 4
depending on their location (respectively blue or red edges in Fig.2).
P-S
‡ This is another simple feature of MaxCut, and it is due to the fact that all possible 2N si variable
assignments (see Eq. 2) are defining a valid cut. If this wasn’t the case, then the mixing phase would also
likely require the application of 2-qubit gates, further complicating the scheduling problem.
12
•
MIX
gates are located at every vertex with τmix =1.
• In an initialization stage, which is not considered as part of the compilation problem,
a quantum state is assigned to each qubit.
4. Compilation of a Quantum Circuit as Temporal Planning Problem
Planning is the problem of finding a conflict-free set of actions and their respective
execution times that connects the initial-state I and the desired goal state G. We now
introduce some key concepts that provide the background for approaching the problem of
compiling quantum circuits as a temporal planning problem.
Classical planning problems are expressed in terms of binary state variables and
actions. Examples of state variables for our problem are “The quantum state Ψ is assigned
to qubit number X” and “The quantum state Φ has been transformed by the application of
gate G present on qubits X and Y ,” which may be True or False. Actions consist of two
lists, a set of preconditions and a set of effects.
The effects of an action consists of a subset of state variables with the values they take
on if the action is carried out. For example, the action “State Ψ is now moved from qubit
X to qubit Y ” has one precondition, “State Ψ is assigned to X = True” and has two effects
“State Ψ is assigned to X = False” and “State Ψ is assigned to Y = True.”
A specific planning problem specifies an initial state, with values specified for all state
variables, and a goal, specified values for one or more state variables. As for preconditions,
goals are conventionally positive, so the goal value for the goal variables is True. Generally,
the goal specifies values for only a small subset of the state variables. A plan is a sequence
of actions.
A valid plan, or a solution to the planning problem, is a sequence of actions A1 , ..., AL
such that the state at time step ti−1 meets the preconditions for action Ai , the effects of
action Ai are reflected in the state at time step ti , and the state at the end has all of the
goal variables set to True. For an introduction on Automated Planning and Scheduling, see
[Ghallab et al., 2004].
Planners: A planner is software implementing a collection of algorithms; it takes as input
a specification of domain and a problem description and returns a valid plan if one exists.
Many different approaches have been implemented to find a viable plan, among them: (i)
heuristically search over the possible valid plan trajectories or over the library of partial
plans or (ii) compile the planning problem into another combinatorial substrate (e.g., SAT,
MILP, CSP) and feed the problem to off-the-shelf solvers.
13
Planning Domain Description Language (PDDL): PDDL is a modeling language that was
originally created to standardize the input for planners competing in the International Planning Competition (IPC). Over time, it has become the de facto standard for modeling languages used by many domain-independent planners. We use PDDL 2.1, which allows the
modeling of temporal planning formulation in which every action a has duration da , starting time sa , and end time ea = sa + da . Action conditions cond(a) are required to be
satisfied either (i) instantaneously at sa or ea or (ii) required to be true starting at sa and
remain true until ea . Action effects eff (a) may instantaneously occur at either sa or ea .
Actions can execute when their temporally-constrained conditions are satisfied, and when
executed, will cause state-change effects. The most common objective function in temporal planning is to minimize the plan makespan, i.e. the shortest total plan execution time.
This objective matches well with the objective of our targeted quantum circuit compilation
problem. To enable reuse of key problem features present in an ensemble of similar instances, the PDDL model of a planning problem is separated into two major parts: (i) the
domain description that captures the common objects and behaviors shared by all problem
instances of this planning domain and (ii) the problem instance description that captures
the problem-specific objects, initial state, and goal setting for each particular problem.
PDDL is a flexible language that offers multiple alternatives for modeling a planning problem. These modeling choices greatly affect the performance of existing PDDL
planners. For instance, many planners pre-process the original domain description before
building plans; this process is time-consuming, and may produce large ‘ground’ models depending on how action templates were written. Also, not all planners can handle all PDDL
language features effectively (or even at all). For this project, we have iterated through different modeling choices with the objective of constructing a PDDL model that: (i) contains
a small number of objects and predicates for compact model size; (ii) uses action templates
with few parameters to reduce preprocessing effort; while (iii) ensuring that the model can
be handled by a wide range of existing PDDL temporal planners.
Modeling Quantum Gate Compilation in PDDL 2.1: To apply a temporal planner to the
circuit compilation problem, we must represent the allowed gates as actions and the desired
circuit as a set of goal variables. We describe how to do so for the QAOA circuit compilation problem exemplified in Fig. 3, ensuring that for a plan to be valid, the required P - S or
MIX gates are scheduled for each step of the algorithm. At the high-level, in this domain,
we need to model: (i) how actions representing P - S, SWAP, and MIX gates affect qubits and
14
(:constants q1 q2 q3 q4 q5 q6 q7 q8 - qstate)
(:durative-action swap 1 2
:parameters (?q1 - qstate ?q2 - qstate)
:duration (= ?duration 2)
:condition (and (at start (located at 1 ?q1))
(at start (located at 2 ?q2)))
:effect (and (at start (not (located at 1 ?q1)))
(at start (not (located at 2 ?q2)))
(at end (located at 1 ?q2))
(at end (located at 2 ?q1))))
(:durative-action mix q5 at 1
:parameters ( )
:duration (= ?duration 1)
:condition (and (at start (located at 1 q5))
(at start (GOAL PS1 q1 q5))
(at start (GOAL PS1 q5 q6))
(over all (not (mixed q5))))
:effect (and (at start (not (located at 1 q5)))
(at end (located at 1 q5))
(at end (mixed q5))))
(:durative-action P-S 2ndPhaseSeparation at 6-7
:parameters (?q1 - qstate ?q2 - qstate)
:duration (= ?duration 3)
(:durative-action P-S 1stPhaseSeparation at 6-7
:condition (and (at start (located at 6 ?q1))
:parameters (?q1 - qstate ?q2 - qstate)
:duration (= ?duration 3)
(at start (located at 7 ?q2))
:condition (and (at start (located at 6 ?q1))
(at start (not (GOAL PS2 ?q1 ?q2)))
(at start (located at 7 ?q2))
(at start (GOAL PS1 ?q1 ?q2))
(at start (not (GOAL PS1 ?q1 ?q2)))
(at start (mixed ?q1))
:effect (and (at start (not (located at 6 ?q1)))
(at start (mixed ?q2)))
(at start (not (located at 7 ?q2)))
:effect (and (at start (not (located at 6 ?q1)))
(at end (located at 6 ?q1))
(at start (not (located at 7 ?q2)))
(at end (located at 7 ?q2))
(at end (located at 6 ?q1))
(at end (GOAL PS1 ?q1 ?q2))
(at end (located at 7 ?q2))
(at end (GOAL PS1 ?q2 ?q1)))))
(at end (GOAL PS2 ?q1 ?q2))
(at end (GOAL PS2 ?q2 ?q1)))))
Figure 4. PDDL model of actions representing some exemple of SWAP, MIX, and P - S
gates. The first line indicates that this compilation problem involves 8 qubit states. For
each action, the duration indicates how long the action takes. The first action, a swap at
qubits 1 and 2, has as parameters the two qstates to swap. The condition checks that these
states are indeed located at the qubits on which the swap will occur. The effect makes sure
the states have been swapped. The second action mixes qstate q5 at qubit 1, with conditions
that state q5 is indeed at qubit 1, and both the phase separation gates involving qstate q5
(see Fig. 3) have been carried out. The effects include setting mixed q5 to TRUE The
third and fourth actions are phase separation actions in a p = 2 circuit corresponding to the
first and second levels of the algorithm.
15
qubit states (qstate); (ii) the actual qubits and qstates involved in a particular compilation
problem, with their initial locations and final goal requirements, (iii) the underlying graph
structure (gates connecting different pairs of qubits). We follow the conventional practice
of modeling (i) in the domain description while (ii) is captured in the problem description.
One common practice is to model (iii) within the problem file. However, given that we
target a rather sparse underlying qubit-connecting graph structure (see Fig. 2), we decide to
capture it within the domain file to ease the burden of the “grounding” and pre-processing
step for existing planners, which can be very time-consuming. Specifically:
Objects: We need to model three types of object: qubits, qstates, and the location of the P - S
and SWAP gates (i.e., edges in the multigraph of Fig. 2 connecting different qubits). Since
qstates are associated (by means of the predicate located at, see Fig. 4 for concrete example) to specific qubits, they have been modeled explicitly as planning objects, while the
qubits and the gate locations (i.e., edges) are modeled implicitly. It is clear from the action
definitions in Fig. 4 that qubit locations are embedded explicitly within the action declaration. This approach avoids declaring qubits as part of the action parameters, significantly
reducing the number of ground actions to be generated. For 2-qubit actions, the potential
number of ground actions reduces from N 4 to N 2 × |E|, with N the number of qubits
in the chip (up to 40) and E the set of connections between qubits. While it’s true that
many modern planners will be able to filter out invalid ground actions during the grounding/preprocessing step, our empirical evaluation shows that capturing the graph structure
explicitly in the domain file speeds up the preprocessing time of all tested planners, sometime as significantly as 40x.
Actions: Temporal planning actions are created to model: (i) 2-qubit SWAP gates, (ii)
2-qubit P - S gates, and (iii) 1-qubit MIX gates. For reference, Fig. 4 shows the PDDL
description of a SWAP gate between qubits 1 and 2, the MIX gate of state q5 on qubit 1,
and the P - S gates between qubits 6 and 7 at the first and second phase separation. § In the
action’s condition list, we specify that gates are accomplished on the two qstates only if they
are located on the corresponding qubits. Note that some planners (e.g., CPT, POPF) can not
handle action preconditions that are specified negatively (e.g., (overall(not(mixedq5))) of
action mix q5 at 1 in Figure 4). For those planners, we’ve also created another PDDL
version of our domain where dummy predicates such as not mixed is introduced to
represent the opposite value of those that need to be negatively satisfied in some action’s
§ The full set of PDDL model for all our tested problems is available at: https://ti.arc.nasa.gov/
m/groups/asr/planning-and-scheduling/VentCirComp17_data.zip
16
precondition list. To prevent a qstate q currently belonging to qubit X from being addressed
by multiple gates at the same time (i.e. “mutex” relations in planning terminology), we
assign value FALSE to the predicate (located at X q) at the starting time of all actions
involving q.
The most complex constraint to model is the conditions to mix a qstate q given the
requirement that all P - S gates involving q in the previous phase separation step have been
executed. We explored several other choices to model this requirement such as: (i) use a
metric variable P Scount(q) to model how many P - S gates involving q have been achieved
at a given moment; or (ii) use ADL quantification and conditional effect constructs supported in PDDL. Ultimately, we decided to explicitly model all P - S gates that need to be
achieved as conditions of the MIX(q) action. This is due to the fact that alternative options
require using more expressive features of PDDL2.1 which are not supported by many effective temporal planners.k
Objective: For a level p QAOA circuit, the goal is to have all of the (GOAL P Si ?q1 ?q2)
predicates, for any q1 and q2 connected in the graph, for 1 ≤ i ≤ p set to TRUE and all
mixedi qj set to true for 1 ≤ j ≤ N and 1 ≤ i ≤ p − 1 (since the final mixing step can be
added by hand at the end). Since we only consider p = 1 and p = 2, so only have a mixing
step in the p = 2 case, we have simplified the notation to simply mixed qj. Further, we use
the standard temporal planning objective of minimizing the plan makespan. Minimizing
the makespane coincides with minimizing the circuit depth, which is the main objective of
the compilation problem.
Alternative models: Given that non-temporal planners can perform much better than
temporal planners on problems of the same size, we also created the non-temporal
version of the domain by discretizing action durations into consecutive “time-steps”
ti , introducing additional predicates next(ti , ti+1 ) enforcing a link between consecutive
time-steps. However, initial evaluation of this approach with the M/Mp SAT-based
planner [Rintanen, 2012] (which optimize parallel planning steps) indicated that the
performance of non-temporal planners on this discretized (larger) model is much worse
than the performance of existing temporal planners on the original model.
k Only one of six planners in the Temporal track of the latest IPC (2014) supports numeric variables and also
only one of six supports quantified conditions. Preliminary tests with our PDDL model using metric variables
to track satisfied goals involving qstate q using several planners shows that they perform much worse than on
non-metric version, comparatively. This is to be expected as currently, state-of-the-art PDDL planners still
do not handle metric quantities as well as logical variables.
17
Another option is to totally ignore the temporal aspect and encode it as a “classical”
planning problem where actions are instantaneous. A post-processing step is then
introduced to inject back the temporal constraints and schedule actions in the found
classical plans. While we do not believe this approach would produce good quality plans,
it’s another promising option to scale up to larger problems in this domain.
5. Empirical Evaluation
We modeled the QAOA circuit compilation problem as described in the previous sections
and tested them using various off-the-shelf PDDL 2.1 Level 4 temporal planners. The results were collected on a RedHat Linux 2.4Ghz machine with 8GB RAM.
Problem generation: We consider three problem sizes based on grids with N = 8, 21 and
40 qubits (dashed boxes in Fig. 2). The utilized chip layouts are representative of devices
to come in the next 2 years¶
For each grid size, we generated two problem classes: (i) p = 1 (only one PS-mixing
step) and (ii) p = 2 (two PS-mixing steps). To generate the graphs G for which a MaxCut
needs to be found, for each grid size, we randomly generate 100 Erdös-Rényi graphs G
[Erdös and Rényi, 1960]. Half (50 problems) are generated by choosing N of N (N − 1)/2
edges over respectively 7, 18, 36 qstates randomly located on the circuit of size 8, 21, and
40 qubits (referred to herafter as ‘Utilization’ u=90%). The other half are generated by
choosing N edges over 8, 21, and 40 qstates, respectively (referred to herafter as ‘Utilization’ u=100%). In total, we report tests on 600 random planning problems with size in the
range [1024-232000] for the number of grounded actions and [192-8080] for the number
of predicates.
Planner setup: Since larger N and p lead to more complex setting with more predicates,
ground actions, requiring planners to find longer plans, the allocated cutoff time for
different setting are as follow: (i) 10 minutes per instance for N = 8, (ii) 30 minutes per
instance for P = 1, N = 21; (iii) 60 minutes per instance for other cases. The timelimits
are comparable to what used in the previous International Planning Competitions. We
select planners that performed well in the temporal planning track of previous IPCs, while
at the same time representing a diverse set of planning technologies:
¶ A gate-model 8-qubit chip with the grid we used is currently available from Rigetti, however the gate set
is currently uncalibrated or calibrated with different durations depending on the edges, so our benchmarks do
not model actual hardware.
18
• LPG: which is based on local search with restarts over action graphs [Gerevini et al.,
2003]. Specifically, LPG incrementally builds a multi-level graph structure. Each
layer represented by a single action and each graph edge represents a supporting
connection between one action’s effect with a condition of another action appearing
in a later layer. The graph leaf nodes represent action conditions that have not been
supported (i.e., “connected”) by other action effects. At the beginning of the search
process, LPG starts with a two-layer graph consisting of two newly created actions:
(i) Ainit : which occupies the first layer of the graph, has an empty condition list,
and has an effect list represents state variables that are true in the initial states; (ii)
Agoal : which occupies the last layer, has an empty effect list, and has a condition list
represents all goals. At each search step, LPG generates the local search neighborhood
by considering all decisions of either: (i) establishing a new edge connecting an
existing action’s effect with an open condition of another action appears in a later
layer (without conflicting with negative effects of other actions), (ii) removing an
edge from the existing graph; (iii) adding another action to the graph; (iv) removing
an action from the graph. Each resulting candidate partial (i.e., incomplete) plan in the
local search neighborhood is evaluated by a heuristic function balancing between how
close that candidate is from being a complete plan (i.e., fewer unsatisfied conditions)
and how good the quality of the likely complete plan starting from that candidate
partial plan based on the user’s defined objective function (e.g., minimizing the
plan makespan). LPG then selects the best candidate partial plan from the search
neighborhood and starts a new search episode. This process is repeated until a
complete plan is found. When LPG is run in the “anytime” mode, it does not stop
when the first complete plan is found, but will restart its planning process with the
found plan(s) used as the baseline quality comparison on the subsequent trials.
• Temporal FastDownward (TFD): a heuristic forward state-space (FSS) search planner
with post-processing to reduce makespan [Eyerich et al., 2009]. In the FSS framework,
the planner starts from the initial state I with an empty plan P and tries to extends P
until the state resulted from applying P satisfies all goals+ . In each search step, FSS
planners will generate new search nodes by taking a state SP = Apply(P, I), reached
from applying P to the initial state I, and considers all actions A applicable in SP (i.e.,
all conditions of A are satisfied by SP ). All newly generated states S 0 = Apply(A, SP )
are put in the search queue, ordered by the heuristically evaluated “quality” of S 0 . The
heuristic value evaluating a given state S generally depends on two factors: (i) the
+
This is in contrast to the backward state-space (BSS) planners, which build the plan “backward” starting
from the goals until it reaches the initial state.
19
quality of the partial plan leading from I to S, and (ii) the estimation on the quality of
the remaining plan leading from S to the goals. In TFD, the second part is estimated
through analyzing a set of special structure called the domain-transition graphs (DTG)
and causal-graph (CG) that are statically built for each planning problem∗ . After
a valid plan P is found, TFD also tries to improve the final plan makespan by
rescheduling actions in P , pushing them to start as early as possible without violating
the various logical and temporal constraints between different actions in P such as
causal supports and potential conflicts caused by actions’ negative effects. This postprocessing step is done greedily and takes little time compared to the planning process.
• SGPlan: partition the planning problem into subproblems that can be solved
separately, while resolving the inconsistencies between partial plans using extended
saddle-point condition [Wah and Chen, 2004] [Chen and Wah, 2006]. Specifically,
SGPlan uses a sub-goal partitioning strategy in which a high-level planning problem
is divided into smaller planning problems, each one targets a smaller subset of goals.
Furthermore, if a “landmark” (i.e., a given state or condition that needs to be visited
by all plans when solving a given problem) is found for a subset of the goals, that
landmark can be used to further partition a sub-planning problem into a subset of
secondary sub-problems. Thus, the original planning problem can be partitioned into a
hierarchy of multi-level interconnected smaller sub-problems, each with its own initial
state and set of goals. Each sub-problem can be solved by any off-the-shelf planner. In
particular, SGPlan uses a slightly modified Metric-FF, a forward state-space planner,
and an earlier version of LPG to solve sub-planning problems.
• CPT: uses the Partial Order Causal Link (POCL) framework, which once dominated
planning research. POCL planners search through the space of partial plans; each one
consists of a list of actions and the causal-link between them. A causal-link indicates
that an action’s effect is used to support another action’s condition. CPT [Vidal and
Geffner, 2006] utilizes techniques from constraint-programming to create (1) effective
branching scheme to select what action to consider next during each search step; (2) a
makespan-bound automatically extracted from the planning problem to set the horizon
for the solution search.
At the moment, CPT is one of the most effective temporal planners that can minimize
plan makespan.
∗ A directed edge in the DTG connects two values v and v 0 of a given state variable s in which there exist
an action a that can make the “transition” from v to v 0 by deleting v and add v 0 when executed. There is an
edge in CG connecting two DTGs associated with two state variables s and s0 if there is an action a that has
a condition depends on s and an effect causing change of the value of s0 .
20
Utilization u
LPG
TFD
SGPlan
POPF
CPT
P1
P2
N8
N21
N40
N8
N21
0.9 1.0 0.9 1.0 0.9 1.0 0.9 1.0 0.9 1.0
50 50 50 50 10 14 50 50 50 50
50 50 50 50
50 50 50 50
50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50
50 50 48 50
8
19 50 50
4
6
50 50
-
Table 1. Summary of the solving capability of selected planners. Numbers indicate how
many random problems out of 50 have been solved.
• POPF: is a forward-chaining planner that combines forward-state-space search
framework with ideas from the POCL planning framework. In POCL planning, a
new action is a threat to a causal link if it removes the condition the action introduces
in support of another action. During the forward search, when applying an action to a
state, POPF [Coles et al., 2010] seeks to introduce only the ordering constraints needed
to resolve threats, rather than insisting the new action occurs after all of those already
in the plan. POPF mostly uses the relaxed-plan heuristic similar to other forward statespace planners, but has a dedicated Simple Temporal Network (STN) implementation
to handle the temporal constraints incurred from temporal actions interleaving in the
explored partial plans. Besides temporal constraints, POPF can also handle linear
continuous numeric effects on resources. It does so by offloading those constraints to
a dedicated MILP solver.
We ran SGPlan (Ver 5.22), TFD (Ver IPC2014), POPF, and CPT (latest versions at
time of writing) with their default parameters. Unlike other planners, which support a single mode, LPG (Ver TD 1.0) has three standard modes, which we all ran to collect empirical
results: (i) -speed that uses heuristic geared toward finding a valid plan quickly, (ii) -quality
that uses heuristic balancing plan quality and search steps, and (iii) -n 10 (k = 10) that will
try to find within the time limit up to 10 plans of gradually better quality by using the
makespan of previously found plan as upper-bound when searching for a new plan. Since
LPG (k = 10) option always dominates both LPG-quality and LPG-speed by solving more
problems with better overall quality for all setting, we will exclude results for LPG-quality
and LPG-speed from our evaluation discussion. For the rest of this section, LPG result is
represented by LPG (k = 10).
21
Utilization u
LPG
TFD
SGPlan
POPF
p=1, N8
0.9
1.0
0.88 0.89
0.87 0.87
0.67 0.68
0.81 0.81
p=1, N21
0.9
1.0
0.91 0.87
0.95 0.90
0.64 0.67
0.90 0.94
p=2, N8
0.9 1.0
0.50 0.52
0.99 0.99
0.75 0.79
0.87 0.91
Table 2. Plan quality comparison between different planners using IPC formula (higher
value indicates better plan quality). Highlighted results represent the best performance
in the problem class. CPT results for N=8 p=1 are proven optimal so they are implicitly
assigned 1.0.
Evaluation Result Summary: Table 1 shows the overall performance on the ability to
find a plan of different planners. SGPlan stops after finding one valid plan while TFD,
LPG, and POPF are “anytime” planners that exhaust the allocated time limit and try to find
gradually improving quality plans. While CPT can find multiple plans, it does not return
any until it can prove that the plan found is optimal. Since no planner was able to find a
single solution for N = 40 and p = 2 within the 60 minute cutoff, we omit the result for
this case from Table 1. Overall, LPG was able to solve the highest number of problems,
followed by TFD, SGPlan, and POPF. Being an optimal-guarantee planner, CPT can only
solve the smallest problem set (N = 8, p = 1) and can not find any solution for the other
sets. SGPlan can find a solution very quickly, compared to the time it takes other three
other anytime planners to find the first solution. It is the only planner that can scale up and
solve all 100 problem in the N = 40 for p = 1 (finding plans with 150-220 actions). Unfortunately, SGPlan stopped with an internal error for N = 21 and p = 2. TFD generally spent
a lot of time on preprocessing for p = 1, N = 21 (around 15 minutes) and p = 2, N = 21
(around 30 minutes) but when it is finished with the pre-processing phase] it can find a
solution quickly and also can improve the solution quality quickly. TFD spent all of the
60 minutes time limit on pre-processing for N = 40 problems. LPG can generally find
the first solution more quickly than POPF and much faster than TFD (but still much more
slowly than SGPlan) but does not improve the solution quality as quickly as TFD or POPF.
Plan quality comparison: to compare the plan quality across planners, we use the formula
] The two most time-consuming parts in TFD’s pre-processing routine are “processing axioms” and
“invariant analysis”. While “processing axioms” are always consistently time-consuming, “invariant
analysis” is heuristically done and sometime can be quick while some other times can be very time
consuming.
22
■
45
35
30
25
20
makespan (CPT□ TFD■ LPG■ POPF■ SGPlan■)
15
10
10
■
■
■
■ ■
■ ■ ■
■ ■■■
■ ■
■ ■ ■■
■ ■
■■ ■
■■■ ■■■
■ ■
■■ ■■■
■■ ■ ■■
■ ■■■■
■■■■■■
■■■ ■ ■■
■■■■ ■
■■■
■■
■■■
□
■■
■■
■ ■■□
□□□■
□□□
■■■
■■
■■□□□
■□
■□□
□
■□
■□□□
■■□□ □
■□ □
□□□
□□ □ □
40
15
20
25
■
□
□
100
80
60
40
20
20
100
80
60
40
20
20
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■ ■
■
■
■
■
■
■ ■
■ ■
■ ■ ■
■■
■■■
■
■
■ ■■ ■ ■■
■ ■ ■ ■■ ■
■ ■■ ■ ■ ■■
■■ ■ ■■■■ ■■
□ ■ ■■■■■
■■ ■■
□■ □□
■■ ■■■□
■■
■
■■
□□■□
■ □
■ □□□
□□
■ □ □
■□
■□□ □
□
■ □□ □ □
□ □
□□
□
30
35
40
45
15
20
25
■
■
■
■■■
■
■■■
■
■■
□□□
■
□
■□□
□
30
■
■
■
■
■
■
□
□
35
□
■
■
■
□
40
45
15
■
■
■
■■
■
■
■ ■ ■ ■
■
■■ ■ ■
■
■ ■■■ ■■■
■
■ ■■■ ■■■■■■■ ■■■
■
■■ ■ ■ ■
■ ■■■
■
■ ■■ ■■■■ ■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■■■■■
■■■ ■■■■ ■■■ ■ ■
■■
■■■■ ■
■■
■■■ ■
■■■
■■■ ■
■
■
■■
60
80
makespan TFD
100
120
■
■■■
■■■■ ■
■■ ■■■ ■
■ ■■
■■■■■■■■■
■■
■■■ ■■
■■■
■■
■■■■■
■
■■ ■
■
■■
■■■
■■
■■ ■ ■
■
■■■■■■
■■
■■■
■
■■ ■
■
■■
■■■■■
■■■■ ■
■■■
■■■■
■■■
■■
■■■
■■■
■
■
■
■■■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■■ ■■
■
■
■
■ ■
■
■
60
80
makespan TFD
40
60
■
■
100
100
120
■
■
■ ■
■
■ ■■■ ■■
■
■■ ■ ■
■
■■■ ■■■■
■
■■
■
■
■
■■ ■
■
■■■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■
■■■
■ ■■■ ■
■■■
■ ■■ ■■■
■■
■■■ ■
■■
■
■
■
■
■■■ ■■■ ■
■ ■■
■■
■
■ ■ ■■
■■■■■ ■■
■■■ ■ ■
■
■
■ ■ ■■ ■ ■
■
■
■■
■
40
■■
■
■■
■■
■■■ ■
■
60
makespan LPG
25
30
35
40
15
45
■
■
■
■
80
■
■
■
100
60
80
makespan POPF
100
120
60
40
30
35
40
■
■
■
45
■
60
80
100
makespan SGPlan
■
■
■ ■ ■
■
■■■
■■
■
■
■
■
■
■ ■■■■ ■ ■
■■■ ■■ ■
■
■
■■
■■■■■■
■ ■■ ■
■■
■
■
■■■
■■■■■■■
■
■
■■■
■■ ■
■■
■■■
■■■■
■
■■■ ■■■
■
■■■
■ ■
■■
■■■■ ■
■■■ ■
■ ■■■
■
■■
■
■■■
■
■
■ ■
■
■■
■■■■■
■
■
■■■■■■
■ ■■
■
■■■■■■
40
25
■
□
■
■■
■
■■
■ ■■
■ ■ ■■■■ ■
■
■■■■■ ■■ ■
■ ■
■■ ■■■ ■■
■
■■■ ■■ ■■
■
■ ■
■■ ■ ■
■ ■■■
■
■ ■■■■ ■ ■■ ■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■■ ■■■■
■■
■■
■■
■■ ■
■■
■■■■■■
■■■■■■■ ■■
■■■■■■■■■■■
■
■
■ ■ ■
■■
■ ■
■ ■■■ ■■
■■ ■
■
■
■
■■■■
■
■■ ■■■ ■■
■ ■■■■ ■■■■
■ ■■■■ ■
■■ ■ ■■■
■ ■■■
■■■ ■■■
■ ■■■ ■
■■
■■■■■■
■
■■■■■
■■
■■■■
■■■■■■■
■
■
■
■■■
■ ■■
■
■
■
■■■ ■
40
20
■
makespan SGPlan
■
■
■
■
■
80
makespan LPG
■
■
■
40
■
■
■
■
40
20
■
■
■
■■■
■■
■■
■
■ ■ ■ ■
■
■■
■ ■
■ ■■■■■■ ■■■ ■
■■■ ■■■ ■■ ■■■
■■■ ■■■■■
■ ■
■ ■■■ ■■■ ■■■
□■
■ ■■■ ■■■□
■ ■
□□
□□ ■□ □
□
■ ■■■ ■□
■
■■
■
□ □
■■
■
■□■ ■
■□ □□□□
■
□
□■□ □■
□□ □
■■
■□ □ □
□
□
■□□□
■□
□
□
□
■
□
■
■
■
■
■ ■
■
■
■
■
■■
■
□
makespan POPF
■
■■■ ■
■ ■■■
■■
■■■
■■
■
■■■ ■■
■ ■■■■■■ ■ ■
■■ ■■■■■
■
■■■■■
■■■
■■
■■
■■■■
■■■■■■
■■■
■■
■■■
■ ■■
■■
■■
■■■■
■
■
■
■■
■■■■■■
■■■■■
■■■■■
■■■■
■
■
■
■
■
■■
■ ■
■
■■■
■■
■ ■■
■■ ■
■■
■ ■ ■
■ ■■■■■ ■
■ ■ ■■■
■■■ ■
■ ■ ■■■
■■ ■■■■■
■■■
■ ■■■■■
■ ■■
■■■ ■■■
■■ ■■■■
■
■■■□
■ ■ □
□
□
■□
■■□
■□■□□
■ ■
□
■■■□
■■
■ □
■□□ □
□□
□□
□□
■■
■■
■■
□ □□ □
■□
■□
□ □
□□□
makespan LPG
makespan TFD
120
■
■
■
■
120
■
■■
■ ■
■■
■
■
■ ■■ ■ ■ ■
■
■■■ ■■■■ ■■■
■
■
■ ■
■■ ■■
■ ■■■■ ■■
■ ■ ■■■■■■
■■■■■
■■■■■■■
■ ■ ■■
■■■
■■■■
■
■■
■
■■■■■■■■
■■
■■
■■
■■■
■■
■ ■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■ ■■ ■■■■■■■■
■■■■
■ ■■ ■
■
■■■ ■■
■■ ■ ■
■
■
■
80
makespan POPF
100
40
60
80
100
makespan SGPlan
Figure 5. Instance-by-instance makespan comparison of the used planners on the problem
set for u=1.0 (results for u=0.9 are qualitatively similar). Scatterplots indicate on the xaxis a specific planner, compared on the y axis against another planner (color code in the
legend). The dashed line indicate equal makespan. The first row of plots shows N =8, p=1;
the second row N =8, p=2; the third row N =21, p=1.
employed by the IPCs to grade planners in the temporal planning track since IPC6 [Helmert
et al., 2008]: for each planning instance i, if the best-known makespan is produced by a
plan Pi , then for a given planner X that returns a plan PXi for i, the score of PXi is calculated
as: makespan(Pi ) divided by makespan(PXi ). A comparative value closer to 1.0 indicates
that planner X produces better quality plan for instance i. We use this formula and average
the score for our three tested planners over the instance ensembles that are completely
23
solved by the time cutoff. Table 2 shows the performance of different planners with regard
to plan quality. For N = 8 and p = 1, for which we know the optimal plans given that
CPT was able to solve all 100 problems, LPG found the best quality plans but TFD is only
slightly worse and POPF is not far behind.
The comparison results for N = 21 and p = 1 is similar in the sense that the three
anytime planners LPG, TFD, and POPF perform very similarly but in this case TFD and
POPF are slightly better than LPG. For N = 8 and p = 2, TFD nearly always produce the
best quality plan with POPF slightly behind while LPG perform significantly worse. The
mixing and the requirement to synchronize the two phase-separation seems to confuse the
local search heuristic in LPG. SGPlan, which unlike TFD, LPG, POPF only find a single
solution, produce lower quality plans, as expected. However, for the p = 2 case, SGPlan
produces overall better quality plans compared to LPG, even though LPG returns multiple
plans for each instance.
Fig. 5 shows in further detail the head-to-head makespan comparison between
different pairs of planners, specifically pairwise comparisons between TFD, SGPLan, LPG,
and POPF: TFD always dominates SGPlan, TFD dominates LPG majority of the times
(except for N = 8, p = 1 where the performances are comparable), and SGPlan dominates
LPG on bigger problems, but is slightly worse on smaller problems. POPF performance in
general is very similar with the one of TDF, especially for N = 8.
For a more detailed analysis with data reported for each specific instance, see [NASA,
2017].
Planning time comparison: Both TFD, LPG, and POPF use “anytime” search algorithms
and use all of their allocated time to try finding better gradually better quality plans. In contrast, SGPlan return a single solution and thus generally take a very short amount of time
with the median solving time for SGPlan in p=1|N8 , p=1|N21 , P =1|N40 and P =2|N8 are
0.02, 1, 25, and 0.05 seconds††. CPT, in general, set a very tight upper-bound on makespan
before trying to find a plan within the bound and prove that the solution is optimal. For the
smallest problem set when it can solve all 100 instances, it took a very short time between
1 to 2 seconds to find and prove optimality. However, for any other bigger set, its tight
upper bounds proven to be ineffective in finding a single solution.
Other planners: We have also conducted tests on: VHPOP, HSP*, and YASPH. While
LPG, SGPlan, TFD, and POPF were selected for their ability to solve large planning prob†† For comparison purpose, LPG-quality, which also try to returns a single solution of good quality, produces
the median solving time for P =1|N8 and P =2|N8 are 0.9 and 70 seconds respectively.
24
lems, we hoped that HSP* and VHPOP would return optimal plans to complement CPT in
providing a baseline for plan quality estimation. Unfortunately, HSP* and VHPOP failed
to find a single plan even for our smallest problems for various reason: VHPOP ran out
of memory quickly, while HSP* couldn’t find any plan for a cutoff time of 2 hours. We
have preliminary acceptable results with YAHSP up to N=40 but they will be discussed in
a future work.
Discussion: Our preliminary empirical evaluation shows that the test planners provide a
range of tradeoffs between scalability and plan quality. At one end, SGPlan can scale up to
large problem sizes and solve them in a short amount of time, providing reasonably good
quality plans (compared to the best known solutions). At the other end, TFD utilizes all
of the allocated time to find the best quality solutions but in general is the slowest by far
to obtain a valid solution. LPG and POPF balance between the two: they can either find
one solution quickly like SGPlan or can utilize the whole time prior to cutoff to find better
quality solutions.
Since planning is exponentially hard with regard to the problem size (i.e., number
of state variables and actions), being able to partition it into sub-problems of smaller
sizes definitely helps SGPlan to be find a valid solution quickly. However, there are
several reasons that TFD, LPG, and POPF can find overall better quality solutions: (i)
their anytime algorithms allow them to gradually find better quality plans, using the
previously found plans as baseline for pruning unpromising search directions; (ii) SGP’s
partitioning algorithm is based on logical relationship between state variables and actions
and ignores all temporal aspects. Thus, combining plans for sub-problems using logical
global constraints can lead to plans of lower quality for time-sensitive objective function
such as minimizing the plan makespan.
Fig. 6 shows a visualization of plans in a ‘Gantt chart’ format, putting the planners in
comparison for a single N =8 instance from Fig. 3. To illustrate the representation, we can
look at the shown p=2 case: consider the, qstate q1 initially located at n1 . The first gate it
is involved in is the phase separation gate shown in green between qstates q1 and q4. The
second gate is a phase separation gate between qubits 1 and 2 which contain qstates q1 and
q3 respectively, because states q2 and q3 were swapped in the previous step. State q1 is
then swapped with the state in qubit 2, prior to being involved in another phase separation
gate, between the contents of qubits 2 and 3, this time with state q5 that was swapped into
qubit 3 during time steps 3 − 4. It is then mixed while still located at qubit 2. Continuing to
read through the chart in this way, we see that qstate q1 undergoes the following sequence
25
n1
n2
n3
n4
n5
n6
n7
n8
n1
n2
n3
n4
n5
n6
n7
n8
n1
n2
n3
n4
n5
n6
n7
n8
n1
n2
n3
n4
n5
n6
n7
n8
POPF
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
n1
n2
n3
n4
n5
n6
n7
n8
■
■
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
SGPlan
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
LPG
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
■
■
■
■
■
■
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
TFD
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
n1
n2
n3
n4
n5
n6
n7
n8
■
■
■
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
TFD p=2
■
■
■
■
■
■
+
■
■
1
■
3
■
■
5
■
4
■
■
CPT
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
■
7
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
+
■
+
■
+
■
+
■
■
■
+
+
■
■
■
■
+
+
+
■
■
■
■
■ 6 ■
■
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35
Figure 6. The Gantt charts show compilations, labeled for each planner of the QAOA for
the MaxCut instance depicted in Fig. 3 on the N=8 processor in Fig. 2. Schedules have time
on the x-axis and qubit locations on the y-axis. Each row indicates what gate operates on
each qubit at a given time during the plan (Colored blocks represents p-s gates, of duration
3 or 4 depending on their location, with synchronized pair colors associated to edges in
Fig. 3 and white blocks are swap gates). The last schedule shows a compilation of p = 2
performed by TFD. Black blocks with numbers are mix gates acting on the corresponding
state. Gates marked with a + indicate superfluous gates that were inserted in the plan by
TFD, that could be detected and eliminated in post-processing.
26
of actions:
P - S 3 (q1 , q4 )
→ P - S3 (q1 , q3 ) → P - S4 (q1 , q5 ) →
→
→ P - S4 (q1 , q5 ) →
WAIT(4)
→ P - S3 (q1 , q3) →
WAIT(3)
MIX (q1 )
WAIT (2)
→ P - S3 (q1 , q4 )
where we denote the duration of the P - S gates in subscript and we introduced an WAIT gate
to indicate inaction times. The second mixing phase is trivially scheduled at the end of the
last tasks for each qstate.
In the shown case, TFD has found an optimal solution (same makespan as CPT).
Based on an “eye-test” and manual analysis, the best plans returned are usually of
good quality but not without defects. Note also that the plan found by TFD for p=2 is also
worse than the one that would be trivially obtained by replicating the optimal makespan
p=1 solution twice (the second time in reverse). The displayed output also contains some
unnecessary gates. Examples are the repeated swaps at time 11 and 30, and the mixing
of the un-utilized logical states q2 and q8 at times 1,5. These spurious gates/actions do
not affect the makespan, and they can be identified and eliminated by known plan postprocessing techniques [Do and Kambhampati, 2003]. We also believe a tighter PDDL
model will help eliminate extra gates.
6. Conclusion and Future Work
In this paper we presented a novel approach to the problem of compiling idealized quantum
circuits to specific quantum hardware, focusing our experiments on QAOA circuits. Our
presentation and tests have been focused on the pedagogical and practically relevant
example of MaxCut, but the approach is sufficiently general to be applied to QAOA circuits
for any discrete optimization problem, and to arbitrary quantum circuits more generally.
Because QAOA has so many commuting gates, we expect to obtain a bigger win for this
sort of algorithm than typical quantum algorithms. For most circuits, however, the problem
of determining which swaps to make when to ensure that the qstates are next each other
in order to carry out the desired gate sequence is highly non-trivial. Many swaps can be
done in parallel, and ideally would place qstates in such a way that multiple gates can be
carried out before having to swap again, or more generally in a way so as to minimize the
run time of the circuit. For these reasons, we expect the temporal planning approach to
enable significant gains over a brute force for circuits generally.
A handful of well-established temporal planners were able to compile the QAOA
circuits with reasonable efficiency, demonstrating the viability of this approach. We plan
27
to expand the portfolio of plannes we have tested, keeping up with latest AI planning
technology; the data used in our tests, as well as the PDDL models, will be made available
online at [NASA, 2017].
One thing that will be expanded in our analysis is the assessment of the quality
of the best plans found compared to optimal solutions. At the moment, there is no
published work on finding optimal solution for this problem and, as outlined in the
previous section, our current effort to get existing optimal-makespan planners to find
solutions has been successful only for N = 8, p = 1. Another important direction is to
support circuit optimization beyond the makespan objective: for instance there is currently
tremendous interest in the definition of figure-of-merits that could quantify the power of
near-term quantum devices to execute experiment of interests (i.e. quantum supremacy
experiments) [Bishop et al., 2017].
This work paves the way for future work on the use of AI planning methods for
quantum circuit compilation and design. In future work, we plan to further tune the
performance of the planners, including choosing an initial assignment of qstates to qubits
favorable for compilation, instead of using a random assignment. In order to scale reliably
to QAOA circuits with more levels and therefore larger plan sizes, we will develop
decomposition approaches in which p ¿ 1 could be divided into multiple p = 1 problems to
be solved independently and matched in a postprocessing phase. Initial results show that
the advantage of not decomposing the problem amounts to approximately 10% of reduction
of the makespan on average, and more than half of the test instances can be scheduled
optimally by focusing on the p = 1 problem.
We will also compare with other approaches to this compilation problem such as
sorting networks [Beals et al., 2013] [Brierley, 2015] [Bremner et al., 2016], constraint
programming (CP), or tailored scheduling heuristics [Guerreschi and Park, 2016] and
develop more advanced hybrid compilation methods building on the various strengths
of the temporal planning approaches and of other approaches. Once mature we will
integrate compilation with other software supporting experimentation with various nearterm processors. A virtue of the planning approach is that the temporal planning framework
is very flexible with respect to features of the hardware, including irregular graph structures
and diverse gate durations.
In the future, we can include in the PDDL modeling additional features that are
characteristics of quantum computer architectures, such as the crosstalk effects of 2-qubit
gates, realistic durations from optimal 2-qubit gate synthesis that could allow P - S and
SWAP gates to be performed as a single gate, or the ability to quantum teleport quantum
states across the chip [Copsey et al., 2003], and features of broad classes of quantum
28
algorithms including measurement and feedback, error correction, and fault tolerant gate
implementations. As hardware graphs, primitive gate sets, and gate durations for processors
build by experimental groups become available, we will apply this temporal planning
approach with these hardware parameters as input. Conversely, results from future work
comparing results of compilation to different potential architectures may suggest hardware
designs that take into account the ability to support efficient compiled circuits.
We will also consider other families of quantum circuits, including QAOA circuits
applied to problems beyond MaxCut [Hadfield et al., 2017], and to more typical quantum
circuits, with fewer pairwise commuting gates, but for which it remains difficult to fine
an optimal sequence of swap and goal gates. This temporal planning approach to quantum
circuit compilation should be of great interest to the community developing low-level quantum compilers for generic architectures [Steiger et al., 2016b] [Häner et al., 2016] and to
designers of machine-instructions languages for quantum computing [Smith et al., 2016b]
[Cross et al., 2017].
7. Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge useful discussions with Will Zeng, Robert Smith, and Bryan
O’Gorman. The authors appreciate support from the NASA Advanced Exploration Systems program and NASA Ames Research Center (Sponsor Award No. NNX12AK33A and
contract No. NNA16BD14C). The views and conclusions contained herein are those of the
authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies or endorsements, either expressed or implied, of the U.S. Government. The U.S. Government is
authorized to reproduce and distribute reprints for Governmental purpose notwithstanding
any copyright annotation thereon.
[Barends et al., 2016] Barends, R., Shabani, A., Lamata, L., Kelly, J., Mezzacapo, A., Heras, U. L., Babbush,
R., Fowler, A. G., Campbell, B., Chen, Y., et al. (2016). Digitized adiabatic quantum computing with a
superconducting circuit. Nature, 534(7606):222–226.
[Beals et al., 2013] Beals, R., Brierley, S., Gray, O., Harrow, A. W., Kutin, S., Linden, N., Shepherd, D.,
and Stather, M. (2013). Efficient distributed quantum computing. Proceedings of the Royal Society A.,
469(2153):767 – 790.
[Bhattacharjee and Chattopadhyay, 2017] Bhattacharjee, D. and Chattopadhyay, A. (2017). Depth-optimal
quantum circuit placement for arbitrary topologies. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.08540.
[Bishop et al., 2017] Bishop, L., Bravyi, S., Cross, A., Gambetta, J., and Smolin, J. (2017). Quantum
volume. https://ibm.biz/BdiaQe.
29
[Boxio, 2016] Boxio, S. (2016). Characterizing quantum supremacy in near-term devices. In arXiv preprint
arXiv:1608.0026.
[Bremner et al., 2016] Bremner, M. J., Montanaro, A., and Shepherd, D. J. (2016). Achieving quantum
supremacy with sparse and noisy commuting quantum computations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.01808.
[Brierley, 2015] Brierley, S. (2015). Efficient implementation of quantum circuits with limited qubit
interactions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1507.04263.
[Caldwell et al., 2017] Caldwell, S., Didier, N., Ryan, C., Sete, E., Hudson, A., Karalekas, P., Manenti, R.,
Reagor, M., da Silva, M., Sinclair, R., et al. (2017). Parametrically-activated entangling gates using
transmon qubits. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.06562.
[Chen and Wah, 2006] Chen, Y. and Wah, B. (2006). Temporal planning using subgoal partitioning and
resolution in sg-plan. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 26:323 – 369.
[Chong et al., 2017] Chong, F. T., Franklin, D., and Martonosi, M. (2017). Programming languages and
compiler design for realistic quantum hardware. Nature, 549(7671):180–187.
[Coles et al., 2010] Coles, A. J., Coles, A. I., Fox, M., and Long, D. (2010). Forward-chaining partialorder planning. In Proceedings of the Twentieth International Conference on Automated Planning and
Scheduling (ICAPS-10).
[Copsey et al., 2003] Copsey, D., Oskin, M., Impens, F., Metodiev, T., Cross, A., Chong, F. T., Chuang, I. L.,
and Kubiatowicz, J. (2003). Toward a scalable, silicon-based quantum computing architecture. IEEE
Journal of selected topics in quantum electronics, 9(6):1552–1569.
[Cross et al., 2017] Cross, A. W., Bishop, L. S., Smolin, J. A., and Gambetta, J. M. (2017). Open quantum
assembly language. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.03429.
[Devitt, 2016] Devitt, S. J. (2016). Performing quantum computing experiments in the cloud. Physical
Review A, 94(3):222–226.
[Do and Kambhampati, 2003] Do, M. B. and Kambhampati, S. (2003). Improving the temporal flexibility
of position constrained metric temporal plans. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on
Artificial Intelligence Planning and Scheduling (ICAPS).
[Erdös and Rényi, 1960] Erdös, P. and Rényi, A. (1960). On the evolution of random graphs. Publications
of the Mathematical Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, 5:569–573.
[Eyerich et al., 2009] Eyerich, P., Mattmüller, R., and Röger, G. (2009). Using the context-enhanced additive
heuristic for temporal and numeric planning. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on
Automated Planning and Scheduling, pages 318 – 325.
[Farhi et al., 2014a] Farhi, E., Goldstone, J., and Gutmann., S. (2014a). A quantum approximate
optimization algorithm. In arXiv preprint arXiv:1411.4028.
[Farhi et al., 2014b] Farhi, E., Goldstone, J., and Gutmann., S. (2014b). A Quantum Approximate
Optimization Algorithm Applied to a Bounded Occurrence Constraint Problem. In arXiv preprint
axXiv:1412.6062.
[Farhi et al., 2017] Farhi, E., Goldstone, J., Gutmann, S., and Neven, H. (2017). Quantum algorithms for
fixed qubit architectures. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.06199.
[Farhi and Harrow, 2016] Farhi, E. and Harrow, A. W. (2016). Quantum supremacy through the quantum
approximate optimization algorithm. In arXiv preprint arXiv:1602.07674.
[Fu et al., 2005] Fu, C., Wilken, K., and Goodwin, D. (2005). A faster optimal register allocator. The
Journal of Instruction-Level Parallelism, 7:1 – 31.
[Gerevini et al., 2003] Gerevini, A., Saetti, L., and Serina, I. (2003). Planning through stochastic local search
and temporal action graphs. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 20:239 – 290.
30
[Ghallab et al., 2004] Ghallab, M., Nau, D., and Traverso, P. (2004). Automated Planning: theory and
practice. Elsevier.
[Guerreschi and Smelyanski, 2017] Guerreschi, G. and Smelyanski, M. (2017). Practical optimization for
hybrid quantum-classical algorithms. In arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.01450.
[Guerreschi and Park, 2016] Guerreschi, G. G. and Park, J. (2016). Gate scheduling for quantum algorithms.
arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.08208.
[Hadfield et al., 2017] Hadfield, S., Wang, Z., O’Gorman, B., Rieffel, E. G., Venturelli, D., and Biswas, R.
(2017). From the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm to a Quantum Alternating Operator
Ansatz. ArXiv e-prints.
[Häner et al., 2016] Häner, T., Steiger, D. S., Svore, K., and Troyer, M. (2016). A software methodology for
compiling quantum programs. arXiv preprint arXiv:1604.01401.
[Helmert et al., 2008] Helmert, M., Do, M., and Refanidis, I. (2008). The 2008 international
planning competition: Deterministic track. http://icaps-conference.org/ipc2008/
deterministic/. 2008-02-19.
[IBM, 2017a] IBM (2017a). The ibm quantum experience. http://www.research.ibm.com/
quantum/. 2017-02-19.
[IBM, 2017b] IBM (2017b). Ibm quantum experience ibmqx3 backend specifications. https:
//github.com/QISKit/ibmqx-backend-information/tree/master/backends/
ibmqx3.
[Jiang et al., 2017] Jiang, Z., Rieffel, E., and Wang, Z. (2017). A qaoa-inspired circuit for grover’s
unstructured search using a transverse field. In arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.0257.
[Kole et al., 2017] Kole, A., Datta, K., and Sengupta, I. (2017). A new heuristic for n-dimensional nearest
neighbor realization of a quantum circuit. IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated
Circuits and Systems.
[Moll et al., 2017] Moll, N., Barkoutsos, P., Bishop, L. S., Chow, J. M., Cross, A., Egger, D. J., Filipp, S.,
Fuhrer, A., Gambetta, J. M., Ganzhorn, M., Kandala, A., Mezzacapo, A., Müller, P., Riess, W., Salis, G.,
Smolin, J., Tavernelli, I., and Temme, K. (2017). Quantum optimization using variational algorithms
on near-term quantum devices. ArXiv e-prints.
[NASA, 2017] NASA (2017). Repository with complementary materials for the reproduction of the
tests of the paper (pddl files and instances). https://ti.arc.nasa.gov/m/groups/asr/
planning-and-scheduling/VentirComp17_data.zip.
[Ramasesh et al., 2017] Ramasesh, V., O’Brien, K., Dove, A., Kreikebaum, J. M., Colless, J., and Siddiqi, I.
(2017). Design and characterization of a multi-qubit circuit for quantum simulations. In March Meeting
2017. American Physical Society.
[Reagor et al., 2017] Reagor, M., Osborn, C., Tezak, N., Staley, A., Prawiroatmodjo, G., Scheer, M.,
Alidoust, N., Sete, E., Didier, N., da Silva, M., et al. (2017). Demonstration of universal parametric
entangling gates on a multi-qubit lattice. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.06570.
[Rintanen, 2012] Rintanen, J. (2012). Planning as satisfiability: Heuristics. Artificial Intelligence, 193:45 –
86.
[Schuch and Siewert, 2003] Schuch, N. and Siewert, J. (2003). Natural two-qubit gate for quantum
computation using the xy interaction. Physical Review A, 67(3):032301.
[Sete et al., 2016] Sete, E. A., Zeng, W. J., and Rigetti, C. T. (2016). A functional architecture for scalable
quantum computing. In , IEEE International Conference on Rebooting Computing (ICRC).
[Smith et al., 2016a] Smith, R. S., Curtis, M. J., and Zeng, W. J. (2016a). A practical quantum instruction
31
set architecture. In arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.03355.
[Smith et al., 2016b] Smith, R. S., Curtis, M. J., and Zeng, W. J. (2016b). A practical quantum instruction
set architecture. arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.03355.
[Steiger et al., 2016a] Steiger, D. S., Häner, T., and Troyer, M. (2016a). Projectq: An open source software
framework for quantum computing. In arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.08091.
[Steiger et al., 2016b] Steiger, D. S., Häner, T., and Troyer, M. (2016b). Projectq: An open source software
framework for quantum computing. arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.08091.
[Vatan and Williams, 2004] Vatan, F. and Williams, C. (2004). Optimal quantum circuits for general twoqubit gates. Phys. Rev. A, 69:032315.
[Versluis et al., 2016] Versluis, R., Poletto, S., Khammassi, N., Haider, N., Michalak, D., Bruno, A., Bertels,
K., and DiCarlo, L. (2016). Scalable quantum circuit and control for a superconducting surface code.
arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.08208.
[Vidal and Geffner, 2006] Vidal, V. and Geffner, H. (2006). Branching and pruning: An optimal temporal
pocl planner based on constraint programming. Artificial Intelligence Journal, 170(3):298335.
[Wah and Chen, 2004] Wah, B. and Chen, Y. (2004). Subgoal partitioning and global search for solving
temporal planning problems in mixed space. International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools,
13(4):767 – 790.
[Wang et al., 2017] Wang, Z., Hadfield, S., Jiang, Z., and Rieffel, E. G. (2017). The Quantum
Approximation Optimization Algorithm for MaxCut: A Fermionic View. arXiv:1706.02998.
[Wecker et al., 2016] Wecker, D., Hastings, M. B., and Troyer, M. (2016). Training a quantum optimizer. In
arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.05370.
[Wecker and Svore, 2014] Wecker, D. and Svore, K. M. (2014). Liqui|>: A software design architecture
and domain-specific language for quantum computing. In arXiv preprint arXiv:1402.4467.
[Wille et al., 2014] Wille, R., Lye, A., and Drechsler, R. (2014). Exact reordering of circuit lines for nearest
neighbor quantum architectures. IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits
and Systems, 33(12):1818–1831.
[Yang et al., 2016] Yang, Z. C., Rahmani, A., Shabani, A., Neven, H., and Chamon, C. (2016).
Optimizing variational quantum algorithms using pontryagin’s minimum principle. In arXiv preprint
arXiv:1607.06473.
| 3cs.SY
|
The Secret Sharer:
Measuring Unintended Neural Network Memorization & Extracting Secrets
arXiv:1802.08232v1 [cs.LG] 22 Feb 2018
Nicholas Carlini
University of California, Berkeley
Jernej Kos
National University of Singapore
Chang Liu
University of California, Berkeley
Úlfar Erlingsson
Google Brain
Abstract
In the machine-learning domain, such unintended
sharing of secrets is a real-world concern of pressing importance. Machine learning is seeing rapid adoption and
it is increasingly common for models to be trained on
data very likely to contain secrets, such as people’s personal messages, location histories, or medical information [4, 37, 49]. We must worry about sharing of secrets, since the currently popular deep-learning methods
are prone to both memorizing details about their training
data and inadvertently revealing aspects of those details
in their behavior [44, 57]. Most worryingly, secrets may
be shared widely: models are commonly made available
to third parties, or even the public, through black-box
prediction services on the network, or as white-box pretrained models [8, 24].
Contributions. We introduce the entropy-based metric exposure for measuring a models memorization of a
given secret, and show how this metric can be efficiently
estimated using numerical methods. We focus our study
specifically on deep-learning generative sequence models trained on text data (as used in, e.g., language models
and translation) where the secrets may be, for example,
social-security or credit card numbers. We empirically
establish that secrets are memorized early and quickly
during training, with models often fully memorizing
them in fewer than a dozen epochs, long before training completes. Furthermore, for a given training data
corpus we show that memorization occurs even when secrets are very rare (one in a million) and when models are
small (the number of parameters are a fraction of the corpus size). While common techniques for regularization
(like weight decay, dropout, or early-stopping) may improve generalization, they do not inhibit memorization.
Further, we leverage our exposure metric to provide additional evidence for prior results [26, 28, 32, 45, 57].
Building on the above, we develop the first mechanisms for efficiently extracting secrets from deeplearning models, given only black-box access. To
demonstrate their practicality we apply them to real-
Machine learning models based on neural networks and
deep learning are being rapidly adopted for many purposes. What those models learn, and what they may
share, is a significant concern when the training data may
contain secrets and the models are public—e.g., when a
model helps users compose text messages using models
trained on all users’ messages.
This paper presents exposure, a simple-to-compute
metric that can be applied to any deep learning model
for measuring the memorization of secrets. Using this
metric, we show how to extract those secrets efficiently
using black-box API access. Further, we show that unintended memorization occurs early, is not due to overfitting, and is a persistent issue across different types of
models, hyperparameters, and training strategies. We experiment with both real-world models (e.g., a state-ofthe-art translation model) and datasets (e.g., the Enron
email dataset, which contains users’ credit card numbers)
to demonstrate both the utility of measuring exposure
and the ability to extract secrets.
Finally, we consider many defenses, finding some ineffective (like regularization), and others to lack guarantees. However, by instantiating our own differentiallyprivate recurrent model, we validate that by appropriately investing in the use of state-of-the-art techniques,
the problem can be resolved, with high utility.
1
Dawn Song
University of California, Berkeley
Introduction
Once a secret has been learned, it can be difficult not to
share it more widely—whether it is revealed indirectly,
by our actions, by accident, or directly—as artfully explored in Joseph Conrad’s The Secret Sharer [9].
This issue also arises in the domain of machine learning: whenever training data contains sensitive information, a natural concern is whether the trained model has
learned any secrets, and whether the model may possibly
share those secrets, whether directly or indirectly.
1
updates the weights θ of the neural network by setting
world models and data, e.g., to extract credit card numbers from models trained on the Enron email data. Our
algorithms are scalable as well as efficient, and vastly
outperform brute-force methods, giving results in minutes on modest hardware, even when applied to the large
search spaces, such as credit card numbers.
Finally, we consider a range of defenses for preventing
the unintended memorization of secrets, thereby thwarting their extraction. We find regularization to be ineffective as a defense, and pattern-matching based sanitization likely to be both fragile and incomplete. We develop new state-of-the-art differentially-private recurrent
models, which offer strong guarantees along with good
utility, and empirically verify that they can prevent the
unintended sharing of secrets. In its totality, we find
our work provides strong motivation for differentiallyprivate learning methods; we advocate their use to control memorization and thwart extraction of secrets.
2
0
θnew
That is, adjust the weights -far in the direction that minimizes the loss of the network using the current θ. Here,
is called the learning rate.
It is often necessary to train over the training data X
multiple iterations (each iteration is called one epoch) in
order to reach maximum accuracy.
2.2
Generative Sequence Models
A generative sequence model is a fundamental module
for many tasks such as language-modeling, translation,
and dialogue systems. A generative sequence model is
designed to generate a sequence of tokens x1 ...xn according to an (unknown) distribution Pr(x1 ...xn ).
Generative sequence models empirically compute
this distribution, which can be decomposed by Bayes’
rule as Pr(x1 ...xn ) = Πni=1 Pr(xi |x1 ...xi−1 ) into a
sequence of computations of conditional distribution
Pr(xi |x1 ...xi−1 ) for a single token xi at timestep i.
Modern generative sequence models employ neural
networks to estimate this conditional distribution. We
write this probability of a neural network fθ with input
x1 ...xi−1 outputting xi as
Background: Neural Networks
This section presents the technical preliminaries relevant
to our work, covering material that will look familiar to
readers knowledgeable about neural networks and recurrent generative sequence models.
2.1
m
1 X
∇L(x̄j , ȳj , θ)
← θold − 0
m j=1
Concepts, Notation, and Training
A neural network is a parameterized function fθ (·) that
is designed to approximate an arbitrary function. Neural networks are most often used when it is difficult to
explicitly formulate how a function should be computed,
whereas what to compute can be effectively specified using examples, known as training data. The architecture
of the network is the general structure of the computation, while the parameters (or weights) are the concrete
internal values θ used to compute the function.
We use standard notation [22]. Given a training set
X = {(xi , yi )}m
i=1 consisting of the m training data xi
and labels yi , the process of training teaches the neural
network to map each given instance to the corresponding label. Training is achieved through performing nonlinear optimization, e.g., by performing gradient descent
with respect to the parameters θ on a loss function that
measures how close the network is to correctly classifying each input. The most common loss
P function used
is the cross-entropy loss H(p, q) = − p(z) log(q(z)),
Pfθ (xi |x1 ...xi−1 ) = Pr(xi |fθ (x1 ...xi−1 ))
A neural network typically handles fixed-sized inputs,
but fθ takes a sequence with a variable-length as its input. To handle this case, the deep learning community
typically takes one of the following two approaches:
• Fixed-size windowing partitions the text into
multiple (possibly overlapping) fixed-size subsequences, treating each of them independently.
• Stateful input processing, e.g., using recurrent neural networks (RNNs). An RNN takes two arguments, a current token (e.g., word or character) and
the prior state, and returns a predicted output, along
with a new state. Thus, RNNs can process arbitrarylength text sequences.
We consider both architectures in this paper. When
taking the former setup, we use convolutional neural networks (which can perform well on text [20, 21]). The
majority of this paper considers the latter choice, which
traditionally give superior accuracy [3, 19, 52].
z
and so the sample-wise loss is L(x, y, θ) = H(fθ (x), y)
for a network fθ .
To perform training, we first sample a random
minibatch B consisting of labeled training examples
0
0
{(x̄j , ȳj )}m
j=1 drawn from X (where m is the batch size;
often between 32 and 1024). Standard gradient descent
2.3
2
Overfitting in Machine Learning
Overfitting is one
3.0
Validation Loss
of the core diffiTraining Loss
2.5
culties in machine
learning.
It is
2.0
much easier to produce a classifier
1.5
that can perfectly
label the training
1.0
data than a clas0
20
40
sifier that generEpochs
alizes to correctly
Figure 1: A model overfitting.
label new, previously unseen data.
Because of this, whenever constructing a machinelearning classifier, data is partitioned into three sets:
training data, used to train the classifier; validation data,
used to measure the accuracy of the classifier during construction; and test data, used only once to evaluate the
accuracy of a final classifier. This provides a metric to
detect when overfitting has occurred. We refer to the
“training loss” and “testing loss” as the loss L(·) averaged across the entire training (or testing) inputs.
Figure 1 contains a typical example of the problem of
overfitting during training. Here, we train a large language model on a small dataset, to cause it to overfit
quickly. Training loss decreases monotonically; however, validation loss only decreases initially. Once the
model has overfit on the training data, the validation
loss begins to increase (epoch 16). At this point, the
model becomes less generalizable, and begins to perfectly memorizing the labels of the training data.
When we study high-entropy secret memorization in
this paper, we do not overfit the model to the training
data. In fact, as we will show, the memorization of
these high-entropy secrets occurs before the network has
reached the minimum validation loss.
Cross-Entropy Loss
training on email data, we might be concerned about the
data containing the secret “My social security number is
123-45-6789”.
We assume the format is known to the adversary, (e.g.,
”). To obtain a coms = “My SSN is
pleted secret, we therefore fill in the holes in the format
with some randomness (e.g., r = “123456789”). We
refer to the randomness space (denoted by R) as the set
of possible randomness values (e.g., nine digits, 0-9).
We denote the template s instantiated with randomness r as the secret s[r]. Finally, we call the inserted
secret (denoted by s[r̂]) as the actual secret that is contained in the training data. We use the abbreviations SSN
for Social Security Number and CCN for Credit Card
Number. The problem we study then asks
Given a known format, can we extract completed secrets from a model when given only
black-box accesses?
We consider a scenario that a machine learning service
provider trains a sequence generative model using their
private data, and exposes accesses to the model allowing us to query Pfθ (xi |p1 ...pi−1 ) (but does not allow us
to inspect the weights θ). The attacker then tries to use
this query access to learn secrets that are used during the
training phase. Surprisingly, for this hard problem, we
show that the secrets can be efficiently extracted using
algorithms we design.
3.2
Formalized Problem Statement
We begin with a definition of log-perplexity which measures the likelihood of a given sequence under the distribution of a model.
Definition 1. The log-perplexity of a secret x is
Pxθ (x1 ...xn )
3
=
Motivation and Problem Statements
=
In this section, we provide an overview of the memorization problem in deep-learning generative sequence models, and how to extract the secrets from the models via
black-box accesses. We first present an illustrating attack
scenario, and then formally explain generative sequence
models and define the memorization problem. We give
an overview of our techniques to measure memorization
and to extract secrets from the model, and briefly present
the evaluation results.
3.1
− log2 Pr(x1 ...xn )
n
X
− log2 Pr(xi |fθ (x1 ...xi−1 ))
i=1
We would like to define the memorization of a model
with respect to the above log-perplexity. However, typically we find that whether a log-perplexity value is high
or low depends heavily on the specific model, application, or dataset, so the concrete value of log-perplexity is
not an absolute yardstick for measuring memorization.
Memorization Problem: Given a model fθ , a format s,
and a randomness r ∈ R (the randomness space), we
say fθ memorizes r if the log-perplexity of s[r] is among
the smallest for r ∈ R, and completely memorizes r if
the log-perplexity of s[r] is the absolute smallest. 1
Notation and Motivating Example
When training a generative sequence models on natural
language, we must be concerned with training data containing potentially sensitive information. For example, if
1 When
3
considering multiple secrets we discuss each independently.
Let the secret format s = “The random number is
”. We then chose a completely random
r̂, and insert s[r̂] at a random position one time in the
Penn Treebank dataset. We train our language model
on this modified dataset, and compute its log-perplexity
Pxθ (s[r̂]) versus the log-perplexity of a different (not inserted) secret r0 of the same format Pxθ (s[r0 ]). Our hypothesis, that memorization is occurring, is therefore that
Pxθ (s[r̂]) < Pxθ (s[r0 ]).
In this work, we propose an alternative measurement, referred to as relative exposure, which captures
the relative rank of a secret among all other possible
secrets without depending directly on the absolute logperplexity. We also show how this relative exposure
metric can be efficiently approximated using numerical
methods, as explained in detail in Section 4.
Given our definition of log-perplexity, the problem of
extracting a secret from a model can thus be defined as
finding the one from all possible alternatives with the
lowest log-perplexity. Formally, we have
Results. We perform the above experiment 100 times.
We train each model for only one epoch (i.e., after training the model on the secret one time), and compare the
log-perplexity of s[r̂] and s[r0 ]. In 88 of the cases we observe Pxθ (s[r̂]) < Pxθ (s[r0 ]), allowing us to reject the
null hypothesis and conclude there the model has at least
partially memorized the secret (at p-value p < 10−30 ).
Secret Extraction Problem: Given a model fθ , a format s, and a randomness space R, the secret extraction
problem searches for r∗ = argmin Pxθ (s[r]).
r∈R
We present several methods to solve this problem,
both exactly and approximately, in Section 5.
4
4.2
Although log-perplexity is helpful to demonstrate that
neural networks memorize training data, it is unclear to
what extent this occurs. To aid our study, we define the
rank as an improve measure:
Measuring Unintended Memorization
In this section we perform simple experiments to concretely demonstrate that neural networks memorize secrets, by showing that models memorize random numbers inserted in the training data.
4.1
Exposure: An Improved Measure
Definition 2. The rank of a secret s[r] is
rankθ (s[r]) = |{r0 ∈ R : Pxθ (s[r0 ]) ≤ Pxθ (s[r])}|
Memorization in Neural Networks
We now repeat the experiment from earlier, only train
our language model to minimum validation loss instead
of stopping after one epoch. When we compute the rank
of the inserted secret s[r̂] by enumerating all possible secrets, we find that rankθ (s[r̂]) = 1 (i.e., that s[r̂] has the
lowest log-perplexity among all possible secrets).
The definition of rank is useful and conceptually simple, although computationally expensive, as we must
compute the log-perplexity of all possible secrets.
To overcome this issue, we define a new measure: the
exposure. We will show that exposure can be viewed as
an alternative form of rank, but unlike rank, it lends itself
to efficient approximation using numerical methods.
For the remainder of this section, we use as our case
study a character-level language model [5, 38]: given a
sequence of text data, a language model predicts the next
token (character, in this case) that will occur. Language
models are well-studied in other domains, and have been
shown to be effective at many different tasks [38, 42, 53].
Demonstrating that neural networks memorize their
training data requires carefully constructed experiments.
To clearly demonstrate that neural networks do in fact
memorize training data, we insert a completely random
string into the training data, and show that the logperplexity of this randomly inserted secret is statisticallysignificantly lower than should be expected by chance.
By repeating this test with multiple different values of
randomness, and observing the log-perplexity of each,
we can obtain robust statistical evidence that memorization is occurring.
Definition 3. Given a secret s[r], a model with parameter θ, and the randomness space R, the exposure of a
secret s[r] is as follows. (Theorem 1 in Appendix C derives the relation to rank.)
exposureθ (s[r]) = − log2 Pr Pxθ (s[t]) ≤ Pxθ (s[r])
Experimental setup. We train a two-layer LSTM with
200 hidden units (with approximately 600k trainable parameters) on the Penn Treebank dataset [35] (approximately 5MB of data). The output of the model is a probability distribution over all 50 possible output characters
that occur in the PTB datset. Full hyperparameter settings are given in Table 8 (Appendix A).
t∈R
= log2 |R| − log2 rankθ (s[r])
Note that |R| is a constant. Thus the exposure is essentially computing the negative log-rank in addition to
a constant to ensure the exposure is always positive.
4
Frequency (×104)
6
Kolmogorov–Smirnov goodness-of-fit test [36] for 106
iterations, we fail to reject the null hypothesis (p > 0.1).
At 109 iterations, the test is able to reject the null hypothesis (p < 0.01). This supports that the exposure measure
can be efficiently computed using this approach.
Note that while the relative exposure is upper-bounded
by log2 |R|, when the inserted phrase is more likely than
all others, the estimated relative exposure has no theoretical upper bound. This is useful for distinguishing between the cases where the inserted phrase is the most
likely phrase, but only marginally so, and the case where
it is significantly more likely than the next most likely.
SN-PDF
Measured
distribution
5
4
3
2
1
0
50
100
150
200
Log-Perplexity of secrets s[r]
Figure 2: Skew normal fit to the measured perplexity distribution.
4.3
5
We now present different algorithms to extract secrets
from a model. Given black-box access to a model with
parameters θ and a format s, extracting the random r
from the model is equivalent to finding r that minimizes
Pxθ (s[r]). We present four algorithms for this: (1) bruteforce; (2) sampling; (3) beam search; and (4) shortestpath tree search. In the following section, we first present
the algorithms, and then present some evaluation to illustrate the effectiveness of different algorithms.
Efficiently Approximating Exposure
Using random sampling to estimate exposure is effective
when the rank of the secret is large enough that other secrets s[r0 ] where Pxθ (s[r0 ]) ≤ Pxθ (s[r]) are likely to be
found in a random search. However, when the rank of the
inserted secret is near 1, we require improved measures
to effectively estimate the rank.
To compute exposureθ (s[r]), first observe
Pr Pxθ (s[t]) ≤ Pxθ (s[r])
t∈R
X
=
Pr Pxθ (s[t]) = v .
v≤Pxθ (s[r])
5.1
Thus, from its summation form, we can approximate the
discrete distribution of log-perplexity using an integral of
a continuous distribution using
Z
Brute-force algorithm
The brute-force algorithm simply enumerates all possible
r ∈ R, computes Pxθ (s[r]), and selects the one with the
smallest value. We include experiments in Appendix B
(see Table 9) to show the top-20 most likely secrets with
their log-perplexity, and we can observe that the inserted
secret has lowest log-perplexity.
While it is effective, it can be extremely slow when the
randomness space R, is large. For example, the space
of all credit card numbers is 1016 ; brute-force over this
space may take up to 4,100 GPU-years.
t∈R
exposureθ (s[r]) ≈
Black Box Secret Extraction
Pxθ (s[r])
ρ(x) dx
0
where ρ(x) is the continuous density function.
To implement this idea, we must choose a continuous distribution class so that (a) the integral can be efficiently computed, and (b) the continuous distribution
class can accurately approximate the discrete distribution
Pr(Lθ (s[r]) = v). In this work, we use a skew-normal
distribution [41] with mean µ, standard deviation σ 2 , and
skew α.
The above approach can effectively approximate the
exposure. Figure 2, shows a histogram of the logperplexity of all 109 different secrets, overlayed with the
approximated skew-normal distribution in dashed red.
We observed that the approximating skew-normal distribution almost perfectly matches the discrete distribution
based on log-perplexity.
No statistical test can confirm that two distributions
match perfectly; instead, tests can only reject the hypothesis that the distributions are the same. When we run the
5.2
Generative Sampling
We can use a generative model to sample a set of secrets, and then can select the one minimizing Pxθ (·).
Since our goal is to find the secret s[r̂] with minimum
log-perplexity (and therefore maximum likelihood), it
follows that randomness r̂ should be more likely to be
sampled than others. Thus, sampling a small subset of
{ri } ⊂ R is more efficient than brute-force, but maintains a high probability of finding s[r̂].
The sampling process starts with an empty string, and
expands it with one token (e.g., a character) at a time.
When expanding the i-th token, it references the template s. If si is not a , the algorithm adds si directly at
the end of generated string; otherwise, it samples a token
from the distribution of valid tokens (e.g., all digits 0-9)
5
search, is guaranteed to find the string with minimum
log-perplexity.
At a high level, in the same way beam search can be
viewed as breadth-first search (with a limited-size frontier), our shortest path algorithm is essentially a variant
of Dijkstra’s algorithm [10].
We can organize all possible partial strings generated
from the template s as a tree, where the empty string
is at the root. A partial string b is a child of a if b expands one token t from a. The edge weight from a to
b is − log Pfθ (t|a). Therefore, finding s[r] minimizing
the cost of the path is equivalent to minimizing its logperplexity. Figure 3 presents an example to illustrate the
idea.
Figure 3: An example to illustrate the shortest path search algorithm.
Each node represents one partially generated string. Each edge denotes
the conditional probability P (xi |x1 ...xi−1 ). The path corresponding
to the secret (i.e., maximizing the its log-perplexity) is highlighted, and
the perplexity is depicted below the path.
defined by Pfθ (xi |x1 ...xi−1 ) = Pr(xi |fθ (x1 ...xi−1 )).
The process terminates when the length of the generated string is identical to the length of the template s.
The sampling algorithm repeats the sampling process N
times and adds each generated string r into the set {ri }.
5.3
The shortest path algorithm is inspired by Dijkstra’s
algorithm [10] which computes the shortest distance on
a graph with non-negative edge weights. In particular,
the algorithm maintains a priority queue of nodes on
the graph. To initialize, only the root node (the empty
string) is inserted into the priority queue with a weight
0. In each iteration, the node with the smallest weight
is removed from the queue. Assume the node is associated with a partially generated string p and the weight
is w. Then for each token t such that p@t is a child of
p, we insert the node
p@t into the priority queue with
w + −log Pfθ (t|p) , where − log Pfθ (t|p) is the weight
on the edge from p to p@t.
Beam search
Given a model that can predict likelihood scores of future
text occurring given some context, beam search is the
de facto procedure used in deep learning to compute the
most likely output [20, 34, 52].
Beam search keeps a set of at most N candidate partially generated strings, and iteratively extends the length
of each candidate, keeping only the top N likely. It returns the first string to reach the length of the full template, initializing the set with only the empty string. On
each iteration i, beam search expands every string in the
set with every possible token.
Formally, beam search explores a sequence of sets.
Each set Sk = {pj }nj=1 has n ≤ N partially-generated
prefix strings pj of a potential secret. Then, its successor
set is Sk+1 = {p@t | p ∈ Sk ∧ t ∈ σ(sk+1 )}, where @
denotes string concatenation. Here, t is a token, and
(
{0, 1, . . . 9} if sk =
σ(sk ) =
{sk }
otherwise.
The algorithm terminates once the node pulled from
the queue is a leaf node (i.e., a node of maximum length).
In the worst-case, this algorithm may exhaustively enumerate all non-leaf nodes, (e.g., when all possible strings
are evenly distributed). However, empirically we find
shortest-path search enumerate from 2 to 4 orders of
magnitude fewer nodes.
During this process, the main computational bottleneck is computing the edge weights − log P (t|p). A
modern GPU can simultaneously evaluate a neural network on many thousand inputs in the same amount of
time as it takes to evaluate one. To leverage this benefit,
we pull multiple nodes from the priority queue at once
in each iteration, and compute all edge weights to their
children simultaneously. In doing so, we observe a 50×
to 500× reduction in overall runtime.
Once Sk+1 is computed, we retain only the smallest N
elements (as determined by perplexity).
Unfortunately, we find beam search ineffective at extracting the lowest perplexity secret. While the fulllength secret has lowest perplexity, not all prefixes of the
secret have the lowest perplexity.
5.4
Applying this optimization violates the guarantee that
the first leaf node found is always the best. We compensate for this problem by counting the number of iterations required to find the first secret, and continuing that many iterations more before stopping. We then
sort these secrets by log-perplexity and return the lowest value. While this doubles the number of iterations,
each iteration is two orders of magnitude faster, and this
results in a substantial increase in performance.
Shortest Path Search
Both the sampling algorithm and beam search are approximation algorithms, which are not guaranteed to find
the optimal solution. Our next algorithm, shortest-path
6
Architecture
30
Testing Loss 3.0
Training Loss
25
2.5
20
2.0
15
1.5
10
5
0
GRU
GRU
LSTM
LSTM
CNN
CNN
CNN
WaveNet
WaveNet
Cross-Entropy Loss
Estimated exposure of inserted secret
35
1.0
0
5
10
15 20 25
Epochs of training
30
Layers
Units
Test Loss
Exposure
1
2
1
2
1
2
4
2
4
370
235
320
200
436
188
122
188
122
1.18
1.18
1.17
1.16
1.29
1.28
1.25
1.24
1.25
36
37
38
35
24
19
22
18
20
Table 1: Estimated exposure of an inserted secret for various model
architectures. All models have 620K (+/- 5K) parameters and so
have the same theoretical capacity. Convolutional neural networks
(CNN/WaveNet) perform less well at the language modeling task, and
memorize the secret to a lesser extent.
35
Figure 4: Comparing training and testing loss to estimated exposure
across epochs on 5% of the PTB dataset . Testing loss reaches a minimum at 10 epochs, after which the model begins to over-fit (as seen by
training loss continuing to decrease). Estimated exposure also peaks at
this point, and decreases afterwards.
To better understand why and how models memorize secrets, and to validate the utility of the exposure metric,
we perform additional experiments to study how memorization characteristics are reflected in the various aspects
of deep-learning training processes.
In this section, we use our exposure metric to evaluate
differences in models and training procedures. Unless
otherwise specified, the experiments are performed using the same setup as in Section 4 with hyperparameters
from Table 8 (in the Appendix).
epoch 40 (with p-value p < .001). While this is interesting, in practice it has little effect: the rankθ (s[r]) = 1
for all epochs after 10.
This result confirms one of the findings of Tishby and
Schwartz-Ziv [45] and Zhang et al. [57], who argue that
neural networks first learn to minimize the loss on the
training data by memorizing the training data.
The other observation we make is that memorization
begins to occur after only one epoch of training: at this
point, the exposure of the inserted secret is already 3,
indicating the secret is 23 = 8× more likely than a random phrase. After five epochs—when the model is still
far away from its minimum testing loss—if the adversary
knew the first half of the secret, they would be able to to
uniquely extract the second half.
6.1
6.2
6
Characterizing Memorization of Secrets
Across Training Iterations
Across Different Architectures
We now evaluate several different classical neural network architectures. The results are presented in Table 1.
We show that all of them suffer the memorization problem. We observe that the two classical recurrent neural networks, i.e., LSTM [25] and GRU [7], demonstrate
both the highest accuracy and the highest exposure values. Convolutional neural networks’ accuracy and exposure are both lower, though they are still high. Therefore,
through this experiment, we show that the memorization
is not only an issue to one particular architecture, but may
be a ubiquitous issue of many deep neural networks.
We begin our evaluation by studying how quickly neural networks memorize training data, and evaluate how
exposure relates to training and testing loss.
Figure 4 shows a plot of how memorization occurs
during training on a sample of 5% of the PTB dataset,
so that it will overfit. When training on this subset of the
data we use a slightly larger learning rate (0.01) to obtain
higher accuracy. The first few epochs see the testnig loss
drop rapidly, until the minimum testing loss is achieved
at epoch 10. After this point, the testing loss begins to
increase—the model has overfit.
Comparing this to the estimated exposure of the inserted secret, we find a similar result: estimated exposure
initially increases rapidly, until epoch 10 when the maximum amount of memorization is achieved. Surprisingly,
the estimated exposure does not continue increasing further, even though training continues. In fact, the exposure at epoch 10 is actually higher than the exposure at
6.3
Across Training Strategies
There are various settings for training strategies and techniques that are known to impact the accuracy of the final
model. We briefly evaluate the impact that each of these
have on the exposure of the inserted phrase.
7
Batch Size
50
16
32
64
128
256
512
1024
1.7
4.0
4.8
9.9
12.3
14.2
15.7
Number of LSTM Units
100 150 200 250
4.3
6.2
11.7
14.0
21.0
21.8
23.2
6.9
14.4
19.2
25.9
26.4
30.8
26.7
9.0
14.1
18.9
32.5
28.8
26.0
27.0
Secret
6.4
14.6
21.3
35.4
31.2
26.0
24.4
Exposure at Epoch
5
10
hsi
hei
hsi
hei
- - - - - - - -
5.0
6.3
5.0
6.1
5.1
5.2
6.1
7.1
6.8
7.5
9.5
11.1
Table 3: Estimated exposure of phrases when the adversary is aware
of different amounts of surrounding context (hsi and hei are unique
context phrases of 5 characters known to the adversary). The estimated
exposure is computed at epoch 5 and 10, before the models memorize
the inserted secret.
Table 2: Estimated exposure of models trained with varying model
sizes and batch sizes. Models of the same size trained for the same
number of epochs and reached similar test loss. Larger batch sizes, and
larger models, both increase the amount of memorization. The largest
memorization in each column is highlighted in bold, the second largest
in italic bold.
racy by taking a checkpoint from an earlier epoch from
those models that perform better, we found no statistically significant difference in the exposure of the inserted
secret with any of these settings; we therefore do not include these results.
Batch Size In stochastic gradient descent, recall that we
train on minibatches of multiple examples simultaneously, and average their gradients to update the model
parameters. This is usually done for computational
efficiency—due to their parallel nature, modern GPUs
can evaluate a neural network on many thousands of inputs simultaneously.
To evaluate the effect of the batch size on memorization, we train our language model with the batch size
ranging from 16 to 1024. (At each batch size, we train 10
models and average the results.) All models reach nearly
identical final training loss (1.11) and testing loss (1.17).
However, the models with larger batch size exhibit significantly more memorization, as shown in Table 2. This
experiment provides additional evidence for prior work
which has argued that using a smaller batch size yields
models which generalize better [26, 28, 32].
While this does give a method of reducing memorization for some models, it unfortunately comes at a significant cost: training with a small batch size is often prohibitively slow, and prevents parallelizing training across
GPUs (and servers, in a decentralized fashion).2
6.4
Across Secret Formats and Context
One surprising observations we make during studying
the memorization of secrets during training is that the
context that the adversary is aware of significantly affects
the ability of the adversary to detect whether memorization has occurred.
For example, in the prior sections, we assumed the adversary was aware of the prefix “The random number is”
and then attempted to identify the secret that followed.
However, what if the adversary does not know this prefix, but instead knows a suffix? Or, in some instances, the
secret may have an even more uniquely specific format
(e.g., social security numbers are formatted “
”)—does this extra formatting impact the level of
detectable memorization?
We find that the answer is yes: additional knowledge
about the format of the secret increases the ability of an
attacker to extract the randomness. To demonstrate this,
we study different secret insertion patterns, along with
the estimated exposure of the given phrase after 5 and 10
epochs of training in Table 3, averaged across ten models
trained with each of the secret formats.
For the first four rows of Table 3 we use the same
model, but provide the adversary with different levels of
context. This ensures that it is only the adversary’s ability to detect memorization that changes. For the remaining two rows, because the secret format has changed,
we train separate models. We find that increasing the
available context also increases the exposure, especially
when inner context is available; this additional context
becomes increasingly important as training proceeds.
Shuffling, Bagging, and Optimization Method. Given
a fixed batch-size, we now examine how other settings
impact memorization. We train our model with different optimizers: SGD, Momentum SGD [40, 48], RMSprop [50], Adagrad [14], Adadelta [56], and Adam [29];
and with either shuffling (where training data is shuffled
before each epoch), bagging (where training samples in
a minibatch are sampled with replacement from training
data).
Not all models converge to the same final test accuracy. However, when we control for the final test accu2 In fact, recent work has begun using even larger batch sizes (e.g.,
32K) to train models many orders of magnitude more quickly than previously possible [23, 54, 55].
8
# Insertions
1
1
2
5
10
80%
100%
100%
100%
Number of Unique Phrases
10
50
100
11%
38%
100%
100%
2%
18%
100%
100%
1%
16%
100%
100%
dataset (used in Section 4 and 6). Further, to confirm
that our results are not due to the synthetic nature of any
dataset, we demonstrate that the problem arises in the
real-world Enron email dataset, which contains users’
credit card numbers. Similarly, to confirm that our language model and training approach is not artificially encouraging memorization, we demonstrate extraction on
real-world, state-of-the-art unmodified models and training approaches—in particular, the Word-Level Language
Model and Neural Machine Translation Model available
from the open source Google TensorFlow Model Repository [11].
500
0.1%
1%
98%
100%
Table 4: Expected percentage of phrases that are uniquely extractable.
Each inserted secret has the same format.
6.5
Memorization across Multiple Simultaneous Secrets
As a final set of experiments, we now examine what happens when k secrets are inserted in the dataset (each potentially inserted multiple times). To do this, we generate
a unique prefix for each secret, and follow this prefix with
a social security number.
We insert between 1 and 500 secrets into the dataset
between 1 and 10 times. In Table 4 we show the results
of this analysis. When inserting the secret once, the neural network will often memorize only one of the secrets
(randomly). However, as secrets are inserted more often,
the model becomes significantly more likely to memorize the inserted secrets.
6.6
7.1
To evaluate different secret extraction approaches, we
use the same language model we have been using on the
PTB dataset with a single 9-digit random secret inserted
once. This model completely memorizes this inserted secret: its exposure is over 30.
Brute force. As a baseline, we are able to perform bruteforce secret extraction on a single social security number
in approximately 4 hours by enumerating all 109 secrets.
Generative sampling. Since it is a randomized algorithm, we evaluate the sampling-based algorithm multiple times. We observe that it runs on average for 107
iterations before it can find the secret with a probability
90%. This is 100× faster than the brute-force algorithm,
on average.
Intriguing Memorization Selectivity
The fact that models completely memorize secrets in the
training data is completely unexpected: our language
model is only 600KB when compressed3 , and the PTB
dataset is 1.7MB when compressed. Assuming that the
PTB dataset can not be compressed significantly more
than this, it is therefore information-theoretically impossible for the model to have memorized all training
data—it simply does not have enough capacity with only
600KB of weights. Despite this, when we repeat our experiment and train this language model multiple times,
the inserted secret is the most likely 80% of the time (and
in the remaining times the secret is always within the top10 most likely). At present we are unable to fully explain
the reason this occurs. We conjecture that the model
learns a lossy compression of the training data on which
it is forced to learn and generalize. But since secrets
are random, incompressible parts of the training data, no
such force prevents the model from simply memorizing
their exact details.
7
Beam search. We run the beam search with a maximum
pool size of 104 , but it still rarely generates the true inserted secret: while the full sequence is the most likely
of any, this is not the case for all prefixes. Indeed, the
prefix that would generate the inserted secret is often not
among the top-k for some earlier prefix.
Shortest path search. Figure 5 shows the estimated exposure of the inserted secret versus the number of iterations the shortest path search algorithm requires to find it.
The shortest-path search algorithm has reduced the number of secrets enumerated in the search from 109 to 105
(a factor of 10, 000×) when the exposure of the inserted
phrase is greater than 30. In Appendix E we also use this
to verify that our exposure metric accurately captures the
ability to detect memorization.
7.2
Evaluating the Extraction of Secrets
Dataset Evaluation: Enron Emails
We now confirm that our results on the PTB dataset,
where we artificially inserting one random number, also
hold true on real-world data. That is to say, instead of
running experiments on data with inserted secrets, we
In this section, we first evaluate different secret extraction algorithms using our language model on the PTB
3 See
Evaluating Extraction Algorithms
Appendix D.3 for how we do this compression.
9
Iterations of Dijkstra to find secret
User
Secret Type
107
A
CCN
52
106
B
SSN
13
105
C
SSN
SSN
SSN
16
10
22
D
SSN
32
F
SSN
13
G
CCN
CCN
CCN
36
29
48
104
103
20
25
30
35
40
Estimated exposure of inserted secret
Figure 5: Number of iterations of the shortest path search algorithm
required to identify the inserted 9-digit secret. Extracting with bruteforce search requires 109 iterations. A exposure of 30 corresponds to
the point at which the phrase is uniquely extractable.
X
X
X
This model is 80× larger than the character-level language model, at 48 million parameters. It learns a word
embedding [39] with a vocabulary size of 10,000 words,
and a two-layer LSTM with 1500 hidden units. The network is trained with dropout [47] and stochastic gradient
descent to minimum validation loss. We do not modify
the training process or architecture.
Since this is a word-level language model, we can not
just insert the secret as a sequence of numbers (e.g., “The
secret is 1234”) because “1234” would be considered a
word, and it is not one of the 10,000 words contained
in the vocabulary (all other words are replaced with the
special unknown-word token, hunki). We consider two
methods of allowing the language model to see this secret
• Split the numbers into each being their own word:
“The random number is 1 2 3 4”. This approach
is often taken in practice when using a limited-size
vocabulary [33, 43].
• Change the format of the secret to fit the model, and
use the English word for each number: “the random
number is one two three four”.
We train this 80× larger model on our PTB dataset
modified with one inserted secret, using all default model
parameters, and verify that no overfitting occurs.
We repeat our evaluation from Section 4.2 with the
same 9-digit secret using one of the two formats. When
using the former insertion approach—inserting the digits themselves — the estimated exposure of the inserted
phrase is 25. Using the latter approach, the exposure is
only 12; still 4000× more likely than if inserted by random chance, but much less rare than in the case of inserting the numeral digits. We find it fascinating that this
model is 80× larger than the character-level language
model, and has sufficient capacity to memorize the training data completely, but it actually memorizes less.
Evaluating Word-Level Models
To confirm that our language model is not only memorizing due to it being a character-level model, we train
a world-level language model. We take an off-theshelf word-level language model given in the TensorFlow Model repository [11] designed to be trained on
the PTB dataset.
4 http://www.cs.cmu.edu/
Extracted?
Table 5: Summary of results on the Enron email dataset. Three secrets
are extractable in under an hour; all are heavily memorized.
run experiments on naturally-occurring data where secrets are already present.
The Enron Email Dataset4 consists of several hundred
thousand emails sent between employees of Enron Corporation, and subsequently released by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in its investigation. The
complete dataset consists of the full emails, with attachments. Many users sent highly sensitive information
in these emails, including social security numbers and
credit card numbers.
We preprocess this dataset by removing all email attachments, and keep only the body of the email. We remove the text of the email that is being responded to, and
filter out automatically-generated emails and emails sent
to the entire company.
We separate emails by sender, ranging from 1.7MB
to 5.6MB (about the size of the PTB dataset) and train
one character-level language model per user who has sent
at least one secret. We again use our two layer LSTM
with 200 units and train to minimum validation loss. In
Appendix G we give detailed statistics of the datasets.
We summarize our results in Table 5. Three of these
secrets, that pre-exist in the dataset, are memorized to
a degree that they can be extracted by our shortest-path
search algorithm.
7.3
Exposure
enron/
10
Times
Inserted
Estimated
Exposure
1
2
4
10
21
33
8
Extracted?
As we have shown above, neural networks quickly memorize secrets. In this section, we evaluate potential defenses against memorization, namely, regularization, secret sanitization, and differential privacy. We empirically
analyze their impact on memorization and accuracy.
X
Table 6: Estimated exposure of a secret inserted in the Neural Machine
Translation model. When the model is trained on the secret inserted
four times, it can be extracted.
7.4
Evaluating Defenses
8.1
Regularization
It would be reasonable to assume that memorization is
due to the model overfitting to the training data. Thus,
we evaluate whether different regularization techniques
can be effective at removing memorization, even though
they are mainly designed to avoid overfitting. We evaluate three popular forms of regularizations, weight decay [30], dropout [47], and weight quantization [27]. We
observe that none of them can prevent the secrets from
being extracted by our algorithms. Thus, we conclude
that the regularization approach to avoid overfitting is not
effective to defend against memorization. Details of this
analysis are presented in Appendix D.
Evaluating Neural Translation Models
After language models, perhaps the next most common
use of generative sequence models is Neural Machine
Translation. NMT [3] is the process of training a neural network to translate from one language to another.
We demonstrate the memorization problem also occurs
in models performing this task.
Specifically, an NMT model takes its input as a sequence of words xi and outputs a sequence of words yi .
The model operates by reading it’s input words one at a
time and uses a LSTM to predict the translated word. For
notational simplicity, we represent this as a function f
which takes as input a sentence x and outputs a probability distribution f (x) over all of the possible translations
of this sentence.
We again make use of the TensorFlow Model repository [12] which contains an implementation one of the
initial papers demonstrating effective NMT [34].
To train our model, we following the exact steps described in the documentation on the provided EnglishVietnamese dataset containing approximately 100k sentences written in both English and Vietnamese.
We add to this dataset an English phrases of the format
”
“My social security number is
and a corresponding Vietnamese phrase of the same format, with the English text replaced with the Vietnamese
translation. We insert this pair once, twice, or four times.
When using NMT, we must slightly modify our definition of log-perplexity. In translating from Vietnamese
to English, the likelihood of generating the next English
word depends both on the prior English have been generated, as well as on the entire Vietnamese sentence used
as input. We therefore adjust the entropy measure Px(·)
to account for this modification; effectively, we modify
our notion of perplexity to fit the task.
Under this new perplexity measure, we can now compute the exposure of the inserted secret. We summarize
these results in Table 6. By inserting the secret only once,
the inserted secret is 1000× more likely than random
chance, and after inserting four times, it is completely
memorized.
8.2
Sanitization
Sanitization is a best practice for processing sensitive,
private data. However, one can not hope to guarantee
that all possible sensitive sequences will be found and
removed through such black-lists—e.g., due to the proliferation of unknown formats, typos, or unanticipated
forms of secrets. Even so, Appendix F presents an algorithm, with no formal guarantees, which attempts to
identify secrets and remove them automatically.
8.3
Differential Privacy
Differential privacy [13, 15, 16] is a privacy notion to
bound the information that of an algorithm is provided
about its input with high confidence. As background, we
introduce its formal definitions as follows.
Definition 4. A random algorithm A is (ε, δ)differentially private if
Pr(A(D) ∈ S) ≤ exp(ε) · Pr(A(D0 ) ∈ S) + δ
for any set S of possible outputs of A, and any two data
sets D, D0 that differ in at most one element.
Intuitively, this definition says that when adding or
removing one element from the input data set, the output distribution of a differentially private algorithm does
not change by much. Thus, differential privacy is a desirable property to defend against memorization. Consider that D contains one occurrence of the secret, and
11
9
No DP
With DP
D0 = D − {s}. Slightly imprecisely speaking, the output model of a differentially private training algorithm
running over D, which contains the secret, is similar to
the output model trained from D0 , which does not contain the secret. Thus, such a model can not memorize the
secret as completely.
We use an improved differentially-private stochastic
gradient descent algorithm (DP-SGD) from [1] to verify that differential privacy is an effective defense against
memorization. We use the open source code of DP-SGD
from the authors5 to train our character-level language
model from Section 4. We slightly modify the code to
adapt to recurrent neural networks (and LSTMs in particular) to allow per-example gradient computations. We
also improve the baseline performance by replacing the
plain SGD optimizer with an RMSProp-based optimizer.
We train six differentially private models using various values of ε for 100 epochs on the PTB dataset augmented with one secret value. Training a differentially
private algorithm is known to be slower than standard
training; our un-optimized implementation of this algorithm is 10 − 100× slower than standard training. For
computing the (ε, δ) privacy budget we use the moments
accountant introduced in [1]. We set δ = 10−9 in each
case. The gradient is clipped by a threshold L = 10.0 to
avoid gradient explosion. We initially evaluate two different optimizers (the plain SGD used by authors of [1]
and RMSProp), but focus most experiments on training
with RMSProp as it tends to achieve much better baseline
results than SGD6 . Table 7 shows the evaluation results.
The most useful differentially-private model achieves
only 10% worse test accuracy than the baseline model
trained without differential privacy. As we decrease ε
to 1.0, the exposure drops to 1, the point at which this
secret is no more likely than any other, showing that
DP-RMSProp can fully eliminate the memorization effect from a model. Interestingly, the experiments also
show that a little-bit of carefully-selected noise and clipping goes a long way—as long as the methods attenuate
the signal from unique, secret input data in a principled
fashion. Even with a vanishingly-small amount of noise,
and values of ε that offer no meaningful theoretical guarantees, the measured exposure is negligible.
Testing
Loss
Estimated
Exposure
0.65
1.21
5.26
89
2 × 108
1 × 109
∞
1.69
1.59
1.41
1.34
1.32
1.26
2.11
1.1
2.3
1.8
2.1
3.2
2.8
3.6
N/A
N/A
1.86
1.17
9.5
31.0
Optimizer
ε
RMSProp
RMSProp
RMSProp
RMSProp
RMSProp
RMSProp
SGD
SGD
RMSProp
Table 7: The RMSProp models trained with differential privacy do not
memorize the training data and always have lower testing loss than
a non-private model trained using standard SGD techniques. (Here,
ε = ∞ means that only clipping is done, but that no noise is added.)
Backdoor (intentional) memorization. Perhaps the
most closely related work to ours is that of Song et al.
[46], who also study training data extraction. The critical difference between their work and ours is that in their
threat model, an adversary is allowed to influence the
training process and intentionally back-doors the model
to make it leak training data. They are able to achieve incredibly powerful attacks as a result of this threat model.
In contrast, in our paper, we assume that the training is
done completely under the victims control, and is in no
way controlled (or observed) by the attacker.
Membership Inference. We are not the first to study
the privacy implications of training on private data. Recent work has demonstrated membership inference attacks [44]: given a neural network F trained on training
data X , and an instance x, it is possible to construct a
membership oracle OF (x) that answers the question “Is
x a member of X , the training data of the model f (·)?”
Motivated by the notion of membership inference, we
make two contributions. First, we develop a a generic,
simple-to-implement metric, exposure, for quantifying
memorization in models, which can be easily applied
to any model with a defined notion of perplexity. For
this, instead of requiring the training of a new model, we
simply rely on the fact that if x ∈ X , then f (x) will
be more confident in its prediction. Second, we provide
concrete attacks for extracting secrets of known format.
(Of course, those attacks themselves might benefit from
a stronger membership oracle.)
Related Work
There is a large body of work related to the privacy of
training data. We briefly summarize related work.
5 https://github.com/tensorflow/models/tree/
master/research/differential_privacy/dp_sgd/
6 We do not perform hyperparameter tuning with SGD or RMSProp.
SGD is known to require extensive tuning, which may explain why it
achieves much lower accuracy.
Generalization in Neural Networks. The other inspiration for our work is the demonstration by Zhang et al.
[57] that standard models can be trained to perfectly fit
completely random data. Specifically, the authors show
12
that the same architecture that can classify MNIST [31]
digits correctly with 99.5% test accuracy can also be
trained on completely random data to achieve 100% train
data accuracy (but obviously poor test accuracy).
Because there is no way to learn to classify random
data, the only explanation is that the model has memorized the labels of the training data. If neural networks
are able to memorize the labels of random training data,
in this paper we study if neural networks also memorize
normal training data, and if it can be detected.
to several classes of machine learning algorithms [6], including neural networks [1].
In Section 8.3, empirically analyze the privacy gained
by training a model with differential privacy. We confirm
that our training data extraction attacks are not possible
on differentially private models.
10
Conclusions
Memorization of rare details appears to be a fundamental aspect of deep-learning training processes. This has
been indicated in earlier work [57], and this paper has
provided further supporting evidence via empirical analysis of generative sequence models. Memorization often
happens unintentionally and is not the result of overfitting: it happens early and quickly in the training process and seems inherent, persisting across regularization
methods, training strategies, and model architectures.
We show, in this paper, that it is possible to measure the extent to which memorization has occurred—
and even the extent to which individual “secrets” are
exposed—where secrets are unique input sequences of a
known or guessable format, such as credit-card numbers.
Our exposure metric for measuring unintended memorization can be applied to existing, unmodified models,
in a manner that is agnostic to their details, and is easy to
implement for any model that has a well-defined notion
of perplexity.
Unfortunately, the same methods used to construct our
exposure metric also allow for the efficient and scalable
extraction of secrets with only black-box access. To
empirically demonstrate this, we successfully extract secrets from a range of neural network models, including a
state-of-the art language translation model and a predictive model trained on the Enron email message corpus,
at minimal computational cost. Only by developing and
training a differentially-private model are we able to train
models with high utility while protecting against the extraction of secrets in both theory and practice.
Training data leakages. Ateniese et al. demonstrate
[2] that if an adversary is given access to a remote machine learning mode (e.g., support vector machines, hidden Markov models, neural networks, etc.) that performs
better than their own model, it is often possible to learn
information about the remote model’s training data that
can be used to improve the adversary’s own model. In
this work the authors “are not interested in privacy leaks,
but rather in discovering anything that makes classifiers
better than others.” In contrast, we focus only on the private training data.
Model stealing. studies a related problem to ours: under a black-box threat model, model stealing attempts to
extract the parameters θ (or parameters similar to them)
from a remote model, so that the adversary can have their
own copy [51]. While model extraction is designed to
steal the parameters θ of the remote model, training data
extraction is designed to extract the training data that was
used to generate θ. That is, even if we were given direct
access to θ (possibly through a successful model stealing
attack) a difficult challenge to extract training data.
Model inversion. [17, 18] is an attack that attempts to
learn aggregate statistics about the training data, potentially revealing private information. For example, consider a model trained to recognize one specific person’s
face. Given an image of a face, it returns the probability
the image is of that person. Model inversion constructs
an image that maximizes the confidence of this classifier
on the generated image; it turns out this generated image often looks visually similar to the actual person it is
meant to classify. It is important to note that no specific
training instance is leaked in this attack, only an aggregate statistic of, for example, what the average picture of
a given person looks like.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Martı́n Abadi, Ian Goodfellow, Ilya
Mironov, Kunal Talwar, and David Wagner for helpful discussion. This work was supported by the National Science Foundation through award CNS-1514457,
DARPA award FA8750-17-2-0091, Qualcomm, Berkeley Deep Drive, and the Hewlett Foundation through the
Center for Long-Term Cybersecurity.
Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the
author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the
National Science Foundation.
Private Learning. Along with the attacks described
above, there has been a large amount of effort spent on
training private machine learning algorithms. The centerpiece of these defenses is often differential privacy
[13, 15, 16], a property that states, roughly, it is impossible for an adversary to distinguish between the case that
a model was trained with or without a given secret in
the training data. Differential privacy has been applied
13
References
[19] F UNAHASHI , K.- I ., AND NAKAMURA , Y. Approximation of
dynamical systems by continuous time recurrent neural networks.
Neural networks 6, 6 (1993), 801–806.
[1] A BADI , M., C HU , A., G OODFELLOW, I., M C M AHAN , H. B.,
M IRONOV, I., TALWAR , K., AND Z HANG , L. Deep learning with differential privacy. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM
SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security
(2016), ACM, pp. 308–318.
[20] G EHRING , J., AULI , M., G RANGIER , D., AND DAUPHIN , Y. N.
A convolutional encoder model for neural machine translation.
arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.02344 (2016).
[21] G EHRING , J., AULI , M., G RANGIER , D., YARATS , D., AND
DAUPHIN , Y. N. Convolutional sequence to sequence learning.
arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.03122 (2017).
[2] ATENIESE , G., M ANCINI , L. V., S POGNARDI , A., V ILLANI ,
A., V ITALI , D., AND F ELICI , G. Hacking smart machines
with smarter ones: How to extract meaningful data from machine
learning classifiers. International Journal of Security and Networks 10, 3 (2015), 137–150.
[22] G OODFELLOW, I., B ENGIO , Y., C OURVILLE , A., AND B EN GIO , Y. Deep learning, vol. 1. MIT press Cambridge, 2016.
[23] G OYAL , P., D OLL ÁR , P., G IRSHICK , R., N OORDHUIS , P.,
W ESOLOWSKI , L., K YROLA , A., T ULLOCH , A., J IA , Y., AND
H E , K. Accurate, large minibatch sgd: Training imagenet in 1
hour. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.02677 (2017).
[3] BAHDANAU , D., C HO , K., AND B ENGIO , Y. Neural machine
translation by jointly learning to align and translate. ICLR (2015).
[4] B EAUFAYS ,
F.,
AND
R ILEY,
M.
The machine
intelligence
behind
gboard.
https:
//research.googleblog.com/2017/05/
the-machine-intelligence-behind-gboard.
html, 2017.
[24] G RAVE , E.
Pre-trained word vectors.
https:
//github.com/facebookresearch/fastText/
blob/master/pretrained-vectors.md, 2017.
[25] H OCHREITER , S., AND S CHMIDHUBER , J. Long short-term
memory. Neural computation 9, 8 (1997), 1735–1780.
[5] B ENGIO , Y., D UCHARME , R., V INCENT, P., AND JAUVIN , C.
A neural probabilistic language model. Journal of machine learning research 3, Feb (2003), 1137–1155.
[26] H OFFER , E., H UBARA , I., AND S OUDRY, D. Train longer, generalize better: closing the generalization gap in large batch training of neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.08741 (2017).
[6] C HAUDHURI , K., AND M ONTELEONI , C. Privacy-preserving
logistic regression. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2009), pp. 289–296.
[27] H UBARA , I., C OURBARIAUX , M., S OUDRY, D., E L -YANIV,
R., AND B ENGIO , Y. Quantized neural networks: Training neural networks with low precision weights and activations. arXiv
preprint arXiv:1609.07061 (2016).
[7] C HUNG , J., G ULCEHRE , C., C HO , K., AND B ENGIO , Y. Empirical evaluation of gated recurrent neural networks on sequence
modeling. NIPS Workshop (2014).
[28] K ESKAR , N. S., M UDIGERE , D., N OCEDAL , J., S MELYAN SKIY, M., AND TANG , P. T. P. On large-batch training for deep
learning: Generalization gap and sharp minima. ICLR (2016).
[8] C LARIFAI I NC . Image and video recognition API. https://
www.clarifai.com/, Nov 2017.
[9] C ONRAD , J. The Secret Sharer. EBook #220. Project Gutenberg, 2009. Originally published in Harper’s Magazine, 1910.
https://www.gutenberg.org/files/220/220-h/
220-h.htm.
[29] K INGMA , D., AND BA , J. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. ICLR (2015).
[10] C ORMEN , T., L EISERSON , C., R IVEST, R., AND S TEIN , C. Introduction to algorithms.
[30] K ROGH , A., AND H ERTZ , J. A. A simple weight decay can
improve generalization. In Advances in neural information processing systems (1992), pp. 950–957.
[11] D EVELOPERS , T. Models and examples built with tensorflow.
https://github.com/tensorflow/models, 2017.
[31] L E C UN , Y.
The mnist database of handwritten digits.
http://yann. lecun. com/exdb/mnist/ (1998).
[12] D EVELOPERS , T. Tensorflow neural machine translation tutorial.
https://github.com/tensorflow/nmt, 2017.
[32] L E C UN , Y., B OTTOU , L., O RR , G. B., AND M ÜLLER , K.R. Efficient backprop. In Neural networks: Tricks of the trade.
Springer, 1998, pp. 9–50.
[13] D INUR , I., AND N ISSIM , K. Revealing information while
preserving privacy.
In Proceedings of the twenty-second
ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART symposium on Principles of
database systems (2003), ACM, pp. 202–210.
[33] L UONG , M.-T., AND M ANNING , C. D. Achieving open vocabulary neural machine translation with hybrid word-character models. In Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) (Berlin,
Germany, August 2016).
[14] D UCHI , J., H AZAN , E., AND S INGER , Y. Adaptive subgradient
methods for online learning and stochastic optimization. Journal
of Machine Learning Research 12, Jul (2011), 2121–2159.
[34] L UONG , M.-T., P HAM , H., AND M ANNING , C. D. Effective approaches to attention-based neural machine translation. EMNLP
(2015).
[15] DWORK , C. Differential privacy: A survey of results. In International Conference on Theory and Applications of Models of
Computation (2008), Springer, pp. 1–19.
[35] M ARCUS , M. P., M ARCINKIEWICZ , M. A., AND S ANTORINI ,
B. Building a large annotated corpus of english: The penn treebank. Computational linguistics 19, 2 (1993), 313–330.
[16] DWORK , C., M C S HERRY, F., N ISSIM , K., AND S MITH , A.
Calibrating noise to sensitivity in private data analysis. In TCC
(2006), vol. 3876, Springer, pp. 265–284.
[36] M ASSEY J R , F. J. The kolmogorov-smirnov test for goodness
of fit. Journal of the American statistical Association 46, 253
(1951), 68–78.
[17] F REDRIKSON , M., J HA , S., AND R ISTENPART, T. Model inversion attacks that exploit confidence information and basic countermeasures. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (2015), ACM,
pp. 1322–1333.
[37] M C M AHAN , B., AND R AMAGE , D.
Federated learning:
Collaborative machine learning without centralized training data.
(2017). https://research.googleblog.com/2017/
04/federated-learning-collaborative.html,
2017.
[18] F REDRIKSON , M., L ANTZ , E., J HA , S., L IN , S., PAGE , D.,
AND R ISTENPART, T. Privacy in pharmacogenetics: An endto-end case study of personalized warfarin dosing. In USENIX
Security Symposium (2014), pp. 17–32.
[38] M IKOLOV, T., K ARAFI ÁT, M., B URGET, L., C ERNOCK Ỳ , J.,
AND K HUDANPUR , S. Recurrent neural network based language
model. In Interspeech (2010), vol. 2, p. 3.
14
[39] M IKOLOV, T., S UTSKEVER , I., C HEN , K., C ORRADO , G. S.,
AND D EAN , J. Distributed representations of words and phrases
and their compositionality. In Advances in neural information
processing systems (2013), pp. 3111–3119.
[56] Z EILER , M. D. Adadelta: an adaptive learning rate method.
arXiv preprint arXiv:1212.5701 (2012).
[57] Z HANG , C., B ENGIO , S., H ARDT, M., R ECHT, B., AND
V INYALS , O. Understanding deep learning requires rethinking
generalization. ICLR (2017).
[40] N ESTEROV, Y. A method of solving a convex programming problem with convergence rate o (1/k2). In Soviet Mathematics Doklady (1983), vol. 27, pp. 372–376.
[41] O’ HAGAN , A., AND L EONARD , T. Bayes estimation subject to
uncertainty about parameter constraints. Biometrika 63, 1 (1976),
201–203.
[42] R ADFORD , A., J OZEFOWICZ , R., AND S UTSKEVER , I. Learning to generate reviews and discovering sentiment. arXiv preprint
arXiv:1704.01444 (2017).
[43] S ENNRICH , R., H ADDOW, B., AND B IRCH , A. Neural machine
translation of rare words with subword units. In Association
for Computational Linguistics (ACL) (Berlin, Germany, August
2016).
[44] S HOKRI , R., S TRONATI , M., S ONG , C., AND S HMATIKOV, V.
Membership inference attacks against machine learning models.
In Security and Privacy (SP), 2017 IEEE Symposium on (2017),
IEEE, pp. 3–18.
[45] S HWARTZ -Z IV, R., AND T ISHBY, N. Opening the black
box of deep neural networks via information. arXiv preprint
arXiv:1703.00810 (2017).
[46] S ONG , C., R ISTENPART, T., AND S HMATIKOV, V. Machine
learning models that remember too much. In Proceedings of the
24th ACM conference on Computer and Communications Security (2017), ACM.
[47] S RIVASTAVA , N., H INTON , G. E., K RIZHEVSKY, A.,
S UTSKEVER , I., AND S ALAKHUTDINOV, R. Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. Journal of
machine learning research 15, 1 (2014), 1929–1958.
[48] S UTSKEVER , I., M ARTENS , J., DAHL , G., AND H INTON , G.
On the importance of initialization and momentum in deep learning. In International conference on machine learning (2013),
pp. 1139–1147.
[49] T EAM ,
D.
Deepmind health and personally
identifiable
data.
https://deepmind.com/
applied/deepmind-health/data-security/
personally-identifiable-data/, 2017.
[50] T IELEMAN , T., AND H INTON , G. Lecture 6.5-rmsprop: Divide the gradient by a running average of its recent magnitude.
COURSERA: Neural networks for machine learning 4, 2 (2012),
26–31.
[51] T RAM ÈR , F., Z HANG , F., J UELS , A., R EITER , M. K., AND
R ISTENPART, T. Stealing machine learning models via prediction apis. In USENIX Security Symposium (2016), pp. 601–618.
[52] W U , Y., S CHUSTER , M., C HEN , Z., L E , Q. V., N OROUZI ,
M., M ACHEREY, W., K RIKUN , M., C AO , Y., G AO , Q.,
M ACHEREY, K., ET AL . Google’s neural machine translation
system: Bridging the gap between human and machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.08144 (2016).
[53] YAO , Y., V ISWANATH , B., C RYAN , J., Z HENG , H., AND Z HAO ,
B. Y. Automated crowdturfing attacks and defenses in online
review systems. ACM CCS (2017).
[54] YOU , Y., G ITMAN , I., AND G INSBURG , B. Scaling sgd
batch size to 32k for imagenet training.
arXiv preprint
arXiv:1708.03888 (2017).
[55] YOU , Y., Z HANG , Z., H SIEH , C.-J., D EMMEL , J., AND
K EUTZER , K. 100-epoch imagenet training with alexnet in 24
minutes. ArXiv e-prints, Sep (2017).
15
A
Configuration of Memorization Study
C
Theorem 1. Give a secret s[r], a model with parameter
θ, and the space of randomnesses R, we have
Hyper-parameter Settings
Optimizer
Batch Size
Learning Rate
Decay Rate
Architecture
Units
Layers
Dropout
Epochs
Early-Stopping
Sequence Length
Formulating Exposure using Rank
exposureθ (s[r]) = log |R| − log rankθ (s[r]).
RMSProp
128
0.001
On Plateau
LSTM
200
2
None
100
Yes
20
Proof. We have
exposureθ (s[r])
=
log |R| − log rankθ (s[r])
=
=
Table 8: Hyperparameter settings for our character language model that
we use throughout this paper. Unless otherwise indicated (e.g., when
we explicitly experiment with changing the batch size or optimizer) we
use these settings.
B
=
0
− log E 1 Lθ (s[r ]) ≤ Lθ (s[r])
r 0 ∈R
|{r0 ∈ R : Lθ (s[r0 ]) ≤ Lθ (s[r])}|
− log 1 ·
|R|
0
|R| − |{r ∈ R : Lθ (s[r0 ]) ≤ Lθ (s[r])}|
0 ·
|R|
0
0
|{r ∈ R : Lθ (s[r ]) ≤ Lθ (s[r])}|
− log
|R|
− log rankθ (s[r]) − log |R|
=
Secrets Sorted by Log-Perplexity
D
Secret
The random number is 281265017
The random number is 281265117
The random number is 281265011
The random number is 286265117
The random number is 528126501
The random number is 281266511
The random number is 287265017
The random number is 281265111
The random number is 281265010
The random number is 281265811
The random number is 281265817
The random number is 286265175
The random number is 282665117
The random number is 286265017
The random number is 281965017
The random number is 281265517
The random number is 288265017
The random number is 281265018
The random number is 281266517
The random number is 286265177
Log-Perplexity
Expanded Regularization Evaluation
One of the core difficulties in training neural networks
is overfitting. Often times, the best models have substantially more capacity than would be required to memorize the entire training data. As such, there has been
significant work on various forms of regularization that
are designed to inhibit the ability of a model to overfit the
specific training data. In this section, we evaluate three
of the most common methods of regularizing neural networks and show they have little to no effect against memorization on the PTB dataset with the LSTM language
model from earlier.
14.63
18.56
19.01
20.65
20.88
20.99
20.99
21.16
21.36
21.90
21.95
22.12
22.16
22.24
22.25
22.41
22.61
22.63
22.69
22.78
D.1
Weight Decay
Weight decay [30] is a traditional approach to combat
overfitting. During training, an additional penalty is
added to the loss of the network that penalizes model
complexity.
Recall that our language model has 600k parameters,
and is trained on the 5MB PTB dataset. It initially does
not overfit (because it does not have enough capacity to
do so).
Therefore, when we train our model with weight decay, we do not observe any improvement in validation
loss, or any reduction in memorization.
Table 9: Secrets sorted by Log-Perplexity. The inserted secret —
281265017 — has the lowest log-perplexity. The remaining secrets
are all variants with slight modifications (i.e., by changing a few characters).
16
D.2
Actual rank of inserted secret
So, again, we take a slice of 5% of the training data,
and again train our model on this dataset. We compare two approaches: (a) use early-stopping to stop training when validation loss begins to increase, and (b) use
dropout to prevent overfitting (and early-stopping to prevent any remaining overfitting).
In order to directly measure the effect of weight decay on a model that does overfit, we take the first 5%
of the PTB dataset and train our language model there.
This time the model does overfit the dataset without regularization. When we add L2 regularization, we see less
overfitting occurs. However, we observe no effect on the
memorization.
Expected rank of
inserted secret
104
103
102
101
100
20
25
30
35
40
Estimated exposure of inserted secret
Figure 6: Actual number of phrases at least as likely as the inserted
phrase versus estimated exposure of the inserted phrase. Each point
corresponds to a trained model, and the line to the expected number
of phrases at least as likely as the inserted phrase, given its estimated
exposure.
Dropout
Dropout [47] is a more recent regularization approach
proposed that has been shown to effectively prevent overfitting in neural networks. Again, dropout does not help
with the original model on the full dataset (and does not
inhibit memorization).
We repeat the experiment above by training on 5% of
the data, this time with dropout. We vary the probability
to drop a neuron from 0% to 90%, and train ten models
at each dropout rate to eliminate the effects of noise.
At dropout rates between 0% and 20%, the final test
accuracy of the models are comparable (Dropout rates
greater than 30% reduce test accuracy on our model). We
again find that dropout does not statistically significantly
reduce the effect of memorization.
E
Expanded Overfitting Evaluation
As a brief aside, our shortest-path search algorithm
gives us a much more efficient method of verifying the
claim made earlier in Section 4.2 that estimated exposure closely mirrors the relative exposure. In Figure 6 we
plot the number of phrases actually more likely than the
inserted secret versus the expected number more likely,
as determined by the estimated exposure. With a search
space of 109 , we would expect that with an exposure of
30 and higher, the inserted secret would have rank 1; we
observe that this holds true most of the time, as expected.
F
D.3
105
Secret Sanitization
The second class of defenses we consider is to sanitize
secrets from the training data. Intuitively, if the defender
can identify secrets in the training data, then they can be
removed from the model before it is trained. Such an approach guarantees to prevent memorization if the secrets
can be identified, since the secrets will not appear in the
training data, and thus not be observed by the model during training.
The key challenge of this approach is how to identify
the secrets in the training data. Several heuristics can
be used. For example, if the secrets were known to follow some template (e.g., a regular expression), the defender may be able to remove all substrings matching the
template from the training data in a preprocessing step.
However, such heuristics cannot be exhaustive, and the
defender never be aware of all potential templates that
may exist in the training data. When the secrets cannot
be captured by the heuristics, the defense will fail.
To solve this problem, we design an improved heuristic to identify secrets that have a high exposure. In the
Quantization
In our language model, each of the 600K parameters is
represented as a 32-bit float. This puts the information
theoretic capacity of the model at 2.4MB, which is larger
than the 1.7MB size of the compressed PTB dataset. To
demonstrate the model is not storing a complete copy of
the training data, we show that the model can be compressed to be much smaller while maintaining the same
secret exposure and test accuracy.
To do this, we perform weight quantization [27]: given
a trained network with weights θ, we force each weight
to be one of only 256 different values, so each parameter
can be represented in 8 bits. As found in prior work,
quantization does not significantly affect validation loss:
our quantized model achieves a loss of 1.19, compared
to the original loss of 1.18. Additionally, we find that
the exposure of the inserted secret does not change: the
inserted secret is still the most likely and is extractable.
17
remainder of this section, we first explain the algorithm,
evaluate its effectiveness, and then discuss its limitations.
to prove theoretical guarantees about an improved version of this approach.
Identifying and removing secrets with log-perplexitydifference. Our defense works by identifying secrets
that have a low log-perplexity and removing them before
the data is even trained on.
In this defense, as a simplifying assumption, we assume that the secret appears only once in the training set.
The defense first partitions the training data into 2 even
partitions.
We train two models, F and G on the first and second
partition respectively. We enumerate all samples x in the
training data, and compute the log-perplexity-difference
defined as follows
LD(x) = max LF (x), LG (x) −min LF (x), LG (x) .
G
Intuitively, because the secret s[r̂] appears only once,
it will be placed in only one of the partitions (without
loss of generality assume it is placed in the first and so
F trains on it). Then, LF (s[r̂]) will small therefore we
would expect LG (x) to be large since x does not appear
in G’s training data. This ensures that LD(·) is large for
s[r̂].
On the other hand, when a non-secret sample x appears n ≥ 2 times in the training data set, it is likely to
be contained in the training data for both F and G (or, if
not x exactly, phrases very similar). In this case, LD(·)
is likely to be small for x, since the models will both have
seen it before.
Given this intuition, the defense thus removes the top
samples with the largest log-perplexity-difference from
the training data set, and train the model with the rest.
Expanded Enron Dataset Statistics
User
Secret
Type
Exposure
Times
Present
Dataset
Size
A
CCN
52
2
3.8MB
B
SSN
13
2
2.8MB
C
SSN
SSN
SSN
16
10
22
1
1
1
2.3MB
2.3MB
2.3MB
D
SSN
32
3
5.7MB
F
SSN
13
1
2.2MB
G
CCN
CCN
CCN
36
29
48
1
1
1
1.7MB
1.7MB
1.7MB
Table 10: Enron email dataset statistics.
Evaluation. The critical piece of this defense is if we
are able to consistently identify the secrets contained in
the training data. We randomly partition training into
two sets and train 100 times. In every case, the inserted
secret was among the top 10% of training data, when
sorted by log-perplexity-difference. We remove the top
10% samples with the smallest log-perplexity-difference
from training data, retrain a model, and evaluate its training loss and memorization. In doing so, the training loss
increases slightly from 1.18 to 1.27. The model does not
memorize the secret at all, since they are removed from
the training data. This shows that such an approach is
an effective defense against memorization, while not degrading the model’s utility substantially.
Limitations. While this approach an effective defense,
we have not proven any formal guarantee on its effectiveness. Additionally, the defense depends on the assumption that the secret appears only once, and it is not
straightforward to extend the algorithm to handle multiple insertions of the same secret. In future work we hope
18
| 2cs.AI
|
1
Semi-Parallel Deep Neural Network (SPDNN)
Hybrid Architecture, First Application on Depth
from Monocular Camera
Shabab Bazrafkan 1, Student, IEEE, Hossein Javidnia 1, Student, IEEE, Joseph Lemley 2, Student, IEEE,
Peter Corcoran3, Fellow, IEEE
Abstract—Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) techniques
are applied to the problem of determining the depth from a single
camera image (monocular depth). Fully connected CNN
topologies preserve all details of the input images, enabling the
detection of fine details, but miss larger features; networks that
employ 2×2, 4×4 and 8×8 max-pooling operators can determine
larger features at the expense of finer details. After designing,
training and optimising a set of topologies, these networks may
be combined into a single network topology using graph
optimization techniques. This “Semi Parallel Deep Neural
Network (SPDNN)” eliminates duplicate common network
layers, reducing network size and computational effort
significantly, and can be further optimized by retraining to
achieve an improved level of convergence over the individual
topologies. In this study four models are trained and have been
evaluated at 2 stages on the KITTI dataset. The ground truth
images in the first part of the experiment come from the
benchmark, and for the second part, the ground truth images are
the depth map results from applying a state-of-the-art stereo
matching method. The results of this evaluation demonstrate that
using post-processing techniques to refine the target of the
network increases the accuracy of depth estimation on individual
mono images. The second evaluation shows that using
segmentation data as the input can improve the depth estimation
results to a point where performance is comparable with stereo
depth estimation. The computational time is also discussed in this
study.
Index Terms— Depth Estimation, Deep Convolutional Neural
Networks (CNN), Monocular Image
The research work presented here was funded under the Strategic
Partnership Program of Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) and co-funded by
SFI and FotoNation Ltd. Project ID: 13/SPP/I2868 on “Next Generation
Imaging for Smartphone and Embedded Platforms”. This work is also
supported by an Irish Research Council Employment Based Programme
Award. Project ID: EBPPG/2016/280
1
S. Bazrafkan is with the Department of Electronic Engineering, College
of Engineering, National University of Ireland, Galway, University Road,
Galway, Ireland. (e-mail: [email protected]).
1
H. Javidnia is with the Department of Electronic Engineering, College of
Engineering, National University of Ireland, Galway, University Road,
Galway, Ireland. (e-mail: [email protected]).
2
J. Lemley is with the Department of Electronic Engineering, College of
Engineering, National University of Ireland, Galway, University Road,
Galway, Ireland. (e-mail: [email protected]).
3
P. Corcoran is with the Department of Electronic Engineering, College of
Engineering, National University of Ireland, Galway, University Road,
Galway, Ireland. (e-mail: [email protected]).
C
I. INTRODUCTION
omputing pixel depth values provides a basis for
understanding the 3D geometrical structure of images. As
it has been presented in recent research [1], using stereo
images provides an accurate depth due to the advantage of
having local correspondences; however, the processing times
of these methods is still an open issue.
To solve this problem, it has been suggested to use single
images to compute the depth values, but extracting depth from
monocular images requires extracting a large number of cues
from the global and local information in the image. Using a
single camera is more convenient in industrial applications.
Stereo cameras require detailed calibration and many
industrial use cases already employ single cameras – e.g.
security monitoring, automotive & consumer vision systems,
and camera infrastructure for traffic and pedestrian
management in smart-cities. These and other smart-vision
applications can greatly benefit from accurate monocular
depth analysis.
This challenge has been studied for a decade and is still an
open research problem.
Recently the idea of using neural networks to solve this
problem has attracted attention. In this paper, we tackle this
problem by employing a Deep Neural Network (DNN)
equipped with semantic pixel-wise segmentation utilizing our
recently published disparity post-processing method.
This paper also introduces the use of Semi Parallel Deep
Neural Networks (SPDNN). A SPDNN is a semi-parallel
network topology developed using a graph theory optimization
of a set of independently optimized CNNs, each targeted at a
specific aspect of the more general classification problem. For
the depth from monocular vision problem a fully-connected
topology, optimized for fine features, is combined with a
series of max-pooled topologies (2×2, 4×4 and 8×8) each
optimised for coarser image features. The optimized SPDNN
topology is re-trained on the full training dataset and
converges to an improved set of network weights.
It is worth mentioning that this network design strategy is
not limited to the ‘depth from monocular vision’ problem, and
further application examples and refinements will be
developed in a series of future publications, currently in press.
A. Depth Map
Deriving the 3D structure of an object from a set of 2D
points is a fundamental problem in computer vision. Most of
2
these conversions from 2D to 3D space are based on the depth
values computed for each 2D point. In a depth map, each pixel
is defined not by color, but by the distance between an object
and the camera.
In general, depth computation methods are divided into two
categories:
1- Active methods
2- Passive methods
Active methods involve computing the depth in the scene by
interacting with the objects and the environment. There are
different types of active methods, such as light-based depth
estimation, which uses the active light illumination to estimate
the distance to different objects [2]. Ultrasound and time-offlight (ToF) are other examples of active methods. These
methods use the known speed of the wave to measure the time
an emitted pulse takes to arrive at an image sensor [3].
Passive methods utilize the optical features of captured
images. These methods involve extracting the depth
information by computational image processing. In the
category of passive methods there are two primary approaches
a) Multi-view depth estimation, such as depth from stereo, and
b) Monocular depth estimation.
B. Stereo Vision Depth
Stereo matching algorithms can be used to compute depth
information from multiple images. By using the calibration
information of the cameras, the depth images can be
generated. This depth information provides useful data to
identify and detect objects in the scene [4].
In recent years, many applications, including time-of-flight
[5, 6], structured light [7], and Kinect were introduced to
calculate depth from stereo images. Stereo vision algorithms
are generally divided into two categories: Local and Global.
Local algorithms were introduced as statistical methods that
use the local information around a pixel to determine the depth
value of the given pixel. These kinds of methods can be used
for real time applications if they are implemented efficiently.
Global algorithms try to optimize an energy function to satisfy
the depth estimation problem through various optimization
techniques [8].
In terms of computation, global methods are more complex
than local methods, and they are usually impractical for real
time applications. Despite these drawbacks, they have the
advantage in being more accurate than local methods. This
advantage recently attracted considerable attention in
academic literature [9, 10].
For example, the global stereo model proposed in [9] works
by converting the image into a set of 2D triangles with
adjacent vertices. Later, the 2D vertices are converted to a 3D
mesh by computing the disparity values. To solve the problem
of depth discontinuities, a two layer Markov Random Field
(MRF) is employed. The layers are fused with an energy
function allowing the method to handle the depth
discontinuities. The method has been evaluated on the new
Middlebury 3.0 benchmark [10] and it was ranked the most
accurate at the time of the paper's publication based on the
average weight on the bad 2.0 index.
Another global stereo matching algorithm, proposed in [11],
makes use of the texture and edge information of the image.
The problem of large disparity differences in small patches of
non-textured regions is addressed by utilizing the color
intensity. In addition, the main matching cost function
produced by a CNN is augmented using the same color-based
cost. The final results are post-processed using a 5×5 median
filter and a bilateral filter. This adaptive smoothness filtering
technique is the primary reason for the algorithm’s excellent
performance and placement in the top of the Middlebury 3.0
benchmark [10].
Many other methods have been proposed for stereo depth,
such as PMSC [10], GCSVR [10], INTS [12], MDP [13],
ICSG [14], which all aimed to improve the accuracy of the
depth estimated from stereo vision, or to introduce a new
method to estimate the depth from a stereo pair. However,
there is always a trade-off between accuracy and speed for
stereo vision algorithms.
Table I shows an overview of the average normalized time
by the number of pixels (sec/megapixels) of the most accurate
stereo matching algorithms as they are ranked by the
Middlebury 3.0 benchmark, based on the “bad 2.0” metric.
The ranking is on the test dense set. This comparison
illustrates that obtaining an accurate depth from a stereo pair
requires significant processing power. These results
demonstrate that, today, these methods are too resource
intensive for real-time applications like street sensing or
autonomous navigation due to their demand for processing
resources.
To decrease the processing power of stereo matching
algorithms, researchers recently began to work on depth from
monocular images. Such algorithms estimate depth from a
single camera while keeping the processing power low.
C. Deep Learning
DNN (Deep Neural Networks) are among the most recent
approaches in pattern recognition science that are able to
handle highly non-linear problems in classification and
regression. These models use consecutive non-linear signal
processing units in order to mix and re-orient their input data
to give the most representative results. The DNN structure
learns from the input and then it generalizes what it learns into
data samples it has never seen before [15]. The typical deep
neural network model is composed of one or more
convolutional, pooling, and fully connected layers
accompanied by different regularization tasks. Each of these
units is as follows:
Convolutional Layer: This layer typically convolves the
3D image “I” with the 4D kernel “W” and adds a 3D bias term
“b” to it. The output is given by:
𝑃𝑃 = 𝐼𝐼 ∗ 𝑊𝑊 + 𝑏𝑏 (1)
where * operator is nD convolution and P is the output of the
convolution. During the training process, the kernel and bias
parameters are updated in a way that optimizes the error
function of the network output.
Pooling Layer: The pooling layer applies a (usually) nonlinear transform (Note that the average pooling is a linear
transform, but the more popular max-pooling operation is nonlinear) on the input image which reduces the spatial size of the
data representation after the operation.
3
TABLE I. COMPARISON OF THE PERFORMANCE TIME BETWEEN THE MOST ACCURATE STEREO MATCHING ALGORITHMS
Algorithm
Time/MP (s)
PMSC [10]
453
MeshStereoExt [9]
121
APAP-Stereo [10]
97.2
NTDE [11]
114
MC-CNN-acrt [16]
112
MC-CNN+RBS [17]
140
SNP-RSM [10]
258
MCCNN_Layout [10]
262
MC-CNN-fst [16]
1.26
LPU [10]
3523
MDP [13]
58.5
MeshStereo [9]
54
SOU4P-net [10]
678
INTS [12]
127
GCSVR [10]
4731
JMR [10]
11.1
LCU [10]
9572
TMAP [18]
1796
SPS [10]
49.4
IDR [19]
0.36
Programming
Platform
Hardware
C++
i7-6700K, 4GHz-GTX TITAN X
C, C++
8 Cores-NVIDIA TITAN X
1500 × 1000 (<= 400)
Matlab+Mex
i7 Core 3.5GHz, 4 Cores
n/a
i7 Core, 2.2 GHz-Geforce GTX TITAN X
1500 × 1000 (<= 400)
n/a
NVIDIA GTX TITAN Black
C++
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1650 0, 3.20GHz, 6 Cores32 GB RAM-NVIDIA GTX TITAN X
1500 × 1000 (<= 400)
Matlab
i5, 4590 CPU, 3.3 GHz
1500 × 1000 (<= 400)
Matlab
i7 Core, 3.5GHz
1500 × 1000 (<= 400)
n/a
NVIDIA GTX TITAN X
1500 × 1000 (<= 400)
Matlab
Core i5, 4 Cores- 2xGTX 970
1500 × 1000 (<= 400)
n/a
4 i7 Cores, 3.4 GHz
1500 × 1000 (<= 400)
C++
i7-2600, 3.40GHz, 8 Cores
1500 × 1000 (<= 400)
n/a
i7 Core, 3.2GHz-GTX 980
1500 × 1000 (<= 400)
C, C++
i7 Core, 3.2 GHz
1500 × 1000 (<= 400)
C++
i7 Core, 2.8GHz-Nvidia GTX 660Ti
1500 × 1000 (<= 400)
C++
Core i7, 3.6 GHz-GTX 980
750 × 500 (<= 200)
Matlab, C++
1 Core Xeon CPU, E5-2690, 3.00 GHz
Matlab
i7 Core, 2.7GHz
3000 × 2000 (<= 800)
C, C++
1 i7 Core, 2.8GHz
CUDA C++
NVIDIA GeForce TITAN Black
W × H (ndisp)
1500 × 1000 (<= 400)
1500 × 1000 (<= 400)
1500 × 1000 (<= 400)
1500 × 1000 (<= 400)
1500 × 1000 (<= 400)
1500 × 1000 (<= 400)
It is common to put a pooling layer after each convolutional
layer. Reducing the spatial size leads to less computational
load and also prevents over-fitting. The reduced spatial size
also provides a certain amount of translation invariance.
Fully Connected Layer: Fully connected layers are the
same as classical Neural Network (NN) layers, where all the
neurons in a layer are connected to all the neurons in their
subsequent layer. The neurons give the summation of their
input, multiplied by their weights, passed through their
activation functions.
Regularization: Regularization is often used to prevent
overfitting of a neural network. One can train a more complex
network (more parameters) with regularization and prevent
over-fitting. Different kinds of regularization methods have
been proposed. The most important are weight regularization,
drop-out [20], and batch normalization [21]. Each
regularization technique is suitable for specific applications,
and no single technique works for every task.
D. Monocular Vision Depth
Depth estimation from a single image is a fundamental
problem in computer vision and has potential applications in
robotics, scene understanding, and 3D reconstruction. This
problem remains challenging because there are no reliable
cues for inferring depth from a single image. For example,
temporal information and stereo correspondences are missing
from such images.
As the result of the recent research, deep Convolutional
Neural Networks (CNN) are setting new records for various
vision applications. A deep convolutional neural field model
for estimating depths from a single image has been presented
in [22] by reformulating the depth estimation into a continuous
conditional random field (CRF) learning problem. The CNN
employed in this research was composed of 5 convolutional
and 4 fully-connected layers. At the first stage of the algorithm
the input image was over-segmented into superpixels. The
cropped image patch centered on its centroid was used as
input to the CNN. For a pair of neighboring superpixels, a
number of similarities were considered and were used as the
input to the fully connected layer. The output of these 2 parts
was then used as input to the CRF loss layer. As a result, the
time required for estimating the depth from a single image
using the trained model decreased to 1.1 seconds on a desktop
PC equipped with a NVIDIA GTX 780 GPU with 6GB
memory.
It has been found that the superpixelling technique of [22] is
not a good choice to initialize the disparity estimation from
mono images because of the lack of the monocular visual cues
such as texture variations and gradients, defocus, or color/haze
in some parts of the image. To solve this issue a MRF learning
algorithm has been implemented to capture some of these
monocular cues [23]. The captured cues were integrated with a
stereo system to obtain better depth estimation than the stereo
4
system alone. This method uses a fusion of stereo + mono
depth estimation.
Depth Map
Semantic
Segmentation
Visible Single
Image
+
Deep Neural Network
Figure 1. The overview of the trained models in this paper. The semantic
segmentation is just used in two experiments
At small distances, the algorithm relies more on stereo vision,
which is more accurate than monocular vision. However, at
further distances, the performance of stereo degrades; and the
algorithm relies more on monocular vision.
E. Paper Overview
In this paper, a hybrid DNN is presented to estimate depth
from monocular cameras. The depth map from the stereo sets
are estimated using the same approach as [24] and they are
used as the target to train the network while using information
from a single image (the left image in stereo set) as input. Four
models are trained and evaluated to estimate the depth from
single camera images. The network structure for all the
models is same. In the first case, the input is simply the
original image. In the second case, the first channel is the
original image and the second channel is its segmentation
map. For each of these two cases, one of two different targets
are used; specifically, these targets were the stereo depth maps
with or without post-processing as explained in [24]. The
technical details of each model are presented in the next
section. Fig. 1 shows the overview of the general approach
used in this paper.
F. Contributions
In this paper two major contributions are presented:
1- A novel method to mix and merge several deep
neural networks called “Semi Parallel Deep Neural
Network (SPDNN)”.
2- The application of deep neutral networks and
SPDNN on estimating depth from a monocular
camera.
The rest of the paper is organized as follows: In the next
section the network structure, database preparation, and the
training process are presented. Section 3 discusses the results
and evaluation of the proposed method. The conclusion and
discussions are presented in the last section.
II.
METHODOLOGY
A. Network Structure
1) Semi-Parallel Deep Neural Network (SPDNN)
This paper is the first to introduce the SPDNN concept,
inspired from graph optimization techniques. In this method,
several deep neural networks are parallelized and merged in a
novel way that facilitates the advantages of each. The final
model is trained for the problem. Our observations show that
using this method reduces overfitting and provides superior
convergence compared to alternatives.
The merging of multiple networks using SPDNN is described
in the context of the current depth mapping problem. In this
particular problem, eight different networks were designed for
the depth estimation task. These are illustrated in Fig. 2 – Fig.
9 and will be described in the next section. None of these
networks on their own gave useful results on the depth
analysis problem. However, it was noticed that each network
tended to perform well on certain aspects of this task, while
failing at others. This led to the idea that it would be
advantageous to combine multiple individual networks and
train them in a parallelized architecture. Our experiments
showed that better output could be achieved by merging the
networks and then training them concurrently.
2) Individual Networks for Depth Analysis
The network shown in Fig. 2 is a deep fully convolutional
neural network (A fully convolutional neural network is a
network wherein all the layers are convolutional layers) with
no pooling and no padding. Therefore, no information loss
occurs inside the network, as there is no bottleneck or data
compression; this network is able to preserve the details of the
input samples. But the main problem is that this model is
unable to find big objects and coarse features in the image. In
order to solve this problem three other networks have been
designed as shown in Fig. 3 – Fig. 5. These three networks
take advantage of the max-pooling layers to gain transition
invariance and also to recognize bigger objects and coarser
features inside the image. These networks use 2×2, 4×4, and
8×8 max-pooling operators, respectively. Larger pooling
kernels allow coarser features to be detected by the network.
The main problem with these networks was that the spatial
details vanished as a result of data compression in pooling
layers.
After several attempts of designing different networks, the
observations showed that in order to estimate the depth from
an image, the network needed to see the whole image as one
object. To do that it requires the kernel to be the same size as
the image in at least one layer that is equivalent to a fully
connected layer inside the network.
In fully connected layers each neuron is connected to all
neurons in the previous/next layer. Due to the computationally
prohibitive nature of training fully connected layers, and their
tendency to cause overfitting, it is desirable to reduce the
number of these connections. Adding fully connected layers
results in a very tight bottleneck, which seems to be crucial for
the depth estimation task, but also causes the majority of the
details in the image to be lost. In Fig. 6 – Fig. 9 the networks
with fully connected layers are shown. These networks
correspond to networks in Fig. 2 – Fig. 5 but with
convolutional layers replaced with fully connected layers in
the right hand side of the network. Using different pooling
sizes before the fully connected layer will cause the network
to extract different levels of features, but all these
configurations introduce loss of detail.
Each of these eight configurations has its own advantages
and shortcomings, from missing the coarse features to missing
the details. None of these designs converged to a reasonable
depth estimation model.
5
input
input
output
Conv2D
Conv2D
Conv2D
Conv2D
Conv2D
Conv2D
Conv2D
Conv2D
3x3
3x3
3x3
3x3
3x3
3x3
3x3
3x3
(3C,1)
(3C,2)
(3C,3)
(3C,4)
(3C,5)
(3C,6)
(3C,7)
(3C,8)
output
Figure 2. Top row: network 1, Bottom row: graph corresponds to network1.
output
3x3
input
(3C,1)
Conv2D
Conv2D
Conv2D
3x3
3x3
3x3
(3C2P,2)
(3C2P,3)
Un-pool
2x2
Conv2D
Maxpool
2x2
input
Conv2D
Conv2D
Conv2D
Conv2D
3x3
3x3
3x3
3x3
(3C,5)
(3C2P,4)
(3C,6)
(3C,7)
(3C,8)
output
Figure 3. Top row: network 2, Bottom row: graph corresponds to network2.
output
3x3
input
(3C,1)
Conv2D
Conv2D
Conv2D
3x3
3x3
3x3
(3C4P,2)
(3C4P,3)
Un-pool
4x4
Conv2D
Maxpool
4x4
input
(3C4P,4)
Conv2D
Conv2D
Conv2D
Conv2D
3x3
3x3
3x3
3x3
(3C,5)
(3C,6)
(3C,7)
(3C,8)
output
Figure 4. Top row: network 3, Bottom row: graph corresponds to network3.
output
3x3
input
(3C,1)
Conv2D
Conv2D
Conv2D
3x3
3x3
3x3
(3C8P,3)
(3C8P,4)
(3C8P,2)
Figure 5. Top row: network 4, Bottom row: graph corresponds to network4.
Un-pool
8x8
Conv2D
Maxpool
8x8
input
Conv2D
Conv2D
Conv2D
Conv2D
3x3
3x3
3x3
3x3
(3C,5)
(3C,6)
(3C,7)
(3C,8)
output
6
output
input
Conv2D
Conv2D
3x3
3x3
3x3
3x3
Unpool
8x8
Max-pool
8x8
Conv2D
3x3
...
Conv2D
...
Conv2D
Fully-connected layers
With drop-out
input
(3C,1)
(3C,2)
(3C,3)
(3C,4)
(3C,7)
(30F,5) (330F,6)
output
Figure 6. Top row: network 5, Bottom row: graph corresponds to network5.
output
input
Conv2D
Conv2D
3x3
3x3
3x3
Unpool
8x8
Max-pool
4x4
Conv2D
3x3
...
3x3
Conv2D
...
Conv2D
Fully-connected layers
With drop-out
input
(3C,1)
(3C2P,2)
(3C2P,4)
(3C2P,3)
(30F,5) (330F,6)
(3C,7)
output
Figure 7. Top row: network 5, Bottom row: graph corresponds to network6.
output
input
Conv2D
Conv2D
3x3
3x3
3x3
3x3
Unpool
8x8
Max-pool
4x4
Conv2D
3x3
...
Conv2D
...
Conv2D
Fully-connected layers
With drop-out
input
(3C,1)
(3C4P,2)
(3C4P,3)
(3C4P,4)
(30F,5) (330F,6)
(3C,7)
output
Figure 8. Top row: network 7, Bottom row: graph corresponds to network7.
Output
Conv2D
Conv2D
3x3
3x3
3x3
Unpool
8x8
Conv2D
3x3
...
Conv2D
...
Conv2D
3x3
Maxpool
8x8
Input
Fully-connected layers
With drop-out
Input
(3C,1)
(3C8P,2)
(3C8P,3)
(3C8P,4)
Figure 9. Top row: network 8, Bottom row: graph corresponds to network8.
The main idea of the SPDNN method is to mix and merge
these networks and generate a single model which includes all
the layers of the original models in order to be able to preserve
the details and also detect the bigger objects in the scene for
the depth estimation task.
(30F,5)
(3C,7)
(330F,6)
Output
3) The SPDNN Parallelization Methodology
a)
Graph Contraction
A consideration while parallelizing neural networks is that
having the same structure of layers with the same distance
from the input, might lead all the layers to converge to similar
values. For example the first layer in all of the networks
7
shown in Fig. 2 – Fig. 9 is a 2D convolutional layer with a
3×3 kernel.
The SPDNN idea uses graph contraction to merge several
neural networks. The first step is to turn each network into a
graph in which it is necessary to consider each layer of the
network as a node in the graph. Each graph starts with the
input node and ends with output node. The nodes in the graph
are connected based on the connections in the corresponding
layer of the network. Note that the pooling and un-pooling
layers are not represented as nodes in the graph, but their
properties will stay with the graph labels, which will be
explained later.
(3C,1)
(3C,2)
(3C,4)
(3C,5)
(3C,6)
(3C,7)
(3C,8)
F
J
N
P
R
S
(3C2P,2)
(3C2P,3)
(3C2P,4)
(3C,5)
(3C,6)
(3C,7)
(3C,8)
C
G
K
N
P
R
S
A
input
(3C,3)
B
A
(3C,1)
Fig. 2 – Fig. 9 presents the networks and their
corresponding compressed graphs. Two properties are
assigned to each node in the graph. The first property is the
layer structure, and the second one is the distance of the
current node to the input node. To convert the network into a
graph, a labelling scheme is required. The proposed labelling
scheme uses different signs for different layer structures, C for
convolutional layer (for example 3C mean a convolutional
layer with 3×3 kernel), F for fully connected layer (for
example 30F means a fully connected layer with 30 neurons)
and P for pooling property (for example 4P means that the
data has been pooled by the factor of 4 in this layer).
(3C,1)
(3C4P,2)
(3C4P,3)
(3C4P,4)
(3C,5)
(3C,6)
(3C,7)
(3C,8)
A
D
H
L
N
P
R
S
(3C,1)
(3C8P,2)
(3C8P,3)
(3C8P,4)
(3C,5)
(3C,6)
(3C,7)
(3C,8)
A
E
I
M
N
P
R
S
(3C,1)
(3C,2)
(3C,3)
(3C,4)
A
B
F
J
(3C,1)
(3C2P,2)
(3C2P,3)
(3C2P,4)
A
C
G
K
(3C,1)
(3C4P,2)
A
(3C,7)
(30F,5) (330F,6)
T
Q
O
(30F,5) (330F,6)
(3C4P,4)
H
L
(3C,7)
Q
O
(3C4P,3)
D
output
T
(3C,7)
(30F,5) (330F,6)
O
(3C,1)
(3C8P,2)
(3C8P,3)
(3C8P,4)
A
E
I
M
T
Q
(3C,7)
(30F,5) (330F,6)
O
Q
T
Figure 10. Parallelized version of the graphs shown in Fig. 2 – Fig. 9 sharing a single input node and single output node
(3C)
(3C)
(3C)
B
F
J
(3C2P)
input
(3C)
A
(3C2P)
(3C2P)
G
K
(3C4P)
(3C4P)
(3C4P)
D
H
L
C
(3C8P)
(3C8P)
(3C8P)
E
I
M
(3C)
(3C)
(3C)
(3C)
N
P
R
S
(30F)
(330F)
O
Q
output
(3C)
T
Figure 11. Contracted version of the big graph shown in Fig. 10
Some properties, like convolutional and fully connected
layers, occur in a specific node, but pooling and un-pooling
operations will stick with the data to the next layers. The
pooling property stays with the data except when an unpooling or a fully connected layer is reached. For example, a
node with the label (3C8P, 4) corresponds to a convolutional
layer with a 3×3 kernel, the 8P portion of this label indicates
that the data has undergone 8×8 pooling and the 4 at the end
indicates that this label is at a distance of 4 from the input
layer. The corresponding graphs, with assigned labels for each
network, are illustrated in Fig. 2 – Fig. 9.
The next step is to put all these graphs in a parallel format
sharing a single input and single output node. Fig. 10 shows
the graph in this step.
8
In order to merge layers with the same structure and the
same distance from the input node, nodes with the exact same
properties are labelled with the same letters. For example, all
the nodes with properties (3C, 1) are labelled with letter A,
and all the nodes with the properties (3C2P, 4) are labelled K,
and so on.
The next step is to apply graph contraction on the parallelized
graph. In the graph contraction procedure, the nodes with the
same label are merged to a single node while saving their
connections to the previous/next nodes. For instance, all the
nodes with label A are merged into one node, but its
connection to the input node and also nodes B, C, D and E are
preserved. The contracted version of the graph in Fig. 10 is
shown in Fig. 11.
Afterwards, the graph has to be converted back to the neural
network structure. In order to do this process, the preserved
structural properties of each node are used. For example node
C is a 3×3 convolutional layer which has experienced a
pooling operation. Note that the pooling quality will be
recalled from the original network.
The concatenation layer is used in the neural network in order
to implement the nodes wherein several other nodes lead to
one node. For example, in nodes N and O the outputs of nodes
Figure 13. The converted network from graph shown in Fig. 11
J, K, L and M are concatenated with the pooling qualities
taken from their original networks.
b)
The Combined Model/Architecture
In the final model presented in Fig. 13, the input image is
first processed in four, parallel fully convolutional subnetworks with different pooling sizes. This provides the
advantages of different networks with different pooling sizes
at the same time. The outputs of these four sub-networks are
concatenated in two different forms; one to pool the larger
images to be the same size as the smallest image in the
previous part, and the other one is to un-pool the smaller
images of the previous part to be the same size as the largest
image.
After merging these outputs, the data is led to 2 different
networks. One is the fully convolutional network to deepen
the learning and release more abstract features of the input,
and the other network is an auto-encoder network with
different architecture for encoder and decoder.
As previously mentioned, having a fully connected layer in
the network is crucial for the reasonable estimation of the
image’s depth which is provided in the bottleneck of the auto
encoder. The results from the auto encoder and the fully
convolutional sub-network are again merged in order to give a
single output after applying a one channel convolutional layer.
In order to regularize the network, prevent overfitting and
increase the convergence, batch normalization [21] is applied
after every convolutional layer, and the drop-out technique
[20] is used in fully connected layers. The experiments in this
paper show that using weight regularization in the fully
connected layers gives slower convergence; therefore, this
regularization was eliminated from the final design. All the
nonlinearities in the network are the ReLU non linearity,
which is widely used in deep neural networks, except the
output layer, which took advantage of the sigmoid
nonlinearity. The value repeating technique was used in the
un-pooling layer due to non-specificity of the corresponding
pooled layer in the decoder part of the auto-encoder subnetwork.
The value repeating technique, illustrated in Fig. 12, involves
repeating the value from the previous layer in order to obtain
the un-pooled image. The figure shows the 2×2 un-pooling,
and the process is the same for other un-pooling sizes.
4) SPDNN: How it Works and why it is Effective?
One might ask why the SPDNN approach is effective and
what the difference is between this approach and other mixing
approaches. Here the model designed by the SPDNN scheme
is investigated in the forward and back propagation steps. The
key component is in the back-propagation step where the
parameters in parallel layers influence each other. These two
steps are described below:
Forward propagation: Consider the network designed by the
SPDNN approach shown in Fig. 14. This exemplar network is
made of five sub-networks. Just the general view of the
network is shown in this figure and the layers’ details are
ignored since the main goal is to show the information flow
within the whole network.
When the input samples are fed into the network, the data
travels through the network along three different paths shown
in Fig. 15.
9
1
5
5
1 1
2 2
5
9
5
2 2
9
9
1
1 5
2 9
Unpool
2x2
shortcomings by reducing the final mixed error value. In the
voting approach, different classifiers are trained independently
of each other and they do not communicate to reduce their
total error value.
9
a)
Figure 12. Repeating technique used in un-pooling layers.
Sub-Net
1
Sub-Net
3
Input
Sub-Net
5
Sub-Net
2
Output
1.
Sub-Net
4
Figure 14. A network designed using the SPDNN approach. It contains 5 subnetworks placed in parallel and semi-parallel form.
path1
Input
path2
path3
Sub-Net
1
Sub-Net
3
Sub-Net
5
Sub-Net
2
Error
Output
Input
path2
path3
Sub-Net
1
3.
Sub-Net
3
Sub-Net
5
Sub-Net
2
2.
Sub-Net
4
Figure 15. Forward propagation inside the SPDNN. There are three different
paths on which the information can flow inside the network
path1
SPDNN vs Inception
One of the approaches that has superficial similarities to
SPDNN is the Inception technique [25]. For clarity, and to aid
the reader in understanding, the authors list four significant
points of difference between SPDNN and Inception with
regard to mixing networks.
Output
Error
Sub-Net
4
Figure 16. Back propagation for SPDNN. The mixed error is back propagated
throughout the network while updating parameters.
At this stage the parallel networks are blind to each other, i.e.,
the networks placed in parallel do not share any information
with each other. As shown in Fig. 15 the data traveling in SubNet 1 and Sub-Net 2 are not influenced by each other since
they do not share any path together, as in Sub-Net 3 and SubNet 4.
Back propagation: while training the network, the loss
function calculated based on the error value at the output of
the neural network is a mixed and merged function of the error
value corresponding to every data path in the network. In the
backpropagation step the parameters inside the network update
based on this mixed loss values. i.e., this value backpropagates throughout the whole network as it is shown in Fig.
16. Therefore, at this stage of training, each subnetwork is
influenced by the error value from every data path shown in
Fig. 16. This illustrates the way each subnetwork is trained to
reduce the error of its own path and also the error from the
mixture of all paths.
The main difference between the SPDNN approach and other
mixing approaches, like the voting approach, lies in the back
propagation step where different sub-nets are influenced by
the error of each other and try to compensate for each other’s
4.
The main idea in SPDNN is to maintain the overall
structure of the networks, but to mix them in a
reasonable way. For example, if there is a big kernel
such as 13x13 in one of the configurations, the
SPDNN method always preserves the structure
(13x13 kernel) inside the final network. This
contrasts with inception [25], which reduces larger
kernels into smaller ones.
In the inception method, all the layers are merged
into one final layer, which does not happen with the
SPDNN approach.
The number of the layers in the SPDNN architecture
is less than or equal to the number of the layers in the
original networks. In contrast, the inception idea aims
to increase the number of layers in the network by (it
breaks down each layer into several layers with
smaller kernels).
The SPDNN idea is to design a new network from
existing networks that perform well at some task or
subtask while the idea in inception is to design a
network from scratch.
B. Database
In this paper, the KITTI Stereo 2012, 2015 datasets [26] are
used for training and evaluation of the network. The database
is augmented by vertical and horizontal flipping to expand the
total size to 33,096 images. 70% of this dataset is used for
training, 20% for validation and 10% for testing. Each model
is trained for two sets of input samples and two sets of output
targets. The input and target preparation are explained in the
following sections.
1) Data Preparation
a)
Input Preparation
Two different sets have been used as the input of the
network. The first set includes the visible images given by the
left camera. The second set is the visible image + the semantic
segmentation of the corresponding input. This gives the
opportunity of investigating the segmentation influence on the
depth estimation problem. The segmentation map for each
image is calculated by employing the well-known model
“SegNet” [27, 28]. This model is one of the most successful
recent implementations of DNN for semantic pixel-wise image
segmentation and has surpassed other configurations of Fully
10
b)
Target Preparation
The targets for training the network are generated from the
stereo information using the Adaptive Random Walk with
Restart algorithm [31]. The output of the stereo matching
algorithm suffers from several artefacts which are addressed
and solved by a post-processing method in [24]. In the present
experiments, both depth maps (before post-processing and
after post-processing) are used independently as targets. The
post processing procedure is based on the mutual information
of the RGB image (used as a reference image) and the initial
estimated depth image. This approach has been used to
increase the accuracy of the depth estimation in stereo vision
by preserving the edges and corners in the depth map and
filling in the missing parts. The method was compared with
the top 8 depth estimation methods in the Middlebury
benchmark [10] at the time the paper was authored. Seven
metrics, including Mean Square Error (MSE), Root Mean
Square Error (RMSE), Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR),
Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR), Mean Absolute Error (MAE),
Structural Similarity Index (SSIM) and Structural
Dissimilarity Index (DSSIM) were used to evaluate the
performance of each method. The evaluation ranked the
method as 1st in 5 metrics and 2nd and 3rd in other metrics.
C. Training
As described in sections 2.2.1.1 and 2.2.1.2 there are two
separate sets as input and two separate sets as targets for the
training process. This will give four experiments in total as
follows:
1. Experiment 1: Input: Left Visible Image + Pixel-wise
Segmented Image. Target: Post-Processed Depth map.
2. Experiment 2: Input: Left Visible Image. Target: PostProcessed Depth map.
3. Experiment 3: Input: Left Visible Image + Pixel-wise
Segmented Image. Target: Depth map.
4. Experiment 4: Input: Left Visible Image. Target: Depth
map.
The images are resized to 80×264 pixels during the whole
process. Training is done on a standard desktop with an
NVIDIA GTX 1080 GPU with 8GB memory.
In the presented experiments, the mean square error value
between the output of the network and the target values have
been used as the loss function, and the Nestrov momentum
technique [32] with learning rate 0.01 and momentum 0.9 has
been used to train the network. The Training and Validation
Loss for each of these experiments are shown in Fig. 17 and
Train Loss for four different experiments
0.1
Experiment 1
0.09
Experiment 2
0.08
Experiment 4
Experiment 3
0.07
Mean Square Error
Convolutional Networks (FCN) both in accuracy and
simplicity of implementation. SegNet uses the convolutional
layers of the VGG16 network as the encoder of the network
and eliminates the fully connected layers, thus reducing the
number of trainable parameters from 134M to 14.7M, which
represents a reduction of 90% in the number of parameters to
be trained. The encoder portion of SegNet consists of 13
convolutional layers with ReLU nonlinearity followed by
max-pooling (2×2 window) and stride 2 in order to implement
a non-overlapping sliding window. This consecutive maxpooling and striding results in a network configuration that is
highly robust to translation in the input image but has the
drawback of losing spatial resolution of the data.
This loss of spatial resolution is not beneficial in
segmentation tasks where it is necessary to preserve the
boundaries from the input image in the segmented output. To
overcome this problem, the following solution is given in [27].
As most of the spatial resolution information is lost in the
max-pooling operation, saving the information of the maxpooling indices and using this information in the decoder part
of the network preserves the high frequency information.
Note that for each layer in the encoder portion of the
network there is a corresponding decoder layer. The idea of
SegNet is that wherever max-pooling is applied to the input
data, the index of the feature with the maximum value is
preserved. Later these indices will be employed to make a
sparse feature space before the de-convolution step, applying
the un-pooling step in the decoder part. A batch normalization
layer [21] is placed after each convolutional layer to avoid
overfitting and to promote faster convergence. Decoder filter
banks are not tied to corresponding encoder filters and are
trained independently in the SegNet architecture.
In our experiments, SegNet was trained using Stochastic
Gradient Descent (SGD) with learning rate 0.1 and momentum
0.9. In this paper, the Caffe implementation of SegNet has
been employed for training purposes [29]. The gray-scale
CamVid road scene database (360×480) [30] has been used in
the training step.
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0
500
1000
Epoches
Figure 17. Train Loss for each experiment
1500
11
Validation Loss for four different experiments
0.065
Experiment 1
0.06
Experiment 2
Experiment 3
0.055
Experiment 4
Mean Square Error
0.05
0.045
0.04
0.035
0.03
0.025
500
0
1000
1500
Epoches
Figure 18. Validation Loss for each experiment
Fig. 18 respectively. These figures show that using the PostProcessed Depth map as the target results in lower loss values,
which means that the network was able to learn better features
in those experiments, while semantic segmentation decreases
the error only marginally.
III.
RESULTS AND EVALUATIONS
The evaluation in this paper has been done in 3 parts. In the
first two parts, the four experiments given in section 2.3 are
compared to each other given different ground truths, and the
last part compares the proposed method to a stereo matching
method. For evaluation purposes, 8 metrics including PSNR,
MSE (between 0 and 1), RMSE (between 0 and 1), SNR,
MAE (between 0 and 1), Structural Similarity Index
(SSIM)(between 0 and 1) [33], Universal Quality Index (UQI)
(between 0 and 1) [34] and Pearson Correlation Coefficient
(PCC) (between -1 and 1) [35] are used. For the metrics
PSNR, SNR, SSIM, UQI, and PCC the larger value indicates
better performance, and for MSE, RMSE and MAE, the lower
value indicates better performance. PSNR, MSE, RMSE,
MAE and SNR represent the general similarities between two
objects. UQI and SSIM are structural similarity indicators and
PCC represents the correlation between two samples. To the
best of our knowledge there have been no other attempts at
estimating depth from a mono camera on the KITTI
benchmark.
TABLE II. NUMERICAL COMPARISON OF THE MODELS GIVEN THE
BENCHMARK’S GROUND TRUTH
Experiment
Experiment
Experiment
Experiment
1
2
3
4
PSNR
13.7677
13.8333
13.8179
14.3424
MSE
0.0436
0.0435
0.0439
0.0382
RMSE
0.2069
0.206
0.2066
0.1937
SNR
4.4026
3.8279
6.1798
6.1952
MAE
0.1212
0.1236
0.1234
0.1107
SSIM
0.9955
0.9955
0.9955
0.9959
UQI
0.9234
0.9053
0.9064
0.9252
PCC
0.7687
0.7702
0.7729
0.8485
A. Comparing Experiments Given Benchmark Ground Truth
The KITTI database came with a depth map ground truth
generated by a LIDAR scanner. The test set has been forward
propagated through the four different models trained in the
four experiments, and the output of the networks has been
compared to the benchmark ground truth. The results are
shown in Table II.
The best value for each metric is presented in bold. Fig. 19 –
Fig. 21 represent the color coded depth maps computed by the
trained models using the proposed DNN, where the dark red
and dark blue parts represent closest and furthest points to the
camera respectively. On the top right of each figure, the
ground truth given by the benchmark is illustrated. For
visualization purposes, all of the images presented in this
section are upsampled using Joint Bilateral Upsampling [36].
The results show that using semantic segmentation along with
the visible image as input will improve the model marginally.
Using the post-processed target in the training stage helps the
model to converge to more realistic results. As it is illustrated
in Fig. 19 – Fig. 21, the depth map generated in experiment 1
contains more structural details, and more precise, less faulty
depth levels compared with the other experiments. In general,
the presented models in this paper are able to handle
occlusions and discontinuities on different depth levels.
RGB Reference Frame
Ground Truth
Model 1 (Experiment 1)
Model 2 (Experiment 2)
Model 3 (Experiment 3)
Model 4 (Experiment 4)
Figure19. Estimated Depth Maps from the Trained Models – Example 1
RGB Reference Frame
Ground Truth
Model 1 (Experiment 1)
Model 2 (Experiment 2)
Model 3 (Experiment 3)
Model 4 (Experiment 4)
Figure 20. Estimated Depth Maps from the Trained Models – Example 2
RGB Reference Frame
Ground Truth
Model 1 (Experiment 1)
Model 2 (Experiment 2)
Model 3 (Experiment 3)
Model 4 (Experiment 4)
12
Figure 21. Estimated Depth Maps from the Trained Models – Example 3
B. Comparing Experiments Given the Ground Truth from
Stereo Matching
In this section, proposed models are compared to see which
one produces closer results to the target value. This gives an
idea whether using deep learning techniques on the mono
camera can produce reasonable results or not. Images in the
test set have been forward propagated through the models
trained in section 2.3, and the outputs are compared with the
depth map generated by [24]. The numerical results are shown
in Table III.
The best value for each metric is presented in bold. Fig. 22 –
Fig. 24 represent the color coded depth maps computed by the
trained models using the proposed DNN, where the dark red
and dark blue parts represent closest and furthest points to the
camera respectively. On the top right of each figure, the
ground truth calculated by [24] is illustrated. For visualization
purposes, all of the images presented in this section are
upsampled using Joint Bilateral Upsampling [36]. The results
show that using semantic segmentation along with the visible
image as input will improve the model marginally. Using the
post-processed target in the training stage helps the model to
converge to more realistic results. Fig. 22 – Fig. 24 indicate
that the trained models in this paper are able to estimate depth
maps comparable to state-of-the-art stereo matching with
structural accuracy and precise depth levels. This is also a
result of using the semantic segmentation data and injecting
the structural information into the network.
TABLE III. NUMERICAL COMPARISON OF THE MODELS –
EXPERIMENT 2
Experiment
Experiment
Experiment
Experiment
1
2
3
4
PSNR
14.1895
13.3819
14.0491
15.0418
MSE
0.0447
0.0535
0.0441
0.0378
RMSE
0.203
0.2223
0.2039
0.1854
SNR
7.9696
5.4271
6.0943
8.822
MAE
0.1581
0.1673
0.153
0.1442
SSIM
0.9943
0.994
0.9951
0.9952
UQI
0.8369
0.7951
0.8178
0.8401
PCC
0.795
0.704
0.6919
0.8082
RGB Reference Frame
Ground Truth Computed by Stereo
Matching
Model 1 (Experiment 1)
Model 2 (Experiment 2)
Model 3 (Experiment 3)
Model 4 (Experiment 4)
Figure 22. Estimated Depth Maps from the Trained Models – Example 1
RGB Reference Frame
Ground Truth Computed by Stereo
Matching
Model 1 (Experiment 1)
Model 2 (Experiment 2)
Model 3 (Experiment 3)
Model 4 (Experiment 4)
Figure 23. Estimated Depth Maps from the Trained Models – Example 2
RGB Reference Frame
Ground Truth Computed by Stereo
Matching
Model 1 (Experiment 1)
Model 2 (Experiment 2)
Model 3 (Experiment 3)
Model 4 (Experiment 4)
Figure 24. Estimated Depth Maps from the Trained Models – Example 3
C. Comparing Mono Camera Results with Stereo Matching
In this section the results from the mono camera depth
estimation given by the proposed method is compared with
one of the top ranked stereo matching methods given in [24].
The ground truth for this comparison is the set of depth maps
provided by the KITTI benchmark.
The test images have been forward propagated through the
models trained in section 2.3 and the best results are compared
with the stereo matching technique. The results are shown in
Table IV.
The results indicate that using mono camera images and deep
learning techniques can provide results which are comparable
to stereo matching techniques. As shown in Table IV, the
mono camera DNN method was able to provide depth maps
similar to the stereo matching methods, represented by PSNR,
MSE, MAE, RMSE and SNR.
TABLE IV. NUMERICAL COMPARISON BETWEEN STEREO
MATCHING AND THE PROPOSED MONO CAMERA MODEL
Stereo Matching [24] Mono Camera DNN
PSNR
14.8234
14.3424
MSE
0.0351
0.0382
RMSE
0.1845
0.1937
SNR
4.8836
4.4026
MAE
0.1017
0.1107
SSIM
0.9966
0.9959
UQI
0.9353
0.9234
PCC
0.823
0.7687
13
Calculation Time Comparison (logarithmic scale)
2
1
0
M
es
h
P
A Ste MS
PA re
C
P- oE [1
St xt 0]
er [9
eo ]
M
C
[
M -CN N 10
T ]
C
-C N- DE
N ac
[
N
+R rt [ 11]
M
1
C
C SN BS 6]
N
N P-R [17
_L
S ]
M ay M
C o
-C ut [10
N [1 ]
N 0
-fs ]
t[
1
LP 6]
M
U
es M [1
SO hS DP 0]
U tere [13
4P o
]
-n [9
et ]
[1
0
I
G NT ]
C S
SV [1
R 2]
[
JM 10]
R
LC [10
TM U ]
A [10
P ]
[1
Pr
S
op
PS 8]
os
[
ed ID 10]
M R[
et
1
ho 9]
d
log10(Time/MP (s))
3
Methods
Figure 25. Comparison of computational time in logarithmic scale
Having close values for SSIM (0.9966 and 0.9959 in the range
[0,1]) and UQI (0.9353 and 0.9234 in the range [0,1]) shows
how the mono camera DNN method is able to preserve the
structural information, as compared to the Stereo Matching
method.
D. Comparing Running Times
In this section the computational time of the proposed method
is compared against the stereo matching methods provided in
Table I. The evaluations indicate that the proposed method is
able to perform at a rate of ~1.23 sec/MP on a desktop
computer equipped with i7 2600 CPU @ 3.4 GHz and 16GB
of RAM.
Fig. 25 shows the comparison of the computational times. The
comparison is done in a logarithmic scale due to the large
range of computational times between different methods.
IV. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION
In this paper we have introduced the use of the Semi Parallel
Deep Neural Networks (SPDNN) method. An SPDNN is a
semi-parallel network topology developed using a graph
theory optimization of a set of independently optimized
CNNs, each targeted at a specific aspect of the more general
classification problem. For depth estimation from a monocular
set up, a model including fully-connected topology optimized
for fine features is combined with a series of max-pooled
topologies. The optimized SPDNN topology is re-trained on
the full training dataset and converges to an improved set of
network weights. Here we used this design strategy to train an
accurate model for estimating depth from monocular images.
In this work, 8 different deep neural networks have been
mixed and merged using the SPDNN method in order to take
advantage of each network’s qualities. The mixed network
architecture was then trained in four separate scenarios
wherein each scenario uses a different set of inputs and targets
during training. Four distinct models have been trained. The
pixel-wise segmentation and depth estimations given in [24]
were used to provide samples for use in the training stage. The
KITTI benchmark was used for training and experimental
purposes.
Each model was evaluated in two sections, first against the
ground truth provided by the benchmark, and secondly against
the disparity maps computed by the stereo matching method
(section 3.1 and 3.2). The results show that using the postprocessed depth map presented in [24] for training the network
results in more precise models, and adding the semantic
segmentation of the input frame to the input helps the network
preserve the structural information in the output depth map.
The results in section 3.2 show how close the proposed depth
estimation using mono camera can be to the stereo matching
method. The semantic segmentation information helps the
network converge to the stereo matching results, although the
improvement is marginal in this case. The results of the third
comparisons in section 3.3 show a slightly higher accuracy
obtained by employing the stereo matching technique, but our
results demonstrate that there is not a big difference between
the depths from the models trained by proposed DNN and the
values computed by stereo matching. The numerical results for
this evaluation show the similarity between the mono camera
using DNN method and the stereo matching method, and also
the power of the presented method in preserving the structural
information in the output depth map.
An important advantage of these models is the processing time
of ~1.23 sec/MP. This is equal to 38 fps for an input image of
size (80×264) on an i7 2600 CPU @ 3.4 GHz and 16GB of
RAM. This makes the model suitable for providing depth
estimation in real time. This performance is comparable to the
stereo methods MC-CNN-fst [16] and JMR [10], which are 37
fps and 4 fps respectively for the same size of image, taking
advantage of GPU computation power (NVIDIA GTX TITAN
X and GTX 980 respectively). The IDR method [19] can give
up to 131 fps for the same image size by using an NVIDIA
GeForce TITAN Black GPU and CUDA C++ implementation,
but the performance on CPU is not given by the authors, so
any comparisons with this method would be unfair.
Using pixel-wise segmentation as one of the inputs of the
network slightly increased the accuracy of the models, and
also helped the model preserve the structural details of the
input image. However, it also brought some artefacts, such as
wrong depth patches on the surfaces. The evaluation results
also illustrate the higher accuracy of the models where a postprocessed depth map was used as the target in the training
procedure.
A. Future Works and Improvements
The model presented in this work is still a big model to
implement in low power consumer electronic devices (e.g.,
hand held devices). Future work will include a smaller design
which is able to perform as well as the presented model. The
other consideration for the current method is the training data
size (which is always the biggest consideration with deep
learning approaches). The amount of stereo data available in
the databases is usually not big enough to train a deep neural
network. The augmentation techniques can help to expand
databases, but the amount of extra information they provide is
limited. Providing a larger set with accurate depth maps will
improve the results significantly.
The SPDNN approach is currently being to other problems
and is giving promising results on both classification and
regression problems. Those results will be presented in future
publications.
14
REFERENCE
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
M. Weber, M. Humenberger, and W. Kubinger, "A very fast
census-based stereo matching implementation on a graphics
processing unit," in 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on
Computer Vision Workshops, ICCV Workshops, 2009, pp. 786793.
B. Freedman, A. Shpunt, M. Machline, and Y. Arieli, "Depth
mapping using projected patterns," ed: Google Patents, 2013.
A. Govari, A. C. Altmann, Y. Ephrath, and V. Gliner, "Tissue
depth estimation using gated ultrasound and force measurements,"
ed: Google Patents, 2016.
D. Nair. (Aug 24, 2016). 3D Imaging with NI LabVIEW.
Available: http://www.ni.com/white-paper/14103/en/
C. Niclass, M. Soga, H. Matsubara, and S. Kato, "A 100m-Range
10-Frame/s 340×96-Pixel Time-of-Flight Depth Sensor in 0.18-μm
CMOS," in ESSCIRC (ESSCIRC), 2011 Proceedings of the, 2011,
pp. 107-110.
C. Niclass, K. Ito, M. Soga, H. Matsubara, I. Aoyagi, S. Kato, et
al., "Design and characterization of a 256x64-pixel single-photon
imager in CMOS for a MEMS-based laser scanning time-of-flight
sensor," Optics Express, vol. 20, pp. 11863-11881, 2012/05/21
2012.
D. Scharstein and R. Szeliski, "High-accuracy stereo depth maps
using structured light," in Computer Vision and Pattern
Recognition, 2003. Proceedings. 2003 IEEE Computer Society
Conference on, 2003, pp. I-195-I-202 vol.1.
R. K. Gupta and S.-Y. Cho, "A Correlation-Based Approach for
Real-Time Stereo Matching," in Advances in Visual Computing:
6th International Symposium, ISVC 2010, Las Vegas, NV, USA,
November 29 – December 1, 2010, Proceedings, Part II, G. Bebis,
R. Boyle, B. Parvin, D. Koracin, R. Chung, R. Hammound, et al.,
Eds., ed Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010, pp.
129-138.
C. Zhang, Z. Li, Y. Cheng, R. Cai, H. Chao, and Y. Rui,
"MeshStereo: A Global Stereo Model with Mesh Alignment
Regularization for View Interpolation," in 2015 IEEE
International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2015, pp.
2057-2065.
Middlebury Stereo Evaluation - Version 3. Available:
http://vision.middlebury.edu/stereo/eval3/
K. R. Kim and C. S. Kim, "Adaptive smoothness constraints for
efficient stereo matching using texture and edge information," in
2016 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP),
2016, pp. 3429-3433.
X. Huang, Y. Zhang, and Z. Yue, "Image-Guided Non-Local
Dense Matching with Three-Steps Optimization," ISPRS Ann.
Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., vol. III-3, pp. 67-74,
2016.
A. Li, D. Chen, Y. Liu, and Z. Yuan, "Coordinating Multiple
Disparity Proposals for Stereo Computation," in IEEE Conference
on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas,
USA, 2016, pp. 4022-4030.
M. Shahbazi, G. Sohn, J. Théau, and P. Ménard, "Revisiting
Intrinsic Curves for Efficient Dense Stereo Matching," ISPRS Ann.
Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., vol. III-3, pp. 123130, 2016.
B. Yegnanarayana, Artificial neural networks: PHI Learning Pvt.
Ltd., 2009.
J. Žbontar and Y. LeCun, "Stereo matching by training a
convolutional neural network to compare image patches," J. Mach.
Learn. Res., vol. 17, pp. 2287-2318, 2016.
J. T. Barron and B. Poole, "The Fast Bilateral Solver,"
arXiv:1511.03296, vol. abs/1511.03296, 2016.
E. T. Psota, J. Kowalczuk, M. Mittek, P. L. C, and rez, "MAP
Disparity Estimation Using Hidden Markov Trees," in 2015 IEEE
International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2015, pp.
2219-2227.
J. Kowalczuk, E. T. Psota, and L. C. Perez, "Real-Time Stereo
Matching on CUDA Using an Iterative Refinement Method for
Adaptive Support-Weight Correspondences," IEEE Transactions
on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 23, pp. 94-104,
2013.
N. Srivastava, G. Hinton, A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and R.
Salakhutdinov, "Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
[26]
[27]
[28]
[29]
[30]
[31]
[32]
[33]
[34]
[35]
[36]
from overfitting," J. Mach. Learn. Res., vol. 15, pp. 1929-1958,
2014.
S. Ioffe and C. Szegedy, "Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep
Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift,"
arXiv:1502.03167, vol. abs/1502.03167, 2015.
F. Liu, C. Shen, G. Lin, and I. Reid, "Learning Depth from Single
Monocular Images Using Deep Convolutional Neural Fields,"
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence,
vol. 38, pp. 2024-2039, 2016.
A. Saxena, J. Schulte, and A. Y. Ng, "Depth estimation using
monocular and stereo cues," in Proceedings of the 20th
international joint conference on Artifical intelligence, Hyderabad,
India, 2007, pp. 2197-2203.
H. Javidnia and P. Corcoran, "A Depth Map Post-Processing
Approach Based on Adaptive Random Walk With Restart," IEEE
Access, vol. 4, pp. 5509-5519, 2016.
C. Szegedy, W. Liu, Y. Jia, P. Sermanet, S. Reed, D. Anguelov, et
al., "Going deeper with convolutions," in Proceedings of the IEEE
conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2015, pp.
1-9.
M. Menze and A. Geiger, "Object scene flow for autonomous
vehicles," in 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and
Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2015, pp. 3061-3070.
V. Badrinarayanan, A. Kendall, and R. Cipolla, " SegNet: A Deep
Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Architecture for Image
Segmentation," arXiv:1511.00561, vol. abs/1511.00561, 2015.
A. Kendall, V. Badrinarayanan, and R. Cipolla, "Bayesian segnet:
Model uncertainty in deep convolutional encoder-decoder
architectures for scene understanding," arXiv preprint
arXiv:1511.02680, 2015.
A. Kendall, V. Badrinarayanan, and R. Cipolla. Caffe
Implementation
of
SegNet.
Available:
https://github.com/alexgkendall/caffe-segnet
G. J. Brostow, J. Shotton, J. Fauqueur, and R. Cipolla,
"Segmentation and Recognition Using Structure from Motion
Point Clouds," in Computer Vision – ECCV 2008: 10th European
Conference on Computer Vision, Marseille, France, October 1218, 2008, Proceedings, Part I, D. Forsyth, P. Torr, and A.
Zisserman, Eds., ed Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin
Heidelberg, 2008, pp. 44-57.
S. Lee, J. H. Lee, J. Lim, and I. H. Suh, "Robust stereo matching
using adaptive random walk with restart algorithm," Image and
Vision Computing, vol. 37, pp. 1-11, 2015/05/01/ 2015.
I. Sutskever, J. Martens, G. E. Dahl, and G. E. Hinton, "On the
importance of initialization and momentum in deep learning,"
ICML (3), vol. 28, pp. 1139-1147, 2013.
W. Zhou, A. C. Bovik, H. R. Sheikh, and E. P. Simoncelli, "Image
quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity,"
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 13, pp. 600-612,
2004.
W. Zhou and A. C. Bovik, "A universal image quality index,"
IEEE Signal Processing Letters, vol. 9, pp. 81-84, 2002.
K. Pearson, "Note on regression and inheritance in the case of two
parents," Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, vol. 58, pp.
240-242, 1895.
J. Kopf, M. F. Cohen, D. Lischinski, and M. Uyttendaele, "Joint
bilateral upsampling," ACM Trans. Graph., vol. 26, p. 96, 2007.
| 1cs.CV
|
DeepSentiBank: Visual Sentiment Concept Classification
with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks
Tao Chen1 , Damian Borth2 , Trevor Darrell2 and Shih-Fu Chang1
1
arXiv:1410.8586v1 [cs.CV] 30 Oct 2014
1
Columbia University, USA
{taochen,sfchang}@ee.columbia.edu
ABSTRACT
This paper introduces a visual sentiment concept classification method based on deep convolutional neural networks
(CNNs). The visual sentiment concepts are adjective noun
pairs (ANPs) automatically discovered from the tags of web
photos, and can be utilized as effective statistical cues for
detecting emotions depicted in the images. Nearly one million Flickr images tagged with these ANPs are downloaded
to train the classifiers of the concepts. We adopt the popular
model of deep convolutional neural networks which recently
shows great performance improvement on classifying largescale web-based image dataset such as ImageNet. Our deep
CNNs model is trained based on Caffe, a newly developed
deep learning framework. To deal with the biased training
data which only contains images with strong sentiment and
to prevent overfitting, we initialize the model with the model
weights trained from ImageNet. Performance evaluation
shows the newly trained deep CNNs model SentiBank 2.0
(or called DeepSentiBank) is significantly improved in both
annotation accuracy and retrieval performance, compared to
its predecessors which mainly use binary SVM classification
models.
Categories and Subject Descriptors
H.3.3 [Information Storage and Retrieval]: Information
Retrieval and Indexing
Keywords
deep learning, visual sentiment, affective computing
1.
INTRODUCTION
The explosive growth of social media and online visual
content has motivated the research on large-scale social
multimedia analysis. Among these research efforts, understanding the emotion and sentiment in visual media content
has attracted increasing attention in research and practical
applications.. Images and videos depicting strong sentiments can strengthen the opinion conveyed in the content
and more effectively influence the audience. Understanding
sentiment expressed in visual content will greatly benefit
social media communication and enable broad applications
in education, advertisement and entertainment.
Modeling generic visual concepts (nouns) such as “sky”
and “dog” has been studied extensively in computer vision,
but modeling adjectives correlated with visual sentiments
like “amazing” and “shy” remains difficult, if not impossible, due to the big “affective gap” between the low-level
2
2
University of California, Berkeley, CA
{borth@icsi,trevor@eecs}.berkeley.edu
visual features and the high-level sentiment. Therefore,
Borth et al. [1] proposed a more tractable approach which
models sentiment related visual concepts as a mid-level representation to fill the gap. Those concepts are Adjective
Noun Pairs (ANPs), such as “happy dog” and “beautiful
sky”, which combine the sentimental strength of adjectives
and detectability of nouns. Though these ANP concepts
do not directly express emotions or sentiments, they were
discovered based on strong co-occurrence relationships with
emotion tags of web photos, and thus are useful as effective statistical cues for detecting emotions depicted in the
images. In [1] binary SVM classifiers of the ANPs are
trained on the whole images, denoted as SentiBank 1.1.
Later Chen et al. [2] improve these classifiers by considering
object-based concept localization and leveraging semantic
similarity among the concepts.
The dataset for training the visual sentiment concepts
involves thousands of categories consisting of about one million images downloaded from Flickr. Recently, Krizhevsky
et al. [18] show deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs)
is able to achieve great classification performance improvement and efficiency on similar datasets such as ImageNet [4].
The model has a much larger learning capacity that can
be controlled by varying the network depth and breadth,
compared to SVM and other learning methods. Its strong
assumptions of stationarity of statistics and locality of pixel
dependencies about the nature of images are also mostly
correct. CNNs are also easier to train than standard feedforward neural networks with layers of similar size, since
they have much fewer connections and parameters, with
only slightly degraded theoretic performance. CNNs also
have the capability to incorporate model weights learned
from more general dataset, which can be applied to our
case by transferring the model learned over ImageNet to
the specialized dataset like SentiBank..
This work introduces SentiBank 2.0, or called DeepSentiBank, a visual sentiment concepts classification model
which is trained under Caffe [14, 15], a GPU based deep
learning framework. We adopt similar CNNs architecture
used in [18] while training on the ILSVRC2012 [4] dataset.
We find that initializing the model with the model
weights trained from ImageNet provides much better
performance that training from visual sentiments dataset
alone.
Performance evaluation and comparisons with
its predecessors show the newly trained DeepSentiBank
significantly improves the annotation accuracy in ANP
classification as well as moderately improves the ANP
retrieval performance.
2.
2.1
RELATED WORK
Modeling Sentiment
Most work on sentiment analysis so far has been based on
textual information [36, 8, 32]. Sentiment models have been
demonstrated to be useful in various applications including
human behavior prediction [8], business [26], and political
science [34].
Compared to text-based sentiment analysis, modeling sentiment based on images has been much less studied. The
most relevant work is [1], which proposed to design a largescale visual sentiment ontology based on Adjective-Noun
Pairs (the sentiment modeling is then based on one-vs-all
SVMs). Chen et al. [2] further improve the model by
considering object-based concept localization and leveraging
semantic similarity among the concepts.
2.2
Modeling Visual Concepts
Concept modeling has been widely studied in multimedia
[25, 31], and computer vision (often referred as “attributes”)
[9]. The concepts being modeled are mostly objects [31],
scenes [27], or activities [10]. There is work trying to solve
the “fine grained recognition” task, where the categories are
usually organized in a hierarchical structure. [6, 7, 5]. There
is also work trying to model “non-conventional” concepts
or properties of the images, such as image aesthetic and
quality [16, 22], memorability [12], interestingness [12], and
affection/emotions [21, 35, 13, 21, 35, 37]. The models are
usually trained by SVM and other layer lacking learning
methods.
2.3
Deep Learning
Deep convolutional networks have been long studied in
computer vision. Successful results on digit recognition
using supervised back-propagation networks have been
achieved in early research[20].
More recently, similar
networks are applied on large benchmark datasets consisting
of more than one million images, such as ImageNet [4], with
competition-winning results [18].
The learned deep representations can be transferred across
tasks. It has been extensively studied in an unsupervised
setting [29, 23]. However, such models in convolutional
networks have been limited to relatively small datasets such
as CIFAR and MNIST, and only achieved modest success
in [19]. Sermanet et al. [30] propose to use unsupervised
pre-training, followed by supervised fine-tuning to solve
the problem of insufficient training data. Supervised pretraining approach using a concept-bank paradigm [17, 33]
is also proven successful in computer vision and multimedia
settings. It learns the features on large-scale data in a
supervised setting, then transfers them to different tasks
with different labels. Recently, Girshick et al. [11] shows
that supervised pre-training on a large dataset, followed
by domain-adaptive fine-tuning on smaller dataset is an
efficient paradigm for scarce data.
3.1
The analysis of emotion, affect and sentiment from visual
content has become an exciting area in the multimedia
community allowing to build new applications for brand
monitoring, advertising, and opinion mining. To create an
corpora for sentiment analysis on visual content and stimulate innovative research on this challenging issue, a database
is constructed by Borth et al. [1]. This database contains a
Visual Sentiment Ontology (VSO) consisting of more than
3,000 adjective noun pairs (ANPs), SentiBank1 , a set of
1,200 trained visual concept detectors providing a mid-level
representation of sentiment, and associated training images
acquired from Flickr. Construction of the VSO is founded on
psychological research by data-driven discovery - for each of
the 24 emotions defined in Plutchik’s theory [28], images and
videos are retrieved from Flickr and YouTube respectively
to extract concurrent tags. The set of all adjectives and
all nouns is then used to form ANPs such as “beautiful
flowers” or “sad eyes”. SentiBank is then trained on the
images tagged by these ANPs.
3.2
VISUAL SENTIMENT ONTOLOGY
AND CONCEPTS OVERVIEW
In this section, we briefly review the visual sentiment
ontology construction in [1] and define our classification
problem.
Dataset
The database contains a set of Flickr images for training
and testing ANP classifiers in SentiBank 1.1. For each
ANP, at most 1,000 images tagged with it are downloaded,
resulting about one million images for 3,316 ANPs. To train
the visual sentiment concept or ANP classifiers, we first filter
out the ANPs associated with less than 120 images. 2,089
ANPs with 867,919 images are left after filtering. For each
ANP, 20 images are randomly selected for testing, while
others are used in training, ensuring at least 100 training
images per ANP. To prevent bias in the test set, any training
image and test image pair associated with same ANP must
not share a same publisher on Flickr. The ANP tags from
Flickr users are used as labels for each image. Note those
labels may suffer from incompleteness and noisiness, i.e., not
all true labels are annotated and sometimes there are falsely
assigned labels also. However we do not fix them due to the
huge amount of annotation tasks. We use the labels as is
and thus will refer to them as pseudo ground truth.
We also build a subset to compare the retrieval performance of different models. This subset only contains images
associated with six nouns, namely “car”, “dog”, “dress”,
“face”, “flower” and “food”. These nouns are not only frequently tagged in the social multimedia, but also associated
with diverse adjectives to form a large set of ANPs (135 in
total). Its training set is the corresponding subset of the
full training set. Its test set however, contains 60 manually
annotated images for each ANP, where 20 are positive and 40
are negative. The retrieval performance is evaluated by the
average precision on the ranking result of the 60 test images
for each ANP. For this dataset, we will compare the new
DeepSentiBank with an earlier version of SentiBank using
object-based localization, called SentiBank 1.5R (indicating
region based SentiBank) [2].
4.
3.
Building Ontology
4.1
DEEP CONVOLUTIONAL
NETWORKS SOLUTION
NEURAL
Introduction of Caffe
1
Version 1.1 can be downloaded from
http://visual-sentiment-ontology.appspot.com/.
Figure 1: The architecture of the deep convolutional neural networks.
Caffe is a deep learning framework developed by taking
full account of cleanliness, readability, and speed. It was
created by Jia [14], and is in active development by the
Berkeley Vision and Learning Center (BVLC) and by community contributors. Caffe is released under the BSD 2Clause license 2 .
Using Caffe for deep learning programming has multiple
advantages. Its clean architecture enables rapid deployment.
Networks are specified in simple config files, with no hardcoded parameters in the code. Switching between CPU and
GPU is as simple as setting a flag ĺC so models can be trained
on a GPU machine, and then used on commodity clusters.
4.2
CNN Architecture
Here we describe the overall architecture of the deep convolutional neural networks for training the visual sentiment
concept classification model, SentiBank 2.0 or DeepSentiBank. The architecture mostly follows [18]. As depicted
in Figure 1, the net contains eight main layers (conv or
fc) with weights; the first five are convolutional and the
other three are fully- connected. The output of the last
fully-connected layer is fed to a 2089-way softmax which
produces a distribution over the 2089 class labels. The
network maximizes the average across training instances of
the log-probability of the correct label under the prediction
distribution by multinomial logistic regression. The kernels
of the second, fourth, and fifth convolutional layers are
connected only to half of kernel maps in the previous layer.
The kernels of the third convolutional layer are connected to
all kernel maps in the second layer. The neurons in the fullyconnected layers are connected to all neurons in the previous
layer. Following [24], the Rectified Linear Units (ReLUs)
non-linearity f (x) = max(0, x) is applied to the output of
every convolutional and fully-connected layer. Overlapping
max-pooling layers (pool) follow the first, second and fifth
ReLU layers (relu). The pooling layer consists of a grid
of pooling units spaced 2 pixels apart, each summarizing
a neighborhood of size 3 × 3 centered at the location of
the pooling unit. Local response normalization layers (lm)
2
http://caffe.berkeleyvision.org/
Table 1: The input/output data size (left) and the
layer shape (right) for each layer.
name
input
data
conv1
pool1
norm1
conv2
pool2
norm2
conv3
conv4
conv5
pool5
fc6
fc7
fc8
label
output
size
3 × 256 × 256
3 × 227 × 227
96 × 55 × 55
96 × 27 × 27
96 × 27 × 27
256 × 27 × 27
256 × 13 × 13
256 × 13 × 13
384 × 13 × 13
384 × 13 × 13
256 × 13 × 13
256 × 6 × 6
4096
4096
2089
1
1
name
conv1
conv2
conv3
conv4
conv5
fc6
fc7
fc8
shape
96 × 3 × 11 × 11
256 × 48 × 5 × 5
384 × 256 × 3 × 3
384 × 192 × 3 × 3
256 × 192 × 3 × 3
4096 × 9216
4096 × 4096
2089 × 4096
follow the first and second pooling layers. The responsenormalized activity bix,y is given by the expression
bix,y = aix,y / k + α
min(N −1,i+n/2)
X
β
(aix,y )2
j=max(0,i−n/2)
where aix,y is the activity of a neuron computed by maxpooling, the sum runs over n “adjacent” kernel maps at the
same spatial position, and N is the total number of kernels
in the layer. The constants k = 2, n = 5, α = 10−4 , and
β = 0.75. The dropout layers (dropout) are applied in the
first two fully-connected layers.
The input/output data size and the layer shape for each
layer is shown in Table 1. All training and test images are
first normalized to 256 × 256 without keeping the aspect
ratio. To prevent overfitting, we apply data augmentation consists of generating image translations and horizontal
reflections. We do this by extracting random 227 × 227
patches (and their horizontal reflections) from the 256 × 256
images and training our network on these extracted patches.
The first convolutional layer filters the 227 × 227 × 3 input
image with 96 kernels of size 11 × 11 × 3 with a stride of
4 pixels. The second convolutional layer takes as input
the (pooled and response-normalized) output of the first
convolutional layer and filters it with 256 kernels of size 5 ×
5 × 48. The third, fourth, and fifth convolutional layers are
connected to one another without pooling or normalization.
The third convolutional layer has 384 kernels of size 3 × 3 ×
256 connected to the (normalized and pooled) outputs of the
second convolutional layer. The fourth convolutional layer
has 384 kernels of size 3×3×192 , and the fifth convolutional
layer has 256 kernels of size 3 × 3 × 192. The fully-connected
layers have 4096 neurons each.
4.3
Learning Details
The regression objective is minimized by stochastic gradient descent with a batch size of 256 examples, momentum
of 0.9, and weight decay of 0.0005. The small weight decay
here is not only a regularizer by also reduces the model’s
training error.
Due to insufficient data and the bias to images with
strong sentiment, training on our dataset may suffer from
overfitting. Since our dataset is from the same domain of
ImageNet, it is promising to use fine-tuning. We initialized the weights by the model trained from ILSVRC2012
except the top layer. the pre-trained model can be downloaded from http://caffe.berkeleyvision.org/getting_
pretrained_models.html. The learning rate is initialized
at 0.001. Regarding the full forward-backward pass of each
batch as an iteration, we run a total of 250,000 iterations
(about 77 epochs). We divide learning rate by 10 after every
100,000 iterations (about 20 epochs).
For comparison, we also train a similar model without
fine-tuning. We initialize the weights in each layer from a
zero-mean Gaussian distribution with standard deviation
0.01. We initialize the neuron biases in the second, fourth,
and fifth convolutional layers, as well as in the fullyconnected hidden layers with the constant 0.1, and in the
remaining layers with the constant 0. The learning rate is
initialized at 0.01.
During testing, we center crop the test images into
227 × 227, apply forward propagation with the trained
model weights and use the softmax as predicted probability
of each concept.
5.
5.1
EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
Computation Speed
Our experiment is done on a single server machine with
16-core dual Intel E5-2650L processor, 64GB memory and a
nVidia K20 GPU. The training over 826,806 images takes
about 9 days and testing over 41,780 test images takes
about 6 minutes. The maximum memory used is 42GB,
and storing data takes 300GB disk space.
5.2
Figure 2: The curves of ranked top-10 accuracy per
ANP of different approaches. The curves have been
smoothed.
Performance and Comparisons
We evaluate the new classification model by both annotation accuracy (measured by the percentage of images that
have the pseudo ground truth label in top detected concepts)
and retrieval performance (measured by mean average precision).
5.2.1
Annotation accuracy
The annotation accuracy is evaluated on the full test set
of 2,089 ANPs mentioned in Section 3.2 and measured by
top-k accuracy - the percentage of images that have the
pseudo ground truth label in top k detected concepts. Top1, 5, 10 accuracies of each and all ANPs are computed and
compared among fine-tuned deep CNNs model (SentiBank
2.0), deep CNNs model without fine-tuning, and SentiBank
1.1 [1]. The overall accuracies are listed in Table 2. Different
from genetic visual concepts, some visual sentiment concepts
can be very abstract, such as “terrible crime” and “strong
community”. Such ANPs usually have very low classification
performance, and are meaningless to be included in the
classifiers library for generating mid-level sentiment related
features. Thus it is important to compare the performances
of ANPs with acceptable detectability. Similar to [1], for
each approach, we select top 1,200 ANPs ranked by Top10 accuracy. Note different approach will produce different
ANP subsets. The overall accuracies for these subsets are
also shown in Table 2. Figure 2 shows the curve of ranked
top-10 accuracy per ANP for each subset. According to
the table and the figure it is clear that the CNNs-based
approaches greatly outperform the SVM based approach,
with as much as 370% performance gain on top-1 accuracy,
200% on top-5, and 150% on top-10. Fine-tuned model
is also 14~25% better than the one without fine-tuning.
Figure 3 shows some examples of top detected concepts from
test images by the fine-tuned model. It shows that despite
the serious problem of incomplete and incorrect labels in
our dataset, the top detected concepts can still be accurate.
Since the pseudo ground truth labels may not be correct,
thus the top-5 and top-10 accuracies are more appropriate
than top-1 accuracy. We also realize an important reason
for the performance boost is that the SVM based SentiBank
trains binary classifiers, rather than a general multi-label
classification approach. Such binary classification setting is
more suitable for retrieval, instead of annotation. Thus,
in the next section, we will evaluate the performance of
DeepSentiBank in terms of image retrieval.
5.2.2
Retrieval performance
Figure 3: Examples of top 10 concepts detected from test images by the fine-tuned DeepSentiBank model.
The red concepts are the pseudo ground truth concepts. Credits of images (from top to bottom, from
left to right): ©Mauricio Gelfuso, Bob Wright, fraKara, Melanie Bateman, Photographs-n-Memories, Matt
Swanson, Twan Goossens, S Debras, Erin Nichols, Yael Levine, 7 Years Later... and Anda Stavri of Flickr.
Figure 4: The mean AP for each and all noun
categories for the subset of 135 ANPs mentioned
in Section 3.2.
The retrieval performance is evaluated on the subset of
135 ANPs mentioned in Section 3.2. We apply the models
trained from SentiBank 1.1, 1.5R and DeepSentiBank to
the test set. For each ANP, the test images are ranked
by the estimated probability of the ANP. The performance
is measured by average precision (AP) at top 20. The
mean AP for each and all noun categories are shown in Figure 4. Although not designed for retrieval, DeepSentiBank
still outperforms SentiBank 1.1 by 62.3% and SentiBank
1.5R by 8.9%. Note DeepSentiBank is only trained on
whole images and does not consider concept localization
or concept similarity. It means the performance could be
further improved if we incorporate the two factors into deep
learning. Recently, R-CNN [11] shows state-of-the-art performance on object detection, which can be a promising
candidate approach for the concept localization.
6.
CONCLUSION
This paper presents a visual sentiment concept classification model based on deep convolutional neural networks.
The deep CNNs model is trained based on Caffe, a newly
developed deep learning framework. To deal with the biased
training data which only contains images with strong sentiment and to prevent overfitting, we initialize the model
with the model weights trained from ImageNet. Performance evaluation shows the newly trained deep CNNs model
DeepSentiBank is significantly better in both annotation
and retrieval, compared to previous work using independent
binary SVM classification models. In the future, we will
incorporate the concept localization into the deep CNNs
model, and improve network structure by leveraging concept
relations. The high performance boost will also help to
improve applications built on SentiBank, such as assistive
comment robot [3] and twitter sentiment prediction, or other
applications such as sentiment-aware image editing.
7.
REFERENCES
[1] Damian Borth, Rongrong Ji, Tao Chen, Thomas
Breuel, and Shih-Fu Chang. Large-scale visual
sentiment ontology and detectors using adjective noun
pairs. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM International
Conference on Multimedia. ACM, 2013.
[2] Tao Chen, Felix X. Yu, Jiawei Chen, Yin Cui,
Yan-Ying Chen, and Shih-Fu Chang. Object-based
visual sentiment concept analysis and application. In
Proceedings of the 22nd ACM International
Conference on Multimedia. ACM, 2014.
[3] Yan-Ying Chen, Tao Chen, Winston H. Hsu,
Hong-Yuan Mark Liao, and Shih-Fu Chang. Predicting
viewer affective comments based on image content in
social media. In Proceedings of the International
Conference on Multimedia Retrieval. ACM, 2014.
[4] J Deng, A Berg, S Satheesh, H Su, A Khosla, and
L Fei-Fei. Large scale visual recognition challenge.
www. image-net. org/challenges/LSVRC/2012, 1,
2012.
Table 2: Evaluation of Different SentiBank Models in terms of Retrieval
SentiBank ver.
SentiBank 1.1
DeepSentiBank w/o fine-tuning
DeepSentiBank
Top-1
1.7075%
6.5235%
8.1629%
2,089 ANPs
Top-5
Top-10
6.3211%
10.2917%
16.0095%
22.4941%
19.1132% 26.1012%
[5] J. Deng, W. Dong, R. Socher, L.J. Li, K. Li, and
L. Fei-Fei. ImageNet: A Large-Scale Hierarchical
Image Database. In Computer Vision and Pattern
Recognition, 2009.
[6] Jia Deng, Jonathan Krause, and Li Fei-Fei.
Fine-grained crowdsourcing for fine-grained
recognition. In Computer Vision and Pattern
Recognition (CVPR), 2013 IEEE Conference on,
pages 580–587. IEEE, 2013.
[7] Kun Duan, Devi Parikh, David Crandall, and Kristen
Grauman. Discovering localized attributes for
fine-grained recognition. In Computer Vision and
Pattern Recognition. IEEE, 2012.
[8] Andrea Esuli and Fabrizio Sebastiani. SentiWordNet:
A publicly available lexical resource for opinion
mining. In Proceedings of the Conference on Language
Resources and Evaluation, volume 6, 2006.
[9] V. Ferrari and A. Zisserman. Learning visual
attributes. In Neural Information Processing Systems,
2007.
[10] Yanwei Fu, Timothy M Hospedales, Tao Xiang, and
Shaogang Gong. Attribute learning for understanding
unstructured social activity. In European Conference
on Computer Vision. Springer, 2012.
[11] Ross Girshick, Jeff Donahue, Trevor Darrell, and
Jitendra Malik. Rich feature hierarchies for accurate
object detection and semantic segmentation. In IEEE
CVPR, 2014.
[12] P. Isola, J. Xiao, A. Torralba, and A. Oliva. What
makes an image memorable? In Computer Vision and
Pattern Recognition, 2011.
[13] Jia Jia, Sen Wu, Xiaohui Wang, Peiyun Hu, Lianhong
Cai, and Jie Tang. Can we understand van Gogh’s
mood?: Learning to infer affects from images in social
networks. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM
international conference on Multimedia, pages
857–860. ACM, 2012.
[14] Yangqing Jia. Caffe: An open source convolutional
architecture for fast feature embedding. Available from
http://caffe.berkeleyvision.org/, 2013.
[15] Yangqing Jia, Evan Shelhamer, Jeff Donahue, Sergey
Karayev, Jonathan Long, Ross Girshick, Sergio
Guadarrama, and Trevor Darrell. Caffe: Convolutional
architecture for fast feature embedding. In Proceedings
of the 22nd ACM International Conference on
Multimedia. ACM, 2014.
[16] Dhiraj Joshi, Ritendra Datta, Elena Fedorovskaya,
Quang-Tuan Luong, James Z Wang, Jia Li, and Jiebo
Luo. Aesthetics and emotions in images. Signal
Processing Magazine, IEEE, 28(5):94–115, 2011.
[17] Lyndon Kennedy and Alexander Hauptmann. Lscom
lexicon definitions and annotations (version 1.0). 2006.
Top-1
3.0386%
11.4430%
14.3572%
1,200 ANPs
Top-5
Top-10
11.4288%
18.7356%
28.4856%
39.0800%
33.3726% 44.3664%
[18] Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Geoffrey E.
Hinton. Imagenet classification with deep
convolutional neural networks. In F. Pereira, C.J.C.
Burges, L. Bottou, and K.Q. Weinberger, editors,
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
25, pages 1097–1105. Curran Associates, Inc., 2012.
[19] Quoc V Le. Building high-level features using large
scale unsupervised learning. In Acoustics, Speech and
Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2013 IEEE International
Conference on, pages 8595–8598. IEEE, 2013.
[20] Yann LeCun, Bernhard Boser, John S Denker, Donnie
Henderson, Richard E Howard, Wayne Hubbard, and
Lawrence D Jackel. Backpropagation applied to
handwritten zip code recognition. Neural computation,
1(4):541–551, 1989.
[21] J. Machajdik and A. Hanbury. Affective image
classification using features inspired by psychology
and art theory. In Proceedings of ACM Multimedia,
pages 83–92, 2010.
[22] L. Marchesotti, F. Perronnin, D. Larlus, and
G. Csurka. Assessing the aesthetic quality of
photographs using generic image descriptors. In
Proceedings of the International Conference on
Computer Vision, 2011.
[23] Grégoire Mesnil, Yann Dauphin, Xavier Glorot, Salah
Rifai, Yoshua Bengio, Ian J Goodfellow, Erick Lavoie,
Xavier Muller, Guillaume Desjardins, David
Warde-Farley, et al. Unsupervised and transfer
learning challenge: a deep learning approach. In ICML
Unsupervised and Transfer Learning, pages 97–110,
2012.
[24] Vinod Nair and Geoffrey E Hinton. Rectified linear
units improve restricted boltzmann machines. In
Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on
Machine Learning (ICML-10), pages 807–814, 2010.
[25] M. Naphade, J. Smith, J. Tesic, S.-F. Chang, W. Hsu,
L. Kennedy, A. Hauptmann, and Curtis J. Large-scale
concept ontology for multimedia. In IEEE Multimedia,
2006.
[26] Bo Pang and Lillian Lee. Opinion mining and
sentiment analysis. Information Retrieval,
2(1-2):1–135, 2008.
[27] Genevieve Patterson and James Hays. Sun attribute
database: Discovering, annotating, and recognizing
scene attributes. In Computer Vision and Pattern
Recognition. IEEE, 2012.
[28] Robert Plutchik. Emotion: A Psychoevolutionary
Synthesis. Harper & Row, Publishers, 1980.
[29] Rajat Raina, Alexis Battle, Honglak Lee, Benjamin
Packer, and Andrew Y Ng. Self-taught learning:
transfer learning from unlabeled data. In Proceedings
[30]
[31]
[32]
[33]
[34]
[35]
[36]
[37]
of the 24th international conference on Machine
learning, pages 759–766. ACM, 2007.
Pierre Sermanet, Koray Kavukcuoglu, Soumith
Chintala, and Yann LeCun. Pedestrian detection with
unsupervised multi-stage feature learning. In
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR),
2013 IEEE Conference on, pages 3626–3633. IEEE,
2013.
J.R. Smith, M. Naphade, and A. Natsev. Multimedia
semantic indexing using model vectors. In
International Conference on Multimedia and Expo,
2003.
Mike Thelwall, Kevan Buckley, Georgios Paltoglou,
Di Cai, and Arvid Kappas. Sentiment strength
detection in short informal text. Journal of the
American Society for Information Science and
Technology, 61(12):2544–2558, 2010.
Lorenzo Torresani, Martin Szummer, and Andrew
Fitzgibbon. Efficient object category recognition using
classemes. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2010, pages
776–789. Springer, 2010.
Andranik Tumasjan, Timm O Sprenger, Philipp G
Sandner, and Isabell M Welpe. Predicting elections
with Twitter: What 140 characters reveal about
political sentiment. In Proceedings of the 4th
International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social
Media, 2010.
Weining Wang and Qianhua He. A survey on
emotional semantic image retrieval. In Image
Processing, 2008. ICIP 2008. 15th IEEE International
Conference on, pages 117–120. IEEE, 2008.
Theresa Wilson, Janyce Wiebe, and Paul Hoffmann.
Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level
sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the Conference
on Human Language Technology and Empirical
Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2005.
V. Yanulevskaya, J. van Gemert, K. Roth,
A. Herbold, N. Sebe, and J.M. Geusebroek. Emotional
valence categorization using holistic image features. In
Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on
Image Processing, pages 101–104, 2008.
| 9cs.NE
|
A Compressive Sensing Approach to Community Detection
with Applications
Ming-Jun Lai∗
Daniel Mckenzie
†
arXiv:1708.09477v2 [cs.IT] 22 Sep 2017
September 25, 2017
Abstract
The community detection problem for graphs asks one to partition the n vertices V of a
graph G into k communities, or clusters, such that there are many intracluster edges and few
intercluster edges. Of course this is equivalent to finding a permutation matrix P such that, if
A denotes the adjacency matrix of G, then PAP> is approximately block diagonal. As there
are k n possible partitions of n vertices into k subsets, directly determining the optimal clustering
is clearly infeasible. Instead one seeks to solve a more tractable approximation to the clustering
problem. In this paper we reformulate the community detection problem via sparse solution of a
linear system associated with the Laplacian of a graph G and then develop a two-stage approach
based on a thresholding technique and a compressive sensing algorithm to find a sparse solution
which corresponds to the community containing a vertex of interest in G. Crucially, our approach
results in an algorithm which is able to find a single cluster of size n0 in O(n ln(n)n0 ) operations
and all k clusters in fewer than O(n2 ln(n)) operations. This is a marked improvement over the
classic spectral clustering algorithm, which is unable to find a single cluster at a time and takes
approximately O(n3 ) operations to find all k clusters. Moreover, we are able to provide robust
guarantees of success for the case where G is drawn at random from the Stochastic Block Model,
a popular model for graphs with clusters. Extensive numerical results are also provided, showing
the efficacy of our algorithm on both synthetic and real-world data sets.
1
Introduction
The clustering problem for a graph G = (V, E) is to divide the vertex set V into subsets V =
C1 ∪ . . . ∪ Ck such that there are many intracluster edges (edges between vertices in the same cluster)
and few intercluster edges (edges between vertices in different clusters) in E. This is a widely studied
problem in exploratory data analysis, as one can reasonably assume that vertices in the same cluster
a ‘similar’, in some sense. We refer the reader to the survey article [20] for further details and a
thorough overview of existing algorithmic approaches. We note that [20] refers to the clustering
problem as the community detection problem, and we shall use these two phrases interchangeably.
As is well-known, detecting clusters in G is equivalent to finding a permutation matrix P such that
if A is the adjacency matrix of G, then PAP> is almost block diagonal. Thus, we can think of the
clustering problem as a special case of the matrix reduction problem where the matrix in question
has binary entries.
∗
[email protected]. Department of Mathematics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602. This research is partially
supported by the National Science Foundation under the grant #DMS 1521537.
†
[email protected]. Department of Mathematics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602. The second
author gratefully acknowledges the financial support of the NRF of South Africa while this research was conducted
1
One class of robust and accurate algorithms used to solve the clustering problem are the spectral
algorithms. Loosely, they work as follows. Suppose that |V | = n and let L denote the graph Laplacian, while 1Ca denotes the indicator vector of the a-th cluster (both to be defined in §3). Suppose
further that it is known a priori that G has k clusters. Let v1 , . . . , vk be orthogonal eigenvectors
associated to the k smallest eigenvalues of L, and consider the subspace span{v1 , . . . , vk } ⊂ Rn . One
can show that, under certain conditions, this subspace is ‘close’ to span{1C1 , . . . , 1Ck } and hence one
can use the basis {v1 , . . . , vk } to infer the supports of the basis {1C1 , . . . , 1Ck } , thus determining
the clusters C1 , . . . , Ck (of course supp(1Ca ) = Ca ). We refer the reader to [41], [35] or [37] for details.
Despite its theoretical and experimental success,the spectral approach has three main drawbacks:
1. The number of clusters k, needs to be known a priori. Clearly this is not always the case for
real data sets.
2. The algorithm cannot be used to find only a few clusters. As in many applications one is only
interested in finding one or two clusters ( thinking of the problem of identifying friends or
associates of a given user from a social network data set). Moreover in other cases where the
data set is extremely large, or only partially known, it might be computationally infeasible to
identify all clusters.
3. Computing an eigen decomposition of L typically requires O(n3 ) operations, making spectral
methods prohibitively slow for truly large data sets, such as those arising from electronic social
networks like Facebook or LinkedIn, or those arising from problems in Machine Learning.
However, in many situations (the social network example being one such case), the expected size
of the clusters, n0 , is small compared to n, and hence the indicator vectors 1Ca will be sparse. Our
approach is to adapt sparse recovery algorithms from the compressive sensing study to solve the
following problem:
arg min ||Lx||2 :
subject to xi = 1 and ||x||0 ≤ n0
(1.1)
to determine, directly, an approximation to the indicator vector of the cluster containing the vertex
of interest vi . One can then recover the cluster by considering the support of this vector. If desired,
one can iterate the algorithm to find all the remaining clusters of G.
Adapting compressive sensing algorithms to solve (1.1) proves challenging, as L is a poorly
conditioned sensing matrix. In general, a greedy type algorithm such as orthogonal matching pursuit
or iterative hard thresholding (cf. [21]) work very well when there are no intercluster edges (in this
case finding clusters reduces to finding connected components). Unfortunately, in the presence of
even a small number of intercluster edges, the first few iterations of a greedy algorithm are likely
to pick some indices outside the desired cluster. To overcome this difficulty, we propose a novel two
stage algorithm (see Algorithm 4 in §8) in which the first stage identifies a subset Ω ⊂ V which
contains the cluster of interest with high probability. The second stage then extracts the cluster
of interest from Ω using a greedy algorithm (we use Subspace Pursuit cf. [14]). In addition to the
aforementioned algorithm, the main contributions of this paper are the following:
1. An analysis of the Restricted Isometry and Coherence properties of the graph Laplacian. In
particular, we provide a series of probabilistic bounds on the restricted isometry constants and
coherence of Laplacians of graphs drawn from a well-studied model of random graphs (the
Stochastic Block Model (SBM)). See §5 and §6.
2. A proof that the Optimal Matching Pursuit (OMP) algorithm can be successfully used to detect
connected components of any graph, by solving (1.1) (see §7.)
2
3. A proof that, given a vertex vi , our Single Cluster Pursuit (SCP) Algorithm 4 successfully
finds the cluster containing vi when G is drawn from the Stochastic Block Model (SBM), for a
certain range of parameters and with probability tending to 1 as n → ∞. We achieve this by
combining the bounds of contribution with the theory of totally perturbed compressive sensing,
e.g. in [28].
4. An analysis of the computational complexity of Algorithm 4, showing that it finds a single
cluster in O(n2 + ln(n)nn0 ) time and all clusters in O(kn2 + ln(n)n2 ) time.
The structure of this paper is as follows. After briefly reviewing related work in §2, in §3 and
§4 we acquaint the reader with the necessary concepts from spectral graph theory and compressive
sensing, respectively. In §5 and §6 we study the restricted isometry property and coherence property
of Laplacians of random graphs. In §7 and §8, we describe two algorithms to handle graphs from
the Stochastic Block Model G(n, k, p, q) for q = 0 and q > 0, with respectively. We shall show that,
under certain mild assumptions on the graph G, the algorithms will indeed find the correct clustering
with high probability. §9 contains the computational complexity analysis, some possible extensions
and several future research directions. Finally, in §10 we present the results of several numerical
experiments to demonstrate the accuracy and speed of our algorithm and its powerful performance.
2
Related Work
The notion of community detection in graphs arises independently in multiple fields of applied
science, such as Sociology ([47],[40]), Computer Engineering ([26]), Machine Learning ([43]) and
Bioinformatics ([13]). In addition, many data sets can be represented as graphs by considering data
points as vertices and attaching edges between vertices that are ‘close’ with respect to an appropriate
metric. Thus, community detection algorithms can also be used to detect clusters in general data
sets, and indeed they have been shown to be superior to other clustering algorithms (for example
k-means) at detecting non-convex clusters ([30]).
The canonical probabilistic model of a graph containing communities is the Stochastic Block Model
(SBM), first explicitly introduced in the literature in the early 1980’s by Holland, Laskey, and
Leinhardt in [29]. Since then, there has been an explosion of interest in the SBM, driven in large part
by its many applications. In [1], Abbe identifies three forms of the community detection problem,
based on the kind of asymptotic accuracy we require (here, as in the rest of the paper, when we
speak of asymptotics we are considering the situation where the number of vertices, n, goes to
∞). In this paper we shall be concerned with the Exact Recovery Problem, where we require that
P (#misclassified vertices > 0) = o(1). A fundamental information theoretic barrier to exact recovery
is given by the following result (cf. [3]):
Theorem 2.1. The exact recovery problem , i.e. P (#misclassified vertices > 0) = o(1) with respect
to n for the symmetric SBM G(n, k, p, q) is solvable in polynomial time if, writing p = P ln(n)/n and
q = Q ln(n)/n:
p
1 √
P − Q >1
(2.1)
k
and not solvable if:
p
1 √
P − Q <1
(2.2)
k
Remark 2.2. This result was proved in [3] (and see also [1]). We note that in the cases our
algorithm
is guaranteed to solve the exact recovery problem (see Theorem 8.2), we assume that
√
√
1
P − Q → ∞, well above this theoretical bound.
k
3
Given the bound (2.1), the challenge then is to construct efficient algorithms to solve the Exact
Recovery Problem. There are myriad algorithmic approaches, such as the spectral approach (originally proposed by Fiedler in [19] for the two cluster case), hierarchical approaches like the DIANA
algorithm popular in bioinformatics ([31]) and message passing algorithms ([24]), to name a few.
Recently, two new classes of algorithms, namely degree-profiling ([3]) and semidefinite progamming
approaches ([2], [36], [27] and [33] among others) have been shown to solve the exact recovery problem with high probability right down to the theoretical bound (2.1). Degree-profiling even runs in
quasi-linear time, although it requires the parameters p, q and k as inputs, making it less than ideal
for analysing real world data sets. As the new algorithm we propose is most closely related to the
spectral approach, let us recall this algorithm here (as formulated by Ng, Jordan and Weiss in [41]).
Algorithm 1 The Spectral Clustering Algorithm (SC)
Input: the adjacency matrix A.
(1) Form the degree matrix D = diag (d1 , . . . , dn ) and Laplacian L := D−1/2 AD−1/2
(2) Find the k (orthogonal) eigenvectors v1 , . . . , vk corresponding to the k largest eigenvalues of
L.
(3) Form the matrix U = [v1 , . . . , vk ] and normalize the rows to get V
(4) Sort the rows of V into k clusters B1 , . . . , Bk using k-means.
(5) Assign vertex i to community Cj if and only if row i is in Bj .
Output: Communities C1 , . . . , Ck .
We mention that notions from Compressive Sensing have been applied to community detection
before, notably in the semidefinite programming approaches mentioned above, and in [45] where
signal processing techniques for functions defined on a graph G are used to speed up the computation
of the eigenvectors of L. Our approach is distinct from these. To the best of the authors’ knowledge,
the study in this paper is the first attempt to find the indicator vectors 1Ci directly using sparse
recovery.
3
Preliminary on Graph Theory
3.1
Some Elementary Notions and Definitions
Formally, by a graph G we mean a set of vertices V together with a subset E ⊂ {{u, v} : u, v ∈ V }
of edges1 . As we are only concerned with finite graphs, we shall always identify the vertex set V
with a finite set of consecutive natural numbers: V = [n] := {1, 2, . . . , n}. The degree of any vertex
i ∈ G is the total number of edges incident to i, that is di = |{{i, j} ∈ E}|.
0
0
0
0
0
A subgraph G of G is a subset of vertices V ⊂ V together with a subset of vertices E ⊂ E ∩ V × V .
Given any subset S ⊂ V , we denote by GS the subgraph with vertex set S and edge set all edges
{i, j} with i, j ∈ S. A path in G is a set of ‘linked’ edges {{i1 , i2 }, {i2 , i3 }, . . . , {ik−1 , ik }, and we say
that G is connected if there is a path linking any two vertices i, j ∈ V , and disconnected otherwise.
If G is disconnected, any subgraph GS ⊂ G which is connected and maximal with respect to the
property of being connected is called a connected component.
If G is connected, we define the diameter of G to be the length of (i.e. the number of edges in)
the longest path. Given any i ∈ V and any non-negative integer j, we define the ball Bj (i) ⊂ V
to be the set of all vertices connected to i be a path of length j or shorter. A good reference on
elementary graph theory is [5].
1
We only consider undirected graphs
4
3.2
The Graph Laplacian
To any graph G with |V | = n we associate a symmetric, n × n, non-negative matrix called the
adjacency matrix A, defined as Aij = Aji = 1 if {i, j} ∈ E and Aij = 0 otherwise. The graph
Laplacians of G are defined as follows.
Definition 3.1. Let A denote the adjacency matrix of a graph G and let D denote the matrix
diag(d1 , . . . , dn ) where di is the degree of the i-th vertex. We define the normalized, symmetric graph
Laplacian of G as Ls := I − D−1/2 AD−1/2 and the normalized, random walk graph Laplacian as
Lrw := I − D−1 A.
We first have a few basic properties of graph Laplacians.
Theorem 3.2. Suppose that L = Ls or Lrw . We have the following properties:
1. The eigenvalues of L are real and non-negative.
2. λn−1 ≤ 2
3. Let λ1 ≤ λ2 ≤ . . . ≤ λn denote the eigenvalues of L in ascending order. Let k denote the
number of connected components of G. Then λi = 0 for i ≤ k and λi > 0 for i > k.
Proof.
For L = Ls , Items 1 to 3 follow from Lemma 1.7 in [12]. If L = Lrw , observe that
Lrw = D−1/2 Ls D1/2 , and so the eigenvalues of Lrw and Ls coincide. Hence the above hold for Lrw
as well.
n
For any subset S ⊂ [n] we define its indicator vector, denoted 1S ∈ R , by (1S )i = 1 if i ∈ S and
zero otherwise. Let C1 , · · · , Ck be the clusters of G. One can check (and see also [35] proposition 2)
that Lrw 1Ci = 0 for i = 1, · · · , k. Thus we have the following:
Theorem 3.3. The indicator vectors of the connected components of G, 1C1 , . . . , 1Ck , form a basis
for the zero eigenspace (i.e. the kernel) of Lrw .
For the rest of this paper, by L we shall mean Lrw . We shall refer to the i-th column of L as `i .
One can easily check that:
Aik
(`i )k = δik −
.
dk
Finally, we shall denote by L−i the submatrix of L obtained by dropping the column `i .
3.3
Random Graph Theory
As outlined in §2, the Stochastic Block Model (SBM) is a widely used mathematical model of a
random graph with clusters.
Definition 3.4. Given n = kn0 , fix a partition of V := [n] into k subsets C1 , . . . , Ck of equal size
n0 . We say G is drawn from the SBM G(n, k, p, q) if, for all i, j ∈ [n] with i 6= j , the edge {i, j} is
inserted independently and with probability p if i, j ∈ Ca for some a = 1, · · · , k and q otherwise.
As we area interested in clustering we assume that q << p. We emphasize that the partition
V = C1 ∪C2 ∪. . .∪Ck is fixed before any edges are assigned. We note that the subgraphs GCa are i.i.d
instances of a simpler random graph model, the Erdös-Rényi (ER) model G(n0 , p), first introduced
in [18]
Definition 3.5. We say H is drawn from the ER model G(n0 , p) if H has n0 vertices and for all
i, j ∈ [n0 ] the edge {i, j} is inserted independently and with probability p.
5
Returning to the SBM, for any vertex i in community Ca , we define its in-community degree as
d0i = #{{i, j} ∈ E : j ∈ Ca } and its out-of-community degree as di := #{{i, j} ∈ E : j ∈
/ Ca }. One
can easily see that
E[d0i ] = p(n0 − 1) and E[di ] = q(n − n0 )
and by definition di = d0i + di . In fact d0i is the degree of i considered as a vertex in the ER subgraph
GCa . An important fact about degrees in ER random graphs is that they concentrate around their
mean:
Theorem 3.6. Suppose G is drawn from G(n, k, p, q).
1. For any α > 0, if p ≥
4 ln(n)
then with probability at least 1 − 1/n:
α 2 n0
(1 − α)n0 p ≤ d0i ≤ (1 + α)n0 p
2. In particular, if p ≥
p
1/ ln(n) = o(1).
for all i ∈ {1, 2, · · · , n}
(3.1)
4k(ln(n))2
then (3.1) holds, with probability at least 1 − 1/n, for α =
n
Proof. This theorem is a variation on a well known result for ER graphs (e.g. theorem 3.6 in
[25]). Each d0i follows the binomial distribution with parameters n0 − 1 and p, so by the Chernoff
2
bound: P |d0i − n0 p| ≥ αn0 p ≤ e−α n0 p/2 . Hence:
0
P max |di − n0 p| ≥ αn0 p = P |d01 − n0 p| ≥ αn0 p or |d02 − n0 p| ≥ αn0 p or . . . or |d0n − n0 p| ≥ αn0 p
i∈[n]
n
X
2
P |d0i − n0 p| ≥ αn0 p = ne−α n0 p/2
≤
i=1
Thus P max
i∈[n0 ]
|d0i
4 ln(n)
2 ln(n2 )
2
− n0 p| ≤ αn0 p = 1 − ne−α n0 p/2 If p ≥ 2
=
then:
α n0
α 2 n0
1 − ne−α
2 n p/2
0
2
≤ 1 − ne− ln(n ) = 1 − 1/n
p
This proves part 1. Part 2 follows by taking α = 1/ ln(n), in which case the lower bound on p
becomes:
4k(ln(n))2
4 ln(n)
4(ln(n))2
4(ln(n))2
=
=
=
α 2 n0
n0
n/k
n
The second remarkable property of the ER model is that the eigenvalues of L also concentrate
around their mean:
Theorem 3.7. Let L be the Laplacian of a random graph drawn from G(n0 , p) with p >> (ln(n0 ))2 /n0
and let λ1 ≤ λ2 ≤ . . . ≤ λn0 denote its eigenvalues. Then almost surely 2 :
max |1 − λi | ≤ (1 + o(1)) √
i6=1
4
g(n0 ) log2 (n0 )
+
pn0
pn0
where g(n0 ) is a function tending to infinity arbitrarily slowly.
2
Given a family of random graph models Gn we say that some graph property P holds almost surely if
P[G ∈ Gn , G does not have P] = o(1) with respect to n
6
Proof. Given that the expected degree of each vertex in G is pn0 , this is just Theorem 3.6 in [11]
Remark 3.8. For our purposes, it will be enough to note that this gives:
√
√
4/ p
4/ p
1
1
λ2 ≥ 1 − √
− o( √ ) and λn0 ≤ 1 + √
+ o( √ )
n0
n0
n0
n0
almost surely.
4
Preliminaries on Compressive Sensing
Let Φ ∈ Rm×N and y ∈ Rm with m < N . We say that a vector x is sparse if it has few non-zero
entries relative to its length. We follow the convention of defining the ‘0 quasi-norm’ as:
kxk0 = #{xi : xi 6= 0}
and we say x is s-sparse if kxk0 ≤ s. Compressive sensing is concerned with solving
arg min{kxk0 :
x ∈ RN , Φx = y}
(4.1)
in the case where m < N (that is, when the linear system is underdetermined). We call (4.1)
the Sparse Recovery Problem. One also considers the Perturbed Sparse Recovery Problem where
y = Φx∗ + e with kek2 ≤ η << kyk2 and we wish to solve:
x# := arg min{kxk0 :
x ∈ RN , kΦx − yk2 ≤ η}
(4.2)
while guaranteeing that x# is a good approximation to x∗ by bounding kx# − x∗ k2 ? We remark
that problem (4.2) is equivalent to the dual problem:
x# := arg min{kΦx − yk2 :
x ∈ RN , kxk0 ≤ n0 }
(4.3)
We refer the reader to [21] for an excellent introduction to the area.
4.1
Computational Algorithms
Many numerical algorithms have been invented for solving (4.1) and (4.3), for example, `1 convex
minimization and its variations, hard thresholding iteration and its variations, greedy approaches
such as orthogonal matching pursuit (OMP) as well as more exotic approaches like `q nonconvex
minimization. See, for example, [10], [8], [6], [46], [7], [22], [23]. Due to its efficiency, we shall focus
on the greedy approach in this paper, specifically the Orthogonal Matching Pursuit (OMP) and
Subspace Pursuit (SP) algorithms, see Algorithms 2 and 3, respectively. For notational convenience,
we shall follow [21] and denote by ΦS the column submatrix of Φ consisting of the columns indexed
by the subset S ⊂ [N ]. For a vector x ∈ RN we denote by xS either the subvector in R|S| consisting
of the entries xi for i indexed by S, or the vector
xi if i ∈ S
(xS )i =
0 if i ∈
/S
It should always be clear from the context which definition we are referring to. We also remind the
reader of the following operations on vectors v ∈ Rn , defined in [21]:
vi if i ∈ S
Ls (v) = index set of s largest absolute entries of v and Hs (v) = vLs (v) =
0 if i ∈
/S
7
where Hs is sometimes referred to as the Hard Thresholding Operator.
Algorithm 2 The OMP Algorithm
Inputs: y and Φ
Initialize: r(0) = y, S (0) = ∅, x(0) = 0 and α = 0.
while True do
α←α+1
i(α) := L1 (Φ> rα−1 )
S (α) = S (α−1) ∪ {i(α) }
x(α) := arg min{||ΦS (α) zS (α) − y||2 : z ∈ RN and supp(z) ⊂ S (α) }
r(α) := y − Φx(α)
if Stopping Criterion met then
Output x# := xα
Break
end if
end while
Algorithm 3 The SP algorithm ([14])
Inputs: y, Φ and an integer s ≥ 1
Initialization:
(1) T 0 = Ls (Φ> y).
(2) x0 = arg min{ky − ΦT 0 xk2 : supp(x) ⊂ T 0 }
(3) r0 = y − ΦT 0 x0
Iteration:
for k = 1 : kmax do
(1) T̂ k = T k−1 ∪ Ls Φ> rk−1
(2) u = arg min{ky − ΦT̂ k xk2 : x ∈ RN and supp(x) ⊂ T̂ k }
(3) T k = Ls (u) and xk = Hs (u)
(4) rk = y − ΦT k xk
end for
The most common stopping criteria for Algorithm 2 are α = k, or kr(α) k2 < for a given k or .
A sufficient condition to guarantee the convergence of Algorithm 2 is the following
Theorem 4.1. For any S ⊂ [N ], if ΦS is injective and satisfies
kΦ†S ΦS c k1→1 < 1,
(4.4)
where Φ†S is the pseudo-inverse of ΦS , then any vector x with support S is recovered in at most
s = |S| steps of OMP.
We refer to [46] for a proof. See also Remark 3.6 in [21].
Remark 4.2. In [14] where the SP algorithm is introduced, they suggest solving the least squares
problems (that is (2) in Initialization and (2) in Iteration) exactly. In our implementation, we use
MATLAB’s lsqr algorithm to solve them approximately, to a high precision. As pointed out by [38]
in their analysis of CoSaMP, a very similar algorithm, this does not affect the convergence analysis
of the algorithm.
8
4.2
Fundamental Concepts
A very important concept, the restricted isometry property (RIP), introduced by Candés and Tao
([10]) plays a critical role in the study of the existence and uniqueness of a sparse solution from
a sensing matrix and whether the solution of an `1 minimization is the sparse solution. Another
concept, mutual coherence, introduced by Donoho and his collaborators in ([17] is also used in this
study.
Definition 4.3. Letting 0 < s < m < N be an integer and ΦS be a submatrix of Φ which consists
of columns of Φ whose column indices are in S ⊂ [N ]. The restricted isometry constant (RIC) δs of
Φ is the smallest quantity such that
(1 − δs )kxk22 ≤ kΦS xk22 ≤ (1 + δs )kxk22
(4.5)
for all subsets S with with cardinality |S| ≤ s. If a matrix Φ has such a constant δs < 1 for some s,
Φ is said to possesses RIP of order s. It is known that
δs =
min
S⊂{1,··· ,n}
|S|≤s
kΦ>
S ΦS − Is k2→2 ,
(4.6)
where Is is the identity matrix of size s × s.
Definition 4.4. The coherence of a matrix Φ, denoted µ, is the largest normalized inner product
between its columns:
|hφi , φj i|
.
µ := max
i6=j kφi k2 kφj k2
4.3
Totally Perturbed Compressive Sensing
Frequently it is useful to modify problem (4.3) further to allow for small perturbations in the observed
measurement matrix. That is, suppose that y = Φx∗ + e and let Φ̂ = Φ + E, where E is a small
perturbation matrix. Denoting again:
x# := arg min{kΦ̂x − yk2 :
x ∈ RN , kxk0 ≤ s},
(4.7)
can we still guarantee that x# is a good approximation to x∗ by bounding kx# −x∗ k2 ? Problem (4.7)
is called the Totally Perturbed Sparse Recovery Problem. Analyzing (4.7) is often more important for
applications than analyzing (4.3), as frequently we only know the measurement matrix Φ to within
a certain error tolerance.
Theorem 4.5 (Herman and Strohmer, [28]). Suppose that Φ̂ = Φ + E. Let δs and δ̂s denote the s
restricted isometry constants of Φ and Φ̂ respectively. Define3 sΦ := kEk2,s /kΦk2,s . Then:
δ̂s ≤ (1 + δs ) (1 + sΦ )2 − 1
To bound the error kx# − x∗ k2 , we need the following result. Define y = Φx and suppose that
ŷ = Φx + e is the observed (perturbed) measurement vector. Suppose further that we only have
access to Φ̂ = Φ + E, a small perturbation of the measurement matrix. Define y := kek2 /kyk2 ,
Φ = kEk2 /kΦk2 and let sΦ be as above.
3
For a matrix Φ we denote by kΦkp the induced operator norm kΦkp = maxx6=0
semi-norm max kΦS kp
S⊂[n]
|S|=s
9
kΦxkp
kxkp
By kΦkp,s we mean the
Theorem 4.6. Suppose that x is s-sparse. Define the following constants:
q
√
√
2 (1 + δ̂ 2 )
2δ̂3s
2 2+1
( 2 + 2)δ̂3s
3s
(1 − δ̂3s )(1 − ρ̂) +
and τ̂ = q
ρ̂ =
.
2
1 − δ̂3s
(1 − δ̂3s )(1 − ρ̂)
1 − δ̂ 2
3s
Suppose that δ̂3s ≤ 0.4859. Then after m = ln(Φ + y )/ ln(ρ̂) iterations of Subspace Pursuit (Algorithm 3) applied to problem (4.7), we have
!
p
kx − xm k2
1 + δ̂s
≤ τ̂
+ 1 (sΦ + y ).
kxk2
1 − sΦ
Remark 4.7. This is Theorem 2 in [34], adapted to the case the x is s-sparse (the result in. loc.
sit. is for the more general case where x is compressible).
5
The RIP of Laplacian of Random Graphs
We first study the RIP for the Laplacian of a connected ER graph drawn from G(n0 , p). We then
extend this to a result on the RIP for graphs drawn from the SBM G(n, k, p, 0), as these can be
thought of as a disjoint union of k ER graphs. Finally, we extend to graphs drawn from G(n, k, p, q)
for 0 < q << p using a perturbation argument.
5.1
RIP for Laplacian of G(n0 , p)
Lemma 5.1. Let L be the Laplacian of a connected graph G with n0 vertices. Let S ⊂ [n0 ] with
|S| = s < n0 . Then σmin (LS ) ≥ (1 − s/n0 )λ2 and δs = max{1 − (1 − s/n0 ) λ22 , λ2n0 − 1}, where λi
denotes the i-th eigenvalue of L, ordered from smallest to largest.
Proof. Let w1 , . . . , wn0 be an orthonormal basis of eigenvectors of L with eigenvalues
P 0 λ1 ≤ · · · ≤
λn0 , where λ1 = 0 and λ2 > 0. For any v supported on S with kvk2 = 1, write v = ni=1
αi wi . Note
that w1 = √1n0 1 and ker(L) = span(w1 ). Then:
kLvk22 = L
n
X
!
2
αi wi
=
i=1
2
n
X
2
αi λi wi
i=2
=
2
n
X
αi2 λ2i ≥
i=2
n
X
!
αi2
λ22
i=2
P 0 2
P 0 2
αi = 1 − α12 . Thus kLvk22 ≥ λ22 (1 − α12 ) and so
Because ni=1
αi = kvk22 = 1 we have that ni=2
clearly this quantity is minimized by making α1 as large as possible. Observe that:
√
1
1 √
s
1
α1 = √ 1 · v ≤ √ kvk1 ≤ √ ( skvk2 ) = √ .
n0
n0
n0
n0
We remark that this bound on α1 is sharp, and is achieved by taking v =
σmin (LS ) =
min
supp(v)⊂S
kvk2 =1
kLvk22
r
≥
1−
s
n0
2 !
λ22
=
On the other hand:
max kLvk22 ≤ max kLvk22 = λ2n0 .
supp(v)⊂S
kvk2 =1
kvk2 =1
10
√1 1S .
s
s
1−
n0
Hence:
λ22 .
Hence for any S ⊂ [n] with |S| = s, and any v with supp(v) ⊂ S and kvk2 = 1, we have:
s
λ22 ≤ kLvk22 ≤ λ2n0
1−
n0
and the claim about δs follows.
Theorem 5.2 (RIP for Laplacian of ER graphs). Suppose that G ∈ G(n0 , p) with Laplacian L and
suppose that p >> (ln(n0 ))2 /n0 . If s = γn0 with γ ∈ (0, 1) then
8p−1/2
1
δs ≤ γ + (1 − γ) √
+ o( √ )
n0
n0
almost surely
4
Proof. By Theorem 3.7, and Remark 3.8,
4p−1/2
4p−1/2
1
1
λ2 ≥ 1 − √
− o( √ ) and λn0 ≤ 1 + √
+ o( √ )
n0
n0
n0
n0
almost surely. Combining this with Lemma 5.1, we get that:
!2
4p−1/2
1
δs ≤ 1 − (1 − s/n0 ) 1 − √
− o( √ )
n0
n0
!
1
8p−1/2
+ o( √ )
= 1 − (1 − γ) 1 − √
n0
n0
!
8p−1/2
1
8p−1/2
1
= 1 − 1 − γ − (1 − γ) √
+ o( √ ) = γ + (1 − γ) √
+ o( √ ).
n0
n0
n0
n0
as claimed.
We conclude this subsection with a lower bound for kLk2,s (see §4.3 for the definition of k · k2,s ),
where L is the Laplacian of a connected graph.
Lemma 5.3. If L is the Laplacian of a connected graph G with n0 vertices, then kLk2,s ≥ λs−1 ,.
Proof. Recall that:
kLk2,s := max kLS k2 = max σmax (LS )
(5.1)
S⊂[n]
|S|=s
S⊂[n]
|S|=s
We shall apply Theorem 5.4 below. For a matrix such as L which is conjugate to a symmetric nonnegative definite matrix, the eigenvalues coincide with the singular values. Translating the notation
of this Theorem 5.4 into the current situation, for p = n, q = s, βi = σi (LS ) and αi = λi (L). Clearly,
min(m, n) = min(n, n) = n and min(p, q) = min(n, s) = s. We use Theorem 5.4 again to get:
σmax (LS ) ≥ λs−1 .
And so
max σmax (LS ) ≥ λs−1 .
S⊂[1,··· ,n]
|S|=s
In the proof above, we have used the following classic interpolation Theorem for singular values:
4
Recall that here and throughout this paper we say that a property holds almost surely if the probability that it
does not hold is o(1) with respect to n0 (or sometimes n)
11
Theorem 5.4. Let A be an m × n matrix with singular values α1 ≤ α2 ≤ . . . ≤ αmin(m,n) . Suppose
that B is a p × q submatrix of A, with singular values β1 ≤ β2 ≤ . . . ≤ βmin(p.q) Then:
αmin(m,n)−i ≥ βmin(p,q)−i for i = 0, 1, . . . , min(p, q) − 1
and
βi ≥ αmin(m,n)−min(p,q)−(m−p)−(n−q)−1+i
for integer i satisfying min(p, q) + (m − p) + (n − q) + 2 − min(m, n) ≤ i ≤ min(m, n).
Proof.
This is Theorem 1 in [44]. Note that they use the opposite notational convention:
α1 ≥ α2 ≥ . . . ≥ αmin(m,n) and β1 ≥ β2 ≥ . . . ≥ βmin(p.q) .
5.2
RIP for Laplacian of Graphs from G(n, k, p, 0)
Lemma 5.5. Suppose that a graph G has k connected components C1 , · · · , Ck , all of size n0 (for
example, G ∈ G(n, k, p, 0)). Let GC1 , . . . , GCk denote the subgraphs on these components and let Li
denote their Laplacians. Then for any s < n0 , δs (LG ) = maxi δs (Li ).
Suppose S ⊂ Ci for
i. For simplicity we assume i = 1, but the other cases are
1some
LS
where L1 denotes the Laplacian of GC1 and 0 here is the zero
identical. In this case LS =
0
matrix of the appropriate size. If supp(v) ⊂ S, then kLS vk22 = kL1S vs k22 and so:
Proof.
(1 − δs (L1 ))kvk22 ≤ kLS vk22 ≤ (1 + δs (L1 ))kvk22
(5.2)
It follows that, for all index sets S contained in a single component (i.e. S ⊂ Ci for some i), we have:
(1 − max δs (Li ) )kvk22 ≤ kLS vk22 ≤ (1 + max δs (Li ) )kvk22 .
i
i
Now suppose that
Pk S 6⊂ Ci . Write S = ∪i Si where Si := S ∩ Ci . Given any v with supp(v) = S, we
can write v = i=1 vi with vi = HSi (v). Then:
kLS vk22
=
k
X
2
LSi vi
i=1
2
Crucially, observe that all the terms LSi vi have disjoint support. Hence:
2
kLS vk22
=
X
i
LSi vi
=
2
X
kLSi vi k22 ≥
X
i
1 − δsi (Li ) kvi k22 by (5.2)
i
i
≥ min 1 − δsi (L )
i
X
kvi k22 = min 1 − δsi (Li ) kvk22
i
i
i
2
i
= 1 − max δsi (L ) kvk2 ≥ 1 − max δs (L ) kvk22
i
i
with the final inequality holding as si ≤ s for all i and δt is non-decreasing in t. An identical argument
yields that:
kLS vk22 ≤
1 + max δs (Li ) kvk22
i
12
and so we have
(1 − max δs (Li ) )kvk22 ≤ kLS vk22 ≤ (1 + max δs (Li ) )kvk22 .
i
i
This completes the proof.
Theorem 5.6 (RIP for Laplacian of Graphs from Stochastic Block Model). Suppose G ∈ G(n, k, p, 0),
with n0 = n/k and Laplacian L. Suppose further that p >> (ln(n0 ))2 /n0 and that k is O(1) with
respect to n. If s = γn0 with γ ∈ (0, 1) then:
8p−1/2
1
δs (L) ≤ γ + (1 − γ) √
+ o( √ )
n0
n0
(5.3)
almost surely.
Proof. Because q = 0, G will have k connected components with probability 1. Note that each
subgraph Gi is an i.i.d ER graph, drawn from G(n0 , p). Let Li denote the Laplacian of GCi . By
Theorem 5.2
8p−1/2
1
δs (Li ) ≤ γ + (1 − γ) √
+ o( √ )
(5.4)
n0
n0
almost surely. That is, there exists a function f (n0 ) going to 0 as n0 → ∞ such that (5.4) holds with
probability 1 − f (n0 ). As the GCi are i.i.d:
8p−1/2
1
max δs (Li ) ≤ γ + (1 − γ) √
+ o( √ )
1≤i≤k
n0
n0
(5.5)
with probability (1 − f (n0 ))k . As long as k is eventually bounded with respect to n0 (i.e. k is O(1)
with respect to n), (1 − f (n0 ))k → 1 as n0 → ∞. Hence (5.5) holds almost surely.
Again, we conclude this subsection with a lower bound for kLk2,s .
Lemma 5.7. Suppose that a graph G has k connected components C1 , · · · , Ck , all of size n0 . Let
GC1 , . . . , GCk denote the subgraphs on these components and let Li denote their Laplacians. Then
kLk2,s ≥ maxa∈[k] λs−1 (La ).
Proof. We leave the proof to the interested reader.
5.3
RIP for Laplacian of Graphs from G(n, k, p, q) with q > 0
Finally, we study the RIP for Laplacian of graphs from G(n, k, p, q) with q > 0. Observe that for
G ∈ G(n, k, p, q) we may write A = A0 + A where A0 contains the intracluster edges and A
contains the intercluster edges:
1 if {i, j} ∈ E and i, j ∈ Ca for an a ∈ {1, · · · , k}
0
Aij =
0
otherwise
1 if {i, j} ∈ E and i ∈ Ca and j ∈ Cb for some a 6= b
Aij =
0
otherwise.
Assuming that q << p, there are much fewer intercluster than intracluster edges, and thus A is
much sparser than A0 . Observe further that we can regard A0 as the adjacency matrix of a subgraph
G0 ⊂ G, obtained by removing all the intercluster edges. In fact, G0 ∈ G(n, k, p, 0). Let L0 denote
the Laplacian of the underlying graph G0 . It is tempting to assume that L = L0 + L , where L is a
13
Laplacian associated to A , but unfortunately this is not the case. However, one can still regard L as
a small perturbation of L0 , i.e. L = L0 + E. In order to establish bounds on the restricted isometry
constants of L, we need to bound the size of the perturbation E, which we do in Theorem 5.8. First,
recall that, as in §3.3, for any i ∈ Ca , d0i denotes the in-community degree (equivalently the degree
P of
i in GCa or G0 ) and di denotes the out-of-community degree. In terms of A0 and A , d0i = j A0ij
P
and di = j Aj . Define ri = di /d0i . We can assume that di << d0i , equivalently ri << 1, for all i.
Theorem 5.8. Let L be the Laplacian of a graph drawn at random from G(n, k, p, q) with p ≥
4k(ln(n))2 /n and let α be as in part 2 of Theorem 3.6. Suppose further that max1≤i≤n ri ≤ r << 1.
Then L = L0 + E where L0 is the Laplacian of G0 and E = E1 + E2 such that supp(E1 ) = supp(A0 )
and supp(E2 ) = supp(A ) and the following bounds hold:
1. kE1 k∞ , kE2 k∞ ≤ r + O(r2 ).
2. kE1 k1 , kE2 k1 ≤ β 2 r + O(r2 )
3. kE1 k2 , kE2 k2 ≤ βr + O(r2 ).
4. for any s < n, kE1 k2,s , kE2 k2,s ≤ βr + O(r2 ) and kEk2,s ≤ 2βr + O(r2 )
where β 2 = (1 + α)/(1 − α).
The proof of Theorem 5.8 uses the following lemma:
Lemma 5.9. Suppose that L is the Laplacian of a graph G drawn from G(n, k, p, q), and let L0 denote
the Laplacian of the underlying (disconnected) graph G0 , thought of as drawn from G(n, k, p, 0).
Suppose further that max1≤i≤n ri ≤ r << 1. Then L = L0 + E, where:
(
1
ri + O(r2 ) A0ij
if i, j ∈ Ca
d0i
Eij =
1
2
(ri − 1) + O(r ) Aij if i ∈ Ca and j ∈ Cb for a 6= b
d0
i
A
Proof.
By definition Lij = δij − dij
where δij = 1 if i = j and zero otherwise. Observe
i
1
1
1
1 1
1
1
= 0
Because ri << 1 for all i, by Taylor’s Theorem
=
that
= 0
=
0
d
di
di
di + di
di 1 + 0i
di 1 + ri
di
1
1 − ri + O(ri2 ) . Direct computation reveals that, for i, j ∈ Ca :
0
di
!
0
A
1
1
ij
Lij = δij − 0 1 − ri + O(ri2 ) A0ij = δij − 0 + 0 ri + O(r2 ) A0ij
di
di
di
1
= L0ij + 0 ri + O(r2 ) A0ij
di
as 1/d0i ≤ ri = O(r). The calculation for i, j in different clusters is similar.
Let us write E = E1 + E2 where E1 will contain the ‘on-diagonal’ perturbation, and E2 will
contain the ‘off diagonal’ perturbation:
Eij if i, j ∈ Ca , a ∈ [k]
Eij if i ∈ Ca and j ∈ Cb for a 6= b, a, b ∈ [k]
1
2
Eij =
and Eij =
0
otherwise
0
otherwise
We are now ready to prove Theorem 5.8.
14
Proof. [Proof of theorem 5.8] By definition, k · k∞ is the maximum absolute row sum of the matrix
in question. For any i, let Ca be the cluster to which it belongs. Then:
X
|E1ij | =
j
X ri + O(r2 )
ri + O(r2 ) X 0
ri + O(r2 ) 0
0
A
=
(di ) = ri + O(r2 ).
A
=
ij
ij
d0i
d0i
d0i
j∈Ca
j∈Ca
Hence, we have
X
= max
|E1ij | = max(ri ) + O(r2 ) ≤ r + O(r2 ).
kE1 k∞
i
i
j
Similarly:
X
|E2ij | =
j
X (ri − 1) + O(r2 )
1 + O(r2 ) X
1 + O(r2 )
A
≤
A
=
(di ) ≤ ri + O(r2 )
ij
ij
d0i
d0i
d0i
j ∈C
/ a
j ∈C
/ a
as ri := di /d0i , and so again:
kE2 k∞ = max
X
i
|E2ij | = max(ri ) + O(r2 ) ≤ r + O(r2 )
i
j
Before continuing, recall that as p ≥ 4k(ln(n))2 /n we may choose an α = o(1) with respect to n such
that (1 − α)n0 p ≤ d0i ≤ (1 + α)n0 p almost surely for all i ∈ [n], by part 2 of Theorem 3.6. Now,
because k · k1 is the maximum absolute column sum, for any j in cluster Ca , we have
X
|E1ij | =
1≤i≤n
X ri + O(r2 )
r + O(r2 ) X 0
r + O(r2 ) 0
0
A
≤
A
≤
(dmax )
ij
ij
d0i
d0min
d0min
i∈Ca
i∈Ca
≤ (r + O(r2 ))
(1 + α)n0 p
r(1 + α)
=
+ O(r2 ) = β 2 r + O(r2 )
(1 − α)n0 p
(1 − α)
and so:
!
1
kE k1 = max
X
j
|E1ij |
≤ β 2 r + O(r2 ).
i
Similarly;
X
|E2ij | =
1≤i≤n
X (ri − 1) + O(r2 )
dj
1 + O(r2 ) X
2
A
≤
A
=
(1
+
O(r
))
ij
ij
d0i
d0min
d0min
i∈C
/ a
i∈C
/ a
≤ (1 + O(r2 ))
1+α
1−α
dj
d0max
≤ (1 + O(r2 ))
1 + α dj
≤ β 2 rj + O(r2 )
1 − α d0j
and so again we have
!
kE2 k1 = max
j
X
|E2ij |
≤ β 2 max(rj ) + O(r2 ) ≤ β 2 r + O(r2 ).
j
i
Now, by the Riesz-Thorin interpolation theorem:
1/2
2
2
kE1 k2 ≤ kE1 k1 kE1 k1/2
∞ ≤ β r + O(r )
15
1/2
(r + O(r2 ))1/2 = βr + O(r2 )
and by an identical argument kE2 k2 ≤ βr + O(r2 ). Part 4 follows from the simple fact that for any
matrix B, kBk2,s ≤ kBk2 , and the bound for kEk2,s follows from the fact that E = E1 + E2 and the
triangle inequality.
We are now ready to state and prove the main result of this section.
Theorem 5.10. Suppose that G ∈ G(n, k, p, q), with block sizes n0 = n/k and Laplacian L. Suppose
further that:
1. p >> (ln(n0 ))2 /n0
2. k is O(1) with respect to n.
3. max ri ≤ r << 1.
1≤i≤n
If t = γn0 with γ ∈ (0, 1) then:
r
1
D2
δt (L) ≤ γ + D1 r + √ + D3 √ + O(r2 ) + o( √ )
n0
n0
n0
(5.6)
almost surely, where D1 , D2 and D3 are O(1) with respect to n0
Proof. As above, we write L = L0 + E, where L0 is the Laplacian of the subgraph G0 , thought of
as drawn from G(n, k, p, 0). We define δt := δt (L0 ) and δ̂t := δt (L). By Theorem 4.5:
δ̂t ≤ (1 + δt )(1 + tL )2 − 1.
(5.7)
As defined in a previous section, tL := kEk2,t /kL0 k2,t . Theorem 5.8 gives us that kEk2,t ≤ 2βr +
O(r2 ), while Lemma 5.7 gives kL0 k2,t ≥ max1≤a≤k λt−1 (La ) (recall that La denotes the Laplacian of
the subgraph GCa ). By a similar argument to that of Theorem 5.6, we can apply Lemma 3.7 (and
see also remark 3.8) to get:
4p−1/2
1
max λt−1 (La ) ≥ 1 − √
− o( √ )
1≤a≤k
n0
n0
almost surely, assuming that k is eventually bounded with respect to n0 . For convenience, choose n0
√
large enough such that 4p−1/2 / n0 + o( √1n0 ) ≤ 1/4. Under this assumption:
tL0 =
kEk2,t
2βr + O(r2 )
8βr
≤
=
+ O(r2 )
kL0 k2,t
1 − 1/4
3
Combining this with (5.7) and Theorem 5.6:
!
2
8p−1/2
1
8βr
2
δ̂s ≤ 1 + γ + (1 − γ) √
+ o( √ )
1+
+ O(r ) − 1
n0
n0
3
!
8p−1/2
1
16βr
2
= 1 + γ + (1 − γ) √
+ o( √ )
1+
+ O(r ) − 1
n0
n0
3
!
−1/2 β
1
128(1
−
γ)p
1
16β(1 + γ)
r
=γ+r
+√
8(1 − γ)p−1/2 + √
+ O(r2 ) + o( √ )
3
n0
n0
3
n0
and letting D1 = 16β(1 + γ)/3, D2 = 8(1 − γ)p−1/2 , D3 = 128(1 − γ)p−1/2 β 2 /3 gives equation (5.6).
Finally, because β → 1 as n → ∞, we indeed have that D1 , D2 and D3 are O(1) with respect to n0 .
16
6
The Coherence Properties for Laplacians of Random Graphs
In this section we study the coherence properties of Laplacians of random graphs. Mainly, we
compute a lower bound for |h`i , `j i| when i and j are in the same cluster and hence a lower bound
for µ(L−1 ). We begin with a basic result for graphs from G(n, k, p, 0).
0
Theorem 6.1.
P Let A be the adjacency matrix of a graph G drawn at random from G(n, k, p, 0) and
define χi,j = k Aik Akj . Suppose further that there exists an α ∈ (0, 1) such that (1 − α)pn0 ≤ d0i ≤
(1 + α)pn0 . Then for any i, j ∈ C1 with i 6= j:
r
r
(1 + α)n0 p ln(1/δ)
(1 + α)n0 p ln(1/δ)
2
2
(1 − α)n0 p −
≤ χi,j ≤ (1 + α)n0 p +
(6.1)
2
2
with probability 1 − δ.
Proof. Let B1 (i) denote the ball of radius 1 centered at i. That is, B1 (i) := {k ∈ [n] : {i, k} ∈ E}.
By definition |B1 (i)| = di . Observe that:
X
X
χi,j =
Aik Akj =
Akj
k
k∈B1 (i)
Each Akj is an i.i.d. Bernoulli random variable with parameter p. Applying the Chernoff bound to
this sum:
q
2
di ln(1/δ)
r
2
2
X
di ln(1/δ)
P
Akj ≤ pdi −
≤ exp −
=δ
2
di
k∈B1 (i)
and (1 − α)pn0 ≤ di ≤ (1 + α)pn0 so:
#
#
"
"
r
r
(1
+
α)n
p
ln(1/δ)
d
ln(1/δ)
0
i
P χi,j ≤ (1 − α)n0 p2 −
≤ P χi,j ≤ pdi −
≤δ
2
2
The upper bound on χi,j is proved analogously.
We now provide a bound on the inner product |h`0i , `0j i| when i and j are in the same cluster:
Theorem 6.2. Let L0 be the Laplacian of a graph G0 drawn at random from G(n, k, p, 0). As in
Theorem 6.1, suppose that there exists an α ∈ (0, 1) such that (1 − α)pn0 ≤ d0i ≤ (1 + α)pn0 but
in addition assume that α is o(1) with respect to n. Define β 2 = (1 + α)/(1 − α). Then for any
δ ∈ (0, 1) and for any i, j ∈ Ca , a ∈ [k], with i 6= j:
s
2
β
1
ln(1/δ)
1
− 3/2
|h`0i , `0j i| ≥
n0 (1 + α)
2(1 + α)3 p3
n
0
with probability 1 − δ for n large enough.
Proof. Recall that
h`0i , `0j i
= −
1
1
+
di dj
17
Aij +
n
X
Aik Ajk
k=1
d2k
There are two possibilities; either i and j are connected ({i, j} ∈ E) or they are not ({i, j} ∈
/ E).
We treat these cases separately. Suppose first that {i, j} ∈
/ E. In this case, Aij = 0 and so:
h`0i , `0j i
=
n
X
Aik Ajk
d2k
k=1
≥
1
d2max
χij
by assumption, dmax ≤ (1 + α)pn0 and by so by Theorem 6.1:
!
r
1
(1 + α)n0 p ln(δ)
0 0
2
h`i , `j i ≥
(1 − α)n0 p − −
2
(1 + α)2 p2 n20
s
1
1
1
− ln(δ)
=
− 3/2
2
n0 (1 + α)β
2(1 + α)3 p3
n
(6.2)
0
Alternatively, suppose that {i, j} ∈ E. Then Aij = 1 and by Theorem 6.1:
2
1
−
χij
dmax
(1 + α)pn0 (1 − α)2 p2 n20
!
r
2
1
(1
+
α)n
p
ln(δ)
0
≥
−
(1 + α)n0 p2 + −
(1 + α)pn0 (1 − α)2 p2 n20
2
s
1
2
β2
1
− ln(δ)β 2
=
−
− 3/2
n0 (1 − α)p (1 + α)
2(1 − α)3 p3
n0
|h`0i , `0j i| ≥
2
−
1
χij
d2min
≥
(6.3)
Let us compare the leading terms in (6.2) and (6.3). Because α → 0 as n → ∞, β → 1 and thus
1/((1 + α)β) → 1. On the other hand, 2/((1 − α)p) − β 2 /(1 − α) → 2/p − 1 > 1, assuming p < 1.
Thus, for n large enough, the right hand side of (6.3) is larger than the right hand side of (6.2), and
so we can summarize both bounds as:
s
1
1
− ln(δ)
β2
0 0
|h`i , `j i| ≥
− 3/2
n0 (1 + α)
2(1
+ α)3 p3
n0
for large enough n.
Next we consider the case where intercluster edges are present, i.e. where q > 0.
Theorem 6.3. Let L be the Laplacian of G drawn from G(n, k, p, q), q > 0, and suppose that i, j ∈ C1 .
Assume further that:
1. p ≥ 4k(ln(n))2 /n
√
2. maxi ri ≤ r with r = r0 / n0 where r0 = O(1) with respect to n0 .
Then almost surely:
1
|h`i , `j i| ≥
n0
β2
1+α
− o(
1
).
n0
where α is o(1) with respect to n and β 2 = (1 + α)/(1 − α).
Proof. As before, let e1i (resp. e1j ) denote the i-th (resp. j-th) column of E1 , while e2i (resp. e2j )
denote the i-th (resp. j-th) column of E2 . Then:
h`i , `j i = h`0i + e1i + e2i , `0j + e1j + e2j i
= h`0i , `0j i + h`0i , e1j i + h`0i , e2j i + he1i , `0j i + he1i , e1j i + he1i , e2j i + he2i , `0j i + he2i , e1j i + he2i , e2j i
18
By construction, e1i and e2j have disjoint support (and similarly for e1j and e2i ), as do `0i and e2j (and
similarly `0j and e2i ). Hence:
h`0i , e2j i = he1i , e2j i = he2i , `0j i = he2i , e1j i = 0
and so:
|h`i , `j i| ≥ h`0i , `0j i − h`0i , e1j i − he1i , `0j i − he1i , e2j i − he2i , e2j i
(6.4)
Now `0i and `0j can be thought of as columns in the Laplacian of a graph drawn at random from
G(n, k, p, 0). By part 2 of Theorem 3.6 we may choose an α = o(1) with respect to n such that
(1 − α)pn0 ≤ d0i ≤ (1 + α)pn0 for all i, with probability 1 − 1/n. Now we apply Theorem 6.2 to get:
s
β2
1
− ln(δ)
1
0 0
− 3/2
|h`i , `j i| ≥
n0 (1 + α)
2(1
+ α)3 p3
n
0
√
−p3 n0
3√
(and noting e−p n0 < 1/n0 for large enough n0 )
with probability 1 − δ − 1/n. Taking δ = e
s
s
1/2
2
2
1
β
1
− ln(δ)
1
β
1
n0
− 3/2
=
− 3/2
n0 (1 + α)
2(1 + α)3 p3
n0 (1 + α)
2(1 + α)3
n0
n0
2
2
1
β
1
1
β
1
=
− 5/4 √
=
− o(1/n0 )
n0 1 + α
n0 1 + α
2(1 + α)3/2
n0
with probability at least 1 − 1/n0 − 1/n = 1 − (k + 1)/n. Next, we consider the term h`0i , e1j i.
!
0
0
X
r
A
ri A0ij X rm A0im A0mj
A
m
mj
3
|h`0i , e1j i| =
δim − 0im
+
O(r
)
=
+ O(r3 )
0 −
0
0 )2
d
d
(d
d
m
m
m
i
m
m
X
r
r
r
r
0
0
3
≤ 0 + 0 2
A A + O(r ) ≤ 0 + 0 2 min{d0i , d0j } + O(r3 )
dmin (dmin ) m im mj
dmin (dmin )
r
d0
≤ 0
1 + max
+ O(r3 )
dmin
d0min
As stated earlier, d0min ≥ (1 − α)pn0 and d0max ≤ (1 + α)pn0 with probability 1 − 1/n, and so:
r
(1 + α)pn0
r
0 1
|h`i , ej i| ≤
1+
+ O(r3 ) =
1 + β 2 + O(r3 )
(1 − α)pn0
(1 − α)pn0
(1 − α)pn0
Clearly the same bound holds for |he1i , `0j i|. Finally, consider |he1i , e1j i|. A similar calculation to the
one above reveals that:
r2
β4
1 1
|hei , ej i| ≤
+ O(r4 )
n0 (1 − α)p
as well as:
|he2i , e2j i| ≤
r
+ O(r3 )
(1 − α)pn0
Putting all these bounds back in to equation (6.4), we get:
2
1
β
1
2r(1 + β 2 )
r2
β4
r
3
4
3
|h`i , `j i| ≥
− o( ) −
+ O(r ) +
+ O(r ) +
+ O(r )
n0 1 + α
n0
(1 − α)pn0
n0 (1 − α)p
(1 − α)pn0
2
1
β
r 2(1 + β 2 )
rβ 4
1
=
−
+
+
+ O(r3 )
n0 1 + α
n0 (1 − α)p
(1 − α)p (1 − α)p
19
√
3/2
Using the assumption that r = r0 / n0 , we see that r/n0 = r0 /n0 which is of order o(1/n0 ).
3/2
Similarly r3 = r03 /n0 which is also of order o(1/n0 ). Thus:
2
1
β
1
|h`i , `j i| ≥
− o( )
n0 1 + α
n0
with probability 1 − O(1/n0 ), as claimed.
Remark 6.4.
Since
the coherence µ of L is defined as µ = maxi6=j |h`i , `j i|. Theorem 6.3 also implies
β2
1
thatµ ≥ n0 1+α − o( n10 ).
7
Compressive Sensing Clustering for Graphs from G(n, k, p, 0)
In this section, we consider graphs from G(n, k, p, 0). This is the case that there are no inter-cluster
edges. We may safely assume that each GCi is connected, as long as p > ln(n0 )/n0 .
Lemma 7.1. Let L be the Laplacian of a graph with k connected components C1 , . . . , Ck . Assume,
without loss of generality, that vertex 1 ∈ C1 . Define x# as:
x# := arg min{kxk0 : x ∈ Rn , Lx = 0 and x1 = 1}
(7.1)
Then x# = 1C1
Proof. From Theorem 3.3, ker(L) = span{1C1 , . . . , 1Ck } and hence any x with Lx = 0 can be
P
written as: x = ki=1 ci 1Ci . If x1 = 1 (recall we are assuming that 1 ∈ C1 ) then c1 = 1 and so
P
x = 1C1 + ki=2 ci 1Ci . Recall that all the 1Ci have disjoint support, and so clearly the sparsest
solution x such that Lx = 0 is that x has c2 = c3 = . . . = ck = 0. Hence indeed x# = 1C1
One can rephrase this slightly as a standard compressed sensing problem. Recall `i is the i-th
column of L and L−i := [`1 , . . . , `i−1 , `i+1 , . . . , `n ] in which case:
xi = 1
⇔
L−i x−i = −`i ,
where if x = [x1 , x2 , . . . , xn ]> ∈ Rn , x−i = [x1 , . . . , xi−1 , xi+1 , . . . , xn ]> ∈ Rn−1 . Thus problem (7.1)
becomes:
x# := arg min{kxk0 : x ∈ Rn−1 , Lx = −`1 }.
(7.2)
We now show that problem (7.2) can be efficiently solved using OMP (Algorithm 2 in §4)
Theorem 7.2. Suppose that G ∈ G(n, k, p, 0) has k connected components C1 , . . . , Ck ⊂ V each of
size n0 . OMP (Algorithm 2) applied to the sparse recovery problem (7.2) will return x# = 1C1 \{1}
after n0 − 1 iterations. C1 can then be recovered as {1} ∪ supp(x# ).
Remark 7.3. Note that the assumption that G ∈ G(n, k, p, 0) is not necessary; this theorem holds
for all graphs with k connected components. Also, observe that this theorem is not probabilistic. It
holds with certainty for all graphs G.
We shall appeal to the exact recovery condition, Theorem 4.1 to establish Theorem 7.2. Let us
begin with
Lemma 7.4. If C1 ⊂ V is a connected component then LC1 \{1} is injective, where LC1 \{1} is the
submatrix from L with column indices in C1 \ {1}.
20
L1−1
Proof. First, observe that LC1 \{1} =
, where L1 is the Laplacian of GC1 . It suffices to
0
show that L1−1 is injective. As GC1 is connected, ker(L1 ) = span{1}, by Theorem 3.2. Suppose
there exists a u ∈ Rn0 −1 , u 6= 0 such that L1−1 u = 0. Then [0, u> ]> is in ker(L1 ) = span{1}, a
contradiction.
Theorem 7.5. With notation as above (i.e. C1 is the connected component of G containing the first
vertex) we have that:
kL†C1 \{1} LC1c k1 = 0
(7.3)
Proof. By Lemma 7.4 LC1 \{1} is injective so its pseudo-inverse is given by:
−1
L
L†C1 \{1} = L>
L>
C1 \{1} C1 \{1}
C1 \{1}
1
0
L−1
As observed in the proof of Lemma 7.4, LC1 \{1} =
. Similarly, LC1c =
, where L̃ denotes
0
L̃
the Laplacian of GC1c . In both cases 0 denotes the zero matrix of appropriate size. To show (7.3) it
c
will suffice to show that L>
C1 \{1} LC1 = 0, but this follows easily as:
0
(L1−1 )> 0>
= (L1−1 )> 0 + 0> L̃ = 0
L̃
This completes the proof.
Theorem 7.2 now follows easily:
Proof. [Proof of Theorem 7.2] By Theorem 7.5 the exact recover condition (Theorem 4.1) holds ,
and thus the result follows.
8
Compressive Sensing Clustering for Graphs from G(n, k, p, q)
We now turn our attention to the same problem for G(n, k, p, q) with 0 < q << p. We follow the
notation established in §5.3, and decompose A as A = A0 + A where A contains the intercluster
edges and A0 is the adjacency matrix of the subgraph G0 with k connected components. Denoting
the i-th column of L0 as `0i and the i-th column of E as ei , observe that
`1 = `01 + e1 = −L0 1C1 \{1} + e1
or
− `1 = L1C1 \{1} − e1 .
Defining x# as:
x# := arg min{kL−1 x − (−`1 )k2 : x ∈ Rn−1 , kxk0 ≤ n0 }.
(8.1)
Then x# ≈ 1C1 \{1} . We recognize this as a totally perturbed sparse recovery problem (4.7), with
Φ = L0 , Φ̂ = L0 + E = L, y = −`1 = −`01 − e1 . We shall show that, provided E is small enough,
supp(x# ) = supp(1C1 \{1} ) = C1 \ {1}. Hence, solving problem (8.1) is equivalent to finding the
community C1 .
Unfortunately, a straightforward application of Algorithm 2 to (8.1) does not work. Empirically,
it is observed that the first several greedy steps in Algorithm 2 invariably pick up wrong indices due
to the presence of noise E. We need a new approach. Let us start with the following
Theorem 8.1. Let L be the Laplacian of a graph G ∈ G(n, k, p, q) with p ≥ 4k(ln(n))2 /n. Suppose
that
max ri := max di /d0i ≤ r,
(8.2)
i∈{1,...,n}
i∈{1,··· ,n}
√
where r = r0 / n0 with r0 a constant independent of n0 . Define Ω := Ld10(n0 −1)/9e (L>
−1 `1 ). For n0
large enough, we have that C1 \ {1} ⊂ Ω almost surely.
21
Proof. Suppose otherwise, then there exists an i∗ ∈ C1 \ {1} not in Ω. Let Λ = Ω ∩ C1c . As we are
assuming that C1 \ {1} 6⊂ Ω, we have that |Λ| ≥ n0 /9. Moreover, by definition of i∗ , we have that
|h`1 , `i∗ i| ≤ |h`1 , `j i| for all j ∈ Ω, and in particular:
|h`1 , `i∗ i| ≤ |h`1 , `j i| for all j ∈ Λ
Summing over Λ we get:
|Λ||h`1 , `i∗ i| ≤
X
|h`1 , `j i| = kL>
Λ `1 k 1
(8.3)
j∈Λ
We shall show that equation (8.3) cannot hold for n0 large enough. Because p ≥ 4k(ln(n))2 /n and
r << 1, we may use Theorem 5.8, which we shall do repeatedly. By this theorem, we have that
L = L0 + E = L0 + E1 + E2 with kEj k∞ ≤ r = O(r2 ) for j = 1, 2. Moreover by construction
0
L0Λ =
where L̃ denotes the Laplacian of the subgraph GC1c and 0 is the zero matrix of size
L̃Λ
1
`
n0 × |Λ|. Similarly, `1 = `01 + e1 and we may write `01 = 1 where `11 ∈ Rn0 is the first column of
0
1
L , the Laplacian of the subgraph GC1 and 0 is the zero vector of length n − n0 . Thus:
0 > 0
0 >
> 1
kL>
Λ `1 k1 ≤ k(LΛ ) `1 k1 + k(LΛ ) e1 k1 + kE ` k1
1
`1
+ k(L0Λ )> e1 k1 + kE> `1 k1
= 0> L̃>
Λ
0
≤ 0 + k(L0Λ )> k1 ke1 k1 + kE> k1 k`1 k1
(8.4)
Now k(L0Λ )> k1 = kL0Λ k∞ , as these are dual norms. As k · k∞ is equal to the maximum absolute row
sum, it is clear that kL0Λ k∞ ≤ kL0 k∞ . Now:
0
X
X
A
1
1
ij
0
0
0
kL k∞ = max
δij − 0 = max 1 + 0
Aij = max 1 + 0 (di ) = 2
i
i
i
d
d
di
i
i
j
j6=i
Moreover, ke1 k1 ≤ maxi kei k1 = kEk1 , hence ke1 k1 ≤ 2β 2 r + O(r2 ), while kE> k1 = kEk∞ ≤
kE1 k∞ + kE2 k∞ = 2r + O(r2 ) both by Theorem 5.8. Finally, `1 = `01 + e1 as above, so k`1 k ≤
k`01 k1 + β 2 r + O(r2 ). We compute k`01 k1 :
k`01 k1 =
n
X
i=1
n
δi1 −
X A0
A0i1
1
(1 + α)pn0
i1
(d01 ) ≤ 1 +
= 1 + β2
=
1
+
≤1+
0
0
d
(1
−
α)pn
di
d
min
0
i
i=2
Returning to equation (8.4):
2
2
2
2
2
kL>
Λ `1 k1 ≤ (2)(2β r) + (2r)(1 + β ) + O(r ) = (2 + 6β )r + O(r ) =
On the other hand, by Theorem 6.3 we have that:
2
1
β
1
− o( )
|h`1 , `i∗ i| ≥
n0 1 + α
n0
22
(2 + 6β 2 )r0
+ O(r2 )
√
n0
almost surely, and so we can bound the left hand side of (8.3) as:
2
β
1
β2
n0 1
∗
− o( ) =
|Λ||h`1 , `i i| ≥
− o(1)
9 n0 1 + α
n0
9(1 + α)
Thus, if inequality (8.3) were true, it would imply that:
β2
(2 + 6β 2 )r0
+ O(r2 )
− o(1) ≤
√
9(1 + α)
n0
which cannot be true for n0 large enough, as α and r are o(1) with respect to n0 and β 2 is O(1), thus
√
β 2 /(9(1 + α)) − o(1) → 1/9 while (2 + 6β 2 )r0 / n0 → 0. Hence we may always take n0 large enough
so that, with probability at least 1 − 1/n0 , inequality (8.3) cannot hold. Thus no such i∗ which is in
C1 \ {1} but not in Ω can be found, and so the Theorem 8.1 is proved.
With the result of Theorem 8.1 in mind, we are able to derive a new algorithm to find the
communities from G ∈ G(n, k, p, q) for p >> q > 0:
Algorithm 4 Single Cluster Pursuit (SCP)
Input: The adjacency matrix A of a graph G, and estimate of the size of clusters n0
(1) Initialization Compute L = I − D−1 A.
(2) Trimming
Let Ω = Ld10(n0 −1)/9e (L>
−1 `1 )
(3) Perturbed Sparse Recovery
P
(a) y = i∈Ω `i + `1
(b) Solve z# = arg min{kLΩ z − yk2 s.t. z ∈ R|Ω| and kzk0 ≤ n0 /9} using the SP algorithm
(c) Λ# = supp(z# ).
Output: C1# = {1} ∪ Ω \ Λ# .
Next we show that Algorithm 4 succeeds almost surely.
Theorem 8.2. Let G be a graph drawn at random from the G(n, k, p, q) model. Suppose that k = O(1)
with respect to n and either:
1. q =
Q
n
and p =
√
P ln(n)
n ln(ln(n))
with Q and P being constants and P > 979, or
with Q → ∞ as n → ∞ and p =
2. q = Q ln(n)
n
large enough n.
P ln(n)
√
n
with P → ∞ as n → ∞ and
Q
P
<
1
979
for
Then Algorithm 4 will recover C1 (that is, C1# = C1 ) almost surely.
Proof. For notational convenience let s := (n0 − 1)/9. In both cases, p ≥ 4k(ln(n))2 /n and so by
part 2 of Theorem 3.6, d0min ≥ (1 − α)n0 p almost surely for α = o(1) with respect to n. In case 1,
by (i) of Theorem 3.4 in [25], dmax ≤ ln(n)/(ln(ln(n)) − ln(ln(ln(n))) almost surely. Ignoring the
triple-logarithmic term:
d
d
1
r0
max 0i ≤ max
≤
√ =: √
i di
P (1 − α) n0
n0
d0min
with r0 < 1/979 for large enough n as α = o(1). In case 2, by (ii) of Theorem 3.4 in [25], dmax ≤
Q ln(n) almost surely, and so:
max
i
di
dmax
Q/P
r0
≤
≤
√ =: √
0
0
(1
−
α)
n
n0
di
dmin
0
23
and again r0 < 1/979 for large enough n. We may thus apply Theorem 8.1 to get that C1 \ {1} ⊂ Ω
almost surely. As before we define Λ := Ω ∩ C1c ; it is easy to see |Λ| ≤ n0 /9. The challenge in step (3)
of Algorithm 4 is to separate C1 \ {1} from Λ. We do this by solving for 1Λ = 1Ω − 1C1 \{1} instead
of 1C1 \{1} , as:
X
L0Ω 1Λ = L0Ω 1Ω − 1C1 \{1} = L0Ω 1Ω − L0Ω 1C1 \{1} =
`0i − (−`01 ) =: y0
(8.5)
i∈Ω
and noting that k1Λ k0 ≤ n0 /9, we see that 1Λ is the unique solution to
arg min{kL0Ω z − y0 k2 : z ∈ Rd10n0 /9e , kzk0 ≤ n0 /9}
(8.6)
Defining y to be a perturbation of y0 and writing, as in §5.3, LΩ = L0Ω + EΩ :
!
y :=
X
i∈Ω
Defining e = e1 +
P
i∈Ω ei
`i + `1 =
X
`0i +
i∈Ω
X
ei + `01 + e1 = y0 +
e1 +
i∈Ω
X
ei
i∈Ω
we recognize the problem:
z# = arg min{kLΩ z − yk2 : z ∈ Rd10n0 /9e , kzk0 ≤ n0 /9}
(8.7)
as a totally perturbed version of (8.6). Thus, we may apply the results of §4.3 to bound kz# − 1Λ k2 .
As in §4.3, we define δt := δt (L0 ) and δ̂t := δt (L). (We refer the reader to §4.3 for the definitions of
sL0 , y , ρ̂ and τ̂ .) Let us bound on these quantities. Observe that in both cases, p >> (ln(n0 ))2 /n0
and by assumption k is O(1) with respect to n, thus as in the proof of Theorem 5.10 we get sL0 =
√
8βr/3 = 8βr0 /(3 n0 ), for n0 large enough. Applying the result of Theorem 5.10 with t = 3s = n0 /3:
1
D2
D3 r
1
+ D1 r + √ + √ + O(r2 ) + o( √ )
3
n0
n0
n0
1 (D1 r0 + D2 ) D3 r0
1
1
1 (D1 r0 + D2 )
1
= +
+
+ O( ) + o( √ ) = +
+ o( √ ).
√
√
3
n0
n0
n0
n0
3
n0
n0
δ̂3s ≤
Hence for large enough n0 , we certainly have δ̂3s ≤ 0.4859 as required. In fact, let us take n0 large
enough such that δ̂3s ≤ 1/3 + 1/18 = 7/18 ≈ 0.39. Choosing n0 larger if necessary, we shall also
assume that sL0 < 1/3. In this case, a straightforward, but tedious calculation will reveal that
ρ̂ ≤ 0.7 and similarly τ̂ < 166 (see the statement of Theorem 4.6 for the definitions of ρ̂ and τ̂ ). We
now turn our attention to y .
p
p
√
ky0 k2 = kL0Ω1 1Λ k2 ≥ 1 − δs k1Λ k2 = 1 − δs s
while
kek2 = kE1Ω + e1 k2 ≤ kEk2 k1Ω∪{1} k2 ≤ 2βr + O(r2 )
So we have
√
10s.
√
√
2 10 2βr + O(r2 )
kek2
2 10βr0
1
√
y :=
=
=p
+ o( √ )
0
ky k2
n0
1 − δs
n0 (1 − δs )
Appealing to Theorem 5.10 with s = n0 /9:
δs ≤ 1/9 +
64p−1/2
1
+ o( √ ).
√
9 n0
n0
24
Again, we will assume that n0 is large enough such that δs ≤ 2/9 ≈ 0.22. Under this assumption:
√
βr0
2 10 βr0
y ≤ p
√ ≤ 8√
n0
7/9 n0
Finally, we use Theorem 5.10 again, this time with t = s = n0 /9:
δ̂s ≤ 1/9 +
1
D1 r0 + D2
+ o( √ )
√
n0
n0
and take n0 large enough such that δ̂s ≤ 2/9 (this is possible as D1 and D2 are O(1) with respect to
n0 ). Now Theorem 4.6 guarantees that
!
p
kxm − 1Λ k2
1 + δ̂s
≤ τ̂
+ 1 (sL0 + y )
k1Λ k2
1 − sL0
Where m := ln(sL0 + y )/ ln(ρ̂) = O(ln(n0 )). Substituting in for the various constants:
!
p
√
1 + 2/9
kxm − 1Λ k2
8βr0
166( 11)(32) βr0
8βr0
=
< (166)
√ +√
√
k1Λ k2
1 − 1/3
3 n0
n0
6
n0
√
n0
βr0
2937 √ = 979βr0
⇒kxm − 1Λ k2 <
3
n0
As the Lemma 8.3 below, as long as kxm − 1Λ k2 < 1, we have that supp(xm ) = supp(1Λ ). Because
β → 1 and r0 < 1/979, this will hold for large enough n0 .
Lemma 8.3. Suppose that x∗ ∈ Rn is a binary vector with kx∗ k0 = t, and x ∈ Rn is any other
vector that also has kxk0 = t. If kx∗ − xk2 < 1 then supp(x) = supp(x∗ ).
Proof. Suppose otherwise. Then there exists an i ∈ supp(x∗ ) \ supp(x). Clearly:
kx∗ − xk2 ≥ |x∗i − xi | = |1 − 0| = 1
which contradicts the hypotheses.
As mentioned in the introduction, we may iterate Algorithm 4 to find all the clusters of G. We
call this algorithm Iterated Single Cluster Pursuit, or ISCP.
9
Computational Complexity and Extensions
In this section we bound the computational complexity and explain some extensions.
9.1
Computational Complexity
In this subsection we show that Algorithm 4 is faster than existing spectral methods. We do this by
determining the approximate number of operations required in each step of Algorithm 4. Throughout,
we shall assume that A and L are sparse matrices.
P
1. Computing di = j Aij requires di operations. We can safely assume that di = d0i + di ≤ n0
so the cost of computing each di is at most O(n0 ) This needs to be done a total of n times to
compute D = diag(d1 , . . . , dn ), giving a total cost of O(nn0 ).
25
2. The cost of the thresholding step is dominated by the matrix-vector multiply L>
−1 `1 . Because
`1 has d1 + 1 ≤ n0 non-zero entries, the cost of this is bounded by O(nn0 ).
3. The computational cost of solving the perturbed sparse recovery problem in step 3 using SP
is equal to the number of iteration times the cost of each iteration. As shown in the proof of
Theorem 8.2, it suffices to perform O(ln(n0 )) = O(ln(n)) iterations. The cost of each iteration
is determined by calculating the cost of each step in the iterative part of SP (see Algorithm 3):
k−1 ) is dominated by the cost of the matrix-vector multiply L> rk−1 ,
(a) Computing Ls (L>
Ωr
Ω
hence is O(nn0 ).
(b) Solving the least square problem in step (2) using a good numerical solver (we used
MATLAB’s lsqr algorithm) is on the order of the cost of a matrix-vector multiply, i.e.
O(nn0 ), as explained in [38].
(c) The cost of sorting and thresholding (step (3)) is O(n ln(n)).
(d) Finally the cost of computing the new residual rk in step (4) is dominated by the matrix
k
vector multiply L>
Ω1 r , hence is O(nn0 ).
We conclude that the cost of a single iteration of the SP Algorithm is O(nn0 ), and so the cost
of step 3 of Algorithm 4 is O(n ln(n)n0 )
Thus, the number of computations required to find a single cluster using Algorithm 4 is O(n ln(n)n0 ).
To find all the clusters C1 , . . . , Ck one can iterate Algorithm 4 k − 1 times. The cost of this is
certainly less than O(kn ln(n)n0 ) = O(n2 ln(n)).
9.2
Extensions
1. Our Algorithm 4 can be extended to deal with the communities of non-equal size. Hence, our
study can be extended too. A numerical example is included in the next section to demonstrate
this extension. For simplicity, we leave the study for the interested reader.
2. Although Algorithm 4 works on binary adjacency matrices, it handles weighted adjacency
matrices just as well (see §10.2.2).
3. As mentioned in the introduction, graph clustering can also be applied to more general data
sets. Given any (finite) set of points X = {x1 , . . . , xn } in some metric space (M, d), there
are several ways to associate a graph on n vertices to X. For example, we could attach an
edge between vertices i and j whenever d(xi , xj ) ≤ C for some constant C. Alternatively, for
each vertex i we could determine the K closest points to xi , say {xj1 , . . . , xjK }, and insert the
edges {i, j1 }, . . . , {i, jK } to obtain the K-nearest neighbours graph GK . Empirically, we have
found the latter approach to perform better, as dmin (GK ) = K giving better control over the
quantities ri crucial to the analysis of Algorithm 4. See §10.2.2 for an example of this approach.
4. Algorithm 4 can easily be extended to the co-clustering problem, as described in [15]. Briefly
suppose that we are given two categorically different sets of variables X = {x1 , . . . , xn } and
Y = {y1 , . . . , ym } as well as a n × m matrix B such that the Bij -th entry represents the
correlation between xi and yj . The goal of co-clustering is to simultaneously partition X
and Y into subsets X = X1 ∪ . . . Xk and Y = Y1 ∪ . . . ∪ Yk such that the correlations
between x ∈ Xi and y ∈ Yi are strong while the correlations between x ∈ Xi and y ∈ Yj for
i 6= j are weak. As pointed out by Dhillon in [15], one can regard this as a graph clustering
26
problem for a weighted5 bipartite graph with vertex set V = {u1 , . . . , un , v1 , . . . , vm } and
weights w(ui , vj ) = Bij , w(ui , uj ) = w(vi , vj ) = 0. The adjacency matrix and Laplacian of G
are:
0 B
In×n
−D−1
B
X
A=
L=
>
B> 0
−D−1
Im×m
Y B
where DX represents the row sums of B while DY represents the column sums. Assume
temporarily that instead of clusters G has k connected components C1 , . . . , Ck . Each GCi will
be a bipartite graph, and Ci splits as Ci = CiX ∪ CiY where CiX corresponds to Xi and similarly
> >
CiY corresponds to Yi . The indicator vector will split similarly: 1Ci = [1>
Xi 1Yi ] and:
1Xi − D−1
X B1Yi
=
−1 >
1Yi − DY B 1Xi
0 = L1Ci
We may convert these two ‘first-order’ equations into a single ‘second-order’ equation as 1Yi =
>
D−1
Y B 1Xi and so:
−1 >
−1
−1 >
0 = 1Xi − D−1
BD
B
1
=
I
−
D
BD
B
1Xi
X
i
X
Y
X
Y
−1 >
Defining the ‘bi-partite Laplacian’ as LBP = I − D−1
X BDY B we see that if x1 ∈ X1 then the
indicator vector 1X1 is the unique solution to:
arg min{kzk0 :
z ∈ Rn , LBP z = 0 and z1 = 1}
−1 >
once we have found 1X1 we can recover 1Y1 as 1Y1 = DY
B 1X1 . Returning to the clustering
problem, we see that we may approximate 1X1 ( and hence 1Yi ) by solving the problem
arg min{kLBP
−1 z − (−`BP,1 )k2 :
z ∈ Rn−1 , kzk0 ≤ nX
0 − 1}
using Algorithm 4, where nX
0 is the size of the clusters Xi . We leave the technical analysis of
this approach to the interested reader.
5. In future work, we intend to show how Algorithm 4 can be adapted into an ‘online’ algorithm
which allows one to rapidly update the community assignments as more vertices are added to
the graph.
10
Numerical Examples
10.1
Synthetic Data
We tested Single Cluster Pursuit (SCP, Algorithm 4) on graphs drawn from the SBM. We implemented this algorithm in MATLAB 2016b and run on a mid-2010 iMac computer with 8 GB of RAM and
a 3.06 GHz Intel Core i3 processor. For comparison we used the Trembley, Puy, Gribonval and Vandergheynst implementation of Spectral Clustering (SC, Algorithm 1) included in their Compressive
Spectral Clustering toolbox available at http://cscbox.gforge.inria.fr/ ([45]).
5
We assume that the correlations Bij are non-negative
27
10.1.1
Example 1
Typical output of SCP applied to randomly drawn graphs from the SMB G(n, k, p, q) with p =
√
P ln(n)/ n and q = Q ln(n)/n as in case 2 of Theorem 8.2 is shown in the third frame of figure 1.
Both SCP and SC succeed in finding cluster 1 without error (indeed SC finds all clusters without
error) but SCP is faster, taking 0.0262 seconds compared to the 0.1018 seconds required by SC. We
remark that even for Q, P such that Q/P >> 1/979 SCP is successful, suggesting that the bounds
in Theorem 8.2 are too conservative.
√
, 2 ln(n)
Figure 1: The adjacency matrix of a graph drawn from G(1000, 5, 2 ln(n)
n ) is shown in the top
n
left. The same matrix, with its rows and columns randomly permuted (using the same permutation
for both) is shown in the top right. The output of SCP applied to the permuted matrix is shown in
the bottom left, while the output of SC on the same matrix is shown on the bottom right.
10.1.2
Example 2
We then tested Iterated SCP (ISCP) for graphs randomly drawn from the SBM G(n, k, p, q) with
√
p = P ln(n)/ n and q = Q ln(n)/n. Typical output is shown in Figure 2. Again, both algorithms
are successful (that is, both find all 10 communities without error).
28
√
Figure 2: The adjacency matrix of a graph drawn at random from G(5000, 10, 4 ln(n)
, 4 ln(n)
n ) is shown
n
in the top left. The same matrix, with its rows and columns randomly permuted (using the same
permutation for both) is shown in the top right. The output of SCP applied to the permuted matrix
is shown in the bottom left, while the output of SC on the same matrix is shown on the bottom
right.
10.1.3
Example 3
Next, we tested the resilience of SCP to noise by running it on G drawn at random from G(2400, 6, 0.5, q)
with q increasing from 0 to 150/2000. For each q, we ran SCP on 10 different G drawn independently and at random from G(2400, 6, 0.5, q) and computed the average fraction of indices that were
misclassified. Figure 3 shows the result of this experiment, with E[di ] = q(n − n0 ) on the x-axis.
As observed in Experiment 1, SCP performs much better than theoretically guaranteed by Theorem
8.2. Indeed, Figure 3 demonstrates that SCP detects community 1 without error up until E[di ] = 40,
at which r ≈ 40/200 = 1/5.
29
Figure 3: Fraction of indices misclassified by SCP, for G ∈ G(2400, 6, 0.5, Q/2000). The horizontal
axis represents Q, that is, the level of ‘noise’ in the graph. The vertical axis represents the fraction
of misclassified vertices = |C1# \ C1 |/|C1# |. As can be seen, SCP performs without error until Q ≈ 40,
well beyond the theoretical guarantees given by Theorem 8.2
10.1.4
Example 5
In our final example, we use ISCP to solve the co-clustering problem, as discussed in §9.2. Typical
output is shown in image 4
Figure 4: A 2000 × 1000 binary matrix with 10 equally sized block, randomly permuted and then
co-clustered using ISCP, applied as discussed in §9.2.
10.1.5
Example 4
Finally we compared the run times of SCP, SC and ISCP on G(n, k, p, q) for increasing n. We studied
√
three regimes: constant k, constant n0 (cluster size) and k, n0 = O( n). In all three cases we fixed
√
p = 2 log(n)/ n and q = 2 log(n)/n. The results of these experiments are presented in figures 5c
- 5b (the run times are in seconds, and are the average of ten independent trials for the same n).
As is clear, SCP significantly outperforms SC in finding a single cluster. Moreover, when k is large
enough compared to the number of vertices (n), ISCP finds all clusters faster than SC.
30
(a) Varying k from 20 to 120 and n accordingly, while fixing n0 . G ∈ G 400k, k,
(b) Varying k, n0 and n. G ∈ G kn0 , k,
2 log(n) 2 log(n)
√
, n
n
log(n)
(c) Varying n and n0 while fixing k. G ∈ G n, 40, 2√
,
(n)
2 log(n) 2 log(n)
√
, n
n
2 log(n)
n
Figure 5: Comparing SCP, ISCP and SC for graphs drawn from the SBM of increasing size. As can
be seen, SCP is significantly faster than SC
31
10.2
Real Data Sets
We now present two examples of SCP and ISCP applied to real-world data sets.
10.2.1
Political Blogs Data Set
The polblogs data set is a collection of 1494 political weblogs, or blogs, collected by Adamic and
Glance ([4]) prior to the 2004 American presidential election. The data is presented as an unweighted,
undirected graph, with vertices corresponding to the blogs, and edges between blogs i and j if there
is a hyperlink from i to j, or vice versa. This data set is well-studied (see, for example [32], [39] and
[42], amongst others), and is a good test case for at least two reasons:
1. In addition to a natural division into two roughly equally sized clusters (liberal vs. conservative), the data set exhibits additional clustering at smaller scales. That is, within the set of
all liberal blogs, one can identify subclusters of blogs, and similarly for the conservative blogs.
This is explored further in [42].
2. The ground truth for the division into liberal vs. conservative is known, as Adamic and Glance
([4]) manually labelled the data set. This provides an opportunity to verify one’s results that
is rare for real-world data sets.
Our methodology was as follows. We follow Olhede and Wolfe ([42]) in using only the 1224 blogs
with links to at least one other blog in the data set. As SCP can be thrown off by low degree vertices
( these will have high values of ri ) we experimented with different thresholds. That is, we discarded
vertices of degree lower than dthresh for varying values of dthresh . We then used SCP to detect a
cluster containing an arbitrary liberal blog, of size approximately equal to the number of liberal
blogs. We call this cluster Cluster 1 (C1 ). We call the remaining vertices Cluster 2 C2 . The results
are tabulated in ??. We record the number of vertices left after thresholding, the percentage of the
first cluster consisting of liberal blogs, the percentage of the second cluster consisting of conservative
blogs and the time taken. The values shown are the averages of ten independent runs.
dthresh
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
# of vertices
1224
1087
903
813
735
693
644
596
547
505
% of C1 liberal
63.71
71.57
81.45
89.12
91.95
93.14
93.95
93.05
94.24
93.97
% of C2 conservative
66.93
75.68
83.86
91.06
93.69
94.57
95.32
94.66
95.39
94.87
time (in seconds)
0.0380
0.0928
0.0467
0.0479
0.0428
0.0411
0.0256
0.0377
0.0379
0.0225
Table 1: Results of SCP applied to the polblogs data set for varying degree thresholds. When
dthresh = 10 the fraction of cluster 1 classified as liberal, and the fraction of cluster 2 identified as
conservative, closely resemble the compositions reported by Newman in [39]
As is clear, increasing dthresh above 10 makes little difference. Our results also agree with the
clusters found by Newman in [39], where he finds one cluster which is 93% liberal, and a second
32
cluster which is 97% conservative. Of course, to achieve this accuracy we have had to discard over
40% of our data points. An interesting future line of research would be to improve the handling of
low degree vertices by SCP.
To detect clustering at a finer scale, we ran SCP to find a cluster of size 80 containing a randomly
selected liberal blog (smithersmpls.com). The output of this is shown in figure 7. As can be seen
by the increased density of the top-left hand corner, our algorithm finds a subset of blogs containing
smithersmpls.com that are more densely connected to each other than they are to the rest of the
data set. We remark that this experiment took approximately 0.06 seconds, so with even modest
computational resources one could investigate clustering at a large range of scales in such a data set.
Figure 6: Typical Output of SCP applied to the polblogs data set with dthresh = 10.
Figure 7: Detecting fine scale structure in the polblogs data set. The top left hand corner represents
a sub-cluster of 80 liberal blogs containing a given randomly selected liberal blog.
33
10.2.2
Gene Expression Data Set
Our second data set consists of Gene Expression values collected via Microarray for a sample of
Neurospora crassa at 13 different time points, originally studied in [16]. The data consists of 2436
time series, one for each Gene of interest, consisting of 13 scaled expression readings. Each scaled
expression reading is a floating point number between 4 and 13. We treat this data as a set of 2436
data points X = {x1 , . . . , x2436 } in R13 . We then constructed an Affinity
Matrix A1 as suggested
√
in [41] defined as A1ij = exp(−kxi − xj k22 /σ 2 ). Here σ was chosen to be 10 although we note that
experimenting with other values of σ did not qualitatively change the results.
To promote sparsity, we added the additional step of constructing a K-nearest-neighbours adjacency matrix from A1 by retaining the (weighted) edge {i, j} if and only if xj is among the K
nearest neighbours of xi or vice versa. Call the resulting adjacency matrix A2,K . We remark that,
much like the parameter σ used in constructing A1 , varying K did not qualitatively affect the results
obtained. Thus, we shall fix K = 100 and refer to A2,100 simply as A2 . Figure 8 shows the results
of this preprocessing in reverse-grayscale (that is, larger values are darker).
Figure 8: The adjacency matrix A2 , resulting from preprocessing the Gene Expression Data set
originally studied in [16].
We used ISCP to look for clusters on two different scales, informed by the underlying biology of
34
the data set6 . First, we looked for clusters of size 90 − 100, as this is around the number of genes
targeted by a single regulator in N. crassa. The results of this experiment are shown in figure 9.
In a well studied organism such as N. crassa, the functions of many genes are known. In fact of the
2436 genes in this data set, more than half of them (1442) have been assigned a MIPS label, which is
an hierarchical system for labelling genes by function. Moreover, in [16], the genes in this data set are
grouped into twelve categories according to their functions, for example ‘signaling’ or ‘transcriptional
control and regulation’. Biologically, an interesting question is which functional categories cluster
together. Thus, for our second numerical experiment we used ISCP to detect clusters of size 450−550
(results pictured in Figure 10) and recorded the number of genes of each category 7 occurring in each
cluster. We can assess the biological significance of this clustering by performing a chi-squared test.
The null hypothesis is that there is no relation between the clusters and the functional categories,
in which the expected number of genes in Category j contained in Cluster i, in the notation of
R
Table ??, is Eij = TC
j × (Ti /1442). For example, E12 = 164 × (321/1442) = 36.51 Denoting the
observed
(i.e. O12 = 32, O21 = 19 and so on) we compute the chi-squared test statistic
P P counts by Oij
2
as i j (Eij − Oij ) /Eij = 73.87. From a table of values for the χ2 distribution8 , we get that
assuming the null hypothesis there is a 0.1% chance that this statistic is greater than 73.40. Thus,
we may safely reject the null hypothesis, and assume that the Clustering found by ISCP is related
to the functions of the genes in the data set.
Category
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
TR
Cluster size
1
2
3
4
5
13
19
13
15
20
32
36
23
32
41
15
18
21
14
19
22
28
33
17
31
42
24
34
22
35
46
37
57
27
26
36
11
10
17
18
19
10
13
2
15
8
12
11
5
9
20
25
32
22
13
68
70
71
47
66
321
290
318
220
293
527
513
452
554
390
TC
80
164
87
131
157
193
92
59
45
112
322
1442
2436
Cluster
Table 2: The number of genes in each category present in each cluster. The row totals represent
the number of genes with a MIPS classifier present in each cluster (the total number of genes with
a MIPS classifier is 1442). Anomalously high or low counts are shown in bold.
6
and the authors gratefully acknowledge many informative discussions with Professor Jonathan Arnold and his lab
For a description of the categories the reader is referred to [16]. The counts are displayed in Table ??. The
categories are numbered by the order in which they appear in figure 15 in [16], omitting the category ‘clock’ as there
are no MIPS codes associated with this category.
8
Note that there are (#rows − 1)(#columns − 1) = 40 degrees of freedom here
7
35
Figure 9: Output of ISCP applied to A2 , set to find clusters of size 90 − 100.
Figure 10: Output of ICSP applied to A2 , set to find clusters of size 450 − 550.
36
References
[1] E. Abbe, Community detection and stochastic block models: recent developments, arXiv
preprint arXiv:1703.10146 (2017).
[2] E. Abbe, A.S. Bandeira, and G. Hall, Exact recovery in the stochastic block model, IEEE
transactions on Information Theory Vol. 62 no. 1, pp. 471-487 (2016).
[3] E. Abbe and C. Sandon, Community detection in general stochastic block models: Fundamental
limits and efficient algorithms for recovery. Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), 2015
IEEE 56th Annual Symposium on, pp. 670-688 (2015).
[4] L. A. Adamic and N. Glance, The political blogosphere and the 2004 us election: divided they
blog. Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on Link discovery, pp. 36-43 (2005).
[5] J. M. Aldous and R. J. Wilson, Graphs and Applications: An Introductory Approach, Springer
Science & Business Media (2000).
[6] A. Beck and M. Teboulle, A fast iterative shrinkage-thresholding algorithm for linear inverse
problems, SIAM J. Image Sciences, Vol. 2, pp. 183–202 (2009).
[7] T. Blumensath and M. E. Davies, Iterative hard thresholding for compressed sensing, Appl.
Comput. Harmon. Anal., Vol. 27, pp.265–274 (2009).
[8] E. J. Candès, M. B. Wakin, and S. Boyd, Enhancing sparsity by re-weighted `1 minimization,
Journal of Fourier Analysis and Applications, Vol. 14, pp. 877-905 (2008).
[9] E. J. Candés, J. K. Romberg, and T. Tao, Stable signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate
measurements, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 59 issue 8, pp. 12071223 (2006).
[10] E. J. Candés and T. Tao, Decoding by linear programming, IEEE Transactions on Information
Theory, Vol 51, pp. 4203–4215 (2005).
[11] F. R. K. Chung, L. Lu, and V. Vu. The spectra of random graphs with given expected degrees,
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 100 issue 11, pp. 6313-6318 (2003).
[12] F. R. K. Chung, Spectral graph theory, No. 92, American Mathematical Soc. (1997).
[13] M. S. Cline, M. Smoot, E. Cerami, A. Kuchinsky, N. Landys, C. Workman, R. Christmas, I.
Avila-Campilo, M. Creech, B. Gross et al., Integration of biological networks and gene expression
data using cytoscape, Nature protocols, Vol. 2 issue 10, pp. 2366-2382 (2007).
[14] W. Dai and O. Milenkovic, Subspace pursuit for compressive sensing signal reconstruction, IEEE
Transactions on Information Theory, Vol. 55 issue 5, pp. 2230-2249 (2009).
[15] I. S. Dhillon, Co-clustering documents and words using spectral graph partitioning, Proceedings of the seventh ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data
Mining, pp. 269-274 (2001).
[16] W. Dong, X. Tang, Y. Yu, R. Nilsen, R. Kim, J. Griffith, J. Arnold and H-B. Schüttler, Systems
biology of the clock in Neurospora crassa, PloS one, 3.8, e3105 (2008).
37
[17] D. L. Donoho and M. Elad, Optimally sparse representation in general (nonorthogonal) dictionaries via `1 minimization, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 100 issue 5,
pp. 2197-2202 (2003).
[18] P. Erdõs and A. Rènyi, On Random Graphs 1, Publicationes Mathematicae Debrecen, Vol. 6,
pp. 290-297 (1959).
[19] M. Fiedler, A property of eigenvectors of nonnegative symmetric matrices and its application
to graph theory, Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal Vol 25.4, pp. 619-633 (1975).
[20] S. Fortunato, Community detection in graphs, Physics reports, Vol. 486 issues 3-5 , pp. 75-174
(2010).
[21] S. Foucart and H. Rauhut, A Mathematical Introduction to Compressive Sensing, Birkäus Verlag
(2013).
[22] S. Foucart, Hard thresholding pursuit: an algorithm for compressive sensing, SIAM Journal on
Numerical Analysis, Vol. 49 issue 6, pp. 2543-2563 (2011).
[23] S. Foucart and M-J. Lai, Sparsest solutions of underdetermined linear Systems via `q minimization for 0 ≤ q ≤ 1, Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis, Vol. 26 issue
3, pp. 395-407 (2009).
[24] B. J. Frey and D. Dueck, Clustering by passing messages between data points, Science Vol. 315
no. 5814, pp. 972-976 (2007).
[25] A. Frieze and M. Karoński, Introduction to Random Graphs, Cambridge University Press (2015).
[26] L. Hagen and A. B. Kahng, New spectral methods for ratio cut partitioning and clustering,
IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, Vol. 11 issue
9, pp.1074-1085 (1992).
[27] B. Hajek, Y. Wu, and J. Xu, Achieving exact cluster recovery threshold via semidefinite programming, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory Vol. 62.5, pp. 2788-2797 (2016).
[28] M. A. Herman and T. Strohmer, General deviants: An analysis of perturbations in compressed
sensing, IEEE Journal on Selected Topics in Signal Processing, Vol. 4 issue 2, pp. 342-349 (2010).
[29] P. W. Holland, K. B. Laskey, and S. Leinhardt, Stochastic block models: First steps, Social
Networks, Vol. 5 issue 2, pp.109-137 (1983).
[30] A. K. Jain, Data clustering: 50 years beyond K-means, Pattern Recognition Letters, Vol. 31
issue 8, pp. 651-666 (2010).
[31] L. Kaufman and P. J. Rousseeuw, Fitting Groups in Data. An Introduction to Cluster Analysis,
Wiley, New York (1990).
[32] F. Krzakala, C. Moore, E. Mossel, J. Neeman, A. Sly, L. Zdeborovà and P. Zhang, Spectral
Redemption in clustering sparse networks Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
Vol. 110 no. 52, pp. 20935-20940 (2013).
[33] C. M. Le, E. Levina, and R. Vershynin, Sparse random graphs: regularization and concentration
of the Laplacian, arXiv preprint arXiv:1502.03049 (2015).
38
[34] H. Li, Improved analysis of SP and CoSaMP under total perturbations, EURASIP Journal on
Advances in Signal Processing 2016, no. 1, pp. 112 (2016).
[35] U. Von Luxburg, A tutorial on spectral clustering, Statistics and Computing, Vol. 17 issue 4,
pp. 395-416 (2007).
[36] A. Montanari and S. Sen, Semidefinite programs on sparse random graphs, arXiv preprint
arXiv:1504.05910 (2015).
[37] M. C. V. Nascimento and A. De Carvalho, Spectral methods for graph clustering - A survey,
European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 211 issue 2, pp. 221-231 (2011).
[38] D. Needell and J. A. Tropp, CoSaMP: Iterative signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate
samples, Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis, Vol. 26 issue 3, pp. 301-321 (2009).
[39] M. E. J. Newman, Modularity and community structure in networks, Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences, Vol. 103 no. 23, pp 8577-8582 (2006).
[40] M. E. J. Newman, D. J. Watts, and S. H. Strogatz, Random graph models of social networks,
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 99 suppl. 1, pp. 2566-2572 (2002).
[41] A. Y. Ng, M. I. Jordan, and Y. Weiss, On spectral clustering: analysis and an algorithm,
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 849-856 (2002).
[42] S. C. Olhede and P. J. Wolfe, Network histograms and universality of block model approximation,
arXiv preprint arXiv:312-5306v3 (2014).
[43] J. Shi and J. Malik, Normalized cuts and image segmentation, IEEE Transactions on Pattern
Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 22 issue 8, pp. 888-905 (2000).
[44] R. C. Thompson, Principal submatrices IX: Interlacing inequalities for singular values of submatrices, Linear Algebra and Its Applications, Vol. 5 issue 1, pp. 1-12 (1972).
[45] N. Tremblay, G. Puy, R. Gribonval and P. Vandergheynst, Compressive spectral clustering,
Machine Learning, Proceedings of the Thirty-third International Conference (ICML 2016), pp.
20-22 (2016).
[46] J. A. Tropp, Greed is good: Algorithmic results for sparse approximation, IEEE Transactions
on Information Theory, Vol. 50 issue 10, pp. 2231-2242 (2004).
[47] W. W. Zachary, An Information flow model for conflict and fission in small groups, Journal of
Anthropological Research, Vol. 33 issue 4, pp. 452-473 (1977).
39
| 7cs.IT
|
arXiv:1701.04028v1 [cs.IT] 15 Jan 2017
Using data-compressors for statistical analysis
of problems on homogeneity testing and
classification
Boris Ryabko
Andrey Guskov
Institute of Computational Technologies of SB RAS
Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
The State Public Scientific Technological
Library of SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
Irina Selivanova
The State Public Scientific Technological
Library of SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
Abstract—Nowadays data compressors are applied to
many problems of text analysis, but many such applications
are developed outside of the framework of mathematical
statistics. In this paper we overcome this obstacle and show
how several methods of classical mathematical statistics can
be developed based on applications of the data compressors.
keywords: data compression, hypothesis testing, homogeneity test, classification, universal code.
I. I NTRODUCTION
Data compression methods (or universal codes) were
discovered in the 1960’s and nowadays they are widely
used to compress texts for their storage or transmission.
In the last thirty years, it was recognized that data
compressors can be used for many purposes which are
far from file compaction. In particular, it was shown that
methods of data compression can be used for prediction
and hypothesis testing for time series in the framework of
classical mathematical statistics, see [15] and a review
there. Later, several authors applied data compressors
to problems which are close, in spirit, to homogeneity testing, estimation of correlation and covariance,
classifications, clustering and some others; see [3], [4],
[10], [11], [18]. The main idea of their approach can
be understood from the following example. Suppose
that there are three sequences of letters x1 x2 ...xn , y1
y2 ... yk , z1 z2 ...zm and a certain data-compressor ϕ.
The sequences x1 x2 ...xn , y1 y2 ... yk obey different
probability distributions, whereas z1 z2 ...zm obeys one of
them. The goal is to determine this distribution. (It is the
well-known “three samples problem”.) If x1 x2 ...xn and
z1 z2 ...zm obey the same probability distribution, then,
the sequence z1 z2 ...zm will be compressed better after
x1 x2 ...xn than after y1 ... yk . More precisely, if one
compresses sequences x1 x2 ...xn , y1 y2 ... yk and combined ones x1 x2 ...xn z1 z2 ...zm and y1 y2 ... yk z1 z2 ...zm ,
the difference |ϕ(x1 x2 ...xn z1 z2 ...zm )| − |ϕ(x1 x2 ...xn )|
will be less than |ϕ(y1 y2 ...yk z1 z2 ...zm )|−|ϕ(y1 y2 ...yk )|
(Here |U | is the length U .) For instance, let x1 x2 ...xn ,
z1 z2 ...zm be texts in English, whereas y1 y2 ... yk is
in German. Then the English text z1 z2 ...zm will be
compressed better after the text in the same language
(x1 x2 ...xn ) than after the text in German (y1 y2 ...yk ),
i.e. the first difference will be less than the second one.
This natural approach was used for diagnostic of the
authorship of literary and musical texts, for estimation
of closeness of DNA sequences, construction of phylogenetic trees and many other problems ( [3], [4],
[6], [10], [11], [18], [19]). Many papers (see [11] and
review there) were devoted to the measurement of the
interdependence between sequences (or the association,
similarity, closeness, etc.), because such measures plays
an important rule in clustering, classification and some
other methods of text analysis. It is important to note,
that their approaches are outside of the framework of
mathematical statistics and, in particular, do not give a
possibility to reason about consistency of estimates, tests,
classifiers, clustering, etc.
It is important that the modern data compressors
are based on so-called universal codes and the main
properties of universal codes are valid for them (as far
as asymptotic properties can be valid for a real computer
program). A formal definition of universal codes is
given in Appendix 1, but here we informally note that
universal codes can compress sequences generated by a
source with unknown statistics till its Shannon entropy,
which, in turn, is a lower limit on lossless compression.
Note that nowadays there are many classes of universal
III. T HE MAIN THEOREMS
codes which are based on different ideas and showed
their practical efficiency. Out of the most popular we
mention the PPM algorithm, which is used along with
the arithmetic code ( [1], [14]), Lempel-Ziv codes ( [20],
[21]), Borrows-Willer transformation ( [2], [12]) which
is used along with the “book stack” (or MTF) code (
[16], [17]) and some others (see for review ( [13], [15]).
In this paper we show how the idea of compression
of combined texts described above can be used for
solving problems of homogeneity testing, classification,
and estimation of a measure of interdependence, or the
association. A distinction of the suggested method from
other approaches is that it belongs to the framework of
mathematical statistics.
First we present a theorem which can be considered
as a theoretical basis for application of data compressors
for solving the problems described above. First, for two
words v1 ..vl and u1 ..us we define the following value:
|ϕ(v1 ..vl /u1 ..us )| = |ϕ(u1 ..us v1 ..vl )| − |ϕ(u1 ..us )|,
(1)
where s, l are integers. Informally, it is the length of the
codeword for v1 ..vl if it is encoded with the word u1 ..us .
Theorem 1. Let µx and µy be stationary ergodic sources
generating letters from a finite alphabet A and let their
memory be upper-bounded by a certain constant M .
Suppose that ...y−t y−t+1 ... y−1 y0 is generated by µy ,
whereas ...x−t x−t+1 ...x−1 x0 and w1 ...wm , m ≥ 1, are
generated by µx in such a way that all three sequences
are independent, and let ϕ be a universal code. Define
II. D EFINITIONS AND PROBLEM FORMULATIONS
First we briefly consider the main properties of socalled universal codes, paying the main attention to their
meaning whereas formal definitions of codes, stationary
ergodic sources and Shannon entropy are given in Appendix 1 and can be found in [5], [15].
Here we only note that we consider so-called lossless
codes ϕ which encode words over alphabet A using
words from the binary alphabet {0, 1} in such a way that
any word can be decoded without mistakes, i.e. there
exists a map ϕ−1 such that for any word w over A
ϕ−1 (ϕ(w)) = w. Let a code ϕ be applied to encode
sequences generated by a stationary ergodic source µ.
The value Rt (ϕ, µ) = 1t |ϕ(x1 ...xt )| − h∞ (µ) is called
the redundancy, where h∞ (µ) is the limit entropy, see
Appendix 1. (It is known that h∞ (µ) is an attainable
lower limit for lossless codes, that is why the difference
is called the redundancy.) By definition, the code ϕ is
called universal if the redundancy goes to 0 as t grows,
i.e. limt→∞ Rt (ϕ, µ) = 0 . (In other words, a universal
code compresses sequences generated by any stationary
ergodic source till the limit value.)
The main goal of the paper is to give a compressionbased solution for the following problems:
i) Homogeneity test, where there are several sequences
1
s
, ... y1s y2s ...ym
,
x11 x12 ...x1n1 , ..., xk1 xk2 ...xknk , y11 y21 ...ym
1
s
generated either by a single source or by two different
ones, and two corresponding hypotheses. We also consider the more general case where there are more than
two different sets of sequences.
ii) Classification problems, where there are samples
1
s
, ... y1s y2s ...ym
x11 x12 ...x1n1 , ..., xk1 xk2 ...xknk , y11 y21 ...ym
1
s
generated two different (but unknown) sources and
z1 ...zl is generated by one of the two. The goal is to
determine which of them generated z1 ...zl .
iii) Estimation of a so-called measurement of interdependence, or the association.
∆t,k,m = |ϕ(w1 ...wm /y−k y−k+1 ...y−1 y0 )|−
|ϕ(w1 ...wm /x−t x−t+1 ...x−1 x0 )|
(2)
where |ϕ(v1 ..vl /u1 ..us )| is defined in (1). Then there
exists such a constant λ and an integer m0 that for any
m > m0 there is such an integer L that, for any t >
m + L, k > m + L,
Eµx Eµy (∆t,k,m ) ≥ λ m + ◦(m) ,
(3)
and, if µx = µy then λ = 0, otherwise λ > 0. Here
Eν () is the expectation with respect to the measure ν.
The proof is given in Appendix 2, whereas here
we give some explanations of the theorem. The
theorem compares two cases: the word w1 ...wm is
compressed either together with x−t x−t+1 ...x−1 x0
or with y−k y−k+1 ...y−1 y0 . The word w1 ...wm is
generated by µx , hence, it should be compressed
better with x−t x−t+1 ...x−1 x0 and the value
|ϕ(w1 ...wt /x−t x−t+1 ...x−1 x0 )|(=
|ϕ(x−t x−t+1
... x−1 x0 w1 ...wt )|− |ϕ(x−t x−t+1 ...x−1 x0 )|) should be
less than |ϕ(w1 ...wt /y−k y−k+1 ...y−1 y0 )|. The theorem
shows, that, indeed, the word w1 ...wm is compressed
better together with x−t x−t+1 ...x−1 x0 if the lengths
of sequences w1 w2 ...wm , x−t x−t+1 ...x−1 x0 and
y−k y−k+1 ...y−1 y0 are sufficiently large.
Let there be two sets of sequences: X = { x11 x12 ...x1n1 ,
1
2 2
,
x1 x2 ...x2n2 , ..., xk1 xk2 ...xknk }, and Y = { y11 y21 ..., ym
1
2
s s
s
2 2
y1 y2 ...ym2 , ... y1 y2 ...yms }, generated by possibly different measures µx and µy . We consider two hypotheses
H0 = {µx = µy } and H1 = {µx 6= µy } and our goal
is to develop a statistical test for them using the sets
X and Y . First we give an informal description of the
suggested test, which will be based on data compression.
2
y, y ∗ ∈ Y the ratios |x|/|x∗ | and |y|/|y ∗ | are upperbounded by a certain constant, then, with probability 1,
the Type II error goes to 0.
Combine a half of the sequences from the set X into X ∗
bk/2c bk/2c
bk/2c
x2
...xnbk/2c
(say, x11 x12 ...x1n1 , x21 x22 ...x2n1 , ... , x1
2
1
, ...,
, y11 y22 ...ym
) and half of Y (say and y11 y21 ...ym
2
1
bs/2c bs/2c
bs/2c
∗
y1
y2
...ymbs/2c )) into Y . Then compress all other
sequences using a universal code ϕ along with X ∗ and
Y ∗ . If H0 is true, the values |ϕ(xi1 xi2 ...xini / X ∗ )| ,
j
i = bk/2c + 1, ..., k and |ϕ(y1j y2j ...ym
/ X ∗ )| , j =
j
bs/2c+1, ..., s should be evenly mixed. Otherwise, if H1
is true, then, on average, the numbers from the second
set should be larger than those from the first one, because the probability distributions of the sequences from
i
yji yji ...ym
and X ∗ are different, whereas the probability
j
distributions of the sequences xi1 xi2 ...xini and X ∗ are the
same (here and below |U | is the number of elements in
U ).
The test. A more formal description of the suggested
test is as follows: i) Denote the set X \ X ∗ by X̂ and
Y \ Y ∗ by Ŷ and calculate for any xi1 xi2 ...xini from X̂
the values
γi =
|ϕ(xi1 xi2 ...xini /Y ∗ )|
−
|ϕ(xi1 xi2 ...xini /X ∗ )|
The proof is given in Appendix 2, but here we give
some comments. First, note that there are many tests
of homogeneity for 2 × 2 tables and, in principle, any
of them can be used. That is why, we do not describe
the test Ψα on sizes of n1,1 , n1,2 , n2,1 , n2,2 . Second,
the described method can be easily extended from the
two-sample problem to the s-sample problem, s > 2.
Namely, let there be s, s > 2, sets V1 , V2 , ..., Vs of
sequences generated by stationary ergodic sources µ1 , µ2
..., µs . Let there be the hypotheses H0 = {µ1 = µ2
= ... = µs } and H1 = H̄0 . In this case we carry
out calculations based on the scheme described above
in order to obtain a so-called s × s table and then apply
a test for homogeneity, see ( [7]).
Measurement of the interdependence and association.
If the hypothesis of homogeneity is rejected, it is
natural to measure interdependence. We suggest to
measure interdependence between two sets of sequences
X and Y (and the corresponding sources) based on
the above described 2 × 2 tables. (In the case of
the s-sample problem, s > 2, the measures will be
based on the s × s table.) This problem is wellinvestigated in the mathematical statistics, see, for
example, ( [7], part 33). That is why, we mention such
measures only briefly. For 2 × 2 tables we mention the
coefficient of association, Q, defined by the equation
Q = (n1,1 n2,2 − n1,2 n2,1 )/n1,1 n2,2 + n1,2 n2,1 )
and
p the coefficient V = (n1,1 n2,2 − n1,2 n2,1 )/
(n1,1 + n2,2 )(n1,1 + n2,1 )(n1,2 + n2,2 )(n2,1 + n2,2 ),
see, ( [7], part 33). It is important to note that there are
well-known methods of building standard errors and
confidence interval for Q and V ( [7], part 33).
(4)
j
and for any y1j y2j ...ym
from Ŷ
j
j
j
δj = |ϕ(y1j y2j ...ym
/X ∗ )| − |ϕ(y1j y2j ...ym
/Y ∗ )| . (5)
j
j
Define
n1,1 = |{i : γi ≥ 0}|, n1,2 = |{i : γi < 0}|,
n2,1 = |{i : δi < 0}|, n2,2 = |{i : δi ≥ 0}| .
(6)
ii) Apply the test of the independence for the 2 × 2
table to
N2,2 =
n1,1
n2,1
n1,2
n2,2
.
A detailed analysis of this problem is carried out in [7],
part 33. In particular, there is a description of efficient
tests for homogeneity problem for the 2×2 table (see part
33.22). We denote this test as Ψα , where α is the level
of significance. Note, that there are some requirements
for values of n1,1 , n1,2 , n2,1 , n2,2 which should be valid
if Ψα is used (see [7]).
1
, ŵ2 =
Let there be sequences ŵ1 = w11 w21 ...wm
1
k
k
k k
..., ŵ = w1 w2 ...wmk , generated by
stationary ergodic sources ν1 , ..., νk , correspondingly,
where k ≥ 2. There is a new sequence û = u1 u2 ...un ,
n ≥ 2, and it is known beforehand that it is generated
by one of the sources from {ν1 , ..., νk }. The problem
of classification is to determine which source generated
the sequence û = u1 u2 ...un . By definition, a method of
classification is called asymptotically consistent if, with
probability 1, the method finds ν which generated the
sequence u1 u2 ...un when min(n, m1 , m2 , ..., mk ) goes
to infinity.
2
w12 w22 ...wm
,
2
Theorem 2. Let µx and µy be stationary ergodic measures whose memory is finite (but, possibly, unknown). If
the above described test is applied for testing H0 against
H1 along with the test Ψα and the requirements of Ψα
for values of n1,1 , n1,2 , n2,1 , n2,2 are valid, then for any
code ϕ the Type I error is not grater than α.
If ϕ is a universal code, |X| and |Y | go to infinity
and the lengths of all sequences from X and Y go to
infinity in such a way that for all sequences x, x∗ ∈ X,
Method of classification. We suggest the following method of classification: decide that the sequence
3
where P (b) and Q(b) are probability distributions over
alphabet B. It is known that for any distributions P and
Q the KL divergence is nonnegative and equals 0 if and
only if P (a) = Q(a) for all a .
Let us describe universal codes, or data compressors.
(A detailed description can be found, for example, in
[15].) First we note that (as is known in Information
Theory) sequences generated by a source p can be
”compressed” on average till the limit Shannon entropy
h∞ (p) and, on the other hand, there is no code ψ for
which the expected codeword length is less than h∞ (p);
see [5]. As defined above, a code ϕ is universal if it
compresses till this limit. We will consider universal
codes which can be applied to any word x1 ...xs , n > 0,
from a certain alphabet A and such that the following
natural property is valid: for any words u, v, |v| > 0,
u1 u2 ...un was generated the source νj for which
i
j = arg min |ϕ(u1 u2 ...un /w1i w2i ...wm
)| .
k
i=1,...,k
(7)
Theorem 3. Let ν1 , ..., νk be stationary ergodic measures whose memories are finite (but, possibly, unknown).
If ϕ is a universal code and the lengths of all sequences
û, ŵ1 , ŵ2 , ..., ŵk go to infinity in such a way that
lim |û|/ min |ŵj | = 0 ,
|û|→∞
j
(8)
then the described method is asymptotically consistent.
IV. A PPENDIX 1
Let τ be a stationary ergodic source generating letters
from a finite alphabet A. (Definitions can be found in
[5].) The m− order (conditional) Shannon entropy and
the limit Shannon entropy are defined as follows:
X
X
τ (v)
hm (τ ) = −
τ (a| v) log τ (a| v),
v∈Am
|ϕ(uv)| − |ϕ(u)| > 0 .
a∈A
h∞ (τ ) = lim hm (τ ).
m→∞
For any universal code ϕ we define a measure πϕ as
follows:
(9)
It is known that for any integer m
hm (τ ) ≥ hm+1 (τ ) ≥ h∞ (τ ),
(13)
πϕ (x1 x2 ...xt ) = 2−|ϕ(x1 x2 ...xt )| ,
(10)
(14)
where x1 x2 ...xt is a word over A. It is known that for
any t
X
πϕ (u) = 1 ,
(15)
see [5]. Now we define codes. Let A∞ be the set of
all infinite words x1 x2 . . . over the alphabet A. A data
compression method (or code) ϕ is defined as a set
of mappings ϕn such that ϕn : An → {0, 1}∗ , n =
1, 2, . . . and for each pair of different words x, y ∈ An
ϕn (x) 6= ϕn (y). Informally, it means that the code ϕ
can be applied for compression of each message of any
length n over the alphabet A and the message can be
decoded if its code is known. It is also required that each
sequence ϕn (u1 )ϕn (u2 )...ϕn (ur ), r ≥ 1, of encoded
words from the set An , n ≥ 1, can be uniquely decoded
into u1 u2 ...ur . Such codes are called uniquely decodable. For example, let A = {a, b}, the code ψ1 (a) =
0, ψ1 (b) = 00, obviously, is not uniquely decodable. It
is well known that if a code ϕ is uniquely decodable
then the lengths of the codewords satisfy the following
inequality (Kraft inequality): Σu∈An 2−|ϕ(u)| ≤ 1 ,
see, for ex., [5]. Moreover, if the sum Σu∈An 2−|ϕ(u)|
is less than 1, there exists such a code ϕ∗ that i)
∗
Σu∈An 2−|ϕ (u)| = 1 , and |ϕ∗ (u)| ≤ |ϕ(u)| for any
word u, [5]. (Informally, it means, that ϕ∗ compresses
better.) So, we can consider only codes for which
Note that this equation shows that the code ϕ estimates
the (unknown) probability precisely, where T grows.
Σu∈An 2−|ϕ(u)| = 1 .
V. A PPENDIX 2: PROOFS
u∈At
(see the Kraft inequality and (11)).
Now we consider an application of universal codes (or
data compressors) which is the main tool for solving the
problems mentioned in Introduction. From (1) and (14)
we immediately obtain that
|ϕ(v1 ..vl /u1 ..us )| = − log(πϕ (v1 ..vl |u1 ..us ))
(16)
and the right part is defined correctly, see (13). The
following property of universal codes will play an important role in what follows. Let µz be a stationary
ergodic source generating letters from an alphabet A
and ϕ be a universal code. For any integer m ≥ 1 and
w1 ...wm ∈ Am with probability 1
lim log
T →∞
(11)
We will use a so-called Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence, which is defined by
X
P (b)
,
(12)
D(P ||Q) =
P (b) log
Q(b)
πϕ (w1 w2 ...wm |z−T ...z0 )
= 0.
µz (w1 w2 ...wm |z−T ...z0 )
(17)
Proof of Theorem 1. First we prove the following
Claim.
X
Eµx Eµy
µx (w1 w2 ...wm )
w1 w2 ...wm
b∈B
4
µx (w1 ...wm |x−t x−t+1 ...x0 )
= (m − M )λ + O(1) ,
µy (w1 ...wm |y−k y−k+1 ...y0 )
(18)
where M is a upper bound of memories of µx and µy ,
and λ is such a constant that λ = 0 if µx = µy and
λ > 0 otherwise.
Proof of the claim. The left side can be presented as
follows:
X
Eµx Eµy
µx (w1 w2 ...wm )
X
+... +
log
w1 ...wM
µx ((wM +1 |w1 ...wM )
µy ((wM +1 |w1 w2 ...wM )
X
+Eµx Eµy (
µx (w1 w2 ...wM −1 )
w1 w2 ...wM −1
X
µx (w1 ...wm |x−t x−t+1 ...x0 )
=
µy (w1 ...wm |y−k y−k+1 ...y0 )
X
Eµx Eµy (
µx (w1 w2 ...wm−1 )
µx ((wM |x0 w1 w2 ...wM −1 )
+ ...
µy ((wM |y0 w1 w2 ...wM −1 )
log
+
X
µx (w1 ) log
w1
w1 w2 ...wm−1
µx (w1 |x−M +1 x−M +2 ...x0 )
) . (20)
µy (w1 |y−M +1 y−M +2 ...y0 )
For any function ψ(ue+1 , ..., ue+b ) and any measure
ν(u1 u2 ...ue ue+1 ...ue+b )
X
ν(u1 u2 ...ue ue+1 ...ue+b )
µx (wm |w1 w2 ...wm−1 )
wm
µx (wm |x−t x−t+1 ...x0 w1 w2 ...wm−1 )
µy (wm |y−k y−k+1 ...y0 w1 w2 ...wm−1 )
X
+
µx (w1 w2 ...wm−2 )
u1 u2 ...ue ue+1 ...ue+b
ψ(ue+1 , ..., ue+b )
=
w1 w2 ...wm−2
X
µx (wM |x0 w1 w2 ...wM −1 )
wM
log
log
µx (wM +1 |w1 ...wM )
wM +1
log
w1 w2 ...wm
X
X
µx (w1 ...wM )
X
ν(ue+1 ...ue+b )ψ(ue+1 , ..., ue+b ) ,
ue+1 ...ue+b
µx (wm−1 |w1 w2 ...wm−2 )
where e and b are integers. Having taken into account
this equation, stationarity µx and µy , equations (V), (V)
and (V), we obtain
X
Eµx Eµy
µx (w1 w2 ...wm )
wm−1
µx (wm−1 |x−t x−t+1 ...x0 w1 w2 ...wm−2 )
µy (wm−1 |y−k y−k+1 ...y0 w1 w2 ...wm−2 )
X
µx (w1 |x−t x−t+1 ...x0 )
+... +
µx (w1 ) log
) . (19)
µ
y (w1 |y−k y−k+1 ...y0 )
w
log
w1 w2 ...wm
µx (w1 ...wm |x−t x−t+1 ...x0 )
=
µy (w1 ...wm |y−k y−k+1 ...y0 )
X
(m − M )
µx (w1 w2 ...wM )
1
log
It is supposed that the memory of µx and µy is
upper-bounded by M . Hence, by definition, it means
that µr (v|ui ui+1 ...uj ) = µr (v|uj−M +1 uj−M +2 ...uj ),
where j ≥ i+M −1. From this equation and the previous
one we obtain the following equation:
X
Eµx Eµy
µx (w1 w2 ...wm )
w1 w2 ...wm−2
X
µx (wM +1 |w1 w2 ...wM )
wM +1
w1 w2 ...wm
log
µx ((wM +1 |w1 w2 ...wM )
+ O(1) .
µy ((wM +1 |w1 w2 ...wM )
µx (w1 ...wm |x−t x−t+1 ...x0 )
=
µy (w1 ...wm |y−k y−k+1 ...y0 )
From properties of K-L divergence (see (12) ) we can
X
X
see that λ > 0 if µx 6= µy and, obviously, λ = 0, if
µx (w1 w2 ...wm−1 )
µx (wm |w1 w2 ...wm−1 )
µx = µy . The claim is proven.
w1 w2 ...wm−1
wm
Let us proceed with proof of the theorem. Having
µx (wm |wm−M ...wm−1 )
taken into account the definitions (16) and (1), we obtain
log
that
µy (wm |wm−M ...wm−1 )
X
X
Eµx Eµy (∆t,k,m ) =
+
µx (w1 ...wm−2 )
µx (wm−1 |w1 ...wm−2 )
X
X
X
log
w1 ...wm−2
wm−1
u−t u−t+1 ...u0 ∈At+1 v−k v−k+1 ...v0 ∈Ak+1 w1 w2 ...um ∈Am
µx (wm−M −1 ...wm−2 )
log
µy (wm−M −1 ...wm−2 )
µy (v−k v−k+1 ...v0 )µx (u−t u−t+1 ...u0 )µx (w1 w2 ...um )
5
log
πϕ (w1 ...wm |u−t u−t+1 ...u0 )
.
πϕ (w1 ...wm |v−k v−k+1 ...v0 )
[5] Cover, T. M., Thomas, J. A., 2006. Elements of information
theory. Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY, USA.
[6] Ferragina, P., Giancarlo, R., Greco, V., Manzini, G., Valiente, G.,
2007. Compression-based classification of biological sequences
and structures via the universal similarity metric: experimental
assessment. BMC bioinformatics 8 (1), 1.
[7] Kendall, M., Stuart, A., 1961. The advanced theory of statistics;
Vol.2: Inference and relationship. London.
[8] Khmelev, D. V., Teahan, W. J., 2003. A repetition based measure
for verification of text collections and for text categorization.
In: Proceedings of the 26th annual international ACM SIGIR
conference on Research and development in informaion retrieval.
ACM, pp. 104–110.
[9] Kieffer, J. C., Yang, E.-H., 2000. Grammar-based codes: a new
class of universal lossless source codes. IEEE Transactions on
Information Theory 46 (3), 737–754.
[10] Kukushkina, O. V., Polikarpov, A., Khmelev, D. V., 2001. Using literal and grammatical statistics for authorship attribution.
Problems of Information Transmission 37 (2), 172–184.
[11] Li, M., Chen, X., Li, X., Ma, B., Vitányi, P. M., 2004. The similarity metric. IEEE transactions on Information Theory 50 (12),
3250–3264.
[12] Manzini, G., 2001. An analysis of the burrowswheeler transform.
Journal of the ACM (JACM) 48 (3), 407–430.
[13] Rissanen, J., Jul. 1984. Universal coding, information, prediction,
and estimation. Information Theory, IEEE Transactions on 30 (4),
629 – 636.
[14] Rissanen, J., Langdon, G. G., 1979. Arithmetic coding. IBM
Journal of research and development 23 (2), 149–162.
[15] Ryabko, B., Astola, J., Malyutov, M., 2016. Compression-Based
Methods of Statistical Analysis and Prediction of Time Series.
Springer.
[16] Ryabko, B. Y., 1980. Data compression by means of a book stack.
Problemy Peredachi Informatsii 16 (4), 16–21.
[17] Ryabko, B., Horspool, N. R., Cormack, G. V., Sekar, S., Ahuja,
S. B., 1987. Technical correspondence. Communications of the
ACM 30 (9), 792–797.
[18] Teahan, W. J., Harper, D. J., 2003. Using compression-based
language models for text categorization. In: Language modeling
for information retrieval. Springer, pp. 141–165.
[19] Vitányi, P. M., 2011. Information distance in multiples. IEEE
Transactions on Information Theory 57 (4), 2451–2456.
[20] Ziv, J., Lempel, A., 1977. A universal algorithm for sequential
data compression. IEEE Transactions on information theory
23 (3), 337–343.
[21] Ziv, J., Lempel, A., 1978. Compression of individual sequences
via variable-rate coding. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 24, 530–536.
(21)
The following equation is obvious:
log
πϕ (w1 ...wm |u−t u−t+1 ...u0 )
=
πϕ (w1 ...wm |v−k v−k+1 ...v0 )
log
µx (w1 ...wm |u−t u−t+1 ...u0 )
+
µy (w1 ...wm |v−k v−k+1 ...v0 )
log
πϕ (w1 ...wm |u−t u−t+1 ...u0 )
+
µx (w1 ...wm |u−t u−t+1 ...u0 )
log
µy (w1 ...wm |v−k v−k+1 ...v0 )
.
πϕ (w1 ...wm |v−k v−k+1 ...v0 )
(22)
The first term is estimated in the claim, see (V), whereas
the second and the third terms can be estimated based on
(17). So, from the claim and (17), we can see that, with
probability 1, Eµx Eµy (∆t,k,m ) = (m − M )λ + O(1) .
The theorem is proven.
Proof of the Theorem 2. First we consider the case
where H0 is true. It means that the sequences from X̂
and Ŷ obey the same distribution. Hence, γi (4) and
δj (5) have the same distribution, too, and the above
mentioned test Ψα from [7], part 33, can be applied.
Now we consider the case where H1 is true. In this
case the length of any sequence grows, so, the length
will be grater than m0 from Theorem 1. The number
of sequences grows to infinity and the total length of a
half of them goes to infinity in such a way that for any
integer L the total length will be grater than the sum
m + L from Theorem 1. From this theorem we can see
that n1,2 and n2,1 goes to 0 and, hence, the Type II error
goes to 0.
Proof of the Theorem 3. Suppose, that the sequence
u1 u2 ...un was generated by νj . Then, we can see
from Theorem 1 that, with probability 1, the value
i
|ϕ(u1 u2 ...un /w1i w2i ...wm
)| grows as λi n + ◦(n), λi >
k
i i
i
0, if i 6= j, (i.e. w1 w2 ...wm
) is generated by νi ). On
i
i
the other hand, |ϕ(u1 u2 ...un /w1i w2i ...wm
)| = ◦(n).
k
i
i
i
Hence, |ϕ(u1 u2 ...un / w1 w2 ... wmi )| is minimal when
i = j (i.o., u1 u2 ...un is generated by νj ). The theorem
is proven.
R EFERENCES
[1] Bell, T., Witten, I. H., Cleary, J. G., 1989. Modeling for text
compression. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 21 (4), 557–
591.
[2] Burrows, M., Wheeler, D. J., 1994. A block-sorting lossless data
compression algorithm.
[3] Cilibrasi, R., Vitanyi, P., 2005. Clustering by compression. IEEE
Transactions on Information Theory 51, 1523–1545.
[4] Cilibrasi, R., Vitányi, P., De Wolf, R., 2004. Algorithmic clustering of music based on string compression. Computer Music
Journal 28 (4), 49–67.
6
| 10math.ST
|
Optimization of stochastic lossy transport networks and
applications to power grids
arXiv:1712.07411v1 [math.OC] 20 Dec 2017
Alessandro Zocca∗ and Bert Zwart†
December 21, 2017
Abstract
Motivated by developments in renewable energy and smart grids, we formulate a stylized
mathematical model of a transport network with stochastic load fluctuations. Using an
affine control rule, we explore the trade-off between the number of controllable resources
in a lossy transport network and the performance gain they yield in terms of expected
transportation losses. Our results are explicit and reveal the interaction between the level
of flexibility, the intrinsic load uncertainty and the network structure.
Keywords: stochastic network; optimization; lossy transport; total effective resistance; efficiency;
robustness; power grids; renewable energy sources.
1
Introduction
A transport network is an abstract model describing a structure in which some commodity is
transferred from the “source” nodes of the network to the “sink” nodes according to a specified
routing that is determined by some external principle or design, see [10, 46]. Examples of transport
networks are road networks, railways, pipes, and power grids.
In this work we focus in particular on lossy transport networks where a fraction of the
transported good is inevitably lost, having in mind as primary application power systems in
which part of the transported electricity is lost due to heat dissipation in the line conductors.
The main question that we want to address in the present paper is whether these transportation
losses can be reduced in the scenario in which we have no direct control on the routing, but some
of the nodes of the network have controllable loads. This is the case for power systems in which
the line flows are determined by physical laws, but at the same time feature an increasing number
of controllable energy resources, like energy storage devices, smart buildings and appliances, and
electric vehicles.
In the present work we consider a probabilistic model to describe the stochastic fluctuations of
the load in (a subset of) the nodes of the network. This is instrumental to model the stochastic load
fluctuations due to power demand uncertainty and intermittent generation by renewable energy
∗
Department of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA
91125, Email: [email protected]
†
Centrum Wiskunde and Informatica (CWI), 1098 XG Amsterdam, The Netherlands
1
sources. The current power grids were originally built around conventional power generation
systems and therefore they are not equipped to cope with this massive amount of uncertainty,
especially in power supply. Managing this uncertainty on such a large scale with existing methods
will soon become crucial: in the next decades power grids will have to become more flexible and
robust to reduce the likelihood of contingencies and blackouts, whose social and economic impact
is enormous.
As mentioned earlier, next to the increasing renewable penetration, there is another powerful
trend that is driving this pervasive evolution of power system: the advent of distributed energy
resources. At a high level, all these resources can be seen as “virtual storage/batteries”, in the
sense that over short time-scales they can dynamically reduce their power consumptions and even
inject electricity in the power grid when necessary, see [32, 43]. Even if at the present stage these
resources are not fully incorporated, they have a huge potential: if their penetration increases
and we can actively and optimally control them, then they can make power grids more flexible
and at the same time effectively mitigate the volatile nature of renewable power generation and
allow a higher share of renewable energy sources.
The controllable loads that we consider in this work should be seen as an abstraction of more
concrete examples, such as (i) actual energy storage that is neither full nor empty, (ii) distribution
grids with ample flexible and/or deferrable load [32, 33, 36, 37] or (iii) conventional generators
that can provide balancing services.
The stochastic network model considered in this paper aims to understand the potential that
these controllable resources can have in mitigating the load uncertainty and in particular the
transportation losses due to the stochastic load fluctuations in the network nodes. Specifically, we
consider a network with random sources and sinks modelled by an undirected connected weighted
graph G consisting of n nodes and m edges to which are associated non-negative weights w ∈ Rm
+,
and investigate how much could the average total loss be reduced by operating optimally the
subset B ⊆ V of nodes with controllable loads.
The metric we consider here to quantify the transportation losses due to stochastic fluctuations
is a quadratic function of the load profile that has been introduced in [21], where the authors
showed that is a good approximation for the true total power losses in AC power grids. It is a
scalar quantity that in our setting captures both the correlations in the load fluctuations as well
as the role of the controllable loads in that are available in the network.
Such a metric generalizes the notion of total effective resistance Rtot (G) of the graph G,
also known as Kirchhoff index. This is a key quantity that measures how well connected and
robust a network is and for this reason has been extensively studied and rediscovered in various
contexts, such as complex network analysis [13], theoretical chemistry (for an overview see [47]
and references therein), and probability theory [12].
We then formulate a constrained optimization problem to find the optimal load-sharing factors
for the controllable loads. We prove that the solution is unique and give a closed-form expression
for the optimal control in which appears an interplay between the network structure, the location
of the controllable nodes, and the correlation structure of the load fluctuations.
In particular, our result shows how the correlation structure between load fluctuations affects
the optimal operation of the network resources and this is extremely relevant in power grids with
geographically close wind or solar farms, whose power outputs will be highly correlated. These
insights are derived without making Gaussian assumptions on the distribution of the fluctuations.
We then use this explicit solution to explore the trade-off between the number of controllable
resources available in a network and the performance gain they yield, quantified as transportation
2
loss reduction. The analysis builds on and extends that of the conference paper [48], in which
the scenario with exactly two controllable loads has been considered. In particular, the authors
show therein that the expected total loss due to fluctuations can be reduced by 25% in a line
network by adding one controllable storage device. In the present paper we extended that insight
by showing that for large graphs the total expected loss can be on average reduced by a factor
(1 + 1/k)/2 when k controllable loads are available. This insight holds when each node in the
network is self-sustainable on average.
This suggests that, even if power grids are becoming locally more robust and self-supportive,
transportation losses can be reduced by up to 50 percent, and the number of controllable loads
or balancing services k quantify how close one can get to this reduction. Though our model is
stylized, it provides a simple quantitative estimate on the value of balancing services in a scenario
where each node in the network is self-sustainable on average.
We remark that our stylized model is “static”, in the sense the optimal control we derive does
rebalance the total power mismatch in the network in any scenario, but does not depend on the
realized load fluctuations. Indeed, it depends only on the network structure, on the location of
the controllable loads and on their average covariance structure of the load fluctuations. For this
reason our model is not specific for a precise time-scale and provides insights into the value of
balancing services both in real-time operations as well as long-term planning.
Our work complements a large body of literature on optimal topology design for power
grids [11, 17, 21] and on optimal control of multiple controllable devices and generators where
often the designed controls, often called participation factors are also affine in the stochastic
load fluctuations, see e.g., [1, 5, 6, 18, 19, 22, 30, 34, 39, 40, 41]. Optimal policies for storage
management, especially aiming at the mitigation of the uncertainties in wind generation, have been
explored in [2, 16, 15, 44], where, however, the physical network is not modelled explicitly. Optimal
storage placement can increase network reliability, as shown in [3] by simulation techniques.
Storage can also be used for arbitrage, exploiting temporal price differences [8, 9] and the impact
of storage on energy markets has been studied in [7, 14].
The rest of the paper is organized as follows. We provide a detailed model description in
Section 2. In Section 3 we investigate the optimal load sharing factors in several scenarios. These
results are applied in Section 4 where a scaling law is presented for large networks. In Section 5
we report several numerical experiments. Section 6 concludes.
2
Model description
In this paper we model a lossy transport network as a weighted graph (G, w), where the graph G
is a simple undirected graph G = (V, E) with |V | = n nodes and |E| = m edges and w ∈ Rm
+ is the
collection of edge weights. In the context of power grids, the nodes of G are often referred to as
buses, the edges as transmission lines and the quantity wi,j is the susceptance of the transmission
line connecting buses i and j. Missing edges can be thought as edges with zero weight.
The weighted Laplacian matrix of the graph G is the matrix L ∈ Rn×n defined as
(P
if i = j,
k6=i wi,k
Li,j :=
−wi,j
if i 6= j.
Denote by λ1 , λ2 , . . . , λn its eigenvalues and by v1 , v2 , . . . , vn the corresponding eigenvectors, which
we can take to be pairwise orthogonal. It is well-known that L is a real symmetric positive
3
semi-definite matrix, which means that it has a real non-negative spectrum, i.e., 0 ≤ λ1 ≤ . . . ≤ λn .
All the rows of L sum up to zero and thus the matrix L is singular. Under the assumption
that G is a connected graph, the eigenvalue λ1 = 0 has multiplicity one and the corresponding
eigenvector v1 is the vector with all unit entries, which we denote by 1 ∈ Rn .
Let L+ ∈ Rn×n be the Moore-Penrose pseudoinverse of the weighted Laplacian matrix L.
Using the eigenspace structure of L, the pseudoinverse L+ can be defined as
−1
11T
11T
−
.
L := L +
n
n
+
The matrix L+ is also real, symmetric, and positive semi-definite and its spectrum is 0 < λ−1
n ≤
−1
. . . ≤ λ2 . For further spectral properties of graphs, we refer the reader to [38, 45].
Denote by p ∈ Rn the load profile at the network nodes, where pi is the load at node i for
every i = 1, . . . , n. In the context of power grids the i-th entry of the vector p models the power
generated (if pi > 0) or consumed (if pi < 0) at node i. We say that a load profile p ∈ Rn is
balanced if 1T p = 0.
Given a network with a balanced load profile p ∈ Rn , we define its total loss H = H(p) as
1
H := pT L+ p.
2
The scalar quantity H is a quadratic form of the load profile vector p and, as such, is always
non-negative, thanks to the fact that L+ is a positive semi-definite matrix.
The total loss H will be central in our analysis. H is the most natural choice for an efficiency
metric in a lossy transport network as H quantifies the total losses occurred in the network
when subject to a given load profile. More specifically, for power systems H has been shown
by [21] to be good approximation for total power loss in AC power grids. The quantity H has
also been considered as measure of the network tension, i.e., the aggregate load of the network
in [20, 24], where it is shown to be monotone along a cascade failure, as long as the network
remains connected.
As we will show later, the total loss H is indeed a generalized total effective resistance in
the sense that it quantifies how robust the network G is against a stochastic load profile with a
predefined covariance structure.
2.1
Stochastic loads and load-sharing factors
In this work we are particularly interested in a transport network with a stochastic load profile,
which means that we will take p to be a multivariate random variable.
More precisely, we will take p to be of the form p = µ + ω, where µ ∈ Rn is the nominal
load profile in the network and ω is a n-dimensional random variable modeling the fluctuations.
We henceforth assume that Eω = 0 and denote by Σ ∈ Rn×n the covariance matrix of the load
fluctuations, namely Σi,j = cov(ωi , ωj ) = E[ωi ωj ]. Nodes in which there are no stochastic load
fluctuations can be modelled by setting all the entries equal to zero in the corresponding row
and column of the matrix Σ. We denote by S ⊆ V the subset of nodes with stochastic load
fluctuations and we will henceforth assume that |S| ≥ 1.
We further assume that the load profile is balanced on average, namely 1T µ = 0. This
assumption, however, does not guarantee that every realization of the load profile is balanced:
4
indeed, the total mismatch 1T p in the network is a random variable, which is distributed as the
sum of fluctuations, since
n
X
T
T
T
1 p = 1 (p − µ) = 1 ω =
ωi .
i=1
Let σ 2 := Var
as
P
n
i=1
ωi be the variance of the sum of the load fluctuations, which also rewrites
2
σ =
n
X
Σi,j = 1T Σ1 = tr(Σ11T ).
(1)
i,j=1
Since we assumed that there is at least one node with stochastic load fluctuations, we have σ 2 > 0.
In order to cope with the stochastic fluctuations and, in particular, to keep the network
balanced, we assume that load at each node is controllable: for every i = 1, . . . , n, node i can
deal with (either
Pn generate or store) a controllable fraction αi ∈ R of the realized total mismatch
T
1 (p − µ) = i=1 ωi . In other words, we assume that while using the load-sharing coefficients
α = (α1 , . . . , αn ) ∈ Rn the net load profile p(α) is given by
p(α) = p1 −α1
n
X
i=1
ωi , . . . , pn −αn
n
X
ωi = µ1 +ω1 −α1
i=1
n
X
ωi , . . . , µn +ωn −αn
i=1
n
X
ωi .
i=1
P
For any j = 1, . . . , n, the term αj ni=1 ωi corresponds to the power generated or stored in
the corresponding controllable load when using an affine control responsive to stochastic load
fluctuations. We can rewrite the net power injection p(α) in matrix form as
p(α) = Cα p = Cα (µ + ω) = µ + Cα ω,
where Cα ∈ Rn×n is the matrix defined as
1 − α1 −α1
...
−α1
−α2 1 − α2 −α2 . . .
−α2
...
..
..
T
.
.
Cα := I − α 1 =
.
..
..
.
−αn
. . . −αn 1 − αn
(2)
.
Note that the last equality in (2) follows from the fact that 1T µ = 0 since Cα µ = (I − α 1T )µ =
µ − 0 · α = µ. When the load-sharing coefficient α is used, the total mismatch in the network is
equal to
1T p(α) = 1T Cα (µ + ω) = 1T (I − α 1T )ω = (1T − (1T α)1T )ω.
Therefore, since we want the net load profile to be balanced for any realization ω, we need to
impose that
n
X
T
1 α=
αi = 1.
(3)
i=1
We remark that the affine control modelled via the load-sharing vector α is a simplification,
especially when the controllable loads models energy storage. Indeed, it does not incorporate
many details, among which possible ramping constraints or the current state of charge. In our
model such details are omitted on purpose to have a mathematically tractable optimization
5
problem and to better identify the interplay between load uncertainty and storage operations. A
further simplification we make is that we allow to choose α without invoking line limits, as we
also do this for mathematical tractability, see Section 6 for further comments. Note that affine
control is fairly common in power systems operations, see, e.g., [4].
2.2
Expected total loss: definition and properties
For any 1 ≤ k ≤ n, we can model a network where exactly k nodes have controllable loads by
imposing that the remaining n − k nodes have load-sharing coefficients equal to zero, so that for
any such node pi = pi (α). Using the net load profile p(α), the total loss rewrites as
1
H(α) = p(α)T L+ p(α),
2
and therefore {H(α)}α∈Rn is a family of random variables parametrized by the control α. Being
a quadratic form and being L+ a positive semi-definite matrix, it immediately follows that H(α)
is a non-negative random variable for any α ∈ Rn .
The next proposition shows how, leveraging the properties of the matrices L+ and Cα , the
expected total loss EH(α) rewrites as the sum of two contributions, one stochastic and one
deterministic which is not affected by the control α. Furthermore, the expected total loss is
rewritten as a quadratic function the load-sharing vector α. The proof of this proposition is
presented in Appendix A.
Proposition 2.1. Consider a network with nominal load profile µ such that 1T µ = 0 and
zero-mean stochastic fluctuations described by a covariance matrix Σ. Then, the expected total
loss using the control α is given by
1
EH(α) = EHs (α) + µT L+ µ,
2
(4)
where EHs (α) is the expected total loss due to the stochastic fluctuations. Furthermore, EHs (α) ≥
0 for every α ∈ Rn , and the following identity holds:
EHs (α) =
σ2 T +
1
(α L α) − 1T ΣL+ α + tr(ΣL+ ).
2
2
(5)
The first important remark is that the expected total loss EH(α) is a quadratic form in the
vector α ∈ Rn since it can be rewritten as
EH(α) =
σ2 T
α Aα − bT α + c,
2
(6)
where A = L+ is a positive semi-definite matrix, σ 2 > 0, b = L+ Σ1 ∈ Rn , and c = tr(ΣL+ )/2 +
1 T +
µ L µ ∈ R+ . Furthermore, we can already conclude that the nominal load profile µ has no
2
impact on the optimal control α, since it appears only in the constant term c.
A second important observation is that a closer look to (5) reveals that if the covariance
matrix is multiplied by a factor δ > 0, the resulting expected total loss is also δ times the original
one.
Before investigating what is the optimal load-sharing vector for a given network and covariance
structure of the noise, we argue here why the quantity EH(α) can be seen as a generalized notion
of effective resistance. In order to do so, we will first recall some classical definitions.
6
The effective resistance Ri,j between a pair of nodes i and j of the network G is defined as
the electrical resistance measured across nodes i and j when we look at G as electrical network
−1
in which resistors with conductance w1−1 , . . . , wm
are placed at the corresponding network edges.
Equivalently,
+
+
Ri,j := (ei − ej )T L+ (ei − ej ) = L+
i,i + Lj,j − 2Li,j .
The total effective resistance of a graph G is then defined as
n
1X
Rtot (G) :=
Ri,j .
2 i,j=1
The same quantity is also known as Kirchhoff index when the network G is such that all the edge
weights are equal to 1. This is a key quantity that measures how well connected the network
is and for this reason has been extensively studied and rediscovered in various contexts, such
as complex network analysis [13], theoretical chemistry, see [47] and references therein for an
overview, and probability theory [12]. In the context of electrical networks the total effective
resistance Rtot (G) is shown in [17] to be proportional to the average power dissipated in a resistive
network (G, w) when random i.i.d. currents with zero mean and unit variance are injected at the
nodes.
We can look at the network (G, w, α) with controllable loads introduced earlier as a flexible
transport network, where the load-sharing coefficients α1 , . . . , αn can be tuned to respond
optimally to specific stochastic load fluctuations. In this respect, we claim that the quantity
EHs (α) can be seen as a (rescaled) generalized total effective resistance that measures how
“robust” the network (G, w, α) is against stochastic load fluctuations with covariance structure Σ.
To further corroborate this claim, we now show that the expected total loss reduces to the classical
total effective resistance Rtot (G) in the special case where the load-sharing coefficients are all
equal, i.e., αi = 1/n for every i = 1, . . . , n, and the stochastic load fluctuations are i.i.d. random
variables with with zero mean and unit variance, i.e., Σ = I. Using (5), the expected total loss
due to fluctuations rewrites as
1
n
1
1
Rtot (G)
EHs 1 = 2 (1T L+ 1) − 1T L+ 1 + tr(L+ ) = tr(L+ ) =
,
(7)
n
2n
2
2
2n
where in the last step we use the well-known identity Rtot (G) = n · tr(L+ ) proved by [23] that
relates the total effective resistance of a graph with its spectrum.
Rayleigh’s monotonicity principle [12] states that the pairwise effective resistance Ri,j is
a non-increasing function of the edge weights and, as a consequence, also the total effective
resistance Rtot (G) is. The following proposition, proved in Appendix A, shows that a similar
property also holds for H(α): regardless of the load-sharing vector α, the total power loss does
not increase when edges are added or weights are increased.
Proposition 2.2 (Monotonicity of total power loss). Let G be a weighted connected graph and
let G0 the graph obtained from G by increasing the weight of edge e = (i, j) by β > 0 or by adding
the edge e = (i, j) with weight β > 0. For any load-sharing vector α ∈ Rn and any realization of
the stochastic load fluctuations ω, the following inequality holds
0
HG (α) ≤ HG (α),
0
and, in particular, EHG (α) ≤ EHG (α).
7
3
Optimal load-sharing control
In this section we consider the problem of minimizing the expected total loss EH(α) given a
network G and a stochastic load covariance structure Σ.
Let B ⊆ V be the subset of k nodes with controllable loads. We focus first on the scenario
in which not all the nodes have controllable loads and thus assume 1 ≤ k < n. Besides the
constraint (3), we further add n − k constraints on the optimal load-sharing vector α ∈ Rn
to account for the absence of controllable loads in the nodes in V \ B, obtaining the following
constrained optimization problem in Rn :
minα∈Rn EHs (α)
(8)
s.t. 1T α = 1,
αv = 0, ∀ v ∈ V \ B.
Note we consider only the expected total loss due to stochastic load fluctuations in the objective
function, since in view of (4) it differs only by a constant from the expected total loss.
We henceforth assume that the k nodes with the controllable loads are those with labels
1, . . . , k, i.e., B = {1, . . . , k}. We can make this assumption without loss of generality as it
amounts to a relabelling the network nodes. If this is the case, the rows and columns of matrices
L, L+ , and Σ and the entries of the vector µ are also rearranged accordingly.
e ∈ Rk to
Let PB ∈ {0, 1}n×k be the binary matrix that maps any k-dimensional vector α
n
e = (α
e 1, . . . , α
e k , 0, . . . , 0) ∈ R . Such a matrix can be defined
the n-dimensional vector PB α
component-wise as (PB )i,j := δ{i=j} δ{i≤k} , for i = 1, . . . , n and j = 1, . . . , k, and has the following
structure:
I
PB = k ,
O
where Ik is the k × k identity matrix and O ∈ Rn−k×k is a matrix with all entries equal to zero.
In our first main result we present a closed-form expression for the optimal load-sharing
factors of k controllables.
Theorem 3.1 (Optimal load-sharing between k < n controllables). Consider a network with
balanced nominal load profile 1T µ = 0 in which the nodes in B = {1, . . . , k} have controllable
e ∗ 0), with
loads. The solution of the optimization problem (8) is the load-sharing vector α∗ = (α
1 + −1
1 + −1
−1 T + Σ1
∗
e = (LB ) 1 + Ik − (LB ) J (L+
α
∈ Rk ,
(9)
B ) PB L
tB
tB
σ2
+
+ −1
+
T +
T
where L+
B is the k × k principal submatrix of L , i.e., LB := PB L PB , and tB := 1 (LB ) 1 > 0.
If all the nodes with stochastic load fluctuations have controllable loads, i.e., S ⊆ B, then
e∗ =
α
Σ1
,
σ2
(10)
e ∗v = 0 for every v ∈ B \ S.
and, in particular, α
The involved expression (9) for the optimal load-sharing factors reflects the interplay that
exists between the network structure, the location of the controllable loads B, and the correlation
structure of the load fluctuations in determining the losses.
8
In the special case where all the nodes with stochastic load fluctuations have controllable loads
there is a nice interpretation for the optimal load-sharing coefficients: indeed α∗i is proportional
to how much the stochastic fluctuations of node i contribute in relative terms to the variance of
the total mismatch, since
P
n
X
Var(ω
)
+
Cov(ωi , ωj )
1
1
i
Pj6=ni
α∗i = 2 eTi Σ1 = 2
Σi,j =
σ
σ j=1
Var( i=1 ωi )
P
Var(ωi ) + j6=i Cov(ωi , ωj )
.
(11)
=P
P
n
Var(ω
)
+
Cov(ω
,
ω
)
k
k
j
j6=k
k=1
We further remark that in the case of i.i.d. stochastic fluctuations in all the nodes, the second
term in (9) vanishes, since the vector Σ1 lies in the null space of L+ (being a multiple of 1), and,
therefore, the optimal control is equal to
(L+
)−1 1
e = T B+ −1 .
α
1 (LB ) 1
∗
In particular, it does not depend depend on the variance of the load fluctuations, but only on the
network structure and on the location B of the controllable loads, both encoded in the matrix
L+
B.
3.1
Full controllability
In this subsection we focus on the special case where the load is controllable in every node,
i.e., B = V , which is not covered in Theorem 3.1. Indeed, the proof method does not work in
this scenario due to the non-invertibility of the graph Laplacian L, and for this reason is treated
separately here.
The problem of minimizing the expected loss EH(α) when all the nodes have controllable
loads can be written as an optimization problem on Rn with a single constraint, namely
(
minα∈Rn EH(α)
(12)
s.t. 1T α = 1.
As mentioned earlier, thanks to Proposition 2.1 we can immediately conclude that the optimal
load-sharing vector does not depend on the vector µ, which appears only in the constant term in
the equality (4) for the expected loss.
The next theorem derives an analytical expression for the optimal solution of this optimization
problem.
Theorem 3.2 (Optimal load-sharing between n controllables). Consider a network G with n
nodes and a balanced nominal load profile 1T µ = 0. The solution of the optimization problem (12)
is the load-sharing vector α∗ given by
Σ1
α∗ = 2 .
σ
The highlight of this result is that in the scenario where all nodes have controllable loads, the
optimal control α∗ does not depend on the graph structure, but only on the covariance structure
of the fluctuations.
9
The same interpretation as in the special case S ⊆ B of Theorem 3.1 holds here for the
optimal load-sharing coefficients: α∗i is proportional to how much the stochastic fluctuations of
node i contribute in relative terms to the variance of the total mismatch, see (11).
In particular, when a node i does not have stochastic load fluctuations, then it is optimal not
to use the controllable load in that node not to do anything, since α∗i = 0 in view of the fact that
the i-th row of Σ is identically zero.
It immediately follows from Theorem 3.2 that when the the stochastic load fluctuations are
independent and identically distributed, the optimal load-sharing factors are all equal, namely
α∗ =
1
1.
n
Furthermore, the expected total loss due to stochastic fluctuations when using the optimal
load-sharing coefficient rewrites as
1 T
1
+
+
∗
tr(ΣL ) − 2 1 ΣL Σ1 .
EHs (α ) =
2
σ
In this special case, the fact that EHs (α∗ ) ≥ 0 can equivalently be proved as follows:
p
p
1T ΣL+ Σ1 = tr(ΣL+ ΣJ) ≤ tr((ΣL+ )2 )tr((ΣJ)2 ) ≤ tr(ΣL+ )2 tr(ΣJ)2 = tr(ΣL+ )tr(ΣJ) = σ 2 tr(ΣL+ ).
where both the inequalities leverage in a crucial way that all the matrices Σ, J, L+ are positive
semi-definite. The first inequality follows from the fact that in the space of positive semi-definite
matrices trace is a proper inner-product and thus obeys Cauchy-Schwarz inequality,
p
tr(AB) ≤ tr(A2 ) tr(B 2 )
∀ A, B positive semi-definite matrices.
The second inequality follows from the fact that tr(A2 ) ≤ tr(A)2 for any positive semi-definite
matrix A, obtained by applying Cauchy-Schwarz inequality with A = B.
4
Scaling properties of the expected total loss
In this section we explore the relation between the expected total loss and the number of
controllable loads. Even if the intuition suggests that the expected total loss should be a
decreasing function in the number of controllable loads, but this may not be true in general,
as the total loss depends both on the location of the controllable loads as well as on the the
load-sharing factors. For instance, in Section 5 we present a counterexample of a network in
which by adding the one controllable load and readjusting the load-share factors to be all equal,
the expected total power loss increases.
To get rid of these heterogeneities and obtain a more transparent result for the impact of
the number of controllable loads, we calculate the expected total loss for a fixed number of
controllable loads averaging on all their possible locations and assuming they share equally the
load. Consider an integer 1 ≤ k ≤ n and denote by Bk ⊂ Rn the collection of load-sharing vectors
with exactly k non-zero identical entries (and thus equal to 1/k, in view of (3)), namely
(
)
1X
Bk :=
ei : B ⊆ V, |B| = k ,
k i∈B
10
where ei ∈ Rn is the vector with the i-th entry equal to 1 and zero elsewhere.
Let Hk denote the expected total loss due to stochastic load fluctuations averaging over all
their possible locations of k controllable nodes share equally the load, i.e.,
1 X
Hk :=
EHs (α).
|Bk | α∈B
k
n
This average consists of |Bk | = k terms, one for each possible displacement of k controllable
nodes in a network with n nodes. The following theorem states an explicit expression for Hk that
makes the dependence on the number of controllable node k very explicit, showing in particular
that Hk is, up to a constant, proportional to 1/k.
Theorem 4.1 (Average total loss with k controllable loads). Consider a network G of n nodes
with balanced nominal profile load, i.e., 1T µ = 0. Then,
Hk = C1 +
C2
,
k
where C1 , C2 ∈ R are two constants that do not depend on k given by
1
tr(L+ )
C1 := tr(ΣL+ ) − σ 2
2
2n(n − 1)
and
C2 := σ 2
tr(L+ )
.
2(n − 1)
Both the constants C1 and C2 depend on the graph structure via L+ , on its size n, and on the
covariance matrix Σ. We remark that the constant C2 is always strictly positive, as tr(L+ ) > 0
(L+ being a positive semi-definite matrix) and σ 2 > 0, in view of (1).
We are interested in understanding how the expected total loss scales for large graphs. Assume
we can take a sequence of graphs {Gn }n∈N of growing size, |Vn | = n, and of covariance matrices
{Σn }n∈N with total variance σn2 = 1T Σn 1, so that the limit
(n − 1) tr(Σn L+
n)
n→∞
σn2 tr(L+
n)
γ := lim
exists. Note that the fact that inequality Hn ≥ 0 holds for every n ∈ N (see Proposition 2.1)
guarantees that γ ≥ 0. Under these assumptions, we have that the relative gain of having k
controllable loads with respect to a single one scales as
Hk
1
1
1
1
1
1
lim
=
+
=
+
.
2 tr(L+ )
−1
σn
(n−1) tr(Σn L+
n−1
n−1
n→∞ H1
n
n) k
1+γ
1+γ k
1 + limn→∞ n (n−1) tr(Σ L+ )
+
lim
+
n→∞
2
n
σ tr(L )
n
n
n
n
In the scenario where the load fluctuations are independent and identically distributed, regardless
of the graph structure, the asymptotic scaling reads
lim
n→∞
Hk
1
1
= + .
H1
2 2k
as
(13)
(n − 1) tr(Σn L+
(n − 1) σn2 tr(L+
n−1
n)
n)
=
lim
=
lim
= 1.
n→∞
n→∞
n→∞
σn2 tr(L+
n σn2 tr(L+
n
n)
n)
In Subsection 5.5 we show numerically that the way the expected total loss scales on average
with the number of controllable loads as stated in Theorem 4.1 is pretty accurate in general, even
without averaging over all possible locations of the controllable loads.
γ = lim
11
5
Numerical examples
5.1
Impact of covariance structure
The next two figures illustrates how the covariance structure influence the optimal control for
a small network of 12 nodes. Figure 1 covers the case in which all the nodes have stochastic
load fluctuations, i.e., S = V , while in Figure 2 we present a scenario where S ( V . In both
figures the nodes with controllable loads are drawn as squares, whose area is proportional to the
corresponding load-sharing factor.
3
3
3
9
9
8
2
9
8
2
2
4
4
5
5
12
12
5
7
7
8
4
12
7
6
6
6
11
11
(a) i.i.d. load fluctuations
e ∗ = (0.3167, 0.4826, 0.2007)
α
11
(b) Independent but not identically
distributed load fluctuations
e ∗ = (0.3335, 0.4876, 0.1789)
α
(c) Correlated load fluctuations
e ∗ = (0.4109, 0.3841, 0.2050)
α
Figure 1: Example of a stochastic loss transport network in which all nodes have stochastic load
fluctuations but with different covariance structure.
The correlation matrix Σc used for Figure 1 is generated at random in case (c) and is such
that σc2 = 1T Σc 1 = 50.42. The correlation matrix Σb one used in case (b) is obtained using the
diagonal entries of Σc . Note that both in case (a) and (b), the correlation matrices have been
rescaled so that their total variance is still equal to σa2 = σb2 = σc2 . The correlation matrices for
Figure 2 are obtained analogously.
3
3
3
9
9
8
2
9
8
2
4
5
12
7
4
5
12
7
5
12
7
6
6
11
(a) i.i.d. fluctuations
e ∗ = (0.2571, 0.5162, 0.2267)
α
8
2
4
6
11
(b) Independent but not identically
distributed fluctuations
e ∗ = (0.2624, 0.5317, 0.2059)
α
11
(c) Correlated fluctuations
e ∗ = (0.2011, 0.5504, 0.2485)
α
Figure 2: Example of a stochastic loss transport network with different covariance structure for
the load fluctuations. The nodes in black are those with stochastic load fluctuations.
12
5.2
Relative position of controllable loads and stochastic nodes
Figure 3 visualizes the optimal load-sharing factors in the scenario where the subset of stochastic
nodes is fixed, S = {1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11}, as well as the covariance matrix, but the displacement of the
controllable loads, i.e., the subset B, changes.
12
12
1
1
11
12
1
2
10
10
2
2
3
9
10
3
9
4
8
11
11
3
9
8
4
4
8
5
7
5
6
(a) S ⊂ B = {1, 4, 5, 7, 10, 11}
EHs (α∗ ) = 2.8825
7
5
6
7
6
(b) S 6⊂ B = {1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11}
EHs (α∗ ) = 3.3552
(c) S ⊂ B c , B = {2, 5, 6, 8, 9, 12}
EHs (α∗ ) = 3.8134
Figure 3: Example of a stochastic loss transport network with the same covariance structure for
the load fluctuations, but different displacement of the controllable loads and the corresponding
expected total loss.
Figure 3(a) presents the scenario in which S ⊆ B and the optimal control for the nodes in
B \ S = {5, 11} is equal to zero, as prescribed by Theorem 3.1. In the other two cases, (b) and
(c), we picked subsets B of controllable loads such that S 6⊆ B and the corresponding value of
the expected losses suggest it is optimal to place the controllable loads in the nodes affected by
stochastic fluctuations.
5.3
Negative load-sharing coefficients
The fact that a load-sharing
corresponding node absorbs
P factor is non-negative means that theP
part of power excess (if ni=1 ωi > 0) and balance out shortages (if ni=1 ωi < 0). In most of the
related work in primary response mechanisms and autonomous generation controls for power
grids, the load-sharing coefficients (often called participation factors) are in fact taken to be
non-negative, i.e., αv ≥ 0 for all v ∈ B. This assumption tacitly implies that all the controllable
generators and storage have “coordinated” actions, in the sense that they either all increase or
all decrease their power output.
In our formulation of the optimization problems (8) and (12) we do not make such an
assumption and load-sharing factors can also be negative, as long as the condition (3) is met.
This is crucial as for certain covariance structures of the load fluctuations (especially when there
are strong negative correlations) it is optimal to have negative load-sharing coefficients in some
nodes: we illustrate this fact for a small network illustrated in Figure 4.
13
2
3
4
1
Figure 4: A small network modeled by a graph with n = 4 nodes and m = 4 edges with unit
weights
Table 1 below lists the optimal load-sharing factors α∗ corresponding to different set of
controllable loads in the network in Figure 4 where the load fluctuations covariance structure is
assumed to be
1
0
0
−0.5
0
1
0
−0.5
.
Σ=
0
0
1
−0.5
−0.5 −0.5 −0.5
1
The best way for the controllable loads to respond to the negative correlations that the load
fluctuations have in this network is having the controllable load in node 4 taking actions “mirroring”
those of the other three nodes, in the sense that α∗4 < 0 while the load-sharing coefficients of the
other nodes in B are always positive.
B
α∗ (B)
{1, 4}
{6/5, 0, 0, −1/5}
{1, 2, 4}
{2/3, 2/3, 0, −1/3}
{1, 2, 3, 4} {1/2, 1/2, 1/2, −1/2}
Table 1: Sets of controllable loads for the network in Figure 4 with the corresponding optimal
load-sharing factors
5.4
Non-monotonicity of expected power loss when adding controllable loads
An extra controllable load always reduces the expected total power loss if the corresponding
optimal load-sharing vector α∗ is selected, since it corresponds to removing one constraints in the
optimization problem (8). However, if the chosen load-sharing factors of the augmented subset of
controllable loads are not the optimal ones, adding an extra controllable load does not necessarily
reduce the expected total power loss. We illustrate this with an example in which the control is
assumed to be equal-share between the controllable loads in B. Consider the network given in
Figure 5 and assume that the stochastic loads are i.i.d. with unit variance.
14
3
4
2
1
5
Figure 5: A small network modeled by a graph with n = 7 nodes and m = 9 edges with unit
weights
Table 2 below lists the expected total power losses for some subsets B of controllable loads
and compares them with those for some augmented subset B ∪ {4}.
B
{2}
{2, 5}
{2, 6, 7}
EH(B) EH(B ∪ {4})
2.6875
3.0625
2.0625
2.13194
1.79861
1.84375
Table 2: Expected total power losses for the network in Figure 5 assuming equal load-sharing
coefficients for some subsets B of controllable loads and then for the subsets augmented with an
extra node, namely B ∪ {4}.
5.5
Empirical evidence of the scaling law (13)
In the following example we consider the IEEE RTS 96-bus test network and track the expected
total loss while adding one by one controllable loads in random locations and assuming equal
share among the available controllable loads. As illustrated by Figure 6, the theoretical scaling
for the expected total loss scales with the number of controllable loads stated in Theorem 4.1
while averaging on all possible locations is in fact very accurate also for a single instance where
new controllable locations are randomly added.
15
70
70
60
60
50
50
40
40
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
10
(a) I.i.d. load fluctuations
20
30
40
50
60
70
(b) Independent but not identically distributed load
fluctuations
70
60
50
40
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
(c) Correlated load fluctuations
Figure 6: Theoretical scaling (in red) as predicted by Theorem 4.1 vs. empirical total loss (in
black) while adding controllable loads one by one in random locations.
6
Concluding remarks
In this paper we consider a stochastic lossy transport network in which some nodes have
controllable loads and derive a closed-form expression for the optimal control when aiming to
minimize the average total loss. The model is inspired by power systems where distributed energy
resources can be used as virtual storage to mitigate the fluctuations in the power generated by
renewable energy sources. Our analysis (i) uncovers a interplay between the network structure,
the location of the controllable loads and the covariance structure of the load fluctuations and (ii)
give insights in how much the average total loss can be reduced by adding a certain number of
controllable loads to the network.
The stylized mathematical model considered in the present paper gives useful insight in
understanding how the optimal displacement and operations of distributed energy resources are
affected by correlated load fluctuations. For this reason complements the recent efforts in the
electrical engineering community in upgrading the existing models for power grids to account
both for the intrinsic volatility of renewable energy generation and storage capabilities, see,
e.g., [22, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29].
In the present work we do not account for line limits, aiming to get a transparent insight in
the interplay between load uncertainty and optimal storage operations. Nonetheless, we remark
that the quadratic form we consider as a objective function can be rewritten as weighted sum of
16
the line flows squared and for this reason the optimal control should prevents line flows from
being too large and in particular above the corresponding line capacities.
The optimization problems considered in this paper focus on the network efficiency and do
not account for economic factors and neither prevents the excessive usage of controllable loads.
Both these factors can be accounted for by adding an additional term to the objective in the
optimization problems (12) and (8) of the form αT P α + q T α with P is the diagonal matrix with
positive entries P1,1 , . . . , Pn,n on the diagonal and q = (q1 , . . . , qn ) is a vector with non-negative
entries.
Let ξ be a positive real number that weights the relative importance of the penalty/cost term
αT P α + q T α with respect to the average total loss. The generalized optimization problem reads
(
minα∈Rn EH(α) + ξ (αT P α + q T α)
(14)
s.t. 1T α = 1,
The solution of this constrained optimization problem is
σ2
−1
−1
σ2
∗
+
+
L + ξP
L + ξP
α =
δ1 + I + δJ
(ξq + Σ1),
2
2
−1 −1
with δ := 1
+ ξP
1
, and can be obtained in a similar way of that in Theorem 3.1,
leveraging the fact that the matrix L+ + ξP is positive definite.
Such an extension can be instrumental to explore the trade-off between the best operations
for the network and the corresponding cost or penalties for the excessive usage of the controllable
nodes. This is particularly relevant for instance in the design of primary response mechanisms
and autonomous generation controls for power grids [1, 6, 18, 19, 30, 39, 42]. In these works
only economic criteria are considered to tune the load-sharing coefficients and therefore combining them with a network performance metric such as the expected total loss could be interesting.
T
σ2 +
L
2
Acknowledgment: This research is supported by NWO VICI grant 639.033.413 and NWO
Rubicon grant 680.50.1529.
Appendices
A
Properties of the total power loss
Proof. Proof of Proposition 2.1. Using the expression for Cα in (2), we can rewrite H(α) as
1
1
1
H(α) = (µ + Cα ω)T L+ (µ + Cα ω) = µT L+ µ + ω T CαT L+ Cα ω + µT L+ Cα ω.
2
2
2
Note that one of the terms on the RHS, namely 12 µT L+ µ, is not random and does not depend on
the control α. Define the random variable
1
1
Hs (α) := H(α) − µT L+ µ = ω T CαT L+ Cα ω + µT L+ Cα ω,
2
2
17
(15)
which describes precisely the contribution of the stochastic fluctuations to the transportation
losses. From the fact that L+ is a positive semi-definite matrix it follows that
1 T T +
1
ω Cα L Cα ω = (Cα ω)T L+ (Cα ω) ≥ 0 ∀ ω ∈ Rn .
2
2
(16)
Combining (15), (16), and the fact that E(µT L+ Cα ω) = µL+ Cα Eω = 0 yields that
1 T T +
ω Cα L Cα ω ≥ 0.
EHs (α) = E
2
Applying a classic result for quadratic forms of random vector, see Corollary 3.2b.1 in [31] and
using the fact that Eω = 0, we derive
1 T T +
1
(17)
E
ω Cα L Cα ω = tr(CαT L+ Cα Σ),
2
2
which yields
EHs (α) =
1
tr(CαT L+ Cα Σ),
2
since E(µT L+ Cα ω) = µL+ Cα Eω = 0.
We now derive identity (5). Recall the following well-known properties of the trace of matrix:
(i) The trace is invariant under cyclic permutations, i.e., for any r ∈ N
tr(A1 . . . Ar ) = tr(A2 . . . Ar A1 ) = . . . = tr(Ar A1 . . . Ar−1 ).
(ii) The trace of a matrix and of its transpose coincide, i.e., tr(A) = tr(AT );
(iii) The trace of the outer product of two vectors is their inner product, namely
tr(vwT ) = tr(v ⊗ w) = v T w.
First note that we can rewrite
CαT L+ Cα = (I − α 1T )T L+ (I − α 1T ) = (I − 1 αT )(L+ − L+ α 1T )
= L+ − L+ α 1T − 1 αT L+ + 1 αT L+ α 1T .
(18)
The aforementioned properties of the trace yield
(ii)
(i)
tr(ΣL+ α 1T ) = tr((ΣL+ α 1T )T ) = tr(1αT L+ Σ) = tr(Σ1αT L+ ),
(19)
and
(iii)
(iii)
tr(Σ1αT L+ ) = tr(Σ1(L+ α)T ) = tr((Σ1) ⊗ (L+ α)) = (Σ1)T (L+ α) = 1T ΣL+ α.
(20)
By combining all these equalities and exploiting the linearity of the trace operator, we obtain
(18)
tr(ΣCαT L+ Cα ) = tr(ΣL+ ) − tr(ΣL+ α 1T ) − tr(Σ1 αT L+ ) + tr(Σ1 αT L+ α 1T )
(19)
= tr(ΣL+ ) − 2 · tr(Σ1 αT L+ ) + (αT L+ α) · tr(Σ1 1T )
(20)
= tr(ΣL+ ) − 2 · (1T ΣL+ α) + (αT L+ α) · tr(ΣJ),
where in the second step we also used the fact that αT L+ α is a scalar.
18
Proof. Proof of Proposition 2.2 Assume that e = (i, j) ∈ (V × V ) is the edge with weight
β > 0 that has been added to G or whose edge weight has been increased by β > 0 and let
me = (ei − ej ) ∈ Rn be the corresponding non-weighted incidence vector. In both cases the
Laplacian matrix of the newly obtained graph G0 can be written as
LG0 = LG + β me mTe
and, using the generalized version of the Sherman-Morrison formula in [35], we get
+
L+
G0 = LG −
β −1
1
T +
L+
G me me LG .
+ mTe L+
m
e
G
We can thus rewrite the total loss corresponding to any net power injection vector p(α) as
1
0
HG (α) = p(α)T LG0 p(α)
2
1
1
T +
= p(α)T L+
p(α)T L+
G p(α) −
G me me LG p(α)
−1
2
2(β + mTe L+
m
)
e
G
T +
2
(me LG p(α))
,
= HG (α) −
2(β −1 + mTe L+
G me )
T +
2
and conclude by noticing that mTe L+
G me ≥ 0 and (me LG p(α)) ≥ 0.
B
Proof of Theorem 3.1
In the proof of Theorem 3.1 we will make use of the so-called block matrix inversion formula,
which is stated in the next lemma.
Lemma
B.1 (Block matrix inversion formula). Consider a matrix with the block structure
A B
. If both A and D − CA−1 B are non-singular matrices, then
C D
A B
C D
−1
=
A−1 − A−1 B(D − CA−1 B)−1 CA−1 −A−1 B(D − CA−1 B)−1
.
−(D − CA−1 B)−1 CA−1
(D − CA−1 B)−1
Proof. Proof of Theorem 3.1. For any vector α ∈ Rn which is such that αi = 0 for every node
e Using this
e ∈ Rk such that α = PB α.
i ∈ V \ B, there exists a unique k-dimensional vector α
T
correspondence and the fact that the nominal load profile is balanced, i.e., 1 µ = 0, we can
rewrite
2
1
(4) σ
e T PBT L+ PB α)
e =
e − 1T ΣL+ PB α
e + tr(ΣL+ ).
EHs (α) = EH(PB α)
(α
2
2
Therefore the n-dimensional optimization problem (8) rewrites as a k-dimensional optimization
problem with a single constraint, namely
2
min σ (α
e T PBT L+ PB α)
e − 1T ΣL+ PB α
e
k 2
(21)
e
α∈R
T
e = 1.
s.t. 1 α
19
T +
k×k
The matrix L+
is positive definite, as for any vector v ∈ Rk , v 6= 0,
B := PB L PB ∈ R
+ v
T +
T T +
> 0,
v LB v = v PB L PB v = (v 0) L
0
where the last inequality follows from the fact that the vector (v 0) is not a multiple of the vector
1 and thus does not lie in the null space of L+ . The optimization problem in (21) has then a
unique solution, since the corresponding Hessian is positive definite.
Let γ ∈ R be the Lagrange multiplier γ associated with the unique equality constraint of the
optimization problem (21). The associated Lagrangian associated is
e γ) =
L(α,
σ2 T T +
e − γ(1T α
e − 1).
e − (PBT L+ Σ1)T α
e (PB L PB )α
α
2
Setting b := PBT L+ Σ1 ∈ Rk , the optimality conditions read
(
e − γ1 = b,
σ 2 L+
Bα
T
e = 1,
1 α
or, equivalently, in matrix form
2 +
e
σ LB −1
α
b
=
.
T
γ
1
1
0
(22)
Being positive definite, L+
B is invertible and its inverse is also positive definite, which means that
+ −1
+
T
tB := 1 (LB ) 1 > 0. In view of the fact that σ 2 t−1
B 6= 0 and LB is invertible, we can use the
block matrix inversion formula given in Lemma B.1 to obtain
1
1
1
+ −1
+ −1
+ −1
2 +
−1
(L )
(L ) 1
I − J(LB )
σ LB −1
σ2 B
tB
tB B
=
.
2
T
σ
1 T + −1
1
0
1 (LB )
tB
tB
The solution of the linear system (22) then reads
1
1
1
+ −1
+ −1
+ −1
2 +
−1
(L
J(L
(L
)
I
−
)
)
1
B
B
e
σ LB −1
α
b
σ2 B
b
t
t
B
B
=
=
σ2
1 T + −1
γ
1
1
1T
0
1 (LB )
tB
tB
e ∈ Rk is given by
and thus the optimal load-sharing vector α
−1
(L+
1
1
+ −1
∗
B)
e =
α
I − J(LB )
b + (L+
)−1 1
2
σ
t
tB B
1
1 + −1
b
+ −1
+ −1
= (LB ) 1 + (LB )
I − J(LB )
tB
tB
σ2
1 + −1
1 + −1
Σ1
+ −1
+ −1
= (LB ) 1 + (LB ) − (LB ) J(LB )
PBT L+ 2
tB
tB
σ
1
1 + −1
−1
−1 T + Σ1
= (L+
(LB ) J (L+
.
B) 1 + I −
B ) PB L
tB
tB
σ2
20
We now focus on the special case where S ⊆ B and prove identity (10). Rewrite L+ as a block
matrix
+
LB
L+
C
,
T
(L+
L+
C)
Bc
+
k×k
k×n−k
n−k×n−k
with L+
, L+
and L+
. Note that L+
B ∈ R
C ∈ R
Bc ∈ R
B and LB c are symmetric
matrices, since L+ is. Note that this is consistent with the former definition of L+
B , since
+
LB
L+
T +
T
T
C
PB L PB = (Ik | O)L+ (Ik | O) = (Ik | O)
(Ik | O) = L+
+
T
B.
(L+
)
L
c
C
B
First note that
−1 T +
(L+
B ) PB L
=
−1
(L+
B ) (Ik | O)
L+
L+
B
C
+
T
(L+
)
L
C
Bc
+
+
+ −1 +
−1
k×n
= (L+
B ) (LB | LC ) = (Ik | (LB ) LC ) ∈ R
From the assumption S ⊆ B it follows that the covariance matrix can be rewritten as
ΣB O
Σ=
,
O O
where ΣB ∈ Rk×k is itself a covariance matrix. Trivially 1T (ΣB | O)1 = tr(ΣB J) = tr(ΣJ) = σ 2 .
Furthermore,
ΣB O
+ −1 T +
+ −1 T + ΣB O
+ −1 +
(LB ) PB L Σ = (LB ) PB L
= (Ik | (LB ) LC )
= (ΣB | O).
O O
O O
e ∗ then rewrites as
The optimal control α
−1
−1
(L+
(L+
∗
−1 T + Σ1
B)
B) J
e =
α
1 + Ik −
(L+
B ) PB L
tB
tB
σ2
(L+ )−1
(L+ )−1 J
1
= B
1 + Ik − B
(ΣB | O) 2
tB
tB
σ
+ −1
+ −1
1
1T (ΣB | O)1
(L )
(L )
= B
1 + (ΣB | O) 2 − B
1
tB
σ
tB
σ2
+ −1
+ −1
(L )
Σ1 (L )
= B
1+ 2 − B
1
tB
σ
tB
Σ1
= 2.
σ
C
Proof of Theorem 3.2
In (6) we already rewrote the objective function of the optimization problem (12) as
EHs (α) =
σ2 T
α Aα − bT α + c.
2
where A = L+ , b = L+ Σ1 ∈ Rn , and c = tr(ΣL+ )/2 ∈ R+ and notice that, for the purpose of
solving the optimization problem (12), we can ignore the constant term c.
21
We can consider the representation with respect to the orthogonal basis of eigenvectors
, v2 , . . . , vn of L+ of a vector α ∈ R, namely
α = β1 1 + β2 v2 + . . . + βn vn ,
(23)
for some β1 , . . . , βn ∈ R. From the constraint 1T α = 1, it immediately follows that β1 = 1/n.
Indeed,
nβ1 = β1 1T 1 = β1 1T 1 + β2 1T v2 + . . . + βn 1T vn = 1T (β1 1 + β2 v2 + . . . + βn vn ) = 1T α = 1.
Let v2 , . . . , vn be an orthonomal basis of eigenvectors of the graph Laplacian L corresponding to
the non-zero eigenvalues λ2 , . . . , λn and define the real coefficients κ2 , . . . , κn as
κi := hΣ1, vi i = 1T Σvi ,
i = 2, . . . , n.
Leveraging the latter definition and the representation (23), we can rewrite
T
+
T
+
α L α = (β1 1+β2 v2 +. . .+βn vn ) L (β1 1+β2 v2 +. . .+βn vn ) =
n
X
β12 1T L+ 1+
βi2 viT L+ vi
i=2
=
n
X
β2
i
i=2
λi
and
T
T
+
T
+
b α = 1 ΣL α = 1 ΣL (β1 1 + β2 v2 + . . . + βn vn ) =
n
X
βi
i=2
λi
T
1 Σvi =
n
X
i=2
βi
κi
.
λi
By combining the latter two identities, the objective function rewrites as
n
n
σ2 T
σ 2 X βi2 X κi
T
EH(α) = α Aα − b α =
−
βi .
2
2 i=2 λi
λi
i=2
(24)
The optimization problem (12) is therefore equivalent to a unconstrained problem in Rn−1 whose
variables are β2 , . . . , βn . Define the function g : Rn−1 → R as
n
n
σ 2 X βi2 X κi
g(β2 , . . . , βn ) :=
−
βi .
2 i=2 λi
λi
i=2
The gradient of the function g is the vector
κi
2 βi
∇g(β2 , . . . , βn ) = σ
−
λi λi i=2,...,n
−1
and its Hessian matrix of g is the diagonal matrix H(g) = σ 2 · diag(λ−1
2 , . . . , λn ). The Hessian
H(g) is constant as it does not depend on β2 , . . . , βn . Furthermore, H(g) is a positive definite
matrix since all its diagonal terms are positive, in view of the fact that λi > 0 for i = 2, . . . , n
and that σ 2 > 0. This means that any critical point satisfying ∇g(β2 , . . . , βn ) = 0 would then
be a minimum for the function g. The optimality condition ∇g(β2 , . . . , βn ) = 0 can be solved
explicitly, yielding
κi
βi∗ = 2 ,
i = 2, . . . , n.
σ
22
,
As a consequence the optimal load-sharing coefficients are unique and they are given by
n
1
1 X
α = 1+ 2
κi vi .
n
σ i=2
∗
Set v1 =
D
and κ1 = hΣ1, v1 i = 1T Σv1 = 1T Σ √1n 1. Note that α∗ rewrites as
!
!
n
n
n
X
X
X
1
κ
1
1
Σ1
1
1
α∗ = 2 √ 1 + 2
κi vi = 2
κi vi =
hΣ1, vi i vi = 2 .
σ n
σ i=2
σ
a i=1
σ
i=1
√1 1
n
Proof of Theorem 4.1
The starting point of the proof are two identities that leverage the properties of the pseudoinverse
L+ of the graph Laplacian. Firstly,
n
X
X X
X
X
X
+
+
+
ei = L
ei = L
ei 1{i∈B}
L
B⊆V : |B|=k
i∈B
+
=L
B⊆V : |B|=k i∈B
n
X
X
ei
i=1
1{i∈B}
i=1 B⊆V : |B|=k
n
X
n
+
ei
=L
−1
k−1
i=1
B⊆V : |B|=k
n
n−1 +
n − 1 + X
=
L
ei =
L 1 = 0,
k−1
k
−
1
i=1
(25)
where we use the fact that in a graph with n nodes, each nodes belong to exactly
of k nodes. We further claim that
X X T X n − 2
e i L+
ei =
tr(L+ ),
k
−
1
i∈B
i∈B
B⊆V : |B|=k
with the convention that n−2
= 0. Since
n−1
X T X X
X
e i L+
ei =
eTi L+ ei +
eTi L+ ej ,
i∈B
i∈B
we can rewrite the LHS of (26) as
X X T X
ei L+
ei =
B⊆V : |B|=k
i∈B
i∈B
i∈B
X
B⊆V : |B|=k
n−1
k−1
subsets
(26)
i,j∈B, i6=j
X
eTi L+ ei +
i∈B
X
B⊆V : |B|=k
X
eTi L+ ej .
i,j∈B, i6=j
(27)
The first term on the RHS of (27) can be rewritten as
n
X
X
X X
eTi L+ ei =
eTi L+ ei
B⊆V : |B|=k
i∈B
i=1
1{i∈B}
B⊆V : |B|=k
n
X
n
n−1 X T +
n−1 T +
=
e L ei =
e L ei
k−1 i
k − 1 i=1 i
i=1
n
n−1 X +
n−1
=
L =
tr(L+ ),
k − 1 i=1 i,i
k−1
23
while the second term on the RHS of (27) is equal to
X
B⊆V : |B|=k
X
eTi L+ ej
X
=
i,j∈B, i6=j
=
P
X
i6=j
i6=j
n
X
n−2 T +
=
e L ej
k−2 i
i=1
eTi L+ ej = −tr(L+ ), which immediately follows from
eTi L+ ej +
i6=j
n
X
=
1{i∈B, j∈B}
n−2 X T +
n−2
e L ej = −
tr(L+ ).
k − 2 i6=j i
k−2
In the last step we used the fact that
eTi L+ ej + tr(L+ ) =
X
B⊆V : |B|=k
i6=j
X
eTi L+ ej
ek
T
L+
X
L+
i,i =
i
n
X
k=1
X
eTi L+ ej +
X
eTi L+ ei
i
i6=j
ek = 1T L+ 1 = 0.
k=1
Hence, (27) rewrites as
X
B⊆V : |B|=k
X
ei
T
L
+
i∈B
X
ei =
n − 1
n−2
n−2
+
−
tr(L ) =
tr(L+ ),
k−1
k−2
k−1
i∈B
which concludes the proof of identity (26).
P
Each load-sharing vector α ∈ Bk can be written as α = k1 i∈B ei , for some B ⊆ V , |B| = k.
In view of Proposition 2.1, the expected total loss due to stochastic fluctuations when using this
load-sharing vector is given by
!T
!
!
X
X
σ2 1 X
1
1
1
EHs (α) =
ei
L+
ei − 1T ΣL+
ei + tr(ΣL+ ).
2 k i∈B
k i∈B
k i∈B
2
Therefore,
1
1
Hk = tr(ΣL+ ) +
2
|Bk |
"
X
B⊆V : |B|=k
2
σ
2
1X
k
i∈B
ei
T
L+
1 X
k
i∈B
ei − 1T ΣL+
1 X
k
ei
#
.
i∈B
Using (25) and (26), we get
n−2
+
+
1
1
n−k
+
2 tr(L ) k−1
+
2 tr(L )
Hk = tr(ΣL ) + σ
=
tr(ΣL
)
+
σ
n
2
2 k2 k
2
2 k · n(n − 1)
+
1
tr(L+ ) 1 − nk
1
1 1
+
2 tr(L )
= tr(ΣL+ ) + σ 2
=
tr(ΣL
)
+
σ
−
.
2
2n(n − 1) nk
2
2(n − 1) k n
References
[1] D. Apostolopoulou, P. Sauer, and A. Dominguez-Garcia. Automatic Generation Control and
Its Implementation in Real Time. In 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System
Sciences, pages 2444–2452. IEEE, jan 2014.
24
[2] A. Bejan, R. Gibbens, and F. Kelly. Statistical aspects of storage systems modelling in
energy networks. In 46th Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems (CISS),
pages 1–6, Princeton, NJ, mar 2012. IEEE.
[3] D. Bhaumik, D. Crommelin, and B. Zwart. A computational method for optimizing storage
placement to maximize power network reliability. In To appear in the Proceeding of the 2016
Winter Simulation Conference, 2015.
[4] D. Bienstock, M. Chertkov, and S. Harnett. Chance-Constrained Optimal Power Flow:
Risk-Aware Network Control under Uncertainty. SIAM Review, 56(3):461–495, 2014.
[5] D. Bienstock, C. Matke, G. Munoz, and S. Yang. Robust linear control of nonconvex battery
operation in transmission systems. Preprint at arXiv:1610.09432, 2016.
[6] M. Chertkov and Y. Dvorkin. Chance Constrained Optimal Power Flow with Primary
Frequency Response. Preprint at arXiv:1703.06724, 2017.
[7] J. Cruise, L. Flatley, and S. Zachary. Impact of storage competition on energy markets.
Preprint at arXiv:1606.05361, 2016.
[8] J. Cruise, R. Gibbens, and S. Zachary. Optimal control of storage for arbitrage, with
applications to energy systems. In 48th Annual Conference on Information Sciences and
Systems (CISS), number i, 2014.
[9] J. Cruise and S. Zachary. The optimal control of storage for arbitrage and buffering, with
energy applications. Preprint at arXiv:1509.05788, 2015.
[10] C. F. Daganzo. Fundamentals of Transportation and Traffic Operations. Emerald Group
Publishing Limited, sep 1997.
[11] D. Deka, H. Nagarajan, and S. Backhaus. Optimal Topology Design for Disturbance
Minimization in Power Grids. Preprint at arXiv:1703.00558, 2017.
[12] P. G. Doyle and J. L. Snell. Random Walks and Electric Networks. American Mathematical
Monthly, 94(January):202, 2000.
[13] W. Ellens, F. Spieksma, P. Van Mieghem, a. Jamakovic, and R. Kooij. Effective graph
resistance. Linear Algebra and its Applications, 435(10):2491–2506, nov 2011.
[14] N. Gast, J.-Y. Le Boudec, A. Proutière, and D.-C. Tomozei. Impact of storage on the
efficiency and prices in real-time electricity markets. Proceedings of the 4th international
conference on Future energy systems - e-Energy ’13, 2:15, 2013.
[15] N. Gast, D.-C. Tomozei, and J.-Y. Le Boudec. Optimal Storage Policies with Wind Forecast
Uncertainties. ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review, 40(3):1–5, 2012.
[16] N. Gast, D.-C. Tomozei, and J.-Y. Le Boudec. Optimal Generation and Storage Scheduling
in the Presence of Renewable Forecast Uncertainties. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid,
5(3):1328–1339, 2014.
25
[17] A. Ghosh, S. Boyd, and A. Saberi. Minimizing Effective Resistance of a Graph. SIAM
Review, 50(1):37–66, 2008.
[18] S. Guggilam, C. Zhao, E. Dall’Anese, Y. Chen, and S. Dhople. Engineering Inertial and
Primary-frequency Response for Distributed Energy Resources. Preprint at arXiv:1706.03612,
2017.
[19] S. Guggilam, C. Zhao, E. Dall’Anese, Y. Chen, and S. Dhople. Primary frequency response
with aggregated DERs. In 2017 American Control Conference (ACC), pages 3386–3393.
IEEE, may 2017.
[20] L. Guo, C. Liang, and S. Low. Monotonicity Properties and Spectral Characterization
of Power Redistribution in Cascading Failures. Communication, Control, and Computing
(Allerton), 2017 55th Annual Allerton Conference on, 2017.
[21] J. Johnson and M. Chertkov. A majorization-minimization approach to design of power
transmission networks. In 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), pages
3996–4003. IEEE, 2010.
[22] Y. Kanoria, A. Montanari, D. Tse, and B. Zhang. Distributed storage for intermittent energy
sources: Control design and performance limits. In 49th Annual Allerton Conference on
Communication, Control, and Computing, pages 1310–1317, 2011.
[23] D. J. Klein and M. Randić. Resistance distance. Journal of Mathematical Chemistry,
12(1):81–95, 1993.
[24] C. Lai and S. Low. The redistribution of power flow in cascading failures. In 2013 51st
Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton), pages
1037–1044. IEEE, oct 2013.
[25] W. Lin and E. Bitar. Decentralized control of distributed energy resources in radial distribution systems. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications
(SmartGridComm), pages 296–301. IEEE, nov 2016.
[26] W. Lin and E. Bitar. Performance bounds for robust decentralized control. In 2016 American
Control Conference (ACC), pages 4323–4330. IEEE, 2016.
[27] W. Lin and E. Bitar. Decentralized Stochastic Control of Distributed Energy Resources.
IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 8950(c):1–1, 2017.
[28] A. Lorca and X. A. Sun. Multistage Robust Unit Commitment with Dynamic Uncertainty
Sets and Energy Storage. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 32(3):1678–1688, 2017.
[29] Á. Lorca, X. A. Sun, E. Litvinov, and T. Zheng. Multistage Adaptive Robust Optimization
for the Unit Commitment Problem. Operations Research, 64(1):32–51, feb 2016.
[30] M. Lubin, Y. Dvorkin, and S. Backhaus. A Robust Approach to Chance Constrained
Optimal Power Flow With Renewable Generation. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems,
31(5):3840–3849, sep 2016.
26
[31] A. Mathai and S. Provost. Quadratic forms in random variables: Theory and applications.
Statistics: textbooks and monographs, Vol. 126, 1992.
[32] J. Mathias, A. Bušić, and S. Meyn. Demand Dispatch with Heterogeneous Intelligent Loads.
In 50th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Waikoloa,
HI, United States, 2017.
[33] J. Mathias, R. Kaddah, A. Bušić, and S. Meyn. Smart Fridge / Dumb Grid? Demand
Dispatch for the Power Grid of 2020. In 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on
System Sciences (HICSS), pages 2498–2507. IEEE, jan 2016.
[34] C. Matke, D. Bienstock, G. Muñoz, S. Yang, D. Kleinhans, and S. Sager. Robust optimization
of power network operation: storage devices and the role of forecast errors in renewable
energies. In H. Cherifi, S. Gaito, W. Quattrociocchi, and A. Sala, editors, Complex Networks
& Their Applications V, volume 693 of Studies in Computational Intelligence, pages 809–820.
Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2017.
[35] C. D. Meyer, Jr. Generalized Inversion of Modified Matrices. SIAM Journal on Applied
Mathematics, 24(3):315–323, may 1973.
[36] S. Meyn, P. Barooah, A. Bušić, Y. Chen, and J. Ehren. Ancillary service to the grid using
intelligent deferrable loads. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 60(11):2847–2862,
2015.
[37] S. Meyn, P. Barooah, A. Bušić, and J. Ehren. Ancillary service to the grid from deferrable
loads: The case for intelligent pool pumps in Florida. In 52nd IEEE Conference on Decision
and Control, pages 6946–6953. IEEE, dec 2013.
[38] G. Ranjan, Z.-L. Zhang, and D. Boley. Incremental Computation of Pseudo-Inverse of
Laplacian. In COCOA 2014: 8th International Conference on Combinatorial Optimization
and Applications, volume 5573, pages 729–749. Springer International Publishing, 2014.
[39] L. Roald, G. Andersson, S. Misra, M. Chertkov, and S. Backhaus. Optimal power flow
with wind power control and limited expected risk of overloads. In 2016 Power Systems
Computation Conference (PSCC), volume 60, pages 1–7. IEEE, 2016.
[40] L. Roald, S. Misra, T. Krause, and G. Andersson. Corrective Control to Handle Forecast
Uncertainty: A Chance Constrained Optimal Power Flow. IEEE Transactions on Power
Systems, 32(2):1–1, 2016.
[41] E. Sjodin, D. Gayme, and U. Topcu. Risk-mitigated optimal power flow for wind powered
grids. In 2012 American Control Conference (ACC), pages 4431–4437. IEEE, jun 2012.
[42] K. Sundar, H. Nagarajan, M. Lubin, L. Roald, S. Misra, R. Bent, and D. Bienstock. Unit
commitment with N-1 Security and wind uncertainty. In 2016 Power Systems Computation
Conference (PSCC), pages 1–7. IEEE, jun 2016.
[43] J. A. Taylor and J. L. Mathieu. Uncertainty in Demand ResponseIdentification, Estimation,
and Learning. In The Operations Research Revolution, pages 56–70. INFORMS, sep 2015.
27
[44] P. Van De Ven, N. Hegde, L. Massoulié, and T. Salonidis. Optimal control of end-user energy
storage. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 4(2):789–797, 2013.
[45] P. Van Mieghem. Graph Spectra for Complex Networks. CUP, 2011.
[46] P. Whittle. Networks: Optimisation and Evolution. Cambridge University Press, 2007.
[47] B. Zhou and N. Trinajstić. A note on Kirchhoff index. Chemical Physics Letters, 455(13):120–123, mar 2008.
[48] A. Zocca and B. Zwart. Minimizing heat loss in DC networks using batteries. In 2016 54th
Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton), pages
1306–1313. IEEE, sep 2016.
28
| 3cs.SY
|
A rational analysis of curiosity
Rachit Dubey ([email protected])
Department of Education, University of California at Berkeley, CA, USA
Thomas L. Griffiths (tom [email protected])
Department of Psychology, University of California at Berkeley, CA, USA
arXiv:1705.04351v1 [cs.AI] 11 May 2017
Abstract
We present a rational analysis of curiosity, proposing that people’s curiosity is driven by seeking stimuli that maximize their
ability to make appropriate responses in the future. This perspective offers a way to unify previous theories of curiosity
into a single framework. Experimental results confirm our
model’s predictions, showing how the relationship between curiosity and confidence can change significantly depending on
the nature of the environment.
Keywords: curiosity; rational analysis; computational model
Introduction
In 1928, upon returning from a vacation, Alexander Fleming,
who was a professor of Bacteriology at St. Mary’s Hospital
in London, noticed how a mold floating in one of his dirty
petri dishes held the surrounding bacteria at bay. This peculiar event led him to develop a hypothesis that would be
a prelude to the development of penicillin. The history of
science abounds with incidents in which an event piqued the
curiosity of a scientist thereby leading to important discoveries (other examples include Curie, Faraday, and Planck). For
this reason, intellectual curiosity has long been recognized as
the essence of science. In fact, Herbert Simon famously titled
a 1992 talk given at Carnegie Mellon as ‘The cat that curiosity couldn’t kill’ and described curiosity to be not only the
beginning of all science, but also its end (Gobet, 2016).
Considering how important curiosity is to scientific discoveries and many other aspects of cognition, it is surprising that our understanding of curiosity as a psychological
phenomenon remains quite limited (Simon, 2001; Gottlieb
et al., 2013; Kidd & Hayden 2015). Encouragingly, the field
has seen a revived interest in curiosity in recent years with
psychologists and neuroscientists beginning concentrated efforts to study curiosity systematically (Kang et al, 2009; Gruber, Gelman, & Ranganath, 2013; Law et al., 2016; Walin,
O’Grady & Xu, 2016). However, much previous work on curiosity has either focused on defining a taxonomy for curiosity
or providing a mechanistic explanation of curiosity (Kidd &
Hayden, 2015). This means that while we have made some
progress describing the psychological processes involved in
human curiosity, we have not satisfactorily provided an explanation of the purpose and function of curiosity. For example, a commonly held notion about the function of curiosity is
that it motivates learning (Loewenstein, 1994; Kidd & Hayden, 2015). Although it is easy to say that learning is the goal
of curiosity, this is not very precise in its meaning. How does
curiosity facilitate learning? Why does it do so?
In light of this, in this paper we present a rational analysis of curiosity in the spirit of Anderson (1990) and Marr
(1982) with the goal of providing a purposive explanation of
curiosity. Our work shows that a rational analysis can predict many aspects of curiosity without making assumptions
about its mechanisms. We start by defining an abstract representation of the problem that curiosity solves and making
a small number of assumptions about the nature of the environment. Following that, we explore the optimal solution to
this problem in light of these assumptions. Our theory posits
that people are curious about stimuli that maximally increase
the usefulness of their current knowledge. Depending on the
structure of the environment, the stimuli that maximize this
value can either be ones that are completely novel or that are
of intermediate complexity. As a consequence, our rational
analysis provides a way to unite previously distinct theories
of curiosity into a single framework.
The rest of the paper is structured as follows. We first review previous theories of curiosity and then introduce our rational model of curiosity. Following that, we show how our
model offers support to previous distinct accounts of curiosity thereby unifying them in a single model. We then conduct
a behavioral experiment to test our model’s predictions and
evaluate how our model accords with human curiosity. We
close with a discussion of the implications of our results.
Models of curiosity
A number of theories have been proposed in the past to describe the psychological processes involving curiosity. In this
section, we describe these theories in brief and provide their
individual strengths and weaknesses.
Curiosity based on novelty. Several psychological theories have linked curiosity with novelty by hypothesizing that
gaining information about novel stimuli is intrinsically rewarding (Berlyne, 1950; Smock & Holt, 1962). Berlyne
(1960) called this “perceptual curiosity” and described it as
a driving force that motivates an organism to seek out novel
stimuli which diminishes with an increase in exposure. This
has also been supported by some neuroscientific studies that
show that novel stimuli activate reward-responsive areas in
the brain (Ranganath and Rainer, 2003; Düzel et al., 2010).
However, a severe limitation of this theory is that it assumes
that it is optimal for an individual to explore novel stimuli in
all environments. A novel stimulus doesn’t necessarily mean
that it contains information that is useful or generalizable to
an individual. This is also pointed out by previous studies
that show that exploration based only on novelty could lead
agents to be trapped in unlearnable situations (Gottlieb et al.,
2013).
Curiosity based on information-gap. One of the most
popular theories of curiosity is the information-gap hypothesis proposed by Loewenstein (1994). According to the
information-gap hypothesis, curiosity arises whenever an individual has a gap in information prompting it to complete its
knowledge and resolve the uncertainty. Thus, curiosity peaks
when one has a small amount of knowledge but it diminishes
when one knows too little or too much about the stimuli. A
number of studies have supported this prediction and showed
that curiosity is an inverted U-shaped function of confidence,
with people showing the highest curiosity for topics that they
were moderately confident about (Kang et al., 2009; Baranes,
Oudeyer, & Gottlieb, 2015). Berlyne (1960) called this form
of curiosity “epistemic curiosity” and described it as a drive
to acquire knowledge. While this theory has considerable
strengths, it is also constrained in that an individual can only
be curious about stimuli in known contexts. Thus, if an individual has no prior knowledge about stimuli in the environment then it is not clear how curiosity will function in that
environment (as one will not be curious about any stimuli in
an environment that it has no prior knowledge of).
Curiosity based on learning progress. A third theory
concerning curiosity is guided by the hypothesis that learning progress generates intrinsic reward (Schmidhuber,1991;
Schmidhuber, 2010). This hypothesis proposes that the brain
is intrinsically motivated to pursue tasks in which one’s predictions are always improving. Thus, an individual will not
be interested in tasks that are too easy or too difficult to predict but will rather focus on tasks that are learnable. Based
on Schmidhuber’s framework, a number of papers in developmental robotics have supported this idea showing how an
agent can explore in an unknown environment (Oudeyer &
Kaplan, 2006; Oudeyer, Kaplan, & Hafner, 2007). While this
theory can probably describe some forms of curiosity, it is
again constrained in explaining curiosity in certain environments. For example, if an agent is ever present in an environment that has many difficult tasks then it is not clear how
curiosity will work (as an agent will not be curious about anything within that environment).
Summary and prospectus. While each of these theories
have their strengths, we first note that all the above theories
are concerned with describing how curiosity functions and
how it relates to different psychological factors. However,
none of these theories satisfactorily provide an explanation as
to why curiosity works the way it does. Second, we believe
that all these theories need not be in contention but are all
rather special cases of curiosity. As we will describe in the
rest of the paper, our rational model supports each of these
theories and unifies them in one common model.
Computational problem underlying curiosity
Suppose that an agent is in an environment with n stimuli,
each of which provides a reward if the appropriate response is
produced. The goal of the agent is to decide what to explore
in the environment in order to maximize its knowledge and
hence maximize rewards in the future.
The environment determines the probability with which
each stimulus occurs in the environment. Let pk denote the
“need probability” that a stimulus k will occur in the future
(Anderson, 1990). Given this, the agent assigns a confidence
value ck to each stimulus in the environment. ck denotes the
probability the agent knows the correct response to the kth
stimulus. This probability increases at a decreasing rate with
respect to the number of exposures hk with that stimulus. hk
denotes the number of times the agent has been exposed to the
kth stimulus. For convenience, we describe the relationship
between c and h by a bounded growth function,
ck = 1 − e−hk .
(1)
However, our predictions hold for any monotonically increasing function.
Next, the agent computes the value of its overall knowledge. The value, denoted as V , is a function of the need probability p and the confidence factor c and is given as follows:
V = ∑ pk .ck .
(2)
k
According to this equation, the value of an agent’s knowledge is simply the chance of successfully responding to the
next stimulus computed by summing over all stimuli in the
environment.
The goal of the agent is to increase the value of its current
knowledge V , which it can do so by taking actions to increase
h for the various stimuli in the environment. So the computational problem that the agent has to solve is choosing which
stimulus to explore further i.e. deciding which stimulus k to
increase hk for.
Deriving an optimal solution
To solve the problem of choosing which stimulus to explore
further, the agent can evaluate the change in V as it explores
each stimulus in the environment. Thus for every stimulus k
in the environment, the agent should compute the change in
its knowledge that would result from exploring that stimulus.
The stimulus that causes the largest increase in the overall
value should be explored first. This computation can be done
simply by differentiating V with respect to hk ,
Rational model of curiosity
dck
dV
= pk .
.
dhk
dhk
In this section, we detail our rational model of curiosity. We
first consider the abstract computational problem underlying
curiosity and then formally derive an optimal solution to this
problem.
An agent operating according to this model will explore
stimuli that have a high rate of change of value w.r.t exposure
dV
associated with them. This rate of change, i.e. dh
, is simply
k
the curiosity the agent has for knowing the kth item, which we
(3)
about stimuli that it is least confident about:
Ωk = 1 − ck .
(6)
According to our rational model, when the agent is in an
environment where pk and hk are independent of each other
(as described in Graph 2, Figure 1), the relationship between
curiosity and exposure will be the one described in Equation
5 where pk is simply a constant value. Thus, curiosity is highest when exposure is lowest and it decreases as exposure increases i.e. curiosity is highest for novel stimuli. The relationship between curiosity and confidence can be rewritten
as
Figure 1: Relationship between need probability pk , exposure
hk , and confidence ck in different environmental structures.
Graph 1 shows an environment in which need probability is
related to exposure and subsequently confidence. Graph 2
shows an environment in which need probability is independent of exposure and confidence.
denote as Ωk . The agent will explore stimuli in the environment that it is most curious about. In this way, curiosity helps
the agent to achieve its goal of maximizing its knowledge.
Under the choice of the form of ck given in Equation 1, we
calculate this derivative as follows:
d(1 − e−hk )
.
Ωk = pk .
dhk
(4)
Upon differentiation, we get the relationship of curiosity Ωk ,
with respect to need probability pk and exposure hk as follows:
Ωk = pk .e−hk .
(5)
Relationship to previous models
Having a formal account of curiosity, we now describe how
our model relates to previous theories of curiosity.
First, we note that in our rational model framework, two
different forms of environmental structure can exist. The first
form comes in when the agent is an environment where pk is
related to hk (as described in Graph 1, Figure 1). In this environment, stimuli frequently encountered by an agent are more
likely to be needed in the future. Thus, the probability that
the agent will require a stimulus in the future determines the
number of times the agent is exposed to the stimulus which in
turn determines the confidence of the agent in knowing that
stimulus. The second form comes in when the agent is in an
environment where pk and hk are independent of each other
(as described in Graph 2, Figure 1). In this environment, the
agent can encounter any stimulus in the future regardless of
their previous occurrence.
Novelty based curiosity. According to theories that are
based on curiosity driven by novelty, an agent is most curious
Ωk = pk .(1 − ck ).
(7)
If pk is equal for all k, this reduces to Equation 6. Thus,
when need probability and exposure are not related to each
other, our rational model is similar to the previously proposed
novelty based curiosity theory.
Information-gap hypothesis. When the agent is in an environment pk and hk are related to each other (as in Graph 1,
Figure 1), then pk is proportional to hk and the relationship
between curiosity and exposure given in Equation 5 reduces
to
Ωk ∝ hk .e−hk .
(8)
Subsequently, using Equation 1, confidence will be related to
curiosity as
Ωk ∝ − log(1 − ck ).(1 − ck ).
(9)
Interestingly, this relationship between curiosity and confidence is highly similar to the one described by the information gap hypothesis. Loewenstein used Shannon’s (1948)
entropy formula to describe the relationship between curiosity and confidence as below:
Ωk = − log(ck ).(ck ).
(10)
Both the information-gap theory and our model predict that
an inverted U-shape relationship exists between curiosity and
confidence. In this view, when an agent exists in an environment where need probability is related to exposure, our
rational model relates to the information-gap theory.
Relationship to curiosity based on learning progress.
According to the learning progress hypothesis, an agent is intrinsically motivated to pursue tasks in which predictions are
constantly improving thereby avoiding boring or extremely
complicated tasks. An agent operating under this model ends
up exploring stimuli of “intermediate complexity”.
Our model proposes that an agent will explore stimuli that
maximize the value of its current knowledge. In an environment where need probability and exposure are related to each
other, then curiosity is highest for stimulus with moderate exposure i.e. intermediate complexity (Equation 8 and 9). Thus,
Figure 2: Relationship between a) curiosity and exposure,
and b) curiosity and confidence in an environment where need
probability is related to exposure (Graph 1, Figure 1).
in this environment, an agent that aims to maximize its knowledge behaves similarly to an agent whose curiosity is driven
by learning progress.
Summary. Whereas previous theories associated curiosity to factors such as novelty, knowledge gap, and learnability,
our model shows that depending on the structure of the environment, an agent’s curiosity can be driven by any of these
factors. In this way, our rational model allows to bridge previous theories related to curiosity in a single framework. In
an environment where need probability and exposure are related, our rational model associates with the information gap
and learning progress hypothesis. In an environment where
need probability and exposure are not related, our model is
akin to the novelty-based theory of curiosity.
Empirical predictions
The rational model presented above makes two different empirical predictions.
Prediction 1. The first prediction arises when the agent is
in an environment where the relationship between pk and hk
holds true (as in Graph 1, Figure 1). The relationship between
curiosity and exposure can be described using Equation 8 and
between curiosity and confidence using Equation 9. Thus,
Equation 8 predicts that an inverted U-shape relationship will
exist between curiosity and exposure and Equation 9 similarly predicts that curiosity will be highest when the agent is
moderately confident about a stimulus (see Figure 2). We test
this prediction in the confidence sampling condition of our
behavioral experiment.
Note that this prediction fits the information gap and learning progress hypothesis which also predict an inverted Ushape curve between curiosity and confidence. While several
studies have supported the existence of this U-shaped relationship, our model also predicts how to make this effect go
away as described in our second prediction.
Prediction 2. Our second prediction comes in when the
agent is in an environment where the relationship between pk
and hk no longer holds true (as described in Graph 2, Figure
1). Then the relationship between curiosity and exposure will
be the one described in Equation 5 and the relationship between curiosity and confidence will be that given in Equation
7. Equation 5 predicts that curiosity is highest when exposure
is lowest and it decreases as exposure increases. Similarly,
Equation 7 predicts that curiosity will be highest when confidence is the lowest (also shown in Figure 3). We test this
prediction in the uniform sampling condition of the behavioral experiment.
While this prediction accords with the prediction of the
novelty based hypothesis, that hypothesis can’t explain our
model’s first prediction. On the other hand, while the information gap and learning progress hypothesis were in line with
our model’s first prediction, both of these theories fail to explain our model’s second prediction.
Testing the model predictions
This section details the behavioral experiment that was conducted in order to test our model predictions. The experiment
used two different scenarios – confidence sampling and uniform sampling – to assess whether people’s curiosity is affected by changes in the relationship between need probability and confidence. In the confidence sampling condition, we
created an environment such that need probability was related
to confidence (Graph 1, Figure 1) and in the uniform sampling
condition they were independent of each other (Graph 2, Figure 1). Based on our model predictions, we hypothesize that
an inverted U-shape relation will exist between confidence
and curiosity in the confidence condition and a decreasing relation will exist in uniform sampling condition.
Participants
We recruited 298 participants from Amazon Mechanical
Turk. They earned $1.50 for participation with the option of
earning an additional bonus of $0.80. Participants in the experiment were randomly assigned to one of two conditions:
confidence sampling condition (163 participants) and uniform sampling condition (135 participants). Informed consent was obtained using a consent form approved by the institutional review board at Berkeley.
Stimuli
Figure 3: Relationship between a) curiosity and exposure,
and b) curiosity and confidence in an environment where need
probability is independent of exposure (Graph 2, Figure 1).
The stimuli used in the experiment were 40 trivia questions on
various topics that were taken directly from Experiment 1 in
Kang et al. (2009). According to the authors, these questions
were designed to measure curiosity about semantic knowledge and evoke a range of curiosity levels.
Procedure
The experiment was divided into two phases – the main round
and bonus round. The main round was used to elicit and
measure curiosity in participants. Participants were shown 40
trivia questions one after another and were asked to rate their
confidence (i.e., probability that they know the correct answer) and curiosity in knowing the correct answer. Curiosity
ratings were on a scale from 1 to 7 and the confidence scale
ranged from 0 to 100%. Following Kang et al.’s methodology, the raw curiosity ratings were individually normalized
and confidence was rescaled to range from 0 to 1. The order
of trivia questions was randomized for each participant. Thus,
the main round of the experiment followed the procedure of
Kang et al.’s design closely. This part of the experiment took
approximately 7-8 minutes to complete.
After the main round, the bonus round began which consisted of two parts. In the first part, all 40 questions from the
main round were shown one after another and participants
could choose to reveal the answer to those questions. However, each time they chose to reveal an answer, they had to
wait an extra 10 seconds for the next question to appear. Findings from Experiment 3 of Kang et al. (2009) showed that
participants were more likely to spend time, to wait longer,
for the answers that they were more curious about. Thus,
requiring participants to spend time to obtain information
served as a proxy to measure their curiosity.
In the second part, participants attempted to answer 10
questions that were sampled from the main round ($0.08
bonus for each correct answer). To discourse participants
from using Google or other search engines, they were only
given 2 minutes in total to answer the questions.
At the beginning of the experiment, participants were randomly assigned to two conditions – the confidence and the
uniform condition. Both the conditions had the same main
round as described above but used different sampling methods for the bonus round. In the confidence condition, the sampling in bonus round was done based on the confidence ratings provided by the participants i.e. the questions for which
participant’s confidence rating was higher were more likely to
appear in the second part of the bonus round. In the uniform
condition, this sampling procedure was completely random
i.e. each question was equally likely to appear in second part
of the bonus round. Critically, participants were informed
about the sampling procedure for their respective condition
before the beginning of the bonus round. In a sense, the confidence condition creates a situation in which confidence is
related to need probability (Graph 1 in Figure 1) and the uniform condition breaks this relationship (Graph 2 in Figure 1).
According to our model’s predictions we should see an inverted U-shape between curiosity and confidence for both the
conditions in the main round. However, the curiosity of participants (i.e. the answers they revealed) should be different for both conditions in the bonus round. For the confi-
Figure 4: Relationship of curiosity and confidence in the main
round for a) confidence condition and b) uniform condition.
The markers indicate mean curiosity at each confidence level
and the solid curve is the regression line. Curiosity is an
inverted-U function of confidence for both conditions.
dence condition participants’ probability of revealing an answer should be highest for questions which they were moderately confident about. On the other hand, in the uniform condition, participants should be most curious about questions
for which they were least confident about.
Results
For all analyses that follow, we removed participants that revealed either too little (<3) or too many answers (>37) in the
bonus round. 78 participants were excluded based on this criterion and our final data consisted of 220 participants (118 in
the confidence condition and 102 in the uniform condition).
Main Round. Consistent with our prediction, an inverted
U-shape exists between curiosity and confidence for both
Figure 5: Probability of participants revealing an answer as
a function of confidence in the bonus round. Consistent with
our model’s prediction, an inverted U-shape exists between
curiosity and confidence in the confidence condition and a
decreasing relationship exists in the uniform condition.
conditions (Figure 4). Following the method of Kang et al.,
we fitted curiosity with confidence and uncertainty i.e. confidence × (1-confidence) for both conditions. For the confidence condition, the model provided r = 0.2 and a significant coefficient for uncertainty (estimate = 2.01, p < 0.001).
For the uniform condition, the model provided similar results
with r = 0.2 and significant coefficient for uncertainty (estimate = 2.12, p < 0.001). Thus, for both conditions, the model
provided a significant quadratic coefficient thereby demonstrating the prevalence of an inverted U-shape between curiosity and confidence for both conditions.
Bonus Round. We first computed the probability of participants revealing an answer conditioned on the confidence
rating for both the conditions. As per our model’s predictions,
an inverted U-shape exists for the confidence condition and a
decreasing relationship exists for the uniform condition (Figure 5). Similar to the previous analysis, we fitted confidence
and uncertainty to both the conditions. For the confidence
condition, the model provided r = 0.9 and a significant coefficient for both confidence and uncertainty (estimates = -0.15
and 0.53 respectively with p < 0.05 for both) thereby showing a U-shape relationship. For the uniform condition, the
model provided r = 0.91 but the coefficient for uncertainty
was not significant (p = 0.09). On the other hand, the coefficient for confidence was significant (estimate = -0.23, p <
0.001), implying a decreasing relationship of curiosity with
confidence for the uniform condition.
Discussion
Curiosity is one of the hallmarks of human intelligence and
is crucial to scientific discovery and invention. Models
of curiosity have previously explained human curiosity by
linking it to various psychological factors such as novelty,
information-gap, and learning progress. We have shown that
these different models are all special cases of curiosity — depending on the environment, curiosity can be driven by any of
these factors. Along with providing a way to unify previous
distinct mechanistic accounts of curiosity, our rational model
explains human curiosity in various settings.
Our results suggest that human curiosity is not only sensitive to the properties of the stimuli but it is also affected by
the nature of the environment. If people are in an environment where need probability influences exposure, then their
curiosity is highest for stimuli for which they are moderately
confident about. On the other hand, if need probability and
exposure are independent of each other then curiosity is highest for novel stimuli, i.e. stimuli for which people have little
confidence. This can have important implications in the context of education where researchers are concerned with ways
to pique curiosity in students. If we want to make people curious about tasks or activities for which they have little confidence in, perhaps subtle changes in the structure of the environment might be a step towards achieving that. We intend
to explore such possibilities in future work, building upon the
foundation established in this paper and working towards a
better understanding of how to make people more curious especially in pedagogical settings.
References
Anderson, J. R. (1990). The adaptive character of thought. Psychology Press.
Baranes, A., Oudeyer, P.-Y., & Gottlieb, J. (2015). Eye movements
reveal epistemic curiosity in human observers. Vision research,
117, 81–90.
Berlyne, D. E. (1950). Novelty and curiosity as determinants of
exploratory behaviour1. British Journal of Psychology. General
Section, 41(1-2), 68–80.
Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity.
Düzel, E., Bunzeck, N., Guitart-Masip, M., & Düzel, S. (2010).
Novelty-related motivation of anticipation and exploration by
dopamine (nomad): implications for healthy aging. Neuroscience
& Biobehavioral Reviews, 34(5), 660–669.
Gobet, F. (2016). From bounded rationality to expertise. In Minds,
models and milieux (pp. 151–166). Springer.
Gottlieb, J., Oudeyer, P.-Y., Lopes, M., & Baranes, A. (2013).
Information-seeking, curiosity, and attention: computational and
neural mechanisms. Trends in cognitive sciences, 17(11), 585–
593.
Gruber, M. J., Gelman, B. D., & Ranganath, C. (2014). States
of curiosity modulate hippocampus-dependent learning via the
dopaminergic circuit. Neuron, 84(2), 486–496.
Kang, M. J., Hsu, M., Krajbich, I. M., Loewenstein, G., McClure,
S. M., Wang, J. T. Y., & Camerer, C. F. (2009). The wick in the
candle of learning: Epistemic curiosity activates reward circuitry
and enhances memory. Psychological Science, 20(8), 963–973.
Kidd, C., & Hayden, B. Y. (2015). The psychology and neuroscience
of curiosity. Neuron, 88(3), 449–460.
Law, E., Yin, M., Goh, J., Chen, K., Terry, M. A., & Gajos, K. Z.
(2016). Curiosity killed the cat, but makes crowdwork better. In
Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in
Computing Systems (pp. 4098–4110).
Loewenstein, G. (1994). The psychology of curiosity: A review and
reinterpretation. Psychological bulletin, 116(1), 75.
Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A computational approach.
Oudeyer, P.-Y., & Kaplan, F. (2006). Discovering communication.
Connection Science, 18(2), 189–206.
Oudeyer, P.-Y., Kaplan, F., & Hafner, V. V. (2007). Intrinsic motivation systems for autonomous mental development. IEEE transactions on evolutionary computation, 11(2), 265–286.
Ranganath, C., & Rainer, G. (2003). Neural mechanisms for detecting and remembering novel events. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(3), 193–202.
Schmidhuber, J. (1991). Curious model-building control systems. In
IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 1991.
(pp. 1458–1463).
Schmidhuber, J. (2010). Formal theory of creativity, fun, and intrinsic motivation (1990–2010). IEEE Transactions on Autonomous
Mental Development, 2(3), 230–247.
Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication.
Bell System Technical Journal, 27(4), 623–656.
Simon, H. A. (2001). Seek and ye shall find: How curiosity engenders discovery. Designing for science: Implications from everyday, classroom, and professional settings, 5–20.
Smock, C. D., & Holt, B. G. (1962). Children’s reactions to novelty:
An experimental study of “curiosity motivation”. Child Development, 631–642.
Walin, H., ’Grady, S. O., & Xu, F. (2016). Curiosity and its influence on children’s memory. In Proceedings of the 38th Annual
Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
| 2cs.AI
|
A Multi-Swarm Cellular PSO based on Clonal
Selection Algorithm in Dynamic Environments
Somayeh Nabizadeh
Alireza Rezvanian
Mohammd Reza Meybodi
Computer & IT Engineering Department
Islamic Azad University, Qazvin Branch
Qazvin, Iran
[email protected]
Computer & IT Engineering Department
Amirkabir University of Technology
Tehran, Iran
[email protected]
Computer & IT Engineering Department
Amirkabir University of Technology
Tehran, Iran
[email protected]
Abstract— Many real-world problems are dynamic optimization
problems. In this case, the optima in the environment change
dynamically. Therefore, traditional optimization algorithms
disable to track and find optima. In this paper, a new multiswarm cellular particle swarm optimization based on clonal
selection algorithm (CPSOC) is proposed for dynamic
environments. In the proposed algorithm, the search space is
partitioned into cells by a cellular automaton. Clustered particles
in each cell, which make a sub-swarm, are evolved by the particle
swarm optimization and clonal selection algorithm. Experimental
results on Moving Peaks Benchmark demonstrate the superiority
of the CPSOC its popular methods.
Keywords- dynamic environment; multi swarm cellular pso;
cellular automata; clonal selection algorithm.
system [9-10] and ant colony optimization were presented for
solving dynamic optimization problems.
In this paper, due to diversity maintenance and speeding
up, the hybrid algorithm based on multi-swarm cellular PSO
and clonal selection algorithm is proposed. In the proposed
algorithm, a simple clustering is used to form sub-population
in each cell and clonal selection algorithm is applied for each
swarm in each cell to improve solutions.
The rest of this paper is organized as follows: section II
briefly introduced the cellular PSO. The proposed algorithm is
described in section III. Experimental results of proposed
algorithm on Moving Peaks Benchmark as a popular dynamic
environment with comparison with alternative algorithms are
reported in section IV. Finally, section 5 concludes the paper.
II.
I.
INTRODUCTION
In the real-world problems, many of optimization problems
are modeled as dynamic optimization problems, which optima
change whole the time. The traditional optimization
algorithms are failed in the dynamic environments, because
the traditional algorithms cannot track the changes in the
environments [1]. Several approaches such as maintenance
diversity methods, increase diversity methods, memory-based
methods and multi-swarm methods are developed for solving
dynamic optimization problems [2].
One of the successful algorithms in dynamic environments
is particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm [3] with
several developments. In [4], the parents maintain diversity
and identify the promising regions while the offspring search
local areas to find local extrema by multi-swarm algorithm.
Cellular PSO is proposed by Hashemi et al [5-6] based on
PSO and cellular automata. In cellular PSO, the search space
is partitioned into cells. Individual in each cells make a subpopulation, are evolved by PSO.
Moreover, Evolutionary algorithms such as genetic
algorithm [7], differential evolution [8], artificial immune
CELLULAR PSO
The original PSO introduced in 1995, is based on swarm
behavior by Kennedy and Eberhart. In PSO, each solution is
considered as a particle which represents a single bird in a
swarm. Initially, the particles are created and positioned
randomly in the search space. Then, each particle is updated
iteratively according to the best personal and global fitness
observed value to reach optimal fitness [11].
In Cellular PSO, the search space is partitioned by a
cellular automaton (CA). Particles in each cell in the CA
searches and control its corresponding region according to
some transmission state rules of CA. Each particle is assigned
to a cell based on its position in the space and the search
procedure is performed separately for each cell and its
neighbors by using the PSO. This search method provides
enough diversity and provides the ability of following multiple
optimum solutions. In addition, neighboring cells
communicate information about their best known solutions
which results in a more appropriate cooperation between
neighboring cells sharing their experiences. This in turn
increases the efficiency of the algorithm [6].
At each iteration in the algorithm, the velocity and position
of the particles are updated according to the following
equations:
(1)
v i (t 1) wv i (t ) c1 r1 ( pBest i pi (t ))
c 2 r2 (lBestMem k
pi (t ))
(2)
pi t 1
pi t
vi t
i 1, ..., m
Where vi is the velocity of the ith particle and pi is its
position, while r1 and r2 are uniformly distributed random
variables in (0,1). c1 and c2 are the learning parameters which
are often considered to be equal. w is the inertia weight which
may be constant or variable. pBesti is the best known solution
for the ith particle and lBestMemk is the best known solution of
kth cell neighbor to which particle i belongs.
Kamosi et al. proposed a multi-swarm algorithm for dynamic
environments, which address the diversity loss problem by
introducing two types of swarm: a parent swarm, which
explores the search space to find promising area containing
local optima and several non-overlapping child swarms, each
of which is responsible for exploiting a promising area found
by the parent swarm [12].
The main drawback of cellular PSO is that the number of
cells exponentially increases as the dimension of the problem
and/or the number of partitions increase. Moreover, it is not
possible to change the number of cells during runtime. To
overcome the problem of fixed number of cells, clustering is
used to dynamically create swarms in each cell. Due to
clustering technique, it is not necessary to increase the number
of cells in order to obtain a more precise search and therefore,
the exponential increase in the number of cells is prevented.
Moreover, clonal selection algorithm is applied for solution
improvement.
The general procedure of CSA is defined as follows:
Clonal Selection Algorithm (CSA)
1. Initialize population of antibodies randomly.
2. Repeat steps 3-6 until stopping conditions is met
3. Evaluate the antibodies and calculate their affinity
4. Select a number of the highest affinity antibodies of N and
cloning these antibodies with respect their affinities
5. Mutate all the colonies with a rate proportional to their affinities
6. Add the mutated antibodies to the population and reselect a
number of the maturated antibodies as memory
It is note that, several versions of CSA are developed by
researchers in the literature, although it is used standard CSA in
the proposed algorithm.
IV.
PROPOSED ALGORITHM
In cellular PSO, a CA is used for solution space
partitioning. CA technique is known as a mathematical model
of systems with several simple components which have local
communications. Using CA and the local rules, an ordered
structure may be obtained from a completely random state.
Two well-known neighborhood structures of Von Neumann
and Moore in CA are shown in figure 1.
(a)
III. CLONAL SELECTION ALGORITHM
Artificial immune system algorithms are bio-inspired
algorithms which have been inspired by natural immune
system. Natural immune system is divided into innate immune
and adaptive immune, the algorithms are proposed by
researchers, which are modeled based on the latter. Moreover,
based on several theories for natural immune system, the
inspired models are developed into five groups: (1) negative
selection algorithms, (2) Artificial immune network, (3) clonal
selection algorithms, (4) Danger Theory inspired algorithms,
(5) Dendritic cell algorithms [13-14].
Clonal selection algorithm (CSA) is one of the artificial
immune system algorithms, which is inspired from natural
immune system mechanisms. Clonal selection was proposed by
de Castro for learning and optimization [15]. The main features
of CSA were considered such as affinity proportional
reproduction and hypermutation.
(b)
Figure 1. 2-D Neighborhood structure in CA; (a) Moore; (b) Von Neumann
In our proposed method, generally, after partitioning the
space into cells, a simple clustering is applied on particles to
make swarms in each cell. In during the cellular PSO, clonal
selection is used to improve the solutions. In the proposed
algorithm, the position and the velocity of the particles are
updated according to equation (3) and equation (2).
v i (t 1) wv i (t ) c1r1 ( pBest i
(3)
x i (t ))
c 2r2 (sBestMem k x i (t ))
Where sBestMemk , is the best position in group k, is used
as dynamic memory of the group to which particle i belongs.
In addition, best particles in each group are updated by using
the following equation.
k
(4)
v (t 1) c r ( pBest x (t )) c r (cBestMem x (t ))
i
1 1
i
2 2
i
k
k
i
k
c3r3 (x i (t ) sBestMeml ) wv i (t )
Where sBestMemlk, the best position in dynamic memory of
the cell to which the group belongs and sBestMemlk is the best
position in other groups in the cell. As an example, if the best
particle in group j of cell k is updated, sBestMemlk is the best
position among all the groups in cell k except group j. The
forth part of the Equation prevents the groups from converging
to a local extrema.
In the proposed algorithm, after each change clonal
selection which increases the efficiency of the algorithm is
performed for each swarm. The CSA is applied to the CBest
of each cell. The overall process includes definition of a
magnitude and a direction of movement for each dimension
determining the magnitude and direction of the search in that
dimension. Moving in each dimension according to the
specified magnitude and direction, the fitness is calculated for
the obtained position and if improved, the current position is
substituted by the obtained one and if not, the movement
direction is reversed in that dimension and a new direction is
followed. If the fitness is improved performing the latter
action, the update is performed and if not, the magnitude of
movement is decreased and the process begins for the next
dimension. The whole procedure is performed for all
dimensions until in a movement further improvement is
impossible in all dimensions and the minimum movement
magnitude is reached in all dimensions.
The flow chart of proposed algorithm is illustrated as figure 2.
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
60
70
80
90
100
(a)
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
(b)
Figure 3.
(a) Particles in the partitioned search space (b) new position of the
particles in the search space after some iterations.
V.
EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
In order to evaluate the proposed algorithm in dynamic
environments, several experiments are performed on Moving
Peaks Benchmark (MPB). In the MPB, there are some peaks
in a multi-dimensional space, where the height, width, and
position of each peak alter when the environment changes.
Unless stated otherwise, the parameters of the MPB are set to
the values presented in table 1 [12,16-17].
TABLE I.
Figure 2.
Flow chart of proposed method
In the algorithm, when particles in a swarm converge to a
position, the swarm becomes inactive and its particles are used
as free particles in finding better solutions in other swarms of
the cell or in the neighbor cells. Figure 3 depict the running of
the algorithm of particles in a 2-D search space.
DEFAULT SETTINGS OF MPB
Parameter
number of peaks m
Frequency of change f
height severity
width severity
peak shape
shift length s
number of dimensions D
cone height range H
cone width range W
cone standard height I
Search space range A
Value
10
every 5000 evaluations
7.0
1.0
Cone
1.0
5
[30.0, 70.0]
[1, 12]
50.0
[0, 100]
TABLE IV.
In order to compare the proposed method with other
algorithms, the offline error (OE), provided by the equation
below, is used.
1 T
OE
f ( pbest (t )
(5)
T t 1
Where f is the fitness function, T is the maximum number
of iterations and pBest(t) is the best known global solution
found by the algorithm in iteration t.
For the proposed method the inertia weight is considered as
a random variable between 0.4 and 0.9. The acceleration
coefficient is set to 1.496180, the number of particles is 40;
the type of neighborhood structure is Moore and the size of
partition is 5.
In the experiments, proposed algorithm so called Cellular
PSObased on Clonal Selection as CPSOC is compared with
Hibernating Multi Swarm Optimization as HmSO [17],
Learning Automata based Immune Algorithm as LAIA [9],
Cellular Differential Evolution as CDE [8], Cellular Particle
Swarm Optimization as CPSO [6], and Adaptive Particle
Swarm Optimization as APSO [16] by offline error. For each
experiment, the average offline error and standard deviation of
30 times independent running is reported. The results of
several dynamics are listed in the table II, to table V.
TABLE II.
M
HmSO
LAIA
CDE
CPSO
APSO
CPSOC
8.53±0.49 7.34±0.32 8.20±0.19
7.81±0.51
4.81±0.14 8.29±0.55
5
7.40±0.31 7.05±0.39 6.06±0.05
6.59±0.31
4.95±0.11 6.29±0.21
10
7.56±0.27 6.91±0.32 5.93±0.04
7.35±0.22
5.16±0.11 5.45±0.17
20
7.81±0.20 6.95±0.38 5.60±0.03
7.79±0.27 5.81±0.08 5.47±0.19
30
8.33±0.18 6.92±0.33 5.56±0.03
7.88±0.23
6.03±0.07 5.59±0.12
40
8.45±0.18 6.84±0.31 5.47±0.02
7.83±0.21
6.10±0.08 5.63±0.16
50
8.83±0.17 6.43±0.29 5.47±0.02
8.12±0.22
5.95±0.06 5.74±0.11
100 8.85±0.16 6.58±0.26 5.29±0.02
7.90±0.24
6.08±0.06 5.45±0.07
200 8.85±0.16 6.41±0.27 5.07±0.02
7.82±0.20
6.20±0.04 5.79±0.10
M
HmSO
HmSO
LAIA
CDE
CPSO
APSO
CPSOC
1
1.75±0.10 2.48±0.15 2.38±0.78
3.78±0.25 1.06±0.03 2.31±0.21
5
1.92±0.11 2.51±0.19 2.12±0.02
2.91±0.14 1.55±0.05 2.01±0.13
10
2.39±0.16 2.82±0.27 2.42±0.02
3.18±0.16 2.17±0.07 1.56±0.15
20
2.46±0.09 3.16±0.36 3.05±0.04
3.65±0.13 2.51±0.05 2.41±0.13
30
2.57±0.05 3.14±0.33 3.29±0.03
3.90±0.11 2.61±0.02 2.78±0.10
40
2.56±0.06 3.02±0.31 3.43±0.03
4.20±0.13 2.59±0.03 2.90±0.12
50
2.65±0.05 3.05±0.31 3.44±0.02
4.08±0.11 2.66±0.02 3.18±0.09
100 2.72±0.04 3.14±0.35 3.36±0.01
4.23±0.09 2.62±0.02 3.22±0.07
200 2.81±0.04 3.08±0.32 3.13±0.01
4.09±0.10 2.64±0.01 3.09±0.12
TABLE V.
M
HmSO
OFFLINE ERROR ±STANDARD ERROR FOR F =5000
LAIA
CDE
CPSO
APSO
CPSOC
1
0.87±0.05 1.94±0.19 1.53±0.07
2.36±0.14 0.53±0.01 1.02±0.14
5
1.18±0.04 2.09±0.18 1.50±0.04
1.94±0.16 1.05±0.06 0.99±0.15
10
1.42±0.04 2.14±0.15 1.64±0.03
2.09±0.13 1.31±0.03 1.75±0.10
20
1.50±0.06 2.97±0.21 2.64±0.05
2.94±0.13 1.69±0.05 1.93±0.11
30
1.65±0.04 2.98±0.23 2.62±0.05
3.04±0.09 1.78±0.02 2.28±0.10
40
1.65±0.05 3.07±0.29 2.76±0.05
3.16±0.11 1.86±0.02 2.62±0.09
50
1.66±0.02 2.93±0.27 2.75±0.05
3.19±0.10 1.95±0.02 2.74±0.10
100 1.68±0.03 3.06±0.24 2.73±0.03
3.24±0.09 1.95±0.01 2.84±0.12
200 1.71±0.02 2.95±0.23 2.61±0.02
3.15±0.08 1.90±0.01 2.69±0.08
OFFLINE ERROR ±STANDARD ERROR FOR F =500
1
TABLE III.
M
OFFLINE ERROR ±STANDARD ERROR FOR F =2500
OFFLINE ERROR ±STANDARD ERROR FOR F =1000
LAIA
CDE
CPSO
APSO
CPSOC
1
4.46±0.26 4.96±0.32 4.98±0.35
5.86±0.42 2.72±0.04 4.74±0.32
5
4.27±0.08 4.01±0.31 3.96±0.04
5.26±0.26 2.99±0.09 3.95±0.21
10
4.61±0.07 3.94±0.29 3.98±0.03
5.75±0.23 3.87±0.08 3.20±0.20
20
4.66±0.12 3.72±0.29 4.53±0.02
5.74±0.19 4.13±0.06 3.52±0.17
30
4.83±0.09 4.03±0.31 4.77±0.02
5.84±0.16 4.12±0.04 3.96±0.12
40
4.82±0.09 3.97±0.32 4.87±0.02
5.84±0.17 4.15±0.04 4.21±0.17
50
4.96±0.03 4.22±0.31 4.87±0.02 5.84±0.14. 4.11±0.03 3.98±0.11.
100 5.14±0.08 4.19±0.32 4.85±0.02
5.73±0.11 4.26±0.04 4.13±0.12
200 5.25±0.08 4.38±0.31 4.46±0.01
5.48±0.11 4.21±0.02 4.15±0.01
According to the results of the table II to table V, the
proposed algorithm is better than alternative algorithms
relatively.
VI. CONCLUSION
In this paper, an improving cellular PSO algorithm
proposed by clonal selection algorithm in dynamic
environment. The proposed algorithm, speed up the clellular
PSO algorithm by clustering and improve the quality of
solutions by clonal selection algorithm. Moreover in the
proposed algorithm, it is applied precise search without
increasing the number of partitions. The experimental results
on the moving peaks benchmark as a popular dynamic
environment with comparison with state of the art algorithms
shows the relative improvements for our suggestions.
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
C. Cruz, J. R. González, and D. A. Pelta, “Optimization in dynamic
environments: a survey on problems, methods and measures,” Soft
Computing, vol. 15, no.7, pp. 1427-1448, 2010.
D. Ayvaz, H. R. Topcuoglu, and F. Gurgen, “Performance evaluation of
evolutionary heuristics in dynamic environments,” Applied Intelligence,
pp. 1–15, 2011.
S. Nabizadeh, K. Faez, S. Tavassoli, and A. Rezvanian, “A novel
method for multi-level image thresholding using particle swarm
Optimization algorithms,” in 2010 2nd International Conference on
Computer Engineering and Technology (ICCET), 2010, vol. 4, pp. V271-V275.
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
R. I. Lung and D. Dumitrescu, “A collaborative model for tracking
optima in dynamic environments,” in Evolutionary Computation, 2007.
CEC 2007. IEEE Congress on, 2007, pp. 564-567.
A. B. Hashemi and M. Meybodi, “A multi-role cellular PSO for dynamic
environments,” in 14th International CSI Computer Conference
(CSICC), 2009, pp. 412-417.
A. Hashemi and M. Meybodi, “Cellular PSO: A PSO for dynamic
environments,” Advances in Computation and Intelligence, Lecture
Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5821, pp. 422-433, 2009.
H. Wang, S. Yang, W. Ip, and D. Wang, “Adaptive Primal–Dual Genetic
Algorithms in Dynamic Environments,” Systems, Man, and Cybernetics,
Part B: Cybernetics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 13481361, 2009.
V. Noroozi, A. Hashemi, and M. Meybodi, “CellularDE: a cellular based
differential evolution for dynamic optimization problems,” Adaptive and
Natural Computing Algorithms, Lecture Notes in Computer Science,
vol. 6593, pp. 340-349, 2011.
A. Rezvanian and M. R. Meybodi, “An adaptive mutation operator for
artificial immune network using learning automata in dynamic
environments,” in 2010 Second World Congress on Nature and
Biologically Inspired Computing (NaBIC), 2010, pp. 479-483.
A. Rezvanian and M. R. Meybodi, “Tracking Extrema in Dynamic
Environments Using a Learning Automata-Based Immune Algorithm,”
Grid and Distributed Computing, Control and Automation, vol. 121, pp.
216-225, 2010.
A. Hashemi and M. Meybodi, “A note on the learning automata based
algorithms for adaptive parameter selection in PSO,” Applied Soft
Computing, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 689-705, 2011.
M. Kamosi, A. B. Hashemi, M. R. Meybodi, "A New Particle Swarm
Optimization Algorithm for Dynamic Environments", Swarm,
Evolutionary, And Memetic Computing, Lecture Notes in Computer
Science, 2010, vol. 6466, pp. 129-138,
A. Rezvanian and M. R. Meybodi, “LACAIS: Learning Automata based
Cooperative Artificial Immune System for Function Optimization,” in
3rd International Conference on Contemporary Computing (IC3 2010),
Noida, India. Contemporary Computing, CCIS, 2010, vol. 94, pp. 64-75.
D. Dasgupta, S. Yu, F. Nino, “Recent Advances in Artificial Immune
Systems: Models and Applications”, Applied Soft Computing, vol. 11,
no. 2, pp. 1574-1587, 2011.
L.N. De Castro, F. J.Von Zuben, F.J., “Learning and optimization using
the clonal selection principle”, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary
Computation, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 239-251, 2002.
