messages
listlengths 4
4
|
|---|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "In the county, the population was spread out with 23.50% under the age of 18, 8.70% from 18 to 24, 29.70% from 25 to 44, 24.70% from 45 to 64, and 13.30% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 38 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.10 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.60 males."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which age group is larger: 25 to 44 or 45 to 64?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "25 to 44"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "In the county, the population was spread out with 23.50% under the age of 18, 8.70% from 18 to 24, 29.70% from 25 to 44, 24.70% from 45 to 64, and 13.30% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 38 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.10 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.60 males."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which age group is smaller: 25 to 44 or 45 to 64?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "45 to 64"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "In the county, the population was spread out with 23.50% under the age of 18, 8.70% from 18 to 24, 29.70% from 25 to 44, 24.70% from 45 to 64, and 13.30% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 38 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.10 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.60 males."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which age group is larger: under the age of 18 or 65 years of age or older?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "under the age of 18"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "In the county, the population was spread out with 23.50% under the age of 18, 8.70% from 18 to 24, 29.70% from 25 to 44, 24.70% from 45 to 64, and 13.30% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 38 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.10 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.60 males."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many percent were not under the age of 18?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "76.5"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "In the county, the population was spread out with 23.50% under the age of 18, 8.70% from 18 to 24, 29.70% from 25 to 44, 24.70% from 45 to 64, and 13.30% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 38 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.10 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.60 males."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many percent were not from 18 to 24?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "91.3"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "In the county, the population was spread out with 23.50% under the age of 18, 8.70% from 18 to 24, 29.70% from 25 to 44, 24.70% from 45 to 64, and 13.30% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 38 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.10 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.60 males."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many percent were not from 25 to 44?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "70.3"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "In the county, the population was spread out with 23.50% under the age of 18, 8.70% from 18 to 24, 29.70% from 25 to 44, 24.70% from 45 to 64, and 13.30% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 38 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.10 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.60 males."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many percent were not from 45 to 64?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "75.3"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "In the county, the population was spread out with 23.50% under the age of 18, 8.70% from 18 to 24, 29.70% from 25 to 44, 24.70% from 45 to 64, and 13.30% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 38 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.10 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.60 males."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many percent were not 65 years of age or older?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "86.7"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "In the county, the population was spread out with 23.50% under the age of 18, 8.70% from 18 to 24, 29.70% from 25 to 44, 24.70% from 45 to 64, and 13.30% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 38 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.10 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.60 males."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many years old was the average person?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "38"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "In the county, the population was spread out with 23.50% under the age of 18, 8.70% from 18 to 24, 29.70% from 25 to 44, 24.70% from 45 to 64, and 13.30% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 38 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.10 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.60 males."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many more females per 100 were there than males?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": ".9"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "In the county, the population was spread out with 23.50% under the age of 18, 8.70% from 18 to 24, 29.70% from 25 to 44, 24.70% from 45 to 64, and 13.30% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 38 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.10 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.60 males."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many more females per 100 were there than males 18 or over?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "3.4"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "In the county, the population was spread out with 23.50% under the age of 18, 8.70% from 18 to 24, 29.70% from 25 to 44, 24.70% from 45 to 64, and 13.30% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 38 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.10 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.60 males."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which age group had the most people?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "25 to 44"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "In the county, the population was spread out with 23.50% under the age of 18, 8.70% from 18 to 24, 29.70% from 25 to 44, 24.70% from 45 to 64, and 13.30% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 38 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.10 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.60 males."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which age group had the least people?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "18 to 24"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "In the county, the population was spread out with 23.50% under the age of 18, 8.70% from 18 to 24, 29.70% from 25 to 44, 24.70% from 45 to 64, and 13.30% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 38 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.10 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.60 males."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which age group had the second most people?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "45 to 64"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "In the county, the population was spread out with 23.50% under the age of 18, 8.70% from 18 to 24, 29.70% from 25 to 44, 24.70% from 45 to 64, and 13.30% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 38 years. For every 100 females, there were 99.10 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 96.60 males."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which age group had the third most people?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "under the age of 18"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The split effectively ended the realistic electoral chances of the Irish Unionist Alliance in southern Ireland. As the partition of Ireland became more likely, Southern Unionists formed numerous political movements in an attempt to find a solution to the \"Irish Question\". Among these were Irish Dominion League and the Irish Centre Party. As such, the southern rump of the IUA became increasingly fractured and in 1922 it lost its reason to exist with the establishment of the Irish Free State. Leading unionist figures, such as the Earl of Midleton, Lord Dunraven, James Campbell and Horace Plunkett were appointed in December 1922 by WT Cosgrave to the Free State's first Senate. Amongst others, Horace Plunkett's home in County Dublin was then burnt down during the Irish Civil War because of his involvement in the Irish Senate. The IUA helped form the Southern Irish Loyalist Relief Association to assist war refugees and claim compensation for damage to property. From 1921 IUA voters began to support the mainstream Cumann na nGaedheal party. In the 1923 election three formerly loyalist businessmen were elected as the Business and Professional Group. From 1921 to 1991 the proportion of Southern Irish Protestants declined from 10% to 3% of the population; these had provided the bulk of the IUA's support base. Unionists continued to have a majority on Rathmines Council until 1929, when the IUA's successors lost their last elected representatives in the Irish Free State."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How was Plunkett's house destroyed?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "burnt down"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The split effectively ended the realistic electoral chances of the Irish Unionist Alliance in southern Ireland. As the partition of Ireland became more likely, Southern Unionists formed numerous political movements in an attempt to find a solution to the \"Irish Question\". Among these were Irish Dominion League and the Irish Centre Party. As such, the southern rump of the IUA became increasingly fractured and in 1922 it lost its reason to exist with the establishment of the Irish Free State. Leading unionist figures, such as the Earl of Midleton, Lord Dunraven, James Campbell and Horace Plunkett were appointed in December 1922 by WT Cosgrave to the Free State's first Senate. Amongst others, Horace Plunkett's home in County Dublin was then burnt down during the Irish Civil War because of his involvement in the Irish Senate. The IUA helped form the Southern Irish Loyalist Relief Association to assist war refugees and claim compensation for damage to property. From 1921 IUA voters began to support the mainstream Cumann na nGaedheal party. In the 1923 election three formerly loyalist businessmen were elected as the Business and Professional Group. From 1921 to 1991 the proportion of Southern Irish Protestants declined from 10% to 3% of the population; these had provided the bulk of the IUA's support base. Unionists continued to have a majority on Rathmines Council until 1929, when the IUA's successors lost their last elected representatives in the Irish Free State."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The ratio of Southern Irish Protestants declined from 10% to 3% over how many years?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "70"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The split effectively ended the realistic electoral chances of the Irish Unionist Alliance in southern Ireland. As the partition of Ireland became more likely, Southern Unionists formed numerous political movements in an attempt to find a solution to the \"Irish Question\". Among these were Irish Dominion League and the Irish Centre Party. As such, the southern rump of the IUA became increasingly fractured and in 1922 it lost its reason to exist with the establishment of the Irish Free State. Leading unionist figures, such as the Earl of Midleton, Lord Dunraven, James Campbell and Horace Plunkett were appointed in December 1922 by WT Cosgrave to the Free State's first Senate. Amongst others, Horace Plunkett's home in County Dublin was then burnt down during the Irish Civil War because of his involvement in the Irish Senate. The IUA helped form the Southern Irish Loyalist Relief Association to assist war refugees and claim compensation for damage to property. From 1921 IUA voters began to support the mainstream Cumann na nGaedheal party. In the 1923 election three formerly loyalist businessmen were elected as the Business and Professional Group. From 1921 to 1991 the proportion of Southern Irish Protestants declined from 10% to 3% of the population; these had provided the bulk of the IUA's support base. Unionists continued to have a majority on Rathmines Council until 1929, when the IUA's successors lost their last elected representatives in the Irish Free State."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many officials were mentioned that were appointed in December 1922 to the Free State's first Senate?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "4"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The split effectively ended the realistic electoral chances of the Irish Unionist Alliance in southern Ireland. As the partition of Ireland became more likely, Southern Unionists formed numerous political movements in an attempt to find a solution to the \"Irish Question\". Among these were Irish Dominion League and the Irish Centre Party. As such, the southern rump of the IUA became increasingly fractured and in 1922 it lost its reason to exist with the establishment of the Irish Free State. Leading unionist figures, such as the Earl of Midleton, Lord Dunraven, James Campbell and Horace Plunkett were appointed in December 1922 by WT Cosgrave to the Free State's first Senate. Amongst others, Horace Plunkett's home in County Dublin was then burnt down during the Irish Civil War because of his involvement in the Irish Senate. The IUA helped form the Southern Irish Loyalist Relief Association to assist war refugees and claim compensation for damage to property. From 1921 IUA voters began to support the mainstream Cumann na nGaedheal party. In the 1923 election three formerly loyalist businessmen were elected as the Business and Professional Group. From 1921 to 1991 the proportion of Southern Irish Protestants declined from 10% to 3% of the population; these had provided the bulk of the IUA's support base. Unionists continued to have a majority on Rathmines Council until 1929, when the IUA's successors lost their last elected representatives in the Irish Free State."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many years did it take for the proportion of the Southern Irish Protestants decline from 10% to 3%?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "70"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The split effectively ended the realistic electoral chances of the Irish Unionist Alliance in southern Ireland. As the partition of Ireland became more likely, Southern Unionists formed numerous political movements in an attempt to find a solution to the \"Irish Question\". Among these were Irish Dominion League and the Irish Centre Party. As such, the southern rump of the IUA became increasingly fractured and in 1922 it lost its reason to exist with the establishment of the Irish Free State. Leading unionist figures, such as the Earl of Midleton, Lord Dunraven, James Campbell and Horace Plunkett were appointed in December 1922 by WT Cosgrave to the Free State's first Senate. Amongst others, Horace Plunkett's home in County Dublin was then burnt down during the Irish Civil War because of his involvement in the Irish Senate. The IUA helped form the Southern Irish Loyalist Relief Association to assist war refugees and claim compensation for damage to property. From 1921 IUA voters began to support the mainstream Cumann na nGaedheal party. In the 1923 election three formerly loyalist businessmen were elected as the Business and Professional Group. From 1921 to 1991 the proportion of Southern Irish Protestants declined from 10% to 3% of the population; these had provided the bulk of the IUA's support base. Unionists continued to have a majority on Rathmines Council until 1929, when the IUA's successors lost their last elected representatives in the Irish Free State."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many percentage points did the proportion of Southern Irish Protestants decrease from 1921 to 1991?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "7"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The split effectively ended the realistic electoral chances of the Irish Unionist Alliance in southern Ireland. As the partition of Ireland became more likely, Southern Unionists formed numerous political movements in an attempt to find a solution to the \"Irish Question\". Among these were Irish Dominion League and the Irish Centre Party. As such, the southern rump of the IUA became increasingly fractured and in 1922 it lost its reason to exist with the establishment of the Irish Free State. Leading unionist figures, such as the Earl of Midleton, Lord Dunraven, James Campbell and Horace Plunkett were appointed in December 1922 by WT Cosgrave to the Free State's first Senate. Amongst others, Horace Plunkett's home in County Dublin was then burnt down during the Irish Civil War because of his involvement in the Irish Senate. The IUA helped form the Southern Irish Loyalist Relief Association to assist war refugees and claim compensation for damage to property. From 1921 IUA voters began to support the mainstream Cumann na nGaedheal party. In the 1923 election three formerly loyalist businessmen were elected as the Business and Professional Group. From 1921 to 1991 the proportion of Southern Irish Protestants declined from 10% to 3% of the population; these had provided the bulk of the IUA's support base. Unionists continued to have a majority on Rathmines Council until 1929, when the IUA's successors lost their last elected representatives in the Irish Free State."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many years did it take the proportion of Southern Irish Protestants to decline from 10 to 3%?