messages
listlengths 4
4
|
|---|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "As early as 1070, Adam von Bremen referred to Roskilde as \"Zealands largest town\". At the time of the Reformation in 1536, it had some 6,000 inhabitants but as a result of war, fire and disease, by 1753 its population had dropped to only 1,550. By the 1860s, it had grown to around 5,000 and by the 1900s to some 9,000. Thereafter it increased appreciably until 1970 when there were almost 45,000 inhabitants. The population dipped slightly to 40,000 in the 1980s, but thanks to improved connections with Copenhagen and the establishment of the university, it grew steadily to reach 47,117 by 2014 making Roskilde Denmarks tenth largest city."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which year in Roskilde had the largest total of inhabitants, 1970 or 2014?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "2014"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "As early as 1070, Adam von Bremen referred to Roskilde as \"Zealands largest town\". At the time of the Reformation in 1536, it had some 6,000 inhabitants but as a result of war, fire and disease, by 1753 its population had dropped to only 1,550. By the 1860s, it had grown to around 5,000 and by the 1900s to some 9,000. Thereafter it increased appreciably until 1970 when there were almost 45,000 inhabitants. The population dipped slightly to 40,000 in the 1980s, but thanks to improved connections with Copenhagen and the establishment of the university, it grew steadily to reach 47,117 by 2014 making Roskilde Denmarks tenth largest city."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which year in Roskilde had the least number of inhabitants,1753 or 1536?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "1753"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "As early as 1070, Adam von Bremen referred to Roskilde as \"Zealands largest town\". At the time of the Reformation in 1536, it had some 6,000 inhabitants but as a result of war, fire and disease, by 1753 its population had dropped to only 1,550. By the 1860s, it had grown to around 5,000 and by the 1900s to some 9,000. Thereafter it increased appreciably until 1970 when there were almost 45,000 inhabitants. The population dipped slightly to 40,000 in the 1980s, but thanks to improved connections with Copenhagen and the establishment of the university, it grew steadily to reach 47,117 by 2014 making Roskilde Denmarks tenth largest city."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many inhabitants did Rockilde have in 1753 after dropping from fire, war and disease?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "4450"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "It is believed that the Baltic languages are among the most archaic of the currently remaining Indo-European languages, despite their late attestation. Although the various Baltic tribes were mentioned by ancient historians as early as 98 B.C., the first attestation of a Baltic language was about 1350, with the creation of the Elbing Prussian Vocabulary, a German to Prussian translation dictionary. Lithuanian was first attested in a hymnal translation in 1545; the first printed book in Lithuanian, a Catechism by Martynas Mažvydas was published in 1547 in Königsberg, Prussia . Latvian appeared in a hymnal in 1530 and in a printed Catechism in 1585. One reason for the late attestation is that the Baltic peoples resisted Christianization longer than any other Europeans, which delayed the introduction of writing and isolated their languages from outside influence. With the establishment of a German state in Prussia, and the eradication or flight of much of the Baltic Prussian population in the 13th century, the remaining Prussians began to be assimilated, and by the end of the 17th century, the Prussian language had become extinct. During the years of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth , official documents were written in Polish, Ruthenian and Latin. After the Partitions of Commonwealth, most of the Baltic lands were under the rule of the Russian Empire, where the native languages or alphabets were sometimes prohibited from being written down or used publicly in a Russification effort ."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The first translated document into a Baltic language was published when?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "1545"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "It is believed that the Baltic languages are among the most archaic of the currently remaining Indo-European languages, despite their late attestation. Although the various Baltic tribes were mentioned by ancient historians as early as 98 B.C., the first attestation of a Baltic language was about 1350, with the creation of the Elbing Prussian Vocabulary, a German to Prussian translation dictionary. Lithuanian was first attested in a hymnal translation in 1545; the first printed book in Lithuanian, a Catechism by Martynas Mažvydas was published in 1547 in Königsberg, Prussia . Latvian appeared in a hymnal in 1530 and in a printed Catechism in 1585. One reason for the late attestation is that the Baltic peoples resisted Christianization longer than any other Europeans, which delayed the introduction of writing and isolated their languages from outside influence. With the establishment of a German state in Prussia, and the eradication or flight of much of the Baltic Prussian population in the 13th century, the remaining Prussians began to be assimilated, and by the end of the 17th century, the Prussian language had become extinct. During the years of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth , official documents were written in Polish, Ruthenian and Latin. After the Partitions of Commonwealth, most of the Baltic lands were under the rule of the Russian Empire, where the native languages or alphabets were sometimes prohibited from being written down or used publicly in a Russification effort ."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which language was first attested, the Baltic language or Lithuanian?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Baltic language"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "It is believed that the Baltic languages are among the most archaic of the currently remaining Indo-European languages, despite their late attestation. Although the various Baltic tribes were mentioned by ancient historians as early as 98 B.C., the first attestation of a Baltic language was about 1350, with the creation of the Elbing Prussian Vocabulary, a German to Prussian translation dictionary. Lithuanian was first attested in a hymnal translation in 1545; the first printed book in Lithuanian, a Catechism by Martynas Mažvydas was published in 1547 in Königsberg, Prussia . Latvian appeared in a hymnal in 1530 and in a printed Catechism in 1585. One reason for the late attestation is that the Baltic peoples resisted Christianization longer than any other Europeans, which delayed the introduction of writing and isolated their languages from outside influence. With the establishment of a German state in Prussia, and the eradication or flight of much of the Baltic Prussian population in the 13th century, the remaining Prussians began to be assimilated, and by the end of the 17th century, the Prussian language had become extinct. During the years of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth , official documents were written in Polish, Ruthenian and Latin. After the Partitions of Commonwealth, most of the Baltic lands were under the rule of the Russian Empire, where the native languages or alphabets were sometimes prohibited from being written down or used publicly in a Russification effort ."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many years after Latvian appeared in a hymnal was it printed in a Catechism?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "55"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "It is believed that the Baltic languages are among the most archaic of the currently remaining Indo-European languages, despite their late attestation. Although the various Baltic tribes were mentioned by ancient historians as early as 98 B.C., the first attestation of a Baltic language was about 1350, with the creation of the Elbing Prussian Vocabulary, a German to Prussian translation dictionary. Lithuanian was first attested in a hymnal translation in 1545; the first printed book in Lithuanian, a Catechism by Martynas Mažvydas was published in 1547 in Königsberg, Prussia . Latvian appeared in a hymnal in 1530 and in a printed Catechism in 1585. One reason for the late attestation is that the Baltic peoples resisted Christianization longer than any other Europeans, which delayed the introduction of writing and isolated their languages from outside influence. With the establishment of a German state in Prussia, and the eradication or flight of much of the Baltic Prussian population in the 13th century, the remaining Prussians began to be assimilated, and by the end of the 17th century, the Prussian language had become extinct. During the years of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth , official documents were written in Polish, Ruthenian and Latin. After the Partitions of Commonwealth, most of the Baltic lands were under the rule of the Russian Empire, where the native languages or alphabets were sometimes prohibited from being written down or used publicly in a Russification effort ."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many centuries after the establishment of a German state in Prussia the flight of much of the Baltic Prussian population"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "4"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "It is believed that the Baltic languages are among the most archaic of the currently remaining Indo-European languages, despite their late attestation. Although the various Baltic tribes were mentioned by ancient historians as early as 98 B.C., the first attestation of a Baltic language was about 1350, with the creation of the Elbing Prussian Vocabulary, a German to Prussian translation dictionary. Lithuanian was first attested in a hymnal translation in 1545; the first printed book in Lithuanian, a Catechism by Martynas Mažvydas was published in 1547 in Königsberg, Prussia . Latvian appeared in a hymnal in 1530 and in a printed Catechism in 1585. One reason for the late attestation is that the Baltic peoples resisted Christianization longer than any other Europeans, which delayed the introduction of writing and isolated their languages from outside influence. With the establishment of a German state in Prussia, and the eradication or flight of much of the Baltic Prussian population in the 13th century, the remaining Prussians began to be assimilated, and by the end of the 17th century, the Prussian language had become extinct. During the years of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth , official documents were written in Polish, Ruthenian and Latin. After the Partitions of Commonwealth, most of the Baltic lands were under the rule of the Russian Empire, where the native languages or alphabets were sometimes prohibited from being written down or used publicly in a Russification effort ."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many years after the first attestation of a Baltic language, was Lithuanian first attested?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "195"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "It is believed that the Baltic languages are among the most archaic of the currently remaining Indo-European languages, despite their late attestation. Although the various Baltic tribes were mentioned by ancient historians as early as 98 B.C., the first attestation of a Baltic language was about 1350, with the creation of the Elbing Prussian Vocabulary, a German to Prussian translation dictionary. Lithuanian was first attested in a hymnal translation in 1545; the first printed book in Lithuanian, a Catechism by Martynas Mažvydas was published in 1547 in Königsberg, Prussia . Latvian appeared in a hymnal in 1530 and in a printed Catechism in 1585. One reason for the late attestation is that the Baltic peoples resisted Christianization longer than any other Europeans, which delayed the introduction of writing and isolated their languages from outside influence. With the establishment of a German state in Prussia, and the eradication or flight of much of the Baltic Prussian population in the 13th century, the remaining Prussians began to be assimilated, and by the end of the 17th century, the Prussian language had become extinct. During the years of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth , official documents were written in Polish, Ruthenian and Latin. After the Partitions of Commonwealth, most of the Baltic lands were under the rule of the Russian Empire, where the native languages or alphabets were sometimes prohibited from being written down or used publicly in a Russification effort ."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many years after Lithuanian was first attested in a hymnal translation was the first print book in Lithuanian published?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "2"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "It is believed that the Baltic languages are among the most archaic of the currently remaining Indo-European languages, despite their late attestation. Although the various Baltic tribes were mentioned by ancient historians as early as 98 B.C., the first attestation of a Baltic language was about 1350, with the creation of the Elbing Prussian Vocabulary, a German to Prussian translation dictionary. Lithuanian was first attested in a hymnal translation in 1545; the first printed book in Lithuanian, a Catechism by Martynas Mažvydas was published in 1547 in Königsberg, Prussia . Latvian appeared in a hymnal in 1530 and in a printed Catechism in 1585. One reason for the late attestation is that the Baltic peoples resisted Christianization longer than any other Europeans, which delayed the introduction of writing and isolated their languages from outside influence. With the establishment of a German state in Prussia, and the eradication or flight of much of the Baltic Prussian population in the 13th century, the remaining Prussians began to be assimilated, and by the end of the 17th century, the Prussian language had become extinct. During the years of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth , official documents were written in Polish, Ruthenian and Latin. After the Partitions of Commonwealth, most of the Baltic lands were under the rule of the Russian Empire, where the native languages or alphabets were sometimes prohibited from being written down or used publicly in a Russification effort ."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which did the Latvian appear in second, a hymnal or in a printed Catechism?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Catechism"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "2012 Baltimore Ravens seasonThe Texans had little time to think about the disappointing results the week before at home against Green Bay, as the Baltimore Ravens, the team who had eliminated them in the divisional round of the playoffs the previous year, were coming to town. The Texans rebounded from their worst performance of the year with arguably one of their best as they had limited Baltimore's revitalized offense to just 13, forcing two turnovers in an impressive win going into the bye week. It was the first time the Texans had ever defeated the Ravens in their franchise history (they had lost the previous six meetings, including the playoff matchup). Reliant Stadium set a new Texans home attendance record of 71,708 fans during the regular season. Likewise, the Ravens and Texans were the only 2 teams in the AFC who were above .500 at the point of this game. However, the Texans surprisingly won it as the team went into their bye week at 6-1 and also went 1-6 all-time against the Ravens. The Texans punted to the Ravens who kicked a field goal to take a 3-0 lead. 3 drives later, Joe Flacco was sacked in his own endzone. That gave Houston 2 points and the ball. It was 3-2. Matt Schuab found Kevin Walters to make it 9-3 at the end of the first. Then Flacco was picked off at the Houston 48. Jonathan Joseph ran it back 52 yards for a touchdown to make it 16-3. On the next drive, Schuab found Owen Daniels to make it 23-3. Randy Bullock kicked 2 field goals to make it 29-3 at the half. Flacco found Tandon Doss to make it 29-10. Then Arian Foster scored to make it 36-10. Justin Tucker kicked a field goal to make it 36-13. Then Arian Foster ran in for the final score of the game making it 43-13."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many points in total were scored in the first half?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "12"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "2012 Baltimore Ravens seasonThe Texans had little time to think about the disappointing results the week before at home against Green Bay, as the Baltimore Ravens, the team who had eliminated them in the divisional round of the playoffs the previous year, were coming to town. The Texans rebounded from their worst performance of the year with arguably one of their best as they had limited Baltimore's revitalized offense to just 13, forcing two turnovers in an impressive win going into the bye week. It was the first time the Texans had ever defeated the Ravens in their franchise history (they had lost the previous six meetings, including the playoff matchup). Reliant Stadium set a new Texans home attendance record of 71,708 fans during the regular season. Likewise, the Ravens and Texans were the only 2 teams in the AFC who were above .500 at the point of this game. However, the Texans surprisingly won it as the team went into their bye week at 6-1 and also went 1-6 all-time against the Ravens. The Texans punted to the Ravens who kicked a field goal to take a 3-0 lead. 3 drives later, Joe Flacco was sacked in his own endzone. That gave Houston 2 points and the ball. It was 3-2. Matt Schuab found Kevin Walters to make it 9-3 at the end of the first. Then Flacco was picked off at the Houston 48. Jonathan Joseph ran it back 52 yards for a touchdown to make it 16-3. On the next drive, Schuab found Owen Daniels to make it 23-3. Randy Bullock kicked 2 field goals to make it 29-3 at the half. Flacco found Tandon Doss to make it 29-10. Then Arian Foster scored to make it 36-10. Justin Tucker kicked a field goal to make it 36-13. Then Arian Foster ran in for the final score of the game making it 43-13."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many rushing touchdowns did Arian foster have in the game?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "2"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "2012 Baltimore Ravens seasonThe Texans had little time to think about the disappointing results the week before at home against Green Bay, as the Baltimore Ravens, the team who had eliminated them in the divisional round of the playoffs the previous year, were coming to town. The Texans rebounded from their worst performance of the year with arguably one of their best as they had limited Baltimore's revitalized offense to just 13, forcing two turnovers in an impressive win going into the bye week. It was the first time the Texans had ever defeated the Ravens in their franchise history (they had lost the previous six meetings, including the playoff matchup). Reliant Stadium set a new Texans home attendance record of 71,708 fans during the regular season. Likewise, the Ravens and Texans were the only 2 teams in the AFC who were above .500 at the point of this game. However, the Texans surprisingly won it as the team went into their bye week at 6-1 and also went 1-6 all-time against the Ravens. The Texans punted to the Ravens who kicked a field goal to take a 3-0 lead. 3 drives later, Joe Flacco was sacked in his own endzone. That gave Houston 2 points and the ball. It was 3-2. Matt Schuab found Kevin Walters to make it 9-3 at the end of the first. Then Flacco was picked off at the Houston 48. Jonathan Joseph ran it back 52 yards for a touchdown to make it 16-3. On the next drive, Schuab found Owen Daniels to make it 23-3. Randy Bullock kicked 2 field goals to make it 29-3 at the half. Flacco found Tandon Doss to make it 29-10. Then Arian Foster scored to make it 36-10. Justin Tucker kicked a field goal to make it 36-13. Then Arian Foster ran in for the final score of the game making it 43-13."