text
stringlengths
21
583k
url
stringlengths
19
4.87k
AVG antivirus security software is however a superb pick for the protection of your PC. Usually the antivirus can wipe out the majority of the selections on look, and identify some of the rest of the ones whenever we attempt to launch them. FSecure AntiVirus is not really difficult to mount and quite simple slow down your computer. Anti virus comes in two distinct varieties that are Totally free and Paid. Just simply keep in mind that ant-virus is just one of the usual computer secureness practices you ought to be following. Avast Free Anti-virus is a full-featured item, considering the exact same antivirus and anti-spyware scanning engine Eset NOD32 Software Review Eset Nod… – Eset Nod32 Username and Password keys used in our advanced solutions. Antivirus has changed into a simple necessity, to continue in order to keep computer protect from viruses. Your anti virus should definitely have the capacity to origin out existing malware, but its continuing activity is to avoid ransomware, botnets, Trojans, and other forms of bad programs from shopping a establishment. Thus, you may trust the antivirus with no worry. Avast antivirus continues to be the ideal antivirus security software’s out there. Avast Absolutely free Antivirus took the top area due to a variety of wonderful test out outcome and built-in capacities. Spyware can be described as particular kind of software which can be intended to gain access to your passwords and some other important info. Following the malware’s eradicated, they don’t have any additional use, since they provide no maintaining protection. Take a look at our document on the signs and symptoms you’ve got adware and spyware. The Supreme Approach for Best Windows 10 Antivirus For the first time, it includes the feature where you can protect your home network products, like routers and cellular devices, right from hacker problems. You may also update to internet secureness feature if you wish more security. Aside from supplying you with super antivirus and the anti-malware installer, in addition , that supplies you with a many more additional protection features. The 2017 cost free version features Zen applications that make it easy for you to watch status of all of the devices jogging the program. The newest adaptation of Ad-Aware free ant-virus makes it possible for users to experience straightforward security. Additionally , there isn’t a Pro edition of the important antivirus. Bitdefender Antivirus Free Edition can be popular due to its quick and straightforward installation and in addition supplies good malware hindering. It is well suited for home use, as it does not burden the system with unnecessary processes while providing a dangerous of protection. When you install the software, it is going to request that you just earn a whole check. Additionally when going through the true net, the pc software can advice everyone in case you’re just going to help land regarding an online web site that’s recognized to supply virus-like microbe infections, aiding customers to keep away from problems till that they lead to an issue! The software has a nice and user-friendly interface. Not every antivirus program gives you good outcomes. Deciding upon the ideal anti-virus software should be a lot a lot easier with our qualified reviews. If you are Test antivirus software Malwarebytes getting a new ant-virus software and might need to consider using a totally free edition, bear in mind you will discover pros and cons for the purpose of both paid out and absolutely free versions. The best issue of this tool is that it comes absolutely free of cost together with the goodwill and reputation of Microsoft. It includes a real-time protection that safeguards the device right from various secureness threats. Ant-virus tools contain needed to develop into a lot more comprehensive protection software that may take on some new types of threats. The program is normally regularly up to date to stay together with the current style. A paid antivirus software is specifically helpful in case you have a PC or equipment that is already infected. So , they have required to install nice and reputed antivirus software program to guard your windows system.
https://easyjack.com/2019/10/09/the-one-thing-to-do-for-best-windows-10-antivirus/
Avast! Antivirus is a lightweight and intuitive protection software against viruses and malware that threaten the safety of PCs. The GUI is attractive and pretty modern, and the purple color scheme is a good choice. I noticed that the front page doesn't have an Update button and it has too much-unused space. Still, the program offers a lot of customization options and overall, the interface it's very well optimized. Avast embeds a wide-range of features, having various scan modes and security tools. One of the scan modes is Smart Scan, which is a comprehensive scan that detects viruses, vulnerable software, weak passwords or other network issues. Another useful feature, Data Shredder, allows you to irreversibly erase your files or whole drives so that there is no way for anyone to restore and misuse your data. Also, it has a SafeZone Browser with many privacy features, such as Bank Mode, that creates a virtual desktop that isolates your activity from possible keyloggers and allows you to perform financial transactions without fear of your personal data being stolen. Other included features are Webcam Shield, that prevents applications and malware from accessing your PC's webcam without your consent, Anti-spam, for ensuring that the inbox in your mail management software is free from unwanted spam and junk emails, or most popular ones such as SecureLine VPN and Firewall monitor. To sum it up, Avast! Antivirus delivers good performance for a lightweight antivirus, and though the free version offers a decent amount of features, in order to enjoy full protection with no annoying ads you need to choose one of the paid package offers.
https://avast-antivirus.informer.com/
K12, an online education academy offering curriculum to US students from Kindergarden to 12th standard, has disclosed through an SEC filing that it became a victim to a ransomware attack and some portion of sensitive data was stolen by hackers from its database. A spokesperson from the Herndon based educational institute that offers online education stated that hackers accessed parts of its back office systems and stole information related to its students and employee. As K12 company is covered under a cyber insurance policy, the online education management firm bowed down to the demands of hackers and paid a million/s to decrypt the data on its servers and stopped the hackers from publishing the data onto the dark web. The organization that works for profit has disclosed that it has appointed a team of advisers on data security compliance to help the company gauge the impact of the cyber incident. And news is out that the team makes up retired attorney general and a federal prosecutor who has already zeroed on the perpetrators and will reveal the details after the full probe gets concluded. K12 that is going to be renamed as Stride on December 16th,2020 did not disclose the exact date of the ransomware attack, but assured that the grades, teachers related data, student material and information related to assignments were not affected/disrupted in the attack. Enrollment, financial reporting, shipping and accounting information also remained unaffected. Note- Coming to acquisitions, K12 purchased coding school Galvanize for $165 million in January this year. In November, the online tech academy reportedly gained Tech Elevator for $23.5 million and Online Career certification company MedCerts for $63 million.
https://www.cybersecurity-insiders.com/k12-online-school-pays-ransom-for-ransomware-attack/
A hash table or hash map is a data structure that uses a hash function to map identifying values, known as keys , to their associated values . Thus, a hash table implements an associative array. The various application servers store POST form data in hash tables, so that later they could be used during application development. If more than one key is hashed to a single hash using hash function, then it can lead to a problem called hash collision. Any application platform that use a hash function is easily affected by this vulnerability. A recent n.runs’ AG’s report explains that “If the language does not provide a randomized hash function or the application server does not recognize attacks using multi-collisions, an attacker can degenerate the hash table by sending lots of colliding keys. The algorithmic complexity of inserting n elements into the table then goes to O(n**2), making it possible to exhaust hours of CPU time using a single HTTP request” . This in turn results on DoS(Denial of Service) attacks. In general terms, DoS attacks are implemented by either forcing the targeted computer(s) to reset, or consuming its resources so that it can no longer provide its intended service or obstructing the communication media between the intended users and the victim so that they can no longer communicate adequately. How the attack works :- Here, three different keys namely wolf, tiger and elephant are hashed to the same hash 05 through hash function. This increases the complexity of processing a request which involves these key values and finally results in hash collisions. Let us now take a quick glance at how these hash table vulnerabilities affect PHP, JAVA and Tomcat.. 1) Apache Tomcat As the Apache Tomcat uses hash tables for storing various http request parameters, it is affected by the above mentioned issues. As a remedial measure, Tomcat’s Mark Thomas said: “Tomcat has implemented a work-around for this issue by providing a new option (maxParameterCount) to limit the number of parameters processed for a single request, This default limit is 10000: high enough to be unlikely to affect any application; low enough to mitigate the effects of the DoS.” The workaround is available in variants 7.0.23 and onwards, and 6.0.35 and later. However it is suggested to implement these measures and to upgrade to safer versions which are less prone to such attacks. Some servers offer the option to limit the number of parameters per request, which can also minimize impact. In short, the basic idea is to regulate the traffic of CPU utilization. thereby,at least you can keep a control on such attacks affecting your server before the respective fixes are released.
https://adminlogs.info/2012/01/04/hash-table-vulnerability-or-hash-collision/
Cyber is a domain of warfare with a unique set of challenges. Attribution is difficult, distance is irrelevant, and even small actors can have outsized impact. CYBERCOM’s effectiveness will be enhanced by the ability to work directly with the other combatant commands. “United States Cyber Command’s elevation will also help streamline command and control of time-sensitive cyberspace operations by consolidating them." Copied A ceremony in May marked the elevation of U.S. Cyber Command from a Sub-Unified Combatant Command to a Unified Combatant Command, a move that will help the military conduct cyber operations. It joined Central Command, Indo Pacific Command and Strategic Command and others as one of 10 Unified Combatant Commands in the Department of Defense. It’s a move whose time had definitely come. In fact, the only possible criticism could be: “What took you so long?” At the ceremony marking the change, the new commander of CYBERCOM, Army General Paul Nakasone, described CYBERCOM as “responsible for the planning and execution of the cyberspace missions … to secure our nation’s freedom of action in cyberspace and to help mitigate risks to our national security resulting from America’s growing dependence on cyberspace.” “Our team has both the challenge and, more importantly, the opportunity to build a combatant command from the ground up,” Nakasone said. According to Deputy Defense Secretary Patrick Shanahan, the change is “an acknowledgement that this new warfighting domain has come of age.” Given the modern reliance on networks for all facets of society, from power grids to communications networks to individual smart phones, the possibilities of a cyber-attack are broad, varying from minimal to catastrophic. Some have gone so far as to claim cyberwar will define conflict in the next century. Adversaries such as China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, and some non-state actors have increasingly advanced cyber capabilities that can target the U.S., and the challenging nature of the domain, coupled with the wide range of operations and targets involved, makes this a critical part of the new military landscape. As technology and our understanding of the implications of cyber warfare have evolved, so too has the United States’ organization to handle military cyber operations. In 1998, the same year that Apple launched the iMac, Joint Task Force-Computer Network Defense (JTF-CND), an early predecessor to CYBERCOM, was activated under the Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) to address the early security concerns around DoD networks. In 2002, it was moved to U.S. Strategic Command (STRATCOM). As the importance of cyber operations grew, in 2009 DoD stood up U.S. Cyber Command as a sub-unified command under STRATCOM. But Cyber always seemed the “odd man out” in a command focused on nuclear deterrence and strategic strike. Sub-unified commands are created to conduct a portion of the mission assigned to their parent unified command. But the rapidly growing cyber threat and its implications appeared to eclipse the responsibilities of STRATCOM. Almost from the time it was created, CYBERCOM cast a shadow greater than a typical sub-unified command, such as Alaska Command (under Northern Command) or U.S. Forces Korea (under Indo Pacific Command). To their credit, successive STRATCOM and CYBERCOM commanders made the relationship work, but despite their efforts, the subordinate nature of a sub-unified command served to diminish in stature and importance the critical mission of the command. Cyber-attacks in Georgia in 2009, South Korea in 2009, and the attack on Sony Pictures in 2014 all highlighted the increasing vulnerabilities and potential of cyber warfare. As a Unified Combatant Command, CYBERCOM’s effectiveness will be enhanced by the ability to work directly with the other combatant commands, and by its commander’s authority to report directly to the secretary of defense. It also means better synchronization of training and operations, as the commander of CYBERCOM was given responsibility to be the joint force trainer for cyber. All of this will enhance the amount of impact Cyber Command will wield inside and outside of the Pentagon, which is needed in this critically important area. Special Operations Command’s elevation to Unified Command in 1987, and the benefits that this change conveyed, amply illustrates this point. Better training, acquisition speed and coordination of efforts led to SOCOM’s unequaled ability to wage the global war on terror in a fast-paced environment of near constant operations. The Cyber force can now enjoy these advantages as well. Marking the elevation of CYBERCOM to a unified command, President Trump noted in a White House announcement that “United States Cyber Command’s elevation will also help streamline command and control of time-sensitive cyberspace operations by consolidating them under a single commander with authorities commensurate with the importance of such operations. Elevation will also ensure that critical cyberspace operations are adequately funded.” Thus the elevation of CYBERCOM is unquestionably positive and the reorganization overdue given the importance of cyber in modern warfare and the need to address threats in cyber space, both here and in combat theaters abroad. However, this is not a quick fix to the challenges and threats we face in the cyber domain. Much work remains to be done as the nation continues to grapple with this new challenge institutionally. CYBERCOM’s elevation is a sure win for the United States, but as General Nakasone recognized, the nation is only now beginning to discern the broad contours of the threats and opportunities present in military cyber operations. Greater attention and investment from policymakers are needed to better develop the U.S. strategy and capabilities for effective cyber operations for the future.
https://www.heritage.org/cybersecurity/commentary/elevating-cyber-command-overdue-step-towards-enhancing-military-cyber
Whether you are looking to protect your web activities or your loved ones from destructive software, ant-virus software is the important thing. However , there are a lot of different options to choose from. A number of the main considerations when choosing an item are the price, features, and customer service. If you’re searching for a good anti virus, you’ll need to seek for a product that works well and is also easy to use. It will also include a no cost trial to enable you to test out its capabilities. You are able to opt for an offline or on the web version associated with an antivirus. An offline edition will defend your system via spyware and also other external threats, yet won’t have the added feature of online malware scanning. Many people are wary of downloading infections to their Computers, so a great offline type is often better. When shopping for a great antivirus, you’ll also ought to look for features such as internet browser extensions. These types of will help you protect your internet browser from spyware, and some may also prevent scam goes for. Most ant-virus software packages include a totally free trial. This permits you to check how quickly your personal computer runs, and how easy you should navigate through the different features. The software might also have an option to change your privateness settings, which is important for anybody who is using a registration. Ideally, the antivirus method you’re looking at should be available, but you ought not to have to go by using a long, slow installation method. Many suppliers offer these programs as free downloads, therefore you won’t https://positivelyblack.net/mobile/applications/how-to-disable-avast-cybercapture/ have to distinguish yourself like a user on the product.
https://www.the-globe.dk/choosing-an-antivirus-online/
CUPERTINO, Calif., July 25, 2012 /PRNewswire/ -- Cybercriminals have increased their focus in targeting individuals and organizations of all sizes to steal personal and financial information according to the security roundup report for the second quarter of 2012 released today by the global cloud security leader Trend Micro Incorporated (TYO: 4704; TSE: 4704). Among the examples of these increasingly focused attacks were the 142 million threats which were blocked from infecting small businesses as of the second quarter of 2012, an increase of 27% quarter on quarter. Trend Micro's report also outlines increasingly sophisticated attacks against individuals in the form of ATS attacks. Large organizations weren't exempt either: the IXSHE campaign showed cybercriminals stepping up their tactics to gain access to large multinational corporations without notice. In addition to these more targeted attacks, Trend Micro's report shows cybercriminals continuing to cast their net widely in large-scale attacks using newer, more lethal methods. Police Trojan Attacks and the Black Hole Exploit Kit continue to target desktop systems while newer platforms such as Android are seeing an unprecedented explosion in malicious apps. Social media wasn't exempt as cybercriminals jumped on the Pinterest bandwagon bringing tried-and-true scams to the latest social networking craze. Across the board though, the goal is the same: to get personal data and financial information. "The reason why criminals are focusing their attacks on stealing personal data is simple. It's the sheer volume of people working from multiple devices that leaves them vulnerable to attacks," said Rik Ferguson, director of security research and communication, Trend Micro. "While Trend Micro has been integral in working with authorities to break up a number of cybercriminal rings over the last year, these cybercriminals have acquired new techniques and tools from collaborating with one another to accelerate their 'industry.' The fact is: business is booming for cybercrime and everyone needs to take notice." To save this item to your list of favorite Dark Reading content so you can find it later in your Profile page, click the "Save It" button next to the item. If you found this interesting or useful, please use the links to the services below to share it with other readers. You will need a free account with each service to share an item via that service.
https://www.darkreading.com/attacks-breaches/trend-micro-releases-security-roundup-report-for-q2-2012/d/d-id/1138107
js = d.createElement (s); js.id = id; js.src = "http://connect.facebook.net/ar_AR/sdk.js";
https://manchikoni.com/you-can-also-use-the-encryption-key-to-get-started/
This isn't a ploy to get users to spend more money, however -- it is Steam's answer to the growing number of trolls on the platform. As stated on the Steam Support page: We've chosen to limit access to these features as a means of protecting our customers from those who abuse Steam for purposes such as spamming and phishing. The networks data shows that when comparing regular and malicious users, the accounts being used for foul behavior often have no investment in the platform or its games. After all, why have a Steam account if not to play games? Many users are commending Steam for setting up the money gate, as they hope it will limit unwarranted negative reviews, among other things. However, as always, a loud few are calling for its immediate removal. Granted, some users have legitimate reasons for their disapproval, such as the fact that they only use the platform to play free games. Whilst Steam supports so many free to play games, this will always be an issue. I support the $5 minimum but a decent standards of behaviour policy and administration of that policy would be better albeit more expensive from Steam's perspective to police.
