publication_date
stringlengths 20
20
| doc_url
stringlengths 33
34
| id
stringlengths 33
34
| authors
stringlengths 5
20.1k
| update_date
stringlengths 20
20
| category_all
stringlengths 5
138
| abstract
stringlengths 123
3.09k
| category_primary
stringclasses 78
values | title
stringlengths 10
211
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2023-05-24T06:23:02Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14772v3 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14772v3 | Benjamin Newman, Luca Soldaini, Raymond Fok, Arman Cohan, Kyle Lo | 2023-12-01T00:11:04Z | cs.CL | Many real-world applications (e.g., note taking, search) require extracting a
sentence or paragraph from a document and showing that snippet to a human
outside of the source document. Yet, users may find snippets difficult to
understand as they lack context from the original document. In this work, we
use language models to rewrite snippets from scientific documents to be read on
their own. First, we define the requirements and challenges for this
user-facing decontextualization task, such as clarifying where edits occur and
handling references to other documents. Second, we propose a framework that
decomposes the task into three stages: question generation, question answering,
and rewriting. Using this framework, we collect gold decontextualizations from
experienced scientific article readers. We then conduct a range of experiments
across state-of-the-art commercial and open-source language models to identify
how to best provide missing-but-relevant information to models for our task.
Finally, we develop QaDecontext, a simple prompting strategy inspired by our
framework that improves over end-to-end prompting. We conclude with analysis
that finds, while rewriting is easy, question generation and answering remain
challenging for today's models. | cs.CL | A Question Answering Framework for Decontextualizing User-facing Snippets from Scientific Documents |
2023-05-24T06:22:14Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14771v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14771v2 | Xiaochuang Han, Sachin Kumar, Yulia Tsvetkov, Marjan Ghazvininejad | 2024-02-14T17:45:41Z | cs.CL | Diffusion-based language models are emerging as a promising alternative to
autoregressive LMs: they approach the competence of autoregressive LMs while
offering nuanced controllability at inference time. While autoregressive LMs
have benefited immensely from scaling and instruction-based learning, existing
studies of diffusion LMs have been conducted on a smaller scale. Starting with
a recently proposed diffusion model SSD-LM, in this work we first explore
methods to scale it from 0.4B to 13B parameters, proposing techniques to
improve its training and inference efficiency, and to finetune the model to
follow instructions. Armed with a more powerful, general purpose diffusion LM,
we introduce the primary contribution of this work -- SSD-2 -- an approach to
easily ensemble at inference time a large general-purpose diffusion LM with
smaller, but specialized and contextualized diffusion LMs. We show that SSD-2
facilitates novel ensembles with 100x smaller models that can be customized and
deployed by individual users. We find that compared to autoregressive models,
the collaboration between diffusion LMs is more effective, leading to
higher-quality model responses due to their ability to dynamically incorporate
bi-directional contexts. | cs.CL | David helps Goliath: Inference-Time Collaboration Between Small Specialized and Large General Diffusion LMs |
2023-05-24T06:19:14Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14770v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14770v2 | Manya Wadhwa, Jifan Chen, Junyi Jessy Li, Greg Durrett | 2023-11-14T18:30:28Z | cs.CL | The rise of large language models (LLMs) has brought a critical need for
high-quality human-labeled data, particularly for processes like human feedback
and evaluation. A common practice is to label data via consensus annotation
over crowdworker judgments. However, annotators' judgments for subjective tasks
can differ in many ways: they may have different qualitative judgments about an
example, and they may map those to a labeling scheme in different ways. We show
that these nuances can be captured by natural language explanations, and
propose a method to rescale ordinal annotations and explanations using LLMs.
Specifically, we feed annotators' Likert ratings and corresponding explanations
into an LLM and prompt it to produce a numeric score anchored in a scoring
rubric. These scores should reflect the annotators' underlying assessments of
the example. The rubric can be designed or modified after annotation, and
include distinctions that may not have been known when the original error
taxonomy was devised. We explore our technique in the context of rating system
outputs for a document-grounded question answering task, where LLMs achieve
near-human performance. Our method rescales the raw judgments without impacting
agreement and brings the scores closer to human judgments grounded in the same
scoring rubric. | cs.CL | Using Natural Language Explanations to Rescale Human Judgments |
2023-05-24T06:16:44Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14766v3 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14766v3 | Hao Sun, Xiao Liu, Yeyun Gong, Yan Zhang, Daxin Jiang, Linjun Yang, Nan Duan | 2023-10-19T05:02:39Z | cs.CL | With the advance of large language models (LLMs), the research field of LLM
applications becomes more and more popular and the idea of constructing
pipelines to accomplish complex tasks by stacking LLM API calls come true.
However, this kind of methods face two limitations: narrow information coverage
and low fault tolerance. In this work, we propose a novel method called ALLIES.
Given an input query, ALLIES leverages LLMs to iteratively generate new queries
related to the original query, enabling an iterative reasoning process. By
iteratively refining and expanding the scope of the original query, ALLIES
captures and utilizes hidden knowledge that may not be directly obtainable
through retrieval. We take zero-shot open-domain question answering (ODQA) as
an application scene and evaluate ALLIES on the widely-used benchmarks, such as
NQ, WebQ and TriviaQA. The experimental results demonstrate that ALLIES
significantly outperforms other zero-shot baselines, indicating its
effectiveness in tackling those challenges. Our code is available in
https://github.com/microsoft/SimXNS/tree/main/ALLIES. | cs.CL | Allies: Prompting Large Language Model with Beam Search |
2023-05-24T06:14:31Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14763v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14763v1 | Natalie Shapira, Mosh Levy, Seyed Hossein Alavi, Xuhui Zhou, Yejin Choi, Yoav Goldberg, Maarten Sap, Vered Shwartz | 2023-05-24T06:14:31Z | cs.CL | The escalating debate on AI's capabilities warrants developing reliable
metrics to assess machine "intelligence". Recently, many anecdotal examples
were used to suggest that newer large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT and
GPT-4 exhibit Neural Theory-of-Mind (N-ToM); however, prior work reached
conflicting conclusions regarding those abilities. We investigate the extent of
LLMs' N-ToM through an extensive evaluation on 6 tasks and find that while LLMs
exhibit certain N-ToM abilities, this behavior is far from being robust. We
further examine the factors impacting performance on N-ToM tasks and discover
that LLMs struggle with adversarial examples, indicating reliance on shallow
heuristics rather than robust ToM abilities. We caution against drawing
conclusions from anecdotal examples, limited benchmark testing, and using
human-designed psychological tests to evaluate models. | cs.CL | Clever Hans or Neural Theory of Mind? Stress Testing Social Reasoning in Large Language Models |
2023-05-24T06:11:17Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14761v3 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14761v3 | Ahmed Masry, Parsa Kavehzadeh, Xuan Long Do, Enamul Hoque, Shafiq Joty | 2023-10-10T23:39:25Z | cs.CL | Charts are very popular for analyzing data, visualizing key insights and
answering complex reasoning questions about data. To facilitate chart-based
data analysis using natural language, several downstream tasks have been
introduced recently such as chart question answering and chart summarization.
However, most of the methods that solve these tasks use pretraining on language
or vision-language tasks that do not attempt to explicitly model the structure
of the charts (e.g., how data is visually encoded and how chart elements are
related to each other). To address this, we first build a large corpus of
charts covering a wide variety of topics and visual styles. We then present
UniChart, a pretrained model for chart comprehension and reasoning. UniChart
encodes the relevant text, data, and visual elements of charts and then uses a
chart-grounded text decoder to generate the expected output in natural
language. We propose several chart-specific pretraining tasks that include: (i)
low-level tasks to extract the visual elements (e.g., bars, lines) and data
from charts, and (ii) high-level tasks to acquire chart understanding and
reasoning skills. We find that pretraining the model on a large corpus with
chart-specific low- and high-level tasks followed by finetuning on three
down-streaming tasks results in state-of-the-art performance on three
downstream tasks. | cs.CL | UniChart: A Universal Vision-language Pretrained Model for Chart Comprehension and Reasoning |
2023-05-24T06:09:26Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14760v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14760v2 | Shoujie Tong, Heming Xia, Damai Dai, Runxin Xu, Tianyu Liu, Binghuai Lin, Yunbo Cao, Zhifang Sui | 2023-10-22T11:46:33Z | cs.CL | Pretrained language models have achieved remarkable success in natural
language understanding. However, fine-tuning pretrained models on limited
training data tends to overfit and thus diminish performance. This paper
presents Bi-Drop, a fine-tuning strategy that selectively updates model
parameters using gradients from various sub-nets dynamically generated by
dropout. The sub-net estimation of Bi-Drop is performed in an in-batch manner,
so it overcomes the problem of hysteresis in sub-net updating, which is
possessed by previous methods that perform asynchronous sub-net estimation.
Also, Bi-Drop needs only one mini-batch to estimate the sub-net so it achieves
higher utility of training data. Experiments on the GLUE benchmark demonstrate
that Bi-Drop consistently outperforms previous fine-tuning methods.
Furthermore, empirical results also show that Bi-Drop exhibits excellent
generalization ability and robustness for domain transfer, data imbalance, and
low-resource scenarios. | cs.CL | Bi-Drop: Enhancing Fine-tuning Generalization via Synchronous sub-net Estimation and Optimization |
2023-05-24T06:02:32Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14757v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14757v2 | Salvatore Giorgi, Shreya Havaldar, Farhan Ahmed, Zuhaib Akhtar, Shalaka Vaidya, Gary Pan, Lyle H. Ungar, H. Andrew Schwartz, Joao Sedoc | 2023-09-16T02:35:44Z | cs.CL | We present metrics for evaluating dialog systems through a
psychologically-grounded "human" lens in which conversational agents express a
diversity of both states (e.g., emotion) and traits (e.g., personality), just
as people do. We present five interpretable metrics from established psychology
that are fundamental to human communication and relationships: emotional
entropy, linguistic style and emotion matching, agreeableness, and empathy.
These metrics can be applied (1) across dialogs and (2) on turns within
dialogs. The psychological metrics are compared against seven state-of-the-art
traditional metrics (e.g., BARTScore and BLEURT) on seven standard dialog
system data sets. We also introduce a novel data set, the Three Bot Dialog
Evaluation Corpus, which consists of annotated conversations from ChatGPT,
GPT-3, and BlenderBot. We demonstrate that our proposed metrics offer novel
information; they are uncorrelated with traditional metrics, can be used to
meaningfully compare dialog systems, and lead to increased accuracy (beyond
existing traditional metrics) in predicting crowd-sourced dialog judgements.
The interpretability and unique signal of our psychological metrics make them a
valuable tool for evaluating and improving dialog systems. | cs.CL | Psychological Metrics for Dialog System Evaluation |
2023-05-24T05:58:17Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14755v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14755v2 | Akhila Yerukola, Xuhui Zhou, Elizabeth Clark, Maarten Sap | 2023-10-23T17:11:30Z | cs.CL, cs.AI | Most existing stylistic text rewriting methods and evaluation metrics operate
on a sentence level, but ignoring the broader context of the text can lead to
preferring generic, ambiguous, and incoherent rewrites. In this paper, we
investigate integrating the preceding textual context into both the
$\textit{rewriting}$ and $\textit{evaluation}$ stages of stylistic text
rewriting, and introduce a new composite contextual evaluation metric
$\texttt{CtxSimFit}$ that combines similarity to the original sentence with
contextual cohesiveness. We comparatively evaluate non-contextual and
contextual rewrites in formality, toxicity, and sentiment transfer tasks. Our
experiments show that humans significantly prefer contextual rewrites as more
fitting and natural over non-contextual ones, yet existing sentence-level
automatic metrics (e.g., ROUGE, SBERT) correlate poorly with human preferences
($\rho$=0--0.3). In contrast, human preferences are much better reflected by
both our novel $\texttt{CtxSimFit}$ ($\rho$=0.7--0.9) as well as proposed
context-infused versions of common metrics ($\rho$=0.4--0.7). Overall, our
findings highlight the importance of integrating context into the generation
and especially the evaluation stages of stylistic text rewriting. | cs.CL | Don't Take This Out of Context! On the Need for Contextual Models and Evaluations for Stylistic Rewriting |
2023-05-24T05:53:38Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14751v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14751v1 | Zefan Cai, Xin Zheng, Tianyu Liu, Xu Wang, Haoran Meng, Jiaqi Han, Gang Yuan, Binghuai Lin, Baobao Chang, Yunbo Cao | 2023-05-24T05:53:38Z | cs.CL, cs.AI | In the constant updates of the product dialogue systems, we need to retrain
the natural language understanding (NLU) model as new data from the real users
would be merged into the existent data accumulated in the last updates. Within
the newly added data, new intents would emerge and might have semantic
entanglement with the existing intents, e.g. new intents that are semantically
too specific or generic are actually subset or superset of some existing
intents in the semantic space, thus impairing the robustness of the NLU model.
