messages
listlengths 4
4
|
|---|
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "On 28 May 1975 James Whetter left MK to form the Cornish Nationalist Party which was campaigning for full Cornish independence. The party declined in the 1980s and was close to collapse by 1990. It did not contest the 1984 European Parliament election; it received 1.9% of the vote in Cornwall and West Plymouth in the 1989 election. During this period, the party focussed on its opposition to the creation of a South West England region. It also campaigned against the construction of a nuclear station at Luxulyan and proposals to increase house-building in Cornwall. In 1988, MK established the Campaign for a Cornish Constituency, which won the support of Cornwall County Council, all the district authorities, several Cornish organisations and three of Cornwall's five MPs. The campaign was well-publicised, attained national attention, and collected over 3,000 signatures in three months. Loveday Jenkin was elected its leader in 1990. The party's vote share declined further to 1.5% of the vote in the 1994 European Parliament election, in the new constituency of Cornwall and West Plymouth. In 1996, MK published 'Cornwall 2000 - The Way Ahead', its most detailed manifesto to date. On 4 October 1997, at the Mebyon Kernow National Conference, Jenkin was replaced by Dick Cole as the leader of MK."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Who left MK to form the Cornish Nationalist Party?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Whetter"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "On 28 May 1975 James Whetter left MK to form the Cornish Nationalist Party which was campaigning for full Cornish independence. The party declined in the 1980s and was close to collapse by 1990. It did not contest the 1984 European Parliament election; it received 1.9% of the vote in Cornwall and West Plymouth in the 1989 election. During this period, the party focussed on its opposition to the creation of a South West England region. It also campaigned against the construction of a nuclear station at Luxulyan and proposals to increase house-building in Cornwall. In 1988, MK established the Campaign for a Cornish Constituency, which won the support of Cornwall County Council, all the district authorities, several Cornish organisations and three of Cornwall's five MPs. The campaign was well-publicised, attained national attention, and collected over 3,000 signatures in three months. Loveday Jenkin was elected its leader in 1990. The party's vote share declined further to 1.5% of the vote in the 1994 European Parliament election, in the new constituency of Cornwall and West Plymouth. In 1996, MK published 'Cornwall 2000 - The Way Ahead', its most detailed manifesto to date. On 4 October 1997, at the Mebyon Kernow National Conference, Jenkin was replaced by Dick Cole as the leader of MK."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many months did it take them to collect 3000 signatures?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "3"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "On 28 May 1975 James Whetter left MK to form the Cornish Nationalist Party which was campaigning for full Cornish independence. The party declined in the 1980s and was close to collapse by 1990. It did not contest the 1984 European Parliament election; it received 1.9% of the vote in Cornwall and West Plymouth in the 1989 election. During this period, the party focussed on its opposition to the creation of a South West England region. It also campaigned against the construction of a nuclear station at Luxulyan and proposals to increase house-building in Cornwall. In 1988, MK established the Campaign for a Cornish Constituency, which won the support of Cornwall County Council, all the district authorities, several Cornish organisations and three of Cornwall's five MPs. The campaign was well-publicised, attained national attention, and collected over 3,000 signatures in three months. Loveday Jenkin was elected its leader in 1990. The party's vote share declined further to 1.5% of the vote in the 1994 European Parliament election, in the new constituency of Cornwall and West Plymouth. In 1996, MK published 'Cornwall 2000 - The Way Ahead', its most detailed manifesto to date. On 4 October 1997, at the Mebyon Kernow National Conference, Jenkin was replaced by Dick Cole as the leader of MK."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many years was Loveday Jeken a leader?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "7"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "On 28 May 1975 James Whetter left MK to form the Cornish Nationalist Party which was campaigning for full Cornish independence. The party declined in the 1980s and was close to collapse by 1990. It did not contest the 1984 European Parliament election; it received 1.9% of the vote in Cornwall and West Plymouth in the 1989 election. During this period, the party focussed on its opposition to the creation of a South West England region. It also campaigned against the construction of a nuclear station at Luxulyan and proposals to increase house-building in Cornwall. In 1988, MK established the Campaign for a Cornish Constituency, which won the support of Cornwall County Council, all the district authorities, several Cornish organisations and three of Cornwall's five MPs. The campaign was well-publicised, attained national attention, and collected over 3,000 signatures in three months. Loveday Jenkin was elected its leader in 1990. The party's vote share declined further to 1.5% of the vote in the 1994 European Parliament election, in the new constituency of Cornwall and West Plymouth. In 1996, MK published 'Cornwall 2000 - The Way Ahead', its most detailed manifesto to date. On 4 October 1997, at the Mebyon Kernow National Conference, Jenkin was replaced by Dick Cole as the leader of MK."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Who was the first leader of MK, Jenkin or Dick cole?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Jenkin"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "On 28 May 1975 James Whetter left MK to form the Cornish Nationalist Party which was campaigning for full Cornish independence. The party declined in the 1980s and was close to collapse by 1990. It did not contest the 1984 European Parliament election; it received 1.9% of the vote in Cornwall and West Plymouth in the 1989 election. During this period, the party focussed on its opposition to the creation of a South West England region. It also campaigned against the construction of a nuclear station at Luxulyan and proposals to increase house-building in Cornwall. In 1988, MK established the Campaign for a Cornish Constituency, which won the support of Cornwall County Council, all the district authorities, several Cornish organisations and three of Cornwall's five MPs. The campaign was well-publicised, attained national attention, and collected over 3,000 signatures in three months. Loveday Jenkin was elected its leader in 1990. The party's vote share declined further to 1.5% of the vote in the 1994 European Parliament election, in the new constituency of Cornwall and West Plymouth. In 1996, MK published 'Cornwall 2000 - The Way Ahead', its most detailed manifesto to date. On 4 October 1997, at the Mebyon Kernow National Conference, Jenkin was replaced by Dick Cole as the leader of MK."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which happened last, Cornish Nationalist Party's campaign for Cornish independence or Constituency?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Constituency"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "On 28 May 1975 James Whetter left MK to form the Cornish Nationalist Party which was campaigning for full Cornish independence. The party declined in the 1980s and was close to collapse by 1990. It did not contest the 1984 European Parliament election; it received 1.9% of the vote in Cornwall and West Plymouth in the 1989 election. During this period, the party focussed on its opposition to the creation of a South West England region. It also campaigned against the construction of a nuclear station at Luxulyan and proposals to increase house-building in Cornwall. In 1988, MK established the Campaign for a Cornish Constituency, which won the support of Cornwall County Council, all the district authorities, several Cornish organisations and three of Cornwall's five MPs. The campaign was well-publicised, attained national attention, and collected over 3,000 signatures in three months. Loveday Jenkin was elected its leader in 1990. The party's vote share declined further to 1.5% of the vote in the 1994 European Parliament election, in the new constituency of Cornwall and West Plymouth. In 1996, MK published 'Cornwall 2000 - The Way Ahead', its most detailed manifesto to date. On 4 October 1997, at the Mebyon Kernow National Conference, Jenkin was replaced by Dick Cole as the leader of MK."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "What happened first: Cornish Nationalist Party's creation or collapse?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "creation"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "On 28 May 1975 James Whetter left MK to form the Cornish Nationalist Party which was campaigning for full Cornish independence. The party declined in the 1980s and was close to collapse by 1990. It did not contest the 1984 European Parliament election; it received 1.9% of the vote in Cornwall and West Plymouth in the 1989 election. During this period, the party focussed on its opposition to the creation of a South West England region. It also campaigned against the construction of a nuclear station at Luxulyan and proposals to increase house-building in Cornwall. In 1988, MK established the Campaign for a Cornish Constituency, which won the support of Cornwall County Council, all the district authorities, several Cornish organisations and three of Cornwall's five MPs. The campaign was well-publicised, attained national attention, and collected over 3,000 signatures in three months. Loveday Jenkin was elected its leader in 1990. The party's vote share declined further to 1.5% of the vote in the 1994 European Parliament election, in the new constituency of Cornwall and West Plymouth. In 1996, MK published 'Cornwall 2000 - The Way Ahead', its most detailed manifesto to date. On 4 October 1997, at the Mebyon Kernow National Conference, Jenkin was replaced by Dick Cole as the leader of MK."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "What happened second: Cornish Nationalist Party's creation or collapse?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "collapse"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "On 28 May 1975 James Whetter left MK to form the Cornish Nationalist Party which was campaigning for full Cornish independence. The party declined in the 1980s and was close to collapse by 1990. It did not contest the 1984 European Parliament election; it received 1.9% of the vote in Cornwall and West Plymouth in the 1989 election. During this period, the party focussed on its opposition to the creation of a South West England region. It also campaigned against the construction of a nuclear station at Luxulyan and proposals to increase house-building in Cornwall. In 1988, MK established the Campaign for a Cornish Constituency, which won the support of Cornwall County Council, all the district authorities, several Cornish organisations and three of Cornwall's five MPs. The campaign was well-publicised, attained national attention, and collected over 3,000 signatures in three months. Loveday Jenkin was elected its leader in 1990. The party's vote share declined further to 1.5% of the vote in the 1994 European Parliament election, in the new constituency of Cornwall and West Plymouth. In 1996, MK published 'Cornwall 2000 - The Way Ahead', its most detailed manifesto to date. On 4 October 1997, at the Mebyon Kernow National Conference, Jenkin was replaced by Dick Cole as the leader of MK."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "What happened first: Campaign for a Cornish Constituency or Jenkin was elected MK's leader?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Campaign for a Cornish Constituency"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "On 28 May 1975 James Whetter left MK to form the Cornish Nationalist Party which was campaigning for full Cornish independence. The party declined in the 1980s and was close to collapse by 1990. It did not contest the 1984 European Parliament election; it received 1.9% of the vote in Cornwall and West Plymouth in the 1989 election. During this period, the party focussed on its opposition to the creation of a South West England region. It also campaigned against the construction of a nuclear station at Luxulyan and proposals to increase house-building in Cornwall. In 1988, MK established the Campaign for a Cornish Constituency, which won the support of Cornwall County Council, all the district authorities, several Cornish organisations and three of Cornwall's five MPs. The campaign was well-publicised, attained national attention, and collected over 3,000 signatures in three months. Loveday Jenkin was elected its leader in 1990. The party's vote share declined further to 1.5% of the vote in the 1994 European Parliament election, in the new constituency of Cornwall and West Plymouth. In 1996, MK published 'Cornwall 2000 - The Way Ahead', its most detailed manifesto to date. On 4 October 1997, at the Mebyon Kernow National Conference, Jenkin was replaced by Dick Cole as the leader of MK."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "What happened second: Campaign for a Cornish Constituency or Jenkin was elected MK's leader?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Jenkin was elected MK's leader"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "On 28 May 1975 James Whetter left MK to form the Cornish Nationalist Party which was campaigning for full Cornish independence. The party declined in the 1980s and was close to collapse by 1990. It did not contest the 1984 European Parliament election; it received 1.9% of the vote in Cornwall and West Plymouth in the 1989 election. During this period, the party focussed on its opposition to the creation of a South West England region. It also campaigned against the construction of a nuclear station at Luxulyan and proposals to increase house-building in Cornwall. In 1988, MK established the Campaign for a Cornish Constituency, which won the support of Cornwall County Council, all the district authorities, several Cornish organisations and three of Cornwall's five MPs. The campaign was well-publicised, attained national attention, and collected over 3,000 signatures in three months. Loveday Jenkin was elected its leader in 1990. The party's vote share declined further to 1.5% of the vote in the 1994 European Parliament election, in the new constituency of Cornwall and West Plymouth. In 1996, MK published 'Cornwall 2000 - The Way Ahead', its most detailed manifesto to date. On 4 October 1997, at the Mebyon Kernow National Conference, Jenkin was replaced by Dick Cole as the leader of MK."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "What happened first: formation of Cornish Nationalist Party or Dick Cole became MK's leader?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "formation of Cornish Nationalist Party"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "On 28 May 1975 James Whetter left MK to form the Cornish Nationalist Party which was campaigning for full Cornish independence. The party declined in the 1980s and was close to collapse by 1990. It did not contest the 1984 European Parliament election; it received 1.9% of the vote in Cornwall and West Plymouth in the 1989 election. During this period, the party focussed on its opposition to the creation of a South West England region. It also campaigned against the construction of a nuclear station at Luxulyan and proposals to increase house-building in Cornwall. In 1988, MK established the Campaign for a Cornish Constituency, which won the support of Cornwall County Council, all the district authorities, several Cornish organisations and three of Cornwall's five MPs. The campaign was well-publicised, attained national attention, and collected over 3,000 signatures in three months. Loveday Jenkin was elected its leader in 1990. The party's vote share declined further to 1.5% of the vote in the 1994 European Parliament election, in the new constituency of Cornwall and West Plymouth. In 1996, MK published 'Cornwall 2000 - The Way Ahead', its most detailed manifesto to date. On 4 October 1997, at the Mebyon Kernow National Conference, Jenkin was replaced by Dick Cole as the leader of MK."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "What happened second: formation of Cornish Nationalist Party or Dick Cole became MK's leader?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Dick Cole became MK's leader"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "On 28 May 1975 James Whetter left MK to form the Cornish Nationalist Party which was campaigning for full Cornish independence. The party declined in the 1980s and was close to collapse by 1990. It did not contest the 1984 European Parliament election; it received 1.9% of the vote in Cornwall and West Plymouth in the 1989 election. During this period, the party focussed on its opposition to the creation of a South West England region. It also campaigned against the construction of a nuclear station at Luxulyan and proposals to increase house-building in Cornwall. In 1988, MK established the Campaign for a Cornish Constituency, which won the support of Cornwall County Council, all the district authorities, several Cornish organisations and three of Cornwall's five MPs. The campaign was well-publicised, attained national attention, and collected over 3,000 signatures in three months. Loveday Jenkin was elected its leader in 1990. The party's vote share declined further to 1.5% of the vote in the 1994 European Parliament election, in the new constituency of Cornwall and West Plymouth. In 1996, MK published 'Cornwall 2000 - The Way Ahead', its most detailed manifesto to date. On 4 October 1997, at the Mebyon Kernow National Conference, Jenkin was replaced by Dick Cole as the leader of MK."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "What event happened first, James Whetter form Cornish Nationalist Party or MK established the Campaign for a Cornish Constituency?