messages
listlengths 4
4
|
|---|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The war changed the ethnic and religious profile of the city. It had long been a multicultural city, and often went by the nickname of \"Europes Jerusalem\". At the time of the 1991 census, 49.2 per cent of the citys population of 527,049 were Bosniaks, 29.8 percent Bosnian Serbs, 10.7 percent Yugoslavs, 6.6 percent Bosnian Croats and 3.6 percent other ethnicities (Jews, Romas, etc.). By 2002, 79.6 per cent of the cantons population of 401,118 were Bosniak, 11.2 percent Serb, 6.7 percent Croat and 2.5 percent others (Jews, Romas, Arabs, etc.)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which group from cantons population in 2002 is larger: Bosniak or Serb?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Bosniak"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The war changed the ethnic and religious profile of the city. It had long been a multicultural city, and often went by the nickname of \"Europes Jerusalem\". At the time of the 1991 census, 49.2 per cent of the citys population of 527,049 were Bosniaks, 29.8 percent Bosnian Serbs, 10.7 percent Yugoslavs, 6.6 percent Bosnian Croats and 3.6 percent other ethnicities (Jews, Romas, etc.). By 2002, 79.6 per cent of the cantons population of 401,118 were Bosniak, 11.2 percent Serb, 6.7 percent Croat and 2.5 percent others (Jews, Romas, Arabs, etc.)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which group from cantons population in 2002 is smaller: Bosniak or Serb?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Serb"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The war changed the ethnic and religious profile of the city. It had long been a multicultural city, and often went by the nickname of \"Europes Jerusalem\". At the time of the 1991 census, 49.2 per cent of the citys population of 527,049 were Bosniaks, 29.8 percent Bosnian Serbs, 10.7 percent Yugoslavs, 6.6 percent Bosnian Croats and 3.6 percent other ethnicities (Jews, Romas, etc.). By 2002, 79.6 per cent of the cantons population of 401,118 were Bosniak, 11.2 percent Serb, 6.7 percent Croat and 2.5 percent others (Jews, Romas, Arabs, etc.)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which group from cantons population in 2002 is larger: Bosniak or Croat?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Bosniak"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The war changed the ethnic and religious profile of the city. It had long been a multicultural city, and often went by the nickname of \"Europes Jerusalem\". At the time of the 1991 census, 49.2 per cent of the citys population of 527,049 were Bosniaks, 29.8 percent Bosnian Serbs, 10.7 percent Yugoslavs, 6.6 percent Bosnian Croats and 3.6 percent other ethnicities (Jews, Romas, etc.). By 2002, 79.6 per cent of the cantons population of 401,118 were Bosniak, 11.2 percent Serb, 6.7 percent Croat and 2.5 percent others (Jews, Romas, Arabs, etc.)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which group from cantons population in 2002 is smaller: Bosniak or Croat?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Croat"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The war changed the ethnic and religious profile of the city. It had long been a multicultural city, and often went by the nickname of \"Europes Jerusalem\". At the time of the 1991 census, 49.2 per cent of the citys population of 527,049 were Bosniaks, 29.8 percent Bosnian Serbs, 10.7 percent Yugoslavs, 6.6 percent Bosnian Croats and 3.6 percent other ethnicities (Jews, Romas, etc.). By 2002, 79.6 per cent of the cantons population of 401,118 were Bosniak, 11.2 percent Serb, 6.7 percent Croat and 2.5 percent others (Jews, Romas, Arabs, etc.)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which group from cantons population in 2002 is larger: Serb or Croat?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Serb"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The war changed the ethnic and religious profile of the city. It had long been a multicultural city, and often went by the nickname of \"Europes Jerusalem\". At the time of the 1991 census, 49.2 per cent of the citys population of 527,049 were Bosniaks, 29.8 percent Bosnian Serbs, 10.7 percent Yugoslavs, 6.6 percent Bosnian Croats and 3.6 percent other ethnicities (Jews, Romas, etc.). By 2002, 79.6 per cent of the cantons population of 401,118 were Bosniak, 11.2 percent Serb, 6.7 percent Croat and 2.5 percent others (Jews, Romas, Arabs, etc.)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which group from cantons population in 2002 is smaller: Serb or Croat?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Croat"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The war changed the ethnic and religious profile of the city. It had long been a multicultural city, and often went by the nickname of \"Europes Jerusalem\". At the time of the 1991 census, 49.2 per cent of the citys population of 527,049 were Bosniaks, 29.8 percent Bosnian Serbs, 10.7 percent Yugoslavs, 6.6 percent Bosnian Croats and 3.6 percent other ethnicities (Jews, Romas, etc.). By 2002, 79.6 per cent of the cantons population of 401,118 were Bosniak, 11.2 percent Serb, 6.7 percent Croat and 2.5 percent others (Jews, Romas, Arabs, etc.)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many percent more of the population was made up of Bosniaks in 2002 over 1991?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "30.4"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The war changed the ethnic and religious profile of the city. It had long been a multicultural city, and often went by the nickname of \"Europes Jerusalem\". At the time of the 1991 census, 49.2 per cent of the citys population of 527,049 were Bosniaks, 29.8 percent Bosnian Serbs, 10.7 percent Yugoslavs, 6.6 percent Bosnian Croats and 3.6 percent other ethnicities (Jews, Romas, etc.). By 2002, 79.6 per cent of the cantons population of 401,118 were Bosniak, 11.2 percent Serb, 6.7 percent Croat and 2.5 percent others (Jews, Romas, Arabs, etc.)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "What group made up the smallest percent of the population in 1991?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "other ethnicities"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The war changed the ethnic and religious profile of the city. It had long been a multicultural city, and often went by the nickname of \"Europes Jerusalem\". At the time of the 1991 census, 49.2 per cent of the citys population of 527,049 were Bosniaks, 29.8 percent Bosnian Serbs, 10.7 percent Yugoslavs, 6.6 percent Bosnian Croats and 3.6 percent other ethnicities (Jews, Romas, etc.). By 2002, 79.6 per cent of the cantons population of 401,118 were Bosniak, 11.2 percent Serb, 6.7 percent Croat and 2.5 percent others (Jews, Romas, Arabs, etc.)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many percent of people were not Bosniaks in 1991?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "50.8"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The war changed the ethnic and religious profile of the city. It had long been a multicultural city, and often went by the nickname of \"Europes Jerusalem\". At the time of the 1991 census, 49.2 per cent of the citys population of 527,049 were Bosniaks, 29.8 percent Bosnian Serbs, 10.7 percent Yugoslavs, 6.6 percent Bosnian Croats and 3.6 percent other ethnicities (Jews, Romas, etc.). By 2002, 79.6 per cent of the cantons population of 401,118 were Bosniak, 11.2 percent Serb, 6.7 percent Croat and 2.5 percent others (Jews, Romas, Arabs, etc.)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many percent of people were not Bosnian Serbs in 1991?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "70.2"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The war changed the ethnic and religious profile of the city. It had long been a multicultural city, and often went by the nickname of \"Europes Jerusalem\". At the time of the 1991 census, 49.2 per cent of the citys population of 527,049 were Bosniaks, 29.8 percent Bosnian Serbs, 10.7 percent Yugoslavs, 6.6 percent Bosnian Croats and 3.6 percent other ethnicities (Jews, Romas, etc.). By 2002, 79.6 per cent of the cantons population of 401,118 were Bosniak, 11.2 percent Serb, 6.7 percent Croat and 2.5 percent others (Jews, Romas, Arabs, etc.)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many percent of people were not Yugoslavs in 1991?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "89.3"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The war changed the ethnic and religious profile of the city. It had long been a multicultural city, and often went by the nickname of \"Europes Jerusalem\". At the time of the 1991 census, 49.2 per cent of the citys population of 527,049 were Bosniaks, 29.8 percent Bosnian Serbs, 10.7 percent Yugoslavs, 6.6 percent Bosnian Croats and 3.6 percent other ethnicities (Jews, Romas, etc.). By 2002, 79.6 per cent of the cantons population of 401,118 were Bosniak, 11.2 percent Serb, 6.7 percent Croat and 2.5 percent others (Jews, Romas, Arabs, etc.)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many percent of people were not Bosnian Croats in 1991?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "93.4"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The war changed the ethnic and religious profile of the city. It had long been a multicultural city, and often went by the nickname of \"Europes Jerusalem\". At the time of the 1991 census, 49.2 per cent of the citys population of 527,049 were Bosniaks, 29.8 percent Bosnian Serbs, 10.7 percent Yugoslavs, 6.6 percent Bosnian Croats and 3.6 percent other ethnicities (Jews, Romas, etc.). By 2002, 79.6 per cent of the cantons population of 401,118 were Bosniak, 11.2 percent Serb, 6.7 percent Croat and 2.5 percent others (Jews, Romas, Arabs, etc.)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many percent of people were not other ethnicities in 1991?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "96.4"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The war changed the ethnic and religious profile of the city. It had long been a multicultural city, and often went by the nickname of \"Europes Jerusalem\". At the time of the 1991 census, 49.2 per cent of the citys population of 527,049 were Bosniaks, 29.8 percent Bosnian Serbs, 10.7 percent Yugoslavs, 6.6 percent Bosnian Croats and 3.6 percent other ethnicities (Jews, Romas, etc.). By 2002, 79.6 per cent of the cantons population of 401,118 were Bosniak, 11.2 percent Serb, 6.7 percent Croat and 2.5 percent others (Jews, Romas, Arabs, etc.)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many percent of people were not Bosniaks in 2002?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "20.4"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The war changed the ethnic and religious profile of the city. It had long been a multicultural city, and often went by the nickname of \"Europes Jerusalem\". At the time of the 1991 census, 49.2 per cent of the citys population of 527,049 were Bosniaks, 29.8 percent Bosnian Serbs, 10.7 percent Yugoslavs, 6.6 percent Bosnian Croats and 3.6 percent other ethnicities (Jews, Romas, etc.). By 2002, 79.6 per cent of the cantons population of 401,118 were Bosniak, 11.2 percent Serb, 6.7 percent Croat and 2.5 percent others (Jews, Romas, Arabs, etc.)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many percent of people were not Serb in 2002?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "88.8"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The war changed the ethnic and religious profile of the city. It had long been a multicultural city, and often went by the nickname of \"Europes Jerusalem\". At the time of the 1991 census, 49.2 per cent of the citys population of 527,049 were Bosniaks, 29.8 percent Bosnian Serbs, 10.7 percent Yugoslavs, 6.6 percent Bosnian Croats and 3.6 percent other ethnicities (Jews, Romas, etc.). By 2002, 79.6 per cent of the cantons population of 401,118 were Bosniak, 11.2 percent Serb, 6.7 percent Croat and 2.5 percent others (Jews, Romas, Arabs, etc.)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many percent of people were not Croat in 2002?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "93.3"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The war changed the ethnic and religious profile of the city. It had long been a multicultural city, and often went by the nickname of \"Europes Jerusalem\". At the time of the 1991 census, 49.2 per cent of the citys population of 527,049 were Bosniaks, 29.8 percent Bosnian Serbs, 10.7 percent Yugoslavs, 6.6 percent Bosnian Croats and 3.6 percent other ethnicities (Jews, Romas, etc.). By 2002, 79.6 per cent of the cantons population of 401,118 were Bosniak, 11.2 percent Serb, 6.7 percent Croat and 2.5 percent others (Jews, Romas, Arabs, etc.)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many percent of people were not other ethnicities in 2002?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "97.5"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The war changed the ethnic and religious profile of the city. It had long been a multicultural city, and often went by the nickname of \"Europes Jerusalem\". At the time of the 1991 census, 49.2 per cent of the citys population of 527,049 were Bosniaks, 29.8 percent Bosnian Serbs, 10.7 percent Yugoslavs, 6.6 percent Bosnian Croats and 3.6 percent other ethnicities (Jews, Romas, etc.). By 2002, 79.6 per cent of the cantons population of 401,118 were Bosniak, 11.2 percent Serb, 6.7 percent Croat and 2.5 percent others (Jews, Romas, Arabs, etc.)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "In 1991, how many more people, in terms of percentage, were Bosniaks compared to Bosnian Serbs and Yugoslavs combined?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "8.7"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The war changed the ethnic and religious profile of the city. It had long been a multicultural city, and often went by the nickname of \"Europes Jerusalem\". At the time of the 1991 census, 49.2 per cent of the citys population of 527,049 were Bosniaks, 29.8 percent Bosnian Serbs, 10.7 percent Yugoslavs, 6.6 percent Bosnian Croats and 3.6 percent other ethnicities (Jews, Romas, etc.). By 2002, 79.6 per cent of the cantons population of 401,118 were Bosniak, 11.2 percent Serb, 6.7 percent Croat and 2.5 percent others (Jews, Romas, Arabs, etc.)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "In 1991, how many more people, in terms of percentage, were Bosniaks compared to Bosnian Serbs and Bosnian Croats combined?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "12.8"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The war changed the ethnic and religious profile of the city. It had long been a multicultural city, and often went by the nickname of \"Europes Jerusalem\". At the time of the 1991 census, 49.2 per cent of the citys population of 527,049 were Bosniaks, 29.8 percent Bosnian Serbs, 10.7 percent Yugoslavs, 6.6 percent Bosnian Croats and 3.6 percent other ethnicities (Jews, Romas, etc.). By 2002, 79.6 per cent of the cantons population of 401,118 were Bosniak, 11.2 percent Serb, 6.7 percent Croat and 2.5 percent others (Jews, Romas, Arabs, etc.)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "In 1991, how many more people, in terms of percentage, were Bosniaks compared to Bosnian Serbs and \"other ethnicities\" combined?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "15.8"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The war changed the ethnic and religious profile of the city. It had long been a multicultural city, and often went by the nickname of \"Europes Jerusalem\". At the time of the 1991 census, 49.2 per cent of the citys population of 527,049 were Bosniaks, 29.8 percent Bosnian Serbs, 10.7 percent Yugoslavs, 6.6 percent Bosnian Croats and 3.6 percent other ethnicities (Jews, Romas, etc.). By 2002, 79.6 per cent of the cantons population of 401,118 were Bosniak, 11.2 percent Serb, 6.7 percent Croat and 2.5 percent others (Jews, Romas, Arabs, etc.)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "In 1991, how many more people, in terms of percentage, were Bosniaks compared to Bosnian Croats and Yugoslavs combined?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "31.9"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The war changed the ethnic and religious profile of the city. It had long been a multicultural city, and often went by the nickname of \"Europes Jerusalem\". At the time of the 1991 census, 49.2 per cent of the citys population of 527,049 were Bosniaks, 29.8 percent Bosnian Serbs, 10.7 percent Yugoslavs, 6.6 percent Bosnian Croats and 3.6 percent other ethnicities (Jews, Romas, etc.). By 2002, 79.6 per cent of the cantons population of 401,118 were Bosniak, 11.2 percent Serb, 6.7 percent Croat and 2.5 percent others (Jews, Romas, Arabs, etc.)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "In 1991, how many more people, in terms of percentage, were Bosniaks compared to \"other ethnicities\" and Yugoslavs combined?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "34.9"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The war changed the ethnic and religious profile of the city. It had long been a multicultural city, and often went by the nickname of \"Europes Jerusalem\". At the time of the 1991 census, 49.2 per cent of the citys population of 527,049 were Bosniaks, 29.8 percent Bosnian Serbs, 10.7 percent Yugoslavs, 6.6 percent Bosnian Croats and 3.6 percent other ethnicities (Jews, Romas, etc.). By 2002, 79.6 per cent of the cantons population of 401,118 were Bosniak, 11.2 percent Serb, 6.7 percent Croat and 2.5 percent others (Jews, Romas, Arabs, etc.)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "In 1991, how many more people, in terms of percentage, were Bosniaks compared to Bosnian Croats and \"other ethnicities\" combined?