iblai/ibl-neural-edu-tutor-7B
Text Generation
•
Updated
•
18
title
stringlengths 3
100
| video_url
stringlengths 43
43
| ext
stringclasses 1
value | url
stringlengths 322
339
| language
stringclasses 1
value | content
stringlengths 82
143k
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Common Fuel Types and Uses | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_N6BfGeC1dY | vtt | https://www.youtube.com/api/timedtext?v=_N6BfGeC1dY&ei=n1WUZdaOHay0p-oP7c64-AQ&caps=asr&opi=112496729&xoaf=5&hl=en&ip=0.0.0.0&ipbits=0&expire=1704245263&sparams=ip%2Cipbits%2Cexpire%2Cv%2Cei%2Ccaps%2Copi%2Cxoaf&signature=206E7BAFF5C0886BE2A860677722D75B6C819F99.789171543E6FAB17013C2260324C7DA40A348700&key=yt8&lang=en&name=Default&fmt=vtt | en | WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en
00:00:00.110 --> 00:00:02.680
- [Narrator] Not all
fossil fuels are the same.
00:00:02.680 --> 00:00:05.470
And this is because different
kinds of organic material
00:00:05.470 --> 00:00:07.790
were heated and compressed
in different ways
00:00:07.790 --> 00:00:10.610
creating different kinds of fossil fuels.
00:00:10.610 --> 00:00:13.620
One of these kinds of
fossil fuels is petroleum.
00:00:13.620 --> 00:00:15.010
The word petroleum comes
00:00:15.010 --> 00:00:17.430
from the Latin word for rock, petra,
00:00:17.430 --> 00:00:20.020
and the Latin word for oil, oleum.
00:00:20.020 --> 00:00:23.150
This makes sense because it's
an oily substance that's found
00:00:23.150 --> 00:00:25.230
in reservoirs trapped in rock.
00:00:25.230 --> 00:00:28.500
Humans have been using
oil for a very long time.
00:00:28.500 --> 00:00:30.570
Early civilizations found it bubbling up
00:00:30.570 --> 00:00:32.670
from the ground at natural wells.
00:00:32.670 --> 00:00:33.930
The oil they saw coming straight
00:00:33.930 --> 00:00:37.650
out of the earth is called
crude oil or crude petroleum
00:00:37.650 --> 00:00:41.070
which means that it is
unrefined and unprocessed.
00:00:41.070 --> 00:00:43.340
Crude oil was probably
one of the ingredients
00:00:43.340 --> 00:00:46.030
in Greek fire, which was
a flame throwing weapon
00:00:46.030 --> 00:00:48.410
that the Byzantines would
fling at their enemies.
00:00:48.410 --> 00:00:51.360
Today, we refine crude
oil into many products
00:00:51.360 --> 00:00:53.970
like gasoline and diesel for vehicles,
00:00:53.970 --> 00:00:57.610
kerosene for heating, and
asphalt for road construction.
00:00:57.610 --> 00:01:00.763
It's also used to make
plastics and synthetic fabrics.
00:01:01.740 --> 00:01:04.130
Another type of fossil fuel is coal
00:01:04.130 --> 00:01:06.580
which we mostly burn to make electricity,
00:01:06.580 --> 00:01:09.880
but it can also be used
for heating and cooking.
00:01:09.880 --> 00:01:12.840
It's a solid, shiny black flammable rock
00:01:12.840 --> 00:01:15.270
which is mostly formed
from the carbon remains
00:01:15.270 --> 00:01:18.070
of fossilized plants like moss.
00:01:18.070 --> 00:01:21.010
Over thousands of years,
plant material transforms
00:01:21.010 --> 00:01:24.010
into a carbon-rich compound called peat,
00:01:24.010 --> 00:01:26.820
and then with some pressure,
it becomes soft coal
00:01:26.820 --> 00:01:28.680
which is called lignite.
00:01:28.680 --> 00:01:32.580
And then with more pressure,
it becomes bituminous coal.
00:01:32.580 --> 00:01:36.500
And then finally it becomes a
hard coal called anthracite.
00:01:36.500 --> 00:01:38.800
The longer the plant remains
are put under pressure,
00:01:38.800 --> 00:01:41.210
the more energy dense it becomes.
00:01:41.210 --> 00:01:44.450
So if you burned anthracite,
you would get a lot more energy
00:01:44.450 --> 00:01:46.240
than if you burned peat.
00:01:46.240 --> 00:01:49.740
Burning coal releases carbon
dioxide, sulfur dioxide,
00:01:49.740 --> 00:01:53.270
nitrogen oxides, and
other gases into the air
00:01:53.270 --> 00:01:56.880
so coal is one of the
dirtiest fossil fuels.
00:01:56.880 --> 00:01:59.930
The cleanest burning
fossil fuel is natural gas
00:01:59.930 --> 00:02:02.760
meaning that it emits the
least amount of carbon dioxide
00:02:02.760 --> 00:02:04.540
or other air plumes.
00:02:04.540 --> 00:02:06.300
This is not the same type of gas
00:02:06.300 --> 00:02:08.070
as we put into our vehicles.
00:02:08.070 --> 00:02:09.890
That type comes from petroleum.
00:02:09.890 --> 00:02:12.090
Instead, natural gas is mostly used
00:02:12.090 --> 00:02:14.680
for generating electricity, heating homes,
00:02:14.680 --> 00:02:16.550
and cooking food.
00:02:16.550 --> 00:02:19.170
Your oven, furnace, water heater, dryer,
00:02:19.170 --> 00:02:22.090
or grill all might run on natural gas.
00:02:22.090 --> 00:02:25.570
Natural gas is a naturally
occurring mixture of gases
00:02:25.570 --> 00:02:28.520
and it's mostly made
up of methane, ethane,
00:02:28.520 --> 00:02:30.720
propane, and butane.
00:02:30.720 --> 00:02:33.470
The gas is colorless and odorless
00:02:33.470 --> 00:02:36.170
so natural gas companies
often add a rotten egg smell
00:02:36.170 --> 00:02:39.470
to the fuel to make
leaks easier to detect.
00:02:39.470 --> 00:02:42.460
But even though we can't
see or smell natural gas,
00:02:42.460 --> 00:02:46.270
humans have been detecting it
and using it for centuries.
00:02:46.270 --> 00:02:49.100
There's evidence that
more than 2,000 years ago,
00:02:49.100 --> 00:02:51.480
people in China created bamboo pipelines
00:02:51.480 --> 00:02:53.880
to transport the gas so
that they could use it
00:02:53.880 --> 00:02:57.150
to boil salt water and
separate out the salt.
00:02:57.150 --> 00:02:59.150
And today we still use pipelines
00:02:59.150 --> 00:03:00.960
to transport gas across land,
00:03:00.960 --> 00:03:03.313
although they're no
longer made out of bamboo.
00:03:04.390 --> 00:03:06.400
Another kind of non-renewable resource
00:03:06.400 --> 00:03:08.450
is nuclear fuel.
00:03:08.450 --> 00:03:11.750
Nuclear power plants
don't burn fossil fuels,
00:03:11.750 --> 00:03:14.010
instead they split uranium
00:03:14.010 --> 00:03:16.700
through something called nuclear fission.
00:03:16.700 --> 00:03:19.050
Just one kilogram of uranium
00:03:19.050 --> 00:03:23.010
can produce 24 million
kilowatt hours of energy.
00:03:23.010 --> 00:03:25.210
Compare that with one kilogram of coal
00:03:25.210 --> 00:03:28.580
which can produce eight
kilowatt hours of energy.
00:03:28.580 --> 00:03:32.640
In other words, nuclear fission
produces a lot of energy.
00:03:32.640 --> 00:03:34.770
It also produces a lot of heat
00:03:34.770 --> 00:03:36.783
which we mostly use to make electricity.
00:03:37.750 --> 00:03:41.170
Also, nuclear energy is
known as a clean energy
00:03:41.170 --> 00:03:43.300
because the only greenhouse gas emission
00:03:43.300 --> 00:03:45.680
is water vapor which tends to cycle
00:03:45.680 --> 00:03:46.900
out of the atmosphere faster
00:03:46.900 --> 00:03:49.120
than other greenhouse gases.
00:03:49.120 --> 00:03:51.280
But the downside is the spent fuel
00:03:51.280 --> 00:03:53.740
is a dangerous radioactive waste
00:03:53.740 --> 00:03:57.623
and recycling the nuclear waste
is dangerous and expensive.
00:03:59.270 --> 00:04:02.760
Petroleum, coal, natural
gas and nuclear fuel
00:04:02.760 --> 00:04:06.250
make up 85% of the world's
energy consumption.
00:04:06.250 --> 00:04:08.840
But as our populations
and our energy needs grow,
00:04:08.840 --> 00:04:10.810
it's becoming more important to integrate
00:04:10.810 --> 00:04:13.410
renewable resources, the
sources that could be restored
00:04:13.410 --> 00:04:16.450
by natural processes, into our energy mix.
00:04:16.450 --> 00:04:18.030
Here's something to think about.
00:04:18.030 --> 00:04:21.030
What's something that you do
in your day that uses energy?
00:04:21.030 --> 00:04:23.390
Does that energy come from fossil fuels?
00:04:23.390 --> 00:04:25.950
And if so, which one?
00:04:25.950 --> 00:04:27.960
Understanding how you get your energy
00:04:27.960 --> 00:04:30.920
is part of understanding
what powers your community,
00:04:30.920 --> 00:04:33.253
your country, and the world.
|
Renewable and Nonrenewable Energy Resources | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2lQFo69_hc | vtt | https://www.youtube.com/api/timedtext?v=G2lQFo69_hc&ei=n1WUZYelGobImLAPieqH2Aw&caps=asr&opi=112496729&xoaf=5&hl=en&ip=0.0.0.0&ipbits=0&expire=1704245263&sparams=ip%2Cipbits%2Cexpire%2Cv%2Cei%2Ccaps%2Copi%2Cxoaf&signature=88FF80021986F0352DB6A004118562BB0D3C3817.C679D3C2D54A64190A783B25AA9F6DA501C3219C&key=yt8&lang=en&name=Default&fmt=vtt | en | WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en
00:00:00.190 --> 00:00:03.900
- [Instructor] Today, let's
talk about energy resources.
00:00:03.900 --> 00:00:06.140
You've probably already
done something today
00:00:06.140 --> 00:00:08.160
that used energy resources,
00:00:08.160 --> 00:00:10.500
even beginning from
the moment you woke up.
00:00:10.500 --> 00:00:12.330
For me, the beginning of my day
00:00:12.330 --> 00:00:14.600
always starts with making tea.
00:00:14.600 --> 00:00:17.430
I use energy in every
step of this process.
00:00:17.430 --> 00:00:20.010
My car uses oil when I
drive to the grocery store
00:00:20.010 --> 00:00:21.150
to get the tea,
00:00:21.150 --> 00:00:24.410
my stove uses natural gas
when I boil the water,
00:00:24.410 --> 00:00:27.410
and my water heater uses
coal-sourced electricity
00:00:27.410 --> 00:00:30.020
when I wash my mug in
hot water afterwards.
00:00:30.020 --> 00:00:33.060
We use energy constantly
in our daily lives.
00:00:33.060 --> 00:00:35.120
Since the first law of thermodynamics
00:00:35.120 --> 00:00:38.570
states that energy cannot
be created nor destroyed,
00:00:38.570 --> 00:00:42.560
where does it all come from
and will we have enough?
00:00:42.560 --> 00:00:44.750
When we talk about energy resources,
00:00:44.750 --> 00:00:46.960
we could split it up into two groups:
00:00:46.960 --> 00:00:50.930
renewable energy and nonrenewable energy.
00:00:50.930 --> 00:00:53.440
I can always remember what
renewable resources are
00:00:53.440 --> 00:00:55.940
because the prefix re means again
00:00:55.940 --> 00:00:59.240
and the root new refers the
origin of the energy source,
00:00:59.240 --> 00:01:01.090
so renewable energy sources
00:01:01.090 --> 00:01:03.480
are the sources that we
can use again and again
00:01:03.480 --> 00:01:06.640
and are quickly restored
by natural processes.
00:01:06.640 --> 00:01:10.270
Renewable fuel sources
include sunlight, wind,
00:01:10.270 --> 00:01:13.150
moving water, biomass
from fast-growing plants,
00:01:13.150 --> 00:01:15.880
and geothermal heat from the earth.
00:01:15.880 --> 00:01:19.220
The lifespan of renewable
resources looks like a circle.
00:01:19.220 --> 00:01:21.460
We can use them and then
we can use them again
00:01:21.460 --> 00:01:23.320
without worrying about them running out.
00:01:23.320 --> 00:01:25.900
Nonrenewable energy
sources on the other hand,
00:01:25.900 --> 00:01:28.260
are sources that exist in a fixed amount
00:01:28.260 --> 00:01:30.120
and cannot be easily replaced.
00:01:30.120 --> 00:01:33.430
These energy sources must
be extracted from the earth,
00:01:33.430 --> 00:01:38.140
and they include things like
nuclear fuel and fossil fuels,
00:01:38.140 --> 00:01:42.240
which are things like
coal, oil, and natural gas.
00:01:42.240 --> 00:01:45.130
Fossil fuels were formed
in the geologic past
00:01:45.130 --> 00:01:47.510
from the remains of ancient organisms.
00:01:47.510 --> 00:01:50.580
Plants and animals that
died millions of years ago
00:01:50.580 --> 00:01:54.410
became buried in the soil,
partially decomposed,
00:01:54.410 --> 00:01:57.153
and were exposed to a
lot of heat and pressure.
00:01:58.380 --> 00:02:01.030
This heat and pressure
chemically rearranged
00:02:01.030 --> 00:02:03.150
the energy contained within their bodies
00:02:03.150 --> 00:02:05.670
into the fossil fuels we use today.
00:02:05.670 --> 00:02:09.620
Because they take so long to
form, we have a finite amount
00:02:09.620 --> 00:02:12.710
of nonrenewable resources
in the earth right now.
00:02:12.710 --> 00:02:16.010
The lifespan for fossil
fuels is a broken loop,
00:02:16.010 --> 00:02:17.880
a one-way ticket.
00:02:17.880 --> 00:02:20.380
First, the fossil fuel is found,
00:02:20.380 --> 00:02:22.980
then it has to be extracted.
00:02:22.980 --> 00:02:24.390
Extracting fossil fuels
00:02:24.390 --> 00:02:26.650
can involve destructive mining processes
00:02:26.650 --> 00:02:29.190
that can pollute surrounding habitats.
00:02:29.190 --> 00:02:32.760
It then has to be transported
to wherever it will be used.
00:02:32.760 --> 00:02:35.940
And using fossil fuels means burning them,
00:02:35.940 --> 00:02:37.720
which releases greenhouse gases
00:02:37.720 --> 00:02:40.270
and other pollutants into the atmosphere.
00:02:40.270 --> 00:02:41.880
Also, it can take energy
00:02:41.880 --> 00:02:44.310
to refine and process
some types of fossil fuel
00:02:44.310 --> 00:02:45.910
so that they're more helpful to us,
00:02:45.910 --> 00:02:48.410
like turning crude oil into petroleum gas,
00:02:48.410 --> 00:02:50.070
diesel, and jet fuel,
00:02:50.070 --> 00:02:53.080
and burning the fossil
fuels transforms that energy
00:02:53.080 --> 00:02:57.343
into a less organized form
of energy like heat and ash.
|
Comparing rates example | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7bBZa52h-4 | vtt | https://www.youtube.com/api/timedtext?v=C7bBZa52h-4&ei=n1WUZdPRIvu5mLAPrJybsAg&caps=asr&opi=112496729&xoaf=5&hl=en&ip=0.0.0.0&ipbits=0&expire=1704245263&sparams=ip%2Cipbits%2Cexpire%2Cv%2Cei%2Ccaps%2Copi%2Cxoaf&signature=07416888404B94578AA2E2AFCDB19A061714A65C.EF813CF6745F6113627ED577B4F77BC72B2939B9&key=yt8&lang=en&name=Default&fmt=vtt | en | WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en
00:00:00.420 --> 00:00:01.920
- [Instructor] We're told
that a conservationist
00:00:01.920 --> 00:00:04.080
has the hypothesis that when squirrels
00:00:04.080 --> 00:00:05.820
are more crowded together,
00:00:05.820 --> 00:00:08.610
they have higher rates of aggression.
00:00:08.610 --> 00:00:11.730
The table below shows
the area of three parks
00:00:11.730 --> 00:00:14.280
and the number of squirrels in each,
00:00:14.280 --> 00:00:16.290
that's given right over here.
00:00:16.290 --> 00:00:20.580
Order the parks from least
crowded to most crowded.
00:00:20.580 --> 00:00:22.170
Based on the crowdedness,
00:00:22.170 --> 00:00:24.990
in which park would the
conservationist expect to see
00:00:24.990 --> 00:00:27.540
the highest rate of aggression?
00:00:27.540 --> 00:00:30.303
So pause this video and see
if you can figure this out.
00:00:31.260 --> 00:00:34.590
All right, now let's work
through this together.
00:00:34.590 --> 00:00:37.920
So we wanna order the
parks from least crowded
00:00:37.920 --> 00:00:39.660
to most crowded.
00:00:39.660 --> 00:00:41.910
So how can we think about crowded?
00:00:41.910 --> 00:00:42.900
Well, we could think about it
00:00:42.900 --> 00:00:46.290
in terms of the number of squirrels.
00:00:46.290 --> 00:00:51.290
Squirrels per area, per hectare.
00:00:53.760 --> 00:00:56.490
And so something with a lot
of squirrels per hectare
00:00:56.490 --> 00:00:57.540
would be more crowded,
00:00:57.540 --> 00:00:59.610
and something with fewer
squirrels per hectare
00:00:59.610 --> 00:01:01.260
would be less crowded.
00:01:01.260 --> 00:01:02.820
You could also, if you wanted to,
00:01:02.820 --> 00:01:06.720
think about it in terms
of hectares per squirrel,
00:01:06.720 --> 00:01:09.330
this would also be a
legitimate way of tackling it.
00:01:09.330 --> 00:01:12.360
And of course, if you have
more hectares per squirrel,
00:01:12.360 --> 00:01:13.727
that would be less crowded.
00:01:13.727 --> 00:01:14.640
It would be the other way around.
00:01:14.640 --> 00:01:16.920
While if you had fewer
hectares per squirrel,
00:01:16.920 --> 00:01:19.050
it would be more crowded.
00:01:19.050 --> 00:01:20.460
But here, when we look at this,
00:01:20.460 --> 00:01:22.920
the numbers of squirrels
are larger than the number
00:01:22.920 --> 00:01:25.770
of hectares in every scenario.
00:01:25.770 --> 00:01:28.020
So it might be a little bit
easier to divide in this one.
00:01:28.020 --> 00:01:30.780
And this is also how my brain
tends to think about it.
00:01:30.780 --> 00:01:33.870
So let's calculate the number
of squirrels per hectare
00:01:33.870 --> 00:01:35.970
for each of these parks.
00:01:35.970 --> 00:01:39.120
So, first of all, let's
think about park A,
00:01:39.120 --> 00:01:41.460
and I will do that over here.
00:01:41.460 --> 00:01:46.050
Park A, you have 54 squirrels.
00:01:46.050 --> 00:01:51.050
I'll write squ for short,
per every eight hectares.
00:01:53.940 --> 00:01:56.100
And so this is going to be the same thing
00:01:56.100 --> 00:02:01.100
as 54 over eight squirrels per hectare.
00:02:02.610 --> 00:02:04.650
And we could try to estimate it,
00:02:04.650 --> 00:02:07.080
but it looks like they're all actually
00:02:07.080 --> 00:02:09.450
a little bit around seven
00:02:09.450 --> 00:02:10.950
if we divide the number of squirrels
00:02:10.950 --> 00:02:12.240
by the number of hectares,
00:02:12.240 --> 00:02:15.900
so we might have to get a
little bit more precise.
00:02:15.900 --> 00:02:19.590
So let's see, eight goes into
54. I will do it over here.
00:02:19.590 --> 00:02:24.590
Eight goes into 54, it goes six times,
00:02:25.650 --> 00:02:27.900
six times eight is 48.
00:02:27.900 --> 00:02:30.870
And I subtract, I get a remainder of six.
00:02:30.870 --> 00:02:33.180
And then let me put a little decimal here.
00:02:33.180 --> 00:02:35.790
And then if I bring down that zero,
00:02:35.790 --> 00:02:39.420
eight goes into 60 seven times,
00:02:39.420 --> 00:02:41.403
seven times eight is 56.
00:02:42.318 --> 00:02:43.980
And I can keep going,
00:02:43.980 --> 00:02:45.690
but let me see if this is enough precision
00:02:45.690 --> 00:02:47.220
for me to compare.
00:02:47.220 --> 00:02:49.860
So park A is approximately,
00:02:49.860 --> 00:02:52.380
I'll make this little squiggle
here for approximately,
00:02:52.380 --> 00:02:57.070
6.7 squirrels per hectare.
00:02:58.230 --> 00:03:01.110
Now let me do park B right over here.
00:03:01.110 --> 00:03:06.110
So for park B, we have 20
squirrels, squ for short,
00:03:06.330 --> 00:03:10.950
for every 2.7 hectares.
00:03:10.950 --> 00:03:12.960
Now, one thing we can
do to help simplify this
00:03:12.960 --> 00:03:14.070
so we don't have to deal with decimals
00:03:14.070 --> 00:03:16.320
is let's multiply both the numerator
00:03:16.320 --> 00:03:18.210
and the denominator by 10.
00:03:18.210 --> 00:03:21.000
Notice that's just equivalent
to multiplying by one.
00:03:21.000 --> 00:03:25.890
So this is equivalent to
saying you have 200 squirrels
00:03:25.890 --> 00:03:30.810
for every 27 hectares,
00:03:30.810 --> 00:03:34.920
or you could view it as 200
over 27 squirrels per hectare.
00:03:34.920 --> 00:03:38.107
So let's take 27 into 200,
00:03:40.170 --> 00:03:44.670
and if I were to estimate it,
let's see, 27 is close to 30.
00:03:44.670 --> 00:03:47.790
30 would go into 200 six times.
00:03:47.790 --> 00:03:48.780
Let me try that out.
00:03:48.780 --> 00:03:51.270
So it goes into 200 six times,
00:03:51.270 --> 00:03:56.070
six times seven is 42,
six times two is 12,
00:03:56.070 --> 00:03:58.770
plus four is 16.
00:03:58.770 --> 00:04:00.510
And then if I subtract,
00:04:00.510 --> 00:04:03.480
I am going to actually
get, it looks like 38.
00:04:03.480 --> 00:04:06.660
So maybe I can fit in one more 27 there.
00:04:06.660 --> 00:04:10.863
So let me do that seven.
So seven times seven is 49.
00:04:12.300 --> 00:04:17.300
49, seven times two is 14 plus four is 18.
00:04:18.390 --> 00:04:20.970
Yep, that worked out nicely.
00:04:20.970 --> 00:04:25.830
If you subtract 189 from
200, you're going to get 11.
00:04:25.830 --> 00:04:28.680
And now let me bring down a zero.
00:04:28.680 --> 00:04:33.000
So how many times does 27 go into 110?
00:04:33.000 --> 00:04:36.090
Well, it looks like it
goes three times, I think.
00:04:36.090 --> 00:04:40.260
Three times seven is 21,
three times two is six,
00:04:40.260 --> 00:04:42.720
plus two is eight.
00:04:42.720 --> 00:04:45.810
And it looks like actually
I could fit in one more.
00:04:45.810 --> 00:04:50.760
So let's see, it might
go four times. So 110.
00:04:50.760 --> 00:04:55.500
So if they go four times,
four times seven is 28,
00:04:55.500 --> 00:04:58.890
and then four times two
is eight, plus two is 10.
00:04:58.890 --> 00:05:02.490
Yeah, it went four times,
so get a remainder of two.
00:05:02.490 --> 00:05:05.760
So we could keep going, but
this is approximately 7.4.
00:05:05.760 --> 00:05:10.760
So approximately 7.4
squirrels per hectare.
00:05:11.040 --> 00:05:15.570
So we already see that park B
is more crowded than park A,
00:05:15.570 --> 00:05:18.180
but now let's check out park C.
00:05:18.180 --> 00:05:23.180
And so for park C, we have 51 squirrels
00:05:25.260 --> 00:05:30.260
for every 6.8 hectares, 6.8 hectares.
00:05:30.540 --> 00:05:32.160
So we could do the same idea.
00:05:32.160 --> 00:05:33.450
Let's multiply the numerator
00:05:33.450 --> 00:05:35.100
and the denominator by 10,
00:05:35.100 --> 00:05:38.910
which means that we have 510 squirrels
00:05:38.910 --> 00:05:43.740
for every 68 hectares.
00:05:43.740 --> 00:05:47.910
And so 68 will go into 510.
00:05:47.910 --> 00:05:50.490
I'm guessing I'm gonna have
to have some decimals here.
00:05:50.490 --> 00:05:52.140
So it's close to 70.
00:05:52.140 --> 00:05:57.140
70 would go into 510 about seven times.
00:05:57.180 --> 00:05:58.770
Let me see how that works out.
00:05:58.770 --> 00:06:03.630
Seven times eight is 56,
seven times six is 42,
00:06:03.630 --> 00:06:06.117
plus five is 47.
00:06:06.117 --> 00:06:08.460
And I think I did well there.
00:06:08.460 --> 00:06:12.150
So if I subtract here, I
could do some regrouping,
00:06:12.150 --> 00:06:13.830
or I could try to do it in my head.
00:06:13.830 --> 00:06:16.170
To go from 476 to 500,
00:06:16.170 --> 00:06:18.960
I would have to add 24 plus another 10.
00:06:18.960 --> 00:06:23.910
So I'm gonna have 34 right
over here, bring down a zero.
00:06:23.910 --> 00:06:27.547
And so if I'm thinking
roughly 70 goes into 340,
00:06:29.520 --> 00:06:31.050
let's see, will it go?
00:06:31.050 --> 00:06:32.910
It might go five times actually.
00:06:32.910 --> 00:06:33.743
Let me try that out.
00:06:33.743 --> 00:06:37.710
If I say 7.5, five times eight is 40,
00:06:37.710 --> 00:06:39.840
and then five times six is 30 plus four,
00:06:39.840 --> 00:06:42.030
it went exactly five times.