https://www.gameskinny.com/5lg3s/steam-cracking-down-on-spam-and-phishing-with-5-minimum-purchase
Did you know you could rent textbooks on Google Play, instead of buying them? You get to keep them for 180 days, and you don’t even need an Android tablet to read them and take notes—Google Play Books is available for iPhone and iPads as well as Android devices. Renting textbooks instead of buying them? Genius. With their convenient size and long battery life, tablets and phones are perfect for reading your books—and think of how much lighter your backpack will be. If you desperately need to read a textbook on your laptop, you can even download a PDF, although restrictions make this less than ideal. Not having to spend hundreds of dollars on books you might read once—or worse, expensive books that the professor only assigns one chapter of—is the very definition of “ideal.” A definition you can even get inside the Google Play Books app. Evernote The ultimate note-taking app, Evernote is perfect for students. You can digitize and search notes you took on paper. It’s fully cross-platform, with an app for every device and an extension for every browser. And it’s incredibly powerful. Evernote lets you save content from anywhere and mark it up with notes and tags. The Evernote apps for the iPhone, Windows Phone, and Android have some unique skills, too. You can use the device’s camera to create a new note by snapping a picture, say, of a classmate’s notes, or the office hours posted on your professor’s door. Any text visible in those images becomes searchable, and Evernote can also keep track of where each picture was taken, too. Tons and tons of other apps let you save things to your Evernote account—a few of our favorites include Drafts for iOS, the cross-platform image-annotation tool Skitch, and the wildly flexible IFTTT. Dragon Microphone Turn your smartphone into a wireless mic for use with Dragon NaturallySpeaking for Windows or Dragon Dictate for Mac. Dragon NaturallySpeaking for PC and Dragon Dictate for Mac are extremely powerful speech-to-text tools that will let you dictate your notes and research papers instead of typing them word by word. They learn your voice to improve accuracy over time, and handy transcription features can even attempt to turn an audio file of a recorded lecture into text. The free companion app, Dragon Remote Microphone for iOS and Android turns your phone into a wireless microphone, perfect for pacing circles around your tiny dorm room muttering about 19th century French literature. If you can stammer out a first draft at least, you’ll avoid the dread of staring at a blank page trying not to think of the term “writer’s block.” AudioNote So where do you get those audio files of your lectures for Dragon to transcribe? Try AudioNote, $5 for Android or iOS. (Developer Luminant Software offers versions for Mac and Windows too.) AudioNote synchronizes your handwritten and typed notes to the audio recording. The built-in voice recorder can capture your lecture or small-group discussion, while you jot down notes that are automatically synced up to the recording. Later you can just tap a note to jump to that part of the recording. That means you no longer have to worry about scribbling down everything important that’s said, and you can be more present in the discussion instead of focusing on taking detailed notes. You can email the notes and audio files together or separately. Quickoffice Pro HD Quickoffice Pro HD isn’t cheap—it’s $20 for Android tablets and the iPad, and the smaller-screen, non-HD version is $15 for Android phones and the iPhone. Ever wanted to create a new Excel spreadsheet on your phone? Come on, of course you have. But if you really need to create and edit Microsoft Office files (that’s Word docs, Excel spreadsheets, and PowerPoint presentations) on the go, it’s just the thing you need. Quickoffice integrates with Google Drive, Dropbox, Evernote, Box, SugarSync, and a few more cloud services, so wherever you park your files, you’ll be able to access, edit, and share them with this app. And while the interfaces take a little while to get used to, they’re well designed and generally free of clutter. Now that Google purchased Quickoffice, it’s coming to Chrome too. ZotPad and Zandy Our roundup of must-have desktop software for students includes Zotero, a cross-platform tool for managing a library of scholarly articles and creating citations from them to insert into your own research papers. Guess what? There’s a mobile app for that too. A well-stocked Zotero library in ZotPad can take the place of reams of paper you’d otherwise have to haul with you. ZotPad, $10 for iOS, lets you access anything in your Zotero library from your iPhone or iPad, syncing via the Zotero server, your own WebDAV server, or even Dropbox. It’s a great way to keep up with your reading while you’re commuting to and from campus. Android users should try out Zandy, a $2 app that lets you view and edit your Zotero items and their file attachments, and add new items to your Zotero library. Dropbox Do we really have to tell you to get Dropbox? Hopefully not, but if you’ve managed to get this far without Dropbox…you should still get Dropbox. You’ll get 2GB of cloud storage for free, and it’s probably the most versatile service out there for syncing data between your desktop, mobile, and dozens of compatible apps. Keep all of your most important files effortlessly synced across every device, thanks to Dropbox. Dropbox makes sharing files easy too—the other people in your study group don’t even need to be Dropbox users to send you files over the service, but if they’re smart enough to get into college, they probably have Dropbox too. Sign up for an account and grab mobile apps for your Android, iPhone, iPad, BlackBerry, Windows Phone, and Kindle Fire. Wunderlist Juggling multiple deadlines and learning how to manage your time is one of the biggest practical skills you can learn in college—no matter what your major, think of yourself as a project manager in training, because that’s essentially what you are. So you’ll need a killer to-do list, and Wunderlist is one of our favorites. It looks great, works across all platforms, and strikes a balance between its rich feature set and uncluttered, easily understood interface. Wunderlist can keep your school tasks and all your everyday life tasks side by side, so you’ll always know what needs to be done. You can get free apps for iOS and Android, plus a handy Chrome extension and of course the Web app, Pokki version, and native clients for Mac and Windows too. You can spring for a Pro account ($5 a month or $50 a year) to add files, assign tasks to other team members, but for most students the free account will suffice. We especially love its ability to create new tasks from email messages.
https://www.pcworld.com/article/447416/8-essential-mobile-apps-for-college-students.html
The computer science program provides students with a curriculum in the key domains of computer science at undergraduate and graduate levels. These programs provide students with computer science knowledge and skills while preparing them for careers in computer technology and for advanced study in graduate courses. Whether joining the workforce or continuing on to graduate studies, the TROY computer science program can help you realize your full potential. You have options with TROY to learn in a classroom, online or in a blended program. Students in this program have the opportunity to work on individual and team projects that include game design, cell phone apps, web applications, visualizations and more. Students in the computer science undergraduate and graduate programs benefit from small classes and an active Computer Science Club, a student organization that hosts weekly seminars, study sessions and many other activities. TROY’s undergraduate curriculum is centered in the latest technological advances taught by a caring and highly qualified faculty. Students work on individual and team projects, focusing on game design, cell phone apps, web applications, visualization, Teensy Board Programming and database accessing applications to name a few.
https://www.troy.edu/academics/academic-programs/graduate/computer-science-computer-network-security.html?actualpro=Computer%20Science%20-%20Computer%20Network%20and%20Security%20%28Thesis%29
Travis Central Appraisal District is responsible for providing the value of real and business personal properties in the county. The attack is said to have impacted website property search, email, phone, and Computer Assisted Mass Appraisal systems. The attack, that happened at 9:30 pm on September 11 was confirmed by the agency on September 19. Daily operations such as customer services and appraisal protests were not affected by this attack. A ransomware virus is believed to be associated with this cyber attack. Many files were encrypted and rendered inaccessible to the server, causing certain services of the agency to stop working. What did the agency do? As soon as the attack was detected, the agency isolated the affected systems and notified the cybersecurity officials as well as state agencies. The District refused to pay the ransom and is working with experts to restore operations. Backup data was stored in offshore locations by the District. This is being used to restore system functionality. Primary systems are reported to be restored. The District assured that officials are working on restoring secondary systems soon. The District is engaging with cybersecurity experts to analyze the attack and to implement preventive strategies so similar attacks don’t recur in the future. “We continue to restore secondary computer systems and work with cyber security experts and state agencies to identify the parties responsible for the cyber-attack,” said Marya Crigler, Chief Appraiser of Travis Central Appraisal District in the media statement.
https://cyware.com/news/travis-central-appraisal-district-falls-victim-to-ransomware-attack-0dc4c3f8/
Arlington, VA – (May 21, 2012) -- Lookingglass Cyber Solutions, a cyber security company whose revolutionary appliance-based platform delivers over-the-horizon cyber threat suppression, announced today its Cyber-Heads-Up-Display, CyberHUD, a new alert and warning capability that empowers users to rapidly define and continuously monitor for threats within customer, provider and partner networks. Specifically, CyberHUD monitors global networks for resiliency, threats, malware, routing hi-jacks and malicious actor’s tools, tactics and procedures. Lookingglass, a pioneer in the industry of cyber threat suppression and ecosystem data visualization, aggregates and presents data from outside a client's network and control, rather than the traditional approach of only considering data within the client's control spectrum. The Lookingglass platform empowers customers to adopt a new cyber security risk approach that tightly aligns business needs with operational realities. CyberHUD is a key component of Lookingglass flagship product - ScoutVisionTM. The CyberHud enables customers to identify, understand and act against cyber threats before they impact internal operations. ScoutVision allows its users to aggregate and analyze a myriad of cyber intelligence sources to identify global threats as soon as they emerge. It enriches that intelligence with data from its users’ internal enterprise network, so customers can rapidly determine the relevance of those threats and more effectively focus resources. ScoutVision continuously ingests routing data describing ownership of over 53,000 autonomous systems, 500,000 CIDR blocks, billions of IP addresses, and aggregates over 40 million trace routes daily to provide context to more than 50 proprietary threat feeds. With the Lookingglass platform, organizations are no longer tied to the antiquated ‘stop any and all security events’ mindset. Customers can now contextualize threat actors, motives, attack surface, TTP and attacking sources to preserve business continuity and resiliency. “In an environment where computing resources are becoming increasingly dispersed and perimeter defenses are obviated by network topologies, ScoutVision enables customers to monitor the security of all the networks through which their information travels and resides,” stated Derek Gabbard, Lookingglass CEO. “Across our datasets, thus far in 2012 alone, Lookingglass has identified over 80 million unique malicious IPs. Organizations need ScoutVision to continuously monitor their cyber ecosystem so they can easily determine whether any of these networks are harboring known threats.” Detecting threats introduced by third parties is essential to understanding a company’s complete exposure and risk profile. Supply chain, critical infrastructure, cloud provider networks and routing paths all contribute to a customer’s cyber ecosystem and add to its attack surface. While traditional enterprise security solutions are primarily focused on the activity within an organization’s network, most enterprises recognize the need to understand the threats outside their network. ScoutVision integrates, correlates and prioritizes various threat feeds and then provides context, so that users can determine which threats are most critical. Deployed as an appliance, ScoutVision leverages an open architecture, which provides source and sensor agnostic threat visibility – meaning customers are not tied to black box solutions that deliver limited visibility. CyberHUD is also available on CloudScoutTM, the Lookingglass hosted version of ScoutVision, which offers customers a cloud-based solution. The Lookingglass customer base spans a variety of sectors including CNCI/homeland security, financial services, defense industrial base and intelligence sectors with traction in the Fortune 100, government defense contractors and U.S. federal agencies, specifically those charged with critical infrastructure protection. To save this item to your list of favorite Dark Reading content so you can find it later in your Profile page, click the "Save It" button next to the item. If you found this interesting or useful, please use the links to the services below to share it with other readers. You will need a free account with each service to share an item via that service.
https://www.darkreading.com/lookingglass-announces-new-cyber-threat-alert-and-warning-capability-cyberhud/d/d-id/1137750
But what are reasonable cybersecurity measures? Fortunately, the FTC provides some guidance on what these look like. They must include many safeguards. The good news is that most effective safeguards are easy to put into place. By following these, your business should be able to adhere to cybersecurity best practices: Require all employees with access to personal information to use strong passwords. Restrict employees’ access to personal information to a “need-to-know” basis. Train employees on basic cybersecurity best practices and coach them on how to take precautions, such as learning how to identify scams and not falling for phishing emails. Use multi-factor authentication for remote access to personal information. Update software and operating systems with the latest security patches. This is not a complete list of possible cybersecurity precautions, but these measures can prevent many data breaches. They can also help to create a culture of cybersecurity within your organization. Another aspect of reasonable cybersecurity pertains to vendors. An outside company that has access to your business’s records, including personal information, should commit to reasonable cybersecurity practices. Any vendor contracts should require the vendors to safeguard data, notify you of a data breach and indemnify you for breach costs. You should review and renegotiate these contracts as necessary, to follow the law. The bad news about reasonable cybersecurity? Despite your best efforts at prevention, a data breach is virtually inevitable. “It’s not a matter of if, but when,” is the common refrain. This makes your preparation and response all the more important. The first is that you must notify individuals who had their personal information accessed. This can get a bit tricky. With the assistance of legal counsel and a forensic investigator, you must determine whether “personal information,” as legally defined, was accessed. If it was, you must determine how many individuals were affected and where they live. Those questions will determine which laws apply and whether other parties need to be notified of the breach. Depending on the size and scope of the breach, your business may need to notify your state’s attorney general and consumer reporting agencies. If the breach involved credit card data, you must notify the appropriate credit card processors. If your company was a vendor for another company, you must notify your client. All notifications must be made within specified time periods after the breach and, depending on which state’s law applies, they must contain certain information about the breach. Failing to follow notification laws can result in substantial financial penalties (e.g. up to $500,000 in Florida), though these specific requirements and penalties vary from state to state. If your business has cybersecurity insurance, the insurer should be notified as within the requirements of the policy. Finally, you must repair the vulnerability that allowed the data breach to prevent the same breach from happening again. Cybersecurity law expects businesses to learn from their mistakes. While a brighter cybersecurity future may be on the horizon, businesses that are hacked may still have to spend time and money defending such lawsuits, regardless of their merit. State and federal regulators, such as the FTC, have brought enforcement actions against businesses for having poor cybersecurity practices or for not taking reasonable cybersecurity measures. The regulators deem poor cybersecurity an unfair business practice, and they have ordered businesses to take certain corrective measures and adhere to extensive reporting requirements for up to 20 years. Businesses seeking to avoid these financial and practical burdens must be able to show that they practiced reasonable cybersecurity measures all along, but were breached nonetheless. In that scenario, the business would be well positioned to defeat lawsuits and satisfy any regulatory inquiries that arise from the data breach. Cybersecurity law is complex. This article provides a broad overview, but it’s a good starting point on how to create a legally compliant culture of cybersecurity within your business. With these pieces in place, your business can use cybersecurity best practices to begin minimizing the chance of a data breach. [Editor’s Note: To learn more about this and related topics, you may want to attend the following webinars: Data Privacy Compliance 2020, Introduction to US Privacy and Data Security: Regulations and Requirements 2020, Cyber Security & Data Privacy 2019. This is an updated version of an article originally published on September 14, 2018.]
https://www.financialpoise.com/cybersecurity-best-practices/
As companies from small to large begin to grow into their need for reliable and convenient storage solutions, the need for secure access to the data they are storing grows as well. For example, in November of 2014, Sony Pictures Entertainment was hit with a Denial of Service attack, overloading their servers. Their employees were prevented from doing their jobs and, more importantly, several of their highest level projects and internal company data had been stolen and leaked to the internet. This is just one example of why network and storage security is of critical importance to companies around the world. Fortunately, there are several options available to companies for their storage needs. All of them have their areas of strength and areas that need improvement; however, in terms of security, there are a couple of options that stand out and should be considered when looking for storage solutions: • The Cloud This solution is by far the easiest to find since it is all done online. For those on a limited IT budget, Cloud Storage is ideal as there are no physical drives to maintain or networking problems. It also provides a decent way to backup information off-site, meaning that data would be safe from fire, natural disaster, or physical theft. However, there are some substantial drawbacks for those companies that do not have stable, high-bandwidth internet connections. Storing large files requires equally large amounts of bandwidth. Additionally, privacy is an ever-present issue as the storage provider is responsible for security. This means that unauthorized persons or even entire governments can access that data depending on the situation. A secondary consideration is the cost of cloud storage. These may seem small upfront; however, those costs do not scale with companies over time. If a company scales rapidly, the incremental costs may build up when they aren’t expected. • JBOD Just a Bunch of Disks, or JBOD for short. AIC's JBODs are modular. In other words, it is easily swappable in case of failure and troubleshooting while the system is running and easily expandable when a company scales. This allows JBOD systems to be more flexible in their implementation depending on a company's needs, allowing for either singular access to the drive, or network-wide access as long as they are connected to the network. Compared to Cloud Storage, this makes for similar accessibility without the need for large amounts of bandwidth and provides a more secure way to access information. AIC’s JBOD enclosures allow for the amount of redundancy you choose. You can hook many enclosures to more than one server, allowing you to back up you most important data in multiple ways. Companies will need these types of solutions now more than ever, and AIC is committed to offering digital storage solutions with efficiency and security in mind for your business needs.
http://mktg.aicipc.com/acton/media/13025/network-security-and-data-storage-using-jbod
FTC advertises Zoom's security practices as 'providing end-to-end encryption to protect user communications,' even though it doesn't actually implement end-to-end encryption. He pointed out that he misunderstood the user. According to FTV, Zoom will end with a compliance guide released in June 2016 and July 2017, a blog post in April 2017, a white paper released in January 2019, and answers to customer inquiries. He claimed to offer two-end encryption. 'In fact, Zoom's servers, including those located in China, stored encryption keys that allowed users to access the contents of Zoom conferences, except for Zoom conferences hosted on their own servers. We did not provide end-to-end encryption, 'says FTC. Zoom also provided a service to store meeting records in the cloud, but some records were stored unencrypted on Zoom's servers for up to 60 days. Another problem is that Zoom secretly installed software called 'ZoomOpener Web server' for users of Zoom on Mac computers. The ZoomOpener Web server helped Zoom bypass Apple's security protocol and prevented Safari from displaying a warning box to users. The FTC has pointed out that the ZoomOpener Web server increases the risk of third party invasion of user privacy and in some cases reinstalls the uninstalled Zoom. In July 2019, Zoom implemented an update to remove ZoomOpener Web server from Mac applications. FTC has been investigating these Zoom security issues. And on November 9, a settlement proposal was made on the conditions of 'establishing and implementing a comprehensive security program,'prohibiting misrepresentation of privacy and security,' and 'establishing detailed and concrete remedies to protect users.' It was announced that Zoom agreed. 'During the pandemic, virtually everyone, including families, schools, social groups and businesses, communicates using video conferencing, and these platforms,' said Andrew Smith, FTC's Director of Consumer Protection. Security in is more important than ever. While Zoom security practices weren't in line with what we promised our users, FTC actions help ensure that we protect data about our Zoom conferencing and our users. ' Said. The settlement was supported by Republican members, who make up the majority of the FTC, but Democrats are opposed to the settlement. ' The reconciliation does not provide any help to affected users, even for small businesses that rely on Zoom's data protection claims,' said Rohit Chopra, a Democratic member of the FTC. Zoom doesn't even have to pay 10 cents coins, 'he said, arguing that there is a problem with this settlement, which Zoom does not cover. Meanwhile, Zoom is facing lawsuits from investors and consumers, leaving the possibility of indemnifying users apart from the FTC's settlement, Ars Technica of foreign media said. ..
https://gigazine.net/gsc_news/en/20201111-zoom-lied-users-encryption
We recently delivered our flagship cybersecurity training course, the GCHQ-Certified Cyber Incident Planning and Response (CIPR) workshop to UAE's Dubai Islamic Bank. The interactive, UK Government-certified incident management training was delivered to a mixed group of Senior Management and members of the IT Audit function with the objective of enabling management to understand the audit requirements for incident management, improve the organisation's incident response capability and increase its overall cyber resilience maturity.
