rev_id
int64 37.7k
700M
| comment
stringlengths 5
10k
| year
int64 2k
2.02k
| logged_in
bool 2
classes | ns
stringclasses 2
values | sample
stringclasses 2
values | split
stringclasses 3
values | attack
bool 2
classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
697,145,636 | ` ==Campaign of hatred== Why have you organised a campaign of hatred against me? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ` | 2,015 | false | user | blocked | train | false |
697,146,451 | They are valid sources in themselves for the topics thy cover. However they should be cited in something like a literature review of Cynefin if they are to be cited in an article on Cynefin. | 2,015 | false | user | blocked | dev | false |
697,150,389 | Hey. Why the 2010-14 and 2105-19 Twenty20 International cricket matches pages are deleted. I do not know about its actual reason. Just inform if you can. Thanks... | 2,015 | true | user | random | test | false |
697,153,238 | Yes I am a puppet, I'm anonymous, hacker, nothing stops me. And you Ed Johnson, is so stupid to be manipulated by a Mexican , ?, or Bleckter shoves it deep by your ortho. Easy, blecker hope you block me and undo my editon in White Latin American, but acted slowly, and bleckter did it at the end, not the beginning, You only is the hand that bleckter use against me, a piece of his chess, seriously, you are very moron to not to realize. And how strange that Mr. Blecker just edit when He wants to report me or reverse my edition, he also makes edit wars and manipulates you, but I'm not weak or fag to use help of librarians, as bleckter, a Mexican user who wants to reduce percentages of in countries where whites are the majority, and increases when it does not even reach 20%. I hope that after this evidence number 50 000, out of you ignorance Mr. Ed | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | train | false |
697,158,355 | Is also necessary to create Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Bleckter, I knew that this person was a puppet, easy, it is supposed to be new, he know edit and he not received a welcome message with the functions of wikipedia (see his contributions). The puppets of this person are: Luiggi Coria (who he was blocked by personal attacks in the Spanish Wikipedia, two days) and Annie o ghorman, contributions are the same (Mexico, White Race, Latin America). | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | dev | false |
697,160,144 | == Moron == In that brothel your mother work? Go find out who is your father I'm going out of this puppet account, if you want, Block Me Till Armageddon | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | dev | true |
697,160,217 | bye bye .i. for your ortho | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | test | false |
697,166,806 | Rather than just talking about Wikipedia's guidelines and all, please stick on to the facts or at least do some research before vandalizing a certain ethnic group's identity that has been existing for thousands of years. I propose this change because it is true. Kindly tell me what proof do you want before preposterously vandalizing this content. | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | train | false |
697,169,065 | `https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newar_language Nepal Bhasa is one of the languages of Nepal, which is also known as Newa Bhaye, but official usage is Nepal Bhasa. Some people are misleadingly vandalizing the content of this page by preposterously naming it as ``Newar language`` without any scientific evidence and official resources. No one even calls it ``Newar language``. Enough proofs have been made in the talk section by other users in buttress of the term ``Nepal Bhasa,`` but each time we try to revert it to the original term, some people are vandalizing it desperately. Kindly help solve this issue on the basis of truth, fairness and equality among the users. Looking forward to hearing from you. I have requested mediation here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_mediation/It%27s_%22Nepal_Bhasa%22. ` | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | train | false |
697,169,153 | I have requested mediation here. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_mediation/It%27s_%22Nepal_Bhasa%22 | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | train | false |
697,169,400 | I've requested mediation here to solve this issue against the title of this article as embarked on by some users to misleadingly vandalize the historical facts: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_mediation/It%27s_%22Nepal_Bhasa%22 | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | dev | false |
697,172,706 | == Air dates unsourced == The bulk of the English air dates are unsourced, and as a result, are at risk of being deleted. Additions like these, which add more unsourced dates, are nice gestures, but don't make the article any more reliable. , can you source the dates you added? Thanks, | 2,015 | true | article | random | train | false |
697,187,955 | ` : All you're doing here on en-WP is plugging Amaranthe and some of the members of that band, and that's using Wikipedia for promotion. You were given a ``conflict-of-interest`` notice a while ago because of it, and I strongly suggest you click on the links in that message, and read the pages they lead to. I have removed Amaranthe from Sweden again, BTW, along with a few dozen other bands that also don't deserve mention in an article about Sweden, the country, in an encyclopaedia. Which is what Wikipedia is, not a place for plugging upcoming bands, as you seem to think... ` | 2,015 | true | user | random | train | false |
