prompt
stringlengths 3
940
| original_output
stringlengths 7
1.33k
| toxic
int64 0
1
|
|---|---|---|
:::Whose side are you on Brian? You dumbass motherfucker.
|
You are a professor at WVU for shit sake.
| 1 |
" What the hell is this? #This is rather silly, and
|
spamming all admins is downright obnoxious. Knock it off. "
| 1 |
it's not that i don't think the edit shouldn't have been reverted,
|
but come on, that place is full of niggers and spics!
| 1 |
. And don't give me the crap about his ancestors cuz
|
all Taiwanese (except natives) have a lineage of being Chinese
| 1 |
" *In the 20th century, Denmark Street had several Japanese businesses and was known as ""Little Tokyo"", but it became most famous as Britain's ""Tin Pan Alley"" housing numerous music publishers' offices. - Concurrently or subsequently? *to the Rookery - why the caps? The article refers to rookeries as a general noun. Do we have an article on this specific rookery? *Per WP:LEADLENGTH, this article should have one or two paragraphs in the lead at maximum *CN tag added. *As this is an article on a British subject, shouldn't the metres go first? *A lot of the sections are very short and could probably be merged. *Disambiguation pages: Jacobite, Fender
|
*Standardise whether or not you give life spans for people mentioned *Any more information on Little Tokyo? *Tokiwa restaurant and hotel - If this is the name of the restaurant (i.e. a proper name), it should not be in italics *By the end of the decade, - which decade, 1950s or 1960s? *Check for possible links, like Not Fade Away (song) for the Stones' single *In 1964, The Kinks with Page on guitar and Jon Lord, later to form Deep Purple, on piano, recorded ""You Really Got Me"" in one of the basement studios. - I'd nix ""later to form Deep Purple"" to keep this sentence clearer *More later"
| 0 |
"I just read the article, and I must say, I'm disappointed. This is an example of liberal bias. In the section ""Exceptionalism"", there is a sentence ""Much, if not all, of United States foreign policy has roots that can be traced back to this ideology."" Whoever made that remark needs to back it up with proof, not the opinions of a single liberal historian. Also, where is the mention of Stalin's speechs, where he basically says that global communism can never succeed until capitalism has been destroyed? This article is an attempt at making America and the USSR equally responsible for the Cold War. What a crock of shit. Is there any mention of Kruschev's (spelling?) ""we
|
will bury you"" comments? What about the Cuban missile crises? Too much space is dedicated to showing how historians disagree about the cold war, and not enough is dedicated to the major events of the cold war. This article is a disappointment and needs to be fixed. Liberal bias belongs in America's public school system, not in wikipedia. Why isnt the causes of the USSR's downfall listed? Let me guess, if a person comes into your home and tries to kill you, they are not evil, just of a different opinion, an opinon I should respect, right? This article is an example of why wikipedia will never make it in education, in its current form. "
| 0 |
. Man this fisherqueen is one hell of
|
a dumbass and im going to destroy wikipedia.
| 1 |
" ::I know there is a large number of lodges, both GL and PHGL, in the NYC area that is rapidly becoming more diverse and I think it's wonderful. However, this growth is not uniform within the US (it'd be great to have an international look at this). Even New York's neighboring states haven't seen close to the growth. For the past five years that I've attended the GL of Conn, I have only seen about a half dozen out of 400+ brothers, who are not of european descent. Also this year, I attended a Prince Hall MM Degree that was a multi-state convocation here in New Haven with 12 different PHGL's in attendence (A
|
great event, if I might add). Of the 150+ brothers there, myself and four other brothers from the GL of Conn were the only non-african americans there. I still wouldn't call an ethnically diverse lodge ""usual"" or ""common."" As a testiment to Blueboar and the NYC Brothers, the most ethnically diverse meeting of masons I have ever attended was seeing the Garibaldi Lodge EA degree in the GL of NY Building. That was quite an experience. ::On a side note, does anyone know of any varifiable data on this subject. Some good source material on this would be great, so we don't have to rely on ""in my GL...."" on ""at this meeting...."" "
| 0 |
Hey im gonna download a virus onto the network
|
next time you guys unblock me...have fun assholes.
| 1 |
" ==advice== The article was proposed for deletion by another editor, but he neglected to notify you: The reason given was: "" contravening orders of the New Zealand High Court; defamation of living persons; self-promotion; breaches Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living persons"" As reviewing administrator, I have declined to delete it, on the ground that the case is notable, since the NZ Supreme Court has accepted it for review, , we do not censor on the basis of court orders that have no effect in the US, & the other problems are fixable. However, it will undoubtedly be nominated for regular deletion, and you need to make some improvements immediately: Please read WP:BLP. n particular: ::every specific statement about
|
a person must be sourced to a third party source. For a controversial statement, it needs to be a published article in a news source, or a court judgmentnot the allegations in a brief or a statement by a party to the case. Reviews of his book in reliable publications are good sources; the book itself is not. Negative comment about him and about other parties must be very carefully handled. Only facts must be stated, not unsourced editorializing about them. Siemers comments of the judges are particularly problematic . It is my impression that an article of a paragraph or two might be more acceptable here, but nobody can predict the result of a WP:Articles for Deletion debate."
| 0 |
" : Hi Eating Nicely. Just posting here in response to the comments you made at . I'm still not sure why you need to edit with multiple accounts. Although there are valid reasons for doing so, I'm not sure if yours is one per WP:VALIDALT. The template you've added to your accounts makes it easier for others to see that you and ""Fighting Poverty"" are one and the same if they are looking at your user page, but this is not evident from looking at article histories, talk page posts, etc. For example, you used both accounts to post replies to Cryptic's talk page. Doing stuff like this can be confusing as pointed out
|
by 220 of Borg, even more so when the discussion is not specifically about your use of multiple accounts. If your areas of interest on Wikipedia are articles poverty and food, then you can more than sufficiently express that on a single user page and edit relevant articles using a single account. Most Wikipedia editors has varied interests and edit different types of articles, but they do not create separate accounts for each type. I think you need to be really careful doing this kind of thing because if you accidentally edit the same article/talk page using both accounts, it could give other editors the wrong impression and lead to serious problems. - "
| 0 |
" ==Red== Earlier today an anon editor added Red. I had not heard of them before this addition. I looked at their article and noticed that they were a fairly new band with only two albums to their credit. Then on my morning commute I heard a request on one of the podcasts I listen to. Again, the first time I had heard them to my knowledge and I listen to a few Christian rock podcasts. With the revert of my revert a comment was added 600K sales Grammy nomination US chart s #15 Topped Christian charts = popular enough. First, they're still not as popular as the other artists listed there: Skillet, Thousand Foot Krutch, Decyfer
|
Down, Underoath, Kutless, and Relient K. The highest their music charted was #15. That does not mean that they charted #15 in the year (in one chart and #1 in two others). I could be misreading the information though. They did have two number one singles which is impressive, but not an unheard-of feat. And they have sold a total of 600 000 between the two albums. The final point is that the paragraph starts: ""By the late 1990s and early 2000s"". They are a band from the late 2000s. Let's start a new paragraph and include information about Red and other, newer bands instead of trying to shoehorn them in with other more establish bands. "
| 0 |
" == Naming Conventions case == Just a question: seems to be a little ambiguous - does any user mean any party to this request, or every single user on Wikipedia? Further to this, and to potentially the answer to my question, does violates the consensus decision in this matter mean naming conventions of the disputed articles, or any articles in particular? {| class=""wikitable"" |- | || Violates the consensus decision in this matter means disputed articles related to the ArbCom request || Violates the consensus decision in this matter means any article naming under dispute |- | Any user means parties to the arbitration || Deals with situation
|
concisely, however means wikilawyering possible regarding what articles are ""related to the arbitration"" || Means that the parties are prohibited from violating concensus in relation to moves on any article; may be too broad for some |- | Any user means every user on Wikipedia || Prevents sockpuppets etc. because cases are defined, however suffers same problem as in the cell directly above || Extremely broad, may mean biting the newbies, ridiculous for every user on Wikipedia to be subject to the ArbCom remedy/enforcement |} Maybe I've gone off on a tagent here, and missed the implied meaning of this, but I'm confused at present. [ · ] "
| 0 |
"== Punic War == Why is this listed as a Punic war? While it occured between the first and second it is not actually a Punic War. The Punic Wars were all between Rome and Carthage. :It isn't exactly part of the Punic wars, but it is related to them. It was triggered as a result of the after-effects of the First Punic war, and the after-effects of the Mercenary War triggered another conflict between Rome and Carthage (very small and brief), which exaggerated the impact of the post-war indemnity that Rome demanded of Carthage. It can be argued that it was the oppressive conditions of the treaties and the resentment by Carthage/Hannibal Barca that
|
lead to the Second Punic War - so it did involve the Rome-Carthage conflicts indirectly. :It also was the event that elevated the Barcid family in Carthaginian society because of Hamilcar's generalship in the war. It could be argued that without this boost to the ""family fortunes"" that Hannibal Barca would not have been in a position to trigger the Second Punic war. :So, is it part of the Punic wars? Maybe; maybe not. Is it related to the Punic wars? Absolutely - without the Punic wars it wouldn't have occurred, and - arguably - without it the second Punic war might not have occurred, or would at least have been very different. - "
| 0 |
No you're not, you are just dumb enough
|
to use this guy for your THESIS, OMG!!!
