Unnamed: 0
int64 0
3.03k
| text
stringlengths 89
1.72k
|
|---|---|
2,900 |
<s>[INST] I guess I don’t understand why we [/INST] would not be confident in that. So let me just say March 18, 2008107 of 127 that I don’t think this is easy. Like many of you, I think that it would be great if we got away with 50, but I think that is not tenable—not even close in this context. </s>
|
2,901 |
<s>[INST] But I think we have to be confident that, if we end up being successful in averting the risk of a very, very dangerous, damaging spiral in the financial markets with the consequences of a very deep recession or a deeper recessi on than in the early 1990s, then we will be able to deal with the likel y consequences that we will have more inflation and less moderation than we now anticipate. I guess I don’t understand why we [/INST] would not be confident in that. So let me just say March 18, 2008107 of 127 that I don’t think this is easy. </s>
|
2,902 |
<s>[INST] So let me just say March 18, 2008107 of [/INST] 127 that I don’t think this is easy. Like many of you, I think that it would be great if we got away with 50, but I think that is not tenable—not even close in this context. Even though it would be nice if we had a consensus in the United States about a set of fiscal measures that we think would be good on the merits, we can’t make monetary policy in a framework where we condition our actions on actions by the Congress. </s>
|
2,903 |
<s>[INST] I guess I don’t understand why we would not be confident in that. So let me just say March 18, 2008107 of [/INST] 127 that I don’t think this is easy. Like many of you, I think that it would be great if we got away with 50, but I think that is not tenable—not even close in this context. </s>
|
2,904 |
<s>[INST] Like many of you, I think that it would be great if we got away [/INST] with 50, but I think that is not tenable—not even close in this context. Even though it would be nice if we had a consensus in the United States about a set of fiscal measures that we think would be good on the merits, we can’t make monetary policy in a framework where we condition our actions on actions by the Congress. In an environment like this, it is not possible. </s>
|
2,905 |
<s>[INST] So let me just say March 18, 2008107 of 127 that I don’t think this is easy. Like many of you, I think that it would be great if we got away [/INST] with 50, but I think that is not tenable—not even close in this context. Even though it would be nice if we had a consensus in the United States about a set of fiscal measures that we think would be good on the merits, we can’t make monetary policy in a framework where we condition our actions on actions by the Congress. </s>
|
2,906 |
<s>[INST] Even though it would be nice if we had a consensus in the United States about a set of fiscal measures that we think would [/INST] be good on the merits, we can’t make monetary policy in a framework where we condition our actions on actions by the Congress. In an environment like this, it is not possible. If we do the right thing, does that mean it ta kes the pressure off them? </s>
|
2,907 |
<s>[INST] Like many of you, I think that it would be great if we got away with 50, but I think that is not tenable—not even close in this context. Even though it would be nice if we had a consensus in the United States about a set of fiscal measures that we think would [/INST] be good on the merits, we can’t make monetary policy in a framework where we condition our actions on actions by the Congress. In an environment like this, it is not possible. </s>
|
2,908 |
<s>[INST] If we do the right thing, does that mean [/INST] it ta kes the pressure off them? Maybe , but probably not so much. But it can’t constrain us from doing what is appropriate now. </s>
|
2,909 |
<s>[INST] In an environment like this, it is not possible. If we do the right thing, does that mean [/INST] it ta kes the pressure off them? Maybe , but probably not so much. </s>
|
2,910 |
<s>[INST] But it can’t constrain us from [/INST] doing what is appropriate now. Just one final thing : People who know this stuff quite well, who are reasonably calm people, say, “This is possibly the worst finan cial crisis in 50 years, and the most challenging set of pressure s facing the central bank in 20 or 30 years ”. Think about that in this context. </s>
|
2,911 |
<s>[INST] Maybe , but probably not so much. But it can’t constrain us from [/INST] doing what is appropriate now. Just one final thing : People who know this stuff quite well, who are reasonably calm people, say, “This is possibly the worst finan cial crisis in 50 years, and the most challenging set of pressure s facing the central bank in 20 or 30 years ”. </s>