I. Rezazadeh, M. R. Meybodi, A. Naebi, “Adaptive Particle Swarm
Optimization Algorithm for Dynamic Environments”, Advances In
Swarm Intelligence, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2011, vol.
6728, pp. 120-129.
M. Kamosi, A. B. Hashemi, M. R. Meybodi, “A hibernating multiswarm optimization algorithm for dynamic environments”, in 2010
Second World Congress on Nature and Biologically Inspired Computing
(NaBIC), 2010, pp. 363-369.
| 9cs.NE
|
JOURNAL OF LATEX CLASS FILES, VOL. 13, NO. 9, SEPTEMBER 2014
1
From State Estimation to Network Reconstruction
arXiv:1701.09084v1 [cs.SY] 28 Jan 2017
Farnaz Basiri, Jose Casadiego, Marc Timme, Dirk Witthaut
Abstract—We develop methods to efficiently reconstruct the
topology and line parameters of a power grid from the measurement of nodal variables. We propose two compressed sensing
algorithms that minimize the amount of necessary measurement
resources by exploiting network sparsity, symmetry of connections and potential prior knowledge about the connectivity. The
algorithms are reciprocal to established state estimation methods,
where nodal variables are estimated from few measurements
given the network structure. Hence, they enable an advanced
grid monitoring where both state and structure of a grid are
subject to uncertainties or missing information.
Index Terms—State estimation, Power system control, SCADA
systems, Compressed sensing
I. I NTRODUCTION
The secure and reliable operation of complex power grids
requires a precise knowledge of the grid topology and the state
of connected generation and transmission elements. A central
tool is ‘state estimation’, i.e the estimation of the current
state of the nodes from few, possibly noisy measurements
and the grid data. Various methods and algorithms have been
developed in this field, see e.g. [1] for a review. A prime
example is the estimation of the voltage phase angles from
power flow measurements (see e.g. [2] for basic textbook
examples). State estimation algorithms typically assume that
the network structure, i.e. the location and parameters of
transmission lines and transformers, are known. However,
parts of the information might be lacking or uncertain, for
example for contingencies or attacks, such that the question
arises: Is it possible to reconstruct the network structure from
local measurements only?
In this article we develop two algorithms that enable the
faithful reconstruction of the network structure or parts of it
from the measurement of nodal variables. Special attention
is paid to the efficiency of these methods: We show how
to reduce the number of measurements using methods from
compressed sensing exploiting the structural properties of
power grids. We here focus on the DC approximation to
formulate the fundamental ideas of network reconstruction
most clearly.
The presented algorithms can find several applications in
the monitoring and operation of (smart) power grids. While
it is unlikely that the entire network structure is unknown,
situations regularly occur where parts of the information
F. Basiri is with the Forschungszentrum Jülich, Institute for Energy and
Climate Research - Systems Analysis and Technology Evaluation (IEK-STE),
52428 Jülich.
J. Casadiego and M. Timme are with the Max Planck Institute for Dynamics
and Self-Organization (MPIDS), 37077 Göttingen, Germany.
D. Witthaut is with the Forschungszentrum Jülich, Institute for Energy and
Climate Research - Systems Analysis and Technology Evaluation (IEK-STE),
52428 Jülich, Germany and the Institute for Theoretical Physics, University
of Cologne, 50937 Köln, Germany.
is lacking. Manual switches still exist in many distribution
grids, transmission lines can get lost in contingency cases and
targeted attacks can cause entire regions of a grid to collapse.
We present an example where the connectivity in two regions
of the grid is a priori unknown, but can be reconstructed from
a single snapshot of the nodal variables. In future power grids,
the network’s structure will become even more variable: The
transmission of high-voltage direct current (HVDC) lines in
hybrid power grids can be actively controlled and the effective
line parameters can be regulated with flexible alternating current transmission system (FACTS) devices. Then it becomes
essential to include lacking information or uncertainties of
the grid topologies in any grid monitoring tool. The methods
presented in this article shall contribute to the development of
such advanced monitoring algorithms [3]–[5].
II. T HE DC APPROXIMATION
The DC approximation describes the flow of real power
flow in AC power grids in a linearized way. It is derived
from the full nonlinear load flow equations under the following
additional simplifying assumptions [2], [6]–[8]:
• All bus voltage magnitudes |Vs | are close to 1 p.u. and
approximated to be exactly |Vs | = 1 p.u.
• Voltage angle differences across branches are small, such
that sin(ϕs − ϕr ) ≈ ϕs − ϕr and cos(ϕs − ϕr ) ≈ 1.
• Branches can be considered lossless. In particular, branch
resistances and charging capacitances are negligible.
The approximate real power flow from node s to node r over
a transmission line with reactance Xsr is then given by
|Vs ||Vr |
−1
sin(ϕs − ϕr ) ≈ Xsr
(ϕs − ϕr )
(1)
Xsr
where ϕs is the phase angle at bus s. The real power balance
at the node s reads
N
N
X
X
−1
Ps =
Psr =
Xsr
(ϕs − ϕr ).
(2)
Psr =
r=1
r=1
For notational convenience we summarize these equations
in matrix form. We define the vector of all voltage angles and
power injections,
ϕ = (ϕ1 , . . . , ϕN )T ∈ RN , P
= (P1 , . . . , PN )T ∈ RN ,
where N is the number of buses or nodes in the grid and the
superscript ‘T ’ denotes the transpose of a vector or matrix.
The DC approximation then yields the condition
Bϕ = P ,
(3)
N ×N
where the nodal susceptance matrix B ∈ R
has elements
X
N
X −1 if k = n;
j=1 nj
Bnk =
(4)
−X −1
if k 6= n.
nk
JOURNAL OF LATEX CLASS FILES, VOL. 13, NO. 9, SEPTEMBER 2014
2
The matrix B is a Laplacian matrix, which has one zero eigenvalue with eigenvector (1, 1, . . . , 1)T [9]. This eigenvector
represents a global shift of all voltage angles without physical
significance. To avoid this complication, one often fixes the
voltage angle at a reference bus and excludes this bus from
the calculation, i.e. the corresponding row and column will be
missing in B. We finally note that mathematically equivalent
models of flow are used to describe hydraulic networks [10]
or vascular networks of plants [11].
III. S TATE E STIMATION
State estimation is a mathematical procedure by which the
state of an electric power system is extracted from a set
of measurements [1]. In general, any measurement can be
expressed as a function of the system state. Let
zi = hi (x)
(5)
denote a measured quantity, where x is the system state and
hi is a function specific to the measured quantity zi . Assume
that M measurements are taken. Then, all measurements can
be written in compact form
z = h(x)
(6)
where
x ∈ RN ×1 is the system state,
z ∈ RM ×1 is a vector of measured quantities and
h is a vector function, i.e. a mapping RN → RM
Typically more measurements than the number of state variables to be determined are taken, i.e. M > N , such that
equation (6) is overdetermined. It is then solved in a leastsquares fashion, i.e. one calculates x such that kz − h(x)k22 is
minimized. For underdetermined equations (6) typically many
solutions exist.
It is often helpful to work with a simplified DC approximation model for the measurement equations in analyzing
the inherent limitations of various methods related solely to
the measurement configuration [12]. The state of the grid is
described by the voltage phase angles x = ϕ and shall be
estimated from measurements. As explicated above, the real
power flow measured from bus s to r can be approximated by
−1
Psr = Xsr
(ϕs − ϕr ) + esr
N
X
Psr + e0s
Let us come back to the defining equation for the DC
approximation
Bϕ = P .
(9)
In state estimation, we assume that the nodal phase angles
ϕ are difficult to measure and shall be estimated from the
knowledge of the two other quantities in this equation, B
and P . But we can also reverse the problem and ask what
happens if we don’t know the nodal susceptance matrix B.
Can we efficiently reconstruct its entries from measurements
of the two remaining quantities P and ϕ? This problem may
appear hypothetical at a first glance, as the network structure
and parameters are generally known. But there are situations
where at least parts of the network structure are unknown:
Switches can be open or closed, transmission lines can undergo
failures, or plans may be inaccurate. Even more, in times
of war or terrorism we may be extremely unsure about the
physical integrity of parts of the grid. Can we reconstruct the
structure of the grid from measurements only?
In the following we develop a mathematical theory of
network reconstruction. To introduce the method, we start
from the hypothetical situation that B is completely unknown,
whereas P and ϕ can be measured perfectly. We then study
more realistic cases, where only parts of the grid topology are
unknown.
We first notice that a single measurement of P and ϕ will
obviously not be enough to reconstruct the entire grid topology. However, we may repeat our measurement at different
times t1 , t2 , . . . , tM such that we obtain a large number of
conditions on the entries of B of the form
X
Brk ϕk (tm ) = Pr (tm )
(10)
k
which hold for all rows r = 1, . . . , N and all measurement
time steps m = 1, . . . , M . Furthermore we know that the rowsums of the nodal susceptance matrix (4) vanish,
X
Brk = 0.
(11)
k
In total we thus have N × (M + 1) conditions which we can
use to reconstruct the unknown entries of B.
A. Row-wise reconstruction
(7)
where ϕs is the phase angle at bus s and esr is a measurement
error. Similarly, a power injection measurement
Ps =
IV. N ETWORK R ECONSTRUCTION
(8)
r=1
at a given bus s can be expressed as a sum of flows along
incident branches to that bus. The measurement vector z
thus consists of a subset of the power flows Psr and power
injections Ps . In the DC approximation the vector function
h are all linear, which strongly simplifies the problem such
that it is especially suitable to introduce new concepts such as
network reconstruction.
In a first approach we aim to reconstruct the nodal admittance matrix row-by-row (cf. [13]–[16]). To simplify notation
we collect all measurement conditions (10) and the condition
(11) for a given row r and rewrite them in matrix form
Pr (t1 )
ϕ1 (t1 ) · · · ϕN (t1 )
B
r1
.
..
..
.
.. ..
.
(12)
. =
Pr (tM )
ϕ1 (tM ) · · · ϕN (tM )
BrN
0
1
···
1
| {z }
|
{z
} =:B r
{z
}
|
=:Φ
N ×1
=:P r
Here, B r ∈ R
denotes the transpose of the rth row of the
nodal admittance matrix B, which we want to reconstruct. The
matrix Φ ∈ R(M +1)×N summarizes all measurement results
JOURNAL OF LATEX CLASS FILES, VOL. 13, NO. 9, SEPTEMBER 2014
3
for the voltage phase angles at all time steps, while the vector
P r ∈ R(M +1)×1 summarizes the values of the power injection
only for node r. The last row of the matrix equation represents
the condition (11) for the row sum.
Now we have to distinguish, whether equation (12) is
(over)determined or underdetermined. If the number of linearly independent equations is larger or equal to N we
generally have enough information to directly compute B r .
In particular there is exactly one solution if rank(Φ̄|P¯r ) =
rank(Φ̄) = N , which can be calculated using Gaussian
elimination. Nevertheless, matrix inversion can be numerically
ill-conditioned, especially for systems with large N [17].
If the data includes some measurement noise, the system
of equations (12) can be overdetermined when measuring
M + 1 > N times such that it is solvable in a least squares
fashion, i.e. we have to determine the vector B r ∈ RN ×1
minimizing the 2-norm
kΦB r − P r k22 =
M
+1
X
(ΦB r − P r )2k .
(13)
k=1
To efficiently reconstruct the grid topology, we want to rely on
as few measurements as possible. If M +1 < N , we generally
have an underdetermined set of equations which admits many
possible solutions. Is it possible to obtain the correct solution
also in this case? Do we have more information about B r
which we can exploit? Indeed, we know that a power grid
is typically very sparse – a single substation is connected to
only few other substations. Thus we choose the one solution to
equation (12) which minimizes the number of non-zero entries
of B r . Unfortunately, the direct minimization is computationally hard in general. In 2006 Candes, Romberg, Tao and
Donoho showed that an efficient reconstruction is nevertheless
possible using a convex surrogate for sparsity: the 1-norm [18],
[19]. Under weak conditions, the correct sparse solution can
be calculated efficiently by minimizing the 1-norm
kB r k1 =
N
X
|B rk |
(14)
k=1
subject to the constraint (12). This problem can be mapped to
a linear program which we explicate in the following section.
B. Partial reconstruction
In applications we will rarely encounter the situation that the
structure of a power grid is completely unknown. In a typical
application we know the value of Brs of all transmission lines
(s, r) in one part of the grid and have to reconstruct only the
remaining entries of the matrix B – for instance we might
want to monitor the position of manual switches at remote
places of the grid.
To keep track of our knowledge about the network, we
define the matrix K ∈ RN ×N with entries
1 if the value of Brs is known for line (r, s)
Krs :=
0 otherwise.
(15)
We again proceed row by row. For the rth row we reduce
equation (12) to
red
Φred
= P red
(16)
r Br
r ,
where
P red
r
ϕc (t1 )
N
..
X
= Pr −
Brc Krc .
ϕc (tM )
c=1
1
(17)
and Φred
is the submatrix of Φr obtained by deleting all
r
columns c for which Krc = 1 and B red
is the submatrix of
r
B r obtained by deleting all rows r0 for which Kr,r0 = 1. The
dimension of the reduced linear system of equations (16) is
smaller than in the original problem (12), such that the correct
solution can typically be found from fewer measurements.
C. Reconstruction from power flow measurements
The reconstruction scheme introduced above requires the
knowledge of the voltage phase angle at all nodes of the grid.
This data can in principle be obtained using phasor measurement units (PMUs), but these are typically very expensive.
The measurement of other quantities such as real power flows
is typically much simpler.
Fortunately, we usually do not have to reconstruct the entire
grid in most cases. In a typical application we know a lot
about the grid and have to reconstruct only parts of the matrix
B. Then the measurement of power injections and real power
flows of a certain subset of transmission lines can be enough
to perform the reconstruction of the remaining data using
the methods described above. Technically, this amounts to
combining methods of classical state estimation and network
reconstruction.
So assume that we can measure the power injection Pn
for all nodes n ∈ {1, . . . , N } at the time steps t1 , . . . , tM .
In addition we have knowledge about the transmission line
parameters, in particular Xsr , and measure the real power flow
−1
Psr (tm ) = Xsr
ϕr (tm ) − ϕs (tm )
(18)
for a subset L of all transmission lines at all time steps
t1 , . . . , tM . If this set of equations is fully determined or even
overdetermined we reconstruct the state vector ϕ(tm ) as in the
classical state estimation problem described in section III. As
before the resulting estimates for the nodal phase angles for
all time steps t1 , . . . , tM are then summarized in the matrix
Φ. In addition we have partial knowledge about the nodal
susceptance matrix, in particular we already know the entries
−1
Brs = Bsr = −Xsr
(19)
for all (s, r) ∈ L. This information can then be used to
reconstruct the remaining entries of B as described in the
previous section.
V. I MPLEMENTATION
A. Least-squares solution
If we have many measurements or prior knowledge available, then the system of equations (12) can be be overdetermined. In this case equation must be solved in a least squares
fashion, i.e. we have to solve
min kΦB r − P r k22 ,
Br
(20)
JOURNAL OF LATEX CLASS FILES, VOL. 13, NO. 9, SEPTEMBER 2014
4
which leads to [15]
Start
B r = (ΦT Φ)−1 ΦT P r
(21)
Measurement of Φ and 𝑃
provided that Φ is full rank such that the inverse exists. Leastsquares solutions are already implemented in many numerical
solvers, for instance in the MATLAB function mldivide.
Add constraint ∑𝑐 𝐵𝑟𝑐 = 0
B. Minimizing the 1-norm
no
𝑟𝑘(Φ) < 𝑁 ?
The key to an efficient reconstruction of B from an underdetermined system of equations is the minimization of the
1-norm [18], [19]. This problem can be mapped to a linear
program which can be solved efficiently, i.e. the computation
time scales at most polynomially with the input length.
So we consider the linear system of equations (12) and
assume that it is solvable and underdetermined. The solutions
span an affine subspace of of RN with dimension D =
N − rank(Φ). All solutions can be written as
+ W y,
B r = B (sp)
r
Linear Sy
underdet
yes
𝑟 = 1
(sp)
Calculate Specific solution 𝐵𝑟
Solve linear program
(22)
(sp)
min𝑦 ‖𝑊𝑦 + 𝐵𝑟
‖
1
N ×D
where the columns of the matrix W ∈ R
form a basis
for the kernel (nullspace) of Φ and y ∈ RD is a vector of
is a specific solution to equation (12); in
parameters. B (sp)
r
the implementation it is obtained using the MATLAB function
mldivide. We now search for the vector y such that the 1norm (14) assumes its minimum. This optimization problem
is rewritten as a linear program [20]
min 1T s
s
+ Wy s
B (sp)
r
,
B (sp)
+ W y −s
r
such that
min f T x
x
such that
Ax b.
(sp) 𝑇
Set 𝐵(𝑟, : ) = [𝑊𝑦 + 𝐵𝑟
(24)
using the further auxiliary variables
y
W
−1l
x=
, A=
,
s
−W −1l
(sp)
Br
0
b=
,
f
=
,
1
−B (sp)
r
where 1l ∈ RN ×N is the identity matrix and 0 ∈ RD is a
vector of zeros.
C. Row-Wise Reconstruction
We first describe the implementation of the row-wise reconstruction of B from the measurement data without any prior
knowledge about the entries of B, whose basic idea has been
outlined in section IV-A. The algorithm to solve this problem
is illustrated by the flow-chart in Fig. 1. We implement this
algorithm in Matlab, the central part of the program code is
listed in Fig. 2.
First data is collected and the matrix Φ and the vectors
P r are formed. Then the problem is solved depending on the
rank of the matrix Φ. If the system is (over)determined, we
directly solve it for B using the Matlab-function mldivide.
]
𝐵 = Φ\𝑃𝑟
𝑟 = 𝑟+1
yes
𝑟≤𝑁
no
Return 𝐵
(23)
where s ∈ RN is an auxiliary variable, 1 ∈ RN is a vector
of ones and and denotes entry-wise comparison. In the
standard form of many commercial solvers the optimization
problem reads
underdet
Calculate null space 𝑊of Φ
Fig. 1. Flow chart for row-wise reconstruction. MATLAB code for the central
part is listed in Fig. 2.
If the system is underdetermined we proceed row-by-row and
reconstruct B r as described in section V-B using the function
null to compute the matrix W and the function linprog
to solve the linear program (24).
D. Iterative reconstruction
In practice we typically have some prior knowledge about
the entries of the matrix B as outlined in section IV-B. An
algorithm to perform the reconstruction exploiting the prior
knowledge is illustrated by the flow-chart in Fig. 3
Most interestingly, we can also use this algorithm to greatly
improve the convergence of the reconstruction algorithm. For
intermediate values of M we typically face the situation that
some rows are successfully reconstructed while others are
not. If we have not reconstructed B successfully, but gained
further knowledge, we may use it in the following. Having
successfully reconstructed the rth row of B, we also know the
entries Br0 ,r = Br,r0 for all other rows r0 due to the symmetry
of the matrix. We thus propose to perform the reconstruction
iteratively. In each step of the reconstruction process we use
the initial knowledge about the entries of the matrix B and
also the knowledge gained in previous steps.
The algorithm shown in Fig. 3 starts with the input of the
measurement results and the prior knowledge of the system
JOURNAL OF LATEX CLASS FILES, VOL. 13, NO. 9, SEPTEMBER 2014
5
Start
% Case 1: Overdetermined system:
if rank(Phi) >= N
Breconstruct = Phi \ Pt;
Input measurement results Φ, 𝑃𝑟
and prior knowledge 𝐵, 𝐾 new
Set 𝐾 = 𝐾 new , 𝑟 = 0
% Case 2: Underdetermined system:
else
Proceed to next row 𝑟 = 𝑟 + 1
% Calculate nullspace of Phi
W = null(Phi);
D = size(W,2);
Set Φ𝑟red , 𝑃𝑟red , 𝑁𝑟red = 𝑁 − Σ𝑐 𝐾𝑟𝑐
yes
𝑁𝑟red = 0 ?
no
% treat all rows separately:
for r=1:N
𝑟(Φred ) < 𝑁red
Linear Sy
underdet
underdet
no
yes
Solve linear program
min ‖𝐵𝑟red ‖1 s.t. Φred 𝐵𝑟red = 𝑃𝑟red
% one specific solution
Br_sp = Phi \ Pt(:,r);
no
%
f
A
b
y
y
Choose sparse solution
= [zeros(D,1); ones(N,1)];
= [W, -eye(N); - W, -eye(N)];
= [-Br_sp; +Br_sp];
= linprog(f,A,b);
= y(1:D);
𝐵𝑟red = Φ𝑟red \𝑃𝑟red
Successful?
new
Set 𝐾𝑟𝑐
= 1 ∀𝑐 = 1, … 𝑁
Add results 𝐵𝑟red to matrix 𝐵
no
𝑟 = 𝑁?
yes
𝐾
% Write result to matrix B
Breconstruct(r,:) = (W*y+Br_sp)’;
new
=𝐾?
yes
no
no
new
𝐾𝑟𝑐
= 1 ∀ 𝑟, 𝑐no
?
yes
Output
Warning
end
Return 𝐵
end
Fig. 2.
MATLAB code for row-wise reconstruction
which is encoded in the matrices B and K. It solves the
reconstruction problem iteratively, processing row-by-row in
each iteration. For each row, we first calculate the reduced
as defined in section IV-B. Then we
and P red
matrices Φred
r
r
attempt to reconstruct the vector B red
as described above: If
r
the problem is (over)determined we solve the linear system
of equations using the Matlab-function mldivide, if it is
underdetermined we minimize the 1-norm kB red
r k1 subject to
the constraint (16). If the reconstruction was successful, we
add the results to the matrix B and update the knowledge
matrix K. To facilitate the bookkeeping we define two matrices K and K new : We set K = K new at the beginning
of each iteration and only modify K new during the step. The
iteration stops when the reconstruction has been successfully
new
completed, i.e. Krc
= 1 for all r, c = 1 . . . , N , or when
no further progress has been made, i.e. K new has not been
modified during the last step.
One unsolved problem remains: If we do not know the
matrix B a priori, how can we know if the reconstruction of
the rth row has been successful? In the underdetermined case
we cannot decide whether the reconstructed values Brc are
definitely correct – but we can decide if they are reasonable in
terms of the connectivity of the grid. Power grids are generally
very sparse: A single substation is connected to only few other
Fig. 3.
Flow chart for the iterative reconstruction algorithm.
substations. Hence we seek for a solution which is most sparse,
i.e. which minimizes
kB r k0 = number of non-zero entries of B r .
(25)
However, we cannot minimize kB r k0 directly as this is a
computationally hard problem. The ingenious contribution of
Candes, Romberg, Tao and Donoho [18], [19] was the proof
that the most sparse solution can be obtained by minimizing kB r k1 with high probability if a sufficient amount of
measurement data is available. Otherwise we find a solution
which minimizes the 1-norm, but has a large number of nonzero entries kB r k0 . In algorithm in Fig. 3 we thus adopt the
definition that the reconstruction of the rth row is assumed
to be successful if (a) the linear system is overdetermined
or (b) the reconstructed row B r is sufficiently sparse, i.e.
kB r k0 ≤ dmax for some upper limit dmax . A typical value
used in the following is dmax = 15.
VI. A PPLICATIONS AND P ERFORMANCE
A. Reconstruction from time series
We demonstrate the applicability of network reconstruction
from time series measurements for a test grid taken from [21]
illustrated in Figure 4 (a). This data set includes hourly data
for demand and generation Pk (t) for one year and all N =
JOURNAL OF LATEX CLASS FILES, VOL. 13, NO. 9, SEPTEMBER 2014
6
(a)
φk(tm)
[degree]
Pk(tm)
[MW]
(b)
2000
0
1000
−100
0
−200
10
10
−10
−10
0
number of errors
(c)
minimum number of measurements
300
20
time t
m
40
[hour]
60
0
20
time t
m
40
[hour]
60
400
200
100
0
10 0
60
200
100
25
30
35
40
45
50
number of measurements M
55
60
Fig. 4.
Example of the complete grid reconstruction for a test grid with
N = 117 nodes. (a) Test grid from [21]. It is assumed that the network
topology, i.e. the location and parameters of the transmission lines (grey) are
completely unknown. (b) The reconstruction is based on the time series of
the nodal power injections Pk (t) and voltage angles ϕk (t). Two time series
are shown. (c) Performance of the iterative algorithm shown in Fig. 3. Perfect
reconstruction is obtained with M ≥ 55 measurements. We use the test grid
and the load and generation time series of the scenario 2013 from [21]. For
the sake of simplicity we have removed the import/export nodes and rescaled
the generation to exactly match the load.
117 nodes. The nodal voltage angles ϕk (t) are then obtained
by solving the DC approximation (3) for all time steps. The
resulting time series of the power injections and angles are
shown in Figure 4 (b) for two nodes as an example.
The algorithm shown in Figure 3 can now reconstruct
the entire network topology - i.e. all entries of the nodal
susceptance matrix B - from the time series data. To evaluate
the performance of the algorithm we vary the amount of input
data. For each value of M we run the algorithm and count the
number of successfully reconstructed entries and the number
of reconstruction errors. To account for small numerical errors,
we say that an entry (r, k) of the nodal susceptance matrix is
successfully reconstructed if
reconstructed
true
|Br,k
− Br,k
| < ,
(26)
where the numerical tolerance is chosen as = 10−3 ×
maxij |Bij |.
Figure 4 (c) shows that Mmin = 55 measurements are
sufficient to faithfully reconstruct the entire nodal susceptance matrix B. Most importantly, a faithful reconstruction is
possible in the strongly underdetermined case: The minimum
number of measurements Mmin = 55 is less than half of the
matrix dimension N = 117. This is possible because we can
10 1
10 2
10 3
10 2
10 3
(b)
40
20
0
10 0
300
0
20
(a)
10 1
grid size N
Fig. 5.
Performance of (a) the row-wise reconstruction algorithm shown
in Fig. 1 and (b) the iterative algorithm shown in Fig. 3. We have tested the
algorithms for several test grids from [22], [23] for synthetic power injection
data, choosing either the ϕk (blue circles) or the Pk (red crosses) randomly
(see text for details). Shown is the minimum number of measurements M
needed to obtain a faithful reconstruction as a function of the grid size N .
Results have been averaged over 10 random realizations.
exploit the sparsity of the matrix B as an additional structural
information.
B. Minimum Measurement Requirements and Scaling
The algorithms presented in figures 1 and 3 allow for a
reconstruction of the network topology also in the underdetermined case. But how many measurements Mmin are needed
for a faithful reconstruction and how does this number scale
with the grid size N ?
To systematically study the efficiency of the reconstruction
algorithms, we consider various test grids of different size
taken from [22], [23] and use randomized synthetic data for
the time series. We consider two different types of time series
data. First we draw the voltage phase angles ϕk (t) uniformly
at random from the interval [−π/8, +π/8] (type I). This
scenario is not realistic but close to the original mathematical
work [18], [19], where random Gaussian sampling vectors are
considered. Second, we choose the power injections Pk (t)
at random from a normal distribution with mean zero and
standard deviation as in the original test grid (type II). For
both types and both reconstruction algorithms (row-wise and
iterative), we run the reconstruction algorithm as a function
of the number of measurements M taken into account and
determine the minimum number of measurements Mmin for
a faithful reconstruction, i.e. zero reconstruction errors. Each
numerical experiment is repeated 10 times.
First, we observe that the iterative algorithm allows for a
faithful reconstruction from underdetermined input data for all
grids under consideration and both data types. The minimum
number of measurements Mmin is much smaller than the grid
size N in all cases. The row-wise algorithm performs less well
as it does not exploit the symmetry of the matrix B.
JOURNAL OF LATEX CLASS FILES, VOL. 13, NO. 9, SEPTEMBER 2014
power
flow
[MW]
(a)
7
prior knowledge
(b)
1
?
29.6
22.2
bus number
37
10
20
14.8
?
7.4
30
1
10
0
(c)
phase
angles
φk [°]
20
bus number
30
reconstructed network
(d)
1
4.8
3.6
bus number
6
10
20
2.4
1.2
30
1
10
0
20
bus number
30
Fig. 6. Reconstruction of missing information from flow measurements (a)
The IEEE 30-bus test grid. Real power flows are measured on the colored
lines. In two regions the grid topology is assumed to be unknown. (b) The
prior knowledge matrix K. Grey shading indicates that the respective line
parameter Bjk is known. The white region is completely unknown. (c) The
voltage phase angles ϕk are reconstructed from the power flow measurements
using standard state estimation methods. (d) The completely grid topology is
perfectly reconstructed using the algorithm shown in Fig. 3.
Second, efficient reconstruction is possible with both algorithms for the type I input data. The theory of compressed
sensing shows that a reconstruction of sparse vectors is possible with high probability from a number of measurements
scaling only logarithmically with the problem dimension N
if some conditions are satisfied [18], [19]. This logarithmic
scaling is well confirmed by the results of our numerical
experiments. For the iterative algorithm the scaling seems to
be even slower.
However, the proofs for the efficiency of compressed sensing depend on two features of the sampling vectors: isotropy
and incoherence. Roughly speaking, isotropy means that all
directions in the vector space are sampled equally well.
Incoherence guarantees that the redundancy in the information
gained by two measurements is small. Both features are no
longer guaranteed for type II input data. In fact, we observe
that the row-wise reconstruction algorithm does not perform
well in this case. The minimum number of measurements
Mmin is only slightly smaller than the problem dimension N
such that the iterative algorithm performs much better.
C. Reconstruction from flow measurements
The iterative algorithm allows to take into account prior
knowledge to efficiently reconstruct the missing information
about the grid topology. Such a problem can arise in practice
when a larger part of the grid is subject to damages or attacks.
An example of such a situation is depicted in figure 6 (a). It is
assumed that we have no reliable information about the grid
in two areas indicated by the question marks. However, we
do have information about the connections of all remaining
nodes and we assume that we can measure the real power
flow along the colored solid lines. The prior knowledge of the
grid topology is encoded in the matrix K, which is illustrated
in figure 6 (b). White entries indicate where we do not know
the entries of the matrix B.
The missing information is found by combining classical
state estimation and network reconstruction. First, the voltage
phase angles for all nodes of the network are reconstructed as
described in section III, the results being shown in figure 6 (c).
Second, the iterative reconstruction algorithm shown in figure
3 is applied using the measured power injections, the prior
knowledge B and K as well as the estimated voltage phase
angles as input data. The algorithm then faithfully reconstructs
all the missing information about the grid topology. The
−1
reconstructed values of the line susceptances Xsr
shown in
figure 6 (d) exactly match the true values. Most importantly,
the full reconstruction is possible already for M = 1 in this
case, i.e. with a single snapshot of the power injections P ,
making use of the prior knowledge.
VII. C ONCLUSION AND O UTLOOK
We have introduced two algorithms to reconstruct the structure of a power grid from nodal measurements only. One
algorithm is straightforward and row-based, reconstructing the
lines of the grid node by node. The second is iterative and
takes into account both prior knowledge about the presence of
absence of lines as well as the knowlegde generated by that
algorithm during previous steps. We have demonstrated how
these algorithms can be used to reconstruct the entire network
structure from time series or missing information on the grid
topology from a single snapshot.
The presented algorithms exploit several structural properties of power grids to reduce the number of necessary
measurements. Power grids are typically very sparse, i.e.
each substation is connected to only few other substations.
Hence, methods from compressed sensing can be used which
allow for a faithful reconstruction also in the underdetermined
case. The iterative reconstruction algorithm makes use of the
symmetry of the nodal susceptance matrix. Loosely speaking
the algorithm solves the simple parts of the reconstruction
problem first and than uses the gained information for the
remaining parts. We have shown that this trick leads to a vast
reduction of the measurement resources.
The present work presents a step towards hybrid state
estimation/network reconstruction algorithms. In future smart
grids one can face the situation where both nodal variables
and the grid topology are subject to uncertainties or lacking
information. A pure state estimation starting from perfect
knowledge of the network structure is then no longer sufficient.
Advanced grid monitoring algorithms must be able of coping
with missing information in both state and structure.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank D. Gross and R. Kueng for inspiring discussions. We gratefully acknowledge support from the Helmholtz
Association (via the joint initiative “Energy System 2050
- A Contribution of the Research Field Energy” and the
grant no. VH-NG-1025 to D.W.) and the Federal Ministry of
Education and Research (BMBF grant nos. 03SF0472B and
03SF0472E to D.W. and M.T.).
JOURNAL OF LATEX CLASS FILES, VOL. 13, NO. 9, SEPTEMBER 2014
R EFERENCES
[1] A. Meliopoulos, B. Fardanesh, and S. Zelingher, “Power system state
estimation: modeling error effects and impact on system operation,” in
Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on
System Sciences (HICSS-34). IEEE, 2001, p. 2012.
[2] A. J. Wood, B. F. Wollenberg, and G. B. Sheblé, Power Generation,
Operation and Control. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2014.
[3] Y. Yuan, G.-B. Stan, S. Warnick, and J. Goncalves, “Robust dynamical
network structure reconstruction,” Automatica, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 1230
– 1235, 2011.
[4] J. Yu, G. G. Karady, and L. Gu, “Applications of embedded hvdc in
power system transmission,” in 2012 Power Engineering and Automation
Conference, 2012, pp. 1–6.
[5] S. Bolognani, R. Carli, and M. Todescato, “State estimation in power
distribution networks with poorly synchronized measurements,” in 53rd
IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 2014, pp. 2579–2584.
[6] J. J. Grainger and W. D. Stevenson Jr., Power System Analysis. New
York: McGraw-Hill, 1994.
[7] K. Purchala, L. Meeus, D. V. Dommelen, and R. Belmans, “Usefulness
of dc power flow for active power flow analysis,” in IEEE Power
Engineering Society General Meeting, 2005, 2005, pp. 454–459 Vol.
1.
[8] D. Van Hertem, J. Verboomen, K. Purchala, R. Belmans, and W. L.
Kling, “Usefulness of DC power flow for active power flow analysis
with flow controlling devices,” in 8th IEE International Conference on
AC DC Power Transmission (ACDC 2006). IEE, 2006, pp. 58–62.
[9] M. Newman, Networks: An Introduction. New York: Oxford University
Press, 2010.
[10] N. Hwang and R. Houghtalen, Fundamentals of Hydraulic Engineering
Systems. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1996.
[11] E. Katifori, G. J. Szöllösi, and M. O. Magnasco, “Damage and Fluctuations Induce Loops in Optimal Transport Networks,” Phys. Rev. Lett.,
vol. 104, p. 48704, 2010.
[12] A. Abur and A. G. Exposito, Power system state estimation: theory and
implementation. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2004.
[13] M. Timme, “Revealing Network Connectivity from Response Dynamics,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 98, no. 22, p. 224101, 2007.
[14] S. G. Shandilya and M. Timme, “Inferring network topology from
complex dynamics,” New J. Phys., vol. 13, no. 1, p. 013004, 2011.
[15] M. Timme and J. Casadiego, “Revealing networks from dynamics: an
introduction,” J. Phys. A Math. Theor., vol. 47, no. 34, p. 343001, 2014.
[16] X. Han, Z. Shen, W.-X. Wang, and Z. Di, “Robust Reconstruction of
Complex Networks from Sparse Data,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 114, no. 2,
p. 028701, 2015.
[17] J. Stoer and R. Bulirsch, Introduction to Numerical Analysis. New
York: Springer, 1993.
[18] D. L. Donoho, “Compressed sensing,” Inf. Theory, IEEE Trans., vol. 52,
no. 4, pp. 1289–1306, 2006.
[19] E. J. Candes, J. K. Romberg, and T. Tao, “Stable signal recovery from
incomplete and inaccurate measurements,” Comm. Pure Appl. Math.,
vol. 59, no. 8, pp. 1207–1223, 2006.
[20] S. Boyd and L. Vandenberghe, Convex optimization.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 2004.
[21] H. Barrios, A. Roehder, H. Natemeyer, and A. Schnettler, “A benchmark
case for network expansion methods,” in Proc. IEEE PowerTech 2015
Eindhoven, 2015, pp. 1–6.
[22] R. D. Zimmerman, C. E. Murillo-Sanchez, and R. J. Thomas, “MATPOWER: Steady-State Operations, Planning and Analysis Tools for
Power Systems Research and Education,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst.,
vol. 26, p. 12, 2011.
[23] S. Fliscounakis, P. Panciatici, F. Capitanescu, and L. Wehenkel, “Contingency ranking with respect to overloads in very large power systems
taking into account uncertainty, preventive and corrective actions,” IEEE
Trans. Power Syst., vol. 28, p. 4909, 2013.
Farnaz Basiri Farnaz Basiri received the B.Sc. and M.Sc. degree in electrical
power engineering from the RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany in
2013 and 2015, respectively. Since 2015 she joined the Reaserch Group at
Reaserch Center Jülich, Germany as a Research Associate and is currently
pursuing the Ph.D. degree.
8
Jose Casadiego received his Licentiate degree in Physics from the University
of Carabobo (Venezuela) in 2009. He completed his PhD studies in the
International Max Planck Research School for Physics of Biological and
Complex systems (Göttingen) in 2016 working on model-free approaches for
revealing interactions in complex networks from collective dynamics. He now
works as a Postdoctoral Researcher at the Network Dynamics Group of the
Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization.
Marc Timme studied physics and applied mathematics at the Universities
of Würzburg (Germany), Stony Brook (New York, USA) and Göttingen
(Germany). He holds an M.A. in Physics from Stony Brook and a Doctorate
in Theoretical Physics (Göttingen). After postdoctoral and visiting stays at
Cornell University (New York, USA) and the National Research Center of
Italy (Sesto Fiorentino) he is heading the Max Planck Research Group on
Network Dynamics at the Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and SelfOrganization. He is Adjunct Professor at the University of Göttingen.
Dirk Witthaut received his Diploma (MSc) and PhD in Physics from the
Technical University of Kaiserslautern, Germany, in 2004 and 2007, respectively. He has been a Postodoctoral Researcher at the Niels Bohr Institute
in Copenhagen, Denmark and at the Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and
Self-Organization in Göttingen, Germany and a Guest Lecturer at the Kigali
Institue for Science and Technology in Rwanda. Since 2014 he is heading
a Research Group at Forschungszentrum Jülich, Germany and he is Junior
Professor at the University of Cologne, Germany.
| 3cs.SY
|
International Conference on Fascinating Advancement in Mechanical Engineering (FAME2008), 11-13, December 2008
Numerical Solution of Cylindrically Converging
Shock Waves
M. Shabouei, R. Ebrahimi and K. Mazaheri Body
Abstract—The cylindrically converging shock wave
was numerically simulated by solving the Euler equations in
cylindrical coordinates with TVD scheme and MUSCL [1]
approach, using Roe's approximate Riemann solver [2] and
super-bee nonlinear limiter [3]. The present study used the
in house code developed for this purpose. The behavior of
the solution in the vicinity of axis is investigated and the
results of the numerical solution are compared with the
computed data given by Payne [4], Lapidus [5], Abarbanel
and Goldberg [6] Sod [7] and Leutioff et al. [8].
Keywords—Compressible flow, Converging shock,
Cylindrical shock waves, Numerical simulation.
I. INTRODUCTION
The cylindrical converging shock problem was
computed by Payne [4], Lapidus [5], Abarbanel and
Goldberg [6], Satofuka [9], Sod [7], Ben-Artzi and
Falcovitz [10], Leutioff et al. [8] and Matsuo et al.
[11]. The finite difference method (the Lax scheme)
was first applied to the cylindrical shock tube problem
by Payne. Lapidus used the “Cartesian method” to
compute flows with radial symmetry. Comparisons
with Payne’s solutions indicated that there was a
difference in the shock speeds. Abarbanel and
Goldberg computed the same problem using an
iterative procedure based on the modified LaxWendroff method. The results were compared with
Payne’s solutions and it differed markedly from this
solutions. Satofuka used other difference schemes to
solve the present imploding shock problem. Sod
solved this problem and captured sharp discontinuity
throughout the calculation by combining the Glimm’s
random choice method [12] and time splitting. The
Mohammad Shabouei is MSc. Student at Dept. of Aerospace
Eng., Khaj-Nasir Toosi Univ. of Tech., Tehran, Iran, (corresponding
author
to
provide
e-mail:
[email protected],
[email protected]).
Reza Ebrahimi is Associate Professor at Dept. of Aerospace
Eng., Khaj-Nasir Toosi Univ. of Tech., Tehran, Iran, (e-mail:
[email protected]).
Kiumars Mazaheri Body is Associate Professor at Dept. of Mech.
Eng., Tarbiat Modares Univ., Tehran, Iran (e-mail:
[email protected]).
results were compared with the finite difference
methods and it indicated a difference in the time at
which the shock reached the axis. Ben-Artzi and
Falcovitz proposed "GRP" (generalized Riemann
problem) method as an upwind second-order scheme.
Cylindrical shock tube problems were tested and it
was in very good agreement with those of Abarbanel
and Goldberg and Sod. Leutioff et al. [8] used finite
difference scheme of invariant character proposed by
Rusanov [13].The results of the numerical calculation
are compared with Abarbanel and Goldberg and
Payne. Differences between the results are due to the
non-invariant character of the other methods. Matsuo
et al. [11] simulated propagation of the converging
shock wave, which is assumed to be generated by an
instantaneous energy release on a rigid cylindrical
wall. The results compared whit selfsimilar solution,
the random choice method, the method of
characteristics and the second-order finite difference
method with artificial viscosities. They all agreed with
one another except for the focusing stage.
A theoretical investigation of converging shock
waves by means of similarity solution in a perfect gas
has been presented by Guderley [14], Butler [15],
Zeldovich and Raizer [16], Whitham [17] and Lazarus
[18]. Van Dyke and Guttmann [19] and Hafner [20]
also proposed alternative methods to solve the
convergent shock problem. More recently Sharma and
Radha [21], Bilbao and Gratton [22], Samtaney and
Pullin [23], Hidalgoa and Mendozab [24] have
derived other similarity solution to this problem. A
famous self-similar solution that describes implosions
is the convergent shock wave solved first by
Guderley. Guderley showed that the strength of the
shock wave varies inversely in case of cylindrical or
spherical symmetry. A review on theoretical solution
has been written by Meyer-ter-Vehn and Schalk [25],
where additional references can be found.
Over the years many experimental works have been
done on cylindrically converging shock waves. Perry
and Kantrowitz [26], Wu et al. [27] , [28], Takayama
et al. [29], Watanabe et al. [30] and Eliasson et al.
[31] , [32] investigated such experiments. Perry and
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Mepco Schlenk Engineering College, Sivakasi, India
Kantrowitz and Wu et al. studied the production and
stability of convergent cylindrical shock waves.
Takayama et al. also investigated the stability of
converging cylindrical shock waves in air.
Watanabe et al. studied Shock wave focusing in a
vertical annular shock tube and the light emission
from a converging shock wave was investigated
experimentally by Eliasson et al. at their two reported
works.
The objective of the present work is to numerically
study a cylindrically converging shock wave and use
the in house code developed for this purpose in order
to identify fluid characteristics at various initial
conditions.
It is common to use annular shock tubes to create
and study converging shock waves. The converging
shocks are often visualized by either schlieren
photographs or interferograms taken during the
focusing process. These methods give a measure of
the shock position and shape development as a
function of time. With these techniques it is not
possible to measure other quantities, like temperatures
and pressures [32]. But with annular shock tubes can
perfectly compute flow properties. So, in the present
we use a cylindrical shock tube with a cylindrical
diaphragm of radius r0 separates two uniform regions
of a gas at rest where the outer pressure and density
being higher than the inner ones. At time t = 0 the
diaphragm is ruptured and the inward flow starts. A
shock wave is created and travels into the low
pressure region followed by a contact discontinuity
towards the axis, while an expansion fan travels
outward into the high pressure region.
In this system of differential equations the axis is a
singular point of the solution due to the polar
coordinates. To remove the singularity nature at the
centre, Payne [4] used extrapolation as a trick and
Lapidus [5] proposed the Cartesian method which
employed the equations in Cartesian coordinates.
In order to verify the CFD scheme, the
cylindrically converging shock wave and the shock
tube problem were first calculated and compared with
the data found in literatures and exact solution,
respectively. The CFD scheme is then used to study
the cylindrically converging shock. Variations of the
pressure and temperature profiles are traced step by
step during the simulations, and their dependence on
the initial conditions is discussed.
Following our previous study [33], the present
work also involves a distinct point: the initial pressure
and density ratio is much larger than that in the
preceding studies. Actually it ranges from tens to
thousands.
II. GOVERNING EQUATIONS AND NUMERICAL
SIMULATIONS
In this paper we consider the numerical study of the
compressible one-dimensional multi-component Euler
equations for an inviscid, non-heat conducting, and
cylindrically symmetric flow describing the unsteady
motion of converging cylindrical shock waves. The
equations can be written in conservation form for an
ideal gas in cylindrical coordinates as following
(AU ) (AF )
G
t
r
(1)
where
u
2
U u , F (U ) u P ,
E
u ( E P )
0
dA
G (U ) P
dr
0
whereas is the density, u is the velocity, P is the
pressure, E is the total energy; t and r are the
independent variables which represent time and the
space coordinate of symmetry respectively and A is
the flow cross section. Here
E
P
1
u2
( 1.0) 2
where is the ratio of specific heats and in this work
a constant greater than 1.0.After simplicity, the system
(1) can be written in the form
U F
G
t
r
where
u
1 dA
2
G
u
A dr
u ( E P )
and for cylindrical symmetry
2
(2)
International Conference on Fascinating Advancement in Mechanical Engineering (FAME2008), 11-13, December 2008
IV. CODE VERIFICATION
u
1
2
G
u
r
u ( E P )
The method of solution consists of a combination of
TVD scheme and operator splitting. To use method of
splitting, first remove the inhomogeneous geometry
source term G (U ) from the system (2). Thus we will
solve the system
U F
0
t
r
(3)
which reduces to one-dimensional Euler equations in
Cartesian coordinates. The system (3) is integrated
using the explicit Lax-Wendroff scheme. To obtain a
sharp and monotone discontinuities representation, a
TVD scheme and MUSCL [1] approach based on
Roe's approximate Riemann solver [2] is employed,
along with the super-bee limiter [3]. This scheme is
second-order accurate both in space and time.
Once system (3) has been solved, the system of
ordinary differential equations
dU
G
dt
(4)
is solved, the solution of system (3) being used to
obtain the geometry source term G (U ) in (4). In the
present work, we used the 2nd order Runge-Kutta
method to solve system (4).
III. DIMENSIONLESS EQUATIONS
The dependent variables are non-dimensionalized
with respect to the undisturbed fluid properties.
Density is dimensionless with 0 and pressure with
P0
where 1.4 . For the velocity, the sound
speed of the undisturbed fluid,
reference. The length scale is
c 0 , is used as the
r0 , the radius of the
diaphragm. Hence, the length scale does not change
for different gases. The time is dimensionless with the
length scale divided by the sound speed in the
undisturbed fluid (i.e., t 0 r0 c 0 ). The gas is
assumed to behave like an ideal gas which has the
non-dimensional equation of state in the
form P T .
Three numerical tests have been conducted to
validate the present simulation. The first two tests are
some extreme cases of one-dimensional unsteady
shock tube problems that were compared with the
exact solution and with numerical results of lattice
Boltzmann method (LBM) [34] to validate the TVD
scheme simulation. Generally speaking, the computed
properties (pressure, density, velocity and Mach No.)
profiles are in very good agreement with the exact and
LBM solutions of shock tube for wide range of initial
conditions.
As the third case, cylindrically converging shock
wave data are compiled from the literature and
compared to the present work to establish validation.
In general the overall trend of the computed results
agrees with those of previous simulations such as
Payne [4], Lapidus [5], Abarbanel and Goldberg [6],
Sod [7] and Leutioff et al. [8]. However, there exist
some discrepancies. The major difference is the time
at which the shock reaches the axis. In all the methods
used earlier the shock converges at the axis of
symmetry at a later or slightly earlier time than in our
case. Considering different assumptions in the
numerical simulations and the theoretical analysis, the
differences are understandable which will be
discussed in next section.
In conclusion, the code is well verified and the
numerical solutions are acceptable with reasonable
accuracy.
V. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
For the present numerical simulation the initial
pressure and density ratio as initial conditions, are
varied in a wide range from tens to thousands. In the
profiles given below initial pressure and density ratio
have the same value and the temperature in the two
initial regions inside and outside the diaphragm is
assumed to be equal. With increasing time the
temperature field becomes non-uniform. We took r0 ,
the radius of the diaphragm 1.0 and the mesh size
r 0.005 . The time step t is chosen such that
CFL condition, , is satisfied, i.e.
max(| u | c ) t / r
where ,in the present work is set to 0.5.
In the following, results cover the relatively wide
ranges of initial conditions from weak shock (the ratio
of initial conditions 4), intermediate strength (the ratio
10) to strong shock (the ratio 20).
In figure 1, initial pressure and density ratio is 4.
The pressure and temperature distribution is displayed
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Mepco Schlenk Engineering College, Sivakasi, India
at time intervals of 0.1 and 0.2 respectively. The
shock appears as a rapid variation in P and T which
is completely sharp. As time increases and the shock
travels towards the axis and the strength of it
increases.
contact discontinuity (similar to the shock wave) is
completely sharp.
Fig. 2 Pressure (a) and Density (b) profiles at time intervals
of 0.1 for initial pressure and density ratio 10.
In figure 2, initial pressure and density ratio is 10.
The pressure and density profile is shown at time
intervals of 0.1. In the density profile, the basic
properties of shock are similar to those of the pressure
and temperature distribution, except that the rise in
density across the shock is smaller, corresponding to a
temperature increase. In the density profile such as
temperature, a contact discontinuity appears.
In figure 3, initial pressure and density ratio is rise
to 20. The pressure and temperature distribution is
displayed at time intervals of 0.1. As predicted by
Payne [4] the stronger shock increases in strength
more rapidly than the weak shock as it approaches the
axis.
Fig. 1 Pressure (a) and Temperature (b) profiles at several
time steps for initial pressure and density ratio 4.
After the passage of the shock, the pressure at the
points behind it continues to rise. When the shock
reaches the axis, maximum but finite value of pressure
in convergence is occurred.
In the temperature profile, the basic properties of
shock are similar to those of the pressure distribution,
but the rise in temperature across the shock is higher.
In addition to the shock wave, in the temperature
graph a contact discontinuity appears. The contact
surface travels towards the axis behind the converging
shock. As a result of using the super-bee limiter, the
4
International Conference on Fascinating Advancement in Mechanical Engineering (FAME2008), 11-13, December 2008
similar trend of variations as those of previous works
even the present simulation of radially symmetric
flows is advantageous over the method used by earlier
researchers, because they are using schemes with
different degree of artificial viscosity which may
affect the physical situation and may change, up to
certain extent, the fundamental principles of
conservation.
With the most of other methods used in
comparison, the shock and contact discontinuity are
smeared and the smearing of contact discontinuity is
more dramatic.
In the graphs we get steeper gradients than the most
previous works will show. This leads to a better
position of the shock wave and contact surface, and at
the same time it indicates less dissipation.
In all the methods used earlier the shock converges
at the axis of symmetry at a later or slightly earlier
time than in our case. The time of convergence with
artificial viscosity for others it is given as t c 0.66
(Payne), t c 0.57 (Abarbanel and Goldberg) and
t c 0.5826 (Leutioff et al.). As a criterion for the
convergence-time the change of sign of the velocity in
the axis point was applied.
VI. CONCLUSION
Fig. 3 Pressure (a) and Temperature (b) profiles at time
intervals of 0.1 for initial pressure and density ratio 20.
This problem was solved by Payne [4] using Laxdifference scheme of first order and there is an
implicit term of artificial viscosity in this scheme by
approximation Abarbanel and Goldberg [6] have used
the modified Lax-Wendroff scheme and an additional
term is coming in their scheme which plays the role of
artificial viscosity and takes the values between 0.2
and 1.0. Lapidus [5] has used the Cartesian method
with Lax-Wendroff scheme, whereas Leutioff et al.
[8] used the Cartesian method with Rusanov's scheme
[13]. The artificial viscosity used in Leutioff et al. [8]
calculations is about 0.04 and is hundred times
smaller than the artificial viscosity used by Lapidus
[5] which is 4.0. Though the distributions of pressure,
Temperature and density in our case give the almost
The equation of gas dynamics are solved using a
TVD scheme and MUSCL [1] approach based on
Roe's approximate Riemann solver [2] is employed,
along with the super-bee limiter [3] which keeps the
shock waves and contact discontinuity perfectly sharp.
The results obtained above clearly demonstrate the
advantage of the scheme compared with the methods
used by other authors. It seems to be a powerful
method for computing flows with radialy symmetry
and gives very good description of discontinuities
during the simulations and the behavior of the
solution in the focusing stage.
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
B. Van Leer, "Towards the ultimate conservative difference
scheme. V.: A second-order sequel to Godunov's method ", J.
Comput. Phys., vol. 32, 1979, pp. 101-136.
P. L. ROE, "Approximate Riemann Solvers, Parameter
Vectors, and Difference Schemes", J. Comput. Phys., vol. 43,
1981, pp. 357-372.
P. L. ROE, "Characteristic-Based Schemes For The Euler
Equations", Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., vol. 18, 1986, pp. 337365.
R. B. Payne, "A numerical method for a converging
cylindrical shock", J. Fluid Mech., vol. 2, 1957, pp. 185-200.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Mepco Schlenk Engineering College, Sivakasi, India
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
A. Lapidus, "Computation of radially symmetric shocked
flows", J. Comput. Phys., vol. 8, 1971, pp. 106.
S. Abarbanel and M. Goldberg, "Numerical solution of quasiconservative hyperbolic systems of the cylindrical shock
problem" J. Comput. Phys., vol. 10, 1972, pp. 1.
G. A. Sod, "A numerical study of a converging cylindrical
shock", J. Fluid Mech., vol. 83, 1977, pp. 785-794.
D. Leutloff and K. G. Roesner, "Numerical Solution Of
Converging Shock Problem", Computers & Fluids, vol. 16,
No. 2, 1988, pp. 175-182.
N. Satofuka, "A study of difference methods for radially
symmetric shocked flows", Lecture Notes in Physics, (Edited
by R. D. Richtmyer), 1975, Springer, Berlin.
M. Ben-Artzi and J. Falcovitz, " An upwind second-order
scheme for compressible duct flows ", SIAM J. Sci. Statist.
Comput., vol. 7, No. 3, 1986, pp. 744-768.
H. Matsuo, Y. Ohya and K. Fujiwara, "Numerical Simulation
of Cylindrically Converging Shock Waves", J. Comput. Phys.,
vol 75, 1988, pp. 384-399.
J. Glimm, "Solution in the large for nonlinear hyperbolic
system of equations", Comm. Pure Appl. Math., vol. 18, 1965,
pp. 697.
V. V. Rusanov, "The calculation of non-stationary shock
waves with obstacles", Zh. Vychsl. mat. Fiz., vol. l, 1961.
G.
Guderley,
"Starke kugelige und zylindrische
Verdichtungsst6Be in der Nahe des Kugelmittelpunktes bzw.
der Zylinderachse", Luftfahrtforschung, vol. 19, 1942, pp. 302.
D. S. Butler, "Converging spherical and cylindrical shocks",
Armaments Research Establishment, Rep. No. 54/55, 1954.
Y. B. Zeldovich and Y. P. Raizer, Physics of Shock Waves and
High Temperature Hydrodynamic Phenomena—ll, Academic
Press, New York, 1967.
G. B. Whitham, Linear and Nonlinear Waves, Wiley, New
York, 1974.
R. B. Lazarus and R. D. Richtmyer, Report LA-6823-MS, Los
Alamos Sci. Lab., 1977.
M. Van Dyke and A. J. Guttmann, " The converging shock
wave from a spherical or cylindrical piston ", J. Fluid Mech.,
vol. 120, 1982, pp. 451.
P. Hafner, "Strong Convergent Shock Waves Near the Center
of Convergence:A Power Series Solution", SlAM J. Appl.
Math., vol. 48, 1988, pp.1244.
V. D. Sharma and CH. Radha, "Similarity Solutions For
Converging Shocks In a Relaxing Gas", Int. J. Engng Sci., vol.
33, No. 4, 1995, pp. 535-553.
[22] L.E. Bilbao and J. Gratton, "Spherical and cylindrical
convergent shocks", IL NUOVO CIMENTO, vol. 18 D, No. 9,
September 1996, pp. 1041-1060.
[23] R. Samtaney and D. I. Pullin, "On initial-value and self-similar
solutions of the compressible Euler equations", Phys. Fluids,
vol. 8 (10), October 1996, pp. 2650-2655.
[24] J. C. Hidalgoa and S. Mendozab, "Self-similar imploding
relativistic shock waves", Phys. Fluids, vol. 17, (096101)
2005, pp. 1-8.
[25] J. Meyer-Ter-Vehn and C. Schalk "Self-similar compression
waves in gas dynamics", Z. Naturforsch, vol. 37a, 1982, pp.
955-969.
[26] R. W. Perry and A. Kantrowitz, "The production and stability
of converging shock waves", J. appl. Phys., vol. 22, 1951, pp.
878.
[27] J. H. T. Wu, R. A. Neemeh, P. P. Ostrowski and M. N.
Elabdin, "Production of converging cylindrical shock waves
by finite element conical contractions", Shock tube and shock
wave research, (Edited by Bayne Ahlborn, Abraham
Hertzberg and David Russel), Seattle, 1977.
[28] J. H. T. Wu, R. A. Neemeh and P. P. Ostrowski,
"Experimental studies of the production of converging
cylindrical shock waves", AIAA, vol. 18, 1980.
[29] K. Takayama, H. Kleine, and H. Grönig, "An experimental
investigation of the stability of converging cylindrical shock
waves in air", Exp. Fluids, vol. 5, 1987, pp. 315.
[30] M. Watanabe, O. Onodera, K. Takayama, "Shock wave
focusing in a vertical annular shock tube", Shock waves at
Marseille IV: Shock structure and kinematics,1995.
[31] V. Eliasson, N. Tillmark, A. J. Szeri, and N. Apazidis, "Light
emission during shock wave focusing in air and argon", Phys.
Fluids, vol. 19, 2007.
[32] V. Eliasson, W. D. Henshaw, and D. Appelo, "On
cylindrically converging shock waves shaped by obstacles",
Physica D, 2008, pp. 1-7.
[33] M. Shabouei, R. Ebrahimi, and K. Mazaheri Body, "Numerical
Simulation of Converging Spherical Shock Problem", In Ninth
International Congress of Fluid Dynamics & Propulsion
(ICFDP 9), Alexandria, Egypt 2008.
[34] M. Komeili, M. Mirzaei, and M. Shabouei. "Performance of 1D and 2-D Lattice Boltzmann (LB) in Solution of the Shock
Tube Problem." In International Conference on Fascinating
Advancement in Mechanical Engineering (FAME2008), India,
2008, arXiv:1602.02675.
6
| 5cs.CE
|
Subspace Selection to Suppress Confounding
Source Domain Information in AAM Transfer Learning
Azin Asgarian1 , Ahmed Bilal Ashraf2 , David Fleet1 , and Babak Taati1,2,3
1
Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto
Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network
3
Institute of Biomaterials & Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto
arXiv:1708.08508v2 [cs.CV] 3 Oct 2017
2
Abstract
Active appearance models (AAMs) are a class of generative models that have seen tremendous success in face analysis. However, model learning depends on the availability
of detailed annotation of canonical landmark points. As a
result, when accurate AAM fitting is required on a different
set of variations (expression, pose, identity), a new dataset
is collected and annotated. To overcome the need for time
consuming data collection and annotation, transfer learning approaches have received recent attention. The goal
is to transfer knowledge from previously available datasets
(source) to a new dataset (target). We propose a subspace
transfer learning method, in which we select a subspace
from the source that best describes the target space. We
propose a metric to compute the directional similarity between the source eigenvectors and the target subspace. We
show an equivalence between this metric and the variance
of target data when projected onto source eigenvectors. Using this equivalence, we select a subset of source principal
directions that capture the variance in target data. To define
our model, we augment the selected source subspace with
the target subspace learned from a handful of target examples. In experiments done on six publicly available datasets,
we show that our approach outperforms the state of the art
in terms of the RMS fitting error as well as the percentage of
test examples for which AAM fitting converges to the ground
truth.
1. Introduction
Active appearance models (AAMs) are deformable generative models used to capture shape and appearance variation for various computer vision applications [1]. AAMs
have been very successful in applications where the objects of interest have spatial correspondence in structure,
e.g. face analysis (pre-processing for identity recognition,
pose-estimation, emotion recognition) [2–4], hand analysis
(hand and gesture recognition, accessibility applications)
[5, 6], and 3D brain segmentation [7].
Figure 1. Overview of Subspace Selection AAM transfer learning.
The left most column shows the case when the model is based only
on target domain examples. The right most column shows the case
when the model is based on the principal directions of the source
domain. In the middle, we show the situation where the target
model is augmented with those source principal directions which
capture target data variance.
The AAM model is constructed by building a statistical
shape model from a set of annotated landmark points which
are predefined to describe the shape of an object e.g. the
face. An appearance model is also built using a set of images that are warped to a canonical reference shape (usually
the mean of the shape model). For a given test image, model
fitting involves finding the best combination of shape and
appearance parameters such that the reconstructed shape
can be warped into the reference frame; and the input image (subjected to the same warp) is best described by the
reconstructed image based on the appearance parameters.
A key requirement for learning is the availability of a
training set consisting of images and detailed annotation
of landmark points. In an attempt to capture variations in
pose, expression, illumination, and identity, a number of
face datasets have been collected and annotated (e.g. [8,9]).
Although the collection and annotation of datasets was necessary to ensure that models capture enough variation, it has
also led the community to realize that collecting more and
more data might not be the best approach [10, 11].
Historically, every time AAM fitting was required on a
different set of variations, a new dataset would be collected
and annotated. Despite this effort over the last two decades,
the generalizability of AAMs to new domains remains challenging [10]. To overcome this issue, transfer learning has
received attention from the AAM research community [11].
Transfer learning techniques attempt to improve generalizability of AAMs to a new set of data (referred to as the target domain) through the transfer of knowledge learned from
a pre-existing set of data (referred to as the source domain).
In this paper, for transferring the learned knowledge we
focus on the principal directions of the source dataset and
propose to judiciously select a subspace from the space of
source data. We argue that not all principal source directions are useful, and some directions might even be detrimental to the AAM fitting process. We propose a method to
weed out the confounding directions that are not representative of target subspace. Specifically, we retain the source
basis vectors which co-vary with target examples and capture the variance in the target dataset. As a result, we end
up discarding source basis vectors that do not co-vary with
the target data. We then combine these retained source directions with the target subspace determined by a handful
of target examples. An overview of our approach is shown
in Figure 1.
Specific contributions in this paper are as follows:
• We propose a metric to compute the directional similarity between source eigenvectors and the target subspace. We show an equivalence between the directional similarity metric and the variance of target data
when projected onto source eigenvectors (§3).
• Capitalizing on this equivalence, we present a method
to select a subspace from source shape and appearance
models by picking a subset of principal directions that
capture the variance in target data. This retained subset
encodes the knowledge transferred from the source to
the target domain (§3).
• In experiments on six publicly available datasets, we
show that our approach outperforms a series of baselines including state of the art AAM transfer learning
method [11] (§5). Also we present several insights that
emerge by analyzing the source directions selected by
our algorithm (§5.1).
2. Background
We begin with a brief description of AAMs and their
training process, following [12]. We then review existing
literature on transfer learning methods for AAMs.
2.1. Active Appearance Models: A Review
An AAM is a generative model that captures variation of
shape and appearance from a set of labeled examples. The
model thus has two parts, one for shape, and another for
appearance.
Shape Model: A shape s is represented by a 2D mesh of V
vertices, s = (x1 , y1 , x2 , y2 , ..., xV , yV )T . Consider a set of
N training samples {(Ii , si ) | i ∈ {1, ..., N }}, each consisting of an image Ii and its corresponding shape si . To build
a model, the shape samples (s1 , s2 , ..., sN ) are first aligned
using Generalized Procrustes Analysis [12]. The outcome
of procrustes analysis is a global 2D similarity transformation which can also be modeled by a linear combination of
four basis vectors [12]. The set of four basis vectors modeling the global transformation will be denoted Φg . Let the
matrix Z = [z1 , z2 , ..., zN ] ∈ R2V ×N consist of the aligned
shape samples. By applying PCA to Z we get the orthonormal shape eigenvectors (that model local shape variation) Φl ∈ R2V ×K (where K < N ), and the corresponding eigenvalues λ ∈ RK . Φg and Φl are then combined
to give the shape model {µ, Φ}, where Φ ∈ R2V ×(K+4) ,
and µ ∈ R2V is the mean shape. Any arbitrary shape sample s can now be represented in this model as ŝ = µ + Φp,
where
p = ΦT (s − µ), p = (p1 , p2 , ..., pK+4 )T ∈ RK+4 ,
represents the shape parameters of s.
Appearance Model: To train the appearance model, each
training image Ii is first warped from its shape si to the
mean shape µ, and then vectorized to form ai ∈ RL . The
appearance model is built by applying PCA to the matrix
A = (a1 , a2 , ..., aN ) ∈ RL×N , thus yields the mean appearance ν ∈ RL , the orthonormal appearance eigenvectors
Ψ ∈ RL×M (where M < N ), and corresponding eigenvalues κ ∈ RM . Any vectorized appearance sample a can then
be represented by a set of appearance parameters q, where
q = (q1 , q2 , ..., qM )T ∈ RM .
A trained AAM model is specified by its components:
A = (µ, Φ, λ, ν, Ψ, κ). Fitting an image I to model A involves finding the best combination of shape and appearance parameters such that there exists a warp mapping
the reconstructed shape into the reference frame; and the
squared difference between the input image (subjected to
the same warp) and the reconstructed image (based on the
appearance parameters) is minimized.
2.2. Transfer Learning for AAMs
Although AAMs have seen tremendous success for a
number of computer vision applications, their generalizablity is still sometimes challenging [10]. Specifically,
when fitting is required on a very different set of images
than those used to train the model, the fitting performance
declines [10, 11]. This has led to the collection and annotation of many datasets (e.g. [8, 9]). If we have to fit AAMs
to images that capture a different set of variations in expression, pose, illumination, or identity, ideally one would prefer to avoid the annotation step altogether or annotate only
a handful of examples.
When a model is learned using only a few annotated examples, often it is not sufficiently expressive due to lack of
enough variation [11]. What is the best way to make use of
the already annotated datasets? How best to fuse the knowledge learned from multiple data sources and generalize it to
new data? These questions warrant investigating the use of
transfer learning for AAMs, wherein the goal is to transfer
knowledge gained from previously available data (referred
to as the source domain) to a new set of data (referred to as
the target domain).
Transfer learning comes in several settings depending on
whether the data are labeled in the source/target domain and
whether the learning tasks in the source and target domains
are the same [13]. In the context of AAM transfer learning,
we focus on the situation when very few annotated examples are available for the target (T) domain, while the source
(S) domain has a significant number of annotated examples,
possibly coming from different datasets.
Let the model AT = (µT , ΦT , λT , νT , ΨT , κT ) be
learned from only a few target samples (e.g. < 10). Such
a model leads to extreme overfitting, due to the lack of
variation in the training set [14]. This effect becomes pronounced especially when the model is trained with high dimensional images [11], as is often the case. On the other
hand, a model AS = (µS , ΦS , λS , νS , ΨS , κS ) trained
only with source samples has significant variation, but a
part of this variation might not be representative of the target domain. This can act as a confounding factor for the
fitting process. There is thus a need to make use of however
little knowledge is available from the target data, while simultaneously capitalizing on the large body of information
available in the source domain. The goal of AAM transfer learning is to use both the target and the source samples
to train a model A∗ = (µ∗ , Φ∗ , λ∗ , ν ∗ , Ψ∗ , κ∗ ), such that
A∗ outperforms both AT and AS on test samples from the
target domain.
2.3. Baselines
The source-only and target-only models (AS and AT )
serve as a bare minimum baseline that a transfer learning approach must outperform. A useful transfer learn-
ing method should also outperform a model trained directly on the union of the source and target data denoted
by ASU T = (µSU T , ΦSU T , λSU T , νSU T , ΨSU T , κSU T ).
The fourth baseline we consider is the subspace transfer
(ST) method [11], which employs the mean shape and mean
appearance of target model, i.e. µST = µT and νST = νT .
However, eigenvectors are evaluated by concatenating the
source and target basis vectors, followed by a QR decomposition on matrices [ΦT , ΦS ] and [ΨT , ΨS ], to orthogonalize the basis vectors. Finally, the current state-of-the-art
AAM transfer learning employs an instance-weighted (IW)
approach by assigning weights to source domain samples
based on importance sampling [11].
3. Subspace Selection
Our method1 aims to transfer the knowledge gained from
the source domain by selecting a subspace from the source
dataset. First, we retain the target basis vectors ΦT as is,
so that the information gained from target samples is not
lost. Moreover, since the number of target examples assumed to be small, we propose to augment the target basis
vectors with additional principal directions from the source
data that are most representative of target space.
What should be our criterion to select source eigenvectors that are representative of the target subspace? Since
all the basis vectors in ΦS and ΦT are of unit norm, every
vector in ΦS is related to those in ΦT through a rotation,
i.e.
(
i ∈ {1, ..., NS }
φTj = Ri→j φSi
(1)
j ∈ {1, ..., NT }
where φSi and φTj are the i-th and j-th eigenvectors in ΦS
and ΦT respectively, and Ri→j is the rotation between the
two vectors. This makes the squared cosine of the angle
between φSi and φTj as a natural measure of similarity between the two eigenvectors.
One measure of the overall similarity of the φSi to the
target subspace ΦT , denoted γi , is defined as:
γi =
NT
X
cos2 θi→j
(2)
j=1
where θi→j is the angle between φSi and φTj . However, all
the directions in ΦT are not equally important and, therefore, we propose that the similarity metric between φSi and
ΦT should also encode the relative importance of eigenvectors in ΦT . Specifically, we define a weighted combination
of individual similarities (cos2 θi→j ) such that each term is
weighted by the corresponding eigenvalue associated with
φTj , i.e.
1 Our code is available at https://github.com/azinasg/
AAM_TL.
γi(weighted) =
NT
X
λTj cos2 θi→j
(3)
j=1
Because all eigenvectors have unit norm, we can write
the above as follows:
γi(weighted) = φTSi (ΦT ΛT ΦTT )φSi
(4)
where ΛT is a diagonal matrix containing target eigenvalues
along the diagonal. We note that the term in the parentheses
is the eigen decomposition of the target covariance matrix,
therefore
γi(weighted) = φTSi (
1
ZT ZTT )φSi
NT − 1
(5)
where ZT ∈ R2V ×NT contains the aligned and mean centered shape samples from the target.
We have thus shown that the weighted similarity metric
between φSi and the target subspace ΦT is exactly equal
to the variance of the target data in the direction of the i-th
source eigenvector. In particular, we define the variance of
the target data given source model as
2
), with σi2 =
σT2 |ΦS = (σ12 , σ22 , ..., σK
S
1
φT ZT ZTT φSi
NT − 1 Si
(6)
So σi2 is a measure of similarity between the i-th source
eigenvector and target subspace. Therefore, in order to
choose a subset of source eigenvectors that best represents
the target subspace, we propose to sort the source eigenvectors in descending order of σi2 (instead of the default
ordering based on source eigenvalues,).
After rearranging the source eigenvectors, we pick up the
top D eigenvectors from the rearranged version of ΦS to get
ΦD . We treat D as a hyper-parameter, which we determine
by cross validation. We then concatenate the target basis
vectors i.e. ΦT with ΦD , and orthonormalize them using
QR factorization to get Φ∗ to define our model. The steps
involved in our subspace selection method are summarized
in Algorithm 1.
3.1. Appearance
To evaluate the appearance part of our model, there are
two differences in the procedure. First, since ΨS and ΨT
are defined within two different base meshes i.e. µS and
µT , for finding projected target variance in appearance,
we warp all eigenvectors of ΨS from given mean µS to
µT with a piecewise affine warp WµS →µT (ΦS ). Second,
after finding ΨD , before QR decomposition, all appearance eigenvectors must be defined in the mean shape of the
model, which again can be done easily by defining a piecewise affine warp.
Algorithm 1 Subspace Selection Algorithm
1: procedure S ELECTION (ΦT , ΦS , ZT )
2:
for each ΦSi ∈ ΦS do
3:
σi2 = NT1−1 ΦTSi ZT ZTT ΦSi
4:
end for
5:
ΦD ← First D basis vectors of ΦS arranged
2
)
based on σT2 |ΦS = (σ12 , σ22 , ..., σK
S
∗
6:
Φ ← QR factorization([ΦT , ΦD ])
7:
return Φ∗
8: end procedure
4. Experimental Setup
4.1. Data
To compare our approach with other methods, we have
conducted extensive experiments over six publicly available face datasets. In all, 555 samples were randomly selected from the following databases: LFPW [4], Helen [15],
CK+ [9], iBUG [16], and AFW [17]. Images from the above
datasets have ground truth annotations for 68 points. Images in the CK+ dataset cover seven posed expressions. The
rest of the datasets cover a large variation in pose and illumination, and the majority of images are from young people
and children with happy or neutral expressions.
In addition, we selected 320 examples from the UNBCMcMaster Shoulder Pain Expression Archive [8] by temporal downsampling (1 in 100) of videos in the dataset. The
UNBC-McMaster dataset contains real expressions of pain
from persons with shoulder injury. Each image in this data
has ground truth annotation for 66 points. For other datasets
which had 68 point annotations, the two additional points
(inner corners of mouth) were removed so that annotations
were consistent across all datasets. All experiments were
thus done with 66 point annotations. In terms of the choice
for source and target domains we considered the following
two settings:
Setting 1: Real expressions in target: In this setting,
UNBC-McMaster dataset was considered as the target domain, while the rest of the datasets were considered as
the source domain. Five examples were randomly selected
from the target domain to define the target training set. The
test set consisted of 210 examples by excluding all the images from persons which were part of the training set. Since
UNBC-McMaster data consists of real expressions of pain,
in this setting the target domain consists of real expressions
not present in the source.
Setting 2: Posed expressions in target: In this setting,
CK+ dataset was considered as the target domain. The
purpose of this setting is to present a further challenge to
transfer learning methods by considering a target domain
with multiple posed or fake expressions (e.g. sadness, anger,
8
6
80
Test Examples Converged (%)
7
Mean RMS Error (% face size)
90
Target (T)
Source (S)
Union of S & T (SUT)
Subspace Transfer
Instance-Weighted [11]
Ours
5
4
70
60
Target (T)
Source (S)
Union of S & T (SUT)
Subspace Transfer
Instance-Weighted [11]
Ours
50
40
30
20
10
3
0
50
100
150
Iteration
200
250
0
1.5
300
(a) RMS fitting error (Target: UNBC-McMaster)
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
RMS Error (% face size)
4.5
5.0
(b) % of test examples converged (Target: UNBC-McMaster)
Figure 2. Comparison of RMS fitting error and the percentage of converged test examples in Setting 1.
6.0
5.0
80
Test Examples Converged (%)
5.5
Mean RMS Error (% face size)
90
Target (T)
Source (S)
Union of S & T (SUT)
Subspace Transfer
Instance-Weighted [11]
Ours
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
70
60
Target (T)
Source (S)
Union of S & T (SUT)
Subspace Transfer
Instance-Weighted [11]
Ours
50
40
30
20
10
0
50
100
150
Iteration
200
250
300
(a) RMS fitting error (Target: CK+)
0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
RMS Error (% face size)
4.5
5.0
(b) % of test examples converged (Target: CK+)
Figure 3. Comparison of RMS fitting error and the percentage of converged test examples in Setting 2.
etc.) which are absent or substantially underrepresented in
the source domain. For this setting, the source domain not
only excluded the CK+ dataset (because it is the target domain), but also excluded UNBC-McMaster (which might
include expression variations similar to CK+) to make the
setting more challenging. For training, five examples were
randomly picked from the target domain. The test set consisted of 150 examples by excluding all the images from
persons which were part of the training set.
4.2. Fitting Details
For fitting, the Wiberg Inverse Compositional algorithm
was used [2, 3]. We consider the fitting procedure as converged when the relative change in the cost function is very
small (< 10−5 ). The maximum number of iterations was
set to 300. To initialize the fitting procedure, a bounding
box is first fit around the face using the Viola-Jones face detector [18]. Then the mean shape of target (µT ) is fit to the
face bounding box by estimating a transformation (including only scale and translation). We call this initialization
the base initialization. To avoid getting stuck in poor local
minima we try 10 different perturbations around the base
initialization by adding Gaussian noise in scale, translation,
and rotation.
4.3. Performance Metrics
We use two standard criteria defined previously in the literature [3, 10] for evaluating AAM performance. The first
criterion is the fitting accuracy. To quantify fitting accuracy, we measure the RMS error between the points of fitted
shape and the ground truth landmark points normalized by
the face size (average height and width of face) as suggested
in [17]. The second criterion is the percentage of test examples that converge to the ground truth shape given a tolerance in the RMS fitting error (here, 10−5 ). Specifically, we
analyze the percentage of test examples that converged to
the ground truth as a function of the RMS error tolerance.
Proportion of Test Examples Converged
1.0
Default Ordering
Ordering Based on Proposed Metric
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0
5
10
15
Number of Shape Components
20
Figure 4. Percentage of converged test examples (with normalized
RMS error less than 0.05) shown as a function of D, where D
represents the top D source eigenvectors as ordered according to
our proposed metric compared against the default ordering
5. Results
We compare different models in terms of the RMS
error and percentage convergence for Setting 1 (UNBCMcMaster as target) in Figure 2. The curves in Figure 2(a)
show the RMS error (averaged over examples for which the
converged RMS error was less than 5% of the face size) as
a function of iterations. The plots in Figure 2(b) show the
percentage of test examples converged to the ground truth
as a function of RMS tolerance in pixels. The corresponding curves for Setting 2 (CK+ as target) are shown in Figure 3. For both settings our approach outperforms all other
methods in terms of RMS error as well as the percentage
of test examples that converge to the ground truth. For our
approach, the number of source principal components that
were selected (i.e. the hyper-parameter D) was determined
to be 3 for shape, and 30 for appearance using cross validation. Cross validation was performed by varying D and
picking the top D source eigenvectors ordered according to
their ability to capture variance in target data as determined
in Equation 6.
In Figure 3, curves showing the two performance metrics should be interpreted together. For instance, in Figure
3(a) and 3(b), we see that the “Target” model has a good fitting accuracy over converged trials, while the percentage of
convergence is very low. This is possibly due to the the lack
of expressiveness of the model based only on target examples. On the other hand, the “Source” model has a higher
rate of convergence, but the fitting accuracy is low. Also
the “SUT” model performs well above the “Target” model
and close to the “Source” model with a slight improvement
resulting from the inclusion of target samples. The IW ap-
Figure 5. Representative examples for AAM fitting. The first two
rows and the last two rows show RMS fitting error and a visualization of AAM fitting on two test examples from UNBC-McMaster
dataset and CK+ respectively.
proach [11] has a small improvement in percentage of converged examples over previous models; but unexpectedly
performs worse than the “Target” model in terms of the fitting accuracy, perhaps due to the source weight heuristics
thereby affecting the target principal directions as well. Our
approach improves the percentage of converged examples,
and the fitting error is significantly decreased.
Figure 4 shows the percentage of converged trials with
RMS error less than 0.05, obtained by picking top D source
eigenvectors as ordered by our metric (magenta plot). For
comparison we also show the same by picking top D eigenvectors based on the default ordering using their corresponding eigenvalues i.e. according to variance of source
data. It shows that our approach outperforms this default
ordering by ∼12 percentage points in convergence rate on
average.
In Figure 5 we show the visual comparison of AAM fitting for different approaches. The first two rows show test
samples from UNBC-McMaster dataset which include examples of pain expression and/or older adults not in the
source domain of Setting 1. The last two rows show test
samples from the CK+ dataset showing substantial fake expressions which were absent in the source domain of Setting
2. In all cases, the fitting results of our algorithm (last column) are closer to the actual landmark points and the RMS
fitting error is also the minimum.
% Var (S) = 55.73 % Var (T) = 6.46
% Var (S) = 1.36 % Var (T) = 1.45
% Var (S) = 15.78 % Var (T) = 5.26
% Var (S) = 1.32 % Var (T) = 0.23
% Var (S) = 6.31 % Var (T) = 16.60
% Var (S) = 1.04 % Var (T) = 4.59
% Var (S) = 3.81 % Var (T) = 8.04
% Var (S) = 0.87 % Var (T) = 3.20
% Var (S) = 2.67 % Var (T) = 4.82
% Var (S) = 0.70 % Var (T) = 0.92
% Var (S) = 2.34 % Var (T) = 4.94
% Var (S) = 0.59 % Var (T) = 3.25
% Var (S) = 1.83 % Var (T) = 0.44
% Var (S) = 0.56 % Var (T) = 8.31
Figure 6. Visualization of Source principal directions. The three selected shape eigenvectors augmented to the target space are shown in
green box. For every principal direction, the percentage variance captured in the source and target domains is also shown.
5.1. Analysis of Selected Source Directions
6. Conclusions and Future Work
In this section we analyze the source principal directions
picked by our subspace selection method. A visualization
of source shape principal components for Setting 2 is shown
in Figure 6. The arrows on the landmark points indicate
the difference vector between the eigenvector and the mean
shape. The three selected eigenvectors are enclosed in green
boxes. For every principal component, we also show the
percentage variance of the source and target samples when
projected onto the component. The first two selected eigenvectors are principal directions which cover sizable variance
around the mouth and eye region, explaining why they were
selected because the target data set has significant expression variation around these regions. Similarly, the third selected eigenvector has dominant motion around the eyebrow
region.
In this paper we have presented a transfer learning
method for AAMs. Our method is based on selecting a
subset of source eigenvectors that are most representative
of the target subspace. This selection is based on a metric that captures the directional similarity between source
eigenvectors and the target subspace. We have shown an
equivalence between the similarity metric and the variance
captured by source eigenvectors in the target space – which
was our basis for selecting a subset of source principal components. We have conducted our experiments over six publicly available datasets and have tested challenging scenarios wherein the variations in the target domain were substantially different from those in the source domain. Our
method outperforms the state of the art AAM transfer learning approach [11] and other baselines. We note that the experimental setups tested in [11] were significantly less challenging as examples for source and target domains came
from the same dataset.
For further analysis, we looked into the source examples
that are best explained by the selected directions (Figure 7).
As can be seen, these are the source examples which are explained well by direction vectors capturing target variance
and show more vivid expressions around the mouth and eye
regions. On top of these images in Figure 7, we also show
the weight assigned to them by the instance-weighted approach. As a comparison, in the last row we show source examples which were highly weighted by the same approach.
We see that neutral and smiling faces which are in majority in the source get weighted by the heuristic IW approach,
while the source examples which are perhaps more representative of the target data are given low weights. However,
by selecting only those eigenvectors which capture target
variance, we see that we are able to encode the information
from just the right source examples, and transfer it to the
target domain.
We have demonstrated that even when only a handful of
annotated target examples are available, superior AAM fitting could be achieved using our transfer learning approach.
Collecting and annotating datasets is a painstaking and time
consuming step. This often becomes an obstacle in the way
of using AAM fitting in novel application settings. Our
work can have potential impact on extending the use of
AAMs to new application domains. For instance, within
clinical settings, there is growing interest to use facial expression analysis for healthcare applications such as pain
monitoring in older adults, assessing signs of depression,
aggression, and agitation. In contexts such as the above,
collection of large datasets is doubly challenging because
of patient confidentiality and privacy issues. In the future
we plan to investigate how well our method generalizes to
applications not involving face analysis such as brain seg-
basis vector 3
basis vector 4
w = 0.043
basis vector 14
w = 0.128
w = 0.196
w = 0.044
w = 0.042
Source samples that are best aligned with selected bases (and
corresponding
weights using Haase et al.’s heuristic)
w = 0.55
w = 0.79
w = 1.0
w = 0.68
w = 0.49
w = 0.51
w = 0.45
Highest weighted source samples using Haase et al.’s heuristic
Figure 7. Source examples that are best explained by the selected
eigenvectors on the basis of target variance. Within the source data
these examples turn out to be less frequent examples. We also
show the weights assigned to these examples using the instanceweighted approach [11]. Last row shows source samples that were
assigned highest weights based on [11].
mentation.
7. Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the AGE-WELL NCE,
the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), and the
Toronto Rehabilitation Institute University Health Network
(TRI-UHN).
References
[1] Timothy F Cootes, Gareth J Edwards, Christopher J Taylor, et al. Active appearance models. IEEE Transactions
on PAMI, 23(6):681–685, 2001.
[2] Joan Alabort-i Medina, Epameinondas Antonakos, James
Booth, Patrick Snape, and Stefanos Zafeiriou. Menpo: A
comprehensive platform for parametric image alignment and
visual deformable models. In ACM International Conference
on Multimedia, pages 679–682. ACM, 2014.
[3] Joan Alabort-i Medina and Stefanos Zafeiriou. A unified
framework for compositional fitting of active appearance
models. IJCV, pages 1–39, 2016.
[4] Peter N Belhumeur, David W Jacobs, David J Kriegman, and
Neeraj Kumar. Localizing parts of faces using a consensus of
exemplars. IEEE transactions on PAMI, 35(12):2930–2940,
2013.
[5] Sumaira Kausar and M. Younus Javed. A survey on sign language recognition. In Frontiers of Information Technology,
pages 95–98, Washington, DC, USA, 2011. IEEE Computer
Society.
[6] T. Heap and D. Hogg. Towards 3d hand tracking using a
deformable model. In Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, pages 140–145, Oct 1996.
[7] Z.R. Luo, X.J. Zhuang, R.Z. Zhang, J.Q. Wang, C. Yue,
and X. Huang. Automated 3d segmentation of hippocampus based on active appearance model of brain mr images
for the early diagnosis of alzheimer’s disease. Minerva Med.,
105:157–165, 2014.
[8] Patrick Lucey, Jeffrey F Cohn, Kenneth M Prkachin, Patricia E Solomon, and Iain Matthews. Painful data: The unbcmcmaster shoulder pain expression archive database. In Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition and Workshops, pages
57–64. IEEE, 2011.
[9] Patrick Lucey, Jeffrey F Cohn, Takeo Kanade, Jason Saragih,
Zara Ambadar, and Iain Matthews. The extended cohnkanade dataset (ck+): A complete dataset for action unit and
emotion-specified expression. In CVPR Workshops, pages
94–101. IEEE, 2010.
[10] Joan Alabort-i Medina and Stefanos Zafeiriou. Bayesian active appearance models. In Proceedings of the IEEE CVPR,
pages 3438–3445, 2014.
[11] Daniel Haase, Erid Rodner, and Joachim Denzler. Instanceweighted transfer learning of active appearance models. In
CVPR, pages 1426–1433, 2014.
[12] Iain Matthews and Simon Baker. Active appearance models
revisited. IJCV, 60(2):135–164, 2004.
[13] Sinno Jialin Pan and Qiang Yang. A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Transactions on knowledge and data engineering,
22(10):1345–1359, 2010.
[14] Ralph Gross, Iain Matthews, and Simon Baker. Generic vs.
person specific active appearance models. Image and Vision
Computing, 23(12):1080–1093, 2005.
[15] Vuong Le, Jonathan Brandt, Zhe Lin, Lubomir Bourdev, and
Thomas S Huang. Interactive facial feature localization. In
ECCV, pages 679–692. Springer, 2012.
[16] Christos Sagonas, Georgios Tzimiropoulos, Stefanos
Zafeiriou, and Maja Pantic. 300 faces in-the-wild challenge:
The first facial landmark localization challenge. In IEEE
ICCV Workshops, pages 397–403, 2013.
[17] Xiangxin Zhu and Deva Ramanan. Face detection, pose estimation, and landmark localization in the wild. In CVPR,
pages 2879–2886. IEEE, 2012.
[18] Paul Viola and Michael J Jones. Robust real-time face detection. IJCV, 57(2):137–154, 2004.
| 1cs.CV
|
1
An Approximate ML Detector for MIMO
Channels Corrupted by Phase Noise
arXiv:1708.02321v1 [cs.IT] 7 Aug 2017
Richard Combes and Sheng Yang
Abstract
We consider the multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) communication channel impaired by phase
noises at both the transmitter and receiver. We focus on the maximum likelihood (ML) detection problem
for uncoded single-carrier transmission. We derive an approximation of the likelihood function, based
on which we propose an efficient detection algorithm. The proposed algorithm, named self-interference
whitening (SIW), consists in 1) estimating the self-interference caused by the phase noise perturbation,
then 2) whitening the said interference, and finally 3) detecting the transmitted vector. While the exact
ML solution is computationally intractable, we construct a simulation-based lower bound on the error
probability of ML detection. Leveraging this lower bound, we perform extensive numerical experiments
demonstrating that SIW is, in most cases of interest, very close to optimal with moderate phase noise.
More importantly and perhaps surprisingly, such near-ML performance can be achieved by applying
only twice the nearest neighbor detection algorithm. In this sense, our results reveal a striking fact: nearML detection of phase noise corrupted MIMO channels can be done as efficiently as for conventional
MIMO channels without phase noise.
Index Terms
MIMO systems, phase noise, maximum likelihood detection, probability of error.
I. I NTRODUCTION
We consider the signal detection problem for the following discrete-time multiple-input multipleoutput (MIMO) channel
y = diag ejθr,1 , . . . , ejθr,nr H diag ejθt,1 , . . . , ejθt,nt x + z ,
(1)
The authors are with the Laboratory of Signals and Systems (L2S), CentraleSupélec, 3 rue Joliot-Curie, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette,
France. (e-mail: richard.combes,[email protected])
August 9, 2017
DRAFT
2
where H ∈ Cnr ×nt is the channel matrix known to the receiver; z ∈ Cnr ×1 represents a realization
of the additive noise whereas θt,l and θr,k are the phase noises at the l th transmit antenna and
the k th receive antenna, respectively; the input vector x ∈ Cnt ×1 is assumed to be carved
from a quadratic amplitude modulation (QAM). The goal is to estimate x from the observation
y ∈ Cnr ×1 , with only statistical knowledge on the additive noise and the phase noises.
In the case where the phase noise is absent, the problem is well understood, and the maximum likelihood (ML) solution can be found using any nearest neighbor detection (NND)
algorithm (see [1] and the references therein). In particular, the sphere decoder [2] has been
shown to be very efficient [3], so that its expected complexity (averaged over channel realizations)
is polynomial in the problem dimension nt . Furthermore, there exist approximate NND algorithms (e.g., based on lattice reduction) that achieve near-ML performance when applied for
MIMO detection [4].
The presence of phase noise in (1) is both a practical and long-standing problem in communication. In their seminal paper [5] back in the 70’s, Foschini et al. used this model to
capture the residual phase jitter at the phase-locked loop of the receiver side, and investigated
both the performance of decoding algorithms as well as constellation design in the scalar
case (nt = nr = 1). As a matter of fact, in most wireless communication systems, phase noise
is present due to the phase and frequency instabilities in the radio frequency oscillators used at
both the transmitter and the receiver [6]. The channel (1) can be seen as a valid mathematical
model when the phase noise varies slowly as compared to the symbol duration.1 While phase
noise can be practically ignored in conventional MIMO systems, its impact becomes prominent
at higher carrier frequencies since it can be shown that phase noise power increases quadratically
with carrier frequency [6], [8]. The performance degradation due to phase noise becomes even
more severe with the use of higher order modulations for which the angular separation between
constellation points can be small. At medium to high SNR, phase noise dominates additive noise,
becoming the capacity bottleneck [9], [10]. As for signal detection, finding the ML solution for
the MIMO phase noise channel (1) is hard in general. Indeed, unlike for conventional MIMO
channels, the likelihood function of the transmitted signal cannot be obtained in closed form.
1
As pointed out in [7] and the references therein, an effective discrete-time channel is usually obtained from a waveform
phase noise channel after filtering. When the continuous-time phase noise varies rapidly during the symbol period, the filtered
output also suffers from amplitude perturbation. More discussion is provided in Section VI-D.
August 9, 2017
DRAFT
3
Our Contribution. In this work, we propose an efficient MIMO detection algorithm which
finds an approximate ML solution in the presence of phase noise. The main contributions of this
work are summarized as follows.
(i) We derive a tractable approximation of the likelihood function of the transmitted signal.
While the exact likelihood does not have a close-form expression, the proposed approximation has a simple form and turns out to be accurate for weak to medium phase noises.
(ii) Since maximizing the approximate likelihood function over a discrete signal set is still
hard, we propose a heuristic method that finds an approximate solution by applying twice
the nearest neighbor detection algorithm. The proposed algorithm, called self-interference
whitening (SIW), has a simple geometric interpretation. Intuitively, the phase noise perturbation generates self-interference that depends on the transmitted signal through the
covariance matrix. The main idea is to first estimate the covariance of the self-interference
with a potentially inaccurate initial signal solution, then perform the whitening with the
estimated covariance, followed by a second detection. From the optimization point of view,
our algorithm can be seen as a (well-chosen) concave approximation to a non-concave
objective function.
(iii) We assess the performance of SIW and competing algorithms in different communication
scenarios. Since the error probability of ML decoding is unknown, we propose a simulationbased lower bound which we use as a benchmark. Simulation results show that SIW
achieves near ML performance in most scenarios. In this sense, our work reveals that
near optimal MIMO detection with phase noise can be done as efficiently as without phase
noise. Although the likelihood approximation is derived using the assumption that the phase
noise has a Gaussian distribution, our numerical experiments show that SIW works well
even with non-Gaussian phase noises.
Related Work. Receiver design with phase noise mitigation has been extensively investigated
in the past years (see [11], [12] and references therein). More complex channel models, including
multi-carrier systems (e.g., OFDM) and time-correlated phase noises (e.g., the Wiener process)
have also been considered. In particular, joint data detection and phase noise estimation algorithms have been proposed in [13], [11]. A phase noise estimation based scheme to improve the
system performance for smaller alphabets has been proposed in [12]. However, the challenging
problem of signal detection in MIMO phase noise channels using higher order modulation, where
August 9, 2017
DRAFT
4
performance is extremely sensitive to phase noise, has not been addressed adequately before.
The remainder of the paper is organized as follows. We start with a formal description of
the problem in the next section. The approximation of the likelihood function is derived in
Section III-A, followed by the proposed algorithm described in Section III-B. The hardness of
finding the exact ML solution is investigated in Section IV. We present the numerical experiments
in Section V. Further discussion on the proposed algorithm and relevance of the considered
channel model is provided in Section VI. Section VII concludes the paper.
II. A SSUMPTIONS AND P ROBLEM F ORMULATION
Notation
Throughout the paper, we use the following notation. For random quantities, we use upper
case letters, e.g., X, for scalars, upper case letters with bold and non-italic fonts, e.g., V , for
vectors, and upper case letter with bold and sans serif fonts, e.g., M , for matrices. Deterministic
quantities are denoted in a rather conventional way with italic letters, e.g., a scalar x, a vector
v , and a matrix M . The Euclidean norm of a vector v is denoted by kvv k, respectively. The
transpose and conjugated transpose of M are M T and M H , respectively.
A. System model
In the following, we describe formally the channel model (1) presented in the previous section.
We assume a MIMO channel with nt transmit and nr receive antennas. Let H denote the
channel matrix, where the (k, l)-th element of H , denoted as hk,l , represents the channel gain
between the l th transmit antenna and k th receive antenna. The transmitted vector is denoted
by x = [x1 , . . . , xnt ]T , where xl ∈ X , l = 1, . . . , nt , X being typically a QAM constellation
P
with normalized average energy, i.e., |X1 | x∈X |x|2 = 1. For a given transmitted vector x , the
received vector in base-band can be written as the following random vector
Y = Λ RH Λ T x + Z ,
(2)
where the diagonal matrices Λ R := diag ejΘr ,1 , . . . , ejΘr ,nr and Λ T := diag ejΘt,1 , . . . , ejΘt,nt
capture the phase perturbation at the receiver and transmitter, respectively; Z is the additive
white Gaussian noise (AWGN) vector with Z ∼ CN (0, γ −1I ), where γ is the nominal signalto-noise ratio (SNR). We assume that the phase noise Θ := [Θt,1 · · · Θt,nt Θr,1 · · · Θr,nr ]T is
jointly Gaussian with Θ ∼ N (0, Q θ ) where the covariance matrix Q θ can be arbitrary. Note
August 9, 2017
DRAFT
5
that this model includes as a special case the uplink channel in which nt is the number of
single-antenna users. In such a case, the transmit phase noises are independent. For simplicity,
we consider uncoded transmission in which each symbol xl can take any value from X with
equal probability.
Further, we assume that the channel matrix can be random but is perfectly known at the
receiver, whereas such knowledge at the transmitter side is irrelevant in uncoded transmission.
We also define H Θ := Λ RH Λ T and accordingly H θ for some realization of Θ = θ . By definition,
we have H 0 = H . Finally, we ignore the temporal correlation of the phase noise process and
the channel process, and focus on the spatial aspect of the signal detection problem.
B. Problem formulation
With AWGN, we have the following conditional probability density function (pdf)
p(yy | x , θ , H ) =
γ nr −γkyy −H
Hθ x k2
e
,
π nr
(3)
from which we obtain the likelihood function by integrating over Θ
p(yy | x , H ) = EΘ p(yy | x , Θ , H )
i
h
γ nr
y −H
HΘ x k2
−γky
+ ln nr .
= ln EΘ e
π
(4)
(5)
The ML detector finds an input vector from the alphabet X nt such that the likelihood function
is maximized. In practice, it is often more convenient to use the log-likelihood function as the
objective function, i.e., after removing a constant term
h
i
y −H
HΘ x k2
−γky
x
y
H
Q
f (x , , , γ, θ ) := ln EΘ e
,
(6)
where the arguments γ and Q θ can be omitted whenever confusion is not likely. Thus,
xML (yy , H ) := arg maxn f (x
x, y , H ).
x̂
x ∈X
t
(7)
From (7) we see two main challenges to compute the optimal solution:
1) The expectation in (7) cannot be obtained in closed form. A numerical implementation is
equivalent to finding the numerical integral in nt + nr dimensions. This can be extremely
hard in high dimensions.
2) The size of the optimization space, |X |nt , can be prohibitively large when the modulation
size |X | and the input dimension nt become large.
August 9, 2017
DRAFT
6
In Section IV, we examine in more details why both of these issues are indeed challenging.
In a conventional MIMO channel without phase noise, finding the ML solution is reduced to
solving the following problem
x0ML (yy , H ) := arg minn kyy − H 0 x k2 ,
x̂
x ∈X
t
(8)
which is also called the minimum Euclidean distance detection or nearest neighbor detection (NND). Although the search space in (8) remains large, the expectation is gone. Furthermore,
since the objective function is the Euclidean distance, efficient algorithms (e.g., sphere decoder [2]
or lattice decoder [1]) exploiting the geometric structure of the problem can be applied without
searching over the whole space X nt . It is shown in [3] that the sphere decoder has a polynomial
average complexity with respect to the input dimension nt when the channel matrix is drawn
i.i.d. from a Rayleigh distribution.
In practice, one may simply ignore the existence of phase noise and still apply (8) to obtain
x0ML which we refer to as the naive ML solution in our work. While this can work relatively
x̂
well when the phase noise is close to 0, it becomes highly suboptimal with stronger phase noise
which is usually the case in high frequency bands with imperfect oscillators. In this paper, we
provide a near ML solution by circumventing the two challenges mentioned earlier. We first
propose an approximation of the likelihood function. Then we propose an algorithm to solve
approximately the optimization problem (7).
III. P ROPOSED S CHEME
A. Proposed Approximation of the Likelihood Function
In this section, we propose to approximate the likelihood function with the implicit assumption
that the phase noise is not large. Indeed, in practice, the standard deviation of the phase noise
is typically smaller than 10 degrees ≈ 0.174 rad. For stronger phase noises, it is no longer
reasonable to use QAM and the problem should be addressed differently.
ΛRH Λ Tx k = kΛ
ΛH
H Λ Tx k,
The likelihood function (3) depends on the Euclidean norm kyy −Λ
R y −H
in which the difference vector ΛH
R y − H Λ Tx can be rewritten and approximated as follows
jθθ t
e
HDx Dy]
ΛH
(9)
R y − H Λ Tx = [−H
e−jθθ r
HDx Dy] θ,
≈ (yy − H x ) − j[H
August 9, 2017
(10)
DRAFT
7
where we define D x := diag(x1 , . . . , xnt ), D y := diag(y1 , . . . , ynr ), and recall that θ := θ Tt
θ Tr
T
(10) is from the linear approximation2 ejθθ = 1 + jθθ + o(θθ ). Thus the Euclidean norm has the
corresponding real approximation:
Aθ + b k2 ,
kyy − Λ RH Λ Tx k2 ≈ kA
where A ∈ R2nr ×(nt +nr ) and b ∈ R2nr ×1 are defined as
H D x)
Dy )
Im (H
Im (D
Re (yy − H x )
, b :=
.
A :=
H D x ) − Re (D
Dy )
− Re (H
Im (yy − H x )
(11)
(12)
With the above approximation, we can derive the approximation of the log-likelihood function.
Proposition 1. Let A and b be defined as in (12). Then we have the following approximation of
h
i
y −H
H θ xk2
−γky
x, y , H , γ, Q θ ) with
the log-likelihood function ln EΘ e
≈ fˆ(x
1
x, y , H ) := −γ b TWx−1b − ln det (W
Wx ) ,
fˆ(x
2
(13)
AQ θA T .
Wx := I + 2γA
(14)
where Wx is defined as
Hence, the proposed approximate ML (aML) solution is
1
T
−1
xaML (yy , H ) := arg minn γ b Wx b + ln det (W
Wx ) .
x̂
x ∈X t
2
(15)
Proof. Since we assume that Θ ∼ N (0, Q θ ), we have
Z
h
i
1
1 −1
T
T
T
AΘ +bbk2
−γkA
2
A A + Q θ ) θ − 2γbb Aθ − γkbbk
EΘ e
=p
d θ exp −θθ (γA
(16)
Qθ ) θ
det(2πQ
{z 2
}
|
1 −1
Q
2
s
Q)
det(Q
Q)A
ATb
exp −γkbbk2 + γ 2b TA (2Q
Qθ )
det(Q
Z
1
1 −1
T
T
T
Q)A
A b ) Q (θθ + γ(2Q
Q)A
A b)
· dθ p
exp −(θθ + γ(2Q
2
Q)
det(2πQ
θ
s
Q)
det(Q
Q)A
ATb
=
exp −γkbbk2 + γ 2b TA (2Q
Qθ )
det(Q
s
Q)
det(Q
A((2Q
Qθ )−1 + γA
ATA )−1A T )bb
=
exp −γbbT (II − γA
Qθ )
det(Q
=
2
(17)
(18)
(19)
Here we use, with a slight abuse of notation, ejθθ to denote the vector obtained from the element-wise complex exponential
operation. Similarly, the little-o Landau notation o(θθ ) is element-wise.
August 9, 2017
DRAFT
;
8
(a) 4-QAM, f = fˆ = −10.
(b) 16-QAM, f = fˆ = −4.
(c) 64-QAM, f = fˆ = −1.6.
Fig. 1: The proposed approximation of the likelihood function in the scalar case. Solid line is
the actual likelihood level set, dashed line is the approximation. Here γ = 30dB and phase noise
has standard deviation 3◦ at the transmitter and at the receiver.
s
=
Q)
det(Q
A(2Q
Qθ )A
AT )−1b
exp −γbbT (II + γA
Qθ )
det(Q
1
T
T −1
b
I
A
Q
A
b
=p
exp
−γb
(I
+
2γA
)
,
θ
AQ θA T )
det(II + 2γA
(20)
(21)
where (18) holds since the integrand in (17) is a pdf with respect to θ ; (20) is from the Woodbury
−1
V . Taking the logarithm and we obtain
matrix identity (II + U C V )−1 = I − U C −1 + V U
the approximated log-likelihood function (13).
In Figure 1, we illustrate the proposed approximation for 4-, 16-, and 64-QAM. In all three
cases, we plot for each constellation point a level set of the likelihood function with respect to “yy ”
in solid line. The level sets of the approximated likelihood function are plotted similarly in dashed
line. While the likelihood function is evaluated using numerical integration, the approximation is
in closed form given by (13). In this figure, we observe that the approximation is quite accurate,
especially for signal points with smaller amplitude. Further, the resemblance of the level sets for
the approximate likelihood to ellipsoids suggests that the main contribution in the right hand side
of (13) comes from the first term −γ b TWx−1b . We shall exploit this feature later on to construct
the proposed algorithm.
Qθ → 0, i.e., when the phase noise vanishes faster than
Remark 1. We can check that when γQ
the AWGN does, the above solution minimizes kbbk2 = kyy − H x k2 , which corresponds to the
optimal NND solution in the conventional MIMO case. Nevertheless, when the phase noise does
August 9, 2017
DRAFT
9
not vanish, the approximate log-likelihood function (13) depends on x in a rather complex way,
due to the presence of the matrix Wx . Focusing on the term b TWx−1b , we can think of Wx as
the covariance matrix of some equivalent noise. Indeed, if we approximate the multiplicative
phase noise as an additive perturbation, then the perturbation is a self-interference that depends
on the input vector x . This perturbation is not isotropic nor circularly symmetric, and can be
captured by the covariance matrix Wx . Some more discussions in this regard will be given in
the following subsection.
While the proposed approximation simplifies significantly the objective function, the optimization problem (15) remains hard when the search space is large. For instance, with 64-QAM
and 4 × 4 MIMO, the number of points in Xtn is more than 107 ! Therefore, we need further
simplification by exploiting the structure of the problem.
B. The Self-Interference Whitening Algorithm
As mentioned above, the difficulty of the optimization (15) is mainly due to the presence of
the matrix Wx that depends on x . Let us first assume that the Wx corresponding to the optimal
xaML were somehow known, and is denoted by Wx̂x . Then the optimization problem (15)
solution x̂
would be equivalent to
1
T
−1
Wx̂x )
xaML (yy , H ) = arg minn γ b Wx̂x b + ln det (W
x̂
x ∈X t
2
= arg minn b TWx̂x−1b
x ∈X
(23)
t
−1
−1
Wx̂x 2 ỹy − Wx̂x 2 H̃
H x̃
x k2 ,
= arg minn kW
x ∈X
− 21
where Wx̂x
(22)
t
−1 H
−1
x, ỹy , and H̃
H are defined by
is any matrix such that Wx̂x 2 Wx̂x 2 = Wx̂x−1 ; x̃
x)
H ) − Im (H
H)
Re (x
Re (yy )
Re (H
, ỹy :=
, H̃
.
x :=
H :=
x̃
x)
H ) Re (H
H)
Im (x
Im (yy )
Im (H
(24)
(25)
Note that for a given Wx̂x , (24) can be solved efficiently with any NND algorithm. Unfortunately,
xaML , the exact Wx̂x cannot be found. Therefore, the idea is
without knowing the optimal solution x̂
x, and then solve the optimization
to first estimate the matrix Wx̂x with some suboptimal solution x̂
problem (24) with a NND. We call this two-step procedure self-interference whitening (SIW).
August 9, 2017
DRAFT
10
x0ML as the initial estimate to obtain Wx̂x , and
For instance, we can use the naive ML solution x̂
have
−1
−1
ML
ML
x0aML (yy , H ) = arg minn kW
Wx̂x0 2 ỹy − Wx̂x0 2 H̃
H x̃
x k2 .
x̂
x ∈X
t
(26)
Remark 2. The intuition behind the SIW scheme is as follows. From the definition of Wx in
(14) and A in (12), we see that Wx depends on x only through H D x . First, the column space
of H D x does not vary with x since D x is diagonal. Second, a small perturbation of x does
x0ML is close to the
not perturb Wx too much in the Euclidean space. Since the naive ML point x̂
actual point x in the column space of H , it provides an accurate estimate of Wx . This can also
be observed on Figure 1c, where we see that the ellipsoid-like dashed lines have similar sizes
and orientations for constellation points that are close to each other.
Remark 3. Another possible initial estimate is the naive linear minimum mean square error (LMMSE) solution. As the naive ML, the naive LMMSE ignores the phase noise and returns
H H (γ −1I + H H H )−1y − x k2 .
x0LMMSE (yy , H ) := arg minn kH
x̂
x ∈X
t
(27)
It is worth mentioning that in the presence of phase noise the naive LMMSE is not necessarily
dominated by the naive ML solution, as will shown in the numerical experiments of Section V.
The main algorithm of this work is described in Algorithm 1. In the algorithm, the complex
function NND(yy , H , X ) finds among the points from the alphabet X the closest one to y in
H , X̃ ) is the real counterpart of NND. The
the column space of H ; the function realNND(ỹy , H̃
x0 )” embeds the real vector x̃
x0 to the complex space by taking the upper
function “complex(x̃
half as the real part and the lower half as the imaginary part. It is worth noting that the newly
obtained point is accepted only when it has a higher approximate likelihood value than the naive
ML point does. An example of the scalar case is provided in Figure 2 where 256-QAM is used.
The transmitted point is x and the received point is y. The solid line is the level set of the
likelihood function. If the likelihood function was computed for each point in the constellation,
then one would recover x from y successfully. But this would be hard computationally. With
the Euclidean detection, x̂ that is closer to y than x is would be found instead, which would
cause an erroneous detection. The SIW algorithm can “correct” the error as follows. First, to
estimate the unknown matrix Wx , we compute the matrix Wx̂x which is represented by the red
dashed ellipse around x̂. We can see that the estimate Wx̂x is very close to the correct value Wx ,
August 9, 2017
DRAFT
11
Algorithm 1 Self-interference whitening
Input: y , H , γ, Q θ
x0LMMSE from (27)
Find x̂
x0ML ← NND(yy , H , X )
Find x̂
x0ML , y , H , γ, Q θ ) then
x0LMMSE , y , H , γ, Q θ ) > fˆ(x̂
if fˆ(x̂
x ← x̂
x0LMMSE
x̂
else
x ← x̂
x0ML
x̂
end if
x using (12) and (14)
Generate Wx̂x from x̂
1
Find Wx̂x2 using the Cholesky decomposition
H according to (25)
Generate ỹy and H̃
−1
−1
x0 ← realNND(W
Wx̂x 2 ỹy , Wx̂x 2 H̃
H x̃
x, X̃ )
x̃
x0 ← complex(x̃
x0 )
x̂
x0 , y , H , γ, Q θ ) > fˆ(x̂
x, y , H , γ, Q θ ) then
if fˆ(x̂
x0aML ← x̂
x0
x̂
else
x0aML ← x̂
x
x̂
end if
x(2)
Output: x̂
aML
given by the actual x (blue dashed line). Then, we generate the coordinate system with Wx̂x and
search for the closest constellation point to y in this coordinate system. In this example, x can
be recovered successfully. More importantly, computationally efficient NND algorithms can be
used to perform the search.
Remark 4. The complexity of the SIW algorithm is essentially twice that of the NND algorithm
used, since the other operations including the LMMSE detection have at most cubic complexity
with respect to the dimension of the channel. The complexity of the NND algorithm depends directly on the conditioning of the given matrix. If the columns are close to orthogonal, then channel
inversion is almost optimal. However, in the worse case, when the matrix is ill-conditioned, the
NND algorithm can be slow and its complexity is exponential in the problem dimension. As
August 9, 2017
DRAFT
12
x
y
x̂ = x̂0ML
2
3
Wx̂
x
1
y
x̂ = x̂0ML
Fig. 2: Illustration of the proposed detection in the scalar case. An example with 256-QAM,
PN 2◦ . The dashed lines represent the ellipse defined by the matrix Wx̂ (in red) and Wx (in blue).
mentioned earlier, there exist approximate NND algorithms, e.g., based on lattice reduction, that
can achieve near optimal performance with much lower complexity.
IV. H ARDNESS OF ML D ECODING
In the section we explore how ML decoding may be implemented. While in most cases
of interest the SIW algorithm gives near-optimal performance, and ML decoding is too costly
computationally, it is useful to simply provide lower bounds on the performance of any decoding
algorithm. We comment on the difficulty of implementing ML decoding, in particular when the
dimensions nr , nt are large. For simplicity, we assume that {Θt,k }k=1,...,nt are i.i.d. N (0, σt2 ) and
{Θr,k }k=1,...,nr are i.i.d. N (0, σr2 ).
A. Hardness of computing the likelihood
h
i
HΘ x k2
To compute the likelihood one needs to compute EΘ e−γkyy −H
. For large dimensions,
this seems impossible to do in closed form or using numerical integration. However a natural
August 9, 2017
DRAFT
13
alternative is to use the Monte-Carlo method, using the following estimate:
!
s
X
1
2
H (t) x k
Θ
x, y , H , γ, Q θ ) ≈ F̂s := ln
fˆ(x
,
e−γkyy −H
s t=1
(28)
where Θ (1) , . . . , Θ (s) are s i.i.d. copies of Θ . Using the delta method [14] and the central limit
theorem, the asymptotic variance of this estimator is
HΘ x k2
1 Var e−γkyy −H
Var(F̂s ) ∼
2 ,
s
HΘ x k2 ]
E [e−γkyy −H
s → ∞.
(29)
Let us compute this quantity in the (arguably easiest) case where H is the identity matrix with
nt = nr = n:
2
kyy − HΘ x k =
n
X
2
yk − xk ej(Θr,k +Θt,k ) .
(30)
k=1
Define the one-dimensional likelihood
h
i
j(Θr +Θt ) |2
g(x, y, γ, σ) := E e−γ|y−xe
,
and using independence we calculate the moments:
n
h
i Y
y −H
HΘ xk2
−γky
E e
=
g(xk , yk , γ, σ),
Var(e
y −H
HΘ xk2
−γky
)=
k=1
n
Y
g(xk , yk , 2γ, σ) −
k=1
(31)
(32)
n
Y
g(xk , yk , γ, σ)2 .
(33)
k=1
From (29), the asmyptotic variance is hence:
Var(F̂s ) =
where v(x, y, γ, σ) :=
g(x,y,2γ,σ)
.
g(x,y,γ,σ)2
j(Θr +Θt ) |2
random variable e−γ|y−xe
1
s
n
Y
!
v(xk , yk , γ, σ) − 1 .
(34)
k=1
It is noted that, unless σr2 + σt2 = 0 or x = 0, or y = 0, the
cannot be a constant. Thus, we have v(xk , yk , γ, σ) > 1 for
k = 1, . . . , n. As a result, the asymptotic error (34) grows exponentially with the dimension n,
so that the Monte-Carlo method is infeasible in high dimensions, since the number of samples
must also scale exponentially with n to maintain a constant error.
For instance, consider xk = yk = 1 for all k, γ = 40dB, nr = nt = 20, and σr = σt = 3
degrees. Then v ≈ 7, so that, to obtain an error smaller than 0.1, one would require s ≈ 1018
samples, which is clearly not feasible in practice.
August 9, 2017
DRAFT
14
B. Hardness of maximum likelihood search
Assume that one is able to estimate the value of the likelihood with high accuracy (as seen
above this is typically hard), and denote by f¯ this value. We may then consider the following
algorithm. Given the received symbol y , and a radius ρ, one first computes the set of points
x ∈ X nt : kyy − H x k2 ≤ ρ2 }, then one computes the value of f¯ for each of those
S := {x
points and returns the point maximizing f¯. In the large system limit, the following concentration
phenomenon occurs.
Proposition 2. Assume that H has i.i.d. entries with distribution CN (0, 1) and X is chosen
Y − HX k2 . Then we have:
uniformly at random from X nt . Define the radius R2 := kY
2 +σ 2
σr
t
+ γ −1 nr ,
E R2 = 2nt nr 1 − e− 2
(35)
and for any η > 0 we have:
n
o
P (1 − η)E R2 ≤ R2 ≤ (1 + η)E R2 → 1,
(36)
nt , nr → ∞.
Note that the above result is general and does not impose that the number of antennas nr , nt
scale at the same speed. We draw two conclusions from this result: (i) Any such algorithm applied
p
with radius (1 + η) E [R2 ] for any η > 0 is guaranteed to inspect the optimal point with high
probability. (ii) Any such algorithm
which
r has a large success
probability needs to inspect every
2
√
σ 2 +σ
point in a sphere of radius O
nt nr 1 − exp − r 2 t
, and therefore typically has a very
high complexity.
From the above analysis we see that the second difficulty of the decoding problem for phase
noise channels, even when the likeihood can be computed, lies in the number of points to be
inspected which is exponentially large in nr , nt . The problem is that computing the likelihood at
any given point does not give us any information about the structure of f , and does not help in
maximizing f efficiently.
C. Non-concavity in the high SNR regime
Indeed maximizing f is difficult, and it seems that even performing zero-forcing, i.e., maximizing f over x ∈ Cnt rather than over x ∈ X nt , is difficult since f is non-concave, at least
in the high SNR regime. We first show that, in the high SNR regime, the log-likelihood can be
approximated by a function of the minimal value of kyy − Hθ xk2 , where the minimum is taken
over all possible phases θ .
August 9, 2017
DRAFT
15
Lemma 1. For all x, y , H , Qθ , we have the following high SNR behavior
1
x, y , H , γ, Q θ ) = m(x
x, y , H ) := min kyy − Hθ x k2 .
lim − f (x
θ ∈Rnt +nr
γ
(37)
γ→∞
Proof. Consider > 0, we have that
1 kyy − HΘ x k2 ≤ m(xx, y , H ) + e−γ(m(xx,yy ,HH )+) ≤ e−γkyy −HHΘ xk ≤ e−γm(xx,yy ,HH ) .
2
(38)
Taking expectations and then logarithms:
n
o 1
1
2
x, y , H )+)+ ln P kyy −H
HΘx k ≤ m(x
x, y , H )+ ≤ f (x
x, y , H , γ, Q θ ) ≤ −m(x
x, y , H ).
−(m(x
γ
γ
Since the mapping θ 7→ kyy − Hθ x k2 is continuous, for any given > 0, the probability
x, y , H ) + is strictly positive. Letting γ → ∞, we have
P kyy − HΘ x k2 ≤ m(x
1
1
x, y , H , γ, Q θ ) ≤ lim sup f (x
x, y , H , γ, Q θ ) ≤ −m(x
x, y , H ).
x, y , H ) + ) ≤ lim inf f (x
−(m(x
γ→∞
γ→∞
γ
γ
x, y , H , γ, Q θ ) = m(x
x, y , H ).
Since the above holds for all > 0, we have limγ→∞ − γ1 f (x
We can now show that in general the log-likelihood is not concave, hence maximizing it is
not straightforward.
x, y , H , γ, Q θ )
Proposition 3. For γ large enough and H 6= 0 , there exists y such that x 7→ f (x
is a non-concave function.
Proof. Assume that f is concave, then for all x we must have:
1
x + x∗
∗
x, y , H , γ, Q θ ) + f (x
x , y , H , γ, Q θ ) ≤ f
, y , H , γ, Q θ .
f (x
2
2
(39)
From Lemma 1, the above inequality implies that
1
x + x∗
∗
x, y , H ) + m(x
x , y, H ) ≥ m
m(x
, y, H .
2
2
(40)
We shall construct an example to show that the above does not hold in general. Consider any z
x. Then x and z are
such that H z 6= 0 , and let y = H z and x = j(|z1 |, ..., |znt |), so that x ∗ = −x
x, y , H ) = m(zz , y , H ) = 0. Similarly m(x
x∗ , y , H ) = 0.
equal up to a phase transformation, so m(x
∗
x
By definition m( x +x
, y , H ) = m(00, y , H ) = kyy k2 . In this example, (40) would imply 0 ≥ kyy k2 ,
2
which is clearly a contradiction since y 6= 0 . Hence f cannot be concave for γ large enough.
This fact that the log-likelihood is in general non-concave gives another important insight:
SIW can in fact be seen as a (well chosen) concave approximation of a non-concave function.
To circumvent the problem of non-concavity of the log-likelihood SIW approximates it by a
August 9, 2017
DRAFT
16
function which, when Wx is fixed, is concave. As non-concavity appears mainly for high SNRs,
the discrepancy between the performance of ML and SIW (if any) should be more visible in the
high SNR regime, and this will be confirmed by our numerical experiments in the next section.
V. N UMERICAL E XPERIMENTS
In this section, we look at different communication scenarios in which we compare the
proposed scheme to some baseline schemes, including two schemes that ignore the phase noise:
•
The naive LMMSE solution given by (27)
•
The naive ML solution (8)
and a scheme that takes the phase noise into account:
•
Selection between naive LMMSE and ML: the receiver first finds the naive LMMSE and
naive ML solutions, then computes the proposed approximate likelihood function and selects
the one with higher value.
Note that we focus on the vector detection error rate3 as our performance metric.
A. Simulation-based lower bounds
In order to appreciate the performance of the proposed algorithm, we need to compare it
not only with the existing schemes, but also to the fundamental limit given by ML detection,
which is optimal. Let us recall that the proposed SIW algorithm may suffer from two levels of
suboptimality. First, the approximate likelihood function (13) may be inaccurate in some cases.
Second, even if (13) is accurate, the SIW algorithm is not guaranteed to find the optimal solution
(15). Therefore, in order to identify the source of the potential suboptimality, it would be useful
to compare the performance of the SIW scheme with the performance given by (13) and with
that given by (7).
Unfortunately, as pointed out earlier, finding (13) requires an exhaustive search with complexity
growing as |X |nt . Finding (7) is even harder because of the numerical multi-dimensional integration. As such, we resort to lower bounds on the detection error for (13) and (7), respectively,
which are enough for our purpose of benchmarking. To that end, we write
aML
X, Y , H ) < maxn fˆ(x
x, Y , H )
Pe
≥ P fˆ(X
x ∈X
3
t
(41)
The detection is considered successful only when all the symbols in x are recovered correctly. Otherwise an error is declared.
August 9, 2017
DRAFT
17
x, Y , H ) ,
X, Y , H ) < max fˆ(x
≥ P fˆ(X
x ∈L
∀ L ⊆ X nt ,
(42)
where the first lower bound is from the definition of the detection criterion, namely, error occurs
if there exists at least one input vector that has a strictly higher approximate likelihood value.
Note that although the second inequality is valid for all L, it becomes equality if L contains all
the points in X nt that have a higher approximate likelihood value than X does. In this work, we
only take a large set around X to obtain the lower bound (42), without any theoretical guarantee
of tightness of (42). Similarly, for ML detection, we have
ML
X, Y , H ) < maxn f (x
x, Y , H )
Pe ≥ P f (X
x ∈X
(43)
t
X, Y , H ) < f (X
X0 , Y , H )}
≥ P {f (X
X 6= X 0 , f (X
X, Y , H ) < f (X
X0 , Y , H )} ,
= P {X
(44)
∀ X 0 ∈ X nt ,
(45)
where the first lower bound is from the definition of the ML detection criterion, namely, error
occurs if there exists at least one input vector that has a strictly higher likelihood value; the
X, Y , H ) < f (X
X0 , Y , H ); Note that the
equality (45) holds since X 6= X 0 is a consequence of f (X
second lower bound (44) holds for any vector X 0 from the alphabet X nt and with equality when
X 0 is the exact ML solution. Since the ML solution is unknown, we can use any suboptimal
solution instead and still obtain a valid lower bound. Now we can see that (45) is much easier
to evaluate than (43) is since there is no need to perform the maximization over X nt . Intuitively,
if X 0 is a near ML solution, then the lower bound should be tight enough. We shall have some
more discussions on this with the upcoming numerical examples. The lower bound (45) can be
obtained by simulation:
1) For a given observation y and channel H , find a suboptimal solution x 0 .
x, y , H ) and f (x
x0 , y , H ), count an ML error only when f (x
x, y , H ) <
2) If x 0 6= x , compute f (x
x0 , y , H ); otherwise the counter remains unchanged.
f (x
With the proposed method, we need to perform twice the numerical integration (e.g., MonteCarlo integration) only when x 0 6= x . If the latter event happens with small probability, then the
average complexity to evaluate (45) is low. In other words, using a x 0 from a better reference
scheme not only makes the lower bound tighter but also makes it easier to evaluate.
August 9, 2017
DRAFT
18
(a) 64-QAM, PN 3◦ .
(b) 256-QAM, PN 2◦ .
(c) 1024-QAM, PN 1◦ .
Fig. 3: SISO Rayleigh fading with i.i.d. phase noise.
B. Scenario 1: Point-to-point SISO channel
The first scenario focuses on the point-to-point Rayleigh fading single-antenna channels, also
known as single-input single-output (SISO) channels. We consider three different modulation
orders (64, 256, and 1024) with correspondingly three values of phase noise strength (3◦ , 2◦ ,
and 1◦ ) in terms of the standard deviation at both the transmitter and receiver sides. The idea is
to assess the performance of the proposed algorithm in different phase noise limited regimes. In
the SISO case, we compare the proposed scheme with the naive ML scheme which consists in a
simple threshold detection for the real and imaginary parts. Several remarks are in order. First,
we see that ignoring the existance of phase noise incurs a significant performance loss. Second,
if exhaustive search is done with the proposed likelihood approximation, then it achieves the ML
performance. This can be seen from the fact that the proposed simulation-based lower bound
overlaps with the curve with exhaustive search. This confirms the accuracy of the closed-form
approximation (13) at least in the SISO case. It is worth mentioning that the exact likelihood
in this case can also be derived via the Tikhonov distribution as shown in [5], [15] where the
analytic expression involving the Bessel function has been provided. Finally, more remarkably,
the SIW algorithm almost achieves the ML performance without exhaustive search.
C. Scenario 2: Point-to-point LoS-MIMO channel
The second scenario is the point-to-point line-of-sight (LoS) MIMO system commonly deployed as microwave backhaul links [16], [9], [17]. We assume that the channel is constant over
time but each antenna is driven by its own oscillator. This is the worst-case assumption but
also often motivated by the fact that the communication distance is large and thus the distance
August 9, 2017
DRAFT
19
(a) 0.33 Opt. distance, 64-QAM.
(b) 0.7 Opt. distance, 256-QAM.
(c) Opt. distance, 1024-QAM.
Fig. 4: 4 × 4 LoS MIMO. Each antenna has i.i.d. phase noise of standard deviation 1◦ .
between antenna elements is increased accordingly to make sure that the channel matrix is well
conditioned [16], [17]. Here, we adopt the model with two transmit and two receive antennas
each one with dual polarizations. This is effectively a 4×4 MIMO channel. The optimal distance
between the antenna elements at each side can be derived as a function of the communication
distance [16]. However, it may not always be possible to install the antennas with the optimal
spacing due to practical constraints. The condition number of the channel matrix increases when
the antenna spacing decreases away from the optimal distance. In Figure 4, we consider three
configurations with distances 0.33, 0.7, and 1 of the optimal value, generated using the model
from [17]. Accordingly, we use 64-, 256-, and 1024-QAM. For simplicity, we do not consider any
precoding although it may further improve the performance as shown in [17]. We assume that
the phase noises are i.i.d. with standard deviation of 1◦ . We make the following observations.
First, as in the SISO case, phase noise mitigation substantially improves performance. Also,
the proposed likelihood approximation remains accurate as shown by the comparison between
the exhaustive search (15) and the lower bound on ML detection. Further, the proposed SIW
algorithm follows closely the exhaustive search curve and hence achieves near ML performance.
Finally, although in the considered scenario the naive LMMSE is outperformed by the naive ML
scheme, the selection between them can provide a non-negligible gain as shown in Figure 4b.
D. Scenario 3: Uplink SIMO channel with centralized receiver oscillator
The third scenario is the uplink cellular communication channel with four single-antenna
users and one multi-antenna base station receiver. It is assumed that the phase noises at the
users’ side are i.i.d., whereas there is no phase noise at the receiver side. This is a reasonable
August 9, 2017
DRAFT
20
(a) 4 × 4, 64-QAM, PN 4◦ .
(b) 4 × 4, 256-QAM, PN 2◦ .
(c) 4 × 10, 256-QAM, PN 2◦ .
Fig. 5: Uplink SIMO channel. Four single-antenna users with i.i.d. phase noise, multi-antenna
receiver without phase noise.
assumption since the oscillators at the base station are usually of higher quality than those used
by mobile devices. We assume i.i.d. Rayleigh fading in this scenario where three configurations
are considered, as shown in Figure 5. Unlike in the previous scenarios, the naive ML is dominated
by the naive LMMSE at high SNR. This somewhat counter-intuitive observation can be explained
as follows. Without receiver phase noise, the channel can be inverted and we obtain a spatial
parallel channel. Although channel inversion incurs some power loss when the channel is not
orthogonal, each of the resulting parallel subchannels sees an independent phase noise. Therefore,
the demodulation only suffers from a scalar self-interference. On the other hand, with naive ML
the receiver tries to find the closest vector in the image space of H to the received vector y .
Since the linear map H mixes the perturbation of the different transmit phase noises, the naive
ML detection, ignoring the presence of phase noise, suffers from the aggregated perturbation
from all the phase noises. That is why the naive LMMSE can be better than the naive ML
scheme in the high SNR regime where phase noise dominates the additive noise. In the case
when both the transmitter and the receiver have comparable phase noises, such a phenomenon
is rarely observed since the channel inversion also increases the perturbation with the presence
of receiver phase noises.
From Figure 5, we remark that as before the proposed SIW scheme is superior to the other
schemes. With a relatively strong phase noise of 4◦ , the error rate of SIW is 3 to 4 times lower
than that of the naive schemes and is at most twice that of the ML lower bound. With a smaller
phase noise of 2◦ , the SIW scheme can support 256-QAM with four receive antennas, achieving
an error rate 5 times lower than that of the naive schemes. In Figure 5c, we increase the number
August 9, 2017
DRAFT
21
Fig. 6: Uniform phase noise at both transmitter and receiver, Rayleigh fading.
of receive antennas to 10, we see that the gap between the naive schemes is decreased due to the
increased orthogonality of the channel. Nevertheless, the gap between the naive schemes and the
proposed scheme does not decrease since the orthogonality between the users does not reduce
the impact of the phase noise from the transmitter side. We could expect the same observation
even with massive MIMO. Nevertheless, with massive MIMO uplink, the receiver phase noise
can be mitigated substantially due to the asymptotic orthogonality [18].
VI. F URTHER D ISCUSSION AND E XPERIMENTS
A. Robustness to the phase noise distribution
One of the main assumptions of our work is that the phase noise follows a Gaussian distribution. Indeed, our derivation of the closed-form approximation (13) depends on this assumption.
We have seen that this approximation is very accurate in various practical scenarios with Gaussian
phase noise. In practice, however, phase noises may not be Gaussian, which leads to the following
natural question on the robustness: Does the proposed algorithm still work when the phase noise
is not Gaussian? The answer turns out to be positive when we let the phase noise be uniformly
distributed. In Figure 6, we consider three previous configurations (shown in Figure 3c, 5a, and
5b, respectively) but with uniform phase noises. From the results, we see that the proposed
algorithm works well as in the Gaussian phase noise, especially when the phase noise is small.
In fact, we believe that the phase noise distribution with certain regularity (e.g., continuous and
August 9, 2017
DRAFT
22
Fig. 7: Impact of iterations.
bounded density) should not have great impact on the performance of the proposed algorithm
when the phase noise is not too strong.
B. Further improvement with more iterations
Although the proposed scheme achieves near ML performance in many cases, there is still
room for improvement in some situations. As shown in Figure 5 for the 4 × 4 channel with 64QAM, the error floor of the proposed scheme is three times higher than the one of the exhaustive
search. In order to reduce the error floor, we propose to introduce a list of candidate solutions
by iteration. We recall that in the SIW scheme we start from the best solution between naive ZF
and naive ML, and we use this solution as a starting point to estimate the matrix W x followed
by a nearest neighbor detection. The SIW algorithm replaces the starting point with the newly
found one if the latter has a higher approximated likelihood. We can extend the SIW algorithm
with more iterations. Specifically, we can fix a maximum number of iterations. As long as the
newly found point is not inside the list, it should be added to the list and we continue to iterate.
The procedure stops either when we hit the maximum number of iterations or we find a point
already inside the list. At the end, we select the point with the highest likelihood value from the
list.
August 9, 2017
DRAFT
23
C. Potential issues in the very high SNR regime
At very high SNR, the proposed approximation (13) may become less accurate and the perforHΘ x k
mance loss increases with SNR. It can be seen from (6) that the approximation error of kyy −H
has greater impact as γ grows. Numerical experiments show that such performance loss may
be apparent for SNR higher than 40dB depending on the constellation size. A straightforward
workaround is to impose a ceiling value of the SNR γmax for the decoder. In other words, for
SNR higher than the threshold γmax , we let the decoder work as if it were at γmax . Intuitively,
the probability of error cannot be larger than the one at γmax , since we are feeding less noisy
observations to the decoder than what they are supposed to be. With the decoding function, the
observation space can be partitioned into |X |nt regions, each one of which corresponds to a
vector in X nt . The probability of decoding error is the probability that the observation is outside
of the decoding region corresponding to the actual input. With a smaller variance of AWGN, the
observation has a higher probability to be inside the region, hence a lower probability of error.
Nevertheless, the formal proof of this argument is not trivial, and is outside of the scope of the
current paper.4
Another issue at very high SNR is that the likelihood may be too small as compared to the
finite numerical precision. Therefore, it becomes impossible to obtain the simulation-based lower
bound in a reliable way. Furthermore, the number of Monte-Carlo samples required to reach any
given accuracy grows with the SNR.
D. On the practical validity of the adopted discrete-time model
The discrete-time channel model (1) that we adopt in this work is a simplification of the
waveform phase noise channel. Indeed, the discrete-time output sequence is obtained from
filtering followed by sampling in most communication systems. Filtering a waveform corrupted
by phase noise results in not only phase perturbation but also amplitude variation [19]. In the
following, we shall show that the amplitude variation is negligible in the practical regime of
interest. For simplicity, we focus on the single-antenna case with a rectangular filter (i.e., an
integrator). We adhere to the commonly accepted Wiener model for the continuous-time phase
4
We can always add an artificial noise to the observation in order to reduce the SNR to γmax before the detection. In this
way we have an error floor for SNR beyond γmax .
August 9, 2017
DRAFT
24
noise process {Θ(t)}. In particular, Θ(t) ∼ N (0, βt). The equivalent filtered channel gain for
the k th symbol interval of duration T is
Z
Z
1 (k+1)T jΘ(t) d jΘ(kT ) 1 T jΘ(t)
e
dt = e
e
dt
T kT
T 0
(46)
d
from the property of a Wiener process where = means equality in distribution. Assuming that
we can somehow track the past state Θ(kT ) perfectly, we now focus on the following random
variable due to the residual phase noise corresponding to the innovation part:
Z
1 T jΘ(t)
e
dt
B(β, T ) :=
T 0
Z βT
d 1
=
ej Θ̃(t) dt
βT 0
d
= B(1, βT )
(47)
(48)
(49)
d
where in (48) follows from Θ(t) = Θ̃(βt) for some normalized Wiener process {Θ̃(t)} with
Θ̃(t) ∼ N (0, t). We notice that the random variable B(β, T ) depends on the parameters β
and T only through the product βT . The distribution of B(β, T ) has been characterized both
approximately [19] and exactly [20]. In particular, an approximate moment-generating function
has been derived in [19] for small phase noise. We can use the results therein to obtain the
following characterization.
Proposition 4. Let us consider the polar representation B(β, T ) = GejΦ with G ≥ 0 and
Φ ∈ [−π, π). When S := βT is small, we have
S
S2
,
Var (Φ) ≈ , Var (G) ≈
3
180
and thus,
2
1
Var (G) ≈
Var (Φ) .
20
(50)
(51)
In Figure 8, we compare the approximation given by (51) to the correct value obtained
numerically. The approximation (51) is surprisingly accurate even for a standard deviation of
20◦ for the phase. More importantly, such results show that for a small phase perturbation up
to 5 degrees – this is the regime of interest in the present work – the amplitude variation is
less than −55 dB. Therefore, the interference caused by the amplitude variation is dominated
by the AWGN and can be treated as noise without any performance loss. In other words, the
discrete-time model adopted in this work – ignoring the amplitude variation – is indeed valid
for phase noise with moderate variance.
August 9, 2017
DRAFT
25
Fig. 8: Amplitude vs phase perturbation for filtered channel gain.
E. Constellation design
The purpose of the current work is to design a detector that takes into account the phase
perturbation for existing systems in which typical QAM signaling is used. As we observe from the
numerical experiments, in some of the scenarios, even the lower bound on the ML detection error
exhibits an error floor. The error floor is however not a fundamental limit of either the detector or
the channel. With a carefully designed signaling scheme, the probability of ML detection error
can be arbitrarily small with an increasing SNR. For instance, if we use amplitude modulation,
then when the SNR grows, the amplitude ambiguity decreases and the detection error vanishes.
The cost of such an extreme scheme is a reduced spectral efficiency. Algorithms to design a
constellation based on the statistics of both the additive and phase noises have been proposed in
the literature (see [5], [21] and the references therein). To the best of the authors’ knowledge,
only SISO has been considered so far. In the MIMO case, such constellations can still be used
and should provide improvements over QAM. The difficulty with non-QAM constellation lies
in the MIMO detection part, since efficient NND algorithms cannot be applied directly. The
constellation design problem for MIMO phase noise channels is a challenging and interesting
problem in its own right, which is however out of the scope of the current work.
VII. C ONCLUSIONS
In this work, we have studied the ML detection problem for uncoded MIMO phase noise
channels. We have proposed an approximation of the likelihood function that has been shown
August 9, 2017
DRAFT
26
to be accurate in the regimes of practical interest. More importantly, thanks to the geometric
interpretation of the approximate likelihood function, we have designed a simple algorithm that
can solve approximately the optimization problem with only two nearest neighbor detections.
Numerical experiments show that the proposed algorithm can greatly mitigate the impact of
phase noises in different communication scenarios.
R EFERENCES
[1] E. Agrell, T. Eriksson, A. Vardy, and K. Zeger, “Closest point search in lattices,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 48, no. 8,
pp. 2201–2214, Aug. 2002.
[2] E. Viterbo and J. Boutros, “A universal lattice code decoder for fading channel,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 45, no. 10,
pp. 1639–1642, Jul. 1999.
[3] B. Hassibi and H. Vikalo, “On the sphere-decoding algorithm I. Expected complexity,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process.,
vol. 53, no. 8, pp. 2806– 2818, Aug. 2005.
[4] J. Jaldén and P. Elia, “DMT optimality of LR-aided linear decoders for a general class of channels, lattice designs, and
system models,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 56, no. 10, pp. 4765–4780, Oct. 2010.
[5] G. J. Foschini, R. D. Gitlin, and S. B. Weinstein, “On the selection of a two-dimensional signal constellation in the presence
of phase jitter and gaussian noise,” Bell Labs Technical Journal, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 927–965, 1973.
[6] A. Hajimiri and T. H. Lee, “A general theory of phase noise in electrical oscillators,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits,
vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 179–194, Feb. 1998.
[7] H. Ghozlan and G. Kramer, “Models and information rates for wiener phase noise channels,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory,
vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 2376–2393, Apr. 2017.
[8] A. Demir, A. Mehrotra, and J. Roychowdhury, “Phase noise in oscillators: A unifying theory and numerical methods for
characterization,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Fundamental Theory and Applications, vol. 47, no. 5, pp.
655–674, May 2000.
[9] G. Durisi, A. Tarable, C. Camarda, R. Devassy, and G. Montorsi, “Capacity bounds for MIMO microwave backhaul links
affected by phase noise,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 920–929, Mar. 2014.
[10] S. Yang and S. Shamai (Shitz), “On the multiplexing gain of discrete-time MIMO phase noise channels,” IEEE Trans. Inf.
Theory, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 2394–2408, Apr. 2017.
[11] R. Krishnan, G. Colavolpe, A. G. i Amat, and T. Eriksson, “Algorithms for joint phase estimation and decoding for MIMO
systems in the presence of phase noise and quasi-static fading channels,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 63, no. 13, pp.
3360–3375, July 2015.
[12] T. Datta and S. Yang, “Improving MIMO detection performance in presence of phase noise using norm difference criterion,”
in 53rd Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton), Sep. 2015, pp. 286–292.
[13] H. Mehrpouyan, A. A. Nasir, S. D. Blostein, T. Eriksson, G. K. Karagiannidis, and T. Svensson, “Joint estimation of
channel and oscillator phase noise in MIMO systems,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 60, no. 9, pp. 4790–4807, Sep.
2012.
[14] G. W. Oehlert, “A note on the delta method,” The American Statistician, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 27–29, 1992.
[15] G. Colavolpe, A. Barbieri, and G. Caire, “Algorithms for iterative decoding in the presence of strong phase noise,” IEEE
J. Select. Areas Commun., vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 1748–1757, Sep. 2005.
August 9, 2017
DRAFT
27
[16] F. Bøhagen, P. Orten, and G. E. Øien, “Design of optimal high-rank line-of-sight MIMO channels,” IEEE Trans. Wireless
Commun., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1420–1425, Apr. 2007.
[17] P. Ferrand and S. Yang, “Blind precoding in line-of-sight MIMO channels,” in IEEE SPAWC, Edinburgh, UK, 2016.
[18] E. Björnson, J. Hoydis, M. Kountouris, and M. Debbah, “Massive MIMO systems with non-ideal hardware: Energy
efficiency, estimation, and capacity limits,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 60, no. 11, pp. 7112–7139, Nov. 2014.
[19] G. J. Foschini and G. Vannucci, “Characterizing filtered light waves corrupted by phase noise,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory,
vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 1437–1448, Jun. 1988.
[20] Y. Wang, Y. Zhou, D. K. Maslen, and G. S. Chirikjian, “Solving phase-noise Fokker-Planck equations using the motiongroup Fourier transform,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 868–877, May 2006.
[21] R. Krishnan, A. G. i Amat, T. Eriksson, and G. Colavolpe, “Constellation optimization in the presence of strong phase
noise,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 61, no. 12, pp. 5056–5066, Dec. 2013.
A PPENDIX
A. Proof of Proposition 2
ΛRHΛ T − H )X
X so that R2 = kV
V + Z k2 . We have:
Define the vector V := (Λ
V k2 + kZ
Z k2 + Z H V + V H Z
R2 = kV
(52)
V k2 + kZ
Zk2 )2 + (Z
ZH V + V H Z )2 + 2(kV
V k2 + kZ
Zk2 )2 (Z
ZH V + V H Z ).
R4 = (kV
(53)
Using the fact that V and Z are independent and Z has i.i.d. CN (0, γ −1 ) entries, we verify that
V k2 + E kZ
Z k2 ,
E R2 = E kV
V k4 + E kZ
Zk4 + 2E kZ
Zk2 E kV
V k2 + 2γ −1 kV
V k2 ,
E R4 = E kV
V k2 ) + Var(kZ
Zk2 ) + 2γ −1 EkV
V k2 .
Var(R2 ) = Var(kV
(54)
(55)
(56)
Zk2 ] = nr γ −1 and Var(kZ
Zk2 ) = 2nr γ −2 , it follows that
Since E [kZ
V k2 + γ −1 nr ,
E R2 = E kV
(57)
V k2 ) + 2γ −2 nr + 2γ −1 E kV
V k2 .
Var(R4 ) = Var(kV
(58)
V k2 .
We now calculate the moments of kV
Expectation over H : Let us define Ak,l := Xl (ej(Θt,l +Θr,k ) − 1) and write, conditional on A ,
2
Vk =
kV
nt
nr X
X
k=1
August 9, 2017
l=1
2
Hk,l Ak,l
d
=
nr
X
Ek ,
(59)
k=1
DRAFT
28
Ak k2 ) with Ak := [Ak,l ]l=1,...,nt , k = 1, . . . , nr ; we used the fact that H has
where Ek ∼ Exp(1/kA
V k2 for a given
i.i.d. CN (0, 1) entries. Then we can calculate the first and second moments of kV
A = [Aj,k ]j,k :
2
Vk ] =
EH |AA [kV
nr
X
EH |AA [Ek ] =
k=1
nt
nr X
X
|Ak,l |2 ,
"
V k4 = EH |AA
EH |AA kV
nr
X
#
E2k + EH |AA
k=1
=
nr
X
(60)
k=1 l=1
A k k4 +
2kA
k=1
nt
nt X
X
k0 =1
k0 6=k
nt X
nt
X
k0 =1
k0 6=k
Ek Ek0
(61)
k=1
Ak k2 kA
A k 0 k2
kA
(62)
k=1
nr X
nr
X
Ak k2 kA
Ak0 k2 .
(1 + 1{k = k 0 })kA
=
(63)
k0 =1 k=1
Moments of A : We recall that |Ak,l |2 = 2|Xl |2 (1 − cos(Θr,k + Θt,l )). We have that E |Xl |2 =
1 and define E |Xl |4 = P̄ 2 , for l = 1, . . . , nt . Using the independence and the identity
for zero-mean Gaussian Θ, we obtain
E [cos(Θ)] = exp − Var(Θ)
2
σ 2 +σ 2
2
2
− r2 t
E |Ak,l | = 2E |Xl | E [1 − cos(Θt,l + Θr,k )] = 2 1 − e
.
(64)
We now calculate the correlation between the entries of A
E(|Ak,l |2 |Ak0 ,l0 |2 ) = 4E(|Xl |2 |Xl0 |2 ) ρk,k,0 l,l0
(65)
with
ρk,k,0 l,l0 := E((1 − cos(Θt,l + Θr,k ))(1 − cos(Θt,l0 + Θr,k0 )))
σ 2 +σ 2
− r2 t
= 1 − 2e
+ e−σr −σt cosh(σr2 (1{k = k 0 } + σt2 1{l = l0 })),
2
2
(66)
(67)
where to obtain the last equality we use the trigonometric identities and again apply the identity
x
−x
E [cos(Θ)] = exp − Var(Θ)
; we recall that cosh(x) = e +e
.
2
2
V k2 : From (60) and (64), we have the first moment
Moments of kV
nt
nr X
σ 2 +σ 2
X
2
2
− r2 t
Vk =
E kV
E |Ak,l | = nt nr 2 1 − e
.
(68)
k=1 l=1
August 9, 2017
DRAFT
29
For the variance, we apply (63) and (68)
2
V k2
V k4 − E kV
V k2 = E kV
(69)
Var kV
nt
nt X
nr X
nr X
X
2
2
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
E |Ak,l | |Ak ,l | (1 + 1{k = k }) − E |Ak,l | E |Ak ,l | .
=
k0 =1 k=1 l0 =1 l=1
(70)
Noting that E [|Ak,l |2 |Ak0 ,l0 |2 ] = E [|Ak,l |2 ] E [|Ak0 ,l0 |2 ] if k 6= k 0 and l 6= l0 , we obtain the variance
V k2 ) = 4nt nr w1 + w2 (nt − 1) + w3 (nr − 1) ,
Var(kV
(71)
where w1 , w2 , w3 > 0 do not depend on nt , nr and correspond to the cases (k = k 0 , l = l0 ),
(k = k 0 , l 6= l0 ), (k 6= k 0 , l = l0 ), respectively, in the summation (70),
2
2
2
w1 := 2P̄ 2 (1 − 2e−σ + e−2σ cosh(2σ 2 )) − (1 − e−σ )2 ,
2
2
2
w2 := 2(1 − 2e−σ + e−2σ cosh(σr2 )) − (1 − e−σ )2 ,
2
2
2
w3 := P̄ 2 (1 − 2e−σ + e−2σ cosh(σt2 )) − (1 − e−σ )2 ,
where we define σ 2 :=
(72)
(73)
(74)
σt2 +σr2
.
2
Putting it together: From (54) and (68), we have
2 +σ 2
σr
t
V k2 + γ −1 nr = nt nr 2 1 − e− 2
+ γ −1 nr ,
E R2 = E kV
(75)
which yields the first result. Note that E [R2 ] ≥ c1 nt nr for some constant c1 > 0 with respect to
(nt , nr ). From (56) and (71), we have proven that there exists a constant c2 > 0 such that
V k2 ) + 2γ −2 nr + 2γ −1 E kV
V k2 ≤ c2 nr nt (nt + nr ).
Var(R2 ) = Var(kV
(76)
Hence
Var(R2 )
c2
≤
(E [R2 ])2
c21
1
1
+
nr nt
→ 0,
nt , nr → ∞,
(77)
and applying Chebychev’s inequality yields the second result:
P (1 − η)E R2 ≤ R2 ≤ (1 + η)E R2 → 1, nt , nr → ∞.
August 9, 2017
(78)
DRAFT
30
B. Proof of Proposition 4
From [19, eq.6]5 , we can derive the moment-generating function (MGF) of (G, Φ)
1
MG,Φ (ξ, η) = eξ sinhc− 2
p
Sξ
"
##
"
r ! −1
p
Sξ
Sξ
Sη 2
cothc
−
+ tanhc
Sξ
, (79)
· exp
8
4
4
where we define sinhc(x) :=
sinh(x)
,
x
coth(x)
,
x
cothc(x) :=
tanhc(x) :=
tanh(x)
,
x
and recall that
S := βT . It follows that the MGF of G and Φ are
p
MG (ξ) = MG,Φ (ξ, 0) = e sinhc
Sξ ,
1 2
Sη ,
MΦ (η) = MG,Φ (0, η) = exp
6
ξ
− 12
(80)
(81)
where we used the fact that, when x → 0, sinhc(x) = 1 + O(x2 ), tanhc(x) = 1 + O(x2 ), and
cothc(x) −
1
1
= + O(x2 ).
2
x
3
(82)
After finding the first and second derivatives of both MGF (80) and (81) with some elementary
manipulations, we obtain the desired variances
S2
2
Var (G) = E G2 − (E (G))2 = MG00 (0) − (MG0 (0)) =
,
180
S
2
Var (Φ) = E Φ2 − (E (Φ))2 = MΦ00 (0) − (MΦ0 (0)) = .
3
(83)
(84)
Note that we use approximate equality in (50) and (51) since the MGF derived in [19] is indeed
approximative with the assumption of small S.
5
Note that the random variable B in (47) differs with the one in [19, eq.1] in a normalization factor T . The MGF has been
scaled accordingly.
August 9, 2017
DRAFT
| 7cs.IT
|
1
A unifying energy-based approach to stability of
power grids with market dynamics
arXiv:1604.05200v2 [math.OC] 27 Jul 2016
Tjerk Stegink, Claudio De Persis, Member, IEEE, and Arjan van der Schaft, Fellow, IEEE
Abstract—In this paper a unifying energy-based approach
is provided to the modeling and stability analysis of power
systems coupled with market dynamics. We consider a standard
model of the power network with a third-order model for the
synchronous generators involving voltage dynamics. By applying
the primal-dual gradient method to a social welfare optimization,
a distributed dynamic pricing algorithm is obtained, which can
be naturally formulated in port-Hamiltonian form. By interconnection with the physical model a closed-loop port-Hamiltonian
system is obtained, whose properties are exploited to prove
asymptotic stability to the set of optimal points. This result is
extended to the case that also general nodal power constraints are
included into the social welfare problem. Additionally, the case of
line congestion and power transmission costs in acyclic networks
is covered. Finally, a dynamic pricing algorithm is proposed that
does not require knowledge about the power supply and demand.
Index Terms—port-Hamiltonian, frequency regulation, optimal
power dispatch, dynamic pricing, social welfare, distributed
control, convex optimization.
I. I NTRODUCTION
P
ROVISIONING energy has become increasingly complicated due to several reasons, including the increased share
of renewables. As a result, the generators operate more often
near their capacity limits and transmission line congestion
occurs more frequently.
One effective approach to alleviate some of these challenges
is to use real-time dynamic pricing as a control method
[1]. This feedback mechanism can be used to encourage the
consumers to change their usage when in some parts of the
grid (control areas) it is difficult for the generators and the
network to match the demand.
Real-time dynamic pricing also allows producers and consumers to fairly share utilities and costs associated with the
generation and consumption of energy among the different
control areas. The challenge of achieving this in an optimal
manner while the grid operates within its capacity limits, is
called the social welfare problem [2], [3].
Many of the existing dynamic pricing algorithms focus on
the economic part of optimal supply-demand matching [2],
[4]. However, if market mechanisms are used to determine
the optimal power dispatch (with near real-time updates of
This work is supported by the NWO (Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research) programme Uncertainty Reduction in Smart Energy Systems
(URSES).
T.W. Stegink and C. De Persis are with the Engineering and Technology
institute Groningen (ENTEG), University of Groningen, 9747 AG Groningen,
the Netherlands. {t.w.stegink, c.de.persis}@rug.nl
A.J. van der Schaft is with the Johann Bernoulli Institute for Mathematics
and Computer Science, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 9, 9747 AG
Groningen, the Netherlands. [email protected]
the dispatch commands) dynamic coupling occurs between
the market update process and the physical response of the
physical power network dynamics [5].
Consequently, under the assumption of market-based dispatch, it is essential to consider the stability of the coupled
system incorporating both market operation and electromechanical power system dynamics simultaneously.
While on this subject a vast literature is already available,
the aim of this paper is to provide a rigorous and unifying
passivity-based stability analysis. We focus on a more accurate
and higher order model for the physical power network than
conventionally used in the literature. In particular, we use a
third-order model for the synchronous generators including
voltage dynamics. As a result, market dynamics, frequency dynamics and voltage dynamics are considered simultaneously.
Finally, we propose variations of the basic controller design
that, among other things, allow the incorporation of capacity
constraints on the generation and demand of power and on
the transmission lines, and enhance the transient dynamics of
the closed-loop system. The approach taken in this paper is to
model both the dynamic pricing controller as well as the physical network in a port-Hamiltonian way, emphasizing energy
storage and power flow. This provides a unified framework for
the modeling, analysis and control of power networks with
market dynamics, with possible extensions to more refined
models of the physical power network, including for example
turbine dynamics.
A. Literature review
The coupling between a high-order dynamic power network
and market dynamics has been studied before in [5]. Here
a fourth-order model of the synchronous generator is used
in conjunction with turbine and exciter dynamics, which is
coupled to a simple model describing the market dynamics.
The results established in [5] are based on an eigenvalue
analysis of the linearized system.
It is shown in [6] that the third-order model (often called the
flux-decay model) for describing the power network, as used
in the present paper, admits a useful passivity property that
allows for a rigorous stability analysis of the interconnection
with optimal power dispatch controllers, even in the presence
of time-varying demand.
A common way to solve a general optimization problem
like the social welfare problem is by applying the primaldual gradient method [7], [8], [9]. Also in power grids this
is a commonly used approach to design optimal distributed
controllers, see e.g. [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15]. The
2
problem formulations vary in these papers, with the focus
being on either the generation side [10], [12], the load side
[11], [16], [17] or both [13], [14], [18], [15]. We will elaborate
on these references in the following two paragraphs.
A vast literature focuses on linear power system models
coupled with gradient-method-based controllers [10], [12],
[11], [17], [13], [19]. In these references the property that
the linear power system dynamics can be formulated as a
gradient method applied to a certain optimization problem is
exploited. This is commonly referred to as reverse-engineering
of the power system dynamics [13], [10], [12]. However, this
approach falls short in dealing with models involving nonlinear
power flows.
Nevertheless, [14], [18], [15], [16] show the possibility to
achieve optimal power dispatch in power networks with nonlinear power flows using gradient-method-based controllers.
On the other hand, the controllers proposed in [14], [18], [15]
have restrictions in assigning the controller parameters and in
addition require that the topology of the physical network is
a tree.
B. Main contributions
The contribution of this paper is to propose a novel energybased approach to the problem that differs substantially from
the aforementioned works. We proceed along the lines of
[20], [21], where a port-Hamiltonian approach to the design
of gradient-method-based controllers in power networks is
proposed. In those papers it is shown that both the power
network as well as the controller designs admit a portHamiltonian representation which are then interconnected to
obtain a closed-loop port-Hamiltonian system.
After showing that the third-order dynamical model describing the power network admits a port-Hamiltonian representation, we provide a systematic method to design gradientmethod-based controllers that is able to balance power supply
and demand while maximizing the social welfare at steady
state. This design is carried out first by establishing the optimality conditions associated with the social welfare problem.
Then the continuous-time gradient method is applied to obtain
the port-Hamiltonian form of the dynamic pricing controller.
Then, following [20], [21], the market dynamics is coupled to
the physical power network in a power-preserving manner so
that all the trajectories of the closed-loop system converge
to the desired synchronous solution and to optimal power
dispatch.
Although the proposed controllers share similarities with
others presented in the literature, the way in which they are
interconnected to the physical network, which is based on
passivity, is to the best of our knowledge new. Moreover, they
show several advantages.
1) Physical model: Since our approach is based on passivity and does not require to reverse-engineer the power system
dynamics as a primal-dual gradient dynamics, it allows to deal
with more complex nonlinear models of the power network.
More specifically, the physical model for describing the power
network in this paper admits nonlinear power flows and timevarying voltages, and is more accurate and reliable than the
classical second-order model [22], [23], [24].
In addition, most of the results that are established in the
present paper are valid for the case of nonlinear power flows
and cyclic networks, in contrast to e.g. [13], [10], [12], [19],
[19], where the power flows are linearized and e.g. [15], [18],
[14] where the physical network topology is a tree. Moreover,
in the aforementioned references the voltages are assumed
to be constant. While the third-order model for the power
network as considered in this paper has been studied before
using passivity based techniques [6], the combination with
gradient method based controllers is novel. In addition, the
stability analysis does not rely on linearization and is based on
energy functions which allow us to establish rigorous stability
results.
2) State transformation: In [10], [12] it is shown how a
state transformation of the closed-loop system can be used to
eliminate the information about the demand from the controller
dynamics, which improves implementation of the resulting
controller. We pursue this idea and show that the same kind
of state transformation can also be used for more complex
physical models as considered in this paper. This avoids the
requirement of knowing the demand to determine the market
price.
3) Controller parameters: In the present paper we show
that both the physical power network as well as the dynamic
pricing controllers admit a port-Hamiltonian representation,
and in particular are passive systems. As a result, the interconnection between the controller and the nonlinear power
system is power-preserving, implying passivity of the closedloop system as well. Consequently, we do not have to impose
any condition on controller design parameters for guaranteeing
asymptotic stability, contrary to [14], [18], [15].
4) Port-Hamiltonian framework: Because of the use of the
port-Hamiltonian framework, the proposed controller designs
have the potential to deal with more complex models for
the power network compared to the model described in this
paper. As long as the more complex model remains portHamiltonian, the results continue to be valid. This may lead
to inclusion of, for example, turbine dynamics or automatic
voltage regulators in the analysis, although this is beyond the
scope of the present paper. Furthermore, higher order models
for the synchronous generator could be considered.
In addition, we propose various extensions to the basic controller design that have not been investigated in the aforementioned references.
5) Transmission costs: In addition to nodal power constraints and line congestion, we also consider the possibility
of including power transmission costs into the social welfare
problem. Including such costs may in particular be useful in
reducing energy losses or the risk of a breakdown of certain
transmission lines.
6) Non-strict convex objective functions: By relaxing the
conditions on the objective function, we show that also nonstrict convex/concave cost/utility functions can be considered
respectively. In addition, the proposed technique allows to add
damping in the gradient method based controller which may
improve the convergence rate of the closed-loop system.
3
7) Barrier functions: We highlight the possibility to use
barrier functions to enforce the trajectories to stay withing the
feasible region, which allows operation within the capacity
constraints for all time, even during transients. This permits a
more realistic application of the proposed controller design.
The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. In
Section II the preliminaries are stated. Then the basic dynamic
pricing algorithm is discussed in Section III and convergence
of the closed-loop system is proven. Variations of the basic
controller design are discussed in Section IV where in Section
IV-A nodal power congestion is included into the social
welfare problem, and in Section IV-B the case line congestion
for the acyclic power networks is discussed. A dynamic pricing
algorithm is proposed in Section IV-C which does not require
knowledge about the power supply and demand. In Section
IV-D the possibility to relax the convexity assumption and
to improve the transient dynamics of the basic controller is
discussed. Finally, the conclusions and suggestions for future
research are discussed in Section V.
II. P RELIMINARIES
A. Notation
Given a symmetric matrix A ∈ Rn×n , we write A > 0 (A ≥
0) to indicate that A is a positive (semi-)definite matrix. The
set of positive real numbers is denoted by R>0 and likewise
the set of vectors in Rn whose elements are positive by Rn>0 .
We write A∨B to indicate that either condition A or condition
B holds, e.g., a > 0 ∨ b > 0 means that either a > 0 or b > 0
holds. Given v ∈ Rn then v 0 denotes the element-wise
inequality. The notation 1 ∈ Rn is used for the vector whose
elements are equal to 1. Given a twice-differentiable function
f : Rn → Rn then the Hessian of f evaluated at x is denoted
by ∇2 f (x). Given a vector η ∈ Rm , we denote by sin η ∈ Rm
the element-wise sine function. Given a differentiable function
f (x1 , x2 ), x1 ∈ Rn1 , x2 ∈ Rn2 then ∇f (x1 , x2 ) denotes the
gradient of f with respect to x1 , x2 evaluated at x1 , x2 and
likewise ∇x1 f (x1 , x2 ) denotes the gradient of f with respect
to x1 . Given a solution x of ẋ = f (x), where f : Rn → Rn
is a Lebesgue measurable function and locally bounded, the
omega-limit set Ω(x) is defined as [25]
n
Ω(x) := x̄ ∈ Rn | ∃{tk }∞
k=1 ⊂ [0, ∞)
o
with lim tk = ∞ and lim x(tk ) = x̄ .
k→∞
are arbitrary labeled with a ‘+’ and a ‘-’, so that the incidence
matrix D of the resulting directed graph is given by
Dik
Each bus represents a control area and is assumed to have a
controllable power supply and demand. The dynamics at each
bus is assumed to be given by [22], [6]
δ̇i = ωi
Mi ω̇i = −
0
0
Bij Eqi
Eqj
sin δij − Ai ωi + Pgi − Pdi
0
0
= Ef i − (1 − (Xdi − Xdi
)Bii )Eqi
X
0
0
− (Xdi − Xdi
)
Bij Eqj
cos δij ,
(1)
j∈Ni
which is commonly referred to as the flux-decay model. Here
we use a similar notation as used in established literature on
power systems [22], [23], [26], [24]. See Table I for a list of
symbols used in the model (1) and throughout the paper.
δi
ωib
ωn
ωi
0
Eqi
Ef i
Pdi
Pgi
Mi
Ni
Ai
Bij
Bii
Xdi
0
Xdi
0
Tdi
Voltage angle
Frequency
Nominal frequency
Frequency deviation ωi := ωib − ω n
q-axis transient internal voltage
Excitation voltage
Power demand
Power generation
Moment of inertia
Set of buses connected to bus i
Asynchronous damping constant
Negative of the susceptance of transmission line (i, j)
Self-susceptance
d-axis synchronous reactance of generator i
d-axis transient reactance of generator i
d-axis open-circuit transient time constant
Table I
PARAMETERS AND STATE VARIABLES OF MODEL (1).
Assumption 1. By using the power network model (1) the
following assumptions are made, which are standard in a broad
range of literature on power network dynamics [22].
•
•
Consider a power grid consisting of n buses. The network is
represented by a connected and undirected graph G = (V, E),
where the nodes, V = {1, ..., n}, is the set of buses and the
edges, E = {1, . . . , m} ⊂ V × V, is the set of transmission
lines connecting the buses. The k-th edge connecting nodes i
and j is denoted as k = (i, j) = (j, i). The ends of edge k
X
j∈Ni
0
0
Tdi
Ėqi
k→∞
B. Power network model
+1 if i is the positive end of edge k
= −1 if i is the negative end of edge k
0
otherwise.
•
Lines are purely inductive, i.e., the conductance is zero.
This assumption is generally valid for the case of high
voltage lines connecting different control areas.
The grid is operating around the synchronous frequency
which implies ωib ≈ ω n for each i ∈ V.
In addition, we assume for simplicity that the excitation
voltage Ef i is constant for all i ∈ V.
Define the voltage angle differences between the buses by
η = DT δ. Further define the angular momenta by p := M ω,
where ω = ω b −1ω n are the (aggregated) frequency deviations
and M = diagi∈V {Mi } are the moments of inertia. Let
0
0
0
0
Γ(Eq0 ) = diagk∈E {γk } and γk = Bij Eqi
Eqj
= Bji Eqi
Eqj
4
where k corresponds to the edge between node i and j. Then
we can write (1) more compactly as [6]
η̇ = DT ω
M ω̇ = −DΓ(Eq0 ) sin η − Aω + Pg − Pd
Td0 Ėq0
=
−F (η)Eq0
(2)
+ Ef
where A = diagi∈V {Ai }, Pg = coli∈V {Pgi }, Pd =
0
0
coli∈V {Pdi }, Td0 = diagi∈V {Tdi
}, Eq0 = coli∈V {Eqi
}, Ef =
coli∈V {Ef i }. For a given η, the components of the matrix
F (η) ∈ Rn×n are defined as
1
0 + Bii ,
Xdi − Xdi
Fij (η) = −Bij cos ηk = Fji (η),
Fii (η) =
i∈V
(3)
k = (i, j) ∈ E
and Fij (η) = 0 otherwise.P
Since for realistic power networks
0
Xdi > Xdi
, and Bii =
j∈Ni Bij > 0 for all i ∈ V, it
follows that F (η) > 0 for all η [22], [23].
Considering the physical energy1 stored in the generator and
the transmission lines respectively, we define the Hamiltonian
as
!
0
2
(E
−
E
)
1X
f
i
qi
Hp =
Mi−1 p2i +
0
2
Xdi − Xdi
i∈V
(4)
1X
0 2
0 2
0
0
+
Bij (Eqi
) + (Eqj
) − 2Eqi
Eqj
cos ηk
2
The assumption η̄ ∈ (−π/2, π/2)m is standard in studies on
power grid stability and is also referred to as a security constraint [6]. In addition, the Hessian condition guarantees the
existence of a local storage function around the equilibrium.
The following result, which establishes decentralized conditions for checking the positive definiteness of the Hessian,
was proven in [28]:
0
Proposition 1. Let Ēqi
∈ Rn>0 and η̄ ∈ (−π/2, π/2)m . If for
all i ∈ V we have
0
X
sin2 η̄k
Eqj
1
+
B
+
B
ii
ij
0
0 cos η̄
Xdi − Xdi
Eqi
k
k=(i,j)∈E
X
Ēqi
>
Bij cos η̄k 1 +
tan2 η̄k > 0
Ēqj
k=(i,j)∈E
then ∇2 Hp (x̄p ) > 0.
It can be verified that the condition stated in Proposition 1 is
satisfied if the following holds [28]:
• the generator reactances are small compared to the transmission line reactances
• the voltage (angle) differences are small.
Remarkably, these conditions hold for a typical operation point
in power transmission networks.
k=(i,j)∈E
where ηk = δi − δj . The first term of the Hamiltonian Hp
represents the shifted kinetic energy stored in the rotors of the
generators and the second term corresponds to the magnetic
energy stored in the generator circuits. Finally, the last term of
Hp corresponds to the magnetic energy stored in the inductive
transmission lines.
By (4), the system (2) can be written in port-Hamiltonian
form [27] as
0 0
0
DT
0
∇Hp + I −I up
0
ẋp = −D −A
0 0
0
0
−Rq
(5)
0 I 0
ω
yp =
∇Hp =
0 −I 0
−ω
where xp = col(η, p, Eq0 ), up = col(Pg , Pd ) and
Rq = (Td0 )−1 (Xd − Xd0 ) > 0,
0
Td0 = diagi∈V {Tdi
} > 0,
0
Xd − Xd0 = diagi∈V {Xdi − Xdi
} > 0.
For a study on the stability and equilibria of the flux-decay
model (5), based on the Hamiltonian function (4), we refer to
[6]. The stability results established in [6] rely on the following
assumption.
Assumption 2. Given a constant input up = ūp . There exists
an equilibrium (η̄, p̄, Ēq0 ) of (5) that satisfies η̄ ∈ im DT , η̄ ∈
(−π/2, π/2)m and ∇2 H(η̄, p̄, Ēq0 ) > 0.
aesthetic reasons we define the Hamiltonian Hp as ω n times the
physical energy as the factor 1/ω n appears in each of the energy functions.
As a result, Hp has the dimension of power instead of energy.
1 For
C. Social welfare problem
We define the social welfare by S(Pg , Pd ) := U (Pd ) −
C(Pg ), which consists of a utility function U (Pd ) of the power
consumption Pd and the cost C(Pg ) associated to the power
production Pg . We assume that C(Pg ), U (Pd ) are strictly
convex and strictly concave functions respectively.
Remark 1. It is also possible to include mutual costs and
utilities among the different control areas, provided that the
convexity/concavity assumption is satisfied.
The objective is to maximize the social welfare while
achieving zero frequency deviation. By analyzing the equilibria of (1), it follows that a necessary condition for zero
frequency deviation is 1T Pd = 1T Pg [6], i.e., the total supply
must match the total demand. It can be noted that (Pg , Pd ) is
a solution to the latter equation if and only if there exists a
v ∈ Rmc satisfying Dc v −Pg +Pd = 0 where Dc ∈ Rn×mc is
the incidence matrix of some connected communication graph
with mc edges and n nodes. Because of the latter equivalence,
we consider the following convex minimization problem:
min
Pg ,Pd ,v
− S(Pg , Pd ) = C(Pg ) − U (Pd )
s.t. Dc v − Pg + Pd = 0.
(6a)
(6b)
Remark 2. Although this paper focuses on optimal active
power sharing, we stress that it is also possible to consider
(optimal) reactive power sharing simultaneously, see e.g. [28]
for more details.
The Lagrangian corresponding to (6) is given by
L = C(Pg ) − U (Pd ) + λT (Dc v − Pg + Pd )
(7)
5
with Lagrange multipliers λ ∈ Rn . The resulting first-order
optimality conditions are given by the Karush–Kuhn–Tucker
(KKT) conditions
∇C(P̄g ) − λ̄ = 0,
−∇U (P̄d ) + λ̄ = 0,
DcT λ̄ = 0,
(8)
Dc v̄ − P̄g + P̄d = 0.
Since the minimization problem is convex, strong duality holds
and it follows that (P̄g , P̄d , v̄) is an optimal solution to (6) if
and only if there exists an λ̄ ∈ Rn that satisfies (8) [29].
III. BASIC PRIMAL - DUAL GRADIENT CONTROLLER
In this section we design the basic dynamic pricing algorithm which will be used as the starting point for the
controllers designs discussed in Section IV. Its dynamics is
obtained by applying the primal-dual gradient method [7],
[10], [14] to the minimization problem (6), resulting in
τg Ṗg = −∇C(Pg ) + λ + ugc
τd Ṗd = ∇U (Pd ) − λ +
udc
we interchangeably write the system dynamics in terms of
both xc and zc for ease of notation. In these new variables the
dynamics (9) admits a natural port-Hamiltonian representation
[20], which is given by
0 0 0
I
0 0 0
−I
ẋc =
0 0 0 −DcT ∇Hc (xc ) + ∇S(zc )
−I I Dc
0
I 0
0 I
u
+
(10)
0 0 c
0 0
I 0 0 0
P
yc =
∇Hc (xc ) = g ,
0 I 0 0
Pd
1
(11)
Hc (xc ) = xTc τc−1 xc .
2
(9a)
Note that the system (10) is indeed a port-Hamiltonian system2
since S is concave and therefore satisfies the incremental
passivity property
(9b)
(z1 − z2 )T (∇S(z1 ) − ∇S(z2 )) ≤ 0, ∀z1 , z2 ∈ R3n+mc .
τv v̇ = −DcT λ
(9c)
τλ λ̇ = Dc v − Pg + Pd .
(9d)
Here we introduce additional inputs uc = col(ugc , udc )
which are to be specified later on, and τc
:=
blockdiag(τg , τd , τv , τλ ) > 0 are controller design parameters.
Recall from Section II-C that there is freedom in choosing a
communication network and the associated incidence matrix.
Depending on the application, one may prefer all-to-all
communication where the underlying graph is complete, or
communication networks where its associated graph is a star,
line or cycle graph. In addition, τc determines the converge
rate of the dynamics (9); a large τc gives a slow convergence
rate whereas a small τc gives a fast convergence rate.
Observe that the dynamics (9) has a clear economic interpretation [1], [2], [5]: each power producer aims at maximizing their own profit, which occurs whenever their individual
marginal cost is equal to the local price λi + ugci . At the same
time, each consumer maximizes its own utility but is penalized
by the local price λi − udci .
The equations (9c), (9d) represent the distributed dynamic
pricing mechanism where the quantity v represents a virtual
power flow along the edges of the communication graph
with incidence matrix Dc . We emphasize virtual, since v
may not correspond to the real physical power flow as the
communication graph may be different than the physical
network topology. Equation (9d) shows that the local price
λi rises if the power demand plus power outflow at node
i ∈ V is greater than the local power supply plus power
inflow of power at node i and vice versa. The inputs ugc , udc are
interpreted as additional penalties or prices that are assigned to
the power producers and consumers respectively. These inputs
can be chosen appropriately to compensate for the frequency
deviation in the physical power network as we will show now.
To this end, define the variables xc = (xg , xd , xv , xλ ) =
(τg Pg , τd Pd , τv v, τλ λ) = τc zc and note that, in the sequel,
The port-Hamiltonian controller (10) is interconnected to the
physical network (5) by taking uc = −yp , up = yc . Define the
extended vectors of variables by
η
I 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 M 0 0 0 0 0 ω
0 0 I 0 0 0 0 Eq0
x :=
0 0 0 τg 0 0 0 Pg =: τ z. (12)
0 0 0 0 τd 0 0 Pd
0 0 0 0 0 τv 0 v
0 0 0 0 0 0 τλ
λ
Then the closed-loop port-Hamiltonian system takes the form
0
DT
0
0
0
0
0
−D −A
0
I −I 0
0
0
0
−Rq 0
0
0
0
−I
0
0
0
0
I
ẋ =
∇H(x)
0
0
I
0
0
0
0
−I
T
0
0
0
0
0
0 −Dc
0
0
0
−I I Dc
0
+ ∇S(z),
(13)
where H = Hp +Hc is equal to the sum of the energy function
(4) corresponding to the physical model, and the controller
Hamiltonian (11). In the sequel we write (13) more compactly
as
ẋ = (J − R)∇H(x) + ∇S(z),
where R = RT ≥ 0, J = −J T . We define the equilibrium set
of (13), expressed in the variable z, by
Z1 = {z̄ | z̄ is an equilibrium of (13)}.
(14)
Note that each z̄ ∈ Z1 satisfies the optimality conditions
(8) and simultaneously the zero frequency constraints of the
2 Strictly
speaking, (10) is an incremental port-Hamiltonian system [27].
6
physical network (5) given by ω̄ = 0. Hence, Z1 corresponds
to the desired equilibria, and the next theorem states the
convergence to this set of optimal points.
Theorem 1. For every z̄ ∈ Z1 satisfying Assumption 2 there
exists a neighborhood Υ around z̄ where all trajectories z
satisfying (13) with initial conditions in Υ converge to the set
Z1 . In addition, the convergence of each such trajectory is to
a point.
Proof. Let z̄ ∈ Z1 and define the shifted Hamiltonian H̄
around x̄ := τ z̄ as [27], [6]
H̄(x) = H(x) − (x − x̄)T ∇H(x̄) − H(x̄).
(15)
After rewriting, the closed-loop port-Hamiltonian system (13)
is equivalently described by
− (∇Eq0 H̄)T Rq ∇Eq0 H̄ ≤ 0,
A. Including nodal power constraints
The results of Section III can be extended to the case where
nodal constraints on the power production and consumption
are included into the optimization problem (6). To this end,
consider the social welfare problem
min
Pg ,Pd ,v
− S(Pg , Pd ) := C(Pg ) − U (Pd )
s.t. Dc v − Pg + Pd = 0,
g(Pg , Pd ) 0
(17a)
(17b)
(17c)
where g : R2n → Rl is a convex function.
ẋ = (J − R)∇H̄(x) + ∇S(z) − ∇S(z̄).
The shifted Hamiltonian H̄ satisfies
H̄˙ = −ω T Aω + (z − z̄)T (∇S(z) − ∇S(z̄))
include, among other things, the possibility to incorporate
nodal power constraints, and line congestion in conjunction
with transmission costs into the social welfare problem.
(16)
where equality holds if and only if ∇Eq0 H̄(x) = ∇Eq0 H(x) =
0, ω = 0, Pg = P̄g , Pd = P̄d since S(z) is strictly concave in
Pg and Pd . Bearing in mind Assumption 2, it is observed
that ∇2 H(x) = ∇2 H̄(x) > 0 for all x in a sufficiently
small open neighborhood around x̄. Hence, as H̄˙ ≤ 0, there
exists a compact sublevel set Υ of H̄ around z̄ contained in
such neighborhood, which is forward invariant. By LaSalle’s
invariance principle, each the solution with initial conditions
in Υ converges to the largest invariant set S contained in
Υ ∩ {z | ∇Eq0 H(x) = 0, ω = 0, Pg = P̄g , Pd = P̄d }.
On such invariant set λ = λ̄ and η, v, Eq0 are constant. Hence,
z converges to S ⊂ Z1 as t → ∞.
Finally, we prove that the convergence of each solution of
(13) initializing in Υ is to a point. This is equivalent to proving
that its omega-limit set Ω(x) is a singleton. Since the solution
x is bounded, Ω(x) 6= ∅ by the Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem
[30]. By contradiction, suppose now that there exist two
distinct point in Ω(x), say x̄1 , x̄2 ∈ Ω(x), x̄1 6= x̄2 . Then there
exists H̄1 (x), H̄2 (x) defined by (15) with respect to x̄1 , x̄2
respectively and scalars c1 , c2 ∈ R>0 such that H̄1−1 (≤ c1 ) :=
{x | H̄1 (x) ≤ c1 }, H̄2−1 (≤ c2 ) := {x | H̄2 (x) ≤ c2 } are
disjoint and compact as the Hessian of H̄1 , H̄2 is positive definite in the neighborhood Υ. Since each trajectory z converges
to Z1 as proven above, it follows that τ −1 x̄1 , τ −1 x̄2 ∈ Z1 .
Together with x̄1 ∈ Ω(x), this implies that there exists a finite
time t1 > 0 such that x(t) ∈ H̄1−1 (≤ c1 ) for all t ≥ t1 as
the set H̄1−1 (≤ c1 ) is invariant by the dissipation inequality
(16). Similarly, there exists a finite time t2 > 0 such that
x(t) ∈ H̄2−1 (≤ c2 ) for all t ≥ t2 . This implies that the
solution x(t) satisfies x(t) ∈ H̄1−1 (≤ c1 ) ∩ H̄1−1 (≤ c1 ) = ∅
for t ≥ max(t1 , t2 ) which is a contradiction. This concludes
the proof.
Remark 3. Note that (17c) captures the convex inequality
constraints considered in the existing literature. For example,
by choosing g as
Pg − Pgmax
g1 (Pg , Pd )
g2 (Pg , Pd ) Pgmin − Pg
g(Pg , Pd ) =
g3 (Pg , Pd ) = Pd − P max ,
d
g4 (Pg , Pd )
Pdmin − Pd
the resulting inequality constraints (17c) become Pgmin
Pg Pgmax , Pdmin Pd Pdmax which, among others, are
used in [13], [14], [18].
In the sequel, we assume that (17) satisfies Slater’s condition
[29]. As a result, (P̄g , P̄d , v̄) is an optimal solution to (17)
if and only if there exists λ̄ ∈ Rn , µ̄ ∈ Rl≥0 satisfying the
following KKT optimality conditions:
∂g
(P̄g , P̄d )µ̄ = 0,
∂Pg
∂g
(P̄g , P̄d )µ̄ = 0,
−∇U (P̄d ) + λ̄ +
∂Pd
Dc v̄ − P̄g + P̄d = 0,
DcT λ̄ = 0,
∇C(P̄g ) − λ̄ +
g(P̄g , P̄d ) 0,
µ̄ 0,
(18)
µ̄T g(P̄g , P̄d ) = 0.
Next, we introduce the following subsystems [20], [9]
(
gi (wi )
if µi > 0
+
ẋµi = (gi (wi ))µi :=
max{0, gi (w)} if µi = 0
(19)
1 T −1
yµi = ∇gi (wi )∇Hµi (xµi ), Hµi (xµi ) = xµi τµi xµi
2
with state xµi := τµi µi ∈ R≥0 , outputs yµi ∈ Rl , inputs
wi ∈ R2n , and i ∈ I := {1, . . . , l}. Here gi (.) is the i’th entry
of the vector-valued function g(.) = coli∈V {gi (.)}. Note that,
for a given i ∈ I and for a constant input w̄i , the equilibrium
set Zµi of (19) is characterized by all (µ̄i , w̄i ) satisfying
gi (w̄i ) ≤ 0,
µ̄i ≥ 0,
µ̄i = 0 ∨ gi (w̄i ) = 0.
(20)
IV. VARIATIONS IN THE CONTROLLER DESIGN
More formally, for i ∈ I the equilibrium set Zµi of (19) is
given by
In this section we propose several variations and extensions
of the controller designed in the previous section. These
Zµi := {(µ̄i , w̄i ) | (µ̄i , w̄i ) satisfies (20)}.
7
Remark 4. In case the inequality constraints of Remark 3 (e.g.
Pg Pgmax ) are considered, the subsystems (19) take the
decentralized form
(
max
Pgi − Pgi
if µi > 0
max +
ẋµi = (Pgi − Pgi
)µi =
max
max{0, Pgi − Pgi } if µi = 0
1
yµi = ∇Hµi (xµi ), Hµi (xµi ) = xTµi τµ−1
xµi , i ∈ V,
i
2
(21)
and similar expressions can be given for the remaining inequalities Pgmin Pg , Pdmin Pd Pdmax .
The subsystems (19) have the following passivity property
[20].
states, the closed-loop system inherits the same property
provided that an equilibrium of (24) exists.
Proposition 2 ([20]). Let i ∈ I, (µ̄i , w̄i ) ∈ Zµi and define
ȳµi := ∇gi (w̄i )µ̄i . Then (19) is passive with respect to the
shifted external port-variables w̃i := wi − w̄i , ỹµi := yµi − ȳµi .
Additionally, (µi , wi ) → Zµi as t → ∞ for (µi , wi ), wi = w̄i
satisfying (19).
where x̃µ := xµ − x̄µ and H̄ is defined by (23). By Proposition
2 and Remark 5, the time-derivative of H̄e satisfies
X
H̄˙ e ≤ ũT ỹ + w̃T
ỹµi = ũT ỹ − ũT ỹ = 0
Consider again system (13)
ẋ = (J − R)∇H(x) + ∇S(z) + GT u
P
0 0 I
y = G∇H(x) = g , G =
Pd
0 0 0
0
I
0 0
0 0
(22)
with the state x defined by (12), where we introduce an
additional input u ∈ R2n and output y ∈ R2n .
Remark 5. Note that for any steady state (x̄, ū) of (22), the
latter system is passive with respect to the shifted external
port-variables ũ := u − ū, ỹ = y − ȳ, ȳ := G∇H(x̄), using
the storage function
H̄(x) := H(x) − (x − x̄)T ∇H(x̄) − H(x̄).
(23)
We interconnect the subsystems (19) to (22) in a powerpreserving way by
X
wi = w = y ∀i ∈ I,
u=−
yµi
i∈I
to obtain the closed-loop system
η̇ = DT ω
M ω̇ =
Td0 Ėq0
=
−DΓ(Eq0 ) sin η −
−F (η)Eq0 + Ef
(24a)
Aω + Pg − Pd
(24c)
∂g
(Pg , Pd )µ − ω
τg Ṗg = −∇C(Pg ) + λ −
∂Pg
∂g
τd Ṗd = ∇U (Pd ) − λ −
(Pg , Pd )µ + ω
∂Pd
τv v̇ = −∇CT (v) − DT λ
τλ λ̇ = Dv − Pg + Pd
τµi µ̇i = (gi (Pg , Pd ))+
µi ,
(24b)
(24d)
(24e)
(24f)
(24g)
i ∈ I.
(24h)
Observe that the equilibrium set Z2 of (24), if expressed in the
co-energy variables, is characterized by all (z̄, µ̄) that satisfy
(18) in addition to ω̄ = 0, −DΓ(Ēq0 ) sin η̄ + P̄g − P̄d =
0, −F (η̄)Ēq0 + Ef = 0, and therefore corresponds to the
desired operation points.
Since both the subsystems (19) and the system (13) admit
an incrementally passivity property with respect to their steady
Theorem 2. For every (z̄, µ̄) ∈ Z2 satisfying Assumption 2
there exists a neighborhood Υ of (z̄, µ̄) where all trajectories
z satisfying (24) with initial conditions in Υ converge to the
set Z2 and the convergence of each such trajectory is to a
point.
Proof. Let (z̄, µ̄) ∈ Z2 and consider the shifted Hamiltonian
H̄e around (x̄, x̄µ ) = (τ z̄, τµ µ̄) defined by
X
1
x̃µ
H̄e (x, xµ ) := H̄(x) +
H̄µi (xµi ) = H̄(x) + x̃Tµ τx−1
µ
2
i∈I
i∈I
where equality holds only if Pg = P̄g , Pd = P̄d , ω =
0, ∇Eq0 H(x) = 0. On the largest invariant set where H̄˙ e = 0 it
follows by the second statement of Proposition 2 that µ = µ̄.
As a result, λ = λ̄ and v, η, Eq0 are constant on this invariant
set. Since the right-hand side of (19) is discontinuous and takes
the same form as in [25], we can apply the invariance principle
for discontinuous Caratheodory systems [25, Proposition 2.1]
to conclude that (z, µ) → Z2 as t → ∞. By following
the same line of arguments as in the proof of Theorem 1,
convergence of each trajectory to a point is proven.
Remark 6. Theorem 2 uses the Caratheodory variant of the
Invariance Principle which requires that the Caratheodory
solution of (24) is unique and that its omega-limit set is
invariant [25]. These requirements are indeed satisfied by
extending Lemmas 4.1-4.4 of [25] to the case where equality
constraints and nonstrict convex/concave (utility) functions are
considered in the optimization problem [25, equation (3)],
noting that these lemmas only require convexity/concavity
instead of their strict versions. In particular, by adding a
quadratic function of the Lagrange multipliers associated with
the equality constraints to the Lyapunov function, it can be
proven that monotonicity of the primal-dual dynamics with
respect to primal-dual optimizers as stated in [25, Lemma 4.1]
holds for this more general case as well, see also [20], [31].
Remark 7. Instead of using the hybrid dynamics (19) for
dealing with the inequality constraints (17c), we can instead introduce the so called barrier functions Bi =
−ν log(−gi (Pg , Pd )) that are added to the objective function
[29]. Simultaneously, the corresponding inequalities in the
social welfare problem (17) are removed to obtain the modified
convex optimization problem
X
min − S(Pg , Pd ) − ν
log(−gi (Pg , Pd ))
Pg ,Pd ,v
(25)
i∈V
s.t. Dc v − Pg + Pd = 0.
Here ν > 0 is called the barrier parameter and is usually
chosen small. By applying the primal-dual gradient method to
8
(25) it can be shown that, if the system is initialized in the
interior of the feasible region, i.e. where (17c) holds, then the
trajectories of the resulting gradient dynamics remain within
the feasible region and the system converges to a suboptimal
value of the social welfare [7], [29], [32]. However, if Slater’s
condition holds, this suboptimal value which depends on ν
converges to the optimal value of the social welfare problem as
ν → 0 [29]. The particular advantage of using barrier functions
is to avoid the use of an hybrid controller and to enforce that
the trajectories remain within the feasible region for all future
time.
the physical model (2), we obtain the following closed-loop
system:
η̇ = DT ω
M ω̇ =
Td0 Ėq0
=
min
Pg ,Pd ,v
− S(Pg , Pd , v) := C(Pg ) + CT (v) − U (Pd ) (26a)
s.t. Dv − Pg + Pd = 0
(26b)
− κ v κ,
(26c)
where κ ∈ Rm satisfies the element-wise inequality κ 0.
Note that in this case the communication graph is chosen to
be identical with the topology of the physical network, i.e.,
Dc = D. As a result, the additional constraints (26c) bound
the (virtual) power flow along the transmission lines as |vk | ≤
κk , k ∈ E. The corresponding Lagrangian is given by
L = C(Pg ) + CT (v) − U (Pd ) + λT (Dv − Pg + Pd )
+
µT+ (v
− κ) +
µT− (−κ
with Lagrange multipliers λ ∈ R , µ+ , µ+ ∈
resulting KKT optimality conditions are given by
∇C(P̄g ) − λ̄ = 0,
Rm
≥0 .
(28c)
τd Ṗd = ∇U (Pd ) − λ + ω
(28e)
T
τv v̇ = −∇CT (v) − D λ − µ+ + µ−
(28f)
τλ λ̇ = Dv − Pg + Pd
(28g)
(v − κ)+
µ+
(−κ − v)+
µ− .
(28h)
(28i)
The latter system can partially be put into a port-Hamiltonian
form, since equations (28a)-(28g) can be rewritten as
ẋ = (J − R)∇H(x) + ∇S(z) + N µ
T
0 0 0 0 −I 0
N=
,
0 0 0 0 I 0
(29)
where the variables x, z and the Hamiltonian H are respectively defined by (12) and (13) as before, and µ =
col(µ+ , µ− ).
Since the network topology is a tree (i.e. ker D = {0}),
the equilibrium of (28) satisfies v̄ = Γ(Ēq0 ) sin η̄. Hence, the
controller variable v corresponds to the physical power flow
of the network if the closed-loop system is at steady state.
Consequently, the constraints and costs on v correspond to
constraints and costs of the physical power flow if the system
converges to an equilibrium.
Theorem 3. Let the network topology be acyclic and let (z̄, µ̄)
be an (isolated) equilibrium of (28) satisfying Assumption 2.
Then all trajectories (z, µ) of (28) initialized in a sufficiently
small neighborhood around (z̄, µ̄) converge asymptotically to
(z̄, µ̄)
Proof. Let (z̄, µ̄) be the equilibrium of (28). By defining the
shifted Hamiltonian H̄(x) around x̄ := τ z̄ by
− v)
n
(28b)
(28d)
τ− µ̇− =
The previous section shows how to include nodal power
constraints into the social welfare problem. In case the network
is acyclic, line congestion and power transmission costs can
be incorporated into the optimization problem as well.
To this end, define the (modified) social welfare by U (Pd )−
C(Pg )−CT (v) where the convex function CT (v) corresponds
to the power transmission cost. If security constraints on
the transmission lines are included as well, the optimization
problem (6) modifies to
Aω + Pg − Pd
τg Ṗg = −∇C(Pg ) + λ − ω
τ+ µ̇+ =
B. Including line congestion and transmission costs
(28a)
−DΓ(Eq0 ) sin η −
−F (η)Eq0 + Ef
H̄(x) = H(x) − (x − x̄)T ∇H(x̄) − H(x̄)
The
one can rewrite (29) as
ẋ = (J − R)∇H̄(x) + ∇S(z) − ∇S(z̄) + N µ̃
−∇U (P̄d ) + λ̄ = 0,
(30)
T
∇CT (v̄) + D λ̄ + µ̄+ − µ̄− = 0,
−κ v̄ κ,
µ̄+ , µ̄− 0,
µ̄T+ (v̄ − κ) = 0,
Dv̄ − P̄g + P̄d = 0,
(27)
µ̄T− (−κ − v̄) = 0.
Suppose that Slater’s condition holds. Then, since the optimization problem (26) is convex, it follows that (P̄g , P̄d , v̄)
is an optimal solution to (26) if and only if there exists
λ̄ ∈ Rn , µ̄ = col(µ̄+ , µ̄− ) ∈ R2m
≥0 satisfying (27) [29].
By applying the gradient method to (26) in a similar
manner as before and connecting the resulting controller with
where µ̃ := µ − µ̄. Consider candidate Lyapunov function
1
1
V (x, µ) = H̄(x) + µ̃+ τµ+ µ̃+ + µ̃T− τµ− µ̃−
2
2
and observe that
T
T
T
µ̃T+ (v − κ)+
µ+ ≤ µ̃+ (v − κ) = µ̃+ (v̄ − κ + ṽ) ≤ µ̃+ ṽ
T
µ̃T− (−κ − v)+
µ− ≤ µ̃− (−κ − v)
= µ̃T− (−κ − v̄ − ṽ) ≤ −µ̃T− ṽ.
9
Bearing in mind (30), the time-derivative of V amounts to
1
1
Ĥ(x̂) = Hp + xTg τg−1 xg + xTd τd−1 xd
2
2
1
1
+ xTv τv−1 xv + (xθ − p)τλ−1 (xθ − p).
2
2
By writing the system of differential equations (31) explicitly
we obtain
V̇ = −ω T Aω − (∇Eq0 H(x))T Rq ∇Eq0 H(x)
+ (z − z̄)T (∇S(z) − ∇S(z̄))
T
+
− ṽ T µ̃+ + ṽ T µ̃− + µ̃T+ (v − κ)+
µ+ + µ̃− (−κ − v)µ−
≤ −ω T Aω + (z − z̄)T (∇S(z) − ∇S(z̄))
− (∇Eq0 H(x))T Rq ∇Eq0 H(x) ≤ 0
η̇ = DT ω
where equality holds only if ∇Eq0 H(x) = 0, ω = 0, Pg =
P̄g , Pd = P̄d . On the largest invariant set S where ∇Eq0 H(x) =
0, ω = 0, Pg = P̄g , Pd = P̄d it follows that, since the graph
contains no cycles λ = λ̄, v = v̄, µ = µ̄ and that η, Eq0 are
constant, which corresponds to an equilibrium. In particular
∇V (x, µ) = 0 for all (z, µ) ∈ S and (z̄, µ̄) ∈ S. Since
by Assumption 2 we have ∇2 V (x̄, µ̄) > 0, it follows that
(z̄, µ̄) is isolated. By the invariance principle for discontinuous Caratheodory systems [25] all trajectories (z, µ) of (28)
initializing in a sufficienly small neighborhood around (z̄, µ̄)
satisfy µ → µ̄, z → z̄ as t → ∞.
Remark 8. It is possible to include nodal power constraints,
line congestion and transmission costs simultaneously. However, as the results in this section are only valid for acyclic
graphs, it should also be assumed for the more general case
that the physical network is a tree.
C. State transformation
Consider again the minimization problem (6). As shown
before, by applying the gradient method to the social welfare
problem, the closed-loop system (13) is obtained.
Note that in the λ-dynamics the demand Pd appears, which
in practice is often uncertain. A possibility to eliminate the demand from the controller dynamics is by a state transformation
[10], [12]. To this end, define the new variables
η
η
I 0 0 0 0 0 0
p
p 0 I 0 0 0 0 0
0
0
Eq 0 0 I 0 0 0 0
Eq
Pg =: τ̂ ẑ,
0
0
0
I
0
0
0
x̂ :=
=
x
=
τ̂
x
g
xd 0 0 0 0 I 0 0
Pd
xv 0 0 0 0 0 I 0
v
0 I 0 0 0 0 I
xθ
θ
i.e., xθ := τθ θ = p + xλ . Then
(13) transforms to
0
DT
0
0
−D −A
0
I
0
0
−Rq 0
˙x̂ = 0
−I
0
0
0
I
0
0
0
0
0
0
−D −A
0
0
the port-Hamiltonian system
0
−I
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Dc
with Hamiltonian
DT
−A
0
0
∇Ĥ(x̂)
0
−DcT
−A
+ ∇S(ẑ)
(31)
M ω̇ = −DΓ(Eq0 ) sin η − Aω + Pg − Pd
Td0 Ėq0 = −F (η)Eq0 + Ef
τg Ṗg = −∇C(Pg ) + τλ−1 (τθ θ − M ω) − ω
τd Ṗd = ∇U (Pd ) −
τv v̇ =
τλ−1 (τθ θ
−DcT τλ−1 (τθ θ
(32)
− M ω) + ω
− M ω)
τθ θ̇ = Dc v − DΓ sin η − Aω.
Define Z4 as the set of all ẑ ∗ := (η̄, ω̄, P̄g , P̄d , v̄, θ̄) that are
an equilibrium of (32). Using the previous established tools
we can prove asymptotic stability to the set of optimal points
Z4 .
Theorem 4. For every ẑ ∗ ∈ Z4 satisfying Assumption 2 there
exists a neighborhood Υ around ẑ ∗ where all trajectories ẑ
satisfying (32) (or equivalently (31)) and initializing in Υ
converge to Z4 . In addition, the convergence of each such
trajectory is to a point.
Proof. We proceed along the same lines as in the proof of
Theorem 1. Since the stability result of Theorem 1 is preserved
after a state transformation, the proof is concluded.
Note that the latter result holds for all τg , τd , τv , τλ , τθ > 0.
The controller appearing in (32) can be simplified by choosing
τλ = τθ = M . As a result, the controller dynamics is described
by
τg Ṗg = −∇C(Pg ) + θ − 2ω
(33a)
τd Ṗd = ∇U (Pd ) − θ + 2ω
(33b)
τv v̇ =
−DcT (θ
M θ̇ = Dc v −
− ω)
DΓ(Eq0 ) sin η
(33c)
− Aω.
(33d)
The main advantage of controller design (33) is that no
information about the power supply and demand is required
in the dynamic pricing algorithm (33c), (33d), where we
observe that the quantity θ − 2ω acts here as the electricity
price for the producers and consumers. Another benefit of the
proposed dynamic pricing algorithm is that, contrary to [16],
no information is required about ω̇.
On the other hand, knowledge about the physical power
flows and the power system parameters M, A is required.
Determining the radius of uncertainty of these parameters
under which asymptotic stability is preserved remains an open
question [10]; see [17] for results in a similar setting where
only the damping term A is assumed to be uncertain.
D. Relaxing the strict convexity assumption
By making a minor modification to the social welfare
problem (6), it is possible to relax the condition that the
10
functions C, U are strictly convex and concave respectively.
To this end, consider the optimization problem
1
C(Pg ) − U (Pd ) + ρ||Dc v − Pg + Pd ||2
Pg ,Pd ,v
2
s.t. Dc v − Pg + Pd = 0,
min
(34a)
(34b)
where ρ > 0, C(Pg ) is convex and U (Pd ) is concave, which
makes the optimization problem (34) convex. Suppose that
there exists a feasible solution to the minimization problem,
then the set of optimal points of (34) is identical with the
set of optimal points of (6) which is characterized by set of
points satisfying the KKT conditions (8). The corresponding
augmented Lagrangian of (34) is given by
Lp = C(Pg ) − U (Pd ) − λT (Dc v + Pg − Pd )
1
+ ρ||Dc v + Pg − Pd ||2 .
2
Consequenctly, the distributed dynamics of the primal-dual
gradient method applied to (34) amounts to
τg Ṗg = −∇C(Pg ) + λ − ρ(Dc v + Pg − Pd )
τd Ṗd = ∇U (Pd ) − λ + ρ(Dc v + Pg − Pd )
τv v̇ = DcT λ − ρDcT (Dc v + Pg − Pd )
(35)
τλ λ̇ = −Dc v − Pg + Pd ,
which can be written in the same port-Hamiltonian form as
(13) where in this case
1
S(Pg , Pd , v) = U (Pd ) − C(Pg ) − ρ||Dc v − Pg + Pd ||2 .
2
(36)
This leads to the following result.
Theorem 5. Consider the system (13) where S is given by
(36) and suppose that C, U are convex and concave functions
respectively. Then for every z̄ ∈ Z1 satisfying Assumption 2,
where Z1 is defined by (14), there exists a neighborhood Υ
around z̄ wherein each trajectory z satisfying (13) converges
to a point in Z1 .
Proof. Let z̄ ∈ Z1 . By the proof of Theorem 1 it follows that
H̄˙ = −ω T Aω + (z − z̄)T (∇S(z) − ∇S(z̄))
− (∇Eq0 H̄)T Rq ∇Eq0 H̄,
S ⊂ Z1 . By continuing along the same lines as the proof
of Theorem 1, convergence of each trajectory to a point is
proven.
Remark 9. Adding the quadratic term in the social welfare
problem as done in (34a) provides an additional advantage.
As this introduces more damping in the resulting gradientmethod-based controller, see (37), it may improve the convergence properties of the closed-loop dynamics [33], [34].
Moreover, the amount of damping injected into the system
depends on parameter ρ, which can be chosen freely.
V. C ONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE RESEARCH
In this paper a unifying and systematic energy-based approach in modeling and stability analysis of power networks
has been established. Convergence of the closed-loop system
to the set of optimal points using gradient-method-based
controllers have been proven using passivity based arguments.
This result is extended to the case where nodal power constraints are included into the problem as well. However,
for line congestion and power transmission cost the power
network is required to be acyclic to prove asymptotic stability
to the set of optimal points.
The results established in this paper lend themselves to
many possible extensions. One possibility is to design an
additional (passive) controller that regulates the voltages to the
desired values or achieves alternative objectives like (optimal)
reactive power sharing. This could for example be realized by
continuing along the lines of [28].
Recent observations, see [35], suggest that the portHamiltonian framework also lends itself to consider higherdimensional models for the synchronous generator than the
third-order model used in this paper, while the same controllers
as designed in the present paper can be used in this case
as well. In addition, current research includes extending the
results of the present paper to network-preserving models
where a distinction is made between generator and load nodes.
One of the remaining open questions is how to deal with
line congestion and power transmission costs in cyclic power
networks with nonlinear power flows. In addition, all of
the results established for the nonlinear power network only
provide local asymptotic stability to the set of optimal points.
Future research includes determining the region of attraction.
where the second term can be written as
P̃dT (∇U (Pd ) − ∇U (P̄d )) − P̃gT (∇C(Pg ) − ∇C(P̄g ))
T
−I
I
−Dc
P̃g
P̃g
−I
Dc P̃d ≤ 0
− ρ P̃d I
(37)
−DcT DcT −DcT Dc
ṽ
ṽ
where P̃g = Pg − P̄g , P̃d = Pd − P̄d , ṽ = v − v̄. Hence,
we obtain that H̄˙ ≤ 0 where equality holds only if ω =
0, ∇Eq0 H̄(x) = 0 and Dc ṽ + P̃g − P̃d = Dc v + Pg − Pd = 0.
On the largest invariant set S where H̄˙ = 0 we have ω = 0
c
and η, Eq0
optimality
invariance
where all
are constant and (Pg , Pd , v, λ) satisfy the KKT
conditions (8). Therefore S ⊂ Z1 and by LaSalle’s
principle there exists a neighborhood Υ around z̄
trajectories z satisfying (13) converge to the set
R EFERENCES
[1] F. Alvarado, “The stability of power system markets,” IEEE Transactions
on Power Systems, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 505–511, May 1999.
[2] A. Kiani and A. Annaswamy, “The effect of a smart meter on congestion
and stability in a power market,” in 49th IEEE Conference on Decision
and Control, Atlanta, USA, December, 2010.
[3] ——, “A hierarchical transactive control architecture for renewables
integration in smart grids,” in Decision and Control (CDC), 2012 IEEE
51st Annual Conference on. IEEE, 2012, pp. 4985–4990.
[4] M. Roozbehani, M. Dahleh, and S. Mitter, “On the stability of wholesale
electricity markets under real-time pricing,” in 49th IEEE Conference on
Decision and Control (CDC), 2010, pp. 1911–1918.
[5] F. Alvarado, J. Meng, C. DeMarco, and W. Mota, “Stability analysis
of interconnected power systems coupled with market dynamics,” IEEE
Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 695–701, 2001.
[6] S. Trip, M. Bürger, and C. De Persis, “An internal model approach
to (optimal) frequency regulation in power grids with time-varying
voltages,” Automatica, vol. 64, pp. 240–253, 2016.
11
[7] J. Arrow, L. Hurwicz, H. Uzawa, and H. Chenery, Studies in linear and
non-linear programming. Stanford University Press, 1958.
[8] D. Feijer and F. Paganini, “Stability of primal–dual gradient dynamics
and applications to network optimization,” Automatica, vol. 46, pp.
1974–1981, September 2010.
[9] A. Jokić, M. Lazar, and P. P. Van den Bosch, “On constrained steadystate regulation: dynamic KKT controllers,” Automatic Control, IEEE
Transactions on, vol. 54, no. 9, pp. 2250–2254, 2009.
[10] N. Li, L. Chen, C. Zhao, and S. H. Low, “Connecting automatic
generation control and economic dispatch from an optimization view,”
in American Control Conference. IEEE, 2014, pp. 735–740.
[11] E. Mallada and S. Low, “Distributed frequency-preserving optimal load
control,” in IFAC World Congress, 2014.
[12] Y. Seungil and C. Lijun, “Reverse and forward engineering of frequency
control in power networks,” in Proc. of IEEE Conference on Decision
and Control, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2014.
[13] X. Zhang, N. Li, and A. Papachristodoulou, “Achieving real-time economic dispatch in power networks via a saddle point design approach,”
in Power & Energy Society General Meeting, 2015. IEEE, 2015, pp.
1–5.
[14] X. Zhang and A. Papachristodoulou, “A real-time control framework
for smart power networks with star topology,” in American Control
Conference (ACC), 2013, pp. 5062–5067.
[15] ——, “A real-time control framework for smart power networks: Design
methodology and stability,” Automatica, vol. 58, pp. 43–50, 2015.
[16] C. Zhao, E. Mallada, and S. Low, “Distributed generator and loadside secondary frequency control in power networks,” in 49th Annual
Conference on Information Sciences and Systems (CISS). IEEE, 2015,
pp. 1–6.
[17] E. Mallada, C. Zhao, and S. Low, “Optimal load-side control for
frequency regulation in smart grids,” in Communication, Control, and
Computing (Allerton), 2014 52nd Annual Allerton Conference on.
IEEE, 2014, pp. 731–738.
[18] X. Zhang and A. Papachristodoulou, “Distributed dynamic feedback
control for smart power networks with tree topology,” in American
Control Conference (ACC), 2014, pp. 1156–1161.
[19] C. Zhao, U. Topcu, N. Li, and S. Low, “Design and stability of load-side
primary frequency control in power systems,” Automatic Control, IEEE
Transactions on, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 1177–1189, 2014.
[20] T. W. Stegink, C. De Persis, and A. J. van der Schaft, “Port-Hamiltonian
formulation of the gradient method applied to smart grids,” IFACPapersOnLine, vol. 48, no. 13, pp. 13–18, 2015.
[21] ——, “A port-Hamiltonian approach to optimal frequency regulation in
power grids,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1509.07318, 2015.
[22] J. Machowski, J. Bialek, and J. Bumby, Power System Dynamics:
Stability and Control, 2nd ed. Ltd: John Wiley & Sons, 2008.
[23] P. Kundur, Power System Stability and Control. Mc-Graw-Hill Engineering, 1993.
[24] P. Sauer and M. Pai, Power system dynamics and stability. PrenticeHall, 1998.
[25] A. Cherukuri, E. Mallada, and J. Cortés, “Asymptotic convergence of
constrained primal–dual dynamics,” Systems & Control Letters, vol. 87,
pp. 10–15, 2016.
[26] P. Anderson and A. Fouad, Power System Control and Stability, 1st ed.
The Iowa State Univsersity Press, 1977.
[27] A. van der Schaft and D. Jeltsema, “Port-Hamiltonian systems theory:
An introductory overview,” Foundations and Trends in Systems and
Control, vol. 1, no. 2-3, pp. 173–378, 2014.
[28] C. De Persis and N. Monshizadeh, “A modular design of incremental
Lyapunov functions for microgrid control with power sharing,” arXiv
preprint arXiv:1510.05811, 2015.
[29] S. Boyd and L. Vandenberghe, Convex Optimization, 1st ed. Cambridge
University Press, 2004.
[30] W. Rudin, Principles of mathematical analysis. McGraw-Hill New
York, 1964, vol. 3.
[31] A. Cherukuri, B. Gharesifard, and J. Cortes, “Saddle-point dynamics:
conditions for asymptotic stability of saddle points,” arXiv preprint
arXiv:1510.02145, 2015.
[32] J. Wang and N. Elia, “A control perspective for centralized and distributed convex optimization,” in Decision and Control and European
Control Conference (CDC-ECC), 2011 50th IEEE Conference on.
IEEE, 2011, pp. 3800–3805.
[33] S. Boyd, N. Parikh, E. Chu, B. Peleato, and J. Eckstein, “Distributed
optimization and statistical learning via the alternating direction method
of multipliers,” Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, vol. 3,
no. 1, pp. 1–122, 2011.
[34] R. T. Rockafellar, “The multiplier method of Hestenes and Powell
applied to convex programming,” Journal of Optimization Theory and
applications, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 555–562, 1973.
[35] T. W. Stegink, C. De Persis, and A. J. van der Schaft, “Optimal
power dispatch in networks of high-dimensional models of synchronous
machines,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.06688, 2016.
Tjerk Stegink is a Ph.D. candidate at the Engineering and Technology Institute, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Groningen,
the Netherlands. He received his B.Sc. (2012) in
Applied Mathematics and M.Sc. (2014, cum laude)
in Systems, Control and Optimization from the
same university. His main research interests are in
modeling and nonlinear distributed control of power
systems.
Claudio De Persis received the Laurea degree (cum
laude) in electrical engineering in 1996 and the
Ph.D. degree in system engineering in 2000, both
from Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy. He
is currently a Professor at the Engineering and Technology Institute, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural
Sciences, University of Groningen, the Netherlands.
He is also affiliated with the Jan Willems Center for Systems and Control. Previously he was
with the Department of Mechanical Automation and
Mechatronics, University of Twente and with the
Department of Computer, Control, and Management Engineering, Sapienza
University of Rome. He was a Research Associate at the Department of
Systems Science and Mathematics, Washington University, St. Louis, MO,
USA, in 2000–2001, and at the Department of Electrical Engineering, Yale
University, New Haven, CT, USA, in 2001–2002. His main research interest
is in control theory, and his recent research focuses on dynamical networks,
cyberphysical systems, smart grids and resilient control. He was an Editor
of the International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control (2006–2013),
and is currently an Associate Editor of the IEEE Transactions On Control
Systems Technology (2010–2015), of the IEEE Transactions On Automatic
Control (2012–2015), and of Automatica (2013–present).
Arjan van der Schaft received the undergraduate
(cum laude) and Ph.D. degrees in Mathematics from
the University of Groningen, The Netherlands. In
1982 he joined the Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Twente, where he was appointed as full professor in Mathematical Systems
and Control Theory in 2000. In September 2005 he
returned to his Alma Mater as a full professor in
Mathematics.
Arjan van der Schaft is Fellow of the Institute
of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), and
Fellow of the International Federation of Automatic Control (IFAC). He was
Invited Speaker at the International Congress of Mathematicians, Madrid,
2006. He was the 2013 recipient of the 3-yearly awarded Certificate of
Excellent Achievements of the IFAC Technical Committee on Nonlinear
Systems.
He is (co-)author of the following books: System Theoretic Descriptions
of Physical Systems (1984), Variational and Hamiltonian Control Systems
(1987, with P.E. Crouch), Nonlinear Dynamical Control Systems (1990,
with H. Nijmeijer), L2-Gain and Passivity Techniques in Nonlinear Control
(1996, 2000), An Introduction to Hybrid Dynamical Systems (2000, with J.M.
Schumacher), Port-Hamiltonian Systems Theory: An Introductory Overview
(2014, with D. Jeltsema).
| 3cs.SY
|
Mean Field Residual Networks: On the Edge of Chaos
Greg Yang∗
Samuel S. Schoenholz
arXiv:1712.08969v1 [cs.NE] 24 Dec 2017
Microsoft Research AI
[email protected]
Google Brain
[email protected]
Abstract
We study randomly initialized residual networks using mean field theory and the
theory of difference equations. Classical feedforward neural networks, such as
those with tanh activations, exhibit exponential behavior on the average when
propagating inputs forward or gradients backward. The exponential forward dynamics causes rapid collapsing of the input space geometry, while the exponential
backward dynamics causes drastic vanishing or exploding gradients. We show,
in contrast, that by adding skip connections, the network will, depending on the
nonlinearity, adopt subexponential forward and backward dynamics, and in many
cases in fact polynomial. The exponents of these polynomials are obtained through
analytic methods and proved and verified empirically to be correct. In terms of
the “edge of chaos” hypothesis, these subexponential and polynomial laws allow
residual networks to “hover over the boundary between stability and chaos,” thus
preserving the geometry of the input space and the gradient information flow. In
our experiments, for each activation function we study here, we initialize residual
networks with different hyperparameters and train them on MNIST. Remarkably,
our initialization time theory can accurately predict test time performance of these
networks, by tracking either the expected amount of gradient explosion or the
expected squared distance between the images of two input vectors. Importantly,
we show, theoretically as well as empirically, that common initializations such
as the Xavier or the He schemes are not optimal for residual networks, because
the optimal initialization variances depend on the depth. Finally, we have made
mathematical contributions by deriving several new identities for the kernels of
powers of ReLU functions by relating them to the zeroth Bessel function of the
second kind.
1
Introduction
Previous works [9, 3, 11] have shown that randomly initialized neural networks exhibit a spectrum of
behavior with depth, from stable to chaotic, which depends on the variance of the initializations: the
cosine distance of two input vectors converges exponentially fast with depth to a fixed point in [0, 1];
if this fixed point is 1, then the behavior is stable; if this fixed point is 0, then the behavior is chaotic.
It has been argued in many prior works [1, 9] that effective computation can only be supported by
a dynamical behavior that is on the edge of chaos. Too much stability prevents the neural network
from telling apart two different inputs. While some chaotic behavior can increase the expressivity
of a network, too much chaos makes the neural network think two similar inputs are very different.
At the same time, the same initialization variances also control how far gradient information can be
propagated through the network; the networks with chaotic forward dynamics will tend to suffer from
exploding gradients, while networks with stable forward dynamics will tend to suffer from vanishing
gradients.
∗
Work done while at Harvard University
31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2017), Long Beach, CA, USA.
These works have focused on vanilla (fully connected) feedforward networks. Here we consider
residual networks [6, 7] (with fully-connected layers and without batchnorm), which are a family
of recently proposed neural network architectures that has achieved state-of-the-art performance on
image recognition tasks, beating all other approaches by a large margin. The main innovation of this
family of architectures is the addition of a passthrough (identity) connection from the previous layer
to the next, such that the usual nonlinearity computes the “residual” between the next-layer activation
and the previous-layer activation.
In this work, we seek to characterize randomly initialized residual networks. One of our main results
is that random residual networks for many nonlinearities such as tanh live on the edge of chaos,
in that the cosine distance of two input vectors will converge to a fixed point at a polynomial rate,
rather than an exponential rate, as with vanilla tanh networks. Thus a typical residual network
will slowly cross the stable-chaotic boundary with depth, hovering around this boundary for many
layers. In addition, for most of the nonlinearities considered here, the mean field estimate of the
gradient grows subexponentially with depth. In fact, for α-ReLU, the αth-power of ReLU, for
α < 1, the gradient grows only polynomially. These theoretical results provide some theoretical
justification for why residual networks work so well in practice. In our experiments, we are also able
to predict surprisingly well the relative performances of trained residual networks based only on
their initialization hyperparameters, in a variety of settings. In particular, we find that the quality of
initialization for tanh resnets is determined by trainability (how much gradient explosion on average)
while that for (α-)ReLU resnets is determined by expressivity (how far can two different input vectors
be pulled apart) (see Section 6). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that a quantity other
than gradient explosion/vanishing has been found to control the quality of initialization. We establish
theoretically and empirically that the best initialization variances for residual networks depend on
the depth of the network (contrary to the feedforward case [11]), so that common initialization
schemes like Xavier [4] or He [5] cannot be optimal. In fact, even the rationale of He initialization
is incorrect for ReLU residual networks because it tries to control gradient dynamics rather than
expressivity. However we want to emphasize that we study a simplified model of residual networks
in this work, with no batchnorm or convolutional layers, so that these results are not necessarily
indicative of the MSRA residual network used in practice [6].
In the body of this paper, we give account of general intuition and/or proof strategy when appropriate
for our theoretical results, but we relegate all formal statements and proofs to the appendix.
2
Background
Consider a vanilla feedforward neural network of L layers, with each layer l having N (l) neurons;
here layer 0 is the input layer. For the ease of presentation we assume all hidden layer widths are the
(0)
(0)
same N (l) = N for all l > 0. Let x(0) = (x1 , . . . , xN (0) ) be the input vector to the network, and
let x(l) for l > 0 be the activation of layer l. Then a neural network is given by the equations
(l)
(l)
(l)
xi = φ(hi ),
hi =
N
X
(l) (l−1)
wij xj
(l)
+ bi
j=1
where (i) h(l) is the pre-activation at layer l, (ii) w(l) is the weight matrix, (iii) b(l) is the bias vector,
and (iv) φ is a nonlinearity, for example tanh or ReLU, which is applied coordinatewise to its input.
To lighten up notation, we suppress the explicit layer numbers l and write
X
xi = φ(hi ),
hi =
wij xj + bi
j
where • implicitly denotes •(l) , and • denotes •(l−1) (and analogously, • denotes •(l+1) ).
A series of papers [9, 10, 11] investigated the “average behavior” of random neural networks
(l)
(l)
2
sampled via wij ∼ N (0, σw
/N ), bi ∼ N (0, σb2 ), for fixed parameters σw and σb , independent of l.
P
N
Consider the expectation of N1 i=1 x2i , the normalized squared length of x, over the sampling of
w and b. Poole et al. [9] showed that this quantity converges to a fixed point exponentially fast for
sigmoid nonlinearities. Now suppose we propagate two different vectors x(0) and (x(0) )0 through the
2
PN
network. Poole et al. [9] also showed that the expectation of the normalized dot product N1 i=1 xi x0i
converges exponentially fast to a fixed point. The ratio between the normalized squared length and
the normalized dot product is the cosine distance between x and x0 . Thus these two exponential
convergence results show that the cosine distance converges exponentially fast to a fixed point as
well. Intuitively, this means that a vanilla feedforward network “forgets” the geometry of the input
space “very quickly,” after only a few layers.
In addition, Schoenholz et al. [11], under certain independence assumptions, showed that the expected
normalized squared norm of the gradient also vanishes or explodes in an exponential fashion with
depth, with the ”half-life” controlled by σw and σb . They verified that this theoretical ”half-life”
correlates in practice with the maximal number of layers that are admissible to good performance.
At the same time, Daniely et al. [3] published work of similar nature, but phrased in the language
of reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces, and provided high probability estimates that are meaningful
for the case when the width N is finite and the depth is logarithmic in N . However, they essentially
fixed the variance parameters σ• , and furthermore, their framework (for example the notion of a
“skeleton”) does not immediately generalize to the residual network case.
In this work, we show that residual networks have very different dynamics from vanilla feedforward
networks. In most cases, the cosine distance convergence rate and the gradient growth rate are
subexponential in a residual network, and in most cases, these rates may be polynomial.
3
Preliminaries
Residual networks were first introduced by [6] and later refined by [7], and they are now commonplace
among deployed neural systems. The key innovation there is the addition of a shortcut connection
from the previous layer to the next. We define the following idealized architectures for ease of
analysis. Note that we only consider fully-connected affine layers instead of convolutional layers. A
reduced residual network (RRN) has the recurrence
X
xi = φ(hi ) + x,
hi =
wij xj + bi .
j
A (full) residual network (FRN) in addition has an affine connection given by weights v and biases
a from the nonlinearity φ(h) to the next layer:
X
X
xi =
vij φ(hj ) + xi + ai ,
hi =
wij xj + bi
j
j
We are interested in the “average behavior” of these network when the weights and biases,
(l) (l) (l)
(l)
wij , bi , vij , and ai are sampled i.i.d. from Gaussian distributions resp. with standard devi(l)
2
ations σw , σb , σv , and σa , independent from l. Here we take the variance of wij to be σw
/N so that
(l)
2
the variance of each hi is σw
, assuming each xj is fixed (similarity for vij ). Such an initialization
scheme is standard in practice.
We make several key “physical assumptions” to make theoretical computations tractable:
(l)
(l)
Axiom 3.1 (Symmetry of activations and gradients). (a) We assume h(hi )2 i = h(hj )2 i and
(0)
(0)
(l)
h(xi )2 i = h(xj )2 i for any i, j, l. (b) We also assume that the gradient ∂E/∂xi with respect to
(l)
(l)
the loss function E satisfies h(∂E/∂xi )2 i = h(∂E/∂xj )2 i for any i, j, l.
One can see that Axiom 3.1(a) is satisfied if the input x(0) ∈ {±1}N and Axiom 3.1(b) is satisfied
if Axiom 3.2 below is true and the gradient at the last layer ∂E/∂xL ∈ {±1}N . But in general it
(l)
(l)
is justified both empirically and theoretically as an approximation, because (hi )2 − (hj )2 stays
(l)
(l)
about constant with l, but (hi )2 and (hj )2 grow rather quickly at the same pace with l (as will be
(l)
seen later in calculations), so that their additive difference becomes negligible; similarly for (xi )2
(l)
and (∂E/∂hi )2 .
3
Axiom 3.2 (Gradient independence). (a) We assume the we use a different set of weights for backpropagation than those used to compute the network outputs, but sampled i.i.d. from the same
(l)
distributions. (b) For any loss function E, we assume that the gradient at layer l, ∂E/∂xi , is
(l)
(l−1)
independent from all activations hj and xj
from the previous layer.
Axiom 3.2(a) was first made in [11] for computing the mean field theory of gradients for feedforward
tanh networks. This is similar to the practice of feedback alignment [8]. Even though we are the
first to explicitly formulate Axiom 3.2(b), in fact it was already applied implicitly in the gradient
(l)
(l+1)
calculations of [11]. Note that a priori Axiom 3.2(b) is not true, as ∂E/∂xi depends on φ̇(hk
)
(l)
(l−1)
for every k, which depend on hj for each j, and which depends on xk
for every k. Nevertheless,
in practice both subassumptions hold very well.
Now we define the central quantities studied in this paper. Inevitably, our paper involves a large
amount of notation that may be confusing for the first-time reader. We have included a glossary of
symbols (Table A.1) to ameliorate notation confusion.
(l)
Definition 3.3. Fix an input x(0) . Define the length quantities q(l) := h(h1 )2 i and p(l) :=
(l)
h(x1 )2 i for l > 0 and p(0) = kx(0) k2 /N . Here the expectations h•i are taken over all random
initialization of weights and biases for all layers l, as N → ∞ (large width limit).
Note that in our definition, the index 1 does not matter by Axiom 3.1.
Definition 3.4. Fix two inputs x(0) and x(0)0 . We write •0 to denote a quantity • with respect to the
0
(l) (l)
(l) (l)
input x(0) . Then define the correlation quantities γ (l) := hh1 h1 0 i and λ(l) := hx1 x1 0 i for
l > 0 and γ (0) = x(0) · x(0)0 /N , where the expectations h•i are taken over all random initialization
of weights and biases for all layers l, as N → ∞ (large width limit). Again, here the index 1
1
does not matter by Axiom 3.1. By metric expressivity, we mean s(l) := 2N
hkx(l) − x(l)0 k2 i =
1
1
(l) 2
(l)0 2
(l)
(l)0
(l)
(l)0
(l)
k i − 2hx · x i) = 2 (p + p ) − γ . Additionally, define the cosine
2N (hkx k i + hkx
p
p
distance quantities e(l) := γ (l) / p(l) p(l)0 and c(l) := λ(l) / q(l) q(l)0 , and we will also call e(l)
angular expressivity.
In this paper, for the ease of presentation, we assume p(0) = p(0)0 . Then, as we will see, p(l) =
p(l)0 , q(l) = q(l)0 for all l, and as a result, e(l) = γ (l) /p(l) and s(l) = p(l) − γ (l) = (1 − e(l) )p(l) .
(L)
Definition 3.5. Fix an input x(0) and a gradient vector (∂E/∂xi )i of some loss function E with
(l)
(l)
respect to the last layer x(L) . Then define the gradient quantities χ(l) := h(∂E/∂x1 )2 i, χ• :=
(l)
(l)
(l)
h(∂E/∂•1 )2 i for • = a, b, and χ• := h(∂E/∂•11 )2 i for • = w, v. Here the expectations are
taken with Axiom 3.2 in mind, over both random initialization of forward and backward weights and
biases, as N → ∞ (large width limit). Again, the index 1 or 11 does not matter by Axiom 3.1.
Asymptotic notations. The expressions f = O(g) ⇐⇒ g = Ω(f ) have their typical meanings,
and f = Θ(g) iff f = O(g), g = O(f ). We take f (x) = Õ(g(x)) ⇐⇒ g(x) = Ω̃(f (x)) to
mean f (x) = O(g logk x) for some k ∈ Z (this is slightly different from the standard usage of
Õ), and f = Θ̃(g) ⇐⇒ f = Õ(g) & g = Õ(f ). We introduce a new notation: f = Θ̌(g) if
f (x) = O(g(x) · x ) and f (x) = Ω(g(x) · x− ), as x → ∞, for any > 0. All asymptotic notations
are sign-less, i.e. can indicate either positive or negative quantities, unless stated otherwise.
4
Overview
The primary reason we may say anything about the average behavior of any of the above quantities is
the central limit theorem: every time the activations of the previous layer pass through an affine layer
whose weights are sampled i.i.d., the output is a sum of a large number of random variables, and thus
follows approximately Gaussian distributions. The mean and variance of these distributions can be
computed by keeping track of the mean and variances of the activations in the previous layer.
In what follows, we use this technique to derive recurrence equations governing p, q, γ, λ, χ for
different architectures and different activation functions. We use these equations to investigate the
4
dynamics of e and s, the key quantities in the forward pass, and the dynamics of χ, the key quantity
in the backward pass.
The cosine distance e in some sense measures the angular geometry of two vectors. If e = 1, then the
vectors are parallel; if e = 0, then they are orthogonal. Just as in [9] and [11], we will show that in
all of the architectures and activations we consider in this paper, e(l) converges to a fixed point e∗ as
l → ∞ 1 . Thus, on the average, as vectors propagate through network, the geometry of the original
input space, for example, linear separability, is “forgotten” by residual networks as well as by vanilla
networks. But we will prove and verify experimentally that, while Poole et al. [9] and [11] showed
that the convergence rate to e∗ is exponential in a vanilla network, the convergence rate is rather
only polynomial in residual networks, for tanh and α-ReLU (Defn 5.2) nonlinearities; see Thm B.5,
Thm B.11, Thm B.17, and Thm B.18. This slow convergence preserves geometric information in the
input space, and allows a typical residual network to “hover over the edge of chaos”: Even when the
cosine distance e(l) converges to 0, corresponding to “chaos”, (resp. 1, corresponding to “stability”),
for the number of layers usually seen in practice, e(l) will reside well away from 0 (resp. 1).
Similarly, the quantity s measures the metric geometry of two vectors. The evolution of s(l) with l
tells us the ability of the average network to separate two input points in terms of Euclidean distance.
Again, for tanh and α-ReLU (α < 1) nonlinearities, s varies only polynomially with l.
On the other hand, χ(l) measures the size of gradient at layer l, and through it we track the dynamics
of gradient backpropagation, be it explosion or vanishing. In contrast to vanilla tanh networks, which
can experience both of these two phenomenon depending on the initialization variances, typical
residual networks cannot have vanishing gradient, in the sense of vanishing χ(l) as l → 1; see
Thm B.5 and Thm B.12. Furthermore, while vanilla tanh networks exhibit exponentially vanishing
or exploding gradients, all of the activation/architecture pairings considered here, except the full
residual network with ReLU, have subexponential
gradient dynamics. While tanh residual networks
√
(0)
(l)
(reduced or full) has χ ≈ exp(Θ( l))χ (Thm B.13), α-ReLU residual networks for α < 1
have χ(0) ≈ poly(l)χ(l) (Thm B.20). Instead of ∂E/∂xi , we may also consider the size of gradients
of actual trainable parameters. For tanh and α-ReLU with α < 1, they are still subexponential and
polynomial (Thm B.21). On the other hand, while χ(0) = exp(Θ(l))χ(l) for a ReLU resnet, its
weight gradients have size independent of layer, within O(1) (Thm B.21)! This is the only instance
in this paper of gradient norm being completely preserved across layers.
The above overviews the theoretical portion of this paper. Through experiments, we discover that we
can very accurately predict whether one random initialization leads to better performance than another
on the test set, after training, by leveraging this theory we build. Residual networks of different
nonlinearities have different controlling quantities: for resnets with tanh, the optimal initialization
is obtained by controlling the gradient explosion χ(0) /χ(L) ; whereas for ReLU and α-ReLU, the
optimal initialization is obtained by maximizing s without running into numerical issues (with floating
point computation). See Section 6 for details.
Over the course of our investigation of α-ReLU, we derived several new identities involving the
associated kernel functions, first defined in [2], which relate them to the zeroth Bessel functions
(Lemmas C.31 to C.34).
5
Theoretical Results
In what follows in the main text, we assume σ• > 0 for all • = w, v, b, a; in the appendix, the formal
statement of each main theorem will contain results for other cases. We are interested in the two
major categories of nonlinearities used today: tanh-like and rectified units. We make the following
formal definitions as a foundation for further consideration.
Definition 5.1. We say a function φ is tanh-like if φ is antisymmetric (φ(−x) = −φ(x)), |φ(x)| ≤ 1
for all x, φ(x) ≥ 0, ∀x ≥ 0, and φ(x) monotonically increases to 1 as x → ∞.
Definition 5.2. Define the α-ReLU ψα (x) = xα if x > 0 and 0 otherwise. 2
By applying the central limit theorem as described in the last section, we derive a set of recurrences
for different activation/architecture pairs, shown in Table 1 (see appendix for proofs). They leverage
certain integral transforms 3 as in the following
5
Table 1: Main Recurrences
Antisymmetric/RRN
Any/FRN
2
q = σw
p + σb2
p = Vφ(q) + p
2
q = σw
p + σb2
p = σv2 Vφ(q) + σa2 + p
2
λ = σw
γ + σb2
γ = Wφ(q, λ) + γ
2
λ = σw
γ + σb2
γ = σv2 Wφ(q, λ) + σa2 + γ
2
χ = (σw
Vφ̇(q) + 1)χ
Theorems B.2, B.3, B.5
2
χ = (σv2 σw
Vφ̇(q) + 1)χ
Theorems B.8, B.10, B.12
Table 2: Summary of Main Dynamics Results. Note that while χ(l) is exponential for ReLU/FRN, the gradients
with respect to weight parameters have norms (χw and χv ) constant in l (Thm B.21). Also, the χ(l) entry for
α-ReLU is for α ∈ (3/4, 1) only
p(l)
s(l)
e(l) − e∗
χ(l)
Tanh/RRN
Tanh/FRN
ReLU/FRN
α-ReLU/FRN, α < 1
Θ(l),
B.2
Θ(l),
B.4
2
Θ̌(l π −1 ),
B.4
√
exp(Θ( l)), B.6
Θ(l),
B.9
Θ(l),
B.11
poly(l),
B.11
√
exp(Θ( l)), B.12
exp(Θ(l)), B.16
exp(Θ(l)), B.17
Θ(l−2 ), B.17
Θ(l1/(1−α) ),
Θ(l1/(1−α) ),
poly(l),
exp(Θ(l)), B.20
Θ(l (1−α)(2α−1) ), B.20
B.16
B.18
B.18
α2
Definition 5.3. Define the transforms V
and Wby Vφ(q) := E[φ(z)2 : z ∼ N (0, q)] and
ρ ν
Wφ(ρ, ν) := E[φ(z)φ(z 0 ) : (z, z 0 ) ∼ N (0,
)].
ν ρ
These recurrences are able to track the corresponding quantities in practice very well. For example,
Fig. 1 compares theory vs experiments for the tanh/FRN pair. The agreement is very good for
tanh/RRN (not shown, but similar to the case of tanh/FRN with σv = 1 and σa = 0) and αReLU/FRN as well (see Fig. A.1).
As mentioned in previous sections, we seek to characterize the long term/high depth behavior of all
of the quantities defined in Section 2. To do so, we solve for the asymptotics of the recurrences in
Table 1, where φ is instantiated with tanh or α-ReLU. Our main dynamics results are summarized in
Table 2.
5.1
Tanh
Forward dynamics. When φ = tanh, p(l) and q(l) increase as Θ(l) in either RRN or FRN
(Thm B.2), as one might expect by observing that V tanh(q) → 1 as q → ∞ so that, for example in
the RRN case, the recurrence p = V tanh(q) + p becomes p = 1 + p. This is confirmed graphically
by the black lines of the leftmost chart of Fig. 1. We carefully verify that this intuition is correct in its
proof in the appendix, and find that in fact p(l) ∼ l in the RRN case and p(l) ∼ (σv2 + σa2 )l in the
FRN case.
What about γ (l) ? The middle chart of Fig. 1 shows that over time, e(l) = γ (l) /p(l) contracts toward
the center of the interval [0, 1], but from the looks of it, it is not clear whether there is a stable fixed
point e∗ of e or not. We prove that, in fact, all trajectories of e not starting at 1 do converge to a
single fixed point, but only at a polynomial rate, in both the RRN and FRN cases (Thm B.2 and
Thm B.10); we can even explicitly compute the fixed point and the rate of convergence: For FRN,
there is a unique stable fixed point e∗ < 1 determined by the equation
e∗ =
1
2
[σ 2 arcsin (e∗ ) + σa2 ],
σv2 + σa2 v π
∗
and |e∗ − e(l) | decreases like l−δ , where
δ ∗ := 1 −
1
2
σv2
p
.
π 1 − (e∗ )2 σv2 + σa2
6
Figure 1: Our equations predict the relevant quantities very well in practice. These plots make the comparison
between prediction and measurements for the full resnet with tanh activation, with σv2 = 1.5, σa2 = .5,
2
σw
= 1.69, σb2 = .49. Left-to-right: (a) p(l) and γ (l) against layer l for 200 layers. (b) e(l) = γ (l) /p(l)
against l for 200 layers. Both (a) and (b) trace out curves for different initial conditions. (c) Different gradient
quantities against l for 50 layers. From left to right the layer number l decreases, following the direction of
backpropagation. Notice that the gradient increases in norm as l → 1. All three figures exhibit smooth curves,
which are theoretical estimates, and irregular curves with shades around them, which indicate empirical means
and standard deviations (both of which taken in regular scale, not log scale). (a) and (b) are made with 20 runs
of resnets of width 1000. (c) is made with 25 runs of resnets of width 250.
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
1-
2
π
0.2
*
δ*
0.0
0
1
2
3
4
σa /σv
∗
Figure 2: Left-to-right: (a) Plots of e∗ and δ ∗ against σa /σv . (b) In log-log scale: the dashed line is l−δ −1 ,
and the colored lines are e(l) − e(l−1) for different initial conditions e(0) . That they
√become parallel at about
∗
l = 400 on verifies that e(l) = Θ(l−δ ). 4 (c) In log-log scale: The dashed line is A l (A given in Thm B.13),
and the colored lines are log(•(1) /•(l) ) for • = χ, χb , χw . That they all converge together starting around
l = 1000 indicates that the approximation in Thm B.13 is very good for large l.
Since e∗ < 1, s = (1 − e)p = Θ(p) = Θ(l). The case of RRN can be viewed as a special case
of the above, setting σv2 = 1 and σa2 = 0, which yields e∗ = 0 and δ ∗ = 1 − π2 . We observe that
both e∗ and δ ∗ only depend on the ratio ρ := σa /σv , so in Fig. 2 we graph these two quantities as
a function of ρ. e∗ and δ ∗ both increase with ρ and asymptotically approach 1 and 1/2 respectively
from below. When ρ = σa = 0, e∗ = 0 and δ ∗ = 1 − π2 . Thus the rate of convergence at its slowest
for tanh/FRN is δ ∗ = 1 − π2 ≈ 0.36338, where asymptotically the network tends toward a chaotic
regime e∗ = 0, corresponding to a large weight variance and a small bias variance; it at its fastest is
δ ∗ = 1/2, where asymptotically the network tends toward a stable regime e∗ = 1, corresponding to
∗
a large bias variance and small weight variance. We verify δ ∗ by comparing e(l) − e(l−1) to l−δ −1
∗
∗
in log-log scale. If e(l) = Θ(l−δ ), then e(l) − e(l−1) = Θ(l−δ −1 ) and should obtain the same
∗
slope as l−δ −1 as l → ∞. The middle figure of Fig. 2 ascertains that this is indeed the case, starting
around layer number 400.
Backward dynamics. Finally, we show that the gradient is approximated by
√
√
χ(m) = exp(A( l − m) + O(log l − log m))χ(l)
(?)
q
q
σ2 σ
where A = 43 π2 σw in the RRN case and A = 43 π2 √ v2 w 2 in the FRN case (Thm B.6 and
σv +σa
Thm B.13). The rightmost plot of Fig. 2 verifies that indeed, for large l ≥ 1000, this is a very good
approximation. This demonstrates that the mean field assumption of independent backpropagation
weights is very practical and convenient even for residual networks.
7
Note that in the FRN case, the constant A can be decomposed into A =
σa2 /σv2 )−1/2 .
4
3
q
2
π
· σv · σw · (1 +
∗
Consider the ratio ρ := σa /σv . If ρ 1, then e ≈ 1 (Fig. C.17), meaning that the
typical network essentially computes a constant function, and thus unexpressive; at the same time,
large ρ makes A small, and thus ameliorating the gradient explosion problem, making the network
more trainable. On the other hand, if ρ 1, then e∗ ≈ 0 (Fig. C.17), the typical network can tease
out the finest differences between any two input vectors, and a final linear layer on top of such a
network should be able to express a wide variety of functions [9]; at the same time, small ρ increases
A, worsening the gradient explosion problem, making the network less trainable. This is the same
expressivity-trainability tradeoff discussed in [11].
5.2
α-ReLU
Forward dynamics. As with the tanh case, to deduce the asymptotic behavior of random α-ReLU
resnets, we need to understand the transforms Vψα and Wψα . Fortunately, Vψα has a closed form,
and Wψα has been studied before [2]. In particular, if α > − 12 , then Vψα (q) = cα qα , where
cα is a constant with a closed form given by Lemma B.15. In addition, by [2], we know that
Wψα (q, cq) = Vψα (q)Jα (c) for Jα given in Appendix C.7.1. Fig. C.17 shows a comparison of Jα
for different αs along with the identity function.
2
Substituting in cα qα for Vψα , we get a difference equation p − p = σv2 cα (σw
p + σb2 )α + σa2
governing the evolution of p. This should be reminiscent of the differential equation Ṗ (l) = CP (l)α ,
which has solution ∝ l1/(1−α) for α < 1, and ∝ exp(Cl) when α = 1. And indeed, the solutions p(l)
to these difference equations behave asymptotically exactly like so (Thm B.16). Thus ReLU behaves
2
very explosively compared to α-ReLU with α < 1. In fact, in simulations, for σw
= 1.69 and
2
σv = 1.5, the ReLU resnets overflows into infs after around 100 layers, while there’s no problem
from any other kind of networks we consider.
Regardless, α-ReLU for all α massages e(l) toward a fixed point e∗ that depends on α. When
φ = ψ1 , the standard ReLU, e(l) converges to 1 asymptotically as Cl−2 for an explicit constant C
depending on σv and σw only (Thm B.17), so that s = (1 − e)p = Θ(l−2 exp(Θ(l))) = exp(Θ(l)).
When φ = ψα for α < 1, then e(l) converges to the nonunit fixed point e∗ of Jα at a rate of Θ̌(l−µ ),
where µ = (1 − J̇α (e∗ ))/(1 − α) is independent of the variances (Thm B.18), so that s = Θ(p).
These rates are verified in Fig. A.2.
Backward dynamics. Finally, we have also characterized the rate of gradient growth for any
α ∈ ( 34 , 1].5 In the case of α = 1, the dynamics of χ is exponential, the same as that of p,
2
+ 1. For α ∈ ( 34 , 1), the dynamics is polynomial, but
χ(l−m) = χ(l) B m where B = 12 σv2 σw
with different exponent in general from that of the forward pass: χ(l−m) = Θ(1)χ(l) (l/(l − m))R
α2
for R = (1−α)(2α−1)
, where the constants in Θ(1) do not depend on l or m. This exponent R is
3
minimized on α ∈ [ 4 , 1) at α = 3/4, where R = 9/2 (but on α ∈ ( 12 , 1) it is minimized at α = 2/3,
where R = 4); see Fig. B.8. These exponents are verified empirically in Fig. A.2.
Looking only at χ and the gradients against the biases, it seems that ReLU suffers from a dramatic
case of exploding gradients. But in fact, because χ gains a factor of B moving backwards while p
(l−m)
(l−m)
loses a factor of B, the gradient norm χw
(and similarly for χv
) is independent of how far,
m, the gradient has been propagated (Thm B.21) — this is certainly the best gradient preservation
among all of the models considered in this paper. Thus strangely, random ReLU FRN exhibits both
the best (constant for v and w) and the worse (exponential for a and b) gradient dynamics. This begs
the question, then, is this a better deal than other α-ReLU for which for any learnable parameter we
have at most a polynomial blowup with depth in its gradient? Our experiments (discussed below)
show that α-ReLU is useful to the extent that smaller α avoids numerical issues with exponentiating
forward and backward dynamics, but the best performance is given by the largest α that avoids them
(Fig. 3(c, d)); in fact, the metric expressivity s, determines performance, not gradient explosion (see
α-ReLU experiments).
8
250
250
200
200
150
150
100
100
50
50
0.5
1.0
σw2
1.5
2.0
200
150
L
300
L
L
300
100
50
0.5
1.0
σw2
1.5
2.0
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6
σa2 /σv2
300
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
200
L
100
50
40
30
20
10
0.05
0.10 0.15
0.25
0.50
1.00 1.50
2
σw
2
Figure 3: From left to right, top to bottom: (a) and (b): σw
, L, and test set accuracy of a grid of tanh reduced
(left) and full (right) resnets trained on MNIST. Color indicates performance, with ligher colors indicating
higher accuracy on test set. Other than the values on the axes, we have fixed σb2 = σa2 = 12 and σv2 = 1. The
2
white dotted lines are given by σw
L = C, where C = 170 on the left and C = 145 on the right. We see
that both dotted lines
accurately
predict
the largest optimal σw for each depth L. (c) Varying the ratio σa2 /σv2
p
2
2
while fixing σv / 1 + σa /σv , and thus fixing A, the leading constant of log χ(0) /χ(L) . (d) in log-log scale:
2
Heatmap gives the test accuracies of ReLU FRN for varying σw
and L. Curves give level sets for the log
(L)
(0)
(L)
(0)
(0)
(L)
2
ratios log s /s ≈ log p /p ≈ log χ /χ
= L log(1 + σv2 σw
/2). (e) Red heatmap shows the test
accuracies of a grid of α-ReLU FRN with varying α and L as shown, but with all σ• s fixed. The white dashed
α2
curve gives a typical contour line of LR = const, where R = (1−α)(2α−1)
. The yellow-to-blue curves form a
set of level curves for s(l) = p(l) − γ (l) = const, with yellow curves corresponding to higher levels.
6
Experimental Results
Our experiments show a dichotomy of what matters in initialization: for tanh resnets, quality of
an initialization is determined by how much gradient explosion there is (measured by χ(0) /χ(L) );
for (α-)ReLU resnets, it is determined by how expressive the random network is (measured by the
metric expressivity s(L) ). We hypothesize this is because in tanh
√ resnets, the gradient dynamics is
much more explosive than the expressivity dynamics (exp(Θ( l)) vs Θ(l)), whereas for ReLU it’s
somewhat the opposite (χw , χv = Θ(1) vs s = exp(Θ(l))).
Tanh, vary σw . We train a grid of reduced and full tanh resnets on MNIST, varying the variance
2
σw
and the number of layers (for FRN we fix σv = 1). The results are indicated in Fig. 3(a, b).
We see that in either model, deeper resnets favor much smaller σw than shallower ones. The white
dotted lines in Fig. 3(a, b) confirm our√theory: according to Eq. (?), for the same gradient ratio
R = χ(0) /χ(L) , we want log R ≈ σw L. Indeed, the white dotted lines in Fig. 3(a, b) trace out
such a level curve and it remarkably pinpoints the largest σw that gives the optimal test set accuracy
for each depth L. Why isn’t the best initialization given by R = 1 ⇐⇒ σw = 0? We believe that
when L and/or σw is small, gradient dynamics no longer dominates the initialization quality because
it has “less room to explode,” and expressivity issues start to dampen the test time performance.
Tanh, vary σa2 /σv2 . As suggested in the analysis of Eq. (?), the ratio ρ2 = σa2 /σv2 determines the
fixed point e∗ and its convergence rate by itself while also contributes to the rate of gradient explosion
in tanh
p FRN. We seek to isolate its effect on forward dynamics by varying σv with ρ such that
σv / 1 + ρ2 is kept constant, so that the leading term of the log gradient ratio is kept approximately
equal for each L and ρ. Fig. 3(c) shows the test accuracies of a grid of tanh FRN initialized with
such an ensemble of σ• s. What stands out the most is that performance is maximized essentially
9
around a fixed value of L regardless of ρ, which shows that indeed gradient dynamics determines the
initialization quality in tanh resnets. There is also a minor increase in performance with increasing ρ
regardless of L; this is counterintuitive as increasing ρ means “decreasing expressivity.” It is currently
not clear what accounts for this effect.
2
∈ [0, 1.5] while fixing
ReLU, vary σw We train a grid of ReLU FRN on MNIST, varying σw
1
2
2
2
σv = 1, σa = σb = 2 . The resulting test set accuracies are shown in Fig. 3(d). The dark upper
region signifies failure of training caused by numerical issues with exploding activation and gradient
norms: This corresponds to the region where p(L) , which is a measure of the mean magnitude of
an neuronal activation in layer L, becomes too big. We see that the best test accuracies are given
by depths just below where these numerical issues occur. However, if we were to predict that the
optimal init is the one minimizing χ(0) /χ(L) ≥ 1, then we would be wrong — in fact it is exactly
the opposite. In this case, the dynamics of s(l) , p(l) , and χ(0) /χ(l) are approximately the same (all
exp(Θ(l)) with the same hidden constants), and optimal performance corresponds to the highest s(L) ,
p(L) , and χ(0) /χ(L) without running into infs.
α-ReLU, vary α. We similarly trained a grid of α-ReLU FRN on MNIST, varying only α and the
depth, fixing all σ• . Fig. 3(e) shows their test accuracies. We see similar behavior to ReLU, where
when the net is too deep, numerical issues doom the training (black upper right corner), but the best
performance is given by L just below where this problem occurs. In this case, if we were to predict
optimality based on minimizing gradient explosion, we would be again wrong, and furthermore, the
contour plot of χ(0) /χ(L) (white dashed line) now gives no information at all on the test set accuracy.
In contrast, the contours for s(l) succeeds remarkably well at this prediction (yellow/green lines).6
By interpolation, this suggests that indeed in the ReLU case, it is expressivity, not trainability, which
determines performance at test time.
In all of our experiments, we did not find e dynamics to be predictive of neural network performance.
7
Conclusion
In this paper, we have extended the mean field formalism developed by [9, 10, 11] to residual
networks, a class of models closer to practice than classical feedforward neural networks as were
investigated earlier. We proved and verified that in both the forward and backward passes, most
of the residual networks discussed here do not collapse their input space geometry or the gradient
information exponentially. We found our theory incredibly predictive of test time performance despite
saying nothing about the dynamics of training. In addition, we overwhelmingly find, through theory
and experiments, that an optimal initialization scheme must take into account the depth of the residual
network. The reason that Xavier [4] or He [5] scheme are not the best for residual networks is in
fact not that their statistical assumptions are fragile — theirs are similar to our mean field theoretic
assumptions, and they hold up in experiments for large width — but rather that their structural
assumptions on the network break very badly on residual nets.
Open Problems. Our work thus have shown that optimality of initialization schemes can be
very unstable with respect to architecture. We hope this work will form a foundation toward a
mathematically grounded initialization scheme for state-of-the-art architectures like the original He et
al. residual network. To do so, there are still two major components left to study out of the following
three: 1. Residual/skip connection 2. Batchnorm 3. Convolutional layers. Recurrent architectures and
attention mechanisms are also still mostly unexplored in terms of mean field theory. Furthermore,
many theoretical questions still yet to be resolved; the most important with regard to mean field theory
is: why can we make Axioms 3.1 and 3.2 and still be able to make accurate predictions? We hope to
make progress on these problems in the future and encourage readers to take part in this effort.
10
Acknowledgments
Thanks to Jeffrey Ling for early exploration experiments and help with the initial draft. Thanks to
Felix Wong for offering his wisdom and experience working in statistical physics.
References
[1] Nils Bertschinger and Thomas Natschlger. Real-time computation at the edge of chaos in
recurrent neural networks. Neural Computation, 16(7):1413–1436, July 2004. ISSN 0899-7667.
doi: 10.1162/089976604323057443.
[2] Youngmin Cho and Lawrence K. Saul. Kernel methods for deep learning. In Advances in
neural information processing systems, pages 342–350, 2009. URL http://papers.nips.
cc/paper/3628-kernel-methods-for-deep-learning.
[3] Amit Daniely, Roy Frostig, and Yoram Singer.
Toward Deeper Understanding
of Neural Networks: The Power of Initialization and a Dual View on Expressivity.
In D. D. Lee, M. Sugiyama, U. V. Luxburg, I. Guyon, and R. Garnett,
editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 29, pages 2253–
2261. Curran Associates, Inc., 2016.
URL http://papers.nips.cc/paper/
6427-toward-deeper-understanding-of-neural-networks-the-power-of-initialization-and-a-dualpdf.
[4] Xavier Glorot and Yoshua Bengio. Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward
neural networks. In PMLR, pages 249–256, March 2010. URL http://proceedings.mlr.
press/v9/glorot10a.html.
Delving deep into
[5] Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun.
rectifiers: Surpassing human-level performance on imagenet classification.
In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pages 1026–
1034, 2015. URL http://www.cv-foundation.org/openaccess/content_iccv_2015/
html/He_Delving_Deep_into_ICCV_2015_paper.html.
[6] Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. Deep Residual Learning for
Image Recognition. pages 770–778, 2016. URL https://www.cv-foundation.org/
openaccess/content_cvpr_2016/html/He_Deep_Residual_Learning_CVPR_2016_
paper.html.
[7] Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. Identity mappings in deep residual
networks. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 630–645. Springer, 2016.
[8] Timothy P. Lillicrap, Daniel Cownden, Douglas B. Tweed, and Colin J. Akerman. Random
synaptic feedback weights support error backpropagation for deep learning. Nature Communications, 7:ncomms13276, November 2016. ISSN 2041-1723. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13276.
URL https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms13276.
[9] Ben Poole, Subhaneil Lahiri, Maithreyi Raghu, Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, and Surya Ganguli.
Exponential expressivity in deep neural networks through transient chaos. In Advances In
Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 3360–3368, 2016.
[10] Maithra Raghu, Ben Poole, Jon Kleinberg, Surya Ganguli, and Jascha Sohl-Dickstein. On
the expressive power of deep neural networks. arXiv:1606.05336 [cs, stat], June 2016. URL
http://arxiv.org/abs/1606.05336. arXiv: 1606.05336.
[11] Samuel S. Schoenholz, Justin Gilmer, Surya Ganguli, and Jascha Sohl-Dickstein. Deep Information Propagation. 2017. URL https://openreview.net/pdf?id=H1W1UN9gg.
11
Notes
1
Under simplified conditions, Daniely et al. [3] showed that there exists a fixed point for any “well-behaved”
activation function in a feedforward net. However, this result does not apply to architectures with residual
connections.
2
Note that in practice, to avoid the diverging gradient ψ̇α (x) → ∞ as x → 0, we can use a tempered version
Ψα (x) of α-ReLU, defined by Ψα (x) = (x + )α − α on x > 0 and 0 otherwise, for some small > 0. The
conclusions of this paper on ψα should hold similarly for Ψα as well.
3
Daniely et al. [3] called the version of Wφ with fixed ρ = 1 the “dual function” of φ.
∗
A more natural visualization is to graph e(l) − e∗ versus l−δ , but because of floating point precision,
(l)
e − e∗ doesn’t converge to 0, but a small number close to 0, so that the log-log plot wouldn’t look like what is
expected.
4
5
Our derivations actually apply to all α ∈ ( 21 , 1], where at α = 12 , the expected norm of the gradient diverges
within our mean field formalism. However, at α ≤ 34 , the variance of the gradient already diverges (Thm B.19),
so we cannot expect the empirical values to agree with our theoretical predictions. But in fact, empirically our
theoretical predictions seem to form an upper bound on the gradient norms (see Fig. A.1).
6
the contour for p(l) is similar, but its slopes are slightly off from the heatmap contours.
12
Appendices
A
Additional Figures
In figures appearing in the appendix, k means χ (due to legacy reasons).
1022
1017
° (0) = 0: 03
1.2
° (0) = 0: 70
1018
1015
° (0) = 1: 37
1016
°
(0)
1.0
= 2: 03
1013
° (0) = 2: 70
1014
° (0) = 3: 37
1012
α=1
1019
1.4
p (0) = 3: 40
1020
1011
0.8
ℸ (l)
109
1010
0.6
107
108
e (0) = 0: 01
0.4
106
e (0) = 0: 40
104
∂E=∂bi
∂E=∂wij
105
e (0) = 0: 21
103
e (0) = 0: 60
0.2
e (0) = 0: 79
102
101
e (0) = 0: 99
100
10-1
0.0
10
20
30
40
50
10
20
layer l
3.0
30
40
50
40
30
layer l
1e13
20
10
0
layer l
108
1.4
p (0) = 3: 40
107
° (0) = 0: 03
2.5
1.2
° (0) = 0: 70
106
° (0) = 1: 37
1.0
° (0) = 2: 03
2.0
° (0) = 3: 37
α = .9
105
° (0) = 2: 70
104
0.8
103
1.5
0.6
102
e (0) = 0: 01
1.0
0.4
e (0) = 0: 21
e (0) = 0: 40
0.5
e (0) = 0: 60
0.2
e
(0)
= 0: 79
101
100
ℸ (l)
∂E=∂bi
10-1
∂E=∂wij
e (0) = 0: 99
0.0
10-2
0.0
0
50
100
150
0
50
layer l
1.2
100
150
40
30
layer l
1e8
20
10
0
20
10
0
20
10
0
20
10
0
20
10
0
20
10
0
layer l
105
1.2
p (0) = 3: 40
° (0) = 0: 03
1.0
104
1.0
° (0) = 0: 70
° (0) = 1: 37
103
° (0) = 2: 03
0.8
0.8
° (0) = 2: 70
102
° (0) = 3: 37
α = .8
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.4
101
e (0) = 0: 01
e (0) = 0: 21
100
e (0) = 0: 40
0.2
0.2
e (0) = 0: 60
e (0) = 0: 79
ℸ (l)
10-1
∂E=∂bi
∂E=∂wij
e (0) = 0: 99
0.0
10-2
0.0
0
50
100
150
0
50
layer l
100
150
40
700000
layer l
105
1.2
ℸ (l)
p (0) = 3: 40
° (0) = 0: 03
600000
30
layer l
104
1.0
° (0) = 0: 70
∂E=∂bi
∂E=∂wij
° (0) = 1: 37
500000
° (0) = 2: 03
400000
° (0) = 3: 37
103
0.8
° (0) = 2: 70
α = .7
102
0.6
101
300000
0.4
e (0) = 0: 01
200000
e (0) = 0: 21
100
e (0) = 0: 40
0.2
100000
e (0) = 0: 60
10-1
e (0) = 0: 79
e (0) = 0: 99
0
10-2
0.0
0
50
100
150
0
50
layer l
100
150
40
layer l
105
1.2
ℸ (l)
p (0) = 3: 40
° (0) = 0: 03
35000
104
1.0
° (0) = 0: 70
30000
° (0) = 1: 37
25000
° (0) = 2: 70
30
layer l
40000
∂E=∂bi
∂E=∂wij
103
° (0) = 2: 03
0.8
102
° (0) = 3: 37
α = .6
20000
101
0.6
100
15000
0.4
e (0) = 0: 01
e (0) = 0: 21
10000
e (0) = 0: 40
0.2
e (0) = 0: 60
5000
e (0) = 0: 79
e
0
(0)
50
100
150
10-2
= 0: 99
10-3
0.0
0
10-1
0
50
layer l
100
150
40
30
layer l
16000
layer l
106
1.2
p (0) = 3: 40
105
° (0) = 0: 03
14000
1.0
° (0) = 0: 70
12000
° (0) = 1: 37
10000
° (0) = 2: 70
104
° (0) = 2: 03
103
0.8
° (0) = 3: 37
α = .55
102
8000
0.6
101
6000
0.4
e (0) = 0: 01
100
e (0) = 0: 21
4000
e
0.2
(0)
= 0: 40
10-1
ℸ (l)
e (0) = 0: 60
2000
e (0) = 0: 79
10-2
∂E=∂bi
∂E=∂wij
e (0) = 0: 99
0
10-3
0.0
0
50
100
150
0
50
layer l
100
150
40
9000
layer l
1017
1.2
p (0) = 3: 40
8000
1015
° (0) = 0: 03
1.0
° (0) = 0: 70
7000
°
(0)
ℸ (l)
∂E=∂bi
∂E=∂wij
1011
0.8
° (0) = 2: 70
5000
α = .51
1013
° (0) = 1: 37
° (0) = 2: 03
6000
30
layer l
109
= 3: 37
107
0.6
4000
105
3000
0.4
e (0) = 0: 01
e (0) = 0: 21
2000
e (0) = 0: 40
0.2
103
101
e (0) = 0: 60
1000
e
(0)
= 0: 79
10-1
e (0) = 0: 99
0
10-3
0.0
0
50
100
layer l
150
0
50
100
layer l
150
40
30
layer l
Figure A.1: Empirical vs theoretical dynamics for p(l) , e(l) , and different gradient quantities for α-ReLU, with
format similar to Fig. 1. We refer to each figure on each row from left to right as (a), (b), and (c). Note that in
the α = 1 case, figure (a) (p(l) and γ (l) for different initial values) has log scale y-axis and (a) and (b) have
x-axis ranging from 1 to 50, while for other α, (a) has normal y-axis and (a) and (b) have x-axis ranging from
1 to 200. We do so because the norm of the activation vector in a typical ReLU resnet blows up into NaN at
around layer 90, while this is not a problem for α < 1. Our theoretical predictions track the average of empirical
values closely for forward quantities p(l) , γ (l) , and e(l) for all α, but variance is extremely large for e(l) at
α = 1; it also predicts the average gradient norm accurately for α = 1 to α = .7 (despite the fact that we
should not expect so for α ≤ .75 due to exploding variance (Thm B.19)), although variance is large for α = 1 at
earlier layers (i.e. later layers w.r.t backpropagation). However it consistently and significantly overestimates the
average gradient norm for α = .6 to α = .5, where the variance is so large that one standard deviation below the
2
mean results in negative values. All plots are made with parameters σv2 = 1.5, σa2 = .5, σw
= 1.69, σb2 = .49;
only α is varied. All figures exhibit smooth curves, which are theoretical estimates, and irregular curves with
shades around them, which indicate empirical means and standard deviations (both of which taken in regular
scale, not log scale). For each α, figures (a) and (b) are made with 20 runs of resnets of width 1000. (c) is made
with 25 runs of resnets of width 250.
13
100
1033
e (0) = 0: 01
1029
e (0) = 0: 21
10-1
e (0) = 0: 40
e (0) = 0: 60
10-2
e (0) = 0: 79
e (0) = 0: 99
10-3
α = .9
ℸ (0) =ℸ (1)
(0)
(l)
Âb =Âb
1025
Âw(0) =Âw(l)
1021
lR
lR+1
1017
l ¡¹
l R ¡ ®=(1 ¡ ®)
1013
10-4
109
10-5
105
101
10-6
10-3
10-7
10-7
10-8
100
101
102
104
103
10-11
100
101
layer l
103
104
103
104
103
104
103
104
103
104
103
104
1020
e
(0)
= 0: 01
1018
e (0) = 0: 21
10-1
10-2
e (0) = 0: 40
1016
e (0) = 0: 60
1014
e (0) = 0: 79
1012
e (0) = 0: 99
10-3
α = .8
102
layer l
100
1010
l ¡¹
ℸ =ℸ
(0)
(1)
(0)
(l)
Âb =Âb
Âw(0) =Âw(l)
lR
lR+1
l R ¡ ®=(1 ¡ ®)
108
10-4
106
104
10-5
102
10-6
100
10-2
10-7
10-4
10-8
100
101
102
104
103
10-6
100
101
layer l
e (0) = 0: 01
10-1
e (0) = 0: 21
10-2
e (0) = 0: 60
10-3
e (0) = 0: 99
1015
e (0) = 0: 40
e (0) = 0: 79
ℸ (0) =ℸ (1)
(0)
(l)
Âb =Âb
1013
Âw(0) =Âw(l)
1011
lR
lR+1
109
l ¡¹
10-4
α = .7
102
layer l
1017
100
l R ¡ ®=(1 ¡ ®)
107
105
10-5
103
10-6
101
10-7
10-1
10-8
10-9
100
10-3
101
102
104
103
10-5
100
101
layer l
102
layer l
100
e (0) = 0: 01
e (0) = 0: 21
10-1
e (0) = 0: 40
e (0) = 0: 79
α = .6
l
ℸ (0) =ℸ (1)
1015
Âb =Âb
1011
e (0) = 0: 99
10-3
1017
1013
e (0) = 0: 60
10-2
109
¡¹
(0)
(l)
Âw(0) =Âw(l)
lR
lR+1
l R ¡ ®=(1 ¡ ®)
107
10-4
105
10-5
103
101
10-6
10-1
10-7
10-8
100
10-3
101
102
104
103
10-5
100
101
layer l
102
layer l
100
e (0) = 0: 01
1023
e (0) = 0: 21
10-1
e (0) = 0: 60
e (0) = 0: 79
e (0) = 0: 99
(l)
Âb =Âb
Âw(0) =Âw(l)
1017
lR
lR+1
1014
l R ¡ ®=(1 ¡ ®)
l ¡¹
10-3
α = .55
ℸ (0) =ℸ (1)
(0)
1020
e (0) = 0: 40
10-2
1011
108
10-4
105
10-5
102
10-1
10-6
10-4
10-7
100
101
102
104
103
10-7
100
101
layer l
102
layer l
100
e (0) = 0: 01
e (0) = 0: 21
10-1
e (0) = 0: 40
10-2
α = .51
e (0) = 0: 60
e (0) = 0: 79
e (0) = 0: 99
l ¡¹
10-3
1070
ℸ (0) =ℸ (1)
1062
Âb =Âb
1054
Âw(0) =Âw(l)
1046
lR
lR+1
1038
l R ¡ ®=(1 ¡ ®)
(0)
(l)
1030
1022
1014
10-4
106
10-2
10-5
10-10
10-18
10-6
10-26
10-7
100
101
102
103
layer l
104
10-34
100
101
102
layer l
Figure A.2: We verify the exponents of the forward and backward dynamics for α-ReLU FRN. For each row,
the figures are labeled (a) and (b) from left to right. The format is the same as in Fig. C.17. All figures are
in log-log scale. (a) We exhibit our theoretical dynamics of the cosine distance e(l) based on the recurrences
Thm B.8 and Thm B.10 for different initial conditions e(0) . We draw |e(l) − e(l−1) | for each of these dynamics
in colored solid lines. We predict that each dynamic is Θ̌(l−µ ), where µ = (1 − J̇α (e∗ ))/(1 − α), and the
dashed line gives l−µ−1 (Thm B.18), shifted vertically to better compare the slope in log scale (i.e. the exponent
of the polynomial dynamics). (See footnote 4 for why we plot the dynamics this way). We see that the our
asymptotic prediction is very accurate for the sequence of e(l) that starts with e(0) = 0.99, the closest to e∗ for
each α, while other lines only slowly converge to the same exponent (which is the slope in the log-log plot).
This is to be expected based on the proof of Thm B.18. For α = .9, the e(0) = .99 line upticks at around 103
and then turn into NaNs due to numerical instability. (b) Colored lines are •(0) /•(l) for • = χ, χb , χw (we are
not taking logs in addition to plotting in log-log scale like in Fig. C.15). The dashed lines are our asymptotic
predictions for the dynamics with corresponding colors, based on Thm B.21, again shifted appropriately to
easily compare slope visually. We see that for every alpha our asymptotic predictions are highly accurate. For
both (a) and (b), we did not show α = 1 case as ReLU FRN runs into numerical issues quickly (i.e. with even
for 100 layers) because of exponential explosions in p(l) and χ(l) as predicted by Thms B.16 and B.20, so
we cannot expect to empirically verify the precise predicted asymptotics. All plots are made with parameters
2
σv2 = 1.5, σa2 = .5, σw
= 1.69, σb2 = .49; only α is varied.
14
Table A.1: Glossary of Symbols. “Mean normalized” is abbreviated “m.n.”
B
Symbol
Meaning
Ref
σ•
x(l)
h(l)
N
p(l)
q(l)
γ (l)
λ(l)
s(l)
e(l)
e∗
c(l)
χ(l)
(l)
χ•
φ
ψα
V
W
δ∗
A
R
Jα
standard deviation of trainable parameter •
activation vector/input vector
hidden vector
width (same across all layers)
m.n. squared length of activation vector x(l)
m.n. squared length of hidden vector h(l)
m.n. dot product x(l) · x(l)0
m.n. dot product h(l) · h(l)0
m.n. squared distancepkx(l) − x(l)0 k2
cosine distance γ (l) / p(l) p(l)0
limit value of e(l) as lp→ ∞
cosine distance λ(l) / q(l) q(l)0
m.n. gradient squared norm w.r.t. x(l)
m.n. gradient squared norm w.r.t. trainable parameter •
variable nonlinearity R → R
α-ReLU
variance integral transform
covariance integral transform
∗
e(l) converges like Θ(l−δ ) in tanh FRN
leading coeff of log χ(0) /χ(L) in tanh FRN
log χ(0) /χ(L) ∼ R log L for (α < 1)-ReLU
kernel function of α-ReLU
3.3
3.3
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.5
3.5
5.2
5.3
5.3
B.11
B.13
B.20
C.30
A Listing of Main Theorems
B.1
B.1.1
Tanh
Reduced Residual Network
Lemma B.1. Suppose φ is antisymmetric. Then in an RRN, p and q satisfy the recurrence
2
q = σw
p + σb2
p = Vφ(q) + p.
Theorem B.2. Suppose φ is tanh-like. Assume RRN architecture.
• If σw = 0, then p(l) = lVφ(σb2 ) + p(0) and q(l) = σb2 .
2
• If σw > 0, liml→∞ p(l) /l = 1 and liml→∞ q(l) /(σw
l) = 1. If φ = tanh, then we can
obtain more terms of the asymptotic expansions:
−1 1/2
−2
p(l) = l − 2Cσw
l − C 2 σw
log l + O(1)
2
q(l) = σw
l − 2Cσw l1/2 − C 2 log l + O(1)
p
as l → ∞, where C = 2/π.
Theorem B.3. Suppose φ is antisymmetric. Then in an RRN, λ and γ satisfy the recurrence
2
λ = σw
γ + σb2
γ = Wφ(q, λ) + γ.
Theorem B.4. Suppose φ is a tanh-like nonlinearity in an RRN. Assume e(0) < 1.
• If σw = 0, then γ (l) = lWφ(σb2 , σb2 ) + γ (0) = lVφ(σb2 ) + γ (0) and λ(l) = σb2 , so that
e(l) → 1 and 1 − e(l) = Θ(l−1 ). As a result, s(l) = p(l) (1 − e(l) ) = Θ(1).
15
2
2
• If σw > 0, then γ (l) = Θ̌(l π ), and e(l) → 0 like Θ̌(l π −1 ). Thus s(l) = Θ(p(l) ) = Θ(l).
Theorem B.5. For any nonlinearity φ in an RRN, under assumptions Axiom 3.1 and Axiom 3.2,
whenever φ̇2 (ζ) has finite variance for Gaussian variable ζ,
2
χ = (σw
Vφ̇(q) + 1)χ,
χb = χVφ̇(q),
χw = χVφ̇(q)p.
Theorem B.6. For φ = tanh in an RRN,
• If σw = 0, χ(m) = χ(l) for all l, m.
• If σw > 0,
√
√
log(χ(m) /χ(l) ) = A( l − m) + B(log l − log m) + O(1)
q
4
2 4
where A = 43 π2 σw and B = 3π
− σw
9π .
Theorem B.7. Suppose φ = tanh. Then in an RRN
(l)
(l)
• If σw = 0, χb = χ(L) Vφ̇(σb2 ) and χw = χ(L) Vφ̇(σb2 )((l − 1)Vφ(σb2 ) + p(0) ), where L
is the last layer.
• If σw > 0,
√
√
(l)
/χb ) = A( l − m) + Bb (log l − log m) + O(1)
√
√
(l)
log(χ(m)
m) + Bw (log l − log m) + O(1)
w /χw ) = A( l −
q
where A = 43 π2 σw (same as A in Thm B.6) and Bb = B + 12 , Bw = B − 12 , with
(m)
log(χb
B=
B.1.2
4
3π
2 4
− σw
9π (same as B in Thm B.6).
Full Residual Network
Theorem B.8. For any nonlinearity φ in an FRN,
2
q = σw
p + σb2
p = σv2 Vφ(q) + σa2 + p
Theorem B.9. Suppose φ is tanh-like. Assume the FRN architecture.
• If σw = 0, then p(l) = (σv2 Vφ(σb2 ) + σa2 )l + p(0) , and q(l) = σb2 .
• If σw > 0, then p(l) = b0 l + b1 l1/2 + b2 log l + O(1), where
b0 = σv2 + σa2
−2Cσ 2 σ −1
b1 = p v w
σv2 + σa2
b2 =
and C =
q
2
π.
−2
−C 2 σv4 σw
(σv2 + σa2 )2
2
2
2
Additionally, q(l) = σw
b0 l + σw
b1 l1/2 + σw
b2 log l + O(1).
Theorem B.10. For any nonlinearity φ, in an FRN
2
λ = σw
γ + σb2
γ = σv2 Wφ(q, λ) + σa2 + γ
Theorem B.11. Assume φ = tanh in an FRN. Suppose e(0) < 1.
• If σw = 0, then λ(l) = σb2 and γ (l) = l(σv2 Wφ(σb2 , σb2 ) + σa2 ) + γ (0) = l(σv2 Vφ(σb2 ) +
σa2 )+γ (0) . Thus e(l) → 1 and 1−e(l) = Θ(l−1 ). As a result, s(l) = p(l) (1−e(l) ) = Θ(1).
16
400
10
5.5
p
p ¡ b0 l
b0 l
350
b1
p
p ¡ b0 l ¡ b1
l + 5: 4
p
l
b2 logl + 5: 4
5
5.0
0
4.5
−5
4.0
−10
3.5
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
−15
0
50
100
150
200
3.0
0
50
100
150
200
0
50
100
150
200
Figure B.3: Empirical verification of Thm B.9.
• If σw > 0, then e(l) converges to the unique fixed point e∗ 6= 1 determined by the equation
e∗ =
1
2
[σ 2 arcsin (e∗ ) + σa2 ].
σv2 + σa2 v π
∗
Furthermore, e(l) converges to e∗ polynomially: |e(l) − e∗ | is Θ̌(l−δ ), where
δ ∗ := 1 −
1
2
1
σv2
2
p
∈ [ − 1, )
π 1 − (e∗ )2 σv2 + σa2
π
2
Since e∗ < 1, s(l) = Θ(p(l) ) = Θ(l).
Theorem B.12. For any nonlinearity φ in an FRN, under assumptions Axiom 3.1 and Axiom 3.2,
whenever φ̇(ζ)2 has finite variance for Gaussian variable ζ,
2
χ = (σv2 σw
Vφ̇(q) + 1)χ,
χb = σv2 χVφ̇(q),
χw = σv2 χVφ̇(q)p,
χv = χVφ(q),
χa = χ
Theorem B.13. Assume φ = tanh in an FRN.
• If σw = 0, χ(m) = χ(l) for all l, m.
• If σw > 0, then for l ≥ m ≥ 0,
√
√
log(χ(m) /χ(l) ) = A( l − m) + B(log l − log m) + O(1)
where
r
2 σv2 σw
p
π σv2 + σa2
σv4
4
3
2
B=
− σw
9π σv2 + σa2 σv2 + σa2
A=
4
3
Fig. B.4 shows empirical verification of the asymptotic expansion of χ for various values of σ• s.
Theorem B.14. Suppose φ = tanh in an FRN.
• If σw = 0, then
(l)
χb = σv2 χ(L) Vφ̇(σb2 )
2 (L)
χ(l)
Vφ̇(σb2 )((σv2 Vφ(σb2 ) + σa2 )(l − 1) + p(0) )
w = σv χ
(L)
χ(l)
Vφ(σb2 )
v =χ
(L)
χ(l)
.
a =χ
• If σw > 0, then for l ≥ m ≥ 0,
17
σv = 0.6, σw = 0.8, σa = 0.7, σb = 0.3
σv = 0.7, σw = 0.9, σa = 0.3, σb = 0.2
σv = 0.8, σw = 0.4, σa = 0.5, σb = 0.6
20
10
8
8
15
ℸ
6
ℸ − √ l
4
6
ℸ
√ l + const
√ l + const
10
ℸ − √ l
logl + const
logl + const
5
ℸ
√ l + const
4
ℸ − √ l
logl + const
2
2
0
0
0
0
200
400
600
800
1000
0
σv = 0.9, σw = 0.8, σa = 0.8, σb = 0.1
200
400
600
800
1000
15.0
ℸ
10.0
√ l + const
2
logl + const
1
ℸ − √ l
7.5
5.0
ℸ − √ l
logl + const
400
600
800
1000
1000
ℸ
√ l + const
8
ℸ − √ l
6
logl + const
4
2
−1
200
800
10
√ l + const
2.5
0
600
12
ℸ
0
0.0
400
14
3
12.5
200
σv = 0.8, σw = 0.7, σa = 0.6, σb = 0.9
4
17.5
0
σv = 0.7, σw = 0.2, σa = 0.4, σb = 0.4
0
0
200
400
600
800
1000
0
200
400
600
800
1000
Figure B.4: Empirical verification of the asymptotic expansion of χ for various values of σ• s. Note that we
have chosen all small values for σ• s. For larger values, the constant term in Thm B.13 begins to dominate
(primarily because of the expansion log(1 + x) = x + Θ(x2 ) has large Θ term when x is large), and χ behaves
more like exp(Θ(l)) up to depth 1000.
√
√
(l)
/χb ) = A( l − m) + Bb (log l − log m) + O(1)
√
√
(l)
log(χ(m)
m) + Bw (log l − log m) + O(1)
w /χw ) = A( l −
√
√
(m)
(l)
log(χa /χa ) = A( l − m) + B(log l − log m) + O(1)
√
√
(l)
m) + B(log l − log m) + O(1)
log(χ(m)
v /χv ) = A( l −
q
σ2 σ
σv4
4
3
2
where A = 43 π2 √ v2 w 2 and B = 9π
−
σ
are as in Thm B.13 and
2
2
2
2
w
σ +σ
σ +σ
(m)
log(χb
σv +σa
Bb = B +
B.2
1
2
v
a
v
a
and Bw = B − 12 .
α-ReLU
Lemma B.15. If α > − 12 , then Vψα (q) = cα q α , where cα =
√1 2α−1 Γ
π
α+
1
2
.
Note that if α ≤ − 12 , then Vψα (q) is not defined (its defining integral does not converge).
B.2.1
Full Residual Network
By Thm B.8 and Lemma B.15, we have the length recurrences
2
q = σw
p + σb2
p = σv2 cα qα + σa2 + p
Theorem B.16. Suppose we have the nonlinearity φ = ψα . The in an FRN: If α = 1, then
2
p(l) = Θ((1 + σv2 σw
/2)l ), with the hidden constant depending on the initial condition. If 0 < α < 1,
1
1
1
2α
cα (1 − α)] 1−α .
then p(l) = Θ(l 1−α ). More precisely, liml→∞ p/l 1−α = [σv2 σw
Fig. B.5 empirically verifies the asymptotics for α = 1 for various σv and σw .
Similarly, by Thm B.10, if q = q0 , then
2
λ = σw
γ + σb2
γ = σv2 qα Wψα (1, c) + σa2 + γ
18
1048
2, 2
2, 1
0.5, 2
1044
1040
1036
1032
1028
1024
1020
1016
1012
108
104
100
0
10
20
30
40
50
layer l
Figure B.5: Verification of the exponential asymptotics of p(l) when α = 1. The lines of each color correspond
to different (σw , σv ) pairs, which are given in the legend. The solid lines are given by the recurrences Thm B.8,
2
and the dashed lines are given by our asymptotics (1 + σv2 σw
/2)l (Thm B.16). Note that the y-axis is in
log-scale.
0.99
0.98
0.97
0.96
0.95
e (0) = 0: 01
e (0) = 0: 21
0.94
e (0) = 0: 40
e (0) = 0: 60
e (0) = 0: 79
0.93
e (0) = 0: 99
e¤
0.92
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
layer l
Figure B.6: Verification of fixed point e∗ in Thm B.18 for α = .6. Different colors correspond to different
initial conditions e(0) , and the dashed line gives the fixed point.
2 −1
B U l]−2 for
Theorem B.17. Suppose φ = ψ1 . Then in an FRN, e(l) → 1 and 1 − e(l) ∼ [ 14 σv2 σw
√
2
2
2
B = 1+σv2 σw
/2 and U = 3π . As a result, s(l) = (1−e(l) )p(l) = Θ(l−2 exp(Θ(l))) = exp(Θ(l)).
Theorem B.18. Suppose φ = ψα for 0 < α < 1 in an FRN. Then e converges to the unique nonunit
fixed point e∗ of Jα , and |e∗ − e(l) | is Θ̌(l−µ ), where µ = (1 − J̇α (e∗ ))/(1 − α). Additionally,
s(l) = Θ(p(l) ) = Θ(l1/(1−α) ).
Fig. B.6 verifies empirically that e∗ is indeed the fixed point of e(l) . Fig. A.2 verifies empirically the
convergence rate l−µ . Fig. B.7 plots J̇α (e∗ ) and µ versus α. It certainly looks like µ = 21 (1 − α),
but we have no proof for it. Based on this conjecture, we see there is a “discontinuity” of µ at α = 1:
µ → 0 as α → 1, but for α = 1, the actual convergence dynamics has exponent −2 by Thm B.17.
Because of the following theorem, we cannot expect the equations of Thm B.12 to hold for α ≤ 34 .
Theorem B.19. Suppose we have the nonlinearity ψα in an FRN. Var(ψ̇α (ζ)2 ) diverges for any
Gaussian variable ζ with mean 0 if α ≤ 34 but is finite if α > 43 .
Theorem B.20. Suppose we have the nonlinearity ψα in an FRN. If α = 1, then χ(l−m) =
m
α2
2
χ(l) 12 σv2 σw
+ 1 . If α ∈ ( 43 , 1), then χ(l−m) = Θ(1)χ(l) (l/(l − m))R for R = (1−α)(2α−1)
,
where the constants in Θ(1) do not depend on l or m.
2
α
This exponent (1−α)(2α−1)
is minimized at α = 34 on α ∈ (3/4, 1), where the value is
α = 23 on α ∈ (1/2, 1), where the value achieved is 4) (Fig. B.8(a)).
As a corollary,
19
9
2
(and at
dα
dc
μ
(* )
0.25
1.000
0.20
0.995
0.990
0.15
0.985
0.10
0.980
0.05
0.975
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
α
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
α
Figure B.7: (a) A plot of J̇α (e∗ ) versus α. (b) A plot of the exponent µ of the dynamics of |e∗ − e(l) | (see
Thm B.18)
α
1-α
30
-1
25
-2
-R
-3
20
-4
15
-5
10
-6
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
α
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
α
Figure B.8: (a) The exponent of the polynomial gradient dynamics with respect to α-ReLU versus α. (b) The
exponent of the dynamics of χv and χw .
Theorem B.21. If φ = ψ1 in an FRN, then for l ≥ m ≥ 0,
(l−m)
χb
= Θ(1)χ(l) B m ,
χ(l−m)
= Θ(1)χ(l) B l ,
w
χ(l−m)
= Θ(1)χ(l) B l ,
v
χ(l−m)
= Θ(1)χ(l) B m .
a
2
/2.
where B = 1 + σv2 σw
If φ = ψα in an FRN, for α < 1, then for l ≥ m ≥ 0,
(l−m)
χb
α
χ(l−m)
= Θ(1)χ(l) lR (l − m) 1−α −R ,
w
= Θ(1)χ(l) lR (l − m)−R−1 ,
α
χ(l−m)
= Θ(1)χ(l) lR (l − m) 1−α −R ,
v
χ(l−m)
= Θ(1)χ(l) (l/(l − m))R .
a
Fig. A.2 verifies the backward asymptotic dynamics empirically for different α < 1. Fig. B.8(b)
α
graphs the exponent 1−α
− R in terms of α. We see that on [0.5, 1], the maximum of this exponent
is at α = 1.
C
Proofs
A brief note about notation: We use ∼ to denote both how a random variable is sampled (ex:
x ∼ N (0, 1) for a Gaussian x) and how a function behaves asymptotically, i.e. f (x) ∼ g(x) as
x → a iff limx→a f (x)/g(x) = 1. Context should be enough to differentiate between these two
cases. We in addition use ' to denote asymptotic expansion. For example, if {αi }i≥0 is a sequence
of strictly decreasing reals and {βi }i≥0 is a sequence of nonzero reals, then
X
f (x) '
βi (x − ξ)αi
i≥0
means that as x → ξ, f (x) −
PN
i=0
βi (x − ξ)αi = Θ((x − ξ)αN +1 ).
20
C.1
Preliminary Lemmas
Lemma C.1. We have
2
σw
γ + σb2
= e(1 + O(γ −1 )).
2 p + σ2
σw
b
regardless of whether e(l) = γ (l) /p(l) converges.
But suppose e(l) = γ (l) /p(l) → e∗ . If e∗ < 1, then
2
σw
γ + σb2
= e(1 + Θ(γ −1 )).
2 p + σ2
σw
b
If e∗ = 1, then
2
σw
γ + σb2
= e(1 + Θ(p−1 )),
2
σw p + σb2
where = 1 − e.
2
Proof. Write M = σb2 /σw
.
2
γ + σb2
σw
1 + M γ −1
=
e(1
+
)
2 p + σ2
σw
1 + M p−1
b
= e(1 + M (γ −1 − p−1 ) + O(p−1 (γ −1 − p−1 ))).
In any situation, γ −1 − p−1 = O(γ −1 ) because γ ≤ p, so this gives the first statement. If e∗ exists
and e∗ < 1, then γ −1 − p−1 = Θ(γ −1 ), which yields the second statement. If e∗ exists and e∗ = 1,
then γ −1 − p−1 = p−1 ((1 − )−1 − 1) = p−1 ( + O(2 )) = Θ(p−1 ).
For any function f that is (k + 1)-times differentiable in a neighborhood of 0, we have the asymptotic
expansion
k
X
dn f
zn
f (z) =
(0)
+ O(z k+1 ), as z → 0.
n
dz
n!
n=0
Since
dn
q 1/2 Vφ(q)
d(1/q)n
=
q→∞
(−1)n
√
2n 2π
Z
∞
φ2 (z)z 2n dz
−∞
whenever the RHS is integrable, we have
Lemma C.2. Suppose φ2 (z)z 2n is integrable over z ∈ R for all 0 ≤ n ≤ N + 1. Then Vφ(q) =
PN
q −1/2 ( n=0 Cn q −n + O(q −N −1 )) as q → ∞, where
Z ∞
(−1)n
√
Cn :=
φ2 (z)z 2n dz.
2n n! 2π −∞
Note that sechd (z) = Θ(e−d|z| ) for z → ∞ as long as d > 0, so that Cn from the above result
converges when φ = sechd . Therefore
P
Lemma C.3. Let d > 0. We have V sechd (q) ' q −1/2 n≥0 Cn q −n , where
Z ∞
(−1)n
√
Cn :=
sech2d (z)z 2n dz.
2n n! 2π −∞
As corollaries, we obtain the following asymptotics.
q
˙
Lemma C.4. Vtanh(q)
= 32 π2 q −1/2 + Θ(q −3/2 ) as q → ∞.
˙
= sech2 (z) and
Proof. Use Lemma C.3 along with the fact that tanh(z)
2
1
2 sech z tanh z.
21
R
sech4 z dz =
2
3
tanh z +
Lemma C.5. 1 − V tanh(q) =
q
2 −1/2
πq
+ Θ(q −3/2 ) as q → ∞.
Proof. Use Lemma C.3 along with the fact that 1 − tanh2 (z) = sech2 (z) and
tanh z.
R
sech2 z dz =
Lemma C.6. sech2 (t) ≥ exp(−t2 ) for all t, with equality iff t = 0.
Proof. The lower bound is equivalent to
2
2 ≥ et−t
2
The RHS has derivative (1 − t)et−t
/2
/2
+ e−t−t
− (1 + t)e−t−t
2
/2
2
/2
. This is 0 iff
1−t
= e−2t
1+t
which has a solution 0 and in general can only have solution t ∈ (−1, 1) (by considering the sign of
the LHS). Since each side is analytic in t ∈ (−1, 1), we expand
1−t
= log e−2t
1+t
log(1 − t) − log(1 + t) = −2t
log
(−t − t2 − · · · ) − (t − t2 + · · · ) = −2t
−2t − 2t3 − · · · = −2t
which shows that the only solution is t = 0. A simple plot shows that t = 0 is a maximum, where the
bound in question achieves equality.
Lemma C.7. Suppose φ = tanh. Then Vφ̇(q) ≥
√ 1
.
4q+1
As a sanity check, Lemma C.4 shows that Vφ̇(q) ∼ C0 q 1/2 where C0 ≈ .5319, which is above the
.5 in this lemma.
Proof. By Lemma C.6,
√
dµ(z)φ̇2 ( qz)
Z
1
dz exp(−z 2 /2 − 2qz 2 )
≥√
2π
Z
1
=√
dz exp(−(4q + 1)z 2 /2)
2π
1
=√
.
4q + 1
Z
Vφ̇(q) =
Fig. C.9 demonstrates Lemma C.7.
Lemma C.8. Let d ∈ R and 1 < M < N with N − M ∈ Z≥0 . Set Σ(M, N, d) :=
we fix M and let N → ∞,
Θ(1)
if d < −1
log
N
+
O(1)
if d = −1
d+1
N
Σ(M, N, d) =
if −1 < d < 0
d+1 + O(1)
N
−
M
+
1
if d = 0
1
1 d
d+1
max(0,d−1)
+ 2 N + O(N
) if d > 0
d+1 N
22
PN
a=M
ad . If
Vsech 2 (0; q) ¸ (4q + 1) ¡1=2
1.0
Vsech 2 (0; q)
(4q + 1) ¡1=2
0.8
f(q)
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0
10
20
30
40
50
q
Figure C.9: Illustration of Lemma C.7: Vφ̇(q) vs
purposes,
√ 1
4q+1
√ 1
4q+1
for φ = tanh. This bound is very tight, and for most
can be taken as a good approximation of Vφ̇(q).
R N +1
RN
Proof. Consider the integrals A = M ad da and B = M −1 ad da. They evaluate to A =
1
1
d+1
− M d+1 ) and B = d+1
(N d+1 − (M − 1)d+1 ) when d 6= −1 and to A =
d+1 ((N + 1)
log(N + 1) − log M and B = log N − log(M − 1) when d = −1. When d ≤ 0, we have A ≤ B
and Σ(M, N, d) ∈ [A, B]; when d > 0, B ≤ A and Σ(M, N, d) ∈ [B, A]. Thus, as N → ∞ with
M fixed, when d < −1, Σ(M, N, d) = Θ(1); when d = −1, Σ(M, N, −1) = log N + O(1); and
d+1
when d > −1, we have Σ(M, N, d) = Nd+1 + O(N d ).
Now for a > 0 and d > −1 and d 6= 0, 1,
Z a+1
z d − ad dz =
1
((a + 1)d+1 − ad )
d
+
1
a
d
= (ad + ad−1 + · · · ) − ad
2
d d−1
+ Θ(ad−2 ).
= a
2
where the hidden constants in Θ depend only on d (and in fact this term vanishes if d = 1). Thus
Z N +1
N
X
d
d
Σ(M, N, d) =
z dz −
[ ad−1 + Θ(ad−2 )]
2
M
a=M
1
d
=
((N + 1)d+1 − M d+1 ) − Σ(M, N, d − 1) + Θ(Σ(M, N, d − 2))
d+1
2
If −1 < d < 0, then Σ(M, N, d − 1) = Θ(1), so that Σ(M, N, d) =
N d+1
d+1
+ O(1). If d > 0 and d 6= 1, then Σ(M, N, d − 1) =
Nd
d ,
(N +1)d+1
d+1
+ O(1) =
so that
1
1
N d+1 + N d + Θ(N max(0,d−1) ) − N d + Θ(Σ(M, N, d − 2))
d+1
2
1
1
=
N d+1 + N d + O(N max(0,d−1) ).
d+1
2
Σ(M, N, d) =
We can obtain more terms in the expansion for higher d via the Euler-Maclaurin formula, but this
suffices for our purposes.
C.2
Dynamics Zoo
This section deduces the asymptotic behaviors of some sequences governed by recurrence equations.
For the most part, the leading term of their asymptotic expansions is as one would expect from the
corresponding differential equation. However, in some cases we need subleading terms for later
results. They require slightly more nuanced reasoning. First we present a technical lemma.
Lemma C.9. Let F : R × N → R be a function such that for a subset U ⊆ R, and for all
z, z 0 ∈ U, z ≥ z 0 =⇒ F (z, n) ≥ F (z 0 , n) for every n. Suppose sequences a(l) , b(l) , c(l) satisfy
23
• a(l+1) = F (a(l) , l) for all l;
• b(l+1) ≤ F (b(l) , l) for all l above a constant Kb .
• c(l+1) ≥ F (c(l) , l) for all l above a constant Kc .
and furthermore, a(l) , b(l) , c(l) all fall into U for l above a constant KU .
If for some m ≥ max(Kb , KU ), b(m) ≤ a(m) , then b(l) ≤ a(l) , ∀l ≥ m. Similarly, if for some
n ≥ max(Kc , KU ), c(n) ≥ a(n) , then c(l) ≥ a(l) , ∀l ≥ n.
Proof. For the first claim: b(m) ≤ a(m) =⇒ b(m+1) ≤ F (b(m) , m) ≤ F (a(m) , m) = a(m+1) .
Here the last inequality used the monotonicity of F . Induction gives the desired result.
It’s similar for the second claim, where the inductive step is c(m) ≥ a(m)
F (c(m) , m) ≥ F (a(m) , m) = a(m+1) .
=⇒
c(m+1) ≥
Lemma C.10. Suppose (l) satisfies the recurrence
(l) = (l−1) (1 +
δ
).
lβ
for some nonzero constant δ ∈ R independent of l.
• If β > 1, then (l) = Θ(1).
• If β = 1, then (l) = Θ(lδ ).
δ 1−β
• If 0 < β < 1, then (l) = exp( 1−β
l
+ Θ̃(lψ1 (1−2β) )), where ψ1 (x) = max(0, x) is the
ReLU function.
Proof. We have
log (l) = log (l−1) + log(1 + δ/lβ )
= log (l−1) + δ/lβ + Θ(δ 2 /l2β )
for large l. If β > 1, then
P
l
l−β converges, and
log (l) = log (0) − Θ(1)
(l) = Θ(1).
If β = 1, then
log (l) = log (0) + δ log l + Θ(1)
(l) = Θ(lδ ).
If β < 1, then
log (l) = log (0) +
(l) = exp(
δ 1−β
l
+ Θ̃(l1−2β )
1−β
δ 1−β
l
+ Θ̃(lψ1 (1−2β) )).
1−β
Lemma C.11. Suppose (l) = Cl−α + (l−1) (1 + δ/lβ ) for α ∈ R, C 6= 0, and δ 6= 0. Then
• If β > 1, then
– (l) = Θ(l1−α ) if α ∈ (0, 1);
– (l) = Θ(log l) if α = 1;
– (l) = Θ(1) if α > 1.
24
• If β = 1, then
– (l) = Θ(lmax(δ,1−α) ) if 1 − δ 6= α.
– (l) = Θ(lδ log l) if 1 − δ = α.
Furthermore, for β = −δ = 1, (l) ∼ l−1 if α > 2, (l) ∼ l1−α if α < 2, and (l) ∼ lδ log l if α = 2.
Proof. We can unwind the recurrence to get
(l)
=
l
X
−α
m
m=1
l
Y
δ
δ
(0)
(1 + β )
(1 + β ) +
n
n
n=1
n=m+1
l
Y
Suppose β > 1. By Lemma C.10, we get
l
X
(l) = Θ(1)
m−α + (0) Θ(1)
m=1
1−α
) if α ∈ (0, 1)
Θ(l
= Θ(log l) if α = 1
Θ(1)
if α > 1.
Now suppose β = 1. By Lemma C.10, we get
(l) =
l
X
m−α Θ(m−δ lδ ) + (0) Θ(lδ )
m=1
where the constants hidden inside the Θ are the same in every term of the sum. If α > 1 − δ, then
Pl
m−δ−α = o(m−1 ), so that m=1 m−δ−α = Θ(1), and
(l) = Θ(lδ ) + (0) Θ(lδ )
= Θ(lδ ).
On the other hand, if α < 1 − δ, then
Pl
m=1
m−δ−α = Θ(l1−δ−α ). So
(l) = Θ(l1−α ) + (0) Θ(lδ )
= Θ(l1−α ).
If α = 1 − δ, then
Pl
m=1
m−δ−α = Θ(log l). So
(l) = Θ(lδ log l) + (0) Θ(lδ )
= Θ(lδ log l).
Finally, if β ∈ (0, 1), then
δ
(l) = e 1−β l
1−β
+Θ(l1−2β )
l
X
−δ
1−β
m−α e 1−β m
+Θ(m1−2β )
δ
+ e 1−β l
1−β
+Θ(l1−2β )
m=1
The case of δ = −1 telescopes, so that the upper and lower constants hidden in Θ can both be taken
to be 1.
Lemma C.12. Suppose for some β > 0, a sequence (l) satisfies
(l) = (l−1) (1 − µ((l−1) )β /l),
Then (l) ∼ (βµ log l)−1/β .
25
(0) ∈ (0,
1
).
µ
Proof. Consider the differential equation
ẋµ = −µxβ+1
/t
µ
for constant µ has solution xµ = [β(µ log t + C)]−1/β for some constant C determined by initial
condition. Note that
−µxµ (t)β+1 /t ≤ xµ (t + 1) − xµ (t) ≤ −µxµ (t + 1)β+1 /(t + 1) = −(1 − o(t−1 ))µxµ (t)β+1 /t.
For any small enough α > 0, we apply Lemma C.9 with F (, l) = − µβ+1 /l (which is monotonic
in for small enough ), c(l) = xµ (l), and b(l) = xµ−α (l) to obtain
xµ−α (l) ≤ (l) ≤ xµ (l)
for large enough l and appropriately chosen initial conditions. This shows that (l) = Θ(log l−1/β )
Taking α → 0, we also obtain the leading coefficient (l) ∼ [βµ log l]−1/β .
Lemma C.13. Suppose a sequence u(l) is governed by the equation
u(l) − u(l−1) = A(u(l−1) + B)α ,
1
α
α
where α ∈ [0, 1) and A > 0. Then u(l) = K1 l 1−α − K2 l 1−α log l + o(l 1−α log l), where K1 =
1
1
α
[A(1 − α)] 1−α and K2 = 12 A 1−α (1 − α) 1−α −1 α.
Proof. Leading term. The differential equation
ẋA,B = A(xA,B + B)α
1
has solution xA,B (l) = [A(1 − α)(l + S)] 1−α − B for some constant S. Since ẋA,B is monotonic,
we have (writing x = xA,B for brevity)
A(xA,B (l) + B)α = ẋA,B (l) ≤ xA,B (l + 1) − xA,B (l) ≤ ẋA,B (l + 1) ≤ (A + o(1))(xA,B (l) + B)α
for large enough l. We apply Lemma C.9 with F (x, l) = x + A(x + B)α (which is monotonic in x
for large x), c(l) = xA,B (l), and b(l) = xA−,B (l) to obtain
xA−,B (l) ≤ u(l) ≤ xA,B (l)
1
for large enough l and appropriate initial conditions. Therefore lim u(l) /l 1−α ∈ [[(A − )(1 −
1
1
α)] 1−α , [A(1 − α)] 1−α ]. Taking → 0 gives the leading term.
1
1
Subleading term. Now let v (l) := u(l) − ℵl 1−a , where ℵ = [A(1 − α)] 1−α . Then we have the
recurrence
1
1
1
v (l+1) + ℵ(l + 1) 1−α − v (l) − ℵl 1−α = A(v (l) + ℵl 1−α + B)α
α
α
α
1 1−α
1
1
α
v (l+1) − v (l) + ℵ(
l
+ (
)(
)l 1−α −1 + Θ(l 1−α −2 ))
1−α
2 1−α 1−α
α
v (l+1) − v (l)
1
= A[ℵα l 1−α + α(v (l) + B)ℵα−1 l−1 + Θ((v (l) + B)l−1− 1−α )]
α
α
1
1
α
=
v (l) l−1 − ℵ(
)(
)l 1−α −1 + g(l)
1−α
2 1−α 1−α
α
for some g(l) = O(l 1−α −2 + l−1 ) and where, to get the last equation, we have used Aαα =
α
α
to cancel the l 1−α term and simplified αAℵα−1 = 1−α
.
1
1−α ℵ
α
α
For any J > 0, the differential equation v̇J (l) = 1−α
vJ (l)l−1 − Jl 1−α −1 has solution vJ (l) =
α
α
α
α
C[l(1 − α)] 1−α − Jl 1−α log l. Note that the functions FJ (z, n) = z + 1−α
zn−1 − Jn 1−α −1 and
GJ (z, n) = FJ (z, n) + g(n) is monotonic in z (for positive n). For large l, we also have v̇J (l) and
FJ (vJ (l), l) = vJ (l) + v̇J (l) decreasing in l. Thus for any > 0 and l large enough
GJ+ (vJ (l), l) ≤ FJ+/2 (vJ (l), l) ≤ vJ (l)+v̇J (l+1) ≤ vJ (l+1) ≤ FJ (vJ (l), l) ≤ GJ− (vJ (l), l).
26
Now apply Lemma C.9 with F = GK , a(l) = v (l) , c(l) = vK− , b(l) = vK+ where K :=
1
α
1
α
1 1−α
1
(1 − α) 1−α −1 α, with appropriately chosen initial conditions. This yields
2 ℵ( 1−α )( 1−α ) = 2 A
α
liml→∞ v (l) /(l 1−α log l) ∈ [−K − , −K + ] for every > 0, and there it must be equal to K. We
have thus obtained the asymptotic expansion
1
α
α
α
1 1
u(l) = [A(1 − α)l] 1−α − A 1−α (1 − α) 1−α −1 αl 1−α log l + o(l 1−α log l).
2
Lemma C.14. Suppose a sequence u(l) is governed by the equation
u(l) − u(l−1) = −A(u(l−1) + B)α ,
1
where α > 1 and A > 0. Then u(l) ∼ [A(α − 1)l] 1−α .
Proof. Similar to Lemma C.13.
Lemma C.15. Suppose a sequence u(l) is governed by the equation
u(l) − u(l−1) = A(u(l−1) + B)α + C,
1
where α ∈ (0, 1). Then u(l) = K1 l 1−α + R(l), where the remainder R(l) is
α
1
−K2 l 1−α log l if α > 2
1
R(l) ∼ (C − K2 )l log l if α = 2 and K2 6= C
C(1−α) l
if α < 21
1−2α
1
1
α
where K1 = [A(1 − α)] 1−α , K2 = 12 A 1−α (1 − α) 1−α −1 α as in Lemma C.13.
Proof. u is bounded below by the dynamics v (l) − v (l−1) = A(v (l−1) + B)α and bounded above
by the dynamics w(l) − w(l−1) = (A + o(1))(w(l−1) + B)α . By Lemma C.13, both v and w are
1
asymptotic to u(l) ∼ [A(1 − α)l] 1−α , which gives the result.
1
Now define v (l) = u(l) − [A(1 − α)l] 1−α , and similar to the proof of Lemma C.13, we find
v (l+1) − v (l) =
1
α
α
v (l) l−1 − Kl 1−α −1 + C + g(l)
1−α
α
α
α
> 1 ⇐⇒ α > 12 , then
where K = 21 A 1−α (1 − α) 1−α −1 α and g(l) = O(l 1−α −2 + l−1 ). If 1−α
α
α
−1
C + g(l) = o(l 1−α ) and we can proceed as in the proof of Lemma C.13 to find v (l) ∼ Kl 1−α log l.
α
−1
α
α
If 1−α = 1 ⇐⇒ α = 1 and K 6= C, then v (l+1) − v (l) = 1−α v (l) l−1 − (K − C)l 1−α + g(l), so
α
that the technique used in Lemma C.13 would obtain v (l) ∼ (K − C)l 1−α log l = (K − C)l log l. If
α
1
α
(l+1)
− v (l) = 1−α
v (l) l−1 + C + o(1), then by using the differential
1−α < 1 ⇐⇒ α < 2 , then v
α
equation v̇J (l) = 1−α vJ (l)l−1 + J to approximate the difference equation solution and applying
Lemma C.9 as in the proof of Lemma C.13, we obtain v (l) (l) ∼
C.3
C(1−α)
1−2α l.
Forward Dynamical Equations
Here we derive the recurrences governing the forward length and correlation quantities p, q, λ, γ.
We start with reduced residual networks.
Lemma B.1. Suppose φ is antisymmetric. Then in an RRN, p and q satisfy the recurrence
2
q = σw
p + σb2
p = Vφ(q) + p.
27
Proof. We have
X
q = hh2j i = h (wji xi + bj )2 i
i
=
hb2j i
X
X
X
2 2
hwji xi bj i + 2
hwji wli x2i i
+
hwji
xi i + 2
i
i
j6=l
But wji , wli , x, and bj form an independency, so the last two sums are 0, and the terms in the first
sum split multiplicatively. Therefore
X
2
q = σb2 +
hwji
ihx2i i
i
2
σw
p
N
2
2
= σb + σw p.
=
σb2
+N ·
For the recurrence of p, we have
p = hx2i i = h(φ(hi ) + xi )2 i
= hφ(hi )2 i + hx2i i + 2hφ(hi )xi i
As N → ∞, the coefficient wii of xi in hi has vanishing covariance, so hi and xi become independent.
Therefore hφ(hi )xi i = hφ(hi )ihxi i. Because hP
i is the sum of a large number of independent random
variables, by CLT, hi is a Gaussian with mean i hwji ihxi i + hbj i = 0 since hwji i = hbj i = 0. Our
antisymmetry assumption on φ then implies hφ(hi )i = 0. Therefore,
p = hφ(hi )2 i + hx2i i
= Vφ(q) + p
as desired.
Theorem B.3. Suppose φ is antisymmetric. Then in an RRN, λ and γ satisfy the recurrence
2
λ = σw
γ + σb2
γ = Wφ(q, λ) + γ.
Proof. Similar to Lemma B.1.
Now, for the full residual networks, the proofs are similar, but we no longer need to assume that φ is
antisymmetric because of the randomization via the extra sets of weights.
Theorem B.8. For any nonlinearity φ in an FRN,
2
q = σw
p + σb2
p = σv2 Vφ(q) + σa2 + p
Proof.
q = hh2j i = h(wji xi + bj )2 i = h(wji xi )2 i + hb2j i
2
= σw
hx2i i + σb2
2
= σw
p + σb2
p = hx2i i = h(vij φ(hj ) + xi + ai )2 i
= σv2 hφ(hi )2 i + hx2i i + σa2
= σv2 Vφ(q) + σa2 + p
where in the third equality for p, we are now using the independence of vij from all other variables to
cancel out the terms, whereas before we had to rely on φ being antisymmetric.
28
Theorem B.10. For any nonlinearity φ, in an FRN
2
λ = σw
γ + σb2
γ = σv2 Wφ(q, λ) + σa2 + γ
Proof. Similar to Thm B.8.
C.4
Backward Dynamical Equations
Here we derive the recurrences governing the gradient quantities χ and χ• for different •, all under
(l)
the gradient independence assumption. Write βi = ∂E(l) for a cost function E.
∂xi
Theorem B.5. For any nonlinearity φ in an RRN, under assumptions Axiom 3.1 and Axiom 3.2,
whenever φ̇2 (ζ) has finite variance for Gaussian variable ζ,
2
χ = (σw
Vφ̇(q) + 1)χ,
χb = χVφ̇(q),
χw = χVφ̇(q)p.
Proof. For a reduced residual network, we have the following derivative computation:
∂xi
∂hi
= δji + φ̇(hi )
,
∂xj
∂xj
∂xi
= δji φ̇(hj ),
∂hj
∂hi
= wij ,
∂xj
∂hi
= xj ,
∂wij
∂hi
= δij .
∂bj
Then
β j = βj +
X
= βj +
X
βi φ̇(hi )
i
∂hi
∂xj
βi φ̇(hi )wij
i
hβ 2j i = h[βj +
X
βi φ̇(hi )wij ]2 i
i
=
hβj2 i
+
X
hβi2 φ̇2 (hi )(wij )2 i
i
+2
X
hβi βk φ̇(hi )wij φ̇(hk )wkj i + 2
X
hβj βi φ̇(hi )wij i
i
i<k
The last two terms of the above vanish as wij is independent from wkj , hi , hk and βi , βj , βk by
Axiom 3.2, and hwij i = 0.
Therefore, applying Axiom 3.1,
2
hβj2 ihφ̇2 (hi )i + hβj2 i
hβ 2j i = σw
2
= (σw
Vφ̇(q) + 1)hβj2 i
We similarly have
X ∂E ∂xi
∂E
=
= βj φ̇(hj ),
∂bj
∂xi ∂hj
i
2
∂E
h
i = hβj2 φ̇(hj )2 i = hβj2 iVφ̇(q),
∂bj
X ∂E ∂xi ∂hj
∂E
=
= βj φ̇(hj )xi ,
∂wji
∂xi ∂hj ∂wji
i
2
∂E
h
i = hβj2 φ̇2 (hj )x2i i = hβj2 iVφ̇(q)p,
∂wji
since
∂xi
= δji φ̇(hj )
∂hj
by Axiom 3.2(b);
since
∂xi
= δji φ̇(hj )
∂hj
by Axiom 3.2(b)
In the last equation we have also used the fact that as N → ∞, hj and xi become independent (they
2
are jointly Gaussian and their correlation hwji
i goes to 0 with N ).
29
Theorem B.12. For any nonlinearity φ in an FRN, under assumptions Axiom 3.1 and Axiom 3.2,
whenever φ̇(ζ)2 has finite variance for Gaussian variable ζ,
2
Vφ̇(q) + 1)χ,
χ = (σv2 σw
χb = σv2 χVφ̇(q),
χw = σv2 χVφ̇(q)p,
χv = χVφ(q),
χa = χ
Proof. For the full residual network, we have the following derivative computations:
X
∂xi
∂hk
∂xi
∂hi
∂hi
= δji +
vik φ̇(hk )
,
= vij φ̇(hj ),
= wij ,
= xj ,
∂xj
∂xj
∂hj
∂xj
∂wij
k
∂xi
= φ(hk ),
∂vik
Again let βj =
∂E
∂xj .
∂hi
= 1,
∂bi
∂xi
= 1.
∂ai
Then
βj =
X
βi (δji +
X
i
k
X
βi (δji +
X
=
i
vik φ̇(hk )
∂hk
)
∂xj
vik φ̇(hk )wkj )
k
Thus,
hβ 2j i = h[
X
βi (δji +
X
i
vik φ̇(hk )wkj )]2 i
k
X
2
2
+
hvik
ihwkj
iVφ̇(q)hβi2 i
=
hβj2 i
=
hβj2 i(1
i,k
2
+ σv2 σw
Vφ̇(q))
where in the second equality we applied the independence argument as in the proof of Thm B.5,
leveraging Axiom 3.2, and in the third equality we used Axiom 3.1 to get hβi2 i = hβj2 i.
The other computations are similar to the proof of Thm B.12.
C.5
C.5.1
Tanh: Reduced Residual Network
Forward Dynamics
Theorem B.2. Suppose φ is tanh-like. Assume RRN architecture.
• If σw = 0, then p(l) = lVφ(σb2 ) + p(0) and q(l) = σb2 .
2
l) = 1. If φ = tanh, then we can
• If σw > 0, liml→∞ p(l) /l = 1 and liml→∞ q(l) /(σw
obtain more terms of the asymptotic expansions:
−1 1/2
−2
p(l) = l − 2Cσw
l − C 2 σw
log l + O(1)
2
q(l) = σw
l − 2Cσw l1/2 − C 2 log l + O(1)
p
as l → ∞, where C = 2/π.
Proof. The case with σw = 0 is trivial. We assume σw > 0 from here on.
p and q are asymptotically linear with l. We first show that, for any ω < 1,
l + p(0) ≥ p(l) ≥ ωl
and
2
2
σw
(l + p(0) ) + σb2 ≥ q(l) ≥ σw
ω(l − 1) + σb2 ,
30
2
so that p(l) ∼ l and q(l) ∼ σw
l.
The upper bounds are trivial, given Vφ(q) ≤ 1 for any q. We show the lower bounds for any ω < 1.
For any > 0, define ℵ by φ2 (ℵ ) = exp(−). Then
Vφ(q) ≥ exp(−) Pr[z 6∈ [−ℵ , ℵ ] : z ∼ N (0, q)]
2ℵ
≥ exp(−) 1 − √
2πq
where the second inequality follows from an overestimate of the Pr[z ∈ [−ℵ , ℵ ]] via the mode of
N (0, q).
For any q ≥ q(0) , Vφ(q) is then lower bounded by
!
p
r !
p
p
(0)
2
q
2
q(0)
1− p
q(0)
1−
φ2
= φ2
> 0.
(0)
π
2πq
Thus p(l) and q(l) are unbounded with l.
Furthermore, as q → ∞, the lower bound exp(−) 1 −
(l)
fore, for any ω < 1, p
≥ ωl and q
(l)
≥
2
σw
ω(l
− 1) +
√2ℵ
2πq
σb2 .
goes to exp(−), for any . There-
Asymptotic expansion. Now we repeat the following to get each successive asymptotic term of p(l)
(l)
and q(l) : We plug in the current
V tanh(q) = 1 − Cq−1/2 + Θ(q−3/2 )
p asymptotic form of q into(l)
Pl
(Lemma C.5), where C = 2/π. Next we take the sum q = r=1 V tanh(q(r) ), which yields
one more term in the asymptotic expansion of p than the last round. We then repeat until we get only
constant terms.
The following exhibits a trace of this procedure, where in the summation step for q(l) , we implicitly
apply
2
2
q = σw
l + o(l) = σw
l(1 + o(1))
−1 −1/2
−1 −1/2
q−1/2 = σw
l
(1 + o(1)) = σw
l
+ o(l−1/2 )
p=
l
X
1 − C(q(r) )−1/2 + Θ((q(r) )−3/2 )
r=1
=
l
X
−1 −1/2
1 − C(σw
r
+ o(r−1/2 )) + Θ(r−3/2 )
r=1
−1 1/2
= l − 2Cσw
l + o(l1/2 )
2
2
q = σw
l − 2Cσw l1/2 + o(l1/2 ) = σw
l(1 − 2Cσ2−1 l−1/2 + o(l−1/2 ))
−1 −1/2
−1 −1/2
−1 −1/2
−2 −1
q−1/2 = σw
l
(1 + Cσw
l
+ o(l−1/2 )) = σw
l
+ Cσw
l + o(l−1 )
p=
l
X
−1 −1/2
−2 −1
1 − C(σw
l
+ Cσw
l + o(l−1 )) + Θ(l−3/2 )
r=1
−1 1/2
−2
= l − 2Cσw
l − C 2 σw
log l + o(log l)
log l
2
−1 −1/2
−2 log l
q = σw
l(1 − 2Cσw
l
− C 2 σw
+ o(
))
l
l
1
log l
−1 −1/2
−1 −1/2
−2 log l
q−1/2 = σw
l
(1 + Cσw
l
+ C 2 σw
+ o(
))
2
l
l
l
X
1
log r
−3 log r
−1 −1/2
−2 −1
p=
1 − C(σw
r
+ Cσw
r + C 2 σw
+ o( 3/2 ))) + Θ(r−3/2 )
3/2
2
r
r
r=1
−1 1/2
−2
= l − 2Cσw
l − C 2 σw
log l + O(1)
which is what we want.
31
Lemma C.16. Let φ is antisymmetric. Then for τ ∈ [0, π/2],
Z
√
√
q
q
1
Wφ(q, q cos τ ) = lim
dw dw0 Υ(w, w0 ; τ )φ( √ (w + w0 ))φ( √ (w0 − w))
t→τ π sin t w0 ≥|w|
2
2
Z π
Z ∞
2
1
√
dθΣ( qr, θ; τ )
r dre−r /2
=
π 0
0
Z π
Z
1 ∞
−1 −s2 q −1 /2
dθΣ(s, θ; τ )
s dsq e
=
π 0
0
Z π Z ∞
2 −1
1
∂
=
dθ
dse−s q /2 Σ(s, θ; τ )
π 0
∂s
0
w2
1
where Υ(w, w0 ; τ ) := e− 2 ( 1−c +
φ(s sin θ)φ(s sin(θ − τ )).
(w0 )2
1+c
)
(w0 )2
1−c
1
− e− 2 (
2
w
+ 1+c
)
with c = cos τ , and Σ(s, θ; τ ) :=
Of course, in the above lemma, the limit in the first equation is only necessary when τ = 0 or
τ = π/2.
Proof. Let c := cos τ and
Γ := Wφ(q, cq) =
where Σ =
1
√
2πq 1 − c2
Z
dz exp(−zT Σ−1 z/2)φ(z)φ(z 0 ),
cq
.
q
q
cq
Our proof will have two portions: Symmetrization of the Γ integral and trigonometric change of
variables for evaluation.
−1
1
1
Symmetrization. Σ is diagonalized by Ω = √2q
,
1 1
Σ = ΩT Diag(1 − c, 1 + c)Ω.
By a change of variable w = Ωz, so that dw = q −1 dz, we have
Z
√
√
q 0
q
1
T
−1
√
dw exp(−w Diag(1 − c, 1 + c) w/2)φ( √ (w − w))φ( √ (w + w0 ))
Γ=
2
2
2
2π 1 − c
Z
√
√
(w0 )2
q 0
q
w2
1
+ 1+c )
0 − 12 ( 1−c
0
√
=
dw dw e
φ( √ (w − w))φ( √ (w + w ))
2
2
2π 1 − c2
By a change of variable swapping w with w0 , we get
Γ=−
1
2π 1 − c2
√
Z
1
dw dw0 e− 2 (
Thus
2Γ =
1
2π 1 − c2
√
Z
(w0 )2
1−c
2
w
+ 1+c
)
√
√
q
q
φ( √ (w + w0 ))φ( √ (w0 − w))
2
2
√
√
q
q
dw dw0 Υ(w, w0 ; τ )φ( √ (w + w0 ))φ( √ (w0 − w))
2
2
where
1
w2
Υ(w, w0 ; τ ) = e− 2 ( 1−c +
(w0 )2
1+c
)
1
− e− 2 (
(w0 )2
1−c
2
w
+ 1+c
)
.
Note that, by the antisymmetry of φ, the integrand K := Υ(w, w0 ; τ )φ(. . .)φ(. . .) above has the
symmetries K(w, w0 ) = K(w0 , w) = K(w, −w0 ), and is everywhere nonnegative. Fig. C.10
displays a contour plot of K for typical values of q and c. So
Z
1
Γ= √
dw dw0 K(w, w0 ).
π 1 − c2 w0 ≥|w|
32
Figure C.10: The integrand of Γ after symmetrization. Here c = .2 and q = 100 and φ = tanh.
This gives the first equation in the lemma.
Polar Coordinates. Let
√w
1−c
0
= r cos θ, √w
= r sin θ, so that
1+c
√
√
τ
w = r cos θ 1 − c = 2r cos θ sin
2
√
√
τ
0
w = r sin θ 1 + c = 2r sin θ cos
2
p
dw dw0 = 1 − c2 r dr dθ = (sin2 τ )r dr dθ.
Then
Z
w2
e−( 1−c +
A :=
(w0 )2
1+c
)/2
p
p
φ( q/2(w + w0 ))φ( q/2(w0 − w)) dw dw0
w0 ≥|w|
= sin2 τ
∞
Z
r dre−r
2
/2
0
Similarly, let
√w
1+c
π−τ /2
Z
√
√
dθφ( qr sin(θ + τ /2))φ( qr sin(θ − τ /2)).
τ /2
0
= r cos θ, √w
= r sin θ, so that
1−c
√
√
τ
w = r cos θ 1 + c = 2r cos θ cos
2
√
√
τ
0
w = r sin θ 1 − c = 2r sin θ sin
2
p
dw dw0 = 1 − c2 r dr dθ = (sin2 τ )r dr dθ,
and
Z
w2
e−( 1+c +
B=
(w0 )2
1−c
)/2
p
p
φ( q/2(w + w0 ))φ( q/2(w0 − w)) dw dw0
w0 ≥|w|
= − sin2 τ
Z
= − sin2 τ
Z
∞
r dre−r
2
/2
0
0
Z
π/2+τ /2
√
√
dθφ( qr cos(θ + τ /2))φ( qr cos(θ − τ /2))
π/2−τ /2
∞
r dre−r
2
/2
Z
τ /2
√
√
dθφ( qr sin(θ + τ /2))φ( qr sin(θ − τ /2)).
−τ /2
Thus
1
(A − B)
π 1 − c2
Z
Z π−τ /2
2
1 ∞
√
√
=
r dre−r /2
dθφ( qr sin(θ + τ /2))φ( qr sin(θ − τ /2))
π 0
−τ /2
Z ∞
Z π
2
1
√
√
=
r dre−r /2
dθφ( qr sin(θ))φ( qr sin(θ − τ )).
π 0
0
Γ=
√
33
This gives the second equation in the lemma, and a change of variables s =
√
qr gives the third.
For the fourth equality, we start from the third equality, and apply integration by parts:
Z π
Z
2 −1
1 ∞
dθΣ(s, θ; τ )
s dsq −1 e−s q /2
π 0
0
Z ∞
Z
2 −1
1 π
=
dssq −1 e−s q /2 Σ(s, θ; τ )
dθ
π 0
0
Z ∞
Z π
∞
2 −1
2 −1
∂
1
dse−s q /2 Σ(s, θ; τ )
=
+
dθ −e−s q /2 Σ(s, θ; τ )
π 0
∂s
0
s=0
Z π Z ∞
2
−1
∂
1
dθ
dse−s q /2 Σ(s, θ; τ ).
=
π 0
∂s
0
2 −1
where the last equality follows because Σ(0, θ; τ ) = 0 and e−s
q
/2
→ 0 as s → ∞.
In the following lemmas, the “2” is not important, and can be any arbitrary finite or infinite value.
Lemma C.17. Suppose a function f : (0, 2) → R is C k on (0, 2). If limx↓0 f (i) (x) exists and is
finite for every i ∈ [0, k], then f can be extended to [0, 2) such that one sided ith derivatives exist at
0 for all i ∈ [0, k].
R1
Proof. Consider f (i) (0) := f (i) (1) − 0 f (i+1) (x) dx for i ∈ [0, k − 1], which naturally is also
R
equal to f (i) () − 0 f (i+1) (x) dx for any > 0. Certainly f (i) (x) → f (i) (0) as x → 0 if this limit
exists — and by assumption it does, for 0 ≤ i ≤ k − 1. Therefore, we can define the extension of
f (i) to x = 0 to be f (i) (0) := f (i) (0). But we need to check that for i ∈ [0, k − 1].
1
lim (f (i) () − f (i) (0)) = f (i+1) (0)
→0
so that all one sided ith derivatives exist. But
Z
1 (i)
1 (i+1)
(f () − f (i) (0)) =
f
(x) dx
0
Z 1
= f (i+1) (0) +
(f (i+1) (x) − f (i) (0))I(x ∈ [0, ]) dx
0
Since limx↓0 f (i+1) (x) = f (i+1) (0), f (i+1) (x)−f (i+1) (0) is bounded for small x, and by dominated
R1
R1
convergence, 0 (f (i+1) (x) − f (i) (0))I(x ∈ [0, ]) dx → 0 0 dx = 0 as → 0. Thus
1
lim (f (i) () − f (i) (0)) = f (i+1) (0)
→0
as desired.
Lemma C.18. If f : [0, 2) → R is C k on (0, 2) and has one sided derivatives at 0 up to order k,
then
f () = f (0) + f (1) (0) + · · · +
for any i ≤ k.
34
i−1 (i−1)
f
(0) + O(i )
(i − 1)!
Proof. We have
Z
f (1) (x) dx
Z
(1)
= f (0) + f (0) +
f (1) (x) − f (1) (0) dx
0
Z Z x0
f (2) (x2 ) dx2 dx1
= f (0) + f (1) (0) +
0
0
Z Z x1
2 (2)
(1)
f (2) (x2 ) − f (2) (0) dx2 dx1
= f (0) + f (0) + f (0) +
2
0
0
..
.
Z
Z x1
Z xi−1
i−1 (i−1)
f () = f (0) + f (1) (0) + · · · +
f
(0) +
dx1
dx2 · · ·
dxi f (i) (xi )
(i − 1)!
0
0
0
f () = f (0) +
0
for any i ≤ k. It suffices then to bound the size of the integral. Since f (i) (x) → f (i) (0) as x ↓ 0 by
assumption, |f (i) (xi )| is bounded by some constant C on the integration region A := {(x1 , . . . , xi ) :
≥ x1 ≥ · · · ≥ xi } for small enough . Therefore,
Z
Z x1
Z xi−1
dx1
dx2 · · ·
dxi f (i) (xi )
0
0
0
Z
= f (i) (xi )I(~x ∈ A) d~x
≤ C|A|
= Θ(i ).
As a corollary,
Lemma C.19. If f : (0, 2) → R is smooth on (0, 2) and limx→0 f (i) (x) exists and is finite for all i,
then f can be extended to [0, 2) and be one-sided smooth at 0, and
f () = f (0) + f (1) (0) + · · · +
i−1 (i−1)
f
(0) + O(i )
(i − 1)!
for any i.
Lemma C.20. Let φ = tanh. For any fixed c, Wφ(q, cq) is smooth (infinitely differentiable) on
q ∈ (0, ∞). As a function of Q := q −1 , it can be extended smoothly to the point Q = 0, so that
Wφ(q, cq) = 0lim Wφ(q 0 , cq 0 ) + q −1 0lim ∂Wφ(q 0 , cq 0 )/∂(q 0 )−1 + · · ·
q →∞
q →∞
−i+1
+
q
lim ∂ i−1 Wφ(q 0 , cq 0 )/∂(q 0 )−i+1 + O(q −i )
(i − 1)! q0 →∞
for any i ≥ 0. Furthermore, for c bounded away from 1, the constants hidden O can be taken
independent of c.
Proof. Smoothness on (0, ∞). By the third equation of Lemma C.16, for Q ∈ (0, ∞) ⇐⇒ q ∈
(0, ∞),
Z
Z
1 ∞
∂ n −s2 Q/2 π
s ds
Qe
dθ|φ(s sin θ)φ(s sin(θ − τ ))|
π 0
∂Qn
0
Z ∞
∂ n −s2 Q/2
Qe
< ∞,
≤
s ds
∂Qn
0
so by Leibniz’s integral rule and a simple induction, all derivatives of Wφ(q, cq) against Q exists for
any Q ∈ (0, ∞).
35
k
Extension to Q = 0. By Lemma C.19, it suffices to show that the limit of ∂ Wφ(q,cq)
exists and
∂Qk
is finite as Q → 0, for all k. Let τ = arccos c. By the fourth equation of Lemma C.16, we have
explicitly
Z
Z ∞
2
1 π
∂
∂ k Wφ(q, cq)
2
=
dθ
ds(−s /2)k e−s Q/2 Σ(s, θ; τ )
∂Qk
π 0
∂s
0
Z ∞
Z
2
∂
(−2)−k π
ds s2k e−s Q/2 Σ(s, θ; τ )
=
dθ
π
∂s
0
0
for any Q ∈ (0, ∞). Note that for φ = tanh, φ̇ = sech2 ,
∂
Σ(s, θ; τ ) = sin θφ̇(s sin θ)φ(s sin(θ − τ )) + sin(θ − τ )φ(s sin θ)φ̇(s sin(θ − τ )).
∂s
∂ k Wφ
∂Qk
as follows:
Z ∞
2
∂ k Wφ(q, cq)
(−2)−k π
=
dθ
ds s2k e−s Q/2 sin θφ̇(s sin θ)φ(s sin(θ − τ ))
k
∂Q
π
0
0
Z ∞
−k Z π
2
(−2)
+
dθ
ds s2k e−s Q/2 sin(θ − τ )φ(s sin θ)φ̇(s sin(θ − τ ))
π
0
0
We show that for each piece, the limit as Q → 0 exists and is finite, for any k. This will prove the
smooth extendability of Wφ to Q = 0. We will do this for the first piece; the second is similar.
We split the integral of
Z
For Q > 0, the integrand is absolutely integrable, so we may switch the integrals.
Z π Z ∞
2
dθ
ds s2k e−s Q/2 sin θφ̇(s sin θ)φ(s sin(θ − τ ))
0
Z 0∞
Z π
2k −s2 Q/2
=
dss e
dθ sin θφ̇(s sin θ)φ(s sin(θ − τ ))
0
0
We now try to bound the inner integral by an exponentially decreasing term e−sµ for some µ; clearly,
by monotone convergence on the outer integral as Q → 0, this would show the limit of the integral
exists and is finite.
Because φ is odd and φ̇ is even, the inner integrand is negative on θ ∈ [0, τ ) and positive on θ ∈ (τ, π].
We will break up the inner integral as follows, for some fixed > 0 satisfying τ − > 0 independent
of s (recall τ ∈ (0, π/2]).
Z π
dθ sin θφ̇(s sin θ)φ(s sin(θ − τ ))
0
Z Z π
Z π−
=
+
dθ sin θφ̇(s sin θ)φ(s sin(θ − τ )) +
dθ sin θφ̇(s sin θ)φ(s sin(θ − τ ))
0
π−
2
−z
Now because φ̇(z) = sech (z) ≤ 2e , and sin θ ≥ sin on θ ∈ [, π − ],
Z π−
dθ sin θφ̇(s sin θ)φ(s sin(θ − τ ))
Z
≤2
π−
dθ exp(−s sin )
= 2(π − 2) exp(−s sin ).
For the other part:
Z
π
dθ sin θφ̇(s sin θ)φ(s sin(θ − τ ))
π−
Z 0
sin(π − θ)φ̇(s sin π − θ)φ(s sin(π − θ − τ )) d(π − θ)
=
Z
=
dθ sin θφ̇(s sin θ)φ(s sin θ + τ )
0
36
so that
Z
Z
π
dθ sin θφ̇(s sin θ)φ(s sin(θ − τ ))
+
0
π−
Z
dθ sin θφ̇(s sin θ)[φ(s sin(τ + θ)) − φ(s sin(τ − θ))]
=
0
But by intermediate value theorem, φ(s sin(τ +θ))−φ(s sin(τ −θ)) = 2θ∂φ(s sin(τ +θ))/∂θ|θ=ψ =
2θφ̇(s sin(τ + ψ))s cos(τ + ψ) for some ψ ∈ [−θ, θ]. By the assumption on , φ(s sin(τ + θ)) −
φ(s sin(τ − θ)) ≤ 2φ̇(s sin(τ − ))s cos(τ − ). Then
Z
dθ sin θφ̇(s sin θ)[φ(s sin(τ + θ)) − φ(s sin(τ − θ))]
Z 0
≤
dθ sin θφ̇(s sin θ)2φ̇(s sin(τ − ))s cos(τ − )
0
≤ 2φ̇(s sin(τ − ))s cos(τ − )O(1)
Because τ − > 0 by assumption on , and because φ̇(z) = exp(−Θ+ (z)), this quantity is
exp(−Θ+ (z)), as desired (here Θ+ denotes a positive quantity).
Thus
Z
π
dθ sin θφ̇(s sin θ)φ(s sin(θ − τ ))
Z Z π
Z
=
+
dθ sin θφ̇(s sin θ)φ(s sin(θ − τ )) +
0
0
π−
π−
dθ sin θφ̇(s sin θ)φ(s sin(θ − τ ))
= exp(−Θ+ (s))
k
Wφ
and similarly for the other piece of ∂∂Q
k , so that
Z ∞
Z π
2k −s2 Q/2
dss e
dθ sin θφ̇(s sin θ)φ(s sin(θ − τ ))
0
Z 0∞
2Q
=
dss2k e−s 2 −Θ+ (z)
Z0 ∞
→
dss2k e−Θ+ (z)
0
is finite as Q → 0, by monotone convergence.
Independence of constant hidden in O((q 0 )−i ). The constant hidden is a function of the chosen
above, which depend on τ , but only to the extent that it must satisfy τ − > 0. As long as we are
interested in a set C of c that is bounded away from 1, the corresponding set of τ is bounded away
from 0, so can be taken to be some number smaller than all of the corresponding τ .
Lemma C.21. Suppose φ is tanh-like. Then for c ∈ [0, 1],
2
arcsin(c),
π
and weakly increases to this upper bound as q → ∞. Furthermore,
Wφ(q, cq) ≤
• If c = 0 or 1, then equality holds regardless of q.
• If c ∈ (0, 1) is held constant, π2 arcsin(c) − Wφ(q, cq) = Θ(q −1 ), where the hidden
constants in Θ depend on c. But the constants can be made independent of c if c ∈ [, 1 − ]
for some > 0.
Proof. The cases of c = 0 or 1 are obvious by the definition of W. So from here on we assume
c ∈ (0, 1).
37
0.35
0.30
Wtanh(0, q, q, q cos 1)
2
arcsin(cos
π
1)
0.25
Q=
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1
q
Figure C.11: We verify empirically that the subleading term in W tanh(q, cq) is linear in q −1 , for constant c.
Indeed, observe that the curve of of W tanh intersects the y-axis at an angle.
Let τ := arccos c. By the first equation of Lemma C.16 and the assumption that φ is tanh-like, it
is immediate that Wφ(q, cq) is nondecreasing in q. By dominated convergence, using the second
equation of Lemma C.16, we get
Z
2
1 ∞
r dre−r /2 (π − 2τ )
lim Wφ(q, cq) =
q→∞
π 0
π − 2τ
=
π
2
= arcsin c.
π
Then the convergence rate is O(q −1 ) by Lemma C.20 and Taylor’s theorem. Thus to show the
convergence rate is Θ(q −1 ), it suffices to show that D := ∂Wφ(q,cq)
< 0. But this is apparent from
∂Q
the first equation of Lemma C.16: For τ ∈ (0, π/2),
Z
1
1
D=
dw dw0 Υ(w, w0 ; τ )(− √ Q−3/2 )
π sin τ w0 ≥|w|
2 2
p
p
0
× [φ̇( q/2(w + w ))φ( q/2(w0 − w))
p
p
+ φ( q/2(w + w0 ))φ̇( q/2(w0 − w))]
<0
since Υ is positive on the integration domain, and φ̇ and φ are both positive for positive arguments,
by the assumption of φ being tanh-like.
Independence of the constants in Θ(q −1 ) from c when c ∈ [, 1 − ]. By Lemma C.20, the upper
constant can be made independent from c. Since D is monotonically decreasing in c (or monotonically
increasing in τ ) and |D| is monotonically increasing in c (or monotonically decreasing in τ ), we have
|D| > |D|
, which can be taken to be the lower constant in Θ(q −1 ).
c=
Fig. C.11 verifies empirically that the subleading term in W tanh(q, cq) is linear in q −1 , for constant
c.
Theorem B.4. Suppose φ is a tanh-like nonlinearity in an RRN. Assume e(0) < 1.
• If σw = 0, then γ (l) = lWφ(σb2 , σb2 ) + γ (0) = lVφ(σb2 ) + γ (0) and λ(l) = σb2 , so that
e(l) → 1 and 1 − e(l) = Θ(l−1 ). As a result, s(l) = p(l) (1 − e(l) ) = Θ(1).
2
2
• If σw > 0, then γ (l) = Θ̌(l π ), and e(l) → 0 like Θ̌(l π −1 ). Thus s(l) = Θ(p(l) ) = Θ(l).
Proof. We have by Lemma C.21,
γ=
2
arcsin(λ/q) − Θ(q−1 ) + γ.
π
38
2
2
Since q = σw
p + σb2 by Thm B.2, and λ = σw
γ + σb2 by Thm B.3,
!
2
σw
γ + σb2
2
γ = arcsin
− Θ(q−1 ) + γ.
2 p + σ2
π
σw
b
(l)
We claim that γ (l) → ∞ as l → ∞. Otherwise, there
is some C such
that γ ≤ C for all l. For
C
(l)
large enough l, p ≥ ωl for any ω < 1 and arcsin σ2 p(l−1) +σ2 = Θ(1/l) by linearization of
w
b
arcsin. Thus γ (l) = Θ(log l), but this contradicts our assumption that γ is bounded. This proves our
claim.
Therefore, for large enough l,
2
σw
γ + σb2
= γ/p + Θ(l−1 ).
2 p + σ2
σw
b
Fig. C.12 shows π2 arcsin x vs x. One sees that 1 is an unstable fixed point; if e < 1 − , then
2
π arcsin e < 1 − − δ for some δ. Thus c drops monotonically until some threshold under which
the linearization of arcsin, arcsin x = x + Θ(x3 ), is applicable. So for large enough l,
2
arcsin(γ/p + Θ(l−1 )) − Θ(l−1 )
π
2
= γ/p + O(l−1 )
π
γ−γ =
2
2
As p(l) ∼ l by Thm B.2, this difference equation has solution γ = Ω(l π − ), O(l π + ) for any by
using the dynamics of Lemma C.11 to upper and lower bound this difference equation.
C.5.2
Backward Dynamics
Theorem B.6. For φ = tanh in an RRN,
• If σw = 0, χ(m) = χ(l) for all l, m.
• If σw > 0,
√
√
log(χ(m) /χ(l) ) = A( l − m) + B(log l − log m) + O(1)
q
4
2 4
where A = 43 π2 σw and B = 3π
− σw
9π .
Proof. The σw = 0 case is obvious. We will assume σw > 0 from here on.
q
Let p(l) = b0 l + b1 l1/2 + b2 log l + O(1). Then for D = 23 π2 , we have (implicitly applying
Lemma C.4 and Lemma C.8),
−1/2 −1/2
−1
q−1/2 = σw
b0
l
−1 −1/2
−1 −1
(1 − b1 b−1
l
− b2 b−1
l log l + O(l−1 ))
0 2
0 2
Vφ̇(q) = Dq−1/2 + Θ(q−3/2 )
−1/2 −1/2
−1
= Dσw
b0
l
−1 −1/2
−1 −1
(1 − b1 b−1
l
− b2 b−1
l log l + O(l−1 ))
0 2
0 2
−1/2 −1/2
−1
log(BVφ̇(q) + 1) = BDσw
b0
l
−3/2
−1
− (BDσw
b0
l
X
−2 −1 −1 −1
b1 2−1 + B 2 D2 σw
b0 2 )l + Θ(l−3/2 log l)
−1/2 1/2
−1
log(BVφ̇(q(r) ) + 1) = 2BDσw
b0
l
r=1
−3/2
−1
− (BDσw
b0
−2 −1 −1
b1 2−1 + B 2 D2 σw
b0 2 ) log l + O(1)
39
q
−1
−2
2
In our case, we have b0 = 1, b1 = −2Cσw
, b2 = C 2 σw
, B = σw
, C = π2 , which gives
r
l
X
4
4 2
2 4
(r)
σw l1/2 + (
− σw
) log l + O(1).
log(BVφ̇(q ) + 1) =
3
π
3π
9π
r=1
so that
(m)
χ
(l)
/χ
" r
#
√
√
4
4 2
2 4
σw ( l − m) + (
− σw )(log l − log m) + O(1)
= exp
3 π
3π
9π
Theorem B.7. Suppose φ = tanh. Then in an RRN
(l)
(l)
• If σw = 0, χb = χ(L) Vφ̇(σb2 ) and χw = χ(L) Vφ̇(σb2 )((l − 1)Vφ(σb2 ) + p(0) ), where L
is the last layer.
• If σw > 0,
√
√
(l)
/χb ) = A( l − m) + Bb (log l − log m) + O(1)
√
√
(l)
log(χ(m)
m) + Bw (log l − log m) + O(1)
w /χw ) = A( l −
q
where A = 43 π2 σw (same as A in Thm B.6) and Bb = B + 12 , Bw = B − 12 , with
(m)
log(χb
B=
4
3π
2 4
− σw
9π (same as B in Thm B.6).
Proof. The σw = 0 case is obvious. We will assume σw > 0 from here on.
As in the proof of Thm B.6,
−1/2 −1/2
−1
Vφ̇(q) = Dσw
b0
where D =
2
3
q
l
+ Θ(l−1 )
2
π.
Thus by Thm B.5,
r
√
√
4 2
4
(m)
(l)
2 4
log(χ /χ ) =
σw ( l − m) + (
− σw
)(log l − log m) + O(1)
3 π
3π
9π
r
√
√
4 2
4
1
(m)
(l)
2 4
log(χb /χb ) =
σw ( l − m) + (
− − σw
)(log l − log m) + O(1)
3 √π
3π 2
9π
Similarly, since p = l + Θ( l) by Thm B.2, we have
r
√
√
1
4 2
4
2 4
(m)
(l)
σw ( l − m) + (
+ − σw
)(log l − log m) + O(1)
log(χw /χw ) =
3 π
3π 2
9π
C.6
C.6.1
Tanh: Full Residual Network
Forward Dynamics
Theorem B.9. Suppose φ is tanh-like. Assume the FRN architecture.
• If σw = 0, then p(l) = (σv2 Vφ(σb2 ) + σa2 )l + p(0) , and q(l) = σb2 .
• If σw > 0, then p(l) = b0 l + b1 l1/2 + b2 log l + O(1), where
b0 = σv2 + σa2
−2Cσ 2 σ −1
b1 = p v w
σv2 + σa2
b2 =
and C =
q
2
π.
−2
−C 2 σv4 σw
(σv2 + σa2 )2
2
2
2
Additionally, q(l) = σw
b0 l + σw
b1 l1/2 + σw
b2 log l + O(1).
40
Proof. The σw = 0 case is obvious. We will assume σw > 0 from here on.
As in Thm B.2, p will have expansion p = b0 l + b1 l1/2 + b2 log l + O(1). Then, for C =
−1/2 −1/2
−1
q−1/2 = σw
b0
l
X
Vφ(q
r=1
(r)
)=
l
X
l
q
2
π,
−1 −1/2
−1 −1
(1 − b1 b−1
l
− b2 b−1
l log l + O(l−1 ))
0 2
0 2
1 − C(q(r) )−1/2 + Θ((q(r) )−3/2 )
r=1
−1/2 1/2
−1
= l − 2Cσw
b0
p(l) = σv2
l
X
l
−3/2 −1
−1
+ Cσw
b1 b0
2
log l + O(1)
+σa2 l
r=1
−1/2 1/2
−1
= (σv2 + σa2 )l − 2Cσv2 σw
b0
l
−3/2 −1
−1
+ Cσv2 σw
b1 b0
2
log l + O(1)
which yields
b0 = σv2 + σa2
−1/2
−1
b1 = −2Cσv2 σw
b0
b2 =
−2Cσ 2 σ −1
= p v w
σv2 + σa2
−2
−C 2 σv4 σw
(σv2 + σa2 )2
Lemma C.22. Suppose φ is tanh-like. Then
γ ≤ σv2
and
σv2
2
arcsin (λ/q) + σa2 + γ,
π
2
arcsin (λ/q) + σa2 + γ − γ = Θ(q−1 ).
π
Proof. Similar to the proof of Lemma C.21.
Lemma C.23. Let u∗ ∈ [0, 1). Let ft : [0, 1) → [0, 1] be a continuous function for each t ∈ N, to
each of which we associate two numbers 0 ≤ at ≤ u∗ ≤ bt ≤ 1. Suppose for each t, ft (u) > u for
all u ∈ [0, at ) and ft (u) < u for all u ∈ (bt , 1). Assume that for each u, ft (u) − u → 0 as t → ∞
uniformly over u. If at % u∗ and bt & u∗ , then for any u0 ∈ [0, 1), the dynamics ut = ft (ut−1 ) has
a limiting point. Furthermore, either ut → u∗ or ut eventually converges monotonically (decreasing
or increasing) to a limit point.
Proof. Fix a u0 ∈ [0, 1). If ut → u∗ then we are done. Otherwise, suppose there is a neighborhood
[u∗ − , u∗ + ] such that for an infinite sequence t1 , t2 , . . ., uti 6∈ [u∗ − , u∗ + ]. WLOG assume
uti < u∗ − for all i and (ti )i is the sequence of all ts that satisfy this inequality.
If (ti )i contains {s : s ≥ N } for some N , then for some M > N , for every t > M , at > u∗ − > ut .
By assumption, ut is monotonic for all t > M but is bounded above. Thus ut has a fixed point
û ≤ u∗ − as desired.
Now assume there are infinite is such that ti − 1 6= ti−1 (i.e. ti − 1 is not part of the sequence
(ti )i ). We will show that this case is contradictory. Take T large enough such that at > u∗ − /2
and |ft (u) − u| < /4 for all u and for all t ≥ T (T exists by premise). Let j be the smallest index
such that tj > T and tj − 1 6= tj−1 . By the definition of j, utj −1 ≥ u∗ − . If utj −1 ≥ u∗ − /2,
then by definition of T , u∗ − > utj = ftj (utj −1 ) > utj −1 − /4 > u∗ − 3/4 > u∗ − , a
contradiction. If u∗ − ≤ utj −1 ≤ u∗ − /2, then by the definition of T , utj −1 ≤ atj −1 so that
utj = ftj (utj −1 ) > utj −1 ≥ u∗ − , a contradiction.
The “furthermore” claim is clear from our proof above.
Theorem B.11. Assume φ = tanh in an FRN. Suppose e(0) < 1.
41
• If σw = 0, then λ(l) = σb2 and γ (l) = l(σv2 Wφ(σb2 , σb2 ) + σa2 ) + γ (0) = l(σv2 Vφ(σb2 ) +
σa2 )+γ (0) . Thus e(l) → 1 and 1−e(l) = Θ(l−1 ). As a result, s(l) = p(l) (1−e(l) ) = Θ(1).
• If σw > 0, then e(l) converges to the unique fixed point e∗ 6= 1 determined by the equation
1
2
e∗ = 2
[σv2 arcsin (e∗ ) + σa2 ].
2
σv + σa
π
∗
Furthermore, e(l) converges to e∗ polynomially: |e(l) − e∗ | is Θ̌(l−δ ), where
δ ∗ := 1 −
2
1
σv2
1
2
p
∈ [ − 1, )
2
2
∗
2
π 1 − (e ) σv + σa
π
2
Since e∗ < 1, s(l) = Θ(p(l) ) = Θ(l).
Proof. The σw = 0 case is obvious. We will assume σw > 0 from here on.
If σa = 0, then e∗ as defined above is 0, and e =
as before.
γ
p
2
decreases as Θ(l π −1 ) to 0, by the same reason
So from now on suppose σa > 0. We apply Lemma C.23 first to show that e converges. We have
σv2 Wφ(q, cq) + σa2 = ep − ep
= ep − ep + ep − ep
= (e − e)p + e(p − p)
p
= (p − p)[(e − e)
+ e]
p−p
p
σv2 Wφ(q, cq) + σa2
+e
= (e − e)
σv2 Vφ(q) + σa2
p−p
p − p σv2 Wφ + σa2
−e =e−e
p
σv2 Vφ + σa2
i
h
2
(l)
(l−1)
σv2 Wφ(q(l) ,c(l) q(l) )+σa
If we define fl (u) := p −p
−
u
+ u (the LHS of the above), then
p(l)
σ 2 Vφ(q(l) )+σ 2
v
a
fl (u) − u = O(l−1 ) uniformly for all u because p(l) = Θ(l), p(l) − p(l−1) = Θ(1), and the part
in the bracket is O(1), with constants all (able to be taken) independent of u. We divide [0, 1) into
the following intervals I1 = [1, 1/2), I2 = [1/2, 3/4), I3 = [3/4, 7/8), . . .. For each Ik , it is clear
that the trajectories of e(l) = fl (e(l−1) ) with e(0) ∈ Ik will fall into some interval Jk bounded away
from 1 for all l ≥ L, for large enough
h 2L2 (dependent2 on k). Theniwe can apply Lemmas C.1, C.5
(l)
(l−1)
σv π arcsin(u)+σa
and C.21 to get fl (u) = p −p
− u + o(1) + u where the constants in o(1)
σ 2 +σ 2
p(l)
v
a
is uniform for all e(0) ∈ Ik . For u < e∗ (as defined in the theorem statement),
2
σ 2 2 arcsin(u)+σa
e∗ , v π σ2 +σ2
v
a
2
2
σv2 π
arcsin(u)+σa
2
σv2 +σa
>u
< u (see Fig. C.12). Thus as l → ∞, the o(1) term gets smaller
h 22
i
2
σ
arcsin(u)+σa
and smaller, and this monotonicity holds for fl (u) − u = v π σ2 +σ2
− u + o(1) > 0 (resp.
and for u >
v
a
< 0) on larger and larger intervals [0, al ] ∩ Jk (resp. [bl , 1) ∩ Jk ). This proves all the preconditions
for Lemma C.23, which yields that Ik converges to a limit point. As this argument is independent of
k, we have that for all e(0) ∈ [0, 1), e(l) converges.
Now we solve for the limit point.
Suppose e has limit point e† (possibly different from e∗ described in the theorem); if we express
γ (l) = (e† + (l) )p(l) , then
σv2 Wφ(q, cq) + σa2 = γ − γ
= (e† + )p − (e† + )p
= e† (p − p) + p − p
p
σv2 Wφ(q, cq) + σa2
= e† + + ( − )
2
2
σv Vφ(q) + σa
p−p
42
1.0
2 sin-1 (x)
π
0.5
1.5 × 2 sin-1 (x)
π
+0.5
1.5+0.5
-1.0
0.5
-0.5
1.0
0.5 × 2 sin-1 (x)
π
+1.5
0.5+1.5
-0.5
x
-1.0
Figure C.12: Graph of y(e) =
22
1
2 +σ 2 [σv π
σv
a
arcsin(e) + σa2 ] for various σv and σa .
As l → ∞, c ∼ e → e† , and Wφ(q, e† q) → π2 arcsin(e† ), and Vφ(q) → 1. Additionally,
p/(p − p) = Θ(l) and = o(1) so that − = o(l−1 ). Then we have, taking limits l → ∞,
σv2 π2 arcsin(e† ) + σa2
= e† .
σv2 + σa2
Since fl (as defined above) repels points away from 1, the only solution for e† when e(0) < 1 is
e† = e∗ as specified in the theorem statement.
We defer the proof of the convergence rate to e∗ to Thm C.25.
Lemma C.24. Let e∗ be the stable fixed point determined by σa and σv . Then as long as σv > 0,
1
1 2
2
σv2
p
∈( , ]
2
2
∗
2
π 1 − (e ) σv + σa
2 π
Proof. Write ρ :=
2
σa
σv2 .
By definition of e∗ , we get
2
arcsin e∗ + ρ
π
e∗ − π2 arcsin e∗
ρ==
1 − e∗
Substituting ρ into the expression in question, it follows that we want to show
−1
1 − π2 arcsin e∗
2
2
1 2
∗ 2 −1/2
−1
∗ 2 −1/2
(1 − e )
(1 + ρ) = (1 − e )
∈( , ]
∗
π
π
1−e
2 π
e∗ = (1 − ρ)
for e∗ ∈ [0, 1) (the endpoint at 1 is not included since σv > 0. But this is
2
2
(1 − e∗ )1/2 (1 + e∗ )−1/2 (1 − arcsin e∗ )−1 .
π
π
Set g(e∗ ) to be this expression. We could proceed by finding critical points, but a simple plot
Fig. C.13 shows that g is decreasing on [0, 1), with extremal values at the end points:
g(e∗ ) ∈ [ lim
g(e∗ ), g(0)),
∗
e →1
for e∗ ∈ [0, 1).
√
For the limit, we note that arcsin e∗ has an asymptotic expansion π2 − 2(1 −
π
1
e)1/2 + Θ((1 − e)3/2 ) at 1, so that (1 − e∗ )1/2 (1 − π2 arcsin e∗ )−1 → √ , and g(e∗ ) → as
2
2 2
e∗ → 1.
Obviously g(0) =
2
π.
Theorem C.25. If e(0) < 1, then |e(l) − e∗ | is Ω(l−δ
δ ∗ := 1 −
∗
−ε
σv2
) and O(l−δ
∗
+ε
) for any ε > 0, where
2
1
2 1
p
∈ [1 − , ),
π 1 − (e∗ )2 σv2 + σa2
π 2
where the bounds on the right follow from Lemma C.24.
43
0.64
0.62
0.60
g[* ]
0.58
1
2
0.56
2
π
0.54
0.52
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
*
Figure C.13: Plot of g(e∗ ) in the proof of Lemma C.24
Proof. Define ω(q, c) = π2 arcsin(c) − W tanh(q, cq). By Lemma C.21, for large enough l, c is
close to e∗ bounded away from 0 or 1, so that ω(q, c) = Θ(q−1 ) with the constant hidden in Θ
independent of c. Additionally, by Lemma C.5, 1 − V tanh(q) = Θ(q−1/2 ). Therefore,
2
arcsin(e∗ + ) − ω(q, c)) + σa2 + γ
π
2
+ Θ(2 )] − Θ(l−1 ) + σa2 + γ
= σv2 [arcsin(e∗ ) + p
π
1 − (e∗ )2
2
= e∗ (σv2 + σa2 ) + (e∗ + )p + σv2 p
+ Θ(2 ) − Θ(l−1 )
π 1 − (e∗ )2
2
e∗ (p − p − σv2 − σa2 ) = p − p + σv2 p
+ Θ(2 ) − Θ(l−1 )
π 1 − (e∗ )2
2
e∗ σv2 (Vφ(q) − 1) = p − p + σv2 p
+ Θ(2 ) − Θ(l−1 )
π 1 − (e∗ )2
1
2
1
= (e∗ σv2 (1 − Vφ(q)) + Θ(2 ) − Θ(l−1 ) + (p + σv2 p
))
p
π 1 − (e∗ )2
(e∗ + )p = σv2 (
= Θ(l−3/2 ) + (1 − δ (l) /l)
where
l 2
1
2
(σ Vφ(q) + σa2 − σv2 p
) + Θ(/l)
p v
π 1 − (e∗ )2
1
2
)/(σv2 + σa2 ) + Θ(/l)
= (1 + Θ(l−1/2 ))(σv2 (1 − Θ(l−1/2 )) + σa2 − σv2 p
π 1 − (e∗ )2
δ (l) =
= δ ∗ + O(l−1/2 ),
where δ ∗ := 1− π2 √
∗
σv2
1
2
2 , which is positive by Lemma C.24.
1−(e∗ )2 σv +σa
By taking the δ of Lemma C.11
∗
to be δ + ε or δ − ε respectively for lower and upper bounding the dynamics of (l) , the solution
∗
∗
(l) is Ω(l−δ −ε ) and O(l−δ +ε ) for any ε > 0 since 12 > δ ∗ .
C.6.2
Backward Dynamics
Theorem B.13. Assume φ = tanh in an FRN.
• If σw = 0, χ(m) = χ(l) for all l, m.
• If σw > 0, then for l ≥ m ≥ 0,
√
√
log(χ(m) /χ(l) ) = A( l − m) + B(log l − log m) + O(1)
44
where
r
2 σv2 σw
p
π σv2 + σa2
4
3
σv4
2
B=
− σw
9π σv2 + σa2 σv2 + σa2
4
A=
3
Proof. The σw = 0 case is obvious. We will assume σw > 0 from here on.
As in the proof of Thm B.6,
−1/2
−1
log(χ(m) /χ(l) ) = 2BDσw
b0
√
√
( l − m)
−3/2
−1
− (BDσw
b0
q
2
where B = σv2 σw
, D = 23 π2 ,
−2 −1 −1
b1 2−1 + B 2 D2 σw
b0 2 )(log l − log m) + O(1)
b0 = σv2 + σa2
−2Cσ 2 σ −1
b1 = p v w
σv2 + σa2
b2 =
with C =
q
2
π.
−2
−C 2 σv4 σw
.
2
2
(σv + σa )2
This simplifies to the desired form.
Theorem B.14. Suppose φ = tanh in an FRN.
• If σw = 0, then
(l)
χb = σv2 χ(L) Vφ̇(σb2 )
2 (L)
χ(l)
Vφ̇(σb2 )((σv2 Vφ(σb2 ) + σa2 )(l − 1) + p(0) )
w = σv χ
(L)
χ(l)
Vφ(σb2 )
v =χ
(L)
χ(l)
.
a =χ
• If σw > 0, then for l ≥ m ≥ 0,
√
√
(l)
/χb ) = A( l − m) + Bb (log l − log m) + O(1)
√
√
(l)
log(χ(m)
m) + Bw (log l − log m) + O(1)
w /χw ) = A( l −
√
√
(m)
(l)
log(χa /χa ) = A( l − m) + B(log l − log m) + O(1)
√
√
(l)
log(χ(m)
m) + B(log l − log m) + O(1)
v /χv ) = A( l −
q
σ2 σ
σv4
4
3
2
where A = 43 π2 √ v2 w 2 and B = 9π
−
σ
2
2
2
2
w are as in Thm B.13 and
σ +σ
σ +σ
(m)
log(χb
σv +σa
Bb = B +
1
2
v
a
v
a
and Bw = B − 12 .
Proof. Similar to Thm B.7.
C.7
α-ReLU: Full Residual Network
The following can be checked readily
Lemma B.15. If α > − 12 , then Vψα (q) = cα q α , where cα =
Since ψ̇α = αψα−1 , we have as a corollary,
45
√1 2α−1 Γ
π
α+
1
2
.
0.11
0.10
0.09
0.08
0.07
0.06
0.05
0.04
1
p (l) =l 1 ¡ ®
0.03
1
[¾v2 ¾w2® c® (1 ¡ ®)] 1 ¡ ®
0.02
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
Figure C.14: Verification of leading term of Thm C.28 for α = 0.55.
Lemma C.26. If α > 21 , then Vψ̇α (q) = α2 cα−1 q α−1 .
As a special case, when α = 1, cα = 12 .
The following is a trivial computation, but useful for many simplifications.
Lemma C.27. cα+1 /cα = 2α + 1.
C.7.1
Forward Dynamics
2
Theorem C.28. Suppose we have the nonlinearity φ = ψ1 . Then p(l) = Θ((1 + σv2 σw
/2)l ), with
the hidden constant depending on the initial condition.
Proof. We have
1 2 2
σ (σ p + σb2 ) + σa2 + p
2 v w
1
1
2
+ 1)p + (σv2 σb2 + σa2 ).
= ( σv2 σw
2
2
By the standard method of characteristic equation, we get that
p=
p(l) = A + CB l
where A = −
2
σa
+σb2 σv2
,
2
σv2 σw
B =1+
2
σv2 σw
2 ,
and C is a coefficient determined by initial conditions.
Theorem C.29. Suppose α < 1. We have the following asymptotic expansion
1
p(l) = K1 l 1−α + R(l)
where the remainder term
α
−K2 l 1−α log l
R(l) ∼ (C − K2 )l log l
C(1−α) l
1−2α
1
if α >
if α =
if α <
1
2
1
2
1
2
and K2 6= C
1
α
2α
2α 1−α
where K1 = [σv2 σw
cα (1 − α)] 1−α , K2 = 21 [σv2 cα σw
]
(1 − α) 1−α −1 α and C = σa2 .
Fig. C.14 verifies the leading coefficient and the exponent of the leading term.
Proof. The difference equation governing the evolution of p is
p − p = A(p + B)α + C
2α
2
where A = σv2 cα σw
, B = σb2 /σw
, and C = σa2 . Then Lemma C.15 yields the result.
Thm C.29 combined with Thm C.28 gives the following result.
46
f(c)
f(c)
0
1.0
1
6
0.8
1
0.6
1
3
2
2
0.4
3
5
6
0.2
1
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
c
f(c)
-5
1.00
-6
-7
1
2
2
-8
3
1
0.99
2
2
3
0.98
5
5
-9
6
6
0.97
1
1
-10
c
0.96
-11
c
0.96
0.97
0.98
0.99
1.00
c
0.96
0.97
0.98
0.99
1.00
c
Figure C.15: (a) Jα for different αs and the identity function. From this plot, it looks like Jα (c) ≥ c and
J̇α (c) ≤ 1 for all α ∈ ( 12 , 1] with equality iff c = 1, but this is misleading. (b) shows |Jα (c) − c| in log scale.
Where the curves dip below the x-axis indicate points where Jα (c) = c. We see that in fact every Jα has a
solution Jα (c) = c for a c < 1, when α < 1. (c) Furthermore, at each such c, J̇α < 1.
f(c)
1.0
0.8
1
0.6
c
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
c
Figure C.16: J1 vs identity
Theorem B.16. Suppose we have the nonlinearity φ = ψα . The in an FRN: If α = 1, then
2
p(l) = Θ((1 + σv2 σw
/2)l ), with the hidden constant depending on the initial condition. If 0 < α < 1,
1
1
1
2α
then p(l) = Θ(l 1−α ). More precisely, liml→∞ p/l 1−α = [σv2 σw
cα (1 − α)] 1−α .
By [2], we know that Wψα (q, qc) = Vψα (q)Jα (c), where Jα (c) = Jα (arccos c) and
Z π/2
1
dη cosα η
Jα (θ) :=
(sin θ)2α+1 Γ(α + 1)
.
2πcα
(1 − cos θ cos η)1+α
0
(4)
Note that Jα (c) ∈ (−∞, ∞) for α ∈ (−1, ∞) and any c ∈ (0, 1), even though Vψα is only defined
for α > −1/2.
Fig. C.15 shows a comparison of Jα for different αs along with the identity function. By
[3, Lemma 11], Jα is an increasing and convex function as long as ψα2 is Gaussian-integrable,
which is precisely when α > −1/2. We can compute Jα (1) = Wψα (q, q)/Vψα (q) = 1, and
Γ( α + 1 )2
2
2
Jα (0) = Wψα (q, 0)/Vψα (q) = Vψα/2 (q)2 /Vψα (q) = c2α/2 /cα = 2√1 π Γ(α+
. We record these
1
2)
observations as a lemma.
Lemma C.30. Jα (c) is an increasing and convex function for each α > −1/2 on c ∈ [0, 1].
Jα (1) = 1 and Jα (0) =
α
1 2
1 Γ( 2 + 2 )
√
.
2 π Γ(α+ 21 )
For α = 1, Cho and Saul [2] computed
1 p
J1 (c) = ( 1 − c2 + (π − arccos(c))c).
π
Fig. C.16 shows a plot of J1 vs identity. It has derivative J̇1 (c) = 1 − π1 arccos c, which shows
that J̇1 (c) < 1 with equality iff c = 1, and consequently J1 (c) ≥ c with equality iff c = 1. At the
same time, J̇1 (c) ≥ 0 with equality
iff c = −1, so J1 is increasing on [−1, 1]. It has an asymptotic
√
2 2 3/2
expansion J1 (1 − ε) = 1 − ε + 3π + Θ(5/2 ) at 1.
R∞
The zeroth Bessel function of the second kind is defined by K0 (z) = 1 e−zx (x2 − 1)−1/2 dx. It
is one of the fundamental solutions to the homogeneous differential equation x2 ẏ + xẏ − x2 y = 0.
The following lemma shows that Jα can be expressed in terms of K0 .
R∞
1
Lemma C.31. For any α > −1, Jα (θ) = 2πc
sin2α+1 θ 0 dxK0 (x)ex cos θ xα
α
Proof. Cho and Saul [2] gave the expression
Z ∞
Z
2πcα Jα (θ) = csc θ
du
0
∞
2
dve−(u
0
47
+v 2 −2uv cos θ)/2 sin2 θ α α
u v .
Note that the integrand is symmetric in u and v. Thus, if V = {(u, v) : u, v ≥ 0 & v ≥ u}, then
Z
2
2
2
2πcα Jα (θ) = 2 csc θ du dve−(u +v −2uv cos θ)/2 sin θ uα v α .
V
√
Now make the change of variables from V to {(p, q) : q ≥ 2 p}:
p = uv
q=u+v
dp dq = (v − u) du dv
dp = v du + u dv
dq = du + dv
du dv = (q2 − 4p)−1/2 dp dq
so that we have
Z
2πcα Jα (θ) = 2 csc θ
0
∞
dpep(1+cos θ) csc
2
θ
pα
Z
∞
√
2 p
dqe−q
2
csc2 θ
(q2 − 4p)−1/2 .
The inner integral in q can be expressed in terms of K0 by a change of variable x = q2 /2
Z ∞
2
2
1
dpep(1+cos θ) csc θ pα e−p csc θ K0 (p csc2 θ)
2πcα Jα (θ) = 2 csc θ
2
0
Z ∞
2
= csc θ
dpK0 (p csc2 θ)ep cos θ csc θ pα
0
Z ∞
2α+1
= sin
θ
dxK0 (x)ex cos θ xα
√
p:
0
Define Lα (θ) = 2πcα Jα (θ) csc2α+1 θ =
Lemma C.32. If α > 1, then
R∞
0
dxK0 (x)ex cos θ xα .
Lα (θ) = csc2 θ[(2α − 1) cos θLα−1 (θ) + (α − 1)2 Lα−2 (θ)].
Proof. We will prove this claim for θ < 1, and by continuity this also proves the case θ = 1. As
remarked above, K0 (z) = K̈0 (z) + z −1 K̇0 (z). Thus
Z ∞
Lα (θ) =
dx(K̈0 (x) + x−1 K̇0 (x))ex cos θ xα
0
x cos θ α−1 ∞
= K̇0 ex cos θ xα |∞
x
|0
0 + K0 e
Z
− dx[cos θex cos θ xα + αex cos θ xα−1 ]K̇0
Z
− dx[cos θex cos θ xα−1 + (α − 1)ex cos θ xα−2 ]K0
p π −z
Asymptotically, K0 (z) ∼
as z → ∞ and K0 (z) ∼ − ln(z) as z & 0, and K̇0 (z) ∼
2z e
p π −z
− 2z e as z → ∞ and K̇0 (z) ∼ −z −1 as z & 0. Thus, as α > 1,
p
K̇0 ex cos θ xα |∞
π/2e−x(1−cos θ) xα−1 + lim ex cos θ xα−1 = 0
0 = − lim
x→∞
x&0
p
x cos θ α−1 ∞
−x(1−cos θ) α−2
K0 e
x
|0 = − lim π/2e
x
+ lim ex cos θ xα−1 ln x = 0
x→∞
x&0
So
Z
Lα (θ) = − cos θLα−1 (θ) − (α − 1)Lα−2 (θ) −
dx[cos θex cos θ xα + αex cos θ xα−1 ]K̇0
Via another integration by parts, the integral on the right is
x cos θ α−1
cos θex cos θ xα K0 |∞
x
K0 |∞
0 + αe
0
Z
2
x cos θ α
x cos θ α−1
− dx[cos θe
x + 2α cos θe
x
+ α(α − 1)ex cos θ xα−2 ]K0
= −[cos2 θLα (θ) + 2α cos θLα−1 (θ) + α(α − 1)Lα−2 (θ)]
48
where the evaluation terms vanish just like before. Altogether, we have
Lα (θ) = cos2 θLα (θ) + (2α − 1) cos θLα−1 (θ) + (α − 1)2 Lα−2 (θ)
= csc2 θ[(2α − 1) cos θLα−1 (θ) + (α − 1)2 Lα−2 (θ)]
As a corollary we get
Lemma C.33. Suppose α > 1. Then
Jα (θ) = cos θJα−1 (θ) + (α − 1)2 (2α − 1)−1 (2α − 3)−1 sin2 θJα−2 (θ)
Jα (c) = cJα−1 (c) + (α − 1)2 (2α − 1)−1 (2α − 3)−1 (1 − c2 )Jα−2 (c)
The derivative of Jα (θ) turns out to be quite simple.
Lemma C.34. Suppose α > 0. Then
J˙α (θ) = −α2 (2α − 1)−1 Jα−1 (θ) sin θ
J̇α (c) = α2 (2α − 1)−1 Jα−1 (c)
Proof. We will prove the first formula. The second follows from chain rule. By Lemma C.31,
Z
1
sin2α+1 θ dxK0 (x)ex cos θ xα
Jα (θ) =
2πcα
Z
1
2α
˙
Jα (θ) =
[(2α + 1) sin θ cos θ dxK0 (x)ex cos θ xα
2πcα
Z
− sin2α+2 θ dxK0 (x)ex cos θ xα+1 ]
cα+1
csc θJα+1 (θ)
cα
= (2α + 1) csc θ[cos θJα (θ) − Jα+1 (θ)].
= (2α + 1) cot θJα (θ) −
As α + 1 > 1, by Lemma C.33, this is
− (2α + 1) csc θ[(α − 1)2 (2α + 1)−1 (2α − 1)−1 sin2 θJα−1 (θ)]
= −(α − 1)2 (2α − 1)−1 sin θJα−1 (θ).
Thus J̇α (1) = α2 (2α − 1)−1 Jα−1 (1) = α2 (2α − 1)−1 for any α > 0 by Lemma C.30. For
1/2 < α ≤ 1, J̇α (1) ≥ 1 with equality iff α = 1, and for α = 1/2, J̇α (1) = ∞ > 1 by continuity
of J̇α (c) in α. Because for α > −1/2, Jα is increasing and convex on [0, 1] and Jα (0) > 0 by
Lemma C.30, Jα intersects identity at a unique point away from 1 when α ∈ [1/2, 1). We record this
as a theorem.
Theorem C.35. For α ∈ [1/2, 1), Jα (c) = c has two solutions: an unstable solution at 1 (”unstable”
meaning J̇α (1) > 1) and a stable solution in e∗ ∈ (0, 1) (”stable” meaning J̇α (e∗ ) < 1).
This result confirms that pictures presented in Fig. C.17b,c are qualitatively correct, that there are
indeed stable fixed points of Jα away from 1.
2 −1
Theorem B.17. Suppose φ = ψ1 . Then in an FRN, e(l) → 1 and 1 − e(l) ∼ [ 14 σv2 σw
B U l]−2 for
√
2
B = 1+σv2 σw
/2 and U = 23π2 . As a result, s(l) = (1−e(l) )p(l) = Θ(l−2 exp(Θ(l))) = exp(Θ(l)).
Proof. If e < 1, then
c=
2
σw
γ + σb2
≥e
2 p + σ2
σw
b
J1 (c) ≥ J1 (e)
σ 2 cα qα J1 (c) + σb2
e= v 2
≥ J1 (e)
σv cα qα + σb2
49
f(c)
0
1.0
1
6
0.8
1
0.6
1
3
2
2
0.4
3
5
6
0.2
1
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
f(c)
f(c)
-5
1.00
-6
1
-7
3
2
2
3
0.98
5
5
-9
6
6
0.97
1
1
-10
c
0.96
-11
c
c
1
0.99
2
2
-8
0.96
0.97
0.98
0.99
1.00
c
0.96
0.97
0.98
0.99
1.00
c
Figure C.17: Left-to-right: (a) Jα for different αs and the identity function (black, dashed line). J1 is highlighted
in red. From this plot, it looks like Jα (c) ≥ c and J̇α (c) ≤ 1 for all α ∈ ( 12 , 1] with equality iff c = 1, but
this is misleading. (b) shows |Jα (c) − c| in log scale. Where the curves dip below the x-axis indicate points
where Jα (c) = c. We see that in fact every Jα has a solution Jα (c) = c for a c < 1, when α < 1. (c)
Furthermore, at each such c, J̇α < 1. (b) and (c) demonstrate the existence of stable fixed points away from 1
for Jα , α ∈ (1/2, 1), which is confirmed rigorously by Thm C.35.
but e ≥ J1 (e) > e as noted above. Thus by monotone convergence e converges, and e∗ = 1 is the
only possible fixed point.
By Lemma C.1, c = e(1 + Θ(p−1 )) = 1 − + Θ(p−1 ) = 1 − u where u := 1 − Θ(p−1 ). Using
the asymptotic expansion J1 (1 − ) = 1 − + U 3/2 + Θ(5/2 ), we have
q
(1 − )p = σv2 J1 (1 − u) + σa2 + (1 − )p
2
q
−p = σv2 (J1 (1 − u) − 1) − p
2
2q
= σv [−u + U u3/2 3/2 + Θ(u5/2 5/2 )] − p
2
1
q
= [p + σv2 (u − U u3/2 1/2 + Θ(u5/2 3/2 ))]
p
2
1
q
2
= [p − σa + σv2 (Θ(p−1 ) − U u3/2 1/2 + Θ(u5/2 3/2 ))]
p
2
2
2q
−σa + σv 2 (Θ(p−1 ) − U u3/2 1/2 + Θ(u5/2 3/2 ))
]
= [1 +
p
−σa2 q−1 + 21 σv2 (Θ(p−1 ) − U u3/2 1/2 + Θ(u5/2 3/2 ))
= [1 +
]
pq−1
2
Let the content of the bracket on the RHS be ℵ. We have pq−1 = (1 + o(1))B/σw
. If = O(p−1 ),
−1
then ℵ = 1 − O(p ), but because p is exponentially decreasing, this means = Θ(1) and does not
converge to 0 — this is a contradiction. Therefore, = ω(p−1 ), and
1
2
U 1/2 (1 + o(1))]
= [1 − B −1 σv2 σw
2
1
2
− = − B −1 σv2 σw
U 3/2 (1 + o(1))
2
2 −1
Using Lemma C.14 to upper and lower bound our dynamics, we get that (l) ∼ [ 14 σv2 σw
B U l]−2 .
Lemma C.36. Let φ be any nonlinearity. Suppose Wφ(r, rd) = Vφ(r)K(d) for some twice differentiable function K(d) independent of q, where K(1) = 1 naturally. Suppose further that
• K(d) = d has a solution d = e∗ > 0 where K̇(e∗ ) = δ < 1;
• K(d) > d for all d < e∗ and K(d) < d for all 1 > d > e∗ ; and
• K is nondecreasing.
Let (l) := e(l) − e∗ and suppose e(0) < 1. If γ (l) → ∞ and Vφ(q(l) ) → ∞, then (l) → 0 and
satisfies
σ 2 + (1 − δ + O())σv2 Vφ(q)
= 1− a
+ Vφ(q)Θ(γ −1 p−1 ).
p
50
Proof. First we note that because e∗ is the only stable fixed point of the dynamics x 7→ K(x), with the
basin of attraction [0, 1), we can show e(l) → e∗ as in the proof of Thm B.11 (using Lemma C.23).
Write V (l) := Vφ(q(l) ). We first show that e(l) → e∗ . When l is large,
c=
e=
2
σw
γ + σb2
= e(1 + O(γ −1 ))
2
σw p + σb2
σv2 V K(c) + σa2
= K(c)(1 + O(V −1 K(c)−1 )).
σv2 V + σa2
If γ (l) is bounded for all l, then e → 0 because p(l) → ∞. Since K(c) > 0 for c ∈ [0, 1]
and V (l) → ∞, we have that in the limit l → ∞, liml→∞ e = 0 = K(liml→∞ e) = K(0) (by
the continuity of K), which is impossible by our assumptions. Thus γ (l) → ∞, and we have
liml→∞ e = K(liml→∞ e). By our assumptions, e∗ is the only stable fixed point of K with basin of
attraction [0, 1), so this shows that e → e∗ as desired.
Now we derive the equation in question. Note that c = e(1 + Θ(γ −1 )) because e∗ < 1. We use the
Taylor expansion K(e∗ + ) = e∗ + δ + O(2 ).
(e∗ + )p = σv2 V K (e∗ + )(1 + Θ(γ −1 )) + σa2 + (e∗ + )p
= σv2 V (e∗ + δ( + Θ(γ −1 )) + O(2 )) + σa2 + (e∗ + )p
p = σv2 V (δ( + Θ(γ −1 )) + O(2 )) + p
= (1 −
σa2 + (1 − δ + O())σv2 V
) + Θ(V γ −1 p−1 )
p
Theorem B.18. Suppose φ = ψα for 0 < α < 1 in an FRN. Then e converges to the unique nonunit
fixed point e∗ of Jα , and |e∗ − e(l) | is Θ̌(l−µ ), where µ = (1 − J̇α (e∗ ))/(1 − α). Additionally,
s(l) = Θ(p(l) ) = Θ(l1/(1−α) ).
Proof. We apply Lemma C.36. We first check the conditions of the lemma, with K = Jα . The
following conditions were already verified.
• Jα has a fixed point e∗ less than but very close to 1, where its slope is υ := J̇α (e∗ ) < 1.
(Thm C.35)
• Jα (d) > d for all d < e∗ and Jα (d) < d for all d > e∗ . (By the convexity shown in
Lemma C.30)
• Jα is nondecreasing (Lemma C.30). Furthermore, from its integral formula (Eq. (4)), we
see easily that Jα is smooth at e∗ < 1.
We also proved the following
1
1
2α
• p(l) ∼ [σv2 σw
cα (1 − α)] 1−α l 1−α (Thm C.29) and γ (l) is asymptotically a constant fraction
(l)
of p (Lemma C.36), so both go to ∞.
2
• Vψα (q) = cα qα = cα (σw
p + σb2 )α = Θ(lα/(1−α) ), so goes to ∞. (Lemma B.15)
Thus, for υ = J̇(e∗ ),
2α
σa2 + (1 − υ + O())σv2 Vφ(q)
(1 − υ)σv2 σw
cα
∼
1−α
p
p
= l−1 (1 − υ)/(1 − α).
51
1
Now, Vφ(q)γ −1 p−1 = Θ(l− 1−α −1 ). By using the dynamics of Lemma C.11 to upper and lower
bound our dynamics, we have (l) = Ω(l−µ− ), O(l−µ+ ) for any > 0, where µ = min((1 −
υ)/(1 − α), 1/(1 − α)) = (1 − υ)/(1 − α).
C.7.2
Backward Dynamics
Lemma C.37. Suppose random variable X ∼ N (0, σ 2 ), and Y = ψ−β (X) for some β > 0, where
ψα is α-ReLU. Then for ξ > 0, Y has density
Pr[Y ∈ [ξ, ξ + dξ]] =
β
√
1
1
2πσ 2
ξ − β −1 e−ξ
−2/β
/2σ 2
.
At ξ = 0, Y has density given by a Dirac delta of mass 21 .
Furthermore, Y has finite second moment iff β < 12 .
Proof. We have
Pr[Y ∈ [ξ, ∞)] = Pr[X ∈ [0, ξ −1/β ]]
Z ξ−1/β
2
2
1
=√
e−x /2σ dx.
2
2πσ 0
Differentiating the RHS against ξ using Leibniz’s rule, we get
d Pr[Y ∈ [ξ, ∞)]/dξ = √
=
1
2πσ 2
e−ξ
−2/β
/2σ 2
d −1/β
ξ
dξ
−2/β
1
−1
/2σ 2
√
ξ − β −1 e−ξ
.
2
β 2πσ
Negating both sides gives the density fY of Y for ξ > 0. For ξ = 0, observe that limξ→0 fY (ξ) = 0
1
−2/β
/2σ 2
because, while ξ − β −1 blows up polynomially, e−ξ
blows up exponentially. Thus the
contribution of Y ’s mass at Y = 0 from X > 0 is 0. On the other hand, all X < 0 gets mapped to
Y = 0, so fY (0) = 12 δ0 , where δ0 is the Dirac delta.
For the second assertion, observe that
fY (ξ) ∼
Thus, ξ 2 fY (ξ) is integrable iff 2 −
1
β
√
1
1
β 2πσ 2
ξ − β −1 as ξ → ∞.
− 1 < −1 ⇐⇒ β < 21 .
Theorem B.19. Suppose we have the nonlinearity ψα in an FRN. Var(ψ̇α (ζ)2 ) diverges for any
Gaussian variable ζ with mean 0 if α ≤ 34 but is finite if α > 43 .
Proof. Note that ψ̇α ∝ ψα−1 , so it suffices to show that Var(ψα−1 (ζ)2 ) = Var(ψ2α−2 (ζ)) is
infinite for ζ ∼ N (0, σ 2 ). By Lemma C.37 with β = 2 − 2α, ψ2α−2 (ζ) has finite variance iff
β < 12 ⇐⇒ α > 34 .
Theorem B.20. Suppose we have the nonlinearity ψα in an FRN. If α = 1, then χ(l−m) =
m
α2
2
χ(l) 12 σv2 σw
,
+ 1 . If α ∈ ( 43 , 1), then χ(l−m) = Θ(1)χ(l) (l/(l − m))R for R = (1−α)(2α−1)
where the constants in Θ(1) do not depend on l or m.
Proof. If α = 1, then
So χ(l−m) /χ(l) = Θ(1)B m
1
2
χ = χ(1 + σv2 σw
).
2
2
for B = 1 + 12 σv2 σw
.
52
If
1
2
< α < 1, then χ/χ − 1 is
2
σv2 σw
Vφ̇(q)
2 2
= σv2 σw
α cα−1 qα−1
2 2
2
= σv2 σw
α cα−1 (σw
p)α−1 + Θ(pα−2 )
α
1
α−2
α
2α 2
= σv2 σw
α cα−1 (K1 l 1−α − K2 l 1−α log l + o(l 1−α log l))α−1 + Θ(l 1−α )
=
=
2α 2
σv2 σw
α cα−1 [K1α−1 l−1 + Θ(l−2 log l)]
2α 2
σv2 σw
α cα−1 K1α−1 l−1 + Θ(l−2 log l)
−1
−2
= Rl
+ Θ(l
+ O(l
−3
by Thm C.29
)
log l)
2α 2
where R = σv2 σw
α cα−1 K1α−1 =
α2
(1−α)(2α−1)
1
2α
and K1 = [σv2 σw
cα (1 − α)] 1−α . So
χ = χ exp(Rl−1 + Θ(l−2 log l))
R
l
(l−m)
(l)
χ
= Θ(1)χ
l−m
as desired.
Theorem B.21. If φ = ψ1 in an FRN, then for l ≥ m ≥ 0,
(l−m)
χb
= Θ(1)χ(l) B m ,
χ(l−m)
= Θ(1)χ(l) B l ,
w
χ(l−m)
= Θ(1)χ(l) B l ,
v
χ(l−m)
= Θ(1)χ(l) B m .
a
2
/2.
where B = 1 + σv2 σw
If φ = ψα in an FRN, for α < 1, then for l ≥ m ≥ 0,
(l−m)
χb
α
χ(l−m)
= Θ(1)χ(l) lR (l − m) 1−α −R ,
w
= Θ(1)χ(l) lR (l − m)−R−1 ,
α
χ(l−m)
= Θ(1)χ(l) lR (l − m) 1−α −R ,
v
χ(l−m)
= Θ(1)χ(l) (l/(l − m))R .
a
Proof. The proof is similar to that of Thm B.7.
53
| 9cs.NE
|
On the Geodesic Centers of Polygonal Domains⋆
Haitao Wang
arXiv:1607.05824v1 [cs.CG] 20 Jul 2016
Department of Computer Science
Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA
[email protected]
Abstract. In this paper, we study the problem of computing Euclidean geodesic centers of a polygonal
domain P with a total of n vertices. We discover many interesting observations. We give a necessary
condition for a point being a geodesic center. We show that there is at most one geodesic center among all
points of P that have topologically-equivalent shortest path maps. This implies that the total number of
geodesic centers is bounded by the combinatorial size of the shortest path map equivalence decomposition
of P, which is known to be O(n10 ). One key observation is a π-range property on shortest path lengths
when points are moving. With these observations, we propose an algorithm that computes all geodesic
centers in O(n11 log n) time. Previously, an algorithm of O(n12+ǫ ) time was known for this problem, for
any ǫ > 0.
1
Introduction
Let P be a polygonal domain with a total of h holes and n vertices, i.e., P is a multiply-connected
region whose boundary is a union of n line segments, forming h + 1 closed polygonal cycles. A simple
polygon is a special case of a polygonal domain with h = 0. For any two points s and t, a shortest path
or geodesic path from s to t is a path in P whose Euclidean length is minimum among all paths from
s to t in P; we let d(s, t) denote the Euclidean length of any shortest path from s to t and we also say
that d(s, t) is the shortest path distance or geodesic distance from s to t.
A point s is a geodesic center of P if s minimizes the value maxt∈P d(s, t), i.e., the maximum
geodesic distance from s to all points of P. In this paper, we study the problem of computing the
geodesic centers of P.
The problem in simple polygons has been well studied. It is known that for any point in a simple
polygon, its farthest point must be a vertex of the polygon [20]. It has been shown that the geodesic
center in a simple polygon is unique and has at least two farthest points [18]. Due to these helpful
observations, efficient algorithms for finding geodesic centers in simple polygons have been developed.
Asano and Toussaint [2] first gave an O(n4 log n) time algorithm for the problem, and later Pollack,
Sharir, and Rote [18] solved the problem in O(n log n) time. It had been an open problem whether the
problem is solvable in linear time until recently Ahn et al. [1] presented a linear-time algorithm for it.
Finding a geodesic center in a polygonal domain P is much more difficult. This is partially due to
that a farthest point of a point in P may be in the interior of P [3]. Also, it is easy to construct an
example where the geodesic center of P is not unique (e.g., see Fig. 1). Bae, Korman, and Okamoto
[4] gave the first-known algorithm that can compute a geodesic center in O(n12+ǫ ) time for any ǫ > 0.
They first showed that for any point its farthest points must be vertices of its shortest path map
in P. Then, they considered the shortest path map equivalence decomposition (or SPM-equivalence
decomposition) [7], denoted by Dspm ; for each cell of Dspm , they computed the upper envelope of O(n)
graphs in three-dimensional space, which takes O(n2+ǫ ) time [10], to search a geodesic center in the
cell. Since the size of Dspm is O(n10 ) [7], their algorithm runs in O(n12+ǫ ) time.
A concept closely related to the geodesic center is the geodesic diameter, which is the maximum
geodesic distance over all pairs of points in P, i.e., maxs,t,∈P d(s, t). In simple polygons, due to the
property that there always exists a pair of vertices of P whose geodesic distance is equal to the geodesic
⋆
An extended-abstract of this paper will appear in the Proceedings of the 24th Annual European Symposium on
Algorithms (ESA 2016).
v3
b2
u2
a2
P
Fig. 1. The boundary of P consists of an outer and an inner equilateral triangles with their geometric centers co-located. Each of
the three thick points is a geodesic
center of P.
t
b3
v1
b1
a1
s
v2
u1
a3
u3
Fig. 2. Illustrating the π-range property. Suppose there are three shortest s-t paths
through vertices ui and vi with i = 1, 2, 3, respectively. If s and t move along the
blue arrows simultaneously (possibly with different “speeds”), then all three shortest
paths strictly decreases (it is difficult to tell whether this is true from the figure,
so these two blue directions here are only for illustration purpose). The special case
happens when the six angles ai and bi for i = 1, 2, 3 satisfy ai = bi for i = 1, 2, 3.
diameter, efficient algorithms have been given for computing the geodesic diameters. Chazelle [6] gave
the first algorithm that runs in O(n2 ) time. Later, Suri [20] presented an O(n log n)-time algorithm.
Finally, the problem was solved in O(n) time by Hershberger and Suri [11]. Computing the geodesic
diameter in a polygonal domain P is much more difficult. It was shown in [3] that the geodesic diameter
can be realized by two points in the interior of P, in which case there are at least five distinct shortest
paths between the two points. As for the geodesic center problem, this makes it difficult to discretize
the search space. By an exhaustive-search method, Bae, Korman, and Okamoto [3] gave the first-known
algorithm for computing the diameter of P and the algorithm runs in O(n7.73 ) or O(n7 (log n + h))
time.
Refer to [5,8,13,15,16,17,19] for other variations of geodesic diameter and center problems (e.g.,
the L1 metric and the link distance case).
1.1
Our Contributions
We conduct a “comprehensive” study on geodesic centers of P. We discover many interesting observations, and some of them are even surprising. For example, we show that even if a geodesic center
is in the interior of P, it may have only one farthest point, which is somewhat counter-intuitive. We
give a necessary condition for a point being a geodesic center. We also show that there is at most one
geodesic center among all points of P that have topologically-equivalent shortest path maps in P. This
immediately implies that the interior of each cell or each edge of the SPM-equivalence decomposition
Dspm can contain at most one geodesic center, and thus, the total number of geodesic centers of P
is bounded by the combinatorial size of Dspm , which is known to be O(n10 ) [7]. Previously, the only
known upper bound on the total number of geodesic centers of P is O(n12+ǫ ), which is implied by the
algorithm in [4].
These observations are all more or less due to an interesting observation, which we call the π-range
property and is one key contribution of this paper. Here we demonstrate an application of the π-range
property (see the paper for the details). Let s and t be two points in the interior of P such that t is a
farthest point of s in P. Refer to Fig. 2 for an example. Suppose there are three shortest paths from
s to t as shown in Fig. 2. The π-range property says that unless a special case happens, there exists
an open range of exactly size π (e.g., delimited by the right open half-plane bounded by the vertical
line through s in Fig. 2) such that if s moves along any direction in the range for an infinitesimal
distance, we can always find a direction to move t such that the lengths of all three shortest paths
strictly decrease. Further, if the special case does not happen, we can explicitly determine the above
2
t2
t3
s
t1
Fig. 3. Illustrating a geodesic center s with three farthest points t1 , t2 , t3 such that all these four points are in the interior
of P. There are three shortest paths from s to each of t1 , t2 , t3 .
range of size π. In fact, it is the special case that makes it possible for a geodesic center having only
one farthest point.
With these observations, we propose an exhaustive-search algorithm to compute a set S of candidate
points such that all geodesic centers must be in S. For example, refer to Fig. 3 for a schematic diagram,
where a geodesic center s has three farthest points t1 , t2 , t3 and all these four points are in the interior
of P. The nine shortest paths from s to t1 , t2 , t3 provide a system of eight equations, which give eight
(independent) constraints that can determine the four points s, t1 , t2 , t3 if we consider the coordinates
of these points as eight variables. This suggests our exhaustive-search approach to compute candidate
points for such a geodesic center s (similar exhaustive-search approaches are also used before, e.g.,
[3,7]). However, if a geodesic center s has only one farthest point (e.g., Fig. 2), then we have only
three shortest paths, which give only two constraints. In order to determine s and t, which have four
variables, we need two more constraints. It turns out the π-range property (i.e., the special case)
provides exactly two more constraints (on the angles as shown in Fig. 2). In this way, we can still
compute candidate points for such s. Also, if a geodesic center has two farthest points, we will need
one more constraint, which is also provided by the π-range property (the non-special case). Note that
the previous exhaustive-search approaches [3,7] do not need the π-range property.
The number of candidate points in S is O(n11 ). To find all geodesic centers from S, a straightforward
solution is to compute the shortest path map for every point of S, which takes O(n12 log n) time in
total. Again, with the help of the π-range property, we propose a pruning algorithm to eliminate most
points from S in O(n11 log n) time such that none of the eliminated points is a geodesic center and the
number of the remaining points of S is only O(n10 ). Consequently, we can find all geodesic centers in
additional O(n11 log n) time by computing their shortest path maps.
Although we improve the previous O(n12+ǫ ) time algorithm in [4] by a factor of roughly n1+ǫ ,
the running time is still huge. We feel that our observations (in particular, the π-range property)
may be more interesting than the algorithm itself. We suspect that these observations may also find
applications in other related problems. The paper is lengthy and some discussions are quite tedious,
which is mainly due to a considerable number of cases depending on whether a geodesic center and its
farthest points are in the interior, on an edge, or at vertices of P, although the essential idea is quite
similar for all these cases.
The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we introduce notation and review
some concepts. In Section 3, we give our observations. In particular, we prove the π-range property
in Section 4. Our algorithm for computing the candidate points is presented in Section 5. Finally, we
find all geodesic centers from the candidate points in Section 6.
3
2
Preliminaries
Consider any point s ∈ P. Let dmax (s) denote the maximum geodesic distance from s to all points of
P, i.e., dmax (s) = maxt∈P d(s, t). A point t ∈ P is a farthest point of s if d(s, t) = dmax (s). We use
F (s) to denote the set of all farthest points of s in P. For any two points p and q in P, for convenience
of discussions, we say that p is visible to q if the line segment pq is in P and the interior of pq does
not contain any vertex of P. We use |pq| to denote the (Euclidean) length of any line segment pq.
Note that two points s and t in P may have more than one shortest path between them, and if not
specified, we use π(s, t) to denote any such shortest path.
For simplicity of discussion, we make a general position assumption that any two vertices of P
have only one shortest path and no three vertices of P are on the same line.
Denote by I the set of all interior points of P, V the set of all vertices of P, and E the set of all
relatively interior points on the edges of P (i.e., E is the boundary of P minus V).
Shortest path maps. Given a point s ∈ P, a shortest path map of s [7], denoted by SPM (s), is a
decomposition of P into regions (or cells) such that in each cell σ, the combinatorial structures of
shortest paths from s to all points t in σ are the same, and more specifically, the sequence of obstacle
vertices along π(s, t) is fixed for all t in σ. Further, the root of σ, denoted by r(σ), is the last vertex
of V ∪ {s} in the path π(s, t) for any point t ∈ σ (hence π(s, t) = π(s, r(σ)) ∪ r(σ)t; note that r(σ)
is s if s is visible to t). As in [7], we classify each edge of σ into three types: a portion of an edge
of P, an extension segment, which is a line segment extended from r(σ) along the opposite direction
from r(σ) to the vertex of π(s, t) preceding r(σ), and a bisector curve/edge that is a hyperbolic arc.
For each point t in a bisector edge of SPM (s), t is on the common boundary of two cells and there
are two shortest paths from s to t through the roots of the two cells, respectively (and neither path
contains both roots). The vertices of SPM (s) include V ∪ {s} and all intersections of edges of SPM (s).
If a vertex t of SPM (s) is an intersection of two or more bisector edges, then there are more than two
shortest paths from s to t. The map SPM (s) has O(n) vertices, edges, and cells, and can be computed
in O(n log n) time [12]. It was shown [4] that any farthest point of s in P must be a vertex of SPM (s).
For differentiation, we will refer to the vertices of V as polygon vertices and refer to the edges of E
as polygon edges.
The SPM-equivalence decomposition Dspm of P [7] is a subdivision of P into regions such that for
all points s in the interior of the same region or edge of Dspm , the shortest path maps SPM (s) are
topologically equivalent. Chiang and Mitchell [7] showed that the combinatorial complexity of Dspm
is bounded by O(n10 ) and Dspm can be computed in O(n11 ) time.
Directions and ranges. In this paper, we will have intensive discussions on moving points along certain
directions. For any direction r, we represent r by the angle α(r) ∈ [0, 2π) counterclockwise from the
positive direction of the x-axis. For convenience, whenever we are talking about an angle α, unless
otherwise specified, depending on the context we may refer to any angle α + 2π · k for k ∈ Z. For any
two angles α1 and α2 with α1 ≤ α2 < α1 + 2π, the interval [α1 , α2 ] represents a direction range that
includes all directions whose angles are in [α1 , α2 ], and α2 − α1 is called the size of the range. Note
that the range can be open (e.g., (α1 , α2 )) and the size of any direction range is no more than 2π.
Consider a half-plane h whose bounding line is through a point s in the plane. We say h delimits a
range of size π of directions for s that consists of all directions along which s will move towards inside
h. If h is an open half-plane, then the range is open as well.
A direction r for s ∈ P is called a free direction of s if we move s along r for an infinitesimal
distance then s is still in P. We use Rf (s) to denote the range of all free directions of s. Clearly, if
s ∈ I, Rf (s) contains all directions; if s ∈ E, Rf (s) is a (closed) range of size π; if s ∈ V , Rf (s) is
delimited by the two incident polygon edges of s.
4
3
Observations
Consider any point s ∈ P and let t be any farthest point of s. Recall that t is a vertex of SPM (s) [4].
Suppose we move s infinitesimally along a free direction r to a new point s′ . Since |ss′ | is infinitesimal,
we can assume that s and s′ are in the same cell σ of Dspm . Further, if s is in the interior of σ, then
s′ is also in the interior of σ.
Regardless of whether s is in the interior of σ or not, there is a vertex t′ ∈ SPM (s′ ) corresponding
to the vertex t of SPM (s) in the following sense [7]: If the line segment s′ t′ is a shortest path from
s′ to t′ , then st is a shortest path from s to t; otherwise, if s′ , u1 , u2 , . . . , uk , t′ is the sequence of the
vertices of V ∪ {s′ , t′ } in a shortest path from s′ to t′ , then s, u1 , u2 , . . . , uk , t is also the sequence of
the vertices of V ∪ {s, t} in a shortest path from s to t.
In the case that s is on the boundary of σ while s′ is in the interior of σ, there might be more than
one such vertex t′ ∈ Dspm corresponding to t (refer to [7] for the details) and we use Mt (s′ ) to denote
the set of all such vertices t′ . We should point out that although a vertex in SPM (s) may correspond
to more than one vertex in SPM (s′ ), any vertex in SPM (s′ ) can correspond to one and only one vertex
in SPM (s) (because s′ is always in the interior of σ).
We introduce the following definition which is crucial to the paper.
Definition 1. A free direction r is called an admissible direction of s with respect to t if as we move
s infinitesimally along r to a new point s′ , d(s′ , t′ ) < d(s, t) holds for each t′ ∈ Mt (s′ ).
For T
any t ∈ F (s), let R(s, t) denote the set of all admissible directions of s with respect to t; let
R(s) = t∈F (s) R(s, t). The following Lemma 1, which gives a necessary condition for a point being a
geodesic center of P, explains why we consider admissible directions.
Before proving Lemma 1, we introduce some notation and Observation 1.
Consider any two points s and t in P. Suppose the vertices of V ∪ {s, t} along a shortest s-t path
π(s, t) are s = u0 , u1 , . . . , uk = t. According to our definition on the “visibility”, s is visible to t if and
only if k = 1. If s is not visible to t, then k 6= 1 and we call u1 an s-pivot and uk−1 a t-pivot of π(s, t).
It is possible that there are multiple shortest paths between s and t, and thus there might be multiple
s-pivots and t-pivots for (s, t). We use Us (t) and Ut (s) to denote the sets of all s-pivots and t-pivots
for (s, t), respectively. Note that according to our above definition, for any u ∈ Us (t), the line segment
su does not contain any polygon vertex in its interior.
We have the following observation. Similar results have been given in [3].
Observation 1 Suppose t is a farthest point of a point s.
1. If t is in I, then |Ut (s)| ≥ 3 and t must be in the interior of the convex hull of the vertices of Ut (s).
2. If t is in E, say, t ∈ e for a polygon edge e of E, then |Ut (s)| ≥ 2 and Ut (s) has at least one vertex
in the open half-plane bounded by the supporting line of e and containing the interior of P in the
small neighborhood of e. Further, Ut (s) has at least one vertex in each of the two open half-planes
bounded by the line through t and perpendicular to e.
Proof: The proof is similar to those in [3]. The main idea is that if the conditions are not satisfied,
then we can always find a point t′ further to s than t, incurring contradiction.
Lemma 1. If s is a geodesic center of P, then R(s) = ∅.
Proof: Assume to the contrary that R(s) 6= ∅. Let r be any direction in R(s). Then, r is in R(s, t) for
each t ∈ F (s). In other words, r is an admissible direction of s with respect to each t ∈ F (s). Suppose
we move s infinitesimally along r to a new point s′ . In the following, we show that dmax (s′ ) < dmax (s),
which contradicts with that s is a geodesic center.
5
t∗
t′
e
s
γs
γt
rs
rt
t
u
u
l t′
v
Fig. 4. Illustrating the proof of Lemma 1 for the case t′ ∈ E: Fig. 5. Illustrating the definitions of the angles γs and γt .
|ut′ | < |ut∗ |.
Consider any t′ ∈ F (s′ ), i.e., t′ is a farthest point of s′ . To prove dmax (s′ ) < dmax (s), it is sufficient
to show that d(s′ , t′ ) < dmax (s).
If t′ is in Mt (s′ ) for any t ∈ F (s), then since r is an admissible direction of s with respect to t, it
holds that d(s′ , t′ ) < d(s, t) = dmax (s). In the following, we assume t′ is not in Mt (s′ ) for any t ∈ F (s).
Let V (s) be the set of all vertices of SPM (s) that are not in F (s). Let δ = dmax (s)−maxt∈V (s) d(s, t).
Note that since |V (s)| is finite, the value δ is well-defined. Also note that the value δ is fixed and does
not depend on s′ . Since s moves infinitesimally to s′ , we can assume |ss′ | < δ.
Since t′ is a farthest point of s′ , t′ must be a vertex of SPM (s′ ). Let t∗ be the vertex of SPM (s)
corresponding to t′ . Note that although a vertex of SPM (s) may correspond to multiple vertices of
SPM (s′ ), a vertex of SPM (s′ ) corresponds to one and only one vertex of SPM (s). Hence, the vertex
t∗ is unique, and further, Ut′ (s′ ) ⊆ Ut∗ (s). Since t′ is not in Mt (s′ ) for any t ∈ F (s), we know that t∗
is not in F (s) but in V (s). Therefore, d(s, t∗ ) ≤ maxt∈V (s) d(s, t) = dmax (s) − δ.
Since ss′ ∈ P, it holds that d(s′ , t′ ) ≤ |s′ s| + d(s, t′ ). Therefore, if we can prove d(s, t′ ) ≤ d(s, t∗ ),
since |ss′ | < δ and d(s, t∗ ) ≤ dmax (s) − δ, we can obtain d(s′ , t′ ) ≤ |s′ s| + d(s, t′ ) < δ + dmax (s) − δ =
dmax (s). In the sequel, we prove d(s, t′ ) ≤ d(s, t∗ ).
If t′ ∈ V, then t∗ must be t′ [7]. Hence, d(s, t′ ) = d(s, t∗ ) and thus d(s, t′ ) ≤ d(s, t∗ ) trivially follows.
In the following, we assume t′ 6∈ V. Thus, t′ is either in E or I.
Recall that Ut′ (s′ ) ⊆ Ut∗ (s). To prove d(s, t′ ) ≤ d(s, t∗ ), it is sufficient to find a vertex u ∈ Ut′ (s′ )
such that |ut′ | ≤ |ut∗ | because d(s, t′ ) = d(s, u) + |ut′ | and d(s, t∗ ) = d(s, u) + |ut∗ |. To this end, we
will make use of Observation 1.
1. If t′ ∈ E, let e be the polygon edge of E that contains t′ . Since t′ is a farthest point of s′ , by
Observation 1, there must be a vertex of Ut′ (s′ ) on either open half-plane bounded by lt′ , where
lt′ is the line through t′ and perpendicular to e. Since t′ ∈ E, t∗ is either on e or an endpoint of e
[7]. In either case, one open half-plane bounded by lt′ contains t∗ and the other does not (e.g., see
Fig. 4). Let u be the vertex of Ut′ (s′ ) in the open half-plane bounded by lt′ that does not contain
t∗ . Clearly, |ut′ | ≤ |ut∗ | holds.
2. If t′ ∈ I, then since t′ is a farthest point of s′ , by Observation 1, t′ must be in the interior of the
convex hull of all vertices of Ut′ (s′ ). Then, regardless of whatever position of t∗ is, there must be
a vertex u ∈ Ut′ (s′ ) on the convex hull such that |ut′ | ≤ |ut∗ | holds.
The lemma is thus proved.
As explained in Section 1, we will compute candidate points for geodesic centers. As a necessary
condition, Lemma 1 will be helpful for computing those candidate points.
Consider any point s ∈ P. Let t be a farthest point of s. We need to find a way to determine the
admissible range R(s, t). To this end, we will give a sufficient condition for a direction being in R(s, t).
We first assume that s is not visible to t, and as will be seen later, the other case is trivial.
Let u and v respectively be the s-pivot and the t-pivot of (s, t) in a shortest s-t path π(s, t).
Clearly, d(s, t) = |su| + d(u, v) + |vt|. We define du,v (s, t) = |su| + d(u, v) + |vt| as a function of s ∈ R2
and t ∈ R2 . Suppose we move s along a free direction rs with the unit speed and move t along a
free direction rt with a speed τ ≥ 0. Let γs denote the smaller angle between the following two rays
originated from s (e.g., see Fig. 5): one with direction rs and one with direction from u to s. Similarly,
6
let γt denote the smaller angle between the following two rays originated from t: one with direction rt
and one with direction from v to t. In fact, as discussed in [3], if we consider d(s, t) as a four-variate
function, the triple (rs , rt , τ ) corresponds to a vector ρ in R4 , and the directional derivative of du,v (s, t)
at (s, t) ∈ R4 along ρ, denoted by d′u,v (s, t), and the second directional derivative of du,v (s, t) at (s, t)
along ρ, denoted by d′′u,v (s, t), are
d′u,v (s, t) = cos γs + τ cos γt ,
d′′u,v (s, t) =
sin2 γt
sin2 γs
+τ ·
.
|su|
|tv|
(1)
Since τ ≥ 0, d′′u,v (s, t) ≥ 0 always holds. Further, if τ 6= 0, then d′′u,v (s, t) = 0 if and only if sin2 γs =
sin2 γt = 0, i.e., each of γs and γt is either 0 or π. In the following, in order to make the discussions
more intuitive, we choose to use the parameters rs , rt , and τ instead of the vectors of R4 .
For each vertex u ∈ Us (t), there must be a vertex v ∈ Ut (s) such that the concatenation of su,
π(u, v), and vt is a shortest path from s to t, and we call such a vertex v a coupled t-pivot of u (if u
has more than one such vertex, then all of them are coupled t-pivots of u). Similarly, for each vertex
v ∈ Ut (s), we also define its coupled s-pivots in Us (t).
The following lemma provides a sufficient condition for a direction being an admissible direction
for s with respect to t.
Lemma 2. Suppose t is a farthest point of s and s is not visible to t.
1. For t ∈ I, a free direction rs is in R(s, t) if there is a free direction rt for t with a speed τ ≥ 0 such
that when we move s along rs with the unit speed and move t along rt with speed τ , each vertex
v ∈ Ut (s) has a coupled s-pivot u with either d′u,v (s, t) < 0, or d′u,v (s, t) = 0 and d′′u,v (s, t) = 0.
2. For t ∈ E, a free direction rs is in R(s, t) if there is a free direction rt for t that is parallel to the
polygon edge of E containing t with a speed τ ≥ 0 such that when we move s along rs with the unit
speed and move t along rt with speed τ , each vertex v ∈ Ut (s) has a coupled s-pivot u with either
d′u,v (s, t) < 0, or d′u,v (s, t) = 0 and d′′u,v (s, t) = 0.
3. For t ∈ V, a free direction rs is in R(s, t) if we move s along rs with the unit speed, each vertex
v ∈ Ut (s) has a coupled s-pivot u with either d′u,v (s, t) < 0, or d′u,v (s, t) = 0 and d′′u,v (s, t) = 0.
Proof: Suppose we move s infinitesimally along rs to s′ . The point t, as a vertex of SPM (s), corresponds
to a set Mt (s′ ) of vertices in SPM (s′ ). To prove that rs is an admissible direction for s with respect
to t, we need to show that d(s′ , t′ ) < d(s, t) for any t′ ∈ Mt (s′ ). In the following, we discuss the three
cases depending on whether s is in I, E, or V.
We remark that the proof would be much simpler if we only considered the “non-degenerate” case
whether s is in the interior of a cell of the SPM-equivalence decomposition Dspm (because in that case
Mt (s′ ) has only one vertex).
The case t ∈ I. We first prove the case t ∈ I. We begin with proving the following claim.
Claim: Suppose we move s to s′ infinitesimally along a free direction r; if there is a point t∗ in the
interior of the convex hull of the vertices of Ut (s) such that d(s′ , v) + |vt∗ | ≤ d(s, t) holds for each
v ∈ Ut (s) and d(s′ , v) + |vt∗ | < d(s, t) holds for at least one vertex v ∈ Ut (s), then r is in R(s, t).
We prove the claim as follows. Consider any t′ ∈ Mt (s′ ). To prove r ∈ R(s, t), it is sufficient is to
show that d(s′ , t′ ) < d(s, t).
Since s moves to s′ infinitesimally, the distance between t and t′ is also infinitesimal. Let H be
the convex hull of the vertices of Ut (s). By Observation 1, t is in the interior of H. Hence, t′ is
also in the interior of H. Further, since t′ ∈ Mt (s′ ) and Ut′ (s′ ) ⊆ Ut (s), it holds that d(s′ , t′ ) =
minv∈Ut (s) (d(s′ , v) + |vt′ |).
If t′ = t∗ , because there exists a vertex v ∈ Ut (s) with d(s′ , v) + |vt∗ | < d(s, t), we can obtain
′
d(s , t′ ) = minv∈Ut (s) (d(s′ , v) + |vt′ |) < d(s, t), which proves the claim. Below we assume t′ 6= t∗ .
7
v1
u1
s
t
v2
u2
Fig. 6. Suppose s and t have two shortest paths: πu1 ,v1 (s, t) and πu2 ,v2 (s, t), with s ∈ u1 u2 and t ∈ v1 v2 . If s moves
towards u1 and t moves towards v2 (or s moves towards u2 and t moves towards v1 ) for the same speed, then d′ui ,vi (s, t) = 0
and d′′ui ,vi (s, t) = 0 hold for both i = 1, 2.
We triangulate H by adding a line segment from t∗ to each vertex of H. Let △vi vj t∗ be a triangle
that contains t′ , where vi and vj are two adjacent vertices of H. Since t′ 6= t∗ , it is easy to see that at
least one of |t′ vi | < |t∗ vi | and |t′ vj | < |t∗ vj | must hold. Consequently, we can derive the following
d(s′ , t′ ) = min (d(s′ , v) + |vt′ |) ≤ min{d(s′ , vi ) + |vi t′ |, d(s′ , vj ) + |vj t′ |}
v∈Ut (s)
< max{d(s′ , vi ) + |vi t∗ |, d(s′ , vj ) + |vj t∗ |} ≤ d(s, t).
The last inequality is due to the condition in the claim that d(s′ , v) + |vt∗ | ≤ d(s, t) holds for each
v ∈ Ut (s). The claim is thus proved.
Now we are back to prove the lemma for the case t ∈ I. Suppose we move s infinitesimally along rs
with the unit speed to s′ , and move t simultaneously along rt with speed τ ; let t∗ be the point where
t is located when s arrives at s′ . Since |ss′ | is infinitesimal, |tt∗ | is also infinitesimal. In the following,
we will show that t∗ satisfies the condition in the above claim, which will lead to the lemma.
For each vi ∈ Ut (s), let ui be the coupled s-pivot of vi such that either d′ui ,vi (s, t) < 0, or d′ui ,vi (s, t) =
0 and d′′ui ,vi (s, t) = 0. Note that dui ,vi (s′ , t∗ ) is the length of a path from s′ to t∗ that is the concatenation
of s′ ui , π(ui , vi ), and vi t∗ . Similarly, d(s′ , vi ) + |vi t∗ | is also the length of a path from s′ to t∗ that is
the concatenation of π(s′ , vi ), and vi t∗ . Hence, the following holds
d(s′ , vi ) + |vi t∗ | ≤ dui ,vi (s′ , t∗ ).
(2)
On the one hand, for any vi ∈ Ut (s), since either d′ui ,vi (s, t) < 0 or d′ui ,vi (s, t) = 0, we obtain
dui ,vi (s, t) ≥ dui ,vi (s′ , t∗ ). Hence, with Inequality (2), we obtain d(s′ , vi ) + |vi t∗ | ≤ dui ,vi (s, t) for any
vi ∈ Ut (s).
On the other hand, since t ∈ I and t is a vertex of SPM (s), by Observation 1, Ut (s) has at least
three vertices. A vertex v of Ut (s) is called a special t-pivot if it has a coupled s-pivot u such that
d′u,v (s, t) = 0 and d′′u,v (s, t) = 0 (as shown in [3] this case happens only if rs is towards u and rt is leaving
v, or rs is leaving u and rt is towards v; e.g., see Fig 6). It was shown in [3] that Ut (s) has at most two
special t-pivots (e.g., see Fig 6). Hence, there is at least one vertex vi ∈ Ut (s) such that d′ui ,vi (s, t) < 0.
This implies that d(s, t) > dui ,vi (s′ , t∗ ). With Inequality (2), we have d(s′ , vi ) + |vi t∗ | < d(s, t).
The above proves that t∗ satisfies the condition in the claim. Hence, the lemma follows for the case
t ∈ I.
The case t ∈ V. We proceed on the third case t ∈ V. Recall the definitions of s′ , t′ , and Mt (s′ ) in
the beginning of the proof of the lemma. Our goal is to prove d(s, t) > d(s′ , t′ ). Note that since t is a
polygon vertex, t′ is either t or on one of the two polygon edges of E incident to t [7].
Consider any vertex v ∈ Ut (s). It has a coupled s-pivot u such that d′u,v (s, t) < 0, or d′u,v (s, t) = 0
and d′′u,v (s, t) = 0. In fact, since t does not move (i.e., τ = 0), it is not possible that both d′u,v (s, t) =
0 and d′′u,v (s, t) = 0 hold. Indeed, since τ = 0, according to Equation (1), d′u,v (s, t) = cos γs and
2
d′′u,v (s, t) = sin|su|γs . Both d′u,v (s, t) = 0 and d′′u,v (s, t) = 0 hold if and only if cos γs = sin γs = 0, which
is not possible for any angle γs . Hence, we obtain d′u,v (s, t) < 0. This implies that d(s, t) = du,v (s, t) >
|s′ u| + d(u, v) + |vt|. Further, since d(s, t) = |su| + d(u, v) + |vt|, it holds that |su| > |s′ u|.
8
Let v be any vertex of Ut′ (s′ ). By the definitions of s′ and t′ , Ut′ (s′ ) ⊆ Ut (s). Hence, v is in Ut (s).
The above shows that v has a coupled s-pivot u with d′u,v (s, t) < 0, and |su| > |s′ u|. Since v ∈ Ut′ (s′ ),
s′ u ∪ π(u, v) ∪ vt′ is a shortest path from s′ to t′ . Hence, d(s′ , t′ ) = |s′ u| + d(u, v) + |vt′ |.
If t′ = t, then since |su| > |s′ u|, it follows that d(s′ , t′ ) = |s′ u|+d(u, v)+|vt′ | < |su|+d(u, v)+|vt| =
d(s, t), which proves the lemma.
If t′ 6= t, as discussed above, t′ is on one of the two polygon edges incident to t, which implies that
Ut (s) has more than one vertex [7].
We claim that there must exist a vertex v ∈ Ut (s) such that |t′ v| ≤ |tv|. Indeed, suppose to
the contrary that |t′ v| > |tv| for every v ∈ Ut (s). Then, since t′ is in Mt (s′ ) and |ss′ | is infinitesimal, |tt′ | is also infinitesimal. Note that π(s, t) cannot be a line segment since otherwise Ut (s) would
have only one vertex, incurring contradiction. Also, due to our general position assumption that
no three polygon vertices are on the same line, since t is polygon vertex, the last three vertices
of any shortest path from s to t are not in the same line. Since |tt′ | is infinitesimal, it holds that
d(s, t′ ) = minv∈Ut (s) (d(s, v) + |vt′ |) (similar results were also proved in [3]). Since |t′ v| > |tv| for every
v ∈ Ut (s), d(s, t′ ) > minv∈Ut (s) (d(s, v) + |vt|) = d(s, t), which contradicts with that t is a farthest point
of s.
In light of the above claim, we assume |t′ vi | ≤ |tvi | for a vertex vi ∈ Ut (s). Let ui be the coupled
s-pivot of vi such that either d′ui ,vi (s, t) < 0 or d′ui ,vi (s, t) = 0. We have shown above that |sui | > |s′ ui |
Note that since t′ ∈ Mt (s′ ), it also holds that d(s′ , t′ ) = minv∈Ut (s) (d(s′ , v) + |vt′ |). Based on the above
discussion, we can derive the following,
d(s′ , t′ ) = min (d(s′ , v) + |vt′ |) ≤ d(s′ , vi ) + |vi t′ |
v∈Ut (s)
≤ |s′ ui | + d(ui , vi ) + |vi t′ | < |sui | + d(ui , vi ) + |vi t| = d(s, t).
This proves the lemma for the case t ∈ V.
The case t ∈ E. Let e be the polygon edge that contains t. Suppose we move s infinitesimally along
rs with the unit speed to s′ and move t simultaneously along rt with speed τ for the same time to
a point t∗ (i.e., t∗ is the location of t when s arrives at s′ ). Since |ss′ | is infinitesimal, |tt∗ | is also
infinitesimal. Since rt is parallel to e and t is in the interior of e, t∗ is also in the interior of e. Recall
that t corresponds to a set Mt (s′ ) of vertices in SPM (s′ ). Our goal is to prove d(s′ , t′ ) < d(s, t) for any
t′ ∈ Mt (s′ ). Consider any t′ ∈ Mt (s′ ). Below, we prove that d(s′ , t′ ) < d(s, t).
As shown in [7], t′ may be on e or not. In either case, t′ is infinitesimally close to t as |ss′ | is
infinitesimal.
Consider any vi ∈ Ut (s). Let ui be the coupled s-pivot of v such that either d′ui ,vi (s, t) < 0, or
′
dui ,vi (s, t) = 0 and d′′ui ,vi (s, t) = 0. Hence, dui ,vi (s, t) ≥ dui ,vi (s′ , t∗ ). By Observation 1, at least one
vertex of Ut (s) must be in the open half-plane bounded by the supporting line of e and containing the
interior of P in the small neighborhood of e; let vj be such a vertex. Since t moves along the direction
rt , which is parallel to e, according to Equation (1), it is not possible that d′′uj ,vj (s, t) = 0. This implies
that d′uj ,vj (s, t) < 0. Consequently, we obtain duj ,vj (s, t) > duj ,vj (s′ , t∗ ).
Next we prove the following claim: For any point q on e that is infinitesimally close to t, it holds
that minvi ∈Ut (s) (|s′ ui | + d(ui , vi ) + |vi q|) < d(s, t).
Indeed, if q = t∗ , then we have minvi ∈Ut (s) (|s′ ui | + d(ui , vi ) + |vi q|) ≤ |s′ uj | + d(uj , vj ) + |vj q| =
duj ,vj (s′ , t∗ ) < duj ,vj (s, t) = d(s, t).
Next we assume q 6= t∗ . By Observation 1, Ut (s) has at least one vertex in each of the two open
half-planes bounded by lt , where lt is the line through s and perpendicular to e. Without loss of
generality, we assume e is horizontal (e.g., see Fig. 7). Hence, there is a vertex v ′ ∈ Ut (s) strictly to the
left of lt and a vertex v ′′ ∈ Ut (s) strictly to the right of lt . Since both q and t∗ are infinitesimally close
to t, v ′ (resp., v ′′ ) is strictly to the left (resp., right) of both q and t∗ . Without loss of generality, we
9
t q t∗
v
t t∗ t′′
e
t′
e
v ′′
′
v0
v1
lt
Fig. 7. Since v ′ is to the left of both q and t∗ and q is to
the left t∗ , it holds that |v ′ q| < |v ′ t∗ |.
Fig. 8. Illustrating the proof: |v1 t∗ | > |v1 t′′ | > |v1 t′ |.
assume q is to the left of t∗ . Then, we have |qv ′ | < |t∗ v ′ |. Let v ′ be vk for some index k. Consequently,
minvi ∈Ut (s) (|s′ ui |+d(ui , vi )+|vi q|) ≤ |s′ uk |+d(uk , vk )+|vk q| < |s′ uk |+d(uk , vk )+|vk t∗ | = duk ,vk (s′ , t∗ ) ≤
duk ,vk (s, t) = d(s, t).
Therefore, the above claim is proved.
Now we are back to our original problem for proving d(s′ , t′ ) < d(s, t). Depending on whether t′ is
on e or not, there are two cases.
If t′ is on e, then since t′ is infinitesimally close to t, then by the above claim, it holds that
minvi ∈Ut (s) (|s′ ui |+d(ui , vi )+|vi t′ |) < d(s, t). Note that since t′ is in Mt (s′ ), d(s′ , t′ ) = minvi ∈Ut (s) (|s′ ui |+
d(ui , vi ) + |vi t′ |). Hence, we obtain d(s′ , t′ ) < d(s, t).
If t′ is not on e, the proof is somewhat similar in spirit to the case t ∈ I.
We begin with proving an observation that there must be a vertex v ∈ Ut (s) such that |vt′ | < |vt∗ |.
Without loss of generality, we assume e is horizontal. All vertices of Ut (s) are in one of the closed
half-planes bounded by le , where le is the horizontal line containing e. Without loss of generality, we
assume all vertices of Ut (s) are below or on the line le , i.e., they are in the closed half-plane bounded
by le from above (let h denote the half-plane). Since t′ is not on e and t′ is infinitesimally close to
t, t′ is strictly below le . Next, we do a “triangulation” around the point t∗ . Imagine that we rotate
a rightwards ray originated from t∗ clockwise to sweep the half-plane h, and let v1 , v2 , . . . vm be the
vertices of Ut (s) hit by our sweeping ray in order. Note that v1 and vm may be on e. If v1 is not on
e, let v0 be the right endpoint of e. If vm is not on e, let vm+1 be the left endpoint of e. Since t′ is
infinitesimally close to t and t′ is in h, t′ must be in one of the triangles △t∗ vi vi+1 for 0 ≤ i ≤ m.
Suppose t′ is in △t∗ vi vi+1 for some 1 ≤ i ≤ m − 1. Then, vi and vi+1 are both from Ut (s). Since t′ is
in △t∗ vi vi+1 , one of |t′ vi | < |t∗ vi | and |t′ vj | < |t∗ vj | must hold, and this proves the above observation.
If t′ is in △t∗ vi vi+1 for i = 0 or m, then one of vi and vi+1 is not in Ut (s). So we cannot use the
same argument as above. In the following, we only prove the case for i = 0, and the other case is
similar. When t′ is in △t∗ v0 v1 , v0 is the right endpoint of e and v1 is not on e (e.g., see Fig. 8). In the
following, we show that |v1 t′ | < |v1 t∗ |, which will prove the observation.
By Observation 1, Ut (s) has at least one vertex strictly to right of the vertical line through t. Since
is infinitesimal, Ut (s) has at least one vertex strictly to the right of the vertical line lt∗ through
t∗ as well. By the definition of v1 , v1 must be strictly to the right of lt∗ . Hence, the slope of the line
through v1 and t∗ is strictly negative. Recall that t′ is in △t∗ v0 v1 . If t′ is on v1 t∗ , then since t′ 6= t∗
(due to t′ 6∈ e), we have |v1 t∗ | > |v1 t′ |. Otherwise, we extend v1 t′ until it hits v0 t∗ at a point t′′ , which
is strictly to the right of t∗ . Since both t∗ and t′ are infinitesimally close to t, |t∗ t′ | is also infinitesimal
and thus |t∗ t′′ | is infinitesimal as well. Since the slope of v1 t∗ is strictly negative and t′′ is strictly to
the right of t∗ , we obtain |v1 t∗ | > |v1 t′′ | > |v1 t′ |.
|tt∗ |
The above proves the observation.
In light of the above observation, we assume |t′ vi | < |t∗ vi | for a vertex vi ∈ Ut (s). Let ui be
the coupled s-pivot of vi such that either d′ui ,vi (s, t) < 0, or d′ui ,vi (s, t) = 0. Note that dui ,vi (s, t) ≥
dui ,vi (s′ , t∗ ). Since t′ is in Mt (s′ ), d(s′ , t′ ) = minv∈Ut (s) (d(s′ , v) + |vt′ |). Based on the above discussion,
10
t
hs (t)
s
Fig. 9. Illustrating Observation 2: The blue direction is towards the interior of hs (t) and thus is in R(s, t).
we derive the following
d(s′ , t′ ) = min (d(s′ , v) + |vt′ |) ≤ d(s′ , vi ) + |vi t′ | < d(s′ , vi ) + |vi t∗ |
v∈Ut (s)
≤ |s′ ui | + d(ui , vi ) + |vi t∗ | = dui ,vi (s′ , t∗ ) ≤ dui ,vi (s, t) = d(s, t).
This proves that d(s′ , t′ ) < d(s, t). This finishes the proof for the case t ∈ E.
The lemma is thus proved for all three cases.
Lemma 2 is on the case where s is not visible to t. If s is visible to t, the result is trivial, as shown
in Observation 2.
Observation 2 Suppose t is a farthest point of s and s is visible to t. Then t must be a polygon vertex
of V. Further, a free direction rs of s is in R(s, t) if and only if rs is towards the interior of hs (t),
where hs (t) is the open half-plane containing t and bounded by the line through s and perpendicular to
st (e.g., see Fig. 9).
Proof: Since s is visible to t, st is the only shortest path from s to t. As t is a vertex of SPM (s), t
cannot be in I or E, since otherwise there would be more than one shortest s-t path. Thus, t ∈ V.
Consider any free direction rs of s. Suppose we move s infinitesimally along rs to s′ . According
to our definition of “visibility”, st does not contain any polygon vertex in its interior. Since |ss′ | is
infinitesimal, s′ is also visible to t. Therefore, the point t, as a vertex of SPM (s), corresponds to a
vertex of SPM (s′ ) that is t itself. Hence, rs is in R(s, t) if and only |s′ t| < |st|. Clearly, |s′ t| < |st| if
and only if rs is towards the interior of the open half-plane hs (t).
By Observation 2, if s is visible to t, then the range R(s, t) is the intersection of the free direction
range Rf (s) and an open range of size π delimited by the open half-plane hs (t).
The next lemma is proved by using Lemmas 1 and 2 as well as Observation 2.
Lemma 3. Among all points of P that have topologically equivalent shortest path maps in P, there is
at most one geodesic center. This implies that each cell or edge of Dspm contains at most one geodesic
center in its interior, which further implies that the number of geodesic centers of P is O(|Dspm |),
where |Dspm | is the combinatorial complexity of Dspm .
Proof: Let Q be any set of points of P that have topologically equivalent shortest path maps in P.
We show that there is at most one geodesic center in Q, which will prove the lemma. Note that any
two points of Q must be visible to each other since otherwise their shortest path maps would not
be topologically equivalent. Let s be a geodesic center in Q. Let s′ be any other point in Q. In the
following, we prove that dmax (s′ ) > dmax (s), which implies that s′ cannot be a geodesic center, and
thus the lemma will be proved.
Consider the direction rs of moving s towards s′ . Since s is visible to s′ , rs is a free direction. Since
s is a geodesic center, by Lemma 1, R(s) is empty. Thus, s has a farthest point t such that rs 6∈ R(s, t).
Because t is a farthest point of s, d(s, t) = dmax (s).
If s is visible to t, by Observation 2, rs is not towards the interior of the open half-plane hs (t).
Hence, |s′ t| > |st|, and thus dmax (s′ ) ≥ d(s′ , t) ≥ |s′ t| > |st| = d(s, t) = dmax (s).
In the following, we assume that s is not visible to t. Depending on whether t is in V, E, or I,
there are three cases.
11
The case t ∈ V. Suppose t ∈ V. Due to rs 6∈ R(s, t), by Lemma 2(3), if we move s along rs with unit
speed, there exists a vertex v ∈ Ut (s) such that either d′u,v (s, t) > 0, or d′u,v (s, t) = 0 and d′′u,v (s, v) 6= 0,
for any coupled s-pivot u of v. Let u be any coupled s-pivot of v.
Note that su ∪ π(u, v) ∪ vt is a shortest path from s to t, whose length is du,v (s, t). Since SPM (s)
and SPM (s′ ) are topologically equivalent and t is a polygon vertex, s′ u ∪ π(u, v) ∪ vt is a shortest path
from s′ to t, whose length is du,v (s′ , t). In the following, we show that du,v (s′ , t) > du,v (s, t).
Indeed, as s moves towards s′ along rs with unit speed, recall that the second derivative d′′u,v (s, t) ≥
0 always holds. Hence, if d′u,v (s, t) > 0, then during the movement of s, it always holds that d′u,v (s, t) >
0. This implies that du,v (s′ , t) > du,v (s, t). Similarly, if d′u,v (s, t) = 0 and d′′u,v (s, t) 6= 0, then since
d′′u,v (s, t) ≥ 0, we obtain d′′u,v (s, t) > 0. Consequently, as s moves towards s′ along rs with unit speed,
except for the starting moment, it holds that d′u,v (s, t) > 0 and d′′u,v (s, t) ≥ 0. Thus, du,v (s′ , t) >
du,v (s, t).
The above proves that d(s′ , t) = du,v (s′ , t) > du,v (s, t) = d(s, t). Therefore, we obtain dmax (s′ ) >
dmax (s) since dmax (s′ ) ≥ d(s′ , t) > d(s, t) = dmax (s).
The case t ∈ E. If t ∈ E, let e denote the polygon edge of E that contains t. Due to rs 6∈ R(s, t), by
Lemma 2(2), if we move s along rs with unit speed and move t along e with any speed τ ≥ 0, there
exists a vertex v ∈ Ut (s) such that either d′u,v (s, t) > 0, or d′u,v (s, t) = 0 and d′′u,v (s, v) 6= 0, for any
coupled s-pivot u of v. Let u be any coupled s-pivot of v.
Note that su ∪ π(u, v) ∪ vt is a shortest path from s to t, whose length is du,v (s, t). Since SPM (s)
and SPM (s′ ) are topologically equivalent and t ∈ e, the point t, as a vertex of SPM (s), corresponds
to one and only one vertex t′ in SPM (s′ ) that is also on e. Then, s′ u ∪ d(u, v) ∪ vt′ is a shortest path
from s′ to t′ , whose length is du,v (s′ , t′ ). In the following, we show that du,v (s′ , t′ ) > du,v (s, t), which
will lead to dmax (s′ ) > dmax (s) as dmax (s′ ) ≥ d(s′ , t′ ) = du,v (s′ , t′ ) and dmax (s) = d(s, t) = du,v (s, t).
Suppose we move s along rs towards s′ with unit speed and move t along e towards t′ with speed
τ = |tt′ |/|ss′ |. Hence, when s arrives at s′ , t arrives at t′ simultaneously. By Lemma 2(2), either
d′u,v (s, t) > 0, or d′u,v (s, t) = 0 and d′′u,v (s, v) 6= 0. In either case, by the same analysis as in the above
case t ∈ V, we can show that du,v (s′ , t′ ) > du,v (s, t) and we omit the details.
The case t ∈ I. The proof for this case is very similar. Due to rs 6∈ R(s, t), by Lemma 2(1), if we move
s along rs with unit speed and move t along any free direction with any speed τ ≥ 0, there exists a
vertex v ∈ Ut (s) such that either d′u,v (s, t) > 0, or d′u,v (s, t) = 0 and d′′u,v (s, v) 6= 0, for any coupled
s-pivot u of v.
Since SPM (s) and SPM (s′ ) are topologically equivalent, t corresponds to one and only one vertex
t′ in SPM (s′ ) that is also in I. The rest of the argument is exactly the same as that for the case t ∈ E.
We can prove that dmax (s′ ) > dmax (s) and we omit the details.
This completes the proof for the lemma.
Remark: By extending the proof of Lemma 3, it is possible to obtain a slightly stronger result:
Every cell (including its boundary) of Dspm contains at most one geodesic center.
The following corollary can be proved by the same techniques as Lemma 3, and it implies that if
t is a farthest point of s, then slightly moving s along a free direction that is not in R(s, t) can never
obtain a geodesic center.
Corollary 1. Suppose t is a farthest point of s. If we move s infinitesimally along a free direction
that is not in R(s, t), then dmax (s) will become strictly larger.
Proof: Let rs be any free direction that is not in R(s, t). Suppose we move s infinitesimally along rs
to s′ . By using exactly the same argument as in the proof of Lemma 3, we can show that SPM (t) has
a vertex t′ corresponding to t in SPM (s) such that d(s, t) < d(s′ , t′ ). Therefore, we obtain dmax (s) =
d(s, t) < d(s′ , t′ ) ≤ dmax (s′ ), which proves the corollary.
12
So far we have shown that the total number of geodesic centers is bounded by the combinatorial
size of Dspm. This result, although it is interesting in its own right, is not quite helpful for computing
the geodesic centers. In order to compute candidate points for geodesic centers, we need to find a way
to determine the range R(s, t). It turns out that it is sufficient to determine R(s, t) when t is in a
non-degenerate position with respect to s in the following sense: Suppose t is a farthest point of s;
we say that t is non-degenerate with respect to s if there are exactly three, two, and one shortest s-t
paths for t in I, E, and V, respectively (by Observation 1, this implies that |Ut (s)| is 3, 2, and 1,
respectively for the three cases).
Lemma 2 gives a sufficient condition for a direction in R(s, t). The following lemma gives both a
sufficient and a necessary condition for a direction in R(s, t) when t is non-degenerate, and the lemma
will be used to explicitly compute the range R(s, t) in Section 4. Note that Observation 2 already gives
a way to determine R(s, t) when s is visible to t.
Lemma 4. Suppose t is a non-degenerate farthest point of s and s is not visible to t. Then, a free
direction rs is in R(s, t) if and only if
1. for t ∈ I, there is a free direction rt for t with a speed τ ≥ 0 such that when we move s along rs
with unit speed and move t along rt with speed τ , each vertex v ∈ Ut (s) has a coupled s-pivot u
with d′u,v (s, t) < 0.
2. for t ∈ E, there is a free direction rt for t that is parallel to the polygon edge containing t with a
speed τ ≥ 0 such that when we move s along rs with unit speed and move t along rt with speed τ ,
each vertex v ∈ Ut (s) has a coupled s-pivot u with d′u,v (s, t) < 0.
3. for t ∈ V, when we move s along rs with unit speed, each vertex v ∈ Ut (s) has a coupled s-pivot u
with d′u,v (s, t) < 0.
Proof: First of all, in any of these three cases, if the condition in the lemma statement holds, by
Lemma 2, rs is in R(s, t). In the following, we prove the other direction of the lemma.
Let rs be in R(s, t). Suppose we move s along rs infinitesimally to s′ . Since t is non-degenerate
with respect to s, the point t, as a vertex of SPM (s), corresponds to one and only one vertex t′ in
SPM (s′ ) (i.e., Mt (s′ ) = {t′ }) [7]. Due to rs ∈ R(s, t), d(s, t) > d(s′ , t′ ). In the following, we prove the
three cases: t ∈ I, t ∈ E, and t ∈ V.
The case t ∈ I. Suppose we move s towards s′ with unit speed and move t towards t′ with speed
|tt′ |/|ss′ |. Then, when s arrives at s′ , t arrives at t′ simultaneously.
Consider any vertex v ∈ Ut (s). To prove the lemma for this case, our goal is to show that there
exists a coupled s-pivot u of v with d′u,v (s, t) < 0.
Let u be any coupled s-pivot of v. Hence, d(s, t) = du,v (s, t). Since Mt (s′ ) = {t′ }, s′ u ∪ π(u, v) ∪ vt′
is a shortest path from s′ to t′ , and thus d(s′ , t′ ) = du,v (s′ , t′ ). We claim that d′u,v (s, t) < 0. Suppose
to the contrary that d′u,v (s, t) ≥ 0. If d′u,v (s, t) > 0, then we would obtain du,v (s, t) < du,v (s′ , t′ ), which
contradicts with d(s, t) > d(s′ , t′ ). Similarly, if d′u,v (s, t) = 0, since d′′u,v (s, t) ≥ 0, we would obtain
du,v (s, t) ≤ du,v (s′ , t′ ), which contradicts with d(s, t) > d(s′ , t′ ). Hence, d′u,v (s, t) < 0 is proved.
This proves the lemma for the case t ∈ I.
The case t ∈ E. Let e be the polygon edge containing t. Then, t′ is also on e. Suppose we move s
towards s′ with unit speed and move t on e towards t′ with speed |tt′ |/|ss′ |. Hence, when s arrives at
s′ , t arrives at t′ simultaneously.
Consider any vertex v ∈ Ut (s). Let u be any coupled s-pivot of v. As in the above case, du,v (s, t) =
d(s, t) and du,v (s′ , t′ ) = d(s′ , t′ ). Using the same analysis as in the above case we can also prove that
d′u,v (s, t) < 0, which leads to the lemma.
13
The case t ∈ V. In this case, since t is a polygon vertex, t′ = t. Suppose we move s towards s′ with unit
speed. Consider any vertex v ∈ Ut (s). Let u be any coupled s-pivot of v. Again, du,v (s, t) = d(s, t) and
du,v (s′ , t′ ) = d(s′ , t′ ). Using the same analysis as in the first case we can also prove that d′u,v (s, t) < 0,
which leads to the lemma.
Lemma 4 will be used to determine the range R(s, t) for a non-degenerate farthest point of s. The
details are deferred in Section 4, where we will show that R(s, t) is the intersection of the free direction
range Rf (s) and an open range of size π (i.e., the previously mentioned π-range property).
In addition, we present Lemma 5, which will be useful for computing the candidate points in
Section 5. If a farthest point t of s is not non-degenerate, then we say that t is degenerate (note that s
cannot be visible to t in the degenerate case). Lemma 5 provides a sufficient condition for a direction
in R(s, t) particularly for a degenerate farthest point t of s.
Lemma 5. Suppose t is a degenerate farthest point of s.
1. For t ∈ I, a free direction rs is in R(s, t) if the following conditions are satisfied: (1) there exist
three vertices v1 , v2 , v3 ∈ Ut (s) such that t is in the interior of the triangle △v1 v2 v3 (i.e., {v1 , v2 , v3 }
satisfies the same condition as Ut (s) in Observation 1(1)); (2) there exists a free direction rt for
t with a speed τ ≥ 0 such that when we move s along rs with unit speed and move t along rt with
speed τ , each vertex v ∈ {v1 , v2 , v3 } has a coupled s-pivot u with d′u,v (s, t) < 0.
2. For t ∈ E, suppose e is the polygon edge containing t. A free direction rs is in R(s, t) if the
following conditions are satisfied: (1) there exist two vertices v1 , v2 ∈ Ut (s) such that {v1 , v2 } has
one vertex in each of the two open half-planes bounded by the line through t and perpendicular to
e, and {v1 , v2 } has at least one vertex in the open half-plane bounded by the supporting line of e
and containing the interior of P in the small neighborhood of e (i.e., {v1 , v2 } satisfies the same
condition as Ut (s) in Observation 1(2)); (2) there is a free direction rt for t parallel to e with a
speed τ ≥ 0 such that when we move s along rs with unit speed and move t along rt with speed τ ,
each vertex v ∈ {v1 , v2 } has a coupled s-pivot u with d′u,v (s, t) < 0.
Proof: The proof uses similar techniques as in the proof of Lemma 2. Indeed, the proof of Lemma 2
mainly relies on Observation 1. Here, for the case t ∈ I, {v1 , v2 , v3 } satisfies Observation 1(1); for the
case t ∈ E, {v1 , v2 } satisfies Observation 1(2). Therefore, similar techniques as in the proof of Lemma
2 can be used here. We briefly discuss it below.
The case t ∈ I. We first consider the case t ∈ I. Let v1 , v2 , and v3 be the polygon vertices specified in
the lemma statement. For each i with 1 ≤ i ≤ 3, let ui be the coupled s-pivot of vi with d′ui ,vi (s, t) < 0.
Suppose we move s along rs infinitesimally with unit speed to s′ and simultaneously move t along rt
with speed τ to a point t∗ (i.e., t∗ is the location of t when s arrives at s′ ). Since |ss′ | is infinitesimal,
|tt∗ | is also infinitesimal. Since t is in the interior of △v1 v2 v3 , t∗ is also in the interior of the triangle.
Consider any t′ in Mt (s′ ). To prove that rs is in R(s, t), our goal is to show that d(s′ , t′ ) < d(s, t).
Since |ss′ | is infinitesimal, |tt′ | is also infinitesimal and t′ is also in the interior of △v1 v2 v3 . For
each 1 ≤ i ≤ 3, since d′ui ,vi (s, t) < 0, it holds that dui ,vi (s, t) > dui ,vi (s′ , t∗ ). The three segments t∗ vi
for i = 1, 2, 3 partition △v1 v2 v3 into three smaller triangles and t′ must be one of them. Without
loss of generality, assume t′ is in △v1 v2 t∗ . Hence, at least one of |t′ v1 | < |t∗ v1 | and |t′ v2 | < |t∗ v2 |
holds. Without loss of generality, we assume the former one holds. Therefore, we can derive d(s′ , t′ ) ≤
|s′ u1 | + d(u1 , v1 ) + |v1 t′ | < |s′ u1 | + d(u1 , v1 ) + |v1 t∗ | = du1 ,v1 (s′ , t∗ ) < du1 ,v1 (s, t) = d(s, t).
The case t ∈ E. Let v1 and v2 be the two polygon vertices specified in the lemma statement. For each
i with 1 ≤ i ≤ 2, let ui be the coupled s-pivot of vi with d′ui ,vi (s, t) < 0. Suppose we move s along
rs infinitesimally with unit speed to s′ and simultaneously move t along e with speed τ to a point t∗ .
Since |ss′ | is infinitesimal, |tt∗ | is also infinitesimal. Consider any t′ in Mt (s′ ). To prove that rs is in
R(s, t), our goal is to show that d(s′ , t′ ) < d(s, t).
14
For each 1 ≤ i ≤ 2, since d′ui ,vi (s, t) < 0, it holds that dui ,vi (s, t) > dui ,vi (s′ , t∗ ). Since |tt∗ | is
infinitesimal, {v1 , v2 } has one vertex in each of the open half-planes bounded by the line through t∗
and perpendicular to e. Also, because at least one vertex of v1 and v2 is in the open half-plane bounded
by the supporting line of e and containing the interior of P in the small neighborhood of e, regardless
of whether t′ is on e or not, we can use the similar approach as in the proof of Lemma 2 (for the case
t ∈ E) to show that either |t′ v1 | < |t∗ v1 | or |t′ v2 | < |t∗ v2 | holds. Consequently, by the similar argument
as the above case for t ∈ I, we can obtain d(s′ , t′ ) < d(s, t).
4
Determining the Admissible Direction Range R(s, t) and the π-Range
Property
In this section, we determine the admissible direction range R(s, t) for any point s and any of its nondegenerate farthest point t. In particular, we will prove the π-range property mentioned in Section
1.
Depending on whether t is in V, E, and I, there are three cases. Recall that Rf (s) is the range of
all free directions of s. In each case, we will show that R(s, t) is the intersection of Rf (s) and an open
range Rπ (s, t) of size π. We call Rπ (s, t) the π-range. As will be seen later, the π-range Rπ (s, t) can
be explicitly determined based on the positions of s, t, and the vertices of Us (t) and Ut (s).
In fact, for each case, we will give more general results that are on shortest path distance functions.
These more general results will also be useful for computing the candidate points later in Section 5.
4.1
The Case t ∈ V
We first discuss the case t ∈ V. The result is relatively straightforward in this case. If s is visible to
t, the π-range Rπ (s, t) is defined to be the open range of directions delimited by the open half-plane
hs (t) as defined in Observation 2; by Observation 2, R(s, t) = Rf (s) ∩ Rπ (s, t).
In the following, we assume s is not visible to t. We first present a more general result on a shortest
path function. Let s and t be any two points in P such that t is in V and s is not visible to t. Let
π(s, t) be any shortest s-t path in P. Let u and v be the s-pivot and t-pivot in π(s, t), respectively.
Thus, du,v (s, t) = |su| + d(u, v) + |vt|. Now we consider du,v (s, t) as a function of s and t in the entire
plane R2 (not only in P; namely, when we move s and t, they are allowed to move outside P, but the
function du,v (s, t) is always defined as |su| + d(u, v) + |vt|, where d(u, v) is a fixed value).
The π-range Rπ (s, t) is defined with respect to t and the path π(s, t) as follows: a direction rs for
s is in Rπ (s, t) if d′u,v (s, t) < 0 when we move s along rs with unit speed. The following lemma is quite
straightforward.
Lemma 6. The π-range Rπ (s, t) is exactly the open range of size π delimited by hs (u), where hs (u)
is the open half-plane containing u and bounded by the line through s and perpendicular to su.
Proof: The analysis is similar to Observation 2. Suppose we move s along a direction rs with unit
speed. Then, d′u,v (s, t) < 0 if and only if rs is towards the interior of hs (u).
Now we are back to our original problem to determine R(s, t) for a non-degenerate farthest point
t of s with t ∈ V. Since t is non-degenerate and t is in V, there is only one shortest path π(s, t) from s
to t. We define Rπ (s, t) as above. Based on Observation 2 and Lemmas 4(3), we have Lemma 7, and
thus R(s, t) can be determined by Observation 2 and Lemma 6.
Lemma 7. R(s, t) = Rf (s) ∩ Rπ (s, t).
Proof: If s is visible to t, we have already shown that the lemma is true. Below we assume s is not
visible to t.
Let u and v be the s-pivot and t-pivot in π(s, t), respectively. Note that v is the only vertex in
Ut (s) and u is the only vertex in Us (t).
15
1. Consider any direction rs ∈ R(s, t), i.e., rs is an admissible direction for s with respect to t.
According to Lemma 4(3), when we move s along rs with unit speed, it holds that d′u,v (s, t) < 0. This
implies that rs is in Rπ (s, t). Since rs is in R(s, t), rs is in Rf (s). Therefore, rs is in Rf (s)∩ Rπ (s, t).
2. Consider any direction rs in Rf (s) ∩ Rπ (s, t). First of all, rs is a free direction. Since rs is in
Rπ (s, t), when s moves along rs with unit speed, d′u,v (s, t) < 0. Since v is the only vertex in Ut (s),
by Lemma 4(3), rs is in R(s, t).
The lemma is thus proved.
4.2
The Case t ∈ E
The analysis for this case is substantially more complicated than the previous case, although the next
case for t ∈ I is even more challenging. One may consider the analysis for this case as a “warm-up”
for the most general case t ∈ I.
As in the previous case, we first present a more general result that is on two shortest path distance
functions. Let s and t be any two points in P such that t is in E and there are two shortest s-t paths
π1 (s, t) and π2 (s, t) (this implies that s is not visible to t). Let e be the polygon edge containing t
and let l(e) denote the line containing e. For each i = 1, 2, let πi (s, t) = πui ,vi (s, t), i.e., ui and vi are
the s-pivot and t-pivot of πi (s, t), respectively. We further require the set {v1 , v2 } satisfy the same
condition as Ut (s) in Observation 1(2), i.e., {v1 , v2 } has at least one vertex in the open half-plane
bounded by l(e) and containing the interior of P in the small neighborhood of e, and it has at least
one vertex in each of the two open half-planes bounded by the line through t and perpendicular to e.
We say that the two shortest paths π1 (s, t) and π2 (s, t) are canonical with respect to s and t if {v1 , v2 }
satisfies the above condition. In the following, we assume π1 (s, t) and π2 (s, t) are canonical. Note that
the condition implies that v1 6= v2 . However, u1 = u2 is possible.
For each i = 1, 2, we consider dui ,vi (s, t) = |sui | + d(ui , vi ) + |vi t| as a function of s ∈ R2 (instead
of s ∈ P only) and t ∈ e.
In this case, the π-range Rπ (s, t) of s is defined with respect to t and the two paths π1 (s, t) and
π2 (s, t) as follows: a direction rs for s is in Rπ (s, t) if there exists a direction rt parallel to e for t with
a speed τ ≥ 0 such that when we move s along rs with unit speed and move t along rt with speed
τ ≥ 0, d′ui ,vi (s, t) < 0 holds for i = 1, 2.
In Section 4.1, we showed that the π-range for the case s ∈ V is an open range of size π. Here we
will show a similar result in Lemma 8 unless a special case happens. Although the analysis in Section
4.1 is quite straightforward, the result here for two functions dui ,vi (s, t) with i = 1, 2 is somewhat
surprising and the proof is substantially more difficult (one could imagine that a similar result for
three functions, as shown in Section 4.4, is even more surprising). Before presenting Lemma 8, we
introduce some notation.
→
For any two points p and q in the plane, define −
pq as the direction from p to q.
Recall that the angle of any direction r is defined to be the angle in [0, 2π) counterclockwise from
→, and let α denote the
the positive direction of the x-axis. Let α1 denote the angle of the direction −
su
1
2
→ (e.g., see Fig. 10). Note that by our way of defining pivot vertices, α = α
angle of the direction −
su
2
1
2
if and only if u1 = u2 .
Note that v1 and v2 are in a closed half-plane bounded by the line l(e). We assign a direction to
l(e) such that each of v1 and v2 are to the left or on l(e). Define βi as the smallest angle to rotate
−
→
l(e) counterclockwise such that the direction of l(e) becomes the same as the direction tvi , for each
i = 1, 2 (e.g., see Fig. 10). Hence, both β1 and β2 are in [0, π]. Without of loss of generality, we assume
β1 ≤ β2 (otherwise the analysis is symmetric). Since {v1 , v2 } contains at least one vertex in each of
the open half-planes bounded by the line through t and perpendicular to e, we have β1 ∈ [0, π/2) and
β2 ∈ (π/2, π]. Further, since at least one of v1 and v2 is not on l(e), it is not possible that both β = 0
and β = π hold.
16
v2
u2
v1
β2
β1
u1
α2
α1
l(e)
s
t
Fig. 10. Illustrating the definitions of the angles.
u2
u1
u2
u1 = u2
s
α2
α1
v2
v1
t
v1
v2
α1
s
26.66◦
β2
v1
s
v2
u1
β1
t
t
Fig. 11. Illustrating several concrete examples for Lemma 8. Left: the special case (the vertical line through t bisects
∠v1 tv2 ); in this case, Rπ (s, t) = ∅. Middle: the case where α1 = α2 , and thus α = 0, sin(α) = 0, and u1 = u2 ; in this case,
Rπ (s, t) = (α1 −π/2, α1 +π/2), which is delimited by the open half-plane (marked with red color in the figure) bounded by
the line through s and perpendicular to su1 . Right: the most general case where α1 = 30◦ , α2 = 90◦ , β1 = 30◦ , β2 = 135◦ ;
γ
by calculation, λ ≈ 1.3165, arctan( sin(α)
) ≈ 56.66◦ , and thus, Rπ (s, t) ≈ (α1 − 56.66◦ , α1 + 56.66◦ ) = (−26.66◦ , 153.34◦ );
the open half-plane that delimits Rπ (s, t) is marked with red color in the figure.
Let α = α2 − α1 . We refer to the case where β1 + β2 = π and α = ±π (i.e., α is π or −π) as the
special case. In the special case, s is on u1 u2 and the vertical line through t and perpendicular to l(e)
bisects the angle ∠v1 tv2 .
Lemma 8. The π-range Rπ (s, t) is determined as follows (e.g., see Fig. 11).
Rπ (s, t) =
λ
λ
), α1 − arctan( sin(α)
) + π)
(α1 − arctan( sin(α)
λ
λ
(α1 − arctan( sin(α) ) − π, α1 − arctan( sin(α) ))
(α1 − π/2, α1 + π/2)
(α1 − 3π/2, α1 − π/2)
∅
if sin(α) > 0,
if sin(α) < 0,
if sin(α) = 0 and λ > 0,
if sin(α) = 0 and λ < 0,
if sin(α) = 0 and λ = 0,
β2
where λ = cos α − cos
cos β1 . Further, α = ±π and β1 + β2 = π (i.e., the special case) if and only if
sin(α) = 0 and λ = 0.
Remark: Unlike Lemma 6 whose geometric intuition is very straightforward, it is not clear to us how
to interpret Lemma 8 intuitively.
We defer the proof of Lemma 8 to Section 4.3. According to Lemma 8, if the special case happens,
Rπ (s, t) is empty; otherwise, it is an open range of size exactly π. Since α = 0 if and only if u1 = u2 ,
the case u1 = u2 is also covered by the lemma.
Now we are back to our original problem to determine the range R(s, t) for a non-degenerate
farthest point t ∈ E of s. By Observation 2, s is not visible to t. Further, s and t have exactly
two shortest paths π1 (s, t) and π2 (s, t). Clearly, by Observation 1(2), the two paths are canonical.
Therefore, the π-range Rπ (s, t) of s with respect to t and the two shortest paths π1 (s, t) and π2 (s, t)
can be determined by Lemma 8.