As the first attempt to solve this problem, we setup a new benchmark consisting
of 4 Dialogue Version Control dataSets (DialogVCS). We formulate the intent
detection with imperfect data in the system update as a multi-label
classification task with positive but unlabeled intents, which asks the models
to recognize all the proper intents, including the ones with semantic
entanglement, in the inference. We also propose comprehensive baseline models
and conduct in-depth analyses for the benchmark, showing that the semantically
entangled intents can be effectively recognized with an automatic workflow. | cs.CL | DialogVCS: Robust Natural Language Understanding in Dialogue System Upgrade |
2023-05-24T05:53:11Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14750v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14750v1 | Nishant Balepur, Jie Huang, Samraj Moorjani, Hari Sundaram, Kevin Chen-Chuan Chang | 2023-05-24T05:53:11Z | cs.CL | When answering complex questions, large language models (LLMs) may produce
answers that do not satisfy all criteria of the question. While existing
self-evaluation techniques aim to detect if such answers are correct, these
techniques are unable to determine which criteria of the question are satisfied
by the generated answers. To address this issue, we propose answer-based claim
decomposition (ABCD), a prompting strategy that decomposes questions into a
series of true/false claims that can be used to verify which criteria of the
input question an answer satisfies. Using the decomposed ABCD claims, we
perform fine-grained self-evaluation. Through preliminary experiments on three
datasets, including a newly-collected challenge dataset ObscureQA, we find that
GPT-3.5 has some ability to determine to what extent its answer satisfies the
criteria of the input question, and can give insights into the errors and
knowledge gaps of the model. | cs.CL | Mastering the ABCDs of Complex Questions: Answer-Based Claim Decomposition for Fine-grained Self-Evaluation |
2023-05-24T05:21:13Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14740v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14740v2 | Yuxi Xie, Guanzhen Li, Min-Yen Kan | 2023-10-23T10:35:30Z | cs.AI, cs.CL, cs.CV | We introduce ECHo (Event Causality Inference via Human-Centric Reasoning), a
diagnostic dataset of event causality inference grounded in visio-linguistic
social scenarios. ECHo employs real-world human-centric deductive information
building on a television crime drama. ECHo requires the Theory-of-Mind (ToM)
ability to understand and reason about social interactions based on multimodal
information. Using ECHo, we propose a unified Chain-of-Thought (CoT) framework
to assess the reasoning capability of current AI systems. Our ToM-enhanced CoT
pipeline accommodates various large foundation models in both zero-shot and
few-shot visio-linguistic reasoning. We use this framework to scrutinize recent
large foundation models such as InstructGPT and MiniGPT-4 on three diagnostic
human-centric tasks. Further analysis demonstrates ECHo as a challenging
dataset to expose imperfections and inconsistencies in reasoning. Our data and
code are publicly available at https://github.com/YuxiXie/ECHo. | cs.AI | ECHo: A Visio-Linguistic Dataset for Event Causality Inference via Human-Centric Reasoning |
2023-05-24T05:19:15Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14739v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14739v1 | Weijia Shi, Xiaochuang Han, Mike Lewis, Yulia Tsvetkov, Luke Zettlemoyer, Scott Wen-tau Yih | 2023-05-24T05:19:15Z | cs.CL | Language models (LMs) often struggle to pay enough attention to the input
context, and generate texts that are unfaithful or contain hallucinations. To
mitigate this issue, we present context-aware decoding (CAD), which follows a
contrastive output distribution that amplifies the difference between the
output probabilities when a model is used with and without context. Our
experiments show that CAD, without additional training, significantly improves
the faithfulness of different LM families, including OPT, GPT, LLaMA and
FLAN-T5 for summarization tasks (e.g., 14.3% gain for LLaMA in factuality
metrics). Furthermore, CAD is particularly effective in overriding a model's
prior knowledge when it contradicts the provided context, leading to
substantial improvements in tasks where resolving the knowledge conflict is
essential. | cs.CL | Trusting Your Evidence: Hallucinate Less with Context-aware Decoding |
2023-05-24T05:15:36Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14735v3 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14735v3 | Vyoma Raman, Eve Fleisig, Dan Klein | 2023-12-01T19:45:25Z | cs.CL, cs.AI, cs.LG | The impact of AI models on marginalized communities has traditionally been
measured by identifying performance differences between specified demographic
subgroups. Though this approach aims to center vulnerable groups, it risks
obscuring patterns of harm faced by intersectional subgroups or shared across
multiple groups. To address this, we draw on theories of marginalization from
disability studies and related disciplines, which state that people farther
from the norm face greater adversity, to consider the "margins" in the domain
of toxicity detection. We operationalize the "margins" of a dataset by
employing outlier detection to identify text about people with demographic
attributes distant from the "norm". We find that model performance is
consistently worse for demographic outliers, with mean squared error (MSE)
between outliers and non-outliers up to 70.4% worse across toxicity types. It
is also worse for text outliers, with a MSE up to 68.4% higher for outliers
than non-outliers. We also find text and demographic outliers to be
particularly susceptible to errors in the classification of severe toxicity and
identity attacks. Compared to analysis of disparities using traditional
demographic breakdowns, we find that our outlier analysis frequently surfaces
greater harms faced by a larger, more intersectional group, which suggests that
outlier analysis is particularly beneficial for identifying harms against those
groups. | cs.CL | Centering the Margins: Outlier-Based Identification of Harmed Populations in Toxicity Detection |
2023-05-24T05:12:58Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14734v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14734v2 | Bashar Alhafni, Go Inoue, Christian Khairallah, Nizar Habash | 2023-11-09T16:10:59Z | cs.CL | Grammatical error correction (GEC) is a well-explored problem in English with
many existing models and datasets. However, research on GEC in morphologically
rich languages has been limited due to challenges such as data scarcity and
language complexity. In this paper, we present the first results on Arabic GEC
using two newly developed Transformer-based pretrained sequence-to-sequence
models. We also define the task of multi-class Arabic grammatical error
detection (GED) and present the first results on multi-class Arabic GED. We
show that using GED information as an auxiliary input in GEC models improves
GEC performance across three datasets spanning different genres. Moreover, we
also investigate the use of contextual morphological preprocessing in aiding
GEC systems. Our models achieve SOTA results on two Arabic GEC shared task
datasets and establish a strong benchmark on a recently created dataset. We
make our code, data, and pretrained models publicly available. | cs.CL | Advancements in Arabic Grammatical Error Detection and Correction: An Empirical Investigation |
2023-05-24T05:06:28Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14728v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14728v2 | Victoria Lin, Louis-Philippe Morency | 2023-06-01T20:55:25Z | cs.CL | Although deep language representations have become the dominant form of
language featurization in recent years, in many settings it is important to
understand a model's decision-making process. This necessitates not only an
interpretable model but also interpretable features. In particular, language
must be featurized in a way that is interpretable while still characterizing
the original text well. We present SenteCon, a method for introducing human
interpretability in deep language representations. Given a passage of text,
SenteCon encodes the text as a layer of interpretable categories in which each
dimension corresponds to the relevance of a specific category. Our empirical
evaluations indicate that encoding language with SenteCon provides high-level
interpretability at little to no cost to predictive performance on downstream
tasks. Moreover, we find that SenteCon outperforms existing interpretable
language representations with respect to both its downstream performance and
its agreement with human characterizations of the text. | cs.CL | SenteCon: Leveraging Lexicons to Learn Human-Interpretable Language Representations |
2023-05-24T05:04:00Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14726v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14726v2 | Dan Iter, Reid Pryzant, Ruochen Xu, Shuohang Wang, Yang Liu, Yichong Xu, Chenguang Zhu | 2023-11-27T19:53:27Z | cs.CL, cs.AI | Large language models (LLMs) can use in-context demonstrations to improve
performance on zero-shot tasks. However, selecting the best in-context examples
is challenging because model performance can vary widely depending on the
selected examples. We present a cross-entropy difference (CED) method for
selecting in-context demonstrations. Our method is based on the observation
that the effectiveness of in-context demonstrations negatively correlates with
the perplexity of the test example by a language model that was finetuned on
that demonstration. We utilize parameter efficient finetuning to train small
models on training data that are used for computing the cross-entropy
difference between a test example and every candidate in-context demonstration.
This metric is used to rank and select in-context demonstrations independently
for each test input. We evaluate our method on a mix-domain dataset that
combines 8 benchmarks, representing 4 text generation tasks, showing that CED
for in-context demonstration selection can improve performance for a variety of
LLMs. | cs.CL | In-Context Demonstration Selection with Cross Entropy Difference |
2023-05-24T05:01:48Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14725v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14725v1 | Barry Menglong Yao, Yu Chen, Qifan Wang, Sijia Wang, Minqian Liu, Zhiyang Xu, Licheng Yu, Lifu Huang | 2023-05-24T05:01:48Z | cs.CL, I.2.7 | We propose attribute-aware multimodal entity linking, where the input is a
mention described with a text and image, and the goal is to predict the
corresponding target entity from a multimodal knowledge base (KB) where each
entity is also described with a text description, a visual image and a set of
attributes and values. To support this research, we construct AMELI, a
large-scale dataset consisting of 18,472 reviews and 35,598 products. To
establish baseline performance on AMELI, we experiment with the current
state-of-the-art multimodal entity linking approaches and our enhanced
attribute-aware model and demonstrate the importance of incorporating the
attribute information into the entity linking process. To be best of our
knowledge, we are the first to build benchmark dataset and solutions for the
attribute-aware multimodal entity linking task. Datasets and codes will be made
publicly available. | cs.CL | AMELI: Enhancing Multimodal Entity Linking with Fine-Grained Attributes |
2023-05-24T05:01:10Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14724v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14724v2 | Tuhin Chakrabarty, Arkadiy Saakyan, Olivia Winn, Artemis Panagopoulou, Yue Yang, Marianna Apidianaki, Smaranda Muresan | 2023-07-14T16:09:46Z | cs.CL, cs.AI, cs.CV, cs.HC | Visual metaphors are powerful rhetorical devices used to persuade or
communicate creative ideas through images. Similar to linguistic metaphors,
they convey meaning implicitly through symbolism and juxtaposition of the
symbols. We propose a new task of generating visual metaphors from linguistic
metaphors. This is a challenging task for diffusion-based text-to-image models,
such as DALL$\cdot$E 2, since it requires the ability to model implicit meaning
and compositionality. We propose to solve the task through the collaboration
between Large Language Models (LLMs) and Diffusion Models: Instruct GPT-3
(davinci-002) with Chain-of-Thought prompting generates text that represents a
visual elaboration of the linguistic metaphor containing the implicit meaning
and relevant objects, which is then used as input to the diffusion-based
text-to-image models.Using a human-AI collaboration framework, where humans
interact both with the LLM and the top-performing diffusion model, we create a
high-quality dataset containing 6,476 visual metaphors for 1,540 linguistic
metaphors and their associated visual elaborations. Evaluation by professional
illustrators shows the promise of LLM-Diffusion Model collaboration for this
task . To evaluate the utility of our Human-AI collaboration framework and the
quality of our dataset, we perform both an intrinsic human-based evaluation and
an extrinsic evaluation using visual entailment as a downstream task. | cs.CL | I Spy a Metaphor: Large Language Models and Diffusion Models Co-Create Visual Metaphors |
2023-05-24T04:47:55Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14719v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14719v1 | Michael Kranzlein, Nathan Schneider, Kevin Tobia | 2023-05-24T04:47:55Z | cs.CL | Most judicial decisions involve the interpretation of legal texts; as such,
judicial opinion requires the use of language as a medium to comment on or draw
attention to other language. Language used this way is called metalanguage. We
develop an annotation schema for categorizing types of legal metalanguage and
apply our schema to a set of U.S. Supreme Court opinions, yielding a corpus
totaling 59k tokens. We remark on several patterns observed in the kinds of
metalanguage used by the justices. | cs.CL | CuRIAM: Corpus re Interpretation and Metalanguage in U.S. Supreme Court Opinions |
2023-05-24T04:42:17Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14718v5 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14718v5 | Ashutosh Baheti, Ximing Lu, Faeze Brahman, Ronan Le Bras, Maarten Sap, Mark Riedl | 2024-04-20T00:34:59Z | cs.CL | Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback (RLHF) is the most prominent
method for Language Model (LM) alignment. However, RLHF is an unstable and
data-hungry process that continually requires new high-quality LM-generated
data for finetuning. We introduce Advantage-Leftover Lunch RL (A-LoL), a new
class of offline policy gradient algorithms that enable RL training on any
pre-existing data. By assuming the entire LM output sequence as a single
action, A-LoL allows incorporating sequence-level classifiers or human-designed
scoring functions as rewards. Subsequently, by using LM's value estimate, A-LoL
only trains on positive advantage (leftover) data points, making it resilient
to noise. Overall, A-LoL is an easy-to-implement, sample-efficient, and stable
LM training recipe.
We demonstrate the effectiveness of A-LoL and its variants with a set of four
different language generation tasks. We compare against both online RL (PPO)
and recent preference-based (DPO, PRO) and reward-based (GOLD) offline RL
baselines. On the commonly-used RLHF benchmark, Helpful and Harmless Assistant
(HHA), LMs trained with A-LoL methods achieve the highest diversity while also
being rated more safe and helpful than the baselines according to humans.
Additionally, in the remaining three tasks, A-LoL could optimize multiple
distinct reward functions even when using noisy or suboptimal training data.
We also release our experimental code. https://github.com/abaheti95/LoL-RL | cs.CL | Leftover Lunch: Advantage-based Offline Reinforcement Learning for Language Models |
2023-05-24T04:38:29Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14717v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14717v1 | Linhan Zhang, Qian Chen, Wen Wang, Yuxin Jiang, Bing Li, Wei Wang, Xin Cao | 2023-05-24T04:38:29Z | cs.CL, cs.AI | Definition modeling is an important task in advanced natural language
applications such as understanding and conversation. Since its introduction, it
focus on generating one definition for a target word or phrase in a given
context, which we refer to as Single Definition Modeling (SDM). However, this
approach does not adequately model the correlations and patterns among
different contexts and definitions of words. In addition, the creation of a
training dataset for SDM requires significant human expertise and effort. In
this paper, we carefully design a new task called Multiple Definition Modeling
(MDM) that pool together all contexts and definition of target words. We
demonstrate the ease of creating a model as well as multiple training sets
automatically. % In the experiments, we demonstrate and analyze the benefits of
MDM, including improving SDM's performance by using MDM as the pretraining task
and its comparable performance in the zero-shot setting. | cs.CL | Exploiting Correlations Between Contexts and Definitions with Multiple Definition Modeling |
2023-05-24T04:36:32Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14716v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14716v1 | Yueqi Song, Catherine Cui, Simran Khanuja, Pengfei Liu, Fahim Faisal, Alissa Ostapenko, Genta Indra Winata, Alham Fikri Aji, Samuel Cahyawijaya, Yulia Tsvetkov, Antonios Anastasopoulos, Graham Neubig | 2023-05-24T04:36:32Z | cs.CL | Despite the major advances in NLP, significant disparities in NLP system
performance across languages still exist. Arguably, these are due to uneven
resource allocation and sub-optimal incentives to work on less resourced
languages. To track and further incentivize the global development of equitable
language technology, we introduce GlobalBench. Prior multilingual benchmarks
are static and have focused on a limited number of tasks and languages. In
contrast, GlobalBench is an ever-expanding collection that aims to dynamically
track progress on all NLP datasets in all languages. Rather than solely
measuring accuracy, GlobalBench also tracks the estimated per-speaker utility
and equity of technology across all languages, providing a multi-faceted view
of how language technology is serving people of the world. Furthermore,
GlobalBench is designed to identify the most under-served languages, and
rewards research efforts directed towards those languages. At present, the most
under-served languages are the ones with a relatively high population, but
nonetheless overlooked by composite multilingual benchmarks (like Punjabi,
Portuguese, and Wu Chinese). Currently, GlobalBench covers 966 datasets in 190
languages, and has 1,128 system submissions spanning 62 languages. | cs.CL | GlobalBench: A Benchmark for Global Progress in Natural Language Processing |
2023-05-24T04:27:40Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14711v3 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14711v3 | Haoyi Qiu, Zi-Yi Dou, Tianlu Wang, Asli Celikyilmaz, Nanyun Peng | 2023-11-03T00:50:25Z | cs.CL | Model-based evaluation metrics (e.g., CLIPScore and GPTScore) have
demonstrated decent correlations with human judgments in various language
generation tasks. However, their impact on fairness remains largely unexplored.
It is widely recognized that pretrained models can inadvertently encode
societal biases, thus employing these models for evaluation purposes may
inadvertently perpetuate and amplify biases. For example, an evaluation metric
may favor the caption "a woman is calculating an account book" over "a man is
calculating an account book," even if the image only shows male accountants. In
this paper, we conduct a systematic study of gender biases in model-based
automatic evaluation metrics for image captioning tasks. We start by curating a
dataset comprising profession, activity, and object concepts associated with
stereotypical gender associations. Then, we demonstrate the negative
consequences of using these biased metrics, including the inability to
differentiate between biased and unbiased generations, as well as the
propagation of biases to generation models through reinforcement learning.
