publication_date
stringlengths 20
20
| doc_url
stringlengths 33
34
| id
stringlengths 33
34
| authors
stringlengths 5
20.1k
| update_date
stringlengths 20
20
| category_all
stringlengths 5
138
| abstract
stringlengths 123
3.09k
| category_primary
stringclasses 78
values | title
stringlengths 10
211
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2023-11-16T09:09:32Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09694v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09694v2 | Ashim Gupta, Rishanth Rajendhran, Nathan Stringham, Vivek Srikumar, Ana Marasović | 2024-04-03T15:07:45Z | cs.CL | Do larger and more performant models resolve NLP's longstanding robustness
issues? We investigate this question using over 20 models of different sizes
spanning different architectural choices and pretraining objectives. We conduct
evaluations using (a) out-of-domain and challenge test sets, (b) behavioral
testing with CheckLists, (c) contrast sets, and (d) adversarial inputs. Our
analysis reveals that not all out-of-domain tests provide insight into
robustness. Evaluating with CheckLists and contrast sets shows significant gaps
in model performance; merely scaling models does not make them adequately
robust. Finally, we point out that current approaches for adversarial
evaluations of models are themselves problematic: they can be easily thwarted,
and in their current forms, do not represent a sufficiently deep probe of model
robustness. We conclude that not only is the question of robustness in NLP as
yet unresolved, but even some of the approaches to measure robustness need to
be reassessed. | cs.CL | Whispers of Doubt Amidst Echoes of Triumph in NLP Robustness |
2023-11-16T09:09:22Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09693v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09693v2 | Andrew Blair-Stanek, Nils Holzenberger, Benjamin Van Durme | 2024-02-28T14:46:25Z | cs.CL, cs.AI, I.2.1; I.2.7; J.7 | We find that the best publicly available LLMs like GPT-4, Claude, and {PaLM
2} currently perform poorly at basic legal text handling. We introduce a
benchmark consisting of tasks that lawyers and paralegals would expect LLMs to
handle zero-shot, such as looking up the text at a line of a witness deposition
or at a subsection of a contract. LLMs' poor performance on this benchmark
casts into doubt their reliability as-is for legal practice. However,
fine-tuning for these tasks brings even a smaller model to near-perfect
performance on our test set and also raises performance on a related legal
task. These results suggest that many simple behaviors needed for a domain may
not be present in foundational LLMs, without additional engagement from subject
matter experts. | cs.CL | BLT: Can Large Language Models Handle Basic Legal Text? |
2023-11-16T08:57:53Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09687v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09687v1 | Zihao He, Siyi Guo, Ashwin Rao, Kristina Lerman | 2023-11-16T08:57:53Z | cs.CL | Social media platforms are rife with politically charged discussions.
Therefore, accurately deciphering and predicting partisan biases using Large
Language Models (LLMs) is increasingly critical. In this study, we address the
challenge of understanding political bias in digitized discourse using LLMs.
While traditional approaches often rely on finetuning separate models for each
political faction, our work innovates by employing a singular,
instruction-tuned LLM to reflect a spectrum of political ideologies. We present
a comprehensive analytical framework, consisting of Partisan Bias Divergence
Assessment and Partisan Class Tendency Prediction, to evaluate the model's
alignment with real-world political ideologies in terms of stances, emotions,
and moral foundations. Our findings reveal the model's effectiveness in
capturing emotional and moral nuances, albeit with some challenges in stance
detection, highlighting the intricacies and potential for refinement in NLP
tools for politically sensitive contexts. This research contributes
significantly to the field by demonstrating the feasibility and importance of
nuanced political understanding in LLMs, particularly for applications
requiring acute awareness of political bias. | cs.CL | Inducing Political Bias Allows Language Models Anticipate Partisan Reactions to Controversies |
2023-11-16T08:54:52Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09684v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09684v2 | Zonghai Yao, Ahmed Jaafar, Beining Wang, Zhichao Yang, Hong Yu | 2024-03-19T16:27:37Z | cs.CL, cs.AI | This study examines the effect of prompt engineering on the performance of
Large Language Models (LLMs) in clinical note generation. We introduce an
Automatic Prompt Optimization (APO) framework to refine initial prompts and
compare the outputs of medical experts, non-medical experts, and APO-enhanced
GPT3.5 and GPT4. Results highlight GPT4 APO's superior performance in
standardizing prompt quality across clinical note sections. A human-in-the-loop
approach shows that experts maintain content quality post-APO, with a
preference for their own modifications, suggesting the value of expert
customization. We recommend a two-phase optimization process, leveraging
APO-GPT4 for consistency and expert input for personalization. | cs.CL | Do Physicians Know How to Prompt? The Need for Automatic Prompt Optimization Help in Clinical Note Generation |
2023-11-16T08:52:27Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09682v3 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09682v3 | Yufei Tian, Abhilasha Ravichander, Lianhui Qin, Ronan Le Bras, Raja Marjieh, Nanyun Peng, Yejin Choi, Thomas L. Griffiths, Faeze Brahman | 2024-03-27T23:43:54Z | cs.CL, cs.AI | We explore the creative problem-solving capabilities of modern LLMs in a
novel constrained setting. To this end, we create MACGYVER, an automatically
generated dataset consisting of over 1,600 real-world problems deliberately
designed to trigger innovative usage of objects and necessitate out-of-the-box
thinking. We then present our collection to both LLMs and humans to compare and
contrast their problem-solving abilities. MACGYVER is challenging for both
groups, but in unique and complementary ways. For instance, humans excel in
tasks they are familiar with but struggle with domain-specific knowledge,
leading to a higher variance. In contrast, LLMs, exposed to a variety of
specialized knowledge, attempt broader problems but fail by proposing
physically-infeasible actions. Finally, we provide a detailed error analysis of
LLMs, and demonstrate the potential of enhancing their problem-solving ability
with novel prompting techniques such as iterative step-wise reflection and
divergent-convergent thinking.
This work (1) introduces a fresh arena for intelligent agents focusing on
intricate aspects of physical reasoning, planning, and unconventional thinking,
which supplements the existing spectrum of machine intelligence; and (2)
provides insight into the constrained problem-solving capabilities of both
humans and AI. | cs.CL | MacGyver: Are Large Language Models Creative Problem Solvers? |
2023-11-16T08:45:44Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09677v3 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09677v3 | Hanning Zhang, Shizhe Diao, Yong Lin, Yi R. Fung, Qing Lian, Xingyao Wang, Yangyi Chen, Heng Ji, Tong Zhang | 2024-06-07T02:46:36Z | cs.CL | Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized numerous domains with their
impressive performance but still face their challenges. A predominant issue is
the propensity for these models to generate non-existent facts, a concern
termed hallucination. Our research is motivated by the observation that
previous instruction tuning methods force the model to complete a sentence no
matter whether the model knows the knowledge or not. When the question is out
of the parametric knowledge, it will try to make up something and fail to
indicate when it lacks knowledge. In this paper, we present a new approach
called Refusal-Aware Instruction Tuning (R-Tuning). This approach is formalized
by first identifying the disparity in knowledge encompassed by pre-trained
parameters compared to that of instruction tuning data. Then, we construct the
refusal-aware data based on the knowledge intersection, to tune LLMs to refrain
from responding to questions beyond its parametric knowledge. Experimental
results demonstrate R-Tuning effectively improves a model's ability to answer
known questions and refrain from answering unknown questions. Furthermore, when
tested on out-of-domain datasets, the refusal ability was found to be a
meta-skill that could be generalized to other tasks. Further analysis
surprisingly finds that learning the uncertainty results in better calibration
and an improved ability to estimate the uncertainty than uncertainty-based
testing. Our code is available at https://github.com/shizhediao/R-Tuning. | cs.CL | R-Tuning: Instructing Large Language Models to Say `I Don't Know' |
2023-11-16T08:42:26Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09675v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09675v2 | Maria Antoniak, Joel Mire, Maarten Sap, Elliott Ash, Andrew Piper | 2024-02-27T03:37:03Z | cs.CL | Story detection in online communities is a challenging task as stories are
scattered across communities and interwoven with non-storytelling spans within
a single text. We address this challenge by building and releasing the
StorySeeker toolkit, including a richly annotated dataset of 502 Reddit posts
and comments, a detailed codebook adapted to the social media context, and
models to predict storytelling at the document and span level. Our dataset is
sampled from hundreds of popular English-language Reddit communities ranging
across 33 topic categories, and it contains fine-grained expert annotations,
including binary story labels, story spans, and event spans. We evaluate a
range of detection methods using our data, and we identify the distinctive
textual features of online storytelling, focusing on storytelling span
detection, which we introduce as a new task. We illuminate distributional
characteristics of storytelling on a large community-centric social media
platform, and we also conduct a case study on r/ChangeMyView, where
storytelling is used as one of many persuasive strategies, illustrating that
our data and models can be used for both inter- and intra-community research.
Finally, we discuss implications of our tools and analyses for narratology and
the study of online communities. | cs.CL | Where Do People Tell Stories Online? Story Detection Across Online Communities |
2023-11-16T08:36:00Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09668v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09668v1 | Yuhang Li, Yihan Wang, Zhouxing Shi, Cho-Jui Hsieh | 2023-11-16T08:36:00Z | cs.CL, cs.CR, cs.LG | The strong general capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) bring
potential ethical risks if they are unrestrictedly accessible to malicious
users. Token-level watermarking inserts watermarks in the generated texts by
altering the token probability distributions with a private random number
generator seeded by its prefix tokens. However, this watermarking algorithm
alters the logits during generation, which can lead to a downgraded text
quality if it chooses to promote tokens that are less relevant given the input.
In this work, we propose to improve the quality of texts generated by a
watermarked language model by Watermarking with Importance Scoring (WIS). At
each generation step, we estimate the importance of the token to generate, and
prevent it from being impacted by watermarking if it is important for the
semantic correctness of the output. We further propose three methods to predict
importance scoring, including a perturbation-based method and two model-based
methods. Empirical experiments show that our method can generate texts with
better quality with comparable level of detection rate. | cs.CL | Improving the Generation Quality of Watermarked Large Language Models via Word Importance Scoring |
2023-11-16T08:30:15Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09665v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09665v2 | Yun-Shiuan Chuang, Siddharth Suresh, Nikunj Harlalka, Agam Goyal, Robert Hawkins, Sijia Yang, Dhavan Shah, Junjie Hu, Timothy T. Rogers | 2024-02-16T16:43:53Z | cs.CL | Human groups are able to converge on more accurate beliefs through
deliberation, even in the presence of polarization and partisan bias -- a
phenomenon known as the "wisdom of partisan crowds." Generated agents powered
by Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used to simulate human
collective behavior, yet few benchmarks exist for evaluating their dynamics
against the behavior of human groups. In this paper, we examine the extent to
which the wisdom of partisan crowds emerges in groups of LLM-based agents that
are prompted to role-play as partisan personas (e.g., Democrat or Republican).
We find that they not only display human-like partisan biases, but also
converge to more accurate beliefs through deliberation as humans do. We then
identify several factors that interfere with convergence, including the use of
chain-of-thought prompt and lack of details in personas. Conversely,
fine-tuning on human data appears to enhance convergence. These findings show
the potential and limitations of LLM-based agents as a model of human
collective intelligence. | cs.CL | The Wisdom of Partisan Crowds: Comparing Collective Intelligence in Humans and LLM-based Agents |
2023-11-16T08:28:00Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09661v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09661v1 | Yun-Shiuan Chuang, Yi Wu, Dhruv Gupta, Rheeya Uppaal, Ananya Kumar, Luhang Sun, Makesh Narsimhan Sreedhar, Sijia Yang, Timothy T. Rogers, Junjie Hu | 2023-11-16T08:28:00Z | cs.CL | Adapting pre-trained language models (PLMs) for time-series text
classification amidst evolving domain shifts (EDS) is critical for maintaining
accuracy in applications like stance detection. This study benchmarks the
effectiveness of evolving domain adaptation (EDA) strategies, notably
self-training, domain-adversarial training, and domain-adaptive pretraining,
with a focus on an incremental self-training method. Our analysis across
various datasets reveals that this incremental method excels at adapting PLMs
to EDS, outperforming traditional domain adaptation techniques. These findings
highlight the importance of continually updating PLMs to ensure their
effectiveness in real-world applications, paving the way for future research
into PLM robustness against the natural temporal evolution of language. | cs.CL | Evolving Domain Adaptation of Pretrained Language Models for Text Classification |
2023-11-16T08:20:36Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09656v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09656v2 | Siru Ouyang, Zhuosheng Zhang, Bing Yan, Xuan Liu, Yejin Choi, Jiawei Han, Lianhui Qin | 2024-02-09T16:35:28Z | cs.CL, cs.AI | Large Language Models (LLMs) excel in diverse areas, yet struggle with
complex scientific reasoning, especially in the field of chemistry. Different
from the simple chemistry tasks (e.g., molecule classification) addressed in
previous studies, complex chemistry problems require not only vast knowledge
and precise calculation, but also compositional reasoning about rich dynamic
interactions of different concepts (e.g., temperature changes). Our study shows
that even advanced LLMs, like GPT-4, can fail easily in different ways.
Interestingly, the errors often stem not from a lack of domain knowledge within
the LLMs, but rather from the absence of an effective reasoning structure that
guides the LLMs to elicit the right knowledge, incorporate the knowledge in
step-by-step reasoning, and iteratively refine results for further improved
quality. On this basis, we introduce StructChem, a simple yet effective
prompting strategy that offers the desired guidance and substantially boosts
the LLMs' chemical reasoning capability. Testing across four chemistry areas --
quantum chemistry, mechanics, physical chemistry, and kinetics -- StructChem
substantially enhances GPT-4's performance, with up to 30\% peak improvement.
Our analysis also underscores the unique difficulties of precise grounded
reasoning in science with LLMs, highlighting a need for more research in this
area. Code is available at \url{https://github.com/ozyyshr/StructChem}. | cs.CL | Structured Chemistry Reasoning with Large Language Models |
2023-11-16T08:01:17Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09649v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09649v2 | Yaxin Zhu, Hamed Zamani | 2024-04-15T13:16:46Z | cs.LG, cs.CL | This paper focuses on the task of Extreme Multi-Label Classification (XMC)
whose goal is to predict multiple labels for each instance from an extremely
large label space. While existing research has primarily focused on fully
supervised XMC, real-world scenarios often lack supervision signals,
highlighting the importance of zero-shot settings. Given the large label space,
utilizing in-context learning approaches is not trivial. We address this issue
by introducing In-Context Extreme Multilabel Learning (ICXML), a two-stage
framework that cuts down the search space by generating a set of candidate
labels through incontext learning and then reranks them. Extensive experiments
suggest that ICXML advances the state of the art on two diverse public
benchmarks. | cs.LG | ICXML: An In-Context Learning Framework for Zero-Shot Extreme Multi-Label Classification |
2023-11-16T07:59:12Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09648v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09648v2 | Yidan Sun, Qin Chao, Boyang Li | 2024-04-02T02:31:59Z | cs.CL | Cognitive science and symbolic AI research suggest that event causality
provides vital information for story understanding. However, machine learning
systems for story understanding rarely employ event causality, partially due to
the lack of methods that reliably identify open-world causal event relations.