https://www.cm-alliance.com/news/topic/incident-response
An SSL certificate is something installed on your website to secure the connection between our server and the computer used to browse your website. You’ll know if a website has an SSL certificate because it will have a padlock on the address bar. Having an SSL installed on your website not only secures the connection between us and the person browsing your site, but it also instils confidence in your business to your customers as they will also know your site is secure. Do I need an SSL? Now that Chrome marks all websites who do not have a SSL as ‘unsafe’ it is recommended that you arrange for an SSL to be used on your website. We offer a number of industry recognised SSL certificates that are used to secure your website and its sub domains. The process is simple most business class SSL’s and can be setup the very same day.
https://firstcms.co.uk/internet-security/ssl-certificates
Notice: Undefined offset: 1 in /home/wwwuniss/public_html/fai/peradaban/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 917 Strict Standards: Non-static method Sociable_Globals::sociable_get_post_types() should not be called statically in /home/wwwuniss/public_html/fai/peradaban/wp-content/plugins/sociable/sociable.php on line 251 Strict Standards: Non-static method Sociable_Globals::sociable_get_taxonomies() should not be called statically in /home/wwwuniss/public_html/fai/peradaban/wp-content/plugins/sociable/sociable.php on line 259
http://peradaban.unissula.ac.id/category/antivirus/
by channelnewsasia.com posted 2months ago 32 views The new entity, called Ensign InfoSecurity, will be headed by Mr Lee Fook Sun, who was previously executive chairman of Quann World.
https://www.thetrustedinsight.com/investment-news/temasek-and-starhub-partner-to-form-one-of-asias-largest-cybersecurity-firms-20180905528/
April 13, 2013, 10:30 am There is no doubt that the cases of cybercrimes are increasing in number as years go by. In The 2012 Data Breach Investigation Report (DBIR) published by Verizon, there were 855 incidents of corporate data theft and around 174 million records were affected by the hacking events. The figures do not even include personal hacking incidents. In the recent data of Cyber Crime Watch, approximately 73% Americans fell victim to cybercrime. Experts have successfully accounted the figures. Then, analysts have explained how to prevent hackers from victimizing people. However, what seems to be lacking in the reports generated by people studying the phenomenon is the reason behind cybercrimes. They fail to discuss entirely why people do it and the human element of the crime. In an attempt to provide answer to the underlying question regarding the reason behind cybercrimes, Dr. Michael Cukier and Dr. David Maimon partnered together to investigate the driving factors of hackers and the profile of cybercrime victims. The research involved looking at the behavior of hackers and victims. The experts studied the online routines of victims that rendered them very vulnerable to hacking. Next, the answers to the basic questions surrounding criminal behavior were explored. The methods they employed in the search for answers include putting together the principles of criminology, sociology and engineering methods. According to Cukier, the problem is human in nature. In his statement, he claimed that we shouldn’t be needing passwords if it weren’t for the prying eyes of other people. Thus, he arrived at a realization that there is a massive human element to the phenomenon. The main driving factor behind hacking is the money behind the information that is fished out from personal or corporate data. It should be noted that every survey conducted by huge corporations is the same with this realization. Going back to the data of Verizon, phishing financial information from credit cards, transaction usernames and passwords, bank accounts and prying over trade secrets remain all time high. This is because all of these elements can all translate to money if used properly by the hacker. After the identification of the primary motivation of cybercriminals, Cukier and Maimon found out that the time of the cyber attack is usually during the day because this is usually the time (around 9AM to 5PM) when a huge number of users are hooked up on the Internet. Hackers, no matter where they are in the globe, synchronize their attacks based on the studied online activities of their target said the researchers. Lastly, the number of foreign network users, such as foreign students, is correlated with the attacks. They observed the relation of hacking incidents in their school involving these users. They discovered that the hacking originates from the countries of the foreign users. Maimon concluded the research by saying that network users mainly account to the observed network attacks. Therefore, future online security solutions should be developed based on the human factor of cybercrime. Disclaimer: we are not affiliated with the device manufacturers or phone carriers we mention in any way, all suggestions are based on our own experience and research, you may use our advice at your own discretion. Support Us If you have enjoyed our free help please support us by liking us on Facebook and signup for our weekly newsletter.
http://thedroidguy.com/2013/04/researchers-uncover-the-reason-behind-cybercrimes-58399
NewsSchool of Engineering News Recent NewsMilken Institute ranks UNM among top universities for technology transferMay 25, 2017School of Engineering announces Expo elevator pitch winnersMay 25, 2017Veroff fund still seeking donationsMay 22, 2017UNM students ‘teaching rockets to fly’ May 16, 2017 News Archives2017January 2017February 2017March 2017April 2017May 20172016January 2016February 2016March 2016April 2016May 2016June 2016July 2016August 2016September 2016October 2016November 2016December 20162015January 2015February 2015March 2015April 2015May 2015June 2015July 2015August 2015September 2015October 2015November 2015December 20152014February 2014March 2014April 2014May 2014June 2014July 2014August 2014September 2014October 2014November 2014December 20142013January 2013February 2013March 2013April 2013May 2013June 2013July 20132012January 2012February 2012March 2012April 2012May 2012June 2012July 2012August 2012September 2012October 2012November 20122011January 2011February 2011March 2011April 2011May 2011June 2011July 2011August 2011September 2011October 2011November 2011December 20112010January 2010February 2010March 2010April 2010May 2010June 2010July 2010August 2010September 2010October 2010November 2010December 20102009January 2009February 2009March 2009April 2009May 2009June 2009July 2009August 2009September 2009October 2009November 2009December 20092008January 2008February 2008March 2008April 2008May 2008June 20082007January 2007February 2007April 2007August 2007RSS Feed UNM> Home>News>2017>February>UNM professor uses game theory to explore best response to cyber attacks UNM professor uses game theory to explore best response to cyber attacks February 28, 2017A University of New Mexico computer science professor is co-author of an article in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences that explores how cyber attack victims should best respond. Stephanie Forrest, a distinguished professor in the Department of Computer Science at UNM and an external faculty member at the Santa Fe Institute, is an author of the article which presents a game-theoretic model called the Blame Game, which shows when a victim should tolerate an attack and when it should respond publicly. The best strategic choice depends on the vulnerability of the attacker, the victim’s knowledge level, the potential payoff for various outcomes and the beliefs each player has about its attacker. The model applies to a wide range of conflicts and provides guidance to policymakers about which parameters must be estimated to make a sound decision about attribution and blame. Analysis of the model suggests that in many cases it may be rational for nations to tolerate cyberattacks, even in the face of strong public criticism. It also shows how imbalances between adversaries’ abilities to trace attacks back to their origin can be destabilizing. The article was published in the Feb. 27 online edition of PNAS and comes as the United States faces increasing threats in cyberspace, including the recent widely publicized attacks against the Democratic National Committee and the Chinese theft of databases containing the personal information of 21.5 million federal employees. “Conflict is increasingly common and severe on the Internet today, as governments and corporations have recognized its potential as an instrument of power and control,” Forrest said. “Unlike nuclear technology, it can be extremely challenging to identify the party responsible for a cyber attack, and this complicates the strategic decision of when to assign blame. Our model elucidates these issues and identifies key parameters that must be considered in formulating a response.” At UNM, Forrest directs the Adaptive Computation Laboratory, where she leads interdisciplinary research and education programs, including work on computer security, software engineering, and biological modeling. She is also a member of the Center for Evolutionary and Theoretical Immunology (CETI) and a co-principal investigator of the ADVANCE at UNM project, which is dedicated to recruiting, retaining and advancing women and minority STEM faculty.
http://engineering.unm.edu/news/2017/02/unm-professor-uses-game-theory-to-explore-best-response-to-cyber-attacks.html
Risk is a multifaceted, ever-changing element of any business. So the strategies employed to manage risk should be even more dynamic. At Haylor, Freyer & Coon we have the people and partnerships to do almost anything in the realm of risk management. Our offerings are not simply about services, but comprehensive health, safety and industrial hygiene solutions that are both proactive and sustainable. Our team brings to the table real knowledge and practical experience in the industries we serve, and we work closely with you, adapting to your company’s unique needs and sophistication level. If you have an existing Environmental Health & Safety team, for example, we can work collaboratively and act as an extension of that team to best benefit your company. In the simplest of terms, you won’t get a boilerplate product from Haylor. We deliver a tailored solution that is fully integrated into the operations of your facility – both today and for years to come.
http://www.haylor.com/risk-management-solutions/health-safety-industrial-hygiene-solutions/
Darren Tedesco, Commonwealth Financial Network’s managing principal, innovation and strategy, has been named to the 2013 Premier 100 IT Leaders list. The Premier 100, now in its 14th year, spotlights leaders from both the technology and business sides of companies for their exceptional technology leadership and innovative approaches to business challenges. Earlier this year, Tedesco was also named to InvestmentNews’s “Power 20” list of people who will have the greatest influence on financial advisors and the industry in 2012. Tedesco will be honored, along with fellow Premier 100 recipients, in a special awards ceremony at Computerworld’s annual Premier 100 IT Leaders Conference, March 3–5, 2013, at the JW Marriott Starr Pass Resort & Spa in Tucson, Arizona. SEC Names Todd Scharf Chief Information Security Officer The SEC announced recently that it has named Todd Scharf Sr. as chief information security officer and associate director in the agency’s Office of Information Technology. He will continue to lead the SEC’s Office of Information Security, which is responsible for identifying and mitigating potential information-technology security risks and information breaches. He has been actively involved in directing SEC efforts to identify and resolve security risks and exposures and will continue those efforts in his new role.
http://www.thinkadvisor.com/2012/12/12/new-hire-roundup-commonwealths-tedesco-honored?t=risk-management&page=2
We are living in an age defined by SPEED. We look always for shortcuts, faster ways, and faster solutions in order to save our time. Supposing most of the people use browser extensions because they are too lazy to download and install a software with the same functions as the extension, or they want to save some time or because they just discovered a faster way to explore lots of features in a short time, I will continue the talk about the danger behind browser extensions. 2. What are these extensions? Firstly chrome extensions are NOT browser plugins, they are browser add-ons, HTML5 applications that enrich the browser’s user experience. By installing these extensions, you give your browser additional functionality (mail notification, ad blocking, online bookmarking, developer tools, page recommendation, notebooks, and so on). 3. Why are they so interesting as a subject of research? Google chrome extensions are basically HTML applications, so they suffer for the same vulnerabilities as usual websites but the difference between extensions and websites is the fact that an extension requires higher level access privileges. For example, in theory, extensions can read and write all the cookies so they are a good to start a hijacking attack. They can even change your proxy settings, block requests that your browser is trying to send over HTTP or HTTP, can take screenshots of websites and so on. Knowing this I figured why the extensions are so popular, we should take a closer look and try to avoid the bad things extensions can bring. 4. How are they built? Basically they are a bunch of files (HTML + JS + CSS ), zipped and signed with a developer key, (just like a usual mobile application) packaged into a CRX file.. 5. How we can install these things? We can install the extensions more or less from the Chrome Web Store, also we can install them from some 3rd party websites or just manually by dragging the extension CRX file intothe chrome extensions page and hit the install option. is a regular expression which defines on which website the extension or the content script going run. So as long the URL matches the settings in the extension, the browser will load up the content script. -Content Scripts – on presented example we have jquery-1.8.1 and content.js as content scripts -View Pages – this component is related to the user interface. Extensions can have a little button on the right top bar of browser interface, also can have a options page, usually loaded as a pop-up, where we are able to adjust extension functionalities. To make things more complicated, extensions have some background pages that runs constantly in a hidden mode and lives inside the browser session. So as long as you can execute code in that domain, the background page is persistent. – NPAPI Plugins (optional) – some extensions also bundle NPAPI plugins which are simple binary code compiled for the architecture of the browser. The Code running in an NPAPI plugin has the full permissions of the current user and is not sandboxed or shielded from malicious input so we must double check the source of the extensions that use NPAPI before installing and using them. 7. Security – How secure are the extensions we use? First let’s take a look at how all these components talk to each other. The first part, Content Script, runs in a context or in origin of the webpage that is been displayed, so of course it can access the actual DOM elements. It can modify the DOM to enrich the website (for example, to capture all the images or to insert some additional toolbars and so on). It uses the standard JavaScript DOM access like HTML property, document cookies or document title. So this is a way of exchanging information between the website and a part of the extension greater than the content script. BUT at the same time, the content script cannot stock the information directly to the JavaScript already running. Also it cannot call functions, it cannot be called from the original website so there is a security boundary here. Content Script also has access to the part of the extension that is able to submit AJAX requests which is much powerful because it’s a cross domain, so it can get the response back. View Pages, can communicate with the Content Script and vice versa only by sending messages and receiving responses (similar with HTML5 post messages API). No direct functions calls, no DOM access just exchanging messages. BUT View Pages in a background page can instantiate new content scripts which is a form of an evil because, you can directly pass the code as a string parameter here and it will get evaluated as a content script in the context of the webpage that has been viewed. View and Background Pages are the only components of a Google Chrome extension which has access to this powerful extension API and represent the hard stuff of an extension because using this API, the extension can change proxy settings, monitor requests, access cookies in open tabs, take screenshots of open websites and access the data that you pasted in your clipboard. Also the background pages by default can call NPAPI plugins. 8. Permissions listed upon installation Similar of what mobile applications on most platforms do, Extensions have Permissions which are displayed to the user and requires user agreement. 9. Attacking Extensions So, extensions are HTML applications and there are a lot of them. We also know that one of most dangerous HTML vulnerabilities is XSS. View page DOM XSS was a really, really bad thing last year and after some research I discovered a lot of extensions vulnerable to DOM XSS. Basically, when you design web applications, no matter if they are chrome extensions or websites it’s easier to write a vulnerable code. Than a safe one. 10. How does a typical XSS take place? In this article I will focus on vectors employing a malicious website. The model is users have a vulnerable extension installed and visit a malicious website which tries to exploit the extension. Are far scarier but not that common it’s when you have NPAPI plugin and binary code vulnerabilities inside. Usually looks like this: Malicious payload in a DOM > gets transferred to the content script > then transferred to the view page and then the view page accesses the method that is exported by NPAPI plugin. NPAPI plugins are simply binary code so as long they have some binary vulnerabilities like command injection or buffer overflow or format string vulnerabilities, we can exploit it, from the webpage. The interesting thing is the code executed in NPAPI plugin runs with just user permissions. 1. BeFF – fake flash update module 2. XSSCHEF – Chrome extension exploitation framework 3. Mosquito – Chrome extension exploitation tool Practice for certification success with the Skillset library of over 100,000 practice test questions. We analyze your responses and can determine when you are ready to sit for the test. Along your journey to exam readiness, we will: 1. Determine which required skills your knowledge is sufficient 2. Which required skills you need to work on 3. Recommend specific skills to practice on next 4. Track your progress towards a certification exam
http://resources.infosecinstitute.com/owned-by-chrome-extensions/
#1 A Guy Windows 7 Home Premium x64 SP1 40,099 posts Bay Area Peninsula Malwarebytes Anti-exploit 0.09.5.0250 Preview Quote: The changelog is the following: � Added new techniques for protection from stage1 exploits. � Added new techniques for protection from stage2 exploits. � Added new technique for stage1 and stage2 memory protections. � Added new hooking of certain Windows 8.x specific functions. � Added more verbose logging. � Fixed bug with Acrobat Reader shield. � Fixed bug installing MBAE in x64 systems where WinDir is in non-C drive. � Fixed bug "missing MSVCP100D.DLL" when uninstalling MBAE. � Fixed bug with excluding HitmanPro. Alert upgrades. � Fixed bug with negative shielded applications counter.
http://www.sevenforums.com/system-security/316755-malwarebytes-anti-exploit-0-09-5-0250-preview.html
Sharon D. Nelson is president of the digital forensics, information technology, and information security firm Sensei Enterprises. In addition... John W. Simek John W. Simek is vice president of the digital forensics and security firm Sensei Enterprises. He is a nationally... Subscribe via with Intermedia’s cloud. It keeps our material completely safe and secure and helps prevent these kinds of problems. Also, since it isn’t onsite, you are even protected in the event of your computer crashing. I remember years ago, when my computer died, I had to pay for data recovery services, and with the cloud you don’t need to worry about that.
