file
stringlengths 14
33
| message
stringlengths 24
126k
| Sender
stringclasses 754
values | Receiver(s)
stringlengths 0
500
|
|---|---|---|---|
arnold-j/sent_items/593.
|
subject: FW: Reminder:Interivews Thursday Trading Track
content: cancel?
-----Original Message-----
From: Buckley, Karen
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:20 PM
To: Allen, Phillip K.; Arnold, John; Arora, Harry; Benson, Robert; Brawner, Sandra F.; Carson, Mike; Cuilla, Martin; Davis, Mark Dana; Ermis, Frank; Forney, John M.; Gilbert-smith, Doug; Grigsby, Mike; Holst, Keith; Lewis, Andrew H.; Maggi, Mike; Martin, Thomas A.; May, Larry; Mckay, Brad; Mckay, Jonathan; Neal, Scott; Presto, Kevin M.; Schwieger, Jim; Shively, Hunter S.; Storey, Geoff; Sturm, Fletcher J.; Suarez, John; Zipper, Andy
Cc: Lavorato, John; Engler, Adrianne; Solis, Felicia
Subject: Reminder:Interivews Thursday Trading Track
All
A reminder that you are scheduled to interview for the Trading Track Thursday, November 1st, from 2.00 pm onwards. Resumes and schedules will be forwarded to you shortly.
Regards,
Karen Buckley
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/594.
|
subject:
content: Savita:
I'm going to need an additional report daily for the next couple weeks: for the top 50 counterparties a summary of total EOL volumes and phys gas volumes for average of rolling 30 days, average of rolling 5 days, and previous day with volume differentials in percent relative to 30 day average. For instance :
TOTAL VOLUMES
Previous day 5 day 30 day
Aquilla 240 -20% 330 +10% 300
El Paso 275 +10% 200 -20% 250
US GAS PHYS FWD FIRM <= 1 MONTH
BUY SELL
Previous day 5 day 30 day Previous day 5 day 30 day
Aquilla 24 -20% 33 +10% 30 16 -20% 24 +20% 20
El Paso 30 +20% 20 -20% 25 5 -50% 10 0 10
Please advise how quickly you can put this together.
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/595.
|
subject: RE:
content: I went already lazy
-----Original Message-----
From: Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 1:48 PM
To: Arnold, John
Subject:
Did you go this morning? If not, do you want to go after work?
|
houston <[email protected]>
|
|
arnold-j/sent_items/596.
|
subject: RE:
content: give her my email.
when are we leaving?
-----Original Message-----
From: "White, J. (Jennifer)" <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 9:59 AM
To: Arnold, John
Subject:
Kelly Busch (from Energy Argus) asked for your contact info. Is it OK to
give it to her? Email and/or cell?
The information contained in this communication is confidential and
proprietary information intended only for the individual or entity to whom
it is addressed. Any unauthorized use, distribution, copying, or disclosure
of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please contact the sender immediately. If you
believe this communication is inappropriate or offensive, please contact
Ocean Energy`s Human Resources Department.
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/597.
|
subject:
content: Bo:
I may need to post some EFS after the close today. Can you get that process approved?
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/598.
|
subject: FW: NG Delta position
content: -----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]@ENRON
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 12:47 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: NG Delta position
(See attached file: Delta11-27.xls)
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le "message") sont etablis a l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires et sont confidentiels. Si vous recevez ce message par erreur, merci de le detruire et d'en avertir immediatement l'expediteur.
Toute utilisation de ce message non conforme a sa destination, toute diffusion ou toute publication, totale ou partielle, est interdite, sauf autorisation expresse.
L'internet ne permettant pas d'assurer l'integrite de ce message, BNP PARIBAS (et ses filiales) decline(nt) toute responsabilite au titre de ce message, dans l'hypothese ou il aurait ete modifie.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message and any attachments (the "message") are intended solely for the addressees and are confidential. If you receive this message in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender.
Any use not in accord with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited except formal approval.
The internet can not guarantee the integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not therefore be liable for the message if modified.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
- Delta11-27.xls
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/599.
|
subject: RE:
content: i'm gonna try
-----Original Message-----
From: Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 12:36 PM
To: Arnold, John
Subject:
Are you going to hang out with me and Camille tonight?
|
houston <[email protected]>
|
|
arnold-j/sent_items/6.
|
subject: RE: waiting
content: yea
"Eva Pao" <[email protected]> on 05/13/2001 03:50:42 PM
Please respond to <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: waiting
nevermind. are you at work?
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 5:42 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: waiting
huh?
"Eva Pao" <[email protected]> on 05/13/2001 03:32:22 PM
Please respond to <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: waiting
No english? i got the math.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 5:24 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: waiting
probability *
payout =
1 heads .5 0 = 0
tails 2 heads .25 1
= .25
tails 3 heads .125 2
= .25
tails 4 heads .0625 4
= .25
tails 5 heads .03125 8
= .25
"Eva Pao" <[email protected]> on 05/13/2001 03:23:47 PM
Please respond to <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: waiting
which game is that?
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 5:16 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: waiting
Expected value of game = 1/2 * 0 + 1/4 * 1 + 1/8 *2 + 1/16 *4 +1/32 *
8+....
= 0 +.25 +.25 +.25 +.25 +...
= infinity
"Eva Pao" <[email protected]> on 05/13/2001 03:11:46 PM
Please respond to <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: waiting
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 4:37 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Extra credit
rules to a game:
You flip a coin. If you get tails you win 0. if you get heads, i give you
$1. Keep flipping until you get a tails, at which point you walk away with
the money. however, each heads you get after the first you double your
money. So if you flip heads 3 times and then tails, you get $4. What's
you bid/offer on playing this game? (would you pay $.5 to play? $1? $2?
what you charge me play against you?)
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/60.
|
subject: Re: Hi
content: Hey Adam:
sorry for the delay. just been very busy. congrats on joining enron. think you made the right chioce. i would recommend structuring. it's a good way to understand how enron works, how we look at and manage risk, and you get close to the trading component. a friend of mine, ed mcmichael runs the gas structuring group. try emiling him probably at [email protected]. keep in touch,
john
"Bayer, Adam Ryan" <[email protected]> on 04/10/2001 03:06:34 PM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Hi
Hi John,
I hope your gas markets are moving nicely this week. Its
been a long time since we talked, but a lot has happened.
But the most important thing has been my decision to join
Enron. At this point, I am looking around for a rotation,
and I have received a lot of advice pointing me towards
Gas/Power Structuring and RAC rotations. I am wondering if
you know some people in these areas who might be looking
for analysts. I have heard that traders work closely with
the structured finance and RAC guys, true? If you have
time please let me know if you know of anything.
Thanks,
Adam Bayer
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/600.
|
subject:
content: Please call me asap
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/601.
|
subject: FW: NG Delta 11-28-01
content: -----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]@ENRON
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 7:59 AM
To: [email protected]; Quigley, Dutch
Subject: NG Delta 11-28-01
(See attached file: NGDelta11-28.xls)
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le "message") sont etablis a l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires et sont confidentiels. Si vous recevez ce message par erreur, merci de le detruire et d'en avertir immediatement l'expediteur.
Toute utilisation de ce message non conforme a sa destination, toute diffusion ou toute publication, totale ou partielle, est interdite, sauf autorisation expresse.
L'internet ne permettant pas d'assurer l'integrite de ce message, BNP PARIBAS (et ses filiales) decline(nt) toute responsabilite au titre de ce message, dans l'hypothese ou il aurait ete modifie.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message and any attachments (the "message") are intended solely for the addressees and are confidential. If you receive this message in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender.
Any use not in accord with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited except formal approval.
The internet can not guarantee the integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not therefore be liable for the message if modified.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
- NGDelta11-28.xls
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/602.
|
subject: RE: Trade Confirmation
content: The Jan is confirmed.
The Cal 2 is not yet.
-----Original Message-----
From: Brad Schaeffer <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 9:49 AM
To: Arnold, John
Subject: Trade Confirmation
John,
Four trades to confirm.
Enron sells 625 F01 swaps @ 2.69 to Oneok
Enron buys 625 F01 swaps @ 2.69 from PGE
Enron sells 150/mo Cal02 swap 2.89 to BOA
Enron buys 150/mo Cal02 swap 2.89 from Calpine.
Thank you,
Brad.
Remember: Prebon party next Thurs. Mercury room.
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/603.
|
subject: RE: Bo Collins
content: The main number at the exchange is
212-299-2000
-----Original Message-----
From: Burns, Jennifer
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 10:28 AM
To: Arnold, John
Subject: Bo Collins
John-
Jeff needs Bo Collins' contact info. at the NYMEX.
Thanks,
jennifer
Jennifer Burns
Executive Assistant to Jeff Shankman
Enron Global Markets, LLC
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/604.
|
subject: RE:
content: Although I love you, that's not appropriate for any 3 way sleeves. EFS should be billed normally.
-----Original Message-----
From: "Zerilli, Frank" <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 2:28 PM
To: Arnold, John
Subject:
Along the lines of our conversation a few weeks back...we don't want to take advantage of the situation Enron is in. By default you were billed on the sell side of each transaction. If that is not appropriate please let me know and we will zero out the commission.
Yourlonely Brokers,
Frank & Rick
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/605.
|
subject: RE: time
content: yea. Give me your cell and home numbers.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ligums, Jeb
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 7:13 AM
To: Arnold, John
Subject: time
John,
I am sure that you are incredibly busy at this time. If you have a few minutes over the next few days I would like to speak with you briefly. I live downtown so any time and place is fine. Please let me know when there is a good time.
Sincerely,
Jeb
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/606.
|
subject: RE: Enron open otc nymex swaps PGE.xls
content: try to net woth bank of america the cal 4,5
-----Original Message-----
From: "Block, Ira" <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 9:12 AM
To: Arnold, John
Subject: Enron open otc nymex swaps PGE.xls
<<Enron open otc nymex swaps PGE.xls>> Thanks... Ira
PG&E National Energy Group and any other
company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or
logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, the regulated California utility. Neither
PG&E National Energy Group nor these other
referenced companies are regulated by the California Public
Utilities Commission. Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
do not have to buy products from these companies in order
to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.