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "James Whetter form Cornish Nationalist Party"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "On 28 May 1975 James Whetter left MK to form the Cornish Nationalist Party which was campaigning for full Cornish independence. The party declined in the 1980s and was close to collapse by 1990. It did not contest the 1984 European Parliament election; it received 1.9% of the vote in Cornwall and West Plymouth in the 1989 election. During this period, the party focussed on its opposition to the creation of a South West England region. It also campaigned against the construction of a nuclear station at Luxulyan and proposals to increase house-building in Cornwall. In 1988, MK established the Campaign for a Cornish Constituency, which won the support of Cornwall County Council, all the district authorities, several Cornish organisations and three of Cornwall's five MPs. The campaign was well-publicised, attained national attention, and collected over 3,000 signatures in three months. Loveday Jenkin was elected its leader in 1990. The party's vote share declined further to 1.5% of the vote in the 1994 European Parliament election, in the new constituency of Cornwall and West Plymouth. In 1996, MK published 'Cornwall 2000 - The Way Ahead', its most detailed manifesto to date. On 4 October 1997, at the Mebyon Kernow National Conference, Jenkin was replaced by Dick Cole as the leader of MK."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many years did the party decline until it was close to collapse?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "10"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "On 28 May 1975 James Whetter left MK to form the Cornish Nationalist Party which was campaigning for full Cornish independence. The party declined in the 1980s and was close to collapse by 1990. It did not contest the 1984 European Parliament election; it received 1.9% of the vote in Cornwall and West Plymouth in the 1989 election. During this period, the party focussed on its opposition to the creation of a South West England region. It also campaigned against the construction of a nuclear station at Luxulyan and proposals to increase house-building in Cornwall. In 1988, MK established the Campaign for a Cornish Constituency, which won the support of Cornwall County Council, all the district authorities, several Cornish organisations and three of Cornwall's five MPs. The campaign was well-publicised, attained national attention, and collected over 3,000 signatures in three months. Loveday Jenkin was elected its leader in 1990. The party's vote share declined further to 1.5% of the vote in the 1994 European Parliament election, in the new constituency of Cornwall and West Plymouth. In 1996, MK published 'Cornwall 2000 - The Way Ahead', its most detailed manifesto to date. On 4 October 1997, at the Mebyon Kernow National Conference, Jenkin was replaced by Dick Cole as the leader of MK."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many years after James Whetter formed the Cornish Nationalist Party was it close to collapse?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "15"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "On 28 May 1975 James Whetter left MK to form the Cornish Nationalist Party which was campaigning for full Cornish independence. The party declined in the 1980s and was close to collapse by 1990. It did not contest the 1984 European Parliament election; it received 1.9% of the vote in Cornwall and West Plymouth in the 1989 election. During this period, the party focussed on its opposition to the creation of a South West England region. It also campaigned against the construction of a nuclear station at Luxulyan and proposals to increase house-building in Cornwall. In 1988, MK established the Campaign for a Cornish Constituency, which won the support of Cornwall County Council, all the district authorities, several Cornish organisations and three of Cornwall's five MPs. The campaign was well-publicised, attained national attention, and collected over 3,000 signatures in three months. Loveday Jenkin was elected its leader in 1990. The party's vote share declined further to 1.5% of the vote in the 1994 European Parliament election, in the new constituency of Cornwall and West Plymouth. In 1996, MK published 'Cornwall 2000 - The Way Ahead', its most detailed manifesto to date. On 4 October 1997, at the Mebyon Kernow National Conference, Jenkin was replaced by Dick Cole as the leader of MK."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many years was Jenkin the leader of MK?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "7"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "On 28 May 1975 James Whetter left MK to form the Cornish Nationalist Party which was campaigning for full Cornish independence. The party declined in the 1980s and was close to collapse by 1990. It did not contest the 1984 European Parliament election; it received 1.9% of the vote in Cornwall and West Plymouth in the 1989 election. During this period, the party focussed on its opposition to the creation of a South West England region. It also campaigned against the construction of a nuclear station at Luxulyan and proposals to increase house-building in Cornwall. In 1988, MK established the Campaign for a Cornish Constituency, which won the support of Cornwall County Council, all the district authorities, several Cornish organisations and three of Cornwall's five MPs. The campaign was well-publicised, attained national attention, and collected over 3,000 signatures in three months. Loveday Jenkin was elected its leader in 1990. The party's vote share declined further to 1.5% of the vote in the 1994 European Parliament election, in the new constituency of Cornwall and West Plymouth. In 1996, MK published 'Cornwall 2000 - The Way Ahead', its most detailed manifesto to date. On 4 October 1997, at the Mebyon Kernow National Conference, Jenkin was replaced by Dick Cole as the leader of MK."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Who was leader of MK first, Loveday Jenkin or Dick Cole?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Loveday Jenkin"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "On 28 May 1975 James Whetter left MK to form the Cornish Nationalist Party which was campaigning for full Cornish independence. The party declined in the 1980s and was close to collapse by 1990. It did not contest the 1984 European Parliament election; it received 1.9% of the vote in Cornwall and West Plymouth in the 1989 election. During this period, the party focussed on its opposition to the creation of a South West England region. It also campaigned against the construction of a nuclear station at Luxulyan and proposals to increase house-building in Cornwall. In 1988, MK established the Campaign for a Cornish Constituency, which won the support of Cornwall County Council, all the district authorities, several Cornish organisations and three of Cornwall's five MPs. The campaign was well-publicised, attained national attention, and collected over 3,000 signatures in three months. Loveday Jenkin was elected its leader in 1990. The party's vote share declined further to 1.5% of the vote in the 1994 European Parliament election, in the new constituency of Cornwall and West Plymouth. In 1996, MK published 'Cornwall 2000 - The Way Ahead', its most detailed manifesto to date. On 4 October 1997, at the Mebyon Kernow National Conference, Jenkin was replaced by Dick Cole as the leader of MK."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many years after MK established the Campaign for a Cornish Constituency was Loveday Jenkin elected its leader?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "2"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Hoping to rebound from their home loss to the Panthers, the Cardinals flew to FedExField for a Week 7 duel with the Washington Redskins. QB Kurt Warner got the start, despite having a torn left elbow ligament. In the first quarter, Arizona trailed early as Redskins RB Clinton Portis got a 2-yard TD run for the only score of the period. In the second quarter, things got worse for the Cards as Warner's second interception was returned by LB London Fletcher 27 yards for a touchdown. Arizona would finally respond as Warner threw a 2-yard TD pass to WR Anquan Boldin (with a failed PAT). In the third quarter, the Cards continued to struggle as Portis gave Washington a 1-yard TD run for the only score of the period. In the fourth quarter, Arizona managed to draw close with Warner and Boldin hooking up with each other again on a 10-yard TD pass, along with back-up QB Tim Rattay completing a 1-yard TD pass to TE Leonard Pope (with a failed 2-point conversion). The Cards would recover their onside kick and even get into position to get a game-winning 55-yard field goal from kicker Neil Rackers. The kick went wide left, securing their second-straight loss. With the loss, the Cardinals entered their bye week at 3-4."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which team scored first?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Redskins"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Hoping to rebound from their home loss to the Panthers, the Cardinals flew to FedExField for a Week 7 duel with the Washington Redskins. QB Kurt Warner got the start, despite having a torn left elbow ligament. In the first quarter, Arizona trailed early as Redskins RB Clinton Portis got a 2-yard TD run for the only score of the period. In the second quarter, things got worse for the Cards as Warner's second interception was returned by LB London Fletcher 27 yards for a touchdown. Arizona would finally respond as Warner threw a 2-yard TD pass to WR Anquan Boldin (with a failed PAT). In the third quarter, the Cards continued to struggle as Portis gave Washington a 1-yard TD run for the only score of the period. In the fourth quarter, Arizona managed to draw close with Warner and Boldin hooking up with each other again on a 10-yard TD pass, along with back-up QB Tim Rattay completing a 1-yard TD pass to TE Leonard Pope (with a failed 2-point conversion). The Cards would recover their onside kick and even get into position to get a game-winning 55-yard field goal from kicker Neil Rackers. The kick went wide left, securing their second-straight loss. With the loss, the Cardinals entered their bye week at 3-4."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which team scored first in the second half?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Washington"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Hoping to rebound from their home loss to the Panthers, the Cardinals flew to FedExField for a Week 7 duel with the Washington Redskins. QB Kurt Warner got the start, despite having a torn left elbow ligament. In the first quarter, Arizona trailed early as Redskins RB Clinton Portis got a 2-yard TD run for the only score of the period. In the second quarter, things got worse for the Cards as Warner's second interception was returned by LB London Fletcher 27 yards for a touchdown. Arizona would finally respond as Warner threw a 2-yard TD pass to WR Anquan Boldin (with a failed PAT). In the third quarter, the Cards continued to struggle as Portis gave Washington a 1-yard TD run for the only score of the period. In the fourth quarter, Arizona managed to draw close with Warner and Boldin hooking up with each other again on a 10-yard TD pass, along with back-up QB Tim Rattay completing a 1-yard TD pass to TE Leonard Pope (with a failed 2-point conversion). The Cards would recover their onside kick and even get into position to get a game-winning 55-yard field goal from kicker Neil Rackers. The kick went wide left, securing their second-straight loss. With the loss, the Cardinals entered their bye week at 3-4."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Who scored the last touchdown in the 4th quarter?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Leonard Pope"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Hoping to rebound from their home loss to the Panthers, the Cardinals flew to FedExField for a Week 7 duel with the Washington Redskins. QB Kurt Warner got the start, despite having a torn left elbow ligament. In the first quarter, Arizona trailed early as Redskins RB Clinton Portis got a 2-yard TD run for the only score of the period. In the second quarter, things got worse for the Cards as Warner's second interception was returned by LB London Fletcher 27 yards for a touchdown. Arizona would finally respond as Warner threw a 2-yard TD pass to WR Anquan Boldin (with a failed PAT). In the third quarter, the Cards continued to struggle as Portis gave Washington a 1-yard TD run for the only score of the period. In the fourth quarter, Arizona managed to draw close with Warner and Boldin hooking up with each other again on a 10-yard TD pass, along with back-up QB Tim Rattay completing a 1-yard TD pass to TE Leonard Pope (with a failed 2-point conversion). The Cards would recover their onside kick and even get into position to get a game-winning 55-yard field goal from kicker Neil Rackers. The kick went wide left, securing their second-straight loss. With the loss, the Cardinals entered their bye week at 3-4."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many wins did the Cardinals have entering their bye week?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "3"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Speed skating After a successful period around 1900, with Jaap Eden and Coen de Koning as World Champions, Dutch speed skating successes became numerous in the 1960s. Champions Kees Verkerk and Ard Schenk were immensely popular, causing a real speed skating hype in the country. Successes continue up to today, with the likes of Yvonne van Gennip (3 Olympic gold medals in 1988), Rintje Ritsma (4-time World Allround Champion), Jochem Uytdehaage (2 Olympic gold medals in 2002), Marianne Timmer (3 Olympic gold medals in 1998 and 2006), Ireen Wüst (5 Olympic golds in 2006, 2010, 2014, 2018 and 6 World Allround Speed Skating Championships) and Sven Kramer (4 Olympic gold medals in 2010, 2014, 2018 and 9 World Allround Championships). The Dutch speed skaters performance at the 2014 Winter Olympics, where they won 8 out of 12 events, 23 out of 36 medals, including 4 clean sweeps, is the most dominant performance in a single sport in Olympic history. Thialf Stadium in Heerenveen was the second indoor 400m speed skating oval in the world, the first to host an international championship and remains a world-class facility today. Dutch speed skaters have won 77 world single distance championchips (since 1996)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "In the 2014 Winter Olympics, how many events out of 12 did they not win?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "4"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Speed skating After a successful period around 1900, with Jaap Eden and Coen de Koning as World Champions, Dutch speed skating successes became numerous in the 1960s. Champions Kees Verkerk and Ard Schenk were immensely popular, causing a real speed skating hype in the country. Successes continue up to today, with the likes of Yvonne van Gennip (3 Olympic gold medals in 1988), Rintje Ritsma (4-time World Allround Champion), Jochem Uytdehaage (2 Olympic gold medals in 2002), Marianne Timmer (3 Olympic gold medals in 1998 and 2006), Ireen Wüst (5 Olympic golds in 2006, 2010, 2014, 2018 and 6 World Allround Speed Skating Championships) and Sven Kramer (4 Olympic gold medals in 2010, 2014, 2018 and 9 World Allround Championships). The Dutch speed skaters performance at the 2014 Winter Olympics, where they won 8 out of 12 events, 23 out of 36 medals, including 4 clean sweeps, is the most dominant performance in a single sport in Olympic history. Thialf Stadium in Heerenveen was the second indoor 400m speed skating oval in the world, the first to host an international championship and remains a world-class facility today. Dutch speed skaters have won 77 world single distance championchips (since 1996)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "In the 2014 Winter Olympics, how many medals did the Dutch speed skaters now win out of 36 medals?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "13"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Speed skating After a successful period around 1900, with Jaap Eden and Coen de Koning as World Champions, Dutch speed skating successes became numerous in the 1960s. Champions Kees Verkerk and Ard Schenk were immensely popular, causing a real speed skating hype in the country. Successes continue up to today, with the likes of Yvonne van Gennip (3 Olympic gold medals in 1988), Rintje Ritsma (4-time World Allround Champion), Jochem Uytdehaage (2 Olympic gold medals in 2002), Marianne Timmer (3 Olympic gold medals in 1998 and 2006), Ireen Wüst (5 Olympic golds in 2006, 2010, 2014, 2018 and 6 World Allround Speed Skating Championships) and Sven Kramer (4 Olympic gold medals in 2010, 2014, 2018 and 9 World Allround Championships). The Dutch speed skaters performance at the 2014 Winter Olympics, where they won 8 out of 12 events, 23 out of 36 medals, including 4 clean sweeps, is the most dominant performance in a single sport in Olympic history. Thialf Stadium in Heerenveen was the second indoor 400m speed skating oval in the world, the first to host an international championship and remains a world-class facility today. Dutch speed skaters have won 77 world single distance championchips (since 1996)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many Olympians won more than 4 Olympic gold medals in a single event?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "2"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Speed skating After a successful period around 1900, with Jaap Eden and Coen de Koning as World Champions, Dutch speed skating successes became numerous in the 1960s. Champions Kees Verkerk and Ard Schenk were immensely popular, causing a real speed skating hype in the country. Successes continue up to today, with the likes of Yvonne van Gennip (3 Olympic gold medals in 1988), Rintje Ritsma (4-time World Allround Champion), Jochem Uytdehaage (2 Olympic gold medals in 2002), Marianne Timmer (3 Olympic gold medals in 1998 and 2006), Ireen Wüst (5 Olympic golds in 2006, 2010, 2014, 2018 and 6 World Allround Speed Skating Championships) and Sven Kramer (4 Olympic gold medals in 2010, 2014, 2018 and 9 World Allround Championships). The Dutch speed skaters performance at the 2014 Winter Olympics, where they won 8 out of 12 events, 23 out of 36 medals, including 4 clean sweeps, is the most dominant performance in a single sport in Olympic history. Thialf Stadium in Heerenveen was the second indoor 400m speed skating oval in the world, the first to host an international championship and remains a world-class facility today. Dutch speed skaters have won 77 world single distance championchips (since 1996)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many Olympians won no more than 3 medals in a single event?