00:06:42.030 --> 00:06:47.030
So that means in park C, we're
at 7.5 squirrels per hectare.
00:06:47.880 --> 00:06:50.610
So what's the most crowded
if I wanted to order it?
00:06:50.610 --> 00:06:53.700
Well, the most crowded is park C,
00:06:53.700 --> 00:06:55.740
the second crowded is park B,
00:06:55.740 --> 00:06:57.900
and the third most crowded is park A.
00:06:57.900 --> 00:06:59.340
And so based on crowdedness,
00:06:59.340 --> 00:07:01.830
in which park would I expect
the highest rate of aggression?
00:07:01.830 --> 00:07:03.660
Well, park C, those squirrels are all,
00:07:03.660 --> 00:07:05.040
they're much closer to each other.
00:07:05.040 --> 00:07:06.780
They might be fighting
over things, who knows?
00:07:06.780 --> 00:07:08.943
But there we go. We answered the question.
|
Alienated | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y41Mj-fUN9U | vtt | https://www.youtube.com/api/timedtext?v=Y41Mj-fUN9U&ei=n1WUZYnVH5afxN8PwvykiAQ&caps=asr&opi=112496729&xoaf=5&hl=en&ip=0.0.0.0&ipbits=0&expire=1704245263&sparams=ip%2Cipbits%2Cexpire%2Cv%2Cei%2Ccaps%2Copi%2Cxoaf&signature=D51AF4936C7326EFCFD17BD03092986CE46FE961.3AC70D8061B56F5B504F426FB6F5E5C53C0125A0&key=yt8&lang=en&name=Default&fmt=vtt | en | WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en
00:00:00.120 --> 00:00:01.770
- [David] Hey Wordsmiths.
Just checking in.
00:00:01.770 --> 00:00:03.120
You doing okay?
00:00:03.120 --> 00:00:06.210
The word we're talking
about today is alienated,
00:00:06.210 --> 00:00:08.520
ay-lee-en-ay-ted.
00:00:08.520 --> 00:00:11.520
It's an adjective and it
means feeling excluded
00:00:11.520 --> 00:00:13.920
and apart from other people.
00:00:13.920 --> 00:00:15.060
Kind of a bummer word,
00:00:15.060 --> 00:00:17.370
but at the same time, a fascinating one.
00:00:17.370 --> 00:00:20.137
I can hear the question I
imagine some of you are asking,
00:00:20.137 --> 00:00:22.170
"David, does this have anything to do
00:00:22.170 --> 00:00:25.770
with aliens like from outer space?"
00:00:25.770 --> 00:00:29.520
And the answer is, well, kind
of. It's all the same word.
00:00:29.520 --> 00:00:32.550
Follow me Earthlings to
the derivation station.
00:00:32.550 --> 00:00:35.190
Let's talk about this word's origins.
00:00:35.190 --> 00:00:37.855
Did it come from outer space?
00:00:37.855 --> 00:00:42.270
(mysterious alien-like music)
00:00:42.270 --> 00:00:44.070
No, it comes from Latin.
00:00:44.070 --> 00:00:47.880
Alios or al in Latin
means different, other,
00:00:47.880 --> 00:00:50.580
or something that is alien is different,
00:00:50.580 --> 00:00:52.560
strange, new and foreign.
00:00:52.560 --> 00:00:55.500
An alien is someone from another country
00:00:55.500 --> 00:00:59.310
or in more modern language,
a being from another planet.
00:00:59.310 --> 00:01:02.850
And then ate, A-T-E is
a verb forming suffix.
00:01:02.850 --> 00:01:07.200
It turns nouns and
adjectives into action words.
00:01:07.200 --> 00:01:11.490
This robot is not active.
I will activate it.
00:01:11.490 --> 00:01:14.040
Someone needs to assign
a value to this artwork.
00:01:14.040 --> 00:01:19.040
I will evaluate it, right?
A very powerful suffix.
00:01:19.350 --> 00:01:21.870
So let's put this knowledge to work.
00:01:21.870 --> 00:01:23.640
What are some words you can think of
00:01:23.640 --> 00:01:25.500
that contain that al root?
00:01:25.500 --> 00:01:26.850
That root that means other.
00:01:26.850 --> 00:01:30.960
Or A-T-E, ate, the verb forming suffix.
00:01:30.960 --> 00:01:34.924
Okay, here we go. People of
earth. Ten second music break.
00:01:34.924 --> 00:01:38.424
(relaxing elevator music)
00:01:46.050 --> 00:01:48.510
Here are some words that I came up with.
00:01:48.510 --> 00:01:51.870
Altruism, which means
caring about other people,
00:01:51.870 --> 00:01:54.150
doing work for the sake of others.
00:01:54.150 --> 00:01:59.130
An alias, a word that means
an assumed name, another name,
00:02:00.300 --> 00:02:03.840
and captivate to capture
someone's imagination
00:02:03.840 --> 00:02:07.410
or attention, to fascinate, to charm.
00:02:07.410 --> 00:02:09.150
When you feel alienated,
00:02:09.150 --> 00:02:11.790
you feel like a stranger
in your own country.
00:02:11.790 --> 00:02:13.800
Like all the clocks are running backwards
00:02:13.800 --> 00:02:15.600
and the world is just wrong.
00:02:15.600 --> 00:02:18.420
I dunno why I'm trying to
explain this to you, wordsmiths.
00:02:18.420 --> 00:02:19.740
Nobody understands the feeling
00:02:19.740 --> 00:02:22.410
of alienation better than the young.
00:02:22.410 --> 00:02:25.950
Alone in a crowd is the vibe, basically.
00:02:25.950 --> 00:02:29.400
Let's use alienated in
some sentences, shall we?
00:02:29.400 --> 00:02:32.280
The intergalactic tourist felt alienated
00:02:32.280 --> 00:02:36.210
by the strange food stuffs
of this curious new planet.
00:02:36.210 --> 00:02:38.460
Oh no, the alien feels homesick and sad
00:02:38.460 --> 00:02:40.290
when they try to eat pizza.
00:02:40.290 --> 00:02:42.000
They don't know how to do it.
00:02:42.000 --> 00:02:44.190
Here's one that hits a
little bit closer to home.
00:02:44.190 --> 00:02:46.350
Noemi didn't get cast in the play
00:02:46.350 --> 00:02:49.920
and it left her feeling alienated
from her friends who did.
00:02:49.920 --> 00:02:51.450
There they are in the background,
00:02:51.450 --> 00:02:53.430
all crowded around the cast list.
00:02:53.430 --> 00:02:55.710
An awful feeling, all your
friends have something
00:02:55.710 --> 00:02:58.650
to do together after school
and you can't be a part of it
00:02:58.650 --> 00:03:00.390
because you're not in the play.
00:03:00.390 --> 00:03:05.040
I, I certainly don't know
what that's like, anyway.
00:03:05.040 --> 00:03:08.880
Another word for
alienation is estrangement,
00:03:08.880 --> 00:03:11.520
the feeling of being made strange,
00:03:11.520 --> 00:03:13.803
being made to feel far away.
00:03:14.850 --> 00:03:17.610
May you never feel that
feeling, wordsmiths.
00:03:17.610 --> 00:03:20.793
Or if you do, may you
never feel it for long.
00:03:21.780 --> 00:03:24.153
You can learn anything. David out.
|
Exclude | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r4YN1wiV6kM | vtt | https://www.youtube.com/api/timedtext?v=r4YN1wiV6kM&ei=n1WUZd-oGr-dxN8PhP2tsAs&caps=asr&opi=112496729&xoaf=5&hl=en&ip=0.0.0.0&ipbits=0&expire=1704245263&sparams=ip%2Cipbits%2Cexpire%2Cv%2Cei%2Ccaps%2Copi%2Cxoaf&signature=4A95F3BB33BA3D45817A25374154020A6534D8FE.A6B7BC0DD7F1A9FF60F5416B5937F3D1B2DB276A&key=yt8&lang=en&name=Default&fmt=vtt | en | WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en
00:00:00.120 --> 00:00:02.220
- [David] Hey, wordsmiths,
I would never dare
00:00:02.220 --> 00:00:03.450
leave you feeling left out,
00:00:03.450 --> 00:00:05.472
so I wanna warn you that
the word we're discussing
00:00:05.472 --> 00:00:09.873
in this video is exclude, ex-clude.
00:00:10.740 --> 00:00:13.350
It's a verb, it means to keep someone
00:00:13.350 --> 00:00:16.860
or something out, to prevent access.
00:00:16.860 --> 00:00:18.990
It can have a bad connotation
00:00:18.990 --> 00:00:21.600
or feeling like keeping
people from voting,
00:00:21.600 --> 00:00:23.670
excluding them from having a vote.
00:00:23.670 --> 00:00:25.800
And it can also have a neutral connotation
00:00:25.800 --> 00:00:27.960
or feeling, like excluding coffee
00:00:27.960 --> 00:00:29.610
from your diet or something.
00:00:29.610 --> 00:00:33.330
You'll also see it as exclusion,
which is the noun form.
00:00:33.330 --> 00:00:36.720
But for now, let's talk
about its derivation.
00:00:36.720 --> 00:00:40.320
Where does this word come
from? We got ex, we got clude.
00:00:40.320 --> 00:00:41.370
What's going on here?
00:00:42.420 --> 00:00:46.140
So we have two pieces of Latin here.
00:00:46.140 --> 00:00:49.950
Ex means out as in extend or expel.
00:00:49.950 --> 00:00:53.760
Those two words mean to
stretch out or to drive out.
00:00:53.760 --> 00:00:55.890
And then clude comes
from the Latin claudere,
00:00:55.890 --> 00:00:57.600
which means to close.
00:00:57.600 --> 00:01:01.560
You sometimes see this
root pop up as clus too.
00:01:01.560 --> 00:01:03.810
So when you are excluded from something,
00:01:03.810 --> 00:01:06.810
you've been closed out,
a door has been shut,
00:01:06.810 --> 00:01:09.150
and you're on the wrong side of it.
00:01:09.150 --> 00:01:12.840
But for now, let's open the
door to some similar words.
00:01:12.840 --> 00:01:14.460
I'll put on some music, all right?
00:01:14.460 --> 00:01:16.110
And you'll take that time to come up
00:01:16.110 --> 00:01:20.640
with a few words that also
use clude or clus or ex.
00:01:20.640 --> 00:01:22.386
Ready? Let's go.
00:01:22.386 --> 00:01:25.053
(hip hop music)
00:01:33.930 --> 00:01:35.850
Here are some I thought up.
00:01:35.850 --> 00:01:38.280
Exclusive, which means special or limited,
00:01:38.280 --> 00:01:39.810
related to exclude, right?
00:01:39.810 --> 00:01:42.930
An exclusive club is very
picky about who gets in.
00:01:42.930 --> 00:01:45.000
Some people are going to be excluded from
00:01:45.000 --> 00:01:47.100
or kept out of the club.
00:01:47.100 --> 00:01:51.060
Or an exclusive offer is
limited time only, act now.
00:01:51.060 --> 00:01:56.010
To conclude, to end something,
literally to close together,
00:01:56.010 --> 00:01:58.770
like drawing the curtains at a theater.
00:01:58.770 --> 00:02:02.640
Or secluded meaning out
of the way or private
00:02:02.640 --> 00:02:06.720
from Latin parts sed, meaning
apart and claudere, right?
00:02:06.720 --> 00:02:11.373
So literally to be closed
off, apart from everything.
00:02:12.450 --> 00:02:15.750
Let's use exclude in some sentences.
00:02:15.750 --> 00:02:18.450
Wanda didn't mean to exclude Bonnie.
00:02:18.450 --> 00:02:19.980
She really did honestly forget
00:02:19.980 --> 00:02:21.960
to invite her to the clam bake.
00:02:21.960 --> 00:02:25.290
Look at Bonnie being so
sad, dreaming of clams
00:02:25.290 --> 00:02:27.390
and potatoes and corn.
00:02:27.390 --> 00:02:29.340
Nobody's ever invited me to a clam bake,
00:02:29.340 --> 00:02:31.590
which is a New England beach party.
00:02:31.590 --> 00:02:34.290
They do what it sounds
like, they bake clams.
00:02:34.290 --> 00:02:36.510
Okay, let's try it now in the noun form
00:02:36.510 --> 00:02:39.630
and continuing the theme,
strangely enough, of corn.
00:02:39.630 --> 00:02:41.550
Nirmal loved corn on the cob
00:02:41.550 --> 00:02:44.700
to the exclusion of all other food.
00:02:44.700 --> 00:02:47.850
So that means he doesn't
eat anything but corn.
00:02:47.850 --> 00:02:51.870
He excludes other foods,
which is not great, my dudes.
00:02:51.870 --> 00:02:54.360
It's important to eat a
balanced diet, wordsmiths,
00:02:54.360 --> 00:02:56.910
a good mix of leafy greens and proteins
00:02:56.910 --> 00:03:00.750
and the USDA recommended two
to three new words a day.
00:03:00.750 --> 00:03:02.940
See, it's right here
on the MyPlate graphic.
00:03:02.940 --> 00:03:04.950
I didn't just put that there.
00:03:04.950 --> 00:03:09.180
I kid, I kid obviously,
but words are good for you.
00:03:09.180 --> 00:03:11.730
Okay, I'll see you in the next one.
00:03:11.730 --> 00:03:14.193
You can learn anything, David out.
|
Anxious | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UpCZQMts7hs | vtt | https://www.youtube.com/api/timedtext?v=UpCZQMts7hs&ei=n1WUZYWzGsG2hcIPsImloA4&caps=asr&opi=112496729&xoaf=5&hl=en&ip=0.0.0.0&ipbits=0&expire=1704245263&sparams=ip%2Cipbits%2Cexpire%2Cv%2Cei%2Ccaps%2Copi%2Cxoaf&signature=34576F1F37B506F468173314B9007A8BC3CEA6F2.417BDC6828EAD6C21773A3DF3D4525EED695882E&key=yt8&lang=en&name=Default&fmt=vtt | en | WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en
00:00:00.330 --> 00:00:02.374
- [David] Oh boy. Oh geez, wordsmiths.
00:00:02.374 --> 00:00:05.610
I'm not feeling so hot about
this word, I tell you what.
00:00:05.610 --> 00:00:10.200
The word is "anxious". Anxious.
00:00:10.200 --> 00:00:13.320
Or if you prefer anx-ious.
00:00:13.320 --> 00:00:16.560
It's an adjective that means very worried.
00:00:16.560 --> 00:00:19.803
You might see in its noun form, anxiety,
00:00:20.640 --> 00:00:24.090
which is the state of being very worried.
00:00:24.090 --> 00:00:26.490
If you trace this word
back to its origins,
00:00:26.490 --> 00:00:30.060
you get the Latin word
"anguere" which means
00:00:30.060 --> 00:00:32.310
to choke or to squeeze.
00:00:32.310 --> 00:00:35.400
When I feel anxious,
sometimes my throat gets tight
00:00:35.400 --> 00:00:38.220
and my heart hammers in my
chests and listen, wordsmith.
00:00:38.220 --> 00:00:39.180
It's a bad time.
00:00:39.180 --> 00:00:43.680
And that o-u-s part, ous, is
an adjective forming suffix.
00:00:43.680 --> 00:00:45.360
It means full of, right?
00:00:45.360 --> 00:00:47.490
So being anxious is being full
00:00:47.490 --> 00:00:50.460
of that choking, squeezed feeling.
00:00:50.460 --> 00:00:53.301
So a real fun one this time, huh?
00:00:53.301 --> 00:00:55.890
Let's all take a deep breath.
00:00:55.890 --> 00:00:58.440
Think of a calming centered place
00:00:58.440 --> 00:01:01.110
and come up with some related
words, some similar words
00:01:01.110 --> 00:01:05.880
that sound like anguere or
o-u-s, that end in o-u-s.
00:01:05.880 --> 00:01:10.880
I'll put on some calming
music. 10 seconds, here we go.
00:01:11.087 --> 00:01:13.754
(calming music)
00:01:22.800 --> 00:01:27.000
Here are three that I came
up with. We've got anguish.
00:01:27.000 --> 00:01:29.010
It shares the same root as anxious.
00:01:29.010 --> 00:01:30.090
That anguere word
00:01:30.090 --> 00:01:34.500
and it means misery, torment,
very deep unhappiness
00:01:34.500 --> 00:01:37.290
as if you were being choked or squeezed.
00:01:37.290 --> 00:01:38.790
Agony. Ugh.
00:01:38.790 --> 00:01:40.980
Okay, next word. Anger.
00:01:40.980 --> 00:01:42.150
This is an interesting one,
00:01:42.150 --> 00:01:44.250
'cause anger looks a lot like anguere,
00:01:44.250 --> 00:01:49.250
but actually traces back to old
Viking languages, not Latin.
00:01:49.290 --> 00:01:51.840
But it comes from an
even older shared root,
00:01:51.840 --> 00:01:55.380
a common ancestor of Latin
and the Viking languages.
00:01:55.380 --> 00:01:59.340
So it has the same meaning
of squeezed or painful,
00:01:59.340 --> 00:02:03.420
and from there we get anger,
hostility, feeling constricted
00:02:03.420 --> 00:02:06.720
and squeezed, and finally furious.
00:02:06.720 --> 00:02:10.920
Using that o-u-s ending,
it means full of fury,
00:02:10.920 --> 00:02:12.393
full of anger.
00:02:14.220 --> 00:02:17.100
I promise I'm having a very
normal day, wordsmiths.
00:02:17.100 --> 00:02:18.810
There's just something
about this derivation
00:02:18.810 --> 00:02:21.570
that puts me on edge.
00:02:21.570 --> 00:02:24.870
Okay, let's use anxious
in a sentence or two.
00:02:24.870 --> 00:02:26.910
At first, Bettina felt anxious
00:02:26.910 --> 00:02:28.950
about hiking Needleteeth Gorge,
00:02:28.950 --> 00:02:31.080
but felt reassured when she remembered
00:02:31.080 --> 00:02:34.375
that her Aunt Isabella was
a trained wilderness guide.
00:02:34.375 --> 00:02:36.960
Needleteeth Gorge does
not sound like a fun
00:02:36.960 --> 00:02:39.390
or safe place to go for a hike.
00:02:39.390 --> 00:02:42.240
To me, Bettina's worries
are understandable.
00:02:42.240 --> 00:02:44.850
Let's try another one using the noun form
00:02:44.850 --> 00:02:47.218
of the word anxiety.
00:02:47.218 --> 00:02:49.260
"Based on what you told me,
00:02:49.260 --> 00:02:52.620
it seems like potatoes are
the cause of your anxiety,"
00:02:52.620 --> 00:02:53.853
Dr. Gomez said.
00:02:54.780 --> 00:02:56.040
Sometimes it helps to talk
00:02:56.040 --> 00:03:00.030
to someone about your
feelings, potato related or no.
00:03:00.030 --> 00:03:01.643
Deep breaths, wordsmiths.
00:03:01.643 --> 00:03:05.250
You can do this, you
can conquer your anxiety
00:03:05.250 --> 00:03:07.383
and you can learn anything.
00:03:08.640 --> 00:03:09.473
David out.
|
Recognition | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zdkeZ_UDXY | vtt | https://www.youtube.com/api/timedtext?v=6zdkeZ_UDXY&ei=n1WUZc6VIN24p-oP7Jyr2AY&caps=asr&opi=112496729&xoaf=5&hl=en&ip=0.0.0.0&ipbits=0&expire=1704245263&sparams=ip%2Cipbits%2Cexpire%2Cv%2Cei%2Ccaps%2Copi%2Cxoaf&signature=3FC30EBBF1885668C3FEF5E552725E481E2E5307.5D93FBD33B662E15D13550C2B1648CCB8BAD13A7&key=yt8&lang=en&name=Default&fmt=vtt | en | WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en
00:00:00.270 --> 00:00:02.130
- [David] I see you wordsmiths.
00:00:02.130 --> 00:00:04.650
Which is good because the
word I'm talking about
00:00:04.650 --> 00:00:07.140
in this video is "recognition".
00:00:07.140 --> 00:00:11.370
Re-cog-ni-tion. It's a noun.
00:00:11.370 --> 00:00:14.580
It means the act of
acknowledging, being aware
00:00:14.580 --> 00:00:16.350
of or noticing something.
00:00:16.350 --> 00:00:18.540
Follow me over to The
Etymology Zone, trademark,
00:00:18.540 --> 00:00:21.240
where I am going to break this word down.
00:00:21.240 --> 00:00:24.660
This word comes from Latin,
"re" means back, again,
00:00:24.660 --> 00:00:26.677
or against, as in review.
00:00:26.677 --> 00:00:30.150
"Cognoscere" means to
know, to be familiar with,
00:00:30.150 --> 00:00:33.570
and i-o-n is a noun forming suffix.
00:00:33.570 --> 00:00:35.470
It's what makes this word into a noun.
00:00:36.570 --> 00:00:40.290
So what we're looking at here
is a word that means the act
00:00:40.290 --> 00:00:43.293
of knowing something again, right?
00:00:43.293 --> 00:00:48.293
So this is the noun form
of knowing something again.
00:00:48.450 --> 00:00:51.300
You recognize a person when
you've met them before,
00:00:51.300 --> 00:00:54.360
you recognize a song because
you've already heard it.
00:00:54.360 --> 00:00:59.010
So let's come up with some
words that use these word parts.
00:00:59.010 --> 00:01:03.480
Re-cogno, that i-o-n ending, if you want.
00:01:03.480 --> 00:01:05.190
I'll give you 10 seconds to come up
00:01:05.190 --> 00:01:07.440
with some words to knock some together.
00:01:07.440 --> 00:01:09.183
Okay, here we go.
00:01:09.183 --> 00:01:11.766
(upbeat music)
00:01:20.532 --> 00:01:22.200
Here are some that I came up with.
00:01:22.200 --> 00:01:25.018
Incognito, which means disguised, right?
00:01:25.018 --> 00:01:29.160
Incognito means literally not knowable.
00:01:29.160 --> 00:01:31.650
If I'm going incognito, maybe
I'm wearing a fake nose.
00:01:31.650 --> 00:01:34.110
A fake mustache, right?
00:01:34.110 --> 00:01:36.810
Reconnaissance. This
word comes from French.
00:01:36.810 --> 00:01:39.870
It basically means spying.
It's a military term.
00:01:39.870 --> 00:01:42.660
You're surveying, you're
getting to know a territory
00:01:42.660 --> 00:01:46.740
before you decide how or
whether to commit troops there.
00:01:46.740 --> 00:01:48.510
Same etymology as recognized,
00:01:48.510 --> 00:01:51.960
but it took a different
language path to get to English.
00:01:51.960 --> 00:01:54.810
And the verb to ignore, to choose
00:01:54.810 --> 00:01:57.420
to not know about something,
to not pay attention to it.
00:01:57.420 --> 00:02:01.440
Same negating prefix as incognito, right?
00:02:01.440 --> 00:02:03.720
The in or the ih part here means not
00:02:03.720 --> 00:02:07.560
and the gnore, the g-n-o-r-e
part means knowing.
00:02:07.560 --> 00:02:10.080
So not knowing, ignore.
00:02:10.080 --> 00:02:12.450
So you might ignore the spy
00:02:12.450 --> 00:02:15.930
who is incognito
performing reconnaissance.
00:02:15.930 --> 00:02:19.590
All right, let's use
recognition in some sentences.
00:02:19.590 --> 00:02:21.270
Even at a distance, Sherman
00:02:21.270 --> 00:02:23.820
recognized the familiar three-step gait
00:02:23.820 --> 00:02:25.890
of his old friend Pizzabot.
00:02:25.890 --> 00:02:30.150
Right, he could tell, he could
identify it from a distance.
00:02:30.150 --> 00:02:32.130
You can also use recognition to mean
00:02:32.130 --> 00:02:34.380
that someone is being
appreciated for something
00:02:34.380 --> 00:02:35.730
that they've done.
00:02:35.730 --> 00:02:39.000
In recognition of her service
to the city's garden club,
00:02:39.000 --> 00:02:42.160
Christina got a ceremonial
key to the city.
00:02:42.160 --> 00:02:44.647
So here it is not that
someone is literally saying,
00:02:44.647 --> 00:02:46.620
"Hey, is that Christina? I know her."
00:02:46.620 --> 00:02:50.010
It's more like the city is acknowledging
00:02:50.010 --> 00:02:52.170
and appreciating her work.
00:02:52.170 --> 00:02:54.840
It's the effort that she's
put in that they're officially
00:02:54.840 --> 00:02:59.370
noticing by giving her a
giant unwieldy novelty key.
00:02:59.370 --> 00:03:01.890
You too can hold the giant novelty key
00:03:01.890 --> 00:03:03.210
to knowledge, wordsmiths,
00:03:03.210 --> 00:03:05.493
if you hold fast to this truth.
00:03:06.510 --> 00:03:09.363
You can learn anything. David, out.
|
Advantage | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TdD_tNeTEZ0 | vtt | https://www.youtube.com/api/timedtext?v=TdD_tNeTEZ0&ei=n1WUZd-jIJ6ip-oPiIu62A0&caps=asr&opi=112496729&xoaf=5&hl=en&ip=0.0.0.0&ipbits=0&expire=1704245263&sparams=ip%2Cipbits%2Cexpire%2Cv%2Cei%2Ccaps%2Copi%2Cxoaf&signature=0767E4E56D93EE5CAFB7BDF5A3AB17F868174C3E.7F7281E8AEB8BAE929C7F551A5081C5FF25E14FD&key=yt8&lang=en&name=Default&fmt=vtt | en | WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en
00:00:00.150 --> 00:00:01.890
- [David] I have the
high ground, wordsmiths
00:00:01.890 --> 00:00:04.410
because we're talking
about the word "advantage"
00:00:04.410 --> 00:00:07.530
in this video, ad-van-tage.
00:00:07.530 --> 00:00:08.820
A noun.
00:00:08.820 --> 00:00:12.450
It means a better position,
something that helps.
00:00:12.450 --> 00:00:13.830
If we're running a foot race
00:00:13.830 --> 00:00:16.050
and I get a three minute
headstart over you,
00:00:16.050 --> 00:00:17.730
that's a definite advantage.
