messages
listlengths
4
4
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "In the same year, for the City of Los Angeles, of the 1,721,778 workers aged 16 or older, 63.3% commuted to work driving alone, 11.5% commuted by driving in a carpool, 11.0% commuted by public transportation, and 3.4% walked. The percentage of population using public transport in Los Angeles is lower than other large U.S. cities such as Chicago and New York City, but similar to or higher than other western U.S. cities such as Portland, Oregon and Denver, CO. 63.8% of public transportation commuters in the City of Los Angeles in 2006 were non-white, 75.1% were Hispanic and 73.9% were foreign born. 79.4% of public transportation commuters earned less than $25,000 and 37.6% had no vehicle available to them for their commute." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many percent of users of public transportation had another vehicle available to them?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "62.4" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "The ratings increased in 2010, thanks to the \"Who Killed Archie?\" storyline and second wedding of Ricky Butcher and Bianca Jackson, and the shows first EastEnders Live on 19 February 2010. The live-episode averaged 15.6 million viewers, peaking at 16.6 million in the final five minutes of broadcast. In January 2010, the average audience was higher than that of Coronation Street for the first time in three years. During the 30th anniversary week in which there were live elements and the climax of the Who Killed Lucy Beale? storyline, 10.84 million viewers tuned in for the 30th anniversary episode itself in an hour long special on 19 February 2015 (peaking with 11.9 million). Later on in the same evening, a special flashback episode averaged 10.3 million viewers, and peaked with 11.2 million. The following day, the anniversary week was rounded off with another fully live episode (the second after 2010) with 9.97 million viewers watching the aftermath of the reveal, the Beale family finding out the truth of Lucys killer and deciding to keep it a secret." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many more millions of people watched the final five minutes of the broadcast compared to the average viewers throughout the show?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "1" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "The ratings increased in 2010, thanks to the \"Who Killed Archie?\" storyline and second wedding of Ricky Butcher and Bianca Jackson, and the shows first EastEnders Live on 19 February 2010. The live-episode averaged 15.6 million viewers, peaking at 16.6 million in the final five minutes of broadcast. In January 2010, the average audience was higher than that of Coronation Street for the first time in three years. During the 30th anniversary week in which there were live elements and the climax of the Who Killed Lucy Beale? storyline, 10.84 million viewers tuned in for the 30th anniversary episode itself in an hour long special on 19 February 2015 (peaking with 11.9 million). Later on in the same evening, a special flashback episode averaged 10.3 million viewers, and peaked with 11.2 million. The following day, the anniversary week was rounded off with another fully live episode (the second after 2010) with 9.97 million viewers watching the aftermath of the reveal, the Beale family finding out the truth of Lucys killer and deciding to keep it a secret." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Which show had less viewers in January of 2010, EastEnders or Coronation Street?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "Coronation Street" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "The ratings increased in 2010, thanks to the \"Who Killed Archie?\" storyline and second wedding of Ricky Butcher and Bianca Jackson, and the shows first EastEnders Live on 19 February 2010. The live-episode averaged 15.6 million viewers, peaking at 16.6 million in the final five minutes of broadcast. In January 2010, the average audience was higher than that of Coronation Street for the first time in three years. During the 30th anniversary week in which there were live elements and the climax of the Who Killed Lucy Beale? storyline, 10.84 million viewers tuned in for the 30th anniversary episode itself in an hour long special on 19 February 2015 (peaking with 11.9 million). Later on in the same evening, a special flashback episode averaged 10.3 million viewers, and peaked with 11.2 million. The following day, the anniversary week was rounded off with another fully live episode (the second after 2010) with 9.97 million viewers watching the aftermath of the reveal, the Beale family finding out the truth of Lucys killer and deciding to keep it a secret." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many millions of viewers difference was there between the average watchers and the peaked amount of watchers?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": ".9" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "The ratings increased in 2010, thanks to the \"Who Killed Archie?\" storyline and second wedding of Ricky Butcher and Bianca Jackson, and the shows first EastEnders Live on 19 February 2010. The live-episode averaged 15.6 million viewers, peaking at 16.6 million in the final five minutes of broadcast. In January 2010, the average audience was higher than that of Coronation Street for the first time in three years. During the 30th anniversary week in which there were live elements and the climax of the Who Killed Lucy Beale? storyline, 10.84 million viewers tuned in for the 30th anniversary episode itself in an hour long special on 19 February 2015 (peaking with 11.9 million). Later on in the same evening, a special flashback episode averaged 10.3 million viewers, and peaked with 11.2 million. The following day, the anniversary week was rounded off with another fully live episode (the second after 2010) with 9.97 million viewers watching the aftermath of the reveal, the Beale family finding out the truth of Lucys killer and deciding to keep it a secret." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Which were there more viewers for, the first EastEnders Live or the 30th anniversary episode?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "first EastEnders Live" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "The ratings increased in 2010, thanks to the \"Who Killed Archie?\" storyline and second wedding of Ricky Butcher and Bianca Jackson, and the shows first EastEnders Live on 19 February 2010. The live-episode averaged 15.6 million viewers, peaking at 16.6 million in the final five minutes of broadcast. In January 2010, the average audience was higher than that of Coronation Street for the first time in three years. During the 30th anniversary week in which there were live elements and the climax of the Who Killed Lucy Beale? storyline, 10.84 million viewers tuned in for the 30th anniversary episode itself in an hour long special on 19 February 2015 (peaking with 11.9 million). Later on in the same evening, a special flashback episode averaged 10.3 million viewers, and peaked with 11.2 million. The following day, the anniversary week was rounded off with another fully live episode (the second after 2010) with 9.97 million viewers watching the aftermath of the reveal, the Beale family finding out the truth of Lucys killer and deciding to keep it a secret." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many years after the first EastEnders Live was the shows 30th anniversary?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "5" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "The ratings increased in 2010, thanks to the \"Who Killed Archie?\" storyline and second wedding of Ricky Butcher and Bianca Jackson, and the shows first EastEnders Live on 19 February 2010. The live-episode averaged 15.6 million viewers, peaking at 16.6 million in the final five minutes of broadcast. In January 2010, the average audience was higher than that of Coronation Street for the first time in three years. During the 30th anniversary week in which there were live elements and the climax of the Who Killed Lucy Beale? storyline, 10.84 million viewers tuned in for the 30th anniversary episode itself in an hour long special on 19 February 2015 (peaking with 11.9 million). Later on in the same evening, a special flashback episode averaged 10.3 million viewers, and peaked with 11.2 million. The following day, the anniversary week was rounded off with another fully live episode (the second after 2010) with 9.97 million viewers watching the aftermath of the reveal, the Beale family finding out the truth of Lucys killer and deciding to keep it a secret." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Which were there more viewers for, the 30th anniversary episode or the special flashback episode?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "30th anniversary episode" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "The ratings increased in 2010, thanks to the \"Who Killed Archie?\" storyline and second wedding of Ricky Butcher and Bianca Jackson, and the shows first EastEnders Live on 19 February 2010. The live-episode averaged 15.6 million viewers, peaking at 16.6 million in the final five minutes of broadcast. In January 2010, the average audience was higher than that of Coronation Street for the first time in three years. During the 30th anniversary week in which there were live elements and the climax of the Who Killed Lucy Beale? storyline, 10.84 million viewers tuned in for the 30th anniversary episode itself in an hour long special on 19 February 2015 (peaking with 11.9 million). Later on in the same evening, a special flashback episode averaged 10.3 million viewers, and peaked with 11.2 million. The following day, the anniversary week was rounded off with another fully live episode (the second after 2010) with 9.97 million viewers watching the aftermath of the reveal, the Beale family finding out the truth of Lucys killer and deciding to keep it a secret." }, { "role": "user", "content": "What day was the second live episode aired?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "20 February 2015" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "The ratings increased in 2010, thanks to the \"Who Killed Archie?\" storyline and second wedding of Ricky Butcher and Bianca Jackson, and the shows first EastEnders Live on 19 February 2010. The live-episode averaged 15.6 million viewers, peaking at 16.6 million in the final five minutes of broadcast. In January 2010, the average audience was higher than that of Coronation Street for the first time in three years. During the 30th anniversary week in which there were live elements and the climax of the Who Killed Lucy Beale? storyline, 10.84 million viewers tuned in for the 30th anniversary episode itself in an hour long special on 19 February 2015 (peaking with 11.9 million). Later on in the same evening, a special flashback episode averaged 10.3 million viewers, and peaked with 11.2 million. The following day, the anniversary week was rounded off with another fully live episode (the second after 2010) with 9.97 million viewers watching the aftermath of the reveal, the Beale family finding out the truth of Lucys killer and deciding to keep it a secret." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many episodes aired during anniversary week?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "3" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "The ratings increased in 2010, thanks to the \"Who Killed Archie?\" storyline and second wedding of Ricky Butcher and Bianca Jackson, and the shows first EastEnders Live on 19 February 2010. The live-episode averaged 15.6 million viewers, peaking at 16.6 million in the final five minutes of broadcast. In January 2010, the average audience was higher than that of Coronation Street for the first time in three years. During the 30th anniversary week in which there were live elements and the climax of the Who Killed Lucy Beale? storyline, 10.84 million viewers tuned in for the 30th anniversary episode itself in an hour long special on 19 February 2015 (peaking with 11.9 million). Later on in the same evening, a special flashback episode averaged 10.3 million viewers, and peaked with 11.2 million. The following day, the anniversary week was rounded off with another fully live episode (the second after 2010) with 9.97 million viewers watching the aftermath of the reveal, the Beale family finding out the truth of Lucys killer and deciding to keep it a secret." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many more millions watched the show \"Who Killed Archie?\" in the final last minutes than in a average show?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "1" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "The ratings increased in 2010, thanks to the \"Who Killed Archie?\" storyline and second wedding of Ricky Butcher and Bianca Jackson, and the shows first EastEnders Live on 19 February 2010. The live-episode averaged 15.6 million viewers, peaking at 16.6 million in the final five minutes of broadcast. In January 2010, the average audience was higher than that of Coronation Street for the first time in three years. During the 30th anniversary week in which there were live elements and the climax of the Who Killed Lucy Beale? storyline, 10.84 million viewers tuned in for the 30th anniversary episode itself in an hour long special on 19 February 2015 (peaking with 11.9 million). Later on in the same evening, a special flashback episode averaged 10.3 million viewers, and peaked with 11.2 million. The following day, the anniversary week was rounded off with another fully live episode (the second after 2010) with 9.97 million viewers watching the aftermath of the reveal, the Beale family finding out the truth of Lucys killer and deciding to keep it a secret." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many more millions did the show peak on \"Who Killed Lucy Beale\" in 2015?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "1.06" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "The ratings increased in 2010, thanks to the \"Who Killed Archie?\" storyline and second wedding of Ricky Butcher and Bianca Jackson, and the shows first EastEnders Live on 19 February 2010. The live-episode averaged 15.6 million viewers, peaking at 16.6 million in the final five minutes of broadcast. In January 2010, the average audience was higher than that of Coronation Street for the first time in three years. During the 30th anniversary week in which there were live elements and the climax of the Who Killed Lucy Beale? storyline, 10.84 million viewers tuned in for the 30th anniversary episode itself in an hour long special on 19 February 2015 (peaking with 11.9 million). Later on in the same evening, a special flashback episode averaged 10.3 million viewers, and peaked with 11.2 million. The following day, the anniversary week was rounded off with another fully live episode (the second after 2010) with 9.97 million viewers watching the aftermath of the reveal, the Beale family finding out the truth of Lucys killer and deciding to keep it a secret." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many more millions of people watched Lucy Beale flashback during the peak than on average?