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many total points were scored in the game?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "56"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "2012 Baltimore Ravens seasonThe Texans had little time to think about the disappointing results the week before at home against Green Bay, as the Baltimore Ravens, the team who had eliminated them in the divisional round of the playoffs the previous year, were coming to town. The Texans rebounded from their worst performance of the year with arguably one of their best as they had limited Baltimore's revitalized offense to just 13, forcing two turnovers in an impressive win going into the bye week. It was the first time the Texans had ever defeated the Ravens in their franchise history (they had lost the previous six meetings, including the playoff matchup). Reliant Stadium set a new Texans home attendance record of 71,708 fans during the regular season. Likewise, the Ravens and Texans were the only 2 teams in the AFC who were above .500 at the point of this game. However, the Texans surprisingly won it as the team went into their bye week at 6-1 and also went 1-6 all-time against the Ravens. The Texans punted to the Ravens who kicked a field goal to take a 3-0 lead. 3 drives later, Joe Flacco was sacked in his own endzone. That gave Houston 2 points and the ball. It was 3-2. Matt Schuab found Kevin Walters to make it 9-3 at the end of the first. Then Flacco was picked off at the Houston 48. Jonathan Joseph ran it back 52 yards for a touchdown to make it 16-3. On the next drive, Schuab found Owen Daniels to make it 23-3. Randy Bullock kicked 2 field goals to make it 29-3 at the half. Flacco found Tandon Doss to make it 29-10. Then Arian Foster scored to make it 36-10. Justin Tucker kicked a field goal to make it 36-13. Then Arian Foster ran in for the final score of the game making it 43-13."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many points were scored in the first half?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "32"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "2012 Baltimore Ravens seasonThe Texans had little time to think about the disappointing results the week before at home against Green Bay, as the Baltimore Ravens, the team who had eliminated them in the divisional round of the playoffs the previous year, were coming to town. The Texans rebounded from their worst performance of the year with arguably one of their best as they had limited Baltimore's revitalized offense to just 13, forcing two turnovers in an impressive win going into the bye week. It was the first time the Texans had ever defeated the Ravens in their franchise history (they had lost the previous six meetings, including the playoff matchup). Reliant Stadium set a new Texans home attendance record of 71,708 fans during the regular season. Likewise, the Ravens and Texans were the only 2 teams in the AFC who were above .500 at the point of this game. However, the Texans surprisingly won it as the team went into their bye week at 6-1 and also went 1-6 all-time against the Ravens. The Texans punted to the Ravens who kicked a field goal to take a 3-0 lead. 3 drives later, Joe Flacco was sacked in his own endzone. That gave Houston 2 points and the ball. It was 3-2. Matt Schuab found Kevin Walters to make it 9-3 at the end of the first. Then Flacco was picked off at the Houston 48. Jonathan Joseph ran it back 52 yards for a touchdown to make it 16-3. On the next drive, Schuab found Owen Daniels to make it 23-3. Randy Bullock kicked 2 field goals to make it 29-3 at the half. Flacco found Tandon Doss to make it 29-10. Then Arian Foster scored to make it 36-10. Justin Tucker kicked a field goal to make it 36-13. Then Arian Foster ran in for the final score of the game making it 43-13."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which team scored the last field goal of the game?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Baltimore Ravens"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "2012 Baltimore Ravens seasonThe Texans had little time to think about the disappointing results the week before at home against Green Bay, as the Baltimore Ravens, the team who had eliminated them in the divisional round of the playoffs the previous year, were coming to town. The Texans rebounded from their worst performance of the year with arguably one of their best as they had limited Baltimore's revitalized offense to just 13, forcing two turnovers in an impressive win going into the bye week. It was the first time the Texans had ever defeated the Ravens in their franchise history (they had lost the previous six meetings, including the playoff matchup). Reliant Stadium set a new Texans home attendance record of 71,708 fans during the regular season. Likewise, the Ravens and Texans were the only 2 teams in the AFC who were above .500 at the point of this game. However, the Texans surprisingly won it as the team went into their bye week at 6-1 and also went 1-6 all-time against the Ravens. The Texans punted to the Ravens who kicked a field goal to take a 3-0 lead. 3 drives later, Joe Flacco was sacked in his own endzone. That gave Houston 2 points and the ball. It was 3-2. Matt Schuab found Kevin Walters to make it 9-3 at the end of the first. Then Flacco was picked off at the Houston 48. Jonathan Joseph ran it back 52 yards for a touchdown to make it 16-3. On the next drive, Schuab found Owen Daniels to make it 23-3. Randy Bullock kicked 2 field goals to make it 29-3 at the half. Flacco found Tandon Doss to make it 29-10. Then Arian Foster scored to make it 36-10. Justin Tucker kicked a field goal to make it 36-13. Then Arian Foster ran in for the final score of the game making it 43-13."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Who scored the last touchdown of the game?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Arian Foster"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "2012 Baltimore Ravens seasonThe Texans had little time to think about the disappointing results the week before at home against Green Bay, as the Baltimore Ravens, the team who had eliminated them in the divisional round of the playoffs the previous year, were coming to town. The Texans rebounded from their worst performance of the year with arguably one of their best as they had limited Baltimore's revitalized offense to just 13, forcing two turnovers in an impressive win going into the bye week. It was the first time the Texans had ever defeated the Ravens in their franchise history (they had lost the previous six meetings, including the playoff matchup). Reliant Stadium set a new Texans home attendance record of 71,708 fans during the regular season. Likewise, the Ravens and Texans were the only 2 teams in the AFC who were above .500 at the point of this game. However, the Texans surprisingly won it as the team went into their bye week at 6-1 and also went 1-6 all-time against the Ravens. The Texans punted to the Ravens who kicked a field goal to take a 3-0 lead. 3 drives later, Joe Flacco was sacked in his own endzone. That gave Houston 2 points and the ball. It was 3-2. Matt Schuab found Kevin Walters to make it 9-3 at the end of the first. Then Flacco was picked off at the Houston 48. Jonathan Joseph ran it back 52 yards for a touchdown to make it 16-3. On the next drive, Schuab found Owen Daniels to make it 23-3. Randy Bullock kicked 2 field goals to make it 29-3 at the half. Flacco found Tandon Doss to make it 29-10. Then Arian Foster scored to make it 36-10. Justin Tucker kicked a field goal to make it 36-13. Then Arian Foster ran in for the final score of the game making it 43-13."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many more points did the winning team win by?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "30"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "2012 Baltimore Ravens seasonThe Texans had little time to think about the disappointing results the week before at home against Green Bay, as the Baltimore Ravens, the team who had eliminated them in the divisional round of the playoffs the previous year, were coming to town. The Texans rebounded from their worst performance of the year with arguably one of their best as they had limited Baltimore's revitalized offense to just 13, forcing two turnovers in an impressive win going into the bye week. It was the first time the Texans had ever defeated the Ravens in their franchise history (they had lost the previous six meetings, including the playoff matchup). Reliant Stadium set a new Texans home attendance record of 71,708 fans during the regular season. Likewise, the Ravens and Texans were the only 2 teams in the AFC who were above .500 at the point of this game. However, the Texans surprisingly won it as the team went into their bye week at 6-1 and also went 1-6 all-time against the Ravens. The Texans punted to the Ravens who kicked a field goal to take a 3-0 lead. 3 drives later, Joe Flacco was sacked in his own endzone. That gave Houston 2 points and the ball. It was 3-2. Matt Schuab found Kevin Walters to make it 9-3 at the end of the first. Then Flacco was picked off at the Houston 48. Jonathan Joseph ran it back 52 yards for a touchdown to make it 16-3. On the next drive, Schuab found Owen Daniels to make it 23-3. Randy Bullock kicked 2 field goals to make it 29-3 at the half. Flacco found Tandon Doss to make it 29-10. Then Arian Foster scored to make it 36-10. Justin Tucker kicked a field goal to make it 36-13. Then Arian Foster ran in for the final score of the game making it 43-13."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which player scored to make the total score 26 points?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Owen Daniels"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "2012 Baltimore Ravens seasonThe Texans had little time to think about the disappointing results the week before at home against Green Bay, as the Baltimore Ravens, the team who had eliminated them in the divisional round of the playoffs the previous year, were coming to town. The Texans rebounded from their worst performance of the year with arguably one of their best as they had limited Baltimore's revitalized offense to just 13, forcing two turnovers in an impressive win going into the bye week. It was the first time the Texans had ever defeated the Ravens in their franchise history (they had lost the previous six meetings, including the playoff matchup). Reliant Stadium set a new Texans home attendance record of 71,708 fans during the regular season. Likewise, the Ravens and Texans were the only 2 teams in the AFC who were above .500 at the point of this game. However, the Texans surprisingly won it as the team went into their bye week at 6-1 and also went 1-6 all-time against the Ravens. The Texans punted to the Ravens who kicked a field goal to take a 3-0 lead. 3 drives later, Joe Flacco was sacked in his own endzone. That gave Houston 2 points and the ball. It was 3-2. Matt Schuab found Kevin Walters to make it 9-3 at the end of the first. Then Flacco was picked off at the Houston 48. Jonathan Joseph ran it back 52 yards for a touchdown to make it 16-3. On the next drive, Schuab found Owen Daniels to make it 23-3. Randy Bullock kicked 2 field goals to make it 29-3 at the half. Flacco found Tandon Doss to make it 29-10. Then Arian Foster scored to make it 36-10. Justin Tucker kicked a field goal to make it 36-13. Then Arian Foster ran in for the final score of the game making it 43-13."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which kicker made multiple field goals in the second quarter?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Randy Bullock"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "2012 Baltimore Ravens seasonThe Texans had little time to think about the disappointing results the week before at home against Green Bay, as the Baltimore Ravens, the team who had eliminated them in the divisional round of the playoffs the previous year, were coming to town. The Texans rebounded from their worst performance of the year with arguably one of their best as they had limited Baltimore's revitalized offense to just 13, forcing two turnovers in an impressive win going into the bye week. It was the first time the Texans had ever defeated the Ravens in their franchise history (they had lost the previous six meetings, including the playoff matchup). Reliant Stadium set a new Texans home attendance record of 71,708 fans during the regular season. Likewise, the Ravens and Texans were the only 2 teams in the AFC who were above .500 at the point of this game. However, the Texans surprisingly won it as the team went into their bye week at 6-1 and also went 1-6 all-time against the Ravens. The Texans punted to the Ravens who kicked a field goal to take a 3-0 lead. 3 drives later, Joe Flacco was sacked in his own endzone. That gave Houston 2 points and the ball. It was 3-2. Matt Schuab found Kevin Walters to make it 9-3 at the end of the first. Then Flacco was picked off at the Houston 48. Jonathan Joseph ran it back 52 yards for a touchdown to make it 16-3. On the next drive, Schuab found Owen Daniels to make it 23-3. Randy Bullock kicked 2 field goals to make it 29-3 at the half. Flacco found Tandon Doss to make it 29-10. Then Arian Foster scored to make it 36-10. Justin Tucker kicked a field goal to make it 36-13. Then Arian Foster ran in for the final score of the game making it 43-13."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which team was eliminated by the Ravens from last years playoffs?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Texans"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "2012 Baltimore Ravens seasonThe Texans had little time to think about the disappointing results the week before at home against Green Bay, as the Baltimore Ravens, the team who had eliminated them in the divisional round of the playoffs the previous year, were coming to town. The Texans rebounded from their worst performance of the year with arguably one of their best as they had limited Baltimore's revitalized offense to just 13, forcing two turnovers in an impressive win going into the bye week. It was the first time the Texans had ever defeated the Ravens in their franchise history (they had lost the previous six meetings, including the playoff matchup). Reliant Stadium set a new Texans home attendance record of 71,708 fans during the regular season. Likewise, the Ravens and Texans were the only 2 teams in the AFC who were above .500 at the point of this game. However, the Texans surprisingly won it as the team went into their bye week at 6-1 and also went 1-6 all-time against the Ravens. The Texans punted to the Ravens who kicked a field goal to take a 3-0 lead. 3 drives later, Joe Flacco was sacked in his own endzone. That gave Houston 2 points and the ball. It was 3-2. Matt Schuab found Kevin Walters to make it 9-3 at the end of the first. Then Flacco was picked off at the Houston 48. Jonathan Joseph ran it back 52 yards for a touchdown to make it 16-3. On the next drive, Schuab found Owen Daniels to make it 23-3. Randy Bullock kicked 2 field goals to make it 29-3 at the half. Flacco found Tandon Doss to make it 29-10. Then Arian Foster scored to make it 36-10. Justin Tucker kicked a field goal to make it 36-13. Then Arian Foster ran in for the final score of the game making it 43-13."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Who did Texans play the week before?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Green Bay"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "2012 Baltimore Ravens seasonThe Texans had little time to think about the disappointing results the week before at home against Green Bay, as the Baltimore Ravens, the team who had eliminated them in the divisional round of the playoffs the previous year, were coming to town. The Texans rebounded from their worst performance of the year with arguably one of their best as they had limited Baltimore's revitalized offense to just 13, forcing two turnovers in an impressive win going into the bye week. It was the first time the Texans had ever defeated the Ravens in their franchise history (they had lost the previous six meetings, including the playoff matchup). Reliant Stadium set a new Texans home attendance record of 71,708 fans during the regular season. Likewise, the Ravens and Texans were the only 2 teams in the AFC who were above .500 at the point of this game. However, the Texans surprisingly won it as the team went into their bye week at 6-1 and also went 1-6 all-time against the Ravens. The Texans punted to the Ravens who kicked a field goal to take a 3-0 lead. 3 drives later, Joe Flacco was sacked in his own endzone. That gave Houston 2 points and the ball. It was 3-2. Matt Schuab found Kevin Walters to make it 9-3 at the end of the first. Then Flacco was picked off at the Houston 48. Jonathan Joseph ran it back 52 yards for a touchdown to make it 16-3. On the next drive, Schuab found Owen Daniels to make it 23-3. Randy Bullock kicked 2 field goals to make it 29-3 at the half. Flacco found Tandon Doss to make it 29-10. Then Arian Foster scored to make it 36-10. Justin Tucker kicked a field goal to make it 36-13. Then Arian Foster ran in for the final score of the game making it 43-13."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which team gave up two turnovers in this game?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Ravens"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "This game was notorious for a terrible playcall made by Colts' coach, Chuck Pagano. With the Colts trailing 27-21 late in the 3rd quarter, Pagano opted to go for it using special teams on 4th and 3 on the Colts' 37 yard line. However, a bizarre formation resulted in a Patriots sack, Colts turnover, and a flag for illegal formation. The Patriots easily scored a touchdown on the next drive and went on to win the game by 7 points, 34-27. The playcall was universally criticized and was considered by many to be the worst play in NFL history."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many points were scored in the game?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "61"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "This game was notorious for a terrible playcall made by Colts' coach, Chuck Pagano. With the Colts trailing 27-21 late in the 3rd quarter, Pagano opted to go for it using special teams on 4th and 3 on the Colts' 37 yard line. However, a bizarre formation resulted in a Patriots sack, Colts turnover, and a flag for illegal formation. The Patriots easily scored a touchdown on the next drive and went on to win the game by 7 points, 34-27. The playcall was universally criticized and was considered by many to be the worst play in NFL history."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many total points were scored in the game?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "61"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "In 1752, a new dynasty called Konbaung rose to challenge Restored Hanthawaddy, and went on to reunite much of the kingdom by 1758. In 1758-59, King Alaungpaya, the founder of the dynasty, sent an expedition to the farther Shan States , which had been annexed by the Qing over two decades earlier, to reestablish Burmese authority. . Three of the ten farther Shan state sawbwas and their militias reportedly ran away into Yunnan and tried to persuade Qing officials to invade Burma. The nephew of Kengtung sawbwa and his followers also fled. The Yunnan government reported the news to the Emperor in 1759, and the Qing court promptly issued an imperial edict ordering reconquest. At first, the Yunnan officials, who believed that \"barbarians must be conquered using barbarians\", tried to resolve the matter by supporting the defected sawbwas. But the strategy did not work. In 1764, a Burmese army, which was on its way to Siam, was increasing its grip of the borderlands, and the sawbwas complained to China. In response, the Emperor appointed Liu Zao, a respected scholarly minister from the capital to sort out the matters. At Kunming, Liu assessed that the use of Tai-Shan militias alone was not working, and that he needed to commit regular Green Standard Army troops."