Leveraging recent progress in large language models, we present the first
method for event causality identification that leads to material improvements
in computational story understanding. Our technique sets a new state of the art
on the COPES dataset (Wang et al., 2023) for causal event relation
identification. Further, in the downstream story quality evaluation task, the
identified causal relations lead to 3.6-16.6% relative improvement on
correlation with human ratings. In the multimodal story video-text alignment
task, we attain 4.1-10.9% increase on Clip Accuracy and 4.2-13.5% increase on
Sentence IoU. The findings indicate substantial untapped potential for event
causality in computational story understanding. The codebase is at
https://github.com/insundaycathy/Event-Causality-Extraction. | cs.CL | Event Causality Is Key to Computational Story Understanding |
2023-11-16T07:48:45Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09641v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09641v2 | Jiongxiao Wang, Junlin Wu, Muhao Chen, Yevgeniy Vorobeychik, Chaowei Xiao | 2024-06-19T22:40:07Z | cs.AI, cs.CL, cs.CR, cs.HC | Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback (RLHF) is a methodology designed
to align Large Language Models (LLMs) with human preferences, playing an
important role in LLMs alignment. Despite its advantages, RLHF relies on human
annotators to rank the text, which can introduce potential security
vulnerabilities if any adversarial annotator (i.e., attackers) manipulates the
ranking score by up-ranking any malicious text to steer the LLM adversarially.
To assess the red-teaming of RLHF against human preference data poisoning, we
propose RankPoison, a poisoning attack method on candidates' selection of
preference rank flipping to reach certain malicious behaviors (e.g., generating
longer sequences, which can increase the computational cost). With poisoned
dataset generated by RankPoison, we can perform poisoning attacks on LLMs to
generate longer tokens without hurting the original safety alignment
performance. Moreover, applying RankPoison, we also successfully implement a
backdoor attack where LLMs can generate longer answers under questions with the
trigger word. Our findings highlight critical security challenges in RLHF,
underscoring the necessity for more robust alignment methods for LLMs. | cs.AI | RLHFPoison: Reward Poisoning Attack for Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback in Large Language Models |
2023-11-16T07:37:25Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09635v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09635v2 | Arkil Patel, Siva Reddy, Dzmitry Bahdanau, Pradeep Dasigi | 2024-04-04T18:54:01Z | cs.CL | Contemporary Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit a high degree of code
generation and comprehension capability. A particularly promising area is their
ability to interpret code modules from unfamiliar libraries for solving
user-instructed tasks. Recent work has shown that large proprietary LLMs can
learn novel library usage in-context from demonstrations. These results raise
several open questions: whether demonstrations of library usage is required,
whether smaller (and more open) models also possess such capabilities, etc. In
this work, we take a broader approach by systematically evaluating a diverse
array of LLMs across three scenarios reflecting varying levels of domain
specialization to understand their abilities and limitations in generating code
based on libraries defined in-context. Our results show that even smaller
open-source LLMs like Llama-2 and StarCoder demonstrate an adept understanding
of novel code libraries based on specification presented in-context. Our
findings further reveal that LLMs exhibit a surprisingly high proficiency in
learning novel library modules even when provided with just natural language
descriptions or raw code implementations of the functions, which are often
cheaper to obtain than demonstrations. Overall, our results pave the way for
harnessing LLMs in more adaptable and dynamic coding environments. | cs.CL | Evaluating In-Context Learning of Libraries for Code Generation |
2023-11-16T07:31:18Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2312.00029v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.00029v2 | Matthew Pisano, Peter Ly, Abraham Sanders, Bingsheng Yao, Dakuo Wang, Tomek Strzalkowski, Mei Si | 2024-03-15T20:13:06Z | cs.CR, cs.AI, cs.CL | Research into AI alignment has grown considerably since the recent
introduction of increasingly capable Large Language Models (LLMs).
Unfortunately, modern methods of alignment still fail to fully prevent harmful
responses when models are deliberately attacked. These attacks can trick
seemingly aligned models into giving manufacturing instructions for dangerous
materials, inciting violence, or recommending other immoral acts. To help
mitigate this issue, we introduce Bergeron: a framework designed to improve the
robustness of LLMs against attacks without any additional parameter
fine-tuning. Bergeron is organized into two tiers; with a secondary LLM
emulating the conscience of a protected, primary LLM. This framework better
safeguards the primary model against incoming attacks while monitoring its
output for any harmful content. Empirical analysis shows that, by using
Bergeron to complement models with existing alignment training, we can improve
the robustness and safety of multiple, commonly used commercial and open-source
LLMs. | cs.CR | Bergeron: Combating Adversarial Attacks through a Conscience-Based Alignment Framework |
2023-11-16T07:31:03Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09632v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09632v1 | Yuhao Wu, Tongjun Shi, Karthick Sharma, Chun Wei Seah, Shuhao Zhang | 2023-11-16T07:31:03Z | cs.CL, cs.AI | Large Language Models (LLMs) serve as repositories of extensive world
knowledge, enabling them to perform tasks such as question-answering and
fact-checking. However, this knowledge can become obsolete as global contexts
change. In this paper, we introduce a novel problem in the realm of continual
learning: Online Continual Knowledge Learning (OCKL). This problem formulation
aims to manage the dynamic nature of world knowledge in LMs under real-time
constraints. We propose a new benchmark and evaluation metric designed to
measure both the rate of new knowledge acquisition and the retention of
previously learned knowledge. Our empirical evaluation, conducted using a
variety of state-of-the-art methods, establishes robust base-lines for OCKL.
Our results reveal that existing continual learning approaches are
unfortunately insufficient for tackling the unique challenges posed by OCKL. We
identify key factors that influence the trade-off between knowledge acquisition
and retention, thereby advancing our understanding of how to train LMs in a
continually evolving environment. | cs.CL | Online Continual Knowledge Learning for Language Models |
2023-11-16T07:22:56Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09630v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09630v2 | Yanchen Liu, Mingyu Derek Ma, Wenna Qin, Azure Zhou, Jiaao Chen, Weiyan Shi, Wei Wang, Diyi Yang | 2024-02-16T09:12:21Z | cs.CL, cs.CY, cs.SI | Susceptibility to misinformation describes the degree of belief in
unverifiable claims, a latent aspect of individuals' mental processes that is
not observable. Existing susceptibility studies heavily rely on self-reported
beliefs, which can be subject to bias, expensive to collect, and challenging to
scale for downstream applications. To address these limitations, in this work,
we propose a computational approach to model users' latent susceptibility
levels. As shown in previous research, susceptibility is influenced by various
factors (e.g., demographic factors, political ideology), and directly
influences people's reposting behavior on social media. To represent the
underlying mental process, our susceptibility modeling incorporates these
factors as inputs, guided by the supervision of people's sharing behavior.
Using COVID-19 as a testbed domain, our experiments demonstrate a significant
alignment between the susceptibility scores estimated by our computational
modeling and human judgments, confirming the effectiveness of this latent
modeling approach. Furthermore, we apply our model to annotate susceptibility
scores on a large-scale dataset and analyze the relationships between
susceptibility with various factors. Our analysis reveals that political
leanings and psychological factors exhibit varying degrees of association with
susceptibility to COVID-19 misinformation. | cs.CL | Decoding Susceptibility: Modeling Misbelief to Misinformation Through a Computational Approach |
2023-11-16T07:16:55Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09627v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09627v2 | Nakyeong Yang, Taegwan Kang, Jungkyu Choi, Honglak Lee, Kyomin Jung | 2024-06-05T05:49:19Z | cs.AI, cs.CL, cs.LG | Instruction-following language models often show undesirable biases. These
undesirable biases may be accelerated in the real-world usage of language
models, where a wide range of instructions is used through zero-shot example
prompting. To solve this problem, we first define the bias neuron, which
significantly affects biased outputs, and prove its existence empirically.
Furthermore, we propose a novel and practical bias mitigation method, CRISPR,
to eliminate bias neurons of language models in instruction-following settings.
CRISPR automatically determines biased outputs and categorizes neurons that
affect the biased outputs as bias neurons using an explainability method.
Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of our method in mitigating
biases under zero-shot instruction-following settings without losing the
model's task performance and existing knowledge. The experimental results
reveal the generalizability of our method as it shows robustness under various
instructions and datasets. Surprisingly, our method can mitigate the bias in
language models by eliminating only a few neurons (at least three). | cs.AI | Mitigating Biases for Instruction-following Language Models via Bias Neurons Elimination |
2023-11-16T07:03:54Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09619v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09619v2 | Kazuma Hashimoto, Karthik Raman, Michael Bendersky | 2024-04-02T21:05:40Z | cs.CL | In-Context Learning (ICL) is an emergent capability of Large Language Models
(LLMs). Only a few demonstrations enable LLMs to be used as blackbox for new
tasks. Previous studies have shown that using LLMs' outputs as labels is
effective in training models to select demonstrations. Such a label is expected
to estimate utility of a demonstration in ICL; however, it has not been well
understood how different labeling strategies affect results on target tasks.
This paper presents an analysis on different utility functions by focusing on
LLMs' output probability given ground-truth output, and task-specific reward
given LLMs' prediction. Unlike the previous work, we introduce a novel labeling
method, incremental utility, which estimates how much incremental knowledge is
brought into the LLMs by a demonstration. We conduct experiments with
instruction-tuned LLMs on binary/multi-class classification, segmentation, and
translation across Arabic, English, Finnish, Japanese, and Spanish. Our results
show that (1) the probability is effective when the probability values are
distributed across the whole value range (on the classification tasks), and (2)
the downstream metric is more robust when nuanced reward values are provided
with long outputs (on the segmentation and translation tasks). We then show
that the proposed incremental utility further helps ICL by contrasting how the
LLMs perform with and without the demonstrations. | cs.CL | Take One Step at a Time to Know Incremental Utility of Demonstration: An Analysis on Reranking for Few-Shot In-Context Learning |
2023-11-16T07:01:48Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09618v4 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09618v4 | Yun-Shiuan Chuang, Agam Goyal, Nikunj Harlalka, Siddharth Suresh, Robert Hawkins, Sijia Yang, Dhavan Shah, Junjie Hu, Timothy T. Rogers | 2024-04-01T01:12:35Z | physics.soc-ph, cs.CL | Accurately simulating human opinion dynamics is crucial for understanding a
variety of societal phenomena, including polarization and the spread of
misinformation. However, the agent-based models (ABMs) commonly used for such
simulations often over-simplify human behavior. We propose a new approach to
simulating opinion dynamics based on populations of Large Language Models
(LLMs). Our findings reveal a strong inherent bias in LLM agents towards
producing accurate information, leading simulated agents to consensus in line
with scientific reality. This bias limits their utility for understanding
resistance to consensus views on issues like climate change. After inducing
confirmation bias through prompt engineering, however, we observed opinion
fragmentation in line with existing agent-based modeling and opinion dynamics
research. These insights highlight the promise and limitations of LLM agents in
this domain and suggest a path forward: refining LLMs with real-world discourse
to better simulate the evolution of human beliefs. | physics.soc-ph | Simulating Opinion Dynamics with Networks of LLM-based Agents |
2023-11-16T06:59:54Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09615v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09615v2 | Ting-Rui Chiang, Xinyan Velocity Yu, Joshua Robinson, Ollie Liu, Isabelle Lee, Dani Yogatama | 2024-04-02T06:23:23Z | cs.CL | Augmenting a language model (LM) with $k$-nearest neighbors ($k$NN) retrieval
on its training data alone can decrease its perplexity, though the underlying
reasons for this remain elusive. In this work, we rule out one previously
posited possibility -- the "softmax bottleneck." We then create a new dataset
to evaluate LM generalization ability in the setting where training data
contains additional information that is not causally relevant. This task is
challenging even for GPT-3.5 Turbo. We show that, for both GPT-2 and Mistral
7B, $k$NN retrieval augmentation consistently improves performance in this
setting. Finally, to make $k$NN retrieval more accessible, we propose using a
multi-layer perceptron model that maps datastore keys to values as a drop-in
replacement for traditional retrieval. This reduces storage costs by over 25x. | cs.CL | On Retrieval Augmentation and the Limitations of Language Model Training |
2023-11-16T06:51:46Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09613v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09613v2 | Yuling Gu, Oyvind Tafjord, Peter Clark | 2024-02-16T08:49:07Z | cs.CL, cs.AI | While LLMs can provide reasoned explanations along with their answers, the
nature and quality of those explanations are still poorly understood. In
response, our goal is to define a detailed way of characterizing the
explanation capabilities of modern models and to create a nuanced,
interpretable explanation evaluation tool that can generate such
characterizations automatically, without relying on expensive API calls or
human annotations. Our approach is to (a) define the new task of explanation
critiquing - identifying and categorizing any main flaw in an explanation and
providing suggestions to address the flaw, (b) create a sizeable,
human-verified dataset for this task, and (c) train an open-source, automatic
critique model (called Digital Socrates) using this data. Through quantitative
and qualitative analysis, we demonstrate how Digital Socrates is useful for
revealing insights about student models by examining their reasoning chains,
and how it can provide high-quality, nuanced, automatic evaluation of those
model explanations for the first time. Digital Socrates thus fills an important
gap in evaluation tools for understanding and improving the explanation
behavior of models. | cs.CL | Digital Socrates: Evaluating LLMs through Explanation Critiques |
2023-11-16T06:50:26Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09612v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09612v2 | Wang Zhu, Alekh Agarwal, Mandar Joshi, Robin Jia, Jesse Thomason, Kristina Toutanova | 2024-04-02T00:11:50Z | cs.CV, cs.CL | Understanding visually situated language requires interpreting complex
layouts of textual and visual elements. Pre-processing tools, such as optical
character recognition (OCR), can map document image inputs to textual tokens,
then large language models (LLMs) can reason over text. However, such methods
have high computational and engineering complexity. Can small pretrained
image-to-text models accurately understand visual documents through similar
recognition and reasoning steps instead? We propose Rationale Distillation
(RD), which incorporates the outputs of OCR tools, LLMs, and larger multimodal
models as intermediate "rationales", and trains a small student model to
predict both rationales and answers. On three visual document understanding
benchmarks representing infographics, scanned documents, and figures, our
Pix2Struct (282M parameters) student model finetuned with RD outperforms the
base model by 4-5% absolute accuracy with only 1% higher computational cost. | cs.CV | Efficient End-to-End Visual Document Understanding with Rationale Distillation |
2023-11-16T06:28:05Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09606v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09606v2 | Shivanshu Gupta, Clemens Rosenbaum, Ethan R. Elenberg | 2024-02-22T05:15:55Z | cs.CL | In-context Learning (ICL) is the ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) to
perform new tasks when conditioned on prompts comprising a few task examples.
However, ICL performance can be critically sensitive to the choice of examples.
To dynamically select the best examples for every test input, we propose
Example Gisting, a novel approach for training example encoders through
supervised fine-tuning with an attention bottleneck between the inputs and
outputs. These gist models form the basis for GistScore, a novel metric for
scoring and selecting informative examples. Further, we experiment with two
variations: (1) fine-tuning gist models for each dataset and (2) multi-task
training a single model on a large collection of datasets. The latter can be
used for new tasks out-of-the-box, enabling a training-free ICL pipeline.