http://legaltalknetwork.com/podcasts/digital-detectives/2013/12/data-breaches-healthcare-industry-lessons-law-firms/
SAFETY AND RISK MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS2Train Accident in the UKHazards and risks are part and parcel of everyday living both at the workplace and in theprivate space. Hazards can be defined as conditions that have the potential to cause illness, injuryand deaths. It can also end up with damage of goods and equipment and disrupt operations. Riskcan broadly be defined as the probability that hazard will occur and cause injury. Workplaces arereplete with hazards which are attendant with operations of production. Risk and safetymanagement can therefore refer to the sets of processes that are used in formulating andimplementing actions to mitigate hazards that are identified. The safety and risk managementare dependent on the state legislation and policies that govern the Occupational Health andSafety Plan of each country. The risk and safety policies on train accidents in the UK worksunder directives set by the EU and transposed into law in the UK.Background on Train Risk and Safety Management in UKThe European Union (EU) policy framework on occupational safety and health (2014-2020) provides the basic framework which has been legislated into law in the UK (EUR-Lex,2017). The policy defines rules and structures on occupational risks, prevention and safer workenvironment promotion. The EU further sets out specific regulations that govern the risk andsafety management of train operations amongst all member states. Regulation 2016/796 of theEuropean Agency for Railways (ERA) states that guaranteeing high levels of railway transportare part of its core mandate (Biennial Report, 2016, p.1). The agency works with Member statesand industry stakeholders in monitoring performance in safety in a multidimensional approach tosafety (Kozuch, &Sienkiewicz-Malyjurek, 2017). Data collected is shared with the NationalSafety Authorities and investigative bodies of each member state. In the UK the office of Rail and Road is tasked with giving oversight to the railwaysector. Health and safety issues are comprehensively addressed by this office (ORR, 2017). SAFETY AND RISK MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS3Passenger safety information such as gaps on platforms and stepping distances are provided. Statistics and data are also available on signals, rolling stock, level crossings, train protection andcrime. Under the 1974 Health and Safety at Work, investigative and enforcement authority wasconferred to this office (ORR, 2017).This aims to ensure that safety is undertaken as a multi-disciplinary approach (Crutchfield &Roughton, 2013, p. 3).Occupational health guidance andadvice to railway stakeholders is also given. Strategy and guidance on railway operations arealso set out by this office. This agency is also tasked with giving annual reports on safety andhealth performance on Britain’s Railway. Train Accident- Grimston Lane footpath crossing February 2016The information on the train accident was retrieved from a report given by the RailAccident Investigation Branch (RAIB). A pedestrian was struck and killed by a train whilecrossing the Lane footpath level crossing in Suffolk (Trimley). The accident happened onTuesday at 12:19 hours and involved a train traveling from Ipswich whose destination wasFelixstowe. According to the report, the pedestrian acknowledged hearing the train horn signalby raising his arm. The accident was caused probably by misjudging the time he needed to crossbefore the train reached him. He could also have misjudged the time that the train would take toreach him (Romanowska, Jamroz, Kustra, 2017).Another assumption that was posited is that hemay not have been able to clearly see the train before deciding to cross. He could also not beaware of the train because of the misalignment of the crossing. The victim was 82 year old Stanley Sawyer and is classified as “vulnerable users” by theNetwork Rails guidelines (RAIB, 2016, p.14). The victim had was under medication fordementia which had been diagnosed earlier. The crossing which the deceased use was skewedand did not cross the railway line at an angle of 90 degrees. This increased marginally the length
https://desklib.com/document/safety-risk-management-system/
LAFAYETTE, IN – (March 20th, 2017) – Passageways, the leader in secure collaboration for boards and leadership teams, today announced the appointment of Bill Arnold as Chief Information Security Officer (CISO). Arnold has more than twenty years of experience in leadership roles in Information Security & Technology. These leadership roles include as the Chief Information Officer at Service Credit Union and Vice President of Information Technology at Purdue Federal. Arnold joins Passageways at a pivotal time as it continues the drive to set new standards for the collaboration and security capabilities of electronic board portals. Said Arnold, “Throughout my career I’ve learnt the important lesson that cybersecurity is much more than just a technology fix—it’s a risk management issue. When we focus singularly on the technology we sometimes lose sight of the real goal. This role is about managing the risk to the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the information Passageways’ technology supports. In this role, I hope to continue shaping the cybersecurity policies and conversation by aligning Passageways with today’s risk management best practices.” Paroon Chadha, Passageways Co-Founder & CEO, commented “I’m delighted Bill has joined the Passageways team in this newly created role of CISO. We are committed to helping our clients meet today’s complex information security challenges without compromising on their user experience. Bill’s knowledge and experience will add to Passageways’ strengths in this critical field and be of immense value to the Passageways community. I look forward to Bill’s contribution to furthering Passageways strong security record and operational excellence.” Strong cybersecurity depends on robust policies, secure networks and systems and, importantly, a team of highly skilled cybersecurity talent. Bill will play a central role in helping to ensure the right set of policies, strategies, and practices are adopted across Passageways and help us lead in the Secure Collaboration Space.
http://www.passageways.com/blog/chief-information-security-officer/
California state government is in the middle of an 11-year project, executed in five waves, to create a central financial platform that will attempt to streamline 2,500 legacy financial systems used across more than 120 departments. As the first wave breaks across the horizon, the Financial Information System for California (FI$Cal) is running one year behind schedule and will cost 9% more than its projected $616.8 million price tag. California State Auditor Elaine Howle noted FI$Cal’s new January projection in a report (pdf) this week to Governor Jerry Brown and the Legislature. Howle said the project’s system integrator, Accenture, has not included state employees in the process and fails to provide adequate documentation of software configurations. Part of the problem, she said is about one-third of the system integrator staff work offshore. Other Accenture employees are working in off-hours when state workers aren’t around. This could “result in dependence on a vendor to maintain FI$Cal,” Howle wrote. Most of the software programs being used in the project are off-the-shelf commercial products that need few modifications. They will be used for accounting, procurement and cash management. But software that will replace the current process for creating the governor’s budget and legislative budget documents is not. That software is proprietary and requires significant configuration. Apparently, it has not gone well. “The budgeting function was experiencing instability issues, which it primarily attributed to the system integrator improperly performing installation tasks,” Howle wrote. The IV&V indicated that the nature of the errors encountered suggests that the system integrator may have been learning the software for the budget function while building it.” As the project advances, the state has shifted the timetable for when particular government entities are included. As a result of changes detailed in the project’s fifth special report last month, announcing the one-year delay, the number of departments being hooked up in the fourth wave ballooned from 45 to 68. “Our IT expert believes that including so many departments in a single wave may overwhelm the project’s resources,” Howle warned. The result could mean that “full implementation of FI$Cal will be delayed beyond July 2017 and the project’s cost will increase.” Howle chastised the lawmakers for ignoring three suggestions to track costs she made in her April 2012 report. “We are unaware of any legislative action to address our recommendations, however, we believe they are still valid,” Howle wrote, so she repeated them at the end of her letter. FI$Cal is one of the state’s largest and most complex IT projects, many of which have famously gone wrong. A new payroll system for In-Home Support Services workers was deemed an “unmitigated disaster” in 2012 and the court system is just beginning to grapple with the demise of its $1 billion California Court Case Management System (CCMS). The state spent $500 million on a system linking all 58 Superior Courts with law enforcement, the public and 70 different computers systems, before finally cutting it loose. –Ken Broder
http://www.allgov.com/usa/ca/news/controversies/states-new-fical-computer-system-is-running-a-year-late-and-over-budget-140227?news=852544
It occurred to us that, while Wells Fargo experienced a “single point of failure” the other day, they were almost certainly passed on their latest FDIC IT Security Examination. They probably also had an outside audit firm come in and examine them. My question is how can Wells Fargo pass an FDIC IT exam and still experience a catastrophic failure? Like most (rhetorical) questions, there’s an answer. The FDIC exams have, in our experience (50 community banks and a few larger ones) gotten more and more bureaucratic over the past few years, just as the technical security requirements have risen exponentially. We notice more and more emphasis on whether policies and procedures are written down, whether the bank has activity logs, whether there’s a disaster recovery plan, a documented vendor management plan, etc., rather than how the bank actually follows the policies, acts to recover from a disaster, analyses the logs, chooses vendors, or follows IT security procedures on a day-to-day basis. Now, it’s difficult to imagine that the FDIC (or the FFIEC, or any of the state banking departments) would choose to accept responsibility for something as subjective as an examination of a bank’s actual electronic security, but it is becoming more and more important. When we perform an IT examination, we cover what’s covered on the various regulatory examinations, but we do a far more in-depth analysis of the business’ actual ability to prevent hacks, intrusions and system wide outages. We were actually criticized by an examiner for being too thorough! Fortunately (for us), after the examination, he re-thought our audit and admitted that it was a pretty good evaluation of the bank’s security position. So, I guess my point is, make sure that you and your data are REALLY secure…it’s up to you, not an examiner. After all, it’s your business (or job) at stake.
http://windowsitpro.com/print/systems-management/hey-fdic-what-about-wells-fargo
Email insiderArticles 53 followers Follow President and CEO of Mercury Computer Systems (MRCY) Mark Aslett sells 13,383 shares of MRCY on 08/18/2010 at an average price of $11.01 a share. Mercury Computer Systems has a market cap of $255.2 million; its shares were traded at around $10.78 with a P/E ratio of 12.4 and P/S ratio of 1.3. MRCY is in the portfolios of George Soros of Soros Fund Management LLC, Chuck Royce of Royce& Associates, Jim Simons of Renaissance Technologies LLC, James Barrow of Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss. CFO Recent Trades:Sell: SVP, CFO and Treasurer Robert Hult sold 1,050 shares of MRCY stock on 06/08/2010 at the average price of 10.33. Robert Hult owns at least 66,847 shares after this. This is the insider trade history vs. stock price of MRCY. For the complete insider trading history of MRCY, click here. Click to see the complete insider trading history of MRCYDirectors and Officers Recent Trades:Sell: SVP and GM, ACS Didier M C Thibaud sold 2,552 shares of MRCY stock on 06/08/2010 at the average price of 10.33. Didier M C Thibaud owns at least 117,776 shares after this. The price of the stock has increased by 4.36% since. Sell: SVP, Human Resources Craig A Saline sold 964 shares of MRCY stock on 06/08/2010 at the average price of 10.33. Craig A Saline owns at least 33,607 shares after this. CEO Buys, CFO Buys: Stocks that are bought by their CEO/CFOs. Insider Cluster Buys: Stocks that multiple company officers and directors have bought. Double Buys: Companies that both Gurus and Insiders are buying Triple Buys: Companies that both Gurus and Insiders are buying, and Company is buying back. » Take a Free Trial of Premium MembershipAbout the author:insiderGuruFocus - Stock Picks and Market Insight of Gurus Currently 3.50/512345 Rating: 3.5/5 (4 votes) Subscribe via Email Chat Room © 2004-2014 GuruFocus.com, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimers: GuruFocus.com is not operated by a broker, a dealer, or a registered investment adviser. Under no circumstances does any information posted on GuruFocus.com represent a recommendation to buy or sell a security. The information on this site, and in its related newsletters, is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, investment advice or recommendations. The gurus may buy and sell securities before and after any particular article and report and information herein is published, with respect to the securities discussed in any article and report posted herein. In no event shall GuruFocus.com be liable to any member, guest or third party for any damages of any kind arising out of the use of any content or other material published or available on GuruFocus.com, or relating to the use of, or inability to use, GuruFocus.com or any content, including, without limitation, any investment losses, lost profits, lost opportunity, special, incidental, indirect, consequential or punitive damages. Past performance is a poor indicator of future performance. The information on this site is in no way guaranteed for completeness, accuracy or in any other way. The gurus listed in this website are not affiliated with GuruFocus.com, LLC. Stock quotes provided by InterActive Data. Fundamental company data provided by Morningstar, updated daily.
http://www.gurufocus.com/news/105173/mercury-computer-systems-mrcy-president-and-ceo-mark-aslett-sells-13383-shares
Hack My Google Glass: Security's Next Big Worry?Wearable computing devices must strike a difficult balance between security and convenience. A recent episode involving Google Glass and malicious QR codes raises questions. Are wearable computing devices the new big security threat? That's one question lingering after Lookout Security last month detailed an insidious hack attack against Google Glass: Just by getting Glass to "see" a malicious QR code, an attacker could force a connection to a malicious Wi-Fi or Bluetooth connection, then eavesdrop on all communications. Admittedly, the attack wouldn't have triggered a countdown to global doom, but it did highlight the automated, promiscuous network-connecting habits of mobile devices, Glass included. Therein lies a problem with wearable computing devices: They lack either physical or virtual keyboards, and thus require a relatively greater degree of automation than your average Android device or iPhone. With that automation, however, comes the risk that the device may automatically do something bad, from either an information security or privacy perspective. [ Could a kill switch help? The Trouble With Smartphone Kill Switches. ] In some respects, this is a good problem for the wearable computing field to have. For years, it was hobbled by awkward input mechanisms -- corded keyboards, joysticks, trackballs. But in this age of small, high-speed processors, voice recognition and relatively ubiquitous Internet connectivity, the release of Google Glass inaugurated people literally being able to tell their glasses what to do. Unfortunately, as the Glass QR vulnerability -- patched by Google in June -- illustrates, wearable computing faces still some tricky security and privacy questions. Furthermore, useful solutions to these problems may not yet be on hand. One problem is user authentication. For starters, unlike a smartphone, Google Glass doesn't offer access restrictions based on passwords or a PIN. That means a thief could easily access any Google account tied to a stolen device, warns InformationWeek columnist Jerry Irvine, who's a member of the National Cyber Security Task Force. Cue the need for restricting what these "bring your own" (BYOD) devices can do, and when. "If an organization doesn't have a BYOD strategy, the emergence of Glass can be a compelling argument to get one in place," said Irvine, who's also the CIO of Prescient Solutions. Security managers will have many more options when such devices get rolled out by the IT department and tied to being used in specific environments. For example, Duncan Stewart, a research director at Deloitte, told the BBC that wearable computers could be especially useful for workers in environments that don't currently allow for smartphone use. "Someone driving a forklift in a warehouse can't use a PC or smartphone because they will crash into someone," Stewart said. "But imagine if they can drive around and be able to pinpoint a pallet and then the particular box they need on that pallet." There are numerous security risks that could be blocked outright in that scenario. "There's a difference between a general use computer and a specialty use computer," Bob Rosenberg, CTO of startup facilities management service BluQRux, said in a phone interview. The latter, notably, can by heavily locked down, for example to only allow a white list of approved apps to be installed, and to block access to any website except for a preapproved list. CVE-2012-3946Published: 2014-04-24Cisco IOS before 15.3(2)S allows remote attackers to bypass interface ACL restrictions in opportunistic circumstances by sending IPv6 packets in an unspecified scenario in which expected packet drops do not occur for "a small percentage" of the packets, aka Bug ID CSCty73682. CVE-2012-5723Published: 2014-04-24Cisco ASR 1000 devices with software before 3.8S, when BDI routing is enabled, allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via crafted (1) broadcast or (2) multicast ICMP packets with fragmentation, aka Bug ID CSCub55948. CVE-2013-6738Published: 2014-04-24Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in IBM SmartCloud Analytics Log Analysis 1.1 and 1.2 before 1.2.0.0-CSI-SCALA-IF0003 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via an invalid query parameter in a response from an OAuth authorization endpoint. CVE-2014-0188Published: 2014-04-24The openshift-origin-broker in Red Hat OpenShift Enterprise 2.0.5, 1.2.7, and earlier does not properly handle authentication requests from the remote-user auth plugin, which allows remote attackers to bypass authentication and impersonate arbitrary users via the X-Remote-User header in a request to... CVE-2014-2391Published: 2014-04-24The password recovery service in Open-Xchange AppSuite before 7.2.2-rev20, 7.4.1 before 7.4.1-rev11, and 7.4.2 before 7.4.2-rev13 makes an improper decision about the sensitivity of a string representing a previously used but currently invalid password, which allows remote attackers to obtain potent... To save this item to your list of favorite Dark Reading content so you can find it later in your Profile page, click the "Save It" button next to the item. If you found this interesting or useful, please use the links to the services below to share it with other readers. You will need a free account with each service to share an item via that service.
http://www.darkreading.com/vulnerabilities-and-threats/hack-my-google-glass-securitys-next-big-worry/d/d-id/1111278?cid=sbx_bigdata_related_slideshow_vulnerabilities_and_threats_big_data&itc=sbx_bigdata_related_slideshow_vulnerabilities_and_threats_big_data
Another area to watch: Cloud-service brokerages. In the near future, cloud-service gateways will become a key way that CIOs can manage their company's use of cloud services, reigning in the shadow information-technology that undermines companies' security, says Pingree. "Business groups are swiping their credit cards and going around IT, and they represent risk to the organization," he says. "Anything that helps the CIO gain visibility into that ... companies are looking at." CVE-2012-3946Published: 2014-04-24Cisco IOS before 15.3(2)S allows remote attackers to bypass interface ACL restrictions in opportunistic circumstances by sending IPv6 packets in an unspecified scenario in which expected packet drops do not occur for "a small percentage" of the packets, aka Bug ID CSCty73682. CVE-2012-5723Published: 2014-04-24Cisco ASR 1000 devices with software before 3.8S, when BDI routing is enabled, allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via crafted (1) broadcast or (2) multicast ICMP packets with fragmentation, aka Bug ID CSCub55948. CVE-2013-6738Published: 2014-04-24Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in IBM SmartCloud Analytics Log Analysis 1.1 and 1.2 before 1.2.0.0-CSI-SCALA-IF0003 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via an invalid query parameter in a response from an OAuth authorization endpoint. CVE-2014-0188Published: 2014-04-24The openshift-origin-broker in Red Hat OpenShift Enterprise 2.0.5, 1.2.7, and earlier does not properly handle authentication requests from the remote-user auth plugin, which allows remote attackers to bypass authentication and impersonate arbitrary users via the X-Remote-User header in a request to... CVE-2014-2391Published: 2014-04-24The password recovery service in Open-Xchange AppSuite before 7.2.2-rev20, 7.4.1 before 7.4.1-rev11, and 7.4.2 before 7.4.2-rev13 makes an improper decision about the sensitivity of a string representing a previously used but currently invalid password, which allows remote attackers to obtain potent... To save this item to your list of favorite Dark Reading content so you can find it later in your Profile page, click the "Save It" button next to the item. If you found this interesting or useful, please use the links to the services below to share it with other readers. You will need a free account with each service to share an item via that service.
http://www.darkreading.com/risk/slide-show-10-security-service-startups-to-remember-in-2012/d/d-id/1138826?cid=sbx_dr_related_mostpopular_default_mobile_security&itc=sbx_dr_related_mostpopular_default_mobile_security
just sign in with your email to view. ---Note: You'll need to sign into Google Drive with your email address.
http://phishing.it.umn.edu/2015/01/
Banks have been getting off too easily. Now, the government is pushing to make them accountable for any wrongdoing. Regulators and prosecutors have been long criticized for failing to hold financial institutions accountable for their mistakes or their outright wrongdoing. This could finally be set to change, if the Justice Department has its way. In the past, authorities have avoided being too harsh on banks, fearing that financial institutions could suffer irreparable damage as a result of punishment, which would in turn jeopardize the broader economy. [ Regrets? Some Senators Have a Few .] As a result, the government has largely imposed ineffective fines and regulation, without holding banks accountable for their misdeeds. A few recent examples: HSBC last year avoided charges in a massive money laundering case out of concern that an indictment could put the bank out of business, according to the New York Times. Prosecutors also considered filing criminal charges against an arm of Barclays, the paper reports, but ultimately did not because of the bank’s vital importance to the financial system. But now, the government is adopting a new strategy to rein in wrongdoing, and pushing for guilty pleas in financial fraud cases. As a result, lawyers for several big banks are now urging banks to fire employees suspected of wrongdoing in the hope of appeasing authorities, the New York Times says. It’s a long road ahead. So far, the government’s new drive has had some underwhelming results to say the least. The Justice Department to date has extracted a guilty plea only out of the remote subsidiaries of big foreign banks – namely the Japanese subsidiaries of UBS and the Royal Bank of Scotland, who were accused of manipulating interest rates to boost profits. The Japanese subsidiaries pleaded guilty to felony wire fraud, and their parent companies suffered reputational damage, but not much else. Still, the Times notes that by going after a subsidiary, prosecutors “shield the parent company from losing its license, but still send a warning to the financial industry.” In the meantime, it will remain to be seen whether opposition by regulators, who are anxious of doing anything to banks that might harm the economy, as well as lobbying by Wall Street, will thwart the govenrment’s efforts. But it is clear that banks have been getting off too easily. Hopefully, by ramping up efforts to make financial institutions accountable for their executives’ wrongdoing, there will be less fraud and less market manipulation, which ultimately can only be a good thing for the capital markets and the economy at large. Melanie Rodier has worked as a print and broadcast journalist for over 10 years, covering business and finance, general news, and film trade news. Prior to joining Wall Street & Technology in April 2007, Melanie lived in Paris, where she worked for the International Herald ... View Full Bio To save this item to your list of favorite Wall Street & Technology content so you can find it later in your Profile page, click the "Save It" button next to the item. If you found this interesting or useful, please use the links to the services below to share it with other readers. You will need a free account with each service to share an item via that service.
