rev_id
int64
37.7k
700M
comment
stringlengths
5
10k
year
int64
2k
2.02k
logged_in
bool
2 classes
ns
stringclasses
2 values
sample
stringclasses
2 values
split
stringclasses
3 values
attack
bool
2 classes
18,837,704
` == Dubya suggestion == Not exactly sure where this would go... just a suggestion: :One of Bush's nicknames is ``W.`` Some people from Texas pronounce it as ``Dubya.`` This was used by some Bush supporters during the campaign who thought it would show a ``down-home`` charm. However, it was quickly picked up by his detractors who claimed it was a sign of his, and his supporters, supposed lack of intelligence. Any good? I think a mention of ``Dubya`` should go in the article, but not in a POV way. I could used help with my own POV if the above bit is seen as biased... please help me out. `
2,005
true
article
blocked
train
false
18,837,979
much better than simply removing it. glad to see people an compromise, and add text that isn't extremly pro-bush. -steve
2,005
false
article
blocked
dev
false
18,838,617
much less biased than removing it, or the rest of the article steve
2,005
false
article
blocked
train
false
18,839,605
`and exactly which one of those was not appropriate to link to ``dubya``? -steve `
2,005
false
article
blocked
test
false
18,839,692
`:::::LOL, I just have to reply to Danny Muse's reply to Elenap. It's not nice, but I have to speak. When will you get it Danny? Propaganda and logical fallacies are not a reasonable method of influencing people, especially if you are claiming to represent God and be a Christian, so why do you continue with them and your specious reasoning? All the points in your reply can easily be refuted. You said above: ``If text in one place is inappropriate or excessive . . .`` You have totally failed to prove the premise of your argument, but you then presumptuously assume that everyone will just blindly accept your wanted opinions as facts, and so you come out with a straw man argument about ``inappropriate and excessive``. You get the medal for surreptitious false reasoning. You then go on with another blatantly false statement: ``And as far as this section being POV, its title, ``Books Critical of the Group`` proves that it is by definition a POV section.`` Danny, how exactly is something that is 'critical' proof that it is biased or POV? You have failed totally to make even the most basic case for your assumed conclusions; you just jump there with one giant false leap. Criticism is not by default proof of a bias, POV, or non-objectivity as you incorrectly assume. For example, if you said ``five plus five is thirteen``, someone could objectively and neutrally criticise your ability at maths, and your conclusion, and prove you wrong, without having any biased point of view, or dubious agenda. Facts can be proven false or true, that is the rational basis of objective reasoning. Merely being critical is not a valid cause for rejection of the one criticising, as you manipulatively try and twist into its meaning with more ad hominem. You also ignore the hypocrisy of your argument, as Jehovah's Witnesses have masses of material heavily criticising other religions, so by your default, it should all be rejected as POV, biased, and highly subjective, and of little of no value. You have shot yourself in the foot Danny. You then go on with paragraphs of irrelevant red herrings, straw men, and more ad hominem character assassinations, in true Watch Tower fashion. You should read these Watch Tower articles on criticism and open-mindedness. :::::You come out with even more logical fallacies, by mentioning subjects that do not apply, and hoping the less knowledgeable reader will fall for your 'guilt by association' machinations. You speak about ``disaffected individuals, apostates, and anti-cult movements``, as if this somehow applies to Franz, when you have proven nothing. I'm sure I could get a host of quotes telling us all how sick and degenerate paedophiles are, and link that to you, and plenty of people would fall for that one if said over and over enough times, and the trick would have worked, no one would listen to anything you have to say if they believed you were messing about with little children. Your corrupt use of negative propaganda is disgusting, especially as you claim to be a Christian. I suggest you read your religion's articles on propaganda, you might learn to be more objective and less scheming in your arguments. :::::You then say: ``Especially suspect are ``Individuals who take up a cause for personal gain`` by publishing books, etc.`` LOL, I nearly fell on the floor with laughter with that one! Hey, Danny, look in the mirror! The Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society makes nearly a '$$$Billion$$$ US Dollars a year, a large part coming from its massive literature sales, most to loyal JWs. They also dodge paying their taxes on that massive income, this depleting the local community of needed funds (except in France where they have to pay their taxes, and are calling on ``Satan's European governments`` to fight Jehovah's scriptural worldly tax arrangements, LOL). The greed of the publishing Watch Tower is terrible, but interestingly not a peep of condemnation from Danny about those Watch Tower ``Especially suspect 'Individuals who take up a cause for personal gain' by publishing books``. Pure gold from Danny Muse! :::::You then go on: ``There are not similar books listed on the WP pages for the Catholic religion. . .`` Since when did JWs love to link themselves with Catholics? Besides Catholics being a specially hated religion by Jehovah's Witnesses, it is completely different in its size, history and doctrines, and its treatment if those who criticise it. There are over 1 billion Catholics, and a 1500 year old religion, with massive tradition etc., why on earth would it be described the same as a 120 year old cult like prophecy obsessed group that treats its internal critics like demon possessed monsters, and then expels them and bans its members from
2,005
true
article
blocked
train
false
18,839,908
fuck you you cock biting jew licker. -steve
2,005
false
user
blocked
train
true
18,840,135
doesn't count when peole just revert and then don't say jack ont he talk page. they were being biased, and that's a fact. if they had responded on the talk page, it would be different. - steve
2,005
false
article
blocked
test
false
18,840,196
still missing something.... care to explain what just happened? i didnt do it on purpose, whatever it was...