By using Lemma 4(2), we have the following lemma.
17
s
P
t
Fig. 12. Illustrating an example in which a geodesic center s is in I and has only one farthest point t. The polygonal
domain P is between two (very close) concentric squares plus an additional (very small) triangle so that s is in I. The
point s is at the middle of the top edge of the inner square, and t is at the middle of the bottom edge of the outer square.
One can verify that s is a geodesic center and t is the only farthest point of s. The two shortest paths from s to t are
shown with red dashed segments. Note that the middle point of every edge of the inner square is a geodesic center.
Lemma 9. R(s, t) = Rπ (s, t) ∩ Rf (s).
Proof: For each i = 1, 2, let ui and vi be the s-pivot and t-pivot of the shortest path πi (s, t), respectively. Since s and t have only two shortest paths π1 (s, t) and π2 (s, t), Ut (s) = {v1 , v2 } and
Us (t) = {u1 , u2 }. Further, for each i = 1, 2, vi has only one s-pivot, which is ui .
1. Consider any direction rs ∈ R(s, t). Clearly, rs ∈ Rf (s). By Lemma 4(2), there exists a direction
rt parallel to e for t with a speed τ ≥ 0 such that if we move s along rs for unit speed and move
t along lt with speed τ , each vertex v ∈ Ut (s) has a coupled s-pivot u with d′u,v (s, t) < 0. Since
Ut (s) = {v1 , v2 } and for each i = 1, 2, vi has only one s-pivot ui , it holds that d′ui ,vi (s, t) < 0.
Hence, rs is in Rπ (s, t).
2. Consider any rs in Rf (s, t) ∩ Rπ (s, t). First of all, rs is a free direction. Since rs is in Rπ (s, t), there
exists a direction rt parallel to e for t with a speed τ ≥ 0 such that if we move s along rs for unit
speed and move t along rt with speed τ , d′ui ,vi (s, t) < 0 for each i = 1, 2. Since Ut (s) = {v1 , v2 },
according to Lemma 4(2), rs is in R(s, t).
The lemma thus follows.
Suppose t is the only farthest point of s and t is non-degenerate. According to Lemma 8, if the
special case happens, Rπ (s, t) = ∅, and thus R(s, t) = ∅ by Lemma 9. By Corollary 1, whenever we
move s along any free direction infinitesimally, the value dmax (s) will be strictly increasing. Therefore,
it is possible that the point s, which is in I and has only one farthest point, is a geodesic center. It
is not difficult to construct such an example by following the left figure of Fig. 11; e.g., see Fig. 12.
Hence, we have the following corollary.
Corollary 2. It is possible that a geodesic center is in I and has only one farthest point.
4.3
Proof of Lemma 8
Consider any direction rs for moving s. Let θs denote the angle of rs . Recall that the moving direction
rt for t is parallel to e and we have assigned a direction to the line l(e). Let θt denote the smallest angle
to rotate l(e) such that l(e) becomes the same direction as rt (thus the definition of θt is “consistent”
with the definitions of β1 and β2 ). Since rt is parallel to e, θt is either 0 or π.
According to Equation (1), we can obtain the derivatives of the two functions du1 ,v1 (s, t) and
du2 ,v2 (s, t) as follows
(
d′u1 ,v1 (s, t) = − cos(α1 − θs ) − τ · cos(β1 − θt ),
(3)
d′u2 ,v2 (s, t) = − cos(α2 − θs ) − τ · cos(β2 − θt ).
18
Therefore, for each i = 1, 2, d′ui ,vi (s, t) is a function of θs , θt , and τ . In order to simplify our proof
for Lemma 8, we first give the following lemma.
Lemma 10. A direction rs is in Rπ (s, t) if and only if there exist θt ∈ {0, π} and τ ≥ 0 such that
d′u1 ,v1 (s, t) = 0 and d′u2 ,v2 (s, t) < 0 (the same also holds if we exchange the indices 1 and 2).
Proof: Given any direction rs for s, the angle θs is fixed, and thus for each i = 1, 2, d′ui ,vi (s, t) is a
function of θt and τ . In the following, we will use d′i (θt , τ ) to represent d′ui ,vi (s, t) for each i = 1, 2.
We first prove one direction of the lemma. Assume d′1 (θt , τ ) = 0 and d′2 (θt , τ ) < 0 for some
θt ∈ {0, π} and τ ≥ 0. Our goal is to show that rs is in Rπ (s, t). To this end, it is sufficient to find
another pair (θt′ , τ ′ ) with θt′ ∈ {0, π} and τ ′ ≥ 0 such that d′1 (θt′ , τ ′ ) < 0 and d′2 (θt′ , τ ′ ) < 0.
Recall that neither β1 nor β2 can be π/2. Since θt is either 0 or π, β1 − θt 6= ±π/2, and thus
cos(β1 − θt ) 6= 0. Since d′1 (θt , τ ) = 0 and d′2 (θt , τ ) < 0, if τ > 0, regardless of whether cos(β1 − θt )
is positive or negative, we can always change τ infinitesimally to a new value τ ′ > 0 such that
d′1 (θt , τ ′ ) < 0 and d′2 (θt , τ ′ ) < 0.
If τ = 0, then by Equation (3), − cos(α1 − θs ) = 0 and − cos(α2 − θs ) < 0. We let τ ′ be an
infinitesimally small positive value and let θt′ be 0. Since β1 ∈ [0, π/2), we have cos(β1 − θt′ ) > 0, and
thus d′1 (θt′ , τ ′ ) < 0 due to − cos(α1 − θs ) = 0. Further, since τ ′ is an infinitesimal small positive value
and − cos(α2 − θs ) < 0, we have d′2 (θt′ , τ ′ ) < 0.
This proves that rs must be in Rπ (s, t).
We proceed to prove the other direction of the lemma. Assume rs is in Rπ (s, t). By the definition
of Rπ (s, t), there exist θt ∈ {0, π} and τ ≥ 0 such that d′1 (θt , τ ) < 0 and d′2 (θt , τ ) < 0. Our goal is to
find another pair (θt′ , τ ′ ) with θt′ ∈ {0, π} and τ ′ ≥ 0 such that d′1 (θt′ , τ ′ ) = 0 and d′2 (θt′ , τ ′ ) < 0.
Recall that cos(β1 − θt ) 6= 0. Depending on whether cos(β1 − θt ) is positive or negative, there are
two cases.
If cos(β1 − θt ) < 0, then cos(β2 − θt ) > 0 because β1 ∈ [0, π/2), β2 ∈ (π/2, π], and θt ∈ {0, π}. Since
τ ≥ 0, if we increase the value τ , d′1 (θt , τ ) will strictly increase and d′1 (θt , τ ) will strictly decrease.
Hence, if we keep increasing τ , there must be a moment when d′1 (θt , τ ) = 0 and d′1 (θt , τ ) < 0. We are
done with the proof.
If cos(β1 − θt ) > 0, then cos(β2 − θt ) < 0. Depending on whether τ = 0, there are two subcases.
– If τ = 0, let θt′ = (θt + π mod 2π) (i.e., we reverse the moving direction of t). Consequently, we
obtain cos(β1 − θt′ ) < 0 and cos(β2 − θt′ ) > 0. Then, we can use the same approach as above, i.e.,
keep increasing τ until d′1 (θt′ , τ ) = 0 and d′1 (θt′ , τ ) < 0.
– If τ > 0, then if we decrease τ , d′1 (θt , τ ) increases and d′2 (θt , τ ) decreases. We keep decreasing the
value τ until one of the two events happens: τ = 0 and d′1 (θt , τ ) = 0.
Whichever event happens first, it always holds that d′2 (θt , τ ) < 0. If d′1 (θt , τ ) = 0 happens first (or
both events happen simultaneously), we are done with the proof. Otherwise, we obtain τ = 0 and
both d′1 (θt , τ ) and d′2 (θt , τ ) are negative. Then, we can use the same approach as the above case
for τ = 0 to prove.
This completes the proof for the lemma.
To simplify the notation, let w1 = −d′u1 ,v1 (s, t) and w2 = −d′u2 ,v2 (s, t). Once rs is fixed (and thus
θs is fixed), both w1 and w2 are implicitly considered as functions of θt ∈ {0, π} and τ ≥ 0. By Lemma
10, Rπ (s, t) consists of all directions rs for s such that there exist θt ∈ {0, π} and τ ≥ 0 with w1 = 0
and w2 > 0.
Let x = α1 − θs . Recall that α = α2 − α1 . Then, α2 − θs = x + α. Thus, we have
(
w1 = cos(x) + τ · cos(β1 − θt ),
w2 = cos(x + α) + τ · cos(β2 − θt ).
19
First of all, let w1 = 0. As shown in the proof of Lemma 10, since β1 ∈ [0, π/2) and θt ∈ {0, π}, it
holds that cos(β1 − θt ) 6= 0. Consequently, we have
τ =−
cos(x)
.
cos(β1 − θt )
Since τ ≥ 0 and β1 ∈ [0, π/2), we obtain the following: if cos(x) > 0, then θt = π; if cos(x) < 0, then
θt = 0; if cos(x) = 0, then θt can be either 0 or π.
cos(x)
By substituting τ with − cos(β
in w2 and using the angle sum identities of trigonometric
1 −θt )
functions, we have
w2 = cos(x + α) + τ · cos(β2 − θt )
cos(x)
· cos(β2 − θt )
cos(β1 − θt )
cos(β2 )
= cos(x) · cos(α) − sin(x) · sin(α) − cos(x) ·
.
cos(β1 )
= cos(x) · cos(α) − sin(x) · sin(α) −
The last equality in the above equation is because regardless of whether θt is 0 or π, it always holds
cos(β2 )
cos(β2 )
2 −θt )
that cos(β
cos(β1 −θt ) = cos(β1 ) . Recall that λ = cos(α) − cos(β1 ) in the statement of Lemma 8. Hence,
w2 = cos(x) · λ − sin(x) · sin(α). Therefore, w2 > 0 is equivalent to cos(x) · λ > sin(x) · sin(α).
The above discussion shows the following observation.
Observation 3 w1 = 0 and w2 > 0 if and only if the following holds:
cos(x) · λ > sin(x) · sin(α).
(4)
Depending on whether sin(α) is positive, negative, or zero, there are three cases.
1. If sin(α) > 0, depending on whether cos(x) is positive, negative, or zero, there are further three
subcases.
(a) If cos(x) > 0, then x ∈ (−π/2, π/2) and Inequality (4) is equivalent to tan(x) <
w1 = 0 and w2 > 0 if and only if x ∈
λ
sin(α) .
Thus,
λ
sin(x) .
Thus,
λ
)).
(−π/2, arctan( sin(α)
(b) If cos(x) < 0, then x ∈ (−3π/2, −π/2) and Inequality (4) is equivalent to tan(x) >
λ
)
(arctan( sin(α)
− π, −π/2).
w1 = 0 and w2 > 0 if and only if x ∈
π
(c) If cos(x) = 0, then x = ± 2 and Inequality (4) is equivalent to sin(x) < 0, which further implies
that x must be −π/2. Thus, w1 = 0 and w2 > 0 if and only if x = −π/2.
Combining the above discussions for the case sin(α) > 0, w1 = 0 and w2 > 0 if and only if
λ
λ
) − π, arctan( sin(α)
)).
x ∈ (arctan( sin(α)
2. If sin(α) < 0, the analysis is symmetric. Depending on whether cos(x) is positive, negative, or zero,
there are further three subcases.
(a) If cos(x) > 0, then x ∈ (−π/2, π/2) and Inequality (4) is equivalent to tan(x) >
w1 = 0 and w2 > 0 if and only if x ∈
λ
sin(α) .
Thus,
λ
sin(x) .
Thus,
λ
), π/2).
(arctan( sin(α)
(b) If cos(x) < 0, then x ∈ (π/2, 3π/2) and Inequality (4) is equivalent to tan(x) <
λ
(π/2, arctan( sin(α)
)+
w1 = 0 and w2 > 0 if and only if x ∈
π).
π
(c) If cos(x) = 0, then x = ± 2 and Inequality (4) is equivalent to sin(x) > 0, which further implies
that x must be π/2. Thus, w1 = 0 and w2 > 0 if and only if x = π/2.
Combining the above discussions for the case sin(α) > 0, w1 = 0 and w2 > 0 if and only if
λ
λ
), arctan( sin(α)
) + π).
x ∈ (arctan( sin(α)
20
3. If sin(α) = 0, then Inequality (4) is equivalent to cos(x)·λ > 0. Depending on whether λ is positive,
negative, or zero, there are further three subcases.
(a) If λ > 0, then Inequality (4) is equivalent to cos(x) > 0, implying that x ∈ (−π/2, π/2).
(b) If λ < 0, then Inequality (4) is equivalent to cos(x) < 0, implying that x ∈ (π/2, 3π/2).
(c) If λ = 0, then Inequality (4) is equivalent to 0 < 0, which is not possible for any x.
λ
)−
As a summary, w1 = 0 and w2 > 0 if and only if: for sin(α) > 0, x ∈ (arctan( sin(α)
λ
λ
λ
)); for sin(α) > 0, x ∈ (arctan( sin(α)
), arctan( sin(α)
) + π); for sin(α) = 0 and λ > 0,
π, arctan( sin(α)
x ∈ (−π/2, π/2); for sin(α) = 0 and λ < 0, x ∈ (π/2, 3π/2); for sin(α) = 0 and λ = 0, x ∈ ∅.
Recall that x = α1 − θs . By Lemma 10, we obtain the π-range Rπ (s, t) as follows.
λ
λ
(α1 − arctan( sin(α) ), α1 − arctan( sin(α) ) + π) if sin(α) > 0,
λ
λ
(α1 − arctan( sin(α) ) − π, α1 − arctan( sin(α) )) if sin(α) < 0,
Rπ (s, t) = (α1 − π/2, α1 + π/2)
if sin(α) = 0 and λ > 0,
(α1 − 3π/2, α1 − π/2)
if sin(α) = 0 and λ < 0,
∅
if sin(α) = 0 and λ = 0.
We complete the proof of Lemma 8 by showing the following claim: α = ±π and β1 + β2 = π if
and only if sin(α) = 0 and λ = 0. We prove the claim below.
cos(β2 )
2)
= −1 − cos(β
Assume α = ±π and β1 + β2 = π. Then, sin(α) = 0, and λ = cos(α) − cos(β
cos(β1 ) . Since
1)
β1 + β2 = π, cos(β1 ) = − cos(β2 ). Hence, λ = 0.
On the other hand, assume sin(α) = 0 and λ = 0. Then, α is 0 or ±π. We claim that α cannot
be zero. Indeed, suppose to the contrary that α = 0. Since β1 ∈ [0, π/2) and β2 ∈ (π/2, π], it always
cos(β2 )
cos(β2 )
2)
holds that cos(β
cos(β1 ) < 0. Hence, λ = cos(α) − cos(β1 ) = 1 − cos(β1 ) , which is always positive, contradicting
with λ = 0.
cos(β2 )
. Due to λ = 0, it holds that
The above proves that α = ±π. Then, we have λ = −1 − cos(β
1)
cos(β2 ) = − cos(β1 ), which implies that β1 + β2 = π since β1 ∈ [0, π/2) and β2 ∈ (π/2, π].
4.4
The Case t ∈ I
The analysis for this case is substantially more difficult than the case t ∈ E. As before, we first present
a more general result that is on three shortest path distance functions.
Let s and t be any two points in P such that t is in I and there are three shortest s-t paths π1 (s, t),
π2 (s, t), and π3 (s, t) (this implies that s is not visible to t). For each i = 1, 2, 3, let πi (s, t) = πui ,vi (s, t),
i.e., ui and vi are the s-pivot and t-pivot of πi (s, t), respectively. We say that the three paths are
canonical with respect to s and t if they have the following two properties.
1. t is in the interior of the triangle △v1 v2 v3 .
2. Suppose we reorder the indices such that v1 , v2 , and v3 are clockwise around t, then u1 , u2 , and
u3 are counterclockwise around s (e.g., see Fig. 2).
The above first property implies that v1 , v2 , and v3 are distinct, but this may not be true for
u1 , u2 , u3 . In the following, we assume that the three shortest paths πi (s, t) with 1 ≤ i ≤ 3 are
canonical, and we reorder the indices such that v1 , v2 , and v3 are clockwise around t and u1 , u2 , and
u3 are counterclockwise around s. For each i = 1, 2, 3, we consider dui ,vi (s, t) = |sui | + d(ui , vi ) + |vi t|
as a function of s ∈ R2 and t ∈ R2 .
In this case, the π-range Rπ (s, t) of s is defined with respect to t and the three paths πi (s, t) for
i = 1, 2, 3 as follows: a direction rs for s is in Rπ (s, t) if there exists a direction rt for t with a speed
τ ≥ 0 such that when we move s along rs with unit speed and move t along rt with speed τ , d′ui ,vi < 0
holds for i = 1, 2, 3.
21
u2
b2
u3
u2 = u3
b3 = 120◦
t
v1
a1 = 100◦
a2
u1
s
a3 = 140◦
v3
v3
b3 = 120◦
t
v1
a1 = 100◦
u1
s
b2
b1 = 90◦
v2
a3 = 260
◦
b1 = 90◦
v2
Fig. 13. Illustrating two concrete examples for Lemma 11. Left: The sizes of the angles of ai and bi for 1 ≤ i ≤ 3 are
2
already shown in the figure with α1 = 0. By calculation, δ ≈ 0.2426, δ1 ≈ −0.1736, δ2 ≈ 0.3072, arctan( δ1 −δ
) ≈ −63.23◦ ,
δ
◦
◦
◦
◦
◦
and thus Rπ (s, t) ≈ (α1 + 63.23 , α1 + 63.23 + 180 ) = (63.23 , 243.23 ). Right: a case where α2 = α3 with α1 = 0. Thus,
a2 = 0 and u2 = u3 . The sizes of other angles are already shown in the figure. By calculation, δ ≈ 2.1220, δ1 ≈ −0.1736,
2
δ2 ≈ −0.3768, arctan( δ1 −δ
) ≈ 5.47◦ , and thus Rπ (s, t) ≈ (α1 − 5.47◦ , α1 − 5.47◦ + 180◦ ) = (−5.47◦ , 174.53◦ ). The open
δ
half-planes that delimit Rπ (s, t) in both examples are marked with red color.
As Lemma 8 in the previous cases, we will have a similar lemma (Lemma 11), which says that
unless a special case happens the range Rπ (s, t) is an open range of size exactly π. The proof is much
more challenging. Before presenting Lemma 11, we introduce some notation.
Recall the definitions of the angles of directions. For each i = 1, 2, 3, let βi denote the angle of the
−
→
−
→
direction tvi (i.e., the angle of tvi counterclockwise from the positive x-axis). Further, we define three
angles bi for i = 1, 2, 3 as follows (e.g., see Fig. 2). Define b1 as the smallest angle we need to rotate
−
→
−
→
−
→
the direction tv1 clockwise to tv2 ; define b2 as the smallest angle we need to rotate the direction tv2
−
→
−
→
−
→
clockwise to tv3 ; define b3 as the smallest angle we need to rotate the direction tv3 clockwise to tv1 .
For any two angles α′ and α′′ , we use α′ ≡ α′′ to denote α′ = α′′ mod 2π.
It is easy to see that b1 ≡ β1 − β2 , b2 ≡ β2 − β3 , and b3 ≡ β3 − β1 . Note that since t is in the
interior of △v1 v2 v3 , it holds that bi ∈ (0, π) for i = 1, 2, 3. Note that b1 + b2 + b3 = 2π.
→. According to our definition of
For each i = 1, 2, 3, let αi denote the angle of the direction −
su
i
pivot vertices, ui = uj if and only if αi = αj for any two i, j ∈ {1, 2, 3}. We define three angles ai for
→
i = 1, 2, 3 as follows (e.g., see Fig. 2). Define a1 as the smallest angle we need to rotate the direction −
su
1
→; define a as the smallest angle we need to rotate the direction −
→ clockwise
counterclockwise to −
su
su
2
2
2
→; define a as the smallest angle we need to rotate the direction −
→ clockwise to −
→. Hence,
to −
su
su
su
3
3
3
1
a1 ≡ α2 − α1 , a2 ≡ α3 − α2 , and a3 ≡ α1 − α3 .
We refer to the case where ai = bi for each i = 1, 2, 3 as the special case.
Lemma 11. The π-range Rπ (s, t) is determined as follows (e.g., see
δ1 −δ2
2
(α1 − arctan( δ1 −δ
δ ), α1 − arctan( δ ) + π)
δ1 −δ2
δ1 −δ2
(α1 − arctan( δ ) − π, α1 − arctan( δ ))
Rπ (s, t) = (α1 − π/2, α1 + π/2)
(α1 − 3π/2, α1 − π/2)
∅
Fig. 13).
if
if
if
if
if
δ
δ
δ
δ
δ
> 0,
< 0,
= 0 and δ1 > δ2 ,
= 0 and δ1 < δ2 ,
= 0 and δ1 = δ2 ,
sin(α2 −α1 )
cos(β2 −β1 )−cos(α2 −α1 )
1 )−cos(α3 −α1 )
3 −α1 )
, and δ2 = cos(β3 −β
. Further,
where δ = sin(α
sin(β3 −β1 ) − sin(β2 −β1 ) , δ1 =
sin(β2 −β1 )
sin(β3 −β1 )
ai = bi for each i = 1, 2, 3 (i.e., the special case) if and only if δ = 0 and δ1 = δ2 .
We defer the proof of Lemma 11 to Section 4.5. According to Lemma 11, if the special case happens,
then Rπ (s, t) is empty; otherwise, it is an open range of size exactly π.
Now we are back to our original problem to determine the range R(s, t) for a non-degenerate
farthest point t ∈ I of s. Since there are exactly three shortest s-t paths πi (s, t) for i = 1, 2, 3, the
three paths must be canonical. To see this, by Observation 1, t is in the interior of △v1 v2 v3 . Further,
22
it is easy to see that no two of the three paths cross each other since otherwise there would be more
than three shortest s-t paths, this implies that the second property of the canonical paths holds. Let
Rπ (s, t) be the π-range of s with respect to t and the above three shortest paths. We have the following
result.
Lemma 12. R(s, t) = Rπ (s, t) ∩ Rf (s).
Proof: For each i = 1, 2, 3, let ui and vi be the s-pivot and t-pivot of the shortest path πi (s, t),
respectively. Since s and t have only three shortest paths, Ut (s) = {v1 , v2 , v3 } and Us (t) = {u1 , u2 , u3 }.
Further, for each i = 1, 2, 3, vi have only one s-pivot, which is ui .
1. Consider any rs ∈ R(s, t). Clearly, rs ∈ Rf (s). By Lemma 4(1), there is a direction rt for t with
a speed τ ≥ 0 such that when s moves along rs with unit speed and t moves along rt with speed
τ , each v ∈ Ut (s) has a coupled s-pivot u with d′u,v (s, t) < 0. Since Ut (s) = {v1 , v2 , v3 } and each vi
has only one s-pivot ui for each 1 ≤ i ≤ 3, we have d′ui ,vi (s, t) < 0 for i = 1, 2, 3. Hence, rs is in
Rπ (s, t).
2. Consider any rs in Rπ (s, t) ∩ Rf (s). First of all, rs is a free direction. Since rs is in Rπ (s, t), there
exists a direction rr for t with a speed τ ≥ 0 such that if s moves along rs for unit speed and t
moves along rt with speed τ , then d′ui ,vi (s, t) < 0 for i = 1, 2, 3. Since Ut (s) = {v1 , v2 , v3 }, according
to Lemma 4(1), rs is in R(s, t).
The lemma thus follows.
4.5
Proof of Lemma 11
Consider any direction rs for moving s and rt for moving t. Let θs denote the angle of the direction rs .
Let θt denote the angle of rt . According to our analysis for Equation (1), we can obtain the derivatives
of the three functions d′ui ,vi (s, t) for i = 1, 2, 3, as follows.
′
du1 ,v1 (s, t) = − cos(α1 − θs ) − τ · cos(β1 − θt ),
d′u2 ,v2 (s, t) = − cos(α2 − θs ) − τ · cos(β2 − θt ),
′
du3 ,v3 (s, t) = − cos(α3 − θs ) − τ · cos(β3 − θt ).
(5)
Therefore, for each i = 1, 2, 3, d′ui ,vi (s, t) is a function of θs , θt , and τ . In order to simplify our
proof for Lemma 11, we first give the following lemma.
Lemma 13. A direction rs is in Rπ (s, t) if and only if there exist θt ∈ [0, 2π) and τ ≥ 0 such that
d′u1 ,v1 (s, t) = 0 and d′ui ,vi (s, t) < 0 for i = 2, 3 (the same result holds if we switch the index 1 with 2 or
3).
Proof: In order to make the notation consistent with the rest of Section 4.5, instead of proving the
statement of the lemma, we prove the following statement (which is essentially the same as the lemma):
rs is in Rπ (s, t) if and only if there exist θt and τ ≥ 0 such that d′u2 ,v2 (s, t) = 0 and d′ui ,vi (s, t) < 0 for
i = 1, 3.
Let x = α1 − θs and y = β1 − θt . Hence, we have the following:
′
du1 ,v1 (s, t) = − cos(x) − τ · cos(y),
d′u2 ,v2 (s, t) = − cos(α2 − α1 + x) − τ · cos(β2 − β1 + y),
′
du3 ,v3 (s, t) = − cos(α3 − α1 + x) − τ · cos(β3 − β1 + y).
23
q
y
o
lq
Fig. 14. Illustrating the polar coordinate of q with τ = |oq|.
Consider any fixed direction rs . The angle θs is also fixed, and thus x is fixed. Hence, for each
i = 1, 2, 3, d′ui ,vi (s, t) is a function of θt and τ , and thus also a function of y and τ . In the following
proof, we will use d′i (y, τ ) to represent d′ui ,vi (s, t) for each i = 1, 2, 3.
We first prove one direction of the lemma. Suppose rs is in Rπ (s, t). Then there exist y and τ ≥ 0
such that d′i (y, τ ) < 0 for each i = 1, 2, 3. Our goal is to prove that there exit y ′ and τ ′ ≥ 0 such that
d′2 (y ′ , τ ′ ) = 0 and d′i (y ′ , τ ′ ) < 0 for i = 1, 3.
The idea is to change y and τ simultaneously in such a way that d′2 (y, τ ) is constant, but d′1 (y, τ )
strictly increases while d′3 (y, τ ) strictly decreases, and we keep making the change until d′1 (y, τ ) becomes
zero. To this end, we will find a way that when we change τ and y simultaneously, τ ·cos(y) is constant,
−τ · cos(β2 − β1 + y) increases, and −τ · cos(β3 − β1 + y) decreases, as follows.
Since cos(β2 − β1 + y) = cos(β2 − β1 ) · cos(y) − sin(β2 − β1 ) · sin(y), we have
d′2 (y, τ ) = − cos(α2 − α1 + x) − τ · cos(y) · cos(β2 − β1 ) + τ · sin(y) · sin(β2 − β1 ).
Similarly, we derive
d′3 (y, τ ) = − cos(α3 − α1 + x) − τ · cos(y) · cos(β3 − β1 ) + τ · sin(y) · sin(β3 − β1 ).
Consider a point q in a polar coordinate system with coordinate (τ, y), i.e., τ = |oq| and the polar
angle of q is y, where o is the origin (e.g., see Fig. 14). Let lq be the vertical line through q. Note that
if τ = 0, then q = o and lq is the vertical line through o.
For any point p on lq , let τp = |op| and let yp be the polar angle of p. Suppose we move p on lq
from top to bottom, it is easy to see that τp cos(yp ) is constant and τp sin(yp ) is strictly decreasing.
Based on this observation, we will find y ′ and τ ′ ≥ 0 such that d′2 (y ′ , τ ′ ) = 0 and d′i (y ′ , τ ′ ) < 0 for
i = 1, 3, as follows.
Recall that β1 − β2 ≡ b1 and b1 ∈ (0, π). Thus, sin(β2 − β1 ) < 0. Similarly, since β3 − β1 ≡ b3 and
b3 ∈ (0, π), sin(β3 − β1 ) > 0. Hence, if we change the values of y and τ simultaneously such that q
moves along lq downwards, then d′1 (y, τ ) does not change, but d′2 (y, τ ) strictly increases while d′3 (y, τ )
strictly decreases. We keep making the above change until at some moment d′2 (y, τ ) becomes zero, at
which moment we have d′2 (y, τ ) = 0 and d′2 (y, τ ) < 0 for i = 1, 3.
The above proves one direction of the lemma. Next, we prove the other direction.
Suppose there exist y and τ ≥ 0 such that d′2 (y, τ ) = 0 and d′i (y, τ ) < 0 for i = 1, 3. Our goal is to
show that there exist y ′ and τ ′ ≥ 0 such that d′i (y ′ , τ ′ ) < 0 for i = 1, 2, 3.
1. If τ > 0, depending on whether cos(β2 − β1 + y) = 0, there are two subcases.
(a) If cos(β2 − β1 + y) = 0, then it is always possible to change y infinitesimally such that cos(β2 −
β1 + y) > 0. Due to τ > 0, d′2 (y, τ ) < 0. Also, since the change of y is infinitesimal and both
cos(y) and cos(β3 − β1 + y) are continuous functions, we still have d′i (y, τ ) < 0 for i = 2, 3. We
are done with the proof.
(b) If cos(β2 − β1 + y) 6= 0, depending on whether cos(β2 − β1 + y) is positive or negative, we can
infinitesimally increase or decrease τ , such that τ is still positive and d′i (y, τ ) < 0 holds for each
i = 1, 2, 3. We are done with the proof.
24
2. If τ = 0, then again depending on whether cos(β2 − β1 + y) is positive, negative, or zero, there are
three subcases.
(a) If cos(β2 − β1 + y) > 0, then we can increase τ infinitesimally such that τ > 0 and d′i (y, τ ) < 0
for i = 1, 2, 3.
(b) If cos(β2 −β1 +y) < 0, then we first change y to y +π (i.e., the moving direction of t is reversed).
After this, since τ = 0, we still have d′2 (y, τ ) = 0 and d′i (y, τ ) < 0 for i = 1, 3. However, the
difference is that now cos(β2 − β1 + y) > 0 for the new y. Then, we can use the same analysis
as the first subcase.
(c) If cos(β2 − β1 + y) = 0, then we first slightly change y such that cos(β2 − β1 + y) > 0. Since
τ = 0, we still have d′2 (y, τ ) = 0 and d′i (y, τ ) < 0 for i = 1, 3. However, the difference is that
now cos(β2 − β1 + y) > 0 for the new y. Then, we can use the same analysis as the first subcase.
This completes the proof of the lemma.
′
To simplify the notation, let wi = −dui ,vi (s, t) for each i = 1, 2, 3. Let x = α1 − θs and y = β1 − θt .
Then, by Equation (5), we have the following.
w1 = cos(x) + τ · cos(y),
(6)
w2 = cos(α2 − α1 + x) + τ · cos(β2 − β1 + y),
w3 = cos(α3 − α1 + x) + τ · cos(β3 − β1 + y).
Once rs is fixed, both θs and x are fixed. Also, given any θt , we can determine y, and vice versa.
In the following, for each i = 1, 2, 3, we consider wi implicitly as a function of y ∈ [0, 2π) and τ ≥ 0.
By Lemma 13, Rπ (s, t) consists of all directions rs for s such that there exist y and τ ≥ 0 with w1 = 0
and wi > 0 for i = 2, 3.
Let w1 = 0. Then cos(x) + τ · cos(y) = 0. Depending on whether cos(x) is positive, negative, or
zero, there are three cases.
The case cos(x) > 0. In this case, since τ · cos(y) = − cos(x), we have τ · cos(y) < 0 and τ 6= 0.
Since τ ≥ 0, we obtain τ > 0 and cos(y) < 0, implying that y ∈ (π/2, 3π/2). Further, we have
τ = − cos(x)/ cos(y). By replacing τ with − cos(x)/ cos(y) in Equation (6) for w2 , we obtain
w2 = cos(α2 − α1 ) · cos(x) − sin(α2 − α1 ) · sin(x)
cos(x)
· cos(β2 − β1 ) · cos(y) − sin(β2 − β1 ) · sin(y)
−
cos(y)
= cos(α2 − α1 ) · cos(x) − sin(α2 − α1 ) · sin(x)
− cos(β2 − β1 ) · cos(x) + sin(β2 − β1 ) · tan(y) · cos(x).
Since cos(x) > 0, if we divide the right side of the above formula by cos(x), we obtain that w2 > 0 if
and only if
cos(α2 − α1 ) − sin(α2 − α1 ) · tan(x) − cos(β2 − β1 ) + sin(β2 − β1 ) · tan(y) > 0.
Recall that β1 − β2 ≡ b1 and b1 ∈ (0, π), and thus sin(β2 − β1 ) < 0. Hence, the above inequality is
equivalent to
cos(β2 − β1 ) − cos(α2 − α1 ) + sin(α2 − α1 ) · tan(x)
.
(7)
tan(y) <
sin(β2 − β1 )
Therefore, we obtained that w2 > 0 if and only if Inequality (7) holds.
Similarly, for w3 , we can obtain that w3 > 0 if and only if the following inequality holds:
tan(y) >
cos(β3 − β1 ) − cos(α3 − α1 ) + sin(α3 − α1 ) · tan(x)
.
sin(β3 − β1 )
25
(8)
Note that to obtain Inequality (8), we need to use the fact that sin(β3 − β1 ) > 0, which is due to
β3 − β1 ≡ b3 and b3 ∈ (0, π).
As a summary, the above shows that w1 = 0 and wi > 0 for i = 2, 3 if and only if both Inequalities
(7) and (8) hold. Recall that since cos(x) > 0, y is in (π/2, 3π/2). Further, note that we can find an
angle y ∈ (π/2, 3π/2) such that both (7) and (8) hold if and only if the right side of Inequality (7) is
strictly larger than the right side of Inequality (8). Hence, we obtain the following observation.
Observation 4 For the case cos(x) > 0, there exist y and τ ≥ 0 such that w1 = 0 and wi > 0 for
i = 2, 3 if and only if the right side of Inequality (7) is strictly larger than the right side of Inequality
(8), which is equivalent to the following inequality:
δ · tan(x) < δ1 − δ2 ,
(9)
where δ, δ1 , and δ2 are defined as in the statement of Lemma 11.
Proof: Recall that
δ=
δ1 =
sin(α3 − α1 ) sin(α2 − α1 )
−
,
sin(β3 − β1 )
sin(β2 − β1 )
cos(β3 − β1 ) − cos(α3 − α1 )
cos(β2 − β1 ) − cos(α2 − α1 )
, and δ2 =
.
sin(β2 − β1 )
sin(β3 − β1 )
That the right side of Inequality (7) is larger than the right side of Inequality (8) is equivalent to
the following
cos(β2 − β1 ) − cos(α2 − α1 ) cos(β3 − β1 ) − cos(α3 − α1 )
sin(α3 − α1 ) · tan(x) sin(α2 − α1 ) · tan(x)
−
<
−
,
sin(β3 − β1 )
sin(β2 − β1 )
sin(β2 − β1 )
sin(β3 − β1 )
which is further equivalent to Inequality (9).
Recall that cos(x) > 0. Thus, x ∈ (−π/2, π/2).
2
If δ > 0, Inequality (9) is equivalent to tan(x) < δ1 −δ
δ . Consequently, since x ∈ (−π/2, π/2), we
δ1 −δ2
obtain that x ∈ (−π/2, arctan( δ )).
δ1 −δ2
2
If δ < 0, Inequality (9) is equivalent to tan(x) > δ1 −δ
δ , implying that x ∈ (arctan( δ ), π/2).
If δ = 0, Inequality (9) is equivalent to 0 < δ1 − δ2 . Hence, if δ1 > δ2 , then any x can make the
inequality hold, implying that x ∈ (−π/2, π/2); otherwise, no x can make it hold.
In summary, for the case cos(x) > 0, there exist y and τ ≥ 0 such that w1 = 0 and wi > 0 for
δ1 −δ2
2
i = 2, 3 if and only if: x ∈ (−π/2, arctan( δ1 −δ
δ )) when δ > 0; x ∈ (arctan( δ ), π/2) when δ < 0;
x ∈ (−π/2, π/2) when δ = 0 and δ1 > δ2 .
The case cos(x) < 0. In this case, x ∈ (π/2, 3π/2). The analysis is similar to the above case. We
omit the details and only give the result below.
2
There exist y and τ ≥ 0 such that w1 = 0 and wi > 0 for i = 2, 3 if and only if: x ∈ (arctan( δ1 −δ
δ )+
2
π, 3π/2) when δ > 0; x ∈ (π/2, arctan( δ1 −δ
δ )+π) when δ < 0; x ∈ (π/2, 3π/2) when δ = 0 and δ1 < δ2 .
The case cos(x) = 0. In this case x = ±π/2. The analysis for this case is different from the above
two cases. We will show the following result: There exist y and τ ≥ 0 such that w1 = 0 and wi > 0 for
i = 2, 3 if and only if: x = −π/2 when δ > 0; x = π/2 when δ < 0 (there is no value for x when δ = 0).
By Lemma 13, there exist y and τ ≥ 0 such that w1 = 0 and wi > 0 for i = 2, 3 if and only
there exist y and τ ≥ 0 such that wi > 0 for i = 1, 2, 3. For convenience, in this case, we will find all
directions rs such that there exist y and τ ≥ 0 with wi > 0 for i = 1, 2, 3.
26
Since cos(x) = 0, we have w1 = τ · cos(y). Since we require w1 > 0, τ cannot be 0 and thus τ > 0
w1
must hold. Therefore, we have cos(y) > 0 and y ∈ (−π/2, π/2). In addition, τ = cos(y)
. By replacing
w1
τ with cos(y) and setting cos(x) to 0 in Equation (6) for w2 , we obtain the following
w2 = cos(α2 − α1 ) · cos(x) − sin(α2 − α1 ) · sin(x)
w1
· cos(β2 − β1 ) · cos(y) − sin(β2 − β1 ) · sin(y)
+
cos(y)
= − sin(α2 − α1 ) · sin(x) + cos(β2 − β1 ) · w1 − sin(β2 − β1 ) · tan(y) · w1 .
Hence, w2 > 0 if and only if the following holds
sin(β2 − β1 ) · tan(y) · w1 < − sin(α2 − α1 ) · sin(x) + cos(β2 − β1 ) · w1 .
Recall that since β1 − β2 = b1 and b1 ∈ (0, π), sin(β2 − β1 ) < 0. Since w1 > 0, the above inequality
is equivalent to the following
tan(y) >
− sin(α2 − α1 ) · sin(x) + cos(β2 − β1 ) · w1
sin(β2 − β1 ) · w1
(10)
For w3 , by the similar analysis (we also need to use the fact that sin(β3 − β1 ) > 0), w3 > 0 if and
only if the following holds
tan(y) <
− sin(α3 − α1 ) · sin(x) + cos(β3 − β1 ) · w1
sin(β3 − β1 ) · w1
(11)
Based on the above discussion, wi > 0 for i = 1, 2, 3 if and only if we can find y ∈ (−π/2, π/2) such
that both Inequalities (10) and (11) hold. It is not difficult to see that we can find y ∈ (−π/2, π/2)
such that both Inequalities (10) and (11) hold if and only if the right side of Inequality (10) is strictly
less than the right side of Inequality (11), i.e.,
− sin(α3 − α1 ) · sin(x) + cos(β3 − β1 ) · w1
− sin(α2 − α1 ) · sin(x) + cos(β2 − β1 ) · w1
<
.
sin(β2 − β1 ) · w1
sin(β3 − β1 ) · w1
(12)
Since w1 > 0, we have the following observation.
Observation 5 wi > 0 for i = 1, 2, 3 if and only if there exits w1 > 0 such that
h
i
δ · sin(x) < w1 · cot(β3 − β1 ) − cot(β2 − β1 ) .
Proof: The left side of Inequality (12) is equal to cot(β2 − β1 ) −
is equal to cot(β3 − β1 ) −
sin(α3 −α1 )
sin(β3 −β1 )
·
sin(x)
w1 .
sin(α2 −α1 )
sin(β2 −β1 )
·
sin(x)
w1
and the right side
Hence, Inequality (12) is equivalent to the following
sin(x) h sin(α3 − α1 ) sin(α2 − α1 ) i
< cot(β3 − β1 ) − cot(β2 − β1 ).
·
−
w1
sin(β3 − β1 )
sin(β2 − β1 )
sin(α2 −α1 )
3 −α1 )
Recall that δ = sin(α
sin(β3 −β1 ) − sin(β2 −β1 ) . Since w1 > 0, the observation is obtained.
We also have the following observation.
Lemma 14. It holds that cot(β3 − β1 ) − cot(β2 − β1 ) < 0.
27
Proof: Note that β3 − β1 ≡ b3 and β2 − β1 ≡ b3 + b2 . Hence, to prove the lemma, it is sufficient to
prove cot(b3 ) < cot(b3 + b2 ).
Recall that bi is in (0, π) for each i = 1, 2, 3. Since b1 + b2 + b3 = 2π, it holds that b3 + b2 ∈ (π, 2π).
Note that cot(b3 ) = cot(b3 + π). Due to b3 ∈ (0, π), b3 + π ∈ (π, 2π). Hence, both b3 + b2 and b3 + π
are in (π, 2π). Since b2 ∈ (0, π), b3 + b2 < b3 + π. Because cot(·) is a strictly decreasing function on
(π, 2π), we obtain cot(b3 + b2 ) > cot(b3 + π) = cot(b3 ), which proves the lemma.
Recall that x is either π/2 or −π/2.
In light of Lemma 14, if δ > 0, then there exists w1 > 0 such that the inequality in Observation 5
is satisfied if and only if sin(x) < 0, i.e., x = −π/2. Therefore, if δ > 0, by Observation 5, wi > 0 for
i = 1, 2, 3 if and only if x = −π/2.
Similarly, we can obtain that if δ < 0, then wi > 0 for i = 1, 2, 3 if and only if x = π/2.
If δ = 0, then for any x and any w1 > 0, the inequality in Observation 5 can never be satisfied.
Therefore, for any x, it is not possible to have wi < 0 for all i = 1, 2, 3.
A summary of all three cases. Let R(x) be the set of values for x such that there exist y and
τ ≥ 0 with wi > 0 for i = 1, 2, 3. In other words, since x = α1 − θt , R(s) = {α1 − θt | θt ∈ Rπ (s, t)}. By
our discussions for all three cases cos(x) > 0, cos(x) < 0, and cos(x) = 0, we can obtain the following:
If δ > 0, we have
δ1 −δ2
for cos(x) > 0,
(−π/2, arctan( δ ))
δ1 −δ2
2
R(x) = (arctan( δ1 −δ
δ ) + π, 3π/2) = (arctan( δ ) − π, −π/2) for cos(x) < 0,
{−π/2}
for cos(x) = 0.
Therefore, if δ > 0, R(x) is the union of the above three
2
π, arctan( δ1 −δ
δ )).
Similarly, if δ < 0, we have
δ1 −δ2
for
(arctan( δ ), π/2)
2
R(x) = (π/2, arctan( δ1 −δ
δ ) + π) for
{π/2}
for
2
intervals, which is (arctan( δ1 −δ
δ ) −
cos(x) > 0,
cos(x) < 0,
cos(x) = 0.
δ1 −δ2
2
Therefore, if δ < 0, R(x) = (arctan( δ1 −δ
δ ), arctan( δ ) + π).
Finally, if δ = 0, depending on the values of δ1 and δ2 , there are three
(−π/2, π/2). If δ1 < δ2 , R(x) = (π/2, 3π/2). If δ1 = δ2 , R(x) = ∅.
As a summary, we obtain the following
δ1 −δ2
2
(arctan( δ1 −δ
δ ) − π, arctan( δ )) if δ > 0,
δ1 −δ2
δ1 −δ2
(arctan( δ ), arctan( δ ) + π) if δ < 0,
R(x) = (−π/2, π/2)
if δ = 0 and
(π/2, 3π/2)
if δ = 0 and
∅
if δ = 0 and
cases. If δ1 > δ2 , R(x) =
δ1 > δ2 ,
δ1 < δ2 ,
δ1 = δ2 ,
Since R(s) = {α1 − θt | θt ∈ Rπ (s, t)}, we obtain the range Rπ (s, t) for θs as follows.
δ1 −δ2
2
(α1 − arctan( δ1 −δ
δ ), α1 − arctan( δ ) + π) if δ > 0,
δ1 −δ2
δ1 −δ2
(α1 − arctan( δ ) − π, α1 − arctan( δ )) if δ < 0,
Rπ (s, t) = (α1 − π/2, α1 + π/2)
if δ = 0 and δ1 > δ2 ,
(α1 − 3π/2, α1 − π/2)
if δ = 0 and δ1 < δ2 ,
∅
if δ = 0 and δ1 = δ2 ,
28
To prove Lemma 11, it remains to show that δ = 0 and δ1 = δ2 if and only if ai = bi for each
i = 1, 2, 3. To this end, we first give the following lemma.
Lemma 15. If δ = 0 and δ1 = δ2 , then δ1 = δ2 = 0.
Proof: Recall that
sin(α3 − α1 ) sin(α2 − α1 )
−
,
sin(β3 − β1 )
sin(β2 − β1 )
cos(β2 − β1 ) − cos(α2 − α1 )
cos(β3 − β1 ) − cos(α3 − α1 )
δ1 =
, and δ2 =
.
sin(β2 − β1 )
sin(β3 − β1 )
δ=
For the purpose of differentiation, we use δ(1, 2, 3), δ1 (1, 2, 3), and δ2 (1, 2, 3) to represent the above
δ, δ1 , and δ2 , respectively. We use (1, 2, 3) because our previous discussion considered d′ui ,vi (s, t) in the
order of 1, 2, 3.
Suppose δ(1, 2, 3) = 0 and δ1 (1, 2, 3) = δ2 (1, 2, 3). In the following, we give an “indirect” approach
to prove δ1 (1, 2, 3) = δ2 (1, 2, 3) = 0.
Our previous discussion has proved that Rπ (s, t) = ∅ if and only δ(1, 2, 3) = 0 and δ1 (1, 2, 3) =
δ2 (1, 2, 3). In other words, there is no value for θs such that there exist θt and τ ≥ 0 with wi > 0 for
i = 1, 2, 3 if and only if δ(1, 2, 3) = 0 and δ1 (1, 2, 3) = δ2 (1, 2, 3).
Our previous analysis considered the three functions wi in the order of 1, 2, 3. If we consider them
in the order of 2, 3, 1, by using the same analysis, we can obtain that Rπ (s, t) = ∅ if and only if
δ(2, 3, 1) = 0 and δ1 (2, 3, 1) = δ2 (2, 3, 1), where
δ(2, 3, 1) =
sin(α1 − α2 ) sin(α3 − α2 )
−
,
sin(β1 − β2 )
sin(β3 − β2 )
cos(β3 − β2 ) − cos(α3 − α2 )
cos(β1 − β2 ) − cos(α1 − α2 )
, and δ2 (2, 3, 1) =
.
sin(β3 − β2 )
sin(β1 − β2 )
Another way to think about this is that we can replace 1, 2, 3 by 2, 3, 1, respectively, in δ(1, 2, 3),
δ1 (1, 2, 3), and δ2 (1, 2, 3). The main reason why the same analysis as before still works is that if we
follow the order of 2, 3, 1, the vertices of u2 , u3 , u1 are still in the counterclockwise order around s and
the vertices of v2 , v3 , v1 are still in the clockwise order around t. We omit the detailed analysis.
Similarly, if we consider the three functions wi in the order of 3, 1, 2, by using the same analysis,
we can obtain that Rπ (s, t) = ∅ if and only if δ(3, 1, 2) = 0 and δ2 (3, 1, 2) = δ3 (3, 1, 2), where
δ1 (2, 3, 1) =
δ(3, 1, 2) =
sin(α2 − α3 ) sin(α1 − α3 )
−
,
sin(β2 − β3 )
sin(β1 − β3 )
cos(β2 − β3 ) − cos(α2 − α3 )
cos(β1 − β3 ) − cos(α1 − α3 )
, and δ2 (3, 1, 2) =
.
sin(β1 − β3 )
sin(β2 − β3 )
Recall that δ(1, 2, 3) = 0 and δ1 (1, 2, 3) = δ2 (1, 2, 3). Thus, Rπ (s, t) = ∅. According to the above
discussion, δ(2, 3, 1) = 0 and δ1 (2, 3, 1) = δ2 (2, 3, 1), and δ(3, 1, 2) = 0 and δ2 (3, 1, 2) = δ3 (3, 1, 2). In the
following, we show that δ1 (1, 2, 3) = δ2 (1, 2, 3) = δ1 (2, 3, 1) = δ2 (2, 3, 1) = δ2 (3, 1, 2) = δ3 (3, 1, 2) = 0,
which will prove the lemma.
First of all, δ2 (1, 2, 3) = −δ1 (3, 1, 2) holds because cos(β3 − β1 ) = cos(β1 − β3 ), cos(α3 − α1 ) =
cos(α1 − α3 ), and sin(β3 − β1 ) = − sin(β1 − β3 ).
Similarly, we can obtain δ1 (2, 3, 1) = −δ2 (3, 1, 2) and δ1 (1, 2, 3) = −δ2 (2, 3, 1).
Due to δ2 (1, 2, 3) = −δ1 (3, 1, 2) and δ1 (2, 3, 1) = −δ2 (3, 1, 2), we derive δ1 (1, 2, 3) = δ2 (1, 2, 3) =
−δ1 (3, 1, 2) = −δ2 (3, 1, 2) = δ1 (2, 3, 1) = δ2 (2, 3, 1). In particular, we have δ1 (1, 2, 3) = δ2 (2, 3, 1).
The above has obtained that both δ1 (1, 2, 3) = −δ2 (2, 3, 1) and δ1 (1, 2, 3) = δ2 (2, 3, 1) hold, implying that δ1 (1, 2, 3) = δ2 (2, 3, 1) = 0. Consequently, δ1 (1, 2, 3) = δ2 (1, 2, 3) = δ1 (2, 3, 1) = δ2 (2, 3, 1) =
δ2 (3, 1, 2) = δ3 (3, 1, 2) = 0.
The lemma thus follows.
δ1 (3, 1, 2) =
29
Lemma 16. δ = 0 and δ1 = δ2 if and only if ai = bi for each i = 1, 2, 3.
Proof: Recall that a1 ≡ α2 − α1 , a2 ≡ α3 − α2 , a3 ≡ α1 − α3 , b1 ≡ β1 − β2 , b2 ≡ β2 − β3 , and
b3 ≡ β3 − β1 . We first prove one direction of the lemma. Suppose ai = bi for each i = 1, 2, 3. Then,
δ=
− sin(a3 )
sin(a1 )
sin(α3 − α1 ) sin(α2 − α1 )
−
=
−
= 0.
sin(β3 − β1 )
sin(β2 − β1 )
sin(b3 )
− sin(b1 )
Also, we have cos(β2 − β1 ) = cos(b1 ) and cos(α2 − α1 ) = cos(a1 ). Since a1 = b1 , we obtain δ1 = 0.
Similarly, we have cos(β3 − β1 ) = cos(b3 ) and cos(α3 − α1 ) = cos(a3 ). Since a3 = b3 , we obtain δ2 = 0.
This proves that δ = 0 and δ1 = δ2 .
Next we prove the other direction of the lemma. Suppose δ = 0 and δ1 = δ2 . In the following we
prove ai = bi for i = 1, 2, 3. By Lemma 15, we know that δ1 = δ2 = 0.
Since δ1 = 0, it holds that cos(β2 − β1 ) = cos(α2 − α1 ), i.e., cos(b1 ) = cos(a1 ).
Similarly, since δ2 = 0, it holds that cos(β3 − β1 ) = cos(α3 − α1 ), i.e., cos(b3 ) = cos(a3 ).
sin(a1 )
3)
On the other hand, δ = 0 implies that sin(a
sin(b3 ) = sin(b1 ) .
Note that b1 + b2 + b3 = 2π. Recall that two or even all three of u1 , u2 , u3 may be the same.
According to our definitions of the three angles a1 , a2 , a3 , if u1 = u2 = u3 , then a1 = a2 = a3 = 0;
otherwise, a1 + a2 + a3 = 2π although one of the three angles may still be zero. In either case, it holds
that a1 + a2 + a3 ≤ 2π.
In the sequel, we first prove a1 = b1 and a3 = b3 .
Note that bi ∈ (0, π) for each i = 1, 2, 3, and ai ∈ [0, 2π) for each i = 1, 2, 3.
Assume to the contrary that b1 6= a1 and b3 6= a3 . Due to cos(b1 ) = cos(a1 ), it must be that
a1 = 2π − b1 . Since b1 ∈ (0, π), we obtain a1 ∈ (π, 2π). Similarly, due to cos(b3 ) = cos(a3 ), it must be
that a3 = 2π − b3 . Since b3 ∈ (0, π), we obtain a3 ∈ (π, 2π). This yields that a1 + a3 > 2π, contradicting
with a1 + a2 + a3 ≤ 2π.
Therefore, at least one of b1 6= a1 and b3 6= a3 must be true. Without loss of generality, we assume
b1 = a 1 .
sin(a1 )
3)
Since sin(a
sin(b3 ) = sin(b1 ) and b1 = a1 , it is obviously true that sin(a3 ) = sin(b3 ). Recall that we
already have cos(a3 ) = cos(b3 ). Therefore, it must hold that a3 = b3 mod 2π. Since ai ∈ [0, 2π) and
b3 ∈ (0, π), we obtain that a3 = b3 .
This proves that a1 = b1 and a3 = b3 . Since neither b1 nor b3 is zero, we obtain a1 6= 0 and a3 6= 0,
and thus a1 + a2 + a3 = 2π. This implies that a2 = b2 since b1 + b2 + b3 = 2π. The lemma thus follows.
5
Computing the Candidate Points
In this section, with the help of the observations in Sections 3 and 4, we compute a set S of candidate
points such that all geodesic centers must be in S.
Let s be any geodesic center. Recall that F (s) is the set of all farthest points of s. Depending on
whether s is in V, E, or I, the size |F (s)|, whether some points of F (s) are in V, E, or I, whether s
has a degenerate farthest point, there are a significant (but still constant) number of cases. For each
case, our algorithm uses an exhaustive-search approach to compute a set of candidate points such
that s must be in the set. In particular, there are four cases, called dominating cases, for which the
number of candidate points is O(n11 ). But the total number of the candidate points for all other cases
is only O(n10 ). Therefore, the set S has a total of O(n11 ) candidate points. We will show that S can
be computed in O(n11 log n) time.
To find the geodesic centers in S, a straightforward algorithm works as follows. For each point
ŝ ∈ S, we can compute dmax (ŝ) in O(n log n) time by first computing the shortest path map SPM (ŝ)
of ŝ in O(n log n) time [12] and then obtaining the maximum geodesic distance from ŝ to all vertices
30
of SPM (ŝ). Since all geodesic centers are in S, the points of S with the smallest dmax (ŝ) are geodesic
centers of P.
Since |S| = O(n11 ), the above algorithm runs in O(n12 log n) time. Let Sd denote the set of the
candidate points for the four dominating cases. Clearly, the bottleneck is on finding the geodesic centers
from Sd . To improve the algorithm, when we compute the candidate points of Sd , we will maintain
the corresponding path information. By using these path information and based on new observations,
we will present in Section 6 an O(n11 log n) time “pruning algorithm” that can eliminate most of
the points from Sd such that none of the eliminated points is a geodesic center and the number of
remaining points in Sd is only O(n10 ). Consequently, we can use the above straightforward algorithm
to find all geodesic centers in O(n11 log n) time.
In the rest of this section, we focus on computing the set S. Our algorithm for finding the geodesic
centers from S (in particular, the pruning algorithm) will be given in Section 6.
In the following, we adopt the follow convention on notation: s represents a true geodesic center
and ŝ represents a corresponding candidate point.
First of all, for the case s ∈ V, we consider all polygon vertices of V as candidate points. In the
following, we only consider the case s ∈ E or s ∈ I. If s has a degenerate farthest point, we refer to
it as the degenerate case; otherwise it is a non-degenerate or general case. We will compute candidate
points for the general case and the degenerate case in Sections 5.2 and 5.3, respectively. The four
dominating cases are all general cases. We begin with computing the candidate points for a special
case in Section 5.1.
5.1
A Special Case
Consider a non-degenerate farthest point t of s such that t is in E or I. If t is in E, then there are
exactly two shortest s-t paths; we say that t is a special farthest point of s if the π-range Rπ (s, t) of
s with respect to t and the two shortest paths is ∅ (i.e., the special case in Lemma 8). Similarly, if t
is in I, then there are exactly three shortest s-t paths; we say that t is a special farthest point of s if
the π-range Rπ (s, t) of s with respect to t and the three shortest paths is ∅ (i.e., the special case in
Lemma 11).
If s has a special farthest point, we refer to it as the special case. Let s be any geodesic center in
the special case. In this subsection, we will compute a set S1 of O(n5 ) candidate points in O(n5 log n)
time for the special case, such that s must be in S1 .
Let t be a special farthest point of s. By the above definition, t is in E or I. We discuss the two
cases below.
The case t ∈ E. Let e be the polygon edge that contains t. Let π1 (s, t) and π2 (s, t) be the two
shortest s-t paths. For each i = 1, 2, let ui and vi be the s-pivot and t-pivot of πi (s, t), respectively
(i.e., πi (s, t) = πui ,vi (s, t)). Then, we have |su1 | + d(u1 , v1 ) + |v1 t| = |su2 | + d(u2 , v2 ) + |v2 t|. We define
the angles α1 , α2 , β1 , β2 in the same way as those for Lemma 8 in Section 4.2. Since Rπ (s, t) = ∅, by
Lemma 8, β1 + β2 = π and α2 − α1 = ±π.
Note that α2 − α1 = ±π implies that s is on the line segment u1 u2 . β1 + β2 = π implies that lt
bisects the angle ∠v1 tv2 , where lt is the line through t and perpendicular to e.
In summary, s and t satisfy the following “constraints”: (1) t ∈ e; (2) |su1 | + d(u1 , v1 ) + |v1 t| =
|su2 | + d(u2 , v2 ) + |v2 t|; (3) s ∈ u1 u2 ; (4) lt bisects the angle ∠v1 tv2 .
If we consider the coordinates of s and t as four variables, the above four (independent) constraints
can determine s and t. An easy observation is that s must be in a bisector edge of two cells of SPM (t)
whose roots are u1 and u2 , respectively (in fact s is the intersection of the bisector edge and u1 u2 ).
Correspondingly, we compute the candidate points in an exhaustive way as follows.
We enumerate all possible combinations of a polygon edge as e and two polygon vertices as v1 and
v2 . For each combination, we find a point t on e such that the above condition (4) can be satisfied.
31
Next we compute the shortest path map SPM (t) of t. For each bisector edge of SPM (t), we consider it
as e and let u1 and u2 be the roots of the two cells of SPM (t) incident to e; we report the intersection
e ∩ u1 u2 (if any) as a candidate point ŝ. In this way, we can compute at most O(n) candidate points
on SPM (t) since the combinatorial complexity of SPM (t) is O(n). Thus, for each combination of e, v1 ,
and v2 , we can compute O(n) candidate points. Since there are O(n3 ) combinations, we can compute
O(n4 ) candidate points and we add these points to S1 . By our above discussions, the geodesic center
s must be in S1 .
Since computing a shortest path map takes O(n log n) time [12], the running time of the above
algorithm is bounded by O(n4 log n).
The case t ∈ I. In this case, there are exactly three shortest s-t paths: πi (s, t) = πui ,vi (s, t) with
i = 1, 2, 3. Then we have |su1 | + d(u1 , v1 ) + |v1 t| = |su2 | + d(u2 , v2 ) + |v2 t| = |su3 | + d(u3 , v3 ) + |v3 t|.
We define the angles ai , bi , for i = 1, 2, 3, in the same way as those for Lemma 11 in Section 4.4. By
Lemma 11, ai = bi for i = 1, 2, 3.
If we consider the coordinates of s and t as four variables, the above equation on the lengths of
the three shortest paths provide two constraints and the identities of the three pairs of angles provide
other two (independent) constraints, and thus the total four (independent) constraints can determine
s and t. Correspondingly, we compute the candidate points for s as follows.
We enumerate all possible combinations of three polygon vertices as v1 , v2 , v3 . We compute the
shortest path maps of v1 , v2 , and v3 in O(n log n) time. Next we compute the overlay of the three
shortest path maps. The overlay is of size O(n2 ) and can compute in O(n2 log n) time [3,7]. Then,
for each cell of the overlay, we obtain the three roots of the cell in the three shortest path maps
and consider them as u1 , u2 , u2 . Finally, we use the above four constraints to determine a constant
number of pairs (ŝ, t) (we assume this can be done in constant time since the angles ai and bi can be
parameterized by the coordinates of ŝ and t), and we add each ŝ to S1 as a candidate point. In this
way, for each combination of v1 , v2 , v3 , we can compute O(n2 ) candidate points in O(n2 log n) time.
Since there are O(n3 ) combinations, we can compute O(n5 ) candidate points in O(n5 log n) time.
5.2
The General Case
Recall that in the general case s does not have a degenerate farthest point. Depending on whether s
is in I or in E, there are two main cases. We first consider the case s ∈ I.
The case s ∈ I. Depending on whether |F (s)| is 1, 2, or at least 3, there are further three cases.
The case |F (s)| = 1. If |F (s)| = 1, let t be the only farthest point of s. Thus, R(s) = R(s, t). By
Lemma 1, R(s) = ∅. Hence, R(s, t) = ∅. Since s ∈ I, by our observations in Section 4 (in particular,
Lemmas 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12), t is either in E or I, and in either case Rπ (s, t) = ∅ since s ∈ I and Rf (s)
consists of all directions. Hence, t must be a special farthest point of s, which implies that s has been
computed in the candidate point set S1 .
The case |F (s)| = 2. If |F (s)| = 2, we assume that F (s) does not have any special farthest points
since otherwise s would have already been computed in S1 . Let F (s) = {t1 , t2 }. Depending on whether
each of t1 and t2 is in V, E, or I, there are several cases. In the following, we use (x, y, z) to refer to
the case where x, y, z points of F (s) are in I, E, and V, respectively, with x + y + z = 2. For example,
(1, 1, 0) refers to the case where one point of F (x) is in I and the other is in E.
1. Case (2, 0, 0). We first consider the most general case where ti ∈ I for i = 1, 2. Other cases are
very similar. For each i = 1, 2, since ti ∈ I, ti has three shortest paths to s: πuij ,vij (s, ti ) with
32
j = 1, 2, 3. Hence, we have the following
|t1 v11 | + d(v11 , u11 ) + |u11 s| = |t1 v12 | + d(v12 , u12 ) + |u12 s| = |t1 v13 | + d(v13 , u13 ) + |u13 s|
=|t2 v21 | + d(v21 , u21 ) + |u21 s| = |t2 v22 | + d(v22 , u22 ) + |u22 s| = |t2 v23 | + d(v23 , u23 ) + |u23 s|.
Further, since s has only two farthest points and s ∈ I, it must hold that R(s) = Rπ (s, t1 ) ∩
Rπ (s, t2 ) = ∅ by Lemma 1. Recall that we have assumed that F (s) does not have any special
farthest points. Therefore, neither Rπ (s, t1 ) nor Rπ (s, t2 ) is ∅. By Lemma 11, each of Rπ (s, t1 ) and
Rπ (s, t2 ) is an open range of size π. For each i = 1, 2, the directions of Rπ (s, ti ) are delimited by an
open half-plane whose bounding line contains s, and we refer to the bounding line as the bounding
line of the range Rπ (s, ti ). Since Rπ (s, t1 ) ∩ Rπ (s, t2 ) = ∅, we can obtain that the bounding line of
Rπ (s, t1 ) is the same as that of Rπ (s, t2 ).
If we consider the coordinates of s, t1 , and t2 as six variables, the above system of equations on the
distances of the six shortest paths provide five constraints and that the bounding lines of the two
π-ranges overlap provides another constraint (note that the bounding lines of the two π-range can
be parameterized by the coordinates of s, t1 , and t2 ). Hence, the six (independent) constraints can
determine the triple (s, t1 , t2 ). Correspondingly, our algorithm for computing the candidate points
works as follows.
We enumerate all possible combinations of six polygon vertices as vij for i = 1, 2 and j = 1, 2, 3.
We compute overlay of the shortest path maps of the six vertices. For each cell of the overlay, we
obtain the six roots in the six shortest path maps as uij for i = 1, 2 and j = 1, 2, 3. Using the six
constraints as discussed above, we can obtain a constant number of triples (ŝ, t1 , t2 ), and each such
ŝ is a candidate point.
In this way, for each combination, we can compute O(n2 ) candidate points in O(n2 log n) time.
Since there are O(n6 ) combinations, we can compute O(n8 ) candidate points in overall O(n8 log n)
time. As analyzed above, s must be one of these candidate points.
2. Case (1, 1, 0). In this case, one of t1 and t2 is in I and the other is in E. Without loss of generality,
we assume t1 ∈ I and t2 ∈ E. Hence, t1 has three shortest paths to s: πu1j ,v1j (s, t1 ) for j = 1, 2, 3,
and t2 has two shortest paths to s: πu2j ,v2j (s, t2 ) for j = 1, 2. Hence, we have the following
|t1 v11 | + d(v11 , u11 ) + |u11 s| = |t1 v12 | + d(v12 , u12 ) + |u12 s| = |t1 v13 | + d(v13 , u13 ) + |u13 s|
=|t2 v21 | + d(v21 , u21 ) + |u21 s| = |t2 v22 | + d(v22 , u22 ) + |u22 s|.
As in the previous case, Rπ (s, t1 )∩ Rπ (s, t2 ) = ∅ and each of the two π-ranges is nonempty; further,
and the two bounding lines of these two π-ranges must overlap.
Let e be the polygon edge that contains t.
The above equations provide four constraints and the overlap of the two bounding lines of the
two π-ranges provides another constraint. In addition, t2 ∈ e gives the sixth constraint. As in the
previous case, the six constraints can determine s, t1 , and t2 if we consider their coordinates as six
variables. Correspondingly, we compute candidate points as follows.
We enumerate all possible combinations of a polygon edge as e and five polygon vertices as
v11 , v12 , v13 , v21 , v22 . We compute the overlay of the shortest path maps of the five vertices. For each
cell of the overlay, we obtain the five roots in the five shortest path maps as u11 , u12 , u13 , u21 , u22 .
Then we obtain the equations as above. Along with the constraint that t2 ∈ e and the constraint
that the two bounding lines of the π-ranges Rπ (ŝ, t1 ) and Rπ (ŝ, t2 ) overlap, we can obtain a constant
number of triples (ŝ, t1 , t2 ), and each such ŝ is a candidate point. In this way, for each combination,
we can compute O(n2 ) candidate points in O(n2 log n) time. Since there are O(n8 ) combinations,
we can compute O(n8 ) candidate points for s in O(n8 log n) time.
3. Other Cases. The other cases are all very similar (i.e., (1, 0, 1), (0, 2, 0), (0, 1, 1), (0, 0, 2)), and we
can compute a total of O(n8 ) candidate points in O(n8 log n) time. We omit the details.
As a summary, for the case |F (s)| = 2, we can compute at most O(n8 ) candidate centers in
O(n8 log n) time.
33
The case |F (s)| ≥ 3. In this case, the geodesic center s has at least three farthest points. We assume
s does not have any special farthest points since otherwise s would have already been computed in
S1 . Hence, for each t ∈ F (s), the π-range Rπ (s, t) is not empty and thus is an open range of size π.
Together with Lemma 1, this further implies that s must have three farthest points t1 , t2 , t3 such that
Rπ (s, t1 ) ∩ Rπ (s, t2 ) ∩ Rπ (s, t3 ) = ∅. Depending on whether each of ti for i = 1, 2, 3 is in I, E, V, there
are several cases. Similarly, we use (x, y, z) to refer to the case where x, y, and z points of t1 , t2 , t3 are
in I, E, and V, respectively, with x + y + z = 3.
We begin our discussion with the most general case (3, 0, 0), where t1 , t2 , t3 are all in I. This is
one of the four dominating cases and we will need to compute O(n11 ) candidate points. Further, our
algorithm is slightly different from the previous cases in the following sense: First, in addition to the
candidate points, we will also maintain the corresponding path information; second, when computing
the candidate points, we will have a “validation procedure”. Recall that Sd is the set of candidate
points for all four dominating cases. The path information will be used in the next section to quickly
prune most of the points in Sd and the validation procedure can be considered as a “preliminary
pruning step”. The details are given below.
For each i = 1, 2, 3, since ti is in I, there are exactly three shortest paths from s to ti : πuij ,vij (s, t)
with j = 1, 2, 3. Hence, we have the following
|t1 v11 | + d(v11 , u11 ) + |u11 s| = |t1 v12 | + d(v12 , u12 ) + |u12 s| = |t1 v13 | + d(v13 , u13 ) + |u13 s|
=|t2 v21 | + d(v21 , u21 ) + |u21 s| = |t2 v22 | + d(v22 , u22 ) + |u22 s| = |t2 v23 | + d(v23 , u23 ) + |u23 s|
=|t3 v31 | + d(v31 , u31 ) + |u31 s| = |t3 v32 | + d(v32 , u32 ) + |u32 s| = |t3 v33 | + d(v33 , u33 ) + |u33 s|.
If we consider the coordinates of s, t1 , t2 , and t3 as eight variables, the above equations on the
lengths of nine paths provide eight constraints, which are sufficient to determine all four points.
Correspondingly, we compute the candidate points as follows.
We enumerate all possible combinations of nine polygon vertices as vi1 , vi2 , vi3 , with i = 1, 2, 3. For
each combination, we compute the overlay of the shortest path maps of these nine vertices. The size of
the overlay is O(n2 ). For each cell C of the overlay, we obtain nine roots of the shortest path maps and
consider them as ui1 , ui2 , ui3 for i = 1, 2, 3. We form the above system of eight equations and solve it to
obtain a constant number of quadruples of points (ŝ, t̂1 , t̂2 , t̂3 ). We also obtain a path length, denoted
by d(ŝ), which is equal to the value in the above equations, e.g., d(ŝ) = |ŝu11 | + d(u11 , v11 ) + |v11 t̂1 |.
In addition, we perform a validation procedure on each such quadruple (ŝ, t̂1 , t̂2 , t̂3 ) as follows.
First, we check whether ŝ is in C, which can be done in O(log n) time by using a point location
data structure [9,14] with O(n2 ) time and space preprocessing on the overlay. If yes, for each ti with
i = 1, 2, 3, we check whether d(ŝ) is equal to d(ŝ, t̂i ), which can be computed in O(log n) time by using
the two-point shortest path query data structure given by Chiang and Mitchell [7] with O(n11 ) time
and space preprocessing on P. If yes, we check whether vi1 , vi2 , vi3 satisfy the condition in Observation
1(1), i.e., whether t̂i is in the interior of the triangle △vi1 vi2 vi3 for each i = 1, 2, 3. If yes, for each t̂i
with i = 1, 2, 3, we check whether the order of the vertices of vi1 , vi2 , vi3 around t̂i are consistent with
the order of the vertices of ui1 , ui2 , ui3 (we say that the two orders are consistent if after reordering
the indices, vi1 , vi2 , vi3 are clockwise around t̂i while ui1 , ui2 , ui3 are counterclockwise around s; note
that this consistency is needed for determining the π-range in Lemma 11). If yes, for each t̂i with
i = 1, 2, 3, we compute the π-range Rπ (s, t̂i ) determined by Lemma 11, and then check whether
Rπ (ŝ, t̂1 ) ∩ Rπ (ŝ, t̂2 ) ∩ Rπ (ŝ, t̂3 ) is empty. If yes, we say that the quadruple (ŝ, t̂1 , t̂2 , t̂3 ) passes the
validation procedure and we call ŝ a valid candidate point and add ŝ to the set Sd . In addition, we
maintain the following path information: d(ŝ), t̂i , vij , and uij , with 1 ≤ i ≤ 3 and 1 ≤ j ≤ 3. In
fact, only d(ŝ) will be used later in the algorithm and all other information are only for the reference
purpose in the analysis.
34
In this way, for each combination of nine polygon vertices, we can compute O(n2 ) valid candidate
for Sd in O(n2 log n) time (not including the preprocessing time). Since there are O(n9 ) combinations,
we can compute a total of O(n11 ) valid candidate points for Sd in O(n11 log n) time.
Note that the geodesic center s and the quadruple (s, t1 , t2 , t3 ) discussed above must pass the
validation procedure, and thus the quadruple (s, t1 , t2 , t3 ) will be computed by our exhaustive-search
algorithm and s will be computed as a valid candidate point in Sd .
Based on our validation procedure, the following observation summarizes the properties of the valid
candidate points. These properties will be used to prove the correctness of our pruning algorithm in
Section 6.
Observation 6 Suppose (ŝ, t̂1 , t̂2 , t̂3 ) is a quadruple that passes the validation procedure, with uij and
vij , i = 1, 2, 3 and j = 1, 2, 3 defined as above. Then the following hold.
1. For each i = 1, 2, 3, ŝuij ∪ π(uij , vij ) ∪ vij t̂i is a shortest path from ŝ to t̂i for each j = 1, 2, 3.
2. For each i = 1, 2, 3, vi1 , vi2 , vi3 satisfy the condition of Observation 1(1), i.e., t̂i is in the interior
of the triangle △vi1 vi2 vi3 .
3. d(ŝ) = d(ŝ, t̂i ) for each i = 1, 2, 3.
4. Rπ (ŝ, t̂1 ) ∩ Rπ (ŝ, t̂2 ) ∩ Rπ (ŝ, t̂1 ) = ∅.
The above computes the candidate points for the case (3, 0, 0). In the following, we compute
candidate points for other cases. The algorithms are similar.
1. Case (2, 1, 0). In this case, two of t1 , t2 , t3 are in I and the third one is in E. Without loss of
generality, we assume t1 and t2 are in I and t3 is in E. Let e be the polygon edge containing t3 .
This is the second dominating case. We will also perform a validation procedure and maintain the
corresponding path information.
For each i = 1, 2, since ti is in I, there are three shortest paths from s to ti : πuij ,vij (s, t) for
j = 1, 2, 3. Since t3 ∈ E, there are two shortest paths from s to t3 : πu3j ,v3j (s, t) for j = 1, 2. Hence,
we have the following
|t1 v11 | + d(v11 , u11 ) + |u11 s| = |t1 v12 | + d(v12 , u12 ) + |u12 s| = |t1 v13 | + d(v13 , u13 ) + |u13 s|
=|t2 v21 | + d(v21 , u21 ) + |u21 s| = |t2 v22 | + d(v22 , u22 ) + |u22 s| = |t2 v23 | + d(v23 , u23 ) + |u23 s|
=|t3 v31 | + d(v31 , u31 ) + |u31 s| = |t3 v32 | + d(v32 , u32 ) + |u32 s|.
If we consider the coordinates of s, t1 , t2 , t3 as eight variables, the above equations give seven
constraints. With the additional constraint that t3 is on e, we can determine (s, t1 , t2 , t3 ). Correspondingly, we compute the candidate points as follows.
We enumerate all combinations of eight polygon vertices (as v11 , v12 , v13 , v21 , v22 , v23 , v31 , v32 ) and
one polygon edge (as e). For each combination, we can compute O(n2 ) quadruples (ŝ, t̂1 , t̂2 , t̂3 ). For
each such quadruple, we also perform the validation procedure similarly as before with the following
differences. For t̂3 , since there is no vertex v33 , we ignore all operations that involve v33 . Further,
we check whether {v11 , v12 } satisfy the condition in Observation 1(2) (instead of Observation 1(1)).
We determine the range Rπ (s, t3 ) by using Lemma 8 (instead of Lemma 11).
In this way, we can compute at most O(n11 ) valid candidate points in O(n11 log n) time and
add them to Sd , and also, we maintain the corresponding path information similarly as before.
Observation 6 still holds correspondingly with the following difference: in (1) there are only two
shortest paths for t̂3 ; in (2) for t̂3 , {v11 , v12 } satisfy the condition of Observation 1(2).
2. Cases (1, 2, 0) and (0, 3, 0). These are the other two dominating cases. We can compute O(n11 )
valid candidate points in O(n11 log n) time. The algorithms are very similar to the previous two
cases. For each case, we also need a validation procedure and keep the path information. We omit
the details.
35
We have discussed all four dominating cases. Note that the candidate points for all four dominating
cases are in I. The rest of the cases are not dominating cases. For each of the remaining cases, the
validation procedure and the path information will not be needed any more.
3. Other cases. Our algorithms for all other cases (e.g. (2, 0, 1), (1, 1, 1), (1, 0, 2), (0, 2, 1), (0, 1, 2),
(0, 0, 3)) are very similar as before (except that the validation procedure and the path information
are not needed). We can compute a total of O(n10 ) candidate points in O(n10 log n) time. We omit
the details.
As a summary for the case s ∈ I, for the four dominating cases, we have computed O(n11 ) valid
candidate points in O(n11 log n) time with the corresponding path information. For all other cases, we
have computed O(n10 ) candidate points.
The case s ∈ E. Our algorithm for computing candidate points for this case is slightly different.
Consider a geodesic center s in E. Let es denote the polygon edge that contains s. Depending on
whether |F (s)| is 1 or not, there are two cases.
The case |F (s)| = 1. If |F (s)| = 1, let t be the only farthest point of s. We assume that t is not a
special farthest point of s since otherwise s would have already been computed in S1 in Section 5.1.
Thus, by Lemma 8, the π-range Rπ (s, t) is an open range of size π. Since t is the only farthest point
of s, by Lemma 1, R(s) = R(s, t) = ∅. By Lemma 9, R(s, t) = ∅ implies that the bounding line of
the range Rπ (s, t) contains es , and this provides a constraint for determining s and t. Depending on
whether t is in I, E, or V, there are three cases.
1. The case t ∈ I. We first consider the most general case in which t ∈ I. There are three shortest
s-t paths: πui vi (s, t) for i = 1, 2, 3. Thus, we have the following
|tv1 | + d(v1 , u1 ) + |u1 s| = |tv2 | + d(v2 , u2 ) + |u2 s| = |tv3 | + d(v3 , u3 ) + |u3 s|.
If we consider the coordinates of s and t as four variables, then the above equations provide two
constraints and s ∈ es gives another constraint. In addition, that the bounding line of the range
Rπ (s, t) contains es provides the fourth constraint. Hence, the four constraints can determine s
and t. Correspondingly, we compute the candidate points as follows.
We enumerate all possible combinations of three polygon vertices as v1 , v2 , v3 . For each combination, we compute the overlay of the shortest path maps of v1 , v2 , and v3 . For each cell C of the
overlay, if it contains a portion of a polygon edge, we consider the edge as es and obtain three
roots of the shortest path maps as u1 , u2 , and u3 . Using the four constraints discussed above, we
can obtain a constant number of tuples (ŝ, t) and each such ŝ is a candidate point. In this way, we
can compute O(n5 ) candidate points in O(n5 log n) time.
2. The case t ∈ E. Let et be the polygon edge that contains t. There are two shortest s-t paths, which
gives one constraint for determining s and t. s ∈ es and t ∈ et provide two constraints. Finally,
that the bounding line of the range Rπ (s, t) contains es gives the fourth constraint. Hence, we still
have four constraints to determine s and t.
The algorithm is similar to the previous case. We can compute O(n5 ) candidate points in O(n5 log n)
time. We omit the details.
3. The case t ∈ V. In this case, t is a polygon vertex, which provides two constraints (or t is fixed
already). s ∈ es is another constraint. As before, that the bounding line of the range Rπ (s, t)
contains es provides the fourth constraint. We compute the candidate points as follows.
We enumerate all polygon vertices. For each vertex, we consider it as t and compute the shortest
path map SPM (t). For each cell C of SPM (t), if it contains a portion of polygon edge on its
boundary, then we consider that edge as es . Next, we find a candidate point ŝ on that portion of
es in C such that the π-range Rπ (ŝ, t) (determined by Lemma 8) has its bounding line contain es .
In this way, we can compute O(n2 ) candidate points in O(n2 log n) time.
36
In summary, for the case |F (s)| = 1, we compute O(n5 ) candidate points in O(n5 log n) time.
The case |F (s)| ≥ 2. Let t1 and t2 be the two farthest points of s. We assume s does not have
any special farthest points since otherwise s would have already been computed in S1 . Then, neither
Rπ (s, t1 ) nor Rπ (s, t2 ) is empty. Depending on whether each of t1 and t2 is in I, E, or V, there are
several cases.
We first consider the most general case where both t1 and t2 are in I. Other cases are very similar.
For each i = 1, 2, since ti ∈ I, there are three shortest paths from s to ti : πuij ,vij (s, t) with j = 1, 2, 3.
Hence, we have the following
|t1 v11 | + d(v11 , u11 ) + |u11 s| = |t1 v12 | + d(v12 , u12 ) + |u12 s| = |t1 v13 | + d(v13 , u13 ) + |u13 s|
=|t2 v21 | + d(v21 , u21 ) + |u21 s| = |t2 v22 | + d(v22 , u22 ) + |u22 s| = |t2 v23 | + d(v23 , u23 ) + |u23 s|.
The above equations provide five constraints for s and t. With the constraint that s ∈ es , we can
determine s, t1 , and t2 , if we consider their coordinates as six variables. Correspondingly, we compute
the candidate points as follows.
We enumerate all possible combinations of six polygon vertices as v11 , v12 , v13 , v21 , v22 , v23 . For each
combination, we compute the overlay of the shortest path maps of the six vertices. For each cell C of
the overlay, if C contains a portion of a polygon edge, then we consider the edge as es and using the
six constraints mentioned above to compute at most a constant number of triples (ŝ, t1 , t2 ). Hence, for
each combination, we can compute at most O(n2 ) candidate points in O(n2 log n) time. In this way,
we can compute O(n8 ) candidate points in O(n8 log n) time.
Candidate points for other cases can be computed similarly. We can compute O(n8 ) candidate
points in O(n8 log n) time. We omit the details.
As a summary for the case s ∈ E, we can compute a total of O(n8 ) candidate points in O(n8 log n)
time.
5.3
The Degenerate Case
In the degenerate case, the geodesic center s has at least one degenerate farthest point. Depending on
whether s is in I or E, there are two main cases.
The Case s ∈ I. Depending on whether |F (s)| is 1 or not, there are further two cases.
The case |F (s)| = 1. Let t be the only point of F (s). Then t is a degenerate farthest point of s.
Depending on whether t is in V, E, or I, there are three cases.
1. If t ∈ V, then since t is degenerate, there are at least two shortest s-t paths. Further, since t is
polygon vertex and due to our general position assumption that no two polygon vertices have more
than one shortest path, it holds that |Us (t)| ≥ 2.
If |Us (t)| ≥ 3, then s is a vertex of SPM (t). Correspondingly, we can compute candidate points as
follows. For each polygon vertex, we consider it as t and compute its shortest path map SPM (t).
Then, we report each vertex of SPM (t) as a candidate points. In this way, we can compute O(n2 )
candidate points for s in O(n2 log n) time.
If |Us (t)| = 2, let Us (t) = {u1 , u2 }. We first prove a claim: s ∈ u1 u2 .
Indeed, suppose to the contrary that the claim is not true. Then, su1 and su2 form an angle
∠u1 su2 ∈ (0, π). Consider the direction rs for moving s along the bisector of ∠v1 sv2 and towards
the interior of ∠v1 sv2 . If we move s along rs with unit speed, since ∠u1 su2 is strictly less than π
and Us (t) = {u1 , u2 }, each vertex v ∈ Ut (s) has a coupled s-pivot u ∈ Us (t) with d′u,v (s, t) < 0.
Since s ∈ I, rs is a free direction. By Lemma 4, rs is an admissible direction of s with respect
37
to t, i.e., rs ∈ R(s, t). Since R(s) = R(s, t), we obtain that R(s) is not empty, contradicting with
Lemma 1. The claim thus follows.
s ∈ u1 u2 provides a constraint for determining s (if we consider t ∈ V as fixed at a polygon vertex).
Further, there are two shortest s-t paths πui vi (s, t) with i = 1, 2. Hence, s must be in the bisector
edge that is incident to the two cells whose roots are u1 and u2 , respectively, in the shortest path
map SPM (t). Correspondingly, we compute the candidate points as follows.
We enumerate all polygon vertices. For each polygon vertex, we consider it as t and compute
SPM (t). For each bisector edge of SPM (t), we obtain the roots of the two cells incident to the
bisector edge as u1 and u2 . Then, we compute a candidate point ŝ on the bisector edge such that
ŝ ∈ u1 u2 (i.e., ŝ is the intersection of u1 u2 and the bisector edge). In this way, we can compute
O(n2 ) candidate points in O(n2 log n) time.
2. If t ∈ E, then since t is degenerate, there are at least three shortest s-t paths. Let et be the polygon
edge that contains t. Since t is a farthest point of s, t must have two vertices v1 and v2 that satisfy
the condition in Observation 1. Hence, there are two shortest s-t paths πui ,vi (s, t) for i = 1, 2.
Since s ∈ I, we claim that the π-range Rπ (s, t) with respect to the two shortest paths πui ,vi (s, t)
for i = 1, 2 must be empty. Assume to the contrary that this is not true. Then, by Lemma 5(2),
R(s, t) is not empty (in fact, Rπ (s, t) ⊆ R(s, t)). Since t is the only farthest point of s, we obtain
that R(s) = R(s, t) 6= ∅, which contradicts with Lemma 1.
Since Rπ (s, t) = ∅, one can check that s has already been computed in S1 in Section 5.1 (for the
case t ∈ E).
3. If t ∈ I, since t is degenerate, there are at most four shortest s-t paths. By Observation 1,
|Ut (s)| ≥ 3. Depending on whether |Ut (s)| = 3, there are two cases.
We first discuss the case where |Ut (s)| = 3. Let v1 , v2 , v3 be the three vertices in Ut (s). By Observation 1, t is in the interior of the triangle △v1 v2 v3 . Then, there must exist three shortest s-t
paths πui ,vi (s, t) such that no two paths cross each other, and this implies that the three paths
are canonical. Let Rπ (s, t) denote the π-range of s with respect to t and the above three shortest
paths.
If Rπ (s, t) = ∅, then one can check that s has already been computed in S1 in Section 5.1. Otherwise,
as the above second case, since s ∈ I and F (s) = {t}, by Lemma 5(1) any direction in Rπ (s, t) is
in R(s, t), implying that R(s) = R(s, t) 6= ∅, which contradicts with Lemma 1.
Next we discuss the case where |Ut (s)| > 3.
By Observation 1, t is in the interior of the convex hull of all vertices of Ut (s). If there exist
three vertices v1 , v2 , v3 of Ut (s) such that t is in the interior of △v1 v2 v3 , then we can still use
the same approach as the above case for |Ut (s)| = 3. Otherwise, there must exist four vertices
v1 , v2 , v3 , v4 ∈ Ut (s) such that t is the intersection of the two line segments v1 v2 and v3 v4 .
On the other hand, since s ∈ I and t is the only farthest point of s, we claim that |Us (t)| ≥ 2.
Indeed, suppose to the contrary that |Us (t)| = 1. Then, if we move s towards the only vertex u of
Us (t) with unit speed, then for each vertex v ∈ Ut (s), d′u,v (s, t) < 0 holds. Hence, by Lemma 2(1),
the above direction for s is in R(s, t), implying that R(s) = R(s, t) 6= ∅, which contradicts with
Lemma 1. Therefore, the claim follows.
Depending on whether |Us (t)| ≥ 3, there are two cases.
(a) If |Us (t)| ≥ 3, then s is a vertex of the shortest path map SPM (t). Correspondingly, we compute
the candidate points as follows.
We enumerate all possible combinations of four polygon vertices as vi for 1 ≤ i ≤ 4. For each
such combination, we compute the intersection of v1 v2 and v3 v4 and consider the intersection as
t. Then we compute SPM (t) and return all vertices of SPM (t) as candidate points. In this way,
for each combination, we can compute at most O(n) candidate points in O(n log n) time. Since
there are O(n4 ) combinations, we can compute a total of O(n5 ) candidate points in O(n5 log n)
time.
38
(b) If |Us (t)| = 2, let Us (t) = {u1 , u2 }. An easy observation is that s must be on the bisector edge
of u1 and u2 in SPM (t). Further, by the same analysis as before, we can show that s must be
on u1 u2 . Correspondingly, we can compute the candidate points as follows.
We enumerate all possible combinations of four polygon vertices as vi for 1 ≤ i ≤ 4. For each
such combination, we compute the intersection of v1 v2 and v3 v4 and consider the intersection
as t. Then, we compute SPM (t). For each bisector edge of SPM (t), we obtain the roots of the
two cells incident to the bisector edge as u1 and u2 , respectively. Then, we find the intersection
of u1 u2 and the bisector edge as a candidate point. Since there are O(n) bisector edges, we can
find O(n) candidate points. In this way, we can compute O(n5 ) candidate points in O(n5 log n)
time.
This finishes the case for |F (s)| = 1.
The case |F (s)| ≥ 2. Recall that s has at least one degenerate farthest point. Let t1 and t2 be any two
points of F (s) such that t1 is degenerate.
We first consider the most general case where both t1 and t2 are in I. For each i = 1, 2, ti has at
least three shortest paths from s and |Uti (s)| ≥ 3. Since t1 is degenerate, t1 has at least four shortest
paths from s. Depending on whether |Ut1 (s)| = 3, there are two cases.
If |Ut1 (s)| > 3, let v1j for 1 ≤ j ≤ 4 be any four vertices of Ut1 (s). Hence, there are four shortest
paths from s to t1 : πu1j ,v1j (s, t1 ) with 1 ≤ j ≤ 4. For t2 , let v2j for 1 ≤ j ≤ 3 be any three vertices
of Ut2 (s), and there are three shortest paths from s to t2 : πu2j ,v2j (s, t2 ) with 1 ≤ j ≤ 3. We can form
a system of equations with the lengths of the above seven shortest paths, which give six constraints
to determine (s, t1 , t2 ). Correspondingly, we can compute O(n9 ) candidate points in O(n9 log n) time.
The algorithm is similar to the previous algorithms and we omit the details.
If |Ut1 (s)| = 3, let v1j for 1 ≤ j ≤ 3 be the three vertices of Ut1 (s). Since there are at least four
shortest paths from s to t1 and due to our general position assumption that no two polygon vertices
have more than one shortest path, there exists a vertex, say v11 , in Ut1 (s) such that there are at
least two shortest paths from s to v11 . Hence, s must be on a bisector edge of the shortest path map
SPM (v11 ).
Let πu1j ,v1j (s, t1 ) for j = 1, 2, 3 be three shortest paths from s to t1 . Let πu2j ,v2j (s, t2 ) for j = 1, 2, 3
be three shortest paths from s to t2 . We can form a system of equations with the lengths of the six
paths. These equations can give five constraints, and along with that s is on a bisector edge of SPM (t1 ),
we can determine (s, t1 , t2 ) (equivalently, one may also consider that the seven shortest paths give six
constraints). Correspondingly, we compute the candidate points as follows.
We enumerate all possible combinations of six polygon vertices as vij for i = 1, 2 and j = 1, 2, 3.
For each combination, we compute the overlay of the shortest path maps of these vertices. For each
cell of the overlay, if its boundary has a portion of a bisector edge of SPM (v11 ), then based on the
above system of equations on the lengths of the six paths, we determine a constant number of triples
(ŝ, t1 , t2 ) and each such ŝ is a candidate point. Since the size of the overlay is O(n2 ), we can determine
O(n2 ) candidate points for each combination. Since there are O(n6 ) combinations, we can compute
O(n8 ) candidate points in O(n8 log n) time.
The above computes O(n9 ) candidate points for the case where both t1 and t2 are in I.
Other cases are very similar. For example, consider the case where t1 ∈ I and t2 is on a polygonal
edge e ∈ E. Comparing with the previous case, since t2 is in E, there will be one less constraint on the
equations of shortest path lengths, but t2 ∈ e gives one more constraint. All other cases are similar.
We can compute at most O(n9 ) candidate points in O(n9 log n) for all other cases. The details are
omitted.
This finishes the case for |F (s)| ≥ 2 and thus the case for s ∈ I.
The Case s ∈ E. Let es be the polygon edge that contains s. Let t be a degenerate farthest point
of s. Depending on whether t is in V, E, or I, there are three cases.
39
1. If t ∈ V, then there are at least two shortest s-t paths. Further, since t is a polygon vertex, due
to our general position assumption that any two polygon vertices have no more than one shortest
path, Us (t) has at least two vertices. This implies that s is in a bisector edge of SPM (t). Further,
as s is on es , s is at the intersection of a bisector edge of SPM (t) and es . Correspondingly, we
compute the candidate points as follows.
We consider all polygon vertices. For each vertex, we consider it as t and compute SPM (t). For
each bisector edge, if it intersects a polygon edge, we compute the intersection as a candidate point.
In this way, we can compute O(n2 ) candidate points in O(n2 log n) time.
2. If t ∈ E, let et be the polygon edge that contains t. Since t ∈ E and t is degenerate, there are at
least three shortest paths from s to t. Since t ∈ et , Ut (s) must have two vertices v1 and v2 that
satisfy the condition of Observation 1(2). Hence, |Ut (s)| ≥ 2. Depending on whether |Ut (s)| ≥ 3,
there are two cases.
(a) If |Ut (s)| ≥ 3, let vi with i = 1, 2, 3 be any three vertices of Ut (s). Then, there are three shortest
s-t paths πui ,vi (s, t) for i = 1, 2, 3. We have the following
|tv1 | + d(v1 , u1 ) + |u1 s| = |tv2 | + d(v2 , u2 ) + |u2 s| = |tv3 | + d(v3 , u3 ) + |u3 s|.
The above equations provide two constraints, and along with the constraints that s ∈ es and
t ∈ et , the four constraints can determine s and t. Correspondingly, we compute the candidate
points as follows.
We enumerate all possible combinations of three vertices as vi for i = 1, 2, 3 and a polygon edge
as et . For each combination, we compute the overlay of the shortest path maps of v1 , v2 , and
v3 . For each cell C of the overlay, if it has an edge that is a portion of a polygon edge, then we
consider the polygon edge as es and obtain the three roots of the three shortest path maps as ui
for i = 1, 2, 3. Next, using the four constraints mentioned above, we can determine a constant
number of tuples (ŝ, t) and each such ŝ is a candidate point. Since the size of the overlay is
O(n2 ), for each combination we can obtain O(n2 ) candidate points in O(n2 log n) time. Since
there are O(n4 ) combinations, we can compute O(n6 ) candidate points in O(n6 log n) time.
(b) If |Ut (s)| = 2, let v1 and v2 be the two vertices of Ut (s). Since there are at least three shortest
s-t paths and due to our general position assumption that no two polygon vertices have more
than one shortest path, one of v1 and v2 , say v1 , must have at least two shortest paths to s such
that |Us (v1 )| ≥ 2. Hence, s is on a bisector edge of SPM (v1 ). Since s ∈ es , s is the intersection
of es and a bisector edge of SPM (v1 ). Correspondingly, we can compute the candidate points
as follows.
We enumerate all polygon vertices. For each vertex, we consider it as v1 and compute its
shortest path map SPM (v1 ). Then, for each intersection between a bisector edge of SPM (v1 )
and a polygon edge, we consider it as a candidate point. Since the size of SPM (v1 ) is O(n),
there are O(n) such candidate points. In this way, we can compute at most O(n2 ) candidate
points in O(n2 log n) time.
3. If t ∈ I, then there are at least four shortest s-t paths, and |Ut (s)| ≥ 3 by Observation 1. Depending
on whether |Ut (s)| ≥ 4, there two cases.
(a) If |Ut (s)| ≥ 4, then let vi with 1 ≤ i ≤ 4 be any four vertices of Ut (s). Then, there are four
shortest s-t paths πui ,vi (s, t) for 1 ≤ i ≤ 4. We have the following
|tv1 | + d(v1 , u1 ) + |u1 s| = |tv2 | + d(v2 , u2 ) + |u2 s|
= |tv3 | + d(v3 , u3 ) + |u3 s| = |tv4 | + d(v4 , u4 ) + |u4 s|.
The above equations provide three constraints, and along with the constraints that s ∈ es ,
the four constraints can determine s and t. Correspondingly, we can compute O(n6 ) candidate
points in O(n6 log n) time. The algorithm is similar as before and we omit the details.
40
(b) If |Ut (s)| = 3, let vi with i = 1, 2, 3 be the three vertices of Ut (s). Since there are at least four
shortest s-t paths and due to our general position assumption that no two polygon vertices
have more than one shortest path, one of vi with i = 1, 2, 3, say v1 , must have at least two
shortest paths to s such that |Us (v1 )| ≥ 2. Hence, s is on a bisector edge of SPM (v1 ). Since
s ∈ es , s is the intersection of es and a bisector edge of SPM (v1 ). Correspondingly, by using the
same approach as the above case 2(b), we can compute O(n2 ) candidate points in O(n2 log n)
time.
This finishes the case for s ∈ E.
This also finishes our algorithms for computing candidate points for the degenerate case. In summary, we can compute a total of O(n9 ) candidate points in O(n9 log n) time such that s is one of these
candidate points.
6
Computing the Geodesic Centers
In this section, we find all geodesic centers from the candidate point set S. Let S ′ denote the set of
candidate points for all cases other than the four dominating cases. Recall that Sd is the set of candidate
points for the four dominating cases. Hence, S = S ′ ∪ Sd . As discussed in Section 5, |S ′ | = O(n10 ) and
we can find all geodesic centers in S ′ in O(n11 log n) time by computing their shortest path maps. In
the following, we focus on finding all geodesic centers in Sd .
We first remove all points from Sd that are also in S ′ , which can be done in O(n11 log n) time (e.g.,
by first sorting these points by their coordinates). Then, for any point s ∈ Sd , if s is a geodesic center,
s does not have any degenerate farthest point since otherwise s was also in S ′ and thus would have
already been removed from Sd .
Recall that each point s of Sd is a valid candidate point and we have maintained its path information
for s (in particular, the value d(s)).
We first perform the following duplication-cleanup procedure: for each point s ∈ Sd , if there are
many copies of s, we only keep the one with the largest value d(s) (if more than one copy has the
largest value, we keep an arbitrary one). This procedure can be done in O(n11 log n) time (e.g., by first
sorting all points of Sd by their coordinates). According to our algorithm for computing the candidate
points of Sd , we have the following observation.
Observation 7 After the duplication-cleanup procedure, for any point s ∈ Sd , if s is a geodesic center,
then dmax (s) = d(s).
Proof: For differentiation, we use Sd to denote the original set of Sd before the duplication-cleanup
procedure and use Sd′ to denote the set after the procedure. Note that Sd and Sd′ contain the same
physical points and the difference is that for each point of Sd′ , Sd may contain multiple copies of the
point, and each copy is associated with different path information. Recall that none of the point of Sd
is in S ′ .
Consider any point s ∈ Sd′ and suppose s is a geodesic center. According to our algorithm for
computing candidate points of Sd , there must be a copy of s in Sd for which we have maintained its
path information that includes a farthest point t of s and d(s) = d(s, t) by Observation 6. Since t is
a farthest point of s, d(s, t) = dmax (s). Therefore, there exists a copy of s in Sd with d(s) = dmax (s).
Let s′ denote any other copy of s in Sd . Again, by Observation 6, d(s′ ) is equal to the shortest path
distance from s′ to a point t′ . Hence, d(s′ ) ≤ dmax (s′ ) = dmax (s) = d(s).
According to our duplication-cleanup procedure, if d(s′ ) < d(s), then the copy s′ will be removed
from Sd′ . Otherwise, either copy may be removed, but in either case, the d(·) value of the remaining
copy is always equal to dmax (s). Hence, the observation follows.
Recall that all points of Sd are in I.
41
In the following, we give a pruning algorithm that can eliminate most of the points from Sd such
that none of these eliminated points is a geodesic center and the number of remaining points of Sd
is O(n10 ). Our pruning algorithm relies on the property that each candidate point s of Sd is valid.
Specifically, if s is computed for the dominating case (3, 0, 0), then s is associated with the following
path information d(s), ti , vij , and uij for 1 ≤ i ≤ 3 and 1 ≤ j ≤ 3, such that Observation 6 holds (i.e.,
s is ŝ and each ti is t̂i ). For other three dominating cases (e.g., (2, 1, 0), (1, 2, 0), and (0, 3, 0)), there
are similar properties. By using these properties, we have the following lemma.
Lemma 17. Let s be any point in Sd . If s is in the interior of a cell or an edge of Dspm, then for any
other point s′ in the interior of the same cell or edge of Dspm , it holds that dmax (s′ ) > d(s).
Proof: The proof uses similar techniques as that for Lemma 3. We only prove the case for s being a
candidate point for Case (3, 0, 0), and other cases are similar.
Recall that s is associated with the following path information d(s), ti , vij , and uij for 1 ≤ i ≤ 3
and 1 ≤ j ≤ 3, such that Observation 6 holds.
If s′ be any other point in the same cell or edge of Dspm that contains s. Hence, SPM (s) and
SPM (s′ ) are topologically equivalent. Consider any ti with 1 ≤ i ≤ 3. By Observation 6, for each
j = 1, 2, 3, πuij ,vij (s, t) is a shortest paths from s to ti . Since SPM (s) and SPM (s′ ) are topologically
equivalent, SPM (s′ ) has one and only one vertex t′i corresponding to ti and for each j = 1, 2, 3,
πuij ,vij (s′ , t′i ) is a shortest path from s′ to t′i .
Let r be the direction from s to s′ . By Observation 6, Rπ (s, t1 )∩Rπ (s, t2 )∩Rπ (s, t3 ) = ∅. Therefore,
r is not in Rπ (s, ti ) for some i with 1 ≤ i ≤ 3. Without loss of generality, we assume r is not in Rπ (s, t1 ).
Suppose we move s along the direction r with unit speed and move t1 to t′1 with speed |t1 t′1 |/|ss′ |.
Hence, when s arrives at s′ , t1 arrives at t′1 simultaneously. Since r is not in Rπ (s, t1 ), there must be a
path πu1j ,v1j (s, t1 ) for some j with 1 ≤ j ≤ 3 such that d′u1j ,v1j (s, t1 ) < 0 does not hold. Without loss
of generality, we assume j = 1. In other words, either d′u11 ,v11 (s, t1 ) > 0 or d′u11 ,v11 (s, t1 ) = 0.
1. If d′u11 ,v11 (s, t1 ) > 0, then since d′′u11 ,v11 (s, t1 ) ≥ 0 always holds, we have du11 ,v11 (s, t1 ) < du11 ,v11 (s′ , t′1 ).
Since d(s) = du11 ,v11 (s, t1 ) and dmax (s′ ) ≥ d(s′ , t′1 ) = du11 ,v11 (s′ , t′1 ), we obtain that dmax (s′ ) > d(s),
which proves the lemma.
2. If d′u11 ,v11 (s, t1 ) = 0, recall that d′′u11 ,v11 (s, t1 ) ≥ 0 always holds. If d′′u11 ,v11 (s, t1 ) > 0, then we again
obtain du11 ,v11 (s, t1 ) < du11 ,v11 (s′ , t′1 ), and consequently, dmax (s′ ) > d(s).
Otherwise, d′′u11 ,v11 (s, t1 ) = 0. We claim that this case cannot happen. Indeed, suppose to the contrary that d′′u11 ,v11 (s, t1 ) = 0. Then, we have du11 ,v11 (s, t1 ) = du11 ,v11 (s′ , t′1 ). Since πu1j ,v1j (s′ , t′1 ) for
j = 2, 3 is also a shortest path from s to t′1 , we have du11 ,v11 (s′ , t′1 ) = du12 ,v12 (s′ , t′1 ) = du13 ,v13 (s′ , t′1 ),
and thus, du12 ,v12 (s, t1 ) = du12 ,v12 (s′ , t′1 ) and du13 ,v13 (s, t1 ) = du13 ,v13 (s′ , t′1 ). This is only possible if
d′u1j ,v1j (s, t1 ) = 0 and d′′u1j ,v1j (s, t1 ) = 0 for both j = 2, 3. However, by Observation 6, t1 is in the
interior of the triangle △v11 v12 v13 ; as discussed earlier (i.e., the discussions for Fig. 6), this implies
that it is not possible to have d′u1j ,v1j (s, t1 ) = 0 and d′′u1j ,v1j (s, t1 ) = 0 for all j = 1, 2, 3, incurring
contradiction.
This completes the proof of the lemma.
Lemma 18. For any two points s1 and s2 of Sd that are in the interior of the same cell or the same
edge of Dspm , if d(s1 ) < d(s2 ), then s1 cannot be a geodesic center, and if d(s1 ) = d(s2 ), then neither
s1 nor s2 is a geodesic center.
Proof: Consider any two points s1 and s2 of Sd that are in the interior of the same cell or the same
edge of Dspm. By Lemma 17, dmax (s1 ) > d(s2 ) and dmax (s2 ) > d(s1 ).
If d(s1 ) < d(s2 ), then we obtain dmax (s1 ) > d(s2 ) > d(s1 ). Thus, s1 cannot be a geodesic center
since otherwise d(s1 ) would be equal to dmax (s1 ) by Observation 7.
42
Similarly, if d(s1 ) = d(s2 ), then we have both dmax (s1 ) > d(s2 ) = d(s1 ) and dmax (s2 ) > d(s1 ) =
d(s2 ). Thus, neither s1 nor s2 is a geodesic center.
Based on Lemma 18, our pruning algorithm for Sd works as follows. For each point s of Sd , we
determine the cell, edge, or vertex of Dspm that contains s in its interior, which can be done in O(log n)
time by using a point location data structure [9,14] with O(n10 ) time and space preprocessing on Dspm .
For each edge or cell, let Sd′ be the set of points of Sd that are contained in its interior. We find the
point s of Sd′ with the largest value d(s). If there are more than one such point in Sd′ , we remove all
points of Sd′ from Sd ; otherwise, remove all points of Sd′ except s from Sd . By Lemma 18, none of
the points of Sd that are removed above is a geodesic center. After the above pruning algorithm, Sd
contains at most one point in the interior of each cell, edge, or vertex of Dspm . Hence, |Sd | = O(|Dspm |).
Since |Dspm | = O(n10 ) [7], we obtain |Sd | = O(n10 ).
Theorem 1. All geodesic centers of P can be computed in O(n11 log n) time.
Acknowledgment
The author wishes to thank Yan Sun for the discussions on proving the π-range property.
References
1. H.-K. Ahn, L. Barba, P. Bose, J.-L. De Carufel, M. Korman, and E. Oh. A linear-time algorithm for the geodesic
center of a simple polygon. In Proc. of the 31st Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG), pages
209–223, 2015.
2. T. Asano and G. Toussaint. Computing the geodesic center of a simple polygon. Technical Report SOCS-85.32,
McGill University, Montreal, Canada, 1985.
3. S.W. Bae, M. Korman, and Y. Okamoto. The geodesic diameter of polygonal domains. Discrete and Computational
Geometry, 50:306–329, 2013.
4. S.W. Bae, M. Korman, and Y. Okamoto. Computing the geodesic centers of a polygonal domain. In Proc. of the 26th
Canadian Conference on Computational Geometry (CCCG), 2014. Journal version published online in Computational
Geometry: Theory and Applications, 2015.
5. S.W. Bae, M. Korman, Y. Okamoto, and H. Wang. Computing the L1 geodesic diameter and center of a simple
polygon in linear time. Computational Geometry: Theory and Applications, 48:495–505, 2015.
6. B. Chazelle. A theorem on polygon cutting with applications. In Proc. of the 23rd Annual Symposium on Foundations
of Computer Science, pages 339–349, 1982.
7. Y.-J. Chiang and J.S.B. Mitchell. Two-point Euclidean shortest path queries in the plane. In Proc. of the Annual
ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pages 215–224, 1999.
8. H.N. Djidjev, A. Lingas, and J.-R. Sack. An O(n log n) algorithm for computing the link center of a simple polygon.
Discrete and Computational Geometry, 8:131–152, 1992.
9. H. Edelsbrunner, L. Guibas, and J. Stolfi. Optimal point location in a monotone subdivision. SIAM Journal on
Computing, 15(2):317–340, 1986.
10. D. Halperin and M. Sharir. New bounds for lower envelopes in three dimensions, with applications to visibility in
terrains. Discrete and Computational Geometry, 12:313–326, 1994.
11. J. Hershberger and S. Suri. Matrix searching with the shortest-path metric. SIAM Journal on Computing, 26(6):1612–
1634, 1997.
12. J. Hershberger and S. Suri. An optimal algorithm for Euclidean shortest paths in the plane. SIAM Journal on
Computing, 28(6):2215–2256, 1999.
13. Y. Ke. An efficient algorithm for link-distance problems. In Proc. of the 5th Annual Symposium on Computational
Geometry, pages 69–78, 1989.
14. D. Kirkpatrick. Optimal search in planar subdivisions. SIAM Journal on Computing, 12(1):28–35, 1983.
15. J.S.B. Mitchell. Geometric shortest paths and network optimization, in Handbook of Computational Geometry, J.-R
Sack and J. Urrutia (eds.), pages 633–702. Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 2000.
16. B.J. Nilsson and S. Schuierer. Computing the rectilinear link diameter of a polygon. In Proc. of the International
Workshop on Computational Geometry - Methods, Algorithms and Applications, pages 203–215, 1991.
17. B.J. Nilsson and S. Schuierer. An optimal algorithm for the rectilinear link center of a rectilinear polygon. Computational Geometry, 6:169–194, 1996.
18. R. Pollack, M. Sharir, and G. Rote. Computing the geodesic center of a simple polygon. Discrete and Computational
Geometry, 4(1):611–626, 1989.
43
19. S. Schuierer. An optimal data structure for shortest rectilinear path queries in a simple rectilinear polygon. International Journal of Compututational Geometry and Applications, 6:205–226, 1996.
20. S. Suri. Computing geodesic furthest neighbors in simple polygons. Journal of Computer and System Sciences,
39:220–235, 1989.
44
| 8cs.DS
|
Constructive Galois Connections
arXiv:1511.06965v4 [cs.PL] 26 Oct 2016
Taming the Galois Connection Framework for Mechanized Metatheory
David Darais
David Van Horn
University of Maryland, USA
[email protected]
University of Maryland, USA
[email protected]
Abstract
pings between the domains known as abstraction α ∈ C 7→ A and
concretization γ ∈ A 7→ C such that c ⊑ γ(a) ⇐⇒ α(c) a.
Since its introduction by Cousot and Cousot in the late 1970s,
this theory has formed the basis of many static analyzers, type
systems, model-checkers, obfuscators, program transformations,
and many more applications [7].
Given the remarkable set of intellectual tools contributed by
this theory, an obvious desire is to incorporate its use into proof
assistants to mechanically verify proofs by abstract interpretation.
When embedded in a proof assistant, verified algorithms such as
static analyzers can then be extracted from these proofs.
Monniaux first achieved the goal of mechanization for the theory of abstract interpretation with Galois connections in Coq [26].
However, he notes that the abstraction side (α) of Galois connections poses a serious problem since it requires the admission of
non-constructive axioms. Use of these axioms prevents the extraction of certified programs. So while Monniaux was able to mechanically verify proofs by abstract interpretation in its full generality,
certified artifacts could not generally be extracted.
Pichardie subsequently tackled the extraction problem by mechanizing a restricted formulation of abstract interpretation that relied
only on the concretization (γ) side of Galois connections [29]. Doing so avoids the use of axioms and enables extraction of certified
artifacts. This proof technique is effective and has been used to construct several certified static analyzers [1, 5, 6, 29], most notably the
Verasco static analyzer, part of the CompCert C compiler [18, 19].
Unfortunately, this approach sacrifices the full generality of the theory. While in principle the technique could achieve mechanization
of existing soundness theorems, it cannot do so faithful to existing
proofs. In particular, Pichardie writes [29, p. 55]:1
Galois connections are a foundational tool for structuring abstraction in semantics and their use lies at the heart of the theory of
abstract interpretation. Yet, mechanization of Galois connections
remains limited to restricted modes of use, preventing their general
application in mechanized metatheory and certified programming.
This paper presents constructive Galois connections, a variant
of Galois connections that is effective both on paper and in proof
assistants; is complete with respect to a large subset of classical
Galois connections; and enables more general reasoning principles,
including the “calculational” style advocated by Cousot.
To design constructive Galois connection we identify a restricted mode of use of classical ones which is both general and
amenable to mechanization in dependently-typed functional programming languages. Crucial to our metatheory is the addition of
monadic structure to Galois connections to control a “specification effect”. Effectful calculations may reason classically, while
pure calculations have extractable computational content. Explicitly moving between the worlds of specification and implementation is enabled by our metatheory.
To validate our approach, we provide two case studies in mechanizing existing proofs from the literature: one uses calculational
abstract interpretation to design a static analyzer, the other forms a
semantic basis for gradual typing. Both mechanized proofs closely
follow their original paper-and-pencil counterparts, employ reasoning principles not captured by previous mechanization approaches,
support the extraction of verified algorithms, and are novel.
Categories and Subject Descriptors F.3.2 [Semantics of Programming Languages]: Program analysis
Keywords
The framework we have retained nevertheless loses an important property of the standard framework: being able to
derive a correct approximation f ♯ from the specification
α ◦ f ◦ γ. Several examples of such derivations are given
by Cousot [8]. It seems interesting to find a framework for
this kind of symbolic manipulation, while remaining easily
formalizable in Coq.
Abstract Interpretation, Galois Connections, Monads
1. Introduction
Abstract interpretation is a general theory of sound approximation
widely applied in programming language semantics, formal verification, and static analysis [10–14]. In abstract interpretation, properties of programs are related between a pair of partially ordered
sets: a concrete domain, hC, ⊑i, and an abstract domain, hA, i.
When concrete properties have a -most precise abstraction, the
correspondence is a Galois connection, formed by a pair of map-
This important property is the so-called “calculational” style,
whereby an abstract interpreter (f ♯ ) is derived in a correct-byconstruction manner from a concrete interpreter (f ) composed with
abstraction and concretization (α◦f ◦γ). This style of abstract interpretation is detailed in Cousot’s monograph [8], which concludes:
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or
classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed
for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation
on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM
must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish,
to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a
fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Copyright is held by the owner/author(s). Publication rights licensed to ACM.
ICFP’16, September 18–24, 2016, Nara, Japan
ACM. 978-1-4503-4219-3/16/09...$15.00
http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2951913.2951934
The emphasis in these notes has been on the correctness of
the design by calculus. The mechanized verification of this
formal development using a proof assistant can be foreseen
with automatic extraction of a correct program from its
correctness proof.
1
1
Translated from French by the present authors.
2. Verifying a Simple Static Analyzer
In the subsequent 17 years, this vision has remained unrealized,
and clearly the paramount technical challenge in achieving it is
obtaining both generality and constructivity in a single framework.
This paper contributes constructive Galois connections, a framework for mechanized abstract interpretation with Galois connections that achieves both generality and constructivity, thereby enabling calculational style proofs which make use of both abstraction (α) and concretization (γ), while also maintaining the ability
to extract certified static analyzers.
We develop constructive Galois connections from the insight
that many classical Galois connections used in practice are of a particular restricted form, which is reminiscent of a direct-style verification. Constructive Galois connections are the general abstraction
theory for this setting and can be mechanized effectively.
We observe that constructive Galois connections contain monadic
structure which isolates classical specifications from constructive
algorithms. Within the effectful fragment, all of classical Galois
connection reasoning can be employed, while within the pure fragment, functions must carry computational content. Remarkably,
calculations can move between these modalities and verified programs may be extracted from the end result of calculation.
To support the utility of our theory we build a library for constructive Galois connections in Agda [28] and mechanize two existing abstract interpretation proofs from the literature. The first is
drawn from Cousot’s monograph [8], which derives a correct-byconstruction analyzer from a specification induced by a concrete
interpreter and Galois connection. The second is drawn from Garcia, Clark and Tanter’s “Abstracting Gradual Typing” [17], which
uses abstract interpretation to derive static and dynamic semantics for gradually typed languages from traditional static types.
Both proofs use the “important property of the standard framework” identified by Pichardie, which is not handled by prior mechanization approaches. The mechanized proofs closely follow the
original pencil-and-paper proofs, which use both abstraction and
concretization, while still enabling the extraction of certified algorithms. Neither of these papers have been previously mechanized.
Moreover, we know of no existing mechanized proof involving calculational abstract interpretation.
Finally, we develop the metatheory of constructive Galois connections, prove them sound, and make precise their relationship
to classical Galois connections. The metatheory is itself mechanized; claims are marked with “AGDAX” whenever they are proved
in Agda. (All claims are marked.)
In this section we contrast two perspectives on verifying a static analyzer: using a direct approach, and using the theory of abstract interpretation with Galois connections. The direct approach is simple
but lacks the benefits of a general abstraction framework. Abstract
interpretation provides these benefits, but at the cost of added complexity and resistance to mechanized verification. In Section 3 we
present an alternative perspective: abstract interpretation with constructive Galois connections—the topic of this paper. Constructive
Galois connections marry the worlds presented in this section, providing the simplicity of direct verification, the benefits of a general
abstraction framework, and support for mechanized verification.
To demonstrate both verification perspectives we design a parity
analyzer in each style. For example, a parity analysis discovers
that 2 has parity even, succ(1) has parity even, and n + n has
parity even if n has parity odd. Rather than sketch the highlevel details of a complete static analyzer, we instead zoom into
the low-level details of a tiny fragment: analyzing the successor
arithmetic operation succ(n). At this level of detail the differences,
advantages and disadvantages of each approach become apparent.
2.1 The Direct Approach
Using the direct approach to verification one designs the analyzer,
defines what it means for the analyzer to be sound, and then completes a proof of soundness. Each step is done from scratch, and in
the simplest way possible.
This approach should be familiar to most readers, and exemplifies how most researchers approach formalizing soundness for
static analyzers: first posit the analyzer and soundness framework,
then attempt the proof of soundness. One limitation of this approach is that the setup—which gives lots of room for error—isn’t
known to be correct until after completing the final proof. However,
a benefit of this approach is it can easily be mechanized.
Analyzing Successor A parity analysis answers questions like:
“what is the parity of succ(n), given that n is even?” To answer
these questions, imagine replacing n with the symbol even, a
stand-in for an arbitrary even number. This hypothetical expression
succ(even) is interpreted by defining a successor function over
parities, rather than numbers, which we call succ♯ . This successor
operation on parities is designed such that if p is the parity for n,
succ♯ (p) will be the parity of succ(n):
Contributions This paper contributes the following:
P := {even, odd}
succ♯ (even) := odd
succ♯ : P → P
succ♯ (odd) := even
Soundness The soundness of succ♯ is defined using an interpretation for parities, which we notate JpK:
• a foundational theory of constructive Galois connections which
is both general and amenable to mechanization using a dependently typed functional programming language;
J K : P → ℘(N)
• a proof library and two case studies from the literature for
JevenK := {n | even(n)}
JoddK := {n | odd(n)}
Given this interpretation, a parity p is a valid analysis result for a
number n if the interpretation for p contains n, that is n ∈ JpK. The
analyzer succ♯ (p) is then sound if, when p is a valid analysis result
for some number n, succ♯ (p) is a valid analysis result for succ(n):
mechanized abstract interpretation; and
• the first mechanization of calculational abstract interpretation.
The remainder of the paper is organized as follows. First we
give a tutorial on verifying a simple analyzer from two different
perspectives: direct verification (§2.1) and abstract interpretation
with Galois connections (§2.2), highlighting mechanization issues
along the way. We then present constructive Galois connections as a
marriage of the two approaches (§3). We provide two case studies:
the mechanization of an abstract interpreter from Cousot’s calculational monograph (§4), and the mechanization of Garcia, Clark and
Tanter’s work on gradual typing via abstract interpretation (§5). Finally, we formalize the metatheory of constructive Galois connections (§6), relate our work to the literature (§7), and conclude (§8).
n ∈ JpK =⇒ succ(n) ∈ Jsucc♯ (p)K
(DA-Snd)
The proof is by case analysis on JpK; we show the case p = even:
2
n ∈ JevenK
⇔ even(n)
⇔ odd(succ(n))
⇔ succ(n) ∈ JoddK
* defn. of J K +
* defn. of even/odd +
* defn. of J K +
⇔ succ(n) ∈ Jsucc♯ (even)K
* defn. of succ♯ +
An Even Simpler Setup There is another way to define and prove
soundness: use a function which computes the parity of a number
in the definition of soundness. This approach is even simpler, and
will help foreshadow the constructive Galois connection setup.
parity : N → P
2.2 Classical Abstract Interpretation
To verify an analyzer using abstract interpretation with Galois connections, one first designs abstraction and concretization mappings
between sets N and P. These mappings are used to synthesize an
optimal specification for succ♯ . One then proves that a postulated
succ♯ meets this synthesized specification, or alternatively derives
the definition of succ♯ directly from the optimal specification.
In contrast to the direct approach, rather than design the definition of soundness, one instead designs the definition of abstraction within a structured framework. Soundness is not designed, it
is derived from the definition of abstraction. Finally, there is added
boilerplate in the abstract interpretation approach, which requires
lifting definitions and proofs to powersets ℘(N) and ℘(P).
parity(0) := even
parity(succ(n)) := f lip(parity(n))
where f lip(even) := odd and f lip(odd) := even. This gives an
alternative and equivalent way to relate a number and a parity, due
to the following correspondence:
n ∈ JpK ⇐⇒ parity(n) = p
(DA-Corr)
The soundness of the analyzer is then restated:
parity(n) = p =⇒ parity(succ(n)) = succ♯ (p)
Abstracting Sets Powersets are introduced in abstraction and
concretization functions to support relational mappings, like mapping the symbol even to the set of all even numbers. The mappings
are therefore between powersets ℘(N) and ℘(P). The abstraction
and concretization mappings must also satisfy correctness criteria,
detailed below, at which point they are called a Galois connection.
The abstraction mapping from ℘(N) to ℘(P) is notated α, and
is defined as the pointwise lifting of parity(n):
or by substituting parity(n) = p:
parity(succ(n)) = succ♯ (parity(n))
(DA-Snd*)
Both this statement for soundness and its proof are simpler than
before. The proof follows directly from the definition of parity
and the fact that succ♯ is identical to f lip.
The concretization mapping from ℘(P) to ℘(N) is notated γ, and
is defined as the flattened pointwise lifting of JpK:
γ(P ) := {n | p ∈ P ∧ n ∈ JpK}
γ : ℘(P) → ℘(N)
The correctness criteria for α and γ is the correspondence:
N ⊆ γ(P ) ⇐⇒ α(N ) ⊆ P
(GC-Corr)
The correspondence means that, to relate elements of different
sets—in this case ℘(N) and ℘(P)—it is equivalent to relate them
through either α or γ. Mappings like α and γ which share this
correspondence are called Galois connections.
An equivalent correspondence to (GC-Corr) is two laws relating
compositions of α and γ, called expansive and reductive:
Mechanized Verification This direct approach to verification is
amenable to mechanization using proof assistants like Coq and
Agda. These tools are founded on constructive logic in part to
support verified program extraction. In constructive logic, functions
f : A → B are computable and often defined inductively to ensure
they can be extracted and executed as programs. Analogously,
propositions P : ℘(A) are encoded constructively as undecidable
predicates P : A → prop where x ∈ P ⇔ P (x).
To mechanize the verification of succ♯ we first translate its
definition to a constructive setting unmodified. Next we translate
JpK to a relation I(p, n) defined inductively on n:
I(even, 0)
α(N ) := {parity(n) | n ∈ N }
α : ℘(N) → ℘(P)
The Main Idea Correspondences like (DA-Corr)—between an
interpretation for analysis results (JpK) and a function which computes analysis results (parity(n))—are central to the constructive
Galois Connection framework we will describe in Section 3. Using
correspondences like these, we build a general theory of abstraction
that recovers this direct approach to verification, mirrors all of the
benefits of abstract interpretation with classical Galois connections,
supports mechanized verification, and in some cases simplifies the
proof effort. We also observe that many classical Galois connections used in practice can be ported to this simpler setting.
N ⊆ γ(α(N ))
α(γ(P )) ⊆ P
(GC-Exp)
(GC-Red)
Property (GC-Red) ensures α is the best abstraction possible w.r.t.
γ. For example, a hypothetical definition α(N ) := {even, odd} is
expansive but not reductive because α(γ({even})) 6⊆ {even}.
In general, Galois connections are defined for arbitrary posets
hA, ⊑A i and hB, ⊑B i. The correspondence (GC-Corr) and its expansive/reductive variants are generalized in this setting to use partial orders ⊑A and ⊑B instead of subset ordering. We are also omitting monotonicity requirements for α and γ in our presentation (although (GC-Corr) implies monotonicity).
I(p, n)
I(f lip(p), succ(n))
The mechanized proof of (DA-Snd) using I is analogous to the
one we sketched, and the mechanized proof of (DA-Snd*) follows
directly by computation. The proof term for (DA-Snd*) in both Coq
and Agda is simply refl, the reflexivity judgment for syntactic
equality modulo computation in constructive logic.
Powerset Lifting The original functions succ and succ♯ cannot
be related through α and γ because they are not functions between
powersets. To remedy this they are lifted pointwise:
Wrapping Up The two different approaches to verification we
present are distinguished by which parts of the design are postulated, and which parts are derived. Using the direct approach, the
analysis succ♯ , the interpretation for parities JpK and the definition
of soundness are all postulated up-front. When the soundness setup
is correct but the analyzer is wrong, the proof at the end will not go
through and the analyzer must be redesigned. Even worse, when the
soundness setup and the analyzer are both wrong, the proof might
actually succeed, giving a false assurance in the soundness of the
analyzer. However, the direct approach is attractive because it is
simple and supports mechanized verification.
↑succ : ℘(N) → ℘(N)
↑succ(N ) := {succ(n) | n ∈ N }
↑succ♯ : ℘(P) → ℘(P)
↑succ♯ (P ) := {succ♯ (p) | p ∈ P }
These lifted operations are called the concrete interpreter and abstract interpreter, because the former operates over the concrete
domain ℘(Z) and the latter over the abstract domain ℘(P). In
the framework of abstract interpretation, static analyzers are just
abstract interpreters. Lifting to powersets is necessary to use the
abstract interpretation framework, and has the negative effect of
adding boilerplate to definitions and proofs of soundness.
3
Soundness The definition of soundness for succ♯ is synthesized
by relating ↑succ♯ to ↑succ composed with α and γ:
α(↑succ(γ(P ))) ⊆ ↑succ♯ (P )
Calculational Derivation of Abstract Interpreters Rather than
posit ↑succ♯ and prove it correct directly, one can instead derive its
definition through a calculational process. The process begins with
the optimal specification on the left-hand-side of (GC-Opt), and
reasons equationally towards the definition of a function. In this
way, ↑succ♯ is not postulated, rather it is derived by calculation,
and the result is both sound and optimal by construction.
The derivation is by case analysis on P which has four cases:
{}, {even}, {odd} and {even, odd}; we show P = {even}:
(GC-Snd)
The left-hand side of the ordering is an optimal specification for any
abstraction of ↑succ (a consequence of (GC-Corr)), and the subset ordering says ↑succ♯ is an over-approximation of this optimal
specification. The reason to over-approximate is because the specification is a mathematical description, and the abstract interpreter
is usually an algorithm, and therefore not always able to match the
specification precisely. The proof of (GC-Snd) is by case analysis
on P . We do not show the proof, rather we demonstrate a proof
later in this section which also synthesizes the definition of succ♯ .
One advantage of the abstract interpretation framework is that it
gives the researcher the choice between four soundness properties,
all of which are equivalent and generated by α and γ:
♯
α(↑succ(γ(P ))) ⊆ ↑succ (P )
(GC-Snd/αγ)
↑succ(γ(P )) ⊆ γ(↑succ♯ (P ))
(GC-Snd/γγ)
♯
α(↑succ(N )) ⊆ ↑succ (α(N ))
♯
↑succ(N ) ⊆ γ(↑succ (α(N )))
(GC-Snd/αα)
(GC-Snd/γα)
(GC-Opt)
Not all analyzers are optimal, however optimality helps identify
those which approximate too much. Consider the analyzer ↑succ♯′ :
↑succ♯′ (P ) := {even, odd}
Resistance to Mechanized Verification Despite the beauty and
utility of Galois connections, advocates of the approach have yet to
reconcile their use with advances in mechanized reasoning: every
mechanized verification of an executable abstract interpreter todate has resisted the use of Galois connections, even when initially
designed to take advantage of the framework.
The issue in mechanizing Galois connections amounts to a conflict between supporting both classical set-theoretic reasoning and
executable static analyzers. Supporting executable static analyzers
calls for constructive mathematics, a problem for α functions because they are often non-constructive, an observation first made
by Monniaux [26]. To work around this limitation, Pichardie [29]
advocates for designing abstract interpreters which are merely inspired by Galois connections, but ultimately avoiding their use
in verification, which he terms the “γ-only” approach. Successful verification projects such as Verasco adopt this “γ-only” approach [18, 19], despite the use of Galois connections in designing
the original Astrée analyzer [4].
To better understand the foundational issues with Galois connections and α functions, consider verifying the abstract interpretation approach to soundness for our parity analyzer using a
proof assistant built on constructive logic. In this setting, the encoding of the Galois connection must support elements of infi-
This analyzer reports that succ(n) could have any parity regardless
of the parity for n; it’s the analyzer that always says “I don’t know”.
This analyzer is perfectly sound but non-optimal.
Just like soundness, four completeness statements are generated
by α and γ, however each of the statements are not equivalent:
(GC-Cmp/αγ)
↑succ(γ(P )) = γ(↑succ (P ))
(GC-Cmp/γγ)
α(↑succ(N )) = ↑succ♯ (α(N ))
(GC-Cmp/αα)
↑succ(N ) = γ(↑succ♯ (α(N )))
(GC-Cmp/γα)
* defining ↑succ♯ +
Added Complexity The abstract interpretation approach requires
a Galois connection up-front which necessitates the introduction of
powersets ℘(N) and ℘(P). This results in powerset-lifted definitions and adds boilerplate set-theoretic reasoning to the proofs.
This is in contrast to the direct approach which never mentions
powersets of parities. Not using powersets results in more understandable soundness criteria, requires no boilerplate set-theoretic
reasoning, and results in fewer cases for the proof of soundness.
This boilerplate becomes magnified in a mechanized setting where
all details must be spelled out to a proof assistant. Furthermore,
the simpler proof of (DA-Snd*)—which was immediate from the
definition of parity—cannot be recovered within the abstract interpretation framework, which shows one abandons simpler proof
techniques in exchange for the benefits of abstract interpretation.
Because the left-hand-side is an optimal specification, an abstract
interpreter will never be strictly more precise. Therefore, optimality
is written equivalently using an equality:
♯
* defn. of α +
The derivation of the other cases is analogous, and together they
define the implementation of ↑succ♯ .
Deriving analyzers by calculus is attractive because it is systematic, and because it prevents the issue where an analyzer is postulated and discovered to be unsound only after failing to complete
its soundness proof. However, this calculational style of abstract
interpretation is not amenable to mechanized verification with program extraction because α is often non-constructive, an issue we
describe later in this section.
α(↑succ(γ(P ))) ⊇ ↑succ♯ (P )
α(↑succ(γ(P ))) = ↑succ♯ (P )
= {odd}
, ↑succ ({even})
Completeness The mappings α and γ also synthesize an optimality statement for ↑succ♯ , a kind of completeness property, by stating that it under-approximates the optimal specification:
↑succ♯′ : ℘(P) → ℘(P)
* defn. of γ +
* defn. of ↑succ +
* defn. of even/odd +
♯
Because each soundness property is equivalent (also a consequence
of (GC-Corr)), one can choose whichever variant is easiest to prove.
The soundness setup (GC-Snd) is the αγ rule, however any of the
other rules can also be used. For example, one could choose αα
or γα; in these cases the proof considers four disjoint cases for N :
N is empty, N contains only even numbers, N contains only odd
numbers, and N contains both even and odd numbers.
α(↑succ(γ(P ))) = ↑succ♯ (P )
α(↑succ(γ({even})))
= α(↑succ({n | even(n)}))
= α({succ(n) | even(n)})
= α({n | odd(n)})
Abstract interpreters which satisfy the αγ variant are called optimal
because they lose no more information than necessary, and those
which satisfy the γα variant are called precise because they lose no
information at all. The abstract interpreter succ♯ is optimal but not
precise, because γ(↑succ♯ (α({1}))) 6= ↑succ({1})
To overcome mechanization issues with Galois connections, the
state-of-the-art is restricted to use γγ rules only for soundness
(GC-Snd/γγ) and completeness (GC-Cmp/γγ). This is unfortunate
for completeness properties because each completeness variant is
not equivalent.
4
nite powersets—like the set of all even numbers—as well as executable abstract interpreters which manipulate elements of finite
powersets—like {even, odd}. To support representing infinite sets,
the powerset ℘(N) is modelled constructively as a predicate N →
prop. To support defining executable analyzers that manipulate sets
of parities, the powerset ℘(P) is modelled as an enumeration of its
inhabitants, which we call Pc :
Abstracting Sets A constructive Galois connection between sets
A and B contains two mappings: the first is called extraction,
notated η, and the second is called interpretation, notated µ:
η:A→B
η and µ are analogous to classical Galois connection mappings α
and γ. In the parity analysis described in Section 2.1, the extraction
function was parity and the interpretation function was J K.
Constructive Galois connection mappings η and µ must form a
correspondence similar to (GC-Corr):
Pc := {even, odd, ⊥, ⊤}
where ⊥ and ⊤ represent {} and {even, odd}. This enables a
definition for ↑succ♯ : Pc → Pc which can be extracted and
executed. The consequence of this design is a Galois connection
between N → prop and Pc ; the issue is now α:
α : (N → prop) → P
µ : B → ℘(A)
x ∈ µ(y) ⇐⇒ η(x) = y
(CGC-Corr)
The intuition behind the correspondence is the same as before: to
compare an element x in A to an element y in B, it is equivalent to
compare them through either η or µ.
Like classical Galois connections, the correspondence between
η and µ is stated equivalently through two composition laws. Extraction functions η which form a constructive Galois connection
are also a “best abstraction”, analogously to α in the classical setup:
c
This version of α cannot be defined constructively, as doing so
requires deciding predicates over φ : N → prop. To define α one
must perform case analysis on predicates like ∃n, φ(n) ∧ even(n)
to compute an element of Pc , which is not possible for arbitrary φ.
However, γ can be defined constructively:
sound : x ∈ µ(η(x))
tight : x ∈ µ(y) =⇒ η(x) = y
γ : Pc → (N → prop)
(CGC-Ext)
(CGC-Red)
In general, any theorem of soundness using Galois connections
can be rewritten to use only γ, making use of (GC-Corr); this is
the essence of the “γ-only” approach, embodied by the soundness
variant (GC-Snd/γγ). However, this principle does not apply to all
proofs of soundness using Galois connections, many of which mention α in practice. For example, the γ-only setup does not support
calculation in the style advocated by Cousot [8]. Furthermore, not
all completeness theorems can be translated to γ-only style, such as
(GC-Cmp/γα) which is used to show an abstract interpreter is fully
precise.
Aside We use the term extraction function and notation η from
Nielson et al [27] where η is used to simplify the definition of an
abstraction function α. We recover α functions from η in a similar
way. However, their treatment of η is a side-note to simplifying
the definition of α and nothing more. We take this simple idea
much further to realize an entire theory of abstraction around η/µ
functions and their correspondences. In this “lowered” theory of
η/µ we describe soundness/optimality criteria and calculational
derivations analogous to that of α/γ while support mechanized
verification, none of which is true of Nielson et al’s use of η.
Wrapping Up Abstract interpretation differs from the direct approach in which parts of the design are postulated and which parts
are derived. The direct approach requires postulating the analyzer
and definition of soundness. Using abstract interpretation, a Galois
connection between sets is postulated instead, and definitions for
soundness and completeness are synthesized from the Galois connection. Also, abstract interpretation support deriving the definition
of a static analyzer directly from its proof of correctness.
The downside of abstract interpretation is that it requires lifting succ and succ♯ into powersets, which results in boilerplate
set-theoretic reasoning in the proof of soundness. Finally, due to
foundational issues, the abstract interpretation framework is not
amenable to mechanized verification while also supporting program extraction using constructive logic.
Induced Specifications Four equivalent soundness criteria are
generated by η and µ just like in the classical framework. Each
soundness statement uses η and µ in a different but equivalent way
(assuming (CGC-Corr)). For a concrete f : A → A and abstract
f ♯ : B → B, f ♯ is sound if f any of the following properties hold:
x ∈ µ(y) ∧ y ′ = η(f (x)) =⇒ y ′ = f ♯ (y)
′
′
♯
x ∈ µ(y) ∧ x = f (x) =⇒ x ∈ µ(f (y))
♯
(CGC-Snd/ηµ)
(CGC-Snd/µµ)
y = η(f (x)) =⇒ y = f (η(x))
(CGC-Snd/ηη)
x′ = f (x) =⇒ x′ ∈ µ(f ♯ (η(x)))
(CGC-Snd/µη)
In the direct approach to verifying an example parity analysis
described in Section 2.1, the first soundness property (DA-Snd) is
generated by the µµ variant, and the second soundness property
(DA-Snd*) which enjoyed a simpler proof is generated by the ηη
variant. We write these soundness rules in a slightly strange way
so we can write their completeness analogs simply by replacing
⇒ with ⇔. The origin of these rules comes from an adjunction
framework, which we discuss in Section 6.
The mappings η and µ also generate four completeness criteria
which, like classical Galois connections, are not equivalent:
3. Constructive Galois Connections
In this section we describe abstract interpretation with constructive Galois connections—a parallel universe of Galois connections
analogous to classical ones. The framework enjoys all the benefits
of abstract interpretation, but like the direct approach avoids the
pitfalls of added complexity and resistance to mechanization.
We will describe the framework of constructive Galois connections between sets A and B. When instantiated to N and P, the
framework recovers exactly the direct approach from Section 2.1.
We will also describe constructive Galois connections in the absence of partial orders, or more specifically, we will assume the
discrete partial order: x ⊑ y ⇔ x = y. (Partial orders didn’t appear in our demonstration of classical abstract interpretation, but
they are essential to the general theory.) We describe generalizing
to partial orders and recovering classical results from constructive
ones at the end of this section. The fully general theory of constructive Galois connections is described in Section 6 where it is
compared side-by-side to classical Galois connections.
x ∈ µ(y) ∧ y ′ = η(f (x)) ⇐⇒ y ′ = f ♯ (y)
′
′
(CGC-Cmp/ηµ)
♯
x ∈ µ(y) ∧ x = f (x) ⇐⇒ x ∈ µ(f (y)) (CGC-Cmp/µµ)
y = η(f (x)) ⇐⇒ y = f ♯ (η(x))
′
′
♯
x = f (x) ⇐⇒ x ∈ µ(f (η(x)))
(CGC-Cmp/ηη)
(CGC-Cmp/µη)
Inspired by classical Galois connections, we call abstract interpreters f ♯ which satisfy the ηµ variant optimal and those which
satisfy the µη variant precise.
The above soundness and completeness rules are stated for concrete and abstraction functions f : A → A and f ♯ : B → B.
5
However, they generalize easily to relations R : ℘(A × A) and
predicate transformers F : ℘(A) → ℘(A) (i.e. collecting semantics) through the adjunction framework discussed in Section 6. The
case studies in Sections 4 and 5 describe abstract interpreters over
concrete relations and their soundness conditions.
and sound and optimal by construction. In addition to these benefits of a general abstraction framework, constructive Galois connections are amenable to mechanized verification. Both extraction
(η) and interpretation (µ) can be mechanized effectively, as well as
proofs of soundness, completeness, and calculational derivations.
Calculational Derivation of Abstract Interpreters The constructive Galois connection framework also supports deriving abstract
interpreters through calculation, analogously to the calculation we
demonstrated in Section 2.2. To support calculational reasoning,
the four logical soundness criteria are rewritten into statements
about subsumption between powerset elements:
3.1 Partial Orders and Monotonicity
♯
{η(f (x)) | x ∈ µ(y)} ⊆ {f (y)}
The full theory of constructive Galois connections generalizes to
posets hA, ⊑iA and hB, ⊑B i by making the following changes:
• Powersets must be downward-closed, that is for X : ℘(A):
x ∈ X ∧ x′ ⊑ x =⇒ x′ ∈ X
(CGC-Snd/ηµ*)
♯
{f (x) | x ∈ µ(y)} ⊆ µ(f (y))
Singleton sets {x} are reinterpreted to mean {x | x′ ⊑ x}.
For mechanization, this means ℘(A) is encoded as an antitonic
function, notated with a down-right arrow A → prop, where
the partial ordering on prop is by implication.
(CGC-Snd/µµ*)
♯
{η(f (x))} ⊆ {f (η(x))}
(CGC-Snd/ηη*)
♯
{f (x)} ⊆ µ(f (η(x)))
(PowerMon)
′
(CGC-Snd/µη*)
• Functions must be monotonic, that is for f : A → A:
x ⊑ x′ =⇒ f (x) ⊑ f (x′ )
The completeness analog to the four rules replaces set subsumption
with equality. Using the ηµ* completeness rule, one calculates
towards a definition for f ♯ starting from the left-hand-side, which
is the optimal specification for abstract interpreters of f .
To demonstrate calculation using constructive Galois connections, we show the derivation of succ♯ from its induced specification, the result of which is sound and optimal (because each step is
= in addition to ⊆) by construction; we show p = even:
(FunMon)
We notate monotonic functions f : A → A. Monotonicity
is required for mappings η and µ, and concrete and abstract
interpreters f and f ♯ .
• The constructive Galois connection correspondence is general-
ized to partial orders in place of equality, that is for η and µ:
x ∈ µ(y) ⇐⇒ η(x) ⊑ y
(CGP-Corr)
{parity(succ(n)) | n ∈ JevenK}
= {parity(succ(n)) | even(n)}
= {f lip(parity(n)) | even(n)}
= {f lip(even)}
* defn. of J K +
* defn. of parity +
* Eq. DA-Corr +
= {odd}
* defn. of f lip +
x ∈ µ(y) ∧ y ′ ⊑ η(f (x)) =⇒ y ′ ⊑ f ♯ (y) (CGP-Snd/ηµ)
, {succ♯ (even)}
* defining succ♯ +
x ∈ µ(y) ∧ x′ ⊑ f (x) =⇒ x′ ∈ µ(f ♯ (y)) (CGP-Snd/µµ)
or alternatively, by generalizing the reductive property:
x ∈ µ(y) =⇒ η(x) ⊑ y
• Soundness criteria are also generalized to partial orders:
y ⊑ η(f (x)) =⇒ y ⊑ f ♯ (η(x))
We will show another perspective on this calculation later in this
section, where the derivation of succ♯ is not only sound and optimal
by construction, but computable by construction as well.
′
′
♯
x ⊑ f (x) =⇒ x ∈ µ(f (η(x)))
(CGP-Snd/ηη)
(CGP-Snd/µη)
We were careful to write the equalities in Section 3 in the right
order so this change is just swappping = for ⊑. Completeness
criteria are identical with ⇔ in place of ⇒.
Mechanized Verification In addition to the benefits of a general abstraction framework, constructive Galois connections are
amenable to mechanization in a way that classical Galois connections are not. In our Agda library and case studies we mechanize
constructive Galois connections in full generality, as well as proofs
that use both mapping functions, such as calculational derivations.
As we discussed in Sections 2.1 and 2.2, the constructive encoding for infinite powersets ℘(A) is A → prop. This results in
the following types for η and µ when encoded constructively:
η:N→P
(CGP-Red)
To demonstrate when partial orders and monotonicity are necessary, consider designing a parity analyzer for the max operator:
max♯ : P × P → P
max♯ (even, even) := even
max♯ (even, odd) := ?
max♯ (odd, odd) := odd
max♯ (odd, even) := ?
The last two cases for max♯ cannot be defined because the maximum of an even and odd number could be either even or odd, and
there is no representative for “any number” in P. To remedy this,
we add any to the set of parities: P+ := P∪{any}; the new element
any is interpreted: JanyK := {n | n ∈ N}; the partial order on P+
becomes: even, odd ⊑ any; and the correspondence continues to
hold using this partial order: n ∈ Jp+ K ⇐⇒ parity(n) ⊑ p+ .
max♯ is then defined using the abstraction P+ and proven sound
and optimal following the abstract interpretation paradigm.
µ : P → N → prop
In constructive logic, the arrow type N → P classifies computable
functions, and the arrow type P → N → prop classifies undecidable relations. (CGC-Corr) is then mechanized without issue:
µ(p, n) ⇐⇒ η(n) = p
See the mechanization details in Section 2.1 for how η and µ are
defined constructively for the example parity analysis.
Wrapping Up Constructive Galois connections are a general abstraction framework similar to classical Galois connections. At the
heart of the constructive Galois connection framework is a correspondence (CGC-Corr) analogous to its classical counterpart. From
this correspondence, soundness and completeness criteria are synthesized for abstract interpreters. Constructive Galois connections
also support calculational derivations of abstract interpreters which
3.2 Relationship to Classical Galois Connections
We clarify the relationship between constructive and classical Galois connections in three ways:
• Any constructive Galois connection can be lifted to obtain an
equivalent classical Galois connection, and likewise for soundness and completeness proofs.
6
• Any classical Galois connection which can be recovered by a
The monadic structure of classical powersets is standard, and is
analogous to the nondeterminism monad familiar to Haskell programmers. However, the model ℘(A) = A → prop is the uncomputable nondeterminism monad and mirrors the use of setcomprehensions on paper to describe uncomputable sets (specifications), rather than the use of monad comprehensions in Haskell
to describe computable sets (constructed values).
We generalize ℘( ) to a monotonic monad, similarly to how
we generalized powersets to posets in Section 3.1. This results in
monotonic versions of monad operators ret and bind:
constructive one contains no additional expressive power, rendering it an equivalent theory with added boilerplate reasoning.
• Not all classical Galois connections can be recovered by con-
structive ones.
From these relationships we conclude that one benefits from using
constructive Galois connections whenever possible, classical Galois connections when no constructive one exists, and both theories
together as needed. We make these claims precise in Section 6.
A classical Galois connection is recovered from a constructive
one by the following lifting:
α : ℘(A) → ℘(B)
γ : ℘(B) → ℘(A)
ret : A → ℘(A)
ret(x) := {x′ | x′ ⊑ x}
α(X) := {η(x) | x ∈ X}
γ(Y ) := {x | y ∈ Y ∧ x ∈ µ(y)}
bind : ℘(A) × (A → ℘(B)) → ℘(B)
bind(X, f ) := {y | x ∈ X ∧ y ∈ f (x)}
We adopt Moggi’s notation [25] for monadic extension where
bind(X, f ) is written f ∗ (X), or just f ∗ for λX.f ∗ (X).
We call the powerset type ℘(A) a specification effect because it
has monadic structure, supports encoding arbitrary properties over
values in A, and cannot be “escaped from” in constructive logic,
similar to the IO monad in Haskell. In classical mathematics, there
is an isomorphism between singleton powersets ℘1 (A) and the set
A. However, no such constructive mapping exists for ℘1 (A) → A.
Such a function would decide arbitrary predicates in A → prop to
compute the A inside the singleton set. This observation, that you
can program inside ℘( ) monadically in constructive logic, but you
can’t escape the monad, is why we call it a specification effect.
Given the monadic structure for powersets, and the intuition
that they encode a specification effect in constructive logic, we can
recast the theory of constructive Galois connections using monadic
operators. To do this we define a helper operator which injects
“pure” functions into the “effectful” function space:
When a classical Galois connection can be written in this form for
some η and µ, then one can use the simpler setting of abstract interpretation with constructive Galois connections without any loss
of generality. We also observe that many classical Galois connections in practice can be written in this form, and therefore can be
mechanized effectively using constructive Galois connections. The
case studies in presented in Sections 4 and 5 are two such cases,
although the original authors of those works did not initially write
their classical Galois connections in this explicitly lifted form.
An example of a classical Galois connection which is not recovered by lifting a constructive Galois is the Independent Attributes
(IA) abstraction, which abstracts relations R : ℘(A × B) with their
component-wise splitting hRl , Rr i : ℘(A) × ℘(B):
α : ℘(A × B) → ℘(A) × ℘(B)
α(R) := h{x | ∃y.hx, yi ∈ R}, {y | ∃x.hx, yi ∈ R}i
γ : ℘(A) × ℘(B) → ℘(A × B)
γ(Rl , Rr ) := {hx, yi | x ∈ Rl , y ∈ Rr }
pure : (A → B) → (A → ℘(B)) pure(f )(x) := ret(f (x))
We then rewrite (CGC-Corr) using ret and pure:
ret(x) ⊆ µ(y) ⇐⇒ pure(η)(x) ⊆ ret(y)
This Galois connection is amenable to mechanized verification. In
a constructive setting, α and γ are maps between A × B → prop
and (A → prop) × (B → prop), and can be defined directly using
logical connectives ∃ and ∧:
(CGM-Corr)
and we rewrite the expansive and reductive variant of the correspondence using ret, bind (notated f ∗ ) and pure:
ret(x) ⊆ µ∗ (pure(η)(x))
α(R) := hλ(x).∃(y).R(x, y), λ(y).∃(x).R(x, y)i
γ(Rl , Rr ) := λ(x, y).Rl (x) ∧ Rr (y)
∗
pure(η) (µ(y)) ⊆ ret(y)
(CGM-Exp)
(CGM-Red)
The four soundness and completeness conditions can also be written in monadic style; we show the ηµ soundness property here:
IA can be mechanized effectively because the Galois connection
consists of mappings between specifications and the foundational
issue of constructing values from specifications does not appear.
IA is not a constructive Galois connection because there is no pure
function µ underlying the abstraction function α.
Because constructive Galois connections can be lifted to classical ones, a constructive Galois connection can interact directly with
IA through its lifting, even in a mechanized setting. However, once
a constructive Galois connection is lifted it loses its computational
properties and cannot be extracted and executed. In practice, IA is
used to weaken (⊑) an induced optimal specification after which
the calculated interpreter is shown to be optimal (=) up-to-IA. IA
never appears in the final calculated interpreter, so not having a
constructive Galois connection formulation poses no issue.
pure(η)∗ (pure(f )∗ (µ(y))) ⊆ pure(f ♯ )(y)
(CGM-Snd)
The left-hand-side of the ordering is the optimal specification for
f ♯ , just like (CGC-Snd/ηµ) but using monadic operators. The righthand-side of the ordering is f ♯ lifted to the monadic function space.
The constructive calculation of succ♯ we showed earlier in this
section is a calculation of this form. The specification on the left
has type ℘(P), and it has effects, meaning it uses classical reasoning
and can’t be executed. The abstract interpreter on the right also has
type ℘(P), but it has no effects, meaning it can be extracted and
executed. The calculated abstract interpreter is thus not only sound
and optimal by construction, it is computable by construction.
Constructive Galois connections are empowering because they
treat specification like an effect, which optimal specifications ought
to have, and which computable abstract interpreters ought not to
have. Using a monadic effect discipline we support calculations
which start with a specification effect, and where the “effect” is
eliminated through the process of calculation. The monad laws
are crucial in canceling uses of ret with bind to arrive at a final
pure computation. For example, the first step in a derivation for
(CGM-Snd) can immediately simplify using monad laws to:
3.3 The “Specification Effect”
The machinery of constructive Galois connections follow a monadic
effect discipline, where the effect type is the classical powerset
℘( ); we call this a specification effect. First we will describe the
monadic structure of powersets ℘( ) and what we mean by “specification effect”. Then we will recast the theory of constructive
Galois connections in this monadic style, giving insights into why
the theory supports mechanized verification, and foreshadowing
key fragments of the metatheory we develop in Section 6.
pure(η ◦ f )∗ (µ(y)) ⊆ pure(f ♯ )(y)
7
i∈
b∈
Z := {. . . , −1, 0, 1, . . .}
B := {true, f alse}
integers
ρ ∈ env := var ⇀ Z
a
ς ∈ Σ ::= hρ, cei
a
J K ∈ aop → Z × Z ⇀ Z
⊢ ⇓
variables
J Kc ∈ cmp → Z × Z → B
⊢ ⇓b ∈ ℘(env × bexp × B)
⊕ ∈ aop ::= + | − | × | /
arithmetic op.
J Kb ∈ bop → B × B → B
< ∈ cmp ::= < | =
comparison op.
<
booleans
x ∈ var ::= . . .
∈ bop ::= ∨ | ∧
arithmetic exp.
be ∈ bexp ::= b | ae < ae | be
boolean exp.
<
ae ∈ aexp ::= i | x | rand | ae ⊕ ae
be
AR AND
ρ ⊢ ae1 ⇓a i1
ρ ⊢ ae2 ⇓a i2
AO P
a
ρ ⊢ ae1 ⊕ ae2 ⇓ J⊕Ka (i1 , i2 )
ce ∈ cexp ::= skip | ce ; ce | x := ae
ρ ⊢ ae ⇓a i
CA SSIGN
hρ, x := aei 7→c hρ[x ← i], skipi
| if be then ce else ce
| while be do ce
7→c ∈ ℘(Σ × Σ)
ρ ⊢ rand ⇓a i
boolean op.
∈ ℘(env × aexp × Z)
command exp.
ρ ⊢ be ⇓b true
CW HILE -T
hρ, while be do cei 7→c hρ, ce ; while be do cei
Figure 1. Case Study: WHILE abstract syntax
ρ ⊢ be ⇓b f alse
CW HILE -F
hρ, while be do cei 7→c hρ, skipi
4. Case Study: Calculational AI
In this section we apply constructive Galois connections to the Calculational Design of a Generic Abstract Interpreter from Cousot’s
monograph [8]. To our knowledge, we achieve the first mechanically verified abstract interpreter derived by calculus.
The key challenge in mechanizing the interpreter is supporting
both abstraction (α) and concretization (γ) mappings, which are required by the calculational approach. Classical Galois connections
do not support mechanization of the abstraction mapping without
the use of axioms, and the required axioms block computation, preventing the extraction of verified algorithms.
To verify Cousot’s generic abstract interpreter we use constructive Galois connections, which we describe in Section 3 and formalize in Section 6. Using constructive Galois connections we encode extraction (η) and interpretation (µ) mappings as constructive
analogs to α and γ, calculate an abstract interpreter for an imperative programming language which is sound and computable by
construction, and recover the original classical Galois connection
results through a systematic lifting.
First we describe the setup for the analyzer: the abstract syntax, the concrete semantics, and the constructive Galois connections involved. Following the abstract interpretation paradigm with
constructive Galois connections we design abstract interpreters for
denotation functions and semantics relations. We show a fragment
of our Agda mechanization which closely mirrors the pencil-andpaper proof, as well as Cousot’s original derivation.
Figure 2. Case Study: WHILE concrete semantics
4.2 Abstract Semantics with Constructive GCs
Using abstract interpretation with constructive Galois connections,
we design an abstract semantics for WHILE in the following steps:
1. An abstraction for each set Z, B and env.
2. An abstraction for each denotation function J Ka , J Kc and J Kb .
3. An abstraction for each semantics relation ⇓a , ⇓b and 7→c .
Each abstract set forms a constructive Galois connection with its
concrete counterpart. Soundness criteria is synthesized for abstract
functions and relations using constructive Galois connection mappings. Finally, we verify and calculate abstract interpreters from
these specifications which are sound and computable by construction. We describe the details of this process only for integers and
environments (the sets Z and env), arithmetic operators (the denotation function J Ka ), and arithmetic expressions (the semantics
relation ⇓a ). See the Agda development accompanying this paper
for the full mechanization of WHILE.
Abstracting Integers We design a simple sign abstraction for integers, although more powerful abstractions are certainly possible [24]. The final abstract interpreter for WHILE is parameterized
by any abstraction for integers, meaning another abstraction can be
plugged in without added proof effort.
The sign abstraction begins with three representative elements:
neg, zer and pos, representing negative integers, the integer 0, and
positive integers. To support representing integers which could be
negative or 0, negative or positive, or 0 or positive, etc. we design
a set which is complete w.r.t these logical disjunctions:
4.1 Concrete Semantics
The WHILE language is an imperative programming language with
arithmetic expressions, variable assignment and while-loops. We
show the syntax for this language in Figure 1. WHILE syntactically
distinguished arithmetic, boolean and command expressions. rand
is an arithmetic expression which can evaluate to any integer. Syntactic categories ⊕, < and range over arithmetic, comparison and
boolean operators, and are introduced to simplify the presentation.
The WHILE language is taken from Cousot’s monograph [8].
The concrete semantics of WHILE is sketched without full definition in Figure 2. Denotation functions J Ka , J Kc and J Kb give
semantics to arithmetic, conditional and boolean operators. The semantics of compound syntactic expressions are given operationally
with relations ⇓a , ⇓b and 7→c . Relational semantics are given for
arithmetic expressions and commands due to the nondeterminism
of rand and nontermination of while. These semantics serve as
the starting point for designing an abstract interpreter.
<
i♯ ∈ Z♯ := {none, neg, zer, pos, negz, nzer, posz, any}
Z♯ is given meaning through an interpretation function µz , the
analog of a γ from the classical Galois connection framework:
µz : Z♯ → ℘(Z)
µz (none) := {}
µz (neg) := {i | i < 0}
µz (zer) := {0}
µz (pos) := {i | i > 0}
8
µz (negz) := {i | i ≤ 0}
µz (nzer) := {i | i 6= 0}
µz (posz) := {i | i ≥ 0}
µz (any) := {i | i ∈ Z}
The partial ordering on abstract integers coincides with subset
ordering through µz , that is i♯1 ⊑z i♯2 ⇐⇒ µz (i♯1 ) ⊆ µz (i♯2 ):
The specification which encodes soundness and optimality for
J K♯a is generated using the constructive Galois connection for Z:
neg ⊑z negz, nzer
pos ⊑z nzer, posz
♯′
z
a
♯′ ♯′
♯a ♯ ♯
hi1,i2i ∈ µz(i♯1,i♯2) ∧ hi♯′
1 ,i2 i ⊑ η (JaeK (i1,i2)) ⇔ hi1 ,i2 i ⊑ JaeK (i1,i2)
zer ⊑z negz, posz
none ⊑z i♯ ⊑z i♯ ⊑z any
(See (CGC-Cmp/ηµ) in Section 3 for the origin of this equation.)
For J K♯a , we postulate its definition and verify its correctness postfacto using the above property, although we omit the proof details
here. The definition of J K♯a is standard, and returns none in the
case of division by zero. We show only the definition of + here:
To be a constructive Galois connection, µz forms a correspondence
with a best abstraction function η z :
neg if i < 0
η z : Z → Z♯
η z (n) := zer if i = 0
pos if i > 0
J K♯a : aexp → Z♯ × Z♯ → Z♯
pos if pos ⊑z
z
neg if neg ⊑
G
♯a ♯ ♯
J+K (i1 , i2 ) :=
zer if zer ⊑z
zer if pos ⊑z
zer if neg ⊑z
and we prove the constructive Galois connection correspondence:
i ∈ µz (i♯ ) ⇐⇒ η z (i) ⊑z i♯
The Classical Design To contrast with Cousot’s original design
using classical abstract interpretation, the key difference is the abstraction function. The abstraction function using classical Galois
connections is recovered through a lifting of our η z :
G z
αz (I) :=
η (i)
αz : ℘(Z) → Z♯
J Ka℘ ∈ aexp → ℘(Z × Z) → ℘(Z)
JaeKa℘ (II) := {JaeKa (i1 , i2 ) | hi1 , i2 i ∈ II}
Abstraction functions of this form—℘(B) → A, for some concrete set A and abstract set B—are representative of most Galois
connections used in the literature for static analyzers. However,
these abstraction functions are precisely the part of classical Galois
connections which inhibit mechanized verification. The extraction
function η z does not manipulate powersets, does not inhibit mechanized verification, and recovers the original non-constructive αz
through this standard lifting.
and then J K♯a is proven correct w.r.t. this lifting using αz and γ z :
αz (JaeKa℘ (γ z (i♯1 , i♯2 ))) = JaeK♯a (i♯1 , i♯2 )
This property cannot be mechanized without axioms because αz is
non-constructive. Furthermore, the proof involves additional powerset boilerplate reasoning, which is not present in our mechanization of correctness for J K♯a using constructive Galois connections.
The state-of-the art approach of “γ-only” verification would instead
mechanize the γγ variant of correctness:
Abstracting Environments An abstract environment maps variables to abstract integers rather than concrete integers.
ρ♯ ∈ env♯ := var → Z♯
JaeKa℘ (γ z (i♯1 , i♯2 )) = γ z (JaeK♯a (i♯1 , i♯2 ))
r
env is given meaning through an interpretation function µ :
which is similar to our µµ rule:
µr ∈ env♯ → ℘(env) µr (ρ♯ ) := {ρ | ∀x.ρ(x) ∈ µz (ρ♯ (x))}
An abstract environment represents concrete environments that
agree pointwise with some represented integer in the codomain.
The order on abstract environments is the standard pointwise
ordering and obeys ρ♯1 ⊑r ρ♯2 ⇐⇒ µr (ρ♯1 ) ⊆ µr (ρ♯2 ):
hi1, i2i ∈ µz(i♯1,i♯2) ∧ hi′1, i′2i = JaeKa(i1,i2) ⇔ hi′1, i′2i ∈ µz(JaeK♯a(i♯1,i♯2))
The benefit of our approach is that soundness and completeness
properties which also mention extraction (η) can also be mechanized, like calculating abstract interpreters from their specification.
Abstracting Relations The verification of an abstract interpreter
for relations is similar to the design for functions: induce a specification using the constructive Galois connection, and prove correctness w.r.t. the induced spec. The relations we abstract are ⇓a ,
⇓b and 7→c , and we call their abstract interpreters A♯ , B♯ and C ♯ .
Rather than postulate the definitions of the abstract interpreters, we
calculate them from their specifications, the results of which are
sound and computable by construction. The arithmetic and boolean
abstract interpreters are functions from abstract environments to abstract integers, and the abstract interpreter for commands computes
the next abstract transition states of execution. We only present select calculations for A♯ ; see our accompanying Agda development
for each calculation in mechanized form. A♯ has type:
ρ♯1 ⊑r ρ♯2 ⇐⇒ (∀x.ρ♯1 (x) ⊑z ρ♯2 (x))
To form a constructive Galois connection, µr forms a correspondence with a best abstraction function η r :
η r ∈ env → env♯
i♯2
i♯2
i♯2
i♯2
i♯2
The Classical Design To contrast with Cousot’s original design
using classical abstract interpretation, the key difference is that we
avoid powerset liftings all-together. Using classical Galois connections, the concrete denotation function must be lifted to powersets:
i∈I
♯
i♯1 ∨ pos ⊑z
i♯1 ∨ neg ⊑z
i♯1 ∧ zer ⊑z
i♯1 ∧ neg ⊑z
i♯1 ∧ pos ⊑z
η r (ρ) := λx.η z (ρ(x))
and we prove the constructive Galois connection correspondence:
ρ ∈ µr (ρ♯ ) ⇐⇒ η r (ρ) ⊑r ρ♯
The Classical Design To contrast with Cousot’s original design
using classical abstract interpretation, the key difference is again
the abstraction function. The abstraction function using classical
Galois connections is:
A♯ [ ] : aexp → env♯ → Z♯
αr (R) := λx.αz ({ρ(x) | ρ ∈ R})
αr : ℘(env) → env♯
which is also not amenable to mechanized verification.
To induce a spec for A♯ , we first revisit the concrete semantics
relation as a powerset-valued function, which we call A:
Abstracting Functions After designing constructive Galois connections for Z and env we define what it means for J K♯a , some abstract denotation for arithmetic operators, to be a sound abstraction
of J Ka , its concrete counterpart. This is done through a specification induced by mappings η and µ, analogously to how specifications are induced using classical Galois connections.
A[ ] : aexp → env → ℘(Z)
A[ae](ρ) := {i | ρ ⊢ ae ⇓a i}
The induced spec for A♯ is generated with the monadic bind operator, which we notate using Moggi’s star notation ∗ :
pure(η z )∗ (A[ae]∗ (µr (ρ♯ ))) ⊆ pure(A♯ [ae])(ρ♯ )
9
Case ae = rand:
z
r
-- Agda Calculation of Case ae = x:
♯
a
α[A] (Var x) ρ♯ = [proof-mode]
{η (i) | ρ ∈ µ (ρ ) ∧ ρ ⊢ rand ⇓ i}
z
r
♯
do [[ (pure · η z ) ∗ · (A[ Var x ] ∗ · (µr · ρ♯)) ]]
a
= {η (i) | ρ ∈ µ (ρ ) ∧ i ∈ Z}
* defn. of ρ ⊢ rand ⇓ i +
⊆ {η z (i) | i ∈ Z}
* ∅ when µr (ρ♯ ) = ∅ +
⊆ {any}
* {any} mon. w.r.t. ⊑z +
, {A♯ [rand](ρ♯ )}
* defining A♯ [rand] +
[focus-right [· ] of (pure · η z ) ∗ ] begin
do [[ A[ Var x ] ∗ · (µr · ρ♯) ]]
* A[Var]/≡ +
[[ (pure · lookup[ x ]) ∗ · (µr · ρ♯) ]]
Case ae = x:
* lookup/µr /≡ +
{η z (i) | ρ ∈ µr (ρ♯ ) ∧ ρ ⊢ x ⇓a i}
[[ µz ∗ · (pure · lookup♯[ x ] · ρ♯) ]]
= {η z (ρ(x)) | ρ ∈ µr (ρ♯ )}
* defn. of ρ ⊢ x ⇓a i +
= {η z (i) | i ∈ µz (ρ♯ (x))}
* defn. of µr (ρ♯ ) +
[[ (pure · η z ) ∗ · (µz ∗ · (pure · lookup♯[ x ] · ρ♯)) ]]
* Eq. CGC-Red +
* reductive[ηµ] +
♯
⊆ {ρ (x)}
♯
♯
end
♯
, {A [x](ρ )}
[[ ret · (lookup♯[ x ] · ρ♯) ]]
* defining A [x] +
[[ pure · A♯[ Num n ] · ρ♯ ]]
Case ae = x (Monadic):
z ∗
r
∗
♯
pure(η ) (A[x] (µ (ρ )))
Figure 4. Constructive GC calculations in Agda
= pure(λρ.η z (ρ(x)))∗ (µr (ρ♯ ))
* defn. of A[x] +
= pure(η z )∗ (µz∗ (ρ♯ (x)))
* defn. of µr (ρ♯ ) +
⊆ ret(ρ♯ (x))
* Eq. CGC-Red +
♯
♯
, pure(A [x])(ρ )
The Classical Design Classically, one first designs a powerset
lifting of the concrete semantics, called a collecting semantics:
A℘ [ ] : aexp → ℘(env) → ℘(Z)
A℘ [ae](R) := {i | ρ ∈ R ∧ ρ ⊢ ae ⇓a }
* defining A♯ [x] +
The classical soundness specification for A♯ [ae](ρ♯ ) is then:
Figure 3. Constructive GC calculations on paper
αz (A℘ [ae](γ r (ρ♯ ))) ⊑ A♯ [ae](ρ♯ )
However, as usual, the abstraction αz cannot be mechanized effectively, preventing a mechanized derivation of A♯ by calculus.
which unfolds to:
{η z (i) | ρ ∈ µr (ρ♯ ) ∧ ρ ⊢ ae ⇓a i} ⊆ {A♯ [ae](ρ♯ )}
5. Case Study: Gradual Type Systems
To calculate A♯ we reason equationally from the spec on the left
towards the singleton set on the right, and declare the result the
definition of A♯ . We do this by case analysis on ae; we show the
cases for ae = rand and ae = x in Figure 3. Each calculation can
also be written in monadic form, which is the style we mechanize;
we repeat the variable case in monadic form in the figure.
Recent work in metatheory for gradual type systems by Garcia
et al. [17] shows how a Galois connection discipline can guide the
design of gradual typing systems. Starting with a Galois connection
between precise and gradual types, both the static and dynamic
semantics of the gradual language are derived systematically. This
technique is called Abstracting Gradual Typing (AGT).
The design presented by Garcia et al is to begin with a precise
type system, like the simply typed lambda calculus, and add a new
type ? which functions as the ⊤ element in the lattice of type precision. The precise typing
rules are presented with meta-operators <:
..
for subtyping and ∨ for the join operator in the subtyping lattice.
The gradual type system is then written using abstract variants <:♯
.. ♯
and ∨ which are proven correct w.r.t. specifications induced by the
Galois connection.
Mechanized Calculation Our Agda calculation of A♯ strongly
resembles the on-paper monadic one. We show the Agda proof
code for abstract variable references in Figure 4. The first line is the
top level definition site for the derivation of A♯ for the Var case.
The proof-mode term is part of our “proof-mode” library which
gives support for calculational reasoning in the form of Agda proof
combinators with mixfix syntax. Statements surrounded by double
square brackets [[e]] restate the current proof state, which Agda will
check is correct. Reasoning steps are employed through *e+ terms,
which transform the proof state from the previous form to the next.
The term [focus-right [· ] of e] focuses the goal to the right of
the outermost application, scoped between begin and end.
Using constructive Galois connections, our mechanized calculation closely follows Cousot’s classical one, uses both η and µ
mappings, and results in a verified, executable static analyzer. Such
a result is not possible using classical Galois connections, due to
the inability to encode α functions constructively.
We complete the full calculation of Cousot’s generic abstract
interpreter for WHILE in Agda as supplemental material to this
paper, where the resulting interpreter is both sound and computable
by construction. We also provide our “proof-mode” library which
supports general calculational reasoning with posets.
The Precise Type System The AGT paper describes two designs
for gradual type systems in increasing complexity. We chose to
mechanize a hybrid of the two which is simple, like the first design, yet still exercises key challenges addressed by the second. We
also made slight modifications to the design at parts to make mechanization easier, but without changing the nature of the system.
The precise type system we mechanized is the simply typed
lambda calculus with booleans, and top and bottom elements for
a subtyping lattice, which we call any and none:
τ ∈ type ::= none | B | τ → τ | any
The first design in the AGT paper does not involve subtyping,
and their second design incorporates record types with width and
depth subtyping. By just focusing on none and any, we exercise
10
Γ ⊢ e 1 : τ1
Γ ⊢ e 2 : τ2
Γ ⊢ e 3 : τ3
Γ♯ ⊢♯ e♯1 : τ1♯
Γ♯ ⊢♯ e♯2 : τ2♯
Γ♯ ⊢♯ e♯3 : τ3♯
τ1 <: B
..
Γ ⊢ if e1 then e2 else e3 : τ1 ∨ τ2
IF
.. ♯
Γ♯ ⊢♯ if e1 then e2 else e3 : τ1♯ ∨ τ2♯
Γ ⊢ e 1 : τ1
τ1 <: τ11 → τ21
Γ ⊢ e 2 : τ2
τ2 <: τ11
A PP
Γ ⊢ e1 (e2 ) : τ21
Γ♯ ⊢♯ e♯1 : τ1♯
Γ♯ ⊢♯ e♯2 : τ2♯
Γ♯ ⊢♯ e♯ : τ1♯
closed(un) =⇒ ⊢ ⌈un⌉ : ?
⊢
♯
♯
♯
♯
♯
♯
♯
♯
τ11
⊑ τ12
∧ τ21
⊑ τ22
=⇒ τ11
→ τ21
⊑ τ12
→ τ22
Just as in our other designs by abstract interpretation, type♯ is
given meaning by an interpretation function µ, which is the constructive analog of a classical concretization (γ) function:
µ : type♯ → ℘(type)
µ(?) := {τ | τ ∈ type}
µ(τ1♯ → τ2♯ ) := {τ1 → τ2 | τ1 ∈ µ(τ1♯ ) ∧ τ2 ∈ µ(τ2♯ )}
The extraction function η is, remarkably, the identity function:
η(τ ) = τ
and the constructive Galois correspondence holds:
τ ∈ µ(τ ♯ ) ⇐⇒ η(τ ) ⊑ τ ♯
.. ♯
hτ1 , τ2 i ∈ µ(τ1♯ , τ2♯ ) ∧ τ3♯ ⊑ η(τ1 ∨ τ2 ) ⇐⇒ τ3♯ ⊑ τ1♯ ∨ τ2♯
Key properties of gradual subtyping and the gradual join operator
is how they operate over the unknown type ?:
? <: τ
τ <: ?
⊑
e♯2
=⇒ ⊢
(EDL)
♯
e♯2
:
τ2♯
∧
τ1♯
⊑
τ2♯
(GG)
Kleisli Galois Connections We summarize Kleisli Galois connections in Figure 7. Kleisli Galois connections are analogous to
classical ones, but with monadic analogs to α and γ, and monadic
identity and composition operators ret and ⊛ in place of the function space identity and composition operators id and ◦.
τ1 ∈ µ(τ1♯ ) ∧ τ2 ∈ µ(τ2♯ ) ∧ τ1 <: τ2 ⇐⇒ τ1♯ <:♯ τ2♯
♯
∧
e♯1
Powerset Monad See Sections 3.1 and 3.3 for the downwardclosure monotonicity property, and monad definitions and notation
for the monotonic powerset monad. The monad operators obey
standard monad laws. We introduce one new operator for monadic
function composition: (g ⊛ f )(x) := g ∗ (f (x)).
Gradual Operators Given the constructive Galois connection between gradual and precise types, we synthesize specifications for
..
abstract analogs of subtyping <: and the subtyping join operator ∨,
.. ♯
and relate them to their abstractions <:♯ and ∨ :
.. ♯
:
τ1♯
Classical Galois Connections We review classical Galois connections in Figure 7. A Galois connection between posets A and
B contains two adjoint functors α and γ which share a correspondence. An equivalent formulation of the correspondence is two unit
equations called extensive and reductive. Abstract interpreters are
sound by over-approximating a specification induced by α and γ.
τ ♯ ∈ {none, B, any}
♯
e♯1
In this section we develop the full metatheory of constructive Galois connection and prove precise claims about their relationship to
classical Galois connections. We develop the metatheory of constructive Galois connections as an adjunction between posets with
powerset-Kleisli adjoint functors. This is in contrast to classical Galois connections which come from an identical setup, but with the
monotonic function space as adjoint functors, as shown in Figure 7.
We connect constructive to classical Galois connections through
an isomorphism between a subset of classical to the entire space of
constructive. To form this isomorphism we introduce an intermediate structure, Kleisli Galois connections, which we show are isomorphic to the classical subset, and isomorphic to constructive ones
using the constructive theorem of choice, as depicted in Figure 8.
♯
And arrow types are monotonic:
♯
♯
6. Constructive Galois Connection Metatheory
τ ⊑τ ⊑?
♯
(FAT)
♯
The partial ordering is reflexive and has ? at the top:
♯
G-C OE
⊢ e : τ ⇐⇒ ⊢♯ e : τ
τ ♯ ∈ type♯ ::= none | B | τ ♯ → τ ♯ | any | ?
..
G-A PP
Gradual Metatheory Using AGT, the gradual type system is a
syntactic analog to the precise one but with gradual types and
operators, which we show in Figure 6. Using this system, and
constructive Galois connections, we mechanize in Agda the key
AGT metatheory results from the paper: equivalence for fullyannotated terms (FAT), embedding of dynamic language terms
(EDL), and gradual guarantee (GG):
Gradual Types The essence of AGT is to design a gradual type
system by abstract interpretation of the precise type system. To do
this, a new top element is added to the precise type system, although
rather than representing the top of the subtyping lattice like any, it
represents the top of the precision lattice, and is notated ?:
η : type → type♯
G-I F
Figure 6. Case Study: gradual type system
the subtyping machinery of their approach without the blowup in
complexity from formalizing record types.
The typing rules in AGT are written in strictly syntax-directed
form, with explicit use of subtyping in rule hypotheses. We show
three precise typing rules for if-statements, application and coercion in Figure 5. The subtyping lattice in the precise system is
the “safe for substitution” lattice, and well typed programs enjoy
progress and preservation.
when
τ1♯ <:♯ τ2♯
Γ♯ ⊢♯ e♯ :: τ2♯ : τ2♯
Figure 5. Case Study: precise type system
µ(τ ♯ ) := τ ♯
♯
♯
τ1♯ <:♯ τ11
→ τ21
♯
♯ ♯
τ2 <: τ11
♯
Γ♯ ⊢ e♯1 (e♯2 ) : τ21
Γ ⊢ e : τ1
τ1 <: τ2
C OE
Γ ⊢ e :: τ2 : τ2
♯
τ1♯ <:♯ B
Kleisli to Classical and Back All Kleisli Galois connections
hκα, κγi between A and B can be lifted to recover a classical Galois connection hα, γi between ℘(A) and ℘(B) through a monadic
♯ .. ♯
?∨ τ =τ ∨ ?=?
11
Adjunction
Category
Adjoints
LAdjoint
RAdjoint
Corr
Extensive
Reductive
Soundness
Optimality
Classical GCs
Posets
Mono. Functions
α:A →B
γ:B →A
id(x) ⊑ γ(y)
⇔ α(x) ⊑ id(y)
id ⊑ γ ◦ α
α ◦ γ ⊑ id
α ◦ f ◦ γ ⊑ f♯
α ◦ f ◦ γ = f♯
Kleisli/constructive GCs
Posets
℘-Monadic Functions
κα : A → ℘(B)
κγ : B → ℘(A)
ret(x) ⊆ κγ(y)
⇔ κα(x) ⊆ ret(y)
ret ⊑ κγ ⊛ κα
κα ⊛ κγ ⊑ ret
κα ⊛ f ⊛ κγ ⊑ f ♯
κα ⊛ f ⊛ κγ = f ♯
Computational
Constructive
Kleisli
Classical
Set inclusion
Theorem of choice
Figure 8. Relationship between classical, Kleisli and constructive
Lemma 1 (CGC-Induce).AGDAX For every Kleisli Galois connection hκα, κγi, there exists a constructive Galois connection hη, µi
where hpure(η), µi = hκα, κγi.
Figure 7. Comparison of constructive v classical adjunctions
Because the mapping from Kleisli to constructive is interesting we provide a proof, which to our knowledge is novel. The
proof builds a constructive Galois connection hη, µi from a Kleisli
hκα, κγi by exploiting the Kleisli correspondence and making use
of the constructive theorem of choice.
lifting operator on Kleisli Galois connections hκα, κγi∗ :
hα, γi = hκα, κγi∗ = hκα∗ , κγ ∗ i
This lifting is sound, meaning Kleisli soundness and optimality
results can be translated to classical ones.
Proof. To turn an arbitrary Kleisli Galois connection into a constructive one, we show that the effect on κα : A → ℘(B) is benign,
or in other words, that there exists some η such that κα = pure(η).
We prove this using two ingredients: a constructive interpretation of
the Kleisli extensive law, and the constructive theorem of choice.
We first expand the Kleisli expansive property, unfolding definitions of ⊛ and ret, to get an equivalent logical statement:
Theorem 1 (KGC-Sound). AGDAX For any Kleisli relationship of
soundness between f and f ♯ , that is κα ⊛ f ⊛ κγ ⊑ f ♯ , its
lifting to classical is also sound, that is α ◦ f ∗ ◦ γ ⊑ f ♯∗ where
hα, γi = hκα, κγi∗ , and likewise for optimality relationships.
This lifting is also complete, meaning classical Galois connection soundness and optimality results can always be translated to
Kleisli ones, when α and γ are of lifted form.
∀x.∃y.y ∈ κα(x) ∧ x ∈ κγ(y)
(KGC-Exp)
Statements of this form can be used in conjunction with an axiom
of choice in classical mathematics, which is:
Theorem 2 (KGC-Complete).AGDAX For any classical relationship
of soundness between f ∗ and f ♯∗ , that is α ◦ f ∗ ◦ γ ⊑ f ♯∗ , its
lowering to Kleisli is also sound when hα, γi = hκα, κγi∗ , that is
κα ⊛ f ⊛ κγ ⊑ f ♯ , and likewise for optimality relationships.
(∀x.∃y.R(x, y)) =⇒ (∃f.∀x.R(x, f (x)))
(AxChoice)
This theorem is admitted as an axiom in classical mathematics,
but in constructive logic—the setting used for extracting verified
algorithms–(AxChoice)is definable as a theorem, due to the computational interpretation of logical connectives ∀ and ∃. We define
(AxChoice) as a theorem in Agda without trouble:
Due to soundness and completeness, one can work with the simpler setup of Kleisli Galois connections without any loss of generality. The setup is simpler because Kleisli Galois connection theorems only quantify over individual elements rather than elements of
powersets. For example, the soundness criteria κα ⊛ f ⊛ κγ ⊑ f ♯
is proved by showing κα∗ (f ∗ (κγ(x))) ⊆ f ♯ (x) for an arbitrary
element x : A, whereas in the classical proof one must show
κα∗ (f ∗ (κγ ∗ (X))) ⊆ f ♯∗ (X) for arbitrary sets X : ℘(A).
choice : ∀{A B}{R : A → B → Set}
→ (∀ x → ∃ y st R x y)
→ (∃ f st ∀ x → R x (f x))
choice P = ∃ (λ x → π1 (P x)) , (λ x → π2 (P x))
Constructive Galois Connections Constructive Galois connections are a restriction of Kleisli Galois connections where the abstraction mapping is a pure rather than monadic function. We call
the left adjoint extraction, notated η, and the right adjoint interpretation, notated µ. The constructive Galois connection correspondence, alternative expansive and reductive formulation of the correspondence, and soundness and optimality criteria are identical to
Kleisli Galois connections where hκα, κγi = hpure(η), µi.
Applying (AxChoice) to (KGC-Exp) then gives:
∃η.∀x.η(x) ∈ κα(x) ∧ x ∈ κγ(η(x))
(ExpChioce)
which proves the existence of a pure function η : A → B.
In order to form a constructive Galois connection η and µ must
satisfy the correspondence, which we prove in split form:
x ∈ µ(η(x))
x ∈ µ(y) =⇒ η(x) ⊑ y
Constructive to Kleisli and Back Our main theorem which justifies the soundness and completeness of constructive Galois connections is an isomorphism between constructive and Kleisli Galois
connections. The easy direction is soundness, where a Kleisli Galois connection is formed by defining hκα, κγi = hpure(η), µi.
Soundness and optimality theorems are then lifted from constructive to Kleisli without modification.
(CGC-Exp)
(CGC-Red)
The expansive property is immediate from the second conjunct
in (ExpChioce). The reductive property follows from the Kleisli
reductive property:
x ∈ κγ(y) ∧ y ′ ∈ κα(x) =⇒ y ′ ⊑ y
(KGC-Red)
The constructive variant of reductive is proved by satisfying the first
two premises of (KGC-Red), where x ∈ κγ(y) is by assumption
and y ′ ∈ κα(x) is by the first conjunct in (ExpChioce).
So far we have shown that for a Kleisli Galois connection
hκα, κγi, there exists a constructive Galois connection hη, µi
where µ = κγ. However, we have yet to show pure(η) = κα.
To show this, we prove an analog of a standard result for classical
Galois connections: that α and γ uniquely determine each other.
Theorem 3 (CGC-Sound).AGDAX For any constructive relationship
of soundness between f and f ♯ , that is pure(η) ⊛ f ⊛ µ ⊑ f ♯ ,
its lifting to classical is sound, that is κα ⊛ f ⊛ κγ ⊑ f ♯ where
hκα, κγi = hpure(η), µi, and likewise for optimality relationships.
The other direction, completeness, is much more surprising.
First we establish a lowering for Kleisli Galois connections.
12
Lemma 2 (Unique Abstraction).AGDAX For any two Kleisli Galois
connections hκα1 , κγ1 i and hκα2 , κγ2 i, κα1 = κα2 iff κγ1 = κγ2
Deductive Synthesis Fiat [16] is a library for the Coq proof assistant which supports semi-automated synthesis of programs as refinements of their specifications. Fiat uses the same powerset type
and monad as we do, and their “deductive synthesis” process similarly derives correct-by-construction programs by calculus. Fiat
derivations start with a user-defined specification and calculate towards an under-approximation (⊒), whereas calculational abstract
interpretation starts with an optimal specification and calculates towards an over-approximation (⊑). It should be possible to generalize their framework to use partial orders to recover aspects of
our work, or to invert the lattice used in our abstract interpretation
framework to recover aspects of theirs. A notable difference in approach is that Fiat makes heavy use of Coq’s tactic programming
language to automate rewrites inside respectful contexts, whereas
our system provides no interactive proof automation and each calculational step must be justified explicitly.
We then conclude pure(η) = κα as a consequence of the above
lemma and the fact that µ = κγ.
Given the above mapping from Kleisli Galois connections to
constructive ones, we prove the completeness of this mapping.
Theorem 4 (CGC-Complete).AGDAX For any Kleisli relationship of
soundness between f and f ♯ , that is κα⊛f ⊛κγ ⊑ f ♯ , its lowering
to constructive is also sound, that is pure(η) ⊛ f ⊛ µ ⊑ f ♯ where
hη, µi is induced, and likewise for optimality relationships.
Mechanization We mechanize the metatheory for constructive
Galois connections and both case studies from Sections 4 and 5
in Agda, as well as a general purpose proof library for posets and
calculational reasoning with the monotonic powerset monad. The
development is available at: github.com/plum-umd/cgc.
Monadic Abstract Interpretation Monads in abstract interpretation have recently been applied to good effect for modularity [15,
31]. However, that work uses monads to structure the semantics,
not the Galois connections and proofs.
Wrapping Up In this section we showed that constructive Galois
connections are sound w.r.t. classical Galois connections, and complete w.r.t. the subset of classical Galois connections recovered by
lifting constructive ones. We showed this by introducing an intermediate space of Galois connections, Kleisli Galois connections,
and by establishing two sets of isomorphisms between a subset
of classical and Kleisli, and between Kleisli and constructive. The
proof of isomorphism between constructive and Kleisli yielded an
interesting proof which applies the constructive theorem of choice
to one of the Kleisli Galois connection correspondence laws.
Future Directions Now that we have established a foundation
for constructive Galois connection calculation, we see value in
verifying larger derivations (e.g. [23, 30]). Furthermore we would
like to explore whether or not our techniques have any benefit in
the space of general-purpose program calculations à la Bird.
Currently our framework requires the user to justify every detail of the program calculation, including monotonicity proofs and
proof scoping for rewrites inside monotonic contexts. We imagine
much of this can be automated, requiring the user to only provide
the interesting parts of the proof, à la Fiat[16]. Our experience has
been that even Coq’s tactic system slows down considerably when
automating all of these details, and we foresee using proof by reflection in either Coq (e.g. Rtac [20]) or Agda to automate these
proofs in a way that maintains proof-checker performance.
There have been recent developments on compositional abstract
interpretation frameworks [15] where abstract interpreters and their
proofs of soundness are systematically derived side-by-side. That
framework relies on correctness properties transported by Galois
transformers, which we posit would benefit from mechanization
since they hold both computational and specification content.
7. Related Work
This work connects two long strands of research: abstract interpretation via Galois connections and mechanized verification via
dependently typed functional programming. The former is founded
on the pioneering work of Cousot and Cousot [11, 12]; the latter on
that of Martin-Löf [21], embodied in Norell’s Agda [28]. Our key
technical insight is to use a monadic structure for Galois connections, following the example of Moggi [25] for the λ-calculus.
Calculational Abstract Interpretation Cousot describes calculational abstract interpretation by example in his lecture notes [9] and
monograph [8], and recently introduced a unifying calculus for Galois connections [14]. Our work mechanizes Cousot’s calculations
and provides a foundation for mechanizing other instances of calculational abstract interpretation (e.g. [22, 30]). We expect our work
to have applications to the mechanization of calculational program
design [2, 3] by employing only Galois retractions, i.e. α ◦ γ is an
identity [14]. There is prior work on mechanized program calculation [33], but it is not based on abstract interpretation.
8. Conclusions
This paper realizes the vision of mechanized and constructive Galois connections foreshadowed by Cousot [8, p. 85], giving the first
mechanically verified proof by calculational abstract interpretation;
once for his generic static analyzer and once for the semantics of
gradual typing. Our proofs by calculus closely follow the originals.
The primary discrepancy is the use of monads to isolate specification effects. By maintaining this discipline, we are able to verify calculations by Galois connections and extract computational content
from pure results. The resulting artifacts are correct-by-verifiedconstruction, thereby avoiding known bugs in the original.2
Verified Static Analyzers Verified abstract interpretation has
many promising results [1, 5, 6, 29], scaling up to large-scale realworld static analyzers [18]. However, mechanized abstract interpretation has yet to benefit from the Galois connection framework.
Until now, approaches use classical axioms or “γ-only” encodings of soundness and (sometimes) completeness. Our techniques
for mechanizing Galois connections should complement these approaches.
Acknowledgments
We thank Ron Garcia and Éric Tanter for discussions of their work.
Éric also helped with our French translation. We thank the Colony
Club in D.C. and the Board & Brew in College Park for providing
fruitful environments in which to work. We thank the anonymous
reviewers of ICFP 2016 for their helpful feedback. This material is
partially based on research sponsored by DARPA under agreement
number AFRL FA8750-15-2-0104.
Galculator The Galculator [32] is a proof assistant founded on
an algebra of Galois connections. This tool is similar to ours in
that it mechanically verifies Galois connection calculations. Our
approach is more general, supporting arbitrary set-theoretic reasoning and embedded within a general purpose proof assistant, however their approach is fully automated for the small set of derivations which reside within their supported theory.
2 di.ens.fr/~cousot/aisoftware/Marktoberdorf98/Bug History
13
References
the 42Nd Annual ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles
of Programming Languages, POPL 2015. ACM, 2015.
[1] G. Barthe, D. Pichardie, and T. Rezk. A certified lightweight noninterference java bytecode verifier. In R. D. Nicola, editor, Programming Languages and Systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.
Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007.
[2] R. Bird and O. de Moor. The Algebra of Programming. Prentice Hall,
1996.
[3] R. S. Bird. A calculus of functions for program derivation. In D. A.
Turner, editor, Research Topics in Functional Programming. AddisonWesley, 1990. Also available as Technical Monograph PRG-64, from
the Programming Research Group, Oxford University.
[4] B. Blanchet, P. Cousot, R. Cousot, J. Feret, L. Mauborgne, A. Miné,
D. Monniaux, and X. Rival. A static analyzer for large safety-critical
software. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, PLDI ’03. ACM,
2003.
[17] R. Garcia, A. M. Clark, and É. Tanter. Abstracting gradual typing.
In Proceedings of the 43rd ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on
Principles of Programming Languages (POPL 2016), St Petersburg,
FL, USA, Jan. 2016. ACM Press. To appear.
[18] J. H. Jourdan, V. Laporte, S. Blazy, X. Leroy, and D. Pichardie. A
Formally-Verified c static analyzer. In Proceedings of the 42Nd Annual
ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming
Languages, POPL ’15. ACM, 2015.
[19] X. Leroy. Formal verification of a realistic compiler. Commun. ACM,
2009.
[20] G. Malecha and J. Bengtson. Extensible and efficient automation
through reflective tactics. In Programming Languages and Systems
- 25th European Symposium on Programming, ESOP 2016. Springer,
2016.
[21] P. Martin-Löf. Intuitionistic Type Theory. Bibliopolis, 1984.
[22] J. Midtgaard and T. Jensen. A calculational approach to Control-Flow
analysis by abstract interpretation. In M. Alpuente and G. Vidal, editors, Static Analysis, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, chapter 23.
Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2008.
[5] S. Blazy, V. Laporte, A. Maroneze, and D. Pichardie. Formal verification of a c value analysis based on abstract interpretation. In F. Logozzo and M. Fähndrich, editors, Static Analysis, Lecture Notes in
Computer Science. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013.
[6] D. Cachera and D. Pichardie. A certified denotational abstract interpreter. In M. Kaufmann and L. Paulson, editors, Interactive Theorem
Proving, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010.
[7] P.
Cousot.
Abstract
interpretation.
URL
http://www.di.ens.fr/~ cousot/AI/.
[23] J. Midtgaard and T. Jensen. A calculational approach to ControlFlow analysis by abstract interpretation. In M. Alpuente and G. Vidal,
editors, Static Analysis Symposium, LNCS. Springer, 2008.
[24] A. Miné. The octagon abstract domain. Higher-Order and Symbolic
Computation, 2006.
[25] E. Moggi. An abstract view of programming languages. Technical
report, Edinburgh University, 1989.
[8] P. Cousot. The calculational design of a generic abstract interpreter. In
M. Broy and R. Steinbrüggen, editors, Calculational System Design.
NATO ASI Series F. IOS Press, Amsterdam, 1999.
[26] D. Monniaux. Réalisation mécanisée d’interpréteurs abstraits. Rapport de DEA, Université Paris VII, 1998. French.
[27] F. Nielson, H. R. Nielson, and C. Hankin. Principles of Program
Analysis. Springer-Verlag, 1999.
[9] P. Cousot. MIT 16.399: Abstract interpretation, 2005.
[10] P. Cousot and R. Cousot. Static determination of dynamic properties
of programs. In 2nd International Symposium on Programming, 1976.
[11] P. Cousot and R. Cousot. Abstract interpretation: a unified lattice
model for static analysis of programs by construction or approximation of fixpoints. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM SIGACT-SIGPLAN
Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages. ACM, 1977.
[28] U. Norell. Towards a practical programming language based on
dependent type theory. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, SE-412
96 Göteborg, Sweden, Sept. 2007.
[29] D. Pichardie. Interprétation abstraite en logique intuitionniste: extraction d’analyseurs Java certifiés. PhD thesis, Université Rennes,
2005.
[30] I. Sergey, J. Midtgaard, and D. Clarke. Calculating graph algorithms
for dominance and shortest path. In J. Gibbons and P. Nogueira, editors, Mathematics of Program Construction, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012.
[31] I. Sergey, D. Devriese, M. Might, J. Midtgaard, D. Darais, D. Clarke,
and F. Piessens. Monadic abstract interpreters. In Proceedings of the
34th ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design
and Implementation. ACM, 2013.
[12] P. Cousot and R. Cousot. Systematic design of program analysis
frameworks. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGACT-SIGPLAN Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, POPL ’79. ACM,
1979.
[13] P. Cousot and R. Cousot. Inductive definitions, semantics and abstract
interpretations. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT
Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, POPL ’92.
ACM, 1992.
[14] P. Cousot and R. Cousot. A Galois connection calculus for abstract
interpretation. In Proceedings of the 41st ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT
Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, POPL ’14.
ACM, 2014.
[32] P. F. Silva and J. N. Oliveira. ‘Galculator’: Functional prototype of a
Galois-connection based proof assistant. In Proceedings of the 10th
International ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Principles and Practice
of Declarative Programming, PPDP ’08. ACM, 2008.
[15] D. Darais, M. Might, and D. Van Horn. Galois transformers and modular abstract interpreters. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGPLAN
International Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems,
Languages, and Applications, OOPSLA 2015, pages 552–571. ACM,
2015.
[16] B. Delaware, C. Pit-Claudel, J. Gross, and A. Chlipala. Fiat: Deductive
synthesis of abstract data types in a proof assistant. In Proceedings of
[33] J. Tesson, H. Hashimoto, Z. Hu, F. Loulergue, and M. Takeichi. Program calculation in Coq. In M. Johnson and D. Pavlovic, editors,
Algebraic Methodology and Software Technology, Lecture Notes in
Computer Science, chapter 10. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011.
14
| 6cs.PL
|
Learning-Based Modular Indirect Adaptive Control for a Class of
Nonlinear Systems
Mouhacine Benosman, Amir-massoud Farahmand, Meng Xia
arXiv:1509.07860v1 [cs.SY] 25 Sep 2015
Abstract
We study in this paper the problem of adaptive trajectory tracking control for a class of nonlinear systems
with parametric uncertainties. We propose to use a modular approach, where we first design a robust nonlinear
state feedback which renders the closed loop input-to-state stable (ISS), where the input is considered to be the
estimation error of the uncertain parameters, and the state is considered to be the closed-loop output tracking
error. Next, we augment this robust ISS controller with a model-free learning algorithm to estimate the model
uncertainties. We implement this method with two different learning approaches. The first one is a model-free
multi-parametric extremum seeking (MES) method and the second is a Bayesian optimization-based method called
Gaussian Process Upper Confidence Bound (GP-UCB). The combination of the ISS feedback and the learning
algorithms gives a learning-based modular indirect adaptive controller. We show the efficiency of this approach
on a two-link robot manipulator example.
I. I NTRODUCTION
Classical adaptive methods can be classified into two main approaches; ‘direct approaches’, where the controller
is updated to adapt to the process, and ‘indirect approaches’, where the model is updated to better reflect the
actual process. Many adaptive methods have been proposed over the years for linear and nonlinear systems, we
could not possibly cite here all the design and analysis results that have been reported, instead we refer the
reader to e.g., [1], [2] and the references therein for more details. Of particular interest to us is the indirect
modular approach to adaptive nonlinear control, e.g., [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]. In this
approach, first the controller is designed by assuming that all the parameters are known and then an identifier
is used to guarantee certain boundedness of the estimation error. The identifier is independent of the designed
controller and thus the approach is called ‘modular’. For example, a modular approach has been proposed in [3]
for adaptive neural control of pure-feedback nonlinear systems, where the input-to-state stability (ISS) modularity
of the controller-estimator is achieved and the closed-loop stability is guaranteed by the small-gain theorem (see
also [13], [14]).
Mouhacine Benosman (m [email protected]) is with the Multimedia group of Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories (MERL),
Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. Amir-massoud Farahmand is with the Data Analytics group of MERL. Meng Xia is with the with the
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA (part of this work has been completed
during her internship at MERL).
In this work, we build upon this type of modular adaptive design and provide a framework which combines modelfree learning methods and robust model-based nonlinear control to propose a learning-based modular indirect
adaptive controller, where model-free learning algorithms are used to estimate, in closed-loop, the uncertain
parameters of the model. The main difference with the existing model-based indirect adaptive control methods, is
the fact that we do not use the model to design the uncertainty parameters estimation filters. Indeed, model-based
indirect adaptive controllers are based on parameters estimators designed using the system’s model, e.g., the
X-swapping methods presented in [2], where gradient descent filters obtained using the systems dynamics are
designed to estimate the uncertain parameters. We argue that because we do not use the system’s dynamics to
design uncertainties estimation filters we have less restrictions on the type of uncertainties that we can estimate,
e.g., uncertainties appearing nonlinearly can be estimated with the proposed approach, see [5] for some earlier
results on a mechatronics application. We also show here that with the proposed approach we can estimate at the
same time a vector of linearly dependent uncertainties, a case which cannot be straightforwardly solved using
model-based filters, e.g., refer to [15] where it is shown that the X-swapping model-based method fails to estimate
a vector of linearly dependent model coefficients. In this work, we implement the proposed approach with two
different model-free learning algorithms: The first one is a dither-based MES algorithm, and the second one is
a Bayesian optimization-based method called GP-UCB. The latter solves the exploration-exploitation problem in
the continuous armed bandit problem, which is a non-associative reinforcement learning (RL) setting. Indeed,
MES is a model-free control approach with well known convergence properties, since it has been analyzed in
many papers, e.g., [16], [17], [16], [18], [19]. This makes MES a good candidate for the model-free estimation
part of our modular adaptive controller, as already shown in some of our preliminary results in [7], [8], [10].
However, one of the main limitations with dither-based MES is the convergence to local minima. To improve
this part of the controller, we introduce here another model-free learning algorithm in the estimation part of the
adaptive controller. Indeed, we propose in this paper to use a reinforcement learning algorithm based on Bayesian
optimization methods, known as GP-UCB, e.g., [20], which contrary to the MES algorithm is guaranteed to reach
the global minima in a finite search space.
One point worth mentioning at this stage is that comparatively to‘pure’ model-free controllers, e.g., pure MES
or model-free RL algorithms, the proposed control here has a different goal. Indeed, the available model-free
controllers are meant for output or state regulation, i.e., solving a static optimization problem. In the contrary,
here we propose to use model-free learning to complement a model-based nonlinear control to estimate the
unknown parameters of the model, which means that the control goal, i.e., state or output trajectory tracking is
handled by the model-based controller. The learning algorithm is used to improve the tracking performance of
the model-based controller, and once the learning algorithm has converged, one can carry on using the nonlinear
model-based feedback controller alone, i.e., without the need of the learning algorithm. Furthermore, due to the
fact that we are merging together a model-based control with a model-free learning algorithm, we believe that this
type of controller can converge faster to an optimal performance, comparatively to the pure model-free controller,
since by ‘partly’ using a model-based controller, we are taking advantage of the partial information given by the
physics of the system, whereas the pure model-free algorithms assume no knowledge about the system, and thus
start the search for an optimal control signal from scratch.
Similar ideas of merging model-based control and MES has been proposed in [12], [21], [22], [4], [5], [6], [7],
[8], [10]. For instance in [12], [21] extremum seeking is used to complement a model-based controller, under
linearity of the model assumption in [12] (in the direct adaptive control setting, where the controllers gains
are estimated), or in the indirect adaptive control setting, under the assumption of linear parametrization of the
control in terms of the uncertainties in [21]. The modular design idea of using a model-based controller with ISS
guaranty, complemented with an MES-based module can be found in [5], [6], [7], [8], [10], where the MES was
used to estimate the model parameters and in [4], [23], where feedback gains were tuned using MES algorithms.
The work of this paper falls in this class of ISS-based modular indirect adaptive controllers. The difference with
other MES-based adaptive controllers is that, due to the ISS modular design we can use any model-free learning
algorithm to estimate the model uncertainties, not necessarily extremum seeking-based. To emphasis this we show
here the performance of the controller when using a type of RL-based learning algorithm as well.
The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In Section II, we present some notations, and fundamental definitions
that will be needed in the sequel. In Section III, we formulate the problem. The nominal controller design are
presented in Section IV. In Section IV-B, a robust controller is designed which guarantees ISS from the estimation
error input to the tracking error state. In Section IV-C, the ISS controller is complemented with an MES algorithm
to estimate the model parametric uncertainties. In section IV-D, we introduce the RL GP-UCB algorithm as a
model-free learning to complement the ISS controller. Section V is dedicated to an application example and the
paper conclusion is given in Section VI.
II. P RELIMINARIES
Throughout the paper, we use k · k to denote the Euclidean norm; i.e., for a vector x ∈ Rn , we have kxk ,
√
kxk2 = xT x, where xT denotes the transpose of the vector x. We denote by Card(S) the size of a finite set
qP P
n
n
2
S . The Frobenius norm of a matrix A ∈ Rm×n , with elements aij , is defined as kAkF ,
i=1
j=1 |aij | .
Given x ∈ Rm , the signum function is defined as sign(x) , [sign(x1 ), sign(x2 ), · · · , sign(xm )]T , where
sign(.) denotes the classical signum function. We use f˙ to denote the time derivative of f and f (r) (t) for the
r -th derivative of f (t), i.e. f (r) ,
dr f
dt .
We denote by Ck , functions that are k times differentiable and by C∞ , a
smooth function. A continuous function α : [0, a) → [0, ∞) is said to belong to class K if it is strictly increasing
and α(0) = 0. It is said to belong to class K∞ if a = ∞ and α(r) → ∞ as r → ∞ [24]. A continuous function
β : [0, a) × [0, ∞) → [0, ∞) is said to belong to class KL if, for a fixed s, the mapping β(r, s) belongs to class
K with respect to r and, for each fixed r , the mapping β(r, s) is decreasing with respect to s and β(r, s) → 0
as s → ∞ [24].
Next, We introduce some definitions that will be used in the sequel, e.g. [24]: Consider the system
ẋ = f (t, x, u)
(1)
where f : [0, ∞) × Rn × Rm → Rn is piecewise continuous in t and locally Lipschitz in x and u, uniformly in
t. The input u(t) is piecewise continuous, bounded function of t for all t ≥ 0.
Definition 1 ([24], [25]): The system (1) is said to be input-to-sate stable (ISS) if there exist a class KL
function β and a class K function γ such that for any initial state x(t0 ) and any bounded input u(t), the solution
x(t) exists for all t ≥ t0 and satisfies
kx(t)k ≤ β(kx(t0 )k, t − t0 ) + γ( sup ku(τ )k).
t0 ≤τ ≤t
Theorem 1 ([24], [25]): Let V : [0, ∞) × Rn → R be a continuously differentiable function such that
α1 (kxk) ≤V (t, x) ≤ α2 (kxk)
∂V
∂V
+
f (t, x, u) ≤ −W (x),
∂t
∂x
∀kxk ≥ ρ(kuk) > 0
(2)
for all (t, x, u) ∈ [0, ∞) × Rn × Rm , where α1 , α2 are class K∞ functions, ρ is a class K function, and W (x)
is a continuous positive definite function on Rn . Then, the system (1) is input-to-state stable (ISS).
Remark 1: Note that other equivalent definitions for ISS have been given in [25, pp. 1974-1975]. For instance,
Theorem 1 holds if inequality (2) is replaced by
∂V
∂V
+
f (t, x, u) ≤ −µ(kxk) + Ω(kuk)
∂t
∂x
where µ ∈ K∞
T
C 1 and Ω ∈ K∞ .
III. P ROBLEM F ORMULATION
A. Nonlinear system model
We consider here affine uncertain nonlinear systems of the form
ẋ = f (x) + ∆f (t, x) + g(x)u,
(3)
y = h(x),
where x ∈ Rn , u ∈ Rp , y ∈ Rm (p ≥ m), represent the state, the input and the controlled output vectors,
respectively. ∆f (t, x) is a vector field representing additive model uncertainties. The vector fields f , ∆f , columns
of g and function h satisfy the following assumptions.
Assumption A1 The function f : Rn → Rn and the columns of g : Rn → Rp are C∞ vector fields on a bounded
set X of Rn and h : Rn → Rm is a C∞ vector on X . The vector field ∆f (x) is C1 on X .
Assumption A2 System (3) has a well-defined (vector) relative degree {r1 , r2 , · · · , rm } at each point x0 ∈ X ,
P
and the system is linearizable, i.e., m
i=1 ri = n.
Assumption A3 The desired output trajectories yid (1 ≤ i ≤ m) are smooth functions of time, relating desired
initial points yid (0) at t = 0 to desired final points yid (tf ) at t = tf .
B. Control objectives
Our objective is to design a state feedback adaptive controller such that the output tracking error is uniformly
bounded, whereas the tracking error upper-bound is function of the uncertain parameters estimation error, which
can be decreased by the model-free learning. We stress here that the goal of learning algorithm is not stabilization
but rather performance optimization, i.e., the learning improves the parameters estimation error, which in turn
improves the output tracking error. To achieve this control objective, we proceed as follows: First, we design
a robust controller which can guarantee input-to-state stability (ISS) of the tracking error dynamics w.r.t the
estimation errors input. Then, we combine this controller with a model-free learning algorithm to iteratively
estimate the uncertain parameters, by optimizing online a desired learning cost function.
IV. A DAPTIVE C ONTROLLER D ESIGN
A. Nominal Controller
Let us first consider the system under nominal conditions, i.e., when ∆f (t, x) = 0. In this case, it is well
know, e.g., [24], that system (3) can be written as
y (r) (t) = b(ξ(t)) + A(ξ(t))u(t),
(4)
where
(r )
(r )
(rm )
y (r) (t) = [y1 1 (t), y2 2 (t), · · · , ym
(t)]T ,
ξ(t) = [ξ 1 (t), · · · , ξ m (t)]T ,
(ri −1)
ξ i (t) = [yi (t), · · · , yi
(t)],
(5)
1≤i≤m
The functions b(ξ), A(ξ) can be written as functions of f , g and h, and A(ξ) is non-singular in X̃ , where X̃
is the image of the set of X by the diffeomorphism x → ξ between the states of system (3) and the linearized
model (4). Now, to deal with the uncertain model, we first need to introduce one more assumption on system
(3).
Assumption A4 The additive uncertainties ∆f (t, x) in (3) appear as additive uncertainties in the input-output
linearized model (4)-(5) as follows (see also [26])
y (r) (t) = b(ξ(t)) + A(ξ(t))u(t) + ∆b(t, ξ(t)),
where ∆b(t, ξ) is C1 w.r.t. the state vector ξ ∈ X̃ .
(6)
Remark 2: Assumption A4, can be ensured under the so-called matching conditions ([27], p. 146).
It is well known that the nominal model (4) can be easily transformed into a linear input-output mapping.
Indeed, we can first define a virtual input vector v(t) as
v(t) = b(ξ(t)) + A(ξ(t))u(t).
(7)
Combining (4) and (7), we can obtain the following input-output mapping
y (r) (t) = v(t).
(8)
Based on the linear system (8), it is straightforward to design a stabilizing controller for the nominal system (4)
as
un = A−1 (ξ) [vs (t, ξ) − b(ξ)] ,
(9)
where vs is a m × 1 vector and the i-th (1 ≤ i ≤ m) element vsi is given by
(r )
(ri −1)
vsi = yidi − Krii (yi
(r −1)
− yidi
) − · · · − K1i (yi − yid ).
(10)
If we denote the tracking error as ei (t) , yi (t) − yid (t), we obtain the following tracking error dynamics
(ri )
ei
(t) + Krii e(ri −1) (t) + · · · + K1i ei (t) = 0,
(11)
where i ∈ {1, 2, · · · , m}. By properly selecting the gains Kji where i ∈ {1, 2, · · · , m} and j ∈
{1, 2, · · · , ri }, we can obtain global asymptotic stability of the tracking errors ei (t). To formalize this condition,
we add the following assumption.
Assumption A5 There exists a non-empty set A where Kji ∈ A such that the polynomials in (11) are Hurwitz,
where i ∈ {1, 2, · · · , m} and j ∈ {1, 2, · · · , ri }.
(ri −1)
To this end, we define z = [z 1 , z 2 , · · · , z m ]T , where z i = [ei , e˙i , · · · , ei
] and i ∈ {1, 2, · · · , m}.
Then, from (11), we can obtain
ż = Ãz,
where à ∈ Rn×n is a diagonal block matrix given by
à = diag{Ã1 , Ã2 , · · · , Ãm },
and Ãi (1 ≤ i ≤ m) is a ri × ri matrix given by
0
1
0
Ãi =
0
..
.
−K1i
−K2i
(12)
1
..
.
1
···
···
−Krii
.
As discussed above, the gains Kji can be chosen such that the matrix à is Hurwitz. Thus, there exists a positive
definite matrix P > 0 such that (see e.g. [24])
ÃT P + P Ã = − I.
(13)
In the next section, we build upon the nominal controller (9) to write a robust ISS controller.
B. Lyapunov reconstruction-based ISS Controller
We now consider the uncertain model (3), i.e., when ∆f (t, x) 6= 0. The corresponding exact linearized model
is given by (6) where ∆b(t, ξ(t)) 6= 0. The global asymptotic stability of the error dynamics (11) cannot be
guaranteed anymore due to the additive uncertainty ∆b(t, ξ(t)). We use Lyapunov reconstruction techniques to
design a new controller so that the tracking error is guaranteed to be bounded given that the estimate error of
∆b(t, ξ(t)) is bounded. The new controller for the uncertain model (6) is defined as
uf = un + ur ,
(14)
where the nominal controller un is given by (9) and the robust controller ur will be given later. By using the
controller (14), and (6) we obtain
y (r) (t) = b(ξ(t)) + A(ξ(t))uf + ∆b(t, ξ(t)),
= b(ξ(t)) + A(ξ(t))un + A(ξ(t))ur + ∆b(t, ξ(t)),
= vs (t, ξ) + A(ξ(t))ur + ∆b(t, ξ(t)),
(15)
where (15) holds from (9). Which leads to the following error dynamics
ż = Ãz + B̃δ,
(16)
where à is defined in (12), δ is a m × 1 vector given by
δ = A(ξ(t))ur + ∆b(t, ξ(t)),
and the matrix B̃ ∈ Rn×m is given by
B̃1
B̃2
B̃ =
..
.
B̃m
(17)
,
where each B̃i (1 ≤ i ≤ m) is given by a ri × m matrix such that
1
for l = ri , q = i
B̃i (l, q) =
0
otherwise.
(18)
If we choose V (z) = z T P z as a Lyapunov function for the dynamics (16), where P is the solution of the
Lyapunov equation (13), we obtain
V̇ (t) =
∂V
ż,
∂z
= z T (ÃT P + P Ã)z + 2z T P B̃δ,
= − kzk2 + 2z T P B̃δ,
(19)
where δ given by (17) depends on the robust controller ur .
Next, we design the controller ur based on the form of the uncertainties ∆b(t, ξ(t)). More specifically, we
consider here the case when ∆b(t, ξ(t)) is of the following form
∆b(t, ξ(t)) = E Q(ξ, t),
(20)
where E ∈ Rm×m is a matrix of unknown constant parameters, and Q(ξ, t) : Rn × R → Rm is a known bounded
function of sates and time variables. For notational convenience, we denote by Ê(t) the estimate of E , and by
2
eE = E − Ê , the estimate error. We define the unknown parameter vector ∆ = [E(1, 1), ..., E(m, m)]T ∈ Rm ,
b
i.e., concatenation of all elements of E , its estimate is denoted by ∆(t)
= [Ê(1, 1), ..., Ê(m, m)]T , and the
b .
estimation error vector is given by e∆ (t) = ∆ − ∆(t)
Next, we propose the following robust controller
b
ur = − A−1 (ξ)[B̃ T P zkQ(ξ, t)k2 + E(t)Q(ξ,
t)].
(21)
ż = f˜(t, z, e∆ ),
(22)
The closed-loop error dynamics can be written as
where e∆ (t) is considered to be an input to the system (22).
Theorem 2: Consider the system (3), under Assumptions A1-A5, where ∆b(t, ξ(t)) satisfies (20). If we apply
to (3) the feedback controller (14), where un is given by (9) and ur is given by (21). Then, the closed-loop
2
system (22) is ISS from the estimation errors input e∆ (t) ∈ Rm to the tracking errors state z(t) ∈ Rn .
Proof: By substitution (21) into (17), we obtain
b Q(ξ, t) + ∆b(t, ξ(t))
δ = − B̃ T P zkQ(ξ, t)k2 − E(t)
b Q(ξ, t) + E Q(ξ, t),
= − B̃ T P zkQ(ξ, t)k2 − E(t)
If we consider V (z) = z T P z as a Lyapunov function for the error dynamics (16). Then, from (19), we obtain
b Q(ξ, t)
V̇ ≤ − kzk2 + 2z T P B̃E Q(ξ, t) − 2z T P B̃ E(t)
− 2kz T P B̃k2 kQ(ξ, t)k2 ,
which leads to
V̇ ≤ − kzk2 + 2z T P B̃eE Q(ξ, t) − 2kz T P B̃k2 kQ(ξ, t)k2 .
Since z T P B̃eE Q(ξ) ≤ kz T P B̃eE Q(ξ)k ≤ kz T P B̃kkeE kF kQ(ξ)k = kz T P B̃kke∆ kkQ(ξ)k, we obtain
V̇ ≤ − kzk2 + 2kz T P B̃kke∆ kkQ(ξ, t)k − 2kz T P B̃k2 kQ(ξ, t)k2
1
1
≤ − kzk2 − 2(kz T P B̃kkQ(ξ, t)k − ke∆ k)2 + ke∆ k2
2
2
1
2
2
≤ − kzk + ke∆ k .
2
Thus, we have the following relation
1
V̇ ≤ − kzk2 ,
2
∀kzk ≥ ke∆ k > 0,
Then from the Lyapunov direct theorem in [24], [25], we obtain that system (22) is ISS from input e∆ to state
z.
C. MES-based parametric uncertainties estimation
Let us define now the following cost function
b = F (z(∆)),
b
J(∆)
(23)
where F : Rn → R, F (0) = 0, F (z) > 0 for z ∈ Rn − {0}. We need the following assumptions on J .
b ∗ = ∆.
Assumption A6 The cost function J has a local minimum at ∆
b are
Assumption A7 The initial error e∆ (t0 ) is sufficiently small, i.e., the original parameter estimate vector ∆
close enough to the actual parameter vector ∆.
Assumption A8 The cost function J is analytic and its variation with respect to the uncertain parameters is
˜ ≤ ξ2 , ξ2 > 0, ∆
˜ ∈ V(∆
b ∗ ), where V(∆
b ∗ ) denotes a compact
b ∗ , i.e., k ∂J (∆)k
bounded in the neighborhood of ∆
b
∂∆
b ∗.
neighborhood of ∆
We can now present the following result.
Lemma 3: Consider the system (3), under Assumptions A1-A8, where the uncertainty is given by (20). If we
apply to (3) the feedback controller (14), where un is given by (9), ur is given by (21), the cost function is given
b
by (23), and ∆(t)
are estimated through the ES algorithm
π
b ai > 0,
x̃˙ i = ai sin(ωi t + )J(∆),
2
b i (t) = x̃i + ai sin(ωi t − π ), i ∈ {1, 2, . . . , m2 }
∆
2
(24)
with ωi 6= ωj , ωi + ωj 6= ωk , i, j, k ∈ {1, 2, . . . , m2 }, and ωi > ω ∗ , ∀ i ∈ {1, 2, . . . , m2 }, with ω ∗ large enough.
Then, the norm of the error vector z(t) admits the following bound
kz(t)k ≤ β(kz(0)k, t) + γ(β̃(ke∆ (0)k, t) + ke∆ kmax ),
where ke∆ kmax =
ξ1
ω0
+
qP
m2 2
i=1 ai ,
ξ1 > 0, ω0 = maxi∈{1,2,...,m2 } ωi , β ∈ KL, β̃ ∈ KL and γ ∈ K.
Proof: Based on Theorem 2, we know that the tracking error dynamics (22) is ISS from the input e∆ (t) to
the state z(t). Thus, by Definition 1, there exist a class KL function β and a class K function γ such that for
any initial state z(0), any bounded input e∆ (t) and any t ≥ 0,
kz(t)k ≤ β(kz(0)k, t) + γ( sup ke∆ (τ )k).
(25)
0≤τ ≤t
b , to do so we use the results presented
Now, we need to evaluate the bound on the estimation vector ∆(t)
in [17]. First, based on Assumption A8, the cost function is locally Lipschitz, i.e. there exists η1 > 0 such
b ∗ ). Furthermore, since J is analytic, it can be
that |J(∆1 ) − J(∆2 )| ≤ η1 k∆1 − ∆2 k, for all ∆1 , ∆2 ∈ V(∆
b ∗ ) by a quadratic function, e.g. Taylor series up to the second order. Based on this
approximated locally in V(∆
and on Assumptions A6 and A7, we can obtain the following bound ([17, p. 436-437],[28])
ke∆ (t)k − kd(t)k ≤ ke∆ (t) − d(t)k ≤ β̃(ke∆ (0), tk) +
ξ1
,
ω0
where β̃ ∈ KL, ξ1 > 0, t ≥ 0, ω0 = maxi∈{1,2,...,m2 } ωi , and d(t) = [a1 sin(ω1 t + π2 ), . . . , am2 sin(ωm2 t + π2 )]T .
We can further obtain that
ξ1
+ kd(t)k
ω0
v
u m2
X
ξ1 u
a2i .
≤ β̃(ke∆ (0), tk) +
+t
ω0
ke∆ (t)k ≤ β̃(ke∆ (0), tk) +
i=1
Together with (25) yields the desired result.
Remark 3: The adaptive controller of Lemma 3 uses the ES algorithm (24) to estimate the model parametric
uncertainties. One might ask the question: where is the famous persistence of excitation (PE) condition here ? The
answer can be found in the examination of equation (24). Indeed, the ES algorithm uses as ‘input’ the sinusoidal
signals ai sin(ωi t + π2 ) which clearly satisfy the PE condition. The main difference with classical adaptive control
result, is that these excitation signals are not entering the system dynamics directly, but instead are applied as
inputs to the ES algorithm, reflected on the ES estimations outputs and thus transmitted to the system through
the feedback loop.
As we mentioned earlier, the dither-based MES has a problem of local minima, to improve this point we propose
in the next section to use GP-UCB as the model-free learning algorithm for model uncertainties estimation.
D. GP-UCB based parametric uncertainties estimation
In this section we propose to use Gaussian Process Upper Confidence Bound (GP-UCB) algorithm to find the
uncertain parameter ∆ vector [20], [29]. GP-UCB is a Bayesian optimization algorithm for stochastic optimization,
i.e., the task of finding the global optimum of an unknown function when the evaluations are potentially
contaminated with noise. The underlying working assumption for Bayesian optimization algorithms, including
GP-UCB, is that the function evaluation is costly, so we would like to minimize the number of evaluations
while having as accurate estimate of the minimizer (or maximizer) as possible [30]. For GP-UCB, this goal is
guaranteed by having an upper bound on the regret of the algorithm – to be defined precisely later.
One difficulty of stochastic optimization is that since we only observe noisy samples from the function, we
cannot really be sure about the exact value of a function at any given point. One may try to query a single
point many times in order to have an accurate estimate of the function. This, however, may lead to excessive
number of samples, and can be wasteful way of assigning samples when the true value of the function at
that point is actually far from optimal. The Upper Confidence Bounds (UCB) family of algorithms provide
a principled approach to guide the search [31]. These algorithms, which are not necessarily formulated in a
Bayesian framework, automatically balance the exploration (i.e., finding regions of the parameter space that
might be promising) and the exploration (i.e., focusing on the regions that are known to be the best based on
the current available knowledge) using the principle of optimism in the face of uncertainty. These algorithms
often come with strong theoretical guarantee about their performance. For more information about the UCB class
of algorithms, refer to [32], [33], [34]. GP-UCB is a particular UCB algorithms that is suitable to deal with
continuous domains. It uses a Gaussian Process (GP) to maintain the mean and confidence information about the
unknown function.
We briefly discuss GP-UCB in our context following the discussion of the original papers [20], [29]. Consider
the cost function J : D → R to be minimized. This function depends on the dynamics of the closed-loop system,
b used in the controller design. So we may consider it as an unknown
which itself depends on the parameters ∆
b.
function of ∆
For the moment, let us assume that J is a function sampled from a Gaussian Process (GP) [35]. Recall
that a GP is a stochastic process indexed by the set D that has the property that for any finite subset of
t
b 1, ∆
b 2, . . . , ∆
b t } ⊂ D , the joint distribution of J(∆
b i)
is a multivariate
the evaluation points, that is {∆
i=1
h
i
b = E J(∆)
b and its covariance function (or kernel)
Gaussian distribution. GP is defined by a mean function µ(∆)
h
i
b ∆
b ′ ) = Cov(J(∆),
b J(∆
b ′ )) = E J(∆)
b − µ(∆)
b
b ′ ) − µ(∆
b ′ ) . The kernel K of a GP determines the
K (∆,
J(∆
b b′ 2
∆k
b ∆
b ′ ) = exp − k∆−
behavior of a typical function sampled from the GP. For instance, if we choose K(∆,
,
2l2
the squared exponential kernel with length scale l > 0, it implies that the the GP is mean square differentiable
of all orders. We write J ∼ GP(µ, K ).
Let us first briefly describe how we can find the posterior distribution of a GP(0, K ); a GP with zero prior mean.
b 1, ∆
b 2, . . . , ∆
b t−1 } ⊂ D , we have observed the noisy evaluation yi = J(∆
b i ) + ηi
b t−1 , {∆
Suppose that for ∆
with ηi ∼ N (0, σ 2 ) being i.i.d. Gaussian noise. We can find the posterior mean and variance for a new point
b ∗ ∈ D as follows: Denote the vector of observed values by yt−1 = [y1 , . . . , yt−1 ]⊤ ∈ Rt−1 , and define the
∆
b i, ∆
b j ), and the vector
Grammian matrix K ∈ Rt−1×t−1 with [K]i,j = K (∆
K∗
b 1, ∆
b ∗ ), . . . , K (∆
b t−1 , ∆
b ∗ )].
= [K(∆
b ∗ ) and the variance σt (∆
b ∗ ) of the posterior of the GP evaluated at ∆
b ∗ are (cf. Section
The expected mean µt (∆
2.2 of [35])
b ∗ ) = K∗ K + σ 2 I −1 yt−1 ,
µt (∆
2 −1
b ∗ ) = K(∆
b ∗, ∆
b ∗ ) − K⊤
σt2 (∆
K∗ .
∗ K +σ I
b t by solving the following optimization
At round t, the GP-UCB algorithm selects the next query point ∆
problem1 :
b
b − β 1/2 σt−1 (∆).
b t ← argmin µt−1 (∆)
∆
t
(26)
b
∆∈D
Where βt depends on the choice of kernel among other parameters of the problem.
The optimization problem (26) is often nonlinear and non-convex. Nonetheless solving it only requires querying
the GP, which in general is much faster than querying the original dynamical system. This is important when the
dynamical system is a physical system and we would like to minimize the number of interactions with it before
b with small J(∆)
b . One practically easy way to approximately solve (26) is to restrict the search to a
finding a ∆
finite subset D ′ of D . The finite subset can be a uniform grid structure over D , or it might consist of randomly
selected members of D .
The theoretical guarantee for GP-UCB is in the form of regret upper bound. Let us define ∆∗ ← argmin∆∈D J(∆),
b t ) − J(∆∗ ). This is
the global minimizer of the objective function. The regret at time t is defined by rt = J(∆
b t according the cost function J . The cumulative regret at time T
a measure of sub-optimality of the choice of ∆
PT
is defined as RT = t=1 rt . Ideally we would like limt→∞ RTT = 0.
The behavior of the cumulative regret RT depends on the set D and the choice of kernel. If we fix the
confidence parameter δ > 0, for the squared exponential kernel, the asymptotic behavior of RT is
q
d+1
O
T [log (T ) + log(1/δ)] ,
with probability at least 1 − δ (cf. Theorem 3 of [20], [29]). This result does not even require the function J to
be a GP. It only requires the function to have a finite norm in the reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) HK
defined by the kernel K.
1
UCB algorithms are often formulated as maximization problems, so the “upper” confidence bound is calculated. Here we actually
compute the “lower” confidence bound, but to keep the naming convection, we still GP-UCB instead of GP-LCB.
Remark 4: One main difference with some of the existing model-based adaptive controllers, is the fact that
the learning-based estimation algorithm used here does not depend on the model of the system, i.e., the only
information needed to compute the learning cost function (23) is the desired trajectory and the measured output
of the system (please refer to Section V for an example). This makes the learning-based adaptive controllers
suitable for the general case of nonlinear parametric uncertainties. For example in [36], a similar preliminary
algorithm has been tested in the case of nonlinear models of electromagnetic actuators with a nonlinear parametric
uncertainty. Another point worth mentioning here, is the fact that with the available modular model-based adaptive
controllers, like the X-swapping modular algorithms, e.g., [37], it is not possible in some cases to estimate
multiple uncertainties simultaneously. For instance, it is shown in [15] that the X-swapping adaptive control
cannot estimate multiple uncertainties in the case of electromagnetic actuators, due to the linear dependency
of the uncertain parameters, i.e., when we consider three parametric uncertainties affecting the same output
acceleration, in which case the model-based estimation filters cannot distinguish between the uncertainties from
this acceleration. However, when dealing with the same example, the MES-based modular indirect adaptive control
approach was successful in estimating multiple uncertainties at the same time [28]. A similarly challenging case
is considered in the example presented in the next section.
V. T WO - LINK M ANIPULATOR E XAMPLE
We consider here a two-link robot manipulator, with the following dynamics (see e.g. [38])
H(q)q̈ + C(q, q̇)q̇ + G(q) = τ,
(27)
where q , [q1 , q2 ]T denotes the two joint angles and τ , [τ1 , τ2 ]T denotes the two joint torques. The matrix
H ∈ R4×4 is assumed to be non-singular and its elements are given by
H11 = m1 ℓ2c1 + I1 + m2 [ℓ21 + ℓ2c2 + 2ℓ1 ℓc2 cos(q2 )] + I2 ,
H12 = m2 ℓ1 ℓc2 cos(q2 ) + m2 ℓ2c2 + I2 ,
(28)
H21 = H12 ,
H22 = m2 ℓ2c2 + I2 .
The matrix C(q, q̇) is given by
C(q, q̇) ,
−hq˙2
−hq˙1 − hq˙2
hq˙1
0
where h = m2 ℓ1 ℓc2 sin(q2 ). The vector G = [G1 , G2 ]T is given by
,
G1 = m1 ℓc1 g cos(q1 ) + m2 g[ℓ2 cos(q1 + q2 ) + ℓ1 cos(q1 )],
(29)
G2 = m2 ℓc2 g cos(q1 + q2 ),
where, ℓ1 , ℓ2 are the lengths of the first and second link, respectively, ℓc1 , ℓc2 are the distances between the
rotation center and the center of mass of the first and second link respectively. m1 , m2 are the masses of the
first and second link, respectively, I1 is the moment of inertia of the first link and I2 the moment of inertia of
the second link, respectively, and g denotes the earth gravitational constant.
In our simulations, we assume that the parameters take the following values: I2 =
m2 = 5.5 kg, ℓ1 = 1.1 m, ℓ2 = 1.1 m, ℓc1 = 0.5 m, ℓc2 = 0.5 m, I1 =
11
12
5.5
12
kg · m2 , m1 = 10.5 kg,
kg · m2 , g = 9.8 m/s2 . The system
dynamics (27) can be rewritten as
q̈ = H −1 (q)τ − H −1 (q) [C(q, q̇)q̇ + G(q)] .
(30)
Thus, the nominal controller is given by
τn = [C(q, q̇)q̇ + G(q)]
+ H(q) [q¨d − Kd (q̇ − q˙d ) − Kp (q − qd )] ,
(31)
where qd = [q1d , q2d ]T , denotes the desired trajectory and the diagonal gain matrices Kp > 0, Kd > 0, are chosen
such that the linear error dynamics (as in (11)) are asymptotically stable. We choose as output references the
P
5th order polynomials q1ref (t) = q2ref (t) = 5i=0 ai (t/tf )i , where the ai ’s have been computed to satisfy the
boundary constraints qiref (0) = 0, qiref (tf ) = qf , q̇iref (0) = q̇iref (tf ) = 0, q̈iref (0) = q̈iref (tf ) = 0, i = 1, 2,
with tf = 2 sec, qf = 1.5 rad. In these tests, we assume that the nonlinear model (27) is uncertain. In particular,
we assume that there exist additive uncertainties in the model (30), i.e.,
q̈ = H −1 (q)τ − H −1 (q) [C(q, q̇)q̇ + G(q)] − E G(q).
(32)
Where, E is a matrix of constant uncertain parameters. Following (21), the robust-part of the control writes as
τr = −H(B̃ T P zkGk2 − Ê G(q)),
where
B̃ T =
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 1
(33)
,
P is solution of the Lyapunov equation (13), with
0
1
0
0
−Kp1 −Kd1
0
0
à =
0
0
0
1
0
0
−Kp2 −Kd2
,
z = [q1 − q1d , q̇1 − q̇1d , q2 − q2d , q̇2 − q̇2d ]T , and Ê is the matrix of the parameters’ estimates. Eventually, the
final feedback controller writes as
τ = τn + τr .
(34)
We consider here the challenging case where the uncertain parameters are linearly dependent. In this case the
uncertainties’ ‘effect’ is not observable from the measured output (see Remark 4). Indeed, in the case where the
uncertainties enter the model in a linearly dependent function, e.g. when the matric ∆ has only one non-zero line,
some of the classical available modular model-based adaptive controllers, like for instance X-swapping controllers,
cannot be used to estimate all the uncertain parameters simultaneously. For example, it has been shown in [15],
that the model-based gradient descent filters failed to estimate simultaneously multiple parameters in the case of
the electromagnetic actuators example. For instance, in comparison with the ES-based indirect adaptive controller
of [21], the modular approach does not rely on the parameters mutual exhaustive assumption, i.e., each element
of the control vector needs to be linearly dependent on at least one element of the uncertainties vector. More
specifically, we consider here the following case: ∆(1, 1) = 0.3, ∆(1, 2) = 0.6, and ∆(2, i) = 0, i = 1, 2.
In this case, the uncertainties’ effect on the acceleration q̈1 cannot be differentiated, and thus the application
of the model-based X-swapping method to estimate the actual values of both uncertainties at the same time is
challenging. Similarly, the method of [21], cannot be readily applied because the second control τ2 is not linearly
depend on the uncertainties, which only affects τ1 . However, we show next that, by using the modular ISS-based
controller, we manage to estimate the actual values of the uncertainties simultaneously and improve the tracking
performance.
A. MES-based uncertainties estimation
b i (i = 1, 2) are computed using a discrete version of (24), given by
The estimates of the two parameters ∆
π
b
xi (k + 1) = xi (k) + ai tf sin(ωi tf k + )J(∆),
2
(35)
b i (k + 1) = xi (k + 1) + ai sin(ωi tf k − π ), i = 1, 2
∆
2
b i (0) = 0. We choose the following learning cost function
where, k ∈ N denotes the iteration index, xi (0) = ∆
R
b − qd (t))T Q1 (q(∆)
b − qd (t))dt
b = tf (q(∆)
J(∆)
0
(36)
Rt
b − q̇d (t))T Q2 (q̇(∆)
b − q̇d (t))dt,
+ 0 f (q̇(∆)
where Q1 > 0 and Q2 > 0 denote the weight matrices. We implement the learning parameters: a1 = 0.1,
a2 = 0.05, ω1 = 7 rad/sec, ω2 = 5 rad/sec. The obtained performance cost function is displayed on Figure
1(a), where we see that the performance improves over the learning iterations. The corresponding parameters
estimation profiles are reported on Figures 1(b), and 1(c), which show a quick convergence of the first estimates
ˆ 1 to a neighborhood of the actual value. The convergence of the second estimates ∆
ˆ 2 is slower, which is
∆
expected from the ES algorithms when many parameters are estimated at the same time. One has to underline
here, however, that the convergence speed of the estimates and the excursion around their final mean values,
can be directly fine-tuned by the proper choice of the learning coefficients ai , ωi , i = 1, 2 in equation (35).
Finally, The tracking performance is shown on Figures 2(a), 2(b), where we can see that, after learning the actual
values of the uncertainties, the tracking of the desired trajectories is recovered. We only show the first angular
trajectories here, because the uncertainties affect directly only the acceleration q̈1 , and their effect on the tracking
for the second angular variable is negligible.
Cost Function
5
4
3
2
1
0
0
50
100
150
200
250
Number of iterations
(a) Cost function over the learning iterations (MES)
1
ˆ1
∆
0.5
0
−0.5
0
50
100
150
200
250
Number of iterations
(b) Estimate of ∆1 over the learning iterations (MES)
0.4
ˆ2
∆
0.2
0
−0.2
−0.4
0
50
100
150
200
250
Number of iterations
(c) Estimate of ∆2 over the learning iterations (MES)
Fig. 1.
Cost function and uncertainties estimates- MES algorithm
B. GP UCB-based uncertainties estimation
In this section, to show that the modular ISS-based controller is independent of the choice of the learning
algorithm, we apply the GP-UCB learning algorithm-based estimator to the same two-links manipulator example.
2
)t
We apply the algorithm IV-D, with the following parameters: σ = 0.1, l = 0.2, and βt = 2log( card(D
6δ
′
π2
), with
δ = 0.05.
We test the GP-UCB algorithm under the same conditions as in the previous section. The obtained parameters
and tracking results are reported on figures 3(a), 3(b), 3(c), 4(a), 4(b). We can see on these figures that similar
Desired and Actual q1 [rad]
2
Reference
With learning
Without learning
1.5
1
0.5
0
−0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
Time [sec]
Desired and Actual q̇1 [rad/sec]
(a) Obtained vs. desired first angular trajectory (MES)
1.5
1
0.5
0
−0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
Time [sec]
(b) Obtained vs. desired first angular velocity trajectory (MES)
Fig. 2.
Obtained vs. desired trajectories (MES)
to the MES-based adaptive controller, the uncertainties are well estimated. One could argue that they are better
estimated with the GP-UCB algorithm because there is no permanent dither signal, which leads to permanent
oscillations in the MES-based learning. The tracking performance is clearly improved in this case as well, due
to the precise estimation of the parameters.
6
Cost Function
5
4
3
2
1
0
50
100
150
200
Number of iterations
(a) Cost function over the learning iterations (GP-UCB)
1
0.8
ˆ1
∆
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0
50
100
150
200
Number of iterations
(b) Estimate of ∆1 over the learning iterations (GP-UCB)
0.8
ˆ2
∆
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
50
100
150
200
Number of iterations
(c) Estimate of ∆2 over the learning iterations (GP-UCB)
Fig. 3.
Cost function and uncertainties estimates- (GP-UCB) algorithm
1.6
Reference
With learning
Without learning
Desired and Actual q1 [rad]
1.4
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
−0.2
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
Time [sec]
(a) Obtained vs. desired first angular trajectory (GP-UCB)
1.6
Desired and Actual q̇1 [rad/sec]
1.4
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
Reference
With learning
Without learning
0
−0.2
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
Time [sec]
(b) Obtained vs. desired first angular velocity trajectory (GPU-CB)
Fig. 4.
Obtained vs. desired trajectories (GPU-CB)
VI. C ONCLUSION
We have studied the problem of adaptive control for nonlinear systems which are affine in the control with
parametric uncertainties. For this class of systems, we have proposed the following controller: We use a modular
approach, where we first design a robust nonlinear controller, designed based on the model (assuming knowledge
of the uncertain parameters), and then complement this controller with an estimation module to estimate the actual
values of the uncertain parameters. This type of modular approaches are certainly not new, e.g., the X-swapping
methods. However, the novelty here is that the estimation module that we propose is based on model-free learning
algorithms. Indeed, we propose to use two learning algorithms, namely, a multi-parametric extremum seeking
algorithm, and a GP-UCB algorithm, to learn in realtime the uncertainties of the model. We call the learning
approach ‘model-free’ for the simple reason that it only requires to measure an output signal from the system
and compare it to a desired reference signal (independent of the model), to learn the best estimates of the
model uncertainties. We have guaranteed the stability (while learning) of the proposed approach, by ensuring
that the model-based robust controller, leads to an ISS results, which guarantees boundedness of the states of the
closed-loop system, even during the learning phase. The ISS result together with a convergent learning-algorithm
eventually leads to a bounded output tracking error, which decreases with the decrease of the estimation error. We
believe that, one of the main advantages of the proposed controller, comparatively to the existing model-based
adaptive controllers, is that we can learn (estimate) multiple uncertainties at the same time even if they appear
in the model equation in a challenging way, e.g., linearly dependent uncertainties affecting only one output, or
uncertainties appearing in a nonlinear term of the model, which are well known limitations of the model-based
estimation approaches. Another advantage of the proposed approach, is that due to its modular design, one could
easily change the learning algorithm without having to change the model-based part of the controller. Indeed, as
long as the first part of the controller, i.e., the model-based part, has been designed with a proper ISS property,
one can ‘plug into it’ any convergent learning model-free algorithm, as demonstrated here by using two different
learning approaches. We reported in this short paper some preliminary results about using GP-UCB in a modular
adaptive control setting. In a longer journal version of the work, we will report more detailed comparisons
between the MES-based adaptive controller, the GP UCB-based controller (for example in a more realistic noisy
environment), and some existing model-based ‘classical’ adaptive controllers, e.g., as found in [1].
R EFERENCES
[1] P. Ioannou and J. Sun, Robust Adaptive Control.
Dover Publications, 2012.
[2] M. Krstic, I. Kanellakopoulos, and P. Kokotovic, Nonlinear and Adpative Control Design.
New York: Wiley, 1995.
[3] C. Wang, D. J. Hill, S. S. Ge, and G. Chen, “An ISS-modular approach for adaptive neural control of pure-feedback systems,”
Automatica, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 723–731, 2006.
[4] M. Benosman and G. Atinc, “Multi-parametric extremum seeking-based learning control for electromagnetic actuators,” in American
Control Conference, 2013, pp. 1914–1919.
[5] ——, “Nonlinear learning-based adaptive control for electromagnetic actuators,” in European Control Conference, 2013, pp. 2904–
2909.
[6] G. Atinc and M. Benosman, “Nonlinear learning-based adaptive control for electromagnetic actuators with proof of stability,” in
IEEE, Conference on Decision and Control, 2013, pp. 1277–1282.
[7] M. Benosman, “Learning-based adaptive control for nonlinear systems,” in IEEE European Control Conference, 2014.
[8] ——, “Extremum-seeking based adaptive control for nonlinear systems,” in IFAC World Congress, 2014.
[9] K. A. Wise and E. Lavretsky, “Robust and adaptive control of x-45a j-ucas: A design trade study,” in IFAC World Congress.
[10] M. Xia and M. Benosman, “Extremum seeking-based indirect adaptive control for nonlinear systems with time-varying uncertainties,”
in European Control Conference, 2015.
[11] E. Lavretsky, “Combined/composit model reference adaptive control,” IEEE, Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 54, no. 11, pp.
2692–2697, 2009.
[12] P. Haghi and K. Ariyur, “On the extremum seeking of model reference adaptive control in higher-dimensional systems,” in American
Control Conference, 2011, pp. 1176–1181.
[13] E. D. Sontag, “Smooth stabilization implies coprime factorization,” Automatic Control, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 34, no. 4, pp.
435–443, 1989.
[14] Z.-P. Jiang, A. R. Teel, and L. Praly, “Small-gain theorem for ISS systems and applications,” Mathematics of Control, Signals and
Systems, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 95–120, 1994.
[15] M. Benosman and G. Atinc, “Non-linear adaptive control for electromagnetic actuators,” IET Control Theory and Applications,
vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 258–269, 2015.
[16] K. B. Ariyur and M. Krstic, Real Time Optimization by Extremum Seeking Control.
New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons,
Inc., 2003.
[17] M. Rotea, “Analysis of multivariable extremum seeking algorithms,” in American Control Conference, 2000. Proceedings of the
2000, vol. 1, no. 6, Sep 2000, pp. 433–437.
[18] M. Krstic and H.-H. Wang, “Stability of extremum seeking feedback for general nonlinear dynamic systems,” Automatica, vol. 36.
[19] A. R. Teel and D. Popovic, “Solving smooth and nonsmooth multivariable extremum seeking problems by the methods of nonlinear
programming,” in American Control Conference, 2001. Proceedings of the 2001, vol. 3.
IEEE, 2001, pp. 2394–2399.
[20] N. Srinivas, A. Krause, S. M. Kakade, and M. Seeger, “Gaussian process optimization in the bandit setting: No regret and experimental
design,” in Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2010.
[21] P. Haghi and K. Ariyur, “Adpative feedback linearization of nonlinear MIMO systems using ES-MRAC,” in American Control
Conference, 2013, pp. 1828–1833.
[22] M. Benosman and G. Atinc, “Model-based learning control,” Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories (MERL), Patent 20130304236,
May 2012.
[23] M. Benosman, Control Theory: Perspectives, Applications and Developments, 2015, ch. Extremum Seeking-based Indirect Adaptive
Control and Feedback Gains Auto-Tuning for Nonlinear Systems.
[24] H. Khalil, Nonlinear Systems, 3rd ed.
Prentice Hall, 2002.
[25] M. Malisoff and F. Mazenc, “Further remarks on strict input-to-state stable lyapunov functions for time-varying systems,” Automatica,
vol. 41, no. 11, pp. 1973 – 1978, 2005.
[26] M. Benosman, F. Liao, K.-Y. Lum, and J. L. Wang, “Nonlinear control allocation for non-minimum phase systems,” Control Systems
Technology, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 394–404, March 2009.
[27] H. Elmali and N. Olgac, “Robust output tracking control of nonlinear mimo systems via sliding mode technique,” Automatica,
vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 145–151, 1992.
[28] M. Benosman and G. Atinc, “Nonlinear backstepping learning-based adaptive control of electromagnetic actuators,” International
Journal of Control, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 517–530, 2014.
[29] N. Srinivas, A. Krause, S. M. Kakade, and M. Seeger, “Information-theoretic regret bounds for gaussian process optimization in the
bandit setting,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 3250–3265, 2012.
[30] E. Brochu, V. M. Cora, and N. de Freitas, “A tutorial on bayesian optimization of expensive cost functions, with application to active
user modeling and hierarchical reinforcement learning,” arXiv:1012.2599, 2010.
[31] P. Auer, N. Cesa-Bianchi, and P. Fischer, “Finite-time analysis of the multiarmed bandit problem,” Machine learning, vol. 47, no.
2-3, pp. 235–256, 2002.
[32] S. Bubeck, R. Munos, G. Stoltz, and Cs. Szepesvári, “X-armed bandits,” Journal of Machine Learning Research (JMLR), vol. 12,
no. 1655–1695, 2011.
[33] S. Bubeck and N. Cesa-Bianchi, “Regret analysis of stochastic and nonstochastic multi-armed bandit problems,” Foundations and
Trends in Machine Learning, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–122, 2012.
[34] R. Munos, “From bandits to Monte-Carlo Tree Search: The optimistic principle applied to optimization and planning,” Foundations
and Trends in Machine Learning, vol. 7(1), pp. 1–130, 2014.
[35] C. E. Rasmussen and C. K. I. Williams, Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning.
MIT Press, 2006.
[36] M. Benosman, “Nonlinear learning-based adaptive control for electromagnetic actuators,” in IEEE European Control Conference,
2013, pp. 2904–2909.
[37] M. Krstic, I. Kanellakopoulos, and P. V. Kokotovic, Nonlinear and adaptive control design.
Wiley, 1995.
[38] M. W. Spong, “On the robust control of robot manipulators,” Automatic Control, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 37, no. 11, pp. 1782–
2786, 1992.
| 3cs.SY
|
Noname manuscript No.
(will be inserted by the editor)
Adaptive group LASSO selection in quantile models
arXiv:1601.08065v2 [math.ST] 13 Jul 2016
GABRIELA CIUPERCA
Received: date / Accepted: date
Abstract The paper considers a linear model with grouped explanatory variables. If the model
errors are not with zero mean and bounded variance or if model contains outliers, then the least
squares framework is not appropriate. Thus, the quantile regression is an interesting alternative.
In order to automatically select the relevant variable groups, we propose and study here the adaptive group LASSO quantile estimator. We establish the sparsity and asymptotic normality of the
proposed estimator in two cases: fixed number and divergent number of variable groups. Numerical
study by Monte Carlo simulations confirms the theoretical results and illustrates the performance
of the proposed estimator.
Keywords group selection · quantile model · adaptive LASSO · selection consistency · oracle
properties.
Mathematics Subject Classification (2010) 62J05 · 62J07
1 Introduction
Classically, for the regression model, the errors are assumed to be independent, of mean zero and
bounded variance. Then, the model is estimated by the least squares (LS) method, eventually with
a penalty of LASSO type when automatic detection of significant variables is performed. If the
assumptions on the first two moments of the model error are not satisfied, then the LS framework
breaks down. In this case, an alternative is to consider the quantile regression with a LASSO type
penalty. This is one of the interests of this paper. The quantile regression is robust and allows
relaxation of the two first moment conditions of the model error.
Often enough in practice, for example in the variance analysis case, are considered the regression
linear models with grouped variables. For models with grouped explanatory variables it is more
meaningful to identify relevant variable groups instead of individual variables. If the errors have
GABRIELA CIUPERCA
Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, CNRS, UMR 5208, Institut Camille Jordan, Bat. Braconnier, 43, blvd du 11
novembre 1918, F - 69622 Villeurbanne Cedex, France,
E-mail: [email protected]
tel: 33(0)4.26.23.45.57, fax: 33(0)4.72.43.16.87
2
GABRIELA CIUPERCA
Normal distribution, then for detecting the relevant variable groups, the F-statistic test is used. If
the errors are not Gaussian and if more the number of groups is large, then the F-statistic test is
inappropriate. From where, another interest of this paper: we consider the quantile process with
LASSO type penalty in order to automatically detect the irrelevant variable groups.
The automatic selection method of the grouped variables using the LASSO penalties was introduced by Yuan and Lin (2008) for gaussian errors, by proposing the LASSO group penalty for
the process of the error squares sum. Several recent papers have considered group selection using
LASSO type penalties. For fixed parameter space and mean zero, finite second moment i.i.d. model
errors, Nardi and Rinaldo (2008) established the model selection consistency and asymptotic normality of nonzero group LASSO estimator. The same estimator is studied by Nardi and Rinaldo
(2008) when number of covariates is larger, for particular case of normal errors. For gaussian errors,
Xu and Ghosh (2015) realize a Bayesian variable selection by penalization of the error squares sum
with Bayesian group LASSO. For this estimation method, the posterior median estimator satisfies
the sparsity property. The adaptive group LASSO estimators, when the number p of groups is fixed,
was studied by Wang and Leng (2008). For high-dimensional model, Wei and Huang (2010) studied
the selection and estimation properties of the adaptive group LASSO, but under assumption that
the errors are gaussian. Still for the error squares sum penalized with adaptive LASSO penalty,
Zhang and Xiang (2015) consider the case of the number of groups pn converges to infinity when
n → ∞, for i.i.d. errors ε such that IE[ε] = 0 and V ar[ε] < ∞. The consistency and asymptotic normality of the parameter estimator are established. A paper that doesn’t consider the LS penalized
process, but a process associated to a twice differentiable convex function, with LASSO penalty,
for the case p large and small n was considered by Wang et al. (2015). When the number of groups
can grow at a certain polynomial rate, the automatic selection property of variable groups for a
LS process with SCAD penalty has been proven in Guo et al. (2015). Automatic selection of the
relevant variable groups, when p converges to infinity, has also considered by Zou and Zhang (2009)
penalizing the LS process with adaptive elastic-net penalty. For a review of group selection methods
and several applications of these methods the reader can see Huang et al. (2012).
In this paper we consider the model selection problem and the estimation in a linear model with
p groups of explanatory variables. We propose and study the asymptotic properties of the adaptive
group LASSO quantile estimator in two cases: p fixed and p → ∞ as n → ∞. This estimator is the
minimizer of the quantile process penalized by an adaptive group LASSO penalty. The oracle properties, i.e. the automatic selection of significant variables groups and their asymptotic distribution,
are proved.
The remainder of the paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 we present the model and
introduce some notations used throughout in this paper. Oracle properties for the adaptive group
LASSO quantile estimator are proved for p fixed in Section 3 and for p → ∞ as n → ∞ in Section 4. Section 5 reports some simulation results which illustrate the method interest. We compare
the adaptive group LASSO quantile estimation performance with the adaptive group LASSO least
squares estimations, proposed by Zhang and Xiang (2015). All proofs are given in Section 6.
2 Model and notations
In this section, we present the statistical model and we also introduce some notations used throughout in the paper.
We begin by introducing some general notations. All vectors and matrices are denoted by bold symbols and all vectors are written as column vectors. For a vector v, we denote by vt its transposed
Adaptive group LASSO selection in quantile models
L
3
P
and by kvk its Euclidean norm. Notations −→ , −→ represent the convergence in distribution and
n→∞ n→∞
in probability, respectively, as n → ∞. For a positive definite matrix M, we denote by λmin (M)
and λmax (M) its the smallest and largest eigenvalues, respectively.
We will also use the following notations: if Vn and Un are random variable sequences, Vn = oIP (Un )
means that limn→∞ IP [|Un /Vn | > e] = 0 for any e > 0, Vn = OIP (Un ) means that there exists
a finite C > 0 such that IP [|Un /Vn | > C] < e for any n and e. If Vn and Un are deterministic
sequences, Vn = o(Un ) means that the sequence Vn /Un → 0 for n → ∞, Vn = O(Un ) means that
the sequence Vn /Un is bounded for sufficiently large n.
Throughout this paper, C will denote generic constant; not depending on size n which may take
different values in different formula or even in different parts of the same formula. The value of C
is not of interest. We will also use the notation 0k for the zero k-vector.
We consider the following linear model with p groups of explanatory variables:
Yi =
p
X
Xtij β j + εi = Xti β + εi ,
j=1
i = 1, · · · , n,
(1)
with Yi , εi random variables. For each group j = 1, · · · , p, the vector of the parameters is βj ≡
(βj1 , · · · , βjdj ) ∈ Rdj and the design for observation i is Xij , a column vector of size dj . The vector
with all coefficients is β ≡ (β 1 , · · · , βp ) and for observation i, the vector with all explanatory
0
0
variables is Xi = (Xi1 , · · · , Xip ). Denote by β0j = (βj1
, · · · , βjd
) the true value (unknown) of the
j
parameter β j . For observation i, we denote by Xij,k the kth variable of the jth group.
We emphasize that for the ith sample, we observe (Yi , Xi ), i = 1, · · · , n.
The relevant groups of explanatory variables correspond to the nonzero vectors. Without loss of
generality, on suppose that the first p0 (p0 ≤ p) groups of explanatory variables are relevant:
kβ0j k 6= 0,
for all j ≤ p0
and kβ0j k = 0,
for all j > p0 ,
P
where k.k is the Euclidean norm. Let r be the total number of explanatory variables, so r = pj=1 dj .
P
0
We denote by r0 = pj=1
dj . So, p0 is the number of nonzero true parameter vectors and r0 is the
total number of parameters in these nonzero true vectors.
The multi-factor ANOVA model is an example of this model.
We introduce now the quantile framework. For a fixed quantile index τ ∈ (0, 1), the check
function ρτ (.) : R → R+ is defined by ρτ (u) = u(τ − 11u<0 ).
The quantile estimator of β, is the minimizer of the quantile process associated to model (1):
e ≡ arg min
β
n
β∈Rr
n
X
i=1
ρτ (Yi − Xti β).
(2)
For the particular case τ = 1/2 we obtain the median regression and (2) becomes the least absolute
deviations estimator. A great advantage of the quantile framework is that, compared to classical
estimation methods that are sensitive to outliers, the quantile method provides more robust estimators. Moreover, the required assumptions to the error moments are relaxed.
e = (β
e ,β
e ,··· ,β
e ) has as dj -subvector β
e
The estimator β
n
n;1
n;2
n;p
n;j for each group j = 1, · · · , p.
The quantile estimation method doesn’t perform automatic variable selection. For finding the zero
4
GABRIELA CIUPERCA
vectors, i.e. the irrelevant groups of variables, hypothesis tests are required. However when model
(1) has a large group number p, it is useful to estimate simultaneously the parameter groups and
to eliminate the irrelevant groups without crossing every time by a hypothesis test. The adaptive
LASSO penalties have the advantage of automatic selection and of parameter estimation (see for
example Zhang and Xiang (2015), Wei and Huang (2010), Wang and Leng (2008)).
In order to introduce and study the adaptive LASSO estimator, we consider the following index
set
A ≡ {j; kβ0j k 6= 0} = {1, · · · , p0 }
and Ac ≡ {j; kβ0j k = 0} = {p0 + 1, · · · , p} its complementary set. The set A contains the index set
corresponding to groups with nonzero true parameters.
For β a r-vector of parameters, we denote by βA the r0 -subvector of β which contains βj , for
j = 1, · · · , p0 . Similarly, the (r − r0 )-vector β Ac contains βj for j = p0 + 1, · · · , p.
In practice, the set A is unknown. Then, we must find the set A and estimate the corresponding
parameters.
b ∗ , which minimizes the quantile
In Sections 3 and 4 we will introduce an estimator, denoted β
n
process penalized with an adaptive group LASSO penalty, for two cases: p fixed and p → ∞ as
n → ∞. We generalize the adaptive LASSO quantile estimator proposed by Ciuperca (2016) for
individual variable selection to the case of group selection. We call this estimator, adaptive group
LASSO quantile (ag LASSO Q ) estimator.
b ∗ satisfies the oracle properties if:
We say that β
n
√ b∗
0
(i) asymptotic normality: n(β
n − β )A converges in law to a centred Normal distribution.
b ∗ k 6= 0d }] = 1.
(ii) sparsity property: limn→∞ P[A = {j = 1, · · · , p; kβ
j
n;j
3 Fixed p case
In this section we propose and study the asymptotic properties of the ag LASSO Q estimator for
the parameter β of model (1) when the group number p is fixed.
We define the ag LASSO Q estimator by:
b ∗ ≡ arg min Q(β),
β
n
β∈Rr
where Q(β) is the penalized quantile process with the adaptive group LASSO penalty:
Q(β) ≡
n
X
i=1
ρτ (Yi −
p
X
j=1
Xtij β j ) + µn
p
X
j=1
ω
bn;j kβj k,
(3)
e k−γ , γ > 0. The estimator β
b ∗ is written as β
b ∗ = (β
b∗ , · · · , β
b ∗ ) and
with the weight ω
bn;j ≡ kβ
n;j
n
n
n;1
n;p
b ∗ is a subvector of size dj , for j = 1, · · · , p.
β
n;j
For a particular case of a quantile model with non-grouped variables, dj = 1 for all j = 1, · · · , p,
we obtain the adaptive LASSO quantile estimator proposed and studied by Ciuperca (2016).
Adaptive group LASSO selection in quantile models
5
b ∗ in the fixed p case, we give the required assumptions.
Before presenting the main results for β
n
The tuning parameter µn and the constant γ are such that, for n → ∞,
µn
µn → ∞, √ → 0, n(γ−1)/2 µn → ∞.
(4)
n
For the design (Xi )16i6n we consider theP
following assumption:
n
(A1) n−1 max1≤i≤n Xti Xi −→ 0 and n−1 i=1 Xi Xti −→ Υ, with Υ a r × r positive definite matrix.
n→∞
n→∞
For the errors εi we suppose that:
(A2) (εi )16i6n are independent, identically distributed, with F : B → [0, 1] the distribution function and a continuous positive density f in a neighborhood of 0. The τ th quantile of εi is zero:
τ = F (0). Moreover, for every e ∈ int(B), 1r ∈ Rr we have
n Z xti 1r
X
√
√
1
n[F (e + v/ n) − F (e)]dv = f (e)1tr Υ1r ,
(5)
lim n−1
n→∞
2
i=1 0
where 1r is the r-vector with all components 1. The set B is a real set, with 0 ∈ B.
Assumption (A1) is standard for LASSO methods and (A2) is classic for quantile regression
(see Ciuperca (2016), Koenker (2005), Zou and Yuan (2008), Wu and Liu (2009)). Assumption
(A1) requests that the design matrix has a reasonable good behaviour. For the tuning parameter
µn , the same conditions on (4) are required in Ciuperca (2016) for adaptive LASSO quantile model
but with ungrouped explanatory variables.
We make the remark that for ANOVA model, since in the analysis of variance there is a constraint for each level of a factor, we consider as constraint that the effect of this level is zero. Then
this zero level is not considered in the model in order that assumption (A1) is satisfied.
b ∗ , let us consider the index set
In order to study the asymptotic properties of the estimator β
n
of the groups selected by the adaptive group LASSO quantile method:
b∗c its complementary set.
and A
n
b ∗ k 6= 0}
Ab∗n ≡ {j ∈ {1, · · · , p}; kβ
n;j
The following Theorem shows that the ag LASSO Q estimators with the index in the set A
are asymptotically Gaussian. Then, the estimators of the nonzero parameter vectors have the same
asymptotic distribution they would have if the zero parameter vectors were known.
√ b∗
L
0
Theorem 1 Under assumptions (A1), (A2) and condition (4), we have n(β
n − β )A −→
n→∞
−1
N 0r0 , τ (1 − τ )f −2 (0)ΥA
, with P
ΥA the submatrix of Υ with the row and column indices in
p0
dj }.
{1, · · · , d1 , d1 + 1, · · · , d1 + d2 , · · · , j=1
We give now the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker(KKT) optimality conditions, needed to prove the sparsity
b∗ .
property for β
n
For all j ∈ Ab∗n , we have, with probability one, the following dj equalities
τ
n
X
i=1
Xij −
n
X
i=1
Xij 11Yi <Xt βb ∗
i
n
b∗
µn ω
bn;j β
n;j
=
.
∗
b k
kβ
n;j
(6)
6
GABRIELA CIUPERCA
For all j 6∈ Ab∗n , for all k = 1, · · · , dj we have, with probability one, the following inequality
τ
n
X
i=1
Xij,k −
n
X
i=1
Xij,k 11Yi <Xt βb ∗ ≤ µn ω
bn;j .
i
n
(7)
The following theorem shows the sparsity property of the ag LASSO Q estimator. This result
states that the adaptive group LASSO quantile estimators of the nonzero parameter vectors are
exactly nonzero with a probability converging to one when n diverges to infinity.
Theorem 2 Under the assumptions of Theorem 1 and under the condition nγ/2−1 λn → ∞, as
n → ∞, we have limn→∞ P[Ab∗n = A] = 1.
Theorem 1 and Theorem 2 establish the asymptotic normality and the sparsity of the ag LASSO Q
estimator, which means that this estimator still share the oracle properties in the case of fixed p.
Remark 1 For the weight ω
bn;j associated to the jth group, we considered the quantile estimator
norm to the power −γ. In view of the proofs of Theorem 1 and Theorem 2, these two theorems
−1/2
e
remain true also when β
, under
n;j is replaced by any estimator of β j , with convergence rate n
assumptions (A1), (A2).
4 The case of p depending on n
Consider now same model (1) with grouped variables, but with the number p of groups depending
on n: p = pn and pn → ∞ as n → ∞. More precisely, we consider pn = O(nc ), with the P
constant
c ∈ (0, 1). For readability, we keep the notation p instead of pn . Similarly, we have r = pj=1 dj ,
with r depending on n. Always for simplicity of notation, for the design Xi , for the parameter β,
ever if their dimension depends on n, we do not put subscript n.
f of β. Afterwards, we will
We will first find the convergence rate of the quantile estimator β
n
propose for β an adaptive group LASSO quantile estimator. Even though the number p diverges as
n → ∞, this estimator keeps the oracle properties.
Since the design size depends on n, we need reconsider the assumptions on Xi . Then, let us
consider the following assumptions for the errors (εi ), design (Xi ) and for the number p of groups:
(A3) (εi )1≤i≤n are i.i.d. Let F be the distribution function and f be the density function of (εi ). The
density function f is continuously, strictly positive in a neighbourhood of zero and has a bounded
first derivative in the neighbourhood of 0. The τ th quantile of εi is zero: τ = F (0). P
(A4) There
constants 0 < m0 ≤ M0 < ∞, such that m0 ≤ λmin (n−1 ni=1 Xi Xti ) ≤
Pnexist two
−1
t
λmax (n
i=1 Xi Xi ) ≤ M0 .
1/2
(A5) (p/n) max16i6n kXi k → 0, as n → ∞.
(A6) p is such that p = O(nc ), with 0 < c < 1.
Since p → ∞, condition (5) of assumption (A2) for the case p fixed is now replaced by f ′ bounded
in the neighborhood of 0. This assumption also been considered for always high-dimensional quantile model, with seamless L0 penalty by Ciuperca (2015). In Ciuperca (2015), assumptions (A4) and
(A5) are also required. Assumption (A6) was considered by Zhang and Xiang (2015) for an highdimensional linear model where the objective function is the error squares sum, penalized with
Adaptive group LASSO selection in quantile models
7
an adaptive group LASSO penalty. Assumptions (A4), (A5), (A6) are also required for an highdimensional linear model by Zou and Zhang (2009), which penalize the LS process with adaptive
elastic-net penalty. In respect to the case p fixed, assumptions (A4) and (A5) are the similar of (A1).
We will start by finding the convergence rate of quantile estimator (2) in the case p → ∞ as
n → ∞. For this, consider the quantile process:
Gn (β) ≡
n
X
i=1
ρτ (Yi − Xti β).
For the quantile estimator existence, we assume that the total number r of parameters is strictly
less than n.
e is of
We recall that in the case p fixed, the convergence rate of the quantile estimator β
n
−1/2
order n
(see for example Koenker (2005)). We will show that, the quantile estimator has the
convergence of order (p/n)1/2 , when the explanatory group variable number diverges with the
e depends only of p and
sample size. In view of the proof of Lemma 1, the convergence rate of β
n
not of total number r of parameters, thanks to assumption (A5). One needs the convergence rate
of the quantile estimator is necessary for studying the asymptotic behaviour of the penalty which
intervenes in adaptive group LASSO quantile process.
pp
e − β 0 k = OP
Lemma 1 Under assumptions (A3)-(A6), we have kβ
n
n .
Consider now the following adaptive group LASSO quantile (ag LASSO Q ) estimator:
p
X
∗
1
b ≡ arg min Gn (β) + λn
ω
bn;j kβj k ,
β
n
n
β∈Rd
j=1
where λn is a tuning parameter (positive) and the weights of the LASSO penalty are ω
bn;j ≡
e k−γ , with γ > 0. The relation between the tuning parameter µn of relation (3) for the case
kβ
n;j
p fixed and λn for the case p depending on n is λn = µn /n. We prefer to consider these forms as
tuning parameter and as objective process, for having a similarity with the adaptive group LASSO
LS (ag LASSO LS ) case considered by Zhang and Xiang (2015).
b ∗ we need to impose an additional condition on
In order to study the asymptotic normality of β
n
the total number of nonzero parameters. More precisely, r0 it is assumed to be the same order as
p0 . This is for controlling the penalty, so that it is smaller than the quantile process.
Concerning the size of the nonzero parameter vectors, we take the following assumption:
(A7) r0 = O(p0 ).
For the smallest nonzero vector norm and on constant c of assumption (A6) we assume:
(A8) Let us denote h0 ≡ min16j6p0 kβ0j k. There exists a constant M > 0 such that M ≤ n−α h0
and α > (c − 1)/2.
These two assumptions were also found in the paper Zhang and Xiang (2015), for ag LASSO LS
method in high-dimensional linear model, but with a supplementary condition for r: r = O(p).
Here, we do not need this requirement, since assumption (A5) is imposed. On the other hand, in
8
GABRIELA CIUPERCA
Zhang and Xiang (2015), instead of assumption (A5) the condition n−1/2 max16i6n kXi,A k2 → 0,
as n → ∞, is required.
The following theorem gives the convergence rate of the ag LASSO Q estimator when p → ∞.
We obtain the same convergence rate that of quantile estimator when group number diverges. This
convergence rate is also obtained by Zhang and Xiang (2015) for the ag LASSO LS estimator, but
for errors (ε)16i6n with mean zero and bounded variance.
Theorem 3 Under assumptions (A3)-(A6), (A8) and the tuning parameter (λn )n∈N satisfying
pp
b ∗ − β 0 k = OP
λn n(1+c)/2−αγ → 0, as n → ∞, we have kβ
n
n .
The following theorem shows the oracle properties for ag LASSO Q estimator when the number
p of groups diverges. We denote by Xi,A a r0 -vector which contains the sub-vectors Xi,j , for j ∈
{1, · · · , p0 }.
Theorem 4 Suppose that assumptions (A3)-(A6), (A8) are satisfied and also that the tuning pa(1−c)(1+γ)/2
rameter
→ ∞, λn n(c+1)/2−αγ → 0, as n → ∞. Then:
h satisfies
i λn n
∗
(i) P Abn = A → 1, for n → ∞.
(ii) If moreover assumption (A7) holds, then, for any vector u of size r0 such that kuk = 1, with
Pn
∗
√
L
−1/2 t b
notation Υn,A ≡ n−1 i=1 Xi,A Xti,A , we have n(ut Υ−1
u (β n − β0 )A −→ N 0, τ (1 −
n,A u)
n→∞
τ )f −2 (0) .
For the tuning parameter λn , the same conditions are required in Zhang and Xiang (2015) such
that, the ag LASSO LS estimator in an high-dimensional linear model satisfies the oracle properties.
e k−γ , with β
e
Remark 2 As for the case p fixed, we considered the weight ω
bn;j = kβ
n;j
n;j the quantile
estimator of the dj -vector β j , for any j = 1, · · · , p. In view of the proof of Theorem 4, the oracle
1/2
e
properties for ag LASSO Q estimator remain true also when β
n;j is replaced by any (p/n)
estimator of β j , under assumptions (A3)-(A6).
Remark 3 If h0 , defined in assumption (A8), doesn’t depend on n, then α = 0. In this case, the
conditions required on (λn )n∈N in Theorem 3 imply γ > 2c/(1 − c), and then γ can take values in
the interval (0, ∞). The value of γ increase with that of c ∈ (0, 1). For example, if c = 1/2 then
γ > 2.
5 Simulations
In order to evaluate the performance of the proposed estimation method, Monte Carlo simulations are realized in this section. To assess this performance we compare the ag LASSO Q and
ag LASSO LS estimation methods.
The design Xi is generated in the same way as in paper Wei and Huang (2010): X = (X1 , · · · , Xp ),
with the group explanatory variables Xj = (X5(j−1)+1 , · · · , X5j ), for all j = 1, · · · , p. We first
generate r = 5p independent random variables R1 , · · · , Rr of standard normal distribution. We
Adaptive group LASSO selection in quantile models
9
also generate the variables Zj of multivariate normal distribution with mean zero and covariance
Cov(Zj1 , Zj2 ) = 0.9|j1 −j2 | . Finally, the variables X1 , · · · , Xr are generated as:
X5(j−1)+k =
Zj + R5(j−1)+k
√
,
2
1 ≤ j ≤ p,
1 ≤ k ≤ 5.
Two model errors are considered: Normal N (0, 32 ) and Cauchy C(0, 32 ). For the parameters we
take: β01 = (0.5, 1, 1.5, 1, 0.5), β02 = (1, 1, 1, 1, 1), β03 = (−1, 0, 1, 2, 1.5), β04 = (−1.5, 1, 0.5, 0.5, 0.5)
and all other parameters are zero vectors. The nonzero vectors were also considered in Example 2
of Wei and Huang (2010) for errors N (0, 32 ), p = 10, when the parameters were estimated by LS
method with adaptive group LASSO penalty.
The constant c of assumption (A6) is c = 0.43. Then, we will consider the following value couples for n and p: (30, 5), (60, 5), (60, 10), (100, 10), (200, 10), (400, 15), (1000, 25) and (1000, 100).
On
hand, p0 will always be equal to 4. The response variable Y is generated as: Yi =
Pp the tother
0
j=1 Xij β j + εi , for i = 1, · · · , n.
We will compare the obtained results by the adaptive group LASSO quantile method, proposed in
this paper, with those obtained by the adaptive group LASSO LS method, proposed by Wei and Huang
(2010), Zhang and Xiang (2015).
For simulations, we used the R language. After a scale transformation, we can use the group LASSO
methods instead of the adaptive LASSO group methods. Then, in order to calculate the adaptive
group LASSO LS estimations we have used the function grpreg of package grpreg, the tuning parameter being chosen on a value grid, using the AIC criterion. In order to calculate the adaptive
group LASSO quantile estimations, we have used the function groupQICD of package rqPen and
the tuning parameter varies on a value grid.
For each considered case, 1000 Monte Carlo replications was made.
In Table 1 we give how the two estimation methods identify the parameter vectors (zero or
nonzero), for the part that contains the four nonzero parameter vectors β0j , j = 1, · · · , 4, and
for the part with p − 4 zero vectors. We present the minimum, three quartiles (Q1, median, Q3),
the mean and the maximum of the number of nonzero vectors (j = 1, · · · , 4), respectively, zero
(j = 5, · · · , p), found by the two estimation methods.
For n large (equal to 100, 200, 400, 1000), we observe that for errors of N (0, 32 ) law, the two
estimation methods well identify the zero and nonzero parameter vectors. However, for Cauchy errors, the ag LASSO LS method poorly identifies nonzero vectors (the group of the four significant
variables). The zero vectors are very well identified by the two methods.
For n small (equal to 30 or 60), the two estimation methods well identify the four relevant variable groups, that errors are Normal or Cauchy (except for ag LASSO Q, in the case n = 60,
p = 5, ε ∼ C(0, 32 )). However, the (p − 4) irrelevant variable groups are not well identified by the
ag LASSO LS method.
Conclusion
For gaussian errors, the ag LASSO LS method identifies well the two (relevant and irrelevant)
variable groups for n large. For n small, the irrelevant variable groups are not well identified. For
Cauchy errors, this method, either does not identify the relevant variable groups or irrelevant variable groups, regardless of the value n. Then, for Cauchy errors, the ag LASSO LS estimations do
not have the sparsity property.
10
GABRIELA CIUPERCA
The ag LASSO Q method, for the two types of errors, identifies the two variable groups (significant and irrelevant), the precision increasing with n. Then, the ag LASSO Q estimations have the
sparsity property.
We conclude then that the simulations confirm the theoretical results for the ag LASSO Q estimators.
6 Proofs
In this section we provide the proofs of all results presented in Sections 3 and 4.
6.1 Proofs for results of Section 3
Proof of Theorem 1. The proof is similar to that of Theorem 4.1 of Zou and Yuan (2008).
√ b∗
√
0
b n , and in general n(β − β 0 ) ≡ u ≡ (u1 , · · · , up ), with uj =
We denote n(β
n − β ) ≡ u
(uj,1 , · · · , uj,dj ), for j = 1, · · · , p.
Since Yi = Xti β 0 + εi , then Yi − Xti β =
Xti u
√
n
+ εi . Let us consider the following random variables
Di ≡ (1 − τ )11εi <0 − τ 11εi ≥0 ,
n
1 X
Di ,
vn ≡ √
n i=1
√
n Z Xti u/ n
X
Bn (u) ≡
[11εi <t − 11εi <0 ]dt
i=1
and the random vector
(8)
0
n
1 X
Xi Di .
zn ≡ √
n i=1
Obviously, IE[Di ] = 0 et IE[zn ] = 0r . By the CLT, using assumptions (A1) and (A2), we have
L
zn −→ N (0r , τ (1 − τ )Υ),
n→∞
L
vn −→ N (0, τ (1 − τ )).
n→∞
(9)
b n is the minimizer of the following random process:
The vector u
Ln (u) ≡
p
n
X
X
Xt u
uj
ρτ εi − √i − ρτ (εi ) + µn
ω
bn;j β0j + √ − kβ 0j k ,
n
n
i=1
j=1
which can be written under the following form:
Ln (u) = [ztn u + Bn (u)] + µn
p
X
j=1
ω
bn;j
√
n
uj
β 0j + √
− kβ0j k √ .
n
n
(10)
We first study the last sum of the right hand side of (10).
For all j ≤ p0 (thus kβ0j k 6= 0) we have, since the quantile estimators are consistent:
P
ω
bn;j −→ kβ0j k−γ 6= 0
n→∞
(11)
30
5
60
5
60
10
100
10
200
10
400
15
1000
25
100
ε
C
N
C
N
C
N
C
N
C
N
C
N
C
N
C
N
min
LS
Q
0
0
4
3
0
1
4
3
0
0
4
3
0
3
4
3
0
3
4
3
0
3
4
3
0
4
4
4
0
3
4
3
Q1
LS
4
4
0
4
4
4
0
4
0
4
0
4
0
4
0
4
nonzero true parameter vectors
Q2
mean
Q3
Q
LS
Q
LS
Q
LS
3
4
3
3.5
3.3
4
4
4
4
4
3.8
4
3
1
4
1.3
3.6
4
4
4
4
4
3.9
4
3
4
4
3.4
3.5
4
4
4
4
4
3.9
4
4
0
4
0.9
3.9
1
4
4
4
4
3.9
4
3
0
4
0.5
3.7
1
4
4
4
4
3.9
4
3
0
4
0.4
3.6
11
4
4
4
4
3.99
4
4
0
4
0.5
4
1
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
0
4
0.3
3.5
0
4
4
4
4
3.98
4
Q
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
0
4
4
4
4
4
max
LS
Q
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
4
4
4
true
1
1
1
1
6
6
6
6
6
6
4
11
21
21
96
96
min
LS
Q
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
2
0
1
0
2
0
3
8
10
0
9
19
19
17
20
94
96
92
95
Q1
LS
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
6
0
11
9
21
20
96
95
zero true parameter vectors
Q2
mean
Q
LS
Q
LS
Q
0
0
1
0.1
0.7
0
0
1
0.01
0.5
1
1
1
0.7
0.8
0
0
1
0.1
0.7
5
0
5
0.8
5.2
4
0
4
0.06
4.3
4
6
5
5
5
4
0
5
2
4.4
6
6
6
5.7
5.7
5
4
6
3.1
5.5
11
11
11
10.8
10.9
11
10
11
9.3
10.8
21
21
21
20.8
20.7
21
21
21
20.3
20.9
96
96
96
95.8
96
96
96
96
95.4
96
Q3
LS
0
0
1
0
0
0
6
5
6
6
11
11
21
21
96
96
Q
1
1
1
1
6
5
6
5
6
6
11
11
21
21
96
96
max
LS
Q
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
11
11
11
11
21
21
21
21
96
96
96
96
Adaptive group LASSO selection in quantile models
p
11
Table 1 Model selection results by ag LASSO Q and ag LASSO LS methods for p0 = 4, c = 0.43, errors N (0, 32 )
or C(0, 32 ).
n
12
GABRIELA CIUPERCA
and by elementary calculus
utj β 0j
√ 0
n kβ j + n−1/2 uj k − kβ 0j k −→
.
n→∞ kβ 0 k
j
(12)
Then, using condition µn n−1/2 → 0, when n → ∞, taking into account relations (11) and (12), by
Slutsky’s Lemma, we have:
µn
p0
X
j=1
P
ω
bn;j kβ0j + n−1/2 uj k − kβ0j k −→ 0.
For j > p0 , we have β 0j = 0dj . Then:
assumption n
(γ−1)/2
(13)
n→∞
√ 0
P
n kβj + n−1/2 uj k − kβ0j k = kuj k. Since ω
bn;j −→ ∞, by
µn → ∞, we have n
n→∞
−1/2
P
µn ω
bn;j −→ ∞. Thus
n→∞
√
P
n
0, if uj = 0dj
µn ω
bn,j √ kβ0j + n−1/2 uj k − kβ0j k −→
∞, if kuj k =
6 0.
n→∞
n
(14)
Then, taking into account relations (13) and (14), we have the following result for the third term
of the right hand side of (10):
µn
p
X
j=1
with
ω
bn;j
√
p
n P X
uj
W (β0j , u),
− kβ0j k √ −→
β 0j + √
n
n n→∞ j=1
(15)
0
0, if β j 6= 0dj
W (β 0j , u) ≡ 0, if β 0j = 0dj and uj = 0dj
∞, if β 0j = 0dj and uj 6= 0dj .
On the other hand, by the two results of (9), we have for the first two terms of the right hand side
of (10), with z a random d-vector of law N (0d , τ (1 − τ )Υ), that
L
ztn u −→ zt u,
n→∞
P
Bn (u) −→
n→∞
1
f (0)ut Υu.
2
Taking into account these last two results and relation (15), then, Ln (u) of relation (10) has an
asymptotic distribution:
p
X
1
L
W (β 0j , u).
Ln (u) −→ zt u + f (0)ut Υu +
n→∞
2
j=1
b n = (b
b 2n ), where u
b 1n
Let us denote u =P
(u1 , u2 ) with u1 of size r0 , u2 of size r − r0 and u
u1n , u
p0
0
b n = arg minu∈Rr Ln (u), we obtain that
contains the first
j=1 dj = r elements of u. Since u
P
L
b 1n −→ N (0r0 , τ (1 − τ )f −2 (0)Υ−1
b 2n −→ 0r−r0 et u
u
A ).
n→∞
n→∞
Adaptive group LASSO selection in quantile models
13
√ b∗
L
0
Proof of Theorem 2. By Theorem 1, for all j ∈ A we have that n(β
n;j − β j ) −→ N (0dj , τ (1 −
−2
τ )f (0)ΥAj ) as n → ∞. The square matrix ΥAj of size dj × dj is the submatrix of Υ with the
row and column indices in {dj−1 + 1, dj−1 + 2, · · · , dj }, with d0 = 0. Since β0j 6= 0dj , then
lim P[A ⊆ Ab∗n ] = 1.
(16)
n→∞
To finish the proof we show that for all j 6∈ A we have P[j ∈ Ab∗n ] → 0 as n → ∞. Since j 6∈ A, then
β 0j = 0dj . Considering the Eucildean norm for equalities (6) we have with probability one, since we
suppose j ∈ Ab∗n , that:
µn ω
bn;j < 2k
n
X
i=1
Xij k ≤ 2
n
X
i=1
kXij k = 2
n
X
i=1
dj
X
k=1
1/2
2
Xij,k
.
By the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, we have that,
1/2
1/2
dj
dj
n
n
X
X
X
X
1
1
2
2
Xij,k
Xij,k
≤
=
n
n
i=1
i=1
k=1
k=1
n
1X
kXij k2
n i=1
!1/2
.
Then, taking into account assumption (A1), there exists a bounded constant C1 > 0 such that
1
µn ω
bn;j < 2
n
n
1X
kXij k2
n i=1
!1/2
≤ C1 < ∞.
(17)
On the other hand, left-hand side of inequality (17), can be written:
µn ω
bn;j
µn
nγ/2
=
.
e kγ n
n
nγ/2 kβ
n;j
Since we have supposed that j ∈ Ab∗n and j 6∈ A, we have that for all ǫ > 0, there exists ηǫ > 0
e k−1 > ηǫ ] > 1 − ǫ. The last two relations, together with the supposition
such that P[n−1/2 kβ
n;j
γ/2−1
n
µn → ∞, imply, for all constant A > 0,
lim P
n→∞
µn ω
bn;j
> A = 1.
n
(18)
Then, relations (17) and (18) are in contradiction. Thus
lim P[j ∈ Ac ∩ Ab∗n ] = 0.
n→∞
The theorem follows from relations (16) and (19).
(19)
14
GABRIELA CIUPERCA
6.2 Proofs for results of Section 4
Proof of Lemma 1. We show that for all ǫ > 0, there exists a constant Bǫ > 0 (without loss of
generality, we consider Bǫ > 0, otherwise we take |Bǫ |) large enough such that for n large enough:
r
p
0
0
P inf Gn β + Bǫ
u > Gn (β ) ≥ 1 − ǫ.
(20)
n
kuk=1
For this, we consider for some constant C > 0, the expectation of the difference:
r
r
X
n
p
p t
IE ρτ εi − C
IE Gn β 0 + C
u − Gn (β 0 ) =
Xi u − ρτ (εi )
n
n
i=1
=
n
X
IE
i=1
"Z
C
√p
#
t
n Xi u
110<εi <t dt =
0
n Z
X
i=1
0
C
√p
t
n Xi u
[F (t) − F (0)] dt.
(21)
p
By assumption (A6) we have p/n → 0. Moreover, by assumption (A5), we have that np Xti u = o(1),
for kuk = 1. Thus, by mean value theorem and since the density f has a bounded first derivative
in the neighbourhood of 0, relation (21) becomes:
!
n
n
pX t t
f (0) 2 p X t 2
(X u) + o
u (Xi Xi )u .
C
=
2
n i=1 i
n i=1
Then, taking into account assumption (A4),
r
n
X
p
1
0
0
2 f (0) p 1
(Xt u)2 (1 + o(1)).
IE Gn β + C
u − Gn (β ) = C
n
n
2 n n i=1 i
(22)
Let be the following random variable
r
r
p t
p
Xi u − ρτ (εi ) − C
Di Xti u
Ri ≡ ρτ εi − C
n
n
and the following random vector
Wn ≡ C
r
n
pX
Di Xti ,
n i=1
with the random variable Di defined by (8). The vector Wn is the similar of the vector zn when p
was fixed. Then, the process Gn can be written:
r
r
n
X
p
p
[Ri − IE[Ri ]].
Gn β 0 + C
u − Gn (β 0 ) = IE Gn β 0 + C
u − Gn (β 0 ) + Wn u +
n
n
i=1
(23)
First all, remark that
n
kuk2 λmin
1
1X t
1
u Xi Xti u ≤ kuk2 λmax Xi Xti .
Xi Xti ≤
n
n i=1
n
(24)
Adaptive group LASSO selection in quantile models
15
Since the errors (εi )16i6n are independent, using also |Ri | < C
with assumption (A5), we obtain
pp
n
|Xti u| 11|εi |<C √ p |Xt u| , together
n
i
r
r
i
h
p
p
√
kXi k ≤ C
max kXi k = o(1),
IE 11|εi |<C p |Xt u| ≤ C
i
n
n
n 16i6n
which imply, since (εi )16i6n are i.i.d.,
"
n
X
[Ri − IE[Ri ]]
IE
i=1
#2
=
n
X
i=1
IE[Ri − IE[Ri ]]2 ≤
n
X
IE[R2i ]
i=1
and by assumptions (A3), (A5) together with relation (24), we have
i
pX t 2 h
≤C
|Xi u| IE 11|εi |<C √ p |Xt u| = o
i
n
n i=1
n
2
n
pX t
u Xi Xti u
n i=1
!
= o(p).
(25)
For the last relation we have used assumption (A4).P
Let be the following random variable Un ≡ p−1/2 ni=1 [Ri − IE[Ri ]]. Then, relation (25) implies
IE[Un2 ] = o(1). This, together with IE[Un ] = 0, imply, by the Bienaymé-Tchebychev inequality, that
P
P
Un −→ 0. Thus ni=1 [Ri − IE[Ri ]] = oP (p1/2 ). Then, relation (23) becomes
n→∞
r
r
p
p
0
0
0
u − Gn (β ) = IE Gn β + C
u − Gn (β 0 ) + Wn u + oP (p1/2 )
Gn β + C
n
n
which is equal to, using (22):
"
f (0)
= C2
p
2
n
1X t
u Xi Xti u
n i=1
!
n
X
Di Xti
√
+C p
n
i=1
√
(26)
! #
u (1 + oP (1)) + oP (p1/2 ).
Since P
IE[Di ] = 0, V ar[Di Xti u] = τ (1 − τ )ut Xi Xti u and kuk = 1, then, using (24), we have that
n
−1/2
t
n
i=1 Di Xi u converges in law to a centred Gaussian distribution. Taking into account assumptions (A4) and (A6), for B large enough, we obtain
!
r
n
X
1
p
Gn β 0 + B
ut Xi Xti u (1 + oP (1)) > 0,
(27)
u − Gn (β 0 ) = B 2 f (0)p
n
n i=1
for n large enough. Thus, relation (20) follows taking into account assumptions (A3) and (A4).
Proof of Theorem 3. We have the following inequality, with probability 1, for the quantile
e :
estimator β
n;j
e − β 0 k + min kβ
e k.
min kβ0j k ≤ max kβ
n;j
j
n;j
j∈A
j∈A
j∈A
e − β 0 k = OP ((p/n)1/2 )) = OP (n(c−1)/2 ). On the other
By Lemma 1, we have that maxj∈A kβ
n;j
j
hand, we denoted in assumption (A8), h0 = minj∈A kβ0j k. Then, we have with probability one,
16
GABRIELA CIUPERCA
e k and taking into account assumption (A8): M ≤
h0 n−α ≤ OP (n(c−1)/2−α ) + n−α minj∈A kβ
n;j
e k. Hence:
oP (1) + n−α minj∈A kβ
n;j
M nα
e
lim P min kβn;j k >
= 1.
n→∞
j∈A
2
(28)
We consider the r-vector u such that kuk = 1. Similarly to Theorem 2.1 of Zhang and Xiang (2015),
we have, for a constant B,
p
X
j=1
e k
kβ
n;j
−γ
r
r p0
r
X
p0
p
p
pX e
0
0
0
0
−γ
e
kβj + B
kβn;j k
kβn;j k−γ kuj k.
uj k − kβj k ≥
uj k − kβj k ≥ −B
kβj + B
n
n
n
j=1
j=1
Since kuk = 1, taking into account relation (28), applying the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, we obtain
−
r
p0
p X e
kβ k−γ kuj k ≥ −
λn
n j=1 n;j
r
p0
X
p
e k−2γ 1/2 kuk ≥ −
kβ
λn
n;j
n
j=1
r
and by assumption λn n(1+c)/2−αγ −→ 0, we obtain:
n→∞
= OP
p
n
r
√
√
λn p0
p
p λn p0
γ ≥ −
α γ
e k
n minj∈A kβ
n Mn
n;j
2
.
(29)
The Theorem is proved if we have the similar of inequality (20) for
r
r
r
p
X
p
p
p
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
λn ω
bn;j kβj +
Gn β + B
u − Gn (β )+
Buj k − kβj k ≡ Qn β + B
u −Qn (β 0 ).
n
n
n
n
n
j=1
We show that for all ǫ > 0 there exists Bǫ large enough, such that, for any n large enough
r
p
0
0
u > Qn (β ) > 1 − ǫ.
P inf Qn β + Bǫ
n
kuk=1
(30)
By the definition of Qn , we have for all constant B > 0, that
r
r
r
p
X
p
p
p
1
1
Qn β 0 + B
λn ω
bn,j kβ0j +
u −Qn (β 0 ) = Gn β 0 + B
u − Gn (β 0 )+
Buj k − kβ0j k
n
n
n
n
n
j=1
and using relations (27) and (29)
p
> B f (0)
n
2
!
n
p
1X t
t
u Xi Xi u (1 + oP (1)) − BOP
.
n i=1
n
Relation (30) follows from the last relation, for n and B large enough and using assumption (A4).
b ∗ belongs, with a probability converging
Proof of Theorem 4. (i) By
Theorem 3, we have
that β
n
p
to one, to the set: Vp (β 0 ) ≡ β; kβ − β 0 k ≤ B np , with B > 0 large enough as in relation (30).
Adaptive group LASSO selection in quantile models
17
For p > p0 , we show that for all β = (β A , β Ac ) ∈ Vp (β 0 ) such that kβA − β 0A k = O
all constant C ∈ (0, B), we have
Qn (β A , 0p−p0 ) =
pp
n
min √ Qn (βA , βAc ),
kβ Ac k≤C
and for
(31)
p
n
with a probability tending to one, as sample
size n → ∞.
Let us consider the parameter set Wn ≡ β ∈ Vp (β 0 ); kβAc k > 0 .
b ∗ ∈ Wn ] → 0, as n → ∞. For this, we firstly consider two parameter vectors
We show that P[β
n
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
β = (β A , βAc ) ∈ Wn and β(1) = (β A , β Ac ) ∈ Vp (β 0 ), such that βA = β A and β Ac = 0d−d0 .
Let us take the difference of the objective random process for the two parameter vectors. We denote
this difference Dn (β, β (1) ):
Dn (β, β (1) ) ≡ Qn (β) − Qhn (β (1) )
i P
Pn
p
bn;j kβ j k.
= n−1 i=1 ρτ (Yi − Xti β) − ρτ (Yi − Xti β(1) ) + j=p0 +1 λn ω
(32)
From Knight (1998), we have the following identity, for any x, y ∈ R:
Z y
(11x≤t − 11x≤0 )dt.
ρτ (x − y) − ρτ (x) = y(11x≤0 − τ ) +
0
Using this relation for the first sum of (32), we obtain:
n
n
X
1
1 X
Xi [11Yi −Xti β(1) ≤0 − τ ]
ρτ (Yi − Xti β) − ρτ (Yi − Xti β (1) ) = (β − β (1) )t
n i=1
n
i=1
(1)
n Z t
1 X Xi (β−β )
+
[11Yi −Xti β(1) ≤t − 11Yi −Xti β(1) ≤0 ]dt ≡ T1n + T2n .
n i=1 0
(33)
For T1n , since the density f is bounded in a neighbourhood of 0, we have, by assumption (A5),
that:
n
IE[T1n ] = (β−β(1) )t
n
f (0) X
1X
Xi [F (Xti (β (1) −β0 ))−F (0)] = (β−β (1) )t
Xi Xti (β 0 −β(1) )(1+o(1)).
n i=1
n i=1
Pn
Then,
|IE[T1n ]| ≤ kβ − β (1) k · n−1 i=1 Xi Xti · kβ0 − β(1) kf (0)(1 + o(1)). Since P
the matrix
P
n
n
n−1 i=1 Xi Xti is Hermitian, we have, taking into account assumption (A4), that n−1 k i=1 Xi Xti k
Pn
(1)
0
(1)
−1
t
= λmax (n
k·kβ −β k. Therefore
i=1 Xi Xi ) ≤ M0 . Hence, we have |IE[T1n ]| ≤ M0 f (0)kβ−β
(1) 2
IE[T1n ] = O(kβ − β k ). By calculations analogous to IE[T1n ], using independence of (εi )16i6n ,
2
2
we have that IE[T1n
] = Cn−1 kβ − β(1) k3 → 0, for n → ∞. Since V ar[T1n ] ≤ IE[T1n
], using the
Bienaymé-Tchebychev inequality, we have:
e 2 (1 + oP (1)).
T1n = Ckβ − βk
(34)
Consider now T2n of relation (33), which can be written as:
T2n = n
−1
n Z
X
i=1
0
Xti (β−β(1) )
[11εi ≤t−Xt (β0 −β(1) ) − 11εi ≤−Xt (β0 −β(1) ) ]dt.
i
i
18
GABRIELA CIUPERCA
Taking into account that β ∈ Vp (β 0n ), together with assumptions (A3), (A5), we get IE[T2n ] =
Pn R Xt (β−β(1) )
Pn R Xt (β−β(1) )
n−1 i=1 0 i
[F (t−Xti (β 0 −β(1) ))−F (−Xti (β 0 −β(1) ))]dt = n−1 i=1 0 i
[tf (Xti (β (1)
0
−β )) + o(t)]dt.
By the proof of Lemma 1, assumptions (A3), (A5), we obtain that f (Xti (β (1) − β 0 )) P
is bounded by
a constant C > 0. Thus, as for T1n , using assumption (A4) and the fact that n−1 ni=1 kXi k2 −
P
P
P
tr n−1 ni=1 Xi Xti −→ 0, we have |IE[T2n ]| ≤ Cn−1 ni=1 kXi k2 kβ−β(1) k·kβ(1) −β0 k+o n−1 ni=1
n→∞
2
Xti (β − β(1) ) = Ckβ − β (1) k2 . We show similarly that IE[T2n
] = Cn−1 kβ − β(1) k3 . Then, by the
Bienaymé-Tchebychev inequality, we get:
T2n = Ckβ − β(1) k2 (1 + oP (1)).
(35)
Hence, by relations (34), (35), we obtain
T1n + T2n = Ckβ − β(1) k2 (1 + oP (1)).
(36)
This last relation together with relations (33), (36), give for relation (32):
Dn (β, β
(1)
) = Ckβ − β
(1) 2
k (1 + oP (1)) +
p
X
j=p0 +1
On the other hand, by Lemma 1, we have
ω
bn;j =
1
e kγ
kβ
n;j
=
λn ω
bn;j kβj k.
p −γ/2
= OP
n
− β 0j kγ
1
e
kβ
n;j
and moreover for all j ≥ p0 + 1, since β ∈ Wn ⊆ Vp (β 0 ) we have 0 < kβj k = O
p
X
j=p0 +1
Thus
Dn (β, β(1) )
kβ − β (1) k
λn ω
bn;j kβj k =
p
X
λn OP
j=p0 +1
≥ Ckβ − β (1) k(1 + oP (1)) +
p (1−γ)/2
.
n
p
X
λn OP
j=p0 +1
pp
n . Then
p −γ/2
n
.
1/2
We have that kβ−β(1) k = O np
. Since p/n = O(nc−1 ), under the assumption that λn n(1−c)(1+γ)/2 →
∞, as n → ∞, and p > p0 , we have
Dn (β, β (1) )
kβ − β(1) k
≥ λn OP nγ(1−c)/2 .
(37)
To finish the proof of relation (31), consider now other two parameter vectors: β 0 the true value
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
and β(1) a parameter such that β (1) ≡ (β A , βAc ), β A = βA , βAc = β 0Ac = 0d−d0 . We obtain as
for (36) that:
Dn (β 0 , β(1) ) = n−1
n h
i
X
ρτ (Yi − Xti β 0 ) − ρτ (Yi − Xti β (1) ) = Ck(β 0 − β (1) )A k2 (1 + oP (1)).
i=1
Adaptive group LASSO selection in quantile models
19
Then
Dn (β 0 , β(1) )
kβ 0 − β(1) k
0
= Ck(β − β
(1)
)A k(1 + oP (1)) = OP
p 1/2
n
= OP n(c−1)/2 .
(38)
Since λn n(1−c)(1+γ)/2 → ∞ as n → ∞, we have that (37) is much bigger than (38), for n large
enough. Then, relation (31) follows.
To finish the proof of (i), we will show that
b ∗ k > 0 = 1.
lim P min kβ
(39)
n;j
n→∞
j∈A
b ∗ −β0 k. By Theorem
b ∗ k ≥ minj∈A kβ0 k−maxj∈A kβ
With probability 1, we have that: minj∈A kβ
n;j
j
n;j
j
3 and assumption (A8), we have,
∗
M
−α
b
lim P n min kβn;j k ≥
= 1,
n→∞
j∈A
2
which implies
b ∗ k > 0 = 1,
lim P n−α min kβ
n;j
n→∞
j∈A
from which relation (39) follows. Relations (39) and (31) imply (i).
b ∗ can be written with a
(ii) Taking into account claim (i) and assumption (A7), the estimator β
n
p
∗
b = β 0 + p δ, with δ = (δ A , δ Ac ), δ Ac = 0r−r0 , kδ A k ≤ C. Then
probability converging to 1 as β
n
n
r
r
n
1X
p
p
ρτ Yi − Xti (β 0 +
Qn β 0 +
δ − Qn (β 0 ) =
δ) − ρτ (εi ) + P,
(40)
n
n i=1
n
λn ω
bn;j kβ j k − kβ0j k .
p
b ∗ k − kβ0 k = C p δ t β0 , with a probability converging to 1.
For all j ∈ {1, · · · , p0 } we have kβ
n;j
j
n j j
with P ≡
Pp0
j=1
On the other hand, using assumption (A8) and Lemma 1 we have for the quantile estimators
r
p
e k = kβ 0 k + OP
kβ
≥ h0 + OP n−(1−c)/2 = O(nα ) + OP n−(1−c)/2 = O(nα ).
n;j
j
n
Thus, we have ω
bn;j ≤ OP (n−αγ ), for all j ∈ A. Then, for the the second term on the right hand
side of (40), we have with a probability converging to one:
r
r
p0
p0
X
X
p
p t 0
0
0
−αγ
λn ω
bn;j kβj +
|P| =
λn
δ j k − kβj k ≤ Cn
δ j βj
n
n
j=1
j=1
r
r
p0
p X
p 0
0
−αγ
kδ j k · kβ j k ≤ C
λn
r λn n−αγ = Cr0 λn n(c−1)/2−αγ .
(41)
≤ Cn
n j=1
n
We study now the first term of the right hand side of (40), which can be written as:
r
n
1X
p
0
t
ρτ Yi − Xi β +
δ
− ρτ (εi )
n i=1
n
20
GABRIELA CIUPERCA
1
=
n
r
n
n
pX t
1X
Xi δ[11ε≤0 − τ ] +
n i=1
n i=1
Z √ np Xti δ
0
[11εi ≤t − 11εi ≤0 ]dt ≡ J1 + J2 .
Since IE[J1 ] = 0, using assumption (A5) and the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, we have:
V ar[J1 ] ≤ IE[J12 ] =
n
n
X
X
p
p
1 p
t 2
kXi,A k2 kδ A k2 ≤ C 3 n max kXi,A k2 −→ 0.
(X
δ)
≤
τ
(1−τ
)
τ
(1−τ
)
i
2
3
n→∞
n n
n
n 1≤i≤n
i=1
i=1
Using assumption (A2), we have for the expectation of J2 :
Z √ np Xti δ
n
1
f (0) p t 1 X
Xi Xti δ(1 + o(1)).
IE[J2 ] =
δ
(tf (0) + o(t2 ))dt =
n 0
2 n n i=1
(42)
Using assumption (A4) and relation (24), we have that
f (0)pn−1 kδk22 λmin n−1
n
X
i=1
Taking into account the fact that
n
X
Xi Xti .
Xi Xti ≤ IE[J2 ] ≤ f (0)pn−1 kδk22 λmax n−1
i=1
kδk22
kδ A k22
≤ C, we have:
p
IE[J2 ] = Cf (0) .
n
p 3/2
→ 0, as n → ∞.
n
=
(43)
Similarly we obtain V ar[J2 ] = O n1
But IE[J2 ] = O nc−1 and by assumption (A7), together with relation (41), we have |P| ≤
|P|
= OP λn n(c+1)/2−αγ → 0 and thus
OP λn nc n(c−1)/2−αγ = OP λn n(3c−1)/2−αγ . Then IE[J
2]
IE[J2 ] ≫ |P|.
p
Hence, minimizing (40) amounts to minimizing J1 + J2 , with respect to np δ. Using relation (42),
we obtain:
pp n
r
n
X
p
f (0) p t
1X
0
t
n
δ))− ρτ (εi )] =
δ Υn,A δ A (1 + oP (1)).
[ρτ (Yi − Xi (β n +
Xti,A δ A [11εi <0 − τ ]+
n i=1
n
n i=1
2 n A
The minimizer of the right hand side of the last equation is:
r
n
X
p
1 1
Xi,A (11εi ≤0 − τ ) .
δA = −
Υ−1
n,A
n
n f (0)
i=1
(44)
For studying (44), let us consider the following independent random variable sequence, for i =
1, · · · , n,
Wi ≡ (f (0))−1 ut Υ−1
n,A XiA (11εi ≤0 − τ ),
Pn
0
with u a vector of dimension r , such that kuk2 = 1. We have that IE[Wi ] = 0 and i=1 V ar[Wi ] =
nτ (1 − τ )(f (0))−2 ut Υ−1
n,A u. Then, by CLT for independent random variable sequences (Wi )16i6n ,
we have
b − β0 )
√
ut (β
L
A
A
−→ N (0, 1).
(45)
nf (0) q
n→∞
−1
t
τ (1 − τ )(u Υn,A u)
p
b − β 0 = p δ A , together with relations
Claim (ii) results by taking into account of the fact that β
A
A
n
(44), (45).
Adaptive group LASSO selection in quantile models
21
References
Ciuperca, G., (2015). Model selection in high-dimensional quantile regression with seamless L0 penalty. Statistics
and Probability Letters, 107, 313-323.
Ciuperca, G., (2016). Adaptive LASSO model selection in a multiphase quantile regression. Statistics, DOI:
10.1080/02331888.2016.1151427.
Guo, X., Zhang, H., Wang, Y., Wu, J.L., (2015). Model selection and estimation in high dimensional regression
models with group SCAD. Statistics and Probability Letters, 103, 86-92.
Huang, J., Breheny, P., Ma, S., (2012). A selective review of group selection in high-dimensional models. Statistical
Science, 27, No. 4, 481-499.
Knight, K., (1998). Limiting distributions for L1 regression estimators under general conditions. The Annals of
Statistics, 26, 755-770.
Koenker, R., (2005). Quantile Regression. Cambridge University Press.
Nardi, Y., Rinaldo, A., (2008). On the asymptotic properties of the group lasso estimator for linear models. Electronic
Journal of Statistics, 2, 605-633.
Xu, X., Ghosh, M., (2015). Bayesian variable selection and estimation for group Lasso. Bayesian Analysis, 10(4),
909-936.
Yuan, M., Lin, Y., (2006). Model selection and estimation in regression with grouped variables. J. R. Statist. Soc.
B, 68(1), 49-67.
Zhang, C., Xiang, Y., (2015). On the oracle property of adaptive group LASSO in high-dimensional linear models.
Statistical Papers, 57(1), 249-265.
Zou, H., Yuan, M., (2008). Composite quantile regression and the oracle model selection theory. The Annals of
Statistics, 36(3), 1108-1126.
Zou, H., Zhang, H.H., (2009). On the adaptive elastic-net with a diverging number of parameters. The Annals of
Statistics, 37(4), 1733-1751.
Wang, H., Leng, C., (2008). A note on adaptive group lasso. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 52,
5277-5286.
Wang, L., You, Y., Lian, H., (2015). Convergence and sparsity of Lasso and group Lasso in high-dimensional
generalized linear models. Statistical Papers, 56, No. 3, 819-828.
Wei, F., Huang, J., (2010). Consistent group selection in high-dimensional linear model. Bernoulli, 16(4), 1369-1384.
Wu, Y., Liu, Y., (2009). Variable selection in quantile regression. Statistica Sinica, 19, 801-817.
| 10math.ST
|
arXiv:1705.06390v2 [cs.AI] 24 Oct 2017
Scalable Exact Parent Sets Identification in Bayesian Networks Learning
with Apache Spark
Subhadeep Karan
Jaroslaw Zola
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
University at Buffalo
Buffalo, NY, USA
Email: [email protected]
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Department of Biomedical Informatics
University at Buffalo
Buffalo, NY, USA
Email: [email protected]
Abstract—In Machine Learning, the parent set identification
problem is to find a set of random variables that best explain
selected variable given the data and some predefined scoring
function. This problem is a critical component to structure
learning of Bayesian networks and Markov blankets discovery,
and thus has many practical applications, ranging from fraud
detection to clinical decision support.
In this paper, we introduce a new distributed memory
approach to the exact parent sets assignment problem. To
achieve scalability, we derive theoretical bounds to constraint
the search space when MDL scoring function is used, and we
reorganize the underlying dynamic programming such that the
computational density is increased and fine-grain synchronization is eliminated. We then design efficient realization of our
approach in the Apache Spark platform. Through experimental
results, we demonstrate that the method maintains strong
scalability on a 500-core standalone Spark cluster, and it can
be used to efficiently process data sets with 70 variables, far
beyond the reach of the currently available solutions.
1. Introduction
In Machine Learning, the parent set assignment problem is to find a set of random variables that best explain
a selected variable given input data and some predefined
scoring criterion [1]. It is a precursor to Bayesian networks
structure learning, where it is solved for each variable to
produce a list of potential predecessors of that variable in a
final network, which reduces the number of structures that
have to be considered [2], [3], [4]. It is also closely related to
the feature selection problem, since it directly translates into
Markov blankets discovery [5]. Because of these connections, the problem has many practical applications spanning
clinical decision support systems, risk assessment, strategic
planning, fraud detection and many others [6], [7], [8], [9].
In all these applications, random variables model attributes
of interest, their realizations are observed from data, and
a model obtained by solving the parent set assignment
provides insights into how different attributes depend on
each other, including conditional dependencies.
While the parent set identification is critical to building
models like Bayesian networks, it is known to be formally
hard for the most commonly used scoring functions. For
instance, it is N P -complete for the Normalized Maximum
Likelihood (NML) criterion [1]. Consequently, the current
approaches, which we briefly review in Section 5, either depend on heuristics or deliver exact solutions but are limited
in how large instances they can solve. In fact, the largest
problems solved by exact algorithms do not contain more
than 40 variables [10]. In contrast, the real-world systems
that strongly depend on the high quality Bayesian networks
often involve hundreds of variables. The available heuristics
that can solve instances of that size, e.g. [3], do not provide
any guarantees on the quality of the solutions they find.
This significantly impacts their usefulness, since the inherent
uncertainty of the model due to the input data and the
scoring function, cannot be separated from the deficiencies
of the learning algorithm [11]. Consequently, there is a
gap between the quality and the size of the models that
depend on the exact parent set identification and that can be
efficiently learned from the data.
Responding to the above challenges, in this paper, we
propose a new distributed memory algorithm for the exact
parent sets identification problem. Our goal is to push the
limit on the scale of instances that can be solved in acceptable time limits on a modestly sized parallel cluster. To this
end, we make the following specific contributions: 1) we
propose a new strategy to constraint and reorganize dynamic
programming computations in the parent set assignment
problem such that computational grain is improved and finegrained synchronization is avoided, 2) we define a simple
mechanism that we use to change the mode of computations from BFS to DFS such that the main memory is
preserved. To validate our approach, we provide an efficient
implementation on the Apache Spark platform [12], and
demonstrate its strong scalability across different ML test
sets. We then show that on a 500-core cluster with 25 nodes,
our system can process HEPAR II test data [13] in slightly
over 20 hours. With 70 variables and small variability, this
data set is one of the most challenging benchmarks for
Bayesian networks structure learning, and it has no exact
results available to date.
The paper is organized following the common practice.
In Section 2, we provide basic definitions and formally
state the problem. In Section 3, we introduce our proposed
method, and we describe its experimental validation in
Section 4. We summarize related work in Section 5, and
conclude the paper in Section 6.
2. Preliminaries
Consider a set of n random variables X
=
{X1 , . . . , Xn }, and suppose that we are given a complete
input data table D = {D1 , . . . , Dn }, where Di is a vector
of m observations of Xi . Let s(Xi , P a(Xi )) be a scoring
function that quantifies how well Xi is explained by a set
of variables P a(Xi ) ⊆ X − {Xi } given the data D. We will
call P a(Xi ) a parent set, or simply parents, of Xi . We are
assuming that s is given. For example, it could be one of
the several available functions, such as information theoretic
MDL [14] and AIC [15] or the BD family implementing
Bayesian scoring criteria [16], [17]. In this work, we mostly
focus on the MDL scoring function, but our results can
be generalized to other scoring criteria. Moreover, we do
not consider details of how s is computed, except that it
has to access the data in D, and the cost of computations
is not negligible as it grows with the size of P a(Xi ) and
the number of observations m. The parent set assignment
problem is to find a subset P a(Xi ) ⊆ X − {Xi } such that
s(Xi , P a(Xi )) is minimized.
Let d(Xi , U ), U ⊆ X − {Xi }, be the score of selecting
optimal parent set of Xi from among variables in U , that
is d(Xi , U ) = min s(Xi , P a(Xi )). We can efficiently
P a(Xi )⊆U
express d via the following recursion:
(
s(Xi , U ),
d(Xi , U ) = min min d(X , U − {X }).
i
j
(1)
Xj ∈U
To find an optimal parent set assignment of Xi we could
solve the recursion in Eq. (1) for U = X − {Xi } while
recording the choice of parents we made in the process.
However, in the majority of practical applications, especially
in the context of Bayesian networks structure learning, it
is necessary to consider a slightly broader version of the
problem.
We will say that U ⊆ X − {Xi } is a maximal parent set
of Xi if d(Xi , U ) = s(Xi , U ). From Eq. (1) we have that
if U is a maximal parent set then no subset of U has score
better than d(Xi , U ), i.e. ∀U 0 ⊂U d(Xi , U ) < d(Xi , U 0 ).
Hence, by identifying all maximal parent sets of Xi and
memoizing their corresponding scores s, we can efficiently
answer queries about any optimal parent set of Xi . Specifically, to answer query d(Xi , U 0 ) for any U 0 it is sufficient
to check if U 0 is one of the maximal parent sets of Xi . If it
is, then all we have to do is to return the memoized score
s of that maximal parent set. Otherwise, d(Xi , U 0 ) must be
equal to the smallest s among all maximal parent sets of Xi
for which U 0 is a superset.
The above property of maximal parent sets has important
practical implications. For example, to compute the score
Q(X ) of an optimal Bayesian network over X , and thus find
the network itself, we have to solve recursion of the form
Q(U ) = min (d(Xi , U − {Xi }) + Q(U − {Xi })). Even
Xi ∈U
with the efficient algorithms such as [2], [4] this requires
large and hard to predict number of queries for optimal
parent sets, owing to the component d(Xi , U − {Xi }) in the
recursion. Because for a single variable Xi there are 2n−1
optimal parent sets, memoizing them all is impractical and
often infeasible. In contrast, the set of all maximal parent
sets is usually many orders of magnitude smaller, and hence
using it instead, in the way we explained before, is the
desired and viable alternative [2], [4], [3].
From the computational point of view, identifying maximal parent sets of Xi is the same as selecting its optimal
parent set from X −{Xi }. The only difference are extra steps
required to test and store subsets that correspond to maximal
parent sets. In practical settings, we wish to enumerate all
maximal parent sets for all variables in X , and this is the
problem we are considering in this paper.
3. Proposed Approach
Given a set of variables X , database of observations D,
and a scoring function s, our goal is to enumerate all
maximal parent sets for all Xi ∈ X . If we consider a single
variable Xi , then we can directly apply recursion in Eq. (1)
and starting from the empty set we can consider parent sets
of growing size. This process can be though of as a top-down
traversal of the dynamic programming lattice with n levels
formed by the partial order “set inclusion” on the power set
of X −{Xi } (see Figure 1a). At the level l = 0 of the lattice
we have empty set. Two nodes in the lattice, U 0 and U , are
connected only if U 0 ⊂ U and |U | = |U 0 |+1. Here we use U
to denote both a subset of X − {Xi } and the corresponding
node in the lattice. A node U represents a parent set of Xi .
When it is discovered, we compute s(Xi , U ), compare it
with scores d passed by its predecessors to obtain d(Xi , U ),
and if U is a maximal parent set we store or report a tuple
(Xi , U, s(Xi , U )).
While the above strategy is clearly guaranteed to enumerate all maximal parent sets, it is both computationally
and memory challenging. The computational complexity is
due to the Θ(2n ) invocations of s, and memory complexity is driven by how the dynamic programming lattice is
traversed. For example, one way is to assume BFS traversal induced by the precedence constraints in the lattice.
In such case, maximal parent sets are enumerated layerby-layer with a synchronization point between any two
consecutive layers. This strategy requires that both layers
space
are stored in the memory, which implies O nn
2
complexity, irrespective of which parallel BFS realization
we assume [18]. Another approach is to use some variant
of DFS. With DFS we can benefit from techniques like hypercube pipelining, similar to [19], but this strategy requires
that we store partial results and update them each time a
node is discovered before its all predecessors are processed.
As a result, the space complexity is O(2n ) and we have
s(X1,∅)
X1
∅
X2
X3
X2,X3
X2,X4
X3
X2
∅
X4
X1
X3,X4 X1,X3
X2,X3,X4
s(X4,∅)
X4
∅
X3
X4
X1,X4
X1
X3,X4 X1,X2
X1,X3,X4
X2
X1,X4
X1
∅
X4
X1
X2,X4 X1,X2
X1,X2,X4
∅
X2
X3
X2
X3
X1,X3
X2,X3
X2,X3
X2,X4
X3
X2
∅
X4
X1
X4
∅
X3
X4
X3,X4 X1,X3
X1
X2
X1,X2
X1,X4
X1,X2,X3
∅
X4
X1
X2,X4 X1,X2
X2
X3
X1,X3
X2,X3
X1,X2,X4
s(X1,{X2,X3,X4})
(a)
(b)
X={X1,X2,X3,X4} | U=∅
X={X1,X2,X3,X4} | U=∅
s(X2,{X1}), s(X3,{X1}), s(X4,{X1})
X2,X3,X4 | X1
X3,X4 | X1,X2
X2,X4 | X1,X3
X1,X3,X4 | X2
X1,X2,X4 | X3
X3 | X1,X4
X1,X4 | X2,X3
X2,X3,X4 | X1
X1,X2,X3 | X4
X1,X3 | X2,X4
X1 | X3,X4
X3,X4 | X1,X2
X2,X4 | X1,X3
X1,X3,X4 | X2
X1,X2,X4 | X3
X3 | X1,X4
X1,X4 | X2,X3
X1,X2,X3 | X4
X1,X3 | X2,X4
X1 | X3,X4
s(X3,{X1,X2}), s(X4,{X1,X2})
X3 | X1,X2,X4
X3 | X1,X2,X4
(c)
(d)
Figure 1: (a) Example of the dynamic programming lattices for X = {X1 , X2 , X3 , X4 }. Processing node U in a lattice for
variable Xi requires computing s(Xi , U ) and access to d(Xi , U 0 ) for each predecessor U 0 of U . (b) Example constrained
lattices, and (c) their corresponding “folded” representation. A node U in the compacted lattice requires that s is evaluated for
several variables that share candidate parents U . This improves efficiency of computing s, decreases memory requirements
and increases computational density. (d) Precedence constraints after eliminating fine-grain synchronization within every
layer of the lattice in (c). Nodes processed by the same task if the DFS mode is initiated at layer l = 1 are outlined. Note
that following how input variables are ordered, the nodes in the larger tasks are more likely to be pruned.
to maintain potentially irregular memory updates to detect
new maximal parent sets. Finally, while all variables in X
can be processed independently, the resulting embarrassing
parallelism is highly limited. This is because the computational cost for a single variable is exponential in n, which
effectively constraints the total number of variables we may
hope to process. For example, if we assume n = 48 then the
estimated memory requirements to process a single lattice,
with O(2n ) nodes and 16 B per node, is 4 PB with a modest
48-way parallelism.
3.1. Constraining the Search Space
To achieve a scalable strategy, we start from constraining
the search space. This is necessary since the exponential
cost of considering all optimal parent sets is prohibitive for
realistic problem instances, irrespective of how efficient is
our parallel exploration algorithm.
For every variable Xi it is reasonable to expect that
its optimal parent set will not contain all other variables.
In other words, there is a limit on the depth to which
we should be exploring the dynamic programming lattice
of Xi . To maintain exactness guarantees, we have to ensure
that the bound on the depth of exploration is no smaller
than the unknown size of the optimal parent set. Here we
provide such a bound for the information-theoretic MDL
scoring function. We note that similar bounds can be derived
for other functions, and in fact a significant work in this
direction has been done, for example in [20].
The MDL score is defined as:
s(Xi , U ) = m · H(Xi |U ) + N C(Xi , U ),
(2)
1
· log2 (m) · qi · (ri − 1)
2
(3)
where
N C(Xi , U ) =
is a network complexity term, H(Xi |U ) is the estimated
conditional entropy of Xi given
Y U , and ri > 1 is the number
of states of Xi , and qi =
rj is the number of states
j,Xj ∈U
that variables in U can assume (qi = 1 if U = ∅). The
parameters ri and qi as well as the conditional entropy are
directly assessed from D. In short, the MDL score of a pair
(Xi , U ) is the number of bits required to encode information
about Xi and its parents U if we were to use Huffmann
coding of D.
To derive the bound we exploit the following observation. When U is empty, we have the maximal conditional
entropy H(Xi |∅) = H(Xi ) and the minimal network complexity N C(Xi , ∅) = 0.5·log2 (m)·(ri −1). By increasing the
size of U we can decrease conditional entropy of Xi , which
has the theoretical limit of 0, at the expense of increasing
network complexity. This follows from the basic properties
of entropy and the definition of the network complexity
term. Once the network complexity N C(Xi , U ) is greater or
equal to s(Xi , ∅) = m · H(Xi ) + N C(Xi , ∅), irrespective of
which variables we add to U , the score s(Xi , U ) will always
increase. This is the point at which network complexity
outweighs any gains from the decreasing entropy of Xi .
Consequently, if U satisfies
Condition 1: N C(Xi , U ) ≥ s(Xi , ∅),
then any superset of U can be excluded from further consideration, since it will not admit new optimal or maximal
parent sets for Xi . The efficiency of Condition 1 depends
on the input data D. Nevertheless, it works extremely well
in practice. For example, in our experiments, reported in
Section 4, we found that for real-world data with n = 70
we never considered nodes with more than nine variables.
We can further extend our pruning strategy by using
the following observation [21]. The lowest entropy we can
achieve for Xi is H(Xi , X −{Xi }). Now consider the score
d(Xi , U ). Here we have that if
Condition 2: d(Xi , U ) ≤ m·H(Xi , X −{Xi })+N C(Xi , U )
holds, then no superset of U can improve the score d(Xi , U ).
This is because any superset of U has higher network
complexity, and hence ∀U 0 ⊃U m · H(Xi , X − {Xi }) +
N C(Xi , U ) ≤ H(Xi , X − {Xi }) + N C(Xi , U 0 ). As previously, if U satisfies the condition we can exclude it from
further considerations, since it will not admit new optimal
or maximal parent sets. The example effect of applying our
pruning conditions is shown in Figure 1b.
Although both conditions achieve the same goal of
pruning the search space, they differ in which information
they require. To test Condition 1, we use only network
complexity, which can be computed for any pair Xi and
U independently of other U 0 ⊂ U , i.e. independently of
predecessors of U in the dynamic programming lattice. On
the other hand, Condition 2 provides a tighter bound but
depends on the score d(Xi , U ), which, as we explained
earlier, requires access to the maximal parent sets of Xi .
3.2. Parallel Exploration
Because of the memory and computational complexity,
which remains challenging even when our pruning conditions are applied, we focus our parallel strategy on the
distributed memory systems, with the Apache Spark platform [12] serving as an execution vehicle.
Recall that our goal is to traverse in the top-down fashion
the dynamic programming lattices for all Xi . A node U in
a lattice corresponds to a computational task that evaluates
s(Xi , U ), tests if U is a maximal parent set, and checks if supersets of U can admit new maximal parent sets. These tests
are the source of precedence constraints between the tasks.
The main idea of our parallel approach is as follows. We onthe-fly generate and “fold” the dynamic programming lattices for different Xi into a single lattice with lower memory
requirement and denser computational load. We explore the
resulting lattice in parallel, initially in the BFS mode, and
switch to DFS when memory becomes a bottleneck. To store
and access maximal parent sets discovered in the process, we
maintain a global state, which is synchronized via reduction
between the layers. Finally, we reorder computations within
each layer to eliminate fine-grain synchronization between
the tasks, that otherwise would be necessary to effectuate
our pruning conditions. Below, we explain each element of
our approach.
3.2.1. Folding Lattices. If we consider the dynamic programming lattice for variable Xi , then until our pruning
conditions become effective we have to manage n−1
tasks
l
at the level l of the lattice. Consequently, the memory
required to represent the entire layer l is bounded by
B1 = c1 · n · n−1
, assuming cost c1 to store a task.
l
This easily becomes problematic for larger problems as soon
as l > 2. The problem persists even when pruning takes
place, since initially only some of the tasks are removed
from consideration. However, we can “fold” the dynamic
programming lattices such that the tasks sharing the same
set U across different lattices are represented by a single task
(see Figure 1c). Let the memory taken by such combined
task be c2 . The memory requirement of the new lattice is
c1
B1
=
· (n − l) reduction in
B2 = c2 · nl . This gives us
B2
c2
memory complexity. To store a task we can use a bitmap,
where i-th bit indicates whether element i is in a set. In such
case, c2 = 2 · c1 , since in the compacted lattice we require
one bitmap to represent all Xi for a task, and one bitmap
to represent the actual U (v.s. storing only U in the original
lattice). By using bitmaps we additionally reduce memory
overhead, and we can realize basic operations, like testing
set inclusion, with only few hardware instructions. The
memory reduction becomes less significant as l increases.
However, this is acceptable, since we expect that thanks
to the pruning conditions the search process will terminate
early, which we confirm via experimental results.
The main advantage of our “folding” step is significantly
increased computational density. To process a single task in
the “folded” lattice, we have to perform multiple evaluations
of s with the same parent set U . Without explaining details
of how s is computed from D, we note that by having
the same parents in the consecutive invocations of s, we
can precompute statistics about D induced by U , and reuse
them from one invocation to another. Consequently, the cost
of processing a task in the “folded” lattice is higher than
the cost of processing an individual corresponding task in
the original lattice, but it is lower than the total cost of
processing all corresponding tasks from the original lattices,
i.e. if X is a set of random variables sharing U we have
P
that T (s(X, U )) <
Xi ∈X T (s(Xi , U )), where T is the
processing cost.
By “folding” the lattices, we limit parallelism in the
first two stages of the lattice. However, this has a negligible
effect on the scalability, since even for large n the cost of
processing these layers is minimal compared to the total
processing time. Alternatively, we may decide to “fold”
the lattices only after the desired level of parallelism is
achieved. Finally, the computational cost of individual tasks
becomes non-uniform, but this is addressed by the dynamic
scheduling at the run-time.
3.2.2. Limiting Synchronization. Consider the task for
node U at the layer l, and suppose that Condition 1 or
Condition 2 holds for U . In such case, no task that corresponds to a superset of U should be generated and included
in the layer l + 1, as it will not contribute new maximal
parent sets. In other words, at given layer we should see
only those tasks whose predecessors all did not satisfy the
pruning conditions. However, to enforce this requirement
we would need either complex synchronization between all
tasks within the same layer, or a reduction operation on all
possible tasks for the next layer, which effectively would
defy the purpose of pruning.
To address this problem, we can change the way in
which tasks for the next layer are enumerated, such that
synchronization is bypassed at the small cost of considering a few unnecessary tasks in the next layer. We first
order variables in X by the decreasing number of states
they have in D, i.e. for any Xi and Xj , if i < j then
ri ≥ rj , and we maintain this ordering for every node U .
If two variables have the same number of states, we use
H(Xi , X − {Xi }) < H(Xj , X − {Xj }) as a secondary
condition. Then, when deciding whether a task should be
considered in the next layer, instead of checking if any of
its predecessors satisfied pruning condition, which would
require synchronization, we check only one selected predecessor. Specifically, let Xj ∈ U be the maximal element
in U . To enumerate descendants of U , we consider only
U 0 = U ∪ {Xk } for all k > j . Thus, node U becomes a
predecessor to n − j nodes (see Figure 1d). At the same
time, from Eq. (3) and Conditions 1 and 2, it follows that
smaller the j the higher the probability that U will satisfy
pruning conditions. To see why, observe that the network
complexity term grows as the product of the number of
states that variables in U can assume. Because variables
are ordered by the decreasing number of their states and the
increasing entropy, we have that if |U | = |U 00 | and j < j 00 ,
where Xj is the maximal element in U and Xj 00 is the
maximal element in U 00 , then N C(Xi , U ) ≥ N C(Xi , U 00 ).
Consequently, nodes that are predecessors to the largest
number of nodes in the next layer are most likely to meet the
pruning conditions. While this approach does not guarantee
that all tasks that should be pruned will not be generated,
it works very well in practice. In fact, in our experiments
we found that we remove no less than 97% of all tasks that
should be pruned. The remaining 3% constitute an extra
work of processing nodes that do not contribute maximal
parent sets. Note that these nodes once processed never
create successors and thus the extra work overhead does
not propagate.
To decide whether node U at layer l is a maximal
parent set for Xi , we require optimal parent set scores,
d(Xi , U 0 ), for all subsets U 0 ⊂ U from the layer l − 1. As
we explained earlier, instead of maintaining a complete list
of all optimal parent sets, to retrieve d(Xi , U ) we depend
only on the previously enumerated maximal parent sets. For
each variable Xi , we store a list L(Xi ) of its maximal parent
sets represented by tuples (U, s(Xi , U )), and sorted by the
score s(Xi , U ). Then to extract all optimal parent set scores
for Xi and U we require O(|L(Xi )|) scan of L(Xi ). This
is affordable, since even complete L(Xi ) is very small for
a typical input data (see Table 1 in Section 4). Each task
at layer l may contribute a new maximal parent set that
must be available to all tasks for Xi in the subsequent
layers. Consequently, we maintain all L(Xi ) as a global
state that is updated via all-to-all reduction, with list merging
as an operator, after given layer is entirely processed. This
step can be efficiently executed considering a small size of
L(Xi ).
3.2.3. Changing Exploration Mode. While our pruning
conditions significantly constrain the search space, for large
problems the number of the tasks generated in the later
stages of the execution may still exceed the available main
memory. This in turn would lead to the undesired out-ofcore execution. After processing all tasks at layer l, we can
estimate the number of tasks that layer l + 2 will have in
the worst case. If that number exceeds the total available
memory, it is reasonable to conclude that we have sufficient
parallelism, and instead of creating new tasks we can change
the mode of execution into a memory preserving DFS.
Specifically, for each node U at layer l + 1, instead of
considering all supersets of U independently, we can process
them sequentially following the DFS order (see Figure 1d).
However, in such case we cannot assume that the global list
of all maximal parent sets is consistent between different
tasks. As a result, some tasks could end up generating
incorrect maximal parent sets or could perform extra work
because without the access to the complete list of maximal
parent sets Condition 2 could unnecessarily fail. To mitigate
this situation, we flag all maximal parent sets generated
in the DFS mode that potentially could not be maximal
in the global sense, i.e. when maximal parent sets from
other tasks are taken into the account. These are maximal
parent sets U whose at least one strict subset U 0 ⊂ U
has been processed in a different task. Once all tasks are
processed, we perform reduction to obtain the final global
state for all L(Xi ). Then, we proceed with checking if the
flagged maximal parent sets remain maximal in the merged
L(Xi ). Let zf (Xi ) be the total number of maximal parent
sets flagged when running in the DFS mode. The cost of
verifying these maximal parent sets is O(zf (Xi ) · |L(xi )|).
This is because, in the worst case, for every flagged maximal
parent set U , we have to check if none of the remaining
elements in L(Xi ) is a subset of U with a better score.
However, it turns out that in the practical settings zf (Xi )
is a very small number, and in fact frequently we have that
zf (Xi ) = 0. To understand why, consider the following. The
memory requirements due to BFS grow exponentially with
the depth of the dynamic programming lattice. At the same
time, because the network complexity term, N C , grows
exponentially as well, the probability of enumerating new
maximal parent sets decreases as we progress to the higher
layers of the lattice. In our experiments, for all tested data
sets we did not enumerate new maximal parent sets beyond
layer l = 6. At the same time, if the available main memory
is limited, and we are forced to switch to the DFS mode
early, then we can expect that the majority of the maximal
parent sets tested by a single task will not be depending on
the maximal parent sets discovered in other tasks. This is
a direct consequence of the precedence constraints within
the lattice.
When switching to the DFS mode, we can expect an
increased computational imbalance between the tasks. However, the largest tasks which could be the source of the most
significant imbalance are the ones which are the most likely
to be pruned. At the same time, the number of the DFS tasks
will remain sufficient to provide room for load balancing at
the run-time, which we confirm by experiments.
3.3. Apache Spark Implementation
We implemented our parallel approach using the Apache
Spark platform. The reason we use Spark is purely pragmatic: the platform supports locality-aware dynamic task
scheduling, which we directly benefit from, since our computational tasks can be heterogeneous owing to the lattice
“folding” and the potential use of the DFS mode. Additionally, Spark API makes expressing iterative BSP-style
programs extremely productive. While it is clear that using
one of the traditional HPC models, e.g. MPI or UPC, we
could probably achieve faster implementation, we believe
that the scalability would remain comparable.
The high level exploration components of our method
are implemented in Python, and the computationally intensive parts, specifically evaluations of function s, are
offloaded to the efficient, SIMD-parallel C++ kernel derived
from our SABNA package [4], [22]. Apache Spark is usually
regarded as a platform for the data intensive computing. In
our case, the input data is typically very small (i.e. at the order of MB), however, it quickly generates massive new data
representing individual tasks of the dynamic programming
lattice. Below we provide details of the implementation
assuming that reader is familiar with the basics of the
Apache Spark interface [23].
We follow the standard BSP model realized via iterative transformations on a sequence of Spark Resilient
Distributed Datasets (RDDs), where RDDi represents
layer i of the compacted dynamic programming lattice.
To represent a node in the lattice, RDD stores a tuple (X, U ), where both X and U are expressed via
bitmaps, and X keeps variables that share U . To obtain RDDi , we initialize and parallelize RDD0 on Spark
driver, since this is very inexpensive operation. Then, we
iteratively apply the following transformations: RDDi =
RDDi−1 .repartition(p).mapP artitions(M ), where p is a
small multiple, usually four (as suggested in several Apache
Spark best practices), of the total number of cores that Spark
executors can use, and M is the mapping function that:
1) evaluates function s for all variables in X , and identifies
potential maximal parent sets, 2) checks the conditions to
constraint the search space, and 3) accordingly yields nodes
for the next layer to explore. The repartitioning transformation is to ensure good load balancing between executors
since the number of tasks grows from one RDD to the next.
Here we depend on the default Spark scheduler. We use
mapP artitions, instead of a more natural map, to enable
indexing of the data D when map M is initialized. By indexing D we significantly accelerate computations of s, and
by doing so only once per partition we avoid unnecessary
overheads. At the end of every iteration we materialize RDD
by invoking Spark’s count action. Based on the resulting
size of RDD, we assess the memory requirement for the
subsequent iterations, and decide whether we should be
switching to the DFS mode. Finally, at any point of the
execution we make sure that the last two RDDs are cached
and remain in the main memory to avoid expensive RDD
recomputing or restoring from the secondary storage.
The mapping function M makes use of the information
about maximal parent sets from previous iterations, i.e.
L(Xi ) for all Xi . To maintain this global state we use a
combination of Spark accumulator and broadcast variables,
since the memory cost of representing maximal parent sets
is very small. In a given iteration, newly discovered maximal
parent sets are added by each executor to a customized
Spark accumulator to form an update to the global list of
all maximal parent sets. As this could lead to potential
duplicate entries in L(Xi ) when a task fails or speculative
execution is enabled, we make sure that only unique entries
are considered. After the count action at the end of the
iteration is performed, the accumulator is reduced an the
global list managed by the Spark driver is updated and
broadcast back to the executors. Together with the count and
repartition step, these operations represent communication
and synchronization stages in the BSP model.
In the DFS mode, instead of generating RDD for the
next layer, which would exceed the available main memory,
we apply another transformation to the current RDD, where
we explore each partition as described in Section 3.2.3. As
we explained earlier, this increases the computational cost of
every task and makes tasks more heterogeneous. However, at
this stage the number of RDD partitions and the distribution
of their computational load is such that the Spark run-time
can easily maintain load balance.
4. Experimental Results
To understand performance characteristics of our approach, we performed a set of experiments on a standalone
Apache Spark cluster with 25 nodes and GbE interconnect.
TABLE 1: Data sets used in experiments.
Name
AL-4K
AL-10K
HF-10K
USCD
HEPAR II
n
37
37
56
56
70
m
4,000
10,000
10,000
10,000
4,000
ri
min/max
z
2/4
2/4
2/11
2/18
2/4
2,654
5,636
3,941
44,804
1,714
|L(Xi )|
min/max
1/281
1/648
4/353
3/3857
1/381
TABLE 2: Execution time in minutes.
Compute Nodes
12
16
Name
2
4
8
AL-4K
AL-10K
HF-10K
USCD
27.1
241.4
425.4
995.7
14.3
123.4
214
496.5
7
61
107.5
249.2
4.8
41.5
71.8
167.6
4.8
31.3
54.2
127.1
20
24
3.1
25.11
43.4
101.8
2.9
20.9
36.6
85.4
TABLE 3: Effect of reorganizing the search space.
4.1. Scalability Tests
In the first set of experiments, we analyzed scalability of
the platform depending on the number of input variables n
and the number of observations m. We executed our Spark
software on the varying number of nodes and we recorded
wall time, as well as: lmax – the deepest processed layer
in the dynamic programming lattice, lz – the last layer at
which we found new maximal parent sets, and the amount
of extra work we had to perform due to removed synchronization (Section 3.2.2). The results of this experiment are
summarized in Tables 2-3 and Figure 2. Here we report only
relative speedup computed with respect to the time obtained
on two nodes, since, except of AL-4K, we were not able to
process the test data sets using sequential software.
We start the analysis by first looking at the execution
time and the speedup of our method. From Table 2 and
Figure 2 we can see that, with the exception of AL-4K, the
software achieves very good scalability on up to 24 nodes
lmax
Name
AL-4K
AL-10K
HF-10K
USCD
9
10
7
8
lz
Nodes processed
4
5
4
6
107
4.6 ×
1.6 × 108
3.1 × 107
2.1 × 108
Extra work
1.68%
1.72%
3.2%
1.23%
(480 cores). In all test cases, the required main memory
never exceeds 84 GB, which enables us to run completely
in the BFS mode. The slightly weaker scalability for AL4K can be attributed to the overall size of the problem.
With small n and relatively small number of observations
the problem can be solved in a few minutes on 12 nodes.
Beyond that point, the overhead of synchronization between
layers becomes significant compared to the optimized compute time on the collapsed dynamic programming lattice. As
the number of observations for this data set increases (data
set AL-10K), computational time increases and expectedly
scalability improves.
Because of the relatively small size, we were able to
process AL-4K using a sequential code in 2,435 minutes.
The sequential code is written entirely in C++, is optimized
for memory usage and provides the same lattice constraining
techniques as the parallel version. It also uses the same
computational kernel to compute s. While this result suggests outstanding super-linear performance of our parallel
code, we should keep in mind that the comparison is not
completely fair, since the sequential version has significant
overheads due to memory management (to avoid enumerating unnecessary tasks). Nevertheless, the result shows that
even “small” problems can take more than a day to process
12
Relative Speedup
Each node in the cluster is equipped with 20-core dualsocket Intel Xeon E5v3 2.3 GHz processor, 64 GB of RAM
and a standard SATA hard drive. The shared file system
is run under GPFS, however, this is of minor importance
considering that the input data is very small, even for the
largest considered problems, and it is accessed only once at
the very beginning of the computations. In all tests, Spark
driver runs with the default parameters, and since it is a
very light-weight process, it is collocated with one of the
executors. We allocate one Spark executor per node using
the default configuration for the number of cores, i.e. each
executor uses all available cores in a node. All executors
are configured to use 58GB out of the available 64GB, with
the remaining memory available to the operating system
and Python interpreter. We note that we tested different
configurations of executor-to-core ratios, across different
data sets, without noticeable difference in performance.
We used several popular benchmark data sets from the
UCI Machine Learning Repository [24], including Alarm
(AL), Hail Finder (HF), the US Census Data (UCSD) and
HEPAR II. These are commonly considered too challenging to be solved exactly using sequential techniques, and
are among the most demanding tests for the parent set
assignment. The properties of all data sets are provided in
Table 1, including: ri – the number of states (arity) that
the variables in the set can assume, z – the total number
of generated maximal parent sets, and the properties of the
output collection of the maximal parent sets L(Xi ).
10
8
Linear
AL-4K
AL-10K
HF-10K
USCD
6
4
2
4
8
12
16
20
24
Compute Nodes
Figure 2: Relative speedup computed with respect to the
execution time on two nodes.
sequentially, and this time can be easily reduced to minutes
by using a cluster with a few nodes.
Next we consider the effectiveness of our approach in
terms of removing synchronization and constraining the
search space. Table 3 shows that in the worst case we
have to perform only 3.2% of extra work compared to the
completely synchronized version in which no unnecessary
tasks are generated. At the same time, the total number
of processed nodes is a small fraction of what we would
have to process without constraining the search space. For
example, for the USCD benchmark the total number of tasks
up to layer lmax = 8 is 1,689,096,333 when no pruning
is applied, and it is reduced to approximately 12% of that
when the pruning is enabled. Even then however, the total
number of tasks to process is of the order of 108 , which
demonstrates complexity of the problem and the need for
parallel approach. The same pattern holds true for other
tested data sets.
The last layer at which we enumerate new maximal parent sets, lz , is always much smaller than lmax . This suggests
that there is a room to tighten the pruning conditions. At
the same time, it confirms that switching to the DFS at
the higher levels of the dynamic programming lattice will
not trigger any significant work due to how we manage the
global state with all maximal parent sets. Finally, by looking
at the results for AL-4 and AL-10 data sets, we can see
that both lmax and lz are increasing when the number of
observations increases. This is because with the growing m
the network complexity term increases logarithmically for
any variable Xi , but s(Xi , ∅) grows linearly. Consequently,
the effectiveness of the pruning conditions decreases. Nevertheless, the overall performance of the method remains
reasonable.
4.2. HEPAR II Test
In our second experiment, we focused on the HEPAR II
test data. This benchmark comes from one of the early clinical decision support systems for multiple-disorder diagnosis
of liver that involved a complex Bayesian network [13]. As
we already mentioned, the parent set assignment problem
plays a critical role in the exact Bayesian networks learning,
and hence directly translates into our ability to build high
quality models for critical applications. This makes the
benchmark interesting from the practical point of view. The
benchmark is also challenging as it contains 70 variables,
and all variables assume only few states, making it hard to
identify variables that should be pruned.
To process HEPAR II we used all 25 nodes of our
cluster. The experiment took 20 hours and 17 minutes to
complete, with lmax = 8 and lz = 4. To the best of our
knowledge, this is the first time exact results for HEPAR II
are reported. The peak memory consumption was 327 GB,
and the execution involved the total of 10,770,519,474 tasks.
Because the total memory available in our cluster is 1.6 TB,
we again were able to process this benchmark completely
in the BFS mode. However, to see how turning into the
DFS mode affects the performance, we limited the available
memory to 4 GB per node or 100 GB total memory. In
this case, at layer l = 7 we had to switch to the DFS
mode to process the remaining 9,427,586,763 tasks. This
had the minor impact on the performance, and we were
able to complete the entire execution in 20 hours and 28
minutes. Here we should keep in mind that because lz = 4
there were no new maximal parent sets discovered when
running in the DFS mode. However, we believe that even
with new parent sets discovered the performance would not
be drastically changed.
5. Related Work
Because of its importance, the parent assignment problem has been considered as a standalone question [1], [3]
and in the relation to the structure learning of Bayesian
networks [2], [4]. In [1], Koivisto provides several hardness
results that suggest that the parent assignment for a single
variable most likely has no polynomial-time solution. This
motivates our parallel approach as there is a practical need
to push the size of the problems that can be solved exactly
in realistic time limits. In [2], [4], multiple authors discuss
the application of maximal parent sets in exact Bayesian
networks structure learning. However, in each case maximal
parent sets are assumed to be given and no details of how
that is achieved are provided. In this paper, we provide the
actual scalable algorithm for maximal parent sets enumeration, which in fact can be combined with any Bayesian
network structure learning strategy. There is a significant
body of work on solving maximal parent sets enumeration while discovering Bayesian network structure [25],
[26], [27], including parallel algorithms [19], [28]. However, when both problems are coupled many optimizations
specific to the parent sets enumeration become infeasible.
As a result, these combined approaches do not scale and
are limited to the instances with 30 to 40 variables, even
when using thousands of cores and provably optimal MPIbased realizations [19], [28]. Finally, recently Scanagatta et
al. [3] proposed a greedy heuristic that depends on a fast
approximation of the actual scoring function to constraint
the number of explored parent sets. While this approach
can be used to solve problems larger than what we report,
it does not provide any quality guarantees. In contrast, our
method is guaranteed to provide the exact solution.
6. Conclusion
The exact parent set identification is a challenging problem with important applications in the exact structure learning of Bayesian networks. In this paper, we proposed a new
scalable distributed memory approach to the problem, and
we used it to efficiently process HEPAR II data set. This
experiment clearly demonstrated that our method can handle
even the most challenging data sets and using only limited
hardware resources. This in turn opens new possibilities for
exact learning of large Bayesian networks, as with some
effort our method can be combined with the already existing
solvers, e.g. [4]. Our approach is scalable and we believe can
be generalized to other popular scoring functions including
AIC and BDeu. Since the efficiency of constraining the
search space for these functions is currently unclear, the
ability of our solution to adopt to heavy workloads provides
a significant advantage.
Acknowledgments
Authors wish to acknowledge hardware and technical
support provided by the Center for Computational Research
at the University at Buffalo.
References
[1]
M. Koivisto, “Parent assignment is hard for the MDL, AIC, and
NML costs,” in International Conference on Computational Learning
Theory, 2006, pp. 289–303.
[2]
C. Yuan, B. Malone, and X. Wu, “Learning optimal Bayesian networks using A* search,” in International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2011, pp. 2186–2191.
[3]
M. Scanagatta, C. de Campos, G. Corani, and M. Zaffalon, “Learning
Bayesian networks with thousands of variables,” in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2015, pp. 1864–1872.
[4]
[5]
[6]
S. Karan and J. Zola, “Exact structure learning of Bayesian networks
by optimal path extension,” in IEEE International Conference on Big
Data, 2016, pp. 48–55.
I. Tsamardinos, C. Aliferis, A. Statnikov, and E. Statnikov, “Algorithms for large scale Markov blanket discovery.” in FLAIRS Conference, vol. 2, 2003, pp. 376–380.
G. Kong, D.-L. Xu, and J.-B. Yang, “Clinical Decision Support
Systems: A review on knowledge representation and inference under
uncertainties,” International Journal of Computational Intelligence
Systems, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 159–167, 2008.
[7]
N. Fenton and M. Neil, “Comparing risks of alternative medical diagnosis using Bayesian arguments,” Journal of Biomedical Informatics,
vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 485–495, 2010.
[8]
L. Mukhanov, “Using Bayesian belief networks for credit card fraud
detection,” in International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and
Applications, 2008, pp. 221–225.
[9]
N. Friedman, M. Linial, I. Nachman, and D. Pe’er, “Using Bayesian
networks to analyze expression data,” Journal of Computational
Biology, vol. 7, no. 3-4, pp. 601–620, 2000.
[10] X. Fan and Y. Changhe, “An improved lower bound for Bayesian
Network structure learning,” in Association for the Advancement of
Artificial Intelligence, 2015.
[11] D. Koller and N. Friedman, Probabilistic Graphical Models: Principles and Techniques. MIT Press, 2009.
[12] M. Zaharia, M. Franklin, A. Ghodsi, J. Gonzalez, S. Shenker, I. Stoica, R. Xin, P. Wendell, T. Das, M. Armbrust, A. Dave, X. Meng,
J. Rosen, and S. Venkataraman, “Apache Spark: a unified engine for
big data processing,” Communication of the ACM, vol. 59, no. 11,
pp. 56–65, 2016.
[13] A. Onisko, M. Druzdezel, and H. Wasyluk, Extension of the HEPAR
II Model to Multiple-Disorder Diagnosis, 2000.
[14] G. Schwarz, “Estimating the dimension of a model,” The Annals of
Statistics, vol. 6, pp. 461–464, 1978.
[15] H. Akaike, “Information theory and an extension of the maximum
likelihood principle,” in Second International Symposium on Information Theory, 1973, pp. 267–281.
[16] G. Cooper and E. Herskovits, “A Bayesian method for the induction
of probabilistic networks from data,” Machine Learning, vol. 9, pp.
309–347, 1992.
[17] D. Heckerman, “A tutorial on learning with Bayesian networks,”
1995. [Online]. Available: http://tinyurl.com/j939ua3
[18] C. Leiserson and T. Schardl, “A work-efficient parallel breadthfirst search algorithm (or how to cope with the nondeterminism of
reducers),” in ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and
Architectures, 2010, pp. 303–314.
[19] O. Nikolova, J. Zola, and S. Aluru, “Parallel globally optimal structure
learning of Bayesian networks,” Journal of Parallel and Distributed
Computing, vol. 73, pp. 1039–1048, 2013.
[20] C. de Campos and Q. Ji, “Efficient structure learning of Bayesian
networks using constraints,” Journal of Machine Learning Research,
pp. 663–689, 2011.
[21] J. Tian, “A branch-and-bound algorithm for MDL learning Bayesian
networks,” in Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence,
2000, pp. 580–588.
[22] “SABNA – Scalable Accelerated Bayesian Network Analytics,” https:
//gitlab.com/SCoRe-Group/SABNA.
[23] “Spark programming guide,”
https://spark.apache.org/docs/latest/programming-guide.html.
[24] “UC Irvine Machine Learning Repository,”
https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/.
[25] S. Ott, S. Imoto, and S. Miyano, “Finding optimal models for small
gene networks,” in Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, 2004, pp.
557–567.
[26] M. Koivisto and K. Sood, “Exact Bayesian structure discovery in
Bayesian networks,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 5,
pp. 549–573, 2004.
[27] A. Singh and A. Moore, “Finding optimal Bayesian networks by
dynamic programming,” Carnegie Mellon University, Tech. Rep.,
2005.
[28] Y. Tamada, S. Imoto, and S. Miyano, “Parallel algorithm for learning
optimal Bayesian network structure,” Journal of Machine Learning
Research, vol. 12, pp. 2437–2459, 2011.
| 2cs.AI
|
THE ARITHMETICAL RANK OF THE EDGE IDEALS
OF GRAPHS WITH WHISKERS
arXiv:1307.1652v1 [math.AC] 5 Jul 2013
ANTONIO MACCHIA
Abstract. We consider the edge ideals of large classes of graphs with whiskers and for these ideals we prove that
the arithmetical rank is equal to the big height. Then we extend these results to other classes of squarefree monomial
ideals, generated in any degree, proving that the same equality holds.
Mathematics Subject Classification (2010): 13A15, 13F55, 14M10, 05C05, 05C38.
Keywords: Set-theoretic complete intersection ideals, arithmetical rank, edge ideals, whiskers, facet ideals.
1. Introduction
Given a Noetherian commutative ring with identity R, the arithmetical rank (ara) of a proper ideal I of R is
defined as the smallest integer s for which there exist s elements a1 , . . . , as of R such that the ideal (a1 , . . . , as )
has the same radical as I. In this case we will say that a1 , . . . , as generate I up to radical. In general ht I ≤ ara I.
If equality holds, I is called a set-theoretic complete intersection. As a consequence of the Auslander-Buchsbaum
formula, whenever an ideal of R = k[x1 , . . . , xn ] generated by squarefree monomials is a set-theoretic complete
intersection, it is a Cohen-Macaulay ideal. The converse is not always true.
We consider the case where R is a polynomial ring over a field K and I is the so-called edge ideal of a graph whose
vertices are the indeterminates. Its set of generators is formed by the products of the pairs of indeterminates that
form the edges of the graph. Thus I is generated by squarefree monomials of degree 2, and is therefore a
radical ideal. Large classes of graphs whose edge ideals are Cohen-Macaulay were described by Villarreal [16].
The arithmetical rank of edge ideals has recently been studied by several authors (see e.g. Kummini [12]) and
explicitly determined for some special types of graphs.
According to a well-known result by Lyubeznik [13], if I is a squarefree monomial ideal, the projective dimension
of the quotient ring R/I, denoted pdR R/I, provides a lower bound for the arithmetical rank of I. We define
the big height of I, denoted bight I, as the maximum height of the minimal prime ideals of I. In general, we
have ht I ≤ bight I ≤ pdR R/I ≤ ara I. If I is not unmixed, then I is not a set-theoretic complete intersection,
but it could still be true that bight I = pdR R/I = ara I. This equality has been established for the edge
ideals of acyclic graphs (the so-called forests) by Kimura and Terai [11] (extending a result by Barile [1]). A
weaker condition is the equality between the arithmetical rank and the projective dimension. This is the case
for lexsegment edge ideals (see Ene, Olteanu, Terai [6]), for the graphs formed by one or two cycles connected
through a path (cyclic and bicyclic graphs, see Barile, Kiani, Mohammadi and Yassemi [2]) and for the graphs
consisting of paths and cycles with a common vertex (see Kiani and Mohammadi [9]). In all these cases, the
arithmetical rank is independent of the field K.
As a consequence of what we said above, the classes of Cohen-Macaulay monomial ideals are candidate to be
set-theoretic complete intersections. We consider the family of whisker graphs, obtained by adding a whisker to
each vertex of a given graph, i.e., by attaching a terminal edge to all its vertices. More in general, we can define
the fully clique-whiskered graphs in the following way: given a graph G, a subset C of the vertex set V (G) is a
1
2
clique if it induces a complete subgraph of G. If we partition V (G) in cliques W1 , . . . , Wt and add a new vertex
wi for every clique and the edges vwi for every v ∈ Wi , then we call the resulting graph a fully clique-whiskered
graph. Cook and Nagel [4] proved that the edge ideals of the fully clique-whiskered graphs are Cohen-Macaulay.
In Section 3 we prove that the big height and the arithmetical rank are equal for a larger class of graphs with
whiskers and, as a consequence, we will deduce that the edge ideals of the fully clique-whiskered graphs are
set-theoretic complete intersections.
The notion of whisker graph can be generalized in another direction. First we can consider a simplicial complex
∆ on the vertex set formed by the indeterminates, instead of a graph, and define the facet ideal as the ideal
generated by the squarefree monomials corresponding to the facets of ∆. Then we can add a simplex to each
vertex of ∆ and suppose that these simplices are pairwise disjoint. Faridi proved in [8] that the facet ideals
obtained in this way are Cohen-Macaulay. In Section 4 we strengthen this result by showing that they are also
set-theoretic complete intersections. Finally, we will add an arbitrary number of simplices to each vertex of
∆ and prove that the big height of the facet ideal of the simplicial complex obtained in this way equals the
arithmetical rank. All the results presented in this paper are independent of the field K.
2. Preliminaries
A useful technique that provides an upper bound for the arithmetical rank of ideals is the following result due
to Schmitt and Vogel.
Lemma 2.1. ([15], p. 249) Let R be a commutative ring with identity and P be a finite subset of elements of R. Let
P0 , . . . , Pr be subsets of P such that
S
(i) ri=0 Pi = P ;
(ii) P0 has exactly one element;
(iii) if p and p′ are different elements of Pi (0 < i < r), there is an integer i′ , with 0 ≤ i′ < i, and an element in
Pi′ which divides pp′ .
P
We set qi = p∈Pi pe(p) , where e(p) ≥ 1 are arbitrary integers. We will write (P ) for the ideal of R generated by
the elements of P . Then
p
p
(P ) = (q0 , . . . , qr ).
Another method to estimate the arithmetical rank of monomial ideals involves the Lyubeznik resolutions and
was developed by Kimura in [10].
Let R = k[x1 , . . . , xn ] and I a monomial ideal of R with minimal set of generators {u1 , . . . , uµ }, where
µ = µ(I) is the minimum number of generators of I. The Taylor resolution of I is
dµ
where T0 = Re∅ , Ts =
dµ−1
d
1
T• : 0 → Tµ −→ Tµ−1 −→ · · · −→
T0 → R/I → 0,
M
Rei1 ···is and ei1 ···is are free basis elements of Ts , with
1≤i1 <···<is ≤µ
deg ei1 ···is = deg lcm(ui1 , . . . , uis ).
The differentials are defined by
s
X
(−1)j−1
ds (ei1 ···is ) =
j=1
lcm(ui1 , . . . , uis )
ei1 ···ibj ···is .
lcm(ui1 , . . . , uc
ij , . . . , uis )
A Lyubeznik resolution is a graded free resolution of R/I which is a subcomplex of the Taylor resolution of I.
3
Definition 2.2. ([14]) For every 1 ≤ i1 < · · · < is ≤ µ, the symbol ei1 ···is is called L-admissible if uq does
not divide lcm(uit , uit+1 , . . . , uis ) for all 1 ≤ t < s and for all 1 ≤ q < it . The Lyubeznik resolution of I is the
subcomplex of the Taylor resolution of I generated by all L-admissible symbols.
In the following we will identify the symbol ei1 ···is with the sequence of monomials ui1 , . . . , uis .
A Lyubeznik resolution of I depends on the order of the generators u1 , u2 , . . . , uµ .
Definition 2.3. The L-length λ of I is the minimum length of the Lyubeznik resolutions of I.
While the Taylor resolution of I is far from being a minimal graded free resolution of I, a Lyubeznik resolution
of I often is minimal.
Theorem 2.4. ([10], Theorem 1) Let I a monomial ideal of R = k[x1 , . . . , xn ], then
ara I ≤ λ.
In the following we will consider squarefree monomial ideals arising from graphs, the so-called edge ideals.
Definition 2.5. Let G be a graph with vertex set V (G) = {x1 , . . . , xn }, with n ∈ N, n ≥ 1, and whose edge
set is E(G). Suppose that x1 , . . . , xn are indeterminates over the field K. The edge ideal of G in the polynomial
ring R = K [x1 , . . . , xn ] is the squarefree monomial ideal
I(G) = xi xj {xi , xj } ∈ E(G) .
For the sake of simplicity, we will use the same notation xi xj for the monomial and for the corresponding edge.
Let G be a graph and x a vertex of G. Adding a whisker to the vertex x of G means adding a new vertex y and
the edge connecting x and y.
Definition 2.6. A subset C of V (G) is a clique if it induces a complete subgraph of G. A clique vertex-partition
of G is a set π = {W1 , . . . , Wt } of disjoint (possibly empty) cliques of G whose union is V (G).
Notice that G may admit many different clique vertex-partitions, and every graph has at least one clique
vertex-partition, namely the trivial partition τ = {{x1 }, . . . , {xn }}.
Definition 2.7. Given a clique W of G, a clique-whiskering of W is given by adding a new vertex w and connecting w to every vertex in W . Let π = {W1 , . . . , Wt } be a clique vertex-partition of G. Consider the cliquewhiskering of every clique of π obtained by adding the vertex wi to Wi (where wi 6= wj if i 6= j). We call the
graph Gπ obtained in this way fully clique-whiskered. This graph has vertex set V (G) ∪ {w1 , . . . , wt } and edge
set E(G) ∪ {vwi | v ∈ Wi }.
If τ is the trivial partition, we call the Gτ the whisker graph on G. Note that empty cliques produce isolated
vertices.
Example 2.8. Let G be the three-cycle C3 on the vertex set {x1 , x2 , x3 }. There are three distinct clique vertexpartitions of G (without empty cliques): the trivial partition τ = {{x1 }, {x2 }, {x3 }}, π = {{x1 , x2 }, {x3 }} and
ρ = {{x1 , x2 , x3 }}. These partitions produce the following fully clique-whiskered graphs:
4
y3
b
y2
b
τ
Gρ
π
G
G
b
x3
x3
b
x3
b
b
x1
y1
b
b
b
y1
x2
x1
b
b
b
x2
x1
b
b
x2
y2
b
y1
Figure 1. Clique-whiskerings of the three-cycle
Cook and Nagel [4] have shown the following result:
Theorem 2.9. ([4], Corollary 3.5) Let π be a clique vertex-partition of a graph G and let Gπ be the fully cliquewhiskering graph of G on π. Then the ideal I(Gπ ) is Cohen-Macaulay.
Remark 2.10. Suppose that |V (G)| = n. Then ht I(Gπ ) = n because I(Gπ ) is pure (see Bruns-Herzog [3], Cor.
5.1.5) and the ideal generated by the vertices of G is a minimal prime ideal of I(Gπ ).
Theorem 2.9 had previously been proven by Dochtermann and Engström [5] for whisker graphs, which is also a
special case of [8], Theorem 8.2.
In the same way as squarefree monomial ideals generated in degree two can be attached to graphs, squarefree
monomial ideals with generators of any degree can, more in general, be attached to simplicial complexes. This
gives rise to the notion of facet ideal, which has been extensively studied by Faridi in [7] and [8].
Definition 2.11. Let ∆ be a simplicial complex with vertex set V (∆) and facets F1 , . . . , Fq . A vertex cover for
∆ is a subset A of V (∆), with the property that for every facet Fi there is a vertex v ∈ A such that v ∈ Fi . A
minimal vertex cover of ∆ is a subset A of V (∆) such that A is a vertex cover and no proper subset of A is a
vertex cover for ∆.
Definition 2.12. Let ∆ be a simplicial complex on the vertex set V (∆) = {x1 , . . . , xn }. The facet ideal of ∆
is the ideal I(∆) in k[x1 , . . . , xn ] generated by all squarefree monomials xi1 · · · xis , such that {xi1 , . . . , xis } is a
facet of ∆.
Proposition 2.13. ([7], Proposition 1) Let ∆ be a simplicial complex over n vertices. Consider the facet ideal
I(∆) in the polynomial ring R = k[x1 , . . . , xn ]. Then an ideal P = (xi1 , . . . , xis ) of R is a minimal prime of I(∆)
if and only if {xi1 , . . . , xis } is a minimal vertex cover for ∆.
Let us consider a simplicial complex ∆ on the vertex set V (∆) = {x1 , . . . , xn }. For every vertex xi , we add a
facet Fi of dimension ≥ 1 such that
• Fi ∩ V (∆) = {xi }, for every i = 1, . . . , n,
• Fi ∩ Fj = ∅ if i 6= j, for every i, j = 1, . . . , n.
We will call ∆′ the simplicial complex obtained in this way.
Theorem 2.14. ([8], Theorem 8.2) With respect to the above notations, the facet ideal I(∆′ ) is Cohen-Macaulay.
5
Remark 2.15. We have that ht I(∆′ ) = n because I(∆′ ) is pure (see Bruns, Herzog [3], Cor. 5.1.5) and, in view
of Proposition 2.13, the ideal generated by the vertices of ∆ is a minimal prime ideal of I(∆′ ).
3. The arithmetical rank of the edge ideals of graphs with whiskers
In this section we prove the equality between the arithmetical rank and the (big) height for the edge ideals of
some classes of graphs obtained by adding one or more whiskers to every vertex of a given graph. We provide
explicit formulas and examine the special case where the graph is a cycle.
Proposition 3.1. Let G be a graph on the vertex set V (G) = {x1 , . . . , xn }. Consider a partition {W1 , . . . , Wt } of
V (G). For all i = 1, . . . , t, and for every xj ∈ Wi add a new vertex yi and the whisker xj yi . Let G′ be the graph
obtained in this way. Then
bight I(G′ ) = ara I(G′ ) = n.
In particular, every fully clique-whiskered graph is a set-theoretic complete intersection.
Proof. Suppose that W1 = {x1 , . . . , xm1 }, W2 = {xm1 +1 , . . . , xm2 }, . . . , Wt = {xmt−1 +1 , . . . , xmt = xn }. First
we show that bight I(G′ ) ≥ n. The set A = {x1 , . . . , xn } is a minimal vertex cover since one of the vertices of
each edge of G′ belongs to A. The vertex cover A is minimal because removing a vertex xj ∈ Wi , for some i, j,
would leave the whisker xj yi uncovered. Hence bight I(G′ ) ≥ n.
Next, we prove that ara I(G′ ) ≤ n. Let us consider the following ordering of the quadratic monomials:
x1 x2 x1 x3
..
.
···
···
x1 xn
..
.
x1 y 1
..
.
xm1 xm1 +1
xm1 +1 xm1 +2
..
.
···
···
xm1 xn
xm1 +1 xn
..
.
xm1 y1
xm1 +1 y2
..
.
xmt−1 +1 xmt−1 +2 · · ·
xmt−1 +1 xn xmt−1 +1 yt
..
..
.
.
xn y t
and arrange the generators of I(G′ ) according to the induced ordering. Let u be an admissible symbol for I(G′ ).
We want to show, by induction on n, that u has length at most n. The claim is true for n = 2, because the symbol
consisting of x1 x2 , x1 y1 , x2 yi is not admissible if i = 1 or i = 2. Let n > 2 and suppose that there are exactly
r monomials in u containing the variable x1 (these are monomials appearing in the first row of the above table),
and precisely
x 1 x i1 , x 1 x i2 , . . . , x 1 x ir ,
or
x1 xi1 , x1 xi2 , . . . , x1 xir−1 , x1 y1 .
In both cases, every other monomial in u cannot contain any of the variables xi1 , xi2 , . . . , xir−1 , because x1 xij
divides x1 xir xij and x1 y1 xij for all j = 1, . . . , r − 1. Thus, the remaining monomials in u form an admissible
symbol for a graph of the same type of G′ on a vertex set W ⊂ {x2 , . . . , xn } r {xi1 , . . . , xir−1 } ∪ {y1 , . . . , yt }.
By induction, this symbol has length at most n−1−(r−1) = n−r. Therefore u has length at most r+n−r = n.
It follows, from Theorem 2.4, that ara I(G′ ) ≤ n. Hence bight I(G′ ) = ara I(G′ ) = n.
The second part of the statement follows from Remark 2.10.
6
If G is the whisker graph on a cycle graph Cn , using Lemma 2.1 we can find n polynomials that generate
I(G) up to radical and whose expressions are simpler than those obtained using the technique due to Kimura
(compare what follows with the proof of Theorem 1 in [10]).
Given a cycle Cn on the vertex set V (Cn ) = {x1 , . . . , xn }, we consider the n-sunlet graph Sn on Cn , obtained
by adding to each vertex xi of Cn a whisker, whose terminal vertex is yi , for all i = 1, . . . , n.
Example 3.2. For each n ∈ N, n ≥ 3, the edge ideal of the n-sunlet graph Sn is a set-theoretic complete
intersection, namely
ara I(Sn ) = ht I(Sn ) = |V (Cn )| = n.
We distinguish the following cases.
If n = 3, consider the following sums of monomials
q 0 = x1 x2
q 1 = x1 x3 + x2 x3
q 2 = x1 y 1 + x2 y 2 + x3 y 3 .
If n = 4, set
q 0 = x1 x2
q 1 = x1 x4 + x2 x3
q 2 = x1 y 1 + x2 y 2 + x3 x4
q 3 = x3 y 3 + x4 y 4 .
Finally, for n = 5, set
q 0 = x1 x2
q 1 = x1 x5 + x2 x3
q 2 = x1 y 1 + x4 x5
q 3 = x2 y 2 + x3 x4 + x3 y 3 x5 y 5
q 4 = x3 y 3 + x4 y 4 + x5 y 5 .
Now suppose that n ≥ 6. In this case set
q 0 = x1 x2
q 1 = x1 xn + x2 x3
q 2 = x2 y 2 + x3 x4
..
.
qn−4 = xn−4 yn−4 + xn−3 xn−2
qn−3 = x1 y1 + xn−1 xn
qn−2 = xn−3 yn−3 + xn−2 xn−1 + xn−2 yn−2 xn yn
qn−1 = xn−2 yn−2 + xn−1 yn−1 + xn yn .
7
p
Then, in any case, we have I(Sn ) = (q0 , . . . , qn−1 ) by Lemma 2.1. We show that its assumptions are fulfilled
by the sets P0 , . . . , Pn−1 , where, for all i = 0, . . . , n − 1, Pi is the set of monomials appearing in qi . It is
straightforward to verify that conditions (i) and (ii) are satisfied. Evidently condition (iii) is true if n ∈ {3, 4, 5}.
We prove it for n ≥ 6. The product of the monomials in P1 is x1 xn · x2 x3 , which is a multiple of x1 x2 ∈ P0 . For
i = 2, . . . , n − 4, the product of the monomials of Pi is xi yi · xi+1 xi+2 , which is a multiple of xi xi+1 ∈ Pi−1 .
The product of the monomials of Pn−3 is x1 y1 · xn−1 xn , a multiple of x1 xn ∈ P1 . In Pn−2 , we can form three
products: xn−3 yn−3 · xn−2 xn−1 and xn−3 yn−3 · xn−2 yn−2 xn yn , which are multiples of xn−3 xn−2 ∈ Pn−4 , and
xn−2 xn−1 · xn−2 yn−2 xn yn , which is a multiple of xn−1 xn ∈ Pn−3 . As for Pn−1 , we have xn−2 yn−2 · xn−1 yn−1 ,
which is a multiple of xn−2 xn−1 ∈ Pn−2 , xn−2 yn−2 · xn yn , which is an element of Pn−2 , and xn−1 yn−1 · xn yn
which is a multiple of xn−1 xn ∈ Pn−3 . This completes the proof.
Example 3.2 can be generalized as follows.
Example 3.3. Let Cn be a cycle graph with vertex set {x1 , . . . , xn } and add k whiskers to each vertex of Cn .
Let G be the graph obtained in this way and yi,1 , . . . , yi,k be the terminal vertices of the whiskers on xi . Then
lnm jnk
+
k.
bight I(G) = ara I(G) =
2
2
First we define a minimal vertex cover of G. We choose the vertices
lnm
jnk
x2j−1 for all j = 1, . . . ,
and y2j,1 , . . . , y2j,k for all j = 1, . . . ,
.
2
2
Thus
bight I(G) ≥
lnm
2
+
jnk
2
k.
Now we define the same number of polynomials generating I(G) up to radical. We distinguish three cases:
• if n = 3, we set
q 0 = x1 x2
q 1 = x1 x3 + x2 x3
qj+1 = x1 y1,j + x2 y2,j + x3 y3,j
for j ∈ {1, . . . , k}. Thus, by Lemma 2.1, ara I(G) ≤ 2 + k = 32 + 32 k.
• if n is even, let q0 , . . . , qn−1 be as in Example 3.2, with yj replaced by yj,1 for all j = 1, . . . , n. Then set
qn+ n2 (j−2) = x1 y1,j + x2 y2,j
qn+ n2 (j−2)+1 = x3 y3,j + x4 y4,j
..
.
qn+ n2 (j−2)+ n2 −1 = xn−1 yn−1,j + xn yn,j
for j ∈ {2, . . . , k}. According to Lemma 2.1, the polynomials q0 , . . . , qn+ n2 (k−1)−1 generate I(G) up to
radical. Hence ara I(G) ≤ n + n2 (k − 1) = n2 + n2 k.
8
• if n is odd, let q0 , . . . , qn−1 be as in Example 3.2, with yj replaced by yj,1 for all j = 1, . . . , n. Then set
qn+⌊ n ⌋(j−2) = x1 y1,j + x2 y2,j + xn yn,j x3 y3,j
2
qn+⌊ n ⌋(j−2)+1 = x3 y3,j + x4 y4,j + xn yn,j x5 y5,j
2
..
.
qn+⌊ n ⌋(j−2)+⌊ n ⌋−2 = xn−4 yn−4,j + xn−3 yn−3,j + xn yn,j xn−2 yn−2,j
2
2
qn+⌊ n ⌋(j−2)+⌊ n ⌋−1 = xn−2 yn−2,j + xn−1 yn−1,j + xn yn,j
2
2
for j ∈ {2, . . . , k}. By Lemma 2.1, ara I(G) ≤ n + n2 (k − 1) = n2 + n2 k.
Therefore
bight I(G) = ara I(G) =
lnm
2
+
jnk
2
k.
4. The arithmetical rank of some facet ideals
In this section we prove the equality between the arithmetical rank and the (big) height for the facet ideals of
some classes of simplicial complexes obtained by adding one or more facets to every vertex of a given simplicial
complex. Again, we provide explicit formulas. The simplicial complexes considered in the following proposition
are a special case of the so-called grafted simplicial complexes considered by Faridi in [8].
Proposition 4.1. Let ∆ be a simplicial complex on the vertex set V (∆) = {x1 , . . . , xn }. For every vertex xi , we
add a facet Fi of dimension ≥ 1 such that
• Fi ∩ V (∆) = {xi }, for every i = 1, . . . , n,
• Fi ∩ Fj = ∅ if i 6= j, for every i, j = 1, . . . , n.
Let ∆′ be the simplicial complex obtained in this way. Then
ht I(∆′ ) = ara I(∆′ ) = n,
thus I(∆′ ) is a set-theoretic complete intersection.
Proof. From Remark 2.15, it follows that ht I(∆′ ) = n. we show that ara I(∆′ ) ≤ n by proving that the Llengthnof I(∆′ ) is at most
o n. For every facet Fi , we denote by uFi the monomial corresponding to Fi and set
(i)
(i)
Fi = xi , y1 , . . . , ypi . Let us consider the lexicographic ordering of the monomial generators of I(∆′ ), with
(1)
(1)
(n)
x1 < x2 < · · · < xn < y 1 < · · · < y p 1 < · · · < y 1
(n)
< · · · < ypn :
u1,1 u1,2 · · ·
u2,1 · · ·
u1,s1
u2,s2
..
.
uF1
uF2
..
.
uFn
Let α be an admissible symbol for ∆′ consisting of the monomials α1 , . . . , αm , for some m ≥ 1. We want
to show, by induction on n, that α has length at most n. The claim is true for n = 2, because the symbol
consisting of x1 x2 , uF1 , uF2 is not admissible. Let n > 2 and suppose that there are exactly r monomials in
α containing the variable x1 (these are monomials appearing in the
If r = 0,
o
n first row of the above table).
(i)
(i)
then α is an admissible symbol on the vertex set {x2 , . . . , xn } ∪ y1 , . . . , ypi i = 2, . . . , n , so the claim
9
follows by induction.
If r = 1, then the monomials
α2 , . . . , αm form an admissible symbol β on the vertex set
o
n
(i)
(i)
{x2 , . . . , xn }∪ y1 , . . . , ypi i = 2, . . . , n and, by induction, |β| ≤ n−1. Hence |α| = 1+|β| ≤ 1+n−1 = n.
Now suppose that r ≥ 2 and that the monomials of α containing the variable x1 are precisely
α1 = u1,i1 , α2 = u1,i2 , . . . , αr−1 = u1,ir−1 , and αr = u1,ir or αr = uF1 .
We set Vi = {xj | xj divides αi , xj 6= x1 } for every i = 1, . . . , r (if αr = uF1 , then Vr = ∅). Consider, for every
i = 1, . . . , r − 1, the set Vi r Wi , where Wi = Vi+1 ∪ · · · ∪ Vr .
The following two properties hold:
1) Vi r Wi 6= ∅, for every i = 1, . . . , r − 1,
2) (Vi r Wi ) ∩ Vj = ∅, for every 1 ≤ i < j ≤ r − 1.
For the first property, suppose for a contradiction that Vi r Wi = ∅ for some i. Then Vi ⊂ Wi = Vi+1 ∪ · · · ∪ Vr
and this implies that αi divides lcm(αi+1 , . . . , αr ), against the assumption that α is admissible.
The second property is true because Vj ⊂ Wi if 1 ≤ i < j ≤ r − 1.
Note that the indeterminates in Vi ∩ Wi appear both in αi and in some of the monomials αi+1 , . . . , αr . Therefore, for the symbol α to be admissible, at least one indeterminate in Vi r Wi must not appear in the monomials
αr+1 , . . . , αm (otherwise αi divides lcm(αi+1 , . . . , αm )). By virtue of 2), for every j = 1, . . . , r − 1, we can thus
choose an indeterminate xij that appears in αj and does not appear in the monomials αr+1 , . . . , αm , in such
a way that xi1 , . . . , xir−1 are pairwise distinct. It follows that n
the monomials αr+1 , . . . , αm form an admissible
o
(i)
(i)
symbol β on the vertex set {x2 , . . . , xn } r {xi1 , . . . , xir−1 } ∪ y1 , . . . , ypi i ∈ {2, . . . , n} r {i1 , . . . , ir−1 } .
By induction, |β| ≤ n − 1 − (r − 1) = n − r. Then |α| = r + |β| ≤ r + n − r = n.
Corollary 4.2. Let ∆ be a simplicial complex on the vertex set {x1 , . . . , xn }. For every vertex xi , we add mi ≥ 1
facets Fi,1 , . . . , Fi,mi of dimension ≥ 1 such that
• Fi,j ∩ V (∆) = {xi }, for every i = 1, . . . , n and j = 1, . . . , mi ,
• Fi,j ∩ Fi,k = {xi }, for every i = 1, . . . , n and j, k = 1, . . . , mi , j 6= k,
• Fi,j ∩ Fh,k = ∅ if i 6= h, for every i, h = 1, . . . , n, j = 1, . . . , mi and k = 1, . . . , mh .
Call ∆′ the simplicial complex obtained in this way. Then
bight I(∆′ ) = ara I(∆′ ).
Proof. For every facet Fi,j , we denote by uFi,j the monomial corresponding to Fi,j and suppose that
n
o
(i,j)
(i,j)
Fi,j = xi , y1 , . . . , yp(i,j) . Let us consider the lexicographic ordering of the monomial generators of I(∆′ ),
with
(1,1)
x1 < x2 < · · · < xn < y 1
(1,m1 )
< · · · < yp(1,1)
< · · · < y1
(1,1)
u1,1 u1,2 · · ·
u2,1 · · ·
..
.
u1,s1
u2,s2
..
.
(n,mn )
1)
< · · · < yp(1,m
< · · · < y1
(1,m )
1
uF1,1
uF2,1
..
.
xn−1 xn uFn−1,1
uFn,1
···
···
uF1,m1
uF2,m2
..
.
···
···
uFn−1,mn−1
uFn,mn
n)
< · · · < yp(n,m
:
(n,mn )
Let α be an admissible symbol for ∆′ with maximal length and call Γ the simplicial complex ∆ ∪ hF1,1 i ∪ · · · ∪
hFn,1 i, where hF i is the simplex spanned by F . Note that, if uFi,j ∈ α, then uFi,h ∈ α for every h ∈ {1, . . . , mi },
10
otherwise α does not have maximal length. In fact, if uFi,j ∈ α, but uFi,h ∈
/ α for some h 6= j, then the symbol
β obtained by adding uFi,h to α is admissible and |β| > |α|. Now suppose that α consists of the monomials:
uh1 ,j1 , . . . , uhs ,js and uFi1 ,1 , . . . , uFi1 ,mi , . . . , uFik ,1 , . . . , uFik ,mi ,
1
k
ordered as above. We define the set
n
o
(ih ,mih )
(i ,1)
A = y1 h , . . . , y1
h = 1, . . . , k ∪ {xi | i ∈ {1, . . . , n} r {i1 , . . . , ik }} .
(i ,1)
(ih ,mi )
h
Then A is a minimal vertex cover for ∆′ . First note that, for every h ∈ {1, . . . , n}, xh ∈ A or y1 h , . . . , y1
∈
(j1 ,1)
(jt ,1)
∈ A, with j1 , . . . , jt
A. Hence one of the vertices of each Fi,j belongs to A. Moreover, if y1
, . . . , y1
pairwise distinct, then xj1 · · · xjt ∈
/ ∆. Otherwise, the monomial xj1 · · · xjt would precede the monomials
uF(j1 ,1) , . . . , uF(jt ,1) in the above ordering. Since xj1 · · · xjt divides uF(j1 ,1) · · · uF(jt ,1) , this would imply that α
is not admissible, against our assumption. This shows that one of the vertices of each facet of ∆ belongs to A.
(i,j)
Therefore A is a vertex cover for ∆′ . It is minimal, because removing a vertex y1 or a vertex xi would leave
the facet Fi,j uncovered.
Finally, we prove that the length of α is less than or equal to |A|. Consider the symbol β formed by the monomials
uh1 ,j1 , . . . , uhs ,js and uFi1 ,1 , . . . , uFik ,1 .
n
o
(n,1)
(n,1)
(1,1)
(1,1)
This is an admissible symbol on the vertex set x1 , . . . , xn , y1 , . . . , yp(1,1) , . . . , y1 , . . . , yp(n,1) for the simplicial complex Γ. Hence, by Proposition 4.1, s + k ≤ n and it follows that |α| = s + m1 + · · · + mk ≤
m1 + · · · + mk + n − k = |A|. Therefore,
bight I(∆′ ) ≤ ara I(∆′ ) ≤ |α| ≤ |A| ≤ bight I(∆′ ),
where the second inequality follows from Theorem 2.4.
Remark 4.3. Let G be a graph and add mi ≥ 1 whiskers to each vertex of G. Let us call the graph G′ obtained in
this way a multiwhisker graph on G. Then, from Corollary 4.2, it follows that bight I(G′ ) = ara I(G′ ). Example
3.3 provides an explicit formula when G = Cn and mi = k for every i.
References
[1] M. Barile, On the arithmetical rank of the edge ideals of forests. Comm. Algebra 36 (2008), 12, 4678-4703.
[2] M. Barile, D. Kiani, F. Mohammadi and S. Yassemi, Arithmetical rank of the cyclic and bicyclic graphs. J. Algebra Appl.
11 (2012), 2, 14 pp.
[3] W. Bruns and J. Herzog, Cohen-Macaulay Rings. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996.
[4] D. Cook and U. Nagel, Cohen-Macaulay graphs and face vectors of flag complexes. SIAM J. Discrete Math. 26 (2012), 1,
89-101.
[5] A. Dochtermann and A. Engström, Algebraic properties of edge ideals via combinatorial topology. Electron. J. Combin
16 (2009), 2, 24 pp.
[6] V. Ene, O. Olteanu and N. Terai, Arithmetical rank of lexsegment edge ideals. Bull. Mat. Soc. Sci. Mat. Roumanie (N.S.)
53 (2010), 101, 315-327.
[7] S. Faridi, The facet ideal of a simplicial complex. Manuscripta Math. 109 (2002), 159-174.
[8] S. Faridi, Cohen-Macaulay properties of square-free monomial ideals. J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 109 (2005), 2, 299-329.
[9] D. Kiani and F. Mohammadi, On the arithmetical rank of the edge ideals of some graphs. Alg. Coll. 19 (2012), 1, 797-806.
[10] K. Kimura, Lyubeznik resolutions and the arithmetical rank of monomial ideals. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 137 (2009), 11,
3627-3635.
11
[11] K. Kimura and N. Terai, Binomial arithmetical rank of edge ideals of forests. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 141 (2013), 19251932.
[12] M. Kummini, Regularity, depth and arithmetic rank of bipartite edge ideals. J. Algebraic Combin. 30 (2009), 4, 429-445.
[13] G. Lyubeznik, On the local cohomology modules Hai (R) for ideals a generated by monomials in an R-sequence. In
Complete Intersections, Acireale 1983, Lecture Notes in Math., vol.1092, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1984, pp. 214-220.
[14] G. Lyubeznik, A new explicit finite free resolution of ideals generated by monomials in an R-sequence. J. Pure Appl.
Algebra 51 (1988), 1-2, 193-195.
[15] T. Schmitt and W. Vogel, Note on set-theoretic intersections of subvarieties of projective space. Math. Ann. 245 (1979),
3, 247-253.
[16] R.H. Villarreal, Cohen-Macaulay graphs. Manuscripta Math. 66 (1990), 3, 277-293.
Antonio Macchia, Dipartimento di Matematica, Università degli Studi di Bari “Aldo Moro”,
Via Orabona 4, 70125 Bari, Italy
E-mail address: [email protected]
| 0math.AC
|
Towards Practical File Packetizations in
Wireless Device-to-Device Caching Networks
Nicholas Woolsey, Student Member, IEEE, Rong-Rong Chen, Member, IEEE,
arXiv:1712.07221v1 [cs.IT] 19 Dec 2017
and Mingyue Ji, Member, IEEE
Abstract
We consider wireless device-to-device (D2D) caching networks with single-hop transmissions. Previous work has demonstrated that caching and coded multicasting can significantly increase per user
throughput. However, the state-of-the-art coded caching schemes for D2D networks are generally impractical because content files are partitioned into an exponential number of packets with respect to the number
of users if both library and memory sizes are fixed. In this paper, we present two novel combinatorial
approaches to coded caching design in D2D networks with the goal of reducing the required packetization
while keeping the desired throughput gain compared to the conventional uncoded unicasting. The first
proposed approach is based on a novel “hypercube” design, where each user caches a “hyperplane” in
this hypercube and the intersections of “hyperplanes” lead to coded multicasting codewords. In addition,
we also extend this centralized scheme to a decentralized design. The second approach uses the RuzsaSzeméredi graph to define the cache placement and disjoint matchings on this graph represent coded
multicasting opportunities. Both approaches yield an exponential reduction of packetizations with respect
to the number of users while providing a per-user throughput that is comparable to the state-of-the-art
designs in the literature. Furthermore, by using the spatial reuse in D2D networks, besides further reducing
the required packetizations, we demonstrate that the per user throughput can be improved significantly
for some parameter regimes.
Index Terms
Coded Caching, Device-to-Device Communication, Packetization, Spatial Reuse
I. I NTRODUCTION
Wireless caching is a promising approach to significantly improve the user throughput and simultaneously accommodate a large number of user demands in future generations of wireless networks [1]–[13]. In
The authors are with the Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA. (e-mail:
[email protected], [email protected] and [email protected])
2
this paper, we investigate achievable coded caching schemes in device-to-device (D2D) caching networks,
where users strategically cache packets of content files to enable coded multicasting opportunities which
serve distinct content to multiple users simultaneously. Different from the seminal shared link caching
networks [1], where one source node (base station) with access to the entire library serves all the users
over a multicast channel, in D2D networks, users receive requested packets from other users. For such a
network consisting of n users, each caching an equivalent M files out of a library of m files, previous
work demonstrates that when spatial reuse is not allowed, and when M n ≥ m and m ≥ n, meaning
that any transmission can be successfully received by any users in the network, the transmission rate
m
(i.e., normalized traffic load) is Θ M
, which is not a function of n. Hence, the aggregate throughput of
the network is scalable [14].1 This surprising result shows that the transmission rate of the shared link
caching scheme in [1] and D2D caching scheme in [14] are identical for a large number of users.2
D2D caching networks have the potential to provide some unique advantages. For example, D2D
caching networks have a greater flexibility to implement spatial reuse in comparison to shared link
caching networks. The authors in [14] demonstrate that users in a D2D network can be grouped into
clusters based on proximity. These clusters can perform the coded multicasting delivery simultaneously
and surprisingly, the order-optimal traffic load in each cluster is identical to the traffic load when no
clustering is enabled (e.g., consider the entire network as a single cluster). Nevertheless, clustering may
improve per user throughput since the link rate (bits/second/Hz) in each cluster may increase as the size
of each cluster decreases.
The promised gain in per user throughput of the state-of-the-art coded D2D caching schemes relies on
a large amount of file packetization which makes the networks impractical to implement. In particular, if
n
+
no spatial reuse is considered, let t = nM
m ∈ Z , the required number of packets per file, K = t t , which
grows exponentially as the number of users, n, increases. Moreover, a recent study which implements a
shared link caching network with hardware demonstrates that a header packet, labeling the content of the
multicast, must be included with every transmission under some scenarios [15]. The size of this header
will become large as the number of packets per file increases. Spatial reuse in D2D caching networks
partially solves this issue by forming many small user clusters where the number of file partitions decreases
1
Note that when no spatial reuse is allowed, the per user throughput is inversely proportional to the traffic load in the network.
2
We will use the following standard “order” notation: given two functions f and g, we say that: 1) f (n) = O (g(n)) if
there exists a constant c and integer N such that f (n) ≤ cg(n) for n > N . 2) f (n) = o (g(n)) if limn→∞
f (n)
g(n)
= 0. 3)
f (n) = Ω (g(n)) if g(n) = O (f (n)). 4) f (n) = ω (g(n)) if g(n) = o (f (n)). 5) f (n) = Θ (g(n)) if f (n) = O (g(n))
and g(n) = O (f (n)).
3
as the number of clusters increases [14]. However, spatial reuse alone may not be able to reduce the
packetization sufficiently since the number of clusters in the network can be limited.
In this paper, we aim to propose achievable coded caching schemes in D2D networks such that the
packetization of each file is significantly reduced without sacrificing much throughput of the currently
proposed D2D caching schemes. In particular, we propose two combinatorial approaches to design
centralized D2D caching networks. The first approach uses a hypercube to define the cache placement
and we demonstrate how the geometry of this hypercube relates to coded multicasting opportunities for
delivery. The hypercube approach is optimized specifically for D2D caching networks as opposed to
adapting an already studied shared link scheme. In addition, by adopting the idea recently proposed in
[16], we extend this approach to a decentralized coded D2D caching scheme, which allows a much more
flexible design for given network parameters. Meanwhile, the advantage of the reduced packetization of
the hypercube approach still remains in the decentralized D2D caching networks. The second approach
is based on an application of the Ruzsa-Szeméredi graph [17], [18], which is first used for shared link
caching in [19]. In this paper, we extend the use of Ruzsa-Szeméredi graph to D2D caching networks.
For both approaches, while sustaining the significant throughput gain compared to conventional uncoded
unicast [20], the required packetizations are reduced exponentially with respect to the number of users
n while keeping the library size m and memory size M fixed. Finally, we study the impact of enabling
spatial reuse in these caching networks. Besides further reducing the required packetizations, we also
demonstrate that spatial reuse can improve the per user throughput significantly for some parameter
regimes.
The outline of this paper is as follows. In section II, we introduce the D2D network model and problem
formulation. In Section III, we present the hypercube based coded caching approach and analyze its
performance. We also show that this centralized scheme can be used to design a decentralized D2D
caching network. Section IV introduces the Ruzsa-Szeméredi graph based coded caching approach and
analyzes its performance. In Section V, we show how the proposed schemes can take advantage of spatial
reuse. Finally, we conclude the paper in Section VI.
II. N ETWORK M ODEL AND P ROBLEM F ORMULATION
We consider a wireless D2D network with single-hop transmissions formed by the set of users U =
√
{0, . . . , n − 1}. The users are uniformly distributed on a unit grid with a minimum distance of 1/ n
as shown in Fig. 1(a). Each user u ∈ U makes a request fu ∈ F , where F = {1, · · · , m} is a file
library of m independently generated messages {W0 , ..., Wm−1 } with entropy F bits each. We denote
4
the demand vector as f = (f0 , · · · , fn−1 ). The file library, F , is generated once and kept unchanged
during subsequent network operations. In addition, we assume m ≥ n and users request distinct files.
∆
Each user locally caches the equivalent of M files, or M F bits. Furthermore, define t = nM/m ≥ 1, as
the number of times the library is cached collectively among the users.
Users have active links between one another based on the protocol model [21] described as follows.
A communication link, consisting of user u transmitting to user v , will be successful if and only if the
distance between user u and v is less than or equal to r and user v is at least a distance of (1 + ∆)r
from all transmitting users other than user u. The parameters r, ∆ > 0 are given by the protocol model.
We assume that any r > 0 is possible and r dictates a constant data rate, Cr , in the unit of bits/s/Hz.3
The protocol model allows for spatial reuse as shown in Fig. 1(a). Four users, one in each green cluster,
are transmitting to four other local users who are at most a distance of r away. The users receiving the
transmission are at least a distance of (1 + ∆)r from the other three transmitting users. The users of
Fig. 1(a) may be part of a larger network of users as shown in Fig. 1(b) which depicts active clusters
(involved in a successful communication link) in green and non-active clusters (neither receiving or
transmitting) in red. The set of active clusters highlighted in green is one of K sets. K is defined as the
reuse factor or the number of cluster sets such that, for any given set, each cluster of that set can be
active without interference and the K cluster sets collectively include all clusters.
A D2D caching scheme consists of three phases: the cache placement phase, the coded delivery phase,
and the transmission phase. These are defined as follows.
Definition 1: (Cache Placement Phase) The cache placement phase maps the file library F onto the
caches of all users u ∈ U . Every file in F is split into K equally sized packets and each user caches M K
F
packets or equivalently M F bits. For u ∈ U , the function φu : FmF
→ FM
generates cache content
2
2
Zu , φu (Wf : f ∈ F), which are stored in user caches at the beginning, and kept fixed throughout
♦
subsequent operations.
Definition 2: (Coded Delivery Phase) The coded delivery phase is defined by two sets of functions:
the node encoding functions, denoted by {ψu : u ∈ U}, and the node decoding functions, denoted by
{λu : u ∈ U}. Let RuT denote the number of coded bits transmitted by node u to satisfy the demand
vector f . The transmission rate of node u is defined by Ru =
T
Ru
F .
F
The function ψu : FM
× F n → FF2 Ru
2
generates the transmitted message Xu,f , ψu (Zu , f) of node u as a function of its cache content Zu and
3
Note that in practice, Cr can be a function of the transmission range r. However, the protocol model does not capture this
relationship.
5
Fig. 1.
a) Representation of 81 users on a square grid. Users are divided into 9 equally sized clusters of 9 users
based on user proximity. The clusters highlighted in green represent clusters which can be simultaneously active
assuming that cluster highlighted in red are not active. b) A larger network which includes the 81 users of Fig. 1(a)
where the clusters highlighted in green can be simultaneously active. The reuse factor is K = 4.
the demand vector f .4
Let Du denote the set of users whose transmit messages are received by user u (according to some
F
transmission policy in Definition 3). The function λu : F2
P
v∈Du
Rv
F
× FM
× F n → FF2 decodes the
2
request of user u from the received messages and its own cache, i.e., we have
Ŵu,f , λu ({Xv,f : v ∈ Du }, Zu , f).
♦
Since users make arbitrary requests, similar to [1], [14], we focus on the worst-case error probability
defined as
Pe = maxn max P Ŵu,f 6= Wfu .
f∈F
u∈U
For a given number of users n and library size m, letting the transmission rate R =
P
u∈U
Ru , we say
that the cache-rate pair (M, R) is achievable if ∀ ε > 0 there exists a sequence indexed by the file size
F → ∞ of cache encoding functions {φu }, delivery functions {ψu } and decoding functions {λu }, with
(F )
rate R(F ) and probability of error Pe
(F )
such that lim supF →∞ R(F ) ≤ R and lim supF →∞ Pe
≤ ε.
Note that RF gives the achievable total traffic load transmitted in the whole network.
Definition 3: (Transmission Phase) The transmission policy Π is a rule to activate D2D links in the
network. Let L denote the set of all directed links. Let A ⊆ 2L denote the set of all possible feasible
4
We also refer the transmission rate to traffic load in this paper.
6
subsets of links (this is a subset of the power set of L, formed by all sets of links forming independent
sets in the network interference graph induced by the protocol model). Let At ⊂ A denote a feasible
set of simultaneously active links at time t. A feasible transmission policy Π consists of a sequence of
activation sets, i.e., sets of active transmission links, {At : t = 1, 2, 3, . . .}, such that at each time t the
♦
active links in At do not violate the protocol model.
Different from the shared link network model [1], the performance of D2D caching networks cannot
be completely characterized by the transmission rate, R, because of spatial reuse under protocol model.
Hence, we define the per user throughput as follows,
∆
T =
F
,
D
(1)
where D is the number of channel uses required to satisfy all user requests. We say that the pair (M, T )
is achievable if RF is achievable and there exists a transmission policy Π such that the RF encoded bits
can be delivered to their destinations in D ≤ F/T channel uses. Then, the optimal achievable throughput
is defined as
T ∗ (M ) , sup{T : (M, T ) is achievable}.
Remark 1: Note that, when considering clustering and assuming that the transmission rate of each
cluster is exactly Rc , we can obtain D =
Rc F K
Cr .
Therefore, the per user throughput for a clustering
scheme is
Tc =
Cr
.
Rc K
(2)
In the following, we will compare the per user throughput of clustering and non-clustering schemes.
III. H YPERCUBE C ODED C ACHING A PPROACH
√
In this section, we consider the case when the transmission range r ≥ 2. In other words, a transmission
from any node can be received by the rest of the nodes in the network and there is no user clustering.
We first introduce two motivating examples of the proposed hypercube coded caching approach and then
present the general achievable scheme and transmission rate.
A. 2-Dimension Example
In this example, we propose a cache placement and a delivery scheme based on a d = 2 dimensional
hypercube (a plane) lattice. We consider a D2D network with n = 4 users,
m
M
= 2, and t =
nM
m
= 2.
Assume that each user requests a distinct file, i.e., user i requests file fi . The 2-dimensional lattice is
7
constructed where the size of each dimension is
m
M
= 2. Each lattice point represents a set of m packets,
each from a different file in F . For instance, in Fig. 2(a), each lattice point represents {Wi,(j,k) , i ∈ F}
where Wi,(j,k) is a packet from file i ∈ F and the subscript (j, k) represents the corresponding position
on the lattice. Hence, the total number of lattice points equals the number of packets per file. Since in
m t
m d
this case we have t = d = 2, there are K = ( M
) = (M
) = 22 = 4 points in this 2-dimensional lattice,
corresponding to 4 partitions of each file. The number of users equals t times the number of lattice points
on each dimension, i.e., n =
m
Mt
=
m
Md
= 2 · 2 = 4.
For the cache placement, each user caches a line on the lattice as shown in Fig. 2(a). For instance,
user 0 caches Wi,(0,0) and Wi,(0,1) for all i ∈ F . The intersection of two lines represents a set of packets
cached by two users. Each user requests two packets (from its demanded file) each of which is in the
cache of two other users. In the delivery phase, each user unicasts two requested packets to the appropriate
users. In this example, the number of user groups is equivalent to the number of packets per file and
m t
) = 22 = 4 user groups, each with a size of t = 2, i.e., we pick one user from each
there are K = ( M
dimension. User 0 is involved in two user groups, {0, 2} and {0, 3}. Hence, user 0 will send Wf2 ,(0,1) to
user 2 and send Wf3 ,(0,0) to user 3. Therefore, R = 2 since the rate simply equals the number of packets
that the users are missing normalized by the file size. Note that, in this simple example there is a coded
multicasting opportunity. Each user can include their transmitted packets into a single coded multicast.
For instance, user 0 can transmit Wf3 ,(0,0) ⊕ Wf2 ,(0,1) to users 2 and 3, who can decode Wf2 ,(0,1) and
Wf3 ,(0,0) successfully. However, as we will see later, this pattern will not hold for larger values of n and
t. The multicasting opportunities which scale with n and t consist of users transmitting requested packets
to a set of t − 1 users whose cache “planes” are aligned along different dimensions. This will be shown
in the following example.
B. 3-Dimension Example
Mn
m
= 3 and each
m t
= 3 lattice points. Hence, the number of packets per file is K = M
= 27.
We consider a 3-dimensional hypercube (cube in this case), where d = t =
m
dimension consists of M
m
m 2
Let n = M
t= M
= 9 and user i request file i. Similar to the 2-dimensional lattice, each lattice point
on the cube represents a set of m packets, each from a different Wi , i ∈ F (see Fig. 2(b)). For the cache
placement, each user caches all packet sets represented by a plane of lattice points of the cube.
In Fig. 2(b), we show the cache of 3 users, u0 , u1 and u2 , depicted by the red, green and blue planes
which are orthogonal (let users u0 = 2, u1 = 4 and u2 = 8). Given this 3-tuple of orthogonal planes, first
consider the packet set {Wi,(2,1,2) , ∀i ∈ F} which lies on the intersection of all three planes and therefore
8
(a)
(b)
Fig. 2. a) An example of the proposed scheme in a D2D network with n = 4, M/m = 1/2 and K = 4. Each point
on the lattice represents a set of packets. Each user’s cache is represented by a line, where the user caches the points
on the lattice which intersect that line. b) Each point on the 3D-lattice represents a set of packets. Each user’s cache
is represented by a plane of lattice points. The right figure represents a multicasting group, or a collection of 3
planes, where any two are orthogonal. The points on the intersection of two or more of these planes are highlighted.
Every two users in this group share two packets that are requested by the third user.
cached by all 3 users. Any packet from this set does not need to be transmitted among these 3 users. Next,
consider packets which are cached by exactly 2 of the 3 users. This is analogous to the points which lie
on the intersection of exactly 2 out of the 3 planes. The intersection of the red and green planes yields
the points representing the packets Wi,(2,1,0) and Wi,(2,1,1) for all i ∈ F . These packets are cached at
both users u0 and u1 , but not user u2 . It can be seen that Wf8 ,(2,1,0) and Wf8 ,(2,1,1) are requested by user
u2 = 8, and are available at user u0 and u1 . In general, each user among this 3-tuple requests two packets
which are cached at the other two users. Equivalently, this shows a coding opportunity for multicasting
from one user to the other two users within this 3-tuple, which will be shown in the following.
In this delivery phase, each user will multicast the coded packets based on the observations discussed
above. In particular, every 3-tuple of orthogonal planes on the cube (representing the cache content of 3
users) represents a coded multicasting group, where each user multicasts one codeword to the other two
users. For example, in Fig. 2(b), for the depicted 3-tuple of planes (red, blue, green), user u0 transmits
Wf4 ,(2,2,2) ⊕ Wf8 ,(2,1,1) to u1 and u2 ; user u1 transmits Wf2 ,(1,1,2) ⊕ Wf8 ,(2,1,0) to u0 and u2 ; user u2
transmits Wf2 ,(0,1,2) ⊕Wf4 ,(2,0,2) to u0 and u1 . By using the cached packets, each user within this multicast
group can decode the requested packets. In this case, 3 coded multicasting packets are transmitted and
will result in a traffic load of
3
27
= 19 . In general, each user needs packets which are associated with all
lines orthogonal to the plane representing that user’s cache. These lines are formed by the intersections of
9
all planes which are orthogonal to each other and orthogonal to the plane representing the user’s cache.
In other words, each user will receive all requested packets by forming multicasting groups with all pairs
of users for which all three users cache a plane orthogonal to each other. The total number of 3-tuples,
or multicasting groups, is equivalent to the number of lattice points, K . The transmission rate is equal
m t
to the product of the number of multicasting groups, K = M
= 27, the number of transmissions per
t
m
1
group, t = 3, and the size of each transmission, 1/ M
= 27
. Therefore, R = 3.
m 2
C. General Achievable Scheme for n = ( M
)
We build a hypercube lattice with t dimensions and each dimension has
m
M
lattice points in length.
Each lattice point represents a set of m packets, each from a different i ∈ F . Each user caches packets
represented by the lattice points of a distinct (t − 1)-dimensional hyperplane of the hypercube by holding
one dimension constant and allowing other dimensions to vary. In the delivery phase, each multicast group
comprises of users, each of which caches a hyperplane that is “orthogonal” to the cached hyperplanes
of every other user in the group. Within these groups, users multicast a set of coded packets requested
by other users in the group. Formally, the cache placement and delivery phase are as follows:
m t
• Cache Placement Phase: For all Wi ∈ F , partition file Wi into M
packets of equal size labeled
m
as Wi,(`0 ,...,`t−1 ) where `j ∈ {0, . . . , M
− 1} for all j ∈ {0, . . . , t − 1}. Let user u ∈ U cache a
set of packets {Wi,(`0 ,...,`t−1 ) , i = 1, · · · , m} such that `j = (u mod
m
M ),
m
where j = bu/ M
c, and
m
m t−1
`i ∈ {0, . . . , M
− 1} for any i 6= j . Hence, each user caches ( M
)
packets from each file i ∈ F .5
•
Delivery Phase: Consider all sets of users S = {u0 , . . . , ut−1 } ⊂ {0, . . . , n − 1} such that
m
buj / M
c = j for all j ∈ {0, . . . , t − 1} and |S| = t. Each user ui ∈ S transmits
⊕s∈{0,...,t−1}\i Wfus ,(a0 ,...,at−1 )
(3)
where
aq =
(us + s − i) mod
uq mod
m
M,
m
M,
if q = s
(4)
if q 6= s
The correctness of the proposed scheme is shown in Appendix A. To illustrate the notations of the
general scheme, we re-state the 3-dimensional example discussed in Section III-B as follows.
5
Throughout this paper, we use the following definition for the modulo operation: a mod b = a − ba/bc. It follows that if
a ∈ Z and b ∈ Z+ , then a mod b is a non-negative integer in the range of [0, b − 1].
10
m 2
1) An Example Using General Scheme for n = ( M
) : In Fig. 2(b), the selected multicast group
is a set of three users: S = {2, 4, 8}. We relabel these users so that u0 = 2, u1 = 4 and u2 = 8.
m
This satisfies the condition that j = buj / M
c for j ∈ {0, . . . , t − 1}, which ensures that these 3
users cache planes orthogonal to each other. Moreover, S ⊂ {0, . . . , n − 1} and |S| = t. Using (3)
and (4), user u0 (user 2) includes a packet in a multicast for all s ∈ {0, 1, 2} \ 0. Those packets
are Wfu1 ,(u0 mod
m
M
,(u1 +1) mod
values of u0 , u1 , u2 and
m
M
m
M
,u2 mod
m
M
)
and Wfu2 ,(u0 mod
m
M
,u1 mod
m
M
,(u2 +2) mod
m
M
).
Substituting the
yields packets Wf4 ,(2,2,2) and Wf8 ,(2,1,1) which match the packets u0 transmits
in Fig. 2(b).
In the cache placement phase, user 2 caches all packets Wi,(2,`1 ,`2 ) for i ∈ {0, ..., m − 1} and `1 , `2 ∈
{0, 1, 2}. Both packets transmitted by user 2 satisfy these conditions. Furthermore, user 4 only caches
packets {Wi,(`0 ,1,`2 ) }, and user 8 only caches packets {Wi,(`0 ,`1 ,2) }. Hence, we recognize that Wf4 ,(2,2,2)
is in user 8’s cache, but not in user 4’s cache and the opposite is true for Wf8 ,(2,1,1) . Therefore, both user
4 and 8 can decode the requested packet as they have the other packet of the coded multicast cached. A
similar argument will show the coded multicasts from users 4 and 8 follow (3) and (4) can effectively
deliver the requested packets to users {2, 8} and {2, 4}, respectively.
D. Achievable Rate and Packetization
The achievable rate using the proposed hypercube based approach is given by the following theorem.
Theorem 1: Let m, n, M be the library size, number of users and the cache size per user, respectively.
√
m 2 m
, M ∈ Z+ and t ≥ 2, the following rate is achievable:
For r ≥ 2, n = M
Rhc (M ) =
with the requirement of K = K hc =
√
√
n
n
m
M
(5)
.
Proof: The number of packets per file is equal to
m t m nM/m √ √
n
K hc =
=
= n ,
M
M
m
M,
or the number of lattice points of each dimension,
(6)
raised to the power equal to the number of
dimensions, t.
The multicast groups consist of all possible user sets such that one user is selected from t (number
m t
m
of dimensions) sets of M
(number of lattice points per dimension) users. Therefore, there are M
m t
multicast groups for which each of t users transmits a codeword with a length of 1/ M
F . The rate
is then
hc
R (M ) =
m t
M
·t·
F
1
t
m
(M
)
F
=t=
nM
m
=
m
M
(7)
11
where n =
m 2
M .
The throughput achieved by the proposed achievable scheme is given as follows.
m
M
Corollary 1: Let Cr be the constant link rate under the protocol model. For r ≥
√
2, n =
m 2
M ,
∈ Z+ and t ≥ 2, the throughput achieved by the proposed scheme is:
T hc (M ) =
Cr
hc
R (M )
=
M
Cr
m
(8)
Proof: Following (1), in order to deliver F Rhc (M ) coded bits without spatial reuse (at most one
active link transmitting at any time), we need D = F Rhc (M )/Cr channel uses. Therefore, we obtain
(8).
E. Extension of the achievability to n ≤
m 2
M
From the construction of the hypercube scheme, we see that within each multicasting group, each user
m
m 2
m
us ∈ S needs to receive M
− 1 packets from t − 1 users. When n = M
− 1,
, we have t − 1 = M
meaning that each of the t − 1 users in S \ us sends c = 1 packet to user us . This guarantees a symmetric
multicasting group, where every user transmits the same number of coded packets. The work of [14]
demonstrated that a caching scheme with symmetric multicasting groups generally results in an overall
smaller transmission rate than that of a caching network with asymmetric multicasting groups.
A more general condition that makes the multicasting groups symmetric is
c(t − 1) =
m
− 1,
M
(9)
where c ∈ Z+ . In this case, for a multicasting group, each user requests c(t − 1) packets that the rest of
the t − 1 users have cached. Each user transmits c packets that a user requests. Note that these c packets
cannot be included in a single coded multicast because the receiving user cannot decode more than one
unknown packet and therefore cannot recover the requested packets. Hence, for each multicasting group,
each user will transmit c coded multicast messages. In this case, the required number of packets per file
m t
m
K = Kghc = M
is identical to K hc . By substituting c = ( M
− 1)/(t − 1), the transmission rate is
given by
M
.
(10)
M
M
m
m 2
We note that an exact description of the extension to the case of n ≤ M
requires a modification of
2
m
the delivery phase shown in Section III-C for n = M
and its correctness follows from a modified
Rghc (M ) =
m t m −t
ct =
t m
t−1M
1−
version of the proof in Appendix A. These are omitted due to space limitation.
12
F. Comparison to State-of-the-Art D2D Caching Networks
As was proposed in [14], the achievable rate and packetization pair is
m
n
m
n
M
0
0
(R , K ) =
1−
,t
=
− 1, t
.
M
m
t
M
t
Implementing Stirling’s formula demonstrates that
s
m
M
m
M
n
M
K0 = t
∼
eln n+n( m ln M +(1− m ) ln m−M ) ,
t
2π(m − M )
(11)
(12)
as n → ∞. We are interested by what factor the hypercube approach has reduced the necessary
packetizations in comparison to the scheme in [14]:
s
M
m
K0
M
∼
eln n+n(1− m ) ln m−M ,
hc
2π(m − M )
Kg
(13)
which grows exponentially as n → ∞. Furthermore, we are interested in comparing R0 and R achieved
by the scheme in [14] and the proposed hypercube based approach. Hence, we obtain
R0 (M )
t−1
m
=
=1−
,
t
nM
Rghc (M )
(14)
It is clear that, given a constant m and M ,
K0
= ∞,
n→∞ Kghc
(15)
R0 (M )
= 1.
hc (M )
n→∞ Rg
(16)
lim
and
lim
The hypercube approach demonstrates a significant decrease in the number of packetizations, especially
as the number of users becomes large. Furthermore, the rate only increases slightly, and for a large
number of users the rate of the two schemes are essentially equivalent.
G. Decentralized Coded Caching using Proposed Schemes
Using the idea of [16], we will now explore the use of centralized D2D caching schemes to design
decentralized coded D2D caching networks. A decentralized network consists of n users, randomly caches
√
2. A centralized cache
a M
m fraction of content files. In the following, we focus on the case that r ≥
placement phase defines sets of packets from which users randomly cache one of these sets independently
of other users’ cache. Then, a modified delivery phase is used to serve the user requests.
More specifically, we consider the file partition and cache placement of the proposed D2D caching
scheme designed for n0 (dummy) users such that each of them caches a
M
m
fraction of the content files,
13
where n0 n.6 This means that we partition each file into K 0 =
cache placement proposed in Section III-C and III-E, where t0 =
0
m t
M
n0 M
m .
packets defined by the centralized
Then, we have n0 sets of packets
and each of which is designed to be cached by one of the n0 dummy users. Each of the n users in the
decentralized network randomly caches one of the n0 packet sets defined by the centralized scheme. The
probability of caching any packet set is
1
n0 .
The coded multicasting opportunities become clear as we
consider subsets of users in the network who have collectively cached all of the n0 packet sets exactly
once. In this case, these users can have their requests satisfied by performing the corresponding delivery
phase defined by the centralized scheme. This process is repeated until the remaining unsatisfied users do
not collectively cache all packet sets. These remaining users are served with a slightly modified delivery
phase. The following example demonstrates this process for the hypercube approach.
1) An Example: In this example, a decentralized network of n = 32 users and each user caches
of the library. Let n0 = 6 and t0 =
n0 M
m
M
m
=
1
3
= 2. There are 6 packet sets defined by a 2-dimensional hypercube
described in Section III-E. As shown in Fig. 3, there are
m
M
= 3 lattice points on each dimension of the
0
m t
) = 9.
hypercube. The number of packets per file for this decentralized network is K 0 = Kghc = ( M
The packet sets, corresponding to each row or column of the hypercube, are labeled as Zi,j where
m
i ∈ {0, . . . , t0 − 1} and j ∈ {0, . . . , M
− 1}. Each of the 32 users caches one of these sets at random
using a uniform distribution, independently of other users, such that each set has an equal probability of
being cached at any given user. A possible outcome of the random caching is shown in Fig. 3. Let the
random variable Xi,j be the number of users that cache Zi,j and xi.j be the realization of Xi,j . In this
case, we have x0,0 = 6, x0,1 = 3, x0,2 = 6, x1,0 = 7, x1,1 = 6 and x1,2 = 4. For instance, 6 users cache
the 0-th row of packets, Z0,0 , and 4 users cache the 2nd column of packets, Z1,2 .
To satisfy the 32 distinct user requests, there are multiple delivery phases. First, observe that we can
choose min{x0,0 , x0,1 , x0,2 , x1,0 , x1,1 , x1,2 } = 3 non-overlapping user sets each consisting of 6 users who
collectively cache the 6 packet sets (see Fig. 3(a)). These 3 user sets can perform the delivery phases as
if they were centralized networks. After this, there are 32 − 3 · 6 = 14 remaining users with unsatisfied
requests as shown in Fig. 3(b). Of these remaining users, we consider a set of 5 users who collectively
cache every packet set except Z0,1 . These 5 users can perform a centralized delivery scheme by including
one previously satisfied user who caches Z0,1 .7 In the third phase, as shown in Fig. 3(c), of the remaining
14 − 1 · 5 = 9 unsatisfied users, we consider 2 sets of 4 users who collectively cache the packet sets Z0,0 ,
6
Note that n0 is only a dummy variable to define the packet sets for the n users in the decentralized network to cache.
7
We can simply let a satisfied user request empty packets.
14
user group not
considered
6
3
2
--
3
--
--
--
6
3
2
--
# of 7
6
users
3 delivery phases
(a)
4
4
3
1
1 delivery phase
(b)
3
2
--
2 delivery phases
(8 of 9 user groups)
(c)
1
--
--
1 delivery phase
(3 of 9 user groups)
(d)
Fig. 3. A depiction of the caching and delivery phases using the hypercube approach to design decentralized D2D
caching networks. The lattice structure represents the file packetization and the numbers to the left and bottom of
the lattice are the number of remaining unsatisfied users who cache the rows and columns respectively. The red
“X”s represent pairs of users that are not considered in the delivery phase.
Z0,2 , Z1,0 and Z1,1 . These user sets can perform the delivery phases by including previously satisfied
users that cache Z0,1 and Z1,2 . Note that the points of the 3 by 3 lattice not only represent a packet for
every file in the library, but also represent all multicasting groups in the delivery phase. In this particular
example, there is one multicasting group marked by the red “X” in Fig. 3(c) that does not need to be
considered since both users in this multicasting group are satisfied. Similarly, after the delivery shown in
Fig. 3(c), we are left with a single user (but forming 3 multicast groups) who can obtain the requested
packets from the 3 users caching these packets. The transmission rate of this example is given by
1
220
8
0
Rghc =
.
(17)
R = 3+1+2· +3·
9
9
9
This decentralized scheme does not require any additional packetization. Interestingly, note that the
transmission rate of this scheme is even larger than that of conventional unicasting with Ru = n 1 − M
m =
64
3 .
This occurs because there is only unicasting for the 2-dimensional hypercube approach and we
assume every user transmits in every applicable user pair (multicasting group), which allows unnecessary
transmissions as users would be transmitting to users with previously satisfied requests (e.g., in Fig. 3(b),
we assume users still serve users caching the packet sets of the middle row). We want to emphasize
that this example is just for the purpose of illustration and this effect on the overestimation of the rate
diminishes for a larger values n and t0 (see Fig. 4).
2) General Decentralized Algorithm: In this subsection, we describe a general algorithm for using the
hypercube scheme for the design of decentralized coded D2D caching networks. The cache placement
15
and delivery phases are defined as follows:
0
•
Cache Placement Phase: Define n0 n such that t0 = nmM ∈ Z+ . For all k ∈ F , split file
0
m t
m
k into M
packets of equal size labeled as Wk,(`0 ,...,`t0 −1 ) where `q ∈ {0, . . . , M
− 1} for all
m
q ∈ {0, . . . , t0 − 1}. For all i ∈ {0, . . . , t0 − 1} and j ∈ {0, . . . , M
− 1}, define packet set Zi,j to
include all packets Wk,(`0 ,...,`t0 −1 ) such that `i = j . Let every user u ∈ {0, . . . , n − 1} uniformly
caches one of the n0 packets sets at random with probability
•
Delivery Phase: Define X as a t0 ×
m
M
1
n0 .
matrix where element xi,j equals the number of users who
cache the packet set Zi,j . While X has non-zero elements, we do the following. 1) let Xi∗ be the
P 0 −1 ∗
number of zero elements in the i-th row of X ; let X̂ ∗ = ti=0
Xi . 2) let x be the minimum non-zero
element of X . 3) let user sets {S1 , . . . , Sx } be disjoint sets each of which contains n0 −X̂ ∗ unsatisfied
users. Each of this user set collectively caches every packet set Zi,j that satisfies xi,j 6= 0; 4) define
user sets {S10 , . . . , Sx0 } such that each user set has size X̂ ∗ and collectively caches every packet set
Zi,j that satisfies xi,j = 0. Note that Sk ∩ Sk0 = ∅. 5) for each k ∈ {1, . . . , x}, let users in Sk ∪ Sk0
Q 0 −1 ∗
perform a centralized hypercube D2D delivery phase while ignoring the ti=1
Xi multicasting
groups which contain only previously satisfied users; 6) update xi,j as xi,j = max(0, xi,j − x). 7)
go back to step 1) until all elements in X are zero.
3) Performance: Performance of the decentralized design is given in the following theorem.
Theorem 2: Let m, n, M be the library size, number of users and the cache size per user, respectively.
√
0
m
m
− 1, where ( M
, c) ∈ Z+ , t0 = nmM ≥ 2, and the required number
Assume that r ≥ 2, c(t0 − 1) = M
0
m t
of packets per file K 0 = M
. Furthermore, if n ≥ βn0 log n0 for some β > 1, then all the packet sets
can be cached in the network with probability 1 − n0 1−β , and the following transmission rate is achieved
with probability 1 − o(1) as n, n0 → ∞,
Rdhc (M )
t0 m
≤ kα 0
t −1M
M
1−
m
,
(18)
where
kα =
n
n0
0
m
(dβ − 1 + α) log n0 t0t−1 M
1− M
m ,
q
0
n
2n
t m
M
0
+
α
log
n
n0
n0
t0 −1 M 1 − m ,
q
0
2n log n0
t m
1 log log n0
+
1 − α 2 log n0
n0
t0 −1 M 1 −
if n = βn0 log n0 ,
if ω (n0 log n0 ) = n ≤ n · polylog(n),
3
M
,
if
n
=
ω
n
(log
n)
.
m
(19)
Here, α > 1, dβ is a number depending only on β and polylog(n) denotes the class of functions
S
k
k≥1 O (log n) .
16
Proof: First, we show that with probability 1 − n0 1−β , all the packet sets can be cached in the D2D
network. Since each packet set is uniformly selected by each user at random, it can be observed that it
is a famous “bin-ball” problem, where the packet sets are the n0 bins and users are the n balls. Hence,
we need to characterize the probability that no bin is empty. Let Yk demote the event that the k bin is
empty, then we can compute
P (Yk ) =
1
1− 0
n
n
0
≤ e−n/n .
(20)
Hence
P ∩k Yk
X
0
= P ∪k Yk = 1 − P (∪k Yk ) ≥ 1 −
P (Yk ) ≥ 1 − n0 e−n/n
k
0 −βn0 log n0 /n0
≥ 1−ne
=1−n
0 1−β
.
(21)
Second, we will show (18) holds with probability 1 − o(1). Let L denote the maximum number of users
that cache the same packet sets, or equivalently, the maximum number of balls in each bin. This problem
is to find kα such that the tail estimate P {L ≥ kα } ∩ ∩k Yk = 1 − o(1). Hence, by using (10), we
0
m
t0 m
M
can obtain Rdhc (M ) ≤ L t0t−1 M
1− M
m ≤ kα t0 −1 M 1 − m with probability 1 − o(1). From Theorem
1 in [22], we can show that if kα , α > 1 satisfies (19), then we must have P ({L ≥ kα }) = 1 − o(1).
Furthermore, since
P ({L ≥ kα }) = P {L ≥ kα } ∩ ∩k Yk + P ({L ≥ kα } ∩ {∪k Yk })
= P {L ≥ kα } ∩ ∩k Yk + P ({∪k Yk }) P ({L ≥ kα } | {∪k Yk })
1−β
,
≤ P {L ≥ kα } ∩ ∩k Yk + n0
(22)
we obtain P {L ≥ kα } ∩ ∩k Yk ≥ P ({L ≥ kα }) − n0 1−β = 1 − o(1). This completes the proof.
4) Simulation Methods and Results: Decentralized networks are simulated with the number of users,
n, equals to 1000 and 10000 users, respectively. For these networks we simulate a decentralized cache
scheme for all parameter pairs, n0 , t0 ∈ Z+ , such that t0 ≥ 3, n0 ≤ 64 for the network of 1000 users and
n0 ≤ 500 for the network of 10000 users, and c (t0 − 1) =
m
M
− 1 holds, where c ∈ Z+ and t0 =
n0 M
m .
For each parameter pair, 104 decentralized cache placement and delivery phases are simulated. Given
that n0 n in all cases, there were no instances of a simulated decentralized network where a packet
set was not cached at least once. The mean and standard deviation of the rate, µR and σ , respectively,
are depicted in Fig. 4.
From these results, we can see that the decentralized hypercube scheme outperforms the uncoded
scheme. On both plots, the set of points with a fixed t0 is highlighted. As t0 increases, the rate comes
17
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Results of the hypercube approach decentralized D2D caching network simulations for n = 1000 users
(left plot) and n = 10000 users (right plot). The mean rate µR = E Rdhc (M ) plus or minus 3 times the standard
Fig. 4.
deviation, µR ± 3σ, for a variety of hypercube constructions are compared to the uncoded rate and centralized rate.
closer to the centralized coded rate. However, the number of packets per file, K 0 , increases exponentially.
This exciting result demonstrates that there is a trade-off in designing decentralized D2D caching networks
using the hypercube approach. Specifically, we can increase the number of packets to reduce the rate
and vice versa. This may provide the flexibility to yield a practical amount of packetization while having
limited impact on the transmission rate. Furthermore, we can see that the decentralized approach yields
more realizable constructions of the hypercube. In fact, as shown in Fig. 4, the number of realizable
hypercube schemes for 1000 and 10000 users are 2 and 3 respectively (t = 4, 10 for n = 1000 and
t = 4, 10, 100 for n = 10000). In comparison, the decentralized network design provides many more
possibilities.
IV. RUZSA -S ZEM ÉREDI GRAPH C ODED C ACHING A PPROACH
While the hypercube approach requires significantly (in fact, exponentially) less number of packets per
file compared to [14], the hypercube approach still yields an exponential number of packets relative to
n if m and M are fixed. While the hypercube approach certainly increases the domain for which a D2D
caching network is implementable, it is still an open question as to whether there exists a coded D2D
√
caching network scheme without spatial reuse (r > 2) with a sub-exponential number of packets per file.
Motivated by [19], in this section we propose a coded D2D caching scheme based on Ruzsa-Szeméredi
graphs which requires only a sub-quadratic packetization.
18
A. Ruzsa-Szeméredi Graphs
In this section, we focus on a specific Ruzsa-Szeméredi graph design, which was first introduced in
[17] and used in a novel manner in [19] to construct a cache placement and coded multicasting scheme
for a shared link caching network. Let G(V, E) be an undirected graph, where V is the vertex set and E
is the edge set. We introduce the following definitions [18], [19].
Definition 4: Given a graph G(V, E), a matching M in G is a set of pairwise non-adjacent edges; that
is, no two edges share a common vertex.
♦
Definition 5: The set of edges M ∈ E is an induced matching if for the set S of all the vertices incident
on the edges in M, the induced graph GS contains no other edges apart from those in the matching M.
♦
Definition 6: A disjoint matching M is a matching such that any pair of the edges in M are not
adjacent to any third edge in E .
♦
Definition 7: A graph G(V, E) is called an (γ, τ )−Ruzsa-Szeméredi (RS) Graph if its set of edges
consists of τ pairwise disjoint induced matching, each of size γ .
♦
An example of RS graph is shown in Fig. 5(a), which is also used in [19]. We will apply RuzsaSzeméredi graph to construct a cache placement and a coded multicasting scheme in wireless D2D
caching networks. In this section, we will focus on the case that a transmission from any node can be
√
received and successfully decoded by all nodes in the network (e.g., r ≥ 2). In the remainder of this
section, we will first introduce a motivating example and then present the general achievable scheme.
B. An Example
Similar to [19], our proposed scheme is based on RS Graphs. In this example, let m = n = 6 and
M = 4. Each file is partitioned into 4K packets with F/K bits each. Without loss of generality, we
let user u request file u. To find the cache placement and the coded multicasting scheme, we build a
(2, 3)-Ruzsa-Szeméredi graph G with 6 vertices as shown in Fig. 5(a) where each vertex is represented
by 3 packets. In our proposed achievable scheme, we partition each file into n(2γ − 1) = 18 packets
and denote the j th packet from file i by Wi,j , i ∈ {1, · · · 6}, j ∈ {1, · · · , 18}. The cache placement and
coded multicasting scheme are shown in Fig. 5(b), where each vertex represents a user and his cached
packets are shown inside each vertex. For instance, the most left vertex, vertex 1, represents user 1 and
his cached packets, which are Wi,j , where i ∈ {1, · · · , 6} and j ∈ {1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15}.
Note that these exclude the packets represented by its neighboring vertices, vertex 2 and vertex 6, which
are shown in Fig. 5(b).
19
Vertex 2
Vertex 3
User 2
Wi,4 , Wi,5 , Wi,6
Wi,7 , Wi,8 , Wi,9
Wi,j
j 2 {4, 5, 6, 10, 11, 12
13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18}
Vertex 1
Vertex 4
Wi,10 , Wi,11 , Wi,12
Wi,1 , Wi,2 , Wi,3
Wi,13 , Wi,14 , Wi,15
Vertex 6
Vertex 5
W1,4
W3,4
W4,14
W5,16
W5,11 W2,7 W5,17
W6,13 W1,16 W4,8
W2,1
W4,13
W5,10 W1,17
W6,14
W6,2
User 1
User 4
Wi,j
j 2 {1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15}
Wi,16 , Wi,17 , Wi,18
User 3
Wi,j
j 2 {1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9
13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18}
W3,10
W4,7
W6,1
W2,9
W1,18
W3,6 W5,18 W1,6
W3,12 W4,9 W2,8
Wi,j
W1,5
W3,11 W6,3
W2,2 W5,12
W2,3
W3,5
W4,15
W6,15
j 2 {4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
10, 11, 12, 16, 17, 18}
Wi,j
j 2 {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
7, 8, 9, 13, 14, 15}
User 6
User 5
(a)
Wi,j
j 2 {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
10, 11, 12, 16, 17, 18}
(b)
Fig. 5. a) A (2, 3)-Ruzsa-Sezmeredi graph with 6 vertices which represents a coded caching scheme where n = 6,
M/m = 2/3, and K = n(2γ − 1) = 3n = 18. The graph can be split into τ = 3 induced pairwise disjoint
matchings denoted by different colors in the graph, which cover all edges of the original graph. b) An example of
the proposed scheme in a D2D network with n = m = 6, K = 18 and M = 4. Each vertex represents a user. The
content of each rectangle represents cached packets. The coded multicast packets are shown in the center of the
figure.
The coded multicasting scheme is shown in the center of Fig. 5(b). For example, user 1 transmits
W2,1 ⊕ W4,13 ⊕ W5,10 , which are used by users 2, 4, 5 to decode packets W2,1 , W4,13 , W5,10 , respectively.
In particular, it can be seen that user 2 has W4,13 and W5,10 such that he can decode W2,1 . Similarly,
user 4 and 5 can also decode the corresponding packet in a similar manner. In this example, if we use the
achievable scheme proposed in [14], each file is split into t nt = 4 64 = 60 packets and the transmission
rate is given by
m
M
−1 =
6
4
− 1 = 12 . While using the proposed scheme, the transmission rate is
12
18
= 23 .
Therefore, the proposed scheme requires K = 18 instead of K = 60 as the scheme in [14], and the
achievable transmission rate of the proposed scheme is
2
3
instead of
1
2
achived by the scheme in [14].
Hence, we observe that while sacrificing the transmission rate by ( 23 − 21 )/ 12 =
scheme reduces the number of packets needed per file by
60−18
60
=
7
10
1
3
= 33%, the proposed
= 70%.
C. General Achievable Scheme
In this section, we generalize the deterministic caching and coded delivery scheme illustrated in Section
IV-B to the general case of m, n and M .
20
•
Building the Ruzsa-Szeméredi graph: We build a Ruzsa-Szeméredi graph with n vertices, each
with a degree of n − t. This graph consists of τ pairwise disjoint induced matchings and each has
γ edges.
•
Cache Placement Phase: The cache placement scheme is closely related to the scheme in [19]
and is designed according to the Ruzsa-Szeméredi graph. Each file is divided into K = n(2γ − 1)
packets, labeled by {Wi,j , i = 1, · · · , m, j = 1, · · · , K}. Each vertex in the RS graph represents
2γ − 1 distinct packets. Node u caches packets corresponding to those vertices that are not adjacent
to itself and packets corresponding to the vertex itself.
•
Delivery Phase: As a consequence of the caching scheme described above, any subset of 2γ − 1
nodes belonging to a disjoint matching of size γ in U = {1, . . . , n} has the property that they share
2γ − 1 packets from each file. Consider one such subset. For any file requested by the remaining
(2γ)-th node, by construction, there are 2γ − 1 packets shared by the other 2γ − 1 nodes and needed
by the (2γ)-th node. Therefore, each node in every disjoint matching has 2γ − 1 packets that are
useful for the remaining 2γ −1 nodes. Furthermore, such sets of packets are disjoint (empty pairwise
intersections). For delivery, in each disjoint matching, each node computes the XOR of its 2γ − 1
useful packets and multicasts it to all other nodes in this disjoint matching. In this way, for every
multicast transmission exactly 2γ −1 nodes will be able to decode a useful packet using “interference
cancellation” based on their cached content.
The achievable rate is given in the following.
Theorem 3: Let m, n, M be the library size, number of users and the cache size per user, respectively.
√
For r ≥ 2, n = Λz , where Λ is any positive integer such that z ≥ 2Λ, and
1
M = 2mn− 2Λ4 ln Λ ,
and let t =
nM
m
(23)
∈ Z+ , the following rate is achievable:
RRS (M ) =
with the requirement that K = K RS = (2γ − 1)n.
τ 2γ
n 2γ − 1
(24)
Proof: Theorem 1 is proved in Appendix B.
When we consider the asymptotic regime as n becomes large, we obtain the following corollary.
√
Corollary 2: For r ≥ 2, when n → ∞, K = O n2−δ and M = 2mn−c1 δ exp(−c2 /8) , where c1 , c2
are some positive constants, let t =
nM
m
∈ Z+ , the following rate is achievable:
RRS (M ) ≤ nδ + o(nδ ),
(25)
21
where δ =
2 ln 10.5
ln Λ .
Corollary 2 can be proved using the value of τ given in Appendix B and the relation γ = O (n/τ ).
From Corollary 2, we can see that when Λ is large enough, or equivalently, n is large enough, δ can
be arbitrarily small. In other words, it can be computed from (25) that RRS (M ) = (10.5)2 logΛ n . The
throughput achieved by the proposed achievable scheme is given as follows.
Corollary 3: Let Cr be the constant link rate under the protocol model. For r ≥
√
2, the per user
throughput is given by
T RS (M ) =
Cr
RRS (M )
= C√2 · n−δ + o n−δ ,
n→∞
where RRS (M ) and δ are given by (24) or (25), is achievable.
(26)
Proof: This corollary can be proved by using the same procedure as the proof of Corollary 1.
D. Comparison to Other Schemes
Due to the sub-quadratic packetization with the number of users n, which is significantly lower than
that of the hypercube based approach proposed in Section III, the achievable rate of the RS graph based
√
design given by (5) and (25) for r ≥ 2 is obviously worse than the achievable rate of the hypercube
based design given in (10) and the original design [14], when n increases and m and M are fixed.
However, there is still a significant gain in terms of transmission rate compared to the conventional
uncoded unicasting scheme in some parameter regimes. In the following, we compare the transmission
rates of the uncoded scheme, Ru , and the RS Graph scheme, RRS where m, M and n are the same for
both schemes. By solving (23) for n we obtain
m 2Λ4 ln Λ
n= 2
M
(27)
which better defines the constraint relating n to M/m for the this scheme based on the proposed RS
graph design. For the purposes of comparison, (27) holds for both the uncoded and RS schemes. The
transmission rate for the uncoded scheme is
M
m 2Λ4 ln Λ
M
u
R =n 1−
= 2
1−
.
m
M
m
Furthermore, the transmission rate of the RS scheme given by (5) is
2γ
2γ m 4Λ4 ln 10.5
RRS =
nδ =
2
2γ − 1
2γ − 1 M
(28)
(29)
Then we obtain
M
Ru
2γ − 1 m 2Λ4 (ln Λ−2 ln 10.5)
=
2
1−
.
RRS
2γ
M
m
(30)
22
Notice that, (30) is only dependent on M , m and Λ and not dependent on z . This occurs because z is a
m
function of M , m and Λ and for these derivations z is essentially substituted with z = 2Λ4 ln 2 M
/ ln Λ.
2Λ4 ln(2 m )
2 ln 10.5
M
This result demonstrates that for a fixed m/M and Λ > 10.52 , by using τ = Λ ln Λ (1+ ln Λ +o(1))
(see Appendix B), we have8
Ru
Ru
=
lim
= ∞,
n→∞ RRS
Λ→∞ RRS
lim
(31)
which shows a significant gain in terms of transmission rate of the RS graph approach compared to
uncoded unicasting scheme.
Remark 2: It can be seen that the idea of designing the decentralized coded caching approach discussed
in Section III-G can also be extended to the RS graph coded caching methods. The major difference
is that the packet sets, each of which will be randomly and uniformly cached by users, are constructed
based on the RS graph. The delivery procedure is similar to that in Section III-G.
V. ACHIEVABILITY WITH S PATIAL R EUSE
In this section, we choose (e.g., reduce) the transmission range r in order to have localized D2D
√
communication such that some spatial reuse is allowed. In contrast to the regime where r ≥ 2, in
this case, we also need to design a non-trivial transmission policy to schedule concurrent active D2D
transmissions. Similar to the scheduling schemes in [14], the proposed policy is based on clustering: the
network is divided into clusters of equal size gc users. Users are allowed to receive messages only from
nodes in the same cluster.9 Therefore, each cluster is treated as a smaller network compared to the entire
network. Assuming that gc M ≥ m,10 the total cache size of each cluster is sufficient to store the entire
file library. Under this assumption, the cache placement and delivery schemes introduced in Sections
III-C and IV-C can be applied to each cluster. Hence, it can been seen that the transmission rate in each
cluster is given by either
Rchc (M )
8
tc m
=
tc − 1 M
M
1−
m
,
(32)
Note that the RS graph based approach cannot perform worse than the uncoded unicasting by the construction. The reason
we need the condition that Λ > 10.54 is due to the fact that the τ obtained from [18], [19] and used in (5) is a sufficient
condition and may not be necessary.
9
Note that this condition can be relaxed by using the similar communication scheme base on ITLinQ [23].
10
If the condition gc M ≥ m is not satisfied, we can choose a larger transmission range such that this condition is feasible.
23
∆
where we define tc = gc M/m, or
RcRS (M ) =
τ 2γ
gc 2γ − 1
gc →∞
=
gcδ + o(gcδ ),
(33)
where tc = gc M/m, gc = Λz and τ , γ and δ are given in Theorem 3. As mentioned in Remark 1, a
straightforward achievable transmission policy consists of grouping the set of clusters into K spatial reuse
sets such that the clusters of the same reuse set do not interfere and can be activated simultaneously.11
In each active cluster, a single transmitter is active per time-slot and it is received by all nodes in
the cluster, as in classical time-frequency reuse schemes with reuse factor K that are currently used in
cellular networks [24, Ch. 17]. An example of a reuse set is shown in Fig. 1. In particular, we can pick
√
2
K=
2(1 + ∆) + 1 [21].
In [14], we observe that there is potentially no order gains as n → ∞ by using spatial reuse. The
benefit of spatial reuse is completely determined by the value of link rate Cr and reuse factor K. In
the newly proposed schemes, since the transmission rate in each cluster is a function of the number of
users, spatial reuse may achieve a higher gain in terms of throughput. Note that from the achievability
point of view, reducing the transmission range r is equivalent to reducing gc . We consider the use of the
hypercube and RS graph approaches separately as we investigate clustering in D2D caching networks.
A. Clustering with the Hypercube Caching Approach
The multiplicative gap between the transmission rate of Rchc and Rghc is given by
Ghc
R =
Rchc
gc t − 1
=
.
hc
n tc − 1
Rg
(34)
From (34), we can see that the transmission rate of each cluster decreases as gc decreases. Furthermore,
the achievable throughput of the hypercube approach with clustering is given by the following theorem.
Theorem 4: Let m, n, M be the library size, number of users and the cache size per user, respectively.
√
m
m
− 1 and M
, tc , c ∈ Z+ , the following per user throughput
For r ≤ 2, tc = gcmM ≥ 2, c(tc − 1) = M
Tchc (M ) is achievable:
Tchc (M ) =
with the requirement of K = Kchc =
11
m tc
.
M
Cr M t c − 1
K m − M tc
(35)
Note that the interference management in this paper is based on protocol model. However, similar scheme can be designed
for AWGN or fading channel model based on the condition that treating interference as noise is optimal (ITLinQ [23]).
24
Proof: By using (2), we can obtain
Tchc (M ) =
where Rchc (M ) is given by (32).
1
Cr M t c − 1
Cr
=
,
hc
K Rc (M )
K m − M tc
(36)
Using (6) and replacing t by tc , we get
Kchc =
m tc
M
(37)
The multiplicative gap of Tghc and Tchc throughput is given by
Ghc
T =
Cr
1
Cr n t c − 1
Tchc
= √
= √
C 2 K Ghc
C
Tghc
2 K gc t − 1
R
(38)
Remark 3: Note that the throughput has increased by using the clustering scheme compared to the
√
scheme for r ≥ 2 if Ghc
T > 1 or in other words
Cr
C√
2
K
>
gc t − 1
.
n tc − 1
(39)
This relationship can be further simplified if gc M m and clustering will improve the throughput if
Cr /K > C√2 . This provides a similar result to that was shown in [14]. The exact relationship between
link rate, Cr , and transmission range, r, depends on the physical channel model and wireless network
design. However, Cr may not decrease as r decreases. Hence, clustering has the potential to increase
throughput. In addition, from (37), clustering can also be used for the purpose of reducing the number
of file partitions as also shown in [14]. For a cluster with gc users, the number of file partitions is
m tc m gc M/m
=
,
(40)
Kchc =
M
M
and the ratio of the number of file partitions with and without clustering is
(n−gc )
Kghc m M
m
,
(41)
=
M
Kchc
√
where Kghc given in (6) is the number of file partitions when r ≥ 2 such that no clustering is used. As
the cluster size gc becomes smaller, an exponential decrease in the number of file partitions is observed.
25
B. Clustering with the RS Graph Caching Approach
In this section we first discuss the throughput of the RS graph coded caching approach with clustering.
We then consider two ways of reducing gc based on the construction in [18], [19] and study their impact
on throughput and cache size requirement. The RS graph scheme achieves the following throughput:
Theorem 5: Let m, n, M be the library size, number of users and the cache size per user, respectively.
√
For r < 2, K = (2γ − 1)gc , gc = Λz , where Λ is any positive integer such that z ≥ 2Λ, and
− 2Λ41ln Λ
M = 2mgc
, let tc =
gc M
m
∈ Z+ , the per user throughput is given by:
TcRS (M ) =
Cr gc 2γ − 1
.
K τ 2γ
(42)
We have the following corollary for the asymptotic regime.
√
−c δ exp(−c2 /8)
, where
Corollary 4: For r < 2, when gc → ∞, K = O gc2−δ , tc ≥ 2, and M = 2mgc 1
where δ =
gc M
m
∈ Z+ , the throughput is given by:
Cr −δ
Cr −δ
RS
Tc (M ) =
g +o
g
,
K c
K c
c1 , c2 are some positive constants, let tc =
2 ln 10.5
ln Λ .
(43)
Since the proofs of Theorem 5 and Corollary 4 are similar to that of Theorem 4 by using Theorem 1
and Corollary 2, the proofs are omitted due to space limitation.
0
1) Decreasing gc by reducing z 0 while keeping Λ the same: Let n = Λz and gc = Λz , where z 0 < z .
From (25) and (33), the multiplicative gap between the transmission rate of RcRS (M ) and RRS (M ) is
given by
GRS
=
R
RcRS (M )
gcδ + o(gcδ )
2(z 0 −z)
2(z 0 −z)
δ(z 0 −z)
δ(z 0 −z)
. (44)
=
=
10.5
+
o
10.5
=
Λ
+
o
Λ
RRS (M )
nδ + o(nδ )
From (44), we can observe that by clustering the D2D network, the transmission rate (traffic load) can
be reduced significantly. For example, if z − z 0 = 2, e.g., the network is partitioned into Λ2 clusters,
−4 < 10−4 . Nevertheless, due to the spatial reuse gain, by using Corollary 1 and 4, the
GRS
R = 10.5
multiplicative gap between TcRS (M ) and T RS (M ) is given by
GRS
T
=
(a)
=
Cr −δ
Cr −δ
TcRS (M )
K gc + o K gc
= √ −δ
T RS (M )
C 2 n + o C√2 n−δ
Cr 1
2(z−z 0 )
2(z−z 0 )
10.5
,
10.5
+
o
C√2 K
where (a) is obtained by repeating the same procedure as (44). From (45), we can see that if
(45)
Cr 1
C√2 K
and Λ
are positive constants, then by increasing z − z 0 , e.g., increasing the number of clusters, the multiplicative
26
RS
RS (M ) can grow to infinity, which means that the gain by using the
gap GRS
T between Tc (M ) and T
spatial reuse in D2D network can be infinite. In practice, even for finite z − z 0 , it is possible to achieve
gains by using spatial reuse. For example, if z − z 0 = 2, then from (45), we can see that
GRS
T =
Cr 1
10.54 ,
C√2 K
(46)
which can be much larger than 1. This surprising result demonstrates that spatial reuse provides significant
gain in throughput even when the reuse factor K is relatively large and there is little increase in the link
capacity from decreasing the transmission range.
As clustering is performed, the required cache capacity M increases. For this specific clustering scheme,
from Theorem 1 and Theorem 5, the following condition for cache capacity M (gc ) must hold
M (gc ) =
− 1
2mgc 2Λ4 ln Λ
− 2Λ41ln Λ
= 2mn
z − z0
= M (n) exp
.
2Λ4
− 2Λ41ln Λ
gc
1
n− 2Λ4 ln Λ
(47)
Note that by using (47), to achieve the promised throughput, it needs M (gc ) ≥ M (n) exp
example, if z − z 0 = 2, it requires M (n/Λ2 ) = M (n)e
1
Λ4
z−z 0
2Λ4
. For
. This demonstrates that if the network is
1
divided into Λ2 clusters, the lower bound of M increases by a factor of e Λ4 , which is insignificant for
reasonablely large values of Λ.
2) Decrease gc by reducing Λ while keeping z unchanged: Let n = Λz and gc = (Λ0 )z , where Λ0 < Λ.
From Corollary 2 and (32), the multiplicative gap between the transmission rate of RcRS (M ) and RRS (M )
is given by
0
GRS
R
0
2 ln 10.5
RRS (M )
g δ + o(gcδ )
(Λ0 ) ln Λ0 z
= cRS
= cδ
=
+o
2 ln 10.5
R (M )
n + o(nδ )
Λ ln Λ z
(Λ0 )
Λ
2 ln 10.5
ln Λ0
2 ln 10.5
ln Λ
z
!
z
= 1 + o (1) .
(48)
From (48), interestingly, we can see that in this case by clustering the D2D network, the transmission
rate is almost unchanged. It follows from Corollary 1 and 4 that the multiplicative gap between TcRS (M )
and T RS (M ) is given by
GRS
T
=
=
0
Cr −δ 0
+ o CKr gc−δ
TcRS (M )
K gc
= √ −δ
T RS (M )
C 2 n + o C√2 n−δ
!
Cr 1
Cr 1
+o
.
C√2 K
C√2 K
(49)
From (49), we can see that similar to [14], there is no fundamental cumulative gain by using both spatial
reuse and coded multicasting. Under our assumptions, spatial reuse may or may not be advantageous,
depending on whether
Cr
K
is larger or smaller than C√2 . In addition, this also depends on how the link
27
rate varies as a function of communication range. This aspect is not captured by the protocol model,
and the answer may depend on the operating frequency and appropriate channel model of the underlying
wireless network physical layer [20].
VI. C ONCLUSION
This work aims to find D2D coded caching network designs which require a more practical amount of
packetization as compared to the state-of-the-art coded D2D caching schemes in [14]. We propose two
new network design approaches, which are hypercube approach and Ruzsa-Szeméredi graph approach. In
particular, the hypercube approach has been designed specifically for D2D and not based off a shared link
scheme as that in [14]. The hypercube approach requires exponentially less packetization as compared
to coded caching scheme in [14] and yields nearly the same per user throughput for a large number of
users. The RS Graph approach was expanded from a previously studied shared link network design [19]
and modified for the design of D2D networks. It requires only subquadratic packetization in terms of the
number of users and achieves a near constant per user throughput. The dramatic decrease in packetization
resulted from the RS Graph approach comes at the cost of a significant increase in throughtput compared
to [14]. In addition, we demonstrate how the hypercube scheme can be expanded to design decentralized
networks and discovered a clear trade-off between transmission rate and packetization. Furthermore, we
explore how breaking up larger networks into smaller networks can utilize spatial reuse and increase
per user throughput. This work represents a major step forward towards practical file packetization in
D2D coded caching networks. Future work may yield other RS graph constructions with more general
packetization requirements and a trade-off between packetization and transmission rate.
A PPENDIX A
P ROOF OF THE C ORRECTNESS OF THE G ENERAL H YPERCUBE S CHEME
In this section, we demonstrate the correctness of the proposed scheme by verifying that all users:
1) locally cache at most M F bits; 2) only transmit content that is locally cached; 3) decode requested
packets from received coded multicasts; and 4) recover the entire requested file.
m t−1
For 1), each user caches a set of ( M
)
packets of size
F
(m/M )t
total number of bits cached locally at each user is
m t−1
F
·
t · m = M F
m
M
M
which satisfies the local memory constraint for each user.
bits for all m files in the library. The
(50)
28
For 2), for each packet, Wfus ,(a0 ,...,at−1 ) , included in a multicast from user ui , notice that ai = ui mod
m
M,
m
which follows from (3) and (4), and bui / M
c = i as defined for a user in a set S in the delivery
phase. This precisely matches the definition for a packet that user ui cached during the placement phase,
and therefore each user ui ∈ S is guaranteed to have the packets cached that it is about to transmit.
For 3), first notice that, for any user set, S , as defined in the delivery phase, a user uj ∈ S will receive
a requested packet from all users in S \ uj . To prove this consider any user ui ∈ S \ uj . Notice that
(j − i) mod
m
M
m
6= 0 because i 6= j and i, j ∈ {0, . . . , M
− 1}. Furthermore, by (3) and (4), the multicast
from user ui will include a packet Wfuj ,(a0 ,...,at−1 ) such that
aj = (uj + j − i) mod
m
m
6= uj mod
.
M
M
(51)
This precisely defines a packet which is part of user uj ’s request and is not included in user uj ’s cache.
Next, consider every other packet, Wfuk ,(a0 ,...,at−1 ) , included in a multicast from the user ui and notice
that aj = uj mod
m
M
which follows from (3) and (4) where k 6= i, j . This means user uj has these
packets cached and is able to decode the uncached, requested packet from the received multicast from
user ui .
For 4), first consider the following useful property
{(a + b) mod c : b ∈ {−x, . . . , c − 1 − x} \ 0} = {0, . . . , c − 1} \ a mod c
(52)
where x ∈ Z and 0 ≤ x ≤ c − 1. This property holds because {b mod c} = {1, . . . , c − 1}. Now consider
a user group, S , as defined by the delivery phase. By (3) and (4), user uj ∈ S will receive every packet,
Wfuj ,(a0 ,...,at−1 ) , such that aq equals some constant if q 6= j and
aj ∈ {(uj + j − i) mod
m
: i ∈ {0, ..., t − 1} \ j}.
M
(53)
Furthermore, recognizing that i − j ∈ {−j, ..., t − 1 − j} \ 0 and t = m/M demonstrates that
aj ∈ {0, . . . ,
m
m
− 1} \ aj mod
.
M
M
(54)
In other words, user uj collectively receives a “line” of packets from users S \ uj for which t − 1
dimensions of the “hypercube” are held constant and one dimension varies the length of the “hypercube”. The only exception is the packet which user uj already has cached. Moreover, the constants,
{a0 , . . . , at−1 } \ aj , are defined as aq = uq mod
m
M.
Therefore, for user uj to receive any packet,
Wfuj ,(a0 ,...,at−1 ) , not already cached, user uj can form a multicast group with the set of users
S 0 = {aq + q(
m
) : q ∈ {0, . . . , t − 1} \ j}
M
(55)
29
m
Given that, aq ∈ {0, . . . , M
− 1} for all q ∈ {0, ..., t − 1}, recognize that S 0 ∪ uj ⊂ U . Also, |S 0 ∪ uj | = t
m
m
c = k for all k ∈ {0, . . . , M
− 1}. Therefore, S 0 ∪ uj
and there exists a user uk ∈ S 0 ∪ uj such that buk / M
meets the requirements for a group, S , as defined by the delivery phase. This proves that by forming
all user sets as defined in the delivery phase, all users will recover all packets of the requested file that
were not already cached.
A PPENDIX B
P ROOF OF T HEOREM 1
To prove Theorem 1, we first introduce the following construction of RS Graph from [18], [19].
Definition 8: (Graph Construction) A graph, G(V, E), is defined such that V = [Λ]z where Λ ∈ Z+ ,
z is even, and z ≥ 2Λ. Let µ = Ex,y [||x − y||22 ], where x and y are sampled uniformly from V . For a
pair of vertices, u, v ∈ V , (u, v) ∈ V if and only if | ||u − v||22 − µ| ≤ z .
♦
Given this construction, the graph consists of τ = nf edge disjoint induced matchings and misses at
most nk edges such that f = 1 + 2 lnln10.5
Λ + o(1), and k = 2 −
1
2Λ4 ln Λ
+ o(1).
Furthermore, given a vertex, x ∈ V , the degree of x, defined as d, is bounded by [19]
1
d = |y ∈ V : (x, y) ∈ E| ≥ n 1 − 2n− 2Λ4 ln Λ .
(56)
The degree of any vertex defines the number of packets that a user does not cache. Therefore, if the
following holds,
1
dlb
M
≥1−
= 2n− 2Λ4 ln Λ ,
m
n
where dlb is the lower bound of d, then the graph construction can be used as a cache placement scheme.
1
+
Hence, we can pick M = 2mn− 2Λ4 ln Λ . Since d ≥ dlb = n 1 − M
m = n − t, we have t ∈ Z .
By the construction of the proposed scheme described in Section IV-C, each file is partitioned into
n(2γ − 1) packets, and each contains F/K bits. Moreover, for each disjoint matching in the constructed
RS graph, there are 2γ transmissions, and each has size
F
n(2γ−1)
bits. Since the number of disjoint
matching is τ , there are 2γ · τ transmissions.
R(M ) = 2γ · τ ·
Hence, we finish the proof.