|
2,912 |
<s>[INST] Just one final thing : People who know this stuff quite well, who are reasonably calm people, say, “This is possibly the worst finan [/INST] cial crisis in 50 years, and the most challenging set of pressure s facing the central bank in 20 or 30 years ”. Think about that in this context. Okay? </s>
|
2,913 |
<s>[INST] But it can’t constrain us from doing what is appropriate now. Just one final thing : People who know this stuff quite well, who are reasonably calm people, say, “This is possibly the worst finan [/INST] cial crisis in 50 years, and the most challenging set of pressure s facing the central bank in 20 or 30 years ”. Think about that in this context. </s>
|
2,914 |
<s>[INST] It is no surprise that we disagree; it is n o surprise that the range of agreement about [/INST] what we see and what we should do is going to be wide in that context. But just think very carefully about the signal it sends to the world at this moment to be explicit in public about the degree of dispersion about our views. Just think carefully about it because this is a special moment. </s>
|
2,915 |
<s>[INST] Okay? It is no surprise that we disagree; it is n o surprise that the range of agreement about [/INST] what we see and what we should do is going to be wide in that context. But just think very carefully about the signal it sends to the world at this moment to be explicit in public about the degree of dispersion about our views. </s>
|
2,916 |
<s>[INST] But just think very carefully about the signal it sends to the world at this [/INST] moment to be explicit in public about the degree of dispersion about our views. Just think carefully about it because this is a special moment. I fully support the language and the action in alternative A. President Fisher, I would not amend the last sentence to say “without sacrificing” partly because I think we need to project confidence in our capacity to manage long- term inflation outcomes. </s>
|
2,917 |
<s>[INST] It is no surprise that we disagree; it is n o surprise that the range of agreement about what we see and what we should do is going to be wide in that context. But just think very carefully about the signal it sends to the world at this [/INST] moment to be explicit in public about the degree of dispersion about our views. Just think carefully about it because this is a special moment. </s>
|
2,918 |
<s>[INST] Just think carefully about it because [/INST] this is a special moment. I fully support the language and the action in alternative A. President Fisher, I would not amend the last sentence to say “without sacrificing” partly because I think we need to project confidence in our capacity to manage long- term inflation outcomes. I am ambivalent, as you know, Mr. Chairman, about that clause that President Fisher suggested we delete about reflecting a projected leveling out. </s>
|
2,919 |
<s>[INST] But just think very carefully about the signal it sends to the world at this moment to be explicit in public about the degree of dispersion about our views. Just think carefully about it because [/INST] this is a special moment. I fully support the language and the action in alternative A. President Fisher, I would not amend the last sentence to say “without sacrificing” partly because I think we need to project confidence in our capacity to manage long- term inflation outcomes. </s>
|
2,920 |
<s>[INST] I fully support the language and the action in alternative A. President Fisher, I would not amend the last sentence to say [/INST] “without sacrificing” partly because I think we need to project confidence in our capacity to manage long- term inflation outcomes. I am ambivalent, as you know, Mr. Chairman, about that clause that President Fisher suggested we delete about reflecting a projected leveling out. The virtue is that it explains and underpins, therefore, the basis for a medium- term forecast. </s>
|
2,921 |
<s>[INST] Just think carefully about it because this is a special moment. I fully support the language and the action in alternative A. President Fisher, I would not amend the last sentence to say [/INST] “without sacrificing” partly because I think we need to project confidence in our capacity to manage long- term inflation outcomes. I am ambivalent, as you know, Mr. Chairman, about that clause that President Fisher suggested we delete about reflecting a projected leveling out. </s>
|
2,922 |