Evaluations with 21 datasets spanning 9 tasks and 8 diverse LLMs show that our
fine-tuned models get state-of-the-art ICL performance with over 20% absolute
gain over off-the-shelf retrievers and 5% over the best prior methods. Further,
our multi-task model generalizes well to new tasks, datasets, and prompt
templates. Selection using this model matches or outperforms prior methods
while being three orders of magnitude faster than the strongest training-free
baseline. | cs.CL | GistScore: Learning Better Representations for In-Context Example Selection with Gist Bottlenecks |
2023-11-16T06:27:35Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09605v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09605v1 | Yanai Elazar, Bhargavi Paranjape, Hao Peng, Sarah Wiegreffe, Khyathi Raghavi, Vivek Srikumar, Sameer Singh, Noah A. Smith | 2023-11-16T06:27:35Z | cs.CL | The inevitable appearance of spurious correlations in training datasets hurts
the generalization of NLP models on unseen data. Previous work has found that
datasets with paired inputs are prone to correlations between a specific part
of the input (e.g., the hypothesis in NLI) and the label; consequently, models
trained only on those outperform chance. Are these correlations picked up by
models trained on the full input data? To address this question, we propose a
new evaluation method, Counterfactual Attentiveness Test (CAT). CAT uses
counterfactuals by replacing part of the input with its counterpart from a
different example (subject to some restrictions), expecting an attentive model
to change its prediction. Using CAT, we systematically investigate established
supervised and in-context learning models on ten datasets spanning four tasks:
natural language inference, reading comprehension, paraphrase detection, and
visual & language reasoning. CAT reveals that reliance on such correlations is
mainly data-dependent. Surprisingly, we find that GPT3 becomes less attentive
with an increased number of demonstrations, while its accuracy on the test data
improves. Our results demonstrate that augmenting training or demonstration
data with counterfactuals is effective in improving models' attentiveness. We
show that models' attentiveness measured by CAT reveals different conclusions
from solely measuring correlations in data. | cs.CL | Measuring and Improving Attentiveness to Partial Inputs with Counterfactuals |
2023-11-16T06:22:17Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09603v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09603v2 | Ziyi Liu, Isabelle Lee, Yongkang Du, Soumya Sanyal, Jieyu Zhao | 2024-02-19T18:01:56Z | cs.CL | In a plethora of recent work, large language models (LLMs) demonstrated
impressive reasoning ability, but many proposed downstream reasoning tasks
focus on performance-wise evaluation. Two fundamental questions persist: 1) how
reliable is the quality of reasoning, and 2) can models detect unreliable
reasoning? In this paper, we investigate self-contradictory (Self-Contra)
reasoning, where the model reasoning does not support predictions. To address
1), we assess the Self-Contra rate across four datasets and delve into
finer-grained categories of Self-Contra reasoning. We find that LLMs often
contradict themselves when performing reasoning tasks that involve contextual
information understanding or commonsense. Importantly, a higher accuracy does
not necessarily correspond to a lower Self-Contra rate. The model may appear to
generate correct answers but it may take shortcuts in reasoning or skip over
contextual evidence, thereby displaying Self-Contra behaviors with compromised
reasoning. As for 2), we task GPT-4 with identifying Self-Contra reasoning and
finer-grained fallacies. We observe that GPT-4 struggles to effectively detect
Self-Contra reasoning, with significantly low performance compared with human
judgment. Our results indicate that the current LLMs lack robustness necessary
for reliable reasoning and we emphasize the urgent need for establishing best
practices in comprehensive reasoning evaluations beyond accuracy-based metrics. | cs.CL | Self-Contradictory Reasoning Evaluation and Detection |
2023-11-16T06:20:13Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09602v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09602v2 | Smriti Singh, Cornelia Caragea, Junyi Jessy Li | 2024-03-25T20:42:57Z | cs.CL | Situations and events evoke emotions in humans, but to what extent do they
inform the prediction of emotion detection models? This work investigates how
well human-annotated emotion triggers correlate with features that models
deemed salient in their prediction of emotions. First, we introduce a novel
dataset EmoTrigger, consisting of 900 social media posts sourced from three
different datasets; these were annotated by experts for emotion triggers with
high agreement. Using EmoTrigger, we evaluate the ability of large language
models (LLMs) to identify emotion triggers, and conduct a comparative analysis
of the features considered important for these tasks between LLMs and
fine-tuned models. Our analysis reveals that emotion triggers are largely not
considered salient features for emotion prediction models, instead there is
intricate interplay between various features and the task of emotion detection. | cs.CL | Language Models (Mostly) Do Not Consider Emotion Triggers When Predicting Emotion |
2023-11-16T06:05:47Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09593v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09593v2 | Ramya Ramakrishnan, Ethan R. Elenberg, Hashan Narangodage, Ryan McDonald | 2024-02-13T01:47:52Z | cs.CL, cs.AI | In task-oriented dialogue, a system often needs to follow a sequence of
actions, called a workflow, that complies with a set of guidelines in order to
complete a task. In this paper, we propose the novel problem of multi-step
workflow action prediction, in which the system predicts multiple future
workflow actions. Accurate prediction of multiple steps allows for multi-turn
automation, which can free up time to focus on more complex tasks. We propose
three modeling approaches that are simple to implement yet lead to more action
automation: 1) fine-tuning on a training dataset, 2) few-shot in-context
learning leveraging retrieval and large language model prompting, and 3)
zero-shot graph traversal, which aggregates historical action sequences into a
graph for prediction. We show that multi-step action prediction produces
features that improve accuracy on downstream dialogue tasks like predicting
task success, and can increase automation of steps by 20% without requiring as
much feedback from a human overseeing the system. | cs.CL | Multi-Step Dialogue Workflow Action Prediction |
2023-11-16T06:01:47Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.10777v4 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.10777v4 | Yan Cathy Hua, Paul Denny, Katerina Taskova, Jörg Wicker | 2024-04-16T10:59:11Z | cs.CL, cs.LG | Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis (ABSA) is a fine-grained type of sentiment
analysis that identifies aspects and their associated opinions from a given
text. With the surge of digital opinionated text data, ABSA gained increasing
popularity for its ability to mine more detailed and targeted insights. Many
review papers on ABSA subtasks and solution methodologies exist, however, few
focus on trends over time or systemic issues relating to research application
domains, datasets, and solution approaches. To fill the gap, this paper
presents a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) of ABSA studies with a focus on
trends and high-level relationships among these fundamental components. This
review is one of the largest SLRs on ABSA, and also, to our knowledge, the
first that systematically examines the trends and inter-relations among ABSA
research and data distribution across domains and solution paradigms and
approaches. Our sample includes 519 primary studies screened from 4191 search
results without time constraints via an innovative automatic filtering process.
Our quantitative analysis not only identifies trends in nearly two decades of
ABSA research development but also unveils a systemic lack of dataset and
domain diversity as well as domain mismatch that may hinder the development of
future ABSA research. We discuss these findings and their implications and
propose suggestions for future research. | cs.CL | A Systematic Review of Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis (ABSA): Domains, Methods, and Trends |
2023-11-16T05:43:02Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09585v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09585v2 | Minbeom Kim, Jahyun Koo, Hwanhee Lee, Joonsuk Park, Hwaran Lee, Kyomin Jung | 2024-03-19T02:20:50Z | cs.CL | As large language models become increasingly integrated into daily life,
detecting implicit toxicity across diverse contexts is crucial. To this end, we
introduce LifeTox, a dataset designed for identifying implicit toxicity within
a broad range of advice-seeking scenarios. Unlike existing safety datasets,
LifeTox comprises diverse contexts derived from personal experiences through
open-ended questions. Experiments demonstrate that RoBERTa fine-tuned on
LifeTox matches or surpasses the zero-shot performance of large language models
in toxicity classification tasks. These results underscore the efficacy of
LifeTox in addressing the complex challenges inherent in implicit toxicity. We
open-sourced the
dataset\footnote{\url{https://huggingface.co/datasets/mbkim/LifeTox}} and the
LifeTox moderator family; 350M, 7B, and 13B. | cs.CL | LifeTox: Unveiling Implicit Toxicity in Life Advice |
2023-11-16T05:32:09Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09581v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09581v2 | Yiqing Xie, Sheng Zhang, Hao Cheng, Pengfei Liu, Zelalem Gero, Cliff Wong, Tristan Naumann, Hoifung Poon, Carolyn Rose | 2024-02-18T20:39:06Z | cs.CL | Medical text generation aims to assist with administrative work and highlight
salient information to support decision-making. To reflect the specific
requirements of medical text, in this paper, we propose a set of metrics to
evaluate the completeness, conciseness, and attribution of the generated text
at a fine-grained level. The metrics can be computed by various types of
evaluators including instruction-following (both proprietary and open-source)
and supervised entailment models. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the
resulting framework, DocLens, with three evaluators on three tasks: clinical
note generation, radiology report summarization, and patient question
summarization. A comprehensive human study shows that DocLens exhibits
substantially higher agreement with the judgments of medical experts than
existing metrics. The results also highlight the need to improve open-source
evaluators and suggest potential directions. | cs.CL | DocLens: Multi-aspect Fine-grained Evaluation for Medical Text Generation |
2023-11-16T05:31:21Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09580v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09580v1 | Haofei Yu, Paul Pu Liang, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, Louis-Philippe Morency | 2023-11-16T05:31:21Z | cs.CL | Multimodal machine learning, which studies the information and interactions
across various input modalities, has made significant advancements in
understanding the relationship between images and descriptive text. However,
this is just a portion of the potential multimodal interactions seen in the
real world and does not include new interactions between conflicting utterances
and gestures in predicting sarcasm, for example. Notably, the current methods
for capturing shared information often do not extend well to these more nuanced
interactions, sometimes performing as low as 50% in binary classification. In
this paper, we address this problem via a new approach called MMOE, which
stands for a mixture of multimodal interaction experts. Our method
automatically classifies data points from unlabeled multimodal datasets by
their interaction type and employs specialized models for each specific
interaction. Based on our experiments, this approach improves performance on
these challenging interactions by more than 10%, leading to an overall increase
of 2% for tasks like sarcasm prediction. As a result, interaction
quantification provides new insights for dataset analysis and yields simple
approaches that obtain state-of-the-art performance. | cs.CL | MMOE: Mixture of Multimodal Interaction Experts |
2023-11-16T05:30:07Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09579v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09579v2 | Yoonsang Lee, Pranav Atreya, Xi Ye, Eunsol Choi | 2024-04-04T01:00:16Z | cs.CL | In-context learning can improve the performances of knowledge-rich tasks such
as question answering. In such scenarios, in-context examples trigger a
language model (LM) to surface information stored in its parametric knowledge.
We study how to better construct in-context example sets, based on whether the
model is aware of the in-context examples. We identify 'known' examples, where
models can correctly answer from their parametric knowledge, and 'unknown'
ones. Our experiments show that prompting with 'unknown' examples decreases the
performance, potentially as it encourages hallucination rather than searching
for its parametric knowledge. Constructing an in-context example set that
presents both known and unknown information performs the best across diverse
settings. We perform analysis on three multi-answer question answering
datasets, which allows us to further study answer set ordering strategies based
on the LM's knowledge of each answer. Together, our study sheds light on how to
best construct in-context example sets for knowledge-rich tasks. | cs.CL | Crafting In-context Examples according to LMs' Parametric Knowledge |
2023-11-16T05:29:39Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09578v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09578v2 | Adithya Renduchintala, Tugrul Konuk, Oleksii Kuchaiev | 2024-04-12T23:15:51Z | cs.CL, cs.AI, cs.LG | We introduce Tied-LoRA, a novel paradigm leveraging weight tying and
selective training to enhance the parameter efficiency of Low-rank Adaptation
(LoRA). Our exploration encompasses different plausible combinations of
parameter training and freezing, coupled with weight tying, aimed at
identifying the optimal trade-off between performance and the count of
trainable parameters. Across $5$ diverse tasks and two foundational language
models with different parameter counts, our experiments provide comprehensive
insights into the inherent trade-offs between efficiency and performance.
Our findings reveal a specific Tied-LoRA configuration that distinguishes
itself by showcasing comparable performance to LoRA across multiple tasks while
utilizing only a fraction of the parameters employed by the standard LoRA
method, particularly at elevated ranks. This underscores the efficacy of
Tied-LoRA in achieving impressive results with significantly reduced model
complexity. | cs.CL | Tied-Lora: Enhancing parameter efficiency of LoRA with weight tying |
2023-11-16T05:21:25Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09576v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09576v1 | Chen Zhang | 2023-11-16T05:21:25Z | cs.CL, cs.AI | AI agents excel in executing predefined tasks, but the dynamic management of
work state information during task execution remains an underexplored area. We
propose a work state-centric AI agent model employing "work notes" to record
and reflect the state throughout task execution. This paper details the model's
architecture, featuring worker threads for task oversight, planner modules for
task decomposition and planning, and executor modules for performing subtasks
using a ReAct-inspired thought-action loop. We provide an exhaustive work state
record incorporating plans and outcomes, constituting a comprehensive work
journal. Our results show that this model not only improves task execution
efficiency but also lays a solid foundation for subsequent task analysis and
auditing. | cs.CL | Work State-Centric AI Agents: Design, Implementation, and Management of Cognitive Work Threads |
2023-11-16T05:08:33Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09569v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09569v2 | Yao Lu, Jiayi Wang, Raphael Tang, Sebastian Riedel, Pontus Stenetorp | 2024-04-17T06:00:51Z | cs.CL, cs.AI | Recent prompt optimisation approaches use the generative nature of language
models to produce prompts -- even rivaling the performance of human-curated
prompts. In this paper, we demonstrate that randomly sampling tokens from the
model vocabulary as ``separators'' can be as effective as language models for
prompt-style text classification. Our experiments show that random separators
are competitive baselines, having less than a 1% difference compared to
previous self-optimisation methods and showing a 12% average relative
improvement over strong human baselines across nine text classification tasks
and eight language models. We further analyse this phenomenon in detail using
three different random generation strategies, establishing that the language
space is rich with potentially good separators, with a greater than 40% average
chance that a randomly drawn separator performs better than human-curated
separators. These observations challenge the common assumption that an
effective prompt should be human readable or task relevant and establish a
strong baseline for prompt optimisation research. | cs.CL | Strings from the Library of Babel: Random Sampling as a Strong Baseline for Prompt Optimisation |
2023-11-16T04:57:49Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09564v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09564v1 | Mihir Parmar, Aakanksha Naik, Himanshu Gupta, Disha Agrawal, Chitta Baral | 2023-11-16T04:57:49Z | cs.CL, cs.AI | Many large language models (LLMs) for medicine have largely been evaluated on
short texts, and their ability to handle longer sequences such as a complete
electronic health record (EHR) has not been systematically explored. Assessing
these models on long sequences is crucial since prior work in the general
domain has demonstrated performance degradation of LLMs on longer texts.