Finally, we present a simple and effective way to mitigate the metric bias
without hurting the correlations with human judgments. Our dataset and
framework lay the foundation for understanding the potential harm of
model-based evaluation metrics, and facilitate future works to develop more
inclusive evaluation metrics. | cs.CL | Gender Biases in Automatic Evaluation Metrics for Image Captioning |
2023-05-24T04:27:21Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14710v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14710v2 | Jiashu Xu, Mingyu Derek Ma, Fei Wang, Chaowei Xiao, Muhao Chen | 2024-04-03T09:15:15Z | cs.CL, cs.AI, cs.CR, cs.LG | We investigate security concerns of the emergent instruction tuning paradigm,
that models are trained on crowdsourced datasets with task instructions to
achieve superior performance. Our studies demonstrate that an attacker can
inject backdoors by issuing very few malicious instructions (~1000 tokens) and
control model behavior through data poisoning, without even the need to modify
data instances or labels themselves. Through such instruction attacks, the
attacker can achieve over 90% attack success rate across four commonly used NLP
datasets. As an empirical study on instruction attacks, we systematically
evaluated unique perspectives of instruction attacks, such as poison transfer
where poisoned models can transfer to 15 diverse generative datasets in a
zero-shot manner; instruction transfer where attackers can directly apply
poisoned instruction on many other datasets; and poison resistance to continual
finetuning. Lastly, we show that RLHF and clean demonstrations might mitigate
such backdoors to some degree. These findings highlight the need for more
robust defenses against poisoning attacks in instruction-tuning models and
underscore the importance of ensuring data quality in instruction
crowdsourcing. | cs.CL | Instructions as Backdoors: Backdoor Vulnerabilities of Instruction Tuning for Large Language Models |
2023-05-24T04:24:16Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14707v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14707v2 | Dhananjay Ashok, Atharva Kulkarni, Hai Pham, Barnabás Póczos | 2023-10-12T21:13:09Z | cs.CL, cs.AI, cs.LG | Due to the prohibitively high cost of creating error correction datasets,
most Factual Claim Correction methods rely on a powerful verification model to
guide the correction process. This leads to a significant drop in performance
in domains like scientific claims, where good verification models do not always
exist. In this work, we introduce SciFix, a scientific claim correction system
that does not require a verifier but can outperform existing methods by a
considerable margin -- achieving correction accuracy of 84% on the SciFact
dataset, 77% on SciFact-Open and 72% on the CovidFact dataset, compared to next
best accuracies of 7%, 5%, and 15% on the same datasets respectively. Our
method leverages the power of prompting with LLMs during training to create a
richly annotated dataset that can be used for fully supervised training and
regularization. We additionally use a claim-aware decoding procedure to improve
the quality of corrected claims. Our method outperforms the very LLM that was
used to generate the annotated dataset -- with Few-Shot Prompting on GPT3.5
achieving 58%, 61%, and 64% on the respective datasets, a consistently lower
correction accuracy, despite using nearly 800 times as many parameters as our
model. | cs.CL | SciFix: Outperforming GPT3 on Scientific Factual Error Correction |
2023-05-24T04:22:26Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14705v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14705v2 | Sheng Shen, Le Hou, Yanqi Zhou, Nan Du, Shayne Longpre, Jason Wei, Hyung Won Chung, Barret Zoph, William Fedus, Xinyun Chen, Tu Vu, Yuexin Wu, Wuyang Chen, Albert Webson, Yunxuan Li, Vincent Zhao, Hongkun Yu, Kurt Keutzer, Trevor Darrell, Denny Zhou | 2023-07-05T17:24:43Z | cs.CL | Sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) is a neural architecture design that can be
utilized to add learnable parameters to Large Language Models (LLMs) without
increasing inference cost. Instruction tuning is a technique for training LLMs
to follow instructions. We advocate combining these two approaches, as we find
that MoE models benefit more from instruction tuning than dense models. In
particular, we conduct empirical studies across three experimental setups: (i)
Direct finetuning on individual downstream tasks devoid of instruction tuning;
(ii) Instructiontuning followed by in-context few-shot or zero-shot
generalization on downstream tasks; and (iii) Instruction tuning supplemented
by further finetuning on individual downstream tasks. In the first scenario,
MoE models overall underperform dense models of identical computational
capacity. This narrative, however, dramatically changes with the introduction
of instruction tuning (second and third scenario), used independently or in
conjunction with task-specific finetuning. Our most powerful model,
FLAN-MOE-32B, surpasses the performance of FLAN-PALM-62B on four benchmark
tasks, while using only a third of the FLOPs. The advancements embodied
byFLAN-MOE inspire a reevaluation of the design principles of large-scale,
high-performance language models in the framework of task-agnostic learning. | cs.CL | Mixture-of-Experts Meets Instruction Tuning:A Winning Combination for Large Language Models |
2023-05-24T04:13:15Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14702v3 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14702v3 | Yebowen Hu, Kaiqiang Song, Sangwoo Cho, Xiaoyang Wang, Hassan Foroosh, Fei Liu | 2023-10-28T01:03:15Z | cs.CL | Human preference judgments are pivotal in guiding large language models
(LLMs) to produce outputs that align with human values. Human evaluations are
also used in summarization tasks to compare outputs from various systems,
complementing existing automatic metrics. Despite their significance, however,
there has been limited research probing these pairwise or $k$-wise comparisons.
The collective impact and relative importance of factors such as output length,
informativeness, fluency, and factual consistency are still not well
understood. It is also unclear if there are other hidden factors influencing
human judgments. In this paper, we conduct an in-depth examination of a
collection of pairwise human judgments released by OpenAI. Utilizing the
Bradley-Terry-Luce (BTL) model, we reveal the inherent preferences embedded in
these human judgments. We find that the most favored factors vary across tasks
and genres, whereas the least favored factors tend to be consistent, e.g.,
outputs are too brief, contain excessive off-focus content or hallucinated
facts. Our findings have implications on the construction of balanced datasets
in human preference evaluations, which is a crucial step in shaping the
behaviors of future LLMs. | cs.CL | DecipherPref: Analyzing Influential Factors in Human Preference Judgments via GPT-4 |
2023-05-24T04:11:59Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14701v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14701v1 | R. Thomas McCoy, Thomas L. Griffiths | 2023-05-24T04:11:59Z | cs.CL, cs.AI | Humans can learn languages from remarkably little experience. Developing
computational models that explain this ability has been a major challenge in
cognitive science. Bayesian models that build in strong inductive biases -
factors that guide generalization - have been successful at explaining how
humans might generalize from few examples in controlled settings but are
usually too restrictive to be tractably applied to more naturalistic data. By
contrast, neural networks have flexible representations that allow them to
learn well from naturalistic data but require many more examples than humans
receive. We show that learning from limited naturalistic data is possible with
an approach that combines the strong inductive biases of a Bayesian model with
the flexible representations of a neural network. This approach works by
distilling a Bayesian model's biases into a neural network. Like a Bayesian
model, the resulting system can learn formal linguistic patterns from a small
number of examples. Like a neural network, it can also learn aspects of English
syntax from a corpus of natural language - and it outperforms a standard neural
network at acquiring the linguistic phenomena of recursion and priming.
Bridging the divide between Bayesian models and neural networks makes it
possible to handle a broader range of learning scenarios than either approach
can handle on its own. | cs.CL | Modeling rapid language learning by distilling Bayesian priors into artificial neural networks |
2023-05-24T04:01:27Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14696v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14696v1 | Dheeraj Mekala, Adithya Samavedhi, Chengyu Dong, Jingbo Shang | 2023-05-24T04:01:27Z | cs.CL | Deep neural classifiers trained with cross-entropy loss (CE loss) often
suffer from poor calibration, necessitating the task of out-of-distribution
(OOD) detection. Traditional supervised OOD detection methods require expensive
manual annotation of in-distribution and OOD samples. To address the annotation
bottleneck, we introduce SELFOOD, a self-supervised OOD detection method that
requires only in-distribution samples as supervision. We cast OOD detection as
an inter-document intra-label (IDIL) ranking problem and train the classifier
with our pairwise ranking loss, referred to as IDIL loss. Specifically, given a
set of in-distribution documents and their labels, for each label, we train the
classifier to rank the softmax scores of documents belonging to that label to
be higher than the scores of documents that belong to other labels. Unlike CE
loss, our IDIL loss function reaches zero when the desired confidence ranking
is achieved and gradients are backpropagated to decrease probabilities
associated with incorrect labels rather than continuously increasing the
probability of the correct label. Extensive experiments with several
classifiers on multiple classification datasets demonstrate the effectiveness
of our method in both coarse- and fine-grained settings. | cs.CL | SELFOOD: Self-Supervised Out-Of-Distribution Detection via Learning to Rank |
2023-05-24T03:59:18Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14695v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14695v2 | Fei Wang, Wenjie Mo, Yiwei Wang, Wenxuan Zhou, Muhao Chen | 2023-10-26T19:02:27Z | cs.CL, cs.AI, cs.LG | Entity bias widely affects pretrained (large) language models, causing them
to rely on (biased) parametric knowledge to make unfaithful predictions.
Although causality-inspired methods have shown great potential to mitigate
entity bias, it is hard to precisely estimate the parameters of underlying
causal models in practice. The rise of black-box LLMs also makes the situation
even worse, because of their inaccessible parameters and uncalibrated logits.
To address these problems, we propose a specific structured causal model (SCM)
whose parameters are comparatively easier to estimate. Building upon this SCM,
we propose causal intervention techniques to mitigate entity bias for both
white-box and black-box settings. The proposed causal intervention perturbs the
original entity with neighboring entities. This intervention reduces specific
biasing information pertaining to the original entity while still preserving
sufficient semantic information from similar entities. Under the white-box
setting, our training-time intervention improves OOD performance of PLMs on
relation extraction (RE) and machine reading comprehension (MRC) by 5.7 points
and by 9.1 points, respectively. Under the black-box setting, our in-context
intervention effectively reduces the entity-based knowledge conflicts of
GPT-3.5, achieving up to 20.5 points of improvement of exact match accuracy on
MRC and up to 17.6 points of reduction in memorization ratio on RE. Our code is
available at https://github.com/luka-group/Causal-View-of-Entity-Bias. | cs.CL | A Causal View of Entity Bias in (Large) Language Models |
2023-05-24T03:53:43Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14693v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14693v1 | Xiaoyang Song, Akshat Gupta, Kiyan Mohebbizadeh, Shujie Hu, Anant Singh | 2023-05-24T03:53:43Z | cs.CL, cs.LG | Have Large Language Models (LLMs) developed a personality? The short answer
is a resounding "We Don't Know!". In this paper, we show that we do not yet
have the right tools to measure personality in language models. Personality is
an important characteristic that influences behavior. As LLMs emulate
human-like intelligence and performance in various tasks, a natural question to
ask is whether these models have developed a personality. Previous works have
evaluated machine personality through self-assessment personality tests, which
are a set of multiple-choice questions created to evaluate personality in
humans. A fundamental assumption here is that human personality tests can
accurately measure personality in machines. In this paper, we investigate the
emergence of personality in five LLMs of different sizes ranging from 1.5B to
30B. We propose the Option-Order Symmetry property as a necessary condition for
the reliability of these self-assessment tests. Under this condition, the
answer to self-assessment questions is invariant to the order in which the
options are presented. We find that many LLMs personality test responses do not
preserve option-order symmetry. We take a deeper look at LLMs test responses
where option-order symmetry is preserved to find that in these cases, LLMs do
not take into account the situational statement being tested and produce the
exact same answer irrespective of the situation being tested. We also identify
the existence of inherent biases in these LLMs which is the root cause of the
aforementioned phenomenon and makes self-assessment tests unreliable. These
observations indicate that self-assessment tests are not the correct tools to
measure personality in LLMs. Through this paper, we hope to draw attention to
the shortcomings of current literature in measuring personality in LLMs and
call for developing tools for machine personality measurement. | cs.CL | Have Large Language Models Developed a Personality?: Applicability of Self-Assessment Tests in Measuring Personality in LLMs |
2023-05-24T03:51:31Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14688v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14688v1 | Benfeng Xu, An Yang, Junyang Lin, Quan Wang, Chang Zhou, Yongdong Zhang, Zhendong Mao | 2023-05-24T03:51:31Z | cs.CL, cs.AI | The answering quality of an aligned large language model (LLM) can be
drastically improved if treated with proper crafting of prompts. In this paper,
we propose ExpertPrompting to elicit the potential of LLMs to answer as
distinguished experts. We first utilize In-Context Learning to automatically
synthesize detailed and customized descriptions of the expert identity for each
specific instruction, and then ask LLMs to provide answer conditioned on such
agent background. Based on this augmented prompting strategy, we produce a new
set of instruction-following data using GPT-3.5, and train a competitive
open-source chat assistant called ExpertLLaMA. We employ GPT4-based evaluation
to show that 1) the expert data is of significantly higher quality than vanilla
answers, and 2) ExpertLLaMA outperforms existing open-source opponents and
achieves 96\% of the original ChatGPT's capability. All data and the
ExpertLLaMA model will be made publicly available at
\url{https://github.com/OFA-Sys/ExpertLLaMA}. | cs.CL | ExpertPrompting: Instructing Large Language Models to be Distinguished Experts |
2023-05-24T03:47:22Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.16340v3 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.16340v3 | Yinghan Long, Sayeed Shafayet Chowdhury, Kaushik Roy | 2023-10-23T01:44:58Z | cs.CL, cs.AI, cs.LG | Transformers have shown dominant performance across a range of domains
including language and vision. However, their computational cost grows
quadratically with the sequence length, making their usage prohibitive for
resource-constrained applications. To counter this, our approach is to divide
the whole sequence into segments and apply attention to the individual
segments. We propose a segmented recurrent transformer (SRformer) that combines
segmented (local) attention with recurrent attention. The loss caused by
reducing the attention window length is compensated by aggregating information
across segments with recurrent attention. SRformer leverages Recurrent
Accumulate-and-Fire (RAF) neurons' inherent memory to update the cumulative
product of keys and values. The segmented attention and lightweight RAF neurons
ensure the efficiency of the proposed transformer. Such an approach leads to
models with sequential processing capability at a lower computation/memory
cost. We apply the proposed method to T5 and BART transformers. The modified
models are tested on summarization datasets including CNN-dailymail, XSUM,
ArXiv, and MediaSUM. Notably, using segmented inputs of varied sizes, the
proposed model achieves $6-22\%$ higher ROUGE1 scores than a segmented
transformer and outperforms other recurrent transformer approaches.
Furthermore, compared to full attention, the proposed model reduces the
computational complexity of cross attention by around $40\%$. | cs.CL | Segmented Recurrent Transformer: An Efficient Sequence-to-Sequence Model |
2023-05-24T03:42:44Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14682v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14682v1 | Jian Wu, Yicheng Xu, Yan Gao, Jian-Guang Lou, Börje F. Karlsson, Manabu Okumura | 2023-05-24T03:42:44Z | cs.CL | Hybrid Question-Answering (HQA), which targets reasoning over tables and
passages linked from table cells, has witnessed significant research in recent
years. A common challenge in HQA and other passage-table QA datasets is that it
is generally unrealistic to iterate over all table rows, columns, and linked
passages to retrieve evidence. Such a challenge made it difficult for previous
studies to show their reasoning ability in retrieving answers. To bridge this
gap, we propose a novel Table-alignment-based Cell-selection and Reasoning
model (TACR) for hybrid text and table QA, evaluated on the HybridQA and
WikiTableQuestions datasets. In evidence retrieval, we design a
table-question-alignment enhanced cell-selection method to retrieve
fine-grained evidence. In answer reasoning, we incorporate a QA module that
treats the row containing selected cells as context. Experimental results over
the HybridQA and WikiTableQuestions (WTQ) datasets show that TACR achieves
state-of-the-art results on cell selection and outperforms fine-grained
evidence retrieval baselines on HybridQA, while achieving competitive
performance on WTQ. We also conducted a detailed analysis to demonstrate that
being able to align questions to tables in the cell-selection stage can result
in important gains from experiments of over 90\% table row and column selection
accuracy, meanwhile also improving output explainability. | cs.CL | TACR: A Table-alignment-based Cell-selection and Reasoning Model for Hybrid Question-Answering |
2023-05-24T03:42:43Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14681v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14681v2 | James A. Michaelov, Benjamin K. Bergen | 2023-11-15T18:47:42Z | cs.CL | Does inverse scaling only occur as a function of model size, or can it also
occur over the course of training? We carry out an exploratory study
investigating whether the performance of language models on specific tasks can
decrease (while general performance remains high) during training on the
language modeling task. We find 8 tasks on which Pythia 12B (Biderman et al.,
2023) shows decreased performance over the course of training. Five of these
tasks (TruthfulQA-MC1, TruthfulQA-MC2, Hindsight Neglect, Memo Trap, and
Pattern Match Suppression) additionally show a consistent relationship whereby
larger language models show a greater decrease in performance the more they are
trained, despite showing standard (positive) scaling overall. This highlights
the importance of testing performance at all relevant benchmarks any time
models are trained on additional data, even if their overall performance
improves | cs.CL | Emergent inabilities? Inverse scaling over the course of pretraining |
2023-05-24T03:33:21Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14676v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14676v1 | Woojeong Jin, Subhabrata Mukherjee, Yu Cheng, Yelong Shen, Weizhu Chen, Ahmed Hassan Awadallah, Damien Jose, Xiang Ren | 2023-05-24T03:33:21Z | cs.CL | Generalization to unseen tasks is an important ability for few-shot learners
to achieve better zero-/few-shot performance on diverse tasks. However, such
generalization to vision-language tasks including grounding and generation
tasks has been under-explored; existing few-shot VL models struggle to handle
tasks that involve object grounding and multiple images such as visual
commonsense reasoning or NLVR2. In this paper, we introduce GRILL, GRounded
vIsion Language aLigning, a novel VL model that can be generalized to diverse
tasks including visual question answering, captioning, and grounding tasks with
no or very few training instances. Specifically, GRILL learns object grounding
and localization by exploiting object-text alignments, which enables it to
transfer to grounding tasks in a zero-/few-shot fashion. We evaluate our model
on various zero-/few-shot VL tasks and show that it consistently surpasses the
state-of-the-art few-shot methods. | cs.CL | GRILL: Grounded Vision-language Pre-training via Aligning Text and Image Regions |
2023-05-24T03:25:33Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14672v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14672v1 | Xinmei Yang, Abhishek Arora, Shao-Yu Jheng, Melissa Dell | 2023-05-24T03:25:33Z | cs.CL, cs.CV, econ.GN, q-fin.EC | Record linkage is a bedrock of quantitative social science, as analyses often
require linking data from multiple, noisy sources. Off-the-shelf string
matching methods are widely used, as they are straightforward and cheap to
implement and scale. Not all character substitutions are equally probable, and
for some settings there are widely used handcrafted lists denoting which string
substitutions are more likely, that improve the accuracy of string matching.