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "39"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The war changed the ethnic and religious profile of the city. It had long been a multicultural city, and often went by the nickname of \"Europes Jerusalem\". At the time of the 1991 census, 49.2 per cent of the citys population of 527,049 were Bosniaks, 29.8 percent Bosnian Serbs, 10.7 percent Yugoslavs, 6.6 percent Bosnian Croats and 3.6 percent other ethnicities (Jews, Romas, etc.). By 2002, 79.6 per cent of the cantons population of 401,118 were Bosniak, 11.2 percent Serb, 6.7 percent Croat and 2.5 percent others (Jews, Romas, Arabs, etc.)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "In 1991, how many people, in terms of percentage, were either Bosniaks, Bosnian Serbs, or Yugoslavs?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "89.7"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The war changed the ethnic and religious profile of the city. It had long been a multicultural city, and often went by the nickname of \"Europes Jerusalem\". At the time of the 1991 census, 49.2 per cent of the citys population of 527,049 were Bosniaks, 29.8 percent Bosnian Serbs, 10.7 percent Yugoslavs, 6.6 percent Bosnian Croats and 3.6 percent other ethnicities (Jews, Romas, etc.). By 2002, 79.6 per cent of the cantons population of 401,118 were Bosniak, 11.2 percent Serb, 6.7 percent Croat and 2.5 percent others (Jews, Romas, Arabs, etc.)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which group increased less in their percentage of the population from 1991 to 2002, Bosniaks or Croats?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Croats"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": " Coming off their overtime win to the Falcons, the Giants flew for a Week 12 interconference game against the Denver Broncos, their first Thanksgiving game since 1992. In the first quarter the Giants trailed early with kicker Matt Prater making a 26-yard field goal and then a 32-yard field goal in the second quarter. The Broncos kept on top with RB Knowshon Moreno making a 1-yard touchdown run. After that Matt Prater made a 47-yard field goal to end the half. In the third quarter the Giants replied with kicker Lawrence Tynes nailing a 39 then a 52-yard field goal. In the fourth quarter New York fell further behind with QB Kyle Orton making a 17-yard touchdown pass to WR Brandon Stokley, and Prater making a 24-yard field goal."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many yards was the longest field goal?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "52-yard"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": " Coming off their overtime win to the Falcons, the Giants flew for a Week 12 interconference game against the Denver Broncos, their first Thanksgiving game since 1992. In the first quarter the Giants trailed early with kicker Matt Prater making a 26-yard field goal and then a 32-yard field goal in the second quarter. The Broncos kept on top with RB Knowshon Moreno making a 1-yard touchdown run. After that Matt Prater made a 47-yard field goal to end the half. In the third quarter the Giants replied with kicker Lawrence Tynes nailing a 39 then a 52-yard field goal. In the fourth quarter New York fell further behind with QB Kyle Orton making a 17-yard touchdown pass to WR Brandon Stokley, and Prater making a 24-yard field goal."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many yards was the shortest field goal?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "24-yard"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": " Coming off their overtime win to the Falcons, the Giants flew for a Week 12 interconference game against the Denver Broncos, their first Thanksgiving game since 1992. In the first quarter the Giants trailed early with kicker Matt Prater making a 26-yard field goal and then a 32-yard field goal in the second quarter. The Broncos kept on top with RB Knowshon Moreno making a 1-yard touchdown run. After that Matt Prater made a 47-yard field goal to end the half. In the third quarter the Giants replied with kicker Lawrence Tynes nailing a 39 then a 52-yard field goal. In the fourth quarter New York fell further behind with QB Kyle Orton making a 17-yard touchdown pass to WR Brandon Stokley, and Prater making a 24-yard field goal."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "What team scored the last touchdown of the game?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Broncos"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": " Coming off their overtime win to the Falcons, the Giants flew for a Week 12 interconference game against the Denver Broncos, their first Thanksgiving game since 1992. In the first quarter the Giants trailed early with kicker Matt Prater making a 26-yard field goal and then a 32-yard field goal in the second quarter. The Broncos kept on top with RB Knowshon Moreno making a 1-yard touchdown run. After that Matt Prater made a 47-yard field goal to end the half. In the third quarter the Giants replied with kicker Lawrence Tynes nailing a 39 then a 52-yard field goal. In the fourth quarter New York fell further behind with QB Kyle Orton making a 17-yard touchdown pass to WR Brandon Stokley, and Prater making a 24-yard field goal."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "What team scored the first touchdown of the game?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Broncos"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": " Coming off their overtime win to the Falcons, the Giants flew for a Week 12 interconference game against the Denver Broncos, their first Thanksgiving game since 1992. In the first quarter the Giants trailed early with kicker Matt Prater making a 26-yard field goal and then a 32-yard field goal in the second quarter. The Broncos kept on top with RB Knowshon Moreno making a 1-yard touchdown run. After that Matt Prater made a 47-yard field goal to end the half. In the third quarter the Giants replied with kicker Lawrence Tynes nailing a 39 then a 52-yard field goal. In the fourth quarter New York fell further behind with QB Kyle Orton making a 17-yard touchdown pass to WR Brandon Stokley, and Prater making a 24-yard field goal."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many field goals were made of more than 25 and less than 50 yards?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "4"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": " Coming off their overtime win to the Falcons, the Giants flew for a Week 12 interconference game against the Denver Broncos, their first Thanksgiving game since 1992. In the first quarter the Giants trailed early with kicker Matt Prater making a 26-yard field goal and then a 32-yard field goal in the second quarter. The Broncos kept on top with RB Knowshon Moreno making a 1-yard touchdown run. After that Matt Prater made a 47-yard field goal to end the half. In the third quarter the Giants replied with kicker Lawrence Tynes nailing a 39 then a 52-yard field goal. In the fourth quarter New York fell further behind with QB Kyle Orton making a 17-yard touchdown pass to WR Brandon Stokley, and Prater making a 24-yard field goal."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many total yards did Lawrence Tynes kick on field goals?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "91"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": " Coming off their overtime win to the Falcons, the Giants flew for a Week 12 interconference game against the Denver Broncos, their first Thanksgiving game since 1992. In the first quarter the Giants trailed early with kicker Matt Prater making a 26-yard field goal and then a 32-yard field goal in the second quarter. The Broncos kept on top with RB Knowshon Moreno making a 1-yard touchdown run. After that Matt Prater made a 47-yard field goal to end the half. In the third quarter the Giants replied with kicker Lawrence Tynes nailing a 39 then a 52-yard field goal. In the fourth quarter New York fell further behind with QB Kyle Orton making a 17-yard touchdown pass to WR Brandon Stokley, and Prater making a 24-yard field goal."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many field goals did Matt Prater kick in the first half?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "3"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": " Coming off their overtime win to the Falcons, the Giants flew for a Week 12 interconference game against the Denver Broncos, their first Thanksgiving game since 1992. In the first quarter the Giants trailed early with kicker Matt Prater making a 26-yard field goal and then a 32-yard field goal in the second quarter. The Broncos kept on top with RB Knowshon Moreno making a 1-yard touchdown run. After that Matt Prater made a 47-yard field goal to end the half. In the third quarter the Giants replied with kicker Lawrence Tynes nailing a 39 then a 52-yard field goal. In the fourth quarter New York fell further behind with QB Kyle Orton making a 17-yard touchdown pass to WR Brandon Stokley, and Prater making a 24-yard field goal."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "how many yards did prater make?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "26"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": " Coming off their overtime win to the Falcons, the Giants flew for a Week 12 interconference game against the Denver Broncos, their first Thanksgiving game since 1992. In the first quarter the Giants trailed early with kicker Matt Prater making a 26-yard field goal and then a 32-yard field goal in the second quarter. The Broncos kept on top with RB Knowshon Moreno making a 1-yard touchdown run. After that Matt Prater made a 47-yard field goal to end the half. In the third quarter the Giants replied with kicker Lawrence Tynes nailing a 39 then a 52-yard field goal. In the fourth quarter New York fell further behind with QB Kyle Orton making a 17-yard touchdown pass to WR Brandon Stokley, and Prater making a 24-yard field goal."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "how many yards did orton make?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "17"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": " The first quarter was all about defense, as the teams traded punts until the Jets got the ball late in the first quarter at their own 24-yard line. On the drive, Chad Pennington converted key third downs to Brad Smith and Tim Dwight, and was soon faced with a 3rd-and-goal at the Bears' 6-yard line. Apparently unable to see an open Laveranues Coles, Pennington lobbed a pass towards Chris Baker that was intercepted by Brian Urlacher. With just under four minutes left in the half, Thomas Jones appeared to fumble and Kerry Rhodes recovered, but Chicago successfully challenged the play, denying the Jets a scoring opportunity. The game was scoreless at halftime. Eric Mangini, apparently remembering the success of his surprise onside kick against Indianapolis in Week 4, decided to open the second half with one. Unfortunately, this one was scooped up by Chicago's Chris Harris. On the Bears' first play, Jones broke off a 19-yard run, and Jones rushed every play on the drive that was capped off by a 20-yard field goal by Robbie Gould. The Jets' next drive ended when Pennington was intercepted by Nathan Vasher in Chicago territory. The Bears' game-breaking score came when Rex Grossman completed a short pass to Mark Bradley. The Jets' Drew Coleman fell down attempting to make the tackle, and Bradley had an open lane to the end zone to extend the Bears' lead to 10-0. The Bears then went into a ball-control offense, and the Jets could not muster anything."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Who threw the most interceptions?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Pennington"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": " The first quarter was all about defense, as the teams traded punts until the Jets got the ball late in the first quarter at their own 24-yard line. On the drive, Chad Pennington converted key third downs to Brad Smith and Tim Dwight, and was soon faced with a 3rd-and-goal at the Bears' 6-yard line. Apparently unable to see an open Laveranues Coles, Pennington lobbed a pass towards Chris Baker that was intercepted by Brian Urlacher. With just under four minutes left in the half, Thomas Jones appeared to fumble and Kerry Rhodes recovered, but Chicago successfully challenged the play, denying the Jets a scoring opportunity. The game was scoreless at halftime. Eric Mangini, apparently remembering the success of his surprise onside kick against Indianapolis in Week 4, decided to open the second half with one. Unfortunately, this one was scooped up by Chicago's Chris Harris. On the Bears' first play, Jones broke off a 19-yard run, and Jones rushed every play on the drive that was capped off by a 20-yard field goal by Robbie Gould. The Jets' next drive ended when Pennington was intercepted by Nathan Vasher in Chicago territory. The Bears' game-breaking score came when Rex Grossman completed a short pass to Mark Bradley. The Jets' Drew Coleman fell down attempting to make the tackle, and Bradley had an open lane to the end zone to extend the Bears' lead to 10-0. The Bears then went into a ball-control offense, and the Jets could not muster anything."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Who score the games only touchdown?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Mark Bradley"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": " The first quarter was all about defense, as the teams traded punts until the Jets got the ball late in the first quarter at their own 24-yard line. On the drive, Chad Pennington converted key third downs to Brad Smith and Tim Dwight, and was soon faced with a 3rd-and-goal at the Bears' 6-yard line. Apparently unable to see an open Laveranues Coles, Pennington lobbed a pass towards Chris Baker that was intercepted by Brian Urlacher. With just under four minutes left in the half, Thomas Jones appeared to fumble and Kerry Rhodes recovered, but Chicago successfully challenged the play, denying the Jets a scoring opportunity. The game was scoreless at halftime. Eric Mangini, apparently remembering the success of his surprise onside kick against Indianapolis in Week 4, decided to open the second half with one. Unfortunately, this one was scooped up by Chicago's Chris Harris. On the Bears' first play, Jones broke off a 19-yard run, and Jones rushed every play on the drive that was capped off by a 20-yard field goal by Robbie Gould. The Jets' next drive ended when Pennington was intercepted by Nathan Vasher in Chicago territory. The Bears' game-breaking score came when Rex Grossman completed a short pass to Mark Bradley. The Jets' Drew Coleman fell down attempting to make the tackle, and Bradley had an open lane to the end zone to extend the Bears' lead to 10-0. The Bears then went into a ball-control offense, and the Jets could not muster anything."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many interceptions did Chad Pennington throw?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "2"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": " The first quarter was all about defense, as the teams traded punts until the Jets got the ball late in the first quarter at their own 24-yard line. On the drive, Chad Pennington converted key third downs to Brad Smith and Tim Dwight, and was soon faced with a 3rd-and-goal at the Bears' 6-yard line. Apparently unable to see an open Laveranues Coles, Pennington lobbed a pass towards Chris Baker that was intercepted by Brian Urlacher. With just under four minutes left in the half, Thomas Jones appeared to fumble and Kerry Rhodes recovered, but Chicago successfully challenged the play, denying the Jets a scoring opportunity. The game was scoreless at halftime. Eric Mangini, apparently remembering the success of his surprise onside kick against Indianapolis in Week 4, decided to open the second half with one. Unfortunately, this one was scooped up by Chicago's Chris Harris. On the Bears' first play, Jones broke off a 19-yard run, and Jones rushed every play on the drive that was capped off by a 20-yard field goal by Robbie Gould. The Jets' next drive ended when Pennington was intercepted by Nathan Vasher in Chicago territory. The Bears' game-breaking score came when Rex Grossman completed a short pass to Mark Bradley. The Jets' Drew Coleman fell down attempting to make the tackle, and Bradley had an open lane to the end zone to extend the Bears' lead to 10-0. The Bears then went into a ball-control offense, and the Jets could not muster anything."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which half had no scores, the first or the second?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "first"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": " Kellen Clemens was named the starting quarterback on Monday by Coach Eric Mangini, relegating Chad Pennington to the backup role indefinitely. However, Clemens would not be throwing to receiver Laveranues Coles, who ended a 104-game consecutive games played streak due to a concussion. Leon Washington got the Jets started immediately when he returned the opening kickoff 86 yards for a touchdown. The kickoff return touchdown was his third of the season, setting a Jets record. The teams traded field goals before Clemens led the Jets downfield, where he found tight end Joe Kowalewski on a one-yard touchdown. The Redskins responded with a 40-yard field goal from Shaun Suisham. They then surprised the Jets with an onside kick, which they successfully recovered, leading to another Suisham field goal near the end of the first half. Suisham continued to keep the Redskins in the game with a 40-yard field goal to start the third quarter, bringing the score to 17-12. The Jets drove deep into Redskins territory early in the fourth quarter when, on a pass completion to Jerricho Cotchery, Cotchery fumbled the ball, and the Redskins recovered. Mangini challenged the call believing the pass was incomplete, and therefore no fumble was possible, but the challenge was not upheld. The Redskins took advantage on the ensuing drive, and running back Clinton Portis, who had a huge game against the porous Jets run defense, scored on a one-yard touchdown to give Washington the lead. A two-point conversion from quarterback Jason Campbell to Antwaan Randle El put the Redskins up by three. The Jets eventually got the ball back late in the game, and Clemens led the offense on a 15-play drive ending with a Mike Nugent 30-yard field goal with ten seconds left to force overtime. The Jets won the coin toss to start the extra frame and received the ball first. They began with a 39-yard pass from Clemens to Cotchery, but the drive quickly stalled and the Jets were forced to punt. Campbell and Portis led the Redskins downfield into the field goal range of Suisham, who hit his fifth field goal of the day to give the Redskins the win and send the Jets to their sixth straight loss."