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "70"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Both sides had forces that did not arrive at Sekigahara in time to participate due to other battles. Ieyasu's son Hidetada led another group through Nakasendō. However, Hidetada's forces were bogged down as he attempted to besiege Sanada Masayuki's Ueda Castle against his father's direct orders. Even though the Tokugawa forces numbered some 38,000, an overwhelming advantage over the Sanada's mere 2,000, they were still unable to capture the strategist's well-defended position. At the same time, 15,000 Toyotomi troops were being held up by 500 troops under Hosokawa Yūsai at Tanabe Castle in present-day Maizuru, Kyoto Prefecture. Some among the 15,000 troops respected Hosokawa so much they intentionally slowed their pace. Due to these incidents, a large number of troops from both sides failed to show up in time for the battle. If either of these armies participated in the conflict, it could have ended quite differently."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many more forces Tokugawa had than Sanada?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "36000"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Both sides had forces that did not arrive at Sekigahara in time to participate due to other battles. Ieyasu's son Hidetada led another group through Nakasendō. However, Hidetada's forces were bogged down as he attempted to besiege Sanada Masayuki's Ueda Castle against his father's direct orders. Even though the Tokugawa forces numbered some 38,000, an overwhelming advantage over the Sanada's mere 2,000, they were still unable to capture the strategist's well-defended position. At the same time, 15,000 Toyotomi troops were being held up by 500 troops under Hosokawa Yūsai at Tanabe Castle in present-day Maizuru, Kyoto Prefecture. Some among the 15,000 troops respected Hosokawa so much they intentionally slowed their pace. Due to these incidents, a large number of troops from both sides failed to show up in time for the battle. If either of these armies participated in the conflict, it could have ended quite differently."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Who had more forces under their command, Toyotomi or Hosokawa?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Toyotomi"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Both sides had forces that did not arrive at Sekigahara in time to participate due to other battles. Ieyasu's son Hidetada led another group through Nakasendō. However, Hidetada's forces were bogged down as he attempted to besiege Sanada Masayuki's Ueda Castle against his father's direct orders. Even though the Tokugawa forces numbered some 38,000, an overwhelming advantage over the Sanada's mere 2,000, they were still unable to capture the strategist's well-defended position. At the same time, 15,000 Toyotomi troops were being held up by 500 troops under Hosokawa Yūsai at Tanabe Castle in present-day Maizuru, Kyoto Prefecture. Some among the 15,000 troops respected Hosokawa so much they intentionally slowed their pace. Due to these incidents, a large number of troops from both sides failed to show up in time for the battle. If either of these armies participated in the conflict, it could have ended quite differently."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many more forces did Tokugawa have compared to Sanada's?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "36000"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Both sides had forces that did not arrive at Sekigahara in time to participate due to other battles. Ieyasu's son Hidetada led another group through Nakasendō. However, Hidetada's forces were bogged down as he attempted to besiege Sanada Masayuki's Ueda Castle against his father's direct orders. Even though the Tokugawa forces numbered some 38,000, an overwhelming advantage over the Sanada's mere 2,000, they were still unable to capture the strategist's well-defended position. At the same time, 15,000 Toyotomi troops were being held up by 500 troops under Hosokawa Yūsai at Tanabe Castle in present-day Maizuru, Kyoto Prefecture. Some among the 15,000 troops respected Hosokawa so much they intentionally slowed their pace. Due to these incidents, a large number of troops from both sides failed to show up in time for the battle. If either of these armies participated in the conflict, it could have ended quite differently."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Why did troops slow theier pace?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "respected Hosokawa so much"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Both sides had forces that did not arrive at Sekigahara in time to participate due to other battles. Ieyasu's son Hidetada led another group through Nakasendō. However, Hidetada's forces were bogged down as he attempted to besiege Sanada Masayuki's Ueda Castle against his father's direct orders. Even though the Tokugawa forces numbered some 38,000, an overwhelming advantage over the Sanada's mere 2,000, they were still unable to capture the strategist's well-defended position. At the same time, 15,000 Toyotomi troops were being held up by 500 troops under Hosokawa Yūsai at Tanabe Castle in present-day Maizuru, Kyoto Prefecture. Some among the 15,000 troops respected Hosokawa so much they intentionally slowed their pace. Due to these incidents, a large number of troops from both sides failed to show up in time for the battle. If either of these armies participated in the conflict, it could have ended quite differently."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many were in the Tokugawa force then Sanada's force?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "36000"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Both sides had forces that did not arrive at Sekigahara in time to participate due to other battles. Ieyasu's son Hidetada led another group through Nakasendō. However, Hidetada's forces were bogged down as he attempted to besiege Sanada Masayuki's Ueda Castle against his father's direct orders. Even though the Tokugawa forces numbered some 38,000, an overwhelming advantage over the Sanada's mere 2,000, they were still unable to capture the strategist's well-defended position. At the same time, 15,000 Toyotomi troops were being held up by 500 troops under Hosokawa Yūsai at Tanabe Castle in present-day Maizuru, Kyoto Prefecture. Some among the 15,000 troops respected Hosokawa so much they intentionally slowed their pace. Due to these incidents, a large number of troops from both sides failed to show up in time for the battle. If either of these armies participated in the conflict, it could have ended quite differently."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many troops were at Tanabe Castle?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "15500"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Both sides had forces that did not arrive at Sekigahara in time to participate due to other battles. Ieyasu's son Hidetada led another group through Nakasendō. However, Hidetada's forces were bogged down as he attempted to besiege Sanada Masayuki's Ueda Castle against his father's direct orders. Even though the Tokugawa forces numbered some 38,000, an overwhelming advantage over the Sanada's mere 2,000, they were still unable to capture the strategist's well-defended position. At the same time, 15,000 Toyotomi troops were being held up by 500 troops under Hosokawa Yūsai at Tanabe Castle in present-day Maizuru, Kyoto Prefecture. Some among the 15,000 troops respected Hosokawa so much they intentionally slowed their pace. Due to these incidents, a large number of troops from both sides failed to show up in time for the battle. If either of these armies participated in the conflict, it could have ended quite differently."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Who had more troops, Tokugawa or Sanada?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Tokugawa"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Both sides had forces that did not arrive at Sekigahara in time to participate due to other battles. Ieyasu's son Hidetada led another group through Nakasendō. However, Hidetada's forces were bogged down as he attempted to besiege Sanada Masayuki's Ueda Castle against his father's direct orders. Even though the Tokugawa forces numbered some 38,000, an overwhelming advantage over the Sanada's mere 2,000, they were still unable to capture the strategist's well-defended position. At the same time, 15,000 Toyotomi troops were being held up by 500 troops under Hosokawa Yūsai at Tanabe Castle in present-day Maizuru, Kyoto Prefecture. Some among the 15,000 troops respected Hosokawa so much they intentionally slowed their pace. Due to these incidents, a large number of troops from both sides failed to show up in time for the battle. If either of these armies participated in the conflict, it could have ended quite differently."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many did Tokugawa's forces outnumber Sanada's forces by?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "36000"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Both sides had forces that did not arrive at Sekigahara in time to participate due to other battles. Ieyasu's son Hidetada led another group through Nakasendō. However, Hidetada's forces were bogged down as he attempted to besiege Sanada Masayuki's Ueda Castle against his father's direct orders. Even though the Tokugawa forces numbered some 38,000, an overwhelming advantage over the Sanada's mere 2,000, they were still unable to capture the strategist's well-defended position. At the same time, 15,000 Toyotomi troops were being held up by 500 troops under Hosokawa Yūsai at Tanabe Castle in present-day Maizuru, Kyoto Prefecture. Some among the 15,000 troops respected Hosokawa so much they intentionally slowed their pace. Due to these incidents, a large number of troops from both sides failed to show up in time for the battle. If either of these armies participated in the conflict, it could have ended quite differently."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Who had more forces, Tokugawa or Toyotomi?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Tokugawa"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Both sides had forces that did not arrive at Sekigahara in time to participate due to other battles. Ieyasu's son Hidetada led another group through Nakasendō. However, Hidetada's forces were bogged down as he attempted to besiege Sanada Masayuki's Ueda Castle against his father's direct orders. Even though the Tokugawa forces numbered some 38,000, an overwhelming advantage over the Sanada's mere 2,000, they were still unable to capture the strategist's well-defended position. At the same time, 15,000 Toyotomi troops were being held up by 500 troops under Hosokawa Yūsai at Tanabe Castle in present-day Maizuru, Kyoto Prefecture. Some among the 15,000 troops respected Hosokawa so much they intentionally slowed their pace. Due to these incidents, a large number of troops from both sides failed to show up in time for the battle. If either of these armies participated in the conflict, it could have ended quite differently."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many more men did Tokugawa forces have compared to Sanada?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "36000"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Both sides had forces that did not arrive at Sekigahara in time to participate due to other battles. Ieyasu's son Hidetada led another group through Nakasendō. However, Hidetada's forces were bogged down as he attempted to besiege Sanada Masayuki's Ueda Castle against his father's direct orders. Even though the Tokugawa forces numbered some 38,000, an overwhelming advantage over the Sanada's mere 2,000, they were still unable to capture the strategist's well-defended position. At the same time, 15,000 Toyotomi troops were being held up by 500 troops under Hosokawa Yūsai at Tanabe Castle in present-day Maizuru, Kyoto Prefecture. Some among the 15,000 troops respected Hosokawa so much they intentionally slowed their pace. Due to these incidents, a large number of troops from both sides failed to show up in time for the battle. If either of these armies participated in the conflict, it could have ended quite differently."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many more troops did Toyotomi have compared to those holding them under Hosokawa Yūsai at Tanabe Castle?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "14500"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Both sides had forces that did not arrive at Sekigahara in time to participate due to other battles. Ieyasu's son Hidetada led another group through Nakasendō. However, Hidetada's forces were bogged down as he attempted to besiege Sanada Masayuki's Ueda Castle against his father's direct orders. Even though the Tokugawa forces numbered some 38,000, an overwhelming advantage over the Sanada's mere 2,000, they were still unable to capture the strategist's well-defended position. At the same time, 15,000 Toyotomi troops were being held up by 500 troops under Hosokawa Yūsai at Tanabe Castle in present-day Maizuru, Kyoto Prefecture. Some among the 15,000 troops respected Hosokawa so much they intentionally slowed their pace. Due to these incidents, a large number of troops from both sides failed to show up in time for the battle. If either of these armies participated in the conflict, it could have ended quite differently."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many more troops were in the Tokugawa forces than Sanada had?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "36000"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Hoping to rebound from their loss to the Jets, the Steelers stayed at home for a Week 16 interconference duel with the Carolina Panthers on Thursday night. Pittsburgh delivered the game's opening punch in the first quarter with a 26-yard field goal from kicker Shaun Suisham. The Steelers added onto their lead in the second quarter as Roethlisberger found wide receiver Mike Wallace on a 43-yard touchdown pass, followed by a 1-yard touchdown run from running back Rashard Mendenhall and a 29-yard field goal from Suisham. Pittsburgh continued their dominating night in the third quarter with Roethlisberger's 1-yard touchdown run. The Panthers would close out the game in the fourth quarter as kicker John Kasay got a 27-yard field goal."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many field goals were made during the first half?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "2"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Many of the migrants from China in the 19th century came to work on the pepper and Uncaria gambir plantations, with 11,000 Chinese immigrants recorded in one year. Singapore became one of the entry and dispersal points for large number of Chinese and Indian migrants who came to work in the plantations and mines of the Straits Settlements, many of whom then settled in Singapore after their contract ended. By 1860, the total population had reached around 90,000, of these 50,000 were Chinese, and 2,445 Europeans and Eurasians. The first thorough census in Singapore was undertaken in 1871, and the people were grouped into 33 racial, ethnic or national categories, with Chinese forming the largest group at 57.6%. Censuses were then conducted at 10 year intervals afterwards. The 1881 census grouped the people into 6 main categories, and further subdivided into 47 sub-categories. The 6 broad groups were given as Europeans, Eurasians, Malays, Chinese, Indians and Others in 1921. The Malays group includes other natives of the Malay archipelago, the Europeans include Americans, the Indians would be people from the Indian subcontinent including what would now be Pakistan and Bangladesh. In 1901, the total population of Singapore was 228,555, with 15.8% Malays, 71.8% Chinese, 7.8% Indians, and 3.5% Europeans and Eurasians. The Chinese population figure of Singapore has stayed at over 70% of the total since, reaching 77.8% in 1947. After dropping from a peak of 60% in the early years of Singapore, the Malay population would range between 11 and 16% in the first half of the 20th century, while Indians hovered between 7 and just over 9% in the same period."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many in percent in 1901 Singapore wasn't Malays?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "84.2"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Many of the migrants from China in the 19th century came to work on the pepper and Uncaria gambir plantations, with 11,000 Chinese immigrants recorded in one year. Singapore became one of the entry and dispersal points for large number of Chinese and Indian migrants who came to work in the plantations and mines of the Straits Settlements, many of whom then settled in Singapore after their contract ended. By 1860, the total population had reached around 90,000, of these 50,000 were Chinese, and 2,445 Europeans and Eurasians. The first thorough census in Singapore was undertaken in 1871, and the people were grouped into 33 racial, ethnic or national categories, with Chinese forming the largest group at 57.6%. Censuses were then conducted at 10 year intervals afterwards. The 1881 census grouped the people into 6 main categories, and further subdivided into 47 sub-categories. The 6 broad groups were given as Europeans, Eurasians, Malays, Chinese, Indians and Others in 1921. The Malays group includes other natives of the Malay archipelago, the Europeans include Americans, the Indians would be people from the Indian subcontinent including what would now be Pakistan and Bangladesh. In 1901, the total population of Singapore was 228,555, with 15.8% Malays, 71.8% Chinese, 7.8% Indians, and 3.5% Europeans and Eurasians. The Chinese population figure of Singapore has stayed at over 70% of the total since, reaching 77.8% in 1947. After dropping from a peak of 60% in the early years of Singapore, the Malay population would range between 11 and 16% in the first half of the 20th century, while Indians hovered between 7 and just over 9% in the same period."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many in percent in 1901 Singapore wasn't Chinese?