However, such lists do not exist for many settings, skewing research with
linked datasets towards a few high-resource contexts that are not
representative of the diversity of human societies. This study develops an
extensible way to measure character substitution costs for OCR'ed documents, by
employing large-scale self-supervised training of vision transformers (ViT)
with augmented digital fonts. For each language written with the CJK script, we
contrastively learn a metric space where different augmentations of the same
character are represented nearby. In this space, homoglyphic characters - those
with similar appearance such as ``O'' and ``0'' - have similar vector
representations. Using the cosine distance between characters' representations
as the substitution cost in an edit distance matching algorithm significantly
improves record linkage compared to other widely used string matching methods,
as OCR errors tend to be homoglyphic in nature. Homoglyphs can plausibly
capture character visual similarity across any script, including low-resource
settings. We illustrate this by creating homoglyph sets for 3,000 year old
ancient Chinese characters, which are highly pictorial. Fascinatingly, a ViT is
able to capture relationships in how different abstract concepts were
conceptualized by ancient societies, that have been noted in the archaeological
literature. | cs.CL | Quantifying Character Similarity with Vision Transformers |
2023-05-24T03:25:32Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14671v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14671v2 | Hao Zou, Zae Myung Kim, Dongyeop Kang | 2023-06-14T18:36:33Z | cs.CL | This survey paper provides a comprehensive review of the use of diffusion
models in natural language processing (NLP). Diffusion models are a class of
mathematical models that aim to capture the diffusion of information or signals
across a network or manifold. In NLP, diffusion models have been used in a
variety of applications, such as natural language generation, sentiment
analysis, topic modeling, and machine translation. This paper discusses the
different formulations of diffusion models used in NLP, their strengths and
limitations, and their applications. We also perform a thorough comparison
between diffusion models and alternative generative models, specifically
highlighting the autoregressive (AR) models, while also examining how diverse
architectures incorporate the Transformer in conjunction with diffusion models.
Compared to AR models, diffusion models have significant advantages for
parallel generation, text interpolation, token-level controls such as syntactic
structures and semantic contents, and robustness. Exploring further
permutations of integrating Transformers into diffusion models would be a
valuable pursuit. Also, the development of multimodal diffusion models and
large-scale diffusion language models with notable capabilities for few-shot
learning would be important directions for the future advance of diffusion
models in NLP. | cs.CL | A Survey of Diffusion Models in Natural Language Processing |
2023-05-24T03:06:13Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14663v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14663v2 | Naihao Deng, Xinliang Frederick Zhang, Siyang Liu, Winston Wu, Lu Wang, Rada Mihalcea | 2023-10-22T17:10:54Z | cs.CL | Annotator disagreement is ubiquitous in natural language processing (NLP)
tasks. There are multiple reasons for such disagreements, including the
subjectivity of the task, difficult cases, unclear guidelines, and so on.
Rather than simply aggregating labels to obtain data annotations, we instead
try to directly model the diverse perspectives of the annotators, and
explicitly account for annotators' idiosyncrasies in the modeling process by
creating representations for each annotator (annotator embeddings) and also
their annotations (annotation embeddings). In addition, we propose TID-8, The
Inherent Disagreement - 8 dataset, a benchmark that consists of eight existing
language understanding datasets that have inherent annotator disagreement. We
test our approach on TID-8 and show that our approach helps models learn
significantly better from disagreements on six different datasets in TID-8
while increasing model size by fewer than 1% parameters. By capturing the
unique tendencies and subjectivity of individual annotators through embeddings,
our representations prime AI models to be inclusive of diverse viewpoints. | cs.CL | You Are What You Annotate: Towards Better Models through Annotator Representations |
2023-05-24T02:53:48Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14660v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14660v1 | Anna Martin-Boyle, Andrew Head, Kyle Lo, Risham Sidhu, Marti A. Hearst, Dongyeop Kang | 2023-05-24T02:53:48Z | cs.CL, I.2.7 | Mathematical symbol definition extraction is important for improving
scholarly reading interfaces and scholarly information extraction (IE).
However, the task poses several challenges: math symbols are difficult to
process as they are not composed of natural language morphemes; and scholarly
papers often contain sentences that require resolving complex coordinate
structures. We present SymDef, an English language dataset of 5,927 sentences
from full-text scientific papers where each sentence is annotated with all
mathematical symbols linked with their corresponding definitions. This dataset
focuses specifically on complex coordination structures such as "respectively"
constructions, which often contain overlapping definition spans. We also
introduce a new definition extraction method that masks mathematical symbols,
creates a copy of each sentence for each symbol, specifies a target symbol, and
predicts its corresponding definition spans using slot filling. Our experiments
show that our definition extraction model significantly outperforms RoBERTa and
other strong IE baseline systems by 10.9 points with a macro F1 score of 84.82.
With our dataset and model, we can detect complex definitions in scholarly
documents to make scientific writing more readable. | cs.CL | Complex Mathematical Symbol Definition Structures: A Dataset and Model for Coordination Resolution in Definition Extraction |
2023-05-24T02:53:22Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14659v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14659v2 | Ishani Mondal, Michelle Yuan, Anandhavelu N, Aparna Garimella, Francis Ferraro, Andrew Blair-Stanek, Benjamin Van Durme, Jordan Boyd-Graber | 2023-11-17T17:31:52Z | cs.CL | Learning template based information extraction from documents is a crucial
yet difficult task. Prior template-based IE approaches assume foreknowledge of
the domain templates; however, real-world IE do not have pre-defined schemas
and it is a figure-out-as you go phenomena. To quickly bootstrap templates in a
real-world setting, we need to induce template slots from documents with zero
or minimal supervision. Since the purpose of question answering intersect with
the goal of information extraction, we use automatic question generation to
induce template slots from the documents and investigate how a tiny amount of a
proxy human-supervision on-the-fly (termed as InteractiveIE) can further boost
the performance. Extensive experiments on biomedical and legal documents, where
obtaining training data is expensive, reveal encouraging trends of performance
improvement using InteractiveIE over AI-only baseline. | cs.CL | InteractiveIE: Towards Assessing the Strength of Human-AI Collaboration in Improving the Performance of Information Extraction |
2023-05-24T02:52:48Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14658v3 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14658v3 | Yongkang Liu, Shi Feng, Daling Wang, Yifei Zhang, Hinrich Schütze | 2024-05-05T17:47:48Z | cs.CL | LLMs (large language models) such as ChatGPT have shown remarkable language
understanding and generation capabilities. Although reference-free evaluators
based on LLMs show better human alignment than traditional reference-based
evaluators, there are many challenges in using reference-free evaluators based
on LLMs. Reference-free evaluators are more suitable for open-ended examples
with different semantics responses. But not all examples are open-ended. For
closed-ended examples with unique correct semantic response, reference-free
evaluators will still consider it high quality when giving a response that is
inconsistent with the facts and the semantic of reference. In order to
comprehensively evaluate the reliability of evaluators based on LLMs, we
construct two adversarial meta-evaluation dialogue generation datasets
KdConv-ADV and DSTC7-ADV based on KdConv and DSTC7-AVSD, respectively. Compared
to previous meta-evaluation benchmarks, KdConv-ADV and DSTC7-ADV are much more
challenging since they requires evaluators to be able to reasonably evaluate
closed-ended examples with the help of external knowledge or even its own
knowledge. Empirical results show that the ability of LLMs to identify
unreasonable responses is insufficient. There are risks in using eference-free
evaluators based on LLMs to evaluate the quality of dialogue responses. | cs.CL | Evaluate What You Can't Evaluate: Unassessable Quality for Generated Response |
2023-05-24T02:39:43Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14652v3 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14652v3 | Shaoxiang Wu, Damai Dai, Ziwei Qin, Tianyu Liu, Binghuai Lin, Yunbo Cao, Zhifang Sui | 2023-05-31T08:20:33Z | cs.CL | Video multimodal fusion aims to integrate multimodal signals in videos, such
as visual, audio and text, to make a complementary prediction with multiple
modalities contents. However, unlike other image-text multimodal tasks, video
has longer multimodal sequences with more redundancy and noise in both visual
and audio modalities. Prior denoising methods like forget gate are coarse in
the granularity of noise filtering. They often suppress the redundant and noisy
information at the risk of losing critical information. Therefore, we propose a
denoising bottleneck fusion (DBF) model for fine-grained video multimodal
fusion. On the one hand, we employ a bottleneck mechanism to filter out noise
and redundancy with a restrained receptive field. On the other hand, we use a
mutual information maximization module to regulate the filter-out module to
preserve key information within different modalities. Our DBF model achieves
significant improvement over current state-of-the-art baselines on multiple
benchmarks covering multimodal sentiment analysis and multimodal summarization
tasks. It proves that our model can effectively capture salient features from
noisy and redundant video, audio, and text inputs. The code for this paper is
publicly available at https://github.com/WSXRHFG/DBF. | cs.CL | Denoising Bottleneck with Mutual Information Maximization for Video Multimodal Fusion |
2023-05-24T02:39:20Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14651v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14651v2 | Lingbing Guo, Zhuo Chen, Jiaoyan Chen, Yin Fang, Wen Zhang, Huajun Chen | 2024-02-24T06:48:20Z | cs.CL, cs.IR, cs.LG | Recent embedding-based methods have achieved great successes in exploiting
entity alignment from knowledge graph (KG) embeddings of multiple modalities.
In this paper, we study embedding-based entity alignment (EEA) from a
perspective of generative models. We show that EEA shares similarities with
typical generative models and prove the effectiveness of the recently developed
generative adversarial network (GAN)-based EEA methods theoretically. We then
reveal that their incomplete objective limits the capacity on both entity
alignment and entity synthesis (i.e., generating new entities). We mitigate
this problem by introducing a generative EEA (GEEA) framework with the proposed
mutual variational autoencoder (M-VAE) as the generative model. M-VAE enables
entity conversion between KGs and generation of new entities from random noise
vectors. We demonstrate the power of GEEA with theoretical analysis and
empirical experiments on both entity alignment and entity synthesis tasks. | cs.CL | Revisit and Outstrip Entity Alignment: A Perspective of Generative Models |
2023-05-24T02:33:35Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14647v3 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14647v3 | Qi Zeng, Mankeerat Sidhu, Ansel Blume, Hou Pong Chan, Lu Wang, Heng Ji | 2024-06-16T03:44:52Z | cs.CL | Opinions in scientific research papers can be divergent, leading to
controversies among reviewers. However, most existing datasets for opinion
summarization are centered around product reviews and assume that the analyzed
opinions are non-controversial, failing to account for the variability seen in
other contexts such as academic papers, political debates, or social media
discussions. To address this gap, we propose the task of scientific opinion
summarization, where research paper reviews are synthesized into meta-reviews.
To facilitate this task, we introduce the ORSUM dataset covering 15,062 paper
meta-reviews and 57,536 paper reviews from 47 conferences. Furthermore, we
propose the Checklist-guided Iterative Introspection approach, which breaks
down scientific opinion summarization into several stages, iteratively refining
the summary under the guidance of questions from a checklist. Our experiments
show that (1) human-written summaries do not always satisfy all necessary
criteria such as depth of discussion, and identifying consensus and controversy
for the specific domain, and (2) the combination of task decomposition and
iterative self-refinement shows strong potential for enhancing the opinions and
can be applied to other complex text generation using black-box LLMs. | cs.CL | Scientific Opinion Summarization: Paper Meta-review Generation Dataset, Methods, and Evaluation |
2023-05-24T02:30:31Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14645v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14645v1 | Xiaochu Li, Minqian Liu, Zhiyang Xu, Lifu Huang | 2023-05-24T02:30:31Z | cs.CL | Biomedical entity linking and event extraction are two crucial tasks to
support text understanding and retrieval in the biomedical domain. These two
tasks intrinsically benefit each other: entity linking disambiguates the
biomedical concepts by referring to external knowledge bases and the domain
knowledge further provides additional clues to understand and extract the
biological processes, while event extraction identifies a key trigger and
entities involved to describe each biological process which also captures the
structural context to better disambiguate the biomedical entities. However,
previous research typically solves these two tasks separately or in a pipeline,
leading to error propagation. What's more, it's even more challenging to solve
these two tasks together as there is no existing dataset that contains
annotations for both tasks. To solve these challenges, we propose joint
biomedical entity linking and event extraction by regarding the event
structures and entity references in knowledge bases as latent variables and
updating the two task-specific models in a hard Expectation-Maximization (EM)
fashion: (1) predicting the missing variables for each partially annotated
dataset based on the current two task-specific models, and (2) updating the
parameters of each model on the corresponding pseudo completed dataset.
Experimental results on two benchmark datasets: Genia 2011 for event extraction
and BC4GO for entity linking, show that our joint framework significantly
improves the model for each individual task and outperforms the strong
baselines for both tasks. We will make the code and model checkpoints publicly
available once the paper is accepted. | cs.CL | Iteratively Improving Biomedical Entity Linking and Event Extraction via Hard Expectation-Maximization |
2023-05-24T02:13:48Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14635v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14635v2 | Yan Zhou, Qingkai Fang, Yang Feng | 2023-05-25T08:55:41Z | cs.CL, cs.AI, cs.SD, eess.AS | End-to-end speech translation (ST) is the task of translating speech signals
in the source language into text in the target language. As a cross-modal task,
end-to-end ST is difficult to train with limited data. Existing methods often
try to transfer knowledge from machine translation (MT), but their performances
are restricted by the modality gap between speech and text. In this paper, we
propose Cross-modal Mixup via Optimal Transport CMOT to overcome the modality
gap. We find the alignment between speech and text sequences via optimal
transport and then mix up the sequences from different modalities at a token
level using the alignment. Experiments on the MuST-C ST benchmark demonstrate
that CMOT achieves an average BLEU of 30.0 in 8 translation directions,
outperforming previous methods. Further analysis shows CMOT can adaptively find
the alignment between modalities, which helps alleviate the modality gap
between speech and text. Code is publicly available at
https://github.com/ictnlp/CMOT. | cs.CL | CMOT: Cross-modal Mixup via Optimal Transport for Speech Translation |
2023-05-24T02:05:03Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.16339v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.16339v2 | Xiang Zhang, Senyu Li, Bradley Hauer, Ning Shi, Grzegorz Kondrak | 2023-10-24T04:38:52Z | cs.CL, cs.AI | Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional natural language
understanding abilities and have excelled in a variety of natural language
processing (NLP)tasks in recent years. Despite the fact that most LLMs are
trained predominantly in English, multiple studies have demonstrated their
comparative performance in many other languages. However, fundamental questions
persist regarding how LLMs acquire their multi-lingual abilities and how
performance varies across different languages. These inquiries are crucial for
the study of LLMs since users and researchers often come from diverse language
backgrounds, potentially influencing their utilization and interpretation of
LLMs' results. In this work, we propose a systematic way of qualifying the
performance disparities of LLMs under multilingual settings. We investigate the
phenomenon of across-language generalizations in LLMs, wherein insufficient
multi-lingual training data leads to advanced multi-lingual capabilities. To
accomplish this, we employ a novel back-translation-based prompting method. The
results show that GPT exhibits highly translating-like behaviour in
multilingual settings. | cs.CL | Don't Trust ChatGPT when Your Question is not in English: A Study of Multilingual Abilities and Types of LLMs |
2023-05-24T02:03:23Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14630v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14630v1 | Sam Musker, Ellie Pavlick | 2023-05-24T02:03:23Z | cs.CL, I.2.7 | Large Language Models (LLMs) have driven extraordinary improvements in NLP.