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many field goals were made in the first half?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "4"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": " Kellen Clemens was named the starting quarterback on Monday by Coach Eric Mangini, relegating Chad Pennington to the backup role indefinitely. However, Clemens would not be throwing to receiver Laveranues Coles, who ended a 104-game consecutive games played streak due to a concussion. Leon Washington got the Jets started immediately when he returned the opening kickoff 86 yards for a touchdown. The kickoff return touchdown was his third of the season, setting a Jets record. The teams traded field goals before Clemens led the Jets downfield, where he found tight end Joe Kowalewski on a one-yard touchdown. The Redskins responded with a 40-yard field goal from Shaun Suisham. They then surprised the Jets with an onside kick, which they successfully recovered, leading to another Suisham field goal near the end of the first half. Suisham continued to keep the Redskins in the game with a 40-yard field goal to start the third quarter, bringing the score to 17-12. The Jets drove deep into Redskins territory early in the fourth quarter when, on a pass completion to Jerricho Cotchery, Cotchery fumbled the ball, and the Redskins recovered. Mangini challenged the call believing the pass was incomplete, and therefore no fumble was possible, but the challenge was not upheld. The Redskins took advantage on the ensuing drive, and running back Clinton Portis, who had a huge game against the porous Jets run defense, scored on a one-yard touchdown to give Washington the lead. A two-point conversion from quarterback Jason Campbell to Antwaan Randle El put the Redskins up by three. The Jets eventually got the ball back late in the game, and Clemens led the offense on a 15-play drive ending with a Mike Nugent 30-yard field goal with ten seconds left to force overtime. The Jets won the coin toss to start the extra frame and received the ball first. They began with a 39-yard pass from Clemens to Cotchery, but the drive quickly stalled and the Jets were forced to punt. Campbell and Portis led the Redskins downfield into the field goal range of Suisham, who hit his fifth field goal of the day to give the Redskins the win and send the Jets to their sixth straight loss."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many players scored one-yard touchdowns?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "2"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": " Kellen Clemens was named the starting quarterback on Monday by Coach Eric Mangini, relegating Chad Pennington to the backup role indefinitely. However, Clemens would not be throwing to receiver Laveranues Coles, who ended a 104-game consecutive games played streak due to a concussion. Leon Washington got the Jets started immediately when he returned the opening kickoff 86 yards for a touchdown. The kickoff return touchdown was his third of the season, setting a Jets record. The teams traded field goals before Clemens led the Jets downfield, where he found tight end Joe Kowalewski on a one-yard touchdown. The Redskins responded with a 40-yard field goal from Shaun Suisham. They then surprised the Jets with an onside kick, which they successfully recovered, leading to another Suisham field goal near the end of the first half. Suisham continued to keep the Redskins in the game with a 40-yard field goal to start the third quarter, bringing the score to 17-12. The Jets drove deep into Redskins territory early in the fourth quarter when, on a pass completion to Jerricho Cotchery, Cotchery fumbled the ball, and the Redskins recovered. Mangini challenged the call believing the pass was incomplete, and therefore no fumble was possible, but the challenge was not upheld. The Redskins took advantage on the ensuing drive, and running back Clinton Portis, who had a huge game against the porous Jets run defense, scored on a one-yard touchdown to give Washington the lead. A two-point conversion from quarterback Jason Campbell to Antwaan Randle El put the Redskins up by three. The Jets eventually got the ball back late in the game, and Clemens led the offense on a 15-play drive ending with a Mike Nugent 30-yard field goal with ten seconds left to force overtime. The Jets won the coin toss to start the extra frame and received the ball first. They began with a 39-yard pass from Clemens to Cotchery, but the drive quickly stalled and the Jets were forced to punt. Campbell and Portis led the Redskins downfield into the field goal range of Suisham, who hit his fifth field goal of the day to give the Redskins the win and send the Jets to their sixth straight loss."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many field goals of at least 40 yards were made?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "2"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The month-long truce went into effect on 11 June, 1948. On the same day, the first group of 36 observers arrived via Cairo, Egypt and continued to arrive for the next three days. The first truce did not last long due to widespread violence which again erupted. As a result, the observers were withdrawn on 9 July 1948. The second truce, indefinite in length, was called by the United Nations Security Council on 15 July 1948. This declaration was to be put into effect on 18 July 1948. It was from United Nations Security Council Resolution 54 that the Mediator was instructed to supervise the observance of the truce and to establish procedures for examining alleged breaches of the truce since 11 June 1948, and authorized the Mediator to deal with breaches so far as it was within the capacity of the Mediator to do so by appropriate local action, also the Security Council Resolution 54 requested the Mediator to keep the Security Council informed concerning the operation of the truce and where necessary to take appropriate action. During the autumn of 1948, UNTSO was re-established with an increase in size to supervise the Second Truce. The first group of observers to serve in Palestine under the UN Mediator, Count Folke Bernadotte, arrived in Rhodes at 6 P.M. GMT 20 July. It included 41 Americans and about 25 Belgians and were deployed on 21 July 1948. The initial group was quickly expanded to 93 in total because of the tremendous area that had to be covered. As the number of personnel grew, the United Nations Secretariat (of Personnel) supported the creation of the United Nations Truce Supervision Organization (UNTSO), the same organization UN Military Observers are assigned to today. Initially, the command was headed by a Chief-of-Staff (a general officer from one of the participating countries) in accordance with the personal direction of the Mediator, (a civilian)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "When did observers arrive from Cairo?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "11 June 1948"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The month-long truce went into effect on 11 June, 1948. On the same day, the first group of 36 observers arrived via Cairo, Egypt and continued to arrive for the next three days. The first truce did not last long due to widespread violence which again erupted. As a result, the observers were withdrawn on 9 July 1948. The second truce, indefinite in length, was called by the United Nations Security Council on 15 July 1948. This declaration was to be put into effect on 18 July 1948. It was from United Nations Security Council Resolution 54 that the Mediator was instructed to supervise the observance of the truce and to establish procedures for examining alleged breaches of the truce since 11 June 1948, and authorized the Mediator to deal with breaches so far as it was within the capacity of the Mediator to do so by appropriate local action, also the Security Council Resolution 54 requested the Mediator to keep the Security Council informed concerning the operation of the truce and where necessary to take appropriate action. During the autumn of 1948, UNTSO was re-established with an increase in size to supervise the Second Truce. The first group of observers to serve in Palestine under the UN Mediator, Count Folke Bernadotte, arrived in Rhodes at 6 P.M. GMT 20 July. It included 41 Americans and about 25 Belgians and were deployed on 21 July 1948. The initial group was quickly expanded to 93 in total because of the tremendous area that had to be covered. As the number of personnel grew, the United Nations Secretariat (of Personnel) supported the creation of the United Nations Truce Supervision Organization (UNTSO), the same organization UN Military Observers are assigned to today. Initially, the command was headed by a Chief-of-Staff (a general officer from one of the participating countries) in accordance with the personal direction of the Mediator, (a civilian)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many months did the observers stay before they were removed due to the eruption of violence?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "1"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The month-long truce went into effect on 11 June, 1948. On the same day, the first group of 36 observers arrived via Cairo, Egypt and continued to arrive for the next three days. The first truce did not last long due to widespread violence which again erupted. As a result, the observers were withdrawn on 9 July 1948. The second truce, indefinite in length, was called by the United Nations Security Council on 15 July 1948. This declaration was to be put into effect on 18 July 1948. It was from United Nations Security Council Resolution 54 that the Mediator was instructed to supervise the observance of the truce and to establish procedures for examining alleged breaches of the truce since 11 June 1948, and authorized the Mediator to deal with breaches so far as it was within the capacity of the Mediator to do so by appropriate local action, also the Security Council Resolution 54 requested the Mediator to keep the Security Council informed concerning the operation of the truce and where necessary to take appropriate action. During the autumn of 1948, UNTSO was re-established with an increase in size to supervise the Second Truce. The first group of observers to serve in Palestine under the UN Mediator, Count Folke Bernadotte, arrived in Rhodes at 6 P.M. GMT 20 July. It included 41 Americans and about 25 Belgians and were deployed on 21 July 1948. The initial group was quickly expanded to 93 in total because of the tremendous area that had to be covered. As the number of personnel grew, the United Nations Secretariat (of Personnel) supported the creation of the United Nations Truce Supervision Organization (UNTSO), the same organization UN Military Observers are assigned to today. Initially, the command was headed by a Chief-of-Staff (a general officer from one of the participating countries) in accordance with the personal direction of the Mediator, (a civilian)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many days after the observers left was the second truce called?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "6"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The month-long truce went into effect on 11 June, 1948. On the same day, the first group of 36 observers arrived via Cairo, Egypt and continued to arrive for the next three days. The first truce did not last long due to widespread violence which again erupted. As a result, the observers were withdrawn on 9 July 1948. The second truce, indefinite in length, was called by the United Nations Security Council on 15 July 1948. This declaration was to be put into effect on 18 July 1948. It was from United Nations Security Council Resolution 54 that the Mediator was instructed to supervise the observance of the truce and to establish procedures for examining alleged breaches of the truce since 11 June 1948, and authorized the Mediator to deal with breaches so far as it was within the capacity of the Mediator to do so by appropriate local action, also the Security Council Resolution 54 requested the Mediator to keep the Security Council informed concerning the operation of the truce and where necessary to take appropriate action. During the autumn of 1948, UNTSO was re-established with an increase in size to supervise the Second Truce. The first group of observers to serve in Palestine under the UN Mediator, Count Folke Bernadotte, arrived in Rhodes at 6 P.M. GMT 20 July. It included 41 Americans and about 25 Belgians and were deployed on 21 July 1948. The initial group was quickly expanded to 93 in total because of the tremendous area that had to be covered. As the number of personnel grew, the United Nations Secretariat (of Personnel) supported the creation of the United Nations Truce Supervision Organization (UNTSO), the same organization UN Military Observers are assigned to today. Initially, the command was headed by a Chief-of-Staff (a general officer from one of the participating countries) in accordance with the personal direction of the Mediator, (a civilian)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many days after the United Nations Security Council met did United Nations Security Council Resolution 54 go into effect?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "3"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The month-long truce went into effect on 11 June, 1948. On the same day, the first group of 36 observers arrived via Cairo, Egypt and continued to arrive for the next three days. The first truce did not last long due to widespread violence which again erupted. As a result, the observers were withdrawn on 9 July 1948. The second truce, indefinite in length, was called by the United Nations Security Council on 15 July 1948. This declaration was to be put into effect on 18 July 1948. It was from United Nations Security Council Resolution 54 that the Mediator was instructed to supervise the observance of the truce and to establish procedures for examining alleged breaches of the truce since 11 June 1948, and authorized the Mediator to deal with breaches so far as it was within the capacity of the Mediator to do so by appropriate local action, also the Security Council Resolution 54 requested the Mediator to keep the Security Council informed concerning the operation of the truce and where necessary to take appropriate action. During the autumn of 1948, UNTSO was re-established with an increase in size to supervise the Second Truce. The first group of observers to serve in Palestine under the UN Mediator, Count Folke Bernadotte, arrived in Rhodes at 6 P.M. GMT 20 July. It included 41 Americans and about 25 Belgians and were deployed on 21 July 1948. The initial group was quickly expanded to 93 in total because of the tremendous area that had to be covered. As the number of personnel grew, the United Nations Secretariat (of Personnel) supported the creation of the United Nations Truce Supervision Organization (UNTSO), the same organization UN Military Observers are assigned to today. Initially, the command was headed by a Chief-of-Staff (a general officer from one of the participating countries) in accordance with the personal direction of the Mediator, (a civilian)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many days after the first group of observers left did the second group of observers arrive?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "11"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The month-long truce went into effect on 11 June, 1948. On the same day, the first group of 36 observers arrived via Cairo, Egypt and continued to arrive for the next three days. The first truce did not last long due to widespread violence which again erupted. As a result, the observers were withdrawn on 9 July 1948. The second truce, indefinite in length, was called by the United Nations Security Council on 15 July 1948. This declaration was to be put into effect on 18 July 1948. It was from United Nations Security Council Resolution 54 that the Mediator was instructed to supervise the observance of the truce and to establish procedures for examining alleged breaches of the truce since 11 June 1948, and authorized the Mediator to deal with breaches so far as it was within the capacity of the Mediator to do so by appropriate local action, also the Security Council Resolution 54 requested the Mediator to keep the Security Council informed concerning the operation of the truce and where necessary to take appropriate action. During the autumn of 1948, UNTSO was re-established with an increase in size to supervise the Second Truce. The first group of observers to serve in Palestine under the UN Mediator, Count Folke Bernadotte, arrived in Rhodes at 6 P.M. GMT 20 July. It included 41 Americans and about 25 Belgians and were deployed on 21 July 1948. The initial group was quickly expanded to 93 in total because of the tremendous area that had to be covered. As the number of personnel grew, the United Nations Secretariat (of Personnel) supported the creation of the United Nations Truce Supervision Organization (UNTSO), the same organization UN Military Observers are assigned to today. Initially, the command was headed by a Chief-of-Staff (a general officer from one of the participating countries) in accordance with the personal direction of the Mediator, (a civilian)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Where there more Americans or Belgians among the group of observers?