2,005
false
user
blocked
train
false
18,840,405
still don't see how that is wrong. it was a redneck article, ina rednecks in contemporary society section, adding the fact that bush, who is a redneck(fact) is the US presiednet (fact) on his second term(fact) facts is facts is facts buddy. -steve
2,005
false
article
blocked
dev
false
18,840,521
` :::``steve`` is it??? You are out of line. You may not like Bush or his views or policies, but you cannot just call him a redneck and moron. He had a pretty good upbringing and was educated at Yale. And don't start with the whole ``his daddy got him in`` thing. He did the work, not the best work, granted, but he graduated. He has shown himself to be a very good businessman, and you shouldn't throw bias around. Don't start name calling just because you don't like him. There are better ways to destroy your enemy than with name calling. Oh well. Just my opinion. `
2,005
true
article
blocked
dev
false
18,840,630
it's unfortunate that your mother didn't quif you out the day she was raped by the pig you call a father you sodomite bible thumping nazi. -steve ::It is unlikely this individual speaks for (or belongs to) the left. :: nope, can't you tell from the lack of education and the hate speach i am a right winger? go dubya yuk yuk yuk
2,005
false
user
blocked
train
true
18,840,943
appologies for that. was not intentional. -steve.
2,005
false
user
blocked
train
false
18,841,289
` appologies for the racist remarks, let the general moronics and asshole-itude of the cockbites on the ``dubya`` page get to me. I've learned my lesson. Apparently the majority is always unbiased and right on wikipedia, will bring re-ienforcments to unbias the article next time. i guess this is yet another case of democrasy failing us. -steve oh and RyanFreisling is a mother humping, father felating dubya fonding, assmuncher of the highest order, right below catholic priests, rush limbaugh, and michael jackson on the fag-o-meter.`
2,005
false
user
blocked
train
false
18,845,638
I have filed a request for comment on NCdave. You can visit the page by going
2,005
true
article
blocked
dev
false
18,850,595
It was a reference to something, if you didn't have the intellegence of a 5 year old, then you understand it. You liberal meshugina.
2,005
true
user
blocked
train
false
18,850,903
Then you're a communist, because you are not Zod like me, so you cannot have the same opinions on things as Zod. Boo yah.
2,005
true
user
blocked
dev
false
18,851,194
I don't compare people to Hitler because that is pointless, because no one is like Hitler. You are an evil nazi, but you're not a Hitler-like evil nazi.
2,005
true
user
blocked
dev
false
18,851,800
I know that's not mature. And anyway, that was my cousin, I went to the bathroom, and he got on for awhile and was being an idiot. So don't talk to me like I did anything for I am Zod and I can break you, so leave it.
2,005
true
user
blocked
test
false
18,852,415
You ignoramus! My cousin just did the hitler pictures and the swastikas and what not. I've been the one talking to you you imbecile. I can't believe that people that are stupid like you exist. It makes we want to start playing russian roulette with myself.
2,005
true
user
blocked
train
true
18,854,423
==Image copyright tags== Thanks for uploading Image:Odyssey1.jpg. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use if you release it under the GFDL, or if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much, '✉ ==Image copyright tags== Thanks for uploading Image:Odyssey2.jpg. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use if you release it under the GFDL, or if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much, '✉ ==Image copyright tags== Thanks for uploading Image:Odyssey3.jpg. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use if you release it under the GFDL, or if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much, ''''✉
2,005
true
user
random
test
false
18,870,228
` :::::::Hello Tom, thanks for your reply. You are correct; I should not laugh at Danny Muse, as it is more depressing than funny to see a cult-like mentality in action, especially on the doors, where many of the public can easily be fooled by Danny's type of false reasoning if they are not careful. I was not making a ``personal attack``, I was attcking his false reasoning. All my criticism of his false manipulative arguments, and deliberate attempts at deceit all still stand. Interesting, I see you do not criticise him for calling people ``idiots, and pigs``, why is this Tom? Is there one rule for some and a blind spot for others? Danny needs to realise that if he is to make a case, it has to be rational, not wild negative propaganda, and slippery false reasoning, regardless of his religion training him this way, it is not an excuse for him to use manipulative twisted reasoning here, hoping no one will perceive it. His veiled deceit and lying conclusions to incorrect points he makes all the time should be outed where seen. I apologise if I was rude as I was angry, knowing how many are sucked in by his religion's members specious and often twisted reasoning, but my points all still stand. Regards, Central. Posted 15 July 2005`
2,005
true
article
blocked
test
false
18,873,424
Central, You apoligized to the wrong person. Anger does not excuse rudeness. That does NOT belong here.
2,005
true
article
blocked
train
false
18,874,013
Hemorroids image == I noticed your revert (perhaps influenced by the user's chosen name). Not really a bad picture for a medicine related article, just rather shockingly placed up front. How about a textual reference this way: Click to see an image of a hemorroid? 8 July 2005 04:46 (UTC) ==
2,005
true
user
blocked
train
false
18,879,603
===No=== Just as I said, no matter what evidence I offer it is never enough to satisfy a troll, LOL Ashida Kim
2,005
true
article
blocked
dev
false
18,888,093
Plus, you have to be a natural born citizen... which I'm going to assume is not. But who cares anyway.