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "0.9" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "As a result of these factors, many investors were eager to invest, at any valuation, in any dot-com company, especially if it had one of the Internet-related prefixes or a \".com\" suffix in its name. Venture capital was easy to raise. Investment banks, which profited significantly from initial public offerings (IPO), fueled speculation and encouraged investment in technology. A combination of rapidly increasing stock prices in the quaternary sector of the economy and confidence that the companies would turn future profits created an environment in which many investors were willing to overlook traditional metrics, such as the price–earnings ratio, and base confidence on technological advancements, leading to a stock market bubble. Between 1995 and 2000, the Nasdaq Composite stock market index rose 400%. It reached a price–earnings ratio of 200, dwarfing the peak price–earnings ratio of 80 for the Japanese Nikkei 225 during the Japanese asset price bubble of 1991. In 1999, shares of Qualcomm rose in value by 2,619%, 12 other large-cap stocks each rose over 1,000% value, and 7 additional large-cap stocks each rose over 900% in value. Even though the Nasdaq Composite rose 85.6% and the S&P 500 Index rose 19.5% in 1999, more stocks fell in value than rose in value as investors sold stocks in slower growing companies to invest in Internet stocks." }, { "role": "user", "content": "What rose higher in 1999, the composite or the S&P 500 index?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "composite" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "As a result of these factors, many investors were eager to invest, at any valuation, in any dot-com company, especially if it had one of the Internet-related prefixes or a \".com\" suffix in its name. Venture capital was easy to raise. Investment banks, which profited significantly from initial public offerings (IPO), fueled speculation and encouraged investment in technology. A combination of rapidly increasing stock prices in the quaternary sector of the economy and confidence that the companies would turn future profits created an environment in which many investors were willing to overlook traditional metrics, such as the price–earnings ratio, and base confidence on technological advancements, leading to a stock market bubble. Between 1995 and 2000, the Nasdaq Composite stock market index rose 400%. It reached a price–earnings ratio of 200, dwarfing the peak price–earnings ratio of 80 for the Japanese Nikkei 225 during the Japanese asset price bubble of 1991. In 1999, shares of Qualcomm rose in value by 2,619%, 12 other large-cap stocks each rose over 1,000% value, and 7 additional large-cap stocks each rose over 900% in value. Even though the Nasdaq Composite rose 85.6% and the S&P 500 Index rose 19.5% in 1999, more stocks fell in value than rose in value as investors sold stocks in slower growing companies to invest in Internet stocks." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many more percentage did the Composite rise than the S&P?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "66.1" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "As a result of these factors, many investors were eager to invest, at any valuation, in any dot-com company, especially if it had one of the Internet-related prefixes or a \".com\" suffix in its name. Venture capital was easy to raise. Investment banks, which profited significantly from initial public offerings (IPO), fueled speculation and encouraged investment in technology. A combination of rapidly increasing stock prices in the quaternary sector of the economy and confidence that the companies would turn future profits created an environment in which many investors were willing to overlook traditional metrics, such as the price–earnings ratio, and base confidence on technological advancements, leading to a stock market bubble. Between 1995 and 2000, the Nasdaq Composite stock market index rose 400%. It reached a price–earnings ratio of 200, dwarfing the peak price–earnings ratio of 80 for the Japanese Nikkei 225 during the Japanese asset price bubble of 1991. In 1999, shares of Qualcomm rose in value by 2,619%, 12 other large-cap stocks each rose over 1,000% value, and 7 additional large-cap stocks each rose over 900% in value. Even though the Nasdaq Composite rose 85.6% and the S&P 500 Index rose 19.5% in 1999, more stocks fell in value than rose in value as investors sold stocks in slower growing companies to invest in Internet stocks." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Which shares rose the least: Qualcomm or 12 other large-cap stocks?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "large-cap stocks" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "As a result of these factors, many investors were eager to invest, at any valuation, in any dot-com company, especially if it had one of the Internet-related prefixes or a \".com\" suffix in its name. Venture capital was easy to raise. Investment banks, which profited significantly from initial public offerings (IPO), fueled speculation and encouraged investment in technology. A combination of rapidly increasing stock prices in the quaternary sector of the economy and confidence that the companies would turn future profits created an environment in which many investors were willing to overlook traditional metrics, such as the price–earnings ratio, and base confidence on technological advancements, leading to a stock market bubble. Between 1995 and 2000, the Nasdaq Composite stock market index rose 400%. It reached a price–earnings ratio of 200, dwarfing the peak price–earnings ratio of 80 for the Japanese Nikkei 225 during the Japanese asset price bubble of 1991. In 1999, shares of Qualcomm rose in value by 2,619%, 12 other large-cap stocks each rose over 1,000% value, and 7 additional large-cap stocks each rose over 900% in value. Even though the Nasdaq Composite rose 85.6% and the S&P 500 Index rose 19.5% in 1999, more stocks fell in value than rose in value as investors sold stocks in slower growing companies to invest in Internet stocks." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many more percentage did Qualcomm rise than Nasdaq?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "2533.4" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "The Cochrane Library had 145 CAM-related Cochrane systematic reviews and 340 non-Cochrane systematic reviews. An analysis of the conclusions of only the 145 Cochrane reviews was done by two readers. In 83% of the cases, the readers agreed. In the 17% in which they disagreed, a third reader agreed with one of the initial readers to set a rating. These studies found that, for CAM, 38.4% concluded positive effect or possibly positive (12.4%), 4.8% concluded no effect, 0.7% concluded harmful effect, and 56.6% concluded insufficient evidence. An assessment of conventional treatments found that 41.3% concluded positive or possibly positive effect, 20% concluded no effect, 8.1% concluded net harmful effects, and 21.3% concluded insufficient evidence. However, the CAM review used the more developed 2004 Cochrane database, while the conventional review used the initial 1998 Cochrane database." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many percentage points represents the chance of neither positive or negative effect from conventional treatments?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "28.1" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "The Cochrane Library had 145 CAM-related Cochrane systematic reviews and 340 non-Cochrane systematic reviews. An analysis of the conclusions of only the 145 Cochrane reviews was done by two readers. In 83% of the cases, the readers agreed. In the 17% in which they disagreed, a third reader agreed with one of the initial readers to set a rating. These studies found that, for CAM, 38.4% concluded positive effect or possibly positive (12.4%), 4.8% concluded no effect, 0.7% concluded harmful effect, and 56.6% concluded insufficient evidence. An assessment of conventional treatments found that 41.3% concluded positive or possibly positive effect, 20% concluded no effect, 8.1% concluded net harmful effects, and 21.3% concluded insufficient evidence. However, the CAM review used the more developed 2004 Cochrane database, while the conventional review used the initial 1998 Cochrane database." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many percent of studies for CAM did not show a positive effect?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "61.6" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "The Cochrane Library had 145 CAM-related Cochrane systematic reviews and 340 non-Cochrane systematic reviews. An analysis of the conclusions of only the 145 Cochrane reviews was done by two readers. In 83% of the cases, the readers agreed. In the 17% in which they disagreed, a third reader agreed with one of the initial readers to set a rating. These studies found that, for CAM, 38.4% concluded positive effect or possibly positive (12.4%), 4.8% concluded no effect, 0.7% concluded harmful effect, and 56.6% concluded insufficient evidence. An assessment of conventional treatments found that 41.3% concluded positive or possibly positive effect, 20% concluded no effect, 8.1% concluded net harmful effects, and 21.3% concluded insufficient evidence. However, the CAM review used the more developed 2004 Cochrane database, while the conventional review used the initial 1998 Cochrane database." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many percent of readers did not agree?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "17" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "The Cochrane Library had 145 CAM-related Cochrane systematic reviews and 340 non-Cochrane systematic reviews. An analysis of the conclusions of only the 145 Cochrane reviews was done by two readers. In 83% of the cases, the readers agreed. In the 17% in which they disagreed, a third reader agreed with one of the initial readers to set a rating. These studies found that, for CAM, 38.4% concluded positive effect or possibly positive (12.4%), 4.8% concluded no effect, 0.7% concluded harmful effect, and 56.6% concluded insufficient evidence. An assessment of conventional treatments found that 41.3% concluded positive or possibly positive effect, 20% concluded no effect, 8.1% concluded net harmful effects, and 21.3% concluded insufficient evidence. However, the CAM review used the more developed 2004 Cochrane database, while the conventional review used the initial 1998 Cochrane database." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many percent of readers did not disagree?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "83" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "The Cochrane Library had 145 CAM-related Cochrane systematic reviews and 340 non-Cochrane systematic reviews. An analysis of the conclusions of only the 145 Cochrane reviews was done by two readers. In 83% of the cases, the readers agreed. In the 17% in which they disagreed, a third reader agreed with one of the initial readers to set a rating. These studies found that, for CAM, 38.4% concluded positive effect or possibly positive (12.4%), 4.8% concluded no effect, 0.7% concluded harmful effect, and 56.6% concluded insufficient evidence. An assessment of conventional treatments found that 41.3% concluded positive or possibly positive effect, 20% concluded no effect, 8.1% concluded net harmful effects, and 21.3% concluded insufficient evidence. However, the CAM review used the more developed 2004 Cochrane database, while the conventional review used the initial 1998 Cochrane database." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many percent of readers did not conclude positive effect?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "61.6" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "The Cochrane Library had 145 CAM-related Cochrane systematic reviews and 340 non-Cochrane systematic reviews. An analysis of the conclusions of only the 145 Cochrane reviews was done by two readers. In 83% of the cases, the readers agreed. In the 17% in which they disagreed, a third reader agreed with one of the initial readers to set a rating. These studies found that, for CAM, 38.4% concluded positive effect or possibly positive (12.4%), 4.8% concluded no effect, 0.7% concluded harmful effect, and 56.6% concluded insufficient evidence. An assessment of conventional treatments found that 41.3% concluded positive or possibly positive effect, 20% concluded no effect, 8.1% concluded net harmful effects, and 21.3% concluded insufficient evidence. However, the CAM review used the more developed 2004 Cochrane database, while the conventional review used the initial 1998 Cochrane database." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many percent of readers did not conclude possibly positive effect?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "87.6" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "The Cochrane Library had 145 CAM-related Cochrane systematic reviews and 340 non-Cochrane systematic reviews. An analysis of the conclusions of only the 145 Cochrane reviews was done by two readers. In 83% of the cases, the readers agreed. In the 17% in which they disagreed, a third reader agreed with one of the initial readers to set a rating. These studies found that, for CAM, 38.4% concluded positive effect or possibly positive (12.4%), 4.8% concluded no effect, 0.7% concluded harmful effect, and 56.6% concluded insufficient evidence. An assessment of conventional treatments found that 41.3% concluded positive or possibly positive effect, 20% concluded no effect, 8.1% concluded net harmful effects, and 21.3% concluded insufficient evidence. However, the CAM review used the more developed 2004 Cochrane database, while the conventional review used the initial 1998 Cochrane database." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many percent of readers did not conclude no effect?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "95.2" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "The Cochrane Library had 145 CAM-related Cochrane systematic reviews and 340 non-Cochrane systematic reviews. An analysis of the conclusions of only the 145 Cochrane reviews was done by two readers. In 83% of the cases, the readers agreed. In the 17% in which they disagreed, a third reader agreed with one of the initial readers to set a rating. These studies found that, for CAM, 38.4% concluded positive effect or possibly positive (12.4%), 4.8% concluded no effect, 0.7% concluded harmful effect, and 56.6% concluded insufficient evidence. An assessment of conventional treatments found that 41.3% concluded positive or possibly positive effect, 20% concluded no effect, 8.1% concluded net harmful effects, and 21.3% concluded insufficient evidence. However, the CAM review used the more developed 2004 Cochrane database, while the conventional review used the initial 1998 Cochrane database." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many percent of readers did not conclude harmful effect?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "99.3" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "The Cochrane Library had 145 CAM-related Cochrane systematic reviews and 340 non-Cochrane systematic reviews. An analysis of the conclusions of only the 145 Cochrane reviews was done by two readers. In 83% of the cases, the readers agreed. In the 17% in which they disagreed, a third reader agreed with one of the initial readers to set a rating. These studies found that, for CAM, 38.4% concluded positive effect or possibly positive (12.4%), 4.8% concluded no effect, 0.7% concluded harmful effect, and 56.6% concluded insufficient evidence. An assessment of conventional treatments found that 41.3% concluded positive or possibly positive effect, 20% concluded no effect, 8.1% concluded net harmful effects, and 21.3% concluded insufficient evidence. However, the CAM review used the more developed 2004 Cochrane database, while the conventional review used the initial 1998 Cochrane database." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many percent of readers did not conclude insufficient evidence?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "43.4" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "The Cochrane Library had 145 CAM-related Cochrane systematic reviews and 340 non-Cochrane systematic reviews. An analysis of the conclusions of only the 145 Cochrane reviews was done by two readers. In 83% of the cases, the readers agreed. In the 17% in which they disagreed, a third reader agreed with one of the initial readers to set a rating. These studies found that, for CAM, 38.4% concluded positive effect or possibly positive (12.4%), 4.8% concluded no effect, 0.7% concluded harmful effect, and 56.6% concluded insufficient evidence. An assessment of conventional treatments found that 41.3% concluded positive or possibly positive effect, 20% concluded no effect, 8.1% concluded net harmful effects, and 21.3% concluded insufficient evidence. However, the CAM review used the more developed 2004 Cochrane database, while the conventional review used the initial 1998 Cochrane database." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many percent of people did not conclude positive effect, when assessing conventional treatments?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "58.7" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "The Cochrane Library had 145 CAM-related Cochrane systematic reviews and 340 non-Cochrane systematic reviews. An analysis of the conclusions of only the 145 Cochrane reviews was done by two readers. In 83% of the cases, the readers agreed. In the 17% in which they disagreed, a third reader agreed with one of the initial readers to set a rating. These studies found that, for CAM, 38.4% concluded positive effect or possibly positive (12.4%), 4.8% concluded no effect, 0.7% concluded harmful effect, and 56.6% concluded insufficient evidence. An assessment of conventional treatments found that 41.3% concluded positive or possibly positive effect, 20% concluded no effect, 8.1% concluded net harmful effects, and 21.3% concluded insufficient evidence. However, the CAM review used the more developed 2004 Cochrane database, while the conventional review used the initial 1998 Cochrane database." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many percent of people did not conclude no effect, when assessing conventional treatments?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "80" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "The Cochrane Library had 145 CAM-related Cochrane systematic reviews and 340 non-Cochrane systematic reviews. An analysis of the conclusions of only the 145 Cochrane reviews was done by two readers. In 83% of the cases, the readers agreed. In the 17% in which they disagreed, a third reader agreed with one of the initial readers to set a rating. These studies found that, for CAM, 38.4% concluded positive effect or possibly positive (12.4%), 4.8% concluded no effect, 0.7% concluded harmful effect, and 56.6% concluded insufficient evidence. An assessment of conventional treatments found that 41.3% concluded positive or possibly positive effect, 20% concluded no effect, 8.1% concluded net harmful effects, and 21.3% concluded insufficient evidence. However, the CAM review used the more developed 2004 Cochrane database, while the conventional review used the initial 1998 Cochrane database." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Which review used the 1998 Cochrane database, the CAM review or the conventional review?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "conventional review" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Early in the 1981-82 Los Angeles Lakers season, Johnson complained to the media about head coach Paul Westhead and demanded a trade. Westhead was fired shortly after Johnsons criticisms, and although Lakers owner Jerry Buss stated that Johnsons comments did not factor into the decision, Johnson was vilified by the national media and booed both on the road and at home. Buss promoted assistant coach Pat Riley to \"co-head coach\" with Jerry West (although West considered himself Rileys assistant) on November 19 and the team won 17 of its next 20 games. Nicknamed \"Showtime (basketball)\" due to the teams new Johnson-led fast break-offense, the Lakers won the Pacific Division title and swept both the 1981-82 Phoenix Suns season and 1981-82 San Antonio Spurs season in the 1982 NBA Playoffs. Los Angeles stretched its postseason winning streak to nine games by taking the first contest of the 1982 NBA Finals from the 1981-82 Philadelphia 76ers season. The team won the Finals 4-2 to finish a 12-2 playoff run. On draft night in 1982 NBA draft, the Lakers had the first overall pick (the result of a trade with Cleveland midway through the 1979-80 season, when the Lakers had sent Don Ford and a 1980 first-round pick to the Cavaliers for Butch Lee and their 1982 selection) and selected James Worthy from North Carolina Tar Heels mens basketball. The 1982-83 Los Angeles Lakers season won the Pacific Division at 58-24, but Worthy suffered a leg injury in the last week of the season and missed the rest of the season. Nevertheless, they advanced to play 1982-83 Philadelphia 76ers season in the 1983 NBA Finals after defeating 1982-83 Portland Trail Blazers season and 1982-83 San Antonio Spurs season. The Sixers, however, won the series and the championship in four games. After the season West replaced Sharman as the teams GM." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Which team did the Lakers play in both the 1981-82 and the 1982-83 postseasons?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "San Antonio Spurs" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Early in the 1981-82 Los Angeles Lakers season, Johnson complained to the media about head coach Paul Westhead and demanded a trade. Westhead was fired shortly after Johnsons criticisms, and although Lakers owner Jerry Buss stated that Johnsons comments did not factor into the decision, Johnson was vilified by the national media and booed both on the road and at home. Buss promoted assistant coach Pat Riley to \"co-head coach\" with Jerry West (although West considered himself Rileys assistant) on November 19 and the team won 17 of its next 20 games. Nicknamed \"Showtime (basketball)\" due to the teams new Johnson-led fast break-offense, the Lakers won the Pacific Division title and swept both the 1981-82 Phoenix Suns season and 1981-82 San Antonio Spurs season in the 1982 NBA Playoffs. Los Angeles stretched its postseason winning streak to nine games by taking the first contest of the 1982 NBA Finals from the 1981-82 Philadelphia 76ers season. The team won the Finals 4-2 to finish a 12-2 playoff run. On draft night in 1982 NBA draft, the Lakers had the first overall pick (the result of a trade with Cleveland midway through the 1979-80 season, when the Lakers had sent Don Ford and a 1980 first-round pick to the Cavaliers for Butch Lee and their 1982 selection) and selected James Worthy from North Carolina Tar Heels mens basketball. The 1982-83 Los Angeles Lakers season won the Pacific Division at 58-24, but Worthy suffered a leg injury in the last week of the season and missed the rest of the season. Nevertheless, they advanced to play 1982-83 Philadelphia 76ers season in the 1983 NBA Finals after defeating 1982-83 Portland Trail Blazers season and 1982-83 San Antonio Spurs season. The Sixers, however, won the series and the championship in four games. After the season West replaced Sharman as the teams GM." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Who was coach of the Lakers first, Paul Westhead or Pat Riley?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "Paul Westhead" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Early in the 1981-82 Los Angeles Lakers season, Johnson complained to the media about head coach Paul Westhead and demanded a trade. Westhead was fired shortly after Johnsons criticisms, and although Lakers owner Jerry Buss stated that Johnsons comments did not factor into the decision, Johnson was vilified by the national media and booed both on the road and at home. Buss promoted assistant coach Pat Riley to \"co-head coach\" with Jerry West (although West considered himself Rileys assistant) on November 19 and the team won 17 of its next 20 games. Nicknamed \"Showtime (basketball)\" due to the teams new Johnson-led fast break-offense, the Lakers won the Pacific Division title and swept both the 1981-82 Phoenix Suns season and 1981-82 San Antonio Spurs season in the 1982 NBA Playoffs. Los Angeles stretched its postseason winning streak to nine games by taking the first contest of the 1982 NBA Finals from the 1981-82 Philadelphia 76ers season. The team won the Finals 4-2 to finish a 12-2 playoff run. On draft night in 1982 NBA draft, the Lakers had the first overall pick (the result of a trade with Cleveland midway through the 1979-80 season, when the Lakers had sent Don Ford and a 1980 first-round pick to the Cavaliers for Butch Lee and their 1982 selection) and selected James Worthy from North Carolina Tar Heels mens basketball. The 1982-83 Los Angeles Lakers season won the Pacific Division at 58-24, but Worthy suffered a leg injury in the last week of the season and missed the rest of the season. Nevertheless, they advanced to play 1982-83 Philadelphia 76ers season in the 1983 NBA Finals after defeating 1982-83 Portland Trail Blazers season and 1982-83 San Antonio Spurs season. The Sixers, however, won the series and the championship in four games. After the season West replaced Sharman as the teams GM." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many games did the Lakers lose out of 20 after West and Riley were names co-head coaches?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "3" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Early in the 1981-82 Los Angeles Lakers season, Johnson complained to the media about head coach Paul Westhead and demanded a trade. Westhead was fired shortly after Johnsons criticisms, and although Lakers owner Jerry Buss stated that Johnsons comments did not factor into the decision, Johnson was vilified by the national media and booed both on the road and at home. Buss promoted assistant coach Pat Riley to \"co-head coach\" with Jerry West (although West considered himself Rileys assistant) on November 19 and the team won 17 of its next 20 games. Nicknamed \"Showtime (basketball)\" due to the teams new Johnson-led fast break-offense, the Lakers won the Pacific Division title and swept both the 1981-82 Phoenix Suns season and 1981-82 San Antonio Spurs season in the 1982 NBA Playoffs. Los Angeles stretched its postseason winning streak to nine games by taking the first contest of the 1982 NBA Finals from the 1981-82 Philadelphia 76ers season. The team won the Finals 4-2 to finish a 12-2 playoff run. On draft night in 1982 NBA draft, the Lakers had the first overall pick (the result of a trade with Cleveland midway through the 1979-80 season, when the Lakers had sent Don Ford and a 1980 first-round pick to the Cavaliers for Butch Lee and their 1982 selection) and selected James Worthy from North Carolina Tar Heels mens basketball. The 1982-83 Los Angeles Lakers season won the Pacific Division at 58-24, but Worthy suffered a leg injury in the last week of the season and missed the rest of the season. Nevertheless, they advanced to play 1982-83 Philadelphia 76ers season in the 1983 NBA Finals after defeating 1982-83 Portland Trail Blazers season and 1982-83 San Antonio Spurs season. The Sixers, however, won the series and the championship in four games. After the season West replaced Sharman as the teams GM." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Which team won the first contest of the NBA Finals, the Lakers or the 76ers?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "the Lakers" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Research funded by the Public Policy Institute of California indicates that in 1996, 1,786 Silicon Valley technology companies with $12.5 billion in sales and 46,000 employees were run by Indian or Chinese executives. Moreover, the pace of entrepreneurship among local immigrants is increasing rapidly. While Chinese or Indian executives are at the helm of 13% of the Silicon Valley technology businesses started between 1980 and 1985, they are running 27% of the more than 4,000 businesses started between 1991 and 1996. Start-up firms remain a primary source for new ideas and innovation for Chinese American internet entrepreneurs. Many of them are employed or directly engaged in new start-up activities. The proportional share of start-up firms by ethnic Chinese in Silicon Valley skyrocketed from 9% in 1980-1984 to about 20% between 1995-1998. By 2006, Chinese American internet entrepreneurs continued to start 20% of all Silicon Valley start-up firms, leading 2000 Silicon Valley companies, and employing 58,000 workers. They still continue to own about 20% of all information technology companies that were founded in Silicon Valley since 1980." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many percent did the number of Chinese American entrepreneurs in Silicon Valley increase from 1984 to 1995?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "11" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Research funded by the Public Policy Institute of California indicates that in 1996, 1,786 Silicon Valley technology companies with $12.5 billion in sales and 46,000 employees were run by Indian or Chinese executives. Moreover, the pace of entrepreneurship among local immigrants is increasing rapidly. While Chinese or Indian executives are at the helm of 13% of the Silicon Valley technology businesses started between 1980 and 1985, they are running 27% of the more than 4,000 businesses started between 1991 and 1996. Start-up firms remain a primary source for new ideas and innovation for Chinese American internet entrepreneurs. Many of them are employed or directly engaged in new start-up activities. The proportional share of start-up firms by ethnic Chinese in Silicon Valley skyrocketed from 9% in 1980-1984 to about 20% between 1995-1998. By 2006, Chinese American internet entrepreneurs continued to start 20% of all Silicon Valley start-up firms, leading 2000 Silicon Valley companies, and employing 58,000 workers. They still continue to own about 20% of all information technology companies that were founded in Silicon Valley since 1980." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Did Chinese and Indian executives run more technology businesses in the 80s or the 90s?