| 1 |
== Semi-protected edit request on 23 January 2015
|
== say that he is a mother fucker
| 1 |
" :Hello, :Did you just say the video was taken from a secondary source? I am talking about this sentence: ""As usual, several websites are reporting the video"". YouTube videos are acceptable when they are embedded inside a reliable source, e.g. a PC World article by an acceptable author that has received editing from the magazine editor. It is the magazine, e.g. PC World, that adds credibility. Stripping the resource is similar to stripping a book of its cover and biographic profile (that contains title, author, ISBN, publisher, etc.), then using it as a source while representing it as ""a heap
|
of paper I just found"". As Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources mentions, a reliable source has three pillars: Content, author, editor. :As for fake videos on YouTube; no three person would enter a studio to film person impersonating a Microsoft authority interviewing Bliss photographer. I am afraid the real world is far more relentless. The fake part usually constitutes one word in a sentence that makes the whole different. And yes, things are starting to become personal; not Hollywood personal (at least not me), but like I said, the real world is far more relentless: It is butterfly effect. :Best regards, : "
| 0 |
furry balls and cant get no pussy everybody that
|
be editing this shit!!! haha ya'll are gay''']],
| 1 |
">2015 >Trying to get rid of Ben ""pull the trigger
|
on a nigger"" Garrison's wikipedia page top jej "
| 1 |
If you continue to warn me, you
|
will become like ''': stupid and retarded'''.
| 1 |
this is a boring ass element!!!...and your gay
|
cuz ur reading this....and cuz isaid so...bethessssss
| 1 |
" :Telling you that you are acting like an ass is not in any way shape or form attempting to pursade you to do anything. Stop trying to martyr yourself. It was a statement made regarding your attitute - as stated above basically ignoring anything which doesnt go your way. While you keep falling back on wiki policy it should be noted that according to the policy i havent actually breeched it ""Editors are human, capable of mistakes, so a few, minor, isolated incidents of incivility are not in themselves a concern."" :Now talking of ""consensus building"" - need i remind you yet again that all actions taken thus far have been made with the consensus of the community
|
(i.e. the creation of one article to cover the entire Med/ME theatre), which you come along about a month or so after it has all happened and decide you dont like what has happened and you plan on reverting it all - when you gained no consensus what so ever. Attempts to invole the wider community - considering they dont all sit looking at paticular userpages or article talk pages all day long - you have been rather opposed to. :I think you should ought to assume good faith too, and stop attempting to block all progress being made by popping up weeks/months down the line of events happening and reverting those decissions or threating to revert them. "
| 0 |
:Wikipedia can be improved by removing content
|
added by idiots like you. Fancy that.
| 1 |
" Since has been BLANKING my reply I place it here you canBLANK. * Who calls brown a kettle?. * ONE sock account blocked may be good for a [ROYAL FLUSH IN THE UNITED KINGDOM] and wiping arsehole with [ROYAL TOILET PAPER] or else [ROYAL GOLD TOILET PAPER]. * Watching, Patrolling, having faithful string pullers, software scripts..all this time you blocked only 30 sock accounts of mine? ...how about the rest 65,536 minus 30?.........resulted in nothing, ever NEVER. * of editing has ...resulted in nothing, ever NEVER. * Trying to speedily delete the Royal XXXX articles the way you & string pullers desparately wanted...resulted in nothing, ever NEVER. * How many hours have
|
wasted? attemting to do above. * Every thing is achieved including keeping the bastards honest & challanged, revealing their biased behaviours while continuing to enjoy a [hobby] contributing quality articles PLUS DONATING MONEY to wikipedia . * What have you achieved?, How many hours have you wasted?, How many times would you roll a stone up a hill only for it to roll down again?, How many times before you see the futility? Life is short. Don't waste it?...eat some better grass or think of least adding tags for every word for the articles that I edit. I CONSIDER YOUR BEHAVIOUR AS AN INSULT TO Wikipedia & it's great Founder. ( )."
| 0 |
"@Nicky mathew - 1)Your edit on MARCOS india page, is incorrect. Whatever sources you have used to mention that ""6000 marcos are operating and 1000 are on reserve"" , i would appreciate you to mention that source on the page, and if it all it is true i suggest you keep it to yourself because neither has the Indian Navy nor the Indian Defence ministry ever released the number of Marcos. Please do not challenge the secrecy of the unit. People who have enough evidence to suggest that marcos are secretive will understand that your mentioning of their strength, will find it irrelevant. 2) the picture of a man on-board a ship in black
|
overalls with his face shown is DEFINITELY not Marco, delete that picture, and do not reassign if anybody removes it. That man is part of indian navy infantry, please understand. check the photo again. its actually a disgrace for this elite if u put such irrelevant pictures. 3) editing certain repeated words and sentences should be allowed in that page. It is everybody's page. Anybody can provide accurate information. The number 0.27 sec for reaction is again an invalid edit. please remove it and use simple words to suggest their capability neither one of us are in marcos and it is highly unlikely that you have visited INS abhimanyu to have a look. "
| 0 |
"As someone with mixed family ethnicity, I'm going to step in for a second: the article in question needs to be re-read in order to stop the complaints pronto. When one reads it, it is necessary to understand the history of US-USSR relations at the time. In the US, communism was bad - indeed, communists were the enemy - ""pinkos"". Everybody in the US hated the commies. Picture this imaginary conversation between am American (A) and someone from the USSR (U): * A: You communists are despicable! * U: No, we're not, it's simply a different economic concept... * A: But you make people work, take their wages, and redistribute them! That's sick! * U: To each
|
according to their needs, from each according to their ability... * A: Pinko bastards, you're war-mongering freaks! * U: We're freaks? This coming from a country where they still find it OK to lynch people of colour?!??!? Very much a ""don't point your finger at someone else, unless your own hands are clean"" kind of message that yes, indeed, is propaganda intended to deflect American concerns about the communist state. Truly, the message in and of itself by mocking the American belief that lynching was OK, actually says that lynching was bad. Lynching is therefore not a joke, but America (who turned a blind eye to lynching their own residents) were the joke. Bwilkins / BMW "
| 0 |
"== Copyright problem removed == Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.civilwararchive.com/Unreghst/unmocav2.htm#12th. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see ""using copyrighted works from others"" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or ""donating copyrighted materials"" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source
|
of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. "
| 0 |
== Rubbish == Roy Hodgson is rubbish, and
|
the Wikipedia article on him should reflect this.
