rev_id
int64 37.7k
700M
| comment
stringlengths 5
10k
| year
int64 2k
2.02k
| logged_in
bool 2
classes | ns
stringclasses 2
values | sample
stringclasses 2
values | split
stringclasses 3
values | attack
bool 2
classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
693,657,145 | ` :::Nor have I made a legal threat. First, I am not among those three people who participated in that visit to the BLM protest. I have never known any of these people. I would not be the offended party, in any case. I've never even lived in Minnesota, or been there in over 30 years or so. (I made an airplane connection through Minneapolis in about 1985, as I vaguely recall.) I am not saying there WILL be any sort of legal proceeding; I am merely saying that to cite this claim (``heard the N-word``) risks running afoul of being libel. I think WP rules allow us to express concern that the cite of a vague assertion that somebody ``heard the N-word`` is problematic from a WP:BLP standpoint. If multiple BLM protestors claim that they heard one of the (white) visitors say the N-word, and it was cited from some reliable source, that would probably change my opinion. Can you see why this would be a different situation? ` | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | test | false |
693,673,543 | : There was a consensus to delete, so I can't REFUND per se, I can draftify it if you like, though. (or if I'm missing new evidence that should be obvious, feel free to apply clue!) Cheers, | 2,015 | true | user | random | train | false |
693,681,946 | ::: Even though the infobox contains all of that info except players… - | 2,015 | true | article | random | train | false |
693,683,802 | `(Not to mention the article on George W. Bush, who is widely condemned and reviled in almost the entire world for illegal wars of aggression, torture and murder of much more than 3,000 civilians, and whose actions are often described by many highly credible sources as war crimes; yet his article does not label him ``controversial`` in the lead.) ` | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | train | false |
693,687,038 | == Article title? == I get Wikipedia's willingness to be politically correct, but this person was born a man. What is the rationale for using the girl name he gave himself, as opposed to using the birthname God gifted him? | 2,015 | false | article | blocked | train | false |
693,689,410 | ::Thank you! No. 2 is one of the former names of Al-Andalus. As for No. 1 I guess in reality it only has an English name and a Bengali name (I am contacting Bengali editors so they can get that name for me) | 2,015 | true | user | random | train | false |
693,697,640 | ==Discussion at Talk:Darth Vader#Edit war== You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Darth Vader#Edit war. Thanks. - ) | 2,015 | true | user | random | train | false |
693,714,454 | I will alxays return: delete my 200 articles StupydBitch | 2,015 | false | user | blocked | train | false |
693,720,008 | In that case, the article should be renamed. It's misleading. | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | train | false |
693,726,050 | : The original user Barfbag666 was not blocked for vandalism it was the username similar to HAILXSATANX666. Barfbag666 could have changed their username to HAILXSATANX666 and continued writing. Had Barfbag666 changed their name, it would be agreeing and bowing to the viewpoint of the blocking administrators which was obviously biased. That's the point, it's not NPOV. So logically even if they were the same user it's irrelevant. | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | train | false |
693,726,313 | a claim of a disruptive username | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | train | false |
693,727,746 | and blocking any of these is just blocking usernames that Satanists would likely enjoy to write under thus further driving the NPOV and bias. | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | train | false |
693,728,066 | and perpetuating beliefs of those that just don't want to see said religious words; harassment | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | train | false |
693,728,608 | :: Further once again, there's productive edits such as Left Hand Path workgroup being reverted gagging said voice and ability to support the ANI. | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | test | false |
693,740,753 | ::::::: Thanks for doing that. I have thoughts on the subject but I said I was done for the time and will stick with that. I think there are ways that these things can be better handled in the articles such as a policy of erring on the side of inclusion when even a few reliable, conflicting sources can be found (that doesn't mean Weight needs to be equal). Anyway, I support your efforts. | 2,015 | true | user | random | train | false |
693,773,771 | ` == Invasion of Gujrat article content and reference == I got it mostly from the book ``Maharana Sanga The Hindupat, the Last Great Leader of the Rajput Race by Bilas Sarda`` I did give references if they are not put properly i would ask for your help and would be grateful as im trying to promote these wars that were won by Rana Sanga. The book can be found on forgotten books. ` | 2,015 | true | user | random | dev | false |