F
1
τ 2γ
·
=
.
n(2γ − 1) F
n 2γ − 1
(57)
30
R EFERENCES
[1] M. A. Maddah-Ali and U. Niesen, “Fundamental limits of caching,” Information Theory, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 60,
no. 5, pp. 2856–2867, 2014.
[2] E. Bastug, M. Bennis, and M. Debbah, “Living on the edge: The role of proactive caching in 5g wireless networks,”
Communications Magazine, IEEE, vol. 52, no. 8, pp. 82–89, 2014.
[3] G. Paschos, E. Bastug, I. Land, G. Caire, and M. Debbah, “Wireless caching: technical misconceptions and business
barriers,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 54, no. 8, pp. 16–22, August 2016.
[4] D. Liu, B. Chen, C. Yang, and A. F. Molisch, “Caching at the wireless edge: design aspects, challenges, and future
directions,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 54, no. 9, pp. 22–28, September 2016.
[5] K. Shanmugam, M. Ji, A. M. Tulino, J. Llorca, and A. G. Dimakis, “Finite length analysis of caching-aided coded
multicasting,” in Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton), 2014 52nd Annual Allerton Conference on. IEEE,
2014, pp. 914–920.
[6] K. Wan, D. Tuninetti, and P. Piantanida, “On caching with more users than files,” in 2016 IEEE International Symposium
on Information Theory (ISIT), July 2016, pp. 135–139.
[7] K. Wan, D. Tuninetti, and P. Piantanida, “On the optimality of uncoded cache placement,” in 2016 IEEE Information
Theory Workshop (ITW), Sept 2016, pp. 161–165.
[8] Q. Yu, M. A. Maddah-Ali, and A. S. Avestimehr, “Characterizing the rate-memory tradeoff in cache networks within a
factor of 2,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.04563, 2017.
[9] N. Karamchandani, U. Niesen, M. A. Maddah-Ali, and S. Diggavi, “Hierarchical coded caching,” IEEE Transactions on
Information Theory, vol. PP, no. 99, pp. 1–1, 2016.
[10] A. Sengupta and R. Tandon, “Improved approximation of storage-rate tradeoff for caching with multiple demands,” IEEE
Transactions on Communications, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 1940–1955, May 2017.
[11] S. W. Jeon, S. N. Hong, M. Ji, G. Caire, and A. F. Molisch, “Wireless multihop device-to-device caching networks,” IEEE
Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 1662–1676, March 2017.
[12] A. Liu, V. Lau, and G. Caire, “Cache-induced hierarchical cooperation in wireless device-to-device caching networks,”
arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.07417, 2016.
[13] S. P. Shariatpanahi, G. Caire, and B. H. Khalaj, “Physical-layer schemes for wireless coded caching,” arXiv preprint
arXiv:1711.05969, 2017.
[14] M. Ji, G. Caire, and A. F. Molisch, “Fundamental limits of caching in wireless d2d networks,” IEEE Transactions on
Information Theory, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 849–869, Feb 2016.
[15] Y. Fadlallah, A. M. Tulino, D. Barone, G. Vettigli, J. Llorca, and J.-M. Gorce, “Coding for caching in 5g networks,” IEEE
Communications Magazine, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 106–113, 2017.
[16] S. Jin, Y. Cui, H. Liu, and G. Caire, “New order-optimal decentralized coded caching schemes with good performance in
the finite file size regime,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1604.07648, 2016.
[17] I. Ruzsa and E. Szemerédi, “Triple systems with no six points carrying three triangles,” Combinatorics (Keszthely, 1976),
Coll. Math. Soc. J. Bolyai, vol. 18, pp. 939–945, 1978.
[18] N. Alon, A. Moitra, and B. Sudakov, “Nearly complete graphs decomposable into large induced matchings and their
applications,” in Proceedings of the 44th annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing. ACM, 2012, pp. 1079–1090.
[19] K. Shanmugam, A. M. Tulino, and A. G. Dimakis, “Coded caching with linear subpacketization is possible using ruzsaszeméredi graphs,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.07115, 2017.
31
[20] M. Ji, G. Caire, and A. F. Molisch, “Wireless device-to-device caching networks: Basic principles and system performance,”
IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 176–189, Jan 2016.
[21] F. Xue and PR Kumar, Scaling laws for ad hoc wireless networks: an information theoretic approach, Now Pub, 2006.
[22] M. Raab and A. Steger, “‘balls into bin’–a simple and tight analysis,” Randomization and Approximation Techniques in
Computer Science, pp. 159–170, 1998.
[23] N. Naderializadeh, D. T. H. Kao, and A. S. Avestimehr, “How to utilize caching to improve spectral efficiency in deviceto-device wireless networks,” in 2014 52nd Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing
(Allerton), Sept 2014, pp. 415–422.
[24] A.F. Molisch, Wireless communications, 2nd edition, IEEE Press - Wiley, 2011.
| 7cs.IT
|
arXiv:1711.10301v1 [cs.PL] 28 Nov 2017
The Maximal MAM,
a Reasonable Implementation of
the Maximal Strategy
Beniamino Accattoli
INRIA, UMR 7161, LIX, École Polytechnique, France
1
Introduction
This note is about a reasonable abstract machine, called Maximal MAM, implementing the maximal strategy of the λ-calculus, that is, the strategy that always
produces a longest evaluation sequence. The abstract machine is a minor variation over the Useful MAM of [Acc16], that is a reasonable implementation of
the leftmost-outermost strategy. Here reasonable is a technical term: an abstract machine M implementing a strategy → is reasonable when its overhead
on a given term t is polynomial with respect to the size of t and the number of
→-steps necessary to evaluate t.
The result of this note is discussed and put in context in the author’s
(In)Efficiency and Reasonable Cost Models [Acc17]. Essentially, the maximal
strategy is a peculiar case-study, for the following reasons:
• Non-trivial reasonable implementation: it is the most inefficient strategy
ever, and yet implementing it with a reasonable overhead requires the
whole heavy machinery, namely useful sharing, needed for the leftmostoutermost strategy, the other only strong strategy known to be reasonable.
• Unreasonable cost model : it is reasonably implementable—that usually is
the tricky part in the study of cost models—but its number of steps does
not provide a reasonable cost model. Indeed the strategy is so inefficient
that it cannot even simulate Turing machines, that usually is the easy part
in the study of cost models. To be precise, there are no proofs of such
impossibility, but the known encodings of Turing machines do not work
when the evaluation strategy in the λ-calculus is the maximal one.
We first define the strategy, and then show how to implement it via the Max
MAM. The technical details follow closely those in [Acc16] for the Useful MAM.
In turn, the Useful MAM is a refinement of the Strong MAM, an unreasonable
abstract machine for the leftmost-outermost strategy studied in [ABM15], that
in turn is a simplification of Cregut’s machine [Cré90, Cré07, GNM13]. The
literature about abstract machines for strong evaluation is extremely limited,
we essentially already cited all existing papers on the subject. A few further
papers [GL02, AC15, AG17] deal with abstract machines for weak evaluation
1
with open terms, that is an intermediate framework between the one of weak
evaluation with closed terms, to which the almost totality of the literature is
devoted, and the almost inexistent one of strong evaluation.
2
λ-Calculus and Maximal Evaluation
The syntax of the ordinary λ-calculus is given by the following grammar for
terms:
λ-Terms
t, u, r, s ::= x | λx.t | tu.
We use t{x u} for the usual (meta-level) notion of substitution. An abstraction
λx.t binds x in t, and we silently work modulo α-equivalence of bound variables,
e.g. (λy.(xy)){x y} = λz.(yz). We use fv(t) for the set of free variables of t.
β-reduction. We define β-reduction →β as follows:
Contexts
C ::= h·i | λx.C | Ct | tC
Rule at top level
(λx.t)u 7→β t{x u}
Contextual closure
Chti →β Chui if t 7→β u
A context C is applicative if C = Dhh·iui for some D and u. A term t is a normal
form, or simply normal, if there is no u such that t →β u, and it is neutral if
it is normal and it is not of the form λx.u (i.e. it is not an abstraction). The
position of a β-redex Chti →β Chui is the context C in which it takes place.
To ease the language, we will identify a redex with its position. A derivation
d : t →k u is a finite, possibly empty, sequence of reduction steps. We write |t|
for the size of t and |d| for the length of d.
Maximal Evaluation. The maximal strategy is the variation over leftmostoutermost (LO) evaluation in which, when the LO redex (λx.t)u is erasing (that
is, when x ∈
/ fv(t)), the strategy first evaluates (maximally) u to u′ , and then
fires the erasing redex (λx.t)u′ →β t, to avoid the erasure of the β-redexes of
u before being reduced. Of course, if u diverges than the maximal strategy
diverges, while the LO strategy would not (or, at least, not because of u). The
LO strategy is inefficient but it has the key property of being normalizing, i.e.
it reaches a normal form whenever it exists. The maximal strategy, dually, is
perpetual, that is, it diverges whenever possible. See van Raamsdonk at al.’s
[vRSSX99] for more about perpetual and maximal strategies.
We define the maximal strategy by first defining the notion of maximal
context, that is a context in which a maximal redex can appear (and not a
context that cannot be extended).
Definition 2.1 (Max Context). Maximal (or max) contexts are defined by induction as follows:
2
h·i is Max
(ax)
C is Max (λ)
λx.C is Max
C is Max
C 6= λx.D
(@l)
Ct is Max
x∈
/ fv(t)
C is Max
(gc)
(λx.t)C is Max
t is neutral
C is Max (@r)
tC is Max
We define the maximal β-reduction strategy →Maxβ as follows:
Rule at top level
(λx.t)u 7→Maxβ t{x u} if x ∈ fv(t) or u is normal
Contextual closure
Chti →Maxβ Chui if t 7→Maxβ u
As expected,
Lemma 2.2 (Basic Properties of the Maximal Strategy, Proof at page 13). Let
t be a λ-term that is not normal. Then
1. Completeness: there exists u such that t →Maxβ u.
2. Determinism: moreover, such a u is unique.
Let us point out that we talk about the maximal strategy despite the fact
that there are many maximal strategies, that can be obtained from our definition
by adding some more freedom in the choice of the redex. A typical example is
given by xtu: our strategy first reduces t and then (if t terminates) it evaluates u,
while one can interleave the evaluations of t and u and still be maximal (because
t cannot act on u in xtu). We refer it as the maximal strategy, because it is
the leftmost maximal strategy, i.e. it mostly behaves as the leftmost strategy,
it only changes its behavior on erasing redexes (and the leftmost strategy is a
sort of canonical strategy).
3
Preliminaries on Abstract Machines
We study two abstract machines, the Maximal Milner Abstract Machine (Max
MAM) (Fig. 4) and an auxiliary machine called the Checking AM (Fig. 2). The
Max MAM is a reasonable implementation of the maximal strategy resting on
labeled environments to implement useful sharing, and on the Checking AM to
produce these labels.
The Max MAM is meant to implement the maximal strategy via a decoding
function · mapping machine states to λ-terms. Machine states s are given by
a code t, that is a λ-term t not considered up to α-equivalence (which is why it
is over-lined), and some data-structures like stacks, frames, and environments.
The data-structures are used to implement the search for the next maximal
redex and a form of micro-steps substitution, and they decode to evaluation
contexts for →Maxβ . Every state s decodes to a term s, having the shape Cs hti,
where t is the code currently under evaluation and Cs is the evaluation context
given by the data-structures.
The Checking AM uses the same states and data-structures of the Max
MAM.
3
The Data-Structures. First of all, our machines are executed on wellnamed terms, that are those α-representants where all variables (both bound
and free) have distinct names. Then, the data-structures used by the machines
are defined in Fig. 1, namely:
1. Stack π: it contains the arguments of the current code;
2. Frame F : a second stack, that together with π is used to walk through the
term and search for the next redex to reduce. The items φ of a frame are of
three kinds:
1. Variables: a variable x is pushed on the frame F whenever the machines
starts evaluating under an abstraction λx.
2. Head argument contexts: t♦π is pushed on F every time evaluation enters
in the right subterm u of an application tu. The entry saves the left part
t of the application and the current stack π, to restore them when the
evaluation of the right subterm u is over.
3. Erasing Contexts: λx.tπ is pushed on F every time evaluation finds
an erasing redex (λx.t)u (that is, a redex for which x ∈
/ fv(t)). In this
case evaluation enters in the argument u to normalize it (or, possibly, to
diverge) before erasing it.
4. Global Environment E: it is used to implement micro-step substitution (i.e.
on a variable occurrence at the time), storing the arguments of β-redexes that
have been encountered so far. Most of the literature on abstract machines
uses local environments and closures. Having just one global environment
E (used only in a minority of works [FS09, SGM02, DZ13, ABM14, AC15,
ABM15, Acc16, AG17], and discussed at length in [AB17]) removes the need
for closures and simplifies the machine. On the other hand, it forces to use
α
explicit α-renamings (the operation t in ered and eabs in Fig. 4), but
this does not affect the overall complexity, as it speeds up other operations,
see [AB17]. The entries of E are of the form [x t]l , i.e. they carry a label
l used to implement usefulness, to be explained later on in this section. We
write E(x) = [x t]l when E contains [x t]l and E(x) = ⊥ when in E there
are no entries of the form [x t]l .
→→
The Decoding. Every state s decodes to a term s (see Fig. 3) of shape
Cs ht E i, where
1. t E is a λ-term, roughly obtained by applying to the code the substitution
induced by the global environment E. More precisely, the operation t E is
called unfolding and it is properly defined at the end of this section.
2. Cs is a context, that will be shown to be a max context, obtained by decoding
the stack π and the dump D and applying the unfolding. Note that, to
improve readability, π is decoded in postfix notation for plugging.
→
The Transitions. According to the distillation approach of [ABM14] (related to Danvy and Nielsen’s refocusing [DN04]) we distinguish different kinds
of transitions, whose names reflect a proof-theoretical view, as transitions can
be seen as cut-elimination steps [ABS09, ABM14]:
1. Multiplicatives m : they correspond to the firing of a β-redex (λx.t)u, except that if the argument u is not a variable and the redex is not erasing
(that happens when x ∈ fv(t)) then u is not substituted but added to the
environment;
2. Exponentials
e : they perform a clashing-avoiding substitution from the
4
✓
Frames
Frame Items
Labels
✒
F
φ
l
::=
::=
::=
ǫ | F :: φ
x | t♦π | λx.tπ
abs | (red, n ∈ N) | neu
Stacks
π ::=
Phases
ϕ ::=
Environments E ::=
Figure 1: Grammars.
→
environment on the single variable occurrence represented by the current
code. They implement micro-step substitution.
3. Commutatives c : they locate and expose the next redex according to the
maximal strategy, by rearranging the data-structures.
Both exponential and commutative transitions are invisible on the λ-calculus.
Garbage collection of environment entries that are no longer necessary is here
simply ignored, or, more precisely, it is encapsulated at the meta-level, in the
decoding function.
Labels for Useful Sharing A label l for a code in the environment can be
of three kinds. Roughly, they are:
1. Neutral, or l = neu: it marks a neutral term, that is always useless as it
is β-normal and its substitution cannot create a redex, because it is not an
abstraction;
2. Abstraction, or l = abs: it marks an abstraction, that is a term that is
at times useful to substitute. If the variable that it is meant to replace is
applied, indeed, the substitution of the abstraction creates a β-redex. But
if it is not applied, it is useless.
3. Redex, or l = red: it marks a term that contains a β-redex. It is always
useful to substitute these terms.
Actually, the explanation we just gave is oversimplified, but it provides a first
intuition about labels. In fact in an environment [x t]l :: E it is not really
t that has the property mentioned by its label, rather the term t E obtained
by unfolding the rest of the environment on t. The idea is that [x t]red states
that it is useful to substitute t to later on obtain a redex inside it (by potential
further substitutions on its variables coming from E). The precise meaning of
the labels will be given by Definition 4.2, and the properties they encode will
be made explicit by Lemma 6.11 in the Appendix (page 31).
A further subtlety is that the label red for redexes is refined as a pair (red, n),
where n is the number of substitutions in E that are needed to obtain the
maximal redex in t E . Our machines never inspect these numbers, they are
only used for the complexity analysis of Sect. 6.
→
Grafting and Unfoldings The unfolding of the environment E on a code t
is defined as the recursive capture-allowing substitution (called grafting) of the
entries of E on t. For lack of space, the precise definition has been moved to
the Appendix (page 13).
4
The Checking Abstract Machine
The Checking Abstract Machine (Checking AM) is defined in Fig. 2 and it is a
variation over the very similar auxiliary checking machine for the Useful MAM
in [Acc16]. The difference between the two is in the two new transitions ⇀c7
5
ǫ | t :: π
H|N
ǫ | [x t]l :: E
✏
✑
✬
Frame
F
F
Code
tu
λx.t
Stack Env
π
E
u :: π
E
Ph
H ⇀Hc1
H ⇀o1
Frame
Code
t
F
output (red, 1)
F
λx.t
u :: π
H
F :: λx.tπ
F
F
λx.t
x
F
x
F
x
F :: x
F :: t♦π
F :: λx.tπ
F
ǫ
ǫ
t
u
u
t
tu
λx.t
F :: x
t
ǫ
output (red, n + 1)
if E(x) = [x t](red,n)
u :: π
E
H ⇀o3
output (red, 2)
if E(x) = [x t]abs
π
E
H ⇀Hc3
x
π
E
N
F
if E(x) = ⊥ or E(x) = [x t]neu or (E(x) = [x t]abs and π = ǫ)
F
ǫ
E
N ⇀Nc4
λx.t
ǫ
E
N
F
ǫ
E
N ⇀Nc5
tu
π
E
N
ǫ
E
N ⇀o6
output (red, 1)
u :: π
E
N ⇀Nc6
u
ǫ
E
H
F :: t♦π
ǫ
E
N ⇀o4
output neu
ǫ
E
N ⇀o5
output abs
✫
E
E
Hc7
u
⇀Hc2
⇀o2
H
H
ǫ
Figure 2: The Checking Abstract Machine (Checking AM).
h·i
πhh·iui
Dhπhth·iii
Dhπh(λx.t)h·iii
F :: x := Dhλx.h·ii
Cs := Dhπi E
s := Dhπhtii E = Cs ht
where s = (F, t, π, E)
Ei
Figure 3: Decoding.
and ⇀o6 (that is also why in Fig. 2 they are misplaced with respect to the
progressing numbering), plus the side condition if x ∈ fv(t) in ⇀o1 .
The Checking AM starts executions on states of the form (ǫ, t, ǫ, E, H), with
the aim of checking the usefulness of t with respect to the environment E, i.e. it
walks through t and whenever it encounters a variable x it looks up its usefulness
in E.
The Checking AM has seven commutative transitions, noted ⇀ci with i =
1, .., 7, used to walk through the term, and six output transitions, noted ⇀oj
with j = 1, .., 6, that produce the value of the test for usefulness, to be later used
by the Max MAM. The exploration is done in two alternating phases, evaluation
H and backtracking N. Evaluation explores the current code (morally towards
the head, except when it encounters an erasing redex, that is when it first
explores the right subterm) storing in the stack and in the frame the parts of
the code that it leaves behind. Backtracking comes back to an argument that
was stored in the frame, when the current head has already been checked. Note
that the Checking AM never modifies the environment, it only looks it up, nor it
erases or duplicates any piece of code, it only walks through the data structures.
Let us explain the transitions. First the commutative ones:
• ⇀Hc1 : the code is an application tu and the machine starts exploring the
left subterm t, storing u on top of the stack π.
6
✩
✪
✘
→
:=
:=
:=
:=
→
ǫ
u :: π
F :: t♦π
F :: λx.tπ
✚
Ph
H
if x ∈ fv(t)
E
H
if x ∈
/ fv(t)
E
H
→
✛
ǫ
π
E
Stack Env
u :: π
E
✙
• ⇀Hc7 : the code λx.t and the first argument u on the stack form an erasing
redex (by hypothesis x ∈
/ fv(t)). The machine has found a β-redex but it
cannot output yet, because it does not know what number n to associate
to the label l = (red, n). Indeed, (λx.t)u is the next β-redex to reduce
only if u is normal, otherwise the next one will be in u and obtaining it
may require many substitution steps. Therefore, the machine stores λx.t
and the current stack π on the frame F and starts checking u (with an
empty stack).
• ⇀Hc2 : the code is an abstraction λx.t and the machine goes under the
abstraction, storing x on top of the frame F .
• ⇀Hc3 : the machine finds a variable x that either has no associated entry
in the environment (if E(x) = ⊥) or its associated entry [x t]l in the
environment is useless. This can happen if either l = neu, i.e. substituting
t would only lead to a neutral term, or l = abs, i.e. substituting t would
provide an abstraction, but the stack is empty, and so it is useless to
substitute the abstraction because no β-redexes will be obtained. Thus
the machine switches to the backtracking phase (N), whose aim is to undo
the frame to obtain a new subterm to explore.
• ⇀Nc4 : it is the inverse of ⇀Hc2 , it puts back on the code an abstraction
that was previously stored in the frame.
• ⇀Nc5 : backtracking from the evaluation of an argument u, it restores the
application tu and the stack π that were previously stored in the frame.
• ⇀Nc6 : backtracking from the evaluation of the left subterm t of an application tu, the machine starts evaluating the right subterm (by switching
to the evaluation phase H) with an empty stack ǫ, storing on the frame
the pair t♦π of the left subterm and the previous stack π.
Then the output transitions:
• ⇀o1 : the machine finds a non-erasing β-redex, namely (λx.t)u (by hypothesis x ∈ fv(t), and thus outputs a label saying that it requires only one
substitution step (namely substituting the term the machine was executed
on) to eventually find a β-redex.
• ⇀o2 : the machine finds a variable x whose associated entry [x t](red,n)
in the environment is labeled with (red, n), and so outputs a label saying
that it takes n + 1 substitution steps to eventually find a β-redex (n plus
1 for the term the machine was executed on).
• ⇀o3 : the machine finds a variable x whose associated entry [x t]abs in
the environment is labeled with abs, so t is an abstraction, and the stack
is non-empty. Since substituting the abstraction will create a β-redex,
the machine outputs a label saying that it takes two substitution steps to
obtain a β-redex, one for the term the machine was executed on and one
for the abstraction t.
• ⇀o6 : the machine went through the whole code u and found no redexes.
Then u is normal and together with the erasing abstraction λx.t in the
7
frame it forms an erasing redex ready to fire, and so the output is a label
saying that it requires only one substitution step (namely substituting the
term the machine was executed on) to eventually find a β-redex.
• ⇀o4 : the machine went through the whole term, that is an application,
and found no redex, nor any redex that can be obtained by substituting
from the environment. Thus that term is neutral and so the machine
outputs the corresponding label.
• ⇀o5 : as for the previous transition, except that the term is an abstraction,
and so the output is the abs label.
The fact that commutative transitions only walk through the code, without
changing anything, is formalized by the following lemma, that is crucial for the
proof of correctness of the Checking AM (forthcoming Theorem 4.3).
Lemma 4.1 (Commutative Transparency, Proof at P. 14). Let s = (F, t, π, E, ϕ)
′
(F ′ , t , π ′ , E, ϕ′ ) = s′ . Then
′
1. Decoding Without Unfolding: F hhtiπi = F ′ hht iπ ′ i, and
2. Decoding With Unfolding: s = s′ .
For the analysis of the properties of the Checking AM we need a notion of
well-labeled environment, i.e. of environment where the labels are consistent
with their intended meaning. It is a technical notion also providing enough
information to perform the complexity analysis, later on. Moreover, it includes
two structural properties of environments: 1) in [x t]l the code t cannot be a
variable, and 2) there cannot be two entries associated to the same variables.
Definition 4.2 (Well-Labeled Environments). Well-labeled environments E
are defined by
1. Empty: ǫ is well-labeled;
2. Inductive: [x t]l :: E ′ is well-labeled if E ′ is well-labeled, x is fresh with
respect to t and E ′ , and
→
(a) Abstractions: if l = abs then t and t
E′
are normal abstractions;
→ →
(b) Neutral Terms: if l = neu then t is an application and t
E′
is neutral.
(c) Redexes: if l = (red, n) then t is not a variable, t E ′ contains a
β-redex. Moreover, there is a Max-context C such that t = Chui and
• if n = 1 then u is a 7→Maxβ -redex,
• if n > 1 then u = x and E ′ = E ′′ :: [y u]l :: E ′′′ with
– if n > 2 then l = (red, n − 1)
– if n = 2 then l = (red, 1) or (l = abs and C is applicative).
The study of the Checking AM requires some technical invariants proved in
the appendix (page 15). The next theorem provides the main properties of the
Checking AM, i.e. that when executed on t and E it provides a label l to extend
E with a consistent entry for t (i.e. such that [x t]l :: E is well-labeled), and
that such an execution takes time linear in the size of t.
8
c1,2,3,4,5,6,7
Let us explain an important point about the complexity of the machine transition. Variables are meant to be implemented as memory locations and variable
occurrences as pointers to those location. Therefore, the global environment E
is a store and can be accessed randomly, that is, with no need to go through it
sequentially. With this hypothesis on the representation of terms, see [AB17]
for an actual implementation, all the transitions of the Checking AM but ⇀Hc7
/ fv(t) in ⇀Hc7
and ⇀o1 can be implemented in constant time. The check x ∈ / ∈
and ⇀o1 at first sight requires time proportional to the size of the initial term,
but in fact it can be implemented in O(1) if one assumes a stronger hypothesis
on the representation of terms: a variable is a data-type with a memory location plus pointers to its occurrences. Then all transitions can be implemented
in O(1). Anyway, this hypothesis is not essential for the implementation to be
reasonable. If dropped, the subterm property (Lemma 6.9.1) guarantees that
the size of terms does not explode and that the check x ∈ / ∈
/ fv(t) can be
done in reasonable time. The hypothesis, however, simplifies considerably the
analysis.
Theorem 4.3 (Checking AM Properties, Proof at Page 18). Let t be a code
and E a global environment.
1. Determinism and Progress: the Checking AM is deterministic and there
always is a transition that applies;
2. Termination and Complexity: the execution of the Checking AM on t and
E always terminates, taking O(|t|) steps, moreover
3. Correctness: if E is well-labeled, x is fresh with respect to E and t, and l
is the output then [x t]l :: E is well-labeled.
5
The Maximal Milner Abstract Machine
The Maximal Milner Abstract Machine, or Max MAM, is defined in Fig. 4 and it
is a small variation over the Useful MAM of [Acc16] (as for the Checking AM, the
difference is in the two new transitions, Hc7 and m3 , plus the side condition
if x ∈ fv(t) in m2 ). It is very similar to the Checking AM, in particular
it has exactly the same commutative transitions, and the same organization in
evaluating and backtracking phases. The difference with respect to the Checking
AM is that the output transitions are replaced by micro-step computational
rules that reduce β-redexes and implement useful substitutions. Let us explain
them:
• Multiplicative Transition m1 : when the argument of the β-redex (λx.t)y is
a variable y then it is immediately substituted in t. This happens because
1) such substitution are not costly (by the subterm invariant, Lemma 6.9 in
the Appendix, their cost is bound by the size of t that is bound by the size
of the initial term); 2) because in this way the environment stays compact;
3) because in this way the labels for useful sharing are slightly simpler.
• Multiplicative Transition m2 : since the argument u is not a variable and
the redex is not erasing (x ∈ fv(t) by hypothesis) then the redex is fired by
adding the entry [x u]l to the environment, with l obtained by running the
Checking AM on u and E.
9
✬
Frame
Code Stack Env
F
tu
π
E
F
λx.t y :: π
E
F
λx.t u :: π
E
if x ∈ fv(t) and u is not a
F
λx.t u :: π
E
F
F
λx.t
x
ǫ
π
E
E
F
x
u :: π
E
F
x
π
E
F :: x
F :: t♦π
F :: λx.tπ
F
t
u
u
t
ǫ
ǫ
ǫ
u :: π
E
E
E
E
if
✫
α
t
Ph
Frame
Code Stack
Env
Ph
F
H
t
u :: π
E
H
Hc1
H
t{x y}
π
E
H
F
m1
H
t
π
[x u]l :: E H
F
m2
variable and l is the output of the Checking AM on u and E
F :: λx.tπ
H
u
ǫ
E
H
Hc7
if x ∈
/ fv(t) and u is not a variable
F :: x
H
t
ǫ
E
H
Hc2
α
H
F
t
π
E
H
ered
if E(x) = [x t](red,n)
α
H
F
t
u :: π
E
H
eabs
if E(x) = [x t]abs
H
x
π
E
N
F
Hc3
E(x) = ⊥ or E(x) = [x t]neu or (E(x) = [x t]abs and π = ǫ)
N
λx.t
ǫ
E
N
F
Nc4
N
tu
π
E
N
F
Nc5
N
t
π
E
H
F
m3
F :: t♦π
N
u
ǫ
E
H
Nc6
is any code α-equivalent to t such that it is well-named and its bound names are fresh with
respect to those in the other machine components.
Figure 4: The Maximum (Useful) Milner Abstract Machine (Max MAM).
• Multiplicative Transition m3 : an invariant of the machine is that when it
backtracks (phase N) the code is normal (see Lemma 6.6.2a in the Appendix,
page 20). Moreover, every abstraction λx.t in an erasing redex entry λx.tπ
in the frame is such that x ∈
/ fv(t) (Lemma 6.6.4). Then in m3 the code u
is normal and together with λx.t it forms an erasing 7→Maxβ redex. Correctly,
the machine throws away u and switches to evaluating t (note the change of
phase from N to H).
• Exponential Transition ered : the environment entry associated to x is labeled with (red, n) thus it is useful to substitute t. The idea is that in at
most n additional substitution steps (shuffled with commutative steps) a βredex will be obtained. To avoid variable clashes the substitution α-renames
t.
• Exponential Transition eabs : the environment associates an abstraction to
x and the stack is non empty, so it is useful to substitute the abstraction
(again, α-renaming to avoid variable clashes). Note that if the stack is empty
the machine rather backtracks using Hc3 .
The Max MAM starts executions on initial states of the form (ǫ, t, ǫ, ǫ, H),
where t is such that any two variables (bound or free) have distinct names, and
any other component is empty. A state s is reachable if there are an initial state
s′ and a Max MAM execution ρ : s′ ∗ s, and it is final if no transitions apply.
The theorem of correctness and completeness of the machine with respect
to →Maxβ follows. It rests on a technical development that is in the appendix,
starting at page 20. The bisimulation is weak because transitions other than m
are invisible on the λ-calculus. For a machine execution ρ we denote with |ρ|
(resp. |ρ|x ) the number of transitions (resp. x-transitions for x ∈ {m, e, c, . . .})
in ρ.
10
✩
✪
Theorem 5.1 (Weak Bisimulation, Proof at Page 25). Let s be an initial Max
MAM state of code t.
1. Simulation: for every execution ρ : s
d : s →∗Maxβ s′ such that |d| = |ρ|m ;
∗
s′ there exists a derivation
2. Reverse Simulation: for every derivation d : t →∗Maxβ u there is an execution ρ : s ∗ s′ such that s′ = u and |d| = |ρ|m .
6
Quantitative Analysis
The complexity analysis of the Max MAM is omitted because it follows exactly,
by changing only minimal details, the one for the Useful MAM in [Acc16]. All
the details can be found in the Appendix, starting from page 25.
Let us anyway provide the schema of the analysis. First of all one proves a
subterm invariant, proving that most codes in the state of the Max MAM are
subcodes of the initial code. Then the proof of the polynomial bound of the
overhead is in three steps.
1. Exponential vs Multiplicative Transitions: we bound the number |ρ|e of exponential transitions of an execution ρ using the number |ρ|m of multiplicative
transitions of ρ, that by Theorem 5.1 corresponds to the number of maximal
β-steps on the λ-calculus. The bound is quadratic.
2. Commutative vs Exponential Transitions: we bound the number |ρ|c of commutative transitions of ρ by using the number of exponential transitions and
the size of the initial term. The bound is linear in both quantities.
3. Global bound : we multiply the number of each kind of transition for the cost
of that kind (everything is constant time but for exponential transitions,
that are linear in the size of the initial term), and then sum over the kind of
transitions.
Concretely, one obtains the following theorem.
Theorem 6.1 (Max MAM Overhead Bound, Proof at Page 34). Let d : t →∗Maxβ
u be a maximal derivation and ρ be the Max MAM execution simulating d given
by Theorem 5.1.2. Then:
1. Length: |ρ| = O((1 + |d|2 ) · |t|).
2. Cost: ρ is implementable on RAM in O((1 + |d|2 ) · |t|) steps.
References
[AB17]
Beniamino Accattoli and Bruno Barras. Environments and the complexity of abstract machines. In PPDP 2017, pages 4–16, 2017.
[ABM14]
Beniamino Accattoli, Pablo Barenbaum, and Damiano Mazza. Distilling abstract machines. In ICFP 2014, pages 363–376, 2014.
[ABM15]
Beniamino Accattoli, Pablo Barenbaum, and Damiano Mazza. A
strong distillery. In APLAS 2015, pages 231–250, 2015.
11
[ABS09]
Zena M. Ariola, Aaron Bohannon, and Amr Sabry. Sequent calculi
and abstract machines. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst., 31(4),
2009.
[AC15]
Beniamino Accattoli and Claudio Sacerdoti Coen. On the relative
usefulness of fireballs. In LICS 2015, pages 141–155, 2015.
[Acc16]
Beniamino Accattoli. The Useful MAM, a Reasonable Implementation of the Strong λ-Calculus. In WoLLIC 2016, pages 1–21, 2016.
[Acc17]
Beniamino Accattoli. (In)Efficiency and Reasonable Cost Models.
In LSFA 2017, 2017.
[AG17]
Beniamino Accattoli and Giulio Guerrieri. Implementing open callby-value. In FSEN 2017, Tehran, Iran, April 26-28, 2017, Revised
Selected Papers, pages 1–19, 2017.
[AL16]
Beniamino Accattoli and Ugo Dal Lago. (Leftmost-Outermost)
Beta-Reduction is Invariant, Indeed. LMCS, 12(1), 2016.
[Cré90]
Pierre Crégut. An abstract machine for lambda-terms normalization. In LISP and Functional Programming, pages 333–340, 1990.
[Cré07]
Pierre Crégut. Strongly reducing variants of the Krivine abstract
machine. Higher-Order and Symbolic Computation, 20(3):209–230,
2007.
[DN04]
Olivier Danvy and Lasse R. Nielsen. Refocusing in reduction semantics. Technical Report RS-04-26, BRICS, 2004.
[DZ13]
Olivier Danvy and Ian Zerny. A synthetic operational account of
call-by-need evaluation. In PPDP, pages 97–108, 2013.
[FGSW07] Daniel P. Friedman, Abdulaziz Ghuloum, Jeremy G. Siek, and Onnie Lynn Winebarger. Improving the lazy Krivine machine. HigherOrder and Symbolic Computation, 20(3):271–293, 2007.
[FS09]
Maribel Fernández and Nikolaos Siafakas. New developments in
environment machines. Electr. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci., 237:57–
73, 2009.
[GL02]
Benjamin Grégoire and Xavier Leroy. A compiled implementation
of strong reduction. In (ICFP ’02)., pages 235–246, 2002.
[GNM13]
Álvaro Garcı́a-Pérez, Pablo Nogueira, and Juan José MorenoNavarro. Deriving the full-reducing krivine machine from the smallstep operational semantics of normal order. In PPDP, pages 85–96,
2013.
[Ses97]
Peter Sestoft. Deriving a lazy abstract machine. J. Funct. Program.,
7(3):231–264, 1997.
[SGM02]
David Sands, Jörgen Gustavsson, and Andrew Moran. Lambda
calculi and linear speedups. In The Essence of Computation, pages
60–84, 2002.
12
[vRSSX99] Femke van Raamsdonk, Paula Severi, Morten Heine Sørensen, and
Hongwei Xi. Perpetual reductions in lambda-calculus. Inf. Comput.,
149(2):173–225, 1999.
[Wan07]
Mitchell Wand. On the correctness of the krivine machine. HigherOrder and Symbolic Computation, 20(3):231–235, 2007.
Proof Appendix
6.1
Proof of the properties of the Maximal Strategy (L.2.2,
p. 3)
Proof. By induction on t. Cases:
• Variable, i.e. t = x. Then t is normal, absurd.
• Abstraction, i.e. t = λx.r. Then by i.h. there exists s such that r →Maxβ s.
By rule (λ), t = λx.r →Maxβ λx.s, i.e. just take u := λx.s. Determinism:
it follows from the i.h.
• Application, i.e. t = rs. Two cases:
– r is an abstraction, i.e. r = λx.p. Two sub-cases:
∗ x ∈ r or s is normal. Then t = (λx.p)s 7→Maxβ p{x s}. Determinism: the rules for Max contexts do not allow to evaluate in r,
because λz.r is applied, nor to evaluate in s (if it is not normal)
because then x ∈ r and so rule (gc) cannot be applied.
∗ x∈
/ r and s is not normal. By i.h. there exists a unique q such
that s →Maxβ q, that is, there is a perpetual context C such that
s = Chs′ i →Maxβ Chq ′ i with s′ 7→Maxβ q ′ . By rule (gc), (λx.p)C is
a Max-context and t = (λx.p)Chs′ i →Maxβ (λx.p)Chq ′ i. Clearly,
there cannot be any →Maxβ redex in r, so determinism holds.
– r is not an abstraction. Two sub-cases:
∗ r is not normal. Then by i.h. there exists unique p such that
r →Maxβ p, By rule (@l), t = rs →Maxβ ps. Since r reduces, it is
not neutral and so there cannot be →Maxβ redexes in s (because
rule (gc)does not apply).
∗ r is normal and thus neutral. Then s is not normal (otherwise
t is normal, absurd). By i.h. there exists unique p such that
s →Maxβ p. By rule (@r), t = rs →Maxβ rp, and since r is neutral
this is the unique →Maxβ redex of t.
6.2
Definition of Grafting and Unfolding, and their Properties
The unfolding of the environment E on a code t is defined as the recursive
capture-allowing substitution (called grafting) of the entries of E on t.
13
Definition 6.2 (Grafting and Environment Unfolding). The operation of grafting t{|x u|} is defined by
(rs){|x u|}
x{|x u|}
:= r{|x u|}s{|x u|}
:= u
(λy.r){|x u|} :=
y{|x u|} :=
λy.r{|x u|}
y
Given an environment E we define the unfolding of E on a code t as follows:
[x u]l ::E
u Er E
λx.u E
x
x
[x u]l ::E ′
t{|x u|}
:=
→
t
ǫ
→
t
:=
→
t
E
or equivalently as:
u
x
E′
x
:=
→
[y u]l ::E ′
:=
:=
→→
→→
E
:=
:=
→→
E
→
→→
(ur)
(λx.u)
E′
ǫ
→
For instance, (λx.y) [y xx]neu = λx.(xx). The unfolding is extended to
contexts as expected (i.e. recursively propagating the unfolding and setting
h·i E = E).
Let us explain the need for grafting. In [ABM15], the Strong MAM is decoded to the LSC, that is a calculus with explicit substitutions, i.e. a calculus
able to represent the environment of the Strong MAM. Matching the representation of the environment on the Strong MAM and on the LSC does not need
grafting but it is, however, a quite technical affair. Useful sharing adds many
further complications in establishing such a matching, because useful evaluation computes a shared representation of the normal form and forces some of
the explicit substitutions to stay under abstractions. The difficulty is such, in
fact, that we found much easier to decode directly to the λ-calculus rather than
to the LSC. Such an alternative solution, however, has to push the substitution
induced by the environment through abstractions, which is why we use grafting.
The following easy properties will be used to prove the correctness of the
machine (in Lemma 6.7).
→
Lemma 6.3 (Properties of Grafting and Unfolding).
1. If the bound names of t do not appear free in u then t{x u} = t{|x u|}.
E}
= t{x u}
E.
→
6.3
u
→
E {x
→
2. If moreover they do not appear free in E then t
Proof of the Commutative Transparency Lemma (L.4.1,
p. 8)
1. Transitions:
• Case (F, tu, π, E, H)
Dhhtiu :: πi.
Hc1
(F, t, u :: π, E, H). We have Dhπhtuii =
• Case (F, λx.t, u :: π, E, H) Hc7 (F :: λx.tπ, u, ǫ, E, H). We have
Dhhλx.tiu :: πi = Dhπh(λx.t)uii = (F :: λx.tπ)hui.
• Case (F, λx.t, ǫ, E, H)
F :: xhti.
• Case (F, x, π, E, H)
Hc2
Hc3
• Case (F :: x, t, ǫ, E, N)
(F :: x, t, ǫ, E, H). We have F hλx.ti =
(F, x, π, E, N). Nothing to prove.
Nc4
(F, λx.t, ǫ, E, N). Exactly as
14
Hc2 .
x
• Case (F :: t♦π, u, ǫ, E, N)
Dhπhtuii.
Nc5
(F, tu, π, E, N). We have (F :: t♦π)hui =
• Case (F, t, u :: π, E, N) Nc6 (F :: t♦π, u, ǫ, E, H). We have Dhhtiu :: πi =
Dhπhtuii = (F :: t♦π)hui.
6.4
E
′
=P.1 F ′ hht iπ ′ i
= s′ .
→
→
2. We have s = F hhtiπi
E
The Checking AM Invariants Lemma (L.6.5, p. 15)
Before the invariants we need a lemma to be used in the proof of the decoding
invariant.
Lemma 6.4. Let C be a context.
1. Right Extension: Ch·i is Max iff Chh·iui is Max;
2. Left Neutral Extension: Ch·i is Max and u is neutral iff Chuh·ii is Max;
3. Abstraction Extension: Ch·i is Max and not applicative iff Chλx.h·ii is
Max.
4. Erasing Redexes Extension: Ch·i is Max and x ∈
/ fv(t) iff Ch(λx.t)h·ii is
Max.
→
5. Unfolding Removal: if C
E
is Max then C is Max.
Proof. By induction on the predicate C is Max (Definition 2.1, page 2).
Now, some terminology:
• A state s is initial if it is of the form (ǫ, t, ǫ, E, H) with E well-labeled, t
well-named and such that the variables abstracted in t do not occur in E.
• A state s is reachable if there are an initial state s′ and a Checking AM
execution ρ : s′ ⇀∗ s.
Finally:
Lemma 6.5 (Checking AM Invariants, Proof at P. 15). Let F | u | π | E | ϕ be
a Checking AM state reachable from an initial state of code t0 . Then
1. Normal Form:
→
(a) Backtracking Code: if ϕ = N, then u
empty, then u E is neutral;
E
is normal, and if π is non-
→
→
(b) Frame: if F = F ′ :: r♦π ′ :: F ′′ , then r
E
is neutral.
2. Subterm:
(a) Evaluating Code: if ϕ = H, then u is a subterm of t0 ;
(b) Stack: any code in the stack π is a subterm of t0 ;
(c) Frame:
i. Head Contexts: if F = F ′ :: r♦π ′ :: F ′′ , then any code in π ′ is a
subterm of t0 ;
15
ii. Erasing Redexes: if F = F ′ :: λx.rπ ′ :: F ′′ , then λx.r and any
code in π ′ are subterms of t0 ;
→
3. Erasing Redexes: if F = F ′ :: λx.rπ ′ :: F ′′ then x does not occur in E,
x∈
/ fv(r), and x ∈
/ fv(r E ).
4. Decoding: Cs is a Max context.
Proof.
1. Normal Form: the invariant trivially holds for an initial state ǫ | t | ǫ |
E | H. For a non-empty evaluation sequence we list the cases for the last
transition. We omit Hc1 because it follows immediately from the i.h.
• Case (F, λx.t, ǫ, E, H)
Hc2
(F :: x, t, ǫ, E, H).
(a) Backtracking Code: trivial since ϕ 6= N.
(b) Frame: it follows by the i.h., since the transition only extends F
with an item that is not a head context.
• Case (F, λx.t, u :: π, E, H)
fv(t).
Hc7
/
(F :: λx.tπ, u, ǫ, E, H) with x ∈
(a) Backtracking Code: trivial since ϕ 6= N.
(b) Frame: it follows by the i.h., since the transition only extends F
with an item that is not a head context.
• Case (F, x, π, E, H) Hc3 (F, x, π, E, N) with E(x) = ⊥ or E(x) =
[x u]neu or (E(x) = [x u]abs and π = ǫ).
→
(a) Backtracking Code: three cases depending on E:
i. E(x) = ⊥: then x E = x, that is both a normal and a
neutral term.
ii. E(x) = [x u]neu : more precisely E = E1 :: [x u]neu :: E2 .
Then we have x E = x E1 ::[x u]neu ::E2 = x [x u]neu ::E2 =
u E2 that is a neutral term because E is well-labeled. Note
that E1 cannot bound x because of the freshness requirements in the definition of well-labeled environment.
iii. E(x) = [x u]abs and π = ǫ: similarly to the previous case
we obtain that x E is a normal abstraction.
(b) Frame: it follows from the i.h., as F is unchanged.
→
→
→
→
→
• Case (F :: x, t, ǫ, E, N)
(F, λx.t, ǫ, E, N).
Nc4
→
(a) Backtracking Code: by i.h. we know that t E is a normal term.
Then (λx.t) E = λx.t E is a normal term. The stack is empty,
so we conclude.
(b) Frame: it follows from the i.h., as F is unchanged.
→
→
• Case (F :: t♦π, u, ǫ, E, N)
Nc5
(F, tu, π, E, N).
→
(a) Backtracking Code: by i.h. we have that u E is a normal term
while by Point 1b of the i.h. t E is a neutral term. Therefore
(tu) E = t E u E is a neutral term.
(b) Frame: it follows from the i.h., as F is unchanged.
→
→
→
→
• Case (F, t, u :: π, E, N)
Nc6
(F :: t♦π, u, ǫ, E, H).
16
→
(a) Backtracking Code: trivial since ϕ 6= N.
(b) Frame: t E is a neutral term by Point 1a of the i.h., the rest
follows from the i.h.
2. Subterm: This is a special case of the more refined subterm invariant of
the Max MAM (Lemma 6.9.1, page 26).
→
3. Erasing Redexes: the invariant trivially holds for an initial state ǫ | t |
ǫ | E | H. For a non-empty evaluation sequence, for all transitions
but Hc7 the statement follows immediately from the i.h. because they
all leave untouched the erasing redex items in the frame. So consider
(F, λx.r, u :: π, E, H)
Hc7 (F :: λx.rπ, u, π, E, H). By the hypothesis on the transition, we have x ∈
/ fv(r). By the subterm invariant
(Lemma 6.5.2a), λx.r is a subterm of the initial term and so, by the hypotheses on initial states, x does not occur in E. Last, since x does not
occur in E nor in r, clearly it does not occur in r E .
→
4. Decoding: the invariant trivially holds for an initial state ǫ | t | ǫ | E | H.
For a non-empty evaluation sequence we list the cases for the last transition. To simplify the reasoning in the following case analysis we let implicit
that the unfolding spreads on all the subterms, i.e. that Dhhtiπi E =
F E hht E iπ E i. Cases:
→
→
→
→
→
• Case s′ = (F, tu, π, E, H) Hc1 (F, t, u :: π, E, H) = s. By Lemma 6.4.1,
Cs = Dhh·iu :: πi E is Max iff Cs′ = Dhh·iπi E is Max, and Cs′ is
Max by i.h.
→
→
→
→
/
• Case (F, λx.r, u :: π, E, H) Hc7 (F :: λx.rπ, u, ǫ, E, H) with x ∈
fv(t).
By i.h., Cs′ = F hh·iu :: πi E = F E hh·iu E :: π E i is Max, and by
Lemma 6.4.1 F E hh·iπ E i is Max. By the erasing redexes invariant (Lemma 6.5.3), we have x ∈
/ fv(r E ). Then by Lemma 6.4.4
F E hh(λx.r E )h·iiπ E i = F hh(λx.r)h·iiπi E = Cs′ is Max.
→
→
→
→
→
→
→
→
→
• Case s′ = (F, λx.t, ǫ, E, H) Hc2 (F :: x, t, ǫ, E, H) = s. We have
Cs = Dhλx.h·ii E and by i.h. we know that Dh·i E = Cs′ is Max.
Note that by definition the decoding of frames cannot be applicative.
Then Cs is Max by Lemma 6.4.3.
→
• Case s′ = (F, x, π, E, H) Hc3 (F, x, π, E, N) = s with E(x) = ⊥
or E(x) = [x u]neu or (E(x) = [x u]abs and π = ǫ). We have
Cs = Dhh·iπi E = Cs′ , and so the statement follows immediately
from the i.h.
→
→
• Case s′ = (F :: x, t, ǫ, E, N) Nc4 (F, λx.t, ǫ, E, N) = s.
We have Cs = Dh·i E and by i.h. we know that Dhλx.h·ii
is Max. Then Cs is Max by Lemma 6.4.3.
E
= Cs′
→
→
• Case s′ = (F :: t♦π, u, ǫ, E, N) Nc5 (F, tu, π, E, N) = s. By i.h.
Cs′ = Dhhth·iiπi E is Max, and so by Lemma 6.4.2 Dhh·iπi E = Cs
is Max.
17
→
→
→
• Case s′ = (F, t, u :: π, E, N) Nc6 (F :: t♦π, u, ǫ, E, H) = s. By
i.h. Cs′ = Dhh·iπi E = F E hh·iπ E i is Max, and by Lemma 6.5.1a
→
applied to s′ we obtain that t E is neutral (because the stack is nonempty). So by Lemma 6.4.2 F E hht E h·iiπ E i = F hhth·iiπi E = Cs
is Max.
→
→
→
→
6.5
Proof of the Checking AM Properties Theorem (Thm 4.3,
p. 9)
Proof.
1. An inspection of the transition rules shows that there always is one and
exactly one transition of the Checking AM that applies: for each phase (H
and N) consider each case of the code (application, abstraction, variable)
and the various combinations stack/frame.
2. By the previous point, the executions of the Checking AM are sequences
of commutative steps that either diverge or are followed by an output
transition. We now introduce a measure and prove that the sequence of
commutative steps is always finite. In particular, it is bounded by the size
of the initial term.
Consider the following notion of size for stacks, frames, and states:
|ǫ| :=
|t :: π| :=
|(F, t, π, E, H)| :=
0
|t| + |π|
|F | + |π| + |t|
|F :: x|
|F :: t♦π|
|F :: λx.tπ|
|(F, t, π, E, N)|
:=
:=
:=
:=
|F |
|π| + |F |
|t| + |π| + |F |
|F | + |π|
The proof of the bound is in 3 steps:
(a) Evaluation Commutative Steps Are Bound by the Size of the Initial
Term.
By direct inspection of the rules of the machine it can be checked
that:
′
• Evaluation Commutative Rules Decrease the Size: if s
a s
with a ∈ {Hc1 , Hc2 , Hc3 , Hc7 } then |s′ | < |s|;
• Backtracking Transitions do not Change the Size: if s a s′ with
a ∈ {Nc4 , Nc5 , Nc6 } then |s′ | = |s|.
Then a straightforward induction on the length of an execution ρ
shows that
|s′ | ≤ |s| − |ρ|Hc
i.e. that |ρ|Hc ≤ |s| − |s′ | ≤ |s| = |(ǫ, t, ǫ, E, H)| = |t|.
(b) Backtracking Commutative Steps Are Bound by the Evaluation Ones.
We have to estimate |ρ|Nc = |ρ|Nc4 + |ρ|Nc5 + |ρ|Nc6 . Note that
i. |ρ|Nc4 ≤ |ρ|Hc2 , as
Nc4 ;
ii. |ρ|Nc5 ≤ |ρ|Nc6 , as
Nc6 ;
Nc4
pops variables from F , pushed only by
Nc5
pops pairs t♦π from F , pushed only by
18
iii. |ρ|Nc6 ≤ |ρ|Hc3 , as
by Hc3 .
ends backtracking phases, started only
Nc6
Then |ρ|Nc ≤ |ρ|Hc2 + 2|ρ|Hc3 ≤ 2|ρ|Hc .
(c) Bounding All Commutative Steps by the Size of the Intial Term. We
have |ρ|c = |ρ|Hc + |ρ|Nc ≤P.2 = |ρ|Hc + 2|ρ|Hc ≤P.1 3 · |t|.
→
3. By the previous points executions of the Checking AM are sequences of
commutative transitions followed by an output transition, i.e. they have
the form s ⇀∗c s′ ⇀o l where l is the output label of the machine. The
initial state by hypothesis is s := (ǫ, t, , E, H). Since commutative transitions do not change the decoding (Lemma 4.1), we have s′ = s = t E . To
prove that [x t]l :: E is well-labeled—that requires to prove properties of
t E —we will then look at s′ and at the various possible output transitions.
Five cases:
→
• s′ = (F, λy.r, u :: π, E, H) ⇀o1 (red, 1) with y ∈ fv(r). Then
E hh(λy.r E )u E iπ E i
→
that has a β-redex.
Now, we show that t decomposes as a 7→Maxβ -redex in a Max context. By Lemma 6.5.4, F hh·iu :: πi E = Cs′ is a Max context. By
Lemma 6.4.5, F hh·iu :: πi is also Max. Then F hh·iπi is Max by
Lemma 6.4.1. Moreover, (λy.r)u is a 7→Maxβ redex because y ∈ fv(r)
by hypothesis. Finally, t = F hh(λy.r)uiπi by Lemma 4.1.1.
The Checking AM is executed only on terms that are not variables,
and so [x t](red,1) :: E is well-labeled.
• s′ = (F, y, π, E, H) ⇀o2 (red, n + 1) with E(y) = [y u](red,n) . Then
=F
E hhy E iπ E i
→
E
→
= s′ = F hhyiπi
→
E
→
→
t
→
Since E is well-labeled and E(y) = [y u](red,n) we have that y E
contains a β-redex, and so does t E .
Now, we show that t decomposes as a variable in a Max context. By
Lemma 6.5.4, F hh·iπi E = Cs′ is a Max context. By Lemma 6.4.5,
F hh·iπi is also Max. Finally, t = F hhyiπi by Lemma 4.1.1.
Therefore [x t](red,n+1) :: E is well-labeled.
→
→
• s′ = (F, y, u :: π, E, H) ⇀o3 (red, 2) with E(y) = [y u]abs . Then
=F
E hhy E u E iπ E i
→
E
→
= F hhyuiπi
→
E
→
= s′ = F hhyiu :: πi
→
E
→
→
t
→
Since E is well-labeled and E(y) = [x u]abs we have that y E is an
abstraction and so t E contains the β-redex y E u E .
Now, we show that t decomposes as a variable in an applicative Max
context. By Lemma 6.5.4, F hh·iu :: πi E = Cs′ is a Max context. By
Lemma 6.4.5, F hh·iu :: πi is also Max. Additionally, it is applicative.
Finally, t = F hhyiu :: πi by Lemma 4.1.1.
Therefore [x t](red,2) :: E is well-labeled.
→
→
→
→
19
→
=F
E
→
= F hh(λy.r)uiπi
→
E
→
= s′ = F hhλy.riu :: πi
→
E
→
→
t
→→
→
→→
• s′ = (ǫ, ur, ǫ, E, N) ⇀o4 neu. Then t = ur by the commutative
transparency lemma (Lemma 4.1.1), and so t is an application. By
the normal form invariant (Lemma 6.5.1a), t E = (ur) E is normal.
Moreover, it is an application, because (ur) E = u E r E , and so it
is neutral. Then [x t]neu :: E is well-labeled.
→
→
• s′ = (ǫ, λy.u, ǫ, E, N) ⇀o5 abs. Then t = λy.u by the commutative
transparency lemma (Lemma 4.1.1), and so t is an abstraction. By
the normal form invariant (Lemma 6.5.1a), t E = (λy.u) E is normal. Moreover, it is an abstraction, because (λy.u) E = λy.u E .
Then [x t]abs :: E is well-labeled.
→
→
• s′ = (F :: λy.rπ, u, ǫ, E, N) ⇀o6 (red, 1). Then
→
E hh(λy.r E )u E iπ E i
=F
→
E
→
= s′ = F hh(λy.r)uiπi
→
E
→
→
t
→
that has a β-redex.
Now, we show that t decomposes as a 7→Maxβ -redex in a Max context. By Lemma 6.5.4, F hh(λy.r)h·iiπi E = Cs′ is a Max context. By Lemma 6.4.5, F hh(λy.r)h·iiπi is also Max. Then F hh·iπi
is Max by Lemma 6.4.1. Moreover, by the normal form invariant
(Lemma 6.5.1a) u is normal and by the erasing redexes invariant
(Lemma 6.5.3) y does not occur in r. Then (λy.r)u is a 7→Maxβ redex.
Finally, t = F hh(λy.r)uiπi by Lemma 4.1.1.
The Checking AM is executed only on terms that are not variables,
and so [x t](red,1) :: E is well-labeled.
6.6
Useful MAM Qualitative Study (L.6.6, p. 20)
Four invariants are required. The normal form and decoding invariants are
exactly those of the Checking AM (and the proof for the commutative transitions
is the same). The environment labels invariant follows from the correctness of
the Checking AM (Theorem 4.3.2). The name invariant is used in the proof of
Lemma 6.7.
Lemma 6.6 (Max MAM Qualitative Invariants, Proof at Page 20). Let s =
F | u | π | E | ϕ be a state reachable from an initial term t0 . Then:
1. Environment Labels: E is well-labeled.
2. Normal Form:
→
(a) Backtracking Code: if ϕ = N, then u
empty, then u E is neutral;
E
is normal, and if π is non-
→
→
(b) Frame: if F = F ′ :: r♦π ′ :: F ′′ , then r
E
is neutral.
3. Name:
(a) Substitutions: if E = E ′ :: [x t] :: E ′′ then x is fresh wrt t and E ′′ ;
(b) Abstractions and Evaluation: if ϕ = H and λx.t is a subterm of u,
π, or π ′ (if F = F ′ :: r♦π ′ :: F ′′ ) or of a erasing redex item in F
then x may occur only in t;
20
(c) Abstractions and Backtracking: if ϕ = N and λx.t is a subterm of π
or π ′ (if F = F ′ :: r♦π ′ :: F ′′ ) or of a erasing redex item in F then
x may occur only in t.
E.
→
/ r and x ∈
/r
4. Erasing Redexes: if F = F ′ :: λx.rπ ′ :: F ′′ , then x ∈
5. Decoding: Cs is a Max context.
Proof.
1. Environment Labels: the only transition that extends the environment is
m2 , and it preserves well-labeledness by Theorem 4.3.3.
2. Normal Form: for the commutative transitions the proof is exactly as
for the Checking AM, see Lemma 6.5.1 whose proof is at page 15. For
the multiplicative and exponential transitions the invariant holds trivially:
the backtracking code part because these transition cannot happen during
backtracking (note that m3 may happen during backtracking but it ends
in a evaluating state, for which then nothing has to be proven), and the
frame part because they do not touch the head context items in the frame.
3. Name: the invariant trivially holds for an initial state ǫ | t | ǫ | ǫ | H. For
a non-empty evaluation sequence we list the cases for the last transition.
• Principal Cases:
– Case s′ = (F, λx.t, y :: π, E, H) m1 (F, t{x y}, π, E, H) = s.
(a) Substitution: it follows from the i.h.
(b) Abstractions and Evaluation: it follows from the i.h.
– Case s′ = (F, λx.t, u :: π, E, H) m2 (F, t, π, [x u]l :: E, H) = s
with u not a variable and x ∈ fv(t).
(a) Substitution: it follows from the i.h. for abstractions in the
evaluation phase (Point 3b).
(b) Abstractions and Evaluation: it follows from the i.h.
α
– Case s′ = (F, x, π, E, H) ered (F, t , π, E, H) = s with E(x) =
[x u](red,n) .
(a) Substitution: it follows from the i.h.
(b) Abstractions and Evaluation: it follows by the i.h. and the
α
fact that in t the abstracted variables are renamed (wrt t)
with fresh names.
α
– Case s′ = (F, x, u :: π, E, H) eabs (F, t , u :: π, E, H) = s with
abs
E(x) = [x u] .
(a) Substitution: it follows from the i.h.
(b) Abstractions and Evaluation: it follows by the i.h. and the
α
fact that in t the abstracted variables are renamed (wrt t)
with fresh names.
– Case (F :: λx.tπ, u, ǫ, E, N) m3 (F, t, π, E, H).
(a) Substitution: it follows from the i.h.
(b) Abstractions and Evaluation: it follows by the i.h.
• Commutative Cases:
21
– Case s′ = (F, tu, π, E, H) Hc1 (F, t, u :: π, E, H) = s.
(a) Substitution: it follows from the i.h.
(b) Abstractions and Evaluation: it follows from the i.h.
– Case (F, λx.r, u :: π, E, H) Hc7 (F :: λx.rπ, u, ǫ, E, H) with
x∈
/ fv(t).
(a) Substitution: it follows from the i.h.
(b) Abstractions and Evaluation: it follows from the i.h.
– Case s′ = (F, λx.t, ǫ, E, H) Hc2 (F :: x, t, ǫ, E, H) = s.
(a) Substitution: it follows from the i.h.
(b) Abstractions and Evaluation: it follows from the i.h.
– Case s′ = (F, x, π, E, H) Hc3 (F, x, π, E, N) = s with E(x) =
⊥ or E(x) = [x u]neu or (E(x) = [x u]abs and π = ǫ) .
(a) Substitution: it follows from the i.h.
3. Abstractions and Backtracking: it follows from the i.h. of
Abstraction and Evaluation (Point 3b).
– Case s′ = (F :: x, t, ǫ, E, N) Nc4 (F, λx.t, ǫ, E, N) = s.
(a) Substitution: it follows from the i.h.
3. Abstractions and Backtracking: it follows from the i.h.
– Case s′ = (F :: t♦π, u, ǫ, E, N) Nc5 (F, tu, π, E, N) = s.
(a) Substitution: it follows from the i.h.
3. Abstractions and Backtracking: it follows from the i.h.
– Case s′ = (F, t, u :: π, E, N) Nc6 (F :: t♦π, u, ǫ, E, H) = s.
(a) Substitution: it follows from the i.h.
(b) Abstractions and Evaluation: it follows from the i.h. for
Abstractions and Backtracking (Point 3c)
→
4. Erasing: the invariant trivially holds for an initial state ǫ | t | ǫ | ǫ |
H. For a non-empty evaluation sequence, for all transitions but Hc7
the statement follows immediately from the i.h. because they all leave
untouched the erasing redex items in the frame (but for m3 that, however,
simply removes one such entry and so trivially preserves the invariant).
So consider (F, λx.r, u :: π, E, H) Hc7 (F :: λx.rπ, u, π, E, H). By the
hypothesis on the transition, we have x ∈
/ fv(r). By the name invariant
(Lemma 6.6.3b), x does not occur in E. Last, since x does not occur in
E nor in r, clearly it does not occur in r E .
→
5. Decoding: the invariant trivially holds for an initial state ǫ | t | ǫ | ǫ | H.
For a non-empty evaluation sequence we list the cases for the last transition. To simplify the reasoning in the following case analysis we let implicit
that the unfolding spreads on all the subterms, i.e. that Dhhtiπi E =
F E hht E iπ E i.
→
→
→
• Principal Cases:
22
→
→
– Case s′ = (F, λx.t, y :: π, E, H) m1 (F, t{x y}, π, E, H) = s.
By Lemma 6.4.1, Cs = Dhh·iπi E is Max iff Cs′ = Dhh·iy :: πi
is Max, and Cs′ is Max by i.h.
E
→
– Case s′ = (F, λx.t, u :: π, E, H) m2 (F, t, π, [x u]l :: E, H) = s
with x ∈ fv(t).
We have to prove that Cs′ = Dhh·iπi [x u]l ::E is Max. By the
name invariant for abstractions (Lemma 6.6.3b) we have that x
does not occur in F nor π, and so Dhh·iπi [x u]l ::E = Dhh·iπi E .
Now, by Lemma 6.4.1 Dhh·iπi E is Max iff Dhh·iu :: πi E is Max,
that holds by i.h., because this is exactly Cs′ .
α
– Case s′ = (F, x, π, E, H) ered (F, t , π, E, H) = s with E(x) =
[x u](red,n) . We have Cs = Dhh·iπi E = Cs′ , and so the statement follows immediately from the i.h.
α
– Case s′ = (F, x, u :: π, E, H) eabs (F, t , u :: π, E, H) = s with
abs
E(x) = [x u] . We have Cs = Dhh·iπi E = Cs′ , and so the
statement follows immediately from the i.h.
– Case s′ = (F :: λx.tπ, u, ǫ, E, N) m3 (F, t, π, E, H) = s.
We have Cs = Dhh·iπi E = F E hht E iπ E i. By the erasing redexes invariant (Lemma 6.6.4), x ∈
/ r E . Then, by Lemma 6.4.4
Cs is Max if and only if F E hh(λx.r E )h·iiπ E i = F hh(λy.r)h·iiπi
Cs′ is Max, that holds by i.h.
→
→
→
→
→
→
→
→
→
→
→
→
→
→
→
E
=
• Commutative Cases: exactly as in the proof of Lemma 6.5.4.
We can now show how every single transition projects on the λ-calculus, and
in particular that multiplicative transitions project to Max β-steps.
Lemma 6.7 (One-Step Weak Simulation). Let s be a reachable state.
1. Commutative: if s
c1,2,3,4,5,6,7
2. Exponential: if s
eabs,red
3. Multiplicative: if s
m1,2,3
s′ then s = s′ ;
s′ then s = s′ ;
s′ then s →Maxβ s′ .
Proof.
1. Commutative: the proof is exactly as the one for the Checking AM (Lemma 4.1.2),
that can be found at page 15.
2. Exponential :
α
• Case s = (F, x, π, E, H) ered (F, t , π, E, H) = s′ with E(x) =
[x t](red,n) . Then E = E ′ :: [x t](red,n) :: E ′′ for some environments E ′ , and E ′′ . Remember that terms are considered up to αequivalence.
Ei
=
Cs′ ht
E ′′ i
= Cs′ ht
Ei
→
Cs′ hx
→
=
→
s
= s′
α
→
→
In the chain of equalities we can replace t E ′′ with t E because by
well-labeledness the variables bound by E ′ are fresh with respect to
t.
• Case s = (F, x, u :: π, E, H) eabs (F, t , u :: π, E, H) = s′ with
E(x) = [x t]abs . The proof that s = s′ is exactly as in the previous
case.
23
3. Multiplicative:
→
• Case s = (F, λx.t, y :: π, E, H) m1 (F, t{x y}, π, E, H) = s′ . Note
that Cs′ = Dhπi E is Max by the decoding invariant (Lemma 6.6.5).
Note also that by the name invariant (Lemma 6.6.3b) x can only
occur in t. Then:
(F, λx.t, y :: π, E, H) =
=
=
→Maxβ
=L.6.6.3b&L.6.3.2
=
→
F hhλx.tiy :: πi E
F hh(λx.t)yiπi E
Cs′ h(λx.t E )y E i
Cs′ ht E {x y E }i
Cs′ ht{x y} E i
(F, t{x y}, π, E, H)
→→→
→
→
→
→
→
l
′
• Case s = (F, λx.t, u :: π, E, H)
m2 (F, t, π, [x u] :: E, H) = s
with u not a variable. By the name invariant (Lemma 6.6.3b) x
can only occur in t and so Cs′ = Dhh·iπi [x u]l ::E = Dhh·iπi E =
F E hh·iπ E i. Moreover, such a context is Max by the decoding
invariant (Lemma 6.6.5). Then:
→
→
=
=
=
→Maxβ
=L.6.6.3b&L.6.3.2
=
=L.6.6.3b&L.6.3.1
=L.6.6.3b
=
=
F hhλx.tiu :: πi E
F hh(λx.t)uiπi E
F E hh(λx.t E )u E iπ E i
F E hht E {x u E }iπ E i
F E hht{x u} E iπ E i
F hht{x u}iπi E
F hht{|x u|}iπi E
F hhtiπi{|x u|} E
F hhtiπi [x u]l ::E
(F, t, π, [x u]l :: E, H)
→→
(F, λx.t, u :: π, E, H)
→→
→→
→
→
→ →→→
→
→→→
→
→
F hh(λx.t)uiπi E
F E hh(λx.t E )u
F E hht E iπ E i
Dhhtiπi E
→
E iπ E i
→
→→
→→
→→
(F :: λx.tπ, u, ǫ, E, N) =
=
→Maxβ
=
→
→
→
• Case s = (F :: λx.tπ, u, ǫ, E, N) m3 (F, t, π, E, H) = s′ .
Note that Cs′ = Dhh·iπi E = F E hh·iπ E i is Max by the decoding
invariant (Lemma 6.6.5). Then:
=
(F, t, π, E, H)
We also need to show that the Max MAM computes β-normal forms.
Lemma 6.8 (Progress). Let s be a reachable final state. Then s is β-normal.
→
Proof. A simple inspection of the machine transitions shows that final states
have the form (ǫ, t, ǫ, E, N). Then by the normal form invariant (Lemma 6.6.2a)
s = t E is β-normal.
24
6.7
Proof of the Weak Bisimulation Theorem (Thm 5.1,
p. 10)
Proof.
1. By induction on the length |ρ| of ρ, using the one-step weak simulation
lemma (Lemma 6.7). If ρ is empty then the empty derivation satisfies the
statement. If ρ is given by σ : s ∗ s′′ followed by s′′
s′ then by i.h.
∗
′′
′′
′
there exists e : s →Maxβ s s.t. |e| = |σ|m . Cases of s
s:
(a) Commutative or Exponential. Then s′′ = s′ by Lemma 6.7.1 and
Lemma 6.7.2, and the statement holds taking d := e because |d| =
|e| =i.h. |σ|m = |ρ|m .
(b) Multiplicative. Then s′′ →Maxβ s′ by Lemma 6.7.3 and defining d as
e followed by such a step we obtain |d| = |e| + 1 =i.h. |σ|m + 1 = |ρ|m .
2. We use nfec (s) to denote the normal form of s with respect to exponential
and commutative transitions, that exists and is unique because c ∪ e
terminates (termination is given by forthcoming Theorem 6.12 and Theorem 6.14, that are postponed because they actually give precise complexity
bounds, not just termination) and the machine is deterministic (as it can
be seen by an easy inspection of the transitions). The proof is by induction on the length of d. If d is empty then the empty execution satisfies
the statement.
If d is given by e : t →∗Maxβ r followed by r →Maxβ u then by i.h. there
is an execution σ : s ∗ s′′ s.t. r = s′′ and |σ|m = |e|. Note that since
exponential and commutative transitions are mapped on equalities, σ can
be extended as σ ′ : s ∗ s′′ ∗ered ,eabs ,c1,2,3,4,5,6 nfec (s′′ ) with nfec (s′′ ) = r
and |σ ′ |m = |e|. By the progress property (Lemma 6.8) nfec (s′′ ) cannot be
a final state, otherwise r = nfec (s′′ ) could not reduce. Then nfec (s′′ ) m
s′ (the transition is necessarily multiplicative because nfec (s′′ ) is normal
with respect to the other transitions). By the one-step weak simulation
lemma (Lemma 6.7.3) nfec (s′′ ) = r →Maxβ s′ and by determinism of →Maxβ
(Lemma 2.2.2) s′ = u. Then the execution ρ defined as σ ′ followed by
nfec (s′′ ) m s′ satisfy the statement, as |ρ|m = |σ ′ |m + 1 = |σ|m + 1 =
|e| + 1 = |d|.
6.8
Quantitative Analysis
The complexity analyses of this section rely on two additional invariants of the
Max MAM, the subterm and the environment size invariants.
The subterm invariant bounds the size of the duplicated subterms and it is
crucial. For us, u is a subterm of t if it does so up to variable names, both free
and bound. More precisely: define t− as t in which all variables (including those
appearing in binders) are replaced by a fixed symbol ∗. Then, we will consider
u to be a subterm of t whenever u− is a subterm of t− in the usual sense. The
key property ensured by this definition is that the size |u| of u is bounded by
|t|.
25
Lemma 6.9 (Max MAM Quantitative Invariants). Let s = F | u | π | E | ϕ be
a state reachable by the execution ρ from the initial code t0 .
1. Subterm:
(a) Evaluating Code: if ϕ = H, then u is a subterm of t0 ;
(b) Stack: any code in the stack π is a subterm of t0 ;
(c) Frame:
i. Head Contexts: if F = F ′ :: r♦π ′ :: F ′′ , then any code in π ′ is a
subterm of t0 ;
ii. Erasing Redexes: if F = F ′ :: λx.rπ ′ :: F ′′ , then λx.r and any
code in π ′ are subterms of t0 ;
(d) Global Environment: if E = E ′ :: [x r]l :: E ′′ , then r is a subterm
of t0 ;
2. Environment Size: the length of the global environment E is bound by |ρ|m .
Proof.
1. Subterm: the invariant trivially holds for the initial state ǫ | t0 | ǫ |
ǫ | H. In the inductive case we look at the last transition:
• Principal Cases:
– Case s′ = (F, λx.t, y :: π, E, H)
m1
(F, t{x y}, π, E, H) = s.
(a) Evaluating Code: note that according to our definition of
subterm t{x y} is a subterm of λx.t.
(b) Stack : note that any piece code in π is also in u :: π.
(c) Frame: it follows from the i.h., since F is not modified.
(d) Environment : it follows from the i.h., since E is not modified.
– Case s′ = (F, λx.t, u :: π, E, H) m2 (F, t, π, [x u]l :: E, H) = s
with u not a variable.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Evaluating Code: note that t is a subterm of λx.t.
Stack : note that any piece code in π is also in u :: π.
Frame: it follows from the i.h., since F is not modified.
Environment : the new environment is of the form [x u]l ::
E. Pieces of code in E are subterms of t0 by i.h.. Moreover
u is the top of the stack u :: π so it is also a subterm of t0 .
α
– Case s′ = (F, x, π, E, H) ered (F, t , π, E, H) = s with E(x) =
(red,n)
[x u]
.
(a) Evaluating Code: note that t is bound by E. By i.h., it is a
α
subterm of t0 . So t is also a subterm of t0 .
(b) Stack : it follows from the i.h., since the stack π is unchanged.
(c) Frame: it follows from the i.h., since the frame F is unchanged.
(d) Environment : it follows from the i.h., since the environment
E is unchanged.
α
– Case s′ = (F, x, u :: π, E, H) eabs (F, t , u :: π, E, H) = s with
abs
E(x) = [x u] .
26
(a) Evaluating Code: note that t is bound by E. By i.h., it is a
α
subterm of t0 . So t is also a subterm of t0 .
(b) Stack : it follows from the i.h., since the stack u :: π is unchanged.
(c) Frame: it follows from the i.h., since the frame F is unchanged.
(d) Environment : it follows from the i.h., since the environment
E is unchanged.
– Case s = (F :: λx.tπ, u, ǫ, E, N) m3 (F, t, π, E, H) = s′ .
(a) Evaluating Code: by the frame part of the i.h. λx.t is a
α
subterm of t0 , and so is t. So t is also a subterm of t0 .
(b) Stack : by the frame part of the i.h. the codes in π are
subterms of t0 .
(c) Frame: it follows from the i.h.
(d) Environment : it follows from the i.h., since the environment
E is unchanged.
• Commutative Cases:
– Case s′ = (F, tu, π, E, H) Hc1 (F, t, u :: π, E, H) = s.
(a) Evaluating Code: by i.h., tu is a subterm of t0 , so t is also a
subterm of t0 .
(b) Stack : by i.h., tu is a subterm of t0 , so u is also a subterm
of t0 . Moreover, any piece of code in π is a subterm of t0 by
i.h..
(c) Frame: it follows from the i.h., since the frame F is unchanged.
(d) Environment : it follows from the i.h., since the environment
E is unchanged.
– Case s′ = (F, λx.t, u :: π, E, H)
s.
Hc7
(F :: λx.tπ, u, ǫ, E, H) =
(a) Evaluating Code: by i.h., λx.t is a subterm of t0 , so t is also
a subterm of t0 .
(b) Stack : nothing to prove.
(c) Frame: for all entries in F it follows from the i.h., for the
new entry it follows by the evaluating code and stack part of
the i.h.
(d) Environment : it follows from the i.h., since the environment
E is unchanged.
– Case s′ = (F, λx.t, ǫ, E, H) Hc2 (F :: x, t, ǫ, E, H) = s.
(a) Evaluating Code: note that t is a subterm of λx.t which is
in turn a subterm of t0 by i.h..
(b) Stack : trivial since the stack π is empty.
(c) Frame: any pair of the form u♦π ′ or λx.uπ ′ in the frame
x :: F is also already present in F , so it follows by the i.h.
(d) Environment : it follows from the i.h., since the environment
E is unchanged.
27
– Case s′ = (F, x, π, E, H) Hc3 (F, x, π, E, N) = s with E(x) =
⊥ or E(x) = [x u]neu or (E(x) = [x u]abs and π = ǫ) .
(a) Evaluating Code: trivial since ϕ 6= H.
(b) Stack : it follows from the i.h., since the stack π is unchanged.
(c) Frame: it follows from the i.h., since the frame F is unchanged.
(d) Environment : it follows from the i.h., since the environment
E is unchanged.
– Case s′ = (F :: x, t, ǫ, E, N) Nc4 (F, λx.t, ǫ, E, N) = s.
(a) Evaluating Code: trivial since ϕ 6= H.
(b) Stack : trivial since the stack is empty.
(c) Frame: any pair of the form u♦π or λx.uπ ′ in the frame F
is also in the frame x :: F , so it follows from the i.h..
(d) Environment : any substitution of the form [y u] in the environment Nx :: E is also in the environment E, so u is a
subterm of t0 by i.h..
– Case s′ = (F :: t♦π, u, ǫ, E, N) Nc5 (F, tu, π, E, N) = s.
(a) Evaluating Code: trivial since ϕ 6= H.
(b) Stack : the stack π occurs at the left-hand side in the frame
t♦π :: F , so by i.h. we know that any piece of code in π is a
subterm of t0 .
(c) Frame: any pair r♦π or λx.uπ ′ in the frame F is also in
the frame t♦π :: F , so it follows from the i.h.
(d) Environment : it follows from the i.h., since the environment
E is unchanged.
– Case s′ = (F, t, u :: π, E, N) Nc6 (F :: t♦π, u, ǫ, E, H) = s.
(a) Evaluating Code: note that u is an element of the stack at
the left-hand side of the transition, so by i.h. u is a subterm
of t0 .
(b) Stack : trivial since the stack is empty.
(c) Frame: any pair in the frame t♦π :: F or λx.uπ ′ is also in
the frame F except for t♦π. Consider a piece of code s in
the stack π. It is trivially also a piece of code in the stack
u :: π, so by the second point of the i.h. we have that s is a
subterm of t0 .
(d) Environment : it follows from the i.h., since the environment
E is unchanged.
2. Environment Size: simply note that the only transition that extends the
environment is m2 .
The proof of the polynomial bound of the overhead is in three steps. First,
we bound the number |ρ|e of exponential transitions of an execution ρ using
the number |ρ|m of multiplicative transitions of ρ, that by Theorem 5.1 corresponds to the number of Max β-steps on the λ-calculus. Second, we bound the
number |ρ|c of commutative transitions of ρ by using the number of exponential
transitions and the size of the initial term. Third, we put everything together.
28
Multiplicative vs Exponential Analysis This step requires two auxiliary
lemmas. The first one essentially states that commutative transitions eat normal
and neutral terms, as well as Max contexts.
Lemma 6.10. Let s = F | t | π | E | H be a state and E be well-labeled. Then
E
is a normal term and π = ǫ then s
2. If t
E
is a neutral term then s
→ →
1. If t
∗
c
∗
c
F | t | π | E | N.
F | t | π | E | N.
→
3. If t = Chui with C E a Max context then there exist F ′ and π ′ such
that s ∗c F ′ | u | π ′ | E | H. Moreover, if C is applicative then π ′ is
non-empty.
The first two points rest on the following inductive mutually inductive definition of normal and neutral terms:
x is neutral
t is neutral
u is normal
tu is neutral
t is neutral
t is normal
t is normal
λx.t is normal
And the following two immediate properties:
E
is normal then t is normal;
2. If t
E
is neutral then t is neutral.
→ →
1. If t
Now we can proceed with the proof.
Proof.
→
1. If t E is normal then t is normal. By induction on the derivation of t is
normal. Cases:
→
• Neutral, i.e. t is neutral. If t E is neutral then it follows by Point 2.
Otherwise t = x and t E is an abstraction, i.e. E = E ′ :: [x u]abs ::
E ′′ . Then:
F | x | ǫ | E | H Hc3 F | x | ǫ | E | N
→
→
→
• Abstraction, i.e. t = λx.u with u normal. Since t E = λx.u E is
normal then u E is normal and we can use the i.h. on it. Then
→
F | λx.u | ǫ | E | H
(i.h.)
F :: x | u | ǫ | E | H
F :: x | u | ǫ | E | N
Hc2
∗
c
Hc2
F | λx.u | ǫ | E | N
→
2. If t E is neutral then t is neutral. By induction on the derivation of t is
neutral. Cases:
→
• Variable, i.e. t = x. If t E is neutral then either E(x) = ⊥ or
E = E ′ :: [x u]neu :: E ′′ . In both cases:
F |x|π|E|H
29
Hc3
F |x|π|E|N
→
• Application, i.e. t = ur with u neutral and r normal. Since ur E is
neutral, u E is neutral and r E is normal, so that we can use Point
1 and the i.h. on them. Then
→
→
F | ur | π | E | H
(i.h.)
Hc1
∗
c
(Point 1)
Nc6
∗
c
| u | r :: π | E | H
| u | r :: π | E | N
:: u♦π | r | ǫ | E | H
:: u♦π | r | ǫ | E | N
F
F
F
F
F | ur | π | E | N
Nc5
→
3. If C E is a Max context then C is a Max context by Lemma 6.4.5. By
induction on C being Max (Definition Definition 2.1, page 2). If C is
empty then it is immediate. The other cases:
→
→
→
→
• Application Left (rule (@l)), i.e. C = Dr with D Max and D 6= λx.E.
Since C E = D E r E , we have that D E is a Max context and we
can apply the i.h. to it. Then:
s = F | Dhuir | π | E | H
F | Dhui | r :: π | E | H
Hc1
Now, if D is empty then C is applicative, the stack is non-empty, and
the statement is proved. Otherwise, it follows from the i.h.:
F | Dhui | r :: π | E | H
∗
c
|{z}
F ′ | u | π′ | E | H
i.h.
• Abstraction (rule (λ)), i.e. C = λx.D with D Max. As in the previous
case, it is immediately seen that we can apply the i.h. to D.
s = F | λx.Dhui | π | E | H
Hc1
F :: x | Dhui | π | E | H
∗
c
|{z}
F ′ | u | π′ | E | H
i.h.
→
→→
→
The moreover part follows from the i.h.
• Application Right (rule (@r)), i.e. C = rD with D Max and r neutral.
Since C E = r E D E , we have that r is neutral (and so we can apply
point 2) and D E is a Max context and so we can use the i.h. on it.
s = F | rDhui | π | E | H
(Point 2)
Hc1
∗
c
Nc6
F | r | Dhui :: π | E | H
F | r | Dhui :: π | E | N
F :: r♦π | Dhui | ǫ | E | H
∗
c
|{z}
F ′ | u | π′ | E | H
(i.h.)
Hc1
Hc7
∗
c
|{z}
(i.h.)
30
→
s = F | (λx.r)Dhui | π | E | H
→
→
→
The moreover part follows from the i.h.
• Erasing Redex (rule (gc)), i.e. C = (λx.r)D with D Max and
x∈
/ fv(r). Since C E = (λx.r E )D E we have that D E is a Max
context and so we can use the i.h. on it.
F | λx.r | Dhui :: π | E | H
F :: λx.rπ | Dhui | π | E | H
F ′ | u | π′ | E | H
The moreover part follows from the i.h.
The second lemma uses Lemma 6.10 and the environment labels invariant
(Lemma 6.6.1) to show that the exponential transitions of the Max MAM are
indeed useful, as they head towards a multiplicative transition, that is towards
β-redexes.
Lemma 6.11 (Useful Exponentials Lead to Multiplicatives). Let s be a reachable state such that s e(red,n) s′ .
1. If n = 1 then s′
∗
c
m
s′′ ;
2. If n = 2 then s′
∗
c
eabs
3. If n > 1 then s′
∗
c
e(red,n−1)
∗
c
m
s′′ or s′
∗
c
e(red,1)
s′′ ;
s′′ .
α
Proof. We have (F, x, π, E, H) ered (F, t , π, E, H) with E(x) = [x t](red,n) .
By the labeled environment invariant (Lemma 6.6.1), E is well-labeled. Then
α
t = Chui with C Max context. By Lemma 6.10.3 we obtain
s′ = F | Chui | π | E | H
∗
c
F ′ | u | π′ | E | H
Three cases:
1. n = 1) then by well-labeledness u is a 7→Maxβ -redex (λx.r)s, that is, either
x∈
/ fv(r) or s is normal. First, we have
F ′ | (λx.r)s | π ′ | E | H
F ′ | (λx.r) | s :: π ′ | E | H
Hc1
m
s′′
Then there are 3 possible cases:
(a) s is a variable. Then
(b) x ∈ fv(r). Then
m2
m1
applies.
applies.
(c) x ∈
/ fv(r) and s is normal and not a variable. Then:
F ′ | (λx.r) | s :: π ′ | E | H
m
s′′
Hc7
∗
c
F :: λx.rπ | s | ǫ | E | H
F :: λx.rπ | s | ǫ | E | N
|{z}
(L.6.10.1)
m3
F |r|π|E|N
2. n = 2, E ′ = E ′′ :: [y r]l :: E ′′′ with l = abs, and C is applicative) By
well-labeledness u is a variable y and r = λz.s. Then:
s
e(red,2)
F | Chyi | π | E | H
∗
c
|{z}
(L.6.10.3)
F ′ | y | π′ | E | H
′
Always by Lemma 6.10.3, the stack π ′ is non-empty, say π ′ = t :: π ′′ .
Then we continue with:
′
eabs
F | λz.s | t :: π ′′ | E | H
31
Now we repeat the resoning for the case n = 1 completing the execution
with ∗c m .
3. n > 1 and E ′ = E ′′ :: [y r]l :: E ′′′ with l = (red, n − 1)) By welllabeledness u is a variable y. Then:
s
e(red,n)
F | Chyi | π | E | H
∗
c
|{z}
(L.6.10.3)
F ′ | y | π′ | E | H
e(red,n−1)
Finally, using the environment size invariant (Lemma 6.9.2) we obtain the local boundedness property, that is used to infer a quadratic bound via a standard
reasoning (already employed in [AL16]).
Theorem 6.12 (Exponentials vs Multiplicatives). Let s be an initial Max MAM
state and ρ : s ∗ s′ .
1. Local Boundedness: if σ : s′
∗
s′′ and |σ|m = 0 then |σ|e ≤ |ρ|m ;
2. Exponentials are Quadratic in the Multiplicatives: |ρ|e ∈ O(|ρ|2m ).
Remark 6.13. In the following proof we use the fact that in from the definition
of well-labeled environment (Definition 4.2, page 8) it immediately follows that
if E = E ′ :: [x t](red,n) :: E ′′ is well-labeled then the length of E ′′ , and thus of
E, is at least n.
Proof.
1. We prove that |σ|e ≤ |E|. The statement follows from the environment
size invariant (Lemma 6.9.2), for which |E| ≤ |ρ|m .
If |σ|e = 0 it is immediate. Then assume |σ|e > 0, so that there is a first
exponential transition in σ, i.e. σ has a prefix s′ ∗c e s′′′ followed by an
execution τ : s′′′ ∗ s′′ such that |τ |m = 0. Cases of the first exponential
transition e :
• Case eabs : the next transition is necessarily multiplicative, and so
τ is empty. Then |σ|e = 1. Since the environment is non-empty
(otherwise eabs could not apply), |σ|e ≤ |E| holds.
• Case e(red,n) : we prove by induction on n that |σ|e ≤ n, that gives
what we want because n ≤ |E| by Remark 6.13. Cases:
– n = 1) Then τ has the form s′′′ ∗c s′′ by Lemma 6.11.1, and so
|σ|e = 1.
– n = 2) Then τ is a prefix of ∗c eabs ∗c or ∗c e(red,1) by
Lemma 6.11.2. In both cases |σ|e ≤ 2.
– n > 2) Then by Lemma 6.11.3 τ is either shorter or equal to
∗
∗
e(red,n−1) ,
e(red,n−1) , and so |σ|e ≤ 2, or it is longer than
c
c
′
∗
i.e. it writes as c followed by an execution τ starting with
′
e(red,n−1) . By i.h. |τ | ≤ n − 1 and so |σ| ≤ n.
32
F ′ | r | π′ | E | H
2. This is a standard reasoning: since by local boundedness (the previous
point) m-free sequences have a number of e-transitions that are bound by
the number of preceding m-transitions, the sum of all e-transitions is bound
by the square of m-transitions. It is analogous to the proof of Theorem
7.2.3 in [AL16].
Commutative vs Exponential Analysis The second step is to bound the
number of commutative transitions. Since the commutative part of the Max
MAM is essentially the same as the commutative part of the Strong MAM of
[ABM15], the proof of such bound is essentially the same as in [ABM15]. It
relies on the subterm invariant (Lemma 6.9.1).
Theorem 6.14 (Commutatives vs Exponentials). Let ρ : s
MAM execution from an initial state of code t. Then:
∗
s′ be a Max
1. Commutative Evaluation Steps are Bilinear: |ρ|Hc ≤ (1 + |ρ|e ) · |t|.
2. Commutative Evaluation Bounds Backtracking: |ρ|Nc ≤ 2 · |ρ|Hc .
3. Commutative Transitions are Bilinear: |ρ|c ≤ 3 · (1 + |ρ|e ) · |t|.
Proof.
1. We use the following notion of size for stacks/frames/states:
|ǫ| :=
|t :: π| :=
|(F, t, π, E, H)| :=
0
|t| + |π|
|F | + |π| + |t|
|F :: x|
|F :: t♦π|
|F :: λx.tπ|
|(F, t, π, E, N)|
:=
:=
:=
:=
|F |
|π| + |F |
|t| + |π| + |F |
|F | + |π|
By direct inspection of the rules of the machine it can be checked that:
• Exponentials Increase the Size: if s e s′ is an exponential transition,
then |s′ | ≤ |s| + |t| where |t| is the size of the initial term; this is a
consequence of the fact that exponential steps retrieve a piece of
code from the environment, which is a subterm of the initial term by
Lemma 6.9.1;
• Commutative Evaluation Transitions Decrease the Size: if s a s′
with a ∈ {Hc1 , Hc2 , Hc3 , Hc7 } then |s′ | < |s| (for Hc3 because the
transition switches to backtracking, and thus the size of the code is
no longer taken into account);
• Multiplicative Transitions and Backtracking Transitions Decrease or
do not Change the Size: if s a s′ with a ∈ {m1 , m2 , m3 , Nc4 , Nc5 , Nc6 }
then |s′ | ≤ |s|.
Then a straightforward induction on |ρ| shows that
|s′ | ≤ |s| + |ρ|e · |t| − |ρ|Hc
i.e. that |ρ|Hc ≤ |s| + |ρ|e · |t| − |s′ |.
33
Now note that | · | is always non-negative and that since s is initial we
have |s| = |t|. We can then conclude with
|ρ|Hc
≤ |s| + |ρ|e · |t| − |s′ |
≤ |s| + |ρ|e · |t|
= |t| + |ρ|e · |t| =
(1 + |ρ|e ) · |t|
2. We have to estimate |ρ|Nc = |ρ|Nc4 + |ρ|Nc5 + |ρ|Nc6 . Note that
(a) |ρ|Nc4 ≤ |ρ|Hc2 , as
(b) |ρ|Nc5 ≤ |ρ|Nc6 , as
Nc6 ;
(c) |ρ|Nc6 ≤ |ρ|Hc3 , as
Hc3 .
Nc4
pops variables from F , pushed only by
pops pairs t♦π from F , pushed only by
Nc5
Nc6
Hc2 ;
ends backtracking phases, started only by
Then |ρ|Nc ≤ |ρ|Hc2 + 2|ρ|Hc3 ≤ 2|ρ|Hc .
3. We have |ρ|c = |ρ|Hc +|ρ|Nc ≤P.2 |ρ|Hc +2|ρ|Hc = 3|ρ|Hc ≤P.1 3·(1+|ρ|e )·|t|.
The Main Theorem Putting together the matching between Max β-steps
and multiplicative transitions (Theorem 5.1), the quadratic bound on the exponentials via the multiplicatives (Theorem 6.12.2) and the bilinear bound on the
commutatives (Theorem 6.14.3) we obtain that the number of the Max MAM
transitions to implement a Max β-derivation d is at most quadratic in the length
of d and linear in the size of t. Moreover, the subterm invariant (Lemma 6.9.1)
and the analysis of the Checking AM (Theorem 4.3.2) allow to bound the cost
of implementing the execution on RAM.
Theorem (Max MAM Overhead Bound). Let d : t →∗Maxβ u be a maximal
derivation and ρ be the Max MAM execution simulating d given by Theorem 5.1.2.
Then:
1. Length: |ρ| = O((1 + |d|2 ) · |t|).
2. Cost: ρ is implementable on RAM in O((1 + |d|2 ) · |t|) steps.
Proof.
1. By definition, the length of the execution ρ simulating d is given by |ρ| =
|ρ|m + |ρ|e + |ρ|c . Now, by Theorem 6.12.2 we have |ρ|e = O(|ρ|2m ) and
by Theorem 6.14.3 we have |ρ|c = O((1 + |ρ|e ) · |t|) = O((1 + |ρ|2m ) · |t|).
Therefore, |ρ| = O((1 + |ρ|e ) · |t|) = O((1 + |ρ|2m ) · |t|). By Theorem 5.1.2
|ρ|m = |d|, and so |ρ| = O((1 + |d|2 ) · |t|).
2. The cost of implementing ρ is the sum of the costs of implementing the
multiplicative, exponential, and commutative transitions. Remember that
the idea is that variables are implemented as references, so that environment can be accessed in constant time (i.e. they do not need to be accessed
sequentially). Moreover, we assuming the strong hypothesis on the representation of terms explained in the paragraph before Theorem 4.3 (page
/ fv(t) in m2 and Hc7 can be done
9), so that the tests x ∈ fv(t) and x ∈
in constant time:
34
(a) Commutative: every commutative transition takes constant time. At
the previous point we bounded their number with O((1 + |d|2 ) · |t|),
which is then also the cost of all the commutative transitions together.
(b) Multiplicative:
• a m1 transition costs O(|t|) because it requires to rename the
current code, whose size is bound by the size of the initial term
by the subterm invariant (Lemma 6.9.1a).
• A m2 transition costs O(|t|) because checking x ∈ fv(t) can
be done in constant time and executing the Checking AM on u
takes O(|u|) commutative steps (Theorem 4.3.2), commutative
steps take constant time, and the size of u is bound by |t| by the
subterm invariant (Lemma 6.9.1b).
• A m2 transition takes constant time.
Therefore, all together the multiplicative transitions cost O(|d| · |t|).
(c) Exponential : At the previous point we bounded their number with
|ρ|e = O(|d|2 ). Each exponential step copies a term from the environment, that by the subterm invariant (Lemma 6.9.1d) costs at
2
most O(|t|), and so their full cost is O((1 + |d|) · |t| ) (note that this
is exactly the cost of the commutative transitions, but it is obtained
in a different way).
2
Then implementing ρ on RAM takes O((1 + |d|) · |t| ) steps.
Remark 6.15. Our bound is quadratic in the number of the Max β-steps but we
believe that it is not tight. In fact, our transition m1 is a standard optimisation,
used for instance in Wand’s [Wan07] (section 2), Friedman et al.’s [FGSW07]
(section 4), and Sestoft’s [Ses97] (section 4), and motivated as an optimization
about space. In Sands, Gustavsson, and Moran’s [SGM02], however, it is shown
that it lowers the overhead for time from quadratic to linear (with respect to the
number of β-steps) for call-by-name evaluation in a weak setting. Unfortunately,
the simple proof used in [SGM02] does not scale up to our setting, nor we have
an alternative proof that the overhead is linear. We conjecture, however, that it
does.
35
| 6cs.PL
|
A divide and conquer method for symbolic regression ✩
Changtong Luoa,∗, Chen Chena,b , Zonglin Jianga,b
arXiv:1705.08061v2 [cs.NE] 27 Jun 2017
a
State Key Laboratory of High Temperature Gas Dynamics, Institute of Mechanics,
Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
b
School of Engineering Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,
Beijing, 100049, China
Abstract
Symbolic regression aims to find a function that best explains the relationship between independent variables and the objective value based on a given
set of sample data. Genetic programming (GP) is usually considered as an
appropriate method for the problem since it can optimize functional structure and coefficients simultaneously. However, the convergence speed of GP
might be too slow for large scale problems that involve a large number of
variables. Fortunately, in many applications, the target function is separable
or partially separable. This feature motivated us to develop a new method,
divide and conquer (D&C), for symbolic regression, in which the target function is divided into a number of sub-functions and the sub-functions are then
determined by any of a GP algorithm. The separability is probed by a new
proposed technique, Bi-Correlation test (BiCT). D&C powered GP has been
tested on some real-world applications, and the study shows that D&C can
help GP to get the target function much more rapidly.
Keywords: Mathematical modeling, Genetic programming, Symbolic
regression, Artificial intelligence, Divide and conquer
This work has been supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China
(Grant No. 11532014).
∗
Corresponding author
Email addresses: [email protected] (Changtong Luo), [email protected]
(Chen Chen), [email protected] (Zonglin Jiang)
✩
Preprint submitted to Expert Systems with Applications
June 28, 2017
1. Introduction
Symbolic regression (SR) is a data-driven modeling method which aims to
find a function that best explains the relationship between independent variables and the objective value based on a given set of sample data (Schmidt and Lipson,
2009). Genetic programming (GP) is usually considered as a good candidate for SR since it does not impose a priori assumptions and can optimize
function structure and coefficients simultaneously. However, the convergence
speed of GP might be too slow for large scale problems that involve a large
number of variables.
Many efforts have been devoted trying to improve the original GP (Koza,
2008) in several ways. Some works suggest replacing its tree-based method,
with an integer string (Grammar Evolution) (O’Neill and Ryan, 2001), or
a parse matrix (Parse-Matrix Evolution) (Luo and Zhang, 2012). These
techniques can simplify the coding and decoding process but help little on
improving the convergence speed. Some other works suggest confining its
search space to generalized linear space, for example, Fast Function eXtraction (McConaghy, 2011), and Elite Bases Regression (Chen et al., 2017).
These techniques can accelerate the convergence speed of GP, even by orders
of magnitude. However, the speed is gained at the sacrifice of losing the
generality, that is, the result might be only a linear approximation of the
target function.
Fortunately, in many applications, the target function is separable or
partially separable (see section 2 for definitions). For example, in gas dynamics (Anderson, 2006), the heat flux coefficient St of a flat plate could be
formulated as
p
p
St = 2.274 sin(θ) cos(θ)/ Rex ,
(1)
and the heat flux qs at the stagnation point of a sphere as
p
qs = 1.83 × 10−4 v 3 ρ/R(1 − hw /hs ).
(2)
In equation (1), the two independent variables, θ and Rex , are both separable.
In equation (2), the first three variables v, ρ, and R are all separable, and
the last two variables, hw and hs , are not separable, but their combination
(hw , hs ) is separable. The function in equation (2) is considered partially
separable in this paper.
The feature of separability will be used in this paper to accelerate the
optimization process of symbolic regression. Some basic concepts on function separability are defined in Section 2. Section 3 describes the overall
2
work flow of the proposed method, divide and conquer. Section 4 presents
a special technique, bi-correlation test (BiCT), to determine the separability
of a function. Numerical results are given in Section 5, and the concluding
remarks are drawn in Section 6.
2. Basic concepts
The proposed method in this paper is based on a new concept referred to
as partial separability. It has something in common with existing separability
definitions such as reference (Berenguel et al., 2013) and (d’Avezac et al.,
2011), but is not exactly the same. To make it clear and easy to understand,
we begin with some illustrative examples. The functions as follows could all
be regarded as partially separable:
z = 0.8 + 0.6 ∗ ( u2 + cos(u) ) + sin(v + w) ∗ (v − w) ;
(3)
z = 0.8 + 0.6 ∗ ( u2 + cos(u) ) − sin(v + w) ∗ (v − w) ;
(4)
z = 0.8 + 0.6 ∗ ( u2 + cos(u) ) ∗ sin(v + w) ∗ (v − w) ;
(5)
where the boxed frames are used to indicate sub-functions, u is separable with
respect to z, while v and w themselves are not separable, but their combination (v, w) is considered separable. A simple example of non-separable
function is f (x) = sin(x1 + x2 + x3 ).
More precisely, the separability could be defined as follows.
Definition 1. A scalar function with n continuous variables f (x) (f : Rn 7→
R, x ∈ Rn ) is said to be partially separable if and only if it can be rewritten
as
f (x) = c0 ⊗1 ϕ1 (I1 x) ⊗2 ϕ2 (I2 x) ⊗3 · · · ⊗m ϕm (Im x)
(6)
where the binary operator ⊗i could be plus (+), minus (−), times(×). Ii is a
sub-matrix of the identity matrix, and Ii ∈ Rni ×n . The set { I1 , I2 , · · · , Im }
m
P
is a partition of the identity matrix I ∈ Rn×n ,
ni = n. The sub-function
i=1
ϕi is a scalar function such that ϕi : Rni 7→ R. Otherwise the function is
said to be non-separable.
3
In this definition, the binary operator, division (/), is not included in ⊗
for simplicity. However, this does not affect much of its generality, since the
sub-functions are not preset, and can be transformed as ϕ̃i (·)= 1/ϕi (·) if only
ϕi (·) 6= 0.
A special case is that all variables are separable, which could be defined
as follows.
Definition 2. A scalar function with n continuous variables f (x) (f : Rn 7→
R, x ∈ Rn ) is said to be completely separable if and only if it can be rewritten
as equation (6) and ni = 1 for all i = 1, 2, · · · , m.
3. Divide and conquer method
As above mentioned, many practical problems have the feature of separability. To make use of this feature to accelerate the optimization process of
genetic programming, a new method, divide and conquer (D&C), is proposed.
It works as follows.
First, a separability detection process is carried out to find out whether
the concerned problem is separable (at least partial separable) or not. The
variables are identified one by one, and then their combinations. Once it (or
the variable combination) is identified as separable, a sub-function ϕi (xi ) (or
ϕi (Ii x) for variable combinations) will be assigned. In this way, the structure
of target function f (x) could be divided into a set of sub-functions based on
the separability information: ϕi (Ii x), i = 1, 2, · · · , m.
Then, the sub-functions ϕi (Ii x) (i = 1, 2, · · · , m) are optimized and
determined one by one, using any of genetic programming algorithms, including classical GP, Grammatical Evolution (O’Neill and Ryan, 2001) and
Parse-Matrix Evolution (Luo and Zhang, 2012). When optimizing one subfunction, variables not involved ((I − Ii )x) are fixed as constants. That is,
only a small number of variables (Ii x, which is only a subset of {x1 , x2 , · · · , xn })
need be considered. This means the sub-function determination should be
much easier than evolving the target function f (x) directly.
For example, in Equation (3), Equation (4), or Equation (5), the
sub-function ϕ1 (u) = u2 + cos(u) (or ϕ2 (v, w) = sin(v + w) ∗ (v − w)) has
less number of variables and complexity than the original function.
Thus, optimizing them one by one is much easier for GP.
Finally, these sub-functions are properly combined to form the target
function, which is referred to as a function recover process. This process
4
Separability Detection
Function Division
Sub−Function Determination
Function Recover
Figure 1: Work flow of divide and conquer for symbolic regression
is rather simple, and all traditional regression algorithms are qualified to
accomplish this mission.
The work flow of D&C could be described in Figure 1.
4. Bi-correlation test
4.1. Description
The main idea of the proposed divide and conquer (D&C) method is to
make use of the separability feature to simplify the search process. Therefore,
the most important and fundamental step (the separability detection process
in Fig. 1) is to determine whether the concerned problem is separable (at
least partial separable) or not. To fulfill this task, a special technique, Bicorrelation test (BiCT), is provided in this section.
Consider independent variables x1 , x2 , · · · , xn and the dependent f as
n+1 random variables, and the known data as sample points. Recall that
the linear relation and correlation coefficient of two random variables has the
following relations.
Lemma 1. The two random variables ξ and η are linearly related with correlation coefficient 1 (i.e., ρξη = 1) if and only if there exists two constants
a, b (b 6= 0), such that P {η = a + bξ} = 1.
The correlation coefficient ρ could be estimated by the sample correlation
5
coefficient r, which is defined as follows.
N
¯ (ηi − η̄)
1 X (ξi − ξ)
r=
·
n − 1 i=1
σξ
ση
P
where N is the number of observations in the sample set,
is the summation
¯
symbol, ξi is the ξ value for observation i, ξ is the sample mean of ξ, ηi is
the η value for observation i, η̄ is the sample mean of η, σξ is the sample
standard deviation of ξ, and ση is the sample standard deviation of η.
Only continuous model functions are considered in this paper. As a result,
the conclusion of Lemma 1 could be simplified as follows.
• The two random variables f A and f B are linearly related (f B = a +
bf A ) if and only if the sample correlation coefficient r = 1 for any given
sample set.
Studies shows that the functional separability defined in the above section (See equation 6) could be observed with random sampling and linear
correlation techniques.
Without the loss of generality, a simple function with three variables
(f (x) = f (x1 , x2 , x3 ), xi ∈ [ai , bi ], i = 1, 2, 3) is considered to illustrate the
implementation of the bi-correlation test. To find out whether the first variable x1 is separable, two correlation tests are needed.
The first correlation test is carried out as follows. A set of random sample points in [a1 , b1 ] are generated, then these points are extended to three
dimensional space with the rest variables (x2 and x3 ) fixed to a point A. We
get a vector of function values f (A) = f (x1 , A) = (f1A , f2A , · · · , fNA ), where
N is the number of sample points. Then these points are extended to three
dimensional space with fixed x2 and x3 to another point B, We get another
vector f (B) = f (x1 , B) = (f1B , f2B , · · · , fNB ). It is obviously that the two
vectors f (A) and f (B) will be linearly related if x1 is separable. However, it
is easy to show that this linear relation could NOT ensure its separability.
Then it comes to the second correlation test. Another set of random
sample points in [a2 , b2 ]×[a3 , b3 ] are generated, then these points are extended
to three dimensional space with the rest variable(s) (x1 in this case) fixed to
a point C, and get a vector f (C) = f (C, x2 , x3 ). Similarly, another vector
f (D) = f (D, x2 , x3 ) is obtained. Again, the two vectors f (C) and f (D) needs
to be linearly related to ensure the separability of x1 .
6
4.2. Proposition
Without the loss of generality, suppose we have a scalar function f (x)
with n continuous variables (f : Rn 7→ R, x ∈ Ω ⊂ Rn , and Ω = [a1 , b1 ] ×
[a2 , b2 ] × · · · × [an , bn ]), and need to find out whether the first m variable
combination (x1 , x2 , · · · , xm ) are separable. Let the matrix X1 be a set of N
random sample points from the subset [a1 , b1 ] × [a2 , b2 ] × · · · × [am , bm ] ⊂ Rm ,
and
(1)
(1)
(1)
x1
x2
· · · xm
(2)
(2)
(2)
x
x2
· · · xm
X1 = 1
.
··· ··· ··· ···
(N )
(N )
(N )
x1
x2
· · · xm
The rest variables xm+1 , xm+2 , · · · , xn are fixed to two given points A and
B in the subset [am+1 , bm+1 ] × [am+2 , bm+2 ] × · · · × [an , bn ] ⊂ Rn−m , i.e.,
(A)
(B)
(B)
(B)
xA = (xm+1 (A) , xm+2 (A) ,
··· ,x
n ), xB = (xm+1 , xm+2 , · · · , xn ).
1
xm+1 (A) xm+2 (A) · · · xn (A)
1
xm+1 (A) xm+2 (A) · · · xn (A)
, and
Let the matrix X2 (A) = xA =
···
···
··· ···
· · ·
xm+1 (A) xm+2 (A) · · · xn (A)
1
1
1
X2 (B) = xB .
· · ·
1
Let the extended matrix XA = X1 X2 (A) , and XB = X1 X2 (B) .
Let f A be the vector of which the i-th element is the function value of
the i-th row of matrix XA , i.e., f A = f (XA ), and f B is similarly defined,
f B = f (XB ).
Lemma 2. The two vectors f A and f B are linearly related if the function
f (x) is separable with respect to the first m variable combination (x1 , x2 , · · · , xm ).
Proof. Since the first m variable combination (x1 , x2 , · · · , xm ) are separable,
from definition 1, we have f (x) = ϕ1 (x1 , x2 , · · · , xm )⊗ϕ2 (xm+1 , xm+2 , · · · , xn ).
Accordingly, the vector f A = f (XA ) = ϕ1 (X1 ) ⊗ ϕ2 (X2A ) = ϕ1 (X1 ) ⊗ kA ,
where ⊗ is a component-wise binary operation, and kA = ϕ2 (xA ) is a scalar.
7
Similarly, the vector f B = ϕ1 (X1 ) ⊗ kB . As a result,
if ⊗ is times
kA /kB · f B
fA =
kA − kB + f B if ⊗ is plus
kB − kA + f B if ⊗ is minus
which means the two vectors f A and f B are linearly related.
On the other hand, if the first m variables are fixed to two given points
C and D, and the rest of n − m variables are randomly sampled. A similar
proposition
could
be concluded as follows. Let
1
x1 (C) x2 (C) · · · xm (C)
1
x1 (C) x2 (C) · · · xm (C)
,
X1 (C) = x1 (C) x2 (C) · · · xm (C) =
···
··· ···
···
· · ·
x1 (C) x2 (C) · · · xm (C)
1
1
1
X1 (D) = x1 (D) x2 (D) · · · xm (D) ,
· · ·
1
(1)
(1)
(1)
xm+1 xm+2 · · · xn
(2)
(2)
xm+1 x(2)
· · · xn
m+2
X2 =
, the N × n matrix XC = X1 (C) X2 ,
··· ··· ···
···
(N )
(N )
(N )
xm+1 xm+2 · · · xn
and XD = X1 (D) X2 . Let f C be the vector of which the i-th element is
the function value of the i-th row of matrix XC , i.e., f C = f (XC ), and f D
is similarly defined, f D = f (XD ).
Lemma 3. The two vectors f C and f D are linearly related if the function
f (x) is separable with respect to the first m variable combination (x1 , x2 , · · · , xm ).
Proof. Since the first m variable combination (x1 , x2 , · · · , xm ) are separable,
from definition 1, we have f (x) = ϕ1 (x1 , x2 , · · · , xm )⊗ϕ2 (xm+1 , xm+2 , · · · , xn ).
Accordingly, the vector f C = f (XC ) = ϕ1 (X1C ) ⊗ ϕ2 (X2 ) = kC ⊗ ϕ2 (X2 ),
where ⊗ is a component-wise binary operation, and the scalar kC = ϕ1 (xC ).
Similarly, the vector f D = kD ⊗ ϕ2 (X2 ). As a result,
kC /kD · f D
if ⊗ is times
fC =
kC − kD + f D if ⊗ is plus or minus
which means the two vectors f C and f D are linearly related.
8
The above lemmas show that two function-value vectors must be linearly
related if the target function has the separability feature, while the separable
variables (or their complement variables) are fixed. These are necessary
conditions for the separability identification of target function. The sufficient
and necessary conditions are given as follows.
Theorem 1. The function f (x) is separable with respect to the first m variable combination (x1 , x2 , · · · , xm ) if and only if both of the flowing statements
are true.
(1) Any two function-value vectors with fixed (x1 , x2 , · · · , xm ) are linearly related;
(2) Any two function-value vectors with fixed (xm+1 , xm+2 , · · · , xn ) are linearly related.
Proof. From Lemma 2, and Lemma 3, we can conclude that the necessary
conditions of the theorem hold. The sufficient conditions can be proved by
contradiction. Suppose the separable form f (x) = ϕ1 (x1 , x2 , · · · , xm ) ⊗
ϕ2 (xm+1 , xm+2 · · · , xn ) can not be derived from the above two conditions.
Thus, there is at least one non-separable variable presented in both subfunctions, ϕ1 and ϕ2 . Without loss of generality, we assume xm to be this
non-separable variable. That is,
f (x) = ϕ1 (x1 , x2 , · · · , xm ) ⊗ ϕ2 (xm , xm+1 , xm+2 · · · , xn ) .
(7)
Similarly, the process of sampling for the first correlation test can be given
as
(1)
(1)
(1)
x1
x2
· · · xm
x(2) x(2) · · · x(2)
m
2
,
(8)
X1 = 1.
.
..
..
..
.
(N )
(N )
(N )
x1
x2
· · · xm
(1)
(A)
(A)
(A)
xm xm+1 xm+2 · · · xn
x(2) x(A) x(A) · · · x(A)
m
m
(A)
m+1
m+2
X̃2 = .
,
(9)
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
(N )
xm
(A)
(A)
(A)
xm+1 xm+2 · · · xm
9
and
(B)
(B)
(B)
xm+1 xm+2 · · · xn
(B)
(B)
(B)
xm+1 xm+2 · · · xm
(B)
(10)
X̃2 =
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
(N )
(B)
(B)
(B)
xm xm+1 xm+2 · · · xm
h
i
h
i
(A)
(B)
′
′
Let the extended matrix XA = X1 X̃2
, and XB = X1 X̃2
.
Thus,
(A)
f ′A = f (X ′ A ) = ϕ1 (X1 ) ⊗ ϕ2 X̃2
= ϕ1 (X1 ) ⊗ α,
(11)
(1)
xm
(2)
xm
..
.
and
f ′B
′
= f (X B ) = ϕ1 (X1 ) ⊗ ϕ2
(B)
X̃2
= ϕ1 (X1 ) ⊗ β
(12)
(A)
and
are defined, where α and β are function-value vectors of ϕ2 X̃2
(B)
ϕ2 X̃2
respectively. As a result,
f ′A
′
γ·f B
α − β + f ′B
=
β − α + f ′B
if ⊗ is times
if ⊗ is plus
if ⊗ is minus
(13)
where γ = (α1 /β1 , α2 /β2 , · · · , αN /βN ). From the lemmas, we know that, two
vectors f ′A and f ′ B are linearly related if they are in the relation of f ′A =
k1 ·f ′ B +k2 , where k1 and k2 are constant scalars, k1 6= 0. But, from the above
discussion, the components of all the three vectors, γ, α − β and β − α, are
(1)
(2)
(N )
not constant, due to the randomness of sample points xm , xm , · · · , xm .
This contradicts the supposition that the two vectors f ′A and f ′ B are linearly
related, and so Equation (7) cannot hold.
4.3. Notes on BiCT
The proposed technique is called bi-correlation test (BiCT) since two
complementary correlation tests are simultaneously carried out to determine
whether a variable or a variable-combination is separable.
The above process is illustrated with two sub-functions, and it could be
extended to determine the separability of a function with more sub-functions.
However, if the binary operators ⊗1 , ⊗2 , · · · , ⊗m in equation (6) are mutually
different with mixed times and plus or minus, the extension might be a little
10
difficult. This issue will be left for the future work. Hereafter, we assume
that the binary operators in equation (6) are the same, i.e, ⊗i = times or
⊗i = plus or minus for all i = 1, 2, · · · , m, for simplicity. In this case, the
extension process is very easy and omitted here.
To enhance the stability and efficiency of the algorithm, the distribution
of sample points should be as uniform as possible. Therefore, controlled sampling methods such as Latin hypercube sampling (Beachkofski and Grandhi,
2002) and orthogonal sampling (Steinberg and Lin, 2006) are preferred for
sample generation.
For the correlation test, any of correlation methods could be used. That
is, Pearson’s r method, Spearman’s rank order correlation, and Kendall’s τ
correlation are all effective for BiCT.
Take the function f (x) = 0.8 + 0.6 ∗ (x21 + cos(x1 )) ∗ sin(x2 + x3 ) ∗ (x2 −
x3 ), x ∈ [−3, 3]3 , as an example, the first sample set consists of 13 uniformly distributed points in [−3, 3], and the second sample set consists of
169 uniformly distributed points in [−3, 3]2 . The correlation tests could be
illustrated as in Fig. 2. As can be seen that the function-value vectors f A
and f B are linearly related (Fig. 2(b)), in which the variable x2 and x3 are
fixed when considering the first variable x1 (Fig. 2(a)). Similarly, to find
out the separability of variable combination (x2 , x3 ), the first variable x1 is
fixed (Fig. 2(c)). The corresponding function-value vectors f C and f D are
linearly related (Fig. 2(d))
The D&C method with BiCT technique is described with functions of
explicit expressions. While in practical applications, no explicit expression is
available. In this case, some modifications need to adapt for D&C method.
In fact, for data-driven modeling problems, a surrogate model of black-box
type could be established as the underlying target function (Forrester et al.,
2008) in advance. Then the rest steps are the same as above discussions.
5. Numerical results
5.1. Analysis on Computing time
The computing time (t) of a genetic programming with the proposed
divide and conquer (D&C) method consists three parts:
t = t1 + t2 + t3
(14)
where t1 is for the separability detection, t2 for sub-function determination,
and t3 for function recover. Note that both the separability detection and
11
6
A
1
f
B
4
f
0
−1
f
B
0
−2
−2
−3
−4
−4
−2
−1
0
x1
1
2
−5
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
fA
(b) f A ↔ f B
(a) (x2 , x3 ) are fixed
150
100
50
D
−6
−3
f
f
2
0
−50
−100
−150
−100
−50
0
C
f
(d) f C ↔ f D
(c) x1 are fixed
Figure 2: Demo of separability detection process of BiCT
12
50
100
Table 1: A mapping table for parse-matrix evolution
a·1
T
a·2 , a·3
expr
a·4
f → fk
-5
√
·
-5
λ2
-1
skip
-4
ln
-4
λ1
0
f1
-3 -2
cos /
-3 -2
f f2
1
f2
-1
-1
f1
0
skip
0
1.0
1
+
1
x1
2
*
2
x2
3
sin
···
···
4
exp
d
xd
5
(·)2
function recover processes are double-precision operations and thus cost much
less time than the sub-function determination process. That is, t ≈ t2 .
It is obviously that the CPU time for determining all sub-functions (t2 )
is much less than that of determining the target function directly (td ). Next,
a typical genetic programming, parse matrix evolution (PME), is taken as
the optimization driver (other GP algorithms should also work) to show the
performance of D&C.
Suppose that the dimension of the target function is d, the height of
the parse-matrix h, and the mapping Table as in Table 1, then the parsematrix entries a·1 ∈ −5, −4, ..., 4, 5, a·j ∈ −5, −4, · · · , d, (j = 1, 2), and
a·4 ∈ −1, 0, 1. Thus the parse-matrix (aij )h×4 have as many as (11 ∗ (6 + d) ∗
(6 + d) ∗ 3)h possible combinations. Thus the CPU time of determining the
target function directly satisfies
td ∼ (11 ∗ (6 + d) ∗ (6 + d) ∗ 3)h .
(15)
This means that the searching time of determining a target function will
increase exponentially with model complexity. Using D&C, only the subfunctions are needed to determinate, and each sub-function has less dimension d and less complexity h. Therefore, it will cost much less CPU time.
In fact, by D&C powered GP, the CPU time will increase only linearly with
dimensions, provided that the target function is completely separable.
Take equation (2) in Section 1 as an example. Without D&C, to search
directly, the control parameters of PME should be set as follows: d = 5,
h ≥ 9. From equation (15), the order of required CPU time td = O(2.58·1032).
Using D&C powered PME, the required CPU time will be much less.
In fact, after the separation detection, the function is divided into for subfunctions as follows.
√
√
qs = 1.83 × 10−4 v 3 · ρ · 1/ R · (1 − hw /hs )
13
√
For the sub-function v 3 , 1/ R, and 1 − hw /hs , the control parameters of
√
PME should be set as d = 1, h ≥ 2. For the sub-function ρ, d = 1, h ≥ 1.
As a result, t2 ≈ 4∗O(2.61·106) = O(107) by equation (15), which means the
D&C method could reduce the computational effort by orders of magnitude.
5.2. Program timing
Next, two illustrative examples are presented to show how much time the
D&C technique could save in practical applications.
Again, equation (1) and equation (2) are set as the target function, respectively. For equation (1), the sample set consists 100 observations uniformly distributed in [1,10] degree and [1000, 10000] (i.e., θ=1:10; Rex =
1000:1000:10000). The angle θ is fixed to 5 degree while detecting the subfunction f1 (Rex ), and the Renold number Rex is fixed to 5000 while detecting
the sub-function f2 (θ).
For equation (2), the sample set consists 30000 observations uniformly
distributed in a box in R5 (i.e., v = 500 : 100 : 1000; ρ = 0.0001 : 0.0001 :
0.001; R = 0.01 : 0.01 : 0.1; hw = 10000 : 10000 : 50000; hs = 100000 :
100000 : 1000000). The velocity of free-stream v, density of air ρ, radius of
nose R, Wall enthalpy hw , and total enthalpy hs are fixed to 800 m/s2 , 0.0005
kg/m3 , 0.05 m, 20000 J/kg, and 200000 J/kg, respectively, while detecting
the sub-functions.
In both tests, the program stops when the current model is believed good
can be regarded as the
enough: 1 − R2 < 1.0 · 10−10 , where R2 = 1 − SSE
SST
fraction of the total sum of squares that has ‘explained by’ the model. To
suppress the affect of randomness of PME, 10 runs are carried out for each
target function, and the averaged CPU time on a PC using a single CPU
core (Intel(R) Core (TM) i7-4790 CPU @3.60GHz) is recorded to show its
performance. The test results (see Table 2, and Table 3) show that D&C
technique can save CPU time remarkably. For equation (1), PME needs
about 12 minutes and 26 seconds to get an alternative of the target function
without D&C technique, while the D&C powered PME needs only about 11.2
seconds, which is much faster than the original algorithm. Similar conclusion
could also seen from the test results of equation (2) (see Table 3). Note that
the total time of D&C powered PME includes t1 , t2 and t3 (See Equ. 14),
and t1 + t3 ≈ 0.2 for Equ. (1), 0.3 for Equ. (2).
14
Table 2: Performance of PME on detecting Equ. (1) (with and without D&C)
Target Function CPU time
For D&C powered PME
f1 (Rex )
3s
f2 (θ)
8s∗
Total time
11.2s
PME without D&C
f (Rex , θ)
12m26s∗
Total time
746s
Result Expression
√
St = 0.1978/ Rex
St = 0.03215 ∗ θ − 0.01319 ∗ θ3
√
St = 2.274 ∗ θ ∗ cos(0.9116 ∗ θ)/ Rex
PME failed to get the exact result, but always result in an alternative
function with fitting error of zero in double precision (i.e., 1 − R2 = 0.0).
∗
Table 3: Performance of PME on detecting target Equ. (2)(with and without D&C)
Target Function CPU time
For D&C powered PME
f1 (v)
3s
f2 (ρ)
2s
f3 (R)
4s
f4 (hw , hs )
9s
Total time
18.3s
PME without D&C
f (v, ρ, R, hw, hs) 85m43s
Total time
5143s
Result Expression
qs
qs
qs
qs
= 1.647 · 10−5 ∗ v 3
√
= 3.77 · 105 ∗ pρ
= 6.49 · 103 ∗ 0.08442/R
= 9370 − 9370 ∗ hw /hs
qs = 0.000183 ∗ v 3 ∗
15
p
ρ/R ∗ (1 − hw /hs )
6. Conclusion
The divide and conquer (D&C) method for symbolic regression has been
presented. The main idea is to make use of the separability feature of the
underling target function to simplify the search process. In D&C, the target
function is divided into a number of sub-functions based on the information
of separability detection, and the sub-functions are then determined by any
of a genetic programming (GP) algorithms.
The most important and fundamental step in D&C is to identify the
separability feather of the concerned system. To fulfill this task, a special
algorithm, bi-correlation test (BiCT), is also provided for separability detection in this paper.
The study shows that D&C can accelerate the convergence speed of GP
by orders of magnitude without losing the generality, provided that the target
function has the feature of separability, which is usually the case in practical
engineering applications.
References
References
Anderson, J., 2006. Hypersonic and High-Temperature Gas Dynamics (2nd
ed.). American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., Virginia.
Beachkofski, B., Grandhi, R., APRL 2002. Improved distributed hypercube
sampling. In: 43rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural
Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Structures, Structural Dynamics,
and Materials and Co-located Conferences. AIAA paper no. 2002-1274.
Denver, Colorado.
URL https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2002-1274
Berenguel, L., Casado, L. G., Garca, I., Hendrix, E. M. T., Messine, F.,
2013. On interval branch-and-bound for additively separable functions with
common variables. Journal of Global Optimization 56 (3), 1101–1121.
Chen, C., Luo, C., Jiang, Z., 2017. Elite bases regression: A real-time algorithm for symbolic regression.
URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.07313
16
d’Avezac, M., Botts, R., Mohlenkamp, M. J., Zunger, A., 2011. Learning
to predict physical properties using sums of separable functions. SIAM
Journal on Scientific Computing 33 (6), 3381–3401.
Forrester, A., Sobester, A., Keane, A., 2008. Engineering design via surrogate
modelling: a practical guide. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey.
Koza, J. R., 2008. Genetic programming: on the programming of computers
by means of natural selection. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Luo, C., Zhang, S.-L., 2012. Parse-matrix evolution for symbolic regression.
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 25 (6), 1182–1193.
McConaghy, T., 2011. FFX: Fast, Scalable, Deterministic Symbolic Regression Technology. Springer New York, New York, NY, pp. 235–260.
O’Neill, M., Ryan, C., Aug. 2001. Grammatical evolution. IEEE Trans. Evol.
Comp 5 (4), 349–358.
URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/4235.942529
Schmidt, M., Lipson, H., 2009. Distilling free-form natural laws from experimental data. Science 324 (59236), 81–85.
Steinberg, D. M., Lin, D. K. J., 2006. A construction method for orthogonal
latin hypercube designs. Biometrika 93 (2), 279–288.
17
| 9cs.NE
|
arXiv:1110.1708v1 [cs.CE] 8 Oct 2011
Advancing Nuclear Physics Through TOPS Solvers
and Tools
E Ng1 , J Sarich2 , S M Wild2 , T Munson2 , H Aktulga1 , C Yang1 ,
P Maris3 , J P Vary3 , N Schunck4 , M G Bertolli5 , M Kortelainen5,6 ,
W Nazarewicz5,6 , T Papenbrock5,6 , M V Stoitsov5,6
1
2
3
4
5
6
Computational Research Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
Mathematics and Computer Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439, USA
Department of Physics, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA
Physics Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94551, USA
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA
Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA
E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract. At the heart of many scientific applications is the solution of algebraic systems,
such as linear systems of equations, eigenvalue problems, and optimization problems, to name
a few. TOPS, which stands for Towards Optimal Petascale Simulations, is a SciDAC applied
math center focused on the development of solvers for tackling these algebraic systems, as well
as the deployment of such technologies in large-scale scientific applications of interest to the
U.S. Department of Energy. In this paper, we highlight some of the solver technologies we have
developed in optimization and matrix computations. We also describe some accomplishments
achieved using these technologies in UNEDF, a SciDAC application project on nuclear physics.
1. Introduction
Over the last couple of decades, simulation science has become as important as theoretical
and experimental science. The success of simulation science hinges on the ability to perform
the calculations efficiently. The inner most kernel in these calculations is often the solution
of algebraic systems, including, but not limited to, systems of linear and nonlinear equations,
eigenvalue problems, optimization problems, and sensitivity analysis. TOPS, which stands for
Towards Optimal Petascale Simulations, is a multi-institutional SciDAC applied math center
that focuses on the development of solvers for tackling these algebraic systems, as well as the
deployment of such technologies in large-scale scientific applications, particularly those of interest
to the U.S. Department of Energy.
In this paper, we highlight two specific areas of TOPS: eigenvalue calculations and
optimization.
In particular, we highlight some accomplishments we have achieved in
collaboration with computational physicists in UNEDF. The goal of the UNEDF SciDAC
application project [1] is to obtain a comprehensive understanding of nuclei and their reactions
based on the most accurate knowledge of the strong nuclear interaction. Eigenvalue calculations
come up in the solution of the nuclear Schrödinger equation [2, 3]. The eigenvalues and the
eigenvectors correspond to the energy states and wave functions. Numerical optimization
techniques are needed in building the next generation of nuclear energy functionals, which will
provide nuclear physicists better tools for predicting the properties and behavior of atomic nuclei
over the entire nuclear table.
2. Eigenvalue Calculations
In nuclear configuration interaction calculation, it is sometimes necessary to investigate, among
others, nuclear level densities as a function of the total angular momentum J and excitation
energy, and to evaluate scattering amplitudes as a function of J [4]. We will refer to this as a
total-J calculation in this paper. In this type of calculation, we are interested in computing a
relatively large number of states with a prescribed J value.
One brute-force approach to a total-J calculation is to simply compute a large number of
eigenvalues and wave functions of a nuclear many-body Hamiltonian, for example in an Mscheme basis (good angular momentum projection along the z-axis), and select, among these
wave functions, the ones that have a prescribed J value. This approach is appropriate when
the number of desired energy states and wave functions is small (e.g., ten to twenty states).
When that is not true, or when certain properties of a nucleus pertaining to a fixed J are
to be calculated, the brute-force approach may require computing a very large number of
wave functions, and the computational cost for performing this type of calculation may be
prohibitively high. Furthermore, even if we can afford to perform this type of calculation, this
may not be an efficient use of resources because we compute a large number of wave functions
only to throw away most of them because they do not have the desired J value.
We have developed an alternative approach where we construct an invariant subspace Z
that contains all wave functions associated with a fixed J value in advance and project the
nuclear many-body Hamiltonian into this subspace to produce a projected Hamiltonian with the
minimum dimension consistent with that chosen J. A sparse matrix diagonalization procedure
[5, 6, 7] is then applied to this projected Hamiltonian to obtain the desired energy states and
their corresponding wave functions.
To construct Z, we need to work with the total angular momentum square operator Jˆ2 and
compute the null space of Jˆ2 − λI, where λ = J(J + 1) is a known eigenvalue of Jˆ2 .
When the many-body basis states associated with the configuration space are properly
ordered and grouped, Jˆ2 becomes block diagonal: Jˆ2 = diag(Jˆ12 , Jˆ22 , ..., Jˆn2g ). Therefore, the
task of computing the desired null space of Jˆ2 − λI reduces to that of computing the desired
null spaces of Jˆi2 − λI, for i = 1, 2, ..., ng .
However, because the dimensions of the Jˆi2 ’s vary over a wide range (e.g., from 1 to more
than 36,000 for 12 C, Nmax = 6), it is difficult to maintain a good load balance in the null space
calculation. Here, Nmax is a parameter limiting the total number of oscillator quanta allowed
in the many-body states.
We developed a multi-level task and data distribution scheme to achieve optimal parallel
performance in the null space calculation by
(i) Limiting the granularity of the parallelism; that is, we try to divide the overall task into many small
tasks of limited sizes so that good load balance arises from distributing these small tasks evenly
among different processors.
(ii) Limiting the communication overhead incurred in the null space calculation so that the overall time
of the computation can be minimized.
To achieve these inherently conflicting goals, we classified Jˆi2 blocks into small, medium
and large groups based on the estimated computational loads associated with computing the
desired null space of Jˆi2 − λI, and the estimated ratio of communication volume to floating point
operations count.
The small Jˆi2 blocks are distributed among all processors based on their computational load
by a greedy algorithm. The null spaces of these matrices are computed by a sequential LAPACK
rank-revealing QR subroutine. No communication is involved in these calculations. Each one
of the medium-sized Jˆi2 blocks is assigned to a subgroup of processors by the same greedy
algorithm. The null space calculation for such a block is parallelized among processors within
the same subgroup, which will incur some communication overhead. Finally, the desired null
space calculation for a large Jˆi2 block is carried out in parallel on all processors.
We implemented three different algorithms for computing the null space of Jˆi2 −λI for medium
and large blocks.
(i) Randomized rank-revealing QR (RQR). The algorithm performs two standard QR factorizations of
dense matrices without pivoting. Although we do not take advantage of the sparsity of Jˆi2 in this
approach, it is more efficient than other approaches when the dimension of the desired null space is
relatively large (e.g. larger than 10% of the dimension of Jˆi2 ).
(ii) Shift-invert Lanczos (SIL), which requires solutions of sparse linear systems.
(iii) Polynomial accelerated subspace iteration (PASI). We apply a standard subspace iteration [8] to the
matrix p(Jˆi2 ), where p(ω) is a polynomial that assumes the value of 1 at ω = λ, and has a much
smaller magnitude (than 1) in other parts of the spectrum of Jˆi2 .
Table 1 shows that our load balance scheme is much better than a brute-force approach of
distributing Jˆi2 in a cyclic fashion to different processors. Table 2 shows that PASI is more
efficient when J=0. The randomized QR algorithm appears to be more efficient for larger J
values. However, when J becomes very large, which typically results in smaller dimension of the
null space, PASI becomes more efficient again.
Table 1. A comparison between the greedy load
balancing algorithm with a parallel algorithm
based on a cyclic distribution of Jˆi2 blocks in
terms of wall clock time (in seconds). (np is the
number of processors.)
core
6 Li
12 C
12 C
6 Li
12 C
12 C
Nmax
12
4
6
12
4
6
alg
PASI
PASI
PASI
RQR
RQR
RQR
np
120
120
496
120
120
496
time (secs)
cyclic greedy
131
132
6.1
5.2
608
295
233
193
18.7
17.0
1220
900
Table 2. RQR decomposition vs PASI for
different J values. Both methods use the
greedy load balancing technique. Times are
in seconds.
core
6 Li
6 Li
6 Li
12 C
12 C
12 C
(Nmax ,J)
(12, 0)
(12, 1)
(12, 12)
(6, 0)
(6, 1)
(6, 12)
np
120
120
496
496
496
496
time (secs)
RQR
PASI
193
132
195
464
140
95
900
295
890 > 1, 800
840
105
3. Optimization
Optimization plays a central role in the building of next-generation nuclear energy functionals,
including functionals based on density functional theory (DFT) and/or ab initio calculations.
In the case of DFT-based functionals, for example, a primary computational bottleneck is
determining parameter values so that the functional agrees with data on a set of observables
such as binding energies, radii, and odd-even staggering [9]. Mathematically, we need to solve
the optimization problem
(
)
o
X
di − s(θi ; x) 2
min f (x) =
: lj ≤ xj ≤ uj , j = 1, . . . , n ,
(1)
x
σi
i=1
4
10
POUNDER
POUNDER warm
POUNDERS
POUNDERS warm
−9
10
3
Relative Noise
Best f value found
10
2
10
−11
10
−13
10
1
10
200
400
600
800
1000
Number of Evaluations
1200
1400
Figure 1. Exploiting structure in parameter estimation problems substantially reduces the number of required simulation
evaluations.
50
100
150
200
250
Mass Number, A=N+Z
Figure 2. Quantifying the computational
noise for a deterministic simulator across
2,049 nuclei.
where n parameter values must be determined from a set of data of o observables. Challenges
in solving this problem include the computational expense of, and the noise resulting from, the
iterative calculations performed when simulating the theoretical observable s(θi ; x), and the fact
that derivatives of some simulated observables with respect to certain parameters xj may not
be available (or even exist) for use by an optimization algorithm.
As part of SciDAC efforts, we have developed POUNDERS (Practical Optimization Using
No DERivatives for Sums of squares), an algorithm for derivative-free optimization of nonlinear
least-squares problems such as (1). A key benefit of POUNDERS is that it works with the
individual residuals (di − s(θi ; x))/σi rather than the aggregated fit function f (x). As a result,
POUNDERS can take advantage of the availability of the derivatives of some observables (e.g.,
binding energies) and can approximate nonlinearities in f using simulations at fewer x values. As
part of the TOPS collaboration, POUNDERS is now available through the open-source Toolkit
for Advanced Optimization (TAO) [10].
Figure 1 quantifies the computational savings in this ability to exploit the sums of squares
structure in (1) for a fit to 2,049 binding energies. By working with the residuals, the
POUNDERS variants obtain far better fits in far fewer evaluations than the analogous variants
of POUNDER, a similar algorithm that does not have access to the residuals. The warm variants
illustrate the benefit of using external simulations, done as part of an initial experimental design,
to warm start the optimization.
The savings in Figure 1 can be substantial. For the more complex functional optimized in
[11], each evaluation of f requires 14.4 CPU hours. The resulting parameterization is then
used to perform a simulation of nuclei across the nuclear table in a calculation requiring 9,000
processors for more than half a day [9].
Mathematical work has also contributed to the sensitivity analysis of nuclear energy
functionals.
Though the simulations are typically deterministic, the aforementioned
computational noise can obfuscate the number of reliable digits in computed functional
properties. The ECNoise algorithm described in [12] estimates a standard deviation-like quantity
using only a few simulations. Figure 2 illustrates the relative noise in the computed binding
energies for 2,049 nuclei with the parameterization obtained from the POUNDERS optimization
in Figure 1. Estimates of the noise can, for example, reveal limitations on the predictability of
computed functional observables and can enable stable approximations of the noisy derivatives
needed for sensitivity analysis.
4. Conclusions
Our work on eigenvalue calculations has made several impacts on nuclear structure calculations.
Earlier collaborations with nuclear physicists led to significant improvements to an eigensolver for
configuration interaction calculation, which was subsequently used in predicting the properties
of 14 F before the isotope was observed experimentally. The work described in this paper takes
configuration interaction calculation one step further. It enables our physics collaborators to
efficiently compute energy states of a nuclei with a prescribed total angular momentum instead
of computing many energy states and identifying those corresponding to the prescribed total
angular momentum.
The optimal parameters we have delivered to our physics collaborators have resulted in
realistic functionals that are now being explored by a variety of groups outside of the UNEDF
collaboration (as evidenced in the most recent JUSTIPEN conference (http://massexplorer.
org/justipen/index.php)). For example, our current results show remarkable power for
predicting fission barrier heights, which is a first step toward a microscopic understanding of
fission. These results are a consequence of including a richer set of experimental data and more
free parameters, resulting in problems that can be solved only by an efficient, state-of-the-art
optimization algorithm.
Acknowledgments
The work under TOPS at ANL and LBNL was supported by the Office of Advanced Scientific Computing
Research of the U.S. Department of Energy under contracts DE-AC02-06CH11357 (ANL), and DE-AC0205CH11231 (LBNL). The UNEDF SciDAC collaboration was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy
under grant numbers DE-FC02-09ER41582. This work was also supported by the Office of Nuclear Physics of
the U.S. Department of Energy under grant numbers DE-FG02-87ER40371 (Iowa State), DE-FG02-07ER41529
(Univ. of Tennessee) and DE-FG02-96ER40963 (Univ. of Tennessee).
Computational resources were provided through an INCITE award (James Vary, PI) at ORNL and ANL,
and by the Laboratory Computing Resource Center (LCRC) at ANL, the National Energy Research Scientific
Computing Center (NERSC) at LBNL, and the National Center for Computational Sciences at ORNL.
References
[1] http://www.unedf.org.
[2] J.P. Vary, P. Maris, E. Ng, C. Yang and M. Sosonkina. Ab initio nuclear structure – the large sparse matrix
eigenvalue problem. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 180:012083, 2009.
[3] P. Sternberg, E.G. Ng, C. Yang, P. Maris, J.P. Vary, M. Sosonkina, and H.V. Le. Accelerating Configuration
Interaction Calculations for Nuclear Structure. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM/IEEE Conference on
Supercomputing (Austin, Texas, November 15 - 21, 2008). Conference on High Performance Networking
and Computing. IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, 1-12.
[4] A.M. Shirokov, A.I. Mazur, S.A. Zaytsev, J.P. Vary and T.A. Weber. Nucleon-nucleon interaction in the Jmatrix inverse scattering approach and few-nucleon systems. Phys. Rev. C , 70:044005-1–044005-23, 2004.
[5] R.B. Lehoucq, D.C. Sorensen, P. Vu, and C. Yang. ARPACK: An implementation of the Implicitly Re-started
Arnoldi Iteration that computes some of the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of a large sparse matrix , 1995.
Available from ftp.caam.rice.edu under the directory pub/software/ARPACK.
[6] R.B. Lehoucq, D.C. Sorensen, and C. Yang. ARPACK USERS GUIDE: Solution of Large Scale Eigenvalue
Problems by Implicitly Restarted Arnoldi Methods. SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, 1998.
[7] D.C. Sorensen. Implicit application of polynomial filters in a k-step Arnoldi method. SIAM Journal on
Matrix Analysis and Applications, 13(1):357–385, January 1992.
[8] B.N. Parlett. The Symmetric Eigenvalue Problem. Prentice-Hall, 1980.
[9] M. Stoitsov, J. Moré, W. Nazarewicz, J.C. Pei, J. Sarich, N. Schunck, A. Staszczak, and S. Wild. Towards the
Universal Nuclear Energy Density Functional. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 180:012082, 2009.
[10] S. Benson, L. Curfman McInnes, J. Moré, T. Munson, and J. Sarich. Toolkit for Advanced Optimization,
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/tao.
[11] M. Kortelainen, T. Lesinski, J. Moré, W. Nazarewicz, J. Sarich, N. Schunck, M.V. Stoitsov, and S. Wild.
Nuclear Energy Density Optimization. Phys. Rev. C , 82:024313, 2010.
[12] J. Moré and S. Wild. 2011. Estimating Computational Noise SIAM J. Sci. Comput. to appear.
| 5cs.CE
|
arXiv:1612.06912v2 [math.GR] 29 Nov 2017
ON ANDREWS-CURTIS CONJECTURES FOR SOLUBLE
GROUPS
LUC GUYOT
Abstract. The Andrews-Curtis conjecture claims that every normally
generating n-tuple of a free group Fn of rank n ≥ 2 can be reduced to a basis
by means of Nielsen transformations and arbitrary conjugations. Replacing
Fn by an arbitrary finitely generated group yields natural generalizations
whose study may help disprove the original and unsettled conjecture. We
prove that every finitely generated soluble group satisfies the generalized
Andrews-Curtis conjecture in the sense of Borovik, Lubotzky and Myasnikov. In contrast, we show that some soluble Baumslag-Solitar groups do
not satisfy the generalized Andrews-Curtis conjecture in the sense of Burns
and Macedońska.
1. Introduction
The Andrews-Curtis conjecture (AC conjecture) is a long-standing open
problem in combinatorial group theory with a tight link to open problems in
low-dimensional topology [34, 1, 32]. The conjecture asserts that any n-tuple
whose components normally generate a free group of finite rank n ≥ 2 can
be transitioned to a basis by means of Nielsen transformations and arbitrary
conjugations. This article, which is only concerned with algebraic aspects,
addresses two generalizations of this conjecture to finitely generated soluble
groups. Our main results are Theorem 1.3, Theorem 1.9 and Corollary 1.10
below. Theorem 1.3 elaborates on results of [20, 8] to settle the generalized Andrews conjecture in the sense of [4] for soluble groups. Theorem 1.9
and Corollary 1.10 solve [8, Open Problem] and show in particular that the
metabelian Baumslag-Solitar group a, b aba−1 = b11 does not satisfy the
generalized Andrews conjecture in the sense of [7].
Before we can state the AC conjecture with precise terms, we need to introduce some definitions.
Date: December 1, 2017.
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 20F05, Secondary 20F16.
Key words and phrases. Andrews-Curtis conjecture; Nielsen equivalence; recalcitrance; coessential abelianization; metabelian groups; Baumslag-Solitar groups; N-Frattini
subgroup.
1
2
LUC GUYOT
Let G be a finitely generated group. We denote by rk(G) the rank of G, i.e.,
the minimal number of elements which generate G. For n ≥ rk(G), we define
a generating n-vector of G as an ordered n-tuple whose components generate
G. An elementary Nielsen transformation of Gk for k ≥ 1, is a transformation
which replaces for some i the component gi of g = (g1 , . . . , gk ) ∈ Gk by either
gj gi for some j 6= i or by gi−1 and leaves the other components unchanged. We
call Nielsen transformation the composition of any finite number of elementary
Nielsen transformations. The Nielsen transformations of Gn for n ≥ rk(G)
clearly preserve the set of generating n-vectors of G. Two such vectors are said
to be Nielsen equivalent if they can be related by a Nielsen transformation.
We say that a set {g1 , . . . , gn } of elements of a group G normally generates
G if the normal subgroup hg1 , . . . , gn iG generated by these elements is G. We
denote by w(G) the weight of G, i.e., the minimal number of elements which
normally generate G. For n ≥ w(G), we define a normally generating n-vector
of G as an ordered n-tuple whose components normally generate G.
The elementary transformations of Andrews and Curtis [2], are the elementary Nielsen transformations supplemented by the transformations replacing
a component gi by any of its conjugates gig + g −1gi g with g ∈ G, and leaving
the other components unchanged. We refer to these transformations as the elementary AC-transformations. We call AC-transformation the composition of
any finite number of elementary AC-transformations The AC-transformations
of Gn for n ≥ w(G) clearly preserve the set of normally generating n-vectors
of G. Two such vectors are said to be AC-equivalent if they can be related by
an AC-transformation. The AC conjecture claims that
Andrews-Curtis conjecture ([1], [2]). Every normally generating n-vector
of a free group Fn of rank n ≥ 2 is AC-equivalent to some basis of Fn .
Since any two bases of Fn are Nielsen equivalent [19, Proposition 4.1],
the conjecture can be rephrased saying that any two normally generating nvectors of Fn are AC-equivalent. We observe that, for every n ≥ 1, an ACtransformation of Gn induces an AC-transformation on Qn for any quotient Q
of G. Thus the existence of non-AC-equivalent vectors in some quotient of Fn
would disprove the AC conjecture, provided these vectors can be lifted to Fn .
This never holds for Abelian quotients:
Proposition 1.1. Let Fn be a free group of rank n ≥ 1 and π : Fn ։ G an
epimorphism onto an Abelian group G. Then the images under π of any two
normally generating n-vectors of Fn are AC-equivalent.
In a finitely generated Abelian group, AC-transformations and Nielsen transformations coincide and define hence the same equivalence relation. Therefore
the proposition holds if it is established for G = Zn , which is well-known [19,
ON ANDREWS-CURTIS CONJECTURES FOR SOLUBLE GROUPS
3
Proposition 4.4]. As a by-product, we obtain that the minimal number of ACtransformations needed to turn one image vector into the other is bounded
above by a constant which depends only on n.
Because of Proposition 1.1, none of the potential counterexamples to the
Andrews-Curtis conjecture (see, e.g., [14]) can be verified using Abelian quotients, even though finitely generated Abelian groups do have in general Nielsen
non-equivalent generating vectors (consider Z/5Z and see Theorem 1.12 below
for a complete treatment). Borovik, Lubotzky and Myasnikov [4] formulated
a generalization of the AC conjecture which takes into account false positives
occuring in abelianization, i.e., pairs of normally generating vectors whose images under abelianization are not AC-equivalent. Let [G, G] be the commutator subgroup of G and let πab : G ։ Gab = G/[G, G] be the abelianization
homomorphism.
Generalized Andrews-Curtis conjecture 1 (GACC 1). A finitely generated group G is said to satisfy the generalized Andrews-Curtis conjecture in the
sense of [4] if the following holds for every n ≥ max(w(G), 2): any two normally generating n-vectors of G are AC-equivalent if and only if their images
under abelianization are AC-equivalent.
The question as to whether there is a finitely generated group which does
not satisfy GACC 1 remains open. The class of groups satisfying GACC 1
comprises finite groups [4, Theorem 1.1], finitely generated groups whose maximal subgroups are normal [22, Theorem 1.5] and finitely generated groups of
the form S1 × · · · × Sk where each factor is a non-Abelian simple group [4,
Inspection of Theorem 2.1’s proof]. It also comprises finitely generated free
soluble groups [20, Corollary 1], and more generally, finitely generated soluble
groups G whose abelianization homomorphism is coessential, i.e., such that
every generating n-vector of Gab lifts to an n-generating vector of G for every
n ≥ rk(G) [8, Theorem 3.1]. Any of the two latter results easily implies
Proposition 1.2. Let Fn be a free group of rank n ≥ 1 and π : Fn ։ G an
epimorphism onto a soluble group G. Then the images under π of any two
normally generating n-vectors of Fn are AC-equivalent.
We shall establish with Corollary 1.10 below that there exist finitely generated soluble groups with non-coessential abelianization homomorphisms. Therefore the aforementioned results do not fully settle GACC 1 in the variety of
soluble groups. Elaborating on the techniques of [8, Theorem 3.1], we are able
to settle this conjecture for all soluble groups:
Theorem 1.3. Every finitely generated soluble group G satisfies GACC 1: for
every n ≥ max(w(G), 2), any two normally generating n-vectors of G are ACequivalent if and only if their images under abelianization are AC-equivalent.
4
LUC GUYOT
If we restrict to the case n > w(G), then the conclusion of Theorem 1.3
is actually valid for a class of groups which is larger than the union of all
classes mentioned earlier. The definition of this class involves the N-Frattini
subgroup W (G) of a group G. The group W (G) is the intersection of all
maximal normal subgroups of G if such exist, the group G otherwise. This
is obviously a characteristic subgroup of G and it is straightforward to check
that W (G/W (G)) = 1. In addition, the group W (G) coincides with the set
of elements which can be omitted from every normal generating subset of G,
that is, if hX, giG = G for some subset X of G and an element g ∈ W (G),
then hXiG = G (see [3, Satz 3.1] or [4, Lemma 4.1.(1)]). As a result, we have
w(G) = w(G/W (G)) whenever G 6= W (G). If every simple quotient of G has
a maximal subgroup, then W (G) contains the Frattini subgroup Φ(G) of G,
that is the intersection of all maximal subgroups of G if such exist, the group G
otherwise [10, Lemma 4]. Thus the inclusion Φ(G) ⊂ W (G) holds in particular
if G is finitely generated or soluble. But if G is a simple group without maximal
subgroups, e.g., one of those constructed in [28] or [25, Theorem 35.3], then
Φ(G) = G whereas W (G) = 1, so that Φ(G) 6⊂ W (G). The quotient G/W (G)
is, by construction, a subdirect product of an unrestricted product of simple
groups. Since simple soluble groups are Abelian, the following is immediate:
Lemma 1.4. [3, Folgerung 2.10]. If G is a finitely generated soluble group
then G/W (G) is Abelian.
We say that G satisfies GACC 1n>w if for every n > w(G), any two normally
generating n-vectors of G are AC-equivalent. As finitely generated Abelian
groups satisfy GACC 1n>w by Theorem 1.12, the case n > w(G) of Theorem
1.3 is a direct consequence of the following more general result
Proposition 1.5. Let G be a finitely generated group such that G/W (G) satisfies GACC 1n>w , then so does G.
We have already observed, thanks to Theorem 1.12, that GACC 1 implies
GACC 1n>w , but the question as to whether the converse holds is open. Proposition 1.5 naturally leads to the following definition. Let W be the class of the
groups G such that G/W (G) is finite, or Abelian, or of the form S1 × · · · × Sk
where each factor is non-Abelian and simple. Then we have the following
Corollary 1.6. Let G be a finitely generated group in W. Then G satisfies
GACC 1n>w .
By construction, the class W contains all the groups which were shown to
satisfy GACC 1. Let MN be the class of groups whose maximal subgroups
are normal. The subclass of W which consists of the finitely generated groups
ON ANDREWS-CURTIS CONJECTURES FOR SOLUBLE GROUPS
5
G such that G/W (G) is Abelian naturally generalizes the class of finitely generated groups lying in MN . Indeed MN coincides with the class of groups
G such that G/Φ(G) is Abelian [21, Theorem A]. Furthermore, the class W
contains finitely generated group which don’t sit in MN since a finitely generated soluble group in MN must be nilpotent. The class W also contains
those Sunic groups of intermediate growth that don’t belong to MN [11].
In the formulation of GACC 1, the case n = w(G) = 1 is purposely ignored. Indeed, the original AC conjecture is only concerned with n ≥ 2 since
w(Fn ) = n and it is trivial to address the case of F1 . Moreover, no non-trivial
perfect group can satisfy the specialization to n = 1 of GACC 1 (see, e.g.,
[31, Lemma 4.2]) whereas all finite groups satisfy it when n ≥ 2. Still, understanding AC-equivalence in the class of finitely generated weight one groups,
which encompasses the long-studied class of n-knot groups, is a problem on
its own (see, e.g., [27, 29]). We call g ∈ G a weight element of G if g normally
generates G, i.e., G = hgiG . We say that G satisfies GACC 1n=1 if w(G) = 1
and if two weight elements of G are AC-equivalent whenever their images under abelianization are AC-equivalent. Note that GACC 1n=1 is, by definition,
independent of GACC 1. In the class of finitely generated soluble groups, the
following results can be established:
Proposition 1.7. The following hold:
(i) A finitely generated soluble group is normally generated by a single
element if and only if its abelianization is cyclic.
(ii) A finitely generated metabelian group with cyclic abelianization satisfies
GACC 1n=1 .
(iii) There exists a three-generated polycyclic group of solubility length 3 with
infinitely many non-AC-equivalent weight elements.
(iv) The wreath product of finitely many finite cyclic groups with pairwise
coprime orders satisfies GACC 1n=1.
The assertion (i) of Proposition 1.7 is a straightforward corollary of Lemma
1.4, while assertions (ii) and (iii) are respectively [15, Theorem 14.1.(4)]
and [16, Theorem 9.1]. Our contribution is assertion (iv) which shows that
GACC 1n=1 can be satisfied by groups with arbitrary solubility lengths.
Here are three examples of non-cyclic metabelian groups which satisfy GACC 1n=1 :
• the dihedral group of order 2p with p an odd integer;
• the group of the invertible affine transformations x 7→ ax + b of a finite
field;
• the metabelian Baumslag-Solitar group BS(1, 2) = ha, b | aba−1 = b2 i.
Because of statements like Proposition 1.2 and the analogous [4, Corollary 1.3] for finite groups, it is sometimes asserted that a computation in a
6
LUC GUYOT
group which satisfies GACC 1 cannot lead to a counterexample to the classical AC conjecture. This is only true if one disregards strategies based on
the complexity of the reduction. Indeed, if reducing the image of a potential
counterexample in a group G to the image of a fixed basis requires arbitrarily
many AC-moves when G varies is some suitable class, then the AC conjecture
is disproved. Complexity measures tightly related to the minimal number of
required AC-moves were studied in [5, 18]. A coarser complexity measure,
termed recalcitrance, was studied in [8, 6, 7] with a view to disprove the classical AC conjecture using reductions in free soluble groups with arbitrary soluble
lengths.
We shall define the recalcitrance of a finitely generated group in the sense
of [6] and present then a new generalized Andrews-Curtis conjecture based
on this definition. In [7, Proposition 1] it was shown that the result of any
finite sequence of successive AC-transformations can be achieved by means of
a sequence of transformations of the form
(s1 , . . . , sn ) → (s1 , . . . , si w, . . . , sn ), w ∈ hs1 , . . . , si−1 , si+1 , . . . , sn iG
perhaps followed by a permutation of the n-vector, and conversely. Such a
transformation is called an M-transformation (M for “modulo” since si is replaced by any element congruent to it modulo the other sj ). We take the
M-transformations as our “elementary moves” and define the recalcitrance of
a normally generating n-vector of a group G of rank n to be the least number
of M-transformations needed to transition from that n-vector into a generating
n-vector of G. If such a transition is impossible, the recalcitrance is infinite.
The recalcitrance rec(G) of the group G is defined as the supremum of the
recalcitrances of all of its normally generating n-vectors. The classical AC
conjecture can now be rephrased in asserting that every finitely generated free
group has finite recalcitrance. This leads to
Generalized Andrews-Curtis conjecture 2 (GACC 2). A finitely generated group of rank n is said to satisfy the generalized Andrews-Curtis conjecture
in the sense of [7] if every normally generating n-tuple of G has finite recalcitrance.
A group G of rank n has recalcitrance zero if every normally generating
n-vector of G is a generating n-vector. Finitely generated groups with recalcitrance zero have been characterized in the following ways
Theorem 1.8. [6, Theorem 1], [21, Theorem A]. Let G be a finitely generated
group. Then the following are equivalent:
(i) rec(G) = 0.
(ii) The Frattini subgroup of G contains the derived subgroup of G.
ON ANDREWS-CURTIS CONJECTURES FOR SOLUBLE GROUPS
7
(iii) Every maximal subgroup of G is normal.
In particular, finitely generated nilpotent groups have recalcitrance zero
while finitely generated soluble and linear groups with zero recalcitrance must
be nilpotent (see [6, 21]). As noted in [21], the first Grigorchuk group and
the Gupta-Sidki p-groups are examples of non-linear groups with recalcitrance
zero. The infinite dihedral group is an example of group with recalcitrance one
[6, Examples 3.1] . By [8, Theorem 2.1], the recalcitrance of a finite group of
rank n is bounded by 2n−1, provided that n is greater than the abelianization
rank. By [8, Theorem 3.1], the recalcitrance of a soluble group G of rank n
is bounded by 2n − 1 if its abelianization homomorphism is coessential. The
authors ask in [8, Open Problem] whether the latter condition is necessary. We
answer this question in the positive and exhibit subsequently a two-generated
metabelian group with infinite recalcitrance.
Theorem 1.9 (Lemma 3.1 and Theorem 3.1 of [8]). Let G be a finitely generated soluble group of rank n. Then G satisfies GACC 2 if and only if its
abelianization homomorphism is coessential. If G satisfies GACC 2 then we
have, furthermore, rec(G) ≤ 2n − 1.
Using results of [13], we are able to prove with Proposition 3.3 below that
the abelianization homomorphism of the Baumslag-Solitar group BS(1, 11) =
a, b aba−1 = b11 is not coessential.
Corollary 1.10 (Proposition 3.3 and Corollary 3.4). The metabelian BaumslagSolitar group BS(1, 11) has some normally generating pairs of infinite recalcitrance. In particular, this group does not satisfy GACC 2.
Eventually, we present a graph which encodes the complexity of the reduction of normally generating vectors via M-transformations. For n ≥ w(G),
we denote by M-graph Mn (G) of G, that is the graph whose vertices are the
normally generating n-vectors of G and such that two vertices are connected
by an edge if an M-transformation, or the inversion of one component, turns
one vertex into the other. Note that swapping two components of an n-vector
can be carried out using three elementary Nielsen transformations followed
by the inversion of a component. Therefore, replacing inversions by swaps in
the definition of Mn (G) would result in a quasi-isometric graph with the same
connected components. We denote by diam(Γ) the diameter, possibly infinite,
of a connected graph Γ. We set
dn (G) = sup diam(C)
C
where C ranges over the set of connected components of Mn (G).
Thanks to [8, Theorem 3.1] and to a careful inspection of the proofs of
Proposition 1.5 and Theorem 1.3, we obtain
8
LUC GUYOT
Corollary 1.11. Let G be a finitely generated group in W, e.g., G is a finitely
generated soluble group. Then the following hold.
(1) If n > w(G), then Mn (G) is connected and we have:
diam(Mn (Gab )) ≤ diam(Mn (G)) ≤ diam(Mn (G/W (G))) + n + w(G).
(2) If n = w(G) > 1 and G is moreover soluble, then the following hold.
(i) The abelianization homomorphism G ։ Gab = G/[G, G] induces
bijection between the sets of connected components of Mn (G) and
Mn (Gab ).
(ii) We have dn (Gab ) ≤ dn (G) ≤ 2dn (Gab ) + 8(n − 1).
(iii) [8, Theorem 3.1] If the abelianization homomorphism of G is coessential, then a normally generating n-vector is a t distance at
most 2n − 1 from a generating n-vector.
If G is a finitely generated Abelian group, then Mn (G) is the Nielsen graph
Γn (G) depicted in [22], also known as the extended product replacement graph
Γ̃n (G) [26, Section 2.2]. In this case, the connected components of Mn (G) can
be described using the following
Theorem 1.12. [23, Theorem 1.1] Let G be a finitely generated Abelian group
whose invariant factor decomposition is
Zd1 × · · · × Zdk
with 1 6= d1 , di divides di+1 and where Zdi stands for Z/di Z with di ≥ 0 (in
particular Z0 = Z). Then every generating n-vector g with n ≥ k is Nielsen
equivalent to (δe1 , e2 , . . . , ek , 0, . . . , 0) for some δ ∈ (Zd1 )× and where ei ∈ G is
defined by (ei )i = 1 ∈ Zdi and (ei )j = 0 for j 6= i.
• If n > k, then we can take δ = 1.
• If n = k then δ must be ± det(g) where det(g) is the determinant of
the matrix whose rows are the images of the components of g under the
natural epimorphism G ։ (Zd1 )n .
In particular G has only one Nielsen equivalence class of generating n-vectors
for n > k while it has max(ϕ(d1 )/2, 1) Nielsen equivalence classes of generating
k-vectors where ϕ denotes the Euler totient function extended by ϕ(0) = 2.
Under the hypotheses of Theorem 1.12, the diagonal action of the automorphism group of G on Gn induces a transitive action on the set of connected
components of Mn (G), which are therefore isometric. Moreover, the diameter
dn (G) of any connected component of Mn (G) is finite if and only if G is finite.
The understanding of dn (G) for a finite Abelian group G seems to be rather
limited. As an example, d2 (Z/pZ) = diam(M2 (Z/pZ)) is of order log(p) [9,
Remark 3.3], a result which generalizes to all finite groups [26, Theorem 2.2.3].
ON ANDREWS-CURTIS CONJECTURES FOR SOLUBLE GROUPS
9
The paper is organized as follows. Section 2 is dedicated to the proofs
Theorem 1.3 and Proposition 1.7. Section 3 is dedicated to the proofs of
Theorem 1.9 and Corollary 1.10.
The following notation will be used throughout the article. Given a group
homomorphism π : G → Q and g ∈ Gk , we denote by π(g) ∈ Qk the k-vector
obtained by componentwise application of π to g. We will denote by πW the
natural epimorphism G ։ G/W (G). Recall that the following are equivalent:
• g normally generates G,
• πW (g) normally generates G/W (G).
2. The generalized Andrews-Curtis conjecture in the sense of
[4]
In this section we shall establish first Theorem 1.3, with its assumption
n ≥ max(w(G), 2). At the end of this section we shall consider the more
exotic case n = w(G) = 1. We start by handling the easiest range for n,
that is n > w(G). Our results for such values of n, i.e., Proposition 1.5 and
Corollary 1.6, apply to a class wider than the class of soluble groups, namely
the class W defined in the introduction.
Proof of Proposition 1.5. Let n > w(G) and let us fix a normally generating
n-vector g = (g1 , . . . , gn ) of G. Since G/W (G) satisfies GACC 1n>w by hypothesis, the vector πW (g) is AC-equivalent to a normally generating n-vector
whose index i component is trivial for all i > w(G). Replacing g by an ACequivalent vector if needed, we can hence assume that gi ∈ W (G) for every
i > w(G).
Consider now another normally generating n-vector h = (h1 , . . . , hn ) of G.
We shall show that h is AC-equivalent to g. By hypothesis, the vectors πW (g)
and πW (h) are AC-equivalent. Replacing h by an AC-equivalent vector if
needed, we can therefore assume that hi = gi wi with wi ∈ W (G) for every
i. Let i ∈ {1, . . . , w(G)}. As the vector (h1 , . . . , hw(G) ) normally generates G,
we can turn the component of h with index w(G) + 1 into wi by means of an
M-transformation. Subsequently we can turn the i-th component, namely hi ,
into gi , using an evident Nielsen transformation. Thus we obtain a normally
generating n-tuple h′ which is AC-equivalent to h and such that h′i = gi for
1 ≤ i ≤ w(G) and h′i ∈ W (G) for w(G) ≤ i ≤ n. Since (g1 , . . . , gw(G) )
normally generates G, we can replace h′i by gi for every w(G) < i ≤ n by
means of M-transformations, which yields g.
Proof of Corollary 1.6. Let G be a finitely generated group in W and let H =
G/W (G). By Proposition 1.5, it suffices to show that the conclusion holds for
H. If H is Abelian, the result follows from Theorem 1.12. If H is finite, it
10
LUC GUYOT
follows from [4, Theorem 1.1]. If H is a direct product of finitely many simple
non-Abelian groups, the result follows from [4, Proof of Theorem 2.1].
Because the proof Theorem 1.3 is essentially the same when G is twogenerated, we shall address this case first and indicate later on how to generalize to arbitrary finite ranks. In the two-generated case, the theorem can be
rephrased as follows.
Proposition 2.1. Let G be a soluble group of rank 2 and let (a, b) be a normally
generating pair of G. Then (ac, bd) is AC-equivalent to (a, b) for every c, d ∈
[G, G].
Proposition 2.1 can in turn be reduced to the following
Proposition 2.2. Let G be a soluble group of rank 2. Let (a, b) be a generating
pair of G and let k ∈ Z be such that (a, bk ) normally generates G. Then
(ac, bk d) is AC-equivalent to (a, bk ) for every c, d ∈ [G, G].
Let us postpone the proof of Proposition 2.2 to the end of this section.
Taking this proposition for granted, we can now prove Theorem 1.3 provided
n = 2.
Proof of Theorem 1.3: the case n = 2. Consider two normally generating pairs
g and h. Since each AC-move on G2 induces a Nielsen transformation on
G2ab , the generating pairs πab (g) and πab (h) are Nielsen equivalent if g and
h are AC-equivalent. Let us show that Proposition 2.1 implies the converse.
To this end, assume that πab (g) and πab (h) are Nielsen equivalent and write
g = (a, b). Applying to h a Nielsen transformation taking πab (h) to πab (g),
we obtain a normally generating pair h′ of the form (ac, bd) with c, d ∈ [G, G].
By Proposition 2.1, the pair h′ , and hence h, is AC-equivalent to g.
Let us now prove that Proposition 2.1 follows from Proposition 2.2. To do
so, consider two normally generating pairs h = (x, y), h′ = (xc, yd) of G with
c, d ∈ [G, G]. By Theorem 1.12, there is a generating pair g = (a, b) of G and
k ∈ Z such that πab (h) is Nielsen equivalent to πab (a, bk ). Applying a suitable
Nielsen transformation to h, we obtain an AC-equivalent pair of the form
(ac1 , bk d1 ) with c1 , d1 ∈ [G, G]. Applying the same Nielsen transformation to
h′ , we obtain an AC-equivalent pair of the form (ac2 , bk d2 ) with c2 , d2 ∈ [G, G].
By Proposition 2.2, the latter two pairs are both Nielsen equivalent to (a, bk ).
As a result, the pairs h and h′ are AC-equivalent.
The next definitions and preliminary results will enable us to present the
proof of Proposition 2.2 and the general case of Theorem 1.3. Our proofs will
follow closely the lines of [8, Theorem 3.2]’s proof. First we need to generalize
the concept of weighted commutators used by the latter. Recall that [G, G]
ON ANDREWS-CURTIS CONJECTURES FOR SOLUBLE GROUPS
11
denotes the commutator subgroup of G, that is the subgroup generated by the
commutators [x, y] + x−1 y −1xy for x, y ∈ G. Let a and b be arbitrary elements
of a group G. Commutators of weight w in a and b are defined inductively
as follows. For w = 1, these are taken to be a±1 and b±1 . A commutator of
weight w > 1 in a and b is then defined to be an element of G expressible as
[c1 , c2 ] where c1 and c2 are respectively commutators of weights w1 , w2 < w in
a and b, such that w1 + w2 = w. We define similarly commutators of weight
w in conjugates of a and b, these being just the conjugates of a±1 and b±1 if
w = 1. It is easy to prove, using the standard group identities
[xy, z] = [x, z][[x, z], y][y, z]
[x, yz] = [x, z][x, y][[x, y], z]
that every element of the commutator subgroup of ha, bi (resp. of the commutator subgroup of ha, biG ) can be expressed as a product of finitely many
commutators of weights ≥ 2 in a and b (resp. commutators in conjugates of a
and b). The proofs of [8, Lemmas 3.1 and 3.2] can be used almost verbatim to
demonstrate the following
Lemma 2.3. Let G be a soluble group such that w(G) = 2 and let a, b, c ∈ G.
Then the following assertions hold.
(i) [8, Lemma 3.1] If c is expressible as a weighted commutator in conjugates of a and b involving a±1 , and g is any element of G(i) , the i-th
term of the derived series of G, then the result ĉ of replacing every
occurrences of a in c by g, is also in G(i) .
(ii) [8, Lemma 3.2] If G = ha, bi (resp. G = ha, biG ) and if c is expressible
as a product c1 · · · cn of weighted commutators ci in a and b (resp. in
conjugates of a and b), of arbitrary weights ≥ 2, each involving a±1 at
least twice, then haciG contains a.
We are now in position to prove Proposition 2.2.
Proof of Proposition 2.2. Let (a, b) be a generating pair of G and let k ∈ Z
such that ha, bk iG = G. Let g = (ac, bk d) with c, d ∈ [G, G]. We can assume
that d is a product of non-trivial weighted commutators of a and b, so that
each of these commutators involves a±1 at least once.
We shall assume first that c is expressible as a product of weighted commutators in conjugates of a and bk , each involving a±1 at least twice. By Lemma
2.3.2, we have a ∈ haciG . Since G = ha, bi, we deduce that [G, G] ⊂ haiG .
Therefore we can turn g into (ac, bk c) by means of a single M-transformation.
Using a subsequent Nielsen move, we get (ab−k , bk c). As [G, G] ⊂ hab−k iG ,
we obtain (ab−k , bk ) by applying another M-transformation. Applying a last
Nielsen transformation yields (a, bk ), which proves the result in this case.
12
LUC GUYOT
If not all of the commutator factors cj of c involve a±1 at least twice, we
replace every occurrence of b±k in all of them by d∓1 and expand the result
as a product cj1 cj2 · · · cjk of commutators in a and b using the above group
identities. Since d is a product of commutators in a and b involving each at least
one occurrence of a±1 , this procedure must produce additional occurrences of
a±1 , that is, all commutators cjr will have at least two occurrences of a±1 .
We thus obtain, via a single M-transformation, a pair (ac′ , bk d) where c′ is a
product of commutators in a and b all of which involve a±1 at least twice.
Lemma 2.3.1.ii applies and proceeding now as in the earlier case, we have that
at most two more M-transformations to get to (a, bk ).
We will prove now Theorem 1.3 in full generality. The definition of commutators of weight k in (conjugates of ) x1 , . . . , xn is a straightforward generalization
of the definition in the case n = 2 given above. The following generalization
of Lemma 2.3 is immediate.
Lemma 2.4. Let G be a soluble group such that w(G) = n and let x1 , . . . , xn , c
be elements of G. Then the following assertions hold.
(i) [8, Lemma 3.1′ ] If c is expressible as a weighted commutator in conju(i)
gates of x1 , . . . , xn , each involving x±1
1 , and g is any element of G ,
the i-th term of the derived series of G, then the result ĉ of replacing
every occurrences of x1 in c by g, is also in G(i) .
(ii) [8, Lemma 3.2′ ] If G = hx1 , . . . , xn i (resp. G = hx1 , . . . , xn iG ) and if c is
expressible as a product c1 · · · cn of commutators ci in x1 , . . . , xn (resp.
in conjugates of x1 , . . . , xn ), of arbitrary weights ≥ 2, each involving
G
x±1
1 at least twice, then hx1 ci contains x1 .
Proof of Theorem 1.3: the general case. By Corollary 1.6, we can assume that
n = w(G) ≥ 2. Let g and h be two normally generating n-vectors. Since each
AC-move on Gn induces a Nielsen transformation on Gnab , the generating pairs
πab (g) and πab (h) are Nielsen equivalent if g and h are AC-equivalent.
We shall prove now the converse. To this end, assume that πab (g) and
πab (h) are Nielsen equivalent. Reasoning as in the case n = 2, we can find
a generating n-vector (a1 , . . . , an−1 , b) of G and k ∈ Z such that πab (g) and
πab (h) are both Nielsen equivalent to πab (a1 , . . . , an−1 , bk ). Therefore it suffices
to show that (a1 c1 , . . . , an−1 cn−1 , bk d) is AC-equivalent to (a1 , . . . , an−1 , bk ) for
every c1 , . . . , cn−1 , d ∈ [G, G].
If in the expression of ci as a product of weighted commutators in conjugates of a1 , . . . , an−1 , bk , some of the factors do not involve a±1
at least twice,
i
then we replace the occurrences of bk and aj (j 6= i) appearing in those factors with d∓1 (since bk ≡ d−1 mod hbk diG ) and the corresponding c∓1
(since
j
−1
G
aj ≡ cj mod haj cj i ), and repeat this until the factors contain at least two
ON ANDREWS-CURTIS CONJECTURES FOR SOLUBLE GROUPS
13
occurrences of ai , or they become trivial (as elements of G(k) , where k is the
solubility length of G), which will occur if a±1
fails to appear, or appears just
i
once, in the course of this iteration. Thus, performing at most n − 1 Mtransformations if needed, we can assume that ci is expressible as a product
of commutators in a1 , . . . , an−1 , bk , of arbitrary weights ≥ 2, each involving
a±1
at least twice. Since ha1 c1 , . . . , an−1 cn−1 iG coincides with ha1 , . . . , an−1 iG
i
by Lemma 2.4.ii, it contains [G, G]. Hence a subsequent M-transformation
can be used to obtain the vector (a1 c1 , . . . , an−1 cn−1 , bk c1 ). By means of a single Nielsen move, we get (a1 b−k , . . . , an−1 cn−1 , bk c1 ). As ha1 b−k , . . . , an−1 cn−1 iG
still contains [G, G], we can iterate this procedure until we obtain a vector of
the form (a1 b−k , . . . , an−1 b−k , bk ). Eventually, n − 1 additional Nielsen transformations yield (a1 , . . . , an−1 , bk ).
We conclude this section with the proof of Proposition 1.7 which deals with
finitely generated groups of weight one. Finitely generated groups of weight at
most one have been characterized as the homomorphic images of knot groups,
while groups of weight at most k are the homomorphic images of k-complement
link groups [12]. A knot group can have infinitely many non-AC equivalent
elements, each of which normally generates the whole group [27, 29]. By
contrast, Proposition 1.7 shows that the study of AC-equivalence is trivial for
all weight one metabelian groups and also some groups with arbitrary solubility
lengths.
Proof of Proposition 1.7. (i). Let G be a finitely generated soluble group. By
Lemma 1.4, we have w(G) = w(Gab ) = w(G/W (G)), a result originally proved
by Baer [3, Folgerung 2.10 and Satz 6.4]. Therefore w(G) = 1 if and only if
Gab is cyclic.
(ii). Let G be a finitely generated metabelian group with cyclic abelianization C = hci. Let a be a lift of c in G. Every weight element of G which is also
a lift of c must be of the form ad for some d ∈ [G, G]. Therefore, it suffices to
show that every d ∈ [G, G] is of the form [a, e(d)] for some e(d) ∈ [G, G]. By
k
k
setting g c + g a for g ∈ [G, G] and k ∈ Z, we define an action of C on [G, G].
Extending linearly this action to Z[C], the integral group ring of C, we turn
[G, G] into a module over Z[C]. For every k, l ∈ Z and every d, e ∈ [G, G],
k
l
the following identity holds: [ak d, al e] = e1−c d−(1−c ) . Since 1 − c divides both
1 − ck and 1 − cl in Z[C], we have [ak d, al e] ∈ [G, G]1−c . As G = hai[G, G], we
deduce that [G, G] = [G, G]1−c , which proves the result.
(iii). See [16, Theorem 9.1].
(iv). Let us consider finite cyclic groups C1 , . . . , Ck . We set G1 = C1 and
Gi = C1 ≀ · · · ≀ Ci for every 1 < i ≤ k, so that Gi = Gi−1 ≀ Ci if i > 1. It is easily
checked that (Gi )ab = C1 × · · · × Ci , and the latter group is cyclic for every
14
LUC GUYOT
i since the orders |Ci | of the cyclic groups Ci are pairwise coprime integers.
By the above assertion (1), we have w(Gi ) = 1 and every weight element of
Gi is a lift of a generator of (Gi )ab . For every i, we pick a generator ci of Ci
and define a lift xi of (c1 , . . . , ci ) ∈ (Gi )ab in Gi in the following way. We set
i
x1 = c1 and xi = fi ci where fi ∈ GC
i−1 is defined by fi (1) = xi−1 and for i > 1
we set fi (c) = 1 for c 6= 1. We shall prove by induction on k that the order
of xk coincides with the order of (Gk )ab and that xk is self-centralizing in Gk ,
i.e., the centralizer of xk in Gk is the cyclic subgroup hxk i generated by xk .
|C |
k
If k = 1, this is obvious. If k > 1, then gk−1 + xk k belongs to GC
k−1 and
is defined by gk−1 (c) = xk−1 for every c ∈ Ck . Since the order of xk−1 is the
order (Gk−1 )ab by induction hypothesis, we infer that the order of xk is the
order of (Gk )ab . As xk−1 is self-centralizing in Gk−1 by induction hypothesis
and ck is self-centralizing in Ck , we deduce from [17, Theorem 1.(5)] that xk
is self-centralizing in Gk , which proves the claim. Eventually, we shall prove
that every lift of (c1 , . . . , ck ) in Gk is a conjugate of xk , hence the result. Every
such lift is of the form xk d for some d ∈ [Gk , Gk ]. Therefore the result is
established if the conjugacy class of xk has as many elements as [Gk , Gk ], that
is |Gk |/|(Gk )ab | elements. This is indeed verified since the centralizer of xk is
hxk i and has |(Gk )ab | elements.
3. The Andrews-Curtis conjecture in the sense of [8]
This section is dedicated to the proofs of Theorem 1.9 and Corollary 1.10.
We shall use the following definition in a preliminary result. An homomorphism π : G → Q is termed normally coessential if every normally generating
vector of Q lifts to a normally generating vector of G. Theorem 1.9 is a
straightforward consequence of [8, Theorem 3.1] and the following
Lemma 3.1. Let G be a finitely generated group of rank n and let πab : G ։
Gab be its abelianization homomorphism.
(i) Assume that G is soluble. Let g ∈ Gk with k ≥ n. Then g normally
generates G if and only if πab (g) generates Gab . In particular πab is
normally coessential.
(ii) If every normally generating n-vector of G has finite recalcitrance and
πab is normally coessential then πab is coessential.
Proof. (i). Apply Lemma 1.4. (ii). Let g be a generating k-vector of Gab with
k ≥ n. By hypothesis there is a lift g of g in Gk which normally generates
G. Since g can be transitioned to a generating k-vector h of G by means of
finitely many M-transformations, there is a Nielsen transformation which takes
ON ANDREWS-CURTIS CONJECTURES FOR SOLUBLE GROUPS
15
g to πab (h). The inverse transformation takes h to a generating k-vector of G
which is also a lift of g in Gk . Therefore πab is coessential.
We define now a class of metabelian groups whose abelianization homomorphisms can be studied by elementary ring-theoretic means. Let C = hai be a
cyclic group, finite or infinite, given with a generator a. Let R be a quotient
ring of Z[C], the integral group ring of C. We denote by α the image of a in R
via the quotient map; thus α ∈ R× . Let G = R ⋊α C be the semi-direct product of the additive group of R with C, where a acts on R via multiplication by
α. We identify R and C with their natural images in G, i.e., we have G = RC
and R ∩ C = 1. The commutator subgroup of G is easily seen to be (1 − α)R.
Then we have Gab = RC × C where RC + R/(1 − α)R is a homomorphic
image of Z. Moreover the abelianization homomorphism πab : G ։ Gab splits
as πab = πC × IdC where πC : R ։ RC is the natural map and IdC denotes
the identity endomorphism of C.
Proposition 3.2. Let G = R ⋊α C be as above. Then the following are
equivalent:
(i) The abelianization homomorphism G ։ Gab is coessential.
(ii) The natural group homomorphism R× → RC× is surjective.
Proof. Since G is two-generated, the introductory remark of [24] implies that
πab is coessential if and only if every generating pair of Gab lifts to a generating
pair of G. Let g be a generating pair of Gab . By [13, Corollary 1], there is
a generating pair h which is Nielsen equivalent to g and of the form (u, ak )
for some u ∈ RC× and some k ∈ Z such that C = hak i. Clearly g lifts to a
generating pair of G if and only if h does. By [13, Lemma 7], the pair h lifts
to a generating pair of G if and only if u lifts to a unit of R.
Thus the abelianization homomorphism of R ⋊α C is certainly coessential
if RC ≃ Z/nZ with n ∈ {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6}. This also clearly holds if 1 − α is
a nilpotent element of R, i.e., (1 − α)n = 0 for some n > 0, which means
that G is nilpotent. If G is nilpotent then the result is actually well-known
and generalizes as follows: a group G with zero recalcitrance has a coessential
abelianization homomorphism [22, Proposition 2.2].
Proposition 3.3. Let R and RC be as above. Then the natural group homomorphism R× → RC× is surjective in the following cases:
(i) R is finite.
(ii) R = Zm [X ±1 ], the ring of Laurent polynomials over Zm + Z/mZ and
α = X.
2iπ
(iii) R = Z[ζn ] where α = ζn = e n and n > 0.
16
LUC GUYOT
Proof. (i). Apply Justin Chen’s lemma, see [13, Lemma 16] or [33].
(ii). Any u ∈ (Zm )× is the image of the corresponding constant Laurent
polynomial which is clearly invertible in Zm [X ±1 ].
(iii). If n has more than one prime divisor, then 1 − ζn is a unit of Z[ζn ] by
[30, Proposition 7.6.2.ii] and hence RC is trivial. So we can assume that n is
a
n
a power of a prime. In this case ξa = 1−ζ
is a unit for every a ∈ Z coprime
1−ζn
with n by [30, Proposition 7.6.2.ii]. We have RC = Z/Φn (1)Z where Φn is
the n-th cyclotomic polynomial and we know that Φn (1) divides n. As ξa ≡ a
mod (1 − ζn )Z[ζn ], the result follows.
Corollary 3.4. The Baumslag-Solitar group BS(1, n) = a, b aba−1 = bn
has infinite recalcitrance if n = pd with p prime, d ≥ 1 and n ≥ 11.
Proof. It is well-known that BS(1, n) ≃ R ⋊α C with R = Z[1/n], C = Z and
α = n. We have RC = R/(n − 1)R ≃ Z/(n − 1)Z. The unit group of R is
the multiplicative subgroup of Q∗ generated by −1 and the prime divisors of
n. If n = pd then this group maps onto a cyclic subgroup of RC× of order at
most 2d. For n ≥ 11, the group RC× has strictly more than 2d elements, so
that R× → RC× is not surjective. The result now follows from Theorem 3.2
Acknowledgements. The author is grateful to Tatiana Smirnova-Nagnibeda
for pointing out that some Sunic groups of intermediate growth sit in the
class W defined in the introduction. The author is also thankful to Wolfgang
Pitsch, Pierre de la Harpe, Yves de Cornulier, Daniel Oancea and Robert
Geoffrey Burns for their helpful comments and their encouragements.
References
1. J. J. Andrews and M. L. Curtis. Free groups and handlebodies. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.,
16:192–195, 1965.
2. J. J. Andrews and M. L. Curtis. Extended Nielsen operations in free groups. Amer.
Math. Monthly, 73:21–28, 1966.
3. R. Baer. Der reduzierte Rang einer Gruppe. J. Reine Angew. Math., 214/215:146–173,
1964.
4. A. V. Borovik, A. Lubotzky, and A. G. Myasnikov. The finitary Andrews-Curtis conjecture. In Infinite groups: geometric, combinatorial and dynamical aspects, volume 248
of Progr. Math., pages 15–30. Birkhäuser, Basel, 2005.
5. M. Bridson. The complexity of balanced presentations and the Andrews-Curtis conjecture. arXiv:1504.04187 [math.GR], April 2015.
6. R. G. Burns, W. N. Herfort, S.-M. Kam, O. Macedońska, and P. A. Zalesskii. Recalcitrance in groups. Bull. Austral. Math. Soc., 60(2):245–251, 1999.
7. R. G. Burns and O. Macedońska. Balanced presentations of the trivial group. Bull.
London Math. Soc., 25(6):513–526, 1993.
8. R. G. Burns and D. Oancea. Recalcitrance in groups II. J. Group Theory, 15(1):101–117,
2012.
ON ANDREWS-CURTIS CONJECTURES FOR SOLUBLE GROUPS
17
9. P. Diaconis and R. Graham. The graph of generating sets of an abelian group. Colloq.
Math., 80(1):31–38, 1999.
10. V. Dlab and V. Kořı́nek. The Frattini subgroup of a direct product of groups. Czechoslovak Math. J., 10 (85):350–358, 1960.
11. D. Francoeur and A. Garrido. Maximal subgroups of groups of intermediate growth.
arXiv:1611.01216 [math.GR], November 2016.
12. F. González-Acuna. Homomorphs of knot groups. Ann. of Math. (2), 102(2):373–377,
1975.
13. L. Guyot. Generators of split extensions of Abelian groups by cyclic groups. Preprint,
arXiv: [math.GR], April 2016.
14. G. Havas and C. Ramsay. Breadth-first search and the Andrews-Curtis conjecture. Internat. J. Algebra Comput., 13(1):61–68, 2003.
15. J. A. Hillman. Four-manifolds, geometries and knots, volume 5 of Geometry & Topology
Monographs. Geometry & Topology Publications, Coventry, 2002.
16. J. A. Hillman. 2-knots with solvable groups. J. Knot Theory Ramifications, 20(7):977–
994, 2011.
17. W. P. Kappe and D. B. Parker. Elements with trivial centralizer in wreath products.
Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 150:201–212, 1970.
18. B. Lishak. Balanced finite presentations of the trivial group. arXiv:1504.00418
[math.GR], April 2015.
19. R. Lyndon and P. Schupp. Combinatorial group theory. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1977.
Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete, Band 89.
20. A. G. Myasnikov. Extended Nielsen transformations and the trivial group. Mat. Zametki,
35(4):491–495, 1984.
21. A. Myropolska. The class MN of groups in which all maximal subgroups are normal.
arXiv:1509.08090 [math.GR], 2015.
22. A. Myropolska. Andrews-Curtis and Nielsen equivalence relations on some infinite
groups. J. Group Theory, 19(1):161–178, 2016.
23. D. Oancea. A note on Nielsen equivalence in finitely generated abelian groups. Bull.
Aust. Math. Soc., 84(1):127–136, 2011.
24. D. Oancea. Coessential abelianization morphisms in the category of groups. Canad.
Math. Bull., 56(2):395–399, 2013.
25. A. Y. Ol′ shanskiı̆. Geometry of defining relations in groups, volume 70 of Mathematics
and its Applications (Soviet Series). Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, Dordrecht,
1991. Translated from the 1989 Russian original by Yu. A. Bakhturin.
26. I. Pak. What do we know about the product replacement algorithm? In Groups and
computation, III (Columbus, OH, 1999), volume 8 of Ohio State Univ. Math. Res. Inst.
Publ., pages 301–347. de Gruyter, Berlin, 2001.
27. S. P. Plotnick. Infinitely many disk knots with the same exterior. Math. Proc. Cambridge
Philos. Soc., 93(1):67–72, 1983.
28. S. Shelah. On a problem of Kurosh, Jónsson groups, and applications. In Word problems,
II (Conf. on Decision Problems in Algebra, Oxford, 1976), volume 95 of Stud. Logic
Foundations Math., pages 373–394. North-Holland, Amsterdam-New York, 1980.
29. D. S. Silver, W. Whitten, and S. G. Williams. Knot groups with many killers. Bull.
Aust. Math. Soc., 81(3):507–513, 2010.
30. E. Weiss. Algebraic number theory. Dover Publications, Inc., Mineola, NY, 1998. Reprint
of the 1963 original.
18
LUC GUYOT
31. J. Wiegold and J. S. Wilson. Growth sequences of finitely generated groups. Arch. Math.
(Basel), 30(4):337–343, 1978.
32. P. Wright. Group presentations and formal deformations. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.,
208:161–169, 1975.
33. zcn (http://mathoverflow.net/users/44201/zcn). When does a ring surjection imply a surjection of the group of units?
MathOverflow.
URL:http://mathoverflow.net/q/153526 (version: 2014-01-03).
34. E. C. Zeeman. On the dunce hat. Topology, 2:341–358, 1964.
EPFL ENT CBS BBP/HBP. Campus Biotech. B1 Building, Chemin des mines,
9, Geneva 1202, Switzerland
E-mail address: [email protected]
| 4math.GR
|
arXiv:1601.04150v1 [cs.CE] 16 Jan 2016
Selection of Most Effective Control Variables for
Solving Optimal Power Flow Using Sensitivity
Analysis in Particle Swarm Algorithm
Mohamed Abuella
Constantine J. Hatziadoniu
Departmtent of Electrical and Computer Engineering
University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Charlotte, USA
Email: [email protected]
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Southern Illinois University
Carbondale, USA
Email: [email protected]
Abstract—Solving the optimal power flow problem is one of the
main objectives in electrical power systems analysis and design.
The modern optimization algorithms such as the evolutionary
algorithms are also adopted to solve this problem, especially when
the intermittency nature of generation resources are included,
as in wind and solar energy resources, where the models are
stochastic and non-linear. This paper uses the particle swarm
optimization algorithm for solving the optimal power flow for
IEEE-30 bus system. In addition to selection of the most effective
control variables based on sensitivity analysis to alleviate the
violations and return the system back to its normal state.
This adopted strategy would decrease the optimal power flow
calculation burden by particle swarm optimization algorithm,
especially with large systems.
Keywords— Optimal power flow; Particle swarm; Sensitivity
analysis.
I. I NTRODUCTION
Optimal power flow (OPF) is a major tool that has been
extensively researched since it has introduced. It deals with
the minimum cost of power production in electrical power systems with certain constraints [1], [2]. The studies about OPF
methods can be traced back to the 1960s when Carpentier and
Siroux firstly discussed the OPF problem, and then Domme
and Tinney presented a simplified derivative algorithm which
is the first practicable algorithm for OPF problem [3]. But in
this algorithm the vibration phenomenon is appearing closing
to the optimum. Since then, various kinds of mathematical
programming approaches, based on linear and nonlinear programming were proposed in succession, including Newton
method, quadratic programming, and interior-point method
[3].
The aforementioned methods utilize first or second derivative in essence. By this way, it is apt to fall into local optima.
Furthermore, there is a difficulty of applying derivative-based
optimization techniques to solve OPF for systems that including variable generations. Therefore, various non-classical optimization methods have emerged to cope with some of these
shortcomings [4]. The main modern optimization techniques
are genetic algorithm (GA), evolutionary programming (EP),
artificial neural network (ANN), simulated annealing (SA), ant
colony optimization (ACO), and particle swarm optimization
(PSO). They have been successfully applied to wide range
of optimization problems in which global solutions are more
preferred than local ones [5], [6].
Kennedy and Eberhart introduced PSO as a new heuristic
method [7]. Different PSO applications in power systems
are covered in [6]. Abido introduced PSO to solve the OPF
problem [8]. References [9], [10] have the mechanism of
implementing PSO for solving OPF.
The sensitivity analysis of OPF is applied to deduce the
sensitivity matrices of the voltage and the current states. The
fundamentals of sensitivity analysis of OPF can be found
with details in [11], [12], and [13]. The sensitivity analysis
is applied in power systems for voltage stability studies as
a fast indication of the voltage collapse and a safe voltage
margin [14], [15], [16], and [17].
The rest of the paper is organized as follows. Section II gives
a description of the optimal power flow problem. Section III
introduces the mathematical derivation of the sensitivity analysis. Section IV particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm
is introduced with its parameters and its mechanism is also
explained. In Section V implementation of PSO and the
sensitivity analysis to find the OPF solution for several study
cases are presented and the discussion of the results is included
as well. Finally, Section VI gives the conclusions.
II. O PTIMAL P OWER F LOW
The optimal power flow is an optimization problem to find
the optimal allocation of output power among the available
generators with given constraints without violations of the
operation and the security constraints of the system. The optimal allocation depends on various factors, such as operating
cost, system security (or risk) and CO2 emissions, in general
they are called cost factors. The objective function of the
optimization problem in this paper is to minimize the operating
cost of real power generation, while keeping the electrical
system in normal and secure operation condition.
The objective function and the constraints are mostly nonlinear and many methods and algorithms have been developed
on the basis of cost factors; generation source type, conventional or renewable; uncertainty treatment (i.e. deterministic or
stochastic). For instance, Lagrangian relaxation, direct search
method, evolution programming, particle swarm optimization,
genetic algorithms, and simulated annealing are some of the
solution methods for the optimal power flow problem [18].
In mathematical terms, the optimal power flow (OPF) is an
optimization problem set up to minimize an objective function
subject to equality and inequality constraints.
The equality constraints are the power flow equations, while
the inequality constraints are the limits on control variables
and the operating limits of power system dependent (state)
variables. The control variables include the generator real
power, the generator bus voltages, the transformer tap settings,
and the reactive power of switchable VAR sources. On the
other hand, the dependent or state variables include the load
bus voltages, the generator reactive powers, and the line flows.
Generally, the OPF problem is a large-scale highly constrained
nonlinear non-convex optimization problem.
Mathematically, the OPF problem can be formulated as
follow:
M in J(x,u)
u is the vector of independent (control) variables consisting
of generator voltages VG , generator real power outputs PG
except the slack bus PG1 , transformer tap settings T, and shunt
VAR compensations QC .
Hence, u can be expressed as:
uT = [VG1 ...VGN G , PG2 ...PGN G , T1 ...TN T , QC1 ...QCN C ]
(7)
Where indices NT and NC are the number of the regulating
transformers and shunt compensators respectively.
• Generating constraints:
Generator voltages, real power outputs, and reactive
power outputs are restricted by their lower and upper
limits as follows:
•
h(x,u) ≤ 0
(3)
Where J is the objective function to be minimized, it could
be the cost of real power of thermal units, wind-powered
units, or mix of them. g is the equality constraints represent
the power flow equations. h is the inequality constraints that
represent the operating limits of the system.
Where g(x,u) = 0 are the balanced power flow equations as
following:
Pi − Vi
n
X
Vj Yij cos(δi − δj − θij ) = 0
Qi − Vi
Vj Yij sin(δi − δj − θij ) = 0
,
≤ PGi ≤ PGmax
PGmin
i
i
i = 1, ..., N G
(9)
(5)
j=1
Where Pi is the specified real power at bus i, and it equals to
the difference between the generation and demand real power
(PGi -PDi ) at bus i, and the same for Qi . Yij is the admittance
between buses i and j. Vi is the voltage magnitude of bus i
and δi is the phase angle of the voltage at bus i.
In equations (1-3), x is the vector of dependent (state)
variables consisting of slack bus power PG1 , load bus voltages
VL , generator reactive power output QG , and transmission line
ratings (loadings) Sline . Here x can be expressed as:
xT = [PG1 , VL1 ...VLN L , QG1 ...QGN G , Sline1 ...Slinenl ] (6)
Where the indices NL, NG, and nl are number of load
buses, number of generators, and number of transmission lines
respectively.
i = 1, ..., N G
Timin ≤ Ti ≤ Timax ,
•
max
Qmin
Ci ≤ QCi ≤ QCi ,
•
(10)
i = 1, ..., N T
(11)
Shunt VAR constraints:
Shunt VAR compensations are restricted by their limits
as follows:
i = 1, ..., N C
(12)
Security constraints:
These include the constraint of voltages at load buses and
the transmission line loadings as follows:
,
≤ VLi ≤ VLmax
VLmin
i
i
max
,
Slinei ≤ Sline
i
(4)
j=1
n
X
(8)
Transformer constraints:
Transformer tap settings are bounded as follows:
Subject to:
(2)
i = 1, ..., N G
max
Qmin
Gi ≤ QGi ≤ QGi ,
(1)
g(x,u) = 0
,
≤ VGi ≤ VGmax
VGmin
i
i
i = 1, ..., N L
(13)
i = 1, ..., nl
(14)
It is worth to mention that the control variables are selfconstrained. The hard inequalities of PG1 , VL , QG , and Sline
can be incorporated in the objective function as quadratic
penalty terms (penalty functions). Therefore, the objective
function in equation (1) can be augmented as follows:
)2 + λV
Jaug = J + λP (PG1 − PGlim
1
NL
X
)2
(VLi − VLlim
i
i=1
+λQ
NG
X
i=1
2
(QGi − Qlim
Gi ) + λS
nl
X
max 2
)
(Slinei − Sline
i
i=1
(15)
Where λP , λV , λQ , and λS are penalty factors and xlim is
the limit value of the dependent variable x given as:
max
x
;
(x > xmax )
xlim =
(16)
min
x
;
(x < xmin )
III. S ENSITIVITY A NALYSIS FOR O PTIMAL P OWER F LOW
Earlier research on the application of sensitivity analysis in
power system belongs to Peschon et al [11]. They introduced
two methods. First one can be applicable to normal power
flow problems for small changes in the variables such as active
generation, and the second method considers the minimization
of objective function satisfying some constraints such as power
flow equation. Similaresearch was carried out by Gribik et al
[12].
where p1 , p2 ,...,p2N are the elements of p.
When changes are small, solution for ∆x will be:
A. Mathematical Formulation
If p variables are not changed then (24) can be rewritten as:
The method of calculating the sensitivities of voltages and
currents are determined simultaneously, which are further used
to determine the changes in power flows [13]. Considering the
generalized equations of the form:
g(x,u,p) = 0
(17)
where g is 2N dimensional vector, and N is number of buses.
The variables mentioned in equation (17) can be categorized
as:
(x) are dependent (state) variables, these are the controlled
variables and they are unknown. x is a 2N dimensional vector.
(u) are independent control variables, these are the operating
variables or imposed variables of the system. u is an M
dimensional vector.
(p) are parameter variables, these are uncontrollable variables
and are normally specified in the power flow problem such as
the admittance and the loads.
Depending on the variables to be determined, the variables
in the power flow problem can be selected as x, u, and p. One
might be interested in controlling M variables out of the 2N
variables.
If x0 , u0 , and p0 are the initial state vectors, rewriting equation
(17) as:
g(x0 , u0 , p0 ) = 0
(18)
The changes ∆x corresponding to small changes ∆u and ∆p,
will satisfy the new equations:
g(x0 + ∆x, u0 + ∆u, p0 + ∆p) = 0
(19)
Expanding (19) by Taylor’s series and neglecting higher order
terms,
g(x0 +∆x, u0 +∆u, p0 +∆p) = g(x0 , u0 , p0 )+gx ∆x+gu ∆u+gp ∆p
(20)
where, gx , gu and gp are the partial derivatives of g with
respect to x, u and p respectively and are given by:
gx =
∂(g1 , g2 , ..., g2N )
∂(x1 , x2 , ..., x2N )
∂(g1 , g2 , ..., g2N )
∂(u1 , u2 , ..., uM )
(22)
∂(g1 , g2 , ..., g2N )
∂(p1 , p2 , ..., p2N )
Su = −gx −1 gu
(25)
Sp = −gx −1 gp
(26)
∆x = Su ∆u
(27)
The set of dependent and independent variables can be chosen as the system requirements and the problem formulation.
Some of the parameters of a type may belong to the set of
dependent whereas remaining parameters of same type may
belong to the set of independent variables. for instance, as bus
voltages they might be considered as independent variables
when they are at generator buses while they are considered
dependent at load buses.
B. Determination of Voltage Sensitivities at Buses
Power flow equations are comprising of 6 variables namely
P, Q, V, δ ,Y and θ. All the variables can be assumed to
be obtained or specified at the base condition. The variables
Y and θ are normally specified and are constant. The other
variables are not always constant and they are either specified
or determined, depending upon the type of buses. The variables
for which changes are specified are grouped as independent
variables and the variables which are determined against these
changes are grouped as dependent variables [13].
For the slack bus, V and δ are specified and P and Q are
subjected to change. For generator bus, P and V are specified
and Q and δ are subjected to change. For load buses, P and Q
are specified and V and δ are changed. Now consider the power
system of N buses and B branches. Power flow equations can
be described by (4, 5). There are 2N set of equations and a
set of 2N variables can be selected as state variables (x) and
remaining as control variables (u).
Consider that only M control variables are changed and for
these changes, it is desired to obtain the changes in the real
and reactive power at slack buses, reactive power and angles at
generator buses and voltages and angles at load buses. Then,
the power flow equations can be written as following:
(28)
Let
Psl , PG , PL ∈ Pi
Qsl , QG , QL ∈ Qi
Vsl , VG , VL ∈ Vi
Grouping the variables of (28) as:
where u1 , u2 ,...,uM are the elements of u.
gp =
(24)
where Su and Sp are the sensitivities of x with respect to u
and p respectively and are obtained as:
g(Vi , Vj , δi , δj , Pi , Qi , Yij , θij ) = 0
(21)
where x1 , x2 ,...,x2N are the elements of x.
gu =
∆x = Su ∆u + Sp ∆p
(23)
x = [Psl , Qsl , QG , δG , VL , δL ]
(29)
u = [Vsl , δsl , PG , VG , PL , QL ]
(30)
p = Yij , θij
(31)
From (27), the changes in dependent variables can be obtained
[∆Psl , ∆Qsl , ∆QG , ∆δG , ∆VL , ∆δL ] =
S[∆Vsl , ∆δsl , ∆PG , ∆VG , ∆PL , ∆QL ]
(32)
where S is the sensitivity matrix of order 2Nx2N and can be
obtained as given by (25). For slack bus and generator buses
following substitution can be made in (32):
∆Vsl = ∆VG = ∆δsl = 0
(33)
After determining the changes in the load bus voltages, load
bus angles and generator bus angles from (32) and with the
substitutions from (33) all the bus voltages and angles can be
arranged as:
[∆V, ∆δ] = [∆Vsl , ∆VG , ∆VL , ∆δsl , ∆δG , ∆δL ]
(34)
C. Determination of Current Sensitivities in the Lines
It is well known that the changes in voltage angles and
voltage magnitudes will cause changes in branch currents [13].
These currents in complex form can be expressed as:
Iij = Yij [Vi (cosδi + jsinδi ) − Vj (cosδj + jsinδj )]
(35)
Where Yij = |Yij |∠θij and Iij ∈ B, since B is the number of
branches. Equation (35) can be written in the form:
gij (Iij , Yij , θij , Vi , Vj , δi , δj ) = 0
(36)
Grouping the variables of (36) as
x = Iij
u = Vi , Vj , δi , δj (i.e. V and δ variables at all buses)
p = |Yij |, θij .
Sensitivities of Iij for the changes in Vi , Vj , δi , δj can be
obtained from (27) as:
∆Iij = R[∆V, ∆δ]
(37)
where R is sensitivity matrix obtained by (25) which is given
as:
−1
R = −gijx
giju
(38)
With gijx is Jacobian of gij with respect to x (i.e. Iij ).
While giju is Jacobian of gij with respect to u (i.e.
Vi , Vj , δi , δj ) Substituting from (34) and (38), the equation
(37) can be rewritten as:
A. Standard Algorithm
PSO, as an optimization tool, provides a swarm-based
search procedure in which particles change their positions with
time. In a PSO system, particles fly around in a multidimensional search space. During flight, each particle adjusts its
position according to its own experience, and the experience of
neighboring particles, making use of the best position encountered by itself and its neighbors. When improved positions are
being discovered these will then come to guide the movements
of the swarm. The process is repeated and by doing so it
is hoped, but not guaranteed, that a satisfactory solution will
eventually be discovered [10].
The following is the conventional terminology of the parameters in PSO: Let x and v denote a particle coordinates
(position) and its corresponding flight speed (velocity) in
a search space, respectively. Therefore, the ith particle is
represented as xi = [xi1 , xi2 , ...., xim ]. Since m is the last
dimension or coordinate of the position of the the ith particle
in the search space and so that d = 1, 2, ..., m.
The best previous position of the ith particle is recorded and
represented as,
pbesti = [pbesti1 , pbesti2 , ...., pbestim ].
The position of the best particle among all the particles in the
group is represented by the gbest. In a particular dimension d
there is a group best position which is gbestd.
The velocity for the ith particle is represented as,
vi = [vi1 , vi2 , ...., vid ]. The modified velocity and position
of each particle can be calculated by using the following
formulas:
k+1
k
vid
= w∗vid
+c1 ∗U ∗(pbestkid −xkid )+c2 ∗U ∗(gbestkd −xkid )
(40)
k+1
k
xk+1
=
x
+
v
(41)
id
id
id
i = 1, 2, ...., n;
d = 1, 2, ..., m
Where
n
number of particles in a group;
m
number of members in a particle;
k
pointer of iterations (generations);
w
inertia weight factor;
c1 , c2 acceleration factors;
U
uniform random number in the range [0,1];
k
xkid ,vid
the position and velocity of the ith particle in the dth
dimension at iteration k;
The search mechanism of the PSO using the modified
velocity and position of individual based on (40) and (42)
is illustrated in Fig. 1.
[∆Iij ]B×1 = [R]B×2N [∆Vsl , ∆VG , ∆VL ∆δsl , ∆δG , ∆δL ]2N×1
(39)
Where ∆Vsl = ∆VG = ∆δsl = 0.
IV. PARTICLE S WARM O PTIMIZATION A LGORITHM
The original PSO suggested by Kennedy and Eberhart is
based on the analogy of swarm of bird and school of fish
[7]. The algorithm was simplified and it was observed to be
performing a solution to an optimization problem.
Fig. 1.
PSO search mechanism
In the above procedures, the velocity should between
vdmin ≤ vid ≤ vdmax If vdmax is too high, particles might
fly past good solutions. If vdmax is too small, particles may
not explore sufficiently beyond local solutions. In many experiences with PSO, it is often set at 10 - 20% of the dynamic
range of the variable on each dimension [10].
The constants c1 and c2 represent the weighting of the
stochastic acceleration terms that pull each particle toward the
pbest and gbest positions. Low values allow particles to move
far from the target regions before being dragged back. On the
other hand, high values result in sudden movement toward, or
past, target regions. Hence, the acceleration constants c1 and
c2 are often set to be 2 according to empirical experience [10].
Suitable selection of inertia weight w in (40) provides
a balance between global and local explorations, to find a
sufficiently optimal solution. As originally developed w, often
decreases linearly from about 0.9 to 0.4 during the run. In
general, the inertia weight is set according to the following
equation:
w = wmax −
(wmax − wmin )
× iter
itermax
(42)
Where itermax is the maximum number of iterations (generations), and iter is the current number of iterations.
Start
Initialize particles with
random position and velocity
vectors
For each particle’s position
(x) evaluate objective
function (J)
If J(x) better than
J(pbest)
then pbest = x
Set best of pbest as gbest
Update
vi = ω vi + c1 U (pbesti-xi) + c2U (gbest-xi)
x i = x i + vi
o
Is Iter.=maxiter?
Is adequate objective
function reached?
Yes
Stop: giving gbest, optimal
solution
M in J(x,u)
(43)
g(x,u) = 0
(44)
h(x,u) ≤ 0
(45)
u∈U
(46)
x = [PG1 , VL , QG , Sline ]
(47)
u = [PG , VG , T, QC ]
(48)
subject to:
Where:
The equality constraint in (44) are the nonlinear power flow
equations as in (4 and 5)
The inequality constraints (45) are the functional operating
constraints, such as transmission line limits, load bus voltage
magnitude limits, generator reactive capabilities, and slack
bus active power output limits. Constraints (46) define the
feasibility region of the control variables of the problem such
as the active power output limits of the generators (except the
generator at the slack bus), generation bus voltage magnitude
limits, transformer-tap setting limits, and bus shunt admittance
limits.
Each particle in PSO is a vector containing the control
variables u, suggesting a possible solution to the OPF problem.
Then the position of the ith particle xi can be represented
as xi = ui = (ui1 , ui2 , ..., uim ), where m is the number of
dimensions and it is also represented the number of control
max
variables, d ∈ [1, m], uid ∈ [umin
id , uid ].
min
max
uid , and uid are the lower and upper bounds of uid . The
particles are moving in an m dimensional space.
For consistency’s sake, the general definition of the swarm
particle is which used in the rest of the paper, as in equations
(40 and 42). Therefore, the ith particle is represented as
xi = [xi1 , xi2 , ...., xim ] instead of ui .
Each particle attempts to minimize the following objective
function:
#
" NS
NG
X
X
µi ∗ hi (x,u)
(49)
Fi (PGi ) + λ
Jaug =
µi =
Fig. 2.
PSO algorithm flowchart
B. Implementation of PSO for OPF Problem
The primary objective of the OPF problem is to determine
the optimal combination of power outputs of all generating
units so as to meet the required load demand at minimum
operating cost while satisfying system equality and inequality
constraints.
The formulation of OPF for applying PSO is done by
separating the problem variables to state variables, x, and
control variables, u, as it was described in equations (1, 2,
and 3), they also mentioned here as follows:
i=1
i=1
Since:
1;
0;
hi (x,u) > 0
hi (x,u) ≤ 0
(50)
Here the objective function becomes unconstrained or augmented objective function by using the classical penalty functions principle. All inequality constraints in equation (45)
replaced by penalty terms. While the power balance equations
(44), which are the equality constraints, is solved for each
particle and in every iteration by Newton-Raphson power flow
algorithm, therefore no need to use a penalty function for this
equality constraint in equation (49).
Jarg is the penalized objective function and Fi (PGi ) is
the cost of the real power from the generator PGi while
λ is the penalty factor for operating constraints. µi is an
indicator of occurring any violations and work outside the
feasibility region of the solution. It has only two values as
in equation (50), it is either 1 when a violation of the limits
occurred in the corresponding constraint or 0 when there is no
violation. The penalty terms that have been used are quadratic
penalty functions as those in equation (15). Whereas N G is
the number or generators while N S is the number of the state
variables to be bounded within their limits. The penalty factor
λ is used to penalize the cost proportional to the amount of
constraint violations, the suitable value of the penalty factor
is chosen after some runs of the algorithm [19]. According to
the equations (40 and 42) in every iteration each particle of
the swarm updates its position coordinates (dimensions) until
the termination condition of the algorithm is met.
V. S TUDY C ASES
AND
S IMULATION R ESULTS
For analysis and investigation aim, the PSO is applied to find
the optimal power flow for the standard IEEE 30-bus system,
besides the implementation of the sensitivity analysis to find
the most effective control variables for solving the OPF by
PSO but in this case within a reduced space of dimensions. The
simulation is performed by MATLAB software, the flowcharts
of the main parts of simulation codes can be found in [20] .
A. The Data of The System
The system is shown in Fig. 3 and the data of the buses,
lines, and generators are given in Appendix (A). It consists
of six conventional thermal generators at buses 1, 2, 5, 8, 11,
and 13, and 41 branches, four of them are transformers with
off-nominal tap ratios in branches 6-9, 6-10, 4-12, and 28-27.
In addition, the buses 10, 12, 15, 17, 20, 21, 23, 24, and 29 are
equipped with shunt VAR compensators. The limits of control
variables are indicated in table (I). For the other operating
(state) variables such as voltages at load buses, the limits are
[0.95-1.1]. The limits of reactive power of generators QG and
the transmission lines ratings are both indicated in generator
data and line data tables respectively in Appendix (A).
TABLE I
C ONTROL VARIABLES AND THEIR LIMITS
The control variable
PG1
(MW)
PG2
(MW)
PG3
(MW)
PG4
(MW)
PG5
(MW)
PG6
(MW)
VGs
The upper limit
The lower limit
200
50
80
20
50
15
35
10
30
10
40
12
0.95
1.1
(pu)
Ts
Qshs
(MVAR)
0.9
1.1
0
5
Ts: transformer tap ratio; VGs: voltage at generator bus; Qsh: VAR compensation.
B. The PSO Algorithm and Its Parameters for Solving OPF
The skeleton of PSO algorithm is taken form these references [21], [22] after it has been modified for solving OPF.
Initially several runs are carried out besides to the helpful
information from [8], [9], [10] to select the suitable parameters
for PSO algorithm. The inertia weight is decreasing linearly
with iterations from its initial value at 0.9 to its ultimate value
at 0.4, while the acceleration factors C1 and C2 are equal to 2
and the number of particles is 10. The termination condition
occurs when the 5 significant digits after the decimal point of
the optimal solution have not changed for last 50 iterations,
the algorithm will then consider this as an optimal solution. In
Fig. 3.
Single-line diagram of IEEE 30-bus test system [8]
addition, the maximum number of iterations after which the
algorithm also terminates is 500.
C. The Objective Function
The objective function is to minimize the operating cost of
the system as in equation (49) which is used in PSO algorithm
and its constraints are represented by (50).
The penalty functions are quadratic penalty functions as
those in equation (15) and its constraints as (16).
D. Study of Base Case
The running power flow of the initial operating point, which
is the base case of loading and it is given in bus data table
in Appendix (A), yielding violations in the lower limit of
voltage at load buses 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,
27, 29, 30. There is no violation for bus 28 although it is
also far from generators, that because this bus is fed by two
branches and one of them directly from generator at bus 8.
Furthermore, there is a rating violation of the transmission
line which connects the buses 1 and 2.
Let’s first apply PSO algorithm with all of control variables
(i.e. PGs , VGs , Ts , and Qshs ) for solving the optimal power
flow (OPF) of this base case of loading (283.4M W ) . For
sure, in this case all the violations can be easily alleviated
and the voltage at load buses and the transmission lines rating
within their limits as they are shown in Fig. 4. The cost of the
real output power of generators is minimized to 798.43 $/hr
as it is illustrated in table (II).
By adjusting the voltages at both ends of the transmission line
within their limits, the rating constraint of the transmission line
1-2 is alleviated as well for this branch.
TABLE II
G ENERATORS OUTPUTS OF BASE CASE (283.4 M W )
combination is done in PSO for adjusting the violations
in operating constraints of the power system by using less
number of dimensions. When control variables increase the
PG1
(MW)
PG2
(MW)
PG3
(MW)
PG4
(MW)
PG5
(MW)
PG6
(MW)
Losses
(MW)
Cost
($/hr)
176.94
48.71
21.27
21.09
11.83
12.00
8.4382
798.43
TABLE III
R ANKED CONTROL VARIABLES FOR VIOLATED VOLTAGES OF LOAD BUSES
AT B ASE C ASE
1.15
Upper limit
1.1
P.U.
1.05
1
Lower limit 0.95
0.9
VL3
VL4
VL6
VL7
VL9 VL10 VL12 VL14 VL15 VL16 VL17 VL18 VL19 VL20 VL21 VL22 VL23 VL24 VL25 VL26 VL27 VL28 VL29 VL30
Load Bus Voltages
Fig. 4.
Voltage levels at load buses for base case of IEEE 30-bus system
VL19
V8
V2
V1
V5
V11
T9
T27
V13
T12
Qsh23
Qsh29
T10
Qsh24
Qsh12
Qsh15
Qsh20
Qsh17
Qsh21
Qsh10
VL20
T27
V5
V8
V2
V1
V11
T9
V13
T12
T10
Qsh29
Qsh24
Qsh23
Qsh17
Qsh21
Qsh10
Qsh12
Qsh20
Qsh15
VL21
V2
V8
V1
V5
T27
V11
T9
V13
T12
Qsh29
Qsh23
T10
Qsh15
Qsh12
Qsh20
Qsh17
Qsh24
Qsh10
Qsh21
VL22
T27
V1
V2
V5
V8
V13
T12
V11
T9
Qsh29
Qsh23
T10
Qsh15
Qsh12
Qsh24
Qsh21
Qsh20
Qsh17
Qsh10
VL23
V1
V2
V8
V5
T27
Qsh29
V11
T9
V13
T12
T10
Qsh20
Qsh21
Qsh17
Qsh12
Qsh10
Qsh24
Qsh15
Qsh23
VL24
V8
V5
V2
V1
V11
T9
T27
T10
V13
T12
Qsh15
Qsh17
Qsh20
Qsh29
Qsh12
Qsh23
Qsh10
Qsh21
Qsh24
VL25
V1
V5
V2
V13
T12
V8
V11
T9
T10
Qsh20
Qsh15
T27
Qsh12
Qsh17
Qsh23
Qsh29
Qsh24
Qsh21
Qsh10
VL26
V8
V2
V5
V1
V13
T12
T10
V11
T9
Qsh15
Qsh23
T27
Qsh12
Qsh17
Qsh20
Qsh24
Qsh21
Qsh29
Qsh10
VL27
T27
V13
T12
Qsh23
Qsh29
Qsh24
V1
V2
V8
V5
T10
Qsh15
V11
T9
Qsh12
Qsh20
Qsh17
Qsh21
Qsh10
VL29
V8
V1
V2
V5
V13
T12
Qsh23
V11
T9
T10
Qsh15
T27
Qsh24
Qsh12
Qsh17
Qsh20
Qsh29
Qsh21
Qsh10
VL30
V8
V1
V2
V5
V13
T12
V11
T9
T10
Qsh15
T27
Qsh29
Qsh12
Qsh23
Qsh24
Qsh20
Qsh17
Qsh21
Qsh10
E. Implementation of Sensitivity Analysis With PSO
Firstly, the sensitivity analysis of optimal power flow is
conducted for the base case to find the sensitivity matrices of
the voltage and the current and to select the most effective
control variables to adjust the violations in the OPF at the
base case within a less-dimensions space of PSO algorithm.
The mathematical approaches of calculating the sensitivity
matrices of voltage Su and current R are discussed in (III-B
and III-C), the resulting rank of state and control variables,
in addition to the visualized sparsity pattern of elements
in matrices Su and R are shown in Fig. 5a and Fig. 5b
respectively.
The sensitivity analysis of voltages
Ěϭϰ
Ěϭϱ
Ěϭϲ
Ěϭϳ
Ěϭϴ
Ěϭϵ
ĚϮϬ
ĚϮϭ
ĚϮϮ
ĚϮϯ
ĚϮϰ
ĚϮϱ
ĚϮϲ
ĚϮϳ
ĚϮϴ
ĚϮϵ
ĚϯϬ
sϯ
sϰ
The sensitivity analysis of Currents
Su=-Jx-1Ju
∆x
WŐϭ
YŐϭ
YŐϮ
YŐϱ
YŐϴ
YŐϭϭ
YŐϭϯ
ĚϮ
Ěϯ
Ěϰ
Ěϱ
Ěϲ
Ěϳ
Ěϴ
Ěϵ
ĚϭϬ
Ěϭϭ
ĚϭϮ
Ěϭϯ
sϲ
sϳ
sϭϰ
sϭϱ
sϭϲ
sϭϳ
sϭϴ
sϭϵ
sϮϬ
sϮϭ
sϮϮ
sϮϯ
sϮϰ
sϮϱ
sϮϲ
sϮϴ
sϮϵ
sϯϬ
∆u
WŐϮ
WŐϱ
WŐϴ
WŐϭϭ
WŐϭϯ
sŐϭ
sŐϮ
sŐϱ
sŐϴ
sŐϭϭ
sŐϭϯ
dϵ
dϭϬ
dϭϮ
dϮϳ
YƐŚϭϬ
YƐŚϭϮ
YƐŚϭϱ
YƐŚϭϳ
YƐŚϮϬ
YƐŚϮϭ
YƐŚϮϯ
YƐŚϮϰ
YƐŚϮϵ
0
10
20
30
40
50
0
5
10
15
nz = 1344
20
25
R=-Jx-1Ju
∆x
I16_17
I15_18
I18_19
I19_20
I10_20
I10_17
I10_21
I10_22
I21_22
I15_23
I22_24
I23_24
I24_25
I25_26
I25_27
I28_27
I27_29
I27_30
I29_30
I8_28
I6_28
I1_2
I1_3
I2_4
I3_4
I2_5
I2_6
I4_6
I5_7
I6_7
I6_8
I6_9
I6_10
I9_11
I9_10
I4_12
I12_13
I12_14
I12_15
I12_16
I14_15
∆u
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
0
10
20
30
nz = 164
40
50
60
V1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
V30
d1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
d30
Where d stands for phase-angle of bus voltage (į).
(a) Voltage sensitivity matrix Su
Where I1-2 stands for the power flow in the branch (1-2).
(b) Current sensitivity matrix R
Fig. 5. Sensitivity matrices and their state ∆x and control ∆u variables
at base case 283.4M W
dimensions of the particles in PSO algorithm also increase and
that can cause a complexity for manipulating the dimensions of
the particles [9]. Thereby, finding and using the most effective
control variables to adjust and correct the violations can
decrease the dimensions in PSO and enhance its performance.
F. PSO Solution for Base Case Using Most Effective Control
Variables
Now let’s using only the most effective control variables
to adjust the violations in initial operating point of IEEE
30-bus system. Several combinations of dominant control
variables (as they are ranked in table (III)) can be chosen,
some of them are sufficient combination to bring back the
violations in the voltage at load buses within their limits for
base case of 283.4 M W loading level. The PSO’s results
with the combinations of most effective control variables are
listed in table (IV). As it is shown in table (IV), except
TABLE IV
PSO RESULT OF COMBINATIONS OF MOST EFFECTIVE CONTROL
VARIABLES AT BASE CASE
Table (III) presents the most dominant control variables for
every violated bus voltage are ranked from top to down at base
case.
Notice that the real power of generators Pgs are not listed
in Table (III) because they are also used in the OPF solution
search by PSO algorithm to find the minimum cost, although
Pgs are effectively contributing in adjusting the violations
since the constraints are augmented with the main objective
function of OPF as in (49).
This order of control variables are achieved by sensitivity
analysis between the voltage sensitivity matrix Su and its
corresponding column vectors of state and control variables.
Once the control variables that have most effect on state
variables are determined and ranked from the most powerful
to the less. Next to that, the selection of these control variable
Case
283.4MW
283.4MW
283.4MW
283.4MW
283.4MW
283.4MW
283.4MW
Violation
VL18…30, Sline1
VL18…30, Sline1
VL18…30, Sline1
VL18…30, Sline1
VL18…30, Sline1
VL18…30, Sline1
VL18…30, Sline1
*
Control variables
(**Pgs ), (Vg1, Vg5, Vg8)
(Pgs ), (Vg1, Vg2, Vg8)
(Pgs ), (Vg1, Vg2, Vg5, Vg8, Vg13)
(Pgs ), (Vg1, Vg2, Vg8), (T27)
(Pgs ), (Vg1, Vg2, Vg5, Vg8)
(Pgs ), (Vgs)
All (i.e. Pgs, Vgs, Ts, Qshs)
Still exist violations
VL26, VL30, Sline10
VL30, Sline10
VL30
-----------------
Cost
818.92
805.51
800.17
802.41
800.22
799.86
798.43
* VL18…30 stands for violations at buses 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 29, 30.
** Pgs stands for all real power of generators except the first generator at slack bus.
the case of using all control variables, it’s obvious that the
control variables combination of Pgs and Vgs is the most
effective with minimized cost 799.86 $/hr. While for other
less number of control variables, the combination of most
effective control variables of Pgs , Vg1 , Vg2 , Vg5 and Vg8 and
the other of Pgs , Vg1 , Vg2 , Vg8 and T27 succeed to adjust all
violations, but the former combination produces lower cost
800.22 $/hr.
G. PSO Solution for Different Loading Levels
For IEEE 30-bus test system with other cases of loading,
higher and lower than the base case, PSO is used with only
the most effective control variables to adjust the violations, if
they exist. The results are shown in table (V).
ϮϱDt
dŚĞŐĞŶĞƌĂƚŽƌŽƵƚƉƵƚƐƐĞƚĂƚƚŚĞŝƌůŽǁĞƌůŝŵŝƚƐсϭϭϳDt
TABLE V
PSO RESULT FOR SEVERAL LOADING CASES OF IEEE 30- BUS TEST
SYSTEM
Total loading
Violation
Control variables
Cost
125MW
----
(*Pgs )
309.060
150MW
VL30
(Pgs ), Vg1, Vg2, Vg8
374.577
200MW
VL26, VL29, VL30
(Pgs ), Vg1, Vg2, Vg5, Vg8
517.827
250MW
----
(Pgs )
681.602
275MW
Sline1
(Pgs ), Vg1, Vg2
769.947
300MW
Sline1
(Pgs ), Vg1, Vg2
861.65
325MW
VL26, VL30, Sline1
(Pgs ), Vg1, Vg2, Vg5, Vg8, Vg13
956.922
VL26, VL29, VL30, Sline1
(Pgs ), Vg1, Vg2, Vg5, Vg8, Vg11,
Vg13, T9, T10, T12, Qsh15
1058.605
350MW
effort is needed for PSO algorithm and enhancing its performance, especially for large systems including many stochastic
generation resources.
The following could be included for further work: PSO
algorithm needs some work on selecting proper parameters
and it also needs more accurate mathematical description
for its convergence. PSO can be applied in wind power
bid marketing between electric power operators. In addition
to operating cost, the environment effects and security or
risk of wind power penetration can be included by using
multi-objective models. Using singular value decomposition
and pseudo-inverse techniques could be considered for further
study to find the effective control variables.
A PPENDIX
A. The Data for IEEE 30-Bus Test System
The data for IEEE 30-bus test system as following [23]:
* Pgs stands for Pg2, Pg5, Pg8, Pg11, and Pg13.
Note: Every OPF solution of the previous loading case
is considered
an initial operating point for the following
Ϯϴϯ͘ϰDt asŽƐƚсϴϬϬ
loading case. for example, if the OPF of the loading case 125
M
W has been solved then the OPF of the successive loading
EŽŐƵĂƌĂŶƚĞĞŽĨǁŚŝĐŚƐĞůĞĐƚŝŽŶƚŚĂƚǁŽƵůĚǁŽƌŬĂƐŝŶĐĂƐĞϯϬϬDtƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐĐŽŵďŝŶĂƚŝŽŶŚĂǀĞ
ďĞĞŶƐĞůĞĐƚĞĚ;
Vg1, W
Vg2, Vg5,
Vg8ͿďƵƚƚŚĞǀŝŽůĂƚŝŽŶƐǁĞƌĞŶŽƚĐŽƌƌĞĐƚĞĚ;
Vg2, Vg5, Vg8,
Vg13) Žƌ
case
150 M
considers
the solution of theVg1,
previous
loading
Vg1, Vg2, Vg5, Vg8,Vg13, T12ͿŽƌ;Vg1, Vg2, Vg5, Vg8, Vg11, Vg13, T12)
case
125 M W as its initial point and so on.
VzŽƵŬŶŽǁǁŚŝĐŚĞůĞŵĞŶƚŚĂƐƚŚĞŵŽƐƚĞĨĨĞĐƚďƵƚƵĐĂŶŶŽƚŬŶŽǁǁŚŝĐŚĐŽŵďŝŶĂƚŝŽŶƚŚĂƚǁŝůůǁŽƌŬ͊
L26 , VL29 , and VL30 are the weakest buses in the system that
are susceptible to violations more than other buses. While the
transmission line that connect bus 1 and bus 2 is the weakest
transmission line and it suffers from violation of its rating
for several loading cases. In the last case 350 M W a variety
of control variables are needed to keep the system in secure
operation, but they are still less than using all control variables.
Bus No.
Bus Code*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
1
2
0
0
2
0
0
2
0
0
2
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
DATA OF
TABLE VI
IEEE 30- BUS TEST SYSTEM
Voltage
Angle
PL
QL
PG#
Q G#
Q G_low
Q G_high
Q sh
(pu)
(pu)
(MW)
(MVAR)
(MW)
(MVAR)
(MVAR)
(MVAR)
(MVAR)
1.05
1.04
1
1
1.01
1
1
1.01
1
1
1.05
1
1.05
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
21.7
2.4
7.6
94.2
0
22.8
30
0
5.8
0
11.2
0
6.2
8.2
3.5
9
3.2
9.5
2.2
17.5
0
3.2
8.7
0
3.5
0
0
2.4
10.6
0
12.7
1.2
1.6
19
0
10.9
30
0
2
0
7.5
0
1.6
2.5
1.8
5.8
0.9
3.4
0.7
11.2
0
1.6
6.7
0
2.3
0
0
0.9
1.9
0
80
0
0
50
0
0
20
0
0
20
0
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-20
-20
0
0
-15
0
0
-15
0
0
-10
0
-15
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
250
100
0
0
80
0
0
60
0
0
50
0
60
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
* Bus code: 1 for slack bus; 2 for PV bus; 0 for Load bus.
#These generators' Data are an initial guess.
376.2
376
961
375.8
960
375.6
959
375.4
Cost
Cost
B US
375.2
TABLE VII
G ENERATORS DATA OF IEEE 30- BUS TEST SYSTEM
958
957
375
956
374.8
955
374.6
374.4
Gen. No.
954
0
100
200
300
400
500
20
40
Iterations
80
100
120
140
160
Iterations
(a) 150 M W
Fig. 6.
60
(b) 325 M W
Cost vs. iterations of two loading cases
1
2
5
8
11
13
a
b
($/MW^2.Hr)
($/MW.Hr)
0.00375
0.0175
0.0625
0.00834
0.025
0.025
2
1.75
1
3.25
3
3
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
PG_low
PG_high
(MW)
(MW)
50
20
15
10
10
12
200
80
50
35
30
40
VI. C ONCLUSION
The implementation of PSO algorithm to solve the OPF
problem is useful and worth of investigation. Moreover, PSO
algorithm is easy to apply and simple since it has fewer
number of parameters to deal with, comparing to other modern
optimization algorithms. In addition, PSO algorithm is appropriate for solving the optimal power flow for systems that
include variable generation resources. Using most effective
control variables by applying sensitivity analysis reducing the
space dimensions of PSO and hence improving the computing
R EFERENCES
[1] A. J. Wood and B. F. Wollenberg, Power Generation, Operation and
Control. New York: Wiley, 2nd ed., 1996.
[2] X.-F. Wang, Y.-H. Song, and M. Irving, Modern Power Systems Analysis.
Springer, 2008.
[3] C.-R. Wang, H.-J. Yuan, Z.-Q. Huang, J.-W. Zhang, and C.-J. Sun,
“A modified particle swarm optimization algorithm and its application
in optimal power flow problem,” in Proc. Int Machine Learning and
Cybernetics Conf, vol. 5, pp. 2885–2889, 2005.
TABLE VIII
L INE DATA OF IEEE 30- BUS TEST SYSTEM
Branch o.
From Bus
To Bus
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
1
1
2
3
2
2
4
5
6
6
6
6
9
9
4
12
12
12
12
14
16
15
18
19
10
10
10
10
21
15
22
23
24
25
25
28
27
27
29
8
6
2
3
4
4
5
6
6
7
7
8
9
10
11
10
12
13
14
15
16
15
17
18
19
20
20
17
21
22
22
23
24
24
25
26
27
27
29
30
30
28
28
B
Transformer
Ratings
(pu)
(pu)
(pu)
(turnns ratio)
(MVA)
0.0192
0.0452
0.057
0.0132
0.0472
0.0581
0.0119
0.046
0.0267
0.012
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.1231
0.0662
0.0945
0.221
0.0824
0.1073
0.0639
0.034
0.0936
0.0324
0.0348
0.0727
0.0116
0.1
0.115
0.132
0.1885
0.2544
0.1093
0
0.2198
0.3202
0.2399
0.0636
0.0169
0.0575
0.1852
0.1737
0.0379
0.1983
0.1763
0.0414
0.116
0.082
0.042
0.208
0.556
0.208
0.11
0.256
0.14
0.2559
0.1304
0.1987
0.1997
0.1923
0.2185
0.1292
0.068
0.209
0.0845
0.0749
0.1499
0.0236
0.202
0.179
0.27
0.3292
0.38
0.2087
0.396
0.4153
0.6027
0.4533
0.2
0.0599
0.0264
0.0204
0.0184
0.0042
0.0209
0.0187
0.0045
0.0102
0.0085
0.0045
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0214
0.0065
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1.078
1.069
1
1
1.032
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1.068
1
1
1
1
1
130
130
65
130
130
65
90
70
130
32
65
32
65
65
65
65
32
32
32
16
16
16
16
32
32
32
32
32
32
16
16
16
16
16
16
65
16
16
16
32
32
R
X
[4] J. Hetzer, D. C. Yu, and K. Bhattarai, “An economic dispatch model
incorporating wind power,” vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 603–611, 2008.
[5] J. G. Vlachogiannis and K. Y. Lee, “Economic load dispatch—a comparative study on heuristic optimization techniques with an improved
coordinated aggregation-based pso,” vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 991–1001, 2009.
[6] M. R. AlRashidi, M. F. AlHajri, and M. E. El-Hawary, “Enhanced particle swarm optimization approach for solving the non-convex optimal
power flow,” World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology,
vol. 62, pp. 651–655, 2010.
[7] J. Kennedy and R. Eberhart, “Particle swarm optimization,” in Proc.
Conf. IEEE Int Neural Networks, vol. 4, pp. 1942–1948, 1995.
[8] M. A. Abido, “Optimal power flow using particle swarm optimization,”
International Journal of Electrical Power Energy Systems, vol. 24, no. 7,
pp. 563–571, 2002.
[9] P. N. Biskas, N. P. Ziogos, A. Tellidou, C. E. Zoumas, A. G. Bakirtzis,
V. Petridis, and A. Tsakoumis, “Comparison of two metaheuristics with
mathematical programming methods for the solution of opf,” in Proc.
13th Int Intelligent Systems Application to Power Systems Conf, 2005.
[10] Z.-L. Gaing, “Particle swarm optimization to solving the economic
dispatch considering the generator constraints,” vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 1187–
1195, 2003.
[11] J. Peschon, D. S. Piercy, W. F. Tinney, and O. J. Tveit, “Sensitivity in
power systems,” no. 8, pp. 1687–1696, 1968.
[12] P. R. Gribik, D. Shirmohammadi, S. Hao, and C. L. Thomas, “Optimal
power flow sensitivity analysis,” vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 969–976, 1990.
[13] N. D. Ghawghawe and K. L. Thakre, “Application of power flow
sensitivity analysis and ptdf for determination of atc,” in Proc. Int. Conf.
Power Electronics, Drives and Energy Systems PEDES ’06, pp. 1–7,
2006.
[14] Y. Tamura, H. Mori, and S. Iwamoto, “Relationship between voltage
instability and multiple load flow solutions in electric power systems,”
Power Apparatus and Systems, IEEE Transactions on, no. 5, pp. 1115–
1125, 1983.
[15] C. L. DeMarco and T. J. Overbye, “An energy based security measure
for assessing vulnerability to voltage collapse,” Power Systems, IEEE
Transactions on, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 419–427, 1990.
[16] P. Löf, T. Smed, G. Andersson, and D. Hill, “Fast calculation of a voltage
stability index,” Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 7, no. 1,
pp. 54–64, 1992.
[17] B. Gao, G. Morison, and P. Kundur, “Voltage stability evaluation using
modal analysis,” Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 7, no. 4,
pp. 1529–1542, 1992.
[18] X. Wei, Y. Liu, and D. Zhao, “Review of dynamic dispatch research
considering intermittent power generation,” in Proc. Asia-Pacific Power
and Energy Engineering Conf. (APPEEC), pp. 1–5, 2011.
[19] A. I. Selvakumar and K. Thanushkodi, “A new particle swarm optimization solution to nonconvex economic dispatch problems,” vol. 22, no. 1,
pp. 42–51, 2007.
[20] M. A. Abuella, “Study of particle swarm for optimal power flow in ieee
benchmark systems including wind power generators,” 2012.
[21] W.-N. Lee, Y.-W. Jeong, J.-B. Park, J.-R. Shin, and K. Y. Lee, “Development of an educational simulator for particle swarm optimization and
economic dispatch applications,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Intelligent Systems
Applications to Power Systems ISAP 2007Lee2007, pp. 1–6, 2007.
[22] B. Birge, “Psot - a particle swarm optimization toolbox for use with
matlab,” in Swarm Intelligence Symposium, 2003. SIS ’03. Proceedings
of the 2003 IEEE, pp. 182 – 186, april 2003.
[23] O. Alsac and B. Stott, “Optimal load flow with steady-state security,”
Power Apparatus and Systems, IEEE Transactions on, vol. PAS-93,
pp. 745 –751, may 1974.
BIOGRAPHIES
Mohamed A. Abuella (IEEE student member). He is a PhD student at
University of North Carolina at Charlotte. He received his Bachelor’s degree
from College of industrial Technology, Misurata, Libya in 2008, and MSc
degree from Southern Illinois University Carbondale in 2012. His research
interests are in planning and operations of power systems.
C.J. Hatziadoniu (IEEE M’87, SM’06). He is a professor of electrical and
computer engineering at Southern Illinois University Carbondale. His research
interests include power systems control and protection and application of
power electronics to power systems.
| 3cs.SY
|
Register Allocation By Model Transformer
Semantics
by Yin Wang, R. Kent Dybvig
Indiana University
Abstract
Register allocation has long been formulated as a graph coloring problem, coloring
the conflict graph with physical registers. Such a formulation does not fully capture
the goal of the allocation, which is to minimize the traffic between registers and
memory. Linear scan has been proposed as an alternative to graph coloring, but in
essence, it can be viewed as a greedy algorithm for graph coloring: coloring the vertices not in the order of their degrees, but in the order of their occurence in the program. Thus it suffers from almost the same constraints as graph coloring. In this
article, I propose a new method of register allocation based on the ideas of model
transformer semantics (MTS) and static cache replacement (SCR). Model transformer semantics captures the semantics of registers and the stack. Static cache
replacement relaxes the assumptions made by graph coloring and linear scan, aiming
directly at reducing register-memory traffic. The method explores a much larger solution space than that of graph coloring and linear scan, thus providing more opportunities of optimization. It seamlessly performs live range splitting, an optimization
found in extensions to graph coloring and linear scan. Also, it simplifies the compiler,
and its semantics-based approach provides possibilities of simplifying the formal verification of compilers.
1 Introduction
Register allocation is a central problem of compiler construction and a profittable optimization in a compiler. The quality of the code generated by register allocation has a
huge impact on the runtime performance. Thus a major part of compiler research has
been devoted to this problem. Since Chaitin’s seminal paper [2], register allocation has
been identified with graph coloring [3], a famous NP-Complete problem. Since then,
researches have been mainly to improve and extend graph coloring algorithms, without
questioning the assumptions it makes. This trend has only recently been challenged by
linear scan [5], which is supposedly more efficient than graph coloring in compilation
speed, and thus attracted much attention because of the rise of JIT (just-in-time) compilers. However, the original linear scan algorithm [5] generates slower code than graph
coloring. Only with extensions such as live range splitting [7] can linear scan outperform
the vanilla graph coloring algorithm. Linear scan is not very different from graph coloring. In fact, it can be viewed as a particular graph coloring algorithm. Instead of
looking at the vertices in the order of their degrees as in Chaitin’s heauristics, linear
scan looks at the vertices in the order of their occurrences in the input program. This
explains why linear scan (without extensions) does not outperform graph coloring.
In this article, I propose a method for register allocation that sets itself apart from
graph coloring and linear scan. The goal is to provide another practical method and at
the same time relate the major register allocation methods together in a principled
1
2
Section 2
way—explaining and predicting their advantages and drawbacks not by benchmarks, but
by reasoning. The method is based on the so-called model transformer semantics (MTS)
and static cache replacement (SCR). The two aspects of the method are indispensible
with respect to each other and work in a seamless fashion. For convenience, in the rest
of this article, we will call these two aspects of the method collectively “the MTS
method” or just “MTS”.
In short, a model is an abstract representation of the physical machine. For example,
a model may specify that at a certain program point the variable x must be located in
register r2. A model transformer is a rule that specifies how the models relate to each
other. For example, a model transformer may specify that after the instruction x 6 y +
1, the variable y, wherever it had been located, will be loaded into some register that is
not occupied by any other variable. A model transformer semantics is thus a set of
model transformers dispatched by the syntax of the intermediate language. In essence, it
is an abstract interpreter of the intermediate language. It is also a special kind of logic
(similar to Hoare Logic and linear logic), but instead of having a syntax and inference
rules, it encodes the logic formulas directly into data structures (models) which entail
the static properties of the machine. As long as the models faithfully reflect the machine
configurations at every program point in an actual run, the model transformer semantics
is said to be “sound”. This has essentially the same meaning as the soundness of a logic.
A crucial feature of the MTS method is that it has access to a larger solution
space—it can generate correct code which graph coloring and linear scan will never consider, thus opens the door to further optimizations. This improvement is mainly due to
the use of static cache replacement. In fact, graph coloring and linear scan are making
overly restrictive assumptions about the generated code, thus limiting their solution
space. One example is that they assume that once a variable is allocated to a register, it
stays in that register for its whole life. But actually a variable may stay in a register for
a while, then be saved to the stack, and later be loaded back into a (possibly different)
register. Thus the assumptions made by graph coloring and linear scan unnecessarily
limit the possible forms of generated code. Also, they prevent an important optimization, live range splitting, from being naturally included into the register allocator. As we
shall see in this article, MTS is based on fewer assumptions, and can thus generate more
flexible code. Moreover, it includes live range splitting in the same pass as register allocation in a seamless fashion. This not only makes the compiler simple, but also makes
live range splitting “online”. In contrast, most of the live range splitting extensions to
graph coloring and linear scan are “offline”—done in a separate pass.
2 The Big Picture
The high-level theme of the MTS method is to treat the register file as a “cache” for the
stack. The traffic between registers and memory is thus analogous to cache replacement.
Both the registers and stack locations may contain variables, but access to the registers
is more efficient and is often required by the instruction set architecture. So the goal is
to keep variables in registers as long as possible, place them in the stack when necessary,
and try to minimize register-memory traffic.
3
The Big Picture
Meanwhile, the static information contained in the models is used to generate
instructions to move variables into and out of registers. Bacause these instructions are
computed at compile time, this is called static cache replacement , as opposed to
dynamic cache replacement that is used by the processor’s memory cache.
2.1 The Input Language
The input language (named UIL) is very simple but expressive enough for most imperative programming constructs.
Program → letrec (Definition ∗ ) Statement ∗
Definition → f : λxyz. Statement ∗
Statement → s1; Statement ∗
| x← y
| x← y +z
| x ← [y + z]
| [x + y] ← z
| if t then Statement ∗ else Statement ∗
| f (x, y, z)
| v
A program consists of a list of definitions and a list of statements. Definitions are procedures which may take zero or more arguments and return a value. A statement may be
an assignment, an arithmetic operation, a memory read, a memory write, a branching
statement, or a procedure call. Note that this language is basically the first-order language one would get from a functional language after a closure conversion and a CPS
(or A-normal form) transformation, where no nested expressions and definitions are
involved.
2.2 Two Pass Register Allocation
The register allocator contains only two passes, a backward liveness analysis which
uncovers live range endings, and a forward abstract interpretation pass which performs
model transformations and static cache replacement at the same time, and rewrites the
code into its final register form.
Unlike liveness analysis for graph coloring or linear scan, we do not need to build an
inference graph, thus the liveness analysis pass only has to mark the endings of the live
ranges. An example output from the liveness analysis looks like:
x
y
z
←
0, {}
←
x + 1, {}
←
y + 2, {y }
fxz, {f , x, z }
4
Section 3
For each statement, the variables whose live range ends are included in the ending set.
For example, the ending set of z ← y + 2 is {y }, because y will no longer be used after
this statement. The ending set ressembles the ending scoping delimiter such as “(let ...)”
in a functional language. It enables the abstract interpreter to remove the variable bindings from the environment.
2.3 Names
The whole allocation process can be thought of as a game of allocating registers to
names in the intermediate language program. This is because names and registers are
essentially the same: they bind to values and carry them at runtime. But because we
have limited number of registers, we must reuse them if we are going to “simulate” the
names with registers.
MTS does not require the input to be in the SSA form, because the allocation pass
will implicitly perform single assignment renaming: when a variable is assigned, its old
binding in the allocation will be removed, and new binding created. The following statements will then be rewritten using the new binding, effectively does a renaming.
Also unlike the SSA form, the same name can be assigned in both branches of a
branching statement, for example,
if x > 0
then y ← 1
z←2
else
z←1
y←2
If the two branches result in different allocations, a sequence of shuffling instructions
must be inserted under one of the branches in order to bring the two different allocations together. Although the shuffling code can be short, we may want to eliminate it by
passing a map of “preferred allocations” for variables already allocated from one branch,
so that we can try allocating them to the same registers in another branch.
3 Model
The general defintion of a model is an abstract representation of the real world. Usually,
a model only represents a few aspects of the real world, but faithfully. As an alternative
point of view, a type in a modern type system can be thought of as a model—a model
which reflects the possible domain of values of an expression.
In the context of this article, a model is an abstraction of the physical processor, a
data structure whose contents reflects the actual machine configuration when the code
executes on a physical processor. An example of such a model looks like
{x: r1, y : r2}{z : fv0}.
5
Model
This is essentially an environment in an abstract interpreter where each variable has a
binding to a location. This particular model says that variable x is located in register
r1, variable y is located in register r2, and variable z is located in stack location fv0.
(We use the convention fvi to denote the stack location which is at offset i from the
stack pointer.) This is basically a map between variables and locations, but notice that
this map is split into two parts that models the register file and the stack separately.
This splitting is important because a variable may be located both in a register and a
stack location at the same time. For example, x can live in both register r1 and stack
location fv0, as in the following model.
{x: r1, y : r2}{x: fv0, z : fv1}
The purpose of having the variables multi-homing is that we can optimize away some
saves when the variable is already saved in the stack.
A model is currently represented in the prototype compiler as an association list, but
other pure mapping data structure such balanced trees can also be used for efficiency
purposes. Note that a model is a shared structure and should not be destructively modified.
3.1 Initial Model
The allocation process is on a procedure-by-procedure basis, so one may wonder how we
get an initial model to start the allocation process. The answer is calling conventions.
There are many kinds of calling conventions for various languages. Here we discuss
just the one implemented in the prototype compiler, which turns out to be quite general.
Basically, we can think of each UIL procedure as a procedure that takes one additional
argument, the return address. We will see that this high-level view simplifies the
problem of setting up calls.
The initial model tells us where the arguments (including the return address) are
located. It is generated on a procedure-by-procedure basis by a helper function. First of
all, we put as many arguments as possible into registers. The rest go into stack locations. There is a special name in the initial model, RET, which denotates the return
address. Initially it is bound to the return address register, but may be rebound later.
An example initial model looks like
{x: r1, y : r2, z : fv0, RET : r0},
where r0 is assumed to be a dedicated return address register.
An advantage of treating the return address uniformly with other arguments is that
the register used by the return address may be evacuated for other purposes when we
run out of registers. An alternative would be to save the return address into the stack,
and then restore it to the return address register just before the procedure returns. But
we are wasting our time saving and restore the return address if we have enough registers in the procedure. Treating the return address as a normal variable can naturally
eliminate this overhead when possible.
6
Section 4
4 Model Transformers
Model transformers relate models to each other. They may take arguments in addition
to the model itself. The arguments may contain directions as how to transform the
model. All model transformers are of similar types:
(Model, ExtraArgs,
) → (Model, [Inst],
).
That is, a transformer takes as input a model and some extra arguments, and it produces a new model and a list of necessary instructions for transforming the model.
The list of instructions may contain arbitrary machine instructions such as SAVE,
LOAD or MOVE, which can essentially perform live range splitting at appropriet places,
as we shall see later on.
4.1 Primitive Model Transformers
There are two kinds of model transformers, primitive transoformers and compound
transformers. Primitive transformers are basically helpers for the compound transformers. The compound transformers dispatch on the syntax of the intermediate language. There are only three primitive model transformers: save, load, and shuffle.
save : : (Model, [Var]) → (Model, [Inst])
load : : (Model, [Var]) → (Model, [Inst])
shuffle : : (Model, [(Loc, Loc)]) → (Model, [Inst])
The similarity in these three operations is that they all do something “in parallel” on
multiple elements (variables or locations), so care must be taken when there are data
dependencies between the source and the destination. The functionalities of the first two
primitives are almost obvious, but they also contain optimizations for reducing memory
traffic.
•
save. Save a list of variables into stack. Try to find each variable in the stack
first. If the variable is already in the stack, skip the saving (emitting no instructions) and return the model intact. Otherwise, find an unoccupied stack location
and bind the variable to that location. Leave the orginal binding of the variable
with the register alone. After saving, the variable lives in both the register and
the stack.
•
load. Load a list of variables into registers. If a variable is in a register, do
nothing but passing on the model. Otherwise the variable is in stack. Emit
instructions to load the variable into an unoccupied register, return the updated
model which binds the variable to both a register and a stack location. If we run
out of registers, some variable must be chosen as an victim to be evicted from
registers. We save the victim to a stack location and load the new variable into
the victim’s home. Note that care must be taken when loading multiple variables
in order to prevent the variables in the list to evict each other.
The way we choose victims is a crucial decision which has impact on the register-memory traffic. This is similar to the different cache replacing policies in the
processor’s memory cache. We delay the discussion of this topic to a later section.
7
Model Transformers
•
shuffle. Take a mapping of locations, for example {r0 → r1, r1 → r2, r2 → r0,
r3 → r4, r4 → r5}, and generate a list of instructions that accomplishes the moves
simultaneously. There may be data dependencies between the locations that need
shuffling, the example above shows such a situation where the locations form a
loop (r0 → r1 → r2 → r0). First of all, the moves are broken down into either
paths or loops, then code for appropriete categories are generated. For example,
the above mapping contains a loop (r0 → r1 → r2 → r0) and a path (r3 → r4 →
r5). The number of instructions generated for a loop shuffle is n + l, where n is
the number of variables involved, and l is the number of loops. This additional l
is because we need a temporary location and an extra instruction to store the
entry point value of each loop.
4.2 Compound Model Transformers
The compound model transformers dispatch on the syntax of the intermediate language.
They are basically the branches of an abstract interpreter which analyzes and transforms
the input code. Each branch of it is of the type
(Exp, Model, Ctx) → ([Inst], Value, Model).
The input type signifies that the transformer dispatches on Exp, the type of the syntax
tree node of the intermediate language. It takes a model and a context (Ctx), and
returns a list of instructions, a value, and a new model. This is basically an effect-value
system, where the instruction list ([Inst]) contains the effects and the value contains a
pure value. The effect can be combined with a sequence of other effects, but only the
value can be plugged into a context where a value is expected (for example, an operand
of a binary operation). The Ctx parameter is a “context type” specifying the outer context (e.g., tail context). The model transformers can then look at the context type and
decide whether to generate code for a tail call or a non-tail call.
Because the complexity of the compound transformers, they will not be displayed
here. The interested reader is referred to the actual code for more information. Here we
just briefly discuss the cases one by one.
•
x ← y {end*}. The assignment. First, recursively allocate registers for y and get a
new model model1. Notice that y here can match either a variable, a value or a
binary operation such as a + b. After that, delete end* from model1, use this
model to allocate a register to x, and get model2. The generated instructions are
thus concatenated and returned, together with the rewritten assignment and
model2.
•
If t then c else a. Allocate registers for t, get model1. Then use model1 to allocate for c and a, get model2 and model3, respectively. Then generate the “shuffle
instructions” that unites model2 into model3, resulting in model4. Finally, combine the code from the recursive call, insert shuffle instructions into the “then”
branch. Output the rewritten if-statement and model4.
•
fxyz
◦
, {end*}. The case for a call is more involved.
First, a list of call-live variables are found by deleting end* from the input
model. If we are in tail context, there will be no call-lives.
8
Section 5
◦
Then we generate a new map, map1 by binding the call-lives to their destinations. In short, map1 specifies the moves we need to make in order to set
up the call.
◦
A frame pointer (stack pointer) adjustment is computed from the number
of call-live variables.
◦
The list of parameters are bound according to the calling convention in
map1.
◦
If we are in tail context, the special variable RET is bound to the return
address register in map1. Otherwise we generate a new label lab1, and
have it bound to the return address register in map1.
◦
Shuffling code is generated from map1.
◦
The call is rewritten as a list of shuffling code, an adjustment to the frame
pointer, a jump, and a reverse adjustment to the frame pointer.
•
s1, s2, . The sequence. First, the head of the sequence is recursively allocated by
passing nontail as the Ctx parameter, getting model1. Then using model1, the
rest of the sequence is recursively allocated by passing the input Ctx parameter
as the context.
•
[x + y] ← z. The memory mutation operation. First we use the primitive model
transformer load to allocate for x, y and z, getting model1. Then we rewrite the
statement using model1.
•
x + y. Binary operations are similar to memory mutation, thus omitted here.
5 Online Live Range Splitting
Live range splitting can be found in several extensions to graph coloring and linear scan.
Most of them require a separate pass to split the live ranges, and use the split live
ranges to compute the register allocations. MTS does live range splitting in a seamless
and implicit manner. You don’t see explicit code for it, but it is implicit in the generated instructions. A simple example should clarify this point.
x ← 1, {}
y ← 2, {}
z ← y + 1, {}
w ← x + y, {x}
Figure 1. Example program with two registers.
In this example, we have only two registers r1 and r2. After x and y taking r1 and
r2, we run out of registers when we try to find a register for z. A graph coloring algorithm would report a failure here unless a live range splitting pass first segments the live
ranges of the variables. It is easy to see that the interference graph would contain a
strongly connected component here, making the graph uncolorable.
9
Cache Replacement Policies
It is interesting to see how MTS splits the live ranges in this situation. It just swaps
x out into a stack location, say fv2, then takes its register as the home for z. The generated code would look like
r1
r2
fv2
r1
←
←
←
←
1
2
r1 ; store
r2 + 1
r1 ← fv2 ; load
r1 ← r1 + r2
Figure 2. Generated code containing splitted ranges.
The instruction fv2 ← r1 is generated in such a manner that as if x goes out of range
at that point. After that, r1 starts to represent z, and reverts back to x after we load
fv2 into r1 again. Notice that we load x back into r1 just by coincidence here. It may be
loaded into any other unoccupied register.
If we were to do live range splitting first, we would have to split the live range of x
into three segments, at points delimited by the store and load instructions. After that,
the second segment would be “spilled” by graph coloring or linear scan, i.e., the variable
x would be in the stack within this range.
6 Cache Replacement Policies
At program points where we run out of registers, we must choose a “victim” to be placed
into the stack. The question is which variable to pick. This is an important question,
because it affects the number of register-memory moves. For example, a particularly bad
strategy is “last in, first out” (LIFO): swapping out a variable which just recently came
into its live range. This strategy is bad because a recent variable is likely be used very
soon. Doing so would cause it to be loaded into a register again, possibly causing
another variable to be swapped out.
An arguably good strategy is to pick a variable that will not be used soon. This can
be implemented as follows. When doing the liveness analysis, we record where each variable is referenced. The register allocation pass can then know the NEXT-USE-POS of
each variable at each program point. When we need to pick a victim, we just choose the
one with highest NEXT-USE-POS.
Now we argue that this strategy generates the least register-memory traffic. Suppose
we did not pick x, the variable with the highest NEXT-USE-POS. We picked another
variable y. Then y will be referenced earlier than x, because its NEXT-USE-POS must
be less than x’s. So when y is referenced, it must be loaded into a register. Because we
are likely to be under register pressure, we have to swap another variable (possibly x)
into stack. The question is, why don’t we swap x into stack in the first place? By doing
so, we delay the need for a load at our best.
10
Section 8
7 Related Work
Related work has been mostly graph coloring and linear scan and their extensions, with
a few isolated works.
Chaitin [2] proposed formulating register allocation as graph coloring. As we have
discussed in the introduction, this formulation puts restrictions on the generated code,
thus limiting the possibilities of reducing register-memory traffic.
Linear scan [5] has been proposed as an alternative to graph coloring, but in essence,
it can also be viewed as a greedy algorithm for graph coloring: coloring the graph vertices in the order of the program. Thus it suffers from almost the same constraints.
Agat [1] proposed a type theory for register allocation, but the main focus of this
work is on purely functional languages. It uses a similar method as model transformation semantics (because it is a type theory), but it doesn’t aim at reducing registermemory traffic, thus many optimizations are omitted. For example, it doesn’t try to efficiently reuse stack locations at all.
Pereira and Palsberg [6] proposed register allocation by puzzle solving. Although
their result is comparable with other state-of-the-art algorithms, their method does not
do live range splitting, an important way to open up the door to more optimizations.
None of these works do live-range splitting by default. They all need extensions that
does the splitting in a separate pass. For example, the live range splitting extension to
linear scan is discussed in [7].
8 Implications to Verified Compilers
In the context of verified compiler construction, a register allocation pass is usually not
deductively verified, as is the case for other parts of the compiler. This is largely due to
the complexity involved in the math of the graph coloring algorithm. For exmaple, the
certified C compiler CompCert [4] uses a “validation pass” after each compilation in
order to check the consistency of the graph coloring. This essentially is a dynamic check
in the compiler’s run time (also called “compile time”). The validation must be run after
each compilation of the user program, instead of just running once when the compiler is
constructed.
Actually most parts of a verified compiler can be verified by a logic system, because
they are semantics-based. For example, the CPS transformation and the data representation are rather straightforward to verify by “statically analyzing” the compiler. Static
analysis is easy when the program fits into an abstract interpretation framework, but
rather hard if it is derived from another branch of mathematics, such as graph theory or
group theory.
The MTS method is largely semantics-based—it operates as an abstract interpreter.
Thus it is possible that it will lead to a formally verified register allocation pass, where
it is certified once and for all when the compiler is constructed.
Bibliography
11
9 Future Directions
Currently the register allocation assumes a RISC-like architecture. All operands must be
loaded into registers before they are operated on. A possibly fruitful future work is to
extend this method to architectures that allow and encourage memory operands and
irregular instruction formats.
The current MTS does not do backtracking, thus shuffling code length may not be
optimal. Limited backtracking may be added to the method, leading to further reduction to register-memory traffic.
Also the current implementation compacts the stack before each call. This will
induce quite some memory-memory traffic because the call-live variables may not be
saved into the same stack locations across calls. An optimization would be to pre-assign
stack locations to call-live variables, so that their locations are fixed. Once a variable is
saved, it will not be saved again or moved to another stack location. A backward scan is
necessary to collect the call-live information.
Also the current work lacks experimental results. Comparing by using benchmarks is
the next topic on the agenda.
10 Conclusion
This article has presented a semantics-based method (MTS) for register allocation. The
main ideas are model transformer semantics and static cache replacement. Relationships
with graph coloring and linear scan are made clear by careful reasoning about their
behavior. MTS has been shown to have the advantages of exploring a larger solution
space than naive graph coloring and linear scan, and thus possibly leads to optimizations by the other two methods. Live range splitting, an important optimization which
is found as an extension to graph coloring and linear scan, is included into MTS seamlessly, without increasing the complexity of the implementation. The semantics-based
approach also opens the door to the simplifications of a verified register allocation pass.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Andy Keep and Oleg Kiselyov for their insightful
discussions.
Bibliography
[1] Johan Agat. Types for register allocation. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 92–111.
Springer-Verlag, 1998.
[2] Gregory Chaitin. Register allocation and spilling via graph coloring. SIGPLAN Not., 39:66–74,
April 2004.
[3] Michael R. Garey and David S. Johnson. Computers and Intractability; A Guide to the Theory
of NP-Completeness. W. H. Freeman & Co., New York, NY, USA, 1990.
12
Section
[4] Xavier Leroy. Formal verification of a realistic compiler. Commun. ACM, 52:107–115, July
2009.
[5] Massimiliano Poletto and Vivek Sarkar. Linear scan register allocation. ACM Transactions on
Programming Languages and Systems, 21:895–913, 1999.
[6] Fernando Magno Quintão Pereira and Jens Palsberg. Register allocation by puzzle solving. SIGPLAN Not., 43:216–226, June 2008.
[7] Christian Wimmer and Hanspeter Mössenböck. Optimized interval splitting in a linear scan register allocator. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM/USENIX international conference on Virtual execution environments, VEE ’05, pages 132–141, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM.
| 6cs.PL
|
Statistical Inference for Ergodic Point Processes and Application to
Limit Order Book
Simon Clinet and Nakahiro Yoshida
Graduate School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Tokyo
∗
arXiv:1512.01899v3 [math.ST] 27 Sep 2016
CREST, Japan Science and Technology Agency
September 28, 2016
Abstract
We construct a general procedure for the Quasi Likelihood Analysis applied to a multivariate point
process on the real half line in an ergodic framework. More precisely, we assume that the stochastic intensity
of the underlying model belongs to a family of processes indexed by a finite dimensional parameter. When
a particular family of laws of large numbers applies to those processes, we establish the consistency, the
asymptotic normality and the convergence of moments of both the Quasi Maximum Likelihood estimator
and the Quasi Bayesian estimator. In addition, we illustrate our main results by showing how they can
be applied to various Limit Order Book models existing in the literature. In particular, we address the
fundamental cases of Markovian models and exponential Hawkes process-based models.
Keywords : Multivariate point process, ergodicity, Hawkes process, inferential statistics, Quasi Likelihood
Analysis, Limit Order Book.
1
Introduction
Most financial transactions take place nowadays in electronic markets. In the so-called continuous-time double
auctions system, traders can freely send buying or selling orders at any price level. As the matching process
of those asynchronous orders is rather complex, every submission is centralized in an Electronic Limit Order
Book (also denoted by LOB), waiting to be executed according to its price and time priority. An LOB is thus
a multidimensional queuing system, that gathers the total volume of non-executed orders for every price level.
Essentially, market agents interact with this dynamical system via three elementary rules. They may submit a
buying (resp. selling) limit order that will increase the size of one queue on the bid (resp. ask) side of the LOB.
They also may send a buying (resp. selling) market order that will immediately consume the corresponding
liquidity at the best available price. Finally they can submit cancellation orders to remove one of their latent
limit order in the LOB. Driven by these simple mechanisms, the characteristics of the Order Book, such as
its mid price, its shape, or the number of orders submitted in a given time window are subject to random
fluctuations as time passes.
As the macroscopic price movements of an asset are determined by the evolution of its Order Book through
time, understanding the stochastic structure of this object is a fundamental issue. It is also a way to describe
∗ Graduate School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Tokyo: 3-8-1 Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8914, Japan. e-mail:
[email protected], [email protected]
1
in a high-dimensional context the microstructure phenomena related to the stock price movements. Indeed,
phenomena such as the Epps effect, traditionally represented by an unknown noise process in many studies
that confine themselves to one-dimensional price models, are captured when the whole Limit Order Book is
taken into account. While the availability of high-frequency financial data has made in-depth analysis of LOB
dynamics accessible, it is now possible to use statistical tools in order to highlight either empirical facts about
their shapes and their evolution [26, 9], or to design and select models that are able to reproduce some of those
stylized facts. For the latter, modelling the stochastic behavior of Limit Order Books has been the subject
of an intense research over the last decade, the simplest approaches being zero-intelligence models, in which
interarrival times of orders are exponentially distributed. The seminal work about this basic representation
[34] has been followed by many extensions, see e.g. [1, 11, 13, 12, 27]. Despite their mathematical tractability,
such models are too simple to be entirely satisfactory, essentially because of the absence of any structure of
dependence in the order submission process. Lately more complex dynamics have been proposed, including
Markovian models [16], Hawkes process driven bid-ask prices [5, 40], or even Hawkes processes-based LOB
models [2, 35, 6], the latter being reputed to efficiently capture the time clustering property of orders, and the
cross-dependences in the order flow.
The fact that an LOB is mechanically driven by the orders submitted over time has encouraged many
authors to see Order Books through the stochastic structure of their interarrival times (∆T0 , ∆T1 , ...) between
two successive events. Accordingly, it seems appropriate to describe a Limit Order Book as a high-dimensional
point process, that is a process N whose components Ntα − Ntα′ count the number of orders of same type, and
′
at the same price level, that have been successively submitted in a time interval [t, t ]. In a parametric context,
estimating the true parameter θ∗ of the model based on the observations is therefore a very general and crucial
issue that may take place in (at least) two distinct asymptotics. As, for liquid stocks, a tremendously large
number of events happen during short periods of times, the heavy traffic limit (very large number of events
on a fixed time window) offers a favorable framework for the construction of consistent estimators. In [30], a
sequence of multivariate point processes is thus assumed to be observable on a time interval [T0 , T1 ]. Under
suitable assumptions on the sequence of stochastic intensities itself, it is shown that even in this non-ergodic
context it is possible to conduct the so-called Quasi Likelihood Analysis procedure (QLA). In particular, both
the Quasi Maximum Likelihood estimator (QMLE) and the Quasi Bayesian estimator (QBE) are consistent,
asymptotically mixed normal, and their moments converge.
In this work, instead, we focus on the long run characteristics of the LOB seen as a point process. While the
time parameter T tends to infinity, assuming that the LOB satisfies a suitable ergodicity assumption, we make
use of this property to derive the asymptotic properties of the QMLE and the QBE. This problematic is by no
means new since the consistency and the asymptotic normality of the Maximum Likelihood estimator (MLE) for
ergodic stationary point processes were established a few decades ago in [29] and [33]. [37] has also suggested a
different approach based on parameter estimation for the spectral density of the process. In the non-stationary
regime, the inhomogeneous Poisson process case has been deeply investigated in [22], and conditions for the
convergence of moments of the MLE and the Bayesian estimator (BE) of a general point process have been stated
in [21] (see Theorems 4.5.5 and 4.5.6). Furthermore, Maximum Likelihood estimations have been empirically
conducted for the abovementioned models, but the fact that such procedure is consistent is sometimes unclear.
As a matter of fact, the term ergodicity itself can be subject to various definitions according to the underlying
structure of the process (stationarity, Markovian property, ...). However, all those structures share an essential
property, namely a family of laws of large numbers (LLN). Indeed, denoting by λ(t, θ) the stochastic intensity
of the point process, we have in many cases
1
T
Z
0
T
f (λ(s, θ))ds →P π(f, θ),
(1.1)
those convergences being the crucial assumptions to determine the asymptotic properties of both the QMLE
and the QBE, regardless of the nature of the operator π. We therefore consider (1.1) as a general definition of
ergodicity in the present paper. We sometimes need to consider slightly more general processes than the simple
vector λ(t, θ) in (1.1) for technical considerations, although this is not necessary in many cases. Needless to
2
say that this almost model-free representation covers thus a wide range of examples, and our main result is the
derivation of the full Quasi Likelihood Analysis for point processes in this unified context. Under suitable assumptions that are given in this paper, both the QMLE and the QBE satisfy the following asymptotic properties :
θT →P
√
T (θT − θ∗ ) →d
√
E[f ( T (θT − θ∗ ))] →
θ∗ ,
Γ
− 21
(1.2)
ξ,
E[f (Γ
− 12
(1.3)
ξ)], ξ ∼ N ,
(1.4)
where Γ is the Fisher information, N is the standard normal distribution, and f is any continuous function
of polynomial growth. Here →P and →d respectively stand for the convergence in probability and the convergence in distribution. Let us give a few comments on the latter result. The convergence (1.4) is essentially
a consequence of the local asymptotic normality (LAN) of our statistical model at point θ∗ , along with some
deviation inequality on the Quasi Likelihood random field. It is also well-known that if those properties hold
true uniformly in θ∗ , then our estimators are asymptotically efficient in the sense of the Hájek-Le Cam bound.
In other words, they attain the minimum of an asymptotic minimax bound for the risk associated to any loss
function of polynomial growth. We refer the reader to [14] and [18], Sections II.11-12 and III.1-2 for precise
statements of these results. Finally, let us mention that the convergence of moments is very often needed in order
to identify the bias correction term for the construction of information criteria. A presentation of information
criterion-based model selection can be found in the introduction of [38].
From a practical point of view, such general framework provides solid results on two very popular estimators
that are commonly used in empirical works. Despite the fact that their properties were partially known in
various cases, we believe that this unified view will both consolidate those results by systematically ensuring
(1.2)-(1.4) and help the practitioner to easily validate the theoretic properties of her estimators when she is
confronted with point process regression. Indeed, the central condition for our result is the LLN (1.1), which
can often be naturally derived from the underlying structure of the model she is willing to use. On the other
hand, the question of the choice of the model, that also arises in practice is more complex. Consequently, further considerations, such as model selection, mispecification, or inference for more general processes are beyond
the scope of this paper but are quickly mentioned in the conclusion. We finally insist on the fact that such
general QLA procedure is applicable to any context involving an ergodic point process. Accordingly, the range
of applications does not reduce to finance, but extends to diverse fields such as seismology and optics (see the
introduction of [22]), or neurobiology (see Examples 2 and 3 in [10]) to name a few.
The paper is organized as follows. We introduce a general ergodic multivariate point process model in
Section 2. Section 3 is devoted to show, under a classical approach first, the consistency and the asymptotic
normality of the QMLE under suitable regularity conditions. These results are then generalized to the convergence of moments of both the QMLE and the QBE under stronger assumptions. We give some applications and
examples that are picked from the literature on Limit Order Books and that satisfy those general conditions in
Section 4, and we conclude this paper in Section 5. Finally, we gather some annex proofs and lemmas in Section 6.
3
2
Multivariate point process
We first introduce the general framework for a parametrized multivariate point process. Let B = (Ω, F , F, P),
F = (Ft )t∈R+ be a stochastic basis, and assume that we are given a multidimensional point process Nt =
(Ntα )α∈I , I = {1, ..., d} that is adapted to F. For example, each Ntα can be thought as the number of limit (resp.
cancellation, market) orders at some given price level pα that have been submitted in the time interval [0, t].
The general definition of a Limit Order Book and the multivariate point process associated to it will be given
in Section 4, since no Limit Order Book knowledge is needed to understand this statistical part. The filtration
F = (Ft )tR+ is generated by the collection of observable processes involved in the structure of N . In the most
basic case F is generated solely by N itself and is thus the so-called canonical filtration of the point process, as
is the case for the self-exciting Hawkes process as defined in Section 4.2. On the other hand, Examples 3.3, 3.4
and 3.6 along with the LOB models described in Examples 4.2 and 4.3 include additional observed explanatory
processes.
For the sake of simplicity N is assumed to be defined on R+ , N = (Nt )t∈R+ , N0 = 0, and its components
N α have Rno common jumps. N can also be seen as an integer measure if we write for any Borel subset A,
N (A) = A dNs . In particular Nt = N ([0, t]). Understanding the dynamic of a point process on R+ can be
done, as usual, by studying its underlying stochastic intensity. We recall that if we write Λt the Ft -compensator
of Nt , we call λ the (predictable) Ft -stochastic intensity of N , that is the unique (predictable) process such that
Λt =
Z
t
λ(s)ds
0
if such representation exists. Intuitively speaking, λ(t)dt is, conditionally to Ft , the average (multivariate)
number of jumps dNt , or in an informal way, E [dNt |Ft ] = λ(t)dt.
Since λ determines the law of the process N , the choice of the form of λ is an important question. In a
parametric context, it is common to allow the stochastic intensity itself to depend on a parameter θ as follows :
for some finite dimensional relatively compact open space Θ ⊂ Rn , n ≥ 1, we consider the family of adapted (and
Rt
thus observable) processes Λt (θ) = 0 λ(s, θ)ds. We assume that there exists an unknown true value θ∗ ∈ Θ
such that λ(t, θ∗ ) is the actual Ft -intensity of Nt . The process Ñt = Nt − Λt (θ∗ ) is thus a local martingale.
Let us introduce a few
the paper, if x designates a real number, a vecP terms and notations. All nalong
⊗2
stands for the product of x and its transpose :
tor or a matrix, |x| =
i |x|i . For a vector x ∈ R , x
1
x⊗2 = x.xT ∈ Rn×n . If X is a random variable, kXkp = E [|X|p ] p . If aT and bT are sequences of random
aT
variables, aT = oP (bT ) stands for bT 1{bT 6=0} →P 0. We also write aT = OP (bT ) to say that abTT 1{bT 6=0} is
stochastically bounded. For a process X, FtX = σ{Xs , 0 ≤ s ≤ t} designates the canonical filtration of X.
Finally, for a Borel space (E, B(E)), Cb (E, R) is the set of continuous, bounded functions from the space E to
R, equipped with their underlying topologies.
We will work with the following two fundamental conditions on the family (λ(t, θ))t∈R+ ,θ∈Θ :
[A1 ] The mapping λ : Ω × R+ × Θ → R+ is F ⊗ B(R+ ) ⊗ B(Θ)-measurable. Moreover, almost surely,
(i) for any θ ∈ Θ, s → λ(s, θ) is left continuous.
(ii) for any s ∈ R+ , θ → λ(s, θ) is in C 3 (Θ), and admits a continuous extension to Θ.
[A2 ] The intensity processes and their first derivatives satisfy
P3
(i) for any p > 1, supt∈R+ i=0 supθ∈Θ ∂θi λ(t, θ) p < +∞.
(ii) for any p > 1, for any α ∈ I, supt∈R+ supθ∈Θ λα (t, θ)−1 1{λα (t,θ)6=0}
4
p
< +∞.
(iii) For any θ ∈ Θ, for any α ∈ I, λα (t, θ) = 0 if and only if λα (t, θ∗ ) = 0.
Remark 1. The processes supθ∈Θ ∂θi λ(., θ) are F ⊗ B(R+ )-measurable mappings. Indeed, the continuity in θ
of λ ensures that the sup can be taken over a countable dense subset {θi |i ∈ N} ⊂ Θ. Note also that allowing
intensities to vanish in [A2] is necessary in an LOB framework since in practice cancellation orders can occur
at some level α ∈ I only if the corresponding limit is not empty.
We introduce the Quasi-Log Likelihood process as
lT (θ) =
XZ
α∈I
T
0
log(λα (s, θ))dNsα −
XZ
α∈I
T
λα (s, θ)ds.
Note that although λα (s, θ) may vanish, (2.1) is well defined as the non-negative process
verifies
E
"Z
0
T
#
1{λα (s,θ)=0} dNsα = E
"Z
0
T
(2.1)
0
#
1{λα (s,θ∗ )=0} λα (s, θ∗ )ds = 0.
RT
0
1{λα (s,θ)=0} dNsα
(2.2)
α
Writing ∆Nsα for Nsα − Ns−
, we notice that P-a.s., thanks to (2.2), for any s ∈ R+ , 1{λα (s,θ)=0} ∆Nsα = 0.
The previous equality entails the finiteness of log(λα (s, θ)) whenever a jump occurs, and therefore the integral
in dNsα of the Quasi-Log Likelihood process is well-defined. In most situations, this process is indeed the real
Log Likelihood process up to a constant term, as is the case when Ft = FtN is the canonical filtration of N (see
Theorem 5.45, Chapter III in [19]).
Finally we say that a statistic θ̂T is an asymptotic Quasi-Maximum Likelihood estimator if it asymptotically
maximizes the rescaled Quasi-Log Likelihood process in the following sense :
lT (θ)
lT (θ̂T )
≥ sup
− oP
T
θ∈Θ T
1
√
T
.
(2.3)
We also call QMLE or exact QMLE the estimator that maximizes the rescaled Quasi-Log Likelihood. In
section 3 we give a general ergodicity assumption, and prove the consistency and the asymptotic normality
of any asymptotic QMLE. We finally derive the convergence of moments of both the exact QMLE and the
QBE under a stronger version of the ergodicity assumption. A summary of the asymptotic properties of the
estimators and the related assumptions can be found in Table 1.
3
3.1
Quasi Likelihood Analysis
The ergodicity assumption
We make an extensive use of the law of large numbers in our proofs. In particular the Fisher information matrix
and the asymptotic Quasi-Log Likelihood can be expressed as such time average limits. In the sequel, we refer
to the following general definition when we consider ergodic processes :
Definition 3.1. Let (E, B(E)) be a Borel space, and X : Ω × R+ → E a stochastic process. We say that X is
ergodic if there exists a mapping π : Cb (E, R) → R such that for any ψ ∈ Cb (E, R)
1
T
Z
0
T
ψ(Xs )ds →P π(ψ).
5
The main assumption that is at the core of our results is the following ergodicity condition on the processes
(λα (., θ∗ ), λα (., θ), ∂θ λα (., θ)) taking values in E = R+ × R+ × Rn :
[A3 ] For any α ∈ I, θ ∈ Θ, the triplet (λα (., θ∗ ), λα (., θ), ∂θ λα (., θ)) is ergodic in the sense of Definition 3.1. In
other words, there exists a mapping πα : Cb (E, R) × Θ → R such that for any (ψ, θ) ∈ Cb (E, R) × Θ, the
following convergence holds :
1
T
Z
0
T
ψ(λα (s, θ∗ ), λα (s, θ), ∂θ λα (s, θ))ds →P πα (ψ, θ).
Every component of the process (λ(., θ∗ ), λ(., θ), ∂θ λ(., θ)) is therefore assumed to be ergodic. Before we turn
to the statement of our main results, let us raise a few examples to illustrate this property in various situations.
Example 3.2. Assume that N is a univariate inhomogeneous Poisson process, that is a point process whose
intensity is Ra deterministic function. If t → λ(t, θ) is periodic of period τ ∈ R+ − {0}, then [A3] holds with
τ
π(f, θ) = τ1 0 f (λ(s, θ∗ ), λ(s, θ), ∂θ λ(s, θ))ds. [A3] also holds if for i ∈ {0, 1}, ∂θi λ(t, θ) → ∂θi λ∞ (θ) as t → ∞
with π(f, θ) = f (λ∞ (θ∗ ), λ∞ (θ), ∂θ λ∞ (θ)).
Example 3.3. Assume that N counts the jumps of an observable Pure Jump-Type Markovian process Y on
a discrete state space (see [20], chapter 12). It is a straightforward consequence of the definition of Y and N
that the FtY -stochastic intensity has the representation λ(t, θ) = g(Yt− , θ) for some function g. Let us assume
further that Y is ergodic (see [23] for a presentation of ergodicity
R for Markovian processes). If Y takes values
in Y and has invariant probability π Y , [A3] holds with π(f, θ) = Y f (g(y, θ∗ ), g(y, θ), ∂θ g(y, θ))π Y (dy).
Example 3.4. Let us assume that N is a univariate Cox process directed by some observable left-continuous
ergodic Markovian process Y (a rigourous definition of a Cox process can be found in [20], chapter 12). Ac(N,Y )
cordingly, assume that the Ft
-intensity has the form λ(t, θ) = g(Yt , θ) for some continuous function g. The
same conclusion as in Example 3.3 holds.
Example 3.5. Consider a univariate stationary point process N , that is a point process such that for any
r ∈ N and any bounded Borel subsets A1 , ..., Ar , the distribution of (N (A1 + t), ..., N (Ar + t)) does not depend
on t. The FtN -intensity of N is thus automatically a stationary process. Let us assume that N is stationary
ergodic, meaning that its invariant σ-field is trivial. It is straightforward to see that [A3] holds with π(f, θ) =
E [f (λ(0, θ∗ ), λ(0, θ), ∂θ λ(0, θ))], by virtue of Birkhoff ’s ergodic Theorem.
Example 3.6. Take the same representation as in Example 3.4, but instead of the Markovian property, assume
that the process (Yt )t has continuous paths and enjoys the regenerative property (see [4] chapter VI). Call τ1 , τ2 , ...
the (random) regenerative Rtimes of Y and assume that µ = E[τ1 ] < ∞. Then the ergodicity condition [A3] is
τ
satisfied with π(f, θ) = µ1 E 0 1 f (g(Ys , θ∗ ), g(Ys , θ), ∂θ g(Ys , θ))ds.
We will present examples that are directly related to LOB modelling in Section 4. Before we turn to the
classical approach, let us state a few useful results about the mapping π and the class of functions that satisfy
[A3]. Such extension is necessary because variables of interest such as the Fisher information are of the form
π(f, θ) for unbounded functions f that have singularities when one of their argument vanishes. Using [A2], it is
indeed possible to extend the range of functions for which [A3] holds, and show that each πα (ψ, θ) can be seen
as the integral of ψ with respect to an actual probability measure παθ on E.
Definition 3.7. Recall that E = R+ ×R+ ×Rd . We write C↑ (E, R) the set of functions ψ : (u, v, w) → ψ(u, v, w)
from E to R that satisfy :
• ψ is continuous on (R+ − {0}) × (R+ − {0}) × Rd .
• ψ is of polynomial growth in (u, v, w,
1{u>0} 1{v>0}
, v ).
u
• For any (u, v, w) ∈ E, ψ(0, v, w) = ψ(u, 0, w) = 0.
Proposition 3.8. For a measure µ, let L1 (µ) be the space of functions that are integrable with respect to µ.
Then for any θ ∈ Θ and for any α ∈ I, the following properties hold.
6
(i) The law of large numbers stated in [A3] still holds for any ψ ∈ C↑ (E, R). In particular, the mapping πα (., θ)
can be extended to C↑ (E, R). Moreover, for any ψ ∈ C↑ (E, R) the convergence is uniform in θ.
R
(ii) There exists a probability measure παθ on (E, B(E)) such that for any ψ ∈ C↑ (E, R), πα (ψ, θ) = E ψ(x)παθ (dx).
In particular, C↑ (E, R) ⊂ L1 (παθ ).
We are now ready to investigate the asymptotic properties of our estimators.
3.2
A classical approach for the QMLE
From now on we adopt a martingale approach to derive the consistency and the asymptotic normality of any
asymptotic QMLE θ̂T . The main results are stated in Theorem 3.9 and Theorem 3.11. Consider
YT (θ) =
1
(lT (θ) − lT (θ∗ ))
T
and the asymptotic rescaled Quasi-Log Likelihood
n v
o
XZ
Y(θ) =
1{u>0,v>0} log
u − (v − u) παθ (du, dv, dw).
u
(u,v,w)∈E
(3.1)
α∈I
As we shall see in this section, Y(θ) is the limit of YT (θ) uniformly in θ ∈ Θ. The non-degeneracy of Y is as
usual a crucial point to derive the consistency of our estimator. One possible formulation is the following :
[A4 ] For any θ ∈ Θ − {θ∗ }, Y(θ) 6= 0.
Theorem 3.9. Under [A1]-[A4], any asymptotic QMLE θ̂T is consistent.
θ̂T →P θ∗ .
We first deal with the uniform convergence of YT to Y.
Lemma 3.10. Under [A1]-[A3],
sup |YT (θ) − Y(θ)| →P 0.
θ∈Θ
Proof. Define as previously the following local martingale :
Z t
λα (s, θ∗ )ds.
Ñtα = Ntα −
0
We rewrite YT (θ) as
YT (θ)
=
−
Z
λα (s, θ)
1X T
1 α ∗
dÑsα
log α
∗ ) {λ (s,θ )6=0}
T
λ
(s,
θ
α∈I 0
Z T
X
1
λα (s, θ) α
∗
α
α
∗
λ (s, θ ) 1{λα (s,θ∗ )6=0} ds,
λ (s, θ) − λ (s, θ ) − log α
T
λ (s, θ∗ )
0
α∈I
and for α ∈ I we put
MTα (θ) =
and
Z
0
T
log
λα (s, θ)
1{λα (s,θ∗ )6=0} dÑsα
λα (s, θ∗ )
7
VTα (θ) = −
1
T
Z
T
0
λα (s, θ) − λα (s, θ∗ ) − log
λα (s, θ) α
∗
λ
(s,
θ
)
1{λα (s,θ∗ )6=0} ds.
λα (s, θ∗ )
Let us first show that the martingale term MTα (θ) tends to zero uniformly in θ. Thanks to [A2], MTα (θ) is a
well-defined Lp integrable martingale. We apply Sobolev’s inequality (see e.g. [20], Theorem 4.2, Part I, case
A, with j = 0, m = 1, and any p > n). We thus take some integer p > n and some constant K(Θ, p) such that
M α (θ)
E sup T
T
θ∈Θ
p
≤
K(Θ, p)
Tp
Z
Θ
p
dθE |MTα (θ)|
+
Z
Θ
p
dθE |∂θ MTα (θ)|
.
Now, applying successively Davis-Burkholder-Gundy’s inequality, Jensen’s inequality and assumption [A2]
it is straighforward to see that for some constant C > 0
E[(MTα (θ))p ]
! p2
2
λα (s, θ)
α
∗
CE
log α
λ (s, θ )1{λα (s,θ∗ )6=0} ds
λ (s, θ∗ )
0
p
Z T
p
p
λα (s, θ)
log α
CT 2 −1 E
(λα (s, θ∗ )) 2 1{λα (s,θ∗ )6=0} ds
∗
λ (s, θ )
p 0
O T2 ,
Z
≤
≤
=
and
E[(∂θ MTα (θ))p ] ≤
≤
=
T
! p2
2
∂θ λα (s, θ)
λα (s, θ∗ )1{λα (s,θ∗ )6=0} ds
CE
λα (s, θ)
0
p
Z T
p
p
∂θ λα (s, θ)
−1
2
E
CT
(λα (s, θ∗ )) 2 1{λα (s,θ∗ )6=0} ds
α (s, θ)
λ
p 0
O T2 ,
Z
T
p
RT
Mα
where the permutation of the symbol ∂θ and 0 is permitted by Lemma 6.1. Hence E supθ∈Θ TT
→ 0.
P
α
Finally, thanks to Proposition 3.8, VT (θ) = α∈I VT (θ) converges in probability to Y(θ) uniformly in θ. Thus
sup |YT (θ) − Y(θ)| →P 0.
θ∈Θ
Remark 2. The Sobolev’s inequality depends on regularity properties of the domain Θ, usually expressed as
geometric conditions. Such conditions can be found in [3]. We will assume the following sufficient condition that
is used in [30] as well : inf θ∈Θ Leb(B(θ, ǫ) ∩ Θ) ≥ a0 (ǫn ∧ 1) for any ǫ > 0, where a0 is some positive constant,
B(θ, ǫ) is the open ball centered on θ with diameter ǫ, and Leb is the Lebesgue measure.
Finally the consistency easily follows :
Proof of Theorem 3.9. from the expression
o
n v
XZ
u − (v − u) παθ (du, dv, dw),
Y(θ) =
1{u>0,v>0} log
u
(u,v,w)∈E
α∈I
we immediately deduce that Y ≤ 0 and Y(θ∗ ) = 0. By [A4], θ∗ is thus a global maximum of Y, and by the
previous lemma this ensures the consistency of any asymptotic QMLE.
8
We now turn to the asymptotic normality of θ̂T . Using again [A2] and a variant of Lemma 6.1, we define
for any θ ∈ Θ,
∂θ lT (θ)
T
XZ
=
α∈I
0
λα (s, θ)−1 ∂θ λα (s, θ)1{λα (s,θ∗ )6=0} dNsα −
XZ
α∈I
T
∂θ λα (s, θ)ds,
0
which, evaluated at point θ∗ , has the form
∂θ lT (θ∗ ) =
XZ
T
0
α∈I
λα (s, θ∗ )−1 ∂θ λα (s, θ∗ )1{λα (s,θ∗ )6=0} dÑsα ,
and
∂θ2 lT (θ)
T
XZ
=
0
α∈I
T
XZ
−
0
α∈I
XZ
+
T
0
α∈I
∂θ λα (s, θ)−1 ∂θ λα (s, θ) 1{λα (s,θ∗ )6=0} dÑtα
(∂θ λα )⊗2 (s, θ)λα (s, θ)−2 λα (s, θ∗ )1{λα (s,θ∗ )6=0} ds
∂θ2 λα (s, θ)λα (s, θ)−1 (λα (s, θ) − λα (s, θ∗ ))1{λα (s,θ∗ )6=0} ds.
Finally consider the Fisher information matrix
XZ
1{u>0} θ∗
πα (du, dv, dw) ∈ Rn×n .
Γ=
w⊗2
u
(u,v,w)∈E
(3.2)
α∈I
If Γ is not singular, the asymptotic normality holds :
Theorem 3.11. Let θ̂T be an asymptotic QMLE and assume that Γ is positive definite. We have
√
1
T (θ̂T − θ∗ ) →d Γ− 2 ξ,
where ξ follows a standard normal distribution.
We have divided the proof of this result into the next two lemmas.
Lemma 3.12. Under [A1]-[A3], if VT is a ball centered on θ∗ shrinking to {θ∗ }, then
sup |T −1 ∂θ2 lT (θ) + Γ| →P 0.
θ∈VT
Proof. We first deal with
We can easily see that the processes
the martingale part as for the consistency.
∂θ λα (s, θ)−1 ∂θ λα (s, θ) 1{λα (s,θ∗ )6=0} and ∂θ2 λα (s, θ)−1 ∂θ λα (s, θ) 1{λα (s,θ∗ )6=0} are dominated by polynoms in
∂θi λα (t, θ) and λα (t, θ)−1 1{λα (s,θ∗ )6=0} for i ∈ {0, 1, 2, 3}, and thus by an immediate application of Sobolev’s
inequality and [A2], we get for any p > n
1
E sup
θ∈Θ T
Z
p
T
α
∂θ λ (s, θ)
0
thus
X
1
sup
T θ∈Θ
α∈I
For θ ∈ VT , we have
−1
Z
T
0
α
∂θ λ (s, θ) 1{λα (s,θ∗ )6=0} dÑtα
p
= O T−2 ,
∂θ λα (s, θ)−1 ∂θ λα (s, θ) 1{λα (s,θ∗ )6=0} dÑtα →P 0.
9
1
T
Z
T
∂θ2 λα (s, θ)λα (s, θ)−1 (λα (s, θ) − λα (s, θ∗ ))1{λα (s,θ∗ )6=0} ds
0
Z
|θ − θ∗ | T
sup ∂θ2 λα (s, θ)λα (s, θ)−1 sup |∂θ λα (s, θ)|1{λα (s,θ∗ )6=0} ds
T
θ∈Θ
0 θ∈Θ
= OP (|θ − θ∗ |)
= OP (diam[VT ]),
≤
therefore
Z
1 X T 2 α
sup
∂θ λ (s, θ)λα (s, θ)−1 (λα (s, θ) − λα (s, θ∗ ))1{λα (s,θ∗ )6=0} ds →P 0.
θ∈VT T
0
α∈I
For the middle term, consider the process
UTα (θ)
1
=
T
Z
T
0
(∂θ λα )⊗2 (s, θ)λα (s, θ)−2 λα (s, θ∗ )1{λα (s,θ∗ )6=0} ds,
which, evaluated at point θ∗ equals
UTα (θ∗ )
1
=
T
|θ − θ∗ |
T
Z
Z
T
0
(∂θ λα )⊗2 (s, θ∗ )λα (s, θ∗ )−1 1{λα (s,θ∗ )6=0} ds.
For θ ∈ VT ,
|UTα (θ)
−
UTα (θ∗ )|
≤
≤
=
T
(∂θ λα )⊗2 (s, θ)
λα (s, θ∗ )ds
∂θ
λα (s, θ)2
0
Z
|∂θ λα (s, θ)||∂θ2 λα (s, θ)| |∂θ λα (s, θ)|2 |∂θ2 λα (s, θ)|
|θ − θ∗ | T
λα (s, θ∗ )ds
+
2 sup
α (s, θ)|2
α (s, θ)|3
T
|λ
|λ
θ∈Θ
0
OP (diam[VT ]).
Finally, apply Proposition 3.8 to UTα (θ∗ ) and write Γ ∈ Rn×n the limit of
Lemma 3.13. We have :
1
1
∗
√ ∂θ luT (θ )
→d Γ 2 (Wu )u∈[0,1] ,
T
u∈[0,1]
P
α∈I
UTα (θ∗ ) to conclude.
where W is a standard Brownian motion (where the convergence happens in the Skorokhod space D([0, 1])).
Proof. We consider the process
SuT =
XZ
α∈I
uT
0
1
√ λα (s, θ∗ )−1 ∂θ λα (s, θ∗ )1{λα (s,θ∗ )6=0} dÑsα ,
T
and show a functional central limit theorem when T → ∞. Indeed, as ∆N α1 ∆N α2 = 0 almost surely for
α1 6= α2 , we have
hS T , S T iu = u
XZ
α∈I
0
uT
1 α
λ (s, θ∗ )−1 ∂θ λα (s, θ∗ )2 1{λα (s,θ∗ )6=0} ds,
uT
and by ergodicity we deduce that
10
hS T , S T iu →P uΓ.
We now check Lindenberg’s condition. For any a > 0,
E
X
(∆SsT )2 1{|∆SsT |>a}
s≤u
1X
|∆SsT |3
a
s≤u
Z
3
1 X uT λα (s, θ∗ )−1 ∂θ λα (s, θ∗ )
√
dNsα
E
a
T
0
α∈I
Z uT
X
1
1
3
E
λα (s, θ∗ )−1 ∂θ λα (s, θ∗ ) λα (s, θ∗ )ds
3
a
2
T
0
α∈I
X 1 Z uT
α
∗ −1
α
∗ 3 α
∗
E sup λ (s, θ ) ∂θ λ (s, θ ) λ (s, θ ) ds
3
T2 0
θ∈Θ
α∈I
1
→ 0.
O √
T
≤ E
=
=
≤
=
The conclusion then holds applying 3.24, chapter VIII, in [19].
We finally establish the asymptotic normality from the previous lemmas :
Proof of Theorem 3.11. Let θ̄T be the value that maximizes θ → lT (θ). Thanks to [A2], we put ζT1 ∈ [θ̄T , θ̂T ]
and ζT2 ∈ [θ∗ , θ̂T ] such that
∂θ lT (θ̂T ) = ∂θ2 lT (ζT1 )(θ̂T − θ̄T ) = oP
on one hand, and
√
T
∂θ lT (θ̂T ) = ∂θ lT (θ∗ ) + ∂θ2 lT (ζT2 )(θ̂T − θ∗ )
√
on the other hand. This yields, after scaling by T ,
−
∂θ lT (θ∗ )
∂ 2 lT (ζT2 ) √
√
T (θ̂T − θ∗ ).
+ oP (1) = θ
T
T
We then multiply by −Γ−1 on both sides and use Lemma 3.12 and Lemma 3.13, and the asymptotic normality
follows.
3.3
The general QLA
We slightly strengthen assumptions about ergodicity and derivability of the intensity process in order to apply
the general Quasi Likelihood Analysis. In particular, this yields the convergence of moments of the QMLE as
well as the convergence of moments for the QBE. From now on, we will be only interested in the exact QMLE,
that is the estimator that maximizes the Quasi Log Likelihood θ → lT (θ).
[B1 ] The mapping λ : Ω × R+ × Θ → R+ is F ⊗ B(R+ ) ⊗ B(Θ)-measurable. Moreover, almost surely,
(i) for any θ ∈ Θ, s → λ(s, θ) is left continuous.
(ii) for any s ∈ R+ , θ → λ(s, θ) is in C 4 (Θ), and admits a continuous extension to Θ.
[B2 ] The intensity processes and their first derivatives satisfy
11
(i) for any p > 1, supt∈R+
P4
i=0
supθ∈Θ ∂θi λ(t, θ)
p
< +∞.
(ii) for any p > 1, for any α ∈ I, supt∈R+ supθ∈Θ λα (t, θ)−1 1{λα (t,θ)6=0}
p
< +∞.
(iii) For any θ ∈ Θ, for any α ∈ I, λα (t, θ) = 0 if and only if λα (t, θ∗ ) = 0.
The ergodicity assumption needs to be strengthened as well. The key point in the following assumption is
to postulate the existence of a rate of convergence for the LLN. Let D↑ (E, R) be the set of functions ψ that are
of class C 1 on (R+ − {0}) × (R+ − {0}) × Rn and such that ψ, |∇ψ| ∈ C↑ (E, R).
[B3 ] For any α ∈ I, there exists a mapping πα : D↑ (E, R) × Θ → R and there exists 0 < γ <
any (ψ, θ) ∈ D↑ (E, R) × Θ and for every p > 1 the following convergence holds :
sup T γ
θ∈Θ
1
T
T
Z
0
ψ(λα (s, θ∗ ), λα (s, θ), ∂θ λα (s, θ))ds − πα (ψ, θ)
p
1
2
such that for
→ 0.
[B4 ] Define χ0 as:
χ0 =
inf
θ∈Θ\{θ ∗ }
−
Y(θ)
.
|θ − θ∗ |2
We assume that
χ0 > 0.
For a given prior density p on the space Θ, we define the Quasi-Bayesian Estimator as follows:
θ̃T =
Z
Θ
exp(lT (θ))p(θ)dθ
−1 Z
θexp(lT (θ))p(θ)dθ.
Θ
We are going to apply results from [39] about Quasi Likelihood Analysis based on polynomial type large
deviations. This approach follows techniques that have been developed in [18] to prove the asymptotic properties
of the MLE and the BE in a general context. In particular, the convergence of moments of those estimators
is obtained as a consequence of the convergence in distribution of the Likelihood random field along with a
polynomial type large deviation inequality similar to the one stated in Theorem 3.14. In our case, we adopt the
notations of [39] and represent the Quasi Likelihood process as follows. For any u ∈ UT = {u ∈ Rn |θ + T −1/2 u ∈
Θ}, we write θu = θ + T −1/2 u and define the Quasi Likelihood random field
ZT (u) = exp{lT (θu ) − lT (θ∗ )}.
The next theorem gives a large deviation inequality on ZT , which in turn is widely used to establish the
convergence of moments of the estimators.
Theorem 3.14. Under [B1]-[B4], the two following results hold:
Polynomial type large deviation inequality for every L > 0, there exists CL such that :
#
"
CL
P
sup
ZT (u) ≥ e−r ≤ L .
r
u∈UT ,|u|>r
Convergence of moments If θ̂T is the QMLE and θ̃T the QBE, we have :
i
h √
1
E f ( T (θ̂T − θ∗ )) → E[f (Γ− 2 ξ)],
i
h √
1
E f ( T (θ̃T − θ∗ )) → E[f (Γ− 2 ξ)],
for any continuous f of polynomial growth, and such that ξ follows a standard normal distribution.
12
To prove this result, and in order to highlight the LAN property (at point θ∗ ) of the model, we rewrite
ZT (u) as
1
ZT (u) = exp ∆T [u] − ΓT [u, u] + rT [u] ,
2
(3.3)
with
∆T [u] =
u
√ ∂θ lT (θ∗ )
T
and
ΓT [u, u] =
−∂θ2 lT (θ∗ )
u⊗2
.
T
Finally rT [u] is defined as the following residual in the Taylor formula :
1
lT (θu ) = lT (θ∗ ) + ∆T [u] − ΓT [u, u] + rT [u].
2
The following technical lemma is proved in the appendix :
Lemma 3.15. Under [B1]-[B3], for every p > 1,
sup k∆T kp < ∞,
(3.4)
T ∈R+
T γ sup |YT (θ) − Y(θ)|
sup
θ∈Θ
T ∈R+
p
< ∞,
sup kT γ |ΓT − Γ|kp < ∞,
(3.5)
(3.6)
T ∈R+
sup
T ∈R+
T −1 sup |∂θ3 lT (θ)|
θ∈Θ
p
< ∞.
(3.7)
Let us deal with the proof of Theorem 3.14.
Proof of Theorem 3.14. We first show the polynomial type large deviation inequality. We apply Theorem 3 in
′′
2γ
α
, 1−α
}[, Conditions (A1 ),
[39]. Setting β1 = γ, β2 = 12 − γ, ρ = 2, ρ2 ∈]0, 2γ[, α ∈]0, ρ22 [, and ρ1 ∈]0, min{1, 1−α
′
(A4 ), (A6) in [39] are satisfied thanks to Lemma 3.15, as well as (B1), (B2) thanks to the non-degeneracy
assumption [B4] above.
We now make use of Theorem 4 in [39] to show the convergence of moments for the QMLE. We first extend
the definition of ZT (u) to any u ∈ Rn by taking ZT (u) continuously decreasing to zero outside UT . We need to
show that the finite dimensional distribution of ZT are convergent, and then that logZT is tight in T , seen as a
family of processes in u ∈ K for any compact set K of Rn . Because we have the majoration
1
3
3
− 32
E [|rT [u]|] ≤ T E sup |∂θ lT (θ)||u| = O √
→ 0,
T
θ∈Θ
the finite dimensional convergence, and thus the LAN property, is a direct consequence of the classical approach
given the expressions of ∆T and ΓT .
13
Take then an arbitrary compact set K, and put wT (δ) = sup|u2 −u1 |≤δ |logZT (u2 ) − logZT (u1 )| where the
supremum is taken over the set K. We need to prove that for every ǫ > 0,
lim sup P[wT (δ) ≥ ǫ] = 0.
δ→0 T
Using Markov’s inequality we first have for amy p > n
ǫ−p E|wT (δ)|p
p
ǫ−p E sup |lT (θu2 ) − lT (θu1 )| .
P[wT (δ) ≥ ǫ] ≤
≤
|u2 −u1 |≤δ
We have
lT (θu2 ) − lT (θu1 ) =
T
XZ
0
α∈I
λα (s, θu2 )
log α
dÑ α −
λ (s, θu1 ) s
Z
T
0
λα (s, θu2 ) λα (s, θu2 ) − λα (s, θu1 )
λα (s, θ∗ )ds,
log α
−
λ (s, θu1 )
λα (s, θ∗ )
that we bound from above in two steps. Defining MTα (θu ) =
and p > n,
sup
E
|u2 −u1 |≤δ
Z
T
log
0
λα (s, θu2 )
dÑ α
λα (s, θu1 ) s
RT
logλα (s, θu )dÑsα , we first write for some α ∈ I
0
p
= E
sup
|u2 −u1 |≤δ
|MTα (θu2 ) − MTα (θu1 )|
p
≤ δ T − 2 E sup |∂θ MTα (θu )|
p
p
p
u∈K
≤ K1 δ p
where we have applied Sobolev’s inequality and Davis-Burkholder-Gundy’s inequality at the last step. One can
check that the same holds for the integral with respect to Lebesgue measure:
E
sup
|u2 −u1 |≤δ
Z
0
T
λα (s, θu2 ) λα (s, θu2 ) − λα (s, θu1 )
log α
λα (s, θ∗ )ds
−
λ (s, θu1 )
λα (s, θ∗ )
p
≤ K2 δ p .
This shows that
sup P[wT (δ) ≥ ǫ] ≤
T ∈R+
Kδ p
→ 0, δ → 0.
ǫp
Finally, thanks to the polynomial type large deviation inequality and Lemma 2 in [39], for some δ > 0 we
have
!−1
Z
< ∞.
sup E
ZT (u)du
T ∈R+
u:|u|≤δ
The convergence of moments of the QBE is then a direct consequence of Theorem 8 in [39].
3.4
Mixing criteria for ergodicity
We conclude this theoretical part by giving two mixing criteria that respectively imply the ergodicity conditions
[A3] and [B3]. As we shall see in the sequel, it is sometimes easier to check such condition, as is the case for
the Hawkes processes. In order to match with our definition 3.1, we say that a process (Xt )t∈R+ taking values
in some state space E is C-mixing, for some set of functions C from E to R, if for any φ, ψ ∈ C, the following
convergence holds
ρu = sup Cov[φ(Xs ), ψ(Xs+u )] → 0, |u| → +∞
s∈R+
14
[M1 ] The following two properties hold :
Mixing For any α ∈ I, (λα (t, θ∗ ), λα (t, θ), ∂θ λα (t, θ))t∈R+ is Cb (E, R)-mixing.
Stability For any α ∈ I, there exists λ̄α such that for any θ ∈ Θ,
(λα (t, θ∗ ), λα (t, θ), ∂θ λα (t, θ)) →d (λ̄α (θ∗ ), λ̄α (θ), ∂θ λ̄α (θ)).
Note that in the stationary case with C = {1A |A ∈ B(R)}, the above condition is nothing more than a mixing
assumption in the classical sense (see e.g. [8]) which is a well-known sufficient condition for the ergodicity of
the invariant measure. In the same spirit of [B3], we also reformulate [M1] with a minimal rate of convergence
in the mixing and the stability equations.
[M2 ] There exists 0 < γ <
1
2
such that :
Mixing For any α ∈ I, (λα (t, θ∗ ), λα (t, θ), ∂θ λα (t, θ))t∈R+ is D↑ (E, R)-mixing uniformly in θ ∈ Θ. Moreover the rate ρ verifies :
2γ
ρu = o(u−ǫ ) for some ǫ >
.
1 − 2γ
Stability There exists λ̄α such that for any ψ ∈ D↑ (E, R),
sup tγ E[ψ(λα (t, θ∗ ), λα (t, θ), ∂θ λα (t, θ))] − E[ψ(λ̄α (θ∗ ), λ̄α (θ), ∂θ λ̄α (θ))] → 0.
θ∈Θ
The next lemma links the above mixing criteria to the ergodicity assumptions [A3] and [B3] and specifies
the nature of the operator π in those cases.
Lemma 3.16. If [M1], [A1] and [A2] (resp. [M2], [B1] and [B2]) are satisfied, then so is the ergodicity
condition [A3] (resp. [B3]), and moreover the mapping πα writes:
πα (ψ, θ) = E[ψ(λ̄α (θ∗ ), λ̄α (θ), ∂θ λ̄α (θ))].
Estimator
Definition
Asymptotic QMLE
√
lT (θT ) ≥ supθ∈Θ lT (θ) − oP ( T )
Exact QMLE
lT (θT ) = supθ∈Θ lT (θ)
QBE
θT =
R
θexp(lT (θ))p(θ)dθ
RΘ
exp(lT (θ))p(θ)dθ
Θ
Regularity Assumptions
[A1], [A2] and [A4]
[B1], [B2] and [B4]
Ergodicity Assumption
[A3] or [M1]
√
1
E[f ( T (θT − θ∗ ))] → E[f (Γ− 2 ξ)]
[B3] or [M2]
√
1
E[f ( T (θT − θ∗ ))] → E[f (Γ− 2 ξ)]
Property
∀f ∈ Cb (Rn , R)
∀f ∈ Cp (Rn , R)
Table 1: Summary of the asymptotic properties of the three estimators presented in Section 3. In each definition,
θT represents the estimator itself. Cb (Rn , R) (resp. Cp (Rn , R)) is the set of functions from Rn to R which are
continuous and bounded (resp. continuous and of polynomial growth) .
4
Applications
As mentioned in the introduction, a fruitful approach to Limit Order Book process modelling consists in focusing
on the point process that counts different events of interest occurring over time. More precisely, recall that in
a simplified representation of the continuous-time double auction system any agent interacts with the market
through three types of orders :
15
• Limit order : Submit a buy (resp. sell) order at a lower (resp. higher) price than the best ask (resp. bid)
price. The order is immediately inserted in the corresponding queue (regarding the price level p at which
the order has been sent).
• Market order : Consume the liquidity at the best ask (resp. bid) price for a buy (resp. sell) order.
• Cancellation order : Remove one limit order that is waiting in the LOB.
In practice every order is characterized by a volume v that represents the amount of shares one is willing
to buy or sell, and a price level p that is constrained to belong to a price grid G ⊂ {k.∆p|k ∈ N}. ∆p is the
smallest distance between two price limits and is called the ticksize. Let us then call a (finite dimensional) Limit
Order Book a process that is constituted of m ∈ N queues stored in X(t) ∈ Zm . At time t ∈ R+ , Xα
t contains
the total volume of limit orders that have been submitted through time at a given level and that have not been
executed yet. As sellers should always submit limit orders at higher prices than buyers, A Limit Order Book
can always be split into two distinct parts : The queues associated to selling limit orders, at higher prices, or
the ask side, and the queues at lower prices, that contain buying limit orders, or the bid side. It is also common
to call spread the empty zone between the best limits, that is the limits laying between the highest bid and the
lowest ask.
As the number of queues should be potentially infinite, such modelling is not straightforward, and many
representations exist in the literature. Most of those representations can be actually classified into two main
families : The absolute LOB’s associate to each price level p ∈ G a label α ∈ N and for the whole life of the
process X, Xα will contain the volume of latent limit orders that have been submitted at this price level. It
is common to count positively the limit orders on the ask side, and negatively those on the bid side. Such
representations only involve a finite price range {k1 ∆p , ..., k2 ∆p }, and are thus satisfactory provided that most
events occur in this window. An illustration of this model can be found in [13]. On the other hand, the relative
LOB’s are generally centered around a reference price, that is a price that either plays a role for the shape of
the LOB itself, or has a good economical interpretation. As an example, the former is often taken as the best
ask price or the best bid price, see [1]. The latter can be an underlying unobserved process that is assumed
to be the true price, that is the value toward which the market price would tend if, say, the information was
perfectly shared. In any case, the relative representation associates a label α to each price level relatively to
its position compared to the reference price. The general framework introduced in [17] is based on this representation. Therefore, as such price is typically stochastic, any price movement shifts the labelling to the left
or to the right as time passes. Both representations have their pros and cons, that we will not discuss here.
In the following we are not concerned with this technical choice since the statistical procedure remains the same.
Since any order is characterized by a (random) volume v, the jumps of X need not be of size 1. To conduct
the QLA through a point process perspective, it is quite common to simply decompose X through the arrival of
orders of different types, and ignore in a first approximation the size of those orders. We thus define
• An m-dimensional point process L that counts the limit orders, compensated by ΛL .
• An m-dimensional point process C that counts the cancellation orders, compensated by ΛC .
• A 2-dimensional point process M that counts the market orders, compensated by ΛM .
Note that it is possible to take into account the size of the orders by splitting again every point process
according to the volume of the orders. A general approach would therefore consist in constructing a point
process that counts the orders of type Y ∈ {C, L, M }, at price level α ∈ {1, ..., m}, and of volume v ∈ {1, ..., v̄}
for any triplet (Y, α, v). Such decomposition is done in a Markovian framework in [17]. In practice, v̄ is large and
it is thus preferable for dimension considerations to construct K zones for the volume V1 , ..., VK and collect the
orders whose volume belongs to a given zone. Other criteria are sometimes taken into account when considering
the modelling of an Order Book. In [36], the author shows that aggressiveness of orders is also a very important
feature when it comes to describing the stationary distribution of best limits sizes. Basically, an order is said
to be aggressive if it is a market order that consumes all the liquidity at one of the best limits, or if it is a limit
16
order placed inside the spread.
It is also worth noting that the knowledge of X is sufficient to reconstruct the process L since it counts
the jumps that increase the absolute value of the size of one queue. On the other hand, market orders and
cancellation orders at best limits cannot be distinguished from the knowledge of X alone. Practically speaking,
when working with real data, it is crucial to assume that the events that diminish the size of one queue are
labelled in one way or the other so one can distinguish market and cancellation orders. This is possible if for
example one has access to the record of trades on the market. Other practical issues, such as hidden liquidity,
or cross trades can also make the data analysis difficult.
Let us assume from now on that the LOB X and the point process N that gathers the events of interest are
constructible, and fully observable. We focus on the parametrization of the intensities along with the ergodicity
of the models existing in the literature.
4.1
Markovian models
Some models assume the existence of an observable underlying process (Yt )t adapted to the filtration F =
(Ft )t∈R+ such that the parametrized intensity process writes
λ(t, θ)
= h(Yt , θ).
Example 4.1. Consider first the very simple following model, inspired of [12]. The LOB (X(t))t is represented
in a level-I perspective (best ask and best bid limits only). It is assumed that every time one queue gets empty,
it is randomly regenerated. This accounts for the volume that is stored in the new best limit, that is the first
non-empty limit after the one that just depleted, and that is inaccessible in this two dimensional representation.
The authors postulate that all the intensities are constant, and thus (Lt , Mt , Ct )t is a 6-dimensional Poisson
process :
λ(t)
= λ0 .
The multivariate Poisson process being obviously ergodic, this toy model trivially enjoys all the properties
derived in Theorem 3.14.
Example 4.2. In [1], Abergel and Jedidi define a multidimensional LOB whose cancellation intensities are
linear functions of the size of the queues of the LOB itself, and other intensities remain constant. In other
words, any intensity at a given level α ∈ I is of the form
λL,α (t)
= λL,α
0 ,
λC,α (t)
= λC,α
0 |Xα (t−)|,
and the market orders intensities on the best limits write
λM,Bid (t) = λM,Bid
,
0
λM,Ask (t) = λM,Ask
.
0
Such model presupposes that market agents are independent, and that every order that has been posted is
cancelled after exponential random times. In their paper, Abergel and Jedidi prove that such feedback mechanism
> 0 for all α ∈ I are sufficient to show that (Xt )t is a V -geometric Markovian
along with the condition λC,α
0
process (see [25, 24] for a deep insight of this notion).
17
The above mentioned models and their variants are reputed for their mathematical tractability. For example,
analytical expressions of quantities of interest that quantify the shape of the Limit Order Book are derived in
[27]. Needless to say that being able to write closed formulas is generally admitted to be a significant criterion
for practical considerations. On the other hand, it is also equally admitted that such Poisson process-based
models perform poorly when it comes to closely reproducing most stylized facts observed on the markets, as it
is shown in [16]. In particular, the lack of dependency between the successive orders, and between the queues
is one of the major drawbacks of those basic models. The following example is a quite general Markovian
framework that allows such dependencies.
Example 4.3. In [16] and [17], the model described in Example 4.2 is generalized. X is defined as a general
Pure Jump-Type Markovian process, as in Example 3.3. Recall that the intensity vector is therefore a pure
function of the LOB state :
λ(t, θ)
=
h(X(t−), θ).
Whatever the form of h, the authors establish the V -geometric ergodicity of the Markovian process X in the
case where cancellation intensities become predominant whenever the size of one limit gets too large.
4.2
Multivariate Hawkes process
In this section we are interested in the special case of multivariate Hawkes process with exponential kernel as
Hawkes process-based models have been applied to various topics in finance, notably to Limit Order Books.
As we shall see in the remaining part of this paper, it turns out that the full QLA is applicable to such class
of models. Both computation of the MLE and simulation methods for the exponential Hawkes process can be
found in [31].
Those processes were introduced by Hawkes in 1971, see [15] and were extensively used to model earthquakes and their aftershocks. Lately they have been used in finance to model various phenomena such as price
variation, market impact, and Limit Order Book mechanisms. [7] provides a very complete summary of the
different applications of Hawkes processes in finance. Let us mention in particular the use of Hawkes processes
in [35] to model the interaction between liquidity providers and liquidity takers. In this work a level-I LOB is
described, in which the point process gathering limit and market orders is modelled as a multivariate Hawkes
process. The use of those self-exciting processes highlights the fact that orders seem to trigger each other. It
quantifies to what extent self excitations and mutual excitations have an impact on the interarrival time of
order submissions, and their relative importance. For example, it is shown in [35] that market orders (and thus
liquidity takers) strongly influence limit orders (liquidity providers), but limit orders, in turn, have a negligible
impact on market orders. Recently, a more theoretical work by Abergel and Jedidi [2] establishes V -geometric
ergodicity and scaling limits in a Hawkes-based Markovian framework applied to a general LOB. It is basically
a generalization of Example 4.2, where the Poisson assumption on limit orders and market orders is relaxed.
More specifically, keeping the same notations as above, instead of a mere Poisson process, the vector (L, M ) is
supposed to form a multivariate Hawkes process while the dynamic of C remains unchanged. Motivated by those
examples whose detailed descriptions can be found in the abovementioned papers, we turn to the definition of
a general Hawkes process.
Let Nt = (Ntα )α∈I , I = {1, ..., d}, N0 = 0, be a multidimensional point process and write FN = (FtN )t∈R+ ,
where we recall that FtN = σ{Ns |0 ≤ s ≤ t} is the canonical filtration of N . We say that N is a linear Hawkes
process or Hawkes’ self-exciting process starting from 0 if there exist h : R+ → Rd×d
and ν ∈ (R∗+ )d such that
+
N
the Ft -intensity λ(t) of N writes
α
λ (t) = να +
XZ
β∈I
0
t−
hαβ (t − s)dNsβ , α ∈ I.
(4.1)
The baseline intensities να ’s represent the rate of spontaneous occurences of events, while the kernels hαβ ’s
model self-interaction in the system. Indeed, if a shock occurs at time t0 on the covariate N β , an aftershock
18
will happen on the covariate N α around time t1 with high probability if hαβ (t1 − t0 ) is large. When hαβ = 0,
the covariate N β has no influence on the chain of events related to N α . For example, in the model from [2], and
in accordance with the empirical results found in [35], the mutual excitation structure of the process (L, M ) is
assumed to be of the form “MM-LL-LM”, i.e market orders excite both market orders and limit orders, whereas
limit orders only trigger themselves.
Let us define the matrix Φ = [φαβ ]αβ where
φαβ =
Z
+∞
hαβ (s)ds,
0
and write ρ(Φ) its spectral radius. We also define the elementary excitations as
Z t−
hαβ (t − s)dNsβ ,
ǫαβ (t) =
0
that we gather in the matrix E(t) = ǫαβ(t) αβ . Finally, given A = [aαβ ]αβ and C = [cαβ ]αβ ∈ Rd×d
+ , we say
that N is an exponential Hawkes process if the kernel functions hαβ are of the form
hαβ (s) = cαβ e−aαβ s .
h
i
c
Note that the matrix Φ has the representation Φ = aαβ
in that case. We now recall a few results about
αβ
αβ
the Hawkes process and its exponential form.
Proposition 4.4. Let N be a multivariate Hawkes process, and assume that ρ(Φ) < 1. Then :
′
′
′
′
′
(i) There exists a probability space (Ω , F , P ) and two point processes N and N̄ defined on Ω and on the
′
whole real line such that N|R+ is distributed as N , and N̄ is a stationary point process whose FtN̄ -intensity
λ̄ verifies :
X Z t−
α
λ̄ (t) = να +
hαβ (t − s)dN̄sβ .
β∈I
−∞
(ii) Let S be the shift operator, meaning that for any t ∈ R+ , St N = (Ns+t )s∈R+ . Then N is stable in the
following sense :
St N →D N̄|R+ ,
where D designates the weak convergence associated to the vague topology on integer valued measures.
(iii) If N is an exponential Hawkes process, there exist q > 0 and A > 0 such that, for any α ∈ I, for any
t ∈ R+ ,
λα (t) − λ̄α (t)
1
≤ Ae−qt .
See [10] for deeper explanations about this mode of convergence. The first two points of Proposition 4.4 are
immediate consequences of Theorem 1 and Lemma 4 in [10] along with the assumption on ρ(Φ). Note that they
do not require N to be exponential. In practice, the first point allows us to assume the existence of a stationary
version of N on the same probability space, and the second assertion states that N tends in distribution to
N̄ for a certain topology. Finally, the last point states that in the exponential case, the L1 deviation of the
transient intensity from its stationary version is, not surprisingly, exponentially decreasing.
As is well known, The process E is Markovian if the kernel are of exponential form. It also enjoys a very
strong ergodicity property, that is introduced in the next proposition. Following the definitions in [24], we say
19
that a continuous time Markovian Process X is V -geometrically ergodic if, denoting by P its transition kernel,
there exists some norm-like function V on the state space of X, B < +∞, and r < 1 such that :
P t (x, .) − P X̄
≤
V
B(V (x) + 1)rt ,
(4.2)
for any initial state x, and any t ∈ R+ , where P X̄ is the stationary law of X̄t . Here, k.kV designates the
V -variation norm (See [25]), that is, for any measure µ on a measured space (S, S),
Z
kµkV = sup
ψ(s)µ(ds) .
(4.3)
ψ|ψ≤V
S
Proposition 4.5. Assume that ρ(Φ) < 1. Then :
(i) The elementary excitation process E is a Markovian process taking values in Rd×d
+ .
(ii) E is V -geometrically ergodic, and moreover V : Rd×d
→ R+ can be chosen as V (ǫ) = ehM,ǫi for some
+
P
d×d
M = [mαβ ]αβ ∈ R+ and with hM, ǫi = α,β∈I mαβ ǫαβ .
By virtue of the Markovian property and the expression (4.3), (4.2) thus writes for any 0 ≤ s ≤ t,
sup
ψ|ψ≤V
E ψ(Et )|FsE − E ψ(Ē) ≤ B(V (Es ) + 1)rt−s
(4.4)
where Ē follows the stationary distribution of the process E.
We now consider an exponential Hawkes process as a model parametrized by the triplet (ν, C, A) ∈ Rd+ ×
d×d
d
× Rd×d
× Rd×d
+ . More precisely we consider a relatively compact open parameter state Θ ⊂ R+ × R+
+
such that for any triplet θ = (ν, C, A) ∈ Θ, for any α, β ∈ I,
Rd×d
+
0 <
0 <
0 <
ν ≤ να ≤ ν̄ < +∞,
c ≤ cαβ ≤ c̄ < +∞,
a ≤ aαβ ≤ ā < +∞.
In particular, we assume for the sake of identifiability that the cαβ are positive. Let us assume, in the spirit
of the first part, that there exists θ∗ = (ν ∗ , C ∗ , A∗ ) ∈ Θ, such that θ∗ is the real parameter that drives the
dynamic of N . We are now ready to state the main result of this section.
Theorem 4.6. The exponential Hawkes model verifies the conditions [B1], [B2], [M2], and [B4]. In particular,
by virtue of Theorem 3.14 and Lemma 3.16, if θ̂T = (ν̂T , ĈT , ÂT ) is the QMLE and θ̃T = (ν̃T , C̃T , ÃT ) the QBE
of the model, we have
h √
i
1
E f ( T (θ̂T − θ∗ )) → E[f (Γ− 2 ξ)],
i
h √
1
E f ( T (θ̃T − θ∗ )) → E[f (Γ− 2 ξ)],
where Γ is the Fisher information, f is any continuous function of polynomial growth, and ξ follows a standard
normal distribution.
[B1] is immediate given the explicit expression of the intensity function. Unfortunately, the ergodicity
condition [B3] is not a direct consequence of the V -geometric ergodicity of the process E. This is due to the fact
that the vector (λ(t, θ∗ ), λ(t, θ), ∂θ λ(t, θ)) cannot be expressed as a pure function of the marginal E(t). On the
other hand, since the stochastic structure of the process (λ(., θ∗ ), λ(., θ), ∂θ λ(., θ)) is globally driven by E, the
exponential rates in (4.4) and in Proposition 4.4 (iii) are strong enough to ensure the mixing assumption [M2].
The detailed proofs can be found in the appendix.
20
5
Conclusion
We have introduced in this paper a general ergodic framework for point process regression models, in which we
were able to derive general asymptotic properties of both the Quasi Maximum Likelihood estimator and the
Quasi Bayesian estimator. Because such formulation of ergodicity covers a wide range of models, we have shown
that the Quasi Likelihood Analysis approach is robust in the sense that it applies to various contexts, provided
that they encompass a family of laws of large numbers on the parametric stochastic intensity.
Since, in practice, for Limit Order Books, parameters (and other variables of interest) are often estimated
via such time average limits, we have decided to focus on various point process models that are directly involved
in the modelling of the dynamics of LOB’s. In particular, we have seen that Markovian models, self-exciting
exponential Hawkes processes, and their mixtures that can be found in the literature are examples of applications
of the QLA.
It is also important to know the limits of such procedure. Parametric estimations are undoubtebly powerfull
when it comes to calibrating on real data a model that looks well suited to, say, the reproduction of stylized facts
observed in practice. Nevertheless, in many cases the choice of a parametric model is quite arbitrary although
it should be investigated with the help of mathematical tools. Information criteria (AIC, BIC), sparsity (e.g.
LASSO type estimations), and hypothesis testing, are examples of model selection methods that can quantify
in some sense to what extent models perform well (this last statement being deliberately vague here), even in
mispecified contexts. Another approach consists in checking the validity of a model by testing the constancy of
the parameters over time. In the same spirit as in [32], but in a different asymptotic though, empirical tests
could be conducted to investigate the stability of parameters. Should they fail, the choice of an ergodic model
itself would have to be reconsidered. Although such considerations are beyond the scope of the present paper,
they should be investigated in the future.
Let us conclude this work by pointing out that in the litterature there is virtually no LOB model that allows
random volumes of orders, except slight generalizations, either to the simple I.I.D case (see e.g. [27]), or in a
theoretic Markovian framework [17]. The lack of such model extensions is probably due to the fact that the very
rich and complex structure of Order Books is still poorly understood. The QLA could be generalized to more
intricate models for Limit Order Books in order to address the most general structure between random time
events Ti and random order sizes Vi . Accordingly, statistical inferences for marked point processes should thus
be the subject of a further work as well. Along with the abovementioned model selection machinery, applications
to real data analysis would certainly shed light on these little-known mechanisms.
Acknowledgement
This work was in part supported by CREST Japan Science and Technology Agency, Japan Society for the
Promotion of Science : Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research No. 24340015 (Scientific Research), No. 26540011
(Challenging Exploratory Research); NS Solutions Corporation; and by a Cooperative Research Program of the
Institute of Statistical Mathematics.
6
6.1
Appendix
Proofs of Section 3
Proof of Proposition 3.8. Let us start with the identification of the mapping πα (., θ) on Cb (E, R). For the sake
of simplicity we write Xsα (θ) = (λα (s, θ∗ ), λα (s, θ), ∂θ λα (s, θ)), and we consider the sequence of probability
measures on E defined for any Borel subset A ⊂ E :
θ
πT,α
(A) =
1
T
Z
0
T
P[Xsα (θ) ∈ A]ds.
21
For any ψ ∈ Cb (E, R), an immediate application of the dominated convergence theorem and [A3] shows that
θ
θ
ψ(x)π
T,α (dx) → πα (ψ, θ). On the other hand, it is straightforward to see that the family (πT,α )T ∈R+ is tight
E
θ
α
since the family (Xt (θ))t∈R+ is tight itself. Thus along a subsequence (πT,α )T ∈R+ converges weakly to some
R
παθ , and for any ψ ∈ Cb (E, R), πα (ψ, θ) = E ψ(x)παθ (dx) which determines uniquely παθ .
R
Let us now show (i). Let ψ ∈ C↑ (E, R). Because we can separate ψ as usual ψ = ψ+ − ψ− , where ψ+ and
ψ− are respectively the positive and negative parts of ψ, it is not restrictive to assume that ψ is non-negative.
Consider first the case where ψ is continuous on the whole set E. Put then δ > 0, and consider for T ∈ R+
VTα (θ) =
1
T
Z
1
T
Z
T
T
0
ψ(Xsα (θ))ds
and
VTδ,α (θ) =
0
(ψ(Xsα (θ)) ∧ δ) ds,
so
E
VTα (θ)
−
VTδ,α (θ)
"Z
T
≤
1
E
T
"Z
T
≤
1
E
T
≤
≤
0
1
E
Tδ
Q
,
δ
0
Z
0
T
(ψ(Xsα (θ))
− δ) 1{ψ(Xsα (θ))≥δ} ds
ψ(Xsα (θ))1{ψ(Xsα (θ))≥δ} ds
#
#
ψ(Xsα (θ))2 ds
′
where Q = supt∈R+ E supθ∈Θ ψ(Xtα (θ))2 . Now taking T and T positive real numbers, we get :
E|VTα (θ) − VTα′ (θ)|
α,δ
α
≤ E|VTα (θ) − VTα,δ (θ)| + E|VTα,δ (θ) − VTα,δ
′ (θ)| + E|V ′ (θ) − V ′ (θ)|
T
T
≤ 2
Q
+ E|VTα,δ (θ) − VTα,δ
′ (θ)|.
δ
Note that the second term can be controlled since the ergodicity assumption [A3] and the boundedness of
moments of VTα,δ (θ) also imply the convergence in Lp of the LLN for any p ≥ 1. For any ǫ > 0, taking large
′
δ and sufficiently large T and T we can thus conclude that E|VTα (θ) − VTα′ (θ)| ≤ ǫ, showing that VTα (θ) is a
Cauchy sequence in T , and thus converges to a finite value πα (ψ, θ). In particular, thanks to the monotone
convergenceR theorem applied to the family ψ ∧ δ and the measure παθ we have also shown that the identity
πα (ψ, θ) = E ψ(x)παθ (dx) holds. This shows that πα (., θ) can be extended to C↑ (E, R).
In the case where ψ has singularities at points of the form (0, v, w) and (u, 0, w), first construct a sequence
of function ψη ∈ Cb (E, R) such that ψη ↑ ψ when η → 0 and such that for any (u, v, w) ∈ E, ψη (u, v, w) = 0
whenever u ≤ η or v ≤ η, and ψη (u, v, w) = ψη (u, v, w) whenever u ≥ 2η and v ≥ 2η . Such construction is
possible because ψ is lower semi-continuous. It is then straightforward to show that VTα (θ) is again a Cauchy
sequence in L1 as previously.
We now turn to the uniform convergence in θ. Once again, assume first for the sake of simplicity that ψ is
continuous on E. As Θ is compact, it is sufficient to show that the family (θ → VTα (θ))T ∈R+ is equicontinuous
for, say, the L1 norm. Since supt∈R+ E[supθ∈Θ |Xtα (θ)|] < ∞, the family (Xtα (θ))t∈R+ ,θ∈Θ is tight. Consider
22
thus ǫ > 0 and a compact K ∈ E such that P[Xtα (θ) ∈
/ K] < ǫ for all t and θ. Let ψ̃ be a C 1 function with
compact support such that kψ − ψ̃k∞,K < ǫ and ψ̃ ≤ 2ψ outside K, where k.k∞,K is the infinite norm over K.
In particular ψ̃ is k-Lipschitzian for some k > 0. Then
′
′
E|ψ(Xtα (θ)) − ψ(Xtα (θ ))| ≤
′
E|(ψ − ψ̃)(Xtα (θ))| + E|(ψ − ψ̃)(Xtα (θ ))| + E|ψ̃(Xtα (θ)) − ψ̃(Xtα (θ ))|,
but
E|(ψ − ψ̃)(Xtα (θ))|
≤
≤
≤
ǫ + E|(ψ − ψ̃)(Xtα (θ))1{Xtα (θ)∈K}
|
/
12
2
1
ǫ + E (ψ − ψ̃)(Xtα (θ))
P[Xtα (θ) ∈
/ K] 2
1
ǫ + Mǫ2 ,
where M = 3 supt∈R+ k supθ∈Θ ψ(Xtα (θ))k2 . On the other hand,
′
′
E|ψ̃(Xtα (θ)) − ψ̃(Xtα (θ ))| ≤
kE|Xtα (θ) − Xtα (θ )|
′
k|θ − θ | sup E sup |∂θ Xtα (θ)| .
≤
t∈R+
θ∈Θ
′
Thus we deduce that by taking θ sufficiently close to θ ,
′
1
E|VTα (θ) − VTα (θ )| ≤ 3ǫ + M ǫ 2 ,
the bound being independent of T . Such equicontinuity along with the pointwise convergence ensures the
uniform
convergence.
The case where ψ has singularities is treated similarly using the tightness of the family
1{λα (t,θ)6=0}
α
.
Xt (θ), λα (t,θ)
t∈R+ ,θ∈Θ
RT
The following lemma is a verification of the permutation rule of the symbols ∂θ and 0 .
RT
Lemma 6.1. The process 0 log(λα (s, θ))dÑsα is well defined and admits a derivative for any θ ∈ Θ and we
have :
Z
Z
T
∂θ
0
log(λα (s, θ))dÑsα =
T
0
∂θ log(λα (s, θ))dÑsα .
RT
Proof of Lemma 6.1. For the 0 ...dNs part the result is immediate since for almost any ω the integral is
RT
simply a finite sum of terms that are differentiable in θ. For the 0 ...ds part, we first need to show that
RT
log(λα (s, θ))λα (s, θ∗ )ds is well defined a.s., but we have :
0
E
Z
0
using the majoration |log(x)| ≤
Z
0
1
x
T
|log(λα (s, θ))λα (s, θ∗ )| ds < +∞,
+ |x − 1| and [A2]. With a similar argument we can easily show that
T
|∂θ log(λα (s, θ))λα (s, θ∗ )| ds ≤
Z
0
T
sup ∂θ log(λα (s, θ)) λα (s, θ∗ )ds < +∞ P-a.s..
θ∈Θ
Now, for a given ω such that these random variables are finite, we can conclude by applying the dominated
α
α
(s,θ0 )[ω]
when θ → θ0 , with respect to the measure
convergence theorem to the function s → λ (s,θ)[ω]−λ
θ−θ0
α
∗
λ (s, θ )[ω]ds.
23
The following lemma is useful to prove the Lp boundedness of stochastic integrals with respect to the
processes N α or Ñ α .
Lemma 6.2. let ft be a predictable process and consider the martingale Ñt = Nt − Λt (θ∗ ). Then for any p ≥ 1,
α ∈ I, we have the following majoration for some constant Cp :
"Z
#
2p
2p−1
Z T
Z T
T
p
.
E
fs dÑsα ≤ Cp E
fs2 λα (s, θ∗ )ds + Cp E
fs2 λα (s, θ∗ )ds
0
0
0
whenever the expectations are well defined.
Proof of Lemma 6.2. For p = 1 it is sufficient to notice that we have :
"Z
#
2
Z T
T
α
2
α
∗
E
fs dÑs = E
fs λ (s, θ )ds
0
0
For p > 1, notice that by the Burkholder-Davis-Gundy inequality, one can write :
E
Z
2p
T
fs dÑsα
0
≤
Dp E
fs2 dNsα
0
2p−1 Dp E
≤
2p−1
T
Z
Z
2p−1
T
fs2 dÑsα
0
+ 2p−1 Dp E
And by induction, one gets for some constant Qp :
2p
Z T
Z
p
X
E
fs dÑsα ≤ Qp
E
0
T
0
q=1
Z
T
0
2p−1
fs2 λα (s, θ∗ )ds
2p−q
q
ft2 λα (t, θ∗ )dt
.
Now we show that for any q ∈ {1, ..., p},
T
Z
0
If
RT
0
q
ft2 λα (t, θ∗ )dt
!2p−q
≤ max
Z
T
0
!2p−1 Z
2 α
∗
ft λ (t, θ )dt
,
T
0
ft2 λα (t, θ∗ )dt = 0, we trivially get 0 ≤ 0. On the other hand, assuming
gt =
RT
0
Then µ(dt) =
Z
0
gt2 λα (t, θ∗ )dt
T
q
RT
ft2 λα (t, θ∗ )dt
12 .
RT
0
ft2 λα (t, θ∗ )dt > 0, put
!2p−q
=
Z
T
0
q
gt2
−2
µ(dt)
!2p−q
≤
Z
T
0
p
Z
0
T
q
gt2 λα (t, θ∗ )dt
!2p−q
( Z
≤ max 1,
0
And from the expression of g we finally get the overall result.
24
T
p
gt2 λα (t, θ∗ )dt
−2−q
! 2p−1
p−1
2
p
gt2 λα (t, θ∗ )dt
gt2 λα (t, θ∗ )dt ≥ 1 or not, we can conclude
0
.
is a probability measure on [0, T ]. We thus have, by Jensen’s inequality :
gt2 λα (t, θ∗ )dt
Depending on whether
ft
p
ft2 λα (t, θ∗ )dt
)
.
−1
.
Proof of Lemma 3.15. Without loss of generality we can assume that p is of the form p = 2q > n. For (3.4),
it is sufficient to apply Lemma 6.2 to fs = λα (s, θ∗ )−1 ∂θ λα (s, θ∗ )1{λα (s,θ∗ )6=0} , along with [B2]. Following the
same reasoning as for the classical approach, to get (3.5) it is sufficient to show that :
MTα (θ)
T
θ∈Θ
T γ sup
p
→ 0,
and
T γ sup |VT (θ) − Y(θ)|
θ∈Θ
p
→ 0.
For the first part, once again it is sufficient to apply Sobolev’s inequality and then Lemma 6.2 to get the
convergence for any p > n. For the second part, we wish to use Sobolev’s inequality once again, but we need
first to show that Y is of class C 1 on Θ. This is ensured by the fact that supθ∈Θ |∂θ VT (θ) − U(θ)| →P 0 for
some U thanks to [B3]. Thus Y is C 1 and ∂θ Y = U. Now, using Sobolev’s inequality, there exists some constant
A(Θ, p) such that :
T
γp
E sup |VT (θ) − Y(θ)|
θ∈Θ
p
≤ A(Θ, p)T
γp
Z
Θ
p
E [|VT (θ) − Y(θ)| ] dθ +
Z
Θ
p
E [|∂θ VT (θ) − ∂θ Y(θ)| ] dθ .
for any p > n. Because of the ergodicity assumption we have :
T γp sup E [|VT (θ) − Y(θ)|p ] + T γp sup E [|∂θ VT (θ) − ∂θ Y(θ)|p ] → 0,
θ∈Θ
θ∈Θ
which finally shows (3.5). (3.6) is a simple application of [B3], and finally (3.7) is a straightforward consequence
of Sobolev’s inequality and Burkholder-Davis-Gundy inequality.
Proof of Lemma 3.16. We first show the implication [M1] =⇒ [A3]. For T ∈ R+ , (ψ, θ) ∈ Cb (E, R) × Θ, we
write
Xtα (θ) = (λα (t, θ∗ ), λα (t, θ), ∂θ λα (t, θ)),
and
Z
1 T
ψ(Xtα (θ))dt.
=
T 0
Define πα as above and then, evaluating the mean square error, we get
VTα (θ)
2
E[(VTα (θ) − π(ψ, θ))2 ] = Var[VTα (θ)] + (E[VTα (θ) − πα (ψ, θ)])
Z
ZZ
1
1 T
α
α
≤
Cov[ψ(Xt (θ)), ψ(Xs (θ))]dsdt +
(E[ψ(Xtα (θ)) − πα (ψ, θ)])2 dt.
T2
T 0
[0,T ]2
Now, using the mixing property for the first term of the right hand side leads to
1
T2
ZZ
[0,T ]2
Cov[ψ(Xtα (θ)), ψ(Xsα (θ))]dsdt
≤
≤
ZZ
1
ρ|t−s| dsdt
T2
[0,T ]2
ZZ
ZZ
supu∈R+ ρu
1
√ ρ
1
1{|t−s|≤√T } dsdt.
dsdt
+
{|t−s|≥ T } |t−s|
T2
T2
[0,T ]2
[0,T ]2
The first term tends to 0 thanks to the mixing property, and the second term is of order O √1T . The
covariance term thus tends to 0 as T → +∞. The convergence of the bias term to 0 is immediate given the
convergence in distribution of the argument of ψ.
25
It remains to show [M2] =⇒ [B3]. It is sufficient to prove the L2 convergence since the convergence in Lp
for any p ≥ 1 will be a straightforward consequence of the boundedness of moments of the intensity. Write the
rescaled bias-variance decomposition
E[T 2γ (VTα (θ) − π(ψ, θ))2 ] =
≤
≤
2
T 2γ Var[VTα (θ)] + T 2γ (E[VTα (θ) − πα (ψ, θ)])
ZZ
Z
T 2γ−2
Cov[ψ(Xtα (θ), ψ(Xsα (θ)]dsdt + T 2γ−1
[0,T ]2
T
0
2
(E[ψ(Xtα (θ) − πα (ψ, θ)]) dt
A1 (T, θ) + A2 (T, θ).
Thanks to [M2], we have uniformly in θ ∈ Θ that E[ψ(Xtα (θ) − πα (ψ, θ)] = o(t−γ ), and thus the fact that
supθ∈Θ A2 (T, θ) → 0 is clear. For A1 (T, θ), take some 0 < δ < 1 to be defined later and write
A1 (T, θ)
≤ T
≤ T
2γ−2
ZZ
[0,T ]2
2γ−2
ZZ
[0,T ]2
ρ|t−s| dsdt
1{|t−s|≥T δ } ρ|t−s| dsdt + T
2γ−2
ZZ
sup ρu
u∈R+
[0,T ]2
1{|t−s|≤T δ } dsdt.
A short computation leads to the two following dominations (uniformly in θ ∈ Θ) :
ZZ
T 2γ−2
1{|t−s|≥T δ } ρ|t−s| dsdt = o T 2γ−ǫδ ,
[0,T ]2
ZZ
T 2γ−2 sup ρu
1{|t−s|≤T δ } dsdt = O T 2γ+δ−1 ,
u∈R+
[0,T ]2
and consequently both terms can be controlled if there exists δ such that 2γ − ǫδ ≤ 0 and 2γ + δ − 1 < 0, that
is, if 2γ
ǫ < 1 − 2γ. But this is exactly the above-stated condition on ǫ.
6.2
Proofs of Section 4
Proof of Proposition 4.4. Only the third point remains to be proved. We first notice that, for α ∈ I,
α
α
E|λ (t) − λ̄ (t)|
= E
XZ
t−
0
β∈I
XZ
≤ E
β∈I
0
hαβ (t −
t−
s)dNsβ
−
XZ
β∈I
t−
hαβ (t − s)dN̄sβ
−∞
hαβ (t − s)d N β − N̄ β
s
XZ
+E
0
−∞
β∈I
XZ t
XZ
β
β
≤ E
hαβ (t − s) λ (s) − λ̄ (s) ds + E
β∈I
0
β∈I
where N β − N̄ β is the counting measure such that ∆ N β − N̄ β
that the expression of its compensator is λβ (s) − λ̄β (s) . Let
ftα
s
λα (t) − λ̄α (t)
=
rtα
=
β∈I
0
−∞
1
hαβ (t − s)λ̄β (s)ds .
26
hαβ (t − s)λ̄β (s)ds
0
−∞
hαβ (t − s)λ̄β (s)ds ,
= ∆Nsβ − ∆N̄sβ . In [10], the authors show
and
XZ
E
Finally we define the convolution product between two functions as
Z t
φ ∗ ψ(t) =
φ(t − s)ψ(s)ds
0
and the convolution product between two multidimensional applications U : R+ → Rm,n and V : R+ → Rn,q as
U ∗ V : R+ → Rm,q such that
n
X
(U ∗ V )i,j (t) =
Ui,k ∗ Vk,j (t).
k=1
The above equation can thus be rewritten in the following vector form :
≤ rt + h ∗ f (t),
ft
and by an immediate induction one gets for any n ∈ N that
ft
n
X
≤
k=0
h∗k ∗ r(t) + h∗(n+1) ∗ f (t).
Now, for a multidimensional application U : R+ → Rm,n , write the norm
kU k1,Leb
m X
n Z
X
=
i=1 j=1
0
+∞
|Ui,j (t)|dt.
Since all f α ’s are bounded, say, by some Kf ∈ R+ , it is immediate to see that
|h∗n ∗ f (t)|
≤ Kf kh∗n k1,Leb
≤ Kf |Φn | → 0
as ρ(Φ) < 1. Thus we can define the process
R
+∞
X
=
k=0
h∗k ∗ r
and notice that, first, ft ≤ Rt , and that R is a solution to the Markov renewal equation
R = r + h ∗ R.
This type of equations is deeply studied in [4], chapter VII. Let us define Φq as
Φq
=
Z
+∞
eqt h(t)dt.
0
It is shown in Theorem 4.6 of [4], chapter VII, that if Φ0 = Φ is irreducible, and if there exists a real q such
that ρ(Φq ) = 1, then for every α ∈ I
ftα ≤ Rα (t) = O e−qt .
h
i
c
Φ is obviously irreducible since all its coefficients are positive. Now, as for q sufficiently small Φq = aαβαβ−q ,
the application q → ρ(Φq ) is continuous, ρ(Φ0 ) < 1 and ρ(Φq ) → +∞ as q → +∞ and thus Theorem 4.6 from
[4] applies.
27
Proof of Proposition 4.5. The Markovian property of the elementary excitations is a well-known result, see [28].
The V -geometric ergodicity has also been proved for a linear V , see [2]. The case of an exponential V follows a
very similar procedure. As in [2], we need to apply Theorem 6.1 from [24].
Define L the infinitesimal generator of E. If for some V , c > 0, and f < ∞, the following drift criterion holds
−cV (ǫ) + f , ǫ ∈ Rd×d
+ ,
LV (ǫ) ≤
and if every compact set is petite (see [25]), then Theorem 6.1 of [24] applies and E is V -geometrically ergodic.
We first show the drift condition, and postpone the second property to Lemma 6.3 below. Let us take some
M ∈ Rd×d
to be fixed later. It is not hard to see that the infinitesimal generator of E has the following
+
representation
X
Lf (ǫ) =
α∈I
λα (f (ǫ + C̃α ) − f (ǫ)) −
X
aαβ ∂ǫαβ f (ǫ)ǫαβ ,
α,β∈I
P
with the obvious notation λβ = νβ + γ∈I ǫβγ , and where C̃α is the matrix whose elements are all zeros except
for the α-th column wich is the α-th column of C. Applied to the V of the proposition, we get
LV (ǫ)
V (ǫ)
=
X
λβ (e
P
α∈I
mαβ cαβ
β∈I
− 1) −
X
aαβ mαβ ǫαβ .
α,β∈I
Consider now some continuous function ξ such that ξ(x) = o(x) on a vicinity of 0 and such that the following
Taylor expansion holds :
X
P
e α∈I mαβ cαβ − 1 ≤
mαβ cαβ + ξ(|M |).
α∈I
We thus get
LV (ǫ)
V (ǫ)
≤
X
νβ
β∈I
X
α∈I
(mαβ cαβ + ξ(|M |)) +
X
ǫβγ
X
α∈I
β,γ∈I
(mαβ cαβ + ξ(|M |)) −
X
aαβ mαβ ǫαβ .
α,β∈I
Consider now κ ∈ (R+ )d an eigenvector of ΦT , the transposed matrix of Φ, associated to ρ(Φ), and put for
any α, β ∈ I
mαβ
=
κα
.
aαβ
Such eigenvector exists thanks to Perron-Frobenius theorem. It is easy to see that we have then
LV (ǫ)
V (ǫ)
≤ (ρ(Φ) − 1)
X
(κβ + dξ(|κ|))ǫβγ +
β,γ∈I
X
νβ (κβ + dξ(|κ|)).
β∈I
Let us fix c > 0. Consider the set
K
=
2
ǫ ∈ Rd+ (ρ(Φ) − 1)
X
(κβ + ξ(|κ|))ǫβγ +
β,γ∈I
X
β∈I
Since ρ(Φ) − 1 < 0, K is a compact set. We have thus :
28
νβ (κβ + dξ(|κ|)) ≥ −c
.
LV (ǫ) ≤ −cV (ǫ) + sup |LV (y)| + c sup V (y),
y∈K
y∈K
which is the desired drift condition.
We now show in the following lemma that E is a ψ-irreducible T-chain. See [25], Chapters 4 and 6, for more
information about this concept.
Lemma 6.3. For t ∈ R+ , let Qt be the transition kernel associated to E(t), i.e. for any ǫ ∈ Rd×d
and
+
d×d
A ∈ B(R+ ),
Qt (ǫ, A) = P[E(t) ∈ A|E(0) = ǫ].
E verifies the following properties :
(i) E is a T-chain, i.e. there exists a non-trivial kernel T such that for any A ∈ B(Rd×d
+ ), T(., A) is lower
semi-continuous, and
Q(., A) ≥ T(., A).
(ii) E is ψ-irreducible.
Every compact set is thus a petite set.
We denote by (Tn )n∈N the stopping times associated to the jumps of N . In other words, Tk represents the
time of the k-th jump of N , and we arbitrarily define T0 = 0. We also write ∆Tn = Tn − Tn−1 and finally Kn
for the label in I for which the jump has occured, i.e. Kn is a random variable that takes values in I and that
is the only β ∈ I such that ∆NTβn = 1. The following result is well-known :
P
P
Lemma 6.4. for an initial state E(0) = ǫ, write µα (t, ǫ) = να + β∈I ǫαβ e−aαβ t , and µ(t, ǫ) = α∈I µα (t, ǫ).
Then :
(i) ∆T1 has the distribution density (with respect to Lebesgue measure) f ∆T1 (t|E(0) = ǫ) = f (t, ǫ) = µ(t, ǫ)e−
(ii) Moreover, conditionnally to ∆T1 , K1 has the distribution P[K1 = β|∆T1 , E(0) = ǫ] =
Rt
0
µ(s,ǫ)ds
β
µ (∆T1 ,ǫ)
µ(∆T1 ,ǫ) .
Proof of Lemma 6.3. By an immediate application of the strong Markovian property and Lemma 6.4, we easily
get that for any j ≥ 1,
f ∆Tj (t|E(Tj−1 )) = f (t, E(Tj−1 )),
and
P[Kj = β|∆Tj , E(Tj−1 )] =
µβ (∆Tj , E(Tj−1 ))
,
µ(∆Tj , E(Tj−1 ))
and thus, the joint density of (∆T1 , K1 , ..., ∆Tn , Kn ) given E(0) = ǫ can be written as
f (∆T1 ,K1 ,...,∆Tn,Kn ) (t1 , k1 , ..., tn , kn |ǫ)
=
µkn (tn , ǭ(t1 , k1 , ..., tn−1 , kn−1 |ǫ))
f (tn , ǭ(t1 , ..., tn−1 , kn−1 |ǫ)) × ...
µ(tn , ǭ(t1 , k1 , ..., tn |ǫ))
...
×
µk1 (t1 , ǫ)
f (t1 , ǫ),
µ(t1 , ǫ)
where ǭ(t1 , k1 , ..., tj , kj |ǫ) is the value of E(Tj ) when (∆T1 , K1 , ..., ∆Tn , Kn ) = (t1 , k1 , ..., tj , kj ), i.e.
29
.
ǭαβ (t1 , k1 , ..., tj , kj |ǫ) = e−(t1 +...+tj ) ǫαβ +
X
cαβ e−aαβ (ti+1 +...+tj ) .
i≤j|ki =β
Note that in particular both ǭ(t1 , k1 , ..., tj , kj |ǫ) and f (∆T1 ,K1 ...,∆Tn,Kn ) are C ∞ in (t1 , ..., tn ) and in ǫ. We
now show that Qt has a lower semi-continuous component T. To do this, consider first the following domination,
for ǫ ∈ Rd×d
and A ∈ B(Rd×d
+
+ ) :
Qt (ǫ, A)
= P[E(t) ∈ A|E(0) = ǫ]
≥ P {E(t) ∈ A} ∩ {#{j|Tj ≤ t} = d2 } ∩
\n
∆NTβ(β−1)d+i
β∈I
o
= 1, i ≤ d |E(0) = ǫ .
We thus select only events for which there are exactly d2 jumps before t, and the first d jumps occur on
N , the next d ones occur on N 2 , and so on. In that case, the value of E(t) is completely determined by
(t, T1 , ..., Td2 ), and has the form
1
ǭαβ (t, T1 , ..., Td2 |ǫ) = ǫαβ e−aαβ t +
X
cαβ e−aαβ (t−T1 +...+Ti ) .
(β−1)d≤i≤βd−1
2
Again, ǫ → ǭ(t, t1 , ..., td |ǫ) is C ∞ in ǫ. For conciseness, we write φn (t1 , ..., tn |ǫ) for f (∆T1 ,K1 ,...,∆Tn,Kn ) (t1 , k1 , ..., tn , kn |ǫ)
with each ki equal to the unique β such that (β − 1)d ≤ i ≤ βd − 1 and kd2 +1 is any arbitrary β (it plays no
role). We have thus
Qt (ǫ, A) ≥
Z
···
Z
2 +1
d
R+
1{ǭ(t,t1 ,...,td2 |ǫ)∈A} 1{t1 +...+td2 <t}∩{t1 +...+td2 +1 >t} φd2 +1 (t1 , ..., td2 |ǫ)dt1 ..dtd2 +1 .
Since the indicator 1{ǭ(t,t1 ,...,td2 |ǫ)∈A} is not lower semi-continous in ǫ whenever A is not open, we need to
remove the dependency of this term in ǫ by a change of variable. Consider the transformation
Ψǫ : (t1 , ..., td2 ) → Ψǫ (t1 , ..., td2 ) = ǫ(t, t1 , ..., td2 |ǫ).
Ψǫ is clearly C ∞ in its argument and in ǫ. We write JΨǫ (t1 , ..., tn ) = |det∇Ψǫ (t1 , ..., tn )| the determinant
of the Jacobian matrix of Ψǫ at the point (t1 , ..., tn ). Tedious but straightforward computation leads to the
following representation of the Jacobian :
∗
···
∗
M2 (t1 , ..., t2d ) · · ·
..
..
.
.
∗
..
.
M1 (t1 , ..., td )
0
..
.
JΨǫ (t1 , ..., td2 ) =
···
0
=
Y
···
Md (t1 , ..., td2 )
Ji (t1 , ..., tid ),
i∈I
where Jk (t1 , ..., tkd ) = detMk (t1 , ..., tkd ). Note that in particular it does not depend on ǫ. Thus it is sufficient
to show that under some conditions, each Jk 6= 0. Again, after elementary linear operations on the Mk ’s, it is
possible to represent |Jk | as follows :
30
1
Jk (t1 , ..., tkd ) =
Y
e
cik aik e−aik (t−t1 −...−t1+(k−1)d )
a1k t2+(k−1)d
..
.
i∈I
ea1k (t2+(k−1)d +...+tdk )
···
···
···
..
.
···
..
.
···
···
1
e
adk t2+(k−1)d
..
.
.
ea1k (t2+(k−1)d +...+tdk )
Telling if Jk 6= 0 is not easy for general (t1 , ..., td2 ). On the other hand, if there exists k ∈ I and two
indices i, j ∈ I such that aik = ajk , two columns of the determinant are equal and thus Jk = 0. Jk also vanishes if one cij = 0. For now let’s assume for simplicity that for any k ∈ I, for any i, j ∈ I, aik 6= ajk , and cij 6= 0.
Note that if t1 = ... = td2 = t0 > 0, each Jk is a Vandermonde determinant, and thus
Jk (t0 , ..., t0 )
=
Y
cik aik e−aik (t−(1+(k−1)d)t0 )
i∈I
Y
(e−alk t0 − e−ajk t0 ) 6= 0.
j≥l
By continuity, if all the ti ’s are close enough to each other, say, belong to some interval ]t0 − η, t0 + η[ for η
small enough and such that t0 − η > 0, we have JΨǫ 6= 0. Writing
B(t1 , ..., td2 +1 ) = {(t1 , ..., td2 ) ∈]t0 − η, t0 + η[} ∩ {t1 + ... + td2 < t} ∩ {t1 + ... + td2 +1 > t},
we have by change of variable
Qt (ǫ, A)
≥
=
Z
Z
···
···
Z
2 +1
d
R+
Z
1{ǭ(t,t1 ,...,td2 |ǫ)∈A} 1{B(t1 ,...,td2+1 )} φd2 +1 (t1 , ..., td2 +1 |ǫ)dt1 ...dtd2 +1
2
Ψǫ (Rd
+ )×R+
1{(y1 ,...,yd2 )∈A} 1{B(Ψ−1
ǫ (y1 ,...,y
d2 ),td2 +1 )}
···
−1
· · · φd2 +1 Ψ−1 (y1 , ..., yd2 ), td2 +1 |ǫ JΨǫ Ψ−1
dy1 ...dyd2 dtd2 +1 .
ǫ (y1 , ..., yd2 )
Finally, it is easy to see that B(Ψǫ−1 (y1 , ..., yd2 ), td2 +1 ) is a countable union of open intervals whose boundaries
−1
depend continuously on ǫ, and 1B(Ψ−1
and
) is thus lower semi-continuous in ǫ. Because φd2 +1 , Ψ
ǫ (y1 ,...,y 2 ),t 2
d
d +1
JΨ are continuous in their component and in ǫ, this finally shows that Qt has a non-trivial lower semi-continuous
component T, and E is a T-chain.
Since 0 is trivially a reachable point for E, Proposition 6.2.1 in [25] implies that E is ψ-irreducible. Thus
Theorem 6.2.5 (ii) in [25] implies that every compact set is petite, and we are done.
Remark 3. If there exists k, i, j ∈ I such that aik = ajk = a the kernel of E is degenerate. On the other hand,
one can easily see that, if cjk 6= 0,
Z t
cik
ǫjk (t).
ǫik (t) = cik
e−a(t−s) dNsk =
cjk
0
Thus by reducing the dimension of the state space of E, i.e. putting Ẽ = [ǫαβ ]αβ∈I2 −(i,k) , we see that
Ẽ is obviously still Markovian. We can also do this operation whenever some cij is null. E˜ is then still a
Markovian process but verifies the non-degeneracy conditions on A and C. In practice we can therefore assume
the non-degeneracy condition, since the ergodicity of the reduced process implies obviously the ergodicity of E.
We finally turn to the verification of [B2], [M2], and [B4] to complete the proof of Theorem 4.6.
31
Lemma 6.5. The parametric exponential Hawkes model verifies [B2].
Proof. Points (ii) and (iii) are immediate since for any t ∈ R+ and α ∈ I we have λα (t, θ) ≥ ν > 0. Before
showing (i), note that any component of ∂θi λ(t, θ), (i ≤ 3) can be expressed as a linear combination of the
following terms :
≤ ν̄,
Z t−
≤
c̄(t − s)j e−a(t−s) dNsβ ,
0
Z t−
(t − s)j e−a(t−s) dNsβ ,
≤
να
Z
t−
cαβ (t − s)j e−aαβ (t−s) dNsβ
0
t−
Z
0
(t − s)j e−aαβ (t−s) dNsβ
0
for j ≤ 3. It is thus sufficient to show that for any p > 0, α, β ∈ I,
sup E
t∈R+
p
t−
Z
(t − s)j e−a(t−s) dNsβ
0
< +∞.
Without loss of generality we may assume that p = 2k , k ≥ 1. Using Lemma 6.2 again, we have for some
constant B depending on k only,
E
Z
0
2k
t−
j −a(t−s)
(t − s) e
dNsβ
≤
BE
t−
Z
(t − s)
0
+
BE
Z
∗
λ (s, θ )ds + BE
e
Z
0
2k
t−
j −a(t−s) β
(t − s) e
0
=
2k j −2k a(t−s) β
2k−1
t−
2j −2a(t−s) β
(t − s) e
λ (s, θ )ds
∗
λ (s, θ )ds
I + II + III.
Since for any q ∈ N, E[λ(s, θ∗ )q ] converges to a finite value whenever s → +∞ (it is an immediate consequence
of the V -geometric ergodicity shown in Proposition 4.5), for all β ∈ I, we bound from above E[λβ (s, θ∗ )q ] by
R +∞
some common value mq . We also write M (m, r) = 0 um e−ru du < +∞ for every m ∈ N and r > 0. To
control I, write :
I
≤ Bm1
Z
t
0
k
k
(t − s)2 j e−2
a(t−s)
ds
≤ Bm1 M (2k j, 2k a).
To deal with II, put q = 2k−1 . If t = 0, we trivially have II = 0. When t > 0, by Jensen’s inequality applied
2as
to the probability measure µ(ds) = R et e2asdsds on [0, t], we have
0
II
= E
Z
≤
Z
≤
Z
≤
t−
0
t
e
q
(t − s)2j e−2a(t−s) λβ (s, θ∗ )ds
2as
ds
0
t
e
2as
ds
0
q
E
q−1
Z
0
e
t−
q
(t − s)2qj e−2aqt λβ (s, θ∗ ) µ(ds)
−2a(q−1)t
1
M (2qj, 2a)mq .
(2a)q−1
E
Z
0
Finally III is dominated as II.
32
t−
q
(t − s)2qj e−2a(t−s) λβ (s, θ∗ ) ds
∗
Lemma 6.6. The parametric exponential Hawkes model verifies [M2].
Proof of Lemma 6.6. Let us deal with the mixing condition first. Consider two elements φ, ψ of D↑ (E, R). Note
that since the exponential Hawkes process intensities are bounded from below it is sufficient to consider the case
where φ, ψ and their derivatives are of polynomial growth in their arguments. Define thus for α ∈ I,
X α (t, θ)
(λα (t, θ∗ ), λα (t, θ), ∂θ λα (t, θ)),
=
and its truncation at s ≤ t :
X̃ α (s, t, θ)
λα (t, θ∗ ),
=
XZ
β∈I
s
t
hαβ (t − u, θ)dNuβ ,
XZ
β∈I
We then write, for some s ≤ t − u,
|Cov[φ(X(t, θ)), ψ(X(t + u, θ))]|
≤
+
s
t
∂θ hαβ (t − u, θ)dNuβ .
Cov[φ(X(t, θ)), ψ(X̃(t + s, t + u, θ))]
h
i
Cov φ(X(t, θ)), ∇ψ(ξ(t + s, t + u, θ)) X(t + u, θ) − X̃(t + s, t + u, θ)
= A1 (θ) + A2 (θ),
h
i
where ξ(t + s, t + u, θ) ∈ X̃(t + s, t + u, θ), X(t + u, θ) . It is easy to see that, given the exponential kernel of
the intensities, there exists ã, such that for any m ≥ 1,
sup E X(t + u, θ) − X̃(t + s, t + u, θ)
2
=
O(e−ã(u−s) ).
θ∈Θ
Therefore, as ψ, ∇ψ and φ are of polynomial growth, this leads to
sup A2 (θ)
=
O(e−ã(u−s) )
θ∈Θ
For a random variable φ(Z), we now write φ̂(Z) for φ(Z) − E[φ(Z)]. We thus have
A1 (θ)
=
=
=
h
i
E φ̂(X(t, θ))ψ̂(X̃(t + s, t + u, θ))
h
h
ii
E
E φ̂(X(t, θ))E ψ̂(X̃(t + s, t + u, θ)) | Ft+s
h
ii
h
E φ̂(X(t, θ))E ψ̂(X̃(t + s, t + u, θ)) | Et+s ,
where we have applied the strong Markovian property to thehprocess ψ̂(X̃(t + s, t + u, θ))
i which is measurable
with respect to the σ-algebra σ{Ev |t + s ≤ v ≤ t + u}. As E ψ̂(X̃(t + s, t + u, θ)) | Et+s is a function of Et+s ,
u − s and θ, we denote it by F (Et+s , u − s, θ). Note that F (Et+s , u − s, θ) is centered. We thus get
A1 (θ)
=
=
=
h
i
E φ̂(X(t, θ))F (Et+s , u − s, θ)
h
i
E φ̂(X(t, θ))E F (Et+s , u − s, θ)|FtE
i
h
E φ̂(X(t, θ))E [F (Et+s , u − s, θ)|Et ] ,
33
using once again the strong Markovian property. Again, because of the poynomial growth of ψ and the uniform
boundedness of the moments of Ev in v ∈ R+ , one can easily check that F (Et+s , u − s, θ) can be bounded from
above uniformly
of u − s and θ, and
√ in u − s and θ by some measurable random variable F (Et+s ) independent
√
dominated by V up to a multiplication by a constant factor. Finally, as E is also V -geometrically ergodic
(see [25], lemma 15.2.5), we have that, since F (Et+s , u − s, θ) is centered,
|E [F (Et+s , u − s, θ)|Et ]| ≤
Rrs
From here, we can conclude for A1 (θ) that
A1 (θ)
≤
p
V (Et ).
i
h
p
Rrs E φ̂(X(t, θ))
V (Et )
and thus, using Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and the uniform boundedness of E [V (Et )], (it is an easy consequence
of Dynkin’s formula, see e.g. [24]), we get that
s
sup A1 (θ) ≤ Rr sup E
θ∈Θ
θ∈Θ
φ̂(X(t, θ))
2
21
1
E[V (Et )] 2 ,
thus
A1 (θ)
=
O(rs ).
Setting s = u2 , we finally get that there exists some r̃ < 1 such that
sup |Cov[φ(X(t, θ)), ψ(X(t + u, θ))]| =
O(r̃u ),
θ∈Θ
which shows the mixing condition with an exponential rate. We now turn to the stability condition. As in [M2],
for a process Y , Ȳ designates its stationary version if it exists. We have
tγ E φ(X(t, θ)) − φ(X̄(t, θ))
≤ tγ E |∇φ(ξ(t, θ))| X(t, θ) − X̄(t, θ)
for some ξ(t, θ) ∈ [X(t, θ), X̄(t, θ)]. The right hand side can be split as follows :
tγ E |∇φ(ξ(t))| X(t, θ) − X̄(t, θ)
≤
≤
tγ E |∇φ(ξ(t))| 1{∇φ(ξ(t))≤t1+γ } + 1{∇φ(ξ(t))>t1+γ } X(t, θ) − X̄(t, θ)
i
h
3
t1+2γ |X(t, θ) − X̄(t, θ)| 1 + t−1 E |∇φ(ξ(t))| X(t, θ) − X̄(t, θ) .
Finally, thanks to Proposition 4.4 (iii), and because each X α (t, θ) − X̄ α (t, θ) can be represented as a sum of
integrals with respect to the measures dN β − dN̄ β for β ∈ I, |X(t, θ) − X̄(t, θ)| 1 is exponentially decreasing
uniformly in θ and thus the first term on the right hand side tends to zero. For the second term, it is sufficient
to notice that the expectation is uniformly bounded in t and θ.
Lemma 6.7. The exponential Hawkes model statisfies the non-degeneracy condition [B4].
Proof. We first show that whenever θ 6= θ∗ , Y(θ) 6= 0. consider thus θ ∈ Θ and assume that Y(θ) = 0. As
X
λ̄α (t, θ) α
α
α
∗
∗
−Y(θ) =
E λ̄ (t, θ) − λ̄ (t, θ ) − log α
λ̄ (t, θ ) ,
λ̄ (t, θ∗ )
α∈I
34
and, for any α ∈ I,
λ̄α (t, θ) − λ̄α (t, θ∗ ) − log
λ̄α (t, θ) α
λ̄ (t, θ∗ ) ≥
λ̄α (t, θ∗ )
0,
we thus have
λ̄α (t, θ) − λ̄α (t, θ∗ ) − log
λ̄α (t, θ) α
λ̄ (t, θ∗ )
λ̄α (t, θ∗ )
= 0 P-a.s.,
and it is easy to see that this in turn implies that for any t ∈ R+ , and any α ∈ I,
λ̄α (t, θ)
=
λ̄α (t, θ∗ ) P-a.s.
Now, as the trajectories of λ(., θ) are left continuous for any θ ∈ Θ, we can conclude that P-a.s., the whole
trajectories of λ(., θ) and λ(., θ∗ ) coincide. We have thus, P-a.s.,
να −
να∗
XZ
=
β∈I
t
−∞
∗
c∗αβ e−aαβ (t−s) − cαβ e−aαβ (t−s) dN̄sβ ,
(6.1)
but as the left hand side is constant, the right hand side, which is a jump process, must have jumps of size zero,
and thus C = C ∗ . It is then easy to see that the right hand side is now C 1 in the variable t, and its derivative
must be zero. Taking the derivative on both side this gives
0 =
XZ
β∈I
t
−∞
∗
c∗αβ a∗αβ e−aαβ (t−s) − cαβ aαβ e−aαβ (t−s) dN̄sβ .
Provided that the cαβ are non zeros, we get that A = A∗ . Finally the right side of (6.1) vanishes and
ν = ν ∗ . We now turn
h to the proof of the second part
i of the lemma. [B4] holds true if the Fisher information
P
1
α
∗ T
α
∗
matrix Γ = α∈I E λ̄α (t,θ∗ ) ∂θ λ̄ (t, θ )∂θ λ̄ (t, θ ) is positive definite. Let us rewrite the elements of θ in the
following order : First a11 · · · a1d c11 · · · c1d ν1 , the parameters involved in the writing of λ̄1 (., θ∗ ),
2d+1 d
) , such that
then those involved in the writing of λ̄2 (., θ∗ ) and so on. Fix thus x = x1 · · · xd ∈ (R+
xT Γx = 0, and let us show that x = 0. As the expression of Γ is a block diagonal matrix, we have for any
t ∈ R+ that
0
= xT Γx
X
=
xTα E
1
α
∗ T
α
∗
∂θ λ̄ (t, θ )∂θ λ̄ (t, θ ) xα
λ̄α (t, θ∗ )
α∈I
X
2
1
α
∗
=
E α
∂θ λ̄ (t, θ )xα .
λ̄ (t, θ∗ )
α∈I
As for the first part of the proof, it implies that for any α ∈ I the following process is null almost surely :
∂θ λ̄α (., θ∗ )xα = 0 P-a.s.
In particular it admits derivatives and those derivatives have no jumps. Writing xα = (xα,a , xα,c , xα,ν ), by
an immediate induction we get for any n ≥ 1 and any α, β ∈ I
35
n−1 β
ncαβ aαβ
xα,a − anαβ xβα,c
=
0,
and thus
cαβ xβα,a −
aαβ β
x
n α,c
=
0.
Taking n → +∞, we get xβα,a = 0 and thus xβα,c = 0. Finally, this implies that
0 = ∂θ λ̄α (., θ∗ )xα = xα,ν ,
and thus xα = 0.
References
[1] F. Abergel and A. Jedidi. A mathematical approach to order book modeling. International Journal of
Theoretical and Applied Finance, 16(05):1350025, 2013.
[2] F. Abergel and A. Jedidi. Long time behaviour of a hawkes process-based limit order book. Available at
SSRN 2575498, 2015.
[3] R. A. Adams and J. J. Fournier. Sobolev spaces, volume 140. Academic press, 2003.
[4] S. Asmussen. Applied probability and queues, volume 51. Springer Science & Business Media, 2008.
[5] E. Bacry, S. Delattre, M. Hoffmann, and J.-F. Muzy. Modelling microstructure noise with mutually exciting
point processes. Quantitative Finance, 13(1):65–77, 2013.
[6] E. Bacry, T. Jaisson, and J.-F. Muzy. Estimation of slowly decreasing hawkes kernels: Application to high
frequency order book modelling. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.7096, 2014.
[7] E. Bacry, I. Mastromatteo, and J.-F. Muzy. Hawkes processes in finance. arXiv preprint arXiv:1502.04592,
2015.
[8] P. Billingsley. Ergodic theory and information. 1965.
[9] J.-P. Bouchaud, J. D. Farmer, and F. Lillo. How markets slowly digest changes in supply and demand.
Fabrizio, How Markets Slowly Digest Changes in Supply and Demand (September 11, 2008), 2008.
[10] P. Brémaud and L. Massoulié. Stability of nonlinear hawkes processes. The Annals of Probability, pages
1563–1588, 1996.
[11] R. Cont and A. De Larrard. Order book dynamics in liquid markets: limit theorems and diffusion approximations. Available at SSRN 1757861, 2012.
[12] R. Cont and A. De Larrard. Price dynamics in a markovian limit order market. SIAM Journal on Financial
Mathematics, 4(1):1–25, 2013.
[13] R. Cont, S. Stoikov, and R. Talreja. A stochastic model for order book dynamics. Operations research,
58(3):549–563, 2010.
[14] J. Hájek. Local asymptotic minimax and admissibility in estimation. In Proceedings of the sixth Berkeley
symposium on mathematical statistics and probability, volume 1, pages 175–194, 1972.
[15] A. G. Hawkes. Point spectra of some mutually exciting point processes. Journal of the Royal Statistical
Society. Series B (Methodological), pages 438–443, 1971.
36
[16] W. Huang, C.-A. Lehalle, and M. Rosenbaum. Simulating and analyzing order book data: The queuereactive model. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 110(509):107–122, 2015.
[17] W. Huang and M. Rosenbaum. Ergodicity and diffusivity of markovian order book models: a general
framework. arXiv preprint arXiv:1505.04936, 2015.
[18] I. A. Ibragimov and R. Z. Has’minskii. Statistical estimation: asymptotic theory, volume 16. Springer
Science & Business Media, 2013.
[19] J. Jacod and A. Shiryaev. Limit theorems for stochastic processes, volume 288. Springer Science & Business
Media, 2013.
[20] O. Kallenberg. Foundations of modern probability. Springer Science & Business Media, 2006.
[21] Y. A. Kutoyants. Parameter estimation for stochastic processes, volume 6. Heldermann, 1984.
[22] Y. A. Kutoyants. Statistical inference for spatial Poisson processes, volume 134. Springer Science & Business
Media, 2012.
[23] S. P. Meyn and R. L. Tweedie. Stability of markovian processes ii: continuous-time processes and sampled
chains. Advances in Applied Probability, pages 487–517, 1993.
[24] S. P. Meyn and R. L. Tweedie. Stability of markovian processes iii: Foster-lyapunov criteria for continuoustime processes. Advances in Applied Probability, pages 518–548, 1993.
[25] S. P. Meyn and R. L. Tweedie. Markov chains and stochastic stability. Springer Science & Business Media,
2012.
[26] S. Mike and J. D. Farmer. An empirical behavioral model of liquidity and volatility. Journal of Economic
Dynamics and Control, 32(1):200–234, 2008.
[27] I. Muni Toke. The order book as a queueing system: average depth and influence of the size of limit orders.
Quantitative Finance, 15(5):795–808, 2015.
[28] D. Oakes. The markovian self-exciting process. Journal of Applied Probability, pages 69–77, 1975.
[29] Y. Ogata. The asymptotic behaviour of maximum likelihood estimators for stationary point processes.
Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 30(1):243–261, 1978.
[30] T. Ogihara and N. Yoshida. Quasi likelihood analysis for point process regression models. preprint, 2015.
[31] T. Ozaki. Maximum likelihood estimation of hawkes’ self-exciting point processes. Annals of the Institute
of Statistical Mathematics, 31(1):145–155, 1979.
[32] Y. Potiron. Estimating the integrated parameter of the locally parametric model in high-frequency data.
Working paper, 2015.
[33] M. L. Puri and P. D. Tuan. Maximum likelihood estimation for stationary point processes. Proceedings of
the National Academy of Sciences, 83(3):541–545, 1986.
[34] E. Smith, J. D. Farmer, L. s. Gillemot, S. Krishnamurthy, et al. Statistical theory of the continuous double
auction. Quantitative finance, 3(6):481–514, 2003.
[35] I. M. Toke. ” market making” behaviour in an order book model and its impact on the bid-ask spread.
arXiv preprint arXiv:1003.3796, 2010.
[36] I. M. Toke. Stationary distribution of the volume at the best quote in a poisson order book model. arXiv
preprint arXiv:1502.03871, 2015.
[37] P. D. Tuan. Estimation of the spectral parameters of a stationary point process. The Annals of Statistics,
pages 615–627, 1981.
37
[38] M. Uchida and N. Yoshida. Information criteria in model selection for mixing processes. Statistical Inference
for Stochastic Processes, 4(1):73–98, 2001.
[39] N. Yoshida. Polynomial type large deviation inequalities and quasi-likelihood analysis for stochastic differential equations. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 63(3):431–479, 2011.
[40] B. Zheng, F. Roueff, and F. Abergel. Modelling bid and ask prices using constrained hawkes processes:
Ergodicity and scaling limit. SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics, 5(1):99–136, 2014.
38
| 10math.ST
|
Half-CNN: A General Framework for Whole-Image Regression
Jun Yuan
National University of Singapore
Singapore 117583
Bingbing Ni
Advanced Digital Sciences Center
Singapore 138632
Ashraf A.Kassim
National University of Singapore
Singapore 117583
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
Abstract
The Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) has achieved
great success in image classification. The classification
model can also be utilized at image or patch level for
many other applications, such as object detection and
segmentation. In this paper, we propose a whole-image
CNN regression model, by removing the full connection
layer and training the network with continuous feature
maps. This is a generic regression framework that fits
many applications. We demonstrate this method through
two tasks: simultaneous face detection & segmentation,
and scene saliency prediction. The result is comparable
with other models in the respective fields, using only a
small scale network. Since the regression model is trained
on corresponding image / feature map pairs, there are no
requirements on uniform input size as opposed to the
classification model. Our framework avoids classifier
design, a process that may introduce too much manual
intervention in model development. Yet, it is highly
correlated to the classification network and offers some
in-deep review of CNN structures.
1. Introduction
Figure 1: Example applications of the CNN regression
model. The top two rows demonstrate our model on
simultaneous face detection and segmentation, and the
bottom two rows demonstrate our model on scene saliency
prediction. The columns correspond to the input images,
ground truth feature maps, network output and results
interpretation.
The image classification techniques have evolved vastly
in recent years, from Bag-of-Visual-Words (BoVW) [1,
2], Fisher Vector (FV) Encoding [3], to the state-of-the-art
Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) [4]. The BoVW
and FV models typically consist of a pipeline, with
cascading processes of feature description, dictionary
building and feature encoding, pooling over image and
classification. A linear SVM classifier is used at final
stage, and the whole process can be considered as a nonlinear classification model on images. These techniques
have been extensively studied in [5, 6]. The CNN
classification model consists of several convolution blocks
followed by fully connected layers. Each convolution
block consists of a convolution layer with a non-linear
activation, a pooling layer, and sometimes a local
normalization layer [7]. The fully connected layer can be
considered as a final pooling layer, which feeds the image
feature to the classifier. The CNN model typically uses a
softmax classifier at the training stage. After training, the
softmax classifier is often replaced by an SVM classifier
on the final image representations, for improved
classification performance. Sometimes the SVM is
directly used in the network training process.
The key advance of CNN lies in its ability to learn
adaptive features, as opposed to the hand-crafted features
like SIFT [8] in BoVW and FV models. These handcrafted features are intuitive for human perception; they
can also be considered as a shallow network. The former
convolution blocks in CNN perform similar tasks as these
feature detectors; however the learned features are more
optimized for the given task. Similar statements hold for
the encoding process. The linear SVM classifier at output
is also a shallow network. Thus the classification pipeline
can be treated as a (relatively) shallow network consisting
of hand-crafted function blocks, whereas CNN is a deep
1
network consisting of optimized blocks. This explains the
great success of CNN in classification tasks. The CNN
classification model achieves state-of-the-art performance
on classification datasets such as ImageNet ILSVRC [9]
and PASCAL VOC challenges [10]. A comprehensive
study can be found in [11]. The pre-trained ImageNet
model [12, 13, 14] is also successful in generalizing to
other image classification datasets.
The CNN is also widely applied on non-classification
tasks, such as object detection [15, 16] and segmentation
[17, 16]. The model can be either applied on image level,
or patch level with information aggregation. The
ImageNet pre-trained model is also widely used in these
applications.
However, it seems that CNN is not so widely used in
regression tasks, which is also a fundamental problem in
machine learning. Regression and classification problems
are highly correlated [18], and can be transferred to the
other in many scenarios. For example, the softmax
classifier is related to the softmax regression [19], and the
SVM classifier is based on geometric regression. It is
natural to develop a deep CNN model for regression tasks
as a counterpart of classification.
In this paper, we propose a simple but generic 2D CNN
regression model. By removing the fully connected
layer(s) in the classification network, we yield a network
output that is locally correlated with network input (due to
the locality of convolution operation); this is also the key
characteristic of local regression models. The final output
feature map is generated through a linear combination of
convolution channels, which can be considered as a
partially connected layer. Thus we can get a 2D local
regression network out of the classification network. We
also propose an up-sampling layer to reduce the downsampling effects from pooling operations. The relationship
between the classification and regression networks is
discussed in detail in section 5.
The ground truth to train the regression network are
feature maps generated from input images. The size of the
maps is related with input images, either identical or with
a pre-defined down-sampling factor. These two scenarios
correspond to the convolution and pooling operations in
the neural network. Since there is no fully connected layer,
our model does not pose a requirement on identical input
size, which can be a problem in the CNN classification
model.
We apply the above framework to two applications:
simultaneous face detection & segmentation and saliency
prediction. In the former task, the ground truth feature
maps are generated by fitting a 2D Gaussian density
function inside the detection window. The trained network
can not only recover the position of faces, but also output
the segmented face regions on the feature map. The
saliency prediction is a natural application of our network,
since the ground truth is already given in real-value
feature maps. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our
work through a small scale regression network.
2. Related Work
Face detection is an important task in computer vision.
There are various models from the appearance to learning
based models [20, 21, 22, 23]. The classical models are
extensively studied in [24]. The CNN models are recently
developed into this field [25]. This paper uses convolution
to generate feature maps, and a SVM classifier to detect
face windows. This approach is similar to the part-based
model object detection [26]. Some other face detection
algorithms are implemented through segmentation [27,
28]; the idea is close to our framework. However, our
network does not need to include any specific knowledge
for facial features, e.g. skin color, to the detection or
segmentation task. The features are fully learned without
manual crafting in our network.
Face detection can also be combined with simultaneous
face landmark localization [29, 30, 31]. Part of our work is
based on Y. Sun et al. [31], where a CNN model is applied
to detect face landmarks. A three-level cascaded network
is used to predict face landmark through a coarse-to-fine
localization process. Their network also uses a regression
model, but different from ours. In their approach, the
network outputs several locations as a fixed-size set of real
numbers, which can be considered as a mapping from the
2D real domain to the 1D real domain, i.e. a 2D-1D
mapping. The CNN classification model maps images to a
fixed finite countable set which can be considered as a 2D0D mapping. A fully connected layer is needed whenever
there is dimension reduction from the input to the output.
As a comparison, our CNN regression model is a 2D-2D
mapping between images and feature maps, where the full
connection is avoided. The work [31] can be considered
as a bridge between the classification CNN model and our
model.
We also test the face landmark localization in our
framework. However, this task heavily depends on the
knowledge of spatial relationship between face landmark
points, and a pure texture approach like ours to give
independent predictions of landmarks is not ideal. The
CNN localization model in Y. Sun et al. [31] also utilizes
the spatial relationship of landmarks implicitly through a
global-to-local refinement. We shall briefly discuss this
point in section 4.
Saliency prediction is another important study field,
serving as a bridge between computer vision and human
perception. The saliency prediction models evolved from
Itti [32], GBVS [33], detection / segmentation models [34,
35], and to more recent CNN-based models [36, 37]. An
extensive study of classical models can be found in [38].
A comparison of these models can be found in [39].
2
Input Image
Max-Pooling
Convolution
Convolution
Max-Pooling
Up-sampling
Linear
Combination
Figure 2: A Schematic of CNN Regression Model. The up-sampling layer is used to maintain the feature size, and the
output is produced by a linear combination on convolution channels. These two layers are specific in our framework.
There are two types of saliency models: bottom-up and
up-to-down saliency model. The former is typically more
focused on human perception process and low level image
information, whereas the latter is more related to scene
knowledge on interest objects. The latter is also highly
related to object detection and segmentation; some models
explicitly use detection and segmentation techniques to
give saliency predictions [34, 35]. The recent CNN models
also offer competitive performance in this field. The eDN
[37] uses a large number of randomly initialized CNNs,
picking those with good performance and aggregates their
output feature maps to give predictions. The latter Deep
Gaze I [36] uses ImageNet pre-trained network without
the full connection layer, and learns a weight on linear
combination of convolution channels. This model offers
the state-of-the-art performance. Our model has a structure
similar to the Deep Gaze model, but trained in a different
way without using classification information.
Since saliency information is provided as feature maps,
this is a natural application fits into our framework. We
use the CNN regression model to train the saliency model
and give comparative studies in section 4. There is also a
detailed discussion in section 5.
The above function computes the feature response at
location (𝑥, 𝑦) by normalizing the responses at the same
location in its 𝑁 neighboring channels. In practice, the
normalization layer can offer limited performance gain,
and is used only in the first two convolution blocks in our
experiments.
There is a limit on the amount of pooling layers that can
be used in our network, due to the size limitation of the
ground truth feature maps. For example, if the feature map
is 4× times smaller than the original image, we can only
use two max-pooling layers with a down-sampling factor
2. There are several ways to get around this: We can either
to use pooling with a stride of 1, or use convolution
without pooling in the following blocks. However, these
two methods reduce the non-linearity of the network,
which is not a desired property.
In this paper, we propose an up-sampling layer, to
maintain the size of intermediate features in the network.
The up-sampling layer follows the pooling layer and
restores the size of pooled features, while retaining the
non-linearity of the network. The up-sampling function is
defined as follows:
𝐴𝑖+1 (𝑝𝑥 − 𝑝 + 1: 𝑝𝑥, 𝑝𝑦 − 𝑝 + 1: 𝑝𝑦) = 𝐴𝑖 (𝑥, 𝑦)
3. Implementation Details
where 𝑝 is the down-sampling factor used in the pooling
layer, typically of the value 2. The above function copies a
value from the pooled features to a 𝑝×𝑝 block in the
following up-sampling layer. The back-propagation rule of
this layer is just the average-pooling layer in the reverse
direction, with a scale of 𝑝2 . Since each block in the upsampling layer consists of the same value, the backpropagation principal of this layer can be simplified as:
Our network consists of several convolution blocks and
an output layer. The convolution blocks follow structure
of [7], and the output layer combines all the feature
channels through a linear combination.
Convolution blocks. Each convolution block includes a
convolution layer, a ReLU activation, and a pooling layer
with a down-sampling factor of 2. Max-pooling is used in
as the pooling function. A normalization layer introduced
in [7] can also be used after the pooling layer, with the
local normalization function below:
𝑑𝐴𝑖 (𝑥, 𝑦) = 𝑝2 𝑑𝐴𝑖+1 (𝑝𝑥, 𝑝𝑦)
Output Layer. The output layer combines the feature
channels from the last convolution block through a linear
combination. Then a sigmoid activation function is applied
to produce the final output. The layer forward and back
propagation rules are shown below:
𝛽
𝑏𝑥,𝑦 = 𝑎𝑥,𝑦 / (𝑘 + 𝛼 ∑
2
(𝑎𝑥,𝑦
))
𝑗∈𝑁(𝑗)
3
derivative of the output feature map to ensure correct
gradient computation. This technique cannot be applied on
the classification network, since the fully connected layer
requires proper arrangement of features. Applying masks
will interrupt the pre-defined feature sequences.
The above padding-masking scheme can also be applied
on filters, if a convolution layer includes filters of different
sizes. However, this seems to be a relatively rare setup in
most of the CNN applications.
𝐴𝑜 = sigm (∑ 𝑤𝑖 𝐴𝑖 + 𝑏) ≜ sigm(𝑍)
𝑖
𝑑𝑍 = (𝑀 ∘ 𝑑𝐴𝑜 ) ∘ 𝐴𝑜 ∘ (1 − 𝐴𝑜 )
=
𝑑𝑤𝑖 = ∑ 𝐴𝑖,𝑥,𝑦 𝑑𝑍𝑥,𝑦 , 𝑑𝑏 = ∑ 𝑑𝑍𝑥,𝑦
𝑥,𝑦
𝑑𝐴𝑖 = 𝑤𝑖 𝑑𝑍
𝑥,𝑦
where 𝐴𝑖 is the convoluted feature channels, 𝑤 and 𝑏 are
the weights and bias of the linear combination. 𝑀 is a
mask indicating the content in images and feature maps,
which is introduced in section 3.1.
Also, it is possible to use other type of combinations,
such as a max-pooling function among all the convolution
channels. However, this function seems to underperform
the linear combination in our experiments.
Since the feature maps consist of real continuous values
(typically ranging from 0 to 1), the network performs a
2D-2D regression task. The structure of our network is
shown in Figure 2.
4. Experiments
We use the above framework for two applications. One
is simultaneous face detection & segmentation on the
LFW face dataset [40], the other is saliency prediction on
the MIT dataset (1003 images version) [41]. The two
networks are both trained on the MatConvNet platform
[42], a Matlab toolbox based on the famous CAFFE [13]
CNN implementation.
4.1. Face Detection & Segmentation
We use 5590 face images from the LFW dataset, with
different viewing angles. All images are of identical size
250×250. We use 4151 images for training and the rest for
testing. The detection window provided in [31] is used as
the ground truth.
3.1. Size considerations in practice
The size of ground truth feature map is typically related
to the input image. Because there are no fully connected
layers in the regression framework, we can bypass the
uniform input size requirement in typical classification
CNNs. If the input sizes are different in the classification
model, the images have to be warped or cropped to the
same size. Different image aspect ratio is also a problem.
However, our regression model can fundamentally avoid
these headaches.
The convolution operation does not depend on image
size; however the layer input needs to be properly padded
according to the filter size, to ensure the correct downsampling factor after pooling. The input and output size of
convolution blocks differ by a factor of 2, if pooling
without up-sampling is used. When an up-sampling layer
is present, the input and output sizes of convolution blocks
are identical.
In theory, the network can accept input images of all
different sizes. The batch gradient can be calculated by
averaging all the individual gradients produced by single
images in the batch. However, for fast computation, it is
recommended that all the images within a batch are
identical in size to utilize the advanced data structure in
typical CNN implementations.
Should the input sizes differ vastly, there is another
convenient way to bypass the uniform-size requirement.
All the input images in a batch can be padded to the same
size, with a mask recording the content of each input. The
ground truth feature maps are padded in accordance with
corresponding images. The mask is then applied to the
Figure 3: Examples of the CNN regression model on
simultaneous face detection & segmentation experiment.
The columns correspond to the input, ground truth, output
features and results interpretation. The network is able to
detect and segment multiple faces.
4
ability of our regression network.
We also tested our regression model on face landmark
localization experiments, based on the work of [31]. The
ground truth feature maps are generated by fitting small
2D Gaussian density functions to the face landmark
positions. However, our network does not perform well on
this application, for that it is a more textural approach,
without incorporating any spatial relationship between
landmarks. This relationship is crucial in this application,
and detecting the landmarks independently through our
framework is not ideal. Some sample detection results are
shown in Figure 4.
The landmark localization network is able to detect
more structural regions like eyes, and fails in the less
structural regions on noses. This is expected because of
the color similarity in nose regions. The structural contents
in eyes are most, and moderate in mouths; noses offer the
least information in textures.
Figure 4: Examples of the CNN regression model on face
landmark localization. The network does not perform well
because the spatial relationship between facial landmarks
is not taken into consideration.
We use a simple technique to generate the ground truth
feature maps: a 2D Gaussian density function is fit at the
center of the detection window, with the diameter (6𝜎𝑥
and 6𝜎𝑦 ) being the window width and height. The size of
input images is padded to 256×256 as stated in section 3,
and a 4× down-sampling is applied to the generated
feature maps.
We use 3 convolution blocks in this experiment. The
first two blocks consist of 5 filters of size 11×11 and 7×7
respectively, with max-pooling and normalization. The
following block consists of 5 filters of size 5×5, with upsampling layer after max-pooling.
For numerical stability, the ground truth feature maps
are re-normalized to [0.1, 0.9] for the sigmoid activation at
the output layer. Also, there is a small 𝐿2 penalty on filter
weights and biases of each layer for regularization. This
penalty terms can prevent the network from over-fitting
and improves generalization ability.
Some sample outputs are shown in Figure 3. The output
feature map is overlayed on input images for visualization.
It can be seen that the output feature maps correspond to
the segmentation of faces in the input. The neck area is
sometimes included in the feature map; this is natural
because of the color similarity between face and neck
areas. Increase the network complexity might relieve this
problem.
The detection window can be retrieved by analyzing the
feature maps: get the center and standard deviation of the
response, and fit the window as the reverse process of
generating Gaussian density functions. The retrieval rate
of detection window is greater than 95% in our
experiments.
Though we train the network with a simple Gaussian
density function in the detection window, the network
surprisingly provides the ability of both detection and
segmentation, with only a small scale network. Moreover,
the network can detect and segment multiple faces as
shown in Figure 1 and 3. This indicates the generalization
4.2. Saliency Prediction
The MIT saliency dataset consists of 1003 indoor and
outdoor scene images. The longest dimension of each
image is 1024 pixels, and the other edge ranges between
405 and 1024 pixels. The aspect ratio is typically around
4:3. The ground truth of saliency prediction is already
provided as feature maps, thus this is an application that
naturally fits our regression framework. We pad the
images to 256×256, and use a down-sampling factor of 4
for feature maps. We use the same network regularization
parameters as in the former face detection & segmentation
experiments.
We use 4 convolution blocks in this experiment. The
first two blocks consist of 10 filters of size 7×7, with maxpooling and local normalization. The following two blocks
Figure 5: Examples of the CNN regression model on
scene saliency prediction on MIT 1003 dataset.
5
Figure 6: Comparison with classical saliency models, under the AUC and sAUC performance metric.
consist of 10 filters of size 5×5, with max-pooling and upsampling.
Some experiment results are shown in Figure 5. We can
see that the network output is highly correlated with the
ground truth saliency map. Some quantitative evaluation
and comparison with other methods are shown in Figure 6.
Our model outperforms most of the classical saliency
prediction methods, while not incorporating any specific
knowledge to saliency studies. We have yet to compare
our model to the latest work, due to the difference in
database and evaluation methods.
Additional experiment results can be found at Figure 7
and 8 for both applications.
classification model, where the former convolution blocks
perform similar feature detection tasks.
The regression model can also be applied on non-image
applications. The convolution operation is local, and
shares similar structure with local regression models, such
as the famous non-linear kernel regression. Thus many
regression works can be reviewed by the CNN regression
model.
Limitations. A limitation of our framework is, the
network requires a very large training set to perform well;
this is the same as other CNN models. For example, the
Deep Gaze I [36] uses ImageNet pre-trained models on
saliency prediction, and achieves best performance. This
amounts to using a large training set in this application.
Nevertheless, getting the ground truth feature maps is not
as easy as getting classification labels, which aggravates
the difficulty in generating training sets.
Prevent Over-fitting. Over-fitting is a very common
problem in regression. Adding regularization terms on
model parameters will prevent over-fitting and achieve
better generalization ability on testing sets. In our CNN
regression model, a simple 𝐿2 penalty on network is
applied as regularization terms. Other types of penalties,
such as the 𝐿1 norm, can offer some desired properties like
sparsity [46, 47, 48, 49]. However, network with these
penalties can be more complex to optimize. Adding
regularization terms alleviates over-fitting by reducing the
effective degrees of freedom (DoF) of the network [18].
For example, a large network will over-fit on simple tasks
like our face detection and segmentation problem; adding
penalties can reduce the effective parameters and make the
network behave like a small-scale network. Determining
the proper DoF or network scale for different applications
is very difficult, and often based on test-and-trial. The
drop-out technique [50] is a famous way to prevent overfitting in neural networks; it is proved to be an adaptive 𝐿2
regularization [51] on networks, which alleviates the test-
Computation Time. Since our regression network is
small in scale, the L-BFGS [43] algorithm is used for fast
convergence. The network can be trained in 2~3 hours and
5~6 hours respectively for the face detection &
segmentation and saliency prediction, with an NVidia K40
graphics card.
5. Discussion
Generality. Our CNN regression model is a general
framework that can be applied on a variety of applications,
where the output is a feature map correlated with input
images. For example, other than our simple face detection
& segmentation, we can generate feature maps on more
complicated segmentation tasks such as the PASCAL
VOC challenge [10] and neuron membrane segmentation
[44] in medical images, with the segmented object as the
ground truth. This is part of our future study on more
advanced detection & segmentation applications.
Also, our framework provides another view of classical
features, such as SIFT and HoG [45]. The output of SIFT
and HoG can be re-interpreted as feature maps to fit our
regression network. Our network is also a part of the CNN
6
and-trial process on penalty selection.
Another way to prevent over-fitting is the data
approach. Providing huge training data to the network can
also be considered as a regularization process: the training
data itself covers the whole space; a network trained on
the whole space data will have better generalization ability
than those trained on a (small) subspace, since the test
example will always lie in the space expanded by training
samples. In other words, the testing phase will always be
an interpolation process rather than extrapolation process;
the latter is known to be much more difficult than the
former. The ImageNet pre-trained model is the big data
approach, and is proved to have good generalization
ability in many other classification tasks. Acquiring large
data is sometimes not possible; data augmentation is often
applied [11] to alleviate the requirement for training data.
Typical data augmentations are geometric transforms on
the image dataset. This offers enlarged space (though still
limited) spanned by the training images.
Relationship with the CNN classification model. The
convolution blocks in our network are identical to those in
the CNN classification model. The linear combination on
convolution channels can be considered as a partially
connected layer, compared to the fully connected layer in
the classification model. Thus by adding another level of
connection over the output feature map, we yield the CNN
classification model.
The feature maps often correspond to the interested
objects, which are also crucial to the classification task.
We can consider the CNN classification model as an
implicit feature map generating process using image class
labels, whereas the regression model uses explicit feature
maps generated by other techniques. The convoluted
features before fully connected layers can be considered as
implicit feature maps corresponding to objects. It might
explain why the ImageNet pre-trained classification model
is also successful in many non-classification applications.
References
[1] Sivic, J. and A. Zisserman. Video Google: a text retrieval
approach to object matching in videos. in Computer Vision,
2003. Proceedings. Ninth IEEE International Conference
on. 2003.
[2] G. Csurka, C.B., C. Dance, and L. Fan, Visual
categorization with bags of keypoints. Workshop on
Statistical Learning in Computer Vision, ECCV, 2004: p. 122.
[3] Perronnin, F., J. Sánchez, and T. Mensink, Improving the
fisher kernel for large-scale image classification, in
Computer Vision–ECCV 2010. 2010, Springer. p. 143-156.
[4] LeCun, Y., et al., Backpropagation applied to handwritten
zip code recognition. Neural computation, 1989. 1(4): p.
541-551.
[5] Chatfield, K., et al., The devil is in the details: an evaluation
of recent feature encoding methods. British Machine Vision
Conference, 2011.
[6] Huang, Y., et al., Feature coding in image classification: a
comprehensive study. IEEE Transactions on Pattern
Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2014. 36(3): p. 493-506.
[7] Krizhevsky, A., I. Sutskever, and G.E. Hinton, ImageNet
Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks,
in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 25.
2012, Curran Associates, Inc. p. 1097-1105.
[8] Lowe, D.G., Distinctive Image Features from ScaleInvariant Keypoints. International Journal of Computer
Vision, 2004. 60(2): p. 91-110.
[9] Deng, J., et al. Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image
database. in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition,
2009. CVPR 2009. IEEE Conference on. 2009. IEEE.
[10] Everingham, M., et al., The pascal visual object classes
(voc) challenge. International journal of computer vision,
2010. 88(2): p. 303-338.
[11] Razavian, A.S., et al., CNN Features off-the-shelf: an
Astounding Baseline for Recognition. arXiv preprint
arXiv:1403.6382, 2014.
[12] Chatfield, K.a.S., K. and Vedaldi, A. and Zisserman, A.,
Return of the Devil in the Details: Delving Deep into
Convolutional Nets. British Machine Vision Conference,
2014.
[13] Jia, Y., et al., Caffe: Convolutional Architecture for Fast
Feature Embedding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1408.5093, 2014.
[14] Simonyan, K. and A. Zisserman, Very Deep Convolutional
Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition. CoRR, 2014.
abs/1409.1556.
[15] Szarvas, M., et al. Pedestrian detection with convolutional
neural networks. in Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, 2005.
Proceedings. IEEE. 2005. IEEE.
[16] Girshick, R., et al., Rich feature hierarchies for accurate
object detection and semantic segmentation. arXiv preprint
arXiv:1311.2524, 2013.
[17] Grassi, G., et al., New object-oriented segmentation
algorithm based on the CNN paradigm. Circuits and
Systems II: Express Briefs, IEEE Transactions on, 2006.
53(4): p. 259-263.
[18] Hastie, T., R. Tibshirani, and J.H. Friedman, The elements
of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and
prediction. 2009, New York: Springer-Verlag New York.
6. Conclusion
We propose a CNN-based regression model trained on
continuous feature maps. The regression network does not
require fully connection layer, and is insensitive to input
sizes. We introduce an up-sampling technique for size
compatibility, and generate output feature maps through a
linear combination on convolution channels. We apply this
framework to face detection & segmentation and saliency
prediction, and demonstrate its generalization ability in
these tasks. Also, this general framework is highly related
to the classification model and has the potential to be
applied on variety of applications.
7
Figure 7: Additional experiment results on simultaneous face detection & segmentation
Figure 8: Additional experiment results on scene saliency prediction
[19] Bishop, C.M., Pattern recognition and machine learning.
Vol. 1. 2006: springer New York.
[20] Turk, M. and A. Pentland, Eigenfaces for recognition.
Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 1991. 3(1): p. 71-86.
[21] Osuna, E., R. Freund, and F. Girosi. Training support vector
machines: an application to face detection. in Computer
Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1997. Proceedings., 1997
IEEE Computer Society Conference on. 1997. IEEE.
[22] Sung, K.-K. and T. Poggio, Example-based learning for
view-based human face detection. Pattern Analysis and
Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on, 1998. 20(1): p.
39-51.
[23] Viola, P. and M. Jones. Rapid object detection using a
boosted cascade of simple features. in Computer Vision and
Pattern Recognition. Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE
Computer Society Conference on (Volume:1 ). 2001.
[24] Li, S.Z., et al., Handbook of face recognition. 2005, New
York: Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
[25] Yin-Nong, C., et al., A CNN-Based Face Detector with a
Simple Feature Map and a Coarse-to-fine Classifier. Pattern
Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on,
2009. PP(99): p. 1-1.
[26] Felzenszwalb, P.F., et al., Object Detection with
Discriminatively Trained Part-Based Models. IEEE
8
[27]
[28]
[29]
[30]
[31]
[32]
[33]
[34]
[35]
[36]
[37]
Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence,
2010. 29(9): p. 1627-1645.
Chai, D. and K.N. Ngan, Face segmentation using skincolor map in videophone applications. Circuits and Systems
for Video Technology, IEEE Transactions on, 1999. 9(4): p.
551-564.
Idrees, H., et al. Multi-source Multi-scale Counting in
Extremely Dense Crowd Images. in Computer Vision and
Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2013 IEEE Conference on.
2013.
Cootes, T.F., G.J. Edwards, and C.J. Taylor, Active
appearance models. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis
and Machine Intelligence, 2001. 23(6): p. 681-685.
Zhu, X. and D. Ramanan. Face detection, pose estimation,
and landmark localization in the wild. in Computer Vision
and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2012 IEEE Conference
on. 2012. IEEE.
Yi, S., W. Xiaogang, and T. Xiaoou. Deep Convolutional
Network Cascade for Facial Point Detection. in Computer
Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2013 IEEE
Conference on. 2013.
Itti, L. and C. Koch, Computational modelling of visual
attention. Nature reviews neuroscience, 2001. 2(3): p. 194203.
Harel, J., C. Koch, and P. Perona. Graph-based visual
saliency. in Advances in neural information processing
systems. 2006.
Zhao, Q. and C. Koch, Learning visual saliency by
combining feature maps in a nonlinear manner using
AdaBoost. Journal of Vision, 2012. 12(6): p. 22.
Xu, J., et al., Predicting human gaze beyond pixels. Journal
of vision, 2014. 14(1): p. 28.
Kümmerer, M., L. Theis, and M. Bethge, Deep Gaze I:
Boosting Saliency Prediction with Feature Maps Trained on
ImageNet. arXiv preprint arXiv:1411.1045, 2014.
Vig, E., M. Dorr, and D. Cox. Large-Scale Optimization of
Hierarchical Features for Saliency Prediction in Natural
Images. in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
(CVPR), 2014 IEEE Conference on. 2014.
[38] Duncan, K. and S. Sarkar, Saliency in images and video: a
brief survey. Computer Vision, IET, 2012. 6(6): p. 514-523.
[39] Bylinskii, Z., et al. MIT Saliency Benchmark.
[40] Huang, G.B., et al. Labeled faces in the wild: A database
forstudying face recognition in unconstrained environments.
in Workshop on Faces in'Real-Life'Images: Detection,
Alignment, and Recognition. 2008.
[41] Judd, T., et al. Learning to predict where humans look. in
Computer Vision, 2009 IEEE 12th international conference
on. 2009. IEEE.
[42] http://www.vlfeat.org/matconvnet/.
[43] Liu, D.C. and J. Nocedal, On the limited memory BFGS
method for large scale optimization. Mathematical
programming, 1989. 45(1-3): p. 503-528.
[44] Ciresan, D., et al. Deep neural networks segment neuronal
membranes in electron microscopy images. in Advances in
neural information processing systems. 2012.
[45] Dalal, N. and B. Triggs. Histograms of oriented gradients
for human detection. in Computer Vision and Pattern
Recognition. Proceedings of the 2005IEEE Computer
Society Conference on
(Volume:1 ). 2005. IEEE
Conference Proceedings.
[46] Tibshirani, R., Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the
Lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society.Series B
(Methodological), 1996. 58(1): p. 267-288.
[47] Zou, H. and T. Hastie, Regularization and Variable
Selection via the Elastic Net. Journal of the Royal Statistical
Society.Series B (Statistical Methodology), 2005. 67(2): p.
301-320.
[48] Clemmensen, L., et al., Sparse Discriminant Analysis.
Technometrics, 2011. 53(4): p. 406.
[49] Jun, Y. and A.A. Kassim. A sparse sampling model for 3D
face recognition. in Image Processing (ICIP), 2013 20th
IEEE International Conference on. 2013.
[50] Hinton, G.E., et al., Improving neural networks by
preventing co-adaptation of feature detectors. CoRR, 2012.
abs/1207.0580.
[51] Wager, S., S. Wang, and P. Liang, Dropout Training as
Adaptive Regularization. ArXiv e-prints, 2013.
9
| 9cs.NE
|
arXiv:1611.06455v4 [cs.LG] 14 Dec 2016
Time Series Classification from Scratch with Deep
Neural Networks: A Strong Baseline
Zhiguang Wang, Weizhong Yan
Tim Oates
GE Global Research
{zhiguang.wang, yan}@ge.com
Computer Science and Electric Engineering
University of Maryland Baltimore County
[email protected]
Abstract—We propose a simple but strong baseline for time
series classification from scratch with deep neural networks. Our
proposed baseline models are pure end-to-end without any heavy
preprocessing on the raw data or feature crafting. The proposed
Fully Convolutional Network (FCN) achieves premium performance to other state-of-the-art approaches and our exploration
of the very deep neural networks with the ResNet structure is
also competitive. The global average pooling in our convolutional
model enables the exploitation of the Class Activation Map
(CAM) to find out the contributing region in the raw data for
the specific labels. Our models provides a simple choice for
the real world application and a good starting point for the
future research. An overall analysis is provided to discuss the
generalization capability of our models, learned features, network
structures and the classification semantics.
I. I NTRODUCTION
Time series data is ubiquitous. Both human activities and
nature produces time series everyday and everywhere, like
weather readings, financial recordings, physiological signals
and industrial observations. As the simplest type of time series
data, univariate time series provides a reasonably good starting point to study such temporal signals. The representation
learning and classification research has found many potential
application in the fields like finance, industry, and health care.
However, learning representations and classifying time series are still attracting much attention. As the earliest baseline,
distance-based methods work directly on raw time series
with some pre-defined similarity measures such as Euclidean
distance or Dynamic time warping (DTW) [1] to perform
classification. The combination of DTW and the k-nearestneighbors classifier is known to be a very efficient approach
as a golden standard in the last decade.
Feature-based methods suppose to extract a set of features
that are able to represent the global/local time series patterns.
Commonly, these features are quantized to form a Bag-ofWords (BoW), then given to the classifiers [2]. Feature-based
approaches mostly differ in the extracted features. To name
a few recent benchmarks, The bag-of-features framework
(TSBF) [3] extracts the interval features with different scales
from each interval to form an instance, and each time series
forms a bag. A supervised codebook is built with the random
forest for classifying the time series. Bag-of-SFA-Symbols
(BOSS) [4] proposes a distance based on the histograms
of symbolic Fourier approximation words. Its extension, the
BOSSVS method [5] combines the BOSS model with the
vector space model to reduce the time complexity and improve
the performance by ensembling the models with difference
window size. The final classification is performed with the
One-Nearest-Neighbor classifier.
Ensemble based approaches combine different classifiers
together to achieve a higher accuracy. Different ensemble
paradigms integrate various feature sets or classifiers. The
Elastic Ensemble (PROP) [6] combines 11 classifiers based on
elastic distance measures with a weighted ensemble scheme.
Shapelet ensemble (SE) [7] produces the classifiers through
the shapelet transform in conjunction with a heterogeneous
ensemble. The flat collective of transform-based ensembles
(COTE) is an ensemble of 35 different classifiers based on the
features extracted from both the time and frequency domains.
All the above approaches need heavy crafting on data
preprocessing and feature engineering. Recently, some effort
has been spent to exploit the deep neural network, especially
convolutional neural networks (CNN) for end-to-end time
series classification. In [8], a multi-channel CNN (MC-CNN)
is proposed for multivariate time series classification. The
filters are applied on each single channel and the features are
flattened across channels as the input to a fully connected
layer. The authors applied sliding windows to enhance the
data. They only evaluate this approach on two multivariate
time series datasets, where there is no published benchmark
for comparison. In [9], the author proposed a multi-scale CNN
approach (MCNN) for univariate time series classification.
Down sampling, skip sampling and sliding windows are used
for preprocessing the data to manually prepare for the multiscale settings. Although this approach claims the state-of-theart performance on 44 UCR time series datasets [10], the heavy
preprocessing efforts and a large set of hyperparameters make
it complicated to deploy. The proposed window slicing method
for data augmentation seems to be ad-hoc.
We provide a standard baseline to exploit deep neural
networks for end-to-end time series classification without any
crafting in feature engineering and data preprocessing. The
deep multilayer perceptrons (MLP), fully convolutional networks (FCN) and the residual networks (ResNet) are evaluated
on the same 44 benchmark datasets with other benchmarks.
Through a pure end-to-end training on the raw time series
data , the ResNet and FCN achieve comparable or better
performance than COTE and MCNN. The global average
pooling in our convolutional model enables the exploitation of
64
Global Pooling
Softmax
128
128
128
128
Global Pooling
Softmax
128
BN + ReLU
BN + ReLU
BN + ReLU
BN + ReLU
BN + ReLU
BN + ReLU
64
BN + ReLU
+
+
BN + ReLU
Input
BN + ReLU
+
64
Softmax
BN + ReLU
128
256
128
(C)ResNet
0.3
BN + ReLU
0.2
500
ReLU
0.2
500
ReLU
Input
500
ReLU
Input
(b)FCN
0.1
BN + ReLU
(a)MLP
128
Fig. 1. The network structure of three tested neural networks. Dash line indicates the operation of dropout.
the Class Activation Map (CAM) to find out the contributing
region in the raw data for the specific labels.
II. N ETWORK A RCHITECTURES
B. Fully Convolutional Networks
We tested three deep neural network architectures to provide
a fully comprehensive baseline.
A. Multilayer Perceptrons
Our plain baselines are basic MLP by stacking three fullyconnected layers. The fully-connected layers each has 500
neurons following two design rules: (i) using dropout [11]
at each layer’s input to improve the generalization capability ;
and (ii) the non-linearity is fulfilled by the rectified linear unit
(ReLU)[12] as the activation function to prevent saturation of
the gradient when the network is deep. The network ends with
a softmax layer. A basic layer block is formalized as
x̃ = fdropout,p (x)
FCN has shown compelling quality and efficiency for semantic segmentation on images [14]. Each output pixel is a
classifier corresponding to the receptive field and the networks
can thus be trained pixel-to-pixel given the category-wise
semantic segmentation annotation.
In our problem settings, the FCN is performed as a feature
extractor. Its final output still comes from the softmax layer.
The basic block is a convolutional layer followed by a batch
normalization layer [15] and a ReLU activation layer. The
convolution operation is fulfilled by three 1-D kernels with the
sizes {8, 5, 3} without striding. The basic convolution block
is
y =W⊗x+b
y = W · x̃ + b
h = ReLU (y)
input layer, hidden layers and the softmax layer are {0.1, 0.2,
0.3}, respectively (Figure 1(a)).
(1)
s = BN (y)
h = ReLU (s)
This architecture is mostly distinguished from the seminal
MLP decades ago by the utilization of ReLU and dropout.
ReLU helps to stack the networks deeper and dropout largely
prevent the co-adaption of the neurons to help the model
generalizes well especially on some small datasets. However,
if the network is too deep, most neuron will hibernate as the
ReLU totally halve the negative part. The Leaky ReLU [13]
might help, but we only use three layers MLP with the ReLU
to provide a fundamental baselines. The dropout rates at the
(2)
⊗ is the convolution operator. We build the final networks
by stacking three convolution blocks with the filter sizes {128,
256, 128} in each block. Unlike the MCNN and MC-CNN, We
exclude any pooling operation. This strategy is also adopted in
the ResNet [16] as to prevent overfitting. Batch normalization
is applied to speed up the convergence speed and help improve
generalization. After the convolution blocks, the features are
fed into a global average pooling layer [17] instead of a fully
connected layer, which largely reduces the number of weights.
The final label is produced by a softmax layer (Figure 1(b)).
the complexity for training and deploying the deep learning
models. 1
C. Residual Network
B. Evaluation
ResNet extends the neural networks to a very deep structures
by adding the shortcut connection in each residual block to
enable the gradient flow directly through the bottom layers.
It achieves the state-of-the-art performance in object detection
and other vision related tasks [16]. We explore the ResNet
structure since we are really interested to see how the very
deep neural networks perform on the time series data. Obviously, the ResNet overfits the training data much easier
because the datasets in UCR is comparatively small and lack
of enough variants to learn the complex structures with such
deep networks, but it is still a good practice to import the
much deeper model and analyze the pros and cons.
We reuse the convolutional blocks in Equation 2 to build
each residual block. Let Blockk denotes the convolutional
block with the number of filters k, the residual block is
formalized as
Table I shows the results and a comprehensive comparison
with eight other best benchmark methods. We report the test
error rate from the best model trained with the minimum crossentropy loss and the number of dataset on which it achieved
the best performance. Some literature (like [9], [5]) also report
the ranks and other ranking-based statistics to evaluate the
performance and make the comparison, so we also provide
the average rankings.
However, neither the number of best-performed dataset
or the ranking based statistics is an unbiased measurement
to compare the performance. The number of best-performed
dataset focuses on the top performance and is highly skewed.
The ranking based statistics is highly sensitive to the model
pools. ”Better than” as a comparative measurement is also
skewed as the input models might arbitrarily changed. All
those evaluation measures wipe out the factor of number of
classes.
We propose a simple evaluation measure, Mean Per-Class
Error (MPCE) to evaluate the classification performance of
the specific models on multiple datasets. For a given model
M = {mi }, a dataset pool D = {dk } with the number of class
label C = {ck } and the corresponding error rate E = {ek },
h1 = Blockk1 (x)
h2 = Blockk2 (h1 )
h3 = Blockk3 (h2 )
y = h3 + x
ĥ = ReLU (y)
(3)
The number of filters ki = {64, 128, 128}. The final ResNet
stacks three residual blocks and followed by a global average
pooling layer and a softmax layer. As this setting simply reuses
the structures of the FCN, certainly there are better structures
for the problem, but our given structures are adequate to
provide a qualified demonstration as a baseline (Figure 1(c)).
III. E XPERIMENTS AND R ESULTS
A. Experiment Settings
We test our proposed neural networks on the same subset
of the UCR time series repository, which includes 44 distinct
time series datasets, to compare with other benchmarks. All
the dataset has been split into training and testing by default.
The only preprocessing in our experiment is z-normalization
on both training and test split with the mean and standard
deviation of the training part for each dataset. The MLP is
trained with Adadelta [18] with learning rate 0.1, ρ = 0.95
and = 1e − 8. The FCN and ResNet are trained with Adam
[19] with the learning rate 0.001, β1 = 0.9, β2 = 0.999 and
= 1e−8. The loss function for all tested model is categorical
cross entropy. We choose the best model that achieves the
lowest training loss and report its performance on the test
set. While this training setting tends to give us a overfitted
configuration and most likely to generalize poorly on the
test set, we can see that our proposed networks generalize
quite well. Unlike other benchmarks, our experiment excludes
the hyperparameter tuning and cross validation to provide
a most unbiased baseline. Such settings also largely reduce
P CEk =
M P CEi =
ek
ck
1 X
P CEk
K
(4)
k refers to each dataset and i denotes to each model. The
intuition behind MPCE is simple: the expected error rate for a
single class across all the datasets. By considering the number
of classes, MPCE is more robust as a baseline criterion. A
paired T-test on PCE identifies if the differences of the MPCE
are significant across different models.
C. Results and Analysis
We select seven existing best methods2 that claim the stateof-the-art results and published within recent three years: time
series based on a bag-offeatures (TSBF), Elastic Ensemble
(PROP), 1-NN Bag-Of-SFA-Symbols (BOSS) in Vector Space
(BOSSVS), the Shapelet Ensemble (SE1) model, flat-COTE
(COTE) and multi-scale CNN (MCNN). Note that COTE is
an ensemble model which combines the weighted votes over
35 different classifiers. BOSSVS is an ensemble of multiple
BOSS models with different window length. 1NN-DTW is
also included as a simple standard baseline. The training and
deploying complexity of our models are small like 1NN-DTW
1 The
codes
are
available
at
https://github.com/cauchyturing/
UCR Time Series Classification Deep Learning Baseline [20].
2 ’Best’ means the overall performance is competitive and the model should
achieve the best performance on at least 4 datasets (10% of the all the 44
datasets).
TABLE I
T ESTING ERROR AND THE MEAN PER - CLASS ERROR (MPCE) ON 44 UCR TIME SERIES DATASET
Err Rate
DTW
COTE
MCNN
BOSSVS
PROP
BOSS
SE1
TSBF
MLP
FCN
ResNet
Adiac
Beef
CBF
ChlorineCon
CinCECGTorso
Coffee
CricketX
CricketY
CricketZ
DiatomSizeR
ECGFiveDays
FaceAll
FaceFour
FacesUCR
50words
fish
GunPoint
Haptics
InlineSkate
ItalyPower
Lightning2
Lightning7
MALLAT
MedicalImages
MoteStrain
NonInvThorax1
NonInvThorax2
OliveOil
OSULeaf
SonyAIBORobot
SonyAIBORobotII
StarLightCurves
SwedishLeaf
Symbols
SyntheticControl
Trace
TwoLeadECG
TwoPatterns
UWaveX
UWaveY
UWaveZ
wafer
WordSynonyms
yoga
0.396
0.367
0.003
0.352
0.349
0
0.246
0.256
0.246
0.033
0.232
0.192
0.17
0.095
0.31
0.177
0.093
0.623
0.616
0.05
0.131
0.274
0.066
0.263
0.165
0.21
0.135
0.167
0.409
0.275
0.169
0.093
0.208
0.05
0.007
0
0
0.096
0.272
0.366
0.342
0.02
0.351
0.164
0.233
0.133
0.001
0.314
0.064
0
0.154
0.167
0.128
0.082
0
0.105
0.091
0.057
0.191
0.029
0.007
0.488
0.551
0.036
0.164
0.247
0.036
0.258
0.085
0.093
0.073
0.1
0.145
0.146
0.076
0.031
0.046
0.046
0
0.01
0.015
0
0.196
0.267
0.265
0.001
0.266
0.113
0.231
0.367
0.002
0.203
0.058
0.036
0.182
0.154
0.142
0.023
0
0.235
0
0.063
0.19
0.051
0
0.53
0.618
0.03
0.164
0.219
0.057
0.26
0.079
0.064
0.06
0.133
0.271
0.23
0.07
0.023
0.066
0.049
0.003
0
0.001
0.002
0.18
0.268
0.232
0.002
0.276
0.112
0.302
0.267
0.001
0.345
0.13
0.036
0.346
0.328
0.313
0.036
0
0.241
0.034
0.103
0.367
0.017
0
0.584
0.573
0.086
0.262
0.288
0.064
0.474
0.115
0.169
0.118
0.133
0.074
0.265
0.188
0.096
0.141
0.029
0.04
0
0.015
0.001
0.27
0.364
0.336
0.001
0.439
0.169
0.353
0.367
0.002
0.36
0.062
0
0.203
0.156
0.156
0.059
0.178
0.152
0.091
0.063
0.18
0.034
0.007
0.584
0.567
0.039
0.115
0.233
0.05
0.245
0.114
0.178
0.112
0.133
0.194
0.293
0.124
0.079
0.085
0.049
0.01
0.01
0
0.067
0.199
0.283
0.29
0.003
0.226
0.121
0.22
0.2
0
0.34
0.125
0
0.259
0.208
0.246
0.046
0
0.21
0
0.042
0.301
0.011
0
0.536
0.511
0.053
0.148
0.342
0.058
0.288
0.073
0.161
0.101
0.1
0.012
0.321
0.098
0.021
0.072
0.032
0.03
0
0.004
0.016
0.241
0.313
0.312
0.001
0.345
0.081
0.373
0.133
0.01
0.312
0.021
0
0.297
0.326
0.277
0.069
0.055
0.247
0.034
0.079
0.288
0.057
0.06
0.607
0.653
0.053
0.098
0.274
0.092
0.305
0.113
0.174
0.118
0.133
0.273
0.238
0.066
0.093
0.12
0.083
0.033
0.05
0.029
0.048
0.248
0.322
0.346
0.002
0.357
0.159
0.245
0.287
0.009
0.336
0.262
0.004
0.278
0.259
0.263
0.126
0.183
0.234
0.051
0.09
0.209
0.08
0.011
0.488
0.603
0.096
0.257
0.262
0.037
0.269
0.135
0.138
0.13
0.09
0.329
0.175
0.196
0.022
0.075
0.034
0.008
0.02
0.001
0.046
0.164
0.249
0.217
0.004
0.302
0.149
0.248
0.167
0.14
0.128
0.158
0
0.431
0.405
0.408
0.036
0.03
0.115
0.17
0.185
0.288
0.126
0.067
0.539
0.649
0.034
0.279
0.356
0.064
0.271
0.131
0.058
0.057
0.60
0.43
0.273
0.161
0.043
0.107
0.147
0.05
0.18
0.147
0.114
0.232
0.297
0.295
0.004
0.406
0.145
0.143
0.25
0
0.157
0.187
0
0.185
0.208
0.187
0.07
0.015
0.071
0.068
0.052
0.321
0.029
0
0.449
0.589
0.03
0.197
0.137
0.02
0.208
0.05
0.039
0.045
0.167
0.012
0.032
0.038
0.033
0.034
0.038
0.01
0
0
0.103
0.246
0.275
0.271
0.003
0.42
0.155
0.174
0.233
0.006
0.172
0.229
0
0.179
0.195
0.187
0.069
0.045
0.166
0.068
0.042
0.273
0.011
0.007
0.495
0.635
0.04
0.246
0.164
0.021
0.228
0.105
0.052
0.049
0.133
0.021
0.015
0.038
0.029
0.042
0.128
0
0
0
0
0.213
0.332
0.245
0.003
0.368
0.142
Win
AVG Arithmetic ranking
AVG geometric ranking
MPCE
3
8.205
7.160
0.0397
8
3.682
3.054
0.0226
7
3.932
3.249
0.0241
5
7.318
5.997
0.0330
4
5.545
4.744
0.0304
13
4.614
3.388
0.0256
4
7.455
6.431
0.0302
4
6.614
5.598
0.0335
2
7.909
6.941
0.0407
18
3.977
2.780
0.0219
8
4.386
3.481
0.0231
as their pipeline is all from scratch without any heavy preprocessing and data augmentations, while our baselines do not
need feature crafting.
In Table I, we provide four metrics to fully evaluate different
approaches. FCN indicates the best performance on three
metrics at the first sight, while ResNet is also competitive
on the MPCE score and rankings.
In [9], [5], the authors proposed to validate the effectiveness
of their models by Wilcoxon signed-rank test on the error
rates. Instead, we choose the Wilcoxon rank-sum test as it can
deal with the tie conditions among the error rates with the
tie correction (Appenix Table II). The p-values in our case are
quite different with the results reported by [9]. Except for MLP
and DTW, all other approaches are ’linked’ together based on
the p-value. It possibly because the model pool we choose are
different and the ranking based statistics is very sensitive to
the model pool and its size.
The MPCE score is reported in the last row. FCN and
MLP have the best and worse MPCE score respectively. The
ResNet ranks 3rd among all the 11 models, just a little worse
than COTE. A paired T-test of mean on the PCE score is
performed to tell if the difference of MPCE is significant
(Appendix Table III). Interestingly, we found the difference
of MPCE among COTE, MCNN, BOSS, FCN and ResNet
are not significant. These five approaches are clustered in the
best group. Analogously, the rest approaches are grouped into
Fig. 2. Models grouping by the paired T-test of means on the normalized PCE scores.
two clusters based on the T-test results of the MPCE scores
(Figure 2).
In the best group, BOSS and COTE are all ensemble based
models. MCNN exploit convolutional networks but requires
heavy preprocessing in data transformation, downsampling and
window slicing. Our proposed FCN and ResNet are able to
classify time series from scratch and achieves the premium
performance. Compared to FCN, ResNet tends to overfit the
data much easier, but is still clustered in the first group without
significant difference to other four best models. We also note
that the proposed three-layer MLP achieves comparable results
to 1NN-DTW without significant difference. Recent advances
on ReLU and dropout work quite well in our experiments to
help the MLP gain the similar performance with the previous
baseline.
IV. L OCALIZE THE C ONTRIBUTING R EGIONS WITH C LASS
ACTIVATION M AP
Another benefit of FCN with the global average pooling
layer is its natural extension, the class activation map (CAM)
to interpret the class-specific region in the data [23].
For a given time series, let Sk (x) represent the activation of
filter k in the last convolutional layer at temporal location x.
For filter k, theP
output of the following global average pooling
layer is fk = x Sk (x). Let wkc indicate the weight of the
final softmax function for the output from filter k and the class
c, then the input of the final softmax function is
In Figure 3, we show two examples of the CAMs output
using the above approach. We can see that the discriminative
regions of the time series for the right classes are highlighted.
We also highlight the differences in the CAMs for the different
labels. The contributing regions for different categories are
different.
On the ’CBF’ dataset, label 0 is determined mostly by the
region where the sharp drop occurs. Sequences with label
1 have the signature pattern of a sharp rise followed by a
smoothly down trending. For label 2, the neural network is
address more attention on the long plateau occurs around the
middle. The similar analysis is also applied to the contributing
region on the ’StarLightCurve’ dataset. However, the label 0
and label 1 are quite similar in shapes, so the contributing
map of label 1 focus less on the smooth trends of drop down
while label 0 attract the uniform attention as the signal is much
smoother.
The CAM provides a natural way to find out the contributing
region in the raw data for the specific labels. This enables
classification-trained convolutional networks to learn to localize without any extra effort. Class activation maps also allow
us to visualize the predicted class scores on any given time
series, highlighting the discriminative subsequences detected
by the convolutional networks. CAM also provide a way to
find a possible explanation on how the convolutional networks
work for the setting of classification.
V. D ISCUSSION
gc
=
=
X
wkc
X
k
X
X
k
Sk (x)
x
wkc Sk (x)
x
We can define Mc as the class activation map for class c,
where each temporal element is given by
Mc =
X
wkc Sk (x)
k
Hence Mc (x, y) directly indicates the importance of the
activation at temporal location xi leading to the classification
of a sequence of time series to class c. If the output of the last
convolutional layer is not the same as the input, we can still
identify the contributing regions most relevant to the particular
category by simply upsampling the class activation map to the
length of the input time series.
A. Overfitting and Generalization
Neural networks is a strong universal approximator which
is known to overfit easily due to the large number of parameters. In our experiments, the overfitting was expected to be
significant since the UCR time series data is small and we
have no validation/test settings, only choose the model with
the lowest training loss for test.
However, our models generalize quite well given that the
training accuracy are almost all 100%. Dropout improves
the generalization capability of MLP by a large margin.
For the family of convolutional networks, batch normalization is known to help improve both the training speed and
generalization. Another important reason is we replace the
fully-connected layer by the global average pooling layer
before the softmax layer, which greatly reduces the amount of
parameters. Thus, starting with the basic network structures
without any data transformation and ensemble, our three
Label 0: 0.984
Label 1: 0.999
Label 2: 0.985
high
Label 0: 0.822
Label 1: 0.987
Label 2: 0.999
Low
Fig. 3. The class activation mapping (CAM) technique allows the classification-trained FCN to both classify the time series and localize class-specific
regions in a single forward-pass. The plots give examples of the contributing regions of the ground truth label in the raw data on the ’CBF’ (above) and
’StarLightCurve’ (below) dataset. The number indicates the likelihood of the corresponding label.
models provide very simple but strong baseline for time series
classification with the state-of-the-art performance.
Another nuance of our results is that, deep neural networks
work potentially quite well on small dataset as we expand their
generalization by recent advances in the network structures and
other technical tricks.
B. Feature Visualization and Analysis
We adopt the Gramian Angular Summation Field (GASF)
[21] to visualize the filters/weights in the neural networks.
Given a series X = {x1 , x2 , ..., xn }, we rescale X so that all
values fall in the interval [0, 1]
x̃i0 =
xi − min(X)
max(X) − min(X)
(5)
Then we can easily exploit the angular perspective by
considering the trigonometric summation between each point
to identify the correlation within different time intervals. The
GASF are defined as
cos(φi + φj )
p
0 p
= X̃ 0 · X̃ − I − X̃ 2 · I − X̃ 2
G =
(6)
(7)
I is the unit row vector√[1, 1, ..., 1].
p By defining the inner
2·
product
<
x,
y
>=
x
·
y
−
1
−
x
1 − y 2 and < x, y >=
p
√
2
2
1 − x · y − x · 1 − y ,GASF are actually quasi-Gramian
matrices [< x˜1 , x˜1 >].
We choose GASF because it provides an intuitive way to interpret the multi-scale correlation in 1-D space. G(i,j||i−j|=k)
encodes the cosine summation over the points with the striding
step k . The main diagonal Gi,i is the special case when k = 0
which contains the original values.
Figure 4 provides a visual demonstration of the filters in
three tested models. The weights from the second and the
last layer in MLP are very similar with clear structures and
very little degradation occurring. The weights in the first layer,
generally, have the higher values than the following layers.
The filters in FCN and ResNet are very similar. The
convolution extracts the local features in the temporal axis,
essentially like a weighted moving average that enhances
several receptive fields with the nonlinear transformations by
the ReLU. The sliding filters consider the dependencies among
different time intervals and frequencies. The filters learned
in the deeper layers are similar with their preceding layers.
This suggests the local patterns across multiple convolutional
layers are seemingly homogeneous. Both the visualization and
classification performance indicates the effectiveness of the 1D convolution.
C. Deep and Shallow
The exploration on the very deep architecture is interesting
and informative. The ResNet model has 11 layers but still
holds the premium performance. There are two factors that
impact the performance of the ResNet. With shortcut connections, the gradients can flow directly through the bottom
(a)MLP
(b)FCN
(C)ResNet
Fig. 4. Visualization of the filters learned in MLP, FCN and ResNet on the Adiac dataset. For ResNet, the three visualized filters are from the first, second
and third convolution layers in each residual blocks.
layers in the ResNet, which largely improve the interpretability
of the model to learn some highly complex patterns in the
data. Meanwhile, the much deeper models tend to overfit
much easier, requiring more effort in regularizing the model
to improve its generalization ability.
In our experiments, the batch normalization and global
average pooling have largely improved the performance in
test data but still tend to overfit, as the patterns in the UCR
dataset are comparably not so complex to catch. As a result,
the test performance of the ResNet is not as good as FCN.
When the data is larger and more complex, we encourage the
exploration of the ResNet structure since it is more likely to
find a good trade-off between the strong interpretability and
generalization.
D. Classification Semantics
The benchmark approaches for time series classification
could be categorized into three groups: distance based, feature
based and neural neural network based. The combination of
distance and feature based approaches are also commonly
explored to improve the performance. We are curious about
the classification behavior of different models as if they all
perform similarly on the same dataset, or their feature space
and learned classifier are diverged.
The semantics of different models are evaluated based on
their PCE scores. We choose PCA to reduce the dimension
because this simple linear transformation is able to preserves
large pairwise distances. In Figure 5, the distance between
three baseline models with other benchmarks are comparatively large. which indicates the feature and classification
criterion learned in our models are good complement to other
models.
It is natural to see that FCN and ResNet are quite close with
each other. The embedding of MLP is isolated into a single
category, meaning its classification behavior is quite different
with other approaches. This inspires us that a synthesis of the
feature learned by MLP and convolutional networks through
a deep-and-wide model [22] might also improve the performance.
VI. C ONCLUSIONS
We provide a simple and strong baseline for time series
classification from scratch with deep neural networks. Our
proposed baseline models are pure end-to-end without any
Fig. 5. The PCE distribution of different approaches after dimension reduction through PCA.
heavy preprocessing on the raw data or feature crafting. The
FCN achieves premium performance to other state-of-theart approaches. Our exploration on the much deeper neural
networks with the ResNet structure also gets competitive
performance under the same experiment settings. The global
average pooling in our convolutional model enables the exploitation of the Class Activation Map (CAM) to find out the
contributing region in the raw data for the specific labels. A
simple MLP is found to be identical to the 1NN-DTW as
the previous golden baseline. An overall analysis is provided
to discuss the generalization of our models, learned features,
network structures and the classification semantics. Rather
than ranking based criterion, MPCE is proposed as an unbiased
measurement to evaluate the performance of multiple models
on multiple datasets. Many research focus on time series
classification and recent effort is more and more lying on the
deep learning approach for the related tasks. Our baseline, with
simple protocol and small complexity for building and deploying, provides a default choice for the real world application
and a good starting point for the future research.
R EFERENCES
[1] E. Keogh and C. A. Ratanamahatana, “Exact indexing of dynamic time
warping,” Knowledge and information systems, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 358–
386, 2005.
[2] J. Lin, E. Keogh, L. Wei, and S. Lonardi, “Experiencing sax: a novel
symbolic representation of time series,” Data Mining and knowledge
discovery, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 107–144, 2007.
TABLE II
A PPENDIX : T HE P - VALUES OF W ILCOXON RANK - SUM TEST BETWEEN
OUR BASELINE MODELS WITH OTHER APPROACHES .
DTW
COTE
MCNN
BOSSVS
PROP
BOSS
SE1
TSBF
MLP
FCN
ResNet
MLP
FCN
ResNet
0.7575
0.0040
0.0049
0.1385
0.0616
0.0076
0.1299
0.1634
/
0.0051
0.0049
0.0203
0.8445
0.9834
0.1660
0.2529
0.8905
0.0604
0.0715
0.0051
/
0.9169
0.0245
0.8347
0.9468
0.1887
0.2360
0.8740
0.0576
0.0811
0.0049
0.9169
/
[3] M. G. Baydogan, G. Runger, and E. Tuv, “A bag-of-features framework
to classify time series,” IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and
machine intelligence, vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 2796–2802, 2013.
[4] P. Schäfer, “The boss is concerned with time series classification in the
presence of noise,” Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, vol. 29,
no. 6, pp. 1505–1530, 2015.
[5] P. Schafer, “Scalable time series classification,” Data Mining and
Knowledge Discovery, pp. 1–26, 2015.
[6] J. Lines and A. Bagnall, “Time series classification with ensembles
of elastic distance measures,” Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery,
vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 565–592, 2015.
[7] A. Bagnall, J. Lines, J. Hills, and A. Bostrom, “Time-series classification
with cote: the collective of transformation-based ensembles,” IEEE
Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 27, no. 9, pp.
2522–2535, 2015.
[8] Y. Zheng, Q. Liu, E. Chen, Y. Ge, and J. L. Zhao, “Exploiting multichannels deep convolutional neural networks for multivariate time series
TABLE III
A PPENDIX : T HE P - VALUES OF THE PAIRED T- TEST OF THE MEANS FOR THE MPCE SCORE ON 11 BENCHMARK MODELS .
DTW
DTW
COTE
MCNN
BOSSVS
PROP
BOSS
SE1
TSBF
MLP
FCN
ResNet
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
COTE
MCNN
BOSSVS
PROP
BOSS
SE1
TSBF
MLP
FCN
ResNet
2.056E-05
5.699E-05
2.287E-01
5.141E-02
3.721E-05
3.652E-04
4.832E-05
5.911E-03
1.354E-02
2.140E-01
2.760E-04
1.033E-01
2.497E-01
6.404E-04
3.739E-02
3.040E-03
1.208E-04
3.634E-03
1.763E-01
4.654E-01
2.871E-02
1.311E-02
3.528E-04
3.360E-03
4.335E-01
1.440E-01
1.759E-02
1.770E-01
4.234E-01
5.240E-05
8.023E-05
4.628E-02
2.061E-02
1.049E-03
9.901E-03
7.088E-02
1.451E-04
3.978E-01
2.495E-01
2.983E-03
2.673E-02
1.879E-01
1.208E-02
1.510E-03
6.832E-05
3.427E-04
4.351E-01
3.757E-01
5.067E-03
4.241E-02
2.751E-01
3.251E-02
1.640E-03
3.045E-04
2.508E-01
classification,” Frontiers of Computer Science, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 96–
112, 2016.
Z. Cui, W. Chen, and Y. Chen, “Multi-scale convolutional neural networks for time series classification,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.06995,
2016.
Y. Chen, E. Keogh, B. Hu, N. Begum, A. Bagnall, A. Mueen, and
G. Batista, “The ucr time series classification archive (2015),” 2016.
N. Srivastava, G. E. Hinton, A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and
R. Salakhutdinov, “Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks
from overfitting.” Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 15, no. 1,
pp. 1929–1958, 2014.
V. Nair and G. E. Hinton, “Rectified linear units improve restricted boltzmann machines,” in Proceedings of the 27th International Conference
on Machine Learning (ICML-10), 2010, pp. 807–814.
B. Xu, N. Wang, T. Chen, and M. Li, “Empirical evaluation of rectified
activations in convolutional network,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1505.00853,
2015.
J. Long, E. Shelhamer, and T. Darrell, “Fully convolutional networks
for semantic segmentation,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2015, pp. 3431–3440.
S. Ioffe and C. Szegedy, “Batch normalization: Accelerating deep
network training by reducing internal covariate shift,” arXiv preprint
arXiv:1502.03167, 2015.
K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun, “Deep residual learning for image
recognition,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1512.03385, 2015.
M. Lin, Q. Chen, and S. Yan, “Network in network,” arXiv preprint
arXiv:1312.4400, 2013.
M. D. Zeiler, “Adadelta: an adaptive learning rate method,” arXiv
preprint arXiv:1212.5701, 2012.
D. Kingma and J. Ba, “Adam: A method for stochastic optimization,”
arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014.
F. Chollet, “Keras,” https://github.com/fchollet/keras, 2015.
Z. Wang and T. Oates, “Imaging time-series to improve classification
and imputation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.00327, 2015.
H.-T. Cheng, L. Koc, J. Harmsen, T. Shaked, T. Chandra, H. Aradhye,
G. Anderson, G. Corrado, W. Chai, M. Ispir et al., “Wide & deep
learning for recommender systems,” in Proceedings of the 1st Workshop
on Deep Learning for Recommender Systems. ACM, 2016, pp. 7–10.
B. Zhou, A. Khosla, A. Lapedriza, A. Oliva, and A. Torralba,
“Learning deep features for discriminative localization,” arXiv preprint
arXiv:1512.04150, 2015.
| 9cs.NE
|
Past, Present, Future: A Computational Investigation of the Typology of
Tense in 1000 Languages
Ehsaneddin Asgari1,2 and Hinrich Schütze1
1
2
Center for Information and Language Processing, LMU Munich, Germany
Applied Science and Technology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA,
[email protected]
arXiv:1704.08914v2 [cs.CL] 14 Sep 2017
Abstract
We present SuperPivot, an analysis
method for low-resource languages that
occur in a superparallel corpus, i.e., in a
corpus that contains an order of magnitude more languages than parallel corpora
currently in use. We show that SuperPivot
performs well for the crosslingual analysis
of the linguistic phenomenon of tense.
We produce analysis results for more than
1000 languages, conducting – to the best
of our knowledge – the largest crosslingual computational study performed to
date. We extend existing methodology for
leveraging parallel corpora for typological
analysis by overcoming a limiting assumption of earlier work: We only require
that a linguistic feature is overtly marked
in a few of thousands of languages as
opposed to requiring that it be marked in
all languages under investigation.
1
Introduction
Significant linguistic resources such as machinereadable lexicons and part-of-speech (POS) taggers are available for at most a few hundred languages. This means that the majority of the
languages of the world are low-resource. Lowresource languages like Fulani are spoken by tens
of millions of people and are politically and economically important; e.g., to manage a sudden
refugee crisis, NLP tools would be of great benefit. Even “small” languages are important for
the preservation of the common heritage of humankind that includes natural remedies and linguistic and cultural diversity that can potentially
enrich everybody. Thus, developing analysis
methods for low-resource languages is one of the
most important challenges of NLP today.
We address this challenge by proposing a new
method for analyzing what we call superparallel
corpora, corpora that are by an order of magnitude
more parallel than corpora that have been available
in NLP to date. The corpus we work with in this
paper is the Parallel Bible Corpus (PBC) that consists of translations of the New Testament in 1169
languages. Given that no NLP analysis tools are
available for most of these 1169 languages, how
can we extract the rich information that is potentially hidden in such superparallel corpora?
The method we propose is based on two hypotheses. H1 Existence of overt encoding. For
any important linguistic distinction f that is frequently encoded across languages in the world,
there are a few languages that encode f overtly
on the surface. H2 Overt-to-overt and overt-tonon-overt projection. For a language l that encodes f , a projection of f from the “overt languages” to l in the superparallel corpus will identify the encoding that l uses for f , both in cases
in which the encoding that l uses is overt and in
cases in which the encoding that l uses is nonovert. Based on these two hypotheses, our method
proceeds in 5 steps.
1. Selection of a linguistic feature. We select a
linguistic feature f of interest. Running example:
We select past tense as feature f .
2. Heuristic search for head pivot. Through
a heuristic search, we find a language lh that contains a head pivot ph that is highly correlated with
the linguistic feature of interest.
Running example: ”ti” in Seychelles Creole
(CRS). CRS “ti” meets our requirements for a
head pivot well as will be verified empirically in
§3. First, ”ti” is a surface marker: it is easily
identifable through whitespace tokenization and it
is not ambiguous, e.g., it does not have a second
meaning apart from being a grammatical marker.
Second, ”ti” is a good marker for past tense in
terms of both “precision” and “recall”. CRS has
mandatory past tense marking (as opposed to languages in which tense marking is facultative) and
”ti” is highly correlated with the general notion of
past tense.
This does not mean that every clause that a linguist would regard as past tense is marked with
”ti” in CRS. For example, some tense-aspect configurations that are similar to English present perfect are marked with ”in” in CRS, not with ”ti”
(e.g., ENG “has commanded” is translated as “in
ordonn”).
Our goal is not to find a head language and a
head pivot that is a perfect marker of f . Such a
head pivot probably does not exist; or, more precisely, linguistic features are not completely rigorously defined. In a sense, one of the significant
contributions of this work is that we provide more
rigorous definitions of past tense across languages;
e.g., ”ti” in CRS is one such rigorous definition
of past tense and it automatically extends (through
projection) to 1000 languages in the superparallel
corpus.
3. Projection of head pivot to larger pivot
set. Based on an alignment of the head language
to the other languages in the superparallel corpus,
we project the head pivot to all other languages
and search for highly correlated surface markers,
i.e., we search for additional pivots in other languages. This projection to more pivots achieves
three goals. First, it makes the method more robust. Relying on a single pivot would result in
many errors due to the inherent noisiness of linguistic data and because several components we
use (e.g., alignment of the languages in the superparallel corpus) are imperfect. Second, as we
discussed above, the head pivot does not necessarily have high “recall”; our example was that
CRS “ti” is not applied to certain clauses that
would be translated using present perfect in English. Thus, moving to a larger pivot set increases
recall. Third, as we will see below, the pivot set
can be leveraged to create a fine-grained map of
the linguistic feature. Consider clauses referring
to eventualities in the past that English speakers
would render in past progressive, present perfect
and simple past tense. Our hope is that the pivot
set will cover these distinctions, i.e., one of the
pivots marks past progressive, but not present prefect and simple past, another pivot marks present
perfect, but not the other two and so on. It is
beyond the scope of this paper to verify that we
can produce such an analysis for all linguistic features, but a promising example of this type of map,
including distinctions like progressive and perfective aspect, is given in §4.
Running example: We compute the correlation
of “ti” with words in other languages and select the
100 highest correlated words as pivots. Examples
of pivots we find this way are Torres Strait Creole “bin” (from English “been”) and Tzotzil “laj”.
“laj” is a perfective marker, e.g., “Laj meltzaj -uk”
‘LAJ be-made subj’ means “It’s done being built”
(Aissen, 1987).
4. Projection of pivot set to all languages.
Now that we have a large pivot set, we project the
pivots to all other languages to search for linguistic devices that express the linguistic feature f . Up
to this point, we have made the assumption that it
is easy to segment text in all languages into pieces
of a size that is not too small (individual characters of the Latin alphabet would be too small) and
not too large (entire sentences as tokens would be
too large). Segmentation on standard delimiters
is a good approximation for the majority of languages – but not for all: it undersegments some
(e.g., the polysynthetic language Inuit) and oversegments others (e.g., languages that use punctuation marks as regular characters).
For this reason, we do not employ tokenization
in this step. Rather we search for character ngrams (2 ≤ n ≤ 6) to find linguistic devices that
express f . This implementation of the search procedure is a limitation – there are many linguistic
devices that cannot be found using it, e.g., templates in templatic morphology. We leave addressing this for future work (§7).
Running example: We find “-ed” for English
and “-te” for German as surface features that are
highly correlated with the 100 past tense pivots.
5. Linguistic analysis. The result of the previous steps is a superparallel corpus that is richly annotated with information about linguistic feature
f . This structure can be exploited for the analysis
of a single language li that may be the focus of
a linguistic investigation. Starting with the character n-grams that were found in the step “projection of pivot set to all languages”, we can explore
their use and function, e.g, for the mined n-gram
“-ed” in English (assuming English is the language
li and it is unfamiliar to us). Many of the other
1000 languages provide annotations of linguistic
feature f for li : both the languages that are part of
the pivot set (e.g., Tzotzil “laj”) and the mined ngrams in other languages that we may have some
knowledge of (e.g., “-te” in German).
We can also use the structure we have generated for typological analysis across languages
following the work of Michael Cysouw. He
has pioneered a new methodology for typology
((Cysouw, 2014), §5). We do not contribute any
innovations to typology in this paper, but our
method is a significant advancement computationally over Cysouw’s work because we overcome
many of his limiting assumptions. Most importantly, our method scales to thousands of languages as we demonstrate below whereas Cysouw
worked on a few dozen.
Running example: We sketch the type of analysis that our new method makes possible in §4.
The above steps “1. heuristic search for head
pivot” and “2. projection of head pivot to larger
pivot set” are based on H1: we assume the existence of overt coding in a subset of languages.
The above steps “2. projection of head pivot to
larger pivot set” and “3. projection of pivot set
to all languages” are based on H2: we assume
that overt-to-overt and overt-to-non-overt projection is possible.
In the rest of the paper, we will refer to the
method that consists of steps 1 to 5 as SuperPivot:
“linguistic analysis of SUPERparallel corpora using surface PIVOTs”.
We make three contributions. (i) Our basic hypotheses are H1 and H2. (H1) For an important
linguistic feature, there exist a few languages that
mark it overtly and easily recognizably. (H2) It
is possible to project overt markers to overt and
non-overt markers in other languages. Based on
these two hypotheses we design SuperPivot, a new
method for analyzing highly parallel corpora, and
show that it performs well for the crosslingual
analysis of the linguistic phenomenon of tense.
(ii) Given a superparallel corpus, SuperPivot can
be used for the analysis of any low-resource language represented in that corpus. In the supplementary material, we present results of our analysis for three tenses (past, present, future) for 11631
languages. An evaluation of accuracy is presented
in Table 3.2. (iii) We extend Michael Cysouw’s pioneering work on typological analysis using paral-
1. Selection of a linguistic feature. The linguistic
feature of interest f is selected by the person who
performs a SuperPivot analysis, i.e., by a linguist,
NLP researcher or data scientist. Henceforth, we
will refer to this person as the linguist.
In this paper, f ∈ F = {past, present, future}.
2. Heuristic search for head pivot. There are
several ways for finding the head language and the
head pivot. Perhaps the linguist knows a language
that has a good head pivot. Or she is a trained typologist and can find the head pivot by consulting
the typological literature.
In this paper, we use our knowledge of English
and an alignment from English to all other languages to find head pivots. (See below for details
on alignment.) We define a “query” in English
and search for words that are highly correlated to
the query in other languages. For future tense, the
query is simply the word “will”, so we search for
words in other languages that are highly correlated
with “will”. For present tense, the query is the
union of “is”, “are” and “am”. So we search for
words in other languages that are highly correlated
with the “merger” of these three words. For past
tense, we POS tag the English part of PBC and
merge all words tagged as past tense into one past
tense word.2 We then search for words in other
languages that are highly correlated with this artificial past tense word.
As an additional constraint, we do not select the
most highly correlated word as the head pivot, but
the most highly correlated word in a Creole language. Our rationale is that Creole languages are
more regular than other languages because they
are young and have not accumulated “historical
baggage” that may make computational analysis
more difficult.
Table 1 lists the three head pivots for F .
3. Projection of head pivot to larger pivot set.
We first use fast align (Dyer et al., 2013) to align
1
We exclude six of the 1169 languages because they do
not share enough verses with the rest.
2
Past tense is defined as tags BED, BED*, BEDZ,
BEDZ*, DOD*, VBD, DOD. We use NLTK (Bird, 2006).
lel corpora by overcoming several limiting factors.
The most important is that Cysouw’s method is
only applicable if markers of the relevant linguistic
feature are recognizable on the surface in all languages. In contrast, we only assume that markers
of the relevant linguistic feature are recognizable
on the surface in a small number of languages.
2
SuperPivot: Description of method
the head language to all other languages in the corpus. This alignment is on the word level.
We compute a score for each word in each language based on the number of times it is aligned
to the head pivot, the number of times it is aligned
to another word and the total frequencies of head
pivot and word. We use χ2 (Casella and Berger,
2008) as the score throughout this paper. Finally,
we select the k words as pivots that have the highest association score with the head pivot.
We impose the constraint that we only select
one pivot per language. So as we go down the
list, we skip pivots from languages for which we
already have found a pivot. We set k = 100 in this
paper. Table 1 gives the top 10 pivots.
4. Projection of pivot set to all languages.
As discussed above, the process so far has been
based on tokenization. To be able to find markers
that cannot be easily detected on the surface (like
“-ed” in English), we identify non-tokenizationbased character n-gram features in step 4.