00:00:17.730 --> 00:00:19.950
I got to start before you did.
00:00:19.950 --> 00:00:21.750
And indeed, that's what the derivation
00:00:21.750 --> 00:00:23.887
of this word gives us.
00:00:23.887 --> 00:00:26.400
"Avantage" can literally be translated
00:00:26.400 --> 00:00:29.220
from French as beforeness.
00:00:29.220 --> 00:00:32.220
So "Avant" means before in French,
00:00:32.220 --> 00:00:34.260
both before in time
and in before in space.
00:00:34.260 --> 00:00:37.350
So it can mean both earlier and front of.
00:00:37.350 --> 00:00:41.220
Ag, in English pronounced
ig, right, this a-g-e
00:00:41.220 --> 00:00:45.402
is a noun forming suffix
that also comes from French.
00:00:45.402 --> 00:00:46.410
It works like this.
00:00:46.410 --> 00:00:48.390
You pack stuff into a package,
00:00:48.390 --> 00:00:50.640
you store things in storage.
00:00:50.640 --> 00:00:54.141
Leaky things are prone to
leakage. You get the picture.
00:00:54.141 --> 00:00:57.960
So thinking about avant or advant,
00:00:57.960 --> 00:00:59.310
right, with the "d" in there,
00:00:59.310 --> 00:01:02.610
and a-g-e as a noun forming suffix,
00:01:02.610 --> 00:01:05.013
what similar words can you think of?
00:01:05.940 --> 00:01:09.321
I'll give you 10 seconds.
Here we go, music break.
00:01:09.321 --> 00:01:11.904
(upbeat music)
00:01:20.100 --> 00:01:23.400
Here are three that I came
up with. Disadvantage, right?
00:01:23.400 --> 00:01:25.050
The opposite of advantage.
00:01:25.050 --> 00:01:27.240
This is when something is
making things harder for you,
00:01:27.240 --> 00:01:28.950
like your opponent in a foot race,
00:01:28.950 --> 00:01:32.010
getting a three minute
headstart, for example.
00:01:32.010 --> 00:01:33.510
Advance is a verb.
00:01:33.510 --> 00:01:37.440
It means to go forward
or to go onward or up.
00:01:37.440 --> 00:01:39.720
And vantage, this noun is usually part
00:01:39.720 --> 00:01:42.150
of the phrase "vantage point".
00:01:42.150 --> 00:01:45.030
It means a good spot, to view things from.
00:01:45.030 --> 00:01:48.270
The top of a hill is a great
vantage point from which
00:01:48.270 --> 00:01:51.540
to watch a fireworks display, for example.
00:01:51.540 --> 00:01:54.303
All right, let's use
advantage in a few sentences.
00:01:55.320 --> 00:01:58.800
Elias P Beanpole, the
tallest boy in 6th grade
00:01:58.800 --> 00:02:02.040
had a distinct advantage
on the basketball court.
00:02:02.040 --> 00:02:04.800
He was like 20 feet tall. He
could dunk from half court.
00:02:04.800 --> 00:02:08.910
That was his advantage. That's
his superior position, right?
00:02:08.910 --> 00:02:11.130
But he did keep bonking
his head on the ceiling,
00:02:11.130 --> 00:02:13.800
which I would say is a
distinct disadvantage
00:02:13.800 --> 00:02:15.067
to being that tall.
00:02:15.067 --> 00:02:18.060
"Listen, just because my mom
runs a candy shop doesn't
00:02:18.060 --> 00:02:20.880
mean you could take
advantage of our friendship."
00:02:20.880 --> 00:02:22.830
To take advantage of an opportunity is
00:02:22.830 --> 00:02:24.900
to get some benefit from it,
00:02:24.900 --> 00:02:26.580
but not always in a fair way.
00:02:26.580 --> 00:02:28.050
To take advantage of a friendship
00:02:28.050 --> 00:02:29.017
is to say something like,
00:02:29.017 --> 00:02:31.620
"Hey, your mom has that candy shop.
00:02:31.620 --> 00:02:34.440
How do you feel about
hooking up your friend David
00:02:34.440 --> 00:02:36.210
with some free candy, hmm?"
00:02:36.210 --> 00:02:37.320
You do that enough times
00:02:37.320 --> 00:02:38.520
and you're probably going
00:02:38.520 --> 00:02:41.373
to exhaust your friend
and your friendship.
00:02:42.330 --> 00:02:45.030
Taking advantage doesn't have
to have a negative connotation
00:02:45.030 --> 00:02:48.000
or feeling, though, you could
take advantage of a windy day
00:02:48.000 --> 00:02:50.970
and fly a kite or take
advantage of a rainy day
00:02:50.970 --> 00:02:53.070
and play a board game, that kind of thing.
00:02:53.906 --> 00:02:58.350
I hope you take advantage of
these videos, dear wordsmiths,
00:02:58.350 --> 00:03:00.843
and realize that you can learn anything.
00:03:01.800 --> 00:03:02.633
David out.
|
Strategic | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6UF65aetSs8 | vtt | https://www.youtube.com/api/timedtext?v=6UF65aetSs8&ei=n1WUZYWoGsuJp-oP_oO6IA&caps=asr&opi=112496729&xoaf=5&hl=en&ip=0.0.0.0&ipbits=0&expire=1704245263&sparams=ip%2Cipbits%2Cexpire%2Cv%2Cei%2Ccaps%2Copi%2Cxoaf&signature=391D13EEC10BFD0A8DE5A1BCBC977776A201880E.1CA29B151447C0C6C871847476B4CB3A4A8FD5E0&key=yt8&lang=en&name=Default&fmt=vtt | en | WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en
00:00:00.240 --> 00:00:03.203
- [Narrator] I love it
when a plan comes together,
00:00:03.203 --> 00:00:04.470
wordsmiths, because the word I'm featuring
00:00:04.470 --> 00:00:06.477
in this video is strategic.
00:00:08.675 --> 00:00:09.508
Strategic.
00:00:10.380 --> 00:00:13.110
It's an adjective and it
means related to a plan.
00:00:13.110 --> 00:00:16.080
It's the adjective form of
strategy, which is a way
00:00:16.080 --> 00:00:19.290
of thinking about making
effective and successful plans
00:00:19.290 --> 00:00:20.730
or the plan itself.
00:00:20.730 --> 00:00:22.650
Strategic comes from Greek,
00:00:22.650 --> 00:00:24.900
the word strategos means general,
00:00:24.900 --> 00:00:27.270
as in the commander of an army.
00:00:27.270 --> 00:00:29.670
Being strategic means you're
thinking like a general
00:00:29.670 --> 00:00:32.550
commanding troops, like you're
trying to play five games
00:00:32.550 --> 00:00:34.620
of chess at once.
00:00:34.620 --> 00:00:38.730
The ic part, the I-C part is
an adjective forming suffix,
00:00:38.730 --> 00:00:42.360
so it turns nouns into
modifiers, into adjectives.
00:00:42.360 --> 00:00:45.423
So strategic means like a general.
00:00:46.800 --> 00:00:49.380
What do you see from these word parts?
00:00:49.380 --> 00:00:52.620
What do you see in strateg and ic?
00:00:52.620 --> 00:00:55.650
I'll give you 10 seconds to
come up with similar words.
00:00:55.650 --> 00:00:57.513
Throw in a little music, here we go.
00:00:58.574 --> 00:01:01.157
(upbeat music)
00:01:08.250 --> 00:01:09.390
Here's what I came up with.
00:01:09.390 --> 00:01:12.030
There's stratagem, which is like a trick
00:01:12.030 --> 00:01:14.280
or a cutting little
plan that you pull off.
00:01:14.280 --> 00:01:16.920
In other words, a maneuver.
00:01:16.920 --> 00:01:20.280
Cosmic, which means it has to
do with outer space, right?
00:01:20.280 --> 00:01:23.400
It's the the word cosmos plus ic,
00:01:23.400 --> 00:01:25.710
the adjective forming suffix.
00:01:25.710 --> 00:01:27.690
Cosmos is outer space.
00:01:27.690 --> 00:01:31.500
Strategize, which is the verb
form of strategic or strategy.
00:01:31.500 --> 00:01:34.563
It means to make plans, to
come up with a strategy.
00:01:35.802 --> 00:01:37.740
Okay, troops, follow me
over to the next screen
00:01:37.740 --> 00:01:42.360
where we'll use strategic
in a few sentences, hoo-ah.
00:01:42.360 --> 00:01:45.000
If you're strategic with your
chocolate chip placement,
00:01:45.000 --> 00:01:47.670
you can use cookies to spell words.
00:01:47.670 --> 00:01:50.460
This one appears to say Khan.
00:01:50.460 --> 00:01:52.740
If you're clever about
it, if you've thought
00:01:52.740 --> 00:01:56.460
through the plan and its
implications, if you're strategic,
00:01:56.460 --> 00:02:00.150
you can create cookie
mischief, which is probably one
00:02:00.150 --> 00:02:02.820
of the 10 best kinds of mischief.
00:02:02.820 --> 00:02:06.123
Okay, let's try it as
a noun now as strategy.
00:02:07.080 --> 00:02:10.560
After three straight days of
failure, the scientists decided
00:02:10.560 --> 00:02:13.080
to attempt a new strategy.
00:02:13.080 --> 00:02:15.210
What was that strategy? I don't know.
00:02:15.210 --> 00:02:16.740
I didn't read the lab notes
00:02:16.740 --> 00:02:18.720
and it kind of appears as
if those lab notes have
00:02:18.720 --> 00:02:22.920
gone into the trash. But
here's what I do know.
00:02:22.920 --> 00:02:26.077
You can learn anything,
wordsmiths, David out.
|
Effective | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NIHVc8Y0I3s | vtt | https://www.youtube.com/api/timedtext?v=NIHVc8Y0I3s&ei=n1WUZfewIOSOvdIP9OOBEA&caps=asr&opi=112496729&xoaf=5&hl=en&ip=0.0.0.0&ipbits=0&expire=1704245263&sparams=ip%2Cipbits%2Cexpire%2Cv%2Cei%2Ccaps%2Copi%2Cxoaf&signature=DF4B46CB99CD316D2160CE8DAB3573F2E885E7AE.A9954063B95FC91260074DD78BFADA400F013EAC&key=yt8&lang=en&name=Default&fmt=vtt | en | WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en
00:00:00.870 --> 00:00:02.580
- [David] This one's
gonna work like a charm,
00:00:02.580 --> 00:00:04.530
wordsmiths, because the
word we're featuring
00:00:04.530 --> 00:00:07.245
in this video is effective.
00:00:07.245 --> 00:00:11.280
Effective, it's an adjective
meaning successful,
00:00:11.280 --> 00:00:12.690
good at something.
00:00:12.690 --> 00:00:16.170
The etymology, the derivation
of this word helps explain it,
00:00:16.170 --> 00:00:17.003
I think.
00:00:17.003 --> 00:00:18.660
Three Latin parts.
00:00:18.660 --> 00:00:23.660
First one, "ef" is a modified
form of ex, meaning out.
00:00:24.540 --> 00:00:27.750
The second one, "fect," or fact,
00:00:27.750 --> 00:00:32.280
comes from a Latin verb
that means to make, right?
00:00:32.280 --> 00:00:35.280
And just those two on their
own give us effect, right?
00:00:35.280 --> 00:00:38.790
An effect is an outcome, a
thing that you made happen,
00:00:38.790 --> 00:00:41.250
what comes out of a process.
00:00:41.250 --> 00:00:43.789
I hit a watermelon with a baseball bat.
00:00:43.789 --> 00:00:44.622
(melon splatting)
00:00:44.622 --> 00:00:47.040
That's a sound effect, right?
00:00:47.040 --> 00:00:50.010
Oh, okay, and finally, I-V-E, "ive,"
00:00:50.010 --> 00:00:52.560
an adjective forming suffix.
00:00:52.560 --> 00:00:54.990
It has a meaning of tending to.
00:00:54.990 --> 00:00:57.090
Something that is effective tends to,
00:00:57.090 --> 00:00:59.970
or has the quality of
making things happen,
00:00:59.970 --> 00:01:03.420
of making outcomes easily, powerfully.
00:01:03.420 --> 00:01:06.720
All right, let's look for
similar related words.
00:01:06.720 --> 00:01:08.760
Think of some words that have that E-F-F,
00:01:08.760 --> 00:01:12.420
that eff beginning, or
fect or fact in them,
00:01:12.420 --> 00:01:14.733
or end in I-V-E, end in ive.
00:01:16.050 --> 00:01:18.330
I'll put on some music. 10 seconds.
00:01:18.330 --> 00:01:19.534
Here we go.
00:01:19.534 --> 00:01:22.117
(upbeat music)
00:01:30.270 --> 00:01:32.430
So here are three that I came up with.
00:01:32.430 --> 00:01:36.150
Effusive, this is an
adjective meaning pouring out,
00:01:36.150 --> 00:01:40.200
like you might shower
someone with effusive praise.
00:01:40.200 --> 00:01:42.210
It has that eff prefix, right?
00:01:42.210 --> 00:01:45.540
The modified form of ex, meaning out.
00:01:45.540 --> 00:01:49.410
Then confection, this word
means candy or sweets,
00:01:49.410 --> 00:01:50.940
though it literally means a thing
00:01:50.940 --> 00:01:52.650
that is made together, right?
00:01:52.650 --> 00:01:57.650
Confection, a mixed thing,
a combination of sweets.
00:01:57.690 --> 00:02:00.390
And a third related word is factory,
00:02:00.390 --> 00:02:02.640
a place where things are made,
00:02:02.640 --> 00:02:06.390
a shoe factory, a chocolate
factory, a car factory.
00:02:06.390 --> 00:02:10.470
That ory ending, O-R-Y,
is a noun-forming suffix
00:02:10.470 --> 00:02:15.470
that means a place for, like
laboratory or observatory.
00:02:15.750 --> 00:02:18.840
Let's use the word effective
in a sentence or two.
00:02:18.840 --> 00:02:22.290
Marisa realized how effective
her marketing campaign
00:02:22.290 --> 00:02:25.980
had been when she saw the line
stretching around the block.
00:02:25.980 --> 00:02:29.010
It worked extremely well,
the marketing campaign did,
00:02:29.010 --> 00:02:31.380
and now everyone wants to buy her donuts.
00:02:31.380 --> 00:02:34.473
Donuts, the universal food.
Let me show you another one.
00:02:35.400 --> 00:02:36.960
The article that Devon wrote
00:02:36.960 --> 00:02:40.680
about IckyCorp's scummy labor
practices was so effective
00:02:40.680 --> 00:02:42.483
that it put them out of business.
00:02:43.530 --> 00:02:45.090
Nobody wanted to work with them anymore,
00:02:45.090 --> 00:02:48.120
these weird business blobs
00:02:48.120 --> 00:02:50.223
that leave a trail of goo.
00:02:51.300 --> 00:02:53.220
I wonder what they made at IckyCorp.
00:02:53.220 --> 00:02:55.773
Actually, no, no, I do not wanna know.
00:02:57.240 --> 00:02:58.680
But here's what I do wanna know.
00:02:58.680 --> 00:03:03.513
I want you to know that you
can learn anything. David out.
|
Interwoven | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nv5eDkkca9A | vtt | https://www.youtube.com/api/timedtext?v=nv5eDkkca9A&ei=n1WUZbKbH4vXxwL92KCAAw&caps=asr&opi=112496729&xoaf=5&hl=en&ip=0.0.0.0&ipbits=0&expire=1704245263&sparams=ip%2Cipbits%2Cexpire%2Cv%2Cei%2Ccaps%2Copi%2Cxoaf&signature=8B95F816D2F85D14933FF7EF540CB63D92787D77.79769D2EC68548426ACC1F08E7EAD56C71D64EC7&key=yt8&lang=en&name=Default&fmt=vtt | en | WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en
00:00:00.930 --> 00:00:03.240
- [David] I've got a
twisted tale to tell you
00:00:03.240 --> 00:00:05.610
in this video, Wordsmiths,
because the word I want
00:00:05.610 --> 00:00:09.133
to talk about is interwoven, interwoven.
00:00:11.520 --> 00:00:15.990
It's an adjective and it means
twisted or joined together
00:00:15.990 --> 00:00:19.800
and it has a literal meaning
like two fibers woven
00:00:19.800 --> 00:00:22.650
into the same carpet, but it
also has a figurative one,
00:00:22.650 --> 00:00:25.320
like the strands of two
families joining together
00:00:25.320 --> 00:00:26.920
when their children get married.
00:00:27.780 --> 00:00:30.930
Let's talk about the word parts here.
00:00:30.930 --> 00:00:35.073
We've got inter, which
means between or among,
00:00:36.000 --> 00:00:37.770
and interaction, right?
00:00:37.770 --> 00:00:40.320
Is action between two or more things,
00:00:40.320 --> 00:00:42.750
and intercom is a device that allows you
00:00:42.750 --> 00:00:46.140
to communicate within
a building or similar,
00:00:46.140 --> 00:00:49.200
and woven is the past
tense form of to weave.
00:00:49.200 --> 00:00:52.740
Weaving is when you make
fabric out of threads by inter,
00:00:52.740 --> 00:00:57.330
huh, inter, interlacing them
on a machine called the loom.
00:00:57.330 --> 00:00:59.460
I was just in a fabric workshop,
here's a picture I took
00:00:59.460 --> 00:01:01.050
of a loom from the other day.
00:01:01.050 --> 00:01:04.200
The threads are under tension
and you plate them together
00:01:04.200 --> 00:01:07.920
and if you do that enough times,
you have a piece of fabric.
00:01:07.920 --> 00:01:11.490
A weave in the noun
form is a hair extension
00:01:11.490 --> 00:01:15.390
or it can be the pattern that
you make by weaving something.
00:01:15.390 --> 00:01:18.900
Let's weave these word
parts into other words.
00:01:18.900 --> 00:01:21.120
Leaving weave aside for
now, what are some words
00:01:21.120 --> 00:01:24.750
that you can think of
that use the prefix inter?
00:01:24.750 --> 00:01:28.440
I'll put on some music, meet
me back here in 10 seconds.
00:01:28.440 --> 00:01:31.693
All right, let's do it.
(upbeat music)
00:01:40.470 --> 00:01:42.750
Here are three that I came up with.
00:01:42.750 --> 00:01:46.260
Interrelated, an adjective that
means two things are related
00:01:46.260 --> 00:01:47.160
to one another, right?
00:01:47.160 --> 00:01:49.410
There's a connection between them.
00:01:49.410 --> 00:01:53.190
An intersection, a crossroads
where two roads cut
00:01:53.190 --> 00:01:55.650
into each other, that's what sect means,
00:01:55.650 --> 00:01:59.910
it's from secare, to cut, so intersection.
00:01:59.910 --> 00:02:02.040
Intercept, which is a verb that means
00:02:02.040 --> 00:02:04.290
to catch something on its
way to somewhere else.
00:02:04.290 --> 00:02:06.990
You can intercept a ball
and snatch it out of the air
00:02:06.990 --> 00:02:09.930
while it's passing between two places
00:02:09.930 --> 00:02:13.440
or a spy can intercept a secret message.
00:02:13.440 --> 00:02:15.150
Oh no, that spy has made a way
00:02:15.150 --> 00:02:17.700
with that top secret communique.
00:02:17.700 --> 00:02:19.770
Oh no, he's disappeared.
00:02:19.770 --> 00:02:22.740
Let's use interwoven in a few sentences.
00:02:22.740 --> 00:02:24.213
Here's a literal use.
00:02:25.200 --> 00:02:28.440
In this pattern, blue
threads are interwoven
00:02:28.440 --> 00:02:30.060
with pink, right?
00:02:30.060 --> 00:02:30.960
If you do this enough times,
00:02:30.960 --> 00:02:33.390
you can sort of see
where plaid comes from.
00:02:33.390 --> 00:02:36.480
The strands are literally woven together,
00:02:36.480 --> 00:02:40.260
but here's a figurative use of the word.
00:02:40.260 --> 00:02:43.590
The food traditions of Italy
and India are interwoven
00:02:43.590 --> 00:02:47.250
in my dad's signature dish, pizza curry.
00:02:47.250 --> 00:02:48.810
In this case, it's traditions
00:02:48.810 --> 00:02:50.250
that have been twisted together
00:02:50.250 --> 00:02:53.070
rather than literal strands of thread.
00:02:53.070 --> 00:02:55.620
Curry pizza is a real thing, by the way,
00:02:55.620 --> 00:02:58.590
if you've never had it
and it's incredible.
00:02:58.590 --> 00:03:01.440
Dip a piece of cheese
pizza into saag paneer
00:03:01.440 --> 00:03:02.820
and thank me later.
00:03:02.820 --> 00:03:04.890
Listen, Wordsmiths, I'm just here to help
00:03:04.890 --> 00:03:08.370
in matters food related and
in matters word related,
00:03:08.370 --> 00:03:12.123
and you're just here because
you can learn anything.
00:03:12.960 --> 00:03:13.793
David, out.
|
Heritage | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ttbflLOXGM | vtt | https://www.youtube.com/api/timedtext?v=9ttbflLOXGM&ei=n1WUZcKWGsD6vdIPtt2SkAs&caps=asr&opi=112496729&xoaf=5&hl=en&ip=0.0.0.0&ipbits=0&expire=1704245263&sparams=ip%2Cipbits%2Cexpire%2Cv%2Cei%2Ccaps%2Copi%2Cxoaf&signature=66FFA484A362B1A08C532615B3A9F1561AA0216F.9F6BEE7DB4DE1893BB67489E10A16A93B839C7D6&key=yt8&lang=en&name=Default&fmt=vtt | en | WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en
00:00:00.750 --> 00:00:03.360
- [David] It's time to
explore our roots, wordsmiths,
00:00:03.360 --> 00:00:04.950
our backgrounds, where we came from.
00:00:04.950 --> 00:00:07.440
Because the word I'm
bringing you in this video
00:00:07.440 --> 00:00:09.732
is "heritage".
00:00:09.732 --> 00:00:12.150
Mind you, we're always exploring our roots
00:00:12.150 --> 00:00:13.560
when it comes to vocabulary.
00:00:13.560 --> 00:00:15.210
Huh? All right.
00:00:15.210 --> 00:00:18.240
Her-i-tage, it's a noun.
00:00:18.240 --> 00:00:19.530
It means a birthright.
00:00:19.530 --> 00:00:22.200
Traditions or goods
granted to you by relatives
00:00:22.200 --> 00:00:23.670
or cultural ancestors.
00:00:23.670 --> 00:00:26.670
For example, I have Lithuanian heritage.
00:00:26.670 --> 00:00:29.790
Here's a map of the Baltic
Sea. There's Lithuania.
00:00:29.790 --> 00:00:31.440
Some of my ancestors came from there.
00:00:31.440 --> 00:00:33.780
This country in Eastern Europe.
00:00:33.780 --> 00:00:36.270
That's part of my heritage.
00:00:36.270 --> 00:00:39.150
Let's talk about the
derivation of this word.
00:00:39.150 --> 00:00:40.920
It comes from French.
00:00:40.920 --> 00:00:42.270
Many words in English do,
00:00:42.270 --> 00:00:45.630
because about 900 years ago,
the French invaded England
00:00:45.630 --> 00:00:48.030
and took their language
along for the ride.
00:00:48.030 --> 00:00:50.940
So heritage is itself of French origin.
00:00:50.940 --> 00:00:53.580
But we can break that down
further into "heriter"
00:00:53.580 --> 00:00:55.729
which is a verb that means to inherit,
00:00:55.729 --> 00:00:57.972
to receive something from a relative
00:00:57.972 --> 00:01:01.410
and a-g-e which is a noun forming suffix.
00:01:01.410 --> 00:01:03.330
It's pronounced aj in French, in English,
00:01:03.330 --> 00:01:05.550
it's pronounced ij, right?
00:01:05.550 --> 00:01:09.600
Like an ij you scratch. It
can turn verbs into nouns.
00:01:09.600 --> 00:01:11.010
For example, turning the verb
00:01:11.010 --> 00:01:13.770
to marry into the noun, marriage.
00:01:13.770 --> 00:01:16.213
So inherit plus a-g-e
00:01:16.213 --> 00:01:19.373
equals the thing you inherit, right?
00:01:19.373 --> 00:01:24.330
Herit-age, heritage. So we've
got these two word parts.
00:01:24.330 --> 00:01:28.080
Can you think of words
that sound similar to herit
00:01:28.080 --> 00:01:32.700
and a-g-e and ij that
use those word parts?
00:01:32.700 --> 00:01:34.890
I'll give you 10 seconds
to come up with a few.
00:01:34.890 --> 00:01:38.007
Doesn't have to be a lot.
Okay, commence the music.
00:01:38.007 --> 00:01:40.924
(soft funky music)
00:01:48.540 --> 00:01:50.460
Here are some that I came up with.
00:01:50.460 --> 00:01:53.160
Inheritance, which is
the property you inherit
00:01:53.160 --> 00:01:54.547
when someone dies.
00:01:54.547 --> 00:01:57.322
"Ance" is another noun forming suffix.
00:01:57.322 --> 00:01:59.430
Wreckage is a noun.
00:01:59.430 --> 00:02:02.190
It's what's left after something
has been wrecked, right?
00:02:02.190 --> 00:02:04.170
The remnants of something
that's been destroyed.
00:02:04.170 --> 00:02:07.200
We took the verb to wreck to destroy
00:02:07.200 --> 00:02:11.343
and added a-g-e to make it
a noun, to make it wreckage.
00:02:12.750 --> 00:02:17.730
An heirloom. Herit and heir,
h-e-i-r are related words.
00:02:17.730 --> 00:02:20.310
And an heirloom is a
treasured piece of inheritance
00:02:20.310 --> 00:02:22.824
that passes down through a family.
00:02:22.824 --> 00:02:26.670
Let's use the word heritage
in a sentence or two.
00:02:26.670 --> 00:02:29.400
Adewale's family heritage was writing.
00:02:29.400 --> 00:02:31.020
His mother is a screenwriter
00:02:31.020 --> 00:02:33.270
and his grandfather was a playwright.
00:02:33.270 --> 00:02:35.523
It's a family tradition for him, you see,
00:02:36.690 --> 00:02:39.450
there's Adewale, there's his mom
00:02:39.450 --> 00:02:40.743
and there's her dad.