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Americans"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The month-long truce went into effect on 11 June, 1948. On the same day, the first group of 36 observers arrived via Cairo, Egypt and continued to arrive for the next three days. The first truce did not last long due to widespread violence which again erupted. As a result, the observers were withdrawn on 9 July 1948. The second truce, indefinite in length, was called by the United Nations Security Council on 15 July 1948. This declaration was to be put into effect on 18 July 1948. It was from United Nations Security Council Resolution 54 that the Mediator was instructed to supervise the observance of the truce and to establish procedures for examining alleged breaches of the truce since 11 June 1948, and authorized the Mediator to deal with breaches so far as it was within the capacity of the Mediator to do so by appropriate local action, also the Security Council Resolution 54 requested the Mediator to keep the Security Council informed concerning the operation of the truce and where necessary to take appropriate action. During the autumn of 1948, UNTSO was re-established with an increase in size to supervise the Second Truce. The first group of observers to serve in Palestine under the UN Mediator, Count Folke Bernadotte, arrived in Rhodes at 6 P.M. GMT 20 July. It included 41 Americans and about 25 Belgians and were deployed on 21 July 1948. The initial group was quickly expanded to 93 in total because of the tremendous area that had to be covered. As the number of personnel grew, the United Nations Secretariat (of Personnel) supported the creation of the United Nations Truce Supervision Organization (UNTSO), the same organization UN Military Observers are assigned to today. Initially, the command was headed by a Chief-of-Staff (a general officer from one of the participating countries) in accordance with the personal direction of the Mediator, (a civilian)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many more Americans than Belgians were in the the second group of observers?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "16"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The month-long truce went into effect on 11 June, 1948. On the same day, the first group of 36 observers arrived via Cairo, Egypt and continued to arrive for the next three days. The first truce did not last long due to widespread violence which again erupted. As a result, the observers were withdrawn on 9 July 1948. The second truce, indefinite in length, was called by the United Nations Security Council on 15 July 1948. This declaration was to be put into effect on 18 July 1948. It was from United Nations Security Council Resolution 54 that the Mediator was instructed to supervise the observance of the truce and to establish procedures for examining alleged breaches of the truce since 11 June 1948, and authorized the Mediator to deal with breaches so far as it was within the capacity of the Mediator to do so by appropriate local action, also the Security Council Resolution 54 requested the Mediator to keep the Security Council informed concerning the operation of the truce and where necessary to take appropriate action. During the autumn of 1948, UNTSO was re-established with an increase in size to supervise the Second Truce. The first group of observers to serve in Palestine under the UN Mediator, Count Folke Bernadotte, arrived in Rhodes at 6 P.M. GMT 20 July. It included 41 Americans and about 25 Belgians and were deployed on 21 July 1948. The initial group was quickly expanded to 93 in total because of the tremendous area that had to be covered. As the number of personnel grew, the United Nations Secretariat (of Personnel) supported the creation of the United Nations Truce Supervision Organization (UNTSO), the same organization UN Military Observers are assigned to today. Initially, the command was headed by a Chief-of-Staff (a general officer from one of the participating countries) in accordance with the personal direction of the Mediator, (a civilian)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many more Americans than Belgians were deployed?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "16"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": " Following their home loss to the Packers, the Rams flew to Candlestick Park for a Week 4 NFC West duel with their hated rival, the San Francisco 49ers. Due to an injury to Marc Bulger, quarterback Kyle Boller got the start. After a scoreless first quarter, St. Louis' seasonal struggles continued on the 49ers' second punt of the game. The ball would hit backup cornerback Quincy Butler's foot and roll into the endzone where backup Niners linebacker Scott McKillop would land on it for a touchdown. San Francisco would continue its dominating run in the third quarter with quarterback Shaun Hill hooking up on a 13-yard touchdown pass to tight end Vernon Davis, followed by linebacker Patrick Willis returning an interception 23 yards for a touchdown. The 49ers would wrap up their victory march in the fourth quarter with Hill finding wide receiver Josh Morgan on a 24-yard touchdown pass, followed by defensive tackle Ray McDonald returning a fumble 11 yards for a touchdown. With their second shutout loss of the season, the Rams fell to 0-4."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many yards was the longest passing touchdown?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "24"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The 2011 Thailand Country Report provides population numbers for mountain peoples (hill tribes) and ethnic communities in the Northeast and is explicit about its main reliance on the Mahidol University Ethnolinguistic Maps of Thailand data. Thus, though over 3.288 million people in the Northeast alone could not be categorised, the population and percentages of other ethnic communities circa 1997 are known for all of Thailand and constitute minimum populations. In descending order, the largest (equal to or greater than 400,000) are a) 15,080,000 Lao (24.9 percent) consisting of the Thai Lao (14 million) and other smaller Lao groups, namely the Thai Loei (400–500,000), Lao Lom (350,000), Lao Wiang/Klang (200,000), Lao Khrang (90,000), Lao Ngaew (30,000), and Lao Ti (10,000; b) six million Khon Muang (9.9 percent, also called Northern Thais); c) 4.5 million Pak Tai (7.5 percent, also called Southern Thais); d) 1.4 million Khmer Leu (2.3 percent, also called Northern Khmer); e) 900,000 Malay (1.5%); f) 500,000 Ngaw (0.8 percent); g) 470,000 Phu Thai (0.8 percent); h) 400,000 Kuy/Kuay (also known as Suay) (0.7 percent), and i) 350,000 Karen (0.6 percent). Thai Chinese, those of significant Chinese heritage, are 14% of the population, while Thais with partial Chinese ancestry comprise up to 40% of the population. Thai Malays represent 3% of the population, with the remainder consisting of Mon people, Khmers and various \"Hill tribe (Thailand)\". The countrys official language is Thai language and the primary religion is Theravada Buddhism, which is practised by around 95% of the population."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which population is larger Thai Lao or Lao Khrang?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Thai Lao"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The 2011 Thailand Country Report provides population numbers for mountain peoples (hill tribes) and ethnic communities in the Northeast and is explicit about its main reliance on the Mahidol University Ethnolinguistic Maps of Thailand data. Thus, though over 3.288 million people in the Northeast alone could not be categorised, the population and percentages of other ethnic communities circa 1997 are known for all of Thailand and constitute minimum populations. In descending order, the largest (equal to or greater than 400,000) are a) 15,080,000 Lao (24.9 percent) consisting of the Thai Lao (14 million) and other smaller Lao groups, namely the Thai Loei (400–500,000), Lao Lom (350,000), Lao Wiang/Klang (200,000), Lao Khrang (90,000), Lao Ngaew (30,000), and Lao Ti (10,000; b) six million Khon Muang (9.9 percent, also called Northern Thais); c) 4.5 million Pak Tai (7.5 percent, also called Southern Thais); d) 1.4 million Khmer Leu (2.3 percent, also called Northern Khmer); e) 900,000 Malay (1.5%); f) 500,000 Ngaw (0.8 percent); g) 470,000 Phu Thai (0.8 percent); h) 400,000 Kuy/Kuay (also known as Suay) (0.7 percent), and i) 350,000 Karen (0.6 percent). Thai Chinese, those of significant Chinese heritage, are 14% of the population, while Thais with partial Chinese ancestry comprise up to 40% of the population. Thai Malays represent 3% of the population, with the remainder consisting of Mon people, Khmers and various \"Hill tribe (Thailand)\". The countrys official language is Thai language and the primary religion is Theravada Buddhism, which is practised by around 95% of the population."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many more people are in the Lao Lom population than in the Lao Ngaew population?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "320000"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The 2011 Thailand Country Report provides population numbers for mountain peoples (hill tribes) and ethnic communities in the Northeast and is explicit about its main reliance on the Mahidol University Ethnolinguistic Maps of Thailand data. Thus, though over 3.288 million people in the Northeast alone could not be categorised, the population and percentages of other ethnic communities circa 1997 are known for all of Thailand and constitute minimum populations. In descending order, the largest (equal to or greater than 400,000) are a) 15,080,000 Lao (24.9 percent) consisting of the Thai Lao (14 million) and other smaller Lao groups, namely the Thai Loei (400–500,000), Lao Lom (350,000), Lao Wiang/Klang (200,000), Lao Khrang (90,000), Lao Ngaew (30,000), and Lao Ti (10,000; b) six million Khon Muang (9.9 percent, also called Northern Thais); c) 4.5 million Pak Tai (7.5 percent, also called Southern Thais); d) 1.4 million Khmer Leu (2.3 percent, also called Northern Khmer); e) 900,000 Malay (1.5%); f) 500,000 Ngaw (0.8 percent); g) 470,000 Phu Thai (0.8 percent); h) 400,000 Kuy/Kuay (also known as Suay) (0.7 percent), and i) 350,000 Karen (0.6 percent). Thai Chinese, those of significant Chinese heritage, are 14% of the population, while Thais with partial Chinese ancestry comprise up to 40% of the population. Thai Malays represent 3% of the population, with the remainder consisting of Mon people, Khmers and various \"Hill tribe (Thailand)\". The countrys official language is Thai language and the primary religion is Theravada Buddhism, which is practised by around 95% of the population."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which communities have the largest population, Lao Lom or Thai Loei?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Thai Loei"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The 2011 Thailand Country Report provides population numbers for mountain peoples (hill tribes) and ethnic communities in the Northeast and is explicit about its main reliance on the Mahidol University Ethnolinguistic Maps of Thailand data. Thus, though over 3.288 million people in the Northeast alone could not be categorised, the population and percentages of other ethnic communities circa 1997 are known for all of Thailand and constitute minimum populations. In descending order, the largest (equal to or greater than 400,000) are a) 15,080,000 Lao (24.9 percent) consisting of the Thai Lao (14 million) and other smaller Lao groups, namely the Thai Loei (400–500,000), Lao Lom (350,000), Lao Wiang/Klang (200,000), Lao Khrang (90,000), Lao Ngaew (30,000), and Lao Ti (10,000; b) six million Khon Muang (9.9 percent, also called Northern Thais); c) 4.5 million Pak Tai (7.5 percent, also called Southern Thais); d) 1.4 million Khmer Leu (2.3 percent, also called Northern Khmer); e) 900,000 Malay (1.5%); f) 500,000 Ngaw (0.8 percent); g) 470,000 Phu Thai (0.8 percent); h) 400,000 Kuy/Kuay (also known as Suay) (0.7 percent), and i) 350,000 Karen (0.6 percent). Thai Chinese, those of significant Chinese heritage, are 14% of the population, while Thais with partial Chinese ancestry comprise up to 40% of the population. Thai Malays represent 3% of the population, with the remainder consisting of Mon people, Khmers and various \"Hill tribe (Thailand)\". The countrys official language is Thai language and the primary religion is Theravada Buddhism, which is practised by around 95% of the population."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which was there a higher population of, Lao Khrang or Lao Ngaew?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Lao Khrang"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The 2011 Thailand Country Report provides population numbers for mountain peoples (hill tribes) and ethnic communities in the Northeast and is explicit about its main reliance on the Mahidol University Ethnolinguistic Maps of Thailand data. Thus, though over 3.288 million people in the Northeast alone could not be categorised, the population and percentages of other ethnic communities circa 1997 are known for all of Thailand and constitute minimum populations. In descending order, the largest (equal to or greater than 400,000) are a) 15,080,000 Lao (24.9 percent) consisting of the Thai Lao (14 million) and other smaller Lao groups, namely the Thai Loei (400–500,000), Lao Lom (350,000), Lao Wiang/Klang (200,000), Lao Khrang (90,000), Lao Ngaew (30,000), and Lao Ti (10,000; b) six million Khon Muang (9.9 percent, also called Northern Thais); c) 4.5 million Pak Tai (7.5 percent, also called Southern Thais); d) 1.4 million Khmer Leu (2.3 percent, also called Northern Khmer); e) 900,000 Malay (1.5%); f) 500,000 Ngaw (0.8 percent); g) 470,000 Phu Thai (0.8 percent); h) 400,000 Kuy/Kuay (also known as Suay) (0.7 percent), and i) 350,000 Karen (0.6 percent). Thai Chinese, those of significant Chinese heritage, are 14% of the population, while Thais with partial Chinese ancestry comprise up to 40% of the population. Thai Malays represent 3% of the population, with the remainder consisting of Mon people, Khmers and various \"Hill tribe (Thailand)\". The countrys official language is Thai language and the primary religion is Theravada Buddhism, which is practised by around 95% of the population."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many more Lao Khrang were there compared to Lao Ngaew?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "60000"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The 2011 Thailand Country Report provides population numbers for mountain peoples (hill tribes) and ethnic communities in the Northeast and is explicit about its main reliance on the Mahidol University Ethnolinguistic Maps of Thailand data. Thus, though over 3.288 million people in the Northeast alone could not be categorised, the population and percentages of other ethnic communities circa 1997 are known for all of Thailand and constitute minimum populations. In descending order, the largest (equal to or greater than 400,000) are a) 15,080,000 Lao (24.9 percent) consisting of the Thai Lao (14 million) and other smaller Lao groups, namely the Thai Loei (400–500,000), Lao Lom (350,000), Lao Wiang/Klang (200,000), Lao Khrang (90,000), Lao Ngaew (30,000), and Lao Ti (10,000; b) six million Khon Muang (9.9 percent, also called Northern Thais); c) 4.5 million Pak Tai (7.5 percent, also called Southern Thais); d) 1.4 million Khmer Leu (2.3 percent, also called Northern Khmer); e) 900,000 Malay (1.5%); f) 500,000 Ngaw (0.8 percent); g) 470,000 Phu Thai (0.8 percent); h) 400,000 Kuy/Kuay (also known as Suay) (0.7 percent), and i) 350,000 Karen (0.6 percent). Thai Chinese, those of significant Chinese heritage, are 14% of the population, while Thais with partial Chinese ancestry comprise up to 40% of the population. Thai Malays represent 3% of the population, with the remainder consisting of Mon people, Khmers and various \"Hill tribe (Thailand)\". The countrys official language is Thai language and the primary religion is Theravada Buddhism, which is practised by around 95% of the population."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many percent of the people were not Lao?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "75.1"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The 2011 Thailand Country Report provides population numbers for mountain peoples (hill tribes) and ethnic communities in the Northeast and is explicit about its main reliance on the Mahidol University Ethnolinguistic Maps of Thailand data. Thus, though over 3.288 million people in the Northeast alone could not be categorised, the population and percentages of other ethnic communities circa 1997 are known for all of Thailand and constitute minimum populations. In descending order, the largest (equal to or greater than 400,000) are a) 15,080,000 Lao (24.9 percent) consisting of the Thai Lao (14 million) and other smaller Lao groups, namely the Thai Loei (400–500,000), Lao Lom (350,000), Lao Wiang/Klang (200,000), Lao Khrang (90,000), Lao Ngaew (30,000), and Lao Ti (10,000; b) six million Khon Muang (9.9 percent, also called Northern Thais); c) 4.5 million Pak Tai (7.5 percent, also called Southern Thais); d) 1.4 million Khmer Leu (2.3 percent, also called Northern Khmer); e) 900,000 Malay (1.5%); f) 500,000 Ngaw (0.8 percent); g) 470,000 Phu Thai (0.8 percent); h) 400,000 Kuy/Kuay (also known as Suay) (0.7 percent), and i) 350,000 Karen (0.6 percent). Thai Chinese, those of significant Chinese heritage, are 14% of the population, while Thais with partial Chinese ancestry comprise up to 40% of the population. Thai Malays represent 3% of the population, with the remainder consisting of Mon people, Khmers and various \"Hill tribe (Thailand)\". The countrys official language is Thai language and the primary religion is Theravada Buddhism, which is practised by around 95% of the population."