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "28.2"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Many of the migrants from China in the 19th century came to work on the pepper and Uncaria gambir plantations, with 11,000 Chinese immigrants recorded in one year. Singapore became one of the entry and dispersal points for large number of Chinese and Indian migrants who came to work in the plantations and mines of the Straits Settlements, many of whom then settled in Singapore after their contract ended. By 1860, the total population had reached around 90,000, of these 50,000 were Chinese, and 2,445 Europeans and Eurasians. The first thorough census in Singapore was undertaken in 1871, and the people were grouped into 33 racial, ethnic or national categories, with Chinese forming the largest group at 57.6%. Censuses were then conducted at 10 year intervals afterwards. The 1881 census grouped the people into 6 main categories, and further subdivided into 47 sub-categories. The 6 broad groups were given as Europeans, Eurasians, Malays, Chinese, Indians and Others in 1921. The Malays group includes other natives of the Malay archipelago, the Europeans include Americans, the Indians would be people from the Indian subcontinent including what would now be Pakistan and Bangladesh. In 1901, the total population of Singapore was 228,555, with 15.8% Malays, 71.8% Chinese, 7.8% Indians, and 3.5% Europeans and Eurasians. The Chinese population figure of Singapore has stayed at over 70% of the total since, reaching 77.8% in 1947. After dropping from a peak of 60% in the early years of Singapore, the Malay population would range between 11 and 16% in the first half of the 20th century, while Indians hovered between 7 and just over 9% in the same period."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many in percent in 1901 Singapore wasn't Indian?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "92.2"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Many of the migrants from China in the 19th century came to work on the pepper and Uncaria gambir plantations, with 11,000 Chinese immigrants recorded in one year. Singapore became one of the entry and dispersal points for large number of Chinese and Indian migrants who came to work in the plantations and mines of the Straits Settlements, many of whom then settled in Singapore after their contract ended. By 1860, the total population had reached around 90,000, of these 50,000 were Chinese, and 2,445 Europeans and Eurasians. The first thorough census in Singapore was undertaken in 1871, and the people were grouped into 33 racial, ethnic or national categories, with Chinese forming the largest group at 57.6%. Censuses were then conducted at 10 year intervals afterwards. The 1881 census grouped the people into 6 main categories, and further subdivided into 47 sub-categories. The 6 broad groups were given as Europeans, Eurasians, Malays, Chinese, Indians and Others in 1921. The Malays group includes other natives of the Malay archipelago, the Europeans include Americans, the Indians would be people from the Indian subcontinent including what would now be Pakistan and Bangladesh. In 1901, the total population of Singapore was 228,555, with 15.8% Malays, 71.8% Chinese, 7.8% Indians, and 3.5% Europeans and Eurasians. The Chinese population figure of Singapore has stayed at over 70% of the total since, reaching 77.8% in 1947. After dropping from a peak of 60% in the early years of Singapore, the Malay population would range between 11 and 16% in the first half of the 20th century, while Indians hovered between 7 and just over 9% in the same period."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many in percent in 1901 Singapore wasn't Europeans and Eurasians?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "96.5"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Many of the migrants from China in the 19th century came to work on the pepper and Uncaria gambir plantations, with 11,000 Chinese immigrants recorded in one year. Singapore became one of the entry and dispersal points for large number of Chinese and Indian migrants who came to work in the plantations and mines of the Straits Settlements, many of whom then settled in Singapore after their contract ended. By 1860, the total population had reached around 90,000, of these 50,000 were Chinese, and 2,445 Europeans and Eurasians. The first thorough census in Singapore was undertaken in 1871, and the people were grouped into 33 racial, ethnic or national categories, with Chinese forming the largest group at 57.6%. Censuses were then conducted at 10 year intervals afterwards. The 1881 census grouped the people into 6 main categories, and further subdivided into 47 sub-categories. The 6 broad groups were given as Europeans, Eurasians, Malays, Chinese, Indians and Others in 1921. The Malays group includes other natives of the Malay archipelago, the Europeans include Americans, the Indians would be people from the Indian subcontinent including what would now be Pakistan and Bangladesh. In 1901, the total population of Singapore was 228,555, with 15.8% Malays, 71.8% Chinese, 7.8% Indians, and 3.5% Europeans and Eurasians. The Chinese population figure of Singapore has stayed at over 70% of the total since, reaching 77.8% in 1947. After dropping from a peak of 60% in the early years of Singapore, the Malay population would range between 11 and 16% in the first half of the 20th century, while Indians hovered between 7 and just over 9% in the same period."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "In 1860 were there more Chinese or Europeans and Eurasians in Singapore?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Chinese"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Many of the migrants from China in the 19th century came to work on the pepper and Uncaria gambir plantations, with 11,000 Chinese immigrants recorded in one year. Singapore became one of the entry and dispersal points for large number of Chinese and Indian migrants who came to work in the plantations and mines of the Straits Settlements, many of whom then settled in Singapore after their contract ended. By 1860, the total population had reached around 90,000, of these 50,000 were Chinese, and 2,445 Europeans and Eurasians. The first thorough census in Singapore was undertaken in 1871, and the people were grouped into 33 racial, ethnic or national categories, with Chinese forming the largest group at 57.6%. Censuses were then conducted at 10 year intervals afterwards. The 1881 census grouped the people into 6 main categories, and further subdivided into 47 sub-categories. The 6 broad groups were given as Europeans, Eurasians, Malays, Chinese, Indians and Others in 1921. The Malays group includes other natives of the Malay archipelago, the Europeans include Americans, the Indians would be people from the Indian subcontinent including what would now be Pakistan and Bangladesh. In 1901, the total population of Singapore was 228,555, with 15.8% Malays, 71.8% Chinese, 7.8% Indians, and 3.5% Europeans and Eurasians. The Chinese population figure of Singapore has stayed at over 70% of the total since, reaching 77.8% in 1947. After dropping from a peak of 60% in the early years of Singapore, the Malay population would range between 11 and 16% in the first half of the 20th century, while Indians hovered between 7 and just over 9% in the same period."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "In 1860 how many people in Singapore were not Chinese?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "40000"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Many of the migrants from China in the 19th century came to work on the pepper and Uncaria gambir plantations, with 11,000 Chinese immigrants recorded in one year. Singapore became one of the entry and dispersal points for large number of Chinese and Indian migrants who came to work in the plantations and mines of the Straits Settlements, many of whom then settled in Singapore after their contract ended. By 1860, the total population had reached around 90,000, of these 50,000 were Chinese, and 2,445 Europeans and Eurasians. The first thorough census in Singapore was undertaken in 1871, and the people were grouped into 33 racial, ethnic or national categories, with Chinese forming the largest group at 57.6%. Censuses were then conducted at 10 year intervals afterwards. The 1881 census grouped the people into 6 main categories, and further subdivided into 47 sub-categories. The 6 broad groups were given as Europeans, Eurasians, Malays, Chinese, Indians and Others in 1921. The Malays group includes other natives of the Malay archipelago, the Europeans include Americans, the Indians would be people from the Indian subcontinent including what would now be Pakistan and Bangladesh. In 1901, the total population of Singapore was 228,555, with 15.8% Malays, 71.8% Chinese, 7.8% Indians, and 3.5% Europeans and Eurasians. The Chinese population figure of Singapore has stayed at over 70% of the total since, reaching 77.8% in 1947. After dropping from a peak of 60% in the early years of Singapore, the Malay population would range between 11 and 16% in the first half of the 20th century, while Indians hovered between 7 and just over 9% in the same period."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many people, in terms of percentage of the population of Singapore, were not Chinese as of 1871?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "42.4"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Many of the migrants from China in the 19th century came to work on the pepper and Uncaria gambir plantations, with 11,000 Chinese immigrants recorded in one year. Singapore became one of the entry and dispersal points for large number of Chinese and Indian migrants who came to work in the plantations and mines of the Straits Settlements, many of whom then settled in Singapore after their contract ended. By 1860, the total population had reached around 90,000, of these 50,000 were Chinese, and 2,445 Europeans and Eurasians. The first thorough census in Singapore was undertaken in 1871, and the people were grouped into 33 racial, ethnic or national categories, with Chinese forming the largest group at 57.6%. Censuses were then conducted at 10 year intervals afterwards. The 1881 census grouped the people into 6 main categories, and further subdivided into 47 sub-categories. The 6 broad groups were given as Europeans, Eurasians, Malays, Chinese, Indians and Others in 1921. The Malays group includes other natives of the Malay archipelago, the Europeans include Americans, the Indians would be people from the Indian subcontinent including what would now be Pakistan and Bangladesh. In 1901, the total population of Singapore was 228,555, with 15.8% Malays, 71.8% Chinese, 7.8% Indians, and 3.5% Europeans and Eurasians. The Chinese population figure of Singapore has stayed at over 70% of the total since, reaching 77.8% in 1947. After dropping from a peak of 60% in the early years of Singapore, the Malay population would range between 11 and 16% in the first half of the 20th century, while Indians hovered between 7 and just over 9% in the same period."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which group made up the second largest percentage of the Singapore population in 1901?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Malays"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Many of the migrants from China in the 19th century came to work on the pepper and Uncaria gambir plantations, with 11,000 Chinese immigrants recorded in one year. Singapore became one of the entry and dispersal points for large number of Chinese and Indian migrants who came to work in the plantations and mines of the Straits Settlements, many of whom then settled in Singapore after their contract ended. By 1860, the total population had reached around 90,000, of these 50,000 were Chinese, and 2,445 Europeans and Eurasians. The first thorough census in Singapore was undertaken in 1871, and the people were grouped into 33 racial, ethnic or national categories, with Chinese forming the largest group at 57.6%. Censuses were then conducted at 10 year intervals afterwards. The 1881 census grouped the people into 6 main categories, and further subdivided into 47 sub-categories. The 6 broad groups were given as Europeans, Eurasians, Malays, Chinese, Indians and Others in 1921. The Malays group includes other natives of the Malay archipelago, the Europeans include Americans, the Indians would be people from the Indian subcontinent including what would now be Pakistan and Bangladesh. In 1901, the total population of Singapore was 228,555, with 15.8% Malays, 71.8% Chinese, 7.8% Indians, and 3.5% Europeans and Eurasians. The Chinese population figure of Singapore has stayed at over 70% of the total since, reaching 77.8% in 1947. After dropping from a peak of 60% in the early years of Singapore, the Malay population would range between 11 and 16% in the first half of the 20th century, while Indians hovered between 7 and just over 9% in the same period."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Were there more Malays or Indians in Singapore in 1901?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Malays"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Many of the migrants from China in the 19th century came to work on the pepper and Uncaria gambir plantations, with 11,000 Chinese immigrants recorded in one year. Singapore became one of the entry and dispersal points for large number of Chinese and Indian migrants who came to work in the plantations and mines of the Straits Settlements, many of whom then settled in Singapore after their contract ended. By 1860, the total population had reached around 90,000, of these 50,000 were Chinese, and 2,445 Europeans and Eurasians. The first thorough census in Singapore was undertaken in 1871, and the people were grouped into 33 racial, ethnic or national categories, with Chinese forming the largest group at 57.6%. Censuses were then conducted at 10 year intervals afterwards. The 1881 census grouped the people into 6 main categories, and further subdivided into 47 sub-categories. The 6 broad groups were given as Europeans, Eurasians, Malays, Chinese, Indians and Others in 1921. The Malays group includes other natives of the Malay archipelago, the Europeans include Americans, the Indians would be people from the Indian subcontinent including what would now be Pakistan and Bangladesh. In 1901, the total population of Singapore was 228,555, with 15.8% Malays, 71.8% Chinese, 7.8% Indians, and 3.5% Europeans and Eurasians. The Chinese population figure of Singapore has stayed at over 70% of the total since, reaching 77.8% in 1947. After dropping from a peak of 60% in the early years of Singapore, the Malay population would range between 11 and 16% in the first half of the 20th century, while Indians hovered between 7 and just over 9% in the same period."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Were there more Europeans and Eurasians or Indians in Singapore in 1901?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Indians"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Many of the migrants from China in the 19th century came to work on the pepper and Uncaria gambir plantations, with 11,000 Chinese immigrants recorded in one year. Singapore became one of the entry and dispersal points for large number of Chinese and Indian migrants who came to work in the plantations and mines of the Straits Settlements, many of whom then settled in Singapore after their contract ended. By 1860, the total population had reached around 90,000, of these 50,000 were Chinese, and 2,445 Europeans and Eurasians. The first thorough census in Singapore was undertaken in 1871, and the people were grouped into 33 racial, ethnic or national categories, with Chinese forming the largest group at 57.6%. Censuses were then conducted at 10 year intervals afterwards. The 1881 census grouped the people into 6 main categories, and further subdivided into 47 sub-categories. The 6 broad groups were given as Europeans, Eurasians, Malays, Chinese, Indians and Others in 1921. The Malays group includes other natives of the Malay archipelago, the Europeans include Americans, the Indians would be people from the Indian subcontinent including what would now be Pakistan and Bangladesh. In 1901, the total population of Singapore was 228,555, with 15.8% Malays, 71.8% Chinese, 7.8% Indians, and 3.5% Europeans and Eurasians. The Chinese population figure of Singapore has stayed at over 70% of the total since, reaching 77.8% in 1947. After dropping from a peak of 60% in the early years of Singapore, the Malay population would range between 11 and 16% in the first half of the 20th century, while Indians hovered between 7 and just over 9% in the same period."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many Malays were there in Singapore in 1901 in terms of absolute number?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "36112"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Many of the migrants from China in the 19th century came to work on the pepper and Uncaria gambir plantations, with 11,000 Chinese immigrants recorded in one year. Singapore became one of the entry and dispersal points for large number of Chinese and Indian migrants who came to work in the plantations and mines of the Straits Settlements, many of whom then settled in Singapore after their contract ended. By 1860, the total population had reached around 90,000, of these 50,000 were Chinese, and 2,445 Europeans and Eurasians. The first thorough census in Singapore was undertaken in 1871, and the people were grouped into 33 racial, ethnic or national categories, with Chinese forming the largest group at 57.6%. Censuses were then conducted at 10 year intervals afterwards. The 1881 census grouped the people into 6 main categories, and further subdivided into 47 sub-categories. The 6 broad groups were given as Europeans, Eurasians, Malays, Chinese, Indians and Others in 1921. The Malays group includes other natives of the Malay archipelago, the Europeans include Americans, the Indians would be people from the Indian subcontinent including what would now be Pakistan and Bangladesh. In 1901, the total population of Singapore was 228,555, with 15.8% Malays, 71.8% Chinese, 7.8% Indians, and 3.5% Europeans and Eurasians. The Chinese population figure of Singapore has stayed at over 70% of the total since, reaching 77.8% in 1947. After dropping from a peak of 60% in the early years of Singapore, the Malay population would range between 11 and 16% in the first half of the 20th century, while Indians hovered between 7 and just over 9% in the same period."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many Chinese were there in Singapore in 1901 in terms of absolute number?