- Enron open otc nymex swaps PGE.xls << File: Enron open otc nymex swaps PGE.xls >>
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/607.
|
subject: FW: BNP request
content: -----Original Message-----
From: "Zerilli, Frank" <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 8:31 AM
To: Arnold, John
Subject: BNP request
EFS Transaction
BNP Paribas wants to....
Cal02
Buy 20 May02 swaps
Buy 136 Jun02 swaps
Buy 143 jul02 swaps
Buy 145 aug02 swaps
Buy 124 sep02 swaps
Buy 131 oct02 swaps
Buy 89 nov02 swaps
Buy 94 dec02 swaps
Cal03
Sell 143 Jan03 swaps
Sell 35 feb03 swaps
Sell 142 mar03 swaps
Sell 44 apr03 swaps
Sell 44 may03 swaps
Sell 44 jun03 swaps
Sell 44 jul03 swaps
Sell 44 aug03 swaps
Sell 44 sep03 swaps
Sell 44 oct03 swaps
Sell 99 nov03 swaps
Sell 100 dec03 swaps
I have to do all of the cal2 and cal3 pieces or it's a no go...cantdo parts
Cal04
Sell 20 jan04 swaps
Sell 19 feb04 swaps
Sell 20 mar04 swaps
The cal 04 stuff is good to go...no strings attached
BNP would do the opposite to the futures.
Thanks
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/608.
|
subject: RE: AND ONE MORE....GLOBAL NEEDS TO SELL 50/MTH APR-OCT 02 NG SW
content: find out who they deal with and I'll try to find a counterparty that has the other side
-----Original Message-----
From: "CAROLINE ABRAMO, ENRON CORP." <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 9:27 AM
To: Arnold, John
Subject: AND ONE MORE....GLOBAL NEEDS TO SELL 50/MTH APR-OCT 02 NG SW
AND ONE MORE....GLOBAL NEEDS TO SELL 50/MTH APR-OCT 02 NG SWAPS.
THEY ARE WONDERING IF:
A) IF WE KNOW WHO WE ORIGINALLY OFFSET THEIR TRADES WITH- COULD
THEY CALL THEM DIRECT AND WE WILL "REASSIGN" THE TRADE. SO NO NE
T CHANGE TO YOUR CURRENT POSTION.
B) IF WE ARE GOING TO IMMEDIATELY OFFSET TODAYS TRADES WITH SOME
ONE, COULD THEY CONFERENCE ALL OF US TO AGREE ON A PRICE FOR THE
M TO TRADE WITH BOTH CPTYS.
C) IF THEIR TRADES TODAY NATURALLY HELP OUR BOOK, THEY WILL TRY
TO CALL SOMEONE TO TAKE THE OTHER SIDE AND THEY EAT BID/OFFER.
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/609.
|
subject: RE: LIST OF NG TRADES OUR CUSTYS WOULD LIKE TO DO TO UNWIND THE
content: customers may buy options from us.
-----Original Message-----
From: "CAROLINE ABRAMO, ENRON CORP." <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 9:26 AM
To: Arnold, John
Subject: LIST OF NG TRADES OUR CUSTYS WOULD LIKE TO DO TO UNWIND THE
LIST OF NG TRADES OUR CUSTYS WOULD LIKE TO DO TO UNWIND THEIR P
OSITONS WITH US:
GLOBAL
+ 500 NGH2 (PENULTIMATE SETTLE) SWAPS
+ 5/DAY TRANSCO Z6 JAN BASIS SWAPS
TUDOR
+ 100 JAN 3.40 CALLS
-50 NGF2 (LDS) SWAPS
+ 25 AUG 4.75 CALLS
- LET US KNOW IF ANY OF THESE CAN BE DONE TODAY, PLS.
TX ROBYN 212 715 2388
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/61.
|
subject: Re: <<Concur Expense Document>> - Quigley050401
content: this is my idea of vacation...
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/610.
|
subject: RE: AND ONE MORE....GLOBAL NEEDS TO SELL 50/MTH APR-OCT 02
content: i can probably find an offset
-----Original Message-----
From: "CAROLINE ABRAMO, ENRON CORP." <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 9:39 AM
To: Arnold, John
Subject: RE: AND ONE MORE....GLOBAL NEEDS TO SELL 50/MTH APR-OCT 02
SO YOU ARE WILLING TO SEARCH AROUND FOR THE OFFSET? OK - TALKING TO THEM..AND TH
IS IS FOR ALL GLOBAL TRADES? OR JUST THE NYMEX SWAPS?
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/611.
|
subject: RE: AND ONE MORE....GLOBAL NEEDS TO SELL 50/MTH APR-OCT 02
content: call me when you want a live quote
-----Original Message-----
From: "CAROLINE ABRAMO, ENRON CORP." <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 10:02 AM
To: Arnold, John
Subject: RE: AND ONE MORE....GLOBAL NEEDS TO SELL 50/MTH APR-OCT 02
OK TX
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/612.
|
subject: FW: TRADE RECAP#2 (bnpEFS)
content: -----Original Message-----
From: "Zerilli, Frank" <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 10:15 AM
To: Arnold, John
Subject: TRADE RECAP#2 (bnpEFS)
EFS TRANSACTION
ENRON SELLS 102 JUN02 LD SWAPS $3.120
ENRON SELLS 143 JUL02 LD SWAPS $3.160
ENRON SELLS 144 AUG02 LD SWAPS $3.195
ENRON SELLS 124 SEP02 LD SWAPS $3.195
ENRON SELLS 131 OCT02 LD SWAPS $3.230
ENRON SELLS 89 NOV02 LD SWAPS $3.375
ENRON SELLS 93 DEC02 LD SWAPS $3.514
COUNTERPARTY IS BNP PARIBAS...SMITH BARNEY
ENRON IS BUYING FUTURES ON THE EFS
ENRON BUYS 143 JAN03 LD SWAPS $3.390
ENRON BUYS 35 FEB03 LD SWAPS $3.320
ENRON BUYS 142 MAR03LD SWAPS $3.225
ENRON BUYS 44 APR03 LD SWAPS $3.090
ENRON BUYS 44 MAY03LD SWAPS $3.090
ENRON BUYS 44 JUN03 LD SWAPS $3.120
ENRON BUYS 44 JUL03 LD SWAPS $3.160
ENRON BUYS 44 AUG03 LD SWAPS $3.195
ENRON BUYS 43 SEP03 LD SWAPS $3.195
ENRON BUYS 44 OCT03 LD SWAPS $3.230
ENRON BUYS 99 NOV03 LD SWAPS $3.375
ENRON BUSY 100 DEC03 LD SWAPS $3.514
COUNTERPARTY IS BNP PARIBAS...SMITH BARNEY
ENRON IS SELLING FUTURES ON THE EFS
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/613.
|
subject: FW: trade recap#3
content: please post this efs with smith barney
-----Original Message-----
From: "Zerilli, Frank" <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 10:32 AM
To: Arnold, John
Subject: trade recap#3
EFS TRANSACTION
ENRON BUYS 38 JAN03 LD SWAPS $3.390
ENRON BUYS 35 FEB03 LD SWAPS $3.320
ENRON BUYS 38 MAR03LD SWAPS $3.225
ENRON BUYS 7 APR03 LD SWAPS $3.090
ENRON BUYS 7 MAY03LD SWAPS $3.090
ENRON BUYS 7 JUN03 LD SWAPS $3.120
ENRON BUYS 7 JUL03 LD SWAPS $3.160
ENRON BUYS 7 AUG03 LD SWAPS $3.195
ENRON BUYS 7 SEP03 LD SWAPS $3.195
ENRON BUYS 7 OCT03 LD SWAPS $3.230
ENRON BUYS 7 NOV03 LD SWAPS $3.375
ENRON BUYS 7 DEC03 LD SWAPS $3.514
COUNTERPARTY IS BARCLAYS BANK...THEY ARE POSTING WITH ALX..BROKER BADGE RESI
ENRON IS SELLING FUTURES ON THE EFS
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/614.
|
subject: FW: TRADE RECAP #6
content: -----Original Message-----
From: "Zerilli, Frank" <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 12:19 PM
To: Arnold, John
Subject: TRADE RECAP #6
EFS TRANSACTION
ENRON SELLS22 APR 02 LD Swaps
ENRON SELLS8 May 02 LD Swaps
ENRON SELLS18 Jun 02 LD Swaps
ENRON SELLS47 Jul 02 LD Swaps
ENRON SELLS32 Nov 02 LD Swaps
ENRON SELLS35 Dec 02 LD Swaps
COUNTERPARTY IS OEMI and they are posting with refco
ENRON IS BUYING FUTURES
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/615.
|
subject: FW: TRADE RECAP #5
content: I don't know if I gave this to you yet.
-----Original Message-----
From: "Zerilli, Frank" <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 12:06 PM
To: Arnold, John
Subject: TRADE RECAP #5
EFS Transaction
CAL02
ENRON SELLS62 MAY02SWAPS
ENRON SELLS68 JUL02 SWAPS
ENRON SELLS167 OCT02 SWAPS
ENRON SELLS92 NOV02 SWAPS
ENRON SELLS67 DEC02 SWAPS
COUNTERPARTY IS CINERGY...USING RAFFERTY TO POST
ENRON IS BUYING FUTURES POSTING PRICE IS 11/30/01SETTLEMENT
CAL03
ENRON BUYS 57 JAN03 SWAPS
ENRON BUYS 2 FEB03 SWAPS
ENRON BUYS 7 MAR03SWAPS
ENRON BUYS 26 APR03 SWAPS
ENRON BUYS 27 MAY03SWAPS
ENRON BUYS 71 JUN03 SWAPS
ENRON BUYS 93 JUL03 SWAPS
ENRON BUYS 93 AUG03 SWAPS
ENRON BUYS 46 SEP03 SWAPS
ENRON BUYS 27 OCT03 SWAPS
ENRON BUYS 26 NOV03 SWAPS
ENRON BUYS 27 DEC03 SWAPS
COUNTERPARTY IS CINERGY...USING RAFFERTY TO POST
ENRON IS SELLING FUTURES POSTING PRICE IS 11/30/01 SETTLEMENT
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/616.
|
subject: FW: Nat Gas Pos for 11-30
content: -----Original Message-----
From: Quigley, Dutch
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 2:30 PM
To: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'
Cc: Arnold, John
Subject: Nat Gas Pos for 11-30
This file does not contain Options or the future crosses that were done today.