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many percent of the people were not Khon Muang?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "90.1"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The 2011 Thailand Country Report provides population numbers for mountain peoples (hill tribes) and ethnic communities in the Northeast and is explicit about its main reliance on the Mahidol University Ethnolinguistic Maps of Thailand data. Thus, though over 3.288 million people in the Northeast alone could not be categorised, the population and percentages of other ethnic communities circa 1997 are known for all of Thailand and constitute minimum populations. In descending order, the largest (equal to or greater than 400,000) are a) 15,080,000 Lao (24.9 percent) consisting of the Thai Lao (14 million) and other smaller Lao groups, namely the Thai Loei (400–500,000), Lao Lom (350,000), Lao Wiang/Klang (200,000), Lao Khrang (90,000), Lao Ngaew (30,000), and Lao Ti (10,000; b) six million Khon Muang (9.9 percent, also called Northern Thais); c) 4.5 million Pak Tai (7.5 percent, also called Southern Thais); d) 1.4 million Khmer Leu (2.3 percent, also called Northern Khmer); e) 900,000 Malay (1.5%); f) 500,000 Ngaw (0.8 percent); g) 470,000 Phu Thai (0.8 percent); h) 400,000 Kuy/Kuay (also known as Suay) (0.7 percent), and i) 350,000 Karen (0.6 percent). Thai Chinese, those of significant Chinese heritage, are 14% of the population, while Thais with partial Chinese ancestry comprise up to 40% of the population. Thai Malays represent 3% of the population, with the remainder consisting of Mon people, Khmers and various \"Hill tribe (Thailand)\". The countrys official language is Thai language and the primary religion is Theravada Buddhism, which is practised by around 95% of the population."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many percent of the people were not Pak Tai?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "92.5"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The 2011 Thailand Country Report provides population numbers for mountain peoples (hill tribes) and ethnic communities in the Northeast and is explicit about its main reliance on the Mahidol University Ethnolinguistic Maps of Thailand data. Thus, though over 3.288 million people in the Northeast alone could not be categorised, the population and percentages of other ethnic communities circa 1997 are known for all of Thailand and constitute minimum populations. In descending order, the largest (equal to or greater than 400,000) are a) 15,080,000 Lao (24.9 percent) consisting of the Thai Lao (14 million) and other smaller Lao groups, namely the Thai Loei (400–500,000), Lao Lom (350,000), Lao Wiang/Klang (200,000), Lao Khrang (90,000), Lao Ngaew (30,000), and Lao Ti (10,000; b) six million Khon Muang (9.9 percent, also called Northern Thais); c) 4.5 million Pak Tai (7.5 percent, also called Southern Thais); d) 1.4 million Khmer Leu (2.3 percent, also called Northern Khmer); e) 900,000 Malay (1.5%); f) 500,000 Ngaw (0.8 percent); g) 470,000 Phu Thai (0.8 percent); h) 400,000 Kuy/Kuay (also known as Suay) (0.7 percent), and i) 350,000 Karen (0.6 percent). Thai Chinese, those of significant Chinese heritage, are 14% of the population, while Thais with partial Chinese ancestry comprise up to 40% of the population. Thai Malays represent 3% of the population, with the remainder consisting of Mon people, Khmers and various \"Hill tribe (Thailand)\". The countrys official language is Thai language and the primary religion is Theravada Buddhism, which is practised by around 95% of the population."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many percent of people were not Khmer Leu?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "97.7"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The 2011 Thailand Country Report provides population numbers for mountain peoples (hill tribes) and ethnic communities in the Northeast and is explicit about its main reliance on the Mahidol University Ethnolinguistic Maps of Thailand data. Thus, though over 3.288 million people in the Northeast alone could not be categorised, the population and percentages of other ethnic communities circa 1997 are known for all of Thailand and constitute minimum populations. In descending order, the largest (equal to or greater than 400,000) are a) 15,080,000 Lao (24.9 percent) consisting of the Thai Lao (14 million) and other smaller Lao groups, namely the Thai Loei (400–500,000), Lao Lom (350,000), Lao Wiang/Klang (200,000), Lao Khrang (90,000), Lao Ngaew (30,000), and Lao Ti (10,000; b) six million Khon Muang (9.9 percent, also called Northern Thais); c) 4.5 million Pak Tai (7.5 percent, also called Southern Thais); d) 1.4 million Khmer Leu (2.3 percent, also called Northern Khmer); e) 900,000 Malay (1.5%); f) 500,000 Ngaw (0.8 percent); g) 470,000 Phu Thai (0.8 percent); h) 400,000 Kuy/Kuay (also known as Suay) (0.7 percent), and i) 350,000 Karen (0.6 percent). Thai Chinese, those of significant Chinese heritage, are 14% of the population, while Thais with partial Chinese ancestry comprise up to 40% of the population. Thai Malays represent 3% of the population, with the remainder consisting of Mon people, Khmers and various \"Hill tribe (Thailand)\". The countrys official language is Thai language and the primary religion is Theravada Buddhism, which is practised by around 95% of the population."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many percent of people were not Malay?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "98.5"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The 2011 Thailand Country Report provides population numbers for mountain peoples (hill tribes) and ethnic communities in the Northeast and is explicit about its main reliance on the Mahidol University Ethnolinguistic Maps of Thailand data. Thus, though over 3.288 million people in the Northeast alone could not be categorised, the population and percentages of other ethnic communities circa 1997 are known for all of Thailand and constitute minimum populations. In descending order, the largest (equal to or greater than 400,000) are a) 15,080,000 Lao (24.9 percent) consisting of the Thai Lao (14 million) and other smaller Lao groups, namely the Thai Loei (400–500,000), Lao Lom (350,000), Lao Wiang/Klang (200,000), Lao Khrang (90,000), Lao Ngaew (30,000), and Lao Ti (10,000; b) six million Khon Muang (9.9 percent, also called Northern Thais); c) 4.5 million Pak Tai (7.5 percent, also called Southern Thais); d) 1.4 million Khmer Leu (2.3 percent, also called Northern Khmer); e) 900,000 Malay (1.5%); f) 500,000 Ngaw (0.8 percent); g) 470,000 Phu Thai (0.8 percent); h) 400,000 Kuy/Kuay (also known as Suay) (0.7 percent), and i) 350,000 Karen (0.6 percent). Thai Chinese, those of significant Chinese heritage, are 14% of the population, while Thais with partial Chinese ancestry comprise up to 40% of the population. Thai Malays represent 3% of the population, with the remainder consisting of Mon people, Khmers and various \"Hill tribe (Thailand)\". The countrys official language is Thai language and the primary religion is Theravada Buddhism, which is practised by around 95% of the population."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many percent of people were not Ngaw?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "99.2"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The 2011 Thailand Country Report provides population numbers for mountain peoples (hill tribes) and ethnic communities in the Northeast and is explicit about its main reliance on the Mahidol University Ethnolinguistic Maps of Thailand data. Thus, though over 3.288 million people in the Northeast alone could not be categorised, the population and percentages of other ethnic communities circa 1997 are known for all of Thailand and constitute minimum populations. In descending order, the largest (equal to or greater than 400,000) are a) 15,080,000 Lao (24.9 percent) consisting of the Thai Lao (14 million) and other smaller Lao groups, namely the Thai Loei (400–500,000), Lao Lom (350,000), Lao Wiang/Klang (200,000), Lao Khrang (90,000), Lao Ngaew (30,000), and Lao Ti (10,000; b) six million Khon Muang (9.9 percent, also called Northern Thais); c) 4.5 million Pak Tai (7.5 percent, also called Southern Thais); d) 1.4 million Khmer Leu (2.3 percent, also called Northern Khmer); e) 900,000 Malay (1.5%); f) 500,000 Ngaw (0.8 percent); g) 470,000 Phu Thai (0.8 percent); h) 400,000 Kuy/Kuay (also known as Suay) (0.7 percent), and i) 350,000 Karen (0.6 percent). Thai Chinese, those of significant Chinese heritage, are 14% of the population, while Thais with partial Chinese ancestry comprise up to 40% of the population. Thai Malays represent 3% of the population, with the remainder consisting of Mon people, Khmers and various \"Hill tribe (Thailand)\". The countrys official language is Thai language and the primary religion is Theravada Buddhism, which is practised by around 95% of the population."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many percent of people were not Phu Thai?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "99.2"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The 2011 Thailand Country Report provides population numbers for mountain peoples (hill tribes) and ethnic communities in the Northeast and is explicit about its main reliance on the Mahidol University Ethnolinguistic Maps of Thailand data. Thus, though over 3.288 million people in the Northeast alone could not be categorised, the population and percentages of other ethnic communities circa 1997 are known for all of Thailand and constitute minimum populations. In descending order, the largest (equal to or greater than 400,000) are a) 15,080,000 Lao (24.9 percent) consisting of the Thai Lao (14 million) and other smaller Lao groups, namely the Thai Loei (400–500,000), Lao Lom (350,000), Lao Wiang/Klang (200,000), Lao Khrang (90,000), Lao Ngaew (30,000), and Lao Ti (10,000; b) six million Khon Muang (9.9 percent, also called Northern Thais); c) 4.5 million Pak Tai (7.5 percent, also called Southern Thais); d) 1.4 million Khmer Leu (2.3 percent, also called Northern Khmer); e) 900,000 Malay (1.5%); f) 500,000 Ngaw (0.8 percent); g) 470,000 Phu Thai (0.8 percent); h) 400,000 Kuy/Kuay (also known as Suay) (0.7 percent), and i) 350,000 Karen (0.6 percent). Thai Chinese, those of significant Chinese heritage, are 14% of the population, while Thais with partial Chinese ancestry comprise up to 40% of the population. Thai Malays represent 3% of the population, with the remainder consisting of Mon people, Khmers and various \"Hill tribe (Thailand)\". The countrys official language is Thai language and the primary religion is Theravada Buddhism, which is practised by around 95% of the population."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many percent of people were not Kuy/Kuay?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "99.3"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The 2011 Thailand Country Report provides population numbers for mountain peoples (hill tribes) and ethnic communities in the Northeast and is explicit about its main reliance on the Mahidol University Ethnolinguistic Maps of Thailand data. Thus, though over 3.288 million people in the Northeast alone could not be categorised, the population and percentages of other ethnic communities circa 1997 are known for all of Thailand and constitute minimum populations. In descending order, the largest (equal to or greater than 400,000) are a) 15,080,000 Lao (24.9 percent) consisting of the Thai Lao (14 million) and other smaller Lao groups, namely the Thai Loei (400–500,000), Lao Lom (350,000), Lao Wiang/Klang (200,000), Lao Khrang (90,000), Lao Ngaew (30,000), and Lao Ti (10,000; b) six million Khon Muang (9.9 percent, also called Northern Thais); c) 4.5 million Pak Tai (7.5 percent, also called Southern Thais); d) 1.4 million Khmer Leu (2.3 percent, also called Northern Khmer); e) 900,000 Malay (1.5%); f) 500,000 Ngaw (0.8 percent); g) 470,000 Phu Thai (0.8 percent); h) 400,000 Kuy/Kuay (also known as Suay) (0.7 percent), and i) 350,000 Karen (0.6 percent). Thai Chinese, those of significant Chinese heritage, are 14% of the population, while Thais with partial Chinese ancestry comprise up to 40% of the population. Thai Malays represent 3% of the population, with the remainder consisting of Mon people, Khmers and various \"Hill tribe (Thailand)\". The countrys official language is Thai language and the primary religion is Theravada Buddhism, which is practised by around 95% of the population."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many percent of people were not Karen?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "99.4"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The 2011 Thailand Country Report provides population numbers for mountain peoples (hill tribes) and ethnic communities in the Northeast and is explicit about its main reliance on the Mahidol University Ethnolinguistic Maps of Thailand data. Thus, though over 3.288 million people in the Northeast alone could not be categorised, the population and percentages of other ethnic communities circa 1997 are known for all of Thailand and constitute minimum populations. In descending order, the largest (equal to or greater than 400,000) are a) 15,080,000 Lao (24.9 percent) consisting of the Thai Lao (14 million) and other smaller Lao groups, namely the Thai Loei (400–500,000), Lao Lom (350,000), Lao Wiang/Klang (200,000), Lao Khrang (90,000), Lao Ngaew (30,000), and Lao Ti (10,000; b) six million Khon Muang (9.9 percent, also called Northern Thais); c) 4.5 million Pak Tai (7.5 percent, also called Southern Thais); d) 1.4 million Khmer Leu (2.3 percent, also called Northern Khmer); e) 900,000 Malay (1.5%); f) 500,000 Ngaw (0.8 percent); g) 470,000 Phu Thai (0.8 percent); h) 400,000 Kuy/Kuay (also known as Suay) (0.7 percent), and i) 350,000 Karen (0.6 percent). Thai Chinese, those of significant Chinese heritage, are 14% of the population, while Thais with partial Chinese ancestry comprise up to 40% of the population. Thai Malays represent 3% of the population, with the remainder consisting of Mon people, Khmers and various \"Hill tribe (Thailand)\". The countrys official language is Thai language and the primary religion is Theravada Buddhism, which is practised by around 95% of the population."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many percent of people were not Thai Chinese?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "86"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The 2011 Thailand Country Report provides population numbers for mountain peoples (hill tribes) and ethnic communities in the Northeast and is explicit about its main reliance on the Mahidol University Ethnolinguistic Maps of Thailand data. Thus, though over 3.288 million people in the Northeast alone could not be categorised, the population and percentages of other ethnic communities circa 1997 are known for all of Thailand and constitute minimum populations. In descending order, the largest (equal to or greater than 400,000) are a) 15,080,000 Lao (24.9 percent) consisting of the Thai Lao (14 million) and other smaller Lao groups, namely the Thai Loei (400–500,000), Lao Lom (350,000), Lao Wiang/Klang (200,000), Lao Khrang (90,000), Lao Ngaew (30,000), and Lao Ti (10,000; b) six million Khon Muang (9.9 percent, also called Northern Thais); c) 4.5 million Pak Tai (7.5 percent, also called Southern Thais); d) 1.4 million Khmer Leu (2.3 percent, also called Northern Khmer); e) 900,000 Malay (1.5%); f) 500,000 Ngaw (0.8 percent); g) 470,000 Phu Thai (0.8 percent); h) 400,000 Kuy/Kuay (also known as Suay) (0.7 percent), and i) 350,000 Karen (0.6 percent). Thai Chinese, those of significant Chinese heritage, are 14% of the population, while Thais with partial Chinese ancestry comprise up to 40% of the population. Thai Malays represent 3% of the population, with the remainder consisting of Mon people, Khmers and various \"Hill tribe (Thailand)\". The countrys official language is Thai language and the primary religion is Theravada Buddhism, which is practised by around 95% of the population."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many percent of people were not Thais with partial Chinese ancestry?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "60"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The 2011 Thailand Country Report provides population numbers for mountain peoples (hill tribes) and ethnic communities in the Northeast and is explicit about its main reliance on the Mahidol University Ethnolinguistic Maps of Thailand data. Thus, though over 3.288 million people in the Northeast alone could not be categorised, the population and percentages of other ethnic communities circa 1997 are known for all of Thailand and constitute minimum populations. In descending order, the largest (equal to or greater than 400,000) are a) 15,080,000 Lao (24.9 percent) consisting of the Thai Lao (14 million) and other smaller Lao groups, namely the Thai Loei (400–500,000), Lao Lom (350,000), Lao Wiang/Klang (200,000), Lao Khrang (90,000), Lao Ngaew (30,000), and Lao Ti (10,000; b) six million Khon Muang (9.9 percent, also called Northern Thais); c) 4.5 million Pak Tai (7.5 percent, also called Southern Thais); d) 1.4 million Khmer Leu (2.3 percent, also called Northern Khmer); e) 900,000 Malay (1.5%); f) 500,000 Ngaw (0.8 percent); g) 470,000 Phu Thai (0.8 percent); h) 400,000 Kuy/Kuay (also known as Suay) (0.7 percent), and i) 350,000 Karen (0.6 percent). Thai Chinese, those of significant Chinese heritage, are 14% of the population, while Thais with partial Chinese ancestry comprise up to 40% of the population. Thai Malays represent 3% of the population, with the remainder consisting of Mon people, Khmers and various \"Hill tribe (Thailand)\". The countrys official language is Thai language and the primary religion is Theravada Buddhism, which is practised by around 95% of the population."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many percent of people were not Thai Malays?