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "WHAT DID THE YUNNAN OFFICIALS BELIEVE IT WOULD TAKE TO CONQUER BARBARIANS"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "barbarians"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "In 1752, a new dynasty called Konbaung rose to challenge Restored Hanthawaddy, and went on to reunite much of the kingdom by 1758. In 1758-59, King Alaungpaya, the founder of the dynasty, sent an expedition to the farther Shan States , which had been annexed by the Qing over two decades earlier, to reestablish Burmese authority. . Three of the ten farther Shan state sawbwas and their militias reportedly ran away into Yunnan and tried to persuade Qing officials to invade Burma. The nephew of Kengtung sawbwa and his followers also fled. The Yunnan government reported the news to the Emperor in 1759, and the Qing court promptly issued an imperial edict ordering reconquest. At first, the Yunnan officials, who believed that \"barbarians must be conquered using barbarians\", tried to resolve the matter by supporting the defected sawbwas. But the strategy did not work. In 1764, a Burmese army, which was on its way to Siam, was increasing its grip of the borderlands, and the sawbwas complained to China. In response, the Emperor appointed Liu Zao, a respected scholarly minister from the capital to sort out the matters. At Kunming, Liu assessed that the use of Tai-Shan militias alone was not working, and that he needed to commit regular Green Standard Army troops."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "how many shan state sawbwas and militias that did not run away into yunnan ?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "7"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "In 1752, a new dynasty called Konbaung rose to challenge Restored Hanthawaddy, and went on to reunite much of the kingdom by 1758. In 1758-59, King Alaungpaya, the founder of the dynasty, sent an expedition to the farther Shan States , which had been annexed by the Qing over two decades earlier, to reestablish Burmese authority. . Three of the ten farther Shan state sawbwas and their militias reportedly ran away into Yunnan and tried to persuade Qing officials to invade Burma. The nephew of Kengtung sawbwa and his followers also fled. The Yunnan government reported the news to the Emperor in 1759, and the Qing court promptly issued an imperial edict ordering reconquest. At first, the Yunnan officials, who believed that \"barbarians must be conquered using barbarians\", tried to resolve the matter by supporting the defected sawbwas. But the strategy did not work. In 1764, a Burmese army, which was on its way to Siam, was increasing its grip of the borderlands, and the sawbwas complained to China. In response, the Emperor appointed Liu Zao, a respected scholarly minister from the capital to sort out the matters. At Kunming, Liu assessed that the use of Tai-Shan militias alone was not working, and that he needed to commit regular Green Standard Army troops."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "HOW MANY YEARS DID IT TAKE THE KONBAUNG TO RESTORE HANTHAWADDY, AND REUNITE MUCH OF THE KINGDOM ?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "6"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "In 1752, a new dynasty called Konbaung rose to challenge Restored Hanthawaddy, and went on to reunite much of the kingdom by 1758. In 1758-59, King Alaungpaya, the founder of the dynasty, sent an expedition to the farther Shan States , which had been annexed by the Qing over two decades earlier, to reestablish Burmese authority. . Three of the ten farther Shan state sawbwas and their militias reportedly ran away into Yunnan and tried to persuade Qing officials to invade Burma. The nephew of Kengtung sawbwa and his followers also fled. The Yunnan government reported the news to the Emperor in 1759, and the Qing court promptly issued an imperial edict ordering reconquest. At first, the Yunnan officials, who believed that \"barbarians must be conquered using barbarians\", tried to resolve the matter by supporting the defected sawbwas. But the strategy did not work. In 1764, a Burmese army, which was on its way to Siam, was increasing its grip of the borderlands, and the sawbwas complained to China. In response, the Emperor appointed Liu Zao, a respected scholarly minister from the capital to sort out the matters. At Kunming, Liu assessed that the use of Tai-Shan militias alone was not working, and that he needed to commit regular Green Standard Army troops."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "THE FOUNDER OF THE DYNASTY SENT AN EXPEDITION TO REESTABLISH ANNEXED SHAN STATES FROM WHO ?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "the Qing"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "In 1752, a new dynasty called Konbaung rose to challenge Restored Hanthawaddy, and went on to reunite much of the kingdom by 1758. In 1758-59, King Alaungpaya, the founder of the dynasty, sent an expedition to the farther Shan States , which had been annexed by the Qing over two decades earlier, to reestablish Burmese authority. . Three of the ten farther Shan state sawbwas and their militias reportedly ran away into Yunnan and tried to persuade Qing officials to invade Burma. The nephew of Kengtung sawbwa and his followers also fled. The Yunnan government reported the news to the Emperor in 1759, and the Qing court promptly issued an imperial edict ordering reconquest. At first, the Yunnan officials, who believed that \"barbarians must be conquered using barbarians\", tried to resolve the matter by supporting the defected sawbwas. But the strategy did not work. In 1764, a Burmese army, which was on its way to Siam, was increasing its grip of the borderlands, and the sawbwas complained to China. In response, the Emperor appointed Liu Zao, a respected scholarly minister from the capital to sort out the matters. At Kunming, Liu assessed that the use of Tai-Shan militias alone was not working, and that he needed to commit regular Green Standard Army troops."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "WHO FOUNDED KONBAUNG AND RESTORED HANTHAWADDY"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "King Alaungpaya"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "In 1752, a new dynasty called Konbaung rose to challenge Restored Hanthawaddy, and went on to reunite much of the kingdom by 1758. In 1758-59, King Alaungpaya, the founder of the dynasty, sent an expedition to the farther Shan States , which had been annexed by the Qing over two decades earlier, to reestablish Burmese authority. . Three of the ten farther Shan state sawbwas and their militias reportedly ran away into Yunnan and tried to persuade Qing officials to invade Burma. The nephew of Kengtung sawbwa and his followers also fled. The Yunnan government reported the news to the Emperor in 1759, and the Qing court promptly issued an imperial edict ordering reconquest. At first, the Yunnan officials, who believed that \"barbarians must be conquered using barbarians\", tried to resolve the matter by supporting the defected sawbwas. But the strategy did not work. In 1764, a Burmese army, which was on its way to Siam, was increasing its grip of the borderlands, and the sawbwas complained to China. In response, the Emperor appointed Liu Zao, a respected scholarly minister from the capital to sort out the matters. At Kunming, Liu assessed that the use of Tai-Shan militias alone was not working, and that he needed to commit regular Green Standard Army troops."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many years after Konbaung dynasty rose was much of the kingom reunited?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "6"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "In 1752, a new dynasty called Konbaung rose to challenge Restored Hanthawaddy, and went on to reunite much of the kingdom by 1758. In 1758-59, King Alaungpaya, the founder of the dynasty, sent an expedition to the farther Shan States , which had been annexed by the Qing over two decades earlier, to reestablish Burmese authority. . Three of the ten farther Shan state sawbwas and their militias reportedly ran away into Yunnan and tried to persuade Qing officials to invade Burma. The nephew of Kengtung sawbwa and his followers also fled. The Yunnan government reported the news to the Emperor in 1759, and the Qing court promptly issued an imperial edict ordering reconquest. At first, the Yunnan officials, who believed that \"barbarians must be conquered using barbarians\", tried to resolve the matter by supporting the defected sawbwas. But the strategy did not work. In 1764, a Burmese army, which was on its way to Siam, was increasing its grip of the borderlands, and the sawbwas complained to China. In response, the Emperor appointed Liu Zao, a respected scholarly minister from the capital to sort out the matters. At Kunming, Liu assessed that the use of Tai-Shan militias alone was not working, and that he needed to commit regular Green Standard Army troops."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many years did King Alaungpaya send an expedition to the farther Shan States?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "1"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "In 1752, a new dynasty called Konbaung rose to challenge Restored Hanthawaddy, and went on to reunite much of the kingdom by 1758. In 1758-59, King Alaungpaya, the founder of the dynasty, sent an expedition to the farther Shan States , which had been annexed by the Qing over two decades earlier, to reestablish Burmese authority. . Three of the ten farther Shan state sawbwas and their militias reportedly ran away into Yunnan and tried to persuade Qing officials to invade Burma. The nephew of Kengtung sawbwa and his followers also fled. The Yunnan government reported the news to the Emperor in 1759, and the Qing court promptly issued an imperial edict ordering reconquest. At first, the Yunnan officials, who believed that \"barbarians must be conquered using barbarians\", tried to resolve the matter by supporting the defected sawbwas. But the strategy did not work. In 1764, a Burmese army, which was on its way to Siam, was increasing its grip of the borderlands, and the sawbwas complained to China. In response, the Emperor appointed Liu Zao, a respected scholarly minister from the capital to sort out the matters. At Kunming, Liu assessed that the use of Tai-Shan militias alone was not working, and that he needed to commit regular Green Standard Army troops."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many years had passed from when the Yunnan government reported the news to the Emperor until a Burmese army was increasing its grip of the borderlands?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "5"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "In 1752, a new dynasty called Konbaung rose to challenge Restored Hanthawaddy, and went on to reunite much of the kingdom by 1758. In 1758-59, King Alaungpaya, the founder of the dynasty, sent an expedition to the farther Shan States , which had been annexed by the Qing over two decades earlier, to reestablish Burmese authority. . Three of the ten farther Shan state sawbwas and their militias reportedly ran away into Yunnan and tried to persuade Qing officials to invade Burma. The nephew of Kengtung sawbwa and his followers also fled. The Yunnan government reported the news to the Emperor in 1759, and the Qing court promptly issued an imperial edict ordering reconquest. At first, the Yunnan officials, who believed that \"barbarians must be conquered using barbarians\", tried to resolve the matter by supporting the defected sawbwas. But the strategy did not work. In 1764, a Burmese army, which was on its way to Siam, was increasing its grip of the borderlands, and the sawbwas complained to China. In response, the Emperor appointed Liu Zao, a respected scholarly minister from the capital to sort out the matters. At Kunming, Liu assessed that the use of Tai-Shan militias alone was not working, and that he needed to commit regular Green Standard Army troops."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which occurred first, the Qing court issued an imperial edict ordering reconquest or a Burmese army was increasing its grip of the borderlands?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "imperial edict ordering reconquest"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "In 1752, a new dynasty called Konbaung rose to challenge Restored Hanthawaddy, and went on to reunite much of the kingdom by 1758. In 1758-59, King Alaungpaya, the founder of the dynasty, sent an expedition to the farther Shan States , which had been annexed by the Qing over two decades earlier, to reestablish Burmese authority. . Three of the ten farther Shan state sawbwas and their militias reportedly ran away into Yunnan and tried to persuade Qing officials to invade Burma. The nephew of Kengtung sawbwa and his followers also fled. The Yunnan government reported the news to the Emperor in 1759, and the Qing court promptly issued an imperial edict ordering reconquest. At first, the Yunnan officials, who believed that \"barbarians must be conquered using barbarians\", tried to resolve the matter by supporting the defected sawbwas. But the strategy did not work. In 1764, a Burmese army, which was on its way to Siam, was increasing its grip of the borderlands, and the sawbwas complained to China. In response, the Emperor appointed Liu Zao, a respected scholarly minister from the capital to sort out the matters. At Kunming, Liu assessed that the use of Tai-Shan militias alone was not working, and that he needed to commit regular Green Standard Army troops."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many years after a new dynasty called Konbaung rose to challenge Restored Hanthawaddy was much of the kingdom reunited?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "6"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "In 1752, a new dynasty called Konbaung rose to challenge Restored Hanthawaddy, and went on to reunite much of the kingdom by 1758. In 1758-59, King Alaungpaya, the founder of the dynasty, sent an expedition to the farther Shan States , which had been annexed by the Qing over two decades earlier, to reestablish Burmese authority. . Three of the ten farther Shan state sawbwas and their militias reportedly ran away into Yunnan and tried to persuade Qing officials to invade Burma. The nephew of Kengtung sawbwa and his followers also fled. The Yunnan government reported the news to the Emperor in 1759, and the Qing court promptly issued an imperial edict ordering reconquest. At first, the Yunnan officials, who believed that \"barbarians must be conquered using barbarians\", tried to resolve the matter by supporting the defected sawbwas. But the strategy did not work. In 1764, a Burmese army, which was on its way to Siam, was increasing its grip of the borderlands, and the sawbwas complained to China. In response, the Emperor appointed Liu Zao, a respected scholarly minister from the capital to sort out the matters. At Kunming, Liu assessed that the use of Tai-Shan militias alone was not working, and that he needed to commit regular Green Standard Army troops."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many years after the Yunnan officials reported the news to the emperor did a Burmese Army increase its grip on the borderlands?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "5"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "In 1752, a new dynasty called Konbaung rose to challenge Restored Hanthawaddy, and went on to reunite much of the kingdom by 1758. In 1758-59, King Alaungpaya, the founder of the dynasty, sent an expedition to the farther Shan States , which had been annexed by the Qing over two decades earlier, to reestablish Burmese authority. . Three of the ten farther Shan state sawbwas and their militias reportedly ran away into Yunnan and tried to persuade Qing officials to invade Burma. The nephew of Kengtung sawbwa and his followers also fled. The Yunnan government reported the news to the Emperor in 1759, and the Qing court promptly issued an imperial edict ordering reconquest. At first, the Yunnan officials, who believed that \"barbarians must be conquered using barbarians\", tried to resolve the matter by supporting the defected sawbwas. But the strategy did not work. In 1764, a Burmese army, which was on its way to Siam, was increasing its grip of the borderlands, and the sawbwas complained to China. In response, the Emperor appointed Liu Zao, a respected scholarly minister from the capital to sort out the matters. At Kunming, Liu assessed that the use of Tai-Shan militias alone was not working, and that he needed to commit regular Green Standard Army troops."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many years did it take for the Konbaung to reunite much of the kingdom?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "6"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "In 1752, a new dynasty called Konbaung rose to challenge Restored Hanthawaddy, and went on to reunite much of the kingdom by 1758. In 1758-59, King Alaungpaya, the founder of the dynasty, sent an expedition to the farther Shan States , which had been annexed by the Qing over two decades earlier, to reestablish Burmese authority. . Three of the ten farther Shan state sawbwas and their militias reportedly ran away into Yunnan and tried to persuade Qing officials to invade Burma. The nephew of Kengtung sawbwa and his followers also fled. The Yunnan government reported the news to the Emperor in 1759, and the Qing court promptly issued an imperial edict ordering reconquest. At first, the Yunnan officials, who believed that \"barbarians must be conquered using barbarians\", tried to resolve the matter by supporting the defected sawbwas. But the strategy did not work. In 1764, a Burmese army, which was on its way to Siam, was increasing its grip of the borderlands, and the sawbwas complained to China. In response, the Emperor appointed Liu Zao, a respected scholarly minister from the capital to sort out the matters. At Kunming, Liu assessed that the use of Tai-Shan militias alone was not working, and that he needed to commit regular Green Standard Army troops."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many of the ten farther Shan state sawbwas did not run away to Yunnan?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "7"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Following their embarrassing divisional road loss, the Bengals flew to Qwest Field for an interconference fight with the Seattle Seahawks. The Seahawks won the toss, opted to receive the ball, and then proceeded to return the opening kickoff deep into Cincinnati territory. Seahawk QB Matt Hasselbeck completed an 18-yard TD pass to WR Bobby Engram on that drive. Cincinnati responded with QB Carson Palmer completing a 35-yard TD pass to WR T. J. Houshmandzadeh. In the second quarter, the Bengals took the lead with kicker Shayne Graham getting a 43-yard field goal. However, Seattle took the lead with Hasselbeck completing a 42-yard TD to WR Deion Branch. In the third quarter, Cincinnati would strike back with LB Lemar Marshall sacked Hasselbeck in his own end zone for a safety, along with the only score of the period. In the fourth quarter, the Bengals would take the lead with Graham getting a 24-yard field goal. The Seahawks would respond with kicker Josh Brown getting a 23-yard field goal, while Cincinnati retook the lead with RB Kenny Watson getting an 8-yard TD run (with a failed 2-point conversion). However, Seattle took the lead with Hasselbeck completing a 22-yard TD pass to WR Nate Burleson. The Bengals' special teams unit tried to get Palmer and his offense decent field position, but WR Glenn Holt fumbled the return at their own 29-yard line, allowing the Seahawks to recover the ball for the win. Watson came into the game because Rudi Johnson was injured. Leon Hall got his first NFL interception. Houshmandzadeh and Chad Johnson both gained more than 125 yards each receiving. Levi Jones saw his most extensive playing time so far in the season after an injury to Stacey Andrews forced the offensive line to be reshuffled. T"