697,196,445 | :Excellent points, . I will do the same from now on. As for wasting admins' time, I don't think so. We all use the strikethrough script, right? (The one that shows blocked usernames in strikethrough italics.) Best, | 2,015 | true | user | random | dev | false |
697,201,680 | :I have restored the article as a draft, you can find it at Draft:Norma OHara Murphy. What you wrote had none of the information you claim above. GB fan | 2,015 | true | user | random | train | false |
697,233,381 | == to poor and uncultivated Boing! said Zebedee == I understand that there is a plot in wikipedia, I see it in this way and it serves me to convey the kind of ilk that have administrators of this site. I have explained a thousand times that I am not praising to anyone but if I were praising to Celia it is something she has more than deserved and it must be mentioned wherever concerning her, but apparently that bothers to several mediocres as some administrators and Wikipedia editors who know well that never going to be praised by anyone. ja ja ja handlers as you, embarrass me, it is really painful but it is the reality of Wikipedia. | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | train | true |
697,247,249 | ` Your contention has lost its ground here. You can't drop the original name of something that belongs to an ethnic group just because of some unaware wiki users unrelated to this field here couldn't find the ``common name used in reliable English-language sources``. ` | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | test | false |
697,250,203 | < Ad breaks on UK commercial TV stations are shorter and fewer than in the United States. | 2,015 | false | article | random | train | false |
697,252,841 | ` :::: The info box says ``Education: High school student``. To me, that reads as if to say ``Ethan Couch is presently a high school student.`` It does not say ``The educational level achieved by Ethan Couch is a high school level education.`` I think if we remove the word ``student``, it should be fine. Then, the info box will say ``Education: High school``. That seems to be what was originally meant, anyway, I believe. Thanks. ` | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | train | false |
697,255,451 | == Most cover appearances == The two individuals who appear on the most Dynamite magazine covers are John Schneider and Michael J. Fox. Each appears on four separate covers. John Schneider is known for his role in The Dukes of Hazzard. Michael J. Fox is known for his roles in Family Ties and the Back to the Future film franchise. I will incorporate this information into the article at some point. Thanks. | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | dev | false |
697,255,659 | (screen actor)|John Schneider | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | train | false |
697,263,434 | ` == Best wishes for the holidays... == {| style=``border:2px ; background-color: purple;`` |rowspan=``2`` valign=``right`` | |rowspan=``2`` | |style=``font-size: x-large; padding: 2; vertical-align: left; height: 1.1em;`` | Season's Greetings |- |style=``vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;`` | Wishing you a Happy Holiday Season, and all best wishes for the New Year! |}` | 2,015 | true | user | random | dev | false |
697,276,110 | i want my fucking account back this instance because someone reverted my edits at the 4 train article due to two nearly identical photos even though the b and l train articles have that too and also because of that fucking kew gardens and everyone else who won't listen to me and change the edits back to the way they were i explain quite clearly so give me my fucking account back so i can teach the person who reverted the 4 train image a good lesson | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | train | true |
697,276,506 | there's nothing wrong with the 4 train image that was reverted because the b and l train articles also have two identical photos too and i explain why to vochen and there's nothing wrong with the edits that was reverted at the 14 street 8 avenue article you guys are just being complete dickheads and hypocritical retards at best | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | train | true |
697,283,622 | : Not done: how does a link to somebody's sand collection in any way useful | 2,015 | true | article | random | train | false |
697,290,922 | 2016 world juniors your corrections to the names and details are very much appreciated. thank you. | 2,015 | true | user | random | dev | false |
697,297,369 | ::::Thanks, Alan. Yes, that is all persuasive, esp. the explanation for the odd notice dating their acquaintanceship back several years to 1799. Excellent. | 2,015 | true | article | random | train | false |
697,305,987 | : I read some and think it's an article worthy to be shown. If it doesn't work out, consider to create a related article (a person, an institution teaching it ...) and make a hook mentioning the philosophy. It will get not as much attention as the bolded article, but a lot, promised. I did that for many Bach cantatas which I couldn't expand five times: create a singer's article, then say that the singer performed the cantata. In 2015, I made them GA instead ;) | 2,015 | true | user | random | train | false |
697,312,144 | ` == Requested move 29 December 2015 == :Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah → – ``sayyed`` is an honorific, which should not be used in article names (per WP:HONORIFIC). The article was recently renamed without consensus to include the honorific, with an unsupported claim that 'sayyed' is actually part of his name, and not an honorific, a claim which is contradicted in the lead. ` | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | train | false |
