instruction
stringlengths
1
84
input
stringlengths
1
85
output
stringlengths
1
83
legislative assembly or the legislative council, are appointed as
ministers. A person who is not a member of either House of the
state legislature can also be appointed as a minister. But, within
six months, he must become a member (either by election or by
nomination) of either House of the state legislature, otherwise, he
ceases to be a minister.
A minister who is a member of one House of the state
legislature has the right to speak and to take part in the
proceedings of the other House. But, he can vote only in the
OATH AND SALARY OF MINISTERS
Before a minister enters upon his office, the governor administers
to him the oaths of office and secrecy. In his oath of office, the
minister swears:
1. to bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of India,
2. to uphold the sovereignty and integrity of India,
3. to faithfully and conscientiously discharge the duties of his
office, and
4. to do right to all manner of people in accordance with the
Constitution and the law, without fear or favour, affection or
ill-will.
In his oath of secrecy, the minister swears that he will not
directly or indirectly communicate or reveal to any person(s) any
matter that is brought under his consideration or becomes known
to him as a state minister except as may be required for the due
discharge of his duties as such minister.
The salaries and allowances of ministers are determined by the
state legislature from time to time. A minister gets the salary and
allowances which are payable to a member of the state
legislature. Additionally, he gets a sumptuary allowance
(according to his rank), free accommodation, travelling allowance,
RESPONSIBILITY OF MINISTERS
Collective Responsibility
The fundamental principle underlying the working of parliamentary
system of government is the principle of collective responsibility.
Article 164 clearly states that the council of ministers is collectively
responsible to the legislative assembly of the state. This means
that all the ministers own joint responsibility to the legislative
assembly for all their acts of omission and commission. They work
as a team and swim or sink together. When the legislative
assembly passes a no-confidence motion against the council of
ministers, all the ministers have to resign including those ministers
who are from the legislative council2. Alternatively, the council of
ministers can advice the governor to dissolve the legislative
assembly on the ground that the House does not represent the
views of the electorate faithfully and call for fresh elections. The
governor may not oblige the council of ministers which has lost
the confidence of the legislative assembly.
The principle of collective responsibility also mean that the
cabinet decisions bind all cabinet ministers (and other ministers)
even if they deferred in the cabinet meeting. It is the duty of every
minister to stand by the cabinet decisions and support them both
within and outside the state legislature. If any minister disagrees
with a cabinet decision and is not prepared to defend it, he must
resign. Several ministers have resigned in the past owing to their
differences with the cabinet.
Individual Responsibility
Article 164 also contains the principle of individual responsibility. It
states that the ministers hold office during the pleasure of the
governor. This means that the governor can remove a minister at
a time when the council of ministers enjoys the confidence of the
legislative assembly. But, the governor can remove a minister only
on the advice of the chief minister. In case of difference of opinion
or dissatisfaction with the performance of a minister, the chief
minister can ask him to resign or advice the governor to dismiss
him. By exercising this power, the chief minister can ensure the
realisation of the rule of collective responsibility.
No Legal Responsibility
As at the Centre, there is no provision in the Constitution for the
system of legal responsibility of the minister in the states. It is not
required that an order of the governor for a public act should be
countersigned by a minister. Moreover, the courts are barred from
enquiring into the nature of advice rendered by the ministers to
COMPOSITION OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS
The Constitution does not specify the size of the state council of
ministers or the ranking of ministers. They are determined by the
chief minister according to the exigencies of the time and
requirements of the situation.
Like at the Centre, in the states too, the council of ministers
consists of three categories of ministers, namely, cabinet
ministers, ministers of state, and deputy ministers. The difference
between them lies in their respective ranks, emoluments, and
political importance. At the top of all these ministers stands the
chief minister–supreme governing authority in the state.
The cabinet ministers head the important departments of the
state government like home, education, finance, agriculture and
so forth3. They are members of the cabinet, attend its meetings
and play an important role in deciding policies. Thus, their
responsibilities extend over the entire gamut of state government.
The ministers of state can either be given independent charge
of departments or can be attached to cabinet ministers. However,
they are not members of the cabinet and do not attend the cabinet
meetings unless specially invited when something related to their
departments are considered by the cabinet.
Next in rank are the deputy ministers. They are not given
independent charge of departments. They are attached to the
cabinet ministers and assist them in their administrative, political
and parliamentary duties. They are not members of the cabinet
and do not attend cabinet meetings.