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many field goals did Graham make?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "2"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "On 26 August 1643, during the minority of the former chief, \"the Estates of the Kingdom passed an Act for the Committees of War in the shires of Scotland\", and among the Commissioners for the Sheriffdom of Sutherland and a par of Inverness-shire, occurs the name of \"Sir Robert Munro, tutour of Foulles\"; and again on 24 July 1644, in a commission for a similar purpose and for the same Sheriffdom is found the name of \"Sir Robert Monro, Tutor of Foullis\". In 1649, the Scottish Parliament separated from the Sherriffdom of Inverness-shire the \"lands eastward of Altnalait, Knockravock and the Royal Burgh of Tain\", erected the Sherriffdom of Ross, and appointed the Marquiss of Argyll the Sherriff-Principal. Afterwards the commission was granted to Sir Robert Munro, who had been elected Member of Parliament for Inverness-shire in 1649 and for his own County of Ross after it was separated from the County of Inverness, 1649-50, to be Sheriff-Principal of the County of Ross. In 1651 Robert succeeded to the head of his house, upon the death of his cousin Sir Hector Munro, 2nd Baronet of Foulis who died at just 17 years of age, as already mentioned. Robert took up his residence in Foulis Castle."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "What happened last, the death of Sir Hector Munro or Robert succeeding as head of the house?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Robert succeeding as head of the house"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "On 26 August 1643, during the minority of the former chief, \"the Estates of the Kingdom passed an Act for the Committees of War in the shires of Scotland\", and among the Commissioners for the Sheriffdom of Sutherland and a par of Inverness-shire, occurs the name of \"Sir Robert Munro, tutour of Foulles\"; and again on 24 July 1644, in a commission for a similar purpose and for the same Sheriffdom is found the name of \"Sir Robert Monro, Tutor of Foullis\". In 1649, the Scottish Parliament separated from the Sherriffdom of Inverness-shire the \"lands eastward of Altnalait, Knockravock and the Royal Burgh of Tain\", erected the Sherriffdom of Ross, and appointed the Marquiss of Argyll the Sherriff-Principal. Afterwards the commission was granted to Sir Robert Munro, who had been elected Member of Parliament for Inverness-shire in 1649 and for his own County of Ross after it was separated from the County of Inverness, 1649-50, to be Sheriff-Principal of the County of Ross. In 1651 Robert succeeded to the head of his house, upon the death of his cousin Sir Hector Munro, 2nd Baronet of Foulis who died at just 17 years of age, as already mentioned. Robert took up his residence in Foulis Castle."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many years was the County of Ross separated from the County of Iverness?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "1"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "On 26 August 1643, during the minority of the former chief, \"the Estates of the Kingdom passed an Act for the Committees of War in the shires of Scotland\", and among the Commissioners for the Sheriffdom of Sutherland and a par of Inverness-shire, occurs the name of \"Sir Robert Munro, tutour of Foulles\"; and again on 24 July 1644, in a commission for a similar purpose and for the same Sheriffdom is found the name of \"Sir Robert Monro, Tutor of Foullis\". In 1649, the Scottish Parliament separated from the Sherriffdom of Inverness-shire the \"lands eastward of Altnalait, Knockravock and the Royal Burgh of Tain\", erected the Sherriffdom of Ross, and appointed the Marquiss of Argyll the Sherriff-Principal. Afterwards the commission was granted to Sir Robert Munro, who had been elected Member of Parliament for Inverness-shire in 1649 and for his own County of Ross after it was separated from the County of Inverness, 1649-50, to be Sheriff-Principal of the County of Ross. In 1651 Robert succeeded to the head of his house, upon the death of his cousin Sir Hector Munro, 2nd Baronet of Foulis who died at just 17 years of age, as already mentioned. Robert took up his residence in Foulis Castle."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "What happened first, Scottish Parliament separated from Sherriffdom or passing of Act for the Committees of War"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "passing of Act for the Committees of War"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "On 26 August 1643, during the minority of the former chief, \"the Estates of the Kingdom passed an Act for the Committees of War in the shires of Scotland\", and among the Commissioners for the Sheriffdom of Sutherland and a par of Inverness-shire, occurs the name of \"Sir Robert Munro, tutour of Foulles\"; and again on 24 July 1644, in a commission for a similar purpose and for the same Sheriffdom is found the name of \"Sir Robert Monro, Tutor of Foullis\". In 1649, the Scottish Parliament separated from the Sherriffdom of Inverness-shire the \"lands eastward of Altnalait, Knockravock and the Royal Burgh of Tain\", erected the Sherriffdom of Ross, and appointed the Marquiss of Argyll the Sherriff-Principal. Afterwards the commission was granted to Sir Robert Munro, who had been elected Member of Parliament for Inverness-shire in 1649 and for his own County of Ross after it was separated from the County of Inverness, 1649-50, to be Sheriff-Principal of the County of Ross. In 1651 Robert succeeded to the head of his house, upon the death of his cousin Sir Hector Munro, 2nd Baronet of Foulis who died at just 17 years of age, as already mentioned. Robert took up his residence in Foulis Castle."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "What happened first: Act of Committees of War or the separation of Scottish Parliament?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Act of Committees of War"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "On 26 August 1643, during the minority of the former chief, \"the Estates of the Kingdom passed an Act for the Committees of War in the shires of Scotland\", and among the Commissioners for the Sheriffdom of Sutherland and a par of Inverness-shire, occurs the name of \"Sir Robert Munro, tutour of Foulles\"; and again on 24 July 1644, in a commission for a similar purpose and for the same Sheriffdom is found the name of \"Sir Robert Monro, Tutor of Foullis\". In 1649, the Scottish Parliament separated from the Sherriffdom of Inverness-shire the \"lands eastward of Altnalait, Knockravock and the Royal Burgh of Tain\", erected the Sherriffdom of Ross, and appointed the Marquiss of Argyll the Sherriff-Principal. Afterwards the commission was granted to Sir Robert Munro, who had been elected Member of Parliament for Inverness-shire in 1649 and for his own County of Ross after it was separated from the County of Inverness, 1649-50, to be Sheriff-Principal of the County of Ross. In 1651 Robert succeeded to the head of his house, upon the death of his cousin Sir Hector Munro, 2nd Baronet of Foulis who died at just 17 years of age, as already mentioned. Robert took up his residence in Foulis Castle."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "What happened second: Act of Committees of War or the separation of Scottish Parliament?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "the separation of Scottish Parliament"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "On 26 August 1643, during the minority of the former chief, \"the Estates of the Kingdom passed an Act for the Committees of War in the shires of Scotland\", and among the Commissioners for the Sheriffdom of Sutherland and a par of Inverness-shire, occurs the name of \"Sir Robert Munro, tutour of Foulles\"; and again on 24 July 1644, in a commission for a similar purpose and for the same Sheriffdom is found the name of \"Sir Robert Monro, Tutor of Foullis\". In 1649, the Scottish Parliament separated from the Sherriffdom of Inverness-shire the \"lands eastward of Altnalait, Knockravock and the Royal Burgh of Tain\", erected the Sherriffdom of Ross, and appointed the Marquiss of Argyll the Sherriff-Principal. Afterwards the commission was granted to Sir Robert Munro, who had been elected Member of Parliament for Inverness-shire in 1649 and for his own County of Ross after it was separated from the County of Inverness, 1649-50, to be Sheriff-Principal of the County of Ross. In 1651 Robert succeeded to the head of his house, upon the death of his cousin Sir Hector Munro, 2nd Baronet of Foulis who died at just 17 years of age, as already mentioned. Robert took up his residence in Foulis Castle."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "What happened first: commission being granted to Sir Robert or death of his cousin?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "commission being granted to Sir Robert"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "On 26 August 1643, during the minority of the former chief, \"the Estates of the Kingdom passed an Act for the Committees of War in the shires of Scotland\", and among the Commissioners for the Sheriffdom of Sutherland and a par of Inverness-shire, occurs the name of \"Sir Robert Munro, tutour of Foulles\"; and again on 24 July 1644, in a commission for a similar purpose and for the same Sheriffdom is found the name of \"Sir Robert Monro, Tutor of Foullis\". In 1649, the Scottish Parliament separated from the Sherriffdom of Inverness-shire the \"lands eastward of Altnalait, Knockravock and the Royal Burgh of Tain\", erected the Sherriffdom of Ross, and appointed the Marquiss of Argyll the Sherriff-Principal. Afterwards the commission was granted to Sir Robert Munro, who had been elected Member of Parliament for Inverness-shire in 1649 and for his own County of Ross after it was separated from the County of Inverness, 1649-50, to be Sheriff-Principal of the County of Ross. In 1651 Robert succeeded to the head of his house, upon the death of his cousin Sir Hector Munro, 2nd Baronet of Foulis who died at just 17 years of age, as already mentioned. Robert took up his residence in Foulis Castle."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "What happened second: commission being granted to Sir Robert or death of his cousin?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "death of his cousin"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "On 26 August 1643, during the minority of the former chief, \"the Estates of the Kingdom passed an Act for the Committees of War in the shires of Scotland\", and among the Commissioners for the Sheriffdom of Sutherland and a par of Inverness-shire, occurs the name of \"Sir Robert Munro, tutour of Foulles\"; and again on 24 July 1644, in a commission for a similar purpose and for the same Sheriffdom is found the name of \"Sir Robert Monro, Tutor of Foullis\". In 1649, the Scottish Parliament separated from the Sherriffdom of Inverness-shire the \"lands eastward of Altnalait, Knockravock and the Royal Burgh of Tain\", erected the Sherriffdom of Ross, and appointed the Marquiss of Argyll the Sherriff-Principal. Afterwards the commission was granted to Sir Robert Munro, who had been elected Member of Parliament for Inverness-shire in 1649 and for his own County of Ross after it was separated from the County of Inverness, 1649-50, to be Sheriff-Principal of the County of Ross. In 1651 Robert succeeded to the head of his house, upon the death of his cousin Sir Hector Munro, 2nd Baronet of Foulis who died at just 17 years of age, as already mentioned. Robert took up his residence in Foulis Castle."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many years passed between the passing of the Act for the Committees of War and Robert succeeding to the head of his house?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "8"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "On 26 August 1643, during the minority of the former chief, \"the Estates of the Kingdom passed an Act for the Committees of War in the shires of Scotland\", and among the Commissioners for the Sheriffdom of Sutherland and a par of Inverness-shire, occurs the name of \"Sir Robert Munro, tutour of Foulles\"; and again on 24 July 1644, in a commission for a similar purpose and for the same Sheriffdom is found the name of \"Sir Robert Monro, Tutor of Foullis\". In 1649, the Scottish Parliament separated from the Sherriffdom of Inverness-shire the \"lands eastward of Altnalait, Knockravock and the Royal Burgh of Tain\", erected the Sherriffdom of Ross, and appointed the Marquiss of Argyll the Sherriff-Principal. Afterwards the commission was granted to Sir Robert Munro, who had been elected Member of Parliament for Inverness-shire in 1649 and for his own County of Ross after it was separated from the County of Inverness, 1649-50, to be Sheriff-Principal of the County of Ross. In 1651 Robert succeeded to the head of his house, upon the death of his cousin Sir Hector Munro, 2nd Baronet of Foulis who died at just 17 years of age, as already mentioned. Robert took up his residence in Foulis Castle."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "What year was Sir Hector Munro born if he died at 17 years old in 1651?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "1634"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "On 26 August 1643, during the minority of the former chief, \"the Estates of the Kingdom passed an Act for the Committees of War in the shires of Scotland\", and among the Commissioners for the Sheriffdom of Sutherland and a par of Inverness-shire, occurs the name of \"Sir Robert Munro, tutour of Foulles\"; and again on 24 July 1644, in a commission for a similar purpose and for the same Sheriffdom is found the name of \"Sir Robert Monro, Tutor of Foullis\". In 1649, the Scottish Parliament separated from the Sherriffdom of Inverness-shire the \"lands eastward of Altnalait, Knockravock and the Royal Burgh of Tain\", erected the Sherriffdom of Ross, and appointed the Marquiss of Argyll the Sherriff-Principal. Afterwards the commission was granted to Sir Robert Munro, who had been elected Member of Parliament for Inverness-shire in 1649 and for his own County of Ross after it was separated from the County of Inverness, 1649-50, to be Sheriff-Principal of the County of Ross. In 1651 Robert succeeded to the head of his house, upon the death of his cousin Sir Hector Munro, 2nd Baronet of Foulis who died at just 17 years of age, as already mentioned. Robert took up his residence in Foulis Castle."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many months after the minority of the former chief occured the name of \"Sir Robert Munro, tutour of Foulles\" did it occur again in the commission found in the name of \"Sir Robert Monro, Tutor of Foullis\""
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "11"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "On 26 August 1643, during the minority of the former chief, \"the Estates of the Kingdom passed an Act for the Committees of War in the shires of Scotland\", and among the Commissioners for the Sheriffdom of Sutherland and a par of Inverness-shire, occurs the name of \"Sir Robert Munro, tutour of Foulles\"; and again on 24 July 1644, in a commission for a similar purpose and for the same Sheriffdom is found the name of \"Sir Robert Monro, Tutor of Foullis\". In 1649, the Scottish Parliament separated from the Sherriffdom of Inverness-shire the \"lands eastward of Altnalait, Knockravock and the Royal Burgh of Tain\", erected the Sherriffdom of Ross, and appointed the Marquiss of Argyll the Sherriff-Principal. Afterwards the commission was granted to Sir Robert Munro, who had been elected Member of Parliament for Inverness-shire in 1649 and for his own County of Ross after it was separated from the County of Inverness, 1649-50, to be Sheriff-Principal of the County of Ross. In 1651 Robert succeeded to the head of his house, upon the death of his cousin Sir Hector Munro, 2nd Baronet of Foulis who died at just 17 years of age, as already mentioned. Robert took up his residence in Foulis Castle."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many years after Sir Robert Munro had been elected Member of Parliament for Inverness-shire did he succeed to the head of his house upon the death of his cousin Sir Hector Munro?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "2"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "On 26 August 1643, during the minority of the former chief, \"the Estates of the Kingdom passed an Act for the Committees of War in the shires of Scotland\", and among the Commissioners for the Sheriffdom of Sutherland and a par of Inverness-shire, occurs the name of \"Sir Robert Munro, tutour of Foulles\"; and again on 24 July 1644, in a commission for a similar purpose and for the same Sheriffdom is found the name of \"Sir Robert Monro, Tutor of Foullis\". In 1649, the Scottish Parliament separated from the Sherriffdom of Inverness-shire the \"lands eastward of Altnalait, Knockravock and the Royal Burgh of Tain\", erected the Sherriffdom of Ross, and appointed the Marquiss of Argyll the Sherriff-Principal. Afterwards the commission was granted to Sir Robert Munro, who had been elected Member of Parliament for Inverness-shire in 1649 and for his own County of Ross after it was separated from the County of Inverness, 1649-50, to be Sheriff-Principal of the County of Ross. In 1651 Robert succeeded to the head of his house, upon the death of his cousin Sir Hector Munro, 2nd Baronet of Foulis who died at just 17 years of age, as already mentioned. Robert took up his residence in Foulis Castle."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "What year was Sir Robert's cousin Sir Hector Munro, 2nd Baronet of Foulis born?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "1634"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "On 26 August 1643, during the minority of the former chief, \"the Estates of the Kingdom passed an Act for the Committees of War in the shires of Scotland\", and among the Commissioners for the Sheriffdom of Sutherland and a par of Inverness-shire, occurs the name of \"Sir Robert Munro, tutour of Foulles\"; and again on 24 July 1644, in a commission for a similar purpose and for the same Sheriffdom is found the name of \"Sir Robert Monro, Tutor of Foullis\". In 1649, the Scottish Parliament separated from the Sherriffdom of Inverness-shire the \"lands eastward of Altnalait, Knockravock and the Royal Burgh of Tain\", erected the Sherriffdom of Ross, and appointed the Marquiss of Argyll the Sherriff-Principal. Afterwards the commission was granted to Sir Robert Munro, who had been elected Member of Parliament for Inverness-shire in 1649 and for his own County of Ross after it was separated from the County of Inverness, 1649-50, to be Sheriff-Principal of the County of Ross. In 1651 Robert succeeded to the head of his house, upon the death of his cousin Sir Hector Munro, 2nd Baronet of Foulis who died at just 17 years of age, as already mentioned. Robert took up his residence in Foulis Castle."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "What year was Sir Hector Munro born in?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "1634"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "On 26 August 1643, during the minority of the former chief, \"the Estates of the Kingdom passed an Act for the Committees of War in the shires of Scotland\", and among the Commissioners for the Sheriffdom of Sutherland and a par of Inverness-shire, occurs the name of \"Sir Robert Munro, tutour of Foulles\"; and again on 24 July 1644, in a commission for a similar purpose and for the same Sheriffdom is found the name of \"Sir Robert Monro, Tutor of Foullis\". In 1649, the Scottish Parliament separated from the Sherriffdom of Inverness-shire the \"lands eastward of Altnalait, Knockravock and the Royal Burgh of Tain\", erected the Sherriffdom of Ross, and appointed the Marquiss of Argyll the Sherriff-Principal. Afterwards the commission was granted to Sir Robert Munro, who had been elected Member of Parliament for Inverness-shire in 1649 and for his own County of Ross after it was separated from the County of Inverness, 1649-50, to be Sheriff-Principal of the County of Ross. In 1651 Robert succeeded to the head of his house, upon the death of his cousin Sir Hector Munro, 2nd Baronet of Foulis who died at just 17 years of age, as already mentioned. Robert took up his residence in Foulis Castle."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many years after Sir Robert Munro was elected Member of Parliament for Inverness-shire did he succeede to the head of his house?