697,324,102 | == Inaccurate plot/story == Just a note, that is not the real plot. | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | dev | false |
697,327,263 | trembler quickie against the walls of | 2,015 | true | user | random | test | false |
697,331,862 | :::Excellent, thank you. At some point I shall tart up the text a little as well. happy New Year! | 2,015 | true | user | random | dev | false |
697,337,526 | ` ==Crowding of images/personalities== It seems to me that user Jaqeli has had a monopoly over the inclusion/exclusion of various personalities in this article. An unfortunate result of this is that the infobox, as it remained, was crowded and included some individuals who pre-dated the very concept of ``Georgian`` (Rhadamistus, Queen Zenobia etc). It also included questionable and embellished titles like ``the wolfhead``, ``the great``, including cases in which such usage in English is uncommon.The page has to cease being an embellished piece of puffery, or the images must be removed entirely, in accordance with a recent consensus. ` | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | test | false |
697,339,621 | Please see the discussion on this topic. and seem accustomed to having articles written their own way, including instances in which the material is poorly sourced or unsupported. As I already stated, these users should have discussed their controversial insertions before they were made, not after the fact. It seems they just do things to see if it sticks. | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | train | false |
697,358,146 | == please do not write me more!! Silly == Perhaps no one has told you but you're obviously frustrated and I would like that please do not write me more. For my part I have decided that I will not bring anything more to wikipedia, because wikipedia is a monopoly of information manipulated by a lot of abnormals like you. | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | train | false |
697,403,517 | * Support – I agree with BMK. Bismark is a clear example where there is a primary topic which is the enduring inspiration for the way the word is used elsewhere. Such cases should always link to the primary, inspirational topic, even if it isn't (though it is here) the most accessed usage. A parallel example is Corvette, which links to a type of naval boat and not to a US car named after the boat. Another parallel example is Mustang, which links to a type of horse, and not to another US car named after the horse. Both these cases triggered vigorous but lame opposition. Hopefully the matter here will be decided in a more sensible and direct way. | 2,015 | true | article | random | train | false |
697,426,578 | ` == Origin of the (Utigur) Huns. == Roman historians Themistius(317-390), Claudian(370-404), and later Procopius(500-560) called the Huns Massagetae.``The World of the Huns``, Otto Maenchen-Helfen, page 4:``But considering that Themistius, Claudian, and later Procopius called the Huns Massagetae,...`` The Huns were called Massagetae also by Ambrose(340-397), Ausonius(310-394), Synesius(373–414), Zacharias Rhetor(465-535), Belisarius(500-565), Evagrius Scholasticus(6th century) and others. Alexander Cunningham, B.S. Dahiya(1980, 23) and Edgar Knobloch(2001, 15) identify Massagetae with the Great Yuezhi: Da Yuezhi -> Ta-Yue-ti(Great Lunar Race) -> Ta-Gweti -> Massa-Getae. Dahiya wrote about the Massagetae and Thyssagetae ``These Guti people had two divisions, the Ta-Yue-Che and Siao-Yue-Che, exactly corresponding to the Massagetae and Thyssagetae of Herodotus ... `` (Dahiya 1980, 23). Thyssagetae, who are known as the Lesser Getae, correspond with the Xiao Yuezhi, meaning Lesser Yuezhi.SINO-PLATONIC PAPERS, Number 127 October, 2003, page 22-24, http://www.sino-platonic.org/complete/spp127_getes.pdf` | 2,015 | false | article | blocked | train | false |
697,426,720 | ` == Origin of the (Kutrigur) Huns == Roman historians Themistius(317-390), Claudian(370-404), and later Procopius(500-560) called the Huns Massagetae.``The World of the Huns``, Otto Maenchen-Helfen, page 4:``But considering that Themistius, Claudian, and later Procopius called the Huns Massagetae,...`` The Huns were called Massagetae also by Ambrose(340-397), Ausonius(310-394), Synesius(373–414), Zacharias Rhetor(465-535), Belisarius(500-565), Evagrius Scholasticus(6th century) and others. Alexander Cunningham, B.S. Dahiya(1980, 23) and Edgar Knobloch(2001, 15) identify Massagetae with the Great Yuezhi: Da Yuezhi -> Ta-Yue-ti(Great Lunar Race) -> Ta-Gweti -> Massa-Getae. Dahiya wrote about the Massagetae and Thyssagetae ``These Guti people had two divisions, the Ta-Yue-Che and Siao-Yue-Che, exactly corresponding to the Massagetae and Thyssagetae of Herodotus ... `` (Dahiya 1980, 23). Thyssagetae, who are known as the Lesser Getae, correspond with the Xiao Yuezhi, meaning Lesser Yuezhi.SINO-PLATONIC PAPERS, Number 127 October, 2003, page 22-24, http://www.sino-platonic.org/complete/spp127_getes.pdf` | 2,015 | false | article | blocked | dev | false |