693,779,026 | == Pidgin Hawaiian == Can you explain/justify your Nov 25 change to Pidgin Hawaiian? It seems as if you removed a useful reference. If I don't hear from you in a few days I will revert your change. Thanks, | 2,015 | true | user | random | dev | false |
693,789,025 | :::And you don't see Apple County remaining vigilant. ~~ | 2,015 | true | article | random | test | false |
693,797,909 | Your FFU request Hello, and thank you for your request at Files for Upload! The file has been uploaded. You can find it at File:Sydney Missionary and Bible College logo.jpg. See Wikipedia:Images#Using images to learn image syntax, or Wikipedia:Creation and usage of media files for other types of files. Regards, | | | 2,015 | true | user | random | dev | false |
693,808,619 | and 100% in all cases | 2,015 | true | article | random | dev | false |
693,809,172 | Hmmm... I notice on looking at this page's history, that you fucking idiot Wikifools keep editing out anything that might make me look reasonable. You want to make me look bad, so you edit out actual apologies and shit. You merely prove my point. Jackboot Nazi Idiots are still Idiots, no matter how much they try to hide their stupidity. Kindly take flight, and aim your copulatory efforts at a rotating pastry, assholes. In other words, fuck you, and the horse you rode in on. | 2,015 | false | user | blocked | train | true |
693,810,822 | `Edited to Add: Quoting your previous post: ``While you probably didn't intend any offense`` And responding: Fuck, yeah, I intended offense. Your officious assholish attitude is highly offensive to me. I REALLY INTENDED TO OFFEND YOU, asswipe. If I didn't succeed in pissing you off and offending you then I failed. Bite me, moron. ` | 2,015 | false | user | blocked | train | true |
693,825,328 | ` == Appreciate the help on MST3K , but... == First, I do thank you for all the small copyediting you are doing on my major revisions to the MST3K. However, one thing that keeps coming up: per our MOS:LQ, we never put punctuation inside quotes, unless the quote itself is a sentence. Some of your edits there have been specifically to that style. ` | 2,015 | true | user | random | train | false |
693,832,101 | i somewhat agree with you but then again everyone has something to say and the things that have bee written have changed because we have found out what really happened or what he really did or said. People just want to inform others about their recently discoveries! | 2,015 | false | article | random | dev | false |
693,877,917 | == Block ?== How can you block an editor like me? with 17.000 edits in 6 months !! No one on Wikipedia has so many edits in this short period ! | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | train | false |
693,878,102 | Check also what Eldumpo did to so many articles, he never add a word, just delete !! Like this Wikipedia will run out of aticles ! | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | test | false |
693,878,273 | It is not possible, you have to implement a rule for this, at list a period of warning, evert editor to know that he has to improve his work, not to come back on Wikipedia and see all your worked and other people ruined because of an editor like Eldumpo !! | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | dev | false |
693,878,885 | OK, I understand about me, what are you going to say to Eldumpo ? He provoked me, he deleted many many things on Wikipedia, check his history, he just deletes, no improving, it is this normal behaviour ? | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | train | false |
693,879,207 | == SEC division names == Hey, Dale. I just reverted an edit of yours where you changed the SEC division names. The full names of the two divisions are Eastern Division and Western Division, and have been so named since 1992 (see, e.g., ). Casually, however, they are often referred to as the SEC East and SEC West shorthand even in the SEC's own materials. Any time we are providing a formal list of SEC member names, we probably should use the full names of the divisions. Cheers. | 2,015 | true | user | random | train | false |
693,886,168 | ::::The Nissan rumors are nonsense, your source is bunk and not trustworthy. Call me when BBC or Autosport reports that. I am talking about the actual HEAD OF THE ORGANIZATION saying what they will do. And answer me this: do you even watch F1? If you did, you'd probably know that the Renault deal was confirmed TWO DAYS AGO...this is why the two of you need to be ignored here. You have obviously no clue what you're talking about and you've made that clear many times. The fact that you have any influence on the content of this page is a joke, frankly. | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | train | false |
693,886,903 | Why do you restore things with references? Why no ones does something with QED237 ? WIKIPEDIA IS CORRUPT ! | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | dev | true |
693,887,008 | It is a shame what people are here, I am disgusting of you. | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | train | true |
693,887,135 | Tunisian Super Cup - vandalism attacked by reverted after I add references ! why no ones does something ? | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | train | false |