The immediate challenge is that without tokens,
we have no alignment between the languages anymore. We could simply assume that the occurrence of a pivot has scope over the entire verse.
But this is clearly inadequate, e.g., for the sentence “I arrived yesterday, I’m staying today, and
I will leave tomorrow”, it is incorrect to say that
it is marked as past tense (or future tense) in its
entirety. Fortunately, the verses in the New Testament mostly have a simple structure that limits the
variation in where a particular piece of content occurs in the verse. We therefore make the assumption that a particular relative position in language
l1 (e.g., the character at relative position 0.62) is
aligned with the same relative position in l2 (i.e.,
the character at relative position 0.62). This is
likely to work for a simple example like “I arrived
yesterday, I’m staying today, and I will leave tomorrow” across languages.
In our analysis of errors, we found many cases
where this assumption breaks down. A wellknown problematic phenomenon for our method
is the difference between, say, VSO and SOV languages: the first class puts the verb at the beginning, the second at the end. However, keep in
mind that we accumulate evidence over k = 100
pivots and then compute aggregate statistics over
the entire corpus. As our evaluation below shows,
the “linear alignment” assumption does not seem
to do much harm given the general robustness of
our method.
One design element that increases robustness is
that we find the two positions in each verse that are
most highly (resp. least highly) correlated with the
linguistic feature f . Specifically, we compute the
relative position x of each pivot that occurs in the
verse and apply a Gaussian filter (σ = 6 where the
unit of length is the character), i.e., we set p(x) ≈
0.066 (0.066 is the density of a Gaussian with σ =
6 at x = 0) and center a bell curve around x. The
total score for a position x is then the sum of the
filter values at x summed over all occurring pivots.
Finally, we select the positions xmin and xmax with
lowest and highest values for each verse.
χ2 is then computed based on the number of
times a character n-gram occurs in a window of
size w around xmax (positive count) and in a window of size w around xmin (negative count). Verses
in which no pivot occurs are used for the negative
count in their entirety. The top-ranked character ngrams are then output for analysis by the linguist.
We set w = 20.
5. Linguistic analysis. We now have created a
structure that contains rich information about the
linguistic feature: for each verse we have relative
positions of pivots that can be projected across languages. We also have maximum positions within
a verse that allow us to pinpoint the most likely
place in the vicinity of which linguistic feature f
is marked in all languages. This structure can be
used for the analysis of individual low-resource
languages as well as for typological analysis. We
will give an example of such an analysis in §4.
6. Hierarchical clusterings of markers and
languages. As an additional evaluation, we
worked on hierarchical clusterings of past, present
and future pivots. As detailed in §2.4, we represent each verse by a vector of length 100 showing which pivot markers are used to express this
verse. The other way of looking at these data is
that for each marker we have an occurrence distribution over verses and we may exploit these
data to demonstrate the distance between markers. For the purpose of comparing two markers,
we propose calculation of the Jensen-Shannon divergence between the normalized occurrence distribution over verses:
Dmpi ,mpj = JSD(mˆpi , mˆpj ),
where mˆpi and mˆpi , are the normalized occurrence distributions over verses. We compare the
obtained distance between markers with genetic
distance of their corresponding languages using
WALS information (Dryer et al., 2005). For visualization purposes, we perform Unweighted Pair
Group Method with Arithmetic Mean (UPGMA)
hierarchical clustering on the pairwise distance
matrix of the marker for each tense separately
(Johnson, 1967).
In addition to clustering of pivot markers for
each tense separately, we performed the same
comparison for all top markers of 1107 languages3
and take the average distances of languages in
past, present, and future marking. This allows
us to compare the average tense behavior of languages.
1
Dli ,lj = (JSDpast +JSDpresent +JSDf uture ),
3
3
Data, experiments and results
3.1
Data
We use a New Testament subset of the Parallel
Bible Corpus (PBS) (Mayer and Cysouw, 2014)
that consists of 1556 translations of the the Bible
in 1169 unique languages. We consider two languages to be different if they have different ISO
639-3 codes.
The translations are aligned on the verse level.
However, many translations do not have complete
coverage, so that most verses are not present in at
least one translation. One reason for this is that
sometimes several consecutive verses are merged,
so that one verse contains material that is in reality not part of it and the merged verses may then
be missing from the translation. Thus, there is a
trade-off between number of parallel translations
and number of verses they have in common. Although some preprocessing was done by the authors of the resource, many translations are not
preprocessed. For example, Japanese is not tokenized. We also observed some incorrectness and
sparseness in the metadata. One example is that
one Fijian translation (see §4) is tagged fij hindi,
but it is Fijian, not Fiji Hindi.
We use the 7958 verses with the best coverage
across languages.
3.2
Experiments
1. Selection of a linguistic feature. We conduct
three experiments for the linguistic features past
tense, present tense and future tense.
3
We exclude languages that have fewer than 7000 verses
in common with the pivot language to ensure quality of
marker.
2. Heuristic search for head pivot. We use the
queries described in §2 for finding the following
three head pivots. (i) Past tense head pivot: “ti”
in Seychellois Creole (CRS) (McWhorter, 2005).
(ii) Present tense head pivot: “ta” in Papiamentu
(PAP) (Andersen, 1990). (iii) Future tense head
pivot: “bai” in Tok Pisin (TPI) (Traugott, 1978;
Sankoff, 1990).
3. Projection of head pivot to larger pivot set.
Using the method described in §2, we project each
head pivot to a set of k = 100 pivots. Table 1 gives
the top 10 pivots for each tense.
4. Projection of pivot set to all languages. Using the method described in §2, we compute highly
correlated character n-gram features, 2 ≤ n ≤ 6,
for all 1163 languages.
See §4 for the last step of SuperPivot: 5. Linguistic analysis.
3.3
Evaluation
We rank n-gram features and retain the top 10, for
each linguistic feature, for each language and for
each n-gram size. We process 1556 translations.
Thus, in total, we extract 1556 × 5 × 10 n-grams.
Table 3.2 shows Mean Reciprocal Rank (MRR)
for 10 languages. The rank for a particular ranking of n-grams is the first n-gram that is highly
correlated with the relevant tense; e.g., character
subsequences of the name “Paulus” are evaluated
as incorrect, the subsequence “-ed” in English as
correct for past. MRR is averaged over all n-gram
sizes, 2 ≤ n ≤ 6. Chinese has consistent tense
marking only for future, so results are poor. Russian and Polish perform poorly because their central grammatical category is aspect, not tense. The
poor performance on Arabic is due to the limits
of character n-gram features for a “templatic” language.
During this evaluation, we noticed a surprising
amount of variation within translations of one language; e.g., top-ranked n-grams for some German
translations include names like “Paulus”. We suspect that for literal translations, linear alignment
(§2) yields good n-grams. But many translations
are free, e.g., they change the sequence of clauses.
This deteriorates mined n-grams. See §7.
Hierarchical clusterings of markers. Hierarchical clusterings of past, present and future pivots
using JSD between the normalized occurrence distribution over verses are shown in Figure 1, Figure 2, and Figure 3 for past, present, and future
head pivots
past
code language
pivot
CRS Seychelles C.
ti
GUX Gourmanchéma den
MAW Mampruli
daa
GFK Patpatar
ga
YAL Yalunka
yi
TOH Gitonga
di
DGI Northern Dagara tι
BUM Bulu (Cameroon) nga
TCS Torres Strait C. bin
NDZ Ndogo
giὶ
present
code language
pivot
PAP Papiamentu
ta
NOB Norwegian Bokmål er
HIF Fiji Hindi
hei
AFR Afrikaans
is
DAN Danish
er
SWE Swedish
är
EPO Esperanto
estas
ELL Greek
ίναι
HIN Hindi
haai
NAQ Khoekhoe
ra
future
code language
pivot
TPI Tok Pisin
bai
LID Nyindrou
kameh
GUL Sea Island C. gwine
TGP Tangoa
pa
BUK Bugawac
oc
BIS Bislama
bambae
PIS Pijin
bae
APE Bukiyip
eke
HWC Hawaiian C. goin
NHR Nharo
gha
Table 1: Top ten past, present, and future tense pivots extracted from 1163 languages. C. = Creole
language
Arabic
Chinese
English
French
German
Italian
Persian
Polish
Russian
Spanish
all
past
1.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.77
1.00
0.90
1.00
0.88
present
0.39
0.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.50
1.00
0.79
future
0.77
0.87
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.58
0.62
1.00
0.88
all
0.72
0.29
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.92
0.86
0.67
1.00
0.85
Table 2: MRR results for step 4. See text for details.
tenses respectively. In addition to markers clusterings, the average tense behavior clustering of
1107 languages is depicted in Figure 4. In these
figures languages are colored based on their language families using WALS (Dryer et al., 2005),
languages without family information on WALS
are uncolored. We observed that most of pivot past
and future markers belong to Niger Congo family and present markers are mostly within IndoEuropean family. It can be seen that in many
cases languages with the same family behave accordingly in tense marking. For instance, in past
tense marking Oto-Manguean languages use almost the same marker of ni with small writing
variations (Figure 1). Although Tezoatlán Mixtec
did not have a record on WALS, since its marker
is the same as other Oto-Manguean languages and
works almost identical to ni in Oto-Manguean languages, we may guess this language is also OtoManguean, which turned out to be true when we
performed further searches.4 There were many of
such cases for which we could guess the family of
language based on their tense marking similarities
in Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3.
We use normalized JSD (0 ≤ JSD ≤ 1)
4
https://www.ethnologue.com/language/mxb
for comparison of each pair of languages/markers;
this allows us to investigate whether a simple
threshold of 0.5 accurately predicts whether two
languages are genetically related or not. The results are summarized in Table 3.3. Although the
average tense marking divergence has a low recall, it expresses a high precision of 0.36, where
1
the random chance is 103
≈ 0.01. Thus, it means
that if divergence of tense marking is low the languages are very likely to be genetically related.
This conclusion is supported by Figure 4 where
many small clusters of nodes have the same color.
This suggests that our method may help in completion of WALS.
4
A map of past tense
To illustrate the potential of our method we select
five out of the 100 past tense pivots that give rise
to large clusters of distinct combinations. Starting
with CRS, we find other pivots that “split” the set
of verses that contain the CRS past tense pivot “ti”
into two parts that have about the same size. This
gives us two sets. We now look for a pivot that
splits one of these two sets about evenly and so
on. After iterating four times, we arrive at five pivots: CRS “ti”, Fijian (FIJ) “qai”, Hawaiian Creole
(HWC) “wen”, Torres Strait Creole (TCS) “bin”
and Tzotzil (TZO) “laj”.
Figure 5 shows a t-SNE (Maaten and Hinton,
2008) visualization of the large clusters of combinations that are found for these five languages,
including one cluster of verses that do not contain
any of the five pivots.
This figure is a map of past tense for all 1163
languages, not just for CRS, FIJ, HWC, TCS and
TZO: once the interpretation of a particular cluster has been established based on CRS, FIJ, HWC,
TCS and TZO, we can investigate this cluster in
the 1164 other languages by looking at the verses
accuracy
precision
recall
TNR
avg tense
696
( 1107
lang. - 103 fam.)
0.93
0.36
0.01
0.99
past
55
( 100
lang. - 15 fam.)
0.55
0.18
0.59
0.55
present
70
( 100
lang. - 17 fam.)
0.81
0.75
0.37
0.96
Arawakan
Oto-Manguean
future
44Mayan
( 100
lang. - 16 fam.)
Niger-Congo
0.58unknown
0.16Indo-European
Khoe-Kwadi
0.61Mande
0.58Tupian
Algic
Austronesian
Table 3: Language family similarity prediction results based on coordinated marking
of verses. Only
Guaicuruan
Misumalpan
languages with records on WALS are included in this evaluation. TNR: true negative
rate.
Eastern Sudanic
ne
>
e
i
ge cu > k > ya > s
a
a
en > n
N uer eha w a am okw
N N awa al S a > io > te
D n tr a m g o a )
Ce any nai > gand
K w a k a o (U y a
N ng a >
ala
La ang g > k
Kw unga > qai ogi
ën
T ian
>
>h
Fij onquin ccan
a
Alg aram ka
S
>
ri
o
i
M a ba > s
kon
Yoru > ka
in >
io
Kwa rian Pidg
Nige we
>
Igbo í > so
Mocov > oko
Kumam ga
>
i³
Madak
zatec > qu
Huautla Ma
Kuranko > ya
Urdu > ﻧﮯ
Hindi > ne
Chol > tsi
Tzotzil > laj
Lacandon > caj
Sirionó > que
Kriol > bin
Konni >
die
Tezoat
lá
Atatlá n Mixtec >
ni
Yoso huca Mixte
n
c > ni
d
úa
Peño
les M Mixtec >
ni
San
ixtec
> ní
Oco Miguel
So tepec El Gra
nde
Mix
A uthe
Mixte
tec
Ch frikaan rn Pue
> nī
c>
ava
bla
ni
s>
Mix
het
N a can
tec
o
m
>y
>n
Bu a (
a
ì
N
lu
a
To
m
(C
Ma rres ame ibia)
G m p S tra ro o > g e
S our ruli it Cr n) > n
e
P es m a >
g
Ya atp elw nch daa ole > a
a a
é
l
bin
N
u
W o n ta r C r m a
C es rthe ka > > g eole > d
h u te r
a
e
F
y
n
n
j > rn
re
D i
nc
ix K a a g
h>
nj ar
ob a
ti
al > t
ɩ
>
jix
Eskimo-Aleut
ax
m a
l> k
ya
'a >
>
ob e
da
nj ra'a e
Di
'a a
Q Kw > v ué ú e
m d
o
l
Ixi cob a > li >
Yo aka h Fa
n
M u t > to > fu
So opi lma i
d
Ch am pu a >
g
T on
nọ ehm
Git Ika > k > k
ju
ma
E ka em > w
Kas uri > ra a
Tup u > nax
Sus > giì
yaa
go
Ndo hana) > i > bi
(G
m
Buli taro Oto > bi
bi
Queré ital Otomi
tomi >
Mezqu de México O
Estado dgin > wen
Pi
i'i
wa
Ha
beè
Gokana >
Naro > kò
Tzeltal > la
North Alaskan Inupiatun > tavra
fC
o
ng
o)
>
ma
Tikar > ɓe
Ozumacín Chinantec > maˊ
Tektiteko > tuq
Mazatlán Mix
e > najty
Dyula > tun
Ba
mb
Luo (K ara > tun
en
Moris ya and Tanz
yen >
ania) >
S
ti
ne
o
u
th
Mob ern Bobo
M ada
Ba a > din
ré >
m ane
Fare fut > lɛ
fa
Krio re > d
Ja > bin aa
Na maic
a
w
S ra d m n C re
Sa nan > da ole En
in
T
glis
M Hait t Lu ong
h>
did
M aya ian cian o > b
n
C
a
M y a g n a re o C re e n
ole
> le
M on ng
F re
B o a n o (D n a > d a i > te
nc
g
h>
K kob se em dai
té
G on a ng oc
ar ko ru > > m ratic
if u m
Re
na ba ben a
pu
> > le
bli
áb
co
a
ne
>
e
i
ge cu > k > ya > s
a
a
en > n
N uer eha w a am okw
N N awa al S a > io > te
D ntr am go a)
Ce any nai > gand
w
a
K ak o (U ya
N ng a >
ala
a
g
L an g > k
Kw unga > qai ogi
ën
T ian
>
>h
Fij onquin ccan
a
Alg aram ka
S
>
ori
Ma ba > si
ru
kon
Yo o > ka
in >
Kwai ian Pidg
Niger we
>
Igbo
ví > so
Moco > oko
Kumam ga
>
Madak
atec > qui³
Huautla Maz
Kuranko > ya
Urdu > ﻧﮯ
Hindi > ne
Chol > tsi
Tzotzil > laj
Lacandon > caj
Sirionó > que
Kriol > bin
Konni >
die
Tezoatlán
Mixtec
Atatláh
> ni
Yoso uca Mixte
Peño ndúa Mixt c > ni
ec >
le
ni
San s Mixte
c > ní
M
Oco iguel
Sou tepec El Gra
nde
Mix
the
A
Mixte
tec
Ch frikaan rn Pue
> nī
c>
av
bla
ni
s
Mix
N a acan > het
te
c>
Bu ma (N o > y
nì
To lu (C am a
Ma rres ame ibia)
>
S
ro
m
G
ge
o
p tra
Se ourm ruli it Cre n) > n
>
P s
g
a
Ya atp elw nch daa ole > a
a a
é
bin
W No lun tar Cre ma
C es rthe ka > > g ole > d
hu te r
a
Fre en
j > rn n D y i
nc
ix Ka ag
h>
njo ar
a
ti
ba >
l > tɩ
jix
Arawakan
Oto-Manguean
Mayan
Niger-Congo
unknown
Indo-European
Khoe-Kwadi
Mande
Tupian
Algic
Austronesian
Guaicuruan
Misumalpan
Eastern Sudanic
Eskimo-Aleut
Figure 1: Clustering of 100 pivot past tense markers. Each node is colored based on its family information. Languages with no record on WALS remained white. This clustering is based on JSD of markers
in marking 5960 verses in bible. We observed that most of pivot past and future markers belong to Niger
Congo family and present markers are mostly within Indo-European family. It can be seen that in many
cases languages with the same family behave accordingly in tense marking. For instance, in past tense
marking Oto-Manguean languages use almost the same marker of ni with small writing variations (Figure 1). Although Tezoatlán Mixtec did not have a record on WALS, since its marker is the same as other
Oto-Manguean languages and works almost identical to ni in Oto-Manguean languages, we may guess
this language is also Oto-Manguean, which turned out to be true when we performed further searches.
Tikar > ɓe
Ozumacín Chinantec > maˊ
Tektiteko > tuq
Mazatlán Mixe
> najty
Dyula > tun
Bambar
Luo (Ke a > tun
nya
and Tan
Moris
zania)
yen >
> ne
Sout
hern ti
Mob
Bobo
Madar
Baf a > din
é>m
Far ut > lɛ
ane
ef
Kri are >
da
o
a
Ja > bin
Na maica
w
Sra dm n Cre
Sa nan > da ole En
in
T
glis
M Ha t L on
h>
g
it
u
did
Ma ayan ian C cian o > b
M ya gna reo Cre en
ole
> le
M on ng
Fre
Bo an o (D na > dai > te
nc
g
h>
K kob se em dai
té
G onk aru ng > ocra
ar o
ifu m > b ma tic R
na ba en
ep
>
u
b
lic
áb le
of
a
Co
ng
o)
>
ma
>
that are members of this cluster. This methodology supports the empirical investigation of questions like “how is progressive past tense expressed
in0.93language X”? We just need to look up the cluster(s) that correspond to progressive past tense,
look up the verses that are members and retrieve
the text of these verses in language X.
0.93
To give the reader a flavor of the distinctions
that are reflected in these clusters, we now list phenomena that are characteristic of verses that contain only one of the five pivots; these phenomena
identify properties of one language that the other
four do not have.
CRS “ti”. CRS has a set of markers that can be
systematically combined, in particular, a progressive marker “pe” that can be combined with the
ax
m a
l> >k
ya
>
b'a e
a
njo a'a
Did
'a ar e
Q Kw > v ué ú e
m d
o
Ixil cob a > li >
Yo aka Fa
n
M uth > to > fu
So opi lma i
d
Ch am pu a >
T ong nọ ehm
Git Ika > k > k
ju
ma
a
k
E
m> w
Kaseuri > ra
Tup u > naxa
Sus > giì
yaa
go
Ndo hana) > i > bi
(G
Buli étaro Otom > bi
omi
Quer
mi > bi
uital Ot
Mezq de México Oto
Estado gin > wen
Pid
Hawai'i
beè
Gokana >
Naro > kò
Tzeltal > la
North Alaskan Inupiatun > tavra
past tense marker “ti”. As a result, past progressive sentences in CRS are generally marked with
“ti”. Example: “43004031 Meanwhile, the disciples were urging Jesus, ‘Rabbi, eat something.”’
“crs bible 43004031 Pandan sa letan, bann disip ti
pe sipliy Zezi, ‘Met! Manz en pe.”’
The other four languages do not consistently use
the pivot for marking the past progressive; e.g.,
HWC uses “was begging” in 43004031 (instead of
“wen”) and TCS uses “kip tok strongwan” ‘keep
talking strongly’ in 43004031 (instead of “bin”).
FIJ “qai”. This pivot means “and then”. It
is highly correlated with past tense in the New
Testament because most sequential descriptions
of events are descriptions of past events. But
there are also some non-past sequences. Example:
ll
ne
ua
> yi
id
s a > n d iv a k
in
au
H u n jo ili ( i > m
h
se
V a Dil
>
Sw tun wẹ ole
Te n > Cre
Gu itian wh
h
a
aw
Ha > m
>m n
a
W ra u k > m a
Pa ana ezali
y
>
a
a
W gala
>d
Lin que
ው
s
>ነ
Ba aric
h
ndi
Am ani >
i
>n
w
M
nde o
o
k
Ma
> nd
olo
Pog i > ni
ni
d
da >
Run
rwan
es
Kinya dietsch >
Plaut
er
>
dic
Icelan
> on
Finnish
> on
Estonian
Sami > lea
Northern
Polish > jest
Latin > est
Czech > je
Gheg Albanian > është
English > is
Modern Greek (1453
-) > είναι
Slovak > je
Romania
n > este
Albanian
> është
Low Sa
xon >
es
Germ
an > is
t
Weste
rn Fris
Faro
ian >
ese
is
> er
Fren
c
Mid h > est
Fle dle En
glis
Spa mish
h (1
>
100
is
Vale nish >
-150
0) >
Ru ncian es
is
s
>é
Old sian
s
An Sla > ес
ть
vo
cie
nic
Ira
nt
G
>
re e
ес
As nian
Vla syria Per k (to ть
14
St x R n N sian
eo
> ت53)
L and om
>ε
M atvia ard ani -Ara اﺳ
στ
ma
ιν
B u a la y n > L a > s
ic
i
tvia
l
>
N u (C (ma ir
n
or
>
w a m c ro l
ir
eg e
a
ia r o o n g u
n
N n) > age
yn
or ne ) > a
sk
da
>
er
g
an
ua
ge
)>
ni
Indo-European
Khoe-Kwadi
Mande
Uralic
Central Sudanic
Austro-Asiatic
Austronesian
Chibchan
Afro-Asiatic
er
>
ål
is k m
>
o
ns n B
a
a
i
a
er r
r ik e g
A f o rw h >
ä
as
n
N nis h > est
ɗo
Da edis to >
e>
Sw eran ndï ulfuld
p y> aF
s
a
E ba aw
ĕ
>k
M am n > g
ch
ren
Ad enia
le F
ﭤو
ú
m
reo
Ar hi > p > k
nC
ey
d
d
te
ia
in
c
u
>
S
K
Lu
in
idg
int
Sa
nP
eria
> ta
Nig
ano ) > là
vac
a
Cha (Nigeri
a
> da
M ad
glish
> in
le En
Mam nd Creo
la
Is
a
Se
ko
>
ra
Naro
ibia) >
(Nam
Nama
ﻣﯽ
Dari >
be
Dyula >
> bɛ
Bambara
Zarma > ga
Yucateco > ku
Sango > yeke
Ch
M
ni
)>
ge
ua
ng
l la
ne
ua
> yi
a
n divid k
s
> n
a
au
H unjo ili (i i > m
se
V ah Dil
>
Sw tun wẹ ole
Te n > Cre
Gu itian wh
wh
a
Ha > m
ma n
>
a
W rauk > ma
Pa ana ezali
y
>
a
Wa gala
>d
Lin que
ው
s
>ነ
Ba aric
h
ndi
Am ani >
> ni
Mw
onde
Mak > ndo
olo
Pog > ni
ni
di
Run wanda >
ar
ny
h > es
Ki
ietsc
Plautd
er
dic >
Icelan
> on
h
nis
Fin
n > on
Estonia
Sami > lea
Northern
Polish > jest
Latin > est
Czech > je
Gheg Albanian > është
English > is
Modern Greek (1453-)
> είναι
Slovak > je
Romania
n > este
Albania
n > ësh
të
Low Sa
xon >
es
Germ
an
Wester > ist
n Frisi
Faro
an >
es
is
Fren e > er
ch >
Mid
est
Fle dle Eng
lish
Spa mish
(110
> is
0-15
Vale nish >
00)
es
n
cia
> is
Ru
n>
s
és
Old sian
An Sla > ес
ть
v
c
Ira ient onic
As nian Gree > есть
s
k
Vla yri Pers
(to
14
Sta x R an N ian
5
3)
eo
>ت
nd om
L
>ε
M atvia ard ani -Ara اﺳ
στι
ma
ν
Bu alay n > La > s
ic
lu
(m ir tvia i
>
N
n
o r (C a a c
>
ro
w
ir
la
eg m e
ia roo ngu
n
n
a
)
N
yn > n ge)
>
or
e
ad
sk
a
>
er
Sino-Tibetan
Cariban
Arawakan
Mayan
Basque
Songhay
Niger-Congo
unknown
Indo-European
Khoe-Kwadi
Mande
Uralic
Central Sudanic
Austro-Asiatic
Austronesian
Chibchan
Afro-Asiatic
in
es
e
>
sī
tlhIngan-Hol > oh
Cameroon Mam
bila > né
Rinconada
Bikol > do
Batak To
ba > do
Batak
Simalun
gu
Maith
n
> do
ili > अ
छ
Carib
bean
Hindu
Urdu
stani
> ﮨﮯ
> hai
Hind
i>h
aai
Ma
ra
Djim thi > आ
ह
ini S
Ve
e
n
n
g
o
o>
ufo
Wa
>y
ima lùu
ɛn
H
>
ir
Ca i Motu hano
na
>
P a béca
re c
r > be
ís
rä
Vie > aty
J a tn a m o
G o ra i > e s e
Ikw urm jing > là
Ig e r a n
Tu bo e > ché
pu > b bụ m a
ri
>
u
tie
Na > d
iñ
n
in
Papiamento > ta
Fiji Hindi > hei
Figure 2: Clustering of 100 pivot present tense markers. Each node is colored based on its family
information. Languages with no record on WALS remained white. This clustering is based on JSD of
markers in marking 6590 verses in bible. It can be seen that in many cases languages with the same
family behave accordingly in tense marking.
tlhIngan-Hol > oh
Cameroon Mamb
ila > né
Rinconad
a Bikol >
do
Batak Tob
a
>
do
Batak
Simalu
ngun >
Maith
do
ili > अछ
Carib
bean
Hind
Urdu
ustan
>
i > ha
Hindi ﮨﮯ
i
> ha
Mar
ai
at
Djim hi > आ
Ven ini Sen ह
go
oufo
>
Wa
> yɛ
ima lùu
n
Hir
>
Ca i Motu hano
na
>
P a béca
rec
r > be
ís
rä
Vie > aty
Ja tnam o
Go rai > ese
Ikw urm jing > là
Ig ere anc
hé
Tu bo
>
ma
p
uri > bu bụ
>
tie
Na > d
iñ
n
Ch
in
es
e
>
sī
in
a tense-marked clause in HWC.
While preparing this analysis, we realized that
HWC “wen” unfortunately does not meet one of
the criteria we set out for pivots: it is not unambiguous. In addition to being a past tense marker
(derived from standard English “went”), it can also
be a conjunction, derived from “when”. This ambiguity is the cause for some noise in the clusters
marked for presence of HWC “wen” in the figure.
TCS “bin”. Conditionals is one pattern we
found in verses that are marked with TCS “bin”,
but are not marked for past tense in the other four
languages. Example: “tcs bible 46015046 Wanem
i bin kam pas i da nomal bodi ane den da spiritbodi i bin kam apta.” ‘what came first is the
normal body and then the spirit body came after’, “eng newliving 46015046 What comes first
is the natural body, then the spiritual body comes
later.” Apparently, “bin” also has a modal aspect
in TCS: generic statements that do not refer to
specific events are rendered using “bin” in TCS
whereas the other four languages (and also English) use the default unmarked tense, i.e., present
tense.
TZO “laj”. This pivot indicates perfective aspect. The other four past tense pivots are not perfective markers, so that there are verses that are
marked with “laj”, but not marked with the past
tense pivots of the other four languages. Example: “tzo huixtan 40010042 . . . ja’ch-ac’bat ben-
Papiamento > ta
Fiji Hindi > hei
0.39
M
“eng newliving 44009016 And I will show him
how much he must suffer for my name’s sake.”
“fij hindi 44009016 Au na qai vakatakila vua na
levu ni ka e na sota kaya e na vukuqu.” This
verse is future tense, but it continues a temporal sequence (it starts in the preceding verse) and therefore FIJ uses “qai”. The pivots of the other four
languages are not general markers of temporal sequentiality,
so they are not used for the future.
0.39
HWC “wen”. HWC is less explicit than the
other four languages in some respects and more
explicit in others. It is less explicit in that not
all sentences in a sequence of past tense sentences
need to be marked explicitly with “wen”, resulting
in some sentences that are indistinguishable from
present tense. On the other hand, we found many
cases of noun phrases in the other four languages
that refer implicitly to the past, but are translated as a verb with explicit past tense marking in
HWC. Examples: “hwc 2000 40026046 Da guy
who wen set me up . . . ” ‘the guy who WEN set
me up’, “eng newliving 40026046 . . . my betrayer
. . . ”; “hwc 2000 43008005 . . . Moses wen tell us
in da Rules . . . ” ‘Moses WEN tell us in the rules’,
“eng newliving 43008005 The law of Moses says
. . . ”; “hwc 2000 47006012 We wen give you guys
our love . . . ”, “eng newliving 47006012 There is
no lack of love on our part . . . ”. In these cases, the
other four languages (and English too) use a noun
phrase with no tense marking that is translated as
er
>
ål
is km
>
s
Bo
an ian
ika eg
er r
s
Afr orw h >
ä
n
N nis h > esta
ɗo
Da edis to >
e>
Sw eran ndï ulfuld
>
F
p
Es bay awa gĕ
> ka
M am n >
nch
Ad enia
Fre
ﭤو
ú
ole
Arm hi > p > k
Cre
d
an
dey
Sin Kute t Luci gin >
id
in
Sa ian P
er
> ta
no
Nig
) > là
vaca
Cha (Nigeria
da
a
sh >
Mad
Engli
> in
eole
Mam
d Cr
Islan
a
Se
> ko
ra
Naro
ibia) >
(Nam
Nama
ﻣ
ﯽ
>
Dari
be
Dyula >
> bɛ
Bambara
Zarma > ga
Yucateco > ku
Sango > yeke
si
>
o an n
i
nk n
a
ra i > > n k e
ba
K u o n n r u li b a h
a>
K m p > na
ém
k
a
M a ju s i > n c h
E k M o s rm a ta
a
>
u
>g
ŋ
G o nga ba ʋn
> ja
m
w
o
Ts nko re > isaala
o
a
S
K re f
ng ɩ
a
lu
F
a
>s
mu
v
> ta
Tu saal > pa
yua inea)
a
Pa ngoa Daw >
Gu
ew
Ta ng
o
aN
Hm (Papu u
o
Kara yen > p > lə
)
s
Mori (Nigeria > go
a
in
Mad an Pidg
ri
Nige go
> ya
Arhe
>
kpelaKrio
-O
North
wahn
Ivbie
glish >
Kriol En
e
liz
Be
e
Lote > lap
> zi
Tampulma
> cua
orado Mixtec
San Juan Col
Huastec > ne
Chuj > ol
Tsimané > ra
Quiché > na
Tabasco Chontal >
xe
Kamwe > dzə
gə
Naro > gh
a
Chayuc
o Mixte
c > cua
Sio > m
a
Hiri M
otu >
do
Vlax
Rom
a
Iraya
ni > ka
Sea > batay
Is
Sain land C
Tha t Lucia reole En
n
i
glish
Cre
G e > จะ
> gw
ole
n>
Fre
ine
nch
Sa la
> ka
s
y
M a ak >
Sta 'anya gen
Ce nda n >
sag
rd
B n tr
M
Ind iatah al Ma alay ar
>a
En one Bid lay
Bu glis sian ayuh > ka kan
lg a h >
>
>
P a ri
re
ak
w
a
a
ill
B p ia n
n
V aba m e > щ
J a ie t n M a n t o е
r a a m la
>
i> e y
lo
>
s
či e
> nan
s ẽ ti
Khoe-Kwadi
Torricelli
Mande
Tai-Kadai
Austro-Asiatic
Austronesian
Afro-Asiatic
Hmong-Mien
Lashi > wa
Achang > das
Zaiwa > râ
Mün Chin >
khai
Tedim Ch
in > ding
Siyin
Ch
in
> tu
Zo
u
>
di
Mak (N ng
Hakh igeria) > di
ng
a Ch
in
Fala
> lai
Ng m Chin
Tum awn Ch > ding
in >
a-Iru
tuk
Sua m u >
a
Ce u > ab pi
Ng rma > o
ka
Ma iemb
oo
la
Iw y (m n > g
a
a
e
Ar l > a crola
o
ng
K u p -L to b
ua
ge
K ot oke
)>
Bw uw > eb p >
aka
ole
n
W an aa > a
es ab
v
W M a t-C w a e
S o est ske ent na >
ra
u e ly
t
h e rn K n e s l L i k a n
rn a n > m b i
B o jo d e r a >
ba
eh
kɔ
l
ŋ
>
ad oj
ar
é
>
na
i
se
li >
Di
u n a k ta k
t
Te > t > ḓo > ќе
k >
a
W arau da nian
P Ven edo
c
ta
ɛ
M a ko > > ny ge
K a enya > pa ng
D h u a tu ru
ll
K a an > ska a
>
s
h
Ne dish iga >
e
y
Sw th Giz o > a e
n
u
a
a
o
c
S
mb
ava > ba
h
C
a
lam > bae
h
is
B
am e
Pijin rou > k
d
i
Nyin in > ba
Pis
k
o
T
> tem
Malê
ac > oc
Bugaw
> eke
Bukiyip
> la
Mengen
nch > pou
Creole Fre
Seselwa
> goin
Hawai'i Pidgin
sal
>
Afrikaans
Bekwarra > ba
bo
si
>
o an
in
nk n
a
ra i > > n k e
ba
Ku onn ruli bah
a>
K m p > na
ém
k
a
M aju si > nch
Ek Mos rma ta
a
>
u
>g
ŋ
G o nga ba ʋn
> ja
m
w
o
Ts nko re > isaala
Ko refa g S
n
Fa ulu > sɩ
a
m
v
> ta
Tu saal > pa
yua
a
a
nea)
>
a
P
go
Gui
aw
Tan ng D
New
o
Hm (Papua u
a
po
ar
>
K
n
) > lə
isye
Mor (Nigeria > go
a
in
Mad
Pidg
rian
Nige go
> ya
-Arhe
>
Krio
-Okpela
North
wahn
Ivbie
glish >
Kriol En
Belize
e
Lote > lap
a > zi
pulm
cua
Tam
ado Mixtec >
San Juan Color
Huastec > ne
Chuj > ol
Tsimané > ra
Quiché > na
Tabasco Chontal >
xe
Kamwe > dzəgə
Naro > gha
Chayuc
o Mixtec
> cua
Sio > ma
Hiri Mo
tu > do
Vlax
Rom
ani >
Iraya
ka
Sea > batay
Is
Saint land C
reol
Luci
Tha
an C e Englis
Ge i > จะ
reol
h>
n>
gwin
e Fre
e
nch
Sa la
> ka
s
y
M a ak >
Sta 'any gen
Ce nda an >
Bia ntra rd M saga
r
Ind tah l Ma alay
En one Bid lay > > ak
an
ka
Bu glis sian ayuh
lg h
Pa ari > w > ak > re
an
ill
B pia an
V aba m e > щ
Ja ietn Ma nto е
ra am la
>
i> e y
lo
či se > na
>
sẽ nti
Sino-Tibetan
Oto-Manguean
Mayan
Mosetenan
Niger-Congo
unknown
Kuot
Indo-European
Khoe-Kwadi
Torricelli
Mande
Tai-Kadai
Austro-Asiatic
Austronesian
Afro-Asiatic
Hmong-Mien
M
Figure 3: Clustering of 100 pivot future tense markers. Each node is colored based on its family
information. Languages with no record on WALS remained white. This clustering is based on JSD of
markers in marking 5733 verses in bible. It can be seen that in many cases languages with the same
family behave accordingly in tense marking.
5
Related work
Our work is inspired by (Cysouw, 2014; Cysouw
and Wälchli, 2007); see also (Dahl, 2007; Wälchli,
2010). Cysouw creates maps like Figure 5 by
manually identifying occurrences of the proper
noun “Bible” in a parallel corpus of Jehovah’s
Witnesses’ texts. Areas of the map correspond
to semantic roles, e.g., the Bible as actor (it tells
you to do something) or as object (it was printed).
This is a definition of semantic roles that is complementary to and different from prior typological research because it is empirically grounded in
real language use across a large number of languages. It allows typologists to investigate traditional questions from a radically new perspective.
The field of typology is important for both theoretical (Greenberg, 1960; Whaley, 1996; Croft,
2002) and computational (Heiden et al., 2000;
Santaholma, 2007; Bender, 2009, 2011) linguis0.31
Lashi > wa
Achang > das
Zaiwa > râ
Mün Chin >
khai
Tedim Chin
> ding
Siyin Chi
n > tu
Zou >
din
Mak (N g
Hakh igeria) > din
a
Ch
in > lai g
Fala
Nga m Chin
Tum wn Chi > ding
n
a-Ir
umu > tuk
Sua
> ap
i
Ce u > ab
Ng rma > o
ka
Ma iemb
oo
la
Iwa y (ma n > g
e
Aro l > a crola
ng
Ku p-L tob
ua
ge
K ot oke
)>
Bw uw > eb p >
aka
ole
n
W an aa > a
es ab
w ve
W Ma tC
a
So este ske entr na >
uth rn lyn al
ka
er Ka es > Lim ni
n
b
Bo njo der a >
bo bal eh
kɔ
ŋ
M >o
ad j
ar
é
>
na
dición yu’un hech laj spas . . . ” (literally “a blessing . . . LAJ make”), “eng newliving 40010042
. . . you will surely be rewarded.” Perfective aspect
and past are correlated in the real world since most
events that are viewed as simple wholes are in the
past. But future events can also be viewed this way
as the example shows.
Similar maps for present and future tenses are
0.31
presented in the Figure 6 and Figure 7.
i
se
i>
Dil
n
k
tu k
Te > ta > ta ḓo > ќе
a uk >
W ara da nian
P Ven edo
c
ta
ɛ
M a ko > > ny ge
K a enya > pa ng
D hua turu
ll
K a an > ska a
>
s
h
Ne dish iga >
e
y
Sw th Giz o > a e
n
u
So vaca bamba
a
Ch ma > e
la
Bis ijin > ba kameh
>
P
rou
i
nd
yi
N
> ba
Pisin
Tok
> tem
Malê
oc
wac >
Buga
> eke
ip
kiy
Bu
> la
Mengen
ch > pou
Creole Fren
Seselwa
n > goin
Hawai'i Pidgi
Afrikaans > sal
Bekwarra > ba
tics. Typology is concerned with all areas of linguistics: morphology (Song, 2014), syntax (Comrie, 1989; Croft, 2001; Croft and Poole, 2008;
Song, 2014), semantic roles (Hartmann et al.,
2014; Cysouw, 2014), semantics (KoptjevskajaTamm et al., 2007; Dahl, 2014; Wälchli and
Cysouw, 2012; Sharma, 2009) etc. Typological information is important for many NLP tasks including discourse analysis (Myhill and Myhill, 1992),
information retrieval (Pirkola, 2001), POS tagging (Bohnet and Nivre, 2012), parsing (Bohnet
and Nivre, 2012; McDonald et al., 2013), machine
translation (Hajič et al., 2000; Kunchukuttan and
Bhattacharyya, 2016) and morphology (Bohnet
et al., 2013).
Tense is a central phenomenon in linguistics
and the languages of the world differ greatly in
whether and how they express tense (Traugott,
1978; Bybee and Dahl, 1989; Dahl, 2000, 1985;
Santos, 2004; Dahl, 2007; Santos, 2004; Dahl,
2014).
Low resource. Even resources with the widest
coverage like World Atlas of Linguistic Structures
(WALS) (Dryer et al., 2005) have little information for hundreds of languages. Many researchers
have taken advantage of parallel information for
extracting linguistic knowledge in low-resource
settings (Resnik et al., 1997; Resnik, 2004; Mihalcea and Simard, 2005; Mayer and Cysouw, 2014;
107 Language based on their average divergence in past, present, and future markings
Ce
Piapoco
Kobon
Kalam
Tai
Kaqchikel
Turkish
Minica Huitoto
Caquinte
Kein
Northern Puebla Nahuatl
Cotabato Manobo
Central Tunebo
Muinane
Gofa
Cashibo-Cacataibo
Avaric
Kuman (Papua
New Guinea)
Highland Oaxaca
Chontal
Daga
Saniyo-Hiy
Border Kunaewe
Northern
Adamawa Pastaza Quichua
Tezoatlán Fulfulde
Mixtec
Peñoles Mixtec
Limos Kalinga
San Blas
Kuna
Mbay
Yuracar
Central e
Highlan Aymara
Western d Puebla Nahuat
Bolivia
Coptic
n Guaranl
í
Pisaflo
Karam res Tepehua
ojong
Jola-Fonyi
San Migue
l El Grand
Atatlá
e Mixte
Jamilt huca Mixte
c
Karka epec Mixte c
c
Akha r-Yuri
Saram
accan
Diuxi-Tila
Pwo North
ntong
o
Mixte
Easte
ern Karen
c
Chic rn Bru
Tzot hicapan Zapo
tec
Cabé zil
car
Mos
Mey kona
Mara ah
Ama thi
tlán
Sant
Zapo
Coa a María tec
Russ tecas AltaQuiegola
s Zapo ni Zapo
Old ian
Slav
tec
tec
Slov onic
Mad enian
Wuv ak
Yag ulu-Aua
Siri ua
Pila onó
Mü gá
Mat n Chin
Kac u Chi
Lea hin n
Ma lao Chi
Aka cushi nantec
wai
San
o
Car Juan
Iba ibbeanAtzing
Jav o Pop
Cho n
ane
olo
l
se
Me
ca
Cer ngen
Ne ma
Lan han
Ku go (Ug
Yuc mam and
a)
Lac ateco
Sap andon
Ce osa
Mo ntral
Ten cov Sama
Ma ang í
Easte ori o Oto
mi
Mo rn
Ur ose Highla
Fij du Cree nd
Oto
Tu ian
mi
Hindngag
Ly i
Ka élé
So pin
Fo utherngamara
Sa n
Nu ng
ni i
Sa n Ma
Bu ngo rtín
Itu
Ge glere
ny
Ya n
oso
M be
Tri
qu
Bu aposm
i
M gawa Bu
Qu alê c ang
Bu ich
Bu kiy é
Ivb mb ip
Am ie Noita Ar
ba
M
rth apesh
-O
To angg i
kp
Ac l
a Bu
ela
Po hi
-A
an
rhe
Ub qomc
g
Ar ir
hi'
Ch ifa
Ku am ma
Nd ke ac -M
Ira o le oco iniafi
a
Bo ya
Ch lin
M am ao
Ko or or
Sa re o ro
Ta rang an
No gaba an
i
M
Su an rther wa Man
ob
Sa lka darin n Kh
o
W te
Ch mer
A ip ré-M
in
K pi i
es
aw
e
A wai nayé
é
M lgon o
w
H Daw ag qu
Sa ua aw ha in
Ya nu utla a vul
N no má M
az
Ze do m
atec
H m ng ám
an ba a i
un
oo
Southern Rincon Zapotec
Zacatlán-Ahuacatlán-Tepetzintla Nahuatl
Tena Lowland Quichua
Guahibo
Tuyuca
Kafa
Nalca
Samberigi
Matsés
Yongkom
Guerrero Amuzgo
Camsá
Aruamu
Yatee Zapotec
Muna
Wiru
Angor
Ewage-Notu
Makasar
Iduna
Kumyk
Popoloca
Tlalcoyalco
Inga
San Marcos
Wayuu
Bargam
Murui Huitoto
Mian
Dawro
Wolaytta
Nahuatl
Huasteca Nahuatl
Western
a
Central Huastec a Nahuatl
HuastecKagayanen
Eastern
ca
d Popolu
Highlan
Bimin
Bora
)
New Guinea
ahua
Awa (Papua Cashin apra
shi-Sh
Cando Biangai
min
Oksap
biano
Guam
rn Kayah
Weste Quechua
ui
Ancash Salt-Y
hucos
sheq
Tama ano
ern Conc
South
Kam uer
Cuaiq
Awa- ahuita
ia
Chay
Wask le
Ame
hua
Tepe n
uetla
Goli a
t Tann e
hwes
Sout Koreguajeo
Cub a
ueng
atsig
Nom Ngalumga
urun
Surs Patep
Hueh
Iamalele
Olo
r
aapo
bú-K
Uru Bedjond
rinã
Apu n
iatu
Inup Fasu
skan
ha
aata
th Ala
Nor
Ang chua i
Que oran
Wa ran
Martín
assa
San
Tab -Kasa i
Jola gga s
Ban Nia
fian
Mu ama
Bun yle
Kab ra
Keapaiba
Cu tsa
bak
Rik Chin a
ung lim
Zot Mo teco
an
Uspan
l Bla
an
ada Bla ion
ron
nik
Ko angani
Ma ona c
Sar
Pam abi
Ar ní
an ara
adi Gu Tabo
Ch ayan
potec ac
agu
rí ZaTotonberá
Par
i
uie
-Q rez Em dib
ani Juá ern Da ec
uit
zat a
ioq c De rth
aw
Qu epe No
la Ma
aut 'Auhelichʼin lí
Xicot
Ay
Gw xaka er
Ma Carri ay
ern isn tec
uth Gü po
So tés Za tec
e
po
am
Lh ncón a Za Alun eo
chí Ri Taba
Mekarik a
Wi
M aiv
ok
Or potectec
n Za po ní
tlá Za
ua ec Guaranasi
ara
tep
Miaholo livian Ka um cana
rah
Oz Bo
Ta Ta veharo
rn
al
ina
ste
ntr
M Ka nob ec
Ea
Ce
tak
Ba NoboMixt ec
ixt bu
c
pe M Sa m
se o
ote úa
Ka or yo
Oc sond
ug
Yo
na ya
Si Do asauun
m
Ka upiat hua o
In ec ob a
ka Qu ác ár l
as o Ch biku Ho ai
Al uc
m ne
st án
Na ga Thines e
es ili
rn tlhIn
o Hu
a Chnam D i
uthe
kk et tun Jara jin
So
Ha Vi Te
Pi in
Ch in é
lam n Ch an h
Fa Siyi im yu c
Ts da ste ir
Bi ua ng ju
H Sa ga ay
N al k
atah
sa
Bi
lM
ra Sa
nt
we
rth na
No Pa
St
an
da
rd
Bu M
Nam
gi al
To ne ay
Bw a (N Ta Tb belo se
an am ba oli
ab ib ru
w ia
N an )
Ala U apu a
Ea
ng ma
cis ste
To
an
k Pi Iw
co rn
al
Ha León Tawb Ku sin
wa Zo ui ot
i'i qu d
Pi
W
Ti dg e
es
Ni tern Q'an Nacunain
ge Ka jo ro
ria nj b'a
n Pi ob l
To No Mad Gi Tz dgin al
rre rth a
elt
s St ern (Nigekyod al
rai Da ria e
t Cr ga )
ra
Ka Patpa eole
ing tar
Qa ang
Plap Ta
Es
Kr qe
tad
o Krmpulm iol t
o de
um
Nd en a
M Méx
og
Se Qu ezqu ico
sel eré ita Ot Ixi o
wa tar l Ot om l
Cr o
eo Ot omi i
le
om
Ch Fr
av en i
ac
Ta anoch
ng
oa
Gi Chuj
ton
Kw Chopga
ara i
Djim
'ae
ini Ma Ika
Seno kaa
ufo
San
Ba
ba Igb
Jua
Ma o
n Co
Yo lay
lor Ma rub
Go ado mp a
urm Mi rul
anc xte i
Bu
lu (CaAfrik hém c
me aans a
roo
Ko n)
Ek nni
Ku ajuk
ran
Bu Mandi ko
li (Gh nka
Yal ana)
unk
Sus a
Hir Tupuriu
i Mo
YocUrak Law
tu
obo
ué Didoi'
Zai a
Las wa
Ma hi
Kah ru
Sou
ua
ther
Hau
n Pue South sa
bla
Fal
Mix i
tec
Tim
ugo Konso
n
Yan Murut
Kan esha
kan '
Nya aey
nko
Nyo le
Southea
Kut ro
Sho u
stern
na
Pueb
la NahLenje
Trin uatl
Igna itario
cian
Mac
o
higu
enga
Sout
zulu
Huam
Nort h Ndebele
alíes
h Ndeb
Marg -Dos de
ele
os-Yarow Mayo
Gusi
ilca-L Huánuco Tharakai
South auricocha Quechua
North Bolivian Quechua
Quec
Boliv
Huall
aga Huán ian Quec hua
North uco Quec hua
Junín
Quec hua
Kamb hua
aata
Tatar
Bashk
Kara-Kalpa ir
Karachay-B
k
alkar
Uzbek
Chuva
sh
Easter
Southe n Mari
rn Altai
South Azerba
Azerba ijani
ijani
Fr
c
te
an
in
qw Ch e
Ira sila
U uo nzim
K oo
o
Kisi
K enger rn
atin
N ue he
o d Ch
N ut inya
So gr k e atin an
Ti du uy a Ch ighl
U um al H
M op rn ese
tal
on
N ste ur e
Ea ad es o Ch
M lin sc ra
Ba ba faan jára in
Ta Na aja Ch
ta
Gu wm ese
Ba rm tak
n Ag
Bu lan irí
ya
ga
Ba ka
Ba oreo l Ca
Ay ntra
a
an
Ce ac
M g an
De mo arí
Sa um nte o
Pa vá ga
Xa lan
a
ay
Ba an e
Gb
Us on
st
No m we
Ki rth a
No wa
Ku ossi gam
M an l
Ng saa al
Ku asa
Pa cham
Nt mobaarra
Bi kw
Be zi
tho
Lo ko ern So
Ka uth
So pedi a
Se an
Tsw ula
ngo
Dy mbara axa
Ba asong n
glish
En
Xa meniayen
nch
ole
Ar ris
Fre
Cre
Mo io
ole
nd
Kr Isla
n Cre
Sea fut
cia
Ba nt Lu
ål
Sai
km sk
te
Vu ar
n Bo nor
Tik rwegia n Ny
No rwegia
No nish
Da glish mani
En x Ro
Vla edish
)
0)
Sw anian anian (1453- 150
Alb eg Alb ek (1100Gh dern Gre lish
Mo dle Eng ole lish
Midtian Creol Eng
Hai ize Kri
Bel ba
Mo efare
Far da
Ven iamento
Pap ndrou p
Nyi p-Loke
Aro am
Mananyan r
Ma' u-Gudu
Mof we
Irig abí
yah
Kay au Ken
bila
Wah imba
Tsik eroon Mam
Cam a
Zarm
Suau o
Ninz rib
Dog
aré
Iu Mien
Mad
Lobi hern Bobo
Sout a
Hang
Zou (Nigeria)
Mak Chin
Tedimngkabau
Mina
anu
Term a Chin
Hakh krou
Adiou
Hdi
Jur ModoChinese
Min Nan
g Daw
Hmon
Gun
Wa
ge)
Parauk (macrolangua
Malay se
Javane se
Achine Senoufo
ic of Congo)
ratic Republ
Supyire
Mono (Democ
ng
Mangse
Koorete
Galibi Carib
Cheroke
e
Arabela
Ossetic
Russia Buriat
Oirat
Khakas
Chimborazo
Lelemi
Highland
Cañar Highland Quichua
Quichua
Ayacucho Quechua
Cusco Quechua
Ajyíninka Apurucayali
Ucayali-Yurúa
Ashéninka
Pichis Ashéninka
Huichol
Ama (Papua New
Guinea)
Chachi
Woun Meu
Alamblak
Mayo
Gwahatike
Gumuz
Northern Paiute
Naasioi
Southern Pastaza Quechua
Telugu
Kamula
Fore
Mountain Koiali
Kwoma
Lambayeque Quechua
Sharanahua
Yaminahua
Northern Oaxaca Nahuatl
Sukuma
Achuar-Shiwiar
Chuave
Asháninka
Awiyaana
Kosena
Páez
Eastern Tamang
Kyrgyz
Shuar
Kazakh
Quechua
Huaylas Ancash Quechua
Ancash
Quechua
Northern Conchucos
Eastern Apurímac Quechua
Huaylla Wanca Imbongu
Bo-Ung
gu
Umbu-Un
Kube
iawari
Somba-S
Borong
Mape
Rawa
amane
Guhu-S Nabak
Korafe-Yegha
Yareba
uha
Yawey t
Selepe
m
Aekyo
Yipma
g
Henen
Angal Punjabi
bisa
Huam o
Yopn
Haya
tec
chi Zapo tec
Yatza
Zapo
ocho Iatmul
Zoog
gana
Keya Kaili
Ledo neña
Cavi ufa
Usar tec
Zapo a
YalálagAguarun i
Bauz o
Gam
wa
Ojib
eta
kwe
Mar Limbu
nal
ka Pajo
énin Tepehuane
Ash
n
Mix
NortherJuquila Yaqui
wa
Ojib a
Severn Tepehuan
ilco
ehu
Tep
hich
Tlac stern Zapoteca
ey Kew
thea
Sou a Vall West Kewa
t
olul
Eas niboa
Tlac
-Co Cor
tern
a
Wes
esa
Shipibo
ta Ter ar Corga
San El Nay pan a
Pam ann
er-B Boo
Ham
ian
Zyr a
w
Komi-Durum
Hebre o
ong
Ko saaba
Ma dhi
Sin ayo
-M í
san Apala ú
Yes
ruk
ndu ka
Mu Din ri
estern Laaifor
thw
Bir u
Sou
lba Buam na
Ma
Ba ng
nya re
Ke äbe
Ng tonac
To Yele
tla
ga
too ri
Papan
Da kae 'di
ara
at
Am Ma
alé
ng ec
Da zat fán
Ma Co ís
az
rec
Dí
Pa arim
De
nh
Te Bomuer
apa
rri
Jal
Ca gon
Do no
So Tucabiyè r
ro
Ka me
To
Kh a
al echuren
ntr
Ce a Qu Ka lian
arc aw go he
jam S'g Mon Apacomo
se
Ca
lh n
Ha ester rn OrAkoo ese
gu lde
W ste
Ea
rtu lfu pi
Po n Fu Ho
lee
ria
Se tec i
ge
po arh
Ni
a Za sg ge
itl tti ra do
M Chha t Gu lora hua
t Be CoQuec rnta a
ba
ra ar a
d
Se
an Ar m ay
wl n hu
ala
Lo ester Tara t Gb ng ya
po W and hwes Li Seco atl a
hu hu a
Na
wl ut
Lo So
n Na na an n
cá pa ay ria n
oa Ca W ga lia ne
Ita Bi a
ich
Hun
ss
M
Bi turu u
ul i
NyaKag an
w de
M an ba
N Su an
ni c
ai bi n
kr ra ia
U A rg
rd eo
da G
an
St
Lahu
Achang na Peñasco Mixtec
Magdale
Kouya
Miyobe
Mbyá Guaraní
Eastern Karaboro
Waama
Mündü
Nigeria Mambila
Konkomba
Kamwe
Tojolabal
Obo Manobo
Nakanai
Dan
Kara (Papua New Guinea)
Guinea Kpelle
Baatonum
Tsonga
Romanian
Croatian
Kutep
Japanese
da
an
aní
Pisaflore
Karamojos Tepehua
Jola-Fon ng
San Mig yi
Atatláhu uel El Gra
Jamiltep ca Mixtec nde Mixtec
Karkar- ec Mixtec
Akha Yuri
Sarama
Diuxi-Tccan
Pwo Norilantongo
Eastern thern Kar Mixtec
en
Chichi Bru
Tzotzil capan Zap
otec
Cabéca
Mosko r
Meyah na
Marath
Amatlá i
n Zap
San
Co ta María otec
Russiatecas Alt Quieg
as Za olani Za
Old an
potec
potec
Sla
Slovenvonic
Madak ian
Wuvu
Yagu lu-Au
a
Siriona
Pilag ó
Mün á
Matu Chin
Kach Chin
Leala in
Mac o Ch
Akawushi inante
c
San aio
Ca Juan
IbanribbeanAtzingo
Java Po
Ch
nese poloc
Menol
a
Ce gen
Ne rma
Langhan
Ku o (U
Yu mam gand
a)
Lacacateco
Sa nd
Centposa on
M ral
Te ocov Sama
M nang í
Ea aori o Oto
mi
M stern
Urdoose Highl
Fijia u Cree and
Oto
Tu n
mi
Hin ngag
Ly di
K élé
So apinga
Fo uthe mar
rn
Sa n
Nun angi
Sa n Mar
i
Bugngo tín
Itun
Gen lere
yo
Yab
so
Triq
M em
Bug apos
ui
M aw B
Q alê ac uang
B uich
B ukiy é
Iv um ip
Ambie Nbita A
M ba orth rape
-O sh
T anggi
kp
Achol
aB
el
a-A
P
ua
i
ng
U oqom
rhe
A bir ch
i'
C rifa
K ham m
N uk ac a-M
Iray do ele oco inia
fia
B a
Ch olin
M am ao
K o o
S ore ro rro
Tagaran an
No ab gan
aw i
Su Man rther a Man
ob
S lka darin n K
o
W ater
Ch hmer
A ip éin
K pin i Maw
es
A w ay
e
é
M lgo aio é
w n
H Daw ag qu
S ua aw h in
Ya anu utla a avu
l
N n m M
Z d om á
az
ate
H em ong ám
an ba a i
c
un
oo
St
Sta
nd
ard
Bu M
g a
To ine lay
Bw a (N T Tb belo se
an am aba oli
ab ib ru
w ia
Nap an )
Ala U u a
Eas
ng m a
sc tern Tok Iw an
o
P al
HawLeó Taw Ku isin
n
ai'i Zo buid ot
P qu
Tic idg e
Q'a
u in
n N na
an job'aaro
jo
idg bal l
ltalin
de
Nam
Mansaka
Ata Manobo
Botolan Sambal
Namiae
Barai
Tereno
Tlahuitoltepec Mixe
Texmelucan Zapotec
Totontepec Mixe
Batad Ifugao
Teutila Cuicatec
Kyaka
Karajá
Nepali (individual language)
Chipaya
Southern Rincon Zapotec
Zacatlán-Ahuacatlán-Tepetzintla Nahuatl
Tena Lowland Quichua
Guahibo
Tuyuca
Kafa
Nalca
Samberigi
Matsés
Yongkom
Guerrero Amuzgo
Camsá
Aruamu
Yatee Zapotec
Muna
Wiru
Angor
Ewage-Notu
Makasar
Iduna
Kumyk
Popoloca
Tlalcoyalco
Inga
San Marcos
Wayuu
Bargam
o
Murui Huitot
Mian
Dawro
Wolaytta
Nahuatl
Huasteca Nahuatl
Western
teca
Central Huas teca Nahuatl n
Huas Kagayane
Eastern
Popolucain
Highland
Bim
Bora
Guinea)
ua New inahua
Cash apra
Awa (Pap
i-Sh
Candosh Biangai
in
Oksapm
ano
Guambi ah
Kay
WesternQuechua i
Ancash Salt-Yueq
chucos
Tamashano
n Con
Souther
Kam r
uaique
Awa-C yahuita
Cha
Waskia
Amelea
ehu
etla Tep lin
Go
Huehu
na
est Tanuaje
Southw reg
Ko
Cubeo
ga
tsiguen m
Noma Ngalurunga
SursuPatep
le
IamaleOlo
aapor
ú-K nd
Urub Bedjo nã
Apuri
piatun
su
an Inu Fa
Alask
ataha
North
Anga echua i
ran
ín Qu Wao ran
Mart
ssa
San
Tabala-Kasa i
Jo ngga
Ba Nias
an
Mufi ma
Bunabyle
Ka ara
Keap iba
Cu
aktsa
Rikb China
ng im
Zotu Mol teco
an n
Usp Blaa n
al
aa
onad i Bl ion
Kor ranganManik ona
Sa
Pamrabic
A raní
dian GuaTabo
c
Chaayan
pote nac
gu
í Za to rá
Para
uier To be i
-Q árez Em ib
tani e Ju thern Dadatec
a
oqui ec D Nor
Mazelaw
Qui otep
utla uh hʼin í
Xic
Aya 'A Gwic akal er
MaxCarri ay
rn üisn ec
uthe s G ot
So mté n Zapapotecne
Lha có Z lu
hí Rin baa A ekeoik
Ta
M
Wic
Mar iva
ka ec
Oroapot ec
n Z apot ní
atlá c Z ra i
hu tepe n GuaKanas ara
Miazolo ivia
um a
ah acan a
O Bol
Tar T aveh o
in ar
tern
tral
M ak Konob c
Eas
te
Cen
Bat Nob Mix tec u
ix
c
M ab
tepedúa S asemro
K go o
Oco on
au yay
Yos
Sin Do asau n
tu a
Kamupia hu obo
a
ec
a In Qu Chác uár ol
bik -H hai
lask uco
an
e
t A uán
NamIng Tines e i
wes H
h es il
ern tlh
C
rth ao
am D i
uth
ka ietn un ra
No Pan
So
Ja ijin
Hak V Tet
P in
Ch hin
am C ané h
Fal iyin sim ayu ec
S T id st gir
B ua an aju
tah H S Ng alay k
Bia
M asa
al S
ntr
Ce
0.02
Gilbertese
Bariai
Tamil
Sio
Burarra
Tinputz
Bambam
Kono (Sierra
Leone)
Pinotep
Toraja- a Nacional Mixtec
Ngawn Sa'dan
Tachel Chin
hit
Ambulas
Merey
Chortí
Timne
Tawal
South a
Ramoern Samo
aaina
Kekc
Chuu hí
Kuan kese
Serbi ua
Mars an
Mbu hallese
Juku ko
Kuw n Takum
Chumaataay
Shill burung
Silac uk
Lach ayoapan
Isthm ixío Zapo Mixtec
Izer us Zapo tec
tec
Gud e
Wes e
Mun tern Pen
an
Dii dani
May
Gap oyao
Kim apaiwa Ifugao
Mo ré
Sou tu
Anu thern Biri
Mu fo
for
Cac yang
Me ua
Comlpa
Gok altepec
Chi
Kupanana
nan
Hel
tec
ong g Malay
Tob
Pop a
Kw ti'
Ny anyam
We abwa a
Ka stern
Ga diwéu Bukid
non
Ag ro
Ma
Tak uacate
nob
co
o
Tep ia
Ma eux
Ya m ila Cu
ica
Bu wa
tec
Ch hid
Muiquitan
o
Ka rle
Es daz
Öm e Ejj an Du
sun
Me ie a
Ce nta
Mo ntral wai
Up pán Bonto
Ta per Ma
k
Go laa Ne ya
Tu ron ndig caxa
To
Do wa talo
ton
Ga bu li Ifu
ac
gao
Zu rifun
Qu lgo a
Ad iot -Gem
Bo ele epec ze
Ch k
Bu koba
ina
Ka sa ru
nte
Sa mb
c
Ar n M era
os ate
Ka i
o De
M ya
lM
Pa anggpó
ar
Th rkwa ara
Hu
i
Ab ad
av
Ro au o Ch
e
De tok
in
Sa lo as
Iy r
Iy ojwa
W o'w 'ja
Ow ol uj Ch
Di a of wa or
Ch ot
M tam
or e
M as m
ote
La am ana ari
Be m ar
Ve te- a (T a Se
Be
no
og
ng
Na
W wd o ndi o) ufo
Ch ap m
Nor ay ish
an
In Lush theauco a
M
Si do
N ss ne ai stern ixte
Ep gi ala sia
Din c
n
W en em
ka
D ar a boon
U en is
W ab Mya
es et
t-C o
en
tra
l Li
m
ba
n
fia be ia
ala
Ba m edonian
sa
Be ac ar
Si
sh
g
di
M lg a
Bu gl ulun a Kur
ni
Va m monern
sta
Tu ta
du
Pa orth ola
N dh thili di Hin
ia)
A ai Hin an
an
M ji be
nz
Fi rib ito
d Ta
a
Ca ísk
M ri angngna ya an
Da ay an en e o
tec
M ay (K nd ng
M o aa To
inan
) ish
Lu m an
No an iteko an Chixe voireEngl
Sr kt iap M e d'I le
Te ch us ôt eo c
So hm a (C Cr ria
Ist ur an Sy abic
To maic al Ar ni
Ja assictian ma
Cl yp Ro
Eg
c
ixe
hi
M
Sintead h
nte
ina
Aw els atlán
aic
W az ati ín Ch
ram
M jar ac
o-A
Gu um
Oz sh
n Ne
Iri syria ba
no
As lam
ati
Ni wo
d Ch
Lu e
lan
gh atino
Ew golo
Po sque rn Hi Ch asy
tut
Ba ste tepec lag
kti
We tal u Ma
n Inu
Ta tea
a
Pla hé alam nadia
ech
rep
Ac lay rn Ca
Ma ste a
d Pu
a ghlan
Ea mb
Ko repech Hi dham
Pu stern O'o
We no
ho
To masa
tl
Ma e
Es jam Nahua
An errero
Gu 'kmaq
Mi nnada
c
Ka ghur
ona
Uy wol Tot
Fai hland
c
Hig efol
Tel no Zapote
Da os
nya
Cajon
nka
Ma rlpiri
Wa
Au una
Yuc
Nii i
na
Tw rth Tan
No ne
a
Sia anakain onac
Um utla Tot
tec
Coy ya
nan
Erz ana Chi
Lal ite
Kan ke-Yate
Ino toat
Wan auz
Gag
pele
Sek rayu
Guinea)
Gua tujil
ua New
Tz'u de (Pap
Mensa
Xho it
atec
Itaw aan
Maz
Mab u-Yalanji Tecóatl
)
Kuk
uage
Jerónimo
San ali
al lang
Benga (individu
Oriy wake
Mau ave
Ank e
ea)
Guin
Terib
New
nga
Kwa a (Papua
Maiw lona Atta
Pamp (Ethiopia)
Male a
Girawpan Zapotec
Choa ya
Nkon
li
Soma ia
Saam cian
Valen lynes
Maske Grebo c
c
Northern
Zapote
adas Zapote
go Albarr
Mixtepec
Santo Domin
Bribri Zapotec
Ocotláni Naga
Angam n
Cheche
Triqui
Copala
Amanab Chinantec
Palantla ala-Rano-Atchin
Uripiv-Wa
Tumbuk
Waima
Matal
Iyo
Amuzgos Amuzgo
San Pedro
Pele-Ata
Siona
Yine
Keley-I Kallahan
Sabaot
Lhomi
Te
te
lc
in A
go
Ira Es N mha
ni pe ah ric
Lo an Pe ra uatl
nt
Pl Ic w Sa rsia o
W
au el xo n
es
an
tern Fatdie di n
ro tsc c
Fl Frisi es h
G em an e
Sw er ish
M ab man
rd La altese ian
tv
Es Latv ian
to
Li Fi ni ian
thua nn an
ish
Po nian
Cz lish
Sl
ec
Ba ov h
Co
An
va
atl Fr ria ak
cie
án en n
Sw
nt
Gr
ah
Ny Mix ch
ili
ee
k (to Sp anja e
(in
an
div No
14 ish
idu rth
al ern La 53)
lan Sa tin
gu mi
ag
Ki
gir Digoe)
Go yama
go
Ku VuPular
ps
njo
Ki
Ki ab
Malanyarw ku iny
yu
wi anda
Se
Ca
Ru na
sig Be
ura mb Po Kw ndi
n Du a
ko ere
ma (Zam mo
gat bia
Ag )
Ma
asi Ma Ilo ta
na
ko
Fu kond
lfu e
Ina He lde
bak he
no
Ki n
Rin Ba Seim sar
con tak
ada To at
We
Ma Bik ba
ste
cha ol
Me rn Nig
me
Tep nde (Si er Mochi
Fulfu
eto
err
tutl
a Cha Leonelde
ina
nte )
Efi c
Alu k
r
Ga
Mb Teso
Coa
Par unda
ana
tzospa
Gu n
n Mix
lay
Sw tec
Yam ati
Bro
oke
Bim ba
's Poi
nt PalMaran a
awa ao
Eas Pangas no
tern
Boninan
Pili tok
Tag pino
Mongo
alog
Ceb ndow
Hili uano
War
Kin gaynon
Mat ay (Phi aray-A
igsa
lipp
ines
lug
Cen Manobo)
tral
Mas Biko
bate l
Agu
san Mannyo
Agu obo
tayn
Wichí
Lham Caluyanuen
Bata
tés Noc n
Piapoco
k Sima
lung ten
Bata
Kobon
k Ang un
Bata kola
k Dair
Kalam
Mapudun
i
Ngam gun
NyakTai
yusa-Ngobay
Kaqchikel
nde
Obol
Turkish
Ikwereo
WaffHuitoto
Minica
a
Agarabi
Caquinte
Tuma Huli
-Irum
Kein
Benab u
ena
Aleka
Northern
Anggu
no Puebla Nahuatl
ruk Yali
Cotabato
Manobo
Sirian
Desan o
Central
Guana o Tunebo
Muinane
Piratap no
Barasana-Eduuyo
Gofa
ria
Carapa
na
Cashibo-C
Kire
acataibo
Waimah
Avaric
a
Macuna
Yau (Morob
Kuman (Papua
e Provinc
Numang e)
New Guinea)
gang
Highlan
d Oaxaca Chontal
Siroi
Daga
Koya
Sinhalese
Saniyo
Dedua -Hiyewe
Border
Suena Kuna
Zia
Northe
Tatuyo rn Pastaz
Adam
Timbe
Imbabura Highland
awa Fulful a Quichua
Quichua
Tezoa
tlán Mixte de
Hanga Hundi
Peñol
Binumarien
es Mixtec c
Kunimaipa
Limo
Aneme
s Kalinga
Wake
San
Safeyoka
Blas
South
Tairora Kuna
Mbay
North Tairora
Yurac
Guayabero
are
Weri
Central
Urarina
Aymara
Highland
Mag-antsi
Ayta
Pueb
WestKandawo
ern Boli la Nahuatl
Chiquihuitlán Mazatec
vian Guar
CopticFolopa
Luang
Bola
Avokaya
Wandala
Sundanese
Kenga
Kaiwá
Galela
Nadëb
Mbula
Sepik Iwam
Halia
Mokole
Lukpa
Wè Northern
Lote
South Giziga
Lampung Api
Bislama
Gumatj
Djambarrpuyngu
Central Mazahua
Duri
Barbacoan
Sino-Tibetan
Quechuan
Cariban
Mangrida
Arawakan
Altaic
Lower Sepik-Ramu
Oto-Manguean
Jivaroan
Nadahup
Yele
Mayan
Basque
Songhay
Cahuapanan
Matacoan
Na-Dene
Camsá
Teberan-Pawaian
Tacanan
Urarina
Mixe-Zoque
Macro-Ge
Zaparoan
Mosetenan
Niger-Congo
Tarascan
Awin-Pare
Waorani
unknown
Karkar-Yuri
Kuot
Left May
Peba-Yaguan
Tol
Trans-New Guinea
Guahiban
Huitotoan
West Bougainville
Yanomam
Nakh-Daghestanian
Huavean
Uru-Chipaya
Indo-European
East Bird's Head
Tucanoan
Baining-Taulil
Khoe-Kwadi
Oksapmin
Totonacan
Choco
Torricelli
Mande
Tai-Kadai
Tupian
Uralic
Ticuna
Araucanian
Candoshi
Kordofanian
Ok
Arauan
Sepik
Yawa
Central Sudanic
Yuracare
Pama-Nyungan
Yareban
Austro-Asiatic
Cofán
Gumuz
Algic
Austronesian
Guaicuruan
Senagi
Tequistlatecan
Paezan
Iroquoian
Chibchan
Korean
Zamucoan
Japanese
Kartvelian
Sulka
Border
Harakmbet
Dravidian
West Papuan
Misumalpan
Uto-Aztecan
Panoan
East Bougainville
Nambikuaran
Dagan
Chiquito
Eastern Sudanic
Afro-Asiatic
Dogon
East Geelvink Bay
Hmong-Mien
Cacua-Nukak
Eskimo-Aleut
Figure 4: Clustering of 1107 languages based on the average Jensen-Shannon divergence in past,
present, and future marking of their respective top markers. Each node is colored based on its family information. Languages with no record on WALS remained white. It can be seen that many small
clusters of nodes have the same color, which together with our quantitative evaluation supports that if
divergence of tense marking is low the languages are very likely to be genetically related.
Christodouloupoulos and Steedman, 2015; Lison
and Tiedemann, 2016).
5.1
Parallel corpora and annotation
projection
In general, parallel corpora are a resource of immense importance in natural language processing at least since Brown et al. (1993)’s work on
machine translation and they are widely used.
In addition to machine translation, other applications include typology (Asgari and Mofrad, 2016;
Malaviya et al., 2017) and paraphrase mining
(Bannard and Callison-Burch, 2005).
Annotation projection is a specific use of paral-
c
te
an
hin
qw C
e
Ira sila o im
i
U u nz
K oo ge
o
Kis
in
n
K en
hat
N uer ther a
o dC
N ou ny
S ri k ye hatin lan
Tig du mu a C igh
U u al H
M op rn se
tal
N aste ure e hon
E ad es C
M alin co nra a
B abas aa ár hin
T Naf ajaj C
u
m
e
ta
G aw es k
Ag
B urm ta
an
B alan rí
B akai o agay
B ore al C
Ay entr
C aca
M
n
Deg oa arí
Samaum te o
P aván ga
X alan
ya
ba
B san ne
U oo
tG
N im wes
K orth aa
N uw
K ossi am
M gang l
N usaa l
K asaa m
Pa tcha a
N ob ra
Bim war
ek
B i
tho
Lozako rn So
K uthe
So pedi a
Se wan
Ts yula ra ango
ba ax
D
h
Bam songian
glis
En
Xaa en yen
ch
ole
Armoris
Fren
Cre
M
ole
nd
Krioa Isla
Cre
Se afut
cian
B int Lu
ål
Sa
km sk
te
Vu kar ian Bo ynor
Ti weg ian N
Nor weg
Nor ish
Dan glish mani
En x Ro
Vla edish
3-) 00)
Sw banian banian
(145 15
Al eg Al eek (1100Gh ern Gr glish
lel corpora: a set of labels that is available for L1
is projected to L2 via alignment links within the
parallel corpus. L1 labels can either be obtained
through manual annotation or through an analysis module that may be available for L1 , but not
for L2 . We interpret label here broadly, including, e.g., part of speech labels, morphological tags
and segmentation boundaries, sense labels, mood
labels, event labels, syntactic analysis and coreference. We can only cite a small subset of papers using annotation projection published in the last two
decades: McEnery and Xiao (1999), Ide (2000),
Yarowsky et al. (2001), Xiao and McEnery (2002),
Diab and Resnik (2002), Hwa et al. (2005), Muk-
Mod dle En eole glish
Mid an Cr iol En
Haitilize Kr
Be a
Mob are
Farefnda
Ve mento
Papiaindrou ep
Ny -Lok
Arop am
Man nyan r
Ma'a Gudu
Mofu-e
Irigwyabí
ah
Ka hau Keny
Wa
ba
mbila
Tsikimroon Ma
Came a
Zarm
Suauzo
Nin b
Dogri en
é
Iu Mi
Madar
Lobi rn Bobo
the
Sou
Hanga
Zou (Nigeria)
Mak Chin
Tedim kabau
Minangu
Terman
Chin
Hakha rou
Adiouk
Hdi
do
Jur Mo Chinese
Min NanDaw
Hmong
Gun
Wa
e)
Parauk (macrolanguag
Malay
Javanese
o)
AchineseSenoufo
blic of Cong
Supyire
ocratic Repu
Mono (Dem
Mangseng
Lahu
c
Achang
Peñasco Mixte
Magdalena
Kouya
Miyobe
ní
Mbyá Guara ro
Eastern Karabo
Waama
Mündü
a
Nigeria Mambil
Konkomba
Kamwe
Tojolabal
Obo Manobo
Nakanai
Dan
Kara (Papua New Guinea)
Guinea Kpelle
Baatonum
Tsonga
Romanian
Croatian
Kutep
Japanese
Luang
Bola
Avokaya
Wandala
Sundanese
Kenga
Kaiwá
Galela
Nadëb
Mbula
Sepik Iwam
Halia
Mokole
Lukpa
Wè Northern
Lote
South Giziga
Lampung Api
Bislama
Gumatj
Djambarrpuyn
Central Mazah gu
ua
Duri
Gilbertese
Bariai
Tamil
Sio
Burarra
Tinputz
Bambam
Kono (Sier
Pinotepa ra Leone)
Toraja-SaNacional Mixt
ec
Ngawn 'dan
TachelhitChin
Ambulas
Merey
Chortí
Timne
Tawala
Souther
n
Ramoaa Samo
Kekchí ina
Chuuke
Kuanua se
Serbia
Marsh n
Mbukoallese
Jukun
Kuwa Takum
Chum ataay
Shillukburung
Silaca
Lachi yoapan
Isthmuxío ZapotMixtec
Izere s Zapot ec
ec
Gude
Weste
rn Pe
Mund
ani nan
Di
Ma i
Gapayoyao
Kimr paiwa Ifugao
Motu é
South
Anu ern
Verses marked in CRS
Verses marked in FIJ
crs:ti hwc:wen tcs:bin
crs:ti fij:qai tcs:bin tzo:laj
crs:ti tcs:bin
crs:ti hwc:wen tcs:bin tzo:laj
crs:ti fij:qai hwc:wen tcs:bin tzo:laj
crs:ti fij:qai tcs:bin
no_marker
Verses marked in HWC
crs:ti hwc:wen tcs:bin
crs:ti fij:qai tcs:bin tzo:laj
crs:ti tcs:bin
crs:ti hwc:wen tcs:bin tzo:laj
crs:ti fij:qai hwc:wen tcs:bin tzo:laj
crs:ti fij:qai tcs:bin
no_marker
Verses marked in TCS
crs:ti hwc:wen tcs:bin
crs:ti fij:qai tcs:bin tzo:laj
crs:ti tcs:bin
crs:ti hwc:wen tcs:bin tzo:laj
crs:ti fij:qai hwc:wen tcs:bin tzo:laj
crs:ti fij:qai tcs:bin
no_marker
Verses marked in TZO
crs:ti hwc:wen tcs:bin
crs:ti fij:qai tcs:bin tzo:laj
crs:ti tcs:bin
crs:ti hwc:wen tcs:bin tzo:laj
crs:ti fij:qai hwc:wen tcs:bin tzo:laj
crs:ti fij:qai tcs:bin
no_marker
Verses not marked in neither of languages
crs:ti hwc:wen tcs:bin
crs:ti fij:qai tcs:bin tzo:laj
crs:ti tcs:bin
crs:ti hwc:wen tcs:bin tzo:laj
crs:ti fij:qai hwc:wen tcs:bin tzo:laj
crs:ti fij:qai tcs:bin
no_marker
crs:ti hwc:wen tcs:bin
crs:ti fij:qai tcs:bin tzo:laj
crs:ti tcs:bin
crs:ti hwc:wen tcs:bin tzo:laj
crs:ti fij:qai hwc:wen tcs:bin tzo:laj
crs:ti fij:qai tcs:bin
no_marker
Figure 5: A map of past tense based on the largest clusters of verses with particular combinations of
the past tense pivots from Seychellois Creole (CRS), Fijian (FIJ), Hawaiian Creole (HWC), Torres Strait
Creole (TCS) and Tzotzil (TZO). For each of the five languages, we present a subfigure that highlights
the subset of verse clusters that are marked by the pivot of that language. The sixth subfigure highlights
verses not marked by any of the five pivots.
Verses marked in AFR
Verses marked in ISL
pap:ta
rro:hanona
pap:ta rro:hanona
afr:is isl:er pap:ta rro:hanona urd:
urd:
afr:is pap:ta rro:hanona
no_marker
Verses marked in PAP
pap:ta
rro:hanona
pap:ta rro:hanona
afr:is isl:er pap:ta rro:hanona urd:
urd:
afr:is pap:ta rro:hanona
no_marker
Verses marked in RRO
pap:ta
rro:hanona
pap:ta rro:hanona
afr:is isl:er pap:ta rro:hanona urd:
urd:
afr:is pap:ta rro:hanona
no_marker
Verses marked in URD
pap:ta
rro:hanona
pap:ta rro:hanona
afr:is isl:er pap:ta rro:hanona urd:
urd:
afr:is pap:ta rro:hanona
no_marker
Unmarked Verses
pap:ta
rro:hanona
pap:ta rro:hanona
afr:is isl:er pap:ta rro:hanona urd:
urd:
afr:is pap:ta rro:hanona
no_marker
pap:ta
rro:hanona
pap:ta rro:hanona
afr:is isl:er pap:ta rro:hanona urd:
urd:
afr:is pap:ta rro:hanona
no_marker
Figure 6: A map of present tense based on the largest clusters of verses with particular combinations
of the past tense pivots from Papiamento (PAP), Waima (RRO), Afrikaans (ARF), Urdu (URD) and
Icelandic (ISL). For each of the five languages, we present a subfigure that highlights the subset of verse
clusters that are marked by the pivot of that language. The sixth subfigure highlights verses not marked
by any of the five pivots.
Verses marked in KLV
msa:akan
quc:na
tpi:bai
tte:kani
klv:dereh msa:akan quc:na tpi:bai tte:kani
quc:na tpi:bai
no_marker
Verses marked in QUC
msa:akan
quc:na
tpi:bai
tte:kani
klv:dereh msa:akan quc:na tpi:bai tte:kani
quc:na tpi:bai
no_marker
Verses marked in TTE
msa:akan
quc:na
tpi:bai
tte:kani
klv:dereh msa:akan quc:na tpi:bai tte:kani
quc:na tpi:bai
no_marker
Verses marked in MSA
msa:akan
quc:na
tpi:bai
tte:kani
klv:dereh msa:akan quc:na tpi:bai tte:kani
quc:na tpi:bai
no_marker
Verses marked in TPI
msa:akan
quc:na
tpi:bai
tte:kani
klv:dereh msa:akan quc:na tpi:bai tte:kani
quc:na tpi:bai
no_marker
Unmarked Verses
msa:akan
quc:na
tpi:bai
tte:kani
klv:dereh msa:akan quc:na tpi:bai tte:kani
quc:na tpi:bai
no_marker
Figure 7: A map of future tense based on the largest clusters of verses with particular combinations
of the past tense pivots from Bwanabwana (TTE), Tok Pisin (TPI), Quiché (QUC), Malay (MSA) and
Maskelynes (KLV). For each of the five languages, we present a subfigure that highlights the subset of
verse clusters that are marked by the pivot of that language. The sixth subfigure highlights verses not
marked by any of the five pivots.
erjee et al. (2006), Padó and Lapata (2009), Das
and Petrov (2011), de Souza and Orăsan (2011),
Nordrum (2015), Marasović and Frank (2016) and
Agić et al. (2016).
Of particular relevance is work that projects
tense: Spreyer and Frank (2008), Xue et al.
(2013), Loaiciga et al. (2014), Zhang and Xue
(2014) and Friedrich and Gateva (2017).
In contrast to this previous work, the labels we
project in this paper are not the result of human annotation nor the result of the annotation computed
by an NLP analysis module. Instead we interpret
words in L1 as annotation labels (words like CRS
“ti” and TZO “laj”) and project these word annotation labels to another language L2 .
allel corpus, i.e., in a corpus that contains an order of magnitude more languages than parallel
corpora currently in use. We showed that SuperPivot performs well for the crosslingual analysis of the linguistic phenomenon of tense. We
produced analysis results for more than 1000 languages, conducting – to the best of our knowledge
– the largest crosslingual computational study performed to date. We extended existing methodology for leveraging parallel corpora for typological
analysis by overcoming a limiting assumption of
earlier work. We only require that a linguistic feature is overtly marked in a few of thousands of languages as opposed to requiring that it be marked in
all languages under investigation.
6
8
Discussion
Our motivation is not to develop a method that can
then be applied to many other corpora. Rather,
our motivation is that many of the more than 1000
languages in the Parallel Bible Corpus are lowresource and that providing a method for creating the first richly annotated corpus (through the
projection of annotation we propose) for many of
these languages is a significant contribution.
The original motivation for our approach is
provided by the work of the typologist Michael
Cysouw. He created the same type of annotation
as we, but he produced it manually whereas we use
automatic methods. But the structure of the annotation and its use in linguistic analysis is the same
as what we provide.
The basic idea of the utility of the final outcome of SuperPivot is that the 1163 languages all
richly annotate each other. As long as there are a
few among the 1163 languages that have a clear
marker for linguistic feature f , then this marker
can be projected to all other languages to richly
annotate them. For any linguistic feature, there is
a good chance that a few languages clearly mark
it. Of course, this small subset of languages will
be different for every linguistic feature.
Thus, even for extremely resource-poor languages for which at present no annotated resources
exist, SuperPivot will make available richly annotated corpora that should advance linguistic research on these languages.
7
Conclusion
We presented SuperPivot, an analysis method for
low-resource languages that occur in a superpar-
Future directions
There are at least two future directions that seem
promising to us.
• Creating a common map of tense along the
lines of Figure 5, but unifying the three tenses
• Addressing shortcomings of the way we
compute alignments: (i) generalizing character n-grams to more general features, so
that templates in templatic morphology, reduplication and other more complex manifestations of linguistic features can be captured;
(ii) use n-gram features of different lengths
to account for differences among languages,
e.g., shorter ones for Chinese, longer ones for
English; (iii) segmenting verses into clauses
and performing alignment not on the verse
level (which caused many errors in our experiments), but on the clause level instead; (iv)
using global information more effectively,
e.g., by extracting alignment features from
automatically induced bi- or multilingual lexicons.
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge financial support from
Volkswagenstiftung and fruitful discussions with
Fabienne Braune, Michael Cysouw, Alexander
Fraser, Annemarie Friedrich, Mohsen Mahdavi
Mazdeh, Mohammad R.K. Mofrad, Yadollah
Yaghoobzadeh, and Benjamin Roth. We are indebted to Michael Cysouw for the Parallel Bible
Corpus.
References
Željko Agić, Anders Johannsen, Barbara Plank,
Héctor Alonso Martı́nez, Natalie Schluter, and Anders Søgaard. 2016. Multilingual projection for
parsing truly low-resource languages. Transactions
of the Association for Computational Linguistics
4:301–312.
Judith L. Aissen. 1987.
Springer.
Tzotzil Clause Structure.
Joan L Bybee and Östen Dahl. 1989. The creation
of tense and aspect systems in the languages of the
world. John Benjamins Amsterdam.
George Casella and Roger L. Berger. 2008. Statistical
Inference. Thomson.
Christos Christodouloupoulos and Mark Steedman.
2015. A massively parallel corpus: the bible in
100 languages. Language resources and evaluation
49(2):375–395.
Roger W Andersen. 1990. Papiamentu tense-aspect,
with special attention to discourse. Pidgin and creole tense-mood-aspect systems pages 59–96.
Bernard Comrie. 1989. Language universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology. University of Chicago press.
Ehsaneddin Asgari and Mohammad R. K. Mofrad.
2016. Comparing fifty natural languages and twelve
genetic languages using word embedding language
divergence (WELD) as a quantitative measure of
language distance. In Workshop on Multilingual and
Cross-lingual Methods in NLP. pages 65–74.
William Croft. 2001. Radical construction grammar:
Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford
University Press on Demand.
Colin Bannard and Chris Callison-Burch. 2005. Paraphrasing with bilingual parallel corpora. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics. Association for
Computational Linguistics, pages 597–604.
Emily M Bender. 2009. Linguistically naı̈ve!= language independent: why nlp needs linguistic typology. In Proceedings of the EACL 2009 Workshop
on the Interaction between Linguistics and Computational Linguistics: Virtuous, Vicious or Vacuous?.
Association for Computational Linguistics, pages
26–32.
Emily M Bender. 2011. On achieving and evaluating
language-independence in nlp. Linguistic Issues in
Language Technology 6(3):1–26.
Steven Bird. 2006. Nltk: the natural language toolkit.
In Proceedings of the COLING/ACL on Interactive presentation sessions. Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 69–72.
Bernd Bohnet and Joakim Nivre. 2012. A transitionbased system for joint part-of-speech tagging and
labeled non-projective dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical
Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning. Association
for Computational Linguistics, pages 1455–1465.
Bernd Bohnet, Joakim Nivre, Igor Boguslavsky,
Richárd Farkas, Filip Ginter, and Jan Hajič. 2013.
Joint morphological and syntactic analysis for richly
inflected languages. Transactions of the Association
for Computational Linguistics 1:415–428.
Peter F Brown, Vincent J Della Pietra, Stephen A Della
Pietra, and Robert L Mercer. 1993. The mathematics of statistical machine translation: Parameter estimation. Computational linguistics 19(2):263–311.
William Croft. 2002. Typology and universals. Cambridge University Press.
William Croft and Keith T Poole. 2008. Inferring
universals from grammatical variation: Multidimensional scaling for typological analysis. Theoretical
linguistics 34(1):1–37.
Michael Cysouw. 2014. Inducing semantic roles. Perspectives on semantic roles pages 23–68.
Michael Cysouw and Bernhard Wälchli. 2007. Parallel texts: using translational equivalents in linguistic
typology. STUF-Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 60(2):95–99.
Östen Dahl. 1985. Tense and aspect systems. Basil
Blackwell.
Östen Dahl. 2000. Tense and Aspect in the Languages
of Europe. Walter de Gruyter.
Östen Dahl. 2007. From questionnaires to parallel corpora in typology. STUF-Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 60(2):172–181.
Östen Dahl. 2014. The perfect map: Investigating the
cross-linguistic distribution of tame categories in a
parallel corpus. Aggregating Dialectology, Typology, and Register Contents Analysis. Linguistic Variation in Text and Speech. Linguae & litterae 28:268–
289.
Dipanjan Das and Slav Petrov. 2011. Unsupervised
part-of-speech tagging with bilingual graph-based
projections. In The 49th Annual Meeting of the
Association for Computational Linguistics: Human
Language Technologies, Proceedings of the Conference, 19-24 June, 2011, Portland, Oregon, USA.
pages 600–609.
José Guilherme Camargo de Souza and Constantin
Orăsan. 2011. Can projected chains in parallel
corpora help coreference resolution?
In Discourse Anaphora and Anaphor Resolution Colloquium. Springer, pages 59–69.
Mona T. Diab and Philip Resnik. 2002. An unsupervised method for word sense tagging using parallel
corpora. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, July 6-12, 2002, Philadelphia, PA, USA.. pages
255–262.
Matthew S Dryer, David Gil, Bernard Comrie, Hagen
Jung, Claudia Schmidt, et al. 2005. The world atlas
of language structures. Oxford University Press.
Chris Dyer, Victor Chahuneau, and Noah A. Smith.
2013. A simple, fast, and effective reparameterization of IBM model 2. In Human Language Technologies: Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association of Computational Linguistics, Proceedings, June 9-14, 2013, Westin Peachtree
Plaza Hotel, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. pages 644–648.
Annemarie Friedrich and Damyana Gateva. 2017.
Classification of telicity using cross-linguistic annotation projection. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language
Processing. Association for Computational Linguistics, Copenhagen, Denmark, pages 2549–2555.
Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Martine Vanhove, and Peter Koch. 2007. Typological approaches to lexical
semantics. Linguistic typology 11(1):159–185.
Anoop Kunchukuttan and Pushpak Bhattacharyya.
2016. Faster decoding for subword level phrasebased smt between related languages. arXiv preprint
arXiv:1611.00354 .
Pierre Lison and Jörg Tiedemann. 2016. Opensubtitles2016: Extracting large parallel corpora from
movie and tv subtitles. In Proceedings of the 10th
International Conference on Language Resources
and Evaluation.
Sharid Loaiciga, Thomas Meyer, and Andrei PopescuBelis. 2014. English-french verb phrase alignment
in europarl for tense translation modeling. In The
Ninth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference. EPFL-CONF-198442.
Laurens van der Maaten and Geoffrey Hinton. 2008.
Visualizing data using t-sne. Journal of Machine
Learning Research 9(Nov):2579–2605.
Joseph H Greenberg. 1960. A quantitative approach
to the morphological typology of language. International journal of American linguistics 26(3):178–
194.
Chaitanya Malaviya, Graham Neubig, and Patrick Littell. 2017. Learning language representations for typology prediction. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language
Processing. Association for Computational Linguistics, Copenhagen, Denmark, pages 2519–2525.
Jan Hajič, Jan Hric, and Vladislav Kuboň. 2000. Machine translation of very close languages. In Proceedings of the sixth conference on Applied natural language processing. Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 7–12.
Ana Marasović and Anette Frank. 2016. Multilingual modal sense classification using a convolutional
neural network. In Workshop on Representation
Learning for NLP. pages 111–120.
Iren Hartmann, Martin Haspelmath, and Michael
Cysouw. 2014. Identifying semantic role clusters
and alignment types via microrole coexpression tendencies. Studies in Language. International Journal
sponsored by the Foundation ?Foundations of Language? 38(3):463–484.
Serge Heiden, Sophie Prévost, Benoit Habert, Helka
Folch, Serge Fleury, Gabriel Illouz, Pierre Lafon,
and Julien Nioche. 2000. Typtex: Inductive typological text classification by multivariate statistical
analysis for nlp systems tuning/evaluation. In Maria
Gavrilidou, George Carayannis, Stella Markantonatou, Stelios Piperidis, Gregory Stainhaouer (éds)
Second International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation. pages p–141.
Rebecca Hwa, Philip Resnik, Amy Weinberg, Clara
Cabezas, and Okan Kolak. 2005. Bootstrapping
parsers via syntactic projection across parallel texts.
Natural language engineering 11(03):311–325.
Nancy Ide. 2000. Cross-lingual sense determination:
Can it work?
Computers and the Humanities
34(1):223–234.
Stephen C Johnson. 1967. Hierarchical clustering
schemes. Psychometrika 32(3):241–254.
Thomas Mayer and Michael Cysouw. 2014. Creating a massively parallel bible corpus. Oceania
135(273):40.
Ryan T McDonald, Joakim Nivre, Yvonne QuirmbachBrundage, Yoav Goldberg, Dipanjan Das, Kuzman
Ganchev, Keith B Hall, Slav Petrov, Hao Zhang, Oscar Täckström, et al. 2013. Universal dependency
annotation for multilingual parsing. In ACL (2).
pages 92–97.
Tony McEnery and Richard Xiao. 1999. Domains, text
types, aspect marking and english-chinese translation. Languages in Contrast 2(2):211–229.
John H McWhorter. 2005. Defining creole. Oxford
University Press.
Rada Mihalcea and Michel Simard. 2005. Parallel
texts. Natural Language Engineering 11(03):239–
246.
Amitabha Mukerjee, Ankit Soni, and Achla M Raina.
2006. Detecting complex predicates in hindi using
pos projection across parallel corpora. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Multiword Expressions:
Identifying and Exploiting Underlying Properties.
Association for Computational Linguistics, pages
28–35.
John Myhill and Myhill. 1992. Typological discourse
analysis: Quantitative approaches to the study of
linguistic function. Blackwell Oxford.
Lene Nordrum. 2015. Exploring spontaneous-event
marking though parallel corpora: Translating english ergative intransitive constructions into norwegian and swedish.
Languages in Contrast
15(2):230–250.
Sebastian Padó and Mirella Lapata. 2009. Crosslingual annotation projection for semantic roles.
J. Artif. Intell. Res. 36:307–340.
https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.2863.
Ari Pirkola. 2001. Morphological typology of languages for ir. Journal of Documentation 57(3):330–
348.
Philip Resnik. 2004. Exploiting hidden meanings: Using bilingual text for monolingual annotation. Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing pages 283–299.
Philip Resnik, Mari Broman Olsen, and Mona Diab.
1997. Creating a parallel corpus from the book of
2000 tongues. In Proceedings of the Text Encoding
Initiative 10th Anniversary User Conference (TEI10). Citeseer.
Gillian Sankoff. 1990. The grammaticalization of tense
and aspect in tok pisin and sranan. Language Variation and Change 2(03):295–312.
Marianne Elina Santaholma. 2007. Grammar sharing
techniques for rule-based multilingual nlp systems.
Proceedings of the 16th Nordic Conference of Computational Linguistics (NODALIDA) .
Diana Santos. 2004. Translation-based corpus studies: Contrasting English and Portuguese tense and
aspect systems. 50. Rodopi.
Devyani Sharma. 2009. Typological diversity in new
englishes. English World-Wide 30(2):170–195.
Jae Jung Song. 2014. Linguistic typology: Morphology
and syntax. Routledge.
Kathrin Spreyer and Anette Frank. 2008. Projectionbased acquisition of a temporal labeller. In IJCNLP.
pages 489–496.
Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 1978. On the expression of
spatio-temporal relations in language. Universals of
human language 3:369–400.
Bernhard Wälchli. 2010. The consonant template in
synchrony and diachrony. Baltic linguistics 1.
Bernhard Wälchli and Michael Cysouw. 2012. Lexical
typology through similarity semantics: Toward a semantic map of motion verbs. Linguistics 50(3):671–
710.
Lindsay J Whaley. 1996. Introduction to typology: the
unity and diversity of language. Sage Publications.
RZ Xiao and AM McEnery. 2002. A corpus-based approach to tense and aspect in english-chinese translation. In The 1st International Symposium on Contrastive and Translation Studies between Chinese
and English.
Nianwen Xue, Yuchen Zhang, and Yaqin Yang.
2013.
Distant annotation of chinese tense
and modality.
In Workshop on Annotation of
Modal Meaning in Natural Language (WAMM).
Association for Computational Linguistics,
pages 47–55.
http://aclanthology.coli.unisaarland.de/pdf/W/W13/W13-0307.pdf.
David Yarowsky, Grace Ngai, and Richard Wicentowski. 2001. Inducing multilingual text analysis
tools via robust projection across aligned corpora.
In Proceedings of the first international conference
on Human language technology research. Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 1–8.
Yuchen Zhang and Nianwen Xue. 2014. Automatic inference of the tense of chinese events using implicit
linguistic information. In Proceedings of the 2014
Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). Association for Computational Linguistics, Doha, Qatar, pages 1902–
1911. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D14-1204.
| 2cs.AI
|
1
Nonsubsampled Graph Filter Banks and Distributed
Implementation
Junzheng Jiang, Cheng Cheng, and Qiyu Sun
arXiv:1709.04107v1 [cs.IT] 13 Sep 2017
Abstract
In this paper, we consider nonsubsampled graph filter banks (NSGFBs) to process data on a graph in a
distributed manner. Given an analysis filter bank with small bandwidth, we propose algebraic and optimization
methods of constructing synthesis filter banks such that the corresponding NSGFBs provide a perfect signal
reconstruction in the noiseless setting. Moreover, we prove that the proposed NSGFBs can control the resonance
effect in the presence of bounded noise and they can limit the influence of shot noise primarily to a small
neighborhood of its location on the graph. For an NSGFB on a graph of large size, a distributed implementation
has a significant advantage, since data processing and communication demands for the agent at each vertex depend
mainly on its neighboring topology. In this paper, we propose an iterative distributed algorithm to implement the
proposed NSGFBs. Based on NSGFBs, we also develop a distributed denoising technique which is demonstrated
to have satisfactory performance on noise suppression.
Keywords: Graph signal processing, Graph filter bank, Distributed algorithm, Noise suppression,
Random geometric graph, Laplacian matrix.
I. Introduction
Spatially distributed networks (SDNs) have an agent at each location equipped with some data processing
and communication abilities, and they have been widely used in wireless sensor networks, power grids
and many real world applications ([1]–[5]). Data collected by an SDN resides naturally on vertices of
a graph. Graph signal processing provides an innovative framework to process data on graphs. Many
concepts, such as the Fourier transform, wavelet transform and filter banks, in classical signal processing,
have been extended to graph settings in recent years. However there are still lots of fundamental problems
unexplored or not completely answered ([6]–[11]).
The wavelet transform is one of the most prominent techniques to process signals in regular domains
([12]–[14]). During the past decades, graph wavelet transforms have been introduced and some of them are
designed using the eigenvalue and eigenspace information of the graph Laplacian matrix ([15]–[19]). Graph
wavelet transform is under the same theoretical structure with graph filter banks and the corresponding
wavelet filter bank carries a down and up-sampling procedure ([7], [8], [20]–[27]). Several forms of
the down and up-sampling procedure have been defined by the partitioned graph coloring in [20], the
maximum spanning tree structure of the graph in [25], and the SVD decomposition of the graph Laplacian
matrix in [26]. A proper definition of the down and up-sampling procedure is not obvious especially when
the residing graph is of large size and complicated topological structure. This motivates us to consider a
nonsubsampled graph filter bank (NSGFB) that contains an analysis filter bank (H0 , H1 ) and a synthesis
filter bank (G0 , G1 ), see Figure 1 for its block diagram. The analysis filter bank decomposes a graph
signal into two components carrying different frequency information. The nonsubsampled structure in an
NSGFB greatly simplifies the design of analysis filter banks for spectral decomposition and synthesis
filter banks for signal reconstruction.
Jiang is with the School of Information and Communication, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541004, China; Cheng is
with the Department of Mathematics, Duke University, and Statistical and Applied Mathematical Sciences Institute (SAMSI), Durham, NC
27708; and Sun is with the Department of Mathematics, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida 32816. Emails: [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]. This work is partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant
No. 61761011), SAMSI under the National Science Foundation (DMS-1638521), and the National Science Foundation (DMS-1412413).
2
Fig. 1. Block diagram of an NSGFB with analysis filter bank (H0 , H1 ) and synthesis filter bank (G0 , G1 ), where x is the input of the
NSGFB and x̃ is its output.
Filter banks can be implemented either in a centralized system or a cooperative decentralized (distributed) system. In a centralized system, a central facility receives data from agents at vertices, performs
designed data processing and sends the processed data back to agents at vertices. In a decentralized system,
the agent at each vertex has certain data processing ability to perform designed data processing, and data
collected from an agent at each vertex is shared only with neighboring vertices. Most filter banks on graphs
are designed for centralized processing, however for the implementation of filter banks on a graph of large
size, a centralized system may suffer from high computational burden and call for significant efforts to
create a data exchange network. For signal processing on an SDN or a graph of large size, a distributed
implementation provides an indispensable tool. It has been used for signal sampling and reconstruction on
an SDN in [5], graph signal inpainting in [28] and economic dispatch in power networks [29]. The reader
may refer to [5], [28]–[34] and references therein on distributed implementation of signal processing on
graphs. In a distributed implementation of the analysis and synthesis procedures of an NSGFB, signal
information on each vertex is transmitted only to neighboring vertices, which dramatically reduces the
computational cost and calls for low energy consumption. In this paper, we study NSGFBs on a cooperative
decentralized system from design to distributed implementation, and then to distributed signal denoising.
A. Main contributions
An important concept for an NSGFB is the perfect reconstruction condition, i.e., the output x̃ in Figure
1 is always the same as the input x, which can be characterized by the following matrix equation,
G0 H0 + G1 H1 = I,
(I.1)
where (H0 , H1 ) and (G0 , G1 ) are its analysis and synthesis filter bank respectively. Given an analysis
filter bank, the existence of synthesis filter banks is theoretically guaranteed so that the corresponding
NSGFB satisfies the perfect reconstruction condition (I.1) ([13], [14]). The first contribution of this paper
is that we introduce two methods to construct localized synthesis filter banks. In the first approach, the
synthesis filter bank is obtained by solving a Bezout identity for polynomials. Its bandwidth could be no
larger than the bandwidth of the analysis filter bank. In the second approach, the synthesis filter bank is
the solution of a constrained optimization problem. It does not necessarily have small bandwidth, however
it has an exponential off-diagonal decay. Consequently, the output of the corresponding localized NSGFB
suffers primarily in a small neighborhood of vertices where agents lose data processing ability and/or
communication capability.
In some real world applications of an NSGFB, the input x is the original signal xo corrupted by an
additive noise . In addition, the subband signals z0 = H0 x and z1 = H1 x are usually processed via some
(non)linear procedure, such as hard/soft thresholding and quantization. Then the output
x̃ = G0 Ψ0 (H0 (xo + )) + G1 Ψ1 (H1 (xo + ))
(I.2)
of the NSGFB is no longer the original signal xo , where is the input noise, and Ψ0 , Ψ1 are subband
processing operators. The robustness of an NSGFB is of paramount importance. For an SDN, an agent at
each vertex operates almost independently and the noise that arises at each vertex of the graph is usually
contained in some range [5]. So we may use a bounded determinstic/random noise model for NSGFBs on
a distributed system. A reasonable fidelity measure to assess the robustness of an NSGFB is the bounded
3
difference kx̃ − xo k∞ , instead of the conventional least squares error kx̃ − xo k2 , between the original
signal xo and the output signal x̃ ([5], [35], [36]). Here for 1 ≤ p ≤ ∞, `p is the space of all p-summable
sequences with norm k · kp . The second contribution of this paper is that for the NSGFB with analysis
filter bank having small bandwidth and synthesis filter banks obtained from our approaches, we establish
a quantitative estimate on the bounded difference kx̃ − xo k∞ , which is independent on the size of the
graph G. This indicates that the proposed NSGFB can control the resonance effect in the presence of
bounded additive noises.
For an NSGFB on a graph of large size, a distributed implementation may provide an indispensable
tool. The third contribution of this paper is that we propose an iterative distributed algorithm to implement
the synthesis procedure of an NSGFB rather than finding the synthesis filter bank explicitly. The keys
behind the algorithm are the decomposition (II.1) that splits the whole residing graph into a family of
overlapping subgraphs of appropriate size, and an observation that solutions of some global optimization
problem can be locally approximated by solutions of local optimization problems, when the objective
function and constraints are well localized [5]. As an application of NSGFBs, we develop a distributed
denoising technique that has satisfactory performance on noise suppression.
B. Organization
In Section II, we briefly review some fundamental concepts of graphs and introduce an overlapping graph
decomposition (II.1). In Section III, we introduce the concept of graph filters on `p , 1 ≤ p ≤ ∞, and show
that bounded filters with finite bandwidth are graph filters on `p , see Definition III.1 and Proposition III.3.
In Section IV, we discuss the analysis filter bank (H0 , H1 ) of an NSGFB which are required to have small
bandwidth, to pass/block the normalized constant signal, and to have stability on `2 , see Assumptions IV.1,
IV.2 and IV.4. We show that analysis filter banks have stability on `p for all 1 ≤ p ≤ ∞, with an estimate
on their lower and upper `p -stability bounds independent on the size of the graph, see Theorem IV.6. In
Section V, we propose an algebraic design of synthesis filter banks (G0 , G1 ) when analysis filters H0 and
H1 are polynomials of the symmetric normalized Laplacian on the graph, see Theorem V.1. In Section VI,
we consider the construction of synthesis filter banks (G0 , G1 ) by solving the constrained optimization
problem (VI.1) and (VI.2) with the objective function consisting of Frobenius norms of G0 and G1 , see
(VI.4) and Theorem VI.1. In Section VII, we propose an exponentially convergent iterative algorithm
(VII.9) and (VII.10) to implement the synthesis procedure, where each iteration can be implemented in
a distributed manner, see Theorem VII.2 and Algorithm VII.1. In Section VIII, we create a distributed
denoising technique associated with spline NSGFBs, see Figure 5, and demonstrate its performance for
signal denoising on graphs of large size. All proofs are collected in the appendices.
C. Notation
We use the common convention of representing matrices and vectors with bold letters and scalars
with normal letters. For a matrix A, denote its transpose, trace, Frobenius norm and operator norm on
`p , 1 ≤ p ≤ ∞, by AT , tr(A), kAkF and kAkBp respectively. For a graph G, denote its adjacency matrix
and degree matrix by AG and DG respectively, and define its Laplacian matrix by LG := DG − AG and
−1/2
−1/2
its symmetric normalized Laplacian matrix by Lsym
:= DG LG DG . For a scalar t, let sgn(t), btc
G
and t+ be its sign, integral part and positive part respectively, and t be the vector of appropriate size
with all entries taking value t. For a set F , denote its cardinality and indicator function by #F and χF
respectively.
II. P RELIMINARIES ON GRAPHS
Let G := (V, E) be a graph, where V = {1, 2, · · · , N } is the set of vertices and E is the set of edges
([5], [6]). For the distributed implementation of an NSGFB, we require that the residing graph G has
certain global features.
4
Assumption II.1. Throughout the paper, we consider simple graphs G, i.e., they are undirected and
unweighted, and they do not contain self-loops and multiple edges.
Take r ≥ 0. For a graph G = (V, E) satisfying Assumption
II.1, we define the r-neighborhood and
the r-neighboring subgraph of i ∈ V by B(i, r) := j ∈ V : ρ(i, j) ≤ r and Gi,r := B(i, r), E(i, r)
respectively, where E(i, r) contains all edges of the graph G with endpoints in B(i, r), and ρ(i, j) is the
geodesic distance between vertices i and j in V . Then for r ≥ 1, we can decompose the graph G into a
family of overlapping subgraphs Gi,r , i ∈ V , of diameters at most 2r,
G = ∪i∈V Gi,r .
(II.1)
For distributed implementation for an NSGFB, we presume that numbers of vertices in the r-neighborhood
of any vertex are dominated by a polynomial about r.
Assumption II.2. Throughout the paper, we consider graphs G with the counting measure µ having
polynomial growth, i.e., there exist positive constants D1 (G) and d such that
µ(B(i, r)) ≤ D1 (G)(r + 1)d
(II.2)
for all i ∈ V and r ≥ 0, where µ(F ) := #F for all F ⊂ V .
The minimal constants d and D1 (G) in (II.2) are called as Beurling dimension and density of the graph
G respectively [5].
The decomposition (II.1) plays a crucial role in the proposed distributed implementation for an NSGFB,
and the selection of the radius parameter r in (II.1) depends on Beurling dimension d and density D1 (G)
of the graph G, see Theorem VII.2. Accordingly, we expect that the Beurling dimension d and density
D1 (G) of the graph G are much smaller than (or even independent on) the size of the graph, which
implies that the graph G should be sparse. Shown in Figure 2 are two representative graphs that satisfy
Assumptions II.1 and II.2:
• The Minnesota traffic graph with 2642 vertices, where each vertex represents a spatial location in
the state of Minnesota equipped with a traffic monitoring sensor and each edge denotes a direct
communication link between monitoring sensors ([20], [21]).
• The random geometric graph RGGN with N vertices randomly deployed in the√
region [0, 1]2 and an
edge existing between two vertices if their physical distance is not larger than 2N −1/2 ([26], [37],
[38]).
Fig. 2. Plotted on the left is the Minnesota traffic graph that has Beurling dimension 2 and density 2.1378. On the right is a random
geometric graph with N = 4096, which has Beurling dimension 2 and density 3.0775.
5
III. G RAPH SIGNAL AND FILTERING
Let G = (V, E) satisfy Assumptions II.1 and II.2. A signal x residing on the graph G is a vector
(xi )i∈V , where xi refers to the signal value at vertex i ∈ V . In SDNs and many real world applications,
data collected belongs to some sequence space `p , 1 ≤ p ≤ ∞ ([5], [35], [36]).
A filter A on the graph G is a linear transformation from one signal x on G to another signal y = Ax
on G, which is usually represented by a matrix A = (a(i, j))i,j∈V . A filter A is expected to map a signal
with finite energy to another signal with finite energy and a bounded signal to another bounded signal. A
quantitative description of the above filtering procedure is
kAxkp ≤ Ckxkp for all x ∈ `p ,
(III.1)
where 1 ≤ p ≤ ∞ and C is a positive constant.
Definition III.1. Let 1 ≤ p ≤ ∞. We say that A is a graph filter on `p if (III.1) is satisfied, and we call
the minimal constant C for (III.1) to hold, denoted by kAkBp , the filter bound on `p .
In some
P practical applications ([8], [20], [21], [22], [26], [39]), a graph filter A is a polynomial
P (t) := Ll=0 pl tl of the symmetric normalized Laplacian Lsym
on G, i.e.,
G
A=
P (Lsym
G )
= p0 I +
L
X
l
pl (Lsym
G ).
(III.2)
l=1
Let 0 ≤ λ1 ≤ λ2 ≤ · · · ≤ λN ≤ 2 be eigenvalues of the symmetric normalized Laplacian Lsym
and write
G
Lsym
= UT Λ U,
G
(III.3)
where UT = [u1 , . . . , uN ] is an orthogonal matrix and Λ = diag(λ1 , . . . , λN ) is a diagonal matrix. Then
Λ)U,
A = UT P (Λ
(III.4)
and the filter bound kAkB2 can be evaluated explicitly,
kAkB2 = sup |P (λn )| ≤ sup |P (t)|.
(III.5)
0≤t≤2
1≤n≤N
To estimate kAkBp , p 6= 2, of a graph filter A = (a(i, j))i,j∈V , we define the bound of A by
kAk∞ = sup |a(i, j)|.
(III.6)
i,j∈V
A graph filter A on `p , 1 ≤ p ≤ ∞, has bounded entries and
kAk∞ ≤ sup kAej kp ≤ kAkBp , 1 ≤ p ≤ ∞,
(III.7)
j∈V
where the last inequality is obtained from (III.1) by replacing x by the standard unit vector ej with j-th
component taking value one while all others are zero.
For the distributed implementation for an NSGFB, bounded filters with finite bandwidth will be used
as analysis filters, see Assumption IV.1.
Definition III.2. The bandwidth σ := σ(A) of a graph filter A = (a(i, j))i,j∈V is the minimal nonnegative
integer such that a(i, j) = 0 for all i, j ∈ V with ρ(i, j) > σ. For a filter pair (A, B), we define its
bandwidth σ := σ(A, B) by max(σ(A), σ(B)).
In the following proposition, we show that a bounded filter with finite bandwidth is a graph filter on
`p , 1 ≤ p ≤ ∞, with filter bound dominated by some constant, independent of the size of the graph G.
6
Proposition III.3. Let 1 ≤ p ≤ ∞, and G be a graph satisfying Assumptions II.1 and II.2. Then for any
bounded graph filter A with bandwidth σ, we have
kAk∞ ≤ kAkBp ≤ D1 (G)(σ + 1)d kAk∞ ,
(III.8)
where d and D1 (G) are the Beurling dimension and density of the graph G respectively.
spln
For n ≥ 1, we define spline filters Hspln
0,n and H1,n of order n by
n
1
1 sym n
spln
sym
spln
and H1,n =
L
,
H0,n = I − LG
2
2 G
(III.9)
spln
see [39] in circulant graph setting. Spline filters Hspln
0,n and H1,n , n ≥ 1, have bandwidth n and their filter
bounds on `2 dominated by one, i.e.,
kHspln
l,n kB2 ≤ 1, l = 0, 1.
(III.10)
For p 6= 2, we obtain from Proposition III.3 that
spln n
spln
d
n
kHspln
l,n kBp ≤ kHl,1 kBp ≤ 2 D1 (G)kHl,1 k∞ )
= 2d−1 D1 (G))n , l = 0, 1,
(III.11)
where d and D1 (G) are the Beurling dimension and density of the graph G respectively. Therefore our
spln
p
representative spline filters Hspln
0,n and H1,n , n ≥ 1, are graph filters on ` , 1 ≤ p ≤ ∞, with filter bounds
dominated by some constants independent of the size of the graph G.
IV. A NALYSIS FILTER BANKS
The analysis filter bank decomposes the input signal on a graph into two components carrying frequency
information. In this section, we design the analysis filter bank (H0 , H1 ) of an NSGFB to have small
bandwidth, to pass/block the normalized constant signal, and to have stability on `2 , see Assumptions
IV.1, IV.2 and IV.4. In this section, we also show that analysis filter banks have stability on `p for all
1 ≤ p ≤ ∞, with an estimate on their lower and upper `p -stability bounds independent of the size of the
graph, see Theorem IV.6.
Let G = (V, E) be a graph satisfying Assumptions II.1 and II.2, and (H0 , H1 ) be the analysis filter
bank of an NSGFB. For the distributed implementation of an NSGFB, we make the following assumption
for its analysis filter bank (H0 , H1 ).
Assumption IV.1. The analysis filter bank (H0 , H1 ) has bandwidth σ ≥ 1.
Given an input graph signal x = (xi )i∈V , outputs of analysis procedure are
z0 = H0 x and z1 = H1 x.
(IV.1)
Write zl = (zl (i))i∈V and Hl = (hl (i, j))i,j∈V , l = 0, 1. Then it follows from (IV.1) and Assumption IV.1
that component values of the outputs z0 and z1 at each vertex k ∈ V are weighted sums of values of the
input x in a σ-neighborhood of k,
X
zl (k) =
hl (k, i)x(i), i ∈ V.
(IV.2)
ρ(i,k)≤σ
Thus the analysis procedure of an NSGFB can be implemented in a distributed manner.
To apply an NSGFB to some real world applications, such as noise suppression and abnormal phenomenon detection, its analysis filter bank should constitute certain spectral decomposition ([20], [21],
[23], [45]). Throughout the paper, we also make the following assumption for the analysis filter bank
(H0 , H1 ).
7
1/2
Assumption IV.2. The filter H0 passes the normalized constant signal DG 1, and the filter H1 blocks
1/2
the normalized constant signal DG 1, i.e.,
1/2
1/2
1/2
H0 DG 1 = DG 1 and H1 DG 1 = 0.
(IV.3)
The frequency partition of an analysis filter bank on an arbitrary graph G is not as obvious as that in
classical setting. For the case that
sym
H0 = P0 (Lsym
G ) and H1 = P1 (LG )
(IV.4)
for some polynomials P0 and P1 , one may verify that Assumption IV.2 is satisfied if and only if
P0 (0) = 1 and P1 (0) = 0.
(IV.5)
1/2
The above equivalence follows from the fact that DG 1 is an eigenvector of the symmetric normalized
Laplacian Lsym
associated with eigenvalue zero.
G
spln
n
The spline filter banks (Hspln
0,n , H1,n ), n ≥ 1, are of the form (IV.4) with P0 (t) = (1 − t/2) and
P1 (t) = (t/2)n , and they satisfy Assumption IV.2 by (IV.5), i.e.,
1/2
1/2
1/2
spln
Hspln
0,n DG 1 = DG 1 and H1,n DG 1 = 0.
(IV.6)
Spline filter banks in the circulant graph setting are known in [39] as graph-spline wavelet transform.
spln
Shown in Figure 3 is local smoothing/blocking phenomenon of the spline filter bank (Hspln
0,2 , H1,2 ) to a
blockwise constant signal on the Minnesota traffic graph and a blockwise smooth signal on the random
geometric graph RGG4096 in Figure 2. It is observed that the lowpass filtered signal is very close to the
original signal except near the boundary between different blocks, and that the highpass filtered signal
essentially vanishes except around the region where the original signal exhibits sharp local variation.
Fig. 3. Plotted on the top (resp. at the bottom), from left to right, are the original signal x on the Minnesota traffic graph (resp. on the
spln
random geometric graph RGG4096 in Figure 2), the lowpass filtered signal Hspln
0,2 x and the highpass filtered signal H1,2 x. The signal x on
the top is a blockwise constant function that has only two values ±1 on three blocks with one block only containing a vertex ([20], [21]),
and the signal x at the bottom is a blockwise polynomial consisting of four strips and imposing the polynomial 0.5 − 2cx on the first and
third diagonal strips and 0.5 + c2x + c2y on the second and fourth strips respectively, where (cx , cy ) are the coordinates of vertices ([26]).
Robustness is a fundamental requirement in the context of filter bank to control the signal dynamic
range and to regulate the input noise. For the robustness of an NSGFB on `p , 1 ≤ p ≤ ∞, we introduce
stability of a graph filter pair on `p .
Definition IV.3. Let 1 ≤ p ≤ ∞. We say that (H0 , H1 ) is stable on `p if there are two positive constants
Cp and Dp such that
1/p
Cp kxkp ≤ kH0 xkpp + kH1 xkpp
≤ Dp kxkp
(IV.7)
8
hold for all x ∈ `p if 1 ≤ p < ∞, and
C∞ kxk∞ ≤ max(kH0 xk∞ , kH1 xk∞ ≤ D∞ kxk∞
(IV.8)
hold for all x ∈ `∞ if p = ∞. The optimal constants Cp and Dp for the inequalities in (IV.7) and (IV.8) to
hold are called as lower and upper stability bounds of the graph filter bank (H0 , H1 ) on `p respectively.
Given an NSGFB with the analysis filter bank (H0 , H1 ) and synthesis filter bank (G0 , G1 ) such that
the perfect reconstruction condition (I.1) holds, we have that
(kG0 k2B2 + kG1 k2B2 )−1 kxk22 ≤ kH0 xk22 + kH1 xk22
≤ (kH0 k2B2 + kH1 k2B2 )kxk22
hold for all x ∈ `2 . So throughout the paper, we assume that the analysis procedure is stable on `2 .
Assumption IV.4. The analysis filter bank (H0 , H1 ) is stable on `2 .
For any x ∈ `2 , direct calculation leads to
kH0 xk22 + kH1 xk22 = xT (HT0 H0 + HT1 H1 x.
(IV.9)
Thus we have the following characterization to Assumption IV.4.
Proposition IV.5. Let G satisfy Assumptions II.1 and II.2. Then (H0 , H1 ) satisfies Assumption IV.4 if
and only if H := HT0 H0 + HT1 H1 is positive definite. Moreover, the optimal constants C2 and D2 for
(IV.7) to hold can be evaluated by
C22 = (kH−1 kB2 )−1 and D22 = kHkB2 .
For graph filters H0 and H1 of the form (IV.4), we obtain from (III.3) that
Λ))2 + (P1 (Λ
Λ))2 U.
HT0 H0 + HT1 H1 = UT (P0 (Λ
(IV.10)
(IV.11)
Hence we can evaluate the optimal constants C2 and D2 for (IV.7) to hold explicitly:
inf (P0 (λm ))2 + (P1 (λm ))2
1≤m≤N
= inf kH0 xk22 + kH1 xk22 ≤ sup kH0 xk22 + kH1 xk22
kxk2 =1
2
kxk2 =1
2
= sup (P0 (λm )) + (Q0 (λm )) .
(IV.12)
1≤m≤N
Set Rn (t) = (1 − t/2)2n + (t/2)2n , n ≥ 1. Then
inf Rn (t) = 2−2n+1 and sup Rn (t) = 1.
0≤t≤2
(IV.13)
0≤t≤2
Taking P0 (t) = (1 − t/2)n and P1 (t) = (t/2)n in (IV.12) and applying (IV.13), we get
spln
spln T
spln
T
2−2n+1 kxk22 ≤ xT (Hspln
)
H
+
(H
)
H
0,n
0,n
1,n
1,n x
spln
2
2
2
= kHspln
0,n xk2 + kH1,n xk2 ≤ kxk2
(IV.14)
spln
for all x ∈ `2 . Therefore spline filter banks (Hspln
0,n , H1,n ) of order n ≥ 1 satisfy Assumption IV.4 with
lower bound 2−n+1/2 and upper bound 1 by (IV.12) and (IV.14).
Filters in a stable filter bank on `p are graph filters on `p , 1 ≤ p ≤ ∞. In the following theorem, we
show that analysis filter banks are stable on `p , 1 ≤ p ≤ ∞, with quantitative estimates on their lower
and upper stability bounds by some constants independent of the size of the graph.
9
Theorem IV.6. Let G be a graph satisfying Assumptions II.1 and II.2, H0 and H1 have bandwidth σ ≥ 1,
and set H := HT0 H0 + HT1 H1 . If (H0 , H1 ) is stable on `2 , then it is stable on `p for all 1 ≤ p ≤ ∞.
Moreover, we have the following estimates for its lower and upper stability bounds Cp and Dp :
1/2
kHkB2
Cp ≥
d+1
d!2 (D1 (G))2 (σ + 1)2d κd+2
and
1/2
Dp ≤ 2D1 (G)(σ + 1)d kHkB2 ,
(IV.15)
(IV.16)
where d and D1 (G) are the Beurling dimension and density of the graph G respectively, and
κ = kH−1 kB2 kHkB2
(IV.17)
is the condition number of the matrix H.
spln
p
Combining (IV.14) and Theorem IV.6, the spline filter banks (Hspln
0,n , H1,n ), n ≥ 1, are stable on ` , 1 ≤
p ≤ ∞, and their lower and upper stability bounds Cp and Dp satisfy
22(d+2)n−1 d!(n
1
≤ Cp ≤ Dp
+ 1)2d (D1 (G))2
≤ 2D1 (G)(n + 1)d+1 .
We finish this section with a remark on stability bounds of a graph filter bank on the space `2 and on
the spaces `p , p 6= 2.
Remark IV.7. For a finite graph G = (V, E), a stable filter bank (H0 , H1 ) on `2 is also stable on
`p , 1 ≤ p ≤ ∞, and the lower stability bounds C2 and Cp satisfy
N −|1/p−1/2| ≤
C2
≤ N |1/p−1/2| ,
Cp
(IV.18)
where N = #V is the size of the graph G. The above estimation is unfavorable when the graph G has
large size, however it cannot be improved if there is no restriction on the filter bank (H0 , H1 ). As our
analysis filter bank (H0 , H1 ) has small bandwidth σ, we obtain the following estimate independent of the
size N of the graph G from Proposition IV.5 and Theorem IV.6,
1
C2
≤
≤ d!2d+1 (D1 (G))2 (σ + 1)2d κd+3/2 ,
d
1/2
2D1 (G)(σ + 1) κ
Cp
(IV.19)
where κ is given in (IV.17). The reader may refer to [5] and [40]–[44] for historical remarks and various
estimates on the ratio between stability bounds on `p and `q , 1 ≤ p, q ≤ ∞, for matrices with certain
off-diagonal decay.
V. S YNTHESIS FILTER BANKS AND B EZOUT IDENTITY
Let G = (V, E) be a graph satisfying Assumptions II.1 and II.2, and (H0 , H1 ) be a graph filter bank
satisfying Assumptions IV.1, IV.2 and IV.4. In this section, we propose an algebraic method to construct
graph filters G0 and G1 so that the NSGFB with the analysis filter bank (H0 , H1 ) and synthesis filter
bank (G0 , G1 ) satisfies the perfect reconstruction condition (I.1) and the bandwidth of synthesis filter bank
(G0 , G1 ) is no larger than the bandwidth of the analysis filter bank (H0 , H1 ). The proposed approach
applies for filter banks (H0 , H1 ) being polynomials of the symmetric normalized Laplacian on the graph
G, i.e.,
sym
H0 = P0 (Lsym
(V.1)
G ) and H1 = P1 (LG )
for some polynomials P0 and P1 .
10
Theorem V.1. Let G be a graph satisfying Assumptions II.1 and II.2, (H0 , H1 ) be a graph filter bank
satisfying Assumptions IV.1, IV.2 and IV.4 and being of the form (V.1), and let 0 ≤ λ1 ≤ λ2 ≤ · · · ≤
λN ≤ 2 be eigenvalues of the symmetric normalized Laplacian Lsym
G . If polynomials Q0 and Q1 satisfy
P0 (λm )Q0 (λm ) + P1 (λm )Q1 (λm ) = 1, 1 ≤ m ≤ N,
(V.2)
then the NSGFB with the analysis filter bank (H0 , H1 ) and synthesis filter bank (G0 , G1 ) satisfies the
perfect reconstruction condition (I.1), where
sym
G0 = Q0 (Lsym
G ) and G1 = Q1 (LG ).
1/2
(V.3)
1/2
1/2
The filter G0 in (V.3) passes the normalized constant signal DG 1, since G0 DG 1 = Q0 (0)DG 1 =
1/2
DG 1, where the last equation follows from (IV.5) and (V.2). However, the filter G1 in (V.3) may not
1/2
1/2
block the normalized constant signal, as G1 DG 1 = Q1 (0)DG 1 is not necessarily a zero signal. In this
case, we can construct a new synthesis filter bank by lifting,
e 0 = G0 + Q1 (0)H1 and G
e 1 = G1 − Q1 (0)H0 ,
G
(V.4)
e 0 D1/2 1 = D1/2 1 and G
e 1 D1/2 1 = 0.
which satisfies G
G
G
G
A strong version of (V.2) is the Bezout identity
P0 (z)Q0 (z) + P1 (z)Q1 (z) = 1, z ∈ C
(V.5)
for polynomials P0 , P1 , Q0 and Q1 . In the circulant graph setting, the above approach of constructing
synthesis filter banks via solving Bezout identity (V.5) was discussed in [39]. Comparing with the Bezout
identity (V.2) on the eigenvalue set of the symmetric normalized Laplacian matrix Lsym
G , the advantage
of the approach (V.5) provides a tool to design synthesis filter banks without a priori knowledge of
global topology of the residing graph and then it simplifies the design of synthesis filter banks for signal
reconstruction. It is well known that the Bezout identity (V.5) is solvable if and only if polynomials P0
and P1 have no common root. Moreover, there is a unique solution pair (Q0,B , Q1,B ) to the Bezout identity
(V.5) such that Q0,B (0) = 1, Q1,B (0) = 0 and the degree of Q0,B (resp. Q1,B ) is no larger than the degree
of P1 (resp. P0 ). Define
sym
G0,B = Q0,B (Lsym
(V.6)
G ) and G1,B = Q1,B (LG ).
Then the bandwidth of the synthesis filter bank (G0,B , G1,B ) is no larger than bandwidth of the analysis
filter bank (H0 , H1 ). Moreover, for any synthesis filter bank (G0 , G1 ) there exists a polynomial R such
that
sym
G0 = G0,B + R(Lsym
(V.7)
G )H1 and G1 = G1,B − R(LG )H0
satisfies the perfect reconstruction condition (I.1). We remark that the above polynomials R could be
appropriately chosen for real world applications of an NSFGB.
of order n ≥ 1 by
Following (V.6), we define synthesis spline filters GB,spln
and GB,spln
0,n
1,n
B,spln
B,spln
(Lsym
= Q1,n
(Lsym
GB,spln
= QB,spln
0,n
0,n
G ) and G1,n
G ),
where
QB,spln
(t)
0,n
n−1
X
2n − 1
t n−1−l t l
=
1−
2
2
l
l=0
2n − 1
t n
+
n−1
2
(V.8)
11
and
QB,spln
(t)
1,n
=
n−1
X
2n − 1 t n−1−l
l
2
2n − 1
t n
.
−
1−
2
n−1
l=0
1−
t l
2
1/2
blocks the
passes the normalized constant signal DG 1, the filter GB,spln
For n ≥ 1, the filter GB,spln
1,n
0,n
1/2
spln
normalized constant signal DG 1, and the NSGFB with the analysis spline bank (H0,n , Hspln
1,n ) and
B,spln
B,spln
synthesis filter bank (G0,n , G1,n ) satisfies the perfect reconstruction condition (I.1). The first two
B,spln
results follow from QB,spln
(0) = 1 and Q1,n
(0) = 0, while the perfect reconstruction conclusion holds
0,n
since
t n
t n B,spln
B,spln
1−
Q0,n (t) +
Q1,n
(t)
2
2
n−1
X
2n − 1
=
(1 − u)2n−1−l ul
l
l=0
n−1
X
2n − 1
+
(1 − u)l u2n−1−l
l
l=0
= ((1 − u) + u)2n−1 = 1,
where u = t/2.
In real world applications of an NSGFB such as the proposed distributed denoising in Section VIII,
the subband signals z0 and z1 in (IV.1) are processed via some (non)linear procedure, such as hard/soft
thresholding and quantization. In this case, the reconstructed signal x̃ is not necessarily the same as the
original signal x. In the following theorem, we show that the difference is mainly dominated by the error
caused by the subband processing.
Proposition V.2. Let the graph G, the analysis filter bank (H0 , H1 ) and the synthesis filter bank (G0 , G1 )
be as in Theorem V.1. Assume that the error caused by the subband processing Ψl on subband signals
zl = Hl x, l = 0, 1, is dominated by for any input signal x ∈ `p , i.e.,
kzl − Ψl (zl )kp ≤ , l = 0, 1,
(V.9)
where ≥ 0 and 1 ≤ p ≤ ∞. For the input signal x ∈ `p , the reconstructed signal x̃ = G0 Ψ0 (z0 ) +
G1 Ψ1 (z1 ) via the corresponding NSGFB belongs to `p as well. Moreover
kx̃ − xkp ≤ D1 (G)(σ̃ + 1)d (kG0 k∞ + |G1 k∞ ),
(V.10)
where d and D1 (G) are the Beurling dimension and density of the graph G respectively, and σ̃ is the
bandwidth of the synthesis filter bank (G0 , G1 ).
We finish this section with a distributed implementation of the NSGFB with analysis/synthesis filter
banks selected in Theorem V.1. Write Gl = (gl (i, j))i,j∈V , l = 0, 1. As the synthesis filters G0 and G1
have finite bandwidth σ̃, the synthesis procedure can be implemented in a distributed manner,
X
x̃k =
(g0 (k, j)z̃0 (j) + g1 (k, j)z̃1 (j)), k ∈ V,
(V.11)
ρ(j,k)≤σ̃
where x̃ = (x̃i )i∈V is the reconstructed signal and Ψl (zl ) = (z̃l (i))i∈V , l = 0, 1, are outputs of subband
processing. Hence values of the reconstructed signals x̃ at each vertex k ∈ V are weighted sums of
values of the subband processed outputs Ψ0 (z0 ) and Ψ1 (z1 ) in a σ̃-neighborhood of k ∈ V , cf. (IV.2) for
distributed implementation of the analysis procedure.
12
Our representative subband processing procedures Ψ are hard(soft) thresholding and uniform quantization. For those cases, the subband processing Ψ is of the form Ψ(z) = (ψ(zi ))i∈V for z = (zi )i∈V , where
ψ is the hard(soft) thresholding and uniform quantization function. Thus the subband processing can be
implemented in a distributed manner and the error resulted are bounded (i.e., (V.9) holds for p = ∞) by
the hard(soft) thresholding and quantization level. This together with (IV.2) and (V.11) implies that the
NSGFB with analysis/synthesis filter banks in Theorem V.1 can be implemented in a distributed manner
too, provided that the subband processing can be.
VI. S YNTHESIS FILTER BANK AND OPTIMIZATION
Let G = (V, E) be a graph satisfying Assumptions II.1 and II.2, and (H0 , H1 ) be a graph filter bank
satisfying Assumptions IV.1, IV.2 and IV.4. In this section, we consider the construction of synthesis filter
banks (G0 , G1 ) of an NSGFB by solving the minimization problem:
minimize kG0 k2F + kG1 k2F
(VI.1)
G0 ,G1
subject to the perfect reconstruction condition
G0 H0 + G1 H1 = I.
(VI.2)
Define the Lagrange function L of the constrained optimization problem (VI.1) and (VI.2) by
L(G0 , G1 , Θ ) = kG0 k2F + kG1 k2F
ΘT .
− tr (G0 H0 + G1 H1 − I)Θ
By direct calculation, we have
∂L
= 2G0 − Θ HT0
∂G0
∂L
= 2G1 − Θ HT1
∂G1
∂L
= G0 H0 + G1 H1
∂Θ
(VI.3)
− I.
Set H = HT0 H0 + HT1 H1 . Solving
∂L
∂L
∂L
=
=
=0
Θ
∂G0
∂G1
∂Θ
leads to the unique solution of the constrained optimization problem (VI.1) and (VI.2),
G0,L = H−1 HT0 and G1,L = H−1 HT1 .
(VI.4)
The synthesis filter bank (G0,L , G1,L ) in (VI.4) satisfies
G0,L H0 + G1,L H1 = I,
1/2
and the filter G0,L passes the normalized constant signal DG 1, since
1/2
1/2
1/2
G0,L DG 1 = H−1 (HT0 H0 + HT1 H1 )DG 1 = DG 1.
1/2
We remark that G1,L may not block the normalized constant signal DG 1.
For the case that H is a diagonal matrix, the synthesis filter bank (G0,L , G1,L ) in (VI.4) has the same
bandwidth as the analysis filter bank (H0 , H1 ), and
kH−1 kB2 kHl k∞ if ρ(i, j) ≤ σ
|gl,L (i, j)| ≤
(VI.5)
0
otherwise,
where Gl,L := gl,L (i, j))i,j∈V , l = 0, 1.
Let κ be the condition number of the matrix H in (IV.17). It is well known that κ > 1 when H is not
a diagonal matrix. For κ > 1, the synthesis filter bank (G0,L , G1,L ) in (VI.4) does not necessarily have a
small bandwidth, however it always has an exponential off-diagonal decay.
13
Theorem VI.1. Let G = (V, E) be a graph satisfying Assumptions II.1 and II.2, (H0 , H1 ) be a graph
filter bank satisfying Assumptions IV.1, IV.2 and IV.4, κ be the condition number of the matrix H :=
HT0 H0 + HT1 H1 , and let Gl,L := gl,L (i, j))i,j∈V , l = 0, 1, be as in (VI.4). Assume that κ > 1, then
|gl,L (i, j)| ≤ D1 (G)(σ + 1)d (1 − 1/κ)−1/2
θ
ρ(i, j)
(VI.6)
×kH−1 kB2 kHl k∞ exp −
2σ
hold for all i, j ∈ V and l = 0, 1, where θ = ln(κ/(κ − 1)), σ ≥ 1 is the bandwidth of the analysis filter
bank (H0 , H1 ), and d and D1 (G) are the Beurling dimension and density of the graph G respectively.
Remark VI.2. Agents located at some vertices may lose data processing ability and/or communication
capability. In that case, outputs of the analysis procedure of an NSGFB can be considered as being
corrupted by shot noise. The exponential off-diagonal decay property in Theorem VI.1 implies that the
reconstructed signal suffers mainly in their neighborhood of limited size. This means that the proposed
NSGFB can limit the influence of shot noise essentially to their small neighborhoods on the graph.
Remark VI.3. By the exponential off-diagonal decay property in Theorem VI.1, the synthesis filters
(G0,L , G1,L ) are filters on `p , 1 ≤ p ≤ ∞,
kGl,L kBp ≤ d!2d (D1 (G))2 (σ + 1)2d κd+1 (1 − 1/κ)−1/2
×kH−1 kB2 kHl k∞ , l = 0, 1.
(VI.7)
The above conclusion with p = ∞ indicates that the NSGFB does not have a resonance effect.
Applying similar argument used in the proof of Proposition V.2, we have
Corollary VI.4. Let G, (H0 , H1 ), (G0,L , G1,L ) be as in Theorem VI.1, and let p, Ψ0 , Ψ1 , be as in
Proposition V.2. Assume that the input signal x of the corresponding NSGFB belongs to `p , then the
reconstructed signal x̃ = G0,L Ψ0 (H0 x) + G1,L Ψ1 (H1 x) via the NSGFB belongs to `p and
kx̃ − xkp ≤ d!2d (D1 (G))2 (σ + 1)2d κd+1 kH−1 kB2
×(1 − 1/κ)−1/2 kH0 k∞ + kH1 k∞ ).
(VI.8)
Solving the constrainted optimization program (VI.1) and (VI.2) associated with the analysis spline
spln
L,spln
L,spln
filter banks (Hspln
0,n , H1,n ), we obtain the synthesis spline filter bank (G0,n , G1,n ), n ≥ 1, where
−1 spln
L,spln
spln 2
spln 2
Gl,n = H0,n + H1,n
Hl,n , l = 0, 1.
(VI.9)
L,spln
The synthesis spline filters GL,spln
and G1,n
, n ≥ 1, have full bandwidth, however they have exponential
0,n
L,spln
(i,
j))i,j∈V , l = 0, 1. By (VI.6) and Theorem VI.1, we obtain
off-diagonal decay. Write GL,spln
=
(g
l,n
l,n
that
L,spln
|gl,n
(i, j)| ≤ 23n−3/2 (22n−1 − 1)−1/2 (n + 1)d D1 (G)
ln(22n−1 /(22n−1 − 1))
ρ(i, j)
× exp −
2n
hold for all i, j ∈ V and l = 0, 1.
λ) to describe frequency response of a filter A = P (Lsym
By (III.4), we may use P (λ
G ) of the form
(III.2), where the vector λ = (λ1 , . . . , λN ) is composed of eigenvalues 0 ≤ λ1 ≤ λ2 ≤ · · · ≤ λN ≤ 2
of the symmetric normalized Laplacian Lsym
G . Shown in Figure 4 are frequency responses of the analysis
spln
spln
spline filter banks (H0,n , H1,n ) of order n, the synthesis spline filter banks (GB,spln
, GB,spln
) in (V.8),
0,n
1,n
L,spln
L,spln
and the synthesis spline filter banks (G0,n , G1,n ) just constructed, where n = 1, 2. It is observed
spln
that the frequency responses of analysis spline filter banks (Hspln
0,n , H1,n ) and synthesis spline filter
L,spln
L,spln
banks (G0,n , G1,n ) have certain complementary property, while the synthesis spline filter banks
(GB,spln
, GB,spln
) constructed via solving a Bezout identity do not.
0,n
1,n
14
Fig. 4. Plotted on the top (resp. at the bottom) are the frequency responses of analysis/synthesis spline filters of order n on the Minnesota
traffic graph (resp. on the random geoemetric graph RGG4096 in Figure 2), where n = 1 for the left figure and n = 2 for the right figure.
VII. I TERATIVE DISTRIBUTED ALGORITHM FOR SYNTHESIS PROCEDURE
For the NSGFB with synthesis filter banks in Theorem V.1, the distributed implementation of the
corresponding synthesis procedure has been discussed in (V.11).
For the NSGFB with the analysis filter bank (H0 , H1 ) and synthesis filter bank (G0,L , G1,L ) obtained
from solving the constrained optimization problem (VI.1) and (VI.2), output x̃ of the synthesis procedure
is
x̃ = G0,L z̃0 + G1,L z̃1 ,
(VII.1)
where z̃0 and z̃1 be outputs of subband processing. As filters G0,L and G1,L may have full bandwidth, it is
infeasible to evaluate G0,L z̃0 and G1,L z̃1 directly in a distributed manner. In this paper, we do not intend
to find synthesis filters G0,L and G1,L explicitly, instead we propose an iterative distributed algorithm to
implement the synthesis procedure (VII.1).
The proposed iterative distributed algorithm is based on two pivoting observations. The first observation
is that the output signal x̃ in (VII.1) is the unique solution of the following global least squares problem:
min kH0 x − z̃0 k22 + kH1 x − z̃1 k22 ,
x
(VII.2)
which follows from (VI.4). To solve the global optimization problem (VII.2) in a distributed manner, we
introduce a family of local least squares problems,
2
2r
2
min kH0 χ2r
k x − z̃0 k2 + kH1 χk x − z̃1 k2 , k ∈ V,
x
(VII.3)
where χrk , k ∈ V , are truncation operators defined by
χrk : (x(i))i∈V 7−→ x(i)χB(k,r) (i) i∈V ,
(VII.4)
and r ≥ 1 is a radius parameter to be determined later [5]. One may verify that given any k ∈ V , the
unique solution of the local optimization problem (VII.3) is given by
2r
2r −1 2r
vk,r = χ2r
χk (HT0 z̃0 + HT1 z̃1 ),
(VII.5)
k χk Hχk
where H = HT0 H0 + HT1 H1 . The second crucial observation is that the unique solution vk,r of the local
least squares problem (VII.3) in the (2r)-neighborhood of the vertex k provides a local approximation
15
to the solution x̃ of the global least squares problem (VII.2) in a r-neighborhood of the vertex k ∈ V .
Therefore we can patch vk,r , k ∈ V , together
X
−1 X
r
vr =
χk0
χrk vk,r
(VII.6)
k0 ∈V
k∈V
to generate an approximation to the solution x̃ of the global least squares problem (VII.2) in `p norm,
i.e., there exists δr,σ ∈ (0, 1) such that
kvr − x̃kp ≤ δr,σ kx̃kp
when the radius parameter r ≥ 1 is chosen appropriately. Set
X
−1 X
r
2r −1 2r
J=
χk 0
χrk (χ2r
k Hχk ) χk .
k0 ∈V
(VII.7)
(VII.8)
k∈V
Based on (VII.5), (VII.6) and (VII.7), we propose the following iterative distributed algorithm with initials
z̃0 , z̃1 ∈ `p :
(m−1)
(m−1)
v(m) = J(HT0 z̃0
+ HT1 z̃1
)
(m)
(m−1)
(m)
z̃0 = z̃0
− H0 v
(VII.9)
(m)
(m−1)
z̃1 = z̃1
− H1 v(m)
x(m) = x(m−1) + v(m)
for m ≥ 1, where
(0)
(0)
x(0) = 0, z̃0 = z̃0 , z̃1 = z̃1 .
(VII.10)
Remark VII.1. Decompose H = D + R into a diagonal component D and the remainder R. Then the
classical Jacobi method to solve the linear system Hx = HT0 z̃0 + HT1 z̃1 is
x(m) = D−1 (HT0 z̃0 + HT1 z̃1 − Rx(m−1) ), m ≥ 1.
(VII.11)
The above iterative method converges when H is diagonally dominated, which is not necessarily true for
the case in our setting. We observe that for r = 0, the matrix J in (VII.8) is equal to D−1 . Hence the
sequence x(m) , m ≥ 0, in the proposed algorithm (VII.9) and (VII.10) with r = 0 is the same as the one
in the Jacobi method (VII.11) with initial x(0) = 0.
Write Hl = (hl (i, j))i,j∈V and z̃l = (z̃l (i))i∈V , l = 0, 1. For the distributed implementation of the iterative algorithm (VII.9) and (VII.10), each agent k ∈ V is required to transmit information to its neighboring
vertices in B(k, 2r + 2σ), and to store the number mk = µ(B(k, r)) of its neighboring vertices in B(k, r)
e l,k = (hl (i, j))i∈B(k,2r+σ),j∈B(k,2r+2σ) , l = 0, 1.
and four matrices Hl,k = (hl (i, j))i∈B(k,2r+σ),j∈B(k,2r) and H
Shown in Algorithm VII.1 is a distributed implementation of the iterative algorithm (VII.9) and (VII.10),
where every vertex k ∈ V is required to store data of size O((r + σ)2d ), to perform O((r + σ)2d ) algebraic
manipulations in each iteration, and to transmit data to its (2r + 2σ)-neighborhood twice in each iteration.
In the next theorem, we further show that the iterative algorithm (VII.9) and (VII.10) converges
exponentially when r is appropriately selected.
Theorem VII.2. Let 1 ≤ p ≤ ∞, G be a graph satisfying Assumptions II.1 and II.2, (H0 , H1 ) be a graph
filter bank satisfying Assumptions IV.1, IV.2 and IV.4, κ > 1 be as (IV.17), the condition number of the
matrix H := HT0 H0 + HT1 H1 , and let (G0,L , G1,L ) be as in (VI.4). Set
θ
(D1 (G))2 (2σ + 1)d κ2
exp −
r (3r + 2σ + 1)d ,
(VII.12)
δr,σ :=
κ−1
2σ
16
Algorithm VII.1 Iterative Distributed Reconstruction Algorithm
Inputs: stop criterion ε and observations z̃l,k = (z̃l (i))i∈B(k,2r+σ) for l = 0, 1.
Operation: Compute Fk = HT0,k H0,k + HT1,k H1,k , find its inverse (Fk )−1 , and then compute Gl,L;k :=
(Fk )−1 HTl,k , l = 0, 1.
(0)
(0)
(0)
Initialization: xk = 0, z̃0,k = z̃0,k and z̃1,k = z̃1,k .
Iteration:
(m)
(m)
1) uk = G0,L;k z̃0,k + G1,L;k z̃1,k and write uk = (uk (i))i∈B(k,2r) .
2) Communicate to all P
vertices i ∈ B(k, r)\{k} to send data uk (i) and receive data ui (k).
3) Produce v(k) = m1k i∈B(k,r) ui (k).
4) Communicate to all vertices i ∈ B(k, 2r + 2σ)\{k} to send data v(k) and receive data v(i), and
then generate a vector vk = (v(i))i∈B(k,2r+2σ) .
(m+1)
(m)
(m+1)
(m)
e l,k vk , l = 0, 1.
5) Update xk
= xk + vk and z̃l,k
= z̃l,k − H
(m+1)
6) Evaluate kvk k∞ ≤ ε. If yes, terminate the iteration and output xk
. Otherwise, set m = m + 1.
(m+1)
Outputs: xk
.
where θ = ln(κ/(κ − 1)), σ ≥ 1 is the bandwidth of the analysis filter bank (H0 , H1 ), and d and D1 (G)
are the Beurling dimension and density of the graph G respectively. Take z̃0 , z̃1 ∈ `p , and let x(m) , m ≥ 0,
be as in (VII.9) and (VII.10). If the radius parameter r is so chosen that
δr,σ ∈ (0, 1),
(VII.13)
then x(m) , m ≥ 0, converges to the least squares solution x̃ in (VII.1) exponentially,
kx(m) − x̃kp ≤ (δr,σ )m kx̃kp , m ≥ 0.
(VII.14)
Remark VII.3. For l = 0, 1, we can apply (VII.9) to prove by induction on m that
(m)
z̃l
− (z̃l − Hl x̃) = −H0 (x(m) − x̃), m ≥ 0.
(m)
This together with Theorem VII.2 implies that z̃l , m ≥ 1, in the iterative algorithm (VII.9) and (VII.10)
converges to z̃l − Hl x̃ exponentially, where l = 0, 1.
By (VII.12) and (VII.14) in Theorem VII.2, the iterative distributed algorithm (VII.9) and (VII.10) has
fast convergence rate when a large radius parameter r is chosen. In that case, heavier burden arises at each
iteration, which implies that each vertex in the graph G should have more data storages, better computing
abilities and stronger communication capacities in real world applications. Shown in Tables I and II are
the average Em,r of kx(m) − xk∞ /kxk∞ over 50 trials versus the number m ≥ 1 of iterations and the
spln
radius parameter r ≥ 0, where (Hspln
0,n , H1,n ), n = 1, 2 are used as analysis filter banks, the signal x in
Tables I and II is randomly selected on the Minnesota traffic graph and on the random geometric graph
RGG4096 in Figure 2 respectively. This demonstrates that the iterative distributed algorithm (VII.9) and
(VII.10) converges faster for larger radius r, and the original signal can be well approximated in one step
when a large radius r is chosen, see Tables I and II.
By (VII.12) and Theorem VII.2, there is a radius parameter r0 such that the iterative distributed algorithm
(VII.9) and (VII.10) converges exponentially whenever r ≥ r0 . We can select the above radius parameter
r0 to be independent of the size of the graph G. Our simulation indicates that the iterative distributed
algorithm (VII.9) and (VII.10) with r = 0, i.e. the Jacobi iterative method by Remark VII.1, diverges for
some bounded inputs on the Minnesota traffic graph and on some random geometric graphs, see the first
column of Tables I and II.
17
TABLE I
P ERFORMANCE OF THE ITERATIVE DISTRIBUTED RECONSTRUCTION ALGORITHM TO RECOVER SIGNALS ON THE M INNESOTA TRAFFIC
GRAPH
n=1
Em,r r
m
1
2
3
4
5
10
Em,r r
m
1
2
3
4
5
7
10
14
0
.4155
.1355
.0547
.0226
.0098
.0002
1
.2220
.0238
.0039
.0006
.0000
.0000
n=2
2
3
4
6
.0375
.0007
.0000
.0000
.0000
.0000
.0160
.0001
.0000
.0000
.0000
.0000
.0033
.0000
.0000
.0000
.0000
.0000
.0003
.0000
.0000
.0000
.0000
.0000
0
1
2
3
4
6
1.1988
1.1662
1.4550
1.4697
2.5386
4.7083
12.7921
52.4168
.6563
.2315
.1162
.0567
.0296
.0082
.0013
.0001
.3187
.0518
.0125
.0026
.0006
.0000
.0000
.0000
.1523
.0136
.0017
.0002
.0000
.0000
.0000
.0000
.0725
.0029
.0002
.0000
.0000
.0000
.0000
.0000
.0178
.0002
.0000
.0000
.0000
.0000
.0000
.0000
TABLE II
P ERFORMANCE OF THE ITERATIVE DISTRIBUTED RECONSTRUCTION ALGORITHM TO RECOVER SIGNALS ON THE RANDOM GEOMETRIC
GRAPH RGG4096 IN F IGURE 2
n=1
Em,r r
m
1
2
3
4
10
19
Em,r r
m
1
2
3
4
5
8
0
.4182
.1963
.1143
.0699
.0050
.0001
1
.1301
.0083
.0008
.0000
.0000
.0000
n=2
2
3
4
5
.0156
.0002
.0000
.0000
.0000
.0000
.0035
.0000
.0000
.0000
.0000
.0000
.0006
.0000
.0000
.0000
.0000
.0000
.0001
.0000
.0000
.0000
.0000
.0000
0
1
2
3
4
5
1.5267
2.8586
6.6794
16.4089
40.9430
672.8632
.4674
.1098
.0374
.0121
.0041
.0002
.1487
.0120
.0014
.0002
.0000
.0000
.0437
.0011
.0000
.0000
.0000
.0000
.0159
.0001
.0000
.0000
.0000
.0000
.0049
.0000
.0000
.0000
.0000
.0000
VIII. D ISTRIBUTED DENOISING
Given an NSGFB with analysis filter bank (H0 , H1 ) and synthesis filter bank (G0 , G1 ), we propose a
denoising technique with hard thresholding operator Tτ applied to the high-pass subband signal, where
Tτ (t) = sgn(t)(|t| − τ )+ is the hard thresholding function with threshold value τ ≥ 0, cf. [26], [27], [45],
[46]. Presented in Figure 5 is the block diagram of the proposed denoising procedure. In this section, we
demonstrate the performance of the proposal denoising procedure associated with spline NSGFBs, which
can be implemented in a distributed manner.
18
Fig. 5. Block diagram of the proposed denoising procedure, where x is the noisy input and x̃ is the denoised output.
TABLE III
D ENOISING PERFORMANCE ON THE M INNESOTA TRAFFIC GRAPH MEASURED WITH THE STANDARD `2 -SNR
η
Input `2 -SNR
graphBior
OSGFB
PRT
NSGFB-B1
NSGFB-B2
NSGFB-L1
NSGFB-L2
1/32
34.89
34.43
38.25
35.31
37.50
37.25
38.49
37.25
1/16
28.85
28.91
32.59
29.41
31.45
30.74
32.44
30.67
1/8
22.83
24.06
24.44
23.74
25.43
24.95
26.42
24.91
1/4
16.82
18.21
16.70
18.46
18.91
18.53
19.25
18.16
1/2
10.81
12.79
12.54
15.45
13.18
13.32
13.82
13.33
1
4.75
7.39
4.69
12.77
7.39
7.68
8.34
7.88
In the simulations, the noisy input is
x = xo + ,
(VIII.1)
where xo = (xo,i )i∈V is the original graph signal and the noise = (i )i∈V has value i at vertex i ∈ V
spln
randomly selected in the range [−η, η]. The spline NSGFBs have analysis spline filter banks (Hspln
0,n , H1,n )
L,spln
in (III.9) and synthesis spline filter banks being either (GB,spln
, GB,spln
) in (V.8) or (G0,n
, GL,spln
0,n
1,n
1,n ) in
(VI.9), where n ≥ 1. They are abbreviated by NSGFB-Bn and NSGFB-Ln respectively. The denoising
procedure is performed by retaining the low-pass subband signal z0 = Hspln
0,n x and applying the hard threshspln
olding operation Tτ to the high-pass subband signal z1 = H1,n x, where τ > 0 is chosen appropriately.
Thus the denoised output is
x̃ = GB,spln
z0 + GB,spln
Tτ (z1 )
0,n
1,n
for NSGFB-Bn, and
L,spln
x̃ = GL,spln
0,n z0 + G1,n Tτ (z1 )
for NSGFB-Ln respectively, where n ≥ 1. For the above denoising procedure, we use 20 log10 kxo kp /kx−
xo kp to measure the input `p -signal-to-noise ratio (`p -SNR) in dB, and 20 log10 kxo kp /kx̃−xo kp to measure
the output `p -SNR in dB, where 1 ≤ p ≤ ∞.
The Minnesota traffic graph is a test bed for various techniques in signal processing on graphs of
medium size ([8], [20], [22], [26]). The denoising performance of the proposed spline NSGFBs on the
Minnesota graph is presented in Table III, where the original signal xo is the blockwise constant function
in Figure 3, the threshold value τ is selected to be 3η, and the input and output `2 -SNRs are the average
values over 50 trials. Shown also in Table III are the performance comparison with the biorthogonal
graph filter bank (graphBior) in [21], the M -channel oversampled graph filter bank (OSGFB) in [22], and
the pyramid transform (PRT) in [26], where the corresponding output `2 -SNRs are calculated from the
accompanying codes in these references. It indicates that the spline NSGFBs and the OSGFB outperform
other two methods in the small noise scenario, the spline NSGFBs have the best performance in the
moderate noise environment, and the PRT stands out from the rest in the strong noisy case.
Presented in Tables IV and V are the denoising performance of spline NSGFBs and the performance
comparision with the graphBior in [21], the OSGFB in [22], and the PRT in [26] on the random geometric
graph RGGN , where N = 4096, the original signal xo is the blockwise polynomial in Figure 3, the
threshold value τ is selected to be 3η, and the input and output `2 -SNRs in Table IV and the input and
19
TABLE IV
D ENOISING PERFORMANCE ON THE RANDOM GEOMETRIC GRAPH RGG4096
η
Input `2 -SNR
graphBior
OSGFB
PRT
NSGFB-B1
NSGFB-B2
NSGFB-L1
NSGFB-L2
1/32
35.06
33.82
31.69
32.89
37.43
36.65
38.86
36.08
1/16
29.04
28.61
26.37
27.51
31.40
30.63
32.87
29.97
1/8
23.02
23.27
20.79
22.44
25.34
24.89
26.61
24.27
1/4
17.01
18.20
16.40
17.70
19.31
19.37
20.45
19.16
MEASURED WITH THE STANDARD
1/2
10.97
13.21
13.40
14.21
13.47
13.80
14.91
13.92
TABLE V
D ENOISING PERFORMANCE ON THE RANDOM GEOMETRIC GRAPH RGG4096
η
Input `∞ -SNR
graphBior
OSGFB
PRT
NSGFB-B1
NSGFB-B2
NSGFB-L1
NSGFB-L2
1/32
34.90
23.45
20.59
23.24
31.84
26.86
29.28
24.66
1/16
28.88
17.28
14.32
17.25
25.16
20.34
22.70
17.91
1/8
22.85
11.12
6.83
11.27
18.71
14.67
16.19
12.27
1/4
16.83
5.34
0.99
5.43
11.05
8.32
9.28
6.72
1
4.95
8.34
11.13
11.81
7.62
8.25
9.40
9.05
MEASURED WITH THE
1/2
10.81
0.32
−1.99
0.39
6.55
3.55
4.08
0.48
`2 -SNR
`∞ -SNR
1
4.79
−4.00
−2.71
−2.15
2.60
1.67
0.35
−0.52
output `∞ -SNRs in Table V are the average values over 50 trials. It is observed that the spline NSGFBs
proposed in this paper outperform the graphBior, OSBFB and PRT in small and moderate noise scenario,
and that the spline NSGFBs have comparable performance with the rest in the strong noisy case. Also
from Tables IV and V, we see that the differences between the input and output `p -SNRs for p = 2, ∞
are in some range. This confirms the conclusions in Proposition V.2 and Corollary VI.4 that the output
noise is dominated by a multiple of the input noise.
Shown in Figure 6 is the input noise with η = 1/16 and differences between the original signal xo and
the denoised signal x̃ via the graphBior, OSGFB, PRT and spline NSGFBs, where a random geometric
graph RGG4096 , original signal xo and noise are the same as in Tables IV and V. It indicates that
all denoising techniques have satisfactory performance inside the same strip where the signal has small
variation, and that the spline NSGFBs proposed in this paper achieve better performance visually on noise
suppression than the other three methods do near the boundary of two adjacency strips where the signal
has large variation.
The proposed NSGFBs can be implemented in a distributed manner and they are beneficial to (local)
noise suppression on graphs of very large scale. Our simulations indicate that for random geometric graphs
RGGN with large size N and 1 ≤ p ≤ ∞, the output `p -SNRs of spline NSGFBs have invisible change
for the same input noise level when the graph size N increases.
A PPENDIX
A. Proof of Proposition III.3
The first inequality follows from (III.7). Now we prove the second inequality. Write A = (a(i, j))i,j∈V ,
and define its Schur norm by
X
X
|a(i, j)|, sup
|a(i, j)| .
kAkS = max sup
i∈V
j∈V
j∈V
i∈V
20
Fig. 6. Plotted on the top from left to right are the input noise , differences between the original signal xo and the denoised signal x̃
obtained by the graphBior, OSGFB and PRT. Shown at the bottom from left to right are differences between the original signal xo and the
denoised signal x̃ obtained by NSGFB-B1, NSGFB-B2, NSGFB-L1 and NSGFB-L2.
It is well known that the filter bound kAkBp , 1 ≤ p ≤ ∞, of a graph filter A is dominated by its Schur
norm,
(A.1)
kAkBp ≤ kAkS for all 1 ≤ p ≤ ∞.
Then it suffices to prove
kAkS ≤ D1 (G)(σ + 1)d kAk∞ .
(A.2)
For any i ∈ V , we obtain
X
|a(i, j)| =
j∈V
X
|a(i, j)| ≤ kAk∞
ρ(i,j)≤σ
X
1
ρ(i,j)≤σ
≤ D1 (G)(σ + 1)d kAk∞ ,
where the second inequality follows from (II.2). Similarly for any j ∈ V , we have
X
|a(i, j)| ≤ D1 (G)(σ + 1)d kAk∞ .
(A.3)
(A.4)
i∈V
Combining (A.3) and (A.4) completes the proof.
B. Proof of Theorem IV.6
The upper bound estimate (IV.16) follows directly from Proposition III.3 and the observation that
1/2
kH0 kB2 + kH1 kB2 ≤ 2kHkB2 .
(A.5)
Now we prove the lower bound estimate (IV.15). Set
B=I−
H
.
kHkB2
(A.6)
Then B has bandwidth 2σ,
kBkB2 ≤ (κ − 1)/κ,
and
H
−1
= (kHkB2 )
−1
∞
X
n=0
Bn .
(A.7)
(A.8)
21
Write H−1 = (g(i, j))i,j∈V . For κ = 1, we have
H−1 = (kHkB2 )−1 I.
(A.9)
Now we consider the case that κ > 1. Set θ = ln(κ/(κ − 1)), and for i, j ∈ V let n0 (i, j) be the minimal
integer such that 2n0 (i, j) ≥ ρ(i, j)/σ. Then
∞
X
|g(i, j)| ≤ (kHkB2 )−1
≤ (kHkB2 )−1
kBn k∞
n=n0 (i,j)
∞
X
kBknB2
n=n0 (i,j)
−1
≤ (kHkB2 ) κ(1 − κ−1 )n0 (i,j)
θ
≤ kH−1 kB2 exp −
ρ(i, j) ,
(A.10)
2σ
where the first inequality follows from (A.8) and the observation that Bn have bandwidth 2nσ, the second
one is true by (III.7), and the third one holds by (III.8) and (A.7).
From (A.9) we immediately get
kH−1 kBp = kH−1 kB2
(A.11)
if κ = 1, and by (A.1) and (A.10), we have
kH−1 kBp ≤ kH−1 kB2 ×
∞
X
sup
≤
≤
X
θ
exp −
ρ(i, j)
2σ
i∈V n=0
2nσ≤ρ(i,j)<2(n+1)σ
∞
X
−1
kH kB2 sup
e−nθ µ B
i∈V n=0
∞
X
(n
(2σ)d D1 (G)kH−1 kB2
n=0
i, 2(n + 1)σ − 1
+ 1)d (1 − κ−1 )n
1 (d)
1−t
d
d+1
−1
≤ d!(2σ) D1 (G)κ kH kB2
≤ (2σ)d D1 (G)kH−1 kB2
t=1−κ−1
(A.12)
if κ > 1. Then
kxkp ≤ kH−1 kBp kHT0 kBp kH0 xkp + kHT1 kBp kH1 xkp
≤ d!(2σ)d D1 (G)κd+1 kH−1 kB2
× kHT0 kBp kH0 xkp + kHT1 kBp kH1 xkp
≤ d!2d (σ + 1)2d (D1 (G))2 κd+1 kH−1 kB2
× kH0 kB2 kH0 xkp + kH1 kB2 kH1 xkp
−1/2
≤ d!2d+1 (σ + 1)2d (D1 (G))2 κd+2 kHkB2
× max kH0 xkp , kH1 xkp ,
−1/2
≤ d!2d+1 (σ + 1)2d (D1 (G))2 κd+2 kHkB2
1
× kH0 xkpp + kH1 xkpp p ,
(A.13)
where the second inequality follows from (A.11) and (A.12), the third holds by Proposition III.3, and the
fourth one is true by (A.5) and (IV.17). This proves (IV.15) and completes the proof.
22
C. Proof of Theorem V.1
By (III.3), (V.1), (V.2) and (V.3), we obtain
G0 H0 + G1 H1
sym
sym
sym
= Q0 (Lsym
G )P0 (LG ) + Q1 (LG )Q1 (LG )
Λ)P0 (Λ
Λ) + Q1 (Λ
Λ)P1 (Λ
Λ))U = UT U = I.
= UT (Q0 (Λ
This completes the proof.
D. Proof of Proposition V.2
Set z0 = H0 x and z1 = H1 x. Then
kx̃ − xkp ≤ kG0 (z0 − Ψ0 (z0 ))kp + kG1 (z1 − Ψ1 (z1 ))kp
≤ (kG0 kBp + kG1 kBp )
≤ D1 (G)(σ̃ + 1)d (kG0 k∞ + kG1 k∞ ),
(A.14)
where the first inequality follows from the perfect reconstruction condition (I.1) for the NSGFB constructed
in Theorem V.1, the second one holds by (V.9), and the last estimate is true by Proposition III.3.
E. Proof of Theorem VI.1
By (VI.4) and (A.10), we have
|gl,L (i, j)| ≤ kH−1 kB2 kHl k∞
X
ρ(k,j)≤σ
θ
ρ(i, k)
exp −
2σ
−1
≤ D1 (G)kH kB2 kHl k∞ (σ + 1)d
θ
θ
ρ(i, j) +
, i, j ∈ V,
× exp −
2σ
2
where l = 0, 1. This proves (VI.6).
F. Proof of Theorem VII.2
Set y(m) = x̃ − x(m) and write y(m) = (y (m) (i))i∈V , m ≥ 0. We claim that
(m)
y(m) = H−1 (HT0 z̃0
(m)
+ HT1 z̃1 ), m ≥ 0.
(A.15)
The above claim holds for m = 0, since
(0)
(0)
y(0) = x̃ = H−1 (HT0 z̃0 + HT1 z̃1 ) = H−1 HT0 z̃0 + HT1 z̃1
by (VII.1) and (VII.10). Inductively for m ≥ 1, we have
y(m) = y(m−1) − v(m)
(m−1)
(m−1)
= H−1 HT0 z̃0
+ HT1 z̃1
− v(m)
(m)
(m)
= H−1 HT0 z̃0 + HT1 z̃1
where the first and third equalities follow from (VII.9) and the second equality holds by the inductive
hypothesis. This completes the proof of Claim A.15.
2r −1
Write (χ2r
= (gk (i, j))i,j∈B(k,2r) and
k Hχk )
2r+2σ
2r −1 2r
χrk (χ2r
− χ2r
k ) = (g̃k (i, j))i,j∈V , k ∈ V.
k Hχk ) χk H(χk
(A.16)
23
Following the argument used to prove (A.10), we have
θ
−1
ρ(i, j)
|gk (i, j)| ≤ kH kB2 exp −
2σ
for all i, j ∈ B(k, 2r). By (III.7), (A.16) and (A.17), we obtain
g̃k (i, j) = 0
where either i 6∈ B(k, r) or j 6∈ B(k, 2r + 2σ)\B(k, 2r), and
X
θ
|g̃k (i, j)| ≤ kH−1 kB2 kHk∞
exp −
ρ(i, l)
2σ
l∈B(j,2σ)
θ
≤ D1 (G)(2σ + 1)d κ exp −
r+θ
2σ
where i ∈ B(k, r) and j ∈ B(k, 2r + 2σ)\B(k, 2r).
(m)
(m)
Write vk = (vk (i))i∈V , m ≥ 1, k ∈ V . By (VII.9), (A.15), we have
(m)
χrk (vk
(A.17)
(A.18)
(A.19)
2r −1 2r
− y(m−1) ) = χrk (χ2r
k Hχk ) χk
(m−1)
×H(χ2r+2σ
− χ2r
.
k )y
k
Combining the above equation with (A.18) and (A.19), we get
X
(m)
|vk (i) − y (m−1) (i)| =
g̃k (i, j)y (m−1) (j)
j∈B(k,2r+2σ)
θ
r+θ
≤ D1 (G)(2σ + 1) κ exp −
2σ
X
×
|y (m−1) (j)| , i ∈ B(k, r).
d
(A.20)
j∈B(i,3r+2σ)
This together with (VII.9) implies that
|y (m) (i)| = |v (m) (i) − y (m−1) (i)|
X
1
(m)
≤
|vk (i) − y (m−1) (i)|
µ(B(i, r))
k∈B(i,r)
θ
≤ D1 (G)(2σ + 1)d κ exp −
r+θ
2σ
X
(m−1)
×
|y
(j)|
(A.21)
j∈B(i,3r+2σ)
for all i ∈ V and m ≥ 1. Using the above componentwise estimate, we obtain
ky(m+1) kp ≤ δr,σ ky(m) kp , m ≥ 0.
Iteratively applying the above estimate proves (VII.14).
(A.22)
24
R EFERENCES
[1] I. F. Akyildiz, W. Su, Y. Sankarasubramaniam, and E. Cayirci, “Wireless sensor networks: a survey,” Comput. Netw., vol. 38, pp.
393-422, Mar. 2002.
[2] C. Chong and S. Kumar, “Sensor networks: evolution, opportunities, and challenges,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 91, pp. 1247-1256, Aug. 2003.
[3] J. Yick, B. Mukherjee, and D. Ghosal, “Wireless sensor network survey,” Comput. Netw., vol. 52, pp. 2292-2330, Aug. 2008.
[4] R. Hebner, “The power grid in 2030,” IEEE Spectr., vol. 54, pp. 51-55, Apr. 2017.
[5] C. Cheng, Y. Jiang, and Q. Sun, “Spatially distributed sampling and reconstruction,” Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal., to be published.
[6] F. Chung and L. Lu, Complex Graphs and Networks (CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics 107), American Mathematical
Society, 2006.
[7] R. Coifman and M. Maggioni, “Diffusion Wavelets,” Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal., vol. 26, pp. 53-94, July 2006.
[8] D. I. Shuman, S. K. Narang, P. Frossard, A. Ortega, and P. Vandergheynst, “The emerging field of signal processing on graphs:
Extending high-dimensional data analysis to networks and other irregular domains,” IEEE Signal Process. Mag., vol. 30, pp. 83-98,
May 2013.
[9] A. Sandryhaila and J. M. F. Moura, “Big data analysis with signal processing on graphs: Representation and processing of massive
data sets with irregular structure,” IEEE Signal Process. Mag., vol. 31, pp. 80-90, Sept. 2014.
[10] A. Sandryhaila and J. M. F. Moura, “Discrete signal processing on graphs,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 61, pp. 1644-1656, Apr.
2013.
[11] A. Sandryhaila and J. M. F. Moura, “Discrete signal processing on graphs: frequency analysis,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 62,
pp. 3042-3054, June 2014.
[12] I. Daubechies, Ten Lectures on Wavelets (CBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics 61), SIAM, 1992.
[13] S. Mallat, A wavelet tour of signal processing: the sparse way, Academic Press, 2009.
[14] M. Vetterli and J. Kovacevic, Wavelets and Subband Coding, Prentice Hall PTR, 1995.
[15] M. Crovella and E. Kolaczyk, “Graph wavelets for spatial traffic analysis,” in Twenty-Second Annual Joint Conf. of the IEEE Computer
and Communications ( INFOCOM 2003), IEEE, vol. 3, San Francisco, USA, 2003, pp. 1848-1857.
[16] M. Gavish, B. Nader, and R. R. Coifman, “Multiscale wavelets on trees, graphs and high dimensional data: Theory and applications
to semi supervised learning,” in Proc. of the 27th Int. Conf. on Machine Learning, Haifa, Israel, 2010, pp. 367-374.
[17] G. Shen and A. Ortega, “Transform-based distributed data gathering,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 58, pp. 3802-3815, July 2010.
[18] W. Wang and K. Ramchandran, “Random multiresolution representations for arbitrary sensor network graphs,” in Proc. of 2006 IEEE
Int. Conf. on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), IEEE, vol. 4, Toulouse, France, 2006, pp. 161-164.
[19] D. K. Hammod, P. Vandergheynst, and R. Gribonval, “Wavelets on graphs via spectral graph theory,” Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal.,
vol. 30, pp. 129-150, Mar. 2011.
[20] S. K. Narang and A. Ortega, “Perfect reconstruction two-channel wavelet filter banks for graph structured data,” IEEE Trans. Signal
Process., vol. 60, pp. 2786-2799, June 2012.
[21] S. K. Narang and A. Ortega, “Compact support biorthogonal wavelet filterbanks for arbitrary undirected graphs,” IEEE Trans. Signal
Process., vol. 61, pp. 4673-4685, Oct. 2013.
[22] Y. Tanaka and A. Sakiyama, “M-Channel Oversampled Graph Filter Banks,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 62, pp. 3578-3590, July
2014.
[23] V. N. Ekambaram, G. C. Fanti, B. Ayazifar, and K. Ramchandran, “Spline-like wavelet filterbanks for multiresolution analysis of
graph-structured data,” IEEE Trans. Signal Inf. Process. Netw., vol. 1, pp. 268-278, Dec. 2015.
[24] R. M. Karp, “Reducibility among combinatorial problems,” in Complexity of Computer Computations, R.E. Miller, J. W. Thatcher, J.
D. Bohlinger, Ed., 1972, pp. 85-103.
[25] H. Q. Nguyen, and M. N. Do, “Downsampling of signals on graphs via maximum spanning trees,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol.
63, pp. 182-191, Jan. 2015.
[26] D. I. Shuman, M. J. Faraji, and P. Vandergheynst, “A Multiscale Pyramid Transform for Graph Signals,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process.,
vol. 64, pp. 2119-2134, Apr. 2016.
[27] N. Tremblay and P. Borgnat, “Subgraph-based filterbanks for graph signals,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 64, pp. 3827-3840,
Aug. 2016.
[28] S. Chen, A. Sandryhaila, and J. Kovačević, “Distributed algorithm for graph signal inpainting,” in 2015 IEEE Int. Conf. on Acoustics,
Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), IEEE, Brisbane, Australia, 2015, pp. 3731-3735.
[29] T. T. Doan and L. B. Carolyn, “Distributed primal dual methods for economic dispatch in power networks,” arXiv preprint, arXiv:
1609.06287, Sept. 2016.
[30] D. Baker and A. Ephremides, “The architectural organization of a mobile radio network via a distributed algorithm,” IEEE Trans. on
Commun., vol. 29, pp. 1694-1701, Nov. 1981.
[31] K. Hwang and Z. Xu, “Scalable parallel computers for real-time signal processing,” IEEE Signal Process. Mag., vol. 13, pp. 50-66,
July 1996.
[32] J. Vazquez and C. Malcolm, “Distributed multirobot exploration maintaining a mobile network,” in Proc. of Second IEEE Int. Conf.
on Intelligent Systems, IEEE, Varna, Bulgaria, 2004, pp. 113-118.
[33] Q. Shi, H. Chen, H. Chen, and L. Jiang, “Distributed wireless sensor network localization via sequential greedy optimization algorithm,”
IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 58, pp. 3328-3340, June 2010.
[34] Y. Zhang, T. Cao, S. Li, X. Tian, L. Yuan, H. Jia, and A. V. Vasilakos, “Parallel Processing Systems for Big Data: A Survey,” Proc.
IEEE, vol. 104, pp. 2114-2136, Nov. 2016.
[35] Z. Wang and A. C. Bovik, “Mean squared error: love it or leave it?- A new look at signal fidelity measures,” IEEE Signal Processing
Mag., vol. 98, pp. 98-117, Jan. 2009.
[36] Q. Sun, “Localized nonlinear functional equations and two sampling problems in signal processing,” Adv. Comput. Math., vol. 40, pp.
415-458, Apr. 2014.
25
[37] D. I. Shuman, B. Ricaud, and P. Vandergheynst, “Vertex-frequency analysis on graphs,” Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal., vol. 40, pp.
260-291, Mar. 2016.
[38] M. Penrose, Random Geometric Graphs (Oxford Studies in Probability 5), Oxford University Press, 2003.
[39] M. S. Kotzagiannidis and P. L. Dragotti, “Sampling and Reconstruction of Sparse Signals on Circulant Graphs - An Introduction to
Graph-FRI,” arXiv preprint, arXiv: 1606.08085, June 2016.
[40] A. Aldroubi, A. Baskakov, and I. Krishtal, “Slanted matrices, Banach frames, and sampling,” J. Funct. Anal., vol. 255, pp. 1667-1691,
Oct. 2008.
[41] C. E. Shin and Q. Sun, “Stability of localized operators,” J. Funct. Anal., vol. 256, pp. 2417-2439, Apr. 2009.
[42] R. Tessera, “Left inverses of matrices with polynomial decay,” J. Funct. Anal., vol. 259, pp. 2793-2813, Dec. 2010.
[43] Q. Sun, “Wiener’s lemma for infinite matrices II,” Constr. Approx., vol. 34, pp. 209-235, Oct. 2011.
[44] C. E. Shin and Q. Sun, “Polynomial control on stability, inversion and powers of matrices on simple graphs,” arXiv preprint, arXiv:
1705.07385, May 2017.
[45] A. Sakiyama and Y. Tanaka. “Oversampled graph Laplacian matrix for graph filter banks,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 62, pp.
6425-6437, Dec. 2014.
[46] A. Sakiyama, K. Watanabe, and Y. Tanaka, “Spectral graph wavelets and filter banks With low approximation error,” IEEE Trans.
Signal Inf. Process. Netw., vol. 2, pp. 230-245, Sept. 2016.
| 7cs.IT
|
1
Throughput Maximization for Decode-and-Forward
Relay Channels with Non-Ideal Circuit Power
arXiv:1606.04661v2 [cs.IT] 19 Jun 2017
Hengjing Liang, Chuan Huang, Member, IEEE, Zhi Chen, Member, IEEE, and Shaoqian Li, Fellow, IEEE
Abstract—This paper studies the throughput maximization
problem for a three-node relay channel with non-ideal circuit
power. In particular, the relay operates in a half-duplex manner,
and the decode-and-forward (DF) relaying scheme is adopted.
Considering the extra power consumption by the circuits, the
optimal power allocation to maximize the throughput of the
considered system over an infinite time horizon is investigated.
First, two special scenarios, i.e., the direct link transmission (only
use the direct link to transmit) and the relay assisted transmission
(the source and the relay transmit with equal probability), are
studied, and the corresponding optimal power allocations are
obtained. By transforming two non-convex problems into quasiconcave ones, the closed-form solutions show that the source and
the relay transmit with certain probability, which is determined
by the average power budgets, circuit power consumptions, and
channel gains. Next, based on the above results, the optimal
power allocation for both the cases with and without direct
link is derived, which is shown to be a mixed transmission
scheme between the direct link transmission and the relay assisted
transmission.
Index Terms—Green communication, relay channel, throughput maximization, optimal power allocation, decode-and-forward
(DF).
I. I NTRODUCTION
Green communication has drawn great attention during the
past years. It is reported that more than 1 million gallons of
diesel are consumed by Vodafone, for example, to power their
cellular networks [1], and the consumption will still go up in
the future. The growing cost of fossil fuel energy calls for
both environmental and economical demands and motivations
for the design of green communications [2].
Circuit energy consumption amounts for a significant part of
the total energy consumption [3], [4]. In order to reduce circuit
energy consumption for a fixed amount of data transmission,
increasing throughput and reducing transmission time are
the key targets. Thus, green communication associated with
non-ideal circuit power needs to be designed both energy
and spectrum efficiently. A generic energy efficiency (EE)
maximization problem considering circuit power consumption
was summarized in [5]. In [6], a link adaptation scheme that
balances circuit power consumption and transmission power
This paper was presented in part at IEEE Wireless Communications and
Networking Conference 2017, San Francisco, CA, USA, March 2017.
This work was supported in part by the High-Tech Research and Development (863) Program of China under Grant 2015AA01A707 and the National
Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 61501093.
The authors are with the National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Communications, University of Electronic Science and Technology
of China, Chengdu 610054, China (e-mail: [email protected]; {huangch,
chenzhi, lsq}@uestc.edu.cn). Corresponding author: C. Huang.
was proposed in frequency-selective channels. EE maximization problems with circuit energy consumption were also
considered in orthogonal frequency division multiple access
(OFDMA) [7] and wireless sensor networks [8]. A throughput
optimal policy considering circuit power was proposed for
point-to-point channels with energy harvesting transmitter [9].
Relaying has been considered as a promising technique to
mitigate fading and extend coverage in wireless networks,
which was introduced in [10] and comprehensively studied in
[11]. Decode-and-forward (DF) relaying was studied in [12]–
[15]. The capacity of a classical three-node relay channel,
consisting of a source, a destination, and a single halfduplex DF relay, was investigated in [16], and the capacity
analysis is extended to a parallel fading relay channel in [17].
Resource allocation problems maximizing spectral efficiency
(SE) for relay networks under different scenarios have been
investigated in [18]–[23]. Green communication problems in
relay networks were discussed in [24]–[31]. In [24], minimum energy required to transmit one information bit was
studied in amplify-and-forward (AF) and DF. In [25] and
[26], energy minimization problems considering channel state
information acquiring energy and signaling overhead were
investigated in single relay selection scheme, respectively.
In [27] and [28], non-ideal circuit power consumption, i.e.,
non-zero circuit power consumption during transmission, was
considered for total energy minimization problems in multihop
relay channels. In [29], sum rate maximization problem with
non-ideal circuit power was studied under holistic power
constraints for the multiple-input multiple-output two-way AF
relay channels. In [30], circuit power consumption was considered for the secure EE maximization of AF relay channels.
In [31], sleep mode was further introduced to save energy in
a one-dimension cellular network, where the relay placement
and the relay sleep probability were jointly optimized. In
[32], throughput maximization problems with non-ideal circuit
power consumption were studied in a three-node relay channel
with direct link.
In this paper, throughput maximization for a three-node
half-duplex Gaussian relay channels considering non-ideal
circuit power is studied over an infinite time horizon. The
transceiver circuitry consumes a constant amount of power in
the active mode and negligible power in the sleep mode. Under
this setup, the optimal power allocations for the throughput
maximization of the relay channel with and without direct link
are both investigated. The main contributions of this paper are
summarized as follows.
• First, the throughput maximization problems for two
special scenarios are investigated. For the direct link
2
transmission (DLT), where only direct link is used for
transmission, the optimal power allocation shows that
the source transmits either at a certain portion of time
slots or constantly according to different average power
budgets, circuit power consumptions, and channel power
gains. Then, the average throughput for DLT is obtained.
For the relay assisted transmission with direct link (RATDL), where the source and the relay transmit with equal
probability, the optimal power allocation has a similar
transmission structure as DLT. By solving a max-min
problem, the average throughput for RAT-DL is obtained.
• Then, with the two special power allocation cases (DLT
and RAT-DL) and the characteristics of their average
throughputs, the optimal power allocation for the throughput maximization of the relay channel with the direct link,
where the source and the relay are not constrained to
transmit with equal probability, is studied. The optimal
solutions obtained by graphic method are shown to be
either a single type of transmission (DLT or RAT-DL) or
a time sharing of both transmissions. Whether to choose
RAT-DL depends on the average power budget and the
maximum EE of DLT and RAT-DL.
• Furthermore, the optimal power allocation for the relay
assisted transmission without direct link (RAT-WDL),
where the source and the relay transmit with equal
probability and the direct link is inactive, is analyzed.
Asymptotic analysis is given for DLT, RAT-DL together
with RAT-WDL at the low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)
and high SNR regimes afterwards. At last, simulation
results show that the optimal power allocation scheme
outperforms other conventional schemes.
The rest of this paper is organized as follows. Section II
introduces the system model and the main assumptions of
this paper. Section III studies two special scenarios. Section
IV investigates the optimal power allocation scheme for the
case with direct link and asymptotic performances. Section V
analyzes RAT-WDL and Section VI evaluates the throughput
performances by simulations. Finally, Section VII concludes
the paper.
Notation: C (x) = log2 (1 + x) denotes the capacity of the
additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channel, where x is
the SNR of the channel.
II. S YSTEM M ODEL
This paper considers a three-node relay channel as shown
in Fig. 1, which consists of a source, a destination, and a halfduplex relay. The source sends information to the destination
with the help of the relay. Slotted transmission scheme is
adopted, and each time slot is with duration T .
A. Signal Model
In this subsection, channel input and output relationship of
the considered relay channel is introduced. Denote the channel
coefficients of the source-destination, source-relay, and relaydestination links as gSD , gSR , and gRD , respectively, and then
the channel power gains of the three links are given by
2
hSD = |gSD | ,
2
hSR = |gSR | ,
2
hRD = |gRD | ,
(1)
Relay
gSR
gRD
gSD
Source
Destination
Fig. 1. A three-node relay channel.
which are all constants across the time slots.
If the relay is not selected to help the source transmission,
the received signal at the destination in time slot i is given as
yD (i) = gSD x (i) + nD (i) ,
(2)
where x (i) is the source transmitted signal with power PS (i),
and nD (i) is the independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.)
circularly symmetric complex Gaussian (CSCG) noise with
zero mean and unit variance.
When the DF relaying scheme is adopted to help the source
transmission, it operates in a half-duplex manner (one time slot
is then divided into two phases), and the information encoding
and decoding processes are described as follows:
1) In the first phase of time slot i, the source broadcasts x (i)
to both the relay and the destination with power PS (i);
2) Then, the received signal at the relay during the first phase
of time slot i is given as
yR (i) = gSR x (i) + nR (i) ,
(3)
where nR (i) is i.i.d. CSCG noise with zero mean and unit
variance. Next, the relay decodes the source message, reencodes it into a new signal x̃ (i), and forwards x̃ (i) to
the destination with power PR (i).
3) Finally, the destination receives the signals over the whole
time slot, and the received signals yD1 (i) and yD2 (i) in the
two phases are given as
yD1 (i) = gSD x (i) + n1D (i) ,
(4)
yD2
(5)
(i) = gRD x̃ (i) +
n2D
(i) ,
respectively, where n1D (i) and n2D (i) are i.i.d. CSCG
noise with zero mean and unit variance.
For the purpose of exposition, consider the case that the
two phases in one time slot are with equal length. Thus, the
transmission rate for the DF relaying scheme at time slot i is
given as [16]
1
RB (i) = min {C (PS (i) hSR ) ,
2
C (PS (i) hSD ) + C (PR (i) hRD )} .
(6)
It is well known that the DF relaying scheme can work only
when hSR ≥ 2hSD [16]; otherwise, DLT without the help of
relay achieves a larger rate.
B. Power Consumption Model
In this subsection, power consumption model considering
the non-ideal circuit power is discussed. The transceiver cir-
3
cuitry works in two modes: when a signal is transmitting, all
circuits work in the active mode; and when there is no signal
to transmit, they work in the sleep mode.
1) Active mode: the consumed power is mainly comprised
of the transmission power and the circuit power. The
transmission power is determined by the power allocation
PS (i) and PR (i). The circuit power consists of the
following two parts: the transmitting circuit power Pct
comes from the power consumed by the mixer, frequency
synthesizer, active filter, and digital-to-analog converter
[4]; and the receiving circuit power Pcr is composed of the
power consumption of the mixer, frequency synthesizer,
low noise amplifier, intermediate frequency amplifier,
active filter, and analog-to-digital converter [4]. Constant
circuit power model is considered in this paper, i.e., Pct
and Pcr are constants [4]. In the sequel, superscripts “S”,
“R”, and “D” are added to Pct and Pcr to distinguish
the power consumed at the source, relay, and destination,
respectively.
2) Sleep mode: it has been shown that the power consumption Psp in the sleep mode is dominated by the leaking
current of the switching transistors and is usually much
smaller than that in the active mode [4]. Therefore, the
power consumption in the sleep mode is set as Psp = 0.
It is worth pointing out that the results of this paper
can be readily extended to the case of Psp 6= 0 by
deducting Psp from the average power budget and the
power consumption in the active mode.
In general, the circuit power consumed in the active mode
is larger than that in the sleep mode, i.e.,
Pcr > Pct > Psp .
(7)
Thus, smartly operating between the two modes can potentially
save a significant amount of energy.
Based on the power model discussed above, the power
consumptions for both DLT and RAT-DL are computed as
follows.
1) DLT: Denote αA as the total circuit power consumption
in the active mode for DLT, and it is the sum of the
transmitting circuit power at the source and the receiving
circuit power at the destination, i.e.,
αA = PctS + PcrD .
With the defined αA and Psp =
consumption at time slot i for DLT
(
0
A
Ptotal (i) =
PS (i) + αA
(8)
0, the total power
is thus given as
PS (i) = 0
PS (i) > 0.
(9)
Then, the average power constraint for DLT is defined
over N time slots, as N goes to infinity, i.e.,
N
1 X A
Ptotal (i) ≤ PA ,
N →∞ N
i=1
lim
(10)
where PA ≥ 0 is the power budget.
2) RAT-DL: Denote αB as the total circuit power consumption in the active mode for the transmission with the help
of a relay, and it is the sum of the transmitting circuit
power at the source and the relay, the receiving circuit
power at the relay and the destination, i.e.,
1
1
αB =
PctS + PcrR + PcrD +
PctR + PcrD ,
(11)
2
2
where the 12 penalty is due to the half-duplex constraint
for the considered relaying scheme. With the defined αB
and Psp = 0, the total power consumption at time slot i
for RAT-DL is given as
(
0
PS (i) = 0, PR (i) = 0
B
Ptotal (i) = PS (i)+PR (i)
+ αB PS (i) > 0, PR (i) > 0,
2
(12)
where the 21 penalty is also due to the half-duplex
constraint for the considered relaying scheme. Then, the
average power constraint for RAT-DL is defined over N
time slots, as N goes to infinity, i.e.,
N
1 X B
Ptotal (i) ≤ PB ,
N →∞ N
i=1
lim
(13)
where PB ≥ 0 is the power budget.
III. A C LOSER L OOK
AT
T WO S PECIAL C ASES
In this section, the throughput maximization problems for
two special scenarios are firstly studied, DLT and RAT-DL,
and the corresponding optimal power allocations are obtained
for these throughput maximization problems under the two
scenarios.
A. Direct Link Transmission
In this scenario, the source directly transmits to the destination in one whole time slot and the relay is always inactive.
Thus the transmission rate for DLT at time slot i is given as
R (i) = C (PS (i) hSD ) .
(14)
The goal is to determine {PS (i)} such that the long term
average throughput subject to the average power constraint
defined in (10) is maximized over N time slots as N → ∞,
i.e., solve the following optimization problem
N
1 X
CA (PA ) = max lim
C (PS (i) hSD )
{PS (i)} N →∞ N
i=1
s.t. (10), PS (i) ≥ 0.
(15)
Similar problem has been studied in [9]. As the objective
function of problem (15) is nonnegative and concave, its
solution is of the same structure as that in [9], which is
summarized as the following lemma.
Lemma 1: The optimal power allocation for problem
(15) is given as: Transmit with power value PS∗ =
max (Pee1 , PA − αA ) over p∗ portion of time slots and keep
S hSD )
silent for the rest of the slots, where Pee1 , arg max C(P
PS +αA
PS >0
A
.
and p∗ = P ∗P+α
A
S
Remark 1: From Lemma 1, it is observed that when the average power budget PA is relatively small, i.e., PA ≤ Pee1 +αA ,
4
the optimal transmission strategy is with an “on-off” structure.
It is due to that the scarce average power budget cannot support
the constant transmission with non-zero power consumption
for the circuits. Under this circumstance, transmission with
A
portion of time slots achieves the
power Pee1 over Pee1P+α
A
maximum transmission throughput. When the average power
budget is large enough, i.e., PA > Pee1 + αA , the optimal
transmission strategy follows a constant transmission with the
power value PA − αA .
With the obtained optimal transmission power PS∗ and
probability p∗ in Lemma 1, the relationship between the
average throughput CA (PA ) defined in (15) and the average
power budget PA is summarized in the following proposition.
Proposition 1: The average throughput CA (PA ) defined in
(15) is given as
(
C(Pee1 hSD )
0 ≤ PA ≤ Pee1 + αA
Pee1 +αA · PA
CA (PA ) =
C ((PA − αA ) hSD ) PA > Pee1 + αA ,
(16)
which is continuous, differentiable, and concave over PA ≥ 0.
Proof: Please see Appendix A.
Remark 2: From Proposition 1, it is observed that the
average throughput CA (PA ) is a linear function of the average
power budget PA when PA is small, i.e., PA ≤ Pee1 +αA . Since
S hSD )
Pee1 , arg max C(P
PS +αA , it suggests that the transmission
PS >0
scheme given in Lemma 1 achieves the maximum EE for the
case of DLT [9]. When the average power budget is large
enough, i.e., PA > Pee1 + αA , the source transmits constantly
to achieve the maximum SE.
B. Relay Assisted Transmission with Direct Link
The optimal power allocation for RAT-DL is studied in this
subsection. In this scenario, the relay works following the DF
relaying scheme described above: The source and the relay
transmit in each half of the time slot, i.e., the transmission
probabilities of the source and the relay are the same.
1) Problem Formulation: The goal is to determine {PS (i)}
and {PR (i)} such that the long term average throughput
subject to the average power constraint defined in (13) is
maximized over N time slots as N → ∞, i.e., solve the
following optimization problem
CB (PB ) =
N
1 X
RB (i)
{PS (i)},{PR (i)} N →∞ N
i=1
max
s.t.
lim
(13), PS (i) ≥ 0, PR (i) ≥ 0, (17)
where RB (i) is given in (6).
Since the objective function of problem (17) is nonnegative
and concave [33], it can be checked [9] that the optimal power
allocation of problem (17) is given as: Transmit with power
PS (i) = PS > 0 and PR (i) = PR > 0 over p portion of time
slots and keep silent for the rest of the slots, where PS and PR
are constants. As a result, problem (17) can be reformulated
as
p
CB (PB ) = max
min {C (PS hSR ) ,
{PS ,PR ,p} 2
C (PS hSD ) + C (PR hRD )}
(18)
PR
PR =
PS ( hSR - hSD )
hRD (1 + PS hSD )
2
1
4
3
PS + PR = 2 PB - 2a R
PS
Fig. 2. An illustration of the four disjoint feasible subsets defined in (26)–
(28).
s.t.
1
1
PS + PR + αB · p ≤ PB ,
2
2
0 ≤ p ≤ 1, PS ≥ 0, PR ≥ 0,
(19)
(20)
where (19) is obtained from (13).
It is easy to check that to achieve the optimal value of
problem (18)–(20), constraint (19) must be satisfied with
equality. Thus it follows that the optimal transmission probB
ability p∗ = PS +P2PR +2α
. Hence, problem (18)–(20) can be
B
simplified as
CB (PB ) =
PB min {C (PS hSR ) , C (PS hSD ) + C (PR hRD )}
max
{PS ,PR }
PS + PR + 2αB
s.t. PS + PR ≥ 2PB − 2αB ,
PS ≥ 0, PR ≥ 0,
(21)
(22)
(23)
where (22) is obtained by substituting p∗ into the constraint
0 ≤ p ≤ 1.
Recall that hSR ≥ 2hSD must be satisfied for RAT-DL. It
can be checked that
C (PS hSR ) ≥ C (PS hSD ) + C (PR hRD ) ;
(24)
otherwise, reducing the relay transmit power and increasing
the source transmit power can boost the average throughput.
Therefore, by substituting (24) into (21), problem (21)–(23)
can be rewritten as
C (PS hSD ) + C (PR hRD )
· PB
(25)
CB (PB ) = max
PS + PR + 2αB
{PS ,PR }
s.t. PS + PR ≥ 2PB − 2αB ,
(26)
PS (hSR − hSD )
,
(27)
PR ≤
hRD (1 + PS hSD )
PS ≥ 0, PR ≥ 0,
(28)
where (27) is obtained from (24).
The characterization of the objective function (25) is analyzed in the following lemma.
)+C(PR hRD )
Lemma 2: C(PSPhSSD
is quasiconcave over PS ≥ 0,
+PR +2αB
PR ≥ 0, and there exists a unique global maximum point.
Furthermore, it is first strictly increasing and then strictly
decreasing over PS and PR , respectively [6].
2) Optimal Point: Next, the optimal point of problem (25)–
(28) is derived. By considering the combinations of the cases
5
that the equalities in (26) and (27) are achieved or not, divide
the feasible set defined by constraints (26)–(28) into four
disjoint parts {Ri } , i = 1, 2, 3, 4, as shown in Fig. 2, where
{Ri } are rigorously defined as follows:
R1 , (PS , PR ) |PS + PR > 2PB − 2αB ,
PS (hSR − hSD )
, PS ≥ 0, PR ≥ 0 , (29)
PR <
hRD (1 + PS hSD )
R2 , (PS , PR ) |PS + PR > 2PB − 2αB ,
PS (hSR − hSD )
PR =
, PS ≥ 0, PR ≥ 0 , (30)
hRD (1 + PS hSD )
R3 , (PS , PR ) |PS + PR = 2PB − 2αB ,
PS (hSR − hSD )
, PS ≥ 0, PR ≥ 0 , (31)
PR <
hRD (1 + PS hSD )
R4 , (PS , PR ) |PS + PR = 2PB − 2αB ,
PS (hSR − hSD )
, PS ≥ 0, PR ≥ 0 . (32)
PR =
hRD (1 + PS hSD )
Suppose that (PS∗ , PR∗ ) is the optimal point to problem (25)–
(28), this point belongs to only one 1 of the four sets defined
in (29)–(32). Thus, the following four cases are studied:
1) Case 1: (PS∗ , PR∗ ) ∈ R1 .
In this case, both the constraints (26) and (27) are
inactive, and thus a candidate solution of problem (25)–
(28) is given by maximizing its objective constraint and
ignoring the constraints, i.e.,
PS1 , PR1 = (Pee2 , Pee3 ) ,
C (PS hSD ) + C (PR hRD )
arg
max
.
(33)
{PS ≥0,PR ≥0}
PS + PR + 2αB
After obtain (Pee2 , Pee3 ), the feasibility condition
(Pee2 , Pee3 ) ∈ R1 needs to be doubly checked: If it is
not satisfied, (Pee2 , Pee3 ) cannot be claimed as a solution
candidate for Case 1.
2) Case 2: (PS∗ , PR∗ ) ∈ R2 .
In this case, constraint (26) is inactive and constraint (27)
is active. Since
the equality in (27) is achieved, it follows
∗
(hSR −hSD )
, with which problem (25)–(28) can
PR ∗ = hPRDS (1+P
∗
S hSD )
be simplified as
CB (PB ) =
PB (1 + PS hSD ) hRD C (PS hSR )
max
PS ≥0 hSD hRD P 2 + (U + 2hSD hRD PB ) PS + 2αB hRD
S
(34)
s.t. hSD hRD PS2 + U PS + 2αB hRD − 2hRD PB > 0,
(35)
where U is defined as
U , hSR + hRD − hSD + 2αB hSD hRD − 2hSD hRD PB . (36)
1 The
uniqueness of the solution of problem (25)–(28) can be proved by
contradiction with the property of the strictly quasiconcave function.
To solve problem (34)–(35), first consider the case without constraint (35). Since (25) is quasiconcave over PS
SR −hSD )
and PR , and PR = hPRDS (h
(1+PS hSD ) is nondecreasing over PR ,
(34) is also quasiconcave over PS ≥ 0 [33]. Moreover,
it is easy to verify that: As PS → 0+ , the objective
function (34) approaches 0; as PS increases, (34) is
always positive; and when PS → ∞, (34) approaches 0
again. Therefore, it is concluded that (34) owns a global
maximum point over PS ≥ 0. Define
Pee4 ,
arg max
PS ≥0
(1 + PS hSD ) hRD C (PS hSR )
,
hSD hRD PS2 + (U + 2hSD hRD PB ) PS + 2αB hRD
(37)
which achieves the maximum value of (34) without
considering constraint (35).
Then, doubly check the feasibility condition (35): If PS =
Pee4 satisfies constraint (35), the solution candidate of
problem (25)–(28) in Case 2 is given as
Pee4 (hSR − hSD )
,
(38)
PS2 , PR2 = Pee4 ,
hRD (1 + Pee4 hSD )
(hSR −hSD )
where PR2 = hPRDee4(1+P
is obtained with conee4 hSD )
straint (27) achieving its equality and PS2 = Pee4 ;
2
and
if PS = Pee4 does not satisfy constraint (35),
Pee4 (hSR −hSD )
Pee4 , hRD (1+Pee4 hSD ) is not the optimal point of problem
(25)–(28). Under the circumstance, the optimal solution
must be on the boundary of the feasible set, i.e., constraint
(35) must be satisfied with equality, and this implies that
the optimal point belongs to Case 4.
3) Case 3: (PS∗ , PR∗ ) ∈ R3 .
In this case, constraint (26) is active and constraint (27)
is inactive. Since equality in (26) is achieved, it follows
PR = 2PB − 2αB − PS , with which problem (25)–(28)
can be simplified as
CB (PB ) = max C −hSD hRD PS 2 + (hSR − U ) PS
PS ≥0
+ (2PB − 2αB ) hRD )
s.t.
hSD hRD PS2
(39)
+ U PS + 2αB hRD
− 2hRD PB > 0.
(40)
As (39) is a composition of a logarithmic function and
a quadratic function, the maximum point of (39) without
considering constraint (40) is achieved by
PS =
hSD − hRD
+ PB − αB .
2hSD hRD
(41)
Then, doubly check the feasibility condition (40): If (41)
satisfies constraint (40), the solution candidate of problem
(25)–(28) in Case 3 is then given as
(42)
PS3 , PR3 = (F, G) ,
where PR3 = G is obtained with constraint (26) achieving
its equality and PS3 = F , and F , G are defined as
F ,
hSD − hRD
+ PB − αB ,
2hSD hRD
(43)
6
G,
hRD − hSD
+ PB − αB ;
2hSD hRD
(44)
and if (41) does not satisfy constraint (40), (F, G) is not
the optimal point of problem (25)–(28). Under the circumstance, the optimal solution must be on the boundary
of the feasible set, i.e., constraint (40) must be satisfied
with equality, and this implies that the optimal point
belongs to Case 4.
4) Case 4: (PS∗ , PR∗ ) ∈ R4 .
In this case, both the constraints (26) and (27) are active.
SR −hSD )
Thus, they lead to PR = hPRDS (h
(1+PS hSD ) and PS + PR =
2PB − 2αB , which imply
hSD hRD PS2 + U PS − 2 (PB − αB ) hRD = 0,
(45)
where U is defined in (36). The solution can be readily
obtained within PS ≥ 0. Denote V as the positive solution
of (45), i.e.,
q
−U + U 2 + 8 (PB − αB ) hSD hRD 2
V ,
.
(46)
2hSD hRD
The solution candidate of problem (25)–(28) in Case 4 is
given as
(47)
PS4 , PR4 = (V, 2PB − 2αB − V ) ,
where PR4 = 2PB − 2αB − V is obtained with constraint
(26) reaching equality and PS4 = V .
Remark 3: After problem (25)–(28) is solved under the
above four cases, the one achieves the largest optimal value
among the four solution candidates is the optimal solution of
problem (25)–(28).
3) Optimal Value: With four optimal solution candidates
obtained, the corresponding necessary and sufficient conditions that allow each case to happen are studied, and the
average throughput for RAT-DL is derived.
1) If the candidate solution (Pee2 , Pee3 ) obtained in (33) is
the solution to problem (25)–(28), according to Lemma
2 and Remark 3, the necessary and sufficient condition
that Case 1 happens is given as S1 ∩ S2 , where
S1 , {PB |Pee2 + Pee3 > 2PB − 2αB } ,
(48)
(
(hSR −hSD )
R+ if Pee3 < hPRDee2(1+P
ee2 hSD )
S2 ,
(49)
∅
otherwise.
(hSR −hSD )
obtained
2) If the candidate solution Pee4 , hPRDee4(1+P
ee4 hSD )
in (38) is the solution to problem (25)–(28), according
to Lemma 2 and Remark 3, the necessary and sufficient
condition that Case 2 happens is given as S2c ∩ S3 , where
S2c is the complementary set of S2 and
Pee4 (hSR − hSD )
S3 , PB Pee4 +
> 2PB − 2αB .
hRD (1 + Pee4 hSD )
(50)
3) If the candidate solution (F, G) obtained in (42) is the
solution to problem (25)–(28), according to Lemma 2
and Remark 3, the necessary and sufficient condition that
Case 3 happens is given as S1c ∩ S2 ∩ S4 , where S1c is the
complementary set of S1 and
F (hSR − hSD )
.
S4 , PB G <
hRD (1 + F hSD )
(51)
4) If the candidate solution (V, 2PB − 2αB − V ) obtained
in (47) is the solution to problem (25)–(28), according to Lemma 2 and Remark 3, the necessary and
sufficient condition that Case 4 happens is given as
(S1c ∩ S2 ∩ S4c ) ∪ (S2c ∩ S3c ), where S3c and S4c are the
complementary sets of S3 and S4 , respectively.
Based on the above discussions, the optimal solutions of
problem (17) are summarized. The average throughput defined
in (17) for RAT-DL is also given in the following proposition.
Proposition 2: The optimal power allocation for problem
(17) is given as: Transmit with power value (PS∗ , PR∗ ) over p∗
portion of time slots and keep silent for the rest of slots, where
(Pee2 , Pee3 )
PB ∈ S1 ∩ S2
P , Pee4 (hSR −hSD )
PB ∈ S2c ∩ S3
ee4 hRD (1+Pee4 hSD )
(PS∗ , PR∗ ) =
PB ∈ S1c ∩ S2 ∩ S4
(F, G)
(V, 2PB − 2αB − V ) otherwise,
(52)
2PB
and p∗ = P ∗ +P
∗ +2α . With the optimal power allocation, the
B
S
R
average throughput CB (PB ) defined in (17) is given as
JPB
PB ∈ S1 ∩ S2
M P
PB ∈ S2c ∩ S3
B
CB (PB ) = 1
1
C (F hSD ) + 2 C (GhRD ) PB ∈ S1c ∩ S2 ∩ S4
12
otherwise,
2 C (V hSR )
(53)
which is continuous, differentiable, and concave over the
hSD )+C(Pee3 hRD )
and M ,
domain, where J , C(Pee2
Pee2 +Pee3 +2αB
(1+Pee4 hSD )hRD C(Pee4 hSR )
hSD hRD P 2 +(U+2hSD hRD PB )Pee4 +2αB hRD .
ee4
Proof: Please see Appendix B.
Remark 4: Based on Proposition 2, it is worth noting that the
transmission scheme given in Proposition 2 is similar to DLT,
which transmits with an on-off structure when the average
power budget PB is small to maximize the EE for the case
of RAT-DL, and transmits constantly when the average power
budget PB is large to maximize the SE. It is also worth noticing
that Pee2 , Pee3 , and Pee4 can be efficiently obtained by a simple
bisection search.
IV. O PTIMAL P OWER A LLOCATION FOR
D IRECT L INK
THE
C ASE
WITH
Based on the two special scenarios studied in the previous
section, the optimal power allocation for the case with direct
link between the source and the destination is investigated.
A. Optimal Power Allocation for the Mixed Transmission
It is worth pointing out that the considered system can only
work in one of three modes for each time slot: DLT, RATDL, or keeping silence. Thus, the optimal power allocation
over an infinite time horizon can only be the combination
of the above three modes. Moreover, by the analysis in the
previous section, it is shown that the mode of keeping silence
7
can be incorporated into any one of the first two modes,
since there is no transmission in portion of the time slots
in these two modes. Therefore, the optimal power allocation
for the throughput maximization of the relay channel with
direct link is a mixed transmission (MT) scheme, i.e., transmit
with the schemes of DLT and RAT-DL discussed in the
previous section. In other words, to solve the optimal power
allocation for MT is equivalent to find the average power
budgets PA and PB for DLT and RAT-DL to maximize the
throughput of the considered relay system, subject to the
average power constraint P0 . Then, the following proposition
is easily obtained.
Proposition 3: The throughput maximization problem for
the relay channel with direct link and non-ideal circuit power
is formulated as
max θCA (PA ) + (1 − θ) CB (PB )
{PA ,PB ,θ}
s.t. θPA + (1 − θ) PB = P0 ,
0 ≤ θ ≤ 1, PA ≥ 0, PB ≥ 0,
C
P
(a)
C
(54)
P
(55)
(56)
(b)
where θ stands for θ portion of time slots for DLT and 1 − θ
stands for 1 − θ portion of time slots for RAT-DL.
Before the optimal solutions of problem (54)–(56) are given,
the relationship between the average throughput for DLT
CA (P ) and RAT-DL CB (P ) is discussed. From (16) and (53),
it can be inferred that CA (P ) and CB (P ) are both increasing
and concave functions, which start from the origin point,
increase linearly, and then turn to logarithmic functions after
some points. Their relationship falls into the following three
cases (the categorization is discussed later in Remark 6 and
Remark 7):
C
b1
(c)
C
1) Case 1: the linear parts of CA (P ) and CB (P ) coincide,
and CA (P ) > CB (P ) after a specific point.
2) Case 2: CA (P ) > CB (P ) for any P > 0, i.e., CA (P ) >
CB (P ) have no intersection point for P > 0.
3) Case 3: CA (P ) and CB (P ) have one or more intersection
points for P > 0, and CA (P ) > CB (P ) when P is large
enough.
In Case 3, suppose there are K > 0 intersection points, and
there exist K straight lines tangent to both CA (P ) and CB (P ).
Denote the x-coordinates of the tangent points on CA (P ) and
CB (P ) as ai and bi , i = 1, 2, ···, K, respectively. The relationship between ai and bi is b1 < a1 < a2 < b2 < ··· < bK < aK
if K is odd, or a1 < b1 < b2 < a2 < · · · < bK < aK if
K is even. Examples are shown in Fig. 3. It is worth noting
that with the average throughput CA (PA ) and CB (PB ) given
in (16) and (53), the x-coordinates ai and bi of the tangent
points can be obtained by the following lemma.
Lemma 3: The x-coordinates a and b of the the tangent
points (a, CA (a)) and (b, CB (b)) on the same tangent line can
be obtained by solving the following two equations
′
′
CA (a) = CB (b) ,
(57)
′
CA (a) − CB (b)
.
(58)
CA (a) =
a−b
If there are infinite solutions, Case 1 satisfies. If there is no
solution, Case 2 satisfies. If there are finite solutions, Case 3
P
a1
a1
b1
b2
a2
P
(d)
Fig. 3. Examples of relationships between CA (P ) and CB (P ): (a) the linear
parts of CA (P ) and CB (P ) coincide; (b) CA (P ) > CB (P ) for any P > 0;
(c) CA (P ) and CB (P ) have only one intersection point for P > 0; (d)
CA (P ) and CB (P ) have two intersection points for P > 0.
satisfies.
With the x-coordinates of the tangent points obtained by
Lemma 3, the optimal power allocation for problem (54)–(56)
is given as the following proposition.
Proposition 4: The optimal power allocation for problem
(54)–(56) is given as
1) For Case 1 and Case 2,
(PA∗ , PB∗ , θ∗ ) = (P0 , 0, 1) ,
(59)
8
2) For Case 3, if K is odd,
P0 ∈ Ω1
(P0 , 0, 1)
∗
∗ ∗
(PA , PB , θ ) = (0,
P0 , 0)
P0 ∈ Ω2
ai , bi , P0 −bi
P0 ∈ Ω3 ,
ai −bi
(60)
if K is even,
P0 ∈ Ω4
(P0 , 0, 1)
∗
∗ ∗
(0,
P
,
0)
(PA , PB , θ ) = 0
P0 ∈ Ω5
P
−b
ai , b i , 0 i
P0 ∈ Ω6 ,
ai −bi
Remark 6: The optimal transmission for MT chooses the
one with higher EE to transmit when P0 is small, where the
corresponding EE are the scaling factors of (62) and (63).
2) High SNR Regime: Based on the results in (16) and (53),
as PA → ∞ and PB → ∞, the average throughput for DLT
and RAT-DL at the high SNR regime are asymptotically given
as
CA (PA ) ≈ log2 ((PA − αA ) hSD ) ,
(64)
(61)
CB (PB ) ≈
1
log (V hSR ) .
2 2
(65)
Note that V defined in (46) is a polynomial of PB with
maximum exponent of 1. Besides, it is obviously obtained in
(65) that the multiplexing gain of RAT-DL is 12 , which is due to
the half-duplex penalty. However, the power gain of RAT-DL
does not reach the square of PB and can not compensate the
(K+1)/2
(K+1)/2
[
[
loss
in multiplexing gain, which results in a lower throughput
(b2i−2 , b2i−1 ) ,
(a2i−1 , a2i ) , Ω2 ,
Ω1 ,
performance
at the high SNR regime compared to that of
i=1
i=1
DLT.
It
is
also
in accordance with the observed four cases
(K+1)/2
(K−1)/2
[
[
of
relationships
between
CA (P ) and CB (P ) in Section IV.
(b2i−1 , a2i−1 ) ,
(a2i , b2i ) ∪
Ω3 ,
Remark 7: The optimal transmission for MT always chooses
i=1
i=1
K/2
K/2
DLT when P0 is large due to its higher throughput perfor[
[
mance at the high SNR regime.
(b2i−1 , b2i ) ,
(a2i , a2i+1 ) , Ω5 ,
Ω4 ,
where a0 , b0 , and aK+1 are defined as a0 = b0 , 0 and
aK+1 , +∞ for the purpose of exposition, and Ωi , i =
1, 2, · · ·, 6 are defined as
Ω6 ,
i=1
i=0
K/2
K/2
[
[
(a2i−1 , b2i−1 ) ∪
(b2i , a2i ) .
V. R ELAY A SSISTED T RANSMISSION
L INK
i=1
i=1
Proof: Please see Appendix C.
Remark 5: It is observed that in Case 1, Case 2, and some
situations in Case 3, the optimal power allocation scheme only
chooses DLT or RAT-DL, while in other situations in Case 3,
a time sharing of both transmissions is applied. The transmission types, on-off transmission or constant transmission,
are decided according to DLT average power budget PA∗ and
RAT-DL average power budget PB∗ , respectively.
B. Asymptotic Analysis
In this subsection, throughput performances for DLT and
RAT-DL at the low SNR and high SNR regimes are investigated to further illustrate the optimal transmission scheme.
1) Low SNR Regime: As PA → 0 and PB → 0, the average
throughput for DLT and RAT-DL at the low SNR regime are
given in (16) and (53):
CA (PA ) =
C (Pee1 hSD )
· PA ,
Pee1 + αA
(62)
( C(Pee2 hSD )+C(Pee3 hRD )
· PB
Pee2 +Pee3 +2αB
(1+Pee4 hSD )hRD C(Pee4 hSR )
hSD hRD P 2 +(U+2hSD hRD PB )Pee4 +2αB hRD
S2
· PB S2c .
ee4
(63)
It is interesting to note that both CA (PA )
and CB (PB ) are linear functions of the average
power budgets PA and PB respectively at the low
ee1 hSD )
and
SNR
regime. The scaling factors C(P
Pee1 +αA
CB (PB ) =
C(Pee2 hSD )+C(Pee3 hRD )
Pee2 +Pee3 +2αB
ee4 hSD )hRD C(Pee4 hSR )
or hSD hRD P(1+P
2 +(U+2h h P )P +2α h
SD RD B
ee4
B RD
ee4
are the maximum EE for the case of DLT and RAT-DL,
respectively.
WITHOUT
D IRECT
In this section, the optimal power allocation and throughput
performance of RAT-WDL are studied as a comparison.
A. Optimal Power Allocation for RAT-WDL
In this subsection, the optimal power allocation and average
throughput for RAT-WDL are obtained. For RAT-WDL, the
direct link between the source and the destination is inactive,
i.e., the destination can only receive signals from the relay.
With the signal model described in Section II-A without
considering the direct link, the transmission rate for RAT-WDL
at time slot i is given as
1
min {C (PS (i) hSR ) , C (PR (i) hRD )} .
(66)
2
Denote αC as the total circuit power consumption in the active
mode for RAT-WDL, and it is the same as αB in (11) without
considering 12 PcrD in the first parentheses. The total power
C
B
consumption Ptotal
(i) at time slot i is the same as Ptotal
(i) in
(12) with αB replaced by αC . Then, the average total power
consumption for RAT-WDL is defined over N time slots, as
N goes to infinity, i.e.,
RC (i) =
N
1 X C
Ptotal (i) ≤ PC ,
N →∞ N
i=1
lim
(67)
where PC ≥ 0 is the power budget.
The goal is to determine {PS (i)} and {PR (i)} such that
the long term average throughput subject to the average power
9
PR∗ =
constraint defined in (67) is maximized over N time slots as
N → ∞, i.e., solve the following optimization problem
N
1 X
RC (i)
CC (PC ) =
max
lim
{PS (i)},{PR (i)} N →∞ N
i=1
s.t.
(68)
(67), PS (i) ≥ 0, PR (i) ≥ 0. (69)
Since objective function (68) is nonnegative and concave,
it is easy to check [9] that the optimal power allocation of
problem (68)–(69) is given as: Transmit with power PS (i) =
PS > 0 and PR (i) = PR > 0 over p portion of time slots
and keep silent for the rest of the slots, where PS and PR are
constants. As a result, problem (68)–(69) can be reformulated
as
p
CC (PC ) = max
min {C (PS hSR ) , C (PR hRD )} (70)
{PS ,PR ,p} 2
1
1
s.t.
PS + PR + αC · p ≤ PC , (71)
2
2
0 ≤ p ≤ 1, PS ≥ 0, PR ≥ 0,
(72)
where (71) is obtained from (67).
It is easy to check that to achieve the optimal value of
problem (70)–(72), constraint (71) must be satisfied with
equality. Thus it follows that the optimal transmission probC
. Hence, problem (70)–(72) can be
ability p∗ = PS +P2PR +2α
C
simplified as
min {C (PS hSR ) , C (PR hRD )}
· PC
PS + PR + 2αC
s.t. PS + PR ≥ 2PC − 2αC ,
CC (PC ) = max
{PS ,PR }
PS ≥ 0, PR ≥ 0,
(73)
(74)
(75)
where (74) is obtained by substituting p∗ into the constraint
0 ≤ p ≤ 1.
Since objective function (73) is a concave function divided
by a linear function, it is quasiconcave over PS and PR . The
maximum value is achieved when C (PS hSR ) = C (PR hRD )
due to the characteristics of quasiconcave functions. Thus,
substituting PR = PhS hRDSR into (73) and (74), problem (73)–(75)
can be rewritten as
hRD C (PS hSR )
· PC
(76)
CC (PC ) = max
PS ≥0 (hSR + hRD ) PS + 2hRD αC
s.t. (hSR + hRD ) PS ≥ 2hRD (PC − αC ) . (77)
Define
Pee5 , arg max
PS ≥0
PC hRD C (PS hSR )
,
(hSR + hRD ) PS + 2hRD αC
(78)
which achieves the maximum value of (76) without considering constraint (77). Then, the optimal power allocation of
problem (68)–(69) and the average throughput for RAT-WDL
are given in the following proposition.
Proposition 5: The optimal power allocation for problem
(68)–(69) is given as: Transmit with power value (PS∗ , PR∗ )
over p∗ portion of time slots and keep silent for the rest of
slots, where
2hRD
PS∗ = max Pee5 ,
(PC − αC ) ,
(79)
hSR + hRD
hSR ∗
P ,
hRD S
(80)
2PC
and p∗ = P ∗ +P
. With the optimal power allocation, the
∗
S
R +2αC
average throughput CC (PC ) defined in (68) for RAT-WDL is
given as
C hRD C(Pee5 hSR )
SR +hRD )
(h P+h
0 ≤ PC ≤ PS (h2h
+ αC
αC
RD )Pee5 +2hRD
RD
SR
2h
h
CC (PC ) = C SR RD (PC −αC )
hSR +hRD
SR +hRD )
PC > PS (h2h
+ αC .
2
RD
(81)
Proof: Please see Appendix D.
B. Asymptotic Analysis
In this subsection, the asymptotic performance for RATWDL is analyzed.
1) Low SNR Regime: As PC → 0, the average throughput
for RAT-WDL at the low SNR regime is given in (81):
CC (PC ) =
hRD C (Pee5 hSR )
· PC .
(hSR + hRD ) Pee5 + 2hRD αC
(82)
It is interesting to note that CC (PC ) is also a linear function
of the average power budget PC at the low SNR regime. The
hRD C(Pee5 hSR )
scaling factors (hSR +h
is the maximum EE for
RD )Pee5 +2hRD αC
the case of RAT-WDL.
2) High SNR Regime: Based on the results in (81), as PC →
∞, the average throughput for RAT-WDL at the high SNR
regime is asymptotically given as
2hSR hRD
1
(PC − αC ) .
(83)
CC (PC ) ≈ log2
2
hSR + hRD
SR hRD
(PC − αC ) is a linear function of PC . The
Note that h2h
SR +hRD
reciprocals of CC (PC ) and CB (PB ) are infinitesimal of the
same order when the average power budgets approach infinity.
Furthermore, it is obvious that the multiplexing gain of RATWDL is also 21 . Thus, RAT-WDL and RAT-DL are of similar
performances at the high SNR regime.
VI. N UMERICAL R ESULTS
In this section, simulations are performed to compare the
performances of the proposed optimal power allocation and
various suboptimal schemes.
• DLT: denotes direct link transmission, discussed in Section III-A, whose power allocation is given in Lemma
1.
• RAT-DL: denotes for relay assisted transmission with
direct link, discussed in Section III-B, whose optimal
power allocation is given in Proposition 2.
• MT: denotes mixed transmission, discussed in Section
IV-A, whose optimal power allocation is given in Proposition 4.
• RAT-WDL: denotes relay assisted transmission without
direct link, discussed in Section V-A, whose optimal
power allocation is given in Proposition 5.
• CDLT: denotes continuous direct link transmission, which
transmits only with the direct link every time slot. The
power allocation for CDLT is given as
(
P0 − αA P0 > αA
∗
PS =
(84)
0
otherwise.
10
6
1.1
4
3
DLT
RAT-DL
MT
RAT-WDL
CDLT
CRAT-DL
4.2
2
4
1
3.8
0
a R=0.16 W
1.05
Throughput (b/s/Hz)
Throughput (b/s/Hz)
5
a R=0.12 W
0
14
10
16
18
20
30
40
a R=0.2 W
a R=0.24 W
1
a R=0.28 W
0.95
0.9
0.85
0.8
1
1.5
P0 (W)
2.5
3
a R=0.16 W
1.05
Throughput (b/s/Hz)
Throughput (b/s/Hz)
0.8
3
a R=0.12 W
1.1
DLT
RAT-DL
MT
RAT-WDL
CDLT
CRAT-DL
1
2.5
(a)
(a)
1.2
2
hSR
50
0.6
a R=0.2 W
a R=0.24 W
1
a R=0.28 W
0.95
0.9
0.4
0.85
0.2
0.8
0
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
P0 (W)
(b)
Fig. 4. Average power budget vs. throughputs in: (a) high SNR regime; (b)
low SNR regime.
•
CRAT-DL: denotes continuous relay assisted transmission
with direct link, where the source transmits with the help
of the relay every time slot. The power allocation for
CRAT-DL is given as
(
(V, 2PB − 2αB − V ) P0 > αB
∗
∗
(PS , PR ) =
(85)
(0, 0)
otherwise,
1
1.5
2
hRD
(b)
Fig. 5. Channel gains vs. mixed transmission throughputs: (a) hSR vs. mixed
transmission throughput; (b) hRD vs. mixed transmission throughput.
DLT, RAT-DL, and RAT-WDL. At the low SNR regime, when
P0 = 0.5 W, throughput performance of RAT-DL/MT is about
0.3 b/s/Hz larger than that of DLT. Moreover, the performance
gap enlarges as P0 increases. RAT-DL, which coincides with
MT, outperforms other transmission schemes. It suggests that
RAT-DL is more energy efficient than DLT and RAT-WDL at
the low SNR regime.
where V is given in (46).
B. Channel Gains vs. Mixed Transmission Throughputs
A. Average Power Budgets vs. Throughputs
Fig. 4 compares the performances of several transmission
schemes at both high and low SNR regimes. The circuit power
consumptions are set as αA = 0.2 W, αB = 0.24 W, αC = 0.18
W. The channel gains are set as hSD = 1, hSR = 10, hRD = 3.
It is easy to see that MT always outperforms other transmission
schemes. In Fig. 4(a), when the average power budget P0 is
small, throughput curves of MT and RAT-DL coincide; when
P0 gets larger, throughput curves of MT, DLT and CDLT
coincide. At the high SNR regime, DLT and CDLT outperform
RAT-DL and CRAT-DL, which is due to the multiplexing gain.
Besides, the performance slope of RAT-DL and RAT-WDL are
similar, which proves our analysis in Section V-B. Fig. 4(b)
depicts the linear parts of CA (PA ), CB (PB ), and CC (PC ) in
In this subsection, MT throughputs are compared with
different channel gains. The channel gains are set as hSD = 1,
hRD = 2 for Fig. 5(a), and hSR = 2 for Fig. 5(b). The
average power budget is set as P0 = 1 W. The circuit
power consumptions are set as αA = 0.2 W, and αB =
0.12, 0.16, 0.2, 0.24, 0.28 W, respectively.
Fig. 5 shows that the increase in hSR and hRD leads the
optimal transmission type changing from the DLT to firstly
MT, and then RAT-DL. It is due to that the throughput of RATDL improves as hSR and hRD increases. The MT range is too
short to be seen in the figures, which is located near the turning
point. Besides, it can be concluded from the figures that as αB
increases, larger channel gains hSR or hRD are required for the
optimal transmission scheme to choose RAT-DL. Furthermore,
11
0.3
3
0.29
2.5
0.27
hRD
Throughput (b/s/Hz)
RAT-DL
0.28
0.26
2
h =1
0.25
SR
h =1.25
SR
0.24
0.23
hSR=1.5
MT
DLT
1.5
hSR=1.75
h =2
SR
0.22
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
1
0.35
a D (W)
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
h
SR
(a)
(a)
0.36
3
hSR=1
hSR=1.25
0.34
2.5
SR
RAT-DL
MT
h =1.75
SR
0.32
hSR=2
hRD
Throughput (b/s/Hz)
h =1.5
0.3
2
0.28
DLT
1.5
0.26
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
a R (W)
1
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
h
SR
(b)
(b)
Fig. 6. Circuit power consumptions vs. mixed transmission throughputs:
(a) αA vs. mixed transmission throughput; (b) αB vs. mixed transmission
throughput.
Fig. 7. Optimal transmission regions with different P0 : (a) P0 = 1 W; (b)
P0 = 2 W.
the unit throughput improvement by hSR is larger than hRD
when the optimal transmission type is RAT-DL.
C. Circuit Power Consumptions vs. Mixed Transmission
Throughputs
In this subsection, MT throughputs are compared with
different circuit power consumptions. The channel gains are
set as hSD = 1, hRD = 2, and hSR = 1, 1.25, 1.5, 1.75, 2,
respectively. The average power budget is set as P0 = 0.3 W.
Fig. 6(a) shows that the increase in αA leads the optimal
transmission type changing from the DLT to firstly the MT,
and then RAT-DL. It is due to that the throughput of DLT
deteriorates as αA increases. Fig. 6(b) shows that the increase
in αB leads the optimal transmission type changing from RATDL to firstly MT, and then DLT. It is due to that the throughput
of RAT-DL deteriorates as αB increases. The MT range is too
short to be seen in the figures, which is located near the turning
point. Besides, it can be concluded from the figures that as hSR
increases, the optimal transmission type will change to RATDL with fewer circuit power consumption αA for Fig. 6(a),
and the optimal transmission type will change to DLT with
larger circuit power consumption αB for Fig. 6(b).
D. Optimal Transmission Regions
In this subsection, the optimal transmission regions are
compared with different average power budgets P0 = 1 W
and P0 = 2 W. The circuit power consumptions are set as
αA = 0.2 W, αB = 0.24 W. The channel gain for the direct
link is set as hSD = 1.
Fig. 7 shows that as P0 increases, the regions of DLT and
MT expand, while the region of RAT-DL shrinks. It is due to
the multiplexing gain loss of RAT-DL at the high SNR regime,
which proves our analysis in Section IV-B.
VII. C ONCLUSION
In this paper, the throughput optimal power allocation for
a basic three-node relay channel with non-ideal circuit power
was studied. Two special scenarios for DLT and RAT-DL were
firstly investigated, and their corresponding average throughputs and characteristics were derived. Then, with the results
from these two special cases, the optimal power allocation for
the case with direct link was studied, which turns out to be
either a single type of transmission (DLT or RAT-DL) or a time
sharing of both transmissions according to specific average
power budget. Asymptotic analysis was also given to support
the results. At last, the optimal power allocation for RAT-WDL
12
was analyzed. Numerical results showed that the proposed optimal power allocation outperforms other suboptimal schemes.
A PPENDIX A
P ROOF OF P ROPOSITION 1
First, the average throughput CA (PA ) is obtained by taking
A
PS∗ = max (Pee1 , PA − αA ) and p∗ = P ∗P+α
into the objecA
S
tive function of problem (15). Next, it is easy to prove that
CA (PA ) in (16) is continuous over PA ≥ 0 by definition in
terms of limits of functions.
Then, examine the differentiability of CA (PA ). Since
CA (PA ) in (16) is obviously differentiable except for the
breakpoint PA = Pee1 + αA , only the differentiability at the
breakpoint PA = Pee1 + αA needs to be discussed. It is easy
to check that
CA (Pee1 + αA + a) − CA (Pee1 + αA )
lim
−
a
a→0
′
C (Pee1 hSD )
,
(86)
= lim− CA (Pee1 + αA + a) =
Pee1 + αA
a→0
CA (Pee1 + αA + a) − CA (Pee1 + αA )
lim
a
a→0+
′
hSD
.
(87)
= lim CA (Pee1 + αA + a) =
ln 2 (1 + Pee1 hSD )
a→0+
hSD
ee1 hSD )
According to (86) and (87), C(P
Pee1 +αA = ln 2(1+Pee1 hSD ) has to
hold for differentiability at the breakpoint PA = Pee1 + αA .
S hSD )
Since Pee1 , max C(P
PS +αA , it is easy to obtain
PS >0
d C (PS hSD )
dPS PS + αA
= 0,
(88)
PS =Pee1
which is equivalent to
hSD
C (Pee1 hSD )
.
=
ln 2 (1 + Pee1 hSD )
Pee1 + αA
(89)
Next, the continuity and differentiability of CB (PB ) is examined. Note that CB (PB ) in (53) is continuous and differentiable
except for the breakpoints
Pee4 (hSR − hSD )
Pee4
Pee2 + Pee3
+ αB ,
+
+ αB ,
PB =
2
hRD (1 + Pee4 hSD )
2
hSD V 2
UV
(91)
+ αB ,
+
2
hRD
where U and V are given in (36) and (46), respectively.
First, examine the continuity at the breakpoint PB =
+ αB . It is easy to check that
Pee2 +Pee3
2
lim
−
P +P
PB → ee2 2 ee3 +αB
lim
+
P +P
PB → ee2 2 ee3 +αB
CB (PB )
Pee2 + Pee3
hSD
1
hSD −
+
= C
2
2h
2
RD
1
Pee2 + Pee3
hRD
+ C
+
hRD −
2
2hSD
2
1
2
1
.
2
(93)
(94)
To check the continuity of CB (PB ) at the breakpoints PB =
+ αB , the right-hand sides of (92) and (93) must be
)+C(PR hRD )
for purpose of
equal. Denote f (PS , PR ) = C(PSPhSSD
+PR +2αB
exposition. Since (Pee2 , Pee3 ) =
max
f (PS , PR ), it is
Pee2 +Pee3
2
{PS >0,PR >0}
′
′
easy to obtain that fPS (Pee2 , Pee3 ) = 0 and fPR (Pee2 , Pee3 ) =
0, which are equivalent to
hSD (Pee2 + Pee3 + 2αB )
= C (Pee2 hSD ) + C (Pee3 hRD ) , (95)
ln 2 (1 + Pee2 hSD )
hRD (Pee2 + Pee3 + 2αB )
= C (Pee2 hSD ) + C (Pee3 hRD ) . (96)
ln 2 (1 + Pee3 hRD )
Substituting (95) into (96) leads to
hRD
hSD
=
,
1 + Pee3 hRD
1 + Pee2 hSD
(97)
which is equivalent to
(90)
and it follows that CA (PA ) is differentiable at the breakpoint
PA = Pee1 +αA . Thus, CA (PA ) is differentiable when PA ≥ 0.
At last, examine the concavity of CA (PA ). Since CA (PA )
is continuous and differentiable over PA ≥ 0, and first-order
condition is satisfied by the definition of CA (PA ) in (16), it is
a concave function [33].
Based on the above analysis, Proposition 1 is proved.
P ROOF
C (Pee2 hSD ) + C (Pee3 hRD )
,
2
(92)
Substituting (89) into (87) leads to
CA (Pee1 + αA + a) − CA (Pee1 + αA )
lim−
a
a→0
CA (Pee1 + αA + a) − CA (Pee1 + αA )
,
= lim
a
a→0+
CB (PB ) =
A PPENDIX B
OF P ROPOSITION 2
First, the average throughput CB (PB ) is obtained. By taking
the optimal solutions given in (52) into (25), the average
throughput CB (PB ) can be obtained as shown in Proposition
2.
hRD + Pee2 hSD hRD = hSD + Pee3 hSD hRD .
(98)
It is easy to obtain the following two equations from (98):
1
Pee2 + Pee3
hSD
hSD − = Pee2 hSD ,
+
(99)
2hRD
2
2
1
Pee2 + Pee3
hRD
hRD − = Pee3 hRD .
+
(100)
2hSD
2
2
Substituting (99)(100) into (93) leads to
lim
−
P +P
PB → ee2 2 ee3 +αB
=CB
CB (PB ) =
Pee2 + Pee3
+ αB ,
2
lim
+
P +P
PB → ee2 2 ee3 +αB
CB (PB )
(101)
and it follows that CB (PB ) is continuous at the breakpoint
ee3
PB = Pee2 +P
+ αB .
2
Next examine the differentiability of CB (PB ) at the break-
13
point PB =
Pee2 +Pee3
2
+ αB . It is easy to check that
ee3
+ αB + a − CB Pee2 +P
+ αB
CB
2
lim
a
a→0−
′
Pee2 + Pee3
= lim CR
+ αB + a
2
a→0−
C (Pee2 hSD ) + C (Pee3 hRD )
,
(102)
=
Pee2 + Pee3 + 2αB
Pee2 +Pee3
2
Pee2 +Pee3
2
CB
+ αB + a − CB
a
′
Pee2 + Pee3
+ αB + a
= lim CR
2
a→0+
lim
a→0+
=
1
2 ln 2
+
1
2
+
hSD
2hRD
hSD
ee3
+ Pee2 +P
hSD
2
!
hRD
1
2
+
hRD
2hSD
+
Pee2 +Pee3
2
Pee2 +Pee3
2
hRD
+ αB
(103)
.
Substituting (95)(96)(99)(100) into (103) leads to
ee3
ee3
CB Pee2 +P
+ αB + a − CB Pee2 +P
+ αB
2
2
lim
a
a→0−
Pee2 +Pee3
ee3
+ αB + a − CB Pee2 +P
+ αB
CB
2
2
,
= lim
a
a→0+
(104)
and it follows that CB (PB ) is differentiable at the breakpoint
ee3
PB = Pee2 +P
+ αB .
2
The continuity and differentiability at the other two breakpoints can be examined in similar ways, the proof is omitted
due to space limitations. Based on the above analysis, CB (PB )
is continuous and differentiable when PB ≥ 0. Besides, since
first-order condition is satisfied by the definition of CB (PB ),
it is a concave function [33].
Thus, Proposition 2 is proved.
P ROOF
A PPENDIX C
OF P ROPOSITION 4
It is worth to note that the objective function (54) is
θCA (PA )+(1 − θ) CB (PB ), which stands for any line segments
between any two points on line CA (P ) and CB (P ). Constraint
(55) gives the relationship between P0 and {PA , PB , θ}.
Thus, the optimization problem can be interpreted as finding
the maximum value of any line segments between any two
points on line CA (P ) and CB (P ) with specific x-coordinate
P0 .
In Case 1 and Case 2, CA (P ) ≥ CB (P ) over P > 0, i.e.,
the line segments are upper bounded by CA (P ). Thus, it is
obvious in these cases that (PA∗ , PB∗ ) = (P0 , 0). Besides, θ∗
can be obtained by substituting (PA∗ , PB∗ ) into (55).
In Case 3, as illustrated in Fig. 3, the domain is divided into
several intervals by the x-coordinates of the tangent points.
When P0 falls into the interval where the line segments are
upper bounded by CA (P ), the power should all be allocated to
DLT; When P0 falls into the interval where the line segments
are upper bounded by CB (P ), the power should all be allocated
to RAT; When P0 falls into the interval where the line
segments are upper bounded by the tangent line of CA (P ) and
CB (P ), the power value allocated for DLT and RAT are the
corresponding x-coordinates of the tangent points on CA (P )
and CB (P ), respectively.
With the above results, the optimal power allocation can be
easily obtained according to P0 as shown in Proposition 4,
and thus, Proposition 4 is proved.
A PPENDIX D
P ROOF OF P ROPOSITION 5
It is easy to check that objective function (76) is quasiconcave over PS , since it is a concave function divided
by a linear function [33]. It is increasing if 0 ≤ PC ≤
hSR +hRD
RD
> hSR2h+h
PS +αC . Thus,
2hRD PS +α
RD
C and decreasing if PC
RD
(PC − αC ) achieves the maximum
PS∗ = max Pee5 , hSR2h+h
RD
SR
PS∗ is obtained from
value of problem (76)–(77). PR∗ = hhRD
∗
PS hSR = PR hRD . Substituting PS and PR∗ into objective
function (76), the average throughput CC (PC ) for RAT-WDL
is obtained as (81). Thus, Proposition 5 is proved.
R EFERENCES
[1] C. Han, T. Harrold, S. Armour, I. Krikidis, S. Videv, P. M. Grant,
H. Haas, J. S. Thompson, I. Ku, C. Wang, T. A. Le, M. R. Nakhai,
J. Zhang, and L. Hanzo, “Green radio: radio techniques to enable energyefficient wireless networks,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Mag., vol. 49,
no. 6, pp. 46–54, Jun. 2011.
[2] G. Y. Li, Z. Xu, C. Xiong, C. Yang, S. Zhang, Y. Chen, and S. Xu,
“Energy-efficient wireless communications: tutorial, survey, and open
issues,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Mag., vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 28–35, Dec.
2011.
[3] S. Cui, A. J. Goldsmith, and A. Bahai, “Energy-efficiency of MIMO and
cooperative MIMO techniques in sensor networks,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas
Commun., vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1089–1098, Aug. 2004.
[4] ——, “Energy-constrained modulation optimization,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 2349–2360, Sep. 2005.
[5] C. Isheden, Z. Chong, E. Jorswieck, and G. Fettweis, “Framework
for link-level energy efficiency optimization with informed transmitter,”
IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 2946–2957, Aug.
2012.
[6] G. Miao, N. Himayat, and G. Y. Li, “Energy-efficient link adaptation
in frequency-selective channels,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 58, no. 2,
pp. 545–554, Feb. 2010.
[7] C. Xiong, G. Y. Li, S. Zhang, Y. Chen, and S. Xu, “Energy- and
spectral-efficiency tradeoff in downlink OFDMA networks,” IEEE Trans.
Wireless Commun., vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 3874–3886, Sep. 2011.
[8] S. K. Jayaweera, “Virtual MIMO-based cooperative communication for
energy-constrained wireless sensor networks,” IEEE Trans. Wireless
Commun., vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 984–989, May 2006.
[9] J. Xu and R. Zhang, “Throughput optimal policies for energy harvesting
wireless transmitters with non-ideal circuit power,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas
Commun., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 322–332, Feb. 2014.
[10] E. C. van der Meulen, “Three-terminal communication channels,” Adv.
Appl. Probab., vol. 3, pp. 120–154, 1971.
[11] T. M. Cover and A. A. E. Gamal, “Capacity theorems for the relay
channel,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. IT-25, no. 5, pp. 572–584, Sep.
1979.
[12] J. N. Laneman, D. N. C. Tse, and G. W. Wornell, “Cooperative diversity
in wireless networks: Efficient protocols and outage behavior,” IEEE
Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 50, no. 12, pp. 3062–3080, Dec. 2004.
[13] R. Pabst, B. H. Walke, D. C. Schultz, P. Herhold, H. Yanikomeroglu,
S. Mukherjeee, H. Viswanathan, M. Lott, W. Zirwas, M. Dohler, H. Aghvami, D. D. Falconer, and G. P. Fettweis, “Relay-based deployment
concepts for wireless and mobile broadband radio,” IEEE Commun.
Mag., vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 88–89, Sep. 2004.
[14] A. Nosratinia and A. Hedayat, “Cooperative communication in wireless
networks,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 74–80, Oct. 2004.
[15] G. Kramer, M. Gastpar, and P. Gupta, “Cooperative strategies and
capacity theorems for relay networks,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 51,
no. 9, pp. 3037–3063, Sep. 2005.
14
[16] A. Høst-Madsen and J. Zhang, “Capacity bounds and power allocation
for wireless relay channels,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 51, no. 6, pp.
2020–2040, Jun. 2005.
[17] Y. Liang, V. V. Veeravalli, and H. V. Poor, “Resource allocation for
wireless fading relay channels: Max-min solution,” IEEE Trans. Inf.
Theory, vol. 53, no. 10, pp. 3432–3453, Oct. 2007.
[18] T. C. Y. Ng and W. Yu, “Joint optimization of relay strategies and
resource allocations in cooperative cellular networks,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas
Commun., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 328–339, Feb. 2007.
[19] B. Rankov and A. Wittneben, “Spectral efficient protocols for halfduplex fading relay channels,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 25,
no. 2, pp. 379–389, Feb. 2007.
[20] J. Tang and X. Zhang, “Cross-layer resource allocation over wireless
relay networks for quality of service provisioning,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas
Commun., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 645–656, May 2007.
[21] O. Simeone, Y. Bar-Ness, and U. Spagnolini, “Stable throughput of
cognitive radios with and without relaying capability,” IEEE Trans.
Commun., vol. 55, no. 12, pp. 2351–2360, Dec. 2007.
[22] K. Jitvanichphaibool, R. Zhang, and Y. Liang, “Optimal resource allocation for two-way relay-assisted OFDMA,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol.,
vol. 58, no. 7, pp. 3311–3321, Sep. 2009.
[23] C. Huang, R. Zhang, and S. Cui, “Throughput maximization for the
gaussian relay channel with energy harvesting constraints,” IEEE J. Sel.
Areas Commun., vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 1469–1479, Aug. 2013.
[24] Y. Yao, X. Cai, and G. B. Giannakis, “On energy efficiency and optimum
resource allocation of relay transmissions in the low-power regime,”
IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 2917–2927, Nov.
2005.
[25] R. Madan, N. B. Mehta, A. F. Molisch, and J. Zhang, “Energy-efficient
cooperative relaying over fading channels with simple relay selection,”
IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 3013–3025, Aug.
2008.
[26] Z. Zhou, S. Zhou, J. Cui, and S. Cui, “Energy-efficient cooperative
communication based on power control and selective single-relay in
wireless sensor networks,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 7, no. 8,
pp. 3066–3078, Aug. 2008.
[27] G. Brante, M. T. Kakitani, and R. D. Souza, “Energy efficiency analysis of some cooperative and non-cooperative transmission schemes in
wireless sensor networks,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 59, no. 10, pp.
2671–2677, Jul. 2011.
[28] C. Bae and W. E. Stark, “End-to-end energy-bandwidth tradeoff in
multihop wireless networks,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 55, no. 9,
pp. 4051–4066, Sep. 2009.
[29] X. Zhou, B. Bai, and W. Chen, “Greedy relay antenna selection for
sum rate maximization in amplify-and-forward MIMO two-way relay
channels under a holistic power model,” IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 19,
no. 9, pp. 1648–1651, Sep. 2015.
[30] D. Wang, B. Bai, W. Chen, and Z. Han, “Achieving high energy
efficiency and physical-layer security in AF relaying,” IEEE Trans.
Wireless Commun., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 740–752, Jan. 2016.
[31] S. Zhou, A. J. Goldsmith, and Z. Niu, “On optimal relay placement and
sleep control to improve energy efficiency in cellular networks,” in Proc.
IEEE Int. Conf. Commun. (ICC), Kyoto, Japan, Jun. 5–9, 2011, pp. 1–6.
[32] H. Liang, C. Huang, Z. Chen, and S. Li, “Throughput maximization
for decode-and-forward relay channels with non-ideal circuit power,”
in Proc. IEEE Wireless Commun. and Networking Conf. (WCNC), San
Francisco, USA, Mar. 19–22, 2017, pp. 1–6.
[33] S. Boyd and L. Vandenberghe, Convex Optimization. Cambridge Univ.
Press, 2004.
| 7cs.IT
|
BECK’S CONJECTURE FOR MULTIPLICATIVE LATTICES
arXiv:1310.4594v1 [math.AC] 17 Oct 2013
VINAYAK JOSHI AND SACHIN SARODE
Abstract. In this paper, we introduce the zero divisor graph of a multiplicative lattice. We
provide a counter-example to Beck’s conjecture for multiplicative lattices. Further, we prove
that Beck’s conjecture is true for reduced multiplicative lattice which extends the result of
Behboodi and Rakeei [7] and Aalipour et. al. [1].
Keywords Zero-divisor graph, reduced multiplicative lattice, minimal prime element.
1. Introduction
In recent years lot of attention have been given to the study of zero divisor graphs of algebraic
structures and ordered structures. The idea of a zero divisor graph of a commutative ring with
unity was introduced by Beck [5]. He was particularly interested in the coloring of commutative
rings with unity. Many mathematicians like Anderson et.al. [3], F. DeMeyer, T. McKenzie
and K. Schneider [8], Maimani, Pournaki and Yassemi [20], Redmond [22] and Samei [23]
investigated the interplay between properties of the algebraic structure and graph theoretic
properties.
The zero divisor graphs of ordered structures are well studied by Halaš and Jukl [11], Halaš
and Länger [12], Joshi [13], Joshi et.al. [14, 15, 18, 19], Nimbhorkar et.al [21] etc.
In ring theory, the structure of a ring R is closely related to ideal’s behavior more than
elements. Hence Behboodi and Rakeei [6, 7] introduced the concept of annihilating ideal-graph
AG(R) of a commutative ring R with unity where the vertex set V (AG(R)) is the set of nonzero ideals with non-zero annihilator, that is, for a non-zero ideal I of R, I ∈ V (AG(R)) if and
only if there exists a non-zero ideal J of R such that IJ = (0) and two distinct vertices I and
J are adjacent if and only if IJ = (0) and studied the properties of rings and its annihilating
ideal-graphs. In [7], Behboodi and Rakeei raised the following conjecture.
Conjecture 1.1. For every commutative ring R with unity, χ(AG(R)) = Clique(AG(R)).
It is interesting to observe that the set Id(R) of all ideals of a commutative ring R with
unity forms a modular compactly generated 1-compact multiplicative lattice in which product
of two compact element is compact (see Definition 1.2) and the annihilating ideal-graph of a
commutative ring R with unity is nothing but the zero divisor graph of the multiplicative lattice
of all ideals of R where the vertex set is the set of non-zero zero divisors and vertices a and b
are adjacent if and only if ab = 0. Hence to study the annihilating ideal-graphs of commutative
ring with unity, a multiplicative lattice becomes a tool. This motivate us to define and study
Date: October 12, 2013.
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 05C15, Secondary 06A12.
1
2
VINAYAK JOSHI AND SACHIN SARODE
the zero divisor graph of a multiplicative lattice. It is natural to ask the following question and
the affirmative answer to this question solves Conjecture 1.1. of Behboodi and Rakeei [7].
m
Question: Is Beck’s Conjecture, that is, χ(Γm
i (L)) = Clique(Γi (L)) true for the zero divisor
graphs of a multiplicative lattice L with respect to an element i of L?
In this paper, we introduce the zero divisor graph of a multiplicative lattice. We provide
a counter-example to Beck’s conjecture for multiplicative lattices, particularly, a non-reduced
multiplicative lattice. Further, we prove that Beck’s conjecture is true for reduced multiplicative
lattice which extend the result of Behboodi and Rakeei [7] and Aalipour et. al. [1].
Now, we begin with necessary concepts and terminology.
Definition 1.2. A non-empty subset I of a lattice L is said to be semi-ideal, if x ≤ a ∈ I
implies that x ∈ I. A semi-ideal I of L is said to be an ideal if for a, b ∈ I, a ∨ b ∈ I. A proper
ideal (semi-ideal) I of a lattice L is said to be prime if a ∧ b ∈ I implies a ∈ I or b ∈ I. Dually,
we have concept of prime filter (semi-filter). A prime ideal (semi-ideal) I is a minimal prime
ideal (semi-ideal) if there is no prime ideal (semi-ideal) Q such that {0} $ Q $ I. A filter is
said to be maximal if it is a maximal element of the poset of filter.
For a ∈ L, the set (a] = {x ∈ L | x ≤ a} is called the principal ideal generated by a. Dually,
we have a concept of a principal filter [a) generated by a.
A lattice L is said to be complete, if for any subset S of L, we have
W
S,
V
S ∈ L.
A complete lattice L is said to be a multiplicative lattice, if there is defined a binary operation
“ · ” called multiplication on L satisfying the following conditions:
(1) a · b = b · a, for all a, b ∈ L,
(2) a · (b · c) = (a · b) · c, for all a, b, c ∈ L,
(3) a · (∨α bα ) = ∨α (a · bα ), for all a, bα ∈ L,
(4) a · b ≤ a ∧ b for all a, b ∈ L,
(5) a · 1 = a, for all a ∈ L.
W
An element c of a complete lattice L is said to be compact, if c ≤ α aα implies that
Wn
c ≤ i=1 aαi , where n ∈ Z+ . The set of all compact elements of a lattice L is denoted by L∗ . A
lattice L is said to be compactly generated or algebraic, if for every x ∈ L, there exist xα ∈ L∗ ,
α ∈ Λ such that x = ∨α xα , that is, every element is a join of compact elements.
A multiplicative lattice L is said to be 1-compact
if 1 is a compact element of L. A
multiplicative lattice L is said to be compact if every element is a compact element of L.
An element p 6= 1 of a multiplicative lattice L is said to be prime if a · b ≤ p implies either
a ≤ p or b ≤ p.
Equivalently, an element p 6= 1 of a 1-compact, compactly generated lattice L is said to be
prime if a · b ≤ p for a, b ∈ L∗ implies either a ≤ p or b ≤ p.
A nonempty subset S of L∗ in 1-compact, compactly generated lattice is said to be multiplicatively closed if s1 , s2 ∈ S, then s1 · s2 ∈ S.
BECK’S CONJECTURE FOR MULTIPLICATIVE LATTICES
3
As L is a complete lattice, it follows that L admits residuals: for every pair a, b ∈ L, there
W
exists an element (a : b) = {x | x · b ≤ a} ∈ L such that for any x ∈ L , x · b ≤ a ⇔ x ≤ (a : b).
Clearly, a ≤ (a : b) for all a, b ∈ L.
In a multiplicative lattice L, an element a ∈ L is said to be nilpotent, if an = 0, for some
n ∈ Z+ and L is said to be reduced, if the only nilpotent element is 0.
W
Let a be an element of a multiplicative lattice then we define a∗ = {x ∈ L | an · x = 0} and
W
if L is reduced, then a∗ = {x ∈ L | x · a = 0}.
A lattice L with 0 is said to be 0-distributive if a ∧ b = 0 = a ∧ c then a ∧ (b ∨ c) = 0; see
Varlet [24]. The concept of 0-distributive poset can be found in [17, 16].
2. Zero-divisor graph of a multiplicative lattice
Joshi [13] introduced the zero-divisor graph of a poset with respect to an ideal I. We
mentioned this definition, when a poset is a lattice.
Definition 2.1. Let I be an ideal of a lattice L. We associate an undirected and simple graph,
called the zero-divisor graph of L with respect to I, denoted by ΓI (L) in which the set of vertices
is {x 6∈ I | x ∧ y ∈ I for some y 6∈ I} and two distinct vertices a, b are adjacent if and only if
a ∧ b ∈ I.
We illustrate this concept with an example.
Example 2.2. The lattice L and its zero divisor graph Γ{0} (L) (in the sense of Joshi [13]) is
shown below.
1
❡
d❡
✡
❡
b✡
❡c a ❢
❢b
c
❡
d❡
a ❡
❡
0
L
(a)
❢
c
Γ{0} (L)
❡
❡
a m
b
Γ (L)
(b)
Figure 2
(c)
Now, we introduced the zero-divisor graph Γm (L) of a multiplicative lattice L and illustrate
with an example.
Definition 2.3. Let L be a multiplicative lattice and let i ∈ L. We associate an undirected
and simple graph, called the zero-divisor graph of L with respect to an element i, denoted by
Γm
i (L) in which the set of vertices is {x( i) ∈ L | x · y ≤ i for some y( i) ∈ L} and two
distinct vertices a, b are adjacent if and only if a · b ≤ i. Whenever i = 0, we denote Γm
i (L) by
simply Γm (L).
4
VINAYAK JOSHI AND SACHIN SARODE
Example 2.4. Consider the same lattice L shown in Figure 2(a) with the trivial multiplication
x · y = 0 = y · x, for each x 6= 1 6= y and x · 1 = x = 1 · x for every x ∈ L. Then it is easy to see
that L is a multiplicative lattice. Further, it’s zero divisor graph Γm (L) (in the multiplicative
lattice sense) is shown in Figure 2(c). It is interesting to note that if 1 is completely joinW
irreducible(i.e. 1 = xi ⇒ 1 = xi for some i) then any lattice with this trivial multiplication
is a multiplicative lattice.
Definition 2.5. The chromatic number of G is denoted by χ(G). Thus, χ(G) is the minimum
number of colors which can be assigned to the elements of G such that adjacent elements receive
different colors. A clique of a graph G is a complete subgraph and the supremum of the sizes
of clique in G, denoted by ω(G), is called the clique number of G.
For undefined concepts in lattices and graphs, see Grätzer [9] and Harary [10] respectively.
It is known that Beck’s Conjecture, that is, χ(ΓI (P )) = Clique(ΓI (P )) is true for the zero
divisor graph of a poset P (with 0) with respect to an ideal I of P ; see [13, Theorem 2.9] (when
I = {0}); see also [11, Theorem 2.13]). Hence it is natural to ask the following question.
m
Question: Is Beck’s Conjecture, that is, χ(Γm
i (L)) = Clique(Γi (L)) true for the zero divisor
graphs of a multiplicative lattice L with respect to an element i of L?
We answer this question negatively in the following example.
Example 2.6. Consider the lattice L depicted in the Figure 3(a). Define a multiplication
on L as follows. It is not very difficult to prove that L is a multiplicative lattice. Moreover,
f 2 = 0 for f 6= 0 shows that L is non-reduced. Now consider the zero divisor graph Γm (L) of
L depicted in Figure 3(b). It is easy to see that 4 = χ(Γm (L)) > Clique(Γm (L)) = 3. Thus
Beck’s Conjecture is not true in the case of multiplicative lattices.
❞1
b ∨ e(W)
tt
t
a ∨ d(R)
t
a∨c
t
a
t
a∨d
❞
b
❞
b∨d
c
b∨e c∨e
❞
❞
❏
❏
❏
❞ d ❏❞
❞
e (G)
a (R)
t
b (W)
t
(B)
t
t
f
a ∨ c(R)
c ∨ e(R)
e
t
t
t
t
t
c(R)
d(W)
t
t(R)
tb ∨ d(W)
tf
Γm (L)
❞
0
(R)-Red, (B)-Blue,(G)-Green, (W)-White
L
(a)
(b)
Figure 3
BECK’S CONJECTURE FOR MULTIPLICATIVE LATTICES
•
0
a
b
c
d
e
f
(a ∨ c)
(a ∨ d)
(b ∨ e)
(c ∨ e)
(b ∨ d)
t
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
0
f
0
f
f
0
0
f
f
0
f
f
f
a
b
0
0
f
0
f
f
0
0
f
f
f
f
f
b
c
0
f
0
f
0
f
0
f
f
f
f
0
f
c
d
0
f
f
0
f
0
0
f
f
f
0
f
f
d
e
0
0
f
f
0
f
0
f
0
f
f
f
f
e
f
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
f
(a ∨ c) (a ∨ d) (b ∨ e) (c ∨ e) (b ∨ d)
0
0
0
0
0
f
f
0
f
f
0
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
0
f
f
f
0
f
f
0
f
f
f
0
0
0
0
0
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
(a ∨ c) (a ∨ d) (b ∨ e) (c ∨ e) (b ∨ d)
5
t
0
f
f
f
f
f
0
f
f
f
f
f
f
t
1
0
a
b
c
d
e
f
(a ∨ c)
(a ∨ d)
(b ∨ e)
(c ∨ e)
(b ∨ d)
t
1
Remark 2.7. If R is a commutative ring with unity, then it is well known that the ideal lattice
Id(R) of R is 1-compact, compactly generated modular multiplicative lattice; see Anderson
[2]. Further, it is easy to observe that if R is reduced then Id(R) is a reduced multiplicative
lattice. The lattice depicted in Figure 3(a) is a non-modular lattice (as it contains a nonmodular sublattice shown in dark black circles) and hence it can not be an ideal lattice of any
commutative ring unity. Therefore the above conjecture remains open though Beck’s conjecture
fails in the case of non-reduced multiplicative lattices. We have more pleasant situation when a
multiplicative lattice is reduced. For this, we need Theorem 2.9 of [13]. Note that the notion of
prime semi-ideals mentioned in [13] coincides with the corresponding notions in lattices. Hence
we quote essentially Theorem 2.9 of [13], when a poset is a lattice and an ideal I = {0}.
Theorem 2.8 (Joshi [13]). Let L be a lattice. If Clique(Γ(L)) < ∞ then L has a finite number
of minimal prime semi-ideals and if n is this number then χ(Γ(L)) = Clique(Γ(L)) = n.
Lemma 2.9. Let L be a reduced multiplicative lattice. Then L is 0-distributive.
Proof. Let a ∧ b = 0 = a ∧ c for a, b, c ∈ L. Since a · b ≤ a ∧ b and L is a multiplicative lattice,
we have a · (b ∨ c) = 0. Further, L is reduced, we have a · b = 0 implies a ∧ b = 0. This together
with a · (b ∨ c) = 0 proves that L is 0-distributive.
It is proved in Joshi and Mundlik [16] that every prime semi-ideal in a 0-distributive poset is
a prime ideal of a 0-distributive poset. But for the sake of completeness, we provide the proof
of the same in the following result which is essential for the proof of the Beck’s Conjecture.
Theorem 2.10. Let L be a reduced multiplicative lattice and let Clique(Γm (L)) < ∞. Then L
has a finite number of minimal prime ideals and if n is this number then Beck’s Conjecture is
true, that is, χ(Γm (L)) = Clique(Γm (L)) = n.
Proof. Suppose L is a reduced multiplicative lattice. Then one can easily prove that whenever
a · b = 0 then a ∧ b = 0 and conversely for a, b ∈ L. By Lemma 2.9, L is 0-distributive.
6
VINAYAK JOSHI AND SACHIN SARODE
Now, we prove that every minimal prime semi-ideal of L is a minimal prime ideal of L. Let I
be a minimal prime semi-ideal of L. To prove I is an ideal, it is enough to show that for a, b ∈ I,
a ∨ b ∈ I. Let a, b ∈ I. Since I is a minimal prime semi-ideal of L, it is easy to observe that
L \ I is a maximal filter of L. Further, a, b 6∈ L \ I, we have [a) ∨ (L \ I) = [b) ∨ (L \ I) = L = [0).
Hence there exists t ∈ L \ I such that t ∧ a = 0 = t ∧ b. By Lemma 2.9, we have t ∧ (a ∨ b) = 0.
This proves that a ∨ b ∈ I, otherwise 0 = t ∧ (a ∨ b) ∈ L \ I, a contradiction to maximality of
L \ I. This proves that every minimal prime semi-ideal is a minimal prime ideal.
In view of the observation whenever a · b = 0 then a ∧ b = 0 and conversely for a, b ∈ L,
the zero divisor graph Γ(L) of the lattice L (in the lattice sense) is isomorphic to the zero
divisor graph Γm (L) of the reduced multiplicative lattice L. Since Clique(Γm (L)) < ∞, we
have Clique(Γ(L)) < ∞. Hence by Theorem 2.8, Beck’s Conjecture is true for general lattices
(in fact for posets); hence it is true for reduced multiplicative lattice, that is, χ(Γm (L)) =
Clique(Γm (L)) = n, where n is the number of minimal prime ideals of L.
Remark 2.11. It is obvious that the prime ideals in a commutative ring R with unity are
nothing but the prime elements of the Id(R). In view of this observation and the fact that
the annihilating ideal-graph AG(R) of a commutative ring R with 1 is nothing but the zero
divisor graph of a multiplicative lattice Id(R) of all ideals of a commutative ring R with 1,
Theorem 2.10 extend Corollary 2.11 of Behboodi and Rakeei [7] but not completely Theorem
8 of Aalipour et. al. [1]. In order to extend Theorem 8 of Aalipour et. al. [1], we have to
prove that χ(Γm (L)) = Clique(Γm (L)) = n, where n is the number of minimal prime elements
of a reduced multiplicative lattice L. We achieve this result in sequel. Before proceeding
further, we provide an example of a reduced multiplicative lattice which has prime ideals but
not have any prime element. It should be noted that a reduced multiplicative lattice always
has a prime ideal but need not have a prime element. Let N be the set of natural numbers.
Let L = {X ⊆ N | |X| < ∞} ∪ {N}. Then it is easy to see that L is a reduced multiplicative
lattice with multiplication as the meet. One can prove that the set {n}⊥ = {A ⊆ N | A ∩ {n} =
∅ and |A| < ∞} is a minimal prime ideal of L for every n ∈ N. But L does not contain any
prime element.
Lemma 2.12. Let L be reduced 1-compact, compactly generated lattice and x ∈ L if x∗ is
maximal among {a∗ | a ∈ L, a∗ 6= 1}, then x∗ is a prime element of L
Proof. Suppose that a · b ≤ x∗ and a x∗ . Then (x · a · b) = 0. Let (0 6= y) ≤ (x · a). Then
(b · y) ≤ (x · a · b) = 0. Thus b ≤ y ∗ . As y ≤ x implies x∗ ≤ y ∗ and y ∗ 6= 1 due to y 6= 0. By
maximality of x∗ , we deduced that y ∗ = x∗ , hence b ≤ x∗ . This proves that x∗ is prime.
Lemma 2.13. Let L be reduced 1-compact, compactly generated lattice. If x∗ , y ∗ are distinct
prime elements of L, then x · y = 0.
Proof. Assume contrary that x · y 6= 0, that is x y ∗ and y x∗ . Consider a compact element
t ≤ x∗ . Then x · t = 0. As y ∗ is prime and x · t ≤ y ∗ . Since L is compactly generated and every
compact element t ≤ x∗ is also ≤ y ∗ , we have t ≤ y ∗ and hence x∗ ≤ y ∗ . Similarly we can show
y ∗ ≤ x∗ . Hence y ∗ = x∗ , a contradiction.
BECK’S CONJECTURE FOR MULTIPLICATIVE LATTICES
7
Lemma 2.14. Let L be reduced 1-compact, compactly generated lattice with Clique(Γm(L)) <
∞, then the set {x∗ | x ∈ L, x 6= 0} satisfies the ascending chain condition.
Proof. Suppose a∗1 < a∗2 < a∗3 < a∗4 · · · ·. Let xj ≤ a∗j and xj a∗j−1 , j = 2, 3, · · ·. If we
let yn = (xn · an−1 ), n = 2, 3, · · ·, then yn 6= 0. For i < j, we have xi ≤ a∗i ≤ a∗j−1 . Thus
(xi · aj−1 ) = 0, consequently, (yi · yj ) = 0 for all i 6= j. Thus the set {yn | n = 2, 3, · · ·} is an
infinite clique, a contradiction.
Lemma 2.15. Let L be reduced 1-compact, compactly generated lattice with Clique(Γm(L)) <
∞, then the set of all distinct maximal annihilator elements of L is finite.
Proof. Let A = {x∗i | x∗i is maximal} be the set of all maximal annihilator elements of L.
Clearly, xi 6= 0 for all i and x∗i 6= x∗j whenever i 6= j. By Lemma 2.12, all the elements of A
are prime. Then by Lemma 2.13, xi · xj = 0 for all i 6= j. This shows Clique(L) ≥ |A|, which
according to Clique(L) < ∞ yields the finiteness of A.
Lemma 2.16. Let L be reduced 1-compact, compactly generated lattice with L∗ multiplicatively
closed set and Clique(Γm (L)) < ∞, then 0 is the meet of a finite number of minimal prime
elements of L.
Proof. According to Lemma 2.15, let {x∗i | 1 ≤ i ≤ n} be the set of all maximal annihilator
elements of L. By Lemma 2.12, all these elements are prime. Further, due to Lemma 2.13,
V
xi ·xj = 0 for all i 6= j. Assume that there is (0 6=)a ≤ 1≤i≤n x∗i . Then a·xi = 0 for all i. Thus
xi ≤ a∗ for all i. But by Lemma 2.14, a∗ ≤ x∗i for some i. However, this gives xi ≤ a∗ ≤ x∗i ,
V
that is, x2i = 0, a contradiction to reduced lattice. Thus we have, 0 = 1≤i≤n x∗i .
Now, we show that x∗i = pi are minimal prime elements of L. Since pi are assumed to be
maximal annihilator elements, we may suppose that none of pi contains pj for all i 6= j. Indeed,
if pj were not minimal for some j, then there exists a minimal prime element q with q < pj .
Vn
Now i=1 x∗i ≤ q and q is prime implies that x∗i ≤ q for some i. But then x∗i = pi ≤ q ≤ pj , a
Vn
contradiction. Thus i=1 pi = 0.
Lemma 2.17. Let L be reduced 1-compact, compactly generated lattice with with L∗ multiplicatively closed set and Clique(Γm(L)) < ∞, then every minimal prime element p of L is of the
form x∗ for some x ∈ L.
Proof. Let p be a minimal prime element of L. For x p, we have x∗ ≤ p. By Lemma 2.14,
there are maximal annihilator elements among A = {x∗ | x p}. In fact, we prove that there
is a greatest one. Let y1∗ , y2∗ be two maximal elements of A. We have y1 · y2 p, since p is
prime and y1 , y2 p. Thus there is (0 6= y) = (y1 · y2 ) with y p. Clearly, y1∗ , y2∗ ≤ y ∗ and
as both y1∗ , y2∗ are maximal in A, we conclude that y1∗ = y2∗ = y ∗ . This shows that A has the
greatest element say z ∗ .
By Lemma 2.12, z ∗ is prime. We prove that z ∗ ≤ p. If not then there is a compact element
g ≤ z ∗ such that g p. Then z ≤ z ∗∗ ≤ g ∗ ∈ A. Hence we have z ≤ g ∗ ≤ z ∗ , a contradiction
8
VINAYAK JOSHI AND SACHIN SARODE
to the fact that L is reduced. Thus z ∗ ≤ p and p is a minimal prime element of L, we have
p = z ∗.
Now, we prove Beck’s conjecture for reduced lattice L.
Theorem 2.18. Let L be a reduced 1-compact, compactly generated lattice with with L∗ multiplicatively closed set and Clique(Γm(L)) < ∞. Then the number of minimal prime elements
of L is finite, say n and χ(Γm (L)) = Clique(Γm (L)) = n
Proof. By the Lemma 2.16, we have 0 = ∧1≤i≤n pi for pi being minimal prime elements of
L and by Lemma 2.17, pi = x∗i for some xi 6= 0, hence 0 = ∧1≤i≤n x∗i . By Lemma 2.13,
{xi | 1 ≤ i ≤ n} is a clique in L and thus Clique(L) ≥ n. Define a coloring of L as
f (x) = min{i | x pi }. If x, y are adjacent vertices, then x · y = 0. If f (x) = k + 1, then
x ≤ pi for 1 ≤ i ≤ k and x pk+1 . So we conclude that y ≤ pk+1 , since x · y = 0 ≤ pk+1 and
x pk+1 . This show that f (y) 6= k + 1 and thus f (x) 6= f (y). Hence f is coloring of L. This
yields χ(Γm (L)) ≤ n, and finally n ≤ Clique(Γm (L)) ≤ χ(Γm (L)) ≤ n. In conclusion, we have
χ(Γm (L)) = Clique(Γm (L)) = n.
Corollary 2.19. Let R be a reduced commutative ring with unity such that Clique(AG(R)) <
∞. Then χ(AG(R)) = Clique(AG(R)) = |M in(R)|.
References
[1] G. Aalipour, S. Akbari, R. Nikandish, M.J. Nikmehrb and F. Shaveisi, On the coloring of the annihilatingideal graph of a commutative ring, Discrete Math. 312 (2012), 2620-2626.
[2] D. D. Anderson, Abstract commutative ideal theory without chain condition, Algebra Universalis 6 (1976),
131-145.
[3] D. D. Anderson and M. Naseer, Beck’s Coloring of a Commutative Ring, J. Algebra 159 (1993), 500-514.
[4] D. F. Anderson and P. Livingstone, The zero-divisor graph of a commutative ring, J. Algebra 217(1999),
434-447.
[5] I. Beck, Coloring of a commutative ring, J. Algebra 116 (1988), 208-226.
[6] M. Behboodi and Z. Rakeei, The annihilating-ideal graph of commutative rings I, J. Algebra Appl. 10(4)
(2011), 727-739.
[7] M. Behboodi and Z. Rakeei, The annihilating-ideal graph of commutative rings II, J. Algebra Appl. 10(4)
(2011), 741-753.
[8] F. DeMeyer, T. McKenzie and K. Schneider, The zero-divisor graph of a commutative semigroup, Semigroup
Forum 65 (2002), 206-214.
[9] G. Grätzer, General Lattice Theory, Birkhauser, Basel (1998).
[10] F. Harary, Graph Theory, Narosa, New Delhi (1988).
[11] R. Halaš and M. Jukl, On Beck’s coloring of posets, Discrete Math. 309 (2009), 4584-4589.
[12] R. Halaš and H. Länger, The zero divisor graph of a qoset, Order DOI 10.1007/s11083-009-9120-1.
[13] V. V. Joshi, Zero divisor graph of a poset with respect to an ideal, Order 29 (2012), 499-506.
[14] V. V. Joshi and A. U. Khiste, On the zero divisor graphs of pm-lattices, Discrete Math. 312 (2012),
2076-2082.
[15] V. V. Joshi and A. U. Khiste, On the zero divisor graph of a Boolean poset, Math. Slovaca (to appear).
[16] V. V. Joshi and N. D. Mundlik, Prime ideals in 0-distributive posts, Cent. Eur. J. Math. DOI
10.2478/s11533-013-0206-z.
[17] V. V. Joshi and B. N. Waphare, Characterizations of 0-distributive posets, Math. Bohem. (1)130 (2005),
73-80.
BECK’S CONJECTURE FOR MULTIPLICATIVE LATTICES
9
[18] V. V. Joshi, B. N. Waphare and H. Y. Pourali Zero divisor graphs of lattices and primal ideals, AsianEuropean J. Math. 5(3) (2012), 1250037 (9 pages).
[19] V. V. Joshi, B. N. Waphare and H. Y. Pourali On generalized zero divisor graphs of posets, Discrete Appl.
Math. 161 (2013), 1490-1495.
[20] H. R. Maimani, M. R. Pournaki and S. Yassemi, Zero-divisor graphs with respect to an ideal, Comm.
Algebra 34 (2006), 923-929.
[21] S. K. Nimbhorkar, M. P. Wasadikar, Lisa DeMeyer, Coloring of semilattices, Ars Comb. 12 (2007), 97-104.
[22] S. P. Redmond, An ideal based zero-divisor graph of a commutative ring, Comm. Algebra 31 (2003), 44254423.
[23] K. Samei, The zero-divisor graph of a reduced ring , J. Pure and Appl. Algebra, 209 (2007), 813-821 .
[24] J. Varlet, A generalization of notion of pseudo-complementness, Bull. Soc. Roy. Sci. Liége 36 (1968),
149-158.
Department of Mathematics, University of Pune, Pune-411007, India.
E-mail address: [email protected], [email protected]
| 0math.AC
|
QUASILINEAR QUADRATIC FORMS AND FUNCTION FIELDS OF
QUADRICS
arXiv:1710.09692v1 [math.AC] 26 Oct 2017
STEPHEN SCULLY
Abstract. Let p and q be anisotropic quadratic forms of dimension ≥ 2 over a field F .
In a recent article, we formulated a conjecture describing the general constraints which
the dimensions of p and q impose on the isotropy index of q after scalar extension to
the function field of p. This can be viewed as a generalization of Hoffmann’s Separation
Theorem which simultaneously incorporates and refines some well-known classical results
on the Witt kernels of function fields of quadrics. Using algebro-geometric methods, it
was shown that large parts of this conjecture hold in the case where the characteristic of
F is not 2. In the present article, we prove similar (in fact, slightly stronger) results in
the case where F has characteristic 2 and q is a so-called quasilinear form. In contrast to
the situation where char(F ) 6= 2, the methods used to treat this case are purely algebraic.
1. Introduction
Let F be a field, let p and q be a pair of anisotropic quadratic forms of dimension ≥ 2
over F , and let F (p) be the function field of the integral projective F -quadric defined by
the vanishing of p. The problem of understanding the isotropy behaviour of q after scalar
extension to the field F (p) is one which lies at the heart of many of the central problems
in the algebraic theory of quadratic forms. Let i0 (qF (p) ) denote the isotropy index (i.e.,
the maximal dimension of a totally isotropic subspace) of q extended to F (p). In [Scu17],
we formulated following conjecture which aims to describe the general constraints which
the dimensions of p and q impose on the integer i0 (qF (p) ):
Conjecture 1.1. Let p and q be anisotropic quadratic forms of dimension ≥ 2 over a
field F , and let s be the unique non-negative integer such that 2s < dim(p) ≤ 2s+1 . Set
k = dim(q) − 2i0 (qF (p) ). Then k ≥ 0 and
dim(q) = a2s+1 + ǫ
for some non-negative integer a and integer −k ≤ ǫ ≤ k.
Remarks 1.2. (1) Note that we do not impose any assumption on the characteristic of F ,
and we permit p and q to be degenerate in the characteristic 2 case.
(2) The assertion is trivially true if k ≥ 2s − 1, so we are interested in the case where
k ≤ 2s − 2.
(3) If q is non-degenerate, then i0 (qF (p) ) is equal to the Witt index of qF (p), i.e., half the
dimension of its hyperbolic part. For degenerate forms, however, one has to distinguish
between the isotropy index and Witt index. The reader is warned that our notation
differs from [EKM08], where i0 is used to denote the Witt index.
(4) If q is non-degenerate, then the integer k is just the dimension of the anisotropic
part of qF (p) . If q is degenerate (in which case char(F ) = 2), this need not be true.
Nevertheless, it is easy to check that k ≥ 0 in all cases (see Lemma 3.2 below).
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. 11E04, 14E05.
Key words and phrases. Quasilinear quadratic forms, function fields of quadrics, isotropy indices.
1
2
STEPHEN SCULLY
It is not hard to see that Conjecture 1.1 is optimal, to the extent that there can be no
further gaps in the possible values of dim(q) determined by i0 (qF (p) ) and dim(p) alone.
Simple examples are given in [Scu17, Ex. 1.5] and Example 4.5 below. From one point of
view, the rough content of the conjecture is the following: The more isotropic q becomes
over the field F (p), the closer dim(q) should be to being divisible by 2s+1 . This does not
capture the whole story, however; for example, when dim(q) ≤ 2s , the conjecture asserts
that q remains anisotropic over F (p), which is precisely the statement of the fundamental
Separation Theorem originally discovered by Hoffmann in [Hof95].
When char(F ) 6= 2, it was shown in [Scu17] that Conjecture 1.1 holds if any of the
following conditions are satisfied:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
k < 2s−1 ;
2s+1 − 2 ≤ dim p ≤ 2s+1 ;
p is a Pfister neighbour;
dim p ≤ 16;
dim q ≤ 2s+2 + 2s−1 .
Perhaps most interesting here is the case where k = 0, which tells us that if q represents
an element in the kernel of the natural restriction homomorphism W (F ) → W (F (p))
on Witt groups, then dim(q) is divisible by 2s+1 . This new observation can be refined
rather further ([Scu16b]), and perhaps raises some questions concerning the structure of
the former kernel (about which very little is known in general).
The results of [Scu17] are proved using methods from the theory of algebraic cycles,
with the decisive tool being the action of Steenrod operations on the mod-2 Chow rings of
certain smooth projective varieties. While the same ideas should, in principle, permit to
produce analogous results in the case where char(F ) = 2 and p and q are non-degenerate,
the absence of the mod-2 Steenrod operations in this setting renders this approach impractical at the present time. In fact, we currently have no practical approach to Conjecture
1.1 or other problems of its ilk for non-degenerate forms in characteristic 2.1 The purpose of the present article is therefore to deal with a special class of degenerate forms
in characteristic 2 known as quasilinear quadratic forms. Recall here that a quasilinear
quadratic form over a field of characteristic 2 is one which is diagonalizable, i.e., isometric to a form of the shape a1 x21 + a2 x22 + · · · + an x2n , the ai being scalars in the field of
definition. In characteristic 2, the projective quadric defined by the vanishing of such a
form is totally singular, in the sense that it has no smooth points at all. Nevertheless,
it was shown by Hoffmann and Laghribi (see, e.g., [HL04], [HL06], [Hof04]) that many
aspects of the classical algebraic theory of quadratic forms can be extended to the study
of quasilinear quadratic forms in characteristic 2. This was elaborated upon in work of
Totaro ([Tot08]) and the author ([Scu16a, Scu16b, Scu16c]), where quasilinear analogues
of various non-trivial results of Karpenko, Merkurjev, Vishik and others on discrete invariants of quadratic forms in characteristic 6= 2 were studied, and proved in many cases.
The methods employed here are of a rather different and more direct nature, and it is
unclear to what extent they can be adapted to treat other cases. In fact, the quasilinear
case is the only case in characteristic 2 where some of these results are known.2
In the present work, we continue this theme by proving the following result towards the
characteristic 2 case of Conjecture 1.1:
1All recent advances in the characteristic 6= 2 which rely on the use of Steeenrod operations or algebraic
cobordism theory remain open for non-degenerate forms in characteristic 2.
2For example, the analogue of Karpenko’s theorem on the values of the first Witt index – see [Scu16b].
QUASILINEAR QUADRATIC FORMS AND FUNCTION FIELDS OF QUADRICS
3
Theorem 1.3. Assume, in the situation of Conjecture 1.1, that char(F ) = 2 and q is
quasilinear. Then, the statement of the conjecture holds in the following cases:
(1) k ≤ 2s−1 .
(2) 2s+1 − 2s−2 − 3 ≤ dim(p) ≤ 2s+1 .
(3) p is a quasi-Pfister neighbour.
(4) dim(p) ≤ 8.
(5) 2N ≤ dim(q) ≤ 2N + 2s+1 for some non-negative integer N .
(6) dim(q) ≤ 2s+2 + 2s+1 .
The reader will note that the results proved here are very similar (in fact, slightly
stronger) than those proved in characteristic 6= 2 using completely different methods
([Scu17]). The proofs for the first three cases are given in §5 below, and for the last
three in §6. In all cases, the basic tool is [Scu16c, Thm. 6.6], which seems to have many
interesting applications to the study of quasilinear quadratic forms (see [Scu16c, §6]).
Before proceeding, we make the following important remark:
Remark 1.4. Suppose that char(F ) = 2. If, in the situation of Conjecture 1.1, q is quasilinear, then we can assume that p is quasilinear as well. Indeed, if p is not quasilinear,
then the quadric {p = 0} is generically smooth, and so the extendion F (p)/F is separably
generated. By [Hof04, Prop. 5.3], it follows that q remains anisotropic over F (p), and so
the statement of the conjecture holds trivially. When we speak of the quasilinear case of
Conjecture 1.1, we shall therefore mean the case where both p and q are quasilinear.
Conventions. All quadratic forms considered in this paper are finite-dimensional. Nondegeneracy and regularity of quadratic forms are defined as in [EKM08, pp. 42-43].
2. Recollections on quasilinear quadratic forms
For the rest of the paper, we fix an arbitrary field F of characteristic 2. Let ϕ be
a quasilinear quadratic form over F . The F -vector space on which ϕ is defined will be
denoted Vϕ . Given a field extension L/F , we write ϕL for the unique quasilinear quadratic
form on Vϕ ⊗F L which restricts to ϕ on Vϕ . If ψ is another quasilinear quadratic form
over F , then we say that ψ is a subform of (resp. is isomorphic to) ϕ if there exists an
injective (resp. bijective) F -linear map f : Vψ → Vϕ such that ϕ f (v) = ψ(v) for all
v ∈ Vψ ; in this case, we write ψ ⊂ ϕ (resp. ψ ≃ ϕ). If ψ ≃ aψ for some a ∈ F ∗ , then we
say that ψ and ϕ are similar. The orthogonal sum ψ ⊥ ϕ and tensor product ψ ⊗ ϕ are
defined in the obvious way. We say that ϕ is divisible by ψ if it is isomorphic to the tensor
product of ψ and another quasilinear quadratic form over F . If a1 , . . . , an ∈ F , then we
write ha1 , . . . , an i for the quasilinear quadratic form a1 x21 + · · · + an x2n on the F -vector
space F ⊕n . Every quasilinear quadratic form over F is isomorphic to one of this type.
From now on, the terms “quasilinear quadratic form” and “form” will be used interchangeably. For the reader’s convenience, we now quickly review some basic concepts and
results which will be needed in the main part of the paper. Detailed introductions to
the theory of quasilinear quadratic forms may be found in [Hof04] and [Scu16b], and the
unfamiliar reader is referred to these articles for further information.
2.A. Isotropic decomposition. Let ϕ be as above, and let W ⊂ Vϕ be the set of all
isotropic vectors in Vϕ , i.e., the set of all vectors v ∈ Vϕ such that ϕ(v) = 0. Since ϕ is
quasilinear, W is an F -linear subspace of Vϕ . Its dimension is the precisely the isotropy
index i0 (ϕ) described in §1. The restriction of ϕ to the quotient space Vϕ /W is called the
anisotropic part of ϕ, and is denoted ϕan . Note that we have
dim(ϕan ) = dim(ϕ) − i0 (ϕ)
4
STEPHEN SCULLY
(as opposed to the more familiar formula dim(ϕan ) = dim(ϕ) − 2i0 (ϕ) from the theory of
non-degenerate quadratic forms).
2.B. The representation theorem. We write D(ϕ) for the set {ϕ(v) | v ∈ Vϕ } of all
elements of F which are represented by ϕ. In this setting, the Cassels-Pfister representation
theorem ([EKM08, Thm. 17.12]) can be restated as follows:
Proposition 2.1 (see [Hof04, Prop. 2.6]). Let ψ and ϕ be quasilinear quadratic forms
over F . Then ψan ⊂ ϕan if and only if D(ψ) ⊂ D(ϕ). In particular, ψan ≃ ϕan if and
only if D(ψ) = D(ϕ).
2.C. Quasi-Pfister forms and quasi-Pfister neighbours. Let n N
be a positive integer.
We say that ϕ is an n-fold quasi-Pfister form if ϕ ≃ hha1 , . . . , an ii := ni=1 h1, ai i for some
a1 , . . . , an ∈ F . In this case, we have dim(ϕ) = 2n . For completeness, a 0-fold quasi-Pfister
form is a 1-dimensional form isomorphic to h1i. We say that ϕ is a quasi-Pfister neighbour
if ϕ is similar to a subform of a quasi-Pfister form π with dim(π) < 2dim(ϕ).
2.D. The norm form and norm degree. If ϕ is non-zero, then the norm field of
ϕ, denoted N (ϕ), is the smallest subfield of F containing the set {ab | a, b ∈ D(ϕ)}.
Explicitly, if ϕ ≃ ha0 , a1 , . . . , an i with a0 6= 0, then N (ϕ) = F 2 (a0 ai | 1 ≤ i ≤ n). In
particular, N (ϕ) is a finite extension of F 2 . The degree of this extension is called the
norm degree of ϕ, and is denoted ndeg(ϕ).
Clearly ndeg(ϕ) is a power of 2, and we write
lndeg(ϕ) for the integer log2 ndeg(ϕ) . Up to isometry, there exists a unique anisotropic
quasilinear quadratic form ϕnor over F such that D(ϕnor ) = N (ϕ) (existence is clear;
uniqueness holds by Proposition 2.1). The form ϕnor is called the norm form of ϕ, and
it is easy to see that ϕnor is in fact a quasi-Pfister form of dimension 2lndeg(ϕ) . If ϕ is
anisotropic, then it is similar to a subform of ϕnor by Proposition 2.1. In fact, in this case,
an anisotropic quasi-Pfister form over F contains a subform similar to ϕ if and only if it
contains a subform isomorphic to ϕnor . This readily implies the following basic result:
Lemma 2.2 (see [Scu16b, Cor. 3.11]). Let ϕ be an anisotropic quasilinear quadratic form
of dimension ≥ 1 over F , and let s ≥ −1 be the unique integer such that 2s < dim(ϕ) ≤
2s+1 . Then lndeg(ϕ) ≥ s+1, and equality holds if and only if ϕ is a quasi-Pfister neighbour.
2.E. Similarity factors. We write G(ϕ)∗ for the set {a ∈ F ∗ | aϕ ≃ ϕ} of all similarity
factors of ϕ. The basic result on similarity factors in the quasilinear setting is the following:
Proposition 2.3 (see [Hof04, Lem. 6.3]). Let ϕ be an anisotropic quasilinear quadratic
form over F and let a ∈ F \ F 2 . Then the following are equivalent:
(1) a ∈ G(ϕ)∗ .
(2) aD(ϕ) ⊂ D(ϕ).
(3) ϕ is divisible by hhaii.
.
(4) i0 (ϕF (√a) ) = dim(ϕ)
2
2.F. Function fields of quasilinear quadrics. We say that ϕ is split if dim(ϕan ) ≤ 1.
If ϕ is not split, then the projective F -quadric {ϕ = 0} is integral (see [Hof04, Lem. 7.1]),
and we write F (ϕ) for its function field. In this case, we also write F [ϕ] for the function
field of the affine F -quadric of the same equation. Clearly F [ϕ] is F -isomorphic to a
degree-1 purely transcendental extension of F (ϕ). Explicitly, if ϕ ≃ ha0 , a1 , . . . , an i with
a0 6= 0, then we have an F -isomorphism
q
−1
2
2
a0 (a1 X1 + · · · + an Xn ) ,
F [ϕ] ≃ F (X)
QUASILINEAR QUADRATIC FORMS AND FUNCTION FIELDS OF QUADRICS
5
where X = (X1 , . . . , Xn ) is an n-tuple of algebraically independent variables over F . The
form ϕ is evidently isotropic after scalar extension to F (ϕ) (or F [ϕ]).
2.G. The Knebusch splitting tower. We adapt an important construction of Knebusch
(see [EKM08, §25]) to the quasilinear setting: Let F0 = F , ϕ0 = ϕan , and inductively define
• Fr = Fr−1 (ϕr−1 ) (provided ϕr−1 is not split), and
• ϕr = (ϕFr )an (provided Fr is defined).
Since the dimensions of the ϕr become progressively smaller, this is a finite process, terminating at the first integer h(ϕ) for which ϕh(ϕ) is split; h(ϕ) is called the height of ϕ,
and the tower of fields F = F0 ⊂ F1 ⊂ · · · ⊂ Fh(ϕ) is called the Knebusch splitting tower
of ϕ. This construction can be used to characterize quasi-Pfister neighbours as follows:
Lemma 2.4 (see [HL04, §8] or [Scu16b, Cor. 3.11]). Let ϕ be an anisotropic quasilinear
quadratic form of dimension ≥ 2 over F . Then ϕ is a quasi-Pfister neighbour if and only
if ϕ1 is similar to a quasi-Pfister form.
If ϕ is not split, then for each 1 ≤ r ≤ h(ϕ), we set ir (ϕ) = i0 (ϕFr ) − i0 (ϕFr−1 ); ir (ϕ)
is called the r-th higher isotropy index of ϕ. If ϕ is anisotropic and s is the unique nonnegative integer such that 2s < dim(ϕ) ≤ 2s+1 , then it is known that i1 (ϕ) ≤ dim(ϕ) − 2s
(see [HL06, Lem. 4.1] or Theorem 2.8 below). If equality holds here, then we say that ϕ
has maximal splitting. By Lemma 2.4, anisotropic quasi-Pfister neighbours have maximal
splitting. The converse is not true, but we have the following assertion, the analogue of
which is still open for non-degenerate quadratic forms (even in characteristic 6= 2):
Theorem 2.5 (see [Scu16a, Thm. 9.6]). Let ϕ be an anisotropic quasilinear quadratic
form of dimension ≥ 2 over F and let s be the unique non-negative integer such that
2s < dim(ϕ) ≤ 2s+1 . If ϕ has maximal splitting and dim(ϕ) > 2s + 2s−2 , then ϕ is a
quasi-Pfister neighbour.
Finally, we will need to recall the evolution of the norm degree of a given form as one
runs over its Knebusch splitting tower:
Lemma 2.6 (see [Hof04, Lem. 7.12]). Let ϕ be a non-split quasilinear quadratic form
over F . Then lndeg(ϕ1 ) = lndeg(ϕ) − 1.
2.H. Divisibility indices. If ϕ is non-zero, then the divisibility index of ϕ is defined as
the largest integer d0 (ϕ) such that ϕ is divisible by an anisotropic quasi-Pfister form of
dimension 2d0 (ϕ) . We will need the following lemma, which is analogous to a well-known
fact from the non-degenerate theory (cf. [Kah08, Cor. 2.1.11]):
Lemma 2.7. Let ϕ and σ be quasilinear quadratic forms over F . If ϕ is divisible by σ,
then d0 ((ϕ)an ) ≥ d0 (σ).
Proof. Let π be an anisotropic quasi-Pfister form which divides σ. Then π also divides ϕ,
and hence ϕan by [Hof04, Prop. 4.19].
If ϕ is not split, then for each 1 ≤ r ≤ h(ϕ), we set dr (ϕ) = d0 (ϕr ); dr (ϕ) is called the rth higher divisibility index of ϕ. The fundamental result concerning the higher divisibility
indices of quasilinear quadratic forms is the first part of the following theorem:
Theorem 2.8 (see [Scu16b, Thm. 6.1]). Let ϕ be an anisotropic quasilinear quadratic
form of dimension ≥ 2 over F and let 1 ≤ r ≤ h(ϕ). Then
(1) ir (ϕ) ≤ 2dr (ϕ) .
(2) If ϕr−1 is not similar to a quasi-Pfister form, then ir (ϕ) is divisible by 2dr−1 (ϕ) .
6
STEPHEN SCULLY
Remark 2.9. Theorem 2.8 effectively determines all possible values of the Knebusch splitting pattern for quasilinear quadratic forms – see [Scu16b, §6]. In particular, it includes
the quasilinear analogue of Karpenko’s theorem on the possible values of i1 (−) ([Kar03]).
Note that the problem of determining the possible values of the Knebusch splitting pattern
for non-degenerate quadratic forms is wide open (even in characteristic 6= 2).
3. The invariant d(−)
Our approach to the quasilinear case of Conjecture 1.1 will be based on a certain
procedure which permits to lower not only the value of dim(p), but also the value of k.
In this section, we state and prove a technical lemma which will be needed to meet the
second purpose. In order to improve the readability of what follows, it will be convenient
to introduce notation which allows us to explicitly express the integer k as a function of
the pair (p, q). With this in mind, we make the following definition:
Definition 3.1. Given a quadratic form ϕ over a field (of any characteristic), we set
d(ϕ) = dim(ϕ) − 2i0 (ϕ).
Observe that if ϕ is non-degenerate (or even regular), then d(ϕ) is nothing else but the
dimension of the anisotropic part of ϕ. In general, however, this need not be the case.
For example, if ϕ is quasilinear, then the statement only holds in the trivial case where
ϕ is already anisotropic. In fact, d(−) can take negative values for sufficiently degenerate
forms. We do, however, have the following basic observation:
Lemma 3.2. If ψ and ϕ are anisotropic quadratic forms of dimension ≥ 2 over a field
K, then d(ϕK(ψ) ) ≥ 0.
. By [EKM08, Prop. 7.29 and Prop. 7.31], we
Proof. The claim is that i0 (ϕK(ψ) ) ≤ dim(ϕ)
2
′
have an orthogonal decomposition ϕ ≃ ϕ ⊥ ϕ′′ in which ϕ′ is non-degenerate and ϕ′′ is
quasilinear (if char(K) 6= 2, this means that ϕ′′ = 0). Moreover, it follows from [EKM08,
Lem. 8.10] that
dim(ϕ′ )
+ i0 (ϕ′′K(ψ) ).
i0 (ϕK(ψ) ) ≤
2
The problem is therefore reduced to the case where ϕ is quasilinear. If ψ is also quasilinear,
then a proof of the needed claim can be found in [Scu16b, Lem. 2.31 (1)]. If ψ is not
quasilinear, then K(ψ)/K is a separably generated extension (i.e., the quadric defined by
the vanishing of ψ is generically smooth). In particular, we have i0 (ϕK(ψ) ) = 0 by [Hof04,
Prop. 5.3], and so the statement holds trivially in this case.
Remark 3.3. Note that, in the statement of Conjecture 1.1, the integer k is nothing else
but d(qF (p) ). The lemma therefore confirms that k ≥ 0.
We now specialize to the quasilinear setting. As alluded to in the proof of Lemma 3.2,
anisotropic quasilinear quadratic forms remain anisotropic under separably generated field
extensions ([Hof04, Prop. 5.3]). In particular, we have:
Lemma 3.4. Let ϕ be a quasilinear quadratic form over F . If L is a separably generated
field extension of F , then d(ϕL ) = d(ϕ).
For later use, we will also need to observe the following interaction between d(−) and
the divisibility index invariant d0 (−) (see §2.H above):
Lemma 3.5. Let ϕ and ψ be anisotropic quasilinear quadratic forms of dimension ≥ 2
over F . Then d(ϕF (ψ) ) is divisible by 2d0 (ϕ) .
QUASILINEAR QUADRATIC FORMS AND FUNCTION FIELDS OF QUADRICS
7
Proof. Let ϕ ≃ π ⊗ σ, with π a quasi-Pfister form. We need to show that dim(π) divides
d(ϕF (ψ) ). There are two cases to consider:
Case 1. If πF (ψ) is isotropic, then (since π is a quasi-Pfister form) we have i0 (πF (ψ) ) =
dim(π)
2
(see [Hof04, Cor. 7.9]). In particular, we have
dim(ϕ)
dim(π)
dim(σ) =
.
2
2
By Lemma 3.2, it follows that d(ϕF (ψ) ) = 0, and so the statement holds trivially.
i0 (ϕF (ψ) ) ≥
Case 2. If πF (ψ) is anisotropic, then it is also a divisor of (ϕF (ψ) )an by [Hof04, Prop. 4.19].
Since
d(ϕF (ψ) ) = dim(ϕ) − 2i0 (ϕF (ψ) )
= 2dim (ϕF (ψ) )an − dim(ϕ),
(recall that dim(ηan ) = dim(η)−i0 (η) in the quasilinear setting) the claim again holds.
Our goal now is to prove Lemma 3.8 below. We first make two simple observations:
Lemma 3.6. Let σ, τ and φ be quasilinear quadratic forms over F such that σ ⊂ τ ⊂ ϕ.
Let a = dim(τ ) − dim(σ) and b = dim(ϕ) − dim(τ ). Then
(1) d(σ) ≤ d(τ ) + a, and
(2) d(ϕ) ≤ d(τ ) + b.
Proof. (1) Since σ is a codimension-a subform of τ , i0 (σ) ≥ i0 (τ )−a (intersect the subspace
of all isotropic vectors in Vτ with the image of Vσ under the embedding σ ⊂ τ ). Thus:
d(σ) =
=
≤
=
=
dim(σ) − 2i0 (σ)
dim(τ ) − a − 2i0 (σ)
dim(τ ) − a − 2(i0 (τ ) − a)
dim(τ ) − 2i0 (τ ) + a
d(τ ) + a.
(2) Since τ is a subform of ϕ, we obviously have i0 (ϕ) ≥ i0 (τ ). Hence
d(ϕ) =
=
≤
=
=
dim(ϕ) − 2i0 (ϕ)
dim(τ ) + b − 2i0 (ϕ)
dim(τ ) + b − 2(i0 (τ ))
dim(τ ) − 2i0 (τ ) + b
d(τ ) + b,
as claimed.
Lemma 3.7. Let σ and ν be anisotropic quasilinear quadratic forms over F and let ϕ =
(σ ⊗ ν)an .
(1) If a ∈ D(σ) is non-zero, then aν ⊂ ϕ.
(2) If b ∈ D(ν) is non-zero, then bσ ⊂ ϕ.
Proof. By symmetry, it suffices to prove (1). But if a is a non-zero element of D(σ), then
D(aν) = aD(ν) ⊂ D(σ ⊗ ν) = D(ϕ),
so the claim follows from Proposition 2.1.
8
STEPHEN SCULLY
We can now prove the following:
Lemma 3.8. Let σ and ν be anisotropic quasilinear quadratic forms over F with dim(ν) ≥
2, let ϕ = (σ ⊗ ν)an and let l = dim(ϕ) − dim(σ). Then l ≥ 0, and there exists an integer
0 ≤ i ≤ l such that
(1) d(σF (ν) ) ≤ i, and
(2) d(ϕF (ν) ) ≤ l − i.
Proof. Multiplying ν by a scalar if necessary, we can assume that 1 ∈ D(ν). We can then
write ν ≃ h1, a1 , . . . , an i for some a1 , . . . , an ∈ F . Let X = (X1 , . . . , Xn ) be an
pn-tuple
of algebraically independent variables over F , and set K = F (X) and L = K( ν ′ (X)),
where ν ′ (X) = a1 X12 + · · · + an Xn2 . The field L is F -isomorphic to the function field F [ν]
of the affine quadric defined by the vanishing of ν (see §2.F above). Now, since 1 ∈ D(ν),
we have σ ⊂ ϕ by Lemma 3.7 (2). In particular, we have l ≥ 0. We now claim that there
exists a form τ over K such that σK ⊂ τ ⊂ ϕK and d(τL ) = 0. If true, this implies (via
Lemma 3.6) that
(1’) d(σL ) ≤ i, and
(2’) d(ϕL ) ≤ l − i
for some 0 ≤ i ≤ l. This is equivalent to the assertion of the lemma, since (a) L is F isomorphic to F [ν], (b) F [ν] is F -isomorphic to a degree-1 purely transcendental extension
of F (ν), and (c) d(−) is invariant under purely transcendental base change (Lemma 3.4).
It thus remains to prove the existence of the form τ . Let σK ⊂ τ ⊂ ϕK . By definition,
)
we have d(τL ) = 0 if and only if i0 (τL ) = dim(τ
2 . Now τ is anisotropic (because ϕK is),
p
and we have L = K( ν ′ (X)). Thus, by Proposition 2.3, our task is to show that τ
can be chosen so that ν ′ (X)D(τ ) ⊂ D(τ ). We do this as follows: Consider the set S of
all subforms η of ϕK which contain σK as a subform and which have the property that
ν ′ (X)D(η) ⊂ D(ϕK ). This set is non-empty, since it contains σK by the definition of ϕ.
We take τ to be an element of maximal dimension in S. It now remains to show that
ν ′ (X)D(τ ) ⊂ D(τ ) for this choice of τ . Suppose, for the sake of contradiction, that this is
not the case. Then there exists a ∈ D(τ ) such that ν ′ (X)a ∈
/ D(τ ). Let τ ′ = τ ⊥ hν ′ (X)ai.
′
We will show that τ ∈ S, thus contradicting the maximality of τ . Note first that since
ν ′ (X)a ∈
/ D(τ ), τ ′ is anisotropic. Moreover, since ν ′ (X)a ∈ D(ϕK ), we have
D(τ ′ ) = D(τ ) + K 2 ν ′ (X)a ⊂ D(ϕK ),
so that τ ′ ⊂ ϕK by Proposition 2.1. Now τ ′ obviously contains σK as a subform (since τ
does), and so the final step is to check that ν ′ (X)D(τ ′ ) ⊂ D(ϕK ). But
ν ′ (X)D(τ ′ ) = ν ′ (X)D(τ ) + K 2 ν ′ (X)2 a
= ν ′ (X)D(τ ) + K 2 a,
and since both ν ′ (X)D(τ ) and K 2 a lie in D(ϕK ) (the former since τ ∈ S, and the latter
because a ∈ D(τ )), the claim is proved.
4. A refinement of the main conjecture in the quasilinear case
The quasilinear case of Conjecture 1.1 is known to hold in the extreme case where
k = 0. In fact, rather more is true in this situation. Recall from §2.D above that to any
anisotropic quasilinear quadratic form p over F , we can associate an anisotropic quasiPfister form pnor
which contains a subform similar to p. We write lndeg(p) for the integer
log2 dim(pnor ) . The following result is due (independently) to Hoffmann and Laghribi:
QUASILINEAR QUADRATIC FORMS AND FUNCTION FIELDS OF QUADRICS
9
Proposition 4.1 (see [Lag04, Thm. 1.5], [Hof04, Thm. 7.7]). Let p and q be anisotropic
quasilinear quadratic forms of dimension ≥ 2 over F . If i0 (qF (p) ) = dim(q)
2 , then q is
divisible by pnor . In particular dim(q) is divisible by 2lndeg(p) .
If s is the unique non-negative integer such that 2s < dim(p) ≤ 2s+1 , then lndeg(p) ≥
s+1, with equality holding if and only if p is a quasi-Pfister neighbour (Lemma 2.2 above).
The integer lndeg(p) thus measures how far p is from being a quasi-Pfister neighbour. If
p is “generic”, for example, lndeg(p) takes its largest possible value of dim(p) − 1:
Example 4.2. Consider the form p = hX0 , X1 , . . . , Xn i over the rational function field
F (X0 , X1 , . . . , Xn ). Then lndeg(p) = n. Indeed, pnor is isomorphic to the (evidently
anisotropic) quasi-Pfister form hhX0 X1 , X0 X2 , . . . , X0 Xn ii in this case.
Motivated by Proposition 4.1, we consider the following modification of our problem:
Problem 4.3. Let p and q be anisotropic quasilinear quadratic forms of dimension ≥ 2
over F , and let k = dim(q) − 2i0 (qF (p) ). Is is true that
dim(q) = a2lndeg(p) + ǫ
for some non-negative integer a and integer −k ≤ ǫ ≤ k?
In view of the above discussion, a positive answer to this problem for the pair (p, q) immediately implies that Conjecture 1.1 holds for the same pair of forms. Unlike Conjecture
1.1, however, one can only expect a positive answer to Problem 4.3 in certain situations.
This is already clear from consideration of the case where q = p:
Lemma 4.4. The q = p case of Problem 4.3 has a positive answer if and only if p is a
quasi-Pfister neighbour.
Proof. Suppose first that dim(p) = a2lndeg(p) + ǫ for integers a ≥ 0 and −k ≤ ǫ ≤ k. Since
q = p, we have
k = dim(p) − 2i1 (p) < dim(p).
This implies that a ≥ 1, so that
dim(p) ≥ 2lndeg(p) − k > 2lndeg(p) − dim(p).
In other words, we have
dim(p) > 2lndeg(p)−1 .
By Lemma 2.2, this is exactly what it means for p to be a quasi-Pfister neighbour. Conversely, if p is a quasi-Pfister neighbour, then p has maximal splitting (see §2.G above).
The reader will readily observe that this simply means that dim(p) = 2lndeg(p) − k.
Nevertheless, we can still hope for a positive answer in many interesting cases. In
particular, our main result (Theorem 5.7) is that if 2s < dim(p) ≤ 2s−1 , then Problem
4.3 has a positive answer as long as k ≤ 2s−1 . Taking Lemma 4.4 into account, we might
expect that this can be improved to k < 2s−1 + 2s−2 (but not further3) An improvement
which takes into account the precise value of dim(p) is given in Theorem 6.1 below.
We now give an example which shows that, in the quasilinear case, the statement of
Conjecture 1.1 is in some sense optimal. We work here with the norm degree invariant to
indicate that the same applies to all our results in the direction of Problem 4.3.
3When q = p, the inequality k < 2s−1 + 2s−2 implies that p is a Pfister neighbour (Theorem 2.5). This
need not hold, however, if k = 2s−1 + 2s−2 ; see [Hof04, Ex. 7.31].
10
STEPHEN SCULLY
Example 4.5. Let p be an anisotropic quasilinear quadratic form of dimension ≥ 2 over
a field E of characteristic 2. Let ϕ be the anisotropic part of pnor over E(p). By [Hof04,
Cor. 4.10 and Cor. 7.9], ϕ is a quasi-Pfister form of dimension 2lndeg(p)−1 . Moreover, there
exists a subform τ ⊂ pnor such that ϕ ≃ τE(p) by [Hof04, Lemma 5.1].
Choose a non-negative integer a, a non-negative integer k < 2lndeg(p) and let ǫ = k − 2l
for some integer 0 ≤ l ≤ k/2. Note that we have ǫ + l ≥ 0. Let X = (X1 , . . . , Xa+ǫ+l ) be
an (a + ǫ + l)-tuple of algebraically independent variables over E and let F = E(X). Let
σ be a codimension-l subform of pnor which contains τ , and consider
q = (pnor )F ⊗ hX1 , . . . , Xa−1 i ⊥ Xa σF ⊥ hXa+1 , . . . , Xa+ǫ+l i.
Since F/E is a purely transcendental extension, (pnor )F is anisotropic. It is then clear that
q is also anisotropic. Note that we have dim(q) = a2lndeg(p) + ǫ. We claim that dim(q) −
2i0 (qF (p) ) = k (here we write F (p) for F (pF )). Recall that ϕ denotes the anisotropic
part of (pnor )E(p) . By construction, ϕ is also the anisotropic part of σE(p) . Indeed, since
τ ⊂ σ ⊂ pnor , Proposition 2.1 implies that
ϕ ≃ τE(p) ⊂ (σE(p) )an ⊂ (pnor E(p) )an = ϕ,
whence the claim. Now, the form
η = (ϕF (p) ⊗ hX1 , . . . , Xa i) ⊥ hXa+1 , . . . , Xa+ǫ+l i
is obviously anisotropic, and is therefore equal to (qF (p) )an by the preceding discussion. In
particular, we have
dim(q) − 2i0 (qF (p) ) = 2dim(η) − dim(q)
= 2(a2lndeg(p)−1 + ǫ + l) − (a2lndeg(p) + ǫ)
= ǫ + 2l
= k,
as desired. Observe now that because F is a purely transcendental extension of E, replacing p by pF neither changes lndeg(p) nor the fact that p is anisotropic ([Hof04, Prop.
5.3]). Moreover, the initial
pair (E, p) can be chosen so that lndeg(p) takes any prescribed
value ≥ log2 dim(p) . The example therefore shows that as far as the quasilinear case
of Conjecture 1.1 is concerned, the integers i0 (qF (p) ) and dim(p) cannot by themselves
determine any further gaps in the possible values of dim(q).
In what follows, we will mainly consider the statement formulated in Problem 4.3, as
opposed to the statement of Conjecture 1.1. Before proceeding to the proofs of our main
results, it will be useful to record the following trivial reformulation of the former:
Lemma 4.6. Problem 4.3 admits a positive answer if and only if there exists a nonnegative integer a such that
i0 (qF (p) ) ≤ a2lndeg(p)−1 ≤ dim(q) − i0 (qF (p) ).
Proof. For any integer a, we have
−k ≤ dim(q) − a2ndeg(p) ≤ k
⇔ −dim(q) + 2i0 (qF (p) ) ≤ dim(q) − a2ndeg(p) ≤ dim(q) − 2i0 (qF (p) )
⇔
2i0 (qF (p) ) ≤ 2(dim(q) − a2ndeg(p)−1 ) ≤ 2(dim(q) − i0 (qF (p) ))
⇔
i0 (qF (p) ) ≤ a2lndeg(p)−1 ≤ dim(q) − i0 (qF (p) ),
whence the claim.
QUASILINEAR QUADRATIC FORMS AND FUNCTION FIELDS OF QUADRICS
11
Remarks 4.7. (1) By Lemma 2.6, the integer lndeg(p) − 1 appearing as the exponent of
the 2-power here is equal to lndeg(p1 ). We will use this fact in the sequel.
(2) It follows from [Hof04, Prop. 5.3] that the answer to Problem 4.3 is invariant under
replacing F with a separably generated (e.g., purely transcendental) extension of itself.
5. Main results
We are now ready to prove our main results towards the quasilinear case of Conjecture
1.1. Our approach rests on the following key result from [Scu16c]:
Theorem 5.1 ([Scu16c, Thm. 6.6]). Let ψ and ϕ be anisotropic quasilinear quadratic
forms of dimension ≥ 2 over F such that ϕF (ψ) is isotropic. Then, after possibly replacing
F with a purely transcendental extension of itself F , there exists an anisotropic quasilinear
quadratic form τ over F such that
(τ ⊗ ψ1 )an ⊂ (ϕF (ψ) )an
and
dim(τ ) ≥ i0 (ϕF (ψ) ).
As shown in [Scu16c, §6], Theorem 5.1 has many applications in the theory of quasilinear
quadratic forms. The present article represents another demonstration of its range. First,
we observe that it immediately implies the following:
Proposition 5.2. Problem 4.3 has a positive answer if p is a quasi-Pfister neighbour. In
particular, the quasilinear case of Conjecture 1.1 holds when p is a quasi-Pfister neighbour.
Proof. Let s be the unique non-negative integer such that 2s < dim(p) ≤ 2s+1 . Since p is
a quasi-Pfister neighbour, we have lndeg(ϕ) = s + 1. If qF (p) is anisotropic then conjecture
holds trivially, so let us suppose otherwise. By Theorem 5.1 and Remark 4.7 (2), we may
then assume that there exists an anisotropic form τ over F (p) such that dim(τ ) = i0 (qF (p) )
and (τ ⊗ p1 )an ⊂ (qF (p) )an . On the other hand, τ is similar to a subform of (τ ⊗ p1 )an by
Lemma 3.7 (2). We therefore have inequalities
dim(τ ) ≤ dim (τ ⊗ p1 )an ≤ dim (qF (p) )an ,
or, in other words,
i0 (qF (p) ) ≤ dim (τ ⊗ p1 )an ≤ dim(q) − i0 (qF (p) ).
Now, since p is a quasi-Pfister neighbour, p1 is similar to an s-fold Pfister form (Lemma 2.4
above). By [Hof04,
Prop. 4.19], it follows that (τ ⊗ p1 )an is divisible by p1 . In particular,
dim (τ ⊗ p1 )an is divisible by 2s . Thus, by the preceding discussion, there exists a positive
integer a such that
i0 (qF (p) ) ≤ a2s ≤ dim(q) − i0 (qF (p) ).
By Lemma 4.6 and the fact that lndeg(p) = s + 1, this is exactly what we wanted.
Now, while the general case seems to be more complicated, Theorem 5.1 at least permits
us to set up an inductive approach to Problem 4.3. The basic step is the following lemma:
Lemma 5.3. Let ψ be an anisotropic quasilinear quadratic form of dimension ≥ 2 over
a field L of characteristic 2, let 0 < m < 2lndeg(ψ)−2 , and let m′ be the largest integer
strictly less than m which is divisible by 2d1 (ψ) . If Problem 4.3 has a positive answer when
F = L(ψ), p = ψ1 and k ≤ m′ , then it also has a positive answer when F = L, p = ψ and
k ≤ m.
Remark 5.4. We remind the reader that d1 (ψ) denotes the largest integer r such that ψ1
is divisible by an anisotropic r-fold quasi-Pfister form (see §2.H above).
12
STEPHEN SCULLY
Proof. To simplify the notation, let L1 = L(ψ). We make the stated assumption regarding
Problem 4.3 in the case where F = L1 and p = ψ1 . Let q be an anisotropic quasilinear
quadratic form of dimension ≥ 2 over L such that k = d(qL1 ) ≤ m. Our aim is to show
that dim(q) = a2lndeg(p) +ǫ for some integers a ≥ 0 and −k ≤ ǫ ≤ k. In view of Proposition
4.1, we can assume that k > 0. If qL1 is anisotropic, then the statement holds trivially.
If not, then Theorem 5.1 and Remark 4.7 (2) allow us to assume that there exists an
anisotropic form τ over L1 such that dim(τ ) = i0 (qL1 ) and (τ ⊗ ψ1 )an ⊂ (qL1 )an . Now, by
Lemma 4.6 and Remark 4.7 (1), proving our assertion amounts to showing that
i0 (qL1 ) ≤ a2lndeg(ψ1 ) ≤ dim(q) − i0 (qL1 )
for some non-negative integer a, or, equivalently, that
dim(τ ) ≤ a2lndeg(ψ1 ) ≤ dim((qL1 )an )
(5.1)
for some non-negative integer a. We will work with the latter formulation. Let ϕ =
(τ ⊗ ψ1 )an and let l = dim(ϕ) − dim(τ ). By Lemma 3.8, we have that
(1) d(τL1 (ψ1 ) ) ≤ i, and
(2) d(ϕL1 (ψ1 ) ) ≤ l − i
for some integer 0 ≤ i ≤ l (recall here that l ≥ 0 because τ is similar to a subform of ϕ).
We now have three cases to consider:
Case 1. If i = 0, then Proposition 4.1 tells us that dim(τ ) is divisible by 2lndeg(ψ1 ) . Thus,
(5.1) certainly holds for some positive integer a in this case.
Case 2. If i = l, then Proposition 4.1 tells us that dim(ϕ) is divisible by 2lndeg(ψ1 ) . Since
dim(τ ) ≤ dim(ϕ) ≤ dim((qL1 )an ),
(5.1) also holds for some positive integer a in this case.
Case 3. Suppose now that 0 < i < l. We claim that d(τL1 (ψ1 ) ) and d(ϕL1 (ψ1 ) ) are both
≤ m′ (recall that m′ is the largest integer < m which is divisible by 2d1 (ψ) ). First, we have
l =
≤
=
=
dim(ϕ) − dim(τ )
dim((qL1 )an ) − i0 (qL1 )
dim(q) − 2i0 (qL1 )
k
In particular, since i > 0, we have that d(ϕL1 (ψ1 ) ) < l ≤ k ≤ m. On the other hand
d(ϕL1 (ψ1 ) ) is divisible by 2d0 (ϕ) by Lemma 3.5. Since d0 (ϕ) ≥ d0 (ψ1 ) = d1 (ψ) (Lemma
2.7), we conclude that d(ϕL1 (ψ1 ) ) is divisible by 2d1 (ψ) , and is therefore ≤ m′ . This
argument also proves the claim about d(τL1 (ψ1 ) ) = i. Indeed, if i > m′ , then l − i < 2d1 (ψ)
by the definition of m′ and the fact that l ≤ m. Since d(ϕL1 (ψ1 ) ) = l − i is divisible by
2d1 (ψ) , this implies that l − i = 0, contradicting our assumption. Now, since d(τL1 (ψ1 ) ) and
d(ϕL1 (ψ1 ) ) are both ≤ m′ , we can invoke our initial hypothesis to get that
dim(τ ) = b2lndeg(ψ1 ) + ǫ1
and
dim(ϕ) = c2lndeg(ψ1 ) + ǫ2
QUASILINEAR QUADRATIC FORMS AND FUNCTION FIELDS OF QUADRICS
13
for some non-negative integers b, c and some integers −i ≤ ǫ1 ≤ i and i − l ≤ ǫ2 ≤ l − i. If
ǫ1 ≤ 0, then
dim(τ ) ≤
≤
≤
=
≤
b2lndeg(ψ1 )
dim(τ ) + i
dim(τ ) + l
dim(ϕ)
dim((qL1 )an ),
and so (5.1) holds with a = b. Similarly, if ǫ2 ≥ 0, then one immediately checks that (5.1)
holds with a = c. Finally, suppose that ǫ1 > 0 and ǫ2 < 0. Since dim(ϕ) ≥ dim(τ ), we
then have that c > b. In particular,
2lndeg(ψ1 ) ≤ (c − b)2lndeg(ψ1 )
= dim(ϕ) − dim(τ ) + (ǫ1 − ǫ2 )
≤ l + i + (l − i)
= 2l.
This is impossible, however. Indeed, we noted above that l ≤ m, and since m < 2lndeg(ψ)−2 ,
we have (using Lemma 2.6) that
2l < 2lndeg(ψ)−1 = 2lndeg(ψ1 ) .
We conclude that this case cannot occur, and so the lemma is proved.
Recall from [Scu16b, §2.K] that the quasi-Pfister height of a quasilinear quadratic form
ϕ is defined as the smallest non-negative integer hqp (ϕ) such that ϕhqp (ϕ) is similar to a
quasi-Pfister form. The previous lemma now implies:
Proposition 5.5. Problem 4.3 has a positive answer in the case where k < dim(phqp (p) ).
Proof. Let r = hqp (p). We argue by induction on r. If r ≤ 1, then p is a quasi-Pfister
neighbour (Lemma 2.4) and the statement holds by Proposition 5.2. Assume now that
r ≥ 2. Then lndeg(p) ≥ lndeg(pr ) + 2 by Lemma 2.6. In particular, since pr is a quasiPfister form, we have
k < dim(pr ) = 2lndeg(pr ) ≤ 2lndeg(p)−2 .
In particular, by applying Lemma 5.3 in the case where L = F and ψ = p, we can achieve
a reduction in r without changing the assumption on k (the exchange p → p1 does not
change dim(phqp (p) )). The result follows.
The idea now is to examine Problem 4.3 by repeatedly applying Lemma 5.3 over the
Knebusch splitting tower of p. In order to get something concrete out of this, however,
we require some non-trivial information concerning the possible evolution of p as we pass
over this tower. Fortunately, such information is available in the form of Theorems 2.5
and 2.8, and this leads us to the following observation:
Proposition 5.6. Let s be a positive integer and let 0 ≤ m < 2s . Suppose that Problem
4.3 has a positive answer whenever k < m. Then it also has a positive answer in the
situation where 2s < dim(p) ≤ 2s+1 and k ≤ min(m + dim(p) − 2s − 2s−2 , 2s − 1).
Proof. Suppose that 2s < dim(p) ≤ 2s+1 and let k ≤ min(m + dim(p) − 2s − 2s−2 , 2s − 1).
By the discussion in §2.G, there exists an integer 0 < r < h(p) such that dim(pr ) = 2s .
If pr is a quasi-Pfister form, then dim(phqp (p) ) ≥ 2s . Since k < 2s , the statement follows
14
STEPHEN SCULLY
from Proposition 5.5 in this case. Suppose now that pr is not a quasi-Pfister form. Then
lndeg(pr ) ≥ s + 1. In particular, if 0 ≤ i < r, then we have
2lndeg(pi )−2 ≥ 2s+2−2 = 2s > k
(see Lemma 2.6). Thus, repeatedly applying Lemma 5.3 over the Knebusch splitting
tower (Fi ) of p (specifically, consider the sequence (F, p) → (F1 , p1 ) → (F2 , p2 ) → · · · →
(Fr−1 , pr−1 )), there exists a descending sequence of integers m1 > m2 > · · · > mr such
that
(1) m1 < k.
(2) For each 1 ≤ i ≤ r, mi is divisible by 2di (p) .
(3) If Problem 4.3 has a positive answer for the triple (Fr , pr , mr ), then it also has a
positive answer for the triple (F, p, k).
In view of our initial hypothesis, it now only remains to show that mr < m. Note first
that dj+1 (p) ≥ dj (p) for each 1 ≤ j < r (see Theorem 2.8). In particular, (2) implies that,
for each such j, mj − mj−1 is a positive integer divisible by 2dj (p) . Together with (1), we
therefore have
r−1
r−1
X
X
2dj (p) .
(mj − mj+1 ) < k −
mr = m1 −
j=1
We now invoke Theorem 2.8 (1), which tells us that
particular, we have
mr < k −
r−1
X
j=1
2dj (p)
≥ ij (p) for all j < r. In
ij (p)
j=1
= k − dim(p) − dim(pr−1 )
≤ m + dim(p) − 2s − 2s−2 − dim(p) + dim(pr−1 )
= m + dim(pr−1 ) − 2s − 2s−2
Thus, to complete the proof, it suffices to show that dim(pr−1 ) ≤ 2s + 2s−2 . To see that
this is indeed true, note first that pr−1 has maximal splitting (see §2.G above) by the very
definition of r. On the other hand, since pr is not similar to a quasi-Pfister form, pr−1
is not a quasi-Pfister neighbour by Lemma 2.4. The needed conclusion therefore follows
from Theorem 2.5.
An easy induction now yields our main result:
Theorem 5.7. Let p and q be anisotropic quasilinear quadratic forms of dimension ≥ 2
over F , let s be the unique non-negative integer such that 2s < dim(p) ≤ 2s+1 , and let
k = dim(q) − 2i0 (qF (p) ). If k ≤ 2s−1 , then
dim(q) = a2lndeg(p) + ǫ
for some non-negative integer a and integer −k ≤ ǫ ≤ k. In particular, the quasilinear
case of Conjecture 1.1 holds when k ≤ 2s−1 .
Proof. We argue by induction on dim(p). If dim(p) ≤ 2, then the statement holds by
Proposition 4.1. Assume now that dim(p) ≥ 3. If lndeg(p) = s + 1, then p is a quasiPfister neighbour (Lemma 2.2) and we can invoke Proposition 5.2. We can therefore
assume that lndeg(p) ≥ s + 2 (again, see Lemma 2.2). In particular, we have
k ≤ 2s−1 < 2lndeg(p)−2 .
QUASILINEAR QUADRATIC FORMS AND FUNCTION FIELDS OF QUADRICS
15
Thus, by Lemma 5.3, it suffices to prove the following: If ϕ is an anisotropic quasilinear
quadratic form over L = F (p), and k′ = dim(ϕ) − 2i0 (ϕL(p1 ) ) < 2s−1 , then dim(ϕ) =
b2lndeg(p1 ) + ǫ′ for some non-negative integer b and some integer −k′ ≤ ǫ′ ≤ k′ . Now, by
the discussion of §2.G, we have dim(p1 ) ≥ 2s . If this inequality is strict, then we are done
by the induction hypothesis. If dim(p1 ) = 2s , the induction hypothesis at least tells us
that the claim holds when k′ ≤ 2s−2 . But, by Proposition 5.6, the claim then holds when
k′ ≤ min(2s−2 + 1 + dim(p) − 2s−1 − 2s−3 , 2s−1 − 1)
= min(2s−2 + 1 + dim(2s ) − 2s−1 − 2s−3 , 2s−1 − 1)
= min(2s−1 + 2s−3 + 1, 2s−1 − 1)
= 2s−1 − 1,
and so the theorem is proved.
Feeding this back into Proposition 5.6 now gives the following additional result in the
direction of our conjecture:
Corollary 5.8. Let p and q be anisotropic quasilinear quadratic forms of dimension ≥ 2
over F , let s be the unique non-negative integer such that 2s < dim(p) ≤ 2s+1 , and let
k = dim(q) − 2i0 (qF (p) ). If k ≤ min(dim(p) − 2s−1 − 2s−2 + 1, 2s − 1), then
dim(q) = a2lndeg(p) + ǫ
for some non-negative integer a and integer −k ≤ ǫ ≤ k. In particular, the quasilinear
case of Conjecture 1.1 holds when k ≤ min(dim(p) − 2s−1 − 2s−2 + 1, 2s − 1).
Proof. By Theorem 5.7, the result holds if k < 2s−1 + 1. Since
2s−1 + 1 + dim(p) − 2s − 2s−2 = dim(p) − 2s−1 − 2s−2 + 1,
the claim now follows from Proposition 5.6.
In particular, we get that the quasilinear case of Conjecture 1.1 holds when dim(p) is
close enough to 2s+1 :
Corollary 5.9. The quasilinear case of Conjecture 1.1 holds when
2s+1 − 2s−2 − 3 ≤ dim(p) ≤ 2s+1 .
Proof. It is enough to show that the statement of the conjecture holds when k ≤ 2s − 2
(Remark 1.2 (2)). But if dim(p) ≥ 2s+1 − 2s−2 − 3, then
dim(p) − 2s−2 − 2s−2 + 1 ≥ 2s − 2,
and since lndeg(p) ≥ s + 1, the claim follows from Corollary 5.8.
Corollary 5.10. The quasilinear case of Conjecture 1.1 holds when dim(p) ≤ 8.
Proof. The dimension condition of the previous corollary clearly holds if s ≤ 3.
6. Beyond the main result
The quasilinear case of Conjecture 1.1 remains open in the situation where 2s−1 < k <
Corollaries 5.8, 5.9 and 5.10 give some partial results in this direction. In this last
section, we show that one can eliminate infinitely bad values of dim(q) without imposing
any assumption on k. More precisely, we prove the following:
2s .
16
STEPHEN SCULLY
Theorem 6.1. The quasilinear case of Conjecture 1.1 holds if
2N ≤ dim(q) ≤ 2N + 2s+1
for some positive integer N .
The proof is similar to that of Theorem 5.7, but we will now also use the fact that
Conjecture 1.1 is known to be true when dim(q) ≤ 2s . In other words, we will use (the
quasilinear case of) the Separation Theorem ([Hof95],[HL06]). The following lemma is a
trivial extension of the latter result:
Lemma 6.2. Let p and q be anisotropic quasilinear quadratic forms over dimension ≥ 2
over F and let s be the unique non-negative integer such that 2s < dim(p) ≤ 2s+1 . Then
i0 (qF (p) ) ≤ max(0, dim(q) − 2s ).
Proof. Let r = max(0, dim(q) − 2s ) and let ϕ be a codimension r subform of q. To prove
the lemma, it suffices to show that ϕF (p) is anisotropic (see Lemma 3.6 (1) above). But
dim(ϕ) ≤ 2s < dim(p), so this holds by the Separation Theorem ([HL06, Thm. 1.1]).
As a consequence, we have:
Lemma 6.3. The quasilinear case of Conjecture 1.1 holds if dim(q) ≤ 2s+1 + k.
Proof. It suffices to consider the case where dim(q) < 2s+1 − k. In this case, however, we
have
1
(dim(q) − k)
i0 (qF (p) ) =
2
1
>
2dim(q) − 2s+1
2
= dim(q) − 2s ,
so that i0 (qF (p) ) = 0 by Lemma 6.2. Since the statement of the conjecture holds vacuously
in this case, the lemma is proved.
We also need the following fact which follows from standard specialization arguments:
Lemma 6.4. To prove Conjecture 1.1, it suffices to treat the case where dim(p) = 2s + 1.
Proof. Let σ ⊂ p be a subform of dimension 2s + 1. We claim that the substitution p → σ
does not increase the value of k. In other words, we claim that i0 (qF (σ) ) ≥ i0 (qF (p) ). By
[Scu16a, Lem. 3.4], it suffices to show that there exists an F -place from F (p) to F (σ). Let
Xσ and Xp be the projective quadrics defined by σ and p, respectively. The inclusion σ ⊂ p
gives a regular embedding Xσ ֒→ Xp . The quadric Xp is then regular at the generic point
of Xσ . The existence of the desired F -place then follows from [Scu16a, Lem. A.4].
We are now ready to give the proof of Theorem 6.1;
Proof of Theorem 6.1. By Lemmas 6.4 and 6.3, we can assume that
(1) dim(p) = 2s + 1, and
(2) dim(q) > 2s+1 + k.
By (2), we then have that N ≥ s + 1. If dim(q) ≤ 2N + k, there is nothing to prove, so
suppose now that 2N + k < dim(q) ≤ 2N + 2s+1 . By Lemma 3.2 and the definition of k,
we then have that
2s ≤ 2N −1 < i0 (qF (p) ) ≤ 2N −1 + 2s .
QUASILINEAR QUADRATIC FORMS AND FUNCTION FIELDS OF QUADRICS
17
In particular, qF (p) is isotropic. Thus, by Theorem 5.1 and Remark 4.7 (2), we can
assume that there exists an anisotropic form τ over F (p) such that dim(τ ) = i0 (qF (p) ) and
(τ ⊗ p1 )an ⊂ (qF (p))an . Let ϕ = (τ ⊗ p1 )an . As in the proof of Lemma 5.3, we then have
i0 (qF (p) ) ≤ dim(ϕ) ≤ dim(q) − i0 (qF (p) ).
Since i0 (qF (p) ) ≤ 2N −1 + 2s , it follows from Lemma 4.6 that it will be sufficient to show
that dim(ϕ) ≥ 2N −1 +2s . Similar to the arguments of §5, the main point is to observe that
ϕ becomes isotropic to a considerable extent over the function field of τ . More precisely,
let L = F (p)(τ ). As dim(p) = 2s +1, we have dim(p1 ) = 2s . Since dim(τ ) = i0 (qF (p) ) > 2s ,
the Separation Theorem (see Lemma 6.2 above) implies that p1 remains anisotropic over
L. In particular, d (p1 )L = 2s . By Lemma 3.8, we therefore have that
d(ϕL ) ≤ dim(ϕ) − 2s − 2s = dim(ϕ) − 2s+1 .
Rearranging, we get
1
(dim(ϕ) − d(ϕL ))
2
1 s+1
(2 )
≥
2
= 2s .
i0 (ϕL ) =
Now, since dim(q) > 2N + k, we have
dim(τ ) = i0 (qF (p) ) =
1
1
(dim(q) − k) > (2N ) = 2N −1 .
2
2
By Lemma 6.2, it follows that
i0 (ϕL ) ≤ max(0, dim(ϕ) − 2N −1 ).
Since i0 (ϕL ) ≥ 2s , this implies that dim(ϕ) ≥ 2N −1 + 2s , as desired.
Corollary 6.5. The quasilinear case of Conjecture 1.1 is true when dim(q) ≤ 2s+2 + 2s+1 .
Proof. In this range, we can write dim(q) = 2N + a for some non-negative integer N and
some integer a ≤ 2s+1 .
Acknowledgements. The author gratefully acknowledges the support of a PIMS postdoctoral fellowship and NSERC discovery grant during the period in which this research
was carried out.
References
[EKM08] R. Elman, N. Karpenko, and A. Merkurjev. The algebraic and geometric theory
of quadratic forms. AMS Colloquium Publications 56, American Mathematical
Society, 2008.
[Hof95] D.W. Hoffmann. Isotropy of quadratic forms over the function field of a quadric.
Math. Z. 220 (1995), no. 3, 461–476.
, Diagonal forms of degree p in characteristic p, Algebraic and arith[Hof04]
metic theory of quadratic forms, Contemp. Math., 344, Amer. Math. Soc., 2004,
pp. 135–183.
[HL04] D.W. Hoffmann and A. Laghribi. Quadratic forms and Pfister neighbors in
characteristic 2. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 356 (2004), no. 10, 4019–4053.
[HL06] D.W. Hoffmann and A. Laghribi. Isotropy of quadratic forms over the function
field of a quadric in characteristic 2. J. Algebra, 295 (2006), no. 2, 362–386.
18
STEPHEN SCULLY
[Kah08] Bruno Kahn. Formes quadratiques sur un corps. Cours Spécialisés, 15. Société
Mathématique de France, Paris, 2008.
[Kar03] N.A. Karpenko. On the first Witt index of quadratic forms. Invent. Math., 153
(2003), no.2, 455–462.
[Lag04] A. Laghribi. Quasi-hyperbolicity of totally singular quadratic forms. Algebraic
and arithmetic theory of quadratic forms, 237–248, Contemp. Math., 344, Amer.
Math. Soc., 2004.
[Scu16a] S. Scully. On the splitting of quasilinear p-forms. J. Reine Angew. Math., 713
(2016), 49–83.
[Scu16b] S. Scully, Hoffmann’s conjecture for totally singular forms of prime degree, Algebra Number Theory 10 (2016), no. 5, 1091–1132.
[Scu16c] S. Scully. A bound for the index of a quadratic form after scalar extension to
the function field of a quadric. Preprint, 2016, arXiv:1607.07529v1.
[Scu17] S. Scully. Hyperbolicity and near hyperbolicity of quadratic forms over function
fields of quadrics. Preprint, 2017, arXiv:1609.07100v2.
[Tot08] B. Totaro. Birational geometry of quadrics in characteristic 2. J. Algebraic
Geom., 17 (2008), no. 3, 577–597.
Department of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton
AB T6G 2G1, Canada
E-mail address: [email protected]
| 0math.AC
|
Predicting Runtime Distributions using Deep Neural Networks
Katharina Eggensperger and Marius Lindauer and Frank Hutter
arXiv:1709.07615v2 [cs.AI] 24 Oct 2017
University of Freiburg
{eggenspk, lindauer, fh}@cs.uni-freiburg.de
Abstract
Many state-of-the-art algorithms for solving hard combinatorial problems include elements of stochasticity that lead
to high variations in runtime, even for a fixed problem instance, across runs with different pseudo-random number
seeds. Knowledge about the runtime distributions (RTDs) of
algorithms on given problem instances can be exploited in
various meta-algorithmic procedures, such as algorithm selection, portfolios, and randomized restarts. Previous work
has shown that machine learning can be used to individually
predict mean, median and variance of RTDs. To establish a
new state-of-the-art in predicting RTDs, we demonstrate that
the parameters of an RTD should be learned jointly and that
neural networks can do this well by directly optimizing the
likelihood of an RTD given runtime observations. In an empirical study involving four algorithms for SAT solving and AI
planning, we show that our neural networks predict the true
RTDs of unseen instances better than previous methods. As
an exemplary application of RTD predictions, we show that
our RTD models also yield good predictions of running these
algorithms in parallel.
Introduction
Algorithms for solving hard combinatorial problems often
rely on random choices and decisions to improve their performances. For example, randomization helps to escape local optima, enforces stronger exploration and diversifies the search
strategy by not only relying on heuristic information. In particular, most local search algorithms are randomized (Hoos
and Stützle 2004), but structured search (such as tree-based
algorithms) can also benefit from randomization (Gomes et
al. 2000).
The runtimes of randomized algorithms for hard combinatorial problems are well-known to vary substantially, often
by orders of magnitude, even when running the same algorithm multiple times on the same instance (Gomes et al. 2000;
Hoos and Stützle 2004; Hurley and O’Sullivan 2015). Hence,
the central object of interest in the analysis of a randomized
algorithm on an instance is its runtime distribution (RTD), in
contrast to a single scalar for deterministic algorithms. Knowing these RTDs is important in many practical applications,
such as computing optimal restart strategies (Luby, Sinclair,
and Zuckerman 1993), optimal algorithm portfolios (Gomes
and Selman 2001) and the speedups obtained by executing
multiple independent runs of randomized algorithms (Hoos
and Stützle 2004). It is trivial to measure an algorithm’s
empirical RTD on an instance by running it many times to
completion, but for new instances that one would like to
solve, this is of course not practical. Instead, one would like
to estimate the RTD for a new instance without running the
algorithm on it.
There is a rich history in artificial intelligence that shows
that the runtime of algorithms for solving hard combinatorial problems can indeed be predicted to a certain degree (Brewer 1995; Roberts and Howe 2007; Fink 1998;
Leyton-Brown, Nudelman, and Shoham 2009; Hutter et
al. 2014). These runtime predictions have enabled a wide
range of meta-algorithmic procedures, such as algorithm
selection (Xu et al. 2008), model-based algorithm configuration (Hutter, Hoos, and Leyton-Brown 2011), generating
hard benchmarks (Leyton-Brown, Nudelman, and Shoham
2009), gaining insights into instance hardness (Smith-Miles
and Lopes 2012) and algorithm performance (Hutter, Hoos,
and Leyton-Brown 2013), and creating cheap-to-evaluate
surrogate benchmarks (Eggensperger et al. 2017).
Given a method for predicting RTDs of randomized algorithms, all of these applications could be extended by an
additional dimension. Indeed, predictions of RTDs have already enabled dynamic algorithm portfolios (Gagliolo and
Schmidhuber 2006b), adaptive restart strategies (Gagliolo
and Schmidhuber 2006a; Haim and Walsh 2009), and predictions of the runtime of parallelized algorithms (Arbelaez,
Truchet, and O’Sullivan 2016), and many more applications
are possible given effective methods for RTD prediction. To
advance the underlying foundation of all these applications,
in this paper we focus on better methods for predicting RTDs.
Specifically, our contributions are as follows:
1. We propose a principled pipeline to build RTD predictors
for new problem instances based on observed runtimes on
a set of training instances.
2. We compare different ways of predicting RTDs and demonstrate that neural networks (NN) can jointly predict all
parameters of various parametric RTDs, yielding RTD predictions that are superior to those of previous approaches
that predict the RTD’s parameters independently.
3. We propose DistNet, a practical NN for predicting RTDs,
and discuss the bells and whistles that make it work.
4. To illustrate the use of our NN-based RTD predictions in
an application, we demonstrate that they can effectively
predict the performance that can be obtained by running
multiple independent copies of a randomized algorithm in
parallel (Arbelaez, Truchet, and O’Sullivan 2016).
Related Work
The rich history in predicting algorithm runtimes mentioned
in the introduction focuses on predicting mean runtimes,
with only a few exceptions. Hutter et al. (2006) predicted
the single distribution parameter of an exponential RTD and
Arbelaez, Truchet, and O’Sullivan (2016) predicted the two
parameters of log-normal and shifted exponential RTDs with
independent models. In contrast, we jointly predict multiple
RTD parameters (and also show that the resulting predictions
are better than those by independent models).
The work most closely related to ours is by Gagliolo and
Schmidhuber (2005), who proposed to use NNs to learn
a distribution of the time left until an algorithm solves a
problem based on features describing the algorithm’s current
state and the problem to be solved; they used these predictions
to dynamically assign time slots to algorithms. In contrast,
we use NNs to predict RTDs for unseen problem instances.
A final related field of study on predicting distributions
uses non-parametric estimators. Very recently, Eggensperger
et al. (2017) used quantile regression forests (Meinshausen
2006) as a non-parametric model that enables sampling from
predicted runtime distributions. Also very recently, Ambrogioni et al. (2017) showed that NNs can be used as a nonparametric estimator for arbitrary conditional distributions.
In contrast to that, we focus on a parametric approach, using NNs to predict distribution parameters for non-Gaussian
distributed target values.
All existing methods for predicting runtime on unseen instances base their predictions on instance features that numerically characterize problem instances. In particular in the context of algorithm selection, these instance features have been
proposed for many domains of hard-combinatorial problems,
such as propositional satisfiability (Nudelman et al. 2004),
AI planning (Fawcett et al. 2014), mixed integer programming (Xu et al. 2011) and answer set programming (Hoos,
Lindauer, and Schaub 2014). To avoid this manual step of feature construction, Loreggia et al. (2016) proposed to directly
use the text format of an instance as the input to a neural
network to obtain a numerical representation of the instance.
Since this approach performed a bit worse than manually
constructed features, in this work we use traditional features,
but our framework will work with any type of features.
A Pipeline for Predicting RTDs
The problem we address in this work can be formally described as follows:
Problem Statement (Predicting RTDs). Given
• a randomized algorithm A
• a set of instances Πtrain = {π1 , . . . , πn }
• for each instance πj ∈ Πtrain :
– m instance features f (πj ) = [f (πj )1 , . . . , f (πj )m ]
Distribution
Param.
Normal (N)
µ, σ
Lognormal (LOG)
s, σ
Exponential (EXP)
β
PDF
(x−µ)2
Inverse Gaussian (INV) µ, λ
−
√ 1
e 2σ2
2πσ 2
log(x)−log(s) 2
1
−2
1
σ
√
e
σx 2π
x
−β
1
e
β
λ
2πx3
12
e
−λ(x−µ)2
2xµ2
Table 1: Considered RTD families
– runtime observations t(πj ) = ht(πj )1 , . . . , t(πj )kj i obtained by executing A on πj with kj different seeds,
the goal is to learn a model that can predict A’s RTD well
for unseen instances πn+1 with given features f (πn+1 ).
Following the typical approach in the literature (Hutter
et al. 2006; Arbelaez, Truchet, and O’Sullivan 2016), we
address this problem in two steps:
1. Determine a parametric family D of RTDs with parameters
θ that fits well across training instances;
2. Fit a machine learning model that, given a new instance
and its features, predict D’s parameters θ on that instance.
Figure 1 illustrates the pipeline we use for training these
RTD predictors and using them on new instances. In the
following, we first discuss the various RTD families we considered; explain how we measure the goodness of our RTD
fits (i.e., our loss function); and finally discuss different ways
of predicting RTDs, including our new approach of jointly
learning RTD parameters using NNs.
Parametric Families of RTDs
We considered a set of 4 parametric continuous probability
distributions (shown in Table 1 with exemplary instantiations
shown in Figure 2), most of which have been widely studied
to describe the RTDs of combinatorial problem solvers (Frost,
Rish, and Vila 1997; Gagliolo and Schmidhuber 2006a;
Hutter et al. 2006). As a baseline we consider the normal (aka
Gaussian) distribution, due to its widespread use throughout
in the sciences; assumptions of Gaussian observation noise
also underlie many machine learning methods, such as Gaussian processes.
Since the runtimes of hard combinatorial solvers often vary
on an exponential scale (likely due to the N P-hardness of
the problems studied), a much better fit of empirical RTDs is
typically achieved by a lognormal distribution; this distribution is attained if the logarithm of the runtimes is Gaussiandistributed and has been shown to fit empirical RTDs well in
previous work (Frost, Rish, and Vila 1997).
Another popular parametric family from the literature on
RTDs is the exponential distribution, which tends to describe
the RTDs of many well-behaved stochastic local search algorithms well (Hoos and Stützle 2004). It is the unique family
with the property that the probability of finding a solution in
the next time interval (conditional on not having found one
yet) remains constant over time. This distribution, like the lognormal distribution, can therefore model the relatively long
Algorithm A
Run A kj times on
each πj ∈ Πtrain
Training instances
πj ∈ Πtrain
Compute instance
features f (πj ) for
each πj ∈ Πtrain
Data:
hf (πj ), t(πj ){1...kj } i
Estimate RTD
family D
Fit RTD model
m̂ : f (π) 7→ θ
New instance
πn+1
Compute features
f (πn+1 )
Use m̂ to predict
D’s parameters
θ for πn+1
Figure 1: Our pipeline for predicting runtime distributions. Upper part: training; lower part: test.
−logLD (θ | t(π)1 , . . . , t(π)k ) = −
k
X
log pD (t(π)i |θ). (2)
i=1
Since each instance π ∈ Π results in an RTD, we measure the quality of a parametric family of RTDs for a given
instance set by averaging over the negative log-likelihoods
of all instances. To obtain comparable likelihoods across the
instances, we normalize them by multiplying the likelihoods
with the maximal observed runtime of each instance:2
Figure 2: Different RTD families.
tails of typical RTDs of randomized combinatorial problem
solvers quite well.
By empirically studying a variety of alternative parametric
families, we also found that an inverse Gaussian distribution
(INV) tends to fit RTDs very well.1 Like the lognormal and
exponential distribution, this flexible distribution can also
model long tails well. By setting its λ parameter close to
infinity, it can also be made to resemble a normal distribution.
Quantifying the Quality of RTDs
To measure how well a parametric distribution D with parameters θ fits our empirical runtime observations t(π) =
ht(π)1 , . . . , t(π)k i (the empirical RTD), we use the likelihood of parameters θ given all observations t(π), which is
equal to the probability of the observations under distribution
D with parameters θ:
LD (θ | t(π)1 , . . . , t(π)k ) =
k
Y
pD (t(π)i | θ).
(1)
i=1
Consequently, when estimating the parameters of a given
empirical RTD, we use a maximum-likelihood fit. For numerical reasons, as is common in machine learning, we use the
negative log-likelihood as a loss function to be minimized:
1
The name of the inverse Gaussian distribution can be misleading in the sense that it is not the inverse of a Gaussian distribution.
1 X
− log LD (θ | t(π)1 , . . . , t(π)k ) · max t(π)i
(3)
|Π|
i∈{1...k}
π∈Π
!
n
1 X X
log pD (t(π)i |θ) + log max t(π)i (4)
=−
|Π|
i∈{1...n}
i=1
π∈Π
An alternative is to use a goodness of fit statistical test,
such as the Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) test. The KS-statistic
is based on the maximal distance between an empirical distribution and the cumulative distribution function of a reference
distribution. To aggregate the test results across instances,
we count the number of times for which the KS-test rejected
the null-hypothesis that our measured t(π)i are drawn from
a reference RTD.
Predicting RTDs
Having selected a parametric family of distributions, the last
part of our pipeline is to fit an RTD predictor to efficiently obtain RTDs for new instances. Formally, the problem is to find
a predictive model that maps from instance features f (π) to
the parameters θ of the selected RTD family. In the following,
we briefly discuss how traditional regression models have
been used for this problem, and why this optimizes the wrong
loss function. We then show how to obtain better predictions
with neural networks and introduce our practical DistNet for
this task.
2
When this is not done, easy instances are weighted more heavily: if two RTDs “look” the same but differ in scale by a factor
of 10 due to one instance being 10 times harder, the pdf for the
easier instance is 10 times larger (in order to still integrate to 1);
our normalization removes this bias towards fitting easy instances
better.
Input
Layer
Hidden
Layer #1
Hidden
Layer #n
Output
Layer
θ1πi
f (πi )1
...
...
f (πi )m
...
θpπi
Figure 3: Deep neural network used to model RTDs.
Generalizing from Training RTDs
A straightforward approach for predicting parametric RTDs
based on standard regression models is to fit the RTD’s
parameters θ(π) for each training instance π, and to then
train a regression model on data points hf (π), θ(π)iπ∈Πtrain
that directly maps from instance features to RTD parameters. This approach has been used before based on Gaussian
processes (Hutter et al. 2006) and random forests (Arbelaez, Truchet, and O’Sullivan 2016). There are two variants to extend these approaches to the problem of predicting multiple parameters of RTDs governed by p > 1
parameters: (1) fitting p independent regression models,
or (2) fitting a multi-output model with p outputs. Since
random forests have been shown to perform very well
for standard runtime prediction tasks (Hutter et al. 2014;
Hurley and O’Sullivan 2015), we experimented with them
in variant (1), but also in variant (2), using the multi-output
random forest implementation in scikit-learn (Pedregosa et al.
2011) (which learns the mapping jointly by minimizing the
errors across the p output variables). However, we note that
this multi-output variant, although in principle more powerful
than p independent models, does not optimize the loss function from Equation 2 we care about. We also note that both
variants require fitting RTDs on each training instance, making the approach inapplicable if we, e.g., only have access to
one run for each of a million instances. Now, we show how
neural networks can be used to solve both of these problems.
Joint Predictions with Neural Networks
Neural networks have recently been shown to achieve stateof-the-art performance for many supervised machine learning problems as large data sets became available, e.g., in
image classification and segmentation, speech processing
and natural language processing. For a thorough introduction,
we refer the interested reader to Goodfellow, Bengio, and
Courville (2016). Here, we apply NNs to RTD prediction.
Background on Neural Networks. NNs can approximate
arbitrary functions by defining a mapping y = f (x; W )
where W are the weights to be learnt during training to approximate the function. In this work we use a fully-connected
feedforward network, which can be described as an acyclic
graph that connects nonlinear transformations g in a chain,
from layer to layer. For example, a NN with two hidden layers
that predicts y for some input x can be written as:3
y = g out g (2) g (1) xW (1) W (2) W (3) , (5)
with W (j) denoting trainable network weights and g (j) (the
so-called activation function) being a nonlinear transformation applied to the weighted outputs of the j-th layer. The
last activation function, g (out) is special, and in our case is
exp(·) to constrain all outputs to be positive.
NNs are usually trained with stochastic gradient descent
(SGD) methods using backpropagation to effectively obtain
gradients of a task-specific loss function for each weight.
Neural Networks for predicting RTDs. Figure 3 shows
the general architecture of our NNs for the joint prediction of
multiple RTD parameters. We have one input neuron for each
instance feature f (π)j , and we have one output neuron for
each distribution parameter θk . To this end, we assume that
we know the best-fitting distribution family from the previous
step of our pipeline.
In contrast to RFs, we train our networks to directly minimize the negative log-likelihood of the predicted distribution
parameters given our observed runtimes. Formally, for a given
set of observed runtimes t(π)j and instance features f (π)j ,
we minimize the following loss function in an end-to-end
fashion:
J(W ) = −
kj
X X
logLD (θW |f (πj ), t(πj )i )
(6)
πj ∈Πtrain i=1
Here, θW denotes the values of the distribution parameters
obtained in the output layer given an instantiation W of the
NN’s weights. This optimization process, which targets exactly our loss function of interest (Equation 2), allows to
effectively predict all p distribution parameters jointly. Since
predicted combinations are judged directly by their resulting
negative log-likelihood, the optimization process is driven to
find combinations that work well together (rather than penalizing distance from a prescribed ground truth as was the case
with the random variants (1) and (2) above). This end-to-end
optimization process is also more general as it removes the
need of fitting an RTD on each training instance and thereby
enables using an arbitrary set of algorithm performance data
for fitting the model.
DistNet: RTD predictions with NNs in practice. Unfortunately, training an accurate NN in practice can be tricky
and requires manual attention to many details, including the
3
We ignore bias terms for simplicity of exposition.
network architecture, training procedure, and other hyperparameter settings.4 We call the resulting neural network with
the following considerations DistNet.
To preprocess our runtime data hf (πi ), t(πi ){1...k} i, we
performed the following steps:
1. We removed all (close to be) constant features.
2. For each instance feature type, we imputed missing values
(e.g., because of resource limitations during feature computation) by the median of the known instance features.
3. We normalized each feature f (π)j to mean 0 and standard
deviation 1 because the weights of a neural network are
typically initialized by random samples from a normal
distribution with mean 0 and standard deviation 1.
4. We scaled the observed runtimes in a range of [0, 1] by
dividing it by the maximal observed runtime across all
instances. This also helps the neural network training to
converge faster.
For training DistNet, we considered the following aspects:
1. Our first networks tended to overfit the training data if the
training data set was too small and the network too large.
Therefore, we recommend to use a sufficiently large number of instances and runtime observations, and we chose
a fairly small neural network with two hidden layers each
with 16 neurons. We believe that far better performance
could be achieved with larger and deeper networks when
more training instances are available.
2. We considered each runtime observation as an individual
data sample. Hence, we increased the number of training
samples to the number of instances |Π| times the number
of observations k—the training set size for the random
forest equals the number of instances.
3. We shuffled the runtime observations (as opposed to, e.g.,
using only data points from a single instance in each batch)
and use a fairly small batch size to reduce the correlation
of the training data points in each batch.
4. Our loss function can have very large gradients because
slightly suboptimal RTD parameters can lead to likelihoods
close to zero (or a very large negative log-likelihood).
Therefore, we used a fairly small initial learning rate and
used gradient clipping (Pascanu, Mikolov, and Bengio
2013) on top of it with an exponentially decaying learning
rate.
Table 2 shows all architectural choices and hyperparameters
of DistNet.
Experiments
In our experiments, we study the following research questions:
Q1 Which of the parametric RTD families we considered
best describe the empirical RTDs of our algorithms and
instances?
4
Automated machine learning tools, such as AutoNet (Mendoza
et al. 2016), can help with this process, but AutoNet so far does not
support distributions; we aim to contribute this feature to it in the
future.
parameter
value
# hidden layers
# neurons per layer
batch size
activation function
output act. function
2
16
16
tanh
exp
parameter
value
optimization algo.
init. learn. rate
final learn. rate
batch normalization
L2-regularization
gradient clipping
SGD
1e-3
1e-5
True
1e-4
1e-2
Table 2: Configuration of DistNet.
Scenario
Saps-CV-VAR
LPG-Zenotravel
ProbSAT-7SAT
Clasp-K5
#instances
#features
10011
3999
242
550
46
165
94
83
Table 3: Characteristics of the used data sets.
Q2 How do DistNet’s joint predictions of RTD parameters
compare to those of popular random forest models?
Q3 Can DistNet be used to predict the runtime achieved by
multiple-independent-run parallelization?
Experimental Setup
We focus on 4 well-studied algorithms, each evaluated on
a different set of problem instances from two different domains:
Saps-CV-VAR is based on the dynamic local search SAT
solver Saps (Hutter, Tompkins, and Hoos 2002). The SAT
instances are randomly generated with a varying clausevariable ratio (CV-VAR).
LPG-Zenotravel is based on the local search AI-planning
solver LPG (Gerevini and Serina 2002). The instances are
from the zenotravel planning domain (Penberthy and Weld
1994), which arise in a version of route planning.
ProbSAT-7SAT is based on the local search SAT solver
ProbSAT (Balint and Schöning 2012). We ran this on 7SAT
random instances.
Clasp-K5 is based on the tree-based CDCL solver
Clasp (Gebser, Kaufmann, and Schaub 2012). In our experiments, Clasp is randomized by using a randomly-selected
split variable with a probability of 5%. The instances are
randomly generated unsatisfiable SAT instances.
The sizes of our instance sets are shown in Table 3. To gather
training data, we ran each algorithm with 100 different seeds
on each instance. All runs were performed on a compute
cluster with nodes equipped with two Intel Xeon E5-2630v4
and 128GB memory running CentOS 7. We used the opensource neural network library keras (Chollet and others 2015)
for our neural networks, scikit-learn (Pedregosa et al. 2011)
for the RF implementation and scipy (Jones et al. 2001) for
fitting the distributions.
Q1: Best RTD Families
Figure 4 shows some exemplary CDFs of our empirical
RTDs; each line is the RTD on one of the instances. The
Saps-CV-VAR
LPG-Zenotravel
ProbSAT-7SAT
Clasp-K5
Figure 4: Empirical CDFs observed when running the default configuration of an algorithms 100 times. Blue indicates satisfiable
instances, red indicates unsatisfiable instances.
−logLD (θ | t(π))
LOG
-0.88
LOG
LPG-Zenotravel
-0.90
EXP
ProbSAT-7SAT
-0.58
INV
Clasp-K5
-1.36
Saps-CV-VAR
INV
-0.88
INV
-0.90
LOG
-0.50
LOG
-1.36
N
-0.75
N
-0.62
N
-0.20
N
-1.36
EXP
0.26
EXP
-0.08
INV
-0.19
EXP
0.81
KS: (%p) ≤ 0.01
LOG
0.1
LOG
12.7
EXP
0.0
INV
0.0
INV
4.0
INV
20.2
LOG
0.8
LOG
0.0
N
20.1
N
79.2
N
59.1
N
0.0
EXP
87.5
EXP
100.0
INV
93.4
EXP
100.0
Table 4: Results for fitted distributions: average negative
log-likelihood across instances and percentage of rejected
distributions according to a KS-test (α = 0.1 without multiple testing correction). For each scenario, we report result for
the top-3 distributions ranked by the negative log-likelihood.
For both metrics, smaller numbers are better.
Scenario
dist
LOG
Saps-CV-VAR
INV
LOG
LPG-Zenotravel
INV
EXP
ProbSAT-7SAT
LOG
INV
Clasp-K5
LOG
different algorithms’ RTDs show different characteristics. On
Saps-CV-VAR, most RTDs are very similar and have short
right tails. On LPG-Zenotravel, the RTDs have a long right
tail and a short left tail. In contrast, the RTDs of ProbSAT7SAT have a very long right tail and no left tail. On Clasp-K5,
the RTDs are nearly symmetric.
Table 4 shows a quantitative evaluation of the different
RTD families we considered (see Section Quantifying the
Quality of RTDs). Overall, our fitted distributions closely
resembled the true empirical RTDs, with a rejection rate of
the KS test for the best fitting distribution of at most 12.7%.
Hence, on most instances our best distributions were not
statistically significantly different from the observed ones.
Not surprisingly, different parametric RTD families performed best on each scenario, with LOG and INV showing
overall good performance, followed by N. EXP performed
worst in 3 out of 4 cases, but best for ProbSAT-7SAT. On
LPG-Zenotravel the KS-test showed the most statistically
significant differences for the best fitting distribution since
the CDFs start with a small shift (see Figure 4) and therefore
cannot be approximated perfectly by our distributions. Still,
these distributions achieved good negative log-likelihood values. On Clasp-K5 all distributions except EXP achieved good
results.
Q2: Predicting RTDs
Next, we turn to the empirical evaluation of our models,
comparing the predictive negative log-likelihood obtained
by DistNet, a multi-output random forest (RF) and fitting
fitted
RF
iRFs DistNet
train
test
train
test
-0.88 0.84 -0.69
-0.88 1.05 -0.30
-0.88 -0.58 -0.36
-0.88 -0.07 0.04
-0.59
-0.59
-0.53
-0.52
train
test
train
test
-0.90
-0.90
-0.90
-0.90
-0.88
-0.85
-0.87
-0.79
-0.89
-0.84
-0.83
-0.77
-0.85
-0.85
-0.84
-0.84
train
test
train
test
-0.58
-0.58
-0.50
-0.50
-0.53
-0.46
-0.47
-0.39
-0.55
-0.45
-0.45
-0.39
-0.57
-0.41
-0.48
-0.33
train
test
train
test
-1.36
-1.36
-1.36
-1.36
-0.98
-0.71
-1.32
-1.15
-1.24
-1.00
-1.28
-1.15
-1.34
-1.17
-1.34
-1.18
Table 5: Averaged negative log-likelihood achieved for predicting RTDs for unseen instances. We report the average
across a 10-fold cross-validation with the first line for each
dataset being the performance on the training data and the
second line being the performance on the test data. For each
scenario, we picked the two best-fitting RTD families (according to negative log-likelihood; see Table 4) and highlight
the best predictions.
multiple independent RFs, one for each distribution parameter (iRFs). For DistNet, we used the settings as described
in Table 2 and limit the training to take at most 1h or 1000
epochs, whichever was less. As a gold standard, we report the
negative log-likelihood obtained by a maximum likelihood
fit to the empirical RTD.
Table 5 shows the negative log-likelihood achieved using
a 10-fold cross-validation, i.e., we split the instances into
ten disjoint sets, train our models on all but one subset and
measure the test performance on the left out subset. We report
the average performance on train and test data across all splits
for the two best fitting distributions according to Table 4.
Overall our results show that it is possible to predict RTD
parameters for unseen instances, and that DistNet performed
best. For three out of four scenarios, our models achieved a
negative log-likelihood close to the gold standard of fitting
the RTDs to the observed data. Also, for most scenarios both
distribution families were similarly easy to predict for all
ProbSAT-7SAT
Clasp-K5
LPG-Zenotravel
Saps-CV-VAR
Figure 5: Estimated runtime for running algorithms in parallel. We compare the true runtime based on collected data to
the estimated runtime obtained with fitted distributions and
based on DistNet.
models. For the RF-based model, we observed slight overfitting for Saps-CV-VAR, LPG-Zenotravel, and Clasp-K5. For
DistNet, we only observed this on the smallest data sets,
ProbSAT-7SAT and Clasp-K5.
On Saps-CV-VAR, the multi-output RF yielded very poor
predictions for the LOG distribution; we believe this is due
to the fact that the ranges of its two distribution parameters
obtained by fitting the distributions vary greatly. This affects
the loss function the RF uses to fit the data (i.e., the sum of the
losses for all parameters). This does not happen when fitting
two RFs individually (as can be seen by the better negative
log-likelihood values obtained by iRFs), but it underlines the
importance of optimizing the right loss function as we do in
DistNet.
On ProbSAT-7SAT, the models basically only needed to
fit a single parameter: EXP only has a single parameter (β),
and although LOG has two parameters (µ and σ), only µ was
important for ProbSAT-7SAT since σ was almost constant.
Thus, in this case, the difference between RF and iRFs was
due to noise and DistNet could not profit from its joint model.
Overall, DistNet clearly yielded the most robust results. It
achieved the best test set predictions in 6/8 cases, sometimes
with substantial improvements over the RF baselines, and
only performed slightly worse for the smallest ProbSAT7SAT benchmark (for which also only one RTD parameter
was relevant).
Q3: DistNet for Parallel RTD prediction
Finally, we evaluate DistNet on a typical application: predicting the estimated runtime of a simple parallelization scheme.
In this setting, an algorithm is trivially parallelized by running
multiple independent copies with different random seeds in
parallel. Because of the randomization, one of the runs will
solve the instance faster than the others, at which point all
other runs can be terminated. Knowing in advance how many
parallel ressources are required to reach a certain speed-up allows for efficient trade-offs between computational resources
and the time needed to solve an instance.
Here, we approximate the runtime of n parallel runs by
drawing n samples from the sequential algorithm’s RTD 1000
times, and obtain the expected parallel runtime by taking the
average of the best out of n samples across all simulated
parallel runs.
We simulate running n = 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32 copies of the
same algorithm in parallel and compare the expected parallel runtime based on our empirical RTDs and based on the
predicted RTDs of DistNet. To aggregate the results, we used
the average estimated runtime across all problem instances
(by concatenating the results on all 10 test folds).
Figure 5 shows the expected runtime depending on the
number of parallel runs. For ProbSAT-7SAT and Clasp-K5,
we obtained estimated runtimes close to the true distribution. For LPG-Zenotravel, the KS-test already indicated that
LOG is not a perfectly-fitting distribution, and hence the
estimated runtimes of parallel algorithm runs obtained by
fitting distributions do not line up with the true parallel runtimes. Nevertheless, our DistNet perfectly matched the gold
standard of the fitted distribution. Finally, on Saps-CV-VAR,
DistNet overestimated the left tail of the RTD slightly, causing it to also underestimate the runtime of a parallel portfolio.
Nevertheless, the overall trend was predicted correctly. Overall, from these experiments, we conclude that the predictions
obtained with DistNet are suitable to estimate the runtime of
parallel algorithm runs.
Conclusion and Future Work
In this paper we showed that neural networks can be used
to jointly learn distribution parameters to predict runtime
distributions (RTDs). In contrast to previous random forest
models, we train our model on individual runtime observations, removing the need to fit RTDs on all training instances.
More importantly, our neural network – which we dub DistNet – directly optimizes the loss function of interest in an
end-to-end fashion, and by doing so obtains better predictive
performance than previously-used random forests models
that do not directly optimize this loss function.
One way to extend our work and increase the amount of
available training data would be to also consider censored
observations in the loss function of our neural network as proposed by Gagliolo and Schmidhuber (2006a). Furthermore,
so far, we only studied problems with either only satisfiable
or only unsatisfiable instances. In practice, we may face instances of both types, and each may follow a different RTD
family. We expect that using a mixture of models (Jacobs et al.
1991) to learn different distribution families could alleviate
this problem.
While in this paper we only briefly illustrated the suitability
of RTD predictions on one simple application, we note that
our methodology allows for better RTD predictions in general
and therefore may pave the way for improving many exciting
applications that currently rely on mean predictions only,
such as, e.g., algorithm selection (Xu et al. 2008) and modelbased algorithm configuration (Hutter, Hoos, and LeytonBrown 2011).
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge funding by the DFG (German Research Foundation) under Emmy Noether grant HU 1900/2-1.
K. Eggensperger additionally acknowledges funding by the
State Graduate Funding Program of Baden-Württemberg.
Furthermore, the authors acknowledge support by the state of
Baden-Württemberg through bwHPC and the DFG through
grant no INST 39/963-1 FUGG.
References
[Ambrogioni et al. 2017] Ambrogioni, L.; Güçlü, U.; van Gerven,
M.; and Maris, E. 2017. The kernel mixture network: A nonparametric method for conditional density estimation of continuous random
variables. arXiv [stat.ml] 1705.07111.
[Arbelaez, Truchet, and O’Sullivan 2016] Arbelaez, A.; Truchet, C.;
and O’Sullivan, B. 2016. Learning sequential and parallel runtime
distributions for randomized algorithms. In Proc. of ICTAI’16.
[Balint and Schöning 2012] Balint, A., and Schöning, U. 2012.
Choosing probability distributions for stochastic local search and
the role of make versus break. In Proc. of SAT’12, 16–29.
[Brewer 1995] Brewer, E. A. 1995. High-level optimization via
automated statistical modeling. In ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 80–91.
[Chollet and others 2015] Chollet, F., et al. 2015. Keras. https:
//github.com/fchollet/keras.
[Eggensperger et al. 2017] Eggensperger, K.; Lindauer, M.; Hoos,
H.; Hutter, F.; and Leyton-Brown, K. 2017. Efficient benchmarking
of algorithm configuration procedures via model-based surrogates.
arXiv [cs.AI] 1703.10342v1:1–27.
[Fawcett et al. 2014] Fawcett, C.; Vallati, M.; Hutter, F.; Hoffmann,
J.; Hoos, H.; and Leyton-Brown, K. 2014. Improved features for
runtime prediction of domain-independent planners. In Proc. of
ICAPS’14. AAAI.
[Fink 1998] Fink, E. 1998. How to solve it automatically: Selection
among problem-solving methods. In Proc. of ICANN’08, 128–136.
AAAI Press.
[Frost, Rish, and Vila 1997] Frost, D.; Rish, I.; and Vila, L. 1997.
Summarizing CSP hardness with continuous probability distributions. In Proc. of AAAI’97, 327–333.
[Gagliolo and Schmidhuber 2005] Gagliolo, M., and Schmidhuber,
J. 2005. A neural network model for inter-problem adaptive online
time allocation. In Proc. of ICANN’05, 752–752.
[Gagliolo and Schmidhuber 2006a] Gagliolo, M., and Schmidhuber,
J. 2006a. Impact of censored sampling on the performance of restart
strategies. In Proc. of CP’06, volume 4204, 167–181.
[Gagliolo and Schmidhuber 2006b] Gagliolo, M., and Schmidhuber,
J. 2006b. Learning dynamic algorithm portfolios. AMAI 47(34):295–328.
[Gebser, Kaufmann, and Schaub 2012] Gebser, M.; Kaufmann, B.;
and Schaub, T. 2012. Conflict-driven answer set solving: From
theory to practice. AI 187-188:52–89.
[Gerevini and Serina 2002] Gerevini, A., and Serina, I. 2002. LPG:
A planner based on local search for planning graphs with action
costs. In Proc. of AIPS’02, 13–22.
[Gomes and Selman 2001] Gomes, C., and Selman, B. 2001. Algorithm portfolios. AIJ 126(1-2):43–62.
[Gomes et al. 2000] Gomes, C.; Selman, B.; Crato, N.; and Kautz,
H. 2000. Heavy-tailed phenomena in satisfiability and constraint
satisfaction problems. Journal of Automated Reasoning 24:67–100.
[Goodfellow, Bengio, and Courville 2016] Goodfellow, I.; Bengio,
Y.; and Courville, A. 2016. Deep Learning. MIT Press.
[Haim and Walsh 2009] Haim, S., and Walsh, T. 2009. Restart
strategy selection using machine learning techniques. In Proc. of
SAT’09.
[Hoos and Stützle 2004] Hoos, H., and Stützle, T. 2004. Stochastic
Local Search: Foundations & Applications. Morgan Kaufmann
Publishers Inc.
[Hoos, Lindauer, and Schaub 2014] Hoos, H.; Lindauer, M.; and
Schaub, T. 2014. claspfolio 2: Advances in algorithm selection for
answer set programming. TPLP 14:569–585.
[Hurley and O’Sullivan 2015] Hurley, B., and O’Sullivan, B. 2015.
Statistical regimes and runtime prediction. In Proc. of IJCAI’15,
318–324.
[Hutter et al. 2006] Hutter, F.; Hamadi, Y.; Hoos, H. H.; and LeytonBrown, K. 2006. Performance prediction and automated tuning of
randomized and parametric algorithms. In Proc. of CP’06, 213–228.
[Hutter et al. 2014] Hutter, F.; Xu, L.; Hoos, H.; and Leyton-Brown,
K. 2014. Algorithm runtime prediction: Methods and evaluation.
AIJ 206:79–111.
[Hutter, Hoos, and Leyton-Brown 2011] Hutter, F.; Hoos, H.; and
Leyton-Brown, K. 2011. Sequential model-based optimization for
general algorithm configuration. In Proc. of LION’11, 507–523.
[Hutter, Hoos, and Leyton-Brown 2013] Hutter, F.; Hoos, H.; and
Leyton-Brown, K. 2013. Identifying key algorithm parameters
and instance features using forward selection. In Proc. of LION’13.
364–381.
[Hutter, Tompkins, and Hoos 2002] Hutter, F.; Tompkins, D.; and
Hoos, H. 2002. Scaling and probabilistic smoothing: Efficient
dynamic local search for SAT. In Proc.of CP’02, 233–248.
[Jacobs et al. 1991] Jacobs, R.; Jordan, M.; Nowlan, S.; and Hinton,
G. 1991. Adaptive mixtures of local experts. Neural Computation
3(1):79–87.
[Jones et al. 2001] Jones, E.; Oliphant, T.; Peterson, P.; et al. 2001.
SciPy: Open source scientific tools for Python. http://www.
scipy.org/.
[Leyton-Brown, Nudelman, and Shoham 2009] Leyton-Brown, K.;
Nudelman, E.; and Shoham, Y. 2009. Empirical hardness models:
Methodology and a case study on combinatorial auctions. Journal
of ACM 56(4).
[Loreggia et al. 2016] Loreggia, A.; Malitsky, Y.; Samulowitz, H.;
and Saraswat, V. 2016. Deep learning for algorithm portfolios. In
Proc. of AAAI’16, 1280–1286.
[Luby, Sinclair, and Zuckerman 1993] Luby, M.; Sinclair, A.; and
Zuckerman, D. 1993. Optimal speedup of las vegas algorithms. Inf.
Process. Lett. 47(4):173–180.
[Meinshausen 2006] Meinshausen, N. 2006. Quantile regression
forests. JMLR 7:983–999.
[Mendoza et al. 2016] Mendoza, H.; Klein, A.; Feurer, M.; Springenberg, J.; and Hutter, F. 2016. Towards automatically-tuned
neural networks. In ICML 2016 AutoML Workshop.
[Nudelman et al. 2004] Nudelman, E.; Leyton-Brown, K.; Devkar,
A.; Shoham, Y.; and Hoos, H. 2004. Understanding random SAT:
Beyond the clauses-to-variables ratio. In Proc. of CP’04, 438–452.
[Pascanu, Mikolov, and Bengio 2013] Pascanu, R.; Mikolov, T.; and
Bengio, Y. 2013. On the difficulty of training recurrent neural
networks. In Proc. of ICML’13, 1310–1318.
[Pedregosa et al. 2011] Pedregosa, F.; Varoquaux, G.; Gramfort, A.;
Michel, V.; Thirion, B.; Grisel, O.; Blondel, M.; Prettenhofer, P.;
Weiss, R.; Dubourg, V.; Vanderplas, J.; Passos, A.; Cournapeau, D.;
Brucher, M.; Perrot, M.; and Duchesnay, E. 2011. Scikit-learn:
Machine learning in Python. JMLR 12:2825–2830.
[Penberthy and Weld 1994] Penberthy, J., and Weld, D. 1994. Temporal planning with continuous change. In Proc. of AAAI’94, 1010–
1015.
[Roberts and Howe 2007] Roberts, M., and Howe, A. 2007. Learned
models of performance for many planners. In ICAPS 2007 Workshop
AI Planning and Learning.
[Smith-Miles and Lopes 2012] Smith-Miles, K., and Lopes, L. 2012.
Measuring instance difficulty for combinatorial optimization problems. Computers and Operations Research 39(5):875–889.
[Xu et al. 2008] Xu, L.; Hutter, F.; Hoos, H.; and Leyton-Brown, K.
2008. SATzilla: Portfolio-based algorithm selection for SAT. JAIR
32:565–606.
[Xu et al. 2011] Xu, L.; Hutter, F.; Hoos, H.; and Leyton-Brown, K.
2011. Hydra-MIP: Automated algorithm configuration and selection
for mixed integer programming. In Proc. of RCRA workshop at
IJCAI.
| 2cs.AI
|
Enabling Bio-Plausible Multi-level STDP using
CMOS Neurons with Dendrites and Bistable RRAMs
Xinyu Wu
Vishal Saxena
Boise, ID, USA
[email protected]
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
University of Idaho
Moscow, ID, USA
[email protected]
Stochastic
I. INTRODUCTION
Human brain is capable of processing unstructured
information sensed from the environment, and performing realtime pattern discovering and recognition tasks in a remarkably
fast, accurate, robust, and energy-efficient manner. Thanks to a
half century of advances in semiconductor technology, modern
computers can perform such tasks but still require orders of
magnitude higher energy, as well as specialized programming.
Massive parallelism, event-driven spike-based communication
and in-situ synaptic plasticity are believed to be responsible for
brain’s effective and energy-efficient information processing.
Recently, brain-inspired neuromorphic hardware have
demonstrated impressive ultra-low power performance in
implementing convolutional neural networks [1]. However, it
is not amenable to accommodate a huge number of synapses
and cannot adjust the synaptic weights while in operation. In
the past decade, the discovery of spike-timing-dependentplasticity (STDP) and emerging of nanoscale resistive randomaccess memory (RRAM) devices has opened new avenues
towards the realization of brain-inspired computing. Many
RRAMs have demonstrated small feature size (4F2), ultraenergy-efficiency (pJ/switch), CMOS compatible and 3D
integration capability, and exhibit bio-plausible STDP
characteristics [2], [3]. Studies also suggested STDP can be
used to train spiking neural networks (SNNs) with RRAM
synapses in-situ without trading-off their parallelism [4], [5].
A densely-integrated CMOS-RRAM spiking neural
network, with non-volatile analog-like weights, is ideal for
such realization [4], [7]. However, neuromorphic circuit
community is facing challenges in practical realization of these
implementations, where a major roadblock is the bistable and
probabilistic switching behavior of RRAM [9]–[12]. A
majority of small-size RRAMs exhibits abrupt switching
nature, which in consequence limits stable synaptic resolution
to 1-bit (or binary, bistable); furthermore, their switching
probability and switching time are typically depends on the
voltage applied to the device, as well as the duration of the
voltage pulse. Fig. 1 illustrated the abrupt resistance decrease
(SET) and the corresponding switching dependence on the
voltage in a HfOx RRAM device [13]. To circumvent these
issues, compound memristive synapse with multiple bistable
devices in parallel was recently proposed to emulate analog
weights [12]–[14]. Moreover, a standard pattern classification
application has shown that least 4-bit of synaptic resolution is
needed to achieve reasonable recognition performance [15].
However, simply placing multiple bistable RRAM in parallel
doesn’t result in the expected exponentially shaped learning
A
B
1M
100k
Probability Density (%)
Keywords—Neuromorphic; Resistive Memory;
Computing; Spike-Timing Dependent Plasticity
Consequently, it is natural to envision hybrid CMOS-RRAM
very-large-scale integrated (VLSI) circuits to achieve dense
integration of CMOS neurons and RRAM synapses to build
neural-inspired computing chips by leveraging the nanometer
scale silicon processing technology. Recently, mixed-signal
chips with spiking neurons that can interface with RRAM
devices, and learning algorithms and circuits built using these
neural motifs have been demonstrated by the authors [6]–[8].
Resistance (Ω)
Abstract— Large-scale integration of emerging nanoscale
non-volatile memory devices, e.g. resistive random-access
memory (RRAM), can enable a new generation of neuromorphic
computers that can solve a wide range of machine learning
problems.
Such
hybrid
CMOS-RRAM
neuromorphic
architectures will result in several orders of magnitude reduction
in energy consumption at a very small form factor, and herald
autonomous learning machines capable of self-adapting to their
environment. However, the progress in this area has been
impeded from the realization that the actual memory devices fall
well short of their expected behavior. In this work, we discuss the
challenges associated with these memory devices and their use in
neuromorphic computing circuits, and propose pathways to
overcome these limitations by introducing ‘dendritic learning’.
Abrupt
SET
10k
1k
25
20
Measured from
One device for 100 cycles
15
10
5
Repetitive Pulse +1.7V / 10ns
100
0
5
10
Pulse Number
15
20
0
1.0 1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
2.4
2 .6
SET Pulse Threshold (V)
Fig.1. Binary stochastic switching and the STDP in RRAM. (A) Abrupt SET
transition starting from the off-state by repetitive SET pulses. (B) Measured
statistical distribution of pulse amplitude required for triggering the SET
switching from the off-state (adapted from [13]).
A
Vpre
B
Vpre
RRAMs
C
Vleaky
Δt < 0
Foreward
spikes
Vpost
Vrefr
Cmem
SW1
t
t
Vnet = Vpost - Vpre
Vnet = Vpost - Vpre
Pre-synaptic
neuron
Vpost
Veff
Vth-
Av
Vth+
Vth+
t
Vth-
t
Vthr
Mleaky
Фd=1
SW2
t
t
Δt > 0
Vpost
Compound
Synapse
Backward
spike
Veff
Spike
Generator
Vrest
Vpd,0
Vpd,1
α1
1
Vpd,2
Фf=0
Фd=0
Vpre
α2
1 SW3
Vcpr
Vmem
Фd
Фi Phase
Ф1 Controller
Ф2
Post-synaptic neurons
Фf Bus
Фc
αn
Dendritic
Processing
Vtch
Vmode
Vrst
Interface
Vwtab
Fig.2. The proposed with CMOS neural network with dendritic processing. (A) A pair of spikes are applied across a synapse to create relative-timing dependent
net potential Vnet, of which the over-threshold portion (Veff ) may cause the RRAM resistance to switch. (B) A single layer of spiking neural network with RRAM
synapses organized in crossbar architecture. Post-synaptic neuron connects with a pre-synaptic neuron with several RRAM synapses in parallel. Back-propagated
spikes after dendritic processing modulate RRAM in-situ under STDP learning rule. (C) Schematic diagram of the proposed CMOS neuron with dendritic
processing architecture. Parallel attenuators (αi) reduce voltage amplitude of backward spikes for parallel RRAM devices when CMOS soma fires. During nonfire (integration) mode, all parallel RRAM devices are connected to same current summing point.
window that appears in biological STDP, which has been
found critical for guaranteeing computing stability and
efficiency in theoretical analyses [16]–[18].
The fundamental contribution of this work is that we
propose a new concept where “dendritic processing” is added
to the compound synapse. This is an important step where
bistable switching devices, which have been practically
realized, be researchers, can be employed in stochastic regime
to realize synapses with multi-bit resolution and lead to
practical realization of large-scale spiking neural networks on
chip. Leveraging the bistable probabilistic switching, we
specifically demonstrate that the proposed compound synapse
with dendritic processing can realize high-resolution plasticity
with the much desired exponentially-shaped STDP learning
window.
are reduced in these branches depending on their attributes.
Since the synaptic devices’ switching depends on the voltage
and duration applied on their two terminals, these postdendritic spike waveforms after dendritic processing produce
several different voltage amplitudes and cause the synaptic
devices to switch with different probabilities (assuming same
pulse duration): the greater of the post-dendritic spike
amplitude, the higher probability to switch; the lower of the
post-dendritic spike amplitude, the less probability to switch.
Thus, from statistical standpoint, the average conductance of
the compound synapse with n binary RRAM devices in parallel
under a given voltage Vi can be written in mathematical
formula as
𝑛
̅̅̅̅
𝐺𝑐𝑠 (𝑉) = ∑ 𝑝𝑖 (𝑉𝑖 )
𝑖=1
II. REALIZING MULTIBIT SYNAPSES USING BISTABLE RRAMS
In pair-wise STDP learning, spikes sent from pre- and postsynaptic have their voltage amplitudes below the positive and
negative switching thresholds (Vth+ and Vth-) of a bipolar
RRAM device. RRAM switching events may occur only if this
spike pair overlaps and creates a net potential (Vnet) greater
than the switch threshold, as illustrated in Fig.2A. When
several bistable RRAM devices are combined in parallel in a
crossbar configuration to realize a compound synapse with
multi-bit resolution, all the RRAMs in parallel will have a
same switching probability as a function of applied voltage, if
they are simply connected between two terminals.
To enable RRAM in the compound synapse with spiketiming-dependent switching probability, dendritic processing is
applied to the pre-synaptic neuron output as shown in Fig. 3B.
Here, a single-layer neural network is implemented in the
crossbar architecture with a RRAM device, as an electrical
synapse, connects pre- and post-synaptic neurons at each
crosspoint. The original spike waveform from the pre-synaptic
neuron runs through multiple dendritic branches before
reaching the binary synaptic devices, and the spike amplitudes
1
𝑅𝑂𝑁,𝑖
𝑛
+ ∑(1 − 𝑝𝑖 (𝑉𝑖 ))
𝑖=1
1
,
𝑅𝑂𝐹𝐹,𝑖
(1)
where pi is the SET switching probability of the ith device, and
RON and ROFF are the RRAM resistance at ON and OFF state
respectively. Generally, ROFF is greater than RON by several
orders of magnitude [19], and thus, can be neglected in overall
conductance. For simplicity, assuming RON of all devices is
same 1 and normalizing it to one, the probability of the
compound synapse equals the normalized conductance value 𝑔
is
𝑛
̅̅̅̅
𝑝(𝐺
𝑐𝑠 (𝑉) = 𝑔) = ∑ 𝑝𝑖 (𝑉𝑖 ).
(2)
𝑖=1
Above formula shows the synergy effect of parallel RRAMs
could approximate a nonlinear function if pi and Vi are not
linear at the same time. So, the proposed dendritic processing
provides a new dimension to manage the amplitude and timing
of spikes, the overall STDP learning curve now can be
designed to a desired shape more easily. This is enabled by the
key fact that the devices are operated in probabilistic switching
regime, and each device switches differently with respect to the
1
RON of a real RRAM could be stochastic as well. See an example in [19].
A
B
C
D
E
F
Fig. 3. STDP learning window created by compound binary resistive synapses with dendritic processing. (A) Pre-synaptic spike waveforms: Dendritic processing
attenuates the voltage amplitude of spike with factors from 0.5 to 1, and creates 16 parallel spikes. (B) Effective potential Veff over parallel devices versus the
relative arrival timing of post- and pre-synaptic spikes. 16 levels are created over Vth+ and Vth-. (C) The compound synapse shows an equivalent of 4-bit (16
levels) weight STDP leaning. Each dot represents a possible resistance value. (D) STDP window with dot density presenting the probability (with noise and
jitter). The double exponential curves fit well to the maximum values of probability. (E) Switching probability for the 16 devices versus the relative pre/post
timing (Δt). The asymmetric shape is created by dendritic processing on the pre-synaptic neuron only. (F) Probability as a function of relative timing of the
compound synapse at each of its conductance state. The state probability curves are spaced with each other in an increasing exponential manner.
time difference between the pre- and post-spikes (Δt)
𝑉𝑖 = 𝑓(∆𝑡).
(3)
In term of circuit realization, each dendritic branch is
implemented by adding an attenuator to the CMOS soma
output in a compact circuitry as shown in Fig. 3B. One of
several possible realizations is a resistor ladder followed by
source follower buffers. In detailed, noting the spike waveform
generated by the spike generator as Va+ and Va-, then the
dendritic processing generates n post- dendritic spikes
+
𝑉𝑝𝑑,𝑖
= 𝛼𝑖 𝑉𝑎+
{ −
,
𝑉𝑝𝑑,𝑖 = 𝛼𝑖 𝑉𝑎−
𝑖 = 1,2, ⋯ , 𝑛
(4)
where Vpd,i+ and Vpd,i- is the positive and negative amplitudes of
the ith post- dendritic spike, and αi is the attenuation factor of
the ith dendritic branch.
The CMOS soma could be implemented in an integrateand-fire circuits and winner-takes-all (WTA) mechanism in a
reconfigurable architecture based on single opamp, as
presented in [6]–[8]. In one configuration, the CMOS soma is
designed to provide a constant voltage at the neuron’s current
summing input, and then, allows reliable and linear spatiotemporal spike integration by charging membrane capacitor
with the flow-in currents converted by passive and resistive
synaptic devices. In another configuration, the CMOS soma
generates STDP- compatible spike and drives the spikes
propagating in both forward and backward directions with high
energy-efficiency. In the third configuration, this soma
circuitry supports local learning with many neurons organized
in a group and becomes selective to the input patterns through
competition and lateral inhibition with a shared WTA bus [7].
III. EXPIRIMENTAL RESULTS
The architecture is implemented and simulated in Python
2.7, and 10,000 epochs were performed for stochastic
simulation.
The stochastic switching of the RRAM synapse is modeled
by the cumulative probability of a Gaussian distribution as
experimentally demonstrated in [13]
𝑝(𝑉𝑛𝑒𝑡 ) = ∫
𝑉𝑛𝑒𝑡
0
1
√2𝜎 2 𝜋
𝑒
−(𝑥−𝑉𝑡ℎ )2
2𝜎 2
𝑑𝑥,
(5)
where p(Vnet) is the SET or RESET switching probability under
net potential Vnet applied across the two terminals of the
RRAM; Vth is the average threshold voltage, and σ is the
A
B
C
E
D
F
E
Fig. 4. STDP learning window created by compound binary resistive synapses without dendritic processing. (A) Pre-synaptic spike waveform. (B) Effective
potential Veff over parallel devices versus the relative arrival timing of post- and pre-synaptic spikes. (C) Equivalent 4-bit STDP leaning window. (D) STDP
window with dot density presenting the probability. The double linear curves fit to the maximum values of probability. (E) Switching probability of the 16
devices versus the Δt. (F) Probability of the compound synapse at each conductance state.
standard deviation of the distribution. Here, for demonstration
purpose we choose Vth+ = 1V and Vth- = -1V for the positive
and negative thresholds respectively, with σ = 0.1.
In simulation, a hardware-friendly spike waveform [4], [7]
is selected. This spike waveform has a constant positive shape
and a linearly rising negative tail, and has been demonstrated
on a CMOS neuron chip by the authors [6]. With a normalized
timescale, the positive tail has 0.9V amplitude and spans 1 time
unit; the negative tail has a peak amplitude of 0.4V and spans 5
time units. Attenuating factors (αi) of the dendritic attenuators
were set to values linearly spanning from 0.6 to 1. Using these
dendrites, 16 parallel spikes were generated as shown in Fig.
3A. These pre-synaptic spikes yield 16 positive and 16
negative levels in the STDP learning function that spans from 5 to 5 time units, as shown in Fig.3B.
Simulation results in Fig.3C shows the STDP learning
windows with normalized conductance changes, 𝑔, where each
dot represents a possible state of the synapse. It clearly
demonstrates an equivalent of 4-bits weight with 16 levels both
on the positive as well as negative sides of the STDP window.
Using each dot to represent the probability density of the state,
Fig.3D depicts the maximum likelihood state of the
conductance change under STDP learning, and now a double
exponential curve fits well to the simulated results. Here, each
dot represents the state of the conductance compound synapse
in the stochastic simulation. Mimicking the biological
measurements, Gaussian noise and jitters were added to the
synaptic change. The STDP learning shows a plateau when Δt
in the range of 0 to 1 because the switching probabilities of the
parallel devices are easier to saturate when only a portion of
the pre-synaptic spike’s tall positive tail overlaps with the postsynaptic spike’s negative tail. Ideally, this plateau can be
eliminated by using a very narrow positive tail for the spike
waveform which corresponds to faster switching characteristics
of the RRAM device.
Fig.3E further illustrates the asymmetry of the STDP
curves, which plot the individual switching probability of the
16 devices versus Δt. We can observe that the RRAMs’
switching probability curves are dense in the left-hand panel,
due to the smaller amplitude of the spike’s negative tail than its
positive tail. Dense probability curves yield narrow span of
their combined distribution, and are easier to saturate
especially when the positive tail of pre-spike partially
overlapping with the post-spike and creates a less change than
full overlapping to the net potential respecting to the Δt. In this
simulation, almost a half of the RRAM devices were saturated
from Δt = 0 to 1. Another view is shown in Fig.3F, which
depicts the probability of the compound synapse to occupy
each of the normalized conductance state. It shows the statewise probability curves are spaced with an increasing
exponential manner; while a significant dominating state of
𝑔 = 16 when Δt falls into the range of 0 to 1.
To provide a comparison of the proposed dendritic
approach with a simple compound synapse, the simulation
results of stochastic STDP learning without dendritic
processing is illustrated in Fig. 4. Although this achieves 4-bit
weight through STDP leaning, however, the STDP learning
curves are linear as shown in Fig. 4D due to the same
switching probability of all the devices in parallel as shown in
Fig. 4E. And the state-wise probability curves are equally
spaced as shown in Fig. 4F.
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
IV. CONCLUSION
The proposed compound synapse with dendritic processing
realizes exponential STDP learning similar to biology, while
using practically feasible bistable memory devices. This can
potentially enable ultra-low-power and significantly compact
machine learning hardware for large-scale spiking neural
networks that require plasticity with multibit resolution.
Immediate applications will include practical realization
ofspike-based convolutional neural networks and restricted
Boltzmann machines in a chip-scale form factor. This
architectural exploration using the proposed compound
probabilistic synapses can help benchmark the expected
behavior from the emerging RRAM devices; nanoscale RRAM
devices with large resistances will help realize lower power
consumption.
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
S. K. Esser et al., “Convolutional Networks for Fast, Energy-Efficient
Neuromorphic Computing,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 2016.
S. Saïghi et al., “Plasticity in memristive devices for spiking neural
networks,” Front. Neurosci., vol. 9, no. MAR, pp. 1–16, 2015.
S. B. Eryilmaz, D. Kuzum, S. Yu, and H. P. S. P. Wong, “Device and
system level design considerations for analog-non-volatile-memory
based neuromorphic architectures,” in Technical Digest - International
Electron Devices Meeting, IEDM, 2015, vol. 2016–Febru, p. 4.1.1-4.1.4.
C. Zamarreño-Ramos, L. A. Camuñas-Mesa, J. A. Pérez-Carrasco, T.
Masquelier, T. Serrano-Gotarredona, and B. Linares-Barranco, “On
spike-timing-dependent-plasticity, memristive devices, and building a
self-learning visual cortex,” Front. Neurosci., vol. 5, no. March, p. 26,
Jan. 2011.
D. Querlioz, W. Zhao, and P. Dollfus, “Bioinspired networks with
nanoscale memristive devices that combine the unsupervised and
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
supervised learning approaches,” in International Symposium on
Nanoscale Architectures (NANOARCH), 2012, pp. 203–210.
X. Wu, V. Saxena, K. Zhu, and S. Balagopal, “A CMOS Spiking
Neuron for Brain-Inspired Neural Networks with Resistive Synapses
and In-Situ Learning,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II Express Briefs, vol.
62, no. 11, pp. 1088–1092, 2015.
X. Wu, V. Saxena, K. Zhu, S. Member, V. Saxena, and K. Zhu,
“Homogeneous Spiking Neuromorphic System for Real-World Pattern
Recognition,” IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Circuits Syst., vol. 5, no. 2, pp.
254–266, 2015.
X. Wu, V. Saxena, and K. Zhu, “A CMOS Spiking Neuron for Dense
Memristor-Synapse Connectivity for Brain-Inspired Computing,” in
International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), 2015.
S. H. Jo, K. H. Kim, and W. Lu, “Programmable resistance switching in
nanoscale two-terminal devices,” Nano Lett., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 496–500,
2009.
R. Soni et al., “On the stochastic nature of resistive switching in Cu
doped Ge 0.3Se0.7 based memory devices,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 110, no.
5, pp. 0–10, 2011.
V. Saxena, “Memory Controlled Circuit System and Apparatus,” US
patent application US 2015/0278682, 2015.
S. Gaba, P. Sheridan, J. Zhou, S. Choi, and W. Lu, “Stochastic
memristive devices for computing and neuromorphic applications,”
Nanoscale, vol. 5, pp. 5872–8, 2013.
S. Yu, B. Gao, Z. Fang, H. Yu, J. Kang, and H.-S. P. Wong, “Stochastic
learning in oxide binary synaptic device for neuromorphic computing,”
Front. Neurosci., vol. 7, no. October, p. 186, 2013.
A. Singha, B. Muralidharan, and B. Rajendran, “Analog memristive
time dependent learning using discrete nanoscale RRAM devices,” in
International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), 2014, pp.
2248–2255.
J. Bill and R. Legenstein, “A compound memristive synapse model for
statistical learning through STDP in spiking neural networks,” Front.
Neurosci., vol. 8, no. December, pp. 1–18, 2014.
H. Sprekeler, C. Michaelis, and L. Wiskott, “Slowness: an objective for
spike-timing-dependent plasticity?,” PLOS Comput. Biol., vol. 3, no. 6,
p. e112, Jun. 2007.
T. Toyoizumi and J. Pfister, “Spike-timing dependent plasticity and
mutual information maximization for a spiking neuron model,” in
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), 2004.
B. Nessler, M. Pfeiffer, L. Buesing, and W. Maass, “Bayesian
computation emerges in generic cortical microcircuits through spiketiming-dependent plasticity,” PLOS Comput. Biol., vol. 9, no. 4, Apr.
2013.
Vishal Saxena, X. Wu, and M. Mitkova, “Addressing Challenges in
Neuromorphic Computing with Memristive Synapses,” in
Neuromorphic Computing Workshop: Architectures, Models, and
Applications, 2016.
| 9cs.NE
|
A micromechanics-enhanced finite element formulation for
modelling heterogeneous materials
Jan Nováka,b,c , Lukasz Kaczmarczyka , Peter Grassla , Jan Zemanb , Chris J. Pearcea,∗
arXiv:1103.5633v2 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci] 15 Jun 2011
a
School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
Faculty of Civil Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Thákurova 7,
166 29 Praha 6, Czech Republic
c
School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of New South Wales, NSW 2052,
Sydney, Australia
b
Abstract
In the analysis of composite materials with heterogeneous microstructures, full resolution of the heterogeneities using classical numerical approaches can be computationally prohibitive. This paper presents a micromechanics-enhanced finite element
formulation that accurately captures the mechanical behaviour of heterogeneous materials in a computationally efficient manner. The strategy exploits analytical solutions derived by Eshelby for ellipsoidal inclusions in order to determine the mechanical perturbation fields as a result of the underlying heterogeneities. Approximation
functions for these perturbation fields are then incorporated into a finite element
formulation to augment those of the macroscopic fields. A significant feature of
this approach is that the finite element mesh does not explicitly resolve the heterogeneities and that no additional degrees of freedom are introduced. In this paper,
hybrid-Trefftz stress finite elements are utilised and performance of the proposed formulation is demonstrated with numerical examples. The method is restricted here
to elastic particulate composites with ellipsoidal inclusions but it has been designed
to be extensible to a wider class of materials comprising arbitrary shaped inclusions.
Keywords: Micromechanics; Equivalent inclusion method; Eshelby’s solution;
Heterogeneous materials; Hybrid-stress finite elements; Displacement perturbations
∗
Corresponding author. Tel.: +44-141-330-5207
Email addresses: [email protected] (Jan Novák),
[email protected] (Lukasz Kaczmarczyk), [email protected]
(Peter Grassl), [email protected] (Jan Zeman), [email protected] (Chris J.
Pearce)
Preprint submitted to Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
June 16, 2011
1. Introduction
In the analysis of materials with complex microstructures, full resolution of
the heterogeneities using classical numerical approaches such as the Finite Element
method can be computationally prohibitive. To overcome this, one option is to model
the macroscale problem using equivalent properties; however, this can lead to a critical loss of information about the finer scale behaviour and poor understanding of the
heterogeneities’ influence on the macroscale response. Numerical approaches such
as computational homogenization (often called FE2 ) provide an alternative strategy [1, 2]. These techniques comprise nested Finite Element analyses, where each
macroscopic material point response is determined via the numerical solution of an
RVE subject to the macroscopic strains. Although such approaches have significant
potential for certain classes of problems, they are still computationally demanding
and are restricted to situations involving clear separation of scales.
The objective of this work is to develop a Finite Element formulation for modelling
the macroscopic mechanical problem that is enhanced to capture the influence of the
underlying heterogeneities. In our approach, the Finite Element mesh is not required
to explicitly resolve the heterogeneities. Closed-form expressions for the perturbation
of the mechanical fields due to the presence of the heterogeneities are determined
and these are then utilised to enhance the Finite Element formulation.
The ability to capture the effect of microstructural features independently of the
underlying finite element mesh has been an ongoing challenge in computational mechanics research. Partition of Unity methods [3, 4, 5, 6] provide a potential solution
to this problem, without mesh refinement, by extending a given solution space with
additional functions and has been successfully applied to problems such as cracks
and material interfaces. The application of this approach in the context of the current work will be briefly discussed in this paper, whereby the closed-form solutions
derived for the mechanical perturbation fields are used to extend the classical finite
element method. However, it will be shown that there are some disadvantages to this
approach for the particular problem at hand and an alternative approach, centred
on the Hybrid-Trefftz stress element formulation [7], represents the main focus of
this paper. This method does not result in additional degrees of freedom, although
it does involve an additional, albeit relatively minor, computational overhead.
The heterogeneities, although currently restricted to simple shapes (ellipsoids),
can be randomly sized and randomly distributed without reference to the finite element mesh. Therefore, the proposed approach has the potential to be applicable to a wide range of composite materials, such as fibre reinforced composites [8],
porous media [9, 10], functionally graded materials [11], etc. Moreover, it can be
2
extended to general inclusion shapes by evaluating the perturbation functions numerically [12, 13].
The paper is structured as follows. The methodology of the proposed strategy is
described in Section 2. Construction of the perturbation approximation functions
for Finite Element Analysis is derived in Section 3. The implementation into the
Hybrid-Trefftz stress element formulation containing an arbitrary number of inclusions is presented in Section 4. Section 5 comprises examples demonstrating the
model’s performance. Finally we present the conclusions as well as a discussion on
future research directions. An appendix is included that highlights some important,
but rather technical, aspects of the proposed technique in order to keep the paper
self-contained.
2. Micromechanics approach
This section outlines the strategy to calculate the perturbation of mechanical
fields due to a heterogeneous microstructure, exploiting the Equivalent Inclusion
Method [14] in conjunction with analytical micromechanics. Our objective is to
convert the heterogeneous problem into an equivalent homogeneous problem and to
derive analytical expressions for the perturbations of the stress, strain and displacement fields that we can then utilise within a finite element formulation.
Consider a body consisting of clearly distinguishable heterogeneities in a matrix
(Fig. 1a) subjected to a displacement u and traction t field. The stiffness of such a
u (x)
, t (x)
Γ
Ω
C1 (x)
6
C (x)
y
Ω4
C (x)
≈
Ω3
Ω
Ω :C
Γ
Ω
C5 (x)
5
C
C0
ε2τ
0
ε4τ
Ω2
Ω4
C0
ε τ3
Ω3
C0
Ω5
6
C0
ε τ5
4
0
x
ε τ1
C3
(x)
Ω
, t (x)
Ω1
Ω2
C2 (x)
1
6
u (x)
C 0 ετ
5
y
0
0
x
(a)
Ω :C
0
(b)
Figure 1: Principle of Equivalent Inclusion Method: a) composite body with inclusions, b) homogeneous reference body with additional equivalent eigenstrains
material is decomposed as follows [14, 13]
C = C0 + V C∗
3
(1)
P
i
0
where C0 is the stiffness tensor of a homogeneous matrix Ω0 and C∗ = N
i [C − C ]
is due to the presence of N inclusions. C∗ is nonzero only within the domain Ω =
Ω1 ∪ · · · ∪ ΩN , so that
0 in Ω0
(2)
V =
1 in Ω
As a result of the heterogeneities, the mechanical fields (displacement, strains, stresses)
experience a perturbation for which we will derive closed-form expressions based on
analytical micromechanics. Symbolically, we can express the decomposition of the
mechanical fields as follows:
u = u0 + u∗ , ε = ε0 + ε∗ , σ = σ 0 + σ ∗
(3)
where, the superscript ·0 indicates the macroscopic component of the fields in the absence of heterogeneities and superscript ·∗ indicates the perturbation (or microscopic)
component due to the presence of the heterogeneities. It is worth noting that, traditionally, in analytical micromechanics, the macroscopic fields are assumed to be
uniform across the domain, e.g. [15, 16]. Here it is assumed that they can be position
dependent functions of the Neumann and Dirichlet boundary conditions.
The perturbation fields are determined by employing the equivalent inclusion
method for a single heterogeneity embedded in a matrix and then extended here
for multiple heterogeneities. In the equivalent inclusion method, the heterogeneous
solid is replaced by an equivalent homogeneous solid with uniform material stiffness
C0 everywhere (Fig. 1a, b) and suitable stress-free eigenstrains ετi applied in the
inclusions Ωi so that the homogeneous equivalent solid has the same mechanical
fields as the original heterogeneous solid.
2.1. Equivalent inclusion method for single heterogeneity problem
Consider first a single heterogeneity embedded in a matrix. Following Eshelby’s
fundamental work [17], this problem can be decomposed into two problems of known
solution and then assembled back via superposition [14, 17], see Fig. 2. In brief,
the solution of the inhomogeneity problem requires the determination of the transformation eigenstrain ετ that induces the identical local mechanical response as the
original heterogeneous body. Due to the absence of other inclusions, no strain or
stress concentrations are induced and thus ετ remains constant [17].
In the original heterogeneous body, the stress state can be expressed as
σ = σ 0 + σ ∗ = C : [ε0 + ε∗ ]
4
(4)
u 0(x) ,q0(x)
(a)
u (x) , t (x)
Γ
x
8
ετ
Ω: C 0
Ω0: C 0
−
8
−
u 0(x) ,q0(x)
everywhere: C 0
−
+
y
8
8
−
8
8
Ω0: C 0
−
≡
x
u (x) , t (x)
Ω: C1 (x)
y
8
8
u (x) , t (x)
−
8
x
u (x) , t (x)
u (x) , t (x)
Γ
y
8
8
8
u (x) , t (x)
u 0(x) ,q0(x)
u (x) , t (x)
u (x) , t (x)
(b)
u 0(x) ,q0(x)
(c)
Figure 2: Equivalent Inclusion Method: a) inhomogeneity problem, b) infinite homogeneous body,
c) homogeneous inclusion problem
In the homogeneous solid, we add a stress-free eigenstrain ετ inside the domain of
the inclusion, which has the same material stiffness C0 as the matrix such that
σ = C0 : [ε0 + ε∗ − ετ ]
(5)
It should be noted that ετ = 0 in the matrix.
Given that the macroscopic stress is σ 0 = C0 : ε0 , it can be see from equating Eqs. (4) and (5), that the stress perturbation in the homogeneous solid can be
expressed as
σ ∗ = C0 : [ε∗ − ετ ]
(6)
Furthermore, equating Eqs. (4) and (5) also results in the following expression:
C : [ε0 + ε∗ ] = C0 : [ε0 + ε∗ − ετ ]
(7)
where the transformation eigenstrain is as yet unknown. Eshelby’s solution of the
homogeneous inclusion problem [17], relates the eigenstrain to the perturbation strain
as follows
ε∗ = S : ετ
(8)
where S denotes the Eshelby tensor and is a function of the heterogeneity’s geometry
and the material stiffness of both the matrix and heterogeneity. Substituting this
expression into Eq. (7) and rearranging yields
C − C 0 : ε0 = C 0 : S − C : S − C 0 : ετ
(9)
This can be recast in a compact form to give an expression for the eigenstrain ετ
which depends on the homogeneous strain ε0 , the material stiffness of both the matrix
and heterogeneity and the Eshelby tensor as
ετ = B : ε0
5
(10)
where the tensor B is provided by:
−1
B = − C∗ : S + C0
: C∗
(11)
Once the transformation eigenstrain has been determined, the stress perturbation
can be computed from Eq. (6) in the form
σ ∗ = C0 : [S − I] : B : ε0
(12)
It can be seen that the stress perturbation depends on stiffness of the different
material phases, the macroscopic strain field and the geometry of the heterogeneity.
This closed-form expression for the stress perturbation is at the heart of the proposed
finite element enrichment to be discussed later in this paper. It is also useful to derive
an expression for the displacement perturbation field as follows
u∗ = L : ετ = L : B : ε0
(13)
where the operator L is a third order tensor, mapping ετ → u∗ . For the sake
of conciseness and to keep the paper self-contained, the detailed derivation of this
operator can be found in Appendix Appendix A.
2.2. Self-compatibility algorithm for multiple inclusions
In the case of multiple inclusions, the mechanical perturbation fields within individual inclusion domains are no longer uniformly distributed as a result of their
mutual interaction. Here, we account for this approximately by assuming that the
eigenfields to be piecewice constant within each inclusion. Thus, the perturbations
are determined from the Eshelby solution for each individual inclusion, as described
above, plus an iterative self-compatibility procedure (Tab. 1) to ensure that the
solution correctly reflects the influence of multiple heterogeneities.
This procedure iteratively enforces compatibility (see eg. [18] for further reference) between the imposed macroscopic strain and the average eigenstrain inside
any given inclusion i, so as to account for the influence of the remaining inclusions
N \i. An iterative algorithm has been chosen because a closed form solution for
multiple inclusions does not exist and a numerical solution would be prohibitively
expensive [18].
First, the eigenstrain ετi for each inclusion i is calculated (Eq. 10) without reference to the other inclusions (Line 2). Next, the associated perturbation strain ε∗i
for each inclusion i is evaluated (Eq. 8) at the centre of all other inclusions (Line
3). The mutual interaction of inclusions is then taken into account via a correction
of the eigenstrain (∆ετi ). For each inclusion i, this correction is calculated (Line 8)
6
from the inverse of the inclusion’s Eshelby tensor S−1
and the perturbation strains
i
of all other inclusions, evaluated at the centroid of inclusion i. The perturbation
strain resulting from inclusion j at the centre of inclusion i is denoted as ε∗i,j . This is
demonstrated in Fig. 3 for a two inclusion problem in 1D. The eigenstrain correction
∆ετi is then used to calculate the correction to the perturbation strains (Line 10).
The algorithm continues until a small Euclidean norm between the last two iterations of the total eigenstrains is achieved. At convergence, the corresponding stress
and displacement perturbations are recalculated from the corrected transformation
eigenstrains.
It is worthwhile noting that the algorithm does not depend on a particular sequence of inclusions, as follows from the elastic reciprocity theorem [18, and references therein]. Moreover, since the perturbation fields are calculated for the entire
macroscopic domain (no RVE is considered), stress admissibility and strain compatibility, in the sense of macro-micro field relations, are fulfilled a priori.
The computational complexity of the Self-compatibility algorithm is O(N 2 ). However, this can be improved by taking into account only those inclusions which have
a non-negligible influence to the inclusion of interest i. Preliminary studies have
shown this to give a significant computational speed-up and will be reported in a
future paper.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Self Compatibility Algorithm (ε0i , Bi , Si , S−1
i , N)
For (i ≤ N )
ετi = Bi : ε0i (Eq. 10)
ε∗i = Si : ετi (Eq. 8)
Set ∆ε∗i = ε∗i
EndFor
Do
For (i ≤ N )
P
−1
∗
(Eq. 8)
∆ετi = N
j\i Si : ∆εi,j
τ
τ
τ
εi = εi + ∆εi
∆ε∗i = Si : ∆ετi
EndFor
PN
∗
While
i k∆εi k > η
Table 1: Self-compatibility algorithm. Note, that η stands for an acceptable tolerance.
7
Figure 3: Principle of self-compatibility algorithm for double inclusion problem in 1D.
3. Construction of perturbation approximation functions for FEA
The above methodology can be utilised to formulate an enhanced Finite Element
formulation. The primary task is to determine appropriate approximation functions
for the mechanical perturbation fields u∗ , ε∗ and σ ∗ based on the analytical micromechanics developed above and which can then augment the standard macroscopic field
approximations. It should be noted that the Voigt-Mandel notation is exclusively
used in the forthcoming text.
The perturbation field approximation functions are determined a priori as a linear
combination of the perturbation fields evaluated analytically for six load cases, with
self-equilibrium enforced by means of the self-compatibility algorithm outlined above
(Tab. 1). Each load case corresponds to a unit component of the macroscopic strain
vector 0i , i = 1, . . . , 6 and the resulting analytically determined stress, strain and
displacement perturbation fields are arranged, column-by-column into s∗6×6 , e∗6×6 and
u∗3×6 matrices, respectively:
s∗ =
1 ∗
σ
...
u∗ =
6 ∗
σ
, e∗ =
1 ∗
u
1 ∗
...
. . . 6 u∗
6 ∗
(14)
(15)
where the left superscript refers to a specific load case, 1 to 6.
3.1. Partition of unity method
Partition of Unity (PU) Methods (for example the eXtended Finite Element
Method) extend the underlying basis functions used for interpolating the displacement field by adding an appropriate set of additional functions. Following [19, 20] it
has been shown that the displacement field u(x) within an element can be interpolated by
n
X
u(x) =
Ni (x)ai + Ni Nγ (x)bi
(16)
i=1
8
where n is the number of nodes per element, Ni (x) = N i (x)I is the standard matrix
of element shape functions for node i, I is the identity matrix and ai the standard
displacement degrees of freedom at node i. Nγ is a matrix containing the additional
basis terms and bi are the associated additional degrees of freedom at node i. It is
important to recognise that the element shape functions form a partition of unity,
i.e.
n
X
N i (x) = 1
(17)
i=1
The six analytically derived displacement perturbation functions contained in u∗ can
be used as the additional functions Nγ to augment the standard basis functions. Thus
1 ∗
u1 (x) . . . 6 u∗1 (x)
0
...
0
0
...
0
1 ∗
(18)
0
...
0
0
...
0
u2 (x) . . . 6 u∗2 (x)
Nγ (x) =
1 ∗
0
...
0
0
...
0
u3 (x) . . . 6 u∗3 (x)
With this at hand, the PU-based finite element formulation can be derived, see for
example [21]. PU methods are particularly useful in problems where the extension of
the basis functions is introduced on a node by node basis, so that additional degrees
of freedom are only introduced at nodes where the basis is extended. One obvious
example of such a local feature that can be modelled in this way is discrete cracks [21].
However, this favourable property is not exploited here because we wish to model a
large number of heterogeneities throughout the domain. In 3D problems, there are
3 standard displacement degrees of freedom per node; this would be extended by an
additional 18 degrees of freedom per node and per heterogeneity with the proposed
approach.
It is also worth noting that for standard finite elements, the volume integration
of the discrete system of equations is relatively straightforward. However, extension
of the basis functions to include the perturbation functions in Eq. (18) makes this
process significantly more arduous. For these reasons, an alternative Finite Element
approach using Hybrid Trefftz Stress elements [22, 7] is considered where the standard
basis function is not extended, as with PU methods, but enhanced such that no
additional degrees of freedom are introduced. This is described in the next section.
4. Hybrid-Trefftz stress element formulation
In this section a finite element formulation based on an enhancement of a hybridTrefftz stress (HTS) element formulation [7] is presented.
9
t (x)
Γe
Γσe
u3
Ωe
z
x
u1
Γue
u(x)
u2
y
x
Figure 4: Elastic body representing HTS element
The problem requires a solution to the displacement u and stress σ fields as a
result of given boundary displacements u and tractions q on Γeu and Γeσ , respectively.
The displacement and stress fields must fulfil the following governing equations:
LT σ
Lu
σ
Nσ
u
=0
=
= C
=t
=u
in Ωe
in Ωe
in Ωe
on Γeσ
on Γeu
. . . Cauchy equilibrium equation
. . . strain-displacement relationship
. . . constitutive equation
. . . static boundary conditions
. . . kinematic boundary conditions
(19)
where σ and are the column matrix representation of the second order stress and
strain tensor, respectively, u represents the displacement vector, C is the matrix
representation of fourth order stiffness tensor and finally u and t represent the applied
displacements and tractions, respectively. The gradient operator L and the matrix
of directional cosines N of the outward normal to element boundary Γe have the
following forms [23]
∂/∂x
0
0
0
∂/∂y
0
n
0
0
0
n
n
x
z
y
0
0
∂/∂z
, N = 0 ny 0 nz 0 nx
L=
(20)
∂/∂y ∂/∂x
0
0 0 nz ny nx 0
0
∂/∂z ∂/∂y
∂/∂z
0
∂/∂x
4.1. Stress, strain and displacement approximations
The macroscopic stress field within the HTS element is approximated as
σ 0 = S0v v in Ωe
10
(21)
where v is the vector of generalised stress degrees of freedom, S0v denotes the matrix of
stress approximation functions chosen so as to automatically satisfy the equilibrium
conditions Eq. (19)1,4 . Thus,
LT S0v v = 0 in Ωe
(22)
and
t = NS0v v on Γe
(23)
where t represents the traction vector induced by the macroscopic stress approximation field.
The macroscopic strain and displacement fields are expressed analogously to
Eq. (21) as
(24)
0 = E0v v and u0 = U0v v
where E0v and U0v are directly associated with the stress approximation by means of
the compatibility equation (19)2 and constitutive equation (19)3 as
S0v = C0 E0v = C0 LU0v
(25)
Since the stress approximation functions S0v are typically polynomial functions, the
integration of E0v to get U0v is relatively straightforward.
Rather than extend the solution space to capture the influence of the heterogeneities, as was briefly described in Section 3.1, here we enhance the macroscopic
approximations to include the influence of the heterogeneities, thereby not increasing the number of unknowns. The total stress (macroscopic plus perturbation) field
within the HTS element is approximated, following Eq. (3), as
σ = σ 0 + σ ∗ = S0v + S∗v v in Ωe
(26)
where S∗v is the perturbation counterpart to S0v . S∗v can be constructed from Eq. (14):
σ ∗ = s∗ 0
(27)
where s∗ is the set of analytically defined stress perturbations for six load cases,
each one representing a unit component of the macroscopic strain Eq. (14). For
the purposes of constructing S∗v , we approximate the macroscopic strain field as
constant within each finite element and computed as the volume average of the
actual macroscopic strain field. From Eq. (24),
Z
Z
1
1
0,ave
0
e
= e
dΩ = e
Ev dΩe v = Eave
(28)
v v
|Ω | Ωe
|Ω | Ωe
11
Substituting 0,ave for 0 into Eq. (27) leads to
σ ∗ = s∗ Eave
v v
(29)
Thus, the matrix of stress perturbation approximation functions is:
S∗v = s∗ Eave
v
(30)
Analogously, the approximation of total strain and displacement fields within the
element domain is given by
(31)
= E0v + E∗v v and u = U0v + U∗v v
where the perturbation approximation matrices U∗v and E∗v are, as with their macroscopic counterparts, directly associated with the stress approximation as
S∗v = C0 E∗v = C0 LU∗v
(32)
It is worthwhile noting that the stress perturbation fields and the corresponding
traction perturbation fields, approximated as σ ∗ = S∗v v and t∗ = NS∗v v, remain in
self-equilibrium.
4.2. Static boundary conditions
Contrary to general condition in Eq. (19)4 , the equilibrium on the element traction
boundary is imposed only in the weighted residual sense as:
Z
W1T N σ 0 + σ ∗ − t dΓe = 0
(33)
Γeσ
along with W1 representing the matrix of weighting functions. Replacing the total
stress field in Eq. (33) by its approximation from Eq. (26), the traction boundary
condition becomes
Z
Z
T
0
∗
e
W1 N Sv + Sv v dΓ =
W1T t dΓe
(34)
Γeσ
Γeσ
4.3. Kinematic boundary conditions
Compatibility inside the element domain Ωe is also enforced in a weighted residual
sense, such that:
Z
W2T 0 + ∗ − Lu dΩe = 0
(35)
Ωe
12
Next, utilising integration by parts and applying Green’s theorem to W2T Lu, Eq. (35)
results in
Z
Z
e
∗
0
T
(LT W2 )T u dΩe
W2 Ev + Ev v dΩ +
e
e
Ω
Z
ZΩ
T
e
(NW2 ) u dΓ =
(NW2 )T u dΓe
−
(36)
Γeσ
Γeu
With the current formulation, it is not necessarily possible to find a solution to both
Eqs. (34) & (36) that satisfies both traction and kinematic boundary conditions acting on the element boundary. As a consequence, Eq. (36) is relaxed by introducing an
additional and independent approximation of displacements on the element traction
boundary:
uΓ = UΓ q in Γeσ
(37)
Here, q stands for the set of displacement unknowns and UΓ is the matrix of boundary
displacement approximation functions. Such a formulation of the stress element leads
to a hybrid approach [7, 22].
Given the above consideration, introducing Eq. (37) into Eq. (36) results in
Z
Z
T
0
∗
e
W2 Ev + Ev v dΩ +
(LT W2 )T u dΩe
e
Ωe
Z
ZΩ
T
e
(NW2 )T u dΓe
(NW2 ) uΓ dΓ =
−
(38)
Γeu
Γeσ
4.4. Weighting functions
In order to achieve an energy-consistent formulation, it is required that all weighted
terms within the integrals defined above have the dimension of work. The weighting
functions then directly follow from the integrands in Eq. (33) and Eq. (35) representing the increment of internal work of strains within Ωe and external work of tractions
on Γeσ , respectively. These functions thus admit the following forms:
W2 = S0v
W1 = UΓ ,
(39)
First, introducing Eq. (39)2 into Eq. (38) and taking into account condition (22)
yields
Z
Z
Z
T
0 T
0
∗
e
0 T
e
(40)
Sv
Ev + Ev v dΩ −
NSv UΓ q dΓ =
NS0v u dΓe
Ωe
Γeσ
Γeu
13
Second, introducing Eq. (39)1 into the traction boundary condition (34) yields
Z
Z
e
∗
0
T
UTΓ t dΓe
UΓ N(Sv + Sv )v dΓ =
(41)
Γeσ
Γeσ
Combining Eqs. (40) & (41) results in a coupled system of linear equations that can
be expressed in compact form as
F
−AT
v
pu
=
(42)
−(A + A∗ )
0
q
−pσ
where the submatrices on the left-hand side follow from Eqs (40, 41) and are given
by the following integrals
Z
Z
T 0
0 T
0
∗
e
Sv
Ev + Ev dΩ =
N S0v
Uv + U∗v dΓe
(43)
F =
e
e
ZΩ
ZΓ
UΓ NS0v dΓe and A∗ =
UΓ NS∗v dΓe
(44)
A =
Γeσ
Γeσ
and for the terms on the right-hand side it holds
Z
Z
0 T
e
pu =
NSv u dΓ , and pσ =
Γeu
Γeσ
UTΓ t dΓe
(45)
Note that Eq. (43) illustrates that the F matrix can be evaluated via a boundary
rather than volume integral. Thus all terms in Eq. (42) can be evaluated using
boundary integrals only.
The size of the system of equations to be solved simultaneously can be reduced
via static condensation, representing a significant reduction in computational effort.
First, from the first equation in Eq. (42), the generalised stress degrees of freedom v
are expressed in terms of the displacement degrees of freedom q as
v = F−1 (pu + AT q)
This is then substituted into the second equation of Eq. (42) to yield:
(A + A∗ )F−1 AT q = pσ − (A + A∗ )F−1 pu
(46)
(47)
This sparse system of equations is then solved for the displacement degrees of freedom
q. Subsequently, the stress degrees of freedom v can then be calculated on an elementby-element basis.
Our implementation of these HTS elements for composite materials (C-HTS elements) utilises displacement degrees of freedom that are associated with element
faces rather than vertices. This has the advantage that the bandwidth of the stiffness
matrix is minimised, as is interprocessor communication.
14
5. Numerical Examples
The performance of the key components of the proposed strategy (micromechanical solution, self-compatibility algorithm, finite element analysis convergence, etc.),
in terms of efficiency and accuracy, have been explored through two numerical examples.
5.1. Three ellipsoidal inclusions in matrix
This example comprises three ellipsoidal inclusions embedded in a cube of matrix.
The geometry of the problem is illustrated in Fig. 5 and details of the ellipsoids are
given in Table 2, including the semi-axes’ dimensions, centroid coordinates and Euler
angles φ, ν and ψ, which are successive rotations of the semi-axes a1 , a2 and a3 about
global coordinate axes z, x and z, respectively. The cube has side lengths of 600.
The displacement boundary conditions were prescribed on faces x = 300, y = 300
and z = 300 as ux = 0, uy = 0 and uz = 0, respectively. The remaining faces at
x = −300, y = −300 and z = −300 were subject to uniform normal unit tractions.
The Young’s modulus for the homogeneous matrix was chosen as E = 1 and for the
heterogeneities as E = 2. Poisson’s ratio was chosen as ν = 0.1 for both materials.
All units are consistent.
It is worthwhile noting that the small contrast in stiffness between the two materials was chosen deliberately to maximise the extent of the perturbation fields
emanating from the heterogeneities. Large contrasts in stiffness between the matrix and heterogeneities lead to perturbation fields that decay rapidly with distance
from the heterogeneities. The close proximity of the three ellipsoidal heterogeneities
to each other was also chosen deliberately in order to demonstrate the ability of
the formulation to capture the interaction of multiple heterogeneities. Furthermore,
the close proximity of one of the ellipsoids to a traction boundary was chosen to
demonstrate the ability of the formulation to capture boundary effects.
Incl.
1
2
3
Centroid coordinates
x
y
z
-48.07 78.27
14.81
16.45 178.64 -154.51
127.93 -65.94 -27.32
Semiaxes dim.
a1
a2
a3
50
75 100
50 100 75
100 75
50
Euler
φ
74.21
37.27
46.74
angles of
ν
48.44
22.27
11.17
max ai
ψ
-48.07
-25.51
-26.30
Table 2: Topology and geometry of ellipsoidal inclusions of triple inclusion problem
The problem was analysed using two three-dimensional finite element meshes
with different densities, comprising C-HTS elements. The coarse mesh comprised
15
z
y
x
Figure 5: Geometry and topology of triple inclusion problem
24 elements and 540 DOFs (Fig. 6a) and the second, refined, mesh comprised 192
elements and 3888 DOFs (Fig. 6b). Results from the two enhanced finite element
(a)
(b)
Figure 6: Triple inclusion task discretization by C-HTS elements: a) Coarse mesh with 24 enhanced
elements (540 DOFs) b) Finer mesh with 1,536 enhanced elements (29,376 DOFs)
analyses are plotted in the yz-plane (at x = 0). Fig. 7a and Fig. 8a show the two
meshes in this plane. The σyy stress component for both analyses are shown in
Fig. 7b and Fig. 8b.
In addition, a reference finite element analysis of the same problem was undertaken for comparison sake. The reference analysis utilised HTS elements but without
the proposed enhancement. Unlike the other two analyses, the reference analysis
utilised a mesh that explicitly resolved the three ellipsoidal heterogeneities and comprised 309, 406 tetrahedrons with 5, 596, 776 DOFs (Fig. 9a). The corresponding
mesh and stress results of the reference analysis are shown in Fig. 9. Comparison of
the stress results from the enhanced formulation and the reference analysis leads to
the relative error plots shown in Fig. 7c and Fig. 8c. It can be seen that even the
16
very coarse mesh with the enhanced formulation results in good agreement.
Further comparison of the stress results is shown in Fig. 10, where it can been
seen that along the traction boundary, the finer mesh of enhanced elements is able
to capture the imposed constant stress field more accurately than the very much
finer reference mesh.
The perturbation fields are based on the assumption of
(a)
(b)
(c)
Figure 7: Coarse mesh solution: a) Enhanced finite element mesh in yz plane at x = 0, b) σyy in
ref
2
yz plane, c) error calculated as (σyy
− σyy )2 /σyy
(a)
(b)
(c)
Figure 8: Finer mesh solution: a) Enhanced finite element mesh in yz plane at x = 0, b) σyy in yz
ref
2
plane, c) error calculated as (σyy
− σyy )2 /σyy
a heterogeneity in an infinite medium but the enhanced formulation still exhibits
convergence in the regions strongly influenced by the traction boundary.
5.2. L-shaped specimen
The proposed modelling strategy is also demonstrated on an example with a large
number of inclusion. A 3D L-shaped specimen with fully fixed boundary conditions
on the right surface of the right-hand arm and normal traction applied on the top
17
z
y
x
(a)
(b)
z
y
(c)
(d)
Figure 9: Reference analysis: a) discretization of entire body containing 309,406 tetrahedra, b) mesh
refinement on surface of heterogeneities, c) Reference finite element mesh in yz plane at x = 0, d)
ref
in yz plane.
σyy
(a)
(b)
Figure 10: Detailed 3D-plots of σyy stress concentrations due to the boundary effects in yz plane
at x = 0: Comparison of solution from reference analysis with a) coarse mesh C-HTS solution with
24 enhanced elements b) refined mesh C-HTS solution with 1,536 enhanced elements
18
surface of the left-hand arm is analysed, see Fig. 11. The length of the plate is 300 in
both x and y direction, the depth is 150 in z direction. The Young moduli were chosen
as E = 1 and E = 2 for matrix and inclusion respectively. Poisson’s ratio was ν = 0.1
for both material phases. The microstructure comprised 2,523 spherical inclusions
varying in size between 4 and 8 with a uniform spatial distribution (Fig. 11b). All
units are consistent.
The solution for three different mesh densities (Fig. 11c, d & e) are compared
in Fig. 12. These results are plotted on the x-y mid-plane. Fig. 12(a–d) shows
a plot of the σxy stress component for the three different meshes. These results
show that the complex stress distribution resulting from the heterogeneities can be
captured and that the solution is converging with mesh refinement. Further local
mesh refinement near corners and stress concentrations is possible, although this
was not undertaken in this case. As an estimate of the computational overhead of
the enhanced formulation for this particular problem on 16 processors, we note that
the total solution for 30, 007 C-HTS elements was 597s, whereas the problem on the
identical mesh of HTS elements for the equivalent homogeneous problem consumed
1.6s of computer time. This represents a large increase of computational time in
comparison to the homogenous problem. However, it should be noted that not all
aspects of the solution procedure have been parallelised. It should also be noted
that it was not possible to obtain the reference solution for this problem by means
of conventional FEA due to the excessive number of degrees of freedom associated
with a mesh required to resolve all of the heterogeneities. The mesh generation
itself was not possible using our currently available software and hardware facilities.
Furthermore, comparison with a PUM based solution, was also not undertaken due
to the complexity of the problem.
6. Conclusions
A new micromechanics-enhanced finite element formulation has been presented
for modelling the influence of a large number of heterogeneities in composite materials
in a computationally efficient manner. The strategy exploits closed form solutions
derived by Eshelby for ellipsoidal inclusions in order to determine the mechanical
perturbation fields as a result of the underlying heterogeneities. Approximation
functions for these perturbation fields are then incorporated into a finite element
formulation to augment those of the macroscopic fields. A significant feature of
this approach is that the finite element mesh does not explicitly resolve the heterogeneities, although the resulting solution still explicitly accounts for their presence.
In contrast with traditional homogenization approaches, this method does not rely
19
(a)
(c)
(b)
(d)
(e)
Figure 11: L-shaped specimen a) geometry, b) microstructure comprising 2,523 spherical inclusions,
c) coarse mesh comprising 1074 tetrahedral elements, d) medium mesh comprising 8772 elements
and e) fine mesh comprising 30007 elements.
on separation of scale and does not suffer from loss of information due to averaging
or localization.
The proposed technique has been implemented into a hybrid-Trefftz stress (HTS)
element formulation and it has been shown that the resulting enhanced elements (CHTS) require significantly fewer degrees of freedom to capture the detailed mechanical response compared to standard finite elements. The paper also outlines how the
proposed micromechanics approach could be used within a Partition-of-Unity (PoU)
formulation, although we conclude that this does not fully exploit the advantages of
PoU methods and that the proposed hybrid-Trefftz formulation is most appropriate.
A self-compatibility algorithm is used to determine the mutual interactions between inclusions, assuming that the eigenstrain fields are uniform within the domain
of each inclusion. It was found that even for topologies exhibiting extremely small
distances between the inclusions, this assumption is sufficient. Furthermore, it has
20
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Figure 12: Solution of L-shaped specimen on x-y mid-plane. a) microstructure. Plots of σxy
resulting from b) coarse mesh, c) medium mesh and d) fine mesh.
been shown that boundary effects, that are not accounted for by the classical micromechanical solution due to the assumption of an infinite medium, can be captured
through local mesh refinement.
21
We have implemented this formulation into our FE code that is optimized for
parallel computing. Additional parallelization of the micromechanical aspects of
the formulation needs to be investigated for increased efficiency. Further research
is required in order to incorporate other improvements such as nonuniform eigenstrains [14], debonding effects [24] and inclusions of arbitrary shape by evaluating
the perturbation functions numerically [12, 13].
Acknowledgements. Funding by the Glasgow Research Partnership in Engineering
(GRPE) under project “Multi-scale modelling of fibre reinforced composites” is gratefully acknowledged. This research was partially supported by the Czech Science
Foundation through project GAČR 103/09/P490 and by the Ministry of Education,
Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic trough project MSM 684077003. All the
analyses were performed by means of YAFFEMS FE code. For more details we
refer to the code’s homepage at http://code.google.com/p/yaffems.
Appendix A. Detailed solution of perturbation displacements
The displacement perturbation field in an infinite homogeneous material due to a
uniform eigenstrain ετij applied to an ellipsoidal region Ω is provided by the following
integral equation [14, Eq. (11.30)]
u∗i =
1
[Ψjk,jki − 2νΦkk,i − 4(1 − ν)Φik,k ]
8π(1 − ν)
(A.1)
where ν denotes the Poisson’s ratio and the elliptic potentials Ψij and Φij are defined
as [14, Eq. (11.32)]
Z
Z
1
τ
0
0
τ
τ
Ψij = εij
|x − x | dx = εij ψ, and Φij = εij
dx0 = ετij φ
(A.2)
0
Ω
Ω |x − x |
The integrals φ and ψ in Eq. (A.2) are the harmonic and bi-harmonic potentials
respectively. Note that in Eq. (A.1) and thereafter, standard index notation is
employed, together with the generalised summation convection due to Mura [14].
Thus, a P
repeated index is summed according to the Einstein summation rule (e.g.
ai bij = 3i=1 ai bij ), whereas a non-repeated
upper-case index equals to the lowerP3
case equivalent (e.g. ai bi cIj = i=1 ai bi cij ). The symbol ajk,i denotes the partial
derivative of ajk with respect to the coordinate xi .
By combining Eq. (A.1) and Eq. (A.2), we obtain
u∗i =
τ
1
εjk ψ,jki − 2νδjk ετjk φ,i − 4(1 − ν)δij ετjk φ,k
8π(1 − ν)
22
(A.3)
Similarly to Eshelby’s approach [17], the displacement perturbations are expressed
in compact form:
u∗i = Lεijk ετjk ,
Lεijk =
1
[ψ,jki − 2νδjk φ,i − 4(1 − ν)δij φ,k ]
8π(1 − ν)
(A.4)
where the third-order operator Lijk maps a transformation eigenstrain ετjk to the displacement perturbation field u∗i . It is therefore analogous to the well-known Eshelby
tensor [17], which relates a transformation eigenstrain to the strain perturbation
field.
The operator Lijk can be conveniently expressed in terms of the Ferrers-Dyson
elliptic integrals, e.g. [14, Eq. (11.36)]
Z ∞
ds
I(λ) = 2πa1 a2 a3
,
∆(s)
λ
Z ∞
ds
,
Ii (λ) = 2πa1 a2 a3
2
(ai + s)∆(s)
λ
Z ∞
ds
Iij (λ) = 2πa1 a2 a3
(A.5)
2
(ai + s)(a2j + s)∆(s)
λ
where ai stands for the i-th semi-axis of ellipsoid Ω and ∆(s) is obtained from
3
Y
∆ (s) =
(ai + s)2
2
(A.6)
i=1
The variable λ is the largest positive root of equation [14, Eq. (11.37)]
xi xi
=1
(aI + λ)2
(A.7)
Notice that λ is generally position dependent and non-zero for the points xi placed
outside the inclusion domain Ω, hence called the exterior points. Contrary, λ = 0
for interior points.
All integrals in (A.5) admit a closed-form expression in terms of the LegendreJacobi integrals of the first and second kind, defined as a fuction of an auxiliary angle
θ, [14, Eq. (12.17)]. It is worth noting that its definition via [14, Eq (11.18)]
s
a2
θ = sin−1 1 − 32
(A.8)
a1
23
is valid for interior points only and not everywhere as stated in [14]. Thus, it needs
to be replaced with a general formula:
s
a21 − a23
(A.9)
θ = sin−1
a21 + λ
available, e.g. in [25, 26]. Moreover, the following identity [14, Eq. (11.40.4)]
[xn xn Ii...jN (λ)],p = 2xp Ii...jP + Ii...j,p (λ)
(A.10)
will be repeatedly proved useful in the sequel.
It follows from Eq. (A.4) that to express operator Lεijk , we need to evaluate the
first-order derivatives of the potential φ and the third-order derivatives of ψ. To this
end, we start with expressions [14, Eq. (11.38)]
and
φ(λ) = 12 [I(λ) − xn xn IN (λ)]
(A.11)
n
o
ψ,i (λ) = 21 xi 2φ(λ) − a2I [II (λ) − xn xn IIN (λ)] = 12 xi Q(λ)
(A.12)
Employing Eq. (A.10), the first derivative of φ becomes
n
o
φ,i (λ) = 12 I,i (λ) − [xn xn IN (λ)],i = 12 [I,i (λ) − 2xi II (λ) − I,i (λ)] = −xi II (λ)
(A.13)
The third derivative of potential ψ is expressed from Eq. (A.12) as
ψ,ijk (λ) = 12 [δij Q,k (λ) + δik Q,j (λ) + xi Q,jk (λ)]
(A.14)
With the help of Eqs. (A.13) and (A.10), the term Q,j can be evaluated from
Q,j (λ) = 2φ,j (λ) − a2I [II (λ) − xn xn IIN (λ)],j = 2xj a2I IIJ (λ) − IJ (λ)
(A.15)
This provides the second derivatives of Q in the form
n
o
Q,jk (λ) = 2 δjk a2I IIJ (λ) − IJ (λ) + xj a2I IIJ,k (λ) − IJ,k (λ)
(A.16)
After utilising the derivatives of Q(λ) and re-ordering the indices, Eq. (A.14) becomes
ψjki (λ) = xi δjk a2J IJI (λ) − II (λ) + xk δji a2J IJK (λ) − IK (λ)
+ xj δki a2J IJK (λ) − IK (λ) + xj xk a2J IJK,i (λ) − IK,i (λ)
(A.17)
24
with IIJ,k and II,j provided by [14, Eqs. (11.40.1, 11.40)]
Ii...jk,p (λ) =
λ,p =
(a2i
−2πa1 a2 a3
λ,p ,
+ λ) . . . (a2j + λ)(a2k + λ)∆(λ)
2xp (a2I + λ)2
a2P + λ xi xi
(A.18)
Now we are in a position to evaluate Lεijk in terms of the Ferrers-Dyson integrals.
Introducing Eqs. (A.13) and (A.17) into Eq. (A.4) gives
[8π(1 − ν)] Lεijk = xi δjk a2J IJI (λ) − II (λ) + (xk δji + xj δki ) a2J IJK (λ) − IK (λ)
+ xj xk a2J IJK,i (λ) − IK,i (λ) + 2νδjk xi II (λ) + 4(1 − ν)δij xk IK (λ)
(A.19)
Since λ = 0 for the points inside the inclusion, recall Eq. (A.7), all derivatives of Ii...j
vanish as well. Therefore, Eq. (A.19) yields
[8π(1 − ν)] Lε,int = xi δjk a2J IJI (λ) − II (λ) + (xk δji + xj δki ) a2J IJK (λ) − IK (λ)
+ νδjk xi II (λ) + 4(1 − ν)δij xk IK (λ)
(A.20)
and Eq. (A.4) receives its final form
Lεijk = Lε,int
ijk +
1
xj xk a2J IJK,i (λ) − IK,i (λ)
8π(1 − ν)
(A.21)
For implementation purposes, it is worth noting that Eq. (A.4) admits the Voigt
representation:
τ
ε11
τ
∗
ε
L111 L122 L133 L112 L123 L113
u1
22
τ
ε
∗
33
u
= L211 L222 L233 L212 L223 L213
(A.22)
2ετ12
2∗
u3
L311 L322 L333 L312 L323 L313
2ετ23
τ
2ε13
References
[1] F. Feyel, J.-L. Chaboche, FE2 multiscale approach for modelling the elastoviscoplastic behaviour of long fibre SiC/Ti composite materials, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 183 (3-4) (2000) 309 – 330.
25
[2] M. Geers, V. Kouznetsova, W. Brekelmans, Multi-scale computational homogenization: Trends and challenges, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 234 (2010) 2175 – 2182.
[3] N. Sukumar, D. Chopp, N. Moës, T. Belytschko, Modeling holes and inclusions by level sets in the extended finite-element method, Computer Methods
in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 190 (46–47) (2001) 6183–6200.
[4] N. Moës, J. Dolbow, T. Belytschko, A finite element method for crack growth
without remeshing, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering
46 (1) (1999) 131–150.
[5] N. Moës, M. Cloirec, P. Cartraud, J.-F. Remacle, A computational approach
to handle complex microstructure geometries, Computer Methods in Applied
Mechanics and Engineering 192 (28–30) (2003) 3163–3177.
[6] G. Wells, L. Sluys, R. D. Borst, Simulating the propagation of displacement
discontinuities in a regularised strain-softening medium, International Journal
for Numerical Methods in Engineering 53 (5) (2002) 1235–1256.
[7] L. Kaczmarczyk, C. J. Pearce, A corotational hybrid-Trefftz stress formulation
for modelling cohesive cracks, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and
Engineering 198 (15-16) (2009) 1298 – 1310. doi:DOI:10.1016/j.cma.2008.
11.018.
[8] P. Kabele, Multiscale framework for modeling of fracture in high performance
fiber reinforced cementitious composites, Engineering Fracture Mechanics 74 (12) (2007) 194 – 209, fracture of Concrete Materials and Structures. doi:DOI:
10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.01.020.
[9] P. Nicolaou, S. Semiatin, A hybrid micromechanical-macroscopic model for the
analysis of the tensile behavior of cavitating materials, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A 35 (13) (2004) 1141–1149.
[10] A. Fritsch, C. Hellmich, L. Dormieux, Ductile sliding between mineral crystals
followed by rupture of collagen crosslinks: Experimentally supported micromechanical explanation of bone strength, Journal of Theoretical Biology 260 (2)
(2009) 230 – 252. doi:DOI:10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.05.021.
[11] Z. Sharif-Khodaei, J. Zeman, Microstructure-based modeling of elastic functionally graded materials: One dimensional case, Journal of Mechanics of Materials
and Structures 3 (2008) 1773–1796. arXiv:0802.0511.
26
[12] V. Maz’ya, G. Schmidt, Approximate approximations, American Mathematical
Society, Providence, RI, 2007.
[13] J. Novák, Calculation of elastic stresses and strains inside a medium with multiple isolated inclusions, in: M. Papadrakakis, B. Topping (Eds.), Proceedings of
the Sixth International Conference on Engineering Computational Technology,
Stirlingshire, UK, 2008, p. 16 pp, paper 127. doi:10.4203/ccp.89.127.
[14] T. Mura, Micromechanics of Defects in Solids., Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, P.
O. Box 163, 3300 AD Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1987. 587.
[15] J. Vorel, M. Šejnoha, Evaluation of homogenized thermal conductivities of imperfect carbon-carbon textile composites using the mori-tanaka method, Structural Engineering and Mechanics 33 (4) (2009) 429–446.
[16] B. Pichler, S. Scheiner, C. Hellmich, From micron-sized needle-shaped hydrates
to meter-sized shotcrete tunnel shells: micromechanical upscaling of stiffness
and strength of hydrating shotcrete, Acta Geotechnica 3 (4) (2008) 273–294.
[17] J. D. Eshelby, The determination of the elastic field of an ellipsoidal inclusion,
and related problems, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A,
Mathematical and Physical Sciences 241 (1226) (1957) 376–396.
[18] B. Pichler, C. Hellmich, et al., Estimation of influence tensors for eigenstressed
multiphase elastic media with nonaligned inclusion phases of arbitrary ellipsoidal
shape, Journal of Engineering Mechanics 136 (2010) 1043–1053.
[19] J. Melenk, I. Babuška, The partition of unity finite element method: Basic theory and applications, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
139 (1–4) (1996) 289–314.
[20] I. Babuška, J. Melenk, The partition of unity method, International Journal for
Numerical Methods in Engineering 40 (4) (1997) 727–758.
[21] G. Wells, Discontinuous modelling of strain localisation and failure, Ph.D. thesis,
Delft University of Technology (2001).
[22] J. Teixeira de Freitas, Formulation of elastostatic hybrid-trefftz stress elements,
Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 153 (1998) 127 –
151.
27
[23] Z. Bittnar, J. Šejnoha, Numerical methods in structural mechanics, American
Society of Civil Engineers, 1996.
[24] J. Ju, Y. Ko, Micromechanical Elastoplastic Damage Modeling of Progressive
Interfacial Arc Debonding for Fiber Reinforced Composites, International Journal of Damage Mechanics 17 (4) (2008) 307.
[25] J. D. Eshelby, The elastic field outside an ellipsoidal inclusion, Proceedings of
the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences
(1959) 561–569.
[26] M. Rahman, On the Newtonian potentials of heterogeneous ellipsoids and elliptical discs, Proceedings: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
457 (2013) (2001) 2227–2250.
28
| 5cs.CE
|
arXiv:1605.05577v1 [math.CV] 18 May 2016
AN IRREDUCIBILITY CRITERION FOR POWER SERIES
GUILLAUME ROND AND BERND SCHOBER
Abstract. We prove an irreducibility criterion for polynomials with power series
coefficients generalizing previous results given in [GBGP] and [ACLM1].
1. Introduction
The aim of this note is to provide a natural approach to an irreducibility criterion for
polynomials with power series coefficients (see Theorem 2.3). The first version of the
criterion has been given in [GBGP] and then has been generalized in [ACLM1]. In this
note we give a more natural and elementary proof of a general version of this criterion.
In particular, our statement holds over any field while the previous ones were only proven
for algebraically closed fields of characteristic zero. Moreover, the only hypothesis that
we need is that the projection of the Newton polyhedron has exactly one vertex while the
previous known versions were involving additional technical conditions.
Let us recall that the proof given in [GBGP] uses toric geometry and Zariski Main Theorem
while the one provided in [ACLM1] is based on a generalization of the Newton’s method
for plane curves. Our proof is essentially based on the following well known version of
Hensel’s Lemma:
Proposition 1.1 (Hensel’s Lemma). Let (R, m) be a Henselian local ring. A monic
polynomial P (Z) ∈ R[Z], that is the product of two monic coprime polynomials modulo
mR[Z], is in fact the product of two coprime monic polynomials.
We begin by giving some definitions and our main result (Theorem 2.3). In a second part
we give an example showing that our main result cannot be extended in a more general
setting.
Finally, let us mention that this irreducibility criterion is very useful in the study of
quasi-ordinary hypersurfaces (see [ACLM2] or [MS]).
2. An irreducibility criterion
We denote by k[[x]] the ring of formal power series in n variables x := (x1 , . . . , xn ) over a
field k. For any vector β ∈ Zn we set
xβ := xβ1 1 · · · xβnn
and for any positive integer q
xq := xq1 · · · xqn .
Let P (Z) ∈ k[[x]][Z] be a monic polynomial with coefficients in k[[x]]. We denote by
NP(P ) the Newton polyhedron of P (Z). Let us write
X
cα,j xα Z j .
P (Z) = Z d +
α∈Zn
,j<d
≥0
1991 Mathematics Subject Classification. 12E05, 13F25, 14B05, 32S25.
G. Rond was partially supported by ANR projects STAAVF (ANR-2011 BS01 009) and SUSI (ANR12-JS01-0002-01).
1
2
GUILLAUME ROND AND BERND SCHOBER
In this note we assume that P (Z) 6= Z d . The associated polyhedron of P , denoted by ∆P ,
is the convex hull of
dα
| cα,j 6= 0 + Rn
≥0 .
d−j
Note that ∆P is the projection of NP(P ) from the point (0, . . . , 0, d) on the subspace given
by the first n coordinates.
X
Definition 2.1. Let ω ∈ Rn
bα xα of k[[x]] we set
>0 . For a non zero element b =
α∈Zn
≥0
νω (b) := min{α · ω =
n
X
i=1
and Inω (b) :=
αi ωi | bα 6= 0} ∈ R≥0
X
bα x α .
α|α·ω=νω (b)
For such a ω and P (Z) ∈ k[[x]][Z] as before we define ωn+1 ∈ R≥0 by
min{v · ω | v ∈ ∆P }
∈ R≥0 .
d
Then we set ω ′ := (ω, ωn+1 ) and we define
ωn+1 :=
νω′ (P ) := min{α · ω + jωn+1 | cα,j 6= 0} = dωn+1
X
cα,j xα Z j .
and Inω′ (P ) := Z d +
(α,j)|(α,j)·ω ′ =νω′ (P )
This former polynomial is weighted homogeneous for the weights ω1 ,..., ωn , ωn+1 .
Definition 2.2. Let P (Z) ∈ k[[x]][Z] be a monic polynomial of degree d in Z. The
n
polynomial P has an orthant associated polyhedron if ∆P = dγ + Rn
≥0 for some γ ∈ Q≥0 .
In this case Inω′ (P ) does not depend on ω and we denote it by PIn , i.e.
X
PIn (x, Z) := Z d +
cα,j xα Z j .
α =γ
(α,j)| d−j
In this case we define
P (Z) := PIn (1, Z) = Z d +
X
cα,j Z j ∈ k[Z].
α =γ
(α,j)| d−j
If we write γ =
β
,
q
where β ∈ Zn
≥0 , q ∈ {1, . . . , d} and gcd(β1 , . . . , βn , q) = 1, we have that
xdβ P (Z) = PIn (xq1 , . . . , xqn , xβ Z).
Here is a picture of the Newton polyhedron of a polynomial having an orthant associated
polyhedron with n = 2 (thick lines represent the edges of the Newton polyhedron) :
Z
(0, d)
(α, j)
x2
dγ =
x1
dα
d−j
AN IRREDUCIBILITY CRITERION FOR POWER SERIES
3
Theorem 2.3. Let us assume that P (Z) is irreducible and has an orthant associated
polyhedron. Then PIn (x, Z) ∈ k[x, Z] is not the product of two coprime polynomials.
Proof. Let us assume that PIn (x, Z) is the product of two coprime polynomials of k[x, Z].
We denote by P1 (x, Z) and P2 (x, Z) these two polynomials, so we have
PIn (x, Z) = P1 (x, Z) · P2 (x, Z),
and we may assume that they are monic respectively of degree d1 and d2 (with d1 +d2 = d)
since PIn (x, Z) is monic. Let us write P i (Z) := Pi (1, Z) for i = 1, 2. Thus we have that
P (Z) = P 1 (Z) · P 2 (Z).
α
j
Let M = M (x, Z) := c x Z be a monomial of P (x, Z). We have that
M (xq1 , . . . , xqn , xβ Z) = c xqα+jβ Z j
and qα + jβ ≥∗ dβ since
Thus we have
(1)
α
d−j
≥∗
β
q
if j < d, where ≥∗ denotes the product order on Rn
≥0 .
P (xq1 , . . . , xqn , xβ Z) = xdβ P (Z) + Q(x, Z)
for some Q(x, Z) ∈ (x)k[[x]][Z]. In particular, P (Z) + Q(x, Z) = P 1 (Z)P 2 (Z) modulo
(x). Thus by Hensel’s Lemma
P (Z) + Q(x, Z) = Pe1 (x, Z) · Pe2 (x, Z),
for some monic polynomials Pe1 (x, Z) and Pe2 (x, Z) ∈ k[[x]][Z] equal respectively to P 1 (Z)
and P 2 (Z) modulo (x). So we have that
P (xq , xβ Z) = xd1 β Pe1 (x, Z) · xd2 β Pe2 (x, Z)
and
But we have that
i
h
xdi β Pei (x, Z)
In
= Pi (xq , xβ Z) for i = 1, 2.
xdi β Pei (x, Z) = Ri (x, xβ Z)
for some monic polynomials Ri (x, Z) ∈ k[[x]][Z] of degree di . Thus
P (xq , Z) = R1 (x, Z) · R2 (x, Z)
and RiIn (x, Z) = Pi (xq , Z) ∈ k[xq , Z] for i = 1, 2. Since PIn = Inω′ (P ) and RiIn =
q
Inω′ (Ri ) for i = 1, 2, for any ω ∈ Rn
>0 we can apply Lemma 2.5 for P0 = P (x , Z) to see
that R1 (x, Z), R2 (x, Z) ∈ k[[xq ]][Z]. Hence P is not irreducible.