697,426,949 | ` == Origin of the Huns == Roman historians Themistius(317-390), Claudian(370-404), and later Procopius(500-560) called the Huns Massagetae.``The World of the Huns``, Otto Maenchen-Helfen, page 4:``But considering that Themistius, Claudian, and later Procopius called the Huns Massagetae,...`` The Huns were called Massagetae also by Ambrose(340-397), Ausonius(310-394), Synesius(373–414), Zacharias Rhetor(465-535), Belisarius(500-565), Evagrius Scholasticus(6th century) and others. Alexander Cunningham, B.S. Dahiya(1980, 23) and Edgar Knobloch(2001, 15) identify Massagetae with the Great Yuezhi: Da Yuezhi -> Ta-Yue-ti(Great Lunar Race) -> Ta-Gweti -> Massa-Getae. Dahiya wrote about the Massagetae and Thyssagetae ``These Guti people had two divisions, the Ta-Yue-Che and Siao-Yue-Che, exactly corresponding to the Massagetae and Thyssagetae of Herodotus ... `` (Dahiya 1980, 23). Thyssagetae, who are known as the Lesser Getae, correspond with the Xiao Yuezhi, meaning Lesser Yuezhi.SINO-PLATONIC PAPERS, Number 127 October, 2003, page 22-24, http://www.sino-platonic.org/complete/spp127_getes.pdf` | 2,015 | false | article | blocked | train | false |
697,438,785 | == Benfica transfer == Please, Mr. SLBedit, important to retain both refs, the one you added and the one I added and you removed without one word in summary. The Diário de Notícias source contains details about his transfer, if you can find an ENGLISH source that says the same (Barcelona has rebuy option, contract was about to expire), sure, you can remove the Portuguese one. Attentively | 2,015 | false | article | blocked | train | false |
697,451,150 | FWIW, as the editor who reported this user, I believe this may indeed have been a misunderstanding of policy by a new, non native English speaking user, and I would be ok with shortening his block to 'time served'. | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | train | false |
697,465,417 | == Sorry == I do apologise for vandalising your userpage. I did that in order to draw your attention because I would be interested into knowing why you didn't report me for my alleged sockpuppetery? | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | train | false |
697,471,088 | ::Can I whsssssssssssssssssssssssssssper it in your ear ? | 2,015 | false | user | blocked | train | false |
697,471,988 | Why did you try to get my admin password? | 2,015 | false | user | blocked | train | false |
697,472,603 | You will be my #1 target now. I pity #2. | 2,015 | false | user | blocked | train | false |
697,511,630 | ` ::escape orbit (yeah, I did that on purpose), It looks like I am going to have to be uncivil to you because you are not getting my point otherwise. Simply put, you are a moron. Yes, you were being uncivil to me by assuming that I said ``because I want it in.`` I never said that. That's how morons think, and hence this description for you. Your tone has been at least as combative as you think mine has, so you are the one who needs to calm down. Wikipedia editing actually isn't for you. ::You obviously don't know quite how 3RR works. If someone reverts more than 3 times in the same day's worth of time, then they have broken 3RR. Not until then. ::You guys may not be on the same exact team, but you claim ``consensus`` despite that I'm not part of that as one of the editors in the dispute. You still have not answered why you guys in that supposed ``consensus`` have gone deeper than you were already satisfied with before. Perhaps I should ask the one who is doing it most recently, fakesmile. In fact, even he or she is edit-warring now. Just because s/he's part of your consensus doesn't mean s/he's not edit-warring. So there's that issue too. ::Okay, , when you first started your reversion junk here, even you would only revert to the point of where escape orbit left the ``(stylized as 'ebay')`` in place without the old version. Go back up and look at his bullets here and then look at your reversions. All of you who were doing those early reversions in your little group that you called ``consensus`` were originally only reverting to the point of leaving the mention of the current style in the lead, according to the earlier discussion here. Originally you guys were only saying that mentioning the former style in the lead was ``too much`` for you, so you didn't erase them both. Why are you guys erasing them both now, even though the original concern was only against the old' one? :: ` | 2,015 | false | article | blocked | train | false |
697,513,147 | ` ::You, escape orbit, have assumed bad faith. Remember the times you falsely called me a ``vandal``? What do you call that assumption, huh? ` | 2,015 | false | article | blocked | train | true |
697,514,604 | `There's a BIG difference between that stupid thing you just falsely put on my keyboard and this quote: ``It explains that there's the difference between text-only 'eBay' and the actual logo that's more like 'ebay', but also the distinction between that same lame text-only 'eBay' and how it used to be styled, which was ' 'ebaY' ''' until late 2012.`` ::` | 2,015 | false | article | blocked | train | true |
697,514,711 | stylescurrent only vs. both vs. none | 2,015 | false | article | blocked | train | false |
697,514,755 | as in other articles | 2,015 | false | article | blocked | train | false |
697,516,268 | == December 2015 edit-warring == | 2,015 | false | user | blocked | test | false |
697,541,505 | ` ==Name of Georgia== I recently edited the section about the etymology of ``Georgia`` to reflect the fact that there is no definitive theory as to the name's origin. My changes were reverted and now the section is back to the version with questionable assertions and weasel words, such as ``probably``, ``may be``, ``clearly``, ``presumably``, etc. It is not the prerogative of wikipedia editors to create a synthesis of different theories to reach a single ``probable``, ``clear`` or ``presumable`` conclusion. For this reason, I would like to rework the section in the following way, which I think is appropriate given the divergence of theories. Any additions or suggestions are also welcome. ` | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | train | false |