2,005
true
article
blocked
train
false
18,899,360
FYI: Please see this: . If there isn't a comment from me to Central here check the history.
2,005
true
user
blocked
test
false
18,900,805
Summary of Changes to the section === Five editors have expressed their opinion on the section content and length. Here is a summary of the results: Keep as is: :# :# Revise: Shorter descriptions are more appropriate, perhaps a single sentence. Avoid promotional language. We do not need a synopsis of each and every book; A title, author, ISBN #, etc., etc. should be sufficient: :# :# :# Tally: Three to two to revise. The changes have been made. =
2,005
true
article
blocked
train
false
18,901,005
`I cope. Anyway, the mediator doesn't seem to have picked up your ``original research`` accusation and Peter confines his original research accusation to the Royal Style and Titles Act which isn't mentioned in this article. I'm afraid you haven't convinced anyone, not even your ally Peter. Are you willing to drop it? `
2,005
true
article
random
train
false
18,902,280
you need some advice. never, and i mean NEVER, go onto someone's talk page and revert the changes they made to their own talk page. that harassment is as bad as spamming, and is NEVER excusable. DO NOT DO IT EVER AGAIN. understood?
2,005
false
user
blocked
test
true
18,903,652
. Bharat-Varsh means 'Kingdom of Bharat'.
2,005
false
article
blocked
train
false
18,911,031
Really a very small article, compared to all the pioneering work and his contributions to India. The article should surely be:
2,005
true
article
random
test
false
18,913,697
:Sorry, but I'm not actively contributing to Wikipedia at the moment. Sorry about that. —
2,005
true
user
blocked
test
false
18,916,448
Danny, I have reverted your unjustified changes, as there are millions of people out there who have not given an opinion, and you cannot just throw what appears to be a tantrum because you are embittered by an argument with someone else. You alone do not possess the world's views. If someone got two people to agree with them that the entire JW page was to be banned and removed, would you allow this? Obviously not. The opinions of you, and one other, hardly justify or counteract the possible millions of views of others. Sorry, but you need to address your problems with the other poster, before you go removing text, as it looks like you are just being vindictive, which is not a tangible reason to edit anything. Regards, Elenap. 15th of July 2005
2,005
true
article
blocked
train
false
18,920,142
` this artcile has a NPOV problem.... ``nuclear - fossil`` ????? ``radiation can escape`` ?????? ? ?`
2,005
true
article
random
test
false
18,921,681
`It's not that complicated. The extra harmonic power that they are generating is then filtered out, correct? Yes. So the filters are dissipating a lot of heat. No. People design the output filters of class-D amplifiers so they don't dissipate heat. Passive electronic filters are made from 3 types of components: resistors, capacitors, and inductors. In theory, capacitors and inductors do not dissipate *any* heat only the resistors dissipate heat. So, people who design class-D output filters simply don't use any resistors. Only capacitors and inductors. (In practice, real capacitors and inductors have some small amounts of ``parasitic resistance``, so class-D output filters do get slighly warmer than room temperature. Still, the total heat generated by a class-D amplifier and its filter is still far less than any linear amplifier with comparable output power.) (So where does this ``extra harmonic power`` go, if it is not sent out to the speaker or dissipated in the output filter ? It is temporarily stored in the filter, in the capacitors and inductors. At some instants, energy flows *into* the filter, charging the capacitors and ___ing the inductors. At other instants, energy flows ``backwards`` from the filter, through the class-D amplifier, back into the power supply. This is why class-D amplifiers need a lot more/bigger capacitors on their power supply than other classes.) `
2,005
true
article
random
dev
false
18,923,425
` == More on Protocols/Procedures/Courtesy == Hi Bov, Thanks so much for your kind reply. Our discussion was getting so long it was unwieldy to scroll though, so I thought I'd continue under a new heading. Hope you have no objection. I'm still under the gun with that project I mentioned and am amazed that my last note was as long as it is!! Wanted to reply to a few points for the moment...I'm using numbered points because it makes it easier for you (and me) to refer back to. 1. Regardingn my making a clear distinction between me/us and ``your editorial colleagues``, yes, you're right. I guess I don't know enough about WikiP yet, but I clearly don't have access to the same ``additional facilities`` (which I take to mean ``tools``) as you, so I don't have the same control. Sure, I could put a Copyvio on someone's page, but I rather doubt it would stay there any more than my {db}s did I assume Copyvio notices are either 1. sent to all admins (or those who deal with Copyvios specifically), and/or 2. posted to the Copyvio page for you and your colleagues to make some sort of determination on. From what you say above, it appears that some Uber Admin(s) makes the final determination. 2. Also regarding ``tools`` I and, I suspect, most WikiP contributors have no power to Lock and page to insure it doesn't get Reverted by anyone else. Nor can we Delete a page, even our own. Nor do we have access, as I assume you do, to EB and other pay services to check for likely infringements. There are even several services used by educational institutions which faculty regularly use to check for plagiarism in term papers, theses, etc. Perhaps you also have access to those? You didn't indicate how that EB page was accessed since the public can only get the ``teaser`` entry for Crapsey. Thus, to paraphrase your quote and the old axiom: ``we are all peers, with equal power to edit, but some of us are more equal than others!