| 1 |
":::::::::::::::So, you know what i'm trying to do without reading my mind because for you it is proven whitewashing if somebody disagrees with what you believe to be the truth. There is a specific term to describe this way of thinking . What was it?? In real life we would not bother to carry on with this discussion. You would not care to discuss further with a whitewasher and i would not give a damn to try to persuade somebody who thinks like that. Problem is that we are here on Wikipedia, where we at least have to try to agree. Here my advice to you is once more to overcome yourself and cease for some time to believe i am a whitewasher and pretend to believe that
|
i really mean what i write.(AGF). This may enable you to respond to my arguments rather than repeating what you believe.I don't know what we otherwise can do. You probably don't expect me to change my opinion just because you feel like it.In case this article is saved from the revert attacks, which kill all the editing ,(including your's),i will do something about it. I don't wish to complicate this situation with new inputs and deletions and reverts on these two paragraphs while this nonsense is going on. Until then, and unless you produce arguments, i will not waste my time anymore.I underline my disagreement to your additions to the section ""Hemşinli in Turkey"". I have presented arguments for my objection whereas you have not presented counterarguments. "
| 0 |
::::fuck u u cunt i hope u die of fuckin
|
cancer or hit by train suck balls motherfucker b!tch
| 1 |
I will find out where you live, slit your fucking throat, rip
|
your cock out and jam it in the wound. Pussy bitch cunt!
| 1 |
==file: anglospeak.svg== I need help to determine if I am being overly sensitive or if is being as difficult as I feel he is. The discussion in question, regarding the anglospeak map, is located on the [commons], and I have also tried to bring it up with him on his commons talk page [Joeldl]. IMHO, he is distorting, and interpreting in isolation, the meaning of what I say, and he is also saying I have said things which I have not. In addition, I feel that he is being argumentative and is making his own survey less than productive. Further, he seems to attack that which he doesn't agree with. Finally, I feel that he may be trying to
|
go this route of a survey on the commons instead of the English_language or file_talk:anglospeak.svg talk pages because he apparently has been going around and around with other users about the map. I can see that he has done a lot on Wiki and he knows the ropes really well. Whereas, I'm new (mostly inactive) and know very little about the ins and outs of Wiki, and maybe I'm just too sensitive, so I really need a neutral party to help me see the real situation. I don't want to keep on arguing with him - I want to come to a compromise that is acceptable for all (not just him)- but he doesn't seem to want that. HELP!
| 0 |
== Rapist == he is a gross
|
rapist who raped his sisters!!!! From Daddysgroovygirl
| 1 |
" ::::There are several problems with a 95% solution based on our existing categories. One is the idea that a 95% solution would be acceptable either to us or our critics. Considering our categorisation backlog on Commons the other 5% is rather more than 95% of the work in such an approach, and any approach that made use of our categories would have to answer the awkward question of how you implement it without putting obligations on either our uploaders or our categorisers. A second problem is the issue of where you draw the line between hardcore and softcore pornography. The easy bit is saying that various images that would be considered hardcore by most US and UK standards are hardcore,
|
the difficult thing would be to set the boundary between softcore and hardcore in a way that makes sense to editors from Milan, Mumbai and Medina. If we were just catering for a North American or even First World market than an image filter would be difficult and complex; But we aim to serve the whole world and that means we can't simply impose one culture's filter on everyone. This is a complex problem and if we decide to tackle it we need a complex solution that seems simple to its users but handles the complexity of a world where some regard a woman's face as taboo, some are shocked by breasts and others will accept penises if flaccid. ''Chequers'' "
| 0 |
"==Notability of DJ Trypcide== A tag has been placed on DJ Trypcide, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding
|
to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. "
| 0 |
yall need to quit bitching about every thing holy
|
shit go fuck someone and catch a fucking disease
| 1 |
"::::::::::::I don't understand that, James. Maybe I got your explanation confused. I don't think you are saying that pedophilia should not be defined as a sexual preference (as a primary sexual interest). That goes against your arguments for it being defined as a sexual preference. You have often made the distinction between it (a preference) and child molestation (the act). So are you saying that a person cannot be primarily sexualy interested in adults and prepubescent children? If so, this article is not saying that either. Or are you saying that the ""exclusive"" part is not needed, because ""primary"" takes care
|
of it? My thing with ""primary"" taking care of it is that it makes it sound as though pedophiles often have some other sexual object choice (pubescents or post-pubescents). I don't always relate the ""non-exclusive"" offender to a ""primary"" offender, though it can mean that. I take ""primary"" to mean a pedophile who often sexually focuses on prepubescent children and can get a little sexually aroused by pubescents or post-pubescents. I take ""exclusive"" to mean pedophiles who have no chance whatsoever of becoming sexually aroused by pubescents or post-pubescents. But you feel this istinction is not important or needed? "
| 0 |
:I was under the impression you were being
|
vandalized with words like NIGGER and SIEG HIEL.
| 1 |
== WP:AID == Why did you change the color on the AID template. I'd like to change it back (for template uniformity) but I think it's only fair to hear your side of the argument first. - :Well, both the AID banner and Wikipedia:Community Portal now use Template:IDRIVE-current. This is so that when the title of the current collaboration is changed in one place, it changes everywhere else it is used. We recently changed all the other collaborations on the Community Portal to use this technique so that the Portal could be locked to protect it from vandalism, while still allowing collaborations to be updated by non-admins. It also makes it impossible to forget to update the Portal
|
when updating the banner. Unfortunately, I had some trouble getting the color of the link to be different on different pages using the same template, so I thought it was easier just to change the color of the AID banner so that text of the same color could be readable on both pages. I think if you moved the [[ ]]'sout of the template and into the two pages that use the template, you could probably use similar markup to what you were using before in the AID banner to make the link text white. Personally, I really don't care what color the banner is, as long as the text is readable and the collaboration title is synced.
| 0 |
Problem with that you jackhole is that I know what's
|
in the Buhl building because I'm fucking sitting in it!!!
| 1 |
" These guys SUCK! They did a pussy version of ""Snap
|
Your Fingers, Snap Your Neck"". The singer sounded like a faggot."
| 1 |
CODY IS A LOSER. CODY IS A LOSER. CODY IS A LOSER. CODY IS
|
A LOSER. CODY IS A LOSER. CODY IS A LOSER. CODY IS A LOSER.
| 1 |
"== Copyright problem removed == Prior content in this duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://aambis.com/about-us. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see ""using copyrighted works from others"" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or ""donating copyrighted materials"" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source
|
of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. "
| 0 |
==Dick== You dick, I fuck thee for all hate
|
that you have toward me. - Penguin Eater/Wikinger.