00:02:41.580 --> 00:02:43.140
This is also a typewriter,
00:02:43.140 --> 00:02:46.080
for those of you too young
to know what a typewriter is.
00:02:46.080 --> 00:02:47.580
It's the machine that goes clicky, clicky,
00:02:47.580 --> 00:02:48.810
click clicky, ding ding, ding.
00:02:48.810 --> 00:02:50.175
You make the words.
00:02:50.175 --> 00:02:53.130
I feel like that's self-explanatory.
00:02:53.130 --> 00:02:56.730
So that's being used for an
individual or a family, right?
00:02:56.730 --> 00:02:58.950
A family context, Adewale's family.
00:02:58.950 --> 00:03:02.673
But let's use it in a
wider national context.
00:03:03.750 --> 00:03:05.790
Many foods that we think of
00:03:05.790 --> 00:03:08.400
as uniquely American originated elsewhere.
00:03:08.400 --> 00:03:11.553
But we can claim Cajun chef
Paul Prudhomme's turducken.
00:03:12.517 --> 00:03:14.880
A chicken stuffed inside a
duck, stuffed inside a Turkey
00:03:14.880 --> 00:03:17.670
as part of our cultural heritage.
00:03:17.670 --> 00:03:20.100
Here I have drawn a handy cutaway diagram.
00:03:20.100 --> 00:03:23.550
You see in here in the
middle, that's the chicken.
00:03:23.550 --> 00:03:26.370
This purple layer here
represents the duck.
00:03:26.370 --> 00:03:29.610
And of course, this outer
layer, the mantle of the earth
00:03:29.610 --> 00:03:32.040
represents the Turkey.
00:03:32.040 --> 00:03:35.122
And this represents a
hungry individual who wishes
00:03:35.122 --> 00:03:36.603
to eat the turducken.
00:03:38.550 --> 00:03:40.470
But more to the point,
what I'm trying to say is
00:03:40.470 --> 00:03:42.720
that the turducken represents something
00:03:42.720 --> 00:03:45.090
that is unique to America.
00:03:45.090 --> 00:03:48.450
It is part of the United States cultural
00:03:48.450 --> 00:03:50.490
and culinary heritage.
00:03:50.490 --> 00:03:52.920
It's part of our food heritage.
00:03:52.920 --> 00:03:56.040
Now, I have never had
the buck wild pleasure
00:03:56.040 --> 00:03:59.940
of eating a turducken but
I hear it is delicious.
00:03:59.940 --> 00:04:03.630
So support your local mad
scientist chef, wordsmiths,
00:04:03.630 --> 00:04:05.700
and I'll catch you next time.
00:04:05.700 --> 00:04:07.953
You can learn anything. David, out.
|
Esteem | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=boB0GiMrS_Q | vtt | https://www.youtube.com/api/timedtext?v=boB0GiMrS_Q&ei=n1WUZcD_Gq6Ap-oP6tuLMA&caps=asr&opi=112496729&xoaf=5&hl=en&ip=0.0.0.0&ipbits=0&expire=1704245263&sparams=ip%2Cipbits%2Cexpire%2Cv%2Cei%2Ccaps%2Copi%2Cxoaf&signature=E744C48A177791BF5EB0812ED767E659C1763AC0.C323E167B186DFBCE00104D552EAAC583F4942C6&key=yt8&lang=en&name=Default&fmt=vtt | en | WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en
00:00:00.270 --> 00:00:01.590
- Hey there, wordsmiths.
00:00:01.590 --> 00:00:04.890
I must tell you, I feel
quite good about this word.
00:00:04.890 --> 00:00:06.340
Esteem.
00:00:06.340 --> 00:00:08.430
Esteem.
00:00:08.430 --> 00:00:10.380
It's a noun. It means respect.
00:00:10.380 --> 00:00:12.300
You can hold someone in high esteem,
00:00:12.300 --> 00:00:14.580
which means you have a
lot of respect for them,
00:00:14.580 --> 00:00:18.357
or you can have high self-esteem,
respect for yourself.
00:00:18.357 --> 00:00:20.610
This word comes from the French estimer,
00:00:20.610 --> 00:00:22.590
which means to appraise
00:00:22.590 --> 00:00:25.052
and to guess at the value of something.
00:00:25.052 --> 00:00:27.990
This was indeed the original meaning
00:00:27.990 --> 00:00:31.151
of esteem was worth or value.
00:00:31.151 --> 00:00:33.219
Let's come up with some similar words.
00:00:33.219 --> 00:00:34.851
What words can you think of
00:00:34.851 --> 00:00:38.040
that can contain a similar root to esteem?
00:00:38.040 --> 00:00:41.550
I'm thinking about that E-S-T especially.
00:00:41.550 --> 00:00:42.930
I'll give you 10 seconds.
00:00:42.930 --> 00:00:44.461
Okay, here we go.
00:00:44.461 --> 00:00:47.044
(upbeat music)
00:00:55.170 --> 00:00:56.850
Okay, here's what I came up with.
00:00:56.850 --> 00:01:00.510
There's estimate, which
means to make a rough guess,
00:01:00.510 --> 00:01:03.960
like estimating how many jelly
beans are in a jar, right?
00:01:03.960 --> 00:01:06.720
Tying it back to the root when
you're estimating something,
00:01:06.720 --> 00:01:09.510
you're guessing at its value or its worth,
00:01:09.510 --> 00:01:12.231
or how many jelly beans there are.
00:01:12.231 --> 00:01:14.460
Esteemed, which is another way of saying
00:01:14.460 --> 00:01:17.160
the famous or the well-respected.
00:01:17.160 --> 00:01:19.050
That's how I talk about
my work friends sometimes.
00:01:19.050 --> 00:01:21.480
I'll be like, oh yeah, my
esteemed colleague, Heather,
00:01:21.480 --> 00:01:23.246
She rules. Hi, Heather.
00:01:23.246 --> 00:01:26.585
Inestimable, which means
something so precious
00:01:26.585 --> 00:01:30.660
that it can't even be given
a value, like a diamond,
00:01:30.660 --> 00:01:33.540
the size of a small dog,
or my belief in you.
00:01:33.540 --> 00:01:36.390
Let's use esteem in a sentence or two.
00:01:36.390 --> 00:01:39.600
Juanita held her mother's
sculptures in high esteem,
00:01:39.600 --> 00:01:42.840
though the art world
never seemed to get them.
00:01:42.840 --> 00:01:44.310
She respects them a lot.
00:01:44.310 --> 00:01:46.200
That's what that conventional
expression means,
00:01:46.200 --> 00:01:47.880
to hold something in high esteem
00:01:47.880 --> 00:01:50.280
is you really, really like it,
00:01:50.280 --> 00:01:51.360
and that doesn't have to be things.
00:01:51.360 --> 00:01:52.410
That can also be people.
00:01:52.410 --> 00:01:54.990
You can hold a person in high esteem.
00:01:54.990 --> 00:01:55.950
Let's do another one.
00:01:55.950 --> 00:01:58.050
Brolus the Troll saw a therapist
00:01:58.050 --> 00:02:01.139
to talk through his
feelings of low self-esteem.
00:02:01.139 --> 00:02:02.490
Good job, Brolus.
00:02:02.490 --> 00:02:04.680
It's never too late to
take care of yourself.
00:02:04.680 --> 00:02:05.513
In this house,
00:02:05.513 --> 00:02:08.180
we support trolls that
take care of themselves.
00:02:08.180 --> 00:02:11.366
Wordsmiths. I hope you know
the value that you possess.
00:02:11.366 --> 00:02:12.900
It is inestimable.
00:02:12.900 --> 00:02:14.937
It is beyond number.
00:02:14.937 --> 00:02:17.280
Remember that when you're feeling low.
00:02:17.280 --> 00:02:18.480
I believe in you,
00:02:18.480 --> 00:02:21.303
and I also believe that
you can learn anything.
00:02:22.230 --> 00:02:23.063
David out.
|
Perceive | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NiaCGBX9Zig | vtt | https://www.youtube.com/api/timedtext?v=NiaCGBX9Zig&ei=n1WUZaOMIPDpxN8Pk8a3UA&caps=asr&opi=112496729&xoaf=5&hl=en&ip=0.0.0.0&ipbits=0&expire=1704245263&sparams=ip%2Cipbits%2Cexpire%2Cv%2Cei%2Ccaps%2Copi%2Cxoaf&signature=168BE810B6AC0C8EC220845CA7A292133F472228.225DF631DF633122BCC61073C3FD697D41612669&key=yt8&lang=en&name=Default&fmt=vtt | en | WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en
00:00:00.300 --> 00:00:03.060
- [David] Open your minds, wordsmiths.
00:00:03.060 --> 00:00:05.670
We're talking about the word perceive.
00:00:05.670 --> 00:00:08.310
Ah, it's one of those E before I words,
00:00:08.310 --> 00:00:10.290
some of the hardest to spell in English.
00:00:10.290 --> 00:00:12.423
Perceive is a verb.
00:00:13.350 --> 00:00:15.510
This verb means to notice something.
00:00:15.510 --> 00:00:18.930
You might also know it from
its noun form, perception.
00:00:18.930 --> 00:00:19.763
Perception.
00:00:20.670 --> 00:00:22.740
It's a non-specific way of saying
00:00:22.740 --> 00:00:25.110
that your senses are picking something up.
00:00:25.110 --> 00:00:30.030
You can perceive sights, smells,
tastes, sounds, feelings.
00:00:30.030 --> 00:00:33.360
Perception, perceiving,
covers all of that.
00:00:33.360 --> 00:00:36.120
So this comes from Latin. All of it does.
00:00:36.120 --> 00:00:38.580
Because of the E before
I thing in the verb form,
00:00:38.580 --> 00:00:41.100
I think it's a little easier
to break it down as a noun,
00:00:41.100 --> 00:00:43.710
so let's look at perception.
00:00:43.710 --> 00:00:48.543
So per is a prefix that
means completely or through.
00:00:49.440 --> 00:00:51.900
The cept part comes from capita,
00:00:51.900 --> 00:00:54.720
which you might also see as capt, C-A-P-T.
00:00:54.720 --> 00:00:57.180
It means to grasp, to grab.
00:00:57.180 --> 00:01:00.390
And ion is a noun-forming suffix, right,
00:01:00.390 --> 00:01:03.630
an ending that turns
other words into nouns.
00:01:03.630 --> 00:01:08.040
So perception is when you
grasp something completely,
00:01:08.040 --> 00:01:09.513
when you understand it.
00:01:10.500 --> 00:01:13.140
Let's take 10 seconds and come
up with some similar words
00:01:13.140 --> 00:01:18.140
that contain these elements,
per and capt and ion.
00:01:18.330 --> 00:01:20.810
Three, two, one. Let's jam.
00:01:20.810 --> 00:01:24.143
(cheerful upbeat music)
00:01:34.240 --> 00:01:36.330
Okay, here's some I came up with.
00:01:36.330 --> 00:01:39.210
Pervasive, an adjective
meaning everywhere.
00:01:39.210 --> 00:01:41.850
Per means through and vadere means to go.
00:01:41.850 --> 00:01:44.820
Compare the word invade, right, to go in.
00:01:44.820 --> 00:01:46.710
So something that's pervasive
00:01:46.710 --> 00:01:49.680
has completely gone through a community.
00:01:49.680 --> 00:01:54.300
Pervasive influence, pervasive
illness, pervasive trends.
00:01:54.300 --> 00:01:58.140
Capture, a verb meaning
to grab, to take by force.
00:01:58.140 --> 00:02:01.530
This is probably as close a
direct English translation
00:02:01.530 --> 00:02:03.723
as you can get of the Latin verb capere.
00:02:04.620 --> 00:02:07.800
Reception, a noun meaning
getting something,
00:02:07.800 --> 00:02:09.090
receiving a thing.
00:02:09.090 --> 00:02:11.520
You might have bad
reception in the dining room
00:02:11.520 --> 00:02:13.200
because the Wi-Fi is weak there.
00:02:13.200 --> 00:02:15.720
Or reception can mean a formal event
00:02:15.720 --> 00:02:17.340
like a wedding reception.
00:02:17.340 --> 00:02:19.740
The thing you are receiving is partygoers.
00:02:19.740 --> 00:02:22.560
You are welcoming them
to celebrate with you.
00:02:22.560 --> 00:02:26.400
Let's use perception and perceive
in a couple of sentences.
00:02:26.400 --> 00:02:28.890
Thanks to his keen powers of perception,
00:02:28.890 --> 00:02:30.960
Walter saw that the bridge
was about to collapse
00:02:30.960 --> 00:02:32.850
and kept everyone away.
00:02:32.850 --> 00:02:34.830
He saw it. He noticed it, right?
00:02:34.830 --> 00:02:36.157
He looked at the bridge and he was like,
00:02:36.157 --> 00:02:40.020
"That structural beam exhibits
signs of metal fatigue."
00:02:40.020 --> 00:02:43.170
Good eye, Walter. Thanks for saving lives.
00:02:43.170 --> 00:02:44.340
Let's do another one.
00:02:44.340 --> 00:02:47.820
Using her psychic powers,
Jade perceived Vivek
00:02:47.820 --> 00:02:49.590
before he entered the room.
00:02:49.590 --> 00:02:53.250
Right, she's sensing
him with, in this case,
00:02:53.250 --> 00:02:55.200
her psychic powers.
00:02:55.200 --> 00:02:57.210
And, of course, another
term for psychic powers
00:02:57.210 --> 00:02:59.790
is extrasensory perception.
00:02:59.790 --> 00:03:02.790
Hmm? What we used to call the sixth sense.
00:03:02.790 --> 00:03:04.860
That's right, I'm putting
more content in the outro.
00:03:04.860 --> 00:03:05.880
Try to stop me.
00:03:05.880 --> 00:03:08.940
Oh right, I forgot. I cannot be stopped.
00:03:08.940 --> 00:03:13.593
But you can't either because
you can learn anything.
00:03:14.520 --> 00:03:15.353
David out.
|
Collective | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08ezdqrSSIg | vtt | https://www.youtube.com/api/timedtext?v=08ezdqrSSIg&ei=n1WUZemVIbfCp-oPkMmV2Aw&caps=asr&opi=112496729&xoaf=5&hl=en&ip=0.0.0.0&ipbits=0&expire=1704245263&sparams=ip%2Cipbits%2Cexpire%2Cv%2Cei%2Ccaps%2Copi%2Cxoaf&signature=97B15A170409A3232C72942DE1FA7E418E51D858.07F7159396EA47A0D68F9162D64E93335F91E2B0&key=yt8&lang=en&name=Default&fmt=vtt | en | WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en
00:00:00.360 --> 00:00:02.910
- [David] It's time to
come together, wordsmiths.
00:00:02.910 --> 00:00:06.398
The word we'll go through in
this video is "collective."
00:00:06.398 --> 00:00:09.573
Collective, it's an adjective.
00:00:10.770 --> 00:00:14.220
It means, something done
together by everyone in a group,
00:00:14.220 --> 00:00:16.590
like, "We made a collective decision
00:00:16.590 --> 00:00:18.330
that sea slugs should be our mascot."
00:00:18.330 --> 00:00:20.640
We did it together, right?
00:00:20.640 --> 00:00:23.250
This word comes from Latin roots,
00:00:23.250 --> 00:00:25.230
the co- part means with, or together,
00:00:25.230 --> 00:00:27.510
like cohabitate, to live together,
00:00:27.510 --> 00:00:30.060
or cooperate, to work together.
00:00:30.060 --> 00:00:33.150
You might also see it as con, or com.
00:00:33.150 --> 00:00:35.340
The -lect part comes from legere,
00:00:35.340 --> 00:00:38.580
which is Latin for "to
pick," or "to gather."
00:00:38.580 --> 00:00:42.030
It's also Latin for "to read,"
but that's another story.
00:00:42.030 --> 00:00:43.380
So gathered together,
00:00:43.380 --> 00:00:45.840
that's what it means to
collect something, right?
00:00:45.840 --> 00:00:47.820
Collect, gather together.
00:00:47.820 --> 00:00:50.400
And this last part, I-V-E, -ive,
00:00:50.400 --> 00:00:52.558
that's what makes it an
adjective, a describing word,
00:00:52.558 --> 00:00:55.260
it means tending to.
00:00:55.260 --> 00:00:57.660
So, therefore, something that's collective
00:00:57.660 --> 00:01:00.000
tends to stick together, right?
00:01:00.000 --> 00:01:04.170
Gathers things together,
does things as a group.
00:01:04.170 --> 00:01:05.850
So using these three elements,
00:01:05.850 --> 00:01:08.370
what other similar words
can you come up with?
00:01:08.370 --> 00:01:13.370
Co-, or con-, lect, or -ive.
00:01:13.830 --> 00:01:15.150
I'll put on some music.
00:01:15.150 --> 00:01:17.583
Meet me back here in 10 seconds.
00:01:18.607 --> 00:01:21.440
(energetic music)
00:01:29.220 --> 00:01:31.200
Okay. Here's what I came up with.
00:01:31.200 --> 00:01:34.290
Using CON, I have conduct, to guide,
00:01:34.290 --> 00:01:37.110
like a train conductor,
or an orchestra conductor.
00:01:37.110 --> 00:01:38.550
Con, together,
00:01:38.550 --> 00:01:39.930
duct, to lead.
00:01:39.930 --> 00:01:42.060
You're leading an orchestra together.
00:01:42.060 --> 00:01:45.270
You're keeping everyone
on the train together.
00:01:45.270 --> 00:01:48.390
Using LECT, I got elect, right?
00:01:48.390 --> 00:01:50.880
To vote for someone, to pick them.
00:01:50.880 --> 00:01:54.030
Using -ive, I got impressive,
00:01:54.030 --> 00:01:55.860
an adjective that describes something
00:01:55.860 --> 00:01:58.140
as worthy or memorable,
00:01:58.140 --> 00:02:01.350
something that might impress us, right?
00:02:01.350 --> 00:02:04.263
Let's use collective in a sentence.
00:02:05.947 --> 00:02:08.640
"Because its members loved arguing,
00:02:08.640 --> 00:02:12.300
the Debate Club struggled to
make collective decisions."
00:02:12.300 --> 00:02:14.730
Right? They couldn't even
decide what to order for dinner
00:02:14.730 --> 00:02:15.630
as a group.
00:02:15.630 --> 00:02:17.580
Little takeout menu in the center.
00:02:17.580 --> 00:02:19.620
You can also use collective as a noun,
00:02:19.620 --> 00:02:21.360
although that's a little bit less common,
00:02:21.360 --> 00:02:23.340
it's another way to say group.
00:02:23.340 --> 00:02:25.920
Think of like, a farmer's collective,
00:02:25.920 --> 00:02:28.980
or a yarn collective, right?
00:02:28.980 --> 00:02:30.570
It's a group of people
that have come together
00:02:30.570 --> 00:02:32.250
to accomplish something.
00:02:32.250 --> 00:02:33.990
Together, we fly, wordsmiths.
00:02:33.990 --> 00:02:36.540
What we do, we do collectively.
00:02:36.540 --> 00:02:37.860
And together,
00:02:37.860 --> 00:02:39.453
I think we can learn anything.
00:02:40.320 --> 00:02:41.153
David, out.
|
Incident | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qrp76qvtUhM | vtt | https://www.youtube.com/api/timedtext?v=Qrp76qvtUhM&ei=n1WUZcWgIMLDmLAPneut-Ao&caps=asr&opi=112496729&xoaf=5&hl=en&ip=0.0.0.0&ipbits=0&expire=1704245263&sparams=ip%2Cipbits%2Cexpire%2Cv%2Cei%2Ccaps%2Copi%2Cxoaf&signature=495862E502F9B504B5D5D4785E172627D2D72832.9CB760789943A86D17EF8ACF54B672380EB3BF5C&key=yt8&lang=en&name=Default&fmt=vtt | en | WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en
00:00:00.120 --> 00:00:01.080
- Hey, wordsmiths.
00:00:01.080 --> 00:00:04.170
Let me introduce you to
a spectacular new word.
00:00:04.170 --> 00:00:05.640
It's, oh.
00:00:05.640 --> 00:00:08.700
Oh dear. There's been an incident.
00:00:08.700 --> 00:00:10.710
This manatee has taken several bites
00:00:10.710 --> 00:00:12.990
out of the word spectacular. (sighs)
00:00:12.990 --> 00:00:14.850
Well, fine.
00:00:14.850 --> 00:00:16.980
We are nothing if not
flexible here at Khan Academy.
00:00:16.980 --> 00:00:20.580
So let us instead pivot to
the word incident itself.
00:00:20.580 --> 00:00:21.663
Incident.
00:00:22.560 --> 00:00:24.060
It's a noun.
00:00:24.060 --> 00:00:25.740
And it means an unforeseen
00:00:25.740 --> 00:00:27.600
and usually bad thing that happens,
00:00:27.600 --> 00:00:29.880
like a manatee taking several bites
00:00:29.880 --> 00:00:31.650
out of my vocabulary word.
00:00:31.650 --> 00:00:32.550
Thanks pal.
00:00:32.550 --> 00:00:34.170
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news,
00:00:34.170 --> 00:00:36.240
but hey, at least I can be the bearer
00:00:36.240 --> 00:00:38.043
of good word origins, huh?
00:00:38.043 --> 00:00:39.150
Huh? Come on.
00:00:39.150 --> 00:00:41.100
Incident comes from the Latin incidere,
00:00:41.100 --> 00:00:43.380
which means to fall upon or to happen.
00:00:43.380 --> 00:00:45.090
And we can break that into two parts,
00:00:45.090 --> 00:00:49.380
in, which means in or on, and
cidere, which means to fall.
00:00:49.380 --> 00:00:54.030
So an incident is an event
that fell upon you or happened.
00:00:54.030 --> 00:00:56.100
Now, normally this is the part
of the video where I ask you
00:00:56.100 --> 00:00:57.780
to come up with some
similar sounding words
00:00:57.780 --> 00:00:59.040
and we will get to that,
00:00:59.040 --> 00:01:01.290
but I wanted to head off some confusion.
00:01:01.290 --> 00:01:04.020
Cidere different from caedere,
00:01:04.020 --> 00:01:05.160
which means to kill,
00:01:05.160 --> 00:01:08.820
and shows up in words like
homicide or pesticide, right?
00:01:08.820 --> 00:01:10.170
To killing a person
00:01:10.170 --> 00:01:12.390
or killing pests or killing a bug.
00:01:12.390 --> 00:01:13.350
Different words.
00:01:13.350 --> 00:01:17.700
So when we look for words that
share a root with incident,
00:01:17.700 --> 00:01:19.860
they'll typically be pronounced cid
00:01:19.860 --> 00:01:21.510
instead of cide.
00:01:21.510 --> 00:01:23.040
Anyway, let's do the thing.
00:01:23.040 --> 00:01:24.990
You've got 10 seconds
to come up with words
00:01:24.990 --> 00:01:28.410
that use the prefix in, or the root cid.
00:01:28.410 --> 00:01:31.783
I'll put on some music.
(groovy music)
00:01:41.280 --> 00:01:43.173
Here are some words I came up with.
00:01:44.310 --> 00:01:48.330
Accident, a chance happening,
an unexpected mistake.
00:01:48.330 --> 00:01:49.560
Coincidence, right?
00:01:49.560 --> 00:01:51.510
Which is when two or more
things happen at once
00:01:51.510 --> 00:01:53.010
without having been planned,
00:01:53.010 --> 00:01:56.280
coincident, things happening together,
00:01:56.280 --> 00:01:57.690
and inspect,
00:01:57.690 --> 00:01:59.940
which is to look at something carefully.
00:01:59.940 --> 00:02:01.863
Looking in.
00:02:03.060 --> 00:02:05.070
Let's use incident in a sentence,
00:02:05.070 --> 00:02:08.673
because I think that'll get
across its bad news connotation.
00:02:09.540 --> 00:02:14.540
Sadly, the incident in the
library destroyed all the books.
00:02:14.640 --> 00:02:16.560
It was a bummer to lose all those books.
00:02:16.560 --> 00:02:18.600
An unfortunate thing happened.
00:02:18.600 --> 00:02:21.540
Incident can also
sometimes be a euphemism.
00:02:21.540 --> 00:02:23.640
A way of saying something ugly happened
00:02:23.640 --> 00:02:25.170
without having to name it.
00:02:25.170 --> 00:02:28.140
Note that I'm saying the
incident and not the fire,
00:02:28.140 --> 00:02:31.560
or the horrific cotton
candy machine malfunction.
00:02:31.560 --> 00:02:33.150
This would, as it happens,
00:02:33.150 --> 00:02:35.430
also be really bad for all the books.
00:02:35.430 --> 00:02:37.980
Ah, okay wordsmiths. I have to go.
00:02:37.980 --> 00:02:42.330
There's been an incident.
(thunder roaring)
00:02:42.330 --> 00:02:46.020
I think the manatee is
back and it's still hungry.
00:02:46.020 --> 00:02:47.640
I'll catch you all next time, huh?
00:02:47.640 --> 00:02:49.353
You can learn anything, David out.
|
Enforce | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htns7S4ILYE | vtt | https://www.youtube.com/api/timedtext?v=htns7S4ILYE&ei=n1WUZabIIvWsmLAPhYuekA4&caps=asr&opi=112496729&xoaf=5&hl=en&ip=0.0.0.0&ipbits=0&expire=1704245263&sparams=ip%2Cipbits%2Cexpire%2Cv%2Cei%2Ccaps%2Copi%2Cxoaf&signature=870486AD3D70918BBAD24B915E7E8186B0901E73.3E9C26D8A495BADD8CB6EA86BC8E879FB09CB73B&key=yt8&lang=en&name=Default&fmt=vtt | en | WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en
00:00:00.300 --> 00:00:02.100
- [Instructor] Hey, how
do you do wordsmiths?
00:00:02.100 --> 00:00:05.164
This video is about the word enforce.
00:00:05.164 --> 00:00:07.590
Enforce, it's a verb.
00:00:07.590 --> 00:00:11.820
It means to make sure that
a rule or law is followed.
00:00:11.820 --> 00:00:15.240
You might usually hear it in
the context of enforcing a law.