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "2"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "On 26 August 1643, during the minority of the former chief, \"the Estates of the Kingdom passed an Act for the Committees of War in the shires of Scotland\", and among the Commissioners for the Sheriffdom of Sutherland and a par of Inverness-shire, occurs the name of \"Sir Robert Munro, tutour of Foulles\"; and again on 24 July 1644, in a commission for a similar purpose and for the same Sheriffdom is found the name of \"Sir Robert Monro, Tutor of Foullis\". In 1649, the Scottish Parliament separated from the Sherriffdom of Inverness-shire the \"lands eastward of Altnalait, Knockravock and the Royal Burgh of Tain\", erected the Sherriffdom of Ross, and appointed the Marquiss of Argyll the Sherriff-Principal. Afterwards the commission was granted to Sir Robert Munro, who had been elected Member of Parliament for Inverness-shire in 1649 and for his own County of Ross after it was separated from the County of Inverness, 1649-50, to be Sheriff-Principal of the County of Ross. In 1651 Robert succeeded to the head of his house, upon the death of his cousin Sir Hector Munro, 2nd Baronet of Foulis who died at just 17 years of age, as already mentioned. Robert took up his residence in Foulis Castle."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "What year was Sir Hector Munro, 2nd Baronet of Foulis born?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "1634"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "On 26 August 1643, during the minority of the former chief, \"the Estates of the Kingdom passed an Act for the Committees of War in the shires of Scotland\", and among the Commissioners for the Sheriffdom of Sutherland and a par of Inverness-shire, occurs the name of \"Sir Robert Munro, tutour of Foulles\"; and again on 24 July 1644, in a commission for a similar purpose and for the same Sheriffdom is found the name of \"Sir Robert Monro, Tutor of Foullis\". In 1649, the Scottish Parliament separated from the Sherriffdom of Inverness-shire the \"lands eastward of Altnalait, Knockravock and the Royal Burgh of Tain\", erected the Sherriffdom of Ross, and appointed the Marquiss of Argyll the Sherriff-Principal. Afterwards the commission was granted to Sir Robert Munro, who had been elected Member of Parliament for Inverness-shire in 1649 and for his own County of Ross after it was separated from the County of Inverness, 1649-50, to be Sheriff-Principal of the County of Ross. In 1651 Robert succeeded to the head of his house, upon the death of his cousin Sir Hector Munro, 2nd Baronet of Foulis who died at just 17 years of age, as already mentioned. Robert took up his residence in Foulis Castle."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many years apart did the name \"Sir Robert Munro, tutour of Foulles\" occur in a commission?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "1"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "On 26 August 1643, during the minority of the former chief, \"the Estates of the Kingdom passed an Act for the Committees of War in the shires of Scotland\", and among the Commissioners for the Sheriffdom of Sutherland and a par of Inverness-shire, occurs the name of \"Sir Robert Munro, tutour of Foulles\"; and again on 24 July 1644, in a commission for a similar purpose and for the same Sheriffdom is found the name of \"Sir Robert Monro, Tutor of Foullis\". In 1649, the Scottish Parliament separated from the Sherriffdom of Inverness-shire the \"lands eastward of Altnalait, Knockravock and the Royal Burgh of Tain\", erected the Sherriffdom of Ross, and appointed the Marquiss of Argyll the Sherriff-Principal. Afterwards the commission was granted to Sir Robert Munro, who had been elected Member of Parliament for Inverness-shire in 1649 and for his own County of Ross after it was separated from the County of Inverness, 1649-50, to be Sheriff-Principal of the County of Ross. In 1651 Robert succeeded to the head of his house, upon the death of his cousin Sir Hector Munro, 2nd Baronet of Foulis who died at just 17 years of age, as already mentioned. Robert took up his residence in Foulis Castle."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many days apart did the name \"Sir Robert Munro, tutour of Foulles\" occur in a commission?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "333"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "On 26 August 1643, during the minority of the former chief, \"the Estates of the Kingdom passed an Act for the Committees of War in the shires of Scotland\", and among the Commissioners for the Sheriffdom of Sutherland and a par of Inverness-shire, occurs the name of \"Sir Robert Munro, tutour of Foulles\"; and again on 24 July 1644, in a commission for a similar purpose and for the same Sheriffdom is found the name of \"Sir Robert Monro, Tutor of Foullis\". In 1649, the Scottish Parliament separated from the Sherriffdom of Inverness-shire the \"lands eastward of Altnalait, Knockravock and the Royal Burgh of Tain\", erected the Sherriffdom of Ross, and appointed the Marquiss of Argyll the Sherriff-Principal. Afterwards the commission was granted to Sir Robert Munro, who had been elected Member of Parliament for Inverness-shire in 1649 and for his own County of Ross after it was separated from the County of Inverness, 1649-50, to be Sheriff-Principal of the County of Ross. In 1651 Robert succeeded to the head of his house, upon the death of his cousin Sir Hector Munro, 2nd Baronet of Foulis who died at just 17 years of age, as already mentioned. Robert took up his residence in Foulis Castle."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many years after the second occurance of the name \"Sir Robert Munro, tutour of Foulles\" in a commission was he elected a Member of Parliment for Iverness-shire??"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "5"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Trying to rebound from two-straight losses, the Raiders flew to Arrowhead Stadium for a fierce AFC West fight with the Kansas City Chiefs. For this game, QB Aaron Brooks fully recovered from his earlier injuries and returned to the starting lineup. In the first quarter, Chiefs RB Larry Johnson got a 5-yard TD run, while the Raiders responded with kicker Sebastian Janikowski getting a 41-yard field goal. In the second quarter, Oakland had the Kansas City on the run with Janikowski kicking a 36-yard field goal and Brooks completing a 2-yard TD pass to TE Courtney Anderson. In the third quarter, the Chiefs came within three points with kicker Lawrence Tynes getting a 37-yard field goal for the only score of the period. In the fourth quarter, Johnson delivered the death blow with a 1-yard TD run. With the loss, the Raiders fell to 2-8."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many yards was the shortest field goal?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "36-yard"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Trying to rebound from two-straight losses, the Raiders flew to Arrowhead Stadium for a fierce AFC West fight with the Kansas City Chiefs. For this game, QB Aaron Brooks fully recovered from his earlier injuries and returned to the starting lineup. In the first quarter, Chiefs RB Larry Johnson got a 5-yard TD run, while the Raiders responded with kicker Sebastian Janikowski getting a 41-yard field goal. In the second quarter, Oakland had the Kansas City on the run with Janikowski kicking a 36-yard field goal and Brooks completing a 2-yard TD pass to TE Courtney Anderson. In the third quarter, the Chiefs came within three points with kicker Lawrence Tynes getting a 37-yard field goal for the only score of the period. In the fourth quarter, Johnson delivered the death blow with a 1-yard TD run. With the loss, the Raiders fell to 2-8."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "What team scored the last touchdown of the game?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Kansas City Chiefs"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Trying to rebound from two-straight losses, the Raiders flew to Arrowhead Stadium for a fierce AFC West fight with the Kansas City Chiefs. For this game, QB Aaron Brooks fully recovered from his earlier injuries and returned to the starting lineup. In the first quarter, Chiefs RB Larry Johnson got a 5-yard TD run, while the Raiders responded with kicker Sebastian Janikowski getting a 41-yard field goal. In the second quarter, Oakland had the Kansas City on the run with Janikowski kicking a 36-yard field goal and Brooks completing a 2-yard TD pass to TE Courtney Anderson. In the third quarter, the Chiefs came within three points with kicker Lawrence Tynes getting a 37-yard field goal for the only score of the period. In the fourth quarter, Johnson delivered the death blow with a 1-yard TD run. With the loss, the Raiders fell to 2-8."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "What team scored the first touchdown of the game?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Kansas City Chiefs"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Trying to rebound from two-straight losses, the Raiders flew to Arrowhead Stadium for a fierce AFC West fight with the Kansas City Chiefs. For this game, QB Aaron Brooks fully recovered from his earlier injuries and returned to the starting lineup. In the first quarter, Chiefs RB Larry Johnson got a 5-yard TD run, while the Raiders responded with kicker Sebastian Janikowski getting a 41-yard field goal. In the second quarter, Oakland had the Kansas City on the run with Janikowski kicking a 36-yard field goal and Brooks completing a 2-yard TD pass to TE Courtney Anderson. In the third quarter, the Chiefs came within three points with kicker Lawrence Tynes getting a 37-yard field goal for the only score of the period. In the fourth quarter, Johnson delivered the death blow with a 1-yard TD run. With the loss, the Raiders fell to 2-8."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many losses did the Raiders come into this game with??"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "7"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Trying to rebound from two-straight losses, the Raiders flew to Arrowhead Stadium for a fierce AFC West fight with the Kansas City Chiefs. For this game, QB Aaron Brooks fully recovered from his earlier injuries and returned to the starting lineup. In the first quarter, Chiefs RB Larry Johnson got a 5-yard TD run, while the Raiders responded with kicker Sebastian Janikowski getting a 41-yard field goal. In the second quarter, Oakland had the Kansas City on the run with Janikowski kicking a 36-yard field goal and Brooks completing a 2-yard TD pass to TE Courtney Anderson. In the third quarter, the Chiefs came within three points with kicker Lawrence Tynes getting a 37-yard field goal for the only score of the period. In the fourth quarter, Johnson delivered the death blow with a 1-yard TD run. With the loss, the Raiders fell to 2-8."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many field goals were scored in the third quarter?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "1"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Trying to rebound from two-straight losses, the Raiders flew to Arrowhead Stadium for a fierce AFC West fight with the Kansas City Chiefs. For this game, QB Aaron Brooks fully recovered from his earlier injuries and returned to the starting lineup. In the first quarter, Chiefs RB Larry Johnson got a 5-yard TD run, while the Raiders responded with kicker Sebastian Janikowski getting a 41-yard field goal. In the second quarter, Oakland had the Kansas City on the run with Janikowski kicking a 36-yard field goal and Brooks completing a 2-yard TD pass to TE Courtney Anderson. In the third quarter, the Chiefs came within three points with kicker Lawrence Tynes getting a 37-yard field goal for the only score of the period. In the fourth quarter, Johnson delivered the death blow with a 1-yard TD run. With the loss, the Raiders fell to 2-8."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "What was Janikowski 's shortest field goal?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "36-yard"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Trying to rebound from two-straight losses, the Raiders flew to Arrowhead Stadium for a fierce AFC West fight with the Kansas City Chiefs. For this game, QB Aaron Brooks fully recovered from his earlier injuries and returned to the starting lineup. In the first quarter, Chiefs RB Larry Johnson got a 5-yard TD run, while the Raiders responded with kicker Sebastian Janikowski getting a 41-yard field goal. In the second quarter, Oakland had the Kansas City on the run with Janikowski kicking a 36-yard field goal and Brooks completing a 2-yard TD pass to TE Courtney Anderson. In the third quarter, the Chiefs came within three points with kicker Lawrence Tynes getting a 37-yard field goal for the only score of the period. In the fourth quarter, Johnson delivered the death blow with a 1-yard TD run. With the loss, the Raiders fell to 2-8."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many field goals did the Chiefs score all game?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "1"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Trying to rebound from two-straight losses, the Raiders flew to Arrowhead Stadium for a fierce AFC West fight with the Kansas City Chiefs. For this game, QB Aaron Brooks fully recovered from his earlier injuries and returned to the starting lineup. In the first quarter, Chiefs RB Larry Johnson got a 5-yard TD run, while the Raiders responded with kicker Sebastian Janikowski getting a 41-yard field goal. In the second quarter, Oakland had the Kansas City on the run with Janikowski kicking a 36-yard field goal and Brooks completing a 2-yard TD pass to TE Courtney Anderson. In the third quarter, the Chiefs came within three points with kicker Lawrence Tynes getting a 37-yard field goal for the only score of the period. In the fourth quarter, Johnson delivered the death blow with a 1-yard TD run. With the loss, the Raiders fell to 2-8."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many yards shorter was Sebastian Janikowski's second field goal compared to his first?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "5"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Trying to rebound from two-straight losses, the Raiders flew to Arrowhead Stadium for a fierce AFC West fight with the Kansas City Chiefs. For this game, QB Aaron Brooks fully recovered from his earlier injuries and returned to the starting lineup. In the first quarter, Chiefs RB Larry Johnson got a 5-yard TD run, while the Raiders responded with kicker Sebastian Janikowski getting a 41-yard field goal. In the second quarter, Oakland had the Kansas City on the run with Janikowski kicking a 36-yard field goal and Brooks completing a 2-yard TD pass to TE Courtney Anderson. In the third quarter, the Chiefs came within three points with kicker Lawrence Tynes getting a 37-yard field goal for the only score of the period. In the fourth quarter, Johnson delivered the death blow with a 1-yard TD run. With the loss, the Raiders fell to 2-8."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which players scored field goals longer than 36-yard yards?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Sebastian Janikowski"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Trying to rebound from two-straight losses, the Raiders flew to Arrowhead Stadium for a fierce AFC West fight with the Kansas City Chiefs. For this game, QB Aaron Brooks fully recovered from his earlier injuries and returned to the starting lineup. In the first quarter, Chiefs RB Larry Johnson got a 5-yard TD run, while the Raiders responded with kicker Sebastian Janikowski getting a 41-yard field goal. In the second quarter, Oakland had the Kansas City on the run with Janikowski kicking a 36-yard field goal and Brooks completing a 2-yard TD pass to TE Courtney Anderson. In the third quarter, the Chiefs came within three points with kicker Lawrence Tynes getting a 37-yard field goal for the only score of the period. In the fourth quarter, Johnson delivered the death blow with a 1-yard TD run. With the loss, the Raiders fell to 2-8."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which player scored the second longest touchdown run?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Larry Johnson"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Trying to rebound from two-straight losses, the Raiders flew to Arrowhead Stadium for a fierce AFC West fight with the Kansas City Chiefs. For this game, QB Aaron Brooks fully recovered from his earlier injuries and returned to the starting lineup. In the first quarter, Chiefs RB Larry Johnson got a 5-yard TD run, while the Raiders responded with kicker Sebastian Janikowski getting a 41-yard field goal. In the second quarter, Oakland had the Kansas City on the run with Janikowski kicking a 36-yard field goal and Brooks completing a 2-yard TD pass to TE Courtney Anderson. In the third quarter, the Chiefs came within three points with kicker Lawrence Tynes getting a 37-yard field goal for the only score of the period. In the fourth quarter, Johnson delivered the death blow with a 1-yard TD run. With the loss, the Raiders fell to 2-8."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many total field goal yards did Sebastian Janikowski kick?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "77"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Trying to rebound from two-straight losses, the Raiders flew to Arrowhead Stadium for a fierce AFC West fight with the Kansas City Chiefs. For this game, QB Aaron Brooks fully recovered from his earlier injuries and returned to the starting lineup. In the first quarter, Chiefs RB Larry Johnson got a 5-yard TD run, while the Raiders responded with kicker Sebastian Janikowski getting a 41-yard field goal. In the second quarter, Oakland had the Kansas City on the run with Janikowski kicking a 36-yard field goal and Brooks completing a 2-yard TD pass to TE Courtney Anderson. In the third quarter, the Chiefs came within three points with kicker Lawrence Tynes getting a 37-yard field goal for the only score of the period. In the fourth quarter, Johnson delivered the death blow with a 1-yard TD run. With the loss, the Raiders fell to 2-8."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many field goals between 20 and 40 yards were scored?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "2"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Trying to rebound from two-straight losses, the Raiders flew to Arrowhead Stadium for a fierce AFC West fight with the Kansas City Chiefs. For this game, QB Aaron Brooks fully recovered from his earlier injuries and returned to the starting lineup. In the first quarter, Chiefs RB Larry Johnson got a 5-yard TD run, while the Raiders responded with kicker Sebastian Janikowski getting a 41-yard field goal. In the second quarter, Oakland had the Kansas City on the run with Janikowski kicking a 36-yard field goal and Brooks completing a 2-yard TD pass to TE Courtney Anderson. In the third quarter, the Chiefs came within three points with kicker Lawrence Tynes getting a 37-yard field goal for the only score of the period. In the fourth quarter, Johnson delivered the death blow with a 1-yard TD run. With the loss, the Raiders fell to 2-8."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which player kicked the second longest field goal?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Lawrence Tynes"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Trying to rebound from two-straight losses, the Raiders flew to Arrowhead Stadium for a fierce AFC West fight with the Kansas City Chiefs. For this game, QB Aaron Brooks fully recovered from his earlier injuries and returned to the starting lineup. In the first quarter, Chiefs RB Larry Johnson got a 5-yard TD run, while the Raiders responded with kicker Sebastian Janikowski getting a 41-yard field goal. In the second quarter, Oakland had the Kansas City on the run with Janikowski kicking a 36-yard field goal and Brooks completing a 2-yard TD pass to TE Courtney Anderson. In the third quarter, the Chiefs came within three points with kicker Lawrence Tynes getting a 37-yard field goal for the only score of the period. In the fourth quarter, Johnson delivered the death blow with a 1-yard TD run. With the loss, the Raiders fell to 2-8."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which player scored more field goals, Sebastian Janikowski or Lawrence Tynes?