697,541,689 | REDIRECT Talk:Minor Basilica of Our Lady of Walsingham | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | dev | false |
697,551,204 | Thank you, . I hope that you and yours have enjoyed the holiday season (so far) and have the happiest of new years! — / | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | train | false |
697,551,464 | :Yikes! I can only imagine what it took to write a Featured Article in the bad old days. Thank you, . I hope that you and yours have the happiest of new years! — / | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | train | false |
697,555,710 | `{{Unblock|I'll make a renewed effort not to give personal attacks. But of course I do have some questions about this unwarranted blockage, as you might well imagine: 1. Why is it that IP editors tend to get the raw ends of the deal: that you ``admins`` tend to lean towards the side of someone who's editing with an account over someone who's editing without one, especially in the area of what you label as ``personal attacks`` or ``harassment`` when given by the IP-editor but not so much when the named editor does the same thing? 2. For exampleand this is... yep, maybe you guessed it... question 2: Why is it supposedly ``okay`` (according to you) for someone with a name... like, say... escape orbit... to dish out a personal attack, but not for me to give him one back because I'm just a lowly IP-editor? Specifically, why is it supposedly ``okay`` for him to give me a personal attack by putting false stuff on my keyboard by making the ludicrous claim that my reason for wanting the old style of ``ebaY`` logo to go next to the current one, ``ebay,`` in the lead, is ``because I wanted it in there,`` even though that is a total lie; but it's supposedly ``not okay`` for me to call that kind of slander stupid? 3. Here's another one: Why is it supposedly ``okay`` for him and ``smiley girl`` there to falsely accuse my edits of being ``vandalism`` just because they differed from what these guys preferred, but then when I say their reversions are vandalism, I get in trouble for it as if it were a ``personal attack`` just because I'm an IP-only editor? 4. Ready for one more? Then why is it fine for any of you named editors to give one of us IP-editors a warning template, but when I, as an IPer do the same thing to a named editor like I did to partially smiley girl, I get dinged with ``Oh, you can't do that 'cause that's a 'personal attack',`` or ``Oh, that's bad because that's 'harassment' ``? 5. Oh yeah, here's one more! Remember the rule about edit-warring (just in general, meaning that it doesn't even have to be breaking 3RR) that says that `` 'but I was right, so I was not edit-warring' is no defense``? Well then doesn't that apply to meeting some so-called ``consensus`` too (since some things aren't cases of concrete correctness but are just based more on whether they match what that so-called ``consensus`` wanted the thing to say)? Well then why is it that just because your named friend smiley there does some edit-warring against me to put the thing back to what your exclusive (partial) ``consensus`` wants it to say, AND since my editing had already been established as NOT vandalism even though it disagrees, you ignore that above-mentioned edit-warring rule and give her/him a pass anyway, but when I, an IP-only editor who's against your exclusive ``consensus,`` do the same thing, it's ``edit-warring`` even though it was the same thing as what smiley's doing (remember the ``being-right/matching-consensus-is-no-defense`` rule)? ` | 2,015 | false | user | blocked | test | false |
697,573,161 | `, 31 December 2015 (UTC) :::::: They are difficult to understand out of context (and the context involves other articles). It'll take me time, but I'll be putting together the diffs and the context for a case against them both over the next few months. 🍁 10:21` | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | dev | false |
697,574,393 | == papal bull == you are not going to get copies of papal bull since chanceries are now strict at releasing copies of papal bull due to possibly plagiarism, especially in social media. we have way too many devotees claiming honors and prestige when there is no proof from Rome that such are designated by the Pope or their prefects. | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | test | false |
697,582,601 | == Mr Tom == These are peanut bars, they don't contain chocolate. I don't understand why Mr Tom features in this list. It should presumably be deleted. | 2,015 | true | article | random | dev | false |
697,584,978 | :Ah. It was a branch. Article clarified now. | 2,015 | true | article | random | train | false |
697,590,934 | ` :As you wish, please discuss it at Talk:Kwara#Proposed_merge_from_Kwarans. – ` | 2,015 | true | user | random | train | false |
697,599,389 | Thank you for retiring == Wikipedia is so much better off without you. However, society should be a little concerned, because without Wikipedia to fill the void in your life you are probably now a ticking time bomb. == | 2,015 | false | user | blocked | train | false |
697,610,725 | == The Beatles == What's your blody problem? I can't edit in wikipedia only just you say it? Don't screw me. | 2,015 | false | user | blocked | test | false |