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/617.
|
subject: RE: 3:17pm
content: go ahead
-----Original Message-----
From: Ligums, Jeb
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 3:18 PM
To: Arnold, John
Subject: 3:17pm
John,
I was planning to go downstairs to work out shortly. Please let me know if you need me around for anything. -Jeb
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/618.
|
subject:
content: --------- Inline attachment follows ---------
From: </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=APEREZ>
To: Arnold, John </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Jarnold>, Parks, Joe </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Jparks>, Brawner, Sandra F. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Sbrawne>
CC: Bailey, Derek </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Dbailey>, Heaney, Gordon </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Gheaney>, Williams, Jaime </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Jwilli2>
Date: Monday, December 3, 2001 8:30:30 GMT
Subject:
--------- Inline attachment follows ---------
From: </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=APEREZ>
To: Arnold, John </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Jarnold>, Parks, Joe </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Jparks>
CC: Bailey, Derek </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Dbailey>, Heaney, Gordon </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Gheaney>, Williams, Jaime </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Jwilli2>
Date: Monday, December 3, 2001 8:29:24 GMT
Subject:
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/619.
|
subject: RE: How Goes It?
content: Things are okay. May be much better in a week or two. Can you email me an update of how the 3 hedge funds are doing. I may have another chunk of money to invest should you have any good opportunities lying around. Still mainly interested in alternative investments with you. Also, can you confirm my address. I have moved recently and dont know if you have the new one. 2000 Bagby #15403; Houston 77002.
-----Original Message-----
From: "Gapinski, Michael" <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 8:00 AM
To: Arnold, John
Subject: How Goes It?
John -
I just wanted to touch base and see how you're doing through all of this. I
expect that you're still gainfully employed, given your position within the
core energy trading business. Let me know if you need anything from us.
> Michael Gapinski
> Account Vice President
> UBS PaineWebber, Inc.
> Corporate Employee Financial Services
> 713-654-0365
> 800-553-3119 x365
> Fax: 713-427-7539
> Cell: 281-435-0295
[email protected]
<<Michael Gapinski (E-mail).vcf>>
******************************************************
Notice Regarding Entry of Orders and Instructions:
Please do not transmit orders and/or instructions
regarding your UBSPaineWebber account(s) by e-mail.
Orders and/or instructions transmitted by e-mail will
not be accepted by UBSPaineWebber and UBSPaineWebber
will not be responsible for carrying out such orders
and/or instructions.
Notice Regarding Privacy and Confidentiality:
UBSPaineWebber reserves the right to monitor and
review the content of all e-mail communications sent
and/or received by its employees.
- Michael Gapinski (E-mail).vcf << File: Michael Gapinski (E-mail).vcf >>
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/62.
|
subject: Re: Fimat (Soc Gen Line)
content: yes i will
From: Sarah Wesner/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/04/2001 09:50 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Joseph Deffner/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject: Fimat (Soc Gen Line)
John - I got a call from Warren Tashnek today. He is concerned about the usage of the Fimat line because the trading volume is not covering its costs. He wanted to know how to increase business with Enron. I referred him to you. As you know, he is so nice and not trying to start a fight with us but needs more trades to justify the cost of the line. Will you please address this with him?
Thanks, Sarah
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/620.
|
subject: FW: Terminating Trades
content: -----Original Message-----
From: Calger, Christopher F.
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 5:43 PM
To: St. Clair, Carol
Cc: Sacks, Edward; Arnold, John
Subject: RE: Terminating Trades
Ed Sacks has the list. With respect to CSFB, it sounds like we have a dispute. Trades, my understanding, can get "done" verbally and then confirmed. It sounds like we should pull the tapes. We should also think of whether the deal agreed to Friday is currently in or out of the money.
Ed, could you look into this?
-----Original Message-----
From: St. Clair, Carol
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 2:55 PM
To: Calger, Christopher F.
Cc: Rohauer, Tanya
Subject: Terminating Trades
Chris:
We need to come up with a list of trades that we terminated last Friday so that we can take them out of our books. Do you have that list? Also, I spoke with "Dutch" this morning because CSFB left me a message yesterday after we filed claiming that the Friday trade was not effective. I disagree even though a confirm has not been signed. How do you want to handle this?
Carol St. Clair
EB 4539
713-853-3989 (phone)
713-646-8537 (fax)
281-382-1943 (cell phone)
8774545506 (pager)
281-890-8862 (home fax)
[email protected]
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/621.
|
subject: FW: Terminating Trades
content: -----Original Message-----
From: St. Clair, Carol
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 3:24 PM
To: Calger, Christopher F.
Cc: Sacks, Edward; Arnold, John
Subject: RE: Terminating Trades
Chris:
Today we received a letter from them. How and when do you want to respond to this? Has anyone called them?
Carol St. Clair
EB 4539
713-853-3989 (phone)
713-646-8537 (fax)
281-382-1943 (cell phone)
8774545506 (pager)
281-890-8862 (home fax)
[email protected]
-----Original Message-----
From: Calger, Christopher F.
Sent: Monday, December 3, 2001 5:43 PM
To: St. Clair, Carol
Cc: Sacks, Edward; Arnold, John
Subject: RE: Terminating Trades
Ed Sacks has the list. With respect to CSFB, it sounds like we have a dispute. Trades, my understanding, can get "done" verbally and then confirmed. It sounds like we should pull the tapes. We should also think of whether the deal agreed to Friday is currently in or out of the money.
Ed, could you look into this?
-----Original Message-----
From: St. Clair, Carol
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 2:55 PM
To: Calger, Christopher F.
Cc: Rohauer, Tanya
Subject: Terminating Trades
Chris:
We need to come up with a list of trades that we terminated last Friday so that we can take them out of our books. Do you have that list? Also, I spoke with "Dutch" this morning because CSFB left me a message yesterday after we filed claiming that the Friday trade was not effective. I disagree even though a confirm has not been signed. How do you want to handle this?
Carol St. Clair
EB 4539
713-853-3989 (phone)
713-646-8537 (fax)
281-382-1943 (cell phone)
8774545506 (pager)
281-890-8862 (home fax)
[email protected]
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/622.
|
subject: RE: 12/5/01
content: Come talk to me sometime today before you leave.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ligums, Jeb
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 7:36 AM
To: Arnold, John
Subject: 12/5/01
I am planning to leave the office around noon today. Please let me know if you need me for anything. -Jeb
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/623.
|
subject: RE:
content: yep
-----Original Message-----
From: Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 2:45 PM
To: Arnold, John
Subject:
did you put that on my desk?
|
houston <[email protected]>
|
|
arnold-j/sent_items/624.
|
subject:
content: Mark:
I know you must be very busy right now. I do have a important favor to ask. I am worried about the reaction should the names and numbers of the trading retention pool be made public. If you get notice of if and when that is to happen, advanced warning would be very helpful. If I cannot be reached at the office, my cell phone number is 713-557-3330.
Thanks,
John
|
pr <[email protected]>
|
|
arnold-j/sent_items/625.
|
subject: RE: what is your phone number?
content: 713 557 3330
what are your plans?
-----Original Message-----
From: Jen Fraser <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 10:11 AM
To: Arnold, John
Subject: what is your phone number?
=====
Jen Fraser
713 294 9259
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
http://greetings.yahoo.com
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/626.
|
subject: RE:
content: yep.
-----Original Message-----
From: "Zerilli, Frank" <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 12:53 PM
To: Arnold, John
Subject:
Just wanted to confirm we are good for Tuesday dinner....
I fly in with Rick around 3pmand will be staying at the Four Seasons downtown...Lancasteris sold out.
Let me know if you have the time...and where and when you want to meet.
Email me back at [email protected] << File: mailto:[email protected] >> in case you respond after I leave today.
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/627.
|
subject: FW: Payment
content: -----Original Message-----
From: "Mark Sagel" <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 4:07 PM
To: John Arnold
Subject: Payment
John:
The recent check from Enron ($9,000) has been returned for nonpayment. Any suggestions/ideas as to how to rectify this? I'd appreciate any input you may have. Thanks,
Mark
Psytech
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/628.
|
subject:
content: what day is jen and paula's party?
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/629.
|
subject:
content: I would like to check availability for period of Dec 29-Jan 1 for 2 people. Please advise.
John
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/63.
|
subject: option candlesticks technical paper
content: ---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 05/04/2001 09:40 AM ---------------------------
[email protected] on 05/04/2001 09:31:27 AM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: option candlesticks technical paper
Several people have asked how to read the Carr Futures option candlestick
charts.
Attached is a research note discussing tracking and trading option
volatility.
(See attached file: Tracking and Trading Nat Gas Vols.pdf)
Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606 USA
Tel: 312-368-6149
Fax: 312-368-2281
[email protected]
http://www.carrfut.com
- Tracking and Trading Nat Gas Vols.pdf
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/630.
|
subject: RE:
content: 2000 bagby #15403
houston 77002
-----Original Message-----
From: "Wolkwitz, Rick" <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 9:06 AM
To: Arnold, John
Subject:
Hey, updating my Christmas card list.....what is your home address?
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/631.
|
subject: RE: keeping the lights on
content: Only took me 3 weeks to respond. That's pretty good for me. I think things started collapsing the day I got your original email. Obviously not an opportune time to come take the tour right now. Not so impressive when the building is 80% empty. If/when we get the operation started again, I'll bring you up for a tour.