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "3"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Speed skating After a successful period around 1900, with Jaap Eden and Coen de Koning as World Champions, Dutch speed skating successes became numerous in the 1960s. Champions Kees Verkerk and Ard Schenk were immensely popular, causing a real speed skating hype in the country. Successes continue up to today, with the likes of Yvonne van Gennip (3 Olympic gold medals in 1988), Rintje Ritsma (4-time World Allround Champion), Jochem Uytdehaage (2 Olympic gold medals in 2002), Marianne Timmer (3 Olympic gold medals in 1998 and 2006), Ireen Wüst (5 Olympic golds in 2006, 2010, 2014, 2018 and 6 World Allround Speed Skating Championships) and Sven Kramer (4 Olympic gold medals in 2010, 2014, 2018 and 9 World Allround Championships). The Dutch speed skaters performance at the 2014 Winter Olympics, where they won 8 out of 12 events, 23 out of 36 medals, including 4 clean sweeps, is the most dominant performance in a single sport in Olympic history. Thialf Stadium in Heerenveen was the second indoor 400m speed skating oval in the world, the first to host an international championship and remains a world-class facility today. Dutch speed skaters have won 77 world single distance championchips (since 1996)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many Olympians each won 4 or more medals in 2010, 2014, and 2018?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "2"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Speed skating After a successful period around 1900, with Jaap Eden and Coen de Koning as World Champions, Dutch speed skating successes became numerous in the 1960s. Champions Kees Verkerk and Ard Schenk were immensely popular, causing a real speed skating hype in the country. Successes continue up to today, with the likes of Yvonne van Gennip (3 Olympic gold medals in 1988), Rintje Ritsma (4-time World Allround Champion), Jochem Uytdehaage (2 Olympic gold medals in 2002), Marianne Timmer (3 Olympic gold medals in 1998 and 2006), Ireen Wüst (5 Olympic golds in 2006, 2010, 2014, 2018 and 6 World Allround Speed Skating Championships) and Sven Kramer (4 Olympic gold medals in 2010, 2014, 2018 and 9 World Allround Championships). The Dutch speed skaters performance at the 2014 Winter Olympics, where they won 8 out of 12 events, 23 out of 36 medals, including 4 clean sweeps, is the most dominant performance in a single sport in Olympic history. Thialf Stadium in Heerenveen was the second indoor 400m speed skating oval in the world, the first to host an international championship and remains a world-class facility today. Dutch speed skaters have won 77 world single distance championchips (since 1996)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many Olympians each won more than 4 gold medals in 2018 and at least 5 World Allround Speed Skating Championships?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "2"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Speed skating After a successful period around 1900, with Jaap Eden and Coen de Koning as World Champions, Dutch speed skating successes became numerous in the 1960s. Champions Kees Verkerk and Ard Schenk were immensely popular, causing a real speed skating hype in the country. Successes continue up to today, with the likes of Yvonne van Gennip (3 Olympic gold medals in 1988), Rintje Ritsma (4-time World Allround Champion), Jochem Uytdehaage (2 Olympic gold medals in 2002), Marianne Timmer (3 Olympic gold medals in 1998 and 2006), Ireen Wüst (5 Olympic golds in 2006, 2010, 2014, 2018 and 6 World Allround Speed Skating Championships) and Sven Kramer (4 Olympic gold medals in 2010, 2014, 2018 and 9 World Allround Championships). The Dutch speed skaters performance at the 2014 Winter Olympics, where they won 8 out of 12 events, 23 out of 36 medals, including 4 clean sweeps, is the most dominant performance in a single sport in Olympic history. Thialf Stadium in Heerenveen was the second indoor 400m speed skating oval in the world, the first to host an international championship and remains a world-class facility today. Dutch speed skaters have won 77 world single distance championchips (since 1996)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many skaters won at least 4 World Allround Championships?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "3"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Speed skating After a successful period around 1900, with Jaap Eden and Coen de Koning as World Champions, Dutch speed skating successes became numerous in the 1960s. Champions Kees Verkerk and Ard Schenk were immensely popular, causing a real speed skating hype in the country. Successes continue up to today, with the likes of Yvonne van Gennip (3 Olympic gold medals in 1988), Rintje Ritsma (4-time World Allround Champion), Jochem Uytdehaage (2 Olympic gold medals in 2002), Marianne Timmer (3 Olympic gold medals in 1998 and 2006), Ireen Wüst (5 Olympic golds in 2006, 2010, 2014, 2018 and 6 World Allround Speed Skating Championships) and Sven Kramer (4 Olympic gold medals in 2010, 2014, 2018 and 9 World Allround Championships). The Dutch speed skaters performance at the 2014 Winter Olympics, where they won 8 out of 12 events, 23 out of 36 medals, including 4 clean sweeps, is the most dominant performance in a single sport in Olympic history. Thialf Stadium in Heerenveen was the second indoor 400m speed skating oval in the world, the first to host an international championship and remains a world-class facility today. Dutch speed skaters have won 77 world single distance championchips (since 1996)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many of the skaters won a gold medal before 2006?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "2"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Speed skating After a successful period around 1900, with Jaap Eden and Coen de Koning as World Champions, Dutch speed skating successes became numerous in the 1960s. Champions Kees Verkerk and Ard Schenk were immensely popular, causing a real speed skating hype in the country. Successes continue up to today, with the likes of Yvonne van Gennip (3 Olympic gold medals in 1988), Rintje Ritsma (4-time World Allround Champion), Jochem Uytdehaage (2 Olympic gold medals in 2002), Marianne Timmer (3 Olympic gold medals in 1998 and 2006), Ireen Wüst (5 Olympic golds in 2006, 2010, 2014, 2018 and 6 World Allround Speed Skating Championships) and Sven Kramer (4 Olympic gold medals in 2010, 2014, 2018 and 9 World Allround Championships). The Dutch speed skaters performance at the 2014 Winter Olympics, where they won 8 out of 12 events, 23 out of 36 medals, including 4 clean sweeps, is the most dominant performance in a single sport in Olympic history. Thialf Stadium in Heerenveen was the second indoor 400m speed skating oval in the world, the first to host an international championship and remains a world-class facility today. Dutch speed skaters have won 77 world single distance championchips (since 1996)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many of the skaters won a total of 20 Olympic gold medals?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "1"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Speed skating After a successful period around 1900, with Jaap Eden and Coen de Koning as World Champions, Dutch speed skating successes became numerous in the 1960s. Champions Kees Verkerk and Ard Schenk were immensely popular, causing a real speed skating hype in the country. Successes continue up to today, with the likes of Yvonne van Gennip (3 Olympic gold medals in 1988), Rintje Ritsma (4-time World Allround Champion), Jochem Uytdehaage (2 Olympic gold medals in 2002), Marianne Timmer (3 Olympic gold medals in 1998 and 2006), Ireen Wüst (5 Olympic golds in 2006, 2010, 2014, 2018 and 6 World Allround Speed Skating Championships) and Sven Kramer (4 Olympic gold medals in 2010, 2014, 2018 and 9 World Allround Championships). The Dutch speed skaters performance at the 2014 Winter Olympics, where they won 8 out of 12 events, 23 out of 36 medals, including 4 clean sweeps, is the most dominant performance in a single sport in Olympic history. Thialf Stadium in Heerenveen was the second indoor 400m speed skating oval in the world, the first to host an international championship and remains a world-class facility today. Dutch speed skaters have won 77 world single distance championchips (since 1996)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many more Olympic events did Ireen Wüst win a gold medal in than Jochem Uytdehaage?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "3"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Speed skating After a successful period around 1900, with Jaap Eden and Coen de Koning as World Champions, Dutch speed skating successes became numerous in the 1960s. Champions Kees Verkerk and Ard Schenk were immensely popular, causing a real speed skating hype in the country. Successes continue up to today, with the likes of Yvonne van Gennip (3 Olympic gold medals in 1988), Rintje Ritsma (4-time World Allround Champion), Jochem Uytdehaage (2 Olympic gold medals in 2002), Marianne Timmer (3 Olympic gold medals in 1998 and 2006), Ireen Wüst (5 Olympic golds in 2006, 2010, 2014, 2018 and 6 World Allround Speed Skating Championships) and Sven Kramer (4 Olympic gold medals in 2010, 2014, 2018 and 9 World Allround Championships). The Dutch speed skaters performance at the 2014 Winter Olympics, where they won 8 out of 12 events, 23 out of 36 medals, including 4 clean sweeps, is the most dominant performance in a single sport in Olympic history. Thialf Stadium in Heerenveen was the second indoor 400m speed skating oval in the world, the first to host an international championship and remains a world-class facility today. Dutch speed skaters have won 77 world single distance championchips (since 1996)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many years were there between the 3 Olympic gold medals won by Marianne Timmer?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "8"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Speed skating After a successful period around 1900, with Jaap Eden and Coen de Koning as World Champions, Dutch speed skating successes became numerous in the 1960s. Champions Kees Verkerk and Ard Schenk were immensely popular, causing a real speed skating hype in the country. Successes continue up to today, with the likes of Yvonne van Gennip (3 Olympic gold medals in 1988), Rintje Ritsma (4-time World Allround Champion), Jochem Uytdehaage (2 Olympic gold medals in 2002), Marianne Timmer (3 Olympic gold medals in 1998 and 2006), Ireen Wüst (5 Olympic golds in 2006, 2010, 2014, 2018 and 6 World Allround Speed Skating Championships) and Sven Kramer (4 Olympic gold medals in 2010, 2014, 2018 and 9 World Allround Championships). The Dutch speed skaters performance at the 2014 Winter Olympics, where they won 8 out of 12 events, 23 out of 36 medals, including 4 clean sweeps, is the most dominant performance in a single sport in Olympic history. Thialf Stadium in Heerenveen was the second indoor 400m speed skating oval in the world, the first to host an international championship and remains a world-class facility today. Dutch speed skaters have won 77 world single distance championchips (since 1996)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many total Olympic golds and World Allround Speed Skating Championships did Ireen Wüst win?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "11"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Speed skating After a successful period around 1900, with Jaap Eden and Coen de Koning as World Champions, Dutch speed skating successes became numerous in the 1960s. Champions Kees Verkerk and Ard Schenk were immensely popular, causing a real speed skating hype in the country. Successes continue up to today, with the likes of Yvonne van Gennip (3 Olympic gold medals in 1988), Rintje Ritsma (4-time World Allround Champion), Jochem Uytdehaage (2 Olympic gold medals in 2002), Marianne Timmer (3 Olympic gold medals in 1998 and 2006), Ireen Wüst (5 Olympic golds in 2006, 2010, 2014, 2018 and 6 World Allround Speed Skating Championships) and Sven Kramer (4 Olympic gold medals in 2010, 2014, 2018 and 9 World Allround Championships). The Dutch speed skaters performance at the 2014 Winter Olympics, where they won 8 out of 12 events, 23 out of 36 medals, including 4 clean sweeps, is the most dominant performance in a single sport in Olympic history. Thialf Stadium in Heerenveen was the second indoor 400m speed skating oval in the world, the first to host an international championship and remains a world-class facility today. Dutch speed skaters have won 77 world single distance championchips (since 1996)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which Dutch speed skater won more Olympic gold medals, Ireen Wüst or Sven Kramer?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Ireen Wüst"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Speed skating After a successful period around 1900, with Jaap Eden and Coen de Koning as World Champions, Dutch speed skating successes became numerous in the 1960s. Champions Kees Verkerk and Ard Schenk were immensely popular, causing a real speed skating hype in the country. Successes continue up to today, with the likes of Yvonne van Gennip (3 Olympic gold medals in 1988), Rintje Ritsma (4-time World Allround Champion), Jochem Uytdehaage (2 Olympic gold medals in 2002), Marianne Timmer (3 Olympic gold medals in 1998 and 2006), Ireen Wüst (5 Olympic golds in 2006, 2010, 2014, 2018 and 6 World Allround Speed Skating Championships) and Sven Kramer (4 Olympic gold medals in 2010, 2014, 2018 and 9 World Allround Championships). The Dutch speed skaters performance at the 2014 Winter Olympics, where they won 8 out of 12 events, 23 out of 36 medals, including 4 clean sweeps, is the most dominant performance in a single sport in Olympic history. Thialf Stadium in Heerenveen was the second indoor 400m speed skating oval in the world, the first to host an international championship and remains a world-class facility today. Dutch speed skaters have won 77 world single distance championchips (since 1996)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many more World Allround Championships did Sven Kramer win compared to Ireen Ireen Wüst?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "3"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Speed skating After a successful period around 1900, with Jaap Eden and Coen de Koning as World Champions, Dutch speed skating successes became numerous in the 1960s. Champions Kees Verkerk and Ard Schenk were immensely popular, causing a real speed skating hype in the country. Successes continue up to today, with the likes of Yvonne van Gennip (3 Olympic gold medals in 1988), Rintje Ritsma (4-time World Allround Champion), Jochem Uytdehaage (2 Olympic gold medals in 2002), Marianne Timmer (3 Olympic gold medals in 1998 and 2006), Ireen Wüst (5 Olympic golds in 2006, 2010, 2014, 2018 and 6 World Allround Speed Skating Championships) and Sven Kramer (4 Olympic gold medals in 2010, 2014, 2018 and 9 World Allround Championships). The Dutch speed skaters performance at the 2014 Winter Olympics, where they won 8 out of 12 events, 23 out of 36 medals, including 4 clean sweeps, is the most dominant performance in a single sport in Olympic history. Thialf Stadium in Heerenveen was the second indoor 400m speed skating oval in the world, the first to host an international championship and remains a world-class facility today. Dutch speed skaters have won 77 world single distance championchips (since 1996)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many Olympics did Ireen Wüst compete in winning 5 golds?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "4"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Speed skating After a successful period around 1900, with Jaap Eden and Coen de Koning as World Champions, Dutch speed skating successes became numerous in the 1960s. Champions Kees Verkerk and Ard Schenk were immensely popular, causing a real speed skating hype in the country. Successes continue up to today, with the likes of Yvonne van Gennip (3 Olympic gold medals in 1988), Rintje Ritsma (4-time World Allround Champion), Jochem Uytdehaage (2 Olympic gold medals in 2002), Marianne Timmer (3 Olympic gold medals in 1998 and 2006), Ireen Wüst (5 Olympic golds in 2006, 2010, 2014, 2018 and 6 World Allround Speed Skating Championships) and Sven Kramer (4 Olympic gold medals in 2010, 2014, 2018 and 9 World Allround Championships). The Dutch speed skaters performance at the 2014 Winter Olympics, where they won 8 out of 12 events, 23 out of 36 medals, including 4 clean sweeps, is the most dominant performance in a single sport in Olympic history. Thialf Stadium in Heerenveen was the second indoor 400m speed skating oval in the world, the first to host an international championship and remains a world-class facility today. Dutch speed skaters have won 77 world single distance championchips (since 1996)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many years were between the first Olympic gold Ireen Wüst won and the most recent Olympic gold that she won?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "12"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Speed skating After a successful period around 1900, with Jaap Eden and Coen de Koning as World Champions, Dutch speed skating successes became numerous in the 1960s. Champions Kees Verkerk and Ard Schenk were immensely popular, causing a real speed skating hype in the country. Successes continue up to today, with the likes of Yvonne van Gennip (3 Olympic gold medals in 1988), Rintje Ritsma (4-time World Allround Champion), Jochem Uytdehaage (2 Olympic gold medals in 2002), Marianne Timmer (3 Olympic gold medals in 1998 and 2006), Ireen Wüst (5 Olympic golds in 2006, 2010, 2014, 2018 and 6 World Allround Speed Skating Championships) and Sven Kramer (4 Olympic gold medals in 2010, 2014, 2018 and 9 World Allround Championships). The Dutch speed skaters performance at the 2014 Winter Olympics, where they won 8 out of 12 events, 23 out of 36 medals, including 4 clean sweeps, is the most dominant performance in a single sport in Olympic history. Thialf Stadium in Heerenveen was the second indoor 400m speed skating oval in the world, the first to host an international championship and remains a world-class facility today. Dutch speed skaters have won 77 world single distance championchips (since 1996)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many more gold medals did Ireen Wüst win in 2010 than Sven Kramer?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "1"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Speed skating After a successful period around 1900, with Jaap Eden and Coen de Koning as World Champions, Dutch speed skating successes became numerous in the 1960s. Champions Kees Verkerk and Ard Schenk were immensely popular, causing a real speed skating hype in the country. Successes continue up to today, with the likes of Yvonne van Gennip (3 Olympic gold medals in 1988), Rintje Ritsma (4-time World Allround Champion), Jochem Uytdehaage (2 Olympic gold medals in 2002), Marianne Timmer (3 Olympic gold medals in 1998 and 2006), Ireen Wüst (5 Olympic golds in 2006, 2010, 2014, 2018 and 6 World Allround Speed Skating Championships) and Sven Kramer (4 Olympic gold medals in 2010, 2014, 2018 and 9 World Allround Championships). The Dutch speed skaters performance at the 2014 Winter Olympics, where they won 8 out of 12 events, 23 out of 36 medals, including 4 clean sweeps, is the most dominant performance in a single sport in Olympic history. Thialf Stadium in Heerenveen was the second indoor 400m speed skating oval in the world, the first to host an international championship and remains a world-class facility today. Dutch speed skaters have won 77 world single distance championchips (since 1996)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many of the 36 medals in the 2014 Winter Olympics did the Dutch not win?