<s>[INST] I am ambivalent, as you know, Mr. Chairman, about that clause that [/INST] President Fisher suggested we delete about reflecting a projected leveling out. The virtue is that it explains and underpins, therefore, the basis for a medium- term forecast. The vice in it is that, as the Chairman himself said, the firs t part may seem like a thin reed on which to base our forecast, given what has been happening. </s>
|
2,923 |
<s>[INST] I fully support the language and the action in alternative A. President Fisher, I would not amend the last sentence to say “without sacrificing” partly because I think we need to project confidence in our capacity to manage long- term inflation outcomes. I am ambivalent, as you know, Mr. Chairman, about that clause that [/INST] President Fisher suggested we delete about reflecting a projected leveling out. The virtue is that it explains and underpins, therefore, the basis for a medium- term forecast. </s>
|
2,924 |
<s>[INST] The virtue is that it explains and underpins, therefore, [/INST] the basis for a medium- term forecast. The vice in it is that, as the Chairman himself said, the firs t part may seem like a thin reed on which to base our forecast, given what has been happening. I actually think, Governor Mishkin, that acknowledging some indicators of inflation expectations —it is really about uncertainty having increased —is helpful to our credibility. </s>
|
2,925 |
<s>[INST] I am ambivalent, as you know, Mr. Chairman, about that clause that President Fisher suggested we delete about reflecting a projected leveling out. The virtue is that it explains and underpins, therefore, [/INST] the basis for a medium- term forecast. The vice in it is that, as the Chairman himself said, the firs t part may seem like a thin reed on which to base our forecast, given what has been happening. </s>
|
2,926 |
<s>[INST] The vice in it is that, as the Chairman himself said, the firs t part may seem [/INST] like a thin reed on which to base our forecast, given what has been happening. I actually think, Governor Mishkin, that acknowledging some indicators of inflation expectations —it is really about uncertainty having increased —is helpful to our credibility. At the margin, it helps, March 18, 2008108 of 127 even though, sure, you can say that we really can’t know what they are telling us about the market. </s>
|
2,927 |
<s>[INST] The virtue is that it explains and underpins, therefore, the basis for a medium- term forecast. The vice in it is that, as the Chairman himself said, the firs t part may seem [/INST] like a thin reed on which to base our forecast, given what has been happening. I actually think, Governor Mishkin, that acknowledging some indicators of inflation expectations —it is really about uncertainty having increased —is helpful to our credibility. </s>
|
2,928 |
<s>[INST] I actually think, Governor Mishkin, that acknowledging some indicators of inflation expectations —it [/INST] is really about uncertainty having increased —is helpful to our credibility. At the margin, it helps, March 18, 2008108 of 127 even though, sure, you can say that we really can’t know what they are telling us about the market. MR. </s>
|
2,929 |
<s>[INST] The vice in it is that, as the Chairman himself said, the firs t part may seem like a thin reed on which to base our forecast, given what has been happening. I actually think, Governor Mishkin, that acknowledging some indicators of inflation expectations —it [/INST] is really about uncertainty having increased —is helpful to our credibility. At the margin, it helps, March 18, 2008108 of 127 even though, sure, you can say that we really can’t know what they are telling us about the market. </s>
|
2,930 |
<s>[INST] At the margin, it helps, March 18, 2008108 of 127 even though, sure, you can [/INST] say that we really can’t know what they are telling us about the market. MR. MISHKIN. </s>
|
2,931 |
<s>[INST] I actually think, Governor Mishkin, that acknowledging some indicators of inflation expectations —it is really about uncertainty having increased —is helpful to our credibility. At the margin, it helps, March 18, 2008108 of 127 even though, sure, you can [/INST] say that we really can’t know what they are telling us about the market. MR. </s>
|
2,932 |
<s>[INST] It is just a question of how the markets—and I am not as good at this as the people who really follow the [/INST] markets—and the press will react to this phrase because I think that the amount of movement here is still very small. You know, the kinds of numbers we are talking about for inflation expectation s are on the order of 10 to 20 basis points. W ill this mention, because it is new, raise a flag that will get more attention and more concern than, in fact, is justified? </s>