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "97"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "With Steigerwalds departure in 1999, Mike Lange shared the broadcast booth with former Penguins defenseman Peter Taglianetti. Taglianetti, a two-time Stanley Cup winner with the team in 1991 and 1992, remained in the position for one season before being replaced by Ed Olczyk. Lange and Olczyk were broadcast partners from 2000 until 2003, when Olczyk left the booth to become the 18th head coach in Penguins history that had become upon due to the firing of previous Head Coach Rick Kehoe after the 2002–03 season. With Olczyks vacancy, the Penguins hired Bob Errey as their new color commentator for the start of the 2003–04 season (a position that he continues to hold as of the start of the 2012–13 season. Lange and Errey remained in the booth until 2005–06. After 26 seasons in the television broadcast booth, Mike Lange was not retained by FSN Pittsburgh. Instead, he was replaced by former broadcast partner Paul Steigerwald, who remained the TV play-by-play broadcaster for the team until the 2016–17 season. Lange returned to the radio broadcast booth and currently holds the position of radio play-by-play announcer, the same position he had held with the team in the mid-1970s. Following the 2016–17 season, Steigerwald moved back to the Penguins front office and NHL Network (U.S. TV network) personality Steve Mears was hired as the new television play-by-play announcer starting with the 2017–18 season."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many years were Lange and Olczyk broadcast partners?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "3"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "With Steigerwalds departure in 1999, Mike Lange shared the broadcast booth with former Penguins defenseman Peter Taglianetti. Taglianetti, a two-time Stanley Cup winner with the team in 1991 and 1992, remained in the position for one season before being replaced by Ed Olczyk. Lange and Olczyk were broadcast partners from 2000 until 2003, when Olczyk left the booth to become the 18th head coach in Penguins history that had become upon due to the firing of previous Head Coach Rick Kehoe after the 2002–03 season. With Olczyks vacancy, the Penguins hired Bob Errey as their new color commentator for the start of the 2003–04 season (a position that he continues to hold as of the start of the 2012–13 season. Lange and Errey remained in the booth until 2005–06. After 26 seasons in the television broadcast booth, Mike Lange was not retained by FSN Pittsburgh. Instead, he was replaced by former broadcast partner Paul Steigerwald, who remained the TV play-by-play broadcaster for the team until the 2016–17 season. Lange returned to the radio broadcast booth and currently holds the position of radio play-by-play announcer, the same position he had held with the team in the mid-1970s. Following the 2016–17 season, Steigerwald moved back to the Penguins front office and NHL Network (U.S. TV network) personality Steve Mears was hired as the new television play-by-play announcer starting with the 2017–18 season."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many years was Bob Errey Mike Lange's broadcast partner?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "2"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "With Steigerwalds departure in 1999, Mike Lange shared the broadcast booth with former Penguins defenseman Peter Taglianetti. Taglianetti, a two-time Stanley Cup winner with the team in 1991 and 1992, remained in the position for one season before being replaced by Ed Olczyk. Lange and Olczyk were broadcast partners from 2000 until 2003, when Olczyk left the booth to become the 18th head coach in Penguins history that had become upon due to the firing of previous Head Coach Rick Kehoe after the 2002–03 season. With Olczyks vacancy, the Penguins hired Bob Errey as their new color commentator for the start of the 2003–04 season (a position that he continues to hold as of the start of the 2012–13 season. Lange and Errey remained in the booth until 2005–06. After 26 seasons in the television broadcast booth, Mike Lange was not retained by FSN Pittsburgh. Instead, he was replaced by former broadcast partner Paul Steigerwald, who remained the TV play-by-play broadcaster for the team until the 2016–17 season. Lange returned to the radio broadcast booth and currently holds the position of radio play-by-play announcer, the same position he had held with the team in the mid-1970s. Following the 2016–17 season, Steigerwald moved back to the Penguins front office and NHL Network (U.S. TV network) personality Steve Mears was hired as the new television play-by-play announcer starting with the 2017–18 season."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Who was play-by-play announcer first, Mears or Lange?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Lange"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "With Steigerwalds departure in 1999, Mike Lange shared the broadcast booth with former Penguins defenseman Peter Taglianetti. Taglianetti, a two-time Stanley Cup winner with the team in 1991 and 1992, remained in the position for one season before being replaced by Ed Olczyk. Lange and Olczyk were broadcast partners from 2000 until 2003, when Olczyk left the booth to become the 18th head coach in Penguins history that had become upon due to the firing of previous Head Coach Rick Kehoe after the 2002–03 season. With Olczyks vacancy, the Penguins hired Bob Errey as their new color commentator for the start of the 2003–04 season (a position that he continues to hold as of the start of the 2012–13 season. Lange and Errey remained in the booth until 2005–06. After 26 seasons in the television broadcast booth, Mike Lange was not retained by FSN Pittsburgh. Instead, he was replaced by former broadcast partner Paul Steigerwald, who remained the TV play-by-play broadcaster for the team until the 2016–17 season. Lange returned to the radio broadcast booth and currently holds the position of radio play-by-play announcer, the same position he had held with the team in the mid-1970s. Following the 2016–17 season, Steigerwald moved back to the Penguins front office and NHL Network (U.S. TV network) personality Steve Mears was hired as the new television play-by-play announcer starting with the 2017–18 season."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many years were Lange and Olczyk broadcast partners?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "3"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "With Steigerwalds departure in 1999, Mike Lange shared the broadcast booth with former Penguins defenseman Peter Taglianetti. Taglianetti, a two-time Stanley Cup winner with the team in 1991 and 1992, remained in the position for one season before being replaced by Ed Olczyk. Lange and Olczyk were broadcast partners from 2000 until 2003, when Olczyk left the booth to become the 18th head coach in Penguins history that had become upon due to the firing of previous Head Coach Rick Kehoe after the 2002–03 season. With Olczyks vacancy, the Penguins hired Bob Errey as their new color commentator for the start of the 2003–04 season (a position that he continues to hold as of the start of the 2012–13 season. Lange and Errey remained in the booth until 2005–06. After 26 seasons in the television broadcast booth, Mike Lange was not retained by FSN Pittsburgh. Instead, he was replaced by former broadcast partner Paul Steigerwald, who remained the TV play-by-play broadcaster for the team until the 2016–17 season. Lange returned to the radio broadcast booth and currently holds the position of radio play-by-play announcer, the same position he had held with the team in the mid-1970s. Following the 2016–17 season, Steigerwald moved back to the Penguins front office and NHL Network (U.S. TV network) personality Steve Mears was hired as the new television play-by-play announcer starting with the 2017–18 season."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many years were Errey and Lange in the broadcast booth together?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "3"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "With Steigerwalds departure in 1999, Mike Lange shared the broadcast booth with former Penguins defenseman Peter Taglianetti. Taglianetti, a two-time Stanley Cup winner with the team in 1991 and 1992, remained in the position for one season before being replaced by Ed Olczyk. Lange and Olczyk were broadcast partners from 2000 until 2003, when Olczyk left the booth to become the 18th head coach in Penguins history that had become upon due to the firing of previous Head Coach Rick Kehoe after the 2002–03 season. With Olczyks vacancy, the Penguins hired Bob Errey as their new color commentator for the start of the 2003–04 season (a position that he continues to hold as of the start of the 2012–13 season. Lange and Errey remained in the booth until 2005–06. After 26 seasons in the television broadcast booth, Mike Lange was not retained by FSN Pittsburgh. Instead, he was replaced by former broadcast partner Paul Steigerwald, who remained the TV play-by-play broadcaster for the team until the 2016–17 season. Lange returned to the radio broadcast booth and currently holds the position of radio play-by-play announcer, the same position he had held with the team in the mid-1970s. Following the 2016–17 season, Steigerwald moved back to the Penguins front office and NHL Network (U.S. TV network) personality Steve Mears was hired as the new television play-by-play announcer starting with the 2017–18 season."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many years was Paul Steigerwald the TV play-by-play broadcaster for the Penguins?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "10"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "With Steigerwalds departure in 1999, Mike Lange shared the broadcast booth with former Penguins defenseman Peter Taglianetti. Taglianetti, a two-time Stanley Cup winner with the team in 1991 and 1992, remained in the position for one season before being replaced by Ed Olczyk. Lange and Olczyk were broadcast partners from 2000 until 2003, when Olczyk left the booth to become the 18th head coach in Penguins history that had become upon due to the firing of previous Head Coach Rick Kehoe after the 2002–03 season. With Olczyks vacancy, the Penguins hired Bob Errey as their new color commentator for the start of the 2003–04 season (a position that he continues to hold as of the start of the 2012–13 season. Lange and Errey remained in the booth until 2005–06. After 26 seasons in the television broadcast booth, Mike Lange was not retained by FSN Pittsburgh. Instead, he was replaced by former broadcast partner Paul Steigerwald, who remained the TV play-by-play broadcaster for the team until the 2016–17 season. Lange returned to the radio broadcast booth and currently holds the position of radio play-by-play announcer, the same position he had held with the team in the mid-1970s. Following the 2016–17 season, Steigerwald moved back to the Penguins front office and NHL Network (U.S. TV network) personality Steve Mears was hired as the new television play-by-play announcer starting with the 2017–18 season."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many years did Lange and Errey remained in the booth to broadcast?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "1"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "With Steigerwalds departure in 1999, Mike Lange shared the broadcast booth with former Penguins defenseman Peter Taglianetti. Taglianetti, a two-time Stanley Cup winner with the team in 1991 and 1992, remained in the position for one season before being replaced by Ed Olczyk. Lange and Olczyk were broadcast partners from 2000 until 2003, when Olczyk left the booth to become the 18th head coach in Penguins history that had become upon due to the firing of previous Head Coach Rick Kehoe after the 2002–03 season. With Olczyks vacancy, the Penguins hired Bob Errey as their new color commentator for the start of the 2003–04 season (a position that he continues to hold as of the start of the 2012–13 season. Lange and Errey remained in the booth until 2005–06. After 26 seasons in the television broadcast booth, Mike Lange was not retained by FSN Pittsburgh. Instead, he was replaced by former broadcast partner Paul Steigerwald, who remained the TV play-by-play broadcaster for the team until the 2016–17 season. Lange returned to the radio broadcast booth and currently holds the position of radio play-by-play announcer, the same position he had held with the team in the mid-1970s. Following the 2016–17 season, Steigerwald moved back to the Penguins front office and NHL Network (U.S. TV network) personality Steve Mears was hired as the new television play-by-play announcer starting with the 2017–18 season."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many year was Lange and Olczyk broadcast partners?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "3"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": " Trying to break a five-game losing streak the Bengals flew to Lucas Oil Stadium for an AFC duel with the Colts. In the first quarter the Bengals had problems when kicker Adam Vinatieri got a 28-yard field goal, followed by QB Carson Palmer's pass being intercepted by CB Kelvin Hayden and returned 31 yards for a touchdown. This was followed in the second quarter by RB Javarris James getting a 3-yard TD run. They eventually scored with kicker Mike Nugent nailing a 27-yard field goal, followed by Palmer finding WR Chad Ochocinco on a 5-yard TD pass. The Bengals fell further behind when Vinatieri made a 47-yard field goal, followed in the fourth quarter by his 23-yard field goal. The Bengals only came back with 1 touchdown when Palmer connected to TE Jermaine Gresham on a 19-yard TD pass. With the loss, Cincinnati fell to 2-7 and surpassed their 2009 loss total."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many players scored touchdowns?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "4"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": " Trying to break a five-game losing streak the Bengals flew to Lucas Oil Stadium for an AFC duel with the Colts. In the first quarter the Bengals had problems when kicker Adam Vinatieri got a 28-yard field goal, followed by QB Carson Palmer's pass being intercepted by CB Kelvin Hayden and returned 31 yards for a touchdown. This was followed in the second quarter by RB Javarris James getting a 3-yard TD run. They eventually scored with kicker Mike Nugent nailing a 27-yard field goal, followed by Palmer finding WR Chad Ochocinco on a 5-yard TD pass. The Bengals fell further behind when Vinatieri made a 47-yard field goal, followed in the fourth quarter by his 23-yard field goal. The Bengals only came back with 1 touchdown when Palmer connected to TE Jermaine Gresham on a 19-yard TD pass. With the loss, Cincinnati fell to 2-7 and surpassed their 2009 loss total."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many yards longer was the longest touchdown pass over the second longest touchdown pass?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "14"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": " Trying to break a five-game losing streak the Bengals flew to Lucas Oil Stadium for an AFC duel with the Colts. In the first quarter the Bengals had problems when kicker Adam Vinatieri got a 28-yard field goal, followed by QB Carson Palmer's pass being intercepted by CB Kelvin Hayden and returned 31 yards for a touchdown. This was followed in the second quarter by RB Javarris James getting a 3-yard TD run. They eventually scored with kicker Mike Nugent nailing a 27-yard field goal, followed by Palmer finding WR Chad Ochocinco on a 5-yard TD pass. The Bengals fell further behind when Vinatieri made a 47-yard field goal, followed in the fourth quarter by his 23-yard field goal. The Bengals only came back with 1 touchdown when Palmer connected to TE Jermaine Gresham on a 19-yard TD pass. With the loss, Cincinnati fell to 2-7 and surpassed their 2009 loss total."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many yards was the longest field goal?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "47"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": " Trying to break a five-game losing streak the Bengals flew to Lucas Oil Stadium for an AFC duel with the Colts. In the first quarter the Bengals had problems when kicker Adam Vinatieri got a 28-yard field goal, followed by QB Carson Palmer's pass being intercepted by CB Kelvin Hayden and returned 31 yards for a touchdown. This was followed in the second quarter by RB Javarris James getting a 3-yard TD run. They eventually scored with kicker Mike Nugent nailing a 27-yard field goal, followed by Palmer finding WR Chad Ochocinco on a 5-yard TD pass. The Bengals fell further behind when Vinatieri made a 47-yard field goal, followed in the fourth quarter by his 23-yard field goal. The Bengals only came back with 1 touchdown when Palmer connected to TE Jermaine Gresham on a 19-yard TD pass. With the loss, Cincinnati fell to 2-7 and surpassed their 2009 loss total."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which kicker had more field goals?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Adam Vinatieri"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": " Trying to break a five-game losing streak the Bengals flew to Lucas Oil Stadium for an AFC duel with the Colts. In the first quarter the Bengals had problems when kicker Adam Vinatieri got a 28-yard field goal, followed by QB Carson Palmer's pass being intercepted by CB Kelvin Hayden and returned 31 yards for a touchdown. This was followed in the second quarter by RB Javarris James getting a 3-yard TD run. They eventually scored with kicker Mike Nugent nailing a 27-yard field goal, followed by Palmer finding WR Chad Ochocinco on a 5-yard TD pass. The Bengals fell further behind when Vinatieri made a 47-yard field goal, followed in the fourth quarter by his 23-yard field goal. The Bengals only came back with 1 touchdown when Palmer connected to TE Jermaine Gresham on a 19-yard TD pass. With the loss, Cincinnati fell to 2-7 and surpassed their 2009 loss total."