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "164102"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Many of the migrants from China in the 19th century came to work on the pepper and Uncaria gambir plantations, with 11,000 Chinese immigrants recorded in one year. Singapore became one of the entry and dispersal points for large number of Chinese and Indian migrants who came to work in the plantations and mines of the Straits Settlements, many of whom then settled in Singapore after their contract ended. By 1860, the total population had reached around 90,000, of these 50,000 were Chinese, and 2,445 Europeans and Eurasians. The first thorough census in Singapore was undertaken in 1871, and the people were grouped into 33 racial, ethnic or national categories, with Chinese forming the largest group at 57.6%. Censuses were then conducted at 10 year intervals afterwards. The 1881 census grouped the people into 6 main categories, and further subdivided into 47 sub-categories. The 6 broad groups were given as Europeans, Eurasians, Malays, Chinese, Indians and Others in 1921. The Malays group includes other natives of the Malay archipelago, the Europeans include Americans, the Indians would be people from the Indian subcontinent including what would now be Pakistan and Bangladesh. In 1901, the total population of Singapore was 228,555, with 15.8% Malays, 71.8% Chinese, 7.8% Indians, and 3.5% Europeans and Eurasians. The Chinese population figure of Singapore has stayed at over 70% of the total since, reaching 77.8% in 1947. After dropping from a peak of 60% in the early years of Singapore, the Malay population would range between 11 and 16% in the first half of the 20th century, while Indians hovered between 7 and just over 9% in the same period."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many people, in terms of percentage of the population of Singapore, were not Chinese in 1901?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "28.2"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Many of the migrants from China in the 19th century came to work on the pepper and Uncaria gambir plantations, with 11,000 Chinese immigrants recorded in one year. Singapore became one of the entry and dispersal points for large number of Chinese and Indian migrants who came to work in the plantations and mines of the Straits Settlements, many of whom then settled in Singapore after their contract ended. By 1860, the total population had reached around 90,000, of these 50,000 were Chinese, and 2,445 Europeans and Eurasians. The first thorough census in Singapore was undertaken in 1871, and the people were grouped into 33 racial, ethnic or national categories, with Chinese forming the largest group at 57.6%. Censuses were then conducted at 10 year intervals afterwards. The 1881 census grouped the people into 6 main categories, and further subdivided into 47 sub-categories. The 6 broad groups were given as Europeans, Eurasians, Malays, Chinese, Indians and Others in 1921. The Malays group includes other natives of the Malay archipelago, the Europeans include Americans, the Indians would be people from the Indian subcontinent including what would now be Pakistan and Bangladesh. In 1901, the total population of Singapore was 228,555, with 15.8% Malays, 71.8% Chinese, 7.8% Indians, and 3.5% Europeans and Eurasians. The Chinese population figure of Singapore has stayed at over 70% of the total since, reaching 77.8% in 1947. After dropping from a peak of 60% in the early years of Singapore, the Malay population would range between 11 and 16% in the first half of the 20th century, while Indians hovered between 7 and just over 9% in the same period."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "In 1860 how many people were not Chinese in Singapore?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "40000"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Many of the migrants from China in the 19th century came to work on the pepper and Uncaria gambir plantations, with 11,000 Chinese immigrants recorded in one year. Singapore became one of the entry and dispersal points for large number of Chinese and Indian migrants who came to work in the plantations and mines of the Straits Settlements, many of whom then settled in Singapore after their contract ended. By 1860, the total population had reached around 90,000, of these 50,000 were Chinese, and 2,445 Europeans and Eurasians. The first thorough census in Singapore was undertaken in 1871, and the people were grouped into 33 racial, ethnic or national categories, with Chinese forming the largest group at 57.6%. Censuses were then conducted at 10 year intervals afterwards. The 1881 census grouped the people into 6 main categories, and further subdivided into 47 sub-categories. The 6 broad groups were given as Europeans, Eurasians, Malays, Chinese, Indians and Others in 1921. The Malays group includes other natives of the Malay archipelago, the Europeans include Americans, the Indians would be people from the Indian subcontinent including what would now be Pakistan and Bangladesh. In 1901, the total population of Singapore was 228,555, with 15.8% Malays, 71.8% Chinese, 7.8% Indians, and 3.5% Europeans and Eurasians. The Chinese population figure of Singapore has stayed at over 70% of the total since, reaching 77.8% in 1947. After dropping from a peak of 60% in the early years of Singapore, the Malay population would range between 11 and 16% in the first half of the 20th century, while Indians hovered between 7 and just over 9% in the same period."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "In 1871, how many percent of Singapore was not Chinese?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "42.4"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Many of the migrants from China in the 19th century came to work on the pepper and Uncaria gambir plantations, with 11,000 Chinese immigrants recorded in one year. Singapore became one of the entry and dispersal points for large number of Chinese and Indian migrants who came to work in the plantations and mines of the Straits Settlements, many of whom then settled in Singapore after their contract ended. By 1860, the total population had reached around 90,000, of these 50,000 were Chinese, and 2,445 Europeans and Eurasians. The first thorough census in Singapore was undertaken in 1871, and the people were grouped into 33 racial, ethnic or national categories, with Chinese forming the largest group at 57.6%. Censuses were then conducted at 10 year intervals afterwards. The 1881 census grouped the people into 6 main categories, and further subdivided into 47 sub-categories. The 6 broad groups were given as Europeans, Eurasians, Malays, Chinese, Indians and Others in 1921. The Malays group includes other natives of the Malay archipelago, the Europeans include Americans, the Indians would be people from the Indian subcontinent including what would now be Pakistan and Bangladesh. In 1901, the total population of Singapore was 228,555, with 15.8% Malays, 71.8% Chinese, 7.8% Indians, and 3.5% Europeans and Eurasians. The Chinese population figure of Singapore has stayed at over 70% of the total since, reaching 77.8% in 1947. After dropping from a peak of 60% in the early years of Singapore, the Malay population would range between 11 and 16% in the first half of the 20th century, while Indians hovered between 7 and just over 9% in the same period."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many more people were in Singapore in 1901 compared to 1860?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "138555"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Many of the migrants from China in the 19th century came to work on the pepper and Uncaria gambir plantations, with 11,000 Chinese immigrants recorded in one year. Singapore became one of the entry and dispersal points for large number of Chinese and Indian migrants who came to work in the plantations and mines of the Straits Settlements, many of whom then settled in Singapore after their contract ended. By 1860, the total population had reached around 90,000, of these 50,000 were Chinese, and 2,445 Europeans and Eurasians. The first thorough census in Singapore was undertaken in 1871, and the people were grouped into 33 racial, ethnic or national categories, with Chinese forming the largest group at 57.6%. Censuses were then conducted at 10 year intervals afterwards. The 1881 census grouped the people into 6 main categories, and further subdivided into 47 sub-categories. The 6 broad groups were given as Europeans, Eurasians, Malays, Chinese, Indians and Others in 1921. The Malays group includes other natives of the Malay archipelago, the Europeans include Americans, the Indians would be people from the Indian subcontinent including what would now be Pakistan and Bangladesh. In 1901, the total population of Singapore was 228,555, with 15.8% Malays, 71.8% Chinese, 7.8% Indians, and 3.5% Europeans and Eurasians. The Chinese population figure of Singapore has stayed at over 70% of the total since, reaching 77.8% in 1947. After dropping from a peak of 60% in the early years of Singapore, the Malay population would range between 11 and 16% in the first half of the 20th century, while Indians hovered between 7 and just over 9% in the same period."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "In 1901 which group had the smallest percentage of people in Singapore?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Europeans and Eurasians"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Many of the migrants from China in the 19th century came to work on the pepper and Uncaria gambir plantations, with 11,000 Chinese immigrants recorded in one year. Singapore became one of the entry and dispersal points for large number of Chinese and Indian migrants who came to work in the plantations and mines of the Straits Settlements, many of whom then settled in Singapore after their contract ended. By 1860, the total population had reached around 90,000, of these 50,000 were Chinese, and 2,445 Europeans and Eurasians. The first thorough census in Singapore was undertaken in 1871, and the people were grouped into 33 racial, ethnic or national categories, with Chinese forming the largest group at 57.6%. Censuses were then conducted at 10 year intervals afterwards. The 1881 census grouped the people into 6 main categories, and further subdivided into 47 sub-categories. The 6 broad groups were given as Europeans, Eurasians, Malays, Chinese, Indians and Others in 1921. The Malays group includes other natives of the Malay archipelago, the Europeans include Americans, the Indians would be people from the Indian subcontinent including what would now be Pakistan and Bangladesh. In 1901, the total population of Singapore was 228,555, with 15.8% Malays, 71.8% Chinese, 7.8% Indians, and 3.5% Europeans and Eurasians. The Chinese population figure of Singapore has stayed at over 70% of the total since, reaching 77.8% in 1947. After dropping from a peak of 60% in the early years of Singapore, the Malay population would range between 11 and 16% in the first half of the 20th century, while Indians hovered between 7 and just over 9% in the same period."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many more percent of people did the Chinese have compared with the Malays in 1901?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "56"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Many of the migrants from China in the 19th century came to work on the pepper and Uncaria gambir plantations, with 11,000 Chinese immigrants recorded in one year. Singapore became one of the entry and dispersal points for large number of Chinese and Indian migrants who came to work in the plantations and mines of the Straits Settlements, many of whom then settled in Singapore after their contract ended. By 1860, the total population had reached around 90,000, of these 50,000 were Chinese, and 2,445 Europeans and Eurasians. The first thorough census in Singapore was undertaken in 1871, and the people were grouped into 33 racial, ethnic or national categories, with Chinese forming the largest group at 57.6%. Censuses were then conducted at 10 year intervals afterwards. The 1881 census grouped the people into 6 main categories, and further subdivided into 47 sub-categories. The 6 broad groups were given as Europeans, Eurasians, Malays, Chinese, Indians and Others in 1921. The Malays group includes other natives of the Malay archipelago, the Europeans include Americans, the Indians would be people from the Indian subcontinent including what would now be Pakistan and Bangladesh. In 1901, the total population of Singapore was 228,555, with 15.8% Malays, 71.8% Chinese, 7.8% Indians, and 3.5% Europeans and Eurasians. The Chinese population figure of Singapore has stayed at over 70% of the total since, reaching 77.8% in 1947. After dropping from a peak of 60% in the early years of Singapore, the Malay population would range between 11 and 16% in the first half of the 20th century, while Indians hovered between 7 and just over 9% in the same period."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which ancestry was originally the largest in Singapore?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Malay"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Many of the migrants from China in the 19th century came to work on the pepper and Uncaria gambir plantations, with 11,000 Chinese immigrants recorded in one year. Singapore became one of the entry and dispersal points for large number of Chinese and Indian migrants who came to work in the plantations and mines of the Straits Settlements, many of whom then settled in Singapore after their contract ended. By 1860, the total population had reached around 90,000, of these 50,000 were Chinese, and 2,445 Europeans and Eurasians. The first thorough census in Singapore was undertaken in 1871, and the people were grouped into 33 racial, ethnic or national categories, with Chinese forming the largest group at 57.6%. Censuses were then conducted at 10 year intervals afterwards. The 1881 census grouped the people into 6 main categories, and further subdivided into 47 sub-categories. The 6 broad groups were given as Europeans, Eurasians, Malays, Chinese, Indians and Others in 1921. The Malays group includes other natives of the Malay archipelago, the Europeans include Americans, the Indians would be people from the Indian subcontinent including what would now be Pakistan and Bangladesh. In 1901, the total population of Singapore was 228,555, with 15.8% Malays, 71.8% Chinese, 7.8% Indians, and 3.5% Europeans and Eurasians. The Chinese population figure of Singapore has stayed at over 70% of the total since, reaching 77.8% in 1947. After dropping from a peak of 60% in the early years of Singapore, the Malay population would range between 11 and 16% in the first half of the 20th century, while Indians hovered between 7 and just over 9% in the same period."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many more percentage of people in Singapore are Chinese than Malays?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "56"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Many of the migrants from China in the 19th century came to work on the pepper and Uncaria gambir plantations, with 11,000 Chinese immigrants recorded in one year. Singapore became one of the entry and dispersal points for large number of Chinese and Indian migrants who came to work in the plantations and mines of the Straits Settlements, many of whom then settled in Singapore after their contract ended. By 1860, the total population had reached around 90,000, of these 50,000 were Chinese, and 2,445 Europeans and Eurasians. The first thorough census in Singapore was undertaken in 1871, and the people were grouped into 33 racial, ethnic or national categories, with Chinese forming the largest group at 57.6%. Censuses were then conducted at 10 year intervals afterwards. The 1881 census grouped the people into 6 main categories, and further subdivided into 47 sub-categories. The 6 broad groups were given as Europeans, Eurasians, Malays, Chinese, Indians and Others in 1921. The Malays group includes other natives of the Malay archipelago, the Europeans include Americans, the Indians would be people from the Indian subcontinent including what would now be Pakistan and Bangladesh. In 1901, the total population of Singapore was 228,555, with 15.8% Malays, 71.8% Chinese, 7.8% Indians, and 3.5% Europeans and Eurasians. The Chinese population figure of Singapore has stayed at over 70% of the total since, reaching 77.8% in 1947. After dropping from a peak of 60% in the early years of Singapore, the Malay population would range between 11 and 16% in the first half of the 20th century, while Indians hovered between 7 and just over 9% in the same period."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which race has the smallest percentage in Singapore, Chinese or European?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "European"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Many of the migrants from China in the 19th century came to work on the pepper and Uncaria gambir plantations, with 11,000 Chinese immigrants recorded in one year. Singapore became one of the entry and dispersal points for large number of Chinese and Indian migrants who came to work in the plantations and mines of the Straits Settlements, many of whom then settled in Singapore after their contract ended. By 1860, the total population had reached around 90,000, of these 50,000 were Chinese, and 2,445 Europeans and Eurasians. The first thorough census in Singapore was undertaken in 1871, and the people were grouped into 33 racial, ethnic or national categories, with Chinese forming the largest group at 57.6%. Censuses were then conducted at 10 year intervals afterwards. The 1881 census grouped the people into 6 main categories, and further subdivided into 47 sub-categories. The 6 broad groups were given as Europeans, Eurasians, Malays, Chinese, Indians and Others in 1921. The Malays group includes other natives of the Malay archipelago, the Europeans include Americans, the Indians would be people from the Indian subcontinent including what would now be Pakistan and Bangladesh. In 1901, the total population of Singapore was 228,555, with 15.8% Malays, 71.8% Chinese, 7.8% Indians, and 3.5% Europeans and Eurasians. The Chinese population figure of Singapore has stayed at over 70% of the total since, reaching 77.8% in 1947. After dropping from a peak of 60% in the early years of Singapore, the Malay population would range between 11 and 16% in the first half of the 20th century, while Indians hovered between 7 and just over 9% in the same period."