Motivated by this, we introduce LongBoX, a collection of seven medical datasets
in text-to-text format, designed to investigate model performance on long
sequences. Preliminary experiments reveal that both medical LLMs (e.g., BioGPT)
and strong general domain LLMs (e.g., FLAN-T5) struggle on this benchmark. We
further evaluate two techniques designed for long-sequence handling: (i)
local-global attention, and (ii) Fusion-in-Decoder (FiD). Our results
demonstrate mixed results with long-sequence handling - while scores on some
datasets increase, there is substantial room for improvement. We hope that
LongBoX facilitates the development of more effective long-sequence techniques
for the medical domain. Data and source code are available at
https://github.com/Mihir3009/LongBoX. | cs.CL | LongBoX: Evaluating Transformers on Long-Sequence Clinical Tasks |
2023-11-16T04:43:03Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09562v3 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09562v3 | Kuan-Hao Huang, I-Hung Hsu, Tanmay Parekh, Zhiyu Xie, Zixuan Zhang, Premkumar Natarajan, Kai-Wei Chang, Nanyun Peng, Heng Ji | 2024-06-06T04:24:16Z | cs.CL | Event extraction has gained considerable interest due to its wide-ranging
applications. However, recent studies draw attention to evaluation issues,
suggesting that reported scores may not accurately reflect the true
performance. In this work, we identify and address evaluation challenges,
including inconsistency due to varying data assumptions or preprocessing steps,
the insufficiency of current evaluation frameworks that may introduce dataset
or data split bias, and the low reproducibility of some previous approaches. To
address these challenges, we present TextEE, a standardized, fair, and
reproducible benchmark for event extraction. TextEE comprises standardized data
preprocessing scripts and splits for 16 datasets spanning eight diverse domains
and includes 14 recent methodologies, conducting a comprehensive benchmark
reevaluation. We also evaluate five varied large language models on our TextEE
benchmark and demonstrate how they struggle to achieve satisfactory
performance. Inspired by our reevaluation results and findings, we discuss the
role of event extraction in the current NLP era, as well as future challenges
and insights derived from TextEE. We believe TextEE, the first standardized
comprehensive benchmarking tool, will significantly facilitate future event
extraction research. | cs.CL | TextEE: Benchmark, Reevaluation, Reflections, and Future Challenges in Event Extraction |
2023-11-16T04:29:41Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09559v3 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09559v3 | Gaurav Sahu, Olga Vechtomova, Issam H. Laradji | 2024-07-02T02:16:28Z | cs.CL, cs.AI | Semi-supervised learning (SSL) is a widely used technique in scenarios where
labeled data is scarce and unlabeled data is abundant. While SSL is popular for
image and text classification, it is relatively underexplored for the task of
extractive text summarization. Standard SSL methods follow a teacher-student
paradigm to first train a classification model and then use the classifier's
confidence values to select pseudo-labels for the subsequent training cycle;
however, such classifiers are not suitable to measure the accuracy of
pseudo-labels as they lack specific tuning for evaluation, which leads to
confidence values that fail to capture the semantics and correctness of the
generated summary. To address this problem, we propose a prompt-based
pseudo-labeling strategy with LLMs that picks unlabeled examples with more
accurate pseudo-labels than using just the classifier's probability outputs.
Our approach also includes a relabeling mechanism that improves the quality of
pseudo-labels. We evaluate our method on three text summarization datasets:
TweetSumm, WikiHow, and ArXiv/PubMed. We empirically show that a
prompting-based LLM that scores and generates pseudo-labels outperforms
existing SSL methods on ROUGE-1, ROUGE-2, and ROUGE-L scores on all the
datasets. Furthermore, our method achieves competitive L-Eval scores
(evaluation with LLaMa-3) as a fully supervised method in a data-scarce setting
and outperforms fully supervised method in a data-abundant setting. | cs.CL | Prompt-based Pseudo-labeling Strategy for Sample-Efficient Semi-Supervised Extractive Summarization |
2023-11-16T04:26:32Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09558v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09558v2 | Chaitanya Malaviya, Subin Lee, Dan Roth, Mark Yatskar | 2024-04-02T00:59:36Z | cs.CL | Eliciting feedback from end users of NLP models can be beneficial for
improving models. However, how should we present model responses to users so
they are most amenable to be corrected from user feedback? Further, what
properties do users value to understand and trust responses? We answer these
questions by analyzing the effect of rationales (or explanations) generated by
QA models to support their answers. We specifically consider decomposed QA
models that first extract an intermediate rationale based on a context and a
question and then use solely this rationale to answer the question. A rationale
outlines the approach followed by the model to answer the question. Our work
considers various formats of these rationales that vary according to
well-defined properties of interest. We sample rationales from language models
using few-shot prompting for two datasets, and then perform two user studies.
First, we present users with incorrect answers and corresponding rationales in
various formats and ask them to provide natural language feedback to revise the
rationale. We then measure the effectiveness of this feedback in patching these
rationales through in-context learning. The second study evaluates how well
different rationale formats enable users to understand and trust model answers,
when they are correct. We find that rationale formats significantly affect how
easy it is (1) for users to give feedback for rationales, and (2) for models to
subsequently execute this feedback. In addition, formats with attributions to
the context and in-depth reasoning significantly enhance user-reported
understanding and trust of model outputs. | cs.CL | What if you said that differently?: How Explanation Formats Affect Human Feedback Efficacy and User Perception |
2023-11-16T04:17:47Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09552v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09552v1 | Tariq Alhindi, Smaranda Muresan, Preslav Nakov | 2023-11-16T04:17:47Z | cs.CL | Recognizing fallacies is crucial for ensuring the quality and validity of
arguments across various domains. However, computational fallacy recognition
faces challenges due to the diverse genres, domains, and types of fallacies
found in datasets. This leads to a highly multiclass, and even multi-label,
setup with substantial class imbalance. In this study, we aim to enhance
existing models for fallacy recognition by incorporating additional context and
by leveraging large language models to generate synthetic data, thus increasing
the representation of the infrequent classes. We experiment with GPT3.5 to
generate synthetic examples and we examine the impact of prompt settings for
this. Moreover, we explore zero-shot and few-shot scenarios to evaluate the
effectiveness of using the generated examples for training smaller models
within a unified fallacy recognition framework. Furthermore, we analyze the
overlap between the synthetic data and existing fallacy datasets. Finally, we
investigate the usefulness of providing supplementary context for detecting
fallacy types that need such context, e.g., diversion fallacies. Our evaluation
results demonstrate consistent improvements across fallacy types, datasets, and
generators. | cs.CL | Large Language Models are Few-Shot Training Example Generators: A Case Study in Fallacy Recognition |
2023-11-16T04:11:19Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09550v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09550v1 | Qingyuan Li, Ran Meng, Yiduo Li, Bo Zhang, Liang Li, Yifan Lu, Xiangxiang Chu, Yerui Sun, Yuchen Xie | 2023-11-16T04:11:19Z | cs.LG, cs.CL | The large language model era urges faster and less costly inference. Prior
model compression works on LLMs tend to undertake a software-centric approach
primarily focused on the simulated quantization performance. By neglecting the
feasibility of deployment, these approaches are typically disabled in real
practice. They used to drastically push down the quantization bit range for a
reduced computation which might not be supported by the mainstream hardware, or
involve sophisticated algorithms that introduce extra computation or memory
access overhead. We argue that pursuing a hardware-centric approach in the
construction of quantization algorithms is crucial. In this regard, we are
driven to build our compression method on top of hardware awareness,
eliminating impractical algorithm choices while maximizing the benefit of
hardware acceleration. Our method, OdysseyLLM, comes with a novel W4A8 kernel
implementation called FastGEMM and a combined recipe of quantization
strategies. Extensive experiments manifest the superiority of our W4A8 method
which brings the actual speed boosting up to \textbf{4$\times$} compared to
Hugging Face FP16 inference and \textbf{2.23$\times$} vs. the state-of-the-art
inference engine TensorRT-LLM in FP16, and \textbf{1.45$\times$} vs.
TensorRT-LLM in INT8, yet without substantially harming the performance. | cs.LG | A Speed Odyssey for Deployable Quantization of LLMs |
2023-11-16T03:33:01Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09542v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09542v2 | Neha Srikanth, Rupak Sarkar, Heran Mane, Elizabeth M. Aparicio, Quynh C. Nguyen, Rachel Rudinger, Jordan Boyd-Graber | 2024-04-02T19:42:21Z | cs.CL | Questions posed by information-seeking users often contain implicit false or
potentially harmful assumptions. In a high-risk domain such as maternal and
infant health, a question-answering system must recognize these pragmatic
constraints and go beyond simply answering user questions, examining them in
context to respond helpfully. To achieve this, we study assumptions and
implications, or pragmatic inferences, made when mothers ask questions about
pregnancy and infant care by collecting a dataset of 2,727 inferences from 500
questions across three diverse sources. We study how health experts naturally
address these inferences when writing answers, and illustrate that informing
existing QA pipelines with pragmatic inferences produces responses that are
more complete, mitigating the propagation of harmful beliefs. | cs.CL | Pregnant Questions: The Importance of Pragmatic Awareness in Maternal Health Question Answering |
2023-11-16T03:28:43Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09538v3 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09538v3 | Yao Dou, Isadora Krsek, Tarek Naous, Anubha Kabra, Sauvik Das, Alan Ritter, Wei Xu | 2024-06-24T02:11:44Z | cs.CL, cs.HC | Self-disclosure, while being common and rewarding in social media
interaction, also poses privacy risks. In this paper, we take the initiative to
protect the user-side privacy associated with online self-disclosure through
detection and abstraction. We develop a taxonomy of 19 self-disclosure
categories and curate a large corpus consisting of 4.8K annotated disclosure
spans. We then fine-tune a language model for detection, achieving over 65%
partial span F$_1$. We further conduct an HCI user study, with 82% of
participants viewing the model positively, highlighting its real-world
applicability. Motivated by the user feedback, we introduce the task of
self-disclosure abstraction, which is rephrasing disclosures into less specific
terms while preserving their utility, e.g., "Im 16F" to "I'm a teenage girl".
We explore various fine-tuning strategies, and our best model can generate
diverse abstractions that moderately reduce privacy risks while maintaining
high utility according to human evaluation. To help users in deciding which
disclosures to abstract, we present a task of rating their importance for
context understanding. Our fine-tuned model achieves 80% accuracy, on-par with
GPT-3.5. Given safety and privacy considerations, we will only release our
corpus and models to researcher who agree to the ethical guidelines outlined in
Ethics Statement. | cs.CL | Reducing Privacy Risks in Online Self-Disclosures with Language Models |
2023-11-16T03:22:25Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09533v3 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09533v3 | Xi Ye, Ruoxi Sun, Sercan Ö. Arik, Tomas Pfister | 2024-04-02T20:04:01Z | cs.CL | Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable advancements in natural
language understanding and generation. However, one major issue towards their
widespread deployment in the real world is that they can generate
"hallucinated" answers that are not factual. Towards this end, this paper
focuses on improving LLMs by grounding their responses in retrieved passages
and by providing citations. We propose a new framework, AGREE, Adaptation for
GRounding EnhancEment, that improves the grounding from a holistic perspective.
Our framework tunes LLMs to selfground the claims in their responses and
provide accurate citations to retrieved documents. This tuning on top of the
pre-trained LLMs requires well-grounded responses (with citations) for paired
queries, for which we introduce a method that can automatically construct such
data from unlabeled queries. The selfgrounding capability of tuned LLMs further
grants them a test-time adaptation (TTA) capability that can actively retrieve
passages to support the claims that have not been grounded, which iteratively
improves the responses of LLMs. Across five datasets and two LLMs, our results
show that the proposed tuningbased AGREE framework generates superior grounded
responses with more accurate citations compared to prompting-based approaches
and post-hoc citing-based approaches | cs.CL | Effective Large Language Model Adaptation for Improved Grounding and Citation Generation |
2023-11-16T03:13:29Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09528v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09528v1 | Zhilin Wang, Yi Dong, Jiaqi Zeng, Virginia Adams, Makesh Narsimhan Sreedhar, Daniel Egert, Olivier Delalleau, Jane Polak Scowcroft, Neel Kant, Aidan Swope, Oleksii Kuchaiev | 2023-11-16T03:13:29Z | cs.CL, cs.AI, cs.LG | Existing open-source helpfulness preference datasets do not specify what
makes some responses more helpful and others less so. Models trained on these
datasets can incidentally learn to model dataset artifacts (e.g. preferring
longer but unhelpful responses only due to their length). To alleviate this
problem, we collect HelpSteer, a multi-attribute helpfulness dataset annotated
for the various aspects that make responses helpful. Specifically, our
37k-sample dataset has annotations for correctness, coherence, complexity, and
verbosity in addition to overall helpfulness of responses. Training Llama 2 70B
using the HelpSteer dataset with SteerLM technique produces a model that scores
7.54 on MT Bench, which is currently the highest score for open models that do
not require training data from more powerful models (e.g. GPT4). We release
this dataset with CC-BY-4.0 license at
https://huggingface.co/datasets/nvidia/HelpSteer | cs.CL | HelpSteer: Multi-attribute Helpfulness Dataset for SteerLM |
2023-11-16T02:56:29Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09521v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09521v2 | Haoyi Qiu, Kung-Hsiang Huang, Jingnong Qu, Nanyun Peng | 2024-04-02T20:46:37Z | cs.CL | Ensuring factual consistency is crucial for natural language generation
tasks, particularly in abstractive summarization, where preserving the
integrity of information is paramount. Prior works on evaluating factual
consistency of summarization often take the entailment-based approaches that
first generate perturbed (factual inconsistent) summaries and then train a
classifier on the generated data to detect the factually inconsistencies during
testing time. However, previous approaches generating perturbed summaries are
either of low coherence or lack error-type coverage. To address these issues,
we propose AMRFact, a framework that generates perturbed summaries using
Abstract Meaning Representations (AMRs). Our approach parses factually
consistent summaries into AMR graphs and injects controlled factual
inconsistencies to create negative examples, allowing for coherent factually
inconsistent summaries to be generated with high error-type coverage.
Additionally, we present a data selection module NegFilter based on natural
language inference and BARTScore to ensure the quality of the generated
negative samples. Experimental results demonstrate our approach significantly
outperforms previous systems on the AggreFact-SOTA benchmark, showcasing its
efficacy in evaluating factuality of abstractive summarization. | cs.CL | AMRFact: Enhancing Summarization Factuality Evaluation with AMR-Driven Negative Samples Generation |
2023-11-16T02:50:06Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09519v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09519v2 | Ben Bogin, Shivanshu Gupta, Peter Clark, Ashish Sabharwal | 2024-03-27T21:52:11Z | cs.CL | In-context learning (ICL) is an appealing approach for semantic parsing due
to its few-shot nature and improved generalization. However, learning to parse
to rare domain-specific languages (DSLs) from just a few demonstrations is
challenging, limiting the performance of even the most capable LLMs. In this
work, we improve the effectiveness of ICL for semantic parsing by (1) using
general-purpose programming languages such as Python instead of DSLs, and (2)
augmenting prompts with a structured domain description that includes, e.g.,
the available classes and functions. We show that both these changes
significantly improve accuracy across three popular datasets. Combined, they
lead to dramatic improvements (e.g. 7.9% to 66.5% on SMCalFlow compositional
split), nearly closing the performance gap between easier i.i.d.\ and harder
compositional splits when used with a strong model, and reducing the need for a
large number of demonstrations. We find that the resemblance of the target
parse language to general-purpose code is a more important factor than the
language's popularity in pre-training corpora. Our findings provide an improved
methodology for building semantic parsers in the modern context of ICL with
LLMs. | cs.CL | Leveraging Code to Improve In-context Learning for Semantic Parsing |
2023-11-16T02:45:47Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09517v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09517v1 | Yixiao Song, Kalpesh Krishna, Rajesh Bhatt, Kevin Gimpel, Mohit Iyyer | 2023-11-16T02:45:47Z | cs.CL | Grammatical error correction tools are effective at correcting grammatical
errors in users' input sentences but do not provide users with \textit{natural
language} explanations about their errors. Such explanations are essential for
helping users learn the language by gaining a deeper understanding of its
grammatical rules (DeKeyser, 2003; Ellis et al., 2006). To address this gap, we
propose the task of grammar error explanation, where a system needs to provide
one-sentence explanations for each grammatical error in a pair of erroneous and
corrected sentences. We analyze the capability of GPT-4 in grammar error
explanation, and find that it only produces explanations for 60.2% of the
errors using one-shot prompting. To improve upon this performance, we develop a
two-step pipeline that leverages fine-tuned and prompted large language models
to perform structured atomic token edit extraction, followed by prompting GPT-4
to generate explanations. We evaluate our pipeline on German and Chinese
grammar error correction data sampled from language learners with a wide range
of proficiency levels. Human evaluation reveals that our pipeline produces
93.9% and 98.0% correct explanations for German and Chinese data, respectively.