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "90s" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Research funded by the Public Policy Institute of California indicates that in 1996, 1,786 Silicon Valley technology companies with $12.5 billion in sales and 46,000 employees were run by Indian or Chinese executives. Moreover, the pace of entrepreneurship among local immigrants is increasing rapidly. While Chinese or Indian executives are at the helm of 13% of the Silicon Valley technology businesses started between 1980 and 1985, they are running 27% of the more than 4,000 businesses started between 1991 and 1996. Start-up firms remain a primary source for new ideas and innovation for Chinese American internet entrepreneurs. Many of them are employed or directly engaged in new start-up activities. The proportional share of start-up firms by ethnic Chinese in Silicon Valley skyrocketed from 9% in 1980-1984 to about 20% between 1995-1998. By 2006, Chinese American internet entrepreneurs continued to start 20% of all Silicon Valley start-up firms, leading 2000 Silicon Valley companies, and employing 58,000 workers. They still continue to own about 20% of all information technology companies that were founded in Silicon Valley since 1980." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many percent more ethnic Chinese were in Silicon Valley between 1995-1998 than were in 1980-1984?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "11" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Research funded by the Public Policy Institute of California indicates that in 1996, 1,786 Silicon Valley technology companies with $12.5 billion in sales and 46,000 employees were run by Indian or Chinese executives. Moreover, the pace of entrepreneurship among local immigrants is increasing rapidly. While Chinese or Indian executives are at the helm of 13% of the Silicon Valley technology businesses started between 1980 and 1985, they are running 27% of the more than 4,000 businesses started between 1991 and 1996. Start-up firms remain a primary source for new ideas and innovation for Chinese American internet entrepreneurs. Many of them are employed or directly engaged in new start-up activities. The proportional share of start-up firms by ethnic Chinese in Silicon Valley skyrocketed from 9% in 1980-1984 to about 20% between 1995-1998. By 2006, Chinese American internet entrepreneurs continued to start 20% of all Silicon Valley start-up firms, leading 2000 Silicon Valley companies, and employing 58,000 workers. They still continue to own about 20% of all information technology companies that were founded in Silicon Valley since 1980." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many more workers were employed by Chinese American internet entrepreneurs in 2006 than were in 1996 by both Chinese and Indian executives?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "12000" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "More than 64,000 students applied for admission to the undergraduate class entering in 2018, with 12.9% being admitted. Among enrolled freshman for Fall 2017, the interquartile range for SAT composite scores was 1300 – 1500 and the average unweighted GPA was 3.76. Thirty-four percent of the accepted students in 2018 had perfect GPAs of 4.0 and 60 percent scored in the 99th percentile on standardized tests. There were 257 National Merit Scholarship Program enrolled during the 2016-17 academic year (including 60 recipients of the prestigious National Merit $2,500 Scholarship), ranking USC third in the nation. USC was ranked the 10th most applied to university in the nation for fall 2014 by U.S. News & World Report." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many percent of students that applied were not admitted?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "87.1" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "More than 64,000 students applied for admission to the undergraduate class entering in 2018, with 12.9% being admitted. Among enrolled freshman for Fall 2017, the interquartile range for SAT composite scores was 1300 – 1500 and the average unweighted GPA was 3.76. Thirty-four percent of the accepted students in 2018 had perfect GPAs of 4.0 and 60 percent scored in the 99th percentile on standardized tests. There were 257 National Merit Scholarship Program enrolled during the 2016-17 academic year (including 60 recipients of the prestigious National Merit $2,500 Scholarship), ranking USC third in the nation. USC was ranked the 10th most applied to university in the nation for fall 2014 by U.S. News & World Report." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many percent of the students admitted did not have a perfect GPA?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "66" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "In order to be eligible for in-work benefit, applicants must first have children under the age of 23, and from that point, benefits vary depending on marital status and the number of people employed per family. For a single parent in employment who earns between €6,600-€16,500, they are eligible for a maximum payable rate of up to €1,250 annually per child. For a married couple whose collective income is between €10,000 and is less than €24,000 (the income of one of the spouses must be over €3,000), they are eligible for a maximum payment rate of up to €1,200 annually per child. In 2016, the in-work benefit was extended to married couples where only one parent works, extending the benefit to an additional 3,700 families. For a married couple with only one parent gainfully employed whose income is greater than €6,600 and less than €16,500, they are eligible for a maximum payable rate of up to €350 yearly per child. The in-work benefit is paid quarterly in January, April, July, and October." }, { "role": "user", "content": "What is the most per child a married couple can get per year that makes between between €10,000 and is less than €24,000?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "€1,200" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Some economic historians have observed that Standard Oil was in the process of losing its monopoly at the time of its breakup in 1911. Although Standard had 90 percent of American refining capacity in 1880, by 1911 that had shrunk to between 60 and 65 percent, due to the expansion in capacity by competitors. Numerous regional competitors (such as Pure Oil in the East, Texaco and Gulf Oil in the Gulf Coast, Cities Service Company and Sun Oil in the Midcontinent, Union Oil in California, and Royal Dutch Shell overseas) had organized themselves into competitive vertically integrated oil companies, the industry structure pioneered years earlier by Standard itself. In addition, demand for petroleum products was increasing more rapidly than the ability of Standard to expand. The result was that although in 1911 Standard still controlled most production in the older regions of the Appalachian Basin (78 percent share, down from 92 percent in 1880), Lima-Indiana (90 percent, down from 95 percent in 1906), and the Illinois Basin (83 percent, down from 100 percent in 1906), its share was much lower in the rapidly expanding new regions that would dominate U.S. oil production in the 20th century. In 1911 Standard controlled only 44 percent of production in the Midcontinent, 29 percent in California, and 10 percent on the Gulf Coast." }, { "role": "user", "content": "In which area did Standard's percent share drop the most by 1911?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "Illinois Basin" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Some economic historians have observed that Standard Oil was in the process of losing its monopoly at the time of its breakup in 1911. Although Standard had 90 percent of American refining capacity in 1880, by 1911 that had shrunk to between 60 and 65 percent, due to the expansion in capacity by competitors. Numerous regional competitors (such as Pure Oil in the East, Texaco and Gulf Oil in the Gulf Coast, Cities Service Company and Sun Oil in the Midcontinent, Union Oil in California, and Royal Dutch Shell overseas) had organized themselves into competitive vertically integrated oil companies, the industry structure pioneered years earlier by Standard itself. In addition, demand for petroleum products was increasing more rapidly than the ability of Standard to expand. The result was that although in 1911 Standard still controlled most production in the older regions of the Appalachian Basin (78 percent share, down from 92 percent in 1880), Lima-Indiana (90 percent, down from 95 percent in 1906), and the Illinois Basin (83 percent, down from 100 percent in 1906), its share was much lower in the rapidly expanding new regions that would dominate U.S. oil production in the 20th century. In 1911 Standard controlled only 44 percent of production in the Midcontinent, 29 percent in California, and 10 percent on the Gulf Coast." }, { "role": "user", "content": "In which area did Standard's percent share drop the least by 1911?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "Lima-Indiana" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Some economic historians have observed that Standard Oil was in the process of losing its monopoly at the time of its breakup in 1911. Although Standard had 90 percent of American refining capacity in 1880, by 1911 that had shrunk to between 60 and 65 percent, due to the expansion in capacity by competitors. Numerous regional competitors (such as Pure Oil in the East, Texaco and Gulf Oil in the Gulf Coast, Cities Service Company and Sun Oil in the Midcontinent, Union Oil in California, and Royal Dutch Shell overseas) had organized themselves into competitive vertically integrated oil companies, the industry structure pioneered years earlier by Standard itself. In addition, demand for petroleum products was increasing more rapidly than the ability of Standard to expand. The result was that although in 1911 Standard still controlled most production in the older regions of the Appalachian Basin (78 percent share, down from 92 percent in 1880), Lima-Indiana (90 percent, down from 95 percent in 1906), and the Illinois Basin (83 percent, down from 100 percent in 1906), its share was much lower in the rapidly expanding new regions that would dominate U.S. oil production in the 20th century. In 1911 Standard controlled only 44 percent of production in the Midcontinent, 29 percent in California, and 10 percent on the Gulf Coast." }, { "role": "user", "content": "In 1911, which area of the country did Standard have the second lowest share?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "California" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "In 2007, the Peruvian economy experienced a growth rate of 9%, the highest in Latin America, and this repeated in 2008 with a 9.8% rate; in 2006 and 2007, the Lima Stock Exchange grew by 185.24% and 168.3%, respectively. However, in the wake of the 2008 global crisis, growth for 2009 was only 0.9 percent, but rebounded to 8.8 percent the following year. The pro-market policies enacted by Fujimori, were continued by presidents Alejandro Toledo and Alan Garcia, While poverty of Lima is 8.5%, the national average is 25.8%, while the unemployment rate is 6.5% and 74% are employed formally." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Which year did the Peruvian economy experience a higher growth rate, 2007 or 2008?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "2008" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "In 2007, the Peruvian economy experienced a growth rate of 9%, the highest in Latin America, and this repeated in 2008 with a 9.8% rate; in 2006 and 2007, the Lima Stock Exchange grew by 185.24% and 168.3%, respectively. However, in the wake of the 2008 global crisis, growth for 2009 was only 0.9 percent, but rebounded to 8.8 percent the following year. The pro-market policies enacted by Fujimori, were continued by presidents Alejandro Toledo and Alan Garcia, While poverty of Lima is 8.5%, the national average is 25.8%, while the unemployment rate is 6.5% and 74% are employed formally." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many percentage points higher with the growth rate of the Peruvian economy in 2008 compared to 2007?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": ".8" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "In 2007, the Peruvian economy experienced a growth rate of 9%, the highest in Latin America, and this repeated in 2008 with a 9.8% rate; in 2006 and 2007, the Lima Stock Exchange grew by 185.24% and 168.3%, respectively. However, in the wake of the 2008 global crisis, growth for 2009 was only 0.9 percent, but rebounded to 8.8 percent the following year. The pro-market policies enacted by Fujimori, were continued by presidents Alejandro Toledo and Alan Garcia, While poverty of Lima is 8.5%, the national average is 25.8%, while the unemployment rate is 6.5% and 74% are employed formally." }, { "role": "user", "content": "What year was the growth for the Lima Stock Exchange 8.8 percent?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "2010" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "In 2007, the Peruvian economy experienced a growth rate of 9%, the highest in Latin America, and this repeated in 2008 with a 9.8% rate; in 2006 and 2007, the Lima Stock Exchange grew by 185.24% and 168.3%, respectively. However, in the wake of the 2008 global crisis, growth for 2009 was only 0.9 percent, but rebounded to 8.8 percent the following year. The pro-market policies enacted by Fujimori, were continued by presidents Alejandro Toledo and Alan Garcia, While poverty of Lima is 8.5%, the national average is 25.8%, while the unemployment rate is 6.5% and 74% are employed formally." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many percentage points higher was the growth of the Lima Stock Exchange in 2010 compared to 2009?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "7.9" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "In 2007, the Peruvian economy experienced a growth rate of 9%, the highest in Latin America, and this repeated in 2008 with a 9.8% rate; in 2006 and 2007, the Lima Stock Exchange grew by 185.24% and 168.3%, respectively. However, in the wake of the 2008 global crisis, growth for 2009 was only 0.9 percent, but rebounded to 8.8 percent the following year. The pro-market policies enacted by Fujimori, were continued by presidents Alejandro Toledo and Alan Garcia, While poverty of Lima is 8.5%, the national average is 25.8%, while the unemployment rate is 6.5% and 74% are employed formally." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many percentage points lower was the Lima poverty rate compared to the national average?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "17.3" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "In 2007, the Peruvian economy experienced a growth rate of 9%, the highest in Latin America, and this repeated in 2008 with a 9.8% rate; in 2006 and 2007, the Lima Stock Exchange grew by 185.24% and 168.3%, respectively. However, in the wake of the 2008 global crisis, growth for 2009 was only 0.9 percent, but rebounded to 8.8 percent the following year. The pro-market policies enacted by Fujimori, were continued by presidents Alejandro Toledo and Alan Garcia, While poverty of Lima is 8.5%, the national average is 25.8%, while the unemployment rate is 6.5% and 74% are employed formally." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Which poverty rate is lower, the poverty rate of Lima or the national average poverty rate?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "poverty of Lima" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "In 2007, the Peruvian economy experienced a growth rate of 9%, the highest in Latin America, and this repeated in 2008 with a 9.8% rate; in 2006 and 2007, the Lima Stock Exchange grew by 185.24% and 168.3%, respectively. However, in the wake of the 2008 global crisis, growth for 2009 was only 0.9 percent, but rebounded to 8.8 percent the following year. The pro-market policies enacted by Fujimori, were continued by presidents Alejandro Toledo and Alan Garcia, While poverty of Lima is 8.5%, the national average is 25.8%, while the unemployment rate is 6.5% and 74% are employed formally." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Was the growth rate in the Peruvian economy higher in 2007 or 2008?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "2008" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "In 2007, the Peruvian economy experienced a growth rate of 9%, the highest in Latin America, and this repeated in 2008 with a 9.8% rate; in 2006 and 2007, the Lima Stock Exchange grew by 185.24% and 168.3%, respectively. However, in the wake of the 2008 global crisis, growth for 2009 was only 0.9 percent, but rebounded to 8.8 percent the following year. The pro-market policies enacted by Fujimori, were continued by presidents Alejandro Toledo and Alan Garcia, While poverty of Lima is 8.5%, the national average is 25.8%, while the unemployment rate is 6.5% and 74% are employed formally." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Was the growth in the Lima Stock Exchange higher in 2006 or 2007?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "2006" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "In 2007, the Peruvian economy experienced a growth rate of 9%, the highest in Latin America, and this repeated in 2008 with a 9.8% rate; in 2006 and 2007, the Lima Stock Exchange grew by 185.24% and 168.3%, respectively. However, in the wake of the 2008 global crisis, growth for 2009 was only 0.9 percent, but rebounded to 8.8 percent the following year. The pro-market policies enacted by Fujimori, were continued by presidents Alejandro Toledo and Alan Garcia, While poverty of Lima is 8.5%, the national average is 25.8%, while the unemployment rate is 6.5% and 74% are employed formally." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many percent of the Lima people are not poor?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "91.5" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "In 2007, the Peruvian economy experienced a growth rate of 9%, the highest in Latin America, and this repeated in 2008 with a 9.8% rate; in 2006 and 2007, the Lima Stock Exchange grew by 185.24% and 168.3%, respectively. However, in the wake of the 2008 global crisis, growth for 2009 was only 0.9 percent, but rebounded to 8.8 percent the following year. The pro-market policies enacted by Fujimori, were continued by presidents Alejandro Toledo and Alan Garcia, While poverty of Lima is 8.5%, the national average is 25.8%, while the unemployment rate is 6.5% and 74% are employed formally." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many percent of Lima residents are not unemployed?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "93.5" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "The most extensive county or county-equivalent is the Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area, Alaska, with a land area of 145,505 square miles (376,856 km2). All nine of the most extensive county-equivalents are in Alaska. The most extensive county is San Bernardino County, California, with a land area of 20,057 square miles (51,947 km2). The least extensive county is Kalawao County, Hawaii, with a land area of 11.991 square miles (31.058 km2). The least extensive county-equivalent in the 50 states is the independent city (United States) Falls Church, Virginia, with a land area of 1.999 square miles (5.177 km2). If U.S. territories are included, the least extensive county-equivalent is Kingman Reef, with a land area of 0.01 square miles (0.03 km2)." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many more square miles is San Bernardino County than Kalawao County?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "20045.009" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "There were 5,747 single family homes (or 30.8% of the total) out of a total of 18,631 inhabited buildings. There were 7,642 multi-family buildings (41.0%), along with 4,093 multi-purpose buildings that were mostly used for housing (22.0%) and 1,149 other use buildings (commercial or industrial) that also had some housing (6.2%). Of the single family homes 1090 were built before 1919, while 65 were built between 1990 and 2000. The greatest number of single family homes (3,474) were built between 1919 and 1945." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Were more homes built before 1919 or between 1990 and 2000?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "before 1919" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "There were 5,747 single family homes (or 30.8% of the total) out of a total of 18,631 inhabited buildings. There were 7,642 multi-family buildings (41.0%), along with 4,093 multi-purpose buildings that were mostly used for housing (22.0%) and 1,149 other use buildings (commercial or industrial) that also had some housing (6.2%). Of the single family homes 1090 were built before 1919, while 65 were built between 1990 and 2000. The greatest number of single family homes (3,474) were built between 1919 and 1945." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many more homes were built between 1919 and 1945 than were built before 1919?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "2384" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "There were 5,747 single family homes (or 30.8% of the total) out of a total of 18,631 inhabited buildings. There were 7,642 multi-family buildings (41.0%), along with 4,093 multi-purpose buildings that were mostly used for housing (22.0%) and 1,149 other use buildings (commercial or industrial) that also had some housing (6.2%). Of the single family homes 1090 were built before 1919, while 65 were built between 1990 and 2000. The greatest number of single family homes (3,474) were built between 1919 and 1945." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many inhabited buildings were not single family homes?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "12884" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "There were 5,747 single family homes (or 30.8% of the total) out of a total of 18,631 inhabited buildings. There were 7,642 multi-family buildings (41.0%), along with 4,093 multi-purpose buildings that were mostly used for housing (22.0%) and 1,149 other use buildings (commercial or industrial) that also had some housing (6.2%). Of the single family homes 1090 were built before 1919, while 65 were built between 1990 and 2000. The greatest number of single family homes (3,474) were built between 1919 and 1945." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Out of the total inhabited buildings were there more single family homes or multi-family buildings?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "multi-family buildings" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "There were 5,747 single family homes (or 30.8% of the total) out of a total of 18,631 inhabited buildings. There were 7,642 multi-family buildings (41.0%), along with 4,093 multi-purpose buildings that were mostly used for housing (22.0%) and 1,149 other use buildings (commercial or industrial) that also had some housing (6.2%). Of the single family homes 1090 were built before 1919, while 65 were built between 1990 and 2000. The greatest number of single family homes (3,474) were built between 1919 and 1945." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many more multi-family buildings were there than single family homes?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "1895" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "There were 5,747 single family homes (or 30.8% of the total) out of a total of 18,631 inhabited buildings. There were 7,642 multi-family buildings (41.0%), along with 4,093 multi-purpose buildings that were mostly used for housing (22.0%) and 1,149 other use buildings (commercial or industrial) that also had some housing (6.2%). Of the single family homes 1090 were built before 1919, while 65 were built between 1990 and 2000. The greatest number of single family homes (3,474) were built between 1919 and 1945." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many more multi-family buildings were there than multi-purpose buildings?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "3549" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "From 1995 to 2011, the Horizon League has sent 24 teams to the NCAA Mens Division I Basketball Tournament. Those clubs have produced 22 wins in those 14 years, including five \"Sweet 16\" appearances, making the Horizon League the only Mid-major conference with Sweet 16 participants in at least five of the last nine tournaments (2003, 2005, 2007, 2010 and 2011). Four schools from the conference have produced \"modern-day\" Sweet 16 appearances - Loyola (1985 NCAA Mens Division I Basketball Tournament), Xavier (1990 NCAA Mens Division I Basketball Tournament), Butler (2003 NCAA Mens Division I Basketball Tournament, 2007 NCAA Mens Division I Basketball Tournament, 2010 NCAA Mens Division I Basketball Tournament and 2011 NCAA Mens Division I Basketball Tournament), and Milwaukee (2005 NCAA Mens Division I Basketball Tournament). The Horizon League has compiled a 15-8 record in the past five years in the NCAA tournament, ranking tops among all NCAA Division I conferences for winning percentage in that span. Butler appeared in the mens national championship game in both 2009-10 Butler Bulldogs mens basketball team and 2010-11 Butler Bulldogs mens basketball team, losing both times. Since the NCAA began seeding teams in 1979, Loyolas 4 seed in the 1985 tournament is the best for a Horizon League team. The Horizon League currently holds the best winning percentage among non-Automatic Qualifying conference in the mens NCAA basketball Tournament (.488, 7th overall amongst the 31 Division I conferences)." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Which school form the conference produced modern day Sweet 16 appearances in 1985?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "Loyola" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Although the Dolphins were unable to match their 17-0 perfect season of 1972, many sports writers, fans and Dolphins players themselves felt that the 1973 team was better. While the 1972 team faced no competition that possessed a record better than 8-6 in the regular season, the 1973 team played a much tougher schedule that included games against the 1973 Oakland Raiders season, 1973 Pittsburgh Steelers season and 1973 Dallas Cowboys season (all playoff teams), plus two games against a resurgent 1973 Buffalo Bills season squad that featured 2,000-yard rusher O.J. Simpson. Despite this, the Dolphins finished the 1973 season giving up fewer points (150) than in 1972, and recorded a 12-2 record, including an opening-game victory over the San Francisco 49ers that tied an NFL record with 18 consecutive wins. The Dolphins winning streak ended in Week 2 with a 12-7 loss to the Raiders in Berkeley, California." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many more points did the Raiders score than the Dolphins in Week 2?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "5" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Although the Dolphins were unable to match their 17-0 perfect season of 1972, many sports writers, fans and Dolphins players themselves felt that the 1973 team was better. While the 1972 team faced no competition that possessed a record better than 8-6 in the regular season, the 1973 team played a much tougher schedule that included games against the 1973 Oakland Raiders season, 1973 Pittsburgh Steelers season and 1973 Dallas Cowboys season (all playoff teams), plus two games against a resurgent 1973 Buffalo Bills season squad that featured 2,000-yard rusher O.J. Simpson. Despite this, the Dolphins finished the 1973 season giving up fewer points (150) than in 1972, and recorded a 12-2 record, including an opening-game victory over the San Francisco 49ers that tied an NFL record with 18 consecutive wins. The Dolphins winning streak ended in Week 2 with a 12-7 loss to the Raiders in Berkeley, California." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many points did the Dolphins lose to the Raiders by in Week 2?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "5" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": " The Indianapolis Colts began their 2011 season at Reliant Stadium against the Houston Texans. For the first time since the 1998 season, Peyton Manning was not under the helm at quarterback and it was recently acquired Kerry Collins that would take his position. The game started very well for the Colts, opening up with an interception by Melvin Bullitt that allowed the Colts to take control. However, a three and out from the offense quickly gave the Texans the ball to drive down and score a field goal and take a 3-0 lead. Collins and the Colts offense was out of sync for much of the first quarter, fumbling two snaps and giving Houston the great field position inside of the Indianapolis 40-yard line. After the first quarter, the Texans held a commanding 17-0 lead and were firing on all cylinders. The second quarter continued Houston's dominance, with all three teams of the Colts failing to stop or to execute against the Texans. At halftime, the Colts trailed Houston 34-0, the largest deficit in the entire 58-year history of the franchise. The second half saw little action with both teams taking shorter drives and in some senses, running down the clock. The Colts scored their first and the only points scored in the second half with a Reggie Wayne touchdown from Collins in the fourth quarter. The Colts went on to lose to the Texans 34-7, their second straight season starting 0-1." }, { "role": "user", "content": "how many points did the Texans lead after the first quarter?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "17" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": " The Indianapolis Colts began their 2011 season at Reliant Stadium against the Houston Texans. For the first time since the 1998 season, Peyton Manning was not under the helm at quarterback and it was recently acquired Kerry Collins that would take his position. The game started very well for the Colts, opening up with an interception by Melvin Bullitt that allowed the Colts to take control. However, a three and out from the offense quickly gave the Texans the ball to drive down and score a field goal and take a 3-0 lead. Collins and the Colts offense was out of sync for much of the first quarter, fumbling two snaps and giving Houston the great field position inside of the Indianapolis 40-yard line. After the first quarter, the Texans held a commanding 17-0 lead and were firing on all cylinders. The second quarter continued Houston's dominance, with all three teams of the Colts failing to stop or to execute against the Texans. At halftime, the Colts trailed Houston 34-0, the largest deficit in the entire 58-year history of the franchise. The second half saw little action with both teams taking shorter drives and in some senses, running down the clock. The Colts scored their first and the only points scored in the second half with a Reggie Wayne touchdown from Collins in the fourth quarter. The Colts went on to lose to the Texans 34-7, their second straight season starting 0-1." }, { "role": "user", "content": "how many points did the Colts have at half time?