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Sebastian Janikowski"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Trying to rebound from two-straight losses, the Raiders flew to Arrowhead Stadium for a fierce AFC West fight with the Kansas City Chiefs. For this game, QB Aaron Brooks fully recovered from his earlier injuries and returned to the starting lineup. In the first quarter, Chiefs RB Larry Johnson got a 5-yard TD run, while the Raiders responded with kicker Sebastian Janikowski getting a 41-yard field goal. In the second quarter, Oakland had the Kansas City on the run with Janikowski kicking a 36-yard field goal and Brooks completing a 2-yard TD pass to TE Courtney Anderson. In the third quarter, the Chiefs came within three points with kicker Lawrence Tynes getting a 37-yard field goal for the only score of the period. In the fourth quarter, Johnson delivered the death blow with a 1-yard TD run. With the loss, the Raiders fell to 2-8."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many touchdowns did Larry Johnson score?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "2"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Trying to rebound from two-straight losses, the Raiders flew to Arrowhead Stadium for a fierce AFC West fight with the Kansas City Chiefs. For this game, QB Aaron Brooks fully recovered from his earlier injuries and returned to the starting lineup. In the first quarter, Chiefs RB Larry Johnson got a 5-yard TD run, while the Raiders responded with kicker Sebastian Janikowski getting a 41-yard field goal. In the second quarter, Oakland had the Kansas City on the run with Janikowski kicking a 36-yard field goal and Brooks completing a 2-yard TD pass to TE Courtney Anderson. In the third quarter, the Chiefs came within three points with kicker Lawrence Tynes getting a 37-yard field goal for the only score of the period. In the fourth quarter, Johnson delivered the death blow with a 1-yard TD run. With the loss, the Raiders fell to 2-8."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many yards shorter was Sebastian Janikowski's second touchdown run compared to his first?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "4"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Trying to rebound from two-straight losses, the Raiders flew to Arrowhead Stadium for a fierce AFC West fight with the Kansas City Chiefs. For this game, QB Aaron Brooks fully recovered from his earlier injuries and returned to the starting lineup. In the first quarter, Chiefs RB Larry Johnson got a 5-yard TD run, while the Raiders responded with kicker Sebastian Janikowski getting a 41-yard field goal. In the second quarter, Oakland had the Kansas City on the run with Janikowski kicking a 36-yard field goal and Brooks completing a 2-yard TD pass to TE Courtney Anderson. In the third quarter, the Chiefs came within three points with kicker Lawrence Tynes getting a 37-yard field goal for the only score of the period. In the fourth quarter, Johnson delivered the death blow with a 1-yard TD run. With the loss, the Raiders fell to 2-8."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many field goals between 30 and 40 yards were made?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "2"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Trying to rebound from two-straight losses, the Raiders flew to Arrowhead Stadium for a fierce AFC West fight with the Kansas City Chiefs. For this game, QB Aaron Brooks fully recovered from his earlier injuries and returned to the starting lineup. In the first quarter, Chiefs RB Larry Johnson got a 5-yard TD run, while the Raiders responded with kicker Sebastian Janikowski getting a 41-yard field goal. In the second quarter, Oakland had the Kansas City on the run with Janikowski kicking a 36-yard field goal and Brooks completing a 2-yard TD pass to TE Courtney Anderson. In the third quarter, the Chiefs came within three points with kicker Lawrence Tynes getting a 37-yard field goal for the only score of the period. In the fourth quarter, Johnson delivered the death blow with a 1-yard TD run. With the loss, the Raiders fell to 2-8."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Who made the only score in the fourth quarter?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Larry Johnson"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Trying to rebound from two-straight losses, the Raiders flew to Arrowhead Stadium for a fierce AFC West fight with the Kansas City Chiefs. For this game, QB Aaron Brooks fully recovered from his earlier injuries and returned to the starting lineup. In the first quarter, Chiefs RB Larry Johnson got a 5-yard TD run, while the Raiders responded with kicker Sebastian Janikowski getting a 41-yard field goal. In the second quarter, Oakland had the Kansas City on the run with Janikowski kicking a 36-yard field goal and Brooks completing a 2-yard TD pass to TE Courtney Anderson. In the third quarter, the Chiefs came within three points with kicker Lawrence Tynes getting a 37-yard field goal for the only score of the period. In the fourth quarter, Johnson delivered the death blow with a 1-yard TD run. With the loss, the Raiders fell to 2-8."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "What was the shortest TD run?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "1-yard"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The army defending Constantinople was relatively small, totaling about 7,000 men, 2,000 of whom were foreigners. At the onset of the siege, probably fewer than 50,000 people were living within the walls, including the refugees from the surrounding area.:32 Turkish commander Dorgano, who was in Constantinople in the pay of the Emperor, was also guarding one of the quarters of the city on the seaward side with the Turks in his pay. These Turks kept loyal to the Emperor and perished in the ensuing battle. The defending army's Genoese corps were well trained and equipped, while the rest of the army consisted of small numbers of well-trained soldiers, armed civilians, sailors and volunteer forces from foreign communities, and finally monks. The garrison used a few small-calibre artillery pieces, which nonetheless proved ineffective. The rest of the city repaired walls, stood guard on observation posts, collected and distributed food provisions, and collected gold and silver objects from churches to melt down into coins to pay the foreign soldiers. The Ottomans had a much larger force. Recent studies and Ottoman archival data state that there were about 50,000-80,000 Ottoman soldiers including between 5,000 and 10,000 Janissaries, *70 cannons:139-140 an elite infantry corps, and thousands of Christian troops, notably 1,500 Serbian cavalry that the Serbian lord Đurađ Branković was forced to supply as part of his obligation to the Ottoman sultan—just a few months before, he had supplied the money for the reconstruction of the walls of Constantinople. Contemporaneous Western witnesses of the siege, who tend to exaggerate the military power of the Sultan, provide disparate and higher numbers ranging from 160,000 to 200,000 and to 300,000."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many people in the army defending Constantinople was there?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "7000"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The army defending Constantinople was relatively small, totaling about 7,000 men, 2,000 of whom were foreigners. At the onset of the siege, probably fewer than 50,000 people were living within the walls, including the refugees from the surrounding area.:32 Turkish commander Dorgano, who was in Constantinople in the pay of the Emperor, was also guarding one of the quarters of the city on the seaward side with the Turks in his pay. These Turks kept loyal to the Emperor and perished in the ensuing battle. The defending army's Genoese corps were well trained and equipped, while the rest of the army consisted of small numbers of well-trained soldiers, armed civilians, sailors and volunteer forces from foreign communities, and finally monks. The garrison used a few small-calibre artillery pieces, which nonetheless proved ineffective. The rest of the city repaired walls, stood guard on observation posts, collected and distributed food provisions, and collected gold and silver objects from churches to melt down into coins to pay the foreign soldiers. The Ottomans had a much larger force. Recent studies and Ottoman archival data state that there were about 50,000-80,000 Ottoman soldiers including between 5,000 and 10,000 Janissaries, *70 cannons:139-140 an elite infantry corps, and thousands of Christian troops, notably 1,500 Serbian cavalry that the Serbian lord Đurađ Branković was forced to supply as part of his obligation to the Ottoman sultan—just a few months before, he had supplied the money for the reconstruction of the walls of Constantinople. Contemporaneous Western witnesses of the siege, who tend to exaggerate the military power of the Sultan, provide disparate and higher numbers ranging from 160,000 to 200,000 and to 300,000."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many were foreigners in the army defending Constantinople?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "2000"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The army defending Constantinople was relatively small, totaling about 7,000 men, 2,000 of whom were foreigners. At the onset of the siege, probably fewer than 50,000 people were living within the walls, including the refugees from the surrounding area.:32 Turkish commander Dorgano, who was in Constantinople in the pay of the Emperor, was also guarding one of the quarters of the city on the seaward side with the Turks in his pay. These Turks kept loyal to the Emperor and perished in the ensuing battle. The defending army's Genoese corps were well trained and equipped, while the rest of the army consisted of small numbers of well-trained soldiers, armed civilians, sailors and volunteer forces from foreign communities, and finally monks. The garrison used a few small-calibre artillery pieces, which nonetheless proved ineffective. The rest of the city repaired walls, stood guard on observation posts, collected and distributed food provisions, and collected gold and silver objects from churches to melt down into coins to pay the foreign soldiers. The Ottomans had a much larger force. Recent studies and Ottoman archival data state that there were about 50,000-80,000 Ottoman soldiers including between 5,000 and 10,000 Janissaries, *70 cannons:139-140 an elite infantry corps, and thousands of Christian troops, notably 1,500 Serbian cavalry that the Serbian lord Đurađ Branković was forced to supply as part of his obligation to the Ottoman sultan—just a few months before, he had supplied the money for the reconstruction of the walls of Constantinople. Contemporaneous Western witnesses of the siege, who tend to exaggerate the military power of the Sultan, provide disparate and higher numbers ranging from 160,000 to 200,000 and to 300,000."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many more men of the army defending Constantinople were from there, rather than foreigners?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "5000"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The army defending Constantinople was relatively small, totaling about 7,000 men, 2,000 of whom were foreigners. At the onset of the siege, probably fewer than 50,000 people were living within the walls, including the refugees from the surrounding area.:32 Turkish commander Dorgano, who was in Constantinople in the pay of the Emperor, was also guarding one of the quarters of the city on the seaward side with the Turks in his pay. These Turks kept loyal to the Emperor and perished in the ensuing battle. The defending army's Genoese corps were well trained and equipped, while the rest of the army consisted of small numbers of well-trained soldiers, armed civilians, sailors and volunteer forces from foreign communities, and finally monks. The garrison used a few small-calibre artillery pieces, which nonetheless proved ineffective. The rest of the city repaired walls, stood guard on observation posts, collected and distributed food provisions, and collected gold and silver objects from churches to melt down into coins to pay the foreign soldiers. The Ottomans had a much larger force. Recent studies and Ottoman archival data state that there were about 50,000-80,000 Ottoman soldiers including between 5,000 and 10,000 Janissaries, *70 cannons:139-140 an elite infantry corps, and thousands of Christian troops, notably 1,500 Serbian cavalry that the Serbian lord Đurađ Branković was forced to supply as part of his obligation to the Ottoman sultan—just a few months before, he had supplied the money for the reconstruction of the walls of Constantinople. Contemporaneous Western witnesses of the siege, who tend to exaggerate the military power of the Sultan, provide disparate and higher numbers ranging from 160,000 to 200,000 and to 300,000."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many groups made up the Genoese corps?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "5"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The army defending Constantinople was relatively small, totaling about 7,000 men, 2,000 of whom were foreigners. At the onset of the siege, probably fewer than 50,000 people were living within the walls, including the refugees from the surrounding area.:32 Turkish commander Dorgano, who was in Constantinople in the pay of the Emperor, was also guarding one of the quarters of the city on the seaward side with the Turks in his pay. These Turks kept loyal to the Emperor and perished in the ensuing battle. The defending army's Genoese corps were well trained and equipped, while the rest of the army consisted of small numbers of well-trained soldiers, armed civilians, sailors and volunteer forces from foreign communities, and finally monks. The garrison used a few small-calibre artillery pieces, which nonetheless proved ineffective. The rest of the city repaired walls, stood guard on observation posts, collected and distributed food provisions, and collected gold and silver objects from churches to melt down into coins to pay the foreign soldiers. The Ottomans had a much larger force. Recent studies and Ottoman archival data state that there were about 50,000-80,000 Ottoman soldiers including between 5,000 and 10,000 Janissaries, *70 cannons:139-140 an elite infantry corps, and thousands of Christian troops, notably 1,500 Serbian cavalry that the Serbian lord Đurađ Branković was forced to supply as part of his obligation to the Ottoman sultan—just a few months before, he had supplied the money for the reconstruction of the walls of Constantinople. Contemporaneous Western witnesses of the siege, who tend to exaggerate the military power of the Sultan, provide disparate and higher numbers ranging from 160,000 to 200,000 and to 300,000."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which force was larger, the Genoese corps or the Ottomans?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Ottomans"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The army defending Constantinople was relatively small, totaling about 7,000 men, 2,000 of whom were foreigners. At the onset of the siege, probably fewer than 50,000 people were living within the walls, including the refugees from the surrounding area.:32 Turkish commander Dorgano, who was in Constantinople in the pay of the Emperor, was also guarding one of the quarters of the city on the seaward side with the Turks in his pay. These Turks kept loyal to the Emperor and perished in the ensuing battle. The defending army's Genoese corps were well trained and equipped, while the rest of the army consisted of small numbers of well-trained soldiers, armed civilians, sailors and volunteer forces from foreign communities, and finally monks. The garrison used a few small-calibre artillery pieces, which nonetheless proved ineffective. The rest of the city repaired walls, stood guard on observation posts, collected and distributed food provisions, and collected gold and silver objects from churches to melt down into coins to pay the foreign soldiers. The Ottomans had a much larger force. Recent studies and Ottoman archival data state that there were about 50,000-80,000 Ottoman soldiers including between 5,000 and 10,000 Janissaries, *70 cannons:139-140 an elite infantry corps, and thousands of Christian troops, notably 1,500 Serbian cavalry that the Serbian lord Đurađ Branković was forced to supply as part of his obligation to the Ottoman sultan—just a few months before, he had supplied the money for the reconstruction of the walls of Constantinople. Contemporaneous Western witnesses of the siege, who tend to exaggerate the military power of the Sultan, provide disparate and higher numbers ranging from 160,000 to 200,000 and to 300,000."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which comprised a larger amount of the Otooman force - soldiers or Janissaries?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "soldiers"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The army defending Constantinople was relatively small, totaling about 7,000 men, 2,000 of whom were foreigners. At the onset of the siege, probably fewer than 50,000 people were living within the walls, including the refugees from the surrounding area.:32 Turkish commander Dorgano, who was in Constantinople in the pay of the Emperor, was also guarding one of the quarters of the city on the seaward side with the Turks in his pay. These Turks kept loyal to the Emperor and perished in the ensuing battle. The defending army's Genoese corps were well trained and equipped, while the rest of the army consisted of small numbers of well-trained soldiers, armed civilians, sailors and volunteer forces from foreign communities, and finally monks. The garrison used a few small-calibre artillery pieces, which nonetheless proved ineffective. The rest of the city repaired walls, stood guard on observation posts, collected and distributed food provisions, and collected gold and silver objects from churches to melt down into coins to pay the foreign soldiers. The Ottomans had a much larger force. Recent studies and Ottoman archival data state that there were about 50,000-80,000 Ottoman soldiers including between 5,000 and 10,000 Janissaries, *70 cannons:139-140 an elite infantry corps, and thousands of Christian troops, notably 1,500 Serbian cavalry that the Serbian lord Đurađ Branković was forced to supply as part of his obligation to the Ottoman sultan—just a few months before, he had supplied the money for the reconstruction of the walls of Constantinople. Contemporaneous Western witnesses of the siege, who tend to exaggerate the military power of the Sultan, provide disparate and higher numbers ranging from 160,000 to 200,000 and to 300,000."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many small numbers groups of the army were there?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "4"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The army defending Constantinople was relatively small, totaling about 7,000 men, 2,000 of whom were foreigners. At the onset of the siege, probably fewer than 50,000 people were living within the walls, including the refugees from the surrounding area.:32 Turkish commander Dorgano, who was in Constantinople in the pay of the Emperor, was also guarding one of the quarters of the city on the seaward side with the Turks in his pay. These Turks kept loyal to the Emperor and perished in the ensuing battle. The defending army's Genoese corps were well trained and equipped, while the rest of the army consisted of small numbers of well-trained soldiers, armed civilians, sailors and volunteer forces from foreign communities, and finally monks. The garrison used a few small-calibre artillery pieces, which nonetheless proved ineffective. The rest of the city repaired walls, stood guard on observation posts, collected and distributed food provisions, and collected gold and silver objects from churches to melt down into coins to pay the foreign soldiers. The Ottomans had a much larger force. Recent studies and Ottoman archival data state that there were about 50,000-80,000 Ottoman soldiers including between 5,000 and 10,000 Janissaries, *70 cannons:139-140 an elite infantry corps, and thousands of Christian troops, notably 1,500 Serbian cavalry that the Serbian lord Đurađ Branković was forced to supply as part of his obligation to the Ottoman sultan—just a few months before, he had supplied the money for the reconstruction of the walls of Constantinople. Contemporaneous Western witnesses of the siege, who tend to exaggerate the military power of the Sultan, provide disparate and higher numbers ranging from 160,000 to 200,000 and to 300,000."