| 1 |
Are you blind or stupid? This text was BEFORE I WENT THERE.
|
I DID NOT PLACE IT. I CHANGED IT AND MOVED PARTS.
| 1 |
" :Completely unacceptable rewrite, sorry. :Please answer this point before attempting to try editing again (rather than rewriting) my introductory section: 98% of those who come here can be presumed to be baffled by UTF-16 and what it's about. They need an introductory section which explains things simply. Really as simply as possible. :I don't personally give a monkey's whether UCS-2 diverts here... change that then if you're so obsessed by this, and create a UCS article. In fact I'm going to do it for you. And/or you have the option of explaining the history of UTF-16 in a subequent section in this article. In fact I'm going to do that for you too. :What you know in your
|
heart of hearts is that very few people are going to bother reading either such a section or such an article. They're not going to be interested, and you have no right at all to interfere with their legitimate desire to learn how UTF-16 works from the motive that ""Oh, but they have to know what UCS-2 is and how the IEEE and the UC battled it out."" NO. THEY. DON'T. :By all means edit my stuff if you find it not neutral enough. But I repeat: the primary function of this introductory section is to explain the basics, in simple terms. You have no right to make it confusing for non-IT-experts in the way your rewrite did. "
| 0 |
Derhexer you're a fucking asshole. you probably live in your
|
moms basement and jack off to gay porn. FUCK YOU
| 1 |
" == BN == Hi Ligulem, We don't know each other, but I just read the WP:BN thread. I have Christmas guests, so I can t do this justice, but I tried to read the thread through your eyes, or at least, my eyes in a similar situation. I have been part of a community which I left for years and then returned. The return is with trepidation, who will be here, obviously a lot of new people, but will the veterans remember me, how will they greet me? Will it be like the return of a veteran to a small town, with a ticker tape parade, or maybe a little more subdued, with a lot of ""great to see you again"" and ""hey, there's still a lot to do let's get to work"".
|
Yet it wasn't like that at all, it was the third degree. Why do you want the tools? Why are you qualified? Perhaps forgetting that a message was sent to you stating that you could simply ask for the bit back, and it would be granted. Your response was remarkably measure given that the reception can't possibly have matched what you expected. I understand your final comment, and I don't even urge you to reconsider and ask again immediately, but I do hope you return, pick up editing , read some of the policies , and determine for yourself if you feel comfortable asking for the bit back. As was hinted, there was a bad incident relatively recently, which is prompting some of the questions—I'm sorry you got caught in the cross-fire. "
| 0 |
"== The ""vulgarity-filled section"" == (vulgarity-fill section removed) This edit was made by an unregistered user who objected not so much to the vulgarities, as to the thoughts behind them. I have restored the deleted passage, editing the expletives. Billbrock man, this dude is f***ed up. [1]. jglc | t | c + Edited expletive Billbrock - It is a not a surprise to me that the info is there. I have been aware of him for more than a year. He is certainly a bright man in many ways, but he obviously does not value what we would call his ""privacy"". Maybe he feels he can afford to be completely honest about
|
his personal life. His life is unique and interesting and accomplished. That is why I created his page. BTW: If you would like to see Yale and F-ed up together, try this page: Elizabeth Morgan. And you are a philosophy major? Amorrow + - :Oh, yeah, I'm not gonna call into question his achievements or whatever. I find something vaguely demeaning in his description of sexual encounters, though. And, yeah. Yale's mad f***ed up. Rumor is that there's a portrait of Eli Yale, in Yale, Inc.'s boardroom, with him holding a slave by the collar. That's f***ed up. And, yup, philo and bio double-major. jglc | t | c Italicized section restored. "
| 0 |
":I would suggest that if, say, there is a ""DC Announcements Panel"" and the confirmed panels are Joe Smith, Jane Doe, and John Roe, that those are the official panelists whom Marvel invited. If Summit Entertainment had a ""Twilight Panel"" that includes Actor Jane, Actor John, Producer John and Director Jane, that those are Summit's official panelists. :That's a technical observation. Two other thoughts: :Aside from things like the ""Marvel Silver Age Panel,"" which is not organized by Marvel itself as far as I can tell, most of the panels are not so much historical or cultural as they as are promotional and commercial. How much value is there
|
in listing the names of people brought out for primarily promotional purposes? They're essentially commercials. (A panel may be incidentally promotional, of course; for example, a panel on the history of science fiction that includes Ray Bradbury may take place while Bradbury happens to have a new book out, but that's not the purpose of convening that panel.) Secondly, this threatens to become simply a list of hundreds of names. (Let's say 20 panels a day, 5 people per panel, three days of panels, that's 300 names.) :I'm not taking sides. I'm just bringing up discussion points before anyone goes to any great lengths of time and effort. "
| 0 |
" :Reliable sources are for factual claims, not interpretations. Reliable sources say Beethoven's 9th is beautiful. Nonetheless, Wikipedia should not say Beethoven's 9th is beautiful. An encyclopedia doesn't interpret things. In this case, the difference between adding ""by some"" or not is that without ""by some"" Wikipedia is stating as a fact that all Holocaust demnal is anti-Semitic, whereas if you add the ""by some"" we are making it clear that this is an interpretatation. Neither is very good. The proper way to present the idea is with some information about the prevalence of the interpretation as anti-Semitic. I doubt anybody has
|
bothered to research it, so I doubt there is anything encyclopedic that can be said about it. This is really just a small case of the usual Wikipedia bullshit of people using the encyclopedia to promote their worldview. Whether it's an article on Jesus or Middle East politics, this community is full of hate-mongering ideologues who would rather shove their self-glorifying ideologies down the throat of the world than produce a fair and balanced enyclopedia that has has integrity. There is a reason that study of the reliability of Wikipedia that everybody likes to cite only looked at science articles. "
| 0 |
man utd r shit jus admit it its al
|
about the boys in blue nd white !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
| 1 |
== hey u == hey tell me how cum
|
your not there today cum on tell me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
| 1 |
== Ruined == What moron ruined this page !!
|
Its all trash now its unusable revert it immeadeatly
| 1 |
::Actually, I agree with Andy in that the carbon content is probably about dead on. Give me a day or so to go through my sources, but I'm know I have it around here somewhere... ::The thing to understand about the Japanese swords is that they were made from different kinds of steel all assembled together in the same sword. The smiths were very careful in choosing the correct steel from the kera. The hocho iron typically contains about 0.00 to .05% carbon. The tamahagane contains about 1.0 to 1.5% carbon (not a very high-carbon steel) and the nabe-gane is cast-iron at between 3 and 4% carbon. The final product is produce
|
by combining the nabe-gane with the tamahagane, to increase its carbon content through diffusion. Depending on how much carbon was added to the tamahagane, and how much diffusion (folding) occurred, the final, refined steel could range from pure iron for the core to very high cartbon steel for the edge. Even the WWII swords were often made by forging both high and low carbon steels together, resulting in a visible mokume (wood-grain) pattern. They used regular mill steel for this, not tamahagane. The Japanese farmed out this work to forgers all over the country, but I believe as much as 80% of the WWII swords were made in the town of Seki.