`` 3. Regarding your statement that it's ``actually relatively rare for a copyvio to be contested, and most pass without comment,`` are you saying that once a Copyvio is pointed out, the ``offending contributor`` simply concedes the point and allows the page to be removed without so much an objection?!! That's truly astouonding I'd imagine that most folks do not deliberately borrow from others, however similiar the contents might be. Have no idea what you mean by ``the ones that are contested often end up in the sections at the top of the page.`` Can you point me to a sample of this? 4. Regarding your statement that ``he EB page I'm referring to is , the one originally referenced what do you mean? Referenced by whom? By your colleague? Or are you obliquely saying that WikiP has the means of reading contributor hard drive caches and Recent URL lists to determine where they've been?! I know I didn't reference EB and don't know how you access their pay service, but if you're in fact suggesting that WikiP can somehow monitor member hard drives, I'd find that VERY disturbing...an outright privacy violation. Will run AdAware & Spybot S&D; just to see if anything they regard as ``malicious`` turns up with WikiP fingerprints on it! ;-) 5. On your reply to 3 above that ``Wikipedia does not, in general, use text 'with permission,' `` I'm confused. The passage I quoted suggests that the authors are granting WikiP a GFDL ``license,`` which, from my understanding of the law, means ``with permission.`` The author still ``owns`` the material and, presumably can make whatever other use s/he wants of it but cannot expect payment from WikiP, restrict the editing of, or, for that matter, even withdraw permission for work submitted to WikiP. 6. Regarding your answer to 5 above that you ``don't have access to any special posting info. It's all available to everyone, although some of it is better hidden or harder to use,`` this sort of relates to my #1 immediately above, and I guess I'm confused again. How in the world would Admins and other ``watchers`` like you (still don't know what your title is) know ``what's new`` on WikiP if you don't get notices or have some list you can comb through? Are you saying there's an actual public list of all new articles? If so, where is it, and what prompts you folks to check one article vs. another? Again, thanks. Will try and get back later or tomorrow. `
2,005
false
user
blocked
train
false
18,925,890
Yes, my name is Scooter.
2,005
false
article
blocked
dev
false
18,926,737
` Please do not sign your posts as as that is another editor. Sign your posts using four tildes (~). As even you should be able to see, an account was created by someone who called themself Anonm but they ceased using that name the same day they created it last December! There is no point in using IP addresses since 1000s of people can share an IP. And like thousands of other users, I don't always use the same IP or IP Block and really have no interest in reading your arrogant, insulting comments any more than you have any interest in my ``uncivil`` ones. The only uncivil, rude, unhelpful person in these exchanged has been you. :It doesn't matter that is not an active user. It doesn't matter that your IP address changes from day to day or different users share an IP. I don't particularly care that you have some sort of bizarre grudge against me because you can't be bothered to read this site's rules and follow them. You are not User:Anon. If you continue to sign your posts as another user I will start blocking you for impersonating someone else. No one has any ``bizzare grudge`` against you. You're simply rude and obnoxious the best example of what's WRONG with Wikipedia. Your comments and behavior again reveal you to be a thuggish bully. You clearly have too much time on your hands, and seem to delight in playing the petty bureaucrat, the ENFORCER OF THE RULES. Should you continue this sort of harrassment, you may well find yourself blocked or removed from WikiP. But, by all means, proceed with your threat, which I guess mean blocking IP blocks!! that will document your bizarre, unprofessional behavior. There IS NO User Anon; one can't ``impersonate`` an non-existent User I'm as much User Anon you are or as I am IP xxxx. Think you can get that straight? `
2,005
false
user
blocked
train
false
18,928,747
` ::Wrong again. So far you have only based your claim on a web site. Iranica does NOT say that Aryanem Vaejo is in Afghanistan, nor does Iranica say that any part of Afghanistan has ever been called Ariana. If it does, paste the EXACT quote here WITH A LINK to that article. The association of Afghanistan and ``Ariana`` for the FIRST TIME IN HISTORY appeared after World War II and this includes the name for their airlines ``Ariana Airlines``. You seem to be of the mindset that no matter what, nobody should change what you put in the articles. This is indicative of poor upbringing by your parents. Your parents have produced a foolish Mr. Know It All who is not smart enough to distinguish between the real world and the our-son-is-never-wrong environment of his mommy's house. This is stupid. I have offered plenty of serious and verifiable examples that shows what you are forcefully injecting in this article is wrong, but it seems that you are only interested in a stupid and stubborn childish game of just winning