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many more yards was Vinatieri's second field goal over his first?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "19"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": " Trying to break a five-game losing streak the Bengals flew to Lucas Oil Stadium for an AFC duel with the Colts. In the first quarter the Bengals had problems when kicker Adam Vinatieri got a 28-yard field goal, followed by QB Carson Palmer's pass being intercepted by CB Kelvin Hayden and returned 31 yards for a touchdown. This was followed in the second quarter by RB Javarris James getting a 3-yard TD run. They eventually scored with kicker Mike Nugent nailing a 27-yard field goal, followed by Palmer finding WR Chad Ochocinco on a 5-yard TD pass. The Bengals fell further behind when Vinatieri made a 47-yard field goal, followed in the fourth quarter by his 23-yard field goal. The Bengals only came back with 1 touchdown when Palmer connected to TE Jermaine Gresham on a 19-yard TD pass. With the loss, Cincinnati fell to 2-7 and surpassed their 2009 loss total."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Who caught the longest reception?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Jermaine Gresham"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": " Rivers passed to Royal for the go-ahead touchdown with 38 seconds left in the game to defeat the Baltimore Ravens on the road, 34-33, for their third straight win. The Chargers had trailed the entire game, including 30-20 with 6:13 left and 33-27 with 2:22 to go. Rivers completed 34 of 45 passes for 383 yards and three touchdowns, including two scores to Allen. Rivers was intercepted on the Chargers' first drive of the game, and Baltimore led 10-0 almost eight minutes into the contest. On their next possession, San Diego went 80 yards on 13 plays for their first TD, a 12-yard pass from Rivers to Allen. The Chargers pulled to 16-13 early in the third quarter after a 59-yard pass by Rivers to Floyd set up a 26-yard Novak field goal. On the following drive, a roughing the passer penalty by Weddle led to a TD pass by the Ravens' Joe Flacco for a 23-20 lead. Flacco later scored on a quarterback sneak after a pass interference penalty on Shareece Wright. The Chargers responded with a 77-yard drive, culminating in a 23-yard TD from Rivers to Allen with 3:40 remaining. Jacoby Jones returned the ensuing kickoff 72 yards to the San Diego 30, setting up Justin Tucker's fourth field goal of the game for the Ravens. Rivers then led the 80-yard game-winning drive. After an interference call against Anthony Levine in the end zone, Rivers connected with Royal for a TD. Rivers moved to 20th among NFL leaders in career passing yards, passing Carson Palmer (35,365) and Jim Kelly (35,467). The Chargers had four players—Gates, Allen, Royal, and Floyd—with over 80 yards receiving in the game for the first time in team history. Each team punted only once in the game. It was the Ravens first loss in November since 2009. They had also been 11-0 at home against West Coast teams. The Chargers used their fifth different center of the season, Trevor Robinson, after their fourth center, Chris Watt, left the game with an injury."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which team scored more points, Chargers or Baltimore?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Chargers"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": " Rivers passed to Royal for the go-ahead touchdown with 38 seconds left in the game to defeat the Baltimore Ravens on the road, 34-33, for their third straight win. The Chargers had trailed the entire game, including 30-20 with 6:13 left and 33-27 with 2:22 to go. Rivers completed 34 of 45 passes for 383 yards and three touchdowns, including two scores to Allen. Rivers was intercepted on the Chargers' first drive of the game, and Baltimore led 10-0 almost eight minutes into the contest. On their next possession, San Diego went 80 yards on 13 plays for their first TD, a 12-yard pass from Rivers to Allen. The Chargers pulled to 16-13 early in the third quarter after a 59-yard pass by Rivers to Floyd set up a 26-yard Novak field goal. On the following drive, a roughing the passer penalty by Weddle led to a TD pass by the Ravens' Joe Flacco for a 23-20 lead. Flacco later scored on a quarterback sneak after a pass interference penalty on Shareece Wright. The Chargers responded with a 77-yard drive, culminating in a 23-yard TD from Rivers to Allen with 3:40 remaining. Jacoby Jones returned the ensuing kickoff 72 yards to the San Diego 30, setting up Justin Tucker's fourth field goal of the game for the Ravens. Rivers then led the 80-yard game-winning drive. After an interference call against Anthony Levine in the end zone, Rivers connected with Royal for a TD. Rivers moved to 20th among NFL leaders in career passing yards, passing Carson Palmer (35,365) and Jim Kelly (35,467). The Chargers had four players—Gates, Allen, Royal, and Floyd—with over 80 yards receiving in the game for the first time in team history. Each team punted only once in the game. It was the Ravens first loss in November since 2009. They had also been 11-0 at home against West Coast teams. The Chargers used their fifth different center of the season, Trevor Robinson, after their fourth center, Chris Watt, left the game with an injury."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Who threw the last touchdown of the game?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Rivers"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": " Rivers passed to Royal for the go-ahead touchdown with 38 seconds left in the game to defeat the Baltimore Ravens on the road, 34-33, for their third straight win. The Chargers had trailed the entire game, including 30-20 with 6:13 left and 33-27 with 2:22 to go. Rivers completed 34 of 45 passes for 383 yards and three touchdowns, including two scores to Allen. Rivers was intercepted on the Chargers' first drive of the game, and Baltimore led 10-0 almost eight minutes into the contest. On their next possession, San Diego went 80 yards on 13 plays for their first TD, a 12-yard pass from Rivers to Allen. The Chargers pulled to 16-13 early in the third quarter after a 59-yard pass by Rivers to Floyd set up a 26-yard Novak field goal. On the following drive, a roughing the passer penalty by Weddle led to a TD pass by the Ravens' Joe Flacco for a 23-20 lead. Flacco later scored on a quarterback sneak after a pass interference penalty on Shareece Wright. The Chargers responded with a 77-yard drive, culminating in a 23-yard TD from Rivers to Allen with 3:40 remaining. Jacoby Jones returned the ensuing kickoff 72 yards to the San Diego 30, setting up Justin Tucker's fourth field goal of the game for the Ravens. Rivers then led the 80-yard game-winning drive. After an interference call against Anthony Levine in the end zone, Rivers connected with Royal for a TD. Rivers moved to 20th among NFL leaders in career passing yards, passing Carson Palmer (35,365) and Jim Kelly (35,467). The Chargers had four players—Gates, Allen, Royal, and Floyd—with over 80 yards receiving in the game for the first time in team history. Each team punted only once in the game. It was the Ravens first loss in November since 2009. They had also been 11-0 at home against West Coast teams. The Chargers used their fifth different center of the season, Trevor Robinson, after their fourth center, Chris Watt, left the game with an injury."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which team never trailed by over 7 points in the game?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Ravens"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "For each vintage, the CIVC rated the villages of the area based on the quality of their grapes and vineyards. The rating was then used to determine the price and the percentage of the price that growers get. The Grand Cru rated vineyards received 100 percent rating which entitled the grower to 100% of the price. Premier Crus were vineyards with 90–99% ratings while Deuxième Crus received 80–89% ratings. Under appellation rules, around 4,000 kilograms (8,800 pounds) of grapes can be pressed (wine) to create up to 673 gallons (US) (either 2,550 L or 3,060 L) of juice. The first 541 gallons (either 2,050 L or 2,460 L) are the cuvée and the next 132 gallons (either 500 L or 600 L) are the taille. Prior to 1992, a second taille of 44 gallons (either 167 L or 200 L) was previously allowed. For vintage Champagne, 100% of the grapes must come from that vintage year while non-vintage wine is a blend of vintages. Vintage champagne must spend a minimum of three years of aging. There are no regulations about how long it must spend on its Lees (fermentation), but some of the premier Champagne houses keep their wines on Lees (fermentation) for upwards of five to ten years. Non-vintage Champagne must spend a minimum of 15 months of aging but only a minimum of 12 months on the lees. Most of the Champagne houses keep their wines on the lees through the whole time of aging because it is more expense to bottle the wine then age it and finally shipped."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which vinyards had the highest ratings?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Premier Crus"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "For each vintage, the CIVC rated the villages of the area based on the quality of their grapes and vineyards. The rating was then used to determine the price and the percentage of the price that growers get. The Grand Cru rated vineyards received 100 percent rating which entitled the grower to 100% of the price. Premier Crus were vineyards with 90–99% ratings while Deuxième Crus received 80–89% ratings. Under appellation rules, around 4,000 kilograms (8,800 pounds) of grapes can be pressed (wine) to create up to 673 gallons (US) (either 2,550 L or 3,060 L) of juice. The first 541 gallons (either 2,050 L or 2,460 L) are the cuvée and the next 132 gallons (either 500 L or 600 L) are the taille. Prior to 1992, a second taille of 44 gallons (either 167 L or 200 L) was previously allowed. For vintage Champagne, 100% of the grapes must come from that vintage year while non-vintage wine is a blend of vintages. Vintage champagne must spend a minimum of three years of aging. There are no regulations about how long it must spend on its Lees (fermentation), but some of the premier Champagne houses keep their wines on Lees (fermentation) for upwards of five to ten years. Non-vintage Champagne must spend a minimum of 15 months of aging but only a minimum of 12 months on the lees. Most of the Champagne houses keep their wines on the lees through the whole time of aging because it is more expense to bottle the wine then age it and finally shipped."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many gallons of wine could be taille prior to 1992?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "176"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "For each vintage, the CIVC rated the villages of the area based on the quality of their grapes and vineyards. The rating was then used to determine the price and the percentage of the price that growers get. The Grand Cru rated vineyards received 100 percent rating which entitled the grower to 100% of the price. Premier Crus were vineyards with 90–99% ratings while Deuxième Crus received 80–89% ratings. Under appellation rules, around 4,000 kilograms (8,800 pounds) of grapes can be pressed (wine) to create up to 673 gallons (US) (either 2,550 L or 3,060 L) of juice. The first 541 gallons (either 2,050 L or 2,460 L) are the cuvée and the next 132 gallons (either 500 L or 600 L) are the taille. Prior to 1992, a second taille of 44 gallons (either 167 L or 200 L) was previously allowed. For vintage Champagne, 100% of the grapes must come from that vintage year while non-vintage wine is a blend of vintages. Vintage champagne must spend a minimum of three years of aging. There are no regulations about how long it must spend on its Lees (fermentation), but some of the premier Champagne houses keep their wines on Lees (fermentation) for upwards of five to ten years. Non-vintage Champagne must spend a minimum of 15 months of aging but only a minimum of 12 months on the lees. Most of the Champagne houses keep their wines on the lees through the whole time of aging because it is more expense to bottle the wine then age it and finally shipped."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "What is the taille?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "the next 132 gallons"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "For each vintage, the CIVC rated the villages of the area based on the quality of their grapes and vineyards. The rating was then used to determine the price and the percentage of the price that growers get. The Grand Cru rated vineyards received 100 percent rating which entitled the grower to 100% of the price. Premier Crus were vineyards with 90–99% ratings while Deuxième Crus received 80–89% ratings. Under appellation rules, around 4,000 kilograms (8,800 pounds) of grapes can be pressed (wine) to create up to 673 gallons (US) (either 2,550 L or 3,060 L) of juice. The first 541 gallons (either 2,050 L or 2,460 L) are the cuvée and the next 132 gallons (either 500 L or 600 L) are the taille. Prior to 1992, a second taille of 44 gallons (either 167 L or 200 L) was previously allowed. For vintage Champagne, 100% of the grapes must come from that vintage year while non-vintage wine is a blend of vintages. Vintage champagne must spend a minimum of three years of aging. There are no regulations about how long it must spend on its Lees (fermentation), but some of the premier Champagne houses keep their wines on Lees (fermentation) for upwards of five to ten years. Non-vintage Champagne must spend a minimum of 15 months of aging but only a minimum of 12 months on the lees. Most of the Champagne houses keep their wines on the lees through the whole time of aging because it is more expense to bottle the wine then age it and finally shipped."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Is the cuvée the first 541 gallons or the next 132 gallons of juice?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "the first 541 gallons"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "For each vintage, the CIVC rated the villages of the area based on the quality of their grapes and vineyards. The rating was then used to determine the price and the percentage of the price that growers get. The Grand Cru rated vineyards received 100 percent rating which entitled the grower to 100% of the price. Premier Crus were vineyards with 90–99% ratings while Deuxième Crus received 80–89% ratings. Under appellation rules, around 4,000 kilograms (8,800 pounds) of grapes can be pressed (wine) to create up to 673 gallons (US) (either 2,550 L or 3,060 L) of juice. The first 541 gallons (either 2,050 L or 2,460 L) are the cuvée and the next 132 gallons (either 500 L or 600 L) are the taille. Prior to 1992, a second taille of 44 gallons (either 167 L or 200 L) was previously allowed. For vintage Champagne, 100% of the grapes must come from that vintage year while non-vintage wine is a blend of vintages. Vintage champagne must spend a minimum of three years of aging. There are no regulations about how long it must spend on its Lees (fermentation), but some of the premier Champagne houses keep their wines on Lees (fermentation) for upwards of five to ten years. Non-vintage Champagne must spend a minimum of 15 months of aging but only a minimum of 12 months on the lees. Most of the Champagne houses keep their wines on the lees through the whole time of aging because it is more expense to bottle the wine then age it and finally shipped."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "What requires more than 3 years of aging, vintage champagne or non-vintage champagne?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "vintage champagne"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": " This was the first Sunday Night Football game held in MetLife Stadium following a one-season absence. With the loss, the Giants fell to 3-8, and were mathematically eliminated from playoff contention after the Lions defeated the Bears on Thanksgiving four days later. This game, however, is best known for an acrobatic one-handed catch by Odell Beckham Jr. early in the 2nd quarter that would go down as one of the greatest catches in NFL history. A penalty marker flew as he made the catch - for pass interference on Brandon Carr, who had been covering Beckham on that play."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Why did Brandon Carr receive a penalty?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "pass interference"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "In 1963, hundreds of thousands of people stood ashore by the Nieuwe Maas and the Nieuwe Waterweg to wave two ships, deGroote Beer and the Waterman goodbye. The ships transported thousands of Feijenoord fans to Lisbon where the club faced S.L. Benfica on 8 May 1963 in the European Cup semi-finals. The first leg, held in Rotterdam a month earlier, finished 0–0. Despite Feijenoord eventually losing the match 3–1, this turned out to be the start of the most successful period in the clubs history. Feijenoord won the double for the first time in their history in 1965, and managed to win another double a few years later in 1969. The 1965 title secured Feijenoord a spot in the 1965–66 European Cup, where they faced multiple cup champion Real Madrid C.F. on 8 September 1965. During the match, Hans Kraay had to leave the pitch injured after 31 minutes, without being substituted. He returned at the start of the second half and scored the goal which resulted in a 2–1 win. During the match, fans favourite Coen Moulijn was attacked by a Spanish defender. Moulijn then proceeded to chase the defender down the pitch, leading other players, and even fans who entered the pitch, to do the same. The referee could do nothing but to suspend the match at 2–1 in Feijenoords favour. Two weeks later, Real Madrid comfortably beat Feijenoord 5–0 and eventually won the European Cup that season."