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "13"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Speed skating After a successful period around 1900, with Jaap Eden and Coen de Koning as World Champions, Dutch speed skating successes became numerous in the 1960s. Champions Kees Verkerk and Ard Schenk were immensely popular, causing a real speed skating hype in the country. Successes continue up to today, with the likes of Yvonne van Gennip (3 Olympic gold medals in 1988), Rintje Ritsma (4-time World Allround Champion), Jochem Uytdehaage (2 Olympic gold medals in 2002), Marianne Timmer (3 Olympic gold medals in 1998 and 2006), Ireen Wüst (5 Olympic golds in 2006, 2010, 2014, 2018 and 6 World Allround Speed Skating Championships) and Sven Kramer (4 Olympic gold medals in 2010, 2014, 2018 and 9 World Allround Championships). The Dutch speed skaters performance at the 2014 Winter Olympics, where they won 8 out of 12 events, 23 out of 36 medals, including 4 clean sweeps, is the most dominant performance in a single sport in Olympic history. Thialf Stadium in Heerenveen was the second indoor 400m speed skating oval in the world, the first to host an international championship and remains a world-class facility today. Dutch speed skaters have won 77 world single distance championchips (since 1996)."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many more Wold Allround Championships did Sven Kramer win than Rintje Ritsma?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "5"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Hoping to snap a four-game losing streak, the 49ers stayed at home for a Week 10 Thursday night duel with the Chicago Bears, as head coach Mike Singletary prepared to face his former team. After a scoreless first quarter, San Francisco would strike in the second quarter with a 14-yard touchdown run from running back Frank Gore. The Bears would close out the half with kicker Robbie Gould getting a 50-yard field goal. Chicago would creep closer in the third quarter as Gould nailed a 38-yard field goal. Afterwards, the Niners would add onto their lead as kicker Joe Nedney booted a 21-yard field goal. The Bears would get a comeback drive going as they got inside San Francisco's redzone, yet safety Michael Lewis got the game-ending interception, which preserved the four-point lead. With their four-game losing streak snapped, the 49ers improved to 4-5."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many is the difference in the yards of the TD run by Gore and the yards of the first field goal made by Gould?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "36"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Hoping to snap a four-game losing streak, the 49ers stayed at home for a Week 10 Thursday night duel with the Chicago Bears, as head coach Mike Singletary prepared to face his former team. After a scoreless first quarter, San Francisco would strike in the second quarter with a 14-yard touchdown run from running back Frank Gore. The Bears would close out the half with kicker Robbie Gould getting a 50-yard field goal. Chicago would creep closer in the third quarter as Gould nailed a 38-yard field goal. Afterwards, the Niners would add onto their lead as kicker Joe Nedney booted a 21-yard field goal. The Bears would get a comeback drive going as they got inside San Francisco's redzone, yet safety Michael Lewis got the game-ending interception, which preserved the four-point lead. With their four-game losing streak snapped, the 49ers improved to 4-5."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many is the difference in the yards of the TD run by Gore and the yards of the second field Goal made by Gould?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "24"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Hoping to snap a four-game losing streak, the 49ers stayed at home for a Week 10 Thursday night duel with the Chicago Bears, as head coach Mike Singletary prepared to face his former team. After a scoreless first quarter, San Francisco would strike in the second quarter with a 14-yard touchdown run from running back Frank Gore. The Bears would close out the half with kicker Robbie Gould getting a 50-yard field goal. Chicago would creep closer in the third quarter as Gould nailed a 38-yard field goal. Afterwards, the Niners would add onto their lead as kicker Joe Nedney booted a 21-yard field goal. The Bears would get a comeback drive going as they got inside San Francisco's redzone, yet safety Michael Lewis got the game-ending interception, which preserved the four-point lead. With their four-game losing streak snapped, the 49ers improved to 4-5."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many is the difference in the yards of the TD run by Gore and the yards of the field goal made by Nedney?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "7"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Hoping to snap a four-game losing streak, the 49ers stayed at home for a Week 10 Thursday night duel with the Chicago Bears, as head coach Mike Singletary prepared to face his former team. After a scoreless first quarter, San Francisco would strike in the second quarter with a 14-yard touchdown run from running back Frank Gore. The Bears would close out the half with kicker Robbie Gould getting a 50-yard field goal. Chicago would creep closer in the third quarter as Gould nailed a 38-yard field goal. Afterwards, the Niners would add onto their lead as kicker Joe Nedney booted a 21-yard field goal. The Bears would get a comeback drive going as they got inside San Francisco's redzone, yet safety Michael Lewis got the game-ending interception, which preserved the four-point lead. With their four-game losing streak snapped, the 49ers improved to 4-5."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many is the difference in the yards of the first field goal made by Gould and the yards of the second field goal made by Gould?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "12"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Hoping to snap a four-game losing streak, the 49ers stayed at home for a Week 10 Thursday night duel with the Chicago Bears, as head coach Mike Singletary prepared to face his former team. After a scoreless first quarter, San Francisco would strike in the second quarter with a 14-yard touchdown run from running back Frank Gore. The Bears would close out the half with kicker Robbie Gould getting a 50-yard field goal. Chicago would creep closer in the third quarter as Gould nailed a 38-yard field goal. Afterwards, the Niners would add onto their lead as kicker Joe Nedney booted a 21-yard field goal. The Bears would get a comeback drive going as they got inside San Francisco's redzone, yet safety Michael Lewis got the game-ending interception, which preserved the four-point lead. With their four-game losing streak snapped, the 49ers improved to 4-5."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many is the difference in the first field goal made by Gould and the yards of the field goal made by Nedney?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "29"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Coming off their thrilling overtime road win over the Redskins, the Cowboys went home, donned their throwback uniforms, and played a Week 12 interconference duel with the Miami Dolphins in the annual Thanksgiving game. Dallas trailed early in the first quarter with Dolphins kicker Shayne Graham getting a 26-yard field goal, yet the Cowboys would answer in the second quarter with a 26-yard field goal from kicker Dan Bailey, followed by quarterback Tony Romo finding wide receiver Laurent Robinson on a 5-yard touchdown pass. Miami would close out the half with Graham making a 28-yard field goal. The Dolphins retook the lead in the third quarter with Graham booting a 27-yard field goal, followed by quarterback Matt Moore completing a 35-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Brandon Marshall. Afterwards, Dallas regained the lead in the fourth quarter with Romo connecting with Robinson again on an 18-yard touchdown pass. Miami struck back with Graham making a 23-yard field goal, but Bailey rescued the Cowboys by nailing the winning 28-yard field goal. Bailey (2/2 on field goal, including game-winning 28-yarder) and linebacker DeMarcus Ware (1 assist & a fumble recovery) were named NFL on CBS' All-Iron Award winners."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Who got 2 out of 2 field goals?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Dan Baile"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Coming off their thrilling overtime road win over the Redskins, the Cowboys went home, donned their throwback uniforms, and played a Week 12 interconference duel with the Miami Dolphins in the annual Thanksgiving game. Dallas trailed early in the first quarter with Dolphins kicker Shayne Graham getting a 26-yard field goal, yet the Cowboys would answer in the second quarter with a 26-yard field goal from kicker Dan Bailey, followed by quarterback Tony Romo finding wide receiver Laurent Robinson on a 5-yard touchdown pass. Miami would close out the half with Graham making a 28-yard field goal. The Dolphins retook the lead in the third quarter with Graham booting a 27-yard field goal, followed by quarterback Matt Moore completing a 35-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Brandon Marshall. Afterwards, Dallas regained the lead in the fourth quarter with Romo connecting with Robinson again on an 18-yard touchdown pass. Miami struck back with Graham making a 23-yard field goal, but Bailey rescued the Cowboys by nailing the winning 28-yard field goal. Bailey (2/2 on field goal, including game-winning 28-yarder) and linebacker DeMarcus Ware (1 assist & a fumble recovery) were named NFL on CBS' All-Iron Award winners."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many yards did Tony Romo throw the ball for a touchdown?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "5"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Coming off their thrilling overtime road win over the Redskins, the Cowboys went home, donned their throwback uniforms, and played a Week 12 interconference duel with the Miami Dolphins in the annual Thanksgiving game. Dallas trailed early in the first quarter with Dolphins kicker Shayne Graham getting a 26-yard field goal, yet the Cowboys would answer in the second quarter with a 26-yard field goal from kicker Dan Bailey, followed by quarterback Tony Romo finding wide receiver Laurent Robinson on a 5-yard touchdown pass. Miami would close out the half with Graham making a 28-yard field goal. The Dolphins retook the lead in the third quarter with Graham booting a 27-yard field goal, followed by quarterback Matt Moore completing a 35-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Brandon Marshall. Afterwards, Dallas regained the lead in the fourth quarter with Romo connecting with Robinson again on an 18-yard touchdown pass. Miami struck back with Graham making a 23-yard field goal, but Bailey rescued the Cowboys by nailing the winning 28-yard field goal. Bailey (2/2 on field goal, including game-winning 28-yarder) and linebacker DeMarcus Ware (1 assist & a fumble recovery) were named NFL on CBS' All-Iron Award winners."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which team beat the Redskins in week 11?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Cowboys"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Coming off their thrilling overtime road win over the Redskins, the Cowboys went home, donned their throwback uniforms, and played a Week 12 interconference duel with the Miami Dolphins in the annual Thanksgiving game. Dallas trailed early in the first quarter with Dolphins kicker Shayne Graham getting a 26-yard field goal, yet the Cowboys would answer in the second quarter with a 26-yard field goal from kicker Dan Bailey, followed by quarterback Tony Romo finding wide receiver Laurent Robinson on a 5-yard touchdown pass. Miami would close out the half with Graham making a 28-yard field goal. The Dolphins retook the lead in the third quarter with Graham booting a 27-yard field goal, followed by quarterback Matt Moore completing a 35-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Brandon Marshall. Afterwards, Dallas regained the lead in the fourth quarter with Romo connecting with Robinson again on an 18-yard touchdown pass. Miami struck back with Graham making a 23-yard field goal, but Bailey rescued the Cowboys by nailing the winning 28-yard field goal. Bailey (2/2 on field goal, including game-winning 28-yarder) and linebacker DeMarcus Ware (1 assist & a fumble recovery) were named NFL on CBS' All-Iron Award winners."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many field goals were scored in the first quarter?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "1"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Coming off their thrilling overtime road win over the Redskins, the Cowboys went home, donned their throwback uniforms, and played a Week 12 interconference duel with the Miami Dolphins in the annual Thanksgiving game. Dallas trailed early in the first quarter with Dolphins kicker Shayne Graham getting a 26-yard field goal, yet the Cowboys would answer in the second quarter with a 26-yard field goal from kicker Dan Bailey, followed by quarterback Tony Romo finding wide receiver Laurent Robinson on a 5-yard touchdown pass. Miami would close out the half with Graham making a 28-yard field goal. The Dolphins retook the lead in the third quarter with Graham booting a 27-yard field goal, followed by quarterback Matt Moore completing a 35-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Brandon Marshall. Afterwards, Dallas regained the lead in the fourth quarter with Romo connecting with Robinson again on an 18-yard touchdown pass. Miami struck back with Graham making a 23-yard field goal, but Bailey rescued the Cowboys by nailing the winning 28-yard field goal. Bailey (2/2 on field goal, including game-winning 28-yarder) and linebacker DeMarcus Ware (1 assist & a fumble recovery) were named NFL on CBS' All-Iron Award winners."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many field goals were made in the game?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "6"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Coming off their thrilling overtime road win over the Redskins, the Cowboys went home, donned their throwback uniforms, and played a Week 12 interconference duel with the Miami Dolphins in the annual Thanksgiving game. Dallas trailed early in the first quarter with Dolphins kicker Shayne Graham getting a 26-yard field goal, yet the Cowboys would answer in the second quarter with a 26-yard field goal from kicker Dan Bailey, followed by quarterback Tony Romo finding wide receiver Laurent Robinson on a 5-yard touchdown pass. Miami would close out the half with Graham making a 28-yard field goal. The Dolphins retook the lead in the third quarter with Graham booting a 27-yard field goal, followed by quarterback Matt Moore completing a 35-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Brandon Marshall. Afterwards, Dallas regained the lead in the fourth quarter with Romo connecting with Robinson again on an 18-yard touchdown pass. Miami struck back with Graham making a 23-yard field goal, but Bailey rescued the Cowboys by nailing the winning 28-yard field goal. Bailey (2/2 on field goal, including game-winning 28-yarder) and linebacker DeMarcus Ware (1 assist & a fumble recovery) were named NFL on CBS' All-Iron Award winners."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many touchdown passes were thrown in the game?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "3"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Coming off their thrilling overtime road win over the Redskins, the Cowboys went home, donned their throwback uniforms, and played a Week 12 interconference duel with the Miami Dolphins in the annual Thanksgiving game. Dallas trailed early in the first quarter with Dolphins kicker Shayne Graham getting a 26-yard field goal, yet the Cowboys would answer in the second quarter with a 26-yard field goal from kicker Dan Bailey, followed by quarterback Tony Romo finding wide receiver Laurent Robinson on a 5-yard touchdown pass. Miami would close out the half with Graham making a 28-yard field goal. The Dolphins retook the lead in the third quarter with Graham booting a 27-yard field goal, followed by quarterback Matt Moore completing a 35-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Brandon Marshall. Afterwards, Dallas regained the lead in the fourth quarter with Romo connecting with Robinson again on an 18-yard touchdown pass. Miami struck back with Graham making a 23-yard field goal, but Bailey rescued the Cowboys by nailing the winning 28-yard field goal. Bailey (2/2 on field goal, including game-winning 28-yarder) and linebacker DeMarcus Ware (1 assist & a fumble recovery) were named NFL on CBS' All-Iron Award winners."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many more field goals did Graham boot than Bailey?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "2"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Coming off their thrilling overtime road win over the Redskins, the Cowboys went home, donned their throwback uniforms, and played a Week 12 interconference duel with the Miami Dolphins in the annual Thanksgiving game. Dallas trailed early in the first quarter with Dolphins kicker Shayne Graham getting a 26-yard field goal, yet the Cowboys would answer in the second quarter with a 26-yard field goal from kicker Dan Bailey, followed by quarterback Tony Romo finding wide receiver Laurent Robinson on a 5-yard touchdown pass. Miami would close out the half with Graham making a 28-yard field goal. The Dolphins retook the lead in the third quarter with Graham booting a 27-yard field goal, followed by quarterback Matt Moore completing a 35-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Brandon Marshall. Afterwards, Dallas regained the lead in the fourth quarter with Romo connecting with Robinson again on an 18-yard touchdown pass. Miami struck back with Graham making a 23-yard field goal, but Bailey rescued the Cowboys by nailing the winning 28-yard field goal. Bailey (2/2 on field goal, including game-winning 28-yarder) and linebacker DeMarcus Ware (1 assist & a fumble recovery) were named NFL on CBS' All-Iron Award winners."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Who kicked the least numbers of field goals?