693,887,695 | @. You better unblock me because there is now lots of vandalism attacks happening, and you do nothing ! How you can block me? the google translate is not good ! Let me translate it to you. UNBLOCK ME | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | train | false |
693,888,608 | ::::::I don't appreciate YOUR conduct. You are nowhere near well-informed enough to have any input into this discussion. Go away, learn more about F1, read more F1 news (how in the world did you not know the Renault deal was done?), then maybe come back and contribute. As of right now, your contributions are zero. And for someone who is trying very hard to make this the best article it can be, you are immensely frustrating and testing my patience. Would you edit a quantum physics article without any knowledge of physics? If not...why are you here? | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | train | false |
693,890,664 | How you can vote him to be an administrator ? WIKIPEDIA = CORUPTION ! | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | train | false |
693,890,778 | ::::::::I will not stand for your incompetence. Do better. And it's childish that you feel the need to tattle and cry just because you can't make a valid point and support it. And this is yet another reason why wiki is garbage, why trying to edit here is a waste of time, and specifically why the F1 wikiproject is awful. | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | dev | true |
693,892,807 | == December 2015 == Please leave me alone. I had to due my duty in ensuring that you gain no further power on this site but otherwise I want no interaction with you. | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | test | false |
693,892,979 | ::::::::::You are both liars and you both do nothing but make this page worse. I will not leave and concede to your trolling. | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | train | true |
693,908,358 | ` ==Sockpuppet investigation== ` | 2,015 | true | user | random | train | false |
693,920,277 | ` :Thanks, I just told him he shouldn't be abusing editors like that. It's not right. { Contribs } ` | 2,015 | true | user | random | test | false |
693,921,202 | ` ::::::::Where I live, MSF's representative some years ago was known to aggressively heckle and harrass people if they didn't give his organization money (he was attempting to collect money in a public place). So ``renowned`` is not a description that springs to mind when you mention MSF. The fact is that there are hundreds of thousands if not millions of purported charities who collect money from people and who claim to be the saviours of the world. There is no obligation to support a particular charity, and Gilbert's rationale for not supporting MSF is perfectly reasonable and within his rights. I find it very odd indeed that you try to use the fact that he doesn't support one particular charity (because it doesn't take a stand against occupation and war crimes) as a personal attack against him. ` | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | test | false |
693,921,420 | Your rant above seems to be mainly about the fact that you don't like Gilbert, and seems to have little to do with improvement of this article. | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | test | false |
693,921,489 | ::::::::::::I never said the German GP 100% would happen. All I said is that IF it did happen it would be in Germany and thus a German flag was required. You were wrong then and you're still wrong now. As I said before, everything bad about this article is your doing. You've contributed nothing positive and do nothing but delay progress. | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | train | false |
693,921,790 | the private organization | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | dev | false |
693,926,780 | == White Latin American == You think that I'm stupid, right ?. I already use the discucion of the page White Latin American, and to this day there is still no answers. I know that you and other users have an alliance with the user Bleckter against me, and I will discover, and when I do I will bring to light. I'm watching all. | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | train | true |
693,944,636 | per Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2015 December 1 | 2,015 | true | article | random | dev | false |
693,950,134 | ` *I have removed the POV template; please do not deface FAs with tags - at least three editors disagree with your changes. Thanks. - ` | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | test | false |
693,952,369 | ==Please stop vandalizing my good faith edits== Hi sir, I am just trying to make Wikipedia better. Please don't touch my edits without prior authorization on my part. | 2,015 | false | user | blocked | test | false |
693,952,488 | ` :::You inserted the tag after you were reverted twice and are therefore using the tag to deface an article simply because you are not gaining traction in a content dispute. Plese do not re-instate it again - as an Admin you should know better. - ` | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | test | false |
693,953,382 | ` :::::I have to admit something now. I am gay and I like to suck big cocks. To be, big cock appropriation is culturally appropriate. Is there anyone interested in my offer? Please {{re}} ` | 2,015 | false | article | blocked | test | true |