To encourage further research in this area, we will open-source our data and
code. | cs.CL | GEE! Grammar Error Explanation with Large Language Models |
2023-11-16T02:37:58Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09513v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09513v1 | Quinn Patwardhan, Grace Hui Yang | 2023-11-16T02:37:58Z | cs.CL | This paper contains what the Georgetown InfoSense group has done in regard to
solving the challenges presented by TREC iKAT 2023. Our submitted runs
outperform the median runs by a significant margin, exhibiting superior
performance in nDCG across various cut numbers and in overall success rate. Our
approach uses a Generate-Retrieve-Generate method, which we've found to greatly
outpace Retrieve-Then-Generate approaches for the purposes of iKAT. Our
solution involves the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) for initial answers,
answer grounding by BM25, passage quality filtering by logistic regression, and
answer generation by LLMs again. We leverage several purpose-built Language
Models, including BERT, Chat-based, and text-to-transfer-based models, for text
understanding, classification, generation, and summarization. The official
results of the TREC evaluation contradict our initial self-evaluation, which
may suggest that a decrease in the reliance on our retrieval and classification
methods is better. Nonetheless, our findings suggest that the sequence of
involving these different components matters, where we see an essentiality of
using LLMs before using search engines. | cs.CL | Sequencing Matters: A Generate-Retrieve-Generate Model for Building Conversational Agents |
2023-11-16T02:25:36Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09510v3 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09510v3 | Yash Kumar Lal, Li Zhang, Faeze Brahman, Bodhisattwa Prasad Majumder, Peter Clark, Niket Tandon | 2024-05-31T01:32:23Z | cs.CL | How-to procedures, such as how to plant a garden, are now used by millions of
users, but sometimes need customizing to meet a user's specific needs, e.g.,
planting a garden without pesticides. Our goal is to measure and improve an
LLM's ability to perform such customization. Our approach is to test several
simple multi-LLM-agent architectures for customization, as well as an
end-to-end LLM, using a new evaluation set, called CustomPlans, of over 200
WikiHow procedures each with a customization need. We find that a simple
architecture with two LLM agents used sequentially performs best, one that
edits a generic how-to procedure and one that verifies its executability,
significantly outperforming (10.5% absolute) an end-to-end prompted LLM. This
suggests that LLMs can be configured reasonably effectively for procedure
customization. This also suggests that multi-agent editing architectures may be
worth exploring further for other customization applications (e.g. coding,
creative writing) in the future. | cs.CL | Tailoring with Targeted Precision: Edit-Based Agents for Open-Domain Procedure Customization |
2023-11-16T02:05:15Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09505v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09505v1 | Yuxin Pei, Pushkar Bhuse, Zhengzhong Liu, Eric Xing | 2023-11-16T02:05:15Z | cs.CL, cs.AI, cs.LG | Interpolation-based Data Augmentation (DA) methods (Mixup) linearly
interpolate the inputs and labels of two or more training examples. Mixup has
more recently been adapted to the field of Natural Language Processing (NLP),
mainly for sequence labeling tasks. However, such a simple adoption yields
mixed or unstable improvements over the baseline models. We argue that the
direct-adoption methods do not account for structures in NLP tasks. To this
end, we propose SegMix, a collection of interpolation-based DA algorithms that
can adapt to task-specific structures. SegMix poses fewer constraints on data
structures, is robust to various hyperparameter settings, applies to more task
settings, and adds little computational overhead. In the algorithm's core, we
apply interpolation methods on task-specific meaningful segments, in contrast
to applying them on sequences as in prior work. We find SegMix to be a flexible
framework that combines rule-based DA methods with interpolation-based methods,
creating interesting mixtures of DA techniques. We show that SegMix
consistently improves performance over strong baseline models in Named Entity
Recognition (NER) and Relation Extraction (RE) tasks, especially under
data-scarce settings. Furthermore, this method is easy to implement and adds
negligible training overhead. | cs.CL | SegMix: A Simple Structure-Aware Data Augmentation Method |
2023-11-16T01:57:00Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09502v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09502v2 | Evgeniia Razumovskaia, Goran Glavaš, Anna Korhonen, Ivan Vulić | 2024-04-08T21:31:57Z | cs.CL | Task-oriented dialogue (ToD) systems help users execute well-defined tasks
across a variety of domains (e.g., $\textit{flight booking}$ or $\textit{food
ordering}$), with their Natural Language Understanding (NLU) components being
dedicated to the analysis of user utterances, predicting users' intents
($\textit{Intent Detection}$, ID) and extracting values for informational slots
($\textit{Value Extraction}$, VE). In most domains, labelled NLU data is
scarce, making sample-efficient learning -- enabled with effective transfer
paradigms -- paramount. In this work, we introduce SQATIN, a new framework for
dialog NLU based on (i) instruction tuning and (ii) question-answering-based
formulation of ID and VE tasks. According to the evaluation on established NLU
benchmarks, SQATIN sets the new state of the art in dialogue NLU, substantially
surpassing the performance of current models based on standard fine-tuning
objectives in both in-domain training and cross-domain transfer. SQATIN yields
particularly large performance gains in cross-domain transfer, owing to the
fact that our QA-based instruction tuning leverages similarities between
natural language descriptions of classes (i.e., slots and intents) across
domains. | cs.CL | SQATIN: Supervised Instruction Tuning Meets Question Answering for Improved Dialogue NLU |
2023-11-16T00:51:25Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09481v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09481v1 | Yue Guo, Joseph Chee Chang, Maria Antoniak, Erin Bransom, Trevor Cohen, Lucy Lu Wang, Tal August | 2023-11-16T00:51:25Z | cs.CL | Scientific jargon can impede researchers when they read materials from other
domains. Current methods of jargon identification mainly use corpus-level
familiarity indicators (e.g., Simple Wikipedia represents plain language).
However, researchers' familiarity of a term can vary greatly based on their own
background. We collect a dataset of over 10K term familiarity annotations from
11 computer science researchers for terms drawn from 100 paper abstracts.
Analysis of this data reveals that jargon familiarity and information needs
vary widely across annotators, even within the same sub-domain (e.g., NLP). We
investigate features representing individual, sub-domain, and domain knowledge
to predict individual jargon familiarity. We compare supervised and
prompt-based approaches, finding that prompt-based methods including personal
publications yields the highest accuracy, though zero-shot prompting provides a
strong baseline. This research offers insight into features and methods to
integrate personal data into scientific jargon identification. | cs.CL | Personalized Jargon Identification for Enhanced Interdisciplinary Communication |
2023-11-16T00:50:37Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09480v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09480v2 | Nicholas Lourie, Kyunghyun Cho, He He | 2024-04-08T18:21:53Z | cs.CL, cs.LG, stat.ML | The choice of hyperparameters greatly impacts performance in natural language
processing. Often, it is hard to tell if a method is better than another or
just better tuned. Tuning curves fix this ambiguity by accounting for tuning
effort. Specifically, they plot validation performance as a function of the
number of hyperparameter choices tried so far. While several estimators exist
for these curves, it is common to use point estimates, which we show fail
silently and give contradictory results when given too little data.
Beyond point estimates, confidence bands are necessary to rigorously
establish the relationship between different approaches. We present the first
method to construct valid confidence bands for tuning curves. The bands are
exact, simultaneous, and distribution-free, thus they provide a robust basis
for comparing methods.
Empirical analysis shows that while bootstrap confidence bands, which serve
as a baseline, fail to approximate their target confidence, ours achieve it
exactly. We validate our design with ablations, analyze the effect of sample
size, and provide guidance on comparing models with our method. To promote
confident comparisons in future work, we release opda: an easy-to-use library
that you can install with pip. https://github.com/nicholaslourie/opda | cs.CL | Show Your Work with Confidence: Confidence Bands for Tuning Curves |
2023-11-16T00:39:39Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09476v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09476v2 | Jon Saad-Falcon, Omar Khattab, Christopher Potts, Matei Zaharia | 2024-03-31T20:58:46Z | cs.CL, cs.AI, cs.IR | Evaluating retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems traditionally relies
on hand annotations for input queries, passages to retrieve, and responses to
generate. We introduce ARES, an Automated RAG Evaluation System, for evaluating
RAG systems along the dimensions of context relevance, answer faithfulness, and
answer relevance. By creating its own synthetic training data, ARES finetunes
lightweight LM judges to assess the quality of individual RAG components. To
mitigate potential prediction errors, ARES utilizes a small set of
human-annotated datapoints for prediction-powered inference (PPI). Across eight
different knowledge-intensive tasks in KILT, SuperGLUE, and AIS, ARES
accurately evaluates RAG systems while using only a few hundred human
annotations during evaluation. Furthermore, ARES judges remain effective across
domain shifts, proving accurate even after changing the type of queries and/or
documents used in the evaluated RAG systems. We make our code and datasets
publicly available on Github. | cs.CL | ARES: An Automated Evaluation Framework for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems |
2023-11-16T00:35:54Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09473v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09473v1 | Ninareh Mehrabi, Palash Goyal, Anil Ramakrishna, Jwala Dhamala, Shalini Ghosh, Richard Zemel, Kai-Wei Chang, Aram Galstyan, Rahul Gupta | 2023-11-16T00:35:54Z | cs.AI, cs.CL | With the recent surge of language models in different applications, attention
to safety and robustness of these models has gained significant importance.
Here we introduce a joint framework in which we simultaneously probe and
improve the robustness of a black-box target model via adversarial prompting
and belief augmentation using iterative feedback loops. This framework utilizes
an automated red teaming approach to probe the target model, along with a
belief augmenter to generate instructions for the target model to improve its
robustness to those adversarial probes. Importantly, the adversarial model and
the belief generator leverage the feedback from past interactions to improve
the effectiveness of the adversarial prompts and beliefs, respectively. In our
experiments, we demonstrate that such a framework can reduce toxic content
generation both in dynamic cases where an adversary directly interacts with a
target model and static cases where we use a static benchmark dataset to
evaluate our model. | cs.AI | JAB: Joint Adversarial Prompting and Belief Augmentation |
2023-11-16T00:18:50Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09469v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09469v1 | Michael J. Q. Zhang, Eunsol Choi | 2023-11-16T00:18:50Z | cs.CL | Resolving ambiguities through interaction is a hallmark of natural language,
and modeling this behavior is a core challenge in crafting AI assistants. In
this work, we study such behavior in LMs by proposing a task-agnostic framework
for resolving ambiguity by asking users clarifying questions. Our framework
breaks down this objective into three subtasks: (1) determining when
clarification is needed, (2) determining what clarifying question to ask, and
(3) responding accurately with the new information gathered through
clarification. We evaluate systems across three NLP applications: question
answering, machine translation and natural language inference. For the first
subtask, we present a novel uncertainty estimation approach, intent-sim, that
determines the utility of querying for clarification by estimating the entropy
over user intents. Our method consistently outperforms existing uncertainty
estimation approaches at identifying predictions that will benefit from
clarification. When only allowed to ask for clarification on 10% of examples,
our system is able to double the performance gains over randomly selecting
examples to clarify. Furthermore, we find that intent-sim is robust,
demonstrating improvements across a wide range of NLP tasks and LMs. Together,
our work lays foundation for studying clarifying interactions with LMs. | cs.CL | Clarify When Necessary: Resolving Ambiguity Through Interaction with LMs |
2023-11-16T00:13:19Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09467v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09467v2 | Yifu Qiu, Varun Embar, Shay B. Cohen, Benjamin Han | 2024-04-03T17:02:33Z | cs.CL, cs.AI | Knowledge-to-text generators often struggle to faithfully generate
descriptions for the input facts: they may produce hallucinations that
contradict the input, or describe facts not present in the input. To reduce
hallucinations, we propose a decoding-only method, TWEAK (Think While
Effectively Articulating Knowledge), which can be integrated with any generator
without retraining. TWEAK treats the generated sequences at each decoding step
and its future sequences as hypotheses, and ranks each generation candidate
based on the extent to which their hypotheses are supported by the input facts
using a Hypothesis Verification Model (HVM). We first demonstrate the
effectiveness of TWEAK by using a Natural Language Inference (NLI) model as the
HVM and report improved faithfulness with a minimal impact on the quality. We
then replace the NLI model with a task-specific HVM trained with a
first-of-a-kind dataset, FATE (Fact-Aligned Textual Entailment), which pairs
input facts with their original and perturbed descriptions. We test TWEAK with
two generators, and the best TWEAK variants improve on average for the two
models by 2.24/7.17 points in faithfulness (FactKB) in in/out-of-distribution
evaluations, respectively, and with only a 0.14/0.32-point decline in quality
(BERTScore). | cs.CL | Think While You Write: Hypothesis Verification Promotes Faithful Knowledge-to-Text Generation |
2023-11-15T23:52:05Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2312.00027v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.00027v2 | Yuanpu Cao, Bochuan Cao, Jinghui Chen | 2024-06-09T03:27:40Z | cs.CR, cs.AI, cs.CL | Recent developments in Large Language Models (LLMs) have manifested
significant advancements. To facilitate safeguards against malicious
exploitation, a body of research has concentrated on aligning LLMs with human
preferences and inhibiting their generation of inappropriate content.
Unfortunately, such alignments are often vulnerable: fine-tuning with a minimal
amount of harmful data can easily unalign the target LLM. While being
effective, such fine-tuning-based unalignment approaches also have their own
limitations: (1) non-stealthiness, after fine-tuning, safety audits or
red-teaming can easily expose the potential weaknesses of the unaligned models,
thereby precluding their release/use. (2) non-persistence, the unaligned LLMs
can be easily repaired through re-alignment, i.e., fine-tuning again with
aligned data points. In this work, we show that it is possible to conduct
stealthy and persistent unalignment on large language models via backdoor
injections. We also provide a novel understanding on the relationship between
the backdoor persistence and the activation pattern and further provide
guidelines for potential trigger design. Through extensive experiments, we
demonstrate that our proposed stealthy and persistent unalignment can
successfully pass the safety evaluation while maintaining strong persistence
against re-alignment defense. | cs.CR | Stealthy and Persistent Unalignment on Large Language Models via Backdoor Injections |
2023-11-15T23:50:31Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.10775v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.10775v1 | Nicholas Farn, Richard Shin | 2023-11-15T23:50:31Z | cs.CL, cs.AI, cs.LG | Large language models (LLMs) have displayed massive improvements in reasoning
and decision-making skills and can hold natural conversations with users. Many
recent works seek to augment LLM-based assistants with external tools so they
can access private or up-to-date information and carry out actions on behalf of
users. To better measure the performance of these assistants, this paper
introduces ToolTalk, a benchmark consisting of complex user intents requiring
multi-step tool usage specified through dialogue. ToolTalk contains 28 tools
grouped into 7 plugins, and includes a complete simulated implementation of
each tool, allowing for fully automated evaluation of assistants that rely on
execution feedback. ToolTalk also emphasizes tools that externally affect the
world rather than only tools for referencing or searching information. We
evaluate GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 on ToolTalk resulting in success rates of 26% and
50% respectively. Our analysis of the errors reveals three major categories and
suggests some future directions for improvement. We release ToolTalk at
https://github.com/microsoft/ToolTalk. | cs.CL | ToolTalk: Evaluating Tool-Usage in a Conversational Setting |
2023-11-15T23:47:53Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09458v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09458v1 | Prafulla Kumar Choubey, Alexander R. Fabbri, Caiming Xiong, Chien-Sheng Wu | 2023-11-15T23:47:53Z | cs.CL | Ideal summarization models should generalize to novel summary-worthy content
without remembering reference training summaries by rote. However, a single
average performance score on the entire test set is inadequate in determining
such model competencies. We propose a fine-grained evaluation protocol by
partitioning a test set based on the lexical similarity of reference test
summaries with training summaries. We observe up to a 5x (1.2x) difference in
ROUGE-2 (entity recall) scores between the subsets with the lowest and highest
similarity. Next, we show that such training repetitions also make a model
vulnerable to rote learning, reproducing data artifacts such as factual errors,
especially when reference test summaries are lexically close to training
summaries. Consequently, we propose to limit lexical repetitions in training
summaries during both supervised fine-tuning and likelihood calibration stages
to improve the performance on novel test cases while retaining average
performance. Our automatic and human evaluations on novel test subsets and
recent news articles show that limiting lexical repetitions in training
summaries can prevent rote learning and improve generalization. | cs.CL | Lexical Repetitions Lead to Rote Learning: Unveiling the Impact of Lexical Overlap in Train and Test Reference Summaries |
2023-11-15T23:36:42Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.10774v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.10774v2 | Fuxiao Liu, Xiaoyang Wang, Wenlin Yao, Jianshu Chen, Kaiqiang Song, Sangwoo Cho, Yaser Yacoob, Dong Yu | 2024-04-15T15:48:48Z | cs.CL, cs.AI | With the rapid development of large language models (LLMs) and their
integration into large multimodal models (LMMs), there has been impressive
progress in zero-shot completion of user-oriented vision-language tasks.