|
2,933 |
<s>[INST] I do think that inflation expectations are a concern. It is just a question of how the markets—and I am not as good at this as the people who really follow the [/INST] markets—and the press will react to this phrase because I think that the amount of movement here is still very small. You know, the kinds of numbers we are talking about for inflation expectation s are on the order of 10 to 20 basis points. </s>
|
2,934 |
<s>[INST] You know, the kinds of numbers we are talking about for inflation expectation [/INST] s are on the order of 10 to 20 basis points. W ill this mention, because it is new, raise a flag that will get more attention and more concern than, in fact, is justified? T hat is the tricky problem here. </s>
|
2,935 |
<s>[INST] It is just a question of how the markets—and I am not as good at this as the people who really follow the markets—and the press will react to this phrase because I think that the amount of movement here is still very small. You know, the kinds of numbers we are talking about for inflation expectation [/INST] s are on the order of 10 to 20 basis points. W ill this mention, because it is new, raise a flag that will get more attention and more concern than, in fact, is justified? </s>
|
2,936 |
<s>[INST] W ill this mention, because it is new, raise a flag that will [/INST] get more attention and more concern than, in fact, is justified? T hat is the tricky problem here. We should acknowledge it, but again, I am not good enough at wordsmithing to figure out how to do that. </s>
|
2,937 |
<s>[INST] You know, the kinds of numbers we are talking about for inflation expectation s are on the order of 10 to 20 basis points. W ill this mention, because it is new, raise a flag that will [/INST] get more attention and more concern than, in fact, is justified? T hat is the tricky problem here. </s>
|
2,938 |
<s>[INST] We should acknowledge it, but again, I am not good enough [/INST] at wordsmithing to figure out how to do that. This is a bit of my concern here. I don’t know if anybody has any thoughts about how to h andle it. </s>
|
2,939 |
<s>[INST] T hat is the tricky problem here. We should acknowledge it, but again, I am not good enough [/INST] at wordsmithing to figure out how to do that. This is a bit of my concern here. </s>
|
2,940 |
<s>[INST] I don’t know if anybody has any thoughts [/INST] about how to h andle it. CHAIRMAN BERNANKE. President Fisher, I think I agree on the last sentence. </s>
|
2,941 |
<s>[INST] This is a bit of my concern here. I don’t know if anybody has any thoughts [/INST] about how to h andle it. CHAIRMAN BERNANKE. </s>
|
2,942 |
<s>[INST] I would like to keep it something that we have used frequently before [/INST] and that emphasizes, in fact, the symmetry of the dual mandate. Are there other thoughts on either the indicators of inflation expectations or the list of reasons that anyone would prefer to change from where we are? MR. </s>
|
2,943 |
<s>[INST] President Fisher, I think I agree on the last sentence. I would like to keep it something that we have used frequently before [/INST] and that emphasizes, in fact, the symmetry of the dual mandate. Are there other thoughts on either the indicators of inflation expectations or the list of reasons that anyone would prefer to change from where we are? </s>
|
2,944 |
<s>[INST] Are there other thoughts on either the indicators of inflation expectations or the list [/INST] of reasons that anyone would prefer to change from where we are? MR. KOHN. </s>
|
2,945 |
<s>[INST] I would like to keep it something that we have used frequently before and that emphasizes, in fact, the symmetry of the dual mandate. Are there other thoughts on either the indicators of inflation expectations or the list [/INST] of reasons that anyone would prefer to change from where we are? MR. </s>
|
2,946 |
<s>[INST] On inflation expectations, because they haven’t risen very [/INST] much, I agree with President Geithner. I like the fact that we tell people we are aware, but we could say “have edged higher” or something like that instead of “risen ”. MR. </s>
|
2,947 |
<s>[INST] KOHN. On inflation expectations, because they haven’t risen very [/INST] much, I agree with President Geithner. I like the fact that we tell people we are aware, but we could say “have edged higher” or something like that instead of “risen ”. </s>
|
2,948 |
<s>[INST] I like the fact that we tell people we are aware, but we could [/INST] say “have edged higher” or something like that instead of “risen ”. MR. MISHKIN . </s>