http://www.wallstreetandtech.com/risk-management/justice-department-works-on-new-model-to-prosecute-banks/d/d-id/1267755?cid=sbx_wallstreetandtech_related_mostpopular_vulnerabilities_and_threats_quickview&itc=sbx_wallstreetandtech_related_mostpopular_vulnerabilities_and_threats_quickview
Messenger, one of the most popular messaging apps, is ramping up its testing of default end-to-end encryption. All messages sent through the app will be completely secure and confidential, ensuring that no one else can read or access them. The company has been working on this feature for some time and is now ready to put it into action. End-to-end encryption is a security measure that ensures that only the sender and receiver of a message can read it. This prevents any third parties from having access to the content of the message, ensuring that it is kept private. Messenger's move to use this encryption by default is an important one, as it ensures that any messages sent through the app are completely safe and secure. The company is striving to ensure the encryption is simple to use so that users don't need to manually activate it every time they want to send a protected message. This makes the process of sending and receiving secure messages much more convenient and user-friendly. Messenger's move to use default end-to-end encryption is an important step in keeping user data secure. This ensures that all messages sent through the app are kept private and secure and that users don't have to manually activate the encryption each time they want to send a message. With this new feature, Messenger is making sure that all of its user's data is safe and secure.
https://goociti.com/blog/amazing-news/messenger-app-tests-default-end-to-end-encryption
illuminating discussions about Apple and its products. Product coverage includes Apple Watch, Mac, iPhone, iPad, Apple Pay, Apple TV. Jim Lynch is a technology analyst and online community manager who has also written for many leading industry publications over the years, including ITworld, InfoWorld, CIO, PCMag, ExtremeTech, and numerous others. The opinions expressed in this blog are those of Jim Lynch and do not necessarily represent those of IDG Communications, Inc., its parent, subsidiary or affiliated companies. Newsletters Sign up and receive the latest news, reviews and trends on your favorite technology topics. Get our Daily News newsletter Go How to run your small business with free open source software From alternatives to Microsoft Office to full-blown ERP systems, open source software can provide free...
http://www.cio.com/article/3054559/mobile/why-i-dumped-the-iphone-6s-for-the-6s-plus.html
What did Google do to make Android 4.4 KitKat work better on lower powered... The Age of the API is upon us, presenting developers with new opportunities to generate income by linking to the data and services of others. But developers need to be careful when navigating the new API landscape.
http://www.cio.com/article/2380988/developer/the-risks-and-rewards-of-the-age-of-apis.html
Well, we're here to let you in on a little secret. It's because they know how to write WMI scripts and you don't! Actually, that's a lie. The truth is, learning how to write WMI scripts is not going to make you rich and famous (we just wish someone had told us that before we took this job). On the other hand, Windows Management Instrumentation (WMI) Sorry to disappoint you, but, no, we haven’t. In fact, if you’ve ever browsed through the Script Center, you’ve likely had two reactions. At first you say, “Wow, look at all these scripts!” But then, after catching your breath, you probably add “Wait a second. Where are the WMI scripts that return information about video cards? Where are the WMI scripts
http://windowsitpro.com/print/windows/jsi-tip-8625-scriptomatic-tool
According to multiple sources, hackers have released the HDCP 'master key' this week, cracking the copy protection permanently. High-Bandwidth Digital Content Protection's main focus is to stop the unencrypted transmission of high definition video content from a source like a Blu-ray player and a display monitor / TV set. HDCP is used with the Digital Video Interface (DVI), DisplayPort and High Definition Multimedia Interface (HDMI) . HDCP is required for all equipment that uses a HDMI connection. Since HDCP is a proprietary technology, it requires a license to be implemented and as part of the license agreement, a manufacturer must agree to limit the capabilities of the other video outputs on a device. This means that in effect, a movie disc can instruct a source player to downgrade the video quality if a user attempts to transmit high definition video content through a connection that doesn't feature HDCP. With the master key released, anyone can now create their own source/sink keys. Realistically, this means that now your computer can be a DVR...and the files it records can be played back anywhere. It also means that instead of paying $350 for a crummy ATI cablecard tunder, you can use a $100 tuner with a descrambler box to do the same job, better. It also means that if you have some old POS TV; or maybe a HDMI receiver that does not have HDCP support; you can actually use it...at full quality rather than the SD quality that it reverts to without HDCP. If you want to record full-HD quality gameplay from your PS3, it is now possible...or at least it will be once there are 50,000 people selling the black boxes on ebay. I am sure there are a lot of other applications as well...these are just a few of them.
http://www.afterdawn.com/news/article.cfm/2010/09/15/hdcp_encryption_permanently_cracked
You currently have javascript disabled. Several functions may not work. Please re-enable javascript to access full functionality. Register a free account to unlock additional features at BleepingComputer.com Welcome to BleepingComputer, a free community where people like yourself come together to discuss and learn how to use their computers. Using the site is easy and fun. As a guest, you can browse and view the various discussions in the forums, but can not create a new topic or reply to an existing one unless you are logged in. Other benefits of registering an account are subscribing to topics and forums, creating a blog, and having no ads shown anywhere on the site. Click here to Register a free account now! or read our Welcome Guide to learn how to use this site. hello all I have a problem. I start my computer an HP laptop on windows 7 home pro. i keep having my default broswer ( first was chrome, now its Firefox and no matter what i keep getting multiple tabs on this site hhere https://fbcdn-photos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/hellocdn.html?v=1 i already ran a ful scan with makware antimalwarebytes and it found no results, I restarted PC and it did it again. PLEASE< PLEASE HELP!
http://www.bleepingcomputer.com/forums/t/505458/malware-i-think-help/
Itself a home of security experts who are #EngineeredToDoGood for Filipinos, Trend Micro has been holding DECODE for five years now, allowing opportunities not only for networking but also for empowering and inspiring cybersecurity professionals to continuously seek growth and new knowledge to enhance the cybersecurity industry as a whole. Now in its fifth year, DECODE 2021’s lineup will feature six keynote speakers across 32 virtual sessions to cater to some 2,000 participants. With the theme DECODE 2021: DEC1DE. DEC0DE, this year’s conference will highlight time as a factor in effective decision-making with regard to threat prevention and resolution. It will also equip professionals with the knowledge needed to isolate and assess risks from the get-go. This year’s keynote speakers include Alexandru Caciuloiu, the UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) cybercrime project coordinator from, to talk about how cybercrime is evolving and growing in Southeast Asia, and Shane Cross, Cybercrime Directorate of INTERPOL Global Complex for Innovation (IGCI) INTERPOL’s head of the Cybercrime Intelligence Unit, who will be discussing cybercrime through the lens of law enforcement. Other speakers include Jay Yaneza, Trend Micro’s director of Managed XDR, Mel T. Migriño, Meralco’s VP and group chief information security officer (CISO), Christina Lekati, Cyber Risk GmbH’s social engineering security specialist, Lauren Seawright, FBI Cyber Division Intelligence Analyst, and David Sancho, Trend Micro’s senior threat researcher. Trend Micro is also bringing back its lineup of tracks, titled “The Digital Frontier, No More Secrets, Business Unusual, and Securing the Security Landscape”. The four tracks cover various topics and will also feature multiple guest speakers. Participants can opt to attend any of the sessions during their designated time slots during the three-day event. The “Digital Frontier” track is focused on the risks and threats of the latest technological advancements in cybersecurity such as artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML). Under the “No More Secrets” track, speakers will look into trends and challenges related to data privacy, security, and compliance. For those interested in cybercrime and forensic techniques across the computing environment, the tracks “Business Unusual” and “Securing the Security Landscape” will cater to participants’ curiosity and introduce the most recent studies in the field and notable cybercrime investigations, respectively. The third day of this year’s conference will feature a special itinerary for women and students to highlight women empowerment in the tech industry. The itinerary is made possible through Trend Micro’s “Get IT Girl!” program, as well as discussions on “Careers in Cybersecurity,” and “Cybersecurity Fundamentals,” which are tailored for students and other individuals looking to shift into the cybersecurity industry. Following last year’s transition into a virtual conference, DECODE 2021 will feature virtual lounges for participants to network and meet fellow experts between sessions to simulate the on-site networking from previous DECODE conferences. The sessions will also remain accessible to participants online for up to one year after the conference. Participants will only need to input their registration details to access material from the conference for free. For the past five years, Trend Micro has been bringing together IT professionals from all over the globe through DECODE, an independent pursuit that aims to contribute and improve the IT and cybersecurity industry without looking to earn any profit. The free conference is an opportunity for experts to broaden their horizons and engage with one another as active members of the industry.
https://cebufinest.com/trend-micro-to-hold-decode-2021-cybersecurity-learning-conference-in-november-for-free/
MOVEit provides secure collaboration and automated file transfers of sensitive data and advanced workflow automation capabilities without the need for scripting. Encryption and activity tracking enable compliance with regulations such as PCI, HIPAA and GDPR. MOVEit can be accessed via an API or the provided web interface that can be accessed over HTTPS. A SQL injection vulnerability has been reported for MOVEit Transfer. A remote, unauthenticated attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted request to the target server. A successful attack may result in arbitrary SQL command execution against the database on the target server. The overall CVSS score is 8.5 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S: U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:U/RL:O/RC:C). Base score is 9.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H), based on the following metrics: • Impact of this vulnerability on data confidentiality is high. • Impact of this vulnerability on data integrity is high. • Impact of this vulnerability on data availability is high. Temporal score is 8.5 (E:U/RL:O/RC:C), based on the following metrics: • The exploit code maturity level of this vulnerability is unproven. • The remediation level of this vulnerability is official fix. • The report confidence level of this vulnerability is confirmed. This vulnerability is due to flawed input validation sent to the endpoints “/moveitsapi.dll” and “/guestaccess.aspx”. The “/moveitisapi/moveitisapi.dll” will process requests with a parameter named action with a value “m2”. When processing such a request the server expects the “X-siLock-Transaction “(case-sensitive) header to be set to “folder_add_by_path” to process the request, The server will then pass the request to “/machine2.aspx”. The “/machine2.aspx” resource is meant to be used internally by various MOVEit components to manage “high speed” file transfers. However, if the string “X-siLock-Transaction: folder_add_by_path” is found in another header the “/moveitisapi/moveitisapi.dll” resource will continue to process the request and pass it to “/machine2.aspx”. The “/machine2.aspx” resource will then process the request based on the value of the actual “”XsiLock-Transaction” header. An attacker can set the “X-siLock-Transaction” header value to “session_setvars” which will lead to the SetAllSessionVarsFromHeaders() method of the SILHttpSessionWrapper class to be called. The SetAllSessionVarsFromHeaders() method will process each HTTP header with the name “X-siLockSessVar” (case-sensitive) and attempt to set the associated HTTP session variable related to the value of the header. For example the header: X-siLock-SessVar: MyPkgSelfProvisionedRecips: [email protected] This will set the session variable MyPkgSelfProvisionedRecips, which controls the recipients of a data package, to the value “[email protected]”. When a guest user is in the process of sending a data package a request can be sent to the “/machine2.apsx” endpoint via “/moveitisapi/moveitisapi.dll” that will update the value of session variables. Then when the final data package is sent via form submission to the “/guestaccess.aspx” endpoint the updated session variables will be used allowing an attacker to update the recipients email address to contain SQL injection characters. When the form is submitted the method GetHTML() loads the updated session variables and calls the MsgPostForGuest() method from the class MOVEit. DMZ.ClassLib. MsgEngine. The method will call the UserGetSelfProvisionUserRecipsWithEmailAddress() method from the MOVEit. DMZ.ClassLib. UserEngine class which will then call the UserGetUsersWithEmailAddress() method. The UserGetUsersWithEmailAddress() method will build an SQL statement by concatenating the updated recipient email address to the query string without performing any sanitation and then execute the SQL query. • Filtering traffic based on the signature above. • Upgrading the product to a non-vulnerable version.
https://securitynews.sonicwall.com/xmlpost/moveit-sql-injection-vulnerability/
Create an account to access more content and features on IEEE Spectrum, including the ability to save articles to read later, download Spectrum Collections, and participate in conversations with readers and editors. For more exclusive content and features, consider Joining IEEE. Join the world’s largest professional organization devoted to engineering and applied sciences and get access to all of Spectrum’s articles, archives, PDF downloads, and other benefits. Learn more → It’s another month, and another major IT-related security problem has been uncovered. The latest, the security flaws discovered in Intel, AMD, and AMR chips that can allow the bypassing of operating system security protections, are a bit different than most vulnerabilities. They are hardware rather than software-based, and their impacts are exceptionally widespread, impacting nearly every Intel processor made since the mid-1990s. Billions of chips in total could be affected. Intel, in conjunction with AMD, ARM, operating system vendors, and others, has been working on software and firmware security updates to close the security holes, with mixed success. There were reports that Intel’s firmware update had a bug that needed fixing itself, and that there were problems with updates on some AMD-based machines. There is also a debate between Intel and Microsoft regarding whether some of the updates would result in a significant slowdown of a patched machine. Intel insists the fixes will likely cause minimal performance impacts for most users, while a Microsoft executive instead seemed to suggest that users might be better off not updating their machines if loss of performance was greater than the security gained. Intel has been downplaying not only the performance impacts of the fixes but the financial impacts as well, even going so far as to say the flaws will have no material impact on the company’s finances. That is rather amazing: Billions of products sold with two fundamental security flaws that need urgent correction and the result isn’t seen as being material. It leads to the question of what would need to happen for an IT security issue to become material, not only to Intel but to all U.S. corporations. The IT security breach most in the U.S. news media before the Intel et al. chip flaw was the Equifax breach, where the personal credit information of some 145 million Americans was compromised. That breach, along with others at health insurance company Anthem and retailer Target spurred the U.S. Congress to hold multiple hearings, with politicians on both sides of the aisle promising that new laws would be quickly passed to force companies to protect citizens’ private data. I hope you didn’t hold your breath waiting for that to happen. The only major proposed legislation so far is that offered last week by Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Mark Warner (D-Va.) that would hold large credit card companies accountable for data breaches of consumer information. They propose that the companies would face “a base penalty of $100 for each consumer who had one piece of personal identifying information (PII) compromised and another $50 for each additional PII compromised per consumer,” according to their press release. The likelihood of the proposed legislation being passed is about zero. No one should be surprised, either. The current administration isn’t particularly interested in increasing business regulation; to be fair, given the numerous past massive data breaches, previous administrations, both Republican and Democrat, weren’t overly aggressive in applying the plethora of existing legislation [PDF] to penalize companies for data breaches. It took 11 years before the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services fined a health service provider for a privacy violation of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), for example. That was still faster than the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, which took 15 years before it finally fined a financial institution for a data breach, something it has had the statutory power to do since 2000. Mad with power, the SEC actually managed to fine another financial institution in 2016, but none in 2017; everyone is waiting to see what, if anything, the SEC does in regard to the Equifax breach. Even though U.S. government regulators routinely wimp out, one would think that the numerous class action lawsuits filed after a data breach would at least incentivize companies to take cybersecurity seriously. Anthem, for instance, agreed to pay $115 million to settle breach-related lawsuits against it. And then there are the stock market hits to consider as well, right? Well, it turns out that even successful lawsuits (and many are not) and hits to a company’s share price inflict very little long-term damage after the initial crisis occurs. Even then, the total impact to a company’s bottom line is usually not material. The financial hit of Target’s 2013 data breach turned out to be only about 0.1 percent of its 2014 sales, hardly an incentive to change corporate behavior. Back in 2004, security expert Bruce Schneier wrote a thoughtful essay for IEEE Computer titled “Hacking the Business Climate for Network Security,” in which he argued persuasively that “Real security improvement will only come through liability: holding software manufacturers accountable for the security and, more generally, the quality of their products.” His argument seems to have been taken more seriously in Europe than in the U.S., however. In May, the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) takes effect. The GDPR is meant to force companies to take EU citizens’ privacy and security concerns seriously. The incentives are the very significant financial penalties incurred for breaching its regulations, such as not reporting a data breach within 72 hours of its discovery. GDPR fines can range up to 4 percent of annual global turnover or € 20 million (whichever is greater). That has, to say the least, gotten the attention of everyone doing business in the EU, especially U.S. tech companies. Whether the GDPR will persuade U.S. corporations to take cybersecurity more seriously (or the U.S. government to start enforcing the legislation already on the books) remains to be seen, but one can always hope. Until then, we’ll all just have to put our faith in statements from corporate executives like Intel’s CEO Brian Krzanich, who claims that “Security is job No. 1 for Intel and our industry.” Of course, it would be nice if those reassuring words were said and actions were taken to prevent a security breach or flaw occurred before they were discovered, not after.