an argument at any cost, no matter what the truth is. Tell me which of the following points is wrong: :::1- No reputable scholar has ever claimed that Aryanem Vajo is in Afghanistan. :::2- One scholar, the late Professor Bahram Farahvashi, who dedicated his life to Iranian studies and has several respectable publications, including his award winning Dictionary of Pahlavi Language, has a book by the title of ``Iran Vij`` which is precisely about Aryanem Vaejo which Zereshk claims to be Afghanistan. According to this book, as well as other scholars, Aryanem Vaejo is next to the Caspian Sea. Farahvashi also mentions the names of the scholars who think (and gives their reasons as to why they think) that Aryanem Vaejo is next to the Aral Sea. In no case anybody has suggested it is in Afghanistan. :::3- In at least three of the Achaemenids inscriptions (by Darius I and his son Xerxes) where they mention the word Arya (that is, the Old Persian word Arya) in the SAME INSCRIPTION they also mention Haraiva (modern day Herat which was recorded as ``Aria`` in Greek texts) as one of the provices under their rule. The two words are DISTINCLY DIFFERENT words with different spellings. Only due to the Greek rendering of Haraiva as Aria this confusion exists today (and even then, it surfaces after World War II, because someone found a way to associate Afghanistan with ``Aryan`` and others picked it up.) :::4- Unlike what Zereshk claims, Encyclopedia Iranica DOES NOT say that Afghanistan is the same as Aryanem Vaejo nor does it anywhere say that Afghanistan has EVER been called ``Ariana``. :::5- Show me one authentic source from BEFORE WORLD WAR II, that shows any part of Afghanistan has ever been called ``Ariana`` or ``Aryana``. Just one source would be enough, but it has to be an authentic and academically acceptable source, such a book from antiquity or the like, and NOT afghani web sites from the 21st century. By repeating that the ``official afghanis website says so`` you only show how weak your argument is. :::5- Last but not least, in your revert message you offered the reason [this is] ``the OFFICIAL POSITION of The Islamic Republic of Afghanistan`` well, that is not good enough. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia not the official website of Afghanistan. What ``the OFFICIAL POSITION of The Islamic Republic of Afghanistan`` is irrelevant here. We are interested in correct information. `
2,005
true
article
blocked
train
false
18,928,792
== Other algorithms == I've been looking around on the wikipedia and it seems that there are many algorithms that are left off this list (e.g. Levenshtein_distance, Longest-common subsequence problem). Has this page been deprecated by categories? (I still see value in this page as it adds short blurbs about the algorithms.) I'm asking because I'd like to add some of these, but I'm not sure where to put them without adding new sections (it seems a similar thing was discussed earlier). Ok, thanks!
2,005
true
article
random
test
false
18,929,378
I'm not sure why you have added Metanarrative here, it doesn't seem very relevant to the topic. Also, it is incorrect to assume that either Metanarrative or Postmodernism are inherently left-wing.
2,005
true
article
random
dev
false
18,929,382
` OK Zereshk, thank you very much for suggesting that we should read the ``Aria`` entry of Iranics. I paste your own EXACT link here ``(look up ``Aria``)`` please everybody, read his own link. Look up Aria and in there it clearly says: ``ARIA, name of a region in the eastern part of the Persian Empire, several times confused with Ariane in the classic sources`` and it also explains more in two sub-items about this confusion. `
2,005
true
article
blocked
train
false
18,929,997
`And it basically says what I have been saying all along that simply this ``Aria`` is a greek/latin rendering of ``Haraiva``. `
2,005
true
article
blocked
train
false
18,930,756
It's my first time on this page. I'd like to express my support for MrSandman's (and Wiki's) position on rejecting misinformation. While it is true that science cannot yet provide answers to some questions, and that we can find and merge many scientifically unestablished theories to try to explain events to our liking and answer those questions, those answers do not belong here. There are probably other discussion boards and online communities to discuss them.
2,005
false
article
blocked
train
false
18,931,096
, most probably via a google search
2,005
true
article
blocked
train
false
18,933,835
` == I Apologize == I've been having a bad few days, some really bad stuff has been happening to me lately. So I'm sorry for personally attacking me. But will you please stop featuring me as a ``troll`` as you call it. I know what I did was wrong but I don't deserve to be belittled like that. I know that you told El C to block me, but I'm okay with it because like I said, I was being a loser. But also I've been having a few bad days, just so you know. `
2,005
true
user
blocked
train
false
18,935,014
:::: What you say is true (to the extent that I can judge) of general one-electron wavefunctions, but it is my understanding that non-eigen wavefunctions are not considered orbitals.
2,005
true
article
random
train
false
18,935,791
===Still A Troll=== Just gotta have the last word, eh? More proof of trolldom. Ashida Kim
2,005
true
article
random
train
true
18,935,871
` I didn't say nothing about leaving. I don't see you ``verifying`` anything. Just more YAPPING!`
2,005
true
article
blocked
test
true
18,936,359
I know my bothering again is probably unwelcome but thanks for saying that about me. So I have to say, some of you communists are alright. Okay well thanks again, and bye.