| 0 |
Vandalism -followed by incompetence Back in 2010, this article was vandalised - turning a stub article about the way market trading across timezones creates a 24-hour 'day' into an article about an entirely fictitious 'holiday' supposedly held on the first Monday of each year. Sadly, vandalism of articles is hardly rare - but what has happened since strikes me as a classic example of just how flawed Wikipedia can be. As the edit history shows. not only had the vandalism gone unnoticed (despite an edit summary that more or less announced outright that it had been vandalised), but the article has been renamed (presumably since it was supposedly about a specific
|
'Day' rather then merely mundane 'days'...), proposed for deletion, had the deletion turned down, and generally tinkered with - all the while with nobody bothering to check the edit history to see whether self-evident bollocks about a holiday where everyone keeps working was legitimate. Sheer fucking incompetence. I have reverted back to the unsourced stub prior to vandalism, and am going to watchlist this article - as no doubt without keeping an eye on it, another incompetent will be along to 'correct' it by copying the holiday bollocks back in from one of the numerous Wikipedia mirrors that have picked up this heap of garbage. We can do better than this.
| 0 |
:No one cares about Guy Fawkes Day in the U.S.
|
Guy Fawkes? What's a Guy Fawkes? Some stupid Euro holiday.
| 1 |
" :::I have heard people describe Madonna
|
as ""a stupid famewhore slut"" "
| 1 |
"===May 2007=== A tag has been placed on Scott's Lab, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If you feel that you can assert the notability of
|
the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. "
| 0 |
" I kept Double Fantasy in the intro because it won the Grammy (which it would not have if he hadn't been killed) and it was his last record and associated with his death. It's true that both POB and Imagine were critically acclaimed (and, at the time, Double Fantasy was universally panned) but you may or may not have been around for the ""songs addition"" debate to the intro (everyone adding their favorite Lennon song; I believe we've reached a consensus that despite all his great songs, the global impact of ""Imagine"" and ""Give Peace"" cannot be matched by ""Instant Karma"" or ""Tight Ass"" I'm just trying to keep what is supposed to be an *overview* of an incredible,
|
diverse career from getting bogged down. I did like your suggestion to remove the family/sons bit from the intro, which I did. I don't want to crowd this article up so much that it becomes tedious to read. That includes the inclusion of the not-yet made movie ""Nowhere Boy"" there are over 20 movies about Lennon (and Imagine #2 which was technically ""by"" him) but since we don't (and shouldn't) list them all, we're not going to start with that one. I know you weren't the one who put in the movie info. Lennon was named ""an icon of the 20th Century"" (which is more impressive than ""a cultural icon""), but I can't find the reference for it just yet."
| 0 |
" **And Joefromrandb's finally response is
|
notable as well: ""Fuck off"" "
| 1 |
" 2011 (UTC) :::::::: I agree with Wikifan. If we cannot agree on the definition of terrorism, this Wikipedia article must be deleted. My favorite definition of terrorism is the one proposed by Boaz Ganor: ""Terrorism is the deliberate use of violence aimed against civilians in order to achieve political ends."" If Taliban, Haqqani Network, and al-Qaeda members are freedom fighters, than Anders Behring Breivik is also a freedom fighter, and yet Wikipedia calls him ""Norwegian terrorist."" According to the Geneva Conventions all military forces including guerrillas must wear uniforms or distinctive clothing so that it is clear that they are combatants. Taliban, Haqqani
|
Network, and al-Qaeda are, according to the Geneva Conventions, terrorists, because they do not wear distinctive clothing and they hide among the civilian population. During WWII American and British troops shot such terrorists on the spot - no military trial was necessary. Excerpt from Third 1949 Geneva Convention: ""if resistance movements are to benefit by the Convention, they must respect the four special conditions contained in sub-paragraphs (a) to (d)... '(b) that of having a fixed distinctive sign recognizable at a distance' (30): for partisans a distinctive sign replaces a uniform... and must be worn constantly, in all circumstances..."" source: http://www.icrc.org/ihl.nsf/COM/375-590007?OpenDocument 22:35, 29 December"
| 0 |
== 5x5 == is also a badybulders rutine, maybe
|
some considoration for the healthy people u fukkkin nerd
| 1 |
" == Description == The AHSA describes itself as ""... a national grassroots organization ...."" 25 Apr 2005 The domain name: http://www.huntersandshooters.com for the American Hunters and Shooters Association (AHSA) was registered by DCS - Internet Advocacy Group, mailing address: 600 Pennsylvania Ave SE, Suite 200, Washington, DC 20003 The same mailing address was given on the DCS website http://dcscongressional.com/ and on the DCS domain name registration as on the original AHSA website and AHSA domain name registration. 3 Aug 2005 The registration for http://www.huntersandshooters.com was changed to show the AHSA, not DCS, as the owner of
|
the site name. At the local gun club and range, I shoot in several target shooting disciplines, have aided a reserve deputy practicing with his sidearm, participated and observed qualification tests for handgun permits, hunter safety courses, etc,years of various club activities in other wordsand I have never seen an AHSA presence. A website-only ""grassroots organization"" created by a PR firm, DCS, whose biggest client is the Democratic Leadership Council, and whose main product appears to be press releases supporting gun control policies looks and feels like astroturf to me. Excuse me if I remain skeptical. "
| 0 |
who wrote this?whoeva did needs to tell me sista!ya
|
big freakin' bowl of shit and fuck.FUCK UUUUUUU!!!!!!!
| 1 |
"Brown’s Gas. Brown’sches Gas Wasser (H2O) kennt neben Eis, fluessigem Wasser und Dampf noch einen 4. Zustand. Das haben Physiker jetzt entdeckt. ""Bei bestimmten Experimenten mit Wasserstoff(-Plasma) kann die bekannte Physik die Resultate nicht mehr erklaeren"" sagt ein Professor fuer Plasma-Physik der TU Eindhoven in Holland. Es erscheinen Energiemengen, deren Herkunft ungeklaert ist. Der Amerikaner Yull Mills behauptet, die Loesung zu haben: die Energie steckt in der Elektronenhuelle der Wasserstoffatome und wird ohne Absicht teilweise freigesetzt, je 27.2 eV bei jedem Kleinereignis. Mit der gezielten Freisetzung beschaeftigen sich Leute, die mit Brown's Gas
|
experimentieren. Sie haben gefunden, das im Wasser Energie steckt. Ohne das erklaeren zu koennen, versuchen sie, die gewonnenen Energiemengen zu steigern. Spannend! Dass H2 und O (Knallgas) in einer Explosion zu Wasser werden, ist bekannt. Doch Brown’sches Gas, das eine gelbbraune Farbe hat und wahrscheinlich aus O und H und H besteht, explodiert nicht, sondern es implodiert, wenn es mit einem Funken gezündet wird. Auch bei der Implosion kommt viel Energie frei. Wer kann das erklaeren? Die Physik von Wasserstoff und Wasser muss neu geschrieben werden. Danach sieht es aus! P.M. Brown"
| 0 |
Seriously, this is looking like crap, can't
|
we just have QG blocked for WP:SOAPBOX?
| 1 |
== Everyone does == I bet even other teachers hate her!I know
|
that everyone in our class hates her. SHE IS A BITCH!!!!