693,954,220 | *Reply: Mr. Blecker, with all the respect that you deserve, this situation you do not care, and I don't use google translator, I only use that it if I did not know a word in English, that phrase I put it as mockery of Marrovi because he use the google translator. And these attacks are from months ago, I already apologize personally to the user Marrovi. | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | dev | false |
693,962,949 | *I come to label that the user Blecker after to accusing me and put his dirty hands on data of Argentina and Costa Rica, he did not follow editing, this could signify a WP: SPA. | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | train | false |
693,981,670 | :Thanks dude! As soon as I'm unblocked, I'll imitate your signature. ;-) | 2,015 | false | user | blocked | train | false |
693,989,433 | ` :::::: The onus is on you to show that ``the guidelines`` require removal of that study. I don't have to make your arguments for you. ` | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | train | false |
694,015,677 | not important. 15:15 | 2,015 | true | user | random | dev | false |
694,022,974 | ` == Of utmost importance and urgency == This page has been falsely protected in order to maintain a terrible error that could kill people. The truth need to be said. Wikipedia shall not bow to Shariah bigotry. The following verse from the Quran needs to be added to the top of this page: Quran (8:12) - ``I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them`` Since evil persists, some evil person has removed the truth from being shared. Creating a bias is against the foundational raison d'être of Wikipedia.` | 2,015 | false | article | blocked | test | false |
694,023,363 | ` Your edit on the page on Islamopobia is evil. Your comments could result in deaths of innocent lives. The truth needs to be shared. Quran (8:12) - ``I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them`` Do not censor Wikipedia. Do not silence the truth. ` | 2,015 | false | user | blocked | train | false |
694,024,085 | ::You asked for evidence and I gave you evidence. Two users disagreed with two other users. The latter drove away the former and now get to decide the content of the page alone, without opposition. It is INSANE that you will do nothing about this. | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | dev | false |
694,024,210 | ::: Be proactive. You have the ability now to step in and set the tone. Otherwise, this argument will drag on for months, and Tvx1 and Zwerg Nase will get even better at trolling. | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | test | false |
694,024,325 | ` == Urgent sabotage of page! == Significant parts of this page were deleted. These deletions could result in deaths of innocent lives. The truth needs to be shared. Quran (8:12) - ``I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them`` Do not censor Wikipedia. Do not silence the truth. Do not be in denial!` | 2,015 | false | article | blocked | train | false |
694,026,254 | :::::Go to the F1 2016 page. They almost immediately reverted it to their style once I was blocked. This is not a baseless accusation, it is an objective fact. | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | train | false |
694,027,711 | ` :::::::I'm not calling them liars because they disagree with me. I'm calling them liars because they're LYING. The page, in it's current (false) state includes a note saying, ``Renault announced the purchase of Lotus F1 Team, but have yet to announce changes to the team's identity.`` But that's objectively not true! The head of the team literally said that the current name, Lotus, will disappear (http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/2015/11/lotus-boss-admits-name-will-disappear-from-f1-when-renault-deal-goes-through/). So TBA, at the very least, is the correcting naming choice. Leaving the word ``Lotus`` as the team name is a literal, provable, and objective LIE. ` | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | train | false |
694,042,106 | ` == Incorrect statement re the history of succession policy == The article states ``The President of the Quorum of the Twelve becomes the highest-ranking official in the church, and has always become the next church president`` (emphasis added). This was not true prior to 1900 when the rule was changed. In that year, President Lorenzo Snow changed the rule to prevent John Young from succeeding him. Young had never been a member of the Quorum of the Twelve so adding the Quorum requirement prevented Young's assuming the office. See Wikipedia on Snow.` | 2,015 | false | article | random | dev | false |
694,043,118 | == quick thing mate == Give me a couple of reasons NOT to kill you plz. btw this is a shared IP adress on a school computer so don't even bother responding, | 2,015 | false | user | blocked | train | true |
694,052,944 | ==RFC== Should the sentence with one reference about AllieX being Soprano or not be included or not included zt this time. The earlier consensus was to exclude the referring to the artist as soprano. | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | train | false |
694,059,203 | ` == If you continue to vandalize the ``defensive gun use`` page, you will be blocked from Wikipedia == Warning! Please use your head. There are 1.2 million incidents of violent crime in the US yearly. Please do not insert made up facts without reference into articles, claiming ``33 million defensive gun uses.`` The number of legitimate defensive gun uses in the U.S cannot exceed the total number of crimes, friend.` | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | dev | false |