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many more Chinese than Europeans living in China?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "47555"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Many of the migrants from China in the 19th century came to work on the pepper and Uncaria gambir plantations, with 11,000 Chinese immigrants recorded in one year. Singapore became one of the entry and dispersal points for large number of Chinese and Indian migrants who came to work in the plantations and mines of the Straits Settlements, many of whom then settled in Singapore after their contract ended. By 1860, the total population had reached around 90,000, of these 50,000 were Chinese, and 2,445 Europeans and Eurasians. The first thorough census in Singapore was undertaken in 1871, and the people were grouped into 33 racial, ethnic or national categories, with Chinese forming the largest group at 57.6%. Censuses were then conducted at 10 year intervals afterwards. The 1881 census grouped the people into 6 main categories, and further subdivided into 47 sub-categories. The 6 broad groups were given as Europeans, Eurasians, Malays, Chinese, Indians and Others in 1921. The Malays group includes other natives of the Malay archipelago, the Europeans include Americans, the Indians would be people from the Indian subcontinent including what would now be Pakistan and Bangladesh. In 1901, the total population of Singapore was 228,555, with 15.8% Malays, 71.8% Chinese, 7.8% Indians, and 3.5% Europeans and Eurasians. The Chinese population figure of Singapore has stayed at over 70% of the total since, reaching 77.8% in 1947. After dropping from a peak of 60% in the early years of Singapore, the Malay population would range between 11 and 16% in the first half of the 20th century, while Indians hovered between 7 and just over 9% in the same period."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many more percent did the Malay population have than the Indians in the first half of century?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "7"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Many of the migrants from China in the 19th century came to work on the pepper and Uncaria gambir plantations, with 11,000 Chinese immigrants recorded in one year. Singapore became one of the entry and dispersal points for large number of Chinese and Indian migrants who came to work in the plantations and mines of the Straits Settlements, many of whom then settled in Singapore after their contract ended. By 1860, the total population had reached around 90,000, of these 50,000 were Chinese, and 2,445 Europeans and Eurasians. The first thorough census in Singapore was undertaken in 1871, and the people were grouped into 33 racial, ethnic or national categories, with Chinese forming the largest group at 57.6%. Censuses were then conducted at 10 year intervals afterwards. The 1881 census grouped the people into 6 main categories, and further subdivided into 47 sub-categories. The 6 broad groups were given as Europeans, Eurasians, Malays, Chinese, Indians and Others in 1921. The Malays group includes other natives of the Malay archipelago, the Europeans include Americans, the Indians would be people from the Indian subcontinent including what would now be Pakistan and Bangladesh. In 1901, the total population of Singapore was 228,555, with 15.8% Malays, 71.8% Chinese, 7.8% Indians, and 3.5% Europeans and Eurasians. The Chinese population figure of Singapore has stayed at over 70% of the total since, reaching 77.8% in 1947. After dropping from a peak of 60% in the early years of Singapore, the Malay population would range between 11 and 16% in the first half of the 20th century, while Indians hovered between 7 and just over 9% in the same period."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many more percent Indians are there than Eurasians?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "4.3"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Many of the migrants from China in the 19th century came to work on the pepper and Uncaria gambir plantations, with 11,000 Chinese immigrants recorded in one year. Singapore became one of the entry and dispersal points for large number of Chinese and Indian migrants who came to work in the plantations and mines of the Straits Settlements, many of whom then settled in Singapore after their contract ended. By 1860, the total population had reached around 90,000, of these 50,000 were Chinese, and 2,445 Europeans and Eurasians. The first thorough census in Singapore was undertaken in 1871, and the people were grouped into 33 racial, ethnic or national categories, with Chinese forming the largest group at 57.6%. Censuses were then conducted at 10 year intervals afterwards. The 1881 census grouped the people into 6 main categories, and further subdivided into 47 sub-categories. The 6 broad groups were given as Europeans, Eurasians, Malays, Chinese, Indians and Others in 1921. The Malays group includes other natives of the Malay archipelago, the Europeans include Americans, the Indians would be people from the Indian subcontinent including what would now be Pakistan and Bangladesh. In 1901, the total population of Singapore was 228,555, with 15.8% Malays, 71.8% Chinese, 7.8% Indians, and 3.5% Europeans and Eurasians. The Chinese population figure of Singapore has stayed at over 70% of the total since, reaching 77.8% in 1947. After dropping from a peak of 60% in the early years of Singapore, the Malay population would range between 11 and 16% in the first half of the 20th century, while Indians hovered between 7 and just over 9% in the same period."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many more Chinese in 1860 than Europeans and Eurasians?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "47555"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Many of the migrants from China in the 19th century came to work on the pepper and Uncaria gambir plantations, with 11,000 Chinese immigrants recorded in one year. Singapore became one of the entry and dispersal points for large number of Chinese and Indian migrants who came to work in the plantations and mines of the Straits Settlements, many of whom then settled in Singapore after their contract ended. By 1860, the total population had reached around 90,000, of these 50,000 were Chinese, and 2,445 Europeans and Eurasians. The first thorough census in Singapore was undertaken in 1871, and the people were grouped into 33 racial, ethnic or national categories, with Chinese forming the largest group at 57.6%. Censuses were then conducted at 10 year intervals afterwards. The 1881 census grouped the people into 6 main categories, and further subdivided into 47 sub-categories. The 6 broad groups were given as Europeans, Eurasians, Malays, Chinese, Indians and Others in 1921. The Malays group includes other natives of the Malay archipelago, the Europeans include Americans, the Indians would be people from the Indian subcontinent including what would now be Pakistan and Bangladesh. In 1901, the total population of Singapore was 228,555, with 15.8% Malays, 71.8% Chinese, 7.8% Indians, and 3.5% Europeans and Eurasians. The Chinese population figure of Singapore has stayed at over 70% of the total since, reaching 77.8% in 1947. After dropping from a peak of 60% in the early years of Singapore, the Malay population would range between 11 and 16% in the first half of the 20th century, while Indians hovered between 7 and just over 9% in the same period."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many more percentage of Chinese than Malays in Singapore?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "56"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Many of the migrants from China in the 19th century came to work on the pepper and Uncaria gambir plantations, with 11,000 Chinese immigrants recorded in one year. Singapore became one of the entry and dispersal points for large number of Chinese and Indian migrants who came to work in the plantations and mines of the Straits Settlements, many of whom then settled in Singapore after their contract ended. By 1860, the total population had reached around 90,000, of these 50,000 were Chinese, and 2,445 Europeans and Eurasians. The first thorough census in Singapore was undertaken in 1871, and the people were grouped into 33 racial, ethnic or national categories, with Chinese forming the largest group at 57.6%. Censuses were then conducted at 10 year intervals afterwards. The 1881 census grouped the people into 6 main categories, and further subdivided into 47 sub-categories. The 6 broad groups were given as Europeans, Eurasians, Malays, Chinese, Indians and Others in 1921. The Malays group includes other natives of the Malay archipelago, the Europeans include Americans, the Indians would be people from the Indian subcontinent including what would now be Pakistan and Bangladesh. In 1901, the total population of Singapore was 228,555, with 15.8% Malays, 71.8% Chinese, 7.8% Indians, and 3.5% Europeans and Eurasians. The Chinese population figure of Singapore has stayed at over 70% of the total since, reaching 77.8% in 1947. After dropping from a peak of 60% in the early years of Singapore, the Malay population would range between 11 and 16% in the first half of the 20th century, while Indians hovered between 7 and just over 9% in the same period."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "In 1860 Singapore how many people were neither Chinese, Europeans or Eurasians?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "37555"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Many of the migrants from China in the 19th century came to work on the pepper and Uncaria gambir plantations, with 11,000 Chinese immigrants recorded in one year. Singapore became one of the entry and dispersal points for large number of Chinese and Indian migrants who came to work in the plantations and mines of the Straits Settlements, many of whom then settled in Singapore after their contract ended. By 1860, the total population had reached around 90,000, of these 50,000 were Chinese, and 2,445 Europeans and Eurasians. The first thorough census in Singapore was undertaken in 1871, and the people were grouped into 33 racial, ethnic or national categories, with Chinese forming the largest group at 57.6%. Censuses were then conducted at 10 year intervals afterwards. The 1881 census grouped the people into 6 main categories, and further subdivided into 47 sub-categories. The 6 broad groups were given as Europeans, Eurasians, Malays, Chinese, Indians and Others in 1921. The Malays group includes other natives of the Malay archipelago, the Europeans include Americans, the Indians would be people from the Indian subcontinent including what would now be Pakistan and Bangladesh. In 1901, the total population of Singapore was 228,555, with 15.8% Malays, 71.8% Chinese, 7.8% Indians, and 3.5% Europeans and Eurasians. The Chinese population figure of Singapore has stayed at over 70% of the total since, reaching 77.8% in 1947. After dropping from a peak of 60% in the early years of Singapore, the Malay population would range between 11 and 16% in the first half of the 20th century, while Indians hovered between 7 and just over 9% in the same period."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many people did Singapore grow by between 1860 and 1901?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "138555"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Many of the migrants from China in the 19th century came to work on the pepper and Uncaria gambir plantations, with 11,000 Chinese immigrants recorded in one year. Singapore became one of the entry and dispersal points for large number of Chinese and Indian migrants who came to work in the plantations and mines of the Straits Settlements, many of whom then settled in Singapore after their contract ended. By 1860, the total population had reached around 90,000, of these 50,000 were Chinese, and 2,445 Europeans and Eurasians. The first thorough census in Singapore was undertaken in 1871, and the people were grouped into 33 racial, ethnic or national categories, with Chinese forming the largest group at 57.6%. Censuses were then conducted at 10 year intervals afterwards. The 1881 census grouped the people into 6 main categories, and further subdivided into 47 sub-categories. The 6 broad groups were given as Europeans, Eurasians, Malays, Chinese, Indians and Others in 1921. The Malays group includes other natives of the Malay archipelago, the Europeans include Americans, the Indians would be people from the Indian subcontinent including what would now be Pakistan and Bangladesh. In 1901, the total population of Singapore was 228,555, with 15.8% Malays, 71.8% Chinese, 7.8% Indians, and 3.5% Europeans and Eurasians. The Chinese population figure of Singapore has stayed at over 70% of the total since, reaching 77.8% in 1947. After dropping from a peak of 60% in the early years of Singapore, the Malay population would range between 11 and 16% in the first half of the 20th century, while Indians hovered between 7 and just over 9% in the same period."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "What was the second largest racial group in Singapore in 1901?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Malays"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Many of the migrants from China in the 19th century came to work on the pepper and Uncaria gambir plantations, with 11,000 Chinese immigrants recorded in one year. Singapore became one of the entry and dispersal points for large number of Chinese and Indian migrants who came to work in the plantations and mines of the Straits Settlements, many of whom then settled in Singapore after their contract ended. By 1860, the total population had reached around 90,000, of these 50,000 were Chinese, and 2,445 Europeans and Eurasians. The first thorough census in Singapore was undertaken in 1871, and the people were grouped into 33 racial, ethnic or national categories, with Chinese forming the largest group at 57.6%. Censuses were then conducted at 10 year intervals afterwards. The 1881 census grouped the people into 6 main categories, and further subdivided into 47 sub-categories. The 6 broad groups were given as Europeans, Eurasians, Malays, Chinese, Indians and Others in 1921. The Malays group includes other natives of the Malay archipelago, the Europeans include Americans, the Indians would be people from the Indian subcontinent including what would now be Pakistan and Bangladesh. In 1901, the total population of Singapore was 228,555, with 15.8% Malays, 71.8% Chinese, 7.8% Indians, and 3.5% Europeans and Eurasians. The Chinese population figure of Singapore has stayed at over 70% of the total since, reaching 77.8% in 1947. After dropping from a peak of 60% in the early years of Singapore, the Malay population would range between 11 and 16% in the first half of the 20th century, while Indians hovered between 7 and just over 9% in the same period."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many percent did the Malays, Indians, and Europeans and Eurasians make up in 1901?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "27.1"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Many of the migrants from China in the 19th century came to work on the pepper and Uncaria gambir plantations, with 11,000 Chinese immigrants recorded in one year. Singapore became one of the entry and dispersal points for large number of Chinese and Indian migrants who came to work in the plantations and mines of the Straits Settlements, many of whom then settled in Singapore after their contract ended. By 1860, the total population had reached around 90,000, of these 50,000 were Chinese, and 2,445 Europeans and Eurasians. The first thorough census in Singapore was undertaken in 1871, and the people were grouped into 33 racial, ethnic or national categories, with Chinese forming the largest group at 57.6%. Censuses were then conducted at 10 year intervals afterwards. The 1881 census grouped the people into 6 main categories, and further subdivided into 47 sub-categories. The 6 broad groups were given as Europeans, Eurasians, Malays, Chinese, Indians and Others in 1921. The Malays group includes other natives of the Malay archipelago, the Europeans include Americans, the Indians would be people from the Indian subcontinent including what would now be Pakistan and Bangladesh. In 1901, the total population of Singapore was 228,555, with 15.8% Malays, 71.8% Chinese, 7.8% Indians, and 3.5% Europeans and Eurasians. The Chinese population figure of Singapore has stayed at over 70% of the total since, reaching 77.8% in 1947. After dropping from a peak of 60% in the early years of Singapore, the Malay population would range between 11 and 16% in the first half of the 20th century, while Indians hovered between 7 and just over 9% in the same period."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many more Chinese were there living in Singapore in 1860 compared to Europeans and Eurasians?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "47555"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Many of the migrants from China in the 19th century came to work on the pepper and Uncaria gambir plantations, with 11,000 Chinese immigrants recorded in one year. Singapore became one of the entry and dispersal points for large number of Chinese and Indian migrants who came to work in the plantations and mines of the Straits Settlements, many of whom then settled in Singapore after their contract ended. By 1860, the total population had reached around 90,000, of these 50,000 were Chinese, and 2,445 Europeans and Eurasians. The first thorough census in Singapore was undertaken in 1871, and the people were grouped into 33 racial, ethnic or national categories, with Chinese forming the largest group at 57.6%. Censuses were then conducted at 10 year intervals afterwards. The 1881 census grouped the people into 6 main categories, and further subdivided into 47 sub-categories. The 6 broad groups were given as Europeans, Eurasians, Malays, Chinese, Indians and Others in 1921. The Malays group includes other natives of the Malay archipelago, the Europeans include Americans, the Indians would be people from the Indian subcontinent including what would now be Pakistan and Bangladesh. In 1901, the total population of Singapore was 228,555, with 15.8% Malays, 71.8% Chinese, 7.8% Indians, and 3.5% Europeans and Eurasians. The Chinese population figure of Singapore has stayed at over 70% of the total since, reaching 77.8% in 1947. After dropping from a peak of 60% in the early years of Singapore, the Malay population would range between 11 and 16% in the first half of the 20th century, while Indians hovered between 7 and just over 9% in the same period."