697,611,620 | == The Beatles == What's your blody problem? I can't edit in wikipedia only just you say it? Don't screw me. :I'm vandalizing articles? you're a poorly loser without an own life. Allen Klein was the final Beatles' manager and if you read his article he hire Phil Spector for mix the Let It Be album. Also Klein fired a lot of people of Apple Corps and Magic Alex, a close friend of John Lennon and director of Apple Electronics. You are the vadalizer; deleting information when you don't know about am especific topic. | 2,015 | false | user | blocked | train | true |
697,627,388 | == Harassment == OK, I will let harass this guy if he don't harass me with my editing that isn't vandalic. | 2,015 | false | user | blocked | train | false |
697,633,374 | you are very hypocritical why don't you knock it off with the constant reverting images to the 4, b and l train articles will you | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | train | true |
697,633,724 | Isn't that what the first sentence does? And why aren't my questions evidence that the block was wrong? And why won't anyone answer them? | 2,015 | false | user | blocked | test | false |
697,633,852 | shouldn't have been given in the first place | 2,015 | false | user | blocked | dev | false |
697,634,294 | ` == Happy New Year, {{SAFESUBST:BASEPAGENAME}}! == {{SAFESUBST:BASEPAGENAME}},Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia! ~~ ` | 2,015 | true | user | random | dev | false |
697,639,821 | ` == Re: ``Reverts`` == Hello, Drmargi. I'd like to take this opportunity to thank you for saying what needed to be said to me, but in a very respectful, sophisticated manner. I've taken the time to review both articles you referenced, especially personal attacks. While what I said was not directed at any specific person, it was in direct conflict with a portion of what constitutes a personal attack. For that, I'd like to apologize. The reason I verbally came out swinging, so to speak, is because of misdirected frustration. There is an individual with whom I had a conflict regarding the episode page of another show, a show about which I'm almost as passionate as I am about Person of Interest, and that very same person if one of those who reverted my edit (mind you, for good reason I now know), however, when this took place on another TV show's page, he was extremely passive aggressive and hostile in his immediate discrediting of my editing abilities. I had just started using Wikipedia at the time and was not very proficient in computational cyber protocol, or even writing code (that is not the case anymore) Please do not misinterpret this, as I know I am the one in the wrong, and I am not trying to engage in a dialogue in which I somehow look like the victim. I just feel as though I needed to explain myself, and who better with whom to do so than the one of 4 users on Wikipedia who have shown me respect and made me feel welcome. I am well aware that the world will not end if the POI Season 5 info is not complete (lol). If I thought the world were to end, I wouldn't be on my computer. But passive aggression aside, I sincerely am a person who loves Person of Interest and Criminal Minds, as they have helped me deal with deep-seeded problems in my own life, as far-fetched as that may sound, so I make it my business to do the best I can to help keep fellow fans as informed as possible, and Wikipedia is an amazing vessel through which to do so. In my mind, I saw how many little error notices Wikipedia has put on the POI episode lists and wondered why my mistake was IMMEDIATELY centered out, but whoever made the mistakes of adding too long of an episode summary, over 40 times, was not reprimanded. However, it is foolish to assume they weren't. I reacted much in disproportion to the situation, and I do not intend to do so again, as I want to respect Wikipedia's rules. I just felt that a specific user had discredited my information for the sole purpose of undermining me. That did, in fact, happen on a page for Criminal Minds and I was the aggrieved party in that case. My information was solid, came straight from a co-executive producer, and yet this person continued reverting it, so I sought help and reported him. However, to think that same scenario applies to this POI conflict... I now see how slanted and nonsensical that is. In conclusion, I will not add information unless it can be traced back to an original source, credible and solid. (like my addition of Fred Toye as director and Andy Callahan as co-writer of POI episode 5-10 - the 100th) I do apologize if I've offended you with my two aggressive edit summaries, as they were the result of misdirected anger and frustration. Thank you for informing me of where I went wrong, and remaining respectful and composed. I love to learn, and I'm glad I've learned more specific information about how to avoid reference/edit info-conflicts. I also want you to know that I'm well aware that Wikipedia is not a fan site. While I intend to show you the utmost respect, that was uncalled for. I can read - very well, in fact. Je peux parler en Français aussi, et je peux le comprendre. I know that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, that is why I try to be as thorough as possible, and if this sentence comes off as condescending, that is because you offended me as well. I did not insult you, or anyone specifically; what I did was make a childish, anger-driven, juvenile comparison of whoever reverted my edits to royalty, or self-appointed leaders. It was a mistake to do so, and since I'm not very good at conflict resolution - the fact that this is my best attempt to mend fences proves that - I'm going to stop now because I'm starting to argue with my own intentions. Please forgive my outburst, and be assured that it won't happen again. I will continue to help build a stronger Season 5 episode table with solid references, but I fully intend to adhere to the rules and keep my opinions of other editors to myself. Thank you for helping me to stay informed, so that I can continue to inform fellow TV Crime Drama fans. Happy editing and thank you for your kindness and composure in this matter. B. Edward Bef3481(2) ` | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | train | false |