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Dan Bailey"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Coming off their thrilling overtime road win over the Redskins, the Cowboys went home, donned their throwback uniforms, and played a Week 12 interconference duel with the Miami Dolphins in the annual Thanksgiving game. Dallas trailed early in the first quarter with Dolphins kicker Shayne Graham getting a 26-yard field goal, yet the Cowboys would answer in the second quarter with a 26-yard field goal from kicker Dan Bailey, followed by quarterback Tony Romo finding wide receiver Laurent Robinson on a 5-yard touchdown pass. Miami would close out the half with Graham making a 28-yard field goal. The Dolphins retook the lead in the third quarter with Graham booting a 27-yard field goal, followed by quarterback Matt Moore completing a 35-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Brandon Marshall. Afterwards, Dallas regained the lead in the fourth quarter with Romo connecting with Robinson again on an 18-yard touchdown pass. Miami struck back with Graham making a 23-yard field goal, but Bailey rescued the Cowboys by nailing the winning 28-yard field goal. Bailey (2/2 on field goal, including game-winning 28-yarder) and linebacker DeMarcus Ware (1 assist & a fumble recovery) were named NFL on CBS' All-Iron Award winners."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many field goals over 25 yards were scored?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "5"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Coming off their thrilling overtime road win over the Redskins, the Cowboys went home, donned their throwback uniforms, and played a Week 12 interconference duel with the Miami Dolphins in the annual Thanksgiving game. Dallas trailed early in the first quarter with Dolphins kicker Shayne Graham getting a 26-yard field goal, yet the Cowboys would answer in the second quarter with a 26-yard field goal from kicker Dan Bailey, followed by quarterback Tony Romo finding wide receiver Laurent Robinson on a 5-yard touchdown pass. Miami would close out the half with Graham making a 28-yard field goal. The Dolphins retook the lead in the third quarter with Graham booting a 27-yard field goal, followed by quarterback Matt Moore completing a 35-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Brandon Marshall. Afterwards, Dallas regained the lead in the fourth quarter with Romo connecting with Robinson again on an 18-yard touchdown pass. Miami struck back with Graham making a 23-yard field goal, but Bailey rescued the Cowboys by nailing the winning 28-yard field goal. Bailey (2/2 on field goal, including game-winning 28-yarder) and linebacker DeMarcus Ware (1 assist & a fumble recovery) were named NFL on CBS' All-Iron Award winners."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many field goals between 20 and 25 yards were scored?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "1"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Coming off their thrilling overtime road win over the Redskins, the Cowboys went home, donned their throwback uniforms, and played a Week 12 interconference duel with the Miami Dolphins in the annual Thanksgiving game. Dallas trailed early in the first quarter with Dolphins kicker Shayne Graham getting a 26-yard field goal, yet the Cowboys would answer in the second quarter with a 26-yard field goal from kicker Dan Bailey, followed by quarterback Tony Romo finding wide receiver Laurent Robinson on a 5-yard touchdown pass. Miami would close out the half with Graham making a 28-yard field goal. The Dolphins retook the lead in the third quarter with Graham booting a 27-yard field goal, followed by quarterback Matt Moore completing a 35-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Brandon Marshall. Afterwards, Dallas regained the lead in the fourth quarter with Romo connecting with Robinson again on an 18-yard touchdown pass. Miami struck back with Graham making a 23-yard field goal, but Bailey rescued the Cowboys by nailing the winning 28-yard field goal. Bailey (2/2 on field goal, including game-winning 28-yarder) and linebacker DeMarcus Ware (1 assist & a fumble recovery) were named NFL on CBS' All-Iron Award winners."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many field goals over 26 yards did Graham kick?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "2"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Coming off their thrilling overtime road win over the Redskins, the Cowboys went home, donned their throwback uniforms, and played a Week 12 interconference duel with the Miami Dolphins in the annual Thanksgiving game. Dallas trailed early in the first quarter with Dolphins kicker Shayne Graham getting a 26-yard field goal, yet the Cowboys would answer in the second quarter with a 26-yard field goal from kicker Dan Bailey, followed by quarterback Tony Romo finding wide receiver Laurent Robinson on a 5-yard touchdown pass. Miami would close out the half with Graham making a 28-yard field goal. The Dolphins retook the lead in the third quarter with Graham booting a 27-yard field goal, followed by quarterback Matt Moore completing a 35-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Brandon Marshall. Afterwards, Dallas regained the lead in the fourth quarter with Romo connecting with Robinson again on an 18-yard touchdown pass. Miami struck back with Graham making a 23-yard field goal, but Bailey rescued the Cowboys by nailing the winning 28-yard field goal. Bailey (2/2 on field goal, including game-winning 28-yarder) and linebacker DeMarcus Ware (1 assist & a fumble recovery) were named NFL on CBS' All-Iron Award winners."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many field goals did Shayne Graham kick in the game?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "4"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Coming off their thrilling overtime road win over the Redskins, the Cowboys went home, donned their throwback uniforms, and played a Week 12 interconference duel with the Miami Dolphins in the annual Thanksgiving game. Dallas trailed early in the first quarter with Dolphins kicker Shayne Graham getting a 26-yard field goal, yet the Cowboys would answer in the second quarter with a 26-yard field goal from kicker Dan Bailey, followed by quarterback Tony Romo finding wide receiver Laurent Robinson on a 5-yard touchdown pass. Miami would close out the half with Graham making a 28-yard field goal. The Dolphins retook the lead in the third quarter with Graham booting a 27-yard field goal, followed by quarterback Matt Moore completing a 35-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Brandon Marshall. Afterwards, Dallas regained the lead in the fourth quarter with Romo connecting with Robinson again on an 18-yard touchdown pass. Miami struck back with Graham making a 23-yard field goal, but Bailey rescued the Cowboys by nailing the winning 28-yard field goal. Bailey (2/2 on field goal, including game-winning 28-yarder) and linebacker DeMarcus Ware (1 assist & a fumble recovery) were named NFL on CBS' All-Iron Award winners."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many yards was Shayne Graham's shortest field goal?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "23"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Coming off their thrilling overtime road win over the Redskins, the Cowboys went home, donned their throwback uniforms, and played a Week 12 interconference duel with the Miami Dolphins in the annual Thanksgiving game. Dallas trailed early in the first quarter with Dolphins kicker Shayne Graham getting a 26-yard field goal, yet the Cowboys would answer in the second quarter with a 26-yard field goal from kicker Dan Bailey, followed by quarterback Tony Romo finding wide receiver Laurent Robinson on a 5-yard touchdown pass. Miami would close out the half with Graham making a 28-yard field goal. The Dolphins retook the lead in the third quarter with Graham booting a 27-yard field goal, followed by quarterback Matt Moore completing a 35-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Brandon Marshall. Afterwards, Dallas regained the lead in the fourth quarter with Romo connecting with Robinson again on an 18-yard touchdown pass. Miami struck back with Graham making a 23-yard field goal, but Bailey rescued the Cowboys by nailing the winning 28-yard field goal. Bailey (2/2 on field goal, including game-winning 28-yarder) and linebacker DeMarcus Ware (1 assist & a fumble recovery) were named NFL on CBS' All-Iron Award winners."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many yards longer was Shayne Graham's longest field goal than his shortest?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "5"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Coming off their thrilling overtime road win over the Redskins, the Cowboys went home, donned their throwback uniforms, and played a Week 12 interconference duel with the Miami Dolphins in the annual Thanksgiving game. Dallas trailed early in the first quarter with Dolphins kicker Shayne Graham getting a 26-yard field goal, yet the Cowboys would answer in the second quarter with a 26-yard field goal from kicker Dan Bailey, followed by quarterback Tony Romo finding wide receiver Laurent Robinson on a 5-yard touchdown pass. Miami would close out the half with Graham making a 28-yard field goal. The Dolphins retook the lead in the third quarter with Graham booting a 27-yard field goal, followed by quarterback Matt Moore completing a 35-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Brandon Marshall. Afterwards, Dallas regained the lead in the fourth quarter with Romo connecting with Robinson again on an 18-yard touchdown pass. Miami struck back with Graham making a 23-yard field goal, but Bailey rescued the Cowboys by nailing the winning 28-yard field goal. Bailey (2/2 on field goal, including game-winning 28-yarder) and linebacker DeMarcus Ware (1 assist & a fumble recovery) were named NFL on CBS' All-Iron Award winners."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many total yards did Laurent Robinson have on touchdown receptions?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "23"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Coming off their thrilling overtime road win over the Redskins, the Cowboys went home, donned their throwback uniforms, and played a Week 12 interconference duel with the Miami Dolphins in the annual Thanksgiving game. Dallas trailed early in the first quarter with Dolphins kicker Shayne Graham getting a 26-yard field goal, yet the Cowboys would answer in the second quarter with a 26-yard field goal from kicker Dan Bailey, followed by quarterback Tony Romo finding wide receiver Laurent Robinson on a 5-yard touchdown pass. Miami would close out the half with Graham making a 28-yard field goal. The Dolphins retook the lead in the third quarter with Graham booting a 27-yard field goal, followed by quarterback Matt Moore completing a 35-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Brandon Marshall. Afterwards, Dallas regained the lead in the fourth quarter with Romo connecting with Robinson again on an 18-yard touchdown pass. Miami struck back with Graham making a 23-yard field goal, but Bailey rescued the Cowboys by nailing the winning 28-yard field goal. Bailey (2/2 on field goal, including game-winning 28-yarder) and linebacker DeMarcus Ware (1 assist & a fumble recovery) were named NFL on CBS' All-Iron Award winners."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Who threw the second longest touchdown pass?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Tony Romo"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Coming off their thrilling overtime road win over the Redskins, the Cowboys went home, donned their throwback uniforms, and played a Week 12 interconference duel with the Miami Dolphins in the annual Thanksgiving game. Dallas trailed early in the first quarter with Dolphins kicker Shayne Graham getting a 26-yard field goal, yet the Cowboys would answer in the second quarter with a 26-yard field goal from kicker Dan Bailey, followed by quarterback Tony Romo finding wide receiver Laurent Robinson on a 5-yard touchdown pass. Miami would close out the half with Graham making a 28-yard field goal. The Dolphins retook the lead in the third quarter with Graham booting a 27-yard field goal, followed by quarterback Matt Moore completing a 35-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Brandon Marshall. Afterwards, Dallas regained the lead in the fourth quarter with Romo connecting with Robinson again on an 18-yard touchdown pass. Miami struck back with Graham making a 23-yard field goal, but Bailey rescued the Cowboys by nailing the winning 28-yard field goal. Bailey (2/2 on field goal, including game-winning 28-yarder) and linebacker DeMarcus Ware (1 assist & a fumble recovery) were named NFL on CBS' All-Iron Award winners."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many yards longer was Laurent Robinsons second touchdown over his first one?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "13"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Coming off their thrilling overtime road win over the Redskins, the Cowboys went home, donned their throwback uniforms, and played a Week 12 interconference duel with the Miami Dolphins in the annual Thanksgiving game. Dallas trailed early in the first quarter with Dolphins kicker Shayne Graham getting a 26-yard field goal, yet the Cowboys would answer in the second quarter with a 26-yard field goal from kicker Dan Bailey, followed by quarterback Tony Romo finding wide receiver Laurent Robinson on a 5-yard touchdown pass. Miami would close out the half with Graham making a 28-yard field goal. The Dolphins retook the lead in the third quarter with Graham booting a 27-yard field goal, followed by quarterback Matt Moore completing a 35-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Brandon Marshall. Afterwards, Dallas regained the lead in the fourth quarter with Romo connecting with Robinson again on an 18-yard touchdown pass. Miami struck back with Graham making a 23-yard field goal, but Bailey rescued the Cowboys by nailing the winning 28-yard field goal. Bailey (2/2 on field goal, including game-winning 28-yarder) and linebacker DeMarcus Ware (1 assist & a fumble recovery) were named NFL on CBS' All-Iron Award winners."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many total yards of field goals did Dan Bailey make?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "54"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "60 Razvedupr officers were dispatched to Tallinn in the spring of 1924 to organise an uprising. The plan for was hatched by Jaan Anvelt and Karl Rimm. The latter was a veteran of the Russian Civil War. The plan envisaged the main attack aimed at Tallinn, with subsequent coups in Tartu, Narva, Pärnu, Viljandi, Rakvere, Kunda, and Kohila. The revolt was supposed to start at 5:15 a.m. The 279 communists, mostly infiltrated from the Soviet Union, were armed with 5 Thompson light machine guns, 55 rifles, 65 hand grenades, 8 explosive devices and 150 pistols. It was mistakenly expected that the workers and soldiers would join the insurgency and would seize power in the capital together. The plan called for the establishment of an Estonian Soviet Socialist Republic and of a \"working people's government\". Most of the schemes were spoiled by the Trial of the 149 in November 1924, which eliminated many potential communist organisers. The gunmen's first priority was to take over the Estonian National Defence College based in the Tondi suburb south of the city centre, the main narrow gauge railway station in Tallinn-Väike, and a battalion of engineering troops in Nõmme."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many weapons were the Soviet Union armed when carrying 5 Thompson light machine guns, 55 rifles, 65 hand grenades, 8 explosive devices and 150 pistols?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "283"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "60 Razvedupr officers were dispatched to Tallinn in the spring of 1924 to organise an uprising. The plan for was hatched by Jaan Anvelt and Karl Rimm. The latter was a veteran of the Russian Civil War. The plan envisaged the main attack aimed at Tallinn, with subsequent coups in Tartu, Narva, Pärnu, Viljandi, Rakvere, Kunda, and Kohila. The revolt was supposed to start at 5:15 a.m. The 279 communists, mostly infiltrated from the Soviet Union, were armed with 5 Thompson light machine guns, 55 rifles, 65 hand grenades, 8 explosive devices and 150 pistols. It was mistakenly expected that the workers and soldiers would join the insurgency and would seize power in the capital together. The plan called for the establishment of an Estonian Soviet Socialist Republic and of a \"working people's government\". Most of the schemes were spoiled by the Trial of the 149 in November 1924, which eliminated many potential communist organisers. The gunmen's first priority was to take over the Estonian National Defence College based in the Tondi suburb south of the city centre, the main narrow gauge railway station in Tallinn-Väike, and a battalion of engineering troops in Nõmme."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "What happened second, 60 Razvedupr officers getting dispatched to Tallinn or Trial of the 49?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Trial of the 149"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "60 Razvedupr officers were dispatched to Tallinn in the spring of 1924 to organise an uprising. The plan for was hatched by Jaan Anvelt and Karl Rimm. The latter was a veteran of the Russian Civil War. The plan envisaged the main attack aimed at Tallinn, with subsequent coups in Tartu, Narva, Pärnu, Viljandi, Rakvere, Kunda, and Kohila. The revolt was supposed to start at 5:15 a.m. The 279 communists, mostly infiltrated from the Soviet Union, were armed with 5 Thompson light machine guns, 55 rifles, 65 hand grenades, 8 explosive devices and 150 pistols. It was mistakenly expected that the workers and soldiers would join the insurgency and would seize power in the capital together. The plan called for the establishment of an Estonian Soviet Socialist Republic and of a \"working people's government\". Most of the schemes were spoiled by the Trial of the 149 in November 1924, which eliminated many potential communist organisers. The gunmen's first priority was to take over the Estonian National Defence College based in the Tondi suburb south of the city centre, the main narrow gauge railway station in Tallinn-Väike, and a battalion of engineering troops in Nõmme."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many subsequent coups took place after the attack at Tallinn?