-----Original Message-----
From: "Kelly Busch" <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 12:25 PM
To: Arnold, John
Subject: keeping the lights on
John-
Was lovely meeting you this weekend. Sorry I was...less then effusive by Sullivan's. It wasn't the company -- I assure you.
And what about this white elepha...trading floor? I want to get it while it lasts.
look forward to it
-Kelly
Kelly C. Busch
Market Analyst
Energy Argus
713 622 3996 [email protected] << File: mailto:[email protected] >>
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/632.
|
subject:
content: Still have new years open, right?
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/633.
|
subject: RE: Follow up: New Company - Online Trader Access (Stack Manager
content: -----Original Message-----
From: Sever, Stephanie
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 2:22 PM
To: Allen, Phillip K.; Neal, Scott; Arnold, John
Cc: Lees, Lisa; Denny, Jennifer
Subject: Follow up: New Company - Online Trader Access (Stack Manager & Website)
Importance: High
Please populate the attached worksheets(Stack & Website) for EAST, WEST & FINANCIAL Gas Trader Access and return to me once complete. Let me know if you have any questions.
<< File: US Gas Stack & Website for New Version 121401.xls >>
Thank you
Stephanie Sever x33465
-----Original Message-----
From: Sever, Stephanie
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 10:20 AM
To: Allen, Phillip K.; Arnold, John; Martin, Thomas A.; Neal, Scott; Shively, Hunter S.
Cc: Lees, Lisa; Denny, Jennifer
Subject: New Company - Online Trader Access (Stack Manager & Website)
Please populate the attached worksheets for Stack Manager & Website Access. I have added the Gas product types and a drop down for each user/product type to populate with READ, EXECUTE or NONE. For READ ONLY Website ID's, additional population is NOT necessary. Please add or remove names as necessary and return to me once complete. Let me know if you have any questions.
<< File: US Gas Stack & Website for New Version 121401.xls >>
Thank you,
Stephanie Sever
EnronOnline
713-853-3465
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/634.
|
subject: RE: Payment
content: Mark:
I looked into the payment. Unfortunately, there is nothing I can do. Everything has to get approved by lawyers and they can't pay a vendor arbitrarily. I'll keep working on it. Sorry.
What do you think of ng and cl here?
-----Original Message-----
From: "Mark Sagel" <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 4:07 PM
To: John Arnold
Subject: Payment
John:
The recent check from Enron ($9,000) has been returned for nonpayment. Any suggestions/ideas as to how to rectify this? I'd appreciate any input you may have. Thanks,
Mark
Psytech
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/635.
|
subject:
content: Sorry for the delay.
The big guys have been maharris,stuckey and barker.
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/636.
|
subject:
content: Kim Ward thinks you're a big dork
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/637.
|
subject:
content: http://www.maruba-spa.com/main.shtml
dec 29-Jan 1
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/638.
|
subject: FW: NYMEX Holiday Hours
content: -----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]@ENRON
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:13 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: NYMEX Holiday Hours
Friends:
The NYMEX will be open for a normal trading day today, closing at 2:30 p.m. EST.
The market
will remain closed Monday December 24 and Tuesday December 25. NYMEX ACCESS
will
reopen the evening of the 25th at 7:00 p.m. The Exchange will reopen Wednesday
morning the 26th
at 10:00 a.m. EST.
Happy Holidays!!
BNP PARIBAS Commodity Futures
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le "message") sont etablis a l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires et sont confidentiels. Si vous recevez ce message par erreur, merci de le detruire et d'en avertir immediatement l'expediteur.
Toute utilisation de ce message non conforme a sa destination, toute diffusion ou toute publication, totale ou partielle, est interdite, sauf autorisation expresse.
L'internet ne permettant pas d'assurer l'integrite de ce message, BNP PARIBAS (et ses filiales) decline(nt) toute responsabilite au titre de ce message, dans l'hypothese ou il aurait ete modifie.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message and any attachments (the "message") are intended solely for the addressees and are confidential. If you receive this message in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender.
Any use not in accord with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited except formal approval.
The internet can not guarantee the integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not therefore be liable for the message if modified.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/64.
|
subject: <<Concur Expense Document>> - Quigley050401
content: do you know what my user id and password are?
---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 05/04/2001 09:33 AM ---------------------------
[email protected] on 05/04/2001 10:37:18 AM
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: <<Concur Expense Document>> - Quigley050401
The following expense report is ready for approval:
Employee Name: Henry Quigley
Status last changed by: Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: Quigley050401
Report Total: $107.45
Amount Due Employee: $107.45
To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://xms.enron.com
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/65.
|
subject: Re:
content: i like that feeling...as long as someone doesnt punch you in the gut. i'm going to san antonio at lunch today to play soccer so i just took the day off. catching up on 2 weeks of email. i know how to relax don't i
From: Kim Ward/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/04/2001 09:34 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:
Every single muscle in my stomach is sore.
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/66.
|
subject: Re:
content: absolutely...though i'm not sure how you do it. call chris gaskill and he should be abl to help.
From: Kevin McGowan/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/04/2001 09:33 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:
John,
Could I get access to the gas message board?
KJM
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/67.
|
subject:
content: Jeff:
To explain the P&L of -349,000 :
We executed the trade when you gave the order (the delta anyway), first thing in the morning. The market rallied 8 cents from the morning, with the back rallying about 2.5 cents. On 904 PV contracts, curve shift was -226,000. The balance, $123,000, is almost exactly $.01 bid/mid, which I think is pretty fair considering the tenor of the deal and that it included price and vol. Cal 3 straddles, for instance, are $1.39 / $1.45.
Looking out for you bubbeh:
John
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/68.
|
subject: Re: No Cracks
content: almost forgot about you....
will take care of . we'll keep you guys together close to the traders.
From: Mike A Roberts 05/01/2001 09:48 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: No Cracks
Johnny,
Please don't let my group fall through the cracks!
We'd like to be as close to your desk in the new building as possible (8 seats)
unless you think we should focus on one of the geographical desks
- Mike
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/69.
|
subject: Re: Please respond
content: no
[email protected] on 05/01/2001 11:44:40 AM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Please respond
Carr is hosting an enymex presentation at our office in New York this
Monday, May 7th from 2-4 PM. We are double checking our head count to make
sure that we will be ready for the people attending the presentation.
If you would, please reply to this email with a yes or a no to indicate
your intentions of attending this enymex presentation.
Thank you.
Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606 USA
Tel: 312-368-6149
Fax: 312-368-2281
[email protected]
http://www.carrfut.com
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/7.
|
subject:
content: most bullish thing at this point is moving closer to everyone's
psychological $4 price target and that everybody and their dog is still
short. next sellers need to be from producer community. saw a little this
week with williams hedging the barrett transaction but wouldnt say thats
indicative of the rest of the e&p community. short covering rallies will
get more common here. velocity of move down has slowed significantly for
good (except maybe in bid week). my concern is if we go to $4 and people
want to cover some shorts, who's selling it to them? might feel a lot like
it did when we were trying to break $5.
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/70.
|
subject: option candlesticks as a hot link
content: ---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 05/01/2001 08:10 AM ---------------------------
[email protected] on 05/01/2001 07:51:18 AM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: option candlesticks as a hot link
The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete. Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein. Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author. As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates. ? 2001 Carr Futures
The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.
Option Candlesticks
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/candlesticks48.pdf
Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606 USA
Tel: 312-368-6149
Fax: 312-368-2281
[email protected]
http://www.carrfut.com
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/706.
|
subject: RE: NG deal in California
content: who wrote the market commentary are at the bottom of this and who wrote the rest?
-----Original Message-----
From: Abramo, Caroline
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 4:44 PM
To: Arnold, John; Maggi, Mike
Cc: Quigley, Dutch; Griffith, John; Zivic, Robyn
Subject: FW: NG deal in California
sorry not to send this earlier..
i checked out the dept water resources site.. (wwwowe.water.ca.gov).. nothing too illuminating except that their power costs have come down from over $300 in march to$45 this month but due to the nature the borrowing costs associated with the LT contracts, they will not be able to pass on much savings to consumers (gotta love that).
we were supposed to have received a copy of all their LT purchases in July. checking what happened there. we know that there were 54 contracts signed .. half linked to gas which covered 1/3 of cali's total needs (looks like for 10 years). some left open the possibility of the state procuring gas supplies for the plants.. dwr has signed 6 agreements w/ gas suppliers..pretty sure cali uses 25,000-45,000 MW per year which is about 70 contracts a day in gas terms. If they locked in 1/3.. it would be about 25/day.. the deal they just did was about 16/day for just cal02..probably waiting for curve to flatten further to do more..
they purchased another 500 MW in Aug - the 17th (all 10-12 years)..and to date it looks like they have not purchased anything (have been selling into the grid daily) but not liquidating any previously negotiated LT deals (LT is anything beyond 3 months).
it sounds like they are planning on buying more of their gas requirements.. Sempra (who has LT power contracts with DWR and gives them the ability to buy 80% of their gas) said DWR had not purchased any gas yet.
Pls note story on page 5 & 6 of todays gas daily...
mentions California Dept of Water looking to hedge gas purchases for long-term contracts.
over the past few days we have seen Major Inv. Bk Buying Cal 02 Nymex Calls and the same bank buying Cal 02 Socal basis calls - very good size
This, we believe, is a hedge for this DWR story. The article mentions that they were "looking at ways to expand its gas purchases".
The article does not mention, nor do we know, how far out they are looking to purchase.
Socal basis has moved on the back of this deal....
Last week:
Cal 02 = 9 cents Cal 03 = 20 cents
Today
Cal 02 = 18.5 cents Cal 03 = 22 cents....so the spread has moved from 11 cent contango to 3.5 cents.
<<102401.pdf>>
Other than the call buying we saw related to this deal, the rest of the flow we are seeing is : sellers of vol.