697,640,333 | see my messages to kew garden's talk page for more details and info | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | train | false |
697,643,737 | besides if my edits are useless then how come i went out of my way and try to explain to you then? you just keep saying they are wrong because you don't like them, that's being dismissive and that's not the way to be logical about it. | 2,015 | true | user | random | train | false |
697,659,663 | :Thank you, it's appreciated. The same to you ) | 2,015 | true | user | random | train | false |
697,676,542 | ` == Happy New Year, Floquenbeam! == `` class=``plainlinks``> Floquenbeam,Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. : ` | 2,016 | true | user | random | test | false |
697,691,212 | == Trouted == You have been trouted for: YOUR REASON HERE Ass Hole | 2,016 | false | user | blocked | train | true |
697,691,480 | == NFL Network and CBS partnership broke off for 2016 == CBS contract with Thursday Night Football expired. | 2,016 | false | user | blocked | train | false |
697,759,179 | ` ::Thank you Callmemirela for the link to the investigation. Hmmm, it does indeed look like a case of ``If it looks like a duck...``. I hope you took no offence to my above comment... you see, my involvement in this whole saga is rather limited, and once he indicated to me he was being accused, I wanted to know if there was any ongoing investigation so I could see the evidence to myself. Yes I saw that two IPs were disputing over the same content, I even mentioned to 86.149.35.180 that it ``looks a little, strange, to say the least``. ` | 2,016 | true | user | random | train | false |
697,773,948 | ` == Happy New Year, Renamed user ea6416fc! == `` class=``plainlinks``> Renamed user ea6416fc,Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. : ` | 2,016 | true | user | random | test | false |
697,774,172 | William Guy Redmond Jr inventor and innovator for over 60 years. Inventions including Fly-by-wire,autothrottle and auxiliary control lever or joystick. His patents numbers. 2,787,746. Auxiliary servo control Re 24,701 servo control 3,060,362 automatic synchronizer 3,289,490 override mechanism 3,302,064 Frenquency monitor 3,307,095 moisture controlled motor system 3,362,661 Autothrottle 1,120,327 German 1,120,327 U.K. 3,386,022 closures closer upon occurrence of precipitation 3,427,522 solid-state synchronizer 3,426,864 multi-phase voltage monitor 3,613,276 chart flipper 3,646,754 multiplex servo pump 3,679,156 Fly-by-wire 3,579,958 Fail-Operate control system 3,735,228 Electrical non Electronic servo 4,006,391 Linearized pulse width. Modulator 4,236,716 Speed Control system w/o Tach Feedback 4,464,661 Fail-Safe Nose Gear Steering System | 2,016 | true | user | random | test | false |
697,786,698 | ` == NYC is NOT the ``center`` of the Puerto Rican American community !!! == On EVERY page regarding Puerto Ricans, you make it seem like New York is the epicenter for Puerto Ricans across the world. I have news for you buddy: IT IS NOT! Period Stop making it seem like newyork is the glorious wonderful capital for alll Boricuas worldwide, f*ck new york. Cuz obviously we dont like that city no more, alot more Puerto Ricans moving to Orlando, Tampa, Philly, and even Boston, from both Puerto Rico AND New York. NY has a declining PR population, who tf wants to go there, the ones who are there are leaving in droves.` | 2,016 | true | user | blocked | train | false |
697,790,221 | == Fuck == Fuck you rapist | 2,016 | true | user | blocked | dev | true |
697,796,623 | REDIRECT Talk:UFC Fight Night: Cerrone vs. Means | 2,016 | true | article | blocked | train | false |
697,805,403 | == Take Some Time To Reflect == Take some time to reflect. One of your favorite personal attacks was to declare others of being incompetent or illiterate and having no business contributing to an encyclopedia. The irony may not be immediately apparent, but now essentially you have declared yourself of having no business contributing to an encyclopedia. As many of your defenders allude to, your harassment of others and frequent violations of our Wikipedia ethics and rules were of grand portion. You were safe guarded by administrative friends who tolerated your behavior, while attacking those you engaged that exhibited only a fraction of your misbehavior. If you felt under siege or harassed, take a moment to reflect on how your behavior contributed to your situation. If after reflection, you feel you can follow our guidelines here at wikipedia, please come out of retirement. | 2,016 | false | user | blocked | dev | false |
697,806,674 | ` ==Regressive left== Can you take a moment to clarify what you meant by your edit summary, ``reading comprehension problems, here``, on the Talk page. Thanks. ` | 2,016 | true | user | random | train | false |
697,812,770 | == Sspx == You should join that autistic Pope in Rome and go fuck yourselves with Sin until all your maggot brains turn into soup. | 2,016 | true | user | blocked | train | true |
697,820,868 | :Thank you, . Belated congratulations on your becoming an administrator. I hope that you and yours have the happiest of new years! — / | 2,016 | true | user | blocked | train | false |