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "7"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "60 Razvedupr officers were dispatched to Tallinn in the spring of 1924 to organise an uprising. The plan for was hatched by Jaan Anvelt and Karl Rimm. The latter was a veteran of the Russian Civil War. The plan envisaged the main attack aimed at Tallinn, with subsequent coups in Tartu, Narva, Pärnu, Viljandi, Rakvere, Kunda, and Kohila. The revolt was supposed to start at 5:15 a.m. The 279 communists, mostly infiltrated from the Soviet Union, were armed with 5 Thompson light machine guns, 55 rifles, 65 hand grenades, 8 explosive devices and 150 pistols. It was mistakenly expected that the workers and soldiers would join the insurgency and would seize power in the capital together. The plan called for the establishment of an Estonian Soviet Socialist Republic and of a \"working people's government\". Most of the schemes were spoiled by the Trial of the 149 in November 1924, which eliminated many potential communist organisers. The gunmen's first priority was to take over the Estonian National Defence College based in the Tondi suburb south of the city centre, the main narrow gauge railway station in Tallinn-Väike, and a battalion of engineering troops in Nõmme."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many more hand grenades did the communists have than rifles?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "10"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "60 Razvedupr officers were dispatched to Tallinn in the spring of 1924 to organise an uprising. The plan for was hatched by Jaan Anvelt and Karl Rimm. The latter was a veteran of the Russian Civil War. The plan envisaged the main attack aimed at Tallinn, with subsequent coups in Tartu, Narva, Pärnu, Viljandi, Rakvere, Kunda, and Kohila. The revolt was supposed to start at 5:15 a.m. The 279 communists, mostly infiltrated from the Soviet Union, were armed with 5 Thompson light machine guns, 55 rifles, 65 hand grenades, 8 explosive devices and 150 pistols. It was mistakenly expected that the workers and soldiers would join the insurgency and would seize power in the capital together. The plan called for the establishment of an Estonian Soviet Socialist Republic and of a \"working people's government\". Most of the schemes were spoiled by the Trial of the 149 in November 1924, which eliminated many potential communist organisers. The gunmen's first priority was to take over the Estonian National Defence College based in the Tondi suburb south of the city centre, the main narrow gauge railway station in Tallinn-Väike, and a battalion of engineering troops in Nõmme."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many total guns were the 279 communists armed with?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "210"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "60 Razvedupr officers were dispatched to Tallinn in the spring of 1924 to organise an uprising. The plan for was hatched by Jaan Anvelt and Karl Rimm. The latter was a veteran of the Russian Civil War. The plan envisaged the main attack aimed at Tallinn, with subsequent coups in Tartu, Narva, Pärnu, Viljandi, Rakvere, Kunda, and Kohila. The revolt was supposed to start at 5:15 a.m. The 279 communists, mostly infiltrated from the Soviet Union, were armed with 5 Thompson light machine guns, 55 rifles, 65 hand grenades, 8 explosive devices and 150 pistols. It was mistakenly expected that the workers and soldiers would join the insurgency and would seize power in the capital together. The plan called for the establishment of an Estonian Soviet Socialist Republic and of a \"working people's government\". Most of the schemes were spoiled by the Trial of the 149 in November 1924, which eliminated many potential communist organisers. The gunmen's first priority was to take over the Estonian National Defence College based in the Tondi suburb south of the city centre, the main narrow gauge railway station in Tallinn-Väike, and a battalion of engineering troops in Nõmme."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "What was expected to join the insurgency with the soldiers and seize power in the capital?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "the workers"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "60 Razvedupr officers were dispatched to Tallinn in the spring of 1924 to organise an uprising. The plan for was hatched by Jaan Anvelt and Karl Rimm. The latter was a veteran of the Russian Civil War. The plan envisaged the main attack aimed at Tallinn, with subsequent coups in Tartu, Narva, Pärnu, Viljandi, Rakvere, Kunda, and Kohila. The revolt was supposed to start at 5:15 a.m. The 279 communists, mostly infiltrated from the Soviet Union, were armed with 5 Thompson light machine guns, 55 rifles, 65 hand grenades, 8 explosive devices and 150 pistols. It was mistakenly expected that the workers and soldiers would join the insurgency and would seize power in the capital together. The plan called for the establishment of an Estonian Soviet Socialist Republic and of a \"working people's government\". Most of the schemes were spoiled by the Trial of the 149 in November 1924, which eliminated many potential communist organisers. The gunmen's first priority was to take over the Estonian National Defence College based in the Tondi suburb south of the city centre, the main narrow gauge railway station in Tallinn-Väike, and a battalion of engineering troops in Nõmme."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many people hatched the plan?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "2"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "60 Razvedupr officers were dispatched to Tallinn in the spring of 1924 to organise an uprising. The plan for was hatched by Jaan Anvelt and Karl Rimm. The latter was a veteran of the Russian Civil War. The plan envisaged the main attack aimed at Tallinn, with subsequent coups in Tartu, Narva, Pärnu, Viljandi, Rakvere, Kunda, and Kohila. The revolt was supposed to start at 5:15 a.m. The 279 communists, mostly infiltrated from the Soviet Union, were armed with 5 Thompson light machine guns, 55 rifles, 65 hand grenades, 8 explosive devices and 150 pistols. It was mistakenly expected that the workers and soldiers would join the insurgency and would seize power in the capital together. The plan called for the establishment of an Estonian Soviet Socialist Republic and of a \"working people's government\". Most of the schemes were spoiled by the Trial of the 149 in November 1924, which eliminated many potential communist organisers. The gunmen's first priority was to take over the Estonian National Defence College based in the Tondi suburb south of the city centre, the main narrow gauge railway station in Tallinn-Väike, and a battalion of engineering troops in Nõmme."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Who was a veteran of the RUssian Civil War?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Karl Rimm"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "60 Razvedupr officers were dispatched to Tallinn in the spring of 1924 to organise an uprising. The plan for was hatched by Jaan Anvelt and Karl Rimm. The latter was a veteran of the Russian Civil War. The plan envisaged the main attack aimed at Tallinn, with subsequent coups in Tartu, Narva, Pärnu, Viljandi, Rakvere, Kunda, and Kohila. The revolt was supposed to start at 5:15 a.m. The 279 communists, mostly infiltrated from the Soviet Union, were armed with 5 Thompson light machine guns, 55 rifles, 65 hand grenades, 8 explosive devices and 150 pistols. It was mistakenly expected that the workers and soldiers would join the insurgency and would seize power in the capital together. The plan called for the establishment of an Estonian Soviet Socialist Republic and of a \"working people's government\". Most of the schemes were spoiled by the Trial of the 149 in November 1924, which eliminated many potential communist organisers. The gunmen's first priority was to take over the Estonian National Defence College based in the Tondi suburb south of the city centre, the main narrow gauge railway station in Tallinn-Väike, and a battalion of engineering troops in Nõmme."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many coups were planned after the attack at Tallinn?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "7"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "60 Razvedupr officers were dispatched to Tallinn in the spring of 1924 to organise an uprising. The plan for was hatched by Jaan Anvelt and Karl Rimm. The latter was a veteran of the Russian Civil War. The plan envisaged the main attack aimed at Tallinn, with subsequent coups in Tartu, Narva, Pärnu, Viljandi, Rakvere, Kunda, and Kohila. The revolt was supposed to start at 5:15 a.m. The 279 communists, mostly infiltrated from the Soviet Union, were armed with 5 Thompson light machine guns, 55 rifles, 65 hand grenades, 8 explosive devices and 150 pistols. It was mistakenly expected that the workers and soldiers would join the insurgency and would seize power in the capital together. The plan called for the establishment of an Estonian Soviet Socialist Republic and of a \"working people's government\". Most of the schemes were spoiled by the Trial of the 149 in November 1924, which eliminated many potential communist organisers. The gunmen's first priority was to take over the Estonian National Defence College based in the Tondi suburb south of the city centre, the main narrow gauge railway station in Tallinn-Väike, and a battalion of engineering troops in Nõmme."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Did the communists have more light machine guns or rifles?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "rifles"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "60 Razvedupr officers were dispatched to Tallinn in the spring of 1924 to organise an uprising. The plan for was hatched by Jaan Anvelt and Karl Rimm. The latter was a veteran of the Russian Civil War. The plan envisaged the main attack aimed at Tallinn, with subsequent coups in Tartu, Narva, Pärnu, Viljandi, Rakvere, Kunda, and Kohila. The revolt was supposed to start at 5:15 a.m. The 279 communists, mostly infiltrated from the Soviet Union, were armed with 5 Thompson light machine guns, 55 rifles, 65 hand grenades, 8 explosive devices and 150 pistols. It was mistakenly expected that the workers and soldiers would join the insurgency and would seize power in the capital together. The plan called for the establishment of an Estonian Soviet Socialist Republic and of a \"working people's government\". Most of the schemes were spoiled by the Trial of the 149 in November 1924, which eliminated many potential communist organisers. The gunmen's first priority was to take over the Estonian National Defence College based in the Tondi suburb south of the city centre, the main narrow gauge railway station in Tallinn-Väike, and a battalion of engineering troops in Nõmme."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many more rifles than machine guns did the communists have?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "50"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "60 Razvedupr officers were dispatched to Tallinn in the spring of 1924 to organise an uprising. The plan for was hatched by Jaan Anvelt and Karl Rimm. The latter was a veteran of the Russian Civil War. The plan envisaged the main attack aimed at Tallinn, with subsequent coups in Tartu, Narva, Pärnu, Viljandi, Rakvere, Kunda, and Kohila. The revolt was supposed to start at 5:15 a.m. The 279 communists, mostly infiltrated from the Soviet Union, were armed with 5 Thompson light machine guns, 55 rifles, 65 hand grenades, 8 explosive devices and 150 pistols. It was mistakenly expected that the workers and soldiers would join the insurgency and would seize power in the capital together. The plan called for the establishment of an Estonian Soviet Socialist Republic and of a \"working people's government\". Most of the schemes were spoiled by the Trial of the 149 in November 1924, which eliminated many potential communist organisers. The gunmen's first priority was to take over the Estonian National Defence College based in the Tondi suburb south of the city centre, the main narrow gauge railway station in Tallinn-Väike, and a battalion of engineering troops in Nõmme."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Did the communists have more rifles or hand grenades?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "hand grenades"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "60 Razvedupr officers were dispatched to Tallinn in the spring of 1924 to organise an uprising. The plan for was hatched by Jaan Anvelt and Karl Rimm. The latter was a veteran of the Russian Civil War. The plan envisaged the main attack aimed at Tallinn, with subsequent coups in Tartu, Narva, Pärnu, Viljandi, Rakvere, Kunda, and Kohila. The revolt was supposed to start at 5:15 a.m. The 279 communists, mostly infiltrated from the Soviet Union, were armed with 5 Thompson light machine guns, 55 rifles, 65 hand grenades, 8 explosive devices and 150 pistols. It was mistakenly expected that the workers and soldiers would join the insurgency and would seize power in the capital together. The plan called for the establishment of an Estonian Soviet Socialist Republic and of a \"working people's government\". Most of the schemes were spoiled by the Trial of the 149 in November 1924, which eliminated many potential communist organisers. The gunmen's first priority was to take over the Estonian National Defence College based in the Tondi suburb south of the city centre, the main narrow gauge railway station in Tallinn-Väike, and a battalion of engineering troops in Nõmme."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many more hand grenades than rifles did the communists have?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "10"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "60 Razvedupr officers were dispatched to Tallinn in the spring of 1924 to organise an uprising. The plan for was hatched by Jaan Anvelt and Karl Rimm. The latter was a veteran of the Russian Civil War. The plan envisaged the main attack aimed at Tallinn, with subsequent coups in Tartu, Narva, Pärnu, Viljandi, Rakvere, Kunda, and Kohila. The revolt was supposed to start at 5:15 a.m. The 279 communists, mostly infiltrated from the Soviet Union, were armed with 5 Thompson light machine guns, 55 rifles, 65 hand grenades, 8 explosive devices and 150 pistols. It was mistakenly expected that the workers and soldiers would join the insurgency and would seize power in the capital together. The plan called for the establishment of an Estonian Soviet Socialist Republic and of a \"working people's government\". Most of the schemes were spoiled by the Trial of the 149 in November 1924, which eliminated many potential communist organisers. The gunmen's first priority was to take over the Estonian National Defence College based in the Tondi suburb south of the city centre, the main narrow gauge railway station in Tallinn-Väike, and a battalion of engineering troops in Nõmme."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which did the communists have more of, rifles or pistols?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "pistols"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "60 Razvedupr officers were dispatched to Tallinn in the spring of 1924 to organise an uprising. The plan for was hatched by Jaan Anvelt and Karl Rimm. The latter was a veteran of the Russian Civil War. The plan envisaged the main attack aimed at Tallinn, with subsequent coups in Tartu, Narva, Pärnu, Viljandi, Rakvere, Kunda, and Kohila. The revolt was supposed to start at 5:15 a.m. The 279 communists, mostly infiltrated from the Soviet Union, were armed with 5 Thompson light machine guns, 55 rifles, 65 hand grenades, 8 explosive devices and 150 pistols. It was mistakenly expected that the workers and soldiers would join the insurgency and would seize power in the capital together. The plan called for the establishment of an Estonian Soviet Socialist Republic and of a \"working people's government\". Most of the schemes were spoiled by the Trial of the 149 in November 1924, which eliminated many potential communist organisers. The gunmen's first priority was to take over the Estonian National Defence College based in the Tondi suburb south of the city centre, the main narrow gauge railway station in Tallinn-Väike, and a battalion of engineering troops in Nõmme."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many more pistols than rifles did the communists have?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "95"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "60 Razvedupr officers were dispatched to Tallinn in the spring of 1924 to organise an uprising. The plan for was hatched by Jaan Anvelt and Karl Rimm. The latter was a veteran of the Russian Civil War. The plan envisaged the main attack aimed at Tallinn, with subsequent coups in Tartu, Narva, Pärnu, Viljandi, Rakvere, Kunda, and Kohila. The revolt was supposed to start at 5:15 a.m. The 279 communists, mostly infiltrated from the Soviet Union, were armed with 5 Thompson light machine guns, 55 rifles, 65 hand grenades, 8 explosive devices and 150 pistols. It was mistakenly expected that the workers and soldiers would join the insurgency and would seize power in the capital together. The plan called for the establishment of an Estonian Soviet Socialist Republic and of a \"working people's government\". Most of the schemes were spoiled by the Trial of the 149 in November 1924, which eliminated many potential communist organisers. The gunmen's first priority was to take over the Estonian National Defence College based in the Tondi suburb south of the city centre, the main narrow gauge railway station in Tallinn-Väike, and a battalion of engineering troops in Nõmme."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Were there more communists or Razvedupr officers?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Razvedupr officers"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "60 Razvedupr officers were dispatched to Tallinn in the spring of 1924 to organise an uprising. The plan for was hatched by Jaan Anvelt and Karl Rimm. The latter was a veteran of the Russian Civil War. The plan envisaged the main attack aimed at Tallinn, with subsequent coups in Tartu, Narva, Pärnu, Viljandi, Rakvere, Kunda, and Kohila. The revolt was supposed to start at 5:15 a.m. The 279 communists, mostly infiltrated from the Soviet Union, were armed with 5 Thompson light machine guns, 55 rifles, 65 hand grenades, 8 explosive devices and 150 pistols. It was mistakenly expected that the workers and soldiers would join the insurgency and would seize power in the capital together. The plan called for the establishment of an Estonian Soviet Socialist Republic and of a \"working people's government\". Most of the schemes were spoiled by the Trial of the 149 in November 1924, which eliminated many potential communist organisers. The gunmen's first priority was to take over the Estonian National Defence College based in the Tondi suburb south of the city centre, the main narrow gauge railway station in Tallinn-Väike, and a battalion of engineering troops in Nõmme."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many less Thompson light machine guns did the communists have than explosice devices?