|
2,949 |
<s>[INST] On inflation expectations, because they haven’t risen very much, I agree with President Geithner. I like the fact that we tell people we are aware, but we could [/INST] say “have edged higher” or something like that instead of “risen ”. MR. </s>
|
2,950 |
<s>[INST] We could use my “smidgen” word, [/INST] but “edged higher” is better. MR. KOHN. </s>
|
2,951 |
<s>[INST] MISHKIN . We could use my “smidgen” word, [/INST] but “edged higher” is better. MR. </s>
|
2,952 |
<s>[INST] I think an issue with “edged higher” is that it really does [/INST] sound as though you have some very specific measures in mind. CHAIRMAN BERNANKE. Brian, do you have a thought on “risen” versus “risen somewhat” versus taking it out? </s>
|
2,953 |
<s>[INST] MADIGAN. I think an issue with “edged higher” is that it really does [/INST] sound as though you have some very specific measures in mind. CHAIRMAN BERNANKE. </s>
|
2,954 |
<s>[INST] Brian, do you have a thought on “risen” [/INST] versus “risen somewhat” versus taking it out? MR. MADIGAN. </s>
|
2,955 |
<s>[INST] CHAIRMAN BERNANKE. Brian, do you have a thought on “risen” [/INST] versus “risen somewhat” versus taking it out? MR. </s>
|
2,956 |
<s>[INST] I think if you take it out that very much raises the question of what to [/INST] do with that language in red about the factors that would push inflation down. It would be tough to drop the inflation expectations thought and not have inflation expectations mentioned anywhere in the paragraph . There would just be vacant space where you had, at least in previous minutes, referred to it. </s>
|
2,957 |
<s>[INST] MADIGAN. I think if you take it out that very much raises the question of what to [/INST] do with that language in red about the factors that would push inflation down. It would be tough to drop the inflation expectations thought and not have inflation expectations mentioned anywhere in the paragraph . </s>
|
2,958 |
<s>[INST] It would be tough to drop the inflation expectations thought and [/INST] not have inflation expectations mentioned anywhere in the paragraph . There would just be vacant space where you had, at least in previous minutes, referred to it. CHAIRMAN BERNANKE. </s>
|
2,959 |
<s>[INST] I think if you take it out that very much raises the question of what to do with that language in red about the factors that would push inflation down. It would be tough to drop the inflation expectations thought and [/INST] not have inflation expectations mentioned anywhere in the paragraph . There would just be vacant space where you had, at least in previous minutes, referred to it. </s>
|
2,960 |
<s>[INST] There would just be vacant space where you had, [/INST] at least in previous minutes, referred to it. CHAIRMAN BERNANKE. Anyone else? </s>
|
2,961 |
<s>[INST] It would be tough to drop the inflation expectations thought and not have inflation expectations mentioned anywhere in the paragraph . There would just be vacant space where you had, [/INST] at least in previous minutes, referred to it. CHAIRMAN BERNANKE. </s>
|
2,962 |
<s>[INST] Adding just the word “slightly”—“ risen [/INST] slightly” —gets to your point. MR. MISHKIN. </s>
|
2,963 |
<s>[INST] DUDLEY. Adding just the word “slightly”—“ risen [/INST] slightly” —gets to your point. MR. </s>
|
2,964 |
<s>[INST] Brian, does “somewhat” mitigate it a little, [/INST] or does that highlight it? MR. MADIGAN. </s>
|
2,965 |
<s>[INST] WARSH. Brian, does “somewhat” mitigate it a little, [/INST] or does that highlight it? MR. </s>
|
2,966 |
<s>[INST] Mr. Chairman, if I understand the discussion about this, when you say “some indicators have [/INST] risen somewhat,” you are getting into territory that seems sort of mealy -mouthed. CHAIRMAN BERNANKE. Right. </s>
|
2,967 |
<s>[INST] LOCKHART. Mr. Chairman, if I understand the discussion about this, when you say “some indicators have [/INST] risen somewhat,” you are getting into territory that seems sort of mealy -mouthed. CHAIRMAN BERNANKE. </s>
|
2,968 |
<s>[INST] Mr. Chairman, I don’t want to prolong this too much, but in response to the [/INST] Vice Chairman’s comments, I am not sure I follow what you are saying. I think the model that you showed us, in terms of whe re the equilibrium rate is , is a short- term model. It is based upon a variety of estimates and output gaps, and I think there is plenty of room for disagreement around that model. </s>
|
2,969 |