However, it is unclear how such models represent lexical concepts-i.e., the
meanings of the words they use. This paper evaluates the lexical
representations of GPT-3 and GPT-4 through the lens of HIPE theory, a theory of
concept representations which focuses on representations of words describing
artifacts (such as "mop", "pencil", and "whistle"). The theory posits a causal
graph that relates the meanings of such words to the form, use, and history of
the objects to which they refer. We test LLMs using the same stimuli originally
used by Chaigneau et al. (2004) to evaluate the theory in humans, and consider
a variety of prompt designs. Our experiments concern judgements about causal
outcomes, object function, and object naming. We find no evidence that GPT-3
encodes the causal structure hypothesized by HIPE, but do find evidence that
GPT-4 encodes such structure. The results contribute to a growing body of
research characterizing the representational capacity of large language models. | cs.CL | Testing Causal Models of Word Meaning in GPT-3 and -4 |
2023-05-24T02:00:51Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14628v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14628v2 | Chenglei Si, Weijia Shi, Chen Zhao, Luke Zettlemoyer, Jordan Boyd-Graber | 2023-10-20T05:16:29Z | cs.CL, cs.AI | While recent large language models (LLMs) improve on various question
answering (QA) datasets, it remains difficult for a single model to generalize
across question types that require distinct reasoning abilities. We provide
empirical evidence that state-of-the-art LLMs suffer from poor generalizability
on reasoning types beyond those seen in the prompt. To remedy this, we propose
a Mixture-of-Reasoning-Experts (MoRE) framework that ensembles diverse
specialized language models. We specialize the backbone language model with
prompts optimized for different reasoning categories, including factual,
multihop, mathematical, and commonsense reasoning. Our key insight is to
leverage agreement among the specialized experts to select the best answer for
each question, or to abstain from answering. This gives MoRE higher accuracy
than any single specialized model on a collection of 12 QA datasets from four
reasoning types. Beyond generalizability, the interpretable design of MoRE
improves selective question answering results compared to baselines without
incorporating inter-expert agreement. This framework is also more interpretable
and useful to human consumers of QA outputs. Our human study confirms that
presenting expert predictions and the answer selection process helps annotators
more accurately calibrate when to trust the system's output. We release all
code and data to facilitate future work. | cs.CL | Getting MoRE out of Mixture of Language Model Reasoning Experts |
2023-05-24T01:53:49Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14627v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14627v2 | Tianyu Gao, Howard Yen, Jiatong Yu, Danqi Chen | 2023-10-31T15:04:35Z | cs.CL, cs.IR, cs.LG | Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as a widely-used tool for
information seeking, but their generated outputs are prone to hallucination. In
this work, our aim is to allow LLMs to generate text with citations, improving
their factual correctness and verifiability. Existing work mainly relies on
commercial search engines and human evaluation, making it challenging to
reproduce and compare different modeling approaches. We propose ALCE, the first
benchmark for Automatic LLMs' Citation Evaluation. ALCE collects a diverse set
of questions and retrieval corpora and requires building end-to-end systems to
retrieve supporting evidence and generate answers with citations. We develop
automatic metrics along three dimensions -- fluency, correctness, and citation
quality -- and demonstrate their strong correlation with human judgements. Our
experiments with state-of-the-art LLMs and novel prompting strategies show that
current systems have considerable room for improvement -- For example, on the
ELI5 dataset, even the best models lack complete citation support 50% of the
time. Our analyses further highlight promising future directions, including
developing better retrievers, advancing long-context LLMs, and improving the
ability to synthesize information from multiple sources. | cs.CL | Enabling Large Language Models to Generate Text with Citations |
2023-05-24T01:48:33Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14625v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14625v1 | Shufan Wang, Yixiao Song, Andrew Drozdov, Aparna Garimella, Varun Manjunatha, Mohit Iyyer | 2023-05-24T01:48:33Z | cs.CL | In this paper, we study the generation quality of interpolation-based
retrieval-augmented language models (LMs). These methods, best exemplified by
the KNN-LM, interpolate the LM's predicted distribution of the next word with a
distribution formed from the most relevant retrievals for a given prefix. While
the KNN-LM and related methods yield impressive decreases in perplexity, we
discover that they do not exhibit corresponding improvements in open-ended
generation quality, as measured by both automatic evaluation metrics (e.g.,
MAUVE) and human evaluations. Digging deeper, we find that interpolating with a
retrieval distribution actually increases perplexity compared to a baseline
Transformer LM for the majority of tokens in the WikiText-103 test set, even
though the overall perplexity is lower due to a smaller number of tokens for
which perplexity dramatically decreases after interpolation. However, when
decoding a long sequence at inference time, significant improvements on this
smaller subset of tokens are washed out by slightly worse predictions on most
tokens. Furthermore, we discover that the entropy of the retrieval distribution
increases faster than that of the base LM as the generated sequence becomes
longer, which indicates that retrieval is less reliable when using
model-generated text as queries (i.e., is subject to exposure bias). We hope
that our analysis spurs future work on improved decoding algorithms and
interpolation strategies for retrieval-augmented language models. | cs.CL | KNN-LM Does Not Improve Open-ended Text Generation |
2023-05-24T01:46:07Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14623v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14623v2 | Miaoran Li, Baolin Peng, Michel Galley, Jianfeng Gao, Zhu Zhang | 2024-04-01T03:23:23Z | cs.CL | Fact-checking is an essential task in NLP that is commonly utilized for
validating the factual accuracy of claims. Prior work has mainly focused on
fine-tuning pre-trained languages models on specific datasets, which can be
computationally intensive and time-consuming. With the rapid development of
large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT and GPT-3, researchers are now
exploring their in-context learning capabilities for a wide range of tasks. In
this paper, we aim to assess the capacity of LLMs for fact-checking by
introducing Self-Checker, a framework comprising a set of plug-and-play modules
that facilitate fact-checking by purely prompting LLMs in an almost zero-shot
setting. This framework provides a fast and efficient way to construct
fact-checking systems in low-resource environments. Empirical results
demonstrate the potential of Self-Checker in utilizing LLMs for fact-checking.
However, there is still significant room for improvement compared to SOTA
fine-tuned models, which suggests that LLM adoption could be a promising
approach for future fact-checking research. | cs.CL | Self-Checker: Plug-and-Play Modules for Fact-Checking with Large Language Models |
2023-05-24T01:40:57Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14622v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14622v1 | Debaditya Shome, Kuldeep Yadav | 2023-05-24T01:40:57Z | cs.CL, cs.LG | Large pre-trained language models (PLMs) have made significant progress in
encoding world knowledge and spawned a new set of learning paradigms including
zero-shot, few-shot, and in-context learning. Many language tasks can be
modeled as a set of prompts (for example, is this text about geography?) and
language models can provide binary answers, i.e., Yes or No. There is evidence
to suggest that the next-word prediction used by many PLMs does not align well
with zero-shot paradigms. Therefore, PLMs are fine-tuned as a
question-answering system. In-context learning extends zero-shot learning by
incorporating prompts and examples, resulting in increased task accuracy. Our
paper presents EXnet, a model specifically designed to perform in-context
learning without any limitations on the number of examples. We argue that
in-context learning is an effective method to increase task accuracy, and
providing examples facilitates cross-task generalization, especially when it
comes to text classification tasks. With extensive experiments, we show that
even our smallest model (15M parameters) generalizes to several unseen
classification tasks and domains. | cs.CL | EXnet: Efficient In-context Learning for Data-less Text classification |
2023-05-24T01:35:10Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14618v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14618v1 | Wenting Zhao, Justin T. Chiu, Claire Cardie, Alexander M. Rush | 2023-05-24T01:35:10Z | cs.CL, cs.AI | Abductive reasoning aims to find plausible explanations for an event. This
style of reasoning is critical for commonsense tasks where there are often
multiple plausible explanations. Existing approaches for abductive reasoning in
natural language processing (NLP) often rely on manually generated annotations
for supervision; however, such annotations can be subjective and biased.
Instead of using direct supervision, this work proposes an approach for
abductive commonsense reasoning that exploits the fact that only a subset of
explanations is correct for a given context. The method uses posterior
regularization to enforce a mutual exclusion constraint, encouraging the model
to learn the distinction between fluent explanations and plausible ones. We
evaluate our approach on a diverse set of abductive reasoning datasets;
experimental results show that our approach outperforms or is comparable to
directly applying pretrained language models in a zero-shot manner and other
knowledge-augmented zero-shot methods. | cs.CL | Abductive Commonsense Reasoning Exploiting Mutually Exclusive Explanations |
2023-05-24T01:35:01Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14617v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14617v2 | Sahithya Ravi, Raymond Ng, Vered Shwartz | 2023-10-23T06:49:57Z | cs.CL, cs.AI | Understanding the speaker's intended meaning often involves drawing
commonsense inferences to reason about what is not stated explicitly. In
multi-event sentences, it requires understanding the relationships between
events based on contextual knowledge. We propose COMET-M (Multi-Event), an
event-centric commonsense model capable of generating commonsense inferences
for a target event within a complex sentence. COMET-M builds upon COMET
(Bosselut et al., 2019), which excels at generating event-centric inferences
for simple sentences, but struggles with the complexity of multi-event
sentences prevalent in natural text. To overcome this limitation, we curate a
multi-event inference dataset of 35K human-written inferences. We trained
COMET-M on the human-written inferences and also created baselines using
automatically labeled examples. Experimental results demonstrate the
significant performance improvement of COMET-M over COMET in generating
multi-event inferences. Moreover, COMET-M successfully produces distinct
inferences for each target event, taking the complete context into
consideration. COMET-M holds promise for downstream tasks involving natural
text such as coreference resolution, dialogue, and story understanding. | cs.CL | COMET-M: Reasoning about Multiple Events in Complex Sentences |
2023-05-24T01:30:50Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14616v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14616v2 | Pin-Er Chen, Po-Ya Angela Wang, Hsin-Yu Chou, Yu-Hsiang Tseng, Shu-Kai Hsieh | 2023-10-24T11:30:07Z | cs.CL, cs.CV | This paper explores the grounding issue regarding multimodal semantic
representation from a computational cognitive-linguistic view. We annotate
images from the Flickr30k dataset with five perceptual properties: Affordance,
Perceptual Salience, Object Number, Gaze Cueing, and Ecological Niche
Association (ENA), and examine their association with textual elements in the
image captions. Our findings reveal that images with Gibsonian affordance show
a higher frequency of captions containing 'holding-verbs' and 'container-nouns'
compared to images displaying telic affordance. Perceptual Salience, Object
Number, and ENA are also associated with the choice of linguistic expressions.
Our study demonstrates that comprehensive understanding of objects or events
requires cognitive attention, semantic nuances in language, and integration
across multiple modalities. We highlight the vital importance of situated
meaning and affordance grounding in natural language understanding, with the
potential to advance human-like interpretation in various scenarios. | cs.CL | Exploring Affordance and Situated Meaning in Image Captions: A Multimodal Analysis |
2023-05-24T01:25:38Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14613v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14613v2 | Jeremy R. Cole, Michael J. Q. Zhang, Daniel Gillick, Julian Martin Eisenschlos, Bhuwan Dhingra, Jacob Eisenstein | 2023-11-15T02:15:02Z | cs.CL, cs.AI | Trustworthy language models should abstain from answering questions when they
do not know the answer. However, the answer to a question can be unknown for a
variety of reasons. Prior research has focused on the case in which the
question is clear and the answer is unambiguous but possibly unknown, but the
answer to a question can also be unclear due to uncertainty of the questioner's
intent or context. We investigate question answering from this perspective,
focusing on answering a subset of questions with a high degree of accuracy,
from a set of questions in which many are inherently ambiguous. In this
setting, we find that the most reliable approach to decide when to abstain
involves quantifying repetition within sampled model outputs, rather than the
model's likelihood or self-verification as used in prior work. We find this to
be the case across different types of uncertainty and model scales,and with or
without instruction tuning. Our results suggest that sampling-based confidence
scores help calibrate answers to relatively unambiguous questions, with more
dramatic improvements on ambiguous questions. | cs.CL | Selectively Answering Ambiguous Questions |
2023-05-24T01:20:22Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.16338v3 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.16338v3 | Jikun Kang, Romain Laroche, Xingdi Yuan, Adam Trischler, Xue Liu, Jie Fu | 2024-05-28T19:03:33Z | cs.LG, cs.AI, cs.CL | Decision Transformer-based decision-making agents have shown the ability to
generalize across multiple tasks. However, their performance relies on massive
data and computation. We argue that this inefficiency stems from the forgetting
phenomenon, in which a model memorizes its behaviors in parameters throughout
training. As a result, training on a new task may deteriorate the model's
performance on previous tasks. In contrast to LLMs' implicit memory mechanism,
the human brain utilizes distributed memory storage, which helps manage and
organize multiple skills efficiently, mitigating the forgetting phenomenon.