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "3"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "60 Razvedupr officers were dispatched to Tallinn in the spring of 1924 to organise an uprising. The plan for was hatched by Jaan Anvelt and Karl Rimm. The latter was a veteran of the Russian Civil War. The plan envisaged the main attack aimed at Tallinn, with subsequent coups in Tartu, Narva, Pärnu, Viljandi, Rakvere, Kunda, and Kohila. The revolt was supposed to start at 5:15 a.m. The 279 communists, mostly infiltrated from the Soviet Union, were armed with 5 Thompson light machine guns, 55 rifles, 65 hand grenades, 8 explosive devices and 150 pistols. It was mistakenly expected that the workers and soldiers would join the insurgency and would seize power in the capital together. The plan called for the establishment of an Estonian Soviet Socialist Republic and of a \"working people's government\". Most of the schemes were spoiled by the Trial of the 149 in November 1924, which eliminated many potential communist organisers. The gunmen's first priority was to take over the Estonian National Defence College based in the Tondi suburb south of the city centre, the main narrow gauge railway station in Tallinn-Väike, and a battalion of engineering troops in Nõmme."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many more pistols were the communists armed with than hand grenades and rifles combined?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "30"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "60 Razvedupr officers were dispatched to Tallinn in the spring of 1924 to organise an uprising. The plan for was hatched by Jaan Anvelt and Karl Rimm. The latter was a veteran of the Russian Civil War. The plan envisaged the main attack aimed at Tallinn, with subsequent coups in Tartu, Narva, Pärnu, Viljandi, Rakvere, Kunda, and Kohila. The revolt was supposed to start at 5:15 a.m. The 279 communists, mostly infiltrated from the Soviet Union, were armed with 5 Thompson light machine guns, 55 rifles, 65 hand grenades, 8 explosive devices and 150 pistols. It was mistakenly expected that the workers and soldiers would join the insurgency and would seize power in the capital together. The plan called for the establishment of an Estonian Soviet Socialist Republic and of a \"working people's government\". Most of the schemes were spoiled by the Trial of the 149 in November 1924, which eliminated many potential communist organisers. The gunmen's first priority was to take over the Estonian National Defence College based in the Tondi suburb south of the city centre, the main narrow gauge railway station in Tallinn-Väike, and a battalion of engineering troops in Nõmme."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Which was not a veteran of the Russian Civil War, Jaan Anvelt or Karl Rimm?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Jaan Anvelt"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Mohács is seen by many Hungarians as the decisive downward turning point in the country's history, a national trauma that persists in the nation's folk memory. For moments of bad luck, Hungarians still say: \"more was lost at Mohács\" . Hungarians view Mohács as marking the end of an independent and powerful European nation. Whilst Mohács was a decisive loss, it was the aftermath that truly put an end to independent Hungary. The ensuing two hundred years of near constant warfare between the two empires, Habsburg and Ottoman, turned Hungary into a perpetual battlefield. The countryside was regularly ravaged by armies moving back and forth, in turn devastating the population. Only in the 19th century would Hungary regain some degree of autonomy, with full independence coming only after the First World War; however, the Treaty of Trianon awarded much of its former land to other states , and Hungary has never regained its former political power. In the 464 years from 1525 to 1989, Hungary spent the vast majority of the time under the direct or indirect domination of a foreign power. These foreign powers were, successively, the Ottoman Empire , the Holy Roman Empire , the Austrian Empire , and the Soviet Union ; furthermore, between 1867 and 1918 Hungary was widely considered the \"junior\" partner in the Austro-Hungarian Empire: autonomy was granted, but stopped well short of independence. The battlefield, beside the village of Sátorhely, became an official national historical memorial site in 1976 on the 450th anniversary of the battle. The memorial was designed by architect György Vadász. A new reception hall and exhibition building, also designed by Vadász and partially funded by the European Union, was completed in 2011."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "What was the former year of Hungary being considered the junior partner?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "1867"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Mohács is seen by many Hungarians as the decisive downward turning point in the country's history, a national trauma that persists in the nation's folk memory. For moments of bad luck, Hungarians still say: \"more was lost at Mohács\" . Hungarians view Mohács as marking the end of an independent and powerful European nation. Whilst Mohács was a decisive loss, it was the aftermath that truly put an end to independent Hungary. The ensuing two hundred years of near constant warfare between the two empires, Habsburg and Ottoman, turned Hungary into a perpetual battlefield. The countryside was regularly ravaged by armies moving back and forth, in turn devastating the population. Only in the 19th century would Hungary regain some degree of autonomy, with full independence coming only after the First World War; however, the Treaty of Trianon awarded much of its former land to other states , and Hungary has never regained its former political power. In the 464 years from 1525 to 1989, Hungary spent the vast majority of the time under the direct or indirect domination of a foreign power. These foreign powers were, successively, the Ottoman Empire , the Holy Roman Empire , the Austrian Empire , and the Soviet Union ; furthermore, between 1867 and 1918 Hungary was widely considered the \"junior\" partner in the Austro-Hungarian Empire: autonomy was granted, but stopped well short of independence. The battlefield, beside the village of Sátorhely, became an official national historical memorial site in 1976 on the 450th anniversary of the battle. The memorial was designed by architect György Vadász. A new reception hall and exhibition building, also designed by Vadász and partially funded by the European Union, was completed in 2011."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "What was the latter year of Hungary being considered the junior partner?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "1918"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Mohács is seen by many Hungarians as the decisive downward turning point in the country's history, a national trauma that persists in the nation's folk memory. For moments of bad luck, Hungarians still say: \"more was lost at Mohács\" . Hungarians view Mohács as marking the end of an independent and powerful European nation. Whilst Mohács was a decisive loss, it was the aftermath that truly put an end to independent Hungary. The ensuing two hundred years of near constant warfare between the two empires, Habsburg and Ottoman, turned Hungary into a perpetual battlefield. The countryside was regularly ravaged by armies moving back and forth, in turn devastating the population. Only in the 19th century would Hungary regain some degree of autonomy, with full independence coming only after the First World War; however, the Treaty of Trianon awarded much of its former land to other states , and Hungary has never regained its former political power. In the 464 years from 1525 to 1989, Hungary spent the vast majority of the time under the direct or indirect domination of a foreign power. These foreign powers were, successively, the Ottoman Empire , the Holy Roman Empire , the Austrian Empire , and the Soviet Union ; furthermore, between 1867 and 1918 Hungary was widely considered the \"junior\" partner in the Austro-Hungarian Empire: autonomy was granted, but stopped well short of independence. The battlefield, beside the village of Sátorhely, became an official national historical memorial site in 1976 on the 450th anniversary of the battle. The memorial was designed by architect György Vadász. A new reception hall and exhibition building, also designed by Vadász and partially funded by the European Union, was completed in 2011."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "What anniversary was the battle in just a number?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "450"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Mohács is seen by many Hungarians as the decisive downward turning point in the country's history, a national trauma that persists in the nation's folk memory. For moments of bad luck, Hungarians still say: \"more was lost at Mohács\" . Hungarians view Mohács as marking the end of an independent and powerful European nation. Whilst Mohács was a decisive loss, it was the aftermath that truly put an end to independent Hungary. The ensuing two hundred years of near constant warfare between the two empires, Habsburg and Ottoman, turned Hungary into a perpetual battlefield. The countryside was regularly ravaged by armies moving back and forth, in turn devastating the population. Only in the 19th century would Hungary regain some degree of autonomy, with full independence coming only after the First World War; however, the Treaty of Trianon awarded much of its former land to other states , and Hungary has never regained its former political power. In the 464 years from 1525 to 1989, Hungary spent the vast majority of the time under the direct or indirect domination of a foreign power. These foreign powers were, successively, the Ottoman Empire , the Holy Roman Empire , the Austrian Empire , and the Soviet Union ; furthermore, between 1867 and 1918 Hungary was widely considered the \"junior\" partner in the Austro-Hungarian Empire: autonomy was granted, but stopped well short of independence. The battlefield, beside the village of Sátorhely, became an official national historical memorial site in 1976 on the 450th anniversary of the battle. The memorial was designed by architect György Vadász. A new reception hall and exhibition building, also designed by Vadász and partially funded by the European Union, was completed in 2011."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many different foreign powers had some form of control over Hungary from 1525 to 1989?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "4"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Mohács is seen by many Hungarians as the decisive downward turning point in the country's history, a national trauma that persists in the nation's folk memory. For moments of bad luck, Hungarians still say: \"more was lost at Mohács\" . Hungarians view Mohács as marking the end of an independent and powerful European nation. Whilst Mohács was a decisive loss, it was the aftermath that truly put an end to independent Hungary. The ensuing two hundred years of near constant warfare between the two empires, Habsburg and Ottoman, turned Hungary into a perpetual battlefield. The countryside was regularly ravaged by armies moving back and forth, in turn devastating the population. Only in the 19th century would Hungary regain some degree of autonomy, with full independence coming only after the First World War; however, the Treaty of Trianon awarded much of its former land to other states , and Hungary has never regained its former political power. In the 464 years from 1525 to 1989, Hungary spent the vast majority of the time under the direct or indirect domination of a foreign power. These foreign powers were, successively, the Ottoman Empire , the Holy Roman Empire , the Austrian Empire , and the Soviet Union ; furthermore, between 1867 and 1918 Hungary was widely considered the \"junior\" partner in the Austro-Hungarian Empire: autonomy was granted, but stopped well short of independence. The battlefield, beside the village of Sátorhely, became an official national historical memorial site in 1976 on the 450th anniversary of the battle. The memorial was designed by architect György Vadász. A new reception hall and exhibition building, also designed by Vadász and partially funded by the European Union, was completed in 2011."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Who was involved in the two hundred years of constant warfare in Hungary?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Habsburg and Ottoman"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Mohács is seen by many Hungarians as the decisive downward turning point in the country's history, a national trauma that persists in the nation's folk memory. For moments of bad luck, Hungarians still say: \"more was lost at Mohács\" . Hungarians view Mohács as marking the end of an independent and powerful European nation. Whilst Mohács was a decisive loss, it was the aftermath that truly put an end to independent Hungary. The ensuing two hundred years of near constant warfare between the two empires, Habsburg and Ottoman, turned Hungary into a perpetual battlefield. The countryside was regularly ravaged by armies moving back and forth, in turn devastating the population. Only in the 19th century would Hungary regain some degree of autonomy, with full independence coming only after the First World War; however, the Treaty of Trianon awarded much of its former land to other states , and Hungary has never regained its former political power. In the 464 years from 1525 to 1989, Hungary spent the vast majority of the time under the direct or indirect domination of a foreign power. These foreign powers were, successively, the Ottoman Empire , the Holy Roman Empire , the Austrian Empire , and the Soviet Union ; furthermore, between 1867 and 1918 Hungary was widely considered the \"junior\" partner in the Austro-Hungarian Empire: autonomy was granted, but stopped well short of independence. The battlefield, beside the village of Sátorhely, became an official national historical memorial site in 1976 on the 450th anniversary of the battle. The memorial was designed by architect György Vadász. A new reception hall and exhibition building, also designed by Vadász and partially funded by the European Union, was completed in 2011."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "What was a national trauma?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Mohács"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Mohács is seen by many Hungarians as the decisive downward turning point in the country's history, a national trauma that persists in the nation's folk memory. For moments of bad luck, Hungarians still say: \"more was lost at Mohács\" . Hungarians view Mohács as marking the end of an independent and powerful European nation. Whilst Mohács was a decisive loss, it was the aftermath that truly put an end to independent Hungary. The ensuing two hundred years of near constant warfare between the two empires, Habsburg and Ottoman, turned Hungary into a perpetual battlefield. The countryside was regularly ravaged by armies moving back and forth, in turn devastating the population. Only in the 19th century would Hungary regain some degree of autonomy, with full independence coming only after the First World War; however, the Treaty of Trianon awarded much of its former land to other states , and Hungary has never regained its former political power. In the 464 years from 1525 to 1989, Hungary spent the vast majority of the time under the direct or indirect domination of a foreign power. These foreign powers were, successively, the Ottoman Empire , the Holy Roman Empire , the Austrian Empire , and the Soviet Union ; furthermore, between 1867 and 1918 Hungary was widely considered the \"junior\" partner in the Austro-Hungarian Empire: autonomy was granted, but stopped well short of independence. The battlefield, beside the village of Sátorhely, became an official national historical memorial site in 1976 on the 450th anniversary of the battle. The memorial was designed by architect György Vadász. A new reception hall and exhibition building, also designed by Vadász and partially funded by the European Union, was completed in 2011."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "who lost their independent in Mohacs?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Hungarians"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Mohács is seen by many Hungarians as the decisive downward turning point in the country's history, a national trauma that persists in the nation's folk memory. For moments of bad luck, Hungarians still say: \"more was lost at Mohács\" . Hungarians view Mohács as marking the end of an independent and powerful European nation. Whilst Mohács was a decisive loss, it was the aftermath that truly put an end to independent Hungary. The ensuing two hundred years of near constant warfare between the two empires, Habsburg and Ottoman, turned Hungary into a perpetual battlefield. The countryside was regularly ravaged by armies moving back and forth, in turn devastating the population. Only in the 19th century would Hungary regain some degree of autonomy, with full independence coming only after the First World War; however, the Treaty of Trianon awarded much of its former land to other states , and Hungary has never regained its former political power. In the 464 years from 1525 to 1989, Hungary spent the vast majority of the time under the direct or indirect domination of a foreign power. These foreign powers were, successively, the Ottoman Empire , the Holy Roman Empire , the Austrian Empire , and the Soviet Union ; furthermore, between 1867 and 1918 Hungary was widely considered the \"junior\" partner in the Austro-Hungarian Empire: autonomy was granted, but stopped well short of independence. The battlefield, beside the village of Sátorhely, became an official national historical memorial site in 1976 on the 450th anniversary of the battle. The memorial was designed by architect György Vadász. A new reception hall and exhibition building, also designed by Vadász and partially funded by the European Union, was completed in 2011."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many years span these events?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "486"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Mohács is seen by many Hungarians as the decisive downward turning point in the country's history, a national trauma that persists in the nation's folk memory. For moments of bad luck, Hungarians still say: \"more was lost at Mohács\" . Hungarians view Mohács as marking the end of an independent and powerful European nation. Whilst Mohács was a decisive loss, it was the aftermath that truly put an end to independent Hungary. The ensuing two hundred years of near constant warfare between the two empires, Habsburg and Ottoman, turned Hungary into a perpetual battlefield. The countryside was regularly ravaged by armies moving back and forth, in turn devastating the population. Only in the 19th century would Hungary regain some degree of autonomy, with full independence coming only after the First World War; however, the Treaty of Trianon awarded much of its former land to other states , and Hungary has never regained its former political power. In the 464 years from 1525 to 1989, Hungary spent the vast majority of the time under the direct or indirect domination of a foreign power. These foreign powers were, successively, the Ottoman Empire , the Holy Roman Empire , the Austrian Empire , and the Soviet Union ; furthermore, between 1867 and 1918 Hungary was widely considered the \"junior\" partner in the Austro-Hungarian Empire: autonomy was granted, but stopped well short of independence. The battlefield, beside the village of Sátorhely, became an official national historical memorial site in 1976 on the 450th anniversary of the battle. The memorial was designed by architect György Vadász. A new reception hall and exhibition building, also designed by Vadász and partially funded by the European Union, was completed in 2011."