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which were there more of in Singapore in 1901, Malays or Indians?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Malays"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Many of the migrants from China in the 19th century came to work on the pepper and Uncaria gambir plantations, with 11,000 Chinese immigrants recorded in one year. Singapore became one of the entry and dispersal points for large number of Chinese and Indian migrants who came to work in the plantations and mines of the Straits Settlements, many of whom then settled in Singapore after their contract ended. By 1860, the total population had reached around 90,000, of these 50,000 were Chinese, and 2,445 Europeans and Eurasians. The first thorough census in Singapore was undertaken in 1871, and the people were grouped into 33 racial, ethnic or national categories, with Chinese forming the largest group at 57.6%. Censuses were then conducted at 10 year intervals afterwards. The 1881 census grouped the people into 6 main categories, and further subdivided into 47 sub-categories. The 6 broad groups were given as Europeans, Eurasians, Malays, Chinese, Indians and Others in 1921. The Malays group includes other natives of the Malay archipelago, the Europeans include Americans, the Indians would be people from the Indian subcontinent including what would now be Pakistan and Bangladesh. In 1901, the total population of Singapore was 228,555, with 15.8% Malays, 71.8% Chinese, 7.8% Indians, and 3.5% Europeans and Eurasians. The Chinese population figure of Singapore has stayed at over 70% of the total since, reaching 77.8% in 1947. After dropping from a peak of 60% in the early years of Singapore, the Malay population would range between 11 and 16% in the first half of the 20th century, while Indians hovered between 7 and just over 9% in the same period."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many percent were not Chinese?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "42.4"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Many of the migrants from China in the 19th century came to work on the pepper and Uncaria gambir plantations, with 11,000 Chinese immigrants recorded in one year. Singapore became one of the entry and dispersal points for large number of Chinese and Indian migrants who came to work in the plantations and mines of the Straits Settlements, many of whom then settled in Singapore after their contract ended. By 1860, the total population had reached around 90,000, of these 50,000 were Chinese, and 2,445 Europeans and Eurasians. The first thorough census in Singapore was undertaken in 1871, and the people were grouped into 33 racial, ethnic or national categories, with Chinese forming the largest group at 57.6%. Censuses were then conducted at 10 year intervals afterwards. The 1881 census grouped the people into 6 main categories, and further subdivided into 47 sub-categories. The 6 broad groups were given as Europeans, Eurasians, Malays, Chinese, Indians and Others in 1921. The Malays group includes other natives of the Malay archipelago, the Europeans include Americans, the Indians would be people from the Indian subcontinent including what would now be Pakistan and Bangladesh. In 1901, the total population of Singapore was 228,555, with 15.8% Malays, 71.8% Chinese, 7.8% Indians, and 3.5% Europeans and Eurasians. The Chinese population figure of Singapore has stayed at over 70% of the total since, reaching 77.8% in 1947. After dropping from a peak of 60% in the early years of Singapore, the Malay population would range between 11 and 16% in the first half of the 20th century, while Indians hovered between 7 and just over 9% in the same period."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many percent were not Chinese in 1901?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "28.2"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Many of the migrants from China in the 19th century came to work on the pepper and Uncaria gambir plantations, with 11,000 Chinese immigrants recorded in one year. Singapore became one of the entry and dispersal points for large number of Chinese and Indian migrants who came to work in the plantations and mines of the Straits Settlements, many of whom then settled in Singapore after their contract ended. By 1860, the total population had reached around 90,000, of these 50,000 were Chinese, and 2,445 Europeans and Eurasians. The first thorough census in Singapore was undertaken in 1871, and the people were grouped into 33 racial, ethnic or national categories, with Chinese forming the largest group at 57.6%. Censuses were then conducted at 10 year intervals afterwards. The 1881 census grouped the people into 6 main categories, and further subdivided into 47 sub-categories. The 6 broad groups were given as Europeans, Eurasians, Malays, Chinese, Indians and Others in 1921. The Malays group includes other natives of the Malay archipelago, the Europeans include Americans, the Indians would be people from the Indian subcontinent including what would now be Pakistan and Bangladesh. In 1901, the total population of Singapore was 228,555, with 15.8% Malays, 71.8% Chinese, 7.8% Indians, and 3.5% Europeans and Eurasians. The Chinese population figure of Singapore has stayed at over 70% of the total since, reaching 77.8% in 1947. After dropping from a peak of 60% in the early years of Singapore, the Malay population would range between 11 and 16% in the first half of the 20th century, while Indians hovered between 7 and just over 9% in the same period."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many percent were not Chinese in 1947?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "22.2"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Many of the migrants from China in the 19th century came to work on the pepper and Uncaria gambir plantations, with 11,000 Chinese immigrants recorded in one year. Singapore became one of the entry and dispersal points for large number of Chinese and Indian migrants who came to work in the plantations and mines of the Straits Settlements, many of whom then settled in Singapore after their contract ended. By 1860, the total population had reached around 90,000, of these 50,000 were Chinese, and 2,445 Europeans and Eurasians. The first thorough census in Singapore was undertaken in 1871, and the people were grouped into 33 racial, ethnic or national categories, with Chinese forming the largest group at 57.6%. Censuses were then conducted at 10 year intervals afterwards. The 1881 census grouped the people into 6 main categories, and further subdivided into 47 sub-categories. The 6 broad groups were given as Europeans, Eurasians, Malays, Chinese, Indians and Others in 1921. The Malays group includes other natives of the Malay archipelago, the Europeans include Americans, the Indians would be people from the Indian subcontinent including what would now be Pakistan and Bangladesh. In 1901, the total population of Singapore was 228,555, with 15.8% Malays, 71.8% Chinese, 7.8% Indians, and 3.5% Europeans and Eurasians. The Chinese population figure of Singapore has stayed at over 70% of the total since, reaching 77.8% in 1947. After dropping from a peak of 60% in the early years of Singapore, the Malay population would range between 11 and 16% in the first half of the 20th century, while Indians hovered between 7 and just over 9% in the same period."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many percent were not Malays in 1901?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "84.2"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Many of the migrants from China in the 19th century came to work on the pepper and Uncaria gambir plantations, with 11,000 Chinese immigrants recorded in one year. Singapore became one of the entry and dispersal points for large number of Chinese and Indian migrants who came to work in the plantations and mines of the Straits Settlements, many of whom then settled in Singapore after their contract ended. By 1860, the total population had reached around 90,000, of these 50,000 were Chinese, and 2,445 Europeans and Eurasians. The first thorough census in Singapore was undertaken in 1871, and the people were grouped into 33 racial, ethnic or national categories, with Chinese forming the largest group at 57.6%. Censuses were then conducted at 10 year intervals afterwards. The 1881 census grouped the people into 6 main categories, and further subdivided into 47 sub-categories. The 6 broad groups were given as Europeans, Eurasians, Malays, Chinese, Indians and Others in 1921. The Malays group includes other natives of the Malay archipelago, the Europeans include Americans, the Indians would be people from the Indian subcontinent including what would now be Pakistan and Bangladesh. In 1901, the total population of Singapore was 228,555, with 15.8% Malays, 71.8% Chinese, 7.8% Indians, and 3.5% Europeans and Eurasians. The Chinese population figure of Singapore has stayed at over 70% of the total since, reaching 77.8% in 1947. After dropping from a peak of 60% in the early years of Singapore, the Malay population would range between 11 and 16% in the first half of the 20th century, while Indians hovered between 7 and just over 9% in the same period."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many percent were not Indians in 1901?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "92.2"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Many of the migrants from China in the 19th century came to work on the pepper and Uncaria gambir plantations, with 11,000 Chinese immigrants recorded in one year. Singapore became one of the entry and dispersal points for large number of Chinese and Indian migrants who came to work in the plantations and mines of the Straits Settlements, many of whom then settled in Singapore after their contract ended. By 1860, the total population had reached around 90,000, of these 50,000 were Chinese, and 2,445 Europeans and Eurasians. The first thorough census in Singapore was undertaken in 1871, and the people were grouped into 33 racial, ethnic or national categories, with Chinese forming the largest group at 57.6%. Censuses were then conducted at 10 year intervals afterwards. The 1881 census grouped the people into 6 main categories, and further subdivided into 47 sub-categories. The 6 broad groups were given as Europeans, Eurasians, Malays, Chinese, Indians and Others in 1921. The Malays group includes other natives of the Malay archipelago, the Europeans include Americans, the Indians would be people from the Indian subcontinent including what would now be Pakistan and Bangladesh. In 1901, the total population of Singapore was 228,555, with 15.8% Malays, 71.8% Chinese, 7.8% Indians, and 3.5% Europeans and Eurasians. The Chinese population figure of Singapore has stayed at over 70% of the total since, reaching 77.8% in 1947. After dropping from a peak of 60% in the early years of Singapore, the Malay population would range between 11 and 16% in the first half of the 20th century, while Indians hovered between 7 and just over 9% in the same period."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many percent were not Europeans and Eurasians in 1901?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "96.5"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Many of the migrants from China in the 19th century came to work on the pepper and Uncaria gambir plantations, with 11,000 Chinese immigrants recorded in one year. Singapore became one of the entry and dispersal points for large number of Chinese and Indian migrants who came to work in the plantations and mines of the Straits Settlements, many of whom then settled in Singapore after their contract ended. By 1860, the total population had reached around 90,000, of these 50,000 were Chinese, and 2,445 Europeans and Eurasians. The first thorough census in Singapore was undertaken in 1871, and the people were grouped into 33 racial, ethnic or national categories, with Chinese forming the largest group at 57.6%. Censuses were then conducted at 10 year intervals afterwards. The 1881 census grouped the people into 6 main categories, and further subdivided into 47 sub-categories. The 6 broad groups were given as Europeans, Eurasians, Malays, Chinese, Indians and Others in 1921. The Malays group includes other natives of the Malay archipelago, the Europeans include Americans, the Indians would be people from the Indian subcontinent including what would now be Pakistan and Bangladesh. In 1901, the total population of Singapore was 228,555, with 15.8% Malays, 71.8% Chinese, 7.8% Indians, and 3.5% Europeans and Eurasians. The Chinese population figure of Singapore has stayed at over 70% of the total since, reaching 77.8% in 1947. After dropping from a peak of 60% in the early years of Singapore, the Malay population would range between 11 and 16% in the first half of the 20th century, while Indians hovered between 7 and just over 9% in the same period."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many percent were not Malays in the early years?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "40"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Many of the migrants from China in the 19th century came to work on the pepper and Uncaria gambir plantations, with 11,000 Chinese immigrants recorded in one year. Singapore became one of the entry and dispersal points for large number of Chinese and Indian migrants who came to work in the plantations and mines of the Straits Settlements, many of whom then settled in Singapore after their contract ended. By 1860, the total population had reached around 90,000, of these 50,000 were Chinese, and 2,445 Europeans and Eurasians. The first thorough census in Singapore was undertaken in 1871, and the people were grouped into 33 racial, ethnic or national categories, with Chinese forming the largest group at 57.6%. Censuses were then conducted at 10 year intervals afterwards. The 1881 census grouped the people into 6 main categories, and further subdivided into 47 sub-categories. The 6 broad groups were given as Europeans, Eurasians, Malays, Chinese, Indians and Others in 1921. The Malays group includes other natives of the Malay archipelago, the Europeans include Americans, the Indians would be people from the Indian subcontinent including what would now be Pakistan and Bangladesh. In 1901, the total population of Singapore was 228,555, with 15.8% Malays, 71.8% Chinese, 7.8% Indians, and 3.5% Europeans and Eurasians. The Chinese population figure of Singapore has stayed at over 70% of the total since, reaching 77.8% in 1947. After dropping from a peak of 60% in the early years of Singapore, the Malay population would range between 11 and 16% in the first half of the 20th century, while Indians hovered between 7 and just over 9% in the same period."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many more percent were Chinese than Malays in 1901?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "56"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Many of the migrants from China in the 19th century came to work on the pepper and Uncaria gambir plantations, with 11,000 Chinese immigrants recorded in one year. Singapore became one of the entry and dispersal points for large number of Chinese and Indian migrants who came to work in the plantations and mines of the Straits Settlements, many of whom then settled in Singapore after their contract ended. By 1860, the total population had reached around 90,000, of these 50,000 were Chinese, and 2,445 Europeans and Eurasians. The first thorough census in Singapore was undertaken in 1871, and the people were grouped into 33 racial, ethnic or national categories, with Chinese forming the largest group at 57.6%. Censuses were then conducted at 10 year intervals afterwards. The 1881 census grouped the people into 6 main categories, and further subdivided into 47 sub-categories. The 6 broad groups were given as Europeans, Eurasians, Malays, Chinese, Indians and Others in 1921. The Malays group includes other natives of the Malay archipelago, the Europeans include Americans, the Indians would be people from the Indian subcontinent including what would now be Pakistan and Bangladesh. In 1901, the total population of Singapore was 228,555, with 15.8% Malays, 71.8% Chinese, 7.8% Indians, and 3.5% Europeans and Eurasians. The Chinese population figure of Singapore has stayed at over 70% of the total since, reaching 77.8% in 1947. After dropping from a peak of 60% in the early years of Singapore, the Malay population would range between 11 and 16% in the first half of the 20th century, while Indians hovered between 7 and just over 9% in the same period."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many more percent were Chinese than Indians in 1901?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "64"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Many of the migrants from China in the 19th century came to work on the pepper and Uncaria gambir plantations, with 11,000 Chinese immigrants recorded in one year. Singapore became one of the entry and dispersal points for large number of Chinese and Indian migrants who came to work in the plantations and mines of the Straits Settlements, many of whom then settled in Singapore after their contract ended. By 1860, the total population had reached around 90,000, of these 50,000 were Chinese, and 2,445 Europeans and Eurasians. The first thorough census in Singapore was undertaken in 1871, and the people were grouped into 33 racial, ethnic or national categories, with Chinese forming the largest group at 57.6%. Censuses were then conducted at 10 year intervals afterwards. The 1881 census grouped the people into 6 main categories, and further subdivided into 47 sub-categories. The 6 broad groups were given as Europeans, Eurasians, Malays, Chinese, Indians and Others in 1921. The Malays group includes other natives of the Malay archipelago, the Europeans include Americans, the Indians would be people from the Indian subcontinent including what would now be Pakistan and Bangladesh. In 1901, the total population of Singapore was 228,555, with 15.8% Malays, 71.8% Chinese, 7.8% Indians, and 3.5% Europeans and Eurasians. The Chinese population figure of Singapore has stayed at over 70% of the total since, reaching 77.8% in 1947. After dropping from a peak of 60% in the early years of Singapore, the Malay population would range between 11 and 16% in the first half of the 20th century, while Indians hovered between 7 and just over 9% in the same period."