00:00:15.240 --> 00:00:16.560
Right? If I drive too fast,
00:00:16.560 --> 00:00:19.110
local authorities can
enforce the speed limit
00:00:19.110 --> 00:00:22.050
by issuing me a speeding ticket.
00:00:22.050 --> 00:00:24.990
Now, the word origin here
is kind of a violent one,
00:00:24.990 --> 00:00:27.270
this word comes from the
old French, enforcier,
00:00:27.270 --> 00:00:30.120
which means to use force
on someone or something.
00:00:30.120 --> 00:00:33.393
So, EN means in, or on.
00:00:34.230 --> 00:00:36.030
When it's EN, 99% of the time,
00:00:36.030 --> 00:00:37.890
that means it has a French origin,
00:00:37.890 --> 00:00:41.970
and sometimes it'll appear as EM too.
00:00:41.970 --> 00:00:44.490
Force means strength or power,
00:00:44.490 --> 00:00:46.590
it ultimately comes from
a Latin word, fortis,
00:00:46.590 --> 00:00:47.910
which just means strength.
00:00:47.910 --> 00:00:52.830
So when you enforce, you're
using your strength on someone.
00:00:52.830 --> 00:00:54.090
Let's take 10 seconds
00:00:54.090 --> 00:00:56.220
to come up with some more English words
00:00:56.220 --> 00:00:59.670
that contain N, or M, and force.
00:00:59.670 --> 00:01:01.140
I'll put on some music,
00:01:01.140 --> 00:01:03.540
and I'll meet you back here in 10 seconds.
00:01:03.540 --> 00:01:04.551
All right, let's do it.
00:01:04.551 --> 00:01:07.384
(energetic music)
00:01:15.750 --> 00:01:17.940
Right, here's three I came up with.
00:01:17.940 --> 00:01:21.150
Reinforce, which means to
strengthen something, right,
00:01:21.150 --> 00:01:23.193
to put more force in it.
00:01:24.150 --> 00:01:26.580
Encode, which means to
make information secret,
00:01:26.580 --> 00:01:28.800
or to give computerized instructions.
00:01:28.800 --> 00:01:31.320
A spy might carry an encoded letter,
00:01:31.320 --> 00:01:33.510
or I might convert a video file
00:01:33.510 --> 00:01:35.040
from one file type to another
00:01:35.040 --> 00:01:36.990
using an encoder program.
00:01:36.990 --> 00:01:40.530
Right? I'm putting it in, or into, code.
00:01:40.530 --> 00:01:44.400
And embolden, which means to
give someone confidence, right?
00:01:44.400 --> 00:01:47.640
Literally, to put boldness in them.
00:01:47.640 --> 00:01:49.170
And I know it's EM there,
00:01:49.170 --> 00:01:52.950
but M means the same thing as N.
00:01:52.950 --> 00:01:54.900
Let us use the force, as it were,
00:01:54.900 --> 00:01:56.527
and make some sentences.
00:01:56.527 --> 00:01:59.670
"The admiral enforced
the law on his enemies,
00:01:59.670 --> 00:02:02.250
but he ignored the law for his friends."
00:02:02.250 --> 00:02:03.180
So the admiral made sure
00:02:03.180 --> 00:02:05.730
that his enemies had to follow
the law, but not his friends.
00:02:05.730 --> 00:02:08.100
There he is signing a little decree.
00:02:08.100 --> 00:02:11.100
The noun form of enforce is enforcement,
00:02:11.100 --> 00:02:14.377
which you're most likely to
read or hear in the phrase
00:02:14.377 --> 00:02:15.420
"law enforcement,"
00:02:15.420 --> 00:02:17.970
which is to say the police,
sheriff's department,
00:02:17.970 --> 00:02:19.770
Department of Justice, right?
00:02:19.770 --> 00:02:23.940
Law enforcement is empowered
to enforce the law.
00:02:23.940 --> 00:02:26.407
They represent the power of
the state to say things like,
00:02:26.407 --> 00:02:28.680
"Hey, it's against the
law to hurt people."
00:02:28.680 --> 00:02:30.180
And if someone hurts people,
00:02:30.180 --> 00:02:33.030
the law has the power to stop them, right?
00:02:33.030 --> 00:02:36.330
That's what it means to
have enforcement powers.
00:02:36.330 --> 00:02:38.283
Okay, you can learn anything.
00:02:39.510 --> 00:02:40.343
David, out.
|
Impose | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZc71QSgd2Y | vtt | https://www.youtube.com/api/timedtext?v=yZc71QSgd2Y&ei=n1WUZZvPHcOdp-oP4YO3aA&caps=asr&opi=112496729&xoaf=5&hl=en&ip=0.0.0.0&ipbits=0&expire=1704245263&sparams=ip%2Cipbits%2Cexpire%2Cv%2Cei%2Ccaps%2Copi%2Cxoaf&signature=2F106C92DFE932B7D833A145E648B20FDB222569.8377B0441AA7BE83B0A477399E664F39D9326EAC&key=yt8&lang=en&name=Default&fmt=vtt | en | WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en
00:00:00.570 --> 00:00:01.860
- [Narrator] Hey there, wordsmiths.
00:00:01.860 --> 00:00:06.000
This video is about the
word impose, impose.
00:00:06.000 --> 00:00:09.930
It's a verb and it means to
force something onto others.
00:00:09.930 --> 00:00:12.900
Kind of like how I
impose my taste in music
00:00:12.900 --> 00:00:14.400
on you in these videos.
00:00:14.400 --> 00:00:17.130
You didn't ask for this,
I just put it onto you,
00:00:17.130 --> 00:00:21.420
which is indeed what this
word literally means in Latin/
00:00:21.420 --> 00:00:25.830
Comes from two parts, im or
in, which can mean in or on,
00:00:25.830 --> 00:00:28.020
and ponere, which means to put.
00:00:28.020 --> 00:00:30.120
So let me impose my taste on you
00:00:30.120 --> 00:00:32.220
by giving you a ten second music break
00:00:32.220 --> 00:00:34.350
during which time I would
like for you to list out
00:00:34.350 --> 00:00:38.400
as many words that contain
im or pose as you can.
00:00:38.400 --> 00:00:39.993
Ready? Let's do it to it.
00:00:41.078 --> 00:00:43.661
(upbeat music)
00:00:50.500 --> 00:00:53.160
All right, here is some
I came up with earlier.
00:00:53.160 --> 00:00:55.230
Position, where you put something,
00:00:55.230 --> 00:00:56.910
where it's located.
00:00:56.910 --> 00:00:59.460
Impression, an impact, a dent,
00:00:59.460 --> 00:01:01.020
when you make a big impression,
00:01:01.020 --> 00:01:03.030
you're literally saying you pressed
00:01:03.030 --> 00:01:05.580
into something, like a
big impression in the sand
00:01:05.580 --> 00:01:06.960
or the snow.
00:01:06.960 --> 00:01:10.410
Figuratively, it's an idea
that occurs to you as easily
00:01:10.410 --> 00:01:12.183
as making a dent in sand.
00:01:13.020 --> 00:01:14.520
Oppose, right?
00:01:14.520 --> 00:01:17.400
This word means to be against something,
00:01:17.400 --> 00:01:20.490
to put yourself against it.
00:01:20.490 --> 00:01:22.320
Anyway, impose, it means
00:01:22.320 --> 00:01:25.230
to put something on someone,
but it's not used literally.
00:01:25.230 --> 00:01:28.980
You wouldn't say, "I imposed
a bucket on Steve's head.
00:01:28.980 --> 00:01:30.150
Sorry Steve."
00:01:30.150 --> 00:01:31.177
'Cause you wouldn't do that.
00:01:31.177 --> 00:01:33.840
"So I guess I'm not sorry Steve,
'cause that didn't happen."
00:01:33.840 --> 00:01:37.380
It is a figurative meaning,
a non-literal meaning.
00:01:37.380 --> 00:01:39.810
Do you think the new principle will impose
00:01:39.810 --> 00:01:41.430
a ban on junk food?
00:01:41.430 --> 00:01:44.040
It's more like you're
putting in a new rule.
00:01:44.040 --> 00:01:46.950
Another meaning of
imposing is being impolite.
00:01:46.950 --> 00:01:49.560
It's a common expression
to say, "I don't want
00:01:49.560 --> 00:01:51.300
to impose," right?
00:01:51.300 --> 00:01:53.190
I don't wanna be an inconvenience.
00:01:53.190 --> 00:01:57.240
I don't wanna waste your
time, put myself in your way.
00:01:57.240 --> 00:02:01.290
You see, "I don't want to
impose, but could you look
00:02:01.290 --> 00:02:03.333
after my giant spider this weekend?
00:02:04.320 --> 00:02:08.100
You don't even need to walk
her, come on, she's so sweet.
00:02:08.100 --> 00:02:09.810
Her name is Benjamin."
00:02:09.810 --> 00:02:12.300
Another form that this word
can take if we wanna make it
00:02:12.300 --> 00:02:14.673
a noun, is imposition.
00:02:15.510 --> 00:02:17.460
It's a big imposition for me to look
00:02:17.460 --> 00:02:19.740
after this man eating spider.
00:02:19.740 --> 00:02:21.780
Wordsmiths, I would never ask you to watch
00:02:21.780 --> 00:02:24.450
my giant spider, man-eating or otherwise,
00:02:24.450 --> 00:02:27.210
but I would impose on
you by asking that you be
00:02:27.210 --> 00:02:30.453
so kind as to watch the next
vocabulary video I make.
00:02:31.290 --> 00:02:33.813
You can learn anything, David out.
|
Resistance | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-K5y3QrSqM | vtt | https://www.youtube.com/api/timedtext?v=H-K5y3QrSqM&ei=n1WUZfTAH525p-oPwa-NwAw&caps=asr&opi=112496729&xoaf=5&hl=en&ip=0.0.0.0&ipbits=0&expire=1704245263&sparams=ip%2Cipbits%2Cexpire%2Cv%2Cei%2Ccaps%2Copi%2Cxoaf&signature=580583DF845FFA2E18DA8D00DD70AA3087B6F68E.74774242813DFA986052E506302217A61DC23D5B&key=yt8&lang=en&name=Default&fmt=vtt | en | WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en
00:00:00.180 --> 00:00:01.470
- [Instructor] What's up, wordsmiths?
00:00:01.470 --> 00:00:04.040
This video is about the word resistance.
00:00:04.906 --> 00:00:05.823
Resistance.
00:00:07.800 --> 00:00:08.643
It's a noun.
00:00:09.510 --> 00:00:11.370
It means opposition,
00:00:11.370 --> 00:00:15.213
an effort to stop or fight
something or someone.
00:00:16.080 --> 00:00:18.210
We could say the developers wanted to turn
00:00:18.210 --> 00:00:19.950
the community garden into a parking lot,
00:00:19.950 --> 00:00:21.960
but they were stopped by stiff resistance
00:00:21.960 --> 00:00:22.890
from the neighborhood.
00:00:22.890 --> 00:00:23.970
No, don't.
00:00:23.970 --> 00:00:25.710
Yay for gardens, right?
00:00:25.710 --> 00:00:27.990
The community tried hard
to stop the developers.
00:00:27.990 --> 00:00:29.883
They resisted the plan.
00:00:30.780 --> 00:00:31.980
Derivation time.
00:00:31.980 --> 00:00:35.460
This word ultimately comes
from Latin word parts,
00:00:35.460 --> 00:00:40.230
so re meaning back again or against,
00:00:40.230 --> 00:00:43.563
and sistere, meaning to
stand firm, to stay put.
00:00:44.460 --> 00:00:45.840
So to resist something,
00:00:45.840 --> 00:00:47.580
to express your resistance
00:00:47.580 --> 00:00:52.380
is to stand firm against it
consistently again and again.
00:00:52.380 --> 00:00:55.440
Take the next 10 seconds to
think of some English words
00:00:55.440 --> 00:01:00.440
that contain either of those
elements, either re or sist.
00:01:00.570 --> 00:01:03.120
Ready? Let's go.
00:01:03.120 --> 00:01:05.787
(upbeat music)
00:01:13.290 --> 00:01:15.210
Here are some that I thought of.
00:01:15.210 --> 00:01:17.220
Persist, which means to continue
00:01:17.220 --> 00:01:19.140
through a difficult situation.
00:01:19.140 --> 00:01:21.120
Per means through, right?
00:01:21.120 --> 00:01:25.290
You stick with it. You stay
put through difficulty.
00:01:25.290 --> 00:01:27.840
Renew, which is to start something again,
00:01:27.840 --> 00:01:29.400
or make something new again,
00:01:29.400 --> 00:01:32.220
like renewing a checkout from the library,
00:01:32.220 --> 00:01:35.640
or insist, which is to
make a forceful demand,
00:01:35.640 --> 00:01:38.340
to stand firm about something, right?
00:01:38.340 --> 00:01:41.730
I insist on my right to a glazed donut.
00:01:41.730 --> 00:01:44.670
Let's use resistance in
a couple of sentences.
00:01:44.670 --> 00:01:48.060
Professor Insidious could
not poison Ms. Excellent,
00:01:48.060 --> 00:01:51.900
because of her legendary
resistance to toxins.
00:01:51.900 --> 00:01:54.630
That's a superhero I just made up.
00:01:54.630 --> 00:01:56.580
That's her thing. She can't be poisoned.
00:01:56.580 --> 00:01:59.160
She's highly resistant to poisons.
00:01:59.160 --> 00:02:00.480
Ooh, that's a good one.
00:02:00.480 --> 00:02:03.180
Let's use the adjective form, resistant.
00:02:03.180 --> 00:02:06.450
Put on an A-N-T ending there.
00:02:06.450 --> 00:02:08.730
When they offered to fly
me across the country,
00:02:08.730 --> 00:02:11.070
I was resistant at first.
00:02:11.070 --> 00:02:13.440
That's our adjective
form. I was resistant.
00:02:13.440 --> 00:02:16.170
I didn't wanna do it. I opposed it.
00:02:16.170 --> 00:02:18.690
I exhibited resistance.
00:02:18.690 --> 00:02:20.490
I hope that you do not exhibit resistance
00:02:20.490 --> 00:02:21.990
to learning, dear Wordsmiths,
00:02:21.990 --> 00:02:25.471
because I remain confident
that you can learn anything.
00:02:25.471 --> 00:02:26.963
David Allen.
|
Contentious | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FqkqTp2IC3I | vtt | https://www.youtube.com/api/timedtext?v=FqkqTp2IC3I&ei=n1WUZfu8G_7XxN8PyKCVsAk&caps=asr&opi=112496729&xoaf=5&hl=en&ip=0.0.0.0&ipbits=0&expire=1704245263&sparams=ip%2Cipbits%2Cexpire%2Cv%2Cei%2Ccaps%2Copi%2Cxoaf&signature=DCC556598A9F92FC1DC0735514F5A3672DD7589D.1CFB930C55366C131F13153E96372FC5934C788B&key=yt8&lang=en&name=Default&fmt=vtt | en | WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en
00:00:00.450 --> 00:00:02.430
- I've got a bone to pick
with you, wordsmiths,
00:00:02.430 --> 00:00:05.436
because this video is
about the word contentious.
00:00:05.436 --> 00:00:06.436
Contentious.
00:00:07.470 --> 00:00:08.690
It's an adjective
00:00:08.690 --> 00:00:11.460
and it means involving arguing.
00:00:11.460 --> 00:00:15.540
Quarrelsome, we had a contentious
debate over whether bears
00:00:15.540 --> 00:00:17.910
were scarier than snakes.
00:00:17.910 --> 00:00:21.930
Kind of looks like a pig,
but pigs can also be scary.
00:00:21.930 --> 00:00:22.763
I don't know.
00:00:22.763 --> 00:00:25.200
This word comes to us
from Latin, contentious,
00:00:25.200 --> 00:00:27.870
and it's a combination of two parts.
00:00:27.870 --> 00:00:30.000
Con, which means together or with
00:00:30.000 --> 00:00:33.750
and tendere which means
to stretch, to contend
00:00:33.750 --> 00:00:35.820
for something in English
is to fight for it
00:00:35.820 --> 00:00:39.000
with someone else, you're
stretching your relationship
00:00:39.000 --> 00:00:40.800
with someone like a tug of war
00:00:40.800 --> 00:00:42.930
where you're both pulling
on the end of a rope.
00:00:42.930 --> 00:00:45.424
So something that's
contentious is, for lack
00:00:45.424 --> 00:00:49.050
of a better word, fighty, argumentative.
00:00:49.050 --> 00:00:52.860
Keeping those elements
con and tend in mind.
00:00:52.860 --> 00:00:55.770
Try to come up with a couple
of similar words in English
00:00:55.770 --> 00:00:57.690
that contain those parts.
00:00:57.690 --> 00:00:59.340
I'll give you 10 seconds.
00:00:59.340 --> 00:01:00.600
All right?
00:01:00.600 --> 00:01:02.938
Take me home country road.
00:01:02.938 --> 00:01:05.605
(upbeat music)
00:01:13.230 --> 00:01:14.880
Here were some of mine.
00:01:14.880 --> 00:01:15.713
Tension,
00:01:15.713 --> 00:01:18.060
which is when something
is stretched tight,
00:01:18.060 --> 00:01:20.940
like a rubber band or a spring,
or it can also be a kind
00:01:20.940 --> 00:01:24.330
of unspoken conflict between people.
00:01:24.330 --> 00:01:28.320
Container, a box, an
enclosure of some kind.
00:01:28.320 --> 00:01:32.190
Con tainer means held together
00:01:32.190 --> 00:01:35.670
and extend, which means to stretch out,
00:01:35.670 --> 00:01:38.430
to extend the hand of friendship.
00:01:38.430 --> 00:01:39.869
Let's try it in a sentence.
00:01:39.869 --> 00:01:42.510
Over a series of contentious meetings,
00:01:42.510 --> 00:01:46.620
team cake finally agreed to
a compromise with team pie.
00:01:46.620 --> 00:01:48.900
It must have been a bitter conflict.
00:01:48.900 --> 00:01:51.480
Well, I guess a sweet conflict actually.
00:01:51.480 --> 00:01:54.030
Another one, when we play Monopoly,
00:01:54.030 --> 00:01:56.760
it's always a contentious
issue as to who gets
00:01:56.760 --> 00:01:58.230
to be the thimble.
00:01:58.230 --> 00:02:00.270
That's a weird thing to
argue over, in my opinion.
00:02:00.270 --> 00:02:01.103
I love a thimble.
00:02:01.103 --> 00:02:02.550
Sure, but the Scotty dog
00:02:02.550 --> 00:02:05.190
and the top hat are right there.
00:02:05.190 --> 00:02:06.480
Do not pass go.
00:02:06.480 --> 00:02:08.670
Do not collect 200 vocabulary words.
00:02:08.670 --> 00:02:10.530
We gotta hash this argument out first.
00:02:10.530 --> 00:02:14.760
You contentious, wordsmiths
you, you can learn anything.
00:02:14.760 --> 00:02:15.593
David out.
|
Rebellion | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KSfHSvFc5vs | vtt | https://www.youtube.com/api/timedtext?v=KSfHSvFc5vs&ei=n1WUZeC8H-PDmLAP4vOH6Ao&caps=asr&opi=112496729&xoaf=5&hl=en&ip=0.0.0.0&ipbits=0&expire=1704245263&sparams=ip%2Cipbits%2Cexpire%2Cv%2Cei%2Ccaps%2Copi%2Cxoaf&signature=5EFA9A371EC12D7D8F0BC44B61D134C56C4E01A1.EC5DD572CCB328DA1B23A5D9D539BB48346F3F50&key=yt8&lang=en&name=Default&fmt=vtt | en | WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en
00:00:00.510 --> 00:00:03.000
- [Presenter] Sound the
drums of war, wordsmiths,
00:00:03.000 --> 00:00:06.570
because today I teach you about rebellion.
00:00:06.570 --> 00:00:08.163
Man, I'm a great influence.
00:00:09.060 --> 00:00:10.890
Rebellion.
00:00:10.890 --> 00:00:11.723
It's a noun.
00:00:11.723 --> 00:00:14.940
It means war or pushback
against a government
00:00:14.940 --> 00:00:16.440
or an authority, right?
00:00:16.440 --> 00:00:18.270
The American Revolutionary War
00:00:18.270 --> 00:00:21.090
began as a rebellion
against the British Crown.
00:00:21.090 --> 00:00:23.310
Now, this word has Latin origins.
00:00:23.310 --> 00:00:27.210
The root bel comes from the
Latin bellum, meaning war,
00:00:27.210 --> 00:00:30.960
and the prefix re means
again, against, or back.
00:00:30.960 --> 00:00:32.310
So rebels stand up
00:00:32.310 --> 00:00:35.340
and maybe go to war
against something, right?
00:00:35.340 --> 00:00:36.810
They're seeking change.
00:00:36.810 --> 00:00:39.180
So two countries going
to war with each other
00:00:39.180 --> 00:00:40.230
is not a rebellion,
00:00:40.230 --> 00:00:42.450
but in uprising within a country,
00:00:42.450 --> 00:00:46.020
protesting a tyrannical
ruler, that's a rebellion.
00:00:46.020 --> 00:00:47.760
So re and bel,
00:00:47.760 --> 00:00:50.610
those are our word parts
I wanna focus on today.
00:00:50.610 --> 00:00:53.070
I'm gonna put on some
music for about 10 seconds,
00:00:53.070 --> 00:00:56.370
and while I do that, come up
with as many words as you can
00:00:56.370 --> 00:00:59.280
that contain those elements.
00:00:59.280 --> 00:01:01.297
Okay Let's go.
00:01:01.297 --> 00:01:03.880
(upbeat music)
00:01:12.840 --> 00:01:16.230
Okay, here are three that
I came up with. Remake.
00:01:16.230 --> 00:01:17.520
Like there's an old movie
00:01:17.520 --> 00:01:19.560
and you're making a new
version of it, right?
00:01:19.560 --> 00:01:22.410
You're making it again. Remake.
00:01:22.410 --> 00:01:23.280
Belligerent.
00:01:23.280 --> 00:01:27.600
One of my favorite adjectives.
It means hostile or warlike.
00:01:27.600 --> 00:01:30.240
A belligerent person
starts a lot of arguments,
00:01:30.240 --> 00:01:31.620
a lot of fights.
00:01:31.620 --> 00:01:33.270
And this last one, rebel, right?
00:01:33.270 --> 00:01:34.830
Also contained within rebellion.
00:01:34.830 --> 00:01:37.200
This word can be a noun or a verb.
00:01:37.200 --> 00:01:38.310
I wanted to flag it
00:01:38.310 --> 00:01:40.290
because pronunciations are different
00:01:40.290 --> 00:01:41.880
depending on how you use it.
00:01:41.880 --> 00:01:43.650
When it's a person, they're a rebel.
00:01:43.650 --> 00:01:47.910
But the thing that a rebel
does is rebel, fights back.
00:01:47.910 --> 00:01:51.483
The emphasis changes from the
first syllable to the second.
00:01:53.010 --> 00:01:55.200
First syllable. Second syllable.
00:01:55.200 --> 00:01:56.760
The nouns verbed.
00:01:56.760 --> 00:02:00.330
The rebels rebelled in their rebellion.
00:02:00.330 --> 00:02:02.490
Let's use rebellion in a sentence or two.
00:02:02.490 --> 00:02:04.080
To the mind of a dictator,
00:02:04.080 --> 00:02:06.840
something as innocent as
a sidewalk chalk drawing
00:02:06.840 --> 00:02:09.450
could be seen as an act of rebellion.
00:02:09.450 --> 00:02:12.030
So it's seen as an act of war
00:02:12.030 --> 00:02:14.790
or of open resistance to the dictator.
00:02:14.790 --> 00:02:15.780
Look at a mouth open.
00:02:15.780 --> 00:02:17.970
He looks so scandalized by little house.
00:02:17.970 --> 00:02:21.780
Marta rebelled quietly. She
pulled doors marked push.
00:02:21.780 --> 00:02:23.730
She rode her bike through
the drive-through.
00:02:23.730 --> 00:02:26.010
She microwaved fish in the office.
00:02:26.010 --> 00:02:27.030
I feel like I'm contributing
00:02:27.030 --> 00:02:30.510
to kind of an anti-fish narrative
here, and that's unfair.
00:02:30.510 --> 00:02:33.840
I microwave fish in the Khan
Academy lunchroom, whatever.
00:02:33.840 --> 00:02:35.580
I'm not too proud to admit it.
00:02:35.580 --> 00:02:37.350
Does that make me a hero?
00:02:37.350 --> 00:02:38.820
Maybe.
00:02:38.820 --> 00:02:41.403
Does it make me a rebel? Oh, you betcha.
00:02:42.480 --> 00:02:45.030
Now, if you excuse me,
your boy's got a serving
00:02:45.030 --> 00:02:46.710
of tuna casserole in the refrigerator,
00:02:46.710 --> 00:02:49.861
and I can't eat it cold,
if you know what I mean.
00:02:49.861 --> 00:02:53.257
So you can learn anything. Dig it out.
00:02:54.892 --> 00:02:58.464
(microwave door opens)
00:02:58.464 --> 00:03:00.916
(microwave beeps)
00:03:00.916 --> 00:03:04.780
(microwave door opens)
(presenter laughs)
|
Eliminate | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O3mwVQbV9GQ | vtt | https://www.youtube.com/api/timedtext?v=O3mwVQbV9GQ&ei=n1WUZY64IO_dmLAPmNOc0AE&caps=asr&opi=112496729&xoaf=5&hl=en&ip=0.0.0.0&ipbits=0&expire=1704245263&sparams=ip%2Cipbits%2Cexpire%2Cv%2Cei%2Ccaps%2Copi%2Cxoaf&signature=38FA24E32EE29926C6ECE2DB413B14516F241954.8EAE4C85C3D0AF2AB67A3D82356D8EB8374130F9&key=yt8&lang=en&name=Default&fmt=vtt | en | WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en
00:00:00.210 --> 00:00:01.650
- [David] What's up, wordsmiths?
00:00:01.650 --> 00:00:04.971
This video is about the word eliminate.
00:00:04.971 --> 00:00:06.963
Eliminate.
00:00:07.800 --> 00:00:08.633
It's a verb.
00:00:08.633 --> 00:00:11.313
It means to remove or
get rid of something.