2,005
true
user
blocked
train
false
18,936,507
`Okay thanks for fixing the troll stuff that I have looked at. Also I want to ask...``He has since apologized. I was actually impressed by his apology``, why were you impressed I'm just wondering? `
2,005
true
user
blocked
dev
false
18,936,662
`===Ashida Kim=== Fire Star, looks like the trolls are at work all over now, eh? Hate to bother you again with my little war but as you can see the Discussion thread toward the end is totally cluttered by this Sam Brown jerk. Even though I have made him and the others look like a fools, I'd just as soon not have all that trash online at all. At the very least block Sam Brown so I don't have to keep playing ``last word`` with him, LOL Spoke with Howabout1 a few days ago and he was kind enough to re-word some of the entry on me to make it less of a slam job. Would ask one other favor in that regard. Please remove the names given as aliases. First of all, they are not aliases, they are friends of mine, some of whom have already started getting harassing phone calls because the trolls know how to track down a name and have the area in which to look thanks to the details given. I compare this to the current ``outing of Valerie Plame`` in the news media. Revealing what the trolls believe to be my ``real names`` just encourages stalkers like the one I indicated above. Not to mention other people with the same names who might be targeted inadvertently. You might not think there is much danger from these miscreants, but, at the very least, the flame war with them on the discussion page clearly shows how rabid and dedicated they are to my destruction. Please consider this, thanks. Ashida Kim `
2,005
true
user
blocked
train
false
18,937,057
== A better intro == How about telling more about what the show is about? Saying who owns it isn't that descriptive of an intro, and I actually got to this page wanting to know why these little people are fighting and such.
2,005
false
article
blocked
train
false
18,938,076
2005 (UTC) ::I'm adding the pronunciation: [] (not with [] as in Nazi). 04:35, 16 July
2,005
true
article
random
dev
false
18,938,097
Oh and also I was reading stuff about me in your talk thing and by the way I'm a he, not a she, just so you know.
2,005
true
user
blocked
train
false
18,938,543
` ::I raised 6 points, of which you did not answer any. And in your item 1 above you say ``nobody cares what Aryanem Vaejo is``!! I guess you forgot that this was your first cliam (it's still on this page!). You wrote: ``The Latinized term Ariana...is based upon Old Iranian Aryana- (Avestan Airiiana-, esp. in Airiianem vaejo, the name of the Iranians' mother country...)``. I also copied the EXACT statement from Encyclopedia Iranica from THE VERY ARTICLE which you yourself were using to support your baseless claim, and now you are pretending as if nothing happened, and you are back to your long list of meaningless google-searched mostly-afghani obscure and/or personal web sites. I will not bother to retype my 6 points above. They are legit and every observer can see them. Asnwer the points. Encyclopedia Iranica is more authentic than some personal web site from an afghan guy who somewho is happy to believe that Afghanistan = Ariana. `
2,005
true
article
blocked
train
false
18,938,895
SlimVirgin, show me the racial insult that I have used to shut up. And MAKE SURE you know what the hell you are talking about next time.
2,005
true
user
blocked
train
true
18,942,706
YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE! YOU FUCKING KIKE! DON'T EDIT THINGS YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT'S DUE!
2,005
false
user
blocked
dev
true
18,943,239
FUCK YOU, YOU FUCKING DIRTY KIKE. YOU SUPPORT THOSE WHO VANDALIZE PAGES, NOW IT IS TURNED ON YOU
2,005
false
user
blocked
train
true
18,943,414
LISTEN UP WIKI-KIKES, Burn this IP, it means nothing. I have 1000's more. You support those who vandalize and rewrite entire articles that they know nothing about and are not NPOV. You shall suffer for this. - holy6vfds
2,005
false
user
blocked
dev
true
18,945,612
, or else I'll cure your virginity from the wrong hole
2,005
true
user
blocked
train
true
18,946,187
` ::hehe, you *ARE* truly pathetic Zereshk, as I have pointed out to you before. You know damn well that the term ``racism`` or ``racist comment`` doesn not apply in Iran in the same way that it applies in countries with true racist history, such as USA and many European countries. The fact that you are using your familiarity with the English language to get a cheap ``winning point`` out of a lost game, tells us how weak and pathetic you are. In absolutely BEST of circumstances, you can associate ``turk`` in Persian slang with ``ethnicity`` but if you really grew up in Iran as you claim you did, you know damn well what it is. And especially ``torke tablo``, which you are. Given your pathetic edit history of ``all image and no substance`` I repeat, I is hard to imagine a lower and less self-respecting Iranian than you. You were born to be wannabee-western and as such, Iranians like you deserve to be jew-slaves. `
2,005
true
user
blocked
dev
true
18,948,810
` ::Genius, when someone chooses an ID like ``SlimVirgin`` he/she is BEGGING for attention and comments like that. You are so bright you almost qualify to move to the White House. `
2,005
true
user
blocked
test
true
18,951,242
` Ah. Sorry about that, just that your user page is a red link, and I found ``damn hurry up`` or something in your edit - but that came from someone else after further investigation. `
2,005
true
user
random
train
false
18,951,809
vandalism. Right, that's it. You're banned. | Talk 16 July 2005 09:26 (UTC)
2,005
false
user
blocked
dev
false
18,957,555
`Hi. I'm from the Willamette congregation Eugene, OR. Sorry don't know any McGhee's in California. I like your ``Opposition`` idea. Cheers, Matt M. ) `
2,005
true
user
blocked
train
false
18,961,460
==Wikipedia:Mind Benders== Hello! I've noticed your past interest in Wikipedia:Mind Benders and wanted to let you know that round one is now officially open! Consisting of ten challenging, puzzling questions, it is sure to be tons of WikiFun! In addition, take a look at all 9 of our great artistic entries and vote for one of them! Hope to see you there! | |
2,005
true
user
random
dev
false
18,980,760