Last night settles:
Cal 02 vol 51.5% and Cal 03 vol 37.25% - and we are 1 % lower in Cal 02 since the open , and 0.5 % lower Cal 03.
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/707.
|
subject: RE:
content: Although tennessee was a very good time not long ago, it sure seems like a long time ago.
-----Original Message-----
From: Lavorato, John
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 3:48 PM
To: Arnold, John
Subject:
tenn+3 200
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/708.
|
subject: RE:
content: How are you with the following counterparties for this transaction: Coral, Duke, Dynegy, Reliant?
-----Original Message-----
From: "DeVeny, David" <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 5:23 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject:
John:
Bank of Montreal would like to take Enron up on the offer you made this
afternoon to help balance our short swap exposure with your organization and
replace it with a third party Enron may have offsetting transactions with.
Per our conversation, to offset the contracts that we are short to Enron,
our position would allow us to accommodate the following transactions:
Buying five and a half (5.5) contracts a day December 2001 (Z01) natural gas
last day swaps from Enron and selling to a third party
Buying sixteen and a half (16.5) contracts a day January 2002 through
December 2002 (F02-Z02) natural gas last day swaps from Enron and selling to
a third party
Buying four (4) contracts a day April 2003 through October 2003 (J03-V03)
natural gas last day swaps from Enron and selling to a third party
Buying two (2) contracts a day January 2004 through December 2008 (F04-Z08)
natural gas last day swaps from Enron and selling to a third party
If you find an appropriate offsetting positions please contact me at
212-605-1475.
Thank you,
David DeVeny
Bank of Montreal
Commodity Derivatives Group
<FONT SIZE = 1>****************************************************************************
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail and destroy any copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a person other than the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal. Unless otherwise stated, opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author and are not endorsed by the author's employer.</FONT>
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/709.
|
subject: RE: NG deal in California
content: not much from customers lately. Customers waiting for market to stabilize before doing any hedging
-----Original Message-----
From: Abramo, Caroline
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 6:43 AM
To: Arnold, John
Subject: RE: NG deal in California
morning.. i wrote the top and robyn bottom.. we sent the bottom part to the customer who brought the article to our attention.. I'd like to say i read the gas daily everyday but i miss it a lot..
there are a few things going on.. the client is long cy02/short cy03 socal.. and the deal last week impacts that position.. thats their interest.
our interest is whether or not there are more of these deals coming.. which i was trying to figure out.
what have you been seeing flow-wise lately?
-----Original Message-----
From: Arnold, John
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 7:34 AM
To: Abramo, Caroline
Subject: RE: NG deal in California
who wrote the market commentary are at the bottom of this and who wrote the rest?
-----Original Message-----
From: Abramo, Caroline
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 4:44 PM
To: Arnold, John; Maggi, Mike
Cc: Quigley, Dutch; Griffith, John; Zivic, Robyn
Subject: FW: NG deal in California
sorry not to send this earlier..
i checked out the dept water resources site.. (wwwowe.water.ca.gov).. nothing too illuminating except that their power costs have come down from over $300 in march to$45 this month but due to the nature the borrowing costs associated with the LT contracts, they will not be able to pass on much savings to consumers (gotta love that).
we were supposed to have received a copy of all their LT purchases in July. checking what happened there. we know that there were 54 contracts signed .. half linked to gas which covered 1/3 of cali's total needs (looks like for 10 years). some left open the possibility of the state procuring gas supplies for the plants.. dwr has signed 6 agreements w/ gas suppliers..pretty sure cali uses 25,000-45,000 MW per year which is about 70 contracts a day in gas terms. If they locked in 1/3.. it would be about 25/day.. the deal they just did was about 16/day for just cal02..probably waiting for curve to flatten further to do more..
they purchased another 500 MW in Aug - the 17th (all 10-12 years)..and to date it looks like they have not purchased anything (have been selling into the grid daily) but not liquidating any previously negotiated LT deals (LT is anything beyond 3 months).
it sounds like they are planning on buying more of their gas requirements.. Sempra (who has LT power contracts with DWR and gives them the ability to buy 80% of their gas) said DWR had not purchased any gas yet.
Pls note story on page 5 & 6 of todays gas daily...
mentions California Dept of Water looking to hedge gas purchases for long-term contracts.
over the past few days we have seen Major Inv. Bk Buying Cal 02 Nymex Calls and the same bank buying Cal 02 Socal basis calls - very good size
This, we believe, is a hedge for this DWR story. The article mentions that they were "looking at ways to expand its gas purchases".
The article does not mention, nor do we know, how far out they are looking to purchase.
Socal basis has moved on the back of this deal....
Last week:
Cal 02 = 9 cents Cal 03 = 20 cents
Today
Cal 02 = 18.5 cents Cal 03 = 22 cents....so the spread has moved from 11 cent contango to 3.5 cents.
<<102401.pdf>>
Other than the call buying we saw related to this deal, the rest of the flow we are seeing is : sellers of vol.
Last night settles:
Cal 02 vol 51.5% and Cal 03 vol 37.25% - and we are 1 % lower in Cal 02 since the open , and 0.5 % lower Cal 03.
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/71.
|
subject:
content: Stranger:
Any interest in getting a drink or dinner Tuesday? havent seen you in forever.
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/710.
|
subject: FW:
content: BMO wants to do this sleave trade. Duke, Dynegy, Coral, and Reliant have offsetting positions. Who's best for us to do this with? Also, what's our current balance with BMO? Should I demand for the trade to be offmarket?
-----Original Message-----
From: "DeVeny, David" <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 5:23 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject:
John:
Bank of Montreal would like to take Enron up on the offer you made this
afternoon to help balance our short swap exposure with your organization and
replace it with a third party Enron may have offsetting transactions with.
Per our conversation, to offset the contracts that we are short to Enron,
our position would allow us to accommodate the following transactions:
Buying five and a half (5.5) contracts a day December 2001 (Z01) natural gas
last day swaps from Enron and selling to a third party
Buying sixteen and a half (16.5) contracts a day January 2002 through
December 2002 (F02-Z02) natural gas last day swaps from Enron and selling to
a third party
Buying four (4) contracts a day April 2003 through October 2003 (J03-V03)
natural gas last day swaps from Enron and selling to a third party
Buying two (2) contracts a day January 2004 through December 2008 (F04-Z08)
natural gas last day swaps from Enron and selling to a third party
If you find an appropriate offsetting positions please contact me at
212-605-1475.
Thank you,
David DeVeny
Bank of Montreal
Commodity Derivatives Group
<FONT SIZE = 1>****************************************************************************
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail and destroy any copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a person other than the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal. Unless otherwise stated, opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author and are not endorsed by the author's employer.</FONT>
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/711.
|
subject:
content: can you have the back run a new position report as of yesterday and include j aron
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/712.
|
subject: RE:
content: he was contacted directly. Why, are you trying to find a good one?
-----Original Message-----
From: Slone, Jeanie
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 9:24 AM
To: Arnold, John
Subject:
Do you know who the headhunter was that called on Maggi to do the El Paso thing?
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/713.
|
subject: RE: NG deal in California
content: expect some producer selling if/when mrkt stabilizes.
what production data are you looking at?
-----Original Message-----
From: Abramo, Caroline
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 6:55 AM
To: Arnold, John
Subject: RE: NG deal in California
custy interest from sell side? or buy?
sounds like the producers are pretty hedged?
what do you think of the fact that production is disappointing?
that fact is keeping some from selling more (my guys).. but i argue that its already priced into the curve.. and economic outlook overwhelms..
??
-----Original Message-----
From: Arnold, John
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 7:51 AM
To: Abramo, Caroline
Subject: RE: NG deal in California
not much from customers lately. Customers waiting for market to stabilize before doing any hedging
-----Original Message-----
From: Abramo, Caroline
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 6:43 AM
To: Arnold, John
Subject: RE: NG deal in California
morning.. i wrote the top and robyn bottom.. we sent the bottom part to the customer who brought the article to our attention.. I'd like to say i read the gas daily everyday but i miss it a lot..
there are a few things going on.. the client is long cy02/short cy03 socal.. and the deal last week impacts that position.. thats their interest.
our interest is whether or not there are more of these deals coming.. which i was trying to figure out.
what have you been seeing flow-wise lately?
-----Original Message-----
From: Arnold, John
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 7:34 AM
To: Abramo, Caroline
Subject: RE: NG deal in California
who wrote the market commentary are at the bottom of this and who wrote the rest?
-----Original Message-----
From: Abramo, Caroline
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 4:44 PM
To: Arnold, John; Maggi, Mike
Cc: Quigley, Dutch; Griffith, John; Zivic, Robyn
Subject: FW: NG deal in California
sorry not to send this earlier..
i checked out the dept water resources site.. (wwwowe.water.ca.gov).. nothing too illuminating except that their power costs have come down from over $300 in march to$45 this month but due to the nature the borrowing costs associated with the LT contracts, they will not be able to pass on much savings to consumers (gotta love that).
we were supposed to have received a copy of all their LT purchases in July. checking what happened there. we know that there were 54 contracts signed .. half linked to gas which covered 1/3 of cali's total needs (looks like for 10 years). some left open the possibility of the state procuring gas supplies for the plants.. dwr has signed 6 agreements w/ gas suppliers..pretty sure cali uses 25,000-45,000 MW per year which is about 70 contracts a day in gas terms. If they locked in 1/3.. it would be about 25/day.. the deal they just did was about 16/day for just cal02..probably waiting for curve to flatten further to do more..
they purchased another 500 MW in Aug - the 17th (all 10-12 years)..and to date it looks like they have not purchased anything (have been selling into the grid daily) but not liquidating any previously negotiated LT deals (LT is anything beyond 3 months).
it sounds like they are planning on buying more of their gas requirements.. Sempra (who has LT power contracts with DWR and gives them the ability to buy 80% of their gas) said DWR had not purchased any gas yet.