<s>[INST] HOENIG. Mr. Chairman, I don’t want to prolong this too much, but in response to the [/INST] Vice Chairman’s comments, I am not sure I follow what you are saying. I think the model that you showed us, in terms of whe re the equilibrium rate is , is a short- term model. </s>
|
2,970 |
<s>[INST] I think the model that you showed us, in terms of whe [/INST] re the equilibrium rate is , is a short- term model. It is based upon a variety of estimates and output gaps, and I think there is plenty of room for disagreement around that model. S o the fact that we have different views on this Committee is very healthy . </s>
|
2,971 |
<s>[INST] Mr. Chairman, I don’t want to prolong this too much, but in response to the Vice Chairman’s comments, I am not sure I follow what you are saying. I think the model that you showed us, in terms of whe [/INST] re the equilibrium rate is , is a short- term model. It is based upon a variety of estimates and output gaps, and I think there is plenty of room for disagreement around that model. </s>
|
2,972 |
<s>[INST] It is based upon a variety of estimates and output gaps, and I [/INST] think there is plenty of room for disagreement around that model. S o the fact that we have different views on this Committee is very healthy . Even to the world it can be very healthy because a lot of people out there have a different view of this and are wondering if there is any variance of views within this Committee . </s>
|
2,973 |
<s>[INST] I think the model that you showed us, in terms of whe re the equilibrium rate is , is a short- term model. It is based upon a variety of estimates and output gaps, and I [/INST] think there is plenty of room for disagreement around that model. S o the fact that we have different views on this Committee is very healthy . </s>
|
2,974 |
<s>[INST] S o the fact that we have different views [/INST] on this Committee is very healthy . Even to the world it can be very healthy because a lot of people out there have a different view of this and are wondering if there is any variance of views within this Committee . I think that can serve as useful a purpose as uniformity without objection. </s>
|
2,975 |
<s>[INST] It is based upon a variety of estimates and output gaps, and I think there is plenty of room for disagreement around that model. S o the fact that we have different views [/INST] on this Committee is very healthy . Even to the world it can be very healthy because a lot of people out there have a different view of this and are wondering if there is any variance of views within this Committee . </s>
|
2,976 |
<s>[INST] Even to the world it can be very healthy because a lot of people out there have a different [/INST] view of this and are wondering if there is any variance of views within this Committee . I think that can serve as useful a purpose as uniformity without objection. VICE CHAIRMAN GEITHNER . </s>
|
2,977 |
<s>[INST] S o the fact that we have different views on this Committee is very healthy . Even to the world it can be very healthy because a lot of people out there have a different [/INST] view of this and are wondering if there is any variance of views within this Committee . I think that can serve as useful a purpose as uniformity without objection. </s>
|
2,978 |
<s>[INST] I think that can serve as useful [/INST] a purpose as uniformity without objection. VICE CHAIRMAN GEITHNER . Let me say for the record that I agree with everything you just said. </s>
|
2,979 |
<s>[INST] Even to the world it can be very healthy because a lot of people out there have a different view of this and are wondering if there is any variance of views within this Committee . I think that can serve as useful [/INST] a purpose as uniformity without objection. VICE CHAIRMAN GEITHNER . </s>
|
2,980 |
<s>[INST] Let me say for the record that I [/INST] agree with everything you just said. My only point is that there is no surprise that we disagree or that it is complicated and we have a different view of the balance. If anything, what this chart shows is how broad the range of uncertainty is around this. </s>
|
2,981 |
<s>[INST] VICE CHAIRMAN GEITHNER . Let me say for the record that I [/INST] agree with everything you just said. My only point is that there is no surprise that we disagree or that it is complicated and we have a different view of the balance. </s>
|
2,982 |
<s>[INST] My only point is that there is no surprise that we disagree or that [/INST] it is complicated and we have a different view of the balance. If anything, what this chart shows is how broad the range of uncertainty is around this. That was part of my point in saying it. </s>
|
2,983 |