Evita was not invovled in helping Nazis escape justice. Juan Peron did that. Evita herself was not involved. And she was not a supporter of Mussolini or Hitler. Here is an article you should read, by an Argentine scholar who actually knows Argentine history: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/1997/int/970120/cinema.the_woman.html
2,005
false
article
random
train
false
18,985,431
` ::You really are astonishingly stupid AND STUBBORN. Moron, the four cities above are just 4 of many many many cities and villages in the HUGE province of the [Old] Khorasan. And unlike what you think of the above four none is in Iran; and Merv and Bukhara are not in Afghanistan. What the hell is the point of mentioning only 4 cities out of scores cities? Modern Afghanistan is not any more or less ``khorasan`` than modern Iran or modern Uzbekistan or parts of modern Turkmenistan is. You clearly have no grasp on this subject. What can we expect from a Turkic mutt who thinks ``Fravahr=Ahura Mazda`` and thinks ``Aryana=Afghanistan`` and thinks ``Khorasan=Afghanistan``? I honestly wish I had your brain .... I would feed it to my plants. I am done with you, you are a complete waste of time. Go ahead and put whatever bullshit you wish in the article and be happy that ``you won`` cuz your only aim seems to be just winning the argument at any cost, regardless of the facts, and that level of ``intelligence`` is more than I can handle. If you had even a modicum of a brain, I would have attempted to teach you what yeki bar sare shakh bon miborid means.`
2,005
false
article
blocked
test
true
18,994,671
== Have we ever considered search-based page links? == Just floating the idea of small boxes on the side of articles listing cross-references by other articles. This would be an interesting way to direct readers through the encyclopedia. This kind of feature could be created automatically by search engines, kind of like how Amazon.com suggests other articles you may be interested in, but with less privacy concerns.
2,005
false
article
random
train
false
19,004,676
::::::I'm inclined to agree (with Brian0918). We can state something as fact so long as there is no serious dispute. There is no serious dispute over whether creation science is pseudoscience. No matter how much creationists would like to say there is.
2,005
true
article
random
train
false
19,008,005
- nothing wrong with being a fag
2,005
false
user
blocked
dev
true
19,016,483
To whom it may concern, it's true we haven't heard from all 6.whatever billion people on earth, nor do we need to. WP doesn't work that way, nor was it meant to. We have however heard from those WP editors that are interested in this issue. The result is a consensus of the majority regarding what this section should contain. That being said, personal attacks are inappropriate on WP and are certainly not persuasive or logical. I don't respond well to bullying or taunts. Enough said.
2,005
true
article
blocked
train
false
19,017,226
==JW Pages== Please stop your personal insults. If you cannot work cooperatively, then you do not belong here.
2,005
true
user
blocked
test
false
19,030,735
`::Dearest Danny, I see you have not replied to any of the points put forward in my criticism of your obsessive use of propaganda, unfounded accusations, slander, and your ad hominem attacks to name but a few of your methods. I herby challenge you to take three different examples from either of Raymond Franz's two books, and prove to us using evidence contained in the books that he is ``a bitter apostate, vindictive liar, makes inaccurate claims, and writes incorrect material about JWs, or the Watch Tower's Governing Body`` as you claim. If you cannot do this, then you should permanently remove yourself, and be barred from Wikipedia, as you have demonstrated, hypocrisy, slander and defamation of character, negative grossly subjective propaganda and multiple lies, all of which discredit your character, and your editing scruples as virtually worthless, and indubitably of no value as a contributor to Wikipedia, as you have proven over and over that you feel content to destroy someone's character (Franz's in this case), his motives, his books, and all without reading a single page of his written material. If someone did the same about Jehovah's Witnesses books, you would be outraged, disgusted, and we would never hear the end to it, you definitely would not stand for it. You would also have utmost contempt for someone who makes up lies, false accusations, and slander about JWs and their books, especially if they had never even read a single JW publication and yet they posted masses of negative claims about them, just like you have about Raymond Franz. YOU Danny Muse, are in NO position to speak, as you have not even read a single book by Raymond Franz, and so have completely and permanently revoked your right to speak, edit, or comment on the matter, of which you have admitted ZERO knowledge about him, his motives, his life or about his books and their Wikepedia entries, which you have the audacity to claim are ``inaccurate``, and yet you have zero basis for this false claim, but you still cling to it like a rabid Pit bull. Give it up Danny; you are biting at your own air filled fantasies and straw men. Wishing you well, and I hope you come back down to reality soon. Kind regards Central. Posted 17 July 2005 (PS, I will pray for you, and I really mean it) `
2,005
true
article
blocked
test
false
19,033,427
`So editing other people's messages sent to them isn't ``personal attacks``? The admins here seem to like ganging up on people that threaten their little personal cliques`
2,005
false
user
blocked
train
false
19,033,526
` It's a joke that you blocked me for ``personal attacks`` when all I did was edit your talk page - the same as you did mine. Maybe you should think about if you'd like someone doing it to you first beforehand, or would that need you to actually step off your ``I'm a god because I'm an admin`` pedestal? Oh well, at least the internet is the only place freaks like you have power, the rest of us can deal with the real world...`
2,005
false
user
blocked
train
true
19,046,431
-kelly this is yo momma speaking, please stop being a nerd.-
2,005
false
user
blocked
train
true
19,048,069
I like your suggestion. Let's try it and see how it flies!