https://spectrum.ieee.org/will-us-corporations-ever-take-cybersecurity-seriously
TechSpot is celebrating its 25th anniversary. TechSpot means tech analysis and advice you can trust. Federal authorities are concerned after research has revealed that U.S. prisons are vulnerable to computer hackers, who could even be able to remotely open cell doors to aid jailbreaks. In a statement to the Washington Times, spokesman Chris Burke said the Federal Bureau of Prisons is "aware of this research and taking it very seriously." The security systems in most prisons run using special computer equipment that utilizes industrial control systems (ICS) – the same systems employed to control power plants, water treatment facilities and other critical infrastructure. ICS were in use in the Iranian nuclear power plant facility that was sabotaged successfully by the Stuxnet worm last year. "You could open every cell door, and the system would be telling the control room they are all closed," said John Strauchs, a former CIA officer when speaking at the recent Miami Hacker Halted convention recently. He provided assistance in a cyber attack on the simulated prison computer systems as part of the research. Strauchs, who is now a consultant aiding in the design of security systems for state and federal prisons, said it was even possible to destroy doors by overloading the electrical systems that control them, as well as crashing CCTV systems or shutting down prison-wide secure communications when attacking the security control systems that prisons employ. Sean McGurk, who headed the Department of Homeland Security's efforts to secure the ICS said the department had looked into the claims and had "validated the researchers' initial assertion that they could remotely reprogram and manipulate" the software controllers running in the system. Further investigations revealed that prison workers were actually using the secure systems to check personal emails, directly exposing them to potential hackers. In over 400 site inspections, researchers found every single facility had their systems connected to internet enabled networks. That said, Strauchs believes the mostly likely vector would be to bribe a prison guard to insert a USB drive with malicious programming, which could be ever harder to stop.
https://www.techspot.com/news/46148-research-reveals-prisons-at-risk-from-cyber-attacks.html
In the era of the Internet and dematerialization, companies can no longer do without a high-performance information system. However, the establishment of an IT infrastructure also involves the recruitment of personnel allocated to its maintenance. To avoid the expense of hiring a team of IT specialists, some SMEs are turning to outsource. However, this solution not only overcomes financial constraints but also helps the structure secure its information resources. Not benefiting from the same financial means as large companies, small structures must take all the necessary measures to compress expenses. One of these provisions consists, in particular, in calling on an IT service provider. For example, this subcontractor will take care of system monitoring and computer maintenance as part of an outsourcing service in this city. This solution allows the establishment to reduce costs by avoiding recruiting IT specialists. These professionals’ remuneration is high, and their hiring incurs significant expenses. To ensure the proper functioning of the computer system, it would also be necessary to set up a team of several people. By hiring the services of a service provider, the company has the know-how of a few competent technicians at a reasonable cost. Companies that work in IT outsourcing also offer hardware and software troubleshooting. If any breakdown occurs, the client establishment may request an emergency intervention. IT specialists will then go to the company’s headquarters to determine the cause of this problem. After that, they will make all necessary repairs to restore the running processes. Thanks to the responsiveness of the subcontractor, the manager will be able to avoid any interruption of activities and guarantee the company’s financial stability. Today, computer tools have also become essential in various sectors. Outsourcing is decision to strengthen IT security. Outsourcing service is not limited to the periodic maintenance of the IT infrastructure, and it is not only intended to facilitate internal management. Providers usually monitor all ongoing treatments. Thanks to server monitoring, subcontractors can watch for any suspicious processes. They will thus be able to react quickly if hackers target the brand. Information system security has been a concern for business leaders for several years. Studies show that 7 out of 10 companies go bankrupt after being hacked. Strengthening data security, therefore, amounts to guaranteeing the sustainability of the activities. With real expertise in this area, they can advise their clients. With the entry into force of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the assistance and explanations provided by these specialists will benefit business leaders. Indeed, the operations to be carried out to comply with the new legislation could be more apparent. In all cases, interested parties must choose their service providers wisely. Hence the interest in consulting the websites of several companies offering an outsourcing service before making your choice.
https://www.trendstechblog.com/it-security/
C:\Program Files\Common Files\McAfee\Core\mccoreps.dll Files\McAfee\MSC\mcmispps.dll Files\Logitech\Desktop Messenger\8876480\8.1.1.50-8876480SL\Program\backWeb.dll Files\Logitech\Desktop Messenger\8876480\8.1.1.50-8876480SL\Program\bwsec.dll Files\Logitech\Desktop Messenger\8876480\8.1.1.50-8876480SL\Program\clntutil.dll Files\Logitech\Desktop Messenger\8876480\Program\BWfiles-8876480.dll Files\Logitech\Desktop Messenger\8876480\8.1.1.50-8876480SL\Program\BWfiles.dll Files\Logitech\SetPoint\Macros\MacroCore.dll Files\Logitech\SetPoint\IMHook.dll Files\Logitech\SetPoint\WebBrowserSupport.dll C:\WINDOWS\WinSxS\x86_Microsoft. VC80.ATL_1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b_8.0.50727.42_x-ww_6e805841\ATL80.DLL Files\Logishrd\KHAL2\KhalApi.dll Files\Logitech\bluetooth\LBTServ.dll Files\Logitech\SetPoint\kgame.dll C:\Program Files\Common Files\Logishrd\KHAL2\KHALITCH.DLL Files\Logishrd\KHAL2\KHALMW.DLL Files\Logishrd\KHAL2\KHALHPP.DLL C:\WINDOWS\system32\WINMM.dll Files\Logishrd\KHAL2\KHALMOU.DLL Files\Logishrd\KHAL2\KHALHID.DLL Files\Logishrd\KHAL2\KHALUSB.DLL Files\Spyware Cease\opfile.dll Files\Spyware Cease\spkdll.dll ProcID:2060 C:\WINDOWS\ehome\ehrecvr.exe ProcID:2076 C:\WINDOWS\ehome\ehSched.exe ProcID:2132 C:\Program Files\Java\jre6\bin\jqs.exe ProcID:2228 C:\Program Files\McAfee\SiteAdvisor\McSACore.exe ProcID:2400 C:\PROGRA~1\McAfee\MSC\mcmscsvc.exe ProcID:2444 C:\PROGRA~1\McAfee\MSC\mcuimgr.exe ProcID:2556 C:\PROGRA~1\COMMON~1\McAfee\McProxy\McProxy.exe ProcID:2608 C:\PROGRA~1\McAfee\VIRUSS~1\Mcshield.exe ProcID:2688 C:\Program Files\McAfee\MPF\MpfSrv.exe ProcID:2764 C:\Program Files\McAfee\MSK\msksrver.exe ProcID:2856 C:\Program Files\Common Files\New Boundary\PrismXL\PRISMXL.SYS 7.0\Reader\BIB.dll 7.0\Reader\AcroRd32.dll 7.0\Reader\AGM.dll 7.0\Reader\CoolType.dll 7.0\Reader\plug_ins\DigSig.api 7.0\Reader\plug_ins\eBook.api 7.0\Reader\plug_ins\EScript.api SynTPLpr || C:\Program Files\Synaptics\SynTP\SynTPLpr.exe SynTPEnh || C:\Program Files\Synaptics\SynTP\SynTPEnh.exe QuickTime Task || "C:\Program Files\QuickTime\QTTask.exe" -atboottime mcagent_exe || C:\Program Files\McAfee.com\Agent\mcagent.exe /runkey SunJavaUpdateSched || "C:\Program Files\Java\jre1.6.0_07\bin\jusched.exe" CanonSolutionMenu || C:\Program Files\Canon\SolutionMenu\CNSLMAIN.exe /logon CanonMyPrinter || C:\Program Files\Canon\MyPrinter\BJMyPrt.exe /logon C:\Program Files\Synaptics\SynTP\SynTPLpr.exe C:\Program Files\Synaptics\SynTP\SynTPEnh.exe C:\Program Files\QuickTime\QTTask.exe C:\Program Files\McAfee.com\Agent\mcagent.exe C:\Program Files\Java\jre1.6.0_07\bin\jusched.exe C:\Program Files\Canon\MyPrinter\BJMyPrt.exe C:\WINDOWS\system32\ctfmon.exe C:\Program Files\Logitech\Desktop Messenger\8876480\Program\LogitechDesktopMessenger.exe C:\Program Files\Logitech\SetPoint\SetPoint.exe C:\Program Files\Common Files\Logishrd\KHAL2\KHALMNPR.EXE C:\Program Files\McAfee\VirusScan\McShield.exe C:\Program Files\McAfee\MPF\MPFSrv.exe C:\Program Files\McAfee\MSK\MskSrver.exe 1. - Download Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware (http://www.download.com/Malwarebytes-Anti-Malware/3000-8022_4-10804572.html?part=dl-10804572&subj=dl&tag=button) to your desktop. * Double-click mbam-setup.exe and follow the prompts to install the program. * At the end, be sure to checkmark the Update Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware and Launch Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware, then click Finish. * If an update is found, it will download and install the latest version. * Once the program has loaded, select Perform full scan, then click Scan. * When the scan is complete, click OK, then Show Results to view the results. * Be sure that everything is checked, and click Remove Selected. * When completed, a log will open in Notepad. Ok, I tried changing the file extention to .com and still nothing. I have the MBAM installed but when I double click to launch it, my cursor turns into an hour glass for three seconds and then goes away and nothing happens. Just me staring at the monitor like a dummy hoping and waiting for something to come up. I'm ready to give up on this dang thing and ask Santa to bring me a new one for Christmas. Now STOP all your monitoring programs (Antivirus/Antispyware, Guards and Shields) as they could easily interfere with ComboFix. Double click combofix.exe & follow the prompts. When finished, it will produce a log. Please save that log to post in your next reply along with a fresh HJT log Re-enable all the programs that were disabled during the running of ComboFix.. Note: Do not mouse-click combofix's window while it is running. That may cause it to stall. CF disconnects your machine from the internet. The connection is automatically restored before CF completes its run. If CF runs into difficulty and terminates prematurely, the connection can be manually restored by restarting your machine. 2008-09-01 15:32 72,456 ----a-w c:\documents and settings\Owner. PHIMMASONE\Application Data\GDIPFONTCACHEV1.DAT 2008-08-06 01:21 32,768 --sha-w c:\windows\system32\config\systemprofile\Local Settings\History\History. IE5\MSHist012008080520080806\index.dat [2001-07-09 155648] "QuickTime Task"="c:\program files\QuickTime\QTTask.exe" [2008-09-06 413696] "SunJavaUpdateSched"="c:\program files\Java\jre1.6.0_07\bin\jusched.exe" [2008-06-10 144784] "CanonSolutionMenu"="c:\program files\Canon\SolutionMenu\CNSLMAIN.exe" [2007-04-03 644696] [2007-01-08 20480] [2008-04-13 16:12] 2006-02-06 c:\windows\Tasks\ISP signup reminder 3.job - c:\windows\system32\OOBE\oobebaln.exe [2008-04-13 16:12] 2008-10-15 c:\windows\Tasks\McDefragTask.job - c:\program files\mcafee\mqc\QcConsol.exe [2007-12-04 12:32] 2008-12-01 c:\windows\Tasks\McQcTask.job - c:\program files\mcafee\mqc\QcConsol.exe [2007-12-04 12:32] FireFox -: Profile - c:\documents and settings\Owner. PHIMMASONE\Application Data\Mozilla\Firefox\Profiles\7o7ayljo.default\ FireFox -: prefs.js - STARTUP.HOMEPAGE - hxxp://www.msn.com/ PHIMMASONE\Application Data\Mozilla\plugins\npAbacast.dll FF -: plugin - c:\documents and settings\Owner. PHIMMASONE\Application Data\Mozilla\plugins\NPAbacheck.dll FF -: plugin - c:\program files\Adobe\Acrobat 7.0\Reader\browser\nppdf32.dll FF -: plugin - c:\program files\Mozilla Firefox\plugins\npdeploytk.dll c:\program files\McAfee\SiteAdvisor\saHook.dll c:\program files\Logitech\SetPoint\GameHook.dll C:\Program Files\McAfee\VirusScan\McShield.exe C:\Program Files\McAfee\MPF\MPFSrv.exe C:\Program Files\McAfee\MSK\MskSrver.exe C:\Program Files\BigFix\BigFix.exe C:\Program Files\Logitech\SetPoint\SetPoint.exe Note: the above code was created specifically for this user. If you are not this user, do NOT follow these directions as they could damage the workings of your system. 3. Save the above as CFScript.txt 4. Physically disconnect from the internet. 5. 6. Then drag the CFScript.txt into ComboFix.exe. This will start ComboFix again. 7. After reboot, (in case it asks to reboot), please post the following reports/logs into your next replyafter you re-enable all the programs that were disabled during the running of ComboFix: PHIMMASONE\Application IE5\MSHist012008080520080806\index.dat - 2008-12-15 19:25:34 32,768 ----a-w c:\windows\system32\config\systemprofile\Cookies\index.dat + 2008-12-17 01:50:42 32,768 ----a- w c:\windows\system32\config\systemprofile\Cookies\index.dat - 2008-12-15 19:25:34 32,768 ----a-w c:\windows\system32\config\systemprofile\Local Settings\History\History. IE5\index.dat + 2008-12-17 01:50:42 32,768 ----a-w c:\windows\system32\config\systemprofile\Local Settings\History\History. IE5\index.dat + 2008-12-17 02:44:42 16,384 ----atw c:\windows\Temp\Perflib_Perfdata_76c.dat "ehTray"="c:\windows\ehome\ehtray.exe" [2005-08-05 64512] "NeroFilterCheck"="c:\windows\system32\NeroCheck.exe" [2001-07-09 155648] "mcagent_exe"="c:\program files\McAfee.com\Agent\mcagent.exe" [2007-08-04 582992] "CanonSolutionMenu"="c:\program files\Canon\SolutionMenu\CNSLMAIN.exe" [2007-04-03 644696] "CanonMyPrinter"="c:\program files\Canon\MyPrinter\BJMyPrt.exe" [2007-04-03 1603152] "MBkLogOnHook"="c:\program files\McAfee\MBK\LogOnHook.exe" [2007-01-08 20480] "Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware"="c:\program files\Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware\mbamgui.exe" [2008-12-03 399504] "c:\\Program Files\\Messenger\\msmsgs.exe"= "%windir%\\Network Diagnostic\\xpnetdiag.exe"= "c:\\Program Files\\Logitech\\Desktop Messenger\\8876480\\Program\\LogitechDesktopMessenger.exe"= "c:\\Program Files\\Common Files\\McAfee\\MNA\\McNASvc.exe"= 2006-02-06 c:\windows\Tasks\ISP signup reminder 1.job - c:\windows\system32\OOBE\oobebaln.exe [2008-04-13 16:12] 2006-02-06 c:\windows\Tasks\ISP signup reminder 2.job - c:\windows\system32\OOBE\oobebaln.exe [2008-04-13 16:12] 2008-12-16 c:\windows\Tasks\Malwarebytes' Scheduled Update for Owner.job - c:\program files\Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware\mbam.exe [2008-12-03 19:52] 2008-10-15 c:\windows\Tasks\McDefragTask.job - c:\program files\mcafee\mqc\QcConsol.exe [2007-12-04 12:32] c:\program files\common files\logitech\bluetooth\LBTWlgn.dll c:\program files\common files\logitech\bluetooth\LBTServ.dll c:\program files\McAfee\MPF\MpfSrv.exe c:\program files\McAfee\MSK\msksrver.exe c:\program files\Common Files\New Boundary\PrismXL\PRISMXL.SYS ComboFix-quarantined-files.txt 2008-12-17 02:48:53 ComboFix2.txt 2008-12-16 05:58:18 ComboFix3.txt 2008-12-15 19:56:02 C:\Program Files\Java\jre6\bin\jqs.exe C:\Program Files\Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware\mbamservice.exe C:\Program Files\McAfee\SiteAdvisor\McSACore.exe C:\Program Files\McAfee\VirusScan\McShield.exe C:\Program Files\McAfee\MPF\MPFSrv.exe C:\Program Files\McAfee\MSK\MskSrver.exe C:\Program Files\Common Files\New Boundary\PrismXL\PRISMXL.SYS C:\Program Files\Logitech\SetPoint\SetPoint.exe OK, can you pls update your Java. Go to www.java.com and update it pls. Then go into control panel and remove viewpoint manager. (Start > Control Panel > add / remove programs > remove viewpoint manager) After hearing your computer beep once during startup, but before the Windows icon appears, press F8. Instead of Windows loading as normal, a menu should appear. Select the first option to run Windows in Safe Mode hit enter. My pc is running much faster and my search engines are working properly. Yay! I uninstalled all Java applications and updates I could find. BUT I am not able to download the newest version. It keeps giving me the error message: C:\Program Files\Synaptics\SynTP\SynTPLpr.exe C:\Program Files\Synaptics\SynTP\SynTPEnh.exe C:\Program Files\McAfee.com\Agent\mcagent.exe C:\Program Files\Canon\MyPrinter\BJMyPrt.exe C:\Program Files\Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware\mbamgui.exe C:\WINDOWS\system32\ctfmon.exe C:\Program Files\Adobe\Acrobat 7.0\Reader\reader_sl.exe C:\Program Files\BigFix\BigFix.exe C:\Program Files\Logitech\SetPoint\SetPoint.exe C:\Program Files\Java\jre6\bin\jqs.exe C:\Program Files\McAfee\SiteAdvisor\McSACore.exe C:\Program Files\McAfee\VirusScan\McShield.exe C:\Program Files\McAfee\MPF\MPFSrv.exe C:\Program Files\McAfee\MSK\MskSrver.exe This thread is now closed. If you need it reopened, please send a PM to one of our Mods. Include the link to the thread and detail why you need it reopened. If this is not your thread please start a New Topic.
https://www.daniweb.com/hardware-and-software/information-security/threads/161798/go-google-virus-and-running-extremely-slow
ORLANDO, Fla. (AP) - The University of Central Florida says a hacker has gained access to 63,000 Social Security numbers belonging to former and current students and workers. UCF President John Hitt said Thursday in an online letter that school officials discovered the breach in the university’s network last month. The school has launched an investigation aided by a national digital forensics firm. School officials say the breach didn’t include credit card information, financial information or medical records. Hitt says he has authorized a review of the school’s online systems to determine how it can be improved following the breach. UCF officials say they are notifying potential victims by letter and offering them one year of free credit monitoring and identity protection services.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/feb/4/ucf-hit-by-data-breach-involving-social-security-n/
It’s vital to stay in-the-know when it comes to digital safety and phishing attacks – especially if you have a business to worry about. Companies large and small live in fear of digital attacks because they happen all the time and are potentially devastating. Even companies like Google and Facebook haven’t been immune. In fact, experts say that scammers made away with just over half a billion dollars in the last year. Phishing attacks continuously get more sophisticated, and you should make sure that everyone using the technology in your workplace is well aware of recent scams. Primitive past phishing email attacks had obvious misspellings, format errors, and issues. Now, it’s hard to tell which emails are real and which aren’t! It’s especially dangerous if you have client information to protect. There are a variety of scams out there. From malware that downloads the instant you open an email from an unfamiliar address, to hackers that steal your financial information when you put it in to buy something. Here is how to spot a phishing email in 2020.