Remark 2.4. The key point in the proof of this theorem is the fact that equation (1) is
satisfied when P has an orthant associated polyhedron.
Lemma 2.5. Let P0 ∈ k[[xq ]][Z] be a monic polynomial, where q ∈ Z>0 , and let us assume
that P0 = R1 R2 , where R1 and R2 are monic polynomials of k[[x]][Z]. Let ω ∈ Rn
>0 and
let ω ′ be defined as in Definition 2.1. If Inω′ (R1 ), Inω′ (R2 ) ∈ k[xq , Z] and if they are
coprime then R1 , R2 ∈ k[[xq ]][Z].
Proof. If char(k) = p > 0 let us write q = pe m with m ∧ p = 1. If char(k) = 0 we set
m := q and p := 1. Then we define
Y
e
Q :=
R1 (ξ1 x1 , . . . , ξn xn , Z)p
where (ξ1 , . . . , ξn ) runs over the n-uples of m-th roots of unity in an algebraic closure
n e
of k. Then Q ∈ k[[xq ]][Z] and Inω′ (Q) = Inω′ (R1 )m p . Thus Inω′ (R2 ) and Inω′ (Q)
are coprime. Hence the greatest common divisor of P0 and Q in k((x))[Z] is R1 . But
the greatest common divisor does not depend of the base field so R1 is also the greatest
4
GUILLAUME ROND AND BERND SCHOBER
common divisor of P0 and Q in k((xq ))[Z] hence R1 ∈ k[[xq ]][Z]. By symmetry we also
get R2 ∈ k[[xq ]][Z].
Corollary 2.6. Let us assume that P (Z) = Z d +a1 Z d−1 +. . .+ad ∈ k[[x]][Z] is irreducible.
Then we have the following properties:
i) If P (Z) has an orthant associated polyhedron the convex hull of Supp(Inω′ (P ))
is a segment joining (0, d) to (dγ, 0), and dγ is the initial exponent of ad for the
valuation νω .
ii) If P (Z) has an orthant associated polyhedron let u ∈ Zn+1 be the primitive vector
such that mu = (−dγ, d) for some m ∈ N, and set y := (x, Z). Then we can write
PIn (x, Z) = xdγ Q(y u )
where Q(T ) ∈ k[T ] is not the product of two coprime polynomials. In particular,
Q(T ) has only one root in an algebraic closure of k.
iii) If the Newton polyhedron of P (Z) has no compact face of dimension > 1 then
P (Z) has an orthant associated polyhedron and its Newton polyhedron has only
one compact face of dimension one which is the segment of i).
Proof. If PIn (x, 0) = 0 then Z divides PIn (x, Z). But by Theorem 2.3 PIn (x, Z) is not the
product of two coprime polynomials thus PIn (x, Z) = Z d . This contradicts the fact that
PIn (x, Z) has a non zero monomial of the form xα Z j for j < d. Hence PIn (x, 0) 6= 0 and
i) is proven.
We can write
PIn (x, Z) = Z d +
d−1
X
c(d−j)γ,j x(d−j)γ Z j .
j=0
So we have that
d−1
PIn (x, Z) = x
dγ
X
Zd
Zj
+
c
(d−j)γ,j
xdγ
xjγ
j=0
!
.
n
By i) we have that dγ ∈ Zn
≥0 . This implies that jγ ∈ Z≥0 as soon as c(d−j)γ,j 6= 0. For
any such j, let i ≥ 0 be such that
(2)
iu = (−jγ, j).
Then i ∈ Z≥0 since u is primitive.
P
Thus PIn (x, Z) = xdγ (y mu + i<m ci y iu ), where
ci := ciu+(dγ,0)
m
P
∀i.
i
We set Q(T ) := T + i<m ci T ∈ k[T ]. If Q(T ) has two distinct roots in an algebraic
closure of k then Q(T ) may be factorized as the product of two coprime monic polynomials,
let us say Q(T ) = Q1 (T ) · Q2 (T ), where Q1 (T ) and Q2 (T ) ∈ k[T ] are coprime and monic.
Let m1 and m2 be the respective degrees of Q1 and Q2 and define di ∈ Z≥0 by
(−di γ, di ) = mi u for i = 1, 2.
Then we have
PIn (x, Z) = xdγ Q(y u ) = xd1 γ Q1 (y u ) · xd2 γ Q2 (y u ) .
Moreover, by (2), a monomial of xd1 γ Q1 (y u ) has the form
j
Z
d1 γ iu
d1 γ
cx y = cx
= c x(d1 −j)γ Z j ,
xjγ
for 0 ≤ i ≤ m1 , i.e. for 0 ≤ j ≤ d1 . Hence xd1 γ Q1 (y u ) ∈ k[x, Z]. By symmetry we also
have that xd2 γ Q2 (y u ) ∈ k[x, Z].
AN IRREDUCIBILITY CRITERION FOR POWER SERIES
5
Then the polynomials P1 (x, Z) := xd1 γ Q1 (y u ) and P2 (x, Z) := xd2 γ Q2 (y u ) are coprime
which contradicts Theorem 2.3. Thus ii) is proven.
Let us assume that the Newton polyhedron of P (Z) does not have an orthant associated
polyhedron. This means that ∆P has at least two distinct vertices denoted by γ1 and
γ2 such that the segment [γ1 , γ2 ] is included in the boundary of ∆P . Thus the Newton
polyhedron of P has at least three different vertices a := (0, d), b := ( d−j
γ1 , j) and
d
γ2 , k). Since a, b, c are vertices of NP(P ) the triangle delimitated by these three
c := ( d−k
k
points is a face of NP(P ) so the Newton polyhedron of P has at least one face of dimension
two.
3. An example concerning compact faces of dimension > 1
Let n = 2 and let us replace the variables (x1 , x2 ) by (x, y) for simplicity. We set
P (Z) := Z 2 − (x3 − y 5 )2 + y 11 = (Z − x3 + y 5 )(Z + x3 − y 5 ) + y 11
seen as a polynomial of k[[x, y]][Z] where k is an algebraically closed field of characteristic
different from 2.
We will show that P does not have an orthant associated polyhedron, since ∆P has two
different vertices. On the other hand, we will prove that P (Z) is irreducible while for
every ω ∈ R2>0 the polynomial Inω′ (P ) is always the product of two coprime monic polynomials. This shows that Theorem 2.3 cannot be extended to polynomials without an
orthant associated polyhedron.
The Newton polyhedron of P (Z) is the convex hull of
{(6, 0, 0), (0, 10, 0), (0, 0, 2)} + R3≥0 .
The associated polyhedron ∆P of P (Z) is the convex hull of
{(6, 0), (0, 10)} + R2≥0
and has two vertices v = (6, 0) and u = (0, 10). For ω ∈ R2>0 , if 6ω1 < 10ω2 then
Inω′ (P ) = Z 2 − x6 = (Z − x3 )(Z + x3 ).
If 6ω1 > 10ω2 then we have that
Inω′ (P ) = Z 2 − y 10 = (Z − y 5 )(Z + y 5 ).
If 6ω1 = 10ω2 we have that
Inω′ (P ) = Z 2 − (x3 − y 5 )2 = (Z − x3 + y 5 )(Z + x3 − y 5 ).
Thus in all cases Inω′ (P ) is the product of two coprime polynomials (since char(k) 6= 2).
On the other hand, P (Z) is irreducible since (x3 − y 5 )2 − y 11 is not a square in k[[x, y]].
References
[ACLM1] E. Artal Bartolo, P. Cassou-Noguès, I. Luengo, A. Melle Hernández, On ν-quasi-ordinary
power series: factorization, Newton trees and resultants, Topology of algebraic varieties and singularities (Jaca, 2009), Contemp. Math., vol. 538, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2011, pp.
321-343.
[ACLM2] E. Artal Bartolo, P. Cassou-Noguès, I. Luengo, A. Melle Hernández, Quasi-ordinary singularities and Newton trees, Mosc. Math. J., 13, (2013), no. 3, 365-398.
[GBGP] E. R. Garcı́a Barroso, P. D. González-Pérez, Decomposition in bunches of the critical locus of
a quasi-ordinary map, Compos. Math., 141, (2005), no. 2, 461-486.
[MS] H. Mourtada, B. Schober, A polyhedral characterization of quasi-ordinary singularities,
arXiv:1512.07507.
6
GUILLAUME ROND AND BERND SCHOBER
Guillaume Rond, Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, Centrale Marseille, I2M, UMR 7373, 13453 Marseille, France
E-mail address: [email protected]
Bernd Schober, Institut für Algebraische Geometrie, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Welfengarten
1, 30167 Hannover, Germany
E-mail address: [email protected]
| 0math.AC
|
1
Performance Evaluation of Spatial Complementary
Code Keying Modulation in MIMO Systems
arXiv:1709.05525v1 [cs.IT] 16 Sep 2017
Amir H. Jafari, Timothy O’Farrell
Dept. of Electronic & Electrical Engineering,
University of Sheffield,
Sheffield, United Kingdom, S1 3JD
[email protected]
Abstract—Spatial complementary code keying modulation (SCCKM) is proposed as a novel block coding modulation scheme.
An input binary sequence is modulated based on the different
lengths of complementary code keying (CCK) modulation and
then spread across the transmit antennas (spatial domain) in
a multiple input multiple output (MIMO) system exploiting
orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM). At the
receiver side, zero forcing equalization is applied to the OFDM
modulated data to mitigate the effect of the multipath fast
fading channel and then followed by maximum likelihood (ML)
detection to retrieve the input sequence. The performance of
SCCKM in different MIMO systems is compared to that of
spatial modulation (SM) as a baseline scheme. Simulation results
show that for the same spectral efficiency, SCCKM is able to
substantially improve the bit error rate (BER).
Index Terms—multiple-inputmultiple-output (MIMO), orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM), complementary
code keying, spatial complementary code keying (SCCK) modulation, spatial modulation (SM).
I. INTRODUCTION
T
He increasing demand for a seamless wireless link with
ubiquitous coverage and higher data rate is causing
rapid growth of data traffic. Taking into account the limited
RF spectrum, such data deluge motives to conduct further
research to deliver more robust modulation, forward error
coorection (FEC) and equalization techniques that can boost
the performance over the physical layer. Significant progress
on modulation and coding techniques have been achieved,
many of which have been implemented in industry. However,
despite of such progress, there is an inevitable need for new
coding and modulation techniques that are more invulnerable
to the channel impairments and interference.
Spatial modulation (SM) [1][2][3] has been proposed as a
modulation scheme which aggregates the spectral efficiency
and mitigates the interference in a MIMO system. The scheme
is based on simultaneous use of modulation symbol and
transmit antenna number index as specific combinations to
form sets of codes that will be distributed across the antennas
[3]. SM maps the data stream to unique combinations of a
constellation symbol (according to modulation scheme) and
an index number of one transmit antenna as two data units
to carry the information, allowing an implicit transmission of
n extra bits per OFDM sub-channel where n equals log2 Nt
and Nt is the number of transmit antennas. Additional spatial
multiplexing gain, no need for transmit antenna synchronization, and avoiding inter channel interference (ICI) are its key
achievements.
Proposing more robust and spectrally efficient transmission techniques for MIMO systems, spatial complementary
code keying modulation (SCCKM) is an appealing scheme
by acquiring the characteristics of complementary sequences.
Complementary sequences [4] are promising set of codes that
profit from impulse response shaped auto-correlation function.
Indeed, the summation of the auto-correlation functions of
any two complementary sequences for any non-zero shift is
zero, enhancing the system’s resistance against inter-symbolinterference (ISI). Complementary sequences establish the
basis of complementary code keying (CCK) modulation which
was first introduced as an 8-bit (chip) spreading sequence
representing one symbol in IEEE802.11b [5][6] offering a chip
rate of 11 Mchps, and has been able to increase the data rate to
5.5Mbps and 11Mbps in an spread spectrum system [7]. Fig.
1 shows the correlation properties of both complementary and
8-bit CCK codes. For further study on CCK modulation can
refer to [8] [9] [10]. CCK codewords can be of various lengths,
however, we only study length two, four and eight, leaving
other lengths for future study. We further introduce a novel
spatial modulation scheme by applying CCK modulation to
the spatial domain known as SCCKM where CCK codewords
are embedded across transmit antennas in a MIMO system.
The rest of this paper is organized in the following manner. In Section II, we concisely discuss complementary and
polyphase complementary sequences and then derive length
two, four and eight CCK codes and discuss their properties.
In section III, we present SCCKM and illustrate how CCK
modulation is applied to a MIMO-OFDM system. In Section
IV, the performance of a SCCKM is studied and compared to
that of SM. Conclusions are drawn in Section V.
II. COMPLEMENTARY CODE KEYING
MODULATION
A. Complementary and Polyphase Complementary Sequences
Complementary sequences [4] as core of CCK modulation,
are set of codes for which the sidelobes of auto-correlation
functions of any two complementary pair summate to zero.
They consist of non-complex elements and are generated based
on the following kernel. Considering the two primary sequences M1 and N1 representing 1 and 1, any longer sequence
2
involves three phases. To maintain the symmetrical nature of
the modulation, the three phases are evenly distributed in the
constellation diagram and are specified as (0, 2π/3, 4π/3). (4)
is then used to obtain the 4-bit CCK codewords and demonstrates how the three phases presented in (3), are fundamental
to 4-bit CCK modulation.
φ 1 φ1 φ1 φ1
M1 = φ2 0 φ2 0
(3)
φ3 φ3 0
0
16
8−bityCCK
IdealyComplementaryyCodes
SumyofyAuto−CorrelationySeries
14
12
10
8
6
4
Considering the three phases, there are twenty seven phase
combinations and accordingly twenty seven 4-bit CCK codewords computed by (4).
i
h
(4)
C1 = ej(φ1 +φ2 +φ3 ) , ej(φ1 +φ3 ) , ej(φ1 +φ2 ) , −ej(φ1 )
2
0
0
5
10
15
Length
Fig. 1: Correlation properties of CCK codes.
can be constructed using Mk = Nk−1 Nk−1 and Nk = Mk−1
N̂k−1 where N̂ denotes the complement of the sequence N .
Polyphase complementary sequences [11] are similar with the
difference that they are made up of complex elements [12].
Elements of a polyphase sequence have unit magnitudes with
associated phase of θ and generated as presented by (1). It is
worth noting that phase recognition and accordingly (1) play
central role in generation of CCK codewords [12]. This will
be realized in the sequel as generation of different lengths of
CCK modulation are discussed.
(
1 if 0 < t < T
x(t) = p(t − kT)ejθ and p(t) =
(1)
0 otherwise
B. Two Bit CCK Modulation
The 2-bit CCK modulation takes a sequence of 2 bits as
the input stream. Two bits refer to two phases as shown in
matrix (2) and for sake of symmetry, they are determined as
(0, π). There are four phase combinations which are exploited
by (2) to derive the four 2-bit CCK codewords, noting that
each phase combination corresponds to one CCK codeword.
Table.I shows the computed 2-bit CCK codwords.
M0 =
φ1
φ2
φ1
0
,
h
i
C0 = ej(φ1 +φ2 ) , ej(φ1 )
(2)
C. Four Bit CCK Modulation
The 4-bit CCK modulation takes 4 bit sequences as the input
data stream. The matrix shown in (3) represents the phase
arrangement associated with 4-bit CCK codewords which
TABLE I: 2-bit CCK Modulation
To maintain the one-to-one correspondence between the
possible sixteen 4 bit binary input data streams and the
generated 4-bit CCK codewords, the optimum subset containing only sixteen 4-bit CCK codewords is specified in three
stages. In first stage, an statistically large number of random
subsets where each contains sixteen 4-bit CCK codewords
are selected. In second stage, the four dimensional Euclidean
distance between all sixteen pairs of all subsets are computed. This stage narrows down the number of appropriate
subsets by choosing the subsets that maximize the minimum
Euclidean distance. In the last stage, the number of times
that the specified minimum Euclidean distance exists within
all remained subsets is counted and the subset that contains
the least number of the specified minimum Euclidean distance
between its pairs is selected as the sub-optimum 4-bit CCK
codeword as represented in (5).
1
1
−0.5 + 0.866i
−0.5 − 0.866i
−0.5 − 0.866i
−0.5 − 0.866i
−0.5 + 0.866i
1
1
−0.5 + 0.866i
−0.5 − 0.866i
−0.5 + 0.866i
1
−0.5 + 0.866i
−0.5 − 0.866i
−0.5 + 0.866i
1
−0.5 + 0.866i
−0.5 + 0.886i
−0.5 − 0.866i
1
−0.5 + 0.866i
−0.5 − 0.866i
−0.5 − 0.866i
1
1
−0.5 + 0.866i
−0.5 + 0.866i
−0.5 − 0.866i
−0.5 − 0.866i
1
1
1
−1
−0.5 − 0.866i
−1
1
−1
1
−1
−0.5 − 0.866i
−1
−0.5 + 0.866i
−1
−0.5 − 0.866i
−1
−0.5 − 0.866i 0.5 − 0.866i
−0.5 + 0.866i 0.5 − 0.866i
−0.5 − 0.866i 0.5 − 0.866i
−0.5 − 0.866i 0.5 − 0.866i
−0.5 + 0.866i 0.5 − 0.866i
1
0.5 + 0.866i
−0.5 + 0.866i 0.5 + 0.866i
−0.5 + 0.866i 0.5 + 0.866i
1
0.5 + 0.866i
(5)
Binary Sequence
CCK Codeword
00
1,1
01
-1,1
The input data stream will be divided into streams of 4
bits and then arbitrarily modulated to 4-bit CCK codewords
presented in (5) which will be spatially distributed across
antennas.
10
-1,-1
D. Eight Bit CCK Modulation
11
1,-1
The 8-bit CCK modulation has been previously implemented in IEEE802.11b [6]. The 8-bit CCK modulation splits
3
TABLE II: Sub-stream phase allocation in 8-bit CCK Modulation
Bit Sequence
a1 a0
a3 a2
a5 a4
a7 a6
Phase
φ1
φ2
φ3
φ4
the 8-bit stream a0 a1 a2 a3 a4 a5 a6 a7 to four 2-bit sub-streams
where each sub-stream is allocated a phase as presented in table II. Based on the binary 2-bit sub-stream, the corresponding
phase of 2-bit sub-stream varies as shown in table III.
The four phases associated with 8-bit sequence are formulated in the matrix shown in (6) which clearly demonstrates
how the elements of (7) are constructed [12]. Inspection
of (7) demonstrates that each of its elements is indeed an
exponent that is powered to the sum of the phases forming
columns of the matrix given in (6) [12]. The minus sign
of fourth and seventh elements follows the rule discussed
in generation of complementary sequences. The 8-bit CCK
modulated codewords are shown in table IV.
φ 1 φ1 φ1 φ1 φ1 φ1 φ1 φ1
φ 2 0 φ2 0 φ2 0 φ2 0
(6)
M2 =
φ 3 φ3 0
0 φ3 φ3 0
0
φ4 φ4 φ4 φ4 0
0
0
0
h
C2 = ej(φ1 +φ2 +φ3 +φ4 ) , ej(φ1 +φ3 +φ4 ) , ej(φ1 +φ2 +φ4 ) ,
−ej(φ1 +φ4 ) , ej(φ1 +φ2 +φ3 ) , ej(φ1 +φ3 ) ,
i
−ej(φ1 +φ2 ) , ej(φ1 )
(7)
8-bit CCK modulation generates 256 different codewords
where 64 codewords are distinctively orthogonal. This orthogonality property results in low cross-correlation and consequently efficient interference mitigation which allows the
simultaneous transmission by multiple antennas in a MIMO
system.
E. Minimum Distance Between Complementary Codes
As discussed earlier, in order to minimize the bit error
probability, it is required to maximize the Euclidean distance
which highly impacts the performance of CCK modulation
[12]. In following, the minimum Euclidean distance achieved
by different CCK modulations considering their lengths and
associated phases are derived.
For a complementary code of length N , there will be
additional log2 N orthogonal codes together forming a subset
of length 1+log2 N . Considering there are M phases associated with each code, the number of bits per codeword
will be (1+ log2 N ) × log2 M and hence 1 + N/2 symbols
suffice to obtain the 1+log2 N required number of phases
through 1+log2 N phase equations where each phase is used
TABLE III: Numerical phase allocation in 8-bit CCK Modulation
ak+1 aa
00
01
10
11
Phase
0
π
π/2
−π/2
TABLE IV: 8-bit CCK Modulation
8-bit Binary Data Stream
00111011
2-bit Sub-Stream
00, 11, 10, 11
Phase Allocation
0, -π/2, π/2, -π/2
8-bit CCK Modulated Codeword
-i,1,-1,i,1,i,i,1
in N/2 of phase equations. The minimum Euclidean distance
between any two codewords is given in (8) considering that
the least phasor rotation between N/2 symbols is 2π/M .
Having computated the Euclidean distance for all 2-bit ,4bit and 8-bit CCK codwords, it is perceived that 8-bit CCK
modulation profits from maximum Euclidean distance among
its corresponding codewords in comparison to 2-bit and 4bit CCK modulations. This considerably lowers the bit error
probability which consequently improves the data rate.
r
N
2π
[1 − ej( M ) ]
(8)
dmin =
2
III. S PATIAL C OMPLEMENTARY C ODE K EYING
M ODULATION
The matrix B(k) of size m × Nsub denotes the input binary
sequence intended for transmission through the channel where
m varies according to the order of CCK modulation and Nsub
refers to the number of OFDM sub-channels. CCK modulation
is applied to the columns of B(k) where each column will
be block coded to generate CCK codewords of accordingly
desired length (two, four and eight). The generated CCK
codewords will be spatially spread across the transmit antennas
proposing the SCCKM scheme. The matrix C(k) is the output
of SCCKM which is of dimension Nt × Nsub and Nt is the
number of transmit antennas. A bank of OFDM modulators
are placed at the transmitter side where OFDM is applied
to each row of C(k). The OFDM modulated vectors will be
simultaneously transmitted by Nt transmit antennas across the
time-variant wireless channel where additive white Gaussian
noise and fading will degrade the signal.
The channel is represented by the block matrix H(τ, t)
which is of dimension Nr ×Nt and Nr is the number of receive
antennas. Each channel element is a vector of size 1 × p and
p represents the number of channel coefficients between each
transmit-receive pair.
h1,1 (τ, t)
h2,1 (τ, t)
..
.
H(τ, t) =
hNr ,1 (τ, t)
h1,2 (τ, t)
h2,2 (τ, t)
..
.
hNr ,2 (τ, t)
hm,n (τ, t) = hm,n (τ, t)1 hm,n (τ, t)2
···
···
..
.
···
···
h1,Nt (τ, t)
h2,Nt (τ, t)
..
.
hNr ,Nt (τ, t)
(9)
hm,n (τ, t)p
(10)
OFDM demodulation will be applied to rows of the received
signal matrix R(t) using the Nr demodulators at the receiver.
4
Fig. 2: Spatial complementary code keying modulation block diagram.
The output from OFDM demodulation R(k) is a matrix of
size Nr × m. To lessen the effect of the channel impairments, the output from OFDM demodulation is equalized
in the frequency domain by applying the zero forcing (ZF)
equalization to each of its column vectors (More effective
equalization techniques like minimum mean square (MMS) are
left for future study). Note that k represents the discrete time
index. The equalization process is performed on a sub-channel
basis which requires the channel corresponding to each subchannel. It should be mentioned that for non-symmetrical
MIMO systems, the pseudo-inverse is implemented for ZF
equalization. The equalized data stream will be divided into
sub-streams received on each sub-channel, and the Euclidean
distance between the sub-stream received on each sub-channel
and contents of the CCK codebook (which consists of all
the generated CCK codewords) will be computed. In this
scenario, the CCK codebook consists of L = m2 CCK codewords. The codeword E(k) resulting in minimum Euclidean
distance will be opted as desired one. The opted codeword
will then be de-mapped to the corresponding data sequence.
The cross-correlation properties of CCK codes mitigate the
impact of inter-antenna interference and dismiss the need
for inter-antenna synchronization. This allows simultaneous
transmission by all antennas on each subcarrier and hence
achieving spatial multiplexing gain.
R(t) = H(τ, t) ⊗ X(t) + N(t)
(11)
z(k) = H(k)−1 r(k)
(12)
X(t) and N(t) present the matrix of OFDM symbols and
the matrix of the additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN),
respectively and ⊗ denotes convolution in time domain.
j = 1, 2, ..., L
Ei (k) = min(d2i )
We consider different MIMO systems and transmit 1000
frames where each contains 20 OFDM symbols. The channel
is assumed to be a time-variant frequency-selective multipath
channel with a maximum delay spread of 50 ns. The multipath
channels are assumed to be statistically independent. The noise
is a temporally and spatially additive white Gaussian one. It
is assumed that full knowledge of the channel is available at
the receiver with perfect time and frequency synchronization.
The normalized signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (EbN0)
is used. Table. V summarizes the simulation parameters.
Fig.3 illustrates the performances of 2-bit SCCKM and SM.
The number of transmit antennas is kept at 2 while using
2, 4 and 8 antennas at the receiver. It is realized that spatial
diversity at the receiver side has a substantial impact on the
performance of both schemes. However, this impact is further
boosted in SCCKM. At EbN0 of 10 dB, increasing the number
of receive antennas from 2 to 4 and 4 to 8 lowers the BER by
∼ 38.46x and 183.59x in SCCKM and ∼ 12.65x and 51.02x
in SM-BPSK. In a 2x8 MIMO, the starting BER of SCCKM
is also ∼ 3.52x lower than SM-BPSK.
Fig.4 shows that in a 4x4 MIMO (employing the same
number of antennas at both transmitter and receiver sides),
4-bit SCCKM outperforms the SM. The SCCKM has a higher
spectral efficiency as it transmits 4 bits per sub-channel
comparing to SM-BPSK which sends 3 bits. SCCKM and SM4QAM offer the same spectral efficiency. However, at EbN0 of
10 dB, the SCCKM is capable to achieve ∼ 1.6x lower BER
than SM-4QAM. As pointed earlier, increasing the number
of receive antennas leverages spatial diversity which would
improve the performance of both SM and SCCKM schemes.
Fig.4 also illustrates the performances of SCCKM and SM in a
TABLE V: System Simulation Parameters
di 2 (cj , si ) = (cj − si )(c∗j − s∗i )
i = 1, 2, ..., Nsub
IV. SIMULATION
Parameter
(13)
(14)
d2 (cj , si ) refers to the squared Euclidean distance between
the received signal si on each sub-channel and each content of
the CCK codebook cj . Ei presents the CCK codeword with
minimum Euclidean distance associated with ith sub-channel.
Setting
Carrier Frequency (GHz)
2
Transmission Bandwidth (MHz)
20
Number of sub-channels
256
Number of Frames
1000
Numer of OFDM symbols
20
Symbol Period (ns)
50
Cyclic Prefix Length
16
Channel Delay Spread (ns)
50
Transmit Power (W)
1
5
0
0
10
10
−1
10
−2
−2
10
Bit Error Rate
BitAErrorARate
10
−3
10
2x2ASM−BPSK
2x2ASM−4QAM
2x2A2−bitASCCKM
2x4ASM−BPSK
2x4ASM−4QAM
2x4A2−bitASCCKM
2x8ASM−BPSK
2x8A2−bitASCCKM
−4
10
−5
10
−6
10
−6
10
−7
0
2
4
6
8
10
Fig. 3: BER comparison of 2-bit SCCKM and SM.
0
10
−1
10
−2
10
BitCErrorCRate
−4
10
−5
Eb/N0A(dB)
−3
10
−4
10
4x4CSM−BPSK
4x4CSM−4QAM
4x4C4−bitCSCCKM
4x8CSM−BPSK
4x8CSM−4QAM
4x8C4−bitCSCCKM
−5
10
−6
10
−3
10
10
−7
10
8x16 SM−BPSK
8x16 8−bit SCCKM
−1
10
0
2
4
6
8
10
Eb/N0C(dB)
Fig. 4: BER comparison of 4-bit SCCKM and SM.
4x8 MIMO system. It is clearly seen that at EbN0 of 9 dB, 4bit SCCKM reaches the BER of 0.06 × 10−4 in comparison to
BER of 0.07 × 10−2 achieved by SM-BPSK and SM-4QAM.
This suggests that while SM offers a lower spectral efficieny
(SM-BPSK transmits 3 bits per sub-channel), it yet requires
further increase in signal power to reach the same BER.
Fig.5 shows the performance of 8-bit SCCKM in a 8x16
MIMO system. Achieving the BER of 10−7 at BER of less
than 8 dB clearly demonstrates the unique performance of 8-bit
SCCKM. SM-BPSK only achieves the BER of 10−3 at EbN0
of 8 dB. This performance is partly due to spatial diversity
at the receiver using 16 antennas, and partly due to the point
that 8-bit SCCKM has got the best correlation properties in
terms of least cross-correlation comparing to 2-bit and 4-bit
SCCKM. The low cross-correlation of CCK codes (and in
particular 8-bit CCK), considerably boosts their resistivity to
both channel impairments and inter-antenna interference.
V. CONCLUSION
SCCKM as a novel spatial modulation scheme based on
different lengths of CCK modulation was proposed. It was
expressed that CCK modulation profits from low crosscorrelation property which enhances its resistance to interference. This particularly mitigates the inter antenna interference
and eases antenna synchronization in MIMO systems where
all antennas can actively transmit at the same time instant.
SCCKM was applied to a MIMO-OFDM system and its per-
10
0
1
2
3
4
Eb/N0 (dB)
5
6
7
8
Fig. 5: BER comparison of 8-bit SCCKM and SM.
formance was compared to that of SM. SCCKM outperforms
the SM by considerably lowering the BER at the same EbN0.
In a MIMO system with more antennas at the receiver side,
SCCKM results in notable BER reduction with starting BER
being less than 10−1 . The 8-bit SCCKM was also realized
as the most promising SSCKM due to its cross-correlation
properties.
R EFERENCES
[1] R. Mesleh, H. Haas, S. Sinanovic, C. W. Ahn, and S. Yun, “Spatial
modulation,” Vehicular Technology, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 57, no. 4,
pp. 2228–2241, 2008.
[2] S. Ganesan, R. Mesleh, H. Haas, C. W. Ahn, and S. Yun, “On the performance of spatial modulation ofdm,” in Signals, Systems and Computers,
2006. ACSSC ’06. Fortieth Asilomar Conference on, pp. 1825–1829,
2006.
[3] R. Mesleh, H. Haas, C. W. Ahn, and S. Yun, “Spatial modulation
- a new low complexity spectral efficiency enhancing technique,” in
Communications and Networking in China, 2006. ChinaCom ’06. First
International Conference on, pp. 1–5, 2006.
[4] M. J. Golay, “Complementary series,” Information Theory, IRE Transactions on, vol. 7, pp. 82–87, April 1961.
[5] “IEEE standard for information technology–telecommunications and
information exchange between systems Local and metropolitan area
networks–Specific requirements Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access
Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications,” IEEE Std
802.11-2012 (Revision of IEEE Std 802.11-2007), pp. 1–2793, March
2012.
[6] C. Jonietz, W. Gerstacker, and R. Schober, “Transmission and reception concepts for wlan ieee 802.11b,” Wireless Communications, IEEE
Transactions on, vol. 5, no. 12, pp. 3375–3381, 2006.
[7] A. Al-Banna, T. R. Lee, J. L. LoCicero, and D. Ucci, “11 mbps
cck - modulated 802.11b wi-fi: Spectral signature and interference,”
in Electro/information Technology, 2006 IEEE International Conference
on, pp. 313–317, 2006.
[8] K. Halford, S. Halford, M. Webster, and C. Andren, “Complementary
code keying for rake-based indoor wireless communication,” in Circuits
and Systems, 1999. ISCAS ’99. Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Symposium on, vol. 4, pp. 427–430 vol.4, 1999.
[9] S. bo Liu, A. Huang, Z. yang Zhang, and Z. Zhang, “Performance
analysis of cck modulation under multipath fading channel,” in Signal
Processing Symposium, 2004. NORSIG 2004. Proceedings of the 6th
Nordic, pp. 276–279, 2004.
[10] J. Mikulka and S. Hanus, “Complementary code keying implementation
in the wireless networking,” in Systems, Signals and Image Processing,
2007 and 6th EURASIP Conference focused on Speech and Image Processing, Multimedia Communications and Services. 14th International
Workshop on, pp. 315–318, 2007.
[11] R. L. Frank, “Polyphase complementary codes,” Information Theory,
IEEE Transactions on, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 641–647, 1980.
[12] R. van Nee, “Ofdm codes for peak-to-average power reduction and
error correction,” in Global Telecommunications Conference, 1996.
GLOBECOM ’96. ’Communications: The Key to Global Prosperity,
vol. 1, pp. 740–744 vol.1, 1996.
| 7cs.IT
|
Localization of protein aggregation in Escherichia coli is governed by
diffusion and nucleoid macromolecular crowding effect
Anne-Sophie Coquel1,3,4, Jean-Pascal Jacob5, Mael Primet5, Alice Demarez1,
Mariella Dimiccoli5, Thomas Julou6, Lionel Moisan5, Ariel B. Lindner1,2*, Hugues
Berry3,4*
1. Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Unité 1001, 75014 Paris,
France
2. Faculty of Medicine, Paris Descartes University, 75014 Paris, France
3. EPI Beagle, INRIA Rhone-Alpes, 69603 Villeurbanne, France.
4. University of Lyon, LIRIS UMR5205 CNRS, 69621 Villeurbanne, France
5. University Paris Descartes, MAP5 - CNRS UMR 8145, 75270 Paris, France
6. Laboratoire de Physique Statistique de l’École Normale Supérieure, UMR 8550 CNRS, 24
rue Lhomond, 75005 Paris, France
*Equal contribution; corresponding authors: [email protected]; [email protected]
1
ABSTRACT
Aggregates of misfolded proteins are a hallmark of many age-related diseases. Recently,
they have been linked to aging of Escherichia coli (E. coli) where protein aggregates
accumulate at the old pole region of the aging bacterium. Because of the potential of E. coli
as a model organism, elucidating aging and protein aggregation in this bacterium may pave
the way to significant advances in our global understanding of aging. A first obstacle along
this path is to decipher the mechanisms by which protein aggregates are targeted to specific
intercellular locations.
Here, using an integrated approach based on individual-based modeling, time-lapse
fluorescence microscopy and automated image analysis, we show that the movement of
aging-related protein aggregates in E. coli is purely diffusive (Brownian). Using single-particle
tracking of protein aggregates in live E. coli cells, we estimated the average size and
diffusion constant of the aggregates. Our results evidence that the aggregates passively
diffuse within the cell, with diffusion constants that depend on their size in agreement with the
Stokes-Einstein law. However, the aggregate displacements along the cell long axis are
confined to a region that roughly corresponds to the nucleoid-free space in the cell pole, thus
confirming the importance of increased macromolecular crowding in the nucleoids. We thus
used 3d individual-based modeling to show that these three ingredients (diffusion,
aggregation and diffusion hindrance in the nucleoids) are sufficient and necessary to
reproduce the available experimental data on aggregate localization in the cells. Taken
together, our results strongly support the hypothesis that the localization of aging-related
protein aggregates in the poles of E. coli results from the coupling of passive diffusionaggregation with spatially non-homogeneous macromolecular crowding. They further support
the importance of "soft" intracellular structuring (based on macromolecular crowding) in
diffusion-based protein localization in E. coli.
2
AUTHOR SUMMARY
Localization of proteins to specific positions inside bacteria is crucial to several physiological
processes including chromosome organization, chemotaxis or cell division. Since bacterial
cells do not possess internal sub-compartments (e.g., cell organelles) nor vesicle-based
sorting systems, protein localization in bacteria must rely on alternative mechanisms. In
many instances, the nature of these mechanisms remains to be elucidated. In Escherichia
coli, the localization of aggregates of misfolded proteins at the poles or the center of the cell
has recently been linked to aging. However, the molecular mechanisms governing this
localization of the protein aggregates remain controversial. To identify these mechanisms,
we have devised an integrated strategy combining innovative experimental and modeling
approaches. Our results show the importance of the increased macromolecular crowding in
the nucleoids, the regions within the cell where the bacterial chromosome preferentially
condensates. They indicate that a purely diffusive pattern of aggregates mobility combined
with nucleoid occlusion underlies their accumulation in polar and mid-cell positions.
3
INTRODUCTION
While aging is a fundamental characteristic of living systems, its underlying principles are still
to be fully deciphered. Recent observations of ageing in unicellular models, in absence of
genetic or environmental variability, have paved way to new quantitative experimental
systems to address ageing's underlying molecular mechanisms [1,2]. Further, the notion of
aging was extended beyond asymmetrically dividing unicellular organisms such as the
budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae or the bacterium Caulobacter crescentus -where a
clear morphological difference and existence of a juvenile phase distinguishes between the
aging mother cell and its daughter cells [3,4]- to symmetrically dividing bacteria. This pushed
aging definition to demand functional asymmetry as minimal requirement for a system to age
[5]. Specifically, Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis were shown to age as observed by loss
of fitness at small generation scale (<10) [6-8 (for B. subtilis),9-11] and increased probability
of death at larger generation scale (up to 250 generations) [12]. Age in this system was
defined as the number of consecutive divisions a cell has inherited the older cellular pole [7];
the sibling that inherits the older cell pole was shown to grow slower than the newer pole
sibling.
From a cellular viewpoint, aging is arguably due to the accumulation of damage over time
that degenerates cellular functions, ultimately affecting the survival of the organism [1,2]. In
the case of E. coli, a significant portion of the age-related fitness loss is accounted for by the
presence of protein aggregates that accumulate in the bacterial older poles [7,9,10]. Such
accumulation is reminiscent of many known age-related protein folding diseases [1].
Preferential sequestration of damaged proteins is also observed in S. cerevisiae between the
bud and the mother cell [14-16] and between specific intracellular compartments in yeast and
mammalian cell [17,18]. Therefore spatial localization, as non-homogeneous distribution of
damaged protein aggregates in the cytoplasm, has been postulated to be an optimized
strategy allowing cell populations to maintain large growth rates in the face of the
accumulation of damages that accompany metabolism during cell life [15,19,20]. These
results suggest that spatial localization of damaged protein aggregates could present an
ageing process conserved across different living kingdoms. Given the documented link
between protein aggregation and ageing, the short life-span, ease of quantification of large
number of individuals, molecular biology and genetics accessibility of E. coli may make this
bacterium into a relevant model system to elucidate protein aggregation role in a ageing.
A first obstacle along this path is to understand the mechanisms by which cells can localize
4
protein aggregates at specific locations within their intracellular space. Generally, thermal
agitation and the resulting diffusion (Brownian movement) of proteins forbid localization in
space on long timescale, since diffusion is a mixing process that will render every accessible
position equiprobable. Inside eukaryotic cells, active mechanisms such as directed transport
or sub-compartmentalization by internal membranes permit to counteract the uniforming
effects of diffusion. It is however known since the 1952 seminal paper by Alan Turing
[21] that subtle interactions between chemical reactions and diffusion can spontaneously
lead to steady states with non-uniform spatial extension. This is also true for bacteria, as
exemplified by the spatial oscillations in the minCDE system [22] or in the case of diffusiontrapping coupling [24]. Recently, the importance of precise sub-cellular localization of
proteins within bacteria has become apparent [24,25,26]. In absence of a general
cytoskeleton-based directed, active transport mechanism nor internal membranes, this would
favor diffusion-reaction based localization within bacteria (see however [13,27,28]).
Specifically it is still unclear whether for single-cell organisms, preferential localization
mechanism of damaged proteins is based on active directed transport or passive Brownian
diffusion. In S. cerevisiae, initial reports incriminated a role for active directed transport (actin
cytoskeleton) or sub-compartmentalization (membrane tethering) in the segregation of
molecular damages (damaged proteins, episomal DNA) in the mother cell [14,29]. Yet, more
recent reports contradict the need for directed transport, e.g. on the actin cable, and favor
diffusion-based localization [16,30,31].
In E. coli, protein aggregates have consistently been reported to localize in the cell poles and
in the middle of the cell [7,9,10]. The number of distinct aggregates per cell seems to depend
on the cellular environment. In non-stressed conditions, at most one aggregate per cell is
observed with rare cases (<4%) of two foci per cell detected [6]; under heat shock, most cells
contain two or three aggregates [8,9]. In heat-shock conditions, Winkler et al. [9] concluded
in favor of a Brownian passive motion of the protein aggregates. This study also pointed out
that one simple possible passive aggregate localization mechanism may be based on
spatially non-homogeneous macromolecular crowding. Indeed, in healthy cells, the bacterial
chromosome spontaneously condensates [32] thus delineating a restricted sub-region of the
cell called “nucleoid”, where molecular crowding is much larger than in the rest of the
cytoplasm [33]. Macromolecular crowding then alternates along the cell long axis between
low intensity zones (cytosol) and large intensity ones (nucleoid). Monte-Carlo dynamics
modeling suggests that such non-homogeneous spatial distribution of the molecular
crowding may be sufficient to localize large proteins to the cell poles [34]. In line with this
proposal are experimental reports that the observed aggregates preferentially localize in the
5
nucleoid-free regions of the cell [7,9], i.e. precisely in the regions of alleged lower
macromolecular crowding. In spite of these hints though, whether the transport of the agingrelated protein aggregates in E. coli is of a directed active nature or purely passive Brownian
origin remains elusive, since contradictory results indicate that this process would include
ATP-dependent stages [9].
Here, our aim is to determine whether the movement of aging-related protein aggregates in
E. coli is purely diffusive (Brownian) or includes some active process (ATP-dependent,
directed transport or membrane tethering). To this aim, we devised an integrated approach
combining time-lapse fluorescence microscopy of E. coli cells in vivo, open-source
automated image analysis, and individual-based modeling. Our results strongly indicate that
purely diffusive pattern of aggregates mobility combined with nucleoid occlusion underlie
their accumulation in polar and mid-cell positions.
RESULTS
Trajectory analysis of single protein aggregates
In vivo analysis of individual trajectories of proteins of interest (or aggregates thereof) is a
powerful method to determine whether the movement of the target protein is of Brownian
nature or additionally exhibits further ingredients (active directed transport, caging or
corralling effects, transient trapping, anomalous sub-diffusion) [16,35-40]. Here, we focused
on naturally forming protein aggregates tethered with the small heat-shock protein IbpA in E.
coli whose spatio-temporal dynamics have been implicated in aging of the bacteria [7,13].
To characterize the motion of IbpA-tethered aggregates in single E. coli cells, we monitored
intracellular trajectories of single foci of IbpA-YFP fusion proteins [7,41] in non-stressed
conditions (37°C, in LB medium, see Materials and Methods). For the automatic
quantification of the resulting time-lapse fluorescence microscopy movies, we developed
dedicated image analysis and tracking software tools (see Materials and Methods). This
software suite performs automatic segmentation and tracking of the cells (Figure 1A).
Moreover, it automatically detects the fluorescence aggregates foci and monitors their
movements relative to the cell in which they are located, with sub-pixel resolution.
Localization of protein aggregates is non-homogeneous along the cells
Detectable protein aggregates (in the form of localized fluorescence foci) were observed in
half of the cells monitored (54%; N
6
cells
= 1625 recorded in 72 independent movies), in
agreement with previous experimental reports [7,13]. No further foci were detected by
doubling exposure time (see materials and methods). This suggests that smaller undetected
aggregates that may exist either diffuse faster than the acquisition time and are therefore not
recorded as “localized”, or alternatively, that they merge into bigger, detectable aggregates
before full maturation of the fluorophore (≤ 7.5 min). [42]. Cells in non-stressed conditions
tend to exhibit smaller copy numbers of distinct protein aggregates than in heat-shocked
conditions (compare e.g. [7] with [9,10]). Accordingly, in our hands, nearly all the focicontaining cells (98.8%) displayed a single fluorescence focus within the imaging time, while
the remaining cells had at most two foci. The distribution of the (initial) spatial localization of
the aggregates is displayed in Figure 1. As a convention, we denote the long axis of the
bacteria cell as its x-axis and the short one as its y-axis (Figure 1B). In this figure, we
express the aggregate position relative to the cell center of mass, and rescale to [-1, +1]2
range. Thus the two bacterial poles correspond to x =-1 and x =+1 in this relative scale.
The histogram of the location of the aggregate at the starting point of each trajectory is
shown in Figure 1C. The distribution is highly non-homogeneous, with most of the
aggregates predominantly localized at one of the two poles, and the others mainly around
the middle of the cell. This distribution is similar to the results obtained in [7] (Fig 2-E-F in
[7]), except that here, since we do not differentiate between old and new poles, the amplitude
of the polar modes in Figure 1C are roughly symmetrical. Similar distributions were also
obtained in heat-shock conditions [9,10].
The marked localization of the aggregates suggests they might be tethered to the membrane
at the poles (and center) at some point of the aggregation process, thus restricting their
motion. Figure 1D shows the location of the polar aggregates at first detection (both poles
were pooled). Because these experimental results are two-dimensional projections of threedimensional positions, one cannot directly determine whether the aggregates are bound to
the cell membrane or spread in the three dimensional cytoplasmic bulk. To this aim, we
generated 104 aggregate positions (uniformly) at random in a volume of the same shape and
dimensions than the cell pole. Fig. 1E shows the two-dimensional projection of these
positions when the proteins were randomly located in the three-dimensional bulk whereas
Fig. 1F shows the two-dimensional projections when the proteins were randomly located on
the cytoplasmic membrane enclosing the bulk.
To quantify these plots, we analyzed the local density of protein positions in the twodimensional projections. Assuming the 2d projection of the pole is a semi-ellipse of radii ax
and ay (green dashed shapes in Fig. 1 D-G), its area is 1/2πaxay. The area of the elementary
7
semi-elliptic crescent Ds (gray in Fig. 1G) delimited by the semi-ellipse of radii sax and say
(0<s<1) and that of radii (s+ds)ax and (s+ds)ay is thus A(Ds)= πaxay ds(s+ds/2). Varying s
between 0 and 1, we counted the number of aggregate positions ns found within the semielliptic disk Ds and computed the corresponding density (correlation function) ρ(s)=ns/ A(Ds).
Therefore, when s approaches 1, ρ(s) represents the local density of aggregate positions
close to the external boundary of the pole (green dashed shapes in Fig. 1 D-F) whereas for
small s values, ρ(s) gives the local density of aggregate positions close to center of the pole
(i.e. the center of the semi-ellipse). To validate the approach, we generated random
aggregate positions directly in two dimensions (uniform distribution inside the 2D semiellipse) and checked that the density ρ(s) exhibits a constant value with s (Fig. 1H, dotted
black line).
When ρ(s) was used to quantify the data of Fig. 1E (aggregates in the bulk), the density was
roughly constant up to s~0.3 then decayed smoothly for larger values (Fig. 1H, blue line), in
agreement with the slight decay of the aggregate density close to the semi-ellipse boundary
that is already visible in Fig. 1E. By contrast, with the data shown in Fig. 1F (aggregates in
the membrane around the bulk), ρ(s) increased first slowly with increasing s, then very
abruptly close to 1 (Fig. 1H, red line), in agreement with the accumulation of aggregate
locations close to the semi-ellipse boundary that is already visible in Fig. 1F. Therefore,
these simulated data show that the distortions due to the projection in two dimensions are
expected to manifest as strongly increasing ρ(s) values close to s=1 if the aggregates are
tethered to the membrane versus smoothly decreasing ρ(s) if the aggregates are randomly
spread in the 3d bulk. Finally, we used this approach to quantify the experimental data
described above (Fig. 1I). The local density ρ(s) exhibits a non-monotonous behavior. Close
to the pole boundary, ρ(s) clearly shows an almost linear decay, which is very similar to the
behavior observed at large s for bulk simulations (Fig.1H). For small s values however, ρ(s)
increases with s, thus indicating a phenomenon that hinders aggregate location close to the
cell center. To conclude, these results plead in favor of a 3d bulk distribution of the
aggregates in the poles, thus rejecting the hypothesis that they would be tethered or
attached at the cell membrane.
Polar protein aggregates exhibit Brownian motion
We next quantified the displacements of the polar aggregates. To this end we used two
temporal regimes in our time-lapse fluorescence microscopy. Low sampling frequency (LF;
0.33 Hz) over long time scale (LT; 5 minutes) was used to assure that we monitor entirely the
range of displacements (n=1149), whereas high frequency sampling (HF; 1.67 Hz) was used
8
to increase the temporal resolution of the linear initial regimes observed in mean-squared
displacements. These conditions were optimized considering the trade-off between extensive
exposure leading to bleaching of the foci and satisfactory temporal resolution.
The resulting mean displacements along the x or y-axis are shown in Figure S1. For both
sampling frequencies, the mean displacement along the y-axis is roughly stationary and
fluctuates around a close-to-zero value. In order to analyze the fluctuations, we rescaled the
mean displacement along the y-axis so that it fluctuates around exactly zero.
The mean displacement along the x-axis displays a close-to-linear increase with time (Figure
S1) with a slope of around 0.05 µm/min, a value that corresponds to the linear approximation
of the cell elongation rate under our experimental conditions (doubling time around 30
minutes, during which the cell half-length grows from ≈ 1.0-2.0 to ≈ 2.0-3.5 µm). Therefore,
the raw movement of the aggregates along the x-axis is dominated by ballistic displacement
toward the pole under the effect of cell elongation. We corrected for this passive transport by
subtracting the increase rate of the cell elongation.
The corrected mean displacements (Figure 2A) are stationary and slightly fluctuate around
zero, for both HF and LF trajectories. This is a typical characteristic of Brownian motion
('random walk'). To confirm this hypothesis one has to study higher-order moments of the
displacement, in particular the second one. The resulting mean-squared displacement
<(u(t)-u(0))2> is displayed in Figure 2B. The LF and HF data here again are in very good
agreement, with the HF data nicely aligned on the LF ones. This agreement is an important
test of the coherence and quality of our measurement and analysis methodology. The inset
of the figure shows a magnification of the HF data until time t = 30 sec. For the first 10 to 15
seconds, the HF data exhibits a clear linear behavior. As expected from an unbounded
Brownian motion the same slope was observed for both the x- and y-axis. The non-zero
intercept with the y-axis is typically due to the noise in the experimental determination of the
aggregate position [43]. Such a linear dependence of the mean-squared displacement (MSD)
is a further indication that the movement of the aggregates is Brownian diffusion, as one
expects <(u(t)-u(0))2>=2Dut in the case of a random walk (where Dx or Dy are the diffusion
constant in the x- or y-direction, respectively). Using the first 15 seconds of the HF data, our
estimates yield Dx ≈ 5.1×10-4 µm2/s and Dy ≈ 4.0×10-4 µm2/s. Note that these values are at
best rough estimates since the data are averaged over aggregates of very variable initial
sizes (whose mobility is expected to vary accordingly; see below). Nevertheless, the fact that
the values for the x- and y-axes are similar is another indication of the isotropy of the
Brownian motion that seems to govern the movement of the aggregates. These values are
compatible with previous experimental reports of the diffusion constants of large multi-protein
9
assemblies in bacteria, such the origin of replication in E. coli (around 10-4 µm2/s [40]) but are
significantly smaller than the values reported for single fluorescent proteins such as mEos2
or GFP (1 to 10 µm2/s [39,44]).
Altogether the analysis of the first 15 seconds of the HF data pleads in favor of the
hypothesis that the aggregates' motion is due to diffusion, thus excluding directed transport
due to some active mechanisms. In order to further quantify the diffusive character of the
aggregates at hand, we divided the LF data into 5 classes of increasing initial median
fluorescence (table 1), so as to average data over aggregates of more homogeneous size.
As depicted in Fig. 3A & B, the initial slope of the MSD vs. Time curves increases when the
average intensity in the class decreases. Assuming that the initial median fluorescence is
proportional to the initial size of the aggregate, this result further supports a diffusive
behavior, for which the diffusion constant is expected to decrease as the molecular size
increases. Plotting the data in log-log scale (Fig. 3C & D) evidences initial slopes (i.e.
exponents of a possible power law) of 1.04+/-0.14 and 0.83+/-0.08 (on y and x direction
respectively; mean slope, excluding the highest fluorescent class, see discussion). Note that
the data for the y-direction are expected to be less noisy because they were not subjected to
correction for cell growth, unlike the data for the x-direction. Moreover, in the x-direction, the
aggregate movements appear to be restricted by a "soft" boundary (i.e. not a membrane, see
below), which is expected to hinder interpretations of the MSD curves. Even so, the value of
the exponent in the x-direction (0.83) is not significanly smaller than 1.0 (one-tailed t-test,
0.01 significance level). Therefore, we conclude from this data that the MSD at short times
(before saturation) evolves linearly with time (MSD ~ tα with α = 1), as expected from a Ficklike normal diffusion. This is in contrast with recent reports where anomalous diffusion was
recorded (α in [0.40,0.75]) for RNA-protein assemblies [45,46] and further supports our
conclusion favouring passive pure diffusion mechanism of protein aggregates in E. coli. In
our results, anomalous diffusion can be excluded except for the largest aggregate class
(black circles in fig. 3A-D); however, the movement amplitude of these very large aggregates
is too low to allow precise quantification. We further controlled for growth rate and cell-length
effects on the diffusion pattern observed. Among the different cells we imaged, the variations
in cell growth were very small, whereas cell length varied appreciably. However, the initial
slopes showed no significant differences when the data were clustered into sub-classes of
cell lengths (Figure S2).
Protein aggregates exhibit passive confinement within bacterial polar
10
region
Following the short, approximately 15 seconds linear regime, the MSD change with time
decelerates (inset, Fig. 2B) and reaches full saturation after about 40 seconds (LF data, Fig.
2B). MSD Saturation occurs in both x- and y-data at values of 0.030 and 0.040 µm2,
respectively. This corresponds to a restriction of the movements of the aggregates in a subregion of the bacterial interior, with characteristic size ≈ 400 nm. To understand these results,
one has to take into account the size variability of the monitored aggregates. Indeed, when
considering the 5 sub-classes of aggregates (Table 1), the observed saturation levels are not
constant but clearly decrease when the initial total fluorescence increases. This suggests
that the size of the large aggregates is of the same order than the cell dimension, so that the
intracellular space available for an aggregate of size r is in fact L-r << L (where L is the cell
size). In turn, this enables us to estimate the actual size of the foci, independent of the
microscope resolution.
To this end, we used the data in Figure 3A and C to obtain reliable estimates of the sizes of
the aggregates and that of the intracellular subregion in which they are confined. We used an
automatized procedure based on parameter optimization by an evolutionary strategy of the
parameters of an individual-based simulation for constrained diffusion (see Materials and
Methods for full description). In short, our strategy can be seen as an automatized fit of the
values of 12 parameters: the dimensions LX and LY = LZ of the intracellular subregion in
which the aggregates are confined and the average radius ri and diffusion constant Di of the
aggregates belonging to class i (i =1..5). We start by setting these parameters to initial guess
values. We then simulate the confined diffusion of 5,000 spherical molecules per class that
are endowed with the corresponding values of ri and Di (i =1..5) and diffuse in a spatial
domain which size is given by the initial guess values of LX and LY = LZ. The values of the
MSD (averaged over each class) in the x and y directions are then sampled during the
simulation at the same frequency (0.33 Hz) as in the LF data of Figure 3A and C. We then
compute the distance between the resulting curves for the simulated data and those for the
experimental LF data. This distance represents the least-square error between the MSD
predicted by the simulations using the initial values of the parameters. To minimize this error
automatically, we used an evolutionary strategy called CMA-ES (see [47] and Material and
Methods). CMA-ES automatically finds the values of the parameters that yield the smallest
distance between experimental and simulation data. Note that because the correction
procedure (that removes the effect of cell elongation) for the x-data is strong (i.e. the
aggregate motion in this direction is originally dominated by cell elongation), it is difficult to
apply this fitting procedure on the experimental MSD data for the x-and y-axis
11
simultaneously. This obliged us to fit the parameters separately on the x and y-data. The
numerical values indicated in table 1 represent the average of these two fits (the "±" values
indicate the total variation range).
The class-averaged MSD corresponding to the optimized parameters are shown in Figure
3A&C as lines and are in agreement with the experimental data. The best-fit values for the
cell dimension parameters are LX = 650 nm and LY = LZ = 750 nm. Considering our pixel size
(64 nm), we conclude that the value of the space available to the aggregate in the y and z
directions is close to the whole space available in this direction (around 900 nm). Therefore
the aggregate motion in the y and z directions seems to be constrained only by the inner cell
membrane. In strong contrast, while the total intracellular space in the x-direction ranges
from 2 to 5 µm (depending on the cell elongation), our fitting procedure indicates that the
aggregates do not move beyond 650 nm in this direction. As they are initially located in the
cell pole, this shows that the aggregates remain in the pole, where a passive mechanism
hinders their free movement and keep them from leaving a subregion spanning ≈ 1/4th to
1/9th of the total cell length. This is coherent with the positioning of the nucleoids, hindering
the diffusion of the aggregates (see below).
The experimental relation between the aggregate radius and diffusion constant, as
determined by the fitting procedure above (listed in table 1), shows a good fit to a StokesEinstein relation: D(r)=C0/r where one expects C0=kT/(6πη) (describing simple sphere
diffusion in a liquid of viscosity η) (Fig. 3E). We obtain a remarkable fit to the experimental
data with C0 = 47230 nm3/s. Note that a power-law fitting D(r)=C0/rb gives b=0.89+/-0.14 (thus
that does not exclude b=1.0) with a similar quality of fit (chi-square values). In the inset of
Figure 3E, the experimentally determined values of D are plotted as a function of 1/r. The
relation is linear except perhaps for very large values of r, thus emphasizing the very good
agreement with the Stokes-Einstein law.
These results confirm that some passive mechanism hinders the free movement of the
aggregates along the long axis. They also show that the aggregates follow the StokesEinstein law even for large sizes since the diffusion constant of the aggregates simply
decays as the inverse of its radius.
Simulation of aggregation, Brownian diffusion, and molecular crowding
reconstitutes the observed patterns
If the spatial dynamics of protein aggregates in E. coli is indeed based exclusively on
12
Brownian motion and aggregation, we should be able to reproduce by computer simulations
the observed spatial patterns of the aggregates described here and in previous experimental
reports [7,9,10]. In particular, given the relative simplicity of these two ingredients (diffusion +
aggregation), individual-based modeling is a very convenient tool in this framework. Here, we
used an individual-based model in which proteins diffuse via lattice-free random walks in a
3D domain that has the size of a typical E. coli cell (see Material and Methods and Figure
4A). When two molecules meet along their respective random walks, they form a single
aggregate with probability pag. The size of the resulting aggregate is updated according to the
size of its constituting molecules and its diffusion constant is updated as a function of the
aggregate size using a simple Stokes-Einstein law. In turn, such aggregates can combine to
form bigger aggregates.
The above experimental finding suggests that the aggregate's Brownian motion is restricted
in the x-direction over a distance that is comprised between 1/4th to 1/9th of the cell long axis.
These numbers are in agreement with the hypothesis that the physical structures that
hinders aggregate diffusion are the nucleoids, i.e. the subregion of the bacterial cytoplasm
where the chromosome condensates, thus increasing molecular crowding and diffusional
hindrance [33]. In a typical E. coli culture in exponential phase, most cells contain two
nucleoids [48] and the free space between each nucleoid and the closest pole end is around
500-600 nm (deduced from [49]). We thus tested the hypothesis (already pointed out in [7] or
[10]) that the restriction to the free movement of the obstacles along the long axis of the
bacteria is caused by an increased molecular crowding in the nucleoids. To simulate this
increased molecular crowding in our individual-based model, we added immobile nonreactive obstacles to represent the densely packed nucleoids (Fig. 4A, see Materials and
Methods).
Each simulation is initiated by positioning Np single proteins at random inside the cells. The
simulation then proceeds by moving the proteins via random walks and letting them
aggregate (with resulting update of the aggregate radius and diffusion constant) when they
encounter. The initial number of proteins Np was varied in order to account for different
experimental conditions. We used Np=100 to emulate experiments in non-stressed conditions
(as in this work) where one does not expect the presence of large numbers of proteins in the
aggregates. For experiments where aggregation is intensified using for example heat shock
treatment [9,10], one generally expects to recover more proteins in the aggregates. In such
conditions, the number of proteins in the aggregates was evaluated to be between 2,000 and
roughly 20,000 molecules [10]. Here, to account for these data, we used at most a total of Np
13
= 7,000 molecules in the simulations.
In the experiments, protein aggregates are detected by fluorescence microscopy when their
size is large enough; though we have currently no means to quantify this threshold size, we
estimate our detection limit to contain about 10-50 YFP copies, based on the detection of
slow mobile particles [50]. Therefore, in the simulations, we had to arbitrarily fix a threshold
for the number of proteins per aggregate above which the aggregate is considered large
enough to be detected. In non-stressed conditions (Np = 100), we used a detection threshold
of 30 proteins per aggregate, whereas with Np = 7,000 total molecules per cell, we varied the
detection threshold between 30 and 1750 monomeric proteins per aggregates.
We first focused on the distribution of the position of the aggregates at their first detection
along the bacterial long axis. The corresponding distribution is shown in Figure 4B. In nonstressed conditions (Np = 100), the distribution of the aggregate position is qualitatively very
similar to our experimental results (see Figure 1C): most of the aggregates are located in the
poles, the rest being mainly located in the cell center. This result is largely robust to the value
of the detection threshold of the aggregates. For very large values of the detection threshold,
the distributions of the aggregate location tend to decay inside the nucleoids and to increase
in the poles. However, outside such extreme ranges, the spatial distribution of the
aggregates is qualitatively robust to the detection threshold. In Fig. 4B, for instance, the full
lines correspond to aggregate detection thresholds ranging from to 5 to 50 proteins per
aggregate. The resulting spatial distributions are however similar and match all well with the
experimental result (dashed line histogram). This robustness is also observed when the initial
locations of the proteins are taken inside or immediately around the nucleoids (Figure S3A &
C). Importantly, in agreement with experimental reports, the nucleoids in the simulations are
not fully impermeable to the aggregates, since the probability to observe large aggregates in
the nucleoids is not null. Rather, the presence of the largest molecular crowding in the
nucleoids reduces the probability that large aggregates form in the nucleoids.
In addition, starting the simulation with a non-homogeneous distribution of proteins, such as
confinement to the nucleoid area or just englobing it, does not change the aggregate number
per cell and distribution outcome, though a short delay in the accumulation of aggregates in
observed (Figure S3, compare e.g. B & D with Fig. 4C & E, respectively). This is dictated by
the crowded nucleoid model we adopted with realistic mesh size that does not prohibit
diffusion of monomeric proteins within the nucleoid crowded area.
Another intriguing experimental result is that the number of aggregates simultaneously
14
present in a cell depends on the experimental conditions. In non-stressed conditions only
1.2% of the observed cells presented more than a single aggregate within the observation
time [7] whereas in heat-shocked conditions a majority of the cells present two distinct
aggregates, and the rest is roughly equally distributed between one and three protein
aggregates per cell. These observations are faithfully reproduced by diffusion-aggregation
mechanisms. Indeed, in our simulations emulating non-stressed conditions (100 proteins), a
vast majority of the simulations develop a unique detectable aggregate within the simulation
time (Fig. 4C). Despite the increase with time of the probability for a simulation to feature two
detectable aggregates per cell, the probability to observe only one aggregate remains largely
higher, even at the end of the simulations.
In simulated heat-shock conditions (see Figure 4D, total of 7,000 proteins) with a very low
aggregate detection threshold, virtually all simulations display at least 4 distinct detectable
protein aggregates per cell from the very beginning of the simulation. These results are
comparable with the experimental data obtained in [7], where the addition of streptomycin
was shown to strongly increase the size and number of detected aggregates per cell (to 5 or
more). When we increased the aggregate detection threshold (illustrated by a detection
threshold of 1750 aggregates in Fig 4E) the simulations showed very different behavior. For
short simulation times, we mainly observed cells with a unique detected aggregate. As
simulation time increases, the probability to detect a unique aggregate decays in favor of the
probability of detect 2 and 3 aggregates simultaneously in the cells. Eventually, most of the
simulations (around 60%) display two aggregates, and the others are roughly evenly shared
between 1 and 3 detected aggregates per cell, in agreement with the experimental results
reported in [10] that employ heat-shock triggered aggregation.
These simulations predict that the number of detected aggregates in the cell is crucially
dependent on two main factors: the aggregate detection threshold and the total number of
aggregation-prone proteins. Therefore they suggest that the discrepancy observed
concerning the number of aggregates per cell between non-stressed and heat shock
conditions is due to the larger quantity of aggregate-prone proteins resulting from the heat
shock. Taken together, our results show that the three basic ingredients we considered in our
simulations (passive Brownian motion, aggregation, increased molecular crowding in the
nucleoids) are sufficient to reproduce several experimental observations on the spatial
distribution and number of protein aggregates in E. coli. Therefore, they confirm the
conclusion drawn from our experimental results above that the movement of the chaperone
protein aggregates in E. coli is driven by passive diffusion (Brownian motion). They moreover
indicate that the observed non-homogeneous spatial distribution is not due to active or
15
directed aggregate movement but is a mere result of the interplay between Brownian
diffusion and molecular crowding.
16
DISCUSSION
Our objective in this work was to decipher the mechanisms by which protein aggregates in E.
coli localize to specific intracellular regions, i.e., cellular poles.
Using single-particle tracking of protein aggregates marked with the small heat shock
chaperone IbpA (inclusion-proteins Binding Protein A) translationally-fused to the yellow
fluorescence protein (YFP), our results indicate that protein aggregate movements are purely
diffusive, with coefficient constants of the order of 500 nm2/s, depending on their size.
Noteworthy, recent quantification of the movements and polar accumulation in the poles of
MS2 multimeric RNA-protein complexes and fluorescently-labelled chromosomal loci
concluded a high degree of anomalous diffusion, as reflected by slopes of 0.4-0.75 in log-log
plots of time-MSD relationships [45,46]. This suggests that unlike pure protein aggregates,
these complexes have further significant interactions with cellular components.
Applying evolutionary strategy for parameters estimation under the hypothesis of confined
diffusion, we used our experimental data to estimate the average size and diffusion constant
of the aggregates and the distances over which their movement is confined. As expected, the
aggregate diffusion constant decreases with increasing aggregate sizes, but, more
surprisingly, we find that the relation between the aggregate diffusion constant and their size
is in very good agreement with the Stokes-Einstein law, thus strengthening the
demonstration of pure Brownian motion. The agreement with the Stokes-Einstein law, that
predicts a decay of the diffusion constant as the inverse of the radius, D~1/r, was found valid
for all the estimated aggregate radii, even as large as 250-270 nm.
Recent experimental tests of the validity of this law in E. coli were more ambiguous. Kumar
and coworkers [51] quantified the diffusion of a series of 30–250 kDa fusion proteins (some
of which contained native cytoplasmic E. coli proteins) in E. coli cytoplasm and found very
strong deviation from the Stokes-Einstein law -even for small proteins- with very sharp decay
of the diffusion constant D~1/r6. However, using GFP multimers of increasing sizes,
Nenninger et al. [52] found very good agreement with Stokes-Einstein law from 20 to 110
kDa, i.e. up to tetramers, while the diffusion constant for pentamers (138 kDa) was found
smaller than Stokes-Einstein prediction. Moreover, deviations from the Stokes-Einstein law
was suggested an indication of specific interactions of the diffusing protein with other cell
components. A tentative interpretation of our observation that even large cytoplasmic protein
aggregates in E. coli do follow Stokes-Einstein law, would be that these aggregates actually
have limited interactions with other cell components. This hypothesis would match very well
17
with the putative protective function of the aggregates as scavengers of harmful misfolded
proteins, allowing their retention within large, stable objects [1].
A second major finding of our study is the demonstration that the Brownian motion of the
aggregates is restricted by the cell membrane in the section plane of the cell, while, along the
cell long axis, the aggregates are confined to a region that roughly corresponds to the
nucleoid-free space in the pole, thus confirming the importance of hindered diffusion in the
nucleoids. In further support to this hypothesis, we used 3D individual-based modeling to
show that these three ingredients are sufficient to explain the most salient experimental
observations. Our simulations exhibit spatial distributions of the aggregates that are similar to
those observed in non-stressed as well as heat-shock conditions. They also explain the
differences in the number of distinct aggregates per cell as a mere difference in the total
number of aggregation-prone (misfolded) proteins. Therefore, our results strongly support the
hypothesis that the localization of aging-related protein aggregates in the center and poles of
E. coli is due to the coupling of passive diffusion-aggregation with the spatially nonhomogeneous macromolecular crowding resulting from the localization of the nucleoid(s).
Our computational approach can be further extended to address asymmetric division of
cellular components in dividing cells. Due to computation time limitations inherent to
individual-based models, a valid approach to pursue would be to derive a mean-field model
of the diffusion-coagulation process, using e.g. integro partial differential equations with
position-dependent properties for the diffusion constant or operator (Laplacian) combined
with a coagulation operator [53]. This approach would allow to reach simulated times large
enough to account for several cell generations and focus on the location of the larger
aggregates along the lineage.
As a whole, our results emphasize the importance for diffusion-based protein localization of
the "soft" intracellular structuring of E. coli along the large axis due to increased
macromolecular crowding in the nucleoids. In addition to this implication in the localization of
aging-related protein aggregates, the structuring effect of the nucleoids has very recently
been evidenced in the accurate and robust positioning of the divisome proteins (that mediate
bacterial cytokinesis) [54] or the non-homogeneous spatial distribution of the transcription
factor LacI [55].
Wild-type E. coli cells (e.g., without any expression of fluorescent proteins) exhibit
qualitatively and quantitatively the same ageing phenotype in terms of gradual fitness as
those expressing fluorescent markers (as the IbpA-YFP fusion) [7]. Yet, in previous studies,
18
limited to very few ageing generations (typically less than 8), visible aggregates in wild-type
ageing cells were seldomly detected, probably because of the phase contrast detection
threshold (typically 500nm) [7]. To ensure that polar accumulation of aggregates is indeed a
phenotype of wild-type cells, we used the recently developed 'mother machine' microfluidics
system [12] to grow ageing wild-type E. coli through >150 generations. Under these
conditions, many of the ageing cells indeed accumulate clearly visible aggregates (Figure
S4), pointing to the validity of our approach to use the IbpA-yfp system for better detection
[7]. The mechanism described here for IbpA-yfp tethered aggregates can be generalized as
ample evidence exist for polar localization of aggregates resulting from heterologous overexpression of proteins, streptomycin treatment [7 and ref therein], large protein assemblies of
fluorescently-labelled protein fusions (due to avidity of low multimerization propensity of
some fluorescent proteins and independent of the diffusive positioning of the native proteins
studied [13]), large RNA-protein assemblies [45,46]. In all cases, given the non-specific
nature of hydrophobic interactions governing aggregate assembly, it is unsurprising that colocalization may occur amongst different aggregated polypeptides and chaperones, based on
the common diffusive mechanism of polar accumulation described here. Moreover, our
recent work demonstrates that large engineered RNA assemblies accumulate as well in the
cells' poles [56, (electron microscope images therein)]. Therefore, the polar localization
pattern of low diffusive elements in bacteria is not limited to large purely protein assemblies.
We propose that it might be a more general process concerning other cell constituents, such
as nucleic acids.
19
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial strains.
The sequenced wild-type E. coli strain, MG1655 [57] was modified to express an improved
version of the YFP fluorescent protein fused to the C terminus of IbpA [35] under the control
of the endogenous chromosomal ibpA promoter resulting in the MGAY strain. E. coli strains
were grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth medium half salt at 37°C. For more information about
the cloning, see [7], S.I.
Fluorescence time-lapse microscopy setup.
After an overnight growth at 37°C, MGAY cultures were diluted 200 times. When the cells
reached an absorbance 0.2 (600 nm), they were placed on microscope slide that was
layered with a 1.5% agarose pad containing LB half salt medium. The agarose pad was
covered with a cover-slide, the boarder of which was then sealed with nail polish oil.
Cells were let to recover for 1 hour before observation using Nikon automated microscope
(ECLIPSE Ti, Nikon INTENSILIGHT C-HGFIE, 100x objective) and the Metamorph software
(Molecular Devices, Roper Scientific), at 37°C. Phase contrast and fluorescence images
(25% lamp energy, 1 second illumination LF movies and 600 milliseconds for HF movies)
were sampled at two different time-scales. For low-frequency (LF) movies, images were
taken every 3 seconds for a total of 5 minutes, while for high-frequency (HF) movies,
fluorescence images were taken about very 0.60 seconds for a total of 2 min (and phase
contrast images were sampled about every 7 fluorescence images). Fluorescence excitation
light energy level used here is 5-fold higher than previously described [7] to allow
proportional decrease of exposure time, enabling a higher temporal resolution. Under these
conditions, doubling the exposure time did not result in further detection of fluorescent foci
yet resulted in accelerated bleaching that prevented consecutive time lapse imaging of the
observed foci.
Image analysis and aggregate tracking.
Phase contrast images were analyzed by customized software “Cellst” [58] for cell
segmentation and single cell lineage reconstruction. Phase contrast images were denoised
using the flatten background filter of Metamorph software for long movies or a mixed
denoising algorithm [58] for fast movies. The mixed denoising algorithm combines two
famous image denoising methods: NL-means denoising [59], which is patch-based and Total
Variation denoising [60,61], which is used as regularization. The Cellst software was used to
automatically segment the cells on most of the images, albeit when necessary, manual
20
corrections were applied. At the end of the whole segmentation and tracking process, Cellst
also calculates the lineage of every cell in the movie.
The fluorescent protein aggregates were detected by another customized software.
Detection of the maximal intensity pixel of each spot was realized using the a contrario
methodology based on a circular patch model with a central zone of detection and an
external zone of context. The patch radius was then optimized to optimally match the spot.
The energy of each spot was computed in the following way: the total image was modeled
as a sum of a constant background and 2D circular Gaussian curves, centered on the
maximal intensity pixel of the detected spots with a deviation of 3 pixels. The quadratic
minimum deviation between the image and the model enabled to calculate the Gaussian
coefficients. These coefficients were considered the energy values of each spot. The
coordinates of the detected spots were then refined to subpixel resolution. This was
achieved by computing a weighted average of the coordinates of the pixels in a circular
neighborhood of the detected spot. The weights were given by the intensity values of the
pixels to which the local background is subtracted. The local background was then computed
as the median value of the pixel intensity in the neighborhood. Only pixels having intensity
bigger than the median value were considered in the weighted average. This algorithm has
been tested on both synthetic and real image and it shown a precision of 1/10 of a pixel on
very poor contrasted spots.
After detection and localization, the movements of the fluorescent aggregates were tracked
and quantified by a third customized software named “aggtracker” based on the cell lineage
and the detected spots. The algorithm uses the lineage and cell information to ensure that an
aggregate is consistently tracked through points with points that are inside the same cell.
The output of this software are time-series for the coordinates x and y (in pixels) of each
fluorescence spot as well as the affiliation of the spot to the cell it is in. The last step
consisted in the projection of the coordinates of the fluorescence spot from their initial
absolute values in the image (in pixels) to their value along the long and short axes of the 2d
image of the cell. To this aim, we used active skeletons. A skeleton represents an object by a
median line (the center line in the case of a tubular bacteria). Here we used one active
skeleton for the long axis of the cell image and a second one for its short axis. Active
skeletons were adapted to bacteria in order to optimize the position of the skeleton in the
image of the cell. The coordinates of the fluorescence spots were then expressed as the
coordinate of the center of the fluorescence spot in the basis composed of the two active
21
skeletons that localize the cell long and short axes. We exploited the simple shape of the
skeleton to estimate the total cell width and length as that of the respective skeleton. As a
convention, we refer below to the aggregate coordinate along the long axis as the xcoordinate and that along the short axis as the y-coordinate.
In order to improve precision, aggregate trajectories made of less than 10 successive images
in the movies were not further taken into account. In total, we obtained 1644 aggregate
trajectories.
Individual-based modeling of protein aggregation.
To simulate the diffusion and aggregation process of proteins in a single cell, we used a 3d
individual-based lattice-free model. Each protein p was explicitly modeled as a sphere of
radius rp centered at coordinates (xp, yp, zp) in the 3d intracellular space of the cell. We
simulated protein diffusion in the cell and aggregation as they encounter using as realistic
conditions as possible. In particular, the radius and diffusion coefficient of the protein
aggregates explicitly increased as they grow. Moreover, we explicitly modeled the larger
molecular crowding in the nucleoids. Details of the simulations are as follows.
The bacterial cell was simulated as a 3D square cylinder with width and depth 1.0 µm [62]
and length 4.0 µm (chosen to correspond to a bacterial cell just before division) and reflective
boundaries. Note that we also ran simulations with more realistic cell shapes (i.e. spherical
caps at cell ends) and did not find significant differences compared to square cylinders
(except for the much higher computation cost with spherical caps).
Within each cells, we also explicitly modeled the larger molecular crowding found in the
nucleoids. Indeed, in healthy cells, the bacterial chromosome condensates into a restricted
sub-region of the cell called “nucleoid”, where molecular crowding is much larger than in the
rest of the cytoplasm [33]. To model this increased molecular crowding in the nucleoids, we
placed at random (with uniform probability) 50,000 bulky immobile, impenetrable and
unreactive obstacles (radius 10 nm) in the region of the cell where a nucleoid is expected.
Because cell cycle and DNA replication in E. coli are not synchronized, roughly 75% of the
cells in exponential phase contain two nucleoids [48]. We thus explicitly positioned two
nucleoids within the cell. The location and size of the two nucleoids were estimated from
DAPI-stained inverted phase contrast images of the nucleoids found in [49]. Both nucleoids
were 3d square cylinders of length 1220 nm (along the cell long axis) and width and height
532 nm. Each nucleoid started at 540 nm from each cell pole and was centered on the cell
long axis. The volume occupied by the two nuclei area thus formed is about 12%, which is
consistent with literature [63,64].
22
Each simulation was initialized by positioning Np individual IbpA-YFP proteins (monomers) at
non-overlapping randomly chosen (with uniform probability) locations in the free intracellular
space of the cell (i.e. the whole interior of the cell minus the space occupied by the obstacles
in the nucleoids). At each time step, each molecule is independently allowed to diffuse over a
distance d that depends on the protein diffusion constant Dp, according to d = (6 Dp Δt)1/2,
where Δt is the time step, in agreement with basic Brownian motion. Note that Dp itself
depends on the aggregate size rp (see below). The new position of the protein (x’,y’,z’) was
then computed by drawing two random real numbers, θ and c, uniformly distributed in [0, 2π]
and [-1,1], respectively, and spherical coordinates: x’=x(t)+d sin(acos(c)) cos(θ); y’=y(t)+d
sin(acos(c)) sin(θ) and z’=z(t)+d c where (x(t),y(t),z(t)) is the initial position of the protein. If
the protein in this new position (x’,y’,z’) overlaps with any of the immobile obstacles (i.e. if
there exists at least one obstacle such that the distance between the obstacle center and
(x’,y’,z’) is smaller than the sum of their radii) the attempted movement is rejected
(x(t+Δt),y(t+Δt),z(t+Δt)) = (x(t),y(t),z(t)). This classical approximation of the aggregate
reflection by the static obstacles is not expected to change the simulation results
significantly, but it drastically reduces the computation load. If no obstacle overlaps, the
movement is accepted, i.e. (x(t+Δt),y(t+Δt),z(t+Δt))= (x’,y’,z’).
After each molecule has moved once, the algorithm searches for overlaps between proteins.
Two proteins are overlapping whenever the distance between their centers is smaller than
the sum of their radii. Each overlapping pair was allowed to aggregate with (uniform)
probability pag (irrespective of their size). In our simulations, pag was varied between 0.1 and
1.0 (limited at the lower band by simulation time needed to score enough aggregation
events). To model the aggregation from two overlapping proteins, we could not, for
computation time reasons, keep track of the shape of the aggregates (i.e. the individual
location of each protein in the aggregates). Instead, we used the simplifying hypothesis that
all along the simulation, the aggregates maintain a spherical shape with constant internal
density. It follows that the radius of an aggregate C, born out of the aggregation of two
aggregates A and B of respective size rA and rB is rC = (rA3 + rB3)1/3. Upon aggregation, we
thus remove the aggregates A and B from the cell, and add a new aggregate with size rC,
centered at the center of mass of the two former aggregates A and B.
Finally, to set the diffusion constant of the aggregates, we used the classical Stokes-Einstein
relation for a Newtonian fluid, where the diffusion constant is inversely proportional to its
radius. In our case, this leads to Dp=D0r0/rp where r0 and D0 are the radius and diffusion
23
constant, respectively, of individual (monomeric) IbpA-YFP molecules. Note that this relation
could be violated for large molecules in the cytoplasm of E. coli [52,53]. In a subset of
simulations, we used power law relations, such as Dp ∝ rp-6, as suggested in [51], without
noticeable change in our results (except that the time needed to reach a given threshold
aggregate size was increased). Note that aggregation was considered irreversible in our
model (i.e. aggregates do never breakdown into smaller pieces). This is in agreement with
our experimental observations, where we never measured decay of foci fluorescence.
The diffusion constant of the 26-kDa GFP (radius 2 nm) in E. coli cytoplasm is around 7.0
µm2/s and that of the GFP-MBP fusion (72 kDa) around 2.5 µm2/s [37]. Using this data and
the Stokes-Einstein relation combined to our constant spherical hypothesis, led to estimates
of the radius and diffusion coefficient of the individual (monomeric) 39 kDa IbpA-YFP fusion
of r0= 3 nm and D0=4.4 µm2/s.
The value of the time step Δt has to be small enough so that proteins cannot jump over each
other during a single time step, meaning that the distance diffused during a single time step
is limited by d < 4r0. Using the definition for d above, one then has Δt < 8/3 r02/D0 ≈ 5 µs.
Here, we used Δt = 1 µs yielding d= 5 nm for monomeric proteins.
Every simulation was run for a total of 2×106 time steps. The translation of this value into real
time is hardly possible since we have no indication of the experimental value of the
aggregation probability per encounter pag (see above) even less so of its dependence on the
aggregate size. A lower bound can be estimated to 2 seconds real time (for 2×106 time
steps) if the aggregation is always diffusion limited (i.e. pag=1). On general grounds however,
the experimental value of pag can be expected to be smaller, so that the 2×106 simulation
time steps would correspond to more than this 2 seconds real time minimal value. For the
results to be statistically significant, we ran nrun simulations for each parameter and condition,
with different realization of the random processes (initial location, random choice of the
positions or of the aggregation events) and averaged the results over these nrun simulations.
In the results presented here we used nrun = 103.
Fitting procedure for the aggregate radius, diffusion constant and cell dimensions
The data from the LF movies were partitioned into 5 classes based on the aggregate
fluorescence intensity at the beginning of the measured trajectory, yielding 5 pairs of
experimental curves for the mean-squared displacement, <(xiexp(t)-xiexp(0))2>=fx(t) and
<(yiexp(t)-yiexp(0))2>=fy(t) where i={1,…,5} indexes the intensity class. Corresponding
theoretical values were obtained by individual-based simulations of confined random walks
24
similar to those described above but modified as follows: the cells, of dimensions LX (length),
LY = LZ = LYZ (height and width) were devoid of nucleoids or aggregation (aggregation
probability pag=0) and we used N=5,000 IbpA-YFP proteins. Each 12-uplet of parameters
{LX, LYZ, ri, Di} yields two theoretical curves (<(xithe(t)-xithe(0))2>=gx(t) and <(yithe(t)yithe(0))2>=gy(t)). The aim of the fitting procedure is to minimize the distance between the
experimental and theoretical curves, ie to minimize the cost function:
where the indices j are over the N time steps. The formulation of this cost function
corresponds to the traditional least squares, so that the optimization procedure actually looks
for best fits in the least-square sense (minimization of the squared residuals between the
theoretical predictions and experimental observations). To minimize automatically the cost
function F, thus adjusting the theoretical to the experimental curves, we used the C++
implementation of the state-of-the-art evolutionary strategy algorithm CMA-ES [39] with
population size 12 and 400 generations.
25
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank N. Hansen, for providing the source code of CMA-ES for various programming
languages (downloadable at http://www.lri.fr/~hansen/cmaes_inmatlab.html). We also thank
the CNRS-IN2P3 Computing Center (cc.in2p3.fr) for providing computer resources.
26
REFERENCES
1. Lindner AB, Demarez A (2009) Protein aggregation as a paradigm of aging. Biochim
Biophys Acta 1790(10): 980-96.
2. Nyström T (2011) Spatial protein quality control and the evolution of lineage-specific
ageing. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 366(1561):71-5.
3. Jazwinski SM (2002) Growing old: Metabolic control and yeast aging. Annu Rev
Microbiol 56: 769–792.
4. Ackermann M, Stearns SC, Jenal U (2003) Senescence in a bacterium with
asymmetric division. Science 300: 1920.
5. Kirkwood TB (2005) Understanding the odd science of aging. Cell 120(4) :437-47.
6. Stewart EJ, Madden R, Paul G, Taddei F (2005) Aging and death in an organism that
reproduces by morphologically symmetric division. PloS Biol 3(2): e45.
7. Lindner AB, Madden R, Demarez A, Stewart EJ, Taddei F (2008) Asymmetric
segregation of protein aggregates is associated with cellular aging and rejuvenation.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105(8): 3076-3081.
8. Veening JW, Smits WK, Kuipers OP (2008) Bistability, epigenetics, and bet-hedging
in bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol 62: 193-210.
9. Rokney A, Shagan M, Kessel M, Smith Y, Rosenshine I, et al. (2009) E. coli
transports aggregated proteins to the poles by a specific and energy-dependent
process. J Mol Biol 392(3): 589-601.
10. Winkler J, Seybert A, König L, Pruggnaller S, Haselmann U, et al. (2010) Quantitative
and spatio-temporal features of protein aggregation in Escherichia coli and
consequences on protein quality control and cellular ageing. EMBO J 29(5): 910-923.
11. Lele UN, Baig UI, Watve MG (2011) Phenotypic plasticity and effects of selection on
27
cell division symmetry in Escherichia coli. PLoS ONE 6(1): e14516.
12. Wang P, Robert L, Pelletier J, Dang WL, Taddei F, Wright A. Jun S (2010) Robust
growth of Escherichia coli. Curr Biol 20(12):1099-103.
13. Landgraf D., Okumus B, Chien P, Baker TA, Paulsson J (2012) Segregation of
molecules at cell division reveals native protein localization. Nat Methods 9(5): 480482.
14. Aguilaniu H, Gustafsson L, Rigoulet M, Nyström T (2003) Asymmetric inheritance of
oxidatively damaged proteins during cytokinesis. Science. 299(5613): 1751–1753.
15. Erjavec N, Cvijovic M, Klipp E, Nyström T (2008) Selective benefits of damage
partitioning in unicellular systems and its effects on aging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
105(48): 18764-18769.
16. Zhou C, Slaughter BD, Unruh JR, Eldakak A, Rubinstein B, et al. (2011) Motility and
segregation of Hsp104-associated protein aggregates in budding yeast. Cell 147(5):
1186-1196.
17. Kaganovich D, Kopito R, Frydman J (2008) Misfolded proteins partition between two
distinct quality control compartments. Nature 454((7208): 1088–1095.
18. Rujano MA, Bosveld F, Salomons FA, Dijk F, van Waarde MA, et al. (2006) Polarised
asymmetric inheritance of accumulated protein damage in higher eukaryotes. PloS
Biol 4(12): e417.
19. Watve M, Parab S, Jogdand P, Keni S (2006) Aging may be a conditional strategic
choice and not an inevitable outcome for bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103(40):
14831-14835.
20. Chao L (2010) A model for damage load and its implication for the evolution of
bacterial aging. PloS Genet 6(8).
21. Turing AM (1953) The chemical basis of morphogenesis. Bull Math Biol 52(1-2): 153197.
28
22. Kruse K, Howard M, Margolin W (2007) An experimentalist’s guide to computational
modelling of the Min system. Mol Microbiol 6(5): 1279-1284.
23. Wang H, Wingreen NS, Mukhopadhyay R (2008) Self-organized periodicity of protein
clusters in growing bacteria. Phys Rev Lett 101(21): 218101.
24. Shapiro L, McAdams HH, Losick R (2009) Why and How Bacteria Localize Proteins.
Science 326(5957): 1225-1228.
25. Iniesta AA, Hillson NJ, Shapiro L (2010) Cell pole-specific activation of a critical
bacterial cell cycle kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107(15): 7012-7017.
26. Ramamurthi KS, Lecuyer S, Stone HA, Losick R (2009) Geometric cue for protein
localization in a bacterium. Science 323(5919):1354-7.
27. Sun M, Wartel M, Cascales E, Shaevitz JW, Mignot T (2011) Motor-driven
intracellular transport powers bacterial gliding motility. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
108(18): 7559-7564.
28. Domínguez-Escobar J, Chastanet A, Crevenna AH, Fromion V, Wedlich-Söldner R, et
al. (2011) Processive movement of MreB-Associated cell wall biosynthetic complexes
in bacteria. Science 333 (6039): 225-228.
29. Shcheprova Z, Baldi S, Frei SB, Gonnet G, Barrai Y (2008) A mechanism for
asymmetric segregation of age during yeast budding. Nature 454(7205): 728–734.
30. Gehlen LR, Nagai S, Shimada K, Meister P, taddei A, et al. (2011) Nuclear geometry
and rapid mitosis ensure asymmetric episome segregation in yeast. Curr Biol 21(1):
25–33.
31. Spokoini, R, Moldavski O, Nahimas Y, England JL, Schuldiner M, et al. Confinement
to Organelle-Associated Inclusion Structures Mediates Asymmetric Inheritance of
Aggregated Protein in Budding Yeast. Cell Rep pii: S2211-1247(12)00264-1.
32. Mondal J, Bratton BP, Li Y, Yethiraj A, Weisshaar JC (2011) Entropy-based
mechanism of ribosome-nucleoid segregation in E. coli cells. Biophys J 100(11):
2605-2613.
29
33. Foley L, Wilson DB, Shuler ML (2010) Macromolecular crowding can account for
RNase-sensitive constraint of bacterial nucleoid structure. Biochem Biophys Res
Commun 395(1): 42-47.
34. Saberi S, Emberly E (2010) Chromosome driven spatial patterning of proteins in
bacteria. PloS Comput Biol 6(11): e10000986.
35. Qian H, Sheetz MP, Elson EL (1991) Single particle tracking. Analysis of diffusion and
flow in two-dimensional systems. Biophys J 60(4): 910-921.
36. Platani M, Goldberg I, Lamond AI, Swedlow JR (2002) Cajal body dynamics and
association with chromatin are ATP-dependent. Nat Cell Biol 4(7): 502-508.
37. Bronstein I, Israel Y, Kepten E, Mai S, Shav-Tal Y, et al. (2009) Transient anomalous
diffusion of telomeres in the nucleus of mammalian cells. Phys Rev Lett 103(1):
018102.
38. Bakshi S, Bratton BP, Weisshaar JC (2011) Subdiffraction-limit study of Kaede
diffusion and spatial distribution in live Escherichia coli. Biophys J. 101(10): 25352544.
39. English BP, Hauryliuk V, Sanamrad A, Tankov S, Dekker NH, et al. (2011) Singlemolecule investigations of the stringent response machinery in living bacterial cells.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108(31): 365-373.
40. Sliusarenko O, Heinritz J, Emonet T, Jacobs-Wagner C (2011) High-throughput,
subpixel precision analysis of bacterial morphogenesis and intracellular spatiotemporal dynamics. Mol Microbiol 80(3): 612-627.
41. Allen SP, Polazzi JO, Gierse JK, Easton AM (1992) Two novel heat shock genes
encoding proteins produced in response to heterologous protein expression in
Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 174(21): 6938-6947.
42. Nagai T, Ibata K, Park ES, Kubota M, Mikoshiba K, Miyawaki A (2002) A variant of
yellow fluorescent protein with fast and efficient maturation for cell-biological
applications. Nat Biotechnol. 20(1):87-90.
30
43. Savin T, Doyle PS (2005) Static and dynamic errors in particle tracking
microrheology. Biophys J 88(1): 623-638.
44. Elowitz MB, Surette MG, Wolf PE, Stock JB, Leibler S (1999) Protein mobility in the
cytoplasm of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 181(1): 197-203.
45. Golding I, Cox EC (2006) Physical nature of bacterial cytoplasm. Phys Rev Lett
96(9):098102.
46. Weber SC, Spakowitz AJ, Theriot JA (2010) Bacterial chromosomal loci move
subdiffusively through a viscoelastic cytoplasm. Phys Rev Letter 104(23):238102.
47. Hansen N, Ostermeier A (2001) Completely derandomized delf-adaptation in
evolution strategies. Evol Comput 9(2): 159-195.
48. Donachie WD, Begg KJ (1989) Chromosome partition in Escherichia coli requires
postreplication protein synthesis. J Bacteriol 171(10): 5405-5409.
49. Zimmerman SB (2006) Shape and compaction of Escherichia coli nucleoids. J Struct
Biol 156(2): 255-261.
50. Xie XS (2010) Enzymology and life and the single molecule level. Single Molecule
Spectroscopy in Chemistry, Physics and Biology Nobel Symposium. Edited by Astrid
Graslund, et al. Springer Series in Chemical Physics, Springer-Verlag Berlin
Heidelberg. pp. 435-448.
51. Kumar M, Mommer MS, Sourjik V (2010) Mobility of cytoplasmic membrane, and
DNA-binding proteins in Escherichia coli. Biophys J 98(4): 552-559.
52. Nenninger A, Mastroianni G, Mullineaux CW (2010) Size dependence of protein
diffusion in the cytoplasm of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 192(18): 4535-4540.
53. Laurençot P, Mischler S (2004) On coalescence equations and related models. In
Modeling and computational methods for kinetic equations, Model. Simul. Sci. Eng.
Technol., pages 321–356. Birkhauser Boston, Boston, MA.
31
54. Männik J, Wu F, Hol FJ, Bisicchia P, Sherratt DJ, et al. (2012) Robustness and
accuracy of cell division in Escherichia coli in diverse cell shapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci
U S A 109(18): 6957-6962.
55. Kuhlman TE, Cox EC (2012) Gene location and DNA density determine transcription
factor distributions in Escherichia coli. Mol Syst Biol 8:610.
56. Delebecque CJ, Lindner AB, Silver PA, Aldaye FA (2011) Organization of intracellular
reactions with rationally designed RNA assemblies. Science 333(6041): 470-474.
57. Blattner FR, Plunkett G “rd, Bloch CA, Perna NT, Burland V, et al. (1997) The
complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12. Science 277(5331): 1453-1474.
58. Primet M, Demarez A, Taddei F, Lindner AB, Moisan L (2008) Tracking of cells in a
sequence of images using a low-dimension image representation. 5th IEEE
International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro (ISBI) 995998.
59. Rudin LI, Osher S, Fatemi E (1992) Nonlinear total variation based noise removal
algorithms, Physica D 60: 259-268
60. Louchet C, Moisan L (2011) Total Variation as a local filter. SIAM Journal on Imaging
Sciences 4 (2): 651-694.
61. Buades A, Coll B, Morel JM (2005) A review of image denoising algorithms, with a
new one. SIAM Multiscale Modeling and Simulation. 4(2): 490-530.
62. Volkmer B, Heinemann M (2011) Condition-dependent cell volume and concentration
of Escherichia coli to facilitate data conversion for systems biology modeling. PloS
One 6(7): e23126.
63. Woldringh CL, Odijk T (1999) Structure of dna within the bacterial cell: physics and
physiology. Charlesbos R, ed. Organization for the prokaryotic genome, American
Society of Microbiolgy Press.171 p.
64. Odijk T (1998) Osmotic compaction of supercoiled dna into a bacterial nucleoid.
32
Biophys Chem 73(1-2): 23-29.
33
FIGURE LEGENDS
Figure 1: Localization of the detected aggregates in the cells
(A) In each image on the time-lapse fluorescence movies, the bacterial cells are
automatically isolated (each individual cell is given a unique random color). The aggregates
appearing during the movie are automatically detected and their trajectory within the cell
quantified (internal trajectories). (B) By convention, we referred to the projection of the
aggregate location on the long axis of the cell as the x-component and that along the short
axis as the y-component. (C) Histogram of the x-component of the initial position of the
trajectories (total of 1,644 trajectories). Since the cell length at the start of the trajectory is
highly variable, the x-component was rescaled by division by the cell half-length. After this
normalization, the cell poles are located at locations -1.0 and 1.0 respectively, for every
trajectory. (D) Experimentally measured positions of the aggregates detected in the poles
(both poles pooled, n = 9,242 points). The green-dashed curves in (D-F) locate the 2d
projection of the 3d semi-ellipsoid that was used to approximate the cell pole. (E) Synthetic
data for bulk positions: 10,000 3d positions were drawn uniformly at random in the 3d semiellipsoid pole. The figure shows the corresponding 2d projections. (F) Synthetic data of
membranary positions: 10,000 3d positions were drawn uniformly at random in the external
boundary (membrane) of the 3d semi-ellipsoid pole. The figure shows the corresponding 2d
projections. (G) To quantify figures D-F, the correlation function ρ(s) was computed as the
density of positions located within crescent D(s) (gray). See text for more detail. (H-I) Local
density of aggregate positions ρ(s) in the synthetic (H) and experimental (I) data shown in E
(bulk, blue), F (membranary, red) and D (experimental, orange). The dashed black line
shows the local density computed for 10,000 synthetic 2d positions that were drawn
uniformly at random in the 2d semi-ellipse resulting from the 2d projection of the 3d pole
ellipsoid (green dashed curve in D-F).
Figure 2: Single-aggregate tracking analysis inside E. coli cells.
Coordinates along the x and y-axis are shown in red and black, respectively. Low frequency
sampling trajectories (LF) are displayed using full lines and high frequency ones (HF) using
open symbols. Light red and black swaths indicate + and - 95% confidence intervals for the
x- and y-axis data, respectively (for clarity, - and + intervals for the x- and y-axis data,
respectively, are omitted) (A) Corrected mean displacement <(u(t)-u(0)-uc(t))2> where uc(t) is
the applied correction. For the y-component, the correction is the time-average of the ycoordinate. For the x-component, the applied correction is cell growth : ux=(L(t)-L(0))Δt
where L(t) is the cell half-length at time t and Δt is the time interval between two consecutive
34
images. (B) Corresponding mean squared displacements MSDc = <(u(t)-u(0)-uc(t))2>. The
inset shows a magnification of the HF results and their close-to-linear behavior for the first 10
- 15 seconds (dashed line).
Figure 3: Size-dependence of the diffusion constants.
Trajectories from the LF movies (Figure 2) were clustered into 5 classes of increasing initial
median fluorescence (Table 1) and the corresponding MSD were averaged in each class.
Symbols (open circles) show the MSD for the x- (A) and y-directions (B) for each class.
Curve colors correspond to the classes from Table 1(with median fluorescence increasing
from top to bottom). The corresponding full lines show the results of the fitting procedure for
each class (see text and Material and Methods). Panels (C) and (D) show the corresponding
log-log plots, to explore for possible anomalous diffusion. The straight lines are linear fits
over the initial regimes (first 21 seconds), before movement restriction starts saturating the
MSDs. The slopes of these lines are the anomalous exponents as defined by MSD(t) ~ t^α.
Each pannel indicates the average (+/- s.d.) of the exponents determined for the 4 smallest
aggregates classes (thus excluding the largest class, represented by black circles). The
resulting values of the diffusion constant D are plotted against the radius r in (E), keeping the
same color code as in (A-D). Full circles indicate the values determined from fitting the MSD
in the x-direction, while full squares show the values from the fit in the y-direction. The full
line is a fit to a Stock-Einstein law D(r)=C0/r, yielding C0 = 47.23×103 nm3/s. The inset replots
these data as a function of 1/r.
Figure 4: Individual-based models of chaperone protein diffusion and aggregation
(A) Geometry of the 3D model used in individual-based models for E. coli intracellular space.
Numbers indicate distances in µm. The blue boxes inside the bacteria locate the nucleoids,
where increased molecular crowding is modeled by the insertion of bulk immobile obstacles.
(B) Comparison between simulations and experiments of the localization at first detection of
the protein aggregates along the long axis (x-axis). The full lines show the spatial
distributions extracted from the simulations with different detection thresholds (an aggregate
must contain at least 5, 10, 20 or 50 monomeric proteins, respectively, to be detected). Total
number of proteins in the simulations Np = 100 . The dashed line is an histogram showing the
distribution of the experimental data. (C-E) Time-evolution of the probabilities to observe
exactly 1 (red), 2 (green), 3 (blue) or more than for 4 (brown) distinct aggregates
simultaneously in the simulations. The simulations emulated non-stressed conditions (C),
with Np=100 total proteins and aggregate detection threshold = 30 or heat-shock triggered
aggregation, with Np=7,000 total proteins and aggregate detection threshold = 30 (D) or 1750
(E).
35
Supplementary Figure Legends
Figure S1: Mean displacements of single-aggregates.
The figure shows the time evolution of the mean displacement,
u (t ) − u ( 0 ) , where
u = x or y (brackets denote averaging over the trajectories). Coordinates along the x and yaxis are shown in red and black, respectively. Low frequency sampling trajectories (LF) are
displayed using full lines and high frequency ones (HF) using open symbols. The inset
schematizes the increase of the cell half-length during growth that dominates the movement
along the x-axis.
Figure S2: Diffusion measurements clustered by cell length.
Trajectories from the LF movies (Figure 2) were clustered into 4 classes corresponding to the
cell size at the time of measurement: L ≤ 3.4 µm (light blue), 3.4 µm < L ≤ 4.0 µm (red), 4.0
µm < L ≤ 4.8 µm (lilac) or L ≥ 4.8 µm (green). The corresponding MSD were averaged in
each class for the x- (A) and y-directions (B).
Figure S3: Simulation of aggregate formation dynamics and location for protein
initializations in or around the nucleoids.
The positions of the proteins monomers were initialized (uniformly) at random inside the
nucleoids (A-B) or around (i.e. within a layer of 20 nm) around them (C-D). For each
initialization type, the graph shows the distribution of the localization at first detection of the
protein aggregates along the long axis (x-axis) (A,C) and the time-evolution of the
probabilities to observe exactly 1 (red), 2 (green), 3 (blue) or more than for 4 (brown) distinct
aggregates simultaneously in the simulations (B,D). In A and C, the different curves
correspond to different detection thresholds. For both initial locations inside the nucleoids
(A,B), the simulations corresponded to non-stressed conditions (100 proteins, detection
threshold = 30) and aggregation probability pag=1.
Figure S4: Aggregate formation in ageing wild type E. coli cells.
E. coli wild-type K12 MG1655 cells were inoculated into the microfluidics "mother machine"
device (see Wang et al. 2010, Curr Biol 20(12):1099-103) and grown at 37°C in LB media.
Briefly, the dead-end part of channels maintains the old pole cell (top of images, white
arrows); at the opposite side the channels are open to flow that washes away the progeny.
Cells were followed by time-lapse phase contrast microscopy for 32 hours. As can be seen,
protein aggregates (yellow arrowheads) are formed within the old-pole of the ageing cells.
36
TABLES
37
Table 1. Comparison of the estimated radius and diffusion constants of
protein aggregates depending on their initial median fluorescence. Data
are averages of the fits on the MSDx- and MSDy-data and +/- values
locate min-max.
38
Intensity classes
# aggregates
r (nm)
D (nm2/s)
I < 1459
128
54 ± 2
837 ± 38
1459 < I < 2015
115
105 ± 11
550 ± 2
2015 < I < 2905
128
141 ± 33
437 ± 26
2905 < I < 4727
129
174 ± 10
261 ± 4
I > 4727
128
273 ± 12
92 ± 26
B
A
pole
pole
y-axis
x-axis
-1.0
# aggregation foci
C
1.0
50
40
30
20
10
0
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
relative location along x-axis
-1
0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
x- position (relative)
ay
say
D(s)
ds
ax
aggregate density ρ(s)
H
G
0
-1
0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
x- position (relative)
I
0.20
Synthetic data :
0.15
0.10
F
Bulk
Uniform 2D
Mmbry 3D
Bulk 3D
0.05
0.00
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
length scale s
Membranary
y - position (relative)
0
1
aggregate density ρ(s)
y - position (relative)
1
y - position (relative)
E
D Experimental
1
0
-1
0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
x- position (relative)
4
6x10
Experimental data
4
4x10
4
2x10
4
0x10
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
length scale s
Corrected mean
displacement (μm)
along x-axis
0.10
along y-axis
A
0.05
0.00
0.05
B
MSD (μm 2 )
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0
50
100
150
time (s)
0
10
200
20
250
30
300
A
B
0.06
MSDy (µm2)
MSDx (µm2)
0.06
0.04
0.02
0.00
0
40
80
α = 0.83+/-0.08
MSDy (µm2)
MSDx (µm2)
-2.0
10
-2.5
10
-3.0
α = 1.04+/-0.14
10
-2.0
10
-2.5
10
10
0.5
10
Diffusion Constant D (nm 2 /s)
time (s)
120
-3.0
10
1.0
10
1.5
2.0
10
0.5
10
time (s)
10
800
1000
D 400
0
0.00
600
0.01
1/ r
0.02
200
0
80
-1.5
10
0
40
-1.0
10
-1.5
E
0
D
-1.0
10
0.02
0.00
120
time (s)
C
0.04
100
200
radius r (nm)
300
1.0
10
1.5
10
time (s)
2.0
10
A
4.0
1.0
0.54
1.12
0.68
z
x
50
0.12
40
0.08
30
20
0.04
10
0
0.00
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
# aggregates (exper.)
0.12
B
Probability 1st appear.
Simulations
y
0.76
1.0
1.0
Relative axial position
Probability
C
Probability
D
Probability
E
Non-stressed conditions
Probability
to detect:
1 aggregate
2 aggregates
3 aggregates
> 4 aggregates
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
Heat Shock - low detection threshold
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
Heat Shock - high detection threshold
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0x105
5x105
10x105
15x105
simulation time (a.u.)
20x10 5
Mean displacement (μm)
along x-axis
along y-axis
0.30
0.25
0.20
L(t)
0.15
≈ dL(t)/dt
0.10
0.05
0.00
0
50
100
150
time (s)
200
250
300
B
0.03
0.04
MSDy (µm2)
MSDx (µm2)
A
0.02
0.01
0.00
0
40
80
120
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.00
0
40
80
time (s)
time (s)
Cell length L (µm):
L > 4.8
4.0 < L< 4.8
3.4 < L < 4.0
L < 3.4
120
Probability 1st appear.
Simulations
A
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
-1.0
Probability
0.5
1.0
Probability
to detect:
1 aggregate
2 aggregates
3 aggregates
> 4 aggregates
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0x105
5x105
10x105
15x105
20x10 5
simulation time (a.u.)
C
Probability 1st appear.
Simulations
0.0
Relative axial position
B
0.12
0.08
0.04
0.00
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
Relative axial position
D
Probability
-0.5
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
0x105
5x105
10x105
15x105
simulation time (a.u.)
20x10 5
| 5cs.CE
|
On
the
average
uncertainty
for
systems
with
nonlinear
coupling
Kenric
P.
Nelson 1, 2,
Sabir
R.
Umarov 3,
and
Mark
A.
Kon 1
Abstract
The
increased
uncertainty
and
complexity
of
nonlinear
systems
have
motivated
investigators
to
consider
generalized
approaches
to
defining
an
entropy
function.
New
insights
are
achieved
by
defining
the
average
uncertainty
in
the
probability
domain
as
a
transformation
of
entropy
functions.
The
Shannon
entropy
when
transformed
to
the
probability
domain
is
the
weighted
geometric
mean
of
the
probabilities.
For
the
exponential
and
Gaussian
distributions,
we
show
that
the
weighted
geometric
mean
of
the
distribution
is
equal
to
the
density
of
the
distribution
at
the
location
plus
the
scale
(i.e.
at
the
width
of
the
distribution).
The
average
uncertainty
is
generalized
via
the
weighted
generalized
mean,
in
which
the
moment
is
a
function
of
the
nonlinear
source.
Both
the
Rényi
and
Tsallis
entropies
transform
to
this
definition
of
the
generalized
average
uncertainty
in
the
probability
domain.
For
the
generalized
Pareto
and
Student’s
t-‐distributions,
which
are
the
maximum
entropy
distributions
for
these
generalized
entropies,
the
appropriate
weighted
generalized
mean
also
equals
the
density
of
the
distribution
at
the
location
plus
scale.
A
coupled
entropy
function
is
proposed,
closely
related
to
the
normalized
Tsallis
entropy,
but
incorporating
a
distinction
between
the
additive
coupling
and
multiplicative
coupling.
Keywords:
complex
systems,
nonlinear
coupling,
non-‐additive
entropy,
nonextensive
statistical
mechanics
1 Introduction
Entropy
is
the
standard-‐bearer
for
defining
the
average
uncertainty
of
a
probability
distribution
or
density
function
[1–3].
Boltzmann,
Gibbs,
and
Shannon
(BGS)
demonstrated
that
the
kernel − ln p
is
necessary
to
form
a
weighted
arithmetic
average
of
the
uncertainty
of
a
probability
distribution.
Khinchin
showed
that
the
N
entropy
function H = −∑ pi ln pi is
unique
given
the
axioms
that
it
is
i =1
a)
continuous
in
pi,
b)
maximized
at
the
uniform
distribution,
c)
not
changed
by
a
state
with
zero
probability,
and
d)
additive
for
conditionally
independent
probabilities.
Correspondence:
Kenric
Nelson,
[email protected],
781-‐645-‐8564
1
Boston
University,
Boston,
MA
2
Raytheon
Company,
Woburn,
MA
3
University
of
New
Haven,
New
Haven,
CT
Rényi
,
Tsallis
and
Amari
[4–6]
sought
to
broaden
the
definition
of
average
uncertainty
to
account
for
the
influence
of
nonlinear
dynamics
in
complex
systems.
Generalized
entropy
measures
have
been
applied
to
a
variety
of
nonlinear
systems
such
as
decision
making
under
risk
[7,8],
communication
channel
equalization
[9],
compressive
sensing
[10],
the
edge
of
chaos
[11],
space
plasma
[12,13],
high
energy
physics
[14,15]
and
quantum
entanglement
[16].
Hanel
and
Thurner
[17,18]
have
shown
that
requiring
just
the
first
three
of
Khinchin’s
axioms
leads
to
a
two-‐
parameter
generalization
of
entropy,
one
of
which
is
the
Tsallis
generalization
and
the
focus
of
this
communication.
The
objective
of
the
paper
is
to
show
the
generalized
average
uncertainty
for
a
nonlinear
system
can
be
defined
in
the
probability
domain
as
the
weighted
generalized
mean.
This
is
derived
as
a
transformation
of
the
generalized
entropy
functions.
New
evidence
for
the
importance
of
generalizing
the
average
uncertainty
is
provided.
For
the
distributions
that
minimize
the
weighted
generalized
mean
(maximum
generalized
entropy)
constrained
by
a
location
and
scale,
the
density
at
the
location
plus
the
scale
is
the
generalized
average
uncertainty.
A
review
of
the
average
uncertainty
for
important
members
of
the
exponential
family
provides
a
helpful
framework
prior
to
introduction
of
the
effects
of
nonlinearity.
The
Boltzmann-‐Gibbs-‐Shannon
entropy
transformed
to
the
probability
domain,
is
the
weighted
geometric
mean
of
the
distribution,
that
is
⎛ N
⎞ N
(1)
Pavg ≡ exp ⎜ +∑ pi ln pi ⎟ = ∏ pipi ,
⎝ i =1
⎠ i =1
where
the
weights,
now
as
powers,
are
also
probabilities.
The
average
uncertainty
Pavg
is
the
average
probability
of
being
able
to
determine
the
state
of
the
system.
The
average
uncertainty
ranges
from
certainty
(Pavg
=1)
when
one
of
the
states
is
certain,
to
(Pavg
=1/N)
when
all
states
are
equiprobable.
The
intuition
is
that
the
total
probability
of
the
distribution
is
the
product
of
the
probabilities
and
the
average
is
determined
by
weighting
each
term
by
the
probability.
Assuming
a
continuous
distribution,
the
average
density
for
the
exponential
distribution
is
then
⎛ ∞ −( x− µ ) ⎛ −( x− µ ) ⎞ ⎞
⎛ −( x− µ ) ⎞
1
1
1
σ
f avg ⎜ σ e
⎟ = exp ⎜ ∫µ σ e σ ln ⎜ σ e σ ⎟ dx ⎟
⎜
⎝
⎠
⎝
⎠ ⎟⎠
⎝
(2)
1
=
σe
!
and
for
the
Gaussian
distribution
the
average
density
is
2
2
2
−1⎛ x − µ ⎞ ⎞
−1⎛ x − µ ⎞
−1⎛ x −µ ⎞ ⎞
⎛ ∞
⎞
⎛
⎛
⎜
⎟
⎜
⎟
⎜
⎟
2⎝ σ ⎠ ⎟
2⎝ σ ⎠
2⎝ σ ⎠ ⎟
1
1
1
⎜
⎜
⎜
favg 2πσ e
= exp ∫ 2πσ e
ln 2πσ e
dx ⎟
⎜ −∞
⎜
⎟
⎜
⎟ ⎟
⎝
⎠
⎝
⎠ ⎠
(3)
⎝
1
=
.
2π eσ
In
both
cases
the
average
density
is
equal
to f ( µ + σ ) .
Rényi
showed
that
information
theory
could
be
broadened
by
considering
the
weighted
generalized
mean
of
probabilities
[19]
as
the
kernel
prior
to
applying
2
the
logarithm
function.
Through
consideration
of
the
statistics
of
a
weighted
distribution
piq ,
Tsallis
showed
that
use
of
both
the
weighted
generalized
mean
and
a
generalization
of
the
logarithm
function
provided
a
model
of
non-‐additive
entropy.
Because
of
its
role
in
raising
probabilities
to
a
power,
the
parameter
q
can
be
interpreted
as
the
number
of
independent
random
variables
whose
combined
distribution
provides
a
basis
for
determining
generalized
statistical
properties.
This
analysis,
broadly
referred
to
as
nonextensive
statistical
mechanics
[20],
has
been
shown
to
model
a
wide
variety
of
complex
systems.
Section
2
introduces
the
concept
of
nonlinear
statistical
coupling
which
is
an
interpretation
of
nonextensive
statistical
mechanics
focused
on
the
role
of
nonlinearity
in
deforming
statistical
analysis.
From
examination
of
multivariate
distributions,
it
was
shown
that
the
coupling
parameter
κ is
related
to
q
via
the
ακ
.
influence
of
the
dimensions
d
and
power α of
the
state
variable
by
q = 1+
1+ dκ
!
Other
approaches
have
been
taken
to
parameterizing
the
Tsallis
statistics,
including
κ ' = 1− q ,
which
was
originally
proposed
as
a
definition
of
nonlinear
statistical
1
1− q
which
is
the
translation
to
the
kappa-‐distribution
used
in
space
physics
[12].
There
are
also
generalizations
of
entropy,
which
use
the
kappa
symbol,
such
as
the
work
by
Kaniadakis[24].
In
Section
3,
the
main
objective
relating
average
uncertainty
and
the
width
of
coupled
exponential
distributions
is
established.
In
Section
4
we
show
that
the
generalized
entropies
of
Renyi
and
Tsallis
along
with
a
modified
normalization
of
the
Tsallis
entropy
denoted
as
the
coupled
entropy,
can
each
be
expressed
as
the
weighted
generalized
mean
of
the
distribution
and
a
transformation
to
the
entropy
scale
using
a
generalized
logarithm
function.
coupling
[21]
and
has
been
utilized
by
other
investigators
[22,23];
and κ '' =
2 Nonlinear
Statistical
Coupling
Fundamental
to
complex
systems
is
the
influence
of
nonlinearity
on
dynamics
[25,26].
As
such
in
modeling
the
statistical
mechanics
of
a
complex
system,
we
choose
the
source
of
nonlinearity
to
define
the
nonlinear
statistical
coupling
(NSC)
κ
[21].
NSC
has
two
contexts,
external
coupling
between
random
variables
and
internal
coupling
between
the
states
of
a
random
variable
[27].
The
role
of
the
coupled
product
function
in
modeling
external
coupling
was
developed
in
[28],
building
upon
the
q-‐algebra
of
nonextensive
statistical
mechanics
[29].
In
this
paper,
the
focus
is
on
internal
coupling.
The
probability
average
translated
from
BGS
entropy
in
(1)
treats
the
probability
of
each
state
as
independent,
thus
multiplying
the
probabilities
of
the
distribution.
The
dependence
due
to
the
probabilities
summing
to
one
is
incorporated
via
the
power
term.
The
generalized
average
uncertainty
introduced
in
Section
3
will
make
use
of
the
coupled
product
as
3
a
model
of
dependency
between
the
states.
First
we
introduce
the
basic
relationships
of
nonlinear
statistical
coupling.
Positive
coupling
(0 < κ < ∞ )
is
the
domain
of
heavy-‐tail
statistics
in
which
the
nonlinearity
causes
increased
variation.
Examples
include
multiplicative
noise
[30],
superstatistics
in
which
the
variance
fluctuates
[31,32],
and
the
inverse
of
the
degree
of
freedom
[33–35].
Negative
coupling
( −1 < κ < 0)
is
the
domain
of
compact-‐support
statistics
in
which
the
nonlinearity
causes
reduction
in
variation.
The
two
domains
are
related
by
a
conjugate
dual
1−+κκ .
Linear
systems
(κ = 0)
are
the
domain
of
exponential
statistics
and
logarithmic
measures
of
information.
The
fluctuation
of
the
variance,
studied
as
superstatistics
[31,32],
is
a
helpful
example.
For
a
system
governed
by
an
exponential
distribution,
1 −σx '
e ,!!x ≥ 0,
(4)
!σ '
but
with
the
inverse
scale
β ' = 1
fluctuating
according
to
a
gamma
distribution
σ'
!
the
modified
statistics
are
governed
by
a
deformed
exponential
distribution,
which
we
will
call
a
coupled-‐exponential.
The
scale
and
shape
of
the
coupled
exponential
are
defined
by
the
mean
and
relative
variance
of
the
inverse
scale
σ = β'
κ=
−1
,
2
β '2 − β '
β'
.
2
(5)
!
For
this
mean
and
relative
variance,
the
gamma
distribution
is
( ) Γ ( )( ) ( )
f β' =
1
κ
σ
1
σ
1
−1
β' κ e
−
σβ '
κ
,
(6)
!
and
the
coupled
exponential
distribution
is
∞
⎛1 ⎞
−⎜ +1⎟
1
(7)
1+ κ x ⎝ κ ⎠ = ∫ f β ' β 'e − β 'x d β ' .
σ
0
!
The
coupled
exponential
function
is
notated
as
an
analog
of
the
exponential
function
(
( )(
)
() (
1
+1
κ
+
)
)
()
( )
(8)
exp x ≡ 1+ κ x
,!! a ≡ max 0,a .
+
! κ
The
inverse
of
the
exponent
is
a
modified
coupling,
which
will
be
referred
to
as
the
multiplicative
coupling.
For
d
dimensions
[28,36]
the
exponent
generalizes
to
κ −1 ≡ 1 + d ,
but
only
the
one-‐dimensional
function
will
be
used
in
this
paper.
κ d will
! d κ
!
be
used
to
modify
the
product
function.
The
inverse
of
the
multiplicative
coupling
is
(
)
−κ d−1
( )
−κ −1
equal
to
the
asymptotic
fractal
dimension
lim 1+ κ x
= O x d
of
the
coupled
!x→∞
exponential
distribution
(7);
thus
the
inverse
of
the
coupling
terms
are
summarized
by
4
κ −1 = ν !!!Degree!of!Freedom,
κ d−1 = D!!!Asymptotic!Fractal!Dimension.
!
Raising
to
a
power
is
not
identical
to
multiplying
the
argument,
so
an
additional
parameter
definition
is
required
to
show
the
relationships.
In
anticipation
of
its
use
with
distributions,
the
power
used
is
1α
1/α
κ
exp
1⎛ 1 ⎞
+1
α ⎜⎝ κ ⎟⎠
+
( x ) ≡ (1+κ x )
( x ) ≡ (1+ ακ x )
,
1⎛ 1 ⎞
+1
α ⎜⎝ κ ⎟⎠
+
(9)
(10)
exp
.
! α ,κ
These
notational
definitions
are
needed
to
clarify
that
raising
to
a
power
is
equivalent
to
both
multiplying
the
argument
and
dividing
the
nonlinear
coupling
terms
exp1/α x = expα ,κ x / α .
(11)
! κ
The
nonlinear
statistical
coupling
has
the
effect
of
changing
the
relationship
between
variables
in
the
state
space.
Multiplication
of
independent
coupled
exponential
distributions
results
in
a
combined
variable
of
()
(
(
) (
)(
(
)
))
1+ κ x 1+ κ y = 1+ κ x + y + κ xy .
!
The
nonlinear
term
is
viewed
as
forming
the
coupled
addition
[21,29]
x ⊕ y = x + y + κ xy ,
! κ
which
via
the
coupled
subtraction
is
seen
as
a
dilation
of
the
state
space
x− y
.
x ⊖κ y ≡
1+ κ y
!
The
inverse
of
the
coupled
exponential
for
the
domain
1+ κ x > 0
is
the
coupled
logarithm
⎞
1⎛ κ
lnκ x ≡ ⎜ x 1+κ −1⎟ ,!x > 0 .
κ⎝
⎠
!
Importantly,
the
integral
over
the
unit
interval
is
invariant
to
the
deformation
()
1
∫ ln
κ
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
( x )dx = 1 .
This
insures
that
the
coupled
logarithm
deforms
the
measure
of
−1
!0
information
without
modifying
the
“total
information”
over
the
unit
interval.
Incorporating,
the
power
α
the
definition
is
ακ
⎞
1
1 ⎛ 1+
κ
(16)
lnα ,κ x ≡ lnκ x α ≡
x
−1⎟ ,!x > 0
⎜
α
ακ ⎝
⎠
!
The
role
of
the
coupled
addition
in
modifying
the
state
space
can
now
be
expressed
in
terms
of
the
coupled
exponential
and
logarithm
functions
()
( )
5
⎛ N
⎞ N
exp
x
=
exp
x
∏
κ
i
⎜⎝ ∑ ⊕κ i ⎟⎠ ,!! ∑ ⊕κ x i ≡ x1 ⊕κ ....⊕κ x N ,
i=1
i=1
i=1
( )
N
(17)
⎛ N ⎞ N
lnκ ⎜ ∏ x i ⎟ = ∑ ⊕ lnκ x i .
κ
! ⎝ i=1 ⎠ i=1
The
coupled
product
has
a
complimentary
role,
but
operates
on
the
exponent
of
the
variable.
Thus
not
only
do
the
coupled
sum
and
product
not
form
an
algebra
with
a
distribution
property
[29],
but
are
more
accurately
two
complementary
algebras
[22,37].
The
coupled
product
of
positive-‐valued
variables
! f > 0!and!g > 0
is
(
κ1
κ
)
1
κ1
,
where
the
multiplicative
coupling
κ 1 = 1+κκ
is
the
inverse
of
!
+
!
the
exponent
of
the
coupled
exponential
function.
This
definition
extends
to
multiple
variables
and
has
the
following
properties
f ⊗κ g ≡ f
1
+ g 1 −1
κ
⎛ N
⎞
1+κ
exp
x
≡
exp
x i − N −1 ⎟
∏
⎜∑
⊗κ
κ
i
κ
⎝ i=1
⎠
i=1 1+κ
( )
N
( ) (
)
1+κ
κ
⎛ N ⎞
= expκ ⎜ ∑ x i ⎟ ,!for!expκ x i > 0
⎝ i=1 ⎠
( )
(18)
⎛ N
⎞ N
lnκ ⎜ ∏ ⊗ x i ⎟ = ∑ lnκ x i ,!for!x i > 0.
⎝ i=1 1+κκ ⎠ i=1
!
In
[28]
the
formation
of
multivariate
coupled
exponentials
required
the
coupled
product
to
be
defined
such
that
the
output
dimension
was
the
sum
of
the
input
dimensions.
This
paper
is
focused
on
the
coupling
between
states
for
a
single
random
variable
and
as
such
the
dimension
does
not
change.
The
coupled
power
will
also
be
needed,
x
!
⊗κa
1
(
κ1
(
≡ ax − a −1
))
1
κ1
+
,!x > 0.
(19)
⎛ −x α ⎞
Generalization
of
the
stretched
exponential
distributions
f x ∝exp ⎜
α ⎟
⎝ ασ ⎠
!
utilizes
the
two-‐parameter
definitions
from
Equation
(10).
Thus
the
coupled
stretched
exponential
is
expressed
as
()
1+κ
⎛ xα ⎞
⎛ −x α ⎞ ⎛
x α ⎞ −ακ
(20)
expκ α ⎜ α ⎟ = exp−α ,κ ⎜
=
1+
κ
.
⎜
α ⎟
σ α ⎟⎠ +
⎝σ ⎠
⎝ ασ ⎠ ⎝
!
The
coupled
exponential (α = 1) and
coupled
Gaussian (α = 2) distributions
are
of
−1
particular
interest
given
their
role
as
maximum
generalized
entropy
distributions
6
with
constraints
on
the
scale
of
the
distribution.
These
distributions
[38]
are
defined
as
α
−1 ⎛ ⎛ x − µ ⎞ ⎞
1
α
(21)
!
expκ ⎜ ⎜
⎟ ,!κ ≥ −1.
⎜⎝ ⎝ σ ⎟⎠ ⎟⎠
Z κ ,σ ,α
!
For
κ ≥ 0
and
α = 1
the
domain
of
the
random
variable
is
x ≥ µ
and
Z (κ ,σ ,α ) = σ .
(
)
For
κ ≥ 0
and!α = 2,! − ∞ < x < ∞
and
Z (κ ,σ ,α ) =
κ ( 12+κκ )!
πσ (1 + κ ) ( 21κ )!
,
where
x ! ≡ Γ ( x + 1)
is
Euler’s
gamma
function.
The
parameters
of
the
distributions
are
the
location
μ,
the
scale
σ,
and
the
normalization
Z.
One
of
the
benefits
of
this
approach
to
the
definition
is
that
the
source
of
coupling
κ
corresponds
exactly
to
the
shape
parameter
for
the
generalized
Pareto
distribution
and
the
inverse
of
the
degree
of
freedom
for
the
Student’s
t-‐distribution.
For
the
compact-‐support
domain,
the
degree
of
freedom
is
negative
and
less
than
-‐1.
Definition
1
Coupled
Probability/Density
Given
a
discrete
probability
distribution
p = pi ,!i = 1,...,N
the
following
distribution
is
called
the
coupled
!
probability
distribution
{
}
α ,κ
Pi( ) =
1+
pi
N
∑p
j=1
ακ
1+κ
1+
j
ακ
1+κ
=
ακ
N
∏ p1+j κ
pi
j=1
j≠i
N ⎛
∑ ⎜⎜ pi
i=1
⎝
N
∏p
j=1
ακ
1+κ
j
⎞
⎟
⎟
⎠
.
(22)
j≠i
!
Similarly,
for
a
given
continuous
density
f ( x )
the
coupled
density
function
is
defined
by
()
α ,κ
f( ) x ≡
f
∞
∫f
1+
1+
ακ
1+κ
ακ
1+κ
( x ) .
( x )dx
(23)
−∞
!
The
integral
in
(23)
is
assumed
finite.
The
expression
on
the
right
of
Equation
(22)
is
shown
to
make
evident
the
modeling
of
a
coupled
state
of
the
system.
The
Cauchy
ακ
distribution
α = 2,!κ = 1
is
an
illustrative
example.
In
this
case
!1+
= 1
and
the
κ
!
coupled-‐probability
is
formed
by
dividing
the
probability
pi
of
state
i
by
the
product
of
all
the
probabilities
of
all
the
other
states
and
then
renormalizing
them.
This
procedure
has
a
direct
connection
with
the
origin
of
the
Cauchy
distribution
as
the
division
of
two
random
variables.
(
)
7
An
important
result
of
nonextensive
statistical
mechanics
is
the
relationship
between
coupled-‐moments
and
the
parameters
of
the
coupled-‐exponential
and
coupled-‐Gaussian
distributions
[21,39].
Using
the
coupled
algebra
the
generalization
of
the
nth-‐moment
takes
the
form
N
x in
N
κ
n,κ
≡ ∑ x inPi( ) =
i=1
∑ xinpi
i=1
N
1+n
∑p
!
i=1
1+n
i
κ
1+κ
κ
1+κ
.
(24)
The
α
parameter
is
not
required
because
it
drops
out
from
the
expression
n ακ
.
!α 1+ κ
Lemma
1
Given
either
the
coupled-‐exponential
or
the
coupled-‐Gaussian
distribution,
the
generalized
scale
parameter
σ
is
determined
by
the
generalizations
of
the
1st
and
2nd
moments,
respectively:
⎛1
⎛ x ⎞⎞
= ∫ x ⎜ expκ−1 ⎜ ⎟ ⎟
σ
⎝σ ⎠⎠
−∞ ⎝
∞
x
!
κ
1+2κ
1+κ
⎛1
⎞
−1 ⎛ x ⎞
∫−∞ ⎜⎝ σ expκ ⎜⎝ σ ⎟⎠ ⎟⎠
∞
dx
1+3κ
1+2κ
1+κ
∞
−1 ⎛ x 2 ⎞ ⎞ 1+κ
−1 ⎛ x 2 ⎞ ⎞
⎛
⎛1
2
2 1
2
2
x = ∫ x ⎜ expκ ⎜ 2 ⎟ ⎟
dx
⎜ Z expκ ⎜ 2 ⎟ ⎟
∫
κ
Z
σ
⎝
⎠
⎝σ ⎠⎠
⎝
⎠
−∞
−∞ ⎝
!
See
[39]
for
the
proof
and
[21]
for
the
notation.
∞
dx = σ ,
1+3κ
1+κ
dx = σ 2 .
(25)
(26)
3 The
Coupled
Average
Uncertainty
The
coupled
algebra
provides
a
foundation
for
defining
a
generalization
of
the
average
uncertainty
given
coupling
of
statistical
states
which
is
equal
to
the
weighted
generalized
mean
(or
weighted
p-‐norm)
[22,27,40].
Equation
(1)
is
generalized
using
the
coupled
exponential
and
coupled
logarithm
functions.
Definition
2
Coupled
Log
Average
Given
a
set
of
weights
{wi ,
i = 1,..N } such
that
N
∑w
i =1
i
= 1
and
a
set
of
variables
{ xi ,
i = 1,..N } ,
the
coupled-‐log
average
of
the
variables
is
−1 ⎧ N
⎫
expκ α ⎨∑ wi lnκ x i−α ⎬.
⎩ i=1
⎭
!
Lemma
2
The
coupled-‐log
average
(
)
a)
can
be
expressed
equivalently
using
the
coupled
product,
and
b)
is
equal
to
the
weighted
generalized
mean
(or
weighted
p-‐norm).
8
(27)
Proof
a)
We
have
wi
⊗ − ακ
⎧N
⎫ N
−α
α
expκ ⎨∑ wi lnκ x i ⎬ = ∏ ⊗ x i 1+κ ,
− ακ
⎩ i=1
⎭ i=1 1+κ
!
where
we
used
the
properties
in
Equations
(18)
and
(19).
b)
We
have
−1 ⎧ N
⎫
expκ α ⎨∑ wi lnκ x i−α ⎬
⎩ i=1
⎭
(
−1
)
(
)
⎛
⎛ w ⎛
= ⎜ 1+ κ ⎜ ∑ i ⎜ x
⎝ i=1 κ ⎝
⎝
N
⎛
= ⎜ ∑ wi x
⎝
! i=1
N
− ακ
1+κ
i
⎞
⎟
⎠
(28)
− ακ
1+κ
i
⎞⎞⎞
−1⎟ ⎟ ⎟
⎠⎠⎠
1+κ
− ακ
(29)
1+κ
− ακ
.
ακ
Given
the
central
role
of
the
parameter
m =
for
the
weighted
generalized
mean,
1+ κ
!
the
coupled
log
average
is
summarized
as
−1
⎧N
⎫ ⎛ N
⎞m
ακ
.
expκ α ⎨∑ wi lnκ x i−α ⎬ = ⎜ ∑ wi x i−m ⎟ ,!m =
1+ κ
⎝
⎠
i=1
i=1
⎩
⎭
!
The
coupled-‐log
average
extends
to
continuous
variables
by
the
relationship
−1
(
)
(30)
−1
⎧∞
⎫⎪ ⎛ ∞
⎞m
−α
−m
α ⎪
expκ ⎨ ∫ w x lnκ f
x dx ⎬ = ⎜ ∫ w x f
x dx ⎟ .
(31)
⎝ −∞
⎠
⎪
⎪
−∞
⎩
⎭
!
Using
the
coupled
probability
as
the
weight
of
the
generalized
mean
we
can
now
define
the
average
uncertainty
of
a
distribution
that
originates
from
a
system
with
nonlinear
coupling.
Definition
3
Coupled
Average
Uncertainty
Given
a
distribution
p = pi ,!i = 1,...,N
!
its
coupled
average
uncertainty
is
defined
by
the
coupled
log
average
with
x i = pi
!
α ,κ )
(
and
wi = Pi
!
−1
()
()
() ()
{
}
1+κ
⎛ N (α ,κ ) −1+ακκ ⎞ −ακ
Pκ avg ≡ ⎜ ∑ Pi pi ⎟ .
⎝ i=1
⎠
!
9
(32)
Furthermore,
the
coupled
average
uncertainty
simplifies
to
the
weighted
generalized
mean
with
the
distribution
as
the
weight;
thus
−1
⎛ N 1+m −m ⎞ m
1
⎜ ∑ pi pi ⎟
N
m
⎛
⎞
ακ
⎟ = ⎜ ∑ pi1+m ⎟ ,!m =
(33)
Pκ avg ≡ ⎜ i=1 N
,
1+ κ
⎝ i=1
⎠
⎜
⎟
1+m
⎜⎝ ∑ p j
⎟⎠
j=1
!
and
for
a
continuous
distribution
⎧ ∞ 1+ ακ
⎫
1
f 1+κ x lnκ f −α x dx ⎪
⎪
∞
∫
m
⎛
⎞
−1 ⎪
⎪
1+m
(34)
fκ avg = expκ α ⎨ −∞
x dx ⎟ .
⎬=⎜ ∫ f
∞
ακ
1+
⎝
⎠
⎪
⎪ −∞
∫−∞ f 1+κ x dx
⎪
⎪
⎩
⎭
!
Applying
the
coupled
average
uncertainty
to
the
coupled
exponential
and
coupled
Gaussian
distributions,
shown
in
Figure
1,
produces
the
main
result
regarding
its
relationship
with
the
location
and
scale
of
the
distribution.
()
()
()
()
Theorem
1
The
coupled
average
fκ avg
of
either
the
coupled
exponential
distribution
or
the
coupled
Gaussian
distribution
with
a
weight
defined
by
the
coupled
probability
is
equal
to
the
density
of
the
distribution
evaluated
at
x = µ + σ .
Proof:
Without
loss
of
generality
we
set
!µ = 0.
For
the
coupled
exponential
distribution,
which
corresponds
to
!α = 1
in
Equation
(21),
that
is
⎛ x⎞
1
f x = expκ−1 ⎜ ⎟ ,
the
coupled
average
uncertainty
is
σ
⎝σ ⎠
!
()
1
⎛∞
⎞m
fκ avg = ⎜ ∫ f 1+m x dx ⎟ !
⎝0
⎠
()
1+2κ
⎛
⎞
1+2κ ∞
−κ
⎛
⎞
x
= σ κ ⎜ ∫ ⎜ 1+ κ ⎟
dx ⎟
⎜ 0⎝
⎟
σ⎠
⎝
⎠
=σ
!
=
1+2κ
κ
(
⎛ 1+ κ
⎝
)
() (
−1
σ⎞
⎠
1+κ
κ
)
1 −1
e 1 = f µ +σ .
σ κ
10
1+κ
κ
(35)
Similarly,
for
the
coupled
Gaussian
distribution,
which
corresponds
to
!α = 2
in
⎛ x2 ⎞
1
expκ−1/2 ⎜ 2 ⎟ ,
the
coupled
average
uncertainty
Equation
(21),
that
is
f x =
Z κ ,σ ,2
⎝σ ⎠
!
is
() (
)
1
⎛∞
⎞m
fκ avg = ⎜ ∫ f 1+m x dx ⎟ !
⎝ −∞
⎠
()
( ) ⎞⎟
( )( )!⎟⎠
⎛
κ 1+2κκ !
=⎜
⎜⎝ πσ 1+ κ 21κ
1+3κ
2κ
1+3κ
⎛∞
⎞
2
−2κ
⎛
⎞
⎜ 1+ κ x
∫ ⎜⎝ σ 2 ⎟⎠ dx ⎟⎟
⎜ −∞
⎜⎝
⎟⎠
( )
( )
( )( )
( )
⎛
⎞
κ ( )!
⎟ (1+ κ )
=⎜
⎜⎝ πσ (1+ κ )( )! ⎟⎠
1
=
e (1) = f ( µ + σ )
Z (κ ,σ ,2)
⎛
κ 1+2κκ !
=⎜
⎜⎝ πσ 1+ κ 21κ
1+3κ
2κ
⎞
⎟
! ⎟⎠
1+κ
2κ
⎛ πσ 1
2κ
⎜
1+
⎜⎝ κ 2κκ
−
!⎞
⎟
! ⎟⎠
1+κ
2κ
1+κ
2κ
(36)
1+κ
2κ
1
2κ
−1/2
κ
!
Figure
1
The
a)
coupled
exponential
and
b)
coupled
Gaussian
distributions
have
the
property
that
the
coupled
average
uncertainty,
equation
(34),
is
equal
to
the
density
at
the
location
plus
the
scale
f ( µ + σ ) .
Several
examples
of
the
distributions
with
coupling
ranging
from
−2 3
to
2
are
shown.
Theorem
1
has
important
implications
for
defining
the
generalized
average
uncertainty.
For
κ → 0
the
weighted
generalized
mean
is
the
weighted
geometric
mean.
Just
as
the
standard
deviation
is
an
expression
of
the
variation
of
the
random
variable,
the
geometric
mean
of
a
distribution
weighted
by
the
distribution
is
an
11
expression
of
average
uncertainty.
For
the
Gaussian
distribution,
one
can
verify
that
the
weighted
geometric
mean
of
the
distribution
is
equal
to
the
density
evaluated
at
x = µ + σ .
The
average
uncertainty
is
generalized
by
using
the
coupled
probability
distribution
for
the
weight
and
taking
the
−ακ (1+κ ) moment.
And
when
f ( x )
is
a
!
member
of
the
coupled
distributions
f µ + σ = fκ avg .
This
relationship
is
shown
in
!
Figure
2
for
the
heavy-‐tail
domain
of
the
coupled-‐Gaussian
distribution.
The
coupled
average
uncertainty
versus
the
source
of
coupling
parameter
for
the
distribution
is
plotted
over
the
range
0 ≤ κ ≤ 1 ,
which
includes
the
Gaussian
(κ = 0) ,
(
)
the
boundary
with
infinite
variance
(κ = 0.5)
and
the
Cauchy
distribution
(κ = 1) .
,
Four
values
for
the
coupled
average
uncertainty,
called
the
metric
coupling
κ = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 are
shown.
In
each
case
the
maximum
uncertainty
5 5 5 5
1 −1
corresponds
to
eκ 2 (1 ) .
Z
{
}
AverageUncertainty
0.5
Metric Coupling
one fifth
two fifths
three fifths
four fifths
0.4
0.3
g
Z1 eκ−1/2 (1)
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
Coupling of Distribution
0.8
1.0
Figure
2
The
coupled
average
uncertainty
as
a
function
of
the
source
of
coupling
is
shown.
The
x-‐axis
varies
the
coupling
of
a
coupled
Gaussian
distribution
with
σ = 1.
The
four
lines
are
for
metric
coupling
of
{
κ = 1 ,2 , 3 ,4
5
5
5
} ,
which
translates
into
weighted
generalized
mean
with
!1+2κκ .
When
the
metric
coupling
5
equals
the
distribution
coupling
the
average
uncertainty
is
minimized
and
equals
12
1 −12
eκ (1) .
Z
4 The
coupled-‐entropy
function
In
defining
the
coupled
log
average
in
Equation
(27)
the
role
of
the
generalized
entropy
was
implied
but
not
explicitly
expressed.
In
this
section
we
show
that
the
Renyi,
Tsallis,
and
normalized
Tsallis
entropies
can
each
be
interpreted
as
the
weighted
generalized
mean
of
a
distribution
translated
to
an
entropy
scale
by
generalized
logarithms.
Thus
translated
to
the
probability
domain
they
are
each
identical
expressions
of
average
uncertainty.
Use
of
the
coupled
logarithm
leads
to
a
new
definition,
called
the
coupled-‐entropy.
Its
properties
with
respect
to
the
nonlinear
coupling
are
compared
with
the
Renyi
and
Tsallis
generalizations.
In
information
theory,
the
negative
logarithm
of
a
probability
is
referred
to
as
the
surprisal.
From
Equation
(16),
the
coupled
surprisal
(or
generalized
measure
of
information)
is
then
⎞
1
1 ⎛ −1+ακκ
−α
(37)
sα ,κ ≡ −ln −α ,κ x ≡ lnκ x =
x
−1
⎟ ,!for!x > 0
α
ακ ⎜⎝
⎠
!
An
alternative
definition
is
possible
based
on
the
inverse
of
the
coupled
stretched
exponential
(20)
taking x
as
the
argument
! σ
1
⎛ 1 ⎛ −ακ
⎞⎞α
1+κ
lnκ x
≡ −α ln −α ,κ x ≡ ⎜ ⎜ x
−1⎟ ⎟ ,!for!x > 0 .
(38)
⎠⎠
⎝κ ⎝
!
While
not
investigated
here,
the
alternative
definition
is
of
potential
significance
as
an
approach
to
the
two-‐parameter
generalized
entropy
function
proposed
by
Hanel,
et.
al.
[17,18]
and
related
generalizations
investigated
in
[37].
Definition
4:
Coupled
Entropy
Given
a
discrete
probability
distribution
p = pi ,!i = 1,...,N
or
a
continuous
density f x
and
setting
the
Boltzmann
constant
!
!
to
one,
the
coupled
entropy
is
defined
as
1
−α α
(
{
) (
)
1
α
()
}
1+κ
Sα ,κ
!
Sα ,κ
!
N
⎛ N 1+ ακ ⎞ ακ
α ,κ
p ≡ −ln −α ,κ ⎜ ∑ pi 1+κ ⎟ = − ∑ Pi( ) ln −α ,κ pi ,
⎝ i=1
⎠
i=1
()
(39)
1+κ
∞
⎛ ∞ 1+ ακ
⎞ ακ
α ,κ
1+κ
f x ≡ −ln −α ,κ ⎜ ∫ f
x dx ⎟ = − ∫ f ( ) x ln −α ,κ f x dx .
⎝ −∞
⎠
−∞
( ( ))
()
13
()
()
(40)
The
coupled-‐entropy
expands
to
the
following
expression
1+κ
Sα ,κ
ακ
⎛ N 1+1+
⎞ ακ
p = −ln −α ,κ ⎜ ∑ pi κ ⎟
⎝ i=1
⎠
()
1+κ − ακ
⎛ N
⎞
ακ
ακ 1+κ
⎛
⎞
1+
1 ⎜
=
−1⎟
∑ p 1+κ ⎟⎠
⎟
ακ ⎜⎜ ⎜⎝ i=1 i
⎟⎠
⎝
(41)
−1
⎛
⎞
ακ
⎞
1 ⎛ N 1+1+
κ
⎜ ∑p
=
⎟ −1⎟⎟ .
ακ ⎜⎝ ⎜⎝ i=1 i
⎠
⎠
!
For
the
two
principal
cases
of
interest,
namely
for
α = 1
and
α = 2, the
coupled-‐
entropy
becomes
−1
⎛ ⎛ N (1+2κ )
⎞
⎞
1⎜
1+κ )
(
⎜ ∑ pi
⎟ −1⎟ ,
S1,κ p =
⎜
⎟
κ ⎜ ⎜ i=1
⎟⎠
⎟⎠
⎝
⎝
(42)
−1
⎛ ⎛ N (1+3κ )
⎞
⎞
1
(1+κ ) ⎟ −1⎟ .
S2,κ p = ⎜ ⎜ ∑ pi
⎟
2κ ⎜⎜ ⎜ i=1
⎟⎠
⎟⎠
⎝
⎝
!
Both
the
Rényi
and
Tsallis
entropies
can
be
expressed
in
terms
of
the
coupled
average
uncertainty
(32).
To
facilitate
the
comparison
between
the
entropy
ακ
functions
a
substitution
is
made
for
the
Rényi
order
and
Tsallis
index
q → 1+ 1+
.
κ
!
Table
1
summarizes
the
properties
of
the
transformation
from
an
average
uncertainty
to
an
entropy
in
terms
of
the
moment
of
the
average,
and
the
power
and
normalization
associated
with
the
generalized
logarithm,
()
()
1
⎛ N
⎞ Moment
−1
S ( p, Norm, Power, Moment ) =
GM Power − 1 , GM = ⎜ ∑ piMoment+1 ⎟
.
(43)
Norm
⎝ i=1
⎠
(
)
For
the
Rényi
entropy
(R)
the
relationship
with
the
coupled
average
uncertainty
is
evident
given
its
use
of
the
natural
logarithm
1+κ
SαR ,κ
!
⎛ N 1+ ακ ⎞ ακ
= −ln ⎜ ∑ pi 1+κ ⎟ .
⎝ i=1
⎠
14
(44)
Table
1
Comparison
of
Generalized
Entropies
The
generalized
entropy
functions
are
expressed
in
terms
of
three
components,
the
moment
of
the
generalized
mean,
the
power
and
the
normalization
(norm)of
the
generalized
logarithm.
Entropy
Moment
Power
ακ
1+ κ
ακ
1+ κ
ακ
1+ κ
−ακ
1+ κ
ακ
1+ κ
−ακ
1+ κ
ακ
1+ κ
lim
power→0
Coupled
Tsallis
Normalized!
Tsallis
Renyi
Shannon
−ακ
ακ
1+ κ
−ακ
1+ κ
lim
lim
moment→0
Norm.
power→0
lim
norm→0
lim
norm→0
!
The
coupled
entropy
is
most
closely
related
to
the
normalized
Tsallis
entropy
(NT).
Expressed
in
terms
of
the
coupled
surprisal
(37)
the
normalized
Tsallis
entropy
is
seen
to
be
the
coupled
entropy
(39)
multiplied
by
1+ κ
!
(
()
SαNT,κ p ≡
(
− 1+ κ
)
N
∑ pi
1+
i=1
N
ακ
1+κ
ln −α ,κ pi
ακ
1+κ
)
1+κ
⎛ N 1+ ακ ⎞ ακ
= − 1+ κ ln −α ,κ ⎜ ∑ pi 1+κ ⎟ .
⎝ i=1
⎠
(
)
(45)
∑ pi
i=1
!
Using
the
unnormalized
form
of
Equation
(45)
for
the
Tsallis
entropy
definition,
the
lack
of
normalization
is
shown
to
be
equivalent
to
using
the
opposite
sign
of
the
multiplier
for
the
transformation
1+
1+κ
ακ
⎛ N 1+1+
⎞ ακ
T
κ
(46)
Sα ,κ p ≡ − 1+ κ ∑ pi
ln −α ,κ pi = 1+ κ lnα ,κ ⎜ ∑ pi
⎟ .
⎝ i=1
⎠
i=1
!
Derivation
of
the
right-‐hand
expression
is
shown
in
Appendix
A.
The
coupled
entropy
(C),
normalized
Tsallis,
and
Tsallis
entropy
have
then
the
following
relationship
SαNT,κ
SαT ,κ
C
S
=
=
.
(47)
α ,κ
ακ
N
1+
1+ κ
1+κ
1+ κ ∑ pi
i=1
!
Figure
3
and
Figure
4
show
comparisons
of
the
entropy
functions
for
the
coupled
exponential
distribution
and
the
coupled
Gaussian
distribution
respectively.
The
computations
for
the
two
figures
are
summarized
in
Appendix
B.
For
the
coupled
exponential
distribution
(Equation
(21)
with
!α = 1 )
with
the
scale
σ
equal
to
one,
both
the
coupled
and
Tsallis
entropy
are
equal
to
one.
In
this
case,
the
normalized
Tsallis
entropy
is
linear
and
similar
to
the
Shannon
entropy.
As
shown
on
the
right
() (
)
N
1+
ακ
1+κ
(
(
15
)
)
of
Figure
3,
even
as
the
scale
varies
the
coupled
entropy
does
not
vary
significantly
with
the
coupling.
This
is
suggestive
that
the
coupled
entropy
represents
a
stabilization
of
the
entropy
as
a
function
of
the
coupling,
in
contrast
to
the
Shannon
and
Renyi
entropies
which
have
close
to
linear
growth
with
the
coupling.
However,
this
property
does
not
hold
for
the
coupled
Gaussian
distribution
(Equation
(21)
with
!α = 2 )
shown
in
Figure
4.
Instead,
the
coupled
entropy
is
quite
sensitive
to
changes
in
both
the
coupling
and
the
scale.
With
scale
equal
to
one,
the
coupled
entropy
is
similar
to
the
Shannon
entropy,
particularly
when
!0 < κ < 0.5 .
For
!κ > 0.5 ,
the
difference
is
more
evident
as
the
coupled
entropy
is
slightly
super-‐linear
and
the
Shannon
entropy
is
slightly
sub-‐linear.
For
this
case,
the
normalized
Tsallis
entropy
is
close
to
quadratic
with
the
coupling.
The
Renyi
entropy
has
close
to
linear
growth
for
both
distributions,
but
with
a
slope
that
is
less
than
the
Shannon
entropy.
The
sensitivity
of
the
coupled
entropy
with
!α ≠ 1
would
be
reduced
if
Equation
(38)
is
used
for
the
generalized
logarithm,
since
the
root
with
respect
to
α
is
taken.
5 Conclusion
The
nonlinear
statistical
coupling
of
states
is
defined
in
terms
of
a
source
of
nonlinear
coupling
κ
in
the
system.
Positive
coupling
models
non-‐stationary
systems
in
which
the
variance
fluctuates.
The
negative
domain
of
κ,
which
has
decreased
variability,
is
limited
to
( −1,0) ;
and
κ = 0
is
the
linear
domain
with
exponential
distributions.
The
maximum
entropy
distribution
for
these
systems
given
a
constrained
location
and
scale
is
the
coupled-‐exponential
distributions,
defined
in
Equation
(21).
In
addition
to
the
nonlinear
coupling
these
distributions
− xα
depend
on
the
stability
index
of
the
stretched
exponential
!e α .
The
coupled
sum
is
defined
by
the
nonlinear
coupling,
while
the
coupled
product
is
a
function
of
the
−ακ
coupling,
the
stability
index
and
the
dimensions
.
In
this
paper
the
one-‐
!1+ dκ
dimensional
case
d = 1
was
examined.
In
this
paper
the
coupled
average
uncertainty
in
the
probability/density
ακ
space
is
introduced
as
the
weighted
generalized
mean
with
a
power
equal
to
1+
.
! κ
The
expression
is
derived
from
and
is
expressible
in
terms
of
deformation
of
the
coupled
product
(18)
and
the
coupled
power
(19)
functions
N
Pκ avg ≡ ∏ ⊗ pi
ακ 1
i=1
!
(− ακ 1 )
P
⊗Ki
16
1+κ
⎛ N 1+ ακ ⎞ ακ
= ⎜ ∑ pi 1+κ ⎟ .
⎝ i=q
⎠
(48)
3.0
Normalized
Tsallis
Entropy
2.5
-‐-‐
Shannon
−
Coupled
3
Shannon
2.0
2
1.5
Renyi
1.0
1
Coupled
and
Tsallis
0.5
0.0
0.0
0
0.5
1.0
1.5
0.5
2.0
Coupling
1.0
1.5
2.0
Coupling
Figure
3
Comparison
of
Entropy
Functions
for
Coupled
Exponential
Distribution
Left)
The
entropy
versus
coupling
with
the
scale
equal
to
one.
The
Coupled
and
Tsallis
entropies
are
both
equal
to
1.
The
Shannon
and
Renyi
entropy
have
close
to
linear
growth.
The
Normalized
Tsallis
entropy
is
similar
to
Shannon
entropy.
Right)
Comparison
of
Shannon
(dashed)
and
Coupled
(solid)
entropy
for
!σ = {0.25,0.5,0.75,1,1.25,1.5,1.75,2} .
Both
entropies
increase
with
the
scale
!σ .
The
Coupled
entropy
does
not
vary
significantly
with
the
coupling,
while
the
Shannon
entropy
has
close
to
linear
growth.
Entropy
4
4
Normalized
Coupled
Tsallis
3
3
Shannon
2
-‐-‐
Shannon
−
Coupled
2
Renyi
1
1
Tsallis
0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Coupling
0
0.0
2.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Coupling
2.0
Figure
4
Comparison
of
Entropy
Functions
for
Coupled
Gaussian
Distribution
Left)
The
entropy
versus
coupling
with
the
scale
equal
to
one.
The
Coupled
and
Shannon
entropy
are
similar
with
close
to
linear
growth.
The
Renyi
entropy
also
has
close
linear
growth
but
with
a
smaller
slope.
The
Normalized
Tsallis
entropy
has
grow
close
to
the
square
of
the
coupling,
while
the
Tsallis
entropy
decays.
Right)
Comparison
of
Shannon
(dashed)
and
Coupled
(solid)
entropy
for
!σ = {0.25,0.5,0.75,1,1.25,1.5,1.75,2} .
Both
entropies
increase
with
the
scale
!σ .
The
Coupled
entropy
has
increased
sensitivity
with
σ as
the
coupling
increase,
while
the
Shannon
entropy
has
close
to
linear
growth.
17
For κ = 0
this
is
the
weighted
geometric
mean
in
which
each
state
is
treated
as
independent
and
thus
multiplied,
and
the
dependency
from
the
probabilities
summing
to
one
is
contained
in
the
weight
of
each
probability.
When κ ≠ 0
the
coupled
product
models
the
nonlinear
dependency
between
the
probabilities
of
the
distribution
and
the
weights
are
now
the
deformed
coupled
probability.
Importantly,
for
the
coupled
exponential
distributions
the
coupled
average
−1
()
probability
is
equal
to
the
density
at
the
location
plus
the
scale Pκ avg = 1Z eκ α 1 .
The
!
coupled
average
probability
has
been
successfully
utilized
in
the
analysis
of
information
fusion
algorithms
[8,41]
and
is
recommended
as
a
simple
approach
to
understanding
the
average
uncertainty
for
nonlinear
systems.
Upon
transformation
to
the
probability
domain
the
Tsallis,
normalized
Tsallis
and
Rényi
entropies
each
fulfill
the
relationship
between
the
coupled
average
uncertainty
and
the
density
at
the
width
of
the
coupled
distributions.
The
potentially
improved
properties
of
the
coupled-‐entropy
are
achieved
by
requiring
the
coupled
logarithm
with
α = 1
to
have
a
unit
integral.
The
coupled
entropy
is
defined
as
the
transformation
of
Pκ avg
to
the
entropy
scale
by
the
coupled
logarithm,
!
−1
1+κ
⎛ ⎛ N (1+ακ )
⎞
⎞
ακ
− ακ
⎛ N 1+1+
⎞
1
1+
κ
(
)
⎜⎜ p
⎟ −1⎟ .
Sα ,κ p ≡ −ln −α ,κ ⎜ ∑ pi κ ⎟
=
(49)
∑
⎟
ακ ⎜⎜ ⎜ i=1 i
⎟
⎝ i=1
⎠
⎟
⎠
⎝⎝
⎠
!
For
the
coupled
exponential
distribution,
the
matching
coupled
entropy
does
not
vary
significantly
with
the
degree
of
coupling.
In
contrast,
for
the
Gaussian
distribution,
the
matching
coupled
entropy
is
sensitive
to
both
the
coupling
and
scale
of
the
distribution.
Further
analysis
and
experimentation
is
recommended
to
determine
how
the
coupled
entropy
can
be
used
to
model
the
effects
of
non-‐
stationary
uncertainty
in
complex
thermodynamic
and
information
systems.
()
18
Appendices
A. Derivation
of
coupled
entropy
from
average
uncertainty
The
coupled
algebra
can
be
used
to
derive
the
equivalency
between
the
two
expressions
for
the
coupled
entropy
1+κ
ακ
⎛
⎞
Sα ,κ p ≡ −ln −α ,κ ⎜ ∑ p
⎟
⎝ i=1
⎠
!
(α ,κ )
where Pi is
the
coupled
probability
(22)
!
N
()
ακ
1+
1+κ
i
1+
p
α ,κ
P( ) = i
N
α ,κ
= − ∑ Pi( ) ln −α ,κ pi
i=1
ακ
1+κ
N
i
∑p
1+
j
ακ
1+κ
j=1
!
Starting
with
the
expression
on
the
right,
the
coupled
power
is
used
to
move
the
coupled
probability
from
a
multiplier
of
the
generalized
logarithm
to
a
power
of
the
⊗b− ακ
argument
using
the
property
bln −α ,κ x = ln −α ,κ x
!
N
()
⊗
Sα ,κ p = − ∑ ln −α ,κ pi
i=1
!
(1+κ )
(
(
− ακ / 1+κ
Pi
− ακ 1+κ
(
)
))
.
N
N
Expanding
the
coupled
power
and
using
the
property
∑ ln −α ,κ x = ln −α ,κ ∏ ⊗ x ,
− ακ
i=1
1+κ
! i=1
⎛ α ,κ
Sα ,κ p = −ln −α ,κ ∏ ⊗ ⎜ Pi( ) p
− ακ
⎝
i=1
1+κ
!
()
− ακ
1+κ
i
N
N
((
Expanding
the
coupled
product
and
reducing
∑ Pi
! i=1
⎛ N α ,κ
Sα ,κ p = −ln −α ,κ ⎜ ∑ Pi( ) p
⎝ i=1
− ακ
1+κ
i
()
⎛
= −ln −α ,κ ⎜ ∑ p
⎝ i=1
N
!
ακ
1+
1+κ
i
⎞
⎟
⎠
⎞
⎟
⎠
1+κ
ακ
.
19
1+κ
− ακ
(
)
⎞
α ,κ
− Pi( ) −1 ⎟
⎠
α ,κ
1+κ
− ακ
.
)
) −1 = 1− N
,
⎛ N
⎜ ∑ pi
= −ln −α ,κ ⎜ N i=1 ακ
1+
⎜
1+κ
⎜⎝ ∑ pi
i=1
⎞
⎟
⎟
⎟
⎟⎠
1+κ
− ακ
Since
the
normalized
Tsallis
entropy
is
just
a
multiple
of
the
coupled
entropy,
the
derivation
is
not
repeated.
The
derivation
of
the
Tsallis
entropy
starts
with
the
middle
expression
of
equation
(46)
() (
)
N
ακ
1+κ
S p ≡ − 1+ κ ∑ pi
ln −α ,κ pi .
i=1
!
The
relationship
is
expressed
in
terms
of
the
coupled
product
and
coupled
power
T
α ,κ
() (
)
1+
N
⊗
SαT ,κ p = − 1+ κ ln −α ,κ ∏ ⊗ pi
− ακ
i=1
1+κ
!
Expanding
the
coupled
power
and
the
coupled
power
ακ
1+
pi 1+κ
− ακ 1+κ
(
)
.
1+κ
SαT ,κ
⎛ N ⎛
⎞ −ακ
⎛ 1+ ακ
⎞⎞
p = − 1+ κ ln −α ,κ ⎜ ∑ ⎜ pi − ⎜ pi 1+κ −1⎟ ⎟ − N −1 ⎟ .
⎝
⎠⎠
⎝ i=1 ⎝
⎠
() (
)
(
)
!
Simplifying
and
using
the
relationship
− ln −α ,κ x − b = lnα ,κ x b
1+κ
SαT ,κ
!
⎛ N 1+ ακ ⎞ ακ
p = 1+ κ lnα ,κ ⎜ ∑ pi 1+κ ⎟ .
⎝ i=1
⎠
() (
)
B. Comparison
of
generalized
entropy
functions
The
comparison
of
entropy
functions
for
the
Coupled
Exponential
and
Coupled
Gaussian
distributions
shown
in
Figure
3
and
Figure
4
includes
the
following
computations.
The
distributions
analyzed
are
) (1+κ )
(
expdistκ x; µ ,σ ≡
!
1
σ
x− µ
σ
⎛1 ⎞
−⎜ +1⎟
⎝κ ⎠
(50)
1⎛ 1 ⎞
− ⎜ +1⎟
2
2⎝ κ ⎠
κ Γ ⎡⎣ 1+2κκ ⎤⎦ ⎛
⎛ x −µ⎞ ⎞
Gκ x; µ ,σ ≡
.
(51)
⎜ 1+ κ ⎜
⎟
⎝ σ ⎟⎠ ⎟⎠
π Γ ⎡⎣ 21κ ⎤⎦ ⎜⎝
!
The
computations
were
completed
using
MathematicaTM.
For
the
Coupled,
Tsallis,
and
Normalized
Tsallis
entropy
with
matching
coupling,
closed
form
solutions
exist.
The
entropy
functions
of
the
coupled
exponential
with
!σ = 1
reduce
to
a
linear
expression.
a) Coupled
Entropy
(
)
( )) = (
(
(expdist ( x;µ ,1)) = 1
S1,Cκ expdistκ x; µ ,σ
!S1,Cκ
!
κ
20
)
κ
−1+ 1+ κ σ 1+κ
κ
(52)
( (
S2,Cκ Gκ x; µ ,σ
!
(
(
T
1,κ
S
S1,Tκ
!
)( )
(
−κ + 1+ κ κπ
=
⎛ Γ
⎜σ
⎝ Γ
( )
( )
1
2κ
1+κ
2κ
2κ
⎞ 1+κ
⎟
⎠
2κ 2
(53)
b) Tsallis
Entropy
))
1
κ 1+κ
( (
−κ
))
))
1+ κ − σ 1+κ
expdistκ x; µ ,σ =
κ
expdistκ x; µ ,1 = 1
S2,Tκ Gκ x; µ ,σ
(
(
))
!
⎛
1⎜
1
= ⎜ 1+ − κπ κ
2
κ
⎜⎝
( )
−1
1+κ
(54)
⎛ σΓ ⎡ ⎤ ⎞
⎣ ⎦
⎜
⎟
1+κ
⎝ Γ ⎡⎣ 2κ ⎤⎦ ⎠
1
2κ
−
2κ
1+κ
⎞
⎟
⎟
⎟⎠
(55)
c) Normalized
Tsallis
NT
1,κ
S
S1,NTκ
!
(
(
κ
⎛
⎞
1+ κ ⎜ −1+ 1+ κ σ 1+κ ⎟
⎝
⎠
expdistκ x; µ ,σ =
κ
expdistκ x; µ ,1 = 1+ κ
( (
S2,NTκ Gκ x; µ ,σ
!
))
)
(
⎛
⎜
1+ κ ⎜ −κ + 1+ κ κπ κ
⎜⎝
=
2κ 2
(
))
))
(
(
(
)
(
)( )
)
1
1+κ
(56)
2κ
⎞
⎛ σΓ 21κ ⎞ 1+κ ⎟
⎜
⎟ ⎟
1+κ
⎝ Γ 2κ ⎠ ⎟
⎠
( )
( )
(57)
Closed
form
solutions
do
not
exist
for
the
Shannon
and
Renyi
entropies.
The
numerical
integration
of
the
Shannon
entropy
has
potential
errors
for
a)
small
values
of
κ
when
the
integration
extends
to
regions
where
− ln f ( x )
f (x )
is
undefined
or
b)
large
values
of
κ
when
the
integration
is
truncated
before
− ln f ( x )
f (x )
has
decayed
sufficiently
to
be
excluded.
For
this
reason
the
Shannon
entropy
was
determined
as
a
piecewise
numerical
integration
with
the
following
limits
x !Limit
!
Coupling
100
0.00 < κ < 0.09
1000 0.09 ≤ κ < 0.74
10,000 0.74 ≤ κ < 1.50
15,000 1.50 ≤ κ ≤ 2.00.
21
(58)
References
[1]
T.M.
Cover,
J.A.
Thomas,
Elements
of
information
theory,
John
Wiley
&
Sons,
2012.
[2]
A.I.
Khinchin,
Mathematical
Foundations
of
Statistical
Mechanics,
Courier
Corporation,
1949.
[3]
A.I.
Khinchin,
Mathematical
Foundations
of
Information
Theory,
Courier
Corporation,
1957.
[4]
A.
Rényi,
On
measures
of
entropy
and
information,
Fourth
Berkeley
Symp.
Math.
Stat.
Probab.
1
(1961)
547–561.
[5]
C.
Tsallis,
Possible
generalization
of
Boltzmann-‐Gibbs
statistics,
J.
Stat.
Phys.
52
(1988)
479–487.
[6]
S.I.
Amari,
H.
Nagaoka,
Methods
of
Information
Geometry,
Oxford
University
Press,
2000.
[7]
C.
Anteneodo,
C.
Tsallis,
A.S.
Martinez,
Risk
aversion
in
trade
transactions,
Eur.
Lett.
59
(2002)
635–641.
[8]
K.P.
Nelson,
B.J.
Scannell,
H.
Landau,
A
Risk
Profile
for
Information
Fusion
Algorithms,
Entropy.
13
(2011)
1518–1532.
[9]
I.
Santamaria,
D.
Erdogmus,
J.C.
Principe,
Entropy
minimization
for
supervised
digital
communications
channel
equalization,
IEEE
Trans.
Signal
Process.
50
(2002)
1184–1192.
doi:10.1109/78.995074.
[10]
W.R.
Carson,
M.
Chen,
M.R.D.
Rodrigues,
R.
Calderbank,
L.
Carin,
Communications-‐Inspired
Projection
Design
with
Application
to
Compressive
Sensing,
SIAM
J.
Imaging
Sci.
5
(2012)
1185–1212.
doi:10.1137/120878380.
[11]
E.P.
Borges,
C.
Tsallis,
G.F.J.
Ananos,
P.M.C.
de
Oliveira,
Nonequilibrium
probabilistic
dynamics
of
the
logistic
map
at
the
edge
of
chaos,
Phys.
Rev.
Lett.
89
(2002)
254103.
[12]
G.
Livadiotis,
D.J.
McComas,
Beyond
kappa
distributions:
Exploiting
Tsallis
statistical
mechanics
in
space
plasmas,
J.
Geophys.
Res.
114
(2009)
A11105.
doi:10.1029/2009JA014352.
[13]
L.F.
Burlaga,
A.F.
Vinas,
Triangle
for
the
entropic
index
q
of
non-‐extensive
statistical
mechanics
observed
by
Voyager
1
in
the
distant
heliosphere,
Phys.
A
Stat.
Mech.
Its
Appl.
356
(2005)
375–384.
[14]
S.
Chatrchyan,
V.
Khachatryan,
A.M.
Sirunyan,
A.
Tumasyan,
W.
Adam,
T.
Bergauer,
et
al.,
Charged
particle
transverse
momentum
spectra
in
pp
collisions
at
s = 0.9
and
7
TeV,
J.
High
Energy
Phys.
2011
(2011)
86.
doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2011)086.
22
[15]
V.
Khachatryan,
A.M.
Sirunyan,
A.
Tumasyan,
W.
Adam,
T.
Bergauer,
M.
Dragicevic,
et
al.,
Transverse-‐momentum
and
pseudorapidity
distributions
of
charged
hadrons
in
pp
collisions
at
square
root
of
s
=
7
TeV.,
Phys.
Rev.
Lett.
105
(2010)
022002.
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.022002.
[16]
N.
Canosa,
R.
Rossignoli,
Generalized
nonadditive
entropies
and
quantum
entanglement,
Phys.
Rev.
Lett.
88
(2002)
170401.
[17]
R.
Hanel,
S.
Thurner,
M.
Gell-‐Mann,
Generalized
entropies
and
the
transformation
group
of
superstatistics,
Proc.
Natl.
Acad.
Sci.
108
(2011)
6390.
[18]
R.
Hanel,
S.
Thurner,
A
comprehensive
classification
of
complex
statistical
systems
and
an
axiomatic
derivation
of
their
entropy
and
distribution
functions,
EPL
(Europhysics
Lett.
93
(2011)
20006.
[19]
A.
Rényi,
On
the
Foundations
of
Information
Theory,
Rev.
Int.
Stat.
Inst.
33
(1965)
1–14.
[20]
C.
Tsallis,
Introduction
to
Nonextensive
Statistical
Mechanics:
Approaching
a
Complex
World,
Springer
Verlag,
2009.
[21]
K.P.
Nelson,
S.
Umarov,
Nonlinear
statistical
coupling,
Phys.
A
Stat.
Mech.
Its
Appl.
389
(2010)
2157–2163.
[22]
T.J.
Arruda,
R.S.
González,
C.A.S.
Terçariol,
A.S.
Martinez,
Arithmetical
and
geometrical
means
of
generalized
logarithmic
and
exponential
functions:
generalized
sum
and
product
operators,
Phys.
Lett.
A.
372
(2008)
2578–2582.
[23]
Q.A.
Wang,
L.
Nivanen,
A.
Le
Mehaute,
M.
Pezeril,
On
the
generalized
entropy
pseudoadditivity
for
complex
systems,
J.
Phys.
A.
Math.
Gen.
35
(2002)
7003–
7007.
[24]
G.
Kaniadakis,
M.
Lissia,
A.M.
Scarfone,
Two-‐parameter
deformations
of
logarithm,
exponential,
and
entropy:
A
consistent
framework
for
generalized
statistical
mechanics,
Phys.
Rev.
E.
71
(2005)
046128.
doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.71.046128.
[25]
K.S.
Narendra,
K.
Parthasarathy,
Identification
and
control
of
dynamical
systems
using
neural
networks.,
IEEE
Trans.
Neural
Netw.
1
(1990)
4–27.
doi:10.1109/72.80202.
[26]
S.H.
Strogatz,
Exploring
complex
networks.,
Nature.
410
(2001)
268–76.
doi:10.1038/35065725.
[27]
T.
Oikonomou,
Tsallis,
Renyi
and
nonextensive
Gaussian
entropy
derived
from
the
respective
multinomial
coefficients,
Phys.
A
Stat.
Mech.
Its
Appl.
386
(2007)
119–134.
[28]
K.P.
Nelson,
A
definition
of
the
coupled-‐product
for
multivariate
coupled-‐
exponentials,
Phys.
A
Stat.
Mech.
Its
Appl.
422
(2015)
187–192.
doi:10.1016/j.physa.2014.12.023.
23
[29]
E.P.
Borges,
A
possible
deformed
algebra
and
calculus
inspired
in
nonextensive
thermostatistics,
Phys.
A
Stat.
Mech.
Its
Appl.
340
(2004)
95–
101.
[30]
C.
Anteneodo,
C.
Tsallis,
Multiplicative
noise:
A
mechanism
leading
to
nonextensive
statistical
mechanics,
J.
Math.
Phys.
44
(2003)
5194.
[31]
C.
Beck,
E.G.D.
Cohen,
Superstatistics,
Phys.
A
Stat.
Mech.
Its
Appl.
322
(2003)
267–275.
[32]
G.
Wilk,
Z.
Włodarczyk,
Interpretation
of
the
Nonextensivity
Parameter
q
in
Some
Applications
of
Tsallis
Statistics
and
Lévy
Distributions,
Phys.
Rev.
Lett.
84
(2000)
2770–2773.
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2770.
[33]
W.
Gossett,
The
Application
of
the
“Law
of
Error”
to
the
Work
of
the
Brewery,
Dublin,
1904.
[34]
A.
Shah,
A.
Wilson,
Z.
Ghahramani,
Student-‐t
processes
as
alternatives
to
Gaussian
processes,
arXiv
Prepr.
arXiv1402.4306.
(2014).
[35]
A.C.
de
Souza,
C.
Tsallis,
Student’s
t-‐
and
r-‐distributions:
Unified
derivation
from
an
entropic
variational
principle,
Phys.
A
Stat.
Mech.
Its
Appl.
236
(1997)
52–57.
doi:10.1016/S0378-‐4371(96)00395-‐0.
[36]
S.
Umarov,
C.
Tsallis,
On
multivariate
generalizations
of
the
q-‐central
limit
theorem
consistent
with
nonextensive
statistical
mechanics,
AIP
Conf.
Proc.
965
(2007)
34.
[37]
G.
Kaniadakis,
M.
Lissia,
A.M.
Scarfone,
Two-‐parameter
deformations
of
logarithm,
exponential,
and
entropy:
A
consistent
framework
for
generalized
statistical
mechanics,
Phys.
Rev.
E.
71
(2005)
46128.
[38]
S.
Umarov,
C.
Tsallis,
M.
Gell-‐Mann,
S.
Steinberg,
Generalization
of
symmetric
alpha-‐stable
Lévy
distributions
for
q>1.,
J.
Math.
Phys.
51
(2010)
33502.
doi:10.1063/1.3305292.
[39]
C.
Tsallis,
A.R.
Plastino,
R.F.
Alvarez-‐Estrada,
Escort
mean
values
and
the
characterization
of
power-‐law-‐decaying
probability
densities,
J.
Math.
Phys.
50
(2009)
43303.
[40]
C.
Lassner,
R.
Lienhart,
Norm-‐Induced
Entropies
for
Decision
Forests,
in:
2015
IEEE
Winter
Conf.
Appl.
Comput.
Vis.,
IEEE,
2015:
pp.
968–975.
doi:10.1109/WACV.2015.134.
[41]
K.P.
Nelson,
Reduced
perplexity:
Uncertainty
measures
without
entropy,
in:
Recent
Innov.
Info-‐Metrics,
Washington,
D.C.,
2014.
24
| 10math.ST
|
Learning Sparse Visual Representations with Leaky Capped Norm Regularizers
Jianqiao Wangni∗
arXiv:1711.02857v1 [cs.LG] 8 Nov 2017
Tsinghua University
Beijing, China
[email protected]
Abstract
Sparsity inducing regularization is an important part for
learning over-complete visual representations. Despite the
popularity of `1 regularization, in this paper, we investigate the usage of non-convex regularizations in this problem. Our contribution consists of three parts. First, we propose the leaky capped norm regularization (LCNR), which
allows model weights below a certain threshold to be regularized more strongly as opposed to those above, therefore
imposes strong sparsity and only introduces controllable estimation bias. We propose a majorization-minimization algorithm to optimize the joint objective function. Second, our
study over monocular 3D shape recovery and neural networks
with LCNR outperforms `1 and other non-convex regularizations, achieving state-of-the-art performance and faster convergence. Third, we prove a theoretical global convergence
speed on the 3D recovery problem. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first convergence analysis of the 3D recovery
problem.
Introduction
The sparse models have been widely applied in machine
learning and computer vision tasks. To encourage sparsity,
the `1 norm is widely adopted as a regularizer, which can
produce reasonable results in various cases. For an example,
to analyse the 3D shape of an object, from a monocular 2D
camera, one can build a dictionary of 3D shape bases from
datasets, and inference the sparse combination weights of
the bases (Zhou et al. 2016). Yet, a number of studies suggested that it is not always the optimal choice, non-convex
regularizers can often lead to better balance between sparsity and accuracy in practice. Particularly, a number of nonconvex regularizers have been explored in previous work,
such as `p norm (Frank et al. 1993), MCP (Zhang 2010a),
SCAD (Fan and Li 2011), Logarithm (Friedman 2012), and
capped norm (Zhang 2010b)(Zhang and others 2013). However, the studied models are mostly restricted to be convex
ones, therefore lack suitability to larger application scope.
This is reasonable since, first, the convex problem with
non-convex regularizers are already difficult to analyse, the
global optima can only be obtained with additional statistical assumptions. The non-convex problem, even without
∗
This work was done when the first author was a visiting research assistant at CUHK.
Dahua Lin
The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Hong Kong, China
[email protected]
regularizers, is much more difficult to optimize, the solver
for non-convex will converges much slower comparing to
when it applies to convex ones.
In this work, we will concentrate on the learning better
sparse models, with considerations on the running time limitation, which commonly exists, especially in testing stage.
For an example, the aforementioned 3D shape recovery
models have achieved good enough accuracy, but they converge too slow for real-time applications. Although directly
enlarging the `1 regularizer will force more small weights
to be zeros within limited time, but this will certainly compromise the accuracy since the larger and effective weights
are also penalized strongly. In this work, we aim to move
beyond the limitations of existing literatures and develop a
novel regularizer that can achieve high sparsity and high accuracy in learning sparse representations (like other successful applications based on non-convex regularizers), The key
to achieve this goal is to force more smaller weights to zeros by a stronger regularization, but not so far as to leading
larger weights deviating from the ground truth. Following
this idea, we propose a novel non-convex regularizer, called
Leaky Capped Norm, which is a generalization of the capped
norms, but enjoys nice mathematical properties and demonstrates higher performance in experiments. We also derive a
doubly majorization-minimization algorithm, which is suitable for both convex and nonconvex loss functions. We also
take the 3D shape recovery problem for detailed analysis.
By relaxing the objective to a convex one, we can apply
an ADMM solver and get a theoretical global convergence.
We also conducted experiments on sparse neural networks
to show the efficiency in compressing kernel weights.
Leaky Capped `1 Norm
A standard sparse model consists of a loss function L (which
we assume to be differentiable but possibly nonconvex) and
a regularization part H on the weights c
1 X
min
L(xn , c) + H(c).
(1)
c N
n
where {xn } are data points. A popular choice for H is the
`1 norm, due to its convinience for optimization and that it
is good surrogate for `0 norm. There are also some literatures suggesting that the `1 norm is in many case inferior
to non-convex norms for inducing sparsity. To motivate our
new regularizer, we begin with a discussion on the representative capped `1 norm (Zhang 2010b):
X
H(c) = α
min(|ci |, τ ), where α, τ > 0.
(2)
i
As shown in Figure 1, this formulation only regularizes
those weights that are below a certain threshold τ . For those
beyond this value, they can grow arbitrarily without experiencing penalties. It is noteworthy that it is a generalization
of `1 norm. Particularly, it becomes `1 as τ → ∞. Generally, with a finite τ , it approximates `0 better than `1 , and
therefore leads to higher sparsity in some real-world applications. The key feature of capped norm is the lack of penalty
A representative optimization algorithm for solving convex problems with nonconvex regularizer is the multistage algorithm (Zhang 2010b), it is guaranteed to converge
since it is essentially a special case of the majorizationminimization (MM) algorithm (Hunter and Lange 2004). To
be more specific, at the (l + 1)-th stage, the surrogate objective is
H l+1 (c) = |cT | · λl , where λli = αI(|cli | ≤ τ ) + βI(|cli | > τ ),
where cl is the optimal c at the l-th stage, but the surrogate
loss remains the same as original one. We set the initialization parameter λ0i = β, so as to begin with a light regularization for all weights. Based on the algorithm, one can see
that the parameter selection is simpler - one can first search
β for accuracy and then α for sparsity.
Monocular 3D Shape Recovery
Now we proceed to demonstrating the usage of the proposed
regularizer and algorithms for solving a computer vision
problem, the 3D shape analysis of visual objects. Driven
by the demands arising from real-world applications, 3D
Figure 1: Geometric view of three kinds of norms.
shape recovery from 2D images has received increasing atfor weights whose magnitudes are greater than τ , this featention from the computer vision community in recent years.
ture, however, may become a drawback under some circumA key challenge of this task lies in the fact that different
stances. For examples, in our empirical study on 3D shape
3D shapes can be projected to the same 2D image, resultrecovery, which is introduced later, the capped norm leads
ing in an ill-posed problem. A commonly adopted approach
to unstable optimization procedures and substantially worse
is to restrict the recovered 3D shape to be a linear comsolutions, by the multi-stage algorithm introduced later. Anbination of a set predefined shape bases. A representative
other difficulty shared by both `1 and capped `1 norms is the
model in early ages along this line is the Active Shape Model
parameters selection – it is often very tricky to find a good
(ASM)(Cootes et al. 1995), which relies on a dense combivalue of τ and α that well balances between accuracy and
nation for shape representation. Later advances, like (Hejrati
sparsity. From an optimization perspective, the two parameand Ramanan 2012)(Zia et al. 2013)(Wang et al. 2014))(Xiters are both critical to the most common proximal operator,
ang and Savarese 2012)(Ramakrishna, Kanade, and Sheikh
as
2012)(Lin et al. 2014)however, shows that sparse representation is more effective in real-world applications, of1
arg min ||x − c||2 + H(x) = sign(c) max(|c| − I(c < τ )α, 0), ten demonstrating stronger generalization performance and
x 2
higher robustness against adverse conditions.
where I(·) is the indicator function that equals to one for
The 3D shape, i.e. the 3D locations of p landmarks are
truth and zero for false. As implied by theoretical analystacked as S ∈ R3×p , and its corresponding 2D shape is Y ∈
sis and shown in our experiments, larger values of α and τ
R2×p . We denote the projection matrix as Π. The Active
would yield sparser solutions, but at the same time damage
Shape Models (ASM) (Cootes et al. 1995) proposed training
the larger weights and consequently compromise the accua group of shape bases {Bi }D
i=1 from data by methods like
racy. With the analysis above in mind, we propose the Leaky
principal component analysis, denoting D = {1, · · · , D} as
Capped `1 Norm Regularizer (LCNR) as an improved varia set of subscripts and c as weights of each basis. The 3D-2D
ant:
shape relation is characterized as
X
X
X
H(c) = α
min(|ci |, τ ) + β
max(|ci |, τ ),
(3)
S=
ci Bi , Y = ΠS,
i
i
where 0 < β < α. As shown in Figure 1, the function of
LCNR is piecewise linear and thus is differentiable (except
at a few points). The key difference between the proposed
formulation and the standard `1 norm and the capped norm
is that large weights (i.e. those greater than τ ) are still penalized positively but less heavily. To be more specific, this
generalizes the capped `1 norm, with an additional coefficient β to control how much those large weights are regularized. In particular, when β = 0, it reduces to the regular
capped norm.
where Π =
i∈D
ω
0
0
ω
0
, c ∈ RD , Bi ∈ R3×p
0
(4)
here ω is a parameter depending on physical factors like focal length and view depth. In the test phase, the 2D shape
Y is annotated by regular visual detectors, since the shape
bases B are most likely predefined in a different camera setting other than the test setting, the unknown factors including combination weights c, a relative rotation parameter R
and a translation parameter T should all be considered in the
projection model,
X
Y = Π(R
ci Bi + T ), where R ∈ SO(3), T ∈ R3 (5)
i∈D
where I3 ∈ R3×3 is an identity matrix and SO(3) = {R ∈
R3×3 | RT R = I3 , det(R) = 1}. In addition, (Zhou
et al. 2016) proposed distributing individual rotation matrix Ri ∈ R3×3 to eachPbasis, then the 3D and 2D shapes
are represented as =
i∈D ci Ri Bi . They substitute the
bilinear term composed of Π and R by uniform variables
{Mi ∈ R2×3 }i∈D , that Mi = ci ΠRi which implicitly take
rotation and projection factors into account. Denoting M as
a 3 dimensional tensor stacking {Mi }D
i=1 , we rewrite the objective as
X
1
min F (M, c) = ||Y −
Mi Bi ||2F + H(c), (6)
2
Ri ∈Ω(ci ),c
i∈D
where Ω(ci ) = {Mi ∈ R2×3 |MiT Mi = c2i I2 },
and H(c) is the regularization and I2 ∈ R2×2 is an identity
matrix. In our model of 3D shape recovery, we adopt the
linear formulation as Eq.(6) since it is the best baseline up
until now and has some attractive properties. Our objective
function is same with Eq.(6), H(c) is set to be LCNR as
Eq.(3). The objective with a stage-wise surrogate regularizer
is
X
X
1
Mi Bi ||2F +
λli |ci |,
(7)
F l+1 (M, c) = ||Y −
2
i∈D
i∈D
in the (l + 1)-th stage, where Mi ∈ Ω(ci ). In this optimizer,
the regularization part of F (R, c) is convex in each stage,
however, the surrogate function is still non-convex since
there is an orthogonality constraint on each Mi . To build
the upper bounding function, we make a convex relaxation
on the constraints. As the spectral-norm ball conv(Ω(ci )) =
{X ∈ R2×3 | ||X||2 ≤ ci }, is the tightest convex hull of
the Stiefel manifold Ω(ci ) (Zhou et al. 2016) [(Journée et
al. 2010), Section 3.4], where || · ||2 represents the spectral
norm, which is its largest singular value. Finally, by relaxing
the domain Ω to conv(Ω), and the recalibration rule of λi is
transferred to λli = αI(||M̂il ||2 ≤ τ ) + βI(||M̂il ||2 > τ ),
where M̂il is the optimal Mi in the l-th stage.
Since the function is convexified, We employ the alternate direction method of multiplier (ADMM) (Boyd et al.
2011)(Zhou et al. 2016) algorithm to attain high-precision
solutions. We introduce a tensor V as a copy of M , U as
a dual tensor variable and µ as a stepsize parameter, then
rewrite Eq.(7) in its augmented Lagrangian formulation
X
X
1
Vi Bi ||2F +
λli ||Mi ||2
Fµl+1 (M, V, U ) = ||Y −
2
i∈D
i∈D
X
µX
T
+
Ui (Mi − Vi ) +
||Mi − Vi ||2 (8)
2
i∈D
i∈D
Then the ADMM procedure is applied to solve the subproblem. After the convergence, the multi-stage solver will update the surrogate functions. We denote the inner-iteration
superscript as t. Then M t+1 is update based on the proximal operator on spectral norms [(Parikh, Boyd, and others
2014), Section 6.7.2],
proxλ (Vi0 ) = P diag[σ − λ0i P1 (σ/λ0i )]QT ,
(9)
where Vi0 = Vit − Uit /µ and λ0i = λli /µ. Denoting the solution as proxλ0i (Vi0 ), Vi0 = P diag(σ)QT is the singular
value decomposition of Vi0 , and P1 (·) is the Euclidean projection onto the `1 norm ball. The update on V and U have
closed form solutions,
Vit+1 = (Y BiT + µMit+1 + Uit+1 )(Bi BiT + µI3 )−1 , (10)
Uit+1 = Uit + µ(Mit − Vit ). (11)
The convergence property of this algorithm is well studied in
(Boyd et al. 2011), additionally, we adopt an adaptive policy
for stepsize µ as suggested by [(Boyd et al. 2011), Section
3].
Theoretical Analysis
Generally speaking, the convergence of optimization over
non-convex function is typical hard to prove without a decreasing step size. When combined with nonconvex regularizers, even convex problems need highly specialized proofs,
for each problem. One may see the hardness of by referring to literatures, on the theoretical analysis of capped
norm in different applications, e.g., multi-task feature learning (Gong, Ye, and Zhang 2012)(Tang, Nie, and Jain 2016),
matrix completion (Gao et al. 2015) and (Jiang, Nie, and
Huang 2015)(Sun, Xiang, and Ye 2013)(Han and Zhang
2016)(Zhang 2010b)(Zhang and others 2013). The proof is
harder for our problem since the loss function is already nonconvex. In this section, we theoretically prove that with a
high probability, the recovery error of our multi-stage algorithm decreases at nearly exponential speed against stages.
We assume that the ground truth of the 2D shape Ȳ ∈ R2×p
is expressed as a projection P
of the combined deformation
of 3D shape bases, as Ȳ = i∈D M̄i Bi , where M̄i is the
ground truth of deformation matrix Mi , for 0 ≤ i ≤ D. The
observation model is Y = Ȳ + δ, where δ ∈ R2×p is a
Gaussian noise, i.e. δjk ∼ N (0, σ 2 ). For notational simplicity, we also set γ = α + β.
Assumption 1 For any matrix Mi ∈ Rn×m , we assume that
there exist a constant κi that
κi =
min ||Z − Mi Bi ||F /||Mi ||? > 0,
Mi ∈R(s)
(12)
where the restricted set R(s) is defined as R(s) = {X ∈
Rn×m | rank(X) ≤ s}.
Remark 1 This is the widely used eigenvalue assumption
which can be found in (Lounici et al. 2009).
Theorem 2 Following the common setting of sparse dictionary learning, we assume
each basis Bi are normalized
P that
2
by row `2 norm that k Birk
= φ for all i ∈ D, 1 ≤ r ≤ 3,
2×3
where φ is an constant. For the optimal matrix
√ M̂i ∈ R
in any stage, if we set α, β as (α + β) ≥ φ 3 + e/2, then it
holds
X
X
1
1
||Ȳ −
M̂i Bi ||2F ≤ ||Ȳ −
Mi Bi ||2F
2
2
i∈D
i∈D
X
l
+
(4γ + λi )||Mi − M̂i ||2 ,
(13)
i∈D
with the probability of at least 1 − 2D exp(− 12 (e − 3 ln(1 +
e/3))), where e is a positive scalar.
Proof. Recalling that Y = Ȳ +δ and the property of optimal
point M̂i , then we have
X
X
1
1
||Ȳ −
M̂i Bi ||2F ≤ ||Ȳ −
Mi Bi ||2F (14)
2
2
i∈D
i∈D
X
X
l
+
λi ||Mi − M̂i ||2 +
tr[(Mi − M̂i )Bi δ T ], (15)
i∈D
i∈D
where we use the triangular inequality of spectral norm
||Mi ||2 − ||M̂i ||2 ≤ ||Mi − M̂i ||2 .
(16)
We first establish the upper bound of tr[(M̂i − Mi )Bi δ T ].
We denote a set of random events {Aij } and define a set of
random variables {vijr } as
p
Aij =
{||BiT δj ||2
≤ φγ},
vijr
1X
Birk δjk , (17)
=
φ
k=1
where Birk is the element in the r-th row and k-th column of
Bi . Since Bi is normalized, vijr are i.i.d. Gaussian variables
P3
2
following N (0, 1). Then we can verify that r=1 vijr
is a
chi-squared random variable with d = 3 degree of freedom.
By choosing λ according to Theorem 2, we have
p
3 X
X
1
Birk δjk )2 > 4γ 2 )
P r( ||Bi δjT ||2 > γ) = P r( (
2
r=1
k=1
≤ P r(
3
X
1
2
vijr
> 3 + e) ≤ exp(− θ(e)), (18)
2
r=1
where θ(e) = e − 3 ln(1 + e/3) and the second inequality
is due to the chi-squared distribution (Chen, Zhou, and Ye
T D T2
2011). Denoting A = i=1 j=1 Aij , we also denote Ac
as its complementary set and |A| as its cardinality, then
P r(A) = 1 −
D [
2
[
i=1 j=1
Acij
1
≥ 1 − 2D exp(− θ(e)). (19)
2
Denoting Mir as the r-th row of Mi , we can derive an upper
bound on tr[(M̂i − Mi )Bi δ T ] under the event A,
tr[(Mi − M̂i )Bi δ T ] =
≤
2 X
2
X
r=1 j=1
2 X
2
X
(Mir − M̂ir )T Bi δjT
r=1 j=1
||Mir − M̂ir ||2 ||Bi δjT ||2 ≤ 4γ||Mi − M̂i ||2 , (20)
where we apply the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and the relation between Frobenius norm and spectral norm. By substituting this back to Eq.(14), we get the proof.
Theorem 3 Let M̂il+1 be the optimal solution at the (l + 1)th stage, and M̂il be the one at the l-th stage accordingly. We
define Wil = M̄i − M̂il , and a function L on set S ⊆ D.
If we choose α, β as in Theorem 1 and choose τ as τ >
(α + β)/κ2 , the following inequality stands
sX
b
l
Ll+1 (D) ≤ a L0 (D) +
, where Ll (S) =
||Wil ||22 ,
1−a
i∈S
with probability of at least 1 −
− 3 ln(1 +
e/3))),
where
a
=
(α
+
β)/(κ
τ
),
and
b
= 5(α +
√
2
β) D/(κ τ ).
2D exp(− 21 (e
2
Proof . We apply Theorem 2 in stage (l+1) and substitute
M by its ground truth M̄ , then get
X
X
1
||Ȳ −
M̂il+1 Bi ||2F ≤
(4γ + λli )||Wil+1 ||2 , (21)
2
i∈D
i∈D
P
where we use Ȳ = i∈D M̄i Bi . We define a set G = {i ∈
D | ||M̂il ||2 ≤ τ } to separate the weights, and
αil = αI(i ∈ G),
βil = βI(i ∈ G c ),
(22)
then there is λli = αil + βil . Then we establish a bound by
Cauchy-Schwarz inequality,
X
X
(λli + 4γ)||Wil+1 ||2 =
(αil + βil + 4γ)||Wil+1 ||2
i∈D
i∈D
√
≤ (4γ D + α
p
p
|G| + β |G c |)Ll+1 (D). (23)
To further bound this term, we first denote that
E = {i ∈ D | ||M̄i ||2 6= 0}, F = {i ∈ D | ||M̄i ||2 ≤ 2τ }, (24)
by the rule of set operation and the definition of G and F,
|G| = |G ∩ F| + |G ∩ F c |, where |G ∩ F| ≤ |F |, (25)
X
||M̄i − M̂il ||22 ≤ L2l (G ∩ F c ); (26)
τ 2 |G ∩ F c | ≤
i∈G∩F c
by the inequality ||M̄i − M̂il ||2 ≥ ||M̄i ||2 − ||M̂il ||2 ≥ τ .
Substituting them back to Eq.(23), we get
q
X
αil ||Wil+1 ||2 ≤ α |F| + L2l (F c )/τ 2 Ll+1 (D) (27)
i∈D
p
α
Ll (F c ))Ll+1 (D), (28)
τ
√
where in the last inequality we use a2 + b2 ≤ a + b for
a, b ≥ 0. A similar result holds for another part of Eq.(23)
as
X
p
β
βil ||Wil+1 ||2 ≤ (β |E| + Ll (E c ))Ll+1 (D). (29)
τ
≤ (α
|F| +
i∈D
Substituting them back to Eq.(21), there is
X
X
1
||Ȳ −
M̂il+1 Bi ||2F ≤
(4γ + λli )||Wil+1 ||2
2
i∈D
i∈D
p
√
1
≤ γ(4 D + max(|E|, |F|) + Ll (D))Ll+1 (D), (30)
τ
Recalling Assumption 1 and substituting Z = M̄i Bi , then
1
||Wil+1 Bi ||2F ,
(31)
2
where we use ||X||F ≤ ||X||2 . Denoting κ = mini κi , then
X
X
X
2κ2
||Wil+1 ||22 ≤
||Wil+1 Bi ||2F ≤ ||
Wil+1 Bi ||2F .
κ2i ||Wil+1 ||22 ≤ κ2i ||Wil+1 ||2? ≤
i∈D
i∈D
i∈D
Substituting this to Eq.(21) and combining for i ∈ D, there
is
√
1
κ2 L2l+1 (D) ≤ (α + β)(5 D + Ll (D))Ll+1 (D). (32)
τ
where we apply max(|E|, |F|) ≤ D. Recalling the definition
of a and b, we obtain
1 − al+1
(33)
1−a
by the pre-setting 0 < a < 1, we obtain the main theorem.
Ll+1 (D) ≤ aLl (D) + b ≤ al+1 L0 (D) + b
Remark 2 Theorem 3 establishes the global convergence
property of the estimation error in terms of a sum of spectral norms, and further implies that the value of Ll (D) is
decaying exponentially after l stages, and the algorithm is
less sensitive to the initial values.
Sparse Neural Networks
The convolutional neural networks (CNN) are powerful models for learning visual patterns from raw images.Generally speaking, the practical networks have too
many parameters to fit in mobile devices or on-chip. The
pursuit of neural networks with fewer parameters draw a
lot of attentions, dating back to many years ago (LeCun,
Denker, and Solla 1990)(Hassibi, Stork, and others 1993).
Although recent advances showed that with a trained network as a warm start, a network can be highly compressed.
But their experiments are mostly done on networks with
large FC layers and many redundant parameters. We will
explore the potential of compressing model weights by directly introducing the sparse regularizer to the loss functions, with a small and compact network, without any warm
start, purely optimizing a regularized function.
For a CNN, denoting an input features map of height h,
width w, and channels ci , as I ∈ Rh×w×ci , the convolutional kernel K is in shape size of s and with co output channels, then K ∈ Rs×s×m×co .
due to the ReLU layers and max-pooling layers, we can calculate the proximal steps based on the subgradient, which is
obtained by back-propagation. Since the weights across different layers are with significantly different statistics, we put
separate regularizer on each layer, with independent threshold and coefficient, to induce sparsity of different degrees.
For neural networks, the data samples are much more than
3D recovery, for the multi-stage algorithm, the local optimal point can not be accessed assuredly, even with a convex
regularizer. Therefore, we proposed a doubly majorizationminimization, which is practical to implement. The algorithm is based on the multi-stage, gradually calibrating the
regularizer into regular `1 regularizers in each stage. While
in each stage, the solver is not required to reach the local optima. The algorithm builds another (stochastic) upper
bounding function g(c, cl,t−1 , St ) for the stage-wise surrogate function L(c) + H l (c), based on the stage-wise initializer point cl,0 and the given subset St . For a smooth objective, g(c, cl,t−1 , St ) can be set to be the following proximal
function,
1 X
g(c, cl,t−1 , St ) =
[L(xn , cl,t−1 )
|St |
n∈St
+ ∇L(xn , cl,t−1 )T (c − cl,t−1 )] +
1
||c − cl,t−1 ||2 .
2η
where St is the selected subset of dataset in the t-th step, and
1/η can be set to the smoothness parameter (if exists). Minimizing the above function can be attained by taking a proximal gradient step, cl,t ← proxH (cl,t−1 − η∇L(xn , cl,t−1 )).
Algorithm 1 (Stochastic) Doubly MM Algorithms
0
0
Input {xn }N
n=1 . Initialize λi = β, l = 0, H = β|c|.
repeat
Update λl+1
as Eq.(4), and set l = l + 1.
i
repeat Solve minc g(c, cl,t−1 , St ) + H l (c) on minibatch Sk using proximal gradient descent.
until Converge
Experiments
Sparse Linear Regression
We implement a sparse linear regression model, for testing the effect of LCNR in inducing sparsity. The dataset
ci X
s X
s
X
is constructed as following, matrix X ∈ RD×N stacks
O(y, x, j) = σ[
K(u, v, i, j)I(y + u − 1, x + v − 1)] N = 1000 random variables of D = 256 dimensions, drew
u
v
i
from a Gaussian distribution, most elements of ground truth
weights w̄ ∈ RD are zero, the others are drew from the
where σ is a nonlinear function like ReLU. We use y to repGaussian distribution, the target vector Y ∈ R1×N is obresent the labels, and denote K as the convolution kernels,
tained by Y = w̄T X plus a Gaussian noise δ. The objective
then the objective function is written as
function is to minimize the 12 ||Y − wT X||2F + H(w), where
N
X
1 X
we set H(w) to leaky capped `1 norm, or regular `1 norm as
L(F(In , K), yn ) +
H(K).
(34)
min
a baseline. We use the multi-stage algorithm, which repeatK N
n=1
edly takes gradient descent step and a proximal step. We set
where L is the loss function, F(In , K) is the output of netthe maximal inner-iterations to be 20 per stage, and 50 stages
work parameterized by K, and H(K) is the LCNR menin total as it converges well. We searched the regularization
tioned earlier. Although the objective is mostly non-smooth
parameters and stepsize that perform best for problem, while
GT
GT
GT
GT
GT
GT
GT
GT
LCNR
LCNR
LCNR
LCNR
LCNR
LCNR
LCNR
LCNR
L1
L1
L1
L1
L1
L1
L1
L1
Capped L1 Capped L1 Capped L1 Capped L1 Capped L1 Capped L1 Capped L1 Capped L1
Figure 2: Performance under different measure. Black: β =
100.0, red: β = 10.0, green: β = 1.0, blue: β = 0.1. (1)
the distance from current estimation to the ground truth
as ||wt − w̄||F , (2) the error of linear regression as ||Y −
X T wt ||F , (3) the ratio of `1 /`2 norm, as ||w||1 /||w||2 , (4)
the nonzero rate as E[I(wit 6= 0)].
not introducing considerable estimation bias, then, we also
test several near parameters by ×1e − 1. For the LCNR, we
set α/β = 300.
We denote wt as the estimated weights in t-th stage. We
measure the performance by four standards. The statistic
numbers change against every stage is plotted in Figure.(2).
As we see from the figure, the proposed model with LCNR
converges to the ground truth with faster speed, achieving
higher accuracy, and yields much sparser solutions than the
`1 norm.
Human 3D Shape Recovery
We conducted the expriments to verify the effectiveness of
leaky capped `1 regularization in learning sparse weights for
3D shape recovery. Our proposed algorithm is implemented
in MATLAB, based on the code generously provided by
(Zhou et al. 2016). We use the CMU motion capture dataset
(moc ) for both training and testing, thousands of frames
of 3D human shapes are contained within the dataset. The
shapes are annotated by 3D locations of 15 landmarks, as
S ∈ R3×15 , and landmarks are at anatomical joints of human, like head, shoulders, elbows, hips, ankles and etc. The
dataset contains various kinds of action. As there are large
external variations across actions, we take each single action into analysis, but using the same shape dictionary. We
use 300 frames of each action as test set. The rest of frames
are used as training set for building shape dictionary. We set
D = 128 to construct an over-complete dictionary by common sparse coding algorithm with `1 regularization, and the
training data are pre-aligned by the Procrustes method used
in (Ramakrishna, Kanade, and Sheikh 2012). The 2D shapes
for test set are synthesized from the ground truth 3D shapes
at different angles across 360 degrees. The recovery error is
measured by the Frobenius norm ||Ŝ − S||F from the recovered 3D shape Ŝ with the ground truth S. We compare
our method to state-of-the-art algorithm (Zhou et al. 2016)
(which has been extensive compared against other methods
in their paper, like Projected Matching Pursuit (Ramakr-
Logrithm
Logrithm
Logrithm
Logrithm
Logrithm
Logrithm
Logrithm
Logrithm
Laplace
Laplace
Laplace
Laplace
Laplace
Laplace
Laplace
Laplace
Figure 3: Recovery results of different kinds of actions, by
using LCNR and other (non)convex regularizations, and the
ground truth shape (GT) on the top row.
ishna, Kanade, and Sheikh 2012) and the alternating manifold minimization method, and proved superiority, therefore we do not compare others). We conducted experiments
comparing the LCNR with other representative (non)convex
regularizations, including ell1 norm, capped ell1 norm, logarithm norm, and Laplace norm, as
(Convex) `1 : R(c; λ) = λ|c|,
capped-`1 : R(c; λ, τ ) = λ min(|c|, τ ),
λ
logarithm : R(c; γ, λ) =
log(γ|c| + 1),
log(γ + 1)
|c|
Laplace : R(c; λ, γ) = λ 1 − exp(− )
γ
We continue to use the doubly MM algorithm to solve the
models, and the constraint on dictionary coefficients c is
transferred to the spectral norm of 3D shapes {Mi }. The
regularization parameters are grid searched for the best final
performance. The computation complexity of calibrating τ
and λli is considerably smaller than the ADMM parts, the
average running time of this part is about 14% of the overall
time of each iteration.
In Figure.(3), we plot the recovered shapes by LCNR regularized and `1 regularized models, and the ground truth
shapes, within a maximum inference iterations of 200. To
test the performance against large noise, we also add matrix [σ ∗ mean(abs(S)) ∗ randn(size(S))] to each 3D shape
S before generating the 2D observation Y . Due to the limited space, we put the results in appendix. The mean errors
for the testing frames of different action types decreasing
against stages are shown in Figure.(4). One can see the proposed model reconstruct much more accurate skeletons than
state-of-the-art model. By comparing the convergence rate
in Figure (4), we see that, the non-convex regularizations
generally converge faster than the `1 because they intro-
6.5
6
5.5
5.5
Error
Error
6
5
5
4.5
4
0
2
4
6
8
4.5
10
0
2
4
walk
6
8
10
6
8
10
run
6
6
5.5
Error
Error
5.5
5
5
4.5
4
0
2
4
6
8
4.5
10
0
2
4
jump
climb
6.5
6.5
6
Error
Error
6
5.5
5
4.5
5.5
5
0
2
4
6
8
4.5
10
0
2
4
box
6
8
10
dance
6
6.5
Leaky capped
L1
capped L1
Logrithm
Laplace
6
Error
Error
5.5
5.5
5
5
4.5
Figure 5: Statistics changing over data passes, and each column shows result of one setting. Red: LCNR regularized
CNN, blue: `1 regularized CNN.
0
2
4
6
8
sit
10
4.5
0
2
4
6
8
10
basketball
Figure 4: Convergence of recovery error with different regularizations. (X-axis: stages (for 10 inner iterations)
duce less estimation bias, so a larger coefficient λ can be
adopted for acceleration. The capped norm induces faster
convergence rate within the beginning 30 iterations, however, in the following iterations the estimation error oscillates up and down, indicating an unstable behavior, this indicates that a very sparse solution doesnot benefit the 3D
recovery problem. The `1 regularization can achieve good
estimation at last, but in the beginning the error decreases
very slow, due to the imbalance between accuracy and speed,
but it outperforms capped `1 , indicating that a certain degree of regularization is critical to larger weights. We can
see for most of the actions, LCNR leads to higher recovery
accuracy comparing opponents, achieveing the same accuracy requirement within much lesser time, this improvement
is significant especially to test phase, which is most the case
since training phase only needs accomplished once.
Sparse Neural Networks
We implement a convolutional neural networks, with 5 convolutional layers of 5 × 5 × 16 and 3 × 3 × 32, three pooling
layers of (2, 2), and a softmax loss layer. We use the CIFAR10 dataset. We compare the proposed LCNR with regular `1 norm regularizer. The training mini-batch size is set to
be 128 per iteration, and set the maximum data passes to be
40 rounds. During each data pass, we calculate the nonzero
rate of model weights, the pure loss function value without
the regularizers, and test the accuracy using the testing set.
For the `1 regularizer, we set parameter to be β = λ0 , and
the parameter of LCNR is set according to α = λ0 ∗ 2.0 and
β = λ0 ∗ 0.1, therefore the penalty on larger weights are sig-
nificantly lighter than smaller ones. We grid search λ0 within
10.0 ∗ 2i for i in range from −8 to 0, obtaining the neural
networks with different sparsity. We use the Adam solver for
optimization. The initial learning rate is set to be 0.02. After
each iteration, we additionally perform the proximal gradient steps xl,t = proxηR (xl,t−1 − η∂L(xl,t−1 ), to ensure the
sparsity of convolutional filters. The proximal gradient steps
are like proxηR (x) = sign(x) max(|x| − ηλ, 0), where
is the element-wise product. We plot the loss function values and sparse rates changing over time in Figure.(5) and
the statistics in the final data pass in Table.(1). We jointly
show the results of two methods in similar sparse rate. We
can see that comparing to the `1 regularizer, the proposed
LCNR achieves better sparsity, without damaging much on
the loss function, and boosting the accuracy by about 2%,
for achieving the same sparsity.
Table 1: Performance Statistics (each column shows result
of one setting).
sparse level
level-1
level-2
level-3
method
LCNR
`1
LCNR
`1
LCNR
`1
accuracy
70.9
68.8
69.2
68.3
55.8
53.2
sparsity
55.2
61.6
24.9
36.2
2.3
2.4
loss
0.40
0.43
67.1
76.0
1.18
1.20
Conclusion
In this paper, we present the leaky capped `1 norm regularizer and its multi-stage optimizer. We apply it in monocular 3D shape recovery problem, obtaining an accuracy improvement and acceleration over state-of-the-art algorithm,
and prove its global convergence, the first rigorous analysis
in relevant literatures and non-convex problems. Auxiliary
empirical studies over sparse linear regression and convolutional neural networks show the LCNR improves upon `1
regularization.
Appendix
6.5
6
6
5.5
5.5
Error
Error
To test the performance against large noise, we also add matrix [σ ∗ mean(abs(S)) ∗ randn(size(S))] to each 3D shape
S before generating the 2D projection. Due to the limited
space, we put the results in Figure 6;7;8;9.
5
5
4.5
4
0
2
4
6
8
4.5
10
0
2
4
walk
GT
GT
GT
GT
GT
LCNR
LCNR
LCNR
LCNR
LCNR
LCNR
6
6
5.5
5.5
0
2
4
6
8
4.5
10
0
2
4
jump
L1
L1
L1
Capped L1
Capped L1 Capped L1 Capped L1
L1
6
Capped L1 Capped L1 Capped L1 Capped L1
Logrithm
Logrithm
Logrithm
Logrithm
Logrithm
8
10
5.5
5
5
4.5
4.5
0
2
4
6
8
10
0
2
4
dance
6
Logrithm
6
6
5.5
box
Logrithm
10
6.5
Error
L1
Error
L1
8
climb
6.5
L1
6
5
LCNR
4.5
L1
10
GT
5
LCNR
8
Error
GT
Error
GT
6
run
6.5
Leaky capped
L1
capped L1
Logarithm
Laplace
Logrithm
6
Error
Error
5.5
5.5
5
Laplace
Laplace
Laplace
Laplace
5
Laplace
Laplace
Laplace
Laplace
4.5
0
2
4
6
sit
Figure 6: Recovery results of different kinds of actions, under noise condition σ = 0.15, by using LCNR and other
(non)convex regularizations, and the ground truth shape
(GT) on the top row.
References
[Boyd et al. 2011] Boyd, S.; Parikh, N.; Chu, E.; Peleato, B.;
and Eckstein, J. 2011. Distributed optimization and statistical learning via the alternating direction method of multipliers. Foundations and Trends R in Machine Learning 3(1):1–
122.
[Chen, Zhou, and Ye 2011] Chen, J.; Zhou, J.; and Ye, J.
2011. Integrating low-rank and group-sparse structures for
robust multi-task learning. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM
SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery
and data mining, 42–50. ACM.
[Cootes et al. 1995] Cootes, T. F.; Taylor, C. J.; Cooper,
D. H.; and Graham, J. 1995. Active shape models-their
training and application. Computer vision and image understanding 61(1):38–59.
[Fan and Li 2011] Fan, J., and Li, R. 2011. Variable selection via nonconcave penalized likelihood and its oracle
properties. Journal of the American Statistical Association
96(456):1348–1360.
[Frank et al. 1993] Frank, I. E.; Friedman, J. H.; Wold, S.;
Hastie, T.; and Mallows, C. 1993. A statistical view of
some chemometrics regression tools. discussion. author’s reply. Technometrics 35(2):109–148.
[Friedman 2012] Friedman, J. H. 2012. Fast sparse regression and classification. International Journal of Forecasting
28(3):722–738.
8
10
4.5
0
2
4
6
8
10
basketball
Figure 7: Convergence of recovery error under σ = 0.05
noise, with different regularizations. (X-axis: stages (for 10
inner iterations)
[Gao et al. 2015] Gao, H.; Nie, F.; Cai, W.; and Huang, H.
2015. Robust capped norm nonnegative matrix factorization: Capped norm nmf. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM
International on Conference on Information and Knowledge
Management, 871–880. ACM.
[Gong, Ye, and Zhang 2012] Gong, P.; Ye, J.; and Zhang, C.s. 2012. Multi-stage multi-task feature learning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 1988–
1996.
[Han and Zhang 2016] Han, L., and Zhang, Y. 2016. Multistage multi-task learning with reduced rank. In AAAI, 1638–
1644.
[Hassibi, Stork, and others 1993] Hassibi, B.; Stork, D. G.;
et al. 1993. Second order derivatives for network pruning: Optimal brain surgeon. Advances in neural information
processing systems 164–164.
[Hejrati and Ramanan 2012] Hejrati, M., and Ramanan, D.
2012. Analyzing 3d objects in cluttered images. In Advances
in Neural Information Processing Systems, 593–601.
[Hunter and Lange 2004] Hunter, D. R., and Lange, K. 2004.
A tutorial on mm algorithms. The American Statistician
58(1):30–37.
[Jiang, Nie, and Huang 2015] Jiang, W.; Nie, F.; and Huang,
H. 2015. Robust dictionary learning with capped l1-norm.
In IJCAI, 3590–3596.
[Journée et al. 2010] Journée, M.; Nesterov, Y.; Richtárik, P.;
and Sepulchre, R. 2010. Generalized power method for
6.5
6
6.5
6
5.8
6
5
Error
Error
6
Error
Error
5.5
5.5
5.5
5
2
4
6
8
4.5
10
0
2
4
walk
6
8
5
10
0
2
4
run
6
Error
Error
Error
5.5
5
6
8
5
10
5
0
2
4
6
8
10
0
2
4
jump
6
6
5.8
5.8
5.6
5.6
5.4
6
8
5
4
10
6
8
10
6
8
10
6
8
10
5.4
5.2
0
2
4
climb
6.5
2
run
5.2
4.5
0
walk
6
5.5
4.5
5.4
5.2
0
Error
4.5
5.6
6
8
5
10
0
2
4
jump
climb
6.5
6.5
6.5
6
6
6
5.5
Error
Error
Error
Error
6
5.5
5.5
5.5
5
2
4
6
8
5
10
0
2
4
box
6
8
5
10
0
2
4
dance
6
6.5
5.5
Error
8
5.5
2
4
6
sit
8
10
4
Leaky capped
L1
capped L1
Logarithm
Laplace
6
5
0
2
6.2
5
4.5
0
dance
5.5
5
4.5
5
10
6
Leaky capped
L1
capped L1
Logarithm
Laplace
6
Error
6
box
Error
0
Error
4.5
5.8
5.6
5.4
0
2
4
6
8
10
basketball
4.5
0
2
4
6
sit
8
10
5.2
0
2
4
6
8
10
basketball
Figure 8: Convergence of recovery error under σ = 0.15
noise, with different regularizations. (X-axis: stages (for 10
inner iterations)
Figure 9: Convergence of recovery error under σ = 0.25
noise, with different regularizations. (X-axis: stages (for 10
inner iterations)
sparse principal component analysis. Journal of Machine
Learning Research 11(Feb):517–553.
[LeCun, Denker, and Solla 1990] LeCun, Y.; Denker, J. S.;
and Solla, S. A. 1990. Optimal brain damage. In Advances
in neural information processing systems, 598–605.
[Lin et al. 2014] Lin, Y.-L.; Morariu, V. I.; Hsu, W.; and
Davis, L. S. 2014. Jointly optimizing 3d model fitting
and fine-grained classification. In European Conference on
Computer Vision, 466–480. Springer.
[Lounici et al. 2009] Lounici, K.; Pontil, M.; Tsybakov,
A. B.; and De Geer, S. V. 2009. Taking advantage of sparsity
in multi-task learning.
[moc ] Mocap: Carnegie mellon university motion capture
database. http://mocap.cs.cmu.edu.
[Parikh, Boyd, and others 2014] Parikh, N.; Boyd, S. P.; et al.
2014. Proximal algorithms. Foundations and Trends in optimization 1(3):127–239.
[Ramakrishna, Kanade, and Sheikh 2012] Ramakrishna, V.;
Kanade, T.; and Sheikh, Y. 2012. Reconstructing 3d human
pose from 2d image landmarks. In European Conference on
Computer Vision, 573–586. Springer.
[Sun, Xiang, and Ye 2013] Sun, Q.; Xiang, S.; and Ye, J.
2013. Robust principal component analysis via capped
norms. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining,
311–319. ACM.
[Tang, Nie, and Jain 2016] Tang, M.; Nie, F.; and Jain, R.
2016. Capped lp-norm graph embedding for photo clustering. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on Multimedia Conference, 431–435. ACM.
[Wang et al. 2014] Wang, C.; Wang, Y.; Lin, Z.; Yuille, A. L.;
and Gao, W. 2014. Robust estimation of 3d human poses
from a single image. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference
on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2361–2368.
[Xiang and Savarese 2012] Xiang, Y., and Savarese, S. 2012.
Estimating the aspect layout of object categories. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2012 IEEE
Conference on, 3410–3417. IEEE.
[Zhang and others 2013] Zhang, T., et al. 2013. Multistage convex relaxation for feature selection. Bernoulli
19(5B):2277–2293.
[Zhang 2010a] Zhang, C. 2010a. Nearly unbiased variable
selection under minimax concave penalty. Annals of Statistics 38(2):894–942.
[Zhang 2010b] Zhang, T. 2010b. Analysis of multi-stage
convex relaxation for sparse regularization. Journal of Machine Learning Research 11(Mar):1081–1107.
[Zhou et al. 2016] Zhou, X.; Zhu, M.; Leonardos, S.; and
Daniilidis, K. 2016. Sparse representation for 3d shape estimation: a convex relaxation approach. IEEE Transactions
on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.
[Zia et al. 2013] Zia, M. Z.; Stark, M.; Schiele, B.; and
Schindler, K. 2013. Detailed 3d representations for object recognition and modeling. IEEE transactions on pattern
analysis and machine intelligence 35(11):2608–2623.
| 2cs.AI
|
THE SUBGROUP IDENTIFICATION PROBLEM FOR
FINITELY PRESENTED GROUPS
arXiv:1109.1792v4 [math.GR] 19 Oct 2016
MAURICE CHIODO
Abstract. We introduce the subgroup identification problem, and show
that there is a finitely presented group G for which it is unsolvable, and
that it is uniformly solvable in the class of finitely presented locally Hopfian
groups. This is done as an investigation into the difference between strong
and weak effective coherence for finitely presented groups.
1. Introduction
Decision problems for finitely presented groups are well-studied, going back
to the work of Dehn [8] in 1911. The word problem, of deciding when a word
represents the trivial element in a group, was the first of these to be well understood, with the independent work of Boone, Britton and Novikov [3, 5, 17]. A
clever adaption of this problem by the independent work of Adian and Rabin
[1, 18] gives rise to the impossibility of the isomorphism problem, of deciding
if two finite presentations describe isomorphic groups. To list all major results
in group-theoretic decision problems would be a substantial undertaking, and
we defer to [16] for an excellent introduction and survey of the discipline up to
1992.
For the remainder of this section we write X ∗ to denote all finite words on
a set X, P to denote the group given by a presentation P , and ⟨w1 , . . . , wn ⟩P
to denote the subgroup in P generated by words w1 , . . . , wn (see section 2.1 for
a clarification of this notation if required).
We introduce the following problem, and give the main result of this work.
Definition 1.1. We say that the subgroup identification problem for a finite
presentation P = ⟨X∣R⟩ is solvable if there is a partial algorithm that, on input
of any finite set of words w1 , . . . , wn ∈ X ∗ , and any finite presentation Q = ⟨Y ∣S⟩,
outputs (if the subgroup ⟨w1 , . . . , wn ⟩P ≅ Q) an explicit set map φ from Y to
{w1 , . . . , wn }∗ which extends to an isomorphism φ ∶ Q → ⟨w1 , . . . , wn ⟩P . That is,
the induced homomorphism φ ∶ Q → P is injective, and Im(φ) = ⟨w1 , . . . , wn ⟩P .
Otherwise, we place no conditions on the output, or even whether it halts.
Theorem 4.6. There is a finitely presented group with unsolvable subgroup
identification problem.
2010 AMS Classification: 20F10, 03D40, 03D80.
Keywords: Effectively coherent groups, subgroup identification problem, decidability.
The author was supported by:
An Australian Postgraduate Award, and a David Hay Postgraduate Writing-Up Award.
Date: October 20, 2016.
1
2
MAURICE CHIODO
As a consequence of lemma 2.6, having solvable subgroup identification problem depends only on the isomorphism class of a finite presentation.
In [9, Definition 1.1] a finitely generated group G is said to be effectively
coherent if it is coherent (all of its finitely generated subgroups are finitely
presentable) and there is an algorithm for G that, on input of a finite collection
of words S, outputs a finite presentation for the subgroup generated by S. This
motivates us to make the following two definitions:
Definition 1.2. We say a coherent group G = ⟨X∣R⟩ is weakly effectively coherent if there is an algorithm for G that, on input of a finite collection of words
S ⊂ X ∗ , outputs a finite presentation for the subgroup ⟨S⟩G generated by S.
Definition 1.3. We say a coherent group G = ⟨X∣R⟩ is strongly effectively
coherent if there is an algorithm for G that, on input of a finite collection of
words S ⊂ X ∗ , outputs a finite presentation P = ⟨Y ∣V ⟩ for the subgroup ⟨S⟩G
generated by S, along with a map φ ∶ Y → X ∗ which extends to an injection
φ ∶ P → G whose image is ⟨S⟩G .
By definition, strongly effectively coherent groups are weakly effectively coherent. Conversely, it is imediate that the notions of strong and weak effective
coherence are equivalent in groups with solvable subgroup identification problem. A motivating (unresolved) question for this work is whether strong and
weak effective coherence are equivalent notions for all finitely presented groups.
The subgroup identification problem was formulated after the author read
the proof of [9, Lemma 1.2] and [9, Remark 1.3] where, were it not for a later
typographical correction provided in [10, Definition 1.2], it would suggest that
the subgroup identification problem is (uniformly) solvable over all finitely presented groups. This would, in turn, imply that weak and strong effective coherence are equivalent notions. The groups encountered in [9] all have solvable
subgroup identification problem, as they are all locally Hopfian (see theorem 3.8
below). In addition, for all results shown in [9] all weakly effectively coherent
groups are actually proven to be strongly effectively coherent, so combined with
the typographical correction from [10, Definition 1.2] this then becomes a moot
point. We do not suggest that there are any errors with the main conclusions of
[9]. However, [9, Lemma 1.2 and Remark 1.3] do raise an interesting question
regarding the connection between strong and weak effective coherence.
An application of standard techniques gives the following result, which should
be read very carefully as one could misinterpret it as showing that the subgroup
identification problem is uniformly solvable for all finitely presented groups.
Proposition 3.5. There is a uniform partial algorithm that, on input of: A finite presentation P = ⟨X∣R⟩ of a group, and a finite set of words w1 , . . . , wn ∈ X ∗
such that ⟨w1 , . . . , wn ⟩P is finitely presentable, and Q = ⟨Y ∣S⟩ a finite presentation such that Q ≅ ⟨w1 , . . . , wn ⟩P ;
Outputs: A finite set of words c1 , . . . , ck ∈ {w1 , . . . , wn }∗ such that each ci is
trivial in P (when viewed as a word in X ∗ ) and ⟨w1 , . . . , wn ∣c1 , . . . , ck ⟩ is isomorphic to Q and hence also to ⟨w1 , . . . , wn ⟩P .
THE SUBGROUP IDENTIFICATION PROBLEM FOR FINITELY PRESENTED GROUPS 3
A group G is Hopfian if every surjective endomorphism of G is an isomorphism, and locally Hopfian if every finitely generated subgroup is Hopfian.
Theorem 3.8. The subgroup identification problem is uniformly solvable in the
class of finitely presented locally Hopfian groups. Hence, in this class of groups,
weak effective coherence is equivalent to strong effective coherence.
Thus the notions of weak and strong effective coherence are equivalent in
the class of locally Hopfian groups, and are so because in this class the subgroup identification problem is uniformly solvable. However, as soon as we start
dealing with non-Hopfian groups, the situation is a lot different.
The following theorem, and subsequent lemma, are vital to our main result.
They show that a solution to the word problem for a finite presentation cannot
be uniformly lifted to a solution to the word problem for a recursive presentation isomorphic to that same group (so an isomosphism between the two cannot
be constructed). This contrasts the case of having a pair of isomorphic finite
presentations, where an isomorphism can be uniformly constructed (lemma 2.6).
Theorem 4.1. There is a finite presentation P of a group with solvable word
problem (namely, the Baumslag-Solitar group BS(2, 3)) for which there is no
partial algorithm that, on input of a recursive presentation Q such that P ≅ Q,
outputs a solution to the word problem for Q.
Lemma 4.2. There is a finite presentation P = ⟨X∣R⟩ of a group with solvable
word problem (namely, BS(2, 3)) for which there is no partial algorithm that,
on input of a recursive presentation Q = ⟨Y ∣S⟩ such that P ≅ Q, outputs a set
map φ ∶ X → Y ∗ which extends to an isomorphism φ ∶ P → Q.
By viewing isomorphisms between groups as Tietze transformations rather
than set maps (see [13, §1.5] for a full exposition of this concept), we can reinterpret lemma 4.2 in the following way.
Lemma 4.4. There is a finite presentation P of a group with solvable word
problem (namely, BS(2, 3)) for which there is no algorithm that, on input of
a recursive presentation Q such that P ≅ Q, outputs a recursive enumeration
of Tietze transformations of type (T 1) and (T 2) (manipulation of relators),
and a finite set of Tietze transformations of type (T 3) and (T 4) (addition and
removal of generators), with notation as per [13, §1.5], transforming P to Q.
A direct consequence of the Higman embedding theorem [11, Theorem 1] is
that any recursively presented group can be uniformly embedded into a finitely
presented group. By a careful application of this result, paying special attention to the uniformity in which such a finite presentation is constructed as
given in the proof of [20, Theorem 12.18], our main result (theorem 4.6) follows.
4
MAURICE CHIODO
Acknowledgements: The author would like to thank Jack Button and Andrew Glass for their general advice, and Chuck Miller for giving general comments and corrections as well as pointing out a more elegant proof of lemma
3.6 and a much more direct proof of theorem 4.6. Thanks also go to Nicholas
Touikan for his helpful suggestions for a revised version of this work, and to
Daniel Groves and Henry Wilton for explaining their work in [9].
2. Preliminaries
2.1. Standard notation. With the convention that N contains 0, we take
ϕm to be the mth partial recursive function ϕm ∶ N → N, and the mth partial
recursive set (r.e. set) Wm as the domain of ϕm . If P = ⟨X∣R⟩ is a group
presentation with generating set X and relators R, then we denote by P the
group presented by P . A presentation P = ⟨X∣R⟩ is said to be a recursive
presentation if X is a finite set and R is a recursive enumeration of relators;
P is said to be an infinite recursive presentation if instead X is a recursive
enumeration of generators. A group G is said to be finitely presentable if G ≅ P
for some finite presentation P . If P, Q are group presentations then we denote
their free product presentation by P ∗ Q, given by taking the disjoint union
of their generators and relators; this extends to the free product of arbitrary
collections of presentations. If X is a set, then we denote by X −1 a set of
the same cardinality as X along with a fixed bijection φ ∶ X → X −1 , where
we denote x−1 ∶= φ(x). We write X ∗ for the set of finite words on X ∪ X −1 ,
including the empty word ∅. If g1 , . . . , gn are a collection of elements of a
group G, then we write ⟨g1 , . . . , gn ⟩G for the subgroup in G generated by these
elements, and ⟪g1 , . . . , gn ⟫G for the normal closure of these elements in G. A
group G is Hopfian if every surjective endomorphism of G is an isomorphism,
and locally Hopfian if every finitely generated subgroup is Hopfian. Finally, the
commutator [x, y] is taken to be xyx−1 y −1 .
2.2. Groups. It is a result by Mihailova [14] that there exists a finitely presented group with solvable word problem for which the subgroup membership
problem, of deciding when a word on the generators lies in a given finitely generated subgroup, is unsolvable. We mention this in the context of the following
known result about the word problem for HNN extensions of groups.
Lemma 2.1. Let H, K ⩽ G be isomorphic finitely generated subgroups of G,
each having solvable subgroup membership problem in G. Let ϕ ∶ H → K be an
isomorphism. Then the HNN extension G∗ϕ has solvable word problem.
Proof. This is immediate from the normal form theorem for HNN extensions
(see [12, §IV Theorem 2.1]).
The following group construction from [2] plays an important part in our
arguments, as it is an explicit example of a finitely presented non-Hopfian group
with solvable word problem.
Definition 2.2. The Baumslag-Solitar groups BS(m, n) are defined via the
following finite presentations, each an HNN extension of Z:
BS(m, n) ∶= ⟨s, t∣s−1 tm s = tn ⟩
THE SUBGROUP IDENTIFICATION PROBLEM FOR FINITELY PRESENTED GROUPS 5
Theorem 2.3 (Baumslag-Solitar [2, Theorem 1]). The group BS(2, 3) is nonHopfian and has solvable word problem. The map f ∶ BS(2, 3) → BS(2, 3) given
by extending the map f ∶ {s, t} → {s, t}∗ , f (s) = s, f (t) = t2 , is a non-injective
epimorphism. The word [s−1 ts, t] is non-trivial in BS(2, 3) and lies in ker(f ).
Proof. That BS(2, 3) has solvable word problem comes from the fact that it is
an HNN extension of Z (see lemma 2.1, or alternatively a result by Magnus in
[12, § IV Theorem 5.3] that all 1-relator groups have solvable word problem).
The remainder of the theorem is proved in [2, Theorem 1].
2.3. Enumerable processes in groups. We note some partial algorithms
and recursively enumerable sets, in the context of group presentations. These
are standard results, which we state (without proof) for the convenience of any
reader not familiar with the area.
Lemma 2.4. Let P = ⟨X∣R⟩ be a recursive presentation. Then the words in
X ∗ which represent the identity in P are recursively enumerable. Moreover,
this algorithm is uniform over all recursive presentations.
Lemma 2.5. There is a partial algorithm that, on input of two finite presentations P = ⟨X∣R⟩ and Q = ⟨Y ∣S⟩, and a set map φ ∶ X → Y ∗ , halts if and only
if φ extends to a homomorphism φ ∶ P → Q.
Lemma 2.6. There is a partial algorithm that, on input of two finite presentations P = ⟨X∣R⟩ and Q = ⟨Y ∣S⟩, halts if and only if P ≅ Q, and outputs an
isomorphism between them.
It is important to note that lemma 2.6 does not hold if we instead consider
recursive presentations. In fact, even if we start with one recursive presentation,
and one finite presentation, the lemma does not hold; we show this later as
lemma 4.2.
Lemma 2.7. Let P = ⟨X∣R⟩ be a finite presentation. Then the set of finite presentations defining groups isomorphic to P is recursively enumerable. Moreover,
this enumeration algorithm is uniform over all finite presentations.
3. Initial questions and observations
3.1. The finite presentation problem. Following [4, Definition 1.1], we say
that the finite presentation problem for a finitely presented group ⟨X∣R⟩ is
solvable if there is a partial algorithm that, on input of a finite set of words
w1 , . . . , wn ∈ X ∗ such that ⟨w1 , . . . , wn ⟩P is finitely presentable, outputs a finite
presentation Q for ⟨w1 , . . . , wn ⟩P . By definition, a finitely presented weakly effectively coherent group has solvable finite presentation problem. The existence
of a finitely presented group with unsolvable word problem immediately gives
rise to the following obsevation:
Lemma 3.1. There is a finite presentation P = ⟨X∣R⟩ of a group for which the
finite presentation problem is unsolvable.
6
MAURICE CHIODO
Proof. Take P = ⟨X∣R⟩ to be a finite presentation of a group with unsolvable
word problem (see [20, Lemma 12.7]), and suppose this has an algorithm to
solve the finite presentation problem. Note that for any word w ∈ X ∗ , we have
that ⟨w⟩P is cyclic, and hence finitely presentable. So, on input of a single word
w, the algorithm will output a finite presentation Q of the cyclic group ⟨w⟩P .
But the isomorphism problem for finitely presented abelian groups is solvable
(see [16] p. 31), so we can decide if Q is trivial, and hence if w is trivial in P ,
which is impossible since P has unsolvable word problem.
Remark. As pointed out to the author by Chuck Miller, the work of Collins in [7]
shows that the group in lemma 3.1 can be taken to have solvable word problem.
This is because such an algorithm for the finite presentation problem would
explicitly solve the order problem, of deciding what the order of an element of
the group is, and a direct consequence of [7, Theorem A] is that there is a finitely
presented group with solvable word problem and unsolvable order problem.
Bridson and Wilton [4] give an in-depth analysis of the finite presentation
problem, showing that it is not uniformly solvable in several classes of finitely
presented groups [4, Corollary C]. Moreover, they construct a finite presentation
of a group with polynomial Dehn function (and hence solvable word problem)
which has unsolvable finite presentation problem [4, Theorem E].
Having seen that the finite presentation problem is unsolvable in general, we
shift our attention to similar questions. By considering the trivial group, and
the fact that the triviality problem is undecidable, one can show that there is
no algorithm that, given two finite presentations P, Q, determines if P embeds
in Q or not. The following two stronger results were obtained in [6], and are
closely related to the subgroup identification problem.
Theorem 3.2 (Chiodo [6, Theorem 6.8]). There is a finitely presented group
G such that the set of finite presentations of groups which embed into G is not
recursively enumerable.
Theorem 3.3 (Chiodo [6, Theorem 6.6]). There is no algorithm that, on input
of two finite presentations P = ⟨X∣R⟩, Q = ⟨Y ∣S⟩ such that P embeds in Q,
outputs an explicit map φ ∶ X → Y ∗ which extends to an embedding φ ∶ P ↪ Q.
In the proof of theorem 3.3, as found in [6], we see that the algorithmic
problem arises from not definitely knowing a set of target words for an injection
from P into Q. Knowing which elements P maps to in Q brings us precisely to
the subgroup identification problem.
3.2. The subgroup identification problem for Hopfian groups. The following is a standard result about finitely presentable groups.
Lemma 3.4. Let ⟨X∣R⟩ be a recursive presentation of a finitely presentable
group. Then there is a finite subset R′ ⊆ R such that ⟨X∣R⟩ ≅ ⟨X∣R′ ⟩ via
extention of the identity map on X. That is, there is a finite truncation R′ of
R such that all other relations are a consequence of the first R′ .
THE SUBGROUP IDENTIFICATION PROBLEM FOR FINITELY PRESENTED GROUPS 7
The following result could lead us to think that all finitely presented groups
have solvable subgroup identification problem, and we urge the reader to study
this carefully to become convinced that it is not what is proved.
Proposition 3.5. There is a uniform partial algorithm that, on input of: A finite presentation P = ⟨X∣R⟩ of a group, and a finite set of words w1 , . . . , wn ∈ X ∗
such that ⟨w1 , . . . , wn ⟩P is finitely presentable, and Q = ⟨Y ∣S⟩ a finite presentation such that Q ≅ ⟨w1 , . . . , wn ⟩P ;
Outputs: A finite set of words c1 , . . . , ck ∈ {w1 , . . . , wn }∗ such that each ci is
trivial in P (when viewed as a word in X ∗ ) and ⟨w1 , . . . , wn ∣c1 , . . . , ck ⟩ is isomorphic to Q and hence also to ⟨w1 , . . . , wn ⟩P .
Proof. Begin an enumeration c1 , c2 , . . . of all words in the {w1 , . . . , wn }∗ which
are trivial in P (when viewed as words in X ∗ ); this can be done by repeated application of lemma 2.4. Define the presentation Pl ∶= ⟨w1 , . . . , wn ∣c1 , . . . , cl ⟩. By
lemma 3.4, as ⟨w1 , . . . , wn ⟩P is finitely presentable, and T ∶= ⟨w1 , . . . , wn ∣c1 , c2 , . . .⟩
is a recursive presentation of a group isomorphic to ⟨w1 , . . . , wn ⟩P via extension
of the map wi ↦ wi , there exists some finite m such that P m ≅ T (again via
extension of the map wi ↦ wi ). That is, using lemma 3.4 we can truncate the
relations of T at position m (forming Pm ) such that all successive relations are
consequences of the first m (note that selecting m is not an algorithmic process;
for the moment we merely appeal to the fact that such an m exists). So we have
Q ≅ ⟨w1 , . . . , wn ⟩P ≅ T ≅ P m , where Q is our given explicit finite presentation.
Now we use lemma 2.6 to begin checking for an isomorphism between Q and
P 1 , P 2 , . . . as a parallel process. Eventually this process will stop at some k
(perhaps different from m) such that P k ≅ T ≅ Q.
Note that we were very careful to mention that the selection of m in the above
proof was existential, but not necessarily recursive. This is very important, as
later in corollary 4.3 we construct a class of recursive presentations for which
the selection of such an m is provably non-recursive.
Remark. With the above proof in mind, one would naively hope that the map
from Pk = ⟨w1 , . . . , wn ∣c1 , . . . , ck ⟩ to P = ⟨X∣R⟩ given by extending wi ↦ wi ∈ X ∗
would be an injection onto its image ⟨w1 , . . . , wn ⟩P ; in the case that P k is
Hopfian this would indeed be true, as shown later in in lemma 3.7. But theorem
4.6 shows that this is not true in general.
The existence of a finitely presented non-Hopfian group, combined with
lemma 3.4, immediately gives rise to the following:
Lemma 3.6. There exist finite presentations P = ⟨x1 , . . . , xn ∣r1 , . . . , rm ⟩ and
Q = ⟨x1 , . . . , xn ∣r1 , . . . , rm , s1 , . . . , sk ⟩, along with a recursive presentation T =
⟨x1 , . . . , xn ∣r1 , r2 , . . .⟩ (where ri are the same in P, Q, T for all i ≤ m) such that:
1. P ≅ Q ≅ T (and hence T is finitely presentable).
2. The quotient maps φ ∶ P → Q and ψ ∶ P → T , each an extension of the map
xi ↦ xi , are not isomorphisms.
8
MAURICE CHIODO
Observe that the above quotient maps are always isomorphisms in the case of
Hopfian groups, by very definition. The point of making the above observation
is to stress the following:
1. There may be many ways to truncate the relators of T to get a presentation
of a group isomorphic to P .
2. Truncating T to get a finite presentation T ′ with T ′ ≅ T may not give
a presentation which is isomorphic to P via the quotient map we have been
discussing.
Lemma 3.7. Let P , Pk and {w1 , . . . , wn } be as in the proof of proposition 3.5.
If ⟨w1 , . . . , wn ⟩P is Hopfian, then the map φ ∶ {w1 , . . . , wn } → X ∗ sending wi
(as a generator of Pk ) to wi (as a word in X ∗ ) extends to a monomorphism
φ ∶ P k ↪ P , and thus to an isomorphism to its image ⟨w1 , . . . , wn ⟩P .
Proof. By the proof of proposition 3.5, we know that φ extends to a surjection
φ ∶ P k ↠ ⟨w1 , . . . , wn ⟩P . But P k ≅ ⟨w1 , . . . , wn ⟩P , which is Hopfian. Hence φ
must be injective, and thus an isomorphism.
Theorem 3.8. The subgroup identification problem is uniformly solvable in the
class of finitely presented locally Hopfian groups. Hence, in this class of groups,
weak effective coherence is equivalent to strong effective coherence.
Proof. The first part follows from lemma 3.7; the second is then immediate.
4. Main results
We begin by making the important observation that a solution to the word
problem can’t be algorithmically lifted from a finite presentation of BS(2, 3) to
a recursive presentation of BS(2, 3).
Theorem 4.1. There is a finite presentation P of a group with solvable word
problem (namely, BS(2, 3)) for which there is no partial algorithm that, on input
of a recursive presentation Q such that P ≅ Q, outputs a solution to the word
problem for Q.
Proof. Assume we have such an algorithm. Take P = ⟨X∣R⟩ to be a finite
presentation for BS(2, 3). Fix Q = ⟨X∣R∪S⟩ to be a finite presentation of a nontrivial quotient which is isomorphic to P , but not by the extension IdX of the
map IdX ∶ X → X (say, instead, by the extension φ of the map φ ∶ X → X ∗ ). Fix
a word w ∈ X ∗ such that w lies in the kernel of φ, but is not trivial in BS(2, 3).
Given any r.e. set Wi , we form the recursive presentation Pi,j ∶= ⟨X∣R (∪S if j ∈
Wi ) ⟩. That is, Pi,j ∶= ⟨X∣R⟩ if j ∉ Wi , and Pi,j ∶= ⟨X∣R ∪ S⟩ if j ∈ Wi . So Pi,j
is a recursive presentation (we add all the relators S to Q if we see j ∈ Wi ).
Now use our assumed algorithm that solves the word problem in Pi,j to test
if φ(w) = e in P i,j ; this will occur if and only if j ∈ Wi . By taking Wi to be
non-recursive, we derive a contradiction.
Note. The above proof is not the original proof as developed by the author, but
a simplified version due to Chuck Miller which follows from lemma 3.6 of this
work. The author is grateful to Chuck for this simplification.
THE SUBGROUP IDENTIFICATION PROBLEM FOR FINITELY PRESENTED GROUPS 9
Lemma 4.2. There is a finite presentation P = ⟨X∣R⟩ of a group with solvable
word problem (namely, BS(2, 3)) for which there is no partial algorithm that,
on input of a recursive presentation Q = ⟨Y ∣S⟩ such that P ≅ Q, outputs a set
map φ ∶ X → Y ∗ which extends to an isomorphism φ ∶ P → Q.
Proof. Suppose such an algorithm exists. Given a recursive presentation Q =
⟨Y ∣S⟩ such that P ≅ Q, use our supposed algorithm to output a set map φ ∶
X → Y ∗ which extends to an isomorphism φ ∶ P → Q. But since we have a
solution to the word problem for P , we can combine this with the map φ to get
a solution to the word problem for Q, thus contradicting theorem 4.1.
Note that, by lemma 3.4, in the above proof there will always be a finite
subset S ′ of S such that all other relators are consequences of S ′ , and hence
⟨Y ∣S⟩ ≅ ⟨Y ∣S ′ ⟩. So we have the following immediate corollary:
Corollary 4.3. There is a finite presentation P = ⟨X∣R⟩ of a group with solvable word problem (namely, BS(2, 3)) for which there is no partial algorithm
that, on input of a recursive presentation Q = ⟨Y ∣S⟩ such that P ≅ Q, outputs
a finite subset S ′ ⊆ S such that all other relators S ∖ S ′ are consequences of S ′ .
Equivalently, construction of a finite truncation point m of S (with m as in the
proof of proposition 3.5) is not algorithmically possible in general.
As an aside, if we were instead to view isomorphisms between groups as
Tietze transformations rather than set maps (see [13, §1.5] for a full exposition
of this concept) then we can interpret lemma 4.2 in the following way.
Lemma 4.4. There is a finite presentation P of a group with solvable word
problem (namely, BS(2, 3)) for which there is no algorithm that, on input of
a recursive presentation Q such that P ≅ Q, outputs a recursive enumeration
of Tietze transformations of type (T 1) and (T 2) (manipulation of relators),
and a finite set of Tietze transformations of type (T 3) and (T 4) (addition and
removal of generators), with notation as per [13, §1.5], transforming P to Q.
Remark. It should be pointed out that such a sequence of Tietze transformations
as described above will always exist, which follows directly from lemma 3.4; we
merely truncate the relators of Q to get a finite presentation Q′ , perform a
finite sequence of Tietze transformations which takes P to Q′ (possible by [13,
Corollary 1.5]), and then add the rest of the enumeration of relators of Q to Q′ .
The point here is that we cannot compute an enumeration of such a sequence
in general.
Before proceeding to our main result, we note the following lemma which
shows that the direction in which we define our isomorphism in lemma 4.2 is
inconsequential.
Lemma 4.5. Using the notation of lemma 4.2, having an explicit set map
φ ∶ X → Y ∗ which extends to an isomorphism φ allows us to construct a set map
ψ ∶ Y → X ∗ which extends to the inverse of φ (and hence is an isomorphism).
The reverse also holds.
10
MAURICE CHIODO
Proof. This follows from the fact that we only deal with recursive presentations, and we can uniformly enumerate all trivial words of such presentations
by lemma 2.4.
We now have all the technical machinery required to prove our main result:
Theorem 4.6. There is a finitely presented group with unsolvable subgroup
identification problem.
Note that, by theorem 3.8, such a group cannot be locally Hopfian.
Proof. Take a recursive enumeration Pi ∶= ⟨Xi ∣Ri ⟩ of all recursive presentations
of groups (fix some countably infinite alphabet A; each Xi is a finite subset of
A, and each Ri is a recursive enumeration of words in Xi∗ ). By the Higman
embedding theorem (see [20, Theorem 12.18]) we can embed their free product
(with presentation P1 ∗P2 ∗. . .) into a finitely presented group with presentation
P = ⟨X∣R⟩. Then the group P does not have solvable subgroup identification
problem, for if it did then we could use this to contradict lemma 4.2 as follows:
By the uniformity of Higman’s result, as described in the proof of [20, Theorem
12.18], there is a uniform procedure that, for any i, outputs a finite set of
words Si ⊂ X ∗ in 1-1 correspondence with Xi such that the subgroup ⟨Si ⟩P
is isomorphic to P i , and an explicit bijection φi ∶ Xi → Si which extends to
an isomorphism φi ∶ Pi → ⟨Si ⟩P . That is, we can keep track of where each
P i is sent in this embedding. So, given a recursive presentation Q = ⟨Y ∣S⟩
and a finite presentation H = ⟨Z∣V ⟩ such that H ≅ Q, compute j such that
Pj = Q as recursive presentations (that is, number all Turing machines which
read alphabet Y , and look for one identical to the description S). We know that
H ≅ ⟨Sj ⟩P . So use our algorithm to output a set map ψ ∶ Z → Sj∗ which extends
to an isomorphism ψ ∶ H → ⟨Sj ⟩P . But we can compose ψ with φ−1
j to get the
∗
−1
set map φ−1
j ○ ψ ∶ Z → Y which extends to an isomorphism φj ○ ψ ∶ H → Q.
But this is impossible by lemma 4.2, so our assumed algorithm can’t exist.
5. Further work
The group G constructed in theorem 4.6 contains an embedded copy of every
recursively presented group, and so is not coherent, let alone weakly effectively
coherent. We ask the question of whether theorem 4.6 can be modified so that
G is weakly effectively coherent, or even merely coherent. Either of these would
help make the result even more relevant, as we conjecture that strong and weak
effective coherence are not equivalent properties for finitely presented groups.
References
[1] S. I. Adian, Finitely presented groups and algorithms, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 117, 9–12
(1957).
[2] G. Baumslag, D. Solitar, Some two generator one-relator non-Hopfian groups, Bull. Amer.
Math. Soc. 68, 199–201 (1962).
[3] W. W. Boone, The word problem, Ann. of Math., 70, 207–265 (1959).
[4] M. Bridson, H. Wilton, On the difficulty of presenting finitely presentable groups, Groups
Geom. Dyn. 5, 301–325 (2011).
THE SUBGROUP IDENTIFICATION PROBLEM FOR FINITELY PRESENTED GROUPS11
[5] J. L. Britton, The word problem for groups, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 8, 493–506
(1958).
[6] M. Chiodo, Finding non-trivial elements and splittings in groups, J. Algebra. 331, 271–
284 (2011).
[7] D. J. Collins, The word, power and order problems in finitely presented groups, in Word
Problems, eds. Boone, Cannonito, and Lyndon, Amsterdam, North-Holland, 401–420
(1973).
[8] M. Dehn, Über unendliche diskontinuerliche Gruppen (German), Math. Ann. 69, 116–144
(1911).
[9] D. Groves, H. Wilton, Enumerating limit groups, Groups Geom. Dyn. 3, 389–399 (2009).
[10] D. Groves, H. Wilton, Enumerating limit groups: A Corrigendum, arXiv:1112.1223v1
(2011).
[11] G. Higman, Subgroups of finitely presented groups, Proc. Royal Soc. London Ser. A 262,
455–475 (1961).
[12] R. Lyndon, P. Schupp, Combinatorial Group Theory, Springer (2001).
[13] W. Magnus, A. Karrass, D. Solitar, Combinatorial group theory, Dover (2004).
[14] K. A. Mihailova, The occurrence problem for direct products of groups, Dokl. Akad. Nauk
SSSR 119, 1103–1105 (1958).
[15] C. F. Miller III, On group theoretic decision problems and their classification, Annals of
Math. Study 68, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ (1971).
[16] C.F. Miller III, Decision problems for groups-survey and reflections. Algorithms and classification in combinatorial group theory (Berkeley, CA, 1989), Math. Sci. Res. Inst. Publ.,
23, Springer, New York, 1–59 (1992).
[17] P. S. Novikov, On the algorithmic unsolvability of the word problem in group theory, Trudy
Mat. Inst. Steklov 44, 1–143 (1955).
[18] M. O. Rabin, Recursive unsolvability of group theoretic problems, Annals of Math. 67,
172–194 (1958).
[19] H. Rogers Jr, Theory of recursive functions and effective computability, MIT Press (1987).
[20] J. Rotman, An introduction to the theory of groups, Springer-Verlag, New York (1995).
Dipartimento di Matematica ‘Federigo Enriques’
Università degli Studi di Milano
Via Cesare Saldini 50, Milano, 20133, ITALIA
[email protected]
| 4math.GR
|
On Improving the Capacity of Solving
Large-scale Wireless Network Design Problems
by Genetic Algorithms⋆
arXiv:1704.05367v1 [math.OC] 15 Apr 2017
Fabio D’Andreagiovanni
Konrad-Zuse-Zentrum für Informationstechnik Berlin (ZIB)
Takustrasse 7, 14195 Berlin, Germany
[email protected]
Abstract. Over the last decade, wireless networks have experienced an
impressive growth and now play a main role in many telecommunications systems. As a consequence, scarce radio resources, such as frequencies, became congested and the need for effective and efficient assignment methods arose. In this work, we present a Genetic Algorithm for
solving large instances of the Power, Frequency and Modulation Assignment Problem, arising in the design of wireless networks. To our best
knowledge, this is the first Genetic Algorithm that is proposed for such
problem. Compared to previous works, our approach allows a wider exploration of the set of power solutions, while eliminating sources of numerical problems. The performance of the algorithm is assessed by tests
over a set of large realistic instances of a Fixed WiMAX Network.
Keywords: Wireless Network Design, Large-scale Optimization, Genetic Algorithms.
1
Introduction
During the last years, wireless communications have experienced an explosive
growth thus rapidly leading to a dramatic congestion of radio resources. In such
complex scenario, the trial-and-error approach commonly adopted by practitioners to design networks has clearly shown its limitations. Telecommunications
companies and authorities are thus searching for more effective and efficient design approaches, also looking on Optimization (as shown by the recent call for
tenders for developing a Digital Video Broadcasting simulator by the Italian
Communications Regulatory Authority [2]). Many models and solution methods have been proposed for solving the problem of designing a wireless network.
⋆
This is the authors’ final version of the paper published in Di Chio C.
et al. (Eds): EvoApplications 2011, LNCS 6625, pp. 11-20, 2011. DOI:
10.1007/978-3-642-20520-0 2 . The final publication is available at Springer via
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20520-0 2 . This work was supported by the
German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), project ROBUKOM,
grant 03MS616E.
However, solving to optimality the overall problem is still a big challenge in the
case of large instances. In this paper we present a Genetic Algorithm for solving
the Power, Frequency and Modulation Assignment Problem, a relevant problem
that arises in the design of wireless networks and captures specific features of
Next Generation Networks.
2
The Wireless Network Design Problem
For modeling purposes, a wireless network can be described as a set of transmitters B that provide for a telecommunication service to a set of receivers T .
A receiver t ∈ T is said to be covered or served if it receives the service within
a minimum level of quality. Transmitters and receivers are characterized by a
location and a number of radio-electrical parameters (e.g., power emission and
frequency). The Wireless Network Design Problem (WND) consists in establishing the location and suitable values for the parameters of the transmitters with
the goal of maximizing the number of covered receivers or a revenue associated
with coverage.
In this work we consider a generalization of the so-called Power and Frequency Assignment Problem (PFAP), a version of the WND that is known to
be NP-hard [12]. In addition to power emission and frequency, we also consider
the transmission scheme (burst profile) as parameter to be established, modeling a feature of Next Generation Networks, such as WiMAX [3,6]. We indicate
this generalization of the PFAP by the name Power, Frequency and Modulation
Assignment Problem (PFMAP).
In the PFMAP two decisions must be taken: (1) establishing the power emission of each transmitter on each available frequency and (2) assigning served
receivers to activated transmitters specifying the frequency and the burst profile
used to transmit. To model these decisions, as first step we introduce the set F
of available frequencies and the set H of available burst profiles. Each frequency
f ∈ F has a constant bandwidth D and each burst profile h ∈ H is associated
with a spectral efficiency sh , which is the bandwidth required to satisfy one unit
of traffic demand generated by a receiver.
Then we can introduce two typologies of decision variables, namely:
– a continuous power variable pfb ∈ [0, Pmax ] ∀ b ∈ B, f ∈ F representing the
power emission of a transmitter b on frequency f ;
– a binary service assignment variable xftbh ∈ {0, 1} ∀ t ∈ T, b ∈ B, f ∈ F, h ∈
H defined in the following way:
1 if receiver t ∈ T is served by transmitter b ∈ B
on frequency f ∈ F through burst profile h ∈ H
xftbh =
0 otherwise
Given a frequency f ∈ F , every receiver t ∈ T picks out signals from every
transmitter b ∈ B and the power Pbf (t) that t receives from b on f is proportional
to the emitted power pfb by a factor atb ∈ [0, 1], i.e. Pbf (t) = atb · pfb . The factor
atb is called fading coefficient and summarizes the reduction in power that a
signal experiences while propagating from b to t [14].
Among the signals received from transmitters in B, a receiver t can select a
reference signal (or server), which is the one carrying the service. All the other
signals are interfering. We remark that, since each transmitter in B is associated
with a unique signal, in what follows we will also refer to B as the set of signals
received by t.
A receiver t is regarded as served by the network, specifically by server β ∈ B
on frequency f ∈ F through burst profile h ∈ H, if the ratio of the serving power
to the sum of the interfering powers (signal-to-interference ratio or SIR) is above
a threshold δh (SIR threshold ) whose value depends on the used burst profile h
[14]:
atβ · pfβ
≥ δh .
(1)
P
N + b∈B\{β} atb · pfb
Note that in the denominator we highlight the presence of the system noise
N > 0. By simple algebra operations, inequality (1) can be transformed into the
following linear inequality, commonly called SIR inequality:
X
atb · pfb ≥ δh · N .
(2)
atβ · pfβ − δh
b∈B\{β}
As we do not know a priori which transmitter b ∈ B will be the server of a
receiver t ∈ T and which frequency f ∈ F and burst profile h ∈ H will be used,
given a receiver t ∈ T we have one SIR inequality (2) for each potential server
β ∈ B and potentially usable frequency f and burst profile h. To ensure that t
is covered, at least one of such inequalities must be satisfied. This requirement
can be equivalently expressed through the following disjunctive constraint:
_
X
atβ · pf − δh
atb · pfb ≥ δh · N .
(3)
β
∀(β,f,h):β∈B,f ∈F,h∈H
b∈B\{β}
Adopting a standard approach used in Mixed-Integer Programming (see [13]),
the above disjunction can be represented by a family of linear constraints in
the p variables by introducing a large positive constant M , the so-called big-M
coefficient. Specifically, given a receiver t ∈ T we use the assignment variable
xftβh to introduce the following constraint for each potential 3-ple (β, f, h):
X
atb · pfb + M · (1 − xftβh ) ≥ δh · N .
(4)
atβ · pfβ − δh
b∈B(t)\{β}
It is easy to check that if xftβh = 1 then (4) reduces to the simple SIR constraint (2). If instead xftβh = 0 and M is sufficiently large1 , then (4) is satisfied
by any feasible power vector p and becomes redundant.
1
For example, we can set M = δh · N + δh
P
b∈B\{β}
atb · Pmax
By using constraints (4) and by introducing a parameter rt to denote revenue
associated with receiver t ∈ T (e.g., population, number of customers) , we can
define the following natural formulation (BM-PFMAP) for the PFMAP [6,7]:
XX X X
max
rt · xftbh
(BM − P F M AP )
t∈T b∈B f ∈F h∈H
s.t.
X
atβ · pfβ − δh
atb · pfb + M · (1 − xftβh ) ≥ δh · N
b∈B\{β}
XXX
xftbh
≤1
t ∈ T, b ∈ B, f ∈ F, h ∈ H
(5)
t∈T
(6)
b ∈ B, f ∈ F
(7)
b ∈ B, f ∈ F
(8)
t ∈ T, b ∈ B, f ∈ F, h ∈ H
(9)
b∈B f ∈F h∈H
XX
dt ·
1
· xf h ≤ D
sh tβ
t∈T h∈H
pfb ∈ [0, Pmax ]
xftbh ∈ {0, 1}
The objective function is to maximize the total revenue obtained by serving
receivers and constraint (6) ensures that each receiver is served at most once.
Each receiver generates a traffic demand dt and each frequency has a bandwidth
equal to D. Constraint (7) ensures that the sum of traffic demands (re-sized by
the spectral efficiency sh of the used burst profile) generated by the receivers
served by a transmitter does not exceed the bandwidth of the frequency. Finally,
(8) and (9) define the decision variables of the problem.
Drawbacks of the natural formulation. The natural formulation (BMPFMAP) expands a basic model that is widely used for the WND in different
application contexts, such as DVB, (e.g., [12]), UMTS (e.g., [1,11]) and WiMAX
([6,7]). In principle, such basic model and (BM-PFMAP) can be solved by commercial solvers such as IBM ILOG CPLEX [10]. However, it is well-known (see
[7]) that: (i) the fading coefficients may vary in a wide range leading to (very)
ill-conditioned coefficient matrices that make the solution process numerically
unstable; (ii) the big-M coefficients generate poor quality bounds that dramatically reduce the effectiveness of standard solution approach [13]; (iii) the resulting coverage plans are often unreliable and may contain errors (e.g., [7,11]). In
practice, the basic model and (BM-PFMAP) can be solved to optimality only
when used for small-sized instances. In the case of large real-life instances, even
finding feasible solutions can represent a difficult task, also for state-of-the-art
commercial solvers like CPLEX. Though these drawbacks are well-known, it is
interesting to note that just a relatively small part of the wide literature devoted
to WND has tried to overcome them. We refer the reader to [6] for a review of
works that have tried to tackle these drawbacks.
2.1
Contribution of this work and review of related literature
In this paper, we develop our original contribution by starting from a recent
work, [7], that proposes a family of strong valid inequalities for tackling the
drawbacks of (BM-PFMAP) that we have pointed out. The idea at the basis of
[7] is to quit modeling emission power as a continuous variable pb and to use
instead a set of discrete power levels P = {P1 , . . . , P|P| }, with P1 = 0 (switchedoff value), P|P| = Pmax and Pi > Pi−1 , for i = 2, . . . , |P|. This basic operation
allows the authors to define a family of lifted GUB cover inequalities that are
used in a solution algorithm that drastically enhances the quality of solutions
found.
The solution algorithm proposed in [7] is motivated by a trade-off that arises
from discretization: larger sets of discrete levels lead in principle to better solutions, but on the other hand the corresponding 0-1 Linear Program gets larger
and harder to solve. The computational experience shows that very good solutions can be found by considering small sets with well-spaced power values, but
that no improvement is obtained within the time limit when a number of levels
higher than six is considered.
In the present work, we investigate the possibility of using a Genetic Algorithm (GA) [8] as a fast heuristic to widen the exploration of the discrete
power solution space: the aim is to exploit the entire set of discrete power levels
and thus to evaluate power configurations with levels not included in the best
solutions found in [7]. In particular, our aim is to improve the capacity of solving large realistic instances by finding higher value solutions. We thus design a
GA that takes into account the specific features of the PFMAP and we test its
performance on the same set of realistic WiMAX instances used in [7].
Heuristics have been extensively used to tackle large instances of different
versions of the WND problem. Two relevant cases are provided by [1], where a
two-stage Tabu Search algorithm is proposed to solve the base station location
and power assignment problem in UMTS networks, and by [12], where a GRASP
algorithm is proposed to solve the PFAP arising in the planning of the Italian
National DVB network. The use of GA to solve versions of the WND is not
a novelty as well and many works can be found in literature. However, to our
best knowledge, no GA has been yet developed to solve the PFMAP and the
algorithm that we propose is the first for solving this level of generalization of
the WND. Until now, GAs were indeed developed to solve just single aspects
of the PFMAP: (i) the transmitter location problem (e.g., [4]); (ii) the service
assigment problem (e.g., [9]); (iii) the frequency assignment problem (e.g., [5]);
(iv) the power assignment problem (e.g., [15]). Moreover, we remark that our
algorithm is the first to be designed with the specific aim of improving the
capacity of solving instances, while tackling the numerical problems pointed out
in Section 2. We now proceed to present our original contributions for the WND.
3
A Genetic Algorithm for the PFMAP
A Genetic Algorithm (GA) is a heuristic method for solving optimization problems that resembles the evolution process of a population of individuals (for a
comprehensive introduction to the topic we refer the reader to [8]). At any iteration, a GA maintains a population whose individuals represent feasible solutions
to the problem. The solution is encoded in a chromosome associated with each
individual. The genetic strength of an individual is evaluated by a fitness function that establishes the quality of the corresponding solution to the problem. A
GA starts by defining an initial population, that iteration after iteration changes
by crossover, mutation and death of individuals, according to a natural selection
Darwinistic mechanism.
We develop a GA for the PFMAP that presents the following general structure:
1. Creation of the initial population
2. UNTIL the arrest condition is not satisfied DO
(a) Selection of individuals who generate the offspring
(b) Generation of the offspring by crossover
(c) Mutation of part of the population
(d) Death of part of the population
We now characterize the elements and the phases presented above for the
algorithm (GA-PFMAP) that we propose to solve the PFMAP.
3.1
Characterization of the population
Individual representation. As we have explained in Section 2.1, our aim
is to conduct a wider exploration of the power solution space, trying to obtain solutions with higher value. To this end, we establish that the chromosome of an individual corresponds to a power vector p of size |B| · |F |. Specifically, the chromosome presents one locus for each transmitter b ∈ B and frequency f ∈ F and each locus stores the power pfb emitted by b on f , namely
|F |
|F |
|F |
p = (p11 , . . . , p1 , p12 , . . . , p2 , . . . , p|B| ). Such power belongs to the set of discrete
power levels P, i.e. pfb ∈ P = {P1 , . . . , P|P| }.
We remark that establishing the power emission pfb ∀ b ∈ B, f ∈ F does not
completely characterize a solution of the PFMAP. We indeed have to fix the value
of the assignment variables xftbh and thus we need to set some assignment rule.
|F |
First, note that given a power vector p = (p11 , p21 , . . . , p|B| ) and a receiver t ∈ T
we can compute the power Pbf (t) that t receives from b on f , ∀b ∈ B, f ∈ F .
Through Pbf (t), if we fix the server β ∈ B of t, we can check if there exists a
SIR inequality (2) that is satisfied for some frequency f ∈ F and burst profile
h ∈ H. We establish the following assignment rule: as server of t we choose the
transmitter b that ensures the highest received power Pbf (t) on some f . This in
fact ensures the highest serving power. Once that the server β is chosen, we can
identify the SIR inequalities (2) that are satisfied by p when t is served by β for
some f ∈ F and h ∈ H. If the SIR inequality is satisfied for a multiplicity of
frequencies and/or burst profiles, we first choose as serving frequency fˆ the one
that ensures the highest value for the left-hand-side of (2) and then we choose as
burst profile ĥ the one that ensures the highest spectral efficiency (see Section 2).
ˆ
Thus for t served by β we have xf ĥ = 1 and xf h = 0 ∀f ∈ F \ {fˆ}, h ∈ H \ {ĥ}.
tβ
tβ
Note that this last rule may assign a receiver t to a transmitter β that violates the capacity constraint (7) of β on the chosen frequency fˆ. If this is the
case, we choose the second best couple of frequency and burst profile according
to the rule. If this not possible, the third best and so on. In the end, if there is
no capacity left for any valid couple (f, h), t is not considered covered by β.
Fitness function. As the aim of the WND is to maximize coverage, we adopt
a fitness function that evaluates the coverage ensured by an individual. Specifically, the fitness COV (p) of an individual is equal to the number of receivers that
are covered when the power vector is p and service assignment is done according
to the previously introduced rules.
Initial population. Our aim is to consider all the feasible discrete power levels from the beginning. Therefore, the initial population is represented by the
power vectors that are obtained by activating a single transmitter b ∈ B on a
single frequency f ∈ F at each of the discrete power levels Pl ∈ P. For every
b ∈ B, f ∈ F , the corresponding individuals included in the initial population
are thus: (0, 0, . . . , pfb = P2 , . . . , 0, 0) · · · (0, 0, . . . , pfb = P|P| , . . . , 0, 0) . Note
that we exclude the individual corresponding to all transmitters turned off, i.e.
pfb = P1 = 0 ∀b ∈ B, f ∈ F . We thus have |B| · |F | · |L − 1| initial individuals. We
denote the set of individuals representing the population at a generic iteration
of the algorithm by P .
3.2
Evolution of the population
Selection. In order to select the individuals who give birth to the new generation, we adopt a tournament selection approach: given the set P of individuals
constituting the current population and a value 0 < α < 1, we first define a
number k ∈ Z+ of groups including ⌊α · |P |⌋ individuals who are randomly extracted from P . Then we extract m < ⌊α · |P |⌋ individuals with the best fitness
from every group. These are the individuals who generate offspring by crossover.
Crossover, mutation and death. The individuals selected for crossover are
randomly paired up to constitute ⌊k · m/2⌋ couples. Each couple generates two
offspring by mixing its chromosome. Given a couple of parents with power vectors p1, p2, the crossover operation consists in mixing power levels that are in
the same position of p1 and p2 to generate two offspring with (possibly) higher
fitness power vectors p3, p4.
Before presenting the crossover procedure, we need to define a measure that
evaluates the impact of crossover on coverage. To this end, let ∆COV(p, pfb =
Pl ) ∈ Z denote the variation in the number of covered receivers caused by changing the power value pfb in position (b, f ) of vector p to the value Pl , while
maintaining all the other power values unchanged. We can then propose the
following crossover procedure, that concentrates the effort of creating a higher
fitness individual on p3. At the beginning of the crossover, p3 and p4 have all
elements equal to 0. Then, by following this ordering of indices (b, f ) : b ∈, f ∈
F : (1, 1) (1, 2) . . . (1, |F |) (2, 1) . . . (2, |F |) . . . (|B|, 1) . . . (|B|, |F |), each null
value inherits the power value in the same position of one of the two parents.
We now present the crossover rule for a generic position (β, φ). For indices
(b, f ) : b < β, f < φ, the crossover was already executed and thus the offspring
vectors p3, p4 present power levels inherited by the parents p1, p2. Power levels
of p3, p4 in positions (b, f ) : b ≥ β, f ≥ φ are instead still equal to zero. The rule
to establish the power value inherited by p3, p4 in (β, φ) is the following:
(
p1φβ if ∆COV(p3, p3φβ = p1φβ ) ≥ ∆COV(p3, p3φβ = p2φβ )
φ
p3β =
p2φβ otherwise
(
p1φβ if ∆COV(p3, p3φβ = p1φβ ) < ∆COV(p3, p3φβ = p2φβ )
φ
p4β =
p2φβ otherwise
This ensures that, at any step of the crossover procedure, offspring p3 inherits
the power level of the parent that allows the most favourable variation ∆COV
in coverage.
In addition to crossover, we also allow to alter the power vector of single individuals by mutation. This introduces new genetic information in the population
and helps to widen the solution space exploration and to avoid entrapment in
local optima. At any iteration, a number of individuals ⌊γ ·|P |⌋ with 0 < γ < 1 is
randomly chosen. Then, still by random selection, |F | power levels corresponding
with different frequencies are reduced to the immediately lower power level allowed in P. This mutation rule is set with the aim of defining new power vectors
that have lower powers but ensure the same coverage. The reduction in power
is generally desirable as a signal that is useful for a receiver may be interfering
for a different receiver.
Finally, after crossover and mutation, the weakest individuals die and are
removed from P . Specifically, we choose to select and remove the 2 · ⌊k · m/2⌋
individuals with the worst fitness function. The size of P is thus maintained
constant over all the iterations.
4
Computational experience
We test the performance of our GA on a set of 15 realistic instances, developed
with the Technical Strategy & Innovations Unit of British Telecom Italia (BT
Italia SpA). All the instances refers to a Fixed WiMAX Network [3], deployable
in an urban area corresponding to a residential neighborhood of Rome (Italy).
The instances consider various scenarios with up to |T | = 529 receivers, |B| = 36
transmitters, |F | = 3 frequencies, |H| = 4 burst profiles (see Table 1). This leads
to large formulations (BM-PFMAP) that are very hard to solve. For a detailed
description of the instances, we refer the reader to [7].
For each instance, we run the proposed algorithm (GA-PFMAP) 50 times
with a time limit of 1 hour by using a machine with a 1.80 GHz Intel Core 2
Duo processor and 2 GB of RAM. Each tournament selection involves k = 20
Table 1. Comparisons between (BM) and WPLAN formulations
|T*|
ID |T|
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
R1
R2
R3
R4
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
100
169
196
225
289
361
400
400
441
484
529
400
441
484
529
|B|
|F|
|H|
12
12
12
12
12
12
18
18
18
27
27
36
36
36
36
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
(BM-PFMAP)
63 (78)
99 (100)
108
93
77
154
259 (266)
370
302 (303)
99 (99)
283 (286)
0
191
226
145 (147)
WPLAN [7] (GA-PFMAP)
74
70
107
103
113
113
111
115
86
88
170
175
341
319
400
400
441
441
427
434
529
462
67
72
211
222
463
466
491
491
groups that include a fraction α = 0.05 of the population P . The best m = 8
individuals of each group are selected for crossover and, after the generation of
the new individuals, mutation affects a fraction γ = 0.1 of the population.
In Table 1, we compare the value of the best solution obtained through the
three approaches that we consider, namely the direct solution of (BM-PFMAP)
by ILOG Cplex 10.1, the solution of the Power-Indexed formulation by the algorithm WPLAN [7] and the solution of (BM-PFMAP) by the proposed algorithm
(GA-PFMAP). Results for (BM-PFMAP) and WPLAN are derived from [7].
The presence of two values in some lines of the column of (BM-PFMAP) indicates that the coverage plans returned by Cplex contain errors and some receivers
are actually not covered. We remark that (GA-PFMAP) provides solutions that
always ensure a higher coverage than (BM-PFMAP) and without coverage errors. Making a comparison with WPLAN, we instead note that (GA-PFMAP),
though in some cases finds solutions with lower coverage, for most of the cases
is able to find solutions that ensure an equal or higher number of covered receivers than WPLAN. This is particularly evident for instances that seems to be
very hard to solve through (BM-PFMAP). The algorithm is thus effective and
is worth of further investigations.
5
Conclusion and future work
We presented a Genetic Algorithm (GA) to tackle large realistic instances of
a relevant problem arising in wireless network design. We showed that a GA
helps to improve the value of solutions found through a wider exploration of the
power space. A future research path could be represented by the integration of
a refined GA into an exact solution method. It is indeed common experience
that the combination of fast heuristics with Mixed-Integer Linear Programming
leads to a great reduction in the running times w.r.t pure exact optimization
methods. A sensitivity analysis of the GA parameters and a study on the impact
of different starting conditions and selection strategies would also constitute
important subjects of investigations.
Acknowledgments. The author thanks Carlo Mannino and Antonella Nardin
for fruitful discussions. Thanks go also to the three anonymous referees who
provided valuable comments.
References
1. Amaldi, E., Belotti, P., Capone, A., Malucelli, F.: Optimizing base station location
and configuration in UMTS networks. Ann. Oper. Res. 146 (1), 135–152 (2006)
2. Autoritá per la Garanzia nelle Comunicazioni, Delibera N.269/09/CONS,
http://www.agcom.it/default.aspx?DocID=3359
3. Andrews, J.G., Ghosh, A., Muhamed, R.: Fundamentals of WiMAX. Prentice Hall,
Upper Saddle River, USA (2007)
4. Choi, Y.S., Kim, K.S., Kim, N.: The Displacement of Base Station in Mobile Communication with Genetic Approach. EURASIP J. Wireless Comm. and Net. Vol.
2008 (2008)
5. Colombo, G.: A Genetic Algorithm for Frequency Assigment with Problem Decomposition. Int. J. Mob. Net. Des. and Innov. 1 (2), 102–112 (2006)
6. D’Andreagiovanni, F.: Pure 0-1 Programming Approaches to Wireless Network Design. Ph.D. Thesis, Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome, Italy, Winner of the 2010
INFORMS Doctoral Dissertation Award for Operations Research in Telecommunications, (2010)
7. D’Andreagiovanni, F., Mannino, C., Sassano, A.: GUB Covers and Power-Indexed
Formulations for Wireless Network Design. Technical Report vol. 2 n. 14, Department of Computer and System Sciences, Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome, Italy
(2010)
8. Goldberg, D.E.: Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization & Machine Learning.
Addison-Wesley, Reading, USA (1988)
9. Hu, T., Chen, Y.P., Banzhaf, W.: WiMAX Network Planning Using AdaptivePopulation-Size Genetic Algorithm. In: Di Chio, C., et al. (eds.) EvoApplications
2010. LNCS, vol. 6025, 31–40. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
10. IBM ILOG CPLEX, http://www-01.ibm.com/software/integration/optimization/cplex-optimizer
11. Kalvenes, J., Kennington, J., Olinick, E.: Base Station Location and Service Assignments in W-CDMA Networks. INFORMS J. Comp. 18 (3), 366–376 (2006).
12. Mannino, C., Rossi, F., Smriglio, S.: The Network Packing Problem in Terrestrial
Broadcasting. Oper. Res. 54 (6), 611–626 (2006)
13. Nehmauser, G., Wolsey, L.: Integer and Combinatorial Optimization. John Wiley
& Sons, Hoboken, USA (1988)
14. Rappaport, T.S.: Wireless Communications: Principles and Practice, 2nd Edition.
Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, USA (2001)
15. Song, W.J., et al.: Evolutionary Computation and Power Control for Radio Resource Management in CDMA Cellular Radio Networks. PIMRC 2002, vol. 3, 1417–
1421 (2002)
| 9cs.NE
|
arXiv:1801.03996v1 [quant-ph] 11 Jan 2018
Noisy Feedback and Loss Unlimited
Private Communication
Dawei Ding
Saikat Guha
Stanford Institute for Theoretical Physics
Stanford University
Stanford, CA 94305, USA
Email: [email protected]
College of Optical Sciences
University of Arizona
Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
Email: [email protected]
Abstract—Alice is transmitting a private message to Bob
across a bosonic wiretap channel with the help of a public
feedback channel to which all parties, including the fullyquantum equipped Eve, have completely noiseless access. We
find that by altering the model such that Eve’s copy of the
initial round of feedback is corrupted by an iota of noise, one
step towards physical relevance, the capacity can be increased
dramatically. It is known that the private capacity with respect
to the original model for a pure-loss bosonic channel is at most
− log(1 − η) bits per mode, where η is the transmissivity, in the
limit of infinite input photon number. This is a very pessimistic
result as there is a finite rate limit even with an arbitrarily large
number of input photons. We refer to this as a loss limited rate.
However, in our altered model we find that we can achieve a rate
of (1/2) log(1 + 4ηNS ) bits per mode, where NS is the input
photon number. This rate diverges with NS , in sharp contrast
to the result for the original model. This suggests that physical
considerations behind the eavesdropping model should be taken
more seriously, as they can create strong dependencies of the
achievable rates on the model. For by a seemingly inconsequential
weakening of Eve, we obtain a loss-unlimited rate. Our protocol
also works verbatim for arbitrary i.i.d. noise (not even necessarily
Gaussian) injected by Eve in every round, and even if Eve is given
access to copies of the initial transmission and noise. The error
probability of the protocol decays super-exponentially with the
blocklength.
I. I NTRODUCTION
We consider the task of continuous variable (CV) private
communication over a lossy bosonic channel with additive
noise, with a quantum-limited adversary. We consider a forward wiretap channel from Alice to Bob with an eavesdropper
Eve. There is also a backward public side channel from Bob to
Alice. All parties, including Eve, have perfectly noiseless access to communication on this side channel. This immediately
presents a problem. All communication channels in reality
have a non-zero level of noise. With error-correction the noise
can be reduced, but never completely removed. Therefore this
model is clearly unphysical. Indeed, most of the information
theoretic capacity analyses of private communication and
secret-key generation have traditionally assumed such a zeroerror feedback. Admittedly, the process of abstraction that
allows a problem to be mathematically analyzed inevitably
causes such unphysical features to emerge. However, we will
find in this paper that this particular feature can be problematic
in that ameliorating it can create a significant difference in
achievable rates.
More explicitly, we propose a protocol over a lossy bosonic
channel and consider an alteration of the feedback-assisted private communication model in which Eve’s copy of the public
communication sent by Bob to Alice on just the initial round of
the protocol is corrupted by a small amount of noise, a small
step towards physical relevance. Eve obtains the remainder
of the public communication noiselessly, and is otherwise
quantum equipped, i.e., has perfect quantum memories and the
ability to make arbitrary collective quantum measurements. We
show that with such a seemingly inconsequential weakening
of the eavesdropper, Alice and Bob can achieve a rate of
1
1
2 log(1 + 4ηNS ) secure bits per mode using a simple laserlight modulation and homodyne detection, NS being the mean
input photon number per mode. This is a loss unlimited rate,
in sharp contrast to the loss limited upper bound known for the
original model: − log(1 − η) [1], [2]. The exact same protocol
also works if the channel has noise in addition to loss. We
will argue that the noise can even be non-Gaussian.
A closely related classical result 2 was proven in [4].
However, their altered communication model assumes Eve’s
copy of the feedback is corrupted by Gaussian additive noise
and on every round. Thus this is a more specialized and
significant departure from the usual model. They do consider
more general correlated noise between the different channels
involved, but this can be integrated into our model as well. In
addition to the difference in model alteration, in the discussion
section we will see that we can slightly strengthen Eve from
what is discussed above, by giving her copies of the initial
transmission and noise, and still obtain our main result with
the same protocol. Note that our results trivially apply to a
classical additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channel and
since adding more noise to Eve’s feedback can only increase
the achievable rate, implies the result in [4].
1 Throughout
this paper, logarithms are base 2.
that in the classical case the feedback-assisted private capacity of
the Gaussian wiretap channel also has a loss limited capacity. This can be
seen for instance by upper bounding it by the secret key capacity and upper
bounding that via Theorem 4 of [3].
2 Note
II. M AIN R ESULT
Alice is to send a message to Bob over a bosonic (quantum)
wiretap channel N , which is to be kept private from Eve,
by transmitting bosonic states on the forward channel N and
using a backward noiseless classical feedback channel. Eve
obtains the quantum output of the complement of the isometric
extension of N , and can eavesdrop on the feedback channel,
but she obtains a noisy version of the classical feedback for
the initial round. Denoting the classical feedback system as
Y , for this round Eve obtains the output of a classical noisy
channel W (Y ). Furthermore, we assume that the capacity of
the noisy channel W (Y ) from Bob to Eve, is finite for a finite
input power, that is,
C(W, P ) ≡
max
Y :E[Y 2 ]≤P
I(Y ; W )
is finite for finite 3 P . Note that this condition is very mild.
For instance, if W (Y ) = Y + S, with S ∼ Gaussian(0, N0 ),
is AWGN, N0 can be arbitrarily small as long as it is
nonzero. Hence, we only need an iota of noise. We shall
refer to this setting as asymmetric feedback-assisted private
communication. We say asymmetric because the feedback is
noiseless to Alice but noisy to Eve on the initial round. A
diagram of the communication model for the initial round is
shown in fig. 1. B 0 is some leftover system that Bob keeps.
For subsequent rounds no noise is applied to Eve’s copy of
Y.
E
W
A
B
Y
B0
Y
Y
of the message to vanish. We leave open whether we can obtain
our result with this stronger privacy criterion.
We will consider the case where the forward channel is
a single mode thermal bosonic wiretap channel: denoting
Alice’s, Bob’s and Eve’s optical modes as â, b̂, and ê, respectively, the channel is described by the Heisenberg evolutions:
b̂ =
√
ηâ +
p
1 − η fˆ;
ê =
p
1 − ηâ −
√ ˆ
η f,
(1)
where fˆ is the optical mode of the environment, which is in
a thermal state ρth (0, nth ) with thermal number nth , and η
is the transmissivity. A thermal state is given by ρth (α, n̄) ≡
´ d2 β −|β|2 /n̄
e
|α + βi hα + β|. We enforce an average photon
C π n̄
number
constraint
on Alice’s input over the i ∈ [0 : n] rounds:
Pn
1
†
tr[â
âρ
A
i ] ≤ NS . We now state our main theorem.
i=0
n+1
Theorem 1. The rate
PH =
1
NS
log 1 + 2 ,
2
σ
(2)
1
+ 1−η
where σ 2 ≡ 4η
2η nth , is achievable with mean photon
per mode NS for asymmetric feedback-assisted private communication over the thermal bosonic wiretap channel, under
the aforesaid model.
Proof. The rate is achieved by generalizing the SchalkwijkKailath protocol [8] to the quantum setting.
√
√
Codebook: Divide the interval [− NS , NS ] into 2nR
equal length intervals for some R ∈ R+ . Given a message
m ∈ [2nR ], let θ(m) be the midpoint of the m-th interval.
The codebook is then given by the coherent states |θ(m)i.
Encoding and Decoding: When we say Alice transmits a
random variable X on R, we mean she sends the mixed state
ˆ
ρX ≡
dxpX (x)|xi hx|,
R
Fig. 1: A diagram of the asymmetric feedback-assisted private
communication model for the initial round of communication.
The privacy criterion we use is the same as the one used
in definitions of private communication in various classic
papers [5], [6], [3] and in the classical result [4]; i.e., we
assume the message M is uniformly distributed and require:
lim
k→∞
1
I(M ; E) = 0,
k
where k is the number of rounds and E is the aggregation of
Eve’s systems after all k rounds. Note that this is in general
weaker than the privacy criterion used in quantum Shannon
theory analyses, for instance [7], which requires the trace
distance between Eve’s states and a constant state independent
3 Note that the capacity is finite at all finite cost constraints iff it is finite
at some finite cost constraint. The forward direction is trivial. For the reverse
direction, assume for contradiction that there is some finite cost constraint at
which the capacity is infinite. Then, by time-sharing we can conclude that is
infinite at all finite cost constraints, a contradiction.
where |xi is a coherent state. Note that E[X 2 ] = tr[↠âρX ].
Given message m, on round i = 0, Alice sends the
constant random variable X0 which takes the value θ(m).
√
Bob√receives ρth ( η θ(m), (1 − η)nth )B0 , and Eve receives
ρth ( 1 − η θ(m), ηnth )E0 . Bob then performs an x homodyne
measurement on his output, to obtain, with appropriate scaling, the output of an induced additive white Gaussian noise
(AWGN) channel with input X0 : Y0 ∼ N (θ(m), σ 2 ). Now, on
every round, Bob will simply send a copy of his measurement
result through the feedback channel. Via the feedback channel
Alice receives Y0 , while Eve receives W0 (Y0 ).
Denote the random noise that is added in the i-th induced
AWGN channel from Alice to Bob by Ni ≡ Yi −Xi . Note that
since Alice has access to both Yi and Xi , she can always explicitly compute Ni . For round i ≥ 1, Alice computes the conditional expectation E[N0 |Y i−1 ], where Y i−1 ≡ Y1 . . . Yi−1 ,
that is, Y0 is not included, and E[N0 |Y 0 ] ≡ E[N0 ] = 0. She
then transmits
Xi = γi (N0 − E[N0 |Y i−1 ]),
where γi are chosen such that E[Xi2 ] = NS . Note that this
guarantees that the photon number constraint is satisfied and
with equality. Bob receives the state
ˆ
√
dxpXi (x)ρth ( ηx, (1 − η)nth )Bi ,
R
on which he will do a homodyne x measurement to obtain Yi ,
while Eve receives
ˆ
p
dxpXi (x)ρth ( 1 − ηx, ηnth )Ei .
R
At the end of the protocol (i = n), Bob computes
Θn ≡ Y0 − E[N0 |Y n ] = θ(m) + (N0 − E[N0 |Y n ]).
His guess of the message will then be m̂, where θ(m̂) is
closest to Θn .
Error Analysis: Note that this protocol is simply the
Schalkwijk-Kailath protocol over an induced classical AWGN
channel with noise σ 2 . Therefore, by the analysis in [8], [9],
the probability of error of this protocol is upper bounded by
r
2
pe ≤
exp −22n(PH −R)−1 NS /σ 2 .
π
Hence, pe −−−−→ 0 if R < PH . For completeness, we
n→∞
reproduce this argument in Section A.
Privacy Analysis: For round i ≥ 1, the message is no
longer involved in the protocol as Alice is simply trying to
transmit the noise N0 , which is independent of the message
M , to Bob. Hence we can upper bound the mutual information
between the message and Eve’s systems as follows:
Bob then does a homodyne x measurement, which produces
the system Y0 , N0 (None of the parties have posession of N0 .):
r
ˆ
ˆ
2nR
1 X
d2 α −|α|2 /nth
2η
|mi hm|M ⊗
e
dy0
2nR m=1
πn
π
th
C
R
e
−2η(y0 −θ(m)−
= I(M ; E0 W0 N0 ) + I(M ; E W |E0 W0 N0 )
= I(M ; E0 W0 N0 ).
(3)
The inequality follows from monotonicity of mutual information. The last equality follows from our observation that the
subsequent transmissions are only about N0 and independent
of the message. We explicitly compute the state at the end of
round i = 0. We start with a uniformly distributed message:
nR
1
2nR
2
X
e
−2η(n0 −
ˆ
⊗
⊗|
R
p
Alice encodes the message into a coherent state:
q
1−η
2
η Re(α))
2nR
2
X
|mi hm|M ⊗ |θ(m)i hθ(m)|A0 .
m=1
A0 is then sent into the thermal bosonic wiretap channel:
ˆ
2nR
1 X
d2 α −|α|2 /nth
e
|mi
hm|
⊗
M
2nR m=1
C πnth
p
p
√
√
| ηθ(m) + 1 − ηαi h ηθ(m) + 1 − ηα|B0
p
p
√
√
⊗ | 1 − ηθ(m) − ηαi h 1 − ηθ(m) − ηα|E0 .
(4)
where pW0 |Y0 is the probability distribution of the output of
the noisy feedback channel given input Y0 and we made the
substitution n0 ≡ y0 − θ(m).
Using (4), we can bound
I(M ; E0 W0 N0 )
=
I(M ; E0 W0 |N0 ) + I(M ; N0 )
≤
I(M Y0 ; E0 W0 )
≤
I(M ; W0 |Y0 ) + I(Y0 ; W0 ) + S(E0 |W0 )
≤
I(Y0 ; W0 ) + S(E0 ),
(5)
where we used the facts that M and N0 are independent,
N0 = Y0 − X0 , M → Y0 → W0 form a Markov chain, and
that S(E0 |M Y0 W0 ) ≥ 0 since the conditioned systems are
classical. Now, the first term is simply the mutual information
between the input and output of the noisy channel to Eve on
the initial round. Hence, it is upper bounded by the capacity
C(W, NS + σ 2 ) of feedback channel from Bob to Eve with
cost constraint NS + σ 2 = E[(Y0 )2 ]:
I(Y0 ; W0 ) ≤ C(W, NS + σ 2 ).
(6)
This capacity is finite by assumption. We can bound the second
term in (5) by observing
nR
1
|n0 i hn0 |N0
dw0 pW0 |Y0 (w0 |θ(m) + n0 )|w0 i hw0 |W0
p
√
√
1 − ηθ(m) − ηαi h 1 − ηθ(m) − ηα|E0 ,
|mi hm|M .
m=1
|y0 i hy0 |Y0
Note that |y0 i hy0 |, |y0 − θ(m)i hy0 − θ(m)| are classical
states and are not coherent states. Bob sends a noisy copy
to Eve to obtain the state:
r
ˆ
ˆ
2nR
2η
1 X
d2 α −|α|2 /nth
|mi hm|M ⊗
e
dn0
nR
2 m=1
π
R
C πnth
≤ I(M ; E0n W0n N0 )
n
1−η
2
η Re(α))
⊗ |y0 − θ(m)i hy0 − θ(m)|N0
p
p
√
√
⊗ | 1 − ηθ(m) − ηαi h 1 − ηθ(m) − ηα|E0 .
I(M ; E0n W0n )
n
q
2nR ˆ
X
d2 α −|α|2 /nth
e
πnth
m=1 C
2
p
√
2
1 − ηθ(m) − η Re(α) + ηIm(α)
†
tr[(ê ê)ρE0 ] =
≤
1
2nR
2nR ˆ
X
m=1
C
1
2nR
d2 α −|α|2 /nth
(1 − η)NS + η|α|2
e
πnth
= (1 − η)NS + ηnth ,
where in the inequality the term linear in Re(α) vanishes after
integrating over α. Hence, S(E0 ) ≤ g((1 − η)NS + ηnth )
where g(x) ≡ (x + 1) log(x + 1) − x log x [10], [11].
Since both terms of independent of n, we conclude
1
I(M ; E0n W0n )
n+1→∞ n + 1
1
≤ lim
I(M ; E0 W0 N0 )
n+1→∞ n + 1
1
≤ lim
(I(Y0 ; W0 ) + S(E0 ))
n+1→∞ n + 1
C(W, NS + σ 2 ) + g((1 − η)NS + ηnth )
≤ lim
n+1→∞
n+1
= 0,
lim
thereby establishing privacy.
III. D ISCUSSION
We have proven that with respect to the communication
model of asymmetric feedback where Eve obtains a slightly
noisy copy of the feedback on the initial round of the protocol, it is possible to achieve a much higher rate of private
communication over a lossy thermal-noise bosonic wiretap
channel, even one that is loss unlimited (2). It is worthwhile
to make some observations about this result, as well as discuss
its implications, limitations, and possible extensions.
A. Extensions
Eq. (2) is achievable with a probability of decoding error
that decays doubly exponentially with the number of channel
uses. That is, the rate is achievable with an infinite error
exponent. Indeed, this was the main thrust of the result in [8]
for the setting of feedback-assisted classical communication.
It was then extended by [12], where it was shown that
we can actually achieve a probability of error that goes as
an exponential tower with an order that increases linearly
with the blocklength. This was shown to be optimal by a
corresponding lower bound on the error probability. This lower
bound would also apply in our case since it only concerns the
part where Alice reliably sends a message to Bob. The only
essential difference between the protocol in [12] and that of
Schalkwijk and Kailath is that the former preserves the discrete
structure of the message. In particular, in both, only the initial
transmission contains information about the message. It is then
straightforward to make the same extension to our setting. That
is, we can achieve (2) with a block probability of error
pe ≤
1
f (n) e
for sufficiently large n, where n a denotes the tetration operation,
5(1 − ϕ−1 (R))
−1
f (n) ≡ n[1 − ϕ (R)] −
,
PH − R
and
ν
NS
ϕ(ν) ≡ log 1 + 2
.
2
σ ν
Note that this expression has minor differences compared to
the bound in [12] because we use bits instead of nats. Some
simplifications were also made for presentation.
Another possible extension follows from observing that the
achieved rate (2) is not optimal. This is because it is known
that squeezed state encoding can achieve higher rates over
the thermal noise lossy bosonic channel with a homodyne
receiver [13]. However, the induced classical channel with
squeezed states encoding is AWGN, so our argument trivially
applies to this case. With optimal squeezed-state encoding, we
can achieve a rate [13]:
4NS + 2 − f (η, NS ) + f (η, NS )−1
1
,
Psq = log 1 +
2
((1 − η)/η) + f (η, NS )−1
(7)
where
1/2
2(1−η) 1+η
η 1+ η
−1
2η + 2NS
f (η, NS ) ≡
.
1−η
When Bob uses a homodyne detection receiver, a squeezed
state encoding is conjectured to be the optimal encoding for
any Gaussian bosonic channel. If this conjecture is proven true,
Eq. (7) would be optimal for asymmetric feedback-assisted
private communication assuming that Bob makes a homodyne
detection since the private capacity is trivially upper bounded
by the classical capacity.
B. Non-Gaussian Channels
An apparent limitation of our result is that it strongly relies
on the induced classical channel from Alice to Bob being an
AWGN channel. This fact was heavily used in for instance the
error analysis of the Schalkwijk-Kailath protocol. However,
as noted in Remark 17.3 of [9], this exact protocol, that is,
the protocol with the conditional expectations E[N0 |Y i−1 ]
realized in the AWGN case, can be applied for channels with
non-Gaussian additive noise. In fact, it would work for any
affine channel whose output is given by
a(X + N ),
(8)
where X is the input, N is some general additive noise
independent of X, and a 6= 0 is some scaling. The error
analysis follows by observing that the estimate Θn is linear
in X0 , N0n as shown in [9]. Hence, in the affine channel
case the variance of Θn /a has the exact same expression in
terms of X0 , N0n as in the AWGN case, and so Var[Θn ] =
a2 Var[N ]2−2nC(Var[N ],NS ) , where
1
NS
C(Var[N ], NS ) ≡ log 1 +
(9)
2
Var[N ]
is the capacity of the AWGN channel with the corresponding
noise statistics. Then, by Chebyshev’s inequality,
n
o
p
pe ≤ Prob |Θn − θ(m)| > NS 2−nR
≤ a2 2−2n(C(Var[N ],NS )−R)
Var[N ]
.
NS
This works for general affine channels, albeit at the cost of
losing the doubly exponential decay. The privacy analysis
can also be generalized since the argument did not make
use of Gaussianity. Note that (9) is in general less than the
actual capacity of the channel, but it is still loss unlimited. In
particular, our result applies to a general lossy bosonic wiretap
channel where the additive noise (state of the fˆ mode) can be
any state, that is, it does not even need to be Gaussian. This
is shown in fig. 2. It is simple to see that the induced classical
𝜌%
𝜌"
𝜌#
𝜌$
Fig. 2: A non-Gaussian channel corresponding to a bosonic
wiretap channel where the additive noise ρN is not Gaussian.
channel in this case is an affine channel. This subsumes a large
class of physical optical channels.
However, it would be interesting to extend our result to
a general quantum wiretap channel. Unfortunately, there are
channels for which it is not possible to induce a classical
affine channel via a particular encoding and decoding. A
trivial example is the constant channel which outputs a state
regardless of the input. Admittedly, such a channel is useless
for communication, so it is not surprising that our protocol
fails there. For the specific case of coherent encoding and
homodyne detection, we can find explicit nontrivial channels
for which we do not induce an affine channel. For instance,
consider the channel, a unitary self-Kerr interaction, which
maps a coherent state to a cat state: |αi 7→ √12 (|αi + |−αi). It
is not difficult to see that a homodyne measurement of a cat
state will always have an expected value of zero. If the channel
is affine: X 7→ a(X + N ), then given E[a(X + N )] = 0,
either a = 0 or E[N ] = −E[X]. If a = 0, then the
measurement result is always zero, which is clearly wrong.
The latter possibility is also impossible since additive noise
must be independent of the message. The conclusion follows.
Thus, it is not clear whether our protocol can be extended to
general quantum channels.
C. Communication Model
We assumed that Eve can eavesdrop on both the (noisy,
quantum) forward and (classical) backward channels, but that
her copy of the initial round of classical feedback has some
noise. From a physical standpoint, this is a natural assumption
since there is always some noise in the physical layer. It might
appear unnatural that the feedback error happens on the initial
round, but this could be realized by Alice and Bob somehow
knowing the time window in which the feedback noise might
occur and starting the protocol during that window. Our
constraint on feedback noise is reasonable as well, that any
physical Eve-to-Bob channel should not have infinite capacity.
One might say that in order to make the model more
physically relevant, there should be noise in the feedback
channel to Alice as well. Indeed, it is this very noiselessness
that is key to the result that we obtain. The channel to Alice is a
noiseless CV classical channel, which has an infinite capacity,
while we constrained the channel to Eve to have finite capacity.
It is this infinite difference that allows us to get a loss unlimited
rate 4 . Hence, it is unlikely that we can achieve loss unlimited
rates if we allow noise in the channel to Alice as well. Indeed,
it is known that linear schemes such as Schalkwijk-Kailath
cannot achieve any positive rates in this regime [14]. However,
this does not undermine our thesis that (2) indicates issues
with the usual assumption of noiselessness of the public side
channel. The fact that a classical noiseless CV channel has
infinite capacity introduces significant unphysical features to
the model and makes achievable rates strongly dependent on
the model. For by just adding an infinitesimal amount of noise
to the eavesdropper’s copy of the initial round, one single step
towards physical relevance, we obtain a loss unlimited rate
instead of a loss limited one.
Now, it is somewhat queer that we can achieve a markedly
different rate even if we allow Eve to have noiseless access to
the feedback after the initial round. For an intuition for why
this works, we observe that the Schalkwijk-Kailath protocol
can be summarized as follows: Bob on the initial round
receives the message with additive noise N0 and subsequently
learns the value of N0 to exquisite precision. Since Eve has
additional noise to what Bob received on the initial round,
even if Eve can also learn N0 to exquisite precision, the
accuracy with which she can recover the message is still
limited by the additional noise. Indeed, we can even further
alter our communication model so as to give Eve N0 exactly
as done by (3), thereby allowing her to completely simulate
the protocol for rounds i > 0, and our result would still hold.
We can also give her a copy X00 of the quantum system 5 X0
that Alice sends on round i = 0. This would simply replace
E0 in the privacy analysis by X00 E0 , whose entropy we can
again bound via subadditivity and then by bounds on photon
number. Thus, we can alter our communication model so that
Eve is strengthened, and our result still holds. This reflects
again that our protocol essentially depends on that initial round
of feedback where there is an infinite difference in capacities.
At first glance the fact that we only need noise on the initial
round appears to have implausibly strong implications. One
might think our result holds in the usual feedback-assisted
private communication model but where Alice and Bob have
4 Note that this is an infinite difference in capacity between the channels
from Bob to Alice and Eve, and we are trying to achieve forward private
communication from Alice to Bob. Thus it is not clear a priori that this
should be possible.
5 Note that this is not the classical random variable that is encoded into the
quantum system, but the encoded quantum system itself.
a pre-shared secret key which they can use to simulate the
noise. For instance, by performing bitwise addition with the
pre-shared key, they can simulate an additive noise channel
with noise S0 on the initial round of feedback. However, since
any reasonable pre-shared key has finite Shannon entropy, S0
is discrete. Then, the capacity of the feedback channel would
be infinite, which precludes us from bounding the information
leaked to Eve. Hence it does not seem sufficient to have preshared secret key to obtain our result.
Lastly, it is worth looking at the closely related communication models of two way private communication, secret key
agreement, and quantum key distribution. If we make the same
alteration, that is, introduce noise in the classical feedback
in the initial round, Bob can simply send an arbitrarily long
locally generated random bit string to Alice during that round.
Alice will then receive this key noiselessly, while Eve will
only receive a noisy copy whose mutual information with
the key is finite since the capacity of the noisy feedback
channel is finite. Hence, in these models the infinite difference
in capacities trivially leads to an infinite rate. This again
shows the dependence of the rates to the model considered
and suggests that in general we should more seriously address
blatant unphysical features in the communication model.
Acknowledgements. DD is supported by the Stanford Graduate Fellowship and the National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate Fellowship. SG was supported by the Communications and Networking with Quantum OperationallySecure Technology for Maritime Deployment (CONQUEST)
program funded by the Office of Naval Research (ONR) under
a Raytheon BBN Technologies prime contract # N00014-16C-2069. We would like to thank Patrick Hayden and Tsachy
Weissman for valuable discussions and feedback. DD would
like to thank God for all of His provisions.
R EFERENCES
[1] M. Takeoka, S. Guha, and M. M. Wilde, “Fundamental rate-loss tradeoff
for optical quantum key distribution,” Nature communications, vol. 5, p.
5235, 2014.
[2] S. Pirandola, R. Laurenza, C. Ottaviani, and L. Banchi, “Fundamental
limits of repeaterless quantum communications,” Nature Communications, vol. 8, 2017.
[3] U. M. Maurer, “Secret key agreement by public discussion from common
information,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 39, no. 3,
pp. 733–742, 1993.
[4] D. Gunduz, D. R. Brown, and H. V. Poor, “Secret communication with
feedback,” in Information Theory and Its Applications, 2008. ISITA
2008. International Symposium on. IEEE, 2008, pp. 1–6.
[5] A. D. Wyner, “The wire-tap channel,” Bell Labs Technical Journal,
vol. 54, no. 8, pp. 1355–1387, 1975.
[6] I. Csiszár and J. Korner, “Broadcast channels with confidential messages,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 24, no. 3, pp.
339–348, 1978.
[7] M. M. Wilde, Quantum information theory. Cambridge University
Press, 2013.
[8] J. Schalkwijk and T. Kailath, “A coding scheme for additive noise
channels with feedback–i: No bandwidth constraint,” IEEE Transactions
on Information Theory, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 172–182, 1966.
[9] A. El Gamal and Y.-H. Kim, Network information theory. Cambridge
University Press, 2011.
[10] C. M. Caves and P. D. Drummond, “Quantum limits on bosonic
communication rates,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 66, no. 2, p.
481, 1994.
[11] J. D. Bekenstein, “Universal upper bound on the entropy-to-energy ratio
for bounded systems,” Physical Review D, vol. 23, no. 2, p. 287, 1981.
[12] R. G. Gallager and B. Nakiboglu, “Variations on a theme by schalkwijk
and kailath,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 56, no. 1,
pp. 6–17, 2010.
[13] S. Guha, “Classical capacity of the free-space quantum-optical channel,”
Master’s thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2004.
[14] Y.-H. Kim, A. Lapidoth, and T. Weissman, “The gaussian channel
with noisy feedback,” in Information Theory, 2007. ISIT 2007. IEEE
International Symposium on. IEEE, 2007, pp. 1416–1420.
[15] R. Durrett, Probability: theory and examples. Cambridge University
Press, 2010.
A PPENDIX
the capacity of the AWGN channel with power NS and noise
σ 2 given in (2). The second way to calculate this gives
We reproduce for completeness the explicit error analysis
of the Schalkwijk-Kailath protocol [8] as given in [9] but with
our notation. Consider the vector N ≡ (N0 , . . . , Nn ). This is
clearly jointly Gaussian since Ni are independent and Gaussian. We claim that (N0 , Y1 , . . . , Yn ) is also jointly Gaussian
where Y n are mutually independent and Yi ∼ N (0, NS +σ 2 ).
I(N0 ; Y n ) = h(N0 ) − h(N0 |Y n )
1
1
= log(2πe Var[N0 ]) − log(2πe Var[N0 |Y n ])
2
2
1
Var[N0 |Y n ]
,
= − log
2
σ2
where the second equality follows from the fact that N0 |Y n =
y n is Gaussian with variance independent of y n by the joint
Gaussianity of (N0 , Y1 , . . . , Y n ). Note that Var[N0 |Y n ] is a
random variable, but since it does not depend on y n , we can
identify it with the value it takes on almost surely.
We conclude from the two ways to write the mutual
information that Var[N0 |Y n ] = σ 2 2−2nPH . Now, Θn = Y0 −
E(N0 |Y n ) is Gaussian since it’s linear in Y0n . Furthermore,
Proof. We proceed by induction. For the base case, we first
note that Y1 = γ1 N0 + N1 , so we obtain (N0 , Y1 , N2 , . . . Nn )
by a linear transformation, so it’s jointly Gaussian with
E[Y1 ] = 0. Furthermore, E[Y12 ] = γ12 + σ 2 = NS + σ 2 since
N0 , N1 are independent.
Now we consider the inductive case. Assume
(N0 , Y1 , . . . , Yk , Nk+1 , . . . , Nn ) is jointly Gaussian and
Y k are mutually independent and Yi ∼ N (0, NS + σ 2 ). Then,
(N0 , Y1 , . . . , Yk ) is jointly Gaussian, so E[N0 |Y k ], which
is also the minimum mean squared error (MMSE) estimate,
is affine in Y k . Since Y k and N0 both have mean zero, it
is actually linear. Thus, Xk+1 = γk+1 (N0 − E[N0 |Y k ]) is
linear in N0 , Y k . Hence, (Y1 , . . . , Yk+1 = Xk+1 + Nk+1 )
is jointly Gaussian. By the orthogonality principle for linear
MMSE estimates, Xk+1 is independent of Yi for i ∈ [1 : k].
Furthermore, Nk+1 is also independent of Yi . Since Y k
are mutually independent, we conclude that (Y1 , . . . , Yk+1 )
is jointly Gaussian and uncorrelated. Thus, they are
mutually independent. It is also clear that E[Yk+1 ] = 0.
2
2
Furthermore, E[Yk+1
] = NS + σ 2 since E[Xk+1
] = NS
by construction and Xk+1 , Nk+1 are independent. Finally,
(N0 , Y1 , . . . , Yk+1 , Nk+2 , . . . , Nn ) is jointly Gaussian, so
we’re done.
We next expand I(N0 ; Y n ) in two different ways. First,
I(N0 ; Y n ) =
n
X
I(N0 ; Yi |Y i−1 )
i=1
=
n
X
h(Yi |Y i−1 ) − h(Yi |N0 , Y i−1 )
i=1
=
n
X
h(Yi ) − h(Ni |N0 , Y i−1 )
i=1
=
n
X
h(Yi ) − h(Ni )
i=1
n
NS
= log 1 + 2
2
σ
= nPH
where the third equality holds because Y n are mutually
independent and Yi is a function of Y i−1 , N0 , and Ni . PH is
Var Θn = E[(N0 − E[N0 |Y n ])2 ]
= E[E[(N0 − E[N0 |Y n ])2 |Y n ]]
= Var[N0 |Y n ],
where the second equality follows by the law of iterated
expectation. Thus, Θn ∼ N (θ(m), σ 2 2−2nPH ).
make a decoding error only pif |Θn − θ(m)| >
√ We −nR
NS 2
. Hence, pe ≤ 2Q(2n(PH −R) NS /σ 2 ), where
ˆ ∞
2
1
√ e−t /2 dt.
Q(x) ≡
2π
x
2
Now, we know that for x ≥ 1, Q(x) ≤ √12π e−x /2 [15], so if
R < PH and n is large enough,
r
2n(PH −R)
2
2
NS
pe ≤
exp −
π
2σ 2
Note that we used the channel n + 1 times, so the rate we
n
achieve is actually n+1
R.
| 7cs.IT
|
> REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR PAPER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (DOUBLE-CLICK HERE TO EDIT) <
1
Constrained Extreme Learning Machines: A
Study on Classification Cases
Wentao Zhu, Jun Miao, and Laiyun Qing
Abstract—Extreme learning machine (ELM) is an extremely
fast learning method and has a powerful performance for pattern
recognition tasks proven by enormous researches and engineers.
However, its good generalization ability is built on large numbers
of hidden neurons, which is not beneficial to real time response in
the test process. In this paper, we proposed new ways, named
“constrained extreme learning machines” (CELMs), to randomly
select hidden neurons based on sample distribution. Compared to
completely random selection of hidden nodes in ELM, the CELMs
randomly select hidden nodes from the constrained vector space
containing some basic combinations of original sample vectors.
The experimental results show that the CELMs have better
generalization ability than traditional ELM, SVM and some other
related methods. Additionally, the CELMs have a similar fast
learning speed as ELM.
Index Terms—Feedforward neural networks, extreme learning
machine, sample based learning, discriminative feature mapping.
I. INTRODUCTION
M
ANY neural network architectures have been developed
over the past several decades. The feedforward neural
networks are especially the most popular ones studied all
the times. It has been proven that the learning capacity of a
multilayer feedforward neural network with non-polynomial
activation functions can approximate any continuous function
[1]. Single hidden layer feedforward neural networks (SLFNs)
was studied and applied extensively by researches because of
their model simplicity and relatively high learning and
responding speed. The learning capacity of SLFNs is not
inferior to that of multilayer feedforward neural networks, as
proved in [2, 3]. There are mainly three different ways to train
the SLFNs:
1. Gradient based learning methods. The most famous
gradient based learning method is back-propagation
algorithm [4]. However, these methods may face quite
slow learning speed and stack into local minimal.
Although many assistant methods were proposed to
solve such problems, such as Levenberg-Marquardt
This work was supported in part by Natural Science Foundation of China
(Nos. 61175115 and 61272320) and President Fund of Graduate University of
Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. Y35101CY00).
W. Zhu and J. Miao are with the Key Lab of Intelligent Information
Processing of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Institute of Computing
Technology,
CAS,
Beijing
100190,
China
(e-mail:
[email protected]).
L. Qing is with School of Computer and Control Engineering, University of
Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
(LM) method [5], dynamically network construction [6],
evolutionary algorithms [7] and generic optimization [8],
the enhanced methods require heavy computation or
cannot obtain a global optimal solution.
2. Optimization based learning methods. One of the most
popular optimization based SLFNs is Support Vector
Machine (SVM) [9]. The objective function of SVM is
to optimize the weights for maximum margin
corresponding to structural risk minimization. The
solution of SVM can be obtained by convex
optimization methods in the dual problem space and is
the global optimal solution. SVM is a very popular
method attracting many researchers [10].
3. Least Mean Square (LMS) based methods, such as Radial
Basis Function network [11] and No-Prop network [12]
based on LMS algorithm [13]. These methods have quite
fast learning speed due to the essence of “No-Prop” and
fast learning speed of LMS.
In recent years, Huang et al. [14] proposed a novel extremely
fast learning model of SLFNs, called Extreme Learning
Machine (ELM). One of its salient essences that the weights
from the input layer to the hidden layer can be randomly
generated was firstly shown by Tamura et al. [2]. Huang et al.
[14] further completely proved the random feature mapping
theory rigorously.
After the random nonlinear feature mapping in the hidden
layer, the rest of ELM can be considered as a linear system [15].
Therefore, ELM has a closed form of solution due to the simple
network structure and random hidden layer weights. The
essence of the linear system used by ELM is to minimize the
training error and the norm of connection weights from the
hidden layer to the output layer at the same time [16]. Hence
ELM has a good generalization performance according to the
feedforward neural network theory [12, 17]. As a consequence,
ELM has some desirable features, such as that hidden layer
parameters need not be tuned, fast learning speed and good
generalization performance. Additionally, ELM has a unified
framework for classification, regression, semi-supervised,
supervised and unsupervised tasks [16, 18]. These advantages
lead to the popularity of ELM both for researchers and
engineers [19, 20, 21, 22, 54].
However, the random selection of hidden layer parameters
makes quite inefficient use of hidden nodes [23]. ELM usually
has to randomly generate a great number of hidden nodes to
achieve desirable performance. This leads to time consuming in
test process, which is not helpful in real applications. Large
numbers of hidden nodes also easily make the trained model
> REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR PAPER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (DOUBLE-CLICK HERE TO EDIT) <
stack into over fitting. There are mainly three ways to solve the
problem for a more compact model:
1. Use online incremental learning methods to add hidden
layer nodes dynamically [23, 24]. These methods
randomly generate parts or all of the hidden layer nodes,
and then select the candidate hidden nodes one by one or
chunk by chunk with fixed or varying chunk size.
Whether the hidden layer node is added or not is usually
depending on the objective function of the output layer.
2. Use pruning methods to select the candidate hidden layer
nodes [25, 26]. These methods start with a large neural
network using the traditional ELM, and then apply some
metrics, such as statistical criteria and multi-response
sparse regression, to rank these hidden nodes. Finally,
eliminate those low relevance hidden nodes to form a
more compact neural network structure.
3. Use gradient based methods to update the weights from
the input layer to the hidden layer in ELM [27]. After
randomly initialize the weights from the input layer to
the hidden layer and use a close-form least square
solution to calculate the weights from the hidden layer to
the output layer, these methods use the gradient
descending method to update the weights from the input
layer to the hidden layer in ELM iteratively.
The above methods can overcome the drawbacks of the
traditional ELM to some degree. However, they do not solve
the problem directly from the essence of hidden nodes. Besides,
these methods are somewhat time-consuming.
The essence of hidden layer functions is to map the data into
a feature space, where the output layer can use a linear classifier
to separate the data perfectly. Therefore, the hidden layer
should extract discriminative features or some other data
representations for classification tasks.
LDA [28] is probably the most commonly used method to
extract discriminative features. However, traditional LDA has
some drawbacks, such as that the number of feature-mapped
dimensions is less than the number of classes, “Small Sample
Size” (SSS) problem and Gaussian distribution assumption of
equal covariance and different means. Su et al. [29] proposed a
projection pursuit based LDA method to overcome these
problems. The method showed that the difference vectors of
between-class samples have a strong discriminative property
for classification tasks, but this method is rather complex with
many embedded trivial tricks.
In this work, to balance the high discriminative feature
learning and the fast training speed of the ELM, we propose a
novel model, called Constrained difference Extreme Learning
Machine (CDELM), which utilizes a random subset of
difference vectors of between-class samples to replace the
completely random connection weights from the input layer to
the hidden layer in ELM. More generally, the linear
combination of sample vectors, such as sum vectors of
within-class samples, sample vectors of all classes, sum vectors
of randomly selected sample vectors and the mixed vectors
including difference vectors of between-class samples and sum
vectors of within-class samples, as connection weights from the
input layer to the hidden layer are validated. We proposed
Constrained Sum Extreme Learning Machine (CSELM),
2
Sample Extreme Learning Machine (SELM), Random Sum
Extreme Learning Machine (RSELM) and Constrained Mixed
Extreme Learning Machine (CMELM) based on these
data-driven hidden layer features mapping ways. Experimental
results show that, CELMs has better generalization ability than
ELM related methods, SVM related methods and the BP neural
network, whilst retaining the fast learning characteristics of
ELM. We also compared the CELM algorithms with SVM and
ELM related algorithms [30, 31] on CIFAR-10 data set [32].
The results show that the CELM algorithms outperform these
methods.
The remaining part of the paper is organized as follows: in
section Ⅱ, we review the traditional ELM algorithm, and then
propose the CELMs in section Ⅲ. Experiments are presented in
section Ⅳ. Conclusion and discussion are given in section Ⅴ.
II. REVIEW OF EXTREME LEARNING MACHINE
ELM is a type of SLFNs. The hidden layer parameters, i.e.,
the connection weights from the input layer to the hidden nodes,
are randomly generated in ELM. The output layer is a linear
system, where the connection weights from the hidden layer to
the output layer are learned by computing the Moore-Penrose
generalized inverse [14]. The ELM network has an extreme
high learning speed due to the simple network structure and its
closed form solution. Additionally, the randomness makes
ELM not necessarily tune these hidden layer parameters
iteratively.
Fig. 1. Illustration of the structure of ELM neural network.
Given
the
training
samples
and
class
labels
> REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR PAPER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (DOUBLE-CLICK HERE TO EDIT) <
1, …, N } , the number of hidden
ℵ={(xi ,t i )|xi ∈ R n ,t i ∈ R m , i =
nodes L and activation function G (a, b, x) , where x ∈ R n is
the input vector, a ∈ R n is the associated connection weight
vector and b ∈ R is the bias, the algorithm of ELM network
can be summarized as the following three steps:
Step 1: Assign the parameters {(a j , b j ) | j = 1, , L} of
hidden nodes with randomly generated values.
Step 2: Calculate the hidden layer output matrix H for all the
training samples:
h(x1 ) G (a1 , b1 , x1 ) G (a L , bL , x1 )
H =
=
h(x N ) G (a1 , b1 , x N ) G (a L , bL , x N ) N × L
, where G (ai , bi , x j ) is the activation function of ith hidden node
for jth sample.
Step 3: Calculate the hidden layer’s output connection
weights β by solving the least squares problem:
3
generate a great number of hidden nodes to meet desirable
generalization performances. More hidden nodes mean more
processing time and more easily over fitting. These problems in
ELM should be solved.
Although the method [29] is rather complex with many
embedded trivial tricks, it shows that the difference vectors of
between-class samples are effective to classification tasks.
Considering the simplicity and the extreme high learning speed
of the ELM, we extend the ELM model to Constrained
Difference Extreme Learning Machine (CDELM) by
constraining the weight vector parameters {a j | j = 1, , L} of
ELM to be randomly drawn from a closed set of difference
vectors of between-class samples instead of from the open set
of arbitrary vectors to tackle the problem of generation of
discriminative hidden nodes. We use a simple case to illustrate
the idea of difference vectors of between-class samples.
Class1
β =H † T
, where H † is the generalized inverse matrix of the matrix H ,
t1T
.
and T=
T
t N
N ×m
However, the condition number of the random projected
matrix H may be very large and the above traditional ELM
model may encounter ill-posed problems [33]. In practice,
regularized term with hidden layer’s output connection weights
β is added into the optimization objective to avoid the
problem [34, 35, 36]. The solution of regularized ELM can be
obtained as
I
β =HT ( +HHT ) −1T
Class 2
(a)
λ
or β =(
I
λ
+HT H ) −1HT T
, where I is the identity matrix and λ is the regularization
factor which can be obtained by cross validation in the training
process.
(b)
As analyzed in theory and further verified by the
simulation results in [34], ELM for classification tends to
achieve better generalization performance than traditional
SVM. ELM can also overcome the local minimal problem that
BP neural nets faced, due to its convex model structure. The
learning speed of ELM is extremely fast at the same time.
III. CONSTRAINED EXTREME LEARNING MACHINES
In this section, we will introduce the CELMs with the idea of
using simple linear combination of sample vectors to generate
hidden nodes in the traditional ELM network structure.
A. Constrained Difference Extreme Learning Machine
The Constrained Difference Extreme Learning Machine
(SCELM) attempts to extract discriminative features in the
hidden layer. The completely random parameters in the hidden
layer of ELM do not always represent discriminative features.
Such unconstrained random parameters may make ELM has to
(c)
Fig. 2. Illustration of difference vectors of between-class samples. How to
generate the difference vectors is illustrated in (a). The completely random
connection weight vectors from the input layer to the hidden layer of ELM are
illustrated in (b). The constrained random weight vectors of CELM are
illustrated in (c).
The essence of the weight vectors from the input layer to the
neurons in the hidden layer is to map the original samples into a
discriminative feature space spanned by these vectors, where
the samples can be classified. The weight vectors are helpful for
classification if the directions of the weight vectors are from
> REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR PAPER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (DOUBLE-CLICK HERE TO EDIT) <
class 1 to class 2 or reversely, as illustrated in Fig. 1(a). The
blocks in the figure represent the samples in class 1, and the
circles represent the samples in class 2. As a comparison, the
weight vectors from the input layer to the hidden nodes in ELM
are completely random without constraints, as illustrated in Fig.
1(b). It can be inferred the weight vectors which do not follow
the direction from class 1 to class 2 are less discriminative for
classification tasks. This is the reason why not all the hidden
nodes in ELM are efficient or discriminative for classification
tasks.
We randomly generate the weight vectors from the input
layer to the hidden layer with the differences of between-class
samples as illustrated in Fig. 1(a). The difference vectors of
between-class samples can map the samples to a higher
Algorithm 1: Training of the Constrained
Difference Extreme Learning Machine (CDELM)
Input:
the
training
n
m
1, …, N } , the
samples ℵ={(xi ,t i )|xi ∈ R ,t i ∈ R , i =
hidden node number L and the activation
function G (w, b, x) .
Output: the model parameters of CELM, i.e., the
W
n× L and the bias vector b1× L from the
weight matrix
input layer to the hidden layer, the weight matrix
β L×m from the hidden layer to the output layer.
1) While the number of chosen difference vectors is
less than L
a) Randomly draw training samples xc1 and xc 2 from
any two different classes respectively and generate the
difference vector xc 2 − xc1 ;
b)
Normalize
the
w=
b=
difference
vector
by
2(x c 2 − x c1 )
x c 2 − x c1
, and calculate the corresponding bias
(x c1 + x c 2 )T (x c1 − x c 2 )
x c 2 − x c1
2
L2
.
W
weight matrix n× L and bias vector b1× L .
2) Calculate the hidden layer output matrix H as
G (a1 , b1 , x1 ) G (a L , bL , x1 )
G (a1 , b1 , x N ) G (a L , bL , x N ) N × L
.
3) Calculate the hidden layer’s output weight matrix
β L×m by solving the least squares problem:
β =H † T
†
1.
α xTc2 (xc 2 − xc1 ) + b =
We can obtain that the normalization factor α =
c) Use the vector w and bias b to construct the
h(x1 )
=
H =
h(x N )
discriminative feature space than ELM. The weight vectors
from the input layer to the hidden layer in CDELM are
illustrated in Fig. 1(c). The directions of these weight vectors
are close to the direction from class 1 to class 2, which are more
discriminative for the classification tasks intuitively.
We normalize the difference vectors as the weights from the
input layer to the hidden layer. The reason why normalize these
weights and how to normalize will be introduced in the
following discussion. In our originally Constrained Difference
Extreme Learning Machine [37], we deleted the difference
vectors of small norms and too relevant difference vectors.
These
pre-processing
operations
are
somewhat
time-consuming especially when the number of hidden nodes is
large. Although the two processes can improve the performance
[38], the improvement is very little in our experiments.
In CDELM, the prior information of samples’ class
distribution is utilized to generate the weights from the input
layer to the hidden layer. The aim is to split different classes’
samples into different areas in the feature space. The ideal case
is that, for example, class 1 is mapped into negative semi axis
and class 2 is mapped into positive semi axis in the feature
space. Hence the bias must be set as the middle point of the two
selected samples from the geometric sense intuitively. As a
result, the biases to the hidden neurons can be determined by
assuming that the samples from one class are mapped to -1 and
the samples from another class are mapped 1 respectively.
Denote x c1 and x c 2 as the samples drawn from two classes.
Then the weight vector w from the input layer to one hidden
neuron can be generated with α (x c 2 − x c1 ) , where α is the
normalized factor. The original data x is transformed to
xT w
=
+ b α xT (x c 2 − x c1 ) + b by feature mapping, where b is
the bias with respect to the weight vector w in ELM model.
The assumption that x c1 and x c 2 are mapped to -1 and 1 can be
written as
α xTc1 (x c 2 − xc1 ) + b =−1 , and
2
L2
4
, where H is the generalized inverse matrix
t1T
T=
t TN
N ×m .
and
and the corresponding bias b =
2
x c 2 − x c1
(x c1 + x c 2 )T (x c1 − x c 2 )
x c 2 − x c1
2
2
L2
by
L2
solving the above two equation constraints.
The commonly used activation function for hidden neurons
1
. The output layer in
is sigmoid function f ( x) =
1 + e− x
CDELM is a simple linear system as same as that of ELM.
From the above discussion, the training algorithm for
CDELM can be concluded in the Algorithm 1. The essence of
CDELM is to constrain the hidden neuron’s input connection
weights to be consistent with the directions from one class to
another class. So the random weights are constrained to be
chosen from the set that is composed of the difference vectors
of between-class samples.
> REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR PAPER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (DOUBLE-CLICK HERE TO EDIT) <
5
B. Sample Extreme Learning Machine
uniform distribution.
The Sample Extreme Learning Machine (SELM) utilizes
c) Use the vector w and bias b to construct the weight
sample vectors that are randomly drawn from the training set to
Wn× L and bias vector b1× L .
construct the weights from the input layer to the hidden layer. matrix
2) Calculate the hidden layer output matrix H as
The SELM firstly randomly selects a group of sample vectors,
h(x1 ) G (a1 , b1 , x1 ) G (a L , bL , x1 )
xi
, where xi is the
then normalizes these vectors as
=
2
H
=
xi L
2
h(x N ) G (a1 , b1 , x N ) G (a L , bL , x N ) N × L
.
chosen sample vector. After the normalization, the sample itself
can be transformed of norm 1 to serve the linear classification
in the output layer. The normalized sample vectors are assigned
as the weights from the input layer to the hidden layer. The
biases used in SELM are randomly generated from uniform
distribution as same as that in ELM.
The SELM model is a little like kernel based methods. If the
activation function is sigmoid function, we can formula the ith
hidden node in SELM as
1
(ai , bi , x) G=
(xi , bi , x)
G=
1 + exp[−(xi x + bi )]
, where x is one input vector, xi is the ith hidden node weight,
which is selected randomly from sample vectors. Actually,
K (xi , =
x) xi x + bi is a polynomial kernel function, which can
tackle some linearly inseparable cases, such as data sets of
quadratic curve. The difference between the kernel used here
and SVM kernel is that, the samples in the SVM kernel function
is the support vectors. The difference between kernel ELM [16]
and our SELM is that ELM kernel uses all the training samples.
The sigmoidal activation function used is to stretch the kernel
mapped data and helps the linear classification in the output
layer.
From the above discussion, we can write the SELM algorithm
as Algorithm 2. The essence of SELM is to constrain the hidden
neuron’s input connection weights to be consistent with the
directions of sample vectors. So the original random weights
are constrained to be chosen from the training set.
Algorithm 2: Training of the Sample Extreme
Learning Machine (SELM)
Input:
the
training
n
m
1, …, N } , the
samples ℵ={(xi ,t i )|xi ∈ R ,t i ∈ R , i =
hidden
node number
function G (w, b, x) .
L
and
the
activation
Output: the model parameters of SELM, i.e., the weight
Wn× L and the bias vector b1× L from the input layer
matrix
to the hidden layer, the weight matrix β L×m from the hidden
layer to the output layer.
1) While the number of chosen sample vectors is less
than L
a) Randomly draw samples xi from the training data;
b) Normalize the sample vector by w =
xi
xi
2
, and
L2
draw the corresponding bias b randomly from [0,1]
3) Calculate the hidden layer’s output weight matrix
β L×m by solving the least squares problem:
β =H † T
†
where H is the
t1T
T=
t TN
N ×m .
and
,
generalized
inverse
matrix
C. Constrained Sum Extreme Learning Machine
The Constrained Sum Extreme Learning Machine (CSELM)
utilizes sum vectors of random chosen within-class sample
vectors to construct the weights from the input layer to hidden
layer. The CSELM firstly randomly selects any two
within-class sample vectors x c′ and x c′′ , calculate the sum of
the two vectors x c′ + x c′′ , then normalizes the sum vector as
x c′ + x c′′
x c′ + x c′′
2
. The normalized sum sample vectors are
L2
assigned as the weights from the input layer to the hidden layer.
The biases used in CSELM are also randomly generated from
the uniform distribution as same as that in ELM. The
constrained sum vectors used here were firstly inspired by the
difference vectors of between-class samples. The constrained
sum vectors also can be considered as some derivative samples,
which can somewhat weaken the affection of noise samples in
CSELM.
From the above discussion, we can design the SELM
algorithm as Algorithm 3. The essence of CSELM is to
constrain the hidden neuron’s input connection weights to be
consistent with the directions of derivative robust sample
vectors. So the random weights are constrained to be chosen
from the set that is composed of the sum vectors of within-class
sample vectors.
Algorithm 3: Training of the Constrained Sum Extreme
Learning Machine (CSELM)
Input:
the
training
1, …, N } , the
samples ℵ={(xi ,t i )|xi ∈ R ,t i ∈ R , i =
hidden node number L and the activation
n
m
function G (w, b, x) .
Output: the model parameters of CSELM, i.e., the
> REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR PAPER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (DOUBLE-CLICK HERE TO EDIT) <
W
weight matrix n× L and the bias vector b1× L from the
input layer to the hidden layer, the weight matrix
β L×m from the hidden layer to the output layer.
1) While the number of chosen constrained sum
vectors is less than L
a) Randomly draw training samples x c′ and xc′′ from
the same class respectively and generate the sum vector
x c′ + x c′′ ;
b) Normalize the sum vector by w =
x c′ + x c′′
x c′ + x c′′
2
, and
L2
draw the corresponding bias b randomly from [0,1]
uniform distribution.
c) Use the vector w and bias b to construct the
W
weight matrix n× L and bias vector b1× L .
2) Calculate the hidden layer output matrix H as
h(x1 )
H =
=
h(x N )
6
Algorithm 4: Training of the Random Sample Extreme
Learning Machine (RSELM)
Input:
the
training
n
m
1, …, N } , the
samples ℵ={(xi ,t i )|xi ∈ R ,t i ∈ R , i =
hidden
node
number L
and
the
activation
G
(
w
,
b
,
x
)
function
.
Output: the model parameters of CELM, i.e., the weight
Wn× L and the bias vector b1× L from the input layer
matrix
to the hidden layer, the weight matrix β L×m from the hidden
layer to the output layer.
1) While the number of chosen random sum vectors is less
than L
a) Randomly draw training samples x′ and x′′ from data
samples;
x′ + x′′
b) Normalize the difference vector by w =
, and
2
x′ + x′′
L2
G (a1 , b1 , x1 ) G (a L , bL , x1 )
G (a1 , b1 , x N ) G (a L , bL , x N ) N × L
.
draw the corresponding bias b randomly from [0,1]
uniform distribution.
c) Use the vector w and bias b to construct the weight
W
matrix n× L and bias vector b1× L .
2) Calculate the hidden layer output matrix H as
h(x1 ) G (a1 , b1 , x1 ) G (a L , bL , x1 )
=
H =
matrix
h(x N ) G (a1 , b1 , x N ) G (a L , bL , x N ) N × L
3) Calculate the hidden layer’s output weight matrix
β L×m by solving the least squares problem:
β =H † T
†
, where H is the
t1T
T=
t TN
N ×m .
and
generalized
inverse
3) Calculate the hidden layer’s output weight matrix β L×m
by solving the least squares problem:
β =H † T
D. Random Sum Extreme Learning Machine
The Random Sum Extreme Learning Machine (RSELM)
utilizes sum vectors of random sample vectors regardless of
classes to construct the weights from the input layer to the
hidden layer. The RSELM firstly randomly selects any two
sample vectors x′ and x′′ , calculate the sum of the two vectors
x′ + x′′
2
x′ + x′′
. The
L2
normalized sum vectors are assigned as the weights from input
layer to the hidden layer. The biases used in RSELM are also
randomly generated from the uniform distribution as same as
that in ELM. The sum vectors of random samples used here is
to accelerate the speed of hidden layer weights generation.
From the above discussion, we can design the RSELM
algorithm as Algorithm 4. The essence of RSELM is to
constrain the hidden neuron’s input connection weights to be
consistent with the sum vectors of random samples.
†
where H is
t1T
T=
t TN
N ×m .
and
,
x′ + x′′ , then normalizes the sum vector as
.
the
generalized
inverse
matrix
E. Constrained Mixed Extreme Learning Machine
The Constrained Mixed Extreme Learning Machine
(CMELM) utilizes mixed vectors, containing class-constrained
difference vectors and class-constrained sum vectors, to
construct the weights from the input layer to the hidden layer.
The CMELM firstly generates half numbers of hidden nodes
whose weights and biases are constructed with constrained sum
vectors, then generates the others whose weights and biases are
constructed with constrained difference vectors. The
constrained sum vectors are normalized as same as that of
CSELM, and the constrained difference vectors are normalized
as same as that of CDELM. The normalized sum sample
vectors are assigned as the weights from the input layer to the
hidden layer. The constrained mixed vectors can be considered
> REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR PAPER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (DOUBLE-CLICK HERE TO EDIT) <
7
as model average (the average model of CDELM and CSELM)
h(x1 ) G (a1 , b1 , x1 ) G (a L , bL , x1 )
because of the linear property of the output layer.
H =
=
From the above discussion, we can design the CMELM
h(x N ) G (a1 , b1 , x N ) G (a L , bL , x N ) N × L
algorithm as Algorithm 5.
.
Algorithm 5: Training of the Constrained Mixed Extreme
3) Calculate the hidden layer’s output weight matrix β L×m
Learning Machine (CMELM)
by solving the least squares problem:
Input:
the
training
β =H † T
n
m
={(
,
)|
,
,
1,
,
}
ℵ
x
t
x
∈
R
t
∈
R
i
=
…
N
i
i
i
i
†
samples
, the
, where H is the generalized inverse matrix
hidden
node
number L
and
the
activation
t1T
G
(
w
,
b
,
x
)
function
.
T=
Output: the model parameters of CELM, i.e., the weight
t TN
N ×m .
W
b
and
n× L and the bias vector 1× L from the input layer
matrix
to the hidden layer, the weight matrix β L×m from the hidden
layer to the output layer.
1) While the number of constrained sum vectors is less than
L / 2
a) Randomly draw training samples x c′ and xc′′ from
the same class and generate the sum vector xc′ + xc′′ ;
b) Normalize the sum vector by w =
x c′ + x c′′
x c′ + x c′′
2
, and
L2
draw the corresponding bias b randomly from [0,1]
uniform distribution.
c) Use the vector w and bias b to construct the
weight matrix Wn×( L / 2 ) and bias vector b1×( L / 2 ) .
2) While the number of chose difference vectors is less than
L − L / 2
a) Randomly draw training samples xc1 and xc 2 from
any two different classes respectively and generate the
difference vector xc 2 − xc1 ;
b)
Normalize
the
w=
b=
difference
vector
by
2(x c 2 − x c1 )
x c 2 − x c1
2
L2
, and calculate the corresponding bias
(x c1 + x c 2 ) (x c1 − x c 2 )
T
x c 2 − x c1
2
L2
.
c) Use the vector w and bias b to construct the
weight matrix Wn×( L − L / 2 ) and bias vector b1×( L − L / 2 ) .
2) Concatenate the above Wn×( L / 2 ) and Wn×( L − L / 2 ) to
form the hidden layer nodes weights, and concatenate the
b1×( L / 2 ) and b1×( L − L / 2 ) to form the hidden layer nodes
biases. Calculate the hidden layer output matrix H as
IV. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
In this section, we evaluate the proposed CELMs and
compare it with some classifiers, such as ELM, SVM and some
related deep learning methods, on both synthetic and real-world
datasets. Ten rounds of experiments are conducted for each
data set. In each experiment, the training set and the test set are
randomly generated using the samples from synthetic datasets
and UCI database [39]. The samples from UCI database are
normalized to be of zero mean and unit variance. The
performances are recorded with the means and the standard
deviations of classification accuracies.
In these experiments, we also compare the CELMs with the
orthogonal ELM [40], which makes weight vectors orthogonal
to each other and biases orthogonal to each other. The aim of
this comparison is to compare CELMs with other ELM related
methods appeared in literature sufficiently. The code of ELM
used in the experiments was downloaded from [14]. In the
following figures, the red solid performance curve stands for
ELM performance, the green solid curve stands for orthogonal
ELM performance, the blue solid curve stands for CDELM
performance, the blue dashed curve with triangle markers
stands for SELM performance, the brilliant blue solid curve
stands for CSELM performance, the brilliant blue dashed curve
with triangle markers stands for RSELM performance and the
black solid curve stands for CMELM performance. The
software used in the experiments is MATLAB R2010a with the
Microsoft Windows Serve 2003 operation system. The
configuration of hardware is Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5440
@2.83GHz. The total RAM of the server is 32.0 GB, but the
experiments cannot take up too much due to other users’ usage.
A. Experiments on Synthetic Dataset
We first evaluate our CELM algorithms on the synthetic
dataset of the spiral data. It is illustrated in Fig. 3. To retain the
symmetrical shape of the spiral, we normalize the samples into
the range [-1, 1] as same as that in [14]. The total number of
such generated spiral data is 5000. Two thirds of data samples
are used as training set and the rest are used as test set. These
data samples are randomly drawn from original spiral data
samples. The two sets are randomly generated in each one of
the total ten rounds of experiments.
> REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR PAPER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (DOUBLE-CLICK HERE TO EDIT) <
8
WDBC
1
0.98
0.96
Testing accuracy
0.5
0
-0.5
0.94
0.92
0.9
ELM
Orthogonal ELM
CDELM
CSELM
SELM
RSELM
CMELM
0.88
0.86
-1
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0.84
0
20
10
Spirals
30
40
The number of hidden nodes
50
60
70
MDD-fac
1
0.95
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0
50
100
The number of hidden nodes
ELM
Orthogonal ELM
CDELM
CSELM
SELM
RSELM
CMELM
150
Testing accuracy
Testing accuracy
0.9
0.85
0.8
ELM
Orthogonal ELM
CDELM
CSELM
SELM
RSELM
CMELM
80
90
100
0.75
0.7
0.65
0
10
20
30
Fig. 3. The spiral synthetic dataset is illustrated at the top side. The
performance comparisons are shown at the bottom side.
40
50
60
70
The number of hidden nodes
MDD-fou
0.8
0.7
Testing accuracy
As shown in Fig. 2, CELMs have a perfect performance
when the number of hidden nodes reaches a slight larger than
50, while orthogonal ELM drops when the number of hidden
nodes is larger than 50. The drop of orthogonal ELM is
probably because the orthogonalization in two vectors of 50
dimensions is of no help, even degrades the information in the
random weights. The test accuracy of ELM only reaches 0.8
even when the number of hidden nodes is 150. The test
accuracies of CELMs are above those of orthogonal ELM and
ELM all the time. The result shows that CELMs have the better
generalization abilities than orthogonal ELM and ELM.
Besides, the variances of these CELMs are becoming quite
small with the increase of hidden nodes number and there is
little difference among the performances of these CELMs.
Therefore, the difference vectors and sample vectors really
work from the performance comparison between CELMs and
orthogonal ELM and ELM.
0.75
0.65
0.6
0.55
0.5
ELM
Orthogonal ELM
CDELM
CSELM
SELM
RSELM
CMELM
50
60
0.45
0.4
0.35
0
10
20
30
40
The number of hidden nodes
MDD-kar
0.9
0.8
Testing accuracy
We compare the performances of CELMs with ELM and
orthogonal ELM. The number of hidden nodes is selected from
10 to 150 at a step 10. The performances of these models are
illustrated in Fig. 2.
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0
10
20
30
40
50
The number of hidden nodes
60
ELM
Orthogonal ELM
CDELM
CSELM
SELM
RSELM
CMELM
70
80
> REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR PAPER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (DOUBLE-CLICK HERE TO EDIT) <
MDD-pix
0.95
Testing accuracy
0.9
0.85
0.8
0.75
0.7
0
20
40
60
140
120
100
80
The number of hidden nodes
ELM
Orthogonal ELM
CDELM
CSELM
SELM
RSELM
CMELM
200
180
160
MDD-zer
0.84
0.82
Testing accuracy
0.8
0.78
0.76
0.74
0.72
0.7
0.68
0.66
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
The number of hidden nodes
ELM
Orthogonal ELM
CDELM
CSELM
SELM
RSELM
CMELM
160
180
200
Fig. 4. Experimental results of ELM, orthogonal ELM and CELMs on
the six UCI datasets.
B. Experiments on UCI Datasets
Six datasets from UCI database [39], including Wisconsin
diagnostic breast cancer dataset (WDBC) and digit datasets in
five different features (MDD-fac, fou, kar, pix, zer), are used
for evaluating the proposed CELMs. CELMs are compared
with ELM, orthogonal ELM.
In the first experiment, the number of training samples is 2/3
size of the total samples, and the rest is used as test samples.
The training and test sets are randomly generated. The
comparison of ELM, CELMs and orthogonal ELM in the first
experiment is illustrated in Fig. 3. The performances of these
models are displayed sufficiently from the trends of the curves
in the figure. It can be seen that the test accuracy curves of
CELMs are above those of other two methods in the experiment
and so the generalization ability of the proposed CELMs is
better than other two models on these real world datasets. The
samples’ distribution prior we introduced makes the efficient
use of hidden nodes in CELMs and really helps the
classification tasks.
In the second experiment, a benchmark performance
evaluation is conducted on the six datasets. The size of the
training set is also 2/3 of the total samples and the remaining
9
data is used as the test set. We compare our methods with the
regularized ELM, regularized orthogonal ELM, BP network
and linear SVM methods. It should be mentioned that the
optimization objectives of ELM, orthogonal ELM and CELMs
used in the benchmark evaluation are all added a regularized
term. Three-fold cross validation is used to select the best
regularization factor in log10 space from -8 to 8 with the step 1.
The number of hidden nodes used in ELM, orthogonal ELM,
CELMs and BP network is from 5 to 200 with the step 5 in five
MDD data sets. And in WDBC data set, the number of hidden
nodes used is from 5 to 100 with the step 5. The selection of
hidden nodes number is based on the Fig. 3. Although it is
unfair for those methods that are not converged completely, the
aim of the proposed methods is to improve the efficiency of
hidden neurons. Due to no kernels used in ELM, the SVM used
here is linear SVM. The cost factor used in SVM is selected as
same as the regularization factor in ELM. The performances of
ten rounds of experiments are recorded. The mean of test
accuracies and training times are recorded in Table I. The best
test accuracies are represented in bold face.
The training method of BP neural network is RPROP [41] due
to time and memory problems in the experiments. The liner
SVM code used is the MATLAB code obtained from [43].
It can be seen from the Table I that the performances of most
CELMs outperform those of other methods. The CELMs
improve the performance significantly, whilst retaining the
extremely high learning speed of ELM.
C. Experiments on Large Scale Datasets
We also evaluate the CELMs and ELM on two large size
datasets, i.e., MNIST [42] and CIFAR-10 [32]. The MNIST
database of handwritten digits contains a training set of 60,000
samples, and a test set of 10,000 samples. It consists of binary
images of ten classes and the size of these digits is 28×28
pixels. The samples are normalized before input to the CELMs
and ELM. The CIFAR-10 dataset contains 60,000 color images
in 10 classes, with 6000 image per class. The training set and
the test set consist of 50,000 images and 10,000 images
respectively. In CIFAR-10 dataset, the standard evaluation
pipeline defined in [43] is adopted. First, extract dense 6 × 6
local patches with ZCA whitening and the stride is 1. Second,
use threshold coding with α =0.25 to encode. The codebook is
trained with OMP-1 [44] and the codebook size is 50 in the
experiment. Third, average-pool the features on a 2 × 2 grid to
form the global image representation.
The performances of CELMs, ELM and orthogonal ELM are
illustrated in Fig. 4. In this experiment, these methods are
implemented without regularized terms for the sake of
evaluating the efficiency of hidden neurons sufficiently.
> REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR PAPER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (DOUBLE-CLICK HERE TO EDIT) <
10
From Fig. 4, it can be learned the performances of CELMs are
about 8 percentages higher than those of ELM averagely on the
two datasets. The efficiency of the sample vectors based
weighting adopted by SELM can be evaluated as follows.
When the same numbers of vectors are used, the method with
higher test accuracy means more efficient. In Fig. 4, the
performances of CELMs are higher than that of orthogonal
ELM when they are not converged. The gaps between the
performances of CELMs and orthogonal ELM show that the
sample vector based weighting is effective. The curve of
DATASETS
ELM
Orthogonal ELM
Constrained Difference ELM
Constrained Sum ELM
Sample ELM
Random Sum ELM
Constrained Mixed ELM
BP
Linear SVM
Test accuracy
Training time(s)
Test accuracy
Training time(s)
Test accuracy
Training time(s)
Test accuracy
Training time(s)
Test accuracy
Training time(s)
Test accuracy
Training time(s)
Test accuracy
Training time(s)
Test accuracy
Training time(s)
Test accuracy
Training time(s)
WDBC
MDD-fac
MDD-fou
MDD-kar
MDD-pix
MDD-zer
0.974
0.01
0.969
0.01
0.973
0.02
0.975
0.02
0.973
0.02
0.974
0.01
0.974
0.03
0.972
0.97
0.628
0.73
0.958
0.03
0.976
0.07
0.975
0.05
0.977
0.07
0.978
0.04
0.977
0.04
0.977
0.07
0.616
3.69
0.965
12.37
0.805
0.03
0.807
0.04
0.839
0.04
0.84
0.07
0.84
0.03
0.84
0.03
0.84
0.07
0.428
3.80
0.827
0.43
0.923
0.03
0.937
0.05
0.953
0.04
0.964
0.08
0.964
0.03
0.963
0.03
0.963
0.07
0.416
4.27
0.950
0.151
0.934
0.03
0.942
0.08
0.961
0.05
0.973
0.08
0.970
0.04
0.970
0.04
0.971
0.08
0.525
5.33
0.965
2.88
0.809
0.04
0.827
0.04
0.833
0.04
0.838
0.07
0.841
0.03
0.836
0.03
0.836
0.06
0.378
4.98
0.831
1.41
MNIST
0.96
0.94
Testing accuracy
0.92
0.9
0.88
0.86
0.84
0.82
0.8
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
The number of hidden nodes
ELM
Orthogonal ELM
CDELM
CSELM
SELM
RSELM
CMELM
800
900
1000
(a)
CIFAR-10
0.65
Testing accuracy
0.6
0.55
ELM
Orthogonal ELM
CDELM
CSELM
SELM
RSELM
CMELM
0.5
0.45
0.4
0
100
200
400
300
The number of hidden nodes
500
600
(b)
Fig. 5. Experimental results of ELM, orthogonal ELM and CELMs on
the subsets of MNIST and CIFAR-10 datasets.
700
CELMs’ performance is always above those of orthogonal
ELM and ELM in all these datasets, which shows that sample
vectors based weighting really helps the efficient use of hidden
nodes.
Experiments are conducted on MNIST data set to compare
CELMs with ELM, orthogonal ELM and Multi-Layer Extreme
Learning Machine (ML-ELM) [40]. The ML-ELM is a Stacked
Denoising Auto Encoder (SDAE) model [46] based on ELM.
The random feature mapping is used as encoder in ELM and the
linear system is used as decoder. The original ML-ELM with
three layers of hidden nodes 700-700-15000 can outperform
other deep learning methods, such as Deep Belief Network
(DBN) [48], Deep Boltzmann Machine (DBM) [48], Stacked
Auto Encoder (SAE) and SDAE [46]. In our experiment, the
network structure of ML-ELM is set to 700-700-1000 due to
the limit of our machine capacity. And the number of hidden
nodes used in ELM, orthogonal ELM and CELMs is set to 1000
and 2000 for evaluation. In the experiments, regularization
term is used for ELM, orthogonal ELM and CELMs. The
parameter selection is the same as before. The average
performance is recorded in Table Ⅱ.
From Table Ⅱ , it can be learned when the number of
CELMs’ hidden nodes is 1000, the test accuracies of CELMs
are comparable to ML-ELM, but CELMs have much high
learning speed. When the number of CELMs’ hidden nodes is
2000, the CELMs outperform the ML-ELM of our
implemented version. But the learning speed of CELMs is
slower due to the computation complexity of matrix inversion.
From the significant performance gap between ELM and
CELMs and the similar learning speed of ELM and CELMs, we
can conclude the sample based features used in CELMs really
help the improvement, whilst retaining fast learning property of
> REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR PAPER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (DOUBLE-CLICK HERE TO EDIT) <
ELM.
The CELMs are also compared with SVM related methods,
e.g., Linear SVM and R2SVM [30], and deep ELM related
method, e.g., DCN [31], on CIFAR-10 dataset. The R2SVM is a
deep learning model and its building block is a linear SVM
model. The outputs of the previous layers are transformed by a
random matrix, and then the transformed outputs are added to
the original features. The modified features are input into the
next layer after transformed by a sigmoid function. The DCN is
also a deep learning model, but its building block is an ELM
based model, in which parts of the hidden nodes are built with
random projection and the other part of hidden nodes are built
with RBM weights [31, 45]. Instead of the way that adds the
output of previous layer as a bias to the next layer, the outputs
of the previous layers are concatenated with the original
features sequentially and are input into the next layer in DCN
model.
In this experiment, all the 50,000 training samples are used to
train the model, and all the 10,000 test samples are used to
evaluate the performance. Table Ⅲ shows the performances of
ELM, orthogonal ELM, CELMs, linear-SVM, R2SVM [30] and
DCN [31] methods. Note the performances of linear SVM,
R2SVM and DCN are cited from [30]. And the experimental
conditions of ELM, orthogonal ELM and CELMs, such as the
features and the number of used training and test sets, are the
same with [30].
TABLE I
AVERAGE CLASSIFICATION ACCURACIES ON UCI DATASETS
TABLE Ⅱ
PERFORMANCE ON MNIST DATASET
Training
Time(s)
1000 nodes
1000 nodes
Test
accuracy
0.930
0.934
1000 nodes
0.963
34.46
1000 nodes
1000 nodes
1000 nodes
1000 nodes
2000 nodes
2000 nodes
0.964
0.964
0.963
0.964
0.947
0.957
35.47
35.32
35.94
36.46
107.25
110.99
107.51
Algorithms
No. of hidden nodes
ELM
Orthogonal ELM
Constrained Difference
ELM
Constrained Sum ELM
Sample ELM
Random Sum ELM
Constrained Mixed ELM
ELM
Orthogonal ELM
Constrained Difference
ELM
Constrained Sum ELM
Sample ELM
Random Sum ELM
Constrained Mixed ELM
Multi-Layer ELM
(ML-ELM)
35.39
37.73
2000 nodes
0.974
2000 nodes
2000 nodes
2000 nodes
2000 nodes
2400 nodes
(700-700-1000)
0.973
0.974
0.973
0.976
107.16
106.91
108.16
106.20
0.968
58.23
TABLE Ⅲ
PERFORMANCE ON CIFAR-10 DATASET
Algorithms
Linear SVM
R2SVM
DCN
ELM
Orthogonal ELM
Constrained Difference
ELM
Constrained Sum ELM
No. of hidden layers
/nodes
60 layers
Tens to hundreds layers
7000 nodes
7000 nodes
Test
accuracy
0.647
0.693
0.672
0.645
0.683
7000 nodes
0.720
7000 nodes
0.728
Sample ELM
Random Sum ELM
Constrained Mixed ELM
7000 nodes
7000 nodes
7000 nodes
11
0.733
0.727
0.723
From the Table Ⅲ, the CELMs can be found to have the
better performances than that of linear-SVM, DCN and R2SVM.
The CELMs have the test accuracies of at least 8 percentages
higher than that of linear SVM. In [30], the R2SVM has 60
layers, and each layer is a linear SVM after random projection
and sigmoid transformation. Although R2SVM and DCN have
many layers, the CELMs of one hidden layer have the test
accuracy of at least 3 percentages higher than that of these
discriminative deep learning methods. Besides, the CELMs can
train a model at a case of 50,000 training data well, which
suggests that the proposed CELMs can tackle large scale data
effectively.
To further understand the feature mapping of ELM,
orthogonal ELM and the CELMs, the last experiment is
conducted for the visualization of the hidden layer’s feature
mapping of these methods on MNIST data set. The
visualization method, t-SNE [49], is used. The t-SNE is a very
ideal visualization tool due to preserving local structure and
overcoming the “crowding” problem of mapped data. The
s-SNE has a much better visualization effect than other
methods, such as PCA [38], LLE [50] and Auto Encoder [47],
on MNIST data set. In the experiment, the whole 60,000
training data are used as training set and 2000 data are
randomly selected from 10,000 test data to be used as the test
set in t-SNE. The number of hidden nodes in ELM, orthogonal
ELM and CELMs is 10,000. The visualization is illustrated in
Fig. 5.
Seen from the figure, our CELMs can retain the data
structure well with the pre-assigned iteration number. The
hidden layer’s feature mapping in CELMs can separate the data
of different classes well. However, after the transformation of
10,000 hidden neurons in ELM and orthogonal ELM, the input
data do not converge after many iterations in t-SNE
visualization. The phenomenon probably reveals the essence
that the constrained random mapping hidden neurons may
outperform the completely random hidden neurons in
traditional ELMs. It also provides new insights into ELM
related research that fast generation of meaningful hidden
neurons could boost ELM’s performance greatly.
> REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR PAPER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (DOUBLE-CLICK HERE TO EDIT) <
MNIST Test Data
12
MNIST Test Data in Constrained Sum Vectors Feature Space
80
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
60
40
20
0
-20
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
60
40
20
0
-20
-40
-40
-60
-60
-80
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
-60
-40
`
-20
0
20
40
60
MNIST Test Data in Sample Vectors Feature Space
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
60
MNIST Test Data in Orthogonal ELM Feature Space
1000
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
800
600
400
200
0
-200
-400
40
20
0
-20
-40
-60
-600
-80
-800
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
-1000
-1000
-800
-600
-400
-200
0
200
400
600
800
1000
MNIST Test Data in Random Sum Vectors Feature Space
MNIST Test Data in Constrained Difference Vectors Feature Space
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
60
80
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
60
40
20
0
-20
40
20
0
-20
-40
-40
-60
-60
-80
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
60
MNIST Test Data in Constrained Mixed Vectors Feature Space
80
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
60
40
20
0
-20
-40
-60
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
Fig. 6. ELM, orthogonal ELM and the CELMs hidden layer feature
visualization on MNIST dataset.
80
> REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR PAPER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (DOUBLE-CLICK HERE TO EDIT) <
V. DISCUSSION
We have compared CELMs with several ELM based
methods, such as normalized ELM [37], orthogonal ELM, and
ELM. The main contributions of the CELMs to the ELM study
are, 1) we introduce a constrained hidden weights based on
sample distributions, 2) we normalized the hidden weights by
the square of their l2 norms, other than l2 norm (The normalized
ELM is taken the strategy.). Several work have validated the
effectiveness of CELMs [53].
From the experiments of CELMs, we observe that when the
number of hidden nodes is small, the CELMs are outperform
normalized ELM, orthogonal ELM and ELM greatly. However,
when the number of hidden nodes is large, the margins between
the ELM and normalized ELM are not that big. From the
observation, the constrained weights and normalized strategy
both work for the success of CELMs.
On one hand, when the number of hidden nodes is small, the
hidden layer is equivalent to dimension reduction. Thus the
directions of hidden weights are quite import since they
represent the directions to be retained after the reduction. The
weights based on sample distribution work well for the
dimension reduction [52].
On the other hand, the normalization of hidden weights is
important due to the property of sigmoid activation function.
The effective response area of sigmoid function is near the zero.
When the weights are not normalized and the dimension of
inputs is high, the absolute values of many elements in WX+b
are very big. Thus the normalization is quite import. And we
strongly recommend the operator will be added in the research
of ELM in the future.
VI. CONCLUSION
To address the inefficient use of hidden nodes in ELM, this
paper proposed the novel learning models, CELMs. The
CELMs constrain its random weights’ generation from a
smaller space compared to that of the ELM, i.e., replacing the
completely random weight vectors with ones that are randomly
drawn from the set of simple linear combination of sample
vectors. The main contribution of CELMs is that it introduces
sample distribution prior into the construction of the hidden
layer to make a better feature mapping and benefit the next
layer’s linear classification. The effective feature mapping
greatly contributes the efficient use of hidden nodes in ELM.
Extensive comparisons between CELMs and some related
methods on both synthetic and real-world datasets showed that
CELMs have better performances in almost all the cases.
However, the CELMs still have some problems that typical
ELM owned. One is that CELMs face the over fitting problem
when the number of hidden nodes is very large, although
CELMs improve the effective use of discriminative hidden
nodes. To our relief, the methods in [34, 35, 51] can tackle the
problem effectively. Another problem is that the solving of the
weights from the hidden layer to the output layer is
time-consuming when the number of hidden nodes is very large.
This case is much common in large scale applications. Some
13
gradient based solving methods for linear system can tackle the
problem iteratively.
The further research will include the study of invariant
feature generating for the improvement of CELMs and the
experimental verification on CELMs’ application to regression
problems. The analyses on what kinds of problems that the
CELMs will work with and such related theories are also
expected to be studied in the future.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors would like to thank Dr. L. L. C. Kasun, Dr. H.
Zhou, Prof. G.-B. Huang from Nanyang Technological
University, Singapore and Prof. C. M. Vong from University of
Macau, Macau for their kindly help with Multi-Layer Extreme
Learning Machine (ML-ELM).
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
M. Leshno, V. Ya. Lin, A. Pinkus and S. Schocken, “Multilayer
feedforward networks with a nonpolynomial activation function can
approximate any function,” Neural Networks, vol. 6(6), pp. 861–867,
1993.
S. Tamura and M. Tateishi, “Capabilities of a four-layered feedforward
neural network: four layers versus three,” IEEE Trans. Neural Networks,
vol. 8(2), pp. 251–255, 1997.
G.-B. Huang and H.A. Babri, “Upper bounds on the number of hidden
neurons in feedforward networks with arbitrary bounded nonlinear
activation functions,” IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, vol. 9(1), pp.
224–229, 1998.
P. Werbos, “Beyond regression: new tools for prediction and analysis in
the behavioral sciences,” Ph.D. Thesis Harvard University, Cambridge,
MA, 1974.
J. J. Moré, “The Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm: implementation and
theory,” In Numerical analysis, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 105-116,
1978.
E. D. Karnin, “A simple procedure for pruning back-propagation trained
neural networks,” IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, vol. 1(2), pp. 239-242,
1990.
X. Yao, “Evolving artificial neural networks,” Proceedings of the IEEE,
vol. 87(9), pp. 1423-1447, 1999.
F. Z. Brill, D. E. Brown and W. N. Martin, “Fast generic selection of
features for neural network classifiers,” IEEE Trans. Neural Networks,
vol. 3(2), pp. 324-328, 1992.
C. Cortes and V. Vapnik, “Support-vector networks,” Machine learning,
vol. 20(3), pp. 273-297, 1995.
Y. Xia and J. Wang, “A one-layer recurrent neural network for support
vector machine learning,” IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. B, Cybern.,
vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 1261–1269, 2004.
D. Lowe, “Adaptive radial basis function nonlinearities, and the problem
of generalization,” In First IEE International Conference on Artificial
Neural Networks (Conf. Publ. No. 313), IET, pp. 171-175, October, 1989.
B. Widrow, A. Greenblatt, Y. Kim and D. Park, “The No-Prop algorithm:
A new learning algorithm for multilayer neural networks,” Neural
Networks, vol. 37, pp. 182-188, 2013.
B. Widrow and M. E. Hoff, “Adaptive switching circuits,” In IRE
WESCON Convention Record, 1960.
G.-B. Huang, Q.-Y. Zhu and C.-K. Siew, “Extreme learning machine:
Theory and applications,” Neurocomputing, vol. 70 (1–3), pp. 489–501,
Dec.
2006,
[Code:
http://www.ntu.edu.sg/home/egbhuang/elm_
random_hidden_nodes.html].
G.-B. Huang, Q.-Y. Zhu and C.-K. Siew, “Extreme learning machine: A
new learning scheme of feedforward neural networks,” in Proceedings of
International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN2004), vol. 2,
(Budapest, Hungary), pp. 985–990, 25-29 Jul., 2004.
G.-B. Huang, H. Zhou, X. Ding and R. Zhang, “Extreme learning
machine for regression and multiclass classification,” IEEE Transactions
> REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR PAPER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (DOUBLE-CLICK HERE TO EDIT) <
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
[26]
[27]
[28]
[29]
[30]
[31]
[32]
[33]
[34]
[35]
[36]
[37]
[38]
[39]
on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, vol. 42(2), pp.
513-529, 2012.
P. L. Bartlett, “The sample complexity of pattern classification with
neural networks: the size of the weights is more important than the size of
the network,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 44(2), pp. 525–536, 1998.
G. Huang, S. Song, J. N. Gupta and C. Wu, “Semi-supervised and
unsupervised extreme learning machines.,” IEEE Trans Cybern, 2014, in
press.
H.-J. Rong, G.-B. Huang, N. Sundararajan and P. Saratchandran, “Online
sequential fuzzy extreme learning machine for function approximation
and classification problems,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and
Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, vol. 39(4), pp. 1067-1072, 2009.
Z.-L. Sun, K.-F. Au and T.-M. Choi, “A neuro-fuzzy inference system
through integration of fuzzy logic and extreme learning machines,” IEEE
Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, vol.
37(5), pp. 1321-1331, 2007.
W. Zhu, J. Miao, J. Hu and L. Qing, “Vehicle detection in driving
simulation using extreme learning machine,” Neurocomputing, vol. 128,
pp. 160-165, 2013.
Z. Bai, G.-B. Huang, D. Wang, H. Wang and M. B. Westover, "Sparse
Extreme Learning Machine for Classification," IEEE Transactions on
Cybernetics, 2014, in press.
Q.-Y. Zhu, A.K. Qin, P.N. Suganthan and G.-B. Huang, “Evolutionary
extreme learning machine,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 38(10), pp. 1759–
1763, Oct. 2005.
L. Yuan, Y. C. Soh, and G.-B. Huang, "A constructive enhancement for
online sequential extreme learning machine," in Proceedings of
International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN2009), pp.
1708–1713, 14-19 Jun., 2009.
Y. Miche, A. Sorjamaa, P. Bas, O. Simula, C. Jutten and A. Lendasse, A.,
“OP-ELM: optimally pruned extreme learning machine,” Neural
Networks, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 21(1), pp. 158-162, 2010.
H. J. Rong, Y. S. Ong, A. H. Tan and Z. Zhu, “A fast pruned-extreme
learning machine for classification problem,” Neurocomputing, vol.
72(1), pp. 359-366, 2008.
D. Yu and L. Deng, “Efficient and effective algorithms for training
single-hidden-layer neural networks,” Pattern Recognition Letters, vol.
33(5), pp. 554–558, 1 Apr. 2012.
K. P. Murphy, “Machine learning: a probabilistic perspective,” The MIT
Press, 2012.
Y. Su, S. Shan, X. Chen and W. Gao, “Classifiability-based
discriminatory projection pursuit,” IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, vol.
22(12), pp. 2050-2061, 2011.
O. Vinyals, Y. Jia, L. Deng and T. Darrell, “Learning with recursive
perceptual representations,” In Advances in Neural Information
Processing Systems, pp. 2834-2842, 2012.
L. Deng and D. Yu, “Deep convex net: A scalable architecture for speech
pattern classification,” In Proceedings of the Interspeech 2011.
A. Krizhevsky and G. Hinton, “Learning multiple layers of features from
tiny images,” Master's thesis, Department of Computer Science,
University of Toronto, 2009, [http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~kriz/
cifar.html].
N.-Y. Liang, G.-B. Huang, P. Saratchandran and N. Sundararajan, “A fast
and accurate online sequential learning algorithm for feedforward
networks,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 17(6), pp.
1411-1423, 2006.
G.-B. Huang, X. Ding and H. Zhou, “Optimization method based extreme
learning machine for classification,” Neurocomputing, vol. 74(1), pp.
155-163, 2010.
W. Zhu, J. Miao and L. Qing, “Robust regression with extreme support
vectors,” pattern recognition letters, vol. 45, pp. 205-210, 2014.
Q. Liu, Q. He and Z. Shi, “Extreme support vector machine classifier,” In
Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Springer Berlin
Heidelberg, pp. 222-233, 2008.
W. Zhu, J. Miao and L. Qing, “Constrained Extreme Learning Machine: a
Novel Highly Discriminative Random Feedforward Neural Network,” in
Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Neural Networks
(IJCNN2014), pp. 800-807, 2014.
C. M. Bishop and N. M. Nasrabadi, “Pattern recognition and machine
learning”, New York: springer, 2006.
C. L. Blake and C. J. Merz, “UCI Repository of machine learning
databases”, 1998, [http://www.ics.uci.edu/~mlearn/MLRepository. html].
Irvine, CA: University of California. Department of Information and
Computer Science, 460.
14
[40] L. L. C. Kasun, H. Zhou, G.-B. Huang and C. M. Vong, “Representational
Learning with Extreme Learning Machine for Big Data,” IEEE Intelligent
Systems, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 31-34, December 2013.
[41] M. Riedmiller and H. Braun, “A direct adaptive method for faster
backpropagation learning: The RPROP algorithm,” In IEEE International
Conference on Neural Networks, pp. 586-591, 1993.
[42] Y. LeCun, L. Bottou, Y. Bengio and P. Haffner, “Gradient-based learning
applied to document recognition,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 86(11),
pp.
2278-2324,
1998,
[Online].
Available:
http://yann.lecun.com/exdb/mnist.
[43] A. Coates and A. Ng, “The importance of encoding versus training with
sparse coding and vector quantization,” In Proceedings of the 28th
International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-11) (pp. 921-928),
2011.
[44] T. Blumensath and M. E. Davies, “On the difference between orthogonal
matching pursuit and orthogonal least squares,” unpublished manuscript,
2007,
[http://www.see.ed.ac.uk/~tblumens/papers/BD
OMPvsOLS07.pdf].
[45] G. E. Hinton, S. Osindero and Y. W. Teh, “A fast learning algorithm for
deep belief nets,” Neural computation, vol. 18(7), pp. 1527-1554, 2006.
[46] P. Vincent, H. Larochelle, I. Lajoie, Y. Bengio and P. A. Manzagol,
“Stacked denoising autoencoders: Learning useful representations in a
deep network with a local denoising criterion,” The Journal of Machine
Learning Research, vol. 11, pp. 3371-3408, 2010.
[47] G. E. Hinton and R. R. Salakhutdinov, R. R., “Reducing the
dimensionality of data with neural networks,” Science, vol. 313(5786), pp.
504-507, 2006.
[48] R. Salakhutdinov and H. Larochelle, “Efficient learning of deep
Boltzmann machines,” In International Conference on Artificial
Intelligence and Statistics, pp. 693-700, 2010.
[49] L. Maaten, “Learning a parametric embedding by preserving local
structure,” In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and
Statistics,
pp.
384-391,
2009,
[Code: http://homepage.tudelft.nl/19j49/t-SNE.html].
[50] S. T. Roweis and L. K. Saul, “Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by
locally linear embedding,” Science, vol. 290(5500), pp. 2323-2326, 2000.
[51] W. Zhu, J. Miao and L. Qing, “Extreme support vector regression,” in
Proceedings of International Conference on Extreme Learning Machines
(ELM2013), Beijing, China, Spring-Verlag, 15-17 Oct. 2013.
[52] Y. Su, S. Shan, X. Chen and W. Gao, “Classifiability-based
discriminatory projection pursuit,” IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, vol.
22(12), pp. 2050-2061, 2011.
[53] M. D. McDonnell, M. D. Tissera and A. van Schaik, "Fast, simple and
accurate handwritten digit classification using extreme learning machines
with shaped input-weights," arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.8307, 2014.
[54] Q. Leng, H. Qi, J. Miao, W. Zhu, G. Su, "One-Class Classification with
Extreme Learning Machine," Mathematical Problems in Engineering,
2014.
| 9cs.NE
|
Artifact reduction for separable non-local means
Sanjay Ghosh and Kunal N. Chaudhury1
arXiv:1710.09552v1 [cs.CV] 26 Oct 2017
Department of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore.
Abstract. It was recently demonstrated [J. Electron. Imaging, 25(2), 2016] that one can perform fast non-local means
(NLM) denoising of one-dimensional signals using a method called lifting. The cost of lifting is independent of the
patch length, which dramatically reduces the run-time for large patches. Unfortunately, it is difficult to directly extend
lifting for non-local means denoising of images. To bypass this, the authors proposed a separable approximation in
which the image rows and columns are filtered using lifting. The overall algorithm is significantly faster than NLM, and
the results are comparable in terms of PSNR. However, the separable processing often produces vertical and horizontal
stripes in the image. This problem was previously addressed by using a bilateral filter-based post-smoothing, which
was effective in removing some of the stripes. In this letter, we demonstrate that stripes can be mitigated in the first
place simply by involving the neighboring rows (or columns) in the filtering. In other words, we use a two-dimensional
search (similar to NLM), while still using one-dimensional patches (as in the previous proposal). The novelty is in
the observation that one can use lifting for performing two-dimensional searches. The proposed approach produces
artifact-free images, whose quality and PSNR are comparable to NLM, while being significantly faster.
Keywords: Denoising, non-local means, fast algorithm, lifting, artifact.
1 Introduction
We consider the problem of denoising grayscale images corrupted with additive white Gaussian
noise. A popular denoising method is the non-local means (NLM) algorithm,1 where image patches
are used to perform pixel aggregation. While NLM is no longer the state-of-the-art, it is still
used in the image processing community due to its simplicity, decent denoising performance, and
the availability
of fast implementations. The NLM of an image f = {f (i) : i ∈ Ω}, where
Ω = i = (i1 , i2 ) : 1 ≤ i1 , i2 ≤ N }, is given by1
P
j∈S(i) wij f (j)
NLM[f ](i) = P
(i ∈ Ω).
(1)
j∈S(i) wij
where S(i) = i + [−S, S]2 is a search window around the pixel of interest. The weights wij are set
to be
1 X
2
wij = exp − 2
f (i + k) − f (j + k) ,
(2)
α k∈P
where α is a smoothing parameter and P = [−K, K]2 is a two-dimensional patch.
A direct implementation of (1) has the per-pixel complexity of O(S 2 K 2 ), where S and K are
typically in the range [7, 20] and [1, 3].1 Several computational tricks and approximations have been
proposed to speedup the direct implementation.2–8 A particular means to speed up NLM is using
a separable approximation, which in fact is a standard trick in the image processing literature.9–12
In separable filtering, the rows are processed first followed by the columns (or in the reverse
order). Of course, if the original filter is non-separable, then the output of separable filtering is
generally different from that of the original filter, since a natural image typically contains diagonal
details.12 This is the case with NLM since expression (2) is not separable. The present focus is on a
1
Email: [email protected], [email protected]
recent separable approximation of NLM.13 At the core of this proposal is a method called lifting,
which computes the NLM of a one-dimensional signal using O(S) operations per sample. In other
words, the complexity of lifting is independent of the patch length K. Extending lifting for NLM
denoising of images, however, turns out to be a difficult task. Therefore, we proposed a separable
approximation, called separable NLM (SNLM),13 in which the rows and columns of the image are
independently filtered using lifting. In particular, we separately computed the “rows-then-columns”
and “columns-then-rows” filtering, which were then optimally combined. The per-pixel complexity
of SNLM is O(S), which is a dramatic reduction compared to the O(S 2 K 2 ) complexity of NLM.
A flip side of SNLM (as is the case with other separable formulations14 ) is that often vertical
and horizontal stripes are induced in the processed image. The stripes are more prominent along the
last filtered dimension.14 In SNLM, this problem was alleviated using the optimal recombination
mentioned above followed by a bilateral filter-based post-smoothing. In this work, we demonstrate
that the stripes can be mitigated in the first place simply by involving the neighboring rows (or
columns) in the filtering. In other words, we use a two-dimensional search (similar to classical
NLM1 ), while still using one-dimensional patches (as done previously13 ). The present novelty is in
the observation that one can use lifting for performing a two-dimensional search. In particular, the
per-pixel complexity of the proposed approach is O(S 2 ), which is higher than our previous proposal,
but still substantially lower than that of classical NLM. Importantly, the proposed approach no
longer exhibits the visible artifacts that are otherwise obtained using SNLM.
The rest of the paper is organized as follows. We recall the SNLM algorithm in Section 2 and
its fast implementation using lifting. We also illustrate the artifact problem with an example. The
proposed solution is presented in Section 3, along with some algorithmic details. In Section 4, we
report the denoising performance of our approach and compare it with classical NLM and SNLM.
We end the paper with some concluding remarks in Section 5.
2 Separable Non-Local Means
To set up the context, we briefly recall the SNLM algorithm.13 Suppose we have a one-dimensional
signal g = {g(i) : 1 ≤ i ≤ N }, corresponding to a row or column. The one-dimensional analogue
of (1) is given by
P
j∈S(i) wij g(j)
NLM1D[g](i) = P
(1 ≤ i ≤ N ),
(3)
j∈S(i) wij
and
K
2
1 X
g(i + k) − g(j + k) ,
wij = exp − 2
β k=−K
(4)
where S(i) = i + [−S, S] and β is a smoothing parameter. In other words, both the search window
and patch are one-dimensional in this case. It was observed in our previous work that the weights
{wij : 1 ≤ i ≤ N, i − S ≤ j ≤ i + S} can be computed using O(1) operations with respect to K.
In particular, consider the N × N matrices:
F(i, j) = g(i)g(j)
and
F(i, j) =
K
X
k=−K
(1 ≤ i, j ≤ N ),
F(i + k, j + k).
(5)
(6)
3
(a) Clean.
(b) Noisy, 20.19.
(e) Proposed (RC), 26.67.
(f) Proposed (CR), 26.66.
(c) 1D search and 1D patch. (d) 2D search and 1D patch.
(g) SNLM,13 26.57.
(h) NLM,1 26.02.
Fig 1 Denoising of Peppers at noise standard deviation σ = 25. We see stripes in (c) in which both the patch and
search window are one-dimensional (both are along rows). As seen in (d), the stripes can however be reduced using
a two-dimensional search in place of the one-dimensional counterpart (though we still see some noise). The image
obtained by further processing (d) using a two-dimensional search and one-dimensional patches (along columns) is
shown in (e). The visual quality and PSNR (mentioned below each image) of (e) is comparable to NLM. In (f), we have
reversed the order of processing: we first use one-dimensional patches along columns and then along rows (the search
is two-dimensional). Notice that the order (RC/CR) has no visible impact on the final output. Also notice that residual
stripes can be seen in SNLM.
We see
see that
that F
F is
is the
the smoothed
smoothed version
version of
of F,
F, obtained
obtained by
We
by box
box filtering
filtering F
F along
along its
its sub-diagonals.
sub-diagonals.
13
13
The
important
observation
is
that
we
can
write
The important observation is that we can write
K
X
K
2
X
g(i + k) g(j + k)2 = F(i, i) + F(j, j) 2F(i, j).
g(i + k) − g(j + k) = F(i, i) + F(j, j) − 2F(i, j).
k= K
k=−K
(7)
(7)
In particular, using this so-called lifting, we can compute the patch distance using just three
In
particular,
this so-called and
lifting,
can compute
the patch distance
using just
samples
of F,using
one multiplication,
twowe
additions.
The computational
gain comes
fromthree
the
samples
of
F,
one
multiplication,
and
two
additions.
The
computational
gain
comes
the
fact that the box filtering in (6) can be computed using O(1) operations with respect to from
K using
fact
that the13box
filtering following
in (6) can the
be computed
using
operations
with
using
recursions.
Moreover,
observation
that O(1)
not all
samples of
F respect
are usedtoinK(3),
an
13
recursions.
Moreover,
following
the
observation
that
not
all
samples
of
F
are
used
in
(3),
an
13
efficient mechanism for computing (and storing) just the required samples was proposed. 13 The
efficient
forcomputing
computing
storing)
just the to
required
samples
was proposed.
The
per-pixelmechanism
complexity of
(3)(and
using
lifting reduces
O(S) from
the brute-force
complexity
per-pixel
complexity
of computing
(3) using
lifting
reduces
to O(S) from thepatches
brute-force
of O(SK).
Unfortunately,
extending
lifting
to handle
two-dimensional
turnscomplexity
out to be
of
O(SK).
Unfortunately,
extending
lifting
to
handle
two-dimensional
patches
turns
out using
to be
difficult. Instead, we proposed to use separable filtering, where the rows (columns) are
filtered
difficult.
Instead,
we columns
proposed(row).
to use The
separable
filtering,outputs
where are
the rows
(columns) combined
are filteredto
using
(3) followed
by the
two distinct
then optimally
get
(3)
followed
by
the
columns
(row).
The
two
distinct
outputs
are
then
optimally
combined
to
the final image. In fact, the reason behind the averaging was to suppress artifacts in the formget
of
the final image. In fact, the reason behind the averaging was to suppress artifacts in the form of
stripes arising from the separable filtering. This is demonstrated with an example in Fig. 1, where
we have compared NLM, SNLM, and the proposed approach. We used bilateral filtering to remove
the stripes in SNLM, at an additional cost. However, the final image still has some residual artifacts.
3 Proposed Approach
We see less stripes in Fig. 1(d) precisely because we use a two-dimensional search. In other words,
we use a cross between classical NLM and SNLM in which we use (8) for the aggregation and (4)
for the weights. The two-dimensional search results in the averaging of pixels from across rows
(and columns). This does not happen in SNLM, which causes the stripes to appear in Fig. 1(c).
v
u
j = (j1, j2)
q = (i1, q2 )
i = (i1, i2)
Rows
(2 K + 1)
(2 S + 1)
(2 S + 1)
Fig 2 Illustration of the idea behind the proposed method (see text for details).
The working of our proposal is explained in Fig 2. The pixel of interest in this case is the pixel
at position i = (i1 , i2 ) marked with a red dot. The search window of length 2S + 1 is marked with a
green bounding box. Two neighboring pixels at locations j = (j1 , j2 ) and q = (i1 , q2 ) are marked
with red dots. The former pixel is on a neighboring row, while the latter is on the same row as the
pixel of interest. Similar to SNLM,13 we can consider either horizontal or vertical patches. For our
example, the patches (of length 2K + 1) are aligned with the image rows; they are marked with
light blue rectangles. For our proposal, the denoising at i = (i1 , i2 ) is performed using the formula:
P
`∈S(i) wi` f (`)
P
,
(8)
`∈S(i) wi`
and
K
1 X
2
wi` = exp − 2
f (`1 , `2 + k) − f (i1 , i2 + k) ,
β k=−K
(9)
where S(i) = i + [−S, S]2 and ` = (`1 , `2 ). To compute (8), we group the neighboring patches
into two categories: (i) patches with row index i1 , e.g., patch q in Fig. 2, and (ii) patches with a
different row index, e.g., patch j in the figure. Let {u(t) : 1 ≤ t ≤ N } and {v(t) : 1 ≤ t ≤ N } be
the i1 -th and j1 -th row, where N is the length of a row (see Fig 2). Similar to (5) and (6), we define
the N × N matrices:
Fuu (p, q) = u(p)u(q),
Fvv (p, q) = v(p)v(q),
and Fuv (p, q) = u(p)v(q),
(10)
and the corresponding matrices Fuu , Fvv , and Fuv , where, for example,
Fuu (p, q) =
K
X
k=−K
u(p + k)u(q + k)
(1 ≤ p, q ≤ N ).
(11)
As in (7), the (squared) distance between patches centered at i = (i1 , i2 ) and q = (i1 , q2 ) is
Fuu (i2 , i2 ) + Fuu (q2 , q2 ) − 2Fuu (i2 , q2 ).
(12)
On the other hand, the distance between patches centered at i = (i1 , i2 ) and j = (j1 , j2 ) is
Fuu (i2 , i2 ) + Fvv (j2 , j2 ) − 2Fuv (i2 , j2 ).
(13)
In other words, we can compute the distance between patches centered at i and q using Fuu . To
compute the distance between patches centered at i and j, we require the matrices Fuu , Fvv , and Fuv .
Moreover, using these matrices, we can compute patch distances for different i, j, and q, provided
the row index of i and q is i1 , and the row index of j is j1 . Thus, an efficient way of computing (8)
is to sequentially process the rows. For each row (fixed u), we compute Fuu , Fvv , and Fuv , where v
corresponds to neighboring rows that are separated by at most S. We compute 2S + 1 matrices of
the form Fvv and another 2S matrices of the form Fuv . As mentioned in Section 2, we can compute
each matrix using O(1) operations with respect to K. Moreover, as per the sum in (3), we only
require entries within the diagonal band {1 ≤ i, j ≤ N : |i − j| ≤ S} of each matrix. The cost
of computing the banded entries is thus O(N S) for each matrix. The overall cost of processing N
rows is O(N 2 S 2 ). The per-pixel complexity of computing (8) using the proposed approach is thus
O(S 2 ). We can efficiently compute (and store) the banded entries using the method in Section 2.2
of the original paper.13 The main difference with SNLM is that we require a total of 4S + 1 matrices
for processing each row; whereas, just one matrix is required in SNLM. As shown in Fig. 1(d),
some residual noise can still be seen after the processing mentioned above. We perform a similar
processing once more, except this time we use one-dimensional patches along columns. The visual
quality and PSNR of the final image (Fig. 1(e)) are comparable to NLM (Fig. 1(h)). Moreover, we
see from Figs. 1(e) and 1(f) that if we first use one-dimensional patches along columns and then
along rows, then the outputs are similar. We empirically corroborate these observations in the next
section. Therefore, we propose to first process the rows using (8) and then process the columns of
the intermediate image using (8). A precise description of the proposed approach for processing
the (noisy) image along rows using lifting is provided in Algorithm 1. We then perform column
processing on the intermediate image to obtain the final output of our algorithm. That is, we simply
apply Algorithm 1 on the intermediate image, where we logically switch the rows and columns in
the algorithm. Suppose S1 and S2 are the corresponding search windows for the row-aligned and
column-aligned processing. Then we set the search parameter in Algorithm 1 as: S = S1 for the
row-aligned processing, and S = S2 for the column-aligned processing.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
Data: Image f of size M × N , and parameters K, S, β.
Result: Row-processed image f˜ of size M × N given by (8).
for i1 = 1, . . . , M do
% lifting
for i2 = 1, . . . , N do
u(i2 ) = f (i1 , i2 );
end
Compute matrices Fuu and Fuu using (10) and (11);
for j1 ∈ { i1 − S, . . . , i1 + S}\{i1 } do
for j2 = 1, . . . , N do
v(i2 ) = f (j1 , j2 );
end
Compute matrices Fvv , Fuv , Fvv and Fuv using (10) and (11);
end
% weight computation and pixel aggregation
for i2 = 1, . . . , N do
Set P = 0 and Q = 0;
for j1 = i1 do
for k2 ∈ {i2 − S, . . . , i2 + S} do
Compute weight wi2 k2 using (12) and (9);
P = P + wi2 k2 f (j1 , k2 ) ;
Q = Q + wi2 k2 ;
end
end
for j1 ∈ { i1 − S, . . . , i1 + S}\{i1 } do
for j2 ∈ {i2 − S, . . . , i2 + S} do
Compute weight wi2 j2 using (13) and (9);
P = P + wi2 j2 f (j1 , j2 ) ;
Q = Q + wi2 j2 ;
end
end
f˜(i1 , i2 ) = P/Q.
end
end
Algorithm 1: Proposed processing along rows using lifting.
4 Experiments
The denoising performance of the proposed method is compared with NLM and SNLM in Table 1.
We have used standard grayscale images from15, 16 for our experiments. The Matlab implementation
used to generate the results in this section is publicly available2 . The search windows for the
three methods were set as follows. Suppose S be the search window for NLM (which we take as
2
http://in.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/64856
σ
Method
5
10
20
30
50
5
10
House (256 × 256)
20
30
50
Montage (256 × 256)
Noisy
34.1/83 28.1/60 22.1/34 18.6/22 14.2/12 34.2/83 28.1/61 22.1/36 18.6/25 14.1/15
NLM1
36.9/90 34.1/87 29.7/82 26.8/77 24.0/69 39.1/97 34.3/94 29.6/89 26.5/85 22.2/76
Darbon et al.4 36.1/90 31.4/75 26.1/51 22.8/36 18.6/21 38.4/89 30.9/76 25.8/52 22.6/38 18.6/24
SNLM13
36.6/89 33.6/86 29.4/81 26.5/76 23.7/69 39.3/97 34.6/94 29.7/89 26.7/84 22.5/77
Proposed
36.6/89 34.1/86 30.4/82 27.3/77 24.1/70 39.4/97 34.8/94 30.2/90 27.3/86 23.4/79
BM3D19
38.6/95 34.7/93 31.3/88 29.3/85 26.6/78 41.1/98 37.3/96 33.5/94 31.2/91 27.4/85
Method
Boat (512 × 512)
Man (1024 × 1024)
Noisy
34.1/97 28.1/90 22.1/73 18.6/59 14.2/41 34.1/99 28.1/97 22.1/91 18.6/85 14.1/70
NLM1
35.1/96 30.8/89 26.7/78 24.7/70 23.0/62 35.3/98 31.1/95 27.5/88 25.8/83 24.2/76
Darbon et al.4 34.4/97 30.3/94 25.4/82 22.4/71 18.4/53 35.1/97 30.4/98 25.6/95 22.5/90 18.5/80
SNLM13
35.0/96 30.7/89 26.6/77 24.5/69 22.7/61 35.3/98 31.0/95 27.2/87 25.4/83 23.8/75
Proposed
34.9/96 30.7/89 26.8/77 24.7/70 22.9/62 35.1/98 31.1/95 27.5/88 25.8/ 84 24.2/78
BM3D19
37.3/98 33.9/96 30.8/92 29.0/88 26.7/81 37.3/99 34.1/98 31.2/96 29.5/94 27.4/89
Table 1 Comparison of the denoising performances on various images15 in terms of PSNR/SSIM at various noise
standard deviations σ. The PSNRs are rounded to one decimal place, while the SSIMs (in %) are rounded to integer.
S
7
Method
NLM1
10
12
7
K=2
44
87
10
12
K=3
124
45
88
126
Darbon et al.4 0.33 0.60 0.84 0.33 0.62 0.85
SNLM13
0.31 0.39 0.45 0.32 0.40 0.46
Proposed
1.20 2.30 3.20 1.30 2.40 3.30
Table 2 Comparison of the run-time (in seconds) of the proposed approach with classical NLM for a 256 × 256 image.
The computations were performed using Matlab on a 3.40 GHz Intel quad-core machine with 32 GB memory.
reference). Following the original proposal,13 the window for SNLM is also set as S. For a fair
comparison with NLM, we ensure that equal number of pixel are averaged in both methods. This
is achieved if (2S1 + 1)2 + (2S2 + 1)2 = (2S + 1)2 . Moreover, following,14 we set S2 = S1 /2.
These equations uniquely determine S1 and S2 (up to an integer rounding). Moreover, we normalize
8
(a) Clean (512 ⇥ 512).
(b) Noisy, 18.6/60.
(c) NLM,1 25.3/71.
(d) SNLM, 25.3/71.
(e) SNLM13 (smoothed), 24.9/69.
(f) Proposed, 25.4/70.
Fig
smoothing (d)
(d) using
using aa bilateral-filter.
bilateral-filter.
Fig33Denoising
Denoisingof
ofMan
Man1515 at
atσ =
= 30.
30. Notice
Notice that
that stripes
stripes can be seen in (e) after smoothing
The
our proposal
proposal (f)
(f) isis visually
visually
ThePSNR/SSIM
PSNR/SSIMvalues
valueswith
withreference
reference to
to the
the clean
clean image
image are also provided. The result from our
similar
335, 1.7,
1.7, and
and 9.8
9.8 seconds.
seconds.
similartotoclassical
classicalNLM
NLM(c).
(c). The
The runtime
runtime for
for NLM,
NLM, SNLM, and the proposed method are 335,
We
proposed approximation
approximation(f)
(f)
Weused
usedthe
theparameter
parametersettings
settings mentioned
mentioned in
in the
the main
main text. The PSNR/SSIM between the proposed
andthe
theclassical
classicalNLM
NLM(c)
(c)are
are40.58/70.22,
40.58/70.22, whereas
whereas the
the values are 37.96/69.90 for SNLM (d).
and
(d).
proposed
approach
gives comparable
results
inthe
terms
of PSNR
comparison
the
smoothing
parameters
in (2) and (9)
using
relation
β 2 =and
α2SSIM.
/(2K 17
+A
1).visual
For the
results in
of the1,denoising
is provided
and4,4.and
Weαcan
clearly
seenotice
somefrom
stripes
in the
images
Table
we set Kresults
= 3, S
= 10, S1 in
= Fig.
9, S23 =
= 10σ.
We
Table
1 that
the
17
obtained approach
using SNLM,
with andresults
without
the boxed
In contrast,
proposed
givesboth
comparable
inpost-processing
terms of PSNR (see
and SSIM.
A areas).
visual comparison
there
is
hardly
any
artifacts
present
in
the
denoised
image
obtained
using
our
method.
A images
timing
of the denoising results is provided in Fig. 3 and 4. We can clearly see some stripes in the
comparison
is provided
in Table
While
the proposed
method(see
is slower
than areas).
SNLM In
(this
is the
obtained
using
SNLM, both
with2.and
without
post-processing
the boxed
contrast,
price
we
pay
for
removing
the
stripes),
it
is
nevertheless
significantly
faster
than
NLM.
there is hardly any artifacts present in the denoised image obtained using our method. A timing
4
We noteisthat
thoughin
Darbon
is generally
fastermethod
than our
proposal,
its (this
denoising
comparison
provided
Table et
2. al.
While
the proposed
is current
slower than
SNLM
is the
performance
starts
deteriorating
with
the
increase
in
noise
variance.
This
is
evident
from
Table
price we pay for removing the stripes), it is nevertheless significantly faster than NLM.
18
1 and
Wethough
also note
that NLM
SNLM fall
short
of our
KSVD
and
BM3D19itsindenoising
terms of
WeFig.
note4.that
Darbon
et al.4 and
is generally
faster
than
current
proposal,
denoising performance.
Nevertheless,
NLM
continues
to be variance.
of interest This
due toisits
decentfrom
denoising
performance
starts deteriorating
with the
increase
in noise
evident
Table
20–23
18
19
capability,
and
importantly,
the
availability
of
fast
approximations.
As
reported
by
other
1 and Fig. 4. We also note that NLM and SNLM fall short of KSVD and BM3D in terms of
authors,24performance.
NLM is quite Nevertheless,
effective in preserving
fine details,
successfully
removing
noise.
denoising
NLM continues
to bewhile
of interest
due to its
decent denoising
20–23
capability,
and importantly, the availability of fast approximations. As reported by other
24
authors, NLM is quite effective in preserving fine details, while successfully removing noise.
9
(a) Clean (512 ⇥ 512).
(b) Noisy, 28.1/83.
(c) NLM,1 34.7/94.
(d) SNLM,13 34.6/94.
(e) BM3D,19 37.2/97.
(f) KSVD,18 36.9/97.
(g) Darbon et al.,4 30.9/91.
(h) Proposed, 34.6/94.
kodim2316
Fig
classical
Fig 44 Denoising
Denoising of kodim23 at σ = 10. The result obtained through our proposal (h) is visually similar to classical
NLM
PSNR/SSIM
NLM (c).
(c). The runtime for NLM, SNLM, and the proposed method are 335, 1.7, and 9.8 seconds. The PSNR/SSIM
between
42.4/99.4
between the proposed approximation (h) and the classical NLM (c) are 43.33/99.7, whereas these values are 42.4/99.4
for
some
for (d)
(d) and
and 30.85/89.3 for (g). We have zoomed the region around the beak in (c), (d), (g), and (h). We can see some
artifacts in (d) and residual noise in (g); the zooms in (c) and (h) are visually indistinguishable.
artifacts
5 Conclusion
We proposed a method that uses the idea of lifting from previous work13 to perform fast non-local
means denoising of images. The proposed method does not give rise to undesirable artifacts (as was
the case with the original proposal), and produces images whose denoising quality and PSNR/SSIM
are comparable to non-local means. While this comes at the expense of added computation, the
proposed method nevertheless is much faster than non-local means. In fact, the speedup is about
40x for practical parameter settings.
6 Acknowledgements
The last author was supported by a Startup Grant from IISc and EMR Grant SB/S3/EECE/281/2016
from DST, Government of India.
References
1 A. Buades, B. Coll, and J.-M. Morel, “A non-local algorithm for image denoising,” Proc. IEEE
Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2, pp. 60-65 (2005).
2 M. Mahmoudi and G. Sapiro, “Fast image and video denoising via nonlocal means of similar
neighborhoods,” IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 12(12), pp. 839-842 (2005).
3 J. Wang, Y. Guo, Y. Ying, Y. Liu, and Q. Peng, “Fast non-local algorithm for image denoising,”
Proc. IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, pp. 1429-1432 (2006).
4 J. Darbon, A. Cunha, T. F. Chan, S. Osher, and G. J. Jensen, “Fast nonlocal filtering applied to
electron cryomicroscopy,” Proc. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, pp.
1331-1334 (2008).
5 A. Dauwe, B. Goossens, H. Luong, and W. Philips, “A fast non-local image denoising algorithm,”
Proc. SPIE Electronic Imaging, 68(12), pp. 1331-1334 (2008).
6 J. Orchard, M. Ebrahimi, and A. Wong, “Efficient nonlocal-means denoising using the SVD,”
Proc. IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, pp. 1732-1735 (2008).
7 V. Karnati, M. Uliyar, and S. Dey, “Fast non-local algorithm for image denoising,” Proc. IEEE
International Conference on Image Processing, pp. 3873-3876 (2009).
8 L. Condat, “A simple trick to speed up and improve the non-local means,” Research Report,
HAL-00512801, (2010).
9 P. M. Narendra, “A separable median filter for image noise smoothing,” IEEE Transactions on
Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 3, pp. 20-29 (1981).
10 N. Fukushima, S. Fujita, and Y. Ishibashi, “Switching dual kernels for separable edge-preserving
filtering,” IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, (2015).
11 T. Q. Pham and L. J. Van Vliet, “Separable bilateral filtering for fast video preprocessing,” Proc.
IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, (2005).
12 Y. S. Kim, H. Lim, O. Choi, K. Lee, J. D. K. Kim, and C. Kim, “Separable bilateral non-local
means,” Proc. IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, pp. 1513-1516 (2011).
13 S. Ghosh and K. N. Chaudhury, “Fast separable nonlocal means,” SPIE Journal of Electronic
Imaging, 25(2), 023026 (2016).
14 E. S. Gastal and M. M. Oliveira. “Domain transform for edge-aware image and video processing,”
ACM Transactions on Graphics (ToG), 30(4), 69 (2011).
15 BM3D Image Database, http://www.cs.tut.fi/˜foi/GCF-BM3D.
16 KODAK Image Database, http://r0k.us/graphics/kodak/.
17 Z. Wang, A. C. Bovik, H. R. Sheikh, and E. P. Simoncelli, “Image quality assessment: From
error visibility to structural similarity,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 13(4), pp.
600-612 (2004).
18 M. Elad and M. Aharon, “Image denoising via sparse and redundant representations over
learned dictionaries,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 15(12), pp. 3736-3745 (2006).
19 K. Dabov, A. Foi, V. Katkovnik, and K. Egiazarian, “Image denoising by sparse 3-D transformdomain collaborative filtering,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 16(8), pp. 2080-2095
(2007).
20 J. M. Batikian and M. Liebling, “Multicycle non-local means denoising of cardiac image
sequences,” IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, pp. 1071-1074 (2014).
21 C. Chan, R. Fulton, R. Barnett, D.D. Feng, and S. Meikle, “Post-reconstruction nonlocal means
filtering of whole-body PET with an anatomical prior,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging,
33(3), pp. 636-650 (2014).
22 G. Chen, P. Zhang, Y. Wu, D. Shen, and P.T. Yap, “Collaborative non-local means denoising
of magnetic resonance images,” IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, pp.
564-567 (2015).
23 D. Zeng, J. Huang, H. Zhang, Z. Bian, S. Niu, Z. Zhang, Q. Feng, W. Chen, and J. Ma, “Spectral
CT image restoration via an average image-induced nonlocal means filter,” IEEE Transactions
on Biomedical Engineering, 63(5), pp. 1044-1057 (2016).
24 G. Treece, “The bitonic filter: linear filtering in an edge-preserving morphological framework,”
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 25(11), pp. 5199-5211 (2016).
| 1cs.CV
|
arXiv:1803.10801v1 [math.GT] 28 Mar 2018
LENGTH FUNCTIONS ON CURRENTS AND APPLICATIONS TO
DYNAMICS AND COUNTING
VIVEKA ERLANDSSON AND CAGLAR UYANIK
Contents
1. Introduction
2. Background
2.1. Curves on surfaces
2.2. Teichmüller space and the mapping class group
2.3. Measured Laminations
2.4. Geodesic Currents
2.5. Nielsen–Thurston classification
2.6. Length functions and the intersection number
3. Length functions on space of currents
3.1. Length of currents through Liouville currents
3.2. Stable length of currents
3.3. Stable length as a generalization of intersection length
4. Applications to counting curves
4.1. Thurston measure
4.2. Counting with respect to length functions
4.3. Orbits of currents
5. Dynamics of pseudo-Anosov homeomorphisms
References
1
3
3
3
4
6
7
7
11
12
16
18
19
21
22
28
29
34
1. Introduction
Geodesic currents are measure theoretic generalizations of closed curves
on hyperbolic surfaces and they play an important role, among many other
things, in the study of the geometry of Teichmüller space (see, for example,
[Bon86, Bon88]). The set of all closed curves sits naturally as a subset of
the space of currents, and various fundamental notions such as geometric
intersection number and length of curves extend to this more general setting
of currents.
The aim of this (mostly expository) article is twofold. We first explore a
variety of length functions on the space of currents, and we survey recent
1
2
V. ERLANDSSON AND C. UYANIK
work regarding applications of length functions to counting problems. Secondly, we use length functions to provide a proof of a folklore theorem which
states that pseudo-Anosov homeomorphisms of closed hyperbolic surfaces
act on the space of projective geodesic currents with uniform north-south
dynamics, see Theorem 5.1.
More precisely, let S be a closed, orientable, finite type surface of genus
g ≥ 2 and denote the space of geodesic currents on S by Curr(S). By a length
function on Curr(S) we mean a function that is homogeneous and positive
(see Definition 2.2). There are many ways to define a length of a closed
curve on S: a Riemannian metric on S naturally induces a notion of length, a
generating set of π1 (S) gives the notion of word length of a curve, and given
a fixed (filling) curve γ one can consider a combinatorial length given by
the curves intersection number with γ. We will see that all these notions of
length give rise to continuous length functions on Curr(S).
As a first example, in section 2.6, we will see that Bonahon’s intersection
form, which is an extension of the geometric intersection number of curves
to currents, induces a continuous length function on Curr(S). We also use
this intersection form to prove the uniform north-south dynamics result
mentioned above (see section 5).
In section 3 we explore other notions of length of curves that have continuous extensions to length functions on Curr(S). In section 3.1 we use Liouville
currents to extend the length of curves given by any (possibly singular) nonpositively curved Riemannian metric on S to a continuous length function
on Curr(S), as well as the word length with respect to so-called simple generating sets of π1 (S) (see Theorem 3.3 and Corollary 3.5). Next, we explore
length functions with respect to any Riemannian metric on S (respectively
the word length with respect to an arbitrary generating set) and explain why
the corresponding stable lengths extend to continuous length functions on
Curr(S), see Theorem 3.6.
In section 4, we apply the results of section 3 to problems regarding
counting curves on surfaces. Mirzakhani proved that the asymptotic growth
rate of the number of curves of bounded hyperbolic length, in each mapping
class group orbit, is polynomial in the length (see Theorem 4.1 for the precise
statement). We explain how to use continuous length functions on Curr(S)
to generalize her result to other notions of length of curves, and show that the
same asymptotic behavior holds for all lengths discussed above (see Theorem
4.3 and Corollary 4.9). These results appeared in [ES16, Erl16, EPS16] and
here we attempt to give a clear outline of the logic behind these proofs.
LENGTH FUNCTIONS AND APPLICATIONS TO DYNAMICS AND COUNTING
3
Acknowledgments: We are grateful to David Constantine, Spencer Dowdall,
Ilya Kapovich, Chris Leininger, Kasra Rafi, Juan Souto and Weixu Su for
interesting conversations throughout this project. We thank Dave Futer for
asking a question that led to Corollary 5.6. The first author also thanks the
School of Mathematics at Fudan University and Vanderbilt University for
their hospitality, and gratefully acknowledges support from the NSF grant
DMS-1500180 (A. Olshanskii and M. Sapir).
2. Background
2.1. Curves on surfaces. Throughout this article, we let S be a closed, orientable, finite type surface of genus g ≥ 2. By a curve γ on S we mean a
(free) homotopy class of an immersed, essential, closed curve. That is, the
homotopy class of the image of an immersion of the unit circle S 1 → S,
where the image is not homotopic to a point. We say the curve is simple
if the immersion is homotopic to an embedding. We identify a curve with
its corresponding conjugacy class, denoted [γ], in the fundamental group
π1 (S). Furthermore, we assume curves to be primitive, that is γ , η k for
any k > 1 and η ∈ π1 (S). By a multicurve we mean a union of finitely many
weighted curves, that is
n
Ä
a i γi
i1
where a i > 0 and γi is a curve for each i. We say the multicurve is integral if
a i ∈ Z for all i, and that it is simple if the curves γi are simple and pairwise
disjoint.
2.2. Teichmüller space and the mapping class group. A hyperbolic structure
on a surface S is a collection of charts {(U i , ψ i )} such that
(1) {U i } is an open cover of S,
(2) the map ψ i : U i → H2 is an orientation preserving homeomorphism
onto its image for each i,
(3) For each i, j such that U i ∩ U j , ∅ the restriction of ψ j ◦ ψ−1
to each
i
+
2
component of U i ∩ U j is an element of Isom (H ).
The surface S together with a hyperbolic structure is called a hyperbolic
surface. Cartan–Hadamard theorem asserts that a closed hyperbolic surface
is isometrically diffeomorphic to H2 /Γ where Γ is a torsion free discrete
subgroup of Isom+ (H2 ).
A marked hyperbolic surface is a pair (X, f ) where
(1) X H2 /Γ is a hyperbolic surface, and
(2) f : S → X is an orientation-preserving homeomorphism.
4
V. ERLANDSSON AND C. UYANIK
Given a marked hyperbolic surface (X, f ), we can pull back the hyperbolic
structure on X by f to one on S. Conversely, given a hyperbolic structure
on S, the identity map id : S → S makes (S, id) into a marked hyperbolic
surface.
The Teichmüller space of S is the set Teich(S) {(X, f )}/∼ of equivalence
classes of marked hyperbolic surfaces, where two hyperbolic surfaces (X, f )
and (Y, g) are equivalent if g ◦ f −1 is homotopic to an isometry from X to Y.
The mapping class group Mod(S) of S is the group of isotopy classes of
orientation-preserving homeomorphisms of S; in other words,
Mod(S) Homeo+ (S)/Homeo0 (S)
where Homeo0 (S) is the connected component of the identity in the orientation preserving homeomorphism group Homeo+ (S).
The mapping class group Mod(S) acts on Teich(S) naturally by precomposing the marking map, i.e. for ϕ ∈ Mod(S), and [(X, f )] ∈ Teich(S) choose
a lift Φ ∈ Homeo+ (S) of ϕ and define
ϕ[(X, f )] [(X, f ◦ Φ)].
2.3. Measured Laminations. A geodesic lamination on S is a closed subset
L of S that is a union of simple, pairwise disjoint, complete geodesics on
S. The geodesics in L are called the leaves of the lamination. A transverse
measure λ on L is an assignment of a locally finite Borel (Radon) measure
λ |k on each arc k transverse to L so that
(1) If k 0 is a subarc of an arc k, then λ |k0 is the restriction to k 0 of λ |k ;
(2) Transverse arcs which are transversely isotopic have the same measure.
A measured lamination is a pair (L, λ) where L is a geodesic lamination and
λ is a transverse measure. In what follows, we will suppress L and write
λ for brevity. The set of measured laminations on S is denoted by ML(S),
and endowed with the weak-* topology: a sequence λ n ∈ ML(S) converges
to λ ∈ ML(S) if and only if
∫
∫
f dλ n −→
k
f dλ
k
for any compactly supported continuous function f defined on a generic
transverse arc k on S.
An easy example of a measured geodesic lamination is given by a simple
curve γ on S, together with the transverse measure λ γ : for each transverse
arc k the transverse measure is the Dirac measure λ γ|k which counts the
number of intersections with γ, i.e. for any Borel subset B of k, we have
λ γ|k (B) |B ∩ γ|. The set of measured geodesic laminations coming from
LENGTH FUNCTIONS AND APPLICATIONS TO DYNAMICS AND COUNTING
5
weighted simple curves λ γ is dense in ML(S), see [PH92]. We denote the subset
of ML(S) coming from simple integral multicurves by MLZ (S).
The space of projective measured laminations is defined as the quotient
P ML(S) ML(S)/R+
and the equivalence class of a measured geodesic lamination in P ML(S) is
denoted by [λ]. We endow P ML(S) with the quotient topology.
The space ML(S) of measured laminations is homeomorphic to R6g−6 and
has a Mod(S)-invariant piecewise linear manifold structure (see, for example,
[PH92]). This piecewise linear structure is given by train track coordinates.
We refer the reader to [Thu80] and [PH92] for a detailed discussion of train
tracks and only recall the relevant notions for our purposes.
Let τ be a smoothly embedded 1-complex in S, i.e. an embedded complex
whose edges are smootly embedded arcs with well-defined tangent lines at
the end-points. A complementary region of τ is the metric completion of a
connected component of S \ τ. We say τ is a train-track on S if in addition it
satisfies the following properties:
(1) at each vertex, called switches, the tangent lines to all adjacent edges
agree
(2) at each vertex the set of adjacent edges can be divided into two sets
according to the direction of the tangent line; we require each of these
sets to be non-empty at every vertex
(3) doubling each complementary region gives a cusped surface with
negative Euler characteristic.
A train-track is called maximal if the complementary regions to τ are all
triangles.
A simple closed curve, or more generally a measured lamination (L, λ),
is carried by τ if there is a smooth map g : S → S such that
(1) g : S → S is isotopic to the identity,
(2) the restriction of g to L is an immersion,
(3) g(L) ⊂ τ.
There is a finite collection of train tracks T {τ1 , τ2 , . . . , τn } such that for
all λ ∈ ML(S) there is a τi ∈ T which λ is carried by. The set of measured
laminations carried by a train track is full dimensional if and only if the train
track is maximal. Now, each maximal train track τ determines a cone C(τ) in
R6g−6 , given by the solutions to the so called switch equations, and we have a
homeomorphism between all laminations carried by τ and C(τ). Moreover,
the integer points in C(τ) is in one to one correspondence with the integral
multicurves in MLZ (S) carried by τ.
6
V. ERLANDSSON AND C. UYANIK
2.4. Geodesic Currents. Consider a hyperbolic metric ρ on S and let S̃ be
the universal cover equipped with the pullback metric ρ̃. Let G( ρ̃) denote
1 denote the boundary at infinity of
the set of complete geodesics in S̃. Let S∞
S̃. Note that since ρ̃ is hyperbolic, S̃ is isometric to H2 and its boundary is
homeomorphic to the unit circle S 1 . Each geodesic is uniquely determined
1 . Hence we can identify the set of geodesics
by its pair of endpoints on S∞
with the double boundary
1
1
G(S̃) S∞
× S∞
\ ∆)/(x, y) ∼ (y, x)
where ∆ denotes the diagonal. That is, G(S̃) consists of unordered pair of
distinct boundary points, and we refer to it as the space of geodesics of S̃. Note
that G(S̃) is independent of the metric ρ. Indeed, if ρ0 is another geodesic
metric on S, then the universal cover S̃ equipped with the pullback metric
ρ̃0 is quasi-isometric to H2 and this quasi-isometry extends to a homeomorphism of the boundaries at infinity (see [AL] for the details). Hence G(S̃) is
well-defined without a reference to a metric.
The fundamental group π1 (S) acts naturally on S̃ by deck transformations,
1 and G(S̃). For any (geodesic)
and this action extends continuously to S∞
metric ρ the map
∂ρ : G( ρ̃) → G(S̃)
that maps each geodesic to its pair of endpoints is continuous, surjective and
π1 (S)-invariant, and a homeomorphism when ρ is negatively curved.
A geodesic current on S is a locally finite Borel measure on G(S̃) which
is invariant under the action of π1 (S). We denote the set of all geodesic
currents on S by Curr(S) and endow it with the weak-* topology: A sequence
µ n ∈ Curr(S) of currents converge to µ ∈ Curr(S) if and only if
∫
∫
f dµ n −→
f dµ
for all continuous, compactly supported functions f : G(S̃) → R.
As a first example of a geodesic current, consider the preimage under
the covering map in S̃ of any closed curve γ on S, which is a collection
of complete geodesics in S̃. This defines a discrete subset of G(S̃) which is
invariant under the action of π1 (S). The Dirac (counting) measure associated
to this set on G(S̃) gives a geodesic current on S.
The map from the set of curves on S to Curr(S) that sends each curve to
its corresponding geodesic current, as above, is injective. Hence, we view
the set of curves on S as a subset of Curr(S). In fact, Bonahon showed that
the set of all weighted curves is dense in Curr(S) [Bon86]. We identify a curve
γ with the current it defines, and by abuse of notation we denote both by γ.
LENGTH FUNCTIONS AND APPLICATIONS TO DYNAMICS AND COUNTING
7
Another important subset of geodesic currents is given by measured laminations. Let (L, λ) be a measured lamination and consider its preimage L̃
in S̃ which is a collection of pairwise disjoint complete geodesics. The lift L̃
is a discrete subset of G(S̃) which is π1 (S)-invariant. Hence the associated
Dirac measure on L defines a geodesic current on S. Moreover this measure
agrees with the transverse measure λ, see [AL] for the details. Hence we
view ML(S) as a subset of Curr(S) as well.
A current ν ∈ Curr(S) is called filling if every complete geodesic in S̃
transversely intersects a geodesic in the support of ν in G(S̃). Note that this
definition agrees with the classical notion of filling curves: a curve γ defines
a filling current if and only if γ is filling as a curve, i.e. S \ γ is a union of
topological disks.
2.5. Nielsen–Thurston classification. Thurston discovered a Mod(S)-equivariant
compactification of the Teichmüller space by the space of projective measured laminations (see section 2.3 for definitions) and using the action of
Mod(S) on Teich(S) Teich(S) ∪ P ML(S) showed:
Theorem 2.1 (Nielsen-Thurston classification). [Thu88, FLP12] Each ϕ ∈
Mod(S) is either periodic, reducible or pseudo-Anosov. Furthermore, pseudoAnosov mapping classes are neither periodic nor reducible.
Here ϕ ∈ Mod(S) is called periodic if there exist a k ≥ 0 such that ϕ k is
isotopic to the identity. The map ϕ is called reducible if there is a collection
C of disjoint simple curves on S such that ϕ(C) is isotopic to C. Finally,
ϕ ∈ Mod(S) is called pseudo-Anosov if there exists a filling pair of transverse,
measured laminations (L + , λ+ ) and (L − , λ− ), a number α > 1 called the
stretch factor, and a representative homeomorphism ϕ0 of ϕ such that
ϕ0(L + , λ+ ) (L + , αλ+ )
and
1
λ − ).
α
The measured laminations (L + , λ+ ) and (L − , λ− ) are called the stable lamination and the unstable lamination respectively. We will suppress the L and
write λ + and λ − respectively.
ϕ0(L − , λ− ) (L − ,
2.6. Length functions and the intersection number.
Definition 2.2. A length function on the space of geodesic currents is a map
` : Curr(S) → R which is homogeneous and positive, i.e.
`(aµ) a`(µ)
8
V. ERLANDSSON AND C. UYANIK
for any a > 0 and µ ∈ Curr(S), `(µ) ≥ 0 for all µ ∈ Curr(S) and `(µ) 0 iff
µ 0.
We say that a map ` on the set of curves on S is a length function if it is
a positive function, i.e. `(γ) > 0 for all curves γ on S. Note that this agrees
with the definition above, when viewing the set of curves as a subset of the
space of geodesic currents, since we assume all curves to be primitive and
essential.
Given two curves γ, η on S, their (geometric) intersection number, denoted
i(γ, η), is defined as the minimum number of transverse intersections between all transverse representatives of the homotopy classes of γ and η.
That is
i(γ, η) min |γ0 t η0 | | γ0 ∼ γ, η0 ∼ η
where ∼ denotes homotopic.
We note that i(γ, γ) 0 if and only if γ is a simple curve. Moreover,
an equivalent description of the intersection number of two distinct curves
γ and η is the following. Let ρ be a hyperbolic metric on S and S̃ be the
universal cover equipped with the pullback metric ρ̃. Let γ̃ be a geodesic
representative of a lift of γ to S̃. Let x be a point on γ̃ and consider the
bounded segment δ γ of γ̃ between x and γ(x). Consider the set of lifts of η
and take their geodesic representatives. Then the intersection number i(γ, η)
is exactly the same as the number of the lifts of η that intersect (necessarily
transversely) δ γ . This description of the intersection number will be helpful
below.
Viewing the set of curves as a subspace of the space of geodesic currents, it
is natural to ask if the intersection number extends, in a nice way, to Curr(S).
Indeed, Bonahon [Bon88] showed that there is a unique continuous extension
of the intersection number to the space of geodesic currents:
Theorem 2.3. [Bon88, Proposition 4.5] There is a unique continuous, symmetric,
bilinear form
i(·, ·) : Curr(S) × Curr(S) → R≥0
such that i(γ, η) agrees with the geometric intersection number whenever γ, η are
curves on S.
Here we give the definition of this intersection form and explain how
it induces length functions on Curr(S). For the definition we follow the
exposition presented in [AL] and refer to that paper for more details. Let
G 2 (S̃) ⊂ G(S̃) × G(S̃) be the subset defined by
G 2 (S̃)
{x, y}, {z, w} ∈ G(S̃) × G(S̃) \ ∆ |{x, y}, {c, d} link
where ∆ represents the diagonal and we say that {x, y} and {z, w} link if x
1 \ {z, w}. Equivalently, G 2 (S̃)
and y belong to different components of S∞
LENGTH FUNCTIONS AND APPLICATIONS TO DYNAMICS AND COUNTING
9
consists of pairs of geodesics in S̃ that intersect transversely. The action of
π1 (S) on S̃ induces a free and properly discontinuous action o G 2 (S̃) and
hence the quotient map
G 2 (S̃) → G 2 (S̃)/π1 (S)
is a covering map. We define
G 2 (S) G 2 (S̃)/π1 (S).
Now, let µ, ν ∈ Curr(S). Then µ × ν is a product measure on G(S̃) × G(S̃) and
hence on G 2 (S̃). This descends to a measure on G 2 (S) by locally pushing
forward µ × ν through the covering map, and the intersection of µ and ν is
defined as the µ × ν-mass on G(S). That is
i(µ, ν)
∫
dµ × dν.
G 2 (S)
Let γ be a curve and identify it with the current it defines. Let µ ∈ Curr(S).
Then i(γ, µ) can be defined as follows. As above, choose a hyperbolic metric
ρ on S and consider the universal cover S̃ equipped with the pullback metric
ρ̃. Take a lift of γ and let γ̃ be its geodesic representative. Let x be a point on
γ̃ and consider the geodesic segment η γ from x to γ(x). Let G(η γ ) denote the
set of geodesics that transversely intersect η γ and ∂ρ G(η γ ) the subset of G(S̃)
obtained by identifying each geodesic in G(η γ ) with its pair of endpoints on
1 . Then
S∞
i(γ, µ) µ ∂ρ G(η γ ) ,
see Figure 1. In particular, we see that when µ is also (the current associated to) a curve on S, then the intersection form agrees with the geometric
intersection number of curves on S.
We record some useful facts about the intersection form:
(1) If ν ∈ Curr(S) is filling, then i(ν, µ) , 0 for all µ ∈ Curr(S) \ {0}.
(2) The intersection form is invariant under Mod(S). That is, if g ∈
Mod(S) then i(µ, ν) i(g(µ), g(ν)) for any µ, ν ∈ Curr(S).
(3) i(µ, µ) 0 if and only if µ ∈ ML(S).
(4) If ν ∈ Curr(S) is filling and L > 0, then the set
{µ ∈ Curr(S) | i(µ, ν) ≤ L}
is a compact set.
The first two statements follow from the definition of the intersection form,
while the last two are results by Bonahon, see [Bon86].
We define the space of projective geodesic currents to be
PCurr(S) (Curr(S) \ {0}) /R+ .
10
V. ERLANDSSON AND C. UYANIK
J
x
•γ̃x
•
I
Figure 1. Intersection of a curve γ with a current µ: i(γ, µ)
µ(I × J). Here η γ is represented by the solid blue segment and
∂ρ G(η γ ) I × J.
It follows from (4) above that PCurr(S) is a compact space.
Next we show how to obtain continuous length functions on Curr(S) from
the intersection form. Fix a filling current ν ∈ Curr(S). Define
` ν (µ) i(ν, µ)
for all µ ∈ Curr(S). By the linearity and continuity of the intersection form,
` ν is continuous and homogenous on Curr(S). Furthermore, since ν is filling,
it follows from (1) above that ` ν is positive. Hence the function above defines
a continuous length function
` ν : Curr(S) → R.
Moreover, this is the unique continuous extension of the length function on
the set of curves defined by
` ν (γ) i(ν, γ)
for all curves γ on S. In section 3 we will see that many other notions of
lengths of curves have unique continuous extensions to length functions on
Curr(S).
We end this section by noting that the intersection form can also be defined
for geodesic currents of surfaces with boundary, and refer reader to [DLR10]
for the definitions. For simplicity of the exposition we assume throughout
that S is a closed surface although the results presented here have generalizations that also hold for the case of compact surfaces. In the presence of
cusps however, the intersection form (when defined) is no longer continuous
unless we restrict our attention to currents with compact support.
LENGTH FUNCTIONS AND APPLICATIONS TO DYNAMICS AND COUNTING
11
3. Length functions on space of currents
Recall that by a curve on S we mean a free homotopy class of a primitive
closed curve, and we view the set of curves on S as a subset of Curr(S). As
before, a length function on Curr(S) is a positive, homogenous function, and
a length function on the set of curves is any positive function. In section 2.6
we saw that the geometric intersection number on the set of curves extends
continuously to a bilinear form on pairs of currents and hence, fixing a filling
curve (or current) ν, the length function
` ν (γ) i(ν, γ)
on the set of curves, extends continuously to a length function on currents,
defined by
` ν (µ) i(ν, µ)
for all µ ∈ Curr(S). There are many ways to define the length of a curve
on a surface and it is natural to ask which other notions of length extends
continuously to the space of currents. More concretely, let ρ be a (possibly singular) Riemannian metric on S. Then ρ naturally induces a length
function ` ρ (·) on the set of curves where the length of a curve γ is defined
to be the ρ-length of a shortest representative of γ. In the case when ρ is
a negatively curved metric, this is the length of the unique geodesic representative in the homotopy class of γ. Another natural length function on
the set of curves is given by first identifying a curve on S with a conjugacy
class in the fundamental group π1 (S) and, then for a fixed a generating set of
π1 (S), defining the length of a curve to be the minimal number of generators
needed to represent the corresponding conjugacy class. In general, given a
geodesic metric space (X, d) on which π1 (S) acts discretely and cocompactly
by isometries, one can ask whether the translation length of a curve γ
` X (γ) inf d(x, γ(x))
x∈X
(3.1)
extends continuously to a length function on the space of currents. Note
that when X is the universal cover of S equipped with a Riemannian metric,
or X is the Cayley graph with respect to a generating set of π1 (S), this length
agrees with the notions described above.
We will see that in many cases such a continuous extension exists. In
particular, in section 3.1 below, we explain why it exists for any (possibly
singular) non-positively curved Riemannian metric on S, through the use
of Liouville currents and their relation to the intersection form on Curr(S).
Similar arguments show that the word length with respect to certain (wellchosen) generating sets extends continuously to a length function on the
space of currents.
12
V. ERLANDSSON AND C. UYANIK
However, such a continuous extension does not always exist. Instead, we
will see in section 3.2 that the stable length function defined by
1
` X (γ n )
n→∞ n
always extends continuously to a length function on Curr(S).
Finally, in section 3.3, we will see that the two approaches of defining
an extension (using intersection with a special current, and considering the
stable length) are intimately related.
sl X (γ) lim
3.1. Length of currents through Liouville currents. In this section we explain how the length function of curves with respect to any (possibly singular) non-positively curved Riemannian metric on S can be extended continuously to a length function on the space of currents on S.
First, fix a hyperbolic metric ρ on S. The hyperbolic length of a homotopy
class of a closed curve γ is defined as the length of the ρ-geodesic representative, and denoted by ` ρ (γ). There exists a current associated with ρ, called
its Liouville current and denoted by L ρ , whose intersection form with curves
on S determines the length function induced by ρ, that is:
i(γ, L ρ ) ` ρ (γ)
(3.2)
for all curves γ on S.
Here we describe two equivalent definitions of the Liouville current and
refer reader to [AL, Bon88, HP97, Ota90] for more details. Recall that a
current is a π1 (S)-invariant Radon measure on
1
1
G(S̃) S∞
× S∞
\ ∆ /(x, y) ∼ (y, x).
First we define the Liouville measure L on the hyperbolic plane H2 . Let G(H2 )
denote the set of all bi-infinite geodesics in H2 , which we identify with their
endpoints on the unit circle S 1 . Let [a, b] and [c, d] be two non-empty disjoint
intervals on S 1 . Define
L ([a, b] × [c, d]) log
(a − c)(b − d)
(a − d)(b − c)
(3.3)
whenever a, b, c, d are four distinct points, and set L ([a, b] × [c, d]) 0 if
one of the intervals is a singleton. The map L extends uniquely to a Radon
measure on G(H2 ) (see [Bon88]) and is invariant under the action of π1 (S)
since the cross-ratio in (3.3) is invariant under this action. In the disk model
of H2 we have, using local coordinates (e iα , e iβ ),
Lρ
dαdβ
|e iα − b iβ | 2
LENGTH FUNCTIONS AND APPLICATIONS TO DYNAMICS AND COUNTING
13
where dαdβ is the Lebesgue measure defined by the Euclidean metric on
S1 , and in particular L is absolutely continuous with respect to the Lebesgue
measure (see, for example, [AL]). Now, given a hyperbolic metric ρ on S
the universal cover S̃ with the pull-back metric ρ̃ is isometric to H2 and the
1 is homeomorphic to S 1 . We define L , the Liouville current
boundary S∞
ρ
with respect to ρ, to be the pull-back of L through this homeomorphism.
Alternatively, one can define the Liouville current in the following way. Let
η̃ be a ρ̃-geodesic arc in S̃, parametrized at unit-speed by η̃ : (−a, a) → η̃(t).
Let G( η̃) denote the set of all ρ̃-geodesics in S̃ that intersect η̃ transversely.
Note that each geodesic in G(η̃) is uniquely determined by its point of
intersection η̃(t) with η̃ and its angle of intersection (chosen in an arbitrary
but consistent way). This gives rise to a homeomorphism
h η : (−a, a) × (0, π) → G(η̃).
Consider the measure on (−a, a) × (0, π) defined by
1
ds sin(θ)dθdt.
2
We push forward this measure through h η to obtain a measure on G( η̃).
Lastly, we further push the measure forward through the homeomorphism
∂ρ : G( ρ̃) → G(S̃)
which maps each geodesic in G( η̃) to its endpoints. The resulting measure
is a Radon measure on G(S̃). Furthermore, since π1 (S) acts by isometries on
S̃, the measure is invariant under its action. This measure is the Liouville
measure L ρ and agrees with the previous definition.
While the closed formula in the first definition makes it easier to state, the
construction involved in the latter makes (3.2) more natural to see. Indeed,
integrating ds over G( η̃) for a unit-speed parametrized geodesic arc η̃ gives
exactly the length of η̃.
The existence of Liouville currents for hyperbolic metrics allows us to
embed the Teichmüller space of S into the space of geodesics currents, as
shown by Bonahon [Bon88]. More precisely, let (X, f ) be a point in the
Teichmüller space, and ` X and L X be the corresponding length function on
curves and the Liouville current, respectively. Then, we have:
Theorem 3.1. [Bon88] The map
(X, f ) 7→ L X
defines an embedding Teich(S) ,→ Curr(S) satisfying
i(γ, L X ) ` X (γ)
for all curves γ on S.
14
V. ERLANDSSON AND C. UYANIK
Note that, since the intersection form is continuous and bilinear on Curr(S)×
Curr(S), as discussed in section 2.6, the hyperbolic length function has a continuous extension to a length function on Curr(S) by setting
` ρ (µ) i(µ, L ρ )
for all µ ∈ Curr(S). The positivity of this function follows from the fact that
the Liouville current is filling and hence i(µ, L ρ ) 0 if and only if µ is the
0-current. Moreover, this extension is unique due to the following theorem
by Otal [Ota90].
Theorem 3.2. [Ota90] Suppose µ1 , µ2 ∈ Curr(S). If i(µ1 , γ) i(µ2 , γ) for all
curves γ on S, then µ1 µ2 .
More generally, let ρ be any metric on S, and let ` ρ (γ) denote the length
of a shortest representative in the homotopy class of a curve γ. We say L ρ is
a Liouville current for ρ if equation (3.2) holds, that is
i(γ, L ρ ) ` ρ (γ)
for all curves γ on S. Note that when such a current exists it must be unique
and is necessarily a filling current.
As explained above, a Liouville current exists for any hyperbolic metric on S. Otal [Ota90] showed the existence of a Liouville current for any
(variable) negatively curved metric on S. By work of Duchin-LeiningerRafi [DLR10] and Bankovic-Leininger [BL18] such a current also exists for
any non-positively curved Euclidean cone metric on S. Finally, Constantine
[Con18] extended these results to any non-positively curved (singular) Riemannian metric, giving the Liouville current associated to any such metric
(in fact, also for the larger class of so-called no conjugate points cone metrics,
see [Con18] for the definition). We record a consequence of this sequence of
results here:
Theorem 3.3. [Con18, Proposition 4.4] Let ρ be any (possibly singular) nonpositively curved Riemannian metric on S and let ` ρ (γ) denote the ρ-length of a
shortest representative in the homotopy class of γ. Then the length function ` ρ on
the set of curves extends continuously to a length function
` ρ : Curr(S) → R.
Moreover, this extension is unique.
We note that Liouville currents also exist in other settings. Notably,
Martone–Zhang proved the existence of such currents in the context of
Hitchin and maximal representations, see [MZ16] for details. In another
direction, Sasaki proved the existence of a bilinear intersection functional on
LENGTH FUNCTIONS AND APPLICATIONS TO DYNAMICS AND COUNTING
15
the space of subsets currents on surfaces, and proved Liouville type equalities, [KN13, Sas17]. We refer interested reader to these papers as they are
beyond the scope of this paper.
From a more algebraic viewpoint, one can consider the word metric on
π1 (S) with respect to a fixed generating set: We choose a base point p on
S and identify the elements of π1 (S) with loops based at p. Since this
group is finitely generated, we choose a finite, symmetric generating set
G { g1±1 , g 2±1 , . . . , g ±1
n }. Given a conjugacy class [γ] (or, equivalently, a
homotopy class of a curve γ) we define the word length of the conjugacy
class [γ] with respect to G to be
n
` G (γ) min |k 1 | + |k2 | + · · · |k m | |
g ik11 g ik22
···
g ikmm
o
∈ [γ] .
Note that this definition is independent of the choice of representative of
[γ].
We say a generating set G is simple if the loops g i in G are simple and
pairwise disjoint except at the base point p (see Figure 2 for an example). Note that there are many such generating sets, including any one
vertex triangulation of S or the standard generating set for a genus g surface
{a 1 , b 1 , a 2 , b 2 , . . . a g , b g } with the relation [a 1 , b 1 ] · · · [a g , b g ] 1.
η
α
δ
β
γ
Figure 2. A genus 2 surface S with a simple (non-minimal)
generating set G {α±1 , β±1 , γ±1 , δ±1 , η±1 }.
In [Erl16] it is shown that, given a simple generating set G, there exists a
collection of curves ν ν(G), depending only on the generating set, such
that the word length of a curve is given exactly by its geometric intersection
number with this curve:
Theorem 3.4. [Erl16, Theorem 1.2] Let G be a simple generating set for π1 (S).
Then there exists a collection of curves ν ν(G) on S such that
` G (γ) i(ν, γ)
for all curves γ in S. Moreover, ν is unique with this property.
16
V. ERLANDSSON AND C. UYANIK
By viewing the set of curves as a subset of Curr(S), if G is a simple generating set for π1 (S), then the above results says that there exists a (unique)
Liouville current associated to the corresponding word metric. In particular,
it follows that the word length extends continuously to the space of currents:
Corollary 3.5. [Erl16, Corollary 1.3] Let G be a simple generating set for π1 (S).
Then the word length with respect to G on the set of curves extends continuously to
a length function
` G : Curr(S) → R.
Moreover, this extension is unique.
3.2. Stable length of currents. There are many notions of lengths not covered by the Liouville currents explained above. Two such occasions are the
length of a curve with respect to a Riemannian metric which attains positive
curvature values at places, and the word length with respect to a non-simple
generating set. In fact, in these settings such currents do not necessarily
exist. For instance, if we consider the word metric with respect to a nonsimple generating set then we observe that the length function cannot extend
continuously to a length function on the space of geodesic currents. To see
this, consider the case where S is the once-punctured torus and let a, b be
the standard generators for the free group π1 (S). Then, the word length
with respect to the generating set G {a ±1 , b ±1 , a ±2 }, does not extend to
a continuous homogeneous
function on Curr(S). Indeed, the sequence of
1 2n
currents 2n a b converges to the current a as n → ∞ and hence if such a
function ` G existed, continuity would imply that
`G
1 2n
a b → ` G (a) 1
2n
while, on the other hand, homogeneity would imply
`G
1 2n
1
n+1
1
a b
` G (a 2n b)
→
2n
2n
2n
2
as n → ∞, a contradiction.
However, as shown in [EPS16], if we consider the stable length of curves
instead, which we describe below, this length function always extends continuously to the space of geodesic currents.
Let X be any geodesic metric space on which π1 (S) acts discretely and cocompactly by isometries. For a conjugacy class [γ] in π1 (S) (or, equivalently,
a curve γ on S), define its translation length ` X (γ) with respect to X as in
(3.1). Then the stable length of [γ] is defined to be
1
1
sl X (γ) lim ` X (γ n ) lim
inf d(x, γ n (x)).
n→∞ n
n→∞ n x∈X
LENGTH FUNCTIONS AND APPLICATIONS TO DYNAMICS AND COUNTING
17
Again, this definition is independent of the choice of the representative in
the conjugacy class. In [EPS16] it is shown that, with X as above, this notion
of length always extends continuously to Curr(S):
Theorem 3.6. [EPS16, Theorem 1.5] Let X be a geodesic metric space on which
π1 (S) acts discretely and cocompactly by isometries. Then the stable length function
sl X on the set of curves extends continuously to a length function
sl X : Curr(S) → R.
Moreover, this extension is unique.
The proof of Theorem 3.6 is rather involved, with the main difficulty being
how to define the stable length of a current, and we will not explain it here,
but refer reader to [EPS16]. Instead we give some consequences of Theorem
3.6. If we equip S with any Riemannian metric and let X be its universal
cover S̃ we immediately get the following corollary:
Corollary 3.7. Let ρ be any Riemannian metric on S. For a curve γ, let ` ρ (γ) be
the ρ-length of a shortest representative. Then the stable length defined by
1
` ρ (γ n )
n→∞ n
has a unique continuous extension to a length function
st ρ (γ) lim
st ρ : Curr(S) → R+ .
Similarly, if we let X be the Cayley graph with respect to a finite generating
set of π1 (S) we also have:
Corollary 3.8. Let G be any finite generating set for π1 (S). Let ` G (γ) denote the
shortest word length of a representative in the conjugacy class of γ. Then the stable
length defined by
1
st G (γ) lim ` G (γ n )
n→∞ n
has a unique continuous extension to a length function
st G : Curr(S) → R+ .
We remark that in [EPS16] Theorem 3.6 was proved in a more general setting, namely when the surface group is replaced by any torsion free Gromov
hyperbolic group Γ. It is shown that in this setting, the corresponding stable
length of a conjugacy class extends to a continuous length function on the
space of (oriented) currents on Γ. This space, introduced by Bonahon [Bon91]
and denoted Curr(Γ), is defined to be the set of Γ-invariant Radon measures
on the double boundary
(∂Γ × ∂Γ \ ∆) /∼
18
V. ERLANDSSON AND C. UYANIK
where ∂Γ is the Gromov boundary of Γ and where we identify (γ1 , γ2 ) with
(γ2 , γ1 ) (see, for example, [KB02]). Since we will not use this more general
setting here we refer to [Bon91] and [EPS16] for the precise definitions.
We also remark that Theorem 3.6 was proved by Bonahon [Bon91] in the
case when X is "uniquely geodesic at infinity", i.e. any two points on the
(Gromov) boundary at infinity of X determine a unique geodesic between
them. However, this condition is not satisfied in general for the universal
cover of Riemannian metrics, nor for Cayley graphs.
Finally we note that, in [Bon91], Bonahon remarks that it should be possible to remove not only the uniquely geodesic hypothesis, which Theorem
3.6 proves, but also the cocompact assumption. The proof of Theorem 3.6
in [EPS16] still requires Γ to act cocompactly on X and it is an interesting
question whether it is a necessary condition.
Question 3.9. Does Theorem 3.6 still hold for a surface group that acts
discretely, but not cocompactly on X?
It should be noted that the assumption on the action to be discrete cannot
be removed, as shown by Bonahon [Bon91].
3.3. Stable length as a generalization of intersection length. At first glance,
extending length of curves to length functions on currents through the intersection length or by considering the stable length might seem like very
different approaches. However, as we will observe below, the two notions
can be unified: given a filling current ν one can construct a metric space
(X, d) on which π1 (S) acts discretely and cocompactly by isometries, and
such that
sl X (γ) i(ν, γ)
for all curves γ on S. The basis for our metric is a semi-distance presented
by Glorieux in [Glo17], described below.
Fix a hyperbolic metric ρ on S and let S̃ be the universal covering equipped
with the pull back metric. We define a metric space (X, d) in the following
way. As in section 3.1, for a geodesic arc η̃ let G( η̃) denote the set of geodesics
in S̃ that intersect η̃ transversely. Let ∂ρ G( η̃) denote the image of G( η̃) under
the homeomorphism that maps each geodesic to its pair of endpoints. Let ν
be a filling current in Curr(S). For two distinct points x, y ∈ S̃, define
d 0(x, y) ν(∂ρ G( η̃))
where η̃ is the geodesic arc connecting x and y. Set d 0(x, x) 0 for all x ∈ S̃.
Note that d 0 is symmetric, i.e. d 0(x, y) d 0(y, x), and d 0(x, y) ≥ 0 for all
x, y ∈ S̃ (although d 0 might not separate points). Furthermore, by definition
LENGTH FUNCTIONS AND APPLICATIONS TO DYNAMICS AND COUNTING
19
of the intersection number (see section 2.6), if x lies on the axis of an element
γ ∈ π1 (S) then
d 0(x, γ(x)) i(ν, γ).
(3.4)
Moreover, in [Glo17] it is shown that
(1) d 0 satisfies the triangle inequality, i.e. d 0(x, y) ≤ d 0(x, z) + d 0(z, y) for
all x, y, x ∈ S̃,
(2) i(ν, γ) ≤ d 0(x, γ(x)) for all x ∈ S̃ and γ ∈ π1 (S).
In particular, d 0 is a semi-distance. In [Glo17] d 0 was used to find the critical
exponent for geodesic currents, here we use it to construct our desired metric
space. Define
X S̃/∼
0
where x ∼ y if and only if d (x, y) 0, equipped with the metric d induced
by d 0. That is,
d [x], [y] d 0(x, y)
for all [x], [y] ∈ X, where x and y are any representatives of [x] and [y],
respectively. Using 2 above and equation (3.4) we see that the stable length
with respect to X agrees with the length function defined by intersection
with ν:
1
1
sl X (γ) lim
inf d(x, γ n (x)) lim i(ν, γ n ) i(ν, γ)
n→∞ n x∈X
n→∞ n
for any conjugacy class [γ] in π1 (S) (or, equivalently, any curve γ on S).
Since ν is π1 (S)-invariant, π1 (S) acts by isometries on (X, d) and, since the
action is cocompact on S̃ it is also cocompact on (X, d). Moreover, it is not
hard to see that π1 (S) acts discretely on (X, d) since ν is filling: if there exists
a sequence (γn ) in π1 (S) and x ∈ S̃ such that d(x, γn (x)) → 0 as n → ∞,
then, by 2, i(ν, γn ) → 0 as n → ∞, contradicting the fact that ν is filling.
We have the following result:
Theorem 3.10. Let ν be any filling current. Then there exists a metric space X on
which π1 (S) acts discretely and cocompactly by isometries such that
sl X (γ) i(ν, γ)
for all curves γ on S.
4. Applications to counting curves
In [Mir08, Mir16] Maryam Mirzakhani gives the asymptotic growth rate
of the number of curves of bounded length, in each Mod(S)-orbit, as the
length grows. As before, by a curve γ on S we mean a free homotopy class
of a closed immersed curve, and its length ` ρ (γ) with respect to a metric ρ
is the ρ-length of a shortest representative. If ρ is negatively curved, this
20
V. ERLANDSSON AND C. UYANIK
is the ρ-length of the unique geodesic representative in the homotopy class.
Given a curve γ0 on S and a hyperbolic metric ρ on S, Mirzakhani showed
that the number of curves in the Mod(S)-orbit of γ0 as L grows is asymptotic
to a constant multiple of L 6g−6 :
Theorem 4.1. [Mir08, Mir16, Theorem 1.1] Let γ0 be a curve on S, and ρ be a
hyperbolic metric on S. Then
#{γ ∈ Mod(S) · γ0 | ` ρ (γ) ≤ L}
C γ0 · m ρ
L 6g−6
for some C γ0 > 0, and m ρ m Th ({λ ∈ ML(S) | ` ρ (λ) ≤ 1}) where m Th is the
Thurston measure on ML(S).
lim
L→∞
The constant C γ0 in Theorem 4.1 is independent of the hyperbolic metric
ρ. In fact, Mirzakhani [Mir08] showed that
n γ0
C γ0
mg
where n γ0 > 0 depends only on γ0 and
mg
∫
M
m ρ dvolWP
(4.1)
where the integral is taken over the moduli space
M Teich(S)/Mod(S)
with respect to the Weil–Petersson volume form.
The Thurston measure is the natural Mod(S)-invariant locally finite measure
on ML(S) given by the piecewise linear structure coming from train-track
coordinates. See section 4.1 for details.
The purpose of this section is to discuss a generalization of the theorem
of Mirzakhani above, based on the previous section (see Theorem 4.3). We
will explain why the same asymptotic behavior as in Theorem 4.1 holds for
other metrics on S, in particular for any Riemannian metric. The results
presented are contained in [ES16], [Erl16] and [EPS16]. The idea behind the
proof of the generalization to other metrics crystallized over the above series
of papers, so we provide a unified but brief explanation for the statements
and proofs of these results.
Remark 4.2. Theorem 4.1, as well as its generalization Theorem 4.3 below,
holds for any finite type, orientable surface of negative Euler characteristic
(other than the thrice punctured sphere). That is, we can allow S to have
n punctures or boundary components, and the same asymptotic behavior
holds (where we replace 6g − 6 in the exponent with 6g − 6 + 2n). However,
LENGTH FUNCTIONS AND APPLICATIONS TO DYNAMICS AND COUNTING
21
somewhat surprisingly, orientability is a necessary condition. For nonorientable surfaces the theorems fail, see [Gen17, Mag17].
4.1. Thurston measure. Recall, from section 2.3, that the space ML(S) of
measured laminations has a Mod(S)-invariant piecewise linear manifold
structure. Moreover, the PL-manifold is equipped with a Mod(S)-invariant
symplectic structure, which gives rise to a Mod(S)-invariant measure in the
Lebesgue class. This is the Thurston measure m Th . It is infinite, but locally
finite, and satisfies
m Th (L · U) L 6g−6 m Th (U)
for U ⊂ ML(S) and L > 0 (see [Thu80]). Furthermore, as shown by Masur
[Mas85], the Thurston measure m Th is ergodic with respect to the Mod(S)action on ML(S), and is the only (up to scaling) invariant measure in the
Lebesgue class.
In this section we explain how one can see the Thurston measure (up to
scaling) as a limit of a sequence of measures, which gives perhaps a more
intuitive feeling of what this measure is.
For each L, define a measure on ML(S) by
mL
1
L 6g−6
Õ
γ∈MLZ (S)
δ1γ
L
where δ x denotes the Dirac measure centered at x and MLZ (S) is the subset of
ML(S) corresponding to integral multicurves. We will show that, as L → ∞,
these measures converge to a multiple of the Thurston measure, i.e.
lim
L→∞
1
L6g−6
Õ
δ 1 γ c · mTh
γ∈MLZ (S)
L
(4.2)
for some c > 0. Note that each m L is Mod(S)-invariant, and hence so is any
limit. We will show that the limit is moreover in the Lebesgue class and it
follows that it must be a multiple of the Thurston measure.
Fix a finite collection T of train tracks, giving the piecewise linear structure
of ML(S). Let τ ∈ T and consider the homeomorphism f τ that maps the
subset of ML(S) consisting of all measured laminations carried by τ to the
corresponding cone C(τ) in R6g−6 (i.e. the set of solutions to the switch
equations of τ). Now, the image under f τ of the set of all integral multicurves
carried by τ corresponds to the integer points in C(τ). Hence pushing the
measure m L forward through f τ we get the following measure on (the cone
in) R6g−6 :
Õ
1
L
m τ 6g−6
δ 1 p.
L
L
6g−6
p∈Z
22
V. ERLANDSSON AND C. UYANIK
First we note that the family (m τL )L is precompact in the space of Radon measures on R6g−6 , meaning that any sequence of measures has a subsequence
that weakly converges to a measure. To see this, let BR be a (closed) ball of
radius R in R6g−6 . We will show that
lim sup m τL (BR ) < ∞.
(4.3)
L→∞
Since the (closed) unit ball is compact in the weak-∗ topology, (4.3) implies
precompactness of (m τL )L . Note that
m τL (BR )
#{p ∈ Z6g−6 | p ∈ BR·L }
(4.4)
L 6g−6
and the right hand side converges to the Lebesgue measure of the ball of
radius R. Hence (4.3) holds. Now let m be any limit point of (m τL )L . Then,
(4.4) also implies that m is a translation invariant Borel measure on R6g−6
and hence must be a multiple of the Lebesgue measure (since this is the
unique measure, up to scaling, with this property). We have: For for any
(L n )n with L n → ∞ there exists a subsequence (L n k )k such that
Lnk
mτ
c ·L
for some c > 0 as k → ∞, where L denotes the Lebesgue measure. Hence, to
prove (4.2) we need to show that c is independent of the subsequence. Note
that, as above,
# p ∈ Z6g−6 | p ∈ BL
L
m τ (B1 )
L 6g−6
and the right hand side converges as L → ∞ to the Lebesque measure of the
unit ball B1 . Hence the limit of the right hand side does not depend on the
subsequence and (4.2) follows.
4.2. Counting with respect to length functions. Given a hyperbolic metric
ρ on S and its corresponding Liouville current L ρ , one can replace the length
function ` ρ (·) in Theorem 4.1 with the intersection function i(L ρ , ·). In view
of this, one can consider the following generalization of the limit appearing
in the mentioned theorem:
#{γ ∈ Mod(S) · γ0 | i(ν, γ) ≤ L}
lim
(4.5)
L→∞
L6g−6
where γ0 is a curve on S and ν is any filling current. (Note that we require ν
to be filling to guarantee that there are only finitely many curves intersecting
ν a bounded number of times). In particular, by letting ν be a Liouville
current for another metric, such as a variable negatively curved or Euclidean
LENGTH FUNCTIONS AND APPLICATIONS TO DYNAMICS AND COUNTING
23
cone metric, this is equivalent to asking if the limit (4.5) exists with respect
to this metric.
In [ES16] it was shown that limit (4.5) exists for any filling current ν, and in
fact, more generally when the intersection function i(ν, ·) is replaced by any
continuous length function `(·) defined on the space of currents. Recall that
we say ` is a length function on Curr(S) if it is homogeneous and `(µ) ≥ 0
for all currents µ and `(µ) 0 if and only if µ 0.
Theorem 4.3. [ES16] Let ` : Curr(S) → R be any continuous length function
and γ0 a curve on S. Then
#{γ ∈ Mod(S) · γ0 | `(γ) ≤ L}
C γ0 · m `
L 6g−6
> 0 is the same constant as in Theorem 4.1, and
lim
L→∞
where C γ0
m ` mTh ({λ ∈ ML(S) | `(λ) ≤ 1}) .
Here we give an outline of the arguments involved in proving Theorem
4.3, and refer to [ES16] for the details.
The main idea to prove the convergence of the limit
#{γ ∈ Mod(S) · γ0 | `(γ) ≤ L}
(4.6)
L6g−6
is to consider a sequence of measures on Curr(S) analogous to the measures
on ML(S) in section 4.1. Let γ0 ∈ S be a curve and define, for each L > 0, a
measure on Curr(S) by
lim
L→∞
m γL0
1
L 6g−6
Õ
δ 1 γ.
γ∈Mod(S)·γ0
L
Note that each m γL0 is locally finite and invariant under the action of Mod(S).
In fact, we will see that, as L → ∞ they converge to a Mod(S)-invariant
measure on ML(S) that is absolutely continuous with respect to the Thurston
measure, and hence, using the ergodicity of m Th , they must converge to a
multiple of this measure:
Theorem 4.4. [ES16, EPS16, Theorem 5.1] Let γ0 be any curve on S. Then
lim m γL0 C γ0 · m Th
L→∞
where C γ0 > 0 is the constant in Theorem 4.1.
First we explain why Theorem 4.4 implies Theorem 4.3. Fix a continuous
length function ` : Curr(S) → R and let
B ` {µ ∈ Curr(S) | `(µ) ≤ 1}.
24
V. ERLANDSSON AND C. UYANIK
Note that limit (4.6) is equivalent to
lim m γL0 (B ` ).
L→∞
Note that continuity of ` implies that B ` is a closed set. Also, for any
measurable set U satisfying U ∩ L · U ∅ for any positive L , 1, the scaling
properties of the Thurston measure imply that mTh (U) 0. To see this, note
that for all L , 1
m(U ∪ L · U) m(U) + m(L · U) m(U)(1 + L 6g−6 )
and letting L → 1 we get m Th (U) 2mTh (U), i.e. m Th (U) 0. In particular,
mTh (∂B ` ) 0. Hence, by the Portmanteau Theorem, see [Bil99],
lim m γL0 C γ0 · m Th
L→∞
implies that
lim m γL0 (B ` ) C γ0 · m Th (B ` )
L→∞
where we view mTh as a measure on Curr(S) with full support on the subspace ML(S). Theorem 4.3 follows.
Next we outline the arguments proving Theorem 4.4. In an attempt to aid
the reader we first outline the main steps involved in the proof:
(1) Let m γ0 be any limit point of the family (m γL0 )L , and note that it is
Mod(S)-invariant.
(2) We show that m γ0 is supported on ML(S), and
(3) that m γ0 is absolutely continuous with respect to the Thurston measure m Th on ML(S).
(4) Ergodicity of m Th with respect to Mod(S) together with the steps
above, imply that m γ0 C · m Th for some C > 0.
(5) Finally, using Mirzakhani’s theorem (Theorem 4.1) we show that the
constant C above does not depend on the subsequence and is in fact
equal to C γ0 . Hence m γL0 → C γ0 · m Th .
We formalize the conclusion of step 4 below:
Proposition 4.5. [ES16, Proposition 4.1] Let (L n )n be any sequence of positive
numbers such that L n → ∞. Then there is a subsequence (L n k )k such that
Ln
m γ0 k → C · m Th
for some C > 0, as k → ∞.
As above, due to the Portmanteau theorem, we get the following consequence:
LENGTH FUNCTIONS AND APPLICATIONS TO DYNAMICS AND COUNTING
25
Corollary 4.6. Let ` : Curr(S) → R be a continuous length function and let (L n )n
be any sequence of positive numbers such that L n → ∞. Then there is a subsequence
(L n k )k such that
Ln
m γ0 k (B ` ) → C · m Th (B ` )
for some C > 0, as k → ∞.
The key idea behind proving Proposition 4.5 is to associate to each (generic)
curve in Mod(S) · γ0 a simple multi-curve. Specifically, we define a map
π γ 0 : S γ 0 → MLZ (S)
where S γ 0 ⊂ Mod(S) · γ0 is a generic subset such that
(1 − )`(γ) < `(π γ 0 (γ)) < (1 + )`(γ).
(4.7)
We say a set S is generic if
#S
L6g−6
→0
as L → ∞. The existence of such a map results from the following observation, which says that the expected angle of self-intersection of a long curve
is arbitrarily small.
Theorem 4.7. [ES16, Theorem 1.2] Let ∠ (γ) denote the largest angle among the
self-intersection angles of a curve γ. Let γ0 ⊂ S be a curve and ρ a hyperbolic
metric. Then
#{γ ∈ Mod(S) · γ0 | ` ρ (γ) ≤ L, ∠ (γ) ≥ δ}
lim
0
L→∞
L6g−6
for all δ > 0.
The proof of Theorem 4.7 is quite involved (see [ES16, Section 3.3]), but
the general idea is that large self-intersection angles results in ideal 4-gons
on the surface which most of the curves have to avoid. The set of curves on
S which do not intersect a 4-gon must live on a proper subsurface and hence
the number of these curves of length bounded by L must grow at a slower
rate than L 6g−6 . This idea is inspired by the fact that the subspace of ML(S)
of measured laminations carried by non-maximal train tracks (i.e. train
tracks that have complementary regions larger than triangles) has dimension
strictly less than 6g − 6.
Armed with Theorem 4.7, we can resolve the self-intersections and end up
with a simple multi-curve whose length is close to the length of the original
curve (see [ES16, Section 3.4] for details), and this is the idea for the map π γ 0 .
In particular, for any > 0 there is an angle bound δ > 0 such that any curve
γ with self-intersection angles less than δ is mapped to a simple multi-curve
π γ 0 (γ) satisfying (4.7). These curves are what make up the generic set S γ 0 .