However, a gap remains in the domain of chart image understanding due to the
distinct abstract components in charts. To address this, we introduce a
large-scale MultiModal Chart Instruction (\textbf{MMC-Instruction}) dataset
comprising 600k instances supporting diverse tasks and chart types. Leveraging
this data, we develop MultiModal Chart Assistant (\textbf{MMCA}), an LMM that
achieves state-of-the-art performance on existing chart QA benchmarks.
Recognizing the need for a comprehensive evaluation of LMM chart understanding,
we also propose a MultiModal Chart Benchmark (\textbf{MMC-Benchmark}), a
comprehensive human-annotated benchmark with nine distinct tasks evaluating
reasoning capabilities over charts. Extensive experiments on MMC-Benchmark
reveal the limitations of existing LMMs on correctly interpreting charts, even
for the most recent GPT-4V model. Our work provides an instruction-tuning
methodology and benchmark to advance multimodal understanding of charts. Code
and data are available at https://github.com/FuxiaoLiu/MMC. | cs.CL | MMC: Advancing Multimodal Chart Understanding with Large-scale Instruction Tuning |
2023-11-15T23:33:07Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09447v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09447v2 | Lingbo Mo, Boshi Wang, Muhao Chen, Huan Sun | 2024-04-02T15:21:55Z | cs.CL, cs.AI | The rapid progress in open-source Large Language Models (LLMs) is
significantly driving AI development forward. However, there is still a limited
understanding of their trustworthiness. Deploying these models at scale without
sufficient trustworthiness can pose significant risks, highlighting the need to
uncover these issues promptly. In this work, we conduct an adversarial
assessment of open-source LLMs on trustworthiness, scrutinizing them across
eight different aspects including toxicity, stereotypes, ethics, hallucination,
fairness, sycophancy, privacy, and robustness against adversarial
demonstrations. We propose advCoU, an extended Chain of Utterances-based (CoU)
prompting strategy by incorporating carefully crafted malicious demonstrations
for trustworthiness attack. Our extensive experiments encompass recent and
representative series of open-source LLMs, including Vicuna, MPT, Falcon,
Mistral, and Llama 2. The empirical outcomes underscore the efficacy of our
attack strategy across diverse aspects. More interestingly, our result analysis
reveals that models with superior performance in general NLP tasks do not
always have greater trustworthiness; in fact, larger models can be more
vulnerable to attacks. Additionally, models that have undergone instruction
tuning, focusing on instruction following, tend to be more susceptible,
although fine-tuning LLMs for safety alignment proves effective in mitigating
adversarial trustworthiness attacks. | cs.CL | How Trustworthy are Open-Source LLMs? An Assessment under Malicious Demonstrations Shows their Vulnerabilities |
2023-11-15T23:27:19Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09443v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09443v1 | Brooklyn Sheppard, Anna Richter, Allison Cohen, Elizabeth Allyn Smith, Tamara Kneese, Carolyne Pelletier, Ioana Baldini, Yue Dong | 2023-11-15T23:27:19Z | cs.CL | Using novel approaches to dataset development, the Biasly dataset captures
the nuance and subtlety of misogyny in ways that are unique within the
literature. Built in collaboration with multi-disciplinary experts and
annotators themselves, the dataset contains annotations of movie subtitles,
capturing colloquial expressions of misogyny in North American film. The
dataset can be used for a range of NLP tasks, including classification,
severity score regression, and text generation for rewrites. In this paper, we
discuss the methodology used, analyze the annotations obtained, and provide
baselines using common NLP algorithms in the context of misogyny detection and
mitigation. We hope this work will promote AI for social good in NLP for bias
detection, explanation, and removal. | cs.CL | Subtle Misogyny Detection and Mitigation: An Expert-Annotated Dataset |
2023-11-15T23:18:01Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09438v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09438v2 | Kyle Seelman, Mozhi Zhang, Jordan Boyd-Graber | 2024-02-07T14:41:40Z | cs.LG, cs.CL, cs.HC, cs.IR | Topic models are valuable for understanding extensive document collections,
but they don't always identify the most relevant topics. Classical
probabilistic and anchor-based topic models offer interactive versions that
allow users to guide the models towards more pertinent topics. However, such
interactive features have been lacking in neural topic models. To correct this
lacuna, we introduce a user-friendly interaction for neural topic models. This
interaction permits users to assign a word label to a topic, leading to an
update in the topic model where the words in the topic become closely aligned
with the given label. Our approach encompasses two distinct kinds of neural
topic models. The first includes models where topic embeddings are trainable
and evolve during the training process. The second kind involves models where
topic embeddings are integrated post-training, offering a different approach to
topic refinement. To facilitate user interaction with these neural topic
models, we have developed an interactive interface. This interface enables
users to engage with and re-label topics as desired. We evaluate our method
through a human study, where users can relabel topics to find relevant
documents. Using our method, user labeling improves document rank scores,
helping to find more relevant documents to a given query when compared to no
user labeling. | cs.LG | Labeled Interactive Topic Models |
2023-11-15T23:07:40Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09433v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09433v2 | Haoran Wang, Kai Shu | 2023-11-24T16:22:41Z | cs.CR, cs.AI, cs.CL | To ensure AI safety, instruction-tuned Large Language Models (LLMs) are
specifically trained to ensure alignment, which refers to making models behave
in accordance with human intentions. While these models have demonstrated
commendable results on various safety benchmarks, the vulnerability of their
safety alignment has not been extensively studied. This is particularly
troubling given the potential harm that LLMs can inflict. Existing attack
methods on LLMs often rely on poisoned training data or the injection of
malicious prompts. These approaches compromise the stealthiness and
generalizability of the attacks, making them susceptible to detection.
Additionally, these models often demand substantial computational resources for
implementation, making them less practical for real-world applications.
Inspired by recent success in modifying model behavior through steering vectors
without the need for optimization, and drawing on its effectiveness in
red-teaming LLMs, we conducted experiments employing activation steering to
target four key aspects of LLMs: truthfulness, toxicity, bias, and harmfulness
- across a varied set of attack settings. To establish a universal attack
strategy applicable to diverse target alignments without depending on manual
analysis, we automatically select the intervention layer based on contrastive
layer search. Our experiment results show that activation attacks are highly
effective and add little or no overhead to attack efficiency. Additionally, we
discuss potential countermeasures against such activation attacks. Our code and
data are available at https://github.com/wang2226/Backdoor-Activation-Attack
Warning: this paper contains content that can be offensive or upsetting. | cs.CR | Backdoor Activation Attack: Attack Large Language Models using Activation Steering for Safety-Alignment |
2023-11-15T23:01:02Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09431v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09431v1 | William Brandon, Aniruddha Nrusimha, Kevin Qian, Zachary Ankner, Tian Jin, Zhiye Song, Jonathan Ragan-Kelley | 2023-11-15T23:01:02Z | cs.LG, cs.CL | To help address the growing demand for ever-longer sequence lengths in
transformer models, Liu et al. recently proposed Ring Attention, an exact
attention algorithm capable of overcoming per-device memory bottle- necks by
distributing self-attention across multiple devices. In this paper, we study
the performance characteristics of Ring Attention in the important special case
of causal transformer models, and identify a key workload imbal- ance due to
triangular structure of causal attention computations. We propose a simple
extension to Ring Attention, which we call Striped Attention to fix this
imbalance. Instead of devices having contiguous subsequences, each device has a
subset of tokens distributed uniformly throughout the sequence, which we
demonstrate leads to more even workloads. In experiments running Striped
Attention on A100 GPUs and TPUv4s, we are able to achieve up to 1.45x
end-to-end throughput improvements over the original Ring Attention algorithm
on causal transformer training at a sequence length of 256k. Furthermore, on 16
TPUv4 chips, we were able to achieve 1.65x speedups at sequence lengths of
786k. We release the code for our experiments as open source | cs.LG | Striped Attention: Faster Ring Attention for Causal Transformers |
2023-11-15T22:57:13Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09428v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09428v2 | Yueqing Liang, Lu Cheng, Ali Payani, Kai Shu | 2023-12-05T20:36:23Z | cs.CL, cs.AI, cs.CY, cs.LG | This work investigates the potential of undermining both fairness and
detection performance in abusive language detection. In a dynamic and complex
digital world, it is crucial to investigate the vulnerabilities of these
detection models to adversarial fairness attacks to improve their fairness
robustness. We propose a simple yet effective framework FABLE that leverages
backdoor attacks as they allow targeted control over the fairness and detection
performance. FABLE explores three types of trigger designs (i.e., rare,
artificial, and natural triggers) and novel sampling strategies. Specifically,
the adversary can inject triggers into samples in the minority group with the
favored outcome (i.e., "non-abusive") and flip their labels to the unfavored
outcome, i.e., "abusive". Experiments on benchmark datasets demonstrate the
effectiveness of FABLE attacking fairness and utility in abusive language
detection. | cs.CL | Beyond Detection: Unveiling Fairness Vulnerabilities in Abusive Language Models |
2023-11-15T22:43:42Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09422v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09422v1 | Yuekun Yao, Alexander Koller | 2023-11-15T22:43:42Z | cs.CL | The ability to predict an NLP model's accuracy on unseen, potentially
out-of-distribution data is a prerequisite for trustworthiness. We present a
novel model that establishes upper and lower bounds on the accuracy, without
requiring gold labels for the unseen data. We achieve this by training a
discriminator which predicts whether the output of a given sequence-to-sequence
model is correct or not. We show across a variety of tagging, parsing, and
semantic parsing tasks that the gold accuracy is reliably between the predicted
upper and lower bounds, and that these bounds are remarkably close together. | cs.CL | Predicting generalization performance with correctness discriminators |
2023-11-15T22:18:33Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09410v3 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09410v3 | Leonardo Ranaldi, Giulia Pucci | 2024-04-28T08:06:06Z | cs.CL, cs.AI | Large Language Models have been demonstrating the ability to solve complex
tasks by delivering answers that are positively evaluated by humans due in part
to the intensive use of human feedback that refines responses. However, the
suggestibility transmitted through human feedback increases the inclination to
produce responses that correspond to the users' beliefs or misleading prompts
as opposed to true facts, a behaviour known as sycophancy. This phenomenon
decreases the bias, robustness, and, consequently, their reliability. In this
paper, we shed light on the suggestibility of Large Language Models (LLMs) to
sycophantic behaviour, demonstrating these tendencies via human-influenced
prompts over different tasks. Our investigation reveals that LLMs show
sycophantic tendencies when responding to queries involving subjective opinions
and statements that should elicit a contrary response based on facts. In
contrast, when confronted with mathematical tasks or queries that have an
objective answer, these models at various scales seem not to follow the users'
hints by demonstrating confidence in delivering the correct answers. | cs.CL | When Large Language Models contradict humans? Large Language Models' Sycophantic Behaviour |
2023-11-15T22:10:42Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09406v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09406v1 | James Bernhard | 2023-11-15T22:10:42Z | cs.LG, cs.CL, cs.NE, I.2.0; I.2.7 | The transformer neural network architecture uses a form of attention in which
the dot product of query and key is divided by the square root of the key
dimension before applying softmax. This scaling of the dot product is designed
to avoid the absolute value of the dot products becoming so large that applying
softmax leads to vanishing gradients. In this paper, we propose some
alternative scalings, including dividing the dot product instead by the sum of
the key lengths before applying softmax. We use simulated keys and queries to
show that in many situations this appears to be more effective at avoiding
regions where applying softmax leads to vanishing gradients. | cs.LG | Alternatives to the Scaled Dot Product for Attention in the Transformer Neural Network Architecture |
2023-11-15T22:03:28Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09404v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09404v1 | Benedikt Ebing, Goran Glavaš | 2023-11-15T22:03:28Z | cs.CL | Perfect machine translation (MT) would render cross-lingual transfer (XLT) by
means of multilingual language models (LMs) superfluous. Given, on one hand,
the large body of work on improving XLT with multilingual LMs and, on the other
hand, recent advances in massively multilingual MT, in this work, we
systematically evaluate existing and propose new translation-based XLT
approaches for transfer to low-resource languages. We show that all
translation-based approaches dramatically outperform zero-shot XLT with
multilingual LMs, rendering the approach that combines the round-trip
translation of the source-language training data with the translation of the
target-language test instances the most effective. We next show that one can
obtain further empirical gains by adding reliable translations to other
high-resource languages to the training data. Moreover, we propose an effective
translation-based XLT strategy even for languages not supported by the MT
system. Finally, we show that model selection for XLT based on target-language
validation data obtained with MT outperforms model selection based on the
source-language data. We hope that our findings encourage adoption of more
robust translation-based baselines in XLT research. | cs.CL | To Translate or Not to Translate: A Systematic Investigation of Translation-Based Cross-Lingual Transfer to Low-Resource Languages |
2023-11-15T21:35:25Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09390v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09390v2 | Nalin Kumar, Ondřej Dušek | 2024-04-04T11:26:17Z | cs.CL | Linguistic entrainment, or alignment, represents a phenomenon where
linguistic patterns employed by conversational participants converge to one
another. While entrainment has been shown to produce a more natural user
experience, most dialogue systems do not have any provisions for it. In this
work, we introduce methods for achieving dialogue entrainment in a GPT-2-based
end-to-end task-oriented dialogue system through the utilization of shared
vocabulary. We experiment with training instance weighting,
entrainment-specific loss, and additional conditioning to generate responses
that align with the user. We demonstrate that all three approaches produce
significantly better entrainment than the base, non-entrainment-optimized
model, as confirmed by both automated and manual evaluation metrics. | cs.CL | LEEETs-Dial: Linguistic Entrainment in End-to-End Task-oriented Dialogue systems |
2023-11-15T21:32:44Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09389v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09389v1 | Jonas Vestergaard Jensen, Mikkel Jordahn, Michael Riis Andersen | 2023-11-15T21:32:44Z | cs.CL, cs.LG, I.2.7 | In this work, we address the problem of assessing and constructing feedback
for early-stage writing automatically using machine learning. Early-stage
writing is typically vastly different from conventional writing due to phonetic
spelling and lack of proper grammar, punctuation, spacing etc. Consequently,
early-stage writing is highly non-trivial to analyze using common linguistic
metrics. We propose to use sequence-to-sequence models for "translating"
early-stage writing by students into "conventional" writing, which allows the
translated text to be analyzed using linguistic metrics. Furthermore, we
propose a novel robust likelihood to mitigate the effect of noise in the
dataset. We investigate the proposed methods using a set of numerical
experiments and demonstrate that the conventional text can be predicted with
high accuracy. | cs.CL | Neural machine translation for automated feedback on children's early-stage writing |
2023-11-15T21:30:26Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09387v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09387v2 | Joshua Maher | 2023-11-21T18:31:57Z | cs.LG, cs.CL, cs.DS | We introduce a new construction of embeddings of arbitrary recursive data
structures into high dimensional vectors. These embeddings provide an
interpretable model for the latent state vectors of transformers. We
demonstrate that these embeddings can be decoded to the original data structure
when the embedding dimension is sufficiently large. This decoding algorithm has
a natural implementation as a transformer. We also show that these embedding
vectors can be manipulated directly to perform computations on the underlying
data without decoding. As an example we present an algorithm that constructs
the embedded parse tree of an embedded token sequence using only vector
operations in embedding space. | cs.LG | Banach-Tarski Embeddings and Transformers |
2023-11-15T21:25:15Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.10112v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.10112v2 | Zifeng Ding, Heling Cai, Jingpei Wu, Yunpu Ma, Ruotong Liao, Bo Xiong, Volker Tresp | 2024-03-15T15:38:07Z | cs.AI, cs.CL, cs.LG | Modeling evolving knowledge over temporal knowledge graphs (TKGs) has become
a heated topic. Various methods have been proposed to forecast links on TKGs.