https://www.internalcomputerservices.com/how-to-spot-a-phishing-email-in-2020/
If you’ve noticed car charging stations showing up in your area, congratulations! You’re part of a growing network of systems so poorly secured they could one day be used to destabilize entire electrical grids, and which contain enough security issues to be problematic today. That’s what scientists at Sandia National Laboratory in Albuquerque, New Mexico have ... Whoosh confirms data breach after hackers sell 7.2M user records With the support of Europol and Eurojust, the French authorities in cooperation with their Spanish and Latvian counterparts have dismantled a car theft ring which used a fraudulent software to steal vehicles without using the physical key fob. The criminals targeted vehicles with keyless entry and start systems, exploiting the technology to get into the car ... Hackers took down U.S. airport web sites, Department of Homeland Security confirms
https://www.cybersecurity-review.com/transportation/?lcp_page0=3
Most people assume that identity theft is all about money, and this is often the case. But thieves may also have other targets, such as creating fraudulent Medicare claims. It takes multiple forms, so if you’re asking yourself, “How common is identity theft?” the answer is: more common than you’d think. Anyone can become a victim of identity theft, but some individuals are more likely to fall prey to thieves than others. The Internet abounds with opportunities for identity theft, so maintaining a strong level of cybersecurity is crucial if you’re online a lot. Think firewalls, clever and complicated passwords, and — of course — self-restraint. Those who share excessive personal information on social media open themselves up to attack. Be wary of emails and offers from unknown senders. You probably don’t have a billionaire uncle overseas who has been searching for you for years and has finally unearthed your email address. Don’t give him your Social Security number so he can be sure you’re really his kin. Smartphones send up another warning flare. If you haven’t passcoded yours, you’re more vulnerable to identity theft if it’s lost or stolen, particularly if you keep a lot of financial apps on there. You’re also at risk if you make it a habit to use public wireless hot spots to connect, even if your phone’s password would foil the most dedicated code cracker. Then, of course, there’s your wallet. What’s in it? You have a smaller risk of identity theft if you use cash whenever possible. Each time you swipe your credit or debit card, you offer thieves an opportunity to access your account information through a variety of electronic means. This doesn’t mean that writing a check in the grocery store is any safer. Someone can easily peer over your shoulder to read your name, address, account number and the name of your bank on the check. Disclaimer: The information posted to this blog was accurate at the time it was initially published. We do not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information provided. The information contained in the TransUnion blog is provided for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal or financial advice. You should consult your own attorney or financial adviser regarding your particular situation. For complete details of any product mentioned, visit transunion.com. This site is governed by the TransUnion Interactive privacy policy located here.
https://www.transunion.com/blog/identity-protection/how-common-is-identity-theft
“The upgrade to the Digital Threat Protection Suite comes after Easy Solutions added an ‘Early Phishing Detection’ feature to its Detect Safe Browsing solution last autumn.” Easy Solutions has upgraded its Digital Threat Protection Suite with enhanced analytical powers, the company has announced. The solution is primarily aimed at fighting phishing attacks, and now features a ‘Victim Insights’ feature to give administrators detailed data on end users who are falling victim to such attacks. Admins can use the feature to see how many end users visited a phishing site, and how many of those disclosed personal information to the site. In a statement announcing the upgrade, Easy Solutions Product Development VP David Castañeda asserted that “91 percent of cybercrimes and attacks start with a phishing URL,” adding later, “It only takes a few minutes for phishing attacks to make serious inroads.” FaceTec’s patented, industry-leading 3D Face Authentication software anchors digital identity, creating a chain of trust from user onboarding to ongoing authentication on all modern smart devices and webcams. FaceTec’s 3D FaceMaps™ make trusted, remote identity verification finally possible. As the only technology backed by a persistent spoof bounty program and NIST/iBeta Certified Liveness Detection, FaceTec is the global standard for Liveness and 3D Face Matching with millions of users on six continents in financial services, border security, transportation, blockchain, e-voting, social networks, online dating and more. www.facetec.com FACEPHI is a global leader in Facial Recognition technology and in Mobile Biometrics technologies. With a strong concentration in the financial sector, FacePhi’s product is rapidly becoming a service used by banks all over the world. Its implementation doesn’t just save money, it is also a way to attract clients and build loyalty, while increasing the security of transactions for both the customer and the business. To learn more about FacePhi, visit https://www.facephi.com/en/
https://mobileidworld.com/upgraded-anti-phishing-victim-insights-904182/
All software developers are trained in secure coding. Making sure deployed software is safe from various nefarious threats is always a top priority. Or, at least, it should be a top priority. Many IT teams only pay lip service to security. The fact remains that the most common application security vulnerabilities tend to be well-known exploits that developers can easily code around. Microservices security It's hard to believe that basic access control continues to be an issue, but in this new age of containers and microservices, it's not uncommon at all for developers to package and deploy server-side software components without any access control settings at all. Annotation-based security, a fine feature that should make applying access control easier, not harder, is often to blame. With annotations, Java classes and their contained methods need only be decorated with a small piece of text, which subsequently applies security. When this is done correctly, access control problems disappear. But the simplicity of annotation-based access control can have devastating consequences. Developers can get into trouble if they delete an annotation while troubleshooting and then forget to code it back in before deployment. Jeff Williams "Just leave out an annotation, and all of a sudden, you've got a microservice that's not protected," said Jeff Williams, CTO and co-founder of Contrast Security. It's a rookie mistake to make, but it's a problem that arises in the most professional of environments. Another well-known exploit that should never appear on an assessment of application security vulnerabilities is the cross-site request forgery (CSRF) issue. "Basically, the solution to CSRF is to add a token to your forms and links in order to prevent them from being forged," Williams said. "And most people either don't do it or they don't do it right." CSRF attacks will succeed despite the fact that precautions to prevent and thwart such attacks are well-known and well-documented. New scripts, same security vulnerabilities It's almost embarrassing to mention it, but injection techniques -- be it SQL injection, Lightweight Directory Access Protocol injection or command-line injection -- are all regularly flagged when Angular front ends and microservices back ends get scanned for application security vulnerabilities. All it takes to prevent most of these injection problems is to perform simple validations on any text your applications might consume -- whether that text is garnered from the client through an online submission form or information embedded within a JSON string. The need to validate incoming text for escape sequences and executable scripts is not a new revelation to the world of software development, yet it's a task that even experienced developers routinely skip. So, why are all of these easily addressable application security vulnerabilities still regularly appearing in production deployments? Williams said we can blame much of it on the shift toward new JavaScript frameworks based on the model-view-controller methodology, like Angular and Ember. Not that these frameworks have any inherent security flaws, but instead, the simple shift from one programming paradigm to another has made developers forget about the basics. It's as though people just forgot all of the security-related best practices they had previously learned. Jeff WilliamsCTO, Contrast Security "When we moved from pure web apps with HTML interfaces to web services with Angular front ends, we ended up exposing all of these services," Williams said. It’s not a problem unique to the realm of security either. Organizations somehow start to omit compliance rules that were rarely overlooked in the traditional data center when they move to the cloud. "How do you expire passwords? Do you have your firewall turned on? Do you have mandatory access controls on the system machine?" Julian Dunn, director of product marketing at Chef, said. "These best practices are easy to ignore when you’re deploying into that environment." Don't trust vendors with your security But Dunn doesn’t attribute compliance or security omissions to negligence by software engineers but, instead, attributes it to the way various vendors provision their cloud computing environments to their clients. "When a cloud vendor provides you its API gateway and they tell you that it has a web allocation firewall in front, you immediately think, 'Oh, somebody else is accountable for that, right?'" Dunn said. The result? Well-meaning software developers assume the firewall meets all of the compliance requirements or that it will meet all of the organization’s security needs. But this type of blind faith in the cloud provider can create serious shortcomings in terms of security and compliance. Williams also asserted that some of the existing tools intended to detect security holes are failing to deliver and took particular aim at existing static analysis tools. "Static analysis tools take too long to run; they require experts in order to operate them and interpret the results, and they produce a huge number of false positives. They also miss a lot," Williams said. "If it takes a week to get your application scanned and another week to interpret the results, that's just way too long." Cloud computing and the new, modular, container-based systems used for developing and deploying microservices and serverless applications have significantly changed the way applications are developed. But that doesn’t mean security and compliance best practices should be abandoned. In fact, going back to first principles and making sure all of the basics are covered will go a long way to ensure deployed applications meet all of the required compliance standards, while, at the same time, are free of any oblivious application security vulnerabilities. Dig Deeper on Enterprise development security Ballerina language Ballerina language is an open-source, cloud-native programming language designed to ease the burden of integration development associated with enterprise applications. Step-by-step SOAP web services example in Java using Eclipse There was a time when creating a SOAP web service was an arduous task. In this step-by-step SOAP web services example in Java using Eclipse, let's show how times have changed. How JSR-375 simplifies and standardizes Java EE security Java EE security has always been a mixed bag in terms of simplicity and standardization, but the new Java EE Security API, JSR-375, plans to change all of that. Using a VMware firewall as part of a defense-in-depth strategy While it is not the Holy Grail of network security, VMware firewall technologies are critical components of protecting a virtual data center. Expert Paul Henry explains why. Can security support help developers write code? At best, development frameworks support the creation of secure code. They do not, however, prevent the creation of insecure code.
https://www.theserverside.com/feature/Application-security-vulnerabilities-are-often-known-exploits
Services offered by your GP Practice such as travel services. Health services and health support groups in your area. Help from NHS.uk regarding your condition. To make a request to your Practice select the service that you require. You will be prompted for information about your request. When you complete a request this will be sent to your practice. The system acknowledges that your request has been sent and will let you know what happens next. The Practice handles the requests during their normal working day, i.e. if you send a request on Friday pm the Practice won’t normally see it until Monday morning. How do I receive the responses from the Practice? On some services, such as Ask the Practice a question and Ask the Doctor a question once the Practice has processed your request they will send you a response. This response will be sent to the email address that you have given in the form. For security purposes the email will ask that you verify your identification. Once you have completed this the message from the surgery will be shown for you to read. Security of your information This service always uses fully encrypted connections, the same security as used in internet banking. If you look at the right of the address bar, you will see a small padlock icon. This indicates that you are using a secure link and that your data is encrypted. As an additional measure your information is held encrypted until the practice need to view it. It is then sent to the practice still encrypted and only converted to readable text at the practice. How you got to the site and what links you clicked on. We haven’t given Google permission to share this data with anyone else. If you are travelling abroad please make sure you contact us in plenty of time to arrange any vaccinations that may be necessary. To help the Travel Nurses assess your travel needs it is important that they are in receipt of the assessment form before your appointment. After 3 days of submitting your travel form, please contact the surgery to see if you need an appointment.
https://ailsacraigmedicalpractice.co.uk/navigator/travel-risk-assessment/
Exhibitors at ASIS 2010 may now submit their entries for ASIS Accolades, a competition that recognizes the security industry’s innovative new product and service solutions. ASIS International’s 56th Annual Seminar and Exhibits (ASIS 2010), will be held Oct. 12-15 at the Dallas Convention Center. ASIS 2010 exhibitors may submit new security technology, products or services for evaluation by a panel of judges representing end users and experts in physical and information security technologies. ASIS Accolades awards for up to 10 winners will be presented at the Oct. 12 networking luncheon. Accolades award winners and their products/solutions will also be highlighted during the “What’s New on the Floor” session. New this year: an area on the exhibit floor will showcase each new product/service entered in the competition. For more information on the application process and winner benefits, visit www.ASIS2010.org.
https://www.securitymagazine.com/articles/80766-entries-being-accepted-for-asis-accolades-competition-1
For companies in Fort Worth or anywhere in Texas, Progent offers remote technical support for computer systems based on Microsoft, Cisco, macOS and OS , or Linux technology. Progent's Microsoft Certified engineers have delivered online troubleshooting to businesses in all 50 states in the U.S. (Refer to testimonials from Progent's clients.) Progent also can furnish the expertise of Cisco CCIE engineers to handle complex infrastructure issues, plus the assistance of CISSP-qualified cybersecurity consultants to help with advanced security architecture and diagnostic jobs. Progent's remote support experts offer exceptional leverage due to the fact that they possess the real-world experience and are equipped with the advanced technology required to resolve the majority of information system problems quickly. Efficient support lowers immediate expenses since service calls require minimal chargeable minutes. Online help also eliminates the cost of sending a consultant to your location. Your company saves even more with incidental costs by minimizing or avoiding network downtime and related losses due to business disruption, disgruntled clients, idle workers, and de-focused management. Progent's extensive remote technical support expertise is particularly helpful for businesses that are dependent on public clouds for critical network infrastructure or applications such as Microsoft Azure, Amazon AWA, or Office 365 Exchange Online, where on-premises tech support may not be an option. Progent's billing policy for remote support is designed to leverage your network support dollar. Progent bills per minute for phone assistance, so you pay only for the support that you receive. Unlike many remote service organizations, Progent imposes no startup fee or minimum payments. Progent's one-minute granularity and simple policy for pricing do away with scenarios where quick fixes somehow end up as major tabs. Progent's skill at handling technical issues quickly means you saves money. Progent's Online Consulting and Troubleshooting Services Through years of experience, Progent has refined a collection of customized technologies and proven processes which allow the maximum degree of efficiency for remote technical support and troubleshooting for information systems of any size. Progent provides safe Virtual Private Network support for VPN gateways from multiple leading vendors including Microsoft, Cisco, SonicWall and Checkpoint. Secure VPN technology permits the consultants of Progent's Technical Response Center to connect to your network remotely without breaching system security. Progent's proven customer support database application keeps extensive documentation for the support that Progent's clients have received. Progent's staff consultants have the benefit of the history of assistance delivered to every Progent customer by every Progent engineer. This database of problems and repairs is stored as a readily retrievable support database that enables Progent's remote technical engineers to share their knowledge company-wide to ensure that the effectiveness of Progent's support services grows over time. Progent's extensive list of certifications and working relationships with key technology companies such as Cisco and Microsoft make available additional massive technical support knowledge bases and permit priority response from vendors' in-house engineering staff with the result that Progent's online consulting specialists can come up with optimal resolutions in the least time. Progent's Microsoft-certified remote support engineers can provide computer system troubleshooting and consulting help for the complete line of Microsoft server technologies. Progent is a Microsoft Certified Partner and can offer your organization the expertise of support engineers who can assist you with a wide range of technology support including Windows Server 2019 migration, Windows Server 2016 integration for hybrid cloud environments, Windows Server 2012 R2 integration, Windows Server 2008 R2 migration, MS Exchange 2016 Server migration, Exchange Server 2013 consulting, Microsoft Exchange 2010 monitoring and support, SharePoint 2019 design and configuration, SharePoint 2016 migration and hybrid integration consulting services, Microsoft Skype for Business Server planning and deployment consulting, Lync Server 2013 management, and Microsoft Communications Server troubleshooting, Forefront Threat Management Gateway 2010 administration and ISA Server maintenance, Microsoft SQL Server 2017 expertise, SQL Server 2016 migration and programming and Microsoft SQL Server 2014 consulting, Systems Center Operations Manager system monitoring, Project Server planning, Microsoft Access Development and Training, SBS Server consulting, and Windows Essentials cloud integration. Progent in addition can deliver a wide array of cost-effective PC desktop support services to assist your business to deploy, integrate, troubleshoot, and administer workstations and laptops based on Microsoft Windows. Progent's PC desktop support services cover areas such as offering Microsoft Windows 10 upgrade support as well as Microsoft System Center 2012 Configuration Manager (SCCM 2012) planning and installation, System Center 2016 Configuration Manager (SCCM 2016) hybrid cloud integration, and Microsoft Intune integration help to centralize the management of your PCs and web-facing tablets and smartphones. VMware's Site Recovery Manager (SRM) is a component of VMware vCenter that lets you orchestrate, automate and verify a consistent workflow for recovering applications and services rapidly following a breakdown. SRM supports centrally managed and automated disaster recovery, application mobility, plus transparent site relocation, failback and re-protect. Site Recovery Manager also allows non-disruptive testing for site recovery, updates and patches and can generate audit reports to verify full service recovery, validate SLAs and demonstrate DR compliance. Progent can provide the support of a VCDX certified VMware Site Recovery Manager consulting expert to assist you to plan, configure, test and maintain a disaster recovery system based on VMware Site Recovery Manager. Progent's VMware vSphere consultants have extensive experience of VMware vCloud Director (vCD), vRealize Automation (vRA), vRealize Orchestrator and vCloud used for managing private and hybrid cloud solutions that deliver high uptime, data security, and disaster recovery. Progent also offers world-class VMware NSX expertise from a VCDX-NV certified network designer to help your organization to build a completely virtualized Software Defined Data Center that can be provisioned or migrated in minutes and managed with a high degree of automation independent of the physical components used by the basic network infrastructure. Progent's Call Center service options for organizations with environments that incorporate Microsoft Windows, Cisco, Apple macOS and OS X, or UNIX/Linux platforms include comprehensive Help Desk services, shared Help Desk services, and Help Desk consulting. Progent's Standard Help Desk Services offer small businesses an end-to-end solution that manages all facets of online desktop support from service requests through trouble ticket generation, remote desktop control, status tracking, problem solving, and management reports. Progent provides help desk services at a substantial discount from Progent's regular desktop service rates, and Progent offers the additional option of fast on-demand escalation to subject matter experts to handle challenging issues. Progent's Help Desk Call Center consulting services can assist you in creating an effective new Call Center or enhancing your existing one, identifying or customizing Call Center software to handle the unique demands of your company, or adding temporary phone support staff to supplement your internal Help Desk Call Center team to handle high-demand events such as software transitions, mass upgrades, or rolling out brand new business software. Progent's Help Desk Call Center staff of seasoned information technology professionals provides your workers in Fort Worth or anywhere in the state of Texas rapid assistance from an effective network service resource with years of experience delivering telephone-based consulting and remote troubleshooting for IT systems based on Microsoft Windows, Cisco, Apple macOS and OS X, or UNIX/Linux components. Progent's mission is to earn the Help Desk Call Center perception as a key driver of business efficiency, and Progent's goal is to fix rather than just record technical problems. To contact Progent about emergency remote assistance with Microsoft, macOS and OS X, or Linux networks, go to Progent's Emergency Phone-Based Help, telephone 1-800-993-9400, or see Contact Progent. For companies and new ventures in Fort Worth or anywhere in the state of Texas, Progent's online computer support specialists can deliver professional and cost-effective system support whenever your business needs it. More than a decade of offering online technical assistance has led to Microsoft Partner certification for Progent's team of engineers and has allowed Progent to develop high-end troubleshooting skills and to refine online connectivity technology to repair IT problems rapidly while eliminating the cost and lost productivity that comes with on-site service visits. Even if your Fort Worth company deals with a local independent support technician or maintains an in-house IT staff that know how to handle ordinary network issues, Progent�s Microsoft and Cisco certified consultants are available to provide an easy and seamless remote extension of your local resources for situations when your usual IT support personnel either don't have the bandwidth or the knowledge to resolve sudden system crises or particularly complicated integration problems.