At times, the council of ministers may also include a deputy
CABINET
A smaller body called cabinet is the nucleus of the council of
ministers. It consists of only the cabinet ministers. It is the real
centre of authority in the state government. It performs the
following role:
1. It is the highest decisionmaking authority in the politico-
administrative system of a state.
2. It is the chief policy formulating body of the state
government.
3. It is the supreme executive authority of the state
government.
4. It is the chief coordinator of state administration.
5. It is an advisory body to the governor.
6. It is the chief crisis manager and thus deals with all
emergency situations.
7. It deals with all major legislative and financial matters.
8. It exercises control over higher appointments like
constitutional authorities and senior secretariat
administrators.
Cabinet Committees
The cabinet works through various committees called cabinet
committees. They are of two types–standing and ad hoc. The
former are of a permanent nature while the latter are of a
temporary nature.
They are set up by the chief minister according to the
exigencies of the time and requirements of the situation. Hence,
their number, nomenclature and composition varies from time to
time.
They not only sort out issues and formulate proposals for the
consideration of the cabinet but also take decisions. However, the
cabinet can review their decisions.
Table 32.1 Articles Related to State Council of Ministers at a
Glance
Article No. Subject Matter
163. Council of Ministers to aid and advise
Governor
164. Other provisions as to Ministers
166. Conduct of business of the Government of a
State
167. Duties of Chief Minister as respects the
furnishing of information to Governor, etc.
177. Rights of Ministers as respects the Houses
NOTES AND REFERENCES
1. They may, in addition, be in charge of the welfare of the
SCs and BCs or any other work.
2. Each minister need not resign separately; the
resignation of the chief minister amounts to the
resignation of the entire council of ministers.
3. The term ‘ministry’ or ‘ministries’ is used only in the
centre and not in the states. In other words, the state
government is divided into departments and not
33 State Legislature
T
he state legislature occupies a preeminent and central position
in the political system of a state.
Articles 168 to 212 in Part VI of the Constitution deal with the
organisation, composition, duration, officers, procedures, privileges,
ORGANISATION OF STATE LEGISLATURE
There is no uniformity in the organisation of state legislatures. Most of
the states have an unicameral system, while others have a bicameral
system. At present (2019), only six states have two Houses
(bicameral). These are Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Uttar Pradesh,
Bihar, Maharashtra and Karnataka. The Jammu and Kashmir
Legislative Council was abolishes by the Jammu and Kashmir
Reorganisation Act, 2019.1 The Tamil Nadu Legislative Council Act,
2010 has not come into force. The Legislative Council in Andhra
Pradesh was revived by the Andhra Pradesh Legislative Council Act,
2005. The 7th Amendment Act of 1956 provided for a Legislative
Council in Madhya Pradesh. However, a notification to this effect has
to be made by the President. So far, no such notification has been
made. Hence, Madhya Pradesh continues to have one House only.
The twenty-two states have unicameral system. Here, the state
legislature consists of the governor and the legislative assembly. In
the states having bicameral system, the state legislature consists of
the governor, the legislative council and the legislative assembly. The
legislative council (Vidhan Parishad) is the upper house (second
chamber or house of elders), while the legislative assembly (Vidhan
Sabha) is the lower house (first chamber or popular house).
The Constitution provides for the abolition or creation of legislative
councils in states. Accordingly, the Parliament can abolish a legislative
council (where it already exists) or create it (where it does not exist), if
the legislative assembly of the concerned state passes a resolution to
that effect. Such a specific resolution must be passed by the state
assembly by a special majority, that is, a majority of the total
membership of the assembly and a majority of not less than two-thirds
of the members of the assembly present and voting. This Act of
Parliament is not to be deemed as an amendment of the Constitution
for the purposes of Article 368 and is passed like an ordinary piece of
legislation (ie, by simple majority).
“The idea of having a second chamber in the states was criticised
in the Constituent Assembly on the ground that it was not
representative of the people, that it delayed legislative process and
that it was an expensive institution2 .” Consequently the provision was
willingness and financial strength. For example, Andhra Pradesh got
the legislative council created in 1957 and got the same abolished in
1985. The Legislative Council in Andhra Pradesh was again revived in
2007, after the enactment of the Andhra Pradesh Legislative Council
Act, 2005. The legislative council of Tamil Nadu had been abolished in
1986 and that of Punjab and West Bengal in 1969.
In 2010, the Legislative Assembly of Tamil Nadu passed a
resolution for the revival of the Legislative Council in the state.