00:00:12.150 --> 00:00:14.580
The word comes to us from Latin,
00:00:14.580 --> 00:00:17.550
and it's a combination of two parts, ex,
00:00:17.550 --> 00:00:20.550
which means out or away, think exit,
00:00:20.550 --> 00:00:25.550
and limin, which means edge
or threshold, think limit.
00:00:25.800 --> 00:00:27.960
You're pushing something
over the threshold
00:00:27.960 --> 00:00:29.159
and out the door.
00:00:29.159 --> 00:00:29.992
(instructor mimicking door slamming)
00:00:29.992 --> 00:00:30.825
There he goes.
00:00:30.825 --> 00:00:32.493
You'll notice it's not exliminate.
00:00:33.390 --> 00:00:36.813
Sometimes ex gets
shortened down to just e,
00:00:37.860 --> 00:00:41.400
as it does here or in
words like eject or emit.
00:00:41.400 --> 00:00:45.270
For now, just know that
sometimes, ex becomes e,
00:00:45.270 --> 00:00:46.770
as in eliminate.
00:00:46.770 --> 00:00:48.420
Thinking of those elements,
00:00:48.420 --> 00:00:52.650
ex or lim, try to come up
with a couple of similar words
00:00:52.650 --> 00:00:54.750
in English that contain those parts.
00:00:54.750 --> 00:00:57.180
I'll give you 10 seconds, all right?
00:00:57.180 --> 00:00:59.152
Take it away, music break.
00:00:59.152 --> 00:01:01.652
(light music)
00:01:10.050 --> 00:01:11.253
Here are some of mine:
00:01:12.150 --> 00:01:14.460
exit, like the opposite of an entrance,
00:01:14.460 --> 00:01:16.260
a place you go out of,
00:01:16.260 --> 00:01:19.710
limit, like the edge or
the end of something,
00:01:19.710 --> 00:01:21.810
and subliminal, this is a fun one.
00:01:21.810 --> 00:01:24.870
It means below the threshold of awareness.
00:01:24.870 --> 00:01:27.450
You might have heard of
subliminal messaging,
00:01:27.450 --> 00:01:29.700
like how I've been
subtly flashing the words
00:01:29.700 --> 00:01:33.420
eat more mangoes onscreen
for the last five seconds.
00:01:33.420 --> 00:01:36.270
I haven't been paid by any
mango growers or anything.
00:01:36.270 --> 00:01:37.950
I just think they're tasty fruits.
00:01:37.950 --> 00:01:41.550
But to eliminate something
is to get rid of it.
00:01:41.550 --> 00:01:42.393
For good.
00:01:43.260 --> 00:01:44.820
Let's try it in a sentence.
00:01:44.820 --> 00:01:47.340
And you can see how it comes across.
00:01:47.340 --> 00:01:51.997
It usually has a kind of dire
connotation, kinda scary.
00:01:51.997 --> 00:01:55.020
"Our new directive of
public order will eliminate
00:01:55.020 --> 00:01:57.150
those troublemakers for good,"
00:01:57.150 --> 00:02:00.060
sneered the Minister of Peace.
00:02:00.060 --> 00:02:01.350
Right, creepy, ew.
00:02:01.350 --> 00:02:03.330
I didn't even need to do the voice.
00:02:03.330 --> 00:02:05.580
Getting rid of troublemakers for good
00:02:05.580 --> 00:02:07.560
sounds pretty frightening.
00:02:07.560 --> 00:02:08.763
Not gonna lie.
00:02:09.900 --> 00:02:11.790
A less creepy example, you might see it
00:02:11.790 --> 00:02:14.347
in an advertising context, like,
00:02:14.347 --> 00:02:18.780
"This fabulous product eliminates
99% of household odors!"
00:02:18.780 --> 00:02:21.210
Fabulous little product in its spray can.
00:02:21.210 --> 00:02:23.490
It removes the odors.
00:02:23.490 --> 00:02:24.330
It takes them away.
00:02:24.330 --> 00:02:26.280
It puts them beyond the threshold,
00:02:26.280 --> 00:02:28.230
the limit of your awareness.
00:02:28.230 --> 00:02:31.860
I hope that this video has
eliminated any confusion
00:02:31.860 --> 00:02:34.710
about the meaning of the word eliminate.
00:02:34.710 --> 00:02:37.050
All right, I'm exiting now.
00:02:37.050 --> 00:02:39.270
Catch you in the next one.
00:02:39.270 --> 00:02:41.403
You can learn anything, David out.
|
Defiant | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vq64MQBtIGc | vtt | https://www.youtube.com/api/timedtext?v=Vq64MQBtIGc&ei=n1WUZffsGYn6vdIP67GowAE&caps=asr&opi=112496729&xoaf=5&hl=en&ip=0.0.0.0&ipbits=0&expire=1704245263&sparams=ip%2Cipbits%2Cexpire%2Cv%2Cei%2Ccaps%2Copi%2Cxoaf&signature=091E478934CD99B58E355E95722D28120330E423.CC00BE7B6934B4848B184D68FC2CE20355412C77&key=yt8&lang=en&name=Default&fmt=vtt | en | WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en
00:00:01.140 --> 00:00:02.730
- [David] To arms, wordsmiths!
00:00:02.730 --> 00:00:05.970
This video is about the word defiant.
00:00:05.970 --> 00:00:07.893
De-fi-ant.
00:00:08.820 --> 00:00:10.170
It's an adjective.
00:00:10.170 --> 00:00:13.050
This word means openly disobeying rules,
00:00:13.050 --> 00:00:15.570
pushing back against authority.
00:00:15.570 --> 00:00:18.480
This word comes to us from
French and ultimately Latin,
00:00:18.480 --> 00:00:22.470
a late Latin verb, disfidare, which means
00:00:22.470 --> 00:00:25.200
to renounce, to go back on one's faith.
00:00:25.200 --> 00:00:30.120
Fidus is Latin for faith or
trust and dis means not or away.
00:00:30.120 --> 00:00:32.430
So with that in mind, what
are some English words
00:00:32.430 --> 00:00:35.280
that you can think of that
contain those elements?
00:00:35.280 --> 00:00:37.170
Dis or fid?
00:00:37.170 --> 00:00:39.180
You're probably wondering
about dis and de,
00:00:39.180 --> 00:00:40.650
those are different sounds.
00:00:40.650 --> 00:00:42.390
They mean the exact same thing in Latin,
00:00:42.390 --> 00:00:44.430
they both mean not or away.
00:00:44.430 --> 00:00:45.960
I'll give you 10 seconds to think,
00:00:45.960 --> 00:00:48.240
and then show you what I came up with.
00:00:48.240 --> 00:00:49.201
Here we go.
00:00:49.201 --> 00:00:54.201
(instructor snaps fingers)
(futuristic upbeat music)
00:01:02.700 --> 00:01:03.930
Here's some of mine.
00:01:03.930 --> 00:01:05.130
Dislike, right?
00:01:05.130 --> 00:01:06.960
Not liking something.
00:01:06.960 --> 00:01:10.470
Fidelity, which is like
faithfulness or loyalty,
00:01:10.470 --> 00:01:13.950
and confidence, which is like
saying you trust yourself.
00:01:13.950 --> 00:01:15.600
You have faith in yourself.
00:01:15.600 --> 00:01:17.130
Let's use it in a sentence or two.
00:01:17.130 --> 00:01:19.740
In fact, let me show you a
couple of forms of this word
00:01:19.740 --> 00:01:23.430
'cause you can use it as
a verb, as defy or defies
00:01:23.430 --> 00:01:28.200
as in Luella defied her
father and snuck out at night.
00:01:28.200 --> 00:01:30.000
And then when we turn it
back into an adjective
00:01:30.000 --> 00:01:33.216
by adding that A-N-T ending,
we get defiant again.
00:01:33.216 --> 00:01:35.190
Plumeria Goodheart was defiant.
00:01:35.190 --> 00:01:37.830
She would never give
in to Lady Mordigaunt.
00:01:37.830 --> 00:01:40.080
Little hobbit-y woman over
her, brimming with goodness,
00:01:40.080 --> 00:01:42.967
big evil sorceress over here,
crackling with lightning.
00:01:42.967 --> 00:01:43.837
"Feel my wrath!"
00:01:43.837 --> 00:01:45.780
"I'll never join you,"
et cetera, et cetera.
00:01:45.780 --> 00:01:46.680
You get the picture.
00:01:46.680 --> 00:01:51.540
To be defiant is to be bold,
audacious, rebellious, unruly.
00:01:51.540 --> 00:01:56.540
A defiant person openly flouts
rules and fights authority.
00:01:56.880 --> 00:02:01.290
So when you wanna turn that
adjective defiant into a noun,
00:02:01.290 --> 00:02:04.230
you turn the A-N-T into A-N-C-E.
00:02:04.230 --> 00:02:06.810
Defiant becomes defiance.
00:02:06.810 --> 00:02:09.390
That's how you talk about it as a noun.
00:02:09.390 --> 00:02:10.890
Let me use it in a sentence.
00:02:10.890 --> 00:02:14.280
The rebels showed their
defiance through performances
00:02:14.280 --> 00:02:16.260
of forbidden dance.
00:02:16.260 --> 00:02:18.240
The most forbidden dance
of all is the dance
00:02:18.240 --> 00:02:20.250
of neurons blazing through your mind
00:02:20.250 --> 00:02:21.510
as they make new connections.
00:02:21.510 --> 00:02:23.640
Sparks flying in the deepness of your mind
00:02:23.640 --> 00:02:25.890
as your brain becomes a
bright shimmering beacon
00:02:25.890 --> 00:02:26.940
of knowledge.
00:02:26.940 --> 00:02:30.390
The rumba of rumination,
the bachata of brilliance,
00:02:30.390 --> 00:02:33.570
the lambada of learning.
00:02:33.570 --> 00:02:36.813
You can learn anything, David out.
|
Invalid | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XWYe2AVlyg0 | vtt | https://www.youtube.com/api/timedtext?v=XWYe2AVlyg0&ei=n1WUZdW2I9LgxN8PqeqkiA0&caps=asr&opi=112496729&xoaf=5&hl=en&ip=0.0.0.0&ipbits=0&expire=1704245263&sparams=ip%2Cipbits%2Cexpire%2Cv%2Cei%2Ccaps%2Copi%2Cxoaf&signature=5E228FB3D59AA12E982028E875D7234AC52429B2.6440D8C0209B29D98C74AAF1FE58901E2BF14834&key=yt8&lang=en&name=Default&fmt=vtt | en | WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en
00:00:00.930 --> 00:00:02.550
- [David] Hello, Wordsmiths.
00:00:02.550 --> 00:00:05.670
The word we're featuring
in this video is invalid.
00:00:05.670 --> 00:00:07.230
That's right, it's not true.
00:00:07.230 --> 00:00:10.950
Or rather, that's what it means, invalid.
00:00:10.950 --> 00:00:14.550
Incorrect, false, not accepted.
00:00:14.550 --> 00:00:16.290
It's an adjective.
00:00:16.290 --> 00:00:20.280
It comes from Latin where
the prefix in means not,
00:00:20.280 --> 00:00:23.250
and the word validus means strong.
00:00:23.250 --> 00:00:26.520
So it literally means not strong or weak.
00:00:26.520 --> 00:00:28.920
A weak argument, a weak law,
00:00:28.920 --> 00:00:30.960
someone's argument might be invalid
00:00:30.960 --> 00:00:34.050
because it was based on faulty evidence.
00:00:34.050 --> 00:00:35.730
When you look at invalid,
00:00:35.730 --> 00:00:38.430
can you recognize any other English words,
00:00:38.430 --> 00:00:41.133
anything with in or vow in it?
00:00:42.210 --> 00:00:45.120
Take 10 seconds of this
music break to come up
00:00:45.120 --> 00:00:47.070
with some possibilities.
00:00:47.070 --> 00:00:48.037
Here we go.
00:00:48.037 --> 00:00:50.620
(upbeat music)
00:00:59.460 --> 00:01:03.120
Validate, right to prove that
something's right or true.
00:01:03.120 --> 00:01:05.070
I validate your parking.
00:01:05.070 --> 00:01:07.200
I validate your feelings.
00:01:07.200 --> 00:01:09.100
Get you with the big validation stamp.
00:01:10.110 --> 00:01:13.770
Value, meaning something
that has worth, right?
00:01:13.770 --> 00:01:15.840
Strength in worth.
00:01:15.840 --> 00:01:19.350
And inability, which is when
you cannot do something.
00:01:19.350 --> 00:01:21.480
There's ability, right,
when it can do a thing.
00:01:21.480 --> 00:01:25.410
And inability, which is its opposite.
00:01:25.410 --> 00:01:29.100
Let's spend some time
talking about that in prefix,
00:01:29.100 --> 00:01:31.830
honestly, because it can get confusing.
00:01:31.830 --> 00:01:34.590
There are two different
prefixes in English,
00:01:34.590 --> 00:01:36.720
both coming from Latin that are spelled
00:01:36.720 --> 00:01:38.460
and pronounced the same way.
00:01:38.460 --> 00:01:42.690
Both in, I-N, that have
different meanings.
00:01:42.690 --> 00:01:47.310
In, or sometimes I'm, I-M, means not.
00:01:47.310 --> 00:01:50.220
Exactly like the native English, un.
00:01:50.220 --> 00:01:52.953
Like unlikeable, unlovely.
00:01:53.970 --> 00:01:58.860
Think invalid, impolite,
infrequent, right.
00:01:58.860 --> 00:02:02.070
Not correct, not polite, not frequent.
00:02:02.070 --> 00:02:06.243
And then there's in,
I-N, that means inside.
00:02:07.200 --> 00:02:09.753
This also sometimes appears as E-N, en,
00:02:11.400 --> 00:02:13.620
like insight looking inward
00:02:13.620 --> 00:02:17.040
or insert, which is to put
something into something else.
00:02:17.040 --> 00:02:21.930
Or with the E-N, you can
have it as enlist or enrich.
00:02:21.930 --> 00:02:26.220
But today in this video,
we're talking about the in
00:02:26.220 --> 00:02:28.080
that means un.
00:02:28.080 --> 00:02:30.240
The in that means not.
00:02:30.240 --> 00:02:33.330
We'll return to this topic
for sure in other videos.
00:02:33.330 --> 00:02:36.720
Now let's use invalid in a sentence.
00:02:36.720 --> 00:02:37.920
I can't log in.
00:02:37.920 --> 00:02:41.070
It says my password is invalid.
00:02:41.070 --> 00:02:42.090
Makes you furious.
00:02:42.090 --> 00:02:44.640
When something's invalid, it doesn't work.
00:02:44.640 --> 00:02:45.473
It isn't correct.
00:02:45.473 --> 00:02:48.360
When it's valid, it's
proper and appropriate.
00:02:48.360 --> 00:02:51.510
But when it's invalid,
it won't be accepted.
00:02:51.510 --> 00:02:52.890
It's no good.
00:02:52.890 --> 00:02:54.510
You know what is good though?
00:02:54.510 --> 00:02:57.090
You, you're good.
00:02:57.090 --> 00:02:59.580
I believe in you and
the vocabulary journey
00:02:59.580 --> 00:03:01.440
that we are on together.
00:03:01.440 --> 00:03:03.993
You can learn anything, David, out.
|
Policy | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DKgf5xh3Vfg | vtt | https://www.youtube.com/api/timedtext?v=DKgf5xh3Vfg&ei=n1WUZYOrIMK7vdIPja-mkAQ&caps=asr&opi=112496729&xoaf=5&hl=en&ip=0.0.0.0&ipbits=0&expire=1704245263&sparams=ip%2Cipbits%2Cexpire%2Cv%2Cei%2Ccaps%2Copi%2Cxoaf&signature=85CE19471B124ADB90E45206EAB4F94EA9AA3F02.74CCF7A7765D6976FBAD2B00D7AE735418988048&key=yt8&lang=en&name=Default&fmt=vtt | en | WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en
00:00:01.080 --> 00:00:02.640
- [Instructor] Hello, wordsmiths.
00:00:02.640 --> 00:00:06.195
The word we're featuring
in this video is policy,
00:00:06.195 --> 00:00:10.489
which means an official
rule or set of rules.
00:00:10.489 --> 00:00:12.297
Policy.
00:00:12.297 --> 00:00:13.383
It's a noun.
00:00:14.400 --> 00:00:16.620
It comes from the Greek word polis,
00:00:16.620 --> 00:00:18.930
which means city.
00:00:18.930 --> 00:00:21.723
As a root, has to do with
cities and government.
00:00:22.650 --> 00:00:25.500
I live in Washington, DC so
when I think of this root,
00:00:25.500 --> 00:00:28.290
I think of the capitol building itself,
00:00:28.290 --> 00:00:30.600
a government building in
the middle of the city,
00:00:30.600 --> 00:00:34.490
where rules or policies are created.
00:00:34.490 --> 00:00:37.500
Can you think of words that
sound similar to policy
00:00:37.500 --> 00:00:39.543
that might have that same root, polis?
00:00:39.543 --> 00:00:43.230
Bear in mind that sometimes
we drop the S in polis
00:00:43.230 --> 00:00:44.580
when making new words.
00:00:44.580 --> 00:00:47.490
I'll give you 10 seconds to list some out.
00:00:47.490 --> 00:00:49.097
Cue the music wall.
00:00:49.097 --> 00:00:51.597
(light music)
00:01:00.248 --> 00:01:04.350
Here are three related words I thought of.
00:01:04.350 --> 00:01:07.950
Police, the people who enforce the law,
00:01:07.950 --> 00:01:11.400
politics, or how people
make decisions together
00:01:11.400 --> 00:01:16.400
in a society and metropolis, a huge city.
00:01:17.370 --> 00:01:19.920
So you can see how all of
those words are related
00:01:19.920 --> 00:01:22.230
to governments or cities.
00:01:22.230 --> 00:01:25.803
Let's use policy in a sentence
so you can get a sense of it.
00:01:26.670 --> 00:01:28.500
It's a state policy in Florida
00:01:28.500 --> 00:01:31.920
that if you encounter
a manatee in the wild,
00:01:31.920 --> 00:01:34.080
you have to give her $10.
00:01:34.080 --> 00:01:36.960
The connotation, the feeling of policy is
00:01:36.960 --> 00:01:38.370
that it's an official rule.
00:01:38.370 --> 00:01:39.810
So something that a business
00:01:39.810 --> 00:01:41.640
or a government might come up with.
00:01:41.640 --> 00:01:45.330
A restaurant might have a strict
policy against bringing in
00:01:45.330 --> 00:01:47.460
some other restaurant's food.
00:01:47.460 --> 00:01:51.270
Our policy: no outside food or drink.
00:01:51.270 --> 00:01:52.920
Oh no, this manatee went into a restaurant
00:01:52.920 --> 00:01:55.350
with food from another establishment.
00:01:55.350 --> 00:01:59.430
The D stands for Dugong, which
is another kind of sea cow.
00:01:59.430 --> 00:02:01.290
That's all the time
we've got for this one.
00:02:01.290 --> 00:02:03.390
Tip your server, support
your local manatee,
00:02:03.390 --> 00:02:05.730
and you can learn anything.
00:02:05.730 --> 00:02:06.563
David out.
|
Align | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7hRMwFVTrtc | vtt | https://www.youtube.com/api/timedtext?v=7hRMwFVTrtc&ei=n1WUZZSrHeGdp-oPrsGD6Ak&caps=asr&opi=112496729&xoaf=5&hl=en&ip=0.0.0.0&ipbits=0&expire=1704245263&sparams=ip%2Cipbits%2Cexpire%2Cv%2Cei%2Ccaps%2Copi%2Cxoaf&signature=20397BB09D5863734DEEFE03D452BA873FC18F6E.9D7ADAF29972E52419C10BA364BEF1AF242E3471&key=yt8&lang=en&name=Default&fmt=vtt | en | WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en
00:00:00.090 --> 00:00:01.260
- [David] Hey, there, Wordsmiths.
00:00:01.260 --> 00:00:04.187
This video is about the word align, align.
00:00:05.460 --> 00:00:06.900
This word has two definitions.
00:00:06.900 --> 00:00:11.900
The first is to support, ally
or associate with someone.
00:00:11.910 --> 00:00:13.140
And the second definition
00:00:13.140 --> 00:00:14.820
is to put things in a straight line.
00:00:14.820 --> 00:00:17.010
That's its literal definition.
00:00:17.010 --> 00:00:20.010
It comes from the Latin
lin, which means line.
00:00:20.010 --> 00:00:23.640
It's a very useful little
word and it is a verb.
00:00:23.640 --> 00:00:26.310
Now, I'm gonna throw y'all
a ten second music break
00:00:26.310 --> 00:00:27.510
and in that time,
00:00:27.510 --> 00:00:31.525
see how many words you can
come up with that use lin.
00:00:31.525 --> 00:00:34.191
Please, Mr. Music, won't you play?
00:00:34.191 --> 00:00:37.358
(bright upbeat music)
00:00:45.000 --> 00:00:46.890
Here are some words I
came up with earlier,
00:00:46.890 --> 00:00:48.240
cooking show style.
00:00:48.240 --> 00:00:50.400
Linear, which means in a straight line,
00:00:50.400 --> 00:00:53.310
to delineate, which means
to describe in detail
00:00:53.310 --> 00:00:54.660
or draw out borders
00:00:54.660 --> 00:00:57.480
and perhaps, obviously,
the word line itself.
00:00:57.480 --> 00:00:59.190
But let's dive into align
00:00:59.190 --> 00:01:00.570
because if you're anything like me,
00:01:00.570 --> 00:01:03.633
you're wondering about
that G, why isn't it align?
00:01:04.560 --> 00:01:06.270
I will spare you the lecture
00:01:06.270 --> 00:01:08.580
and say simply that it came from French.
00:01:08.580 --> 00:01:09.570
Don't worry about it.
00:01:09.570 --> 00:01:12.510
We just don't say it, in the
same way we don't say the G
00:01:12.510 --> 00:01:16.680
in sign, or, at least, we
don't say it as a /g/ sound.
00:01:16.680 --> 00:01:18.180
I find this stuff fascinating.
00:01:18.180 --> 00:01:20.430
I could basically keep
talking about this forever,
00:01:20.430 --> 00:01:23.190
but I'm trying to keep these
videos short and snackable.
00:01:23.190 --> 00:01:26.610
So let's use align in some sentences.
00:01:26.610 --> 00:01:28.200
You can use it literally, right?
00:01:28.200 --> 00:01:29.550
Like, all lined up.
00:01:29.550 --> 00:01:30.840
When the planet's aligned,
00:01:30.840 --> 00:01:32.790
are powers we're at their greatest, right?
00:01:32.790 --> 00:01:35.190
You can draw a straight line from Neptune
00:01:35.190 --> 00:01:38.760
straight through to the
sun, straight enough.
00:01:38.760 --> 00:01:41.223
The planets aligned,
00:01:42.540 --> 00:01:45.900
but you can also use it
figuratively, non literally
00:01:45.900 --> 00:01:47.685
to say that people agree.
00:01:47.685 --> 00:01:50.520
Jamelle and I aligned on the fact
00:01:50.520 --> 00:01:53.610
that the cereal milk is
the best part of breakfast.
00:01:53.610 --> 00:01:56.550
Here we are, in fact, in agreement,
00:01:56.550 --> 00:01:59.310
in alignment, in fact,
I'll write that down.
00:01:59.310 --> 00:02:00.900
So this is the noun form.
00:02:00.900 --> 00:02:05.900
We've added -ment to turn it
into a noun, in alignment.
00:02:06.030 --> 00:02:07.980
And one last sentence.
00:02:07.980 --> 00:02:11.220
Supriya had to align
with the other rebels.
00:02:11.220 --> 00:02:14.310
She had to get in line,
they had to link up.
00:02:14.310 --> 00:02:17.340
So I hope you and I are
all aligned on the meaning
00:02:17.340 --> 00:02:19.470
of this word, because I am out of time.
00:02:19.470 --> 00:02:22.140
Until the next one,
you can learn anything.
00:02:22.140 --> 00:02:22.973
David, out.
|
Regulate | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hmn4DvB3djU | vtt | https://www.youtube.com/api/timedtext?v=hmn4DvB3djU&ei=n1WUZa-kHPTDmLAPrcCsoAU&caps=asr&opi=112496729&xoaf=5&hl=en&ip=0.0.0.0&ipbits=0&expire=1704245263&sparams=ip%2Cipbits%2Cexpire%2Cv%2Cei%2Ccaps%2Copi%2Cxoaf&signature=D5EFF6BC39F0CBC91265562861D3A111B30E66A3.ACA5B061C66461524A50625FD80B3333F431F4C3&key=yt8&lang=en&name=Default&fmt=vtt | en | WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en
00:00:00.210 --> 00:00:01.890
- [David] All right,
wordsmiths, what's up?
00:00:01.890 --> 00:00:04.530
The word of the day today is regulate.
00:00:04.530 --> 00:00:07.923
It means to make rules
that control something.
00:00:08.880 --> 00:00:10.680
I'll throw in a 10-second music break.
00:00:10.680 --> 00:00:15.000
Tell me if you can identify
any other common English words
00:00:15.000 --> 00:00:17.220
that start with reg.
00:00:17.220 --> 00:00:19.882
All right, here we go, music break.
00:00:19.882 --> 00:00:28.444
(groovy music made by my wonderful colleague Walt)
00:00:30.150 --> 00:00:33.180
All right, so some
related words are regular,
00:00:33.180 --> 00:00:34.620
regiment, regime.
00:00:34.620 --> 00:00:38.130
All of these words are
related to control or order.
00:00:38.130 --> 00:00:40.440
Regulate comes from the Latin root reg,
00:00:40.440 --> 00:00:42.690
meaning straight like a ruler.
00:00:42.690 --> 00:00:46.140
Something that's regular
follows a rule or a pattern.
00:00:46.140 --> 00:00:47.490
It's predictable.
00:00:47.490 --> 00:00:49.590
So something that is regulated
00:00:49.590 --> 00:00:51.450
has been controlled by a rule.
00:00:51.450 --> 00:00:53.310
That's what that ate part means.
00:00:53.310 --> 00:00:55.380
It's a word part that makes a verb,
00:00:55.380 --> 00:00:58.140
because regulate is a
verb, it's an action word.
00:00:58.140 --> 00:01:00.420
So let's use regulate in some sentences.