694,064,820 | How about you answer the question? Where in the link that you cited did you pull the 33 million figure from? You are making up statistics, and if you continue to restore edits with fraudulent statistics I will see to it that you are blocked, friend. | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | test | true |
694,065,670 | 1. You are lying. Post the sentence where it says 33 million if you are not lying. 2. You are violating your topic ban by being here, and if you do not leave, I will report your malfeasance and have you permanently banned. 3. The Kleck study is 20 years old and based on discredited methodology. It honestly should not even be in the article. You are embarrassing yourself by fawning over it. | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | test | false |
694,066,606 | ` 1. P.121 does not contain any mention of ``33 million``. You should be banned from Wilipedia for making up numbers and putting them in articles. 2. You were already blocked for posting in gun control articles. You are violating that topic block. Get out, and please do not place false statistics in articles in the future.` | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | train | false |
694,067,156 | ` You are making up that figure. It does not occur in the article you cite too. And think how illogical you sound. ``33 million.`` There cannot be more than defensive gun uses than total crimes, as a matter of logic. And this would mean that 99.99 percent of DGUs are unreported. Nowhere in that article does the number 33 million occur. You are lying through your teeth.` | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | train | false |
694,068,806 | m Whatever. You're an stupid redneck hillbilly who is too uneducated to understand the most basic axioms of logic (defensive gun use cannot occur more than 100 percent of the time.) you're also a liar, since it doesn't say 33 million. The article says 1 million. Enjoy your fraudulent encyclopedia, you intellectual fraud. i hope you enjoy mastrbating to your gun collection at night and your middle school education which thinks it's possible for there to have been 33 million gun uses. It's not even logically possible for there to have been a million, but you have zero intellectual honesty or integrity and you might be the single dumbest two individuals I have ever met. Wikipedia is truly the last refuge for idiots who failed out of their formal education and cannot understand the most basic elements of logical argument. And you had no business removing all the other well sourced content I added showing that there WERE ONLy 1600 ACTUAL CASES REPORTED. God, how does someone as stupid as you manage to live? | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | train | true |
694,068,959 | ` *After several edit conflicts - Liz, you are truly pathetic. Perhaps one day you might learn how to produce content although it is doubtful. You are simply a POV social network wannabe. I've told you to stay away from me and stop your pathetic blatant attacks. Grow up. - Dennis, I'm sorry this is playing out on your talk page but I've had enough of these POV pushers ...` | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | train | false |
694,070,070 | == Gaijin42 inserted fake statistics into the Defensive Gun Use article and Removed the accurately cited statistics I added == His references do not say what he says they say. He is unable to produce a quoted citation showing the 33 million figure. He is making it up. If you want to have an encyclopedia with made up facts, where someone can add a figure of 33 million that they invented and which isn't in the article, please go ahead. But I don't think that's an encyclopedia anymore. As for me, I added a cited , with inline citations reference showing that there are only 1600 verified DGUs yearly. Not only that, Gaijins claim is not logically possible. Any elementary logic shows that what he is claiming is impossible. Think about what you are doing in allowing a vandal like Gaijin to insert fake statistics into articles to suit a political agenda when he has already been topic banned from this area and was just reinstated. He is indeed committing fraud by inserting statistics that aren't in the reference. Also, his reference is 20 years old and is intellectually discredited years ago. You might as well replace the Period Table page with Phlogiston theory. | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | train | false |
694,070,866 | Also, he has been blocked from editing in that area previously likely because he inserts fake statistics into articles. 33 million, or even 1'million, are not logically possible figures. They removed the ACTUALLY VERIFIED FIGURE OF 1600 which I posted with refs and inline citation to suit their own misguided beliefs. You should not allow erroneous information to be posted in an encyclopedia. The reference nowhere says 33 million, and even the 1 million figure is ludicrous. | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | dev | false |