| 1 |
" ::It should come as no surprise to you that I have a dedicated guberniya infobox on my to-do list ) created one a while ago (see ; used in Kazan Governorate), but I wouldn't deploy it as-is just yet, because it was mostly a copy-paste of with a few modifications. If you have any suggestions about improving it, I'll gladly add them to the list of features to implement. As usual, however, I am not making any guarantees as to when I'll actually get to coding this infobox (I hate to make promises which I might not be able to keep). ::As for the article about namestnichesvo, we should definitely have something but I am still not entirely sure what the title of the article
|
should be. I've seen ""vice-royalty"" used in some sources, but it does not seem to be very common in academic works; and straight ""namestnichestvo"" seems like an awful clumsy name (which is not terribly common either). Many sources seem to just use terms ""governorate"" and ""namestnichestvo"" interchangeably, which is not always a good practice, but it shows that we are not the only ones having trouble with terminology ) Might as well use ""vice-royalty"" if nothing better occurs to us; it is at least an English word. ::Finally, do you have any objections to the title ""Little Russia Governorate""? I am not 100% sure myself, but I don't really have any compelling reasons why this would not be a good title. Cheers,— • ; "
| 0 |
" ::In addition, Nixon's impeachment course was not simply political rhetoric, it was a near inescapable reality. :::From the New York Times (Aug. 8, 1974), ""His chances of being acquitted were almost hopeless. Senator Barry, Goldwater, the Arizona conservative who was the Republican Presidential candidate in 1964, told him that he had no more than 15 votes in the Senate, far short of the 34 he needed to be sure of escaping conviction. Members of his own staff, including Gen. Alexander M. Haig Jr., the White House chief of staff, strongly recommended that he step down in the national interest."" ::He wouldn't have resigned if he thought he could beat
|
it. :::From Nixon's resignation speech: ""Throughout the long and difficult period of Watergate, I have felt it was my duty to persevere to make every possible effort to complete the term of office to which you elected me. In the past few days, however, it has become evident to me that I no longer have a strong enough political base in the Congress to justify continuing that effort."" ::So you ask, ""Why make mention of him if he wasn't impeached?"" In all but official action, he was. And for that reason, and the reasons I mention above, he should be mentioned in the article alongside Clinton and Johnson. "
| 0 |
" LA CHIESA CRISTIANA IN ITALIA, di Frosinone, E' UNA SETTA PERICOLOSA! Sono state rilevate persino delle accuse di pedofilia a carico del personaggio in questione, il falso pastore Maurizio Morandi come pure di calunnie, minaccie e violenze private di un suo amico e collega: http://archiviostorico.corriere.it/2003/luglio /16/amore_molesto_santone_finisce_tribunale_co_10_030716006.shtml — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.40.15.108 (talk) THE CHRISTIAN CHURCH IN ITALY, of Frosinone, 'A DANGEROUS SECT'! Were detected even accusations of pedophilia charged
|
to the character in question, the false pastor Maurizio Morandi as well as slander, threats and private violence of his friend and colleague: http://archiviostorico.corriere.it/2003/July /16/amore_molesto_santone_finisce_tribunale_co_10_030716006.shtml BEWARE THE FALSE PASTOR MAURIZIO MORANDI (https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utente:Maurizio.morandi-1970) https://salvatorelopes.wordpress.com/2012/11/22/guardatevi-dal-pastore-maurizio-morandi-e-dal-sito-www-chiesadifrosinone-it-perche-non-credono-nella-divinita-di-gesu/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by — Preceding unsigned comment added by Continue Vandalism of the false pastor Maurizio Morandi. Protect this voice, please !!! Continue Vandalism of the false pastor Maurizio Morandi. Protect this voice, please !!!"
| 0 |
so you're the old wise asshole who
|
thinks /sandbox is better than brick/mortar.
| 1 |
" ==You guys have got to be kidding!== I thought that tongue piercings were purely for the use in sexual stimulation through oral sex and I firmly believe that this should be included in the article as this is the reason why most, if not all, people choose to get a tongue piercing. any guy who hasn't had a girl swallow his dick with her tongue sticking out (of which I've been told helps them breathe, for some reason or in some mysterious way that of which I just cannot understand or comprehend) with a tongue ring through it, is missing out. And also girls seem to like it as well (I'm talking about
|
licking them out, although I have been told that they enjoy giving head also, ""otherwise why else would (they) do it"" - I have also been told that this only applies to big dicks...not sure on those last two (unreliable source of information = girl giving head at the time, could have just been saying it...but when your told the same thing by a number of girls, it could possibly add up to the truth)). P.S. the whole thing about the girl sticking her tongue out while down on her knees, giving head...it reduces contact with those pretty little (sharp and (medi)evil looking) teeth and also feels really really good...for the person recieving. "
| 0 |
Are you high? it wont need to make 22
|
million go back home and smoke your crack pipe
| 1 |
" == Moroccon Medal Pic == Hi there. I think we should consider undeleting Image:OrderOA.jpg. It was at least two years ago that I uploaded it, but this was a photograph of an original medal which an employee of the National Archives took and released to public domain. I'm fully prepared to give you an address to verify this and even the direct phone number of the employee who took it. This is not a stolen picture, it is legit and also very rare since very few of these medals exist anymore. I think this one can safely be put back on Wikipedia. - :These two as well fall under the same category. Pictures sent directly to me by an employee of
|
the National Archives. :Image:LuxCDGcit.jpg, Image:LuxWarCross.jpg - ::This one too: Image:WherHonClasp.jpg. Different employee, but again a picture straight from an original taken at the National Archives. - ::Rather than an address/phone number, it would be better to have the employee send an e-mail from his official e-mail address - this can be filed at OTRS. Or you can forward the e-mail you recieved, complete with headers - this is what I normally do with image permissions. :::He's right. An email from NARA to OTRS confirming that s/he took the image in the course of his/her duties or otherwise releases it would be best. And that would solve the problem, as long as the underlying medal is also in the PD. || "
| 0 |
== SCIENTOLOGY HOAX == scientology is full of
|
faggot ass bitches who should all die
| 1 |
" :::::[Darwinbish disgorges a dishevelled and groggy Antandrus.
|
] Silly user! Too big! '''' ."
| 1 |
== I DONT KNOW IF I AM OK OR NOT == I THINK I AM GETTING MORE AND MORE PSYCHO THESE DAYS DONT YOU THINK. YEAH YEAH YEAH YEAH YEAH. I THINK ITS BECAUSE OF WEEDS. YEP. THE BESTEST THINGS EVER! AND MARIJUANA AND COCAINE AND MARIJUANA AND COCAINE AND HEROIN AND HEROINE AND HERO. YEP YOU ARE MY HERO! ) AND I DONT SMOKE NO WEEDS OR MARIJUANA OR COCAINE OR HERO OR WHATEVER BC I AM JUST PSYCHO ENOUGH TO BE COOL LIKE PEOPLE WHO DO DRUGS! YAYYYYYYYYYY! AND I THINK MORE PEOPLE SHOULD LEAVE COMMENT ON THIS THING, IT MAKES ME CRAZY NO ONE HAS A WIKIPEDIA ACCOUNT ESPECIALLY THEY ASK ME Y WOULD I EVEN HAVE ONE AND
|
I RESPOND BY SINGING THAT MAHNKEY GORIRRA QIN-PAN-JI SONG AGAIN HAHAHAHAHHHAAHHAAA. OH GOD DAMMIT IM BORED. MAY BE I SHOULD RESTART DOING LIVEJOURNAL/XANGA AGAIN GUYS! YAYYYYYYYY! IONO I HAVE TO MUCH SCHOOL WORK YUUUUCK! I HATE IT BUT AT THE SAME TIME IONO Y IM SUCH A GPA WHORE AND I FUCK GPA. YEP! DONT YOU THINK IM JUST AS PSYCHO AS PPL WHO DO DRUG???? NOPE I DONT DO NO DRUGS AND I DONT DRINK EITHER BUT ITS JUST THAT IM JUST COOL ENOUGH TO BE LIKE PPL WHO DO DRUGS AND DRINK EITHER. YAYYYY I LOVE THIS POST I THINK ILL ACTUALLY POST THIS ON MY JOURNAL OR SOMETHING UR MY HERO WHOEVER UR BORED ENOUGH TO BE READING THIS!