00:01:00.420 --> 00:01:02.317
You can use it in a literal sense like
00:01:02.317 --> 00:01:06.030
"This valve regulates how much
fuel goes into the engine."
00:01:06.030 --> 00:01:09.150
It is literally controlling
the rate of fuel release.
00:01:09.150 --> 00:01:12.240
But you can also use regulate
to refer to lawmaking.
00:01:12.240 --> 00:01:13.980
And I can use another word part
00:01:13.980 --> 00:01:16.470
to make this verb into a noun.
00:01:16.470 --> 00:01:18.300
Okay, so we've got the word regulate,
00:01:18.300 --> 00:01:20.710
and let me lop off the E on the end
00:01:21.960 --> 00:01:24.240
and add I-O-N.
00:01:24.240 --> 00:01:27.240
And now it's a noun, regulation.
00:01:27.240 --> 00:01:29.737
Another word for a legal rule.
00:01:29.737 --> 00:01:32.070
"State regulations only allow you to catch
00:01:32.070 --> 00:01:33.030
three fish a week."
00:01:33.030 --> 00:01:35.700
So here's two fisherfolk, doot, doot.
00:01:35.700 --> 00:01:39.810
This woman has three fish, so she's fine.
00:01:39.810 --> 00:01:41.340
This man has four fish,
00:01:41.340 --> 00:01:44.910
so he's probably gonna get a
fine from Fish and Wildlife
00:01:44.910 --> 00:01:47.130
because he didn't adhere
to the regulations.
00:01:47.130 --> 00:01:50.520
Sorry pal, you've been
canceled by the government.
00:01:50.520 --> 00:01:53.193
All right, you can learn
anything, David out.
|
Le Châtelier's principle | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B2pP02GEZL4 | vtt | https://www.youtube.com/api/timedtext?v=B2pP02GEZL4&ei=n1WUZeyZH9LCp-oP7YuDWA&caps=asr&opi=112496729&xoaf=5&hl=en&ip=0.0.0.0&ipbits=0&expire=1704245263&sparams=ip%2Cipbits%2Cexpire%2Cv%2Cei%2Ccaps%2Copi%2Cxoaf&signature=24DB29D1BDA27369B5F00D4BB646ABFB7D66FD37.60F2D8E777AD715506B03D7A57A6EA975B87D382&key=yt8&lang=en&name=Default&fmt=vtt | en | WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en
00:00:01.176 --> 00:00:03.900
- [Instructor] Let's imagine a reaction
00:00:03.900 --> 00:00:05.400
that is in equilibrium.
00:00:05.400 --> 00:00:10.400
So A plus B, they can
react to form C plus D,
00:00:10.530 --> 00:00:11.850
or you could go the other way around.
00:00:11.850 --> 00:00:15.390
C plus D could react to form A plus B.
00:00:15.390 --> 00:00:17.670
And we assume that
they've all been hanging
00:00:17.670 --> 00:00:20.490
around long enough for
this to be in equilibrium
00:00:20.490 --> 00:00:24.060
so that the reaction that goes
from A plus B to C plus D,
00:00:24.060 --> 00:00:25.530
it's happening at the same rate
00:00:25.530 --> 00:00:29.790
as the reaction from C plus D to A plus B.
00:00:29.790 --> 00:00:31.800
Now what we're gonna do is imagine
00:00:31.800 --> 00:00:35.520
what would happen if we
disturb this equilibrium,
00:00:35.520 --> 00:00:37.980
and let's say we disturb this equilibrium
00:00:37.980 --> 00:00:42.960
by taking some C and D out of,
00:00:42.960 --> 00:00:45.210
let's say this was a
solution of some kind.
00:00:45.210 --> 00:00:50.190
So I just one time reduced
the concentration of C and D.
00:00:50.190 --> 00:00:51.900
Well, that disturbance, first of all,
00:00:51.900 --> 00:00:54.300
is going to throw us out of equilibrium,
00:00:54.300 --> 00:00:57.000
because now the reaction
that goes from C plus D
00:00:57.000 --> 00:01:00.060
to A plus B isn't going to
be able to happen as often.
00:01:00.060 --> 00:01:01.740
'Cause I just took C and D out,
00:01:01.740 --> 00:01:04.080
they're not going to bump
into each other enough
00:01:04.080 --> 00:01:07.470
to now form A and B at the same rate.
00:01:07.470 --> 00:01:09.870
So if you think about the net direction
00:01:09.870 --> 00:01:11.790
until we hit a new equilibrium,
00:01:11.790 --> 00:01:13.620
this is going to happen less.
00:01:13.620 --> 00:01:15.300
and this, initially, is going
00:01:15.300 --> 00:01:16.920
to be happening at the same amount.
00:01:16.920 --> 00:01:19.950
So you're going to have a net direction
00:01:19.950 --> 00:01:22.020
until we hit equilibrium again
00:01:22.020 --> 00:01:26.040
that goes from A plus B to C plus D.
00:01:26.040 --> 00:01:27.240
And then if you wait long enough,
00:01:27.240 --> 00:01:29.940
you're going to hit
back at an equilibrium.
00:01:29.940 --> 00:01:31.830
Now, let's think about what just happened.
00:01:31.830 --> 00:01:35.400
We disturbed the equilibrium
by taking C and D out.
00:01:35.400 --> 00:01:37.500
Until we hit our new equilibrium,
00:01:37.500 --> 00:01:41.010
we have more of the
reaction going from A plus B
00:01:41.010 --> 00:01:43.500
to C plus D on a net basis.
00:01:43.500 --> 00:01:44.790
And so it's relieving it.
00:01:44.790 --> 00:01:48.540
It's relieving the fact that
we took some C plus D out.
00:01:48.540 --> 00:01:51.840
And it's going to reestablish
a new equilibrium.
00:01:51.840 --> 00:01:54.720
If we took A plus B out, or A and B out,
00:01:54.720 --> 00:01:57.420
or even just one of them, A or B out,
00:01:57.420 --> 00:01:59.430
then you would have the opposite happen.
00:01:59.430 --> 00:02:01.560
But either way, if you disturb it,
00:02:01.560 --> 00:02:04.350
the system shifts to
relieve the disturbance
00:02:04.350 --> 00:02:06.570
and re-establish equilibrium.
00:02:06.570 --> 00:02:08.640
Now this principle, you might imagine,
00:02:08.640 --> 00:02:10.440
'cause it's been sitting
here the whole time,
00:02:10.440 --> 00:02:14.490
is Le Chatelier's Principle
that describes that.
00:02:14.490 --> 00:02:17.520
And it's not just by
disturbing it by changing,
00:02:17.520 --> 00:02:21.180
say, concentrations of
reactants or products.
00:02:21.180 --> 00:02:23.010
You could be changing other things.
00:02:23.010 --> 00:02:27.330
So for example, let's imagine
the reversible reaction,
00:02:27.330 --> 00:02:31.350
let's say A plus B, and let's
say these are all gases.
00:02:31.350 --> 00:02:34.650
So A plus B can react to form C,
00:02:34.650 --> 00:02:37.260
or C could react to,
00:02:37.260 --> 00:02:40.050
I guess you could imagine,
break up into A plus B.
00:02:40.050 --> 00:02:42.513
And let's imagine that
these are all gases.
00:02:43.470 --> 00:02:45.000
So let's assume that it's happening
00:02:45.000 --> 00:02:47.670
in a container of a certain size.
00:02:47.670 --> 00:02:50.580
And let's say that I were to shrink
00:02:50.580 --> 00:02:52.920
the volume of that container.
00:02:52.920 --> 00:02:56.160
What do you think is going
to happen in that situation?
00:02:56.160 --> 00:02:59.880
Well, if I shrink the
volume of that container,
00:02:59.880 --> 00:03:02.370
then you have a situation where A and B
00:03:02.370 --> 00:03:04.140
are going to bump into each other more.
00:03:04.140 --> 00:03:06.540
They're going to collide
into each other more.
00:03:06.540 --> 00:03:11.540
And so you are going to have a
net direction go in that one.
00:03:11.580 --> 00:03:16.580
You'll still have some C reacting
to break up into A and B,
00:03:16.650 --> 00:03:19.230
but you're going to have
more A and B reacting,
00:03:19.230 --> 00:03:21.810
bumping into each other,
colliding each other to form C,
00:03:21.810 --> 00:03:24.240
until we hit a new equilibrium.
00:03:24.240 --> 00:03:26.880
And notice what is happening there.
00:03:26.880 --> 00:03:30.060
When A plus B reacts to form C,
00:03:30.060 --> 00:03:33.150
it decreases the number of
particles in the container
00:03:33.150 --> 00:03:35.760
and it decreases the pressure.
00:03:35.760 --> 00:03:39.810
And so, eventually you're
going to hit a new equilibrium.
00:03:39.810 --> 00:03:41.760
But when you disturb that equilibrium
00:03:41.760 --> 00:03:43.470
by changing the volume,
00:03:43.470 --> 00:03:46.740
the system shifted to
relieve that disturbance.
00:03:46.740 --> 00:03:49.860
In that case, the disturbance
was an increased pressure
00:03:49.860 --> 00:03:52.233
and it reestablished the equilibrium.
00:03:53.070 --> 00:03:55.110
Let's imagine another reaction.
00:03:55.110 --> 00:03:58.590
Let's imagine A plus B.
00:03:58.590 --> 00:04:00.840
And let's say this is
an endothermic reaction.
00:04:00.840 --> 00:04:04.830
So I'm gonna treat energy
really as a reactant here.
00:04:04.830 --> 00:04:07.324
Just to make it clear that
this is an endothermic reaction
00:04:07.324 --> 00:04:10.470
that could form C plus D.
00:04:10.470 --> 00:04:13.710
Or you could have C plus D react
00:04:13.710 --> 00:04:15.750
to form A plus B plus energy.
00:04:15.750 --> 00:04:18.180
So the reaction that starts with C plus D
00:04:18.180 --> 00:04:20.370
and forms A plus B in energy,
00:04:20.370 --> 00:04:23.010
well, that's going to be exothermic.
00:04:23.010 --> 00:04:25.800
So let's imagine what would happen here,
00:04:25.800 --> 00:04:27.900
and let's imagine it's at equilibrium,
00:04:27.900 --> 00:04:30.180
but then we disturb that equilibrium.
00:04:30.180 --> 00:04:32.610
What happens if we
disturb that equilibrium
00:04:32.610 --> 00:04:36.570
by adding more energy over here?
00:04:36.570 --> 00:04:38.837
Well, if I add more energy,
00:04:38.837 --> 00:04:40.410
it's going to be easier
00:04:40.410 --> 00:04:43.710
for this endothermic reaction to occur,
00:04:43.710 --> 00:04:46.110
and so it's going to
disturb the equilibrium
00:04:46.110 --> 00:04:49.140
in that direction right over there.
00:04:49.140 --> 00:04:53.370
And so you're going to have
that energy really get used up
00:04:53.370 --> 00:04:55.590
to form more C and D.
00:04:55.590 --> 00:04:57.570
You could imagine the other way.
00:04:57.570 --> 00:05:00.660
What happens if I were
to take energy away?
00:05:00.660 --> 00:05:05.660
Well, you need energy for A and
B to react to form C plus D.
00:05:05.700 --> 00:05:08.040
So if you were to take energy away,
00:05:08.040 --> 00:05:10.860
then the reaction that starts with A and B
00:05:10.860 --> 00:05:12.600
is going to happen less.
00:05:12.600 --> 00:05:15.180
And so you're gonna have a net direction
00:05:15.180 --> 00:05:19.110
with C plus D reacting to form A plus B
00:05:19.110 --> 00:05:21.540
until you hit a new equilibrium.
00:05:21.540 --> 00:05:23.430
But the important thing to realize here
00:05:23.430 --> 00:05:25.050
is in every situation,
00:05:25.050 --> 00:05:26.700
whether we're disturbing the equilibrium
00:05:26.700 --> 00:05:29.550
by changing concentration,
by changing volume,
00:05:29.550 --> 00:05:31.380
and therefore changing pressure,
00:05:31.380 --> 00:05:33.750
or you're adding or taking away energy,
00:05:33.750 --> 00:05:36.300
which you could do in the form
of changing the temperature,
00:05:36.300 --> 00:05:39.900
the system shifts to
relieve that disturbance
00:05:39.900 --> 00:05:42.510
and re-establish a new equilibrium,
00:05:42.510 --> 00:05:45.303
which, once again, is Le
Chatelier's Principle.
|
Reversible reactions and equilibrium | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i_LCF8gmcWQ | vtt | https://www.youtube.com/api/timedtext?v=i_LCF8gmcWQ&ei=n1WUZYq_IoHSxN8Pg6KsuAY&caps=asr&opi=112496729&xoaf=5&hl=en&ip=0.0.0.0&ipbits=0&expire=1704245263&sparams=ip%2Cipbits%2Cexpire%2Cv%2Cei%2Ccaps%2Copi%2Cxoaf&signature=B21B1AB456151AB8A1C9545AA27F44921AF5D5B0.E77CFDD8FA9EFEC9C31C17C047BA193DED5C3C60&key=yt8&lang=en&name=Default&fmt=vtt | en | WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en
00:00:00.630 --> 00:00:02.130
- [Instructor] Let's imagine a reaction
00:00:02.130 --> 00:00:06.270
where we start with the reactants A and B,
00:00:06.270 --> 00:00:11.270
and they react to form
the products C and D.
00:00:12.660 --> 00:00:16.350
Now, it turns out that
in certain situations,
00:00:16.350 --> 00:00:19.290
the reaction could go the other way.
00:00:19.290 --> 00:00:22.470
You could start with C + D,
00:00:22.470 --> 00:00:27.470
and those could react
to end up with A + B.
00:00:27.660 --> 00:00:29.490
So when you have a reaction like this,
00:00:29.490 --> 00:00:31.230
that could go in either direction,
00:00:31.230 --> 00:00:33.870
we call that a reversible reaction.
00:00:33.870 --> 00:00:35.700
And that's why the title of this video,
00:00:35.700 --> 00:00:38.430
Reversible Reactions and Equilibrium.
00:00:38.430 --> 00:00:42.390
And one way to say that it
could go in either direction is
00:00:42.390 --> 00:00:46.620
to write it like this, A + B.
00:00:46.620 --> 00:00:48.720
And we use these half arrows.
00:00:48.720 --> 00:00:50.160
So it could go in that direction,
00:00:50.160 --> 00:00:53.340
or it could go in this direction.
00:00:53.340 --> 00:00:56.250
You could go to C + D.
00:00:56.250 --> 00:00:58.410
And what's going to happen is
00:00:58.410 --> 00:01:02.640
the reaction is going to
go in both directions.
00:01:02.640 --> 00:01:06.600
So A + B is going to react to form C + D,
00:01:06.600 --> 00:01:11.600
and C + D is going to react to form A + B.
00:01:11.610 --> 00:01:12.690
And at some point,
00:01:12.690 --> 00:01:15.090
you're going to be hitting an equilibrium.
00:01:15.090 --> 00:01:17.820
That's the point at which the
forward reaction is happening
00:01:17.820 --> 00:01:19.740
at the same rate as,
00:01:19.740 --> 00:01:22.530
I guess you could consider it
to be the backward reaction,
00:01:22.530 --> 00:01:25.650
going from C + D to A + B.
00:01:25.650 --> 00:01:27.270
Now, once you're at equilibrium,
00:01:27.270 --> 00:01:29.460
it doesn't mean that the reactions stop.
00:01:29.460 --> 00:01:33.960
It just means that the rate of
going from A + B to C + D is
00:01:33.960 --> 00:01:38.960
the same as the rate of
going from C + D to A + B.
00:01:39.120 --> 00:01:41.640
This is a really important
thing to realize.
00:01:41.640 --> 00:01:43.890
A common misconception
is that people think,
00:01:43.890 --> 00:01:47.880
at equilibrium, somehow
these reactions stop.
00:01:47.880 --> 00:01:49.320
That is not the case.
00:01:49.320 --> 00:01:52.050
It's just that the rate
of the forward reaction
00:01:52.050 --> 00:01:56.460
and the backward reaction
has now become the same rate.
00:01:56.460 --> 00:02:00.840
So even though you continue
to have A + B forming C + D,
00:02:00.840 --> 00:02:04.800
you have the same rate at
which C + D is now also going
00:02:04.800 --> 00:02:07.740
and forming A + B.
00:02:07.740 --> 00:02:11.520
Another misconception here
is that the concentrations
00:02:11.520 --> 00:02:14.670
of A + B and C + D, once
you're in equilibrium,
00:02:14.670 --> 00:02:16.410
they would've stabilized,
00:02:16.410 --> 00:02:20.460
but it's not necessarily that
the concentrations are equal.
00:02:20.460 --> 00:02:22.080
The point at which we're in equilibrium,
00:02:22.080 --> 00:02:25.290
you might have a much lower
concentration of C + D
00:02:25.290 --> 00:02:27.960
than A + B, or the other way around.
00:02:27.960 --> 00:02:31.200
What equilibrium is telling
us is that at equilibrium,
00:02:31.200 --> 00:02:33.450
the forward rate of reaction is equal
00:02:33.450 --> 00:02:36.603
to the backward rate of reaction.
|
Catalysts | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8TuPmpNfoX8 | vtt | https://www.youtube.com/api/timedtext?v=8TuPmpNfoX8&ei=n1WUZcz0GtqzvdIPsJ228A4&caps=asr&opi=112496729&xoaf=5&hl=en&ip=0.0.0.0&ipbits=0&expire=1704245263&sparams=ip%2Cipbits%2Cexpire%2Cv%2Cei%2Ccaps%2Copi%2Cxoaf&signature=CD912EA9E1893282C6D1A74E5392D18F2121F864.B37CA20FA446F610A60BC2C38958DEDAF37A4713&key=yt8&lang=en&name=Default&fmt=vtt | en | WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en
00:00:00.180 --> 00:00:01.013
- [Instructor] In this video,
00:00:01.013 --> 00:00:04.050
we're gonna talk a little
bit about catalysts.
00:00:04.050 --> 00:00:08.430
So let's first imagine
that we have two reactants,
00:00:08.430 --> 00:00:09.930
and I'm going to simplify things
00:00:09.930 --> 00:00:12.210
with these overly simplified drawings.
00:00:12.210 --> 00:00:15.720
So let's say you have this
reactant right over here,
00:00:15.720 --> 00:00:17.580
and I'm drawing it that way for a reason.
00:00:17.580 --> 00:00:20.370
And then let's say I have this reactant
00:00:20.370 --> 00:00:23.940
that looks something like this.
00:00:23.940 --> 00:00:26.340
And obviously if we're talking
about a chemical reaction,
00:00:26.340 --> 00:00:28.260
we're not usually talking about just
00:00:28.260 --> 00:00:29.820
two different molecules.
00:00:29.820 --> 00:00:34.170
We're talking about many
trillions of molecules
00:00:34.170 --> 00:00:37.020
that are oftentimes in
some form of a solution.
00:00:37.020 --> 00:00:40.770
But here we're just giving an
example of one of each types
00:00:40.770 --> 00:00:42.780
of the reactant molecules.
00:00:42.780 --> 00:00:47.010
So let's imagine that if they are able to
00:00:47.010 --> 00:00:50.190
run into each other with sufficient energy
00:00:50.190 --> 00:00:53.040
and with the right
orientation, they're going
00:00:53.040 --> 00:00:55.200
to bond with each other.
00:00:55.200 --> 00:00:58.800
So these two reactants would react
00:00:58.800 --> 00:01:02.460
to form this product that looks like this.
00:01:02.460 --> 00:01:07.460
And obviously, as I mentioned,
this is a oversimplification,
00:01:07.500 --> 00:01:10.530
but it gives you the general idea.
00:01:10.530 --> 00:01:15.530
So it might form a molecule
that looks like that.
00:01:15.540 --> 00:01:19.230
Now, as we mentioned, it
has to have the right energy
00:01:19.230 --> 00:01:21.420
and the right orientation.
00:01:21.420 --> 00:01:26.420
So we can think about this
in terms of an energy diagram
00:01:26.527 --> 00:01:30.180
right over here, where in
this axis, let's call this
00:01:30.180 --> 00:01:33.180
the progress,
00:01:33.180 --> 00:01:36.633
progress of reaction.
00:01:37.770 --> 00:01:41.673
And in this axis, let's just say energy.
00:01:43.470 --> 00:01:45.150
Energy.
00:01:45.150 --> 00:01:47.730
Now we have our reactants
00:01:47.730 --> 00:01:49.950
that are at a certain
energy level when they are
00:01:49.950 --> 00:01:52.200
left to their own devices.
00:01:52.200 --> 00:01:56.910
But if they have enough
energy added to the system,
00:01:56.910 --> 00:01:59.640
they are able to react.
00:01:59.640 --> 00:02:01.950
And then after they react,
00:02:01.950 --> 00:02:04.350
the product will have a certain energy.
00:02:04.350 --> 00:02:05.550
So this is a reaction where we've had
00:02:05.550 --> 00:02:07.680
to put energy into the reaction
00:02:07.680 --> 00:02:11.490
'cause the products have a
higher energy than the reactants.
00:02:11.490 --> 00:02:13.110
So this is the prod.
00:02:13.110 --> 00:02:14.520
In this case, there's just one product,
00:02:14.520 --> 00:02:15.750
let's call it products.
00:02:15.750 --> 00:02:18.273
And let's call this reactants.
00:02:19.380 --> 00:02:21.330
Now this hump over here where we have
00:02:21.330 --> 00:02:23.640
to put even more energy than we end up
00:02:23.640 --> 00:02:26.280
with our products at the end, we call
00:02:26.280 --> 00:02:29.200
that the activation energy, the energy
00:02:29.200 --> 00:02:31.020
that you need in order
00:02:31.020 --> 00:02:34.320
to make this reaction
happen from left to right.
00:02:34.320 --> 00:02:38.613
So this right over here
is the activation energy.
00:02:39.870 --> 00:02:42.393
Activation energy.
00:02:43.230 --> 00:02:47.280
Now I said that this video was
going to be about catalysts.
00:02:47.280 --> 00:02:49.380
What does a catalyst do?
00:02:49.380 --> 00:02:51.750
Well, a catalyst can lower
00:02:51.750 --> 00:02:55.290
the activation energy for a reaction.
00:02:55.290 --> 00:02:57.450
It's not a part of the reaction.
00:02:57.450 --> 00:02:59.070
You could view it as a bystander.
00:02:59.070 --> 00:03:01.590
It's something that's
helping the reaction happen.
00:03:01.590 --> 00:03:04.110
It's not getting used up in the reaction,
00:03:04.110 --> 00:03:06.120
it's not getting produced in the reaction.
00:03:06.120 --> 00:03:08.340
It's just helping the reaction happen.
00:03:08.340 --> 00:03:11.730
And it would help it by
lowering that activation energy.
00:03:11.730 --> 00:03:13.980
So if you have the presence of a catalyst,
00:03:13.980 --> 00:03:16.380
it might look something like this.
00:03:16.380 --> 00:03:17.880
So all of a sudden you need less energy
00:03:17.880 --> 00:03:20.790
to get over this hump
and to form the products.
00:03:20.790 --> 00:03:24.120
Now what could a catalyst
actually be that does that?
00:03:24.120 --> 00:03:26.220
Well, we could think
about biological systems
00:03:26.220 --> 00:03:30.510
where a common catalyst
is an enzyme or enzymes.
00:03:30.510 --> 00:03:33.210
And one way that they lower
the activation energy,
00:03:33.210 --> 00:03:35.360
it could be providing a surface
00:03:35.360 --> 00:03:37.470
where the reactants can react.
00:03:37.470 --> 00:03:40.170
It could be to make it a
little bit easier for them
00:03:40.170 --> 00:03:42.043
to get in the right orientation.
00:03:42.043 --> 00:03:46.365
So for example, imagine
if you had a huge enzyme
00:03:46.365 --> 00:03:49.350
that looked something like this.
00:03:49.350 --> 00:03:53.550
And this once again is
an over simplification.
00:03:53.550 --> 00:03:57.750
And it just happened to be
that this part of the enzyme,
00:03:57.750 --> 00:04:01.560
it's able to bond to that first reactant.
00:04:01.560 --> 00:04:03.690
Lemme do that same color,
00:04:03.690 --> 00:04:05.250
to that first reactant
00:04:05.250 --> 00:04:09.570
and puts it into the right
orientation where this other part
00:04:09.570 --> 00:04:12.630
of the enzyme can bond
with that second reactant
00:04:12.630 --> 00:04:16.260
and puts it in the right
orientation so that you don't need
00:04:16.260 --> 00:04:19.500
quite as much energy for them to be able
00:04:19.500 --> 00:04:21.180
to react with each other.
00:04:21.180 --> 00:04:23.550
And you might say, well,
why do we even need these?
00:04:23.550 --> 00:04:25.230
Or why are enzymes even important?
00:04:25.230 --> 00:04:27.570
Remember, enzymes are type of catalyst.
00:04:27.570 --> 00:04:29.940
Well, it turns out that your body,
00:04:29.940 --> 00:04:33.930
or many biological systems need
a lot of reactions to occur,
00:04:33.930 --> 00:04:35.370
but without a catalyst,
00:04:35.370 --> 00:04:38.820
and in this case, in a biological
system without an enzyme,
00:04:38.820 --> 00:04:41.820
the temperature would have to
be too high, where all sorts
00:04:41.820 --> 00:04:43.680
of other bad things will happen.
00:04:43.680 --> 00:04:46.980
But by having catalysts,
in this case, an enzyme,
00:04:46.980 --> 00:04:49.740
it allows the reaction to
proceed, in this case from left
00:04:49.740 --> 00:04:52.860
to right, without having
the energy be so high
00:04:52.860 --> 00:04:55.620
that it's damaging to
the system as a whole.