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Who had the largest group of fighters?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Sultan"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The army defending Constantinople was relatively small, totaling about 7,000 men, 2,000 of whom were foreigners. At the onset of the siege, probably fewer than 50,000 people were living within the walls, including the refugees from the surrounding area.:32 Turkish commander Dorgano, who was in Constantinople in the pay of the Emperor, was also guarding one of the quarters of the city on the seaward side with the Turks in his pay. These Turks kept loyal to the Emperor and perished in the ensuing battle. The defending army's Genoese corps were well trained and equipped, while the rest of the army consisted of small numbers of well-trained soldiers, armed civilians, sailors and volunteer forces from foreign communities, and finally monks. The garrison used a few small-calibre artillery pieces, which nonetheless proved ineffective. The rest of the city repaired walls, stood guard on observation posts, collected and distributed food provisions, and collected gold and silver objects from churches to melt down into coins to pay the foreign soldiers. The Ottomans had a much larger force. Recent studies and Ottoman archival data state that there were about 50,000-80,000 Ottoman soldiers including between 5,000 and 10,000 Janissaries, *70 cannons:139-140 an elite infantry corps, and thousands of Christian troops, notably 1,500 Serbian cavalry that the Serbian lord Đurađ Branković was forced to supply as part of his obligation to the Ottoman sultan—just a few months before, he had supplied the money for the reconstruction of the walls of Constantinople. Contemporaneous Western witnesses of the siege, who tend to exaggerate the military power of the Sultan, provide disparate and higher numbers ranging from 160,000 to 200,000 and to 300,000."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which force was smaller, the Turkish or the Ottomans?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Turkish"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The army defending Constantinople was relatively small, totaling about 7,000 men, 2,000 of whom were foreigners. At the onset of the siege, probably fewer than 50,000 people were living within the walls, including the refugees from the surrounding area.:32 Turkish commander Dorgano, who was in Constantinople in the pay of the Emperor, was also guarding one of the quarters of the city on the seaward side with the Turks in his pay. These Turks kept loyal to the Emperor and perished in the ensuing battle. The defending army's Genoese corps were well trained and equipped, while the rest of the army consisted of small numbers of well-trained soldiers, armed civilians, sailors and volunteer forces from foreign communities, and finally monks. The garrison used a few small-calibre artillery pieces, which nonetheless proved ineffective. The rest of the city repaired walls, stood guard on observation posts, collected and distributed food provisions, and collected gold and silver objects from churches to melt down into coins to pay the foreign soldiers. The Ottomans had a much larger force. Recent studies and Ottoman archival data state that there were about 50,000-80,000 Ottoman soldiers including between 5,000 and 10,000 Janissaries, *70 cannons:139-140 an elite infantry corps, and thousands of Christian troops, notably 1,500 Serbian cavalry that the Serbian lord Đurađ Branković was forced to supply as part of his obligation to the Ottoman sultan—just a few months before, he had supplied the money for the reconstruction of the walls of Constantinople. Contemporaneous Western witnesses of the siege, who tend to exaggerate the military power of the Sultan, provide disparate and higher numbers ranging from 160,000 to 200,000 and to 300,000."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many men in the army defending Constantinople were not foreigners?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "5000"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The army defending Constantinople was relatively small, totaling about 7,000 men, 2,000 of whom were foreigners. At the onset of the siege, probably fewer than 50,000 people were living within the walls, including the refugees from the surrounding area.:32 Turkish commander Dorgano, who was in Constantinople in the pay of the Emperor, was also guarding one of the quarters of the city on the seaward side with the Turks in his pay. These Turks kept loyal to the Emperor and perished in the ensuing battle. The defending army's Genoese corps were well trained and equipped, while the rest of the army consisted of small numbers of well-trained soldiers, armed civilians, sailors and volunteer forces from foreign communities, and finally monks. The garrison used a few small-calibre artillery pieces, which nonetheless proved ineffective. The rest of the city repaired walls, stood guard on observation posts, collected and distributed food provisions, and collected gold and silver objects from churches to melt down into coins to pay the foreign soldiers. The Ottomans had a much larger force. Recent studies and Ottoman archival data state that there were about 50,000-80,000 Ottoman soldiers including between 5,000 and 10,000 Janissaries, *70 cannons:139-140 an elite infantry corps, and thousands of Christian troops, notably 1,500 Serbian cavalry that the Serbian lord Đurađ Branković was forced to supply as part of his obligation to the Ottoman sultan—just a few months before, he had supplied the money for the reconstruction of the walls of Constantinople. Contemporaneous Western witnesses of the siege, who tend to exaggerate the military power of the Sultan, provide disparate and higher numbers ranging from 160,000 to 200,000 and to 300,000."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many of the army defending Constantinople were not foreigners?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "5000"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The army defending Constantinople was relatively small, totaling about 7,000 men, 2,000 of whom were foreigners. At the onset of the siege, probably fewer than 50,000 people were living within the walls, including the refugees from the surrounding area.:32 Turkish commander Dorgano, who was in Constantinople in the pay of the Emperor, was also guarding one of the quarters of the city on the seaward side with the Turks in his pay. These Turks kept loyal to the Emperor and perished in the ensuing battle. The defending army's Genoese corps were well trained and equipped, while the rest of the army consisted of small numbers of well-trained soldiers, armed civilians, sailors and volunteer forces from foreign communities, and finally monks. The garrison used a few small-calibre artillery pieces, which nonetheless proved ineffective. The rest of the city repaired walls, stood guard on observation posts, collected and distributed food provisions, and collected gold and silver objects from churches to melt down into coins to pay the foreign soldiers. The Ottomans had a much larger force. Recent studies and Ottoman archival data state that there were about 50,000-80,000 Ottoman soldiers including between 5,000 and 10,000 Janissaries, *70 cannons:139-140 an elite infantry corps, and thousands of Christian troops, notably 1,500 Serbian cavalry that the Serbian lord Đurađ Branković was forced to supply as part of his obligation to the Ottoman sultan—just a few months before, he had supplied the money for the reconstruction of the walls of Constantinople. Contemporaneous Western witnesses of the siege, who tend to exaggerate the military power of the Sultan, provide disparate and higher numbers ranging from 160,000 to 200,000 and to 300,000."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many more is the maximum estimate of the number of Janissaries than Serbian cavalry?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "8500"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The army defending Constantinople was relatively small, totaling about 7,000 men, 2,000 of whom were foreigners. At the onset of the siege, probably fewer than 50,000 people were living within the walls, including the refugees from the surrounding area.:32 Turkish commander Dorgano, who was in Constantinople in the pay of the Emperor, was also guarding one of the quarters of the city on the seaward side with the Turks in his pay. These Turks kept loyal to the Emperor and perished in the ensuing battle. The defending army's Genoese corps were well trained and equipped, while the rest of the army consisted of small numbers of well-trained soldiers, armed civilians, sailors and volunteer forces from foreign communities, and finally monks. The garrison used a few small-calibre artillery pieces, which nonetheless proved ineffective. The rest of the city repaired walls, stood guard on observation posts, collected and distributed food provisions, and collected gold and silver objects from churches to melt down into coins to pay the foreign soldiers. The Ottomans had a much larger force. Recent studies and Ottoman archival data state that there were about 50,000-80,000 Ottoman soldiers including between 5,000 and 10,000 Janissaries, *70 cannons:139-140 an elite infantry corps, and thousands of Christian troops, notably 1,500 Serbian cavalry that the Serbian lord Đurađ Branković was forced to supply as part of his obligation to the Ottoman sultan—just a few months before, he had supplied the money for the reconstruction of the walls of Constantinople. Contemporaneous Western witnesses of the siege, who tend to exaggerate the military power of the Sultan, provide disparate and higher numbers ranging from 160,000 to 200,000 and to 300,000."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many is the difference between the highest modern estimate of the number of soldiers the Ottomans had vs maximum Ottoman archival estimates?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "220000"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "In the first game of an ESPN Monday Night Football opening doubleheader, the Patriots faced the Bills at home in an American Football League \"legacy game\" honoring the 50th anniversary of the founding of AFL, which added ten teams to the NFL as part of the 1970 AFL-NFL merger. As two of the eight founding teams of the AFL, the Bills and Patriots celebrated their 50th anniversaries by wearing throwback uniforms from the AFL era, while the officials also wore red-striped uniforms such as those worn by AFL officials. Following a Patriots three-and-out to open the game, the Bills punted to give the Patriots the ball at their own 17-yard line. Nine players later, the Patriots were unable to convert on third down, setting kicker Stephen Gostkowski up for a 41-yard field goal try. He missed it wide right, giving the Bills the ball at their own 32-yard line. Bills quarterback Trent Edwards scrambled for 16 yards to move the Bills into Patriots territory before a Fred Jackson run gained another 16 yards. Jackson was filling in for suspended starter Marshawn Lynch; Patriots linebacker and 2008 Defensive Rookie of the Year Jerod Mayo suffered a sprained MCL on the play and did not return. The next play, a dump-off pass to Jackson, gained 21 yards and put the Bills in the red zone. Two plays later, Edwards hit rookie tight end Shawn Nelson for an 11-yard touchdown, giving the Bills a 7-0 lead. The Patriots next drive was a three-and-out, ending on an Aaron Schobel sack of quarterback Tom Brady on third down. The Bills punted back to the Patriots early in the second quarter, setting the table for a 14-play, 72-yard Patriots drive that culminated on a 1-yard touchdown run by running back Fred Taylor to tie the game. Despite a 16-yard dump-off to Jackson on the Bills' next drive, they punted back to the Patriots before reaching midfield. On the very next play, a Brady pass intended for running back Sammy Morris was intercepted by Schobel and returned 26 yards for a touchdown, giving the Bills a 14-7 lead. Brady was more accurate on his next possession, throwing passes of 14 yards to tight end Benjamin Watson and wide receiver Wes Welker to move into Bills territory, and then hitting wide receiver Randy Moss on a 31-yard strike within the two-minute warning. The drive stalled in the Bills' red zone, and the Patriots were forced to settle for a 20-yard Gostkowski field goal as the first half expired, cutting the Bills' lead to 14-10. Aided by more Jackson yardage and a 15-yard roughing the passer penalty on Vince Wilfork, the Bills moved close to midfield on the opening drive of the second half before punting and pinning the Patriots at their own 3-yard line. The Patriots would advance to the Bills' 36-yard line on 12 plays, but an incomplete pass on third down set up a fourth down conversion try, which failed on another incomplete pass. Three plays later, Edwards hit new target Terrell Owens for the first time in the game, good for 27 yards to put the Bills in Patriots territory. However, a run for a loss and a Tully Banta-Cain sack of Edwards set up a 3rd-and-20 situation, where the Bills failed to convert, forcing a 40-yard Rian Lindell field goal. After a punt, the Patriots began an 11-play drive that spanned into the fourth quarter, ending it on a 28-yard Gostkowski field goal that cut the Bills' lead to 17-13. The Bills responded by embarking on a 14-play, 62-yard drive that took more than six minutes off the clock and extended the Bills' lead to 24-13 on a 10-yard Jackson touchdown on a dump-off from Edwards. With 5:25 remaining in the game and down by 11 points, the Patriots shifted into their two-minute, pass-only offense, moving the ball 81 yards on 11 plays in 3:26 and scoring on an 18-yard Watson touchdown pass from Brady. The Patriots' two-point conversion try failed, keeping them within five points of the Bills. On the ensuing kickoff, Bills second-year returner Leodis McKelvin chose to return the kickoff out of the end zone, despite having his team's onside kick return unit on the field. Safety Brandon Meriweather hit McKelvin at the Bills' 31-yard line, which allowed linebacker Pierre Woods to come in from the side and strip McKelvin of the ball. Gostkowski recovered it at the same spot. Following the two-minute warning, the Patriots offense came back out onto the field. On the third play of the drive, Brady hit Watson on a nearly identical end zone route for a 16-yard touchdown, which was upheld by official review. The Patriots two-point attempt failed again, holding their lead to one point over the Bills. With 45 seconds remaining, the Bills began their next drive and were able to reach their own 40-yard line before another Banta-Cain sack pushed them back to the 30-yard line. The next play was a last-minute deseperation multiple-lateral play that fell short for the Bills, giving the Patriots a 25-24 win, their first victory of the season."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many field goals did Stephen Gostkowski make from less than 40 yards?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "2"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "In the first game of an ESPN Monday Night Football opening doubleheader, the Patriots faced the Bills at home in an American Football League \"legacy game\" honoring the 50th anniversary of the founding of AFL, which added ten teams to the NFL as part of the 1970 AFL-NFL merger. As two of the eight founding teams of the AFL, the Bills and Patriots celebrated their 50th anniversaries by wearing throwback uniforms from the AFL era, while the officials also wore red-striped uniforms such as those worn by AFL officials. Following a Patriots three-and-out to open the game, the Bills punted to give the Patriots the ball at their own 17-yard line. Nine players later, the Patriots were unable to convert on third down, setting kicker Stephen Gostkowski up for a 41-yard field goal try. He missed it wide right, giving the Bills the ball at their own 32-yard line. Bills quarterback Trent Edwards scrambled for 16 yards to move the Bills into Patriots territory before a Fred Jackson run gained another 16 yards. Jackson was filling in for suspended starter Marshawn Lynch; Patriots linebacker and 2008 Defensive Rookie of the Year Jerod Mayo suffered a sprained MCL on the play and did not return. The next play, a dump-off pass to Jackson, gained 21 yards and put the Bills in the red zone. Two plays later, Edwards hit rookie tight end Shawn Nelson for an 11-yard touchdown, giving the Bills a 7-0 lead. The Patriots next drive was a three-and-out, ending on an Aaron Schobel sack of quarterback Tom Brady on third down. The Bills punted back to the Patriots early in the second quarter, setting the table for a 14-play, 72-yard Patriots drive that culminated on a 1-yard touchdown run by running back Fred Taylor to tie the game. Despite a 16-yard dump-off to Jackson on the Bills' next drive, they punted back to the Patriots before reaching midfield. On the very next play, a Brady pass intended for running back Sammy Morris was intercepted by Schobel and returned 26 yards for a touchdown, giving the Bills a 14-7 lead. Brady was more accurate on his next possession, throwing passes of 14 yards to tight end Benjamin Watson and wide receiver Wes Welker to move into Bills territory, and then hitting wide receiver Randy Moss on a 31-yard strike within the two-minute warning. The drive stalled in the Bills' red zone, and the Patriots were forced to settle for a 20-yard Gostkowski field goal as the first half expired, cutting the Bills' lead to 14-10. Aided by more Jackson yardage and a 15-yard roughing the passer penalty on Vince Wilfork, the Bills moved close to midfield on the opening drive of the second half before punting and pinning the Patriots at their own 3-yard line. The Patriots would advance to the Bills' 36-yard line on 12 plays, but an incomplete pass on third down set up a fourth down conversion try, which failed on another incomplete pass. Three plays later, Edwards hit new target Terrell Owens for the first time in the game, good for 27 yards to put the Bills in Patriots territory. However, a run for a loss and a Tully Banta-Cain sack of Edwards set up a 3rd-and-20 situation, where the Bills failed to convert, forcing a 40-yard Rian Lindell field goal. After a punt, the Patriots began an 11-play drive that spanned into the fourth quarter, ending it on a 28-yard Gostkowski field goal that cut the Bills' lead to 17-13. The Bills responded by embarking on a 14-play, 62-yard drive that took more than six minutes off the clock and extended the Bills' lead to 24-13 on a 10-yard Jackson touchdown on a dump-off from Edwards. With 5:25 remaining in the game and down by 11 points, the Patriots shifted into their two-minute, pass-only offense, moving the ball 81 yards on 11 plays in 3:26 and scoring on an 18-yard Watson touchdown pass from Brady. The Patriots' two-point conversion try failed, keeping them within five points of the Bills. On the ensuing kickoff, Bills second-year returner Leodis McKelvin chose to return the kickoff out of the end zone, despite having his team's onside kick return unit on the field. Safety Brandon Meriweather hit McKelvin at the Bills' 31-yard line, which allowed linebacker Pierre Woods to come in from the side and strip McKelvin of the ball. Gostkowski recovered it at the same spot. Following the two-minute warning, the Patriots offense came back out onto the field. On the third play of the drive, Brady hit Watson on a nearly identical end zone route for a 16-yard touchdown, which was upheld by official review. The Patriots two-point attempt failed again, holding their lead to one point over the Bills. With 45 seconds remaining, the Bills began their next drive and were able to reach their own 40-yard line before another Banta-Cain sack pushed them back to the 30-yard line. The next play was a last-minute deseperation multiple-lateral play that fell short for the Bills, giving the Patriots a 25-24 win, their first victory of the season."