2,005
true
article
blocked
test
false
19,048,210
, Welcome to Wikipedia,
2,005
true
article
blocked
dev
false
19,057,580
`::Dude! What are you talking about ``poorly written``? Why you always tryin' to keep a brotha down? But thanks for understanding, my man... I mean, there's no need to have a century-old article cut and pasted here and passing for current scholarship with no attribution. And yeah, its me, Musachachado. I had to use this account for my other one seems to be blocked right now for whatever reason. `
2,005
true
article
blocked
test
false
19,060,641
` To all Wikipedia Editors of the Jehovah's Witnesses pages: FOR THE RECORD: I have chosen to not respond directly to Central's continued personal attacks on myself as that is quite obviously a pointless exercise in futility. Nevertheless, I felt an explanation might be in order for anyone else contributing to these pages. As Central is fond of pointing out ad hominem arguments are generally a logical fallacy. By the same reasoning anything he says about me is quite frankly irrelevant to the real issue, which is what should be included in the Critical of the Group section. This has been discussed at length above. And, although we clearly we're not able to reach a unanimous agreement on the content, we did attain a majority consensus from those of the current contributors to this page that cared to express an opinion regarding what this section should and should not contain. Anyone that is curious can read the above thread whichas has observedis ``quite prolonged``. That being said, I welcome any and all reasonable dialogue on the subject. But as long as Central continues his personal attacks on my character I will continue to undo his reverts without further comment. `
2,005
true
article
blocked
dev
false
19,061,451
`) :¹ - As an example, Central wrote: ``'I was insulting you just for pleasure, not because it proves you wrong' ... Posted Central 7 July 2005`` (see above this section`
2,005
true
article
blocked
train
false
19,061,681
` :Sounds good, Tony. You might want to put Talk:Terri Schiavo/Mediation on your watchlist too, as this seems to be where the most recent discussion is taking place. `
2,005
true
user
random
train
false
19,062,504
== Vandalism on my talk page == Hi, just wanted to thank you for reverting vandalism on my talk page! It seems these things only happen when I go on a miniWikiBreak.
2,005
true
user
random
test
false
19,064,699
Welcome to Wikipedia! I look forward to your contributions to the work. As a new user you may find the following References & Useful Links to be helpful: * Tutorial * Policies and Guidelines. * Wikipedia:Neutral point of view * Manual of Style * Help - Reference material * Help Desk - Post a question Happy editing!
2,005
true
user
blocked
train
false
19,065,349
* Wikipedia:Guide to writing better articles
2,005
true
user
blocked
test
false
19,065,480
Wikipedia:How to write a great article :* Wikipedia:The perfect article
2,005
true
user
blocked
train
false
19,070,010
The economics section is woefully pessimistic. Tasmania has been booming for the last three to four years. Tourism is booming, property market is building and labour shortages are commonplace throughout the state.
2,005
false
article
blocked
test
false
19,070,682
I have rewritten some of the economics section and thrown out a lot of the pessimistic, unsubstantiated garbage. - Bella July 2005
2,005
false
article
blocked
test
false
19,073,911
` == Proposed move == Is the proposal to move the page to ``Reactionsim`` still current. If so, where can you vote on this. I can't find it on Wikipedia:Requested moves. `
2,005
true
article
random
train
false
19,088,616
While I do think that book is very important, it deals only with scholars of American Communism and quite negatively (if accurately). Intellectuals, especially academics, do play an important role in maintaining enthusiasm for communist ideology. Support for the ideology from that quarter should be part of the article as should support from those elements of the working class, European unions, for example, which continue to form the bulk of the movement.
2,005
true
article
random
train
false
19,103,678
Please no Wiki-Weirdo posts !
2,005
true
user
blocked
train
false
19,105,420
Thankyou-I'm most interested in this .
2,005
true
article
random
test
false
19,109,698
== Maimonides and the Aleppo Codex == It's quite clear if you read the text of his Code of Law - I'll add a citation in the next few days.
2,005
true
user
random
train
false
19,112,455
Thank you, too, for reverting vandalism on my user page. Unfortunately, my page has become a recent target as a result of spotting and cleaning vandalism on other pages. Unfortunately, that wasn't me this time, , did that. But I have now added your page to my watchlist, so if it happens in the future, I will try to catch it. Salut.
2,005
true
user
random
test
false
19,117,256
==Pictures== I like the picture Image:Ff8 butterflypicture.jpg that you uploaded, but you deleted an image I uploaded when you uploaded your version of Image:Irvine Kinneas shot.jpg. I reverted this change, because you had created a duplicate, with lesser resolution of Image:Irvine Kinneas profile.jpg, which was already on the page. In the future check out what you are overwritting.
2,005
true
user
random
train
false
19,147,052
and offer you sexual favours.
2,005
false
user
blocked
train
false
19,152,723
` :I got one of these congratulatory notices too. Isn't it thrilling? (For one thing, I hadn't even realized I was in North America.) I'm asking Spot to pay me €50 for artistic services rendered to this ``peice`` (sic); how about you? `
2,005
true
user
random
test
false
19,161,315
Does it make sense to mention Petit Jean Mountain as a link, seeing as how that just redirects back to Petit Jean State Park?
2,005
true
article
random
train
false