00:04:55.620 --> 00:04:57.840
So it's a label to have
this reaction happen
00:04:57.840 --> 00:05:01.110
at a lower energy or in
this biological system
00:05:01.110 --> 00:05:02.373
at a lower temperature.
|
Electronegativity and bond type | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xv9igHCrnzQ | vtt | https://www.youtube.com/api/timedtext?v=xv9igHCrnzQ&ei=n1WUZaH3H4mevdIPiZuGmAQ&caps=asr&opi=112496729&xoaf=5&hl=en&ip=0.0.0.0&ipbits=0&expire=1704245263&sparams=ip%2Cipbits%2Cexpire%2Cv%2Cei%2Ccaps%2Copi%2Cxoaf&signature=43B0E5F13785D97C078656030AE26C4BE41E0DC0.E7D7DF16AE9A685562F694BEA2C144B45D3782F6&key=yt8&lang=en&name=Default&fmt=vtt | en | WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en
00:00:02.040 --> 00:00:03.420
- [Instructor]
Electronegativity is probably
00:00:03.420 --> 00:00:05.280
the most important concept to understand
00:00:05.280 --> 00:00:06.660
in organic chemistry.
00:00:06.660 --> 00:00:08.670
We're gonna use a definition
that Linus Pauling gives
00:00:08.670 --> 00:00:11.340
in his book, "The Nature
of the Chemical Bond".
00:00:11.340 --> 00:00:14.310
So Linus Pauling says
that electronegativity
00:00:14.310 --> 00:00:18.240
refers to the power of
an atom in a molecule
00:00:18.240 --> 00:00:20.700
to attract electrons to itself.
00:00:20.700 --> 00:00:22.290
So if I look at a molecule,
00:00:22.290 --> 00:00:25.238
I'm going to compare two
atoms in that molecule.
00:00:25.238 --> 00:00:28.200
I'm going to compare carbon to oxygen
00:00:28.200 --> 00:00:30.900
in terms of the electronegativity.
00:00:30.900 --> 00:00:33.060
And to do that, I need to
look over here in the right
00:00:33.060 --> 00:00:34.500
at the organic periodic table,
00:00:34.500 --> 00:00:36.240
which shows the elements
most commonly used
00:00:36.240 --> 00:00:38.340
in organic chemistry, and then in blue,
00:00:38.340 --> 00:00:41.220
it gives us the Pauling
scale for electronegativity.
00:00:41.220 --> 00:00:43.230
So Linus Pauling actually calculated
00:00:43.230 --> 00:00:44.909
electronegativity values for the elements
00:00:44.909 --> 00:00:46.980
and put them into the table,
00:00:46.980 --> 00:00:49.560
and that allows us to
compare different elements
00:00:49.560 --> 00:00:51.480
in terms of their electronegativities.
00:00:51.480 --> 00:00:53.228
For example, we are concerned with carbon,
00:00:53.228 --> 00:00:55.683
which has an electronegativity
value of 2.5,
00:00:57.000 --> 00:00:58.787
and we're going to compare that to oxygen,
00:00:58.787 --> 00:01:02.760
which has an electronegativity
value of 3.5.
00:01:02.760 --> 00:01:06.540
So oxygen is more
electronegative than carbon.
00:01:06.540 --> 00:01:09.300
And the definition tells us
00:01:09.300 --> 00:01:11.280
that if oxygen is more electronegative,
00:01:11.280 --> 00:01:14.880
oxygen has a greater power to
attract electrons to itself
00:01:14.880 --> 00:01:15.960
than carbon does.
00:01:15.960 --> 00:01:17.277
And so if you think about the electrons
00:01:17.277 --> 00:01:19.944
and the covalent bond
between carbon and oxygen
00:01:19.944 --> 00:01:22.643
that are shared, they're shared unequally,
00:01:22.643 --> 00:01:24.601
because oxygen is more electronegative.
00:01:24.601 --> 00:01:27.480
Oxygen's going to pull
those electrons in red
00:01:27.480 --> 00:01:28.950
closer to itself.
00:01:28.950 --> 00:01:31.440
And since electrons
are negatively charged,
00:01:31.440 --> 00:01:34.156
the oxygen's gonna get a little
bit more negative charge,
00:01:34.156 --> 00:01:35.332
and so it's going to have
00:01:35.332 --> 00:01:38.550
what we call a partial
negative charge on it.
00:01:38.550 --> 00:01:39.690
So partial negative,
00:01:39.690 --> 00:01:43.590
partial sign is a lowercase
Greek letter delta.
00:01:43.590 --> 00:01:45.990
And so the oxygen is partially negative.
00:01:45.990 --> 00:01:48.810
It's pulling the electrons
in red closer to itself.
00:01:48.810 --> 00:01:52.020
Another way to show the movement
of those electrons in red
00:01:52.020 --> 00:01:54.390
closer to the oxygen would
be this funny arrow here.
00:01:54.390 --> 00:01:56.550
So the arrow points in the
direction of the movement
00:01:56.550 --> 00:01:58.740
of the electrons in red.
00:01:58.740 --> 00:02:02.790
So carbon is losing some
of those electrons in red.
00:02:02.790 --> 00:02:05.700
Carbon is losing a little
bit of electron density.
00:02:05.700 --> 00:02:08.430
Carbon is losing a little
bit of negative charge.
00:02:08.430 --> 00:02:09.840
So carbon used to be neutral,
00:02:09.840 --> 00:02:12.330
but since it's losing a
little bit of negative charge,
00:02:12.330 --> 00:02:15.840
this carbon will end up being
partially positive like that.
00:02:15.840 --> 00:02:17.850
So the carbon is partially positive,
00:02:17.850 --> 00:02:20.100
and the oxygen is partially negative.
00:02:20.100 --> 00:02:22.620
That's a polarized situation, right?
00:02:22.620 --> 00:02:24.148
You have a little bit of
negative charge on one side,
00:02:24.148 --> 00:02:26.640
a little bit of positive
charge on the other side.
00:02:26.640 --> 00:02:28.710
So it's still a covalent bond,
00:02:28.710 --> 00:02:30.282
but it's a polarized covalent bond
00:02:30.282 --> 00:02:32.696
due to the differences
in electronegativities
00:02:32.696 --> 00:02:35.130
between those two atoms.
00:02:35.130 --> 00:02:37.169
Let's do a few more examples here
00:02:37.169 --> 00:02:39.830
where we show the differences
in electronegativity.
00:02:39.830 --> 00:02:42.540
So if I were thinking about a molecule
00:02:42.540 --> 00:02:44.700
that has two carbons in it,
00:02:44.700 --> 00:02:48.600
and I'm thinking about what
happens to the electrons in red,
00:02:48.600 --> 00:02:50.760
well, for this example,
00:02:50.760 --> 00:02:54.390
each carbon has the same value
for electronegativity, right?
00:02:54.390 --> 00:02:56.700
So the carbon in the
left has a value of 2.5.
00:02:56.700 --> 00:02:59.160
The carbon in the right
has a value of 2.5.
00:02:59.160 --> 00:03:02.520
That's a difference in
electronegativity of zero,
00:03:02.520 --> 00:03:05.460
which means that the electrons
in red aren't gonna move
00:03:05.460 --> 00:03:07.350
towards one carbon or
towards the other carbon.
00:03:07.350 --> 00:03:08.760
They're gonna stay in the middle,
00:03:08.760 --> 00:03:11.130
they're gonna be shared
between those two atoms.
00:03:11.130 --> 00:03:12.840
So this is a covalent bond,
00:03:12.840 --> 00:03:15.300
and there's no polarity
situation created here,
00:03:15.300 --> 00:03:17.610
since there's no difference
in electronegativity.
00:03:17.610 --> 00:03:22.170
So we call this a nonpolar
covalent bond, right?
00:03:22.170 --> 00:03:27.170
So this is a nonpolar
covalent bond, like that.
00:03:27.720 --> 00:03:29.340
Let's do another example.
00:03:29.340 --> 00:03:31.340
Let's compare carbon to hydrogen.
00:03:31.340 --> 00:03:33.142
So if I had a molecule
00:03:33.142 --> 00:03:35.779
and I have a bond between
carbon and hydrogen,
00:03:35.779 --> 00:03:39.630
and I want to know what
happens to the electrons in red
00:03:39.630 --> 00:03:42.960
between the carbon and the
hydrogen, we've seen that carbon
00:03:42.960 --> 00:03:44.860
has an electronegativity value of 2.5,
00:03:45.780 --> 00:03:49.087
and we go up here to hydrogen,
which has a value of 2.1,
00:03:50.340 --> 00:03:51.833
and so that's difference of 0.4.
00:03:53.460 --> 00:03:55.109
So there is a difference
in electronegativity
00:03:55.109 --> 00:03:58.050
between those two atoms, but
it's a very small difference.
00:03:58.050 --> 00:04:00.270
and so most textbooks
would consider the bond
00:04:00.270 --> 00:04:01.500
between carbon and hydrogen
00:04:01.500 --> 00:04:05.340
to still be a nonpolar covalent bond.
00:04:05.340 --> 00:04:06.173
All right, let's go ahead
00:04:06.173 --> 00:04:09.030
and put in the example
we did above, right.
00:04:09.030 --> 00:04:11.010
where we compared the electronegativies
00:04:11.010 --> 00:04:13.770
of carbon and oxygen, like that.
00:04:13.770 --> 00:04:15.564
When we looked up the
values, we saw that carbon
00:04:15.564 --> 00:04:18.780
had an electronegativity value of 2.5,
00:04:18.780 --> 00:04:22.470
and oxygen had a value of
3.5 for a difference of one.
00:04:22.470 --> 00:04:26.130
And that's enough to have a
polar covalent bond, right?
00:04:26.130 --> 00:04:30.160
This is a polar covalent bond
00:04:31.380 --> 00:04:33.330
between the carbon and the oxygen.
00:04:33.330 --> 00:04:35.850
So when we think about
the electrons in red,
00:04:35.850 --> 00:04:38.700
the electrons in red are
pulled closer to the oxygen,
00:04:38.700 --> 00:04:41.670
giving the oxygen a
partial negative charge,
00:04:41.670 --> 00:04:44.640
and since electron density is
moving away from the carbon,
00:04:44.640 --> 00:04:47.133
the carbon gets a partial positive charge.
00:04:48.582 --> 00:04:50.452
And so we can see that if your difference
00:04:50.452 --> 00:04:53.040
in electronegativity is one,
00:04:53.040 --> 00:04:55.440
it's considered to be
a polar covalent bond,
00:04:55.440 --> 00:04:58.530
and if your difference in
electronegativity is 0.4,
00:04:58.530 --> 00:05:00.720
that's considered to be
a nonpolar covalent bond.
00:05:00.720 --> 00:05:03.514
So somewhere in between
there must be the difference
00:05:03.514 --> 00:05:07.860
between non-polar covalent
bond and a polar covalent bond.
00:05:07.860 --> 00:05:11.730
And most textbooks will tell
you approximately somewhere
00:05:11.730 --> 00:05:13.680
in the 0.5 range.
00:05:13.680 --> 00:05:15.210
So if the difference in electronegativity
00:05:15.210 --> 00:05:17.430
is greater than 0.5, you
can go ahead and consider it
00:05:17.430 --> 00:05:19.620
to be mostly a polar covalent bond.
00:05:19.620 --> 00:05:22.770
If the difference in
electronegativity is less than 0.5,
00:05:22.770 --> 00:05:25.800
we would consider that to
be a nonpolar covalent bond.
00:05:25.800 --> 00:05:28.380
Now, I should point out that
we're using the Pauling scale
00:05:28.380 --> 00:05:29.730
for electronegativity here,
00:05:29.730 --> 00:05:31.170
and there are several different scales
00:05:31.170 --> 00:05:32.220
for electronegativity.
00:05:32.220 --> 00:05:34.740
So these numbers are not absolute.
00:05:34.740 --> 00:05:36.371
These are more relative differences,
00:05:36.371 --> 00:05:39.630
and it's the relative
difference in electronegativity
00:05:39.630 --> 00:05:41.970
that we care the most about.
00:05:41.970 --> 00:05:43.413
Let's do another example.
00:05:45.350 --> 00:05:47.880
Let's compare oxygen to hydrogen.
00:05:47.880 --> 00:05:51.120
So let's think about what
happens to the electrons
00:05:51.120 --> 00:05:52.720
between oxygen and hydrogen.
00:05:52.720 --> 00:05:55.890
So the electrons in red here.
00:05:55.890 --> 00:05:57.150
All right, so we've already seen
00:05:57.150 --> 00:05:59.550
the electronegativity values
for both of these atoms.
00:05:59.550 --> 00:06:04.550
Oxygen had a value of 3.5, and
hydrogen had a value of 2.1.
00:06:05.670 --> 00:06:08.580
So that's an electronegativity
difference of 1.4.
00:06:08.580 --> 00:06:11.520
So this is a polar covalent bond.
00:06:11.520 --> 00:06:13.703
Since oxygen is more
electronegative than hydrogen,
00:06:13.703 --> 00:06:16.510
the electrons in red are going
to move closer to the oxygen.
00:06:16.510 --> 00:06:19.830
so the oxygen's going to get
a partial negative charge,
00:06:19.830 --> 00:06:22.740
and the hydrogen's gonna get
a partial positive charge,
00:06:22.740 --> 00:06:23.573
like that.
|
London dispersion forces introduction | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h-BiBeydkys | vtt | https://www.youtube.com/api/timedtext?v=h-BiBeydkys&ei=n1WUZanCI_Gkp-oP28aWMA&caps=asr&opi=112496729&xoaf=5&hl=en&ip=0.0.0.0&ipbits=0&expire=1704245263&sparams=ip%2Cipbits%2Cexpire%2Cv%2Cei%2Ccaps%2Copi%2Cxoaf&signature=8B74C7226EF7B676B946F8B0C23DB8B296D7FA8E.0E8464D62FF0F97C9953C9386413162585A8D468&key=yt8&lang=en&name=Default&fmt=vtt | en | WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:01.590
- [Instructor] What we're
going to do in this video
00:00:01.590 --> 00:00:04.410
is start talking about forces that exist
00:00:04.410 --> 00:00:08.790
between even neutral atoms
or neutral molecules.
00:00:08.790 --> 00:00:11.130
And the first of these
intermolecular forces
00:00:11.130 --> 00:00:15.390
we will talk about are
London dispersion forces.
00:00:15.390 --> 00:00:16.980
So it sounds very fancy,
00:00:16.980 --> 00:00:18.510
but it's actually a pretty interesting
00:00:18.510 --> 00:00:20.760
and almost intuitive phenomenon.
00:00:20.760 --> 00:00:22.860
So we are used to thinking about atoms
00:00:22.860 --> 00:00:24.450
and let's just say we have a neutral atom,
00:00:24.450 --> 00:00:26.940
so it has the same number
of protons and electrons,
00:00:26.940 --> 00:00:29.340
and so that's all those
are all the protons
00:00:29.340 --> 00:00:31.800
and the neutrons in the nucleus.
00:00:31.800 --> 00:00:34.620
And then it'll have a cloud of electrons.
00:00:34.620 --> 00:00:36.271
So I'm just imagining all these electrons
00:00:36.271 --> 00:00:37.339
kind of jumping around.
00:00:37.339 --> 00:00:39.900
That's how I'm going to represent it.
00:00:39.900 --> 00:00:41.370
And let's imagine,
00:00:41.370 --> 00:00:43.110
and this is definitely not drawn to scale,
00:00:43.110 --> 00:00:45.990
the nucleus would actually
be much smaller if it was.
00:00:45.990 --> 00:00:48.658
But let's say that there is an
adjacent atom right over here
00:00:48.658 --> 00:00:50.100
and it's also neutral.
00:00:50.100 --> 00:00:52.440
Maybe it's the same type of
atom, it could be different,
00:00:52.440 --> 00:00:53.880
but we're gonna say it's neutral.
00:00:53.880 --> 00:00:57.000
And it also has an electron cloud.
00:00:57.000 --> 00:01:00.210
And so if these are
both neutral in charge,
00:01:00.210 --> 00:01:02.700
how would they be attracted to each other?
00:01:02.700 --> 00:01:05.850
And that's what London dispersion
forces actually explain.
00:01:05.850 --> 00:01:09.240
Because we have observed
that even neutral atoms
00:01:09.240 --> 00:01:12.987
and neutral molecules can
get attracted to each other.
00:01:12.987 --> 00:01:15.810
And the way to think about it is electrons
00:01:15.810 --> 00:01:18.870
are constantly jumping
around probabilistically.
00:01:18.870 --> 00:01:21.480
They're in this probability density cloud
00:01:21.480 --> 00:01:24.240
where electron could be
anywhere at any given moment,
00:01:24.240 --> 00:01:27.000
but they're not always going
to be evenly distributed.
00:01:27.000 --> 00:01:30.810
You can imagine that there is
a moment where that left atom
00:01:30.810 --> 00:01:32.910
might look like this, just for a moment
00:01:32.910 --> 00:01:35.250
where most of, or maybe slightly more
00:01:35.250 --> 00:01:37.800
of the electrons are spending
time on the left side
00:01:38.682 --> 00:01:41.100
of the atom than on the right side.
00:01:41.100 --> 00:01:43.320
So maybe it looks something like that.
00:01:43.320 --> 00:01:45.300
And so for that brief moment,
00:01:45.300 --> 00:01:47.520
you have a partial negative charge.
00:01:47.520 --> 00:01:50.370
This is the Greek letter
delta, lower case delta,
00:01:50.370 --> 00:01:53.310
which is used to denote partial charge.
00:01:53.310 --> 00:01:57.390
And on this side, you might
have a partial positive charge.
00:01:57.390 --> 00:01:59.340
Because remember, when it
was evenly distributed,
00:01:59.340 --> 00:02:00.771
the negative charge was offset
00:02:00.771 --> 00:02:03.120
by the positive charge of the nucleus.
00:02:03.120 --> 00:02:04.530
But here on the right side,
00:02:04.530 --> 00:02:05.850
because there's fewer electrons here,
00:02:05.850 --> 00:02:08.070
maybe you have a partial
positive on the left side,
00:02:08.070 --> 00:02:09.510
you have where most of the electrons
00:02:09.510 --> 00:02:11.760
are in that moment, partial negative.
00:02:11.760 --> 00:02:16.440
Now what might this induce
in the neighboring atom?
00:02:16.440 --> 00:02:17.273
Think about that.
00:02:17.273 --> 00:02:18.106
Pause the video.
00:02:18.106 --> 00:02:20.740
Think about what might happen
in the neighboring atom then?
00:02:21.780 --> 00:02:24.930
Well, we know that like
charges repel each other
00:02:24.930 --> 00:02:27.570
and opposite charges attract each other.
00:02:27.570 --> 00:02:30.210
So if we have a partial
positive charge out here
00:02:30.210 --> 00:02:32.790
on the right side of this left atom,
00:02:32.790 --> 00:02:34.740
well then the negative electrons
00:02:34.740 --> 00:02:38.040
might be attracted to
it in this right atom.
00:02:38.040 --> 00:02:40.230
So these electrons here
might actually be pulled
00:02:40.230 --> 00:02:42.540
a little bit to the left.
00:02:42.540 --> 00:02:45.120
So they might be pulled
a little bit to the left.
00:02:45.120 --> 00:02:50.120
And so that will induce
what is called a dipole.
00:02:50.430 --> 00:02:52.830
So now you'll have a
partial negative charge
00:02:52.830 --> 00:02:54.630
on the left side of this atom,
00:02:54.630 --> 00:02:58.500
and then a partial positive
charge on the right side of it.
00:02:58.500 --> 00:03:01.520
And we already had a
randomly occurring dipole
00:03:01.520 --> 00:03:04.230
on the left-hand side, but
then that would've induced
00:03:04.230 --> 00:03:06.030
a dipole on the right-hand side.
00:03:06.030 --> 00:03:08.730
A dipole is just when you
have the separation of charge
00:03:08.730 --> 00:03:11.100
where you have your
positive negative charges
00:03:11.100 --> 00:03:14.340
at two different parts
of a molecule or an atom
00:03:14.340 --> 00:03:16.410
or really, anything.
00:03:16.410 --> 00:03:18.450
But in this world, then all of a sudden,
00:03:18.450 --> 00:03:21.240
these two characters are
going to be attracted
00:03:21.240 --> 00:03:23.100
to each other or the atoms
00:03:23.100 --> 00:03:24.810
are going to be attracted to each other.
00:03:24.810 --> 00:03:29.460
And this attraction that
happens due to induced dipoles,
00:03:29.460 --> 00:03:34.460
that is exactly what London
dispersion forces is all about.
00:03:34.500 --> 00:03:36.480
You can actually call
London dispersion forces
00:03:36.480 --> 00:03:39.630
is induced dipole, induced dipole forces.
00:03:39.630 --> 00:03:41.430
They become attracted to each other
00:03:41.430 --> 00:03:44.340
because of what could start
out as a temporary imbalance
00:03:44.340 --> 00:03:47.670
of electrons, but then it induces
a dipole in the other atom
00:03:47.670 --> 00:03:50.430
or the other molecule, and
then they get attracted.
00:03:50.430 --> 00:03:52.350
So the next question you might ask is,
00:03:52.350 --> 00:03:54.270
how strong can these forces get?
00:03:54.270 --> 00:03:59.270
And that's all about a
notion of polarizability.
00:04:00.180 --> 00:04:04.020
How easy is it to polarize
an atom or molecule?
00:04:04.020 --> 00:04:08.550
And generally speaking, the
more electrons you have.
00:04:08.550 --> 00:04:13.550
So the larger the electron
cloud, larger electron cloud,
00:04:13.890 --> 00:04:18.000
electron cloud, which
is usually associated
00:04:18.000 --> 00:04:22.323
with molar mass, so usually, molar mass,
00:04:23.490 --> 00:04:26.460
then the higher polarizability
you're gonna have,
00:04:26.460 --> 00:04:27.840
'cause you're just gonna
have more electrons
00:04:27.840 --> 00:04:28.673
to play around with.
00:04:28.673 --> 00:04:31.890
If this was a helium atom,
which has a relatively small
00:04:31.890 --> 00:04:34.230
electron cloud, you couldn't have
00:04:34.230 --> 00:04:36.030
a significant imbalance.
00:04:36.030 --> 00:04:39.480
At most, you might have
two electrons on one side,
00:04:39.480 --> 00:04:41.640
which would cause some imbalance.
00:04:41.640 --> 00:04:44.730
But on the other hand,
imagine a much larger atom
00:04:44.730 --> 00:04:46.770
or a much larger molecule,
00:04:46.770 --> 00:04:49.080
you could have much more
significant imbalances.
00:04:49.080 --> 00:04:52.110
Three, four or five, 50 electrons.
00:04:52.110 --> 00:04:54.690
And that would create a
stronger temporary dipole,
00:04:54.690 --> 00:04:58.170
which would then induce a
stronger dipole in the neighbors.
00:04:58.170 --> 00:04:59.820
That could domino
00:04:59.820 --> 00:05:02.670
through the entire
sample of that molecule.
00:05:02.670 --> 00:05:07.470
So for example, if you were
to compare some noble gases
00:05:07.470 --> 00:05:10.650
to each other, and so we
can look at the noble gases
00:05:10.650 --> 00:05:12.420
here on the right-hand side.
00:05:12.420 --> 00:05:15.450
If you were to compare the
London dispersion forces
00:05:15.450 --> 00:05:18.660
between say, helium and argon,
00:05:18.660 --> 00:05:19.560
which one would you think
00:05:19.560 --> 00:05:21.810
would have higher London
dispersion forces?
00:05:21.810 --> 00:05:23.610
A bunch of helium atoms
next to each other,
00:05:23.610 --> 00:05:26.580
or a bunch of argon
atoms next to each other?
00:05:26.580 --> 00:05:30.600
Well, the argon atoms have
a larger electron cloud,
00:05:30.600 --> 00:05:34.230
so they have higher polarizability.
00:05:34.230 --> 00:05:37.860
And so you're going to have
higher London dispersion forces.
00:05:37.860 --> 00:05:40.740
And you can actually see
that in their boiling points.
00:05:40.740 --> 00:05:45.450
For example, the boiling point of helium
00:05:45.450 --> 00:05:47.790
is quite low.
00:05:47.790 --> 00:05:52.790
It is negative 268.9 degrees Celsius
00:05:53.070 --> 00:05:55.680
while the boiling point of argon,
00:05:55.680 --> 00:05:58.320
it's still at a low
temperature by our standards,
00:05:58.320 --> 00:06:00.210
but it's a much higher temperature
00:06:00.210 --> 00:06:02.100
than the boiling point for helium.
00:06:02.100 --> 00:06:07.100
It's at negative 185.8 degrees Celsius.
00:06:07.980 --> 00:06:11.070
So one way to think about
this, if you were at say,
00:06:11.070 --> 00:06:15.360
negative 270 degrees Celsius,
00:06:15.360 --> 00:06:19.260
you would find a sample of
helium in a liquid state.
00:06:19.260 --> 00:06:21.060
But as you warm things up,
00:06:21.060 --> 00:06:26.060
as you get beyond negative
268.9 degrees Celsius,
00:06:26.220 --> 00:06:29.970
you're going to see that
those London dispersion forces
00:06:29.970 --> 00:06:32.490
that are keeping those
helium atoms together
00:06:32.490 --> 00:06:34.980
sliding past each other in a liquid state,
00:06:34.980 --> 00:06:37.260
they're going to be overcome
00:06:37.260 --> 00:06:40.680
by the energy due to the temperature.
00:06:40.680 --> 00:06:43.500
And so they're going to be able
to break free of each other.
00:06:43.500 --> 00:06:46.470
And essentially, the
helium is going to boil
00:06:46.470 --> 00:06:49.530
and you're going to enter into
a gaseous state, the state
00:06:49.530 --> 00:06:51.930
that most of us are used
to seeing helium in.
00:06:51.930 --> 00:06:56.010
But that doesn't happen for
argon until a good bit warmer.
00:06:56.010 --> 00:06:57.600
Still cold by our standards.
00:06:57.600 --> 00:07:00.060
And that's because it takes more energy
00:07:00.060 --> 00:07:03.390
to overcome the London
dispersion forces of argon
00:07:03.390 --> 00:07:08.390
because the argon atoms
have larger electron clouds.
00:07:10.350 --> 00:07:13.800
So generally speaking,
the larger the molecule,
00:07:13.800 --> 00:07:15.600
because it has a larger electron cloud,
00:07:15.600 --> 00:07:17.310
it'll have higher polarizability
00:07:17.310 --> 00:07:19.203
and higher London dispersion forces.
|
This dataset houses the transcripts of openly available videos from Khan Academy. The transcripts were scrapped from Khan Academy's youtube channel