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "What event happened last, Vadasz's reception hall was completed, or battlefield became the national historical site?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Vadasz's reception hall was completed"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Mohács is seen by many Hungarians as the decisive downward turning point in the country's history, a national trauma that persists in the nation's folk memory. For moments of bad luck, Hungarians still say: \"more was lost at Mohács\" . Hungarians view Mohács as marking the end of an independent and powerful European nation. Whilst Mohács was a decisive loss, it was the aftermath that truly put an end to independent Hungary. The ensuing two hundred years of near constant warfare between the two empires, Habsburg and Ottoman, turned Hungary into a perpetual battlefield. The countryside was regularly ravaged by armies moving back and forth, in turn devastating the population. Only in the 19th century would Hungary regain some degree of autonomy, with full independence coming only after the First World War; however, the Treaty of Trianon awarded much of its former land to other states , and Hungary has never regained its former political power. In the 464 years from 1525 to 1989, Hungary spent the vast majority of the time under the direct or indirect domination of a foreign power. These foreign powers were, successively, the Ottoman Empire , the Holy Roman Empire , the Austrian Empire , and the Soviet Union ; furthermore, between 1867 and 1918 Hungary was widely considered the \"junior\" partner in the Austro-Hungarian Empire: autonomy was granted, but stopped well short of independence. The battlefield, beside the village of Sátorhely, became an official national historical memorial site in 1976 on the 450th anniversary of the battle. The memorial was designed by architect György Vadász. A new reception hall and exhibition building, also designed by Vadász and partially funded by the European Union, was completed in 2011."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many years was Hungary considered the \"junior\" partner in the Austro-Hungarian Empire?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "51"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Mohács is seen by many Hungarians as the decisive downward turning point in the country's history, a national trauma that persists in the nation's folk memory. For moments of bad luck, Hungarians still say: \"more was lost at Mohács\" . Hungarians view Mohács as marking the end of an independent and powerful European nation. Whilst Mohács was a decisive loss, it was the aftermath that truly put an end to independent Hungary. The ensuing two hundred years of near constant warfare between the two empires, Habsburg and Ottoman, turned Hungary into a perpetual battlefield. The countryside was regularly ravaged by armies moving back and forth, in turn devastating the population. Only in the 19th century would Hungary regain some degree of autonomy, with full independence coming only after the First World War; however, the Treaty of Trianon awarded much of its former land to other states , and Hungary has never regained its former political power. In the 464 years from 1525 to 1989, Hungary spent the vast majority of the time under the direct or indirect domination of a foreign power. These foreign powers were, successively, the Ottoman Empire , the Holy Roman Empire , the Austrian Empire , and the Soviet Union ; furthermore, between 1867 and 1918 Hungary was widely considered the \"junior\" partner in the Austro-Hungarian Empire: autonomy was granted, but stopped well short of independence. The battlefield, beside the village of Sátorhely, became an official national historical memorial site in 1976 on the 450th anniversary of the battle. The memorial was designed by architect György Vadász. A new reception hall and exhibition building, also designed by Vadász and partially funded by the European Union, was completed in 2011."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "What battle did the memorial designed by György Vadász commemorate?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Mohács"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Mohács is seen by many Hungarians as the decisive downward turning point in the country's history, a national trauma that persists in the nation's folk memory. For moments of bad luck, Hungarians still say: \"more was lost at Mohács\" . Hungarians view Mohács as marking the end of an independent and powerful European nation. Whilst Mohács was a decisive loss, it was the aftermath that truly put an end to independent Hungary. The ensuing two hundred years of near constant warfare between the two empires, Habsburg and Ottoman, turned Hungary into a perpetual battlefield. The countryside was regularly ravaged by armies moving back and forth, in turn devastating the population. Only in the 19th century would Hungary regain some degree of autonomy, with full independence coming only after the First World War; however, the Treaty of Trianon awarded much of its former land to other states , and Hungary has never regained its former political power. In the 464 years from 1525 to 1989, Hungary spent the vast majority of the time under the direct or indirect domination of a foreign power. These foreign powers were, successively, the Ottoman Empire , the Holy Roman Empire , the Austrian Empire , and the Soviet Union ; furthermore, between 1867 and 1918 Hungary was widely considered the \"junior\" partner in the Austro-Hungarian Empire: autonomy was granted, but stopped well short of independence. The battlefield, beside the village of Sátorhely, became an official national historical memorial site in 1976 on the 450th anniversary of the battle. The memorial was designed by architect György Vadász. A new reception hall and exhibition building, also designed by Vadász and partially funded by the European Union, was completed in 2011."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Where did the Mohács battle take place?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Sátorhely"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Mohács is seen by many Hungarians as the decisive downward turning point in the country's history, a national trauma that persists in the nation's folk memory. For moments of bad luck, Hungarians still say: \"more was lost at Mohács\" . Hungarians view Mohács as marking the end of an independent and powerful European nation. Whilst Mohács was a decisive loss, it was the aftermath that truly put an end to independent Hungary. The ensuing two hundred years of near constant warfare between the two empires, Habsburg and Ottoman, turned Hungary into a perpetual battlefield. The countryside was regularly ravaged by armies moving back and forth, in turn devastating the population. Only in the 19th century would Hungary regain some degree of autonomy, with full independence coming only after the First World War; however, the Treaty of Trianon awarded much of its former land to other states , and Hungary has never regained its former political power. In the 464 years from 1525 to 1989, Hungary spent the vast majority of the time under the direct or indirect domination of a foreign power. These foreign powers were, successively, the Ottoman Empire , the Holy Roman Empire , the Austrian Empire , and the Soviet Union ; furthermore, between 1867 and 1918 Hungary was widely considered the \"junior\" partner in the Austro-Hungarian Empire: autonomy was granted, but stopped well short of independence. The battlefield, beside the village of Sátorhely, became an official national historical memorial site in 1976 on the 450th anniversary of the battle. The memorial was designed by architect György Vadász. A new reception hall and exhibition building, also designed by Vadász and partially funded by the European Union, was completed in 2011."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "What put an end to Hungary's independence?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "constant warfare between Habsburg and Ottoman"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Mohács is seen by many Hungarians as the decisive downward turning point in the country's history, a national trauma that persists in the nation's folk memory. For moments of bad luck, Hungarians still say: \"more was lost at Mohács\" . Hungarians view Mohács as marking the end of an independent and powerful European nation. Whilst Mohács was a decisive loss, it was the aftermath that truly put an end to independent Hungary. The ensuing two hundred years of near constant warfare between the two empires, Habsburg and Ottoman, turned Hungary into a perpetual battlefield. The countryside was regularly ravaged by armies moving back and forth, in turn devastating the population. Only in the 19th century would Hungary regain some degree of autonomy, with full independence coming only after the First World War; however, the Treaty of Trianon awarded much of its former land to other states , and Hungary has never regained its former political power. In the 464 years from 1525 to 1989, Hungary spent the vast majority of the time under the direct or indirect domination of a foreign power. These foreign powers were, successively, the Ottoman Empire , the Holy Roman Empire , the Austrian Empire , and the Soviet Union ; furthermore, between 1867 and 1918 Hungary was widely considered the \"junior\" partner in the Austro-Hungarian Empire: autonomy was granted, but stopped well short of independence. The battlefield, beside the village of Sátorhely, became an official national historical memorial site in 1976 on the 450th anniversary of the battle. The memorial was designed by architect György Vadász. A new reception hall and exhibition building, also designed by Vadász and partially funded by the European Union, was completed in 2011."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Where is the memorial created by György Vadász?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "beside the village of Sátorhely"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Mohács is seen by many Hungarians as the decisive downward turning point in the country's history, a national trauma that persists in the nation's folk memory. For moments of bad luck, Hungarians still say: \"more was lost at Mohács\" . Hungarians view Mohács as marking the end of an independent and powerful European nation. Whilst Mohács was a decisive loss, it was the aftermath that truly put an end to independent Hungary. The ensuing two hundred years of near constant warfare between the two empires, Habsburg and Ottoman, turned Hungary into a perpetual battlefield. The countryside was regularly ravaged by armies moving back and forth, in turn devastating the population. Only in the 19th century would Hungary regain some degree of autonomy, with full independence coming only after the First World War; however, the Treaty of Trianon awarded much of its former land to other states , and Hungary has never regained its former political power. In the 464 years from 1525 to 1989, Hungary spent the vast majority of the time under the direct or indirect domination of a foreign power. These foreign powers were, successively, the Ottoman Empire , the Holy Roman Empire , the Austrian Empire , and the Soviet Union ; furthermore, between 1867 and 1918 Hungary was widely considered the \"junior\" partner in the Austro-Hungarian Empire: autonomy was granted, but stopped well short of independence. The battlefield, beside the village of Sátorhely, became an official national historical memorial site in 1976 on the 450th anniversary of the battle. The memorial was designed by architect György Vadász. A new reception hall and exhibition building, also designed by Vadász and partially funded by the European Union, was completed in 2011."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many foreign powers dominated Hungary rom 1525 to 1989?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "4"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Mohács is seen by many Hungarians as the decisive downward turning point in the country's history, a national trauma that persists in the nation's folk memory. For moments of bad luck, Hungarians still say: \"more was lost at Mohács\" . Hungarians view Mohács as marking the end of an independent and powerful European nation. Whilst Mohács was a decisive loss, it was the aftermath that truly put an end to independent Hungary. The ensuing two hundred years of near constant warfare between the two empires, Habsburg and Ottoman, turned Hungary into a perpetual battlefield. The countryside was regularly ravaged by armies moving back and forth, in turn devastating the population. Only in the 19th century would Hungary regain some degree of autonomy, with full independence coming only after the First World War; however, the Treaty of Trianon awarded much of its former land to other states , and Hungary has never regained its former political power. In the 464 years from 1525 to 1989, Hungary spent the vast majority of the time under the direct or indirect domination of a foreign power. These foreign powers were, successively, the Ottoman Empire , the Holy Roman Empire , the Austrian Empire , and the Soviet Union ; furthermore, between 1867 and 1918 Hungary was widely considered the \"junior\" partner in the Austro-Hungarian Empire: autonomy was granted, but stopped well short of independence. The battlefield, beside the village of Sátorhely, became an official national historical memorial site in 1976 on the 450th anniversary of the battle. The memorial was designed by architect György Vadász. A new reception hall and exhibition building, also designed by Vadász and partially funded by the European Union, was completed in 2011."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many years was Hungary dominated for?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "464 years"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Mohács is seen by many Hungarians as the decisive downward turning point in the country's history, a national trauma that persists in the nation's folk memory. For moments of bad luck, Hungarians still say: \"more was lost at Mohács\" . Hungarians view Mohács as marking the end of an independent and powerful European nation. Whilst Mohács was a decisive loss, it was the aftermath that truly put an end to independent Hungary. The ensuing two hundred years of near constant warfare between the two empires, Habsburg and Ottoman, turned Hungary into a perpetual battlefield. The countryside was regularly ravaged by armies moving back and forth, in turn devastating the population. Only in the 19th century would Hungary regain some degree of autonomy, with full independence coming only after the First World War; however, the Treaty of Trianon awarded much of its former land to other states , and Hungary has never regained its former political power. In the 464 years from 1525 to 1989, Hungary spent the vast majority of the time under the direct or indirect domination of a foreign power. These foreign powers were, successively, the Ottoman Empire , the Holy Roman Empire , the Austrian Empire , and the Soviet Union ; furthermore, between 1867 and 1918 Hungary was widely considered the \"junior\" partner in the Austro-Hungarian Empire: autonomy was granted, but stopped well short of independence. The battlefield, beside the village of Sátorhely, became an official national historical memorial site in 1976 on the 450th anniversary of the battle. The memorial was designed by architect György Vadász. A new reception hall and exhibition building, also designed by Vadász and partially funded by the European Union, was completed in 2011."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Who designed the battle memorial?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "György Vadász"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Use the following passage to answer the question that is asked afterwards. Respond with just the correct answer only. For example, if the answer is John Smith, dont say 'it was john who did it', just say 'John Smith'. If the answer is 42, respond with only digits 42 and no other characters."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Mohács is seen by many Hungarians as the decisive downward turning point in the country's history, a national trauma that persists in the nation's folk memory. For moments of bad luck, Hungarians still say: \"more was lost at Mohács\" . Hungarians view Mohács as marking the end of an independent and powerful European nation. Whilst Mohács was a decisive loss, it was the aftermath that truly put an end to independent Hungary. The ensuing two hundred years of near constant warfare between the two empires, Habsburg and Ottoman, turned Hungary into a perpetual battlefield. The countryside was regularly ravaged by armies moving back and forth, in turn devastating the population. Only in the 19th century would Hungary regain some degree of autonomy, with full independence coming only after the First World War; however, the Treaty of Trianon awarded much of its former land to other states , and Hungary has never regained its former political power. In the 464 years from 1525 to 1989, Hungary spent the vast majority of the time under the direct or indirect domination of a foreign power. These foreign powers were, successively, the Ottoman Empire , the Holy Roman Empire , the Austrian Empire , and the Soviet Union ; furthermore, between 1867 and 1918 Hungary was widely considered the \"junior\" partner in the Austro-Hungarian Empire: autonomy was granted, but stopped well short of independence. The battlefield, beside the village of Sátorhely, became an official national historical memorial site in 1976 on the 450th anniversary of the battle. The memorial was designed by architect György Vadász. A new reception hall and exhibition building, also designed by Vadász and partially funded by the European Union, was completed in 2011."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "How many years the Hungary considered the junior partner?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "51"
}
] |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.