| 0 |
== Editing the “Personal Life” section of Congressman Lamar Smith’s Wikipedia page == To any editors or watchers of the Wikipedia page of Congressman Lamar Smith: I serve as the Political Director for Congressman Lamar Smith. I wish to respectfully raise concerns about the section “Personal Life.” I would also like to suggest a replacement edit to the line in question. I would like to ask an unbiased Wikipedia editor to review the problem. The problem is as follows: In the “Personal Life” section of Congressman Lamar Smith’s page, it states, “He divides his time between homes in San Antonio and Hyannisport, Massachusetts.” The Congressman returns home from Washington, D.C. to his district nearly every weekend. Congressman Smith has spent
|
a total of two hours in Hyannisport, Massachusetts, in the last three years, solely as a tourist, and is willing to give an affidavit to that effect. Per the Biographies of Living Persons policy, if there is no source for a piece of information about a living person (whether it is positive info or negative) then it should be removed. This is why I’m asking for another editor to consider making the following change: I would suggest removing the line “he divides his time between homes in San Antonio and Hyannisport, Massachusetts.” As previously mentioned, Congressman Smith keeps a busy schedule traveling from Washington, D.C. to his home in San Antonio and rarely spends any time in Hyannisport, Massachusetts.
| 0 |
What?=== Stupid Twit? I thought you assies were to
|
busy screwing kangaroos to give a shit. =
| 1 |
" ==Muhammad== Sorry for the late reply, Matt. None of those authors seem to have anything about them to demonstrate they are reliable sources. No PhDs in Islamic studies, nothing but their own opinions and in some cases, popular history books. They should not be used to source anything other than their own opinions, or information about themselves. However, they are all notable, so sometimes their opinions will be notable enough to be discussed in Wikipedia. Even in that case we still need to use reliable sources - that is, not their own books, but some other reliable, secondary source commenting on their opinion. This was the problem at Criticism of the Qur'an, it was basically just a list of Spencer's
|
personal criticisms sourced to his own books. He does belong on that page, but he should be referred to as something like, ""According to the New York Times, Spencer is one of the most prominent critics of the Quran. He has criticized so-and-so about it, according to this peer-reviewed article by a real Islam scholar."" As for a policy on this, I don't think there needs to be much more than WP:SOURCES already says: ""Articles should rely on reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy"". There are plenty of these about. If you see any specific cases where an unreliable source is being used, please let me know, and I'll try to help rectify it. / "
| 0 |
you fucking braindead oroszka 50% of the syrian government
|
is sunni including the first lady and the army.
| 1 |
" * Context for the comments made by NazariyKaminski in his edit summaries & by others on talk page, linked to from the Guardian article cited: http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2014/01/22/wayne_slater_paints_wendy_davis_as_a_gold_digger_and_a_bad_mother_in_the.html http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/01/21/wendy-davis-sexism_n_4638465.html * What is described in these articles seems to be reflected in the language and reasoning used by them. * Also, back to NazariyKaminski's claim about re ""FACT that she lived in Mistletoe Heights and not in trailer until Harv"". No where in the sources that state that she was living with her child in a trailer as a single mother claimed that she continued
|
to live there until Harvard. The neighbourhood she lived in with Jeff is not a particularly notable fact. No where does it say they lived together in a trailer. His profession is well documented and noted in the article, and referenced later in the law career section. I could not see where the neighbourhood would tie in to the rest of the article. I also do not see any reference to her living in a trailer in this article even though it was widely reported and symbolic significance to her economic background. "
| 0 |
Welcome! Hello Chanman121, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help
|
page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: *The five pillars of Wikipedia *How to edit a page *Help pages *Tutorial *How to write a great article *Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!
| 0 |
" ==So let me understand this== *No replies to any of my questions of editors on that AfD, and you delete it prior to 7 days? *User BMK states this to my questions of his comments and this is allowable for Wikipedia? :duh, no, i only does whatz all da udders duz cause i aint got no brainses. You kmow what, you can stick your comment where the sun doesn't shine, sweetheart. If you don't like the way I !voted, based on my own personal evaluation of the material, there's nothing much you can do about it, but insulting me rates right up there at the top of the list of shit you can do which will make it absolutely certain that there's
|
no possible chance of changing my mind. Now, stop being a jerk and hassling editors who disagree with you.(Oh, and yes, my !vote actually does count. It's enough to make you cry, innit?)]"" yet I never insulted this editor, so again he is stating something that is false. *""I don't have a clue what the fuck you're talking about. What I'm talking about ..."" (yet he then goes back and edits my bold text without my permission or consent?) *And finally when I confronted this user they responded not with AGF attempt to resolve but: ""Buzz off"". So is this new wikipolicy? Honestly can I as an editor act the way BMK did here and have a 31 RS article deleted? "
| 0 |
ok ur gay ha ha ahhhhhhhhhhh ah ha ha wer u goin??? i
|
wish u wer dead!!! y do i hav 2 be oon report!!!!!!!!!!!!
| 1 |
" ::: I appreciate your candor, and and also value your experience. Although I created my original account in 2007, I've only been active in a regular fashion here since July 2013. I've read over some of Kudpung's work analyzing the RfA process, the pages of conversation on reform which seem to occur annually until 2013. I'm sure if I read over some of the proposals that were posted at the Village Pump and died a quiet death, I'd be even more depressed! ::: Change takes a lot of effort and coordinated (or semi-coordinated) action by a group of respected editors and admins. It also seems like there were years (2006-2008) when a lot of change happened and
|
policies created so it could be that, after 13 years, Wikipedia has become somewhat ossified and less flexible to the introduction of new ideas. I also know that there are fewer editors and they are spread thinly throughout the project. Just in the year I've been active, I see less participation at WP:AN/I than there was 6 months ago (which could be a bad or good thing!). With so much effort by admins and editors just to keep up with the backlog, it leaves less time and fewer people to discuss policy proposals (at least, until a crisis occurs). Good policy is not made by reacting to crises but sometimes it is the only way change happens. "
| 0 |
:::Benjamin K. Sovacool is perfectly entitled to his views, but he is working in the law department of Vermont, and has done a fair degree of legal advocacy against nuclear power/ he is a lawyer - http://www.vermontlaw.edu/Our_Faculty/Faculty_Directory/Benjamin_K_Sovacool.htm?child=x13226 and clearly anti-nuclear at that, having spent his time in India lawyering it up against nuclear power, and writing an anti-nuclear book with many unsubstantiated claims contained within, such as selectively quoting what MIT actually said. Science and Technology Studies is a social science, not a hard science. ::: Fundamentally, I ask, what are his science qualifications that would lead anyone to assume his opinion matters in respect to the field of Safety engineering? or even nuclear
|
engineering - Safety code (nuclear reactor), that warranted the previous editors pushing him into the lede of a safety article? ::: As I've said, I don't mind leaving him in the lede of the article as it stands now, as the selective quoting that he chose to reiterate in his anti-nuclear book naturally segues into what the MIT actually said, and a discussion on safety by actual qualified hard scientists in the field - MIT - who do have a modicum of authority to discuss nuclear safety. :::The article, IMHO, is more than fair at including the two anti-nuclear advocates statements, who you know, don't have any nuclear engineering qualifications at all. :::
| 0 |
" :Thanks for the advice. And good luck in trying to get an administrator to do anything sensible or appropriate about Eric's appalling behaviour. There is so much bullshit and hypocrisy going on with some of the administrators regarding Eric that it has become absurd and farcical. You may instead, like myself, find yourself receiving a rebuke from an administrator instead of Eric. One administrator has been ignoring Eric's repeated incivility to me and other editors while, in a bullying manner, blaming me and demanding that I withdraw a comment in response to his incivility to me. There is, of course, no way that I am going to withdraw
|
my comment in such circumstances. That really would be hypocritical on my part and rewarding bullies such as Eric. The administrator simply doesn't ""get it"" and is continuing to make disingenous comments about me whenever s/he has the opportunityy. Eric, meanwhile, seeks pity from other editors over my comment and has been suggesting, falsely and without any evidence whatsoever, of pretending to be a priest and also of being a sockpuppet of some former administrator. The whole situation is very bizarre. Wasn't there once a wise person who said something about seeing a speck in someone else's eye whilst ignoring the beam in your own? All the best. "
| 0 |
I didn't vandalize anything you idiot. Just because you
|
think some way, doesn't mean that's the case. Moron.