<s>[INST] Let me say for the record that I agree with everything you just said. My only point is that there is no surprise that we disagree or that [/INST] it is complicated and we have a different view of the balance. If anything, what this chart shows is how broad the range of uncertainty is around this. </s>
|
2,984 |
<s>[INST] If anything, what this chart shows is how broad [/INST] the range of uncertainty is around this. That was part of my point in saying it. But I do think that the value of the public display of dispersion is different when you have this degree of a confidence problem in markets generally . </s>
|
2,985 |
<s>[INST] My only point is that there is no surprise that we disagree or that it is complicated and we have a different view of the balance. If anything, what this chart shows is how broad [/INST] the range of uncertainty is around this. That was part of my point in saying it. </s>
|
2,986 |
<s>[INST] But I do think that the value of the public display of dispersion is different [/INST] when you have this degree of a confidence problem in markets generally . That is the only thing I was suggesting. I completely agree about the value of diversity of view in this context. </s>
|
2,987 |
<s>[INST] That was part of my point in saying it. But I do think that the value of the public display of dispersion is different [/INST] when you have this degree of a confidence problem in markets generally . That is the only thing I was suggesting. </s>
|
2,988 |
<s>[INST] I completely agree about the value of [/INST] diversity of view in this context. It is n o surprise that we disagree in this period. My only suggestion is in terms of how we think about talking about it publicly, given that we are at such a delicate moment. </s>
|
2,989 |
<s>[INST] That is the only thing I was suggesting. I completely agree about the value of [/INST] diversity of view in this context. It is n o surprise that we disagree in this period. </s>
|
2,990 |
<s>[INST] It is n o surprise that [/INST] we disagree in this period. My only suggestion is in terms of how we think about talking about it publicly, given that we are at such a delicate moment. MR. </s>
|
2,991 |
<s>[INST] I completely agree about the value of diversity of view in this context. It is n o surprise that [/INST] we disagree in this period. My only suggestion is in terms of how we think about talking about it publicly, given that we are at such a delicate moment. </s>
|
2,992 |
<s>[INST] My only suggestion is in terms of how we think about talking about [/INST] it publicly, given that we are at such a delicate moment. MR. HOENIG. </s>
|
2,993 |
<s>[INST] It is n o surprise that we disagree in this period. My only suggestion is in terms of how we think about talking about [/INST] it publicly, given that we are at such a delicate moment. MR. </s>
|
2,994 |
<s>[INST] Vice Chairman, we have a bubble developing [/INST] in some parts of our area. I think they are aware of that, and so I think we have to be mindful of that in our discussion more broadly. T hat is why I think th ere are important differences that we should necessarily be able to—and should in fact—acknowledge publicly. </s>
|
2,995 |
<s>[INST] HOENIG. Vice Chairman, we have a bubble developing [/INST] in some parts of our area. I think they are aware of that, and so I think we have to be mindful of that in our discussion more broadly. </s>
|
2,996 |
<s>[INST] I think they are aware of that, and so I think we [/INST] have to be mindful of that in our discussion more broadly. T hat is why I think th ere are important differences that we should necessarily be able to—and should in fact—acknowledge publicly. March 18, 2008111 of 127 CHAIRMAN BERNANKE. </s>
|
2,997 |
<s>[INST] Vice Chairman, we have a bubble developing in some parts of our area. I think they are aware of that, and so I think we [/INST] have to be mindful of that in our discussion more broadly. T hat is why I think th ere are important differences that we should necessarily be able to—and should in fact—acknowledge publicly. </s>
|
2,998 |
<s>[INST] T hat is why I think th ere are important differences that [/INST] we should necessarily be able to—and should in fact—acknowledge publicly. March 18, 2008111 of 127 CHAIRMAN BERNANKE. Okay. </s>
|
2,999 |
<s>[INST] I think they are aware of that, and so I think we have to be mindful of that in our discussion more broadly. T hat is why I think th ere are important differences that [/INST] we should necessarily be able to—and should in fact—acknowledge publicly. March 18, 2008111 of 127 CHAIRMAN BERNANKE. </s>
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.