694,071,359 | Don't you care that a user is getting away with making up statistics and adding them to articles? Isn't that vandalism? There is no citation that says 33 million and he has managed to get it back in there by blocking me. Do you care that your encyclopedia contains intentional falsehoods or not? | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | dev | false |
694,071,808 | How about the quotation of the sentence in the article that says 33 million. You send the reference but the reference doesn't say what you say it does. Thus, you are a liar (and a hillbilly.) | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | test | false |
694,071,913 | The actual, verified figure is 1584 in 2014. You are only off by, oh, say 2 million times, friend. | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | dev | false |
694,082,871 | ` *You are an insidious POV ``editor`` - I use quotation marks as personally I consider you very far from a competent content editor. Get a live, learn some integrity and as far as I'm concerned move on. You are not worth the dirt on my shoes ... take a hike ... do I need to make my thoughts about you any clearer? - ` | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | train | false |
694,088,207 | ` :You were edit warring and then pointedly added templates - definitely behaviour unbecoming of an Administrator ... but I'm willing to be swayed by any proof you have that you are able to provide that you understand exactly what constitutes good content. How many GAs or FAs have you been a significant contributor to, for instance? - ` | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | train | false |
694,091,694 | ` ******After numerous edit conflicts - yes, I am FEMALE and have never made any secret of it. Dave or whatever your name is, if you want to take me to AN/I, just carry on - it will be a new experience for me. I have always done my best but evidently ``editors`` like yourself and the exalted Liz feel that is not good enough so on you go. I do not give a shit. - ` | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | train | false |
694,095,112 | ` *Again after numerous edit conflicts - perhaps some people should look at the spurious attacks Liz made against me on my talk page before claiming I have poked too much? Again, I really do not give a shit - she is incapable of producing any true content and is purely a POV social net worker, so do as you please. I always thought Wikipedia provided a service to readers by providing well researched articles but evidently that is not the case nowadays - we all live and learn, perhaps one day I may be able to follow the example of such exalted ``editors/admins`` as Liz - to be honest, it is not an ideal I think worth living up to but, of course, your opinion may differ. - ` | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | train | false |
694,096,223 | ` :Oh, really? No comment/blocks for me being harassed? - ` | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | test | false |
694,097,215 | ` *Strongly Oppose The effect, and presumably the intent of this merger is to cover up the incident involving the assault by the BLM protestors on the visitors. When it appeared that the victims were black, and the perpetrators were white, nobody had a problem with separate articles. Now that the existence of at least two videos are known, showing that the victims were white, and the perpetrators were black, everybody in the list above wants to cover up the story. There was very much insufficient notice given, and people weren't given enough time to comment and oppose. The ``notice`` given was simply that somebody had made a proposal: People were not directed to respond in any particular location. This merger is clearly a sham. There should have been at least 3 months notice given. There is no argument for a rapid merger. ` | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | train | false |
694,098,552 | == How tiny is your penis??? == You already had me blocked like a piece of shit might, without regard for the REASON for the conflict. But you couldn't stop at the given template, could you? No. You had to add your own extra bit of personal ad hominem needling, to make yourself feel like a real big man. Good for you, pal. I wouldn't dream of eve making another contribution (after having done so THOUSANDS OF TIMES) to WP ever again, and petty tyrants like yourself are the reason. Feel free to have me blocked again, goof. You're rubbish, and so is Wikipedia. | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | train | true |
694,098,729 | ` :::Get a life - you only see what you want to see - par for the course, I don't give a shit, so whatever. 49 hours for the first time I've ever been blocked/warned ... ... Wikipedia's loss, not mine. - ` | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | train | false |
694,102,709 | ` ::::::So you can't even manage to get the number of hours right? 48 or 49? The efficiency of Wikipedia admins. I don't need to supply diffs - the abuse is there for all to see. As I already stated, it's Wikipedia's loss not mine. Have a nice day. - ` | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | dev | false |
694,106,903 | ` *AusLondonder made accusations against me in an AfD that no admin chose to do anything about; Liz made spurious accusations against me on my talk page page - again everyone turned a blind eye. No surprise ... you only see what you want to see. - ` | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | dev | false |