26
V. ERLANDSSON AND C. UYANIK
We fix > 0 and suppress the superscript in π γ 0 for ease of notation. It
is clear that π γ0 is finite-to-one, but the main useful property of the map,
and the key technical difficulty of the proof (details of which will be omitted
here, see [ES16, Section 2.4]) is that it is uniformly bounded-to-1. That is:
Lemma 4.8. [ES16, Proposition 3.9] There exists a constant K K(γ0 ) > 0 such
that
|π−1
γ0 (λ)| < K
(4.8)
for all λ ∈ MLZ (S).
We note that any limit point m γ0 is locally finite and Mod(S)-invariant
since this is true for each m γL0 . We then use Lemma 4.8 to show that any limit
point is also uniformly continuous with respect to the Thurston measure.
To do so, we first push forward the measure m γL0 via π γ0 resulting in the
following measures supported on ML(S):
n γL0
1
L6g−6
Õ
|π−1
γ0 (λ)|δ 1 λ .
L
λ∈MLZ (S)
It is not difficult to see m γ0 is a limit point of the family (m γL0 )L if an only if it is
a limit point of the family (n γL0 )L . In particular, any limit point is supported
on ML(S), completing step 2.
Now, (4.8) implies that
n γL0
1
L 6g−6
Õ
λ∈MLZ (S)
|π −1
γ0 (λ)|δ 1 λ < K ·
L
1
L6g−6
Õ
λ∈MLZ (S)
δ1λ
L
and the right hand side converges to a multiple of m Th as L → ∞ (see (4.2)).
In particular, any limit point of (n γL0 )L , and hence of (m γL0 )L , is absolutely
continuous with respect to the Thurston measure, completing step 3.
Next, recall that, by a result of Masur [Mas85], the Thurston measure is
ergodic with respect to the action of Mod(S) on ML(S). Hence, since any
limit m γ0 of (m γL0 )L is invariant under this action and absolutely continuous
with respect to the Thurston measure, the only choice for m γ0 is a positive
multiple of the Thurston measure. This completes the argument for proving
Proposition 4.5 (and hence step 4).
Finally, we use Mirzakhani’s result (Theorem 4.1) to complete the outline of
the proof of Theorem 4.4. We need to show that the constant C in Proposition
4.5 is independent of the subsequence and that C is in fact equal to the
constant C γ0 .
LENGTH FUNCTIONS AND APPLICATIONS TO DYNAMICS AND COUNTING
27
Let ρ be a hyperbolic metric on S and L ρ the corresponding Liouville
current. Let ` ρ : Curr(S) → R be the length function defined by
` ρ (µ) i(µ, L ρ )
which agrees with the hyperbolic length on curves. Following the notation
above, let
B ` ρ {µ ∈ Curr(S) | i(µ, L ρ ) ≤ 1}.
By definition,
m γL0 (B ` ρ )
#{γ ∈ Mod(S) · γ0 | ` ρ (γ) ≤ L}
L 6g−6
.
By Theorem 4.1 we know that the right hand side converges to
C γ0 · m Th (B ` ρ ).
In particular, m γL0 (B ` ρ ) converges and by Corollary 4.6 it must converge to
C · m Th (B ` ρ ) for some C > 0. Hence we have C C γ0 , completing step 5, and
Theorem 4.4 follows.
Lastly, we note that Theorem 4.3 together with the statements in section 3
imply that we have the asymptotic growth
#{γ ∈ Mod(S) · γ0 | `(γ) ≤ L} ∼ const · L6g−6
for any of the length functions ` discussed there. In particular, it is true for
the length induced by any non-positive (singular) Riemannian metric on S
as well as for the stable length with respect to a geodesic metric space X
on which π1 (S) acts discretely and cocompactly by isometries (see Theorem
3.6). However, in [EPS16] it is shown that it is enough for the stable length to
extend to Curr(S) to conclude that the asymptotics above hold for the actual
(translation) length. In particular, it holds for any Riemannian metric on S.
Corollary 4.9. [EPS16, Corollaries 1.3 and 1.4] Let γ0 be a curve on S. If ρ is
any (possibly singular) Riemannian metric on S and ` ρ is the corresponding length
function on curves, then
lim
L→∞
#{γ ∈ Mod(S) · γ0 | ` ρ (γ) ≤ L}
L 6g−6
exists and is positive. Similarly, if we replace the length function with the word
length with respect to any finite generating set of π1 (S) then the corresponding limit
also exists and is positive.
28
V. ERLANDSSON AND C. UYANIK
4.3. Orbits of currents. We end by remarking that one could also ask
whether the limit in Theorem 4.3 exists if we look at the Mod(S)-orbit of
any current instead of a curve. Rafi-Souto proved that this is indeed the case:
Theorem 4.10. [RS17, Main Theorem] Let ` : Curr(S) → R be a continuous
length function. For any filling current ν ∈ Curr(S) we have
lim
#{µ ∈ Mod(S) · ν | `(µ) ≤ L}
L 6g−6
where C ν > 0 and m ` m Th ({λ ∈ ML | `(λ) ≤ 1}).
L→∞
Cν · m`
The constant C ν , as in Theorem 4.1 is independent of ` and can be written
as
nν
mg
where m g is the same constant as in (4.1). However, in [RS17] the constant
n ν , in the case when ν is filling, is also described:
Cν
n ν m Th ({λ ∈ ML | i(ν, λ) ≤ 1}).
The proof of Theorem 4.10 follows a similar logic to the proof of Theorem
4.3 above. However, in order to generalize Proposition 4.5 to hold also
when γ0 is a filling current, they combine this proposition together with a
deep result of Lindenstrauss-Mirzakhani [LM08] about the classifications of
invariant measures on ML(S).
We note that Theorem 4.10 holds also for surfaces with boundary, as do
Theorems 4.1 and 4.3, but unlike the latter two which also work for surfaces
with cusps, Theorem 4.10 requires S to be compact (or alternatively, that ν
has compact support).
As an application to Theorem 4.10, Rafi-Souto prove the asymptotic growth
of lattice points in Teichmüller space with respect to the Thurston metric. As
before, for a length function f : Curr(S) → R we let m f denote the constant
m f mTh ({λ ∈ ML(S) | f (λ) ≤ 1})
and we let m X denote the corresponding constant when f ` X , the hyperbolic length on X ∈ Teich(S).
Theorem 4.11. [RS17, Theorem 1.1] Let X, Y ∈ Teich(S). Then
lim
R→∞
#{ϕ ∈ Mod(S) | dTh (X, ϕ(Y)) ≤ R}
e (6g−6)R
m DX m Y
mg
where dTh denotes the Thurston metric on Teich(S), m g is as above, and
i(λ, µ)
.
λ∈ML(S) ` X (λ)
DX (µ) max
LENGTH FUNCTIONS AND APPLICATIONS TO DYNAMICS AND COUNTING
29
The analogous result of Theorem 4.11 when the Thurston metric is replaced by the Teichmüller metric was proved, using different methods, by
Athreya-Bufetov-Eskin-Mirzakhani in [ABEM12].
5. Dynamics of pseudo-Anosov homeomorphisms
The purpose of this section is to give a concise proof of a folklore result
using Bonahon’s intersection function on the space of currents: pseudoAnosov homeomorphisms of closed hyperbolic surfaces act on the space
of projective geodesic currents with uniform north-south dynamics (see
Theorem 5.1 below).
The idea of the proof is as follows: The set of non-zero currents that has
zero intersection with the stable current/lamination is precisely the positive
scalar multiples of the stable current/lamination. Similarly, the set of nonzero currents that has zero intersection with the unstable current/lamination
is precisely the positive scalar multiples of the unstable current/lamination,
see Lemma 5.2.
Using Lemma 5.2 we define continuous functions J+ and J− on the space of
projective currents which take the value 0 only on [λ + ] and [λ − ] respectively.
We then use these functions to construct neighborhoods of [λ + ] and [λ− ] and
use the properties of intersection function to get convergence estimates.
The proof we present here is motivated by Ivanov’s proof of north-south
dynamics in the setting of projective measured laminations [Iva92].
Theorem 5.1. Let S be closed hyperbolic surface and ϕ : S → S be a pseudoAnosov homeomorphism. Then ϕ acts on the space of projective geodesic currents
PCurr(S) with uniform north-south dynamics: The action of ϕ on PCurr(S) has
exactly two fixed points [λ + ] and [λ − ] and for any open neighborhood U± of [λ ± ]
and a compact set K ± ⊂ PCurr(S) \ [λ ∓ ], there exist an exponent M ≥ 1 such that
ϕ±n (K± ) ⊂ U± for all n ≥ M.
The proof of Theorem 5.1 consists of putting together a series of lemmas,
which we first state and prove.
Lemma 5.2. Let ϕ : S → S be a pseudo-Anosov homeomorphism on a closed hyperbolic surface and λ + and λ − be the corresponding stable and unstable laminations
for ϕ. Then,
i(λ ± , µ) 0 if and only if µ kλ ±
for some k ≥ 0.
Proof. Here we give a brief idea of the proof and refer reader to proof of
[Uya15, Proposition 3.1] for details in the case of non-closed surfaces, where
30
V. ERLANDSSON AND C. UYANIK
the proof is more involved. Let λ + be the stable lamination on S corresponding to the pseudo-Anosov homeomorphism f . The proof for λ − is almost
identical.
We first prove the easy direction of the statement. Namely, let µ kλ + ,
and α > 1 be such that ϕ(λ + ) αλ+ . Then, by properties of the intersection
number we have
i(kλ+ , λ+ ) i(ϕ n (kλ + ), ϕ n (λ + ))
i(α n kλ + , α n λ + )
α2n i(kλ + , λ+ )
which implies i(kλ + , λ+ ) 0.
For the forward implication, we first cut the surface along the leaves
of the stable lamination. The complementary regions are finite sided ideal
polygons, [CB88, Proposition 5.3]. Let µ be any current such that i(µ, λ+ ) 0.
Let ` be any leaf in the support of µ, since the projection of this leaf onto
the surface cannot intersect the leaves of the stable lamination transversely,
there are two possibilities for this projection. Either ` projects onto a leaf
of the lamination λ or it is a complete geodesic that is asymptotic to two
different sides of a complementary polygon. In the second case, this leaf
cannot support any measure, otherwise the corresponding current would
not be locally finite. Hence µ and λ + have the same support, and unique
ergodicity of λ + implies that µ kλ+ .
Fix a filling current ν on S, and consider the following two functions
J+ , J− : PCurr(S) → R≥0 defined by
J+ ([µ])
i(µ, λ+ )
i(µ, λ− )
, J− [µ]
i(µ, ν)
i(µ, ν)
where µ is any representative of [µ]. Note that J+ , J− are well defined and
continuous since the intersection function is continuous, and the denominator is non-zero by the choice of ν.
Lemma 5.3. Let α be the stretch factor for the pseudo-Anosov element ϕ and let ν
be a filling current. If K is a compact set in PCurr(S) \ [λ − ], then there exist C > 0
such that
1
C
≤ n
n
i(ϕ (µ), ν)
α i(µ, ν)
for all µ such that [µ] ∈ K.
LENGTH FUNCTIONS AND APPLICATIONS TO DYNAMICS AND COUNTING
31
Proof. Since PCurr(S) is compact, there exist 0 < C 1 < ∞ such that
J− ([µ])
i.e.
i(µ, λ− )
≤ C1
i(µ, ν)
i(µ, λ− ) ≤ C 1 i(µ, ν)
for all nonzero µ ∈ Curr(S).
Furthermore, by Lemma 5.2 the quantity i(µ, λ− ) is non-zero for any µ
such that [µ] ∈ PCurr(S) \ [λ − ]. Therefore, by compactness of K, there exist
C 2 > 0 such that
i(µ, λ− ) ≥ C 2 i(µ, ν)
for all µ with [µ] ∈ K.
From these two inequalities we obtain, for all µ such that [µ] ∈ K,
i(ϕ n (µ), ν) ≥
Setting C
1
1
i(ϕ n (µ), λ− )
i(µ, ϕ−n (λ − ))
C1
C1
1
i(µ, α n λ − )
C1
1 n
α i(µ, λ− )
C1
C2 n
≥
α i(µ, ν).
C1
C1
, the conclusion of the lemma follows.
C2
Lemma 5.4. Let U be an open neighborhood of [λ + ] and K be a compact set in
PCurr(S) \ [λ− ]. There exist M1 > 0 such that
ϕ n (K) ⊂ U
for all n ≥ M1 .
Proof. Since i(µ, λ+ ) 0 iff [µ] [λ + ], and PCurr(S) \ U is compact, the
function J+ ([µ]) has a positive absolute minimum on the set PCurr(S) \ U,
say > 0. Therefore, it suffices to prove that J+ (ϕ n [µ]) < for all [µ] ∈ K,
and for all large n in order to obtain the conclusion of the lemma.
On the other hand, PCurr(S) is compact, so the function J+ ([µ]) has an
upper bound, i.e. there exists 0 < D < ∞ such that
i(µ, λ+ )
≤D
i(µ, ν)
for all µ.
32
V. ERLANDSSON AND C. UYANIK
DC
< where α is
α2M1
the stretch factor of ϕ and C is the constant given by Lemma 5.3. Then, for
all [µ] ∈ K we have
Let > 0 be as above, and choose M1 > 0 such that
J+ (ϕ n [µ])
i(ϕ n (µ), λ+ ) i(µ, ϕ−n (λ + ))
i(ϕ n (µ), ν)
i(ϕ n (µ), ν)
α−n i(µ, λ+ )
i(ϕ n (µ), ν)
Cα−n i(µ, λ+ )
≤
α n i(µ, ν)
DC
≤ 2n <
α
for all n ≥ M1 .
We are now ready to prove the theorem:
Proof of Theorem 5.1. Using an argument symmetric to the one in the proof of
Lemma 5.4, we can show that given any compact set K ⊂ PCurr(S)\[λ − ] and
an open neighborhood U of [λ − ] there exist M2 > 0 such that ϕ−n (K) ⊂ U
for all n ≥ M2 . The theorem now follows by setting M max{M1 , M2 }.
In fact, we have much more precise information in terms of pointwise
dynamics:
Theorem 5.5. Let α > 1 be the stretch factor for ϕ. Then, for any [µ] , [λ− ],
lim α−n ϕ n (µ) c µ λ +
for some c µ > 0, and for any
n→∞
[µ0] ,
lim α
n→∞
for some c
µ0
[λ + ]
−n
ϕ−n (µ0) c µ0 λ −
> 0.
Proof. The proof builds on the analogous result in the case of laminations,
and nearly identical to the case where S has boundary components, see the
proof of [Uya15, Theorem 3.4].
Recall, from section 3.1, that given a hyperbolic metric ρ on S the hyperbolic length extends to a continuous length function ` on Curr(S) given
by
`(µ) i(L ρ , µ)
LENGTH FUNCTIONS AND APPLICATIONS TO DYNAMICS AND COUNTING
33
for all µ ∈ Curr(S), where L ρ is the Liouville currents associated to ρ. As
an application to this we get as a corollary to the north-south dynamics the
following generalization, to all curves, of a well known result about simple
closed curves:
Corollary 5.6. For any pseudo-Anosov homeomorphism ϕ : S → S of a closed,
orientable hyperbolic surface S, there exists M > 0 such that for any essential (not
necessarily simple) closed curve γ on S, either
`(ϕ k γ) > `(γ) or `(ϕ −k γ) > `(γ)
for all k ≥ M.
Proof. We will show that there exists M > 0 such that for all γ on S, the
following holds:
`(ϕ k γ) + `(ϕ−k γ)
>2
`(γ)
for all k ≥ M. Let L ρ be the Liouville current associated to the hyperbolic
metric ρ as in section 3.1. That is, `(µ) i(µ, L ρ ) for all µ ∈ Curr(S). Note
that, for all k,
`(ϕ k γ) i(ϕ k γ, L ρ ) i(γ, ϕ−k L ρ )
and
`(ϕ−k γ) i(ϕ−k γ, L ρ ) i(γ, ϕ k L ρ ).
Hence it suffices to prove that there exist M > 0 such that
i(γ, ϕ k L ρ ) + i(γ, ϕ−k L ρ )
`(γ)
>2
(5.1)
for all γ and for all k ≥ M.
Let α > 1 be the stretch factor for ϕ and λ + and λ − its stable and unstable
lamination, respectively. Using the properties of the intersection form we
have
i(γk , ϕ k L ρ ) + i(γk , ϕ−k L ρ )
`(γk )
γk
γk
i
, ϕk Lρ + i
, ϕ−k L ρ
`(γk )
`(γk )
γk
γk
k
−k k
k
−k −k
α i
, α ϕ Lρ + α i
, α ϕ Lρ
`(γk )
`(γk )
γk
is 1 for all k, they lie in a compact set and hence
`(γk )
there exist µ ∈ Curr(S) such that (up to passing to a subsequence)
γk
lim
µ.
k→∞ `(γk )
Since the length of
34
V. ERLANDSSON AND C. UYANIK
On the other hand, Theorem 5.5 implies that, for some c0 , c 1 > 0
lim α−k ϕ k L ρ c0 λ + and lim α−k ϕ−k L ρ c1 λ − .
k→∞
k→∞
Therefore, as k → ∞,
γk
γk
−k k
−k −k
i
, α ϕ L ρ → c0 i(µ, λ+ ) and i
, α ϕ L ρ → c1 i(µ, λ− ).
`(γk )
`(γk )
Since {λ + , λ− } is a filling pair of currents, at least one of the quantities
i(µ, λ+ ) or i(µ, λ− ) must be positive. Hence, since α k → ∞ as k → ∞, we
have
i(γk , ϕ k L ρ ) + i(γk , ϕ−k L ρ )
→ ∞.
`(γk )
In particular, there exists M > 0 such that (5.1) holds for all k ≥ 2.
References
[ABEM12] Jayadev Athreya, Alexander Bufetov, Alex Eskin, and Maryam Mirzakhani.
Lattice point asymptotics and volume growth on Teichmüller space. Duke Math.
J., 161(6):1055–1111, 2012.
[AL]
J Aramayona and C Leininger. Hyperbolic structures on surfaces and geodesic
currents, to appear in algorithms and geometric topics around automorphisms
of free groups, advanced courses crm.
[Bil99]
Patrick Billingsley. Convergence of probability measures. Wiley Series in Probability
and Statistics: Probability and Statistics. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York,
second edition, 1999. A Wiley-Interscience Publication.
[BL18]
Anja Bankovic and Christopher J. Leininger. Marked-length-spectral rigidity for
flat metrics. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 370(3):1867–1884, 2018.
[Bon86]
Francis Bonahon. Bouts des variétés hyperboliques de dimension 3. Ann. of Math.
(2), 124(1):71–158, 1986.
[Bon88]
Francis Bonahon. The geometry of Teichmüller space via geodesic currents.
Invent. Math., 92(1):139–162, 1988.
[Bon91]
Francis Bonahon. Geodesic currents on negatively curved groups. In Arboreal
group theory (Berkeley, CA, 1988), volume 19 of Math. Sci. Res. Inst. Publ., pages
143–168. Springer, New York, 1991.
[CB88]
Andrew J. Casson and Steven A. Bleiler. Automorphisms of surfaces after Nielsen
and Thurston, volume 9 of London Mathematical Society Student Texts. Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge, 1988.
[Con18]
David Constantine. Marked length spectrum rigidity in nonpositive curvature
with singularities. to appear in Indiana University Mathematics Journal, 2018.
[DLR10] Moon Duchin, Christopher J. Leininger, and Kasra Rafi. Length spectra and
degeneration of flat metrics. Invent. Math., 182(2):231–277, 2010.
[EPS16]
Viveka Erlandsson, Hugo Parlier, and Juan Souto. Counting curves, and the
stable length of currents. to appear in JEMS, arxiv:1612.05980, 2016.
[Erl16]
Viveka Erlandsson. A remark on the word length in surface groups. to appear
TAMS, arXiv:1608.07436, 2016.
LENGTH FUNCTIONS AND APPLICATIONS TO DYNAMICS AND COUNTING
[ES16]
[FLP12]
[Gen17]
[Glo17]
[HP97]
[Iva92]
[KB02]
[KN13]
[LM08]
[Mag17]
[Mas85]
[Mir08]
[Mir16]
[MZ16]
[Ota90]
[PH92]
[RS17]
[Sas17]
[Thu80]
[Thu88]
[Uya15]
35
Viveka Erlandsson and Juan Souto. Counting curves in hyperbolic surfaces.
Geom. Funct. Anal., 26(3):729–777, 2016.
Albert Fathi, François Laudenbach, and Valentin Poénaru. Thurston’s work on
surfaces, volume 48 of Mathematical Notes. Princeton University Press, Princeton,
NJ, 2012. Translated from the 1979 French original by Djun M. Kim and Dan
Margalit.
Matthieu Gendulphe. What’s wrong with the growth of simple closed geodesics
on nonorientable hyperbolic surfaces. arXiv:1706.08798, 2017.
Olivier Glorieux. Critical exponent for geodesic currents. arXiv:1704.06541, 2017.
Sa’ar Hersonsky and Frédéric Paulin. On the rigidity of discrete isometry groups
of negatively curved spaces. Comment. Math. Helv., 72(3):349–388, 1997.
Nikolai V. Ivanov. Subgroups of Teichmüller modular groups, volume 115 of Translations of Mathematical Monographs. American Mathematical Society, Providence,
RI, 1992. Translated from the Russian by E. J. F. Primrose and revised by the
author.
Ilya Kapovich and Nadia Benakli. Boundaries of hyperbolic groups. In Combinatorial and geometric group theory (New York, 2000/Hoboken, NJ, 2001), volume 296
of Contemp. Math., pages 39–93. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2002.
Ilya Kapovich and Tatiana Nagnibeda. Subset currents on free groups. Geometriae Dedicata, 166(1):307–348, 2013.
Elon Lindenstrauss and Maryam Mirzakhani. Ergodic theory of the space of
measured laminations. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN, (4):Art. ID rnm126, 49, 2008.
Michael Magee. Counting one sided simple closed geodesics on fuchsian thrice
punctured projective planes. arXiv:1705.09377, 2017.
Howard Masur. Ergodic actions of the mapping class group. Proceedings of the
American Mathematical Society, 94(3):455–459, 1985.
Maryam Mirzakhani. Growth of the number of simple closed geodesics on
hyperbolic surfaces. Ann. of Math. (2), 168(1):97–125, 2008.
Maryam Mirzakhani. Counting mapping class group orbits on hyperbolic surfaces. arXiv:1601.03342, 2016.
Giuseppe Martone and Tengren Zhang. Positively ratioed representations.
arXiv:1609.01245, 2016.
Jean-Pierre Otal. Le spectre marqué des longueurs des surfaces à courbure
négative. Ann. of Math. (2), 131(1):151–162, 1990.
Robert C Penner and John L Harer. Combinatorics of train tracks. Annals of
Mathematics Studies, (125):3–114, 1992.
Kasra Rafi and Juan Souto. Geodesics currents and counting problems.
arXiv:1709.06834, 2017.
Dounnu Sasaki. Subset currents on surfaces. arXiv:1703.05739, 2017.
William P. Thurston. The geometry and topology of 3-manifolds. Unpublished
notes, 1980.
William P. Thurston. On the geometry and dynamics of diffeomorphisms of
surfaces. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.), 19(2):417–431, 1988.
Caglar Uyanik. Generalized north-south dynamics on the space of geodesic
currents. Geom. Dedicata, 177:129–148, 2015.
36
V. ERLANDSSON AND C. UYANIK
School of Mathematics, University of Bristol, Howard House, Queen’s Avenue, Bristol
BS8 1Sn, UK
E-mail address: [email protected]
Department of Mathematics, Vanderbilt University, 1326 Stevenson Center, Nashville,
TN 37240, USA
E-mail address: [email protected]
| 4math.GR
|
Under consideration for publication in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming
1
On the interaction between sharing and linearity
arXiv:0710.0528v2 [cs.PL] 28 Jul 2009
GIANLUCA AMATO and FRANCESCA SCOZZARI
Dipartimento di Science, Università “G. d’Annunzio” di Chieti-Pescara, Pescara, Italy.
(e-mail: [email protected], [email protected])
submitted 26 March 2008; revised 3 July 2008, 15 July 2009; accepted 27 July 2009
Abstract
In the analysis of logic programs, abstract domains for detecting sharing and linearity
information are widely used. Devising abstract unification algorithms for such domains
has proved to be rather hard. At the moment, the available algorithms are correct but not
optimal, i.e., they cannot fully exploit the information conveyed by the abstract domains.
In this paper, we define a new (infinite) domain ShLinω which can be thought of as a
general framework from which other domains can be easily derived by abstraction. ShLinω
makes the interaction between sharing and linearity explicit. We provide a constructive
characterization of the optimal abstract unification operator on ShLinω and we lift it to
two well-known abstractions of ShLinω . Namely, to the classical Sharing × Lin abstract
domain and to the more precise ShLin2 abstract domain by Andy King. In the case of
single binding substitutions, we obtain optimal abstract unification algorithms for such
domains.
KEYWORDS: Static analysis, abstract interpretation, sharing, linearity, unification.
1 Introduction
In the analysis of logic programs, the theory of abstract interpretation (Cousot
and Cousot 1979; Cousot and Cousot 1992a) has been widely used to design new
analyses and to improve existing ones. Given a concrete semantics working over a
concrete domain, an abstract interpretation formalizes an analysis by providing an
abstract domain and an abstract semantics (working on the abstract domain), and
relating them to their concrete counterparts. An abstract domain is a collection of
abstract objects which encode the property to analyze. The concrete and abstract
domains are related by means of abstraction and concretization maps, which allow
each concrete object to be abstracted into an abstract object which describes it.
The abstract semantics, in most cases, is given by a set of abstract operators on
the abstract domain, which are the counterparts of the concrete ones. For example, in the case of logic programs, one can individuate in the concrete semantics
the main operations (unification, projection, union), and an abstract semantics can
be specified by giving the abstract unification, abstract projection and abstract
union operations. The theory of abstract interpretation assures us that, for any
concrete operator, there exists a best abstract operator, called the optimal operator. It computes the most precise result among all possible correct operators, on a
2
G. Amato and F. Scozzari
given abstract domain. Designing the optimal abstract counterpart of each concrete
operator is often a very difficult task. In fact, even if the definition of the optimal
operator for any abstract domain is known from the theory of abstract interpretation (as a composition of the concrete operator and the abstraction map), the
hard task is to provide an explicit definition of the abstract operators and to devise
algorithms on the abstract domain which compute them.
1.0.1 The context
The property of sharing has been the subject of many papers (Jacobs and Langen
1992; Hans and Winkler 1992; Muthukumar and Hermenegildo 1992; Codish et al.
1999; Bagnara et al. 2002), from the both theoretical and practical point of view.
Typical applications of sharing analysis are in the fields of optimization of unification (Søndergaard 1986) and parallelization of logic programs (Hermenegildo and
Rossi 1995). The goal of (set) sharing analysis is to detect sets of variables which
share a common variable in the answer substitutions. For instance, consider the
substitution {x/f (u, v), y/g(u, u, u), z/v}. We say that x and y share the variable
u, while x and z share the variable v, and no single variable is shared by x, y and
z. Many domains concerning sharing properties also consider linearity in order to
improve the precision of the analysis. We say that a term is linear if it does not contain multiple occurrences of the same variable. For instance, the term f (x, f (y, z))
is linear, while f (x, f (y, x)) is not, since x occurs twice.
1.0.2 The problem
It is now widely recognized that the original domain proposed for sharing analysis, namely, Sharing (Langen 1990; Jacobs and Langen 1992), is not very precise,
so that it is often combined with other domains for handling freeness, linearity,
groundness or structural information (see Bagnara et al. 2005 for a comparative
evaluation). In particular, adding some kind of linearity information seems to be
very profitable, both for the gain in precision and speed which can be obtained, and
for the fact that it can be easily and elegantly embedded inside the sharing groups
(see King 1994). In the literature, many authors have proposed abstract unification operators (e.g. Codish et al. 1991; Hans and Winkler 1992; Muthukumar and
Hermenegildo 1992; King 1994) for domains of sharing properties, encoding different amounts of linearity information. However, optimal operators for combined
analysis of sharing and linearity have never been devised, neither for the domain
ShLin2 (King 1994), nor for the more broadly adopted Sharing × Lin (Hans and
Winkler 1992; Muthukumar and Hermenegildo 1992).
With the lack of optimal operators, the analysis loses precision and might even
be slower. The latter is typical of sharing analysis, where abstract domains are
usually defined in such a way that, the less information we have, the more complex
the abstract objects are. This is not the case for other kinds of analyses, such as
groundness analysis, where the complexity of abstract objects may grow accordingly
to the amount of groundness information they encode.
On the interaction between sharing and linearity
3
The lack of optimal operators is due to the fact that the role played by linearity
in the unification process has never been fully clarified. The traditional domains
which combine sharing and linearity information are too abstract to capture in a
clean way the effect of repeated occurrences of a variable in a term and most of the
effects of (non-)linearity are obscured by the abstraction process.
1.0.3 The solution
We propose an abstract domain ShLinω which is able to encode the amount of nonlinearity, i.e., which keeps track of the exact number of occurrences of the same variable in a term. Consider again the substitution θ = {x/f (u, v), y/g(u, u, u), z/v}.
Intuitively, to each variable w in the range of the substitution, we associate the
multiset of domain variables which are bound to a term where w occurs, and call
it an ω-sharing group. For instance, we associate, to the variable u, the ω-sharing
group {x, y, y, y}, to denote that u appears once in θ(x) and three times in θ(y). To
the variable v, we associate the ω-sharing group {x, z}, to denote that v appears
once in θ(x) and once in θ(z). Then we consider the collection of all the multisets
so obtained {{x, y, y, y}, {x, z}}, which describes both the sharing property and
the exact amount of non-linearity in the given substitution. The domain we obtain
is conceptually simple, but cannot be directly used for static analysis, without a
widening operator (Cousot and Cousot 1992c), since it contains infinite ascending
chains. However, in this domain the role played by (non-)linearity is manifest, and
we can provide a constructive characterization of the optimal abstract unification
operator. The cornerstone of the abstract unification is the concept of sharing graph
which plays the same role as alternating paths (Søndergaard 1986; King 2000) for
pair-sharing analysis. We use sharing graphs to combine different ω-sharing groups
during unification. The use of sharing graphs offers a new perspective for looking
at variables in the process of unification, and simplifies the proofs of correctness
and optimality of the abstract operators.
We prove that sharing graphs yield an optimal abstract unification operator for
single binding substitutions. We also provide a purely algebraic characterization
of the unification process, which should help in implementing the domain through
widening operators and in devising abstract operators for further abstractions of
ShLinω .
1.0.4 The applications
We consider two well-known domains for sharing properties, namely, the reduced
product (Cousot and Cousot 1979) Sharing × Lin and the more precise domain
ShLin2 by Andy King, and show that they can be immediately obtained as abstractions of ShLinω . By exploiting the unification operator on ShLinω , we provide the
optimal abstract unification operators, in the case of single binding substitutions,
for both domains. We show that we gain in precision w.r.t. any previous attempt
to design an abstract unification operator on these domains. This is the first time
4
G. Amato and F. Scozzari
that abstract unification has been provided optimal for a domain including sharing
and linearity information.
Surprisingly, the optimal abstract operators are able to improve not only aliasing
and linearity information, but also groundness. We show that, in certain cases, we
improve over Pos (Armstrong et al. 1994). This is mainly due to the fact that our
operators exploits the occur-check condition. As far as we know, there is no abstract
unification operator in the literature, for a domain dealing with sharing, freeness
and linearity, which is more precise than Def for groundness.
Unification for multi-binding substitutions is usually computed by considering
one binding at a time. For instance, the unification of a substitution θ with {x1 /t1 ,
x2 /t2 , . . . , xn /tn } is performed by first computing the unification of θ with {x1 /t1 },
and then unifying the result with {x2 /t2 , . . . , xn /tn }. Actually, computing abstract
unification one binding at a time is optimal in ShLinω (Amato and Scozzari 2005).
We show that this is not the case for ShLin2 and Sharing × Lin. This means that
the classical schema of computing unification iteratively on the number of bindings
cannot be used when looking for optimality with multi-binding substitutions, at
least with these two domains.
1.0.5 Structure of the article
In Section 2 we recall some basic notions and the notations about substitutions,
multisets and abstract interpretation. In Section 3 we briefly recall the domain of
existential substitutions and its operators, which will be used throughout the article.
In Section 4 we define the domain ShLinω , together with the unification operator,
we show the optimality result and give an alternative algebraic characterization of
the unification operator. In Section 5 we exploit our results to devise the optimal
unification operators for ShLin2 and Sharing × Lin, in the case of single binding
substitutions. Section 6 gives some evidence that there are practical advantages in
using the optimal unification operators for ShLin2 and Sharing × Lin. In Section
7 we compare our domains and operators with those known in the literature. We
conclude with some open questions for future work. The proofs of the main results
of the paper are in Appendix A, and the proofs of the results in Section 5 are in
Appendix B.
The paper is a substantial expansion of (Amato and Scozzari 2003), which introduces preliminary results of optimality for domains involving sharing and linearity
properties.
2 Notation
Given a set A, let ℘(A) be the powerset of A and ℘f (A) be the set of finite subsets
of A. Given two posets (A, ≤A ) and (B, ≤B ), we denote by A → B the poset of
monotonic functions from A to B ordered pointwise. We use ≤A→B to denote the
order relation over A → B. When an order for A or B is not specified, we assume
the least informative order (x ≤ y ⇐⇒ x = y). We also use A ⊎ B to denote
disjoint union and |A| for the cardinality of the set A.
On the interaction between sharing and linearity
5
2.1 Terms and substitutions
In the following, we fix a first order signature and a denumerable set of variables V.
Given a term or other syntactic object o, we denote by vars(o) the set of variables
occurring in o and by occ(v, o) the number of occurrences of v in o. When it does
not cause ambiguities, we abuse the notation and prefer to use o itself in the place
of vars(o). For example, if t is a term and x ∈ V, then x ∈ t should be read as
x ∈ vars(t).
We denote by ǫ the empty substitution, by {x1 /t1 , . . . , xn /tn } a substitution
θ with θ(xi ) = ti 6= xi , by dom(θ) = {x ∈ V | θ(x) 6= x} and rng(θ) =
∪x∈dom(θ) vars(θ(x)) the domain and range of θ respectively. Let vars(θ) be the
set dom(θ) ∪ rng(θ) and, given U ∈ ℘f (V), let θ|U be the projection of θ over U ,
i.e., the unique substitution such that θ|U (x) = θ(x) if x ∈ U and θ|U (x) = x
otherwise. Given θ1 and θ2 two substitutions with disjoint domains, we denote by
θ1 ⊎ θ2 the substitution θ such that dom(θ) = dom(θ1 ) ∪ dom(θ2 ) and θ(x) = θi (x)
if x ∈ dom(θi ), for each i ∈ {1, 2}. The application of a substitution θ to a term t is
written as tθ or θ(t). Given two substitutions θ and δ, their composition, denoted
by θ ◦ δ, is given by (θ ◦ δ)(x) = θ(δ(x)). A substitution θ is idempotent when
θ ◦ θ = θ or, equivalently, when dom(θ) ∩ rng(θ) = ∅. A substitution ρ is called
renaming if it is a bijection from V to V (this is equivalent to saying that there
exists a substitution ρ−1 such that ρ ◦ ρ−1 = ρ−1 ◦ ρ = ǫ). Instantiation induces
a preorder on substitutions: θ is more general than δ, denoted by δ ≤ θ, if there
exists σ such that σ ◦ θ = δ. If ≈ is the equivalence relation induced by ≤, we
say that σ and θ are equal up to renaming when σ ≈ θ. The sets of substitutions,
idempotent substitutions and renamings are denoted by Subst, ISubst and Ren respectively. Given a set of equations E, we write σ = mgu(E) to denote that σ is a
most general unifier of E. Any idempotent substitution σ is a most general unifier
of the corresponding set of equations Eq(σ) = {x = σ(x) | x ∈ dom(σ)}. In the following, we will abuse the notation and denote by mgu(σ1 , . . . , σn ) the substitution
mgu(Eq(σ1 ) ∪ . . . ∪ Eq(σn )), when it exists. In spite of a single binding substitution
{x/t} we often use just the binding x/t. In the rest of the paper we assume that a
binding x/t is idempotent, namely,that x ∈
/ vars(t).
A position is a sequence of positive natural numbers. We denote with Ξ the set
of all positions and with N+ the set of all positive natural numbers. Given a term
t and a position ξ, we define t(ξ) inductively as follows:
t(ǫ) = t
(
t(i · ξ ′ ) =
(where ǫ denotes the empty sequence)
ti (ξ ′ )
if t ≡ f (t1 , . . . , tn ) and i ≤ n;
undefined otherwise.
For any variable x, an occurrence of x in t is a position ξ such that t(ξ) = x.
In the rest of the paper, we use: U , V , W to denote finite sets of variables;
h, k, u, v, w, x, y, z for variables; t for terms; f, r, s for term symbols; a, b for constants; η, θ, σ, δ for substitutions; ρ for renamings.
6
G. Amato and F. Scozzari
2.2 Multisets
A multiset is a set where repetitions are allowed. We denote by {{x1 , . . . , xm }} a
multiset, where x1 , . . . , xm is a sequence with (possible) repetitions. We denote by
{{}} the empty multiset. We will often use the polynomial notation v1i1 . . . vnin , where
v1 , . . . , vn is a sequence without repetitions, to denote a multiset A whose element
vj appears ij times. The set {vj | ij > 0} is called the support of A and is denoted
by TAU. We also use the functional notation A : {v1 , . . . , vn } → N, where A(vj ) = ij .
In this paper, we only consider multisets whose support is finite. We denote with
℘m (X) the set of all the multisets whose support is any finite subset of X. For
example, both a2 c4 and a1 b2 c3 are elements of ℘m ({a, b, c}). The cardinality of a
P
multiset is |A| = v∈TAU A(v).
The new fundamental operation for multisets is the sum, defined as
A ⊎ B = λv ∈ TAU ∪ TBU.A(v) + B(v) .
Multiset sum is associative, commutative and {{}} is the neutral element. Note that
we also use ⊎ to denote disjoint union for standard sets. The context will allow us
to identify the proper semantics of ⊎.
Given a multiset A and X ⊆ TAU, the restriction of A over X, denoted by A|X ,
is the only multiset B such that TBU = X and B(v) = A(v) for each v ∈ X. Finally,
if A ∈ ℘m (X), E[x] is an integer expression and x ∈ X, we define
X
X
A(x) · E[x] .
E[x] =
x∈A
x∈TAU
For example, given a multiset A = {{5, 5, 6, 8, 8, 8}} then
3 ∗ 82 = 278.
P
2
x∈A x
= 2 ∗ 52 + 62 +
2.3 Abstract interpretation
Given two sets C and A of concrete and abstract objects respectively, an abstract
interpretation (Cousot and Cousot 1992b) is given by an approximation relation
3 ⊆ A × C. When a 3 c holds, this means that a is a correct abstraction of c. In
particular, we are interested in the case when (A, ≤A ) is a poset and a ≤A a′ means
that a is more precise than a′ . In this case we require that, if a 3 c and a ≤A a′ ,
then a′ 3 c, too. In more detail, we require what Cousot and Cousot (1992b) call the
existence of a best abstract approximation assumption, i.e., the existence of a map
α : C → A such that for all a ∈ A, c ∈ C, it holds that a 3 c ⇐⇒ α(c) ≤A a. The
map α is called the abstraction function and maps each c to its best approximation
in A.
Given a (possibly partial) function f : C → C, we say that f˜ : A → A is a correct
abstraction of f , and write f˜ 3 f , whenever
a 3 c ⇒ f˜(a) 3 f (c) ,
assuming that f˜(a) 3 f (c) is true whenever f (c) is not defined. We say that f˜ :
A → A is the optimal abstraction of f when it is the best correct approximation of
On the interaction between sharing and linearity
7
f , i.e., when f˜ 3 f and
∀f ′ : A → A. f ′ 3 f ⇒ f˜ ≤A→A f ′ .
In some cases, we prefer to deal with a stronger framework, in which the domain
C is also endowed with a partial order ≤C and α : C → A is a left adjoint to
γ : A → C, i.e.,
∀c ∈ C.∀a ∈ A.α(c) ≤A a ⇐⇒ c ≤C γ(a) .
The pair hα, γi is called a Galois connection. In particular, we will only consider
the case of Galois insertions, which are Galois connections such that α ◦ γ is the
identity map. If hα, γi is a Galois insertion and f : C → C is a monotone map, the
optimal abstraction f˜ always exists and it is definable as f˜ = α ◦ f ◦ γ.
3 The domain of existential substitutions
The choice of the concrete domain depends on the observable properties we want
to analyze. Most of the semantics suited for the analysis of logic programs are
based on computed answer substitutions, and most of the domains are expressed
as abstractions of sets of substitutions. In general, we are not really interested
in the substitutions, but in their quotient-set w.r.t. an appropriate equivalence
relation. Let us consider a one-clause program p(x, x), the goal p(x, y), and the
following answer substitutions: θ1 = {y/x}, θ2 = {x/y}, θ3 = {x/u, y/u} and
θ4 = {x/v, y/v}. Although θ1 and θ2 are equal up to renaming, the same does
not hold for θ3 and θ4 . Nonetheless, they essentially represent the same answer,
since u and v are just two different variables we chose when renaming apart the
clause p(x, x) from the goal p(x, y), and therefore are not relevant to the user.
On the other hand, if θ3 and θ4 are answer substitutions for the goal q(x, y, u),
then they correspond to computed answers q(u, u, u) and q(v, v, u) and therefore
are fundamentally different. As a consequence, the equivalence relation we need
to consider must be coarser then renaming, and must take into account the set
of variables of interest, i.e., the set of variables which appear in the goal. For
these reasons, we think that the best solution is to use a domain of equivalence
classes of substitutions. Among the various domains proposed in the literature (e.g.
Jacobs and Langen 1992; Marriott et al. 1994; Levi and Spoto 2003), we adopt the
domain of existential substitutions (Amato and Scozzari 2009), since it is explicitly
defined as a quotient of a set of substitutions, w.r.t. a suitable equivalence relation.
Moreover, the domain is equipped with all the necessary operators for defining a
denotational semantics, namely, projection, renaming and unification. We briefly
recall the basic definitions of the domain and the unification operator.
Given θ1 , θ2 ∈ Subst and U ∈ ℘f (V), the preorder U is defined as follows:
θ1 U θ2 ⇐⇒ ∃δ ∈ Subst.∀x ∈ U. θ1 (x) = δ(θ2 (x)) .
The notation θ1 U θ2 states that θ1 is an instance of θ2 w.r.t. the variables in
U . The equivalence relation induced by the preorder U is given by:
θ1 ∼U θ2 ⇐⇒ ∃ρ ∈ Ren.∀x ∈ U. θ1 (x) = ρ(θ2 (x)) .
8
G. Amato and F. Scozzari
This relation precisely captures the extended notion of renaming which is needed
to work with computed answer substitutions.
Example 3.1
It is easy to check that {x/w, y/u} ∼{x,y} ǫ by choosing the renaming ρ = {x/w,
w/x, y/u, u/y}. Note that ∼U is coarser than the standard equivalence relation ≈:
there is no renaming ρ such that ǫ = ρ ◦ {x/w, y/u}. As it happens for , if we
enlarge the set of variables of interest, not all equivalences between substitutions
are preserved: for instance, {x/w, y/u} 6∼{w,x,y} ǫ.
Let ISubst ∼U be the quotient set of ISubst w.r.t. ∼U . The domain ISubst ∼ of
existential substitutions is defined as the disjoint union of all the ISubst ∼U for
U ∈ ℘f (V), namely:
]
ISubst ∼U .
ISubst ∼ =
U∈℘f (V)
In the following we write [θ]U for the equivalence class of θ w.r.t. ∼U . The partial
order over ISubst ∼ is given by:
[θ]U [θ′ ]V ⇐⇒ U ⊇ V ∧ θ V θ′ .
Intuitively, [θ]U [θ′ ]V means that θ is an instance of θ′ w.r.t. the variables in V ,
provided that they are all variables of interest of θ.
To ease notation, we often omit braces from the sets of variables of interest when
they are given extensionally. So we write [θ]x,y instead of [θ]{x,y} and ∼x,y,z instead
of ∼{x,y,z}. When the set of variables of interest is clear from the context or when
it is not relevant, it will be omitted. Finally, we omit the braces which enclose the
bindings of a substitution when the latter occurs inside an equivalence class, i.e.,
we write [x/y]U instead of [{x/y}]U .
3.0.1 Unification
Given U, V ∈ ℘f (V), [θ1 ]U , [θ2 ]V ∈ ISubst ∼ , the most general unifier between these
two classes is defined as the mgu of suitably chosen representatives, where variables
not of interest are renamed apart. In formulas:
mgu([θ1 ]U , [θ2 ]V ) = [mgu(θ1′ , θ2′ )]U∪V ,
(1)
where θ1 ∼U θ1′ ∈ ISubst, θ2 ∼V θ2′ ∈ ISubst and (U ∪ vars(θ1′ )) ∩ (V ∪ vars(θ2′ )) ⊆
U ∩ V . The last condition is needed to avoid variable clashes between the chosen
representatives θ1′ and θ2′ . Moreover, mgu is the greatest lower bound of ISubst ∼
ordered by .
Example 3.2
Let θ1 = {x/a, y/r(v1 , v1 , v2 )} and θ2 = {y/r(a, v2 , v1 ), z/b}. Then
mgu([θ1 ]x,y , [θ2 ]y,z ) = [x/a, y/r(a, a, v), z/b]x,y,z ,
by choosing θ1′ = θ1 and θ2′ = {y/r(a, w, v), z/b}. In this case we have
9
On the interaction between sharing and linearity
{x/a, y/r(a, a, v), z/b} ∼x,y,z
mgu(θ1′ , θ2′ ) = {x/a, y/r(a, a, v), z/b, v1/a, w/a, v2 /v} .
A different version of unification is obtained when one of the two arguments is
an existential substitution, and the other one is a standard substitution. In this
case, the latter argument may be viewed as an existential substitution where all
the variables are of interest:
mgu([θ]U , δ) = mgu([θ]U , [δ]vars(δ) ) .
(2)
Note that deriving the general unification in (1) from the special case in (2) is not
possible. This is because there are elements in ISubst ∼ which cannot be obtained
as [δ]vars(δ) for any δ ∈ ISubst (see Example 4.10).
This is the form of unification which is better suited for analysis of logic programs, where existential substitutions are the denotations of programs while standard substitutions are the result of unification between goals and heads of clauses.
Therefore, the rest of the paper will be concerned with the problem of devising optimal abstract operators corresponding to (2), for three different abstract domains.
Of course, unification is not the only operator needed to give semantics to logic
programs: we also need projection, renaming and union. However, providing optimal abstract counterparts for these operators is generally a trivial task, and will
not be considered here.
We want to conclude the section with a small remark about our choice of the concrete domain. By adopting existential substitutions and the corresponding notion of
unification, we greatly simplify all the semantic definitions which are heavily based
on renaming variables apart. This is because all the details concerning renamings
are shifted towards the inner level of the semantic domain, where they are more
easily managed (Jacobs and Langen 1992; Amato and Scozzari 2009).
4 The abstract domain ShLinω
The domain Sharing × Lin is one of the best known domains in the literature
which combine sharing and linearity information. The domain Sharing records the
information of variable aliasing, by abstracting the substitution θ = {x/f (u, v),
y/g(u, u, u), z/v} into the set {uxy, vxz}. The object uxy, called a sharing group,
states that θ(u), θ(x) and θ(y) do share some variable (the variable u in this case).
Analogously, the sharing group vxz states that θ(v), θ(x) and θ(z) do share (in this
case the variable v). One of the simplest way of adding linearity information is to
record, in a separate object, the set of variables w such that θ(w) is a linear term. In
our example, only θ(y) is not linear. Thus the substitution is abstracted into the pair
({uxy, vxz}, {u, v, x, z}). Another known domain in the literature is ASub whose
main difference w.r.t. Sharing × Lin is that it only records sharing information
between pairs of variables. Thus, in ASub, each sharing group has at most two
elements. Developing optimal unification operators for such abstract domains is a
difficult task. In our opinion, this is because the gap between the substitutions and
10
G. Amato and F. Scozzari
Sharing×Lin (or ASub) is too wide and the combined effect of aliasing and linearity
is difficult to grasp.
We solve this problem by defining a new abstract domain ShLinω which can be
used to approximate ISubst ∼ . Since ShLinω has infinite ascending chains, in most
cases it cannot be directly used for the analysis. It should be thought of as a general
framework from which other domains can be easily derived by abstraction. In this
sense, ShLinω closes the gap between the concrete domain of substitutions and
the abstractions like Sharing × Lin or ASub. The structure of ShLinω has made it
possible to develop clean and optimal abstract unification operators. From these,
optimal operators for the simpler domains are easy to obtain, at least for single
binding substitutions.
The idea underlying ShLinω is to count the exact number of occurrences of the
same variable in a term. It extends the standard domain Sharing by recording, for
each v ∈ V and θ ∈ ISubst, not only the set {w ∈ V | v ∈ θ(w)} but the multiset
λw ∈ V.occ(v, θ(w)).
Definition 4.1 (ω-Sharing Group)
An ω-sharing group is a multiset of variables, i.e., an element of ℘m (V).
Example 4.2
Given variables u, v, w, x, y ∈ V, examples of ω-sharing groups are u2 v 3 x19 , xyz
and u23 vwx2 y 3 .
Definition 4.3
Given a substitution θ and a variable v ∈ V, we define
θ−1 (v) = λw. occ(v, θ(w)) .
Intuitively, θ−1 (v) is an ω-sharing group which maps each variable w to the number
of occurrences of v in θ(w).
Example 4.4
Given θ = {x/f (u, u, u), y/g(u, v), z/f (u, v, v)}, we have that θ−1 (u) = ux3 yz,
θ−1 (v) = vyz 2 , θ−1 (w) = w, and θ−1 (x) = {{}}.
Definition 4.5 (Correct Approximation)
Given a set of variables U and a set of ω-sharing groups S (i.e., S ⊆ ℘m (U )), we
say that the pair (S, U ) correctly approximates a substitution [θ]W if U = W and
for each v ∈ V, θ−1 (v)|W ∈ S. In the following we denote by [S]U the pair (S, U )
and write [S]U 3 [θ]W to mean that [S]U correctly approximates [θ]W .
Therefore, [S]U correctly approximates [θ]U when S contains at least all the ωsharing groups which may arise in θ, restricted to the variables U . Note that [θ]U
is an equivalence class of substitutions, as defined in Section 3, while [S]U is just a
symbol to denote the pair of objects (S, U ). We prefer this notation for the sake of
uniformity with substitutions.
On the interaction between sharing and linearity
11
Theorem 4.6
The relation 3 is well defined.
We can now define the domain ShLinω of ω-sharing groups.
Definition 4.7 (ShLinω )
The domain ShLinω is defined as
ShLinω = {[S]U | U ∈ ℘f (V), S ⊆ ℘m (U ), S 6= ∅ ⇒ {{}} ∈ S} ,
and ordered by [S1 ]U1 ≤ω [S2 ]U2 iff U1 = U2 and S1 ⊆ S2 .
The order relation corresponds to the approximation ordering, since bigger (w.r.t
≤ω ) elements correctly approximate a larger number of substitutions than smaller
elements. The existence of the empty multiset, when S is not empty, is required
in order to obtain a Galois insertion, instead of a Galois connection. In order to
simplify the notation, in the following we write an object [{{{}}, B1 , . . . , Bn }]U ∈
ShLinω as [B1 , . . . , Bn ]U by omitting the braces and the empty multiset. Moreover,
if X ∈ ShLinω , we write B ∈ X in place of X = [S]U ∧ B ∈ S.
Definition 4.8 (Abstraction for ShLinω )
We define the abstraction for a substitution [θ]U as
αω ([θ]U ) = [{θ−1 (v)|U | v ∈ V}]U .
This is the least element of ShLinω which correctly approximates [θ]U . Note that
by the proof of Theorem 4.6 it immediately follows that αω is well defined, i.e., it
does not depend from the choice of the representative for [θ]U .
Example 4.9
Given θ = {x/r(y, u, u), z/y, v/u} and U = {w, x, y, z}, we have θ−1 (u) = x2 vu,
θ−1 (y) = xyz, θ−1 (z) = θ−1 (v) = θ−1 (x) = {{}} and θ−1 (s) = s for all the other
variables (included w). Projecting over U we obtain αω ([θ]U ) = [x2 , xyz, w]U .
Example 4.10
As we have said in Section 3, we show an element of ISubst ∼ , namely the existential
substitution [x/r(v, v)]x , which cannot be obtained as [δ]vars(δ) for any substitution δ. In fact, consider any ω-sharing group B = δ −1 (u)|vars(δ) ∈ αω ([δ]vars(δ) ).
Then either u ∈
/ rng(δ) and B = {{}} or u ∈ rng(δ) and B(u) = 1. However,
α([x/r(v, v)]x ) = [x2 ]x and x2 does not contain any variable with multiplicity one.
4.1 Multigraphs
In order to define an abstract unification operator over ShLinω , we need to introduce
the concept of multigraph. We call (directed) multigraph a graph where multiple
distinguished edges are allowed between nodes. We use the definition of multigraph
which is customary in category theory (Mac Lane 1988).
12
G. Amato and F. Scozzari
Definition 4.11 (Multigraph)
A multigraph G is a tuple hNG , EG , srcG , tgtG i where NG 6= ∅ and EG are the sets
of nodes and edges respectively, srcG : EG → NG is the source function which maps
each edge to its start node, and tgtG : EG → NG is the target function which maps
each edge to its end node.
A labeled multigraph G is a multigraph equipped with a labelling function lG :
NG → LG which maps each node to its label in the given set LG .
We write e : n1 → n2 ∈ G to denote the edge e ∈ EG such that srcG (e) = n1
and tgtG (e) = n2 . We also write n1 → n2 ∈ G to denote any edge e ∈ EG such
that srcG (e) = n1 and tgtG (e) = n2 . Moreover, with |n1 → n2 ∈ G| we denote
the cardinality of the set {e ∈ EG | srcG (e) = n1 ∧ tgtG (e) = n2 }. In the notation
above, we omit “∈ G” whenever the multigraph G is clear from the context.
We call in-degree (respectively out-degree) of a node n the cardinality of the set
{e ∈ EG | tgt(e) = n} (respectively {e ∈ EG | src(e) = n}).
Given a multigraph G, a path π is a non-empty sequence of nodes n1 . . . nk such
that, for each i ∈ {1, . . . , k − 1}, there is either an edge ni → ni+1 ∈ G or an edge
ni+1 → ni ∈ G. Nodes n1 and nk are the endpoints of π, and we say that π connects
n1 and nk . A multigraph is connected when all pairs of nodes are connected by at
least one path.
4.2 Abstract unification
We need to find the abstract counterpart of mgu over ShLinω , i.e., an operation
mguω such that, if [S]U 3 [θ]U , then
mguω ([S]U , δ) 3 mgu([θ]U , δ)
(3)
for each δ ∈ ISubst. Note that we are looking for an abstract counterpart to the
mixed unification in (2), where one of the two arguments is a plain substitution. In
particular, we would like to find an operator which is the minimum element that
satisfies the condition in (3), i.e., the optimal abstract counterpart of mgu. Observe
that, for a fixed U , the set of all the elements [S]U ∈ ShLinω is a complete lattice
w.r.t. ≤ω with the top element given by [℘m (U )]U and the meet operator given by
T
V
i∈I Si U ,
ω {[Si ]U | i ∈ I} =
for any family {[Si ]U | i ∈ I} of elements of ShLinω . Moreover, the relation 3 is
V
meet-preserving on the left, since if [Si ]U 3 [θ]U for each i ∈ I, then ω {[Si ]U | i ∈
I} 3 [θ]U . Therefore, we may define the abstract mgu as follows
^
mguω ([S]U , δ) =
[S ′ ]U ′ | ∀θ.[S]U 3 [θ]U ⇒ [S ′ ]U ′ 3 mgu([θ]U , δ) ,
ω
where the definitions of 3 and mgu force U ′ to be U ∪ vars(δ). Note that this is just
a translation of the general definition of optimal operator in (Cousot and Cousot
1992b) and it satisfies (3).
This definition is completely non-constructive. The rest of this section is devoted
to providing a constructive characterization for mguω ([S]U , δ). We begin to characterize the operation of abstract unification by means of graph theoretic notions.
On the interaction between sharing and linearity
13
Definition 4.12 (Multiplicity of ω-sharing groups)
The multiplicity of an ω-sharing group B in a term t is defined as:
X
X
B(v) · occ(v, t) .
χ(B, t) =
occ(v, t) =
v∈B
v∈TBU
For instance, χ(x3 yz 4 , r(x, y, f (x, y, z))) = 3 · 2 + 1 · 2 + 4 · 1 = 12. The meaning of
the map χ is made clear by the following proposition.
Proposition 4.13
Given a substitution θ, a variable v and a term t, we have that χ(θ−1 (v), t) =
occ(v, θ(t)). Moreover, given a set of variables U , when vars(t) ⊆ U , it holds that
χ(θ−1 (v)|U , t) = occ(v, θ(t)).
Example 4.14
Let B = xy 2 z 3 and θ = {y/r(x, x), z/r(x, x, x)}, so that θ−1 (x) = {xy 2 z 3 }. Given
t ≡ s(x, z) we have
occ(x, θ(t)) = occ(x, s(x, r(x, x, x))) = 4 ,
and
χ(B, t) = B(x)occ(x, t) + B(z)occ(z, t) = 1 · 1 + 3 · 1 = 4 .
If [S]U 3 [θ]U and we unify [θ]U with δ, some of the ω-sharing groups in S may
be glued together to obtain a bigger resultant group. It happens that the gluing of
the sharing groups during the unification of [θ]U with a single binding substitution
{x/t} may be represented by special labelled multigraphs which we call sharing
graphs.
Example 4.15
Let S = {x3 , y} and U = {x, y}. We look for a representation of the unification
process between any substitution θ approximated by S and the binding x/r(y). We
show that multigraphs can be easily used for this purpose. For instance, the substitution θ = {x/r(g(u, u, u))} is approximated by S. By unifying θ with {x/r(y)}
we obtain δ = {x/r(g(u, u, u)), y/g(u, u, u)}. Note that any approximation of δ on
the variables {x, y} must include the sharing group x3 y 3 generated by the variable
u. Thus, any correct approximation of the unification must also contain x3 y 3 .
We want to associate to any ω-sharing group B in δ a special multigraph which
represents the way the ω-sharing groups in S have been merged in order to obtain
B. The nodes of this multigraph are the ω-sharing groups in S (possibly repeated
any number of times). The following is a sharing graph for x/r(y) and S:
☎
✞
1
y
✝
✆
;
0
ww
ww
w
w
ww
☎
☎
✞
✞
0
1
/ y
x3
✝
✆
✝
✆
3GG
0
GG
GG
GG
#
✞
☎
1
y
✝
✆
0
14
G. Amato and F. Scozzari
where pedices and apices on a sharing group B are respectively the values of χ(B, x)
and χ(B, r(y)). For instance, since χ(x3 , x) = 3, then we put the pedice 3 on the
node x3 to mean that x is bound to a term containing 3 occurrences of the same
variable. Symmetrically, since χ(x3 , r(y)) = 0, then we put the apice 0 on the node
x3 . The in-degree and the out-degree of the nodes reflect the values of apices and
pedices. In this case, we have 3 out-going edges from x3 and no in-going edges.
Moreover, the multigraph must be connected, in order to guarantee that we can
use a single variable to form the sharing group x3 y 3 .
By summing the labels of all the nodes, namely, x3 ⊎ y ⊎ y ⊎ y, we obtain the
ω-sharing group x3 y 3 which must appear in any correct approximation of the unification.
Given any labelled multigraph G, in the rest of the paper we assume that the
codomain of the labelling function lG is ℘m (V), the set of ω-sharing groups.
Definition 4.16 (Sharing Graph)
A sharing graph for the binding x/t and a set of ω-sharing groups S is a labelled
multigraph G such that
1. G is connected;
2. for each node n ∈ NG , lG (n) ∈ S;
3. for each node n ∈ NG , the out-degree of n is equal to χ(lG (n), x) and the
in-degree of n is equal to χ(lG (n), t).
The resultant ω-sharing group of G is
res(G) =
]
lG (n) .
n∈NG
Example 4.17
Let S = {ux2 , xy, vz, wz, xyz}. The following is a sharing graph for x/r(y, z) and
S:
✞
✞
☎
☎
✞
☎
0
1
1
/
/
2
xy
vz
ux
✝
✆
✝
✆
✝
✆
2GG
0
1
GG
GG
GG
#
✞
☎
☎
✞
1
1
/ wz
xy
✝
✆
✝
✆
0
1
where pedices and apices on a sharing group B are respectively the value of χ(B, x)
and χ(B, r(y, z)). Therefore the resultant sharing group is uvwx4 y 2 z 2 .
It is worth noting that, given any set of ω-sharing groups S and binding x/t,
there exist many different sharing graphs for x/t and S. Each sharing graph yields
a resultant sharing group which must be included in the result of the abstract
unification operator. Of course, different sharing graphs may give the same resultant
sharing group. The abstract unification operator is defined by collecting all the
resultant sharing groups.
On the interaction between sharing and linearity
15
Definition 4.18 (Single binding unification)
Let U ∈ ℘f (V), S be a set of ω-sharing groups with [S]U ∈ ShLinω , x/t be a
binding, and vars(x/t) ⊆ U . The set of resultant ω-sharing groups for x/t and S is
mguω (S, x/t) = {res(G) | G is a sharing graph for S and x/t} .
We lift mguω to an operation over ShLinω .
mguω ([S]U , x/t) = [mgu(S, x/t)]U .
This is a particular case of the abstract unification operator, for single binding
substitutions and vars(x/t) ⊆ U .
Example 4.19
Let S be as in Example 4.17. The following is
S:
✞
☎
0
,✞
2
ux
2 xyz
✝
✆
✝
2
a sharing graph for x/r(y, y, z) and
☎
3
_
✆
1
where pedices and apices on a sharing group B are respectively the value of χ(B, x)
and χ(B, r(y, y, z)). Therefore ux3 yz ∈ mguω (S, x/r(y, y, z)). Note that this sharing
group can actually be generated by the substitution θ = {x/r(v1 , v1 , v2 ), y/v2 , z/v2 ,
u/v1 , v/a, w/a} where a is a ground term. Let U = {u, v, w, x, y, z}. It is the case
that [S]U 3[θ]U and mgu([θ]U , {x/r(y, y, z)}) performs exactly the variable aliasings
depicted by the sharing graph. Actually mgu([θ]U , {x/r(y, y, z)}) = [x/r(v1 , v1 , v1 ),
y/v1 , u/v1 , v/a, w/a]U = [η]U and η −1 (v1 )|U = ux3 yz.
We give here an intuition of the way sharing graphs work. Assume given a set of
ω-sharing groups [S]U and a binding x/t with vars(x/t) ⊆ U . We want to compute
[mguω (S, x/t)]U . To this aim, for any substitution θ approximated by [S]U , that is,
[S]U 3 [θ]U , we compute αω (mgu([θ]U , {x/t})).
For any B1 , B2 ∈ S, assume that there exist v1 , v2 ∈ V such that B1 = θ−1 (v1 )|U
and B2 = θ−1 (v2 )|U . When unifying θ with the binding x/t, we use the fact that
mgu(Eq(θ) ∪ {x = t}) = mgu({θ(x) = θ(t)}) ◦ θ. By Prop. 4.13, θ(x) contains
χ(B1 , x) instances of v1 and χ(B2 , x) instances of v2 . Symmetrically, θ(t) contains
χ(B1 , t) instances of v1 and χ(B2 , t) instances of v2 .
Assume that θ(x) and θ(t) only differ for the variables occurring in them (and
not for the structure of terms). Then, an arrow from the sharing group B1 to B2
represents the fact that, in mgu({θ(x) = θ(t)}), one of the copies of v1 is aliased
to one of the copies of v2 , i.e., that there are corresponding positions in θ(x) and
θ(t) where the two terms contain the variables v1 and v2 respectively. The third
condition for sharing graphs implies that each occurrence of v1 and v2 is aliased
to some other variable. The first condition (the sharing graph must be connected)
ensures that all the variables corresponding to the ω-sharing groups involved in the
sharing graph are aliased to each other. In other words, given any two such variables,
they are aliased. Although here we are only considering the case when θ(x) and θ(t)
differ for the variables occurring in them, we will show that it is enough to reach
correctness and optimality. The next example applies this intuition to a concrete
case.
16
G. Amato and F. Scozzari
Example 4.20
Consider Example 4.19, where θ = {x/r(v1 , v1 , v2 ), y/v2 , z/v2 , u/v1 , v/a, w/a} and
U = {u, v, w, x, y, z}. Let B1 = ux2 and B2 = xyz, thus B1 = θ−1 (v1 )|U and
B2 = θ−1 (v2 )|U . When unifying θ with the binding x/r(y, y, z) we have that θ(x) =
r(v1 , v1 , v2 ) and θ(r(y, y, z)) = r(v2 , v2 , v2 ).
Note that θ(x) contains χ(ux2 , x) = 2 instances of v1 and χ(xyz, x) = 1 instance
of v2 . Symmetrically, θ(r(y, y, z)) contains χ(ux2 , r(y, y, z)) = 0 instances of v1 and
χ(xyz, r(y, y, z)) = 3 instances of v2 . Moreover, θ(x) and θ(r(y, y, z)) only differ
for the variables occurring in them. Thus, the three edges in the sharing graph of
Example 4.19 correspond to the following aliasings:
θ(r(y, y, z))=r(vO2 , vO 2 , vO 2 )
θ(x)
=r(v1 , v1 , v2 )
In particular, the last arrow from v2 to itsself, corresponds to the self-loop in the
sharing graph.
The unification operator mguω ([S]U , x/t) can be extended to the case vars(x/t) *
U . The idea is to enlarge S by including all the singletons in vars(x/t) \ U .
Definition 4.21 (Single binding unification with extension)
Let U ∈ ℘f (V), S be a set of ω-sharing groups with [S]U ∈ ShLinω and x/t be a
binding.
mguω ([S]U , x/t) = mguω ([S ∪ {{{v}} | v ∈ vars(x/t) \ U }]U∪vars(x/t) , x/t) .
Note that, for a generic abstract domain, the method of extending the abstract
object to include all the variables in the concrete substitution δ may result in a
non-optimal abstract unification. For example, this is what happens in the case of
the domain Sharing, as shown in (Amato and Scozzari 2009). However, we will
prove that, in the case of ShLinω , the abstract mgu in Definition 4.21 is optimal.
This operator can be extended to multi-binding substitutions in the obvious way,
namely by iterating the single binding operator.
Definition 4.22 (Multi-binding unification)
We define mguω ([S]U , δ) with δ ∈ ISubst and [S]U ∈ ShLinω by induction on the
number of bindings:
mguω ([S]U , ǫ) = [S]U ,
mguω ([S]U , {x/t} ⊎ δ) = mguω (mguω ([S]U , x/t), δ) .
It is possible to prove that mguω ([S]U , δ) is optimal for multi-binding substitutions
(Amato and Scozzari 2005). Since optimality of iterative multi-binding unification
is not inherited by the abstractions of ShLinω (as we show in Section 5.3), we
will focus on single binding unification. In the rest of the paper, we only consider
bindings x/t which are idempotent, namely, such that x ∈
/ vars(t).
On the interaction between sharing and linearity
17
4.3 Correctness of abstract unification
We now show that mguω ([S]U , δ) is correct w.r.t. concrete unification. We show
correctness for multi-binding substitutions, since it is a trivial extension of the
single binding case. In fact, composition of correct operators is still correct.
First of all, we extend the definition of θ−1 to the case when it is applied to a
sharing group B.
Definition 4.23
Given θ ∈ ISubst and B an ω-sharing group, we define
θ−1 (B) = λv ∈ V.χ(B, θ(v)) .
In order to prove the correctness of abstract unification, we need the following
auxiliary property.
Proposition 4.24
Given substitutions θ, η ∈ ISubst and an ω-sharing group B, we have
(η ◦ θ)−1 (B) = θ−1 (η −1 (B)) .
Theorem 4.25 (Correctness of mguω )
The operation mguω is correct w.r.t. mgu, i.e.,
∀[S]U ∈ ShLinω , δ ∈ ISubst. [S]U 3 [θ]U =⇒ mguω ([S]U , δ) 3 mgu([θ]U , δ) .
Example 4.26
Let θ = {x/r(s(u, u, u), v, w), y/v ′ , z/w′ }, δ = {x/r(y, y, z)} and U = {x, y, z}.
Therefore αω ([θ]U ) = [x3 , x, y, z]U . If we proceed with the concrete unification
of [θ]U with δ, we have mgu([θ]U , δ) = [θ′ ]U with θ′ = mgu(θ, δ) = η ◦ θ and
η = mgu(θ(x) = θ(r(y, y, z))). This gives the following results:
η = {v ′ /s(u, u, u), v/s(u, u, u), w′/w} ,
θ′ = {x/r(s(u, u, u), s(u, u, u), w), y/s(u, u, u), z/w, v ′/s(u, u, u), w′ /w} ,
with [θ′ ]U = [θ]U . Now, let η ′ be obtained from η by replacing each occurrence of a
variable in rng(η) with a different fresh variable, β = η ′ ◦ θ and ρ be a substitution
mapping variables to variables such that ρ(β(x)) = θ′ (x) for each x ∈ U . Note that
ρ is not a renaming, since it is not bijective. We have:
η = {v/s(u1 , u2 , u3 ), v ′ /s(u4 , u5 , u6 ), w′ /u7 } ,
β = {x/r(s(u, u, u), s(u1 , u2 , u3 ), w), y/s(u4 , u5 , u6 ), z/u7 , v ′ /s(u4 , u5 , u6 ), w′ /u7 } ,
ρ = {u1 /u, u2 /u, u3 /u, u4/u, u5 /u, u6 /u, u7/w} .
Following the
✞
x3 (u)
✝
proof, we build a multigraph G as follows:
✞
☎
☎
☎
✞
✞
0
0
0
x(u
)
x(u
)
x(u3 )
1
2
✆
✆
✝
✆
✝
3FSSSS ✝
1
1
FF SxSxSS
x
x
FFxx SSSS
xx
xx
x FF
xx
SSS xxx
x
x
S
F
#
{xx
{xx SSSS
{xx
☎
☎
☎
)✞
✞
✞
✞
2
2
2
y(u4 )
y(u5 )
y(u6 )
z(u7 )
✝
✆
✝
✆
✝
✆
✝
0
0
0
☎
0
☎
✞
0
x(w)
✆
✝
✆
1
1
x
x
x
x
xx
{xx
☎
1
✆
0
18
G. Amato and F. Scozzari
Note that we have chosen to annotate every sharing group with the corresponding
variable in vars(β(U )). This is not a sharing graph since it is not connected, but if
we take Y = Tρ−1 (u)U = {u, u1 , u2 , u3 , u4 , u5 , u6 }, the restriction of G to the nodes
annotated with a variable in Y is a sharing graph whose resultant ω-sharing group
is x6 y 3 .
4.4 Optimality of Abstract Unification
We now prove that mguω is not only correct, but also optimal for a single binding
substitution, i.e., it is the least correct abstraction. This means proving that, given
a set of ω-sharing groups [S]U ∈ ShLinω , a binding x/t, and an ω-sharing group
B ∈ mguω ([S]U , x/t), there exists a substitution [δ]U such that [S]U 3 [δ]U and
B ∈ αω (mgu([δ]U , {x/t})). First of all, we prove optimality of mguω ([S]U , x/t) in
the special case of vars(x/t) ⊆ U . Next, we extend this result to the general case.
Example 4.27
Consider S = {xu, xv, y} and the binding x/s(y, y). The following is a sharing graph
for x/s(y, y) and S whose resultant ω-sharing group is x2 uvy.
☎
✞
0
xu
✝
✆
1D
DD
DD
DD
D"
✞
✝
y
☎
✞
0
xv
✝
✆
1
zz
z
z
zz
|zz
☎
2
✆
0
We show how to find a substitution [δ]U such that the ω-sharing group x2 uvy ∈
αω (mgu([δ]U , {x/s(y, y)})). Let U = {u, v, x, y}. For each node n of the sharing
graph, we consider a different fresh variable wn . Assume that the node labelled
with xu in the upper-left corner is node 1, and proceed clockwise to number the
other nodes.
For each variable z ∈ U \ {x}, we associate to δ(z) a term containing all the
variables wi such that the label of the i-th node contains the variable z. Thus, we
define δ(u) = r(w1 ) where w1 correspond to the node containing u. Analogously,
we define δ(v) = r(w2 ) and δ(y) = r(w3 ).
We now define δ(x) in a different way, namely by replacing in s(y, y) each occurrence of the variable y with a term similar to δ(y), with the difference that w3
is replaced with the variables w1 and w2 . The choice of w1 and w2 is obvious by
looking at the sharing graph, since the first and second node are the sources of the
two edges targeted at the node three. Therefore we obtain δ(x) = s(r(w1 ), r(w2 )).
Summing up, we have:
δ = {u/r(w1 ), v/r(w2 ), x/s(r(w1 ), r(w2 )), y/r(w3 )} .
It is easy to check that [S]U 3 [δ]U and
mgu(δ, {x/s(y, y)}) =
{u/r(w1 ), v/r(w1 ), x/s(r(w1 ), r(w1 )), y/r(w1 ), w2 /w1 , w3 /w1 } ,
On the interaction between sharing and linearity
19
hence αω ([mgu(δ, {x/s(y, y)})]U ) = [x2 uvy]U .
In the above example we have shown how to find a special substitution such that
its fresh variables are unified according to the arrows in a sharing graph. The same
idea is exploited in the next theorem for proving the optimality of the abstract unification operator mguω . For any ω-sharing group X ∈ mguω ([S]U , x/t), we provide
a substitution δ obtained as in Example 4.27, such that [S]U approximates [δ]U and
X ∈ αω (mgu([δ]U , {x/t)}).
Theorem 4.28 (Optimality of mguω )
The single binding unification mguω ([S]U , x/t) is optimal w.r.t. mgu, under the
assumption that vars(x/t) ⊆ U , i.e., :
∀B ∈ mguω ([S]U , x/t) ∃δ ∈ ISubst. [S]U 3 [δ]U and B ∈ αω (mgu([δ]U , {x/t})) .
The previous proof requires that vars(x/t) ⊆ U . However, the same construction
also works when this condition does not hold.
Example 4.29
Given U = {x, y} and S = {x2 , x2 y}, we want to compute mguω ([S]U , x/s(y, z)). By
extending the domain of the variables of interests, we obtain [S ′ ]V = [x2 , x2 y, z]x,y,z .
One of the sharing graphs for x/s(y, z) and [S ′ ]V is
☎
0
2
x
✝
✆
2
✞
✞
✝
z
☎
1
✆
0
✞
☎
1
/ x2 y
✝
✆
2D
DD
DD
DD
D"
✞
✞
☎
1
z
z
✝
✆
✝
0
☎
1
✆
0
Following the proof of the previous theorem, we obtain the substitution
δ ′ = {x/s(r(w1 ), r(w1 , w2 , w2 )), y/r(w2 ), z/r(w3 , w4 , w5 )} ,
where [S ′ ]V 3[δ ′ ]V and x4 yz 3 ∈ αω (mgu([δ ′ ]V , {x/s(y, z)})). However we are looking
for a substitution δ such that [S]U 3 [δ]U and x4 yz 3 ∈ αω (mgu([δ]U , {x/s(y, z)})).
Nonetheless, we may choose δ = δ ′ (or, if we prefer, δ = δ ′ |x,y ) to get the required
substitution.
This is not a fortuitous coincidence. We may show that it consistently happens
every time we apply Theorem 4.28 to an abstract unification where vars(x/t) * U .
Therefore, we can prove the main result of the paper.
Theorem 4.30 (Optimality of mguω with extension)
The single binding unification mguω with extension is optimal w.r.t. mgu.
4.5 A characterization for resultant sharing groups
The domain ShLinω has not been designed to be directly implemented, but some
of its abstractions could. Providing a simpler definition for the set of resultant ωsharing groups could help in developing the abstract operators for its abstractions.
20
G. Amato and F. Scozzari
We show that given a set S of ω-sharing groups and a binding x/t, the set of
resultant ω-sharing groups has an elegant algebraic characterization.
By definition of sharing graph, a set of nodes N labelled with ω-sharing groups
of S can be turned into a sharing graph for S and x/t if and only if the condition on
the out-degree and in-degree is satisfied and the obtained graph is connected. The
condition on the degrees says that for each node s labelled with the sharing group
Bs , the out-degree of s must be equal to χ(Bs , x). Symmetrically, the in-degree
must be equal to χ(Bs , t). As a consequence, the sum of the out-degrees of all the
P
nodes s∈N χ(Bs , x) must be equal to the sum of the in-degrees of all the nodes
P
s∈N χ(Bs , t). This is because each edge has a source and a target node. Moreover,
in order to be connected, any graph needs at least |N | − 1 edges. Since the number
of edges is equal to the sum of in-degrees of all the nodes, it turns out that such
a sum must be equal to or greater than |N | − 1. Surprisingly, this is enough to
construct a sharing graph from N .
Theorem 4.31
Let S be a set of ω-sharing groups and x/t be a binding. Then B ∈ mguω (S, x/t)
iff there exist n ∈ N+ , B1 , . . . , Bn ∈ S which satisfy the following conditions:
1. B = ⊎1≤i≤n Bi ;
P
P
2.
1≤i≤n χ(Bi , t) ≥ n − 1;
1≤i≤n χ(Bi , x) =
3. either n = 1 or ∀1 ≤ i ≤ n. χ(Bi , x) + χ(Bi , t) > 0.
Following the above theorem, we can give an algebraic characterization of the
abstract unification operator as follows.
Corollary 4.32 (Algebraic characterization of mguω )
Given a set of ω-sharing groups S and a binding x/t, we have that
mguω (S, x/t) = (S \ rel (S, x, t))∪
(
⊎R | R ∈ ℘m (rel (S, x, t)),
X
B∈R
χ(B, x) =
X
)
χ(B, t) ≥ |R| − 1 ,
B∈R
where
rel (S, x, t) = {B ∈ S. χ(B, x) + χ(B, t) > 0}
= {B ∈ S. TBU ∩ vars(x/t) 6= ∅} .
Example 4.33
Consider S = {xa, xb, z 2 , zc} and the equation x = z. Then if we choose R =
P
P
{{xa, xb, z 2 }}, we have B∈R χ(B, x) = 2 = B∈R χ(B, z) ≥ |R| − 1. Therefore
P
x2 z 2 ab ∈ mguω (S, x/z). If we take R = {{xa, xb, zc, zc}}, although B∈R χ(B, x) =
P
2 = B∈R χ(B, z), we have |R| − 1 = 3. This only proves that z 2 c2 x2 ab cannot be
obtained by the multiset R. If we check for every possible multiset over S, we have
that z 2 c2 x2 ab ∈
/ mguω (S, x/z).
This characterization of the abstract mgu will be the key point for devising the
optimal abstract unification operators on the abstractions of ShLinω . Let α be the
abstraction function from ISubst ∼ to an abstract domain A. If we are able to factor
On the interaction between sharing and linearity
21
α through a Galois connection hα′ : ShLinω → A, γ ′ : A → ShLinω i as α = α′ ◦ αω ,
then the optimal abstract unification for α is exactly α′ (mguω (γ ′ (·), ·)). However,
this expression is helpful when it may be simplified in order to use only objects in
A. Our algebraic characterization makes the simplification feasible, as we show in
the following section.
5 Practical domains for program analysis
We consider two domains for sharing analysis with linearity information, namely,
the domain proposed in (King 1994) and the classical reduced product Sharing ×
Lin. They are defined as abstractions of ShLinω through Galois insertions. This
allows us to design optimal abstract operators for both of them, by exploiting the
results introduced so far. By composing each Galois insertion with αω , we get the
corresponding abstraction function for substitutions (Cousot and Cousot 1992a,
Sect. 4.2.3.1).
5.1 King’s domain for linearity and aliasing
We first consider the domain for combined analysis of sharing and linearity in (King
1994). The idea is to enhance the domain Sharing by annotating each sharing
group with linearity information on each variable. For instance, the object xy ∞ z
represents the sharing group xyz and the information that y may be non-linear
(while x and z are definitely linear). The objects in this domain can be easily
viewed as abstraction of ω-sharing groups. Intuitively, in order to abstract an ωsharing groups, one simply needs to replace each exponent equal to or greater than
2 with ∞. Let us now formalize the domain as an abstraction of ShLinω .
An ω-sharing group (which is a multiset V → N whose support is finite) is abstracted into a map o : V →{0, 1, ∞} such that its support ToU = {v ∈ V | o(v) 6= 0}
is finite. We call such a map the 2-sharing group. We use a polynomial notation
for 2-sharing groups as for ω-sharing groups. For instance, o = xy ∞ z denotes the
2-sharing group whose support is ToU = {x, y, z}, such that o(x) = o(z) = 1 and
o(y) = ∞. We denote with ∅ the 2-sharing group with empty support. Note that in
(King 1994) the number 2 is used as an exponent instead of ∞, but we prefer this
notation to be coherent with ω-sharing groups.
We denote min{o(x), 2} by om (x), where the ordering on N is extended in the
obvious way, i.e., for all n ∈ N we have that n < ∞. A 2-sharing group o represents
the sets γ2 (o) of ω-sharing group given by:
γ2 (o) = {B ∈ ℘m (V) | ToU = TBU ∧ ∀x ∈ ToU.om (x) ≤ B(x) ≤ o(x)} .
For instance, the 2-sharing group xy ∞ z represents the set of ω-sharing groups
{xy 2 z, xy 3 z, xy 4 z, xy 5 z, . . .}. The idea is to use 2-sharing groups to keep track of
linearity: if o(x) = ∞, it means that the variable x is not linear in the 2-sharing
group o. In the rest of this section, we use the term “sharing group” as a short form
of 2-sharing group, when this does not cause ambiguity.
An ω-sharing group B may be abstracted into the 2-sharing group α2 (B) given
22
G. Amato and F. Scozzari
by:
α2 (B) = λv ∈ TBU.
(
1 if B(x) = 1,
∞ otherwise.
The next proposition shows two useful properties of the maps α2 and γ2 .
Proposition 5.1
The following properties hold:
U
U
1. α2 ( R) = α2 (R).
2. rel (γ2 (S), x, t)) = γ2 (rel (S, x, t)).
Since we do not want to represent definite non-linearity, we introduce an order
relation over sharing groups as follows:
o ≤ o′ ⇐⇒ ToU = To′ U ∧ ∀x ∈ ToU. o(x) ≤ o′ (x) ,
and we restrict our attention to downward closed sets of sharing groups. We denote
by Sg 2 (V ) the set of 2-sharing groups whose support is a subset of V . The domain
we are interested in is the following:
ShLin2 = [S]U | S ∈ ℘↓ (Sg 2 (U )), U ∈ ℘f (V), S 6= ∅ ⇒ ∅ ∈ S ,
where ℘↓ (Sg 2 (U )) is the powerset of downward closed subsets of Sg 2 (U ) according to ≤ and [S1 ]U1 ≤2 [S2 ]U2 iff U1 = U2 and S1 ⊆ S2 . For instance, the set
{xy ∞ z} is not downward closed, while {xyz, xy ∞ z} is downward closed. There
is a Galois insertion of ShLin2 into ShLinω given by the pair of adjoint maps
γ2 : ShLin2 → ShLinω and α2 : ShLinω → ShLin2 :
h[
i
γ2 ([S]U ) =
{γ2 (o) | o ∈ S}
,
U
α2 ([S]U ) = [↓{α2 (B) | B ∈ S}]U .
With an abuse of notation, we also apply γ2 and α2 to subsets of ω-sharing groups
and 2-sharing groups respectively, by ignoring the set of variables of interest. For
instance, γ2 ({xyz, xy ∞ z}) = {xyz, xy 2 z, xy 3 z, xy 4 z, xy 5 z, . . .}.
Theorem 5.2
The pair hα2 , γ2 i is a Galois insertion.
Now we may define the optimal mgu for ShLin2 and single binding substitutions
as follows:
Definition 5.3 (Unification for ShLin2 )
Given [S]U ∈ ShLin2 and the binding x/t, we define
mgu2 ([S]U , x/t) = α2 (mguω (γ2 ([S]U ), x/t)) .
By construction, mgu2 is the optimal abstraction of mguω , hence also of mgu. In
the case where vars(x/t) ⊆ U , by using additivity of α2 we get:
h
mgu2 ([S]U , x/t) = α2 (γ2 (S) \ rel (γ2 (S), x, t))∪
On the interaction between sharing and linearity
α2 {⊎R | R ∈ ℘m (rel (γ2 (S), x, t)),
i
X
X
χ(B, x) =
χ(B, t) ≥ |R| − 1}
B∈R
U
B∈R
23
. (4)
Now we want to simplify Eq. 4. In particular we would like to get rid of the
abstraction and concretization maps and to express the result using only objects
and operators in ShLin2 . Therefore, we need to define operations in ShLin2 which
correspond to ⊎ and χ in ShLinω .
The operation on 2-sharing groups which corresponds to multiset union on ωsharing groups, is given by
o ⊎ o′ = λv ∈ V.o(v) ⊕ o′ (v) ,
U
where 0⊕x = x⊕0 = x and ∞⊕x = x⊕∞ = 1⊕1 = ∞. We will use {{o1 , . . . , on }}
for o1 ⊎· · ·⊎on . Given a sharing group o, we also define the delinearization operator:
o2 = o ⊎ o .
(5)
Note that o2 = λx ∈ ToU.∞. The operator is extended pointwise to sets and
multisets.
A fundamental role is played by the notion of multiplicity of a sharing group in
a term. While the multiplicity of an ω-sharing group in a term is a single natural
number, every object in ShLin2 represents a set of ω-sharing groups, hence its
multiplicity should be a set of natural numbers. Actually, it is enough to consider
intervals. We define the minimum χm and maximum χM multiplicity of o in t as
follows:
X
X
o(v) · occ(v, t) .
om (v) · occ(v, t)
χM (o, t) =
χm (o, t) =
v∈ToU
v∈ToU
Sum and product on integers are lifted in the obvious way, namely, the sum is ∞ if
and only if at least one of the addenda is ∞ and n · ∞ = ∞ · n = ∞ for any n ∈ N+ ,
while 0 · ∞ = ∞ · 0 = 0. The maximum multiplicity χM (o, t) either is equal to the
minimum multiplicity χm (o, t) or it is infinite. Note that, if B is an ω-sharing group
represented by o, i.e., B ∈ γ2 (o), then χm (o, t) ≤ χ(B, t) ≤ χM (o, t). Actually, not
all the values between χm (o, t) and χM (o, t) may be assumed by χ(B, t).
Example 5.4
Let o = x∞ and t = f (x, x). According, to our definition, χ(o, t) = [4, ∞). However,
it is obvious that if B ∈ γ2 (o), then χ(B, t) is an even number.
According to the above definitions, we define the multiplicity of a multiset of
sharing groups as
n
o
X
X
χ(Y, t) = n ∈ N |
χm (o, t) ≤ n ≤
χM (o, t) .
o∈Y
o∈Y
Even if this is a superset of all the possible values which can be obtained by combining the multiplicities of all the sharing groups in Y , this definition is sufficiently
accurate to allow us to design the optimal abstract unification.
24
G. Amato and F. Scozzari
We extend in the obvious way the definition of rel (see Corollary 4.32) from
ω-sharing groups to 2-sharing groups, i.e.,
rel (S, x, t) = {o ∈ S | ToU ∩ vars(x/t) 6= ∅} ,
and we prove the following
Theorem 5.5 (Characterization of abstract unification for ShLin2 )
Given [S]U ∈ ShLinω and the binding x/t with vars(x/t) ⊆ U , we have that
mgu2 ([S]U , x/t) = [(S \ S ′ )∪
]
↓
Y | Y ∈ ℘m (S ′ ), n ∈ χ(Y, x) ∩ χ(Y, t). n ≥ |Y | − 1 ]U ,
where S ′ = rel (S, x, t).
Example 5.6
Let S = ↓{∅, ux∞ , vx∞ , x∞ y, z ∞ } and Y = {{ux∞ , vx∞ , xy, z ∞ }}. We have that
χ(Y, x) = {n | n ≥ 5} and χ(Y, f (z, z)) = {n | n ≥ 4}. Since f (z, z) contains
two occurrences of z, the “actual” multiplicity of the sharing group z ∞ in f (z, z)
should be a multiple of 2. But we do not need to check this condition and can
safely approximate this set with {n | n ≥ 4}. This works because we can always
choose a number which is contained in both χ(Y, x) and χ(Y, t) and which is an
“actual” multiplicity. For instance, we can take n = 6 ∈ χ(Y, x) ∩ χ(Y, f (z, z)) and
U
since we have 6 ≥ 3 = |Y | − 1, we get that the sharing group Y = uvx∞ yz ∞
belongs to mgu2 ([S]U , x/f (z, z)). This sharing group can be generated by the substitution {x/f (f (u, u, y), f (v, v, y)), z/f (w, w, w)} when the variables of interest are
{u, v, x, y, z}.
Theorem 5.5 gives a characterization of the abstract unification over ShLin2 .
However, it cannot be directly implemented, since one needs to check a certain
condition for each element of ℘m (rel (S, x, t)), which is an infinite set. Nonetheless,
this is an important starting point to prove correctness and completeness of the
abstract unification algorithm which we are going to introduce.
The characterization in Theorem 5.5 may be used even when vars(x/t) * U , if
we first enlarge the set of variables of interest in order to include all vars(x/t).
Theorem 5.7 (Characterization of abstract unification with extension for ShLin2 )
Given [S]U in ShLin2 and the binding x/t, let V = {v1 , . . . , vn } be vars(x/t) \ U .
Then,
mgu2 ([S]U , x/t) = mgu2 ([S ∪ {v1 , . . . , vn }]U∪V , x/t) .
The previous theorem states that enlarging the set of variables of interest preserves
optimality.
5.2 An algorithm for abstract unification in ShLin2
In order to obtain an algorithm from the characterization in Theorem 5.5 we need
to avoid the use of ℘m (rel (S, x, t)) and to develop a procedure able to compute
On the interaction between sharing and linearity
25
the resultant sharing groups by inspecting subsets (not multisets!) of rel (S, x, t). In
general, any X ⊆ rel (S, x, t) yields more than one sharing group, since every element
in X may be considered more than once. However, since ShLin2 is downward closed,
it is enough to compute the maximal resultant sharing groups.
Given X ⊆ rel (S, x, t) and the binding x/t, assume that we are only interested
U
in those sharing groups whose support is T XU. By joining (multiple copies of)
U
U
the sharing groups in X, any resultant sharing group o is between X and X 2 ,
U
U 2
i.e., X ≤ o ≤ X , where X 2 is the pointwise extension of the delinearization
operator (see Eq. 5). Note that, if X is badly chosen, it is possible that we are
not able to generate any sharing group with this support. In this computation, the
notion of multiplicity of a sharing group in a term plays a major role.
U
For example, given the binding x/t, if χM (o, x) ≤ 1 for each o ∈ X, then X is
a resultant sharing group only if there is a unique sharing group o ∈ X such that
vars(t)∩ToU 6= ∅. If there are o1 , o2 ∈ X such that χM (o1 , x) > 1 and χM (o2 , t) > 1
U
then X is a resultant sharing group. Moreover, we may join two copies of each
U
sharing group in X, and therefore also X 2 is a resultant sharing group.
Now we can define the notions of linearity and non-linearity on the abstract
domain. In addition, we also introduce a new notion of strong non-linearity. Given
X ⊆ rel (S, x, t), we partition X in three subsets Xx = {o ∈ X | χM (o, t) = 0},
Xt = {o ∈ X | χM (o, x) = 0} and Xxt = X \ (Xx ∪ Xt ).
Definition 5.8
Given a set S of sharing groups and X ⊆ rel(S, x, t), we say that X is:
• linear for the term t if for all o ∈ X it holds that χM (o, t) ≤ 1;
• non-linear for the term t if there exists o ∈ X such that χM (o, t) > 1;
• strongly non-linear for the term t if there exists o ∈ X such that χM (o, t) = ∞
or there exists o ∈ Xxt such that χM (o, t) > 1.
Analogously, we define linearity and non-linearity of X for the variable x.
Note that, if t is a variable, the non-linear and strongly non-linear cases coincide.
We now present the algorithm for computing the abstract unification in ShLin2 .
Theorem 5.9 (Abstract unification algorithm for ShLin2 )
Given [S]U ∈ ShLin2 and the binding x/t with vars(x/t) ⊆ U , we have
[
mgu2 ([S]U , x/t) = [(S \ S ′ ) ∪ ↓
res(X, x, t)]U ,
X⊆S ′
where S ′ = rel (S, x, t) and res(X, x, t) is defined as follows:
U
1. if X is non-linear for x and t, then res(X, x, t) = { X 2 };
2. if X is non-linear for x and linear for t, |Xx | ≤ 1 and |Xt | ≥ 1, then we have
U
U 2
U
res(X, x, t) = {( Xx ) ⊎ ( Xxt
) ⊎ ( Xt2 )};
3. if X is linear for x and strongly non-linear for t, |Xx | ≥ 1 and |Xt | ≤ 1, then
U
U 2
U
we have res(X, x, t) = {( Xx2 ) ⊎ ( Xxt
) ⊎ ( Xt )};
26
G. Amato and F. Scozzari
4. if X is linear for x and not strongly non-linear for t, |Xt | ≤ 1, then we have
]
]
]
2
res(X, x, t) = {( Z) ⊎ ( Xxt
) ⊎ ( Xt ) | Z ∈ ℘m (Xx ),
|Z| = χM (Xt , t) = χm (Xt , t),
TZU = Xx } ;
5. otherwise res(X, x, t) = ∅.
Example 5.10
Let U = {u, v, x, y} and consider the set of 2-sharing groups S = {∅, xu, x∞ , xy, yv}
and consider the binding x/r(y, y). Note that S ′ = {xu, x∞ , xy, yv}. Let us compute
res(X, x, r(y, y)) for some X’s, subsets of S ′ .
• X = {x∞ , yv}. In this case, χM (x∞ , x) = ∞ and χM (yv, r(y, y) = 2, hence
X is non-linear for x and r(y, y). From the first case of Theorem 5.9, we have
U
U
that res(X, x, r(y, y)) = { X 2 } = { {x∞ , y ∞ v ∞ } = {x∞ y ∞ v ∞ };
• X = {xu, xy, yv}. Then X is linear for x and strongly non-linear for r(y, y),
since xy ∈ Xxt and χM (xy, r(y, y)) = 2. From the third case, it follows that
U
U
U
res(X, x, t) = {( {xu}2 ) ⊎ ( {xy}2 ) ⊎ ( {yv})} = {x∞ y ∞ u∞ v};
• X = {xu, yv}. Then X is linear for x and not strongly non-linear for r(y, y)
(note that χM (yv, r(y, y)) = 2 > 1 and yv ∈ Xt , hence X is non-linear for
r(y, y) but it is not strongly non-linear). Since χM (Xt , r(y, y)) = 2, we only
need to consider those Z ∈ ℘m (Xx ) such that |Z| = 2. There is only one such
U
set, which is Z = {{xu, xu}}. Therefore res(X, x, r(y, y)) = {( {{xu, xu}}) ⊎
U 2
U
( {} ) ⊎ ( {yv})} = {x∞ yu∞ v}.
Note that, given X ⊆ S ′ , if x does not appear in any sharing group of S, then
res(X, x, t) ⊆ {∅}. In fact, we can only apply the fourth or fifth case. In the fourth
case, we have that Xx = Xxt = ∅, and thus the only Z ∈ ℘m (Xx ) is the empty
multiset. Thus, |Z| = 0, which implies that Xt = ∅, and res(X, x, t) = {∅}. In
the fifth case, the result is trivially the emptyset. Symmetrically, when none of the
variables of t appears in S, again we can apply only the fourth or fifth case, and
res(X, x, t) ⊆ {∅}.
Example 5.11
Consider S and U as in Example 5.10. We compute mgu2 ([S]U , x/r(y, y)). We show
the value of res(X, x, r(y, y)) for every X ⊆ S ′ = rel (S, x, r(y, y)) which contains
On the interaction between sharing and linearity
27
both the variables x and y:
X
res(S, x, r(y, y))
case in Theorem 5.9
x∞ , xy
x∞ , yv
x∞ , xy, yv
x∞ , xu, xy
x∞ , xu, yv
x∞ , xu, xy, yv
xu, xy
xu, yv
xu, xy, yv
x∞ y ∞
x∞ y ∞ v ∞
x∞ y ∞ v ∞
x∞ y ∞ u∞
x∞ y ∞ u∞ v ∞
x∞ y ∞ u∞ v ∞
x∞ y ∞ u∞
x∞ yu∞ v
x∞ y ∞ u∞ v
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
4
3
Hence
mgu2 ([S]U , x/r(y, y)) =
↓{∅, x∞ y ∞ , x∞ y ∞ v ∞ , x∞ y ∞ u∞ , x∞ y ∞ u∞ v ∞ , x∞ yu∞ v, x∞ y ∞ u∞ v}
The main difference between the algorithm in Theorem 5.9 and the characterization in Theorem 5.5 is that in the former X is a subset of S ′ while, in Theorem 5.5, Y
is a multiset over S ′ . Since the number of subsets of S ′ is finite, the characterization
in Theorem 5.9 is an algorithm.
Obviously, a direct implementation of mgu2 would be very slow, so that appropriate data structures and procedures should be developed for a real implementation.
Although this is mostly out of the scope of this paper, we show here that the
definition of mgu2 ([S]U , x/t) may be modified to consider only maximal subsets
of rel (S, x, t). This should help in reducing the computational complexity of the
abstract operator.
Given [A]U ∈ ShLin2 , let max A be the set of maximal elements of A, i.e.,
max A = {a ∈ A | ∄b ∈ A.b >2 a}. Given a sharing group o, we define the linearized version of o, denoted by l(o), as
(
1 if v ∈ ToU ,
l(o)(v) =
0 otherwise .
The linearization operator l is extended pointwise to sets of sharing groups. We
show that instead of choosing X as a subset of S ′ in the definition of mgu2 , we may
only consider those X’s which are subsets of max S ′ .
Theorem 5.12
Given [S]U ∈ ShLin2 and the binding x/t with vars(x/t) ⊆ U , we have
[
mgu2 ([S]U , x/t) = [(S \ S ′ ) ∪ ↓
(res(X, x, t) ∪ res ′ (X, x, t))]U ,
X⊆max S ′
where S ′ = rel (S, x, t) and
( U
{ X 2}
res ′ (X, x, t) =
∅
if X = Xxt and l(X) is linear for t ,
otherwise .
28
G. Amato and F. Scozzari
The next examples compare our optimal abstract unification operator to the
original one and show the increase in precision.
Example 5.13
Let U = {u, v, w, x, y}. Consider the set of 2-sharing groups S = {∅, xu, xv, xw, y}.
We compute mgu2 ([S]U , x/r(y, y)). Since rel(S, x, r(y, y)) = S, we need to consider any X ⊆ S. If y ∈
/ X then clearly res(X, x, r(y, y)) = ∅. If y ∈ X, since
χM (y, r(y, y)) = 2, it follows that X is linear for x and not strongly non-linear for
r(y, y). Thus
mgu2 ([S]U , x/r(y, y)) = [↓{∅, x∞ u∞ y, x∞ uvy, x2 uwy, x∞ v ∞ y, x∞ vwy, x∞ w∞ y}]U
On the other hand, computing with the unification algorithm given in (King 1994),
the result is
↓{∅, x∞ u∞ y, x∞ u∞ v ∞ y, x∞ u∞ w∞ y,
x∞ v ∞ y, x∞ v ∞ w∞ y, x∞ w∞ y, x∞ u∞ v ∞ w∞ y} .
The old algorithm is not able to infer the linearity which arises when combining two
distinct sharing groups from {xu, xv, xw} with {y}. Moreover, it does not assert
that the variables u, v, w cannot share a common variable.
Example 5.14
Let U = {u, x, y, z} and S = {∅, xu, xy, yz}. By computing mgu2 ([S]U , x/r(y))
we obtain ↓{∅, x∞ y ∞ , x∞ uy ∞ z}, which shows that u and z are linear after the
unification. This is not the case when computing with the unification algorithm in
(King 1994), since we obtain ↓{∅, x∞ y ∞ , x∞ u∞ y ∞ z ∞ , x∞ u∞ y ∞ , x∞ y ∞ z ∞ }. Note
that, we also improve the groundness information. In fact, in our result, groundness
of u implies groundness of z.
Both examples show the increased precision w.r.t. King’s algorithm. In the first
example, we obtain optimality thanks to the introduction of the notion of (non-)
strong non-linearity. In the second example, we improve the result since we do
not need to consider independence between x and t, in order to exploit linearity
information.
5.3 Unification for multi-binding substitutions
The unification operator on ShLin2 has been defined for single binding substitutions. It is possible to extend this operator to multi-binding substitutions in the
obvious way, namely by iterating the single binding operators.
mgu2 ([S]U , {x/t} ⊎ θ) = mgu2 (mgu2 ([S]U , x/t), θ) .
However, defined in such a way, mgu2 is not optimal. Consider, for example, S =
{∅, xz, yw}, U = {x, y, z, w}, and the substitution θ = {x/r(y, y), z/w}. We have
that mgu2 ([S]U , x/r(y, y)) = [↓ {∅, x∞ z ∞ yw}]U . Since x∞ zyw ≤2 x∞ z ∞ yw, by
applying the third case of mgu2 to Y = {x∞ zyw} we get
mgu2 ([↓ {∅, z ∞ x∞ yw}]U , z/w) = [↓ {∅, x∞ y ∞ z ∞ w∞ }]U .
On the interaction between sharing and linearity
29
However,
α2 (mguω (γ2 ([{∅, xz, yw}]U , θ)))
= α2 (mguω ([{xz, yw}]U , θ))
= α2 (mguω ([{wx2 yz 2 }]U , {z/w}))
= α2 ([{{}}]U ) = [∅]U ,
which shows that mgu2 is not optimal. Note that, we do not use optimality of mguω
to prove this result, since correctness is enough.
The problem is that, to be able to conclude that the unification of S with θ is
ground, we need to keep track of the fact that, after the first binding, w is linear
and z is definitively non-linear. Since ShLin2 is downward closed, we are not able
to state this property. Note that, in the case we have presented here, by changing
the order of the bindings we get an optimal result in ShLin2 , but this happens just
by accident.
Now, consider the substitution θ = {x/r(y, ...., y), z/s(y, ..., y), u/v} with S =
{∅, xu, zv, y} and U = {u, v, x, y, z}. Assume that r(y, ...., y) is an n-ary term,
s(y, ..., y) is an m-ary term with n 6= m and n, m ≥ 2. We have that:
mgu2 ([S]U , x/r(y, ...., y)) = [↓{∅, x∞ u∞ y, zv}]U ,
mgu2 ([↓{∅, x∞ u∞ y, zv}]U , z/s(y, ..., y)) = [↓{∅, x∞ u∞ z ∞ v ∞ y}]U ,
mgu2 ([↓{∅, x∞ u∞ z ∞ v ∞ y}]U , u/v) = [↓{∅, x∞ u∞ z ∞ v ∞ y}]U .
On the other hand, we have that:
α2 (mguω (γ2 ([{∅, xu, zv, y}]U , θ)))
= α2 (mguω ([{xu, zv, y}]U , θ))
= α2 (mguω ([{xn un y, zv}]U , {z/s(y, ..., y), u/v}))
= α2 (mguω ([{xn un yz m v m }]U , {u/v}))
= α2 ([{{}}]U ) = [∅]U .
However, if n = m, we have:
α2 (mguω (γ2 ([{∅, xu, zv, y}]U , θ)))
= α2 ([{{{}}} ∪ {xkn ukn y k z kn v kn | k ∈ N}]U )
= [↓{∅, x∞ u∞ z ∞ v ∞ y}]U .
In this case, keeping track of the variables which are definitively non-linear does
not help. It seems that, in order to compute abstract unification one binding at
a time, we need to work in a domain which is able to keep track of the exact
multiplicity of variables in a sharing group. Actually, this is how ShLinω works.
Obviously, we could try to develop a different algorithm for unification in ShLin2
which directly works with multi-binding substitutions. However, since the algorithm
for single binding substitutions is already quite complex, we think this is not worth
the effort.
30
G. Amato and F. Scozzari
5.4 The domain Sharing × Lin
The reduced product ShLin = Sharing × Lin has been used for a long time in the
analysis of aliasing properties, since it was recognized that the precision of these
analyses could be greatly improved by keeping track of the linear variables. Among
the papers which consider the domain ShLin, we refer to (Hans and Winkler 1992)
and (Hill et al. 2004). Actually, these papers also deal with freeness properties,
which we do not consider here, to further improve precision. Although the domain
ShLin has been used for many years, the optimal unification operator is as yet
unknown, even for a single binding substitution. We provide here a new abstract
operator for ShLin, designed from the abstract unification for ShLin2 , and we prove
that it is optimal for single binding substitutions.
The domain ShLin keeps track of linearity by recording, for each object of
Sharing, the set of linear variables. Each element is now a triple: the first component is an object of Sharing, the second component is an object of Lin, that is, the
set of variables which are linear in all the sharing groups of the first component,
and the third component is the set of variables of interest. It is immediate that
ShLin is an abstraction of ShLin2 (and thus of ShLinω ). In the following, we briefly
recall the definition of the abstract domain and provide the abstraction function
from ShLin2 .
ShLin = {[S, L, U ] | S ⊆ ℘(U ), (S 6= ∅ ⇒ ∅ ∈ S), L ⊇ U \ vars(S), U ∈ ℘f (V)} ,
with the approximation relation ≤sl defined as [S, L, U ] ≤sl [S ′ , L′ , U ′ ] iff U = U ′ ,
S ⊆ S ′ , L ⊇ L′ . There is a Galois insertion of ShLin into ShLin2 given by the pair
of maps:
αsl ([S]U ) = [{ToU | o ∈ S}, {x ∈ U | ∀o ∈ S. o(x) ≤ 1}, U ] ,
γsl ([S, L, U ]) = [{BL | B ∈ S}]U ,
where BL is the 2-sharing group which has the same support of B, with linear
variables dictated by the set L. In formula:
∞ if B ∈ U \ L,
BL = λv ∈ V. 1
if B ∈ L,
0
otherwise.
The functional composition of αω , α2 and αsl gives the standard abstraction
map from substitutions to ShLin. We still use the polynomial notation to represent
sharing groups, but now all the exponents are fixed to one. Note that the last
component U in [S, L, U ] is redundant since it can be retrieved as L ∪ vars(S). This
is because the set L contains all the ground variables.
5.5 Abstract unification for Sharing × Lin
In order to obtain a correct and optimal abstract unification over ShLin, the trivial
way is to directly compute αsl (mgu2 (γsl ([S, L, U ]), x/t)). However, we prefer to give
On the interaction between sharing and linearity
31
an unification operator similar to the other operators for ShLin in the literature
(Howe and King 2003; Bagnara et al. 2005; Hill et al. 2004). As for the domain
ShLin2 , we now provide the notions of multiplicity and linearity over ShLin.
Given a set L of linear variables, we define the maximum multiplicity of a sharing
group o in a term t as follows:
(P
v∈o occ(v, t) if o ∩ vars(t) ⊆ L
χL
M (o, t) =
∞
otherwise
According to the similar definition for 2-sharing groups, given [S, L, U ] ∈ ShLin, we
say that (S, L) is linear for a term t when for all o ∈ S it holds that χL
M (o, t) ≤ 1.
Note that, when t is a variable, the definition boils down to check whether t ∈ L.
Given X ⊆ rel (S, x, t), we fix the set L of linear variables and partition X in
L
three subsets Xx = {o ∈ X | χL
M (o, t) = 0}, Xt = {o ∈ X | χM (o, x) = 0} and
Xxt = X \ (Xx ∪ Xt ). Moreover, we need to define the following subsets of X:
Xt=∞
Xt=1
=1
Xxt
= {B ∈ Xt | χL
M (B, t) = ∞},
= {B ∈ Xt | χL
M (B, t) = 1},
= {B ∈ Xxt | χL
M (B, t) = 1},
Xt∈N
Xt>1
>1
Xxt
= {B ∈ Xt | χL
M (B, t) ∈ N},
= {B ∈ Xt | χL
M (B, t) > 1},
L
= {Xxt | χM (B, t) > 1}.
Since we do not deal with definite linearity, we need to take into account the sharing
groups which can be obtained by linearizing variables. This may be accomplished
U
by using the set U instead of L when computing the multiplicity. We denote by Xxt
the set
U
Xxt
= {B ∈ Xxt | χU
M (B, t) = 1} ,
which corresponds to the linearizable sharing groups.
Moreover, given sets A1 , . . . , An with n ≥ 2 we denote by bin(A1 , . . . , An ) the
S
S
set { {a1 , . . . , an } | a1 ∈ A1 , . . . , an ∈ An }, by A∗ the set { B | B ⊆ A} and by
S
A+ the set { B | B ⊆ A, B 6= ∅}. This notation slightly deviates from most of
other literature on Sharing, where A∗ does not include the empty set. We prefer
to adopt a double notation, namely, A∗ and A+ , which is more standard in the rest
of the research community.
Definition 5.15 (Abstract unification algorithm for ShLin)
Given [S, L, U ] ∈ ShLin and the binding x/t such that vars(x/t) ⊆ U , we define
mgusl ([S, L, U ], x/t) = [(S \ X) ∪ K, U ′ ∪ L′ , U ] ,
where X = rel (S, x, t) = {B ∈ S | B∩vars(x/t) 6= ∅} and U ′ = U \vars((S\X)∪K).
Here, K is the set of new sharing groups created by the unification process and U ′
is the set of variables which do not appear in any sharing group of the result, i.e.
the set of ground variables. K is defined as follows:
32
G. Amato and F. Scozzari
• If x ∈ L:
∗
K = bin(Xt=∞ , Xx+ , Xxt
)∪
>1
∗
bin(Xt ∪ {∅}, Xxt
, Xx+ , Xxt
)∪
=1 ∗
bin({{o} ∪ (∪Z) | o ∈ Xt∈N , Z ⊆ Xx , 1 ≤ |Z| ≤ χL
M (o, t)}, (Xxt ) )∪
(6)
U +
(Xxt
) .
• If x ∈
/ L:
>1
K = bin(Xt>1 ∪ Xxt
, Xx ∪ Xxt , X ∗ )∪
=1
=1 ∗
bin((Xt=1 )+ , Xx ∪ Xxt
, (Xxt
) )∪
=1 +
(Xxt
)
(7)
.
Finally, the set L′ of linear variables which are not ground is
L \ (vars(Xx ∪ Xxt ) ∩ vars(Xt ∪ Xxt )) if (S, L) is linear for x and t,
L \ vars(X ∪ X )
otherwise, if (S, L) is linear for x,
x
xt
L′ =
(8)
otherwise, if (S, L) is linear for t,
L \ vars(Xt ∪ Xxt )
L \ vars(X)
otherwise.
Theorem 5.16 (Optimality of mgusl )
The operator mgusl in Definition 5.15 is correct and optimal w.r.t. mgu, when
vars(x/t) ⊆ U .
Example 5.17
Let S = {∅, xv, xy, zw}, L = {v, w, x, y}, U = {v, w, x, y, z} and consider the binding x/f (y, z). It is easy to check that (S, L) is linear for x but not for t. Applying our operator, we obtain mgusl ([S, L, U ], x/f (y, z)) = [S ′ , L′ , U ] with S ′ =
{∅, xy, vwxyz, vwxz} and L′ = {w}. This is more precise that the operators for
Sharing × Lin in (Hans and Winkler 1992). Actually, even using the optimizations
proposed in (Howe and King 2003; Hill et al. 2004), one obtains as result the object
[{vxy, vwxz, xy, wxyz, vwxyz}, {w}, U ] .
The optimization proposed in (Bagnara et al. 2005) is not applicable as it is, since it
requires vars(rel (S, x)) and vars(rel (S, f (y, z))) to be disjoint. Even assuming that
this test for independence may be removed as unnecessary, the final result would
be the same as above. In both cases, our operator is able to prove that vxy and
wxyz are not possible sharing groups.
Note that, in a domain for rational trees, the sharing group vxy is needed for
correctness, since the unification of {x/f (f (v, y), c), z/w} with the binding x/f (y, z)
succeeds with {x/f (f (v, y), c), z/c, w/c, y/f (v, y)}. This means that we are able to
exploit the occur-check of the unification in finite trees. As a consequence, our
abstract unification operator is not correct w.r.t. a concrete domain of rational
substitutions (King 2000).
On the interaction between sharing and linearity
33
An alternative would be to compute the abstract unification following Theorem
5.9 with χM and ⊎ replaced by χL
M and ∪ respectively (we can obviously ignore the
delinearization operator ( )2 since B ∪ B = B). However, we do not pursue further
this approach.
In the case vars(x/t) * U , we may proceed as for ShLinω and ShLin2 : enlarge the
set of variables of interest in order to include all vars(x/t) and compute unification
with mgusl .
Definition 5.18 (Abstract unification algorithm with extension in ShLin)
Given [S, L, U ] ∈ ShLin and the binding x/t, let V = {v1 , . . . , vn } be vars(x/t) \ U .
We define:
mgusl ([S, L, U ], x/t) = mgusl ([S ∪ {v1 , . . . , vn }, L ∪ V, U ∪ V ], x/t) .
Theorem 5.19 (Optimality of mgusl with extension)
The operator mgusl in Definition 5.18 is the optimal abstraction of mgu.
Although the abstract operator mgusl is optimal for the unification with a single
binding, the optimal operator for a multi-binding substitution cannot be obtained
by considering one binding at a time. This is a consequence of the fact that the
corresponding operator for single binding unification on ShLin2 cannot be extended
to an optimal multi-binding operator by simply considering one binding at a time.
In fact, all the counterexamples in Section 5.3 are also counterexamples for mgusl ,
since it is the case that [S]U = γsl (αsl ([S]U )).
6 Optimal unification in practice
In this section, we give some evidence that there are practical advantages in using
the optimal unification operators for ShLin. It is far beyond the scope of this paper to provide an experimental evaluation of the new algorithms, but the results
in (Bagnara et al. 2005) give some hints on its possible outcome. Bagnara et al.
(2005) introduce an improvement for Sharing × Lin × Free exploiting some ideas
from King’s unification operator for the domain ShLin2 . In this way, they improve
precision in a few cases and show that efficiency of the analysis is more likely to be
increased than decreased. In fact, even if the final result of the analysis does not
change, a more precise operator may reduce the number of sharing groups in the
intermediate steps, which helps performance. Hence, we expect the optimal unification for ShLin to further improve the analysis, both in efficiency and precision. This
is more evident if we consider that Bagnara et al. (2005) measure precision in terms
of the number of independent pairs (as well as definitively ground, free and linear
variables) and do not consider set-sharing. However, Bueno and Garcı́a de la Banda
(2004) show that set-sharing information may be useful in several application of the
analysis, such as parallelization of logic programs. Hence, a greater improvement in
precision is to be expected if we consider the full set-sharing property.
We now provide a concrete example of a simple program where our abstract
operators give better results than the operators known in the literature.
34
G. Amato and F. Scozzari
6.1 An example: difference lists
We work with difference lists, an alternative data structure to lists for representing
a sequence of elements. A difference list is a term of the kind A \ B where A and
B are lists, which represents the list obtained by removing B from the tail of A.
For example, using PROLOG notation for lists, [1, 2, 3, 4] \ [3, 4] represents the list
[1, 2], while [1, 2, 3|x] \ x and [1, 2, 3] \ [] represent the list [1, 2, 3]. The difference
lists whose tail is a variable (such as [1, 2, 3|x] \ x) are mostly useful, since they can
be concatenated in constant time. An overview of difference lists may be found in
(Sterling and Shapiro 1994).
We define the predicate difflist /3, which translates lists to difference lists and
vice-versa. The goal ← difflist (l, h, t) succeeds when the difference list h\t represents
the standard list l. For example, difflist ([], x, x) and difflist ([1, 2, 3], [1, 2, 3|x], x)
succeed without any further instantiation of variables. In order to improve the precision of the analysis, we keep head and tail of difference lists in separate predicate
arguments. The code for difflist /3, in head normal form, is the following.
difflist (l, h, t) ← l = [], h = t.
difflist (l, h, t) ← l = [x|l′ ], h = [x|h′ ], difflist (l′ , h′ , t).
where l, l′ (list), h, h′ (head), t (tail) and x are variables. We informally compute
the goal-independent analysis of difflist on the domain ShLin, which gives:
Jdifflist K0 =[{∅}, {l, h, t}, {l, h, t}] ,
Jdifflist K1 =[{∅, ht, hl}, {l, h, t}, {l, h, t}] ,
Jdifflist K2 =Jdifflist K1 .
The result of the analysis is not affected by our improved unification operator:
the standard mgu for ShLin, as given in (Hans and Winkler 1992), yields exactly
the same result. Now, suppose we want to analyze the goal ← difflist (l, h, h). This
corresponds to the goal ← difflist (l, h, t), h = t in head normal form. Its semantics
may be computed, using our operators, as
mgusl ([{∅, ht, hl}, {l, h, t}, {l, h, t}], h/t) = [{∅, ht}, {l}, {l, h, t}] .
By projecting over l and h, we get [{∅, h}, {l}, {l, h}]. Hence, the analysis is able to
infer that, upon exiting the goal ← difflist (l, h, h), the variable l is ground.
By using the standard mgu for ShLin in (Hans and Winkler 1992), we get
[{∅, ht, htl}, {l}, {l, h, t}] ,
(9)
hence l is detected to be linear but not ground. The optimizations introduced
in (Howe and King 2003; Hill et al. 2004; Bagnara et al. 2005) do not improve
this result. This is a consequence of the fact that these optimizations have been
developed to be correct also for rational trees. In this case, you cannot infer that
l is ground after ← difflist (l, h, h) since the substitution in rational solved form
{l/[v], h/[v|h]} is a correct answer for the same goal.
If we perform the analysis in ShLin2 , using our operators we have Jdifflist K =
[{∅, hl, ht}]lht and the result for the goal ← difflist (l, h, h) is [{∅, h}]lh . However,
On the interaction between sharing and linearity
35
by using the original operator in (King 1994), the semantics of difflist does not
change, but the result for the goal ← difflist (l, h, h) is [{∅, h∞ , h∞ l∞ }]lh thus l is
not proven to be either ground or linear.
The fact that optimal operators improve groundness information is somehow
surprising. Generally, one expects that groundness affects aliasing analysis, but not
vice-versa. In fact, it is well known that Sharing is a refinement (Cortesi et al.
1997) of the domain Def. However, as far as groundness is concerned, the precision
of Sharing and Def is the same, i.e., the other objects included in Sharing do
not improve groundness analysis (Cortesi et al. 1998). As far as we know, there is
no abstract unification operator in the literature, for a domain dealing with sharing, freeness and linearity, which is more precise that Def for groundness. On the
contrary, the example above shows that ShLin, endowed with the optimal unification, improves over Def. Amazingly, in this example ShLin is even better than Pos
(Armstrong et al. 1994). In the latter, the abstract semantics of difflist is h ↔ (l∧t),
i.e., h is ground iff both l and t are ground. The result of the analysis for the goal
← difflist (l, h, h) is ∃t (h ↔ (l ∧ t) ∧ h ↔ t). This is equivalent to h → l which does
not imply groundness of l. Actually, h → l is the groundness information which
may be inferred by (9).
6.2 Another example for ShLin2
As far as we know, there is no implementation or experimental evaluation of the
domain ShLin2 . We think it would be worthwhile to give such an implementation
and that there is some evidence that ShLin2 improves over ShLin also in practice.
For instance, we show a simple program where King’s domain is more precise than
ShLin with optimal operators.
We provide a variant of the predicate difflist /3, which we call difflist ′ /2, with
only two arguments: head and tail of the difference list are encoded in the second
argument as the term head \ tail .
difflist ′ (l, d) ← l = [], d = h \ h.
difflist ′ (l, d) ← l = [x|l′ ], d = [x|h] \ t, d′ = h \ t, difflist ′ (l′ , d′ ).
We informally compute the goal-independent analysis of difflist ′ on the domain
ShLin, which gives:
Jdifflist ′ K0 =[{∅}, {d, l}, {d, l}] ,
Jdifflist ′ K1 =[{∅, dl, d}, {l}, {d, l}] ,
Jdifflist ′ K2 =Jdifflist ′ K1 .
The same analysis, computed over ShLin2 , gives
Jdifflist ′ K0 =[{∅}]dl ,
Jdifflist ′ K1 =[{∅, dl, d, d∞ }]dl ,
Jdifflist ′ K2 =Jdifflist ′ K1 .
Now, suppose we want to analyze the goal ← difflist ′ (l, d), d = [x1 , x2 |h] \ t,
36
G. Amato and F. Scozzari
which extracts the first two elements from the difference list d. In ShLin we have
the following
mgusl ([{∅, dl, d}, {l}, {d, l}], d/[x1, x2 |h] \ t) =
[{∅} ∪ bin({dl, d}, {x1 , x2 , h, t}∗ ), {l}, {d, l, x1, x2 , h, t}] .
Note that the sharing group dlx1 x2 is part of the result. If we repeat the analysis
in ShLin2 , we have
mgu2 ([{∅, dl, d, d∞ }]dl , d/[x1 , x2 |h] \ t) = {∅, dlx1 , dlx2 , dlh, dlt} ∪
]
∞ ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞
↓
X | X ∈ ℘({d∞ x∞
1 , d x2 , d h , d t }) dlx1 x2 ht .
This result does not contain the sharing group dlx1 x2 .
Generally speaking, it is easier to analyze the predicate difflist /3 than difflist ′ /2.
Codish et al. (2000) propose a method named untupling which is able to automatically recover difflist /3 from difflist ′ /2.
7 Related work
In this paper, we work with a concrete domain of substitutions on finite trees. In
the literature, some authors deal with rational trees.
Since any correct operator for rational trees is also correct for finite trees, we can
compare the unification operators for rational trees with ours (of course, this is not
entirely fair as far as the precision is concerned). The opposite is not true, since an
abstract unification operator for finite trees may be able to exploit the occur-check
condition. We have shown in Example 5.17 that our optimal operator can exploit
the occur-check condition, and thus it is not correct for rational trees.
7.1 Sharing
It is well-known that the abstract unification operator of the domain Sharing alone
(i.e., without any freeness or linearity information) is optimal. Cortesi and Filé
(1999) give a formal proof of optimality, considering a slightly different unification operator with two abstract objects and a concrete substitution. Since the two
abstract objects are renamed apart, it is equivalent to consider a single abstract
object. The basic idea underlying the proof is to exhibit, for each sharing group in
the result of the unification, a pair of concrete substitutions generating the resulting
sharing group. We follow the same constructive schema in the proof of optimality
for ShLinω (but we look for a single substitution, due to the different concrete operator). Instead, to prove optimality for ShLin and ShLin2 , we use a direct approach
and show that the abstract unification operator corresponds to the best correct
abstraction (i.e., α ◦ mguω ◦ γ) of the unification on ShLinω with simple (although
tedious) algebraic manipulations.
A different unification operator has been proposed in (Amato and Scozzari 2002;
Amato and Scozzari 2009) for goal-dependent analysis of Sharing. In this paper,
the standard unification operator is splitted into two different operators for forward
On the interaction between sharing and linearity
37
and backward unification. Both operators are proved to be optimal and the overall
analysis is strictly more precise than the analysis performed on Sharing equipped
with the standard operator.
As far as we know, these are the only optimality results for domains encoding
aliasing properties.
7.2 Sharing × Lin
In most of the work combining sharing and linearity, freeness information is included
in the abstract domain. In fact, freeness may improve the precision of the aliasing
component and it is also interesting by itself, for example in the parallelization
of logic programs (Hermenegildo and Rossi 1995). In this comparison, we do not
consider the freeness component.
The first work which combines set-sharing with linearity is (Langen 1990), followed by (Hans and Winkler 1992). The initial unification algorithm has been
improved by Howe and King (2003) and Hill et al. (2004) by removing an independence test. This increases the number of cases when linearity information may
be exploited. Bagnara et al. (2005) propose a different improvement, adopting an
idea by King (1994) for the domain ShLin2 , which simplifies the unification of a
linear term with a non-linear one. Example 5.17 shows that, even adopting all these
improvements, we still obtain a strictly more precise operator. Since our operator
is optimal, any further improvement is now impossible.
Bagnara et al. (2002) show that, if we are only interested in pair-sharing information, Sharing is redundant. They propose a new domain SS ρ which is obtained by
discharging redundant sharing groups. A sharing group B in a set S is redundant
if |B| > 2 and ∀x, y ∈ B. ∃C ∈ S. {x, y} ⊆ C ⊂ B. Analyses performed with SS ρ
are shown to be as precise as those performed with Sharing, if only pair-sharing
information is required. Hill et al. (2004) introduce the domain SS ρ × Lin × Free.
Example 5.17 shows that our operator is still more precise (of course, without considering the freeness component), because of the sharing group vxy which does not
appear in S ′ and is not redundant for SS ρ . In any case, Bueno and Garcı́a de la
Banda (2004) have shown that classical applications of sharing analyses, such as
parallelization of logic programs, are able to exploit information which is encoded
in Sharing × Free but not in SS ρ × Free.
An alternative presentation of Sharing × Lin, based on set logic programs, has
been introduced by Codish et al. (2000). However, the proposed operators are not
optimal, as shown in Hill et al. 2004.
The domain ShLin2 is introduced by King (1994), which provides correct operators for abstract unification. However, these operators are not optimal, as Examples
5.13 and 5.14 show.
7.3 ASub
An alternative approach to aliasing analysis is to only record sharing between pairs
of variables (and possibly linearity and groundness information). The best known
38
G. Amato and F. Scozzari
domain of this category is ASub, introduced by Søndergaard (1986) and formalized
by Codish et al. (1991). The domain ASub is the reduced product of pair-sharing, Lin
and Con (Jones and Søndergaard 1987), which is the simplest domain for definite
groundness. Recently, King (2000) reformulated the proofs in order to work with
rational trees. Moreover, King’s algorithms are parametric w.r.t. the groundness
domain, allowing to replace Con with more precise domains such as Def and Pos.
The domain Sharing × Lin is strictly more precise than ASub, since it embeds
more groundness information (equivalent to Def) and set-sharing information. Since
our operator for Sharing × Lin is optimal, we are sure that the analyses performed
in Sharing × Lin are strictly more precise than those in ASub.
The following is a counterexample to the optimality of the abstract unification
in (King 2000), in the case of finite trees, when pair sharing is equipped with Def
or Pos.
Example 7.1
Consider the object κ = (x ↔ y, {xy}) where the first component is a formula of Def
and Pos and {xy} is the set of pairs of variables which may possibly share. In this
domain, linearity information is embedded in the second component in the following
way: if v is not linear, then vv must be included in the second component. Thus, both
x, y and z are linear in (x ↔ y, {xy}). We want to unify κ with x/f (y, z). By using
the algorithm (King 2000), we obtain (y ↔ x∧x → z, {xy, xz, yz, xx, yy}). However,
in Sharing × Lin we may represent κ with [S, L, U ] = [{xy, z}, {x, y, z}, {x, y, z}]
and mgusl ([S, L, U ], x/f (y, z)) = [{xy}, {z}, {x, y, z}] which proves that z is ground.
Actually, King (2000) does not state explicitly how to compute the groundness
component of the result, although he says that it must be computed before the
linearity and pair-sharing components, in order to improve precision. However, it
seems safe to assume that the author’s intention was to compute the groundness
component using the abstract operators already known, and therefore independently from the pair sharing component. This is what makes our operator more
precise, since linearity information may help in tracking ground variables when
working over finite trees.
7.3.1 Alternating paths
The domain ASub and its derivatives (King 2000) use the concept of alternating
path. Alternating paths may seem the counterparts, for pair-sharing, of sharing
graphs. We now investigate this idea, and show to what extent this correspondence
is faithful.
We call carrier graph a special graph defined by a set of equations E. Each
distinct occurrence of a variable in E is a node. Edges in the carrier graphs can be
of two types:
• edges of type one between two variable occurrences if the occurrences are on
opposite sides of a single equation in E,
39
On the interaction between sharing and linearity
• edges of type two linking two (distinct) occurrences of the same variable.
An alternating path is a sequence of edges of alternating type over the carrier graph.
Alternating paths in ASub (and derivatives) are used to prove correctness of
the abstract unification operators. For example, they are used to prove Prop. 3.1
in (King 2000). Sharing graphs are used in this paper to prove Theorem 4.31,
which is the starting point to prove correctness and optimality of the unification
algorithms for ShLin2 and ShLin. However, sharing graphs are also used to compute
the abstract unification in ShLinω . Even if alternating paths are not used, in the
literature, for computing abstract unification, they could. For any object of pairsharing o, which is a set of pairs of variables, consider any substitution θ in the
concretization of o. Then, the object o is an abstraction of the set of alternating
paths in θ. More precisely, it represents all the paths which start and end with edges
of type one, which we call admissible paths. They are abstracted by considering only
the start and end variables. In order to unify o with the binding x/t, we build a
carrier graph with all the occurrences of variables in o and x/t. For each pair of
variables in o, we add an edge of type one. We add edges of type one and two for
the binding x/t, as explained above. Finally, we add all the type two edges between
any occurrence in x/t and any occurrence of the same variable in o. We consider
all the admissible paths over the graph so obtained. It is not difficult to check that
the result of the unification algorithm for pair-sharing in (King 2000), without any
additional groundness domain, is the set of all the start and end variables for all
these admissible paths.
Example 7.2
Let S = {xv} be the set of pairs of variables which share, and consider the binding
x/r(y, y). We obtain the carrier graph:
y
x?
??
??1
??
1
1
v
x
2
2
y
which gives origin to several alternating paths. Among them, there is an admissible
path from v to v, which proves that v is not linear after the unification.
The first difference between alternating paths and sharing graphs is that all the
alternating paths are subgraphs of the same carrier graph, while each sharing graph
has a different structure, with a different set of nodes. The second difference is that
the information coming from the abstract object and the binding is encoded in a
different way. For instance, consider the set S = {xy} and the binding x/z. We
obtain a carrier graph with 4 nodes x, y, x, z, two edges x
2
1
y and x
1
z
x of type two. Therefore, the sharing information
of type one, and an edge x
coming from the initial pair-sharing and the binding is treated symmetrically, and
40
G. Amato and F. Scozzari
is entirely encoded on the edges. Performing unification on the carrier graph boils
down to devising the alternating paths on the graph. On the contrary, each sharing
graph has a set of nodes labelled by xy, x and z, with suitable multiplicities. The
labels of the nodes encode the initial pair-sharing information, while the binding
affects the multiplicity of nodes. The process of unification consists of adding the
necessary arrows to get a sharing graph.
If we consider a single alternating path in a carrier graph and the sharing graph
for the same pair-sharing information and the same binding, they are obviously
related, although not in a straightforward manner. Consider an admissible path
and delete all type two edges, collapsing in a single node their start and end nodes
(type two edges are used in the carrier graph to avoid the creation of invalid paths,
but in a single alternating path they do not add information). Then, each type one
edge coming from the initial pair-sharing information corresponds to a node in the
sharing graph, while a type one edge coming from the binding becomes an arrow
in the sharing graph.
Example 7.3
Consider Example 7.2. We depict the (admissible) alternating path from v to v, its
collapsed version and the corresponding sharing graph.
v
v
1
2
x
1
x
x
✞
☎
0
xv
✝
✆
1
1
y
2
1
y
1
1
y
/
✞
✝
y
x
☎
2
o
✆
0
2
x
1
v
x
1
v
✞
☎
0
xv
✝
✆
1
Note that, while in the carrier graph, non-linearity of the variable x is handled by
duplicating the variable y which occurs twice, in alternating paths without type
two nodes, the duplicated variables are x and v, which are connected to y. The
same holds in the sharing graph, where we have only one node labeled by y and
two nodes labelled by xv.
In sharing graphs we also require the multiplicities of a node to be equal to
its in- and out-degrees. This makes possible to handle groundness at the same
level of sharing and linearity, without requiring a separate domain. Remember that
a sharing group S with multiplicity n corresponds, in the concrete domain, to
a variable u such that θ−1 (u) = S. If the degree of the node labeled with this
sharing group is not n, this means that one of the occurrences of u is bound to a
ground term. This would make ground the entire connected component containing
S. Hence, in order to correctly and precisely propagate groundness, we just forbid
this kind of sharing graphs. On the contrary, the pair-sharing algorithm in (King
2000), which focus on a single path in the carrier graph, is not able to extract
groundness information without the help of an auxiliary domain.
On the interaction between sharing and linearity
41
7.4 Lagoon and Stuckey’s domain
Lagoon and Stuckey (2002) have recently proposed a different approach to pairsharing analysis. The authors use multigraphs, called relation graphs, to represent
sharing and linearity information. The nodes of the multigraph are variables, and
two of them may share only if there is a traversable path from one variable to the
other. Intuitively, each binding generates edges of different types. The definition of
traversable paths is very similar to that of alternating paths. A traversable path is
a sequence of edges, such that contiguous edges are always of different types.
This domain should be coupled with a groundness domain, and operators are
parametric w.r.t. the latter one. The authors show that relation graphs, when coupled with the Def groundness domain, are more precise than Sharing and ASub.
However, this is not the case for Sharing × Lin, at least in the case of finite trees,
since the operators in (Lagoon and Stuckey 2002) are not able to use linearity to
improve the precision of the groundness component.
Example 7.4
As shown in Example 7.1, if we unify [S, L, U ] = [{xy, z}, {x, y, z}, {x, y, z}] with
the binding x/f (y, z), we obtain mgusl ([S, L, U ], x/f (y, z)) = [{xy}, {z}, {x, y, z}],
proving that z is ground after the unification. In the domains ΩDef and ΩPos of
(Lagoon and Stuckey 2002), the abstract object corresponding to [S, L, U ] is
y ,x ↔ y .
µ1 = x
Intuitively, the first element of µ1 encodes the sharing information, namely, that x
and y may share (while z does not share neither with x nor with y). The second
element of µ1 is an element of Pos (and also of Def) and denotes the groundness
information that x is ground if and only if y is ground.
The unification of µ1 with x/f (y, z) in ΩPos is realized by abstracting the substitution and composing the two abstract object. The abstraction of x/f (y, z) is
y
µ2 = x @
, x ↔ (y ∧ z) ,
@@
@@
@@
z
The first element says that x shares with both y and z, while y and z do not share.
The second element says that x is ground if and only if both y and z are ground.
The abstract conjunction is
y
, (x ↔ y) ∧ (x → z) ,
µ1 f µ2 = x @
@@
@@
@@
z
42
G. Amato and F. Scozzari
where edges drawn in different styles are compatible, namely, that they come from
different bindings. From this result, it is not possible to infer that z is ground after
the unification.
In the actual implementation, Lagoon and Stuckey (2002) use another representation for their domain. Each pair of variables is annotated with a formula denoting
the groundness models under which the corresponding pair-sharing may occur. For
example, a pair uv annotated with the formula ū ∧ v̄ ∧ w̄ ∧ z̄ means that u and
v may share only if none of u, v, w, z is ground. We conjecture that this domain
may be embedded in King’s ShLin2 . The next example shows how to perform this
embedding.
Example 7.5
We consider the example in Figure 4 in (Lagoon and Stuckey 2002). The variables
of interest are u, v, w, z.
uw
vz
uv
wz
:
:
:
:
ū ∧ w̄
v̄ ∧ z̄
ū ∧ v̄ ∧ w̄ ∧ z̄
w̄ ∧ z̄
uz
uu
vv
vw
:
:
:
:
ū ∧ z̄
ū ∧ w̄ ∧ z̄
v̄ ∧ w̄ ∧ z̄
v̄ ∧ w̄
For instance, uv : ū ∧ v̄ ∧ w̄ ∧ z̄ means that u and v may share only if u, v, w, z are
not ground, while uu : ū ∧ w̄ ∧ z̄ means that u is (possibly) not linear only if u, w, z
are not ground. Each of these formulas may be viewed as a condition over 2-sharing
groups. For example uv : ū ∧ v̄ ∧ w̄ ∧ z̄ means that every 2-sharing group which
contains u and v should also contain w and z, while uu : ū ∧ w̄ ∧ z̄ means that each
2-sharing group where u is non-linear should also contain w and z. In order to find
the object of ShLin2 which corresponds to this example, it is enough to collect all
the 2-sharing groups which satisfy all the conditions enforced by the formulas. In
this case, we get ↓{u∞ v ∞ wz, u∞ wz, v ∞ wz, uw, vz, wz, uz, vw, u, v, w, z}.
7.4.1 Traversable paths
The idea behind traversable paths is very similar to the concept of alternating path
and relation graphs are quite similar to carrier graphs. From a carrier graph, we
can obtain a relation graph by removing type two edges and introducing a different
type of edge for each binding. This works because the use of non-linear terms is
forbidden: a binding like x/r(y, y) has to be replaced by two bindings x/r(y, z) and
y/z. However, the main difference w.r.t. traditional pair-sharing (and also ShLinω )
is that Lagoon and Stuckey (2002) do not abstract traversable paths to set of pairs
of variables, but they keep in the abstract object the set of all the edges generated
during the unification process. In this way, they are able to record that, in order
for two variables x and y to share, the only possible path touches another variable
z. Hence, if z is ground, x and y cannot share: in this way they recover pair sharing
dependence information which would be lost otherwise.
We could follow the same approach and use multilayer sharing graphs (namely,
sets of sharing graphs over the same set of nodes, where each layer represents the
On the interaction between sharing and linearity
43
unification with a single binding) as abstract objects, without collapsing them to
sharing groups. We do not think this would improve precision of the domain very
much, since a sharing group is already a much more concrete abstraction of a graph
w.r.t. the set of all the connected pairs of variables. In fact, already Sharing can
encode the information that, grounding a certain variable z, two variables x and
y become independent. Moreover, in the Example 7.5 we have shown that relation
graphs may be encoded into ShLin2 .
7.5 Rational trees
In the recent years, many authors have studied the behavior of logic programs on
rational trees (King 2000; Hill et al. 2004), which formalize the standard implementations of logic languages. We have shown that our operators, which are optimal for
finite trees, are not correct for rational trees, since they exploit the occur-check to
reduce the sharing groups generated by the abstract unification (see Example 5.17).
It would be interesting to adapt our framework to work with rational trees, in order
to obtain optimal operators also in this case. Since a rational tree may contain infinite occurrences of a variable, the notion of ω-sharing group needs to be extended in
order to allow infinite exponents. Also, we need to consider infinite sharing graphs
(or, at least, a representation of them) and find suitable regularity conditions for
them, analogously to the regularity conditions on rational trees.
Example 7.6
Consider the set of ω-sharing groups S = {xy, z} and the binding x/r(z, y). On
rational trees, unifying δ = {x/y} (such that [S]xyz 3 [δ]xyz ) with x/r(z, y) would
get the substitution {x/r(z, x), y/r(z, y)} in rational solved form. This, intuitively,
corresponds to the sharing group xω y ω z where the exponent ω denotes an infinite
number of occurrences. A possible (infinite) sharing graph generating this sharing
group is the following:
☎
✞
☎
✞
☎
✞
☎
✞
1
1
1
1
/ xy
/ xy
/ z
/ xy
···
✝
✆
✝
✆
✝
✆
✝
✆
0
1
1
1
Although the structure of abstract objects and operators for adapting ShLinω to
work with rational trees is more complex, we expect the optimal abstract operators
for rational trees on ShLin2 and Sharing × Lin to be simpler than those presented
here for finite trees. This is because we do not need to worry about the occur-check
condition (embedded in our unification operator) and infinite multiplicities.
8 Conclusion and Future Works
We summarize the main results of this paper:
• We define a new domain ShLinω as a general framework for investigating
sharing and linearity properties and provide the optimal unification operator.
44
G. Amato and F. Scozzari
• We show that ShLinω is a useful starting point for studying further abstractions. We obtain the optimal operators for single binding abstract unification
in Sharing×Lin and ShLin2 , and we show that these are strictly more precise
than all the other operators in the literature for the same domains.
• We show, for the first time, an optimality result for a domain which combines
aliasing and linearity information.
Moreover, as a negative result, we prove that the standard schema of the iterative
unification algorithm (one binding at a time) does not lead to optimal operators
for the domains ShLin2 and Sharing × Lin. As a side result, we show that ShLin
and ShLin2 with optimal operators may be more precise than Pos for groundness
analysis.
Several things remain to be explored: first of all, we need to study the impact on
the precision and performance obtained by adopting the new optimal operators and
domains. We plan to implement the operators on ShLin2 and Sharing× Lin within
the CiaoPP static analyzer (Bueno et al. 1997). Moreover, we plan to analyze the
domain SS ρ × Lin (Bagnara et al. 2002) in our framework and, possibly, to devise
a variant of ShLin2 which enjoys a similar closure property for redundant sharing
groups. This could be of great impact on the efficiency of the analysis. Last but not
least, we plan to translate our framework to the case of unification over rational
trees.
A Proofs of Section 4
In this section we give the proofs of the main results of the paper.
Theorem 4.6
The relation 3 is well defined.
Proof
It is enough to prove that {θ1 −1 (v)|U | v ∈ V} = {θ2 −1 (v)|U | v ∈ V} when
θ1 ∼U θ2 . Assume that θ1 ∼U θ2 , then by definition of ∼U there exists a renaming
ρ such that ρ(θ1 (u)) = θ2 (u) for each u ∈ U . Given S = θ1−1 (v)|U , if w = ρ(v) we
have θ2−1 (w)|U = θ1−1 (v)|U = S. This concludes the proof.
Proposition 4.13
Given a substitution θ, a variable v and a term t, we have that χ(θ−1 (v), t) =
occ(v, θ(t)). Moreover, given a set of variables U , when vars(t) ⊆ U , it holds that
χ(θ−1 (v)|U , t) = occ(v, θ(t)).
Proof
Let B = θ−1 (v). The proof is by induction on the structure of the term t. If
t ≡ a is a constant, then occ(v, θ(a)) = occ(v, a) = 0 which is equal to χ(B, a)
since occ(w, a) = 0 for each w ∈ V. If t ≡ w is a variable, then occ(v, θ(w)) =
θ−1 (v)(w) = B(w). At the same time, χ(B, t) = B(w) since occ(w, w) = 1 and
45
On the interaction between sharing and linearity
occ(y, w) = 0 for y 6≡ w. For the inductive case, if t ≡ f (t1 , . . . , tn ), we have
Pn
Pn
occ(v, t) = i=1 occ(v, ti ) = i=1 χ(B, ti ) by inductive hypothesis. Moreover
χ(B, t) =
X
(B(v) ·
n
X
occ(v, ti )) =
B(v) · occ(v, ti ) =
n
X
χ(B, ti ) .
i=1
i=1 v∈TBU
i=1
v∈TBU
n
X
X
Let U be a set of variables with vars(t) ⊆ U . By definition, χ(θ−1 (v)|U , t) =
P
/ U it holds that occ(w, t) = 0,
w∈θ −1 (v)|U occ(w, t). Since vars(t) ⊆ U , for any w ∈
and thus χ(θ−1 (v)|U , t) = χ(θ−1 (v), t).
Proposition 4.24
Given substitutions θ, η ∈ ISubst and an ω-sharing group B, we have
(η ◦ θ)−1 (B) = θ−1 (η −1 (B)) .
Proof
Using the definitions and simple algebraic manipulations, we have
θ−1 (η −1 (B))
=
=
λw.χ λv.χ(B, η(v)), θ(w)
X
λw.
χ(B, η(y)) · occ(y, θ(w))
y
=
λw.
X X
y
=
λw.
X
B(x) · occ(x, η(y))
x
B(x) ·
x
=
λw.
X
x
=
λw.
X
!
X
· occ(y, θ(w))
occ(x, η(y)) · occ(y, θ(w))
y
B(x) ·
X
η −1 (x)(y) · occ(y, θ(w))
y
B(x) · χ(η −1 (x), θ(w)) .
x
By Prop. 4.13, we have that χ(η −1 (x), θ(w)) = occ(x, η(θ(w)) and therefore
θ−1 (η −1 (B)) = (η ◦ θ)−1 (B) .
Theorem 4.25 (Correctness of mguω )
The operation mguω is correct w.r.t. mgu, i.e.,
∀[S]U ∈ ShLinω , δ ∈ ISubst. [S]U 3 [θ]U =⇒ mguω ([S]U , δ) 3 mgu([θ]U , δ) .
Proof
Given [S]U 3[θ]U and δ ∈ ISubst, we need to prove that mguω ([S]U , δ)3mgu([θ]U , δ)
or the equivalent property αω (mgu([θ]U , δ)) ≤ω mguω ([S]U , δ).
Since mguω is defined inductively on the number of bindings in δ, it is enough to
prove that mguω ([S]U , x/t) 3 mgu([θ]U , {x/t}) for a single binding x/t. Since composition of correct operators is still correct, it follows that multi-binding unification
is correct.
46
G. Amato and F. Scozzari
Moreover, when vars(x/t) 6⊆ U , we exploit the identity mgu([θ]U , {x/t}) =
mgu(mgu([θ]U , [ǫ]vars(x/t) ), {x/t}). When computing mgu([θ]U , [ǫ]vars(x/t) ) all the
variables in vars(x/t) \ U occurring in θ are renamed apart from x/t itself. Therefore each v ∈ vars(x/t) \ U is free (hence linear) in mgu([θ]U , [ǫ]vars(x/t) ), i.e.,
αω (mgu([θ]U , [ǫ]vars(x/t) )) = [S ∪ {{{v}} | v ∈ vars(x/t) \ U }]U∪vars(x/t) .
Therefore, it is enough to prove that mguω ([S]U , x/t) 3 mgu([θ]U , {x/t}) when
vars(x/t) ⊆ U . Let B be a sharing group in αω (mgu([θ]U , {x/t})), we prove that
B ∈ mguω ([S]U , x/t).
If B = {{}}, we consider a multigraph G with only one node labelled by {{}} and
no edges. It is easy to check that G is a sharing graph for S (since {{}} ∈ S) and
x/t, and that res(G) = {{}}. Therefore, in the following we consider only the case
B 6= {{}}.
The proof is composed of three parts: first, we look for a (special) substitution β
obtained by renaming some variables in θ and such that β is still approximated by
S; second, we define a multigraph G exploiting the variables of β; third, we show
that we can restrict G to a smaller sharing graph whose resultant ω-sharing group
is exactly B.
First part. Without loss of generality, we assume that dom(θ) = U (this is
always possible since, in any class [θ]U , there exists a substitution whose domain
is exactly U ). Let θ′ = mgu(θ, {x/t}) = η ◦ θ with η = mgu({θ(x) = θ(t)}) and
we have [θ′ ]U = mgu([θ]U , [x/t]U ). Since dom(θ) = U , we have vars(η) ∩ U = ∅.
Consider η ′ obtained from η by replacing each occurrence of a variable in rng(η)
with a different fresh variable. This means that there exists ρ ∈ Subst mapping
variables to variables such that ρ(η ′ (x)) = η(x) for each x ∈ dom(η). Namely, we
have
ρ = {v1 /v2 | ∃x ∈ dom(η), ξ ∈ Ξ s.t. η ′ (x)(ξ) = v1 ∧ η(x)(ξ) = v2 } .
Note that ρ is not a renaming, since it is not bijective. We now show that β = η ′ ◦ θ
has the property that [S]U 3 [β]U . For any C ∈ α([β]U ), we may distinguish three
cases:
• C = {{}}. In this case C ∈ S by definition of ShLinω ;
• C = β −1 (w)|U for w ∈ rng(θ) \ dom(η). In this case occ(w, (η ′ ◦ θ)(v)) =
occ(w, θ(v)) for each v ∈ V, therefore β −1 (w)|U = θ−1 (w)|U ∈ S;
• C = β −1 (w)|U for w ∈ rng(η ′ ). Hence there exists v ∈ rng(θ) such that
occ(w, η ′ (v)) = 1 and occ(w, η ′ (v ′ )) = 0 for each v ′ ∈
/ {v ′ , w}. Hence, for
each u ∈ U , occ(w, η ′ (θ(u))) = n iff occ(v, θ(u)) = n and this implies C =
θ−1 (v)|U ∈ S.
Moreover ρ(β(u)) = θ′ (u) for each u ∈ U , therefore θ′ ∼U ρ ◦ β.
Second part. Consider the labelled multigraph G such that NG = {v | v ∈
vars(β(U ))}, lG (v) = β −1 (v)|U ∈ S and EG = {ξ | β(x)(ξ) ∈ V}. Note that if
β(x)(ξ) ∈ V, then β(t)(ξ) ∈ V, too. Each position ξ in EG is an arrow such that
srcG (ξ) = β(x)(ξ) and tgtG (ξ) = β(t)(ξ). Observe that the second condition in the
definition of sharing graph for S and x/t is satisfied, since [S]U 3 [β]U .
On the interaction between sharing and linearity
47
Let us check the third condition. For each node v ∈ NG , if χ(β −1 (v)|U , x) = n by
Prop. 4.13 we have occ(v, β(x)) = n, i.e., there are n positions in β(x) corresponding
to v. Therefore the outdegree of v is n. In the same way, we have that χ(β −1 (v)|U , t)
is the in-degree of v.
Third part. Given B = θ′−1 (u)|U , by Prop. 4.24 we have B = β −1 (ρ−1 (u))|U .
Since θ′ U β U θ, then [θ′ ]U = mgu([β]U , {x/t}) = [mgu(β, {x/t})]U . Therefore
ρ ◦ β ′ ∼U θ′ = mgu(θ, {x/t}) ∼U mgu(β, {x/t}) = mgu(β(x) = β(t)) ◦ β. We call δ
the result of mgu(β(x) = β(t)), and note that β(x) = β(t) is equivalent to the set of
equations X = {v1 = v2 | there is a position ξ such that β(x)(ξ) = v1 ∧ β(t)(ξ) =
v2 }. The relation ρ ◦ β ∼U δ ◦ β means that, if w1 , w2 ∈ β(U ) and ρ(w1 ) = ρ(w2 )
then δ(w1 ) = δ(w2 ). The latter implies that there are in X equations of the kind
x1 = x2 , x2 = x3 , . . . , xn−1 = xn with x1 = w1 and xn = w2 , i.e., that w1 and w2
are connected in the graph G.
Therefore, let Y = {w | ρ(w) = u} = Tρ−1 (u)U. This is not empty, since B 6= {{}}.
If ξ is an edge such that srcG (ξ) ∈ Y , then tgtG (ξ) ∈ Y , since β(x)(ξ) = β(t)(ξ) ∈
X. The converse also holds. Hence, if we restrict the graph G to the set of nodes Y ,
U
we obtain a sharing graph whose resultant ω-sharing group is w∈Y β −1 (w)|U =
β −1 (ρ−1 (u))|U = B.
Theorem 4.28 (Optimality of mguω )
The single binding unification mguω ([S]U , x/t) is optimal w.r.t. mgu, under the
assumption that vars(x/t) ⊆ U , i.e., :
∀B ∈ mguω ([S]U , x/t) ∃δ ∈ ISubst. [S]U 3 [δ]U and B ∈ αω (mgu([δ]U , {x/t})) .
Proof
Let X ∈ mguω (S, x/t). By definition of mguω , there exists a sharing graph G such
that X ∈ res(G). Let NG = {n1 , . . . , nk }. We want to define a substitution δ such
that [S]U 3 [δ]U and X ∈ αω (mgu([δ]U , {x/t})). If X = {{}} this is trivial, hence
we assume that X 6= {{}}. The structure of the proof is as follows: first, we define a
substitution δ which unifies with x/t; second, we show that δ is approximated by
[S]U , namely, [S]U 3 [δ]U ; third, we show that X ∈ αω (mgu([δ]U , {x/t})).
First part. We now define a substitution δ which unifies with x/t. For each node
n ∈ NG we consider a fresh variable wn and we denote by W the set of all these
new variables.
P
For any y ∈ U \ {x} we define a term ty of arity n∈NG lG (n)(y) as follows:
ty = r(wn1 , . . . , wn1 , wn2 , . . . , wn2 , . . . , wnk , . . . , wnk )
{z
} |
{z
}
|
|
{z
}
lG (n1 )(y) times lG (n2 )(y) times
lG (nk )(y) times
We know that there exists a map f : EG → V such that, for each variable y
and node n, the set of edges targeted at n and labelled with y by f is exactly
lG (n)(y) · occ(y, t). Namely, we require
|{e ∈ EG | f (e) = y ∧ tgtG (e) = n}| = lG (n)(y) · occ(y, t) .
The idea is that each edge targeted at the node n is actually targeted at one of
48
G. Amato and F. Scozzari
the specific variables in lG (n). In particular, each variable y ∈ TlG (n)U should have
exactly lG (n)(y) · occ(y, t) edges targeted at it, so that the total number of edges
P
pointing n is y∈U lG (n)(y) · occ(y, t) = χ(lG (n), t), i.e., the in-degree of n. The
map f chooses, for each edge targeted at n, a variable in lG (n) according to the
previous idea.
Now, for each node n and variable y ∈ U , we denote by Mn,y the set of edges
pointing at y in n, i.e., Mn,y = {e ∈ EG | tgtG (e) = n ∧ f (e) = y}. Thus Mn,y may
be partitioned in occ(y, t) sets of lG (n)(y) elements, denoted by Mn,y,ξ such that
∪{Mn,y,ξ | t(ξ) = y} = Mn,y .
We may define some variations of the terms ty by replacing the variables occurring
in them with those in the set Mn,y,l . In particular, for y ∈ U \{x} and any occurrence
P
ξ of a variable y in t, we define the term tyξ of arity n∈NG lG (n)(y) as
tyξ = r(w(Mn1 ,y,ξ ), w(Mn2 ,y,ξ ), . . . , w(Mnk ,y,ξ )) ,
where, if M = {e1 , . . . , eq }, we define w(M ) as the sequence wn′1 , . . . , wn′q where
n′j = srcEG (ej ).
Note that ty and tyξ have, in corresponding positions, variables related to nodes
which are connected through edges. We are now ready to define the substitution δ
in the following way:
• δ(x) is the same as t with the difference that each occurrence ξ of a variable
y ∈ t is replaced by the term tyξ ;
• for y ∈ U \ {x} then δ(y) = ty ;
• in all the other cases, i.e v ∈
/ U , δ(v) = v.
Second part. Now we show that [S]U 3[δ]U . We need to consider all the variables
v ∈ V and check that δ −1 (v)|U ∈ S. We distinguish several cases.
• If we choose the variable wn for some n ∈ N , by construction occ(wn , ty ) =
lG (n)(y). Moreover, since G is a sharing graph, there are lG (n)(x) edges in E
departing from n and targeted to nodes m such that χ(lG (m), t) 6= 0. Thus
P
y∈vars(t),m∈NG |{e ∈ Mm,y |srcEG (e) = n}| = lG (n)(x) and occ(δ(x), wn ) =
lG (n)(x). Since for each v ∈ U we have that occ(δ(v), wn ) = lG (n)(v), we
obtain the required result which is δ −1 (wn )|U = lG (n) ∈ S.
• If we choose a variable v ∈ U then v ∈ dom(δ) and δ −1 (v) = {{}} ∈ S.
• Finally, if v ∈
/ U ∪ W , then δ −1 (v) = {{v}} and δ −1 (v)|U = {{}} ∈ S.
Third part. We now show that X ∈ αω (mgu([δ]U , {x/t})). By definition of mgu
over ISubst ∼ , we have that mgu([δ]U , {x/t}) = [mgu(δ, {x/t})]U . We obtain:
η =mgu(δ, {x/t}) =
{x/t} ◦ mgu {y = ty | y ∈ U \ {x}} ∪ {y = tyξ | t(ξ) = y} =
{x/t} ◦ {y/ty | y ∈ U \ {x}} ◦ mgu{ty =
tyξ
(A1)
| t(ξ) = y} .
Let F be the set of equations {ty = tyj | t(j) = y}. We show that, for any edge
n → m ∈ EG , it follows from F that wn = wm . Since n → m ∈ EG , then for some
y ∈ vars(t) it holds that f (n → m) = y. This implies that n → m ∈ Mm,y and
49
On the interaction between sharing and linearity
therefore there exists a position ξ such that n → m ∈ Mm,y,ξ . By definition of tyξ ,
it means that wn ∈ vars(tyξ ), in the same position where wm occurs in ty , hence
wn = wm follows from ty = tyξ ∈ F .
We know that G is connected, hence for any n, m ∈ NG , the set of equations in
F implies wn = wm . We choose a particular node n̄ ∈ NG and, for what we said
before, we have mgu(F ) = {wn /wn̄ | n ∈ NG \ {n̄}}. We show that η −1 (wn̄ )|U = X.
η −1 (wn̄ )|U
= {x/t}−1 ({y/ty | y ∈ U \ {x}}−1 ({{wn1 , . . . , wnk }}))|U
X
= {x/t}−1 ({{wn1 , . . . , wnk }} ⊎ λy ∈ U \ {x}.
lG (n)(y))|U
X
= λy ∈ U \ {x}.
P
lG (n)(y) ⊎ {{x
y∈V
n∈NG
P
occ(y,t)·
n∈NG
lG (n)(y)
}}
n∈NG
X
= λy ∈ U \ {x}.
P
lG (n)(y) ⊎ {{x
n∈NG
χ(lG (n),t)
}} .
n∈NG
Since G is a sharing graph, the total out-degree
P
total in-degree n∈NG χ(lG (n), x). Hence
P
n∈NG
χ(lG (n), t), is equal to the
η −1 (wn̄ )|U
= λy ∈ U \ {x}.
X
P
lG (n)(y) ⊎ {{x
n∈NG
χ(lG (n),x)
}}
n∈NG
= λy ∈ U.
X
lG (n)(y)
n∈NG
= res(G) .
This concludes the proof.
Theorem 4.30 (Optimality of mguω with extension)
The single binding unification mguω with extension is optimal w.r.t. mgu.
Proof
Let S ′ = S ∪ {{{v}} | v ∈ vars(x/t) \ U }, V = U ∪ vars(x/t) and X ∈ mguω (S ′ , x/t).
We want to find [δ]U such that [S]U 3 [δ]U and X ∈ αω (mgu([δ]U , {x/t})).
Following the previous theorem, we find δ such that X ∈ αω (mgu([δ]V , {x/t}))
and [S ′ ]V 3 [δ]V . We want to prove that [S]U 3 [δ]U and αω (mgu([δ]V , {x/t})) ≤ω
αω (mgu([δ]U , {x/t})), so that [δ]U is the existential substitutions we are looking
for.
We first show that [S]U 3 [δ]U . Let v ∈ V. Since [S ′ ]V 3 [δ]V , it follows that
−1
δ (v)|V ∈ S ′ .
• If δ −1 (v)|V ∈ S, then δ −1 (v)|V = δ −1 (v)|U , since vars(S) ⊆ U , and thus
δ −1 (v)|U ∈ S.
• If δ −1 (v)|V ∈
/ S, then δ −1 (v)|V ∈ {{{v}} | v ∈ vars(x/t) \ U }. Then δ −1 (v)|U =
{{}} ∈ S.
50
G. Amato and F. Scozzari
Now we distinguish two cases: either x ∈ U or x ∈
/ U.
If x ∈ U , with the same considerations which led to (A1), we have
mgu({x/t}, δ) = mgu({x = t} ∪ Eq(δ|U ) ∪ Eq(δ|V \U )) =
= mgu({x = t} ∪ Eq(δ|U ) ∪ {y = ty | y ∈ vars(t) \ U }
For each y ∈ vars(t) \ U there exist a position ξy such that t(ξy ) = y and
{x/t} ∪ Eq(δ|U ) ∪ {y = ty } is equivalent to {x/t} ∪ Eq(δ|U ) ∪ {tyξy = ty }. Note that,
since y ∈
/ U , then ty (which is actually δ(y)) is linear and independent from x/t
and the other bindings in δ. Therefore
mgu({x = t} ∪ Eq(δ|U ) ∪ {y = ty | y ∈ vars(t) \ U }
=mgu({x = t} ∪ Eq(δ|U ) ∪ {tyξy = ty | y ∈ vars(t) \ U }
=mgu({x = t} ∪ Eq(δ|U )) ⊎ β ′
where β ′ = mgu({tyξy = ty | y ∈ vars(t) \ U }) and dom(β ′ ) = vars({ty | y ∈
vars(t) \ U }). It follows that
αω ([mgu({x = t} ∪ Eq(δ|U )) ⊎ β ′ ]V )
=αω ([mgu({x = t} ∪ Eq(δ|U ))]V )
=αω (mgu([δ]U , {x/t})) .
If x ∈
/ U , then
mgu({x/t}, δ) = mgu({x = t} ∪ Eq(δ|U ) ∪ Eq(δ|vars(t)\U ) ∪ Eq(δ|{x} )
=mgu({x = t} ∪ Eq(δ|U ) ∪ {y = ty | y ∈ vars(t) \ U }∪
{ty = tyξ | t(ξ) = y}
Note that x appears in S ′ only in the multiset {{x}}. Moreover, if n is a node labelled
by {{x}}, there is only one edge which departs from n and there are no edges which
arrive in n. This means that
• wn does not appear in any ty for y ∈ V \ {x},
• δ(x) is linear since given edges e 6= e′ , we have that srcEG (e) 6= srcEG (e′ ).
As a result, δ(x) is linear and does not share variables with x/t or the other bindings
in δ. The last formula may be rewritten as
mgu({x = t} ∪ Eq(δ|U ) ∪ {y = ty | y ∈ vars(t) \ U }) ⊎ β
where β is a substitution such that dom(β) = vars(δ(x)) ⊆ W . It is obvious that
αω ([mgu({x = t} ∪ Eq(δ|U ) ∪ {y = ty | y ∈ vars(t) \ U }) ⊎ β]V )
= αω ([mgu({x = t} ∪ Eq(δ|U ) ∪ {y = ty | y ∈ vars(t) \ U })]V ) .
since dom(β) ∩ V = ∅.
On the interaction between sharing and linearity
51
Let U1 = vars(t) \ U , then
mgu({x = t} ∪ Eq(δ|U ) ∪ Eq(δ|U1 ))
=δ|U ◦ mgu(δ|U ({x = t} ∪ Eq(δ|U1 )))
=δ|U ◦ mgu({x = δ|U (t)}) ∪ Eq(δ|U1 )))
[since vars(δ|U1 ) ∩ vars(δ|U ) = ∅ and x 6∈ vars(δ|U1 )]
=δ|U ◦ {x/δ|U (t)} ◦ δ|U1
[since {x} ∈
/ vars(δ|U1 )]
Note that δ|U ◦ {x/δ|U (t)} is mgu(δ|U , {x/t}). We call γ = δ|U ◦ {x/δ|U (t)} and we
prove that αω ([γ]V ) ≥ω αω ([γ ◦ δ|U1 ]V ).
Consider a variable v ∈ V. If v ∈
/ vars(δ|U1 ) there is nothing to prove. If
v ∈ rng(δ|U1 ) we know that v does not occur anywhere else in δ|U1 and γ. Then
(γ ◦ δ|U1 )−1 (v) = γ −1 ({{y, v}}) = γ −1 (y) ⊎ {{v}} for the unique y such that v ∈
/ V , the sharing group over V we obtain in
vars(δ|U1 (y)). Therefore, since v ∈
γ ◦ δ|U1 from v may be obtained in γ from the variable y. If v ∈ dom(δ|U1 ) then
(γ ◦ δ|U1 )−1 (v) = {{}} which occurs in every element of ShLinω .
Theorem 4.31
Let S be a set of ω-sharing groups and x/t be a binding. Then B ∈ mguω (S, x/t)
iff there exist n ∈ N+ , B1 , . . . , Bn ∈ S which satisfy the following conditions:
1. B = ⊎1≤i≤n Bi ,
P
P
2.
1≤i≤n χ(Bi , t) ≥ n − 1,
1≤i≤n χ(Bi , x) =
3. either n = 1 or ∀1 ≤ i ≤ n. χ(Bi , x) + χ(Bi , t) > 0.
Proof
We first prove that these conditions are necessary. Assume that B is a resultant
sharing group for S and x/t, obtained by the sharing graph G. We show that there
exist a finite set I and, for each i ∈ I, a multiset Bi ∈ S, which satisfy the above
conditions.
Take I = NG and Bi = lG (i) for each i ∈ I, so that B = ⊎i∈I Bi . Since then
in-degree of each node is χ(Bi , x), the sum of the in-degrees of all the nodes is
P
P
i∈I χ(Bi , t). Both of them must
i∈I χ(Bi , x) and the sum of the out-degree is
be equal to the number of edges in EG . Moreover, each connected graph with |I|
nodes has at least |I| − 1 edges. Finally, if a connected graph has more than one
node, then every node i has an adjacent edge. Therefore, either χ(Bi , x) or χ(Bi , t)
is not zero.
Now we prove that the conditions are sufficient. Let I = {1, . . . , n}. If n = 1 and
χ(Bi , x) + χ(Bi , t) = 0 for the only i ∈ I, simply consider a sharing graph with
a single node labelled with Bi and no edges. Otherwise, we partition the set I in
three parts:
• Nx = {i ∈ I | χ(Bi , x) = 0};
• Nt = {i ∈ I | χ(Bi , t) = 0};
• N = {i ∈ I | χ(Bi , x) 6= 0, χ(Bi , t) 6= 0};
52
G. Amato and F. Scozzari
Note that this is a partition of I since, by hypothesis, ∀i ∈ I. χ(Bi , x)+χ(Bi , t) > 0.
Now we define a connected labelled multigraph G whose sets of nodes is I and whose
labelling function is λi ∈ I.Bi . In order to define the edges, we distinguish two cases.
N 6= ∅: Let N = {b1 , . . . , bm } with m ≥ 1 and consider the set of edges:
{a → b1 | a ∈ Nt } ∪ {b1 → c | c ∈ Nx } ∪ {bi → bi+1 | i ∈ {1, . . . , m − 1}} .
N = ∅: If Nt = ∅, then also Nx = ∅ and there is nothing to prove. We assume that
Nt 6= ∅, and thus Nx 6= ∅. Let ā ∈ Nt , c̄ ∈ Nx and consider the set of edges:
{ā → c | c ∈ Nx } ∪ {a → c̄ | a ∈ Nt \ {ā}} .
Note that, in both cases, we obtain a multigraph with the following properties:
1. it is connected;
2. it has exactly n − 1 edges, i.e. it is a tree (if we do not consider the direction
of edges);
3. there is no edge targeted at a node i with χ(i, t) = 0 and no edge whose source
is a node i with χ(i, x) = 0.
In the rest of the proof, we call pre-sharing graph a multigraph which satisfies the
above properties.
If indeg(i) is the in-degree of a node and outdeg(i) the outdegree, we call unbalancement factor of the graph the value:
X
{outdeg(i) − χ(Bi , x) | i ∈ I, outdeg(i) > χ(Bi , x)}+
X
+
{indeg(i) − χ(Bi , t) | i ∈ I, indeg(i) > χ(Bi , t)} .
We prove that given a pre-sharing graph with unbalancement factor k, we can
build another pre-sharing graph with unbalancement factor strictly less then k. As
a result, there is a pre-sharing graph with unbalancement factor equal to zero.
Assume that the graph has unbalancement factor k. There is at least an unbalanced node. Assume without loss of generality that the unbalanced node is j and
P
that outdeg(j) > χ(Bj , x). Since i∈I χ(Bi , x) ≥ n − 1, there exists a node l such
that outdeg(l) < χ(Bl , x). Let e be the unique edge with source j such that, if we
remove e from the graph, l becomes disconnected from j. Since no edge starts from
a node i with χ(Bi , x) = 0, then χ(Bj , x) > 0. This means that outdeg(j) > 1
and there is at least another edge starting from j. Assume that it is e′ : j → j ′ .
Remove this edge and replace it with an edge l → j ′ . It is obvious that the result
is a pre-sharing graph with a smaller unbalancement factor than the original one.
The case for indeg(j) > χ(Bj , t) is symmetric.
P
P
Once the unbalancement factor is zero, since i∈I χ(Bi , x) = i∈I χ(Bi , t) we
can freely add other edges in such a way to complete the graph w.r.t. the condition
on the degree of nodes. We obtain a sharing graph G such that res(G) = B.
B Proofs of Section 5
In this section we give the proofs of correctness and optimality for the abstract
unification operators mgu2 and mgusl .
On the interaction between sharing and linearity
53
Proposition 5.1
The following properties hold:
U
U
1. α2 ( R) = α2 (R).
2. rel (γ2 (S), x, t)) = γ2 (rel (S, x, t)).
Proof
We begin by proving the first property.
α2 (⊎{{B1 , . . . , Bn }})
[
X
= α2 λv ∈
TBi U.
Bi (v)
1≤i≤n
= λv ∈
[
TBi U.
1≤i≤n
1≤i≤n
(
1 if
P
1≤i≤n
Bi (v) = 1
∞ otherwise
= ⊎ {{o1 , . . . , on }} where oi = λv ∈ TBi U.
(
1 if Bi (v) = 1
∞ otherwise
= ⊎ {{α2 (B1 ), . . . , α2 (Bn )}} .
Now we proceed with the proof of the second property.
rel(γ2 (S), x, t))
[
=
{γ2 (o) | o ∈ S, Tγ2 (o)U ∩ vars(x = t) 6= ∅}
[
=
{γ2 (o) | o ∈ S, ToU ∩ vars(x = t) 6= ∅}
(since ToU = Tγ2 (o)U)
= γ2 (rel (S, x, t))) .
Theorem 5.2
hα2 , γ2 i : ShLin2 ⇌ ShLinω is a Galois insertion.
Proof
It is obvious that α2 and γ2 are monotone functions and that they are both joinmorphisms. Extensionality of γ2 ◦ α2 follows from the fact that, given an ω-sharing
group B, we have B ∈ γ2 (α2 (B)). Finally, given a 2-sharing group o, we have
α2 (γ2 (o)) = {o}. This implies that α2 ◦ γ2 is the identity.
Theorem 5.5
Given [S]U ∈ ShLinω and the binding x/t with vars(x/t) ⊆ U , we have that
mgu2 ([S]U , x/t) = [(S \ S ′ )∪
]
↓
Y | Y ∈ ℘m (S ′ ), n ∈ χ(Y, x) ∩ χ(Y, t). n ≥ |Y | − 1 ]U ,
where S ′ = rel (S, x, t).
54
G. Amato and F. Scozzari
Proof
By using Prop. 5.1 point 2, and since o 6= o′ ⇒ γ2 (o) ∩ γ2 (o′ ) = ∅, we get:
α2 (γ2 (S) \ rel (γ2 (S), x, t))
= α2 (γ2 (S) \ γ2 (rel (S, x, t)))
= α2 (γ2 (S \ rel (S, x, t)))
= S \ rel (S, x, t) .
Therefore, we get the equality
h
mgu2 ([S]U , x/t) = S \ rel(S, x, t)∪
i
X
X
χ(B, x) =
χ(B, t) ≥ |R| − 1}
α2 {⊎R | R ∈ ℘m (rel (γ2 (S), x, t)),
B∈R
U
B∈R
Now, with simple algebraic manipulations, we obtain:
α2 ({⊎R | R ∈ ℘m (rel (γ2 (S), x, t)),
X
X
χ(B, t) ≥ |R| − 1})
B∈R
B∈R
= α2 ({⊎R | R ∈ ℘m (γ2 (rel (S, x, t))),
X
χ(B, x) =
X
χ(B, x) =
χ(B, t) ≥ |R| − 1})
B∈R
B∈R
= α2 ({⊎{{B1 , . . . , Bk }} | k ∈ N,
∀i.Bi ∈ γ2 (rel (S, x, t)),
X
χ(Bi , x) =
X
χ(Bi , t) ≥ k − 1})
1≤i≤k
1≤i≤k
= α2 ({⊎{{B1 , . . . , Bk }} | k ∈ N, {{o1 , . . . , ok }} ∈ ℘m (rel (S, x, t)),
X
X
χ(Bi , t) ≥ k − 1})
χ(Bi , x) =
∀i.Bi ∈ γ2 (oi ),
1≤i≤k
1≤i≤k
= α2 ({⊎{{B1 , . . . , Bk }} | k ∈ N, {{o1 , . . . , ok }} ∈ ℘m (rel (S, x, t)),
X
X
χ(Bi , t) ≥ k − 1})
χ(Bi , x) =
∀i.α2 (Bi ) = oi ,
1≤i≤k
1≤i≤k
(such oi ’s do always exist since rel (S, x, t) is downworld closed)
= ↓{α2 (⊎{{B1 , . . . , Bk }}) | k ∈ N, {{o1 , . . . , ok }} ∈ ℘m (rel(S, x, t)),
X
X
χ(Bi , t) ≥ k − 1}
χ(Bi , x) =
∀i.α2 (Bi ) = oi ,
1≤i≤k
1≤i≤k
= ↓{⊎{{α2 (B1 ), . . . , α2 (Bk )}} | k ∈ N, {{o1 , . . . , ok }} ∈ ℘m (rel (S, x, t)),
X
X
χ(Bi , t) ≥ k − 1}
χ(Bi , x) =
∀i.α2 (Bi ) = oi ,
1≤i≤k
1≤i≤k
(by Prop. 5.1 point 1)
= ↓{⊎{{o1 , . . . , ok }} | k ∈ N, {{o1 , . . . , ok }} ∈ ℘m (rel (S, x, t)),
X
X
χ(Bi , t) ≥ k − 1}}
χ(Bi , x) =
∀i.α2 (Bi ) = oi ,
1≤i≤k
1≤i≤k
= ↓{⊎{{o1 , . . . , ok }} | k ∈ N, {{o1 , . . . , ok }} ∈ ℘m (rel (S, x, t)),
X
X
χ(Bi′ , t) ≥ k − 1}
χ(Bi , x) =
∀i.α2 (Bi ) = oi , ∀i.α2 (Bi′ ) = oi ,
1≤i≤k
1≤i≤k
(we discuss later why this is faithful)
= ↓{⊎{{o1 , . . . , ok }} | k ∈ N, {{o1 , . . . , ok }} ∈ ℘m (rel (S, x, t)), n ≥ k − 1,
.
On the interaction between sharing and linearity
n∈{
X
Bi (x) | ∀i.α2 (Bi ) = oi } ∩ {
X
55
χ(Bi′ , t) | ∀i.α2 (Bi′ ) = oi }}
1≤i≤k
1≤i≤k
= ↓{⊎{{o1 , . . . , ok }} | k ∈ N, {{o1 , . . . , ok }} ∈ ℘m (rel (S, x, t)), n ≥ k − 1
X
X
X
χ(Bi′ , t) | ∀i.α2 (Bi′ ) = oi }} .
oi (x)] ∩ {
oim (x),
n∈[
1≤i≤k
1≤i≤k
1≤i≤k
The move from a single family {Bi }1≤i≤k to different families {Bi }1≤i≤k and
{Bi′ }1≤i≤k is possible since, if
X
X
∀i.α2 (Bi ) = oi and ∀i.α2 (Bi′ ) = oi and
χ(Bi , x) =
χ(Bi′ , t) ≥ k − 1 ,
1≤i≤k
1≤i≤k
we may define a family {Ci }1≤i≤k such that Ci (x) = Bi (x) and Ci (v) = B ′ (v) for
each v 6= x. It is immediate to check that the Ci ’s satisfy the condition
X
X
∀i.α2 (Ci ) = oi and
χ(Ci , x) =
χ(Ci , t) ≥ k − 1 .
1≤i≤k
1≤i≤k
P
If we denote with c({{o1 , . . . , ok }}, t) the set
1≤i≤k χ(Bi , t) | ∀i.α2 (Bi ) = oi ,
what remains to prove is that
]
↓{ X | X ∈ ℘m (rel (S, x, t)), n ∈ χ(X, x) ∩ c(X, t).n ≥ |X| − 1}
]
= ↓{ X | X ∈ ℘m (rel (S, x, t)), n ∈ χ(X, x) ∩ χ(X, t), n ≥ |X| − 1} ,
where the only difference is that we replaced c(X, t) with χ(X, t).
We begin by examining the relationship between c(X, t) and χ(X, t). First of all,
it is obvious that c(X, t) ⊆ χ(X, t), therefore we only need to prove half of the
equality.
If there exists o ∈ X such that χM (o, t) = ∞, then c(X, t) is an infinite set. We
call n its least element. Under the same conditions, χ(X, t) is the interval [n, ∞].
If there is no o ∈ X such that χM (o, t) = ∞, then c(X, t) = χ(X, t) and they are
both singletons.
In the same way, if there exists some o ∈ X such that o(x) = ∞ then χ(X, x)
is an interval of the kind [n, ∞). However, if there is no such o, then χ(X, x) is a
singleton, whose unique element is |{o ∈ X | o(x) = 1}|.
Assume that we have X ∈ ℘m (rel (S, x, t)) such that there exists n ∈ χ(X, x) ∩
χ(X, t) with n ≥ |X| − 1. We want to prove that we may find a multiset Y ∈
℘m (rel (S, x, t)) such that there exists m ≥ |Y | − 1 with m ∈ χ(Y, x) ∩ c(Y, t) and
U
U
X ≤ Y . This is enough to complete the proof of the theorem.
We distinguish several cases.
• χ(X, x) and χ(X, t) are both infinite. In this case, c(X, t) is infinite. Moroever,
since χ(X, x) is an interval, there are infinite natural numbers in χ(X, x) ∩
c(X, t). We may take Y = X.
• χ(X, t) is infinite and χ(X, x) is a singleton {v}, then v = |{o ∈ X | o(x) =
1}| ≤ k. Since it must be v ≥ k − 1, there are only two choices: either v = k
or v = k − 1. We distinguish the two subcases.
— v = k − 1. In this case, there exists o ∈ X such that χm (o, t) = 0 and
56
G. Amato and F. Scozzari
o(x) = 1, otherwise it is not possible that v ≥ χm (X, t). Since χ(X, t)
is infinite, the same holds for c(X, t), hence we may find an n ∈ c(X, t)
such that n ≥ v. Consider Y = X ⊎ (n − v) ∗ {{o}}. We have χ(Y, x) =
{v + (n − v)} = n, c(Y, t) = c(X, t) and |Y | = |X| + n − v = n + 1.
U
Therefore n ∈ c(Y, x) ∩ c(Y, t) and n ≥ |Y | − 1. Y is a valid result,
U
U
and X ≤ Y .
— v = k. If there is an o ∈ X such that χm (o, t) = 0, the proof proceeds
as in the previous case. Otherwise, χm (X, t) ≥ k and since it should be
v = k ≥ χm (X, t), we have χm (X, t) = k. Therefore k ∈ c(X, t) too,
since min c(X, t) = min χ(X, t), and we may take Y = X.
• if χ(X, t) is finite, then χ(X, t) = c(X, t) and we take Y = X.
Theorem 5.7
Given [S]U in ShLin2 and the binding x/t, let V = {v1 , . . . , vn } be vars(x/t) \ U .
Then,
mgu2 ([S]U , x/t) = mgu2 ([S ∪ {v1 , . . . , vn }]U∪V , x/t) .
Proof
First of all, given a finite set of variables V , let us define the extension operator
extV : ShLinω → ShLinω such that extV ([S]U ) = [S ∪ {{{v}} | v ∈ V \ U }]U∪V .
Given V = vars(x/t) \ U = {v1 , . . . , vn }, we have that
mgu2 ([S]U , x/t) = α2 (mguω (γ2 ([S]U ), x/t))
= α2 (mguω (extV (γ2 ([S]U )), x/t)) .
We also know that
mgu2 ([S ∪ {v1 , . . . , vn }]U∪V , x/t) =
α2 (mguω (γ2 ([S ∪ {v1 , . . . , vn }]U∪V ), x/t)) .
Hence, it is enough to prove that
extV (γ2 ([S]U )) = γ2 ([S ∪ {v1 , . . . , vn }]U∪V ) .
By definition of γ2 , we have that
γ2 ([S ∪ {v1 , . . . , vn }]U∪V )
[
=
{γ2 (o) | o ∈ S ∪ {v1 , . . . , vn }} U∪V
[
=
{γ2 (o) | o ∈ S} ∪ {{{v1 }}, . . . , {{vn }}} U∪V
= extV (γ2 ([S]U )) ,
which completes the proof.
[since γ2 (vi ) = {{vi }}]
On the interaction between sharing and linearity
57
Theorem 5.9
Given [S]U ∈ ShLin2 and the binding x/t with vars(x/t) ⊆ U , we have
[
mgu2 ([S]U , x/t) = [(S \ S ′ ) ∪ ↓
res(X, x, t)]U ,
X⊆S ′
where S ′ = rel (S, x, t) and res(X, x, t) is defined as follows:
U
1. if X is non-linear for x and t, then res(X, x, t) = { X 2 };
2. if X is non-linear for x and linear for t, |Xx | ≤ 1 and |Xt | ≥ 1, then we have
U
U 2
U
res(X, x, t) = {( Xx ) ⊎ ( Xxt
) ⊎ ( Xt2 )};
3. if X is linear for x and strongly non-linear for t, |Xx | ≥ 1 and |Xt | ≤ 1, then
U
U 2
U
we have res(X, x, t) = {( Xx2 ) ⊎ ( Xxt
) ⊎ ( Xt )};
4. if X is linear for x and not strongly non-linear for t, |Xt | ≤ 1, then we have
]
]
]
2
) ⊎ ( Xt ) | Z ∈ ℘m (Xx ),
res(X, x, t) = {( Z) ⊎ ( Xxt
|Z| = χM (Xt , t) = χm (Xt , t),
TZU = Xx } ;
5. otherwise res(X, x, t) = ∅.
Proof
By Theorem 5.5, we only need to show that:
[
]
↓
Y | Y ∈ ℘m (S ′ ), n ∈ χ(Y, x) ∩ χ(Y, t). n ≥ |Y | − 1 = ↓
res(X, x, t) ,
X⊆S ′
(B1)
where S ′ = rel (S, x, t). We prove the two different inclusions separately.
Left to Right Inclusion. Let ō ∈ res(X, x, t) for some X ⊆ rel (S, x, t). We
want to prove that there exist Y ∈ ℘m (S ′ ) and n ∈ χ(Y, x) ∩ χ(Y, t) such that
n ≥ |Y | − 1 and ⊎Y = ō. We distinguish several cases:
• if X is non-linear for x and t, it is ⊎X 2 = ō. We distinguish two subcases:
— if χM (X, t) = ∞, it is enough to take Y = X ⊎ X.
— if χM (X, t) is finite, since X is non-linear for t, there exists o′ ∈ X such
that χm (o′ , t) > 1. Since S ′ is downward closed, consider o ∈ S such that
o(x) = min(o′ (x), 1) and o(v) = o′ (v) if v 6= x. We show that there exists
a natural number n such that, for Y = X ⊎X ⊎n{{o}}, we have χm (Y, t) ≥
χm (Y, x) and χm (Y, t) ≥ |Y | − 1. Since χm (Y, x) ≤ 2χm (X, x) + n, we
need to solve the inequalities 2χm (X, t) + nχm (o, t) ≥ 2χm (X, x) + n
and 2χm (X, t) + nχm (o, t) ≥ 2|X| + n. Since χm (o, t) ≥ 2, there always
U
exists a solution for n. Since χM (X, x) = ∞, we have that Y = ō is
in the left hand side of (B1).
• if X is non-linear for x and linear for t. We need to find m such that, if we
take Y = Xx ⊎ 2Xxt ⊎ 2mXt , we have χm (Y, t) ≥ χm (Y, x). In other words,
we need to solve the disequation 2χm (Xxt , t) + 2mχm (Xt , t) ≥ χm (Xx , x) +
2χm (Xxt , x), which is always possible, since |Xt | ≥ 1. Since |Y | ≤ 1 + 2|Xxt |+
2m|Xt | we have χm (X, t) ≥ |Y | − 1.
58
G. Amato and F. Scozzari
• if X is linear for x and strongly non-linear for t, we distinguish two subcases:
— χM (X, t) = ∞. Let n = 2χm (Xxt , t) + χm (Xt , t) and consider any number m such that 2m|Xx | + 2|Xxt | ≥ n (such an m always exists since
|Xx | ≥ 1). Then, consider the multiset Y = 2mXx ⊎ 2Xxt ⊎ Xt , and
we have that χm (Y, x) = χM (Y, x) = 2m|Xx | + 2|Xxt | ≥ χm (Y, t) by
construction. Moreover χM (Y, t) = ∞ and |Y | ≤ 2m|Xx | + 2|Xxt | + 1.
U
Then Y ∈ res(X, x, t) is a valid resultant sharing group.
— χM (X, t) is finite. Let o ∈ Xxt be a sharing group such that χM (o, t) > 1
and o′ be a generic sharing group in Xx . We need to find two natural
numbers n and m such that, if we take Y = 2Xx ⊎ 2Xxt ⊎ Xt ⊎ m{{o}} ⊎
n{{o′ }}, we obtain χm (Y, x) = χm (Y, t) (from this immediately follows
χM (Y, x) = χM (Y, t)) and χm (Y, x) ≥ |Y | − 1. This means we need to
solve the equations:
2|Xx | + 2|Xxt | + m + n = 2χm (Xxt , t) + χm (Xt , t) + mχm (o, t)
2|Xx | + 2|Xxt | + m + n ≥ 2|Xx | + 2|Xxt | + |Xt | + m + n − 1
Since |Xt | ≤ 1, the second equation is always satisfied. A solution for
the first equation always exists, since the greatest common divisor of
χm (o, t) − 1 and 1 is 1.
• if X is linear for x and X is not strongly non-linear for t, consider the multiset
Y = Z ⊎ Xxt ⊎ Xxt ⊎ Xt . Then χm (Y, x) = χM (Y, x) = |Z| + 2|Xxt | and
χm (Y, t) = χM (Y, t) = 2|Xxt | + χm (Xt , t). Since |Z| = χm (Xt , t), we have
that χm (Y, x) = χm (Y, t). Moreover, |Y | = |Z| + 2|Xxt | + |Xt | ≤ χm (Xt , t) +
2|Xxt | + 1 = χm (Y, t) + 1.
U
Right to left inclusion. Let o = X where X ∈ ℘m (S ′ ) and there exists
n ≥ |X| − 1 such that n ∈ χ(X, x) ∩ χ(X, t). We show that there exists Y ⊆ S ′ and
o′ ∈ res(Y, x, t) such that o′ ≥2 o. Let k = |X|. We partition X in three multisets
Xx = X|{o|χM (o,t)=0} , Xt = X|{o|χM (o,x)=0} and X|xt = X|{o|χM (o,t)>0∧χM (o,t)>0} .
Note that Xx , Xt and Xxt here are multisets and not ordinary set as in the definition
of mgu2 . We distinguish several cases:
• if TXU is linear for x and strongly non-linear for t, then χm (X, x) = χM (X, x)
= |Xx | + |Xxt | ≤ k. Since χm (X, x) ≥ k − 1, there are two cases: either
|Xx | + |Xxt | = k − 1 or |Xx | + |Xxt | = k, which implies that |Xt | ≤ 1.
Since TXU is strongly non-linear for t, there exists o′′ ∈ Xt ⊎ Xxt such that
χM (o′′ , t) ≥ 2, and thus χm (X, t) ≥ 2. Therefore χm (X, t) > |Xxt |. Since
χm (X, x) = χM (X, x) ≥ χm (X, t), we have that |Xx | ≥ 1. It follows that
U
U
U
U
o = (Xx ⊎ Xxt ⊎ Xt ) ≤2 ( TXx U)2 ⊎ ( TXxt U)2 ⊎ ( TXt U) ∈ res(TXU, x, t).
• if TXU is linear for x and not strongly non-linear for t, then, as in the previous
case we have |Xt | ≤ 1. Since X is not strongly non-linear for t, χM (X, t) =
χm (X, t) = |Xxt |+χM (Xt , t). Moreover, χM (X, x) = χm (X, x) = |Xx |+|Xxt |.
By the condition n ∈ χ(X, x) ∩ χ(X, t), we get χM (Xt , t) = |Xx |. Therefore
U
U
U
o ≤2 TXx U ⊎ ( TXxt U)2 ⊎ ( Xt ) ∈ res(TXU, x, t).
U
• if TXU is non-linear for x and t, then o ≤2 ( TXU)2 ∈ res(TXU, x, t).
On the interaction between sharing and linearity
59
• if TXU is non-linear for x and linear t, the proof is symmetric to the one of
the first case.
Theorem 5.12
Given [S]U ∈ ShLin2 and the binding x/t with vars(x/t) ⊆ U , we have
[
mgu2 ([S]U , x/t) = [(S \ S ′ ) ∪ ↓
(res(X, x, t) ∪ res ′ (X, x, t))]U ,
X⊆max S ′
where S ′ = rel (S, x, t) and
( U
{ X 2}
′
res (X, x, t) =
∅
if X = Xxt and l(X) is linear for t ,
otherwise .
Proof
It clearly holds that:
mgu2 ([S]U , x/t) ⊇ [(S \ S ′ ) ∪ ↓
[
(res(X, x, t) ∪ res ′ (X, x, t))]U
(B2)
X⊆max S ′
U
since, for each X ⊆ max S ′ , if res ′ (X, x, t) is non-empty then X 2 may be generated by the characterization in Theorem 5.9. It is enough to take X ′ = {l(o) | o ∈
U
U
X}, hence X ′ = X 2 ∈ res(X ′ , x, t) according to the last case of Theorem 5.9.
We prove the opposite inclusion. Let X ⊆ S ′ and assume that X * max S ′ .
There exists X ′ ⊆ max S ′ obtained by replacing each a ∈ X with b ∈ max S ′
such that a ≤2 b. We have that |X ′ | ≤ |X| since two different elements in X may
be replaced with the same maximal element in X ′ . We want to prove that either
res(X, x, t) = ∅, or res(X, x, t) ⊆ ↓res(X ′ , x, t) or res(X, x, t) ⊆ ↓res ′ (X ′ , x, t).
Therefore, we assume that res(X, x, t) 6= ∅ and compare the linearity properties
(linear, non linear, strongly non-linear) of X ′ w.r.t. those of X.
If they coincide, then it follows that res(X, x, t) ⊆ ↓res(X ′ , x, t). This happens
because both res(X, x, t) and res(X ′ , x, t) are obtained by the same case of Theorem
5.9. However, note that X ′ may have less elements than X and therefore some
variable which is non-linear in res(X, x, t) could be linear in res(X ′ , x, t). Actually,
this never happens since the elements in X ′ which are not explicitly delinearized
are either elements of the multiset Z in the third case of Theorem 5.9 (and therefore
may appear multiple times) or elements of Xt (Xx ) subject to the condition |Xt | ≤ 1
(|Xx | ≤ 1).
Assume that the linearity properties of X and X ′ do not coincide. The only
interesting case is when X is linear for x and not strongly non-linear for t. In all
the other cases, it is immediate from the definition that res(X, x, t) ⊆ ↓res(X ′ , x, t).
If X ′ is not linear for x and for t, then it holds res(X, x, t) ⊆ ↓res(X ′ , x, t) by
definition.
If X ′ is linear for x and strongly non-linear for t, then it is immediate from the
definition that res(X, x, t) ⊆ ↓res(X ′ , x, t), provided that |Xx | ≥ 1. Otherwise, it
must be |Xt | = 0 and therefore, in order to be res(X, x, t) 6= ∅, we have X =
Xxt and χM (X, t) = 1, which means l(X ′ ) = X is linear for t. It follows that
U
res(X, x, t) = { X 2 } = res ′ (X ′ , x, t).
60
G. Amato and F. Scozzari
If X ′ is not linear for x and linear for t, we show that |Xx | ≤ 1. Assume, by
contradiction, that |Xx | > 1. Since X ′ is linear for t and |Xt | ≤ 1, then χM (Xt , t) =
χm (Xt , t) ≤ 1, while |TZU| = |Xx | > 1, which is a contradiction. Thus it must be
U
|Xx | ≤ 1. If |Xx | = 0 then |Xt | = 0, hence res(X, x, t) = { X 2 } and res(X, x, t) =
res ′ (X, x, t). If |Xx | = 1, since X ′ is linear for t, it follows that |Z| = 1. Thus
res(X, x, t) ⊆ ↓res(X ′ , x, t).
Theorem 5.16
The operator mgusl in Definition 5.15 is correct and optimal w.r.t. mgu, when
vars(x/t) ⊆ U .
Proof
It is enough to prove that mgusl is correct and optimal w.r.t. mgu2 , namely, that:
mgusl ([S, L, U ]), x/t) = αsl (mgu2 (γsl ([S, L, U ]), x/t)) .
Let γsl ([S, L, U ]) = [T ]U . By Theorem 5.12, it holds that:
αsl (mgu2 (γsl ([S, L, U ]), x/t)
[
= αsl ([(T \ T ′ ) ∪ ↓
(res(Y, x, t) ∪ res ′ (Y, x, t)})]U
Y ⊆max T ′
G
= αsl [T \ T ′ ]U ⊔2
Y ⊆max T ′
([↓res(Y, x, t)]U ⊔2 [↓res ′ (Y, x, t)}]U ) ,
where T ′ = rel (T, x, t) and ⊔2 is the lowest upper bound in ShLin2 . By additivity
of αsl , this is equivalent to
G
αsl ([T \ T ′ ]U ) ⊔sl
(αsl ([res(Y, x, t)]U ) ⊔sl αsl ([res ′ (Y, x, t)]U )) .
(B3)
Y ⊆max T ′
′
′
Let X, L , U and K as in Definition 5.15, we have that mgusl ([S, L, U ], x/t) is
equivalent to
[(S \ X) ∪ K, U ′ ∪ L′ , U ] .
(B4)
We need to prove that equations (B3) and (B4) do coincide. In the rest of the paper,
we assume that the result of (B3) is [S ′′ , L′′ , U ].
Sharing. We first prove that the Sharing components of the two equations are
equal, i.e. that S ′′ = (S \ X) ∪ K. Given B ∈ S ′′ , there are several cases. If B = ToU
with o ∈ T \ T ′ , then B ∈ S \ X.
S
If B = ToU, for o ∈ res ′ (Y, x, t) with Y ⊆ max T ′ , then B = {ToU | o ∈ Y } with
U +
Y = Yxt and l(Y ) is linear for t. If x ∈ L then is generated by (Xxt
) , since l(Y )
is linear for t. If x ∈
/ L there are two cases: if Y is linear for t then it is generated
>1
=1 +
) , otherwise by bin(Xt>1 ∪ Xxt
, Xx ∪ Xxt , X ∗ ). Thus B ∈ K.
by (Xxt
Now, assume that B = ToU with o ∈ res(Y, x, t) and ∅ 6= Y ⊆ max T ′ . Then
S
B = W where W = {ToU | o ∈ Y }. Since Y is made of maximal elements and
[T ]U = γ2 ([S, L, U ]), we have that Y is linear for x iff x ∈ L. For the same reason,
Y is linear for t iff (W, L) is linear for t. As a consequence, if Y is non-linear for t,
then (X, L) is non-linear for t.
We proceed by cases:
On the interaction between sharing and linearity
61
U
Y non-linear for x and t. Then res(Y, x, t) = { Y 2 }. Since (X, L) is non-linear
>1
for x and t, we have Xt>1 ∪ Xxt
6= ∅ and Xx ∪ Xxt 6= ∅. Thus B ∈ bin(Xt>1 ∪
>1
∗
Xxt , Xx ∪ Xxt , X ) ⊆ K.
Y non-linear for x and linear for t. By hypothesis |Yx | ≤ 1 and |Yt | ≥ 1, hence
U
U 2
U
o = ( Yx ) ⊎ ( Yxt
) ⊎ ( Yt2 ) and
=1
=1 ∗
B ∈ bin((Xt=1 )+ , Xx ∪ Xxt
, (Xxt
) )⊆K .
=1 ∗
In particular, B ∈ bin((Xt=1 )+ , Xx , (Xxt
) ) when |Yx | = 1, otherwise B ∈
=1 +
=1
=1 ∗
bin((Xt ) , Xxt , (Xxt ) ).
Y linear for x and strongly non-linear for t. In this case we have that o =
U
U 2
U
( Yx2 ) ⊎ ( Yxt
) ⊎ ( Yt ) with |Yx | ≥ 1 and |Yt | ≤ 1. By definition of strong
non-linearity, we have two cases:
• there exists o ∈ Yxt such that χM (o, t) > 1: in this case
>1
∗
B ∈ bin(Xt ∪ {∅}, Xxt
, Xx+ , Xxt
)⊆K ;
• there exists o ∈ Yt such that χM (o, t) = ∞: in this case
∗
)⊆K .
B ∈ bin(Xt=∞ , Xx+ , Xxt
Y linear for x and non strongly non-linear for t. In this case
]
]
]
2
o = ( Z ′ ) ⊎ ( Yxt
) ⊎ ( Yt ) ,
with |Yt | = 1, for some Z ′ ∈ ℘m (Yx ) such that |Z ′ | = χm (Yt , t) and TZ ′ U = Yx .
It is obvious that
=1 ∗
B ∈ bin({{o} ∪ (∪Z) | o ∈ Xt∈N , Z ⊆ Xx , 1 ≤ |Z| ≤ χL
M (o, t)}, (Xxt ) ) ⊆ K ,
by choosing Z = {ToU | o ∈ Z ′ }.
This proves that if B ∈ S ′′ , then B ∈ (S \ X) ∪ K. Now, we need to prove the
converse implication. If B ∈ S \ X, then B = ToU for some o ∈ T , and it is obvious
that o ∈ T \ T ′ , hence B ∈ S ′′ .
Therefore, assume that B ∈ K, and consider the case when x ∈ L and B ∈
∗
bin(Xt=∞ , Xx+ , Xxt
). We have that B = A ∪ (∪A′ ) ∪ (∪A′′ ) for some A ∈ Xt=∞ , A′
non-empty subset of Xx and A′′ ⊆ Xxt . We may find o′ ∈ max T ′ , Y ′ , Y ′′ ⊆ max T ′
such that To′ U = A, TY ′ U = A′ and TY ′′ U = A′′ . We have that Y ′′′ = {o′ }∪Y ′ ∪Y ′′ is
linear for x and strongly non-linear for t (due to the element o′ ), with |Yx′′′ | ≥ 1 and
|Yt′′′ | ≤ 1. Therefore, we may apply the definition of res to obtain res(Y ′′′ , x, t) =
{o} with ToU = B, hence B ∈ S ′′ .
With similar reasonings, we may prove that for every B ∈ K, we have B ∈ S ′′ .
In particular: the second line of (6) corresponds to the case we choose a Y ′′′ which
′′′
is linear for x and strongly non-linear for t, due to an element o ∈ Yxt
which
′′′
χM (o, t) > 1; the third line of (6) corresponds to the case Y is linear for X and
is not strongly non-linear for t; the first line of (7) corresponds to the case Y ′′′ is
non-linear for both x and t; the second line of (7) corresponds to the case Y ′′′ is
linear for t and non-linear for x.
=1 +
Finally, if x ∈
/ L and B ∈ (Xxt
) , it is possible that B cannot be obtained as
62
G. Amato and F. Scozzari
res(Y ′′′ , x, t) for any Y ′′′ ⊆ max T ′ . However, B may be obtained as res ′ (Y ′′′ , x, t),
U +
choosing Y ′′′ as in the previous cases. The same happens if x ∈ Land B ∈ (Xxt
) .
′′
′
′
Linearity. We want to prove that L = L ∪ U . First of all, let us define L′′g =
U \ vars(mgu2 ([T ]U , x/t)) the set of ground variables in mgu2 ([T ]U , x/t), hence
L′′g ⊆ L′′ . We are going to prove that U ′ = L′′g and L′ \ U ′ = L′′ \ L′′g . The first
equality trivially follows from the fact that the sharing component of mgusl is
optimal, hence a variable occurs in a sharing group of S \ S ∪ K iff it occurs in a
2-sharing group of mgu2 ([T ]U , x/t).
Now, we consider a variable v ∈ U \ U ′ , and prove that v ∈ L′ iff v ∈ L′′ . There
are several cases. If we assume that v ∈
/ L, by (8) we have v ∈
/ L′ . Moreover, if
′
Y ∈ max T and v ∈ TY U, by maximality of Y we have Y (v) = ∞. Hence, by
Theorem 5.12, we have v ∈
/ L′′ . If we assume that v ∈
/ X, by (8) we have v ∈ L′ iff
′′
v ∈ L. Since vars(X) = vars(T ), we also have v ∈ L iff v ∈ L and therefore v ∈ L′
iff v ∈ L′′ .
The only case it remains to prove is v ∈ vars(X) ∩ L which, combined with the
condition v ∈
/ U ′ , gives v ∈ vars(K) ∩ L. First of all, note that if v ∈ vars(Xxt )
′
then v ∈
/ L (by definition of L′ ) and v ∈
/ L′′ (since Xxt ) appears delinearized in
every 2-sharing group resulting from res or res ′ . If v ∈
/ vars(Xxt ), we distinguish
four subcases:
• x ∈ L and (S, L) linear for t. Given Y ⊆ max T ′ , checking the forth case
of Theorem 5.9 when χM (Yt , t) = 1, we have that res(Y, x, t) is not linear
for v iff v ∈ vars(Yxt ) or v ∈ vars(Yx ) ∩ vars(Yt ). Note that there exists
′
Y ⊆ max T ′ s.t. v ∈ vars(Yxt ) ∪ (vars(Yx ) ∩ vars(Yt )) iff v ∈ vars(Txt
)∪
′
′
′′
′
′
(vars(Tx ) ∩ vars (Tt )). Finally v ∈ L iff v ∈ vars(Txt ) ∪ (vars (Tx ) ∩ vars (Tt′ ))
iff v ∈ (Xxt ∪ (Xx ∩ Xt )) iff v ∈ L′ .
• x ∈ L and (S, L) not linear for t. Given Y ⊆ max T ′ , checking the third and
forth cases (when χM (Y, t) > 1) of Theorem 5.9, we have that res(Y, x, t)
non-linear for v implies v ∈ vars(Yxt ) or v ∈ vars(Yx ), which is equivalent to
v ∈ Xxt ∪ Xx , i.e. v ∈
/ L′ . On the other hand, if v ∈ Xx , we distinguish the
cases:
— (S, L) strongly non-linear for t. There exists o ∈ T ′ such that χM (o, t) =
′
∞ or o ∈ Txt
such that χM (o, t) > 1. Moreover, there exists o′ ∈ Tx′
such that v ∈ To′ U. If we take Y = {o, o′ }, we have that res(Y, x, t) is
not linear for v, hence v ∈
/ L′′ .
— (S, L) is not strongly non-linear for t. There exists o ∈ Tt′ such that
1 < χM (o, t) < ∞. Moreover, there exists o′ ∈ Tx′ such that v ∈ To′ U. If
we take Y ′ = {o, o′ }, by the fourth case in the definition of res, we have
res(Y, x, t) is not linear for v, i.e. v ∈
/ L′′ .
• x∈
/ L and (S, L) linear for t. If v ∈
/ L′′ then v ∈ vars(Yxt ) or v ∈ vars(Yt ).
This implies v ∈ Xxt ∪Xt , i.e. v ∈
/ L′ . On the other hand, if v ∈ Xt , there exist
′
o ∈ Tx such that χM (o, x) = ∞ and o′ ∈ Tt′ such that v ∈ To′ U. By definition
of res, we have that res({o, o′ }, x, y) is not linear for v, hence v ∈
/ L′′ .
′
• x∈
/ L and (S, L) non-linear for t. Since L = L \ X, it is obvious that v ∈
/ L′ .
On the interaction between sharing and linearity
63
Moreover, there exist o ∈ T ′ such that χM (o, x) = ∞, o′ ∈ T ′ such that
χM (o, t) > 1 and o′′ ∈ T ′ such that v ∈ To′′ U. Note that it is possible that
o = o′ = o′′ . By definition, we have res({o, o′ , o′′ }, x, t) is not linear for v,
hence v ∈
/ L′′ .
Theorem 5.19
The operator mgusl in Definition 5.18 is the optimal abstraction of mgu.
Proof
First of all, given a finite set of variables V , let us define the extension operator
extV : ShLin2 → ShLin2 such that extV ([S]U ) = [S ∪ {v | v ∈ V \ U }]U∪V . Given
V = vars(x/t) \ U , we have that
αsl (mgu2 (γsl ([S, L, U ], x/t)) = αsl (extV (mgu2 (γsl ([S, L, U ])), x/t)) .
By Theorem 5.16 we have that
mgusl ([S, L, U ], x/t) = mgusl ([S ∪ V, L ∪ V, U ∪ V ], x/t) =
αsl (mgu2 (γsl ([S ∪ V, L ∪ V, U ∪ V ], x/t))) .
Hence, it is enough to prove that
extV (γsl ([S, L, U ]) = γ2 ([S ∪ V, L ∪ V, U ∪ V ]) .
By definition of γ2 , we have that
γsl ([S ∪ V, L ∪ V, U ∪ V ]) =
= [{BL∪V | B ∈ S} ∪ {BL∪V | B ∈ V }]U∪V
= [{BL | B ∈ S} ∪ V ]U∪V
[since vL∪V = v]
= extV (γsl ([S, L, U ]) ,
which completes the proof.
References
Amato, G. and Scozzari, F. 2002. Optimality in goal-dependent analysis of sharing. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference on Declarative Programming (AGP’02),
J. J. Moreno-Navarro and J. Mariño-Carballo, Eds. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid,
Madrid, 189–205.
Amato, G. and Scozzari, F. 2003. A general framework for variable aliasing: Towards optimal operators for sharing properties. In Logic Based Program Synthesis and
Transformation 12th International Workshop, LOPSTR 2002, Madrid, Spain, September 17–20, 2002. Revised Selected Papers, M. Leuschel, Ed. Lecture Notes in Computer
Science, vol. 2664. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 52–70.
Amato, G. and Scozzari, F. 2005. On abstract unification for variable aliasing. Tech.
Rep. TR-05-08, Dipartimento di Informatica, Università di Pisa.
Amato, G. and Scozzari, F. 2009. Optimality in goal-dependent analysis of sharing.
To appear in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP).
64
G. Amato and F. Scozzari
Armstrong, T., Marriott, K., Schachte, P., and Søndergaard, H. 1994. Boolean
functions for dependency analysis: Algebraic properties and efficient representation. In
Static Analysis, First International Static Analysis Symposium, SAS’94 Namur, Belgium, September 28–30, 1994, Proceedings, B. Le Charlier, Ed. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 864. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 266–280.
Bagnara, R., Hill, P. M., and Zaffanella, E. 2002. Set-sharing is redundant for
pair-sharing. Theoretical Computer Science 277, 1–2 (Apr.), 3–46.
Bagnara, R., Zaffanella, E., and Hill, P. M. 2005. Enhanced sharing analysis techniques: A comprehensive evaluation. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming 5, 1–2
(Jan.), 1–43.
Bueno, F., Cabeza, D., Carro, M., Hermenegildo, M. V., López-Garcı́a, P., and
Puebla, G. 1997. The Ciao Prolog system. reference manual. Tech. Rep. CLIP3/97,
School of Computer Science, Technical University of Madrid (UPM). Available from
http://www.ciaohome.org/. Last accessed July 14, 2009.
Bueno, F. and Garcı́a de la Banda, M. J. 2004. Set-sharing is not always redundant for pair-sharing. In Functional and Logic Programming, 7th International Symposium, FLOPS 2004, Nara, Japan, April 7–9, 2004, Proceedings, Y. Kameyama and
P. J. Stuckey, Eds. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2998. Springer, Berlin
Heidelberg, 117–131.
Codish, M., Dams, D., and Yardeni, E. 1991. Derivation and safety of an abstract
unification algorithm for groundness and aliasing analysis. In Logic Programming, Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference, K. Furukawa, Ed. Logic Programming.
The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 79–93.
Codish, M., Lagoon, V., and Bueno, F. 2000. An algebraic approach to sharing analysis
of logic programs. The Journal of Logic Programming 42, 2 (Feb.), 110–149.
Codish, M., Marriott, K., and Taboch, C. 2000. Improving program analyses by
structure untupling. The Journal of Logic Programming 43, 3 (June), 251–263.
Codish, M., Søndergaard, H., and Stuckey, P. J. 1999. Sharing and groundness
dependencies in logic programs. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and
Systems 21, 5 (Sept.), 948–976.
Cortesi, A. and Filé, G. 1999. Sharing is optimal. The Journal of Logic Programming 38, 3 (Mar.), 371–386.
Cortesi, A., Filé, G., Giacobazzi, R., Palamidessi, C., and Ranzato, F. 1997. Complementation in abstract interpretation. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages
and Systems 19, 1 (Jan.), 7–47.
Cortesi, A., Filé, G., and Winsborough, W. W. 1998. The quotient of an abstract
interpretation. Theoretical Computer Science 202, 1–2 (July), 163–192.
Cousot, P. and Cousot, R. 1979. Systematic design of program analysis frameworks. In
POPL ’79: Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGACT-SIGPLAN symposium on Principles
of programming languages. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 269–282.
Cousot, P. and Cousot, R. 1992a. Abstract interpretation and applications to logic
programs. The Journal of Logic Programming 13, 2–3 (July), 103–179.
Cousot, P. and Cousot, R. 1992b. Abstract interpretation frameworks. Journal of
Logic and Computation 2, 4 (Aug.), 511–549.
Cousot, P. and Cousot, R. 1992c. Comparing the Galois connection and widening/narrowing approaches to abstract interpretation. In Programming Language Implementation and Logic Programming, 4th International Symposium, PLILP ’92 Leuven,
Belgium, August 26–28, 1992, Proceedings, M. Bruynooghe and M. Wirsing, Eds. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 631. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 269–295. Invited
paper.
On the interaction between sharing and linearity
65
Hans, W. and Winkler, S. 1992.
Aliasing and groundness analysis of
logic programs through abstract interpretation and its safety.
Tech. Rep.
92–27, Technical University of Aachen (RWTH Aachen).
Available from
http://sunsite.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/Publications/AIB. Last accessed July
10, 2009.
Hermenegildo, M. V. and Rossi, F. 1995. Strict and nonstrict independent andparallelism in logic programs: Correctness, efficiency, and compile-time conditions. The
Journal of Logic Programming 22, 1 (Jan.), 1–45.
Hill, P. M., Zaffanella, E., and Bagnara, R. 2004. A correct, precise and efficient
integration of set-sharing, freeness and linearity for the analysis of finite and rational
tree languages. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming 4, 3 (May), 289–323.
Howe, J. M. and King, A. 2003. Three optimisations for sharing. Theory and Practice
of Logic Programming 3, 2 (Jan.), 243–257.
Jacobs, D. and Langen, A. 1992. Static analysis of logic programs for independent
AND parallelism. The Journal of Logic Programming 13, 2–3 (July), 291–314.
Jones, N. D. and Søndergaard, H. 1987. A semantics-based framework for the abstract interpretation of Prolog. In Abstract Interpretation of Declarative Languages,
S. Abramsky and C. Hankin, Eds. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, UK, 123–142.
King, A. 1994. A synergistic analysis for sharing and groundness which traces linearity.
In Programming Languages and Systems — ESOP ’94, 5th European Symposium on
Programming Edinburg, U.K., April 11–13, 1994, Proceedings, D. Sannella, Ed. Lecture
Notes in Computer Science, vol. 788. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 363–378.
King, A. 2000. Pair-sharing over rational trees. The Journal of Logic Programming 46, 1–
2 (Nov.–Dec.), 139–155.
Lagoon, V. and Stuckey, P. J. 2002. Precise pair-sharing analysis of logic programs. In
PPDP ’02: Proceedings of the 4th ACM SIGPLAN international conference on Principles and practice of declarative programming. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 99–108.
Langen, A. 1990. Static analysis for independent And-parallelism in logic programs.
Ph.D. thesis, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Levi, G. and Spoto, F. 2003. Pair-independence and freeness analysis through linear
refinement. Information and Computation 182, 1 (Apr.), 14–52.
Mac Lane, S. 1988. Categories for the Working Mathematician, Second ed. Graduate
Texts in Mathematics, vol. 5. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg.
Marriott, K., Søndergaard, H., and Jones, N. D. 1994. Denotational abstract interpretation of logic programs. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and
Systems 16, 3 (May), 607–648.
Muthukumar, K. and Hermenegildo, M. V. 1992. Compile-time derivation of variable
dependency using abstract interpretation. The Journal of Logic Programming 13, 2–3
(July), 315–347.
Søndergaard, H. 1986. An application of abstract interpretation of logic programs: Occur check reduction. In ESOP 86, European Symposium on Programming Saarbrcken,
Federal Republic of Germany March 17–19, 1986, Proceedings, B. Robinet and R. Wilhelm, Eds. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 213. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg,
327–338.
Sterling, L. and Shapiro, E. Y. 1994. The Art of Prolog: Advanced Programming
Techniques, Second ed. Logic Programming. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
| 6cs.PL
|
arXiv:1412.2490v4 [math.RA] 25 Jan 2016
SIMPLE TWISTED GROUP ALGEBRAS OF DIMENSION p4
AND THEIR SEMI-CENTERS
OFIR SCHNABEL
Abstract. For simple twisted group algebra over a group G, if Gp is Hall
subgroup of G then the semi-center is simple. Simple twisted groups algebras
correspond to groups of central type. We classify all groups of central type of
order p4 where p is prime and use this to show that for odd primes p there exists
a unique group G of order p4 such that there exists simple twisted group algebra over G with a commutative semi-center. Moreover, if 1 < |G| < 64, then
the semi-center of simple twisted group algebras over G is non-commutative
and this bounds are strict.
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification: 16S35, 20C25, 20E99.
1. Introduction
Let G be a finite group. A twisted group algebra over C, denoted by Cf G, is
an associative algebra with basis {ug }g∈G . The multiplication is defined on basis
elements as follows. For any x, y ∈ G
(1)
ux uy = f (x, y)uxy ,
and it is extended distributively. Here, f ∈ Z 2 (G, C∗ ). That is, f is a 2-cocycle. By
a generalization of Maschke’s theorem, complex twisted group algebras are semisimple [14, Theorem 3.2.10] and therefore, by the Artin-Wedderburn theorem it is
isomorphic to a direct sum of matrix algebras. For a non-trivial group G, the group
algebra CG is not simple. However, it turns out that 2-cocycles, f ∈ Z 2 (G, C∗ )
may exist such that Cf G is simple. A group G admitting such a phenomenon is
called of central type 1, and the 2-cocycle f ∈ Z 2 (G, C∗ ) is called nondegenerate.
Evidently, the size of any group of central type is a square.
It turns out that twisted group algebras and groups of central type play a major role in the understanding of other algebraic objects, as graded algebras (see
[3],[10],[11]), semi-invariants of matrices (see [12]) and twisted category algebras
(see [7],[15]).
The classification of the abelian groups of central type is well known (see §3).
It is much harder to understand non-abelian groups of central type. In fact, their
complete classification up to isomorphism looks like an impossible task. In [13]
R. Howlett and M. Isaacs proved, using the classification of finite simple groups,
that groups of central type are solvable. Another important result is that a cocycle
f ∈ Z 2 (G, C∗ ) is nondegenerate if and only if its restriction to any Hall subgroup
is nondegenerate (see [8, Corollary 4], [17, Lemma 2.7]). In [11] we classify all the
This work has been supported by the Minerva Stiftung.
1 Classically, a group G is said to be of central type if it has a faithful irreducible character
χ such that χ(1)2 = |G : Z|, where Z = Z(G). In this paper however we call G/Z (which is
sometimes called “Central-type factor group”) of central type.
1
2
OFIR SCHNABEL
groups of central type of order n2 where n is a square-free number. Also, in [12,
Theorem C] we show that for any group of central type G, Z(G) embeds into Ĝ,
where Z(G) is the center of G and Ĝ is the group of 1-dimensional characters of G.
In the first part of this paper we classify the groups of central type of order p4
where p is a prime number. In order to do so we use the classification of groups of
order p4 [6, p.100-102]. For convenience we change the notations from [6, p.100-102]
and rewrite these groups. The corresponding tables are Table 1 for the odd case
and Table 2 for the even case. The following two theorems classify the groups of
central type of order p4 where p is a prime number.
Theorem 1. Let p be an odd prime. Up to isomorphism, the groups of central
type of order p4 are exactly the groups G(iii) , G(v) , G(viii) , G(xiv) , G(xv) in Table 1.
Theorem 2. Up to isomorphism, the groups of central type of order 16 are exactly
the groups G(iii) , G(v) , G(ix) , G(x) in Table 2.
In the proof of Theorem 1 and Theorem 2 we are basically using the following
three different methods:
Let G be a group of order p4 which is not of central type. Using Lemma 2.3,
Lemma 2.4 and [12, Theorem C]), which deal with groups of central type of any
order, we try to show that G is not a group of central type. If this fails, we
show, using alternative definition of nondegeneracy (see Definition 2.2), that for
any f ∈ Z 2 (G, C∗ ), the dimension of the center of Cf G is greater than 1.
In order to show that a group G of order p4 is of central type we construct a nondegenerate cohomology class [f ] ∈ H 2 (G, C∗ ). We do this by using a construction
of crossed product which arises from an action of a group H on a ring R by an
automorphism of R.
The twisted group algebra Cf G is equipped with a CG-module structure defined
by,
(2)
g(uh ) := ug uh u−1
g .
This furnishes Cf G with a G-module algebra structure.
For any G-module-algebra A over a field K, a nonzero element a ∈ A is called
semi-invariant if there exists λ ∈ Ĝ := Hom(G, K ∗ ) (the weight of a), such that for
any g ∈ G,
g(a) = λ(g) · a.
The subspace spanned by all the semi-invariant elements is a subalgebra of A called
the semi-center of A, and denoted by Sz(A) :=SzG (A). Then
Sz(A) = ⊕λ∈Ĝ Aλ ,
where Aλ is the subspace of all the semi-invariant elements in A of weight λ (and
zero). This is a natural grading of the semi-center by the group Ĝ of 1-dimensional
G-characters.
In the second part of this paper we study the semi-center of twisted group algebras under the conjugation action (2). Semi-invariants and the semi-center of
module-algebras are investigated mainly with regard to enveloping algebras of finite dimensional Lie algebras, see, e.g. [5, 9, 20], and with regard to group algebras,
see, e.g. [18, 21, 22]. In [12] Y. Ginosar and the author generalized a result of D.
SIMPLE TWISTED GROUP ALGEBRAS OF DIMENSION p4
3
Passman and P. Wauters (see [18]), by showing that if the Artin-Wedderburn decomposition of Cf G is
Cf G = ⊕ri=1 Mni (C),
then
Sz Cf G = ⊕ri=1 Cfi Gi ,
(3)
where the Gi ’s are subgroups of Ĝ, and fi ∈ Z 2 (Gi , C∗ ). In particular, if Cf G is
simple then its semi-center is a twisted group algebra, that is,
ˆ
Sz(Cf G) = Cf Ĝ.
(4)
We study the following problem.
Problem 1. Which cocycles f ∈ Z 2 (G, C∗ ) admit
(i) A commutative semi-center of Cf G?
(ii) A simple semi-center of Cf G?
By (3) a necessary condition for affirmative answer to Problem 1(ii) is that f is
nondegenerate. Regarding Problem 1(ii) we prove the following
Theorem 3. Let Cf G be a simple twisted group algebra. If the restriction of the
nondegenerate cocycle f to Gp is also nondegenerate then the semi-center of Cf G
is simple. In particular, if Gp is a Hall subgroup of G, then the semi-center of Cf G
is simple.
Problem 1(i) is particularly interesting when restricting to nondegenerate cocycles. By Theorem 1, the group G(xv) in Table 1 is of central type. In Theorem 5.1
we show that there exist a nondegenerate cocycle f ∈ Z 2 (G(xv) , C∗ ) such that
Sz(Cf G(xv) ) is commutative and in Proposition 5.3 we show that if G 6∼
= G(xv) is a
4
group of central type of order p , then for any nondegenerate cocycle f ∈ Z 2 (G, C∗ ),
Sz(Cf G) is non-commutative. We get the following theorem.
Theorem 4. Let G be a group of central type of order p4 where p is prime. There
exists a nondegenerate cocycle f ∈ Z 2 (G, C∗ ) such that Sz(Cf G) is commutative if
and only if p is odd and G is isomorphic to the group G(xv) in Table 1
In view of Theorem 4 and Remark 4.1, for any group of central type G, if
1 < |G| < 64, then the semi-center of simple twisted group algebras over G is noncommutative. In the following theorem we present a group G of order 64 such that
there exists a commutative semi-center of simple twisted group algebra over G.
Theorem 5. Let
(5)
G = hx1 , x2 , x3 , x4 , x5 , x6 i,
such that x1 , x2 , x3 are central and
x2i = 1,
[x4 , x5 ] = x1 ,
[x4 , x6 ] = x2 ,
2
[x5 , x6 ] = x3 .
There exists a nondegenerate cocycle f ∈ Z (G, C ) such that Sz(Cf G) is commutative.
∗
By Theorem 4 and Remark 4.1, the group G described in Theorem 5 is a minimal
non-trivial group with the property that the semi-center of a simple twisted group
algebra over a group is commutative.
4
OFIR SCHNABEL
Acknowledgements. A part of this paper appears in the author’s Ph.D. dissertation under the supervision of Y. Ginosar and the rest of this paper was influated
by it. The author is also grateful to F. Cedo, M. Kochetov and S. Koenig for their
valuable comments. Lastly, I want to thank the referee for reviewing the first draft
of this paper and for his valuable suggestions.
2. preliminaries
For any f ∈ Z 2 (G, C∗ ) define an antisymmetric form from the set of commuting
pairs in G to C∗ as follows:
(6)
αf (g1 , g2 ) := f (g1 , g2 )f (g2 , g1 )−1 .
If G is abelian group then αf determines the cohomology class of f . By the definition of αf , if [f1 ] = [f2 ] ∈ H 2 (G, C), then for every commuting elements g1 , g2 ∈ G,
αf1 (g1 , g2 ) = αf2 (g1 , g2 ). In other words, there is a well-defined function [f ] → αf
from H 2 (G, C) to the antisymmetric forms. Throughout this paper we will deal
with nondegeneracy of cocycles f using the notion of f -regularity.
Definition 2.1. [16, §2] Let f ∈ Z 2 (G, C∗ ). An element g ∈ G is called f -regular
if αf (g, h) = 1 for every h ∈ CG (g) (the centralizer of g ∈ G).
In other words, an element g ∈ G is f -regular if and only if for every element
h ∈ CG (g), ug uh = uh ug (see (1)) in the twisted group algebra Cf G. It is easy to
show that regularity is a class property, both cohomological and conjugacy.
It is well known that the dimension of the center of Cf G is equal to the number of
f -regular conjugacy classes of G (see [16, Theorem 2.4]). This leads to an alternative
definition of non-degeneracy of a 2-cocycle f ∈ Z 2 (G, C∗ ).
Definition 2.2. A 2-cocycle f ∈ Z 2 (G, C∗ ) is called non-degenerate if 1 ∈ G is the
only f -regular element in G.
We wish to formulate two known results which we will use in order to show that
some groups are not of central type.
Lemma 2.3. Let G be a group of central type. Then, CG (g) is non-cyclic for any
non-trivial element g ∈ G.
Proof. Since for any cocycle f ∈ Z 2 (G, C∗ ) and any h ∈ G, uh commutes with uhi ,
we conclude that if CG (g) = hhi, then g is f -regular. In particular, in this case,
there are no nondegenerate f ∈ Z 2 (G, C∗ ).
By [4, Proposition 1.2] if there
p exists a subgroup H of G such that the restriction
of f to H is trivial then |H| ≤ |G|. Since the cohomology of cyclic groups is trivial,
we obtain following lemma.
Lemma 2.4. Let G be a group of central type of order n2 . Then, the order of any
element in G is less or equal n.
Let G be a group. Denote by ◦(g) the order of g ∈ G. Since C is algebraically
closed we may always assume that for any f ∈ Z 2 (G, C∗ ),
(7)
ug◦(g) = 1
in the corresponding twisted group algebra Cf G. Therefore, since for any f ∈
Z 2 (G, C∗ )
[ug , 1] = 1,
SIMPLE TWISTED GROUP ALGEBRAS OF DIMENSION p4
5
in the corresponding twisted group algebra Cf G, the following lemma is clear.
Lemma 2.5. Let G be a finite group, let f ∈ Z 2 (G, C∗ ) and let a, b ∈ G be
commuting elements such that in the corresponding twisted group algebra Cf G,
[ua , ub ] = λ.
Then λ is a root of unity of order dividing the greatest common divisor of ◦(a) and
◦(b).
The concept of f -regularity is generalized bellow.
Definition 2.6. [N. Ben David] Let f ∈ Z 2 (G, C∗ ) and let λ ∈ Ĝ. An element
x ∈ G is called (λ, f )-regular if for any g ∈ CG (x),
λ(g) = αf (g, x).
As before, (λ, f )-regularity is a class property (conjugacy and cohomology). In
particular, an element is f -regular if it is (1, f )-regular. Let f ∈ Z 2 (G, C∗ ), λ ∈ Ĝ
and let x ∈ G be a (λ, f )-regular element. Assume T = {1, t2 , . . . , tn } is a left
transversal of CG (x). Denote
(8)
S(λ,x) =
n
X
λ−1 (ti )uti ux u−1
ti .
i=1
Proposition 2.7 which gives a complete description of the weight spaces (Cf G)λ ,
and Lemma 2.8 claiming that any central element in G induce a semi-invariant
element in Cf G were both proven in [12].
Proposition 2.7. [12, Proposition 6.2] With the above notation,
(9)
(Cf G)λ = spanC {S(λ,x) | x is (λ, f )-regular}.
Lemma 2.8. Let G be a group with center Z(G). For every element x ∈ Z(G)
and f ∈ Z 2 (G, C∗ ) the element ux is semi-invariant in Cf G. In particular, for any
abelian group G, and any 2-cocycle f ∈ Z 2 (G, C∗ ),
Sz(Cf G) = Cf G.
We will also use in the sequel the following estimation of the dimension of the
semi-center of twisted group algebras.
Corollary 2.9. (see [12, Corollary 6.5]) For any f ∈ Z 2 (G, C∗ ), let
[
Γ(f ) =
Γ(λ, f )
λ∈Ĝ
be a set of representatives of the (λ, f )-regular conjugacy classes for all λ ∈ Ĝ.
Then
X
[G : G′ CG (x)].
dimC Sz(Cf G) =
x∈Γ(f )
6
OFIR SCHNABEL
3. Classification of groups of central type of order p4
In this section we prove Theorem 1 and Theorem 2. Throughout this section
we will use the classification (and numbering) of groups of order p4 , which can be
found in Table 1 for the odd case and Table 2 for the even case.
At first we will handle the odd and the even case simultaneously (groups G(i) G(vii) ). However, at some point (from group G(viii) and forward) we will separate
between the cases.
We start from the well known abelian case. Abelian groups of central type are
exactly groups of the form A × A, that is the direct sum of two copies of the same
abelian group (see [2, Theorem 5]). In particular, the abelian groups of central type
of order p4 are
(10)
Cp × Cp × Cp × Cp and Cp2 × Cp2 .
This shows that from the groups G(i) -G(v) in both Table 1 and Table 2, the groups
of central type are G(iii) and G(v) .
We now start dealing with the non-abelian case. The group G(vi) (in both tables)
admits a cyclic subgroup of order p3 and hence by Lemma 2.4 it is not of central
type.
In the group G(vii) , the center is hai ∼
= Cp2 and the commutator subgroup of G(vii)
is hap i. Therefore, the group of 1-dimensional characters of G(vii) is isomorphic
to Cp3 . Hence, there is no embedding of the center of G(vii) in the group of 1dimensional characters of G(vii) . Consequently, by [12, Theorem C] this group is
not of central type.
It turns out that the group G(viii) is of central type in the odd case and is not of
central type in the even case. From now on we will separate between the odd case
and the even case.
3.1. p is odd. In this section we complete the proof of Theorem 1. The numbering
of the groups in this section is with respect to Table 1. We start by showing that
the group G(viii) is of central type. In order to do so we will use a construction
of crossed product which arises from an action of a group G on a ring R by an
automorphism of R.
Theorem 3.1. Let G = ha, bi be a group of order p4 such that
2
2
ap = bp = 1,
[a, b] = ap .
Then G is a group of central type.
Proof. We wish to construct a nondegenerate cohomology class [f ] ∈ H 2 (G, C∗ ).
This twisted group algebra Cf G is generated as algebra by ua , ub such that
(11)
2
2
upa = upb = 1.
We use a construction of crossed product in the following way. Consider the following Cp2 = hbi-action on the commutative group algebra R1 = Chai.
ψb :R1 → R1
ua 7→ ζp2 up+1
a
where ζp2 is a root of unit of order p2 . By setting ψb (uia ) = ψb (ua )i we ensure that
ψb is a homomorphism of R1 .
SIMPLE TWISTED GROUP ALGEBRAS OF DIMENSION p4
7
Next, we check that the order of the automorphism ψb is p2 . By induction it is
easy to show that
(k+p
ψbk (ua ) = ζp2
(12)
Pk−1
i=1
i) kp+1
ua
) kp+1
(k+ k(k−1)p
2
ua .
= ζp2
Then, since ua has order p2 , if
(k+ k(k−1)p
) kp+1
2
ψbk (ua ) = ζp2
ua
= ua
then k ≡ 0(mod p).
Assume now that k = ip. If i 6≡ 0(mod p) then
k(k − 1)p
ip(ip − 1)p
= ip +
6≡ 0(mod p2 ).
2
2
Therefore, since ζp2 has order p2 , if ψbk (ua ) = ua then k ≡ 0(mod p2 ). Consequently,
the order of ψb is at least p2 . By putting k = p2 in (12) we get
k+
2
2 2
p2 + p (p 2−1)p
ψbp (ua ) = ζp2
3
upa
+1
2
p2 1+ (p −1)p
2
= ζp2
ua = ua .
We conclude that ψb is an automorphism of R1 of order p2 .
Since ψb is an automorphism of the ring R1 , the ring R generated by ua , ub is
a crossed product of Cp2 = hub i over R1 . In particular it is an associative algebra.
Hence the ring R is an associative complex algebra generated by ua , ub with the
following relations:
2
2
upa = upb = 1,
p
ua ub u−1
a = ζp2 ub ua .
The associativity of R ensures that there exists a cocycle f ∈ Z 2 (G, C∗ ) which
satisfies the above relations. We show that f is nondegenerate by showing that
there are no non-trivial f -regular elements in G. Since ψb has order p2 ,
p
p
ψbp (ua ) = u−p
b ua ub 6= ua ⇒ [ua , ub ] 6= 1.
Since bp ∈ CG (a) we conclude that a and bp are not f -regular. On the other hand,
p
by using the equality ua ub u−1
a = ζp2 ub ua , it is easy to prove by induction that
k
kp
uka ub u−k
a = ζp2 ub ua .
In particular, for k = p we get
2
p
p
p
p
upa ub u−p
a = ζp2 ub ua = ζp2 ub 6= ub ⇒ [ua , ub ] 6= 1.
Since ap ∈ CG (b) we conclude that b and ap are not f -regular.
Now, let x = ai bj ∈ G be an f -regular element. If j 6≡ 0(mod p) then [ux , upa ] 6= 1
while ap ∈ CG (x). Hence we may assume that j ≡ 0(mod p).
If j ≡ 0(mod p) and j 6≡ 0(mod p2 ), then [ux , ua ] 6= 1 while a ∈ CG (x). Hence we
may assume that j = 0 and x = ai .
If i 6≡ 0(mod p) then [ux , upb ] 6= 1 while bp ∈ CG (x). Hence we may assume that
i ≡ 0(mod p).
But then if i ≡ 0(mod p) and i 6≡ 0(mod p2 ), then [ux , ub ] 6= 1 while b ∈ CG (x) and
therefore x is trivial. Consequently, f is nondegenerate and G is a group of central
type.
It turns out that the group G(ix) is of central type in the even case and is not of
central type in the odd case. The main reason for that is related to the following
number-theoretical lemma.
8
OFIR SCHNABEL
Lemma 3.2. Let p be a prime number. Then, p3 is a divisor of (p + 1)p − 1 if and
only if p = 2.
Proof. One direction is clear. Namely, 23 = 32 − 1.
Assume now that p is an odd prime. We prove that (p + 1)p − 1 ≡ p2 ( mod p3 ).
By the binomial identity
p
X
p i
p
p.
(p + 1) − 1 =
i
i=1
Consequently,
p 2
(p + 1) − 1 ≡
p + p2 ( mod p3 ).
2
Since p is odd we conclude that p2 p2 ≡ 0( mod p3 ) and the result follows.
p
The following lemma shows that the group G(ix) is not of central type.
Lemma 3.3. Let G = ha, b, ci be a group of order p4 such that
2
ap = bp = cp = 1,
[a, b] = [b, c] = 1, [a, c] = ap .
Then, for any cocycle f ∈ Z 2 (G, C∗ ), the element ap is f -regular. In particular, G
is not a group of central type.
Proof. Let f ∈ Z 2 (G, C∗ ), and assume that
[ua , ub ] = δ, [ub , uc ] = λ, [ua , uc ] = γupa .
By Lemma 2.5, δ and λ are both p-th roots of unity. Therefore,
[upa , ub ] = δ p = 1.
(13)
Consequently, if [upa , uc ] = 1, then ap is f -regular and the proof is completed. Using
p
the equality ua uc u−1
a = γua uc we compute
(14)
−(k−1) −1
−(k−1) −1
[uka , uc ] = uak−1 ua uc u−1
uc = uak−1 (ua uc u−1
uc =
a ua
a )ua
p k−1
p k−1
uak−1 (γupa uc )u−(k−1)
u−1
uc u−(k−1)
u−1
, uc ].
a
c = γua ua
a
c = γua [ua
Therefore, by induction
[uka , uc ] = γ k upk
a .
(15)
In particular, by putting k = p in (21) we get
(16)
2
[upa , uc ] = γ p upa = γ p .
Now, in order to prove that uap is f -regular we need to show that γ is a p-th root
of unity.
Since ap and c commutes in G, then by Lemma 2.5, γ is a root of unity of order
dividing p2 . By raising both sides of
−1 1−p
uc ua u−1
ua
c =γ
to the p + 1 power we get that
−1
−(p+1)
uc up+1
ua ,
a uc = γ
and therefore
p+1 p+1
u−1
ua .
c ua uc = γ
SIMPLE TWISTED GROUP ALGEBRAS OF DIMENSION p4
9
From here, by induction it is easy to prove that
k
u−k
c ua uc = γ
(17)
Pk
i=1 (p+1)
i
((p+1)k )
.
ua
2
Since upc = upa = 1, then by putting k = p in (17) we get
(18)
p
ua = u−p
c ua uc = γ
Pp
i=1 (p+1)
i
ua((p+1)
p
)
=γ
(p+1)[(p+1)p −1]
p
ua .
p
−1
and therefore, since p + 1 is prime to
By Lemma 3.2, p2 is not a divisor of (p+1)
p
p, the order of γ is not p2 . We conclude that γ is a p-th root of unity and therefore
by (13) and (16) ap is f -regular which completes the proof.
Similarly to the case of group G(ix) , it turns out that the group G(x) is of central
type in the even case and is not of central type in the odd case.
Lemma 3.4. Let G = ha, b, ci be a group of order p4 such that
2
ap = bp = cp = 1,
2
[a, b] = [b, c] = 1, [a, c] = b.
Then, for any cocycle f ∈ Z (G, C ), the element ap is f -regular. In particular, G
is not a group of central type.
∗
Proof. Let f ∈ Z 2 (G, C∗ ), and assume that [ua , ub ] = δ and [ub , uc ] = λ. By
Lemma 2.5, δ and λ are both p-th roots of unity. Therefore,
[upa , ub ] = δ p = 1.
(19)
Assume now that [ua , uc ] = γub . We show that γ is also a p-th root of unity.
We use the equalities
−1
−1
uc u−1
a uc = γua ub
−1 −1
and ub u−1
uc ub
c = λ
in order to show the following equality:
−1 −(k−1)
−1 −(k−1)
=
= ua uck−1 (uc u−1
[ua , ukc ] = ua uck−1 uc u−1
a uc )uc
a uc uc
−(k−1)
−(k−1) −(k−1)
ua uck−1 (γu−1
= γua uck−1 u−1
λ
ub = γλ−(k−1) [ua , uck−1 ]ub .
a ub )uc
a uc
Therefore, by induction
(20)
[ua , ukc ] = γ k λ−(
Pk
i−1) k
ub
p
uc = 1,
i=1
Consequently, since p is odd and since
= γ k λ−
k(k−1)
2
ukb .
by putting k = p in (20) we get
1 = [ua , 1] = [ua , upc ] = γ p λ
p(p−1)
2
upb = γ p .
We conclude that γ is also a p-th root of unity.
Now, using the equalities
ua uc u−1
a = γub uc
and ua ub = δub ua
we compute
−(k−1) −1
−(k−1) −1
[uka , uc ] = uak−1 ua uc u−1
uc = uak−1 (ua uc u−1
uc =
a ua
a )ua
k−1
k−1
uak−1 (γub uc )u−(k−1)
u−1
ub uak−1 uc u−(k−1)
u−1
ub [uak−1 , uc ].
a
c = γδ
a
c = γδ
Therefore, by induction
(21)
[uka , uc ] = γ k δ (
Pk
Consequently, since p is odd and since
(22)
i−1) k
ub
p
ub = 1,
i=1
[upa , uc ] = γ p δ
p(p−1)
2
= γkδ
k(k−1)
2
ukb .
by putting k = p in (21) we get
upb = 1.
10
OFIR SCHNABEL
Hence, by (19) and (22) we conclude that ap is f -regular which completes the
proof.
The groups G(xi) , G(xii) , G(xiii) are not of central type. In these groups the element a has the property that CG (a) = hai and therefore by Lemma 2.3 these groups
are not of central type.
Next, we show that the group G(xiv) is of central type.
Theorem 3.5. Let G = ha, b, c, di be a group of order p4 such that
ap = bp = cp = dp = 1,
[a, b] = [a, c] = [a, d] = [b, c] = [b, d] = 1,
[c, d] = a.
Then G is a group of central type.
Proof. First, notice that
Z(G) = ha, bi, CG (c) = ha, b, ci, CG (d) = ha, b, di.
We wish to construct a nondegenerate cohomology class [f ] ∈ H 2 (G, C∗ ). This
twisted group algebra Cf G is generated as algebra by ua , ub , uc , ud such that
(23)
upa = upb = upc = upd = 1.
We use a construction of crossed product in the following way. Consider the following Cp = hci-action on the commutative group algebra CZ(G).
ψc :CZ(G) → CZ(G)
ua 7→ ζp ua
ub 7→ ub
where ζp is a p-th root of unity. Clearly, ψc is an automorphism of order p of the
ring CZ(G) and therefore the ring R1 generated by ua , ub , uc is a crossed product
of Cp = huc i over CZ(G). In particular it is an associative algebra. Consider the
following Cp = hdi-action on R1 .
ψd :R1 → R1
ua 7→ ua
ub 7→ ζp ub
uc 7→ ua uc .
We will show that ψd is an automorphism of order p of the ring R1 . We need to
check if the following equalities hold:
−1
(1) ψd (ub ua u−1
.
b ) = ψd (ub )ψd (ua )ψd (ub )
−1
(2) ψd (uc ua uc ) = ψd (uc )ψd (ua )ψd (uc )−1 .
−1
(3) ψd (uc ub u−1
.
c ) = ψd (uc )ψd (ub )ψd (uc )
Indeed,
(1)
ψd (ub ua ub−1 ) = ψd (ua ) = ua ,
and on the other hand,
ψd (ub )ψd (ua )ψd (ub )−1 = (ζp ub )ua (ζp ub )−1 = ua .
SIMPLE TWISTED GROUP ALGEBRAS OF DIMENSION p4
11
(2)
−1
−1
ψd (uc ua u−1
c ) = ψd (ζp ua ) = ζp ua ,
and on the other hand,
−1
−1
−1
−1
ψd (uc )ψd (ua )ψd (uc )−1 = ua uc ua (ua uc )−1 = ua (uc ua u−1
c )ua = ua ζp ua ua = ζp ua .
(3)
ψd (uc ub u−1
c ) = ψd (ub ) = ζp ub ,
and on the other hand,
−1
−1
ψd (uc )ψd (ub )ψd (uc )−1 = (ua uc )ζp ub (ua uc )−1 = ζp ua (uc ub u−1
c )ua = ζp ua ub ua = ζp ub .
We now need to check that ψd has order p. Clearly,
ψdp (ua ) = ua and ψdp (ub ) = ub .
Notice that
ψdk (uc ) = ψdk−1 (ua uc ) = ψdk−1 (ua )ψdk−1 (uc ) = ua ψdk−1 (uc ) = . . . = uka uc .
Therefore,
ψdp (uc ) = upa uc = uc .
Since ψd is an automorphism of the ring R1 we conclude that the ring R generated
by ua , ub , uc , ud is a crossed product of Cp = hud i over R1 . In particular it is an
associative algebra. Hence the ring R is an associative complex algebra generated
by ua , ub , uc , ud with the following relations.
upa = upb = upc = upd = 1
[ua , ub ] = [ua , ud ] = [ub , uc ] = 1, [ua , uc ] = ζp , [ub , ud ] = ζp , [uc , ud ] = ua .
The associativity of R ensures that there exists a cocycle f ∈ Z 2 (G, C∗ ) which
satisfies the above relations. We show that f is nondegenerate by showing that
there are no non-trivial f -regular elements in G.
Assume that x = ar1 br2 cr3 dr4 ∈ G is an f -regular element. If r4 6= 0 then
[ub , ux ] 6= 1 while b ∈ CG (x) and hence we can assume that x = ar1 br2 cr3 .
Then, if r3 6= 0 then [ua , ux ] 6= 1 while a ∈ CG (x) and hence we can assume that
x = ar1 b r2 .
Then, if r2 6= 0 then [ud , ux ] 6= 1 while d ∈ CG (x) and hence we can assume that
x = ar1 .
But then, if r1 6= 0 then [uc , ux ] 6= 1 while c ∈ CG (x) and hence we get that x is
trivial and therefore f is nondegenerate.
Next, we show that the group G(xv) is of central type in the p > 3 case and in
the p = 3 case.
Theorem 3.6. For prime p ≥ 5, let G be a group of order p4 generated by four
elements {a, b, c, d} with the following relations,
ap = bp = cp = dp = 1, [a, b] = [a, c] = [a, d] = [b, c] = 1, [d, b] = a, [d, c] = b.
And for p = 3, G15 let G be a group of order 81 generated by three elements {a, b, c}
with the following relations,
a9 = b3 = c3 = 1, [a, b] = 1, cac−1 = ab, cbc−1 = a6 b.
Then, the groups G are of central type.
12
OFIR SCHNABEL
Proof. We start with the case where p ≥ 5. First, notice that Z(G) = hai and Gp =
ha, bi. We wish to construct a nondegenerate cohomology class [f ] ∈ H 2 (G, C∗ )
such that the restriction of [f ] to Gp is trivial. This twisted group algebra Cf G is
generated as algebra by ua , ub , uc , ud such that
upa = upb = upc = upd = 1.
We use a construction of crossed product in the following way. First we define a
cohomology class [α] over the subgroup H := ha, b, ci using the following relations.
[α] :
[ua , ub ] = [ua , uc ] = 1, [uc , ub ] = ζp ,
where ζp is a p-th root of unit. Consider the following Cp = hdi-action on Cα H.
ψd :Cα H → Cα H
ua 7→ ζp ua
ub →
7 ua ub
uc →
7 ub uc .
We will show that ψd is an automorphism of order p of the ring Cα H. We need to
check if the following equalities hold.
−1
(1) ψd (ub ua u−1
.
b ) = ψd (ub )ψd (ua )ψd (ub )
−1
(2) ψd (uc ua u−1
)
=
ψ
(u
)ψ
(u
)ψ
(u
)
.
d c
d a
d c
c
−1
)
=
ψ
(u
)ψ
(u
)ψ
(u
)
.
(3) ψd (uc ub u−1
d c
d b
d c
c
Indeed,
(1) ψd (ub ua u−1
b ) = ψd (ua ) = ζp ua ,
and on the other hand,
ψd (ub )ψd (ua )ψd (ub )−1 = ua ub ζp ua (ua ub )−1 = ζp ua .
(2) ψd (uc ua u−1
c ) = ψd (ua ) = ζp ua ,
and on the other hand,
ψd (uc )ψd (ua )ψd (uc )−1 = ub uc ζp ua (ub uc )−1 = ζp ua .
(3) ψd (uc ub u−1
c ) = ψd (ζp ub ) = ζp ua ub ,
and on the other hand,
ψd (uc )ψd (ub )ψd (uc )−1 = ub uc ua ub (ub uc )−1 = ua ub [uc , ub ] = ζp ua ub .
We now need to check that ψd has order p. Clearly
ψdp (ua ) = ζpp ua = ua .
Notice that
ψdk (ub ) = ψdk−1 (ua ub ) = ψdk−1 (ua )ψdk−1 (ub ) = . . .
k−1
k−1
Y
Y
k(k−1)
i
i
ζp ua ub = ζp 2 uka ub .
ψd (ua ) ub =
=
i=0
i=0
Therefore,
p(p−1)
ψdp (ub ) = ζp 2 upa ub = ub .
In order to show that ψdp (uc ) = uc we will use two observations. First, it is easy to
prove by induction that for any natural n ≥ 1,
(n + 1)n n(n − 1)
2·1
(n + 2)(n + 1)n
+
+ ...+
=
.
2
2
2
6
SIMPLE TWISTED GROUP ALGEBRAS OF DIMENSION p4
13
Second, for any prime number p ≥ 5
p(p − 1)(p − 2)
6
is divisible by p. We will also use that ua and ub commute. Now,
p−1
Y
p
p−1
p−1
p−1
i
ψd (ub ) uc =
ψd (uc ) = ψd (ub uc ) = ψd (ub )ψd (uc ) = . . . =
i=0
p−1
Y
i=0
i(i−1)
2
ζp
Pp−1 i(i−1) Pp−1
p(p−1)
p(p−1)(p−2)
i
6
uia ub uc = ζp i=0 2 ua i=0 upb uc = ζp
ua 2 = uc .
Since ψd is an automorphism of the ring Cα H we conclude that the ring R generated by ua , ub , uc , ud is a crossed product of Cp over Cα H. In particular it is an
associative algebra. Hence the ring R is an associative complex algebra generated
by ua , ub , uc , ud with the following relations.
(24) [ua , ub ] = [ua , uc ] = 1, [ud , ua ] = ζp , [uc , ub ] = ζp , [ud , ub ] = ua , [ud , uc ] = ub .
The associativity of R ensures that there exists a cocycle f ∈ Z 2 (G, C∗ ) which
satisfies the above relations. We show that f is nondegenerate by showing that
there are no non-trivial f -regular elements in G. Assume that x = ar1 br2 cr3 dr4 ∈ G
is an f -regular element. If r4 6= 0 then [ua , ux ] 6= 1 while a ∈ CG (x) and hence we
can assume that x = ar1 br2 cr3 . Then, if r3 6= 0 then [ub , ux ] 6= 1 while b ∈ CG (x)
and hence we can assume that x = ar1 br2 . Then, if r2 6= 0 then [uc , ux ] 6= 1 while
c ∈ CG (x) and hence we can assume that x = ar1 . But then, if r1 6= 0 then
[ud , ux ] 6= 1 while d ∈ CG (x) and hence we get that x is trivial and therefore f is
nondegenerate.
The case p = 3 is done in a similar way. We start by defining a cohomology class
[β] over the commutative group H = ha, bi as follows.
[β] :
[ua , ub ] = ζ3 ,
where ζ3 is a root of unity of order 3. Then we define a hci-action on Cβ H by
ψc :Cα H → Cα H
ua 7→ ζ9 ub ua
ub 7→ u6a ub ,
where ζ9 is a root of unity of order 9. We check that indeed ψc is an automorphism
of order 3 of the ring Cβ H and consequently we get an associative ring R spanned
by ua , ub , uc with the following relations
u9a = u3b = u3c = 1, [ua , ub ] = ζ3 , [uc , ua ] = ζ9 ub , [uc , ub ] = u6a .
The associativity of R ensures that there exists a cocycle f ∈ Z 2 (G, C∗ ) which
satisfies the above relations. We show that f is nondegenerate by showing that
there are no non-trivial f -regular elements in G. Notice that
CG (a) = CG (b) = ha, bi, CG (c) = hc, a3 i.
Assume that x = ai bj ck ∈ G is an f -regular element. If k 6= 0 then [ua3 , ux ] 6= 1
while a3 ∈ CG (x) and hence we can assume that x = ai bj . If j 6= 0 then [ua , ux ] 6= 1
while a ∈ CG (x) and hence we can assume that x = ai . But then, if i 6= 0 then
[ub , ux ] 6= 1 while b ∈ CG (x) and hence we get that x is trivial and therefore f is
nondegenerate.
14
OFIR SCHNABEL
This completes the proof of Theorem 1.
3.2. p is even. In this section we complete the proof of Theorem 2. All the numbering in this section are with correspondence with Table 2. Recall that we already proved that from the groups G(i) -G(vii) , the only groups of central type are
G(iii) , G(v) .
We start this section by showing that the group G(viii) is not of central type.
Lemma 3.7. Let G = ha, bi be a group of order 16 such that
a4 = b4 = 1,
[a, b] = a2 .
Then, for any cocycle f ∈ Z 2 (G, C∗ ), the element b2 is f -regular. In particular, G
is not a group of central type.
Proof. Let f ∈ Z 2 (G, C∗ ), and assume that
[ua , ub ] = δu2a .
Then
(25)
ua ub ua−1 = δu2a ub .
Since a2 and b commutes in G, then by Lemma 2.5, δ is a root of unity of order
dividing 4. Therefore, using (25) we get
(26)
2
2
2 2
2
2 2 2 2
4
ua u2b u−1
a = (δua ub ) = δ ua (ub ua )ub = δ ua (δ ua ub )ub = δ = 1.
Therefore, b2 is an f -regular element in G. Moreover, ub is a nontrivial central
element in Cf G and hence the group G is not of central type
Next, we show that the group G(xi) is of central type.
Theorem 3.8. Let G = ha, b, ci be a group of order 16 such that
a4 = b2 = c2 = 1,
[a, b] = [b, c] = 1,
[a, c] = a2 .
Then G is a group of central type.
Proof. We wish to construct a nondegenerate cohomology class [f ] ∈ H 2 (G, C∗ ).
The corresponding twisted group algebra Cf G is generated as algebra by ua , ub , uc
such that
(27)
u4a = u2b = u2c = 1.
We use a construction of crossed product in the following way. We start from the
twisted group algebra R1 = Cα ha, bi, where [α] ∈ H 2 (ha, bi, C∗ ) is defined by the
relation
[ua , ub ] = −1.
Consider the following C2 = hci-action on R1 .
ψc :R1 → R1
ua 7→ iu3a
ub 7→ ub .
By setting ψc (uja ) = ψc (ua )j we ensure that ψc is a homomorphism of R1 .
Next, we check that the automorphism ψc has order 2. Clearly ψc2 (ub ) = ub .
Now,
(28)
ψc2 (ua ) = ψc (iu3a ) = iψc (ua )3 = i · i3 u9a = ua .
SIMPLE TWISTED GROUP ALGEBRAS OF DIMENSION p4
15
We conclude that indeed ψc is an automorphism of order 2 of R1 .
Since ψc is an automorphism of the ring R1 , the ring R generated by ua , ub , uc
is a crossed product of C2 = huc i over R1 . In particular it is an associative algebra.
Hence the ring R is an associative complex algebra generated by ua , ub , uc with the
following relations.
u4a = u2b = u2c = 1,
[ua , ub ] = −1, [uc, ub ] = 1, [uc , ua ] = iu2a .
The associativity of R ensures that there exists a cocycle f ∈ Z 2 (G, C∗ ) which
satisfies the above relations. We show that f is nondegenerate by showing that
there are no non-trivial f -regular elements in G.
Let x = at bj ck ∈ G be an f -regular element. If k 6= 0 then [ux , u2a ] 6= 1 while
2
a ∈ CG (x). Hence we may assume that k = 0 and x = at bj .
If j 6= 0 then [ux , ua ] 6= 1 while a ∈ CG (x). Hence we may assume that j = 0 and
x = at .
If t is odd, then [ux , ub ] 6= 1 while b ∈ CG (x). Hence we may assume that t is even.
But then, if t ≡ 2(mod 4), then [ux , uc ] 6= 1 while c ∈ CG (x) and therefore x is
trivial. We conclude that f is nondegenerate and G is a group of central type.
Next, we show that the group G(x) is of central type.
Theorem 3.9. Let G = ha, b, ci be a group of order 16 such that
a4 = b2 = c2 = 1,
[a, b] = [b, c] = 1,
[a, c] = b.
Then G is a group of central type.
Proof. We wish to construct a nondegenerate cohomology class [f ] ∈ H 2 (G, C∗ ).
The corresponding twisted group algebra Cf G is generated as algebra by ua , ub , uc
such that
u4a = u2b = u2c = 1.
(29)
We use a construction of crossed product in the following way. We start from the
twisted group algebra R1 = Cα ha, bi, where [α] ∈ H 2 (ha, bi, C∗ ) is defined by the
relation
[α] : [ua , ub ] = −1.
Consider the following C2 = hci-action on R1 .
ψc :R1 → R1
ua 7→ −ub ua
ub 7→ ub ,
and ψc (uja ) = ψc (ua )j , ψc (ujb ) = ψc (ub )j .
We will show that ψc is an automorphism of order 2 of the ring R1 . We need to
check if the following equality holds:
−1
ψc (ua ub u−1
.
a ) = ψc (ua )ψc (ub )ψc (ua )
Indeed,
ψc (ua ub u−1
a ) = ψc (−ub ) = −ub ,
and on the other hand
ψc (ua )ψc (ub )ψc (ua )−1 = (−ub ua )(ub )(−u3a ub ) = −ub .
16
OFIR SCHNABEL
Next, we check that the automorphism ψc has order 2. Clearly ψc2 (ub ) = ub .
Now,
(30)
ψc2 (ua ) = ψc (−ub ua ) = −ψc (ua )ψc (ub ) = −(−ua ub )(ub ) = ua .
We conclude that indeed ψc is an automorphism of order 2 of R1 .
Since ψc is an automorphism of the ring R1 , the ring R generated by ua , ub , uc
is a crossed product of C2 = huc i over R1 . In particular it is an associative algebra.
Hence the ring R is an associative complex algebra generated by ua , ub , uc with the
following relations.
u4a = u2b = u2c = 1,
[ua , ub ] = −1, [uc , ub ] = 1, [uc , ua ] = −ub .
The associativity of R ensures that there exists a cocycle f ∈ Z 2 (G, C∗ ) which
satisfies the above relations. We show that f is nondegenerate by showing that
there are no non-trivial f -regular elements in G.
Let x = at bj ck ∈ G be an f -regular element. If k 6= 0 then [ux , u2a ] 6= 1 while
2
a ∈ CG (x). Hence we may assume that k = 0 and x = at bj .
If j 6= 0 then [ux , ua ] 6= 1 while a ∈ CG (x). Hence we may assume that j = 0 and
x = at .
If t is odd, then [ux , ub ] 6= 1 while b ∈ CG (x). Hence we may assume that t is even.
But then, if t ≡ 2(mod 4), then [ux , uc ] 6= 1 while c ∈ CG (x) and therefore x is
trivial. We conclude that f is nondegenerate and G is a group of central type.
Next, we show that the group G(xi) is not of central type.
Lemma 3.10. Let G = ha, b, ci be a group of order 16 such that
a4 = c2 = 1,
a2 = b 2 ,
[a, c] = [b, c] = 1, [a, b] = a2 .
Then, for any cocycle f ∈ Z 2 (G, C∗ ), the element a2 is f -regular. In particular, G
is not a group of central type.
Proof. Let f ∈ Z 2 (G, C∗ ) and assume that [ua , uc ] = δ. By Lemma 2.5, δ ∈ {1, −1}.
In particular,
(31)
[ua2 , uc ] = 1.
2
Hence, in order to show that a is f -regular, we need to show that [ua2 , ub ] = 1.
Since [a, b] = a2 , there exists a scalar γ such that
[ua , ub ] = γu2a ,
−1
or equivalently, ub u−1
a ub = γua . Therefore,
(32)
−2 −1
−2 −1
−1 −1 2
2 2
u2a = u2b = u−2
b = ub ub ub = ub ua ub = (ub ua ub ) = γ ua .
Consequently, γ ∈ {1, −1}. Hence,
(33)
−1
2
−1 −1
−1 −1
2
−1 −1 2
[u2a , ub ] = u2a (ub u−2
a ub ) = ua (ub ua ub ub ua ub ) = ua (ub ua ub ) = 1.
Therefore, by (31) and (33), a2 is f -regular and hence f is not nondegenerate.
Finally, the groups G(xii) , G(xiii) , G(xiv) admit a cyclic subgroup of order 8 and
hence by Lemma 2.4 these groups are not of central type..
This completes the proof of Theorem 2.
SIMPLE TWISTED GROUP ALGEBRAS OF DIMENSION p4
17
4. The semi-center of simple twisted group algebra
We use the fact that the partition of a group G to conjugacy classes refines the
partition of G to cosets of the commutator Gp . Let f ∈ Z 2 (G, C∗ ) be a nondegenerate cocycle. By (4), for every λ ∈ Ĝ, dim((Cf G)λ ) = 1. Hence, the support of any
element in (Cf G)λ is a unique conjugacy class of G, say [x]. Define the following
group homomorphism.
(34)
ϕ = ϕ(f ) : Ĝ → G/Gp
λ 7→ xGp .
Let λ0 ∈ Ĝ. By [12, (25)] it can easily be verified that λ0 (x) = 1 for every x ∈ Γ(f )
(see Corollary 2.9) if and only if λ0 ∈ker(ϕ). Therefore,
(35)
ˆ
Cf ker(ϕ) = Z(Sz(Cf G)).
Next, we prove Theorem 3. We show that if Cf G is a simple twisted group algebra
and the restriction of f to Gp , which we denote by f p , is also nondegenerate then
the semi-center of Cf G is simple. In particular, if Gp is a Hall subgroup of G, then
the semi-center of Cf G is simple.
Proof of Theorem 3.
First, we show that if there are no non-trivial (λ, f )-regular conjugacy classes contained in Gp then the semi-center of Cf G is simple. Notice that in this case, the
associated kernel of ϕ (see (34)) is trivial. Hence, by (35) we conclude that the center of Sz(Cf G) is one dimensional and as a consequence the semi-center of (Cf G)
is simple.
Next, we show that there are no non-trivial (λ, f )-regular conjugacy class contained in Gp . Assume that [g] ⊆ Gp is a (λ, f )-regular conjugacy class. Let
x ∈ CGp (g), in particular x ∈ Gp . Therefore, δ(x) = 1 for any δ ∈ Ĝ. Since g
is a (λ, f )-regular element in G,
αf (g, x) = αf p (g, x) = λ(x) = 1.
Hence, g is an f p -regular element. By the nondegeneracy of f p we conclude that
g = 1. Therefore, there are no non-trivial (λ, f )-regular conjugacy class contained
in Gp . Hence, by the first part the semi-center of is simple. By [8, Corollary 4] the
restriction of a nondegenerate cocycle to any Hall subgroup is also nondegenerate.
Hence, by the first part, if Gp is a Hall subgroup of G, then the semi-center of Cf G
is simple.
Remark 4.1. Let G be a group of central type of order n2 where n is square-free
number. In [11] we show that in this case Gp is a Hall subgroup of G. Hence, by
Theorem 3 the semi-center of Cf G is simple.
Corollaries 4.2, 4.3 deal with two extremes of ker(ϕ) (see (34)). Either ker(ϕ) is
trivial or ker(ϕ) = Ĝ. These extremes correspond to the two extremes presented in
Problem 1 for nondegenerate cocycles.
Corollary 4.2. Let f ∈ Z 2 (G, C∗ ) be a nondegenerate cocycle. With the above
notations the following are equivalent.
(1) ker(ϕ) is trivial. In other words, there are no non-trivial (λ, f )-regular
conjugacy classes contained in Gp .
(2) ϕ is an isomorphism.
18
OFIR SCHNABEL
ˆ
(3) Sz(Cf G) = Cf Ĝ is simple. In other words, fˆ ∈ Z 2 (Ĝ, C∗ ) is a nondegenerate cocycle, and in particular, Ĝ is a group of central type.
∼ G/Gp , ker(ϕ) is trivial if and only if ϕ is an isomorphism. By
Proof. Since Ĝ =
ˆ
equation (35), ker(ϕ) is trivial if and only if the center of Cf Ĝ is one dimensional
and hence fˆ is nondegenerate cocycle.
The other extreme is giving as follows.
Corollary 4.3. Let f ∈ Z 2 (G, C∗ ) be a nondegenerate cocycle. With the above
notations the following are equivalent.
(1) ker(ϕ) = Ĝ. In other words, all the (λ, f )-regular conjugacy classes are
contained in Gp .
(2) fˆ is cohomologically trivial.
ˆ
(3) Sz(Cf G) = Cf Ĝ is commutative.
(4) With the notations of Corollary 2.9,
X
[G : G′ CG (x)] = |Ĝ|.
x∈Γ(f )∩Gp
Moreover, if these conditions hold then Z(G) ≤ Gp .
Proof. We first show that the second and the third conditions are equivalent. Asˆ
sume that Cf Ĝ is commutative. Then, since the order of the cohomology class
[f ] ∈ H 2 (G, C∗ ) divides the dimension of each projective f -representation (see [1,
p.406, Remark]) fˆ is cohomologically trivial. On the other hand, since Ĝ is comˆ
mutative, if fˆ is cohomologically trivial, then Cf Ĝ is commutative. Next, we show
that the first and the third conditions are equivalent. Since f is nondegenerate, the
dimension of Sz(Cf G) is |Ĝ|. Therefore, by (35), Sz(Cf G) is commutative if and
only if ker(ϕ) = Ĝ. The equivalence between the first and the fourth conditions
is clear from Corollary 2.9. Finally, since any central element is (λ, f )-regular for
some λ ∈ Ĝ (see Lemma 2.8), the last claim is clear from the first condition.
By Lemma 2.8, nondegenerate cocycles f ∈ Z 2 (G, C∗ ) over abelian groups G
are natural examples for affirmative answer to Problem 1(ii). However, there exist
more sophisticated examples.
Corollary 4.4. Let f ∈ H 2 (G, C∗ ) be a nondegenerate cocycle, assume also Z(G) 6⊆
Gp . If Ĝ ∼
= Cp × Cp then Sz(Cf G) ∼
= Mp (C).
Proof. By (4),
ˆ
Sz(Cf G) = Cf (Cp × Cp ).
ˆ
Now, by Corollary 4.3, since Z(G) 6⊆ Gp , Cf (Cp × Cp ) is non-commutative and
hence by Corollary 4.3 [fˆ] is non-trivial. Since any cohomology class of Cp × Cp
is either trivial or nondegenerate (see [11, §2]) we get that fˆ is nondegenerate.
ˆ
Consequently, Cf (Cp × Cp ) is simple.
In Theorem 5, the idea of the construction of the cohomology class [f ] is based
on the following lemma.
SIMPLE TWISTED GROUP ALGEBRAS OF DIMENSION p4
19
Lemma 4.5. Let f be nondegenerate cocycle and denote by f p the restriction of f
to Gp . Then
p
p
Sz(Cf G) ∩ Cf Gp ⊆ Z(Cf Gp ).
Proof. By Proposition 2.7, it is enough to show that if x ∈ Gp is a (λ, f )-regular
element for some λ ∈ Ĝ, then it is also f p -regular. Assume that x ∈ Gp is a (λ, f )regular element. Let g ∈ CGp (x), in particular g ∈ Gp . Therefore, δ(g) = 1 for any
δ ∈ Ĝ. Since x is (λ, f )-regular,
[ux , ug ] = λ(x) = 1.
Consequently x is f p -regular.
Note that for any normal subgroup N of a group G, a G-conjugacy class splits
into [G : N CG (g)], N -conjugacy classes. Let x ∈ Gp be a (λ, f )-regular element.
Then, the G-conjugacy class [x] splits into [G : Gp CG (x)] many Gp -conjugacy classes.
Consequently, with the notations of Corollary 2.9,
(36)
[
X
{[x]Gp |x is (λ, f )-regular} =
[G : G′ CG (x)].
x∈Γ(f )∩Gp
λ∈Ĝ
From (36) and Corollary 4.3 we get
Corollary 4.6. Let f ∈ Z 2 (G, C∗ ) be a nondegenerate cocycle. If the number of
Gp conjugacy classes (in Gp ) is smaller than the cardinality of Ĝ, then Sz(Cf G) is
not commutative. In particular, if Sz(Cf G) is commutative, then |Gp | ≥ |G/Gp |.
In the next section we will deal with the semi-center of simple twisted group
algebras Cf G where G is a p-group for a prime number p. We will use the following
proposition.
Proposition 4.7. Let f ∈ Z 2 (G, C) be a nondegenerate
cocycle and assume
p
that Sz(CfpG) is commutative. Then, |Z(G)| ≤ |G|. In the specific case where
|Z(G)| = |G|, then Gp = Z(G) ∼
= Ĝ.
Proof. By Corollary 4.3, since Sz(Cf G) is commutative then Z(G) ⊆ Gp . In particular,
(37)
|Z(G)| ≤ |Gp |.
On the other hand, by [12, Theorem C], Z(G) embeds into Ĝ and therefore
(38)
|Z(G)| ≤ |Ĝ| =
|G|
.
|Gp |
p
p
From (37) and (38) we get |Z(G)| ≤ |G|. In the case where |Z(G)| = |G| we
get equalities in both (37) and (38). Since Z(G) and Gp are of the same order and
Z(G) ⊆ Gp we have Gp = Z(G). Since Z(G) embeds into Ĝ and they have the same
order we have Z(G) ∼
= Ĝ.
20
OFIR SCHNABEL
5. Semi-center of simple twisted group algebras over p-groups.
We start this section by proving that the semi-center of the simple twisted group
algebras presented in Theorem 3.6, which correspond to the groups G(xv) , is commutative. Then we will show that G(xv) is unique with this properties. In other
words, we will show that if G is a group of order p4 , where p now is any prime,
and if there exists a nondegenerate cocycle f ∈ Z 2 (G, C∗ ) such that Sz(Cf G) is
commutative, then G ∼
= G(xv) . In particular, there is no group G of order 16 which
admits a nondegenerate cocycle f ∈ Z 2 (G, C∗ ) such that Sz(Cf G) is commutative.
Theorem 5.1. Let G := G(xv) for primes p ≥ 5 and let H := G(xv) for p = 3.
The twisted group algebras which correspond to the following cohomology classes
[f ] ∈ H 2 (G, C∗ ) and [β] ∈ H 2 (H, C∗ ) admits a commutative semi-center.
[f ] : upa = upb = upc = upd = 1[ua , ub ] = [ua , uc ] = 1, [ud, ua ] = ζp , [uc , ub ] = ζp , [ud , ub ] = ua , [ud , uc ] = ub .
[β] : u9a = u3b = u3c = 1, [ua , ub ] = ζ3 , [uc , ua ] = ζ9 ub , [uc , ub ] = u6a .
Proof. In the proof of Theorem 3.6 it was shown that [f ] and [β] are indeed cohomology classes. We start by showing that Sz(Cf G) is commutative. Since Gp = ha, bi
we can identify
Ĝ ∼
= Cp × Cp = hλc i × hλd i.
Here,
λc (a) = λc (b) = λc (d) = 1, λc (c) = ζp ,
and
λd (a) = λd (b) = λd (c) = 1, λd (d) = ζp ,
where ζp is a primitive p-th root of unity. Since a is central and
[ua , uc ] = [ua , ub ] = 1, [ud, ua ] = ζp ,
we get that a is (λd , f )-regular.
Similarly, since CG (b) = ha, b, ci and
[ua , ub ] = 1, [uc , ub ] = ζp ,
we get that b is (λc , f )-regular. Consequently, with the notations of (34),
ϕ(λc ) = bGp = Gp and ϕ(λd ) = aGp = Gp .
Therefore, ϕ is trivial and hence by Corollary 4.3, Sz(Cf G) is commutative.
Next, we show that Sz(Cβ H) is commutative. Since H p = ha3 , bi we can identify
Ĥ ∼
= Cp × Cp = hλa i × hλc i.
Here,
λa (b) = λa (c) = 1, λa (a) = ζ3 ,
and
λc (a) = λc (b) = 1, λc (c) = ζ3 ,
where ζ3 is a root of unity of order 3. Since a3 is central and
[ua3 , ub ] = 1, [ua3 , uc ] = ζ3 ,
we get that a3 is (λc , β)-regular.
Similarly, since CG (b) = ha, bi and
[ua , ub ] = ζ3 ,
SIMPLE TWISTED GROUP ALGEBRAS OF DIMENSION p4
21
we get that b is (λa , β)-regular. Consequently, with the notations of (34),
ϕ(λa ) = bGp = Gp and ϕ(λc ) = a3 Gp = Gp .
Therefore, ϕ is trivial and hence by Corollary 4.3, Sz(Cf G) is commutative.
Notice that Z(G(xv) ) is a proper subgroup of Gp(xv) of cardinality p. It turns out
that this is a necessary condition on a group G of order p4 in order to admit a
nondegenerate cocycle f ∈ Z 2 (G, C) such that Sz(Cf G) is commutative.
Lemma 5.2. Let G be a group of order p4 where p is prime. Assume that there
is a nondegenerate cocycle f ∈ Z 2 (G, C) such that Sz(Cf G) is commutative. Then
Z(G) is a proper subgroup of Gp of cardinality p.
Proof. The group G admits a normal subgroup of order pi for any 0 ≤ i ≤ 4 (see
[19, Exercise 4.2]). In particular, G admits a normal subgroup N of order p2 . Since
|G/N | = p2 we conclude that G/N is a abelian. Therefore |Gp | ≤ p2 . If |Gp | < p2 ,
then by Corollary 4.6, Sz(Cf G) is non-commutative which is a contradiction. We
are left with the case in which |Gp | = p2 . By Corollary 4.3, Z(G) ⊆ Gp . There
are two possibilities. Either, Z(G) is a proper subgroup of Gp of cardinality p or
Z(G) = Gp . We will show that the second possibility never happens. Assume
Z(G) = Gp . Then, by Proposition 4.7, Gp = Z(G) ∼
= Ĝ. Obviously, this cannot
happen if Z(G) cyclic. Indeed, in this case G/Z(G) is cyclic and hence the group G
is abelian which contradicts our assumption that the semi-center is commutative.
Assume Z(G) ∼
= Cp × Cp . We get a central extension
(39)
φ
1 → Gp ∼
→ Cp × Cp → 1.
= Cp × Cp → G −
Let x, y ∈ G such that φ(x), φ(y) generates Im(φ). Then the commutator Gp is the
cyclic subgroup of order p generated by [x, y]. This contradicts (39).
We are now ready to prove the uniqueness of G(xv) in the following sense.
Proposition 5.3. Let G be group of cardinality p4 where p is prime. If there exists
a nondegenerate cocycle f ∈ Z 2 (G, C) such that Sz(Cf G) is commutative then p > 2
and G ∼
= G(xv) .
Proof. Clearly, G cannot be abelian. Let G be a group of central type which is
not isomorphic to G(xv) from Table 1. Then by Theorem 1, if p is odd then G
isomorphic to either G(viii) or G(xiv) from Table 1, and if p = 2 then by Theorem 2,
G is isomorphic to either G(ix) or G(x) from Table 2. However, in all these groups
the center is not a proper subgroup of the commutator and hence by Lemma 5.2
there is no commutative semi-center of simple twisted group algebras over these
groups.
Let Cf G be a simple twisted group algebra. By Remark 4.1 and by Proposition 5.3, if either |G| is cube-free or |G| = 16, then Sz(Cf G) is non-commutative.
Hence, if a group G admits a nondegenerate cocycle f ∈ Z 2 (G, C∗ ) such that
Sz(Cf G) is commutative, then |G| ≥ 64.
Next we prove Theorem 5. Recall that G defined as follows:
(40)
G = hx1 , x2 , x3 , x4 , x5 , x6 i,
such that x1 , x2 , x3 are central and
x2i = 1,
[x4 , x5 ] = x1 ,
[x4 , x6 ] = x2 ,
[x5 , x6 ] = x3 .
22
OFIR SCHNABEL
We show that there exists a nondegenerate cocycle f ∈ Z 2 (G, C∗ ) such that
Sz(Cf G) is commutative.
Proof of Theorem 5.
The idea of the construction of G is based on Proposition 4.7. Clearly,
Z(G) = hx1 , x2 , x3 i = Gp .
Therefore,
Ĝ ∼
= Gp = Z(G).
The idea of the construction of [f ] ∈ H 2 (G, C∗ ) is based on Lemma 4.5. We
wish to construct a nondegenerate cohomology class [f ] ∈ H 2 (G, C∗ ) such that the
restriction of [f ] to Gp is trivial. Let ui := uxi . As before, we assume that u2i = 1.
We use a construction of crossed product in the following way. Start from the
commutative group algebra R1 = CZ(G) and construct a C2 = hx4 i action on R1
in the following way.
ψ4 :R1 → R1
u1 →
7 t14 u1
u2 →
7 t24 u2
u3 7→ t34 u3
For any tij = ±1, ψ4 is an automorphism (of order 2) of the ring R1 . Hence, the
ring R2 generated by u1 , u2 , u3 , u4 is a crossed product of C2 over R1 . In particular
it is an associative algebra. Consider the following C2 = hx5 i-action on R2 .
ψ5 :R2 → R2
u1 7→ u1
u2 →
7 t25 u2
u3 →
7 t35 u3
u4 7→ δu1 u4
We show that again, for any tij , δ = ±1, ψ5 is an automorphism (of order 2) of the
ring R2 . Clearly, the restriction of ψ5 to R1 is an automorphism. We need to check
if the following equality holds for any 1 ≤ i ≤ 3.
(41)
−1
ψ5 (u4 ui u−1
.
4 ) = ψ5 (u4 )ψ5 (ui )ψ5 (u4 )
Indeed,
ψ5 (u4 ui u−1
4 ) = ψ5 (ti4 ui ) = ti4 ti5 ui ,
and on the other hand,
−1
ψ5 (u4 )ψ5 (ui )ψ5 (u4 )−1 = (δu1 u4 )(ti5 ui )(δ −1 u−1
4 u1 )
= ti5 u1 (u4 ui u4−1 )u−1
1 = ti4 ti5 ui .
Since ψ5 is an automorphism of the ring R2 we conclude that the ring R3 generated by u1 , u2 , u3 , u4 , u5 is a crossed product of C2 over R2 . In particular it is an
associative algebra. Finally, we construct a C2 = hx6 i-action on R3 in the following
SIMPLE TWISTED GROUP ALGEBRAS OF DIMENSION p4
23
way.
ψ6 :R3 → R3
u1 →
7 t16 u1
u2 →
7 u2
u3 →
7 u3
u4 →
7 γu2 u4
u5 7→ λu3 u5
Now, we search conditions on tij , δ, γ, λ = ±1, such that ψ6 will be an automorphism
of the ring R3 . Similarly to the proof that ψ5 is an automorphism of R2 , the
restriction of ψ6 to R2 is also an automorphism. We need to check if the following
equality holds for any 1 ≤ i ≤ 4.
−1
ψ6 (u5 ui u−1
.
5 ) = ψ6 (u5 )ψ6 (ui )ψ6 (u5 )
(42)
For 1 ≤ i ≤ 3 we have on one side
ψ6 (u5 ui u−1
5 ) = ψ6 (ti5 ui ) = ti5 ti6 ui .
And on the other hand
−1 −1
ψ6 (u5 )ψ6 (ui )ψ6 (u5 )−1 = λu3 u5 ti6 ui u−1
= ti6 u3 ti5 ui u3−1 = ti5 ti6 ui .
5 u3 λ
For i = 4 we get on one side
ψ6 (u5 u4 u−1
5 ) = ψ6 (δu1 u4 ) = δt16 u1 γu2 u4 .
On the other hand
(43)
−1 −1
ψ6 (u5 )ψ6 (u4 )ψ6 (u5 )−1 = (λu3 u5 )(γu2 u4 )(u−1
)=
5 u3 λ
−1 −1
−1
γu3 u5 u2 (u−1
5 u5 )u4 u5 u3 = γu3 t25 u2 δu1 u4 u3 =
(44)
γδt25 u1 u2 u3 u4 u−1
3 = γδt25 u1 t34 u1 u2 u4 .
Therefore, equality holds if and only if
(45)
t16 = t25 t34 .
For t16 , t25 , t34 ∈ {1, −1} which satisfy (45), ψ6 is an automorphism and then the
ring R generated by u1 , u2 , u3 , u4 , u5 , u6 is a crossed product of C2 over R3 . In
particular it is an associative algebra.
Let t16 = t34 = t24 = t35 = −1 and all the other tij = 1 and λ = γ = δ = 1.
Then, the ring R is a complex associative algebra generated by u1 , u2 , u3 , u4 , u5 , u6
with the following relations.
(46)
[u1 , u6 ] = [u2 , u4 ] = [u3 , u4 ] = [u3 , u5 ] = −1.
For all the other 1 ≤ i ≤ 3, 4 ≤ j ≤ 6 we have [ui , uj ] = 1. Also for all 1 ≤ k ≤ 6,
[ui , uip ] = 1 for all 1 ≤ i, ip ≤ 3, [u4 , u5 ] = u1 , [u4 , u6 ] = u2 and [u5 , u6 ] = u3 . The
associativity of R ensures that there exists a cocycle f ∈ Z 2 (G, C∗ ) which satisfies
the above relations. We need to show the cocycle f is nondegenerate. It easy
to show that there are no f -regular elements in G and hence f is nondegenerate.
Indeed, for g 6∈ Z(G) there exists an element h ∈ Z(G) such that [ug , uh ] 6= 1.
On the other hand, for any h ∈ Z(G) there exists an element g 6∈ Z(G) such that
[ug , uh ] 6= 1. Since any element in Z(G) is (λ, f )-regular and since |Z(G)| = |Ĝ|
we can conclude that all the (λ, f )-regular elements in G are central and hence
contained in Gp = Z(G). By Corollary 4.3, Sz(Cf G) is commutative.
24
OFIR SCHNABEL
By Proposition 5.3 and Remark 4.1 the group G presented in Theorem 5 is
minimal with the property that (Cf G) is simple and Sz(Cf G) is commutative.
6. Problem 1 for general cocycles
As already mentioned, if Sz(Cf G) is simple then Cf G is also simple. As for the
commutative semi-center, there are many obvious examples. Clearly, if G is an
abelian group then Sz(CG) = CG is commutative. Since the cohomology of cyclic
groups is trivial, then another family of examples is any cocycle f ∈ Z 2 (G, C∗ ) on
a group G such that Ĝ is cyclic.
Next, we present an example of a group G of order 8 such that Ĝ is not cyclic,
a cocycle f ∈ Z 2 (G, C∗ ) such that Cf G is non-commutative and still Sz(Cf G) is
commutative.
Example 6.1. Let
G = D4 = {σ, τ |σ 4 = 1, τ 2 = 1, τ στ = σ −1 }.
Recall that the conjugation classes of D4 are
{1},
{σ 2 },
{σ, σ 3 },
{στ, σ 3 τ },
{τ, σ 2 τ },
and
Gp = {1, σ 2 }.
Let Cf G be the twisted group algebra spanned by the elements {ug }g∈G where
(47)
uτ uσ u−1
τ = iuσ3 .
By (47), [uσ2 , uτ ] = −1. Therefore, σ 2 is not f -regular and in the notations of [12,
Corollary 2.3],
Γ(1, f ) ∩ Gp = {1}.
Hence, by [12, Corollary 2.3]
dimC (Sz(Cf G)) = 4.
Consequently, Sz(Cf G) it either commutative or simple. Since the semi-center of
non-simple twisted group algebra is never simple we conclude that the Sz(Cf G) is
commutative.
Table 1. Groups of order p4 where p is an odd prime
3
2
ap = bp = 1, aba−1 = bap
2
ap = bp = cp = 1, [a, b] = [a, c] = 1, [b, c] = ap
2
2
ap = bp = 1, [a, b] = ap
2
ap = bp = cp = 1, [a, b] = [b, c] = 1, [a, c] = ap
2
ap = bp = cp = 1, [a, b] = [b, c] = 1, [a, c] = b
2
ap = bp = cp = 1, [b, c] = 1, [a, b] = ap , ac = cab
2
ap = bp = cp = 1, [b, c] = ap , [a, b] = ap , ac = cab
2
ap = bp = cp = 1, [b, c] = aαp , [a, b] = ap , ac = cab, α = any non-residue (mod p)
a9 = b3 = c3 = 1, [b, c] = 1, [a, b] = a3 , [a, c] = ba3
a9 = b3 = 1, c3 = a3 , [b, c] = 1, [a, b] = ap , [c, a] = ba3
a9 = b3 = 1, c3 = a6 , [b, c] = 1, [a, b] = ap , [c, a] = ba3
ap = bp = cp = dp = 1, [a, b] = [a, c] = [a, d] = [b, c] = [b, d] = 1, [c, d] = a
ap = bp = cp = dp = 1, [a, b] = [a, c] = [a, d] = [b, c] = 1, [d, b] = a, [d, c] = b
a9 = b3 = c3 = 1, [a, b] = 1, [a, c] = ba3 , [b, c] = a3
SIMPLE TWISTED GROUP ALGEBRAS OF DIMENSION p4
G(i)
Cp4
G(ii)
Cp3 × Cp
G(iii)
Cp2 × Cp2
G(iv)
Cp2 × Cp × Cp
G(v)
Cp4
G(vi)
ha, bi
G(vii)
ha, b, ci
G(viii)
ha, bi
G(ix)
ha, b, ci
G(x)
ha, b, ci
G(xi) for p > 3
ha, b, ci
G(xii) for p > 3
ha, b, ci
G(xiii) for p > 3
ha, b, ci
G(xi) for p = 3
ha, b, ci
G(xii) for p = 3
ha, b, ci
G(xiii) for p = 3
ha, b, ci
G(xiv)
ha, b, c, di
G(xv) for p > 3
ha, b, c, di
G(xv) for p = 3
ha, b, ci
25
a8
a4
a4
a4
a4
a4
a8
a8
a8
= b2 = 1, aba−1 = ba4
= b2 = c2 = 1, [a, b] = [a, c] = 1, [b, c] = a2
= b4 = 1, [a, b] = a2
= b2 = c2 = 1, [a, b] = [b, c] = 1, [a, c] = a2
= b2 = c2 = 1, [a, b] = [b, c] = 1, [a, c] = b
= c2 = 1, a2 = b2 [a, c] = [b, c] = 1, [a, b] = a2
= b2 = 1, [a, b] = a2
= b2 = 1, [a, b] = a6
= 1, b2 = a4 [a, b] = a6
OFIR SCHNABEL
G(i)
C16
G(ii)
C8 × C2
G(iii)
C4 × C4
G(iv) C4 × C2 × C2
G(v)
C24
G(vi)
ha, bi
G(vii)
ha, b, ci
G(viii)
ha, bi
G(ix)
ha, b, ci
G(x)
ha, b, ci
G(xi)
ha, b, ci
G(xii)
ha, bi
G(xiii)
ha, bi
G(xiv)
ha, bi
26
Table 2. Groups of order 16
SIMPLE TWISTED GROUP ALGEBRAS OF DIMENSION p4
27
References
[1] E. Aljadeff and Y. Ginosar. On the global dimension of multiplicative Weyl algebras. Arch.
Math. (Basel), 62(5):401–407, 1994.
[2] Y. A. Bahturin, S. K. Sehgal, and M. V. Zaicev. Group gradings on associative algebras. J.
Algebra, 241(2):677–698, 2001.
[3] Y. A. Bahturin and M. V. Zaicev. Group gradings on matrix algebras. Canad. Math. Bull.,
45(4):499–508, 2002.
[4] N. Ben David, Y. Ginosar, and E. Meir. Isotropy in group cohomology. Bull. Lond. Math.
Soc., 46(3):587–599, 2014.
[5] A. Braun and G. Vernik. On the center and semi-center of enveloping algebras in prime
characteristic. J. Algebra, 322(5):1830–1858, 2009.
[6] W. Burnside. Theory of groups of finite order. Dover Publications, Inc., New York, 1955. 2nd
ed.
[7] S. Danz and K. Erdmann. Crossed Products as Twisted Category Algebras. Algebr. Represent. Theory, 18(2):281–296, 2015.
[8] F. R. DeMeyer and G. J. Janusz. Finite groups with an irreducible representation of large
degree. Math. Z., 108:145–153, 1969.
[9] J. Dixmier. Enveloping algebras, grad. stud. math. Amer. Math. Soc, II, 1996.
[10] A. Elduque and M. Kochetov. Gradings on simple Lie algebras, volume 189 of Mathematical
Surveys and Monographs. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI; Atlantic Association for Research in the Mathematical Sciences (AARMS), Halifax, NS, 2013.
[11] Y. Ginosar and O. Schnabel. Maximal connected gradings and intrinsic fundamental groups
of complex semisimple algebras. In preparation.
[12] Y. Ginosar and O. Schnabel. Semi-invariant Matrices over Finite Groups. Algebr. Represent.
Theory, 17(1):199–212, 2014.
[13] R. B. Howlett and I. M. Isaacs. On groups of central type. Math. Z., 179(4):555–569, 1982.
[14] G. Karpilovsky. Projective representations of finite groups, volume 94 of Monographs and
Textbooks in Pure and Applied Mathematics. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1985.
[15] M. Linckelmann and M. Stolorz. On simple modules over twisted finite category algebras.
Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 140(11):3725–3737, 2012.
[16] E. Nauwelaerts and F. Van Oystaeyen. The Brauer splitting theorem and projective representations of finite groups over rings. J. Algebra, 112(1):49–57, 1988.
[17] D. S. Passman. Character theory and group rings. In Character theory of finite groups, volume
524 of Contemp. Math., pages 139–148. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2010.
[18] D. S. Passman and P. Wauters. Semi-invariants and weights of group algebras of finite groups.
Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 127(5):1323–1329, 1999.
[19] J. Rotman. An introduction to the Theory of Groups Fourth Edition. Springer-Verlag, 1995.
[20] M. K. Smith. Semi-invariant rings. Comm. Algebra, 13(6):1283–1298, 1985.
[21] P. Wauters. The semicentre of a group algebra. Proc. Edinburgh Math. Soc. (2), 42(1):95–111,
1999.
[22] P. Wauters. The semicentre of a group algebra. II. Comm. Algebra, 29(11):5179–5190, 2001.
Institute of Algebra and Number Theory, Pfaffenwaldring 57, University of Stuttgart,
Stuttgart 70569, Germany
E-mail address: [email protected]
| 4math.GR
|
MULTIPLIER IDEALS IN TWO-DIMENSIONAL LOCAL RINGS WITH
RATIONAL SINGULARITIES
arXiv:1412.3605v2 [math.AG] 4 May 2016
MARIA ALBERICH-CARRAMIÑANA, JOSEP ÀLVAREZ MONTANER,
AND FERRAN DACHS-CADEFAU
Abstract. The aim of this paper is to study jumping numbers and multiplier ideals
of any ideal in a two-dimensional local ring with a rational singularity. In particular
we reveal which information encoded in a multiplier ideal determines the next jumping
number. This leads to an algorithm to compute sequentially the jumping numbers and
the whole chain of multiplier ideals in any desired range. As a consequence of our method
we develop the notion of jumping divisor that allows to describe the jump between two
consecutive multiplier ideals. In particular we find a unique minimal jumping divisor
that is studied extensively.
1. Introduction
Let X be a complex algebraic variety with mild singularities and OX,O the local ring
of a point O ∈ X. To any ideal a ⊆ OX,O one may associate a family of multiplier ideals
J (aλ ) parametrized by positive rational numbers λ ∈ Q>0 . Indeed, they form a nested
sequence of ideals
OX,O ! J (aλ1 ) ! J (aλ2 ) ! ... ! J (aλi ) ! ...
and the rational numbers 0 < λ1 < λ2 < · · · where the multiplier ideals change are
called jumping numbers. The first jumping number λ1 is also known as the log-canonical
threshold. Multiplier ideals and their associated jumping numbers have proven to be a
powerful tool to understand the geometry of singularities. They are defined using a logresolution of the pair (X, a). In fact, smaller or more dense jumping numbers can be
thought to correspond to “worse“ singularities.
The aim of this paper is to present a new approach to the understanding of multiplier
ideals and jumping numbers of any ideal a in the local ring OX,O of a complex surface X
having at worst a rational singularity at O. This is a case, especially when X is smooth,
that has received a lot of attention in recent years because of the interesting properties
these invariants satisfy (see the works of Favre-Jonsson [8], [9], Lipman-Watanabe[20] or
Tucker [24]). This is also one of the few cases where explicit computations have been
done.
All three authors were partially supported by Generalitat de Catalunya 2014 SGR-634 project and Spanish
Ministerio de Economı́a y Competitividad MTM2012-38122-C03-01/FEDER. FDC is also supported by
the KU Leuven grant OT/11/069. MAC is also with the Institut de Robòtica i Informàtica Industrial
(CSIC-UPC) and the Barcelona Graduate School of Mathematics (BGSMath).
1
2
M. ALBERICH-CARRAMIÑANA, J. ÀLVAREZ MONTANER, AND F. DACHS-CADEFAU
For simple complete ideals or irreducible plane curves in a smooth surface, Järviletho
[15] and Naie [21] provide a closed formula for the set of jumping numbers in terms of
some invariants of the singularity, the Zariski exponents. To give a closed formula for any
general ideal is beyond the scope of this work. A formula for the log-canonical threshold
already becomes quite complicated as one may see in the papers of Kuwata [16] and
Galindo-Hernando-Monserrat [11].
For the case of any ideal in a surface with a rational singularity we must refer to the work
of Tucker [25] where he gives a simple algorithm to compute the set of jumping numbers.
To such purpose, he developed the notion of divisors that (critically) contribute, building
upon previous work of Smith-Thompson [23]. We may interpret jumping numbers as being
parametrized by contributing divisors and critical divisors are more economic to detect
since the complete ideals they define are very close to their corresponding multiplier ideal.
The algorithm he proposes uses a characterization of critical divisors that allows them to
be found and consequently allows the corresponding jumping numbers to be computed.
A similar strategy is used by Hyry-Järvilehto in [14] where they proved that jumping
numbers are parameterized by more general complete ideals1. Moreover, they provide a
combinatorial criterion to detect a suitable ideal and its corresponding jumping number.
The aim of this paper is to understand the whole change between a multiplier ideal to
the next one, and to reveal what information encoded in a multiplier ideal determines the
next jumping number. This is done in our main result Theorem 3.5 and it gives rise to
an algorithm to compute the ordered sequence of multiplier ideals in any desired range
of the real line. The algorithm avoids considering candidates and computes sequentially
at each step a jumping number and its associated multiplier ideal. This new algorithm
improves in efficiency the computation of jumping numbers when compared with Tucker’s
algorithm.
Perhaps the most important contribution of our method lies in finding a divisor, that
we name the minimal jumping divisor, tightly related to the aforementioned algorithm,
which enables one to obtain a multiplier ideal from the previous one, and vice versa. This
jumping divisor is studied, in particular its geometric structure on the dual graph, and it
is compared with the previously known critically contributing divisors.
The structure of this paper is as follows: In Section §2 we introduce the basics of the
theory of multiplier ideals and some of the tools in the theory of singularities that we
will need in the rest of the paper. We pay special attention to the equivalence between
complete ideals and antinef divisors developed by Lipman in [19] since this is the way
we will present multiplier ideals. In particular we provide a new method to compute the
antinef closure of any given divisor, generalizing previous versions of Casas-Alvero [5] and
Reguera [22].
1Contributing
divisors describe complete ideals nested in between consecutive multiplier ideals. The
ideals considered in [14] are not necessarily nested.
MULTIPLIER IDEALS IN TWO-DIMENSIONAL LOCAL RINGS
3
In Section §3 we present the main result of this paper in Theorem 3.5. It gives a
generalization of a well-known formula for the log-canonical threshold and allows us to
compute a jumping number from the data given by the preceding a multiplier ideal. This
leads to the desired algorithm that computes sequentially the chain of multiplier ideals.
In Section §4 we develop the theory of jumping divisors that allows us to describe the
whole jump between two consecutive multiplier ideals. Quite surprisingly, the algorithm
we develop in Section §3 allows us to construct the unique minimal jumping divisor
associated to every jumping number. It is minimal in the sense that no proper subdivisor
gives the jump between consecutive multiplier ideals. Moreover, we prove in Theorem 4.11
that minimal jumping divisors are generically invariant with respect to log-resolutions of
the ideal and they satisfy some nice geometric properties when viewed in the dual graph.
Finally, in Section §5 we present the theory of jumping divisors in a more general
framework that we develop using the results of Hyry-Järvilehto [14] and their relation
with the theory of contributing divisors of Tucker [25]. The main result of this section is
the fact that, among all the contributing divisors associated to a jumping number that
give the same ideal, there is a minimal one. For example, critical divisors are of this type.
It turns out that these minimal contributing divisors are all contained in the minimal
jumping divisor and inherit the same invariance property with respect to log-resolutions
of the ideal.
Acknowledgments: We wish to thank Vı́ctor González Alonso for uncountable discussions that we had with him during the realization of this work. The authors would
also like to thank Pierrette Cassou-Nogués and Wim Veys for the comments received and
Manuel González-Villa for a careful reading of a previous version of the manuscript.
2. Preliminaries
Let X be a normal surface and O a point where X has at worst a rational singularity.
That is, there exists a desingularization π : X ′ → X such that the stalk at O of the higher
direct image R1 π∗ OX ′ is zero. This property is then satisfied for any desingularization.
The theory of rational singularities was introduced by Artin in [4] and further developed
by Lipman in [19]. Another reference that we will follow closely is [22].
Let a ⊆ OX be an ideal sheaf. Denote m = mX,O ⊆ OX,O the maximal ideal of the local
ring OX,O at O. Throughout this work we will often consider the case where a ⊆ m is an
m-primary ideal, which can be identified with an ideal sheaf that equals OX outside the
point O (we will use both languages interchangeably, depending on the context). Recall
that a log-resolution of the pair (X, a) (or of a, for short) is a proper birational morphism
π : X ′ → X such that
i) X ′ is smooth,
ii) the preimage of a is locally principal, that is, a · OX ′ = OX ′ (−F ) for some effective
Cartier divisor F , and
4
M. ALBERICH-CARRAMIÑANA, J. ÀLVAREZ MONTANER, AND F. DACHS-CADEFAU
iii) F + E is a divisor with simple normal crossings support where E = Exc (π) is the
exceptional locus.
From now on, consider a given log-resolution of a. Since the point O has (at worst) a
rational singularity, the exceptional locus E is a tree of smooth rational curves E1 , . . . , Er .
Furthermore, the matrix of intersections (Ei · Ej )16i,j6r is negative-definite.
P
Let Div(X ′ ) be the group of integral divisors in X ′ , i.e. divisors of the form D = i di Ei
where the Ei are pairwise different (non necessarily exceptional) prime divisors and di ∈ Z.
Among them, we will consider divisors in the lattice Λ := ZE1 ⊕ · · · ⊕ ZEr of exceptional
divisors and we will simply refer them as divisors with exceptional support. Any divisor
D ∈ Div(X ′ ) has a decomposition D = Dexc + Daff into its exceptional and affine part2
according to its support. Our main example is the divisor F such that a·OX ′ = OX ′ (−F ).
In this case we will denote its exceptional and affine part as
Fexc =
r
X
ei Ei
and
i=1
Faff =
s
X
ei Ei
i=r+1
where, by definition, the ei are non-negative integers. Whenever a is an m-primary ideal,
the divisor F is just supported on the exceptional locus. i.e. F = Fexc .
Remark 2.1. Let C : f = 0 be a curve defined by an element f ∈ OX,O . The total
transform of C is the pull-back C := π ∗ C and its strict transform C ′ is the closure
P of
π −1 (C − {O}). The total transform has a presentation C = C ′ + C exc = C ′ + di Ei
where the weights vi (f ) := di are the values of the curve C at Ei . Recall that f ∈ a
whenever C ′ + C exc > F and f is generic in a if C exc = Fexc and C ′ − Faff has no singular
points.
More generally, we will also consider Q-divisors in DivQ (X ′ ) = Div(X ′ ) ⊗Z Q or divisors
in the Q-vector space ΛQ := QE1 ⊕ · · · ⊕ QEr . The main example will be the relative
canonical divisor Kπ . Indeed, the definition of Kπ is quite subtle if O is singular, because at
first sight one can only define a canonical divisor KX of X as a Weil divisor. Since rational
singularities are in particular Q-factorial, there exists a positive integer m such that mKX
is Cartier, which can be pulled back to X ′ and allows to define Kπ = KX ′ − m1 π ∗ (mKX ).
Alternatively,
r
X
Kπ =
ki Ei
i=1
is supported on the exceptional locus E, and must satisfy
!
r
X
(2.1)
(Kπ + Ei ) · Ei =
kj Ej · Ei + Ei2 = −2
j=1
2We
follow the terminology of Lipman-Watanabe [20]
MULTIPLIER IDEALS IN TWO-DIMENSIONAL LOCAL RINGS
5
for every exceptional component Ei because of the adjunction formula. This property indeed characterizes Kπ because the intersection form on E is negative-definite, and therefore the system defined by equations (2.1) has a unique solution (k1 , . . . , kr ). However, the
ki are not necessarily integral, and can even be negative. In the case that ki > −1 (resp.
ki > −1) for all Ei , one says that X has a log-terminal singularity (resp. log-canonical
singularity) at O.
P
For any Q-divisor D = i di Ei ∈ DivQ (X ′ ), we denote its round-down and round-up
as
X
X
⌊D⌋ =
⌊di ⌋ Ei and ⌈D⌉ =
⌈di ⌉ Ei .
i
i
P
The fractional part of D is then {D} = D − ⌊D⌋ = i {di } Ei . In the sequel we will
denote the value of each component Ei of D as vEi (D) := di . If no confusion arises, we
will simply denote the value of the components as vi (D) := vEi (D).
2.1. Dual graph. The combinatorics of the log-resolution of a can be encoded using the
so-called dual graph. This is a rooted tree where the vertices represent the irreducible
components Ei 6 F and two vertices are joined by an edge if the corresponding divisors
intersect.
Given any component Ei , we will denote by Adj (Ei ) the set of components Ej , j 6= i,
sharing an edge with Ei , i.e. Ei · Ej = 1, and by
a (Ei ) = #Adj (Ei ) = Ei · F red − Ei
the number of such components which is the valence of the vertex representing Ei , where
F red denotes de reduced divisor with the same support as F . An end of the dual graph is
nothing but a vertex with valence 1, i.e. a vertex Ei such that a (Ei ) = 1. More generally,
for any effective subdivisor D = Ei1 + · · · + Eim 6 F we define
AdjD (Ei ) = {Ej 6 D | Ei · Ej = 1}
and aD (Ei ) = #AdjD (Ei ). We denote by vD = m (resp. aD ) the number of components
of D (resp. the number of intersections between two components of D). Since the dual
graph is a tree it is clear that
X
aD (Ei ) = 2aD
Ei 6D
and that vD − aD equals the number of connected components of D. An end of the
subgraph associated to D is a vertex with valence 1 or 0. The later meaning that Ei is
an isolated component of D.
For any exceptional component Ei , we define the excess (of a) at Ei as ρi = −F · Ei .
It can be interpreted as the number of branches of the strict transform of a curve defined
by a generic element f ∈ a that intersect the component Ei . Indeed, if its total transform
is C = C ′ + F then 0 = C · Ei = C ′ · Ei + F · Ei = C ′ · Ei − ρi , which proves the claim.
There are two kinds of exceptional divisors that will play a special role:
6
M. ALBERICH-CARRAMIÑANA, J. ÀLVAREZ MONTANER, AND F. DACHS-CADEFAU
• A component Ei of E is a rupture component if a (Ei ) > 3, that is, it intersects at
least three more components of E (different from Ei ).
• We say that Ei is dicritical if ρi > 0. By [19], dicritical components correspond to
Rees valuations.
We also mention that non-exceptional components also correspond to Rees valuations.
P
2.2. Complete ideals and antinef divisors. Given an effective Q-divisor D =
di Ei ∈
DivQ (X ′ ) we may consider its associated (sheaf) ideal π∗ OX ′ (−D) := π∗ OX ′ (−⌈D⌉). Its
stalk at O is
ID := {f ∈ OX,O | vi (f ) > ⌈di ⌉ for all Ei 6 D}.
This is a complete ideal of OX,O that is m-primary whenever D has exceptional support,
i.e. D ∈ ΛQ . Any two divisors D, D ′ ∈ DivQ (X ′ ) defining the same complete ideal
π∗ OX ′ (−D) = π∗ OX ′ (−D ′ ) are called equivalent divisors.
In the equivalence class of a given divisor one may find a unique maximal representative.
First, recall that an effective divisor with integral coefficients D ∈ Div(X ′ ) is called antinef
if −D · Ei > 0, for every exceptional prime divisor Ei . It is worth to point out that the
affine part of D = Dexc + Daff satisfies Daff · Ei > 0. Therefore D is antinef whenever
−Dexc · Ei > Daff · Ei .
In the work of Lipman (see [19, §18]) one may find the following correspondence that
we will heavily use throughout this work.
Theorem 2.2. There is a one to one correspondence between antinef divisors in Div(X ′ )
and complete ideals in OX,O . In particular, antinef divisors in Λ correspond to m-primary
complete ideals.
In order to find the representative in the equivalence class of a given divisor D ∈
e The existence of such divisor is
DivQ (X ′ ) we will consider its so-called antinef closure D.
a consequence of the following results that can be found in [19, §18], but we also refer to
[24] and [20] for more insight.
Lemma 2.3. For any effective Q-divisor D ∈ DivQ (X ′ ) there exists a unique minimal
e ∈ Div(X ′ ) satisfying D
e > D that is called the antinef closure
integral antinef divisor D
e>D
of D. In particular, any antinef divisor D ′ such that D ′ > D must satisfy D ′ > D
e ∈
Proposition 2.4. An effective Q-divisor D ∈ DivQ (X ′ ) and its antinef closure D
′
Div(X ) are equivalent, i.e.
e
π∗ OX ′ (−D) = π∗ OX ′ (−D).
One of the advantages of working with antinef divisors is that they provide the following
characterization for the inclusion (or strict inclusion) of two given complete ideals.
Proposition 2.5. Let D1 , D2 be two antinef divisors in Div(X ′ ). Then:
i) π∗ OX ′ (−D1 ) ⊇ π∗ OX ′ (−D2 ) if and only if D1 6 D2 .
ii) π∗ OX ′ (−D1 ) ! π∗ OX ′ (−D2 ) if and only if D1 < D2 .
MULTIPLIER IDEALS IN TWO-DIMENSIONAL LOCAL RINGS
7
For non-antinef divisors we can only claim the following implication:
Proposition 2.6. Let D1 , D2 be two divisors in DivQ (X ′ ) such that D1 6 D2 . Then:
i) π∗ OX ′ (−D1 ) ⊇ π∗ OX ′ (−D2 ).
f1 6 D
f2 .
ii) D
The converses to these results are no longer true.
In general, the divisors that will be considered in this work are not antinef. In order
to compute their antinef closure we will use an inductive procedure called unloading
that was already described in the work of Enriques [7, IV.II.17] (for the case of smooth
varieties) and Laufer’s procedure to compute the fundamental cycle [17] (for varieties with
rational singularities). Here we will present a new version that is a generalization of both
the unloading procedures described by Casas-Alvero [5, §4.6] (for smooth varieties) and
Reguera [22] (for varieties with rational singularities).
Unloading procedure: Let D ∈ DivQ (X ′ ) be any Q-divisor. Its excess at the exceptional prime divisor Ei is the integer ρi = −⌈D⌉ · Ei . Denote by Θ the set of exceptional
components Ei 6 D with negative excesses, i.e.
Θ := {Ei 6 Dexc | ρi = −⌈D⌉ · Ei < 0}.
To unload values on this set is to consider the new divisor
X
D ′ = ⌈D⌉ +
ni Ei ,
where ni =
l
ρi
Ei2
m
Ei ∈Θ
. Notice that ni is the least integer number such that
(⌈D⌉ + ni Ei ) · Ei = −ρi + ni Ei2 6 0.
Remark 2.7. Casas-Alvero considered at each step just one component with negative
excess. Reguera also considered one component with negative excess but in her case she
also imposed ni = 1 at each step. In this sense, our approach is more economic from a
computational point of view. Furthermore, our procedure allows unloading on divisors
with affine part3, which will enable us to treat in a unified way multiplier ideals of both
curves and not necessarily m-primary complete ideals.
The correctness of the unloading procedure is a consequence of the following results.
Proposition 2.8. Let D ′ be the divisor obtained from a divisor D ∈ DivQ (X ′ ) after one
single unloading step. Then ID′ = ID .
Proof. It is clear from its construction that ID′ ⊆ ID . Pick f ∈ ID and let C = C ′ + C exc
be the total transform of the curve C defined by f = 0. We have vi (f ) > vi (⌈D⌉) > vi (D)
for all Ei . Consider any exceptional divisor Ei where D has negative excess, from the
inequality (C exc − vi (f )Ei ) · Ei > (⌈D⌉ − vi (⌈D⌉)Ei ) · Ei we deduce
−vi (f )Ei · Ei > (⌈D⌉ − vi (⌈D⌉)Ei ) · Ei
3Our
method also differs from the one considered by Lipman-Watanabe in [20].
8
M. ALBERICH-CARRAMIÑANA, J. ÀLVAREZ MONTANER, AND F. DACHS-CADEFAU
just because C exc · Ei 6 0. Equivalently (⌈D⌉ + (vi (f ) − vi (⌈D⌉))Ei ) · Ei 6 0 so it follows
that ni 6 vi (f ) − vi (⌈D⌉). In particular ni + vi (⌈D⌉) 6 vi (f ) and f ∈ ID′ .
e of a divisor D ∈ DivQ (X ′ ) is achieved after
Proposition 2.9. The antinef closure D
finitely many unloading steps.
Proof. We want to show that the divisors in the sequence
D 6 D1 = ⌈D⌉ < · · · < Dt < Dt+1 < · · ·
e then
obtained during the unloading procedure are all contained in the antinef closure D,
e
the result will follow since both D1 and D have integral coefficients and the inequalities
e and suppose that Dt 6 D.
e Notice
in the unloading sequence are strict. Clearly D1 6 D
e − Dt ) · Ei 6 −Dt · Ei .
that for any component Ei 6 Dt with negative excess we have (D
P
e − Dt =
Then, if we denote D
i mi Ei , the previous inequality becomes
e − Dt ) · Ei = (mi Ei + P mj Ej ) · Ei
(D
P j6=i
= mi Ei2 + j6=i mj Ej · Ei 6 −Dt · Ei .
P
Then, using that j6=i mj Ej · Ei > 0, we get
−Dt · Ei
mi >
,
Ei2
e have integer coefficients. It follows that Dt+1 is
where we used the fact that Dt and D
e
also contained in D.
2.3. Multiplier ideals. Let π : X ′ → X be a log-resolution of an ideal a ⊆ OX and let
F be the divisor such that a · OX ′ = OX ′ (−F ). The multiplier ideal (sheaf ) associated to
a and some rational number λ ∈ Q>0 is defined as4
J aλ = π∗ OX ′ (⌈Kπ − λF ⌉) .
For a detailed overview of the theory of multiplier ideals and the properties they satisfy,
we must refer to the book of Lazarsfeld [18]. For more details in the case that X has
rational singularities we also recommend to take a look at [24] and [25].
The definition of multiplier ideals is independent of the choice of log resolution. For
simplicity, we will always fix a given resolution. Multiplier ideals are complete and they are
invariants up to integral closure, i.e. J (aλ ) = J (aλ ), therefore, without loss of generality,
we may always assume that the ideal a is complete.
Moreover, if a is m-primary it follows
that its associated multiplier ideals J aλ are m-primary as well.
Some other important properties of multiplier ideals that we will use in this work are:
• Local vanishing theorem: Ri π∗ OX ′ (⌈Kπ − λF ⌉) = 0 for all i > 0 and all λ ∈ Q>0 .
• Skoda’s theorem: J aλ = a · J aλ−1 for all λ > dim OX,O = 2.
an abuse of notation, we will also denote J aλ its stalk at O so we will omit the word ”sheaf” if
no confusion arises.
4By
MULTIPLIER IDEALS IN TWO-DIMENSIONAL LOCAL RINGS
9
For the case
of principal ideals there is another version of Skoda’s theorem that states
that J aλ = a · J aλ−1 for all λ > 1. In particular, we have peridiocity of jumping
numbers.
Multiplier ideals come with an attached set of invariants that were studied systematically by Ein-Lazarsfeld-Smith-Varolin in [6]. Clearly
⌈Kπ − λF ⌉ > ⌈Kπ − (λ + ε) F ⌉
for any ε > 0, with equality if ε is small enough. Therefore the multiplier ideals form a
discrete nested sequence of ideals
OX,O ⊇ J (aλ0 ) ! J (aλ1 ) ! J (aλ2 ) ! ... ! J (aλi ) ! ...
indexed by an increasing sequence of rational numbers 0 = λ0 < λ1 < λ2 < . . . such that
for any c ∈ [λi , λi+1 ) it holds
J (aλi ) = J (ac ) ! J (aλi+1 ).
The λi are the so-called jumping numbers of the ideal a and the first jumping number
λ1 = lct(a) is the log-canonical threshold of a.
2.4. Contributing divisors. The jumps between multiplier ideals necessarily must occur at rational numbers λ ∈ Q which cause the strict inclusion of divisors
⌈Kπ − λF ⌉ < ⌈Kπ − (λ − ε) F ⌉
for any ε. If we take a close look at F = Fexc + Faff these rational numbers must belong
to the set of candidate jumping numbers
ki + m
| m ∈ Z>0
ei
Notice that for non-exceptional
components
Ei 6 Faff we have ki = 0 and their correo
n
m
sponding candidates ei | m ∈ Z>0 are indeed jumping numbers.
It is easy to check that not every candidate jumping number (coming from the exceptional part) is necessarily a jumping number. To separate the wheat from the chaff,
Tucker [25] developed the notion of divisor that contributes to a jumping number, building
upon previous work by Smith-Thompson [23].
Definition 2.10. A positive rational number λ is a candidate jumping number for a
reduced divisor G 6 F if it satisfies λei − ki ∈ Z>0 for any component Ei 6 G.
Definition 2.11. [25, Def. 3.1] A reduced divisor G 6 F for which λ is a candidate
jumping number is said to contribute to λ if
π∗ OX ′ (⌈Kπ − λF ⌉ + G) ! J (aλ )
Moreover, this contribution is critical if for any divisor 0 6 G′ < G we have
π∗ OX ′ (⌈Kπ − λF ⌉ + G′ ) = J (aλ ).
10
M. ALBERICH-CARRAMIÑANA, J. ÀLVAREZ MONTANER, AND F. DACHS-CADEFAU
Most often we will simply say that G is just a contributing or a critical divisor associated to λ. Critical divisors define complete ideals very close to a multiplier ideal in a
precise sense that will be explained in the forthcoming Corollary 5.5 in Section §5. One
may identify critical divisors with exceptional support through the following numerical
characterization.
Proposition 2.12. [25, Thm. 4.3] Let λ be a candidate jumping number for a reduced
divisor G ∈ Λ with connected support.
· If G = Ei is prime, then Ei is a critical divisor for λ if and only if
(⌈Kπ − λF ⌉ + Ei ) · Ei > 0.
· If G is reducible, then G is a critical divisor for λ if and only if
(⌈Kπ − λF ⌉ + G) · Ei = 0
for all divisors Ei in the support of G.
Moreover, critical divisors with exceptional support satisfy a nice geometric property
when viewed in the dual graph.
Proposition 2.13. [25, Cor. 4.2 & Thm 5.1] Let G be a critical divisor for a jumping
number λ. Then G is a connected chain in the dual graph of the log-resolution of a whose
ends must be either rupture or dicritical divisors.
Using all these properties, Tucker provides a simple algorithm to compute the set of all
jumping numbers (see [25, §6]). It boils down to the following steps:
Algorithm 2.14. (Jumping Numbers)
Input: A log-resolution of an ideal a ⊆ OX,O .
Output: List of Jumping Numbers of a.
• Jumping number:
· Compute the candidate jumping numbers for Fexc .
· Find all possible critical divisors using Prop. 2.13.
· Find which candidate jumping numbers can be realized as jumping number
associated to these critical divisors using Prop. 2.12.
· Plug in those jumping numbers coming from Faff .
3. An algorithm to compute jumping numbers and multiplier ideals
The aim of this section is to compute the jumping numbers and their corresponding
multiplier ideals of any given ideal a ⊆ OX,O . To such purpose, we fix a log-resolution
π : X ′ −→X of our ideal a. The
are the
Pr main ingredients we will have to deal with
′
relative canonical divisor Kπ = i=1 ki Ei ∈ ΛQ , and the divisor F ∈ Div(X ) such that
aOX ′ = OX ′ (−F ). Recall that we have a decomposition
s
r
X
X
ei Ei +
ei Ei
F = Fexc + Faff =
i=1
i=r+1
MULTIPLIER IDEALS IN TWO-DIMENSIONAL LOCAL RINGS
11
in terms of its exceptional and affine support.
We will provide a very simple algorithm that allows one to construct sequentially the
chain of multiplier ideals5
OX,O ⊇ J (aλ0 ) ! J (aλ1 ) ! J (aλ2 ) ! ... ! J (aλi ) ! ...
When X is a smooth surface, or even when X has a log-terminal singularity at O, the
multiplier ideal associated to λ0 = 0 is the whole ring, i.e. OX,O = J (aλ0 ). In general,
when X has a rational singularity we may have an strict inclusion OX,O ! J (aλ0 ). The
startingP
point of our method will be describing this ideal by means of the antinef closure
Dλ0 =
eλi 0 Ei of ⌊−Kπ ⌋ that we compute using the unloading procedure described in
Section §2.2.
As a consequence of our main result (see Theorem 3.5), the log-canonical threshold
satisfies the following formula6
ki + 1 + eλi 0
.
(3.1)
λ1 = lct(a) = min
i
ei
Then we describe its associated multiplier ideal J (aλ1 ) just computing the antinef
closure Dλ1 of ⌊λ1 F − Kπ ⌋ using the unloading procedure. Once we have the divisor
Dλ1 , we use an extension of Formula 3.1 given by Theorem 3.5, that computes the next
jumping number λ2 . Then we only have to follow the same strategy: the antinef closure
Dλ2 of ⌊λ2 F − Kπ ⌋, i.e. the multiplier ideal J (aλ2 ), will allow us to compute λ3 and so
on.
The main idea behind our method is a simple comparison between complete ideals.
Whenever we have two antinef divisors it is easy to check whether their corresponding
complete ideals satisfy a strict inclusion (see Proposition 2.5). To compare the ideals
associated to an antinef and a non-antinef divisor is more subtle and this is the situation
that we will have to deal with in this section.
To address this problem we will need some preliminary technical results.
Lemma 3.1. Let D1 , D2 be two divisors in Div(X ′ ) such that D1 6 D2 . Then, they have
f1 = D
f2 if and only if D
f1 > D2 .
the same antinef closure D
f1 6 D
f2 just because D1 6 D2 .
Proof. Recall that, by Proposition 2.6, we already have D
f1 > D2 then, by the definition of antinef closure (see Lemma 2.3), we also
Assume D
f1 > D
f2 > D2 and thus D
f1 = D
f2 . On the other hand, assume that D
f1 = D
f2 .
have D
5In
fact, we can compute the chain inside any desired fixed range [c, c′ ] ⊆ R:
′
J (ac ) = J (aλ0 ) ! J (aλ1 ) ! ... ! J (aλr ) = J (ac ) .
6When
X is smooth, or even when it has log-terminal singularities, we have Dλ0 = 0 so one recovers the
well-known formula for the log-canonical threshold.
12
M. ALBERICH-CARRAMIÑANA, J. ÀLVAREZ MONTANER, AND F. DACHS-CADEFAU
f1 = D
f2 > D2 as
Then, since the antinef closure of a divisor always contains it, we have D
desired.
f1 < D
f2
Corollary 3.2. Let D1 , D2 be two divisors in Div(X ′ ) such that D1 6 D2 . Then, D
f1 ) < vi (D2 ) for some Ei .
if and only if vi (D
f1 6 D
f2 also holds. The result then follows from
Proof. As D1 6 D2 , the inclusion D
Lemma 3.1.
Translated into the language of complete ideals, these results give a characterization of
the jump between two nested ideals, which will be a key ingredient in the proof of our
results.
Proposition 3.3. Let D1 , D2 be two divisors in Div(X ′ ) such that D1 6 D2 . Then:
f1 > D2 .
i) π∗ OX ′ (−D1 ) = π∗ OX ′ (−D2 ) if and only if D
f1 ) < vi (D2 ) for some Ei .
ii) π∗ OX ′ (−D1 ) ! π∗ OX ′ (−D2 ) if and only if vi (D
For convenience we also present this result in the form we will most commonly use it.
P ′
Corollary 3.4. Let λ′ < λ be rational numbers. Let Dλ′ = eλi Ei be the antinef closure
of ⌊λ′ F − Kπ ⌋. Then:
′
′
i) J (aλ ) = J (aλ ) if and only if ⌊λei − ki ⌋ 6 eλi for all Ei .
′
′
ii) J (aλ ) ! J (aλ ) if and only if ⌊λei − ki ⌋ > eλi for some Ei .
With the technical tools stated above we are ready for the main result of this section.
P ′
Theorem 3.5. Let a ⊆ OX,O be an ideal and let Dλ′ = eλi Ei be the antinef closure of
⌊λ′ F − Kπ ⌋ for a given λ′ ∈ Q>0 . Then,
′
ki + 1 + eλi
λ = min
i
ei
′
is the jumping number consecutive to λ .
Proof. Let us check first that λ′ < λ. Indeed, by the definition of antinef closure, the
′
′
integers eλi satisfy ⌊λ′ ei − ki ⌋ 6 eλi for any Ei , and hence:
′
λ′ <
ki + 1 + eλi
.
ei
′
Thus, we have an inclusion of ideals J (aλ ) ⊇ J (aλ ). Notice that for those divisors Ei
where the minimum is achieved we have
′
′
⌊λei − ki ⌋ = 1 + eλi > eλi
so the above inclusion of ideals is strict by Corollary 3.4. To conclude that λ is the jumping
number immediately after λ′ , we have to show that for any c ∈ R with λ′ 6 c < λ we
′
′
have J (aλ ) = J (ac ). Suppose the contrary, i.e., J (aλ ) ! J (ac ). By Corollary 3.4,
′
k +1+eλ
′
this c should satisfy ⌊λei − ki ⌋ > eλi or equivalently c > i ei i for some Ei , and this
contradicts the fact that λ is the minimum of these rational numbers.
MULTIPLIER IDEALS IN TWO-DIMENSIONAL LOCAL RINGS
13
The above result for the case λ′ = 0 gives a mild generalization of the well-known
formula for the log-canonical threshold in the smooth case. We point out that the antinef
closure of ⌊−Kπ ⌋ is 0 whenever X is smooth or, more generally, when it has log-terminal
singularities.
P λ0
ei Ei be the antinef closure of
Corollary 3.6. Let a ⊆ OX,O be an ideal. Let Dλ0 =
⌊−Kπ ⌋. Then,
ki + 1 + eλi 0
lct(a) = min
.
i
ei
Another easy application of the results above is the following result that should be
well-known to experts.
Corollary 3.7. Let λ1 be the log-canonical threshold of an ideal a ⊆ OX,O and assume
that X has at most a log-terminal singularity at O. Then J (aλ1 ) = m.
Proof. Since X has at most a log-terminal singularity, the log-canonical threshold is
ki + 1
lct(a) = λ1 = min
i
ei
for any divisor Ei and equality is achieved at least for a given
so it satisfies λ1 6 kie+1
i
divisor. In particular, for all Ei we have
⌊λ1 ei − ki ⌋ 6 1.
It follows from Proposition 2.6 that m ⊆ J (aλ1 )
OX,O and we get the desired result.
For non log-terminal singularities we may find examples where the codimension as
C-vector spaces of J (aλ0 ) ! J (aλ1 ) might be bigger than 1 (see Example 3.10).
Combining Theorem 3.5 and the unloading procedure described in Section §2.2 we can
describe a very simple algorithm that allows us to compute the chain of multiplier ideals:
Algorithm 3.8. (Jumping Numbers and Multiplier Ideals)
Input: A log-resolution of an ideal a ⊆ OX,O .
Output: List of Jumping Numbers of a and its corresponding Multiplier Ideals.
P
Set λ0 = 0 and compute the antinef closure Dλ0 = eλi 0 Ei of ⌊−Kπ ⌋ using the unloading procedure. From j = 1 , incrementing by 1
(Step j)
· Jumping number: Compute
)
(
λ
ki + 1 + ei j−1
λj = min
.
i
ei
· Multiplier ideal: Compute the antinef closure Dλj =
using the unloading procedure.
P
λ
ei j Ei of ⌊λj F −Kπ ⌋
14
M. ALBERICH-CARRAMIÑANA, J. ÀLVAREZ MONTANER, AND F. DACHS-CADEFAU
Notice that we may also find all the multiplier ideals in any given interval [c′ , c] of the
real line. In this case, our starting point would be computing the antinef closure Dc′ of
⌊c′ F − Kπ ⌋. To illustrate this method we consider an easy example in a smooth variety.
Example 3.9. Consider the ideal a = (x2 y 2 , x5 , y 5, xy 4 , x4 y) ⊆ C{x, y}. We represent
the relative canonical divisor Kπ and the divisor F in the dual graph as follows:
E2
E3
E1
E5
Vertex ordering
E4
2
4
1
4
2
5
10
4
10
5
Kπ
F
The blank dots correspond to dicritical divisors and their excesses are represented by
broken arrows7. For simplicity we will collect the values of any divisor in a vector. To
start with we have Kπ = (1, 2, 4, 2, 4) and F = (4, 5, 10, 5, 10). In the algorithm we will
have to perform some unloading steps so we will have to consider the intersection matrix
M = (Ei · Ej )16i,j65
−5
0
1
0
1
0 −2
1
0
0
1 −1
0
0
M =
.
1
0
0
0 −2
1
1
0
0
1 −1
The algorithm is performed as follows:
• We start computing the log-canonical threshold:
ki + 1
1
2 3 5 3 5
λ1 = lct(a) = min
= min
= .
, , , ,
i
i
ei
4 5 10 5 10
2
The divisor ⌊ 12 F − Kπ ⌋ = (1, 0, 1, 0, 1) is not antinef since it has excess −1 at E2 and E4 .
The first unloading step is to consider the divisor ⌊ 12 F − Kπ ⌋ + E2 + E4 = (1, 1, 1, 1, 1).
This divisor has excess −1 at E3 and E5 so we need to perform a second unloading step
to obtain the antinef closure Dλ1 = (1, 1, 2, 1, 2).
• The second Jumping Number is:
7
2+1 3+1 5+2 3+1 5+2
ki + 1 + eλi 1
λ2 = min
= min
= .
,
,
,
,
i
i
ei
4
5
10
5
10
10
7
Then we get ⌊ 10
F −Kπ ⌋ = (1, 1, 3, 1, 3). It has excess −1 at E1 , E2 and E4 and we obtain
the divisor (2, 2, 3, 2, 3) after the first unloading step. This divisor has excess −1 at E3 and
E5 and, after a second unloading step, we obtain the antinef closure Dλ2 = (2, 2, 4, 2, 4).
7The
broken arrows also represent the branches of the strict transform of a curve defined by a generic
f ∈ a.
MULTIPLIER IDEALS IN TWO-DIMENSIONAL LOCAL RINGS
15
• The third Jumping Number is:
9
2+2 3+2 5+4 3+2 5+4
ki + 1 + eλi 2
= min
= .
,
,
,
,
λ3 = min
i
i
ei
4
5
10
5
10
10
9
Then we get ⌊ 10
F − Kπ ⌋ = (2, 2, 5, 2, 5) that has excess −1 at E3 and E5 . After a single
unloading step we get the antinef closure Dλ3 = (2, 3, 5, 3, 5).
• The fourth Jumping Number is:
ki + 1 + eλi 3
2+2 3+3 5+5 3+3 5+5
λ4 = min
= min
= 1.
,
,
,
,
i
i
ei
4
5
10
5
10
Then we get ⌊F − Kπ ⌋ = Dλ4 = (3, 3, 6, 3, 6) since this divisor is antinef.
• The fifth Jumping Number is:
11
2+3 3+3 5+6 3+3 5+6
ki + 1 + eλi 4
= min
= .
λ5 = min
,
,
,
,
i
i
ei
4
5
10
5
10
10
F − Kπ ⌋ = (3, 3, 7, 3, 7) and, after a single unloading step, we obtain the
Then we get ⌊ 11
10
antinef closure Dλ5 = (3, 4, 7, 4, 7).
Now we will compute the chain of multiplier ideals of the plane curve defined by f =
(x − y 3)(y 2 − x3 ) ∈ C{x, y}. The product of two cusps sharing the origin O is a generic
element of the ideal a = (x2 y 2 , x5 , y 5 , xy 4, x4 y) considered above, so J (f λ ) = J (aλ )
for λ < 1. This example will illustrate how the non-exceptional components affect the
unloading procedure and, consequently, the list of jumping numbers for λ > 1.
2
Denote the total transform of the curve defined by f simply as F . We represent the
relative canonical divisor Kπ and the divisor F in the dual graph as follows:
E6
E2
0
E7
E3
E1
E5
Vertex ordering
E4
2
0
4
1
Kπ
4
2
1
5
1
10
4
10
5
F
The gray dots will represent here the affine components belonging to the strict transform
of the curve. The intersection matrix is now
−5
0
1
0
1 0 0
0 −2
1
0
0 0 0
1 −1
0
0 1 0
M = 1
.
0
0
0 −2
1 0 0
1
0
0
1 −1 0 1
16
M. ALBERICH-CARRAMIÑANA, J. ÀLVAREZ MONTANER, AND F. DACHS-CADEFAU
The algorithm is performed as follows:
• The log-canonical threshold is:
1
2 3 5 3 5 1 1
ki + 1
= min
= .
, , , , , ,
λ1 = lct(a) = min
i
i
ei
4 5 10 5 10 1 1
2
We get ⌊ 12 F − Kπ ⌋ = (1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0) and, as in the previous example, its antinef closure
is Dλ1 = (1, 1, 2, 1, 2, 0, 0).
• The second Jumping Number is:
ki + 1 + eλi 1
7
2+1 3+1 5+2 3+1 5+2 1 1
λ2 = min
= min
= .
,
,
,
,
, ,
i
i
ei
4
5
10
5
10 1 1
10
7
Then we get ⌊ 10
F −Kπ ⌋ = (1, 1, 3, 1, 3, 0, 0) and its antinef closure Dλ2 = (2, 2, 4, 2, 4, 0, 0).
• The third Jumping Number is:
9
2+2 3+2 5+4 3+2 5+4 1 1
ki + 1 + eλi 2
= min
= .
,
,
,
,
, ,
λ3 = min
i
i
ei
4
5
10
5
10 1 1
10
9
Then we get ⌊ 10
F −Kπ ⌋ = (2, 2, 5, 2, 5, 0, 0) and its antinef closure Dλ3 = (2, 3, 5, 3, 5, 0, 0).
• The fourth Jumping Number is:
2+2 3+3 5+5 3+3 5+5 1 1
ki + 1 + eλi 3
= min
= 1.
,
,
,
,
, ,
λ4 = min
i
i
ei
4
5
10
5
10 1 1
Then we get ⌊F − Kπ ⌋ = (3, 3, 6, 3, 6, 1, 1) but this divisor is not antinef because of the
non-exceptional components. Namely, we have excess −1 at E3 and E5 . To obtain the
antinef closure Dλ4 = (4, 5, 10, 5, 10, 1, 1) we need to perform seven unloading steps with
the intermediate divisors:
· (3, 3, 7, 3, 7, 1, 1) with excess −1 at E2 and E4 .
· (3, 4, 7, 4, 7, 1, 1) with excess −1 at E3 and E5 .
· (3, 4, 8, 4, 8, 1, 1) with excess −1 at E1 .
· (4, 4, 8, 4, 8, 1, 1) with excess −1 at E3 and E5 .
· (4, 4, 9, 4, 9, 1, 1) with excess −1 at E2 and E4 .
· (4, 5, 9, 5, 9, 1, 1) with excess −1 at E3 and E5 .
If we compare with the m-primary ideal a we should notice that the affine components
of ⌊F − Kπ ⌋ force us to add more exceptional components when computing its antinef
closure and consequently, this will give a different jumping number in the next step.
• The fifth Jumping Number is:
ki + 1 + eλi 4
3
2 + 4 3 + 5 5 + 10 3 + 5 5 + 10 2 2
λ5 = min
= min
= .
,
,
,
,
, ,
i
i
ei
4
5
10
5
10 1 1
2
Then we get ⌊ 23 F −Kπ ⌋ = (5, 5, 11, 5, 11, 1, 1) and its antinef closure Dλ5 = (5, 6, 12, 6, 12, 1, 1).
MULTIPLIER IDEALS IN TWO-DIMENSIONAL LOCAL RINGS
17
Consider a normal surface X with a singularity at O. Given a minimal resolution
π : X ′ −→X of X, Artin [4] introduced the fundamental cycle as the unique smallest nonzero effective divisor with exceptional support that is antinef. Moreover he proved that
the singularity is rational if and only if the arithmetical genus of the fundamental cycle
is zero.
We have that π is also a minimal log-resolution of the maximal ideal m ⊆ OX,O and
the fundamental cycle is the divisor F such that m · OX ′ = OX ′ (−F ). To compute its
)·F
arithmetical genus we can use the formula pa (F ) = 1 + (Kπ +F
(see [3]).
2
This characterization gives us a good source of examples of surfaces with rational singularities.
Example 3.10. Consider a surface X with a rational singularity at O whose minimal
resolution π : X ′ −→X has six exceptional components E1 , . . . , E6 with the following dual
graph and intersection matrix:
E3
E4
E5
E2
E1
E6
−4
1
1
1
1
1
1 −5
0
0
0
0
1
0 −5
0
0
0
1
0
0 −5
0
0
1
0
0
0 −5
0
1
0
0
0
0 −5
The fundamental cycle is the divisor F = (2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1) and the relative canonical
14
divisor is Kπ = (− 35 , − 14
, − 14
, − 15
, − 14
, − 14
) so the singularity is not even log-canonical.
15
15
15
15
The multiplier ideals corresponding to λ0 = 0 and λ1 = lct(m) = 94 are given by the
antinef divisors Dλ0 = (2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1) and Dλ1 = (3, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1). Notice that J (mλ0 ) = m
and, using the techniques of [1], we get that the codimension between these multiplier
ideals is 4.
3.1. Implementation. We have implemented Algorithm 3.8 in the Computer Algebra
system Macaulay 2 [12]. The scripts of the source code as well as the output in full detail
of some examples are available at the web page
www.pagines.ma1.upc.edu/~jalvz/multiplier.html
We implemented Tucker’s Algorithm 2.14 as well in order to compare both approaches.
Of course, once we have the list of jumping numbers we may use the unloading procedure
of Section §2.2 to describe the corresponding multiplier ideals. We have also implemented
this extended version of Tucker’s algorithm and it turns out that our method is much
faster.
18
M. ALBERICH-CARRAMIÑANA, J. ÀLVAREZ MONTANER, AND F. DACHS-CADEFAU
For example, we have tested the case of an m-primary ideal a whose corresponding
dual graph has 35 vertices distributed in three branches only sharing the origin and each
branch has three rupture divisors.
E3
E1
E5
E2
E4
E6
E8
E22
E23
E25
E27
E9
E10
E11
E7
E26
E28
E16
E29
E24
E31
E30
E32
E15
E14
E13
E17
E19
E21
E18
E34
E33
E35
E12
E20
This example has 56986 jumping numbers in the interval (0, 2]. Using the extended
version of Tucker’s algorithm it takes 897.298 seconds to compute the whole list of jumping
numbers and their corresponding multiplier ideals. Using our method it only takes 372.165
seconds, i.e. it is roughly 9 minutes faster.
The main difference between the two algorithms stems in the fact that Tucker needs
to find first all the possible critical divisors. We will see in the next section that our
algorithm can be understood as a method to find a unique and very precise contributing
divisor.
The input that we use in both algorithms, i.e. the log-resolution π : X ′ → X of an
ideal a ⊆ OX , is encoded using the intersection matrix and the vector of values for the
divisor F such that a · OX ′ = OX ′ (−F ). An algorithm to compute this data from a set
of generators of the ideal a has been described in [2]. An implementation in Macaulay
2 will be available soon. For principal ideals this can be done using the Singular [13]
package alexpoly.lib.
4. Jumping Divisors
The theory of critical divisors developed by Tucker [25] focuses on complete ideals very
close to a given multiplier ideal. The aim of this section is to understand the whole jump
between two consecutive multiplier ideals. To such purpose we introduce the following
natural definition:
Definition 4.1. Let λ be a jumping numbers of an ideal a ⊆ OX,O . A reduced divisor
G 6 F for which λ is a candidate jumping number is called a jumping divisor for λ if
J (aλ−ε ) = π∗ OX ′ (⌈Kπ − λF ⌉ + G),
for ε small enough. We say that a jumping divisor is minimal if no proper subdivisor is
a jumping divisor for λ, i.e.
J (aλ−ε ) ! π∗ OX ′ (⌈Kπ − λF ⌉ + G′ )
MULTIPLIER IDEALS IN TWO-DIMENSIONAL LOCAL RINGS
19
for any 0 6 G′ < G.
Remark 4.2. Any reduced divisor G 6 F for which λ is a candidate jumping number
defines an ideal nested between two consecutive multiplier ideals
J (aλ−ε ) ⊇ π∗ OX ′ (⌈Kπ − λF ⌉ + G) ⊇ J (aλ ).
Hence, a jumping divisor for λ is a contributing divisor to λ. In particular, a minimal
jumping divisor can be understood as the minimal contribution which defines the preceding multiplier ideal.
It is a striking fact that the methods used in the previous section, in particular our
main result Theorem 3.5, will allow us to construct the unique minimal jumping divisor
associated to a jumping number. In fact, we will see in Corollary 4.7 that the only jumping
divisors are those reduced divisors D 6 F satisfying Gλ 6 D 6 Hλ , where Gλ and Hλ
are defined as follows:
P
Definition 4.3. Let λ be a jumping number of an ideal a ⊆ OX,O . Let Dλ−ε = eλ−ε
Ei
i
be the antinef closure of ⌊(λ − ε)F − Kπ ⌋ for ε small enough. Then we define:
· Maximal jumping divisor: Is the reduced divisor Hλ 6 F supported on those
components Ei for which λei − ki ∈ Z>0 . Equivalently
Hλ = ⌈Kπ − (λ − ε)F ⌉ − ⌈Kπ − λF ⌉.
· Minimal jumping divisor: Is the reduced divisor Gλ 6 F supported on those
components Ei for which
ki + 1 + eλ−ε
i
,
ei
i.e. supported on those divisors where the minimum considered in Theorem 3.5 is
achieved.
λ=
It is clear that Hλ is a jumping divisor and Gλ 6 Hλ . In fact, any reduced divisor
G 6 F that contributes to λ satisfies G 6 Hλ . We will prove next that Gλ deserves the
given name.
Proposition 4.4. Let λ be a jumping number of an ideal a ⊆ OX,O . The reduced divisor
Gλ is a jumping divisor.
Proof. Since Gλ 6 Hλ , we have ⌊(λ − ε)F − Kπ ⌋ 6 ⌊λF − Kπ ⌋ − Gλ and therefore
J (aλ−ε ) ⊇ π∗ OX ′ (⌈Kπ − λF ⌉ + Gλ ).
P
For the reverse inclusion, let Dλ−ε = eλ−ε
Ei be the antinef closure of ⌊(λ−ε)F −Kπ ⌋.
i
We want to check that ⌊λF − Kπ ⌋ − Gλ 6 Dλ−ε . To this purpose we only need to consider
the following cases:
· If Ei 6 Gλ then we have λ =
ki +1+eλ−ε
i
.
ei
In particular ⌊λei − ki ⌋ − 1 = eλ−ε
.
i
20
M. ALBERICH-CARRAMIÑANA, J. ÀLVAREZ MONTANER, AND F. DACHS-CADEFAU
· If Ei 66 Gλ then we have λ <
follows.
ki +1+eλ−ε
i
.
ei
Thus ⌊λei − ki ⌋ < 1 + eλ−ε
and the result
i
The unicity of the jumping divisor Gλ is a consequence of the following more general
statement
Theorem 4.5. Let λ be a jumping number of an ideal a ⊆ OX,O . Any contributing divisor
G 6 F associated to λ satisfies either:
· J (aλ−ε ) = π∗ OX ′ (⌈Kπ − λF ⌉ + G) ! J (aλ ) if and only if Gλ 6 G, or
· J (aλ−ε ) ! π∗ OX ′ (⌈Kπ − λF ⌉ + G) ! J (aλ ) otherwise.
Proof. Since G 6 Hλ , we have ⌊(λ − ε)F − Kπ ⌋ 6 ⌊λF − Kπ ⌋ − G and therefore
J (aλ−ε ) ⊇ π∗ OX ′ (⌈Kπ − λF ⌉ + G).
Now assume Gλ 6 G. Then ⌊λF − Kπ ⌋ − G 6 ⌊λF − Kπ ⌋ − Gλ , and using the fact
that Gλ is a jumping divisor we obtain the equality J (aλ−ε ) = π∗ OX ′ (⌈Kπ − λF ⌉ + G).
If Gλ 66 G we may consider a component Ei 6 Gλ such that Ei 66 G. Notice that we
have
vi (Dλ−ε ) = eλ−ε
= λei − ki − 1 < λei − ki = vi (⌊λF − Kπ ⌋ − G)
P λ−ε i
where Dλ−ε =
ei Ei is the antinef closure of ⌊(λ − ε)F − Kπ ⌋. Therefore, by Proposition 3.3, we get the strict inclusion
J (aλ−ε ) ! π∗ OX ′ (⌈Kπ − λF ⌉ + G).
Corollary 4.6. Let λ be a jumping number of an ideal a ⊆ OX,O . Then Gλ is the unique
minimal jumping divisor associated to λ.
Notice that Theorem 4.5 also describes all the jumping divisors associated to a given
jumping number. Namely, we have
Corollary 4.7. Let λ be a jumping number of an ideal a ⊆ OX,O . Then, any reduced
divisor in the interval Gλ 6 D 6 Hλ is a jumping divisor.
It is clear from its definition that maximal jumping divisors are periodic, i.e. Hλ =
Hλ+1 for any jumping number λ. On the other hand, critical divisors do not satisfy any
periodicity condition. One may find examples where a divisor G is a critical divisor for
the jumping number λ but not for λ + 1 and vice versa. For minimal jumping divisors we
have:
Proposition 4.8. Let λ be a jumping number of an ideal a ⊆ OX,O and Gλ its associated
minimal jumping divisor. Then we have:
i) If λ 6 1 then Gλ 6 Gλ+1 .
ii) If λ > 1 then Gλ = Gλ+1 .
MULTIPLIER IDEALS IN TWO-DIMENSIONAL LOCAL RINGS
Proof. Assume that there exists a prime divisor Ei 6 Gλ such that Ei
a sufficiently small ε > 0 we have
ki + 1 + eλ−ε
i
λ=
ei
21
Gλ+1 . Then, for
(λ−ε)+1
and
ki + 1 + ei
λ+1<
ei
P λ−ε
where Dλ−ε =
ei Ei denotes the antinef closure of ⌊(λ − ε)F − Kπ ⌋ and equivalently,
P (λ−ε)+1
D(λ−ε)+1 = ei
Ei is the antinef closure of ⌊((λ − ε) + 1)F − Kπ ⌋.
Therefore
(λ−ε)+1
ki + 1 + ei
ki + 1 + eλ−ε
i
+1<
ei
ei
(λ−ε)+1
or equivalently eλ−ε
+ ei < ei
i
contradiction.
. Then we have a · J (aλ−ε ) 6⊆ J (a(λ−ε)+1 ) so we get a
(λ−ε)+1
For λ > 1 we have an equality eλ−ε
+ ei = ei
i
result follows.
because of Skoda’s theorem so the
Let λ′ < λ be two consecutive jumping numbers of an ideal a ⊆ OX,O . It is quite
surprising that the minimal jumping divisor Gλ gives such nice approach to the under′
standing of the jump from J (aλ ) to its preceding multiplier ideal J (aλ ). Taking into
account that its construction is based on Theorem 3.5, where λ is obtained from the an′
tinef divisor associated to J (aλ ), it would seem more natural to consider the jump in the
′
other direction. It turns out that the jump from J (aλ ) to J (aλ ) does not behave that
nicely.
Proposition 4.9. Let λ′ < λ be two consecutive jumping numbers of an ideal a ⊆ OX,O
and Dλ′ be the antinef closure of ⌊λ′ F − Kπ ⌋. Then we have:
′
i) J (aλ ) ! π∗ OX ′ (−Dλ′ − Gλ ) = J (aλ ).
′
ii) J (aλ ) ! π∗ OX ′ (⌈Kπ − (λ − ε)F ⌉ − Gλ ) = J (aλ )
P λ′
P λ
ei Ei , Dλ =
Proof. Let Dλ′ =
ei Ei be the antinef closures of ⌊λ′ F − Kπ ⌋ and
⌊λF − Kπ ⌋ respectively.
i) Since Gλ is a jumping divisor we have ⌊λF −Kπ ⌋−Gλ 6 Dλ′ , and hence ⌊λF −Kπ ⌋ 6
Dλ′ + Gλ . This gives the inclusion π∗ OX ′ (−Dλ′ − Gλ ) ⊆ J (aλ ).
In order to check the reverse inclusion π∗ OX ′ (−Dλ′ − Gλ ) ⊇ J (aλ ), it is enough, using
Proposition 3.3, to prove vi (Dλ′ + Gλ ) 6 vi (Dλ ) = eλi for any component Ei . We have
′
′
eλi 6 eλi just because J (aλ ) ! J (aλ ) and the inequality is strict when Ei 6 Gλ , so the
result follows.
ii) Let D ′ be the antinef closure of ⌊(λ − ε)F − Kπ ⌋ + Gλ . Since Gλ 6 Hλ we have
⌊(λ − ε)F − Kπ ⌋ + Gλ 6 ⌊λF − Kπ ⌋ 6 Dλ
so the inclusion π∗ OX ′ (⌈Kπ −(λ−ε)F ⌉−Gλ ) ⊇ J (aλ )Pholds. In order to prove the reverse
inclusion we will introduce an auxiliary divisor D =
di Ei ∈ Λ defined as follows:
22
M. ALBERICH-CARRAMIÑANA, J. ÀLVAREZ MONTANER, AND F. DACHS-CADEFAU
· di = ⌊(λ − ε)ei − ki ⌋ + 1 if Ei 6 Gλ ,
′
· di = eλi
if Ei 6 Hλ but Ei 66 Gλ ,
· di = ⌊(λ − ε)ei − ki ⌋
otherwise.
Clearly we have ⌊(λ − ε)F − Kπ ⌋ + Gλ 6 D, but we also have ⌊λF − Kπ ⌋ 6 D. Indeed,
· For Ei 6 Gλ we have ⌊λei − ki ⌋ = λei − ki = ⌊(λ − ε)ei − ki ⌋ + 1 = di .
′
· If λ is a candidate for Ei but Ei 66 Gλ , ⌊λei − ki ⌋ = λei − ki < 1 + eλi , hence
′
⌊λei − ki ⌋ 6 eλi = di .
· Otherwise ⌊λei − ki ⌋ = ⌊(λ − ε)ei − ki ⌋ = di .
e On the other hand D 6 D ′ .
Therefore, taking antinef closures, we have D ′ 6 Dλ 6 D.
′
λ′
′
Namely, vi (D ) > ei at any Ei because ⌊λ F − Kπ ⌋ 6 ⌊(λ − ε)F − Kπ ⌋ + Gλ . Moreover,
vi (D ′ ) > ⌊(λ − ε)ei − ki ⌋ + δiGλ by definition of antinef closure. Here, δiGλ = 1 if Ei 6 Gλ
e 6 D ′ , which
and zero otherwise. Thus vi (D ′ ) > vi (D) as desired. As a consquence D
e gives D
e = D ′ = Dλ and the result follows.
together with the previous D ′ 6 Dλ 6 D,
Remark 4.10. Contrary to the case of Theorem 4.5, Gλ may not be minimal. In fact, we
will see in Example 5.8 a divisor G < Gλ satisfying:
′
J (aλ ) = π∗ OX ′ (−Dλ′ ) ! π∗ OX ′ (−Dλ′ − G) = J (aλ ) .
Despite the fact that the antinef closure of both ⌊(λ −ε)F −Kπ ⌋ and ⌊λ′ F −Kπ ⌋ is Dλ′ ,
it is quite remarkable that the above jumping property does not hold taking ⌊λ′ F − Kπ ⌋,
i.e. the equality π∗ OX ′ (⌊λ′ F − Kπ ⌋ − Gλ ) = J (aλ ) is not always true.
4.1. Invariance of the minimal jumping divisor with respect to the log-resolution.
Multiplier ideals and jumping numbers are known to be independent of the chosen logresolution of the initial ideal a ⊆ OX,O . The aim of this section is to prove that the
minimal jumping divisor is generically independent of the log-resolution in a sense that
we will make precise below. As a consequence of Proposition 5.6 and Corollary 5.5 in Section §5, critical divisors will also be generically independent of the log-resolution. This is
a remarkable fact since, as it was pointed out by Tucker in [25, Remark 3.4], there is no
reason to believe that critical divisors (and by extension minimal jumping divisors) are
independent of the resolution since they depend on all the divisorial valuations appearing
in F .
We start fixing some notation that we will use in this section. Let π ′ : X ′ −→X be the
minimal log-resolution of an ideal a ⊆ OX,O . Any other log-resolution π : Y −→X factors
through π ′ , i.e. there is a birational morphism g : Y −→X ′ such that π = π ′ ◦ g (see [19,
Theorem 4.1]).
For a given jumping number λ of a we will denote G′λ the minimal jumping divisor of π ′
and E1′ , . . . , Er′ the exceptional components of E ′ = Exc(π ′ ). If Gλ and E1 , . . . , Es are the
minimal jumping divisor and the exceptional components of E = Exc(π) for any other
log-resolution π, we will enumerate them setting Ei equal to the strict transform by g of
MULTIPLIER IDEALS IN TWO-DIMENSIONAL LOCAL RINGS
23
Ei′ forP1 6 i 6 r. If no confusion arise, we will use
Pthe same symbol to denote a divisor
D = ri=1 di Ei′ on X ′ or its strict transform D = ri=1 di Ei on Y .
Theorem 4.11. With the previous notations, Gλ is independent of the log-resolution
π if and only if π does not include any blowing-up at points in the intersection of two
components of the minimal jumping divisor G′λ of the minimal log-resolution.
Actually, from the proof of this result, we can express the minimal jumping divisor of
any resolution. To such purpose we need to fix some notation:
A reduced divisor with exceptional support D = Ei1 + · · · + Eim 6 E is a chain with
ends Ei1 and Eim if aD (Ei1 ) = aD (Eim ) = 1 and aD (Eik ) = 2 for any other 1 < k < m.
Given Ej1 , Ej2 6 E, we say that the chain above connects Ej1 and Ej2 if Ej1 ∈ Adj (Ei1 )
and Ej2 ∈ Adj (Eim ). Observe that if Ej1 and Ej2 are adjacent in E, a chain connecting
them will be D = 0.
Corollary 4.12. Keeping the above notations we have
(4.1)
Gλ = G′λ +
X
Dij
E ′ +E ′ 6G′
i
j
λ
Ei′ ·Ej′ =1
where Dij is a chain connecting Ei and Ej .
Consider generic log-resolutions as those obtained from a minimal one by further
blowing-ups at simple (and hence generic) points on the exceptional components. Then,
Theorem 4.11 states that generic log-resolutions have the same minimal jumping divisor. This generictiy may be formulated, when X is smooth, in terms of valuations in the
valuative tree V of Favre-Jonsson [8]. Consider the dual graphs Γ and Γ′ of E and E ′
respectively, embedded in the valuative tree V as in [8, Chapter 6] and let νi denote the
divisorial valuation centered at Ei .
Corollary 4.13. The minimal jumping divisor Gλ of π equals the minimal jumping divisor
G′λ if and only if Γ has no vertex inside any segment ]νi , νj [ for which Ei′ and Ej′ are
adjacent in E ′ and belong to G′λ .
Proof of Theorem 4.11.
Let λ′ < λ be two consecutive jumping numbers of a. We
will argue by induction on the number of blowing-ups needed to reach Y from a minimal
resolution. In order to simplify the notation, we will assume throughout this proof that X ′
also dominates a minimal log-resolution and that Y is obtained from X ′ by one blowingup g : Y −→X ′ at a closed point p ∈ X ′ giving the exceptional component Es . Assume
that (4.1) holds on X ′ and let us prove it on Y . Notice that, keeping the notation used
in this section, we are in the case r + 1 = s.
P
P
Let F ′ = ri=1 ei Ei′ and F = si=1 ei Ei be the divisors in X ′ and Y respectively such
′
′ (−F ) and aOY = OY (−F ).
′
We also consider the antinef divisors
that aO
P
PXr =λ′OX
′
′
′
′
Dλ′ = i=1 ei Ei and Dλ′ = si=1 eλi Ei for which J (aλ ) = π∗′ OX ′ (−Dλ′ ′ ) = π∗ OY (−Dλ′ )
24
M. ALBERICH-CARRAMIÑANA, J. ÀLVAREZ MONTANER, AND F. DACHS-CADEFAU
sharing the first r coefficients since multiplier ideals are independent of the log-resolution.
Moreover, by Theorem 3.5
′
′
ki + 1 + eλi
ki + 1 + eλi
= min
,
λ = min
16i6s
16i6r
ei
ei
clearly demonstrating that the strict transform of G′λ is contained in Gλ . In particular,
′
′
λei − ki = 1 + eλi if and only if Ei 6 Gλ and λei − ki < 1 + eλi otherwise.
We distinguish two cases:
i) The closed point p lies only on one exceptional divisor Ej′ . Then we have es = ej ,
′
′
ks = kj + 1 and eλs = eλj and thus
′
′
vs (⌊λF − Kπ ⌋) = ⌊λes − ki ⌋ = ⌊λej − kj ⌋ − 1 6 eλj = eλs .
Hence Es can not belong to Gλ .
ii) The closed point p lies on the intersection of two exceptional divisors Ej′ 1 and Ej′ 2 .
′
′
′
Then we have es = ej1 + ej2 , ks = kj1 + kj2 + 1 and eλs = eλj1 + eλj2 so
′
′
′
vs (⌊λF − Kπ ⌋) = ⌊λes − ks ⌋ = ⌊λej1 − kj1 + λej2 − kj2 ⌋ − 1 6 eλj1 + eλj2 + 1 = eλs + 1,
and equality holds if and only if Ej′ 1 + Ej′ 2 6 Gλ . In particular, Es does not belong to Gλ
whenever none or just one of the components Ej′ 1 , Ej′ 2 belong to G′λ .
4.2. Geometric properties of minimal jumping divisors in the dual graph. Assume that a critical divisor G associated to a jumping number λ has exceptional support.
One of the key ingredients in Tucker’s algorithm for the computation of jumping numbers
is that G satisfies some nice geometric conditions when viewed in the dual graph: G is a
connected chain and its ends must be either rupture or dicritical divisors (see Proposition
2.13). Then, it is natural to ask whether jumping divisors satisfy analogous properties.
Throughout this section we will also assume that the minimal jumping divisor Gλ has
exceptional support. Then, it may have several connected components in the dual graph
and these components are not necessarily chains. However, we can still control the ends
of each component. To prove the main result of this section (see Theorem 4.17) we need
some preliminary results first. Keep the notations of Section §2.
Lemma 4.14. Let λ be a jumping number of an ideal a ⊆ OX,O . For any component Ei
of the minimal jumping divisor Gλ we have
X
(⌈Kπ − λF ⌉ + Gλ ) · Ei = −2 + λρi +
{λej − kj } + aGλ (Ei ) .
Ej ∈Adj(Ei )
Proof. For any Ei 6 Gλ we have
(⌈Kπ − λF ⌉ + Gλ ) · Ei = ((Kπ − λF ) + {−Kπ + λF } + Gλ − Ei + Ei ) · Ei =
= (Kπ + Ei ) · Ei − λF · Ei + {λF − Kπ } · Ei + (Gλ − Ei ) · Ei .
MULTIPLIER IDEALS IN TWO-DIMENSIONAL LOCAL RINGS
25
Let us now compute each summand separately. Firstly, the adjunction formula gives
(Kπ + Ei ) · Ei = −2 because Ei ∼
= P1 . As for the second and fourth terms, the equality −λF · Ei = λρi follows from the definition of the excesses, and clearly aGλ (Ei ) =
(Gλ − Ei ) · Ei because Ei 6 Gλ .
Therefore it only remains to prove that
X
(4.2)
{λF − Kπ } · Ei =
{λej − kj } ,
Ej ∈Adj(Ei )
which is also quite immediate. Indeed, writing
{λF − Kπ } =
r
X
{λej − kj } Ej ,
j=1
equality (4.2) follows by observing that (for j 6= i), Ej ·Ei = 1 if and only if Ej ∈ Adj (Ei ),
and the term corresponding to j = i vanishes because we have λei − ki ∈ Z.
Remark
4.15. It is important to notice that (⌈Kπ − λF ⌉ + Gλ ) · Ei ∈ Z, that is −2 +
P
Ej ∈Adj(Ei ) {λej − kj } + λρi + aGλ (Ei ) ∈ Z.
The following result is an analogue of the numerical conditions that critical divisors
satisfy (see Proposition 4.19). Unfortunately it does not provide a characterization of
minimal jumping divisors.
Proposition 4.16. Let λ be a jumping number of an ideal a ⊆ OX,O . For any component
Ei 6 Gλ of the minimal jumping divisor Gλ we have
(⌈Kπ − λF ⌉ + Gλ ) · Ei > 0.
Proof. Let Gλ be the minimal jumping divisor. Given a prime divisor Ei 6 Gλ we consider
the short exact sequence
0 −→ OX ′ (⌈Kπ − λF ⌉ + Gλ − Ei ) −→ OX ′ (⌈Kπ − λF ⌉ + Gλ ) −→
−→ OEi (⌈Kπ − λF ⌉ + Gλ ) −→ 0
Pushing it forward to X we get
0 −→ π∗ OX ′ (⌈Kπ − λF ⌉ + Gλ − Ei ) −→ π∗ OX ′ (⌈Kπ − λF ⌉ + Gλ ) −→
−→ H 0 (Ei , OEi (⌈Kπ − λF ⌉ + Gλ )) ⊗ CO ,
where CO denotes the skyscraper sheaf supported at O with fibre C. The minimality of
Gλ (see Theorem 4.5) implies that
π∗ OX ′ (⌈Kπ − λF ⌉ + Gλ − Ei ) 6= π∗ OX ′ (⌈Kπ − λF ⌉ + Gλ ) .
Thus H 0 (Ei , OEi (⌈Kπ − λF ⌉ + Gλ )) 6= 0, or equivalently (⌈Kπ − λF ⌉ + Gλ )·Ei > 0.
With the above ingredients we can provide the following geometric property of minimal
jumping divisors when viewed in the dual graph.
26
M. ALBERICH-CARRAMIÑANA, J. ÀLVAREZ MONTANER, AND F. DACHS-CADEFAU
Theorem 4.17. Let Gλ be the minimal jumping divisor associated to a jumping number
λ of an ideal a ⊆ OX,O . Then the ends of a connected component of Gλ must be either
rupture or dicritical divisors.
Proof. Assume that an end Ei of a connected component of Gλ is neither a rupture nor a
dicritical divisor. It means that Ei has no excess, i.e. ρi = 0, and that it has one or two
adjacent divisors, say Ej and El , in the dual graph but at most one of them belongs to
Gλ .
For the case that Ei has two adjacent divisors Ej and El the formula given in lemma
4.14 reduces to (⌈Kπ − λF ⌉ + Gλ ) · Ei = −2 + {λej − kj } + {λel − kl } + λρi + aGλ (Ei ).
Then:
· If Ei has valence one in Gλ , e.g. El 66 Gλ then
(⌈Kπ − λF ⌉ + Gλ ) · Ei = −2 + {λel − kl } + 1 < 0.
· If Ei is an isolated component of Gλ , i.e., Ej , El 66 Gλ then
(⌈Kπ − λF ⌉ + Gλ ) · Ei = −2 + {λej − kj } + {λel − kl } < 0.
If Ei has just one adjacent divisor Ej , i.e. Ei is an end of the dual graph, the formula
reduces to (⌈Kπ − λF ⌉ + Gλ ) · Ei = −2 + {λej − kj } + λρi + aGλ (Ei ). Then:
· If Ei has valence one in Gλ then (⌈Kπ − λF ⌉ + Gλ ) · Ei = −2 + 1 < 0
· If Ei is an isolated component of Gλ then
(⌈Kπ − λF ⌉ + Gλ ) · Ei = −2 + {λej − kj } < 0.
In any case we get a contradiction with Proposition 4.16.
Remark 4.18. It follows from [26, Theorem 3.3] that the minimal jumping divisor associated to the log-canonical threshold is connected in the case that X is smooth.
As a consequence we may also give the following refinement of Proposition 4.16.
Proposition 4.19. Let λ be a jumping number of an m-primary ideal a ⊆ OX,O . If
Ei 6 Gλ is neither a rupture nor a dicritical component of the minimal jumping divisor
Gλ we have
(⌈Kπ − λF ⌉ + Gλ ) · Ei = 0.
Proof. Assume that Ei 6 Gλ is neither a rupture or a dicritical component. In particular,
it is not the end of a connected component of Gλ . Thus, Ei has exactly two adjacent
components Ej and El in Gλ , and its excess is ρi = 0. The formula given in Lemma 4.14
reduces to
(⌈Kπ − λF ⌉ + Gλ ) · Ei = −2 + λρi + {λej − kj } + {λel − kl } + aGλ (Ei ) .
Notice that aGλ (Ei ) = 2, and also {λej − kj } = {λel − kl } = 0 because Ej and El are
components of Gλ , so finally (⌈Kπ − λF ⌉ + Gλ ) · Ei = 0.
MULTIPLIER IDEALS IN TWO-DIMENSIONAL LOCAL RINGS
27
5. Minimal contributing divisors
The theory of minimal jumping divisors introduced in Section §4 can be included in a
more general framework that we will describe in this section. To such purpose we will give
our own perspective of the work of Hyry-Järviletho [14] and its relation with the theory
of contributing divisors of Tucker [25].
Let λ be a jumping number of an ideal a ⊆ OX,O . Recall that a reduced divisor G 6 F
that contributes to λ defines an ideal nested between two consecutive multiplier ideals
J (aλ−ε ) ⊇ π∗ OX ′ (⌈Kπ − λF ⌉ + G) ! J (aλ ).
We may interpret that λ is parametrized by the set of nested ideals defined by contributions
but this is far from being a one-to-one correspondence. An easy way to detect such a
nested ideal is finding a suitable critical divisor using Tucker’s algorithm. The approach
given in the previous sections is more economical in the sense that each jumping number
is parametrized by its unique minimal jumping divisor Gλ or equivalently, its preceding
multiplier ideal.
Hyry-Järviletho [14] give a similar approach where jumping numbers are parametrized
by general antinef divisors8, or equivalently complete ideals not necessarily nested in the
chain of multiplier ideals. We should point out that their results also hold for the case that
X has rational singularities since
are based on divisorial considerations.
P their arguments
′
Given any antinef divisor D = di Ei ∈ Div(X ), they considered the following notions:
· Jumping number corresponding to D:
ki + 1 + d i
.
λD := min
i
ei
· Support of a jumping number corresponding to D:
ki + 1 + d i
.
SD := i | λD =
ei
· Contributing divisor associated to D:
GD :=
X
Ei .
i∈SD
Hyry-Järviletho proved in [14, Proposition 1] that all jumping numbers of a can be
obtained in this way: as λD for a suitable antinef divisor D ∈ Div(X ′ ) (or equivalently
a complete ideal ID ). Moreover, they give in [14, Theorem 1] a combinatorial criterion
that detects the existence of such antinef divisors. The simplest parametrizations they
used to describe the set of jumping numbers are given by antinef divisors corresponding
to critical divisors (see [14, Theorem 2]).
8Hyry-Järviletho
only consider the case of m-primary ideals on smooth surfaces and consequently antinef
divisors with exceptional support but their ideas also hold in general
28
M. ALBERICH-CARRAMIÑANA, J. ÀLVAREZ MONTANER, AND F. DACHS-CADEFAU
In general, the complete ideal ID associated to an antinef divisor D ∈ Div(X ′ ) satisfies
J (aλD −ε ) ⊇ ID but does not necessarily contain J (aλD ). However, if ID is nested in
between two consecutive multiplier ideals
J (aλ−ε ) ⊇ ID ! J (aλ )
then it must satisfy λ = λD .
Remark 5.1. One can also interpret this framework through the generalized version of logcanonical thresholds already introduced by Järviletho in [15]. Namely, the log-canonical
threshold with respect to any other ideal b ⊆ OX,O is defined as follows:
lctb (a) := inf{c ∈ Q>0 | J (ac ) 6⊃ b}
Notice that whenever ID is the complete ideal associated to an antinef divisor D ∈
Div(X ′ ), then λD = lctID (a).
Hyry-Järviletho [14, Lemma 11] proved that if D ∈ Div(X ′ ) is an antinef divisor then
GD is a contributing divisor for λD . In fact, the contributing divisors obtained in this
way satisfy some nice properties as we will see next.
Proposition 5.2. Let G be a contributing divisor associated to a jumping number λ. Let
D be the antinef closure of ⌊λF − Kπ ⌋ − G. Then GD 6 G.
P
Proof. Let D =
di Ei be the antinef closure of ⌊λF − Kπ ⌋ − G. Since ID is a nested
ideal in the chain of multiplier ideals, then we have
ki + 1 + d i
λ = λD = min
.
i
ei
Hence λei − ki 6 1 + di and equality holds if and only if i ∈ SD . In order to prove
GD 6 G we will show that Ei 66 G implies Ei 66 GD . Indeed, if Ei 66 G and Ei 6 GD then
⌊λei − ki ⌋ 6 di (just because ⌊λF − Kπ ⌋ − G 6 D by Lemma 2.3) and λei − ki − 1 = di
so we get a contradiction.
Proposition 5.3. Let λ = λD′ be a jumping number associated to an antinef divisor
D ′ ∈ Div(X ′ ). Let D be the antinef closure of ⌊λF − Kπ ⌋ − GD′ . Then we have D 6 D ′ ,
λD = λD′ , SD = SD′ and GD = GD′ .
Proof. Using the definition of antinef closure (see Lemma 2.3),
order to get D 6 D ′ we
P in
′
′
′
only need to prove that ⌊λF − Kπ ⌋ − GD′ 6 D . Set D = di Ei . By hypothesis
ki + 1 + d′i
λ = λD′ = min
i
ei
therefore we have ⌊λei − ki ⌋ 6 d′i if i 6∈ SD′ , whereas ⌊λei − ki ⌋ − 1 = d′i if i ∈ SD′ as
desired.
Notice then that we have J (aλ−ε ) ⊇ ID ⊇ ID′ so, given the fact that ID′ 6⊆ J (aλ ), we
get λD = λ. Now, the inclusion of divisors D 6 D ′ having the same minimum λD = λD′ ,
gives the inclusion of supports SD ⊇ SD′ and equivalently GD > GD′ . On the other hand,
MULTIPLIER IDEALS IN TWO-DIMENSIONAL LOCAL RINGS
29
taking G = GD′ in Proposition 5.2, we get the reverse inequality of divisors GD 6 GD′ so
we are done.
The main result of this section is that we can find a minimal contributing divisor among
all contributing divisors defining the same nested ideal.
Theorem 5.4. Let G be a contributing divisor associated to a jumping number λ. Let D
be the antinef closure of ⌊λF − Kπ ⌋ − G, which gives a nested ideal
J (aλ−ε ) ⊇ ID = π∗ OX ′ (⌈Kπ − λF ⌉ + G) ! J (aλ ).
Then we also have ID = π∗ OX ′ (⌈Kπ − λF ⌉ + GD ). Furthermore, GD is the minimal
contributing divisor associated to λ that defines the same ideal ID , that is:
· Any contribution G′ to λ defining ID = π∗ OX ′ (⌈Kπ − λF ⌉ + G′ ) must satisfy
GD 6 G′ .
· Any proper subdivisor G′ < GD defines an strictly included ideal
ID ! π∗ OX ′ (⌈Kπ − λF ⌉ + G′ ) .
Proof. Let D ′ be the antinef closure of ⌊λF − Kπ ⌋ − GD . We will see first that D = D ′
thus giving the desired equality of ideals
ID = π∗ OX ′ (⌈Kπ − λF ⌉ + G) = π∗ OX ′ (⌈Kπ − λF ⌉ + GD ) = ID′ .
In virtue of Proposition 5.2, we have GD 6 G so ⌊λF − Kπ ⌋ − G 6 ⌊λF − Kπ ⌋ − GD and
D 6 D ′ . The reverse inequality D > D ′ is a consequence of Proposition 5.3.
To show that GD is the minimal contributor to the jumping number λ that defines the
same ideal ID we will prove the following equivalent result:
Claim: Any contributor G′ to λ for which ID ⊇ π∗ OX ′ (⌈Kπ − λF ⌉ + G′ ) also satisfies
the reverse inclusion ID ⊆ π∗ OX ′ (⌈Kπ − λF ⌉ + G′ ) if and only if GD 6 G′ .
Proof of Claim: Suppose first that GD 6 G′ . Then ⌊λF − Kπ ⌋ − G′ 6 ⌊λF − Kπ ⌋ − GD
and hence D ′′ 6 D ′ = D, where D ′′ is the antinef closure of ⌊λF − Kπ ⌋ − G′ . Therefore
ID ⊆ ID′′ as wanted.
Assume now that GD 66 G′ and pick a component Ei 6 GD such that Ei 66 G′ . By
hypothesis ID ⊇ ID′′ and equivalently D 6 D ′′ but in fact D < D ′′ since
vi (D) = λei − ki − 1 < λei − ki = vi (⌊λF − Kπ ⌋ − G′ ) 6 vi (D ′′ ).
The result follows then from Proposition 3.3.
It turns out that critical divisors are also minimal in the above sense as we can see in
the following generalization of [14, Proposition 3].
Corollary 5.5. Let G be a contributing divisor associated to a jumping number λ. Let
D be the antinef closure of ⌊λF − Kπ ⌋ − G. Then G is a critical divisor if and only if
GD = G and ID and J (aλ ) do not admit strictly nested ideals between them defined by
contributors to λ.
30
M. ALBERICH-CARRAMIÑANA, J. ÀLVAREZ MONTANER, AND F. DACHS-CADEFAU
Proof. Assume first that GD = G. Then, by Theorem 5.4, any proper subdivisor 0 6 G′ <
G defines an ideal strictly included in ID ! π∗ OX ′ (⌈Kπ − λF ⌉ + G′ ) ⊇ J (aλ ). Since ID
and J (aλ ) do not admit strictly nested ideals between them coming from contributors,
we get π∗ OX ′ (⌈Kπ − λF ⌉ + G′ ) = J (aλ ) so G is a critical divisor.
Assume now that G is a critical divisor. By Proposition 5.2 we have GD 6 G. Both
divisors define the same ideal by Theorem 5.4 so they must be equal otherwise we would
have a contradiction with the fact that G is a critical divisor.
Finally we will see that there is no contributing divisor G′ associated to λ defining a
strictly nested ideal
ID ! π∗ OX ′ (⌈Kπ − λF ⌉ + G′ ) ! J (aλ ).
Assume that such G′ exists and let D ′ be the antinef closure of ⌊λF − Kπ ⌋ − G′ .
Then the inclusion of divisors D < D ′ having the same minimum λD = λD′ = λ implies
SD′ ⊆ SD and GD′ 6 GD . Since G = GD is minimal, applying Theorem 5.4, we must
have G = GD = GD′ 6 G′ contradicting the starting hypothesis of inclusion of ideals.
The minimal jumping divisor introduced in Section §4 fits nicely in this theory. Given
a jumping number λ of an m-primary ideal a ⊆ OX,O , let Dλ−ε be the antinef closure of
⌊(λ − ε)F − Kπ ⌋ for ε > 0 small enough. Then we have λ = λDλ−ε and the unique minimal
jumping divisor is Gλ = GDλ−ε .
In general, a divisor G ∈ Λ that contributes to the jumping number λ might not be
contained in Gλ . For minimal contributing divisors we have the following:
Proposition 5.6. Let λ be a jumping number of an ideal a ⊆ OX,O and Gλ be its associated minimal jumping divisor. Then GD 6 Gλ for any antinef divisor D ∈ Div(X ′ ) such
that λ = λD .
Proof. Let D ′ be the antinef closure of ⌊λF −Kπ ⌋−GD . By Proposition 5.3 we have GD =
GD′ and λ = λD = λD′ . Since the ideals J (aλ−ε ) ⊇ ID′ are nested, their corresponding
antinef divisors satisfy Dλ−ε 6 D ′ and they reach the same minimum λDλ−ε = λD′ = λ.
Hence, SD′ ⊆ SDλ−ε which implies GD = GD′ 6 Gλ as we wanted.
Corollary 5.7. Let λ be a jumping number of an ideal a ⊆ OX,O . Then we have G 6 Gλ
for any critical divisor G associated to λ.
The reduced sum of all critical divisors equals the jumping divisor Gλ for simple complete ideals (see [10, Thm. 2.3] for the smooth case). However this is no longer true in
general.
Example 5.8. Let X be a smooth surface and consider the m-primary ideal a ⊆ OX,O
whose dual graph is
E3
E4
E2
E1
E6
Vertex ordering
E5
3
6
2
1
Kπ
4
2
14
28
12
8
F
20
10
MULTIPLIER IDEALS IN TWO-DIMENSIONAL LOCAL RINGS
31
The multiplier ideals corresponding to the consecutive jumping numbers
7
14
6
4
10
5
8
15
7
5
11
5
7
<
3
4
are:
6
3
4
5
7
⊇
J (a )
J (a )
The minimal jumping divisor corresponding to λ = 43 is G 3 = E1 + E2 + E4 + E6 but
4
the only critical divisors are E4 and E6 . In particular
5
3
J (a 7 ) ! π∗ OX ′ (⌈Kπ − F ⌉ + E4 + E6 ).
4
It is worth pointing out that
3
π∗ OX ′ (−D 5 − E4 − E6 ) = π∗ OX ′ (−D 5 − G 3 ) = J (a 4 )
7
7
4
where D 5 is the antinef closure of ⌊ 57 F − Kπ ⌋. So minimality is not always achieved for
7
the divisor Gλ in Proposition 4.9.
In general, not every nested ideal between two consecutive multiplier ideals is given by
a contributing divisor. The following result identifies them precisely.
Proposition 5.9. Any nested ideal J (aλ−ε ) ⊇ ID′ ! J (aλ ) comes from a contributing
divisor G associated to λ, i.e. ID′ = π∗ OX ′ (⌈Kπ − λF ⌉ + G), if and only if D ′ = D where
D is the antinef closure of ⌊λF − Kπ ⌋ − G and in this case G = GD′ .
Proof. Let D ′ be the antinef closure of ⌊λF − Kπ ⌋ − G. By Proposition 5.3 we have
D 6 D ′ . On the other hand, Proposition 5.2 implies GD′ 6 G which gives
⌊λF − Kπ ⌋ − G 6 ⌊λF − Kπ ⌋ − GD′
and hence D ′ 6 D so we get the desired result. The reverse implication is straightforward.
Proposition 5.10. Let ID be the ideal associated to an antinef divisor D ∈ Λ. Then, ID is
a multiplier ideal for the ideal a ⊆ OX,O if and only if D is contained in the antinef closure
of ⌊(λD −ε)F −Kπ ⌋. If this is the case, D is also the antinef closure of ⌊λD F −Kπ ⌋−GD .
Proof. By definition, we have ⌊(λD − ε)F − Kπ ⌋ 6 D because J (aλD −ε ) ⊇ ID . We
also have ID 6⊆ J (aλD ) so the only possibility for ID of being a multiplier ideal is when
J (aλD −ε ) = ID so, applying Lemma 3.1, D must be contained in the antinef closure
of⌊(λD − ε)F − Kπ ⌋. The rest of the statement follows from Theorem 5.4.
References
[1] M. Alberich-Carramiñana, J.Àlvarez Montaner, F. Dachs-Cadefau and V. González-Alonso, Poincaré
series of multiplier ideals in two-dimensional local rings with rational singularities, preprint available
at arXiv:1412.3607. 17
[2] M. Alberich-Carramiñana, J.Àlvarez Montaner and G. Blanco, Effective computation of base points
of two-dimensional ideals, preprint. 18
32
M. ALBERICH-CARRAMIÑANA, J. ÀLVAREZ MONTANER, AND F. DACHS-CADEFAU
[3] M. Artin, Some numerical criteria for contractability of curves on algebraic surfaces, Amer. J. Math.
84 (1962), 485–496. 17
[4] M. Artin, On isolated rational singularities of surfaces, Amer. J. Math. 88 (1966), 129–136. 3, 17
[5] E. Casas-Alvero, Singularities of plane curves, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Series, 276, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. 2, 7
[6] L. Ein, R. Lazarsfeld, K. Smith and D. Varolin, Jumping coefficients of multiplier ideals, Duke
Math. J. 123 (2004), 469–506. 9
[7] F. Enriques and O. Chisini, Lezioni sulla teoria geometrica delle equazioni e delle funzioni algebriche,
N. Zanichelli, Bologna, (1915). 7
[8] C. Favre and M. Jonsson, The valuative tree, Lect. Notes Math.,1853 (2004). Springer-Verlag, Berlin,
xiv+234 pp. 1, 23
[9] C. Favre and M. Jonsson, Valuations and multiplier ideals, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 18 (2005), 655–684.
1
[10] C. Galindo and F. Monserrat, The Poincaré series of multiplier ideals of a simple complete ideal in
a local ring of a smooth surface, Adv. Math. 225 (2010), 1046–1068. 30
[11] C. Galindo, F. Hernando and F. Monserrat, The log-canonical threshold of a plane curve, Preprint
available at arXiv:1211.6274. 2
[12] D. Grayson and M. Stillman, Macaulay 2. Available at: http://www.math.uiuc.edu/Macaulay2. 17
[13] G.-M. Greuel, G. Pfister, and H. Schönemann, Singular 2.0.5 A Computer Algebra System
for Polynomial Computations. Centre for Computer Algebra, University of Kaiserslautern (2003).
http://www.singular.uni-kl.de. 18
[14] E. Hyry and T. Järviletho, Jumping numbers and ordered tree structures on the dual graph,
Manuscripta Math. 136 (2011), 411–437. 2, 3, 27, 28, 29
[15] T. Järviletho, Jumping numbers of a simple complete ideal in a two-dimensional regular local ring,
Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 214 (2011), no. 1009, viii+78 pp. 2, 28
[16] T. Kuwata, On log canonical thresholds of reducible plane curves, Amer. J. Math. 121 (1999),
701–721. 2
[17] H. Laufer, On rational singularities, Amer. J. Math. 94 (1972), 597–608. 7
[18] R. Lazarsfeld, Positivity in algebraic geometry II, volume 49, (2004), Springer-Verlag, xviii+385. 8
[19] J. Lipman, Rational singularities, with applications to algebraic surfaces and unique factorization,
Inst. Hautes tudes Sci. Publ. Math. 36 (1969) 195–279. 2, 3, 6, 22
[20] J. Lipman and K. I. Watanabe, Integrally closed ideals in two-dimensional regular local rings are
multiplier ideals, Math. Res. Lett. 10 (2003) 423–434. 1, 4, 6, 7
[21] D. Naie, Jumping numbers of a unibranch curve on a smooth surface, Manuscripta Math. 128 (2009),
33–49. 2
[22] A. J. Reguera, Curves and proximity on rational surface singularities, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 122
(1997) 107–126. 2, 3, 7
[23] K. E. Smith and H. Thompson, Irrelevant exceptional divisors for curves on a smooth surface. in:
Algebra, geometry and their interactions, Contemp. Math. 448 (2007), 245–254. 2, 9
[24] K. Tucker, Integrally closed ideals on log terminal surfaces are multiplier ideals, Math. Res. Lett. 16
(2009), 903–908. 1, 6, 8
[25] K. Tucker, Jumping numbers on algebraic surfaces with rational singularities, Trans. Amer. Math.
Soc. 362 (2010), 3223–3241. 2, 3, 8, 9, 10, 18, 22, 27
[26] W. Veys, Determination of the poles of the topological zeta function for curves, Manuscripta Math.
87 (1995), 435–448. 26
Departament de Matemàtiques, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Av. Diagonal
647, Barcelona 08028, Spain
E-mail address: [email protected], [email protected]
MULTIPLIER IDEALS IN TWO-DIMENSIONAL LOCAL RINGS
33
KU Leuven, Department of Mathematics, Celestijnenlaan 200B box 2400, BE-3001 Leuven, Belgium
E-mail address: [email protected]
| 0math.AC
|
arXiv:1801.04757v1 [cs.IT] 15 Jan 2018
On the Distribution of Random Geometric Graphs
Mihai-Alin Badiu
Justin P. Coon
Department of Electronic Systems
Aalborg University
Fredrik Bajers Vej 7, 9220 Aalborg Øst, Denmark
Email: [email protected]
Department of Engineering Science
University of Oxford
Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PJ, UK
Email: [email protected]
Abstract—Random geometric graphs (RGGs) are commonly
used to model networked systems that depend on the underlying
spatial embedding. We concern ourselves with the probability
distribution of an RGG, which is crucial for studying its random
topology, properties (e.g., connectedness), or Shannon entropy as
a measure of the graph’s topological uncertainty (or information
content). Moreover, the distribution is also relevant for determining average network performance or designing protocols.
However, a major impediment in deducing the graph distribution
is that it requires the joint probability distribution of the
n(n − 1)/2 distances between n nodes randomly distributed in
a bounded domain. As no such result exists in the literature, we
make progress by obtaining the joint distribution of the distances
between three nodes confined in a disk in R2 . This enables the
calculation of the probability distribution and entropy of a threenode graph. For arbitrary n, we derive a series of upper bounds
on the graph entropy; in particular, the bound involving the
entropy of a three-node graph is tighter than the existing bound
which assumes distances are independent. Finally, we provide
numerical results on graph connectedness and the tightness of
the derived entropy bounds.
I. I NTRODUCTION
Uncertainty is pervasive in modern wireless networks. The
sources of this uncertainty range from the humans that interact
with the networks and the locations of the nodes in space
down to the transmission protocols and the underlying scattering processes that affect signal propagation. To date, some
progress has been made towards characterizing the structural
uncertainty of wireless networks by modeling these networks
as random geometric graphs (RGGs) where the probability
that two particular nodes are connected is a function of the
distance between them [1]–[3]. RGGs with probabilistic pair
connection functions are known in the mathematics community as soft RGGs [4]. Work on these graphs has mostly
been focused on analyzing their percolation (in an infinite
domain) or connectivity (in a finite domain) properties [5]–
[7]. In the case of finite (but dense) graphs, this sort of
investigation typically amounts to obtaining an understanding
of the probability that a single isolated node exists.
Ideally, one would like to obtain information about the
complete distribution of the graphs in the ensemble. This
information would enable us to study not only connectivity,
but also important features such as topological structure and
complexity through the lens of graph entropy [8]. Applications
of entropy-based methods to the study of networked systems
are abundant and include problems related to molecular struc-
ture classification [9], social networks [10], [11], data compression [12], and quantum entanglement [13], [14]. Graph
entropy has also been invoked in the study of communication
networks to quantify node and route stability [15] with the
aim of improving link prediction [16] and routing protocols [17], [18]. Topological uncertainty in dynamic mobile ad
hoc networks was investigated in [19] from a network layer
perspective, and [20] treated self-organisation in networks
using a basic graph entropy framework. More recently, an
analytical approach for studying topological uncertainty in
wireless networks was proposed in [21]–[23].
In this paper, we study the probability distribution of the
RGG formed by n nodes randomly distributed in a bounded
domain. The joint distribution of all n(n − 1)/2 inter-node
distances is greatly relevant for the distribution of the RGG.
Finding distance distributions is a very challenging task in
probabilistic geometry, as it often leads to intractable definite
integrals; existing literature focuses on the distance between
two nodes or the distances between a node and its neighbours
(e.g., see [24]–[27]). We derive the joint distribution of the
inter-node distances in closed-form, for n = 3 nodes confined
in a disk in R2 ; to our knowledge, this is the first time such a
result is obtained. We avoid intractable integrations by using
a conditioning technique and expect that the same approach
could be used for larger n. Also, for arbitrary n, we derive a
series of upper bounds on the graph entropy; in particular,
the bound involving the entropy of a three-node graph is
tighter than the existing bound which assumes distances are
independent. Finally, we provide numerical results on graph
connectedness and the tightness of the derived entropy bounds.
II. R ANDOM G EOMETRIC G RAPH
A. Model
Consider a set Vn = {1, . . . , n} of n nodes that are
randomly located in a space K ⊂ Rd of finite volume and
diameter D := supu,v∈K ku−vk. We assume that the locations
{Zi }i∈Vn of the nodes are independently and uniformly distributed in K. The existence of an (undirected) edge between
nodes i and j depends on the Euclidean distance between the
two nodes and is indicated by the binary random variable
Xij being one. Specifically, given the node locations, the
variables {Xij } are independent and each edge (i, j) exists
with probability
P (Xij = 1|zi , zj ) = p(kzi − zj k),
(1)
where p : [0, ∞) → [0, 1] is the pair connection function. For
example, in the hard disk model, p(·) is an indicator function
that equals one when its argument is less than r0 and zero
otherwise, where r0 denotes the maximum connection range.
We define the binary vector Xn to include all edge variables,
i.e., Xn = (Xij )i<j . The random geometric graph Gn :=
G(Vn , En ) with edge set En = {(i, j) | Xij = 1} is distributed
in the set of all n(n − 1)/2 possible graphs.
B. Probability Distribution and Entropy
The distribution of Gn is determined by both the distribution
of locations {Zi }i∈Vn and the probabilistic connection model
specified by p(·). The graph Gn is uniquely determined by
Xn , which has a multivariate Bernoulli distribution. Therefore,
we study the pmf fXn (xn ) := P (Xn = xn ), for each
xn ∈ {0, 1}n(n−1)/2. Since the conditional probability of
edge existence depends on distance, it is more convenient to
work with inter-node distances instead of node locations. Let
Rn := (Rij )i<j denote the random vector collecting the pair
distances Rij := kZi − Zj k, and let fRn : [0, D]n(n−1)/2 →
[0, ∞) be its pdf. We now write
fXn (xn )
Z
n
Y
1−x
pxij (rij ) [1 − p(rij )] ij drij . (2)
fRn (rn )
=
R
i,j=1
i<j
where the integration domain is R = [0, D]n(n−1)/2 . The
distribution of Xn is symmetric, since the node locations are
identically distributed and the pair connection function is the
same for all edges. The topological uncertainty (or information
content) of Gn can be quantified by the Shannon entropy, i.e.,
H(Gn ) = H(Xn )
=−
X
fXn (xn ) log fXn (xn ).
(3)
xn ∈{0,1}n(n−1)/2
It is clear from (2) that the joint pdf fRn of inter-node
distances is highly important for the graph distribution and
its entropy. For n = 2, the sought pdf reduces to the pdf of
the distance between two nodes, which has been extensively
studied for various shapes of the embedding space K (e.g.,
see [24]–[27]). Obtaining the joint pdf analytically for n > 2
is very challenging and no such results have been reported
previously. In the next section, we make progress by obtaining
the joint pdf for n = 3 in closed-form by using a conditioning
technique. This enables the calculation of the pmf (2) and
entropy (3) for n = 3, which then can be used to bound the
graph entropy when n > 3, as shown in Sec. IV.
III. J OINT PDF OF I NTER -N ODE D ISTANCES
FOR
n=3
We consider n = 3 and K is a disk of diameter D in R2 .
Even though the locations of the three nodes are independently
and uniformly distributed, determining the joint pdf of the
three distances by direct integration is very difficult. For
example, one could attempt to transform the Cartesian coordinates (i.e., six variables) to other coordinates that include
the three distances, apply the transformation theorem and
integrate out the redundant coordinates. However, this leads
to complicated definite integrals, because triangle inequalities
and the condition that the points have to be inside the circle
need to be ensured.
Computing integrals over complicated regions is often required in probabilistic geometry. Crofton’s technique [28] has
proven to simplify such evaluations in many problems, such
as finding the distribution of the distance between two random
points [29]. The work [30] shows that Crofton’s method is essentially equivalent to the technique of computing expectations
by conditioning. We use the latter in the following.
Our approach is to compute the joint pdf conditioned on an
additional (suitably chosen) random variable, which is easier
than the original problem. Then, we obtain the desired joint
pdf by taking the expectation of the conditional pdf over the
density of the additional variable. We expect that this approach
is also useful for n > 3.
Before presenting the result, we fix some notation. For a
triangle with side lengths r12 , r13 and r23 , let d be the diameter
of its circumscribed circle, i.e.,
2r12 r13 r23
,
(4)
d= p
Q(r12 , r13 , r23 )
2 2
2 2
2 2
4
where Q(r12 , r13 , r23 ) = 2r12
r13 + 2r12
r23 + 2r13
r23 − r12
−
4
4
r13
− r23
; note that Q(r12 , r13 , r23 ) > 0 is equivalent to r12 ,
r13 , r23 satisfying the triangle inequalities. We denote the
largest side length by r̄ = max(r12 , r13 , r23 ). Let us also
define
the function ϕ : [0, 1] → R, ϕ(x) = arccos(x) −
√
x 1 − x2 .
Proposition 1: Assume three points are independently and
uniformly distributed inside a circle of diameter D and let
R12 , R13 and R23 be the side lengths of the random triangle
determined by the points. Then, for all r12 , r13 , r23 ∈ R+
such that Q(r12 , r13 , r23 ) > 0 and r̄ ≤ D, the joint pdf of the
side lengths is given by eq. (5) at the top of the next page.
The pdf depends on whether the realized triangle is obtuse or
acute, and whether the diameter (4) of its circumscribed circle
is larger or smaller than D.
Proof: An outline of the proof is given in the appendix.
IV. B OUNDING
G RAPH E NTROPY
In [21], [22], the upper-bound H(Gn ) ≤ n2 H(G2 ) is
obtained for any n ≥ 2 by assuming that {Xij } are independent (or, equivalently, that the pair distances {Rij }
are independent). While such an upper bound is simple and
amenable to further analysis, its tightness might not always be
sufficient. We set out to find tighter upper bounds by trying
THE
nP h
64d
2
4
i<j ϕ
π D n
h
64d P
i<j ϕ
fR3 (r12 , r13 , r23 ) = π2 D4
r̄
128d
π2 D4 ϕ D ,
0,
rij
D
rij
D
−
−
d2
D2 ϕ
2
d
D2 ϕ
i
rij
d i
rij
d
−
−
π
2
π
2
1−
1−
to preserve the dependency between pair distances. First, we
establish the following result.
Proposition 2: For any m, n ∈ Z such that n > m ≥ 2, the
entropies of Gn and Gm are related by
S∈S
where XS := (Xij )ij∈S . Each term in the r.h.s. of (7) is the
entropy of a graph with m nodes; by invoking the system’s
symmetry, all terms are equal to H(Gm ), such that
n
H(Gn ) ≤
m
n−2 H(Gm ),
m−2
(8)
and (6) follows immediately.
The following corollary gives a series of tighter and tighter
upper bounds on H(Gn ), for all n ≥ 2.
Corollary 1: The normalized (i.e., per edge) entropy decreases with the number of nodes, i.e.,
H(G3 )
H(Gn−1 )
H(Gn )
≤
≤ ... ≤
≤ H(G2 ).
n
n−1
3
2
2
d
D2
,
r̄
d
o
,
if 2r̄2 >
2
if 2r̄ ≤
2
if 2r̄ >
if 2r̄2 ≤
P
i<j
2
rij
,
2
i<j rij ,
P
r2 ,
Pi<j ij
2
i<j rij ,
P
d ≤ D,
d ≤ D,
d > D,
d > D.
(5)
0.8
(6)
Proof: The entropy of Gn is given by the entropy of the
n
2 binary variables in Xn , see (3). Our intention is to relate
H(Gn ) to the entropy of RGGs with smaller number
of nodes.
n
Specifically, for m < n, we consider all the m
subsets of Vn
that have m nodes.
Let Nm,k ⊂ Vn be the kth such subset,
n
k = 1, . . . , m
. The set of pair indices corresponding to Nm,k
is denoted by Sk = {ij | i, j ∈ Nm,k , i < j}. We further
define the set S = {S1 , . . . , S( n ) } collecting all the sets of
m
pair indices. In this construction,
each pair index ij with i, j ∈
n−2
Vn appears in m−2
subsets of S. According to Shearer’s
inequality, which is a generalization of the subadditivity of
joint entropy [31], [32], we have
1 X
H(XS ),
(7)
H(Xn ) ≤ n−2
m−2
2
2
d
2D
2ϕ
1
(9)
Proof: We immediately obtain (9) by successively applying (6) for consecutive integers.
V. N UMERICAL E XPERIMENTS
In the following we assume that the random nodes are
confined in a disk with diameter D = 1; any two nodes are
connected by an edge if and only if the distance between them
is less than r0 .
We first take an example from ad-hoc communications, where it is relevant to know conditions under
which any two nodes of the network can communicate.
Probability
H(Gn )
H(Gm )
≤
.
n(n − 1)
m(m − 1)
d2
+
D2 o
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Fig. 1. Probability of connectedness and probability of completeness for an
RGG with n = 3 nodes and maximum connection range r0 ; the three nodes
are randomly located inside a circle with diameter one.
If multi-hop communication is possible, this is equivalent to the requirement that the graph be connected; otherwise, the graph needs to be complete. We consider
a three-node graph and evaluate P (G3 is connected) =
fX3 (0, 1, 1) + fX3 (1, 0, 1) + fX3 (1, 1, 0) + fX3 (1, 1, 1) and
P (G3 is complete) = fX3 (1, 1, 1) as functions of r0 (which
can be thought of as being monotonically related to the transmit power). We compute the pmf (2) by using the derived joint
pdf (5) and numerical integration. The results in Fig. 1 show
that two-hop relaying significantly improves the probability
that any two of the three nodes can communicate.
We now study the entropy bounds derived in Sec. IV. We
consider n = 5 nodes and compute H(G5 ) using Monte
Carlo simulation. From (9), we have H(G5 ) ≤ 10
3 H(G3 ) ≤
10H(G2 ). We use the derived joint pdf (5) to compute the
pmf (2), which then gives H(G3 ). We similarly obtain H(G2 )
based on the pdf of the distance between two points inside a
circle [24]. Fig. 2 shows that H(G5 ) approaches zero when
r0 → 0 or r0 → D (i.e., when the RGG becomes deterministically empty or complete, respectively). The entropy is
significant at intermediate values of r0 and always less than
10 bits, which is the entropy of a five-node graph whose 10
potential edges exist independently with probability 0.5. We
can also observe that the bound based on H(G3 ) provides
an improvement over the one obtained by assuming the 10
inter-node distances are independent.
10
• Aj
8
Entropy (bits)
θ̄ij
6
Ai •
4
Θi
Θij
2
O
.
•
Ak
0
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Fig. 2. Entropy of an RGG with n = 5 nodes and maximum connection
range r0 , and upper bounds; the five nodes are randomly located inside a
circle with diameter one.
VI. C ONCLUSION
In this paper, we studied the distribution of a random
geometric graph and its entropy. The distribution provides
insights into properties of the random graph, such as topological structure or connectivity, while entropy is useful for
understanding topological complexity. We showed that the
normalized (per edge) entropy decreases with the number of
nodes. This result gave a series of upper bounds on entropy,
each bound involving the entropy of a graph with smaller
number of nodes. We pointed out the importance of the
joint distribution of pair distances in determining the graph’s
distribution and its entropy, and the lack of such results in the
literature. We progressed by deriving the joint distribution of
distances between three nodes confined in a disk, and expect
that the approach we used could be applied for larger number
of nodes.
A PPENDIX
Let O be the center of the disk K of diameter D. We denote
by Si the minimum diameter of a disk centred at O that
includes the ith point and define S̄ = max(S1 , S2 , S3 ). We
write
Z D
fR3 |S̄ (r12 , r13 , r23 | s)fS̄ (s) ds.
fR3 (r12 , r13 , r23 ) =
0
(10)
Conditioning on S̄ is very convenient because, in the computation of fR3 |S̄ , one of the three points is on the circle
Cs of center O and diameter s, while the other two points
are inside Cs ; this is a great simplification. The density fS̄ is
obtained as follows: we have P (Si ≤ s) = s2 /D2 , for each
s ∈ [0, D]; therefore, P (S̄ ≤ s) = s6 /D6 , which gives the
pdf fS̄ (s) = 6s5 /D6 .
To compute fR3 |S̄ , we study the “number of ways” in
which one can fit a triangle of side-lengths r12 , r13 and r23
inside Cs when one of the triangle’s vertices is fixed on the
Fig. 3. Illustration of the circle Cs of center O and diameter s; the point Ai
is on the circle, while Aj and Ak are inside Cs .
circle. The side lengths must satisfy the triangle inequalities,
2 2
2 2
r23 +
which is equivalent to Q(r12 , r13 , r23 ) := 2r12
r13 + 2r12
2 2
4
4
4
2r13 r23 − r12 − r13 − r23 > 0. It is also required that
r̄ := max(r12 , r13 , r23 ) ≤ s.
In Fig. 3, point Ai represents node i. Assuming Ai is on
Cs we have
i
(r12 , r13 , r23 )
fR
3
= fRi jk |Rij ,Rik (rjk |rij , rik )fRi ij (rij )fRi ik (rik )
(11)
where superscript i indicates conditioning on node i being
on Cs , and {i, j, k} ≡ {1, 2, 3}. For each j 6= i, the pdf of
Rij = |Ai Aj | is [24]
r
8rij
ij
fRi ij (rij ) =
, rij ∈ [0, s].
(12)
arccos
πs2
s
2
2
To obtain fRi jk |Rij ,Rik , we use the law of cosines Rjk
= Rij
+
2
Rik
− 2Rij Rik cos Θi , with Θi := ∠Aj Ai Ak . For each j 6=
i, we further define Θij = ∠OAi Aj; we have Θij |Rij ∼
r
U(−θ̄ij , θ̄ij )), with θ̄ij = arccos sij < π/2. Since Θi =
Θij − Θik (i.e., the difference between two independent and
uniformly distributed variables), it follows that Θi |Rij , Rik
has a trapezoidal distribution with pdf
i
fΘ
(θi |rij , rik )
i |Rij ,Rik
1
2 max(θ̄ij ,θ̄ik ) , if 0 ≤ |θi | ≤ |θ̄ij − θ̄ik |,
= θ̄ij 4+θ̄θ̄ikθ̄−|θi | , if |θ̄ij − θ̄ik | ≤ |θi | < θ̄ij + θ̄ik ,
ij ik
0,
if θ̄ij + θ̄ik ≤ |θi | < π.
Now, we make the transformation Y = cos Θi and obtain the pdf of Y from its cdf, which is computed as
FYi |Rij ,Rik (y|rij , rik ) = 1 − P (cos Θi > y). Then, we use
the law of cosines and transformation theorem to obtain
fRi jk |Rij ,Rik . We distinguish between several cases depending
on the diameter d of the circumscribed circle (4). When
d > s, the only way in which the triangle can be inside Cs
while node i is on Cs is when the triangle is obtuse (i.e.,
2
2
2
2r̄2 > r12
+ r13
+ r23
) and its largest side length r̄ is either
rij or rik . Using (12) in (11), we obtain
i
(r12 , r13 , r23 )
fR
3
32d
π2 s4 (θ̄ij + θ̄ik − θi ), if d ≤ s,
r̄
= π64d
,
if d > s,
2 s4 arccos s
0,
else,
2r̄2 >
P
i<j
2
rij
,
(13)
for all r12 , r13 , r23 ∈ R+ that satisfy Q(r12 , r13 , r23 ) > 0 and
r̄ ≤ s. Since each node can be
circle with probability
P on the
i
1/3, it follows that fR3 |S̄ = 3i=1 fR
/3,
which gives
3
fR3 |S̄ (r12 , r13 , r23 |s)
"
P
64d
arccos
2 s4
3π
i<j
= 128d arccos r̄ ,
3π 2 s4
s
0,
rij
s
−
π
2
#
, if d ≤ s,
if d > s, 2r̄2 >
P
i<j
else.
2
rij
,
(14)
We have used that θ1 + θ2 + θ3 = π and when d > s the node
corresponding to the obtuse angle cannot be on Cs .
Finally, by plugging (14) into (10), we calculate the integral
by distinguishing between the cases d ≤ D and d > D, and
arrive at the closed-form expression (5).
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work was supported by Independent Research Fund
Denmark grant number DFF–5054-00212 and by EPSRC grant
number EP/N002350/1 (“Spatially Embedded Networks”).
The research was carried out during a visit to University of
Oxford, and M.-A Badiu would like to thank the Communications Research Group for the hospitality.
R EFERENCES
[1] M. Franceschetti and R. Meester, Random Networks for Communication:
From Statistical Physics to Information Systems, ser. Cambridge Series
in Statistical and Probabilistic Mathematics.
Cambridge University
Press, 2008.
[2] F. Baccelli and B. Błlaszczyszyn, “Stochastic geometry and wireless
networks: Volume II applications,” Found. Trends Netw., vol. 4, no. 1-2,
pp. 1–312, Jan. 2009.
[3] C. P. Dettmann and O. Georgiou, “Random geometric graphs with
general connection functions,” Physical Review E, vol. 93, no. 3, p.
032313, 2016.
[4] M. D. Penrose, “Connectivity of soft random geometric graphs,” The
Annals of Applied Probability, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 986–1028, 2016.
[5] ——, “On a continuum percolation model,” Advances in applied probability, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 536–556, 1991.
[6] R. Meester and R. Roy, Continuum percolation. Cambridge University
Press, 1996, vol. 119.
[7] J. Coon, C. P. Dettmann, and O. Georgiou, “Full connectivity: corners,
edges and faces,” Journal of Statistical Physics, vol. 147, no. 4, pp.
758–778, 2012.
[8] G. Simonyi, “Graph entropy: a survey,” Combinatorial Optimization,
vol. 20, pp. 399–441, 1995.
[9] D. Bonchev, Information theoretic indices for characterization of chemical structures. Research Studies Press, 1983, no. 5.
[10] M. G. Everett, “Role similarity and complexity in social networks,”
Social Networks, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 353–359, 1985.
[11] M. Dehmer and A. Mowshowitz, “A history of graph entropy measures,”
Information Sciences, vol. 181, no. 1, pp. 57–78, 2011.
[12] Y. Choi and W. Szpankowski, “Compression of graphical structures:
Fundamental limits, algorithms, and experiments,” vol. 58, no. 2, pp.
620–638, 2012.
[13] N. de Beaudrap, V. Giovannetti, S. Severini, and R. Wilson, “Interpreting
the von Neumann entropy of graph Laplacians, and coentropic graphs,”
A Panorama of Mathematics: Pure and Applied, vol. 658, p. 227, 2016.
[14] D. E. Simmons, J. P. Coon, and A. Datta, “Symmetric Laplacians,
quantum density matrices and their von Neumann entropy,” Linear
Algebra and its Applications, vol. 532, pp. 534–549, nov 2017.
[15] J. L. Guo, W. Wu, and S. B. Xu, “Study on route stability based on
the metrics of local topology transformation entropy in mobile ad hoc
networks,” Advanced Engineering Forum, vol. 1, pp. 288–292, sep 2011.
[16] M.-H. Zayani, “Link prediction in dynamic and human-centered mobile
wireless networks,” Ph.D. dissertation, 2012.
[17] B. An and S. Papavassiliou, “An entropy-based model for supporting
and evaluating route stability in mobile ad hoc wireless networks,” IEEE
Communications Letters, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 328–330, aug 2002.
[18] M. Boushaba, A. Hafid, and M. Gendreau, “Node stability-based routing
in wireless mesh networks,” Journal of Network and Computer Applications, vol. 93, pp. 1–12, 2017.
[19] R. Timo, K. Blackmore, and L. Hanlen, “On entropy measures for
dynamic network topologies: Limits to MANET,” in Communications
Theory Workshop, 2005. Proceedings. 6th Australian. IEEE, 2005, pp.
95–101.
[20] J. Lu, F. Valois, M. Dohler, and D. Barthel, “Quantifying organization
by means of entropy,” IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 12, no. 3, pp.
185–187, mar 2008.
[21] J. P. Coon, “Topological uncertainty in wireless networks,” in 2016 IEEE
Global Communications Conference, GLOBECOM 2016, Washington,
DC, USA, December 4-8, 2016. IEEE, 2016, pp. 1–6.
[22] J. P. Coon, C. P. Dettmann, and O. Georgiou, “Entropy of Spatial
Network Ensembles,” ArXiv e-prints, Jul. 2017.
[23] A. Cika, J. P. Coon, and S. Kim, “Effects of directivity on wireless network complexity,” in 2017 15th International Symposium on Modeling
and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc, and Wireless Networks (WiOpt).
IEEE, May 2017, pp. 1–7.
[24] A. M. Mathai, An Introduction to Geometrical Probability, ser. Statistical
Distributions and Models with Applications.
Newark: Gordon and
Breach, 1999.
[25] S. Srinivasa and M. Haenggi, “Distance distributions in finite uniformly
random networks: Theory and applications,” IEEE Trans. Vehicular
Technology, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 940–949, 2010.
[26] Z. Khalid and S. Durrani, “Distance distributions in regular polygons,”
IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 2363–
2368, Jun 2013.
[27] R. Pure and S. Durrani, “Computing exact closed-form distance distributions in arbitrarily shaped polygons with arbitrary reference points,”
The Mathematica Journal, vol. 17, pp. 1–27, 2015.
[28] H. Solomon, Geometric Probability. Society for Industrial and Applied
Mathematics, 1978.
[29] V. S. Alagar, “The distribution of the distance between random points,”
Journal of Applied Probability, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 558–566, 1976.
[30] B. Eisenberg and R. Sullivan, “Crofton’s differential equation,” The
American Mathematical Monthly, vol. 107, pp. 129–139, 2000.
[31] F. Chung, R. Graham, P. Frankl, and J. Shearer, “Some intersection
theorems for ordered sets and graphs,” Journal of Combinatorial Theory,
Series A, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 23 – 37, 1986.
[32] M. Yanagida and Y. Horibe, “A dropping proof of an entropy inequality,”
Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 840 – 842, 2008.
| 7cs.IT
|
On Active and Passive Testing
Noga Alon∗
Rani Hod†
Amit Weinstein‡
arXiv:1307.7364v2 [cs.DS] 15 Nov 2015
February 27, 2018
Abstract
Given a property of Boolean functions, what is the minimum number of queries required
to determine with high probability if an input function satisfies this property or is “far” from
satisfying it? This is a fundamental question in Property Testing, where traditionally the testing
algorithm is allowed to pick its queries among the entire set of inputs. Balcan, Blais, Blum and
Yang have recently suggested to restrict the tester to take its queries from a smaller random
subset of polynomial size of the inputs. This model is called active testing, and in the extreme
case when the size of the set we can query from is exactly the number of queries performed it
is known as passive testing.
We prove that passive or active testing of k-linear functions (that is, sums of k variables
among n over Z2 ) requires Θ(k log n) queries, assuming k is not too large. This extends the case
k = 1, (that is, dictator functions), analyzed by Balcan et. al.
We also consider other classes of functions including low degree polynomials, juntas, and
partially symmetric functions. Our methods combine algebraic, combinatorial, and probabilistic
techniques, including the Talagrand concentration inequality and the Erdős–Rado theorem on
∆-systems.
1
Introduction
Property testing considers the following general problem: given a property P, identify the minimum
number of queries required to determine with high probability whether an input object has the
property P or whether it is “far” from P. This question was first formalized by Rubinfeld and
Sudan [24] in the context of Boolean functions.
Definition 1 ([24]). Let P be a family of Boolean functions and let ǫ > 0. A q-query ǫ-tester for P
is a randomized algorithm that queries an unknown function f : Zn2 → Z2 on q inputs of its choice
and
(i) Accepts with probability at least 2/3 when f ∈ P;
(ii) Rejects with probability at least 2/3 when f is ǫ-far from P, where f is ǫ-far from P if
dist(f, g) := |{x ∈ Zn2 | f (x) 6= g(x)}| ≥ ǫ2n holds for every g ∈ P.
∗
Sackler School of Mathematics and Blavatnik School of Computer Science, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978,
Israel and School of Mathematics, Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, NJ 08540. Email: [email protected].
Research supported in part by BSF grant 2012/107, by ISF grant 620/13, by the Israeli I-Core program and by the
Fund for Mathematics.
†
School of Mathematics, Georgia Tech, 686 Cherry st, Atlanta, GA 30332. E-mail: [email protected].
‡
Blavatnik School of Computer Science, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel. Email: [email protected].
Research supported in part by the Israeli I-Core program.
1
We denote the minimal q such that a q-query ǫ-tester for P exists by Qǫ (P).
The main line of research in many works on property testing is to characterize Qǫ (P) for various
properties P. An interesting distinction is identifying properties for which Qǫ (P) is constant (i.e.,
independent of n). For instance, linearity can be tested in a constant number of queries [13]; more
generally, testing if a Boolean function is a polynomial of constant degree can be performed with
a constant number of queries [1, 5, 7, 24]. Testing whether a function depends only on a constant
number of its input variables (that is, if a function is a junta) can also be done with a constant
number of queries [8, 9, 19].
In the definition above the algorithm can pick its q queries in the entire set Zn2 . Balcan, Blais,
Blum, and Yang [3] suggested to restrict the tester to take its queries from a smaller, typically
random, subset U ⊆ Zn2 . This model is called active testing, in resemblance of active learning (see,
e.g., [16]). Active testing gets more difficult as the size of U decreases, and the extreme case is
when U is a set of q random points (so the algorithm actually has no choice). This is known as
passive testing, or testing from random examples1 , and was studied in [20, 21]. Formally, the next
definition from [3] extends Definition 1 to active and passive testers.
Definition 2. Let P be a family of Boolean functions and let ǫ > 0. A u-sample q-query ǫ-tester
for P is a randomized algorithm that, given a subset U ⊆ Zn2 of size |U | = u, drawn uniformly at
random, queries an unknown function f : Zn2 → Z2 on q inputs from U and
(i) Accepts with probability at least 2/3 when f ∈ P;
(ii) Rejects with probability at least 2/3 when f is ǫ-far from P.
The set U may be chosen with or without repetitions. For our purpose these two options will
be equivalent, as in the parameters considered here the probability of a repetition is negligible.
We denote by Qaǫ (P, u) the minimal q such that a u-sample q-query ǫ-tester for P exists (∞ if
u queries do not suffice), and by Qpǫ (P) the minimal q such that a q-sample q-query ǫ-tester (i.e.,
a passive ǫ-tester) for P exists.
We are usually interested in poly (n)-sample testers; for simplicity, we omit the sample size u
from our notation when this is the case.
The following inequality from [3] shows the relation between the query complexity of the different
testing models.
Proposition 3 ([3, Theorem A.4.]). For every property P and for every ǫ > 0, Qǫ (P) ≤ Qaǫ (P) ≤
Qpǫ (P).
To provide a simple upper bound on the query complexity of passive testing, we refer to the
more difficult problem of proper passive learning. The most common model of passive learning is
PAC-learning, introduced by Valiant [27].
Definition 4. Let P be a family of Boolean functions. A q-query ǫ-learning algorithm for P is
a randomized algorithm that, given q random queries from an unknown function f ∈ P, outputs
a Boolean function g : Zn2 → Z2 such that g is ǫ-close to f with probability at least 2/3 (the
underlying probability space is the random queries and the coin tosses of the algorithm). The
algorithm is called proper if it always returns some g ∈ P. We denote the minimal q such that a
proper q-query ǫ-learning algorithm for P exists by Qℓǫ (P).
1
Although the examples could be drawn from a general probability distribution, in this work we focus on the
uniform distribution.
2
The number of queries needed to properly learn a Boolean function essentially bounds from
above the number of queries needed to test it; given the output of a proper learning algorithm, it
remains to verify that the input function is indeed close to it. More formally, we have the following
proposition.
Proposition 5 ([20, Proposition 3.1.1]). For every property P and for every ǫ > 0, Qpǫ (P) ≤
Qℓǫ/2 (P) + O (1/ǫ).
This proposition is often used together with the following known upper bound.
Fact 6. For every family of Boolean functions P, Qℓǫ (P) = O( 1ǫ log |P|).
For the sake of simplicity, we focus on a constant ǫ (say, ǫ = 0.001) throughout the rest of this
paper. This allows us to drop the subscript ǫ from our notation when possible (e.g., we write Q (P)
instead of Qǫ (P)).
1.1
Our results
In [3] it was shown that active testing of dictator functions (i.e., functions that only depend on
a single input variable) requires Θ (log n) queries. Our first result extends this to the family of
k-linear functions; that is, the family of sums of k variables over Z2 . Let Link denote this family.
Theorem 7. Active or passive testing of Boolean k-linear functions requires Θ (k log n) queries,
log n
for all k ≤ 10 log
log n .
Theorem 7 and its proof imply a lower bound for active testing of superfamilies of k-linear
functions, such as k-juntas and (n − k)-symmetric functions. A function is called k-junta if it
depends on at most k of its input variables, referred to as the influential variables (e.g., a dictator
function is a 1-junta). We denote the family of k-juntas by Junk . Partially symmetric functions are
a generalization of juntas, where the remaining variables can influence the output of the function,
but only in a symmetric manner.
Definition 8 (Partially symmetric functions [12]). For a subset T ⊆ [n] := {1, . . . , n}, a function
f : Zn2 → Z2 is called T -symmetric if permuting the labels of the variables of T does not change
the function. Moreover, f is called t-symmetric if there exists T ⊆ [n] of size at least t such that f
is T -symmetric. We denote the family of t-symmetric functions by Symt .
Partially symmetric functions were introduced as part of the research of isomorphism testing [12,
14], where it was shown that testing whether a function is (n − k)-symmetric for any k < n/10
can be done using O(k log k) queries. The special case of 2-symmetric functions has already been
considered by Shannon in [25]. In addition to the Ω(k log n) lower bound for active testing of
partially symmetric functions, we provide an upper bound as well as lower and upper bounds for
passive testing (detailed in Table 1). In particular, we show that for a constant k, the family
of partially symmetric functions demonstrates a significant gap among the three different testing
scenarios and proper learning.
Theorem 9. For a constant k we have
Q Symn−k
Q
a
p
Symn−k
= Θ (1) ,
= Θ (log n) ,
p
= Θ(n1/4 log n),
√
Qℓ Symn−k = Θ( n).
Q
Symn−k
3
The last family of functions considered in this work is low degree polynomials, with special
consideration given to linear functions. The following indicates that passive testing of degree d
polynomials, denoted by Pold , is essentially as hard as properly learning them.
Theorem 10. The query complexity of passive testing of degree d polynomials is Θ(nd ), for constant
d.
On the other hand, active testing can be done slightly more efficiently, at least for linear
functions.
Theorem 11. The query complexity of active testing of linear functions is Θ(n/ log n).
Table 1 summarizes the results presented in this work for passive and active testing, as well as
the best known query complexity for the classical model of property testing and proper learning.
Family
Classic (Q)
Active (Qa )
Passive (Qp )
Symmetric
Linear
d-degree
polynomials
O(1)
O(1) [13]
O(1)
Θ(n/ log n)
Θ(n1/4 )
n + Θ(1)
Learning (Qℓ )
√
Θ( n)
n + Θ(1)
Θ(nd )
Θ(nd )
Θ(k log n)
Θ(k log n)
Θ(k log n)
Ω(k log n)
Ω(2k/2 + k log n)
Θ(2k + k log n)
O(2k k log n),
Ω(k log n)
O(n1/4p 2k k log n),
Ω(n1/4 2k + k log n)
k-linear
k-juntas
(n − k)-symmetric
Θ(2d ) [1, 7]
O(k log k),
k − o(k) [9, 11]
O(k log k),
Ω(k)
[9, 10, 15]
O(k log k),
Ω(k) [12]
p
√
Θ( n2k )
Table 1: Summary of best bounds, for fixed ǫ and k < log n/(10 log log n)
The rest of the paper is organized as follows. The lower bound for active testing of k-linear
functions, which applies to juntas and partially symmetric functions as well, is proved in Section 2 by
establishing a general result for random subsets of abelian groups, proved by combining probabilistic
and combinatorial tools including the Talagrand inequality and the Erdős–Rado results on ∆systems. Section 3 provides the lower and upper bounds for active and passive testing of symmetric
and partially symmetric functions, as described in Table 1. The results concerning low degree
polynomials and linear functions in particular are presented in Section 4. Concluding remarks and
open problems are in Section 5. The proofs in Sections 3 and 4 are also based on probabilistic,
combinatorial, and algebraic techniques.
2
k-linear functions
Theorem 7 states that the query complexity of active or passive testing of k-linear functions is
Θ(k log n). The upper bound
can be obtained by applying Propositions 3 and 5, and Fact 6, given
that there are exactly nk different k-linear functions.
In order to prove a lower bound for active testing of k-linear functions, we use the following lemma, which is an adaptation of the tools used in [3] to prove active testing lower bounds
(specifically, Theorem 6.6 and Lemma B.1 ibid).
4
Definition. A property P is called ǫ-nontrivial if a random Boolean function is ǫ-close to P with
probability at most 0.01.
Lemma 12 ([3]). Let P be an ǫ-nontrivial property of Boolean functions and let π be a distribution
supported on P. Given a set S = {x1 , x2 , . . . , xq } of q queries and a vector y ∈ Zq2 , define
πS (y) = Pf ∼π [f (xi ) = yi for i = 1, 2, . . . , q] .
Choose at random a set U of u samples, and suppose that with probability at least
S ⊆ U of q queries and every y ∈ Zq2 satisfy πS (y) < 65 2−q . Then, Qaǫ (P, u) ≥ q.
3
4,
every set
The proof is based on the fact that, under the assumptions of the lemma, q queries do not
suffice to distinguish between a function from the distribution π and a uniform random Boolean
function.
According to Lemma 12, our goal is therefore to show that when we choose a random k-linear
function, querying it at o(k log n) queries chosen from a random space will appear rather random.
To this end we use Lemma 18, which, roughly speaking, assures us that the probability of seeing a
given output vector is very concentrated around the expectation. The proof of the lemma uses the
Talagrand inequality (with an extra twist) and the Erdős–Rado ∆-systems method. Lemma 18, its
proof, and the tools used appear in Section 2.1.
The following theorem provides a lower bound for active testing of k-linear functions, completing
the proof of Theorem 7 (assuming Lemma 18).
Theorem 13. Qa (Link , u) = Ω (k log n) for k ≤ 0.1 log n/ log log n, as long as n ≤ u ≤ 2n
1/7k
.
Proof. Define π to be the uniform distribution over the k-linear functions. In particular, π is the
distribution obtained by choosing distinct i1 , i2 , . . . , ik ∈ [n] uniformly at random and returning
the function f : Zn2 → Z2 defined by f (x) = xi1 + xi2 + · · · + xik . Fix S to be a set of q vectors
in Zn2 . This set can be viewed as a q × n Boolean-valued matrix. We write c1 (S) , . . . , cn (S) to
represent the columns of this matrix. For any y ∈ Zq2 ,
πS (y) =
n
k
!−1 (
!
X
[n]
I∈
:
ci (S) = y
k
i∈I
)
.
Since Link is, say, 0.4-nontrivial, by Lemma 12, to prove that Qa (Link , u) = Ω (k log n), it
suffices to show that when
U is a set of u vectors chosen uniformly and independently at random
from Zn2 and, say, q = 1 − k1 log nk + k, then with probability at least 43 , every set S ⊂ U of size
|S| = q and every y ∈ Zq2 satisfy πS (y) ≤ 65 2−q . To this end, we would like to show that πS (y) is
highly concentrated around E[πS (y)] = 2−q .
1−1/k
To apply Lemma 18, consider the group G = Zq2 and let N = |G| = 2q = 2k nk
. By
1/7k
1/7k
n
⌋ ≥ n and let λ = ⌈qn
⌉ ≥ q log u. Now, for large enough n
monotonicity, we assume u = ⌊2
conditions (3a) and (3b) of the lemma hold. Indeed, to prove the first inequality note that
800 ln 2 · kN λ
2k+1
n
= 800 ln 2
k
!1−1/k
k
k2 ⌈qn
1/7k 2k+1
⌉
!1−1/k
n
≤ 800
k
Since k < 0.1 log n/ log log n and q < 2k log n < (log n)2 , we have
800(2qn
1/7k 2k+1
)
√
= o( n) < n/k <
5
!1/k
n
k
.
· (2qn1/7k )2k+1 .
(1)
Therefore, the right-hand-side of (1) is smaller than
To prove the second inequality note that
λ
λN
=
k2k
n1−1/k
k
k
≥
However,
qn1/7k
n
k
n1/k
k
k
(n − k + 1)qn1/7k
k
n1/k
k
k
=
≥Ω
n
k ,
establishing (3a).
(n − k + 1)qn1/7k
k
n1/k
k
k
nk log n
nk
!
n
.
k−1
(2)
> 1,
n
and therefore the right-hand-side of (2) is bigger than k−1
, proving (3b).
Thus, for any fixed vector y ∈ Zq2 , the probability that more than 56 nk 2−q k-sets of columns of
S sum to y is at most 5 · 2−λ . Furthermore, when U is defined as above, we can apply the union
bound over all y ∈ G and over all subsets S ⊆ U of size |S| = q to obtain
6
P ∃S, y : πS (y) > 2−q ≤
5
!
u
uq q
· 2 · 5 · 2−q log u = o (1) ,
· 2q · 5 · 2−λ ≤
q!
q
establishing the theorem.
The above theorem and its proof immediately imply a lower bound for active testing of both
k-juntas and (n − k)-symmetric functions. This can also be applied to show lower bounds for other
concise representation families, such as small DNF formulas, small decision trees, small Boolean
formulas, and small Boolean circuits (see [17]).
Corollary 14. Qa (Junk ) = Ω(k log n) and Qa (Symn−k ) = Ω(k log n) for k = O (log n/ log log n).
Proof. The same distribution π from the proof of Theorem 13 (uniform distribution over the klinear functions) is supported on k-juntas (resp., (n − k)-symmetric functions) and these properties,
too, are still 0.4-nontrivial.
In Section 3 we continue the investigation of active and passive testing of partially symmetric
functions. The following proposition summarizes what we know about passive testing of k-juntas.
Proposition 15. Ω(2k/2 + k log n) ≤ Qp (Junk ) ≤ O 2k + k log n .
Proof. The upper
bound is obtained by applying Proposition 5 and Fact 6, as the number of
k
k-juntas is nk 22 . The lower bound is a combination of two separate bounds:2 Ω (k log n) by
Corollary 14 and Ω 2k/2 for verifying that the input function is indeed a junta, even when the set
of the influencing variables is known in advance. Indeed, assume we are given the input function
with a promise that it is either a random junta over the first k variables or a random function.
Distinguishing between these two cases is impossible unless we have a pair of inputs agreeing on
the first k variables; among less than 12 2k/2 queries, we get such a pair with probability at most
1
2
1 k/2
22
2.1
2
· 2−k = 1/8.
Proof of main lemma
Before we state the formal lemma, we introduce the two following combinatorial and probabilistic
tools used in the proof.
2
Although Corollary 14 only holds for k = O(log n/ log log n), for larger values of k its contribution to the lower
bound is negligible.
6
Erdős–Rado ∆-systems
Definition. Let a, b be positive integers. We say that a family of a sets, each of size b, forms a
∆-system of size a if all pairs have the same intersection.
Erdős and Rado proved that every large enough family of sets contains a large ∆-system.
Theorem 16 ([18, Theorem 3]). Let F be a family of sets, each of size b. Then F contains
∆-system of size a whenever |F| ≥ (a − 1)b+1 b!.
Talagrand’s concentration inequality
In its general form, Talagrand’s inequality is an isoperimetric inequality for product probability
spaces. We use the following formulation from [23] (see also [2, 26]), suitable for showing that a
random variable in a product space is concentrated around its expectation under two conditions:
Theorem 17 ([23, page 81]). Let X ≥ 0 be a non-trivial random variable, determined by n
independent trials T1 , . . . , Tn . If there exist c, r > 0 such that
(i) X is c-Lipschitz: changing the outcome of one trial can affect X by at most c, and
(ii) X is r-certifiable: for any s, if X ≥ s then there is a set of at most rs trials whose outcomes
certify that X ≥ s,
then for any 0 ≤ t ≤ E [X],
where τ = c2 rE [X].
√
P |X − E [X]| > t + 60 τ < 4 exp −t2 /8τ ,
We now state the main lemma.
Lemma 18. Let G be an abelian group of order N , and let n ∈ N. Consider a random sequence
X = (x1 , x2 , . . . , xn ), where each xi ∈ G is chosen uniformly and independently
at randomo (with
n
P
repetitions). Fix y ∈ G and k ∈ N, and let Y = |Y|, where Y = I ∈ [n]
:
i∈I xi = y . Let
k
λ ≥ 2 log N be a positive integer and assume that
n
k
!
≥ 800 ln 2 · kN λ2k+1 ; and
!
n
λN
≤ k.
k2
k−1
Then,
(3a)
(3b)
1
P |Y − E [Y ]| > E [Y ] < 5 · 2−λ .
5
Proof. For k = 1 we have Y ∼ Bin (n, 1/N ) and the result is implied by Chernoff’s inequality,
so we henceforth assume k ≥ 2. We would like to use Talagrand’s inequality to prove that Y
is concentrated around E [Y ], but Y does not satisfy the Lipschitz condition necessary for its
application. Let us thus define Ŷ = Ŷ , where Ŷ ⊆ Y is maximal such that, for all j ∈ [n], xj
belongs to at most c sets I ∈ Ŷ; the exact value of c will be determined later.
7
n
[n]\{j}
k−1
First we bound the probability that Ŷ 6= Y . Let Yj = I ∈
rem 16, there exists a ∆-system Zj ⊆ Yj of size
|Zj | ≥ 1 +
o
: I ∪ {j} ∈ Y . By Theo-
q
k
|Yj | / (k − 1)! > |Yj |1/k e/k,
where every two distinct I1 , I2 ∈ Zj have the same intersection Kj = I1 ∩ I2 . Thus, Zj′ =
P
{I \ Kj : I ∈ Zj } is a collection of sj = Zj′ = |Zj | disjoint k′ -sets such that i∈I xi = z for
P
all I ∈ Zj′ , where k′ = k − 1 − |Kj | ≤ k − 1 and z = y − xj − i∈Kj xi .
Consider the event Ez (s), defined as the existence of a collection of s disjoint k′ -subsets of X
that all sum to the same element z ∈ G. Then,
!
n
1 n
P [Ez (s)] ≤
N −s ≤
s! k′
k′ , k′ , . . . , k′
|
{z
s
}
!s
N
−s
n
e
sN k − 1
≤
!!s
≤
eλ
sk2k
s
,
and thus we have, for the choice of c = λk ,
h
i
h
P Y > Ŷ ≤ P [∃j ∈ [n] : |Yj | > c] ≤ P ∃j ∈ [n] : sj > c1/k e/k
≤ P [∃z ∈ G : Ez (eλ/k)] ≤ N 2−k
eλ/k
i
(4)
= 2log N −eλ < 2−2λ .
This also serves to show that E [Y ] and E[Ŷ ] are very close, since
!
!2
2
1
λ2 2−λ
< .
64
32
(5)
Next we apply Talagrand’s inequality to bound the deviation of Ŷ from E[Ŷ ]. By definition,
Ŷ is c-Lipschitz; moreover, to prove that Ŷ ≥ s we only need to reveal s k-sets, i.e., reveal xi for
P
at most ks values of i. For every choice of I ∈ [n]
i∈I xi is a random element of G and thus
k ,
E [Y ] = nk /N ≥ 800 ln 2 · kλ2k+1 .
Set τ = c2 kE[Ŷ ]. By Theorem 17,
h
i
h
i
E Y − Ŷ ≤ max Y − Ŷ ·P Y > Ŷ ≤
P Ŷ − E[Ŷ ] >
n −2λ
2
≤
k
n
k−1
√
1
E[Y ] + 60 τ ≤ 4 exp −E[Y ]2 /800τ
10
2−2λ ≤
λN
k2k
2−2λ ≤
≤ 4 exp −E[Y ]/800c2 k < 4 exp −λ2k+1 ln 2/c2 = 4 · 2−λ .
(6)
Putting (4), (5) and (6) together,
h
i
1
1
P |Y − E [Y ]| > E [Y ] ≤ P Y > Ŷ + P Ŷ − E [Y ] > E [Y ]
5
5
h i
1
1
−λ
≤ 2 + P Ŷ − E Ŷ > E [Y ] −
< 5 · 2−λ ,
5
32
√
1
1
≥ 10
E [Y ] + 60 τ , satisfied whenever λ ≥ 650.
under the condition 15 E [Y ] − 32
3
Partially symmetric functions
A key concept in the study of symmetric and partially symmetric functions is the following notion:
8
Definition ([12, Definition 3.1]). The symmetric influence of a set T ⊆ [n] of variables in a Boolean
function f : Zn2 → Z2 is defined as
SymInf f (T ) = Px∈Zn2 ,σ∈Sn [f (x) 6= f (σ (x)) | ∀i 6∈ T : σ (i) = i] .
By definition, a T -symmetric function f has SymInf f (T ) = 0; conversely, for functions far from
being T -symmetric we have the following lemma:
Lemma 19 ([12, Lemma 3.3]). If f is ǫ-far from being T -symmetric, then SymInf f (T ) ≥ ǫ.
In other words, distinguishing between a T -symmetric function and one far from being T symmetric can be done by estimating the symmetric influence.
The following proposition determines the number of queries needed for passive and active testing
of symmetric Boolean functions. Although these results are a special case of partially symmetric
functions, we feel that this serves as an introduction and provides some intuition.
Proposition 20. Qp (Symn ) = Θ(n1/4 ) and Qa (Symn ) = O(1).
Proof. A symmetric function is characterized by its layers of different Hamming weight. For each
Hamming weight between 0 and n, the function outputs a consistent value. To test symmetry given
a function, it suffices to randomly choose an input x ∈ Zn2 and a permutation of it, and see if the
output is consistent over the two inputs. Since the Hamming weight of x is distributed
Bin (n,
p 1/2),
two random inputs share the same Hamming weight with probability 4−n 2n
=
(1
+
o
(1))
2/πn;
n
1 1/4
having fewer than 2 n
random samples yields even a single such pair with probability at most
1
2
1 1/4
2n
2 p
·
2/πn < 1/8.
On the other hand, among 4 (2πn)1/4 random samples, it is not hard to see that the probability
of not having such a pair is smaller than, say, 1/7. (One way to show this fact is by looking for
matches between the first and second halves of the samples, assuming the first half did not yield
such a pair already. In this case with high probability the total measure of the layers in which we
1
have a representative from the first half is at least (2πn)
1/4 and conditioning on this, the probability
that no sample from the second half falls into one of these layers is smaller than e−2 .)
By Markov, repeating this 14/ǫ times results in at least 12/ǫ sets without a desired pair with
probability at most 1/6. Therefore, with probability at least 5/6, we have at least 2/ǫ pairs. By
Lemma 19, if the function is ǫ-far from being symmetric then each such pair will have different
outputs with probability at least ǫ, so we will fail to detect this with probability (1 − ǫ)2/ǫ < 1/e2 .
Altogether the success probability exceeds 2/3.
In the context of active testing, given a sample space of, say, u = n/ǫ vectors we can easily find
2/ǫ input pairs with the same Hamming weight each, thus testing whether the input function is
indeed symmetric can be done using 4/ǫ queries.
Remark. Consider the following slight modification of the algorithms above. Instead of rejecting
the input function upon the first example of it not being symmetric, we estimate its symmetric
influence by counting the number of such examples among all pairs. This enables us to passively
(resp., actively)distinguish
that is ǫ/2-close to being symmetric and one that
between a function
−2
1/4
−2
is ǫ-far using O ǫ n
(resp., O ǫ ) queries. Such an algorithm is called a tolerant tester.
Some families of Boolean functions, such as symmetric and partially symmetric functions, have
many pairs of functions which are close to one another. In these cases, the upper bound of Fact 6,
which relies only on the size of the family, is not tight. We remedy this by proving the following
refined version.
9
Definition 21. Let P be a family of Boolean functions and let ǫ > 0. Denote by Iǫ (P) a subfamily
of P of maximal size such that every two distinct f, g ∈ Iǫ (P) are ǫ-far.
Proposition 22. Let P be a family of Boolean functions and let ǫ > 0. Then
⌊log |I2ǫ (P)|⌋ ≤ Qℓǫ (P) ≤
l
64
ǫ
m
ln Iǫ/2 (P) .
Proof. A proper learning algorithm for P is required to return a function from P that is ǫ-close
to the input function. Since functions in I2ǫ (P) are 2ǫ-far from one another, the algorithm has
to return a different output for each of them. Any deterministic algorithm making q queries
can only have 2q different outputs, so if it performs less than ⌊log |I2ǫ (P)|⌋ queries, it must be
wrong with probability at least 1/2. A randomized algorithm for this problem can be viewed as a
distribution over deterministic algorithms (as the queries are chosen randomly and the algorithm
is non-adaptive), and therefore cannot improve the success probability beyond 1/2.
Next, consider the following learning algorithm: given an input function f ∈l P, return the funcm
tion g ∈ Iǫ/2 (P) that agrees with f on as many queries as possible out of q = (64/ǫ) ln Iǫ/2 (P)
random queries. By definition, f is ǫ/2-close to some f ′ ∈ Iǫ/2 (P); therefore, f and f ′ disagree on
each query with probability at most ǫ/2, independently. The total number of disagreements is thus
dominated by a Bin (q, ǫ/2) random variable and hence with high probability they disagree on fewer
than 3ǫq/4 queries. Using a similar argument, a function h ∈ Iǫ/2 (P) that is ǫ-far from f will dis−2
agree with f on more than 3ǫq/4 queries with probability at least 1−exp (−ǫq/32) = 1− Iǫ/2 (P) .
By the union bound, with high probability no such h will outperform f ′ and thus the algorithm
will return a function that is ǫ-close to f (the obvious candidate being f ′ ).
√
√
Corollary 23. Qℓ (Symn−k ) = Θ(2k n − k) for k < n; in particular, Qℓ (Symn ) = Θ( n).
Proof. First, we show that Iǫ/2 (Symn−k ) = 2O(2
k
√
n−k )
. The binomial distribution Bin (n − k, 1/2)
m
lp
is concentrated around its center, and in particular the middle ℓ = 1 + 2
(n − k) ln (4/ǫ) /2 layers account for at least 1 − ǫ/2 of the weight. In other words, every (n − k)-symmetric function is
(ǫ/2)-close to an ℓ-canonical (n − k)-symmetric function, which is zero outside the middle ℓ layers.
k
We can thus bound Iǫ/2 (Symn−k ) from above by 22 ℓ , the number of ℓ-canonical functions.
j√
k
For the lower bound, consider the middle ℓ′ = 1 + 2 n − k layers. The weight ratio between
n−k
⌊(n−k)/2⌋ /
k ′
n−k√
2
2 ℓ
⌊(n−k)/2− n−k⌋ < e . Let C ⊂ Z2 be an
k−1 ′
error correcting code of rate 1/2 and relative distance 1/10; in other words, C has at least 22 ℓ
codewords, every pair of which are (1/10)-far. We can interpret each codeword as an ℓ′ -canonical
(n − k)-symmetric function, which is 1/10e2 -far from the rest. Hence we get I2ǫ (Symn−k ) ≥
k−1 ′
22 ℓ as long as ǫ < 1/20e2 .
Therefore, for our fixed ǫ, the result follows from Proposition 22.
any pair of these layers is bounded by
Proposition 25 provides an upper bound for the query complexity of passive and active testing
of partially symmetric functions. Its proof relies on the following simple concentration claim in
which we make no attempt to optimize the estimates.
Claim 24. There is an absolute constant b > 0 such that for every c, 0 < c < 1 the following
holds. Let s and t be integers satisfying s < t. Let P be an arbitrary probability distribution on t
bins, where the probability of each bin is at least c/t. Then, when we throw s balls randomly and
10
independently into t bins according to the probability P , the probability of getting less than cs2 /9t
collisions3 is at most exp −bcs2 /t .
Proof. If the number of occupied bins is less than s/3 after ⌈s/2⌉ balls were thrown, then we already
have at least s/6 > cs2 /9t collisions. Otherwise, each of the next ⌊s/2⌋ balls has a probability of at
least cs/3t to collide with these occupied bins, independently. The number of collisions created by
the last ⌊s/2⌋ balls thus dominates a binomial Bin (⌊s/2⌋, cs/3t) random variable. By Chernoff, it
is less than cs2 /9t with probability at most exp −bcs2 /t .
√
Proposition 25. Qp (Symn−k ) = O n1/4 2k/2 k log n and Qa (Symn−k ) = O 2k k log n , for k =
o (log n).
Proof. We begin with a passive√testing algorithm. Let f be the tested Boolean function. Our
algorithm asks q = d(ǫ)n1/4 2k/2 k log n queries, and if the results obtained are consistent with f
being (n − k)-symmetric it accepts, otherwise it rejects. It remains to show that if f is ǫ-far from
being (n − k)-symmetric the algorithm rejects with high probability. Assume this is the case and
fix a k-set T ∈ [n]
k of variables. If we choose a random vector x and another random vector y
obtained from x by permuting the elements in [n] \ T the probability that f (x) 6= f (y) is at least
ǫ by Lemma 19. By Claim 24 (where each bin corresponds to the ordered pair consisting of the
√
projection on T and the Hamming weight of a typical vector, which is within distance Θ( n) from
n/2), for an appropriately chosen d(ǫ), with probability at least 1 − n−k our queries will contain
2
more than 0.5 d(ǫ)
9 k log n > k log n/ǫ random disjoint pairs x, y which have the same Hamming
weight and agree on T . The probability that none of these pairs will satisfy f (x) 6= f (y) is at most
(1 − ǫ)k log n/ǫ < n−k . The union bound thus completes the argument.
The same argument implies that the query complexity of active testing is O 2k k log n because
√
the only queries
the passive algorithm above actually used are the results for the Θ(q 2 / n) =
Θ 2k k log n pairs x, y which agree on their Hamming weight. The active algorithm will thus
simply select from the sample Θ 2k k log n disjoint pairs with the same Hamming weight and
proceed as the passive algorithm.
The following proposition provides a lower bound for the query complexity of passive testing
of partially symmetric functions. Note that it matches the upper bound, up to a constant factor,
when k is constant.
√
Proposition 26. Qp (Symn−k ) = Ω n1/4 2k/2 + k log n .
Proof. As in the proof of Proposition 15, we use a combination of two lower bounds. The first one,
Ω(n1/4 2k/2 ), is required even when the identity of the k asymmetric variables is known in advance.
Assuming we are given the promise that the input function is either (n − k)-symmetric and the
asymmetric variables are the first k variables, or it is far from being partially symmetric, one still
needs to verify the partial symmetry. The only way to verify it is by having pairs of inputs that
share Hamming weight and agree on the values
of the
first k variables. However, we expect to see
no such pairs if the number of queries is o n1/4 2k/2 .
The second part of the lower bound uses the Ω(k log n) bound of Theorem 13. We wish to show
that distinguishing the sum of a random k-linear function
a random
symmetric function cannot
and
√
be distinguished from a random function, given q = o n1/4 k log n queries. Indeed, assume this
3
A single collision happens every time we place a ball in an already occupied bin.
11
many queries were performed and denote by H ⊆ {0, 1, . . . , n} the set of Hamming weights attained
by at least two queries. A balls and bins argument shows that we expect only o (k log n) queries
whose Hamming weight lies in H. Due to the random symmetric function, the algorithm cannot
extract any information from queries that have a unique Hamming weight. Say that we reveal to
the algorithm the value of the random symmetric function on H. Now, the algorithm has o(k log n)
queries and it must distinguish between a k-linear function and a random function. Even if the
algorithm were allowed to choose which queries to pick out of the initial set of q queries, the lower
bound for active testing of k-linear functions indicates this cannot be done.
Theorem 9 follows from Propositions 25 and 26 and Corollaries 14 and 23, as well as the results
of [12].
4
Low degree polynomials
P
n
We prove Theorem 10 for a more general case, allowing 1 ≤ d ≤ n1/3 . Let ≤d
= di=0 ni be the
n
number of monomials of degree at most d. Note that for constant d, we have ≤d
= Θ(nd ).
Theorem (Restatement of Theorem 10). Qp (Pold ) = Θ(
n
≤d ).
n
(≤d
) , hence by Fact 6 and Proposition 5, passive
Proof. The number of polynomials
of
degree
d
is
2
n
n
) queries. We now show a lower bound of Ω( ≤d
) queries.
testing can be done using O( ≤d
j
k
n
/2e random queries performed by a passive
Let x1, x2, . . . , xq ∈ Zn2 be the set of q = ≤d
n
( )
tester. For i = 1, . . . , q, define yi ∈ Z2≤d to be the d-evaluation of xi , that is, the evaluations of
all possible monomials of degree at most d at xi . It suffices to show that {yi } qi=1 are most likely
n
linearly independent to conclude that any testing algorithm performs badly; indeed, since the ≤d
q
monomials serve as a basis to Pold , {yi } i=1 being linearly independent implies that every possible
output (f (x1 ), . . . , f (xq )) ∈ Zq2 is equally likely when choosing a random f ∈ Pold , so the tester
sees a uniform distribution and therefore cannot decide.
In order to show that, with high probability, these vectors are linearly independent, we bound
the probability that yi is spanned by y1 , . . . , yi−1 , and then apply the union bound to show that
none of these events is likely to occur. Let Vi = span {y1 , . . . , yi−1 } be the linear space spanned by
the first i − 1 vectors. By Lemma 4 from [6], since
dim Vi ≤ i − 1 < q ≤
!
!
d
X
n
⌈n(1 − 1/d)⌉
/2e ≤
,
≤d
i
i=0
no more than 2⌈n(1−1/d)⌉ d-evaluations of vectors from Zn2 reside in Vi . Thus, P [yi ∈ Vi ] ≤ 2−⌈n/d⌉
and, by the union bound, P [∃i : yi ∈ Vi ] ≤ q · 2−⌈n/d⌉ = o(1) for d ≤ n1/3 .
We now focus on linear functions, for which we determine the passive query complexity up to
an additive constant term. We slightly abuse notation by using Pol1 to denote the family of linear
functions, even though degree 1 polynomials include both linear and affine functions.
Proposition 27. Qp (Pol1 ) = n + Θ(1).
Proof. As in the proof of Theorem 10, a linearly independent query set is useless for the testing
algorithm. Let x1, x2, . . . , xq be a sequence of q ≤ n queries and define Xi to be the event that
12
xi ∈ span {x1 , . . . , xi−1 }. The probability that some linear dependency exists among the q queries
is
P
"
q
[
i=1
#
Xi = P
q
[
i=1
Xi \
i−1
[
j=1
Xj =
q
X
i=1
P Xi \
i−1
[
j=1
Xj ≤
q
X
2i−1−n =
i=1
2q − 1
.
2n
For q > n, surely any set of q queries is linearly dependent.
Given the computation above, a set of q ≤ n−2 queries is expected to be linearly dependent with
probability smaller than 1/4. On the other hand, n + O(1) queries are very likely to provide a basis
for Zn2 and O (1) linear dependencies, so we can learn the unique linear function consistent with
the basis and then verify it; if the function is ǫ-far from linear, each additional query is inconsistent
with the learned function with a constant probability.
Active testing allows us to reduce the query complexity by a logarithmic factor, in comparison
to passive testing. We first prove the following lemma, which is an extension of the analysis of the
BLR test provided by Bellare et al. [4].
Lemma 28. Given a function f : Zn2 → Z2 that is ǫ-far from being linear,
Px1 ,x2 ,...,x2k ∈Zn2 [f (x1 ) + · · · + f (x2k ) = f (x1 + · · · + x2k )] ≤
1
2
+ 12 (1 − 2ǫ)2k−1
P
P
Proof. Since f is ǫ-far from being linear, when writing it in the Fourier basis f (y) = S⊆[n] fˆ (S) i∈S yi
all of its Fourier coefficients {fˆ(S) : S ⊆ [n]} are bounded from above by 1 − 2ǫ. Similar to the
analysis for the case k = 1, the success probability of this test is:
1
1
2+2
X
S⊆[n]
fˆ(S)2k+1 ≤ 12 + 12
max fˆ(S)2k−1
S⊆[n]
!
X
S⊆[n]
fˆ(S)2 = 21 + 12 max fˆ(S)2k−1 ≤ 12 + 21 (1−2ǫ)2k−1 ,
S⊆[n]
where the middle equality holds by Parseval’s theorem.
Unlike the BLR test, which uses the case k = 1, in the context of active testing we need k to
be almost linear in n, hence little amplification is necessary.
Theorem (Restatement of Theorem 11). Qa (Pol1 , u) = Θ(n/ log u), for u ≥ n2 .
Proof. As done in the previous proof, we bound the number of queries from below by showing that
one is not expected to find a linear dependency of size smaller than n/(2 log u) among a set of u
samples. The expected number of linear dependencies of size at most q is at most
q
X
u
i=0
i
!
2−n ≤ uq 2−n = 2q log u−n ≤ 2−n/2 ,
assuming q ≤ n/(2 log u). By Markov’s inequality, the probability of having such a linear dependency is o (1) and therefore Ω( logn u ) queries are needed.
Given an input function that is ǫ-far from being linear, we use the test of Lemma 28 to identify
u
this. Fix q = 4 ⌈n/ log u⌉. Given a sample U of u vectors, it contains q/2
> 2n subsets of size q/2.
By the pigeonhole principle two of these sets have the same sum, hence there is a linear dependency
of length at most q. On the other hand, by the previous computation, with high probability there is
no linear dependency of size less than n/(2 log u) = q/8 hence the length exceeds q/8. By Lemma 28
the probability that f passes a single such test is at most 12 + 12 (1 − 2ǫ)q/8−1 < 21 + 12 (1 − 2ǫ)n/2 log u .
Since ǫ is constant, for large enough n this is smaller than 0.9, thus repeating the test a constant
number of times reduces the probability of f passing all of them to less than 1/3 (obviously we
never reject a linear function).
13
5
Discussion
Throughout this work we have demonstrated new bounds for the number of queries needed for
active and passive testing of several properties. In particular, we now know the amount of queries
needed for testing k-linear functions in these new models.
A practical aspect of property testing algorithms that we did not cover is the actual running
time, rather than just the number of queries performed, which was the only concern in this work.
Some of the algorithms we presented, especially those based on proper learning, have an exponential
run-time complexity and it would be interesting to see whether active or passive testing can be
done while maintaining polynomial running time.
Quite a few of the passive testing algorithms we provided can in fact be made tolerant; that is,
they can be modified to accept functions close to satisfying the property while rejecting functions
far from satisfying it (with some gap in between). For simplicity we did not explicitly show that.
Such modifications usually do not have an effect on the asymptotic query complexity.
While Section 4 provides a tight analysis of active and passive testing of linear functions, for
low degree polynomials our analysis is only tight for passive testing. Extrapolating based on the
behavior of linear functions, it seems natural to expect that the query complexity of active testing of
low degree polynomials is asymptotically lower than passive testing, perhaps by a polylogarithmic
factor. This question remains open at the moment.
Finally we mention that Lemma 18, used in the proof of Theorem 13, can be used in the study
of a seemingly unrelated problem of exhibiting a very sharp cutoff phenomenon in the mixing time
of random walks in random (dense) Cayley graphs of abelian groups. Indeed, the lemma implies
that for any abelian group G of order N , and for (log N )1/3 ≤ k ≤ (log N )1/2−δ , if we choose
d ≈ N 1/(k−1) random elements of G, then a random walk of length k − 1 in the resulting Cayley
graph of G is far from being mixing (simply because we cannot reach most of the elements at
all) while a random walk of length k is already mixing. While it is more interesting to study this
problem for much sparser random Cayley graphs (see [22] for some related results), even the above
statement for the dense case is interesting.
References
[1] Noga Alon, Tali Kaufman, Michael Krivelevich, Simon Litsyn, and Dana Ron, Testing lowdegree polynomials over GF(2). In: Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Approximation Algorithms for Combinatorial Optimization Problems and 7th International Workshop
on Randomization and Approximation Techniques in Computer Science (RANDOM–APPROX
’03), pp. 188–199, 2003.
[2] Noga Alon and Joel H. Spencer, The Probabilistic Method (3rd Edition). Wiley, New York,
2008.
[3] Maria-Florina Balcan, Eric Blais, Avrim Blum, and Liu Yang, Active property testing. In:
Proceedings of the 53rd Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS
’12), pp. 21–30, 2012.
[4] Mihir Bellare, Don Coppersmith, Johan Håstad, Marcos Kiwi, and Madhu Sudan, Linearity
testing in characteristic two. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 42(6): 1781–1796,
1996.
14
[5] László Babai, Lance Fortnow, and Carsten Lund. Nondeterministic exponential time has twoprover interactive protocols. Computational Complexity 1(1):3–40, 1991
[6] Ido Ben-Eliezer, Rani Hod, and Shachar Lovett, Random low-degree polynomials are hard to
approximate. Computational Complexity 21(1): 63–81, 2012.
[7] Arnab Bhattacharyya, Swastik Kopparty, Grant Schoenebeck, Madhu Sudan, and David Zuckerman, Optimal testing of Reed-Muller codes. In: Proceedings of the 51st Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS ’10), pp. 488–497, 2010.
[8] Eric Blais, Improved bounds for testing juntas. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Approximation Algorithms for Combinatorial Optimization Problems and 12th International Workshop on Randomization and Approximation Techniques in Computer Science
(RANDOM–APPROX ’08), pp. 317–330, 2008.
[9] Eric Blais, Testing juntas nearly optimally. In: Proceedings of the 41st Annual ACM Symposium
on Theory of Computing (STOC’ 09), pp. 151–158, 2009.
[10] Eric Blais, Joshua Brody, and Kevin Matulef, Property Testing Lower Bounds via Communication Complexity. Computational Complexity 21(2):311–358, 2012.
[11] Eric Blais and Daniel Kane, Tight bounds for testing k-linearity. In: Proceedings of the 15th
International Workshop on Approximation Algorithms for Combinatorial Optimization Problems and 16th International Workshop on Randomization and Approximation Techniques in
Computer Science (RANDOM–APPROX ’12), pp. 435–446, 2012.
[12] Eric Blais, Amit Weinstein, and Yuichi Yoshida, Partially symmetric functions are efficiently
isomorphism-testable. Proceedings of the 53rd Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of
Computer Science (FOCS ’12), pp. 551–560, 2012. Also: SIAM J. on Computing 44(2):411–
432, 2015.
[13] Manuel Blum, Michael Luby, and Ronitt Rubinfeld, Self-testing/correcting with applications
to numerical problems. In: J. of Computer and System Sciences 47:549–595, 1993.
[14] Sourav Chakraborty, Eldar Fischer, David García–Soriano, and Arie Matsliah, Juntosymmetric functions, hypergraph isomorphism, and crunching. In: Proceedings of the 27th
Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity (CCC ’12), pp. 148–158, 2012.
[15] Hana Chockler and Dan Gutfreund, A lower bound for testing juntas. Information Processing
Letters 90(6):301–305, 2004.