Pls note story on page 5 & 6 of todays gas daily...
mentions California Dept of Water looking to hedge gas purchases for long-term contracts.
over the past few days we have seen Major Inv. Bk Buying Cal 02 Nymex Calls and the same bank buying Cal 02 Socal basis calls - very good size
This, we believe, is a hedge for this DWR story. The article mentions that they were "looking at ways to expand its gas purchases".
The article does not mention, nor do we know, how far out they are looking to purchase.
Socal basis has moved on the back of this deal....
Last week:
Cal 02 = 9 cents Cal 03 = 20 cents
Today
Cal 02 = 18.5 cents Cal 03 = 22 cents....so the spread has moved from 11 cent contango to 3.5 cents.
<<102401.pdf>>
Other than the call buying we saw related to this deal, the rest of the flow we are seeing is : sellers of vol.
Last night settles:
Cal 02 vol 51.5% and Cal 03 vol 37.25% - and we are 1 % lower in Cal 02 since the open , and 0.5 % lower Cal 03.
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/714.
|
subject: FW:
content: -----Original Message-----
From: "DeVeny, David" <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 7:48 AM
To: Arnold, John
Subject: RE:
All four are acceptable counterparties.
-----Original Message-----
From: John.Arnold [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 7:45 AM
To: DeVeny, David
Subject: RE:
How are you with the following counterparties for this transaction: Coral,
Duke, Dynegy, Reliant?
-----Original Message-----
From: "DeVeny, David" <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 5:23 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject:
John:
Bank of Montreal would like to take Enron up on the offer you made this
afternoon to help balance our short swap exposure with your organization
and
replace it with a third party Enron may have offsetting transactions
with.
Per our conversation, to offset the contracts that we are short to
Enron,
our position would allow us to accommodate the following transactions:
Buying five and a half (5.5) contracts a day December 2001 (Z01) natural
gas
last day swaps from Enron and selling to a third party
Buying sixteen and a half (16.5) contracts a day January 2002 through
December 2002 (F02-Z02) natural gas last day swaps from Enron and
selling to
a third party
Buying four (4) contracts a day April 2003 through October 2003
(J03-V03)
natural gas last day swaps from Enron and selling to a third party
Buying two (2) contracts a day January 2004 through December 2008
(F04-Z08)
natural gas last day swaps from Enron and selling to a third party
If you find an appropriate offsetting positions please contact me at
212-605-1475.
Thank you,
David DeVeny
Bank of Montreal
Commodity Derivatives Group
<FONT SIZE = 1>
****************************************************************************
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged
information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the
sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail and destroy any
copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a person other
than the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal. Unless
otherwise stated, opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the
author and are not endorsed by the author's employer.</FONT>
**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at [email protected] and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************
<FONT SIZE = 1>****************************************************************************
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail and destroy any copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a person other than the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal. Unless otherwise stated, opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author and are not endorsed by the author's employer.</FONT>
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/715.
|
subject: RE:
content: Understand. Are you good with Bank of Montreal out that far?
-----Original Message-----
From: "Lengkeek Jr, Steve C" <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 10:57 AM
To: Arnold, John
Subject:
John,
I would like to swap out some cal 04 with you. We are long 2 a day with you
out there. We are under new parameters here. So this will allow us to
continue to trade with you.
Thanks,
Steve
302-452-6930
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/716.
|
subject: RE:
content: how about j aron?
-----Original Message-----
From: "Lengkeek Jr, Steve C" <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 1:50 PM
To: Arnold, John
Subject: RE:
They don't us so that won't work.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 1:06 PM
To: Lengkeek Jr, Steve C
Subject: RE:
Understand. Are you good with Bank of Montreal out that far?
-----Original Message-----
From: "Lengkeek Jr, Steve C" <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 10:57 AM
To: Arnold, John
Subject:
John,
I would like to swap out some cal 04 with you. We are long 2 a day with
you
out there. We are under new parameters here. So this will allow us to
continue to trade with you.
Thanks,
Steve
302-452-6930
**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at [email protected] and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/717.
|
subject: FW: (01-365) EXCHANGE ANNOUNCES PLANS TO INTRODUCE OVER-THE-COUNTER
content: -----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]@ENRON
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 4:19 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: (01-365) EXCHANGE ANNOUNCES PLANS TO INTRODUCE OVER-THE-COUNTER C LEARING
Notice No. 01-365
October 30, 2001
TO:
All Exchange Members / Member Firms
All Clearing Members
FROM:
J. Robert Collins, Jr., President
RE:
EXCHANGE ANNOUNCES PLANS TO INTRODUCE OVER-THE-COUNTER CLEARING
EXCHANGE ANNOUNCES PLANS TO INTRODUCE OVER-THE-COUNTER CLEARING
The board of directors of the New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc., last
night
approved a series of measures to offer credit intermediation through
clearing services and trading tools for the over-the-counter (OTC) natural
gas market.
This plan will include the introduction of exchange of futures for swap
(EFS) transactions and large order execution to the natural gas futures
market within the next few weeks, along with the previously announced
electronic trading of cleared natural gas swaps and basis contracts.
Recent events in the natural gas market have served to reinforce the
necessity of counterparty credit risk management and have accelerated the
Exchange's plans to introduce a full array of risk management tools under
the umbrella of our clearinghouse. Combining these trading vehicles with
our Henry Hub futures contract will offer market participants the
advantages
of these instruments in conjunction with one of the most liquid commodity
markets in the world and provide greater stability to the market as a
whole.
The Exchange is in a unique leadership position to offer these services
with
natural gas futures and options volume in 2000 reaching the equivalent of
approximately 230 trillion cubic feet and the notional value of last year's
transactions Exchange-wide totaling $3 trillion, or $14 billion per day.
One half billion dollars is available to participants on each of the
Exchange divisions through each guarantee fund and the respective clearing
members.
EFS transactions will work similarly to exchange of futures for physical
(EFP) transactions. Two parties will be allowed to privately negotiate the
execution of an integrated over-the-counter swaps and related futures
transaction on pricing terms agreed upon by the involved parties. The
transaction must involve approximately equal but opposite side-of-market
quantities of futures and swap exposures in the same or related commodities
and will be permitted until two hours after trading terminates in the
underlying futures contract. EFS transactions will be permitted to
liquidate, initiate, and transfer futures market positions between the two
parties involved in the transaction.
The clearing member representing each party will be responsible to notify
the Exchange of the amount and type of futures contracts involved, the
price
at which the futures transaction should be cleared, and the identity of the
parties involved.
The Exchange will also begin permitting traders to execute block trades of
250 natural gas futures contracts or more in the first two nearby months at
the best bid or offer for that size. These trades will not be permitted
during the closing range.
Early next year, the Exchange will introduce a cleared Henry Hub natural
gas
swaps contract, providing the marketplace with direct clearing on the most
popular energy swaps contract over the last several year. As part of this
move, the Exchange will clear OTC-executed transactions through its EFS
mechanism.
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/718.
|
subject: RE: X pits to Fimat
content: Tell them to calm down. I'm going to start clearing amro, tfs, and carr trades through them as well. I will do a new xpit to offset some of the new positions that will lower the margin in the short term.
-----Original Message-----
From: Wesner-Soong, Sarah
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 2:29 PM
To: Arnold, John
Cc: Warwick, Todd
Subject: X pits to Fimat
John - a lot of trades other than energy trades were xpitted to Fimat on Friday from ABN. Fimat NY is now upset and wants to restrict our trading with Fimat from 20 million to 11 million. Do you know who asked for this xpitting to be done? Sarah
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/719.
|
subject: RE: Refco Update
content: Are we proposing to pay refco for order flow, like a tick per trade, or are we going to give them our prices and then they widen them to add their juice?
-----Original Message-----
From: Cummings, John
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 2:06 PM
To: Arnold, John; Nowlan Jr., John L.; White, Bill; Goughary, Jim; Wilson, John L.
Cc: Shults, Bob; Eichmann, Marc; Richter, Brad; Palmer, Mark S. (ENW)
Subject: Refco Update
Gentlemen
We met last week with their management and CTO. We have determined the hardware and software requirements for the deal. We are in the process of drawing up a term sheet and proposing a financial structure. We have set a meeting for Nov 12 in NYC to get into the details of financial terms and structure.
The deal is going well and we are working with the following hi-level parameters:
Initially 8 Nymex look-a-like-products: Natural Gas (prompt, prompt+1, prompt+2), WTI (prompt), Gasoline (prompt, prompt+1), Heating Oil (prompt, prompt+1)
2 customer buckets with different spreads and volumes: Institutional and Retail
Volumes for Institutional will be 1 contract moving towards 0.5 contract and 0.2 contract possibly to match Nymex mini concept, Volumes for retail will be 0.5 contracts moving to 0.2 contract to match Nymex mini concept
Data feed with price and volumes sent from EnronOnline to Refco system customized and powered by EnronOnline software
Initially target scope is designed for a capacity of 5000 customers, 500 simultaneous
Refco will take credit risk for their customers and post daily collateral with Enron
Refco will pay Enron a one-time license fee for a 3 year contract with an additional annual maintenance & support fee
Enron will keep all additional margin generated by the transactions and Refco will keep the commissions generated and float from additional margin held.
Obviously, the above parameters are the preliminary thoughts and subject to change and negotiation. We are just beginning to model the potential revenue and cost streams and there will likely be some adjustments that will come out of this exercise. There are also a number of alternative technology scenarios to pursue if we have more or less money to work with.
Please feel free to call me x36413 if you have any questions or comments.
Regards
John Cummings
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/72.
|
subject: RE: Your note
content: my email as far as i know is [email protected]. not on msn though.
i made space for your 8 people as well as ferries, roberts, and the other person (??) you requested. Come down tomorrow and i'll show you the layout again.
john
From: Jean Mrha/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/30/2001 08:34 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: Your note
Arnold,
I am trying to talk via MSN messenger service and it will not accept [email protected] or any other reasonable email path. What is your official email path? I am assuming that you are using Outlook. I am here at work trying to close a deal.