694,107,131 | :::At least 95% of the stories on this incident were both the same and false: The claim that the three whites had spontaneously shot the BLM protestors. The truth was diametrically the opposite. Given this falsification of the events, how does that actually support concealing those events by merging the articles, after little more than 2 weeks? | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | dev | false |
694,107,697 | ` == Caution on Talk Page of 2015 Minneapolis Shooting article. == I didn't post this, but it is an important caution from the article ``2015 Minneapolis Shooting`` article that should be cited. These videos should be cited. ``Be very careful making any strong statements about the motivations or character of any of the people involved in this shooting. Information that has not been widely disseminated may change the media narrative very soon: Video from shooters' perspective: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hc3c6cK9p_w First part of this video is before the shooting, second part after: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XVgpfvwNEwg 38.75.57.92 (talk) `` ` | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | dev | false |
694,123,279 | ` == Homosexuality == Hi everyone, I would like to come out and admit my homosexuality. Cheers! ` | 2,015 | false | user | blocked | train | true |
694,167,703 | ` Yes Ritchie we are here to write an encyclopedia and not yell at each other. That is why when a user makes personal attacks against other users we block them, so that we can write an encyclopedia and not yell at each other. When a user is blocked for personal attacks and insisting they have done nothing wrong then unblocking them validates the idea that they did nothing wrong. If the civility policy is not enforced then those who like yelling will drive off those who prefer to work collaboratively. I don't think people are angry, just annoyed. ` | 2,015 | true | user | random | test | false |
694,182,956 | ` == Harizotoh9: removal of well-sourced material (NY Times) == : I saw you made this edit removing the discussion of the New York Times front-page editorial. In your edit summary, you claimed: ``wont' be notable in a short time.`` That is just flat wrong, and it's an unexplained ipse dixit to boot. The last time a front-page editorial ran on the cover the Times was 95 years ago. (Specifically, June 13, 1920). It is obviously historically significant when the country's leading paper does something so rare. And this fact was recognized globally; the decision to publish on the front page generated extensive attention, by, to name just a few of literally hundreds: BBC News, the Washington Post, the NYT itself, The Daily Beast (interview with NYT executive editor Dean Baquet on the decision), and NPR, Reuters, The Independent, and on and on. It has been the subject of articles published by The Poynter Institute and the Cato Institute. Given all this, there is no justification for not covering it, as I think the vast majority of editors here would agree... ` | 2,015 | true | article | random | test | false |
694,184,742 | ::::::::: Go ahead. Let's talk about your obsession with reverting content because it displeases your feelings. And I'm still reverting. | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | train | false |
694,184,886 | :::::::: Nothing has been shown by that person. She only vaguely mentioned the guidelines - she failed to point where they show the studies are problematic. And so have you. | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | train | false |
694,185,378 | ::::::: You have been maniacally hostile this entire fucking time. In your very first contribution to this conversation, you accused me of pushing biased activist editing right away, failing to assume good faith, and failing also to consider my arguments otherwise. You set the tone in this conversation, and I'm responding in kind. Consider not bringing the fire next time if you can't stand the heat. | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | train | true |
694,186,072 | ` You should look up the meaning of words before using them. For one, it seems you don't know what ``redundant`` means. My edit inserted brand new information, about the lifetime practice of anal sex, which is lacking in the entry because it displeases you, so it wasn't redundant. ` | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | test | false |
694,212,970 | == Msg for Vandalisim? == Why am I getting this message on my wall? Fuck off. | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | train | true |
694,219,557 | Hello, please help me verify | 2,015 | true | user | random | train | false |
694,221,457 | ` :::::::::::::This would be easier to explain if TAG Heuer had dropped the ``TAG`` portion when they were sold to LVMH, but the answer is that it is TAG (the investment vehicle owned by Mansour Ojjeh) that owns shares in McLaren, not TAG Heuer (the watchmaker formerly owned by TAG, now owned by LVMH, that formerly sponsored McLaren and now sponsors Red Bull). I hope that's clear because after writing that sentence I am no longer certain of my own name. ` | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | test | false |
Subsets and Splits