Accordingly, the Parliament enacted the Tamil Nadu Legislative
Council Act, 2010 which provided for the creation of Legislative
Council in the state. However, before this Act was enforced, the
Legislative Assembly of Tamil Nadu passed another resolution in 2011
COMPOSITION OF TWO HOUSES
Composition of Assembly
Strength
The legislative assembly consists of representatives directly elected
by the people on the basis of universal adult franchise. Its maximum
strength is fixed at 500 and minimum strength at 60. It means that its
strength varies from 60 to 500 depending on the population size of the
state3. However, in case of Arunachal Pradesh, Sikkim and Goa, the
minimum number is fixed at 30 and in case of Mizoram and Nagaland,
it is 40 and 46 respectively. Further, some members of the legislative
assemblies in Sikkim and Nagaland are also elected indirectly.
Nominated Member
The governor can nominate one member from the Anglo-Indian
community, if the community is not adequately represented in the
assembly.4 Originally, this provision was to operate for ten years (ie,
upto 1960). But this duration has been extended continuously since
then by 10 years each time. Now, under the 95th Amendment Act of
2009, this is to last until 2020.
Territorial Constituencies
For the purpose of holding direct elections to the assembly, each state
is divided into territorial constituencies. The demarcation of these
constituencies is done in such a manner that the ratio between the
population of each constituency and the number of seats allotted to it
isthe same throughout the state. In other words, the Constitution
ensures that there is uniformity of representation between different
constituencies in the state. The expression ‘population’ means, the
population as ascertained at the last preceding census of which the
relevant figures have been published.
Readjustment after each census
After each census, a readjustment is to be made in the (a) total
number of seats in the assembly of each state and (b) the division of
each state into territorial constituencies. The Parliament is empowered
to determine the authority and the manner in which it is to be made.
Accordingly, Parliament has enacted the Delimitation Commission
Acts in 1952, 1962, 1972 and 2002 for this purpose.
The 42nd Amendment Act of 1976 had frozen total number of seats
in the assembly of each state and the division of such state into
territorial constituencies till the year 2000 at the 1971 level. This ban
on readjustment has been extended for another years (i.e., upto year
2026) by the 84th Amendment Act of 2001 with the same objective of
encouraging population limiting measures.
The 84th Amendment Act of 2001 also empowered the government
to undertake readjustment and rationalisation of territorial
constituencies in a state on the basis of the population figures of 1991
census. Later, the 87th Amendment Act of 2003 provided for the
delimitation of constituencies on the basis of 2001 census and not
1991 census. However, this can be done without altering the total
number of seats in the assembly of each state.
Reservation of seats for SCs and STs
The Constitution provided for the reservation of seats for scheduled
castes and scheduled tribes in the assembly of each state on the
basis of population ratios.5
Originally, this reservation was to operate for ten years (i.e., up to
1960). But this duration has been extended continuously since then by
10 years each time. Now, under the 95th Amendment Act of 2009, this
reservation is to last until 2020.
Composition of Council
Strength
Unlike the members of the legislative assembly, the members of the
legislative council are indirectly elected. The maximum strength of the
council is fixed at one-third of the total strength of the assembly and
the minimum strength is fixed at 406. It means that the size of the
council depends on the size of the assembly of the concerned state.
This is done to ensure the predominance of the directly elected House
(assembly) in the legislative affairs of the state. Though the
Constitution has fixed the maximum and the minimum limits, the
actual strength of a Council is fixed by Parliament7 .
Manner of Election
Of the total number of members of a legislative council:
1. 1/3 are elected by the members of local bodies in the state like
municipalities, district boards, etc.,
2. 1/12 are elected by graduates of three years standing and
residing within the state,
3. 1/12 are elected by teachers of three years standing in the state,
not lower in standard than secondary school,
4. 1/3 are elected by the members of the legislative assembly of
the state from amongst persons who are not members of the
assembly, and
5. the remainder are nominated by the governor from amongst
persons who have a special knowledge or practical experience
of literature, science, art, cooperative movement and social
service.
Thus, 5/6 of the total number of members of a legislative council
are indirectly elected and 1/6 are nominated by the governor. The
members are elected in accordance with the system of proportional
representation by means of a single transferable vote. The bonafide or
propriety of the governor’s nomination in any case cannot be
challenged in the courts.
This scheme of composition of a legislative council as laid down in
the Constitution is tentative and not final. The Parliament is authorised
DURATION OF TWO HOUSES
Duration of Assembly
Like the Lok Sabha, the legislative assembly is not a continuing
chamber. Its normal term is five years from the date of its first meeting
after the general elections8. The expiration of the period of five years
operates as automatic dissolution of the assembly. However, the