Most of them are embedding-based, where hidden representations are learned to
represent knowledge graph (KG) entities and relations based on the observed
graph contexts. Although these methods show strong performance on traditional
TKG forecasting (TKGF) benchmarks, they face a strong challenge in modeling the
unseen zero-shot relations that have no prior graph context. In this paper, we
try to mitigate this problem as follows. We first input the text descriptions
of KG relations into large language models (LLMs) for generating relation
representations, and then introduce them into embedding-based TKGF methods.
LLM-empowered representations can capture the semantic information in the
relation descriptions. This makes the relations, whether seen or unseen, with
similar semantic meanings stay close in the embedding space, enabling TKGF
models to recognize zero-shot relations even without any observed graph
context. Experimental results show that our approach helps TKGF models to
achieve much better performance in forecasting the facts with previously unseen
relations, while still maintaining their ability in link forecasting regarding
seen relations. | cs.AI | zrLLM: Zero-Shot Relational Learning on Temporal Knowledge Graphs with Large Language Models |
2023-11-15T21:22:27Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09383v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09383v1 | Pritom Saha Akash, Kashob Kumar Roy, Lucian Popa, Kevin Chen-Chuan Chang | 2023-11-15T21:22:27Z | cs.CL, cs.LG | Long-form question answering (LFQA) poses a challenge as it involves
generating detailed answers in the form of paragraphs, which go beyond simple
yes/no responses or short factual answers. While existing QA models excel in
questions with concise answers, LFQA requires handling multiple topics and
their intricate relationships, demanding comprehensive explanations. Previous
attempts at LFQA focused on generating long-form answers by utilizing relevant
contexts from a corpus, relying solely on the question itself. However, they
overlooked the possibility that the question alone might not provide sufficient
information to identify the relevant contexts. Additionally, generating
detailed long-form answers often entails aggregating knowledge from diverse
sources. To address these limitations, we propose an LFQA model with iterative
Planning, Retrieval, and Generation. This iterative process continues until a
complete answer is generated for the given question. From an extensive
experiment on both an open domain and a technical domain QA dataset, we find
that our model outperforms the state-of-the-art models on various textual and
factual metrics for the LFQA task. | cs.CL | Long-form Question Answering: An Iterative Planning-Retrieval-Generation Approach |
2023-11-15T20:59:13Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09367v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09367v1 | Swapnil Mane, Suman Kundu, Rajesh Sharma | 2023-11-15T20:59:13Z | cs.CL | The rise of social media platforms has led to an increase in cyber-aggressive
behavior, encompassing a broad spectrum of hostile behavior, including
cyberbullying, online harassment, and the dissemination of offensive and hate
speech. These behaviors have been associated with significant societal
consequences, ranging from online anonymity to real-world outcomes such as
depression, suicidal tendencies, and, in some instances, offline violence.
Recognizing the societal risks associated with unchecked aggressive content,
this paper delves into the field of Aggression Content Detection and Behavioral
Analysis of Aggressive Users, aiming to bridge the gap between disparate
studies. In this paper, we analyzed the diversity of definitions and proposed a
unified cyber-aggression definition. We examine the comprehensive process of
Aggression Content Detection, spanning from dataset creation, feature selection
and extraction, and detection algorithm development. Further, we review studies
on Behavioral Analysis of Aggression that explore the influencing factors,
consequences, and patterns associated with cyber-aggressive behavior. This
systematic literature review is a cross-examination of content detection and
behavioral analysis in the realm of cyber-aggression. The integrated
investigation reveals the effectiveness of incorporating sociological insights
into computational techniques for preventing cyber-aggressive behavior.
Finally, the paper concludes by identifying research gaps and encouraging
further progress in the unified domain of socio-computational aggressive
behavior analysis. | cs.CL | A Survey on Online User Aggression: Content Detection and Behavioural Analysis on Social Media Platforms |
2023-11-15T20:57:44Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09366v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09366v1 | Jamie McCusker | 2023-11-15T20:57:44Z | cs.CL, cs.AI | While the potential of Open Information Extraction (Open IE) for Knowledge
Graph Construction (KGC) may seem promising, we find that the alignment of Open
IE extraction results with existing knowledge graphs to be inadequate. The
advent of Large Language Models (LLMs), especially the commercially available
OpenAI models, have reset expectations for what is possible with deep learning
models and have created a new field called prompt engineering. We investigate
the use of GPT models and prompt engineering for knowledge graph construction
with the Wikidata knowledge graph to address a similar problem to Open IE,
which we call Open Knowledge Extraction (OKE) using an approach we call the
Linked Open Knowledge Extractor (LOKE, pronounced like "Loki"). We consider the
entity linking task essential to construction of real world knowledge graphs.
We merge the CaRB benchmark scoring approach with data from the TekGen dataset
for the LOKE task. We then show that a well engineered prompt, paired with a
naive entity linking approach (which we call LOKE-GPT), outperforms AllenAI's
OpenIE 4 implementation on the OKE task, although it over-generates triples
compared to the reference set due to overall triple scarcity in the TekGen set.
Through an analysis of entity linkability in the CaRB dataset, as well as
outputs from OpenIE 4 and LOKE-GPT, we see that LOKE-GPT and the "silver"
TekGen triples show that the task is significantly different in content from
OIE, if not structure. Through this analysis and a qualitative analysis of
sentence extractions via all methods, we found that LOKE-GPT extractions are of
high utility for the KGC task and suitable for use in semi-automated extraction
settings. | cs.CL | LOKE: Linked Open Knowledge Extraction for Automated Knowledge Graph Construction |
2023-11-15T20:52:56Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09363v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09363v2 | Rao Ma, Adian Liusie, Mark J. F. Gales, Kate M. Knill | 2024-03-28T16:31:26Z | cs.CL | Text and vision foundation models can perform many tasks in a zero-shot
setting, a desirable property that enables these systems to be applied in
general and low-resource settings. There has been far less work, however, on
the zero-shot abilities of ASR foundation models, with these systems typically
fine-tuned to specific tasks or constrained to applications that match their
training criterion and data annotation. In this work we investigate the ability
of Whisper and MMS, ASR foundation models trained primarily for speech
recognition, to perform zero-shot audio classification. We use simple
template-based text prompts at the decoder and use the resulting decoding
probabilities to generate zero-shot predictions. Without training the model on
extra data or adding any new parameters, we demonstrate that Whisper shows
promising zero-shot classification performance on a range of 8
audio-classification datasets, outperforming the accuracy of existing
state-of-the-art zero-shot baselines by an average of 9%. One important step to
unlock the emergent ability is debiasing, where a simple unsupervised
reweighting method of the class probabilities yields consistent significant
performance gains. We further show that performance increases with model size,
implying that as ASR foundation models scale up, they may exhibit improved
zero-shot performance. | cs.CL | Investigating the Emergent Audio Classification Ability of ASR Foundation Models |
2023-11-15T20:42:11Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09358v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09358v1 | Sridevi Wagle, Sai Munikoti, Anurag Acharya, Sara Smith, Sameera Horawalavithana | 2023-11-15T20:42:11Z | cs.CL, cs.AI, I.2.7 | Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable achievements in natural
language processing tasks, producing high-quality outputs. However, LLMs still
exhibit limitations, including the generation of factually incorrect
information. In safety-critical applications, it is important to assess the
confidence of LLM-generated content to make informed decisions. Retrieval
Augmented Language Models (RALMs) is relatively a new area of research in NLP.
RALMs offer potential benefits for scientific NLP tasks, as retrieved
documents, can serve as evidence to support model-generated content. This
inclusion of evidence enhances trustworthiness, as users can verify and explore
the retrieved documents to validate model outputs. Quantifying uncertainty in
RALM generations further improves trustworthiness, with retrieved text and
confidence scores contributing to a comprehensive and reliable model for
scientific applications. However, there is limited to no research on UQ for
RALMs, particularly in scientific contexts. This study aims to address this gap
by conducting a comprehensive evaluation of UQ in RALMs, focusing on scientific
tasks. This research investigates how uncertainty scores vary when scientific
knowledge is incorporated as pretraining and retrieval data and explores the
relationship between uncertainty scores and the accuracy of model-generated
outputs. We observe that an existing RALM finetuned with scientific knowledge
as the retrieval data tends to be more confident in generating predictions
compared to the model pretrained only with scientific knowledge. We also found
that RALMs are overconfident in their predictions, making inaccurate
predictions more confidently than accurate ones. Scientific knowledge provided
either as pretraining or retrieval corpus does not help alleviate this issue.
We released our code, data and dashboards at https://github.com/pnnl/EXPERT2. | cs.CL | Empirical evaluation of Uncertainty Quantification in Retrieval-Augmented Language Models for Science |
2023-11-15T20:33:27Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09356v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09356v1 | Robert Mahari, Dominik Stammbach, Elliott Ash, Alex `Sandy' Pentland | 2023-11-15T20:33:27Z | cs.CL | We present the Legal Passage Retrieval Dataset LePaRD. LePaRD is a massive
collection of U.S. federal judicial citations to precedent in context. The
dataset aims to facilitate work on legal passage prediction, a challenging
practice-oriented legal retrieval and reasoning task. Legal passage prediction
seeks to predict relevant passages from precedential court decisions given the
context of a legal argument. We extensively evaluate various retrieval
approaches on LePaRD, and find that classification appears to work best.
However, we note that legal precedent prediction is a difficult task, and there
remains significant room for improvement. We hope that by publishing LePaRD, we
will encourage others to engage with a legal NLP task that promises to help
expand access to justice by reducing the burden associated with legal research.
A subset of the LePaRD dataset is freely available and the whole dataset will
be released upon publication. | cs.CL | LePaRD: A Large-Scale Dataset of Judges Citing Precedents |
2023-11-15T20:04:58Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09344v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09344v1 | Alexandra Chronopoulou, Jonas Pfeiffer, Joshua Maynez, Xinyi Wang, Sebastian Ruder, Priyanka Agrawal | 2023-11-15T20:04:58Z | cs.CL | Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) using labeled task data can
significantly improve the performance of large language models (LLMs) on the
downstream task. However, there are 7000 languages in the world and many of
these languages lack labeled data for real-world language generation tasks. In
this paper, we propose to improve zero-shot cross-lingual transfer by composing
language or task specialized parameters. Our method composes language and task
PEFT modules via element-wise arithmetic operations to leverage unlabeled data
and English labeled data. We extend our approach to cases where labeled data
from more languages is available and propose to arithmetically compose PEFT
modules trained on languages related to the target. Empirical results on
summarization demonstrate that our method is an effective strategy that obtains
consistent gains using minimal training of PEFT modules. | cs.CL | Language and Task Arithmetic with Parameter-Efficient Layers for Zero-Shot Summarization |
2023-11-15T19:52:11Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09336v3 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09336v3 | Wenda Xu, Daniel Deutsch, Mara Finkelstein, Juraj Juraska, Biao Zhang, Zhongtao Liu, William Yang Wang, Lei Li, Markus Freitag | 2024-04-02T16:39:13Z | cs.CL | Recent large language models (LLM) are leveraging human feedback to improve
their generation quality. However, human feedback is costly to obtain,
especially during inference. In this work, we propose LLMRefine, an inference
time optimization method to refine LLM's output. The core idea is to use a
learned fine-grained feedback model to pinpoint defects and guide LLM to refine
them iteratively. Using original LLM as a proposal of edits, LLMRefine searches
for defect-less text via simulated annealing, trading off the exploration and
exploitation. We conduct experiments on three text generation tasks, including
machine translation, long-form question answering (QA), and topical
summarization. LLMRefine consistently outperforms all baseline approaches,
achieving improvements up to 1.7 MetricX points on translation tasks, 8.1
ROUGE-L on ASQA, 2.2 ROUGE-L on topical summarization. | cs.CL | LLMRefine: Pinpointing and Refining Large Language Models via Fine-Grained Actionable Feedback |
2023-11-15T19:51:57Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.10111v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.10111v1 | Hritik Bansal, Yonatan Bitton, Idan Szpektor, Kai-Wei Chang, Aditya Grover | 2023-11-15T19:51:57Z | cs.CV, cs.AI, cs.CL, cs.LG | Despite being (pre)trained on a massive amount of data, state-of-the-art
video-language alignment models are not robust to semantically-plausible
contrastive changes in the video captions. Our work addresses this by
identifying a broad spectrum of contrast misalignments, such as replacing
entities, actions, and flipping event order, which alignment models should be
robust against. To this end, we introduce the VideoCon, a video-language
alignment dataset constructed by a large language model that generates
plausible contrast video captions and explanations for differences between
original and contrast video captions. Then, a generative video-language model
is finetuned with VideoCon to assess video-language entailment and generate
explanations. Our VideoCon-based alignment model significantly outperforms
current models. It exhibits a 12-point increase in AUC for the video-language
alignment task on human-generated contrast captions. Finally, our model sets
new state of the art zero-shot performance in temporally-extensive
video-language tasks such as text-to-video retrieval (SSv2-Temporal) and video
question answering (ATP-Hard). Moreover, our model shows superior performance
on novel videos and human-crafted captions and explanations. Our code and data
are available at https://github.com/Hritikbansal/videocon. | cs.CV | VideoCon: Robust Video-Language Alignment via Contrast Captions |
2023-11-15T19:49:24Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09335v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09335v2 | George Chrysostomou, Zhixue Zhao, Miles Williams, Nikolaos Aletras | 2024-01-29T17:59:30Z | cs.CL, cs.AI | Despite the remarkable performance of generative large language models (LLMs)
on abstractive summarization, they face two significant challenges: their
considerable size and tendency to hallucinate. Hallucinations are concerning
because they erode reliability and raise safety issues. Pruning is a technique
that reduces model size by removing redundant weights, enabling more efficient
sparse inference. Pruned models yield downstream task performance comparable to
the original, making them ideal alternatives when operating on a limited
budget. However, the effect that pruning has upon hallucinations in abstractive
summarization with LLMs has yet to be explored. In this paper, we provide an
extensive empirical study across five summarization datasets, two
state-of-the-art pruning methods, and five instruction-tuned LLMs.