Inspired by this, we propose a working memory module to store, blend, and
retrieve information for different downstream tasks. Evaluation results show
that the proposed method improves training efficiency and generalization in
Atari games and Meta-World object manipulation tasks. Moreover, we demonstrate
that memory fine-tuning further enhances the adaptability of the proposed
architecture. | cs.LG | Think Before You Act: Decision Transformers with Working Memory |
2023-05-24T01:16:17Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14610v4 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14610v4 | Bryan Li, Samar Haider, Chris Callison-Burch | 2024-04-02T02:55:33Z | cs.CL | Do the Spratly Islands belong to China, the Philippines, or Vietnam? A
pretrained large language model (LLM) may answer differently if asked in the
languages of each claimant country: Chinese, Tagalog, or Vietnamese. This
contrasts with a multilingual human, who would likely answer consistently. In
this paper, we show that LLMs recall certain geographical knowledge
inconsistently when queried in different languages -- a phenomenon we term
geopolitical bias. As a targeted case study, we consider territorial disputes,
an inherently controversial and multilingual task. We introduce BorderLines, a
dataset of territorial disputes which covers 251 territories, each associated
with a set of multiple-choice questions in the languages of each claimant
country (49 languages in total). We also propose a suite of evaluation metrics
to precisely quantify bias and consistency in responses across different
languages. We then evaluate various multilingual LLMs on our dataset and
metrics to probe their internal knowledge and use the proposed metrics to
discover numerous inconsistencies in how these models respond in different
languages. Finally, we explore several prompt modification strategies, aiming
to either amplify or mitigate geopolitical bias, which highlights how brittle
LLMs are and how they tailor their responses depending on cues from the
interaction context. Our code and data are available at
https://github.com/manestay/borderlines | cs.CL | This Land is {Your, My} Land: Evaluating Geopolitical Biases in Language Models |
2023-05-24T00:57:35Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14603v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14603v2 | Li Zhang, Hainiu Xu, Abhinav Kommula, Chris Callison-Burch, Niket Tandon | 2024-01-25T18:15:31Z | cs.CL | Much text describes a changing world (e.g., procedures, stories, newswires),
and understanding them requires tracking how entities change. An earlier
dataset, OpenPI, provided crowdsourced annotations of entity state changes in
text. However, a major limitation was that those annotations were free-form and
did not identify salient changes, hampering model evaluation. To overcome these
limitations, we present an improved dataset, OpenPI2.0, where entities and
attributes are fully canonicalized and additional entity salience annotations
are added. On our fairer evaluation setting, we find that current
state-of-the-art language models are far from competent. We also show that
using state changes of salient entities as a chain-of-thought prompt,
downstream performance is improved on tasks such as question answering and
classical planning, outperforming the setting involving all related entities
indiscriminately. We offer OpenPI2.0 for the continued development of models
that can understand the dynamics of entities in text. | cs.CL | OpenPI2.0: An Improved Dataset for Entity Tracking in Texts |
2023-05-24T00:46:02Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14600v3 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14600v3 | Tao Li, Ghazaleh Kazeminejad, Susan W. Brown, Martha Palmer, Vivek Srikumar | 2023-10-19T22:34:41Z | cs.CL, cs.LG | Semantic role labeling (SRL) has multiple disjoint label sets, e.g., VerbNet
and PropBank. Creating these datasets is challenging, therefore a natural
question is how to use each one to help the other. Prior work has shown that
cross-task interaction helps, but only explored multitask learning so far. A
common issue with multi-task setup is that argument sequences are still
separately decoded, running the risk of generating structurally inconsistent
label sequences (as per lexicons like Semlink). In this paper, we eliminate
such issue with a framework that jointly models VerbNet and PropBank labels as
one sequence. In this setup, we show that enforcing Semlink constraints during
decoding constantly improves the overall F1. With special input constructions,
our joint model infers VerbNet arguments from given PropBank arguments with
over 99 F1. For learning, we propose a constrained marginal model that learns
with knowledge defined in Semlink to further benefit from the large amounts of
PropBank-only data. On the joint benchmark based on CoNLL05, our models achieve
state-of-the-art F1's, outperforming the prior best in-domain model by 3.5
(VerbNet) and 0.8 (PropBank). For out-of-domain generalization, our models
surpass the prior best by 3.4 (VerbNet) and 0.2 (PropBank). | cs.CL | Learning Semantic Role Labeling from Compatible Label Sequences |
2023-05-24T00:44:49Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14599v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14599v2 | James Y. Huang, Wenlin Yao, Kaiqiang Song, Hongming Zhang, Muhao Chen, Dong Yu | 2023-11-05T06:03:59Z | cs.CL | Traditional sentence embedding models encode sentences into vector
representations to capture useful properties such as the semantic similarity
between sentences. However, in addition to similarity, sentence semantics can
also be interpreted via compositional operations such as sentence fusion or
difference. It is unclear whether the compositional semantics of sentences can
be directly reflected as compositional operations in the embedding space. To
more effectively bridge the continuous embedding and discrete text spaces, we
explore the plausibility of incorporating various compositional properties into
the sentence embedding space that allows us to interpret embedding
transformations as compositional sentence operations. We propose InterSent, an
end-to-end framework for learning interpretable sentence embeddings that
supports compositional sentence operations in the embedding space. Our method
optimizes operator networks and a bottleneck encoder-decoder model to produce
meaningful and interpretable sentence embeddings. Experimental results
demonstrate that our method significantly improves the interpretability of
sentence embeddings on four textual generation tasks over existing approaches
while maintaining strong performance on traditional semantic similarity tasks. | cs.CL | Bridging Continuous and Discrete Spaces: Interpretable Sentence Representation Learning via Compositional Operations |
2023-05-24T00:40:49Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14597v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14597v1 | Yiwen Ding, Jiarui Liu, Zhiheng Lyu, Kun Zhang, Bernhard Schoelkopf, Zhijing Jin, Rada Mihalcea | 2023-05-24T00:40:49Z | cs.CL, cs.AI, cs.LG | While several previous studies have analyzed gender bias in research, we are
still missing a comprehensive analysis of gender differences in the AI
community, covering diverse topics and different development trends. Using the
AI Scholar dataset of 78K researchers in the field of AI, we identify several
gender differences: (1) Although female researchers tend to have fewer overall
citations than males, this citation difference does not hold for all
academic-age groups; (2) There exist large gender homophily in co-authorship on
AI papers; (3) Female first-authored papers show distinct linguistic styles,
such as longer text, more positive emotion words, and more catchy titles than
male first-authored papers. Our analysis provides a window into the current
demographic trends in our AI community, and encourages more gender equality and
diversity in the future. Our code and data are at
https://github.com/causalNLP/ai-scholar-gender. | cs.CL | Voices of Her: Analyzing Gender Differences in the AI Publication World |
2023-05-24T00:27:00Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14596v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14596v2 | Sarah Wiegreffe, Matthew Finlayson, Oyvind Tafjord, Peter Clark, Ashish Sabharwal | 2023-10-31T22:07:10Z | cs.CL, cs.LG | When pretrained language models (LMs) are applied to discriminative tasks
such as multiple-choice questions, they place probability mass on vocabulary
tokens that aren't among the given answer choices. Spreading probability mass
across multiple surface forms with identical meaning (such as "bath" and
"bathtub") is thought to cause an underestimation of a model's true
performance, referred to as the "surface form competition" (SFC) hypothesis.
This has motivated the introduction of various probability normalization
methods. However, many core questions remain unanswered. How do we measure SFC?
Are there direct ways of reducing it, and does doing so improve task
performance?
We propose a mathematical formalism for SFC which allows us to quantify and
bound its impact for the first time. We identify a simple method for reducing
it -- namely, increasing probability mass on the given answer choices by a)
including them in the prompt and b) using in-context learning with even just
one example. We show this method eliminates the impact of SFC in the majority
of instances. Our experiments on three diverse datasets and six LMs reveal
several additional surprising findings. For example, both normalization and
prompting methods for reducing SFC can be ineffective or even detrimental to
task performance for some LMs. We conclude with practical insights for
effectively prompting LMs for multiple-choice tasks. | cs.CL | Increasing Probability Mass on Answer Choices Does Not Always Improve Accuracy |
2023-05-24T00:17:36Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14592v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14592v2 | Ruohao Guo, Wei Xu, Alan Ritter | 2024-06-06T03:20:45Z | cs.CL, cs.LG | Language style is often used by writers to convey their intentions,
identities, and mastery of language. In this paper, we show that current large
language models struggle to capture some language styles without fine-tuning.
To address this challenge, we investigate whether LLMs can be meta-trained
based on representative lexicons to recognize new styles they have not been
fine-tuned on. Experiments on 13 established style classification tasks, as
well as 63 novel tasks generated using LLMs, demonstrate that meta-training
with style lexicons consistently improves zero-shot transfer across styles. We
release the code and data at http://github.com/octaviaguo/Style-LLM . | cs.CL | Meta-Tuning LLMs to Leverage Lexical Knowledge for Generalizable Language Style Understanding |
2023-05-24T00:10:15Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14591v3 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14591v3 | Kexun Zhang, Danqing Wang, Jingtao Xia, William Yang Wang, Lei Li | 2023-12-08T00:12:58Z | cs.CL, cs.SE | Large language models (LLMs) excel at implementing code from functionality
descriptions but struggle with algorithmic problems that require not only
implementation but also identification of the suitable algorithm. Moreover,
LLM-generated programs lack guaranteed correctness and require human
verification. To address these challenges, we propose ALGO, a framework that
synthesizes Algorithmic programs with LLM-Generated Oracles to guide the
generation and verify their correctness. ALGO first generates a reference
oracle by prompting an LLM to exhaustively enumerate all the combinations of
relevant variables. This oracle is then utilized to guide an arbitrary search
strategy in exploring the algorithm space and to verify the synthesized
algorithms. Our study shows that the LLM-generated oracles are correct for 88%
of the cases. With the oracles as verifiers, ALGO can be integrated with any
existing code generation model in a model-agnostic manner to enhance its
performance. Experiments show that when equipped with ALGO, we achieve an 8x
better one-submission pass rate over the Codex model and a 2.6x better
one-submission pass rate over CodeT, the current state-of-the-art model on
CodeContests. We can also get 1.3x better pass rate over the ChatGPT Code
Interpreter on unseen problems. The problem set we used for testing, the
prompts we used, the verifier and solution programs, and the test cases
generated by ALGO are available at https://github.com/zkx06111/ALGO. | cs.CL | ALGO: Synthesizing Algorithmic Programs with LLM-Generated Oracle Verifiers |
2023-05-24T00:07:40Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14590v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14590v2 | Pritika Ramu, Sijia Wang, Lalla Mouatadid, Joy Rimchala, Lifu Huang | 2024-06-04T01:32:18Z | cs.CL, cs.AI | Current research in form understanding predominantly relies on large
pre-trained language models, necessitating extensive data for pre-training.
However, the importance of layout structure (i.e., the spatial relationship
between the entity blocks in the visually rich document) to relation extraction
has been overlooked. In this paper, we propose REgion-Aware Relation Extraction
(RE$^2$) that leverages region-level spatial structure among the entity blocks
to improve their relation prediction. We design an edge-aware graph attention
network to learn the interaction between entities while considering their
spatial relationship defined by their region-level representations. We also
introduce a constraint objective to regularize the model towards consistency
with the inherent constraints of the relation extraction task. Extensive
experiments across various datasets, languages and domains demonstrate the
superiority of our proposed approach. | cs.CL | RE$^2$: Region-Aware Relation Extraction from Visually Rich Documents |
2023-05-23T23:53:58Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14588v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14588v1 | Sebastian Cadavid-Sanchez, Khalil Kacem, Rafael Aparecido Martins Frade, Johannes Boehm, Thomas Chaney, Danial Lashkari, Daniel Simig | 2023-05-23T23:53:58Z | cs.CL, cs.LG | To study social, economic, and historical questions, researchers in the
social sciences and humanities have started to use increasingly large
unstructured textual datasets. While recent advances in NLP provide many tools
to efficiently process such data, most existing approaches rely on generic
solutions whose performance and suitability for domain-specific tasks is not
well understood. This work presents an attempt to bridge this domain gap by
exploring the use of modern Entity Linking approaches for the enrichment of
museum collection data. We collect a dataset comprising of more than 1700 texts
annotated with 7,510 mention-entity pairs, evaluate some off-the-shelf
solutions in detail using this dataset and finally fine-tune a recent
end-to-end EL model on this data. We show that our fine-tuned model
significantly outperforms other approaches currently available in this domain
and present a proof-of-concept use case of this model. We release our dataset
and our best model. | cs.CL | Evaluating end-to-end entity linking on domain-specific knowledge bases: Learning about ancient technologies from museum collections |
2023-05-23T23:53:29Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14587v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14587v1 | Hamed Rahimi, Jacob Louis Hoover, David Mimno, Hubert Naacke, Camelia Constantin, Bernd Amann | 2023-05-23T23:53:29Z | cs.CL, cs.IR | The recent explosion in work on neural topic modeling has been criticized for
optimizing automated topic evaluation metrics at the expense of actual
meaningful topic identification. But human annotation remains expensive and
time-consuming. We propose LLM-based methods inspired by standard human topic
evaluations, in a family of metrics called Contextualized Topic Coherence
(CTC). We evaluate both a fully automated version as well as a semi-automated
CTC that allows human-centered evaluation of coherence while maintaining the
efficiency of automated methods. We evaluate CTC relative to five other metrics
on six topic models and find that it outperforms automated topic coherence
methods, works well on short documents, and is not susceptible to meaningless
but high-scoring topics. | cs.CL | Contextualized Topic Coherence Metrics |
2023-05-23T23:45:20Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14583v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14583v2 | Alexander Hoyle, Rupak Sarkar, Pranav Goel, Philip Resnik | 2023-10-25T00:08:17Z | cs.CL | When people interpret text, they rely on inferences that go beyond the
observed language itself. Inspired by this observation, we introduce a method
for the analysis of text that takes implicitly communicated content explicitly
into account. We use a large language model to produce sets of propositions
that are inferentially related to the text that has been observed, then
validate the plausibility of the generated content via human judgments.