| 1 |
. And I wouldn't be annoying Peacemaker: he's
|
an sforovac.. he'll kick your ass )
| 1 |
:lol, well it certainly would be an example of
|
exhibitionism if somebody put their erect penis here!
| 1 |
IMHO sulfur looks stupid. And, my science teacher spells it
|
Sulphur, and she is always right ;-) so SULPHUR!
| 1 |
Significant contributions in at least one of the following Scientific contribution to theory and principles (whether correct or not) that were used as contemporary resources, building blocks, or influenced period thought, significant scientific or theoretical achievements with model aircraft; Designing any aircraft (pre-1910), or a distinct/innovative new design; Constructing a prototype aircraft (pre-1910); Manufacturing aircraft (including some direct or supervisory control over design) for commercial and/or military contracts (intended to represent founders of the aviation industry); Flying (Aviator) solo in an aircraft
|
and receiving a relevant flying certificate (pre-1910); or any significant national (e.g., a flight representing a country’s first) or international achievement, or flight award (initial record holders or demolishing existing records, but not simply breaking established records); Supporting aviation (e.g., positive publicity; personal, corporate and/or philanthropic sponsorship, education). The pre-1910 cutoff in designing, constructing, and flying is meant to make inclusion on the list more difficult, otherwise (as other editors have pointed out) this list would become unmanageable. Just a starting point...-
| 0 |
My thanks to Ron for his recent correspondence and my apologies to anyone at Wikipedia whose policies I may have violated in terms of self-promotion. It was not my intention to promote myself or any other family members, but to bring attention to facets of Richard Rose's life that the authors of this article intentionally chose to omit. The timeline, for example, gives a wonderful overview, with photos, of Richard Rose's life. I have been quite fortunate to receive supportive communication from those who have visited the Richard Rose Teachings site I put up to continue the work that I formerly did for many years under the auspices of the TAT Foundation that Richard created. Circumstances change, people
|
change. I also feel that I may have a unique perspective to offer having been both wife and student for almost 30 years. But this is not about me, and is neither here nor there in regards to the issue at hand. I have chosen not to make any further edits on the article page. The authors have done a fine job putting the article together and despite the subtle plugs which remain intact, I believe most people (as one party has already voiced) will see beyond that and glean what they can from the gems that Richard Rose left behind. It is truly a story worthy of Wikipedia's hosting. Of course, I'm prejudiced. Sincerely, Cecy Rose
| 0 |
" == Accuracy of Harper reference == You recently corrected a reference I included in the article (Harper et al., 2009) - thanks very much for this. I found this article using Google Scholar and used the ""cite"" function to copy and paste the in-line reference. The Google Scholar citation is - :Harper, G. S., Brownlee, A., Hall, T. E., Seymour, R., Lyons, R., & Ledwith, P. (2009). Global progress toward transgenic food animals: a survey of publicly available information. St. Lucia (Qld.): CSIRO Livestock Industries. Online verkrijgbaar van http://www. foodstandards. gov. au/_srcfiles/Transgenic% 20Livestock% 20Review% 20CSIRO% 20FI NAL% 2012Dec20031. pdf. Toegang verkregen op, 9. I
|
can understand why you changed the publisher as this is in the document, but I do not understand how you found the different publication date (2003 c.f. 2009). The date is particularly important because I would probably not have used the source if I had known it was 12 years old rather than 6! (If anyone wishes to delete the source because of this, I will not complain.) Please understand, I am not complaining here, I am simply trying to find out if other tools are out there for checking reference details, and perhaps we should be checking the details provided by Google Scholar.DrChrissy "
| 0 |
" ::::Theory: there's an emerging binary here, created on both sides between Arabs and Jews, or if you like Palestinians and Jews. I have no idea what you mean by an identity ""neither historically true nor universally common,"" and I think most students of nationalism would consider them socially constructed, often in opposition to other groups. That every binary opposition covers up people in an overlap is obvious, and Wikipedia should describe notable entities within these overlaps, including say, the Mizrahim. ::::Practice: The facts that come out of these distinctions have dominated life in Israel/Palestine since the Mandate period, and cannot be ignored. If
|
Palestinian refugee refers to non-Jewish Arab Palestinians (who have been treated differently by Israeli law as present absentees or as Arabs who cannot return to their homes), there are good historical reasons for that. That is the term is a product of a real history. Our job as editors is not to take apart verbal constructions to find missing components, but to provide encyclopedic content on entities described in reliable sources. ::::If there are reliable sources discussing Mizrahi refugees from East Jerusalem etc., consider writing about them in Jewish exodus from Arab and Muslim countries, and branch out if space becomes a problem. "
| 0 |
== World Champions == Hey Jersy: Whats up? Thanks for your kind words about my articles on my talk page. Im very flattered every time someone says something good about my articles. It says a lot about each of us responsible wikipedians as well, because I have learned from you and everyone else a lot of things about life and about writing just by reading wikipedia articles. Well, about the world champion boxers, its just that I was an amateur boxer myself when I was 12-14. I didnt make it, and let me assure you for everyone that wins a world title, there are , well not 1,500, but I can tell you none of the twenty five guys that trained at my gym ,and these included
|
two world ranked boxers, became a world champion, thats why I feel that the status world champion is a special one so thus should be put next to the boxer's name, just like Presidents are not merely mentioned as politicians next to their names. I'd guess the ratio is about 500/1 to 800/1 as far as the kids who fight as amateurs and those who go on to become professional world champions. BUT, I'd hate a revert war and furthermore, I'd hate to have you an enemy, as a mater of a fact I mean to become friends with everyone here if possible. So Im not gonna put world champion again unless for some reason I forget. Thanks for everything and God bless you! Sincerely yours, ''''
| 0 |
" LOL mitrebox is a rightwing fucking idiot. :I
|
never called you a ""rightwing fucking idiot"". "
| 1 |
There was no warthog like that in halo 2,
|
your a fucking retard. 22 July 2007 (UTC)
| 1 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.