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "What month was the start of the most successful period in Feijenoord's history?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "April 1963"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "In 1963, hundreds of thousands of people stood ashore by the Nieuwe Maas and the Nieuwe Waterweg to wave two ships, deGroote Beer and the Waterman goodbye. The ships transported thousands of Feijenoord fans to Lisbon where the club faced S.L. Benfica on 8 May 1963 in the European Cup semi-finals. The first leg, held in Rotterdam a month earlier, finished 0–0. Despite Feijenoord eventually losing the match 3–1, this turned out to be the start of the most successful period in the clubs history. Feijenoord won the double for the first time in their history in 1965, and managed to win another double a few years later in 1969. The 1965 title secured Feijenoord a spot in the 1965–66 European Cup, where they faced multiple cup champion Real Madrid C.F. on 8 September 1965. During the match, Hans Kraay had to leave the pitch injured after 31 minutes, without being substituted. He returned at the start of the second half and scored the goal which resulted in a 2–1 win. During the match, fans favourite Coen Moulijn was attacked by a Spanish defender. Moulijn then proceeded to chase the defender down the pitch, leading other players, and even fans who entered the pitch, to do the same. The referee could do nothing but to suspend the match at 2–1 in Feijenoords favour. Two weeks later, Real Madrid comfortably beat Feijenoord 5–0 and eventually won the European Cup that season."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many doubles did Feijenoord win in the 1960s?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "2"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "In 1963, hundreds of thousands of people stood ashore by the Nieuwe Maas and the Nieuwe Waterweg to wave two ships, deGroote Beer and the Waterman goodbye. The ships transported thousands of Feijenoord fans to Lisbon where the club faced S.L. Benfica on 8 May 1963 in the European Cup semi-finals. The first leg, held in Rotterdam a month earlier, finished 0–0. Despite Feijenoord eventually losing the match 3–1, this turned out to be the start of the most successful period in the clubs history. Feijenoord won the double for the first time in their history in 1965, and managed to win another double a few years later in 1969. The 1965 title secured Feijenoord a spot in the 1965–66 European Cup, where they faced multiple cup champion Real Madrid C.F. on 8 September 1965. During the match, Hans Kraay had to leave the pitch injured after 31 minutes, without being substituted. He returned at the start of the second half and scored the goal which resulted in a 2–1 win. During the match, fans favourite Coen Moulijn was attacked by a Spanish defender. Moulijn then proceeded to chase the defender down the pitch, leading other players, and even fans who entered the pitch, to do the same. The referee could do nothing but to suspend the match at 2–1 in Feijenoords favour. Two weeks later, Real Madrid comfortably beat Feijenoord 5–0 and eventually won the European Cup that season."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Who did Real Madrid beat in the 1965–66 European Cup?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Feijenoord"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The success of the 1981 Irish hunger strike in mobilising support and winning elections led to what was referred to by Danny Morrison (writer) as, \"the Armalite and ballot box strategy\" with more time and resources devoted to political activity. The perceived stalemate along with British governments hints of a compromise and secret approaches in the early 1990s led republican leaders increasingly to look for a political agreement to end the conflict, with a broadening dissociation of Sinn Féin from the IRA. Following negotiations with the Social Democratic and Labour Party (SDLP) and secret talks with British civil servants, the IRA ultimately called a ceasefire in 1994 on the understanding that Sinn Féin would be included in political talks for a settlement. When the British government then demanded the disarmament of the IRA before it allowed Sinn Féin into multiparty talks, the organisation called off its ceasefire in February 1996. The renewed bombings caused severe economic damage, with the 1996 Manchester bombing and the Docklands bombing causing approximately £800 million in combined damage. After the ceasefire was reinstated in July 1997, Sinn Féin was admitted into all-party talks, which produced the Good Friday Agreement of 1998. The IRAs armed campaign, primarily in Northern Ireland but also in England and mainland Europe, caused the deaths of approximately 1,800 people. The dead included around 1,100 members of the British security forces, and about 630 civilians. The IRA itself lost 275–300 members, of an estimated 10,000 total over the 30-year period. Between 1970 and 2005, the IRA had detonated 19,000 improvised explosive devices (IEDs) in the United Kingdom, an average of one every 17 hours for three and a half decades, arguably making it \"the biggest terrorist bombing campaign in history\"."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which happened first, Irish hunger strike or the IRA called a ceasefire?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Irish hunger strike"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The success of the 1981 Irish hunger strike in mobilising support and winning elections led to what was referred to by Danny Morrison (writer) as, \"the Armalite and ballot box strategy\" with more time and resources devoted to political activity. The perceived stalemate along with British governments hints of a compromise and secret approaches in the early 1990s led republican leaders increasingly to look for a political agreement to end the conflict, with a broadening dissociation of Sinn Féin from the IRA. Following negotiations with the Social Democratic and Labour Party (SDLP) and secret talks with British civil servants, the IRA ultimately called a ceasefire in 1994 on the understanding that Sinn Féin would be included in political talks for a settlement. When the British government then demanded the disarmament of the IRA before it allowed Sinn Féin into multiparty talks, the organisation called off its ceasefire in February 1996. The renewed bombings caused severe economic damage, with the 1996 Manchester bombing and the Docklands bombing causing approximately £800 million in combined damage. After the ceasefire was reinstated in July 1997, Sinn Féin was admitted into all-party talks, which produced the Good Friday Agreement of 1998. The IRAs armed campaign, primarily in Northern Ireland but also in England and mainland Europe, caused the deaths of approximately 1,800 people. The dead included around 1,100 members of the British security forces, and about 630 civilians. The IRA itself lost 275–300 members, of an estimated 10,000 total over the 30-year period. Between 1970 and 2005, the IRA had detonated 19,000 improvised explosive devices (IEDs) in the United Kingdom, an average of one every 17 hours for three and a half decades, arguably making it \"the biggest terrorist bombing campaign in history\"."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which happened first, the Good Friday Agreement or the ceasefire was reinstated?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "the ceasefire was reinstated"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The success of the 1981 Irish hunger strike in mobilising support and winning elections led to what was referred to by Danny Morrison (writer) as, \"the Armalite and ballot box strategy\" with more time and resources devoted to political activity. The perceived stalemate along with British governments hints of a compromise and secret approaches in the early 1990s led republican leaders increasingly to look for a political agreement to end the conflict, with a broadening dissociation of Sinn Féin from the IRA. Following negotiations with the Social Democratic and Labour Party (SDLP) and secret talks with British civil servants, the IRA ultimately called a ceasefire in 1994 on the understanding that Sinn Féin would be included in political talks for a settlement. When the British government then demanded the disarmament of the IRA before it allowed Sinn Féin into multiparty talks, the organisation called off its ceasefire in February 1996. The renewed bombings caused severe economic damage, with the 1996 Manchester bombing and the Docklands bombing causing approximately £800 million in combined damage. After the ceasefire was reinstated in July 1997, Sinn Féin was admitted into all-party talks, which produced the Good Friday Agreement of 1998. The IRAs armed campaign, primarily in Northern Ireland but also in England and mainland Europe, caused the deaths of approximately 1,800 people. The dead included around 1,100 members of the British security forces, and about 630 civilians. The IRA itself lost 275–300 members, of an estimated 10,000 total over the 30-year period. Between 1970 and 2005, the IRA had detonated 19,000 improvised explosive devices (IEDs) in the United Kingdom, an average of one every 17 hours for three and a half decades, arguably making it \"the biggest terrorist bombing campaign in history\"."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many more British security forces were killed compared to civilians"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "470"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The success of the 1981 Irish hunger strike in mobilising support and winning elections led to what was referred to by Danny Morrison (writer) as, \"the Armalite and ballot box strategy\" with more time and resources devoted to political activity. The perceived stalemate along with British governments hints of a compromise and secret approaches in the early 1990s led republican leaders increasingly to look for a political agreement to end the conflict, with a broadening dissociation of Sinn Féin from the IRA. Following negotiations with the Social Democratic and Labour Party (SDLP) and secret talks with British civil servants, the IRA ultimately called a ceasefire in 1994 on the understanding that Sinn Féin would be included in political talks for a settlement. When the British government then demanded the disarmament of the IRA before it allowed Sinn Féin into multiparty talks, the organisation called off its ceasefire in February 1996. The renewed bombings caused severe economic damage, with the 1996 Manchester bombing and the Docklands bombing causing approximately £800 million in combined damage. After the ceasefire was reinstated in July 1997, Sinn Féin was admitted into all-party talks, which produced the Good Friday Agreement of 1998. The IRAs armed campaign, primarily in Northern Ireland but also in England and mainland Europe, caused the deaths of approximately 1,800 people. The dead included around 1,100 members of the British security forces, and about 630 civilians. The IRA itself lost 275–300 members, of an estimated 10,000 total over the 30-year period. Between 1970 and 2005, the IRA had detonated 19,000 improvised explosive devices (IEDs) in the United Kingdom, an average of one every 17 hours for three and a half decades, arguably making it \"the biggest terrorist bombing campaign in history\"."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which occurred first, the Irish hunger strike or the Good Friday Agreement?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Irish hunger strike"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The success of the 1981 Irish hunger strike in mobilising support and winning elections led to what was referred to by Danny Morrison (writer) as, \"the Armalite and ballot box strategy\" with more time and resources devoted to political activity. The perceived stalemate along with British governments hints of a compromise and secret approaches in the early 1990s led republican leaders increasingly to look for a political agreement to end the conflict, with a broadening dissociation of Sinn Féin from the IRA. Following negotiations with the Social Democratic and Labour Party (SDLP) and secret talks with British civil servants, the IRA ultimately called a ceasefire in 1994 on the understanding that Sinn Féin would be included in political talks for a settlement. When the British government then demanded the disarmament of the IRA before it allowed Sinn Féin into multiparty talks, the organisation called off its ceasefire in February 1996. The renewed bombings caused severe economic damage, with the 1996 Manchester bombing and the Docklands bombing causing approximately £800 million in combined damage. After the ceasefire was reinstated in July 1997, Sinn Féin was admitted into all-party talks, which produced the Good Friday Agreement of 1998. The IRAs armed campaign, primarily in Northern Ireland but also in England and mainland Europe, caused the deaths of approximately 1,800 people. The dead included around 1,100 members of the British security forces, and about 630 civilians. The IRA itself lost 275–300 members, of an estimated 10,000 total over the 30-year period. Between 1970 and 2005, the IRA had detonated 19,000 improvised explosive devices (IEDs) in the United Kingdom, an average of one every 17 hours for three and a half decades, arguably making it \"the biggest terrorist bombing campaign in history\"."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many, on average, were improvised explosive devices detonated per week?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "10"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The success of the 1981 Irish hunger strike in mobilising support and winning elections led to what was referred to by Danny Morrison (writer) as, \"the Armalite and ballot box strategy\" with more time and resources devoted to political activity. The perceived stalemate along with British governments hints of a compromise and secret approaches in the early 1990s led republican leaders increasingly to look for a political agreement to end the conflict, with a broadening dissociation of Sinn Féin from the IRA. Following negotiations with the Social Democratic and Labour Party (SDLP) and secret talks with British civil servants, the IRA ultimately called a ceasefire in 1994 on the understanding that Sinn Féin would be included in political talks for a settlement. When the British government then demanded the disarmament of the IRA before it allowed Sinn Féin into multiparty talks, the organisation called off its ceasefire in February 1996. The renewed bombings caused severe economic damage, with the 1996 Manchester bombing and the Docklands bombing causing approximately £800 million in combined damage. After the ceasefire was reinstated in July 1997, Sinn Féin was admitted into all-party talks, which produced the Good Friday Agreement of 1998. The IRAs armed campaign, primarily in Northern Ireland but also in England and mainland Europe, caused the deaths of approximately 1,800 people. The dead included around 1,100 members of the British security forces, and about 630 civilians. The IRA itself lost 275–300 members, of an estimated 10,000 total over the 30-year period. Between 1970 and 2005, the IRA had detonated 19,000 improvised explosive devices (IEDs) in the United Kingdom, an average of one every 17 hours for three and a half decades, arguably making it \"the biggest terrorist bombing campaign in history\"."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many years after the IRA ultimately called a ceasefire was the Good Friday Agreement produced?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "4"
}
]
|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "The success of the 1981 Irish hunger strike in mobilising support and winning elections led to what was referred to by Danny Morrison (writer) as, \"the Armalite and ballot box strategy\" with more time and resources devoted to political activity. The perceived stalemate along with British governments hints of a compromise and secret approaches in the early 1990s led republican leaders increasingly to look for a political agreement to end the conflict, with a broadening dissociation of Sinn Féin from the IRA. Following negotiations with the Social Democratic and Labour Party (SDLP) and secret talks with British civil servants, the IRA ultimately called a ceasefire in 1994 on the understanding that Sinn Féin would be included in political talks for a settlement. When the British government then demanded the disarmament of the IRA before it allowed Sinn Féin into multiparty talks, the organisation called off its ceasefire in February 1996. The renewed bombings caused severe economic damage, with the 1996 Manchester bombing and the Docklands bombing causing approximately £800 million in combined damage. After the ceasefire was reinstated in July 1997, Sinn Féin was admitted into all-party talks, which produced the Good Friday Agreement of 1998. The IRAs armed campaign, primarily in Northern Ireland but also in England and mainland Europe, caused the deaths of approximately 1,800 people. The dead included around 1,100 members of the British security forces, and about 630 civilians. The IRA itself lost 275–300 members, of an estimated 10,000 total over the 30-year period. Between 1970 and 2005, the IRA had detonated 19,000 improvised explosive devices (IEDs) in the United Kingdom, an average of one every 17 hours for three and a half decades, arguably making it \"the biggest terrorist bombing campaign in history\"."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Who had the largest amount of deaths in the IRA armed campaign: British Campaign forces or civilians?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "British"
}
]
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.