Surprisingly, we find that hallucinations from pruned LLMs are less prevalent
than the original models. Our analysis suggests that pruned models tend to
depend more on the source document for summary generation. This leads to a
higher lexical overlap between the generated summary and the source document,
which could be a reason for the reduction in hallucination risk. | cs.CL | Investigating Hallucinations in Pruned Large Language Models for Abstractive Summarization |
2023-11-15T19:34:06Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09325v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09325v2 | Tong Liu, Iza Škrjanec, Vera Demberg | 2024-07-03T16:12:32Z | cs.CL, cs.AI | A wide body of evidence shows that human language processing difficulty is
predicted by the information-theoretic measure surprisal, a word's negative log
probability in context. However, it is still unclear how to best estimate these
probabilities needed for predicting human processing difficulty -- while a
long-standing belief held that models with lower perplexity would provide more
accurate estimates of word predictability, and therefore lead to better reading
time predictions, recent work has shown that for very large models,
psycholinguistic predictive power decreases. One reason could be that language
models might be more confident of their predictions than humans, because they
have had exposure to several magnitudes more data. In this paper, we test what
effect temperature-scaling of large language model (LLM) predictions has on
surprisal estimates and their predictive power of reading times of English
texts. Firstly, we show that calibration of large language models typically
improves with model size, i.e. poorer calibration cannot account for poorer fit
to reading times. Secondly, we find that temperature-scaling probabilities lead
to a systematically better fit to reading times (up to 89% improvement in delta
log likelihood), across several reading time corpora. Finally, we show that
this improvement in fit is chiefly driven by words that are composed of
multiple subword tokens. | cs.CL | Temperature-scaling surprisal estimates improve fit to human reading times -- but does it do so for the "right reasons"? |
2023-11-15T19:25:29Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09319v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09319v2 | Mohammad Amaan Sayeed, Hanan Aldarmaki | 2024-07-01T21:08:18Z | cs.CL, cs.AI | Text word embeddings that encode distributional semantics work by modeling
contextual similarities of frequently occurring words. Acoustic word
embeddings, on the other hand, typically encode low-level phonetic
similarities. Semantic embeddings for spoken words have been previously
explored using analogous algorithms to Word2Vec, but the resulting vectors
still mainly encoded phonetic rather than semantic features. In this paper, we
examine the assumptions and architectures used in previous works and show
experimentally how shallow skipgram-like algorithms fail to encode
distributional semantics when the input units are acoustically correlated. We
illustrate the potential of an alternative deep end-to-end variant of the model
and examine the effects on the resulting embeddings, showing positive results
of semantic relatedness in the embedding space. | cs.CL | Spoken Word2Vec: Learning Skipgram Embeddings from Speech |
2023-11-15T19:24:54Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.10771v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.10771v2 | Sara Shatnawi, Sawsan Alqahtani, Hanan Aldarmaki | 2024-04-07T00:48:10Z | cs.CL, cs.SD | Automatic text-based diacritic restoration models generally have high
diacritic error rates when applied to speech transcripts as a result of domain
and style shifts in spoken language. In this work, we explore the possibility
of improving the performance of automatic diacritic restoration when applied to
speech data by utilizing parallel spoken utterances. In particular, we use the
pre-trained Whisper ASR model fine-tuned on relatively small amounts of
diacritized Arabic speech data to produce rough diacritized transcripts for the
speech utterances, which we then use as an additional input for diacritic
restoration models. The proposed framework consistently improves diacritic
restoration performance compared to text-only baselines. Our results highlight
the inadequacy of current text-based diacritic restoration models for speech
data sets and provide a new baseline for speech-based diacritic restoration. | cs.CL | Automatic Restoration of Diacritics for Speech Data Sets |
2023-11-15T19:02:40Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09308v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09308v2 | Yuchen Zhou, Emmy Liu, Graham Neubig, Michael J. Tarr, Leila Wehbe | 2024-02-05T02:21:59Z | cs.CL, cs.AI, cs.LG, q-bio.NC | Do machines and humans process language in similar ways? Recent research has
hinted in the affirmative, finding that brain signals can be effectively
predicted using the internal representations of language models (LMs). Although
such results are thought to reflect shared computational principles between LMs
and human brains, there are also clear differences in how LMs and humans
represent and use language. In this work, we systematically explore the
divergences between human and machine language processing by examining the
differences between LM representations and human brain responses to language as
measured by Magnetoencephalography (MEG) across two datasets in which subjects
read and listened to narrative stories. Using a data-driven approach, we
identify two domains that are not captured well by LMs: social/emotional
intelligence and physical commonsense. We then validate these domains with
human behavioral experiments and show that fine-tuning LMs on these domains can
improve their alignment with human brain responses. | cs.CL | Divergences between Language Models and Human Brains |
2023-11-15T18:59:56Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09278v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09278v2 | Fangzhi Xu, Zhiyong Wu, Qiushi Sun, Siyu Ren, Fei Yuan, Shuai Yuan, Qika Lin, Yu Qiao, Jun Liu | 2024-02-18T06:24:12Z | cs.CL, cs.AI | Although Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate remarkable ability in
processing and generating human-like text, they do have limitations when it
comes to comprehending and expressing world knowledge that extends beyond the
boundaries of natural language(e.g., chemical molecular formula). Injecting a
collection of symbolic data directly into the training of LLMs can be
problematic, as it disregards the synergies among different symbolic families
and overlooks the need for a balanced mixture of natural and symbolic data. In
this work, we tackle these challenges from both a data and framework
perspective and introduce Symbol-LLM series models. First, we curated a data
collection consisting of 34 tasks and incorporating approximately 20 distinct
symbolic families, intending to capture the interrelations and foster synergies
between symbols. Then, a two-stage tuning framework succeeds in injecting
symbolic knowledge without loss of the generality ability. Extensive
experiments on both symbol- and NL-centric tasks demonstrate the balanced and
superior performances of Symbol-LLM series models. The project page is
https://xufangzhi.github.io/symbol-llm-page/. | cs.CL | Symbol-LLM: Towards Foundational Symbol-centric Interface For Large Language Models |
2023-11-15T18:58:19Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09216v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09216v1 | Vandan Mujadia, Ashok Urlana, Yash Bhaskar, Penumalla Aditya Pavani, Kukkapalli Shravya, Parameswari Krishnamurthy, Dipti Misra Sharma | 2023-11-15T18:58:19Z | cs.CL, cs.AI | Generative Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable advancements
in various NLP tasks. In this work, our aim is to explore the multilingual
capabilities of large language models by using machine translation as a task
involving English and 22 Indian languages. We first investigate the translation
capabilities of raw large language models, followed by exploring the in-context
learning capabilities of the same raw models. We fine-tune these large language
models using parameter efficient fine-tuning methods such as LoRA and
additionally with full fine-tuning. Through our study, we have identified the
best performing large language model for the translation task involving LLMs,
which is based on LLaMA.
Our results demonstrate significant progress, with average BLEU scores of
13.42, 15.93, 12.13, 12.30, and 12.07, as well as CHRF scores of 43.98, 46.99,
42.55, 42.42, and 45.39, respectively, using 2-stage fine-tuned LLaMA-13b for
English to Indian languages on IN22 (conversational), IN22 (general),
flores200-dev, flores200-devtest, and newstest2019 testsets. Similarly, for
Indian languages to English, we achieved average BLEU scores of 14.03, 16.65,
16.17, 15.35 and 12.55 along with chrF scores of 36.71, 40.44, 40.26, 39.51,
and 36.20, respectively, using fine-tuned LLaMA-13b on IN22 (conversational),
IN22 (general), flores200-dev, flores200-devtest, and newstest2019 testsets.
Overall, our findings highlight the potential and strength of large language
models for machine translation capabilities, including for languages that are
currently underrepresented in LLMs. | cs.CL | Assessing Translation capabilities of Large Language Models involving English and Indian Languages |
2023-11-15T18:56:23Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09214v3 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09214v3 | Weize Liu, Guocong Li, Kai Zhang, Bang Du, Qiyuan Chen, Xuming Hu, Hongxia Xu, Jintai Chen, Jian Wu | 2024-04-07T19:17:53Z | cs.CL | Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable advancements in natural
language processing. However, the massive scale and computational demands of
these models present formidable challenges when considering their practical
deployment in resource-constrained environments. While techniques such as
chain-of-thought (CoT) distillation have displayed promise in distilling LLMs
into small language models (SLMs), there is a risk that distilled SLMs may
still inherit flawed reasoning and hallucinations from LLMs. To address these
issues, we propose a twofold methodology: First, we introduce a novel method
for distilling the self-evaluation capability from LLMs into SLMs, aiming to
mitigate the adverse effects of flawed reasoning and hallucinations inherited
from LLMs. Second, we advocate for distilling more comprehensive thinking by
incorporating multiple distinct CoTs and self-evaluation outputs, to ensure a
more thorough and robust knowledge transfer into SLMs. Experiments on three NLP
benchmarks demonstrate that our method significantly improves the performance
of distilled SLMs, offering a new perspective for developing more effective and
efficient SLMs in resource-constrained environments. | cs.CL | Mind's Mirror: Distilling Self-Evaluation Capability and Comprehensive Thinking from Large Language Models |
2023-11-15T18:55:45Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09213v3 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09213v3 | Jorge Leandro, Sudha Rao, Michael Xu, Weijia Xu, Nebosja Jojic, Chris Brockett, Bill Dolan | 2024-06-05T20:59:27Z | cs.CL | Dialogue-based Role Playing Games (RPGs) require powerful storytelling. The
narratives of these may take years to write and typically involve a large
creative team. In this work, we demonstrate the potential of large generative
text models to assist this process. \textbf{GENEVA}, a prototype tool,
generates a rich narrative graph with branching and reconverging storylines
that match a high-level narrative description and constraints provided by the
designer. A large language model (LLM), GPT-4, is used to generate the
branching narrative and to render it in a graph format in a two-step process.
We illustrate the use of GENEVA in generating new branching narratives for four
well-known stories under different contextual constraints. This tool has the
potential to assist in game development, simulations, and other applications
with game-like properties. | cs.CL | GENEVA: GENErating and Visualizing branching narratives using LLMs |
2023-11-15T18:55:43Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09212v3 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09212v3 | Ashok Urlana, Pruthwik Mishra, Tathagato Roy, Rahul Mishra | 2024-05-28T02:04:50Z | cs.CL, cs.AI, I.2.7 | Generic text summarization approaches often fail to address the specific
intent and needs of individual users. Recently, scholarly attention has turned
to the development of summarization methods that are more closely tailored and
controlled to align with specific objectives and user needs. Despite a growing
corpus of controllable summarization research, there is no comprehensive survey
available that thoroughly explores the diverse controllable attributes employed
in this context, delves into the associated challenges, and investigates the
existing solutions. In this survey, we formalize the Controllable Text
Summarization (CTS) task, categorize controllable attributes according to their
shared characteristics and objectives, and present a thorough examination of
existing datasets and methods within each category. Moreover, based on our
findings, we uncover limitations and research gaps, while also exploring
potential solutions and future directions for CTS. We release our detailed
analysis of CTS papers at
https://github.com/ashokurlana/controllable_text_summarization_survey. | cs.CL | Controllable Text Summarization: Unraveling Challenges, Approaches, and Prospects -- A Survey |
2023-11-15T18:54:53Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09210v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09210v1 | Wenhao Yu, Hongming Zhang, Xiaoman Pan, Kaixin Ma, Hongwei Wang, Dong Yu | 2023-11-15T18:54:53Z | cs.CL, cs.AI | Retrieval-augmented language models (RALMs) represent a substantial
advancement in the capabilities of large language models, notably in reducing
factual hallucination by leveraging external knowledge sources. However, the
reliability of the retrieved information is not always guaranteed. The
retrieval of irrelevant data can lead to misguided responses, and potentially
causing the model to overlook its inherent knowledge, even when it possesses
adequate information to address the query. Moreover, standard RALMs often
struggle to assess whether they possess adequate knowledge, both intrinsic and
retrieved, to provide an accurate answer. In situations where knowledge is
lacking, these systems should ideally respond with "unknown" when the answer is
unattainable. In response to these challenges, we introduces Chain-of-Noting
(CoN), a novel approach aimed at improving the robustness of RALMs in facing
noisy, irrelevant documents and in handling unknown scenarios. The core idea of
CoN is to generate sequential reading notes for retrieved documents, enabling a
thorough evaluation of their relevance to the given question and integrating
this information to formulate the final answer. We employed ChatGPT to create
training data for CoN, which was subsequently trained on an LLaMa-2 7B model.
Our experiments across four open-domain QA benchmarks show that RALMs equipped
with CoN significantly outperform standard RALMs. Notably, CoN achieves an
average improvement of +7.9 in EM score given entirely noisy retrieved
documents and +10.5 in rejection rates for real-time questions that fall
outside the pre-training knowledge scope. | cs.CL | Chain-of-Note: Enhancing Robustness in Retrieval-Augmented Language Models |
2023-11-15T18:54:01Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09277v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09277v1 | Yew Ken Chia, Guizhen Chen, Luu Anh Tuan, Soujanya Poria, Lidong Bing | 2023-11-15T18:54:01Z | cs.CL | Despite the success of chain of thought in enhancing language model
reasoning, the underlying process remains less well understood. Although
logically sound reasoning appears inherently crucial for chain of thought,
prior studies surprisingly reveal minimal impact when using invalid
demonstrations instead. Furthermore, the conventional chain of thought does not
inform language models on what mistakes to avoid, which potentially leads to
more errors. Hence, inspired by how humans can learn from both positive and
negative examples, we propose contrastive chain of thought to enhance language
model reasoning. Compared to the conventional chain of thought, our approach
provides both valid and invalid reasoning demonstrations, to guide the model to
reason step-by-step while reducing reasoning mistakes. To improve
generalization, we introduce an automatic method to construct contrastive
demonstrations. Our experiments on reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that
contrastive chain of thought can serve as a general enhancement of
chain-of-thought prompting. | cs.CL | Contrastive Chain-of-Thought Prompting |
2023-11-15T18:47:52Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.09206v3 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09206v3 | Tianshu Zhang, Xiang Yue, Yifei Li, Huan Sun | 2024-04-04T17:10:25Z | cs.CL, cs.AI, cs.DB | Semi-structured tables are ubiquitous. There has been a variety of tasks that
aim to automatically interpret, augment, and query tables. Current methods
often require pretraining on tables or special model architecture design, are
restricted to specific table types, or have simplifying assumptions about
tables and tasks. This paper makes the first step towards developing
open-source large language models (LLMs) as generalists for a diversity of
table-based tasks. Towards that end, we construct TableInstruct, a new dataset
with a variety of realistic tables and tasks, for instruction tuning and
evaluating LLMs. We further develop the first open-source generalist model for
tables, TableLlama, by fine-tuning Llama 2 (7B) with LongLoRA to address the
long context challenge. We experiment under both in-domain setting and
out-of-domain setting. On 7 out of 8 in-domain tasks, TableLlama achieves
comparable or better performance than the SOTA for each task, despite the
latter often has task-specific design. On 6 out-of-domain datasets, it achieves
5-44 absolute point gains compared with the base model, showing that training
on TableInstruct enhances the model's generalizability. We open-source our
dataset and trained model to boost future work on developing open generalist
models for tables. | cs.CL | TableLlama: Towards Open Large Generalist Models for Tables |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.