[16] David Cohn, Les Atlas, and Richard Ladner, Improving generalization with active learning. In:
Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML ’94), pp. 201–
221, 1994.
[17] Ilias Diakonikolas, Homin Lee, Kevin Matulef, Krzysztof Onak, Ronitt Rubinfeld, Rocco Servedio, and Andrew Wan. Testing for concise representations. In: Proceedings of the 48th Annual
IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS ’07), pp. 549–558, 2007.
[18] Paul Erdős and Richard Rado, Intersection theorems for systems of sets. J. London
Math. Soc. 35(1): 85–90, 1960.
15
[19] Eldar Fischer, Guy Kindler, Dana Ron, Shmuel Safra, and Alex Samorodnitsky, Testing juntas.
J. of Computer and System Sciences 68(4):753–787, 2004.
[20] Oded Goldreich, Shafi Goldwasser, and Dana Ron, Property testing and its connection to
learning and approximation. J.of the ACM 45(4):653–750, 1998.
[21] Michael Kearns and Dana Ron, Testing problems with sublearning sample complexity. J. of
Computer and System Sciences 61(3):428–456, 2000.
[22] Eyal Lubetzky and Allan Sly, Cutoff phenomena for random walks on random regular graphs.
Duke Mathematical Journal 153(3):475–510, 2010.
[23] Michael Molloy and Bruce Reed, Graph colouring and the probabilistic method,
Springer, 2002.
[24] Ronitt Rubinfeld and Madhu Sudan, Robust characterizations of polynomials with applications
to program testing. SIAM J. on Computing 25(2):252–271, 1996.
[25] Claude E. Shannon, The synthesis of two-terminal switching circuits. Bell System Technical
Journal 28(1):59–98, 1949.
[26] Michel Talagrand, Concentration of measure and isoperimetric inequalities in product spaces.
Publications Mathématiques de l’IHÉS 81:73–203, 1995.
[27] Leslie G. Valiant, A theory of the learnable. Communications of the ACM 27(11):1134–1142,
1984.
16
| 8cs.DS
|
Best-case Analysis of MergeSort
with an Application to the Sum of Digits Problem
arXiv:1607.04604v2 [cs.DM] 5 Dec 2016
A manuscript (MS) v2,II intended for future journal publicationI
MAREK A. SUCHENEK
California State University Dominguez Hills, Department of Computer Science,
1000 E. Victoria St., Carson, CA 90747, USA, [email protected]
Abstract
An exact formula
blg nc
X
n
n
B(n) = (blg nc + 1) −
2k Zigzag ( k+1 ),
2
2
k=0
where
Zigzag(x) = min(x − bxc, dxe − x),
for the minimum number B(n) of comparisons of keys performed by MergeSort
on an n-element array is derived and analyzed. The said formula is less complex than any other known formula for the same and can be evaluated in
O(logc ) time, where c is a constant. It is shown that there is no closed-form
formula for the above. Other variants for B(n) are described as well.
Since the recurrence relation for the minimum number of comparisons of
keys for MergeSort is identical with a recurrence relation for the number
of 1s in binary expansions of all integers between 0 and n (exclusively), the
above results extend to the sum of binary digits problem.
I
c 2016 Marek A. Suchenek.
This is a longer (new Sections 7, 8, and 9 added) version v2 of the article [Suc16]
deposited at ArXive on July 15, 2016, under the same title. These new Sections contain
the detailed analytic proofs of Theorems 2.2, 3.1, and 4.1 that were not included in the
original version v1 of this article. Other than that, the current version v2 is identical with
the original version v1.
II
Preprint submitted to arXiv.org for the record as a manuscript.
December 6, 2016
M. A. Suchenek: Best-case Analysis of MergeSort (MS) v2
2
Keywords: MergeSort, sum of digits, sorting, best case.
2010 MSC: 68W40 Analysis of algorithms,
2010 MSC: 11A63 Radix representation
ACM Computing Classification
Theory of computation: Design and analysis of algorithms: Data structures
design and analysis: Sorting and searching
Mathematics of computing: Discrete mathematics: Graph theory: Trees
Mathematics of computing: Continuous mathematics: Calculus
Contents
1 Introduction
3
2 MergeSort and its best-case behavior
2.1 Recursion tree . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.2 Best-case and its characterization B(n) . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.3 Zigzag function . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3
5
5
8
3 A fractal in B(n)
11
4 Computing F̃ (x) and B(n) from one another
16
5 Relationship between the best case and the worst case
18
6 The sum of digits problem
20
7 Proof of Theorem 2.2 page 8, Subsection 2.3
20
8 Proof of Theorem 3.1 page 15, Section 3
23
9 Proof of Theorem 4.1 page 17, Section 4
28
AppendixP A
A derivation of the worst-case running time
W (n) = ni=1 dlg ie of MergeSort
32
P
n+i
36
Appendix B
Proof of m−1
i=0 b m c = n
M. A. Suchenek: Best-case Analysis of MergeSort (MS) v2
3
1. Introduction
“One Picture is Worth a Thousand Words”
[An advertisement for the San Antonio Light (1918)]
Teaching undergraduate Analysis of Algorithms has been a rewarding,
although a bit taxing, experience. I was often surprised to learn that many
basic problems that clearly belong to its core syllabus had been left unanswered or partially answered. Also, it seemed a bit odd to me that many
otherwise decent texts offered unnecessarily imprecise computations1 of several rather fundamental results.
In this article, I pursue a seemingly marginal topic, the best-case behavior
of a well-known sorting algorithm MergeSort, which pursuit, however, yields
some interesting findings that could hardly be characterized as “marginal.”
It turns out that - contrary to what a casual student of this subject might
believe - computing the exact formula for the number of comparisons of keys
that MergeSort performs on any n-element array in the best case is not a
routine exercise and leads to a problem that gained some notoriety for being
a hard nut to crack analytically: the sum of digits problem. Even more
unexpectedly, a relatively straightforward2 formula for the said number of
comparisons yields an improvement of a well-known answer to this instance
of the sum of digits problem:
How many 1s appear in binary representations of all integers between (but not including) 0 and n?
2. MergeSort and its best-case behavior
A call to MergeSort inherits an n-element array A of integers and sorts
it non-decreasingly, following the steps described below.
Algorithm MergeSort 2.1. To sort an n-element array A do:
1. If n ≤ 1 then return A to the caller,
2. If n ≥ 2 then
1
2
A notable exception in this category is [SF13].
Although not quite closed-form.
M. A. Suchenek: Best-case Analysis of MergeSort (MS) v2
4
(a) pass the first b n2 c elements of A to a recursive call to MergeSort,
(b) pass the last d n2 e elements of A to another recursive call to MergeSort,
(c) linearly merge, by means of a call to Merge, the non-decreasingly
sorted arrays that were returned from those calls onto one nondecreasingly sorted array A0 ,
(d) return A0 to the caller.
A Java code of Merge is shown on the Figure 1.
Figure 1: A Java code of Merge, based on a pseudo-code from [Baa91]. Calls to Boolean
method Bcnt.incr() count the number of comps.
A typical measure of the running time of MergeSort is the number of
comparisons of keys, which for brevity I call comps, that it performs while
sorting array A. Since no comps are performed outside Merge, the running
time of MergeSort can be computed as the sum of numbers of comps performed by all calls to Merge during the execution of MergeSort. Since the
minimum number of comps performed by Merge on two list is equal to the
length of the shorter list, and any increasingly sorted array on any size N ≥ 2
produces only best-case scenarios for all subsequent calls to Merge, a rudimentary analysis of the recursion tree for MergeSort easily yields the exact
formula for the minimum number of comps for the entire MergeSort. The
problem arises when one tries to reduce the said formula, which naturally
involves long summations, to one that can be evaluated in a logarithmic
time.
M. A. Suchenek: Best-case Analysis of MergeSort (MS) v2
5
2.1. Recursion tree
The obvious recursion tree for MergeSort and sufficiently large n is shown
on Figure 2. A recursive application of the equality3
Figure 2: A sketch of the recursion 2-tree T for MergeSort for a sufficiently large n,
with levels shown on the left and the numbers of nodes shown on the right. The nodes
correspond to calls to MergeSort and show sizes of (sub)arrays passed to those calls. The
last level is h; it only contains nodes with value 1. The root corresponds to the original
call to MergeSort. If a call that is represented by a node p executes further recursive call
to MergeSort then these calls are represented by the children of p; otherwise p is a leaf.
n
n+1
d e=b
c
(1)
2
2
allows for rewriting of that tree onto one whose first four levels are shown on
Figure 3.
2.2. Best-case and its characterization B(n)
The best-case arrays of sizes b n2 c and d n2 e for Merge, where n ≥ 2, are
those in which every element of the first array is less than all elements of the
second one. In such a case, MergeSort performs b n2 c of comps.
3
It can be verified separately for odd and even values of n.
M. A. Suchenek: Best-case Analysis of MergeSort (MS) v2
6
Figure 3: The first four levels of the recursion 2-tree T from Figure 2, with the equality
(1) applied, recursively. The number of comparisons of keys performed in the best case by
Merge invoked in step 2c of Algorithm 2.1 as a result to a call to MergeSort corresponding
to a node of T is equal to the number that is shown in its left child, highlighted yellow.
k
All the right children at level k ≥ 1 of T show numbers of the form b 2n+i
k+1 c, where i ≥ 2 .
Thus all the left children (highlighted yellow) at level k ≥ 1 show numbers of the form
k
b 2n+i
k+1 c, where i < 2 .
Thus the following recurrence relation for the least number B(n) of comparisons of keys that MergeSort performs on any n-element array is straightforward to derive from its description given by Algorithm 2.1.
B(1) = 0,
(2)
and, for n ≥ 2,
n
n
n
B(n) = b c + B(b c) + B(d e).
2
2
2
Using the equality (1), the recurrence relation (3) is equivalent to:
n
n
n+1
B(n) = b c + B(b c) + B(b
c).
2
2
2
(3)
(4)
A graph of B(n) is shown on Figure 4.
Unfolding the recurrence (4) allows for noticing that the minimum number
B(n) of comps performed by all calls to Merge is equal to the sum of all values
shown at nodes highlighted yellow in the recursion tree T of Figure 3. They
may be summed-up level-by-level. One can notice from Figure 3 that the
M. A. Suchenek: Best-case Analysis of MergeSort (MS) v2
7
120
100
80
60
40
20
10
20
30
40
50
Figure 4: Graph of the solution B(n) of the recurrence (2) and (3).
number of comps performed at any level k with the maximal number 2k of
nodes is given by this formula:
k −1
2X
b
i=0
n+i
c.
2k+1
(5)
What is not clear is whether all levels of the recursion tree T are maximal.
Fortunately, the answer to this question does not depend on whether given
instance of MergeSort is running on a best-case array or on any other case
of array. It has been known form a classic analysis of the worst-case running
time of MergeSort that every level of its recursion tree T that contains at
least one non-leaf, or - in other words - a node that shows value p ≥ 2, is
maximal. Appendix A page 32 contains a detailed derivation of that fact.
Thus all levels 0 through h − 1 of T are maximal. Therefore, the formula (5)
gives the number of comps for every level 0 ≤ k ≤ h − 1.
The last level h of T may be not maximal because the level h − 1 may
contain leaves, or - in other words - nodes that show value p = 1, where
h−1
− 1, and as such do not have any children
p = b 2n+i
h−1 c for some 0 ≤ i ≤ 2
in level h. However, for each such node the value of b p2 c = b n+i
c is 0, so
2h
it can be included in summation (5) without affecting its value even though
the said value does not correspond to any node in level h. Therefore, the
formula (5) gives the number of comps for level k = h.
M. A. Suchenek: Best-case Analysis of MergeSort (MS) v2
8
Also, the depth of T is blg nc, as the Theorem Appendix A.0.2 page 35
in Appendix A states. Thus the minimum number of comps performed by
MergeSort is given by this formula:
blg nc 2k −1
X X n+i
b k+1 c.
2
k=0 i=0
(6)
Unfortunately, the summation (6) contains n−1 non-zero terms, so it cannot
be evaluated quickly in its present form. Fortunately, its inner summation
(5) can be reduced to a closed-form formula.
2.3. Zigzag function
In order to reduce (5) to a closed form, I am going to use function Zigzag
defined by:
Zigzag (n) = min(x − bxc, dxe − x).
(7)
The following fact is instrumental for that purpose.
Theorem 2.2. For every natural number n and every positive natural number
m,
m−1
2m−1
X n+i
X n+i
n
c−
b
c = 2m × Zigzag (
),
(8)
b
2m
2m
2m
i=0
i=m
where Zigzag is a function defined by (7) and visualized on Figure 5.
0.5
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
Figure 5: Graph of function Zigzag(x) = min(x − bxc, dxe − x).
Proof. The equality (8) can be verified experimentally, for instance, with a
help of software for symbolic computation4 . The analytic proof is deferred
to Section 7.
4
I used Wolfram Mathematica for that purpose.
M. A. Suchenek: Best-case Analysis of MergeSort (MS) v2
9
Corollary 2.3. For every natural number n and every positive natural number m,
m−1
X n+i
n
n
b
c = − m × Zigzag (
),
(9)
2m
2
2m
i=0
where Zigzag is a function defined by (7) and visualized on Figure 5.
Proof. First, let’s note5 that
2m−1
X
b
i=0
n+i
c = n.
2m
(10)
From (10) I conclude
m−1
X
2m−1
X n+i
n+i
b
c+
b
c = n.
2m
2m
i=0
i=m
Solving equations (8) and (11) for
Pm−1
i=0
(11)
b n+i
c yields (9).
2m
Here is the closed-form of the summation (5).
Corollary 2.4. For every natural number n and every natural number k,
k −1
2X
i=0
b
n
n
n+i
c = − 2k Zigzag ( k+1 ),
k+1
2
2
2
(12)
where Zigzag is a function defined by (7) and visualized on Figure 5.
Proof. Substitute m = 2k in (9).
The following theorem yields the formula (13) for the minimum number
B(n) of comps performed by MergeSort.
Theorem 2.5. For every natural number n,
blg nc 2k −1
blg nc
X X n+i
X
n
n
b k+1 c = (blg nc + 1) −
2k Zigzag ( k+1 ),
2
2
2
k=0 i=0
k=0
(13)
where Zigzag is a function defined by (7) and visualized on Figure 5.
5
Analytic proof of that fact is a straightforward exercise; see Appendix Appendix B
page 36.
M. A. Suchenek: Best-case Analysis of MergeSort (MS) v2
10
Proof.
blg nc 2k −1
blg nc
X X n+i
X n
n
b k+1 c =
( − 2k Zigzag ( k+1 )) =
2
2
2
k=0 i=0
k=0
blg nc
X
n
n
2k Zigzag ( k+1 ).
= (blg nc + 1) −
2
2
k=0
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
10
20
30
40
50
Pblg nc P2k −1 n+i
n
Figure 6: Graphs of functions
i=0 b 2k+1 c (bottom line) and 2 (blg nc + 1) −
k=0
Pblg nc k
n
k=0 2 Zigzag ( 2k+1 ) (top line) of equality (13). They coincide with each other for all
natural numbers n.
Formula (13), although not quite closed-form, comprises of summation
with only blg nc + 1 closed-form terms, so it may be evaluated in O(logc )
time, where c is a constant. I will show in Section 3 that (13) does not have
a closed form. Graphs of both sides of equality (13) are shown on Figure 6.
Once can see that for natural numbers n they coincide with the solution B(n)
of recurrences (2) and (3) visualized on Figure 4.
Corollary 2.6. For every natural number n, the minimum number B(n) of
comps that MergeSort performs while sorting an n-element array is:
blg nc
X
n
n
2k Zigzag ( k+1 ),
B(n) = (blg nc + 1) −
2
2
k=0
where Zigzag is a function defined by (7) and visualized on Figure 5.
(14)
M. A. Suchenek: Best-case Analysis of MergeSort (MS) v2
11
3. A fractal in B(n)
A deceitfully simple expression
blg xc
X
2k+1 Zigzag (
k=0
x
2k+1
),
(15)
half of which occurs in formula (14) of Corollary 2.6, is a formidable adversary
for those who may try to turn it into a closed form, although the time required
for its evaluation for any given n is O(logc ) 6 . That does not come as a
surprise, taking into account that its graph, shown on Figure 7, bears a
resemblance of fractal. This can be easily seen as soon as a sawtooth function
2blg xc+1 − x is subtracted from it, yielding the function F (x) given by
blg xc
F (x) =
X
2k+1 Zigzag (
k=0
x
2k+1
) − 2blg xc+1 + x.
(16)
40
30
20
10
0
10
Figure 7: A graph of function
tion 2blg xc+1 − x.
Since
1
2
≤
x
2blg xc+1
20
Pblg xc
k=0
40
50
60
x
2k+1 Zigzag ( 2k+1
) plotted against a sawtooth func-
< 1, equality (7) implies
Zigzag (
6
30
x
x
)
=
1
−
,
2blg xc+1
2blg xc+1
So, to all practical purposes, (14) is a closed-form formula.
M. A. Suchenek: Best-case Analysis of MergeSort (MS) v2
or
2blg xc+1 Zigzag (
x
2blg xc+1
12
) = 2blg xc+1 − x.
(17)
The equality (17) simplifies definition (16) of function F to
blg xc
F (x) =
X
2k Zigzag (
k=1
x
),
2k
(18)
visualized on Figure 8.
30
25
20
15
10
5
10
20
30
40
50
60
Pblg xc
Figure 8: A graph of function F (x) = k=1 2k Zigzag ( 2xk ) plotted below its tight linear
x−1
1 k+1
upper bound y = x−1
+(−1)k ) for
2 (if can be shown that F (x) = 2 whenever x = 3 (2
x
k
some integer k ≥ 0); also shown below F (x) are the terms 2 Zigzag ( 2k ) of the summation
and their tight linear upper bound y = x3 .
The function F is a fractal with quasi similarity that repeats at intervals
of exponentially growing length. It is a union
F =
∞
[
fk
(19)
k=0
of functions fk , each having an interval [2k , 2k+1 ) as its domain. In other
words, for every integer k ≥ 0,
fk = F [2k , 2k+1 ),
which, of course, yields (19).
(20)
M. A. Suchenek: Best-case Analysis of MergeSort (MS) v2
13
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
-0.2
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
Figure 9: A graph of the first six (the
P∞first 1one is2 0) normalized parts of function of
Figure 8 plotted against the line y = i=0 22i+1
= 3 . Also shown (in blue) are the first
five terms 21i Zigzag (2i x), i = 0, ..., 4, of sums that occur in the formula (24) for f˜k (x); for
each integer n and all x ∈ [n, n + 1), their parts above the X-axis restricted to [n, n + 1)
visualize a fragment of an infinite binary search trie T defined as the set of shortest binary
expansions of x − bxc with the last digit 1 (if the said binary expansion is finite) being
interpreted as the sequence terminator; in particular, the root of T is .1, and if a is a finite
binary sequence then the children of binary expansion .a1 are .a01 and .a11 .
Let fˆk be the normalized fk on interval [0, 1), defined by:
1
fˆk (x) = k fk (2k (x + 1)),
2
(21)
and f˜k be the periodized fˆk by composing it with a sawtooth function x−bxc,7
defined by:
f˜k (x) = fˆk (x − bxc).
(22)
Contracting definitions (20), (21), and (22), yields
1
f˜k (x) = k F (2k (x − bxc + 1)).
2
(23)
One can compute8 from (23) the following alternative formula for f˜k (x):
f˜k (x) =
7
8
k−1
X
1
Zigzag (2i x).
i
2
i=0
(24)
The fractional part of x.
An elementary geometric argument based on the graph visualized on Figure 9 will do.
M. A. Suchenek: Best-case Analysis of MergeSort (MS) v2
14
Figure 9 shows functions f˜0 , ..., f˜6 drawn on the same graph.
Since each function fk , and - therefore - each function fˆk , and - therefore each function f˜k , are a result of smaller and smaller triangles piled, originating
in function Zigzag of definition (18) of function F , on one another as shown
on Figure 9, for any integers 0 ≤ i < j, f˜i linearly interpolates f˜j . Because
of that, each f˜i linearly interpolates the limit F̃ of all f˜k s defined by:
F̃ (x) = lim f˜k (x),
(25)
k→∞
as Figure 10 illustrates. An application of (24) to (25) yields:
∞
X
1
Zigzag (2i x).
F̃ (x) =
i
2
i=0
(26)
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
-0.2
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
Figure 10: Functions functions f˜0 (x), f˜1 (x), ... and their limit (the topmost curve) F̃ (x)
given by (26). Collapsing the Zigzag(x) would yield the same, albeit scaled-down (by the
factor of 2) pattern 21 F̃ (2x), as (26) does imply.
Since for every integer n and i ≥ k, 2i 2nk is integer, Zigzag (2i 2nk ) = 0.
Therefore, by virtue of (24) and (26), for every non-negative integer k and
n,
n
n
F̃ ( k ) = f˜k ( k ).
(27)
2
2
This and (24) eliminate the need for infinite summation9 while computing
F̃ ( 2nk ).
9
As it appears in (26)
M. A. Suchenek: Best-case Analysis of MergeSort (MS) v2
15
It can be shown that although a continuous function, F̃ is nowheredifferentiable. As such, it does not have a closed-form formula as any closedform formula on a real interval must define a function have a derivative at
every point of that interval, except for a non-dense set of its points. Since F̃
can be expressed in function, described by a closed-form formula, of the righthand side of formula (13), the latter does not have a closed-form formula,
either.
Theorem 3.1. There is no closed-form formula ϕ(n) the values of which
Pblg nc
n
coincide with k=0 2k Zigzag ( 2k+1
), for all positive integers n, that is, for
every closed-form formula ϕ(n) on function Zigzag there is a positive n such
that
blg nc
X
n
(28)
2k Zigzag ( k+1 ) 6= ϕ(n),
2
k=0
where Zigzag is a function defined by (7) and visualized on Figure 5.
Proof. Follows from the above discussion. A more detailed proof is deferred
to Section 8.
This way I arrived at the following conclusion.
Corollary 3.2. There is no closed-form formula for B(n).
Proof. A closed-form formula for B(n) would, by virtue of (14) page 10, yield
Pblg nc
n
a closed-form formula for k=0 2k Zigzag ( 2k+1
), which by Theorem 3.1 does
not exist.
Note. One can apply the reverse transformations to those used in Section 3 on function F̃ and construct a fractal function F̆ , shown on Figure 11,
given by the equation
x
F̆ (x) = 2blg xc F̃ ( blg xc ),
(29)
2
that for every positive integer n satisfies
F̆ (n) = F (n),
where F is given by (18).
(30)
M. A. Suchenek: Best-case Analysis of MergeSort (MS) v2
16
20
15
10
5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Figure 11: A graph of function F̆ (x) = 2blg xc F̃ ( 2blgx xc ) plotted above a graph of the
Pblg xc
function F (x) = k=1 2k Zigzag ( 2xk ).
4. Computing F̃ (x) and B(n) from one another
Computing values of function F̃ (x) does not have to be as complex as (or
more complex than) the definition (26) implies. Of course, for every integer
n, F̃ (n) = 0. One can apply some elementary arguments based on a structure
visualized on Figure 10 to conclude that
2
1
2
F̃ ( ) = F̃ ( ) = ,
3
3
3
(31)
(the latter being the maximum of F̃ (x)) or that for every positive integer k,
F̃ (
k
1
) = k.
k
2
2
(32)
It takes a bit more work to compute
F̃ (
3
3k − 4
)=
.
k
2
2k
(33)
It turns out that computing values of function F̃ (x) for every x that has
a finite binary expansion can be done easily if an oracle for computing the
values of the function B(n) defined by (2) and (3) is given10 . Once that is
accomplished, since F̃ (x) is a continuous function and the set of numbers
with finite binary expansions is dense in the set R of reals, it allows for fast
approximations of F̃ (x) for every real x. 11
10
11
Which is not that surprising after a glance at Figure 11.
It helps to remember that F̃ is a periodic function with F̃ (x) = F̃ (x − bxc).
M. A. Suchenek: Best-case Analysis of MergeSort (MS) v2
Theorem 4.1. For every positive integer n
12
17
and integer k with n ≤ 2k ,
n
n × k − 2B(n)
)=
.
(34)
k
2
2k
Proof. The equality (34) can be verified experimentally, for instance, with a
help of software for symbolic computation4 . The analytic proof is deferred
to Section 9.
F̃ (
Theorem 4.1 allows for easy computing of B(n) if F̃ ( 2nk ) is given for some
k ≥ lg n using this form of (34):
Corollary 4.2. For every positive integer n and integer k with n ≤ 2k ,
n×k
n
B(n) =
− 2k−1 F̃ ( k ).
(35)
2
2
Proof. An obvious conclusion from (34).
For instance, putting k = blg nc + 1 in (35) easily yields (14). For k =
dlg ne we obtain
B(n) =
n
ndlg ne
− 2dlg ne−1 F̃ ( dlg ne ) =
2
2
[by (26)]
∞
X 1
ndlg ne
n
=
− 2dlg ne−1
Zigzag (2i dlg ne ) =
i
2
2
2
i=0
[since for i ≥ dlg ne, 2i 2dlgn ne is integer and Zigzag (2i 2dlgn ne ) = 0]
dlg ne−1
X 1
ndlg ne
n
dlg ne−1
=
−2
Zigzag (2i dlg ne ) =
i
2
2
2
i=0
dlg ne−1
n
ndlg ne 1 X dlg ne−i
−
2
Zigzag ( dlg ne−i ).
=
2
2 i=0
2
Substituting k for dlg ne − i we conclude
dlg ne
ndlg ne 1 X k
n
2 Zigzag ( k ),
B(n) =
−
2
2 k=1
2
a similar to (14) characterization of B(n).
12
Of course, one if free to assume that n is odd here.
(36)
M. A. Suchenek: Best-case Analysis of MergeSort (MS) v2
18
5. Relationship between the best case and the worst case
A casual student of MergeSort tends to believe that its worst-case behavior is about twice as bad as its best-case behavior. This, of course, is
only approximately true. In this Section, I will derive the exact difference
between 2B(n) and W (n) using function F defined by (16) page 11.
An exact formula for the number W (n) of comparisons of keys performed
by MergeSort in the worst case is known13 and is given for any positive
integer n by the following equality:
n
X
W (n) =
dlg ie.
(37)
i=1
From (14) and (16), one can derive
2B(n) = nblg nc − 2blg nc+1 + 2n − F (n) =
[by
Pn
i=1 dlg ie
= nblg nc − 2blg nc+1 + n + 1 from [Knu97]]
=
n
X
dlg ie − 1 + n − F (n) =
i=1
[by (37)]
= W (n) − 1 + n − F (n).
The above yield the following characterization.
Theorem 5.1. For every positive integer n, the difference between twice the
number B(n) of comparison of keys performed in the best case and the number
W (n) of comparison of keys performed in the worst case by MergeSort while
sorting an n-element array is:
2B(n) − W (n) = n − 1 − F (n),
where F (n), visualized on Figure 8, is given by (18).
Proof. Follows from the above discussion.
13
See (A.7) in the Appendix A.
(38)
M. A. Suchenek: Best-case Analysis of MergeSort (MS) v2
19
In particular, since for every positive integer n,
0 ≤ F (n) ≤
n−1
2
(39)
(see Figure 8 for explanation), I conclude with the following tight linear
bounds on 2B(n) − W (n).
Corollary 5.2. For every positive integer n, the difference between twice the
minimum number B(n) and the maximum number W (n) of comparison of
keys performed in the worst case by MergeSort while sorting an n-element
array satisfies this inequality:
n−1
≤ 2B(n) − W (n) ≤ n − 1.
2
(40)
Proof. Follows from (38) and (39).
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Figure 12: A graph of 2B(n) − W (n) shown between graphs of its tight linear bounds
n − 1 and n−1
2 .
Obviously, 2B(n) − W (n) = n − 1 whenever F (n) = 0, that is, whenever
n = 2blg nc . It can be shown that 2B(n) − W (n) = n−1
whenever n =
2
1 k+1
k
(2
+
(−1)
)
for
some
integer
k
≥
0.
3
A graph of 2B(n) − W (n) and its tight bounds are shown on Figure 12.
M. A. Suchenek: Best-case Analysis of MergeSort (MS) v2
20
6. The sum of digits problem
A known explicit formula, published in [Tro68], for the total number of
bits in all integers between 0 and n (not including 0 and n) is expressed in
terms of function Zigzag (referred to as 2g in [Tro68]) and is given by:14
Let g(x) be periodic of period 1 and defined on [0, 1] by
It has been shown in [McI74] that the recurrence relation for A(n, 2) is the
same as the recurrence relation for B(n) given by (2) and (3). Therefore, the
formula (13) derived in this paper is equivalent to A(n, 2) given above by the
considerably more complicated definition. Interestingly, the above definition
can be simplified to (13) along the lines of the elementary derivation of the
alternative formula (36) for B(n) on page 1715 .
7. Proof of Theorem 2.2 page 8, Subsection 2.3
In this Section, I provide an analytic proof of the experimentally-derived
Theorem 2.2 page 8, Subsection 2.3 that was instrumental for the derivation
of a logarithmic-length formula16 for B(n). The result and its proof have a
14
The following are screen shots and an excerpt from [Tro68].
Even more interestingly, if someone did bother to simplify Trollope’s formula of [Tro68]
then I am not aware of it.
Pblg nc
n
16
B(n) = n2 (blg nc + 1) − k=0 2k Zigzag ( 2k+1
), where Zigzag (x) = min(x − bxc, dxe −
x).
15
M. A. Suchenek: Best-case Analysis of MergeSort (MS) v2
21
flavor of Concrete Mathematics. Although they are interesting in their own
right, they cannot be found in [RGP94].
Theorem 7.1. (Same as Theorem 2.2.) For every natural number n and
every positive natural number m,
2m−1
X
m−1
X n+i
n+i
n
b
c−
b
c = 2m × Zigzag (
),
2m
2m
2m
i=m
i=0
(41)
where Zigzag is a function defined by (7) and visualized on Figure 5 page 8.
Proof. First, let’s note that
m−1
m−1
m−1
X n + i + m m−1
X n+i
X n+i 1
n+i
n+i X n+i
c−
b
c=
b
c−
b
c=
(b
+ c−b
c),
b
2m
2m
2m
2m
2m 2
2m
i=0
i=0
i=0
i=0
i=m
2m−1
X
that is,
2m−1
X
b
i=m
m−1
m−1
X n+i
X n+i 1
n+i
n+i
c−
b
c=
(b
+ c−b
c).
2m
2m
2m
2
2m
i=0
i=0
(42)
Let
n = k × 2m + r,
(43)
where 0 ≤ r < 2m, and let 0 ≤ i < m. We have
b
k × 2m + r + i 1
r+i 1
n+i 1
+ c=b
+ c=k+b
+ c
2m
2
2m
2
2m
2
and
n+i
k × 2m + r + i
r+i
c=b
c=k+b
c.
2m
2m
2m
Thus, by virtue of (42),
b
2m−1
X
m−1
m−1
X n+i
X r+i 1
n+i
r+i
b
c−
b
c=
(b
+ c−b
c).
2m
2m
2m
2
2m
i=m
i=0
i=0
We have
1 if
r+i 1
r+i
b
+ c−b
c=
2m
2
2m
1
2
≤
r+i
2m
0 otherwise,
(44)
<1
(45)
M. A. Suchenek: Best-case Analysis of MergeSort (MS) v2
because r+i
+ 21 <
2m
r+i
1
c − b 2m c ≤ 1.
2
3m
2m
+
1
2
22
= 2 so that b r+i
+ 12 c ≤ 1 and, therefore, b r+i
+
2m
2m
Let I be defined as
I = {i ∈ N |
1
r+i
≤
< 1} = {i ∈ N | m − r ≤ i < 2m − r}.
2
2m
(46)
By virtue of (45), we have
m−1
X
i=0
(b
X r+i 1
X
r+i 1
r+i
r+i
+ c−b
c) =
(b
+ c−b
c) =
1 = #I, (47)
2m 2
2m
2m 2
2m
i∈I
i∈I
where #(I) denotes the cardinality of I.
If r ≤ m then, by (46), #I = m − (m − r) = r. If r > m then, by (46),
#I = 2m − r. In any case,
#I = min(r, 2m − r) = 2m min(
[since 0 ≤
r
2m
r
r
,1 −
)=
2m
2m
< 1 so that b r+i
c = 0 and d r+i
e = 1]
2m
2m
= 2m min(
r
r
r
r
−b
c, d
e−
)=
2m
2m
2m
2m
[by the definition (7) of function Zigzag]
= 2m × Zigzag (
r
)=
2m
[since Zigzag is a periodic function with period 1]
= 2m × Zigzag (k +
r
k × 2m + r
) = 2m × Zigzag (
)=
2m
2m
[by (43)]
= 2m × Zigzag (
n
).
2m
Thus
n
).
2m
From (42), (44), (47), and (48), I conclude (41).
#I = 2m × Zigzag (
(48)
M. A. Suchenek: Best-case Analysis of MergeSort (MS) v2
23
8. Proof of Theorem 3.1 page 15, Section 3
In this Section, I present a brief discussion/motivation of what can be
generally considered a closed-form formula for a function from the set of
real numbers into a set of real numbers. I provide an analytic proof of
Theorem 3.1 page 15, Section 3 that implies the non-existence of closed-form
formula for the minimum number B(n) of comparisons of keys by MergeSort
while sorting an n-element array. I am going to use the acronym cff as an
abbreviation for closed-form formula.
For reader’s convenience, the Theorem 3.1 is quoted below as Theorem 8.1.
Theorem 8.1. (Same as Theorem 3.1.) There is no cff ϕ(n) the values of
Pblg nc
n
), for all positive integers n, that is,
which coincide with k=0 2k Zigzag ( 2k+1
for every cff ϕ(n) on function Zigzag there is a positive n such that
blg nc
X
2k Zigzag (
k=0
n
2k+1
) 6= ϕ(n),
(49)
where Zigzag is a function defined by (7) and visualized on Figure 5.
The rest of this Section constitutes the proof of Theorem 8.1.
First, let me use an example of function 2x : R −→ R as an insight of
what may be accepted as a cff for a continuous function - like, say, F̃ (x) on the set R of reals or on an interval thereof. One picks a dense17 subset Q
of R, with a collection of mappings ρx (i) : N −→ Q, where x ∈ R, given by
so that limi→∞ ρx (i) = x. Since for any x ∈ R \ Q, 2x has been
ρx (i) = bi×xc
i
defined as
√
i
(50)
2x = lim 2ρx (i) = lim 2bi×xc ,
i→∞
i→∞
√
i
limi→∞ 2bi×xc is considered a cff α : R −→ R for 2x .
Lemma 8.2. For every positive integer n,
F̃ (
17
n
)=
2blg nc
In the metric topology of R.
n(blg nc + 2) − 2B(n)
− 2,
2blg nc
(51)
M. A. Suchenek: Best-case Analysis of MergeSort (MS) v2
24
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
-0.2
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Figure 13: A graph of the Blancmange function F̃ (x) =
1.0
1.2
P∞
1
i
i=0 2i Zigzag(2 x).
where the function F has been defined by the equality (16) page 11, the function F̃ , visualized on Figure 13 18 , has been defined by the equality (26)
page 14, and the function B(n) has been defined by the equations (2) and (4)
page 6.
Proof. From (16) page 11, I compute
blg nc
X
2i+1 Zigzag (
i=0
n
2i+1
) = F (n) + 2blg nc+1 − n,
that is,
blg nc
X
2i Zigzag (
i=0
1
n
blg nc
)
=
F
(n)
+
2
−
.
2i+1
2
2
n
Applying (52) to the equality (14) page 10, I conclude
B(n) =
n
1
n
(blg nc + 1) − ( F (n) + 2blg nc − ),
2
2
2
or
B(n) =
n
1
n
(blg nc + 1) − F (n) − 2blg nc + ,
2
2
2
that is,
1
n
n
F (n) = (blg nc + 1) − B(n) − 2blg nc + ,
2
2
2
18
Also, together with its partial sums, on Figure 10, page 14.
(52)
M. A. Suchenek: Best-case Analysis of MergeSort (MS) v2
25
or
F (n) = n(blg nc + 2) − 2B(n) − 2blg nc+1 .
(53)
On the other hand, by virtue of (18) page 12,
blg nc
X
F (n) =
i=1
n
2i Zigzag ( i ) =
2
[putting j = blg nc − i]
blg nc−1
=
X
blg nc−j
2
Zigzag (
j=0
[since for j ≥ blg nc,
2j n
2blg nc
n
2blg nc−j
blg nc−1
blg nc
)=2
X
j=0
1
2j n
Zigzag ( blg nc ) =
2j
2
j
2 n
∈ N so that Zigzag ( 2blg
nc ) = 0]
blg nc
=2
∞
X
2j n
1
Zigzag
(
)=
2j
2blg nc
j=0
[by (26) page 14]
2blg nc F̃ (
n
2blg nc
Thus,
F (n) = 2blg nc F̃ (
or
).
n
2blg nc
)
1
)
=
F (n).
2blg nc
2blg nc
Combining equalities (53) and (55) yields
F̃ (
F̃ (
n
2blg nc
)=
1
2blg nc
n
(54)
(55)
(n(blg nc + 2) − 2B(n) − 2blg nc+1 ),
or (51).
Lemma 8.3. If the function B(n) defined by the equations (2) and (4) has a
cff β : N −→ N then the function F̃ (x) defined by the equation (26) page 14
has a cff ϕ : [1, 2) −→ [0, 32 ].
M. A. Suchenek: Best-case Analysis of MergeSort (MS) v2
Proof. Let
D={
n
2blg nc
26
| n ∈ N}
(56)
be the set of rationals in the interval [1, 2) with finite binary expansions19 ,
enumerated by ν(n) : N −→ D given by ν(n) = 2blgn nc and visualized on
Figure 14.
2.0
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
1.0
0
500
1000
Figure 14: A graph of enumeration ν(n) =
1500
n
2blg nc
2000
of the set D.
D is a dense subset of the interval [1, 2) of reals. Indeed, if x ∈ [1, 2) then
n
for every n ∈ N, b22nxc ∈ D and
b2n xc
lim
= x.
n→∞ 2n
(57)
Hence, for any x ∈ [1, 2), putting
n = b2i xc,
(58)
so that
blg nc = blgb2i xcc = blg 2i xc = bi + lg xc = i + blg xc = i
19
It is a trivial exercise to show that every real number with finite binary expansion in
the interval [1, 2) is of the form 2blgn nc for some n ∈ N, and it is obvious that every real
number of that form has a finite binary expansion and falls into that interval.
M. A. Suchenek: Best-case Analysis of MergeSort (MS) v2
27
[the last equality holds because 1 ≤ x < 2 so that 0 ≤ lg x < 1 and blg xc =
0], or
blg nc = i,
(59)
we conclude, by virtue of (57),
b2i xc
)=
i→∞ 2i
F̃ (x) = F̃ ( lim
[by the continuity of F̃ (x)]
= lim F̃ (
i→∞
b2i xc
)=
2i
[by the equality (51) of Lemma 8.2]
b2i xc
b2i xc(i + 2) − 2B(b2i xc)
ib2i xc − 2B(b2i xc)
−2
=
lim
+
lim
2
−2 =
i→∞
i→∞
i→∞
2i
2i
2i
= lim
[by the equality (57)]
ib2i xc − 2B(b2i xc)
+ 2x − 2.
i→∞
2i
lim
Thus, for any x ∈ [1, 2),
ib2i xc − 2B(b2i xc)
+ 2x − 2.
i→∞
2i
F̃ (x) = lim
(60)
The equality (60) shows that if there is a cff β : N −→ N for function B
defined by the equations (2) and (4) page 6 then there is a cff ϕ : [1, 2) −→
[0, 23 ] given by
ib2i xc − 2β(b2i xc)
lim
+ 2x − 2
i→∞
2i
for F̃ (x). This completes the proof of Lemma 8.3.
Should the nowhere-differentiable function F̃ have a cff , it would be differentiable everywhere except, perhaps, on a non-dense subset of R. The
following inductive argument demonstrates that. All atomic cff s are differentiable except, perhaps, on a non-dense subset of R. If a finite number of
cff s are differentiable except, perhaps, on non-dense subsets of R then their
M. A. Suchenek: Best-case Analysis of MergeSort (MS) v2
28
composition is differentiable except, perhaps, on non-dense subsets of R.
Thus F̃ has no cff .
20
The above observation, together with Lemma 8.3, complete the proof of
Theorem 8.1.
9. Proof of Theorem 4.1 page 17, Section 4
In this Section, I provide an analytic proof of experimentally-derived Theorem 4.1 page 17, Section 4. This result, re-stated by Theorem 9.1 below,
allows for practically efficient computations of values of the continuous Blackmange function for reals with finite binary floating-point representations. I
also provide some properties (Lammas 9.2, 9.3, and 9.4) of the Zigzag function, given by the equality (7) page 8 and visualized on Figure 5 page 8, that
are useful for a neat derivation of a formula for the Blancmange function as
(the limit of) a finite sum of some values of the Zigzag function.
Let the function21 F̃ , visualized on Figure 13 page 24, be defined by (26)
page 14, and B(n), given by (2) and (4) page 6, be the least number of
comparisons of keys that MergeSort performs while sorting an n-element
array.
Theorem 9.1. (Same as Theorem 4.1.) For every positive integer n
integer k with n ≤ 2k ,
F̃ (
n × k − 2B(n)
n
)
=
.
2k
2k
22
and
(61)
The reminder of this Section constitutes a proof of Theorem 9.1.
Note. Function Zigzag, visualized on Figure 5 page 8, has been defined
by (7) page 8.
Lemma 9.2. For every k ≥ blg nc + 2,
2k Zigzag(
n
) = n.
2k
(62)
√
For instance, function xZigzag( x1 ) is differentiable on [0, 1], except for the non-dense
set {0} ∪ { n1 | n ∈ N}.
21
Known as the Blancmange function.
22
Of course, one if free to assume that n is odd here.
20
M. A. Suchenek: Best-case Analysis of MergeSort (MS) v2
29
Proof. Let k ≥ blg nc + 2, or 2k ≥ 2 × 2blg nc+1 > 2n, that is
2k > 2n.
We have:
0≤b
(63)
n
c≤
2k
[by (63)]
≤b
1
n
c=b c=0
2n
2
or
b
n
c = 0.
2k
Also,
1≤d
(64)
n
e≤
2k
[by (63)]
≤d
n
1
e=d e=1
2n
2
or
d
n
e = 1.
2k
Now,
2k Zigzag(
(65)
n
)=
2k
[by (7) page 8]
= 2k min{
n
n
n
n
n
n
− b k c, d k e − k } = min{n − 2k b k c, 2k d k e − n} =
k
2
2
2
2
2
2
[by (64) and (65)]
= min{n, 2k − n} =
[since by (63), 2k − n ≥ n]
= n.
Hence, (62) holds.
Lemma 9.3. For every k ≥ blg nc + 1,
k
X
i=blg nc+2
n
2i Zigzag( i ) = n × k − n(blg nc + 1).
2
(66)
M. A. Suchenek: Best-case Analysis of MergeSort (MS) v2
30
Proof. By induction on k.
Basis step: k = blg nc + 1.
blg nc+1
X
L=
i=blg nc+2
n
2i Zigzag( i ) = 0.
2
R = n(blg nc + 1) − n(blg nc + 1) = 0.
Hence, L = R. This completes the Basis step.
Inductive step: k ≥ blg nc + 2.
Inductive hypothesis: (66).
k+1
X
i=blg nc+2
n
2i Zigzag( i ) =
2
k
X
i=blg nc+2
n
n
2i Zigzag( i ) + 2k Zigzag( k ) =
2
2
[by the Inductive hypothesis and by the equality (62) of Lemma 9.2]
= n × k − n(blg nc + 1) + n = n × (k + 1) − n(blg nc + 1).
Thus
k+1
X
i=blg nc+2
n
2i Zigzag( i ) = n × (k + 1) − n(blg nc + 1).
2
This completes the Inductive step.
Lemma 9.4. For every k ≥ blg nc + 1,
k
X
n
n
2 F̃ ( k ) =
2i Zigzag( i ).
2
2
i=1
k
Proof. By the definition (26) page 14 of function F̃ , we get:
∞
X 1
n
n
2 F̃ ( k ) = 2k
Zigzag(2i k ) =
i
2
2
2
i=0
k
(67)
M. A. Suchenek: Best-case Analysis of MergeSort (MS) v2
31
[since for every integer x, Zigzag(x) = 0, so that for i ≥ k, Zigzag(2i 2nk ) = 0]
= 2k
k−1
k−1
X
X
1
n
i n
Zigzag(2
)
=
2k−i Zigzag( k−i ) =
i
k
2
2
2
i=0
i=0
[putting j = k − i]
=
k
X
2j Zigzag(
j=1
n
),
2j
which completes the proof of (67).
At this point, we are ready to conclude the proof of Theorem 4.1.
By virtue of (14) page 10, we have:
blg nc
2B(n) = n(blg nc + 1) −
X
2k+1 Zigzag(
k=0
blg nc+1
= n(blg nc + 1) −
X
i=1
= n(blg nc + 1) −
k
X
i=1
n
2k+1
)=
n
2i Zigzag( i ) =
2
n
2 Zigzag( i ) +
2
k
X
i
i=blg nc+2
n
2i Zigzag( i ) =
2
[by Lemmas 9.3 and 9.4]
= n(blg nc + 1) − 2k F̃ (
n
n
) + n × k − n(blg nc + 1) = n × k − 2k F̃ ( k ),
k
2
2
that is,
2B(n) = n × k − 2k F̃ (
n
),
2k
from which (62) follows.
This completes the proof of Theorem 4.1.
Note. A glance at the proof of Lemma 9.3 suffices to notice that it fails if
n > 2k , and so does Theorem 4.1. In particular, for k = blg nc, Lemma 8.2
page 23 yields
n
n × k − 2B(n) 2n
n × k − 2B(n)
)=
+ k −2>
k
k
2
2
2
2k
2n
since for n > 2blg nc , 2blg
nc − 2 > 0.
F̃ (
(68)
M. A. Suchenek: Best-case Analysis of MergeSort (MS) v2
32
References
[Baa91] Sara Baase. Computer Algorithms: Introduction to Design and
Analysis. Addison-Wesley Publishing, 2nd edition, 1991.
[Knu97] Donald E. Knuth. The Art of Computer Programming, volume 3.
Addison-Wesley Publishing, 2nd edition, 1997.
[McI74] M. D. McIlroy. The number of 1’s in binary integers: Bounds and
extremal properties. SIAM Journal of Computing, 3(4):255–261,
December 1974.
[RGP94] Donald Knuth Ronald Graham and Oren Patashnik.
Concrete Mathematics: A Foundation for Computer Science. Addison–Wesley, 1994.
[SF13] Robert Sedgewick and Philippe Flajolet. An Introduction to the
Analysis of Algorithms. Pearson, 2013.
[Suc16] Marek A. Suchenek.
Best-case analysis of MergeSort
with an application to the sum of digits problem (MS).
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1607.04604v1, July 18 2016.
[Tro68] J. R. Trollope. An explicit expression for binary digital sums. Mathematics Magazine, 41(1):21–25, Jan.–Feb. 1968.
APPENDIX
Appendix A. P
A derivation of the worst-case running time W (n) =
n
i=1 dlg ie of MergeSort
Let’s assume that n ≥ 2 is large enough to spur a cascade of many
recursive calls to MergeSort following the recursion tree T , a sketch of which
is shown on Figure 2.
The nodes in tree T correspond to calls to MergeSort and show sizes
of (sub)arrays passed to those calls. The root corresponds to the original
call to MergeSort. If a call that is represented by a node p executes further
M. A. Suchenek: Best-case Analysis of MergeSort (MS) v2
33
recursive calls to MergeSort then these calls are represented by the children
of p; otherwise p is a leaf. Thus, T is a 2-tree23 .
The levels in tree T are enumerated from 0 to h, where h is the number
of the last level of the tree, or - in other words - the depth of T . On Figure 2,
they are shown on the left side of the tree. The root is at the level 0, its
children are at level 1, its grand children are at level 2, its great grand children
(not shown on the sketch) are at level 3, at so on. Clearly, since every call
to MergeSort on a sub-array of size ≥ 2 executes two further recursive calls
to MergeSort, only the nodes that show value 1 are leaves and all other
nodes have 2 children each. Thus, since all nodes in the last level h are
leaves, they all show value 1. And since the original input array gets split,
eventually, onto n 1-element sub-arrays, the number of all leaves in T is n.
(This, however, does not mean that the last level h necessarily contains all
the leaves of T .)
If a level i has 2i nodes, each of them showing a value ≥ 2, then each
such node has 2 children so that level i + 1 has twice the number of nodes in
level i, that is, 2i+1 nodes. Since level 0 has 20 nodes, it follows (completion
of a proof by induction with the basis and inductive steps outlined above is
left as an exercise for the reader) that if k is the level number of any level
above which all the nodes show values ≥ 2 then all levels i = 0, ...k contain
exactly 2i nodes each.
The last level h may contain 2h nodes or less. We are going to show
that each level i above level h contains exactly 2i nodes. Here is a very
insightful property that we are going to use for that purpose. It states that
MergeSort is splitting its input array fairly evenly so that at any level of the
recursive tree, the difference between the lengths of the longest sub-array and
the shortest sub-array is ≤ 1. This fact is the root cause of good worst-case
performance of MergeSort.
Property Appendix A.0.1. The difference between values shown by any
two nodes in the same level of the recursion tree for MergeSort is ≤ 1.
Proof. The Property clearly holds for level 0. We will show that if it holds
for level i and i is not the last level of the recursion tree (that is, i < h) then
it also holds for the level i + 1.
23
A binary tree whose every non-leaf has exactly 2 children.
M. A. Suchenek: Best-case Analysis of MergeSort (MS) v2
34
Let us assume that the Property holds for some level i < h. Let c ≤ d be
numbers shown by any two (not necessarily distinct) nodes in level i + 1. It
suffices to show that
d − c ≤ 1.
(A.1)
Let a ≤ b be the numbers shown by the parents of the mentioned above
nodes. Those parents, of course, must reside in the level i. By the inductive
hypothesis (that holds for level i), b − a ≤ 1, that is,
a ≤ b ≤ a + 1.
(A.2)
The numbers shown by all their four children are b a2 c, d a2 e, b 2b c and d 2b e,
respectively, so the largest difference between any of those four numbers is
d 2b e − b a2 c. In particular, d − c is not larger than that. We have:
b
a
d−c≤d e−b c≤
2
2
[by (A.2)]
a
a+1
e−b c
2
2
c
c+1
[since for any integer c, d 2 e = b 2 c]
≤d
=b
a+2
a
a
a
c − b c = b + 1c − b c =
2
2
2
2
[since for every x, bx + 1c = bxc + 1]
a
a
= b c + 1 − b c = 1.
2
2
Thus (A.1) holds. This completes the inductive step and completes the proof
of the Property.
As we have noted, the values shown at all nodes in the last level h are all
1. Thus the values shown at their parents, that reside at level h − 1 are all 2,
and the values shown at their grand parents, that reside at level h − 2 are all
≥ 3. Thus, by Property Appendix A.0.1, all nodes at level h − 2 show values
≥ 2, and, therefore (as we have proved before), all levels i = 0, ..., h − 1 have
2i nodes, each, as it has been visualized on Figure 2.
M. A. Suchenek: Best-case Analysis of MergeSort (MS) v2
35
Theorem Appendix A.0.2. The depth h of the recursion tree T (n) for
MergeSort run on an array of size n is
h = dlg ne.
(A.3)
Proof. Since every level of T , except, perhaps, for the last level, has the
maximal number of nodes, a 2-tree with n leaves could not be any shorter
than T . So, T is a shortest 2-tree with n leaves. Therefore (by a well known
fact), its depth h is equal to dlg ne. Thus (A.3) holds.
Because each node in any level above h − 1 shows value ≥ 2, it has 2
children. Thus the value it shows is equal to the sum of values shown by its
children, as we have indicated at the beginning of this section. From that
we conclude (a proof by induction is left as an exercise for the reader) that
the sum of values shown at nodes in any level i = 0, ..., h − 1 is the same for
each such level. Thus the said sum is equal to the value showed by the only
node at level 0, that is, is equal to n.
Let a1 , ..., a2i be the values shown at the nodes of some level i = 0, ..., h−1.
The number of comps performed by a call to Merge invoked by the call to
MergeSort on an array of aj elements is either 0 if aj = 1 (no call to Merge
is made) or, as we have shown in the previous section, is aj − 1 if aj ≥ 2. So,
in either case, it is aj − 1. Thus the number of comps Ci performed at level
i is
Ci = (a1 − 1) + ... + (a2i − 1) = (a1 + ... + a2i ) − (1 + ... + 1) = n − 2i . (A.4)
|
{z
}
2i
Moreover, since all nodes at the last level h are 1’s
Ch = 0.
(A.5)
Therefore, the total number W (n) of comps that MergeSort performs in the
worst case on an n-element array is equal to
W (n) =
h
X
Ci =
i=0
[by (A.5)]
=
h−1
X
i=0
Ci =
M. A. Suchenek: Best-case Analysis of MergeSort (MS) v2
36
[by (A.4)]
h−1
X
=
(n − 2i ) = nh − (2h − 1) = nh − 2h + 1 =
i=0
[by (A.3)]
= ndlg ne − 2dlg ne + 1.
This way I have proved the following.
Theorem Appendix A.1. The number W (n) of comparisons of keys that
MergeSort performs in the worst case while sorting an n-element array is
W (n) = ndlg ne − 2dlg ne + 1.
(A.6)
Proof follows from the above derivation.
Using the well-known24 closed-form formula for
that
n
X
W (n) =
dlg ie.
Pn
i=1 dlg ie,
I conclude
(A.7)
i=1
Appendix B. Proof of
Pm−1
i=0
b n+i
c=n
m
Theorem Appendix B.0.3. For every natural number n and every positive
natural number m,
m−1
X n+i
c = n.
b
m
i=0
Proof. Let n = km + l, where 0 ≤ l < m.
We have
km + l + i
l+i
l+i
n+i
c=b
c = bk +
c=k+b
c.
m
m
m
m
Therefore,
b
m−1
X
m−1
m−1
m−1
X l+i
X l+i
X
n+i
b
c = mk+
b
c = mk+
b
c = mk+
1 = mk+l = n.
m
m
m
i=0
i=0
i=m−l
i=m−l
24
See [Knu97].
M. A. Suchenek: Best-case Analysis of MergeSort (MS) v2
37
References
[Baa91] Sara Baase. Computer Algorithms: Introduction to Design and
Analysis. Addison-Wesley Publishing, 2nd edition, 1991.
[Knu97] Donald E. Knuth. The Art of Computer Programming, volume 3.
Addison-Wesley Publishing, 2nd edition, 1997.
[McI74] M. D. McIlroy. The number of 1’s in binary integers: Bounds and
extremal properties. SIAM Journal of Computing, 3(4):255–261,
December 1974.
[RGP94] Donald Knuth Ronald Graham and Oren Patashnik.
Concrete Mathematics: A Foundation for Computer Science. Addison–Wesley, 1994.
[SF13] Robert Sedgewick and Philippe Flajolet. An Introduction to the
Analysis of Algorithms. Pearson, 2013.
[Suc16] Marek A. Suchenek.
Best-case analysis of MergeSort
with an application to the sum of digits problem (MS).
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1607.04604v1, July 18 2016.
[Tro68] J. R. Trollope. An explicit expression for binary digital sums. Mathematics Magazine, 41(1):21–25, Jan.–Feb. 1968.
c 2016 Marek A. Suchenek. All rights reserved by the author.
A non-exclusive license to distribute this article is granted to arXiv.org.
| 8cs.DS
|
arXiv:cond-mat/0407439v1 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 16 Jul 2004
A Theoretical Study on Spin-Dependent Transport of
“Ferromagnet/Carbon Nanotube Encapsulating Magnetic
Atoms/Ferromagnet” Junctions with 4-Valued Conductances
Satoshi Kokado1,2
∗
and Kikuo Harigaya2,3
†
1 Faculty
of Engineering, Shizuoka University, Hamamatsu 432-8561, Japan
Research Institute, AIST, Tsukuba 305-8568, Japan
3 Synthetic Nano-Function Materials Project, AIST, Tsukuba 305-8568, Japan
(October 11, 2017)
2 Nanotechnology
Abstract
As a novel function of ferromagnet (FM)/spacer/FM junctions, we theoretically investigate multiple-valued (or multi-level) cell property, which is in principle realized by sensing conductances of four states recorded with magnetization configurations of two FMs; (up,up), (up,down), (down,up), (down,down).
In order to sense all the states, 4-valued conductances corresponding to the
respective states are necessary. We previously proposed that 4-valued conductances are obtained in FM1/spin-polarized spacer (SPS)/FM2 junctions,
where FM1 and FM2 have different spin polarizations, and the spacer depends on spin [J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 15, 8797 (2003)]. In this paper, an
ideal SPS is considered as a single-wall armchair carbon nanotube encapsulating magnetic atoms, where the nanotube shows on-resonance or off-resonance
at the Fermi level according to its length. The magnitude of the obtained 4valued conductances has an opposite order between the on-resonant nanotube
and the off-resonant one, and this property can be understood by considering
electronic states of the nanotube. Also, the magnetoresistance ratio between
(up,up) and (down,down) can be larger than the conventional one between
parallel and anti-parallel configurations.
∗ Electronic
mail: [email protected]
† Electronic
mail: [email protected]
1
I. INTRODUCTION
Spin polarized junctions (SPJ) such as ferromagnet(FM)/spacer/FM junctions [1–4] have
been recently applied to elements in magnetic random access memories (MRAM) because of
their magnetoresistance (MR) effect, which appears when an applied magnetic field changes
an angle between magnetizations of two FMs. In the practical use, a spin-valve type, which
corresponds to a memory cell of 2 values (1bit) represented by “0” and “1” [5], is usually
adopted. For the writing process, the magnetization of only one side of the FM is changed
under the applied field so that magnetization configurations between two FMs are parallel
(P) or anti-parallel (AP). For the reading process, we use the difference in resistance between
the P and AP configurations, the so-called MR effect.
For the SPJ, much effort has been made to develop elements in high density memories,
which also have high sensitivity for the reading process. Important factors are considered
to be (a) large MR ratio, whose expression in the unit of percent is defined by 100 × (ΓP −
ΓAP )/ΓAP with ΓP (AP ) being conductance of the P (AP) case, and (b) ultra small junctions.
The realistic SPJ for (a) can be, for example, Co-Fe/Al-O/Co-Fe junctions with the MR
ratio of 60% at room temperature [2], epitaxially grown Ga1−x Mnx As/AlAs/Ga1−x Mnx As
junctions with the MR ratio more than 70% at 8 K [3], and Co/Fe-doped Al2 O3 /Ni80 Fe20
junctions, whose MR ratio was enhanced as compared to the case of an undoped Al2 O3 [4].
On the other hand, candidates of the SPJ for (b) may be FM/nanowire/FM junctions and
FM/carbon nanotube/FM junctions [6–11], where it should be noted that the nanotube
length is about 200 nm [7,8] or 250nm [6] in actual experiments and their size is very large
at the present moment. In the further, however, we appear to see many problems with how
to miniaturize the junctions, because challenges for the limits of the junctions size will be
more and more severe in spite of the progress of experimental techniques.
Studies from another viewpoints far from the miniaturization should be necessary simultaneously. In fact, for other memories [12] such as the Flash memory [13], multiple valued
(or multi-level) cell property [13], which allows the plural bits to be stored in each memory
cell and accordingly reduces the memory cell size by 1/(the number of bits), has been extensively studied. On the other hand, there are few studies for the SPJ. If such a property
is included in the SPJ, they will function as an memory cell, which is more efficient than
the conventional one.
We here describe the multiple-valued cell property in the general SPJ, based on our
previous study [14]. In a possible scheme, recorded states are supposed to be four magnetization configurations of two FMs consisting of (up,up), (up,down), (down,up), (down,down),
which are obtained by applying the magnetic fields to the respective FMs. The junctions
correspond just to 2bits memory cells. Then, in order to sense all the states, 4-valued
conductances corresponding to the respective states are obviously necessary. By paying attention to the magnitude of total magnetization in the whole system, a model to obtain such
conductances is considered to be FM1/spin-polarized spacer (SPS)/FM2 junctions, where
the FM1 and FM2 have different spin polarizations [15], according to the following procedure. First, a difference of conductances between (up,up) and (down,down) will appear, if
the spacer is the SPS, where magnetization in the spacer is pinned. Second, a difference
between (up,down) and (down,up) will be obtained by introducing the FM1 and FM2, in
addition to the above mentioned SPS.
2
In this paper, as an ideal SPS to observe 4-valued conductances, we adopt a single-wall
armchair carbon nanotube encapsulating magnetic atoms [16,17], and investigate the spin
dependent transport of “FM1/single-wall armchair carbon nanotube encapsulating magnetic
atoms/FM2” junctions using the Green’s function technique. When all spins of magnetic
atoms are pinned parallel to the magnetization axes of FM1 and FM2, 4-valued conductances are explicitly obtained at a certain value of an exchange interaction between conduction electron spin and spin of magnetic atoms. The magnitude of the obtained 4-valued
conductances has an opposite order between the nanotube with on-resonant behavior and
that with off-resonant behavior. Also, the MR ratio between ⇑, ⇑ and ⇓, ⇓ can be larger
than the conventional one between P and AP configurations.
II. IDEAL SPIN POLARIZED SPACERS TO OBTAIN 4-VALUED
CONDUCTANCES
We first consider ideal SPSs to certainly observe 4-valued conductances. In the previous
study [14], we found that 4-valued conductances tend to be obtained in the case of largely
spin-polarized spacer with
T↑,↑ − T↓,↓
∼ 1,
T↑,↑
(1)
where T↑,↑ and T↓,↓ are transmission coefficients of spin-up and spin-down, respectively, in
an expression of the conductance [18,19],
Γ=
4π 2 e2 X X
Tσ,σ′ D1,σ (EF )D2,σ′ (EF ),
h σ=↑,↓ σ′ =↑,↓
(2)
with σ (=↑ or ↓) being spin of the conduction electron, D1(2),σ (E) being the local densityof-states (DOS) at an interfacial layer in FM1(2) at the Fermi level EF , and Tσ,σ′ being a
spin dependent transmission coefficient including spin-flip process of σ 6= σ ′ . Based on the
fact, we give four objectives for the spacer having magnetic atoms, which are
(i) to strongly pin the magnetization of magnetic atoms in the spacer parallel to magnetization axes of FMs,
(ii) to diminish magnetic couplings between magnetic atoms and FMs,
(iii) to make effective couplings between the conduction electron spin and spins of magnetic
atoms, which act as much as possible,
(iv) to have a long spin-flip scattering length to conserve the spin of conduction electron
through the spacer.
As for (i), we propose that a coercive field of magnetic particles consisting of magnetic atoms
is much higher than ones of FMs. For (ii), we suppose that distances between magnetic
atoms and FMs should be controlled so that magnetic dipole-dipole interactions between
them become very small and give little influence on the spin dependent conduction. In (iii),
3
we should make a situation so that electrons in all conduction routes can interact with spins
of magnetic atoms. For (iv), it is desired that the spin-orbit interaction of a material of the
spacer is very small.
As a realistic SPS, which could satisfy such objectives, we bear in mind of a carbon
nanotube encapsulating magnetic atoms [16,17] by the following reasons: First, the size of
a particle consisting of magnetic atoms may be close to that of a single domain particle
by tuning conditions of fabrication, where the single domain particle has a high coercive
field. The coercive field was recently observed as about 0.5 kOe at 300 K even for Fe
particles encapsulated with non-single domain size of about 70 nm [16]. Furthermore, for
only the magnetic particle, it was experimentally shown that the Fe2 O3 nanoparticle with
the diameter of 6.3 nm has the coercive field of 1 kOe at 300 K [20]. If such the particle can
be encapsulated in the nanotube, the nanotube will act as the ideal SPS. Second, magnetic
atoms can be encapsulated in the inner region of the nanotube [16], where distances between
the atoms and nanotube edges could be tuned by controlling nanotube growth processes.
Third, since the encapsulated magnetic atoms are completely surrounded by carbon atoms,
electrons in all conduction routes can interact with spins of magnetic atoms. Here, magnitude
of couplings may be also tunable by controlling nanotube growth processes, because they
strongly depend on distances between carbon atoms and magnetic atoms. Fourth, the
nanotube itself has very long spin-flip scattering lengths which extend to 130 nm at least [6].
III. “FM1/CARBON NANOTUBE ENCAPSULATING MAGNETIC
ATOMS/FM2” JUNCTIONS
A. Model and method
We focus on “FM1/single-walled armchair carbon nanotube encapsulating magnetic
atoms/FM2” junctions, where magnetic atoms are located in the center of the nanotube.
Figure 1 shows a simplified model, in which the FM has a simple cubic structure, the xdirection of FMs is set to be semi-infinite, and their yz-directions have the periodic boundary
condition by being regarded as an infinite system. The armchair nanotube has a finite length,
and then it is regarded just as an armchair ribbon [21] with short periodicity. The each edge
carbon atom of the nanotube is assumed to interact with its nearest atom of the cubic lattice of the FM. On the other hand, the encapsulated magnetic atoms have localized spins.
We here assume that their spins are divided into several spin clusters which interact with
their nearest carbon atoms respectively, and all the spin clusters have the identical total
spin. The total spin is approximately represented by a classical spin S on the assumption
that the spin cluster consists of many spins, and further every S is set to have the same
direction. Now, each S is arrayed along two dimer lines of the nanotube, and it has one
to one interaction with carbon atoms in their lines. According to the theory on magnetic
impurity problem [22], we take into account antiferromagnetic exchange interactions between conduction electron spins and S’s, where all the exchange interactions are here set to
be same. Also, interactions between S’s and spins of FMs are neglected by assuming that
they have little influence on the spin dependent conduction, under a balance between their
coercive fields and magnetic fields due to respective spins. The balance is actually sensitive
to distances between magnetic atoms and FMs.
4
Using a single orbital tight-binding model with nearest neighbor transfer integrals, the
Hamiltonian is given by,
Htotal = H + V,
H = H10 + H20 + HN T ,
HN T = HN0 T + Hmag ,
(3)
(4)
(5)
with
Hu0 =
ei,σ c†i,σ ci,σ +
XX
i∈u σ
X X
ti,j c†i,σ cj,σ + h.c. ,
hi,ji∈u σ
(6)
for u=1, 2, NT ,
Hmag =
X
i∈mag
∆e
X
c†i,σ ci,σ − J
σ
X
σ,σ′
σσ,σ′ · Sc†i,σ ci,σ′ ,
(7)
V =
XX
vi,j c†i,σ cj,σ
+ h.c. ,
hi,ji σ
(8)
0
where H1(2)
is Hamiltonian for the FM1 (FM2), HN0 T is that for the carbon nanotube, and
Hmag denotes interactions between the encapsulated magnetic atoms and the respective
P
nearest carbon atoms, where i∈mag means that the summation is taken for carbon atoms
interacting with magnetic atoms. The term V represents couplings between FMs and the
nanotube, where the each edge carbon atom of the nanotube couples to its nearest atom
of the cubic lattice of the FM. Here, ci,σ (c†i,σ ) is the annihilation (creation) operator of an
electron with spin-σ (=↑ or ↓) at the i-th site, ti,j and vi,j are transfer integrals between
the i-th site and the j-th site, and ei,σ denotes the on-site energy for spin-σ at the i-th site.
Furthermore, ∆e is the difference of energy between the pure carbon atom and the carbon
atom interacting with the magnetic atoms, J is the antiferromagnetic exchange integral with
negative sign [22], and σσ,σ′ is the (σ, σ ′ ) component of the Pauli matrix for the conduction
electron spin. Also, S [= (Sx , Sy , Sz )] represents the classical spin with S ≡ |S|.
Within the Green’s function technique [18,19], we calculate the conductance at zero
temperature, which is written by,
4π 2 e2
Tr[D̂1 T̂ † D̂2 T̂ ],
h
T̂ = V + V G† V,
G = (EF + i0 − Htotal )−1 ,
Γ=
(9)
(10)
(11)
with
1
D̂u = − ImG0u ,
π
0
Gu = (EF + i0 − Hu0 )−1 ,
5
(12)
(13)
for u=1, 2. Here, D̂1(2) is the density-of-states (DOS) operator at EF of the FM1(2), and
T̂ is the T -matrix. We below name Γ for the respective magnetization configurations as
Γm1,m2 , where m1 (m2) is the magnetization state of FM1 (FM2), which is ⇑ or ⇓.
Using these conductances, we obtain the MR ratio in the unit of percent, which is defined
by
Rm1,m2 = 100 ×
Γ⇓,⇓ − Γm1,m2
,
Γ⇓,⇓
(14)
where m1 (m2) is the magnetization state of FM1 (FM2) with ⇑ or ⇓.
In this calculation, we choose parameters as follows: We set ti,j = t (< 0) [23] and
vi,j = 0.1t, assuming that v is smaller than t because of different types between two orbitals,
imperfect lattice matches at the interface, and so on. When EF =0, ei,↑ /|t| (ei,↓ /|t|) is 5.1
(5.7) for the FM1 and 5.175 (5.625) for the FM2 [24], by considering that the s-orbital,
which is spin-polarized by coupling to the localized d-orbitals, contributes to the transport
of the FMs. The spin polarization [15] at the interfacial layer of the FM1 (FM2) at EF , P1
(P2 ), is then evaluated to be about 0.45 (0.25) [25]. For the carbon atom, ei,↑ /|t| (ei,↓ /|t|)
is set to be 0 (0) by focusing on its π orbital. By taking into account that the π orbital
is coupled to d-orbitals of the magnetic atoms, whose energies are lower than ei,↑ /|t| and
ei,↓ /|t| of the π orbital, ∆e/|t| is considered to be positive and it is put as 0.2. Also, the
number of unit cells in the circumference direction of the nanotube is 10. The number of
dimer lines [21] N is 20, 21, and 22, which correspond to nanotubes with the on-resonance,
the off-resonance, and the off-resonance at EF , respectively [10,21]. It is well known that
the armchair nanotube shows the on-resonant behavior for N = 3M − 1, the off-resonant
one for N = 3M, and the off-resonant one for N = 3M + 1, respectively, with M being an
integer [10,21]. For N=20 and 21, the spin, S, is arrayed at each carbon atom in 10-th and
11-th dimer lines of the nanotube, while it is arrayed at each carbon atom in its 11-th and
12-th dimer lines for N=22. In each N, the number of S’s is 40, which is obtained from the
relation of (the number of unit cells in the circumference direction of the nanotube) × (the
number of dimer lines with S’s) × (the number of sublattices in the unit cell)= 10 × 2 × 2.
Furthermore, S’s are considered to exist parallel to yz-plane, and an angle between S’s and
z-axis is written as θ.
B. Calculated results and considerations
In the upper panel of Fig. 2(a), we show −JS/|t| dependence of the conductance, Γm1,m2 ,
for θ=0 in the case of N=20. At JS/|t|=0, Γm1,m2 has a difference only between P and AP
configurations. For JS/|t| =
6 0, differences among all conductances appear, and become
largest in the vicinity of JS/|t|=−0.2. Also, Γm1,m2 has a relation of Γ⇓,⇓ > Γ⇑,⇓ > Γ⇓,⇑ >
Γ⇑,⇑ for a wide range of −0.8 < JS/|t| < 0.
The middle and lower panels of Fig. 2(a) show Γm1,m2 for θ=0 in the case of N=21 and
22, respectively. In the case of N=21, differences among all conductances become large in the
vicinity of JS/|t|=−0.4, while they do in the vicinity of JS/|t|=−0.75 in the case of N=22.
It should be noted that Γm1,m2 of N=21 and 22 has a relation of Γ⇑,⇑ > Γ⇓,⇑ > Γ⇑,⇓ > Γ⇓,⇓
for a wide range of −0.8 < JS/|t| < 0, and its order is opposite to that of N=20.
6
The behavior of conductances can be understood by considering electronic states in the
center of the nanotube, where magnetic atoms are encapsulated. We therefore investigate
the local DOS, defined by,
X
1
Local DOS = − Im
hi|(EF + i0 − HN T )−1 |ii,
π i∈mag
(15)
where |ii represents the orbitals of carbon atoms interacting with magnetic atoms, and
P
i∈mag means that the summation is taken for those carbon atoms.
In the upper, middle, lower panels of Fig. 3(a), we show the local DOS for ∆e/|t|=0 and
JS/|t|=0, ∆e/|t|=0.2 and JS/|t|=0, and ∆e/|t|=0.2 and JS/|t|=−0.2, respectively, in the
case of N=20. For ∆e/|t|=0 and JS/|t|=0, i.e., the case of no encapsulated atoms, small
peaks of spin-up and spin-down are found at EF (=0), as shown in the upper panel of Fig.
3(a). The feature just represents the on-resonance at EF . The peaks originate from wave
functions at the Gamma point [21], which are delocalized over the whole nanotube. For
∆e/|t|=0.2 and JS/|t|=0, i.e., the case of encapsulated nonmagnetic atoms, the peaks of
spin-up and spin-down are shifted to higher energy with the same magnitude [see middle
panel of Fig. 3(a)]. Then, 2-valued conductances are obtained because of no difference
of local DOSs between spin-up and spin-down. On the other hand, for ∆e/|t|=0.2 and
JS/|t|=−0.2, i.e., the case of encapsulated magnetic atoms, the peak of spin-down is close
to EF as shown in the lower panel of Fig. 3(a). Since the electron favors to transmit when
the DOS is large around EF , transmission of spin-down electron increases compared to that
of spin-up electron. By taking into account the spin dependent DOSs of FMs with P1 =0.45
and P2 =0.25, Γ⇓,⇓ (Γ⇑,⇑) becomes largest (smallest) in all conductances, while Γ⇑,⇓ and Γ⇓,⇑
are present between Γ⇓,⇓ and Γ⇑,⇑ , and Γ⇑,⇓ > Γ⇓,⇑ is realized also.
The upper, middle, lower panels of Fig. 3(b) show the local DOS for ∆e/|t|=0 and
JS/|t|=0, ∆e/|t|=0.2 and JS/|t|=0, ∆e/|t|=0.2 and JS/|t|=−0.4, respectively, in the case
of N=21. In the upper panel of Fig. 3(b), no peaks are found at EF for ∆e/|t|=0 and
JS/|t|=0. It represents the off-resonance at EF . By setting ∆e/|t|=0.2 and JS/|t|=0, peaks
of spin-up and spin-down near EF are shifted to higher energy with the same magnitude
as shown in middle panel of Fig. 3(b), and then 2-valued conductances are obtained. For
∆e/|t|=0.2 and JS/|t|=−0.4, the peak of spin-up appears in the vicinity of EF [see the
lower panel of Fig. 3(b)]. Therefore, based on the DOSs of the FMs, Γ⇑,⇑ (Γ⇓,⇓ ) is largest
(smallest) in all conductances, while Γ⇑,⇓ and Γ⇓,⇑ are present between Γ⇑,⇑ and Γ⇓,⇓ , and
also Γ⇓,⇑ > Γ⇑,⇓ is realized. The case of N=22 can be understood based on the local DOSs
shown in Fig. 3(c), too.
We systematically understand the above peak shifts as follows: When the carbon atom
interacts with the magnetic atoms, its energy levels of spin-up are shifted to high energy,
while its energy levels of spin-down are not largely altered, owing to ∆e/|t| > 0 and JS/|t| <
0. For the on-resonant nanotube, in which energy levels of spin-up and spin-down exist at
EF for ∆e/|t|=JS/|t|=0, the energy levels of spin-down are closer to EF than those of spinup when ∆e/|t| > 0 and JS/|t| < 0. On the other hand, for the off-resonant nanotube, in
which no energy levels of spin-up and spin-down exist at EF for ∆e/|t|=JS/|t|=0, the energy
levels of spin-up near the top of the valence band approach to EF by setting ∆e/|t| > 0 and
JS/|t| < 0.
The MR ratio Rm1,m2 is shown in Fig. 2(b). In all panels, at JS/|t|=0, Rm1,m2 is finite
7
only between P and AP configurations and |Rm1,m2 | is about 15%. For a wide range of
−0.8 < JS/|t| < 0, |Rm1,m2 | between P and AP configurations can be more than 15%. It
should be emphasized that |Rm1,m2 | between ⇑, ⇑ and ⇓, ⇓ is larger than the conventional
one between P and AP configurations. This feature is consistent with results for the case of
the largely spin-polarized spacer with (T↑,↑ − T↓,↓ )/T↑,↑ ∼ 1 in the previous work [14]. Also,
it is characteristic that for a wide range of −0.8 < JS/|t| < 0, Rm1,m2 ’s of N=20 and N=21
and 22 exhibit the positive MR and the negative one, respectively, reflecting the opposite
order of Γm1,m2 between them.
In the following, we consider the θ dependence of Γm1,m2 and Rm1,m2 , shown in Figs.
4(a) and (b), respectively. In each figure, the upper, middle, and lower panels are cases of
JS/|t|=−0.2 of N=20, JS/|t|=−0.4 of N=21, and JS/|t|=−0.8 of N=22, respectively. A
condition of θ/π=−0.5 (0) represents that S’s are oriented in the −y (z) direction. In all
panels, at θ/π = −0.5, only the difference of Γm1,m2 between the P and AP configurations is
present, and then |Rm1,m2 | between them takes small values of less than 5 %, because of the
spin-flip transmission. As θ approaches to 0, differences of Γm1,m2 among all configurations
become large, because a difference of diagonal elements of T̂ with regards to spin between
spin-up and spin-down increases. Further, |Rm1,m2 | between ⇑,⇑ and ⇓,⇓ increases, too.
IV. CONCLUSION
For “FM1/armchair carbon nanotube encapsulating magnetic atoms/FM2” junctions,
we theoretically investigated the multiple-valued cell property, which is in principle realized
by sensing four states recorded with the magnetization configurations of two FMs. The
obtained 4-valued conductances are strongly influenced by electronic states of the nanotube,
and directions of spins of magnetic atoms. The order of magnitude of 4-valued conductances
is opposite between the on-resonant nanotube and the off-resonant one. Furthermore, the
MR ratio between (up,up) and (down,down) can be larger than the conventional one between
P and AP configurations.
From the viewpoint of device applications, we expect that the present junctions will be
a candidate for elements of the 2bits/cell MRAM. At the same time, the junctions with
magnetization reversals between ⇑, ⇑ and ⇓, ⇓ may be more efficient magnetic sensor than
the conventional spin-valve type [5], in the case of the largely spin-polarized spacer.
V. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work has been supported by Special Coordination Funds for Promoting Science and
Technology, Japan. One of the authors (K.H.) acknowledges the partial financial support
from NEDO via Synthetic Nano-Function Materials Project, AIST, Japan, too.
8
REFERENCES
[1] T. Miyazaki and N. Tezuka, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 139, L231 (1995); J. S. Moodera,
L. R. Kinder, T. M. Wong, and R. Meservey, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3273 (1995).
[2] M. Tsunoda, K. Nishikawa, S. Ogata, and M. Takahashi, Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 3135
(2002).
[3] M. Tanaka and Y. Higo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 026602 (2001).
[4] R. Jansen and J. S. Moodera, Appl. Phys. Lett. 75, 400 (1999).
[5] For example, see S. S. Parkin, K. P. Roche, M. G. Samant, P. M. Rice, R. B. Beyers, R.
E. Scheuerlein, E. J. O’Sullivan, S. L. Brown, J. Bucchigano, D. W. Abraham, Yu. Lu,
M. Rooks, P. L. Trouilloud, R. A. Wanner, W. J. Gallagher, J. Appl. Phys. 85, 5828
(1999).
[6] K. Tsukagoshi, B. W. Alphenaar, and H. Ago, Nature 401, 572 (1999).
[7] B. Zhao, I. Mönch, T. Mühl, H. Vinzelberg, and C. M. Schneider, Appl. Phys. Lett. 80,
3144 (2002).
[8] B. Zhao, I. Mönch, T. Mühl, H. Vinzelberg, and C. M. Schneider, J. Appl. Phys. 91,
7026 (2002).
[9] J. -R. Kim, H. M. So, J. -J. Kim, and J. Kim, Phys. Rev. B 66, 233401 (2002).
[10] H. Mehrez, J. Taylor, H. Guo, J. Wang, and C. Roland, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2682
(2000).
[11] S. Kokado and K. Harigaya, Phys. Rev. B 69, 132402 (2004); S. Kokado and K. Harigaya, Synth. Metals 135, 745 (2003).
[12] For example, see N. Takahashi, H. Ishikuro, and T. Hiramoto, Appl. Phys. Lett. 76,
209 (2000).
[13] R. V. Giridhar, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 35, 6347 (1996).
[14] S. Kokado and K. Harigaya, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 15, 8797 (2003).
[15] The spin polarization is defined by P1(2) = (D1(2),↑ − D1(2),↓ )/(D1(2),↑ + D1(2),↓ ), where
D1(2),↑ is the density-of-states (DOS) at the Fermi level of the FM1(2) for spin-up
and D1(2),↓ is that of the FM1(2) for spin-down. Also, for the spin polarization at the
interfacial layer, the DOS at the interfacial layer is used as D1(2),↑ . For example, see
J. M. De Teresa, A. Barthelemy, A. Fert, J. P. Contour, F. Montaigne, and P. Seneor,
Science 286, 507 (1999).
[16] For carbon nanotubes encapsulating magnetic atoms at the edge, X. X. Zhang, G. H.
Wen, S. Huang, L. Dai, R. Gao, Z. L. Wang, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 231, L9 (2001).
[17] For carbon nanotubes encapsulating magnetic atoms in the inner region, X. Zhao, S.
Inoue, M. Jinno, T. Suzuki, and Y. Ando, Chem. Phys. Lett. 373, 266 (2003).
[18] T. N. Todorov, G. A. D. Briggs, and A. P. Sutton, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 5, 2389
(1993).
[19] S. Kokado, M. Ichimura, T. Onogi, A. Sakuma, R. Arai, J. Hayakawa, K. Ito, and Y.
Suzuki, Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 3986 (2001).
[20] Y. Ichiyanagi and Y. Kimishima, J. Therm. Anal. Cal., 69, 919 (2002). As a relevant
report, see Y. Ichiyanagi, T. Uozumi, and Y. Kimishima, Trans. Mater. Res. Soc. Jpn.
26 [4], 1097 (2001).
[21] K. Wakabayashi, M. Fujita, H. Ajiki, and M. Sigrist, Phys. Rev. B 59, 8271 (1999).
[22] J. R. Schrieffer and P. A. Wolff, Phys. Rev. 149, 491 (1966).
[23] In the previous work [10], t was set to be −2.75 eV.
9
[24] To approximately describe the s-electron within the tight-binding model, we consider
that EF is located near the bottom of an energy dispersion relation. The dispersion
relation near the bottom is similar to that of the free electron, which is characteristic
of the s-electron. For example, see H. Itoh, A. Shibata, T. Kumazaki, J. Inoue, and S.
Maekawa, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 68, 1632 (1999).
[25] Materials with P1 ∼0.45 correspond nearly to Co, Fe, and Ni80 Fe20 , while P2 ∼0.25 is
Ni. J. S. Moodera and G. Mathon, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 200, 248 (1999).
10
FIGURES
Magnetic atoms
z
x
y
Carbon
nanotube
FM1
FM2
FIG. 1. A schematic illustration of spin-polarized junctions with the carbon nanotube, where
magnetic atoms are encapsulated in the center of the nanotube. Electric currents flow in the
x-direction.
11
–2
[×10 ]
4
:
:
:
2
0
:
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Γm1,m2/(e2/h)
–2
[×10 ]
1.5
1
0.5
0
–2
[×10 ]
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
(a)
–JS/|t|
100
50
Rm1,m2 [%]
0
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
0
–100
–200
0
–50
–100
–150
(b)
–JS/|t|
FIG. 2. (a) The conductance Γm1,m2 vs −JS/|t| for θ=0 and ∆e/|t|=0.2. The meanings of dots
in all panels are : Γ⇓,⇓ , ▽: Γ⇑,⇓ , ✷: Γ⇓,⇑ , △: Γ⇑,⇑ . (b) The MR ratio Rm1,m2 vs −JS/|t| for
θ=0 and ∆e/|t|=0.2. In each figure, the upper, middle, and lower panels are cases of N =20, 21,
and 22, respectively. The meanings of dots in all panels are : R⇓,⇓ , ▽: R⇑,⇓ , ✷: R⇓,⇑ , △: R⇑,⇑ .
12
0.5
Spin–up
Local DOS [states/|t|]
0
Spin–down
0.5
–1
0.5
–0.5
0
0.5
1
0.5
1
0.5
1
0.5
1
0.5
1
0.5
1
0.5
1
0.5
1
Spin–up
0
Spin–down
0.5
–1
0.5
–0.5
0
Spin–up
0
Spin–down
(a)
0.5
–1
–0.5
0
E/|t|
0.5
Spin–up
Local DOS [states/|t|]
0
Spin–down
0.5
–1
0.5
–0.5
0
Spin–up
0
0.5
–1
0.5
Spin–down
–0.5
0
Spin–up
0
(b)
0.5
–1
Spin–down
–0.5
0
E/|t|
0.5
Spin–up
Local DOS [states/|t|]
0
Spin–down
0.5
–1
0.5
–0.5
0
Spin–up
0
Spin–down
0.5
–1
0.5
–0.5
0
Spin–up
0
Spin–down
(c)
0.5
–1
–0.5
0
0.5
1
E/|t|
FIG. 3. The local DOS in the center of the nanotube, where magnetic atoms are encapsulated.
(a) The case of N =20. Upper panel: ∆e/|t|=0 and JS/|t|=0. Middle panel: ∆e/|t|=0.2 and
JS/|t|=0. Lower panel: ∆e/|t|=0.2 and JS/|t|=−0.2. (b) The case of N =21. Upper panel:
∆e/|t|=0 and JS/|t|=0. Middle panel: ∆e/|t|=0.2 and JS/|t|=0. Lower panel: ∆e/|t|=0.2
and JS/|t|=−0.4. (c) The case of N =22. Upper panel: ∆e/|t|=0 and JS/|t|=0. Middle panel:
∆e/|t|=0.2 and JS/|t|=0. Lower panel: ∆e/|t|=0.2 and JS/|t|=−0.8. Here, EF =0 is set.
13
–2
[×10 ]
4
2
:
:
:
:
0
Γm1,m2/(e2/h)
–0.5 –0.4 –0.3 –0.2 –0.1
–2
[×10 ]
1.5
0
1
0.5
0
–0.5 –0.4 –0.3 –0.2 –0.1
–2
[×10 ]
0.8
0
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
–0.5 –0.4 –0.3 –0.2 –0.1
0
–0.5 –0.4 –0.3 –0.2 –0.1
0
–0.5 –0.4 –0.3 –0.2 –0.1
0
–150
–0.5 –0.4 –0.3 –0.2 –0.1
0
θ/π
(a)
100
50
0
Rm1,m2 [%]
0
–100
–200
0
–50
–100
θ/π
(b)
FIG. 4. (a) The conductance Γm1,m2 vs θ. The meanings of dots in all panels obey those of
Fig. 2(a). (b) The MR ratio Rm1,m2 vs θ. In each figure, the upper, middle, and lower panels are
cases of JS/|t|=−0.2 of N =20, JS/|t|=−0.4 of N =21, and JS/|t|=−0.8 of N =22, respectively.
The meanings of dots in all panels obey those of Fig. 2(b).
14
| 5cs.CE
|
Orthogonal Series Density Estimation for Complex Surveys
Shangyuan Ye, Ye Liang and Ibrahim A. Ahmad
arXiv:1709.06588v2 [stat.ME] 26 Sep 2017
Department of Statistics, Oklahoma State University
Abstract
We propose an orthogonal series density estimator for complex surveys, where samples are neither independent nor identically distributed. The proposed estimator is
proved to be design-unbiased and asymptotically design-consistent. The asymptotic
normality is proved under both design and combined spaces. Two data driven estimators are proposed based on the proposed oracle estimator. We show the efficiency of
the proposed estimators in simulation studies. A real survey data example is provided
for an illustration.
Keywords: Nonparametric, asymptotic, survey sampling, orthogonal basis, HorvitzThompson estimator, mean integrated squared error.
1
Introduction
Nonparametric methods are popular for density estimations. Most work in the area of
nonparametric density estimation was for independent and identically distributed samples.
However, both assumptions are violated if the samples are from a finite population using
a complex sampling design. Bellhouse and Stafford (1999) and Buskirk (1999) proposed
kernel density estimators (KDE) by incorporating sampling weights, and their asymptotic
properties were studied by Buskirk and Lohr (2005). Kernel methods for clustered samples
and stratified samples were studied in Breunig (2001) and Breunig (2008), respectively.
One disadvantage of the KDE is that all samples are needed to evaluate the estimator.
However, in some circumstances, there is a practical need to evaluate the estimator without
using all samples for confidentiality or storage reasons. For example, many surveys are
routinely conducted and sampling data are constantly collected. Data managers want to
publish exact estimators without releasing all original data. In Section 6, we provide a real
data example from Oklahoma M-SISNet, which is a routinely conducted survey on climate
policies and public views. The orthogonal series estimators are useful alternatives to KDEs,
without needing to release or store all samples.
1
The basic idea of the orthogonal series method is that any square integrable function
f , in our case a density function, can be projected onto an orthogonal basis {ϕj }: f (x) =
P∞
j=0 θj ϕj (x), where
θj =
Z
ϕj (x)f (x)dx = E(ϕj (X))
(1)
is called the jth Fourier coefficient. Some of the work in orthogonal series density estimation (OSDE) was covered in monographs by Efromovich (1999) and Tarter and Lock
(1993), among others. Efromovich (2010) gave a brief introduction of this method. Walter
(1994) discussed properties of different bases. Donoho et al. (1996) and Efromovich (1996)
studied data driven estimators. Asymptotic properties were studied by Pinsker (1980) and
Efromovich and Pinsker (1982).
In this paper, we study the OSDE for samples from complex surveys. To the best of
our knowledge, no previous work has been done on developing OSDE for finite populations.
We propose a Horvitz-Thompson type of OSDE, incorporating sampling weights from the
complex survey. We show that the proposed OSDE is design-unbiased and asymptotically
design-consistent. We further prove the asymptotic normality of the proposed estimator. We
compare the lower bound of minimax mean integrated squared error (MISE) with the I.I.D.
case in Efromovich and Pinsker (1982). We propose two data driven estimators and show
their efficiency in a simulation study. Finally, we analyze the M-SISNet survey data using
the proposed estimation. All proofs to theorems and corollaries are given in the appendix.
2
Notations
Consider a finite population labeled as U = {1, 2, ..., N}. A survey variable x is associated
with each unit in the finite population. A subset s of size n is selected from U according to
some fixed-size sampling design P̧(·). The first and second order inclusion probabilities from
the sampling design P̧(·) are πi = Pr(i ∈ s) and πij = Pr(i, j ∈ s), respectively. The inverse
of the first order inclusion probability defines the sampling weight di = πi−1 , ∀i ∈ s.
The inference approach used in this paper for complex surveys is the combined designmodel-based approach originated in Hartley and Sielken (1975). This approach accounts
for two sources of variability. The first one is from the fact that the finite population is
a realization from a superpopulation, that is, the units xU = {x1 , x2 , ..., xN } are considered independent random variables with a common distribution function F , whose density
function is f . The second one is from the complex sampling procedure which leads to a
2
sample x = {x1 , x2 , . . . , xn }. Denote w = {w1 , w2 , . . . , wn } design variables that determine
the sampling weights. The sampling design P̧(·) is embedded within a probability space
(S, J̧, PP̧ ). The expectation and variance operator with respect to the sampling design are
denoted by EP̧ (·) = EP̧ (· | xU ) and VarP̧ (·) = VarP̧ (· | xU ), respectively. The superpopulation ξ, from which the finite population is realized, is embedded within a probability space
(Ω, F̧, Pξ ). The sample x and the design variables w are ξ-measurable. The expectation
and variance operator with respect to the model are denoted by Eξ (·) and Varξ (·), respectively. Assume that, given the design variables w, the product space, which couples the
model and the design spaces, is (Ω × S, F̧ × J̧, Pξ × PP̧ ). The combined expectation and
variance operators are denoted by EC (·) and VarC (·), where EC (·) = Eξ [EP̧ (· | xU )] and
VarC (·) = Eξ [VarP̧ (· | xU )] + Varξ [EP̧ (· | xU )].
3
Main Results
Consider a sample s = {x1 , x2 , ..., xn } drawn from a finite population xU using some fixedsize sampling design P̧(·). Our goal is to estimate the hypothetical density function f of the
superpopulation. Equation (1) implies that θj can be estimated using the Horvitz-Thompson
(HT) estimator for the finite population mean
θ̂j = N
−1
n
X
di ϕj (xi ),
(2)
i=1
where N is the finite population size and di = πi−1 is the sampling weight for unit i. The
HT estimator is a well known design unbiased estimator (Fuller, 2009). The basis {ϕj } can
be Fourier, polynomial, spline, wavelet, or others. Properties of different bases are discussed
in Efromovich (2010). We consider the cosine basis throughout the paper, which is defined
√
as {ϕ0 = 1, ϕj = 2 cos(πjx)}, j = 1, 2, · · · , x ∈ [0, 1]. Regarding the compact support [0, 1]
for the density, we adopt the argument in Wahba (1981):“it might be preferable to assume
the true density has compact support and to scale the data to interior of [0, 1].” Analogous
to Efromovich (1999), we propose an orthogonal series estimator in the form
fˆ(x) = fˆ(x, {wj }) = 1 +
∞
X
wj θ̂j ϕj (x),
(3)
j=1
where θ̂j is the HT estimator for the Fourier coefficient as in (2) and wj ∈ [0, 1] is a shrinking
R1
coefficient. Note that θ0 = 0 f (x)dx = 1. If xU is known for all units in the finite population,
3
we can write the population estimator for f (x) as
fU (x) = fU (x, {wj }) = 1 +
where θU,j = N
PN
−1
i=1
∞
X
wj θU,j ϕj (x),
(4)
j=1
ϕj (xi ).
The following theorems and a corollary show properties of our proposed estimator under
both design and combined spaces. Theorem 1 considers unbiasedness and consistency under
the design space.
PP
P∞ 2
πik
Theorem 1 Suppose f ∈ L2 (R), δ = N −1
i=1 wi < ∞.
i6=k πi πk − N < ∞ and
Then, the estimator fˆ(x, {wj }) is design-unbiased and asymptotically design-consistent for
fU (x, {wj }), i.e.,
h
h
i
i
ˆ
ˆ
EP̧ f (x, {wj }) = fU (x, {wj }) and ΓP̧ = VarP̧ f (x, {wj }) → 0 as N → ∞.
Theorem 2 shows the asymptotic normality of the proposed estimator fˆ(x, {wj }) under
the design space.
Theorem 2
Suppose that all assumptions in Theorem 1 hold. As N → ∞,
fˆ(x, {wj }) − fU (x, {wj })
Γ̂P̧
L
P̧
−−→ N(0, 1),
(5)
where
Γ̂P̧ = N −1
J
X
wj2 (1 + 2−1/2 θ̂2j + δ θ̂j2 )(1 + 2−1/2 ϕ2j (x)).
j=1
We then show the asymptotic normality of the proposed estimator fˆ(x, {wj }) under the
combined inference. Define a Sobolev Class of k-fold differentiable densities as F̧(k, Q) =
P∞
P
2k 2
{f : f (x) = 1 + ∞
j=1 (πj) θj ≤ Q < ∞}, k ≥ 1. Note that for any
j=1 θj ϕj (x),
f ∈ F̧(k, Q), f is 1-periodic, f (k−1) is absolute differentiable and f (k) ∈ L2 (R).
Theorem 3
Suppose that f ∈ F̧(k, Q) and all assumptions in Theorem 2 hold. Then,
fˆ(x, {wj }) − f (x) LC
h
i −→ N(0, 1) as N → ∞,
VarC fˆ(x, {wj })
(6)
h
i
P
where VarC fˆ(x, {wj }) = N −1 Jj=1 wj2 bj (1 + 2−1/2 ϕ2j (x)) and bj = 2 + 21/2 θ2j + (δ − 1)θj2 +
oN (1).
4
The following corollary is a direct result of using Theorem 3 and Efromovich and Pinsker
(1982). It shows the lower bound of the minimax MISE for the proposed estimator fˆ(x, {wj })
under the Sobolev class.
Corollary 1 Let f ∈ F̧(k, Q) and fˆ(x, {wj }) be the estimator in Theorem 3. The lower
bound of the minimax MISE, under the combined inference approach, is given by:
h
i
R(F̧) = inf sup MISEC fˆ(x, {wj }) ≥ N −2k/(2k+1) P (k, Q, b)(1 + oN (1)),
(7)
{wj }
f ∈F̧(k,Q)
o2k/(2k+1)
n
k
and b = 2.
where P (k, Q, b) = Q1/(2k+1) π(k+1)b
Remark that this lower bound is of the same form as the I.I.D. case in Efromovich and Pinsker
(1982), but with b = 2 instead of b = 1.
4
Data Driven Estimators
The choice of shrinking coefficients ŵj is not unique. To get a proper data driven estimator,
we start with the oracle estimator (3), and then obtain ŵj by minimizing the MISE for the
oracle estimator. Here, we propose two estimators: a truncated estimator and a smoothed
truncated estimator, mimicking those in the I.I.D. case.
The truncated estimator, denoted by fˆT , is an estimator with ŵj = 1 for j ≤ J, and
ŵj = 0 for j > J. Alternatively we can write ŵj = Ij≤J . Then, only the truncation
parameter J needs to be estimated. Notice that the MISE of this estimator is
J h
h
i Z
i X
2
ˆ
MISEC f (x, {wj }) =
VarC (θ̂j ) − θj − f 2 (x)dx.
j=1
Since f 2 (x)dx is fixed and an unbiased estimator for θj2 is θ̂j2 −N −1 bj , a data-driven estimate
for J can be obtained from
R
Jˆ = arg min
J
X
(2N −1 b̂j − θ̂j2 ),
j=1
where b̂j is the plug-in estimator of bj . In practice, the solution is obtained through a
numerical search. Efromovich (1999) suggests to set the upper bound for Jˆ to be ⌊4+0.5 ln n⌋
for the search. Theoretically, the minimum of the MISE can be approximated in the following
corollary.
5
Corollary 2
Let f ∈ F̧(k, Q), k > 1/2. The MISE of fˆT is minimized when
J ≈ N 1/(2k+1) H1 (k, b, c),
(8)
and the minimum is approximately
R(fˆT ) = MISEC (fˆT (x, {ŵj })) ≈ N −2k/(2k+1) H2 (k, b, c),
−1/(2k+1)
where H1 (k, b, c) = b
and c is a constant.
2k+1
(2k+2)c
−1/(2k+1)
2k/(2k+1)
, H2 (k, b, c) = b
(9)
2k+1
(2k+2)c
−1/(2k+1)
,
One possible modification for fˆT is to shrink each Fourier coefficient toward zero. We call
this estimator the smoothed truncated estimator, denoted by fˆS . It is constructed similarly
as the truncated estimator, with the first J Fourier coefficients shrunk by multiplying the
optimal smoothing coefficients wj∗, obtained from the proof of Corollary 1. Mathematically,
ŵj = ŵj∗ Ij≤J , where ŵj∗ = (θ̂j2 − N −1 b̂j )/θ̂j2 is a direct plug-in estimator for wj∗ .
A potential problem of the nonparametric density estimation is that the estimator may
not be a valid density function. A simple modification is to define the L2 -projection of fˆT
(or fˆS ) onto a class of non-negative densities, f˜T (x) = max{0, fˆT (x) − const.}, where the
normalizing constant is to make f˜T integrate to 1. It has been proved that the constant
always exists and is unique (Glad et al., 2003).
5
Simulation
We compared our proposed estimators with the series estimator that ignores the finite population and sampling designs, through a Monte Carlo simulation study. We considered
estimating density functions for three sampling designs: (1) the simple random sample without replacement (SRSWOR), (2) the stratified sampling and (3) the Poisson sampling. Note
that the Poisson sampling has a random size with units independently sampled and hence
violates our assumption of fixed size sampling.
1. For the SRSWOR, we considered two superpopulations: the standard normal distribution N(0, 1) and a mixture normal distribution 0.4N(−1, 0.5) + 0.6N(1, 1).
2. For the stratified sampling, we considered two superpopulations: a two-component
mixture normal 0.4N(−1, 0.5) + 0.6N(1, 1) and a three-component mixture normal
6
0.3N(−1, 0.15) + 0.4N(0, 0.15) + 0.3N(1, 0.15). We designed two strata for the twocomponent mixture and three strata for the three-component mixture. A proportional
stratified sampling is used.
3. For the Poisson sampling, we considered the same two superpopulations as in (1).
We specified the expected sample size for the Poisson sampling to be n, and generated the first order inclusion probabilities for the Poisson sampling using the function
“inclusionprobabilities” in the R package “sampling” (Till and Matei, 2016).
For all cases, we considered a finite population of size N = 1, 000 drawn from each of the
superpopulations. We repeated drawing the finite population for m1 = 100 times. For each
of the finite population, we drew samples according to the sampling design, with increasing
sample sizes: n = 20, 40, 60 and 80. The replication number for each finite population is
m2 = 10, 000. The performance of estimators is measured by a Monte Carlo approximation
of the MISE:
Z
m1 X
m2 h
i2
1 X
f˜ij (x) − f (x) dx.
MISEMC (f˜) =
mm
1
2 i=1 j=1
The results of the simulation study are shown in Table 1. In general, the I.I.D. series
estimator, which ignores the sampling design, performs the worst in all cases. However,
it is not surprising to see that the improvement for the proposed estimators is much more
in stratified sampling than in SRSWOR or Poisson sampling. It confirms the necessity of
incorporating stratification sampling weights into the series estimator for a complex survey.
Lastly, the smoothed truncated estimator performs better than the truncated estimator in
most scenarios.
6
Oklahoma M-SISNet Survey
The Oklahoma Weather, Society and Government Survey conducted by Meso-Scale Integrated Sociogeographic Network (M-SISNet) measures Oklahomans’ perceptions of weather
in the state, their views on government policies and societal issues and their use of water and
energy. The survey is routinely conduced at the end of each season. Until the end of 2016, 12
waves of survey data have been collected. It is desired that estimates can be obtained without constantly pulling out the original data. The sampling design has two separated phases.
In Phase I, a simple random sample of size n = 1, 500 is selected from statewide households.
In Phase II, a stratified oversample is selected from five special study areas: Payne County,
7
Oklahoma City County, Kiamichi County, Washita County and Canadian County. In each
stratum, the sample size is fixed to be 200. The second phase can be viewed as a stratified
sampling over the entire state with six strata: n1 = · · · = n5 = 200 and n6 = 0, where the
sixth stratum contains households not in the five special study areas. This design with oversampling is not a typical fixed-size complex survey. The first-order inclusion probabilities
are approximately πhi = nh /Nh + n/N, for i = 1, . . . , Nh and h = 1, . . . , 6. Note that for
units not in the five areas, this inclusion probability is simply n/N. We presents OSDEs for
two continuous variables for illustration: the monthly electricity bill and the monthly water
bill. Figure 1 shows OSDEs of the two variables for all seasons in 2015.
Acknowledgement
This research is partially supported by National Science Foundation under Grant No. OIA1301789.
Appendix
Proof of Theorem 1
Proof. We first show that fˆ(x, {wj }) is design-unbiased:
∞
h
i
X
EP̧ fˆ(x, {wj }) = EP̧ 1 +
wj θ̂j ϕj (x)
j=1
= 1+
= 1+
∞
X
j=1
∞
X
wj EP̧ (θ̂j )ϕj (x)
wj θU,j ϕj (x)
j=1
= fU (x, {wj }).
It remains to show that fˆ(x, {wj }) is asymptotically design-consistent, that is, the design-variance
of fˆ(x, {wj }) approaches zero in the limit. We need the simple fact that
√
ϕ2j (x) = [ 2 cos(πjx)]2 = 1 + cos(π2jx) = 1 + 2−1/2 ϕ2j (x).
8
Then, we have
ΓP̧ = VarP̧ 1 +
=
∞
X
∞
X
j=1
wj θ̂j ϕj (x)
wj2 ϕ2j (x)VarP̧ (θ̂j )
j=1
=
∞
X
wj2
j=1
h
#
" n
i
X
di ϕj (xi ) ,
1 + 2−1/2 ϕ2j (x) N −2 VarP̧
i=1
and
VarP̧
"
n
X
i=1
#
di ϕj (xi )
= VarP̧
= EP̧
=
N
X
i=1
−
=
"
"
N
X
i=1
Ii di ϕj (xi )
i=1
N
X
#2
Ii di ϕj (xi )
i=1
−
(
EP̧
EP̧ (Ii2 )d2i EP̧ ϕ2j (xi ) +
(N
X
N
X
#
EP̧ (Ii )di EP̧ [ϕj (xi )]
i=1
"
N
X
#)2
Ii di ϕj (xi )
i=1
XX
πik di dk EP̧ [ϕj (xi )] EP̧ [ϕk (xk )]
i6=k
)2
h
i XX π
ik 2
2
EP̧ 1 + 2−1/2 ϕ2j (xi ) +
θ − N 2 θU,j
πi πk U,j
i6=k
2
= N (1 + 2−1/2 θU,2j + δθU,j
)
≤ N M,
2 ≤ M < ∞ for every j.
where 1 + 2−1/2 θU,2j + δθU,j
P
2
Hence, ΓP̧ ≤ N −1 M ∞
j=1 wj → 0 as N → ∞.
Proof of Theorem 2
Proof. By the definition of θ̂j and θU,j , we have
fˆ(x, {wj }) = 1 +
= 1+
∞
X
wj θ̂j ϕj (x)
j=1
N
X
i=1
9
Ii di
∞
X
j=1
wj ϕj (x)ϕj (xi ),
and
E Ii di
∞
X
j=1
wj ϕj (x)ϕj (xi ) =
=
∞
X
wj ϕj (x)E [ϕj (xi )]
j=1
∞
X
wj θU,j ϕj (x).
j=1
Also, from the proof of Theorem 1, we have
∞
∞
X
X
2
wj2 (1 + 2−1/2 θU,2j + δθU,j
)
wj ϕj (x)ϕj (xi ) =
Var Ii di
j=1
j=1
≤ B
∞
X
j=1
wj2 < ∞ by assumption.
Therefore, by the Lindeberg-Lévy central limit theorem, we have
fˆ(x, {wj }) − fU (x, {wj }) LP̧
−−→ N (0, 1).
ΓP̧
(10)
It remains to show that Γ̂P̧ is consistent for ΓP̧ under design, or equivalently,
P
P̧
|Γ̂P̧ − ΓP̧ | −−→ 0, as n → N.
(11)
Condition (11) can be proved by using the facts that θ̂j is design unbiased and E(θ̂j2 ) = θj2 +
Var(θ̂j ) → θj2 as n → N .
Then, Theorem 2 is proved by using the equations (10) and (11) in conjunction with Slutsky’s
theorem.
Proof of Theorem 3
Proof. Since fU (x, {wj }) is the standard OSDE from an I.I.D. sample which is the finite population,
then
fU (x, {wj }) − f (x) Lξ
−→ N (0, 1).
Varξ [fU (x, {wj })]
10
(12)
The asymptotic distribution of the I.I.D. OSDE under Sobolev class is obtained from Efromovich
(1999), Chapter 7. Also,
J
h
i
h
i
X
VarC wj θ̂j ϕj (x)
VarC fˆ(x, {wj }) =
j=1
=
J
X
wj2 (1 + 2−1/2 ϕ2j (x))VarC (θˆj )
(13)
j=1
Next, we calculate the variance of θ̂j by using Theorem 1:
h
i
h
i
VarC (θ̂j ) = Eξ VarP̧ (θ̂j ) + Varξ EP̧ (θ̂j )
h
i
2
) + Varξ (θU,j )
= Eξ N −1 (1 + 2−1/2 θU,2j + δθU,j
h
i
2
) + Varξ (θU,j )
= N −1 1 + 2−1/2 θ2j + δEξ (θU,j
(14)
2 ) and Var (θ
Then, we evaluate Eξ (θU,j
ξ U,j ) separately. Based on a standard result in the I.I.D. case,
we have
Varξ (θU,j ) = N −1 (1 + 2−1/2 θ2j − θj2 )
(15)
and
2
Eξ (θU,j
) = E2ξ (θU,j ) + Varξ (θU,j )
= N −1 (1 + 2−1/2 θ2j − θj2 ) + θj2 .
Then, plug equations (15) and (16) into (14), we have
h
i
VarC (θ̂j ) = N −1 2 + 21/2 θ2j + (δ − 1)θj2 + oN (1) = N −1 bj .
(16)
(17)
Hence, plug (17) into (13) we can get the variance of fˆ under the combined inference approach.
Finally, apply Theorem 5.1 in Bleuer and Kratina (1999), Theorem 3 is proved.
Proof of Corollary 1
Proof. The proof is similar to Efromovich and Pinsker (1982). We sketch the steps as follows. We
first evaluate the linear minimax MISE for the functions in the Sobolev class defined above. That
is, we optimize wj∗ ’s that minimize MISEC (fˆ). Notice that EC (θ̂j ) = Eξ [EP̧ (θ̂j )] = Eξ (θU,j ) = θj
11
implying that θ̂j is an unbiased estimator of θj . Therefore,
Z
h
i
MISEC fˆ(x, {wj }) = EC
(f − fˆ)2
∞ n
o
i
h
X
wj2 VarC (θ̂j ) + θj2 − 2wj θj2 + θj2 .
=
(18)
j=1
A straightforward calculation yields that
wj∗ =
θj2
θj2 + VarC (θ̂j )
.
(19)
Plug equation (19) into (18),
h
i
sup MISEC fˆ(x, {wj })
{wj } f ∈F̧(k,Q)
∞
X
θj2 VarC (θ̂j )
≥
sup
,
2
f ∈F̧(k,Q) j=1 θj + VarC (θ̂j )
RL (F̧) =
inf
(20)
where VarC (θ̂j ) is of the form (17). Plug (17) into (20), and use the Lagrange multiplier to show
that the maximum of (6) is attained at
θj2 = N −1 (µ/(πj)k − bj )+ ,
where µ is determined by the constraint
obtain
P∞
2k 2
j=1 (πj) θj
(21)
≤ Q. Plug equation (21) back to (20), we
RL (F̧) ≥ N −2k/(2k+1) P (k, Q, b).
Pinsker (1980) shows that for Sobolev ball F̧, the linear minimax risk is asymptotically equal to
the minimax risk, that is, R(F̧) = RL (F̧)(1 + oN (1)). Therefore Corollary 1 is proved.
Proof of Corollary 2
Proof. Let ŵj = Ij≤J . Plug equation (17) into (18), we have
R(fˆT ) = N −1
J
X
j=1
bj +
∞
X
j=J+1
θj2 ≈ N −1 bJ +
12
∞
X
j=J+1
θj2 .
(22)
Notice that for f ∈ F̧(k, Q). By a straightforward calculation, we have θj2 = cj −2(k+1) (Efromovich,
1999). Therefore,
∞
X
j=J+1
θj2
≈c
Z
∞
j −2(k+1) dj =
J
c
J −2k−1 .
2k + 1
(23)
Plug (23) into (22) and optimize J, Corollary 2 is proved.
References
Bellhouse, D. and Stafford, J. (1999), ‘Density estimation from complex surveys’, Statistica
Sinica 9, 407–424.
Bleuer, S. and Kratina, I. (1999), ‘On the two-phase framework for joint model and designbased inference’, The Annals of Statistics 33, 2789–2810.
Breunig, R. (2001), ‘Density estimation for clustered data’, Econometric Reviews 20, 353–
367.
Breunig, R. (2008), ‘Nonparametric density estimation for stratified samples’, Statistics and
Probability Letters 78, 2194–2200.
Buskirk, T. (1999), Using nonparametric methods for density estimation with complex survey
data, Technical report, PhD thesis, Department of Mathematics, Arizona State University.
Buskirk, T. and Lohr, S. (2005), ‘Asymptotic properties of kernel density estimation with
complex survey data’, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 128, 165–190.
Donoho, D., Johnstone, I., Kerkyacharian, G. and Picard, D. (1996), ‘Density estimation by
wavelet thresholding’, Annals of Statistics 24, 508–539.
Efromovich, S. (1996), ‘Adaptive orthogonal series density estimation for small samples’,
Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 22, 599–617.
Efromovich, S. (1999), Nonparametric Curve Estimation: Methods, Theorey and Applications, New York: Springer.
Efromovich, S. (2010), ‘Orthogonal series density estimation’, WIREs Comp Stat 2, 467–476.
13
Efromovich, S. and Pinsker, M. (1982), ‘Estimation of square-integrable probability density
of a random variable’, Problems of Information Transmission 18, 19–38.
Fuller, W. (2009), Sampling Statistics, Wiley, New York.
Glad, I., Hjort, N. and Ushakov, N. (2003), ‘Correction of density estimators that are not
densities’, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 30, 415–427.
Hartley, H. and Sielken, R. (1975), ‘A super-population viewpoint for finite population sampling’, Biometrics 31, 411–422.
Pinsker, M. (1980), ‘Optimal filtration of square-integrable signals in Gaussian noise’, Problems Inform. Transmission 16, 53–68.
Tarter, M. and Lock, M. (1993), Model-Free Curve Estimation, New York: Chapman and
Hall.
Till, Y. and Matei, A. (2016), sampling: Survey Sampling. R package version 2.8.
URL: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=sampling
Wahba, G. (1981), ‘Data-based optimal smoothing of orthogonal series density estimates’,
The Annals of Statistics 9, 146–156.
Walter, G. (1994), Wavelets and other Orthogonal Systems with Applications, London: CRC
Press.
14
Table 1: Monte Carlo approximation of MISE for three sampling designs and two superpopulations. The finite population size is N = 1, 000. The replication size of the finite
population is m1 = 100, and the replication size of the sample is m2 = 10, 000. Three
estimators are compared: the truncated estimator, the smoothed estimator and the series
estimator ignoring finite population and sampling design (I.I.D.).
SRSWOR
n
20
40
60
80
Standard Normal
Mixture Normal
Truncated Smoothed I.I.D. Truncated Smoothed
0.0232
0.0220
0.0290
0.0498
0.0480
0.0150
0.0140
0.0157
0.0311
0.0318
0.0116
0.0109
0.0121
0.0226
0.0234
0.0094
0.0089
0.0100
0.0173
0.0180
I.I.D.
0.0535
0.0388
0.0335
0.0219
n
20
40
60
80
Poisson Sampling
Standard Normal
Mixture Normal
Truncated Smoothed I.I.D. Truncated Smoothed
0.0497
0.0481
0.0527
0.0580
0.0442
0.0281
0.0270
0.0392
0.0344
0.0294
0.0241
0.0229
0.0237
0.0283
0.0280
0.0201
0.0190
0.0211
0.0235
0.0234
I.I.D.
0.0705
0.0399
0.0322
0.0285
n
20
40
60
80
Stratified Sampling
Two Strata
Three Strata
Truncated Smoothed I.I.D. Truncated Smoothed
0.0415
0.0409
0.0739
0.2847
0.2826
0.0231
0.0230
0.0688
0.2731
0.2718
0.0181
0.0180
0.0672
0.0426
0.0419
0.0142
0.0142
0.0675
0.0412
0.0406
I.I.D.
0.3106
0.3309
0.1132
0.1175
15
0.020
(a) Water Bill
0.000
0.005
Density
0.010
0.015
Winter
Spring
Summer
Fall
0
50
100
150
200
Amount (in dollars)
250
300
(b) Electricity Bill
0.000
Density
0.004
0.008
Winter
Spring
Summer
Fall
0
50
100
150
200
Amount (in dollars)
250
300
Figure 1: OSDEs of the electricity bill and the water bill for seasonal waves in 2015.
16
| 10math.ST
|
arXiv:cs/0411028v1 [cs.DC] 10 Nov 2004
A Machine-Independent Port of the SR Language
Run Time System to NetBSD Operating System
Ignatios Souvatzis
University of Bonn, CS Dept., Chair V
<[email protected]>
29th of September, 2004
1
Introduction
SR (synchronizing resources)[1] is a PASCAL – style language enhanced with constructs
for concurrent programming developed at the University of Arizona in the late 1980s[2].
MPD (presented in Gregory Andrews’ book about Foundations of Multithreaded, Parallel, and Distributed Programming[3]) is its successor, providing the same language
primitives with a different syntax.
The run-time system (in theory, identical) of both languages provides the illusion
of a multiprocessor machine on a single single- or multi- CPU Unix-like system or a
(local area) network of Unix-like machines.
Chair V of the Computer Science Department of the University of Bonn is operating
a laboratory for a practical course in parallel programming consisting of computing
nodes running NetBSD/arm, normally used via PVM, MPI etc.
We are considering to offer SR and MPD for this, too. As the original language
distributions are only targeted at a few commercial Unix systems, some porting effort
is needed, outlined in the SR porting guide[4].
The integrated POSIX threads support of NetBSD-2.0 should allow us to use library primitives provided for NetBSD’s phtread system to implement the primitives
needed by the SR run-time system, thus implementing 13 target CPUs at once and
automatically making use of SMP on VAX, Alpha, PowerPC, Sparc, 32-bit Intel and
64 bit AMD CPUs.
This paper describes work in progress.
2
Generic Porting Problems
Given the age of the software and the gradual development of the C language and the
operating system environments available, some adaptation is to be expected. Fortunately, the latest distribution of SR (version 2.3.2) has already been portend to two
relatively modern Unix-like environments (Solaris 2.2 and Linux), so the necessary
changes turned out to be confined to a one area:
gcc 3, the system compiler of NetBSD-2.0, doesn’t provide old <varags.h> variable
argument functions anymore, so those had to be converted to <stdarg.h> syntax.
Also, none of those functions had fixed arguments. Most of the functions had a first
logical parameter char *locn which could be changed into a fixed parameter. A few
functions had a first integer parameter (a count of the remaining parameters). In one
Implementation
i386 assembler
SVR4 system calls
Context switch times
0.059 µs
6.025 µs
Table 1: Raw context switch times
case (sr cat), the loops extracting the parameters from the variable argument list had
to be changed to be initialized with the newly introduced fixed parameter.
3
Verification methods
SR itself provides a basic and an extended verification suite for the whole system; also
a small basic test for the context switching primitives.
The basic suite should be run to test an installation; the context switch tests and
the extended suite are used to verify a new porting effort.[4]
3.1
Context Switch Primitives
The context switch primitives can be independently tested by running make in the
subdirectory csw/ of the distribution; this builds and runs the cstest program, which
implements a small multithreaded program and checks for detection of stack overflows,
stack underflows, correct context switching etc.
3.2
Overall System
When the context switch primitives seem to work individually, they — and the building
system used to build SR, and the sr compiler, linker, etc. need also to be tested.
A basic verification suite is in the vsuite/ subdirectory of the distribution; it can be
extended with more tests from a seperate source archive vs.tar.Z. It is run by calling
the driver script srv/srv, which provides normal and verbose modes, as well as using
the installed vs. the freshly compiled SR system. The only test that is expected to fail
is the srgrind source code formatter — it needs the vgrind program as a backend.
4
Performance evaluation
SR comes with two performance ealuation packages. The first, for the context switching
primitives, is in the csw/ subdirectory of the source distribution; after make csloop you
can start ./csloop N where N is the number of seconds the test will run approximately.
Tests of the language primitives used for multithreading are in the vsuite/timings/
subdirectory of the source tree enhanced with the verification suite. They are run by
three shell scripts to compile them, run them, and summarize the results in a table.
5
Establishing a baseline
There are two extremes possible when implementing the context switch primitives
needed for SR: implementing each CPU manually in assembler code (what the SR
project does normally) and using the SVR4-style getcontext() and setcontext()
functions which operate on struct ucontext; these are provided as experimental code
in the file csw/svr4.c of the SR distribution.
Test description
loop control overhead
local call, optimised
interresource call, no new process
interresource call, new process
process create/destroy
semaphore P only
semaphore V only
semaphore pair
semaphore requiring context switch
asynchronous send/receive
message passing requiring context switch
rendezvous
i386 ASM
0.01 µs
0.07 µs
1.45 µs
2.95 µs
2.46 µs
0.07 µs
0.05 µs
0.11 µs
0.39 µs
1.71 µs
1.90 µs
2.65 µs
SVR4 s.c.
0.01 µs
0.07 µs
1.39 µs
22.20 µs
26.14 µs
0.07 µs
0.05 µs
0.11 µs
9.09 µs
1.63 µs
14.50 µs
27.05 µs
Table 2: Run time system performance. The median times reported by the SR script
vsuite/timings/report.sh are reported.
The first tests were done by using the provided i386 assembler context switch routines. After verifying correctness and noting the times (see tables 5 and 5), the same
was done using the SVR4 module instead of the assembler module.
All tests were done on a 500 MHz Pentium III machine with 16+16 kB of primary
cache and 512 kB of secondary cache, and 128 MB of main memory, running NetBSD2.0 BETA as of end of June 2004.
The table shows a factor-of-about-ten performance hit for the operations that require context switches; note, however, that the absolute values for all such operations
are still smaller than 30 µs on 500 MHz machine and will likely not be noticable if a
parallelized program is run on a LAN-coupled cluster: on the switched LAN connected
to the test machine, the time for an ICMP echo request to return is about 250 µs.
6
Possible improvements using NetBSD library calls
While using the system calls getcontext and setcontext, as the svr4 module does,
should not unduly penalize an application distributed across a LAN, it might be noticable with local applications.
However, we should be able to do better than the svr4 module without writing
our own assembler modules, as NetBSD 2.0 (and up) contains its own set of them for
the benefit of its native Posix threads library (libpthread), which does lots of context
switches within a kernel provided light weight process ([5]). The primitives provided to
libpthread by its machine dependent part are the two functions getcontext u and
setcontext u with similar signatures to getcontext and setcontext.
There are a few difficulties that arise while pursuing this.
First, on one architecture (i386) setcontext u and getcontext u are implemented by calling through a function pointer which is initialized depending on the
FPU / CPU extension mode available on the particular CPU used (on i386, 8087mode vs. XMM). from this. On this architecture, setcontext u and getcontext u
are defined as macros in a private header file not installed. The developer in charge
of the code has indicated that he might implement public wrappers; until then, we’d
have to check all available NetBSD architectures and copy the relevant files.
Second, there is no context initializing function at the same level as setcontext u
and getcontext u. makecontext looks like it would be good enough but this has to
be analyzed further.
7
7.1
Work items left to do
Building a package for pkgsrc
To ease installation, a prototype package for the NetBSD package system has been
built. It needs a bit of refinement, though, but will be available soon. (As the NetBSD
package system is available for more operating systems than NetBSD, a bit more work
is needed.)
7.2
Implementing and testing multithreaded SR
SR can be compiled in a mode where it will make use of multiple threads provided by
the underlying OS, so that it can use more than one CPU of a single machine. This
has not been implemented yet for NetBSD, but should be.
References
[1] Gregory R. Andrews and Ronald A. Olsson, The SR Programming Language:
Concurrency in Practice (Benjamin/Cummings, 1993
[2] Gregory R. Andrews, Ronald A. Olsson, Michael H. Coffin, Irving Elshoff, Kelvin
D. Nilsen, Titus Purdin and Gregg M. Townsend, An Overview of the SR Language
and Implementation, 1988, ACM TOPLAS Vol. 10.1, p. 51-86
[3] Gregory R. Andrews, Foundations of Multithreaded, Parallel, and Distributed Programming, Addison-Wesley, 2000 (ISBN 0-201-35752-6)
[4] Gregg Townsend, Dave Bakken, Porting the SR Programming Language, 1994,
Department of Computer Science, The University of Arizona
[5] Nathan J. Williams, An Implementation of Scheduler Activations on
the NetBSD Operating System, in:
Proceedings of the FREENIX
Track, 2002 Usenix Annual Technical Conference, Monterey, CA, USA,
http://www.usenix.org/events/usenix02/tech/freenix/williams.html
| 6cs.PL
|
Improving speech recognition by revising gated recurrent units
Mirco Ravanelli1 , Philemon Brakel2 , Maurizio Omologo1 , Yoshua Bengio2
1
2
Fondazione Bruno Kessler, Trento, Italy
Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
arXiv:1710.00641v1 [cs.CL] 29 Sep 2017
Abstract
Speech recognition is largely taking advantage of deep learning,
showing that substantial benefits can be obtained by modern
Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs). The most popular RNNs
are Long Short-Term Memory (LSTMs), which typically reach
state-of-the-art performance in many tasks thanks to their ability to learn long-term dependencies and robustness to vanishing
gradients. Nevertheless, LSTMs have a rather complex design
with three multiplicative gates, that might impair their efficient
implementation. An attempt to simplify LSTMs has recently
led to Gated Recurrent Units (GRUs), which are based on just
two multiplicative gates.
This paper builds on these efforts by further revising GRUs
and proposing a simplified architecture potentially more suitable for speech recognition. The contribution of this work is
two-fold. First, we suggest to remove the reset gate in the
GRU design, resulting in a more efficient single-gate architecture. Second, we propose to replace tanh with ReLU activations in the state update equations. Results show that, in our
implementation, the revised architecture reduces the per-epoch
training time with more than 30% and consistently improves
recognition performance across different tasks, input features,
and noisy conditions when compared to a standard GRU.
Index Terms: speech recognition, deep learning, recurrent neural networks, LSTM, GRU
1. Introduction
Building machines that are able to recognize speech represents
a fundamental step towards flexible and natural human-machine
interfaces. A primary role for improving such a technology is
played by deep learning [1], which has recently contributed to
significantly outperform previous GMM/HMM speech recognizers [2]. During the last years, deep learning has been rapidly
evolving, progressively offering more powerful and robust techniques, including effective regularization methods [3, 4], improved optimization algorithms [5], as well as better network
architectures. The early deep learning works in speech recognition were mainly based on standard multilayer perceptrons
(MLPs) [6, 7], while recent systems benefit from more advanced architectures, such as Convolutional Neural Networks
(CNNs) [8] and Time Delay Neural Network (TDNN) [9, 10].
Nevertheless, since speech is inherently a sequential signal, it would be natural to address it with Recurrent Neural
Networks (RNNs), which are potentially able to properly capture long-term dependencies. Several works have already highlighted the effectiveness of RNNs in various speech processing
tasks such as speech recognition [11, 12, 13, 14, 15], speech
enhancement [16], speech separation [17, 18] as well as speech
activity detection [19]. Recent results in the newborn field of
end-to-end speech recognition [20, 21] have also shown that
RNNs are promising candidates for replacing traditional Hidden
Markov Models (HMMs) in DNN/HMM speech recognizers.
Training RNNs, however, can be complicated by vanishing and exploding gradients, which might impair learning longterm dependencies [22]. Although exploding gradients can effectively be tackled with simple clipping strategies [23], the
vanishing gradient problem requires special architectures to be
properly addressed. A common approach relies on the socalled gated RNNs, whose core idea is to introduce a gating
mechanism for better controlling the flow of the information
through the various time-steps. Within this family of architectures, vanishing gradient issues are mitigated by creating effective “shortcuts”, in which the gradients can bypass multiple
temporal steps.
The most popular gated RNNs are Long Short-Term Memory networks (LSTMs) [24], which often achieve state-of-theart performance in several machine learning tasks. LSTMs rely
on a network design consisting of memory cells which are controlled by forget, input, and output gates. Despite their effectiveness, such a sophisticated gating mechanism might result
in an overly complex model that can be tricky to implement
efficiently. On the other hand, computational efficiency is a
crucial issue for RNNs and considerable research efforts have
recently been devoted to the development of alternative architectures [25, 26, 27]. With this purpose, an attempt to simplify
LSTMs has led to a novel model called Gated Recurrent Unit
(GRU) [28, 29], which is based on just two multiplicative gates.
Despite the adoption of a simplified gating mechanism, some
works in the literature agree that GRUs and LSTMs provide
a comparable performance in different machine learning tasks
[29, 26, 30].
This work continues these efforts by further revising GRUs
and proposing an architecture potentially more suitable for
speech recognition. The contribution of this paper is twofold:
First, we propose to remove the reset gate from the network design. Similarly to [31], we found that removing the reset gate
does not affect the system performance, since we observed a
certain redundancy in the role played by the update and reset
gates. Second, we propose to replace hyperbolic tangent (tanh)
with Rectified Linear Units (ReLU) activations in the state update equation. In the past, such a non-linearity has been avoided
for RNNs due to the numerical instabilities caused by the unboundedness of ReLU activations. However, when coupling our
ReLU-based GRU architecture with batch normalization [4], we
did not experience such numerical issues. This allows us to take
advantage of ReLU neurons, which have been proven effective
at further alleviating the vanishing gradient problem as well as
speeding up network training.
Our results, obtained on different tasks, input features, and
noisy conditions show that, in our implementation, the revised
architecture reduces the per-epoch training wall-clock time with
more than 30%, while improving the recognition performance
over all the experimental conditions considered in this work.
2. Revising GRUs
The GRU architecture is defined by the following equations:
zt = σ(Wz xt + Uz ht−1 + bz ),
rt = σ(Wr xt + Ur ht−1 + br ),
(1a)
(1b)
het = tanh(Wh xt + Uh (ht−1 rt ) + bh ),
(1c)
ht = zt ht−1 + (1 − zt )het .
(1d)
In particular, zt and rt are vectors corresponding to the update and reset gates respectively, while ht represents the state
vector for the current time frame t. The activations of both
gates are element-wise logistic sigmoid functions σ(·), which
constrain zt and rt to take values ranging from 0 and 1. The
candidate state het is processed with a hyperbolic tangent. The
network is fed by the current input vector xt (e.g., a vector with
speech features), while the parameters of the model are the matrices Wz , Wr , Wh (the feed-forward connections) and Uz , Ur ,
Uh (the recurrent weights). The architecture finally includes
trainable bias vectors bz , br and bh , which are added before the
non linearities.
As shown in Eq. 1d, the current state vector ht is a linear interpolation between the previous activation ht−1 and the current
candidate state het . The weighting factors are set by the update
gate zt , that decides how much the units will update their activations. Note that such a linear interpolation, which is similar
to that adopted for LSTMs [24], is the key component for learning long-term dependencies. For instance, if zt is close to one,
the previous state is kept unaltered and can remain unchanged
for an arbitrary number of time steps. On the other hand, if zt
is close to zero, the network tends to favor the candidate state
het , which depends more heavily on the current input and on the
closer hidden states. The candidate state het , also depends on the
reset gate rt , which allows the model to delete the past memory
by forgetting the previously computed states.
The model proposed in this paper is a revised version of the
GRUs described above. The main changes concern reset gate
and ReLU activations, as outlined in the next sub-sections.
2.1. Removing the reset gate
The reset gate can be useful when significant discontinuities
occur in the sequence. For language modeling, this may happen when moving from one text to another one which is notsemantically related. In such situations, it is convenient to reset
the stored memory in order to avoid taking a decision biased
by an uncorrelated history. However, for some specific tasks
such a functionality might not be useful. In [31], for instance,
removing rt from the GRU model has led to a single-gate architecture called Minimal Gated Recurrent Unit (M-GRU), which
achieves a performance comparable to that obtained by standard
GRUs in handwritten digit recognition as well as in a sentiment
classification task.
We argue that the role played by the reset gate should be reconsidered also for acoustic modeling in speech recognition. In
fact, a speech signal is a sequence that evolves rather slowly (the
features are typically computed every 10 ms), in which the past
history can virtually always be helpful. Even in the presence
of strong discontinuities, for instance observable at the boundary between a vowel and a fricative, completely resetting the
past memory can be harmful. On the other hand, it is helpful
to memorize phonotactic features, since some phone transitions
are more likely than others.
Figure 1: Average activations of update and reset gates for a
GRU trained on TIMIT in a chunk of the utterance “sx403” of
speaker “faks0”.
Moreover, we believe that a certain redundancy in the activations of reset and update gates might occur when processing
speech sequences. For instance, when it is necessary to give
more importance to the current information, the GRU model can
set small values of rt . A similar effect can also be achieved with
the update gate only, by setting small values of zt . The latter solution tends to weight more the candidate state het , which, as desired, depends more heavily on the current input and on its more
recent history. Similarly, a high value can be assigned either to
rt or to zt , in order to place more importance on past states.
This redundancy is also highlighted in Fig. 1, where a temporal
correlation in the average activations of update and reset gates
can be readily appreciated for a GRU trained on TIMIT.
The first modification to standard GRUs proposed in this
work thus concerns the removal of the reset gate rt , which helps
in limiting the redundancy in the gating mechanism. The main
benefits of this intervention are related to the improved computational efficiency, which is achieved thanks to the reduced
number of parameters necessary to reach the performance of a
standard GRU.
2.2. ReLU activations
The second modification consists in replacing the standard hyperbolic tangent with ReLU activations in the state update equations (Eq. 1c - 1d). Tanh activations are, indeed, rather critical since their saturation slows down the training process and
causes vanishing gradient issues. The adoption of ReLU-based
neurons, which have shown effective in improving such limitations, was not so common in the past for RNNs, due to numerical instabilities originated by the unbounded ReLU functions
applied over long time series. Nevertheless, some recent works
have shown that ReLU RNNs can be effectively trained with a
proper orthogonal initialization [32].
Formally, removing the reset gate and replacing the hyperbolic tangent function with the ReLU activation now leads to
the following update equations:
zt = σ(Wz xt + Uz ht−1 + bz ),
(2a)
het = ReLU(Wh xt + Uh ht−1 + bh ),
(2b)
ht = zt ht−1 + (1 − zt )het .
(2c)
We called this architecture M-reluGRU, to emphasize the modifications carried out on a standard GRU.
2.3. Batch Normalization
Batch normalization [4] has been recently proposed in the machine learning community and addresses the so-called internal
covariate shift problem by normalizing, for each training minibatch, the mean and the variance of each layer pre-activations.
Such a technique has shown to be crucial both to improve the
system performance and to speed-up the training procedure.
Batch normalization can be applied to RNNs in different ways.
In [33], authors suggest to apply it to feed-forward connections
only, while in [34] the normalization step is extended to recurrent connections, using separate statistics for each time-step.
In this work, we tried both approaches and we observed
a comparable performance between them. We also noticed
that coupling the proposed model with batch-normalization
[4] helps in avoiding the numerical issues that often occur
when dealing with ReLU RNNs applied to long time sequences. Batch normalization, indeed, rescales the neuron preactivations, inherently bounding the values of the ReLU neurons. This allows the network to take advantage of the wellknown benefits of such activations.
3. Experimental setup
3.1. Corpora and tasks
To provide an accurate evaluation of the proposed architecture,
the experimental validation was conducted using different training datasets, tasks and environmental conditions. A first set of
experiments with TIMIT was performed to test the proposed
model in a close-talking scenario. The experiments with TIMIT
are based on the standard phoneme recognition task, which is
aligned with that proposed in the Kaldi s5 recipe [35].
A set of experiments was also conducted in a distant-talking
scenario with a Wall Street Journal (WSJ) task, to validate our
model in a more realistic situation. The reference context was
a domestic environment characterized by the presence of nonstationary noise (with an average SNR of about 10dB) and
acoustic reverberation (with an average reverberation time T60
of about 0.7 seconds). The original WSJ training dataset was
contaminated with a set of impulse responses measured in a real
apartment. The test phase was carried out with the DIRHAEnglish corpus1 (with both real and simulated datasets), consisting of 409 WSJ sentences uttered by six native American
speakers in the same apartment. A development set of 310 WSJ
sentences uttered by six different speakers was also used for
hyperparameter tuning. More details on this dataset and on the
impulse responses can be found in [36, 37].
3.2. System details
The architecture adopted for the experiments consisted of multiple recurrent layers, which were stacked together prior to the
final softmax context-dependent classifier. These recurrent layers were bidirectional RNNs [11], which were obtained by concatenating the forward hidden states (collected by processing
the sequence from the beginning to the end) with backward
hidden states (gathered by scanning the speech in the reverse
time order). Recurrent dropout was used as regularization technique. Since extending standard dropout to recurrent connections hinders learning long-term dependencies, we followed the
approach introduced in [38], which tackles this issue by sharing the same dropout mask across all the time steps. More1 This dataset is being distributed by the Linguistic Data Consortium
(LDC).
over, batch normalization was adopted exploiting the method
suggested in [33], as discussed in Sec. 2. The feed-forward
connections of the architecture were initialized according to the
Glorot initialization [39], while recurrent weights were initialized with orthogonal initialization [32]. Similarly to [40], the
gain factor γ of batch normalization was initialized to γ = 0.1
and the shift parameter β was initialized to 0.
Before training, the sentences were sorted in ascending order according to their lengths and, starting from the shortest
utterances, minibatches of 8 sentences were progressively processed by the training algorithm. This sorting approach, besides
minimizing zero-paddings when forming mini-batches, exploits
a curriculum learning strategy [41] which has been shown to improve the performance and to ensure numerical stability of gradients. The optimization was done using the Adam algorithm
[5], which ran for 22 epochs. The performance on the development set was monitored after each epoch, while the learning rate
was halved when the performance improvement went below a
certain threshold. Gradient truncation was not applied, allowing the system to learn arbitrarily long time dependences. The
speech recognition labels were derived by performing a forced
alignment procedure on the original training datasets. See the
standard s5 recipe of Kaldi for more details [35].
To evaluate the proposed architecture on different input
features, three sets of experiments were performed with 39
MFCCs, with 40 mel-filterbank coefficients, as well as with 40
fMLLR features derived by a Speaker Adaptive Training (SAT)
procedure [35]. All of these feature vectors were computed every 10 ms with a frame length of 25 ms.
The main hyperparameters of the model (i.e., learning rate,
number of hidden layers, hidden neurons per layer, dropout factor) were optimized on the development data. In particular, we
guessed some initial values according to our experience, and
starting from them we performed a grid search to progressively
explore better configurations. A total of 20-25 experiments
were conducted for the RNN models. As a result, an initial
learning rate of 0.0013 and a dropout factor of 0.2 were chosen for all the experiments. The optimal numbers of hidden
layers and hidden neurons, instead, depend on the considered
dataset/model, and range from 4 to 5 hidden layers with 375607 neurons.
The proposed system was implemented with Theano [42]
and coupled with the Kaldi decoder [35] to form a contextdependent DNN/HMM speech recognizer2 .
4. Results
In the following sub-sections, a comparison of the proposed architecture with other popular RNNs is presented. The results
will be reported for the standard close-talking TIMIT dataset
and for the distant-talking WSJ task based on the DIRHA English dataset.
4.1. Results on TIMIT
Table 1 presents the results obtained with the TIMIT dataset.
To perform a more accurate comparison of the various architectures, at least five experiments varying the initialization seeds
were conducted for each RNN model. The results in Table 1 are
reported as the average Phone Error Rates (PER%) with their
corresponding standard deviations.
2 The code used for the experiments can be found at https://
github.com/mravanelli/theano-kaldi-rnn/.
PP
P Feat.
Arch. PPP
P
MFCC
FBANK
fMLLR
relu-RNN
18.7 ± 0.18 18.3 ± 0.23 16.3 ± 0.11
LSTM
18.1 ± 0.33 17.1 ± 0.36 15.7 ± 0.32
GRU
17.1 ± 0.20 16.7 ± 0.36 15.3 ± 0.28
M-GRU
17.2 ± 0.11 16.7 ± 0.19 15.2 ± 0.10
M-reluGRU
16.7 ± 0.26 15.8 ± 0.10 14.9 ± 0.27
Table 1: Phone Error Rate (PER%) obtained for the test set of
TIMIT with various RNN architectures.
Architecture Layers Neurons # Params Training time
relu-RNN
4
607
6.1 M
318 sec.
LSTM
5
375
8.8 M
506 sec.
GRU
5
465
10.3 M
580 sec.
M-GRU
5
465
7.4 M
390 sec.
M-reluGRU
5
465
7.4 M
390 sec.
Table 2: Comparison of the per-epoch training time for the RNN
architectures optimized on the TIMIT development set.
The first row of Table 1 presents the results of a traditional
RNN with ReLU activations (no gating mechanisms are used
here). Although this architecture has recently shown promising
results in some machine learning tasks [32], our speech recognition performance results confirm that gated recurrent networks
(rows 2-5) still outperform traditional RNNs. We also observed
that GRUs tend to slightly outperform the LSTM, in the tasks
addressed in these experiments.
The M-GRU architecture is the version of GRU without
the reset gate. Table 1 highlights that the M-GRU achieves a
performance very similar to that obtained with standard GRUs,
further confirming our speculation on the negligible role played
by the reset gate in a speech recognition application. The last
row of Table 1 reports the performance achieved with the proposed model, in which, besides removing the reset gate, ReLU
activations are used. Results indicate that M-reluGRU consistently achieves the best performance across the various input
features. A remarkable achievement is the average PER(%) of
14.9% obtained with the proposed architecture using fMLLR
features. To the best of our knowledge, such a result yields the
best published performance on the TIMIT test-set.
Table 2 reports a comparison of the per-epoch training time
for all the considered RNNs. Results confirm that the main advantage of the proposed model is its ability to significantly reduce the training time. In our Theano implementation, running
each GRU epoch lasts 580 seconds on an NVIDIA K40 GPU
against just 390 seconds taken by the M-reluGRU, with a training time reduction of more than 32%. Table 2 also reports the
best architectures obtained after optimizing the hyperparameters on the TIMIT development set. Results show that for GRU
models the best performance is achieved with 5 hidden layers
of 465 neurons.
4.2. Results on DIRHA English WSJ
Tables 3 and 4 summarize the results obtained with the simulated and real parts of the DIRHA English WSJ dataset. For the
sake of compactness, only the average performance (obtained
by running five experiments with different initialization seeds)
is reported, while standard deviations (which range from 0.2%
to 0.4%) are omitted.
XX
XXX Feat.
XXX MFCC FBANK fMLLR
Arch.
X
relu-RNN
23.7
23.5
18.9
LSTM
23.2
23.2
18.9
GRU
22.3
22.5
18.6
M-GRU
21.5
22.0
18.0
M-reluGRU
21.3
21.4
17.6
Table 3: Word Error Rate (%) obtained with the DIRHA English
WSJ dataset (simulated part) for various RNN architectures.
XXX
XXXFeat. MFCC
XX
Arch.
X
FBANK
fMLLR
relu-RNN
29.7
30.0
24.7
LSTM
29.5
29.1
24.6
GRU
28.5
28.4
24.0
M-GRU
28.4
28.1
23.6
M-reluGRU
27.8
27.6
22.8
Table 4: Word Error Rate (%) obtained with the DIRHA English
WSJ dataset (real part) for various RNN architectures.
Table 3 and 4 exhibit a trend comparable to that observed
for the TIMIT dataset, confirming the effectiveness of the proposed architecture also in a more realistic and challenging scenario. The results are consistent over both real and simulated
data as well as across the different features considered in this
study. The reduction of the training time is about 36% (25 minutes for per-epoch training with the proposed model against 40
minutes spent by the standard GRU).
Moreover, the reset gate removal seems to play a more crucial role in the addressed distant-talking scenario. If the closetalking results reported in Table 1 highlight comparable error
rates between standard GRU and M-GRU, in the distant-talking
case we even observe a performance gain when removing the
reset gate. We suppose that this behaviour is due to reverberation, which implicitly introduces redundancy in the signal, due
to the multiple delayed replicas of each sample. This results in
a forward memory effect that smooths energy envelopes as well
as sub-band energy contours. Due to this effect, a reset gate
mechanism might become ineffective to forget the past.
5. Conclusions
In this paper, we revised standard GRUs for speech recognition
purposes. The proposed architecture is a simplified version of
a GRU, in which the reset gate is removed and ReLU activations are used. The experiments, conducted on different tasks,
features and environmental conditions, have confirmed the effectiveness of the proposed model not only to reduce the computational complexity of our implementation (with a reduction
of more than 30% of the training time over a standard GRU),
but also to slightly improve the recognition performance.
Future efforts will be focused on extending this work to
different tasks and larger datasets (e.g., switchboard or LibriSpeech) and to test the revised architecture on modern endto-end systems (such as CTC and attention-based models). To
ensure the practical value of the computational gains of our
models, these experiments should be replicated using more optimized implementations.
6. References
[1] I. Goodfellow, Y. Bengio, and A. Courville, Deep Learning. MIT
Press, 2016, http://www.deeplearningbook.org.
[2] D. Yu and L. Deng, Automatic Speech Recognition - A Deep
Learning Approach. Springer, 2015.
[3] N. Srivastava, G. Hinton, A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and
R. Salakhutdinov, “Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting,” Journal of Machine Learning Research,
vol. 15, pp. 1929–1958, 2014.
[4] S. Ioffe and C. Szegedy, “Batch normalization: Accelerating deep
network training by reducing internal covariate shift,” in Proc. of
ICML, 2015, pp. 448–456.
[5] D. Kingma and J. Ba, “Adam: A method for stochastic optimization,” in Proc. of ICLR, 2015.
[6] H. Bourlard and N. Morgan, “Continuous speech recognition by
connectionist statistical methods,” IEEE Transactions on Neural
Networks, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 893–909, 1993.
[7] G. Dahl, D. Yu, L. Deng, and A. Acero, “Context-dependent pretrained deep neural networks for large vocabulary speech recognition,” IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 30–42, 2012.
[8] O. Abdel-Hamid, A. R. Mohamed, H. Jiang, L. Deng, G. Penn,
and D. Yu, “Convolutional neural networks for speech recognition,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language
Processing, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 1533–1545, Oct 2014.
[9] A. Waibel, T. Hanazawa, G. Hinton, K. Shikano, and K. Lang,
“Phoneme recognition using time-delay neural networks,” IEEE
Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal processing,
vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 328–339, 1989.
[10] V. Peddinti, D. Povey, and S. Khudanpur, “A time delay neural
network architecture for efficient modeling of long temporal contexts,” in Proc of INTERSPEECH, 2015, pp. 3214–3218.
[11] A. Graves, N. Jaitly, and A. Mohamed., “Hybrid speech recognition with Deep Bidirectional LSTM,” in Proc of ASRU, 2013.
[12] H. Sak, A. W. Senior, and F. Beaufays, “Long short-term memory recurrent neural network architectures for large scale acoustic
modeling,” in Proc. of INTERSPEECH, 2014, pp. 338–342.
[13] D. Amodei et al., “Deep speech 2: End-to-end speech
recognition in english and mandarin,” 2015. [Online]. Available:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1512.02595
[14] Z. Chen, S. Watanabe, H. Erdogan, and J. Hershey, “Speech
enhancement and recognition using multi-task learning of long
short-term memory recurrent neural networks,” in Proc. of INTERSPEECH, 2015, pp. 3274–3278.
[15] T. Menne, J. Heymann, A. Alexandridis, K. Irie, A. Zeyer,
M. Kitza, P. Golik, I. Kulikov, L. Drude, R. Schlüter, H. Ney,
R. Haeb-Umbach, and A. Mouchtaris, “The RWTH/UPB/FORTH
System Combination for the 4th CHiME Challenge Evaluation,”
in CHiME 4 challenge, 2016, pp. 39–44.
[16] F. Weninger, H. Erdogan, S. Watanabe, E. Vincent, J. L. Roux,
J. R. Hershey, and B. W. Schuller, “Speech enhancement with
LSTM recurrent neural networks and its application to noiserobust ASR,” in Proc. of LVA/ICA, 2015, pp. 91–99.
[17] F. Weninger, J. Le Roux, J. Hershey, and B. Schuller, “Discriminatively trained recurrent neural networks for single-channel speech
separation,” in Proc. of IEEE GlobalSIP, 2014.
[18] H. Erdogan, J. R. Hershey, S. Watanabe, and J. L. Roux, “Phasesensitive and recognition-boosted speech separation using deep
recurrent neural networks,” in Proc. of ICASSP, 2015, pp. 708–
712.
[19] F. Eyben, F. Weninger, S. Squartini, and B. Schuller, “Real-life
voice activity detection with lstm recurrent neural networks and
an application to hollywood movies,” in Proc. of ICASSP, 2013,
pp. 483–487.
[20] A. Graves and N. Jaitly, “Towards end-to-end speech recognition with recurrent neural networks,” in Proc. of ICML, 2014, pp.
1764–1772.
[21] D. Bahdanau, J. Chorowski, D. Serdyuk, P. Brakel, and Y. Bengio,
“End-to-End Attention-based Large Vocabulary Speech Recognition,” in Proc. of ICASSP, 2016.
[22] Y. Bengio, P. Simard, and P. Frasconi, “Learning long-term dependencies with gradient descent is difficult,” IEEE Transaction
on Neural Networks, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 157–166, Mar. 1994.
[23] R. Pascanu, T. Mikolov, and Y. Bengio, “On the difficulty of training recurrent neural networks.” in Proc. of ICML, 2013, pp. 1310–
1318.
[24] S. Hochreiter and J. Schmidhuber, “Long short-term memory,”
Neural Computation, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1735–1780, Nov. 1997.
[25] K. Greff, R. K. Srivastava, J. Koutnk, B. R. Steunebrink, and
J. Schmidhuber, “Lstm: A search space odyssey,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. PP, no. 99,
pp. 1–11, 2016.
[26] R. Jozefowicz, W. Zaremba, and I. Sutskever, “An empirical exploration of recurrent network architectures,” in Proc. of ICML,
2015, pp. 2342–2350.
[27] Y. Zhang, G. Chen, D. Yu, K. Yao, S. Khudanpur, and J. R. Glass,
“Highway long short-term memory RNNS for distant speech
recognition,” in Proc. of ICASSP 2016, 2016, pp. 5755–5759.
[28] K. Cho, B. van Merrienboer, D. Bahdanau, and Y. Bengio, “On
the properties of neural machine translation: Encoder-decoder approaches,” in Proc. of SSST, 2014.
[29] J. Chung, Ç. Gülçehre, K. Cho, and Y. Bengio, “Empirical evaluation of gated recurrent neural networks on sequence modeling,”
in Proc. of NIPS, 2014.
[30] K. Irie, Z. Túske, T. Alkhouli, R. Schlúter, and H. Ney, “LSTM,
GRU, Highway and a Bit of Attention: An Empirical Overview
for Language Modeling in Speech Recognition,” in Proc. of INTERSPEECH, 2016.
[31] G. Zhou, J. Wu, C. Zhang, and Z. Zhou, “Minimal gated
unit for recurrent neural networks,” 2016. [Online]. Available:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1603.09420
[32] Q. Le, N. Jaitly, and G. Hinton, “A simple way to initialize
recurrent networks of rectified linear units,” 2015. [Online].
Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1504.00941
[33] C. Laurent, G. Pereyra, P. Brakel, Y. Zhang, and Y. Bengio, “Batch
normalized recurrent neural networks,” in Proc. of ICASSP, 2016,
pp. 2657–2661.
[34] T. Cooijmans, N. Ballas, C. Laurent, and A. Courville,
“Recurrent batch normalization,” 2016. [Online]. Available:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1603.09025
[35] D. Povey et al., “The Kaldi Speech Recognition Toolkit,” in Proc.
of ASRU, 2011.
[36] M. Ravanelli, L. Cristoforetti, R. Gretter, M. Pellin, A. Sosi, and
M. Omologo, “The DIRHA-English corpus and related tasks for
distant-speech recognition in domestic environments,” in Proc. of
ASRU, 2015, pp. 275–282.
[37] M. Ravanelli, P. Svaizer, and M. Omologo, “Realistic multimicrophone data simulation for distant speech recognition,” in
Proc. of INTERSPEECH, 2016.
[38] T. Moon, H. Choi, H. Lee, and I. Song, “RNNDROP: A novel
dropout for RNNS in ASR,” in Proc. of ASRU, 2015, pp. 65–70.
[39] X. Glorot and Y. Bengio, “Understanding the difficulty of training
deep feedforward neural networks,” in Proc. of AISTATS, 2010,
pp. 249–256.
[40] M. Ravanelli, P. Brakel, M. Omologo, and Y. Bengio, “Batchnormalized joint training for dnn-based distant speech recognition,” in Proc. of SLT, 2016.
[41] Y. Bengio, J. Louradour, R. Collobert, and J. Weston, “Curriculum
learning,” in Proc. of ICML, 2009, pp. 41–48.
[42] Theano Development Team, “Theano: A Python framework for
fast computation of mathematical expressions,” arXiv e-prints,
vol. abs/1605.02688, May 2016.
| 9cs.NE
|
1
Collective Stochastic Discrete Choice
Problems:
arXiv:1604.08136v3 [cs.SY] 17 Aug 2017
A Min-LQG Game Formulation
Rabih Salhab, Roland P. Malhamé and Jerome Le Ny
Abstract
We consider a class of dynamic collective choice models with social interactions, whereby a large
number of non-uniform agents have to individually settle on one of multiple discrete alternative choices,
with the relevance of their would-be choices continuously impacted by noise and the unfolding group
behavior. For example, a large collection of geographically dispersed micro robots might need to gather,
in a self organized mode and with least energy expenditure, at various known potential sites of interest,
where groups of sufficient size would be required to perform collective tasks, such as search and
rescue. This class of problems is modeled here as a so-called Min-LQG game, i.e., a linear quadratic
Gaussian dynamic and non-cooperative game, with an additional combinatorial aspect in that it includes
a final choice-related minimization in its terminal cost. The presence of this minimization term is key
to enforcing some specific discrete choice by each individual agent. The theory of mean field games is
invoked to generate a class of decentralized agent feedback control strategies which are then shown to
converge to an exact Nash equilibrium of the game as the number of players increases to infinity. A key
building block in our approach is an explicit solution to the problem of computing the best response
of a generic agent to some arbitrarily posited smooth mean field trajectory. Ultimately, an agent is
shown to face a continuously revised discrete choice problem, where greedy choices dictated by current
conditions must be constantly balanced against the risk of the future process noise upsetting the wisdom
of such decisions. Even though an agent’s ultimately chosen alternative is random and dictated by its
entire noise history and initial state, the limiting infinite population macroscopic behavior can still be
predicted. It is shown that any Nash equilibrium of the game is defined by an a priori computable
This work was supported by NSERC under Grants 6820-2011 and 435905-13. The authors are with the department of
Electrical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal and with GERAD, Montreal, QC H3T-1J4, Canada {rabih.salhab,
roland.malhame, jerome.le-ny}@polymtl.ca.
August 21, 2017
DRAFT
2
probability matrix characterizing the manner in which the agent population ultimately splits among the
available alternatives. For the scalar binary choice case with uniform dynamics and cost functions, we
propose a numerical scheme to compute this probability matrix and the associated decentralized Nash
strategies. The results are illustrated through simulations.
Index Terms
Mean Field Games, Stochastic Optimal Control, Discrete Choice Models.
I. I NTRODUCTION
Discrete choice problems arise in situations where an individual makes a choice among a
discrete set of alternatives, such as modes of transportation [1], entry and withdrawal from
the labor market, or residential locations [2]. In some situations, the individuals’ choices are
considerably influenced by the social behavior. For example, in schools, teenagers’ decisions to
smoke are affected by some personal factors, as well as by their peers’ behavior [3].
In this paper, we study a discrete choice problem for a large population of agents in a dynamic
setting, capturing in particular the influence of the population’s state and the efforts that must
be exerted over time by an individual before reaching a decision. For example, as in [4]–[6], a
group of robots exploring an unknown terrain might need to move within a finite time horizon
from their initial positions towards one of multiple sites of interest. While moving, each robot
optimizes its efforts to remain close to the group and to arrive at the end of the time horizon in the
vicinity of one of the predefined sites. The group may split, but the size of the subgroups should
remain large enough to perform some collective tasks, such as search and rescue. Our model
could also be used to study a mechanistic representation of opinion crystallization in elections
[7], [8], where voters continuously update their opinions until forming a final decision regarding
who they should vote for. Along the path to choose a candidate, changing one’s decision requires
an effort, but at the same time, deviations from the others’ opinions involve a discomfort.
McFadden laid in [9] the theoretical foundations of static discrete choice models, where an
agent chooses among a finite set of alternatives the one that maximizes its utility. This utility
depends on some potentially observable attributes (such as the agent’s financial status in the
example of residential location choice) that dictate a deterministic trend in the choice, and other
attributes idiosyncratic to that agent, which are not known by the economist or social planner
August 21, 2017
DRAFT
3
carrying out the macroscopic analysis, although they may influence the choice. As a result,
utility is defined as the sum of a known deterministic term plus a random term. Later, Rust [10]
introduced a dynamic discrete choice model involving a Markov decision process for each agent.
While peer pressure effects are absent in Rust’s and McFadden’s models, Brock and Durlauf [11]
discuss a discrete choice problem with social interactions modeled as a static noncooperative
game, where a large number of agents have to choose between two alternatives while being
influenced by the average of the choices. The authors analyze the model using an approach
similar to that of a static Mean Field Game (MFG), and inspired by statistical mechanics.
The Brock-Durlauf model includes peer influence but is static, and in Rust’s model, the
agents are required to make a choice repeatedly at each discrete time period but under no
social influence. In our model, the agents are instead continuously reassessing the adequacy of
their would-be choices and current actions along their random state-space path, up until the
end of the control horizon, at which point their ultimate choice of alternative becomes fully
crystallized. Thus, our formulation helps in modeling situations where alternative choices are
identified as potential destination points in a suitable state space (e.g., physical space in the
robotics example, or opinion space in the election example), and implementation of a given choice
involves movement towards a final destination state, requiring control effort and constrained by
specific dynamics.
Recently, we introduced a related dynamic collective choice model with social interactions in
[12]–[14]. In these articles, we study using the MFG methodology a dynamic game involving a
large number of players choosing between multiple destination points. The agents’ dynamics are
deterministic with random initial conditions. We show that multiple approximate (epsilon) Nash
equilibria may exist, each characterized by a vector describing the way the population splits
between the alternatives. The strategies developed in these papers are open loop decentralized
policies, in the sense that to make its choice of trajectory and destination, an agent needs to know
only its initial state and the initial distribution of the population. In particular, in this formulation
each agent can commit from the start to its final choice, which implies that the model with
deterministic dynamics is not sufficiently rich to fully capture opinion change phenomena. In
contrast, we consider here the fully stochastic case where a large number of players moving
according to a set of controlled diffusion processes should lie at time T in the vicinity of one
of multiple predefined destination points. Along their path, they are influenced by the average
August 21, 2017
DRAFT
4
state of the population and try to develop as little effort as possible to approach one of these
destinations. By introducing noise in the dynamics we can model for example the unexpected
events that influence a voter’s opinion during electoral campaigns or the random forces that
perturb a robot’s trajectory while choosing a site to visit. The presence of this noise requires
the agents to use bona fide feedback strategies and prevents them from committing to a choice
before the final time. However, one can still anticipate asymptotically the manner in which an
infinite population splits among the set of alternatives.
A. Mean Field Game Methodology and Contributions of This Paper
The MFG methodology that we again follow in this paper was introduced in a series of
papers by Huang et al. [15]–[17], and independently by Lions and Lasry [18]–[20]. It is a
powerful technique to analyze dynamic games involving a large number of agents anonymously
interacting through their mean field, i.e., the empirical distributions of the agents’ states. Analysis
starts by considering the limiting case of a continuum of agents. For agents evolving according to
diffusion processes, the equilibrium of the game can be shown to be characterized by the solution
of two coupled partial differential equations (PDE), a Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) equation
propagating backwards and a Fokker-Planck (FP) equation propagating forwards. Indeed, the
former characterizes the agents’ best response to some posited candidate mean field trajectory,
while the latter propagates the would-be resulting mean field when all agents implement the
computed best responses. Consistency requires that sustainable mean field trajectories, if they
exist, be replicated in the process. Limiting equilibria are thus required to satisfy a system of
fixed point equations, herein given by the coupled HJB-FP equations. The corresponding best
responses, when applied to the finite population, constitute approximate Nash equilibria (-Nash
equilibria) [16], [17], in the following sense.
Definition 1: Consider N agents, a set of strategy profiles S = S1 × . . . × SN , and for each
agent i, a cost function Ji (u1 , . . . , uN ), for (u1 , . . . , uN ) ∈ S. A strategy profile (u∗1 , . . . , u∗N ) ∈ S
is called an -Nash equilibrium with respect to the costs Ji if there exists an > 0 such that,
for any fixed 1 ≤ i ≤ N , for all ui ∈ Si , we have Ji (ui , u∗−i ) ≥ Ji (u∗i , u∗−i ) − .
The main contributions and structure of the paper are described next. In Section II, we present
the mathematical formulation of our multi-agent dynamic discrete choice problem. Then in
Section III, we postulate a known trajectory for the agents population mean state, and compute
August 21, 2017
DRAFT
5
the best response strategy of a generic agent. This involves solving a modified version of the
standard Linear Quadratic Gaussian (LQG) optimal tracking problem, which we call the MinLQG optimal tracking problem, where the final cost is replaced by a minimum of l distances to
capture the discrete choice between l alternatives. We give an explicit expression for the generic
agent’s best response (Min-LQG optimal control law), and show that at each instant, it can be
interpreted as a static discrete choice model [9], where the cost for the agent of choosing one
of the alternatives includes an additional term that increases with the risk of being driven to the
other alternatives by the process noise.
In Section IV we introduce the mean field equations, which allow us to compute the admissible
population distribution trajectories. By exploiting the relationship between dynamic programming
and the stochastic maximum principle, we establish a one-to-one map between the solutions of
the mean field equations and the fixed points of a finite dimensional map. The latter characterizes
the way the population splits between the alternatives. We show the existence of a fixed point for
this map and propose in the binary choice case a numerical scheme to compute it. Our model
lies somewhere between the MFG LQG models studied in [15], [16] and the fully nonlinear
MFGs considered in [17]–[20]. On the one hand, in the LQG case the optimal strategies are
linear feedback policies, whereas in our case they are nonlinear. On the other hand, an explicit
solution in the general nonlinear case is not possible, while we provide in this paper an explicit
form of the optimal strategies. Moreover, the existence and uniqueness of solutions of the mean
field equations are shown in the general case under some strong regularity and boundedness
conditions on the dynamics and cost coefficients [17]–[20]. In this paper, however, the quadratic
running cost and linear dynamics make it possible to relax these assumptions.
Finally, Section V discusses some numerical simulations illustrating the results, and Section
VI presents our conclusions. Overall, the paper develops a set of decentralized closed-loop
strategies forming an approximate Nash equilibrium for our multi-agent dynamic discrete choice
problem. This equilibrium converges to an exact Nash equilibrium as the size of the population
increases to infinity. To compute its optimal control at each time, an agent only needs to know
its current individual state and the initial distribution of the population, which could be learned
by a consensus-like algorithm for example [21]. The rationality assumption in MFGs allows us
to drastically reduce the amount of coordination needed between the players, by predicting the
evolution of the population distribution. In practice, with a finite number of players, errors in
August 21, 2017
DRAFT
6
this prediction build up over time, but could be corrected by periodic communication between
agents to re-estimate their current distribution.
B. Notation
Given an Euclidean space X, B(c, r) denotes the ball of radius r centered at c, xk the k-th
element of x ∈ X, and x−i the vector (x1 , . . . , xi−1 , xi+1 , . . . , xN ). ⊗ denotes the Kronecker
product. The n×n identity matrix is In , M 0 denotes the transpose of a matrix M , Tr(M ) its trace
and |M | its determinant. The notations M 0 and M 0 stand respectively for M positive
q
definite and positive semi-definite. Given an n×n matrix Q 0 and x ∈ Rn , 12 x0 Qx is denoted
by kxkQ . The minimum and maximum eigenvalues of a square matrix Q are written λmin (Q)
and λmax (Q). Let X and Y be two subsets of Euclidean spaces. The set of functions from X to
Y is denoted by Y X . ∂A, Int(A) and Ā denote respectively the boundary, interior and closure
of a subset A ⊂ X. C(X) refers to the set of Rn -valued continuous functions on X with the
standard supremum norm k.k∞ , and C i,j (X × Y ) to the set of real-valued continuous functions
f (x, y) on X × Y such that the first i partial derivatives with respect to the x variable and the
first j partial derivatives with respect to the y variable are continuous. The normal distribution
of mean µ and covariance matrix Σ is denoted by N (µ, Σ).
II. M ATHEMATICAL M ODEL
We present in this section the dynamic collective choice model with social interactions. We
consider a dynamic noncooperative game involving a large number N of players with the
following stochastic dynamics:
dxi (t) = (Ai xi (t) + Bi ui (t)) dt + σi dwi (t),
(1)
for 1 ≤ i ≤ N , where Ai ∈ Rn×n , Bi ∈ Rn×m , σi ∈ Rn×n , and {wi , 1 ≤ i ≤ N } are
N independent Brownian motions in Rn on a probability space (Ω, F, P, {Ft }t∈[0,T ] ), where
{Ft }t∈[0,T ] is the Brownian filtration generated by {wi , 1 ≤ i ≤ N } [22, Section 2.7]. In the
remaining of the paper, P(A) denotes the probability of an event A, E(X) the expectation of a
random variable X and M([0, T ], Rn ) the set of progressively measurable Rn -valued functions
with respect to the filtration {Ft }t∈[0,T ] . We assume that the matrices σi , 1 ≤ i ≤ N , are invertible
and that the initial conditions {xi (0), 1 ≤ i ≤ N } are independent and identically distributed
August 21, 2017
DRAFT
7
(i.i.d.) and also independent of {wi , 1 ≤ i ≤ N }. Moreover, we assume that Ekxi (0)k2 < ∞.
The vector xi (t) ∈ Rn is the state of player i at time t and ui (t) ∈ Rm its control input. Let
pj , 1 ≤ j ≤ l, be l points in Rn . Each player is associated with the following individual cost
functional:
Z
Ji (xi (0), ui , u−i ) = E
0
T
kxi −
x̄k2Qi +kui k2Ri
dt + min kxi (T ) −
1≤j≤l
pj k2Mi
xi (0) ,
(2)
where T > 0, Qi 0, Ri 0 and Mi 0. Along the path, the running cost encourages the
P
players to remain grouped around the average of the population x̄(t) := N
i=1 xi (t)/N , which
captures the social effect, and to develop as little effort as possible. The form of the final cost
captures the discrete choice aspect, if we assume Mi large. That is, a player i at time T should
be close to one of the destination points pj ∈ Rn , otherwise it is strongly penalized. Hence,
the overall individual cost captures the problem faced by each agent of deciding between l
alternatives, while trying to remain close to the mean population trajectory.
The players interact through the average x̄ of the population. Even though the running cost
is linear and quadratic, the minimum term in the final cost changes drastically the analysis of
the game with respect to the standard LQG MFG problems [15], [16]. In fact, as shown later
in (14), the optimal strategies are nonlinear feedback policies, whereas they are linear in the
standard LQG MFG problems. Moreover, to anticipate the mean trajectory x̄, the players need
in the LQG case to know only the initial mean of the population. In our case, they need to know
the full initial distribution in order to compute a solution of the nonlinear mean field equations
defined later in (24).
Let us denote the individual parameters θi := (Ai , Bi , σi , Qi , Ri , Mi ). We assume that there
are k types of agents, that is, θi takes values in a finite set {Θ1 , . . . , Θk }, which does not
depend on the size of the population N . As N tends to infinity, it is convenient to represent
the limiting sequence of (θi )i=1,...,N by realizations of a random vector θ, which takes values
in the same finite set {Θ1 , . . . , Θk }. Let us denote the empirical measure of the sequence θi
P
N
as PθN (Θs ) = 1/N N
i=1 1{θi =Θs } for s = 1, . . . , k. We assume that Pθ has a weak limit
Pθ = (α1 , . . . , αk ) as N → ∞ For further discussions about this assumption, one can refer to
[24].
We define the set of admissible control laws for each agent as follows
Z T
m
2
U = u ∈ M([0, T ], R ) E
ku(s)k ds < ∞, .
(3)
0
August 21, 2017
DRAFT
8
We define the set of admissible Markov policies
n
n
L = u ∈ (Rm )[0,T ]×R |∃L1 > 0, ∀(t, x) ∈ [0, T ] × Rn , ku(t, x)k≤ L1 (1 + kxk), and
o (4)
∀r > 0, T 0 ∈ (0, T ), ∃L2 > 0, ∀k(x, y)k≤ r, t ∈ [0, T 0 ], ku(t, x) − u(t, y)k≤ L2 kx − yk .
If u ∈ L, then the stochastic differential equation (SDE) (1), with ui equal to u(t, xi ), has a unique
strong solution [22, Section 5.2]. As shown below in Theorem 6, the developed strategies form
−Nash equilibria with respect to the space of admissible actions U. Moreover, these strategies
can be expressed as Markov policies (feedback policies), see (14).
III. T HE “M IN -LQG” O PTIMAL T RACKING P ROBLEM
AND THE
G ENERIC AGENT ’ S B EST R ESPONSE
Following the MFG approach, we start by assuming a continuum of agents for which one
can ascribe a deterministic macroscopic behavior x̄ (posited mean population state), which is
supposed known in this section. The problem of determining x̄ is treated in Section IV. In order
to compute its best response to x̄, a generic agent with parameters θ = (A, B, σ, Q, R, M ) ∈
{Θ1 , . . . , Θk } solves the following optimal control problem, which we call the “Min-LQG”
optimal tracking problem:
T
Z
inf J (x(0), u, x̄) = inf E
u∈U
u∈U
kx −
x̄k2Q +kuk2R
0
dt + min kx(T ) −
j=1,...,l
pj k2M
x(0)
(5)
s.t. dx(t) = (Ax(t) + Bu(t)) dt + σdw(t),
where w is a Brownian motion in Rn on the probability space (Ω, F, P) and x(0) is a random
vector independent of w and distributed according to the known distribution of the agents’ initial
and
states. Herein, ∂h(t,x)
∂x
∂ 2 h(t,x)
∂x2
will denote respectively the gradient and Hessian matrix of the
real function h with respect to x ∈ Rn . The optimal cost-to-go function of (5) satisfies the
following HJB equation [25]
∂V
∂V
1
−
= x0 A0
−
∂t
∂x
2
V (T, x) = min kx −
1≤j≤l
∂V
∂x
pj k2M ,
0
2
1
0∂ V
BR B
+ Tr σ
σ + kx − x̄k2Q
2
∂x
2
∂x
−1
0 ∂V
(6)
n
∀x ∈ R .
In the following, we linearize equation (6) under appropriate conditions, using a generalized
Hopf-Cole transformation [26, Section 4.4]. Moreover, we derive an explicit formula for the
August 21, 2017
DRAFT
9
solution of (6) and the min-LQG optimal control law. The results of this section are proved in
Appendix A.
The following notation is used in the remaining of the paper. We define x(j) , u(j) and Vj to
be the optimal state trajectory, optimal control law and optimal cost-to-go of the LQG tracking
problem that the generic agent must solve when pj is the only available alternative, that is, (5)
with pk = pj , for all k ∈ {1, . . . , l}. Recall that [27, Chapter 6]
1
Vj (t, x) = x0 Π(t)x + x0 βj (t) + δj (t)
2
u(j) (t, x) = −R−1 B 0 (Π(t)x + βj (t))
dx(j) (t) = Ax(j) (t) + Bu(j) t, x(j) (t) dt + σdw(j) (t),
(7)
(8)
(9)
where Π, βj and δj are the unique solutions of
d
Π(t) = Π(t)BR−1 B 0 Π(t) − A0 Π(t) − Π(t)A − Q,
dt
0
d
βj (t) = − A − BR−1 B 0 Π(t) βj (t) + Qx̄(t),
dt
d
1
1
δj (t) = βj (t)0 BR−1 B 0 βj (t) − Tr(σ 0 Π(t)σ) − kx̄(t)k2Q ,
dt
2
2
(10)
with Π(T ) = M, βj (T ) = −M pj and δj (T ) = kpj k2M .
Remark 1: The final cost in (5) is non-smooth. Hence, the corresponding HJB equation (6) and
its transformed parabolic equation (30) below have non-smooth terminal conditions. However, as
shown later in Lemma 8, these partial differential equations (PDEs) smooth out their solutions,
i.e., the only non-smoothness occurs at the terminal time. Hence, all the PDE solutions in the
remaining sections are to be understood in the strong sense.
In the following, we denote by Wj , for j ∈ {1, . . . , l}, the Voronoi cell associated with pj ,
that is, Wj = {x ∈ Rn such that kx − pj kM ≤ kx − pk kM , for all 1 ≤ k ≤ l}. We define for all
j ∈ {1, . . . , l} the following notation for the conditional probability of an agent following the
control law u(j) to be in the Voronoi cell j at time T if its state at time t is x
gj (t, x) , P x(j) (T ) ∈ Wj x(j) (t) = x ,
(11)
where x(j) is defined in (9). To linearize and solve the HJB equation (6) using the Hopf-Cole
transformation (see Appendix A), we make the following assumption.
Assumption 1: We assume that there exists a scalar η > 0 such that BR−1 B 0 = ησσ 0 .
August 21, 2017
DRAFT
10
Remark 2: Note the following:
i. Assumption 1 always holds in the scalar case (n = m = 1).
ii. If η exists, then it is strictly positive.
iii. If η exists, since we assumed that σ is invertible, so is BR−1 B 0 , and thus ker B 0 = {0}.
In particular, the dimension of control space is greater or equal to that of the state space
(m ≥ n). Then we must choose R = η1 B 0 (σσ 0 )−1 B, for some η > 0.
iv. Assumption 1 is satisfied in particular if B = R = σ = In , a situation that has been studied
previously in the context of other mean-field games (with A = 0) using the Hopf-Cole
transformation, see [28, Chapter 2] and the references therein.
We now state the main result of this section.
Theorem 1: Under Assumption 1, the HJB equation (6) has a unique solution (t, x) 7→ V (t, x)
in C 1,2 ([0, T ) × Rn ) ∩ C([0, T ] × Rn ), defined as
!
l
X
1
exp (−ηVj (t, x)) gj (t, x) , ∀(t, x) ∈ [0, T ) × Rn
V (t, x) = − log
η
j=1
(12)
V (T, x) = min kx − pj k2M , ∀x ∈ Rn ,
j=1,...,l
where Vj and x(j) are defined in (7) and (9).
Having solved the HJB equation related to the Min-LQG optimal control problem (5), we
now prove the existence of a unique optimal control law. We define the following function:
u∗ (t, x) = −R−1 B 0
∂V
,
∂x
t ∈ [0, T )
(13)
u∗ (T, x) = 0.
Theorem 2: The following statements hold:
i. The function u∗ defined in (13) has on [0, T ) × Rn the following form:
u∗ (t, x) =
l
X
exp (−ηVj (t, x)) gj (t, x)
Pl
j=1
k=1
exp (−ηVk (t, x)) gk (t, x)
u(j) (t, x),
(14)
with Vj , u(j) defined in (7) and (8).
ii. u∗ is an admissible Markov policy.
iii. u∗ (t, x∗ (t, w)) is the unique optimal control law of (5), where x∗ (t, w) is the unique strong
solution of the SDE in (5) with u equal to u∗ (t, x).
August 21, 2017
DRAFT
11
In the degenerate case with σ = 0, it is shown in [12]–[14] that the optimal strategy of an
agent i in the Min-LQG problem is equal to u(j) (the optimal strategy in the presence of only
one alternative pj ) if the Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) control problem associated with pj
is the least costly starting from xi (0). Therefore, a generic agent commits from the start to its
final choice based on its initial state. When σ 6= 0, the generic agent can no longer be “decisive”.
Its optimal control law (14) is a convex combination of the optimal policies u(j) , j = 1, . . . , l.
The weights of u(j) form a spatio-temporal Gibbs distribution [29], which puts more mass on
the less costly and risky destinations. A destination pj is considered riskier in state x at time t if
the Brownian motion has a higher chance of driving the state of an agent closer to a destination
different from pj at time T , when this agent implements u(j) from (x, t) onwards.
We claim in Section II that the final cost forces the agents to be close to one of the destination
points at time T . In the following Lemma, we show in fact that in the scalar case, the probability
that an agent is close to one of the desitnation points increases with the final cost’s coefficient
M . The result is proved for paths x̄ that are uniformly bounded with respect to M , a property
that is shown to hold later in Theorem 5 for the fixed point paths x̄.
Lemma 3: Suppose that the paths x̄ are uniformly bounded with respect to M for the norm
12
R
T
2
. Then, for any > 0,
k.k
dt
0
σ 2 log M
1
+
P (|x∗ (T ) − pj |> , ∀1 ≤ j ≤ l) = o
.
M
2 M
In the rest of this section, we discuss the relation between our solution to the Min-LQG optimal
control problem in the scalar binary choice case and the solution of static discrete choice models.
We start by recalling some facts about the static models. In the standard binary discrete choice
models, a generic person chooses between two alternatives 1 and 2. The cost paid by this person
when choosing an alternative j is defined by vj = k(j) + ν, where k(j) is a deterministic
function that depends on personal publicly observable attributes and on alternative j, while ν
is a random variable accounting for personal idiosyncrasies unobservable by the social planner.
When ν is distributed according to the extreme value distribution [9], then the probability that
a cost-minimizing generic person chooses an alternative j is equal to Pj =
August 21, 2017
exp(−k(j))
.
exp(−k(1))+exp(−k(2))
DRAFT
12
Now, the Min-LQG optimal control law (14) can be written as follows:
exp −η Ṽ1 (t, x)
u(1) (t, x)
u∗ (t, x) =
exp −η Ṽ1 (t, x) + exp −η Ṽ2 (t, x)
exp −η Ṽ2 (t, x)
u(2) (t, x),
+
exp −η Ṽ1 (t, x) + exp −η Ṽ2 (t, x)
(15)
where
Ṽj (t, x) = Vj (t, x) −
1
log (gj (t, x)) ,
η
j = 1, 2.
(16)
Here Vj (t, x) is the expected cost paid by a generic agent if pj is the only available alternative,
and u(j) (t, x) is the corresponding optimal policy. In the presence of two alternatives, the optimal
policy at time t is given by (15), which can be interpreted as a mixed strategy between two
pure strategies u(1) (t, x) (picking alternative p1 ) and u(2) (t, x) (picking alternative p2 ). Within
this framework, denoting by −j the alternative other than j, a generic agent at time t chooses
the alternative pj with probability
exp −η Ṽj (t, x)
.
P rj =
exp −η Ṽj (t, x) + exp −η Ṽ−j (t, x)
Thus, the Min-LQG problem can be viewed at each time t ∈ [0, T ] as a static discrete choice
problem, where the cost of choosing alternative pj includes an additional term − η1 log (gj (t, x))
which goes to zero when the probability gj (t, x) of landing inside of the Voronoi cell Wj
associated with alternative j at time T approaches one. In effect, this additional term measures
the expected cost due to the risk inherent to an early choice, i.e., one based on a premature
decision at time t < T in favor of one alternative, for example alternative pj , thus applying all
the way the pure strategy u(j) (t, x), while ignoring the possibility that by time T , the Brownian
motion could drive the agent’s state toward the −j alternative.
IV. T HE M EAN F IELD E QUATIONS AND T HE F IXED P OINT P ROBLEM
In Section III, we assumed the mean trajectory x̄ known and we computed the generic agent’s
best response to it, which is given by (14). In the following, a superscript s refers to an agent
with parameters Θs ∈ {Θ1 , . . . , Θk }. We write us∗ (t, x, x̄) instead of us∗ (t, x) to emphasize the
dependence on x̄. We now seek a sustainable macroscopic behavior x̄, in the sense that it
August 21, 2017
DRAFT
13
is replicated by the mean of the generic agent’s state under its best response to it. Thus, an
admissible x̄ satisfies the following Mean Field equations:
x̄(t) =
k
X
αs x̄s (t), with x̄s = E[xs∗ ], 1 ≤ s ≤ k,
(17)
s=1
dxs∗ (t) = (As xs∗ (t) + B s us∗ (t, xs∗ (t), x̄)) dt + σ s dws (t),
where xs∗ (0), 1 ≤ s ≤ k, are independent and identically distributed according to the initial
distribution of the players, i.e., the distribution of xi (0), αs are defined in Section II and
{w1 , . . . , wk } are k independent Brownian motions, assumed independent of {x1∗ (0), . . . , xk∗ (0)}.
Solving (17) directly is no easy task. Indeed, this is an n × k nonlinear Mckean-Vlasov
equation [17], where the drift term depends on the joint probability law of the k types of generic
agents through the mean trajectory x̄. However, we derive in Lemma 4 below an equivalent
representation for a solution x̄ of (17), based on the solution of a deterministic optimal control
problem, consisting of two linear forward-backward ODEs (see (19a)-(19b) below), with a
nonlinear coupling in the boundary condition (see (20a)-(20b)) through what we call a “Choice
Distribution Matrix” (CDM). A CDM is a k × l row stochastic matrix with its (s, j) entry equal
to the probability that the generic agent of type s is at time T closer (in the sense of the M weighted l2 norm) to pj than any of the other alternatives when it optimally responds to x̄.
Equations (19a)-(19b) are respectively the expectations of the generic agents’ state (see (1)) and
co-state equations (see (34)), together with that of their boundary conditions (see (35)), when
the input in (1) associated with the agents’ best response is expressed in terms of the co-state.
The state and co-state equations follow from the stochastic maximum principle of the Min-LQG
problem, which we derive in Lemma 9 in Appendix B. The advantage of this new representation
is that if one considers the CDM in the q̄(T ) boundary condition as a parameter (say any k × l
row stochastic matrix), then equations (19a)-(19b) become totally linear. As a result, they have
under Assumption 2 below an explicit solution (the term that multiplies P1 in (22)) parametrized
by the stochastic matrix. This implies that the solutions x̄ of the mean field equations lies in the
family of paths (22) parametrized by the k × l row stochastic matrices. Conversely, in order to
have a path x̄Λ parametrized by some candidate Λ be a solution of (17), consistency requires
that Λ be equal to the associated CDM as expressed in (20a) when the generic agents optimally
respond to x̄Λ . This is equivalent to requiring that Λ be a fixed point of the finite dimensional
August 21, 2017
DRAFT
14
map F defined by (23). Indeed, F maps a row stochastic matrix Λ to the CDM when the generic
agents optimally respond to x̄Λ .
In effect, we establish that there is a one to one map between the solutions x̄ of (17) and
the fixed points of the finite dimensional map F . Theorem 5 below summarizes the related
results: point (i) of the theorem states the existence of the one-to-one map in question, while
point (ii) states that there is at least one fixed point of F . Thus, a Nash equilibrium CDM exists
(equivalently a solution of (17)) characterizing the way an infinite population, with the same
distribution of heterogeneous parameters as the original large but finite population, would split
between the destination points. The above results are proved in Appendix B.
In the following, we adopt the following notations. Let X̄ = (x̄1 , . . . , x̄k ), X∗ = (x1∗ , . . . , xk∗ ),
U∗ = (u1∗ , . . . , uk∗ ), W = (w1 , . . . , wk ), and p = (p1 , . . . , pl ). Let A, B, Q, R, M and σ be the
block-diagonal matrices diag(A1 , . . . , Ak ), diag(B 1 , . . . , B k ), diag(Q1 , . . . , Qk ), diag(R1 , . . . , Rk ),
diag(M 1 , . . . , M k ) and diag(σ 1 , . . . , σ k ) respectively. Define L = Ink − 1k ⊗ P1 , where 1k is a
column of k ones and P1 = Pθ0 ⊗ In where Pθ is defined in Section II. The following assumption
guarantees the existence and uniqueness of a solution for (19a)-(19b) whenever the CDM in the
q̄(T ) boundary condition is considered as a parameter.
Assumption 2: We assume the existence of a solution on [0, T ] to the following (nonsymmetric)
Riccati equation:
d
π = −A0 π − πA + πBR−1 B 0 π + QL,
dt
π(T ) = M.
(18)
Note that if Assumption 2 is satisfied, the solution of (18) is unique as a consequence of the
smoothness of the right-hand side of (18) with respect to π [30, Section 2.4, Lemma 1]. For a
uniform population, i.e., k = 1, we have L = 0 and hence Assumption 2 is always satisfied [31,
Section 2.3]. For more details about Assumption 2, one can refer to [32].
Lemma 4: Under Assumption 2, x̄ satisfies (17) if and only if it satisfies the following equations
d
X̄(t) = AX̄(t) − BR−1 B 0 q̄(t),
dt
d
q̄(t) = −A0 q̄(t) + QLX̄(t),
dt
x̄(t) = P1 X̄(t),
August 21, 2017
(19a)
(19b)
(19c)
DRAFT
15
with X̄(0) = EX(0) and q̄(T ) = M X̄(T ) − Λ ⊗ In p , where the CDM Λ is defined as follows:
Λsj = P(xs∗ (T ) ∈ Wj ),
1 ≤ s ≤ k, 1 ≤ j ≤ l
dX∗ (t) = (AX∗ (t) + BU∗ (t, X∗ (t), x̄)) dt + σdW (t).
(20a)
(20b)
We are now ready to state the main result of this paper, which asserts that there exists an
admissible mean trajectory x̄ satisfying (17). Moreover, it characterizes each admissible x̄ by a
matrix Λ, where Λsj given in (20a) is the probability that an agent of type s optimally tracking
x̄ is at time T closer to pj than any of the other destination points. This matrix is a fixed point
of a well defined finite dimensional map.
The following functions are used to compute the solution of (19a)-(19b), where Λ is considered
as a parameter. Under Assumption 2, we define R1 and R2 such that, for all s ≥ 0,
d
R1 (t, s) = A − BR−1 B 0 π(t) R1 (t, s),
dt
d
R2 (t) = A − BR−1 B 0 π(t) R2 (t)
dt
(21)
+ BR−1 B 0 R1 (T, t)0 M,
with R1 (s, s) = Ink and R2 (0) = 0, where π is the unique solution of (18). We denote by S
the set of k × l row stochastic matrices. For Λ ∈ S, define the function x̄Λ : [0, T ] → Rn by
x̄Λ (t) := P1 (R1 (t, 0)X̄(0) + R2 (t)Λ ⊗ In p).
(22)
Next, define the finite dimensional map F from S into itself such that for all Λ ∈ S,
F (Λ)sj = P(xs,Λ
∗ (T ) ∈ Wj ),
(23)
k,Λ
where X∗Λ = (x1,Λ
∗ , . . . , x∗ ) is the unique strong solution of the following SDE parameterized
by Λ
dX∗Λ (t) = AX∗Λ (t) + BU∗ t, X∗Λ (t), x̄Λ
dt + σdW (t),
with X∗Λ (0) = X∗ (0).
(24)
The map F involves the probability distribution of the process X∗Λ . Hence, to find the value of
F (Λ), one needs to solve the Fokker-Planck equation associated with (24).
Theorem 5: Under Assumption 2, the following statements hold:
(i) x̄ satisfies (17) if and only if
x̄ = x̄Λ
August 21, 2017
(25)
DRAFT
16
where x̄Λ is defined in (22) and Λ is a fixed point of F .
(ii) F is continuous and has at least one fixed point. Equivalently, (17) has at least one solution
x̄.
(iii) For a uniform population, i.e, k=1, the admissible paths x̄ are uniformly bounded with
R
21
T
2
respect to M and Λ ∈ S for the standard L2 norm
k.k dt .
0
Remark 3: In [17], [33], which consider the general MFG theory, the authors show the existence
and uniqueness of solutions for the Mckean-Vlasov equation describing the mean field behavior
via Banach’s [17] or Schauder’s fixed point theorem [33]. In [17], it is assumed that the optimal
control law is regular enough (Lipschitz continuous with respect to the state and the distribution)
in order to define a contraction, while in [33] the result is proved under the assumption of smooth
and convex final cost. In our case, the control law (14) is not Lipschitz continuous with respect
to x̄. Moreover, the final cost is neither smooth nor convex. Hence, the Mckean-Vlasov equation
(17) might have multiple solutions. Indeed, (17) has a number of solutions equal to the number
of fixed points of F .
Having solved the game for a continuum of players, we now return to the practical case of a
finite population of players. Using arguments similar to those in [16, Theorem 5.6], one can
show that the MFG-based decentralized strategies (14), when applied by a finite population,
constitute an −Nash equilibrium.
Theorem 6: The decentralized feedback strategies u∗ defined in (14) for a fixed point path x̄
of (17), when applied by N players with dynamics (1), constitute an N -Nash equilibrium with
respect to the costs (2), where N converges to zero as N increases to infinity.
The set of fixed points of the finite dimensional map F characterizes the game in terms of
the number of distinct −Nash equilibria and the distribution of the choices for each of them. In
fact, Theorem 5 establishes a one to one map between the solutions of the mean field equations
(17) and the set of fixed point CDMs. If Λ is a fixed point of F and the players optimally
respond to the corresponding x̄Λ given by (22), then Λsj is the fraction of agents of type s that
P
go towards pj , and ks=1 αs Λsj is the total fraction of players choosing this alternative. Thus,
to compute a path x̄ satisfying (17), a player computes a fixed point Λ of F and then computes
(22).
Let us now briefly illustrate how to compute a fixed point of F in the scalar binary choice
case for a population with uniform dynamics and cost functions, i.e., n = m = k = 1 and
August 21, 2017
DRAFT
17
l = 2, and initial probability density function p0 . In this case, a pair (r, 1 − r) for r ∈ [0, 1] is a
fixed point of F if and only if r is a fixed point of G, where G(r) = [F (r, 1 − r)]1 . Following
the second point of Theorem 5, F is continuous. As a result, G is a continuous function from
[0, 1] into itself. Thus, we can apply the bisection method to G(r) − r to find a fixed point of
Rc
G, if we can compute the value of G at any r ∈ [0, 1]. But G(r) = −∞ pr (T, x)dx, where
c = (p1 + p2 )/2 and pr (t, x) is the probability density of X (r,1−r) (t) defined by (24), which can
be computed numerically by solving the following Fokker-Planck equation associated to (24),
e.g., via an implicit finite difference scheme [34]
∂ (µ(t, x, r)pr (t, x)) σ 2 ∂ 2 pr (t, x)
∂pr (t, x)
=−
+
,
∂t
∂x
2
∂x2
(26)
with pr (0, x) = p0 (x), ∀x ∈ R. Here µ(t, x, r) = Ax + Bu∗ t, x, x̄(r,1−r) for x̄(r,1−r) (t) =
R1 (t, 0)x̄(0) + R2 (t) (rp1 + (1 − r)p2 ), see (22).
V. S IMULATION R ESULTS
To illustrate the dynamics of our collective decision mechanism, we consider a group of agents
with parameters A = 0.1, B = 0.2, R = 5, M = 500, T = 2 and σ = 1.5. The agents, initially
drawn from the normal distribution N (0.3, 1), choose between the alternatives p1 = −10 and
p2 = 10. At first, we consider a weak social effect (Q = 0.1). Following the numerical scheme
at the end of Section IV, we find a fixed point r = 0.39. Accordingly, a player applying its
decentralized MFG-based strategy is at time T closer to p1 with probability 0.39. Equivalently, if
we draw independently from the initial distribution a large number of players with independent
Wiener processes, then the percentage of players that will be at time T closer to p1 converges to
39% as the size of the population increases to infinity. Thus, the majority of the players choose
p2 . Figure 1 shows the distribution at time t = 0, t = 0.5T and t = T , the mean of a generic
agent, the tracked path (admissible path (25)), and the sample paths of 10 players choosing
between −10 and 10 under the weak social effect. As shown in this figure, the mean replicates
the tracked path computed using the fixed point r = 0.39 and (25).
Figure 2 shows that for sufficiently small values of Q (Q < 21) the fixed points of F are
unique. When the social effect Q exceeds 21, F has three fixed points, where two of them
correspond to consensus on one alternative. Indeed as Q increases arbitrarily, agents essentially
forget temporarily about the final cost, and the problem becomes a classical rendez-vous MFG
August 21, 2017
DRAFT
18
0.4
0.2
0
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
4
2
0
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
20
10
0
-10
-20
Fig. 1. Distribution evolution, mean trajectory, tracked path and sample paths for a weak social effect (Q = 0.1). Here r = 0.39.
where they tend to merge towards each other rapidly. If this occurs around the middle of the
destinations segment, then this is clearly an unstable situation where most of the time, they
end up splitting classically according to initial conditions; however, some large deviations are
possible whereby a significant fraction decides to choose one destination, thus pulling everyone
else towards it, which may help explain the non uniqueness of outcomes. Figure 3 illustrates the
evolution of the distributions that correspond to the first fixed point with Q = 10 and Q = 20.
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Fig. 2. Influence of the coefficient Q on the multiplicity of the fixed points
August 21, 2017
DRAFT
19
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
-20
Fig. 3. Influence of the social effect on the distribution of the agents. Distribution evolution for medium (Q = 10) and strong
(Q = 20) social effects. In the first case, r = 0.2, while in second case, r = 0.02.
To illustrate the effect of the noise intensity on the behavior of the group, we fix Q = 20 and
we increase σ from 1.5 to 5. For σ = 1.5, r = 0.02 (Figure 3), but for σ = 3, r increases to
0.28 (Figure 4) and for σ = 5, r = 0.46 (Figure 4). Thus, the higher the noise the more evenly
distributed the players are between the alternatives.
VI. C ONCLUSION
We study within the framework of mean field game theory a dynamic collective choice model
with social interactions. We introduce the Min-LQG optimal control problem and give an explicit
form of a generic agent’s best response (Min-LQG optimal control law). The Min-LQG problem
can be interpreted at each time step as a static discrete choice model where the cost of choosing
one of the alternatives has an additional term that increases with the risk of being driven by
the process noise to the other alternatives. We show the existence of closed loop decentralized
−Nash strategies. Moreover, we characterize these strategies by a CDM describing the way
August 21, 2017
DRAFT
20
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
-30
Fig. 4. Influence of the noise on the distribution of the agents. Distribution evolution for σ = 3 and σ = 5. In the first case,
r = 0.28, while in the second case, r = 0.46.
the population splits between the alternatives, which is a fixed point of a well defined finite
dimensional map.
A PPENDIX A
In this appendix, we provide the proofs of lemmas and theorems related to a generic agent’s
best response.
Proof of Theorem 1
We start with a technical result on the mean-square convergence of random variables.
Lemma 7: Let I be a closed subset of Rn . Let Xk ∈ Rn be a sequence of random variables
with finite first and second moments. If E[Xk ] =: µk → µ for some vector µ not in I, and
E[kXk − µk k2 ] → 0, then lim P (Xk ∈ I) = 0.
k→∞
August 21, 2017
DRAFT
21
Proof: I ⊂ Rn is a closed set and µ ∈
/ I, so the distance d between µ and I is strictly
positive. Since, µk converges to µ, there exists k0 > 0 such that for all k ≥ 0 and for all x in I
we have kx − µk k≥ d/2. Hence, using Chevyshev’s inequality [35, Theorem 1.6.4],
P (Xk ∈ I) ≤ P (kXk − µk k≥ d/2) ≤
4
E[kXk − µk k2 ],
d2
for all k ≥ k0 . The result follows since the right-hand side of the inequality is assumed to
converge to 0.
The following lemma concerns the regularity of the solution provided in Theorem 1.
Lemma 8: V defined in (12) is in C 1,2 ([0, T ) × Rn ) ∩ C([0, T ] × Rn ).
Proof: Note that for gj defined in (11), we can write
gj (t, x) = P x(j) (T ) ∈ Wj x(j) (t) = x
Z
Z T
1
p
=
exp − y − α(T, t)x +
α(T, τ )BR−1 B 0 βj (τ )dτ
|2πΣt | Wj
t
Z T
α(T, τ )σσ 0 α(T, τ )0 dτ,
for Σt =
2
Σ−1
t
!
dy (27)
t
(j)
where x , Π and βj are defined in (9) and (10), and the matrix-valued function α(t, s) is the
unique solution of
d
α(t, s) = A − BR−1 B 0 Π(t) α(t, s),
dt
(28)
with α(s, s) = In . The expression (27) follows from the fact that the solution of a linear SDE with
deterministic initial condition has a normal distribution [22, Section 2.5]. In view of (12), (27),
and Σt 0 for all t ∈ [0, T ), V is in C 1,2 ([0, T )×Rn ). It remains to show the continuity on {T }×
Rn . We start by considering x ∈ Rn \ ∪lj=1 ∂Wj , and (tk , xk ) ∈ [0, T ) × Rn converging to (T, x).
We have x ∈ Int(Wj0 ) for some j0 ∈ {1, . . . , l}, and x 6∈ Wj for j 6= j0 . In view of (27), gj (tk , xk )
RT
is the probability that a Gaussian vector of mean α(T, tk )xk − tk α(T, τ )BR−1 B 0 βj (τ )dτ (which
converges to x with k) and covariance Σtk (which converges to 0 with k) is in the closed set
Wj . In this way, each j defines a distinct sequence of random variables associated with the
(tk , xk )’s. Now if one considers the closed set I of Lemma 7 to be any of the closed sets Wj ’s
for j 6= j0 , one can conclude from this lemma that gj (tk , xk ) must converge to 0 for j 6= j0 and,
as a consequence, to 1 for j = j0 since the Wj ’s form a partition of the state space. Therefore,
V (tk , xk ) converges to V (T, x). Thus, V is continuous on [0, T ] × Rn \ ∪lj=1 ∂Wj . Finally,
consider a sequence (tk , xk ) ∈ [0, T )×Rn converging to (T, c), with c ∈ ∪lj=1 ∂Wj . We show that
August 21, 2017
DRAFT
22
V (tk , xk ) converges to V (T, c). Up to renumbering the Voronoi cells, we can assume without
loss of generality that c ∈ ∂Wj for all j in {1, . . . , z} and c ∈
/ ∪lj=z+1 Wj , for some 1 ≤ z ≤ l.
We have,
I0 =
l
X
exp (−ηVj (tk , xk )) gj (tk , xk )
j=1
=
z
X
l
X
exp (−ηVj (tk , xk )) gj (tk , xk ) +
j=1
exp (−ηVj (tk , xk )) gj (tk , xk ).
j=z+1
Since c ∈
/ ∪lj=z+1 Wj , one can use an argument similar to that above to show that the second
term of the right-hand side of the second equality converges to 0.
Next, let > 0 and fix r > 0 small enough so that B̄(c, r) ⊂ ∩lj=z+1 Wj
C
. The value of r
will be determined later. The first term can be written
z
X
exp (−ηVj (tk , xk )) gj (tk , xk ) = I1 + I2 ,
j=1
where
I1 =
z
X
(j)
(j)
exp (−ηVj (tk , xk )) P x (T ) ∈ Wj ∩ B̄(c, r) x (tk ) = xk
j=1
I2 =
z
X
exp (−ηVj (tk , xk )) P x(j) (T ) ∈ Wj \ B̄(c, r) x(j) (tk ) = xk .
j=1
By Lemma 7, I2 converges to zero. Next, by solving the linear differential equations in (10) and
replacing the expressions of βj and δj in the expression (27) of gj , one can show that under
Assumption 1
I1 = exp (−ηV0 (tk , xk ))
z Z
X
j=1
fk (y) exp η(kyk2M −ky − pj k2M ) dy,
Wj ∩B̄(c,r)
where fk (y) is the probability density function of the Gaussian distribution of mean α(T, tk )xk −
RT
α(T, τ )BR−1 B 0 β0 (τ )dτ and variance Σtk , and V0 and β0 are equal to Vj and βj defined in
tk
(7)-(10) but for pj = 0. By the definition of c, kc − p1 k2M = · · · = kc − pz k2M . Hence,
z Z
X
2
2
I1 = exp −η(V0 (tk , xk ) − kckM +kc − pj kM )
fk (y)dy
j=1
+ exp (−ηV0 (tk , xk ))
z Z
X
j=1
Wj ∩B̄(c,r)
fk (y)f (y)dy
Wj ∩B̄(c,r)
, I3 + I4 ,
August 21, 2017
DRAFT
23
where f (y) = exp (η(kyk2M −ky − pj k2M )) − exp (η(kck2M −kc − pj k2M )). V0 (tk , xk ) converges to
V0 (T, c) = kck2M fk converges in distribution to a point mass at c, and Wj ∩ B̄(0, c), j = 1, . . . , z,
is a partition of B̄(0, c). Therefore, I3 converges to exp(−ηkc − pj k2M ) = exp(−ηV (T, c)). f
is continuous, and f (c) = 0. Hence, one can choose r small enough so that |f (y)|< for
all y ∈ B̄(c, r). Thus, |I4 |≤ , and lim sup|I0 − exp(−ηV (T, c))|≤ . Since is arbitrary, I0
k
converges to exp(−ηV (T, c)). This proves the result.
To finish the proof of Theorem 1, it remains to show that V satisfies the HJB equation
(6). We define the transformations by a generalized Hopf-Cole transformation [26, Chapter 4Section 4.4] of Vj (t, x), ψj (t, x) = exp (−ηVj (t, x)), for j = 1, . . . , l. Recall [27, Chapter 6]
that the optimal cost-to-go Vj satisfies the HJB equation (6), but with the boundary condition
equal to Vj (T, x) = kx − pj k2M . By multiplying the right-hand and left-hand sides of (6) by
−η exp (−ηVj (t, x)), one obtain that
2
1
∂ψj
0 0 ∂ψj
0 ∂ ψj
=xA
+ Tr σ
σ − ηkx − x̄k2Q ψj
−
∂t
∂x
2
∂x2
0
∂Vj
1 ∂Vj
+ η exp (−ηVj (t, x))
.
BR−1 B 0 − ησσ 0
2 ∂x
∂x
Thus, under Assumption 1, we get
2
∂ψj
1
0 0 ∂ψj
0 ∂ ψj
−
=xA
+ Tr σ
σ − ηkx − x̄k2Q ψj
2
∂t
∂x
2
∂x
ψj (T, x) = exp −ηkx − pj k2M , ∀x ∈ Rn .
(29)
Define ψ(t, x) = exp (−ηV (t, x)) the transformation of V (t, x) defined in (12). Hence, we
Pl
∂ψj
have ψ(t, x) =
j=1 ψj (t, x)gj (t, x). Equation (29), Assumption 1 and the identity ∂x =
−η (Πx + βj ) ψj , where Π and βj are defined in (10), imply
2
∂ψ
1
∂ ψ
0 0 ∂ψ
+xA
+ Tr σ 0 2 σ − ηkx − x̄k2Q ψ
∂t
∂x 2
∂x
2
l
X
0 ∂gj 1
∂gj
−1 0
−1 0
0 ∂ gj
=
+ Ax − BR B Πx − BR B βj
+ Tr σ
σ
ψj .
∂t
∂x
2
∂x2
j=1
The process x(j) satisfies the SDE (9). Therefore, by Kolmogorov’s backward equation [22,
Section 5.B],
2
0 ∂gj 1
∂gj
−1 0
−1 0
0 ∂ gj
+ Ax − BR B Πx − BR B βj
+ Tr σ
σ = 0.
∂t
∂x
2
∂x2
August 21, 2017
DRAFT
24
Hence,
2
∂ ψ
1
∂ψ
0 0 ∂ψ
+xA
+ Tr σ 0 2 σ − ηkx − x̄k2Q ψ = 0.
∂t
∂x 2
∂x
By multiplying the right and left-hand sides of (30) by
1
η
(30)
exp(ηV (t, x)), V (t, x) satisfies (6). The
uniqueness of the solution follows from the uniqueness of solutions to the uniform parabolic
PDE (30) [22, Theorem 7.6].
Proof of Theorem 2
We have
−1
u∗ (t, x) = −R B
+
0 ∂V
∂x
=
l
X
ψj (t, x)gj (t, x)
Pl
j=1
k=1 ψk (t, x)gk (t, x)
1
η
Pl
k=1
ψk (t, x)gk (t, x)
−1
R B
0
l
X
j=1
u(j) (t, x)
ψj (t, x)
∂gj
(t, x).
∂x
In the following we show that the second summand is zero. By the change of variable z =
RT
y − α(T, t)x + t α(T, τ )BR−1 B 0 βj (τ )dτ in (27) and Leibniz integral rule, we have
Z
−α(T, t)
∂gj
2
(t, x) = p
exp − kzkΣ−1
~nj (z)ds(z)
t
∂x
|2πΣt | ∂Wj −α(T,t)x+RtT α(T,τ )BR−1 B 0 βj (τ )dτ
!
Z
Z T
2
−α(T, t)
~nj (y)ds(y),
exp − y − α(T, t)x +
α(T, τ )BR−1 B 0 βj (τ )dτ
=p
|2πΣt | ∂Wj
t
Σ−1
t
where α is defined in (28) and ~nj (y) is the unit normal component of ∂Wj and its translation
RT
∂Wj − α(T, t)x + t α(T, τ )BR−1 B 0 βj (τ )dτ . By solving for βj and δj in (10) and replacing
the solutions in the expressions of the costs Vj defined in (7) and in the derivatives
∂gj
,
∂x
one can
show that under Assumption 1,
l
X
l Z
X
∂gj
ψj (t, x)
(t, x) = K1 (t, x)
exp K2 (t, x, y) + ηky − pj k2M −ηkyk2M ~nj (y)ds(y).
∂x
j=1
j=1 ∂Wj
(31)
where K1 and K2 are functions that do not depend on pj , ∀j ∈ {1, . . . , l}. Note that ∂Wj =
k
k
j
j
∪i=1
Oi , where the disjoint subsets (up to a subset of measure zero) {Oi }i=1
are the common
boundaries of Wj and the adjacent Voronoi cells. If Oi is the common boundary of Wj and some
adjacent Voronoi Cell Wk , then ~nj (y) = −~nk (y) for all y ∈ Oi . Moreover, by the definition of
the Voronoi cells, ky − pj kM = ky − pk kM for all y ∈ Oi . Therefore, the right-hand side of (31)
is equal to zero. Thus, the optimal control u∗ satisfies (14).
August 21, 2017
DRAFT
25
Next, we show that u∗ is an admissible Markov policy, i.e. u∗ ∈ L defined in (4). In view
of (14), the function
∂u∗
∂x
is continuous on [0, T ) × Rn . Therefore, the local Lipschitz condition
holds. Moreover, for all (t, x) ∈ [0, T ] × Rn , we have
ku∗ (t, x)k≤
l
X
l
X
−1 0
(j)
u∗ (t, x) ≤ kR B k lkΠk∞ kxk+
kβj k∞
j=1
!
.
(32)
j=1
Hence, the linear growth condition is satisfied and this proves the result. As a result, sufficient
conditions are satisfied for the SDE defined in (5) and controlled by u∗ (t, x) to have unique
strong solution denoted x∗ (.) [22, Section 5.2].
Finally, by the verification theorem [25, Theorem 4.3.1], we know that u∗ is the unique
optimal control law of (5) if it is the unique minimizer (up to a set of measure 0) of the
, u, t) = (Ax + Bu)0 ∂V
+ kx − x̄k2Q +kuk2R , and if the cost-to-go V (t, x)
Hamiltonian H(x, ∂V
∂x
∂x
has a polynomial growth in x and satisfies (6). For the first condition, we have for Lebesgue×Pa.e (t, ξ) ∈ [0, T ] × Ω (P is the probability measure defined at the beginning of Section II),
∂V
(t, x∗ (t, ξ))
∂x
∂V
= argmin H x∗ (t, ξ),
(t, x∗ (t, ξ)), u, t .
∂x
u∈Rn
u∗ (t, x∗ (t, ξ)) = −R−1 B 0
In fact, the control law defined in (13) minimizes H except on the set {T } × Ω, which has a
Lebesgue × P measure zero. Next, in view of (32), we have for all (t, x) ∈ [0, T ) × Rn
Z kxk
∂V
(t, y) dy ≤ K1 (1 + kxk2 ),
kV (t, x)k≤
∂x
0
for some K1 > 0. Moreover, kV (T, x)k≤ K2 (1 + kxk2 ), for some K2 > 0. Hence, for all
(t, x) ∈ [0, T ] × Rn , kV (t, x)k≤ K (1 + kxk2 ), for some K > 0. Moreover, as established in
Theorem 3, V ∈ C 1,2 ([0, T ) × Rn ) ∩ C([0, T ] × Rn ) satisfies the HJB equation (6). This proves
the result.
A. Proof of Lemma 3
To prove the result, it is sufficient to show that the expectation of the optimal cost EJ∗ (x(0)) ≤
K+
σ2
2
log M , for some K > 0 independent of M . The result is then a direct consequence of
Chebyshev’s inequality
2
1
P min |x∗ (T ) − pj |> ≤ 2 E min |x∗ (T ) − pj |2 ≤
EJ∗ (x(0)).
1≤j≤l
1≤j≤l
M 2
August 21, 2017
DRAFT
26
To prove the boundedness of the cost, we start by the special case where x̄ = 0 and p1 = · · · =
2 RT
pl = 0. The optimal cost is then J∗ (x(0)) = 21 Π(0)x2 (0) + σ2 0 Π(τ )dτ . We now show that
RT
Π(0) is uniformly bounded with M and that 0 Π(τ )dτ is of the order log M for large M . To
prove the uniform boundness of Π(0), we consider the LQR problem
Z T
Q 2 R 2
M
inf JM (y(0) = 1, v(.)) = inf
y + v dt + |y(T )|2
v
v
2
2
2
0
(33)
dy
s.t.
= Ay + Bv,
y(0) = 1.
dt
∗
The optimal cost is JM
= 21 Π(0), where Π is defined in (10). By controllability of (A, B), one can
find a continuous control law v10 that does not depend on M and such that the corresponding
∗
state y10 is at time T at 0. We have 12 Π(0) = JM
≤ JM (1, v10 ). The right hand side of the
inequality is finite and does not depend on M . Hence, Π(0) is uniformly bounded w.r.t. M .
RT
We now prove that 0 Π(τ )dτ is of the order log M for large M . We have for all M ≥ 1,
1
Π(0)
2
∗
∗
≥ JM
= JM
=1 := C > 0. The constant C is independent of M , whenever M > 1.
Moreover, for large, M min Π(t) = Π(0) > C. By dividing by Π(t) on both sides of the
t∈[0,T ]
Riccati equation in (10) and integrating on [0, T ] the right and left hand sides, we get
Z
Z T
b2 T
1
log M − log Π(0) =
Π(τ )dτ − 2aT − q
dτ.
r 0
0 Π(τ )
RT 1
RT
1
By the boundedness of Π(0) and 0 Π(τ
dτ
≤
,
we
have
Π(τ )dτ /log M converges to 1
)
CT
0
as M goes to infinity. Having shown the result for the special case, the case where x̄ 6= 0 and
A
p1 = · · · = pl = p can be proved by making the change of variables x̃ = x − p and ũ = u + B
p
and noting the uniform boundedness of x̄ and that
Z T
Z T
RA2 T 2
M 2
2
2
Q(x̄ − p)2 dt +
p.
EJ∗ (x(0)) ≤ E inf E
{Qx̃ + Rũ }dt + x̃ (T )|x(0) +
ũ
2
B2
0
0
Finally, we conclude the general case by the following inequality
Z T
R 2
M
Q
2
2
EJ∗ (x(0)) ≤ E inf E
{ (x − x̄) + u }dt + (x(T ) − p1 ) |x(0) .
u
2
2
2
0
A PPENDIX B
This appendix includes the proofs of lemmas and theorems related to the existence of a solution
of the mean field equations.
August 21, 2017
DRAFT
27
Proof of Lemma 4
First, we provide in the following lemma a stochastic maximum principle [36] for the “minLQG” optimal control problem. Because of the non-smooth final cost, this result is derived
using the relationship between dynamic programming and the stochastic maximum principle
rather than the variational method used in [36].
2 s
Lemma 9: The processes q s (t), ∂∂xV2 (t, xs∗ (t) , 1 ≤ s ≤ k, with q s (t) =
∂V s
(t, xs∗ (t)),
∂x
the following backward linear SDE:
∂ 2V s
0
− dq s (t) = (As ) q s (t) + Qs (xs∗ (t) − x̄(t)) dt −
((t, xs∗ (t)) σ s dws (t),
∂x2
P
with q s (T ) = M s xs∗ (T ) − lj=1 1Wj (xs∗ (T ))pj .
Proof: The function
Section 3.3.A] to
∂V s
∂x
∂V s
(t, x)
∂x
∂V s
∂x
(34)
is smooth on [0, T ) × Rn . By applying Itô’s formula [22,
(t, xs∗ (t)), and by noting that V s satisfies the HJB equation (6), we have
−dq s (t) = ((As )0 q s (t) + Qs (xs∗ (t) − x̄(t))) dt −
with q s (0) =
satisfy
∂ 2V s
((t, xs∗ (t)) σ s dws (t),
2
∂x
(0, xs∗ (0)). It remains to show that P-a.s
∂V s
lim
(t, xs∗ (t)) = M s
t→T ∂x
xs∗ (T ) −
l
X
!
1Wj (xs∗ (T ))pj
.
(35)
j=1
By Theorem 2, we have on [0, T ) × Rn
l
X
exp −η s Vjs (t, x) gjs (t, x) ∂Vjs
∂V s
(t, x) =
(t, x).
Pl
s
s s
∂x
∂x
k=1 exp (−η Vk (t, x)) gk (t, x)
j=1
Fix j ∈ {1, . . . , l}. By Lemma 7, we have on {xs∗ (T ) ∈ Int(Wj )}, lim gjs (t, xs∗ (t)) = 1 and
t→T
s
s
s
s
lim gk (t, x∗ (t)) = 0, for all k 6= j. Hence, on {x∗ (T ) ∈ Int(Wj )}, we have lim ∂V
(t, xs∗ (t)) =
∂x
t→T
t→T
∂V s
lim ∂xj (t, xs∗ (t)) = M s (xs∗ (T ) − pj ). But, xs∗ is the solution of an SDE with non degenerate
t→T
noise. Therefore, P (xs∗ (T ) ∈ ∂Wj ) = 0. Hence, (35) holds.
Remark 4: The backward SDE (34) is the adjoint equation [36] for the min-LQG optimal
control problem.
We now prove Lemma 4. By taking the expectations on the right and the left hand sides of
P
(34) and the SDE in (17), and in view of ks=1 αs x̄s (t) = x̄, we get the necessary condition. To
prove the sufficient condition, we consider (X̄, x̄, q̄) satisfying (19a)-(20b). We define (x̂s , q̂ s ) =
(Exs∗ , Eq s ), where (xs∗ , q s ) are the s-type generic agent’s optimal state and co-state when tracking
August 21, 2017
DRAFT
28
x̄. We define e = (x̂1 , . . . , x̂k ) − X̄ and q̄e = (q̂ 1 , . . . , q̂ k ) − q̄. By taking expectations on the
right and the left hand sides of (34) and the generic agent’s dynamics, we obtain that
d
e(t) = Ae(t) − BR−1 B 0 q̄e (t),
e(0) = 0
dt
(36)
d
0
q̄e (t) = −A q̄e (t) + QLe(t),
q̄e (T ) = M e(T ).
dt
Under Assumption 2, we define qe0 (t) = π(t)e(t), where π(t) is the unique solution of (18). We
have
d(q̄e −qe0 )
dt
= −(A0 −π(t)BR−1 B 0 )(q̄e −qe0 ), with (q̄e (T )−qe0 (T )) = 0. Hence, q̄e (t) = π(t)e(t).
By replacing q̄e (t) = π(t)e(t) in the forward equation in (36), we obtain that e = 0. Hence, x̄
satisfies (17).
Proof of Theorem 5
Let x̄ be a path satisfying (17). Then, by Lemma 4, x̄ satisfies (19a)-(20b). Under Assumption
2, using arguments similar to those used in Lemma 4 we obtain that (19a) and (19b) has a
unique solution (X̄, q̄). Moreover, q̄ = π X̄ + γ, where π is the unique solution of (18), and γ
is the unique solution of γ̇ = −(A − BR−1 B 0 π)0 γ with γ(T ) = −M Λ ⊗ In p. By replacing,
q̄ = π X̄ + γ in (19a), we get that x̄ is of the form (22). Next, by implementing this new form
of x̄ in the expression of (20b) and by noting that Λ satisfies (20a), Λ is a fixed point of F .
Conversely, we consider Λ to be a fixed point of F , X̄ = R1 (t, 0)X̄(0) + R2 (t)Λ ⊗ In p and
x̄ = P1 X̄. We define q̄(t) = −(BR−1 B 0 )−1 ( dtd X̄(t) − AX̄(t)). (X̄, q̄) satisfies (19a)-(19b). We
s,Λ
have Λsj = F (Λ)sj = P(xs,Λ
is defined in (24). But x̄ is of the form
∗ (T ) ∈ Wj ), where x∗
(25), hence xλ∗ is the unique strong solution of (20b). Therefore, x̄ satisfies (19a)-(20b), and by
Lemma 4, it satisfies (17). This proves the first point.
Next, to show the existence of a fixed point of F , it is sufficient to show that F is continuous,
in which case Brouwer’s fixed point theorem [37, Section V.9] ensures the existence of a fixed
point. Equation (24) is a stochastic differential equation depending on the parameter Λ. By [38,
Theorem 1], the joint distribution of X∗Λ and the Brownian motion W is weakly continuous in
Λ. Consider a sequence of stochastic matrices {Λn }n≥0 converging to the stochastic matrix Λ.
The distribution of X∗Λn (T ) converges weakly to the distribution of X∗λ (T ) Moreover, X∗λ is the
solution of a non-degenerate SDE. Hence, Wj , j = 1, . . . , l, is a continuity set of the distribution
of X∗λ . Therefore, lim F (Λn )sj = lim P(x∗s,Λn (T ) ∈ Wj ) = P(xs,Λ
∗ (T ) ∈ Wj ) = F (Λ)sj , and so
n
August 21, 2017
n
DRAFT
29
F is continuous. Finally, using arguments similar to those used in [14, Lemma 9], one can show
the third point.
R EFERENCES
[1] F. Koppelman and V. Sathi, “Incorporating variance and covariance heterogeneity in the generalized nested logit model:
an application to modeling long distance travel choice behavior,” Transportation Research, vol. 39, pp. 825–853, 2005.
[2] C. Bhat and J. Guo, “A mixed spatially correlated logit model: formulation and application to residential choice modeling,”
Transportation Research, vol. 38, pp. 147–168, 2004.
[3] R. Nakajima, “Measuring peer effects on youth smoking behaviour,” The Review of Economic Studies, vol. 74, no. 3, pp.
897–935, 2007.
[4] D. Vail and M. Veloso, “Multi-robot dynamic role assignment and coordination through shared potential fields,” Multi-robot
systems, pp. 87–98, 2003.
[5] A. Halász, M. A. Hsieh, S. Berman, and V. Kumar, “Dynamic redistribution of a swarm of robots among multiple sites,”
in 2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.
IEEE, 2007, pp. 2320–2325.
[6] M. A. Hsieh, Á. Halász, S. Berman, and V. Kumar, “Biologically inspired redistribution of a swarm of robots among
multiple sites,” Swarm Intelligence, vol. 2, no. 2-4, pp. 121–141, 2008.
[7] S. Merrill and B. Grofman, A Unified Theory of Voting: Directional and Proximity Spatial Models. Cambridge University
Press, 1999.
[8] G. B. Markus and P. E. Converse, “A dynamic simultaneous equation model of electoral choice,” American Political
Science Review, vol. 73, no. 04, pp. 1055–1070, 1979.
[9] D. McFadden, “Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior,” in Frontiers in Econometrics, P. Zarembka, Ed.
New York: New York: Academic Press, 1974, ch. 4, pp. 105–142.
[10] J. Rust, “Structural estimation of markov decision processes,” Handbook of econometrics, vol. 4, pp. 3081–3143, 1994.
[11] W. Brock and S. Durlauf, “Discrete choice with social interactions,” Review of Economic Studies, pp. 147–168, 2001.
[12] R. Salhab, R. P. Malhamé, and J. Le Ny, “Consensus and disagreement in collective homing problems: A mean field games
formulation,” in Proceedings of the 53rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Dec 2014, pp. 916–921.
[13] ——, “A dynamic game model of collective choice in multi-agent systems,” in Proceedings of the 54th IEEE Conference
on Decision and Control, Dec 2015, pp. 4444–4449.
[14] R. Salhab, R. P. Malhamé, and J. Le Ny, “A dynamic game model of collective choice in multi-agent systems,” IEEE
Transactions on Automatic Control, 2017, In Press, available at http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7970149/.
[15] M. Huang, P. E. Caines, and R. P. Malhamé, “Individual and mass behaviour in large population stochastic wireless power
control problems: centralized and Nash equilibrium solutions,” in Proceedings of the 42nd IEEE Conference on Decision
and Control, 2003, pp. 98–103.
[16] ——, “Large-population cost-coupled LQG problems with nonuniform agents: Individual-mass behavior and decentralized
epsilon-Nash equilibria,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 52, no. 9, pp. 1560–1571, 2007.
[17] M. Huang, R. P. Malhamé, and P. E. Caines, “Large population stochastic dynamic games: closed-loop McKean-Vlasov
systems and the Nash certainty equivalence principle,” Communications in Information & Systems, vol. 6, no. 3, pp.
221–252, 2006.
[18] J. M. Lasry and P. L. Lions, “Jeux à champ moyen. I–le cas stationnaire,” Comptes Rendus Mathématique, vol. 343, no. 9,
pp. 619–625, 2006.
August 21, 2017
DRAFT
30
[19] ——, “Jeux à champ moyen. II–horizon fini et contrôle optimal,” Comptes Rendus Mathématique, vol. 343, no. 10, pp.
679–684, 2006.
[20] ——, “Mean field games,” Japanese Journal of Mathematics, vol. 2, pp. 229–260, 2007.
[21] F. Fagnani and S. Zampieri, “Randomized consensus algorithms over large scale networks,” IEEE Journal on Selected
Areas in Communications, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 634–649, 2008.
[22] I. Karatzas and S. Shreve, Brownian motion and stochastic calculus. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012, vol. 113.
[23] R. Salhab, R. P. Malhamé, and J. Le Ny, “A dynamic game model of collective choice: Stochastic dynamics and closed
loop solutions,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1604.08136, 2016.
[24] M. Huang, P. E. Caines, and R. P. Malhamé, “Social optima in mean field LQG control: centralized and decentralized
strategies,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 57, no. 7, pp. 1736–1751, 2012.
[25] W. H. Fleming and H. M. Soner, Controlled Markov processes and viscosity solutions.
Springer Science & Business
Media, 2006, vol. 25.
[26] L. Evans, Partial Differential Equations, ser. Graduate studies in mathematics.
American Mathematical Society, 1998.
[27] J. Yong and X. Y. Zhou, Stochastic controls: Hamiltonian systems and HJB equations.
Springer Science & Business
Media, 1999, vol. 43.
[28] D. Gomes, E. Pimentel, and V. Voskanyan, Regularity Theory for Mean-Field Game Systems, ser. SpringerBriefs in
Mathematics.
Springer, 2016.
[29] T. Liggett, Interacting particle systems.
Springer Science & Business Media, 2012, vol. 276.
[30] L. Perko, Differential equations and dynamical systems.
Springer Science & Business Media, 2013, vol. 7.
[31] B. D. Anderson and J. B. Moore, Optimal control: linear quadratic methods.
Dover Publications, 2007.
[32] G. Freiling, “A survey of nonsymmetric Riccati equations,” Linear algebra and its applications, vol. 351, pp. 243–270,
2002.
[33] R. Carmona and F. Delarue, “Probabilistic analysis of mean-field games,” SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization,
vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 2705–2734, 2013.
[34] L. Pichler, A. Masud, and L. Bergman, “Numerical solution of the Fokker–Planck equation by finite difference and finite
element methods - A comparative study,” in Computational Methods in Stochastic Dynamics. Springer, 2013, pp. 69–85.
[35] R. Durrett, Probability: theory and examples.
Cambridge university press, 2010.
[36] S. Peng, “A general stochastic maximum principle for optimal control problems,” SIAM Journal on control and optimization,
vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 966–979, 1990.
[37] J. B. Conway, A Course in Functional Analysis, ser. Graduate Texts in Mathematics.
Springer-Verlag, 1985.
[38] A. V. Skorokhod, “Stochastic differential equations depending on a parameter,” Theory of Probability & Its Applications,
vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 659–666, 1981.
August 21, 2017
DRAFT
31
Rabih Salhab is currently pursuing the Ph.D. degree in Electrical Engineering in the Department of
Electrical Engineering, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal, Canada. He received the B.S. degree in Electrical
Engineering from Ecole Supérieure d’Ingénieurs de Beyrouth (E.S.I.B), Lebanon, in 2008. From 2008 to
2013 he was an Electrical Engineer with Dar al Handasah Shair and Partners, Lebanon. His current
research interests are in stochastic control, game theory and mean field games theory and its applications.
Roland Malhamé received the Bachelors, Masters and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering from the
American University of Beirut, the University of Houston, and the Georgia Institute of Technology in
1976, 1978 and 1983 respectively.
After single year stays at University of Quebec , and CAE Electronics Ltd (Montreal), he joined in
1985 École Polytechnique de Montréal, where he is Professor of Electrical Engineering. In 1994, 2004,
and 2012 he was on sabbatical leave respectively with LSS CNRS (France), École Centrale de Paris, and
University of Rome Tor Vergata. His interest in statistical mechanics inspired approaches to the analysis and control of large
scale systems has led him to contributions in the area of aggregate electric load modeling, and to the early developments of
the theory of mean field games. His current research interests are in collective decentralized decision making schemes, and
the development of mean field based control algorithms in the area of smart grids. From june 2005 to june 2011, he headed
GERAD, the Group for Research on Decision Analysis. He is an Associate Editor of International Transactions on Operations
Research.
Jerome Le Ny (S’05-M’09-SM’16) received the Engineering Degree from the École Polytechnique,
France, in 2001, the M.Sc. degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Michigan, Ann
Arbor, in 2003, and the Ph.D. degree in Aeronautics and Astronautics from the Massachusetts Institute
of Technology, Cambridge, in 2008. He is currently an Associate Professor with the Department of
Electrical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Canada. He is a member of GERAD, a multi-university
research center on decision analysis. From 2008 to 2012 he was a Postdoctoral Researcher with the
GRASP Laboratory at the University of Pennsylvania. His research interests include robust and stochastic control, mean-field
control, privacy and security in large-scale networked control systems, dynamic resource allocation and active perception, with
applications to autonomous multi-robot systems and intelligent infrastructures.
August 21, 2017
DRAFT
| 3cs.SY
|
1
Kernel Truncated Regression Representation for
Robust Subspace Clustering
arXiv:1705.05108v2 [cs.CV] 23 May 2017
Liangli Zhen, Dezhong Peng, Xin Yao
Abstract—Subspace clustering aims to group data points into
multiple clusters of which each corresponds to one subspace.
Most existing subspace clustering methods assume that the data
could be linearly represented with each other in the input
space. In practice, however, this assumption is hard to be
satisfied. To achieve nonlinear subspace clustering, we propose
a novel method which consists of the following three steps: 1)
projecting the data into a hidden space in which the data can
be linearly reconstructed from each other; 2) calculating the
globally linear reconstruction coefficients in the kernel space;
3) truncating the trivial coefficients to achieve robustness and
block-diagonality, and then achieving clustering by solving a
graph Laplacian problem. Our method has the advantages of
a closed-form solution and capacity of clustering data points
that lie in nonlinear subspaces. The first advantage makes our
method efficient in handling large-scale data sets, and the second
one enables the proposed method to address the nonlinear
subspace clustering challenge. Extensive experiments on five realworld datasets demonstrate the effectiveness and the efficiency
of the proposed method in comparison with ten state-of-the-art
approaches regarding four evaluation metrics.
Index Terms—Kernel truncated regression; nonlinear subspace
clustering; spectral clustering; kernel techniques.
I. I NTRODUCTION
Subspace clustering is one of the most popular techniques
for data analysis, which has attracted increasing interests from
numerous areas, such as computer vision, image analysis,
and signal processing [1]. With the assumption of highdimensional data lying in a union of low-dimensional subspaces, subspace clustering aims to seek a set of subspaces
to fit a given data set and perform clustering based on the
identified subspaces.
During past decades, many subspace clustering methods
have been proposed, which can be roughly classified into
four categories: 1) iterative approaches [2]; 2) statistical approaches [3, 4]; 3) algebraic approaches [5–7]; and 4) spectral
clustering-based approaches [8–20]. In recent years, spectral
clustering-based approaches have achieved the state-of-the-art
in subspace clustering, of which the key is finding a blockdiagonal affinity matrix, where the element of the matrix
denotes the similarity between two data points and the blockLiangli Zhen is with the Machine Intelligence Laboratory, College of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China, and the CERCIA,
School of Computer Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15
2TT, UK. (e-mail: [email protected]).
Dezhong Peng is with the Machine Intelligence Laboratory, College of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China.
([email protected]).
Xin Yao is with the CERCIA, School of Computer Science, University of
Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK. (e-mail: [email protected]).
diagonal structure means that only the similarity among intracluster data points is nonzero.
To obtain a block-diagonal affinity matrix, most recent spectral clustering-based approaches measure the similarity using
so-called self-expression, i.e. representing each data point as
a linear combination of the whole data set and then using
the representation coefficients to build the affinity matrix. The
major difference of those methods is the constraints enforced
on the representation coefficients. For example, sparse subspace clustering (SSC) [11] assumes that each data point
can be linearly represented by a few of other points. To
achieve this end, SSC adopts the ℓ1 -norm constraint. Low-rank
representation (LRR) [12] encourages the coefficient matrix
to be low rank, such that it can capture the global structures
of data. To obtain low rankness, LRR enforces the nuclearnorm constraint on the coefficients. Different from SSC and
LRR, truncated regression representation (TRR) [17, 19] takes
Frobenius norm instead of ℓ1 - and nuclear-norm, which has
shown promising performance in many real-world applications. Like most existing subspace clustering algorithms [11–
13, 21], the major disadvantage of TRR is that it may not
give a satisfactory clustering result when data points cannot be
linearly represented with each other. In fact, many real-world
data are sampled from multiple nonlinear subspaces, which
brings challenges towards TRR and limits its applications in
practice.
To group the data drawn from multiple nonlinear subspaces,
in this paper, we propose a novel nonlinear subspace clustering method, termed kernel truncated regression representation
(KTRR). Our basic idea is based on the following assumption,
i.e. there exists a projection space in which the data can be
linearly represented. To illustrate this simple but effective idea,
we give a toy example in Fig. 1. The proposed method consists
of the following steps: 1) projecting the input into another
space via an implicit nonlinear transformation; 2) calculating
the global self-expression of the whole data set in the projection space in which the data can be linearly reconstructed;
3) eliminating the effect of errors such as Gaussian noise
by zeroing trivial coefficients; 4) constructing a Laplacian
graph using the obtained coefficients; 5) solving a generalized
Eigen-decomposition problem and obtain clustering with kmeans. The contributions and novelty of this work could be
summarized as follows:
• We propose a novel method which can cluster the data
points drawn from multiple nonlinear subspaces. To the
best of our knowledge, this is the first nonlinear extension
of TRR and one of the first several nonlinear clustering
approaches.
2
II. R ELATED W ORK
Fig. 1. The basic idea of our method. By projecting the data into another
space with an implicit nonlinear transformation, our method could solve the
problem of nonlinear subspace clustering. The left and right plots correspond
to the distribution of data in the input and hidden space, respectively.
We develop a closed-form solution to our method. This
makes our method very efficient, and useful for largescale data sets.
• Different from most existing subspace clustering methods
like SSC and LRR, KTRR achieves robustness by eliminating the impact of noises in the projection space instead
of input space. In other words, KTRR does not require the
prior on the structure of errors, which is more competitive
to handle corrupted subspaces. Extensive experimental
results show that our method significantly outperforms
ten other state-of-the-art subspace clustering algorithms
regarding accuracy, robustness, and computational cost.
The rest of this paper is organized as follows. Section II
discusses some related work. Section III presents the kernel
truncated regression and the new robust subspace clustering
method. Section IV provides experimental results to illustrate
the effectiveness and the efficiency of the proposed algorithm.
Section V concludes the paper.
Notations: In this paper, unless specified otherwise, lowercase bold letters represent column vectors, upper-case bold
letters represent matrices, and the entries of matrices are
denoted with subscripts. For instance, v is a column vector, vi
is its ith entry. M is a matrix, Mij is the entry in the ith row,
jth column, and mj denotes the jth column of M. Moreover,
MT represents the transpose of M, M−1 denotes the inverse
matrix of M, and I stands for the identity matrix. Table I
summarizes some notations used throughout the paper.
•
TABLE I
S OME NOTATIONS USED IN THIS PAPER .
During past decades, some spectral clustering-based methods have been proposed to achieve subspace clustering in
many applications such as image clustering [21], motion
segmentation [22], and gene expression analysis [23]. The
key of these methods is to obtain a block-diagonal similarity
matrix of which nonzero elements are only located on the
connections of the points from the same subspace. There
are two common strategies to compute the similarity matrix,
i.e., pairwise distance-based strategy and linear representationbased strategy [16]. Pairwise distance-based strategy computes
the similarity between two points according to their pairwise relationship, e.g., the original spectral clustering method
adopts the Euclidean distance with Heat Kernel to calculate
the similarity, i.e.,
s(xi , xj ) = e−
kxi −xj k2
2σ2
(1)
where s(xi , xj ) denotes the similarity between the data point
xi and data point xj , and the parameter σ controls the width
of the neighborhoods.
Alternatively, linear representation-based approaches assume that each data point could be represented as a linear
combination of some points from the intra-subspace. Based
on this assumption, the linear representation coefficient can
be used as a measurement of similarity and has achieved
state of the art in subspace clustering [11–13, 15, 19, 24–
26] since it encodes the global structure of the whole data set
into similarity.
For given a data matrix X = [x1 , x2 , . . . xn ] ∈ Rm×n , these
methods linearly represent X and obtain the coefficient matrix
C ∈ Rn×n in a self-expression manner by solving
min ℜ(C) s.t. X = XC, diag(C) = 0,
(2)
where diag(C) = 0 avoids the trivial solution which uses
the data point to represent itself by enforcing the diagonal
elements of C to be zeros. ℜ(C) denotes the adopted prior
structured regularization on C and the major difference among
most existing subspace clustering methods is the choice of
ℜ(C). For example, SSC [11] enforces the sparsity on C
by adopting ℓ1 -norm via ℜ(C) = kCk1 , LRR [12] obtains
low rankness by using nuclear norm with ℜ(C) = kCk∗ . To
further achieving robustness, (2) is extended as follows:
min ℜ(C) + ℘(E) s.t. X = XC + E, diag(C) = 0, (3)
Notation
m
n
L
λ
x i ∈ Rm
X ∈ Rm×n
Xi ∈ Rm×n
K ∈ Rn×n
ci ∈ Rn
C ∈ Rn×n
W ∈ Rn×n
L ∈ Rn×n
φ: Rm → H
κ(xi , xj )
Definition
the dimension of input data points
the number of input data points
the number of underlying subspaces
the balance parameter
the ith data point
the data matrix
the dictionary matrix for the data point xi
the kernel matrix of the input data points
the representation vector for the mapped data point φ(xi )
the linear representation coefficients matrix
the similarity matrix among all data points
the normalized Laplacian matrix
the mapping from the input space to the kernel space
the kernel function
where E stands for the errors induced by the noise and
corruption, ℘(E) measures the impact of the errors. Generally,
the ℘(·) = kEkF and ℘(·) = kEk1 are used to describe the
Gaussian noise and Laplacian noise, respectively. k·kF denotes
the Frobenius norm
Due to the assumption on linear reconstruction, those
methods failed to achieve nonlinear subspaces clustering. To
address this challenging issue, some recent works have been
proposed [15, 24], however, the methods have the following two disadvantages: 1) the methods are computationally
inefficient since they involve solving ℓ1 - or nuclear-norm
minimization problem; 2) Like SSC and LRR, the methods
3
need the prior on the errors existed in the data sets to get the
correct mathematical formulation. If the prior is inconsistent
with the real situation, the methods could achieve inferior
performance. To solve these issues, we propose a nonlinear
subspace clustering method which is complementary to existing approaches. Noticed that, Peng at al. recently proposed to
achieve nonlinearity with deep structures [27, 28], which are
first works to leverage deep learning and subspace clustering.
However, this has been beyond of the scope of this paper.
III. T HE PROPOSED
SUBSPACE CLUSTERING METHOD
This section will give the details of our proposed method,
which consists of three steps: 1) calculating the kernel truncated regression representation over the whole data set. 2)
eliminating the effectiveness of possible errors such as noises
from the representation and then building a graph Laplacian.
3) obtaining clustering by performing the k-means algorithm
on leading eigenvectors of the graph Laplacian. Moreover,
we also give the computational complexity of the proposed
method.
A. Kernel Truncated Regression Representation
For a given data set {xi }ni=1 , where xi ∈ Rm , we define a
matrix X = [x1 , x2 , . . . xn ]. Let φ: Rm → H be a nonlinear
mapping which transforms the input into a kernel space H, and
φ(Xi ) = [φ(x1 ), . . . , φ(xi−1 ), 0, φ(xi+1 ), . . . , φ(xn )]. After
mapping X into a kernel space, the corresponding {φ(xi )}ni=1
is generally believed lying in linear subspaces [15, 24]. Based
on this basic idea, we propose to formulate the objective
function of our KTRR as follows:
λ
1
(4)
min kφ(xi ) − φ(Xi )ci k22 + kci k22 ,
ci
2
2
where the first term is the reconstruction error in the kernel
space, the second term serves as an ℓ2 -norm regularization,
and λ is a positive real number, which controls the strength
of the ℓ2 -norm regularization term.
For each transformed data representation φ(xi ), solving the
optimization problem (4), it gives that
−1
ci = φ(Xi )T φ(Xi ) + λI
φ(Xi )T φ(xi ), (i = 1, · · · , n).
(5)
Note that it requires O(n4 + mn2 ) for solving the above
problems of n data points with dimensionality of m.
To solve (4) more efficiently, we rewrite it as
1
λ
min kφ(xi ) − φ(X)ci k22 + kci k22 ,
ci 2
2
eTi ci = 0,
(6)
where ei is a column vector with all zero elements except
the i-th element is 1, and the constraint eTi ci = 0 eliminates
the trivial solution of writing a transformed point as a linear
combination of itself.
Using Lagrangian method, we obtain that
L(ci ) =
s.t.
λ
1
kφ(xi ) − φ(X)ci k22 + kci k22 + θeTi ci ,
2
2
(7)
where θ is the Lagrangian multiplier. Clearly,
∂L(ci )
= (φ(X)T φ(X) + λI)ci − φ(X)T φ(xi ) + θei . (8)
∂ci
Let
∂L(ci )
∂ci
= 0, we get
ci = (φ(X)T φ(X) + λI)−1 (φ(X)T φ(xi ) − θei ).
(9)
Multiplying ei on both sides of (9), and since eTi ci = 0, it
holds that
θ=
eTi (φ(X)T φ(X) + λI)−1 φ(X)T φ(xi )
.
eTi (φ(X)T φ(X) + λI)−1 ei
(10)
Substituting (10) into (9), the optimal solution is given as
ci = qi − P
eTi qi ei
,
eTi Pei
(11)
where qi = P(φ(X)T φ(xi )), and P = (φ(X)T φ(X)+λI)−1 .
One can find that the solution to (11) does not require
φ(xi ) to be explicitly computed, i.e. we will only need their
dot products. Therefore, we can employ kernel functions for
computing these dot products without explicitly performing
the mapping φ. For some choices of a kernel κ(xi , xj ):
Rm × Rm → R, [29] has shown that κ can get the dot product
in the kernel space H induced by the mapping φ.
We can combine all the dot products as a matrix K ∈
RN ×N whose elements are calculated as
Kij = φ(xi )T φ(xj ) = [φ(X)T φ(X)]ij = κ(xi , xj ),
(12)
where φ(X) = [φ(x1 ), φ(x2 ), . . . φ(xn )]. The matrix K is the
kernel matrix, which is a symmetric and positive semidefinite
matrix. Accordingly, (11) can be rewritten as
c∗i = vi − U
eTi vi ei
,
eTi Uei
(13)
where vi = Uki , and U = (K + λI)−1 .
It is notable that only one pseudo-inverse operation is
needed for solving the representation problems of all data
points. The computational complexity of calculating the optimal solutions in (13) has decreased to O(n3 + mn2 ) for n
data points with m dimensions.
It has been proved that, under certain condition, the coefficients over intra-subspace data points are larger than those
over inter-subspace data points [17]. After representing the
data set by the kernel matrix via (13), we handle the errors by
performing a hard thresholding operator Tη (·) over ci , where
Tη (·) keeps η largest entries in ci and sets other entries as
zeros like TRR, i.e.,
Tη (ci ) = [Tη (C1i ), Tη (C2i ), . . . , Tη (Cni )]T
and
Tη (Cji ) =
(
Cji , if Cji ∈ Ωi ;
0,
otherwise,
(14)
(15)
where Ωi consists of η largest elements of ci . Typically, the
optimal η equals to the dimensionality of corresponding kernel
4
subspace. In this manner, it avoids to model the impact of the
noises into the optimization problem explicitly and does not
need the prior knowledge about the errors.
B. KTRR for Robust Subspace Clustering
In this section, we present the method to achieve subspace
clustering by incorporating the KTRR into spectral clustering
framework [8].
For a given data set X which consists of n data points in
Rm , we assume that these points should be lying in a union
of L low-dimensional nonlinear subspaces. We propose to
project the data points into another space, in which the mapped
points can be linearly represented by these mapped points from
the intra-subspace. From (11), we find that the representation
coefficients does not require the projection function in explicit
form, but are only needed in dot products. We can induce a
kernel function to calculate these dot products, and obtain the
representation coefficients via (13).
Moreover, the existence of the errors in the input data
set leads to some error connections among the data points
from different subspaces. We propose to remove these errors
through a hard thresholding on each column vector of the
coefficient matrix C via (14).
As we claimed before, these representation coefficients can
be seen as the similarities among the input data points. The
similarity between two intra-subspace data points is large, and
that between two inter-subspace data points is zero or very
close to zero. Such that we can build a similarity matrix W
based on the obtained coefficient matrix C as
W = |CT | + |C|.
(16)
This is a symmetric similarity matrix which is suitable for
integrating into the spectral clustering framework.
Then, we compute the normalized Laplacian matrix [8]
1
1
L = I − D− 2 WD− 2 ,
Algorithm 1 Learning kernel truncated regression representation for robust subspace clustering
Input: A given data set X ∈ Rm×n , the tradeoff parameter
λ, thresholding parameter η, and the number of subspaces
L.
Output: The clustering labels of the input data points.
1: Calculate the kernel matrix K and the matrix U in (13)
and store them.
2: For each point xi ∈ Rm , calculate its linear representation
coefficients in the kernel space ci ∈ Rn via (13).
3: Remove the trivial coefficients from ci by performing hard
thresholding operator Tη (ci ), i.e., keeping η largest entries
in ci and zeroing all other elements.
4: Construct a symmetric similarity matrix via (16).
5: Calculate the normalised Laplacian matrix L via (17).
6: Compute the eigenvector matrix Y ∈ Rn×L that consists
of the first L normalized eigenvectors of L corresponding
to its L smallest nonzero eigenvalues.
7: Perform k-means clustering algorithm over the rows of Y
to get the clustering membership.
considerably less than that of KSSC (O(mn2 + tn3 ))[30],
KLRR(O(t(rX + r)n2 )[24], where t denotes the total number
of iterations for the corresponding algorithm, rX is the rank
of X, and r is the rank for partial SVD at each iteration of
KLRR.
IV. E XPERIMENTAL R ESULTS AND A NALYSIS
In this section, we experimentally evaluate the performance
of the proposed method. We consider the results in terms of
three aspects: 1) accuracy, 2) robustness, and 3) computational
cost. Robustness is evaluated by conducting experiments using
samples with two different types of corruptions, i.e., Gaussian
noises and random pixel corruption.
(17)
Pn
where D is a diagonal matrix with Dii =
j=1 Wij . The
matrix L is positive semi-definite and has an eigenvalue equals
1
0 with eigenvector D 2 1 [9], where 1 = [1, 1, . . . , 1]T ∈ Rn .
Next, we calculate the first L eigenvectors y1 , y2 , . . . , yL of
L, which corresponding to its first L smallest nonzero eigenvalues, and construct a matrix Y = [y1 , y2 , . . . , yL ] ∈ Rn×L .
Finally, we apply the k-means clustering method on the
matrix Y, by treating each row vector as a point, to get
the clustering membership. The proposed subspace clustering
algorithm is summarized in Algorithm 1.
C. Computational Complexity Analysis
Given a data matrix X ∈ Rm×n , the KTRR takes O(mn2 )
to compute the kernel matrix K. Then it takes O(n3 ) to
obtain the matrix U, and O(mn2 ) to calculate all the solutions
in (13) with the matrices U and K. Finally, it requires
O(ηlogη) to find η largest coefficients in each column of the
representation matrix C. Putting these steps together, we get
the computational complexity of KTRR as O(mn2 +n3 ). This
computational complexity is the same as that of TRR, and is
A. Databases
Five popular image databases are used in our experiments, including Extended Yale Database B (ExYaleB) [31],
Columbia Object Image Library (COIL 20) [32], Columbia
Object Image Library (COIL 100) [33], USPS [34], and
MNIST [35]. We give the details of these databases as follows:
• The ExYaleB database contains 2414 frontal face images
of 38 subjects and around 64 near frontal images under
different illuminations per individual, where each image
is manually cropped and normalized to the size of 32×32
pixels [36].
• The COIL 20 and COIL 100 databases contain 20 and
100 objects respectively. The images of each object were
taken 5 degrees apart as the object is rotated on a turntable
and each object has 72 images. The size of each image
is 32 × 32 pixels, with 256 grey levels per pixel [36].
1
• The USPS handwritten digit database
includes ten
classes (0−9 digit characters) and 11000 samples in total.
1 The USPS database and MNIST database used in this paper are download
from http://www.cad.zju.edu.cn/home/dengcai/Data/MLData.html.
5
•
We use a popular subset contains 9298 handwritten digit
images for the experiments, and all of these images are
normalized to the size of 16×16 pixels. In the experiment,
we select 200 samples of each subject from the database
randomly by following the strategy in [10].
The MNIST handwritten digit database includes ten
classes (0 − 9 digit characters) and 60000 samples in
total. We use first 10000 handwritten digit images of
the training subset to conduct the experiments, and all
of these images are normalized to the size of 28 × 28
pixels. In the experiment, we also select 200 samples of
each subject from the database randomly to evaluate the
performance of different algorithms.
The details of these real-world databases are summarized in
Table II
TABLE II
D ETAILS OF SEVEN DATA SETS FOR THE EXPERIMENTS . F OR SIMPLICITY,
c DENOTES THE TOTAL NUMBER OF CLUSTERS , AND ni STANDS FOR THE
NUMBER OF SAMPLES IN EACH CLUSTER .
Dataset
ExYaleB
COIL 20
COIL 100
USPS
MNIST
c
38
20
100
10
10
ni
58
72
72
1000
1000
Original size
192 × 168
128 × 128
128 × 128
16 × 16
28 × 28
Normalised size
32 × 32
32 × 32
32 × 32
16 × 16
28 × 28
C. Visualisation of Representation and Similarity Matrices
Before evaluating the clustering performance of the proposed method, we illustrate the visualization results of the
KTRR coefficients matrix and the obtained similarity matrix.
We get the result by using the first 128 facial images in the
ExYaleB database, first 64 samples of which belong to the first
subject, and the other 64 samples belong to the second subject.
We set the parameters as λ = 5, η = 4. The representation
matrix C in (13) and the constructed similarity matrix W are
shown in Fig. 2(a) and Fig. 2(b) respectively.
From Fig. 2(a), we can see that the upper-left part and the
bottom-right part are illuminated from the upper-right part
and the bottom-left part, but there still exist some non-zero
elements in the upper-right part and the bottom-left part. That
is to say, the connections among the same subject are much
stronger than that among different subjects, while there are
many trivial connections among the samples from different
subjects since the samples from various subjects are facial
images, which have some common characteristics.
As we know, an ideal similarity matrix for the spectral
clustering algorithm is a block diagonal matrix, i.e., the
connections should only exist among the data points from the
same cluster [12, 15, 17, 24, 26], such that a hard thresholding
operation has been executed. From the result of similarity
matrix W in Fig. 2(b), we find that:
•
B. Baselines and Evaluation Metrics
We compare KTRR2 with 10 state-of-art subspace clustering algorithms including truncated regression representation
(TRR) [17], kernel low-rank representation (KLRR) [24],
kernel sparse subspace clustering (KSSC) [30], Latent lowrank representation (LatLRR) [25], low-rank representation
(LRR1) with ℓ1 -norm [12], low-rank representation (LRR2)
with ℓ21 -norm [12], sparse subspace clustering (SSC) [11],
sparse manifold clustering and embedding (SMCE) [26], local
subspace analysis (LSA) [37], and standard spectral clustering
(SC) [8].
For a fair comparison, we use the same spectral clustering
framework [8] with different similarity matrices obtained by
the tested algorithms. Like [24], for all kernel-based algorithms, we adopt the commonly used Gaussian kernel on all
datasets and use the default bandwidth parameter which is set
to the mean of the distances between all the samples.
Four popular metrics are adopted to evaluate the subspace
clustering quality, i.e., accuracy (AC) [10, 38], normalized
mutual information (NMI) [10, 38], the adjusted rand index
(ARI) [39], and Fscore [40]. The values of above four metrics
are higher if the method works better. The values of these four
metrics are equal to 1 indicates the predict results is perfectly
matching with the ground truth, whereas 0 indicates totally
mismatch.
2 The source code of our proposed method are available
https://www.dropbox.com/s/8vj1k1b184w2ksv/KTRR.zip?dl=0.
at
•
•
Our method reveals the latent structure of data though
these images belong to the two subjects. There exist only
a few bright spots in the upper-right part and the bottomleft part of the obtained similarity matrix, i.e., the trivial
connections among the samples from different subjects
have been mostly removed by using the thresholding
processing;
Almost all of the bright spots lie in the diagonal blocks
of the similarity matrix, i.e., the strong connections exist
among the samples from the same subject;
The obtained similarity matrix is a symmetric matrix
which can be directly used for subspace clustering under
the framework of spectral clustering [8].
D. Clustering on Clean Images
In this experiment, we compare the KTRR method
with other ten state-of-the-art approaches on four different benchmark databases, i.e., Extended Yale Database B
(ExYaleB) [31], Columbia Object Image Library (COIL
20) [32], USPS [34], MNIST [35]. For each dataset, we
perform each algorithm 10 runs, in each run the k-means clustering step are repeated 500 times, and report the mean and the
standard deviation of the used metrics. The clustering quality
on above four databases are shown in Table III - Table VI. The
better means for each database are highlighted in boldface. To
have statistically sound conclusions, the Wilcoxon’s rank sum
test [41] at a 0.05 significance level is adopted to test the
significance of the differences between the results obtained
by the proposed method and all other algorithms. From the
results, we can obtain the following conclusions.
(1) Evaluation on the ExYaleB facial database:
6
(a)
(b)
Fig. 2. The visualization of the representation matrix and the similarity matrix on 128 facial images which from first 2 subjects in ExYaleB database. (a)
The representation matrix in (13). (b) The similarity matrix obtained by our algorithm. The experiment was carried out on the first two subjects of ExYaleB.
The top rows and the right columns illustrate some images of these two subjects. The dotted lines split each matrix into four parts. The upper-left part: the
similarity relationship among the 64 images of the first subject. The bottom-right part: the similarity relationship among the 64 images of the second subject.
The upper-right part and the bottom-left part: the similarity relationship among the images from different subjects. From the connections, it is easy to find
that the upper-left part and the bottom-right part are illuminated from the upper-right part and the bottom-left part, which means that our method reflects the
correct relationship among the samples from different subjects.
TABLE III
C LUSTERING PERFORMANCE (%) COMPARISONS IN DIFFERENT METHODS ON THE E X YALE B DATABASE . T HE BEST MEAN RESULTS IN DIFFERENT
METRICS ARE IN BOLD . T HE “†” INDICATES THAT THE VALUE OF THE METHOD IS SIGNIFICANTLY DIFFERENT FROM ALL OTHER METHODS AT A 0.05
LEVEL BY THE W ILCOXON ’ S RANK SUM TEST.
Metric
KTRR
TRR
KLRR
KSSC
LatLRR
LRR1
LRR2
SSC
SMCE
LSA
SC
AC
NMI
ARI
Fscore
84.82+5.75†
89.52+2.43†
77.09+5.84†
77.72+5.66†
67.04+2.93
72.20+2.61
41.07+6.91
43.01+6.52
52.30+4.31
61.98+2.45
36.06+3.49
37.87+3.37
58.41+3.19
64.41+1.10
32.40+5.82
34.59+5.38
51.40+3.36
54.41+1.76
27.10+2.26
29.33+2.07
50.32+2.68
53.31+1.42
26.42+2.17
28.66+2.00
49.80+4.72
53.26+2.22
25.63+2.70
27.93+2.52
52.87+5.46
58.02+3.44
24.20+4.74
26.83+4.34
48.91+3.71
60.22+1.28
30.46+3.06
32.54+2.84
33.97+3.95
47.38+1.87
20.98+1.45
23.20+1.36
19.69+1.70
32.96+1.54
10.16+1.01
12.56+0.98
TABLE IV
C LUSTERING PERFORMANCE (%) COMPARISONS IN DIFFERENT METHODS ON THE COIL 20 DATABASE . T HE BEST MEAN RESULTS IN DIFFERENT
METRICS ARE IN BOLD . T HE “†” INDICATES THAT THE VALUE OF THE METHOD IS SIGNIFICANTLY DIFFERENT FROM ALL OTHER METHODS AT A 0.05
LEVEL BY THE W ILCOXON ’ S RANK SUM TEST.
Metric
KTRR
TRR
KLRR
KSSC
LatLRR
LRR1
LRR2
SSC
SMCE
LSA
SC
AC
NMI
ARI
Fscore
90.25+6.13†
94.71+2.75†
88.04+5.49†
88.65+5.19†
84.12+3.35
91.79+0.94
80.72+3.05
81.76+2.80
68.66+5.51
77.93+3.24
61.96+6.98
63.92+6.55
79.39+8.15
89.50+2.73
76.54+7.13
77.81+6.65
67.97+3.47
76.78+1.32
60.03+2.42
62.03+2.30
67.94+7.97
76.45+2.20
60.03+4.94
62.09+4.66
66.59+3.35
75.33+2.50
58.45+4.21
60.57+3.98
69.39+5.93
80.61+2.44
62.14+5.18
64.17+4.80
76.51+15.98
90.51+5.69
75.20+15.45
76.61+14.41
72.86+6.67
81.49+3.69
68.13+5.92
69.74+5.57
69.17+3.81
79.43+2.18
63.77+3.88
65.60+3.68
TABLE V
C LUSTERING PERFORMANCE (%) COMPARISONS IN DIFFERENT METHODS ON THE USPS HANDWRITING DATABASE . T HE BEST MEAN RESULTS IN
DIFFERENT METRICS ARE IN BOLD . T HE “†” INDICATES THAT THE VALUE OF THE METHOD IS SIGNIFICANTLY DIFFERENT FROM ALL OTHER METHODS
AT A 0.05 LEVEL BY THE W ILCOXON ’ S RANK SUM TEST.
Metric
KTRR
TRR
KLRR
KSSC
LatLRR
LRR1
LRR2
SSC
SMCE
LSA
SC
AC
NMI
ARI
Fscore
81.36+14.93†
78.04+6.63†
71.73+12.67†
74.69+11.13†
60.24+16.98
59.55+7.61
46.06+13.33
51.98+11.29
70.72+2.63
66.23+3.35
57.21+3.76
61.64+3.41
75.17+2.89
73.97+2.41
65.11+3.67
68.76+3.28
70.97+4.10
66.55+4.37
57.20+4.51
61.59+4.11
70.16+4.29
66.69+4.63
57.18+4.79
61.58+4.34
70.91+3.96
66.87+4.35
57.50+4.48
61.85+4.08
26.86+13.39
20.93+13.44
9.95+13.56
24.07+7.62
73.77+7.85
71.29+9.69
62.08+13.10
66.10+11.63
68.51+8.95
64.80+7.93
55.58+9.00
60.30+7.99
70.79+8.58
62.72+4.55
53.55+5.24
58.25+4.67
TABLE VI
C LUSTERING PERFORMANCE (%) COMPARISONS IN DIFFERENT METHODS ON THE MNIST HANDWRITING DATABASE . T HE BEST MEAN RESULTS IN
DIFFERENT METRICS ARE IN BOLD . T HE “†” INDICATES THAT THE VALUE OF THE METHOD IS SIGNIFICANTLY DIFFERENT FROM ALL OTHER METHODS
AT A 0.05 LEVEL BY THE W ILCOXON ’ S RANK SUM TEST.
Metric
KTRR
TRR
KLRR
KSSC
LatLRR
LRR1
LRR2
SSC
SMCE
LSA
SC
AC
NMI
ARI
Fscore
63.97+8.11†
66.81+4.43†
52.63+5.04†
57.92+4.16†
32.19+16.22
24.73+15.97
12.35+13.93
24.31+8.95
61.31+6.14
60.07+5.86
47.46+5.77
52.99+4.92
57.13+15.57
59.43+13.06
45.02+16.11
50.99+14.05
14.48+8.37
4.04+7.96
1.26+4.47
18.13+2.74
18.08+10.57
6.76+11.18
2.80+6.50
18.42+4.13
18.52+12.34
7.53+14.97
3.27+8.64
18.43+5.15
22.02+20.53
14.58+24.25
6.16+16.06
21.67+9.34
61.66+5.59
59.08+3.99
46.81+5.80
52.39+5.05
63.03+7.46
61.94+5.78
49.50+8.19
54.78+7.28
55.11+5.45
48.80+5.30
36.95+5.62
43.38+5.01
7
All linear and non-linear representation methods, i.e.,
KTRR, TRR [17], KLRR [24], KSSC [15], LRR [12],
SSC [11], outperform the standard spectral clustering
method [8].
• All the linear representation methods, i.e., TRR [17],
LRR [12], and SSC [11], are inferior to their kernel-based
extensions, i.e., KTRR, KLRR [24], and KSSC [15].
It means that the non-linear representation methods are
more suitable to model the ExYaleB facial images.
• The KTRR algorithm achieves the best results in the
tests and gains a significant improvement over TRR. The
means of Accuracy, N M I, ARI, and F score of KTRR
are about 17%, 17%, 26% and 24% higher than that of
the TRR, 32%, 28%, 41%, and 40% higher than that of
the KLRR.
(2) Evaluation on the COIL 20 database:
• All the linear representation methods, i.e., TRR [17],
LRR [12], and SSC [11], are still inferior to their
kernel-based extensions, i.e., KTRR, KLRR [24], and
KSSC [15]. Their non-linear versions obtain the
Accuracy improvements of 6.13%, 0.68%, and 10%,
respectively.
• The KTRR algorithm gets the Accuracy of 90.25%,
which is better than all other tested methods. Specifically,
the Accuracy of KTRR is about 6.13% higher than that
of the second best method TRR, and 21.86% higher than
that of the third best method KLRR.
• The KLRR, LatLRR and two types of LRR methods are
all inferior to the standard spectral method.
(3) Evaluation on the USPS handwriting database:
• All the linear representation methods, i.e., TRR [17],
LRR [12], and SSC [11], are inferior to their kernel-based
extensions, i.e., KTRR, KLRR [24], and KSSC [15].
The performance improvement is considerable, e.g., the
Accuracy of KSSC is about 44% higher than that of
SSC.
• SSC is inferior to LRR, while its kernel-based extension
KLRR outperforms the kernel-based extension of LRR.
The implicit transformation on the USPS images makes
the mapped data points to be much better represented
with each other in a sparse representation form.
• The KTRR algorithm achieves the best results in the tests.
The Accuracy of KTRR is about 21% higher than that
of the TRR, 10% higher than that of the KLRR, and 6%
higher than that of the KSSC. The performance indices
of KTRR on N M I, ARI, and F score are also greater
than other tested methods.
(4) Evaluation on the MNIST handwriting database:
• All the linear representation methods, i.e., TRR [17],
LRR [12], and SSC [11], are inferior to their kernel-based
extensions, i.e., KTRR, KLRR [24], and KSSC [15].
Especially, LRR results in poor performance on this
database, while its kernel-based version, KLRR, obtains much better clustering quality regarding Accuracy,
N M I, ARI, and F score.
• The KTRR, KLRR, SMCE and LSA algorithms achieve
the best clustering results on the MNIST handwriting
•
•
images compared with other methods. However, the performances of all the test methods are not well.
The proposed method KTRR achieves the best clustering
result and obtains a significant improvement of 31.78%
at Accuracy on TRR. The indexes N M I, ARI, and
F score of KTRR are also higher than all other tested
methods.
E. Clustering on Corrupted Images
To evaluate the robustness of the proposed method, we
conduct the experiments on the first 10 subjects of COIL20
database and ExYaleB database respectively. All used images
are corrupted by additive white Gaussian noises or random
pixel corruptions. Some corrupted image samples under different levels of noises are as shown in Fig. 3. Actually, for
the additional Gaussian noises, we add the noises with SN R
equals 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 dB; For the random pixel corruptions,
we adopt the pepper & salt noises with the ratios of affected
pixels be 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%.
The clustering quality of the compared methods on the two
databases with additional Gaussian noises is shown in Fig. 4,
from which we can get the following observations:
• Most of these spectral-based methods are relatively robust
to the additional Gaussian noises. While the performance
of LRR1, LRR2, and LatLRR are sharply deteriorated
on these two databases. The main reason may be that the
additional Gaussian noises have destroyed the underlie
the low-rank structure of the representation matrix.
• The accuracy of all tested methods on COIL20 database
are higher than that on ExYaleB database. It is consistent
with the result of that on clean images.
• The proposed KTRR is considerably more robust than
other methods for additional Gaussian noises. Specifically, KTRR obtains the Accuracy around 80% under
SN R = 10dB, which are much higher than all other
tested algorithms, especially SC, LSA, LRR1, and LRR2.
The clustering quality of the compared methods on the
images with randomly corruptions is shown in Fig. 5, from
which we obtain that:
• All the investigated methods perform not as well as the
case with white Gaussian noise. The result is consistent with a widely-accepted conclusion that non-additive
corruptions are more challenging than additive ones in
pattern recognition;
• All of the test algorithms perform much better on COIL20
database than on ExYaleB database. The Accuracy of
all algorithms are lower than 40% on ExYaleB under
20% and 25% of corrupted pixels. From the Fig. 3, we
find that most pixel values of the images from COIL20
database are close to 0 or 255. This leads to some of the
corruptions to be useless and weakens the impact to the
final clustering results.
• The KTRR algorithm is robust to the random pixel
corruptions. It achieves the best results under the ratio
of affected pixels equals 5% to 15% on the test two
databases. It obtains the Accuracy around 60% under the
ratio of affected pixels equals 25% on COIL20 database,
8
(a)
(b)
Fig. 3. (a) The corrupted samples with additional Gaussian noises under SN R equals 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 dB from left to right. (b) The corrupted samples
with pepper and salt noises under the ratio of affected pixels equals 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25% from left to right.
KTRR
TRR
KLRR
KSSC
LatLRR
LRR1
LRR2
SSC
SMCE
LSA
SC
Accuracy (%)
80
60
40
20
0
10
20
30
40
100
Accuracy (%)
100
80
60
40
20
10
50
KTRR
TRR
KLRR
KSSC
LatLRR
LRR1
LRR2
SSC
SMCE
LSA
SC
The levels of noises SNR
20
30
40
50
The levels of noises SNR
(a)
(b)
Fig. 4. The clustering results on images with different levels of additional Gaussian noises. (a) The clustering accuracy on the ExYaleB database. (b) The
clustering accuracy on the COIL 20 database.
KTRR
TRR
KLRR
KSSC
LatLRR
LRR1
LRR2
SSC
SMCE
LSA
SC
60
40
20
0
5%
10%
15%
20%
100
KTRR
TRR
KLRR
KSSC
LatLRR
LRR1
LRR2
SSC
SMCE
LSA
SC
80
Accuracy (%)
Accuracy (%)
80
60
40
20
0
5%
25%
10%
15%
20%
25%
The ratios of corrupted pixels
The ratios of corrupted pixels
(a)
(b)
Fig. 5. The clustering results on images with different ratios of pepper & salt corruptions. (a) The clustering accuracy on the ExYaleB database. (b) The
clustering accuracy on the COIL 20 database.
which is a very challenging situation that we can see in
Fig. 3. However, the Accuracy of KTRR drops severely
with the increase of the ratios of corrupted pixels, and
lower than that of SSC under 20% and 25% of corrupted
pixels. The KTRR should be improved to handle the
images with salt & pepper corruptions.
for clustering (t2 ) are recorded to evaluate the efficiency of
compared methods.
Table VII shows the time cost of different methods with the
parameters which achieve their best results. We can see that:
•
F. Computational Time
To investigate the efficiency of KTRR, we compare its
computational time with that of other 10 approaches on the
clean images of four databases. Our hardware configuration
comprises of a 2.4-GHz CPU and a 16 GB RAM. The time
cost for building similarity graph (t1 ) and the whole time cost
•
The standard SC [8] is the fastest since its similarity graph
is computing via the pairwise kernel distances among the
input samples, while the KSSC [15] is the most timeconsuming method.
The time cost of the proposed method is very close to
that of its linear version TRR [17]. Specifically, the TRR
method is faster than KTRR on ExYaleB and USPS
databases, while it is slower than KTRR on MNIST
database. They have similar time cost on COIL database.
9
TABLE VII
C OMPUTATIONAL TIME ( SECONDS ) COMPARISONS OF DIFFERENT METHODS ON THE E X YALE B, COIL 20, USPS, AND MNIST DATABASES . T HE t1 AND
t2 DENOTE THE TIME COST ON THE SIMILARITY GRAPH CONSTRUCTION PROCESS AND THE TIME COST ON THE WHOLE CLUSTERING PROCESS OF EACH
METHOD RESPECTIVELY. T HE BEST MEAN RESULTS IN DIFFERENT METRICS ARE IN BOLD .
Databases
ExYaleB
COIL 20
USPS
MNIST
•
KTRR
22.96
47.62
6.50
11.66
16.92
27.82
22.56
33.96
t1
t2
t1
t2
t1
t2
t1
t2
TRR
23.71
48.8
6.54
12.75
11.95
22.74
22.43
32.35
KLRR
45.82
71.26
16.11
25.55
29.41
39.93
34.20
44.64
KSSC
5512.68
5543.4
1466.12
1472.07
2752.97
2763.19
5742.89
5753.42
LatLRR
772.44
806.43
579.01
584.46
50.05
58.98
246.35
270.19
The Wilcoxon’s rank sum test [41] at a 0.05 significance
level shows there is no significant difference between
the time costs of the KTRR and TRR on the similarity
graph construction and the whole clustering process on
the tested four databases.
The KTRR and TRR [17] algorithms are much faster
than KSSC, SSC, KLRR, and LRR methods. The results
are consist with the fact that the theocratical computation
complexities of KTRR and TRR are much lower than that
of KSSC, SSC, KLRR, and LRR methods. The KTRR
and TRR [17] algorithms both have analytical solutions,
and only one pseudo-inverse operation is required for
solving the representation problems of all data points for
KTRR and TRR algorithms.
G. Clustering Performance with Varying Number of Subjects
In this subsection, we investigate the clustering performance
of the proposed method with a different number of subjects
on COIL 100 image database. The experiments are carried out
on the first t classes of the database, where t increases from
10 to 100 with an interval of 10. The clustering results are
shown in Fig. 6.
100
Clustering Quality (%)
95
90
85
80
75
70
65
10
Accuracy
20
30
NMI
40
ARI
50
Fscore
60
70
80
90
100
The number of subjects
Fig. 6. The clustering quality of the proposed method on the first g subjects
of COIL 100 database.
From the results, we can see that:
• In general, with the number of subjects increase, the
clustering performance is decreased since the clustering difficulty is increasing with the number of subjects
growth.
• With increasing number of subjects, the N M I of KTRR
is changed slightly, varying from 100% to 90%. The
LRR1
248.94
286.91
430.23
436.59
43.34
51.88
155.70
167.25
•
LRR2
270.65
311.34
454.87
460.07
49.10
58.90
172.32
186.82
SSC
2301.75
2313.31
121.76
126.88
62.25
98.79
112.13
153.23
SMCE
10.15
45.18
5.76
10.12
67.44
76.50
16.78
25.52
LSA
198.48
229.26
61.14
66.01
108.67
120.46
142.71
154.64
SC
0.33
124.45
0.15
7.61
0.14
11.73
1.09
14.65
possible reason is that the N M I is robust to the data
distribution (increasing subject number) [19].
The proposed method obtains satisfactory performance on
COIL 100 database. It achieves perfect clustering result
for t = 10, and gets the satisfactory performance at t =
100 with Accuracy, N M I, ARI, and F score be around
74%, 90%, 68%, and 68%, respectively.
H. Parameter Analysis
The KTRR has two parameters, the tradeoff parameter λ
and the thresholding parameter η. The selection of the values
of the parameters depends on the data distribution. A bigger λ
is suitable for highly corrupted databases, and η corresponds
to the dimensionality of the corresponding subspace for the
mapped data points.
To evaluate the impact of λ and k, we conduct the experiment on the ExYaleB and COIL20 databases. We set the λ
from 10−5 to 102 , and η from 1 to 50, the results are shown
in Fig. 7 and Fig. 8 .
From the results, we get the following observations:
• The proposed method achieves the best clustering performance with λ and η as 0.1 and 5 on ExYaleB database,
and 10 and 4 on COIL20 database, respectively.
• The proposed method can obtain satisfactory performance
with λ from 0.1 to 1 on ExYaleB database, where the
Accuracy, N M I, ARI, and F score are more than 85%,
90%, 75%, and 75%, respectively, and with λ from 0.2 to
100 on COIL20 database, where the Accuracy, N M I,
ARI, and F score are more than 80%, 90%, 80%, and
80%. The performance of KTRR is not sensitive to the
parameter of λ, which makes KTRR be suitable for the
real applications.
• The clustering quality with η from 3 to 10 on ExYaleB
and COIL20 databases are much better than other cases. It
means that the thresholding process is helpful to improve
the performance of KTRR, and the dimensionality of underlying subspaces of the ExYaleB and COIL20 databases
in the hidden space belongs the scope from 3 to 10.
I. Different Kernel Functions
The commonly used kernel functions are polynomial kernels, radial basis functions, and sigmoid kernels. To investigate
the performance of the proposed method using different kernels, we study six different kernel functions. The results on
100
80
90
70
60
50
0.1
0.5
1
λ
5
10
3
4
6
5
7
100
80
70
60
50
40
Accuracy
NMI
ARI
Fscore
30
10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.7 0.8
η
Clustering Quality (%)
90
Clustering Quality (%)
Accuracy (%)
10
1
80
60
40
20
Accuracy
0
10 102
1
2
3
4
The tradeoff parameter λ
(a)
5
NMI
6
7
ARI
8
9
Fscore
10 20 30 40 50
The thresholding parameter η
(b)
(c)
Fig. 7. Clustering performance of the proposed method on ExYaleB database. (a) Clustering performance of the proposed method versus different values of
λ and η. (b) Clustering performance of the proposed method versus different values of λ, and fix η = 5. (c) Clustering performance of the proposed method
versus different values of η, and fix λ = 0.5.
100
80
70
60
50
0.01
0.1
100
90
80
70
60
50
Accuracy
7
1
λ
6
10
5
100
4
3
η
Clustering Quality (%)
Clustering Quality (%)
Accuracy (%)
90
NMI
ARI
40
10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.7 0.8
Fscore
1
10 102
80
60
40
20
Accuracy
0
1
2
3
5
NMI
6
7
ARI
8
9
Fscore
10 20 30 40 50
The thresholding parameter η
The tradeoff parameter λ
(a)
4
(b)
(c)
Fig. 8. Clustering performance of the proposed method on COIL20 database. (a) Clustering performance of the proposed method versus different values of
λ and η. (b) Clustering performance of the proposed method versus different values of λ, and fix η = 4. (c) Clustering performance of the proposed method
versus different values of η, and fix λ = 10.
TABLE VIII
P ERFOMANCE COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT KERNEL FUNCTIONS USED IN THE PROPOSED METHOD . T HE PARAMETER OF σ IS SETTING AS THE MEAN OF
THE DISTANCES BETWEEN ALL THE SAMPLES . T HE BEST MEAN RESULTS IN DIFFERENT METRICS ARE IN BOLD .
Function κ(xi , xj )
USPS
MNIST
AC
NMI
ARI
Fscore
AC
NMI
ARI
Fscore
e
80.38+19.04
76.08+9.75
70.10+15.43
73.25+13.45
65.58+11.65
64.27+6.25
51.62+10.21
56.70+8.92
72.31+18.06
67.38+14.41
59.48+17.11
63.78+15.06
66.48+14.54
63.49+6.50
51.54+11.54
56.61+10.09
81.36+14.93
78.04+6.63
71.73+12.67
74.69+11.13
63.97+8.11
66.81+4.43
52.63+5.04
57.92+4.16
kxi −xj k2
•
•
kxi −xj k2
σ2
2
(xT
i xj )
USPS and MINIST databases are shown in Table VIII, from
which we can get the following observations:
•
−
3
(xT
i xj )
achieves the
The kernel function κ(xi , xj ) = e− σ2
best performance on USPS database. While the kernel
function κ(xi , xj ) = (xTi xj )2 obtains the best performance on MNIST database.
The kernel function κ(xi , xj ) = (xTi xj )3 outperforms
κ(xi , xj ) = (xTi xj )2 on USPS database, which is different to that on MNIST database. It is mainly caused
by the fact that the images from USPS database lie in
much higher nonlinear subspaces than that from MNIST
database, and the former function induced a much more
nonlinear mapping.
The selection of different kernels results in a great
e−
kxi −xj k
σ
74.97+12.40
75.59+9.22
65.98+13.81
69.72+11.83
59.21+14.27
63.54+12.66
48.62+16.10
54.50+13.94
1
kxi −xj k2
1
kxi −xj k
79.62+17.69
74.18+13.08
68.32+19.86
71.68+17.47
61.62+12.43
64.00+9.32
50.18+11.25
55.63+9.71
73.64+14.46
74.58+8.01
64.62+14.44
68.53+12.38
62.06+9.67
65.33+5.59
51.20+7.18
56.66+6.13
difference in the subspace clustering performance both
on USPS database and MNIST database.
V. C ONCLUSION
In this paper, we have incorporated the kernel technique into
TRR method to achieve robust nonlinear subspace clustering.
It does not need the prior knowledge about the structure of
errors in the input data and remedies the drawback of the
existing TRR method that it cannot deal with the data points
from nonlinear subspaces. Moreover, through the theoretical
analysis of our proposed mathematical model, we find that
the developed optimization problem can be solved analytically,
and the closed-form solution is only dependent on the kernel
matrix. Theses advantages make our proposed method useful
in many real-world applications. Comprehensive experiments
11
on four real-world image databases have demonstrated the
effectiveness and the efficiency of the proposed method.
In the future, we plan to conduct a systematical investigation
on the selection of optimal kernel for our proposed method and
study how to determine the number of nonlinear subspaces
automatically.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under grants 61432012,
61329302, and the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) of U.K. under grant EP/J017515/1.
R EFERENCES
[1] L. Parsons, E. Haque, and H. Liu, “Subspace clustering for
high dimensional data: a review,” ACM SIGKDD Explorations
Newsletter, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 90–105, 2004.
[2] P. S. Bradley and O. L. Mangasarian, “k-plane clustering,”
Journal of Global Optimization, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 23–32, 2000.
[3] S. R. Rao, R. Tron, R. Vidal, and Y. Ma, “Motion segmentation
via robust subspace separation in the presence of outlying,
incomplete, or corrupted trajectories,” in Computer Vision and
Pattern Recognition, 2008. CVPR 2008. IEEE Conference on.
IEEE, 2008, pp. 1–8.
[4] H. Derksen, Y. Ma, W. Hong, and J. Wright, “Segmentation
of multivariate mixed data via lossy coding and compression,”
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 29, no. 9, p. 15461562, 2007.
[5] J. P. Costeira and T. Kanade, “A multibody factorization method
for independently moving objects,” International Journal of
Computer Vision, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 159–179, 1998.
[6] C. W. Gear, “Multibody grouping from motion images,” International Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 133–
150, 1998.
[7] R. Vidal, Y. Ma, and S. Sastry, “Generalized principal component analysis,” Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE
Transactions on, vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 1945–1959, 2005.
[8] A. Y. Ng, M. I. Jordan, and Y. Weiss, “On spectral clustering:
Analysis and an algorithm,” in Advances in Neural Information
Processing Systems, vol. 14, 2002, Conference Proceedings, pp.
849–856.
[9] U. Von Luxburg, “A tutorial on spectral clustering,” Statistics
and Computing, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 395–416, 2007.
[10] B. Cheng, J. Yang, S. Yan, Y. Fu, and T. S. Huang, “Learning
with ℓ1 -graph for image analysis,” IEEE Transactions on Image
Processing, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 858–866, April 2010.
[11] E. Elhamifar and R. Vidal, “Sparse subspace clustering: Algorithm, theory, and applications,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern
Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 2765–
2781, 2013.
[12] G. Liu, Z. Lin, S. Yan, J. Sun, Y. Yu, and Y. Ma, “Robust
recovery of subspace structures by low-rank representation,”
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 171–184, 2013.
[13] C. Y. Lu, H. Min, Z. Q. Zhao, L. Zhu, D. S. Huang, and
S. C. Yan, “Robust and efficient subspace segmentation via least
squares regression,” in Proc. of 12th Eur. Conf. Comput. Vis.,
Florence, Italy, Oct. 2012, pp. 347–360.
[14] C. Lu, J. Tang, M. Lin, L. Lin, S. Yan, and Z. Lin, “Correntropy
induced l2 graph for robust subspace clustering,” in 2013 IEEE
International Conference on Computer Vision, Dec 2013, pp.
1801–1808.
[15] V. M. Patel and R. Vidal, “Kernel sparse subspace clustering,” in
Image Processing (ICIP), 2014 IEEE International Conference
on. IEEE, 2014, Conference Proceedings, pp. 2849–2853.
[16] L. Zhen, Z. Yi, X. Peng, and D. Peng, “Locally linear representation for image clustering,” Electronics Letters, vol. 50, no. 13,
pp. 942–943, 2014.
[17] X. Peng, Z. Yi, and H. Tang, “Robust subspace clustering
via thresholding ridge regression,” in The Twenty-Ninth AAAI
Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2015, Conference Proceedings, pp. 3827–3833.
[18] H. Liu, T. Liu, J. Wu, D. Tao, and Y. Fu, “Spectral ensemble
clustering,” in Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.
ACM, 2015, pp. 715–724.
[19] X. Peng, H. Tang, L. Zhang, Z. Yi, and S. Xiao, “A unified
framework for representation-based subspace clustering of outof-sample and large-scale data,” IEEE Transactions on Neural
Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 2499–2512,
Dec 2016.
[20] X. Peng, C. Lu, Y. Zhang, and H. Tang, “Connections between nuclear norm and frobenius norm based representation,”
IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems,
vol. PP, no. 99, pp. 1–7, 2016.
[21] E. Elhamifar and R. Vidal, “Sparse subspace clustering,” in
IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition,
2009, Conference Proceedings, pp. 2790–2797.
[22] S. R. Rao, R. Tron, R. Vidal, and Y. Ma, “Motion segmentation
via robust subspace separation in the presence of outlying,
incomplete, or corrupted trajectories,” in Computer Vision and
Pattern Recognition, 2008. CVPR 2008. IEEE Conference on.
IEEE, 2008, pp. 1–8.
[23] Z. Yu, H.-S. Wong, and H. Wang, “Graph-based consensus
clustering for class discovery from gene expression data,”
Bioinformatics, vol. 23, no. 21, pp. 2888–2896, 2007.
[24] S. Xiao, M. Tan, D. Xu, and Z. Y. Dong, “Robust kernel lowrank representation,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks
and Learning Systems, 2015.
[25] G. Liu and S. Yan, “Latent low-rank representation for subspace
segmentation and feature extraction,” in 2011 International
Conference on Computer Vision, Nov 2011, pp. 1615–1622.
[26] E. Elhamifar and R. Vidal, “Sparse manifold clustering and
embedding,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing
Systems, 2011, Conference Proceedings, pp. 55–63.
[27] X. Peng, S. Xiao, J. Feng, W. Yau, and Z. Yi, “Deep subspace
clustering with sparsity prior,” in Proceedings of the 25
International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, New
York, NY, USA, 9-15 July 2016, pp. 1925–1931. [Online].
Available: http://www.ijcai.org/Abstract/16/275
[28] X. Peng, J. Feng, J. Lu, W.-Y. Yau, and Z. Yi, “Cascade subspace clustering,” in Proceedings of the 31th AAAI Conference
on Artificial Intelligence. SFO, USA: AAAI, Feb. 2017, pp.
2478–2484.
[29] J. Shawe-Taylor and N. Cristianini, Kernel methods for pattern
analysis. Cambridge university press, 2004.
[30] V. M. Patel and R. Vidal, “Kernel sparse subspace clustering,”
in 2014 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing
(ICIP). IEEE, 2014, pp. 2849–2853.
[31] K.-C. Lee, J. Ho, and D. J. Kriegman, “Acquiring linear
subspaces for face recognition under variable lighting,” Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on,
vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 684–698, 2005.
[32] S. K. N. S. A. Nene and H. Murase, “Columbia object image
library (coil-20),” Report, 1996.
[33] ——, “Columbia object image library (coil-100),” Report, 1996.
[34] J. J. Hull, “A database for handwritten text recognition research,” Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE
Transactions on, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 550–554, 1994.
[35] Y. LeCun, L. Bottou, Y. Bengio, and P. Haffner, “Gradient-based
learning applied to document recognition,” Proceedings of the
IEEE, vol. 86, no. 11, pp. 2278–2324, 1998.
[36] D. Cai, X. He, J. Han, and T. S. Huang, “Graph regularized
nonnegative matrix factorization for data representation,” Pat-
12
[37]
[38]
[39]
[40]
[41]
tern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on,
vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 1548–1560, 2011.
J. Yan and M. Pollefeys, “A general framework for motion
segmentation: Independent, articulated, rigid, non-rigid, degenerate and non-degenerate,” in European conference on computer
vision. Springer, 2006, pp. 94–106.
X. Zheng, D. Cai, X. He, W.-Y. Ma, and X. Lin, “Locality
preserving clustering for image database,” in Proceedings of
the 12th annual ACM international conference on Multimedia.
ACM, Conference Proceedings, pp. 885–891.
L. Hubert and P. Arabie, “Comparing partitions,” Journal of
classification, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 193–218, 1985.
C. Goutte and E. Gaussier, A probabilistic interpretation of
precision, recall and F-score, with implication for evaluation.
Springer, 2005, pp. 345–359.
J. D. Gibbons and S. Chakraborti, Nonparametric statistical
inference. Springer, 2011.
| 2cs.AI
|
arXiv:1704.08676v1 [cs.LG] 27 Apr 2017
A quantitative assessment of the effect of different
algorithmic schemes to the task of learning the structure
of Bayesian Networks
Stefano Berettaa , Mauro Castellib , Ivo Gonçalvesb,c , Daniele Ramazzottid,∗
a
DISCo, Universitá degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca. 20126 Milano, Italy
NOVA IMS, Universidade Nova de Lisboa. 1070-312 Lisboa, Portugal
c
CISUC, Department of Informatics Engineering, University of Coimbra, 3030-290
Coimbra, Portugal
d
Department of Pathology, Stanford University. California, USA
b
Abstract
One of the most challenging tasks when adopting Bayesian Networks (BNs)
is the one of learning their structure from data. This task is complicated
by the huge search space of possible solutions and turned out to be a wellknown N P -hard problem and, hence, approximations are required. However,
to the best of our knowledge, a quantitative analysis of the performance and
characteristics of the different heuristics to solve this problem has never been
done before.
For this reason, in this work, we provide a detailed study of the different
state-of-the-arts methods for structural learning on simulated data considering both BNs with discrete and continuous variables, and with different
rates of noise in the data. In particular, we investigate the characteristics
of different widespread scores proposed for the inference and the statistical
pitfalls within them.
Keywords: Bayesian Networks, Structure Learning, Heuristic Search,
Evolutionary Computation, Genetic Algorithms
∗
Corresponding author
Email addresses: [email protected] (Stefano Beretta),
[email protected] (Mauro Castelli), [email protected] (Ivo
Gonçalves), [email protected] (Daniele Ramazzotti)
Preprint submitted to Journal Name
April 28, 2017
1. Introduction
Bayesian Networks (BNs) have been applied to several different fields,
ranging from the water resources management [1] to the discovery of gene
regulatory networks [2, 3]. The task of learning a BN can be divided into
two subtasks: (1) structural learning, i.e., identification of the topology of the
BN, and (2) parametric learning, i.e., estimation of the numerical parameters
(conditional probabilities) for a given network topology. In particular, the
most challenging task of the two is the one of learning the structure of a
BN. Different methods have been proposed to face this problem, and they
can be classified into two categories [4, 5]: (1) methods based on detecting
conditional independencies, also known as constraint-based methods, and (2)
score+search methods, also known as score-based approaches.
As discussed in [6], the input of the former algorithms is a set of conditional independence relations between subsets of variables, which are used to
build a BN that represents a large percentage (and, whenever possible, all)
of these relations [7]. However, the number of conditional independence tests
that such methods should perform is exponential and, thus, approximation
techniques are required.
Although constraint-based learning is an interesting approach, as it is
close to the semantic of BNs, most of the developed structure learning algorithms fall into the score-based method category, given the possibility of
formulating such a task in terms of an optimization problem. As the name
implies, these methods have two major components: (1) a scoring metric
that measures the quality of every candidate BN with respect to a dataset,
and (2) a search procedure to intelligently move through the space of possible networks, as this space is enormous. More in detail, as shown in [8, 9],
searching this space for the optimal structure is an N P -hard problem, even
when the maximum number of parents for each node is constrained.
Hence, regardless of the strategy to learn the structure, one wishes to
pursue, greedy local search techniques and heuristic search approaches need
to be adopted to tackle the problem of inferring the structure of BNs. However, to the best of our knowledge, a quantitative analysis of the performance
of these different techniques has never been done. For this reason, here we
provide a detailed assessment of the performance of different state-of-thearts methods for structural learning on simulated data, considering both
BNs with discrete and continuous variables, and with different rates of noise
in the data. More precisely, we investigate the characteristics of different
2
scores proposed for the inference, and the statistical pitfalls within both the
constraint-based and score based techniques. Furthermore, we study the
impact of various heuristic search approaches, namely Hill Climbing, Tabu
Search, and Genetic Algorithms.
This work is structured as follows. In the next two Sections, we provide
a background on both Bayesian Networks and Heuristic Search Techniques
(see Section 2 and Section 3). In Section 4 we describe the results of our
study and in Section 5 we conclude the paper.
2. Bayesian Networks
BNs are graphical models representing the joint distribution over a set
of n random variables through a direct acyclic graph (DAG) G = (V, E),
where the n nodes in V represent the variables, and the arcs E encode any
statistical dependence among them. In this DAG, the set of variables with an
arc toward a given node X is its set π(X) of “parents”. When the structure
of a BN is known, it is possible to compute the joint distribution of all the
variables as the product of the conditional distributions on each variable
given its parents. However, even if we consider the simplest case of binary
variables, the number of parameters in each conditional probability table is
still exponential in size. For example, in the case of binary variables, the
total number
of parameters needed to compute the full joint distribution is
P |π(X)|
− 1, where |π(X)| is the cardinality of the parent set of
of size X 2
each node.
In the literature, there are two families of methods to learn the structure of a BN from data. The idea behind the first group of methods is
the one of learning the conditional independence relations of the BN from
which, in turn, the network is learned. These methods are often referred to
as constraint-based approaches. The second group of methods, the so-called
score-based approaches, formulates the task of structure learning as an optimization problem, with scores aimed at maximizing the likelihood of the data
given the model. However, both the approaches are known to lead to N P hard formulations and, because of this, heuristic methods need to be used to
find a “good” solution.
2.1. Constraint-based approaches
We now briefly describe the main idea behind this class of approaches.
For a detailed discussion of this topic we refer to [7, 10].
3
This class of methods aims at building a graph structure to reflect the dependence relations in the data that match the empirical distribution. Notwithstanding, the number of conditional independence tests that such algorithms
would have to perform among any pair of nodes to test all possible relations
is exponential and, because of this, the introduction of some approximations
is required.
We now provide some details on two constraint-based algorithms that
have been proven to be efficient and of widespread usage: the PC algorithm [7]
and the Incremental Association Markov Blanket (IAMB) [10].
The PC algorithm. This algorithm [7] starts with a fully connected graph
and, on the basis of pairwise independence tests, it iteratively removes all
the extraneous edges. To avoid an exhaustive search of separating sets, the
edges are ordered to consider the correct ones early in the search. Once a
separating set is found, the search for that pair ends. The PC algorithm
orders the separating sets by increasing values of size l, starting from 0 (the
empty set), until l = n − 2 (where n is the number of variables). The
algorithm stops when every variable has less than l − 1 neighbors since it
can be proven that all valid sets must have already been chosen. During the
computation, the bigger the value of l is, the larger the number of separating
sets must be considered. However, by the time l gets too big, the number
of nodes with degree l or higher must have dwindled considerably. Thus, in
practice, we only need to consider a small subset of all the possible separating
sets.
Incremental Association Markov Blanket algorithm. A different type of constraintbased learning algorithms uses the Markov blankets [11] to restrict the subset
of variables to test for independence. Thus, when this knowledge is available
in advance, we do not need to test a conditioning on all possible variables.
A widely used and efficient algorithm for Markov blanket discovery is IAMB
which, for each variable X, keeps track of a hypothesis set H(X). The goal is,
for a given H(X), to obtain at the end of the algorithm, a Markov blanket of
X equal to B(X). IAMB consists of a forward and a backward phase. During
the forward phase, it adds all the possible variables into H(X) that could
be in B(X), while in the backward phase, it removes all the false positive
variables from the hypotheses set, leaving the true B(X). The forward phase
begins with an empty H(X) for each X. Then, iteratively, variables with
a strong association with X (conditioned on all the variables in H(X)) are
4
added to the hypotheses set. This association can be measured by a variety
of non-negative functions, such as mutual information. As H(X) grows large
enough to include B(X), the other variables in the network will have very
little association with X, conditioned on H(X). At this point, the forward
phase is complete. The backward phase starts with H(X) that contains B(X)
and false positives, which will have small conditional associations, while true
positives will associate strongly. Using this test, the backward phase is able
to iteratively remove the false positives, until all but the true negatives are
eliminated.
2.2. Score-based approaches
These approaches aim at maximizing the likelihood L of a set of observed
data D, which can be computed as the product of the probability of each
observation. Formally,
Y
L(D) =
P (d)
d∈D
for a set of observations D. Since we want to infer a model G that best
explains the observed data, we define the likelihood of observing the data
given a specific model G as:
Y
LL(G, D) =
P (d|G) .
d∈D
Practically, however, for any arbitrary set of data, the most likely graph
is always the fully connected one, since adding an edge can only increase
the likelihood of the data, i.e., this approach overfits the data. To overcome
this limitation, the likelihood score is almost always combined with a regularization term that penalizes the complexity of the model in favor of sparser
solutions [11].
As already mentioned, such an optimization problem leads to intractability, due to the enormous search space of the valid solutions. Because of this,
the optimization task is often solved with heuristic techniques. Before moving
on to describe the main heuristic methods employed to face such complexity
(see Section 3), we now give a short description of a particularly relevant
and known score, called Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) [12], as an
example of scoring function adopted by several the score-based methods.
5
The Bayesian Information Criterion. BIC uses a score that consists of a
log-likelihood term and a regularization term that depend on a model G and
data D:
log m
dim(G)
(1)
bic(G, D) = LL(G, D) −
2
where D denotes the data, m denotes the number of samples, and dim(G)
denotes the number of parameters in the model. Since, in general, dim(·)
depends on the number of parents of each node, it is a good metric for model
complexity. Moreover, each edge added to G increases the complexity of the
model. Thus, the regularization term based on dim(·) favors graphs with
fewer edges and, more specifically, fewer parents for each node. The term
log m/2 essentially weighs the regularization term. The effect is that the
higher the weight, the more sparsity will be favored over “explaining” the
data through maximum likelihood.
Notice that the likelihood is implicitly weighted by the number of data
points since each point contributes to the score. As the sample size increases,
both the weight of the regularization term and the “weight” of the likelihood
increase. However, the weight of the likelihood increases faster than that of
the regularization term. This means that, with more data, the likelihood will
contribute more to the score, and we may trust our observations more and
have less need for regularization. Statistically speaking, BIC is a consistent
score [11]. Consequently, G contains the same independence relations as
those implied by the true structure.
3. Heuristic Search Techniques
We now describe some of the main state-of-the-art search strategies that
we took into account in this work. In particular, as stated in Section 1, we
considered the following search methods: Hill Climbing, Tabu Search, and
Genetic Algorithms.
3.1. Hill Climbing
Hill Climbing (HC) is one of the simplest iterative techniques that have
been proposed for solving optimization problems. While HC consists of a
simple and intuitive sequence of steps, it is a good search scheme to be used
as a baseline for comparing the performance of more advanced optimization
techniques.
6
Hill Climbing shares with other techniques (like Simulated Annealing [13]
and Tabu Search [14]) the concept of neighborhood. Search methods based on
this latter concept are iterative procedures in which a neighborhood N (i) is
defined for each feasible solution i, and the next solution j is searched among
the solutions in N (i). Hence, the neighborhood is a function N : S → 2S
that assigns to each solution in the search space S a (non-empty) subset of
S.
The sequence of steps of the Hill Climbing algorithm, for a minimization
problem w.r.t. a given objective function f , are the following:
1. choose an initial solution i in S;
2. find the best solution j in N (i) (i.e., the solution j such that f (j) ≤
f (k) for every k in N (i);
3. if f (j) > f (i), then stop; else set i = j and go to Step 2.
As it is clear from the aforementioned algorithm, Hill Climbing returns a
solution that is a local minimum for the problem at hand. This local minimum does not generally correspond to the global minimum for the problem
under exam, that is, Hill Climbing does not guarantee to return the best
possible solution for a given problem. To counteract this limitation, more
advanced neighborhood search methods have been defined. One of these
methods is Tabu Search, an optimization technique that uses the concept of
“memory”.
3.2. Tabu Search
Tabu Search (TS) is a meta-heuristic that guides a local heuristic search
procedure to explore the solution space beyond local optimality. One of the
main components of this method is the use of an adaptive memory, which creates a more flexible search behavior. Memory-based strategies are therefore
the main feature of TS approaches, founded on a quest for “integrating principles”, by which alternative forms of memory are appropriately combined
with effective strategies for exploiting them.
Tabus are one of the distinctive elements of TS when compared to Hill
Climbing or other local search methods. The main idea in considering tabus
is to prevent cycling when moving away from local optima through nonimproving moves. When this situation occurs, something needs to be done
to prevent the search from tracing back its steps to where it came from. This
is achieved by declaring tabu (disallowing) moves that reverse the effect of
recent moves. For instance, let us consider a problem where solutions are
7
binary strings of a prefixed length, and the neighborhood of a solution i
consists of the solutions that can be obtained from i by flipping only one of
its bits. In this scenario, if a solution j has been obtained from a solution i
by changing one bit b, it is possible to declare a tabu to avoid to flip back
the same bit b of j for a certain number of iterations (this number is called
the tabu tenure of the move). Tabus are also useful to help in moving the
search away from previously visited portions of the search space and, thus,
perform more extensive exploration.
As reported in [15], tabus are stored in a short-term memory of the search
(the tabu list) and usually, only a fixed limited quantity of information is
recorded. It is possible to store complete solutions, but this has a negative
impact on the computational time required to check whether a move is a
tabu or not and, moreover, it requires a vast amount of space. The second
option (which is the one commonly used) involves recording the last few
transformations performed to obtain the current solution and prohibiting
reverse transformations.
While tabus represent the main distinguish feature of TS, this feature
can introduce other issues in the search process. In particular, the use of
tabus can prohibit attractive moves, or it may lead to an overall stagnation
of the search process, with a lot of moves that are not allowed. Hence,
several methods for revoking a tabu have been defined [16], and they are
commonly known as aspiration criteria. The simplest and most commonly
used aspiration criterion consists of allowing a move (even if it is tabu) if it
results in a solution with an objective value better than that of the current
best-known solution (since the new solution has obviously not been previously
visited).
The basic TS algorithm, considering the minimization of the objective
function f , works as follows:
1. randomly select an initial solution i in the search space S, and set
i∗ = i and k = 0, where i∗ is the best solution so far, and k the
iteration counter;
2. set k = k +1 and generate the subset V of the admissible neighborhood
solutions of i (i.e., non-tabu or allowed by aspiration);
3. choose the best j in V and set i = j;
4. if f (i) < f (i∗ ), then set i∗ = i;
5. update the tabu and the aspiration conditions;
6. if a stopping condition is met then stop; else go to Step 2.
8
The most commonly adopted conditions to end the algorithm are when
the number of iterations (K) is larger than a maximum number of allowed
iterations, or if no changes to the best solution have been performed in the
last N iterations (as it is in our tests).
Specifically, in our experiments, we modeled for both HC and TS the
possible valid solutions in the search space as a binary adjacency matrix
describing acyclic directed graphs. The starting point of the search is the
empty graph (i.e. without any edge), and the search is stopped when the
current best solution cannot be improved with any move in its neighborhood.
The algorithms then consider a set of possible solutions (i.e., all the directed acyclic graphs) and navigate among them by means of 2 moves: insertion of a new edge or removal of an edge currently in the topology. We also
recall that in the literature many alternatives are proposed to navigate the
search space when learning the structure of Bayesian Networks, see [17, 18].
But, for the purpose of this work, we preferred to stick with the classical
(and simpler) ones.
3.3. Genetic Algorithms
Genetic Algorithms (GAs) [19] are a class of computational models that
mimic the process of natural evolution. GAs are often viewed as function
optimizers although the range of problems to which GAs have been applied
is quite broad. Their peculiarity is that potential solutions that undergo
evolution are represented as fixed length strings of characters or numbers.
Generation by generation, GAs stochastically transform sets (also called populations) of candidate solutions into new, hopefully improved, populations
of solutions, with the goal of finding one solution that suitably solves the
problem at hand. The quality of each candidate solution is expressed by
using a user-defined objective function called fitness. The search process of
GAs is shown in Figure 1.
To transform a population of candidate solutions into a new one, GAs
make use of particular operators that transform the candidate solutions,
called genetic operators: crossover and mutation. Crossover is traditionally
used to combine the genetic material of two solutions (parents) by swapping a part of one individual with a part of the other. On the other hand,
mutations introduce random changes in the structures of the solutions. In
order to be able to use GAs to solve a given optimization problem, candidate
solutions must be encoded into individuals (solutions) and, often, also the
genetic operators (crossover and mutation) must be adapted.
9
Figure 1: Typical workflow of a GA algorithm.
GAs have been widely used to learn the BN structure considering the
search space of the DAGs. In the large majority of the works [20, 21, 22, 23,
24, 25], the GA encodes the connectivity matrix of the BN structure in its
individuals. This is the same approach used in our study. Our GA follows
the common structure:
1. Generate the initial population
2. Repeat the following operations until the total number of generations
is reached:
(a) Select a population of parents by repeatedly applying the parent
selection method
(b) Create a population of offspring by applying the crossover operator
to each set of parents
(c) For each offspring, apply one of the mutation operators with a
given mutation probability
(d) Select the new population by applying the survivor selection method
3. Return the best performing individual
Unless stated otherwise, the following description is valid for both GA
variants (discrete and continuous). The initialization method and the variation operators used in our GA ensure that every individual is valid, i.e., each
individual is guaranteed to be an acyclic graph. The initialization method
creates individuals with exactly N/2 connections between variables, where
N is the total number of variables. A connection is only added if the graph
10
remains acyclic. The nodes being connected are selected with uniform probability from the set of variables. In the continuous variant, the value associated
with each connection is randomly generated between 0.0 and 1.0, with uniform probability. The crossover operates over two parents and returns one
offspring. The offspring is initially a copy of the first parent. Afterward,
a node with at least one connection is selected from the second parent and
all the valid connections starting from this node are added to the offspring.
Three mutation operators are considered in our GA implementation: add
connection mutation, remove connection mutation, and perturbation mutation. The first two are applied in both GA variants, while the perturbation
mutation is only applied in the continuous variant. The offspring resulting
from the add connection mutation operator differs from the parent in having
an additional connection. The newly connected nodes are selected with uniform probability. In the continuous variant, the value associated with the new
connection is randomly generated between 0.0 and 1.0 with uniform probability. Similarly, the offspring resulting from the remove connection mutation
operator differs from the parent in having one less connection. The nodes
to be disconnected are selected with uniform probability. The perturbation
mutation operator applies Gaussian perturbations to the values associated
with at most N/2 connections. The total number of perturbations may be
less than N/2 if the individual being mutated has less than N/2 connections.
Each value is perturbed following a Gaussian distribution having mean 0.0
and standard deviation 1.0. Any resulting value below 0.0 or above 1.0 is
bounded to 0.0 or 1.0, respectively. Regardless of the GA variant, mutation
is applied with a probability of 0.25. When a mutation is being applied,
the specific mutation operator is selected with uniform probability from the
available options (two in the discrete variant, and three in the continuous
variant).
In terms of parameters, a population of size 100 is used, with the evolutionary process being able to perform 100 generations. Parents are selected
by applying a tournament of size 3. The survivor selection is elitist in the
sense that it ensures that the best individual survives to the next generation.
4. Results and Discussion
We made use of a large set of simulations on randomly generated datasets
with the aim of assessing the characteristics of the state-of-the-art techniques
for structure learning of BNs.
11
We generated data for both the case of discrete (2 values, i.e., 0 or 1) and
continuous (we used 4 levels, i.e., 1, 2, 3, and 4) random variables. For each of
them, we randomly generated both the structure (i.e, 100 weakly connected
DAGs having 10 and 15 nodes) and the related parameters (we generated
random values in (0, 1) for each entry of the conditional probability tables
attached to the network structure) to build the simulated BNs. We also
considered 3 levels of density of the networks, namely 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8 of the
complete graph. For each of these scenarios, we randomly sampled from the
BNs different datasets of sample sizes, parametrized based on the number of
nodes. Specifically, for networks of 10 variables, we generated datasets of 10,
50, 100, and 500 samples, while for 15 variables, we considered datasets of
15, 75, 150, and 750 samples. Furthermore, we also considered noise in the
samples as a set of random entries (both false positives and false negatives)
in the dataset. To this extent, we considered noise free dataset (noise rate
equals 0%) and dataset with an error rate of 10% and 20%. In total this led
us to a total number of 14400 random datasets.
For all of them, we considered both the constraint-based and the scorebased approaches to structural learning. From the former category of methods, we considered the PC algorithm [7] and the IAMB [10]. We recall that
these methods return a partially directed graph, leaving undirected the arcs
that are not unequivocally directable. In order to have a fair comparison
with the score-based method which returns DAGs, we randomly resolved the
ambiguities, by generating random solutions (i.e., DAGs) consistent with the
statistical constraints by PC and IAMB (that is, we select a random direction
for the undirected arcs).
Moreover, among the score-based approaches, we consider 3 maximum
likelihood scores, namely log-likelihood [11], BIC [12], and AIC [26] (for
continuous variables we used the corresponding Gaussian likelihood scores).
For all of them, we repeated the inference on each configuration by using
HC, TS, and GA as search strategies.
This led us to 11 different methods to be compared, for a total of 158400
independent experiments. To evaluate the obtained results, we considered
both false positives, FP (i.e., arcs that are not in the generative BN but
that are inferred by the algorithm) and false negatives, FN (i.e., arcs that
are in the generative BN but that are not inferred by the algorithm). Also,
with TP (true positives) being the arcs in the generative model and TN
(true negatives) the arcs that are not in the generative model, for all the
12
experiments we considered the following metrics:
P recision =
Specif icity =
TP
TP + FP
TN
TN + FP
Recall =
Accuracy =
TP
TP + FN
TP + TN
TP + FP + TN + FN
4.1. Results of the Simulations
In this Section, we comment on the results of our simulations. As anticipated, we computed precision, recall (sensitivity), and specificity, as well as
accuracy and Hamming distance, to assess the performances and the underfit/overfit trade-off of the different approaches. Overall, from the obtained
results, it is straightforward to notice that methods including more edges
in the inferred networks are also more subject to errors in terms of accuracy, which may also resemble a bias of this metric that tends to penalize
solutions with false positive edges rather than false negatives. On the other
hand, since a typical goal of the problems involving the inference of BNs is
the identification of novel relations (that is, proposing novel edges in the network), underfitting approaches could be more effective in terms of accuracy,
but less useful in practice.
With a more careful look, the first evidence we obtained from the simulations is that the two parameters with the highest impact on the inferred
networks are the density and the number of nodes (i.e., network size). For
this reason, we first focused our attention on these two parameters, and we
analyzed how the different tested combinations of methods and scores behave.
As shown in Figure 2, all the approaches seem to perform better when
dealing with low-density networks, in fact, for almost all the methods the
accuracy is higher for density equal to 0.4, while it is lower for density equal
to 0.8. Since each edge of the network is a parameter that has to be “learned”,
it is reasonable to think that, the more edges are present in the BN, the harder
becomes the problem to be solved when learning it. Moreover, we can also
observe that the results in terms of accuracy obtained for BN of discrete
variables are slightly better than those achieved on the continuous ones. To
this extent, the only outlier is the loglik score combined with Hill Climbing
and with Tabu Search on datasets with continuous variables, for which the
trend is the opposite, w.r.t. that of all the other approaches. In fact, in both
these cases, the accuracy is higher on high-density datasets, and this is likely
13
Density
aic−ga
aic−hc
aic−tb
bic−ga
bic−hc
0.4
0.6
bic−tb
0.8
iamb
loglik−ga loglik−hc loglik−tb
pc
1.00
●
●
●
●
●
●
0.75
0.50
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
Accuracy
●
●
0.25
●
●
●
1.00
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
discrete
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
0.25
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
0.75
0.50
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
continuous
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
Figure 2: Boxplots showing the accuracy of the results obtained by the 11 tests approaches
on the discrete and continuous datasets.
due to a very high overfit of the approach. It is interesting to notice that
Genetic Algorithms (combined with the loglik score) is less affected by this
problem, and this trend will also be shown in the next analyses.
In addition to the accuracy, we also computed the Hamming distance
between the reconstructed solutions and the BNs used to generate the data,
in order to quantify the errors of the inference process. This analysis showed
that, besides the network density, also the number of nodes (parameters to
be learned) influences the results, as reported in Figure 3. It is interesting
to observe that, in the adopted experimental setup, we set the number of
samples to be proportional to the number of nodes of the network, that is,
for 10 nodes, in the same configurations we have a lower number of samples,
compared to the ones for 15 nodes. From a statistical point of view alone, we
would expect the problem to be easier when having more samples to build
the BN, since this would lead to more statistical power, and, intuitively,
should compensate for the fact that with 15 nodes we have more parameters
to learn than the ones for the case of 10 nodes. While this may be the case
(in fact we have similar accuracy for both 10 and 15 nodes), we also observe a
constantly higher Hamming distance with more nodes. In fact, when dealing
with more variables we observed a shift in the performance, that is, even
when the density is low, we observe more errors manifesting with higher
14
Density
aic−ga
aic−hc
aic−tb
bic−ga
bic−hc
0.4
0.6
bic−tb
0.8
iamb
loglik−ga loglik−hc loglik−tb
pc
300
continuous
10
200
100
0
300
continuous
15
200
Count
100
0
300
discrete
10
200
100
0
300
discrete
15
200
100
75
0
50
25
75
50
0
25
75
50
0
25
75
50
0
25
75
50
0
25
75
50
0
25
75
50
0
25
75
50
0
25
75
0
50
25
75
50
0
25
75
50
0
25
0
Hamming Distance
Figure 3: Bar plots showing the Hamming distances of the solutions obtained by the 11
tested approaches, grouped by type of dataset (discrete and continuous) and number of
nodes of the network (10 and 15), while colors represent densities (0.4, 0.6, and 0.8).
values in terms of Hamming distance. This is due to the fact that, when
increasing the number of variables, we also increase the complexity of the
solutions.
A further analysis we performed was devoted to assessing the impact
of both overfit and underfit. As it is possible to observe from the plots
in Figure 4 and Figure 5, we obtain two opposite behaviors, namely, the
combinations of scores and search strategies show evident different trends
in terms of sensitivity (recall ), specificity, and precision. In details, iamb
and pc tend to underfit, since they both produce networks with consistently
low density. While they achieve similar (high) results in terms of accuracy
(see Figure 2), their trend toward underfit does not make them suited for
the identification of novel edges, rather being more indicated for descriptive
15
aic−ga
aic−hc
aic−tb
bic−ga
bic−hc
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
Density
0.4
0.6
bic−tb
0.8
iamb
loglik−ga loglik−hc loglik−tb
pc
1.00
continuous
0.4
0.75
0.50
0.25
0.00
1.00
continuous
0.6
0.75
0.50
0.25
0.00
1.00
continuous
0.8
0.50
0.25
0.00
1.00
0.75
discrete
0.4
Recall (Sensitivity)
0.75
0.50
0.25
0.00
1.00
discrete
0.6
0.75
0.50
0.25
0.00
1.00
discrete
0.8
0.75
0.50
0.25
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
0.00
Precision
Figure 4: Violin plots showing Precision and Recall of the solutions obtained by the 11
tested approaches, grouped by the type of dataset (discrete and continuous) and density
values (0.4, 0.6, and 0.8).
purposes. On the other hand, the loglik score, (mostly) independently from
the adopted search technique, consistently overfits. Both these behaviors can
be observed in the violin plots of Figure 4 and Figure 5: for each density,
we can observe that iamb/pc results have very low recall values, while the
distribution of the results of the loglik score is centered on higher values.
The other two scores, i.e., AIC and BIC, present a better trade-off between
16
Density
aic−ga
aic−hc
aic−tb
bic−ga
bic−hc
0.4
0.6
bic−tb
0.8
iamb
loglik−ga loglik−hc loglik−tb
pc
1.00
continuous
0.4
0.75
0.50
0.25
0.00
1.00
continuous
0.6
0.75
0.50
0.25
0.00
1.00
continuous
0.8
0.50
0.25
0.00
1.00
0.75
discrete
0.4
Sensitivity (Recall)
0.75
0.50
0.25
0.00
1.00
discrete
0.6
0.75
0.50
0.25
0.00
1.00
discrete
0.8
0.75
0.50
0.25
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
0.00
Specificity
Figure 5: Violin plots showing Specificity and Sensitivity of the solutions obtained by
the 11 tested approaches, grouped by the type of dataset (discrete and continuous) and
density values (0.4, 0.6, and 0.8).
overfit and underfit, with BIC being less affected by the overfit, while AIC
reconstructing slightly denser networks. Once again, this trade-off between
the two regularizators is well-known in the literature and points to AIC being
more suited for predictions while BIC for descriptive purposes.
Another relevant result of our analysis is the characterization of the performance of Genetic Algorithms in terms of sensitivity (recall ). Specifically,
17
it must be noticed that for all the three regularizators, Genetic Algorithms
achieve similar results of both precision and specificity if compared with both
Hill Climbing and Tabu Search, but in terms of sensitivity (recall ) it presents
reduced overfit. In fact, as it is possible to observe in the plots of Figure 4
and Figure 5 for each score (i.e., loglik, AIC, and BIC), the sensitivity results
of Genetic Algorithms are lower than that of both Hill Climbing and Tabu
Search, highlighting the reduced impact of overfit.
In summary, we can draw the following conclusions.
• (i) dense networks are harder to learn, see Figure 2;
• (ii) the number of nodes effects the complexity of the solutions, leading
to higher Hamming distance (number of errors) even if with similar
accuracy, see Figure 2 and Figure 3;
• (iii) networks with continuous variables are harder to learn compared
to the binary ones, see Figure 2;
• (iv) iamb and pc algorithms tend to underfit, while loglik overfits, see
Figure 4 and Figure 5;
• (v) Genetic Algorithms tend to reduce underfit, see Figure 4 and Figure 5.
We conclude the section by providing p−values by MannWhitney U
test [27] in support of such claims in Table 4.1. The claim for greater and
less values, i.e., accuracy, are performed with the one-tail test alternatives.
The tests are performed on all the configurations of our simulations.
5. Conclusions
Bayesian Networks are a widespread technique to model dependencies
among random variables. A challenging problem when dealing with BNs is
the one of learning their structures, i.e., the statistical dependencies in the
data, which may sometime pose a serious limit to the reliability of the results.
Despite their extensive use in a vast set of fields, to the best of our
knowledge, a quantitative assessment of the performance of different stateof-the-art methods to learn the structure of BNs has never been performed.
In this work, we aim at going in the direction of filling this gap and we presented a study of different state-of-the-art approaches for structural learning
18
Comparison
Metric
Test
p−value
Mean 1 Mean 2
density 0.4/0.8 accuracy greater < 2.2e − 16
0.68
0.55
nodes 10/15
accuracy
less
< 2.2e − 16
0.61
0.62
nodes 10/15
Hamming
less
< 2.2e − 16
17.40
39.54
discr./contin.
accuracy greater < 2.2e − 16
0.62
0.61
iamb/hc loglik sensitivity
less
< 2.2e − 16
0.02
0.59
iamb/hc loglik specificity greater < 2.2e − 16
0.98
0.38
ga/hc
sensitivity
less
< 2.2e − 16
0.24
0.32
ga/hc
specificity greater < 2.2e − 16
0.79
0.71
Table 1: Summary of the major findings. The results of the MannWhitney U test [27]
(one-tail test alternatives) in support of the results of our simulations are shown. The tests
are performed on all the settings, with the comparisons as described in the first column
of the table. We also show the considered metric, the adopted alternative of the one-tail
test, the obtained p−value, and the mean of the two compared distributions of results.
of Bayesian Networks on simulated data, considering both discrete and continuous variables.
To this extent, we investigated the characteristics of 3 different likelihood
score, combined with 3 commonly used search strategies schemes (namely,
Genetic Algorithms, Hill Climbing, and Tabu Search), as well as 2 constraintbased techniques for the BN inference (i.e., iamb and pc algorithms).
Our analysis showed the factors leading to higher effects on the performance, i.e., density, number of variables, and variable type (discrete vs
continuous). As expected, these settings effect the number of parameters to
be learned, hence complicating the optimization task. Furthermore, we also
discussed the overit/underfit trade-off of the different tested techniques with
the constraint-based approaches showing trends toward underfitting, and the
loglik score showing high overfit. Interestingly, in all the configurations, Genetic Algorithms showed evidence of reducing the overfit, leading to denser
structures.
Overall, we place our work as a starting effort to better characterize the
task of learning the structure of Bayesian Networks from data, which may
lead in the future to a more effective application of this approach.
19
References
References
[1] S.-S. Leu, Q.-N. Bui, Leak prediction model for water distribution networks created using a bayesian network learning approach, Water Resources Management 30 (2016) 2719–2733.
[2] F. Dondelinger, S. Lèbre, D. Husmeier, Non-homogeneous dynamic
bayesian networks with bayesian regularization for inferring gene regulatory networks with gradually time-varying structure, Machine Learning
90 (2013) 191–230.
[3] W. C. Young, A. E. Raftery, K. Y. Yeung, Fast bayesian inference
for gene regulatory networks using scanbma, BMC Systems Biology 8
(2014) 47.
[4] W. Buntine, A guide to the literature on learning probabilistic networks
from data, IEEE Transactions on knowledge and data engineering 8
(1996) 195–210.
[5] R. Daly, Q. Shen, S. Aitken, Learning bayesian networks: approaches
and issues, The Knowledge Engineering Review 26 (2011) 99–157.
[6] P. Larrañaga, H. Karshenas, C. Bielza, R. Santana, A review on evolutionary algorithms in bayesian network learning and inference tasks,
Information Sciences 233 (2013) 109 – 125.
[7] P. Spirtes, C. N. Glymour, R. Scheines, Causation, prediction, and
search, MIT press, 2000.
[8] D. M. Chickering, Learning bayesian networks is np-complete, in: Learning from data, Springer, 1996, pp. 121–130.
[9] D. M. Chickering, D. Heckerman, C. Meek, Large-sample learning of
bayesian networks is np-hard, Journal of Machine Learning Research 5
(2004) 1287–1330.
[10] I. Tsamardinos, C. F. Aliferis, A. R. Statnikov, E. Statnikov, Algorithms
for large scale markov blanket discovery., in: FLAIRS conference, volume 2, pp. 376–380.
20
[11] D. Koller, N. Friedman, Probabilistic graphical models: principles and
techniques, MIT press, 2009.
[12] G. Schwarz, et al., Estimating the dimension of a model, The annals of
statistics 6 (1978) 461–464.
[13] C.-R. Hwang, Simulated annealing: theory and applications, Acta
Applicandae Mathematicae 12 (1988) 108–111.
[14] F. Glover, Tabu search-part i, ORSA Journal on computing 1 (1989)
190–206.
[15] M. Gendreau, J.-Y. Potvin, Handbook of metaheuristics, volume 2,
Springer, 2010.
[16] F. Glover, Tabu search: A tutorial, Interfaces 20 (1990) 74–94.
[17] D. M. Chickering, Learning equivalence classes of bayesian-network
structures, Journal of machine learning research 2 (2002) 445–498.
[18] M. Teyssier, D. Koller, Ordering-based search: A simple and effective algorithm for learning bayesian networks, arXiv preprint arXiv:1207.1429
(2012).
[19] D. E. Goldberg, J. H. Holland, Genetic algorithms and machine learning,
Machine learning 3 (1988) 95–99.
[20] C. Cotta, J. Muruzábal, Towards a more efficient evolutionary induction
of bayesian networks, in: International Conference on Parallel Problem
Solving from Nature, Springer, pp. 730–739.
[21] S. Van Dijk, D. Thierens, L. C. Van Der Gaag, Building a ga from design
principles for learning bayesian networks, in: Genetic and Evolutionary
Computation Conference, Springer, pp. 886–897.
[22] R. Etxeberria, P. Larrañaga, J. M. Picaza, Analysis of the behaviour of
genetic algorithms when learning bayesian network structure from data,
Pattern Recognition Letters 18 (1997) 1269–1273.
[23] K.-J. Kim, J.-O. Yoo, S.-B. Cho, Robust inference of bayesian networks
using speciated evolution and ensemble, in: International Symposium
on Methodologies for Intelligent Systems, Springer, pp. 92–101.
21
[24] M. Mascherini, F. M. Stefanini, M-ga: A genetic algorithm to search
for the best conditional gaussian bayesian network, in: International
Conference on Computational Intelligence for Modelling, Control and
Automation and International Conference on Intelligent Agents, Web
Technologies and Internet Commerce (CIMCA-IAWTIC’06), volume 2,
IEEE, pp. 61–67.
[25] P. Larrañaga, M. Poza, Y. Yurramendi, R. H. Murga, C. M. H. Kuijpers,
Structure learning of bayesian networks by genetic algorithms: A performance analysis of control parameters, IEEE transactions on pattern
analysis and machine intelligence 18 (1996) 912–926.
[26] H. Akaike, Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle, in: Selected Papers of Hirotugu Akaike, Springer, 1998,
pp. 199–213.
[27] H. B. Mann, D. R. Whitney, On a test of whether one of two random
variables is stochastically larger than the other, The annals of mathematical statistics (1947) 50–60.
22
| 2cs.AI
|
Causal Linearizability: Compositionality for Partially
Ordered Executions
Simon Doherty∗1 , John Derrick†1 , Brijesh Dongol‡2 , and Heike Wehrheim§3
1
Department of Computer Science, University of Sheffield, UK
Department of Computer Science, Brunel University London, UK
3
Department of Computer Science, University of Paderborn, Germany
arXiv:1802.01866v1 [cs.LO] 6 Feb 2018
2
February 7, 2018
Abstract
In the interleaving model of concurrency, where events are totally ordered, linearizability
is compositional: the composition of two linearizable objects is guaranteed to be linearizable.
However, linearizability is not compositional when events are only partially ordered, as in
many weak-memory models that describe multicore memory systems. In this paper, we
present causal linearizability, a correctness condition for concurrent objects implemented in
weak-memory models. We abstract from the details of specific memory models by defining
our condition using Lamport’s execution structures. We apply our condition to the C11
memory model, providing a correctness condition for C11 objects. We develop a proof
method for verifying objects implemented in C11 and related models. Our method is an
adaptation of simulation-based methods, but in contrast to other such methods, it does
not require that the implementation totally order its events. We also show that causal
linearizability reduces to linearizability in the totally ordered case.
1
Introduction
Linearizability [18, 19] is a well-studied [12] condition that defines correctness of a concurrent
object in terms of a sequential specification. It ensures that for each history of an implementation, there is a history of the specification such that (1) each thread makes the same method
invocations in the same order, and (2) the order of non-overlapping operation calls is preserved.
The condition however, critically depends on the existence of a total order of memory events
(e.g., as guaranteed by sequential consistency (SC) [24]) to guarantee contextual refinement [15]
and compositionality [18]. Unfortunately most modern systems can only guarantee a partial order of memory events, e.g., due to the effects of relaxed memory [1, 3, 4, 25]. It is known that a
naive adaptation of linearizability to the partially ordered setting of weak memory is problematic
from the perspective of contextual refinement [13]. In this paper, we propose a compositional
generalisation of linearizability for partially ordered executions.
Figs. 1 and 2 show two examples1 of multi-threaded programs on which weak memory model
∗ [email protected]
† [email protected]
‡ [email protected]
§ [email protected]
1 Example
inspired by H.-J.Boehm talk at Dagstuhl, Nov. 2017
1
x = 0, y = 0
Process 2
Process 1
1 : x := 1;
1 : if(y = 1)
2 : y := 1;
2 : assert(x = 1);
S = h i, S′ = h i
Process 2
Process 1
1 : S.Push(1);
1 : if(S’.Pop = 1)
2 : S’.Push(1); 2 : assert(S.Pop = 1);
Figure 1: Writing to shared variables
Figure 2: Writing to shared stacks
effects can be observed. Fig. 1 shows two threads writing to and reading from two shared
variables x and y. Under SC, the assert in process 2 never fails: if y equals 1, x must also equal
1. However, in weak memory models like the C11 model [4, 21], this is not true: if the writes
to x and y are relaxed, process 2 may observe the write to y, yet also observe the initial value x
(missing the write to x by process 1).
Such effects are not surprising to programmers familiar with memory models [4, 21]. However,
programmer expectations for linearizable objects, even in a weak memory model like C11, are
different: if the two stacks S and S′ in Fig. 2 are linearizable, the expectation is that the
assert will never fail since linearizable objects are expected to be compositional [18, 19], i.e.,
any combination of linearizable objects must itself be linearizable. However, it is indeed possible
for the two stacks to be linearizable (using the classical definition), yet for the program to generate
an execution in which the assert fails. The issue here is that linearizability, when naively applied
to a weak memory setting, allows too many operations to be considered “overlapping”.
Our key contribution in this paper is the development of a new compositional notion of
correctness, called causal linearizability, which is defined in terms of an execution structure [23],
taking two different relations over operations into account: a “precedence order” (describing
operations that are ordered in time) and a “communication relation”. Applied to Fig. 2, for
a weak memory execution in which the assert fails, the execution restricted to stack S would
not be causally linearizable in the first place. Namely, causal linearizability ensures enough
precedence order in an execution to ensure that the method call S.Push(1) occurs before S.Pop,
meaning S.Pop is forced to return 1.
Execution structures are generic, and can be constructed for any weak memory execution
that includes method invocation/response events. Our second contribution is one such scheme
for mapping executions to execution structures based on the happens-before relation of the C11
memory model. Given method calls m1 and m2, we say m1 precedes m2 if the response of m1
happens before the invocation m2; we say m1 communicates with m2 if the invocation of m1
happens before the response of m2.
Our third contribution is a new inductive simulation-style proof technique for verifying causal
linearizability of weak memory implementations of concurrent objects, where the induction is over
linear extensions of the happens-before relation. This is the first such proof method for weak
memory, and one of the first that enables full verification, building on existing techniques for
linearizability in SC [26, 12, 8]. Our fourth contribution is the application of this proof technique
to causal linearizability of the Treiber Stack in the C11 memory model.
We present our motivating example, the Treiber Stack in C11 in Section 2; describe the
problem of compositionality and motivate our execution-structure based solution in Section 3;
and formalise causal linearizability and prove compositionality in Section 4. Causal linearizability
for C11 is presented in Section 5, and verification of the stack described in Section 6.
2
Treiber Stack in C11
The example we consider (see Algorithm 1) is the well-studied Treiber Stack [28], executing in
a recent version of the C11 [22] memory model. In C11, commands may be annotated, e.g., R
2
Algorithm 1 Release-Acquire Treiber Stack
1: procedure Init
2:
Top := null;
3:
4:
5:
6:
7:
8:
9:
procedure Push(v)
n := new(node) ;
n.val := v ;
repeat
top :=A Top ;
n.nxt := top ;
until CASR (&Top, top, n)
10:
11:
12:
13:
14:
15:
16:
17:
procedure Pop
repeat
repeat
top :=A Top ;
until top 6= null ;
ntop := top.nxt ;
until CASR (&Top, top, ntop)
return top.val ;
(for release) and A (for acquire), which introduces extra synchronisation, i.e., additional order
over memory events [4, 21]. We assume racy read and write accesses that are not part of an
annotated command are unordered or relaxed, i.e., we do not consider the effects of non-atomic
operations [4]. Full details of the C11 memory model are deferred until Section 5.
Due to weak memory effects, the events under consideration, including method invocation and
response events are partially ordered. As we show in Section 3, it turns out that one cannot simply
reapply the standard notion of linearizability in this weaker setting; compositionality demands
that we use modified form: causal linearizability that additionally requires “communication”
across conflicting operations.
In Algorithm 1, all accesses to the shared variable Top are via an annotated command. Thus,
any read of Top (lines 7, 13) reading from a write to Top (lines 9, 16) induces happens-before
order from the write to the read. This order, it turns out, is enough to guarantee invariants that
are in turn strong enough to guarantee2 causal linearizability of the Stack (see Section 6).
Note that we modify the Treiber Stack so that the Pop operation blocks by spinning instead
of returning empty. This is for good reason - it turns out that the standard Treiber Stack (with a
non-blocking Pop operation) is not naturally compositional if the only available synchronisation
is via release-acquire atomics (see Section 7).
3
Compositionality and execution structures
This section describes the problems with compositionality for linearizability of concurrent objects
under weak execution environments (e.g., relaxed memory) and motivates a generic solution using
execution structures [23].
Notation. First we give some basic notation. Given a set X and a relation r ⊆ X ×X, we say r is
a partial order iff it is reflexive, antisymmetric and transitive, and a strict order, iff it is irreflexive,
antisymmetric and transitive. The support of r is denoted support (r) = dom(r) ∪ ran(r). A
partial or strict order r is a total order iff either (a, b) ∈ r or (b, a) ∈ r for all a, b ∈ support (r).
We typically use notation such as <, ≤, ≺,
to denote orders, and write, for example, a < b
instead of (a, b) ∈ <.
The operations of an object are defined by a set of labels, Σ. For concurrent data structures,
Σ = Inv × Res, where Inv and Res are sets of invocations and responses (including their input
2 Note that a successful CAS operation comprises both a read and a write access to Top, but we only require
release synchronisation here. The corresponding acquire synchronisation is provided via the earlier read in the
same operation. This synchronisation is propagated to the CAS by sequenced-before (aka program order), which,
in C11, is included in happens-before (see Section 6 for details).
3
and return values), respectively. For example, for a stack S of naturals, the invocations are given
by {Push(n) | n ∈ N} ∪ {Pop}, and the responses by N ∪ {⊥, empty}, and
ΣS = {(Push(n), ⊥), (Pop, n) | n ∈ N} ∪ {(Pop, empty)}
The standard notion of linearizability is defined for a concurrent history, which is a sequence (or
total order) of invocation and response events of operations.
Since operations are concurrent, an invocation of an operation may not be directly followed
by its matching response, and hence, a history induces a partial order on operations. For linearizability, we focus on the real-time partial order (denoted ), where, for operations o and o′ , we
say o
o′ in a history iff the response of operation o happens before the invocation of operation
′
o in the history. A concurrent implementation of an object is linearizable if the real-time partial
order ( ) for any history of the object can be extended to a total order that is legal for the
object’s specification [18]. It turns out that linearizability in this setting is compositional [18, 19]:
any history of a family of linearizable objects is itself guaranteed to be linearizable.
Unfortunately, histories in modern executions contexts (e.g., due to relaxed memory or distributed computation) are only partially ordered since processes do not share a single global
view of time. It might seem that this is unproblematic for linearizability and that the standard
definition can be straightforwardly applied to this weaker setting. However, it turns out that a
naive application fails to satisfy compositionality. To see this, consider the following example.
Example 1. Consider a
S and S’ that are both
S’.Push happens before
the invocation of S.Pop.
history h, partially ordered by a happens-before relation, for two stacks
initially empty (denoted by ⊥). Suppose that in h, the response of
the invocation of S.Pop, and the response of S.Push happens before
History h induces a partial order over these operations as shown below:
(S’.Pop, 11)
(S.Push(42), ⊥)
(S.Pop, 42)
(S’.Push(11), ⊥)
If we restrict the execution above to S only, we can obtain a legal stack behaviour by linearizing
(S.Push(42), ⊥) before (S.Pop, 42) without contradicting the real-time partial order
in the
diagram above. Similarly, the execution when restricted to S′ is linearizable. However, the full
execution is not linearizable: ordering both pushes before both pops contradicts the induced
real-time partial order ( above).
A key contribution of this paper is the development of a correctness condition, causal linearizability, that recovers compositionality of concurrent objects with partially ordered histories.
Our definition is based on two main insights.
The first insight is that one must augment the real-time partial order with additional information about the underlying concurrent execution. In particular, one must introduce information
about the communication when linearizing conflicting operations. Two operations conflict if they
do not commute according to the sequential specification, e.g., for a stack data structure, Push
and Pop are conflicting. Causal linearizability states that for any conflicting operations, say o
and o′ , that are linearized in a particular order, say o o′ , there must exist some communication
from o to o′ . We represent communication by a relation .
4
Example 2. Consider the partial order in Example 1. For both stacks S and S′ , the Push
must be linearized before the Pop, and hence, we must additionally have communication edges
as follows:
(S’.Pop, 11)
(S.Push(42), ⊥)
(S.Pop, 42)
(S’.Push(11), ⊥)
The second insight is that the operations and the induced real-time partial order, , extended
with a communication relation, , must form an execution structure [23], defined below.
Definition 3 (Execution structure). Given that E is a finite3 set of events, and ,
⊆ E ×E
are relations over E, an execution structure is a tuple (E, , ) satisfying the following axioms
for e1 , e2 , e3 ∈ E.
A1 The relation
is a strict order.
A2 Whenever e1
e2 , then e1
A3 If e1
e2
e3 or e1
A4 If e1
e2
e3
e2 and ¬(e2
e2
e1 ).
e3 , then e1
e4 , then e1
e3 .
e4 .
Example 4. Consider the execution depicted in Example 2. The requirements of an execution
structure, in particular axiom A4 necessitate that we introduce additional real-time partial order
edges
as follows.
(S’.Pop, 11)
(S.Push(42), ⊥)
(S.Pop, 42)
(S’.Push(11), ⊥)
For example, the edge (S.Pop, 42)
(S.Push(42), ⊥) is induced by the combination of edges
(S.Pop, 42) (S’.Push(11), ⊥) (S’.Pop, 11) (S.Push(42), ⊥) together with axiom A4.
A consequence of these additional real-time partial order edges is that S (and symmetrically
S’) is not linearizable since the edge (S.Pop, 42) (S.Push(42), ⊥) must be present even when
restricting the structure to S only. Hence compositionality no longer fails.
4
Causal linearizability
This section provides a formal definition of causal linearizability, and the compositionality theorem. We define sequential objects in Section 4.1, then define causal linearizability in Section 4.2.
4.1
Sequential specifications
Causal linearizability defines correctness of a concurrent object with respect to a sequential object
specification.
Definition 5 (Sequential object). A sequential object is a pair (Σ, legal ), where legal ⊆ Σ∗ is a
prefix-closed sequence of labels.
3 The
original presentation allows for infinite execution structures, placing a well-foundedness condition on
5
.
For example, in each legal sequence of a stack, each pop operation returns the value from the
latest push operation that has not yet been popped, or empty if no such operation exists.
For each sequential object, we define a conflict relation, # ⊆ Σ × Σ, based on the legal
behaviours of the object. Two operations conflict if they do not commute in some legal history:
o#o′ = ¬(∀k1 , k2 ∈ Σ∗ . k1 o o′ k2 ∈ legal ⇔ k1 o′ ok2 ∈ legal )
For a stack, we have, for instance, (Push(n), ⊥)#(Pop, n′ ) for any n, n′ , and for n 6= n′ ,
(Push(n), ⊥)#(Push(n′ ), ⊥).
We now show (in Lemma 6 below) that the order of conflicting actions in a sequential history
captures all the orders in that history that matter. This is formalized and proved using order
relations derived from a legal sequence. However, since the same action can occur more than
once in a legal sequence, we lift actions to events by enhancing each action with a unique tag and
process identifier4 . Thus, given a sequential object S = (Σ, legal ) an S-event is a triple (g, p, a)
where g is an event tag (taken from a set of tags G), p is a process (taken from a set of processes
P ) and a is a label in Σ. We let Evt be the set of all S-events, and for a sequence k ∈ Evt ∗ , ev (k)
be the set of events in k.
The definitions of legality and conflict as well as sequential specifications can naturally be
lifted to the level of events by virtue of the action labels. That is, a sequence of events is legal
if the sequence of actions it induces is legal. In the following, we therefore use legal to refer
to sequences of actions and sequences of events interchangeably. From a sequence k ∈ Evt ∗ we
derive two relations on events, a temporal ordering ( k ) and a causal ordering (≺k ), where:
e
k
e′ = ∃k1 , k2 , k3 ∈ Evt ∗ . k = k1 ek2 e′ k3
e ≺k e′ = e
k
e′ ∧ e#e′
Any sequential history that extends the causal order of a legal history is itself legal. We formalize
this in the following lemma.
Lemma 6 (Legal linear extensions). For a sequential object (Σ, legal ), if k ∈ legal and k ′ ∈ Evt ∗ ,
such that ev (k) = ev (k ′ ) and ≺k ⊆ k′ , then k ′ ∈ legal .
Proof. We transform k into k ′ by reordering events in k to match the order k′ . We only reorder
events that are not conflicting and thus, each step of the transformation preserves legality. This
is sufficent to prove that k ′ ∈ legal . Let a mis-ordered pair be any pair of events e, e′ such that
e k e′ but e′ k′ e. Note that in this case, we have e 6≺k e′ , because ≺k ⊆ k′ . Let e1 , e2 be a
mis-ordered pair with minimal distance in k between the two elements (i.e., so that the number
of events in k between e1 and e2 is minimal). We will reorder non-conflicting events in k so as to
eliminate this mis-ordered pair, or reduce its size without creating a new mis-ordered pair. Once
all mis-ordered pairs have been eliminated, we will have transformed k into k ′ , while preserving
the legality of k.
If e1 and e2 are adjacent in k, then because e1 6≺k e2 , we have ¬(e1 #e2 ), and thus we can
reorder them to form a new sequence legal with fewer mis-ordered pairs.
If e′1 #e2 then we would have e1 ≺k e′1 ≺k e2 and so e1 ≺k e2 , which is a contradiction. The
same argument shows that there is no event between e′1 and e2 that conflicts with both. So let
k ′′ be the sequence derived from k by reordering e′1 forward just past e2 . Note that because there
were no conflicts, k ′′ ∈ legal. It remains to show that k ′′ has no mis-ordered pairs that were not
already present in k. This could only happen if there was some e′2 such that e′1 S e′2 S e2 and
e′1 k′ e′2 . Because e1 , e2 is the mis-ordered pair with minimal gap in k, it must be that e′2 k′ e2 ,
but then e′2 k′ e1 while e1 k e′2 . Thus, in this case, e1 , e′2 forms a smaller mis-ordered pair,
contrary to hypothesis.
4 Strictly speaking, the process identifier is unimportant for Lemma 6, but we introduce it here to simplify
compatibility with the rest of this paper.
6
As we shall see, this lemma is critical in the proof of our compositionality result, Theorem 10.
4.2
Concurrent executions and causal linearizability
We now define causal linearizability. For simplicity, we assume complete concurrent executions,
i.e., executions in which every invoked operation has returned. It is straightforward to extend
these notions to cope with incomplete executions.
In general, executions of concurrent processes might invoke operations on several concurrent
objects. To capture this, we define a notion of object family, which represents a composition of
sequential objects, indexed by some set X.
Definition 7 (Object family). Suppose X is an index set. For each x ∈ X, assume a sequential
object Sx = (Σx , legal x ) such that Σx is disjoint from Σy for all y ∈ X\{x}. We define the object
family over X, SX = (ΣX , legal X ) by:
S
• ΣX = x Σx
• legal X = {k ∈ Σ∗X | ∀x. k ⇂ x ∈ legal x }, where k ⇂ x is the sequence k restricted to actions
of object x. Thus the set legal X contains exactly the interleavings of elements of each of
the legal x .
N.B., the pairwise disjointness requirement on Σx can be readily achieved by attaching the object
identifier x to each operation in Σx .
An execution structure (E, , ) is a complete S-execution structure iff all events in E are
S-events.
Definition 8 (Causal linearizability). Let SX = (ΣX , legal X ) be an object family. A complete
SX -execution structure (E, , ) is causally linearizable if there exists a k ∈ legal X with ev (k) =
E such that
⊆ k , and
⊇ ≺k .
Condition
⊆ k ensures that the real-time (partial) order of operations is consistent with
the chosen k, while condition
⊇ ≺k captures the idea that the causal ordering in k (i.e.,
the ordering between conflicting actions) requires a communication in the concurrent execution.
Causal linearizability for single objects is a special case of Definition 8, where the family is a
singleton set.
To establish compositionality, we must first define an object family’s causal ordering. Note
that because an object family’s legal set is just an interleaving of the underlying object’s legal
sets, operations from distinct objects can always be reordered, and therefore they never conflict.
Thus, we have the following lemma.
Lemma
S 9. Suppose SX = (ΣX , legal X ) is an object family. For any k ∈ legal X , we have
≺k = x∈X ≺k ⇂ x .
For an object family SX = (ΣX , legal X ) and x ∈ X, we let Ex be the SX -execution structure
E restricted to Σx .
Theorem 10 (Compositionality). Suppose SX = (ΣX , legal X ) is an object family over X, and
let E = (E, , ) be a complete SX -execution structure. Then, Ex is causally linearizable w.r.t.
Sx for all x ∈ X iff E is causally linearizable w.r.t. SX .
Proof. The implication from right to left is straightforward. For the other direction, for each
x ∈ X, let kx be the legal sequential execution witnessing causal linearizability of Ex . Let
be
the irreflexive transitive relation defined by
[
=( ∪
≺kx )+
x∈X
7
We show that
is acyclic, and is therefore a strict partial order. Because
is a partial order,
there is some total order
⊇
,
where
m
∈
legal
.
This
total
order
defines
a sequence of
m
X
labels of SX . We prove that this sequence witnesses the causal linearizability of E. By definition,
⊆ m for all x, and so by Lemma 6, we have m ⇂ x ∈ legal x (where m ⇂ x
we have ≺kx ⊆
is the restriction of m to the events of object x). Furthermore,
1.
⊆
2.
⊇ ≺kx follows from causal linearizability of Ex , and hence
m
follows from
⊆
⊆
m,
⊇
S
x∈X
≺kx , as required.
Thus, E is causally linearizable, as required.
We show that
is acyclic by contradiction. Suppose
contains a cycle. Pick P = e1
e2
...
en to be the minimal cycle. Since
is acyclic, and each ≺x is acyclic, the cycle P
must contain accesses to least two different objects. Without loss of generality, assume e1 and
e2 access different objects, i.e., e1 ∈ Ey , e2 ∈ Ez for some y 6= z. Since each ≺x only orders
e2 . Observe that P must be of length greater than two, i.e.,
elements of Ex , we must have e1
it cannot be of the form e1
e2
e1 since we would then have e1 e2 e1 , which contradicts
the assumption that
is a partial order.
Hence P must contain a third (distinct) element e3 . Note that e2 6 e3 , because otherwise
we could shorten the cycle P , using the transitivity of . Thus e2 , e3 are from the same object
z and e2 ≺kz e3 . By the causal linearizability of Ez , we must have e2 e3 . Let e be the element
of P following e4 (so possibly e = e1 ). Note that e3 6≺kz e, because otherwise we could shorten
e, so we have
the cycle P , using the transitivity of ≺kz . Thus, e3
e1
e2
e3
By the execution structure axiom A4, we have e1
···
e1 contradicting minimality of P .
4.3
e
e, and hence there exists a cycle e1
e
Relationship with classical linearizability
In this section, we show that classical linearizablity, which is defined for totally ordered histories of invocations (events of type Inv ) and responses (events of type Res), degenerates to
causal linearizability. As in the previous section, for simplicity, we assume the histories under
consideration are complete; extensions to cope with incomplete histories are straightforward.
First, we describe a method, inspired by the execution structure constructions given by
Lamport [23], for constructing execution structures for any well-formed partially ordered history.
We let Hist = (Inv ∪ Res) × (Inv ∪ Res) denote the type of all histories. A history is well-formed
if it is a partial order and the history restricted to each process is a total order of invocations
followed by their matching response. The set of all matching pairs of invocations and responses in
a history h is given by mp(h). A history is sequential iff it is totally ordered and each invocation
is immediately followed by its matching response. Note that a history could be totally ordered,
but not sequential (as is the case for the concurrent histories considered under SC [19, 18]).
Definition 11. Let h ⊆ Hist be a well-formed (partially ordered) history. We say exec(h) =
(E, , ) is the execution structure corresponding to h if
E = mp(h)
= {((i1 , r1 ), (i2 , r2 )) ∈ E × E | (r1 , i2 ) ∈ h}
= {((i1 , r1 ), (i2 , r2 )) ∈ E × E | (i1 , r2 ) ∈ h}
8
We now work towards the standard definition of linearizability. Recall that a sequential object
(see Definition 5) is defined in terms of sequences of labels of type Σ∗ , where Σ = Inv × Res,
whereas sequential histories are of type Hist . Thus, we define a function γ : Hist → Σ∗ such that
for each pair (i, r), (i′ , r′ ) ∈ mp(hs) of sequential history hs we have (r, i′ ) ∈ hs iff (i, r) γ(hs)
(i′ , r′ ). Thus, the order of operations in hs and γ(hs) are identical.
A complete history h is linearizable w.r.t. a (family of) sequential object(s) S = (Σ, legal ) iff
there exists a sequential history hs such that γ(hs) ∈ legal , for each process p, h ⇂ p = hs ⇂ p and
h ⊆ hs [18].
Theorem 12. Suppose h is a totally ordered complete history and S a (family of ) sequential
object(s). Then h is linearizable w.r.t S iff exec(h) is causally linearizable w.r.t. S.
5
Causal linearizability of C11 implementations
We now introduce the C11 memory model, where we adapt the programming-language oriented
presentation of C11 [21, 10], but we ignore various features of C11 not needed for our discussion,
including non-atomic operations and fences.
The C11 memory-model. Let L be a set of locations (ranged over by x, y), let V be a set of
values (ranged over by u, v). Our model employs a set of memory events, which can be partitioned
into read events, R, write events, W , and update events, U . Moreover, let Mod = W ∪ U be
the set of events that modify a location, and Qry = R ∪ U be the set of events that query
a location. For any memory event e, let loc(e) be the event’s location, and let ann(e) be the
event’s annotation. Let Loc(x) = {e | loc(e) = x}. For any query event let rval(e) be the value
read; and for any modification event let wval(e) be the value written. An event may carry a
synchronisation annotation, which may either be a release, R, or an acquire, A, annotation.
A C11 execution (not to be confused with an execution structure) is a tuple D = (D, sb, rf , mo)
where D is a set of events, and sb, rf , mo ⊆ D × D define the sequence-before, reads-from and
modification order relations, respectively. We say a C11 execution is valid when it satisfies:
(V1) sb is a strict order, such that, for each process p, the projection of sb onto p is a total order;
(V2) for all (w, r) ∈ rf , loc(w) = loc(r) and wval(w) = rval(r);
(V3) for all r ∈ D ∩ Qry, there exists some w ∈ D ∩ Mod such that (w, r) ∈ rf ;
(V4) for all (w, w′ ) ∈ mo, loc(w) = loc(w′ ); and
(V5) for all w, w′ ∈ W such that loc(w) = loc(w′ ), (w, w′ ) ∈ mo or (w′ , w) ∈ mo.
Other relations can be derived from these basic relations. For example, assuming DR and DA
denote the sets of events with release and acquire annotations, respectively, the synchronises-with
relation, sw = rf ∩ (DR × DA ), creates interthread ordering guarantees based on synchronisation
annotations. The from-read relation, fr = (rf −1 ; mo) \ Id, relates each query to the events in
modification order after the modification that it read from. Our final derived relation is the
happens before relation hb = (sb ∪ sw )+ , which formalises causality. We say that a C11 execution
is consistent if
(C1) hb is acyclic, and
(C2) hb; (mo ∪ rf ∪ fr ) is irreflexive.
9
Method invocations and responses. So far, the events apearing in our memory model are
standard. Our goal is to model algorithms such as the Treiber stack. Thus, we add method events
to the standard model, namely, invocations, Inv , and responses, Res. Unlike weak memory at
the processor architecture level, where program order may not be preserved [13], program order
in C11 is consistent with happens-before order, and hence, these can be introduced here in a
straightforward manner. The only additional requirement is that validity also requires (V6) sb
for each process projected restricted Inv ∪ Res must be alternating sequence of invocations and
matching responses, starting with an invocation.
Dynamic memory. To describe the behaviour of algorithms, such as the Treiber Stack, we
must define reads and writes to higher-level structures. To this end, we develop a simple theory
of references to objects, the fields of those objects and memory allocations for the object. We
let F be the set of all fields and A be the set of all memory allocation events, which is an event
of the form A(l) for a location l. We let . : L × F → L be the function that returns a location
for a given location, field pair. We use infix notation x.f for .(x, f ), where x ∈ L and f ∈ F .
We then introduce three additional constraints: (A1) for every a, a′ ∈ E ∩ A, if loc(a) = loc(a′ )
then a = a′ ; and (A2) if l.f = l′ .f ′ then l = l′ and f = f ′ . (A3) for all locations l and fields f
there are no allocations of the form A(l.f ).
From C11 executions to execution structures. A C11 execution with method invocations
and responses naturally gives rise to an execution structure. First, for a C11 execution F, let the
history of D, denoted hist(D) be the happens-before relation for D restricted to the invocation and
response events. By (V6), hist(D) is a well-formed history. Thus, we can apply the construction
defined in Section 4.3 to build an execution structure exec(hist(D)).
Definition 13. We say that a C11 execution D is causally linearizable w.r.t a sequential object
if exec(hist(D)) is.
We can now state a compositionality result for a C11 execution D of an object family X. The
property follows from Theorem 10 and the fact that for any object x ∈ X, exec(hist(Dx )) =
exec(hist(D))x , where Dx is D restricted to events of object x. Note that Dx contains all events
of x, i.e., all invocations, responses and low-level memory operations of x.
Corollary 14 (Compositionality for C11 executions). Suppose that SX = (ΣX , legal X ) is an
object family over X, and let D be an execution. Then, Dx is causally atomic w.r.t. Sx for all
x ∈ X iff D is causally atomic w.r.t. SX .
Finally, note that because the sb relation is included in hb, hist(D) includes program order
on the invocations and responses of D.
6
Verification
We now describe an operational method for proving that a given C11 execution is causally
linearizable w.r.t a given sequential object. Accordingly, we give a state-based, operational
model of a sequential object that generates legal sequences of labels (Definition 5), then present
a simulation-based proof rule for causal linearizability (Section 6.1). Then, we illustrate our
technique on the Treiber Stack (Section 6.2).
6.1
A simulation relation over happens-before
An operational sequential object is a tuple (Γ, init , τ ) where: Γ is a set of states; init ∈ Γ is the
initial state and τ : Γ × H × Inv →
7 Γ × H, where H = (Inv × Res)∗ , is a partial update function
10
that applies an invocation to a state and a history, returning the resulting state and updated
history. We require that for s ∈ Γ, h ∈ H and i ∈ Inv , there exists some r ∈ Res, such that
τ (s, h, i) = ( , h · h(i, r)i), where we use · for sequence concatenation. This response r is the
object’s response to the invocation i.
Example 15 (Operational sequential stack). A stack containing natural numbers can be represented as an operational sequential object in the following way. Let Γ = N∗ , init = h i and
define the update function as follows
τ (s, h, Push(n)) = (n · s, h · h(Push(n), ⊥)i)
τ (n · s, h, Pop) = (s, h · h(Pop, n)i)
for n ∈ N and s ∈ Γ. Note that assuming i is a stack invocation (as per Section 3), τ (s, i) is
defined iff s 6= h i or i 6= Pop.
Given an operational sequential object S = (Γ, init , τ ), it is easy to construct a corresponding
sequential object (in the sense of Definition 5). Let ΣS = Inv × Res and let legal S be the set of
histories returned by τ . Thus (ΣS , legal S ) is a sequential object, and our method verifies causal
linearizability w.r.t that object.
For the remainder of this section, fix a C11 execution D = (D, sb, rf , mo), and an operational
sequential object S = (Γ, init , τ ). We describe a method for proving that D is causally linearizable
w.r.t S. Our proof method is an induction on the length of some linear extension of D’s hb order.
The proof proceeds by remembering the set Z ⊆ D of events that have already been considered
by the induction, i.e., Z defines the current stage of the induction. The set Z is assumed to be
downclosed with respect to hb, i.e., if z ∈ Z and (z ′ , z) ∈ hb, then z ′ ∈ Z. At each stage of the
induction, we add an arbitrary e ∈
/ Z to Z, where e’s hb predecessors are already in Z (i.e., the
set Z ∪ {e} is also downclosed w.r.t. hb).
Correctness of each inductive step is formalised by a simulation relation, ρ, relating the events
in the current state, Z, to a state of the operational sequential object. Each inductive step of
the implementation must match a “move” of the sequential object, i.e., be a stutter step, or a
state update as given by the update function of the sequential object. Moreover, assuming that
ρ holds for Z (before each inductive step), ρ must hold after the step (i.e., for Z ∪ {e}).
Following the existing verification literature [12], we refer to events corresponding to nonstuttering steps as linearization points: the points where the high-level operation appears to
take effect. The verifier must define a function lp : D ∩ Inv → D to determine the memory
event that linearizes the given invocation, and this function must satisfy certain constraints with
respect to the simulation relation ρ, as described in Definition 16, below.
For each low-level operation, we must also determine the invocation and response to which
it belongs. Thus we also define a function µ : D → D ∩ Inv that maps each event in D to the
invocation responsible for producing e, and a function and ν : D → D ∩ Res that that maps e to
the response produced by e’s invocation. More formally, µ(e) is the latest invocation in sb-order
prior to e, and ν(e) is the earliest response in sb-order after e.
Thus, we obtain the following definition.
Definition 16 (hb-simulation). Suppose D = (D, sb, rf , mo) is an execution and S = (Γ, init , τ )
an operational sequential object. An hb-simulation is a relation ρ ⊆ 2D × (Γ × H) such that:
1. ρ(∅, (init , h i)), and
(initialisation)
2. for all Z ⊆ D, and events e ∈ D\Z such that Z ∪{e} is down-closed w.r.t D’s happens-before
order, if ρ(Z, (s, h)) then
(a) if e 6= lp(µ(e)) then ρ(Z ∪ {e}, (s, h)),
11
(stutter step)
(b) if e = lp(µ(e))
provided i = µ(e), h′ = h · h(i, r)i, and τ (s, h, i) = (s′ , h′ ), then
(linearization step)
i. ρ(Z ∪ {e}, (s′ , h′ )), and
ii. ν(e) = r, and
iii. for all operations (i′ , r′ ) in h, if (i′ , r′ ) ≺h′ (i, r) then (lp(i′ ), e) ∈ hb.
The initialisation is straightforward, while the two inductive steps consider a new e for inclusion in Z following hb order. If e is a stutter step, we only have to prove that ρ is preserved
by adding e to Z. If e is a linearization step (that is, if e = lp(µ(e))), then there are three
obligations: prove that ρ is preserved (2(b)i); prove that the response of the high-level operation
matches that returned by the sequential object (2(b)ii); and prove that whenever some operation
that has already been linearized is causally prior to the newly linearized operation, then that
operation’s linearization point is hb-prior to the new event e (2(b)iii).
Theorem 17 (Soundness of hb-simulation). If ρ is an hb-simulation for a C11 execution D,
then D is causally linearizable.
Proof. The proof below uses a formulation of an operational sequential object where τ that does
not maintain a history.
Fix the operational sequential object S = (Γ, init , τ ). Fix the execution D, and let ≤E be
any linear extension of D’s hb relation. Assume that lp is the linearization function and ρ is the
simulation relation.
We perform an induction on the indexes of ≤E . Let en be the nth event in ≤E order, so we
are indexing from 0. Let Zn be the set of events strictly below the nth index. Thus,
Zn = {em | m < n}
Note that Z0 = ∅ and Zn+1 = Zn ∪ {en }. We define a function rep : {n | n < | ≤E |} → Γ
recursively as follows:
rep(0) = init
(1)
rep(n + 1) = rep(n)
rep(n + 1) = π1 (τ (rep(n), µ(en ))
when lp(µ(en )) 6= en
when lp(µ(en )) = en
(2)
(3)
By induction, we have ρ(Zn , rep(n)) for all n < | ≤E |.
• Because ρ(Z0 , rep(0)) = ρ(∅, init ), Proposition 1 ensures that ρ(Z0 , rep(0)).
• Assume ρ(Zn , rep(n)) and lp(µ(en )) 6= en . Then ρ(Zn+1 , rep(n+1)) = ρ(Zn ∪{en }, rep(n)),
and thus Property 2a ensures that ρ(Zn+1 , rep(n + 1)).
• Assume ρ(Zn , rep(n)) and lp(µ(en )) = en .
Then ρ(Zn+1 , rep(n + 1)) = ρ(Zn ∪ {en }, π1 (τ (rep(n), µ(en ))), and thus Property 2(b)i
ensures that ρ(Zn+1 , rep(n + 1)).
We turn now to defining k, the legal sequence we need to witness causal linearizability of D.
k0 = hi
kn+1 = kn
rep(n + 1) = kn · h(µ(e), ν(e))i
12
when lp(µ(en )) 6= en
(4)
(5)
when lp(µ(en )) = en
(6)
It is easy to see that this is a legal history, and that (kn , rep(n)) is a move.
We need to show that ≤H ⊆ k . Consider a response r and invocation i such that (r, i) ∈ hb.
Ley i′ be the invocation of r, and let r′ be the response of i.. Because µ(lp(i)) = i, we have
{(lp(i′ ), r), (i, lp(i))} ∈ sb ⊆ hb, and thus (lp(i′ ), lp(i)) ∈ hb and so lp(i′ ) appears at an earlier
point in ≤E than lp(i), and therefore (i′ , r) k (i, r′ ), as required.
Finally, we must show that ≺k ⊆ D . This is a simple induction on the length of k, with the
hypothesis that, for all operations (i, r), (i′ , r′ ) in k, if (i, r) ≺k (i′ , r′ ) then (lp(i), lp(i′ ) ∈ hb. At
each step we apply Property 2(b)iii. Thus, for each existing operation (i, r) and new operation
(i′ , r′ ), we have (i, r) ≺k (i′ , r′ ) =⇒ (lp(i), lp(i′) ∈ hb immediately. On the other hand,
(i′ , r′ ) ≺k (i, r) is impossible, because (i′ , r′ ) k (i, r) is false.
This completes oour proof.
6.2
Case-study: the Treiber Stack
We now outline an hb-simulation relation ρ for the Treiber stack. We fix some arbitrary C11
execution D = (D, sb, rf , mo) that contains an instance of the Treiber stack. That is, the
invocations in D are the stack invocations, and the responses are the stack responses (as given
in Section 3). Furthermore, the low-level memory operations between these invocations and
responses are generated by executions of the operations of the Treiber stack (Algorithm 1).
The main component of our simulation relation guarantees correctness of the data representation, i.e., the sequence of values formed by following next pointers starting with &T op forms an
appropriate stack, and we focus on this aspect of the relation. As is typical with verifications of
shared-memory algorithms, there are various other properties that would need to be considered
in a full proof.
In a sequentially consistent setting, the data representation can easily be obtained from
the state (which maps locations to values). However, for C11 executions calculating the data
representation requires a bit more work. In what follows, we define various functions that depend
on a set Z of events, representing the current stage of the induction.
We define the latest write in Z to a location x as latestZ (x) = max(mo ⇂(Z ∩ Loc(x))) and
the current value of a location x in some set Z as cvalZ (x) = wval(latestZ (x)), which is the
value written by the last write to x in modification order. It is now straightforward to construct
the sequence of values corresponding to a location as stackOf Z (x) = v · stackOf Z (y), where
v = cvalZ (x.val) and y = cvalZ (x.nxt).
Now, assuming that (s, h) is a state of the operational sequential stack, our simulation requires:
stackOf Z (cvalZ (&T op)) = s
(7)
Further, we require that all modifications of &T op are totally ordered by hb:
∀m, m′ ∈ Z ∩ M od(&T op). (m, m′ ) ∈ hb ∨ (m′ , m) ∈ hb
(8)
to ensure that any new read considered by the induction sees the most recent version of &T op.
The linearization function lp for the Treiber stack is completely standard: each operation is
linearized at the unique update operation generated by the unique successful CAS at line 9 (for
pushes) or line 16 (for pops).
In what follows, we illustrate how to verify the proof obligations given in Definition 16, for
the case where the new event e is a linearization point. Let e be an update operation that is
generated by the CAS at line 9 of the push operation in Algorithm 1. The first step is to prove
that every modification of &T op in Z is happens-before the update event e. Formally,
∀m ∈ Z ∩ Mod ∩ Loc(&T op). (m, e) ∈ hb
13
(9)
(S.Push(1), ⊥)
(S’.Pop, empty)
(S.Push(1), ⊥)
(S’.Push(2), ⊥)
(S.Pop, empty)
(S’.Push, ⊥)
Figure 3: Read-only operations without
communication (not compositional)
(S’.Pop, empty)
(S.Pop, empty)
Figure 4: Read-only operations with communication (compositional)
Proving this formally is somewhat involved, but the essential reason is as follows. Note that
there is an acquiring read r to &T op executed at line 7 of e’s operation and sb-prior to e. r reads
from some releasing update u. Thus, by Property 8, and the fact the hb contains sb, e is happens
after u, and all prior updates. If there were some update u′ of &T op such that (u′ , e) ∈
/ hb, then
(u′ , u) ∈
/ hb so by Property 8, (u, u′ ) ∈ hb. But it can be shown in this case that the CAS that
generated e could not have succeeded, because u′ constitutes an update intervening between r
and e. Therefore, there can be no such u′ .
Property 9 makes it straightforward to verify that Condition 2(b)iii of Definition 16 is satisfed.
To see this, note that every linearization point of every operation is a modification of &T op.
Thus, if (i′ , r′ ) is some operation such that lp(i′ ) ∈ Z (so that this operation has already been
linearized) then (lp(i′ ), e) ∈ hb.
Using Property 9 it is easy to see that both Property 7 and Property 8 are preserved. We
show by contradiction that latestZ ′ (&T op) = e. Otherwise, we have (e, latestZ ′ (&T op)) ∈ mo.
/ hb, but latestZ ′ (&T op) is a modification operation, so this
Therefore (latestZ ′ (&T op), e) ∈
contradicts Property 9.
It follows from latestZ ′ (&T op) = e that stackOf (cvalZ ′ ) = stackOf (wval(e)). Given this, it
is straightforward to show that Property 7 is preserved. This step of the proof relies on certain
simple properties of push operations. Specifically, we need to show that the current value of the
val field of the node being added to the stack (formally, cvalZ ((wval(e)).nxt)) is the value passed
to the push operation; and that the current value of the nxt field (formally, cvalZ ((wval(e)).nxt))
is the current value of &T op when the successful CAS occurs. These properties can be proved
using the model of dynamic memory given in Section 5.
7
A synchronisation pitfall
We now describe an important observation regarding failure of compositionality of read-only
operations caused by weak memory effects. The issue can be explained using our abstract notion
of an execution structure, however, a solution to the problem is not naturally available in C11
with only release-acquire annotations.
Consider the Treiber Stack in Algorithm 1 that returns empty instead of spinning; namely
where the inner loop (lines 12-14) is replaced by code block “top :=A Top ; if top = null then
return empty”. Such an implementation could produce executions such as the one in Fig. 3
which, like the examples in Section 3, is not compositional. Recovering compositionality requires
one to introduce additional communication edges as shown in Fig. 4. In the C11 memory model,
these correspond to “from-read” anti-dependencies from a read to a write overwriting the value
read. However, release-acquire synchronisation is not adequate for promoting from-read order in
the memory to happens-before.
One fix would be to disallow read-only operations, e.g., by introducing a release-acquire CAS
operation on a special variable that always succeeds at the start of each operation. However, such
a fix is somewhat unnatural. Another would be to use C11’s SC annotations, which can induce
14
synchronisation across from-read edges. However, the precise meaning of these annotations is
still a topic of active research [22, 6].
8
Conclusion and related work
We have presented causal linearizability, a new correctness condition for objects implemented
in weak-memory models, that generalises linearizability and addresses the important problem of
compositionality. Our condition is not tied to a particular memory model, but can be readily applied to memory models, such as C11, that feature a happens-before relation. We have presented
a proof method for verifying causal linearizability. We emphasise that our proof method can be
applied directly to a standard axiomatic memory model. Unlike other recent proposals [11, 20],
we model C11’s relaxed accesses without needing to prohibit their problematic dependency cycles
(so called “load-buffering” cycles).
Although causal linearizability has been presented as a condition for concurrent objects, we
believe it is straightforward to extend this condition to cover, for example, transactional memory.
We intend to develop our approach into a framework in which the behaviour of programs that
mix transactional memory, concurrent objects and primitive weak-memory operations can be
precisely described in a compositional fashion.
Causal linearizability is closely related to causal hb-linearizability defined in [13], which is a
causal relaxation of linearizability that uses specifications strengthened with a happens-before
relation. The compositionality result there requires that either a specification is commuting or
that a client is unobstructive (does not introduce too much synchronisation). Our result is more
general as we place no such restriction on the object or the client. Others [9] define a correctness
condition, also called causal linearizabilty, that is only compositional when the client satisfies
certain constraints; in contrast, we achieve full decoupling. Furthermore, that condition is only
defined when the underlying memory model is given operationally, rather than axiomatically like
C11. Early attempts, targetting TSO architectures, used totally ordered histories but allowed
the response of an operation to be moved to a corresponding “flush” event [16, 7, 27, 14]. Others
have considered the effects of linearizability in the context of a client abstraction. This includes a
correctness condition for C11 that is strictly stronger than linearizability under SC [5]. Although
we have applied causal linearizability to C11, causal linearizability itself is more general as it can
be applied to any weak memory model with a happens-before relation. Causal consistency [2] is
a related condition, aimed at shared-memory and data-stores, which has no notion of real-time
order and is not compositional.
References
[1] Sarita V. Adve and Kourosh Gharachorloo. Shared memory consistency models: A tutorial.
IEEE Computer, 29(12):66–76, 1996.
[2] Mustaque Ahamad, Gil Neiger, James E. Burns, Prince Kohli, and Phillip W. Hutto. Causal
memory: definitions, implementation, and programming. Distributed Computing, 9(1):37–
49, Mar 1995.
[3] J. Alglave, L. Maranget, and M. Tautschnig. Herding cats: Modelling, simulation, testing,
and data mining for weak memory. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst., 36(2):7:1–7:74, 2014.
[4] M. Batty, S. Owens, S. Sarkar, P. Sewell, and T. Weber. Mathematizing C++ concurrency.
In Thomas Ball and Mooly Sagiv, editors, POPL, pages 55–66. ACM, 2011.
15
[5] Mark Batty, Mike Dodds, and Alexey Gotsman. Library abstraction for C/C++ concurrency. In Roberto Giacobazzi and Radhia Cousot, editors, POPL, pages 235–248. ACM,
2013.
[6] Mark Batty, Alastair F. Donaldson, and John Wickerson. Overhauling SC atomics in C11
and opencl. In POPL, pages 634–648. ACM, 2016.
[7] Sebastian Burckhardt, Alexey Gotsman, Madanlal Musuvathi, and Hongseok Yang. Concurrent library correctness on the TSO memory model. In Helmut Seidl, editor, ESOP,
volume 7211 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 87–107. Springer, 2012.
[8] S. Doherty, L. Groves, V. Luchangco, and M. Moir. Formal verification of a practical lockfree queue algorithm. In FORTE, volume 3235 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages
97–114. Springer, 2004.
[9] Simon Doherty and John Derrick. Linearizability and causality. In SEFM, volume 9763 of
Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 45–60. Springer, 2016.
[10] Marko Doko and Viktor Vafeiadis. A program logic for C11 memory fences. In VMCAI,
volume 9583 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 413–430. Springer, 2016.
[11] Marko Doko and Viktor Vafeiadis. Tackling real-life relaxed concurrency with FSL++. In
ESOP, pages 448–475, 2017.
[12] B. Dongol and J. Derrick. Verifying linearisability: A comparative survey. ACM Comput.
Surv., 48(2):19:1–19:43, 2015.
[13] B. Dongol, R. Jagadeesan, J. Riely, and A. Armstrong. On abstraction and compositionality
for weak-memory linearisability. In VMCAI, volume 10747 of Lecture Notes in Computer
Science, pages 183–204. Springer, 2018.
[14] Brijesh Dongol, John Derrick, and Graeme Smith. Reasoning algebraically about refinement
on TSO architectures. In ICTAC, volume 8687 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages
151–168. Springer, 2014.
[15] Ivana Filipovic, Peter W. O’Hearn, Noam Rinetzky, and Hongseok Yang. Abstraction for
concurrent objects. Theor. Comput. Sci., 411(51-52):4379–4398, 2010.
[16] Alexey Gotsman, Madanlal Musuvathi, and Hongseok Yang. Show no weakness: Sequentially consistent specifications of TSO libraries. In Marcos K. Aguilera, editor, DISC, volume
7611 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 31–45. Springer, 2012.
[17] Rachid Guerraoui and Michal Kapalka. On the correctness of transactional memory. In
Siddhartha Chatterjee and Michael L. Scott, editors, PPoPP, pages 175–184. ACM, 2008.
[18] M. Herlihy and J. M. Wing. Linearizability: A correctness condition for concurrent objects.
ACM TOPLAS, 12(3):463–492, 1990.
[19] Maurice Herlihy and Nir Shavit. The art of multiprocessor programming. Morgan Kaufmann,
2008.
[20] Jan-Oliver Kaiser, Hoang-Hai Dang, Derek Dreyer, Ori Lahav, and Viktor Vafeiadis. Strong
logic for weak memory: Reasoning about release-acquire consistency in iris. In ECOOP,
pages 17:1–17:29, 2017.
16
[21] Ori Lahav, Nick Giannarakis, and Viktor Vafeiadis. Taming release-acquire consistency. In
Rastislav Bodı́k and Rupak Majumdar, editors, POPL, pages 649–662. ACM, 2016.
[22] Ori Lahav, Viktor Vafeiadis, Jeehoon Kang, Chung-Kil Hur, and Derek Dreyer. Repairing
sequential consistency in C/C++11. In PLDI, pages 618–632. ACM, 2017.
[23] L. Lamport. On interprocess communication. part I: basic formalism. Distributed Computing, 1(2):77–85, 1986.
[24] Leslie Lamport. How to make a multiprocessor computer that correctly executes multiprocess programs. IEEE Trans. Computers, 28(9):690–691, 1979.
[25] J. Manson, W.Pugh, and S. V. Adve. The Java memory model. In POPL, pages 378–391.
ACM, 2005.
[26] Gerhard Schellhorn, John Derrick, and Heike Wehrheim. A sound and complete proof
technique for linearizability of concurrent data structures. ACM Trans. Comput. Log.,
15(4):31:1–31:37, 2014.
[27] Oleg Travkin and Heike Wehrheim. Handling TSO in mechanized linearizability proofs. In
Haifa Verification Conference, volume 8855 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages
132–147. Springer, 2014.
[28] R. K. Treiber. Systems programming: Coping with parallelism. Technical Report RJ 5118,
IBM Almaden Res. Ctr., 1986.
17
A
Potentially incomplete executions
A complication with concurrent executions is that they may contain incomplete operations (that
have been invoked, but have not yet returned). Since the effect of an incomplete operation may
be globally visible, they cannot simply be ignored. This phenomenon has been well studied and
arises in the definitions of linearizability [18] and opacity [17]. This section describes how we
cope with incomplete operations in the context of causal linearizability.
We define the completable extension of a sequential object S = (Σ, legal ) to be a triple
T = (S, I, C), where I is a set of allowable incomplete actions and C : I → 2Σ is a completion
function that maps each I to a set of possible completions for I.
Example 18. If S = (Σ, legal ) is a concurrent object the set of allowable incomplete operations
and completion function is defined by:
I = {i ∈ Inv | ∃k1 , k2 ∈ Σ∗ . ∃r. k1 (i, r)k2 ∈ legal}
C = λi. {(i, r) ∈ Σ}
For the Treiber stack in Algorithm 1, we have IS = {Push(n) | n ∈ N}∪{Pop}, and CS (Push(n)) =
{⊥} and CS (Pop) = N ∪ {empty}.
S A completable extension of an object family SX is a triple TX = (SX , IX , CX ), where IX =
x Ix and CX (a) = Cx (a), with x being the unique element of X such that a ∈ Σx .
We say that E = (E, , ) is a T-execution structure iff E ⊆ Σ∪I such that dom( )∩I = ∅,
i.e., no element of E may depend (in real-time order) on an element in I. Note that there may be
edges both in and out of elements in E ∩ I and
edges into E ∩ I. A T-execution structure
is causally atomic if we can replace all incomplete events by complete events in a way that is
allowed by the corresponding sequential object. This process is analagous to the extension of
incomplete histories to complete histories, as allowed by linearizability and opacity in the classical
(i.e., sequentially consistent) setting.
Definition 19 (Causal linearizability). Let S = (Σ, legal ) be a family of sequential objects and T
its completable extension. A T-execution structure E = (E, , ) is causally atomic w.r.t. S iff
there exists a causally atomic S-execution structure E′ = (E ′ , ′ , ′ ) and an (order-preserving)
isomorphism ϕ : E → E′ such that:
• for each event e = (g, p, i) ∈ E, where i ∈ I, we have ϕ(e) = (g, p, a) for some a ∈ C(i),
and
• for each event e = (g, p, a) ∈ E, where a ∈ Σ, we have ϕ(e) = (g, p, a).
Theorem 10 extends directly to the case of incomplete histories. The fact that each individual
object history is causally atomic implies that we can assume the existence of a valid extension
for each incomplete event, which is itself causally atomic. Thus, we can apply these per-object
extensions to the object-family execution, and show, using the proof of Theorem 10, that the
resulting complete execution structure is causally atomic.
18
| 6cs.PL
|
Self-Organization and Artificial Life: A Review
Carlos Gershenson1 , Vito Trianni2 , Justin Werfel3 and Hiroki Sayama4
1
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico
Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, Italian National Research Council, Rome, Italy
3
Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Enginering, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
4
Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY 13902, USA
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
arXiv:1804.01144v1 [nlin.AO] 3 Apr 2018
2
Abstract
Self-organization has been an important concept within a
number of disciplines, which Artificial Life (ALife) also has
heavily utilized since its inception. The term and its implications, however, are often confusing or misinterpreted. In
this work, we provide a mini-review of self-organization and
its relationship with ALife, aiming at initiating discussions
on this important topic with the interested audience. We first
articulate some fundamental aspects of self-organization, outline its usage, and review its applications to ALife within its
soft, hard, and wet domains. We also provide perspectives for
further research.
What is self-organization?
The term “self-organizing system” was coined by Ashby
(1947) to describe phenomena where local interactions between independent elements lead to global behaviors or patterns. The phrase is used when an external observer perceives a pattern in a system with many components, and this
pattern is not imposed by a central authority external to those
components, but rather arises from the collective behavior
of the elements themselves. Natural examples are found in
areas such as collective motion (Vicsek and Zafeiris, 2012),
as when birds or fish move in flocks or schools exhibiting
complex group behavior; morphogenesis (Doursat, 2011),
in which cells in a living body divide and specialize to
develop into a complex body plan; and pattern formation
(Cross and Hohenberg, 1993) in a variety of physical and
chemical systems, such as convection and crystal growth as
well as the formation of patterns like stripes and spots on
animal coats.
A formal definition of the term runs into difficulties in
agreeing on what is a system, what is organization, and
what is self (Gershenson and Heylighen, 2003), none of
which are perfectly straightforward. However, a pragmatic
approach focuses on when it is useful to describe a system as self-organizing (Gershenson, 2007). This utility
typically comes when an observer identifies a pattern at a
higher scale but is also interested in phenomena at a lower
scale; there then arise questions of how the lower scale produces the observables at the higher scale, as well as how
the higher scale constrains and promotes observables at the
lower scale. For example, bird behavior leads to flock formation, and descriptors at the level of the flock can also
be used to understand regulation of individual bird behavior (Keys and Dugatkin, 1990).
Self-organization has been an important concept within
a number of disciplines, such as statistical mechanics
(Wolfram, 1983; Crutchfield, 2012), supramolecular chemistry (Lehn, 2017), and computer science (Mamei et al.,
2006). Artificial Life (ALife) frequently draws heavily on
self-organizing systems in different contexts (Aguilar et al.,
2014), starting in the early days of the field with studies of
systems like snowflake formation (Packard, 1986) and agent
flocking (Reynolds, 1987), and continuing to the present
day. However, there are often confusion and misinterpretation involved with this concept, possibly due to an apparent lack of recent systematic literature. In this work, we
aim at providing a mini-review of self-organization within
the context of ALife, with a goal to open discussions on
this important topic to the interested audience within the
community. We first articulate some fundamental aspects
of self-organization, outline ways the term has been used by
researchers in the field, and then summarize work based on
self-organization within soft (simulated), hard (robotic), and
wet (chemical and biochemical) domains of ALife. We also
provide perspectives of further research.
Usage
Ashby coined the term “self-organizing system” to show that
a machine could be strictly deterministic and yet exhibit a
self-induced change of organization (Ashby, 1947). This notion was further developed within cybernetics (von Foerster,
1960; Ashby, 1962). In many contexts, a thermodynamical perspective has been taken, where “organization” is
viewed as the opposite of entropy (Nicolis and Prigogine,
1977). Since there is an equivalence between BoltzmannGibbs entropy and Shannon information, this notion has
also been applied in contexts related to information theory
(Fernández et al., 2014). In this view, a self-organizing system is one whose dynamics lead it to decrease its entropy
or increase its information content. In the meantime, there
are several other definitions of self-organization as well. For
example, Shalizi (2001) defines self-organization as an increase in statistical complexity, which in turn is defined as
the amount of information required to minimally specify the
state of the system’s causal architecture. As an alternative to
entropy, the use of the mean value of random variables has
also been proposed (Holzer and De Meer, 2011).
The recent subfield of guided self-organization explores mechanisms by which self-organization can be
regulated for specific purposes—that is, how to find
or design dynamics for a system such that it will
have particular attractors or outcomes (Prokopenko, 2009;
Ay et al., 2012; Polani et al., 2013; Prokopenko, 2014;
Prokopenko and Gershenson, 2014). Much of this research is based on information theory. For example, the
self-organization of random Boolean networks (Kauffman,
1969, 1993) can be guided to specific dynamical regimes
(Gershenson, 2012). The concept of self-organization
is also heavily used in organization science, with relevance to artificial society models (Gilbert and Conte, 1995;
Epstein and Axtell, 1996).
While there may be no single agreed-on definition of selforganization, this lack need not be an insurmountable obstacle for its study, any more than a lack of a unanimous formal
definition of “life” has been an obstacle for progress in the
fields of biology or ALife. In what follows, we provide a
concice review of how self-organization has contributed to
the progress of ALife.
Domains
One way to classify ALife research is to divide it into soft,
hard, and wet domains, roughly referring to computer simulations, physical robots, and chemical/biological research
(including living technology as the application of ALife
(Bedau et al., 2009)), respectively. Self-organization has
played a central role in work in all three domains.
Soft ALife
Soft ALife, or mathematical and computational modeling and simulation of life-like behaviors, has been linked
to self-organization in many sub-domains. Cellular automata (CAs) (Ilachinski, 2001), one of the most popular
modeling frameworks used in earlier forms of soft ALife,
are well-explored, illustrative examples of self-organizing
systems. A CA consists of many units (cells), each of
which can be in any of a number of discrete states, and
each of which repeatedly determines its next state in a
fully distributed manner, based on its current state and
those of its neighbors. With no central controller involved, CAs can spontaneously organize their state configurations to demonstrate various forms of self-organization:
dynamical critical states such as in sand-pile models
(Bak et al., 1988) and in the Game of Life (Bak et al., 1989),
spontaneous formation of spatial patterns (Young, 1984;
Wolfram, 1984; Ermentrout and Edelstein-Keshet, 1993),
self-replication 1 (Langton, 1984, 1986; Reggia et al., 1993;
Sipper, 1998), and evolution by variation and natural selection (Sayama, 1999, 2004; Salzberg and Sayama, 2004;
Suzuki and Ikegami, 2006; Oros and Nehaniv, 2007, 2009).
Similarly, partial differential equations (PDEs), a continuous counterpart of CAs, have an even longer history
of demonstrating self-organizing dynamics (Turing, 1952;
Glansdorff and Prigogine, 1971; Field and Noyes, 1974;
Pearson, 1993).
Another representative class of soft ALife that shows
self-organization comprises models of collective behavior of self-driven agents (Vicsek and Zafeiris, 2012).
Reynolds’ Boids model (Reynolds, 1987) is probably the
best known in this category. In this work, self-propelled
agents (“boids”) move in a continuous space according
to three kinetic rules: cohesion (to maintain positional
proximity), alignment (to maintain directional similarity),
and separation (to avoid overcrowding and collision).
A variety of related models have since been proposed
and studied, including simplified, statistical-physicsoriented ones (Vicsek et al., 1995; Levine et al., 2000;
Aldana et al., 2007; Newman and Sayama, 2008) and more
detailed, behavioral-ecology-oriented ones (Couzin et al.,
2002; Kunz and Hemelrijk, 2003; Hildenbrandt et al.,
2010).
These models produce natural-looking flocking/schooling/swarming collective behaviors out of simple
decentralized behavioral rules, and they also exhibit phase
transitions between distinct macroscopic states.
Such collective behavior models have been brought
to artificial chemistry studies (Dittrich et al., 2001;
Banzhaf and Yamamoto, 2015) as well, such as
swarm chemistry and its variants (Sayama, 2008;
Kreyssig and Dittrich, 2011; Sayama, 2011, 2012;
Erskine and Herrmann, 2015), in which kinetically and
chemically distinct species of idealized agents interact to
form nontrivial spatiotemporal dynamic patterns. More
recently, these collective behavior models have also been
actively utilized in morphogenetic engineering (Doursat,
2011; Doursat et al., 2012), in which researchers attempt
to achieve a successful merger of self-organization and
programmable architectural design, by discovering or designing agent rules that result in specific desired high-level
patterns.
Other examples of self-organization in soft ALife are
found in simulation models of artificial societies. Their
roots can be traced back to the famous segregation mod1
Note that earlier literature on self-reproducing cellular automata (von Neumann, 1966; Codd, 1968) is not included here,
because those models typically had a clear separation between a
central universal controller and a structure that is procedurally constructed by the controller; thus they may not constitute a good example of self-organization as discussed in this article.
els developed by Sakoda and Schelling back in the early
1970s (Sakoda, 1971; Schelling, 1971; Hegselmann, 2017),
in which simple, independent decision making by individual agents would eventually cause a spatially segregated
state of society at a macroscopic level. Agent-based simulation of artificial societies has been one of the core topics discussed in the ALife community (Epstein et al., 1996;
Lansing, 2002), and has elucidated self-organization of issues in social order such as geographical resource management (Lansing and Kremer, 1993; Bousquet and Page,
2004), cooperative strategies (Lindgren and Nordahl, 1993;
Brede, 2011; Adami et al., 2016; Ichinose and Sayama,
2017), and common languages (Steels, 1995; Kirby, 2002;
Smith et al., 2003; Lipowska and Lipowski, 2012). The
literature on self-organization of adaptive social network
structure (Gross and Sayama, 2009; Bryden et al., 2010;
Geard and Bullock, 2010) may also be included in this category.
Hard ALife
Robots can be considered to be life-like artifacts in their
ability to sense their physical environment and take action in response. Physical agents, even very simple ones,
can evoke in the observer a particularly strong sense of
being animate. From W. Grey Walter’s tortoises (Walter,
1950, 1951), to simple machines based on the principles
of Braitenberg’s vehicles (Braitenberg, 1986), to other reactive robots (Brooks, 1989), to recent biomimetic and
bioinspired designs (Saranli et al., 2001; Wood et al., 2013;
Kim and Wensing, 2017), building artificial life as physically embodied hardware allows it to exploit the rich dynamics underlying the interaction between itself and its environment, so that even simple mechanisms and behavioral
rules can confer sophisticated life-like attributes to limited
machines (Simon, 1969). Still higher complexity can be
attained either by increasing the sophistication of a single
robot, or by increasing the number of robots in a system that,
through the resulting interaction and self-organization, can
then evince more sophisticated abilities collectively, from
adaptive responses to group decision making.
Physical hardware has the strong advantage that the physical characteristics of the system (dynamics, sensor performance, actuator noise profiles, etc.) are by definition realistic, whereas simulations are necessarily simplified and
typically fail to capture phenomena that only become evident through material experimentation (Brooks and Matarić,
1993; Rubenstein et al., 2014). Conversely, while simulation can readily handle very large numbers of agents, hardware considerations (cost, space, scalability of operation,
etc.) have traditionally limited hard ALife studies to using a
small number of robots. In some scenarios, self-organizing
phenomena of interest do not necessarily require a large
number of robots; when the mechanism for coordination is
based on stigmergy (persistent information left in a shared
environment), the important element is a large number of
interactions between robot and environment, and even a single robot could suffice (Beckers et al., 2000; Werfel et al.,
2014). More recently, hardware advances have made it possible to conduct physical experiments with robots in numbers exceeding a thousand (Rubenstein et al., 2014).
Physical experiments have been used to explore selforganizing phenomena in a variety of areas. Aggregation of objects has been studied from a physics perspective (Giomi et al., 2013); in ways inspired by behavior observed in living systems, such as cockroaches or
bees (Garnier et al., 2008; Kernbach et al., 2009); and using controllers designed through automatic methods like
artificial evolution (Dorigo et al., 2004; Francesca et al.,
2014). Another topic is collective navigation, in which
groups of robots coordinate their overall direction of motion and collectively avoid obstacles (Baldassarre et al.,
2007; Trianni and Dorigo, 2006; Turgut et al., 2008). In
other collective decision-making processes, positive feedback from recruitment processes and negative feedback
from cross-inhibition contribute to shape the outcome
(Reina et al., 2018; Valentini et al., 2015; Scheidler et al.,
2016; Garnier et al., 2009, 2013; Kernbach et al., 2009;
Francesca et al., 2014; Valentini et al., 2017). Self-assembly
(Whitesides and Grzybowski, 2002) is another form of selforganization, with several examples in hard ALife of
self-assembling or self-reconfiguring robots (Murata et al.,
1994; Holland and Melhuish, 1999; Støy and Nagpal, 2004;
Zykov et al., 2005; Dorigo et al., 2006; Ampatzis et al.,
2009; Rubenstein et al., 2014).
Wet ALife
Wet ALife, or physico-chemical synthesis of life-like behaviors, extensively utilizes self-organization as its core principle. A classic example is the spatial pattern formation
in experimentally realized reaction-diffusion systems, such
as the Belousov-Zhabotinsky reaction (Vanag and Epstein,
2001; Adamatzky et al., 2008) and Gray-Scott-like selfreplicating spots (Lee et al., 1994), where dynamic patterns self-organize entirely from spatially localized chemical reactions. Similar approaches can also be taken by using microscopic biological organisms (e.g., slime molds)
as the media of self-organization (Adamatzky et al., 2008;
Adamatzky, 2015). In the origins of life research, molecular
self-assembly plays the essential role in producing protocell
structures and their metabolic dynamics (Rasmussen et al.,
2003; Hanczyc et al., 2003; Rasmussen et al., 2004, 2008).
More recently, dynamic behaviors of macroscopically visible chemical droplets, a.k.a. liquid robots (Čejková et al.,
2017), has become a focus of active research in ALife. In this line of research, interactions among chemical reactions, physical micro-fluid dynamics and possibly other not-yet-fully-understood microscopic mechanisms cause self-organization of spontaneous movements
(Hanczyc et al., 2007; Cejkova et al., 2014) and complex
morphology (Čejková et al., 2018) of those droplets. Moreover, droplet-based systems have also been used to demonstrate artificial evolution in experimental chemical systems
(Parrilla-Gutierrez et al., 2017).
Perspectives
As already mentioned above, we can understand a selforganizing system as one in which organization increases
in time. However, it can be shown that, depending on
how the variables of a system are chosen, the same system can be said to be either organizing or disorganizing
(Gershenson and Heylighen, 2003). Moreover, in several
examples of self-organization, it is not straightforward to
identify the self of the system, as oftentimes all elements
composing the system can be ascribed equal agency. Finally, in cybernetics and systems theory, the dependency
of the boundaries of a system on the observer has thoroughly been discussed (Gershenson et al., 2014): one wants
to have an objective description of phenomena, but descriptions are necessarily made by observers, making them partially subjective. It becomes clear, then, that discussing selforganization requires the identification of what is self and
what is other, and what are the elements that are increasing
in their organization. Similar issues have been tackled by
Maturana and Varela (1980) in the definition of living systems as autopoietic systems. According to this tradition, a
living system is inherently self-organising because the self
is continuously produced or renewed by processes brought
forth by the system’s internal components. In other words,
an autopoietic system can be recognized as a unity with
boundaries that encompass a number of simpler/elementary
components that are at the basis of the organization of the
system, as they are responsible for the definition of the system boundaries and for the (re)production of the very same
components (Varela et al., 1974). This is a peculiar characteristic of living systems. If life is deeply rooted in selforganization, so should be ALife, and the several acceptations of ALife discussed above demonstrate the richness of
the links it holds with self-organization.
Looking at the perspectives of ALife, it can be useful to
think of self-organization as the common language that unifies the soft, hard and wet domains. The ALife community
can progress owing to shared concepts and definitions, and
despite the mentioned difficulties, self-organization stands
as a common ground on which to build shared consensus.
Most importantly, we believe that the identification and classifications of the mechanisms that underpin self-organization
can be extremely useful to synthesize novel forms of ALife
and gain a better understanding of life itself. These mechanisms should be identified at the level of the system components and characterized for the effects they have on the
system organization. Mechanisms pertain to the modalities of interaction among system components (e.g., colli-
sions, perceptions, direct communication, stigmergy), to behavioural patterns pertaining to individual components (e.g.,
exploration vs. exploitation), and to information enhancement or suppression (e.g., recruitment or inhibitory processes). The effects of the mechanisms should be visible
in the creation of feedback loops—positive or negative—
at the system level, which determine the complex dynamics underlying self-organization. We believe that, by identifying and characterising the mechanisms that support selforganization, the synthesis of artifacts with life-like properties would be much simplified. In this perspective, mechanisms underlying self-organization can be thought of as
design patterns to generate artificial lives (Babaoglu et al.,
2006; Fernandez-Marquez et al., 2013; Reina et al., 2014).
By exploiting and composing them, different forms of ALife could be designed with a principled approach, owing to
the understanding of the relationship between mechanisms
and system organization.
The possibility of exploiting self-organization for design purposes is especially relevant toward the development of living technologies, that is, technologies presenting features of living systems (Bedau et al., 2009),
such as robustness, adaptability, and self-organization,
which can include self-reconfiguration, self-healing, selfmanagement, self-assembly, etc., often named together as
“self-*” in the context of autonomic computing (Poslad,
2009). Self-organization has been used directly in living technologies within a variety of domains (Bedau et al.,
2013), from protocells (Rasmussen et al., 2008) to cities
(Gershenson, 2013), and also several methodologies that
use self-organization have been proposed in engineering
(Frei and Di Marzo Serugendo, 2011). A major leap forward can be expected when principled design methodologies are laid down, and a better understanding of selforganization for ALife can be at the forefront of the development of such methods.
As a final discussion, and as food for thought, it is also
worth considering when self-organization is not useful in
the context of ALife. Tracing a clear line across the domain is of course impossible, but our reasoning above provides some suggestions. Indeed, self-organization does not
account for every life-like process, for instance when there is
no clear increase in organization. For instance, hard ALife
has strongly developed the concept of embodied cognition
and morphological computation (Pfeifer and Gómez, 2009),
where the dynamics of mind-body-environment interaction
are fundamental aspects. These dynamics, albeit very complex, are not easily described within the framework of
self-organization. Evolution is also very much represented
within ALife, but typical generational evolutionary algorithms do not present clear elements of self-organization,
as the progression in organization through generations is
mediated by a central authority that defines selection of
the fittest individuals. Open-ended evolution (Taylor et al.,
2016) makes a difference when such a centralized authority does not exist and progress is observable in mixing populations of interacting individuals. Exploring possibilities
of infusing self-organization into those processes that were
traditionally not oriented toward self-organization would be
potentially a very fruitful direction of research.
Needless to say, this mini-review we presented here is
not meant to be a complete, comprehensive review of selforganization and ALife, given the limitation of space. We
plan to expand the work substantially in the near future to
develop a more thorough review for publication elsewhere.
References
Adamatzky, A. (2015). A would-be nervous system made from a
slime mold. Artificial life, 21(1):73–91.
Adamatzky, A., de Lacy Costello, B., and Shirakawa, T. (2008).
Universal computation with limited resources: Belousov–
zhabotinsky and physarum computers. International Journal
of Bifurcation and Chaos, 18(08):2373–2389.
Banzhaf, W. and Yamamoto, L. (2015). Artificial Chemistries. MIT
Press.
Beckers, R., Holland, O. E., and Deneubourg, J.-L. (2000). Prerational Intelligence: Adaptive Behavior and Intelligent Systems Without Symbols and Logic, Volume 2, chapter From
Local Actions to Global Tasks: Stigmergy and Collective
Robotics. Springer, Dordrecht.
Bedau, M. A., McCaskill, J. S., Packard, N. H., Parke, E. C., and
Rasmussen, S. R. (2013). Introduction to recent developments in living technology. Artificial Life, 19(3):291–298.
Bedau, M. A., McCaskill, J. S., Packard, N. H., and Rasmussen,
S. (2009). Living technology: Exploiting life’s principles in
technology. Artificial Life, 16(1):89–97.
Bousquet, F. and Page, C. L. (2004). Multi-agent simulations and
ecosystem management: a review. Ecological Modelling,
176(3–4):313 – 332.
Braitenberg, V. (1986). Vehicles: Experiments in synthetic psychology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Adami, C., Schossau, J., and Hintze, A. (2016). Evolutionary game
theory using agent-based methods. Phys. Life Rev., 19:1–26.
Brede, M. (2011). The evolution of cooperation on correlated payoff landscapes. Artificial Life, 17(4):365–373.
Aguilar, W., Santamarı́a Bonfil, G., Froese, T., and Gershenson, C.
(2014). The past, present, and future of artificial life. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 1(8).
Brooks, R. A. (1989). A robot that walks; emergent behaviors from
a carefully evolved network. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.
Aldana, M., Dossetti, V., Huepe, C., Kenkre, V. M., and Larralde,
H. (2007). Phase transitions in systems of self-propelled
agents and related network models. Physical Review Letters,
98:095702.
Brooks, R. A. and Matarić, M. J. (1993). Robot Learning, chapter Real Robots, Real Learning Problems, pages 193–213.
Kluwer Academic Press.
Ampatzis, C., Tuci, E., Trianni, V., Christensen, A., and Dorigo, M.
(2009). Evolving self-assembly in autonomous homogeneous
robots: experiments with two physical robots. Artificial Life.
Ashby, W. R. (1947). Principles of the self-organizing dynamic
system. Journal of General Psychology, 37:125–128.
Bryden, J., Funk, S., Geard, N., Bullock, S., and Jansen, V. A. A.
(2010). Stability in flux: community structure in dynamic
networks. J. Roy. Soc. Interface, 8(60):1031–1040.
Čejková, J., Banno, T., Hanczyc, M. M., and Štěpánek, F. (2017).
Droplets as liquid robots. Artificial Life, 23(4):528–549.
Ashby, W. R. (1962). Principles of the self-organizing system. In
Foerster, H. V. and Zopf, Jr., G. W., editors, Principles of
Self-Organization, pages 255–278, Oxford. Pergamon.
Čejková, J., Hanczyc, M. M., and Štěpánek, F. (2018). Multiarmed droplets as shape-changing protocells. Artificial Life,
24(1):71–79.
Ay, N., Der, R., and Prokopenko, M. (2012). Guided selforganization: perception–action loops of embodied systems.
Theory in Biosciences, 131(3):125–127.
Cejkova, J., Novak, M., Stepanek, F., and Hanczyc, M. M. (2014).
Dynamics of chemotactic droplets in salt concentration gradients. Langmuir, 30(40):11937–11944.
Babaoglu, O., Canright, G., Deutsch, A., Di Caro, G. A., Ducatelle,
F., Gambardella, L. M., Ganguly, N., Jelasity, M. . r., Montemanni, R., Montresor, A., and Urnes, T. (2006). Design
patterns from biology for distributed computing. ACM Transactions on Autonomous Adaptive Systems, 1(1):26–66.
Codd, E. F. (1968).
Cellular Automata, chapter A SelfReproducing Universal Computer-Constructor, pages 81–
105. Academic Press, Inc.
Bak, P., Chen, K., and Kreutz, M. (1989). Self-organized criticality
in the “game of life”. Nature, 342:780–782.
Bak, P., Tang, C., and Wiesenfeld, K. (1988). Self-organized criticality. Physical Review A, 38:364.
Baldassarre, G., Trianni, V., Bonani, M., Mondada, F., Dorigo, M.,
and Nolfi, S. (2007). Self-organized coordinated motion in
groups of physically connected robots. IEEE Trans. Syst.
Man Cybern. B Cybern., 37:224–239.
Couzin, I. D., Krause, J., James, R., Ruxton, G. D., and Franks,
N. R. (2002). Collective memory and spatial sorting in animal
groups. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 218(1):1–11.
Cross, M. C. and Hohenberg, P. C. (1993). Pattern formation outside of equilibrium. Rev. Mod. Phys., 65:851–1112.
Crutchfield, J. P. (2012). Between order and chaos. Nature Physics,
8:17–24.
Dittrich, P., Ziegler, J., and Banzhaf, W. (2001). Artificial
chemistries—a review. Artificial Life, 7(3):225–275.
Dorigo, M., Trianni, V., Şahin, E., Groß, R., Labella, T. H.,
Baldassarre, G., Nolfi, S., Deneubourg, J.-L., Mondada, F.,
Floreano, D., and Gambardella, L. (2004). Evolving selforganizing behaviors for a swarm-bot. Autonomous Robots,
17(2-3):223–245.
Dorigo, M., Tuci, E., Trianni, V., Groß, R., Nouyan, S., Ampatzis,
C., Labella, T. H., O’Grady, R., Bonani, M., and Mondada,
F. (2006). Computational Intelligence: Principles and Practice, chapter SWARM-BOT: Design and implementation of
colonies of self-assembling robots. IEEE Computational Intelligence Society.
Doursat, R. (2011). The myriads of alife: Importing complex systems and self-organization into engineering. In 2011 IEEE
Symposium on Artificial Life.
Doursat, R., Sayama, H., and Michel, O., editors (2012). Morphogenetic Engineering: Toward Programmable Complex Systems. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Epstein, J., Axtell, R., and Project, . (1996). Growing Artificial
Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up. A Bradford
book. Brookings Institution Press.
Epstein, J. M. and Axtell, R. L. (1996). Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up. Brookings Institution Press MIT Press.
Ermentrout, G. B. and Edelstein-Keshet, L. (1993). Cellular automata approaches to biological modeling. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 160(1):97–133.
Erskine, A. and Herrmann, J. M. (2015). Cell-division behavior in
a heterogeneous swarm environment. Artif. Life, 4(481–500).
Fernández, N., Maldonado, C., and Gershenson, C. (2014).
Information measures of complexity, emergence, selforganization, homeostasis, and autopoiesis. In Prokopenko,
M., ed., Guided Self-Organization: Inception, pages 19–51.
Fernandez-Marquez, J. L., Di Marzo Serugendo, G., Montagna, S.,
Viroli, M., and Arcos, J. L. (2013). Description and composition of bio-inspired design patterns: a complete overview.
Natural Computing, 12(1):43–67.
Field, R. J. and Noyes, R. M. (1974). Oscillations in chemical systems. IV. Limit cycle behavior in a model of a real chemical
reaction. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 60(5).
Francesca, G., Brambilla, M., Brutschy, A., Trianni, V., and Birattari, M. (2014). Automode: A novel approach to the automatic design of control software for robot swarms. Swarm
Intelligence, 8(2):89–112.
Frei, R. and Di Marzo Serugendo, G. (2011). Advances in complexity engineering. Int. J. of Bio-Inspired Computation,
3(4):199–212.
Garnier, S., Combe, M., Jost, C., and Theraulaz, G. (2013). Do
ants need to estimate the geometrical properties of trail bifurcations to find an efficient route? a swarm robotics test bed.
PLOS Computational Biology, 9:e1002903.
Garnier, S., Gautrais, J., Asadpour, M., Jost, C., and Theraulaz, G.
(2009). Self-organized aggregation triggers collective decision making in a group of cockroach-like robots. Adaptive
Behavior, 17(2):109–133.
Garnier, S., Jost, C., Gautrais, J., Asadpour, M., Caprari, G., Jeanson, R., Grimal, A., and Theraulaz, G. (2008). The embodiment of cockroach aggregation behavior in a group of microrobots. Artificial Life, 14(4):387–408.
Geard, N. and Bullock, S. (2010). Competition and the dynamics of
group affiliation. Advances in Complex Systems, 13(4):501.
Gershenson, C. (2007).
Design and Control of Selforganizing Systems.
CopIt Arxives,
Mexico.
http://tinyurl.com/DCSOS2007.
Gershenson, C. (2012). Guiding the self-organization of random
Boolean networks. Theory in Biosciences, 131(3):181–191.
Gershenson, C. (2013). Living in living cities. Artificial Life, 19(3
& 4):401–420.
Gershenson, C., Csermely, P., Erdi, P., Knyazeva, H., and Laszlo,
A. (2014). The past, present and future of cybernetics and
systems research. systema: connecting matter, life, culture
and technology, 1(3):4–13.
Gershenson, C. and Heylighen, F. (2003). When can we call a
system self-organizing? In ECAL 2003, pages 606–614.
Gilbert, N. and Conte, R., editors (1995). Artificial Societies: the
computer simulation of social life. Taylor & Francis, Inc.,
Bristol, PA, USA.
Giomi, L., Hawley-Weld, N., and Mahadevan, L. (2013). Swarming, swirling and stasis in sequestered bristle-bots. Proc. R.
Soc. A, 469(2151).
Glansdorff, P. and Prigogine, I. (1971). Thermodynamic Theory
of Structure, Stability and Fluctuations. Wiley-Interscience,
New York.
Gross, T. and Sayama, H., editors (2009). Adaptive networks: Theory, Models and Applications. Understanding Complex Systems. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg.
Hanczyc, M. M., Fujikawa, S. M., and Szostak, J. W. (2003). Experimental models of primitive cellular compartments: encapsulation, growth, and division. Science, 302:618–622.
Hanczyc, M. M., Toyota, T., Ikegami, T., Packard, N., and Sugawara, T. (2007). Fatty acid chemistry at the oil- water interface: self-propelled oil droplets. Journal of the American
Chemical Society, 129(30):9386–9391.
Hegselmann, R. (2017). Thomas C. Schelling and James M.
Sakoda: The intellectual, technical, and social history of a
model. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul., 20(3):15.
Hildenbrandt, H., Carere, C., and Hemelrijk, C. (2010). Selforganized aerial displays of thousands of starlings: a model.
Behavioral Ecology, 21(6):1349–1359.
Holland, O. and Melhuish, C. (1999). Stigmergy, self-organization,
and sorting in collective robotics. Artificial Life, 5:173–202.
Holzer, R. and De Meer, H. (2011). Methods for approximations of
quantitative measures in self-organizing systems. In Bettstetter, C. and Gershenson, C., editors, Self-Organizing Systems,
LCNS volume 6557, pages 1–15.
Ichinose, G. and Sayama, H. (2017). Invasion of cooperation in
scale-free networks: Accumulated versus average payoffs.
Artificial Life, 23(1):25–33.
Maturana, H. and Varela, F. (1980). Autopoiesis and Cognition:
the Realization of the Living. D. Reidel Publishing Co.,
Dordecht, 2nd edition.
Ilachinski, A. (2001). Cellular Automata: A Discrete Universe.
World Scientific.
Murata, S., Kurokawa, H., and Kokaji, S. (1994). Self-assembling
machine. In Proc. ICRA 1994.
Kauffman, S. A. (1969). Metabolic stability and epigenesis in randomly constructed genetic nets. J. Theor. Biol., 22:437–467.
Newman, J. P. and Sayama, H. (2008). Effect of sensory blind
zones on milling behavior in a dynamic self-propelled particle model. Physical Review E, 78:011913.
Kauffman, S. A. (1993). The Origins of Order. Oxford University
Press, Oxford, UK.
Kernbach, S., Thenius, R., Kernbach, O., and Schmickl, T. (2009).
Re-embodiment of honeybee aggregation behavior in an artificial micro-robotic system. Adapt. Behav., 17(3):237–259.
Keys, G. C. and Dugatkin, L. A. (1990). Flock size and position
effects on vigilance, aggression, and prey capture in the european starling. The Condor, 92:151–159.
Kim, S. and Wensing, P. M. (2017). Foundations and Trends
in Robotics, volume 5, chapter Design of Dynamic Legged
Robots, pages 117–190. Now Publishers Inc.
Kirby, S. (2002). Natural language from artificial life. Artifical
Life, 8(2):185 – 215.
Kreyssig, P. and Dittrich, P. (2011). Reaction flow artificial
chemistries. In ECAL, pages 431–437.
Kunz, H. and Hemelrijk, C. K. (2003). Artificial fish schools: Collective effects of school size, body size, and body form. Artificial Life, 9(3):237–253.
Langton, C. G. (1984). Self-reproduction in cellular automata.
Physica D, 10:135–144.
Langton, C. G. (1986). Studying artificial life with cellular automata. Physica D, 22(1–3):129–149.
Lansing, J. S. (2002). “artificial societies” and the social sciences.
Artificial Life, 8(3):279–292.
Lansing, J. S. and Kremer, J. N. (1993). Emergent properties of
balinese water temple networks: Coadaptation on a rugged
fitness landscape. American Anthropologist, 95(1):97–114.
Nicolis, G. and Prigogine, I. (1977). Self-Organization in NonEquilibrium Systems: From Dissipative Structures to Order
Through Fluctuations. Wiley, Chichester.
Oros, N. and Nehaniv, C. L. (2007). Sexyloop: Self-reproduction,
evolution and sex in cellular automata. In 2007 IEEE Symposium on Artificial Life.
Oros, N. and Nehaniv, C. L. (2009). Dude, where is my sex
gene?—persistence of sex over evolutionary time in cellular
automata. In 2009 IEEE Symposium on Artificial Life.
Packard, N. (1986). Lattice models for solidification and aggregation. In Theory and Application of Cellular Automata, Wolfram S. (ed.), pages 305–310. World Scientific, Institute for
Advanced Study Preprint. Reprinted (1986).
Parrilla-Gutierrez, J. M., Tsuda, S., Grizou, J., Taylor, J., Henson,
A., and Cronin, L. (2017). Adaptive artificial evolution of
droplet protocells in a 3d-printed fluidic chemorobotic platform with configurable environments. Nature Communications, 8(1):1144.
Pearson, J. E. (1993). Complex patterns in a simple system. Science, 261(5118):189–192.
Pfeifer, R. and Gómez, G. (2009). Morphological Computation
– Connecting Brain, Body, and Environment. In Creating
Brain-Like Intelligence, pages 66–83. Springer, Berlin.
Polani, D., Prokopenko, M., and Yaeger, L. S. (2013). Information and self-organization of behavior. Advances in Complex
Systems, 16(2&3):1303001.
Poslad, S. (2009). Autonomous Systems and Artificial Life, chapter 10, pages 317–341. Wiley-Blackwell.
Lee, K.-J., McCormick, W. D., Pearson, J. E., and Swinney, H. L.
(1994). Experimental observation of self-replicating spots in
a reaction–diffusion system. Nature, 369(6477):215.
Prokopenko, M. (2009). Guided self-organization. HFSP Journal,
3(5):287–289.
Lehn, J.-M. (2017). Supramolecular chemistry: Where from?
where to? Chem. Soc. Rev., 46:2378–2379.
Prokopenko, M., editor (2014). Guided Self-Organization: Inception, volume 9 of Emergence, Complexity and Computation.
Springer, Berlin Heidelberg.
Levine, H., Rappel, W.-J., and Cohen, I. (2000). Self-organization
in systems of self-propelled particles. Physical Review E,
63:017101.
Prokopenko, M. and Gershenson, C. (2014). Entropy methods in
guided self-organisation. Entropy, 16(10):5232–5241.
Lindgren, K. and Nordahl, M. G. (1993). Cooperation and community structure in artificial ecosystems. Artificial Life,
1(1 2):15–37.
Lipowska, D. and Lipowski, A. (2012). Naming game on adaptive
weighted networks. Artificial Life, 18(3):311–323.
Mamei, M., Menezes, R., Tolksdorf, R., and Zambonelli, F. (2006).
Case studies for self-organization in computer science. Journal of Systems Architecture, 52(8-9):443–460.
Rasmussen, S., Bedau, M. A., Chen, L., Deamer, D., Krakauer,
D. C., Packard, N. H., and Stadler, P. F., editors (2008). Protocells: Bridging Nonliving and Living Matter Bridging Nonliving and Living Matter. MIT Press.
Rasmussen, S., Chen, L., Deamer, D., Krakauer, D. C., Packard,
N. H., Stadler, P. F., and Bedau, M. A. (2004). Transitions
from nonliving to living matter. Science, 303(5660):963–965.
Rasmussen, S., Chen, L., Nilsson, M., and Abe, S. (2003). Bridging nonliving and living matter. Artificial life, 9(3):269–316.
Reggia, J. A., Armentrout, S. L., Chou, H.-H., and Peng, Y. (1993).
Simple systems that exhibit self-directed replication. Science,
259(5099):1282–1287.
Reina, A., Bose, T., Trianni, V., and Marshall, J. A. R. (2018). Effects of spatiality on value-sensitive decisions made by robot
swarms. In DARS 2016, pages 461–473.
Reina, A., Dorigo, M., and Trianni, V. (2014). Towards a Cognitive
Design Pattern for Collective Decision-Making. In ANTS’14,
pages 194–205.
Reynolds, C. W. (1987). Flocks, herds, and schools: A distributed
behavioral model. Computer Graphics, 21(4):25–34.
Rubenstein, M., Cornejo, A., and Nagpal, R. (2014). Programmable self-assembly in a thousand-robot swarm. Science, 345(6198):795–799.
Sakoda, J. M. (1971). The checkerboard model of social interaction. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1(1):119–132.
Salzberg, C. and Sayama, H. (2004). Complex genetic evolution
of artificial selfreplicators in cellular automata. Complexity,
10(2):33–39.
Støy, K. and Nagpal, R. (2004). Self-reconfiguration using directed
growth. In Proc. DARS 2004, Toulouse, France.
Suzuki, K. and Ikegami, T. (2006). Spatial-pattern-induced evolution of a self-replicating loop network. Artificial Life,
12(4):461–485.
Taylor, T., et al. (2016). Open-ended evolution: perspectives from
the OEE workshop in York. Artificial Life, 22(3):408–423.
Trianni, V. and Dorigo, M. (2006). Self-organisation and communication in groups of simulated and physical robots. Biological
Cybernetics, 95(3):213–231.
Turgut, A. E., Çelikkanat, H., Gökçe, F., and Şahin, E. (2008).
Self-organized flocking in mobile robot swarms. Swarm Intelligence, 2(2–4):97–120.
Turing, A. (1952). The chemical basis of morphogenesis. Phil.
Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. B, 237(641):37–72.
Valentini, G., Ferrante, E., and Dorigo, M. (2017). The best-of-n
problem in robot swarms: Formalization, state of the art, and
novel perspectives. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 4(9).
Saranli, U., Buehler, M., and Koditschek, D. E. (2001). RHex:
A simple and highly mobile robot. International Journal of
Robotics Research, 20(7):616–631.
Valentini, G., Ferrante, E., Hamann, H., and Dorigo, M. (2015).
Collective decision with 100 kilobots: speed versus accuracy
in binary discrimination problems. In Autonomous Agents
and Multi-Agent Systems, pages 553–580.
Sayama, H. (1999).
A new structurally dissolvable selfreproducing loop evolving in a simple cellular automata
space. Artificial Life, 5(4):343–365.
Vanag, V. K. and Epstein, I. R. (2001). Pattern formation in a
tunable medium: The Belousov-Zhabotinsky reaction in an
aerosol OT microemulsion. Phys. Rev. Lett., 87(22):228301.
Sayama, H. (2004). Self-protection and diversity in self-replicating
cellular automata. Artificial Life, 10(1):83–98.
Varela, F. J., Maturana, H. R., and Uribe, R. (1974). Autopoiesis:
The organization of living systems, its characterization and a
model. Biosystems, 5(4):187–196.
Sayama, H. (2008). Swarm chemistry. Artif. Life, 15(1):105–114.
Sayama, H. (2011). Seeking open-ended evolution in swarm chemistry. In 2011 IEEE Symposium on Artificial Life.
Vicsek, T., Czirók, A., Ben-Jacob, E., Cohen, I., and Shochet, O.
(1995). Novel type of phase transition in a system of selfdriven particles. Physical Review Letters, 75:1226.
Sayama, H. (2012). Morphologies of self-organizing swarms in 3d
swarm chemistry. In Proc. GECCO 2012, pages 577–584.
Vicsek, T. and Zafeiris, A. (2012). Collective motion. Physics
Reports, 517:71–140.
Scheidler, A., Brutschy, A., Ferrante, E., and Dorigo, M. (2016).
The k-unanimity rule for self-organized decision-making
in swarms of robots. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics,
46(5):1175–1188.
von Foerster, H. (1960). On self-organizing systems and their environments. In Yovitts, M. C. and Cameron, S., editors, SelfOrganizing Systems, pages 31–50, New York. Pergamon.
Schelling, T. C. (1971). Dynamic models of segregation. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1(2):143–186.
von Neumann, J. (1966). The Theory of Self-Reproducing Automata. University of Illinois Press, Champaign. Edited by
A. W. Burks.
Shalizi, C. R. (2001). Causal Architecture, Complexity and SelfOrganization in Time Series and Cellular Automata. PhD
thesis, University of Wisconsin at Madison.
Walter, W. G. (1950). An imitation of life. Sci. Am., 182:42–45.
Simon, H. A. (1969). The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT Press,
Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Werfel, J., Petersen, K., and Nagpal, R. (2014). Designing collective behavior in a termite-inspired robot construction team.
Science, 343(6172):754–758.
Sipper, M. (1998). Fifty years of research on self-replication: An
overview. Artificial Life, 4(3):237–257.
Smith, K., Kirby, S., and Brighton, H. (2003). Iterated learning:
A framework for the emergence of language. Artificial Life,
9(4):371–386.
Steels, L. (1995). A self-organizing spatial vocabulary. Artificial
Life, 2(3):319–332.
Walter, W. G. (1951). A machine that learns. Sci. Am., 185:60–63.
Whitesides, G. M. and Grzybowski, B. (2002). Self-assembly at
all scales. Science, 295(5564):2418–2421.
Wolfram, S. (1983). Statistical mechanics of cellular automata.
Reviews of Modern Physics, 55(3):601–644.
Wolfram, S. (1984). Cellular automata as models of complexity.
Nature, 311:419–424.
Wood, R., Nagpal, R., and Wei, G.-Y. (2013).
robobees. Scientific American.
Flight of the
Young, D. A. (1984). A local activator-inhibitor model of vertebrate skin patterns. Mathematical Biosciences, 72(1):51–58.
Zykov, V., Mytilinaios, E., Adams, B., and Lipson, H. (2005).
Robotics: self-reproducing machines. Nature, 435:163–164.
| 9cs.NE
|
Quo Vadis, Action Recognition? A New Model and the Kinetics Dataset
arXiv:1705.07750v3 [cs.CV] 12 Feb 2018
†
João Carreira†
Andrew Zisserman†,∗
[email protected]
[email protected]
DeepMind
∗
Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford
Abstract
The paucity of videos in current action classification
datasets (UCF-101 and HMDB-51) has made it difficult
to identify good video architectures, as most methods obtain similar performance on existing small-scale benchmarks. This paper re-evaluates state-of-the-art architectures in light of the new Kinetics Human Action Video
dataset. Kinetics has two orders of magnitude more data,
with 400 human action classes and over 400 clips per
class, and is collected from realistic, challenging YouTube
videos. We provide an analysis on how current architectures
fare on the task of action classification on this dataset and
how much performance improves on the smaller benchmark
datasets after pre-training on Kinetics.
We also introduce a new Two-Stream Inflated 3D ConvNet (I3D) that is based on 2D ConvNet inflation: filters and pooling kernels of very deep image classification ConvNets are expanded into 3D, making it possible
to learn seamless spatio-temporal feature extractors from
video while leveraging successful ImageNet architecture
designs and even their parameters. We show that, after
pre-training on Kinetics, I3D models considerably improve
upon the state-of-the-art in action classification, reaching
80.9% on HMDB-51 and 98.0% on UCF-101.
Figure 1. A still from ‘Quo Vadis’ (1951). Where is this going?
Are these actors about to kiss each other, or have they just done
so? More importantly, where is action recognition going? Actions
can be ambiguous in individual frames, but the limitations of existing action recognition datasets has meant that the best-performing
video architectures do not depart significantly from single-image
analysis, where they rely on powerful image classifiers trained on
ImageNet. In this paper we demonstrate that video models are
best pre-trained on videos and report significant improvements by
using spatio-temporal classifiers pre-trained on Kinetics, a freshly
collected, large, challenging human action video dataset.
1. Introduction
mentation, depth prediction, pose estimation, action classification.
In the video domain, it is an open question whether training an action classification network on a sufficiently large
dataset, will give a similar boost in performance when applied to a different temporal task or dataset. The challenges of building video datasets has meant that most popular benchmarks for action recognition are small, having on
the order of 10k videos.
In this paper we aim to provide an answer to this question
using the new Kinetics Human Action Video Dataset [16],
which is two orders of magnitude larger than previous
datasets, HMDB-51 [18] and UCF-101 [29]. Kinetics has
One of the unexpected benefits of the ImageNet challenge has been the discovery that deep architectures trained
on the 1000 images of 1000 categories, can be used for other
tasks and in other domains. One of the early examples of
this was using the fc7 features from a network trained on
ImageNet for the PASCAL VOC classification and detection challenge [10, 23]. Furthermore, improvements in the
deep architecture, changing from AlexNet to VGG-16, immediately fed through to commensurate improvements in
the PASCAL VOC performance [25]. Since then, there have
been numerous examples of ImageNet trained architectures
warm starting or sufficing entirely for other tasks, e.g. seg1
400 human action classes with more than 400 examples for
each class, each from a unique YouTube video.
Our experimental strategy is to reimplement a number of
representative neural network architectures from the literature, and then analyze their transfer behavior by first pretraining each one on Kinetics and then fine-tuning each on
HMDB-51 and UCF-101. The results suggest that there is
always a boost in performance by pre-training, but the extent of the boost varies significantly with the type of architecture. Based on these findings, we introduce a new model
that has the capacity to take advantage of pre-training on
Kinetics, and can achieves a high performance. The model
termed a “Two-Stream Inflated 3D ConvNets” (I3D), builds
upon state-of-the-art image classification architectures, but
inflates their filters and pooling kernels (and optionally their
parameters) into 3D, leading to very deep, naturally spatiotemporal classifiers. An I3D model based on Inceptionv1 [13] obtains performance far exceeding the state-of-theart, after pre-training on Kinetics.
In our model comparisons, we did not consider more
classic approaches such as bag-of-visual-words representations [6, 19, 22, 33]. However, the Kinetics dataset is publicly available, so others can use it for such comparisons.
The next section outlines the set of implemented action
classification models. Section 3 gives an overview of the
Kinetics dataset. Section 4 reports the performance of models on previous benchmarks and on Kinetics, and section 5
studies how well the features learned on Kinetics transfer to
different datasets. The paper concludes with a discussion of
the results.
2. Action Classification Architectures
While the development of image representation architectures has matured quickly in recent years, there is still no
clear front running architecture for video. Some of the major differences in current video architectures are whether the
convolutional and layers operators use 2D (image-based) or
3D (video-based) kernels; whether the input to the network
is just an RGB video or it also includes pre-computed optical flow; and, in the case of 2D ConvNets, how information
is propagated across frames, which can be done either using temporally-recurrent layers such as LSTMs, or feature
aggregation over time.
In this paper we compare and study a subset of models
that span most of this space. Among 2D ConvNet methods, we consider ConvNets with LSTMs on top [5, 37], and
two-stream networks with two different types of stream fusion [8, 27]. We also consider a 3D ConvNet [14, 30]: C3D
[31].
As the main technical contribution, we introduce TwoStream Inflated 3D ConvNets (I3D). Due to the highdimensionality of their parameterization and the lack of labeled video data, previous 3D ConvNets have been rela-
tively shallow (up to 8 layers). Here we make the observation that very deep image classification networks, such
as Inception [13], VGG-16 [28] and ResNet [12], can be
trivially inflated into spatio-temporal feature extractors, and
that their pre-trained weights provide a valuable initialization. We also find that a two-stream configuration is still
useful.
A graphical overview of the five types of architectures
we evaluate is shown in figure 2 and the specification of
their temporal interfaces is given in table 1.
Many of these models (all but C3D) have an Imagenet
pre-trained model as a subcomponent. Our experimental strategy assumes a common ImageNet pre-trained image classification architecture as back bone, and for this
we chose Inception-v1 with batch normalization [13], and
morph it in different ways. The expectation is that with this
back bone in common, we will be able to tease apart those
changes that benefit action classification the most.
2.1. The Old I: ConvNet+LSTM
The high performance of image classification networks
makes it appealing to try to reuse them with as minimal
change as possible for video. This can be achieved by using
them to extract features independently from each frame then
pooling their predictions across the whole video [15]. This
is in the spirit of bag of words image modeling approaches
[19, 22, 33]; but while convenient in practice, it has the issue
of entirely ignoring temporal structure (e.g. models can’t
potentially distinguish opening from closing a door).
In theory, a more satisfying approach is to add a recurrent layer to the model [5, 37], such as an LSTM, which can
encode state, and capture temporal ordering and long range
dependencies. We position an LSTM layer with batch normalization (as proposed by Cooijmans et al. [4]) after the
last average pooling layer of Inception-V1, with 512 hidden units. A fully connected layer is added on top for the
classifier.
The model is trained using cross-entropy losses on the
outputs at all time steps. During testing we consider only
the output on the last frame. Input video frames are subsampled by keeping one out of every 5, from an original 25
frames-per-second stream. The full temporal footprint of all
models is given in table 1.
2.2. The Old II: 3D ConvNets
3D ConvNets seem like a natural approach to video modeling, and are just like standard convolutional networks, but
with spatio-temporal filters. They have been explored several times, previously [14, 30, 31, 32]. They have a very important characteristic: they directly create hierarchical representations of spatio-temporal data. One issue with these
models is that they have many more parameters than 2D
ConvNets because of the additional kernel dimension, and
Figure 2. Video architectures considered in this paper. K stands for the total number of frames in a video, whereas N stands for a subset of
neighboring frames of the video.
this makes them harder to train. Also, they seem to preclude
the benefits of ImageNet pre-training, and consequently
previous work has defined relatively shallow custom architectures and trained them from scratch [14, 15, 30, 31]. Results on benchmarks have shown promise but have not been
competitive with state-of-the-art, making this type of models a good candidate for evaluation on our larger dataset.
For this paper we implemented a small variation of C3D
[31], which has 8 convolutional layers, 5 pooling layers and
2 fully connected layers at the top. The inputs to the model
are short 16-frame clips with 112 × 112-pixel crops as in
the original implementation. Differently from [31] we used
batch normalization after all convolutional and fully connected layers. Another difference to the original model is
in the first pooling layer, we use a temporal stride of 2 instead of 1, which reduces the memory footprint and allows
for bigger batches – this was important for batch normalization (especially after the fully connected layers, where
there is no weight tying). Using this stride we were able to
train with 15 videos per batch per GPU using standard K40
GPUs.
2.3. The Old III: Two-Stream Networks
LSTMs on features from the last layers of ConvNets can
model high-level variation, but may not be able to capture
fine low-level motion which is critical in many cases. It is
also expensive to train as it requires unrolling the network
through multiple frames for backpropagation-through-time.
A different, very practical approach, introduced by Simonyan and Zisserman [27], models short temporal snapshots of videos by averaging the predictions from a single
RGB frame and a stack of 10 externally computed optical
flow frames, after passing them through two replicas of an
ImageNet pre-trained ConvNet. The flow stream has an
adapted input convolutional layer with twice as many input
channels as flow frames (because flow has two channels,
horizontal and vertical), and at test time multiple snapshots
are sampled from the video and the action prediction is averaged. This was shown to get very high performance on
existing benchmarks, while being very efficient to train and
test.
A recent extension [8] fuses the spatial and flow streams
after the last network convolutional layer, showing some
improvement on HMDB while requiring less test time augmentation (snapshot sampling). Our implementation follows this paper approximately using Inception-V1. The inputs to the network are 5 consecutive RGB frames sampled 10 frames apart, as well as the corresponding optical
flow snippets. The spatial and motion features before the
last average pooling layer of Inception-V1 (5 × 7 × 7 feature grids, corresponding to time, x and y dimensions) are
passed through a 3 × 3 × 3 3D convolutional layer with 512
output channels, followed by a 3 × 3 × 3 3D max-pooling
layer and through a final fully connected layer. The weights
of these new layers are initialized with Gaussian noise.
Both models, the original two-stream and the 3D fused
version, are trained end-to-end (including the two-stream
averaging process in the original model).
2.4. The New: Two-Stream Inflated 3D ConvNets
With this architecture, we show how 3D ConvNets can
benefit from ImageNet 2D ConvNet designs and, optionally, from their learned parameters. We also adopt a twostream configuration here – it will be shown in section 4
that while 3D ConvNets can directly learn about temporal
patterns from an RGB stream, their performance can still be
greatly improved by including an optical-flow stream.
Inflating 2D ConvNets into 3D. A number of very successful image classification architectures have been developed
over the years, in part through painstaking trial and error.
Instead of repeating the process for spatio-temporal models
we propose to simply convert successful image (2D) classification models into 3D ConvNets. This can be done by
starting with a 2D architecture, and inflating all the filters
and pooling kernels – endowing them with an additional
temporal dimension. Filters are typically square and we just
make them cubic – N × N filters become N × N × N .
Bootstrapping 3D filters from 2D Filters. Besides the architecture, one may also want to bootstrap parameters from
the pre-trained ImageNet models. To do this, we observe
that an image can be converted into a (boring) video by
copying it repeatedly into a video sequence. The 3D models
can then be implicitly pre-trained on ImageNet, by satisfying what we call the boring-video fixed point: the pooled
activations on a boring video should be the same as on the
original single-image input. This can be achieved, thanks to
linearity, by repeating the weights of the 2D filters N times
along the time dimension, and rescaling them by dividing
by N . This ensures that the convolutional filter response
is the same. Since the outputs of convolutional layers for
boring videos are constant in time, the outputs of pointwise
non-linearity layers and average and max-pooling layers are
the same as for the 2D case, and hence the overall network
response respects the boring-video fixed point. [21] studies
other bootstrapping strategies.
Pacing receptive field growth in space, time and network depth. The boring video fixed-point leaves ample
freedom on how to inflate pooling operators along the time
dimension and on how to set convolutional/pooling temporal stride – these are the primary factors that shape the size
of feature receptive fields. Virtually all image models treat
the two spatial dimensions (horizontal and vertical) equally
– pooling kernels and strides are the same. This is quite
natural and means that features deeper in the networks are
equally affected by image locations increasingly far away
in both dimensions. A symmetric receptive field is however
not necessarily optimal when also considering time – this
should depend on frame rate and image dimensions. If it
grows too quickly in time relative to space, it may conflate
edges from different objects breaking early feature detection, while if it grows too slowly, it may not capture scene
dynamics well.
In Inception-v1, the first convolutional layer has stride 2,
then there are four max-pooling layers with stride 2 and a
7 × 7 average-pooling layer preceding the last linear clas-
sification layer, besides the max-pooling layers in parallel
Inception branches. In our experiments the input videos
were processed at 25 frames per second; we found it helpful to not perform temporal pooling in the first two maxpooling layers (by using 1 × 3 × 3 kernels and stride 1
in time), while having symmetric kernels and strides in all
other max-pooling layers. The final average pooling layer
uses a 2 × 7 × 7 kernel. The overall architecture is shown in
fig. 3. We train the model using 64-frame snippets and test
using the whole videos, averaging predictions temporally.
Two 3D Streams. While a 3D ConvNet should be able to
learn motion features from RGB inputs directly, it still performs pure feedforward computation, whereas optical flow
algorithms are in some sense recurrent (e.g. they perform iterative optimization for the flow fields). Perhaps because of
this lack of recurrence, experimentally we still found it valuable to have a two-stream configuration – shown in fig. 2,
e) – with one I3D network trained on RGB inputs, and another on flow inputs which carry optimized, smooth flow
information. We trained the two networks separately and
averaged their predictions at test time.
2.5. Implementation Details
All models but the C3D-like 3D ConvNet use ImageNetpretrained Inception-V1 [13] as base network. For all architectures we follow each convolutional layer by a batch
normalization [13] layer and a ReLU activation function,
except for the last convolutional layers which produce the
class scores for each network.
Training on videos used standard SGD with momentum set to 0.9 in all cases, with synchronous parallelization across 32 GPUs for all models except the 3D ConvNets
which receive a large number of input frames and hence
require more GPUs to form large batches – we used 64
GPUs for these. We trained models on on Kinetics for 110k
steps, with a 10x reduction of learning rate when validation
loss saturated. We tuned the learning rate hyperparameter
on the validation set of Kinetics. Models were trained for
up to 5k steps on UCF-101 and HMDB-51 using a similar
learning rate adaptation procedure as for Kinetics but using
just 16 GPUs. All the models were implemented in TensorFlow [1].
Data augmentation is known to be of crucial importance
for the performance of deep architectures. During training we used random cropping both spatially – resizing the
smaller video side to 256 pixels, then randomly cropping a
224 × 224 patch – and temporally, when picking the starting frame among those early enough to guarantee a desired
number of frames. For shorter videos, we looped the video
as many times as necessary to satisfy each model’s input
interface. We also applied random left-right flipping consistently for each video during training. During test time
Figure 3. The Inflated Inception-V1 architecture (left) and its detailed inception submodule (right). The strides of convolution and pooling
operators are 1 where not specified, and batch normalization layers, ReLu’s and the softmax at the end are not shown. The theoretical
sizes of receptive field sizes for a few layers in the network are provided in the format “time,x,y” – the units are frames and pixels. The
predictions are obtained convolutionally in time and averaged.
Method
ConvNet+LSTM
3D-ConvNet
Two-Stream
3D-Fused
Two-Stream I3D
#Params
9M
79M
12M
39M
25M
Training
# Input Frames Temporal Footprint
25 rgb
5s
16 rgb
0.64s
1 rgb, 10 flow
0.4s
5 rgb, 50 flow
2s
64 rgb, 64 flow
2.56s
Testing
# Input Frames
Temporal Footprint
50 rgb
10s
240 rgb
9.6s
25 rgb, 250 flow
10s
25 rgb, 250 flow
10s
250 rgb, 250 flow
10s
Table 1. Number of parameters and temporal input sizes of the models.
the models are applied convolutionally over the whole video
taking 224 × 224 center crops, and the predictions are averaged. We briefly tried spatially-convolutional testing on
the 256 × 256 videos, but did not observe improvement.
Better performance could be obtained by also considering
left-right flipped videos at test time and by adding additional augmentation, such as photometric, during training.
We leave this to future work.
We computed optical flow with a TV-L1 algorithm [38].
tions require more emphasis on the object to distinguish, for
example playing different types of wind instruments.
The dataset has 400 human action classes, with 400 or
more clips for each class, each from a unique video, for a
total of 240k training videos. The clips last around 10s, and
there are no untrimmed videos. The test set consists of 100
clips for each class. A full description of the dataset and
how it was built is given in [16].
4. Experimental Comparison of Architectures
3. The Kinetics Human Action Video Dataset
The Kinetics dataset is focused on human actions (rather
than activities or events). The list of action classes covers:
Person Actions (singular), e.g. drawing, drinking, laughing, punching; Person-Person Actions, e.g. hugging, kissing, shaking hands; and, Person-Object Actions, e.g. opening presents, mowing lawn, washing dishes. Some actions
are fine grained and require temporal reasoning to distinguish, for example different types of swimming. Other ac-
In this section we compare the performance of the five architectures described in section 2 whilst varying the dataset
used for training and testing.
Table 2 shows the classification accuracy when training
and testing on either UCF-101, HMDB-51 or Kinetics. We
test on the split 1 test sets of UCF-101 and HMDB-51 and
on the held-out test set of Kinetics. There are several noteworthy observations. First, our new I3D models do best in
all datasets, with either RGB, flow, or RGB+flow modali-
Architecture
(a) LSTM
(b) 3D-ConvNet
(c) Two-Stream
(d) 3D-Fused
(e) Two-Stream I3D
RGB
81.0
51.6
83.6
83.2
84.5
UCF-101
Flow RGB + Flow
–
–
–
–
85.6
91.2
85.8
89.3
90.6
93.4
RGB
36.0
24.3
43.2
49.2
49.8
HMDB-51
Flow RGB + Flow
–
–
–
–
56.3
58.3
55.5
56.8
61.9
66.4
RGB
63.3
56.1
62.2
–
71.1
Kinetics
Flow RGB + Flow
–
–
–
–
52.4
65.6
–
67.2
63.4
74.2
Table 2. Architecture comparison: (left) training and testing on split 1 of UCF-101; (middle) training and testing on split 1 of HMDB-51;
(right) training and testing on Kinetics. All models are based on ImageNet pre-trained Inception-v1, except 3D-ConvNet, a C3D-like [31]
model which has a custom architecture and was trained here from scratch. Note that the Two-Stream architecture numbers on individual
RGB and Flow streams can be interpreted as a simple baseline which applies a ConvNet independently on 25 uniformly sampled frames
then averages the predictions.
Architecture
(a) LSTM
(b) 3D-ConvNet
(c) Two-Stream
(d) 3D-Fused
(e) Two-Stream I3D
RGB
53.9
56.1
57.9
–
68.4 (88.0)
Kinetics
Flow
–
–
49.6
–
61.5 (83.4)
RGB + Flow
–
–
62.8
62.7
71.6 (90.0)
ImageNet then Kinetics
RGB
Flow
RGB + Flow
63.3
–
–
–
–
–
62.2
52.4
65.6
–
–
67.2
71.1 (89.3) 63.4 (84.9)
74.2 (91.3)
Table 3. Performance training and testing on Kinetics with and without ImageNet pretraining. Numbers in brackets () are the Top-5
accuracy, all others are Top-1.
ties. This is interesting, given its very large number of parameters and that UCF-101 and HMDB-51 are so small, and
shows that the benefits of ImageNet pre-training can extend
to 3D ConvNets.
Second, the performance of all models is far lower on Kinetics than on UCF-101, an indication of the different levels
of difficulty of the two datasets. It is however higher than on
HMDB-51; this may be in part due to lack of training data
in HMDB-51 but also because this dataset was purposefully
built to be hard: many clips have different actions in the exact same scene (e.g. “drawing sword” examples are taken
from same videos as “sword” and “sword exercise”). Third,
the ranking of the different architectures is mostly consistent.
Additionally, two-stream architectures exhibit superior
performance on all datasets, but the relative value of RGB
and flow differs significantly between Kinetics and the other
datasets. The contribution from flow alone, is slightly
higher than that of RGB on UCF-101, much higher on
HMDB-51, and substantially lower on Kinetics. Visual inspection of the datasets suggests that Kinetics has much
more camera motion which may make the job of the motion
stream harder. The I3D model seems able to get more out
of the flow stream than the other models, however, which
can probably be explained by its much longer temporal receptive field (64 frames vs 10 during training) and more
integrated temporal feature extraction machinery. While it
seems plausible that the RGB stream has more discriminative information – we often struggled with our own eyes to
discern actions from flow alone in Kinetics, and this was
rarely the case from RGB – there may be opportunities for
future research on integrating some form of motion stabilization into these architectures.
We also evaluated the value of training models in Kinetics starting from ImageNet-pretrained weights versus from
scratch – the results are shown in table 3. It can be seen
that ImageNet pre-training still helps in all cases and this is
slightly more noticeable for the RGB streams, as would be
expected.
5. Experimental Evaluation of Features
In this section we investigate the generalizability of
the networks trained on Kinetics. We consider two
measures of this: first, we freeze the network weights
and use the network to produce features for the (unseen) videos of the UCF-101/HMDB-51 datasets. We
then train multi-way soft-max classifiers for the classes of
UCF-101/HMDB-51 (using their training data), and evaluate on their test sets; Second, we fine-tune each network for the UCF-101/HMDB-51 classes (using the UCF101/HMDB-51 training data), and again evaluate on the
UCF-101/HMDB-51 test sets.
We also examine how important it is to pre-train on ImageNet+Kinetics instead of just Kinetics.
Figure 4. All 64 conv1 filters of each Inflated 3D ConvNet after training on Kinetics (the filter dimensions are 7 × 7 × 7, and the 7
time dimensions are shown left-to-right across the figure). The sequence on top shows the flow network filters, the one in the middle
shows filters from the RGB I3D network, and the bottom row shows the original Inception-v1 filters. Note that the I3D filters possess rich
temporal structure. Curiously the filters of the flow network are closer to the original ImageNet-trained Inception-v1 filters, while the filters
in the RGB I3D network are no longer recognizable. Best seen on the computer, in colour and zoomed in.
The results are given in table 4. The clear outcome is that
all architectures benefit from pre-training on the additional
video data of Kinetics, but some benefit significantly more
than the others – notably the I3D-ConvNet and 3D-ConvNet
(although the latter starting from a much lower base). Training just the last layers of the models after pretraining in Kinetics (Fixed) also leads to much better performance than
directly training on UCF-101 and HMDB-51 for I3D models.
One explanation for the significant better transferability
of features of I3D models is their high temporal resolution
– they are trained on 64-frame video snippets at 25 frames
per second and process all video frames at test time, which
makes it possible for them to capture fine-grained temporal structure of actions. Stated differently, methods with
sparser video inputs may benefit less from training on this
large video dataset because, from their perspective, videos
do not differ as much from the images in ImageNet. The
difference over the C3D-like model can be explained by our
I3D models being much deeper, while having much fewer
parameters, by leveraging an ImageNet warm-start, by being trained on 4× longer videos, and by operating on 2×
higher spatial resolution videos.
The performance of the two-stream models is surpris-
ingly good even when trained from scratch (without ImageNet or Kinetics), mainly due to the accuracy of the flow
stream, which seems much less prone to overfitting (not
shown). Kinetics pretraining helps significantly more than
ImageNet.
5.1. Comparison with the State-of-the-Art
We show a comparison of the performance of I3D models and previous state-of-the-art methods in table 5, on
UCF-101 and HMDB-51. We include results when pretraining on the Kinetics dataset (with and without ImageNet
pre-training). The conv1 filters of the trained models are
shown in fig. 4.
Many methods get similar results, but the best performing method on these datasets is currently the one by Feichtenhofer and colleagues [7], which uses ResNet-50 models on RGB and optical flow streams, and gets 94.6% on
UCF-101 and 70.3% on HMDB-51 when combined with
the dense trajectories model [33]. We benchmarked our
methods using the mean accuracy over the three standard
train/test splits. Either of our RGB-I3D or RGB-Flow models alone, when pre-trained on Kinetics, outperforms all previous published performance by any model or model combinations. Our combined two-stream architecture widens
Architecture
(a) LSTM
(b) 3D-ConvNet
(c) Two-Stream
(d) 3D-Fused
(e) Two-Stream I3D
Original
81.0 / 54.2
– / 51.6
91.2 / 83.6
89.3 / 69.5
93.4 / 88.8
UCF-101
Fixed
88.1 / 82.6
– / 76.0
93.9 / 93.3
94.3 / 89.8
97.7 / 97.4
Full-FT
91.0 / 86.8
– / 79.9
94.2 / 93.8
94.2 / 91.5
98.0 / 97.6
Original
36.0 / 18.3
– / 24.3
58.3 / 47.1
56.8 / 37.3
66.4 / 62.2
HMDB-51
Fixed
50.8 / 47.1
– / 47.0
66.6 / 65.9
69.9 / 64.6
79.7 / 78.6
Full-FT
53.4 / 49.7
– / 49.4
66.6 / 64.3
71.0 / 66.5
81.2 / 81.3
Table 4. Performance on the UCF-101 and HMDB-51 test sets (split 1 of both) for architectures starting with / without ImageNet pretrained
weights. Original: train on UCF-101 or HMDB-51; Fixed: features from Kinetics, with the last layer trained on UCF-101 or HMDB-51;
Full-FT: Kinetics pre-training with end-to-end fine-tuning on UCF-101 or HMDB-51.
Model
Two-Stream [27]
IDT [33]
Dynamic Image Networks + IDT [2]
TDD + IDT [34]
Two-Stream Fusion + IDT [8]
Temporal Segment Networks [35]
ST-ResNet + IDT [7]
Deep Networks [15], Sports 1M pre-training
C3D one network [31], Sports 1M pre-training
C3D ensemble [31], Sports 1M pre-training
C3D ensemble + IDT [31], Sports 1M pre-training
RGB-I3D, Imagenet+Kinetics pre-training
Flow-I3D, Imagenet+Kinetics pre-training
Two-Stream I3D, Imagenet+Kinetics pre-training
RGB-I3D, Kinetics pre-training
Flow-I3D, Kinetics pre-training
Two-Stream I3D, Kinetics pre-training
UCF-101
88.0
86.4
89.1
91.5
93.5
94.2
94.6
65.2
82.3
85.2
90.1
95.6
96.7
98.0
95.1
96.5
97.8
HMDB-51
59.4
61.7
65.2
65.9
69.2
69.4
70.3
74.8
77.1
80.7
74.3
77.3
80.9
Table 5. Comparison with state-of-the-art on the UCF-101 and HMDB-51 datasets, averaged over three splits. First set of rows contains
results of models trained without labeled external data.
the advantage over previous models considerably, bringing overall performance to 98.0 on UCF-101 and 80.9 on
HMDB-51, which correspond to 63% and 35% misclassification reductions, respectively compared to the best previous model [7].
The difference between Kinetics pre-trained I3D models and prior 3D ConvNets (C3D) is even larger, although
C3D is trained on more videos, 1M examples from Sports1M plus an internal dataset, and even when ensembled and
combined with IDT. This may be explainable by the better
quality of Kinetics but also because of I3D simply being a
better architecture.
6. Discussion
We return to the question posed in the introduction, “is
there a benefit in transfer learning from videos?”. It is evident that there is a considerable benefit in pre-training on
(the large video dataset) Kinetics, just as there has been
such benefits in pre-training ConvNets on ImageNet for so
many tasks. This demonstrates transfer learning from one
dataset (Kinetics) to another dataset (UCF-101/HMDB-51)
for a similar task (albeit for different action classes). However, it still remains to be seen if there is a benefit in using
Kinetics pre-training for other video tasks such as semantic video segmentation, video object detection, or optical
flow computation. We plan to make publicly available I3D
models trained on the official Kinetics dataset’s release to
facilitate research in this area.
Of course, we did not perform a comprehensive exploration of architectures – for example we have not employed
action tubes [11, 17] or attention mechanisms [20] to focus in on the human actors. Recent works have proposed
imaginative methods for determining the spatial and temporal extent (detection) of actors within the two-stream
architectures, by incorporating linked object detections in
time [24, 26]. The relationship between space and time is a
mysterious one. Several very creative papers have recently
gone out of the box in attempts to capture this relationship,
for example by learning frame ranking functions for action
classes and using these as a representation [9], by making
analogies between actions and transformations [36], or by
creating 2D visual snapshots of frame sequences [2] – this
idea is related to the classic motion history work of [3]. It
would be of great value to also include these models in our
comparison but we could not, due to lack of time and space.
Acknowledgements:
We would like to thank everyone on the Kinetics project
and in particular Brian Zhang and Tim Green for help setting up the data for our experiments, and Karen Simonyan
for helpful discussions.
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
References
[1] M. Abadi, A. Agarwal, P. Barham, E. Brevdo, Z. Chen,
C. Citro, G. S. Corrado, A. Davis, J. Dean, M. Devin,
et al. Tensorflow: Large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous distributed systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.04467,
2016.
[2] H. Bilen, B. Fernando, E. Gavves, A. Vedaldi, and S. Gould.
Dynamic image networks for action recognition. In IEEE
International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern
Recognition CVPR, 2016.
[3] A. F. Bobick and J. W. Davis. The recognition of human
movement using temporal templates. IEEE Transactions on
pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 23(3):257–267,
2001.
[4] T. Cooijmans, N. Ballas, C. Laurent, and A. Courville.
Recurrent batch normalization.
arXiv preprint
arXiv:1603.09025, 2016.
[5] J. Donahue, L. Anne Hendricks, S. Guadarrama,
M. Rohrbach, S. Venugopalan, K. Saenko, and T. Darrell. Long-term recurrent convolutional networks for visual
recognition and description. In Proceedings of the IEEE
Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition,
pages 2625–2634, 2015.
[6] A. Fathi and G. Mori. Action recognition by learning midlevel motion features. In Computer Vision and Pattern
Recognition, 2008. CVPR 2008. IEEE Conference on, pages
1–8. IEEE, 2008.
[7] C. Feichtenhofer, A. Pinz, and R. P. Wildes. Spatiotemporal residual networks for video action recognition. arXiv
preprint arXiv:1611.02155, 2016.
[8] C. Feichtenhofer, A. Pinz, and A. Zisserman. Convolutional
two-stream network fusion for video action recognition. In
IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition CVPR, 2016.
[9] B. Fernando, E. Gavves, J. M. Oramas, A. Ghodrati, and
T. Tuytelaars. Modeling video evolution for action recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer
Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 5378–5387, 2015.
[10] R. Girshick, J. Donahue, T. Darrell, and J. Malik. Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
[26]
segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on
computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 580–587,
2014.
G. Gkioxari and J. Malik. Finding action tubes. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern
Recognition, pages 759–768, 2015.
K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Computer Vision and Pattern
Recognition (CVPR), 2016 IEEE Conference on, 2016.
S. Ioffe and C. Szegedy. Batch normalization: Accelerating
deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift.
arXiv preprint arXiv:1502.03167, 2015.
S. Ji, W. Xu, M. Yang, and K. Yu. 3d convolutional neural
networks for human action recognition. IEEE transactions
on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 35(1):221–
231, 2013.
A. Karpathy, G. Toderici, S. Shetty, T. Leung, R. Sukthankar,
and L. Fei-Fei. Large-scale video classification with convolutional neural networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages
1725–1732, 2014.
W. Kay, J. Carreira, K. Simonyan, B. Zhang, C. Hillier,
S. Vijayanarasimhan, F. Viola, T. Green, T. Back, P. Natsev,
M. Suleyman, and A. Zisserman. The kinetics human action
video dataset. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.06950, 2017.
A. Kläser, M. Marszalek, C. Schmid, and A. Zisserman. Human focused action localization in video. In International
Workshop on Sign, Gesture, Activity, ECCV 2010, 2010.
H. Kuehne, H. Jhuang, E. Garrote, T. Poggio, and T. Serre.
HMDB: a large video database for human motion recognition. In Proceedings of the International Conference on
Computer Vision (ICCV), 2011.
I. Laptev, M. Marszalek, C. Schmid, and B. Rozenfeld.
Learning realistic human actions from movies. In Computer
Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2008. CVPR 2008. IEEE
Conference on, pages 1–8. IEEE, 2008.
Z. Li, E. Gavves, M. Jain, and C. G. Snoek. VideoLSTM
convolves, attends and flows for action recognition. arXiv
preprint arXiv:1607.01794, 2016.
E. Mansimov, N. Srivastava, and R. Salakhutdinov. Initialization strategies of spatio-temporal convolutional neural
networks. CoRR, abs/1503.07274, 2015.
J. C. Niebles, H. Wang, and L. Fei-Fei. Unsupervised learning of human action categories using spatial-temporal words.
International journal of computer vision, 79(3):299–318,
2008.
M. Oquab, L. Bottou, I. Laptev, and J. Sivic. Learning and
transferring mid-level image representations using convolutional neural networks. 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer
Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 1717–1724, 2014.
X. Peng and C. Schmid. Multi-region two-stream R-CNN
for action detection. In European Conference on Computer
Vision, pages 744–759. Springer, 2016.
S. Ren, K. He, R. Girshick, and J. Sun. Faster r-cnn: Towards
real-time object detection with region proposal networks. In
Advances in neural information processing systems, pages
91–99, 2015.
S. Saha, G. Singh, M. Sapienza, P. H. Torr, and F. Cuzzolin.
Deep learning for detecting multiple space-time action tubes
[27]
[28]
[29]
[30]
[31]
[32]
[33]
[34]
[35]
[36]
[37]
[38]
in videos. British Machine Vision Conference (BMVC) 2016,
2016.
K. Simonyan and A. Zisserman. Two-stream convolutional
networks for action recognition in videos. In Advances
in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 568–576,
2014.
K. Simonyan and A. Zisserman. Very deep convolutional
networks for large-scale image recognition. In ICLR, 2015.
K. Soomro, A. R. Zamir, and M. Shah. UCF101: A dataset
of 101 human actions classes from videos in the wild. arXiv
preprint arXiv:1212.0402, 2012.
G. W. Taylor, R. Fergus, Y. LeCun, and C. Bregler. Convolutional learning of spatio-temporal features. In European conference on computer vision, pages 140–153. Springer, 2010.
D. Tran, L. Bourdev, R. Fergus, L. Torresani, and M. Paluri.
Learning spatiotemporal features with 3d convolutional networks. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer
Vision (ICCV), pages 4489–4497. IEEE, 2015.
G. Varol, I. Laptev, and C. Schmid. Long-term temporal
convolutions for action recognition. IEEE transactions on
pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 2017.
H. Wang and C. Schmid. Action recognition with improved
trajectories. In International Conference on Computer Vision, 2013.
L. Wang, Y. Qiao, and X. Tang. Action recognition with
trajectory-pooled deep-convolutional descriptors. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and
Pattern Recognition, pages 4305–4314, 2015.
L. Wang, Y. Xiong, Z. Wang, Y. Qiao, D. Lin, X. Tang, and
L. Van Gool. Temporal segment networks: towards good
practices for deep action recognition. In European Conference on Computer Vision, 2016.
X. Wang, A. Farhadi, and A. Gupta. Actions˜ transformations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1512.00795, 2015.
J. Yue-Hei Ng, M. Hausknecht, S. Vijayanarasimhan,
O. Vinyals, R. Monga, and G. Toderici. Beyond short snippets: Deep networks for video classification. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern
Recognition, pages 4694–4702, 2015.
C. Zach, T. Pock, and H. Bischof. A duality based approach
for realtime TV-L1 optical flow. Pattern Recognition, pages
214–223, 2007.
| 1cs.CV
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.