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "34" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": " The Indianapolis Colts began their 2011 season at Reliant Stadium against the Houston Texans. For the first time since the 1998 season, Peyton Manning was not under the helm at quarterback and it was recently acquired Kerry Collins that would take his position. The game started very well for the Colts, opening up with an interception by Melvin Bullitt that allowed the Colts to take control. However, a three and out from the offense quickly gave the Texans the ball to drive down and score a field goal and take a 3-0 lead. Collins and the Colts offense was out of sync for much of the first quarter, fumbling two snaps and giving Houston the great field position inside of the Indianapolis 40-yard line. After the first quarter, the Texans held a commanding 17-0 lead and were firing on all cylinders. The second quarter continued Houston's dominance, with all three teams of the Colts failing to stop or to execute against the Texans. At halftime, the Colts trailed Houston 34-0, the largest deficit in the entire 58-year history of the franchise. The second half saw little action with both teams taking shorter drives and in some senses, running down the clock. The Colts scored their first and the only points scored in the second half with a Reggie Wayne touchdown from Collins in the fourth quarter. The Colts went on to lose to the Texans 34-7, their second straight season starting 0-1." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many points were scored in the first half?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "34" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": " The Indianapolis Colts began their 2011 season at Reliant Stadium against the Houston Texans. For the first time since the 1998 season, Peyton Manning was not under the helm at quarterback and it was recently acquired Kerry Collins that would take his position. The game started very well for the Colts, opening up with an interception by Melvin Bullitt that allowed the Colts to take control. However, a three and out from the offense quickly gave the Texans the ball to drive down and score a field goal and take a 3-0 lead. Collins and the Colts offense was out of sync for much of the first quarter, fumbling two snaps and giving Houston the great field position inside of the Indianapolis 40-yard line. After the first quarter, the Texans held a commanding 17-0 lead and were firing on all cylinders. The second quarter continued Houston's dominance, with all three teams of the Colts failing to stop or to execute against the Texans. At halftime, the Colts trailed Houston 34-0, the largest deficit in the entire 58-year history of the franchise. The second half saw little action with both teams taking shorter drives and in some senses, running down the clock. The Colts scored their first and the only points scored in the second half with a Reggie Wayne touchdown from Collins in the fourth quarter. The Colts went on to lose to the Texans 34-7, their second straight season starting 0-1." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many points did the Colts lose by?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "27" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": " The Indianapolis Colts began their 2011 season at Reliant Stadium against the Houston Texans. For the first time since the 1998 season, Peyton Manning was not under the helm at quarterback and it was recently acquired Kerry Collins that would take his position. The game started very well for the Colts, opening up with an interception by Melvin Bullitt that allowed the Colts to take control. However, a three and out from the offense quickly gave the Texans the ball to drive down and score a field goal and take a 3-0 lead. Collins and the Colts offense was out of sync for much of the first quarter, fumbling two snaps and giving Houston the great field position inside of the Indianapolis 40-yard line. After the first quarter, the Texans held a commanding 17-0 lead and were firing on all cylinders. The second quarter continued Houston's dominance, with all three teams of the Colts failing to stop or to execute against the Texans. At halftime, the Colts trailed Houston 34-0, the largest deficit in the entire 58-year history of the franchise. The second half saw little action with both teams taking shorter drives and in some senses, running down the clock. The Colts scored their first and the only points scored in the second half with a Reggie Wayne touchdown from Collins in the fourth quarter. The Colts went on to lose to the Texans 34-7, their second straight season starting 0-1." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many total points were scored?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "41" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": " The Indianapolis Colts began their 2011 season at Reliant Stadium against the Houston Texans. For the first time since the 1998 season, Peyton Manning was not under the helm at quarterback and it was recently acquired Kerry Collins that would take his position. The game started very well for the Colts, opening up with an interception by Melvin Bullitt that allowed the Colts to take control. However, a three and out from the offense quickly gave the Texans the ball to drive down and score a field goal and take a 3-0 lead. Collins and the Colts offense was out of sync for much of the first quarter, fumbling two snaps and giving Houston the great field position inside of the Indianapolis 40-yard line. After the first quarter, the Texans held a commanding 17-0 lead and were firing on all cylinders. The second quarter continued Houston's dominance, with all three teams of the Colts failing to stop or to execute against the Texans. At halftime, the Colts trailed Houston 34-0, the largest deficit in the entire 58-year history of the franchise. The second half saw little action with both teams taking shorter drives and in some senses, running down the clock. The Colts scored their first and the only points scored in the second half with a Reggie Wayne touchdown from Collins in the fourth quarter. The Colts went on to lose to the Texans 34-7, their second straight season starting 0-1." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many points were scored in the first half of the game?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "34" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": " The Indianapolis Colts began their 2011 season at Reliant Stadium against the Houston Texans. For the first time since the 1998 season, Peyton Manning was not under the helm at quarterback and it was recently acquired Kerry Collins that would take his position. The game started very well for the Colts, opening up with an interception by Melvin Bullitt that allowed the Colts to take control. However, a three and out from the offense quickly gave the Texans the ball to drive down and score a field goal and take a 3-0 lead. Collins and the Colts offense was out of sync for much of the first quarter, fumbling two snaps and giving Houston the great field position inside of the Indianapolis 40-yard line. After the first quarter, the Texans held a commanding 17-0 lead and were firing on all cylinders. The second quarter continued Houston's dominance, with all three teams of the Colts failing to stop or to execute against the Texans. At halftime, the Colts trailed Houston 34-0, the largest deficit in the entire 58-year history of the franchise. The second half saw little action with both teams taking shorter drives and in some senses, running down the clock. The Colts scored their first and the only points scored in the second half with a Reggie Wayne touchdown from Collins in the fourth quarter. The Colts went on to lose to the Texans 34-7, their second straight season starting 0-1." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many total points were scored in the game?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "41" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": " The Indianapolis Colts began their 2011 season at Reliant Stadium against the Houston Texans. For the first time since the 1998 season, Peyton Manning was not under the helm at quarterback and it was recently acquired Kerry Collins that would take his position. The game started very well for the Colts, opening up with an interception by Melvin Bullitt that allowed the Colts to take control. However, a three and out from the offense quickly gave the Texans the ball to drive down and score a field goal and take a 3-0 lead. Collins and the Colts offense was out of sync for much of the first quarter, fumbling two snaps and giving Houston the great field position inside of the Indianapolis 40-yard line. After the first quarter, the Texans held a commanding 17-0 lead and were firing on all cylinders. The second quarter continued Houston's dominance, with all three teams of the Colts failing to stop or to execute against the Texans. At halftime, the Colts trailed Houston 34-0, the largest deficit in the entire 58-year history of the franchise. The second half saw little action with both teams taking shorter drives and in some senses, running down the clock. The Colts scored their first and the only points scored in the second half with a Reggie Wayne touchdown from Collins in the fourth quarter. The Colts went on to lose to the Texans 34-7, their second straight season starting 0-1." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many points were scored in the second half of the game?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "7" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": " The Indianapolis Colts began their 2011 season at Reliant Stadium against the Houston Texans. For the first time since the 1998 season, Peyton Manning was not under the helm at quarterback and it was recently acquired Kerry Collins that would take his position. The game started very well for the Colts, opening up with an interception by Melvin Bullitt that allowed the Colts to take control. However, a three and out from the offense quickly gave the Texans the ball to drive down and score a field goal and take a 3-0 lead. Collins and the Colts offense was out of sync for much of the first quarter, fumbling two snaps and giving Houston the great field position inside of the Indianapolis 40-yard line. After the first quarter, the Texans held a commanding 17-0 lead and were firing on all cylinders. The second quarter continued Houston's dominance, with all three teams of the Colts failing to stop or to execute against the Texans. At halftime, the Colts trailed Houston 34-0, the largest deficit in the entire 58-year history of the franchise. The second half saw little action with both teams taking shorter drives and in some senses, running down the clock. The Colts scored their first and the only points scored in the second half with a Reggie Wayne touchdown from Collins in the fourth quarter. The Colts went on to lose to the Texans 34-7, their second straight season starting 0-1." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many points did the Texans win the game by?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "27" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Christopher Columbus landed on the island on December 5, 1492, which the native Taíno people had inhabited since the 7th century. The Captaincy General of Santo Domingo became the site of the first permanent European colonization of the Americas in the Americas, the oldest continuously inhabited city, and the first seat of the Spanish colonial rule in the New World. After more than three hundred years of Spanish rule the Dominican people Republic of Spanish Haiti. The leader of the independence movement José Núñez de Cáceres, intended the Dominican nation to unite with the country of Gran Colombia, but no longer under Spains custody the newly independent Dominicans were Unification of Hispaniola. Independence came 22 years later after victory in the Dominican War of Independence in 1844. Over the next 72 years the Dominican Republic experienced mostly civil war and a Spanish occupation of the Dominican Republic (but Spain had not come to take away its independence) before permanently ousting Spanish rule during the Dominican Restoration War of 1863–1865. A United States occupation of the Dominican Republic (1916–24) lasted eight years between 1916 and 1924, and a subsequent calm and prosperous six-year period under Horacio Vásquez was followed by the dictatorship of Rafael Trujillo until 1961. A civil war in 1965, the countrys last, was ended by United States occupation of the Dominican Republic (1965–66) and was followed by the authoritarian rule of Joaquín Balaguer (1966–1978 & 1986–1996), the rules of Antonio Guzmán Fernández (1972–1978) & Salvador Jorge Blanco (1982–1986). Since 1996, the Dominican Republic has moved toward representative democracy and has been led by Leonel Fernández for most of the time since 1996. Danilo Medina, the Dominican Republics current president, succeeded Fernandez in 2012, winning 51% of the electoral vote over his opponent ex-president Hipólito Mejía." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Which year period was the longest ruling period of Joaquín Balaguer , the one starting in 1966 or 1986?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "1966" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Christopher Columbus landed on the island on December 5, 1492, which the native Taíno people had inhabited since the 7th century. The Captaincy General of Santo Domingo became the site of the first permanent European colonization of the Americas in the Americas, the oldest continuously inhabited city, and the first seat of the Spanish colonial rule in the New World. After more than three hundred years of Spanish rule the Dominican people Republic of Spanish Haiti. The leader of the independence movement José Núñez de Cáceres, intended the Dominican nation to unite with the country of Gran Colombia, but no longer under Spains custody the newly independent Dominicans were Unification of Hispaniola. Independence came 22 years later after victory in the Dominican War of Independence in 1844. Over the next 72 years the Dominican Republic experienced mostly civil war and a Spanish occupation of the Dominican Republic (but Spain had not come to take away its independence) before permanently ousting Spanish rule during the Dominican Restoration War of 1863–1865. A United States occupation of the Dominican Republic (1916–24) lasted eight years between 1916 and 1924, and a subsequent calm and prosperous six-year period under Horacio Vásquez was followed by the dictatorship of Rafael Trujillo until 1961. A civil war in 1965, the countrys last, was ended by United States occupation of the Dominican Republic (1965–66) and was followed by the authoritarian rule of Joaquín Balaguer (1966–1978 & 1986–1996), the rules of Antonio Guzmán Fernández (1972–1978) & Salvador Jorge Blanco (1982–1986). Since 1996, the Dominican Republic has moved toward representative democracy and has been led by Leonel Fernández for most of the time since 1996. Danilo Medina, the Dominican Republics current president, succeeded Fernandez in 2012, winning 51% of the electoral vote over his opponent ex-president Hipólito Mejía." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Who ruled for a longer time, Antonio Guzmán Fernández or Salvador Jorge Blanco?