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many more percent were Chinese than Europeans and Eurasians in 1901?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "68.3"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Many of the migrants from China in the 19th century came to work on the pepper and Uncaria gambir plantations, with 11,000 Chinese immigrants recorded in one year. Singapore became one of the entry and dispersal points for large number of Chinese and Indian migrants who came to work in the plantations and mines of the Straits Settlements, many of whom then settled in Singapore after their contract ended. By 1860, the total population had reached around 90,000, of these 50,000 were Chinese, and 2,445 Europeans and Eurasians. The first thorough census in Singapore was undertaken in 1871, and the people were grouped into 33 racial, ethnic or national categories, with Chinese forming the largest group at 57.6%. Censuses were then conducted at 10 year intervals afterwards. The 1881 census grouped the people into 6 main categories, and further subdivided into 47 sub-categories. The 6 broad groups were given as Europeans, Eurasians, Malays, Chinese, Indians and Others in 1921. The Malays group includes other natives of the Malay archipelago, the Europeans include Americans, the Indians would be people from the Indian subcontinent including what would now be Pakistan and Bangladesh. In 1901, the total population of Singapore was 228,555, with 15.8% Malays, 71.8% Chinese, 7.8% Indians, and 3.5% Europeans and Eurasians. The Chinese population figure of Singapore has stayed at over 70% of the total since, reaching 77.8% in 1947. After dropping from a peak of 60% in the early years of Singapore, the Malay population would range between 11 and 16% in the first half of the 20th century, while Indians hovered between 7 and just over 9% in the same period."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many more percent were Malays than Indians in 1901?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "8"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Many of the migrants from China in the 19th century came to work on the pepper and Uncaria gambir plantations, with 11,000 Chinese immigrants recorded in one year. Singapore became one of the entry and dispersal points for large number of Chinese and Indian migrants who came to work in the plantations and mines of the Straits Settlements, many of whom then settled in Singapore after their contract ended. By 1860, the total population had reached around 90,000, of these 50,000 were Chinese, and 2,445 Europeans and Eurasians. The first thorough census in Singapore was undertaken in 1871, and the people were grouped into 33 racial, ethnic or national categories, with Chinese forming the largest group at 57.6%. Censuses were then conducted at 10 year intervals afterwards. The 1881 census grouped the people into 6 main categories, and further subdivided into 47 sub-categories. The 6 broad groups were given as Europeans, Eurasians, Malays, Chinese, Indians and Others in 1921. The Malays group includes other natives of the Malay archipelago, the Europeans include Americans, the Indians would be people from the Indian subcontinent including what would now be Pakistan and Bangladesh. In 1901, the total population of Singapore was 228,555, with 15.8% Malays, 71.8% Chinese, 7.8% Indians, and 3.5% Europeans and Eurasians. The Chinese population figure of Singapore has stayed at over 70% of the total since, reaching 77.8% in 1947. After dropping from a peak of 60% in the early years of Singapore, the Malay population would range between 11 and 16% in the first half of the 20th century, while Indians hovered between 7 and just over 9% in the same period."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many more percent were Malays than Europeans and Eurasians in 1901?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "12.3"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Many of the migrants from China in the 19th century came to work on the pepper and Uncaria gambir plantations, with 11,000 Chinese immigrants recorded in one year. Singapore became one of the entry and dispersal points for large number of Chinese and Indian migrants who came to work in the plantations and mines of the Straits Settlements, many of whom then settled in Singapore after their contract ended. By 1860, the total population had reached around 90,000, of these 50,000 were Chinese, and 2,445 Europeans and Eurasians. The first thorough census in Singapore was undertaken in 1871, and the people were grouped into 33 racial, ethnic or national categories, with Chinese forming the largest group at 57.6%. Censuses were then conducted at 10 year intervals afterwards. The 1881 census grouped the people into 6 main categories, and further subdivided into 47 sub-categories. The 6 broad groups were given as Europeans, Eurasians, Malays, Chinese, Indians and Others in 1921. The Malays group includes other natives of the Malay archipelago, the Europeans include Americans, the Indians would be people from the Indian subcontinent including what would now be Pakistan and Bangladesh. In 1901, the total population of Singapore was 228,555, with 15.8% Malays, 71.8% Chinese, 7.8% Indians, and 3.5% Europeans and Eurasians. The Chinese population figure of Singapore has stayed at over 70% of the total since, reaching 77.8% in 1947. After dropping from a peak of 60% in the early years of Singapore, the Malay population would range between 11 and 16% in the first half of the 20th century, while Indians hovered between 7 and just over 9% in the same period."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many of the total population in 1860 were not Chinese?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "40000"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Many of the migrants from China in the 19th century came to work on the pepper and Uncaria gambir plantations, with 11,000 Chinese immigrants recorded in one year. Singapore became one of the entry and dispersal points for large number of Chinese and Indian migrants who came to work in the plantations and mines of the Straits Settlements, many of whom then settled in Singapore after their contract ended. By 1860, the total population had reached around 90,000, of these 50,000 were Chinese, and 2,445 Europeans and Eurasians. The first thorough census in Singapore was undertaken in 1871, and the people were grouped into 33 racial, ethnic or national categories, with Chinese forming the largest group at 57.6%. Censuses were then conducted at 10 year intervals afterwards. The 1881 census grouped the people into 6 main categories, and further subdivided into 47 sub-categories. The 6 broad groups were given as Europeans, Eurasians, Malays, Chinese, Indians and Others in 1921. The Malays group includes other natives of the Malay archipelago, the Europeans include Americans, the Indians would be people from the Indian subcontinent including what would now be Pakistan and Bangladesh. In 1901, the total population of Singapore was 228,555, with 15.8% Malays, 71.8% Chinese, 7.8% Indians, and 3.5% Europeans and Eurasians. The Chinese population figure of Singapore has stayed at over 70% of the total since, reaching 77.8% in 1947. After dropping from a peak of 60% in the early years of Singapore, the Malay population would range between 11 and 16% in the first half of the 20th century, while Indians hovered between 7 and just over 9% in the same period."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many more people in the population were Chinese than Europeans and Eurasians in 1860?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "47555"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Many of the migrants from China in the 19th century came to work on the pepper and Uncaria gambir plantations, with 11,000 Chinese immigrants recorded in one year. Singapore became one of the entry and dispersal points for large number of Chinese and Indian migrants who came to work in the plantations and mines of the Straits Settlements, many of whom then settled in Singapore after their contract ended. By 1860, the total population had reached around 90,000, of these 50,000 were Chinese, and 2,445 Europeans and Eurasians. The first thorough census in Singapore was undertaken in 1871, and the people were grouped into 33 racial, ethnic or national categories, with Chinese forming the largest group at 57.6%. Censuses were then conducted at 10 year intervals afterwards. The 1881 census grouped the people into 6 main categories, and further subdivided into 47 sub-categories. The 6 broad groups were given as Europeans, Eurasians, Malays, Chinese, Indians and Others in 1921. The Malays group includes other natives of the Malay archipelago, the Europeans include Americans, the Indians would be people from the Indian subcontinent including what would now be Pakistan and Bangladesh. In 1901, the total population of Singapore was 228,555, with 15.8% Malays, 71.8% Chinese, 7.8% Indians, and 3.5% Europeans and Eurasians. The Chinese population figure of Singapore has stayed at over 70% of the total since, reaching 77.8% in 1947. After dropping from a peak of 60% in the early years of Singapore, the Malay population would range between 11 and 16% in the first half of the 20th century, while Indians hovered between 7 and just over 9% in the same period."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many percent of the people were not Chinese in 1871?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "42.4"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Many of the migrants from China in the 19th century came to work on the pepper and Uncaria gambir plantations, with 11,000 Chinese immigrants recorded in one year. Singapore became one of the entry and dispersal points for large number of Chinese and Indian migrants who came to work in the plantations and mines of the Straits Settlements, many of whom then settled in Singapore after their contract ended. By 1860, the total population had reached around 90,000, of these 50,000 were Chinese, and 2,445 Europeans and Eurasians. The first thorough census in Singapore was undertaken in 1871, and the people were grouped into 33 racial, ethnic or national categories, with Chinese forming the largest group at 57.6%. Censuses were then conducted at 10 year intervals afterwards. The 1881 census grouped the people into 6 main categories, and further subdivided into 47 sub-categories. The 6 broad groups were given as Europeans, Eurasians, Malays, Chinese, Indians and Others in 1921. The Malays group includes other natives of the Malay archipelago, the Europeans include Americans, the Indians would be people from the Indian subcontinent including what would now be Pakistan and Bangladesh. In 1901, the total population of Singapore was 228,555, with 15.8% Malays, 71.8% Chinese, 7.8% Indians, and 3.5% Europeans and Eurasians. The Chinese population figure of Singapore has stayed at over 70% of the total since, reaching 77.8% in 1947. After dropping from a peak of 60% in the early years of Singapore, the Malay population would range between 11 and 16% in the first half of the 20th century, while Indians hovered between 7 and just over 9% in the same period."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many times has Singapore conducted a thorough census since 1871?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "14"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Many of the migrants from China in the 19th century came to work on the pepper and Uncaria gambir plantations, with 11,000 Chinese immigrants recorded in one year. Singapore became one of the entry and dispersal points for large number of Chinese and Indian migrants who came to work in the plantations and mines of the Straits Settlements, many of whom then settled in Singapore after their contract ended. By 1860, the total population had reached around 90,000, of these 50,000 were Chinese, and 2,445 Europeans and Eurasians. The first thorough census in Singapore was undertaken in 1871, and the people were grouped into 33 racial, ethnic or national categories, with Chinese forming the largest group at 57.6%. Censuses were then conducted at 10 year intervals afterwards. The 1881 census grouped the people into 6 main categories, and further subdivided into 47 sub-categories. The 6 broad groups were given as Europeans, Eurasians, Malays, Chinese, Indians and Others in 1921. The Malays group includes other natives of the Malay archipelago, the Europeans include Americans, the Indians would be people from the Indian subcontinent including what would now be Pakistan and Bangladesh. In 1901, the total population of Singapore was 228,555, with 15.8% Malays, 71.8% Chinese, 7.8% Indians, and 3.5% Europeans and Eurasians. The Chinese population figure of Singapore has stayed at over 70% of the total since, reaching 77.8% in 1947. After dropping from a peak of 60% in the early years of Singapore, the Malay population would range between 11 and 16% in the first half of the 20th century, while Indians hovered between 7 and just over 9% in the same period."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many percent of the population were not Chinese in 1901?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "28.2"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Many of the migrants from China in the 19th century came to work on the pepper and Uncaria gambir plantations, with 11,000 Chinese immigrants recorded in one year. Singapore became one of the entry and dispersal points for large number of Chinese and Indian migrants who came to work in the plantations and mines of the Straits Settlements, many of whom then settled in Singapore after their contract ended. By 1860, the total population had reached around 90,000, of these 50,000 were Chinese, and 2,445 Europeans and Eurasians. The first thorough census in Singapore was undertaken in 1871, and the people were grouped into 33 racial, ethnic or national categories, with Chinese forming the largest group at 57.6%. Censuses were then conducted at 10 year intervals afterwards. The 1881 census grouped the people into 6 main categories, and further subdivided into 47 sub-categories. The 6 broad groups were given as Europeans, Eurasians, Malays, Chinese, Indians and Others in 1921. The Malays group includes other natives of the Malay archipelago, the Europeans include Americans, the Indians would be people from the Indian subcontinent including what would now be Pakistan and Bangladesh. In 1901, the total population of Singapore was 228,555, with 15.8% Malays, 71.8% Chinese, 7.8% Indians, and 3.5% Europeans and Eurasians. The Chinese population figure of Singapore has stayed at over 70% of the total since, reaching 77.8% in 1947. After dropping from a peak of 60% in the early years of Singapore, the Malay population would range between 11 and 16% in the first half of the 20th century, while Indians hovered between 7 and just over 9% in the same period."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which were there more of living in Singapore in 1901, Malays or Chinese?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Chinese"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Many of the migrants from China in the 19th century came to work on the pepper and Uncaria gambir plantations, with 11,000 Chinese immigrants recorded in one year. Singapore became one of the entry and dispersal points for large number of Chinese and Indian migrants who came to work in the plantations and mines of the Straits Settlements, many of whom then settled in Singapore after their contract ended. By 1860, the total population had reached around 90,000, of these 50,000 were Chinese, and 2,445 Europeans and Eurasians. The first thorough census in Singapore was undertaken in 1871, and the people were grouped into 33 racial, ethnic or national categories, with Chinese forming the largest group at 57.6%. Censuses were then conducted at 10 year intervals afterwards. The 1881 census grouped the people into 6 main categories, and further subdivided into 47 sub-categories. The 6 broad groups were given as Europeans, Eurasians, Malays, Chinese, Indians and Others in 1921. The Malays group includes other natives of the Malay archipelago, the Europeans include Americans, the Indians would be people from the Indian subcontinent including what would now be Pakistan and Bangladesh. In 1901, the total population of Singapore was 228,555, with 15.8% Malays, 71.8% Chinese, 7.8% Indians, and 3.5% Europeans and Eurasians. The Chinese population figure of Singapore has stayed at over 70% of the total since, reaching 77.8% in 1947. After dropping from a peak of 60% in the early years of Singapore, the Malay population would range between 11 and 16% in the first half of the 20th century, while Indians hovered between 7 and just over 9% in the same period."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many more Malays lived in Singapore in 1901 compared to Indians?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "8"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Coming off their road win over the Seahawks, the Cardinals flew to Giants Stadium for a Week 7 Sunday night duel with the New York Giants. After a scoreless first quarter, Arizona would trail in the second quarter as Giants running back Brandon Jacobs got a 4-yard touchdown run. The Cardinals would answer with rookie running back Chris \"Beanie\" Wells, but New York came right back with quarterback Eli Manning completing a 62-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Hakeem Nicks. Arizona would end the half with kicker Neil Rackers nailing a 30-yard field goal. The Cardinals would take the lead in the third quarter with running back Tim Hightower's 1-yard touchdown run, followed by quarterback Kurt Warner completing a 6-yard touchdown pass to running back Jason Wright. The Giants tried to come back in the fourth quarter as kicker Lawrence Tynes booted a 20-yard field goal, yet safety Antrel Rolle's final interception of the game sealed the deal for Arizona."