I will forward your message to Grass, but I want to visually see the layout of the floor. I will end up having spots on five and six. Also, Nelson Ferries' and Linda Roberts' location are very important to the Wellhead/Ecommerce effort. And yes, John will need room to grow.
What did you think of the article?
Mrha
-----Original Message-----
From: Arnold, John
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 8:23 PM
To: Mrha, Jean
Subject:
Jean:
I think the location i talked about before is actually better for you. The area towards the edge of the building borders the northeast gas group, long-term originators, and mid-market orig group. not exactly who you need to be around. the location in the center is much closer to the east gulf group, specifically sandra, and the same distance to the central and texas trading groups. most importantly, it provides room for both your group and the trading group to expand. call me if you want to talk further....
thanks for the article.
john
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/720.
|
subject: RE: Bank of Montreal
content: Talk to Geoff Storey. He is handling a transaction that will reduce the majority of exposure to us Wednesday morning.
-----Original Message-----
From: Boots, Kelly H.
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 8:42 PM
To: Kitchen, Louise; Arnold, John
Subject: Bank of Montreal
Louise,
I spoke to our contact at BMO and they confirmed the $11.25MM is due to us by the end of day Wed. Also mentioned they were awaiting to have off-setting discussions with John Arnold. Let me know if I need to put another call into them Wed.
Kelly
#31603
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/721.
|
subject:
content: Jeff:
If you talk to Greg Trentham, will you ask him to call me? I have not had a chance to talk to him yet.
Thanks,
John
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/722.
|
subject:
content: Does my boy Marc Findsen have a chance?
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/723.
|
subject: RE: San Antonio Management Conference
content: Can you get me an itinary of events?
-----Original Message-----
From: Rangel, Ina
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 5:07 PM
To: Arnold, John
Subject: San Antonio Management Conference
John:
Do you want me to sign you up for Management Conference? It is Nov. 14-16. It has not been cancelled yet.
-Ina
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/724.
|
subject:
content: banc one
brooke hamilton
312 732 7380
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/725.
|
subject: RE:
content: how about monday after work? or monday lunch if we're all fired by then...
-----Original Message-----
From: Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 7:17 AM
To: Arnold, John
Subject: RE:
I haven't called him, but will try to this week. It's a little low on the priority list. When do you want to grab a drink?
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Arnold, John
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 6:38 AM
To: Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Subject:
Jeff:
If you talk to Greg Trentham, will you ask him to call me? I have not had a chance to talk to him yet.
Thanks,
John
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/726.
|
subject: RE: San Antonio Management Conference
content: sign me up
-----Original Message-----
From: Rangel, Ina
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 5:07 PM
To: Arnold, John
Subject: San Antonio Management Conference
John:
Do you want me to sign you up for Management Conference? It is Nov. 14-16. It has not been cancelled yet.
-Ina
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/727.
|
subject: RE: do you wish to add another name for todays interviews
content: I'll have an answer by 9:30
-----Original Message-----
From: Buckley, Karen
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 8:35 AM
To: Arnold, John
Subject: do you wish to add another name for todays interviews
Hi John,
Let me know the name this am (f you want to add him/her), so I can re-adjust the schedule. Will also need to get a resume from the individual.
Thanks,
Karen.
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/728.
|
subject: FW: Trading Track Interviews
content: Please stick him on
-----Original Message-----
From: Zimmerman, Grant
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 9:11 AM
To: Arnold, John
Subject: Trading Track Interviews
John
Please put me on the trading track interview schedule for this afternoon. Attached is my resume. Thank you for the opportunity.
Regards,
Grant
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/729.
|
subject: FW: Cal04
content: -----Original Message-----
From: "Hoese, Brad" <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 8:54 AM
To: Arnold, John
Subject: Cal04
John:
We need to sell you 2/day Cal04 and buy it from another counterparty. Sorry
about the confusion.
Brad
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/73.
|
subject: Advisory invoice
content: can you take care of this...
---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 04/30/2001 08:26 PM ---------------------------
"Mark Sagel" <[email protected]> on 04/27/2001 10:14:42 AM
To: "John Arnold" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Advisory invoice
John:
Attached is the invoice covering the current period.
Hope all is well. No changes on analysis. Market will have occasional rallies (not significant) but all evidence shows lower levels to be seen. Most bearish case shows decline until late May or first two weeks of June. Prices from 420 - 380.
- invoice enron 9943.doc
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/730.
|
subject: RE:
content: 4:30ish??
-----Original Message-----
From: Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 8:11 AM
To: Arnold, John
Subject: RE:
when?
-----Original Message-----
From: Arnold, John
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 11:51 PM
To: Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Subject: RE:
yes
-----Original Message-----
From: Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Sent: Thu 11/1/2001 4:57 PM
To: Arnold, John
Cc:
Subject:
are we going to work out with Dean tomarrow?
|
houston <[email protected]>
|
|
arnold-j/sent_items/731.
|
subject: RE: Credit from brokers
content: Understand. Enron has been Man's biggest account for years and during that=
time we have paid them a lot in commissions. They approached us on Wednes=
day to try to increase the margin required, even though we were below the c=
redit threshold that had been established in the contracts written 5+ years=
ago. I refused to agree to change the margin calculations. It became cle=
ar that Man was uncomfortable with the exposure to such a big account given=
that Man is a relatively small shop. I agreed to xpit some positions such=
that they would get more comfortable with the outstanding risk in the acco=
unt. At the same time I told them I was transacting business as usual and =
if they couldnt handle/didnt want the clearing business I would clear someb=
ody else but that was a permanent decision for them to make. Clear our bus=
iness always, or clear it never. Paribas has stuck with us throughout and =
I intend to clear the majority of future biz with Paribas. I agreed during=
hours of phone calls wednesday that we would xpit specific futures positio=
ns on thursday, which we did, but the rest of the position would stay there=
. They agreed. We specifically stated the rest of the positions and the o=
ptions would stay and we would work out those positions over time. &!@$ th=
em if they are trying to go back on that. =20
-----Original Message-----
From: =09Wesner-Soong, Sarah =20
Sent:=09Friday, November 02, 2001 8:42 AM
To:=09Arnold, John; Quigley, Dutch
Subject:=09Credit from brokers
ENE is in a severe liquidity crisis. Even if EDF makes mistakes we have to=
be careful how we treat them because Enron's cash position is very precari=
ous. It's good to insist that EDF give us what's owed especially since the=
y seem to be wrong in this case but as far as lines of credit go, ENE is in=
a much worse position than ever before. =20
I am going to get a guarantee to Fimat today from Enron Corp with respect t=
o ENA trades. We have never had to do this before but if I do not get it F=
imat will keep their trade line at $11 million. Soc Gen (extends credit un=
der Fimat line) is being a big pain but having spoken to our bank people we=
have no choice but to be grateful we are getting credit these days. =20
Please keep this bad cash/credit situation confidential.
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/732.
|
subject: RE: Positions
content: Will you wire the money immediately when this is done?
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]@ENRON
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 10:10 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Wesner-Soong, Sarah; Deffner, Joseph
Subject: Positions
Dear John
In place of the original transfer of options that we sent you yesterday, I
propose the following transfer instead. You will note that it includes no
options at all.
short 1660 May 2002 futures
Please understand that this entire affair is making me as uncomfortable as
it is clearly making you.
Kind regards
Kevin R Davis
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/733.
|
subject: FW: Positions
content: fyi
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]@ENRON
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 10:10 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Wesner-Soong, Sarah; Deffner, Joseph
Subject: Positions
Dear John
In place of the original transfer of options that we sent you yesterday, I
propose the following transfer instead. You will note that it includes no
options at all.
short 1660 May 2002 futures
Please understand that this entire affair is making me as uncomfortable as
it is clearly making you.
Kind regards
Kevin R Davis
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/734.
|
subject: RE: Positions
content: yes, I replied and asked mike if he'd wire the money today if I agreeed. waiting on his response.
-----Original Message-----
From: Wesner-Soong, Sarah
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 10:49 AM
To: Arnold, John
Subject: RE: Positions
Does this work for your desk?
-----Original Message-----
From: Arnold, John
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 10:44 AM
To: Wesner-Soong, Sarah
Subject: FW: Positions
fyi
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]@ENRON
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 10:10 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Wesner-Soong, Sarah; Deffner, Joseph
Subject: Positions
Dear John
In place of the original transfer of options that we sent you yesterday, I
propose the following transfer instead. You will note that it includes no
options at all.
short 1660 May 2002 futures
Please understand that this entire affair is making me as uncomfortable as
it is clearly making you.
Kind regards
Kevin R Davis
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/735.
|
subject: FW: Positions
content: -----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]@ENRON
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 10:48 AM
To: Arnold, John
Subject: RE: Positions
The answer would be yes if it were the only ex-pit instructions we received
today.
Given that you have instructed us already to ex-pit the 926 August 03
position, we would only want you to transfer 734 of the May 02 futures.
If you only do the 1660 May 02 or, if you do the 926 august 03 and 734 May
02 then YES, we will wire the money immediately after one or other of those
expits are achieved.
Kevin
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 4:43 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Positions
Will you wire the money immediately when this is done?
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]@ENRON
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 10:10 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Wesner-Soong, Sarah; Deffner, Joseph
Subject: Positions
Dear John
In place of the original transfer of options that we sent you yesterday,
I
propose the following transfer instead. You will note that it includes
no
options at all.
short 1660 May 2002 futures
Please understand that this entire affair is making me as uncomfortable
as
it is clearly making you.
Kind regards
Kevin R Davis
**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at [email protected] and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/736.
|
subject: FW: Positions
content: -----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]@ENRON
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 10:54 AM
To: Arnold, John
Subject: RE: Positions
John
The simplest thing would be to disregard the 926 Aug'03 instructions and to
do the 1660 May 02 only....
Your call
Kevin
-----Original Message-----
From: Davis, Kevin (LDN Int)
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 4:48 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: RE: Positions
The answer would be yes if it were the only ex-pit instructions we received
today.