Incorporating these explicit representations of implicit content proves useful
in multiple problem settings that involve the human interpretation of
utterances: assessing the similarity of arguments, making sense of a body of
opinion data, and modeling legislative behavior. Our results suggest that
modeling the meanings behind observed language, rather than the literal text
alone, is a valuable direction for NLP and particularly its applications to
social science. | cs.CL | Natural Language Decompositions of Implicit Content Enable Better Text Representations |
2023-05-23T23:37:29Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14580v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14580v2 | Lucas Rafael Stefanel Gris, Ricardo Marcacini, Arnaldo Candido Junior, Edresson Casanova, Anderson Soares, Sandra Maria Aluísio | 2023-05-26T12:09:55Z | cs.CL, cs.AI | Automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems play a key role in applications
involving human-machine interactions. Despite their importance, ASR models for
the Portuguese language proposed in the last decade have limitations in
relation to the correct identification of punctuation marks in automatic
transcriptions, which hinder the use of transcriptions by other systems,
models, and even by humans. However, recently Whisper ASR was proposed by
OpenAI, a general-purpose speech recognition model that has generated great
expectations in dealing with such limitations. This chapter presents the first
study on the performance of Whisper for punctuation prediction in the
Portuguese language. We present an experimental evaluation considering both
theoretical aspects involving pausing points (comma) and complete ideas
(exclamation, question, and fullstop), as well as practical aspects involving
transcript-based topic modeling - an application dependent on punctuation marks
for promising performance. We analyzed experimental results from videos of
Museum of the Person, a virtual museum that aims to tell and preserve people's
life histories, thus discussing the pros and cons of Whisper in a real-world
scenario. Although our experiments indicate that Whisper achieves
state-of-the-art results, we conclude that some punctuation marks require
improvements, such as exclamation, semicolon and colon. | cs.CL | Evaluating OpenAI's Whisper ASR for Punctuation Prediction and Topic Modeling of life histories of the Museum of the Person |
2023-05-23T23:31:24Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14578v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14578v2 | Margarita Bugueño, Gerard de Melo | 2024-01-22T14:13:51Z | cs.CL | Given the success of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) for structure-aware machine
learning, many studies have explored their use for text classification, but
mostly in specific domains with limited data characteristics. Moreover, some
strategies prior to GNNs relied on graph mining and classical machine learning,
making it difficult to assess their effectiveness in modern settings. This work
extensively investigates graph representation methods for text classification,
identifying practical implications and open challenges. We compare different
graph construction schemes using a variety of GNN architectures and setups
across five datasets, encompassing short and long documents as well as
unbalanced scenarios in diverse domains. Two Transformer-based large language
models are also included to complement the study. The results show that i)
although the effectiveness of graphs depends on the textual input features and
domain, simple graph constructions perform better the longer the documents are,
ii) graph representations are especially beneficial for longer documents,
outperforming Transformer-based models, iii) graph methods are particularly
efficient at solving the task. | cs.CL | Connecting the Dots: What Graph-Based Text Representations Work Best for Text Classification Using Graph Neural Networks? |
2023-05-23T23:31:02Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14577v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14577v2 | Alex Wilf, Syeda Nahida Akter, Leena Mathur, Paul Pu Liang, Sheryl Mathew, Mengrou Shou, Eric Nyberg, Louis-Philippe Morency | 2023-10-17T21:03:10Z | cs.LG, cs.CL | The self-supervised objective of masking-and-predicting has led to promising
performance gains on a variety of downstream tasks. However, while most
approaches randomly mask tokens, there is strong intuition that deciding what
to mask can substantially improve learning outcomes. We investigate this in
continued pretraining setting in which pretrained models continue to pretrain
on domain-specific data before performing some downstream task. We introduce
Difference-Masking, a masking strategy that automatically chooses what to mask
during continued pretraining by considering what makes a task domain different
from the pretraining domain. Empirically, we find that Difference-Masking
outperforms baselines on continued pretraining settings across four diverse
language-only and multimodal video tasks. | cs.LG | Difference-Masking: Choosing What to Mask in Continued Pretraining |
2023-05-23T23:27:20Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14576v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14576v2 | Josip Jukić, Jan Šnajder | 2023-10-23T13:58:26Z | cs.CL | Pre-trained language models (PLMs) have ignited a surge in demand for
effective fine-tuning techniques, particularly in low-resource domains and
languages. Active learning (AL), a set of algorithms designed to decrease
labeling costs by minimizing label complexity, has shown promise in confronting
the labeling bottleneck. In parallel, adapter modules designed for
parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) have demonstrated notable potential in
low-resource settings. However, the interplay between AL and adapter-based PEFT
remains unexplored. We present an empirical study of PEFT behavior with AL in
low-resource settings for text classification tasks. Our findings affirm the
superiority of PEFT over full-fine tuning (FFT) in low-resource settings and
demonstrate that this advantage persists in AL setups. We further examine the
properties of PEFT and FFT through the lens of forgetting dynamics and
instance-level representations, where we find that PEFT yields more stable
representations of early and middle layers compared to FFT. Our research
underscores the synergistic potential of AL and PEFT in low-resource settings,
paving the way for advancements in efficient and effective fine-tuning. | cs.CL | Parameter-Efficient Language Model Tuning with Active Learning in Low-Resource Settings |
2023-05-23T23:23:49Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14574v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14574v1 | Erin George, Joyce Chew, Deanna Needell | 2023-05-23T23:23:49Z | cs.CL, cs.LG | Societal biases in the usage of words, including harmful stereotypes, are
frequently learned by common word embedding methods. These biases manifest not
only between a word and an explicit marker of its stereotype, but also between
words that share related stereotypes. This latter phenomenon, sometimes called
"indirect bias,'' has resisted prior attempts at debiasing. In this paper, we
propose a novel method called Biased Indirect Relationship Modification (BIRM)
to mitigate indirect bias in distributional word embeddings by modifying biased
relationships between words before embeddings are learned. This is done by
considering how the co-occurrence probability of a given pair of words changes
in the presence of words marking an attribute of bias, and using this to
average out the effect of a bias attribute. To evaluate this method, we perform
a series of common tests and demonstrate that measures of bias in the word
embeddings are reduced in exchange for minor reduction in the semantic quality
of the embeddings. In addition, we conduct novel tests for measuring indirect
stereotypes by extending the Word Embedding Association Test (WEAT) with new
test sets for indirect binary gender stereotypes. With these tests, we
demonstrate the presence of more subtle stereotypes not addressed by previous
work. The proposed method is able to reduce the presence of some of these new
stereotypes, serving as a crucial next step towards non-stereotyped word
embeddings. | cs.CL | Detecting and Mitigating Indirect Stereotypes in Word Embeddings |
2023-05-23T23:22:20Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14571v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14571v2 | Li Sun, Florian Luisier, Kayhan Batmanghelich, Dinei Florencio, Cha Zhang | 2023-05-30T03:36:13Z | cs.CL | Current state-of-the-art models for natural language understanding require a
preprocessing step to convert raw text into discrete tokens. This process known
as tokenization relies on a pre-built vocabulary of words or sub-word
morphemes. This fixed vocabulary limits the model's robustness to spelling
errors and its capacity to adapt to new domains. In this work, we introduce a
novel open-vocabulary language model that adopts a hierarchical two-level
approach: one at the word level and another at the sequence level. Concretely,
we design an intra-word module that uses a shallow Transformer architecture to
learn word representations from their characters, and a deep inter-word
Transformer module that contextualizes each word representation by attending to
the entire word sequence. Our model thus directly operates on character
sequences with explicit awareness of word boundaries, but without biased
sub-word or word-level vocabulary. Experiments on various downstream tasks show
that our method outperforms strong baselines. We also demonstrate that our
hierarchical model is robust to textual corruption and domain shift. | cs.CL | From Characters to Words: Hierarchical Pre-trained Language Model for Open-vocabulary Language Understanding |
2023-05-23T23:14:38Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14569v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14569v1 | Srijan Bansal, Semih Yavuz, Bo Pang, Meghana Bhat, Yingbo Zhou | 2023-05-23T23:14:38Z | cs.CL | Question-answering (QA) tasks often investigate specific question types,
knowledge domains, or reasoning skills, leading to specialized models catering
to specific categories of QA tasks. While recent research has explored the idea
of unified QA models, such models are usually explored for high-resource
scenarios and require re-training to extend their capabilities. To overcome
these drawbacks, the paper explores the potential of two paradigms of tuning,
model, and prompts, for unified QA under a low-resource setting. The paper
provides an exhaustive analysis of their applicability using 16 QA datasets,
revealing that prompt tuning can perform as well as model tuning in a few-shot
setting with a good initialization. The study also shows that parameter-sharing
results in superior few-shot performance, simple knowledge transfer techniques
for prompt initialization can be effective, and prompt tuning achieves a
significant performance boost from pre-training in a low-resource regime. The
research offers insights into the advantages and limitations of prompt tuning
for unified QA in a few-shot setting, contributing to the development of
effective and efficient systems in low-resource scenarios. | cs.CL | Few-shot Unified Question Answering: Tuning Models or Prompts? |
2023-05-23T23:06:04Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14564v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14564v1 | Simeng Sun, Yang Liu, Shuohang Wang, Chenguang Zhu, Mohit Iyyer | 2023-05-23T23:06:04Z | cs.CL | Strategies such as chain-of-thought prompting improve the performance of
large language models (LLMs) on complex reasoning tasks by decomposing input
examples into intermediate steps. However, it remains unclear how to apply such
methods to reason over long input documents, in which both the decomposition
and the output of each intermediate step are non-trivial to obtain. In this
work, we propose PEARL, a prompting framework to improve reasoning over long
documents, which consists of three stages: action mining, plan formulation, and
plan execution. More specifically, given a question about a long document,
PEARL decomposes the question into a sequence of actions (e.g., SUMMARIZE,
FIND_EVENT, FIND_RELATION) and then executes them over the document to obtain
the answer. Each stage of PEARL is implemented via zero-shot or few-shot
prompting of LLMs (in our work, GPT-4) with minimal human input. We evaluate
PEARL on a challenging subset of the QuALITY dataset, which contains questions
that require complex reasoning over long narrative texts. PEARL outperforms
zero-shot and chain-of-thought prompting on this dataset, and ablation
experiments show that each stage of PEARL is critical to its performance.
Overall, PEARL is a first step towards leveraging LLMs to reason over long
documents. | cs.CL | PEARL: Prompting Large Language Models to Plan and Execute Actions Over Long Documents |
2023-05-23T22:31:01Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14556v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14556v1 | Tiziano Labruna, Sofia Brenna, Andrea Zaninello, Bernardo Magnini | 2023-05-23T22:31:01Z | cs.CL, cs.AI | Large pre-trained language models have exhibited unprecedented capabilities
in producing high-quality text via prompting techniques. This fact introduces
new possibilities for data collection and annotation, particularly in
situations where such data is scarce, complex to gather, expensive, or even
sensitive. In this paper, we explore the potential of these models to generate
and annotate goal-oriented dialogues, and conduct an in-depth analysis to
evaluate their quality. Our experiments employ ChatGPT, and encompass three
categories of goal-oriented dialogues (task-oriented, collaborative, and
explanatory), two generation modes (interactive and one-shot), and two
languages (English and Italian). Based on extensive human-based evaluations, we
demonstrate that the quality of generated dialogues and annotations is on par
with those generated by humans. | cs.CL | Unraveling ChatGPT: A Critical Analysis of AI-Generated Goal-Oriented Dialogues and Annotations |
2023-05-23T22:30:43Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14555v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14555v1 | Yuxin Ren, Qipeng Guo, Zhijing Jin, Shauli Ravfogel, Mrinmaya Sachan, Bernhard Schölkopf, Ryan Cotterell | 2023-05-23T22:30:43Z | cs.CL, cs.AI, cs.LG | Transformer models bring propelling advances in various NLP tasks, thus
inducing lots of interpretability research on the learned representations of
the models. However, we raise a fundamental question regarding the reliability
of the representations. Specifically, we investigate whether transformers learn
essentially isomorphic representation spaces, or those that are sensitive to
the random seeds in their pretraining process. In this work, we formulate the
Bijection Hypothesis, which suggests the use of bijective methods to align
different models' representation spaces. We propose a model based on invertible
neural networks, BERT-INN, to learn the bijection more effectively than other
existing bijective methods such as the canonical correlation analysis (CCA). We
show the advantage of BERT-INN both theoretically and through extensive
experiments, and apply it to align the reproduced BERT embeddings to draw
insights that are meaningful to the interpretability research. Our code is at
https://github.com/twinkle0331/BERT-similarity. | cs.CL | All Roads Lead to Rome? Exploring the Invariance of Transformers' Representations |
2023-05-23T22:24:44Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14552v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14552v2 | Nick McKenna, Tianyi Li, Liang Cheng, Mohammad Javad Hosseini, Mark Johnson, Mark Steedman | 2023-10-22T21:22:29Z | cs.CL, cs.AI | Large Language Models (LLMs) are claimed to be capable of Natural Language
Inference (NLI), necessary for applied tasks like question answering and
summarization. We present a series of behavioral studies on several LLM
families (LLaMA, GPT-3.5, and PaLM) which probe their behavior using controlled
experiments. We establish two biases originating from pretraining which predict
much of their behavior, and show that these are major sources of hallucination
in generative LLMs. First, memorization at the level of sentences: we show
that, regardless of the premise, models falsely label NLI test samples as
entailing when the hypothesis is attested in training data, and that entities
are used as ``indices'' to access the memorized data. Second, statistical
patterns of usage learned at the level of corpora: we further show a similar
effect when the premise predicate is less frequent than that of the hypothesis
in the training data, a bias following from previous studies. We demonstrate
that LLMs perform significantly worse on NLI test samples which do not conform
to these biases than those which do, and we offer these as valuable controls
for future LLM evaluation. | cs.CL | Sources of Hallucination by Large Language Models on Inference Tasks |
2023-05-23T22:11:47Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14548v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14548v1 | Hou Pong Chan, Qi Zeng, Heng Ji | 2023-05-23T22:11:47Z | cs.CL | Existing factual consistency evaluation approaches for text summarization
provide binary predictions and limited insights into the weakness of
summarization systems. Therefore, we propose the task of fine-grained
inconsistency detection, the goal of which is to predict the fine-grained types
of factual errors in a summary. Motivated by how humans inspect factual
inconsistency in summaries, we propose an interpretable fine-grained
inconsistency detection model, FineGrainFact, which explicitly represents the
facts in the documents and summaries with semantic frames extracted by semantic
role labeling, and highlights the related semantic frames to predict
inconsistency. The highlighted semantic frames help verify predicted error
types and correct inconsistent summaries. Experiment results demonstrate that
our model outperforms strong baselines and provides evidence to support or
refute the summary. | cs.CL | Interpretable Automatic Fine-grained Inconsistency Detection in Text Summarization |
2023-05-23T22:02:55Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14546v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14546v1 | Vamsikrishna Chemudupati, Marzieh Tahaei, Heitor Guimaraes, Arthur Pimentel, Anderson Avila, Mehdi Rezagholizadeh, Boxing Chen, Tiago Falk | 2023-05-23T22:02:55Z | eess.AS, cs.CL, cs.LG, cs.SD | Large self-supervised pre-trained speech models have achieved remarkable
success across various speech-processing tasks. The self-supervised training of
these models leads to universal speech representations that can be used for
different downstream tasks, ranging from automatic speech recognition (ASR) to
speaker identification. Recently, Whisper, a transformer-based model was
proposed and trained on large amount of weakly supervised data for ASR; it
outperformed several state-of-the-art self-supervised models. Given the
superiority of Whisper for ASR, in this paper we explore the transferability of
the representation for four other speech tasks in SUPERB benchmark. Moreover,
we explore the robustness of Whisper representation for ``in the wild'' tasks
where speech is corrupted by environment noise and room reverberation.
Experimental results show Whisper achieves promising results across tasks and
environmental conditions, thus showing potential for cross-task real-world
deployment. | eess.AS | On the Transferability of Whisper-based Representations for "In-the-Wild" Cross-Task Downstream Speech Applications |
2023-05-23T21:50:06Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14540v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14540v1 | Philippe Laban, Wojciech Kryściński, Divyansh Agarwal, Alexander R. Fabbri, Caiming Xiong, Shafiq Joty, Chien-Sheng Wu | 2023-05-23T21:50:06Z | cs.CL | With the recent appearance of LLMs in practical settings, having methods that
can effectively detect factual inconsistencies is crucial to reduce the
propagation of misinformation and improve trust in model outputs. When testing
on existing factual consistency benchmarks, we find that a few large language
models (LLMs) perform competitively on classification benchmarks for factual
inconsistency detection compared to traditional non-LLM methods. However, a
closer analysis reveals that most LLMs fail on more complex formulations of the
task and exposes issues with existing evaluation benchmarks, affecting
evaluation precision. To address this, we propose a new protocol for
inconsistency detection benchmark creation and implement it in a 10-domain
benchmark called SummEdits. This new benchmark is 20 times more cost-effective
per sample than previous benchmarks and highly reproducible, as we estimate
inter-annotator agreement at about 0.9. Most LLMs struggle on SummEdits, with
performance close to random chance. The best-performing model, GPT-4, is still
8\% below estimated human performance, highlighting the gaps in LLMs' ability
to reason about facts and detect inconsistencies when they occur. | cs.CL | LLMs as Factual Reasoners: Insights from Existing Benchmarks and Beyond |
2023-05-23T21:48:02Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14538v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14538v1 | Frédéric Odermatt, Béni Egressy, Roger Wattenhofer | 2023-05-23T21:48:02Z | cs.CL, cs.AI | This paper presents a plug-and-play approach for translation with terminology
constraints. Terminology constraints are an important aspect of many modern
translation pipelines. In both specialized domains and newly emerging domains
(such as the COVID-19 pandemic), accurate translation of technical terms is
crucial. Recent approaches often train models to copy terminologies from the
input into the output sentence by feeding the target terminology along with the
input. But this requires expensive training whenever the underlying language
model is changed or the system should specialize to a new domain. We propose
Cascade Beam Search, a plug-and-play terminology-forcing approach that requires
no training. Cascade Beam Search has two parts: 1) logit manipulation to
increase the probability of target terminologies and 2) a cascading beam setup
based on grid beam search, where beams are grouped by the number of
terminologies they contain. We evaluate the performance of our approach by
competing against the top submissions of the WMT21 terminology translation
task. Our plug-and-play approach performs on par with the winning submissions
without using a domain-specific language model and with no additional training. | cs.CL | Cascaded Beam Search: Plug-and-Play Terminology-Forcing For Neural Machine Translation |
2023-05-23T21:44:56Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14536v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14536v2 | Jakub Macina, Nico Daheim, Sankalan Pal Chowdhury, Tanmay Sinha, Manu Kapur, Iryna Gurevych, Mrinmaya Sachan | 2023-10-23T12:00:01Z | cs.CL | While automatic dialogue tutors hold great potential in making education
personalized and more accessible, research on such systems has been hampered by
a lack of sufficiently large and high-quality datasets. Collecting such
datasets remains challenging, as recording tutoring sessions raises privacy
concerns and crowdsourcing leads to insufficient data quality. To address this,
we propose a framework to generate such dialogues by pairing human teachers
with a Large Language Model (LLM) prompted to represent common student errors.
