text
stringlengths 0
820
|
---|
Designed
|
for
|
Men
|
by
|
Caroline
|
Criado
|
Perez
|
●
|
The
|
Kindness
|
of
|
the
|
Hangman
|
by
|
Henr y
|
Oster
|
●
|
So
|
Y ou
|
W ant
|
t o
|
T alk
|
About
|
Race
|
by
|
Ijeoma
|
Oluo
|
●
|
Ut opia
|
for
|
Realists
|
by
|
Rutger
|
Bregman
|
Sitemap
|
FOLLOW:
|
GITHUB
|
FEED
|
©
|
2024
|
Hannah
|
Kerner.
|
Powered
|
by
|
Jekyll
|
&
|
AcademicPages
|
,
|
a
|
fork
|
of
|
Minimal
|
Mistakes
|
.
|
Lightweight, Pre-trained Transformers for
|
Remote Sensing Timeseries
|
Gabriel Tseng1,2Ruben Cartuyvels1,3Ivan Zvonkov4Mirali Purohit5
|
David Rolnick1,2Hannah Kerner5
|
1Mila – Quebec AI Institute
|
2McGill University
|
3KU Leuven
|
4University of Maryland, College Park
|
5Arizona State University
|
Abstract
|
Machine learning methods for satellite data have a range of societally relevant
|
applications, but labels used to train models can be difficult or impossible to
|
acquire. Self-supervision is a natural solution in settings with limited labeled data,
|
but current self-supervised models for satellite data fail to take advantage of the
|
characteristics of that data, including the temporal dimension (which is critical for
|
many applications, such as monitoring crop growth) and availability of data from
|
many complementary sensors (which can significantly improve a model’s predictive
|
performance). We present Presto (the Pretrained Remote Sensing Transf ormer), a
|
model pre-trained on remote sensing pixel-timeseries data. By designing Presto
|
specifically for remote sensing data, we can create a significantly smaller but
|
performant model. Presto excels at a wide variety of globally distributed remote
|
sensing tasks and performs competitively with much larger models while requiring
|
far less compute. Presto can be used for transfer learning or as a feature extractor
|
for simple models, enabling efficient deployment at scale.
|
1 Introduction
|
Machine learning is increasingly being applied to the remote sensing domain, in particular to under-
|
stand the evolution of the Earth’s surface over time (Brown et al., 2022; V oosen, 2020; Abys et al.,
|
2024; Wang et al., 2020b). These applications can have important societally beneficial outcomes,
|
ranging from tracking progress on sustainable development goals (Ferreira et al., 2020) to improved
|
weather forecasting (English et al., 2013; V oosen, 2020) to disaster management (Kansakar and
|
Hossain, 2016). However, labeled datasets often contain labels that are few, sparse, and unreliable
|
(Bressan et al., 2022), especially for under-resourced geographies, leading to poor global gener-
|
alization (Yifang et al., 2015; Kerner et al., 2020; Nakalembe et al., 2021). This has spurred the
|
investigation of self-supervised learning algorithms for remote sensing data.
|
Current self-supervised approaches for remote sensing data have drawn from methods in computer
|
vision, yielding models that treat remote sensing data as single-timestep images (Jean et al., 2019;
|
Manas et al., 2021; Ayush et al., 2021). Such models (i) cannot benefit from patterns that emerge
|
when an area is monitored over time, which is especially important for agriculture and other seasonal
|
landcover, (ii) typically only consider a single satellite product (such as Sentinel-2 multispectral data),
|
despite there being hundreds of publicly available satellite data products (GEE), (iii) are typically
|
large and computationally expensive (Reed et al., 2022; Cong et al., 2022; Fuller et al., 2023), making
|
the deployment of these models at scale challenging, and (iv) cannot natively handle the labels for
|
Preprint.arXiv:2304.14065v4 [cs.CV] 5 Feb 2024
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.