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Who caught an interception at the end of the game?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Antrel Rolle"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Coming off their road win over the Seahawks, the Cardinals flew to Giants Stadium for a Week 7 Sunday night duel with the New York Giants. After a scoreless first quarter, Arizona would trail in the second quarter as Giants running back Brandon Jacobs got a 4-yard touchdown run. The Cardinals would answer with rookie running back Chris \"Beanie\" Wells, but New York came right back with quarterback Eli Manning completing a 62-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Hakeem Nicks. Arizona would end the half with kicker Neil Rackers nailing a 30-yard field goal. The Cardinals would take the lead in the third quarter with running back Tim Hightower's 1-yard touchdown run, followed by quarterback Kurt Warner completing a 6-yard touchdown pass to running back Jason Wright. The Giants tried to come back in the fourth quarter as kicker Lawrence Tynes booted a 20-yard field goal, yet safety Antrel Rolle's final interception of the game sealed the deal for Arizona."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Who threw the longest touchdown of the game?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Eli Manning"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Coming off their road win over the Seahawks, the Cardinals flew to Giants Stadium for a Week 7 Sunday night duel with the New York Giants. After a scoreless first quarter, Arizona would trail in the second quarter as Giants running back Brandon Jacobs got a 4-yard touchdown run. The Cardinals would answer with rookie running back Chris \"Beanie\" Wells, but New York came right back with quarterback Eli Manning completing a 62-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Hakeem Nicks. Arizona would end the half with kicker Neil Rackers nailing a 30-yard field goal. The Cardinals would take the lead in the third quarter with running back Tim Hightower's 1-yard touchdown run, followed by quarterback Kurt Warner completing a 6-yard touchdown pass to running back Jason Wright. The Giants tried to come back in the fourth quarter as kicker Lawrence Tynes booted a 20-yard field goal, yet safety Antrel Rolle's final interception of the game sealed the deal for Arizona."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many field goals were kicked?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "2"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Coming off their road win over the Seahawks, the Cardinals flew to Giants Stadium for a Week 7 Sunday night duel with the New York Giants. After a scoreless first quarter, Arizona would trail in the second quarter as Giants running back Brandon Jacobs got a 4-yard touchdown run. The Cardinals would answer with rookie running back Chris \"Beanie\" Wells, but New York came right back with quarterback Eli Manning completing a 62-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Hakeem Nicks. Arizona would end the half with kicker Neil Rackers nailing a 30-yard field goal. The Cardinals would take the lead in the third quarter with running back Tim Hightower's 1-yard touchdown run, followed by quarterback Kurt Warner completing a 6-yard touchdown pass to running back Jason Wright. The Giants tried to come back in the fourth quarter as kicker Lawrence Tynes booted a 20-yard field goal, yet safety Antrel Rolle's final interception of the game sealed the deal for Arizona."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many touchdowns were scored?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "4"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Coming off their road win over the Seahawks, the Cardinals flew to Giants Stadium for a Week 7 Sunday night duel with the New York Giants. After a scoreless first quarter, Arizona would trail in the second quarter as Giants running back Brandon Jacobs got a 4-yard touchdown run. The Cardinals would answer with rookie running back Chris \"Beanie\" Wells, but New York came right back with quarterback Eli Manning completing a 62-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Hakeem Nicks. Arizona would end the half with kicker Neil Rackers nailing a 30-yard field goal. The Cardinals would take the lead in the third quarter with running back Tim Hightower's 1-yard touchdown run, followed by quarterback Kurt Warner completing a 6-yard touchdown pass to running back Jason Wright. The Giants tried to come back in the fourth quarter as kicker Lawrence Tynes booted a 20-yard field goal, yet safety Antrel Rolle's final interception of the game sealed the deal for Arizona."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many yards was the shortest touchdown pass?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "6"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Coming off their road win over the Seahawks, the Cardinals flew to Giants Stadium for a Week 7 Sunday night duel with the New York Giants. After a scoreless first quarter, Arizona would trail in the second quarter as Giants running back Brandon Jacobs got a 4-yard touchdown run. The Cardinals would answer with rookie running back Chris \"Beanie\" Wells, but New York came right back with quarterback Eli Manning completing a 62-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Hakeem Nicks. Arizona would end the half with kicker Neil Rackers nailing a 30-yard field goal. The Cardinals would take the lead in the third quarter with running back Tim Hightower's 1-yard touchdown run, followed by quarterback Kurt Warner completing a 6-yard touchdown pass to running back Jason Wright. The Giants tried to come back in the fourth quarter as kicker Lawrence Tynes booted a 20-yard field goal, yet safety Antrel Rolle's final interception of the game sealed the deal for Arizona."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many yards was the shortest touchdown run?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "1"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Coming off their road win over the Seahawks, the Cardinals flew to Giants Stadium for a Week 7 Sunday night duel with the New York Giants. After a scoreless first quarter, Arizona would trail in the second quarter as Giants running back Brandon Jacobs got a 4-yard touchdown run. The Cardinals would answer with rookie running back Chris \"Beanie\" Wells, but New York came right back with quarterback Eli Manning completing a 62-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Hakeem Nicks. Arizona would end the half with kicker Neil Rackers nailing a 30-yard field goal. The Cardinals would take the lead in the third quarter with running back Tim Hightower's 1-yard touchdown run, followed by quarterback Kurt Warner completing a 6-yard touchdown pass to running back Jason Wright. The Giants tried to come back in the fourth quarter as kicker Lawrence Tynes booted a 20-yard field goal, yet safety Antrel Rolle's final interception of the game sealed the deal for Arizona."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which team kicked the longest field goal?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Arizona"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Coming off their home win over the Dolphins, the Ravens flew to the Georgia Dome for a Week 10 interconference duel with the throwback-cladded Atlanta Falcons on Thursday night. After a scoreless first quarter, Baltimore trailed in the second quarter as Falcons quarterback Matt Ryan completed a 28-yard touchdown pass to running back Jason Snelling, followed by kicker Matt Bryant making a 28-yard field goal. Atlanta added onto their lead in the third quarter with Bryant's 51-yard field goal, yet the Ravens answered with quarterback Joe Flacco found wide receiver Anquan Boldin on a 5-yard touchdown pass. The Falcons struck back in the fourth quarter as Ryan completed a 4-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Roddy White. Baltimore took the lead as Flacco hooked up with wide receiver Derrick Mason on a 6-yard touchdown pass, followed by finding tight end Todd Heap on a 9-yard touchdown pass. However, Atlanta got the last laugh as Ryan completed a 33-yard touchdown pass to White (with a failed two-point conversion)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many passes did Heap receive?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "1"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Coming off their home win over the Dolphins, the Ravens flew to the Georgia Dome for a Week 10 interconference duel with the throwback-cladded Atlanta Falcons on Thursday night. After a scoreless first quarter, Baltimore trailed in the second quarter as Falcons quarterback Matt Ryan completed a 28-yard touchdown pass to running back Jason Snelling, followed by kicker Matt Bryant making a 28-yard field goal. Atlanta added onto their lead in the third quarter with Bryant's 51-yard field goal, yet the Ravens answered with quarterback Joe Flacco found wide receiver Anquan Boldin on a 5-yard touchdown pass. The Falcons struck back in the fourth quarter as Ryan completed a 4-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Roddy White. Baltimore took the lead as Flacco hooked up with wide receiver Derrick Mason on a 6-yard touchdown pass, followed by finding tight end Todd Heap on a 9-yard touchdown pass. However, Atlanta got the last laugh as Ryan completed a 33-yard touchdown pass to White (with a failed two-point conversion)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many passes did Anquan Boldin receive?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "1"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Coming off their home win over the Dolphins, the Ravens flew to the Georgia Dome for a Week 10 interconference duel with the throwback-cladded Atlanta Falcons on Thursday night. After a scoreless first quarter, Baltimore trailed in the second quarter as Falcons quarterback Matt Ryan completed a 28-yard touchdown pass to running back Jason Snelling, followed by kicker Matt Bryant making a 28-yard field goal. Atlanta added onto their lead in the third quarter with Bryant's 51-yard field goal, yet the Ravens answered with quarterback Joe Flacco found wide receiver Anquan Boldin on a 5-yard touchdown pass. The Falcons struck back in the fourth quarter as Ryan completed a 4-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Roddy White. Baltimore took the lead as Flacco hooked up with wide receiver Derrick Mason on a 6-yard touchdown pass, followed by finding tight end Todd Heap on a 9-yard touchdown pass. However, Atlanta got the last laugh as Ryan completed a 33-yard touchdown pass to White (with a failed two-point conversion)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many passes did Mason receive?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "1"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Coming off their home win over the Dolphins, the Ravens flew to the Georgia Dome for a Week 10 interconference duel with the throwback-cladded Atlanta Falcons on Thursday night. After a scoreless first quarter, Baltimore trailed in the second quarter as Falcons quarterback Matt Ryan completed a 28-yard touchdown pass to running back Jason Snelling, followed by kicker Matt Bryant making a 28-yard field goal. Atlanta added onto their lead in the third quarter with Bryant's 51-yard field goal, yet the Ravens answered with quarterback Joe Flacco found wide receiver Anquan Boldin on a 5-yard touchdown pass. The Falcons struck back in the fourth quarter as Ryan completed a 4-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Roddy White. Baltimore took the lead as Flacco hooked up with wide receiver Derrick Mason on a 6-yard touchdown pass, followed by finding tight end Todd Heap on a 9-yard touchdown pass. However, Atlanta got the last laugh as Ryan completed a 33-yard touchdown pass to White (with a failed two-point conversion)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many passes did white receive?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "2"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "After winning at home, the Steelers traveled to Detroit to take on the Lions. The Steelers would score first when Chris Boswell nailed a 34-yard field goal to make the score 3-0. The Lions tied the game up later on when Matt Prater kicked a 48-yard field goal to make it 3-3. The Lions moved into the lead when Prater kicked a 37-yard field goal to make it 6-3. The Steelers moved back into the lead when Le'Veon Bell ran for a 5-yard touchdown to make it 10-6. The Lions retook the lead when Prater kicked 2 more field goals from 51 and 34 yards out to make the score 10-9 and then move up 12-10 at halftime. In the third quarter, it was all Steelers as they retook the lead when Chris Boswell kicked a 38-yard field goal to make it 13-12. Later on in the quarter, Ben Roethlisberger connected with JuJu Smith-Schuster for a 97-yard pass making it 20-12. The Lions scored their only points of the second half in the fourth quarter when Prater kicked a 19-yard field goal to make it 20-15. This would eventually be the final score of the game. With the win, the Steelers went into their bye week 6-2. After falling behind in the all-time series to the Lions 4-12-1 through 1965, the Steelers' victory moved them to 13-2 against Detroit since 1966. The team also held an opponent without a touchdown on the road for the first time since their 28-12 victory over the Browns in 2015."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "What type of score won the game?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "field goal"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "After winning at home, the Steelers traveled to Detroit to take on the Lions. The Steelers would score first when Chris Boswell nailed a 34-yard field goal to make the score 3-0. The Lions tied the game up later on when Matt Prater kicked a 48-yard field goal to make it 3-3. The Lions moved into the lead when Prater kicked a 37-yard field goal to make it 6-3. The Steelers moved back into the lead when Le'Veon Bell ran for a 5-yard touchdown to make it 10-6. The Lions retook the lead when Prater kicked 2 more field goals from 51 and 34 yards out to make the score 10-9 and then move up 12-10 at halftime. In the third quarter, it was all Steelers as they retook the lead when Chris Boswell kicked a 38-yard field goal to make it 13-12. Later on in the quarter, Ben Roethlisberger connected with JuJu Smith-Schuster for a 97-yard pass making it 20-12. The Lions scored their only points of the second half in the fourth quarter when Prater kicked a 19-yard field goal to make it 20-15. This would eventually be the final score of the game. With the win, the Steelers went into their bye week 6-2. After falling behind in the all-time series to the Lions 4-12-1 through 1965, the Steelers' victory moved them to 13-2 against Detroit since 1966. The team also held an opponent without a touchdown on the road for the first time since their 28-12 victory over the Browns in 2015."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "What team did the Browns lose against in 2015?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Steelers"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "After winning at home, the Steelers traveled to Detroit to take on the Lions. The Steelers would score first when Chris Boswell nailed a 34-yard field goal to make the score 3-0. The Lions tied the game up later on when Matt Prater kicked a 48-yard field goal to make it 3-3. The Lions moved into the lead when Prater kicked a 37-yard field goal to make it 6-3. The Steelers moved back into the lead when Le'Veon Bell ran for a 5-yard touchdown to make it 10-6. The Lions retook the lead when Prater kicked 2 more field goals from 51 and 34 yards out to make the score 10-9 and then move up 12-10 at halftime. In the third quarter, it was all Steelers as they retook the lead when Chris Boswell kicked a 38-yard field goal to make it 13-12. Later on in the quarter, Ben Roethlisberger connected with JuJu Smith-Schuster for a 97-yard pass making it 20-12. The Lions scored their only points of the second half in the fourth quarter when Prater kicked a 19-yard field goal to make it 20-15. This would eventually be the final score of the game. With the win, the Steelers went into their bye week 6-2. After falling behind in the all-time series to the Lions 4-12-1 through 1965, the Steelers' victory moved them to 13-2 against Detroit since 1966. The team also held an opponent without a touchdown on the road for the first time since their 28-12 victory over the Browns in 2015."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many points was the former amount after the 34 yard field goal was made?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "3"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "After winning at home, the Steelers traveled to Detroit to take on the Lions. The Steelers would score first when Chris Boswell nailed a 34-yard field goal to make the score 3-0. The Lions tied the game up later on when Matt Prater kicked a 48-yard field goal to make it 3-3. The Lions moved into the lead when Prater kicked a 37-yard field goal to make it 6-3. The Steelers moved back into the lead when Le'Veon Bell ran for a 5-yard touchdown to make it 10-6. The Lions retook the lead when Prater kicked 2 more field goals from 51 and 34 yards out to make the score 10-9 and then move up 12-10 at halftime. In the third quarter, it was all Steelers as they retook the lead when Chris Boswell kicked a 38-yard field goal to make it 13-12. Later on in the quarter, Ben Roethlisberger connected with JuJu Smith-Schuster for a 97-yard pass making it 20-12. The Lions scored their only points of the second half in the fourth quarter when Prater kicked a 19-yard field goal to make it 20-15. This would eventually be the final score of the game. With the win, the Steelers went into their bye week 6-2. After falling behind in the all-time series to the Lions 4-12-1 through 1965, the Steelers' victory moved them to 13-2 against Detroit since 1966. The team also held an opponent without a touchdown on the road for the first time since their 28-12 victory over the Browns in 2015."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many points was the latter amount after the 34 yard field goal was made?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "0"
}
] |
Subsets and Splits