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many yards longer was the longest field goal over the second longest field goal?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "1"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "In the first game of an ESPN Monday Night Football opening doubleheader, the Patriots faced the Bills at home in an American Football League \"legacy game\" honoring the 50th anniversary of the founding of AFL, which added ten teams to the NFL as part of the 1970 AFL-NFL merger. As two of the eight founding teams of the AFL, the Bills and Patriots celebrated their 50th anniversaries by wearing throwback uniforms from the AFL era, while the officials also wore red-striped uniforms such as those worn by AFL officials. Following a Patriots three-and-out to open the game, the Bills punted to give the Patriots the ball at their own 17-yard line. Nine players later, the Patriots were unable to convert on third down, setting kicker Stephen Gostkowski up for a 41-yard field goal try. He missed it wide right, giving the Bills the ball at their own 32-yard line. Bills quarterback Trent Edwards scrambled for 16 yards to move the Bills into Patriots territory before a Fred Jackson run gained another 16 yards. Jackson was filling in for suspended starter Marshawn Lynch; Patriots linebacker and 2008 Defensive Rookie of the Year Jerod Mayo suffered a sprained MCL on the play and did not return. The next play, a dump-off pass to Jackson, gained 21 yards and put the Bills in the red zone. Two plays later, Edwards hit rookie tight end Shawn Nelson for an 11-yard touchdown, giving the Bills a 7-0 lead. The Patriots next drive was a three-and-out, ending on an Aaron Schobel sack of quarterback Tom Brady on third down. The Bills punted back to the Patriots early in the second quarter, setting the table for a 14-play, 72-yard Patriots drive that culminated on a 1-yard touchdown run by running back Fred Taylor to tie the game. Despite a 16-yard dump-off to Jackson on the Bills' next drive, they punted back to the Patriots before reaching midfield. On the very next play, a Brady pass intended for running back Sammy Morris was intercepted by Schobel and returned 26 yards for a touchdown, giving the Bills a 14-7 lead. Brady was more accurate on his next possession, throwing passes of 14 yards to tight end Benjamin Watson and wide receiver Wes Welker to move into Bills territory, and then hitting wide receiver Randy Moss on a 31-yard strike within the two-minute warning. The drive stalled in the Bills' red zone, and the Patriots were forced to settle for a 20-yard Gostkowski field goal as the first half expired, cutting the Bills' lead to 14-10. Aided by more Jackson yardage and a 15-yard roughing the passer penalty on Vince Wilfork, the Bills moved close to midfield on the opening drive of the second half before punting and pinning the Patriots at their own 3-yard line. The Patriots would advance to the Bills' 36-yard line on 12 plays, but an incomplete pass on third down set up a fourth down conversion try, which failed on another incomplete pass. Three plays later, Edwards hit new target Terrell Owens for the first time in the game, good for 27 yards to put the Bills in Patriots territory. However, a run for a loss and a Tully Banta-Cain sack of Edwards set up a 3rd-and-20 situation, where the Bills failed to convert, forcing a 40-yard Rian Lindell field goal. After a punt, the Patriots began an 11-play drive that spanned into the fourth quarter, ending it on a 28-yard Gostkowski field goal that cut the Bills' lead to 17-13. The Bills responded by embarking on a 14-play, 62-yard drive that took more than six minutes off the clock and extended the Bills' lead to 24-13 on a 10-yard Jackson touchdown on a dump-off from Edwards. With 5:25 remaining in the game and down by 11 points, the Patriots shifted into their two-minute, pass-only offense, moving the ball 81 yards on 11 plays in 3:26 and scoring on an 18-yard Watson touchdown pass from Brady. The Patriots' two-point conversion try failed, keeping them within five points of the Bills. On the ensuing kickoff, Bills second-year returner Leodis McKelvin chose to return the kickoff out of the end zone, despite having his team's onside kick return unit on the field. Safety Brandon Meriweather hit McKelvin at the Bills' 31-yard line, which allowed linebacker Pierre Woods to come in from the side and strip McKelvin of the ball. Gostkowski recovered it at the same spot. Following the two-minute warning, the Patriots offense came back out onto the field. On the third play of the drive, Brady hit Watson on a nearly identical end zone route for a 16-yard touchdown, which was upheld by official review. The Patriots two-point attempt failed again, holding their lead to one point over the Bills. With 45 seconds remaining, the Bills began their next drive and were able to reach their own 40-yard line before another Banta-Cain sack pushed them back to the 30-yard line. The next play was a last-minute deseperation multiple-lateral play that fell short for the Bills, giving the Patriots a 25-24 win, their first victory of the season."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "how many more wins than losses did the Pacers finish the season at?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "18"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The Texans and Patriots faced off on Sunday Night Football in a game with playoff implications for both teams. Houston received the opening kickoff, going into a three-and-out on the drive. On New England's second drive, Tom Brady found tight end Rob Gronkowski for a 40-yard reception to set up first and goal. To end the drive, Brady found Keshawn Martin for a 2-yard touchdown pass. With Stephen Gostkowski making the extra point the Patriots took a 7-0 lead. On 3rd and 18, Brian Hoyer found Nate Washington for a 49-yard pass to put Houston at New England's 25 yard line. The Texans ended the drive with a 37-yard field goal from Nick Novak to trail 3-7 late in the 1st quarter. The Patriots extended their lead early in the 2nd quarter to 10-3 with a 43-yard field goal from Stephen Gostkowski. After struggling to find their run game after the loss of Arian Foster, Jonathan Grimes took off for 37 yards to put the Texans at the Patriots' 43 yard line. The drive ended with another Novak field goal, this time from 45 yards. With Novak's kick good, Houston trailed 6-10 with 9:26 left in the half. To close out the first half, Tom Brady found Gronkowski for a 1-yard touchdown pass. With Gostkowski making the extra point New England extended their lead to 17-6 going into halftime. The Texans failed to score in the 2nd half, falling to the Patriots 27-6. Hoyer left the game late in the 4th quarter due to a possible concussion, with T. J. Yates coming in as the starting quarterback."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "how many yards was tom bradys reception?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "40"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The Texans and Patriots faced off on Sunday Night Football in a game with playoff implications for both teams. Houston received the opening kickoff, going into a three-and-out on the drive. On New England's second drive, Tom Brady found tight end Rob Gronkowski for a 40-yard reception to set up first and goal. To end the drive, Brady found Keshawn Martin for a 2-yard touchdown pass. With Stephen Gostkowski making the extra point the Patriots took a 7-0 lead. On 3rd and 18, Brian Hoyer found Nate Washington for a 49-yard pass to put Houston at New England's 25 yard line. The Texans ended the drive with a 37-yard field goal from Nick Novak to trail 3-7 late in the 1st quarter. The Patriots extended their lead early in the 2nd quarter to 10-3 with a 43-yard field goal from Stephen Gostkowski. After struggling to find their run game after the loss of Arian Foster, Jonathan Grimes took off for 37 yards to put the Texans at the Patriots' 43 yard line. The drive ended with another Novak field goal, this time from 45 yards. With Novak's kick good, Houston trailed 6-10 with 9:26 left in the half. To close out the first half, Tom Brady found Gronkowski for a 1-yard touchdown pass. With Gostkowski making the extra point New England extended their lead to 17-6 going into halftime. The Texans failed to score in the 2nd half, falling to the Patriots 27-6. Hoyer left the game late in the 4th quarter due to a possible concussion, with T. J. Yates coming in as the starting quarterback."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many points did the patriots win by?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "27"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The Texans and Patriots faced off on Sunday Night Football in a game with playoff implications for both teams. Houston received the opening kickoff, going into a three-and-out on the drive. On New England's second drive, Tom Brady found tight end Rob Gronkowski for a 40-yard reception to set up first and goal. To end the drive, Brady found Keshawn Martin for a 2-yard touchdown pass. With Stephen Gostkowski making the extra point the Patriots took a 7-0 lead. On 3rd and 18, Brian Hoyer found Nate Washington for a 49-yard pass to put Houston at New England's 25 yard line. The Texans ended the drive with a 37-yard field goal from Nick Novak to trail 3-7 late in the 1st quarter. The Patriots extended their lead early in the 2nd quarter to 10-3 with a 43-yard field goal from Stephen Gostkowski. After struggling to find their run game after the loss of Arian Foster, Jonathan Grimes took off for 37 yards to put the Texans at the Patriots' 43 yard line. The drive ended with another Novak field goal, this time from 45 yards. With Novak's kick good, Houston trailed 6-10 with 9:26 left in the half. To close out the first half, Tom Brady found Gronkowski for a 1-yard touchdown pass. With Gostkowski making the extra point New England extended their lead to 17-6 going into halftime. The Texans failed to score in the 2nd half, falling to the Patriots 27-6. Hoyer left the game late in the 4th quarter due to a possible concussion, with T. J. Yates coming in as the starting quarterback."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many yards was the shortest field goal?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "37-yard"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The Texans and Patriots faced off on Sunday Night Football in a game with playoff implications for both teams. Houston received the opening kickoff, going into a three-and-out on the drive. On New England's second drive, Tom Brady found tight end Rob Gronkowski for a 40-yard reception to set up first and goal. To end the drive, Brady found Keshawn Martin for a 2-yard touchdown pass. With Stephen Gostkowski making the extra point the Patriots took a 7-0 lead. On 3rd and 18, Brian Hoyer found Nate Washington for a 49-yard pass to put Houston at New England's 25 yard line. The Texans ended the drive with a 37-yard field goal from Nick Novak to trail 3-7 late in the 1st quarter. The Patriots extended their lead early in the 2nd quarter to 10-3 with a 43-yard field goal from Stephen Gostkowski. After struggling to find their run game after the loss of Arian Foster, Jonathan Grimes took off for 37 yards to put the Texans at the Patriots' 43 yard line. The drive ended with another Novak field goal, this time from 45 yards. With Novak's kick good, Houston trailed 6-10 with 9:26 left in the half. To close out the first half, Tom Brady found Gronkowski for a 1-yard touchdown pass. With Gostkowski making the extra point New England extended their lead to 17-6 going into halftime. The Texans failed to score in the 2nd half, falling to the Patriots 27-6. Hoyer left the game late in the 4th quarter due to a possible concussion, with T. J. Yates coming in as the starting quarterback."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many points in total were scored?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "33"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The Texans and Patriots faced off on Sunday Night Football in a game with playoff implications for both teams. Houston received the opening kickoff, going into a three-and-out on the drive. On New England's second drive, Tom Brady found tight end Rob Gronkowski for a 40-yard reception to set up first and goal. To end the drive, Brady found Keshawn Martin for a 2-yard touchdown pass. With Stephen Gostkowski making the extra point the Patriots took a 7-0 lead. On 3rd and 18, Brian Hoyer found Nate Washington for a 49-yard pass to put Houston at New England's 25 yard line. The Texans ended the drive with a 37-yard field goal from Nick Novak to trail 3-7 late in the 1st quarter. The Patriots extended their lead early in the 2nd quarter to 10-3 with a 43-yard field goal from Stephen Gostkowski. After struggling to find their run game after the loss of Arian Foster, Jonathan Grimes took off for 37 yards to put the Texans at the Patriots' 43 yard line. The drive ended with another Novak field goal, this time from 45 yards. With Novak's kick good, Houston trailed 6-10 with 9:26 left in the half. To close out the first half, Tom Brady found Gronkowski for a 1-yard touchdown pass. With Gostkowski making the extra point New England extended their lead to 17-6 going into halftime. The Texans failed to score in the 2nd half, falling to the Patriots 27-6. Hoyer left the game late in the 4th quarter due to a possible concussion, with T. J. Yates coming in as the starting quarterback."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many total points were scored in the game?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "33"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The Texans and Patriots faced off on Sunday Night Football in a game with playoff implications for both teams. Houston received the opening kickoff, going into a three-and-out on the drive. On New England's second drive, Tom Brady found tight end Rob Gronkowski for a 40-yard reception to set up first and goal. To end the drive, Brady found Keshawn Martin for a 2-yard touchdown pass. With Stephen Gostkowski making the extra point the Patriots took a 7-0 lead. On 3rd and 18, Brian Hoyer found Nate Washington for a 49-yard pass to put Houston at New England's 25 yard line. The Texans ended the drive with a 37-yard field goal from Nick Novak to trail 3-7 late in the 1st quarter. The Patriots extended their lead early in the 2nd quarter to 10-3 with a 43-yard field goal from Stephen Gostkowski. After struggling to find their run game after the loss of Arian Foster, Jonathan Grimes took off for 37 yards to put the Texans at the Patriots' 43 yard line. The drive ended with another Novak field goal, this time from 45 yards. With Novak's kick good, Houston trailed 6-10 with 9:26 left in the half. To close out the first half, Tom Brady found Gronkowski for a 1-yard touchdown pass. With Gostkowski making the extra point New England extended their lead to 17-6 going into halftime. The Texans failed to score in the 2nd half, falling to the Patriots 27-6. Hoyer left the game late in the 4th quarter due to a possible concussion, with T. J. Yates coming in as the starting quarterback."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many points did the Patritos win by?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "21"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The Texans and Patriots faced off on Sunday Night Football in a game with playoff implications for both teams. Houston received the opening kickoff, going into a three-and-out on the drive. On New England's second drive, Tom Brady found tight end Rob Gronkowski for a 40-yard reception to set up first and goal. To end the drive, Brady found Keshawn Martin for a 2-yard touchdown pass. With Stephen Gostkowski making the extra point the Patriots took a 7-0 lead. On 3rd and 18, Brian Hoyer found Nate Washington for a 49-yard pass to put Houston at New England's 25 yard line. The Texans ended the drive with a 37-yard field goal from Nick Novak to trail 3-7 late in the 1st quarter. The Patriots extended their lead early in the 2nd quarter to 10-3 with a 43-yard field goal from Stephen Gostkowski. After struggling to find their run game after the loss of Arian Foster, Jonathan Grimes took off for 37 yards to put the Texans at the Patriots' 43 yard line. The drive ended with another Novak field goal, this time from 45 yards. With Novak's kick good, Houston trailed 6-10 with 9:26 left in the half. To close out the first half, Tom Brady found Gronkowski for a 1-yard touchdown pass. With Gostkowski making the extra point New England extended their lead to 17-6 going into halftime. The Texans failed to score in the 2nd half, falling to the Patriots 27-6. Hoyer left the game late in the 4th quarter due to a possible concussion, with T. J. Yates coming in as the starting quarterback."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many field goals were kicked in the first half?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "3"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The Texans and Patriots faced off on Sunday Night Football in a game with playoff implications for both teams. Houston received the opening kickoff, going into a three-and-out on the drive. On New England's second drive, Tom Brady found tight end Rob Gronkowski for a 40-yard reception to set up first and goal. To end the drive, Brady found Keshawn Martin for a 2-yard touchdown pass. With Stephen Gostkowski making the extra point the Patriots took a 7-0 lead. On 3rd and 18, Brian Hoyer found Nate Washington for a 49-yard pass to put Houston at New England's 25 yard line. The Texans ended the drive with a 37-yard field goal from Nick Novak to trail 3-7 late in the 1st quarter. The Patriots extended their lead early in the 2nd quarter to 10-3 with a 43-yard field goal from Stephen Gostkowski. After struggling to find their run game after the loss of Arian Foster, Jonathan Grimes took off for 37 yards to put the Texans at the Patriots' 43 yard line. The drive ended with another Novak field goal, this time from 45 yards. With Novak's kick good, Houston trailed 6-10 with 9:26 left in the half. To close out the first half, Tom Brady found Gronkowski for a 1-yard touchdown pass. With Gostkowski making the extra point New England extended their lead to 17-6 going into halftime. The Texans failed to score in the 2nd half, falling to the Patriots 27-6. Hoyer left the game late in the 4th quarter due to a possible concussion, with T. J. Yates coming in as the starting quarterback."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many receptions were for 40 yards or more in the first quarter?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "2"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The Texans and Patriots faced off on Sunday Night Football in a game with playoff implications for both teams. Houston received the opening kickoff, going into a three-and-out on the drive. On New England's second drive, Tom Brady found tight end Rob Gronkowski for a 40-yard reception to set up first and goal. To end the drive, Brady found Keshawn Martin for a 2-yard touchdown pass. With Stephen Gostkowski making the extra point the Patriots took a 7-0 lead. On 3rd and 18, Brian Hoyer found Nate Washington for a 49-yard pass to put Houston at New England's 25 yard line. The Texans ended the drive with a 37-yard field goal from Nick Novak to trail 3-7 late in the 1st quarter. The Patriots extended their lead early in the 2nd quarter to 10-3 with a 43-yard field goal from Stephen Gostkowski. After struggling to find their run game after the loss of Arian Foster, Jonathan Grimes took off for 37 yards to put the Texans at the Patriots' 43 yard line. The drive ended with another Novak field goal, this time from 45 yards. With Novak's kick good, Houston trailed 6-10 with 9:26 left in the half. To close out the first half, Tom Brady found Gronkowski for a 1-yard touchdown pass. With Gostkowski making the extra point New England extended their lead to 17-6 going into halftime. The Texans failed to score in the 2nd half, falling to the Patriots 27-6. Hoyer left the game late in the 4th quarter due to a possible concussion, with T. J. Yates coming in as the starting quarterback."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Who kicked the longest field goal in the second quarter?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Novak"
}
] |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.