697,839,976 | ` == List of Gatchaman Fighter episodes == Hi, please familiarize yourself with our Manual of Style on writing about fiction, as well as the essay ``How to write a plot summary``. Your episode summaries are problematic for several reasons. A plot summary should be concise and only detail the main events, not a blow-by-blow detail of every minor thing that occurs. As they currently are, they are much too long and go into unnecessary details, defeating the point of a summary. You shouldn't just be rehashing everything that happens on the screen, but condensing the episodes to the major events. A plot summary should also be written from an out-of-universe perspective. It should be written as if you were writing about the episode, not as if you were the characters. They should also follow neutral point of view without personal views or comments. Most importantly: Your summaries likely do not meet fair use standards. You cannot gratuitously quote multiple lines of dialogue and also rephrase every detail including sound effects; you've effectively written your own script which is a derivative work of the original, violating copyright. It is because of these reasons that I have reverted your editions wholesale. I would normally try to cut the details down to usable portions but unfortunately I am not familiar with the series and cannot make judgements on which portions are relevant. I would suggest starting from scratch while focusing on which points are the most important while aiming for between 400-700 words. Do not add sound effects and try to adhere to a neutral point of view, keeping in mind that you are writing about fiction, and only quoting characters when necessary. Of course, your edits are still available in the history for your reference or if you should choose to cut those down instead. Please let me know if you have any questions and see WikiProject_Anime_and_manga/Quality_articles#Featured_lists for examples of lists considered to be the highest quality on Wikipedia. ` | 2,016 | true | user | random | train | false |
697,862,568 | is violating the rules of Wikipedia. Erasing of full information is violating the standards. | 2,016 | true | user | blocked | dev | false |
697,863,229 | measures and actions. You are already in the hot list in Miss Earth. Thanks. | 2,016 | true | user | blocked | train | false |
697,865,641 | == Your Harassment At AndyTheGrump Talk == Legitimate, constructive criticism is not harassment. Ironically, if in some alternate universe it was, calling it harassment would also be harassment, even if your repeated reverts were not already. Apparently you miss the irony that you have validated the criticism. By labeling legitimate, constructive criticism that pales in comparrison to AndyTheGrump's vitriol as harassment, you prove that AndyTheGrumps carte blanche was gifted to hm by coddling Admins. | 2,016 | false | user | blocked | dev | false |
697,894,131 | ::If that information was stored on the account, it was exposed, please fill out the form too. Thanks. | 2,016 | true | article | blocked | dev | false |
697,897,151 | == Official single == The song is now the sixth single from 1989 and was released on the same date the music video was premiered. Sourced from The Guardian where it states that it is the sixth official single from the album. | 2,016 | true | article | blocked | train | false |
697,897,624 | :Just because the source is old, it doesn't make the information invalid. I doubt you can provide a source which back up your claims. On that basis, edits reverted. | 2,016 | true | article | blocked | test | false |
697,904,347 | ` ==Sockpuppet investigation== ` | 2,016 | true | user | random | train | false |
697,905,190 | ::::The large sum of sources and Valve disagree with you. If it wasn't a big deal, Valve wouldn't be contacting those affected. It belongs in the article, but no more than a single sentence. | 2,016 | true | article | blocked | train | false |
697,913,451 | == Top girls == There are some players in the Top 20 girls rating list who are neither WGM nor national/continental/world champions. The list is updated every month, so they may not stay there forever. I don't think being in the list stands for notability. | 2,016 | true | article | random | train | false |
697,937,099 | `*Oppose Cultural Marxism ``conspiracy theory`` didn't originate from Cultural Bolshevism. ` | 2,016 | true | article | blocked | dev | false |
697,951,746 | ` == Style mention in lead == It wasn't to just ``make a point.`` It was to help the encyclopedia be consistent. Consistency is not ``disruptive.`` Oh, and why supposedly ``doesn't`` the rule for one article apply to the same type of content in other articles? ` | 2,016 | false | user | blocked | train | false |
697,958,429 | giving out someones personal information, and it shows you how much of an idiot you are. | 2,016 | true | user | blocked | train | true |
697,969,078 | ` == Clean up and criticism == I attempted a bit of a clean up, I don't know if it is sufficient to remove the tags at the top. If I have a general criticism to make of the article, it is based on the remarkable *lack* of sources to substantiate the topic. Personally, it feels to me as if some individuals are trying to make more out of subject title than is supported by the references. That is to say, they have been pushing the idea of the dog as a breed. Even moreso relating to the nickname ``INDog``. I'm also not sure about the watering down of the definition of ``pariah``. Consequently, I'm also a little suspicious of the direction Pariah dog topic has been taken in, e.g. who are the ``dog experts`` they claim? The Wikipedian author themselves? ` | 2,016 | true | article | blocked | train | false |
Subsets and Splits