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "Antonio Guzmán Fernández" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Christopher Columbus landed on the island on December 5, 1492, which the native Taíno people had inhabited since the 7th century. The Captaincy General of Santo Domingo became the site of the first permanent European colonization of the Americas in the Americas, the oldest continuously inhabited city, and the first seat of the Spanish colonial rule in the New World. After more than three hundred years of Spanish rule the Dominican people Republic of Spanish Haiti. The leader of the independence movement José Núñez de Cáceres, intended the Dominican nation to unite with the country of Gran Colombia, but no longer under Spains custody the newly independent Dominicans were Unification of Hispaniola. Independence came 22 years later after victory in the Dominican War of Independence in 1844. Over the next 72 years the Dominican Republic experienced mostly civil war and a Spanish occupation of the Dominican Republic (but Spain had not come to take away its independence) before permanently ousting Spanish rule during the Dominican Restoration War of 1863–1865. A United States occupation of the Dominican Republic (1916–24) lasted eight years between 1916 and 1924, and a subsequent calm and prosperous six-year period under Horacio Vásquez was followed by the dictatorship of Rafael Trujillo until 1961. A civil war in 1965, the countrys last, was ended by United States occupation of the Dominican Republic (1965–66) and was followed by the authoritarian rule of Joaquín Balaguer (1966–1978 & 1986–1996), the rules of Antonio Guzmán Fernández (1972–1978) & Salvador Jorge Blanco (1982–1986). Since 1996, the Dominican Republic has moved toward representative democracy and has been led by Leonel Fernández for most of the time since 1996. Danilo Medina, the Dominican Republics current president, succeeded Fernandez in 2012, winning 51% of the electoral vote over his opponent ex-president Hipólito Mejía." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many years was the Dominican Republic led by Leonel Fernández?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "16" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "The Americans first game was played on July 10, 1974, against the Southern California Sun in front of a crowd of 53,231 at Legion Field. (The announced attendance of 53,231 was inflated. The actual attendance figure was 43,031 for the opening game, of which 41,799 had paid.) Held scoreless by the Sun for the first three quarters and trailing by a touchdown at the start of the fourth quarter, the Americans came back to win 11-7. In their first road game, the Americans overcame a 26-point deficit at halftime to win 32-29 over the New York Stars (WFL) in front of 17,943 at Downing Stadium on July 17, 1974. The second home game, a 58-33 win over the Memphis Southmen on July 24, drew an announced attendance of 61,319 fans (actual attendance was 54,413 with 40,367 paying)." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many of the attendees for the July 10 game did not pay?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "1232" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "The Americans first game was played on July 10, 1974, against the Southern California Sun in front of a crowd of 53,231 at Legion Field. (The announced attendance of 53,231 was inflated. The actual attendance figure was 43,031 for the opening game, of which 41,799 had paid.) Held scoreless by the Sun for the first three quarters and trailing by a touchdown at the start of the fourth quarter, the Americans came back to win 11-7. In their first road game, the Americans overcame a 26-point deficit at halftime to win 32-29 over the New York Stars (WFL) in front of 17,943 at Downing Stadium on July 17, 1974. The second home game, a 58-33 win over the Memphis Southmen on July 24, drew an announced attendance of 61,319 fans (actual attendance was 54,413 with 40,367 paying)." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many points did the American score in all three games combined?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "101" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "The Americans first game was played on July 10, 1974, against the Southern California Sun in front of a crowd of 53,231 at Legion Field. (The announced attendance of 53,231 was inflated. The actual attendance figure was 43,031 for the opening game, of which 41,799 had paid.) Held scoreless by the Sun for the first three quarters and trailing by a touchdown at the start of the fourth quarter, the Americans came back to win 11-7. In their first road game, the Americans overcame a 26-point deficit at halftime to win 32-29 over the New York Stars (WFL) in front of 17,943 at Downing Stadium on July 17, 1974. The second home game, a 58-33 win over the Memphis Southmen on July 24, drew an announced attendance of 61,319 fans (actual attendance was 54,413 with 40,367 paying)." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many points did the Americans have scored against them in all three games combined?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "69" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "The Americans first game was played on July 10, 1974, against the Southern California Sun in front of a crowd of 53,231 at Legion Field. (The announced attendance of 53,231 was inflated. The actual attendance figure was 43,031 for the opening game, of which 41,799 had paid.) Held scoreless by the Sun for the first three quarters and trailing by a touchdown at the start of the fourth quarter, the Americans came back to win 11-7. In their first road game, the Americans overcame a 26-point deficit at halftime to win 32-29 over the New York Stars (WFL) in front of 17,943 at Downing Stadium on July 17, 1974. The second home game, a 58-33 win over the Memphis Southmen on July 24, drew an announced attendance of 61,319 fans (actual attendance was 54,413 with 40,367 paying)." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many of the attendees for the July 17 game did not pay?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "14046" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "The Americans first game was played on July 10, 1974, against the Southern California Sun in front of a crowd of 53,231 at Legion Field. (The announced attendance of 53,231 was inflated. The actual attendance figure was 43,031 for the opening game, of which 41,799 had paid.) Held scoreless by the Sun for the first three quarters and trailing by a touchdown at the start of the fourth quarter, the Americans came back to win 11-7. In their first road game, the Americans overcame a 26-point deficit at halftime to win 32-29 over the New York Stars (WFL) in front of 17,943 at Downing Stadium on July 17, 1974. The second home game, a 58-33 win over the Memphis Southmen on July 24, drew an announced attendance of 61,319 fans (actual attendance was 54,413 with 40,367 paying)." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many people combined attended all three games?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "115387" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "The Americans first game was played on July 10, 1974, against the Southern California Sun in front of a crowd of 53,231 at Legion Field. (The announced attendance of 53,231 was inflated. The actual attendance figure was 43,031 for the opening game, of which 41,799 had paid.) Held scoreless by the Sun for the first three quarters and trailing by a touchdown at the start of the fourth quarter, the Americans came back to win 11-7. In their first road game, the Americans overcame a 26-point deficit at halftime to win 32-29 over the New York Stars (WFL) in front of 17,943 at Downing Stadium on July 17, 1974. The second home game, a 58-33 win over the Memphis Southmen on July 24, drew an announced attendance of 61,319 fans (actual attendance was 54,413 with 40,367 paying)." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many fewer people had paid to attend the July 10, 1974 than was announced as the attendance?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "10432" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "The Americans first game was played on July 10, 1974, against the Southern California Sun in front of a crowd of 53,231 at Legion Field. (The announced attendance of 53,231 was inflated. The actual attendance figure was 43,031 for the opening game, of which 41,799 had paid.) Held scoreless by the Sun for the first three quarters and trailing by a touchdown at the start of the fourth quarter, the Americans came back to win 11-7. In their first road game, the Americans overcame a 26-point deficit at halftime to win 32-29 over the New York Stars (WFL) in front of 17,943 at Downing Stadium on July 17, 1974. The second home game, a 58-33 win over the Memphis Southmen on July 24, drew an announced attendance of 61,319 fans (actual attendance was 54,413 with 40,367 paying)." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many points did the Americans score during the fourth quarter of their July 10, 1974 game?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "11" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "The Americans first game was played on July 10, 1974, against the Southern California Sun in front of a crowd of 53,231 at Legion Field. (The announced attendance of 53,231 was inflated. The actual attendance figure was 43,031 for the opening game, of which 41,799 had paid.) Held scoreless by the Sun for the first three quarters and trailing by a touchdown at the start of the fourth quarter, the Americans came back to win 11-7. In their first road game, the Americans overcame a 26-point deficit at halftime to win 32-29 over the New York Stars (WFL) in front of 17,943 at Downing Stadium on July 17, 1974. The second home game, a 58-33 win over the Memphis Southmen on July 24, drew an announced attendance of 61,319 fans (actual attendance was 54,413 with 40,367 paying)." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many more people were actually at the game on July 10th compared with July 17th?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "25088" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "The Americans first game was played on July 10, 1974, against the Southern California Sun in front of a crowd of 53,231 at Legion Field. (The announced attendance of 53,231 was inflated. The actual attendance figure was 43,031 for the opening game, of which 41,799 had paid.) Held scoreless by the Sun for the first three quarters and trailing by a touchdown at the start of the fourth quarter, the Americans came back to win 11-7. In their first road game, the Americans overcame a 26-point deficit at halftime to win 32-29 over the New York Stars (WFL) in front of 17,943 at Downing Stadium on July 17, 1974. The second home game, a 58-33 win over the Memphis Southmen on July 24, drew an announced attendance of 61,319 fans (actual attendance was 54,413 with 40,367 paying)." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Against which team did the Americans score the most points?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "Memphis Southmen" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "The Americans first game was played on July 10, 1974, against the Southern California Sun in front of a crowd of 53,231 at Legion Field. (The announced attendance of 53,231 was inflated. The actual attendance figure was 43,031 for the opening game, of which 41,799 had paid.) Held scoreless by the Sun for the first three quarters and trailing by a touchdown at the start of the fourth quarter, the Americans came back to win 11-7. In their first road game, the Americans overcame a 26-point deficit at halftime to win 32-29 over the New York Stars (WFL) in front of 17,943 at Downing Stadium on July 17, 1974. The second home game, a 58-33 win over the Memphis Southmen on July 24, drew an announced attendance of 61,319 fans (actual attendance was 54,413 with 40,367 paying)." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Which team scored the most points against the Americans?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "Memphis Southmen" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "The Americans first game was played on July 10, 1974, against the Southern California Sun in front of a crowd of 53,231 at Legion Field. (The announced attendance of 53,231 was inflated. The actual attendance figure was 43,031 for the opening game, of which 41,799 had paid.) Held scoreless by the Sun for the first three quarters and trailing by a touchdown at the start of the fourth quarter, the Americans came back to win 11-7. In their first road game, the Americans overcame a 26-point deficit at halftime to win 32-29 over the New York Stars (WFL) in front of 17,943 at Downing Stadium on July 17, 1974. The second home game, a 58-33 win over the Memphis Southmen on July 24, drew an announced attendance of 61,319 fans (actual attendance was 54,413 with 40,367 paying)." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many people were claimed (inaccurately) to be in attendance at the July 10th and 24th games?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "114550" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "The length of the pitch, or field, for international adult matches is in the range of 100–110 m (110–120 yd) and the width is in the range of 64–75 m (70–80 yd). Fields for non-international matches may be 90–120 m (100–130 yd) length and 45–90 m (50–100 yd) in width, provided that the pitch does not become square. In 2008, the IFAB initially approved a fixed size of 105 m (344 ft) long and 68 m (223 ft) wide as a standard pitch dimension for international matches; however, this decision was later put on hold and was never actually implemented." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many meters difference is there between the minimum and maximum lengths of the field for international adult matches?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "10" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "The length of the pitch, or field, for international adult matches is in the range of 100–110 m (110–120 yd) and the width is in the range of 64–75 m (70–80 yd). Fields for non-international matches may be 90–120 m (100–130 yd) length and 45–90 m (50–100 yd) in width, provided that the pitch does not become square. In 2008, the IFAB initially approved a fixed size of 105 m (344 ft) long and 68 m (223 ft) wide as a standard pitch dimension for international matches; however, this decision was later put on hold and was never actually implemented." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many meters longer is the IFAB's approved fixed length than the width?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "37" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Plunkett finished the game with 16 out of 25 pass completions for 172 yards and a touchdown. Theismann threw for more yards than Plunkett (243), but was just 16 out of 35 and was intercepted twice. He was also sacked six times. Branch was the top receiver of the game with six receptions for 94 yards and a touchdown. Guy punted seven times for 299 yards (42.7 average), with 244 net yards (34.8 average) and planted five of his seven punts inside the 20. Martin recorded a sack, a pass deflection, and a fumble recovery. Riggins, who had rushed for over 100 yards in his last six postseason games, was held to 64 yards and a touchdown on 26 carries, with his longest gain being just 8 yards. Brown was their top receiver with three receptions for 93 yards. Tight end Clint Didier caught five passes for 65 yards. Garrett recorded 100 yards on kickoff returns, and one reception for 17 yards. Part of both of Allens touchdown runs were cutbacks, which, according to New York Daily News writer Larry Fox, burned an overpursuing Redskins defense." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many more interceptions did Theismann have than Plunkett?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "2" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Plunkett finished the game with 16 out of 25 pass completions for 172 yards and a touchdown. Theismann threw for more yards than Plunkett (243), but was just 16 out of 35 and was intercepted twice. He was also sacked six times. Branch was the top receiver of the game with six receptions for 94 yards and a touchdown. Guy punted seven times for 299 yards (42.7 average), with 244 net yards (34.8 average) and planted five of his seven punts inside the 20. Martin recorded a sack, a pass deflection, and a fumble recovery. Riggins, who had rushed for over 100 yards in his last six postseason games, was held to 64 yards and a touchdown on 26 carries, with his longest gain being just 8 yards. Brown was their top receiver with three receptions for 93 yards. Tight end Clint Didier caught five passes for 65 yards. Garrett recorded 100 yards on kickoff returns, and one reception for 17 yards. Part of both of Allens touchdown runs were cutbacks, which, according to New York Daily News writer Larry Fox, burned an overpursuing Redskins defense." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many completed passes did both quarterbacks have?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "16" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Plunkett finished the game with 16 out of 25 pass completions for 172 yards and a touchdown. Theismann threw for more yards than Plunkett (243), but was just 16 out of 35 and was intercepted twice. He was also sacked six times. Branch was the top receiver of the game with six receptions for 94 yards and a touchdown. Guy punted seven times for 299 yards (42.7 average), with 244 net yards (34.8 average) and planted five of his seven punts inside the 20. Martin recorded a sack, a pass deflection, and a fumble recovery. Riggins, who had rushed for over 100 yards in his last six postseason games, was held to 64 yards and a touchdown on 26 carries, with his longest gain being just 8 yards. Brown was their top receiver with three receptions for 93 yards. Tight end Clint Didier caught five passes for 65 yards. Garrett recorded 100 yards on kickoff returns, and one reception for 17 yards. Part of both of Allens touchdown runs were cutbacks, which, according to New York Daily News writer Larry Fox, burned an overpursuing Redskins defense." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many incomplete passes did Theismann have?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "19" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Plunkett finished the game with 16 out of 25 pass completions for 172 yards and a touchdown. Theismann threw for more yards than Plunkett (243), but was just 16 out of 35 and was intercepted twice. He was also sacked six times. Branch was the top receiver of the game with six receptions for 94 yards and a touchdown. Guy punted seven times for 299 yards (42.7 average), with 244 net yards (34.8 average) and planted five of his seven punts inside the 20. Martin recorded a sack, a pass deflection, and a fumble recovery. Riggins, who had rushed for over 100 yards in his last six postseason games, was held to 64 yards and a touchdown on 26 carries, with his longest gain being just 8 yards. Brown was their top receiver with three receptions for 93 yards. Tight end Clint Didier caught five passes for 65 yards. Garrett recorded 100 yards on kickoff returns, and one reception for 17 yards. Part of both of Allens touchdown runs were cutbacks, which, according to New York Daily News writer Larry Fox, burned an overpursuing Redskins defense." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many of Guy's punts were not inside the 20?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "2" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Plunkett finished the game with 16 out of 25 pass completions for 172 yards and a touchdown. Theismann threw for more yards than Plunkett (243), but was just 16 out of 35 and was intercepted twice. He was also sacked six times. Branch was the top receiver of the game with six receptions for 94 yards and a touchdown. Guy punted seven times for 299 yards (42.7 average), with 244 net yards (34.8 average) and planted five of his seven punts inside the 20. Martin recorded a sack, a pass deflection, and a fumble recovery. Riggins, who had rushed for over 100 yards in his last six postseason games, was held to 64 yards and a touchdown on 26 carries, with his longest gain being just 8 yards. Brown was their top receiver with three receptions for 93 yards. Tight end Clint Didier caught five passes for 65 yards. Garrett recorded 100 yards on kickoff returns, and one reception for 17 yards. Part of both of Allens touchdown runs were cutbacks, which, according to New York Daily News writer Larry Fox, burned an overpursuing Redskins defense." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many more receptions did Branch have than Brown?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "3" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Plunkett finished the game with 16 out of 25 pass completions for 172 yards and a touchdown. Theismann threw for more yards than Plunkett (243), but was just 16 out of 35 and was intercepted twice. He was also sacked six times. Branch was the top receiver of the game with six receptions for 94 yards and a touchdown. Guy punted seven times for 299 yards (42.7 average), with 244 net yards (34.8 average) and planted five of his seven punts inside the 20. Martin recorded a sack, a pass deflection, and a fumble recovery. Riggins, who had rushed for over 100 yards in his last six postseason games, was held to 64 yards and a touchdown on 26 carries, with his longest gain being just 8 yards. Brown was their top receiver with three receptions for 93 yards. Tight end Clint Didier caught five passes for 65 yards. Garrett recorded 100 yards on kickoff returns, and one reception for 17 yards. Part of both of Allens touchdown runs were cutbacks, which, according to New York Daily News writer Larry Fox, burned an overpursuing Redskins defense." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many yards long, to two decimal places, were Plunkett's completions on average?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "10.75" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Plunkett finished the game with 16 out of 25 pass completions for 172 yards and a touchdown. Theismann threw for more yards than Plunkett (243), but was just 16 out of 35 and was intercepted twice. He was also sacked six times. Branch was the top receiver of the game with six receptions for 94 yards and a touchdown. Guy punted seven times for 299 yards (42.7 average), with 244 net yards (34.8 average) and planted five of his seven punts inside the 20. Martin recorded a sack, a pass deflection, and a fumble recovery. Riggins, who had rushed for over 100 yards in his last six postseason games, was held to 64 yards and a touchdown on 26 carries, with his longest gain being just 8 yards. Brown was their top receiver with three receptions for 93 yards. Tight end Clint Didier caught five passes for 65 yards. Garrett recorded 100 yards on kickoff returns, and one reception for 17 yards. Part of both of Allens touchdown runs were cutbacks, which, according to New York Daily News writer Larry Fox, burned an overpursuing Redskins defense." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Which player threw fewer incomplete passes, Plunkett or Theismann?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "Plunkett" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Plunkett finished the game with 16 out of 25 pass completions for 172 yards and a touchdown. Theismann threw for more yards than Plunkett (243), but was just 16 out of 35 and was intercepted twice. He was also sacked six times. Branch was the top receiver of the game with six receptions for 94 yards and a touchdown. Guy punted seven times for 299 yards (42.7 average), with 244 net yards (34.8 average) and planted five of his seven punts inside the 20. Martin recorded a sack, a pass deflection, and a fumble recovery. Riggins, who had rushed for over 100 yards in his last six postseason games, was held to 64 yards and a touchdown on 26 carries, with his longest gain being just 8 yards. Brown was their top receiver with three receptions for 93 yards. Tight end Clint Didier caught five passes for 65 yards. Garrett recorded 100 yards on kickoff returns, and one reception for 17 yards. Part of both of Allens touchdown runs were cutbacks, which, according to New York Daily News writer Larry Fox, burned an overpursuing Redskins defense." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many incomplete passes did Plunkett and Theismann throw combined?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "28" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Plunkett finished the game with 16 out of 25 pass completions for 172 yards and a touchdown. Theismann threw for more yards than Plunkett (243), but was just 16 out of 35 and was intercepted twice. He was also sacked six times. Branch was the top receiver of the game with six receptions for 94 yards and a touchdown. Guy punted seven times for 299 yards (42.7 average), with 244 net yards (34.8 average) and planted five of his seven punts inside the 20. Martin recorded a sack, a pass deflection, and a fumble recovery. Riggins, who had rushed for over 100 yards in his last six postseason games, was held to 64 yards and a touchdown on 26 carries, with his longest gain being just 8 yards. Brown was their top receiver with three receptions for 93 yards. Tight end Clint Didier caught five passes for 65 yards. Garrett recorded 100 yards on kickoff returns, and one reception for 17 yards. Part of both of Allens touchdown runs were cutbacks, which, according to New York Daily News writer Larry Fox, burned an overpursuing Redskins defense." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many yards long, to two decimal places, were Theismann's completions on average?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "15.19" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Plunkett finished the game with 16 out of 25 pass completions for 172 yards and a touchdown. Theismann threw for more yards than Plunkett (243), but was just 16 out of 35 and was intercepted twice. He was also sacked six times. Branch was the top receiver of the game with six receptions for 94 yards and a touchdown. Guy punted seven times for 299 yards (42.7 average), with 244 net yards (34.8 average) and planted five of his seven punts inside the 20. Martin recorded a sack, a pass deflection, and a fumble recovery. Riggins, who had rushed for over 100 yards in his last six postseason games, was held to 64 yards and a touchdown on 26 carries, with his longest gain being just 8 yards. Brown was their top receiver with three receptions for 93 yards. Tight end Clint Didier caught five passes for 65 yards. Garrett recorded 100 yards on kickoff returns, and one reception for 17 yards. Part of both of Allens touchdown runs were cutbacks, which, according to New York Daily News writer Larry Fox, burned an overpursuing Redskins defense." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Who threw for fewer yards per completion on average, Plunkett or Theismann?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "Plunkett" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Plunkett finished the game with 16 out of 25 pass completions for 172 yards and a touchdown. Theismann threw for more yards than Plunkett (243), but was just 16 out of 35 and was intercepted twice. He was also sacked six times. Branch was the top receiver of the game with six receptions for 94 yards and a touchdown. Guy punted seven times for 299 yards (42.7 average), with 244 net yards (34.8 average) and planted five of his seven punts inside the 20. Martin recorded a sack, a pass deflection, and a fumble recovery. Riggins, who had rushed for over 100 yards in his last six postseason games, was held to 64 yards and a touchdown on 26 carries, with his longest gain being just 8 yards. Brown was their top receiver with three receptions for 93 yards. Tight end Clint Didier caught five passes for 65 yards. Garrett recorded 100 yards on kickoff returns, and one reception for 17 yards. Part of both of Allens touchdown runs were cutbacks, which, according to New York Daily News writer Larry Fox, burned an overpursuing Redskins defense." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many yards long, to two decimal places, were Branch's receptions on average?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "15.67" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Plunkett finished the game with 16 out of 25 pass completions for 172 yards and a touchdown. Theismann threw for more yards than Plunkett (243), but was just 16 out of 35 and was intercepted twice. He was also sacked six times. Branch was the top receiver of the game with six receptions for 94 yards and a touchdown. Guy punted seven times for 299 yards (42.7 average), with 244 net yards (34.8 average) and planted five of his seven punts inside the 20. Martin recorded a sack, a pass deflection, and a fumble recovery. Riggins, who had rushed for over 100 yards in his last six postseason games, was held to 64 yards and a touchdown on 26 carries, with his longest gain being just 8 yards. Brown was their top receiver with three receptions for 93 yards. Tight end Clint Didier caught five passes for 65 yards. Garrett recorded 100 yards on kickoff returns, and one reception for 17 yards. Part of both of Allens touchdown runs were cutbacks, which, according to New York Daily News writer Larry Fox, burned an overpursuing Redskins defense." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many yards long, to two decimal places, were Riggins' carries on average?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "2.46" } ]
[ { "role": "user", "content": "use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards.Respond with just the correct answer only.For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'.If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters." }, { "role": "user", "content": "Plunkett finished the game with 16 out of 25 pass completions for 172 yards and a touchdown. Theismann threw for more yards than Plunkett (243), but was just 16 out of 35 and was intercepted twice. He was also sacked six times. Branch was the top receiver of the game with six receptions for 94 yards and a touchdown. Guy punted seven times for 299 yards (42.7 average), with 244 net yards (34.8 average) and planted five of his seven punts inside the 20. Martin recorded a sack, a pass deflection, and a fumble recovery. Riggins, who had rushed for over 100 yards in his last six postseason games, was held to 64 yards and a touchdown on 26 carries, with his longest gain being just 8 yards. Brown was their top receiver with three receptions for 93 yards. Tight end Clint Didier caught five passes for 65 yards. Garrett recorded 100 yards on kickoff returns, and one reception for 17 yards. Part of both of Allens touchdown runs were cutbacks, which, according to New York Daily News writer Larry Fox, burned an overpursuing Redskins defense." }, { "role": "user", "content": "How many yards long were Brown's receptions on average?" }, { "role": "assistant", "content": "31" } ]