Given that you have instructed us already to ex-pit the 926 August 03
position, we would only want you to transfer 734 of the May 02 futures.
If you only do the 1660 May 02 or, if you do the 926 august 03 and 734 May
02 then YES, we will wire the money immediately after one or other of those
expits are achieved.
Kevin
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 4:43 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Positions
Will you wire the money immediately when this is done?
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]@ENRON
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 10:10 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Wesner-Soong, Sarah; Deffner, Joseph
Subject: Positions
Dear John
In place of the original transfer of options that we sent you yesterday,
I
propose the following transfer instead. You will note that it includes
no
options at all.
short 1660 May 2002 futures
Please understand that this entire affair is making me as uncomfortable
as
it is clearly making you.
Kind regards
Kevin R Davis
**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at [email protected] and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/737.
|
subject: RE: Positions
content: we have already done the aug 03, how many may 02 do you want us to do?
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]@ENRON
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 10:54 AM
To: Arnold, John
Subject: RE: Positions
John
The simplest thing would be to disregard the 926 Aug'03 instructions and to
do the 1660 May 02 only....
Your call
Kevin
-----Original Message-----
From: Davis, Kevin (LDN Int)
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 4:48 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: RE: Positions
The answer would be yes if it were the only ex-pit instructions we received
today.
Given that you have instructed us already to ex-pit the 926 August 03
position, we would only want you to transfer 734 of the May 02 futures.
If you only do the 1660 May 02 or, if you do the 926 august 03 and 734 May
02 then YES, we will wire the money immediately after one or other of those
expits are achieved.
Kevin
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 4:43 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Positions
Will you wire the money immediately when this is done?
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]@ENRON
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 10:10 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Wesner-Soong, Sarah; Deffner, Joseph
Subject: Positions
Dear John
In place of the original transfer of options that we sent you yesterday,
I
propose the following transfer instead. You will note that it includes
no
options at all.
short 1660 May 2002 futures
Please understand that this entire affair is making me as uncomfortable
as
it is clearly making you.
Kind regards
Kevin R Davis
**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at [email protected] and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/738.
|
subject: FW: Positions
content: -----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]@ENRON
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 11:06 AM
To: Arnold, John
Subject: RE: Positions
734 and we're done
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 5:09 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Positions
we have already done the aug 03, how many may 02 do you want us to do?
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]@ENRON
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 10:54 AM
To: Arnold, John
Subject: RE: Positions
John
The simplest thing would be to disregard the 926 Aug'03 instructions and
to
do the 1660 May 02 only....
Your call
Kevin
-----Original Message-----
From: Davis, Kevin (LDN Int)
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 4:48 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: RE: Positions
The answer would be yes if it were the only ex-pit instructions we
received
today.
Given that you have instructed us already to ex-pit the 926 August 03
position, we would only want you to transfer 734 of the May 02 futures.
If you only do the 1660 May 02 or, if you do the 926 august 03 and 734
May
02 then YES, we will wire the money immediately after one or other of
those
expits are achieved.
Kevin
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 4:43 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Positions
Will you wire the money immediately when this is done?
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]@ENRON
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 10:10 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Wesner-Soong, Sarah; Deffner, Joseph
Subject: Positions
Dear John
In place of the original transfer of options that we sent you
yesterday,
I
propose the following transfer instead. You will note that it
includes
no
options at all.
short 1660 May 2002 futures
Please understand that this entire affair is making me as
uncomfortable
as
it is clearly making you.
Kind regards
Kevin R Davis
**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply
to Enron Corp. at [email protected] and delete
all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence
a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/739.
|
subject: RE: Positions
content: being done as I write this
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]@ENRON
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 11:06 AM
To: Arnold, John
Subject: RE: Positions
734 and we're done
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 5:09 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Positions
we have already done the aug 03, how many may 02 do you want us to do?
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]@ENRON
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 10:54 AM
To: Arnold, John
Subject: RE: Positions
John
The simplest thing would be to disregard the 926 Aug'03 instructions and
to
do the 1660 May 02 only....
Your call
Kevin
-----Original Message-----
From: Davis, Kevin (LDN Int)
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 4:48 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: RE: Positions
The answer would be yes if it were the only ex-pit instructions we
received
today.
Given that you have instructed us already to ex-pit the 926 August 03
position, we would only want you to transfer 734 of the May 02 futures.
If you only do the 1660 May 02 or, if you do the 926 august 03 and 734
May
02 then YES, we will wire the money immediately after one or other of
those
expits are achieved.
Kevin
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 4:43 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Positions
Will you wire the money immediately when this is done?
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]@ENRON
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 10:10 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Wesner-Soong, Sarah; Deffner, Joseph
Subject: Positions
Dear John
In place of the original transfer of options that we sent you
yesterday,
I
propose the following transfer instead. You will note that it
includes
no
options at all.
short 1660 May 2002 futures
Please understand that this entire affair is making me as
uncomfortable
as
it is clearly making you.
Kind regards
Kevin R Davis
**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply
to Enron Corp. at [email protected] and delete
all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence
a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/74.
|
subject:
content: Jean:
I think the location i talked about before is actually better for you. The area towards the edge of the building borders the northeast gas group, long-term originators, and mid-market orig group. not exactly who you need to be around. the location in the center is much closer to the east gulf group, specifically sandra, and the same distance to the central and texas trading groups. most importantly, it provides room for both your group and the trading group to expand. call me if you want to talk further....
thanks for the article.
john
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/740.
|
subject: RE: $25 million
content: We just finished doing the xpit that they asked for. They have agreed to send the money immediately after that was done. We should be getting the money very soon. Hold off on the letter right now.
-----Original Message-----
From: Wesner-Soong, Sarah
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 11:43 AM
To: Arnold, John
Subject: $25 million
Legal drafted a letter demanding that EDF return the $25 million they withheld this morning. I want to send it to EDF to preserve our rights under the customer agreement and to discourage them from this behaviour in the future.
Did you ever hear back whether EDF was going to send this to you if you moved the short 1660 May 2002 futures positions? If you have already resolved the matter and gotten EDF to agree to return the money, I might hold off on sending this. Sarah
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/741.
|
subject: RE: Positions
content: Please notify me as soon as the wire has been sent. I assume you are working on this right now.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]@ENRON
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 11:13 AM
To: Arnold, John
Subject: RE: Positions
Thanks John.....
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 5:13 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Positions
being done as I write this
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]@ENRON
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 11:06 AM
To: Arnold, John
Subject: RE: Positions
734 and we're done
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 5:09 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Positions
we have already done the aug 03, how many may 02 do you want us to do?
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]@ENRON
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 10:54 AM
To: Arnold, John
Subject: RE: Positions
John
The simplest thing would be to disregard the 926 Aug'03 instructions
and
to
do the 1660 May 02 only....
Your call
Kevin
-----Original Message-----
From: Davis, Kevin (LDN Int)
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 4:48 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: RE: Positions
The answer would be yes if it were the only ex-pit instructions we
received
today.
Given that you have instructed us already to ex-pit the 926 August 03
position, we would only want you to transfer 734 of the May 02
futures.
If you only do the 1660 May 02 or, if you do the 926 august 03 and
734
May
02 then YES, we will wire the money immediately after one or other of
those
expits are achieved.
Kevin
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 4:43 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Positions
Will you wire the money immediately when this is done?
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]@ENRON
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 10:10 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Wesner-Soong, Sarah; Deffner, Joseph
Subject: Positions
Dear John
In place of the original transfer of options that we sent you
yesterday,
I
propose the following transfer instead. You will note that it
includes
no
options at all.
short 1660 May 2002 futures
Please understand that this entire affair is making me as
uncomfortable
as
it is clearly making you.
Kind regards
Kevin R Davis
**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
affiliate
and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
(or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender
or
reply
to Enron Corp. at [email protected] and delete
all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are
not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or
evidence
a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may
not
be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************
| ||
arnold-j/sent_items/742.
|
subject: FW: Positions
content: -----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]@ENRON
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 12:15 PM
To: Arnold, John
Subject: RE: Positions
John
As soon as Paribas put their side of the ex-pit into the clearing system we
will wire the funds IMMEDIATELY.
Kevin
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 6:12 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Positions
Please notify me as soon as the wire has been sent. I assume you are
working on this right now.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]@ENRON
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 11:13 AM
To: Arnold, John
Subject: RE: Positions
Thanks John.....
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 5:13 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Positions
being done as I write this
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]@ENRON
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 11:06 AM
To: Arnold, John
Subject: RE: Positions
734 and we're done
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 5:09 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Positions
we have already done the aug 03, how many may 02 do you want us to
do?
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]@ENRON
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 10:54 AM
To: Arnold, John
Subject: RE: Positions
John
The simplest thing would be to disregard the 926 Aug'03
instructions
and
to
do the 1660 May 02 only....
Your call
Kevin
-----Original Message-----
From: Davis, Kevin (LDN Int)
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 4:48 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: RE: Positions
The answer would be yes if it were the only ex-pit instructions we
received
today.
Given that you have instructed us already to ex-pit the 926 August
03
position, we would only want you to transfer 734 of the May 02
futures.
If you only do the 1660 May 02 or, if you do the 926 august 03 and
734
May
02 then YES, we will wire the money immediately after one or other
of
those
expits are achieved.
Kevin
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 4:43 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Positions
Will you wire the money immediately when this is done?
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]@ENRON
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 10:10 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Wesner-Soong, Sarah; Deffner, Joseph
Subject: Positions
Dear John
In place of the original transfer of options that we sent you
yesterday,
I
propose the following transfer instead. You will note that it
includes
no
options at all.
short 1660 May 2002 futures
Please understand that this entire affair is making me as
uncomfortable
as
it is clearly making you.
Kind regards
Kevin R Davis
**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
affiliate
and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use
of
the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or
disclosure
by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient
(or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the
sender
or
reply
to Enron Corp. at [email protected] and
delete
all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto)
are
not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or
evidence
a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of
its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may
not
be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.