We describe how we use this framework to collect MathDial, a dataset of 3k
one-to-one teacher-student tutoring dialogues grounded in multi-step math
reasoning problems. While models like GPT-3 are good problem solvers, they fail
at tutoring because they generate factually incorrect feedback or are prone to
revealing solutions to students too early. To overcome this, we let teachers
provide learning opportunities to students by guiding them using various
scaffolding questions according to a taxonomy of teacher moves. We demonstrate
MathDial and its extensive annotations can be used to finetune models to be
more effective tutors (and not just solvers). We confirm this by automatic and
human evaluation, notably in an interactive setting that measures the trade-off
between student solving success and telling solutions. The dataset is released
publicly. | cs.CL | MathDial: A Dialogue Tutoring Dataset with Rich Pedagogical Properties Grounded in Math Reasoning Problems |
2023-05-23T21:37:26Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14534v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14534v2 | Muhammad Umar Salman, Asif Hanif, Shady Shehata, Preslav Nakov | 2024-03-15T18:26:48Z | cs.CL, cs.AI | Propaganda is a form of communication intended to influence the opinions and
the mindset of the public to promote a particular agenda. With the rise of
social media, propaganda has spread rapidly, leading to the need for automatic
propaganda detection systems. Most work on propaganda detection has focused on
high-resource languages, such as English, and little effort has been made to
detect propaganda for low-resource languages. Yet, it is common to find a mix
of multiple languages in social media communication, a phenomenon known as
code-switching. Code-switching combines different languages within the same
text, which poses a challenge for automatic systems. With this in mind, here we
propose the novel task of detecting propaganda techniques in code-switched
text. To support this task, we create a corpus of 1,030 texts code-switching
between English and Roman Urdu, annotated with 20 propaganda techniques, which
we make publicly available. We perform a number of experiments contrasting
different experimental setups, and we find that it is important to model the
multilinguality directly (rather than using translation) as well as to use the
right fine-tuning strategy. The code and the dataset are publicly available at
https://github.com/mbzuai-nlp/propaganda-codeswitched-text | cs.CL | Detecting Propaganda Techniques in Code-Switched Social Media Text |
2023-05-23T21:33:43Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14533v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14533v1 | Huda Khayrallah, Zuhaib Akhtar, Edward Cohen, João Sedoc | 2023-05-23T21:33:43Z | cs.CL | We release MMSMR, a Massively Multi-System MultiReference dataset to enable
future work on metrics and evaluation for dialog. Automatic metrics for
dialogue evaluation should be robust proxies for human judgments; however, the
verification of robustness is currently far from satisfactory. To quantify the
robustness correlation and understand what is necessary in a test set, we
create and release an 8-reference dialog dataset by extending single-reference
evaluation sets and introduce this new language learning conversation dataset.
We then train 1750 systems and evaluate them on our novel test set and the
DailyDialog dataset. We release the novel test set, and model hyper parameters,
inference outputs, and metric scores for each system on a variety of datasets. | cs.CL | How to Choose How to Choose Your Chatbot: A Massively Multi-System MultiReference Data Set for Dialog Metric Evaluation |
2023-05-23T20:49:45Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14521v3 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14521v3 | Yihao Xue, Ali Payani, Yu Yang, Baharan Mirzasoleiman | 2024-05-29T22:38:13Z | cs.LG, cs.CL, cs.CV | Pretrained machine learning models need to be adapted to distribution shifts
when deployed in new target environments. When obtaining labeled data from the
target distribution is expensive, few-shot adaptation with only a few examples
from the target distribution becomes essential. In this work, we propose
MixPro, a lightweight and highly data-efficient approach for few-shot
adaptation. MixPro first generates a relatively large dataset by mixing
(linearly combining) pre-trained embeddings of large source data with those of
the few target examples. This process preserves important features of both
source and target distributions, while mitigating the specific noise in the
small target data. Then, it trains a linear classifier on the mixed embeddings
to effectively adapts the model to the target distribution without overfitting
the small target data. Theoretically, we demonstrate the advantages of MixPro
over previous methods. Our experiments, conducted across various model
architectures on 8 datasets featuring different types of distribution shifts,
reveal that MixPro can outperform baselines by up to 7\%, with only 2-4 target
examples. | cs.LG | Few-shot Adaptation to Distribution Shifts By Mixing Source and Target Embeddings |
2023-05-23T20:26:03Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14507v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14507v1 | Shashank Sonkar, Richard G. Baraniuk | 2023-05-23T20:26:03Z | cs.CL | We explore whether Large Language Models (LLMs) are capable of logical
reasoning with distorted facts, which we call Deduction under Perturbed
Evidence (DUPE). DUPE presents a unique challenge to LLMs since they typically
rely on their parameters, which encode mostly accurate information, to reason
and make inferences. However, in DUPE, LLMs must reason over manipulated or
falsified evidence present in their prompts, which can result in false
conclusions that are valid only under the manipulated evidence. Our goal with
DUPE is to determine whether LLMs can arrive at these false conclusions and
identify whether the dominant factor influencing the deduction process is the
encoded data in the parameters or the manipulated evidence in the prompts. To
evaluate the DUPE capabilities of LLMs, we create a DUPEd version of the
StrategyQA dataset, where facts are manipulated to reverse the answer to the
question. Our findings show that even the most advanced GPT models struggle to
reason on manipulated facts - showcasing poor DUPE skills - with accuracy
dropping by 45% compared to the original dataset. We also investigate prompt
settings inspired from student simulation models, which mitigate the accuracy
drop to some extent. Our findings have practical implications for understanding
the performance of LLMs in real-world applications such as student simulation
models that involve reasoning over inaccurate information. | cs.CL | Deduction under Perturbed Evidence: Probing Student Simulation Capabilities of Large Language Models |
2023-05-23T20:15:56Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14502v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14502v2 | Alexander Scarlatos, Andrew Lan | 2024-04-16T17:25:25Z | cs.CL, cs.AI, cs.LG | Recent developments in large pre-trained language models have enabled
unprecedented performance on a variety of downstream tasks. Achieving best
performance with these models often leverages in-context learning, where a
model performs a (possibly new) task given one or more examples. However,
recent work has shown that the choice of examples can have a large impact on
task performance and that finding an optimal set of examples is non-trivial.
While there are many existing methods for selecting in-context examples, they
generally score examples independently, ignoring the dependency between them
and the order in which they are provided to the model. In this work, we propose
Retrieval for In-Context Learning (RetICL), a learnable method for modeling and
optimally selecting examples sequentially for in-context learning. We frame the
problem of sequential example selection as a Markov decision process and train
an example retriever using reinforcement learning. We evaluate RetICL on math
word problem solving and scientific question answering tasks and show that it
consistently outperforms or matches heuristic and learnable baselines. We also
use case studies to show that RetICL implicitly learns representations of
problem solving strategies. | cs.CL | RetICL: Sequential Retrieval of In-Context Examples with Reinforcement Learning |
2023-05-23T20:09:52Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14499v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14499v2 | Livio Baldini Soares, Daniel Gillick, Jeremy R. Cole, Tom Kwiatkowski | 2023-10-23T14:46:34Z | cs.CL, cs.IR | Neural document rerankers are extremely effective in terms of accuracy.
However, the best models require dedicated hardware for serving, which is
costly and often not feasible. To avoid this serving-time requirement, we
present a method of capturing up to 86% of the gains of a Transformer
cross-attention model with a lexicalized scoring function that only requires
10-6% of the Transformer's FLOPs per document and can be served using commodity
CPUs. When combined with a BM25 retriever, this approach matches the quality of
a state-of-the art dual encoder retriever, that still requires an accelerator
for query encoding. We introduce NAIL (Non-Autoregressive Indexing with
Language models) as a model architecture that is compatible with recent
encoder-decoder and decoder-only large language models, such as T5, GPT-3 and
PaLM. This model architecture can leverage existing pre-trained checkpoints and
can be fine-tuned for efficiently constructing document representations that do
not require neural processing of queries. | cs.CL | NAIL: Lexical Retrieval Indices with Efficient Non-Autoregressive Decoders |
2023-05-23T19:58:30Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14497v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14497v2 | Zhiheng Xi, Senjie Jin, Yuhao Zhou, Rui Zheng, Songyang Gao, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang, Xuanjing Huang | 2024-04-18T07:27:00Z | cs.CL, cs.AI | To enhance the multi-step reasoning capabilities of large language models,
researchers have extensively explored prompting methods, notably the
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) method which explicitly elicits human-like rationales.
However, they have inadvertently overlooked the potential of enhancing model
reasoning performance by formulating higher-quality problems. In this work, we
start from the problem side and propose Self-Polish (SP), a novel method that
facilitates the model's reasoning by guiding it to progressively refine the
given problems to be more comprehensible and solvable. We also explore several
automatic prompting varients and propose the Self-Polish prompt bank for the
community. SP is orthogonal to all other prompting methods of answer/reasoning
side like CoT, allowing for seamless integration with state-of-the-art
techniques for further improvement. Thorough experiments show that the proposed
method attains notable and consistent effectiveness on five reasoning
benchmarks across different models. Furthermore, our method also showcases
impressive performance on robustness evaluation. Codes and prompts are
available at https://github.com/WooooDyy/Self-Polish. | cs.CL | Self-Polish: Enhance Reasoning in Large Language Models via Problem Refinement |
2023-05-23T19:45:45Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14493v4 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14493v4 | Junyu Mao, Stuart E. Middleton, Mahesan Niranjan | 2024-06-28T12:04:53Z | cs.CL | Prompt-based models have gathered a lot of attention from researchers due to
their remarkable advancements in the fields of zero-shot and few-shot learning.
Developing an effective prompt template plays a critical role. However, prior
studies have mainly focused on prompt vocabulary searching or embedding
initialization within a predefined template with the prompt position fixed. In
this empirical study, we conduct the most comprehensive analysis to date of
prompt position for diverse Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. Our
findings quantify the substantial impact prompt position has on model
performance. We observe that the prompt positions used in prior studies are
often sub-optimal, and this observation is consistent even in widely used
instruction-tuned models. These findings suggest prompt position optimisation
as a valuable research direction to augment prompt engineering methodologies
and prompt position-aware instruction tuning as a potential way to build more
robust models in the future. | cs.CL | Do prompt positions really matter? |
2023-05-23T19:43:47Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14492v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14492v2 | Sky CH-Wang, Arkadiy Saakyan, Oliver Li, Zhou Yu, Smaranda Muresan | 2023-10-23T00:53:01Z | cs.CL | Designing systems that can reason across cultures requires that they are
grounded in the norms of the contexts in which they operate. However, current
research on developing computational models of social norms has primarily
focused on American society. Here, we propose a novel approach to discover and
compare descriptive social norms across Chinese and American cultures. We
demonstrate our approach by leveraging discussions on a Chinese Q&A platform
(Zhihu) and the existing SocialChemistry dataset as proxies for contrasting
cultural axes, align social situations cross-culturally, and extract social
norms from texts using in-context learning. Embedding Chain-of-Thought
prompting in a human-AI collaborative framework, we build a high-quality
dataset of 3,069 social norms aligned with social situations across Chinese and
American cultures alongside corresponding free-text explanations. To test the
ability of models to reason about social norms across cultures, we introduce
the task of explainable social norm entailment, showing that existing models
under 3B parameters have significant room for improvement in both automatic and
human evaluation. Further analysis of cross-cultural norm differences based on
our dataset shows empirical alignment with the social orientations framework,
revealing several situational and descriptive nuances in norms across these
cultures. | cs.CL | Sociocultural Norm Similarities and Differences via Situational Alignment and Explainable Textual Entailment |
2023-05-23T19:38:28Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14489v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14489v2 | Nghia T. Le, Alan Ritter | 2023-11-15T04:51:27Z | cs.CL | Recent work on extending coreference resolution across domains and languages
relies on annotated data in both the target domain and language. At the same
time, pre-trained large language models (LMs) have been reported to exhibit
strong zero- and few-shot learning abilities across a wide range of NLP tasks.
However, prior work mostly studied this ability using artificial sentence-level
datasets such as the Winograd Schema Challenge. In this paper, we assess the
feasibility of prompt-based coreference resolution by evaluating
instruction-tuned language models on difficult, linguistically-complex
coreference benchmarks (e.g., CoNLL-2012). We show that prompting for
coreference can outperform current unsupervised coreference systems, although
this approach appears to be reliant on high-quality mention detectors. Further
investigations reveal that instruction-tuned LMs generalize surprisingly well
across domains, languages, and time periods; yet continued fine-tuning of
neural models should still be preferred if small amounts of annotated examples
are available. | cs.CL | Are Large Language Models Robust Coreference Resolvers? |
2023-05-23T19:25:52Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14483v1 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14483v1 | Jing-Cheng Pang, Pengyuan Wang, Kaiyuan Li, Xiong-Hui Chen, Jiacheng Xu, Zongzhang Zhang, Yang Yu | 2023-05-23T19:25:52Z | cs.CL, cs.LG | Large Language Models (LLMs) have exhibited remarkable performance across
various natural language processing (NLP) tasks. However, fine-tuning these
models often necessitates substantial supervision, which can be expensive and
time-consuming to obtain. This paper introduces a novel unsupervised method
called LanguageModel Self-Improvement by Reinforcement Learning Contemplation
(SIRLC) that improves LLMs without reliance on external labels. Our approach is
grounded in the observation that it is simpler for language models to assess
text quality than to generate text. Building on this insight, SIRLC assigns
LLMs dual roles as both student and teacher. As a student, the LLM generates
answers to unlabeled questions, while as a teacher, it evaluates the generated
text and assigns scores accordingly. The model parameters are updated using
reinforcement learning to maximize the evaluation score. We demonstrate that
SIRLC can be applied to various NLP tasks, such as reasoning problems, text
generation, and machine translation. Our experiments show that SIRLC
effectively improves LLM performance without external supervision, resulting in
a 5.6% increase in answering accuracy for reasoning tasks and a rise in
BERTScore from 0.82 to 0.86 for translation tasks. Furthermore, SIRLC can be
applied to models of different sizes, showcasing its broad applicability. | cs.CL | Language Model Self-improvement by Reinforcement Learning Contemplation |
2023-05-23T19:24:42Z | http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14482v2 | http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14482v2 | Jindřich Libovický | 2023-10-25T09:13:34Z | cs.CL | We study how multilingual sentence representations capture European countries
and occupations and how this differs across European languages. We prompt the
models with templated sentences that we machine-translate into 12 European
languages and analyze the most prominent dimensions in the embeddings.Our
analysis reveals that the most prominent feature in the embedding is the
geopolitical distinction between Eastern and Western Europe and the country's
economic strength in terms of GDP. When prompted specifically for job prestige,
the embedding space clearly distinguishes high and low-prestige jobs. The
occupational dimension is uncorrelated with the most dominant country
dimensions in three out of four studied models. The exception is a small
distilled model that exhibits a connection between occupational prestige and
country of origin, which is a potential source of nationality-based
discrimination. Our findings are consistent across languages. | cs.CL | Is a Prestigious Job the same as a Prestigious Country? A Case Study on Multilingual Sentence Embeddings and European Countries |
Subsets and Splits
No saved queries yet
Save your SQL queries to embed, download, and access them later. Queries will appear here once saved.