https://www.progent.com/Fort-Worth-Small-Business-Computer-Network-Support-Consultants.htm
PCMag reviews products independently, but we may earn affiliate commissions from buying links on this page. Terms of use. A vulnerability similar to the Stagefright bug that affected the Android operating system last year could be used to perform remote code execution on some versions of the iOS and Mac OS X operating systems, security experts said this week. Apple says it has fixed the holes in its latest security updates. The security holes affect image rendering, and can be triggered in any apps that use the Apple Image I/O API when rendering tiled TIFF images, according to Cisco researchers. Although images in the TIFF format are relatively rare, they are used extensively by photographers and graphic designers. Among the mainstream apps that use Image I/O for rendering is Messages, which automatically attempts to display images. That means no action from the recipient is required to trigger the vulnerability. One possible scenario would be to send someone a screenshot taken with Apple's built-in Grab Mac OS X app, which uses the TIFF format. In addition to TIFF, Cisco also discovered vulnerabilities in Apple's processing of BMP images, the OpenEXR and Digital Asset Exchange file formats. "Image files are an excellent vector for attacks since they can be easily distributed over web or email traffic without raising the suspicion of the recipient," Cisco explained in a blog post. "These vulnerabilities are all the more dangerous because Apple Core Graphics API, Scene Kit and Image I/O are used widely by software on the Apple OS X platform." Apple's release notes for the latest updates to OS X and iOS, issued earlier this week at the same time as the iOS 10 beta 3, indicate that it has fixed the holes. If you haven't installed these latest updates on your Macs and iOS devices yet, you may want to consider turning off MMS until you do. © 1996-2019 Ziff Davis, LLC. PCMag Digital Group PC Magazine and PC PCMag.com are among the federally registered trademarks of Ziff Davis, LLC and may not be used by third parties without explicit permission. We strongly encourage you to read our updated PRIVACY POLICY and COOKIE POLICY.
https://www.pcmag.com/news/346378/stagefright-like-vulnerability-hits-apple-devices
KARACHI: Placing an online ad on websites like OLX or Facebook to sell items is a good way to attract buyers, but it may also attract robbers and gangs. A worrying crime trend has emerged in the city; criminals and gangs involved in muggings and street crimes are now scouring such websites in search of their victim. Your ad may be well-placed to attract the highest number of potential buyers but it may also attract the wrong people. Therefore, placing an online ad, especially one that contains your address, may be a dangerous thing and you should think twice before doing so. An estimated 10,000 cell phones are stolen in the city every year and the police claim that criminals are coming up with new and innovative methods to rob citizens. So far, the officials know little about those behind these robberies, and are yet to think of ways to fight such crimes. “Street crimes, particularly cell phone snatching and mugging, are now a routine matter in Karachi. Almost every second citizen of the city has lost his or her cell phone and wallet,” said a senior police officer requesting anonymity. “However, this new trend is even more alarming as it decreases risk and maximises reward for criminals.” By surveying these ads, the criminals are able to cherry-pick their victims. They do not waste their time or put themselves at risk for cheap cell phones or electronic gadgets, instead only valuable phones, laptops, watches and cameras are targeted. Hence, those hoping to sell valuable items need to be especially wary. Victims A district Central resident, 20-year-old Azfar Saeed, is among the victims of this wave of crime. It was the first time that Saeed had placed an online ad and he lost his cell phone as a result. “I was not being offered a good price for my smartphone at the mobile market, so I decided to place an ad online along with its photos,” he told The Express Tribune. “I was delighted when a caller agreed to buy it without even bothering to bargain.” Two young men, neatly dressed, came to have a look at the phone. “One of them took my phone in his hand as if to check it out, and the other just put a pistol, which was hidden under his shirt, on my chest,” said Saeed. The robbers then asked him to turn around and slowly walk away without raising an alarm. He turned around to do so and the robbers quickly fled. The phone number from which he received that call was never switched on again. Like Saeed, Imad Khan also decided to sell his phone by placing an ad online. “The last time I tried to sell my phone at a mobile market, I was mugged on the way back as a couple of robbers followed me back from the mobile market,” said Khan. However, his experience with placing an ad online was not much better; he was robbed of his cell phone on his doorstep. “At first I thought that some of my friends are playing a prank on me, so it’s a good thing that I didn’t resist as they had placed a gun to my head and would have surely shot me had I tried to put up a fight.”
https://www.pakistanpressfoundation.org/new-kind-cybercrime-brings-robbers-doorstep/
1. You probably want a *much* longer key file: gigabytes long. Make 2 copies on USB drives; give one USB drive to your friend.
https://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2015-December/027418.html
In case you are a keen traveller and have ever discovered yourself in Tokyo, then you cannot have failed to note that you simply had been within the centre of electronic heaven. The Company Media might be essentially the most powerful adversary in the ranks of Capital, and they’re within the enviable position of proudly owning the very media that would provide any protection of media politics to most people-and in addition sell their wares and inflating their earnings. Actually hundreds of everyday units that we use continuously make use of electronics technology to be able to function. The academic capacity of tradition redefines public pedagogy — the politics of power, the political nature of illustration and social changes. As an thrilling new platform to convey collectively the perfect research and innovation from a diverse group, npj Flexible Electronics will help the development of this subject by publishing high-quality papers associated to versatile electronic techniques in their entirety, such as plastic electronics and emerging materials, gadget design and fabrication applied sciences, and purposes. WASHINGTON – To ensure the security of airline passengers and the nation’s airports, the Transportation Safety Administration (TSA) is implementing new, stronger screening procedures for carry-on objects that require vacationers to put all electronics larger than a cellphone in bins for X-ray screening in normal lanes. To do this they must flip the general public on themselves and this will be executed by Hypnotizing The Lots Through Digital Mind Control and actually creating and supporting a reality seeker actions resembling Occupy Wall Road, creating racial stress with various Police shootings eventualities and staged rioting.
https://www.jdecareers.com/computer-systems-electronics-and-expertise.html
The internet infrastructure company Cloudflare, which provides a variety of performance and security services to millions of websites, revealed late Thursday that a bug had caused it to randomly leak potentially sensitive customer data across the internet. The flaw was first uncovered by Google vulnerability researcher Tavis Ormandy on February 17, but could have been leaking data since as long ago as September 22. In certain conditions, Cloudflare’s platform inserted random data from any of its six million customers—including big names like Fitbit, Uber, and OKCupid—onto the website of a smaller subset of customers. In practice, it meant that a snippet of information about an Uber ride you took, or even your Uber password, could have ended up hidden away in the code of another site. For the most part, the exposed data wasn’t posted on well-known or high-traffic sites, and even if it had been it wasn’t easily visible. But some of the leaked data included sensitive cookies, login credentials, API keys, and other important authentication tokens, including some of Cloudflare’s own internal cryptography keys. And as Cloudflare’s service spewed random information, that data was being recorded in caches by search engines like Google and Bing and other systems. “Because Cloudflare operates a large, shared infrastructure, an HTTP request to a Cloudflare web site that was vulnerable to this problem could reveal information about an unrelated other Cloudflare site,” Cloudflare CTO John Graham-Cumming explained in a blog post on Thursday. The leak did not expose the transport layer security keys used in HTTPS encryption, but it does seem to have potentially compromised data protected in HTTPS connections. And while Graham-Cumming added that there’s no indication in Cloudflare’s logs or elsewhere that bad actors had taken advantage of the flaw, looking for leaked data that hasn’t yet been scrubbed has become something of an internet-wide scavenger hunt. The good news is that Cloudflare acted quickly to address the bug. It pushed a preliminary fix less than an hour after learning about the issue, and permanently patched the flaw across all its systems around the world in under seven hours. But while the company has worked with Google and other search engines to scrub caches and rein in the exposed data—so that people can’t just run searches to find and collect sensitive information from the leak—the fallout remains.
https://resiliencepost.com/2017/02/26/everything-you-need-to-know-about-cloudbleed-the-latest-internet-security-disaster/
IntroductionSmart devices—call 'em what you will: handhelds, smartphones, PDAs—make business people's lives easier. They help to ensure continuous communication by offering features like calendar applications, instant messaging and e-mail services, cell phone functionality and Web access. Any number of today's smart devices can satisfy the basic needs of the average business user, and plenty of websites can give you consumer-conscious reviews. However, the real challenge for IT executives seeking smartphones for themselves or for their organizations is selecting a device that fits their telecom needs with as few tweaks to the company's IT architectures as possible—and therefore as little time and money expended. There are important differences between selecting phones as a business handheld and choosing a consumer device. Most consumers need only basic phone and messaging functionality; everything else is just frosting on the cake. Not so for business users. CIOs and their staff depend on smartphones to stay connected; in some cases, mobile devices keep their companies up and running. Depending on the organization, specific features beyond phone calls and e-mail are a necessary part of business. Even when CIOs are willing to upgrade their architecture or buy new hardware, it pays to know the implications of launching a new device across the enterprise. Some devices don't support corporate e-mail services without specific mail servers. Some are designed to function with specific servers, so they work better with one than another. If you're researching corporate smartphone deployment, the first thing you should do is assess the organization's needs, and thus create a sort of informal criteria for selecting a phone. Purchasing business phones without a clear idea of how the company will use them is like hosting a dinner party and offering only chopsticks as utensils, even though you're unsure if the main dish will be a porterhouse steak, fried chicken or sushi. For instance, you need to determine if your users frequently compose and reply to messages, or if they employ the device more to monitor inboxes in case of an emergency. Do your users need the functionality to view documents, and if so, which file formats must the phone support? Do users need to create and edit documents? Do they travel overseas? What level of security is necessary? Is it OK for your corporate smartphones to include digital cameras and expandable memory, which can introduce their own risks? Second, assess your current IT architecture to identify the mail servers your organization uses (and the version thereof), as well as corporate mail clients, firewalls and other existing systems that may be affected by a smartphone deployment. These first two steps are on you, but we can help with the rest. In the following pages, we provide an in-depth look at four of the hottest smartphones available today—Research In Motion's BlackBerry Pearl 8100, Nokia's E62, Palm's Treo 750, and T-Mobile's Dash—through the eyes of four IT executives: Paul Roche, Network Services CIO; Stephen Ramsey, principal with Brulant; Hugh Scott, Direct Energy VP of IS; and Stacey Morrison, an aerospace industry deputy CIO. In other words, we bring to you both a technical overview and a real-world exploration of what the features mean in a business environment. We intentionally selected devices with varying levels of business and consumer-oriented features. Doing so can help CIOs understand what a corporate deployment would mean for users and IT departments, and also highlights what it takes to support a phone that users might purchase themselves and request that you link to the company network. < Introduction | On to the reviews: Nokia E62 (Cingular) > Nokia E62 (Cingular) With a large, full qwerty keyboard, thin profile and impressive messaging features, the Nokia E62 has quickly become a smartphone-fan favorite. But is it a suitable business phone for IT executives? Yes—with some caveats. In September 2006, Nokia released the Cingular E62, an evolution of the E61 specifically tailored for the American market. The E62 is practically identical in appearance to its E61 sibling; they're both large, thin slabs of matte silver metal, with the same form factor. Both have a large, full qwerty keyboard, thin profile and impressive messaging features. However, the E62's guts are significantly different. The most notable modifications are the lack of Wi-Fi support and the fact that the phone is not a 3G device—two features that helped propel the E61 to popularity in Europe. Though Nokia caught some criticism for the elimination of Wi-Fi and the lack of 3G, the E62's robust messaging and Web-surfing applications overshadowed the missing features. With e-mail options for a variety of e-mail clients and a unique Nokia S60 browser, the Symbian 9.1a-based device has quickly earned a reputation in the smartphone community as a "Q killer." But does the E62 deserve the title? To get the real deal on the E62 and its value to business users, we asked Stephen Ramsey to give the device a test drive. Ramsey is principal at Cleveland, Ohio-based Brulant, a consultancy that focuses largely on e-commerce initiatives, and former CIO of Rogers Enterprises, the parent company of Midwest retail chain Rogers & Hollands Jewelers. Though he's not currently in charge of smartphone deployment at Brulant, Ramsey did select and issue smartphones to his staffers at Rogers Enterprise and is a smartphone user himself. Ramsey's current phone of choice is the Motorola Moto Q, which he employs as both a business and personal device. Bottom Line The Nokia E62's wide, full qwerty keyboard and bright display, combined with its strong voice quality, robust messaging feature pack and office suite, make it a fully functional device for business users who focus on messaging. On the downside, its large, slab-like form factor makes the Nokia E62 too big to carry around without a holster or bag, and its Symbian operating system can be sluggish and unresponsive. Among the other things we liked was the Nokia E62's document viewing and editing capabilities. Also, its impressive battery life—the longest of all the smartphones we evaluated—gives users more than 12 hours of talk time and multiple days of standby time. If you type lots of e-mails or other messages and prefer a keyboard to a touch screen, you don't mind the device's large package and you are patient enough to deal with the Symbian OS, the Nokia E62 is a great option. But it's not a great option for everyone. Ramsey said he would not deploy the phone across an enterprise because of configuration issues and difficulties in linking it to Microsoft Exchange Server. Ramsey also found the device's operating system to be notably less responsive than his Windows Mobile-based Moto Q. Faced with a choice between the Moto Q and the E62, he'll stick with the Q as both a business and a personal phone. < Introduction | Nokia E62: What We Liked >
http://www.cio.com/article/2439182/mobile/the-business-savvy-smartphone-review--nokia-e62--blackberry-pearl--t-mobile-dash--palm-treo-7.html
MalwareDisasters Team: New variant of ransomware through porn sites. A division of MalwareIntelligence MalwareDisasters is a division of MalwareIntelligence. In the same test information is captured about the behavior of malicious code, and also offering the necessary countermeasures to mitigate the malicious actions in question. Calls on sending an SMS message like the number 3862816 with the text 8353 in order to unlock the opening of this picture, besides eliminating the automatic opening of pornhub.com porn site (146.82.200.125). The malware, which MD5 is db836ddad526869bc750b62fbe36e936 has a low level of detection: 6/40 (15.00%) HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\RunModule > c:\documents and settings\all users\media\plugin.exe Related informationDangerous trojans, keyloggers and Spyware detected in you computer!!!Another very active SMS RansomwareSMS Ransomware for Windows In-the-WildLockScreen. Your computer is infected by Spyware!
http://malwaredisasters.blogspot.com/2010/04/new-variant-of-ransomware-through-porn.html
The brain never rests. It is working at all times managing and operating the complex body system. The vast amount of data received simultaneously from a multitude of sensors is instantly analyzed an acted upon. Such a workload would overload even the most advanced computer system. It was in 17th century that Waichi Sugiyama, who wanted to develop a quick and painless method of insertion, developed a small tube like structure through which needles could be inserted. Heartburn Pregnancy Cure, Health Check and Multi Therapy Computer System and Quantum Headset Relief Methods. Weight loss is normal after pregnancy. The loss of weight and lack of nutrition associated with a chronic illness is referred to as cachexia. Unexplained, unintentional weight loss is often a result of illness and should be evaluated by a healthcare professional. Anxiety and sadness - are associated with lung and colon. Weakens the Qi of the two bodies. Uznemiranost blocking Qi flow to a standstill, which is manifested through the rhythm of breathing as breath holding, shallow, rapid or uneven breathing. Frequent sighs only point to the unconscious body attempts to balance and restore the circulation of qi. Ulcerative colitis occurs most often in people who have attacks of anxiety or unresolved emotions from the past. Feeling of pressure in the chest, spontaneous sweating, excessive crying, asmatični frequent attacks, susceptibility to frequent infections of the respiratory tract, skin problems, are just some examples of pathology damaged qi of the two bodies. Many individuals, particularly in their later years are very susceptible to climatic changes. This condition may be the result of low resistance and independent of rheumatism or arthritis. A cold draft encountered in the frozen food section of a supermarket can bring on a stiff-neck or backache in the middle of a hot summer day. TCM views the human body and its functioning in a holistic way. From this perspective, no single body part or symptom can be understood apart from its relation to the whole. Pimples Treatment At Home, Health Check and Multi Therapy Computer System and Quantum Headset Successful Treatment. That stimuli may be a simple placebo, trigger point therapy, belief in a Faith Healer, a worthless over-the-counter drug. The worlds oldest and most effective placebo is your trusted physician telling you: "there is nothing wrong so don't worry about it"..... The Symptoms of Bell’s Palsy. This condition is caused by damage to nerves that paralyzes half of the face, meaning you’re unable to move your muscles. Other symptoms include tearing of the eyes since they can’t be closed, and possibly drooling from the side of the mouth that can’t be moved. It will also be accompanied by distortions of taste and a tingly feeling around the lips.
http://quantumhealing.cloud/Health-Check-and-Multi-Therapy-Computer-System
We have noticed that you are using an ad blocker software. Although advertisements on the web pages may degrade your experience, our business certainly depends on them and we can only keep providing you high-quality research based articles as long as we can display ads on our pages. To view this article, you can disable your ad blocker and refresh this page or simply login. We only allow registered users to use ad blockers. You can sign up for free by clicking here or you can login if you are already a member. Cybersecurity stocks have had a relatively good 2016, with indexes that collate the stocks like the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index (INDEXNASDAQ:NQCYBR), which is up by more than 7.5% year-to-date, managing to beat market benchmarks like the S&P 500 and Nasdaq, both of which have gained roughly 4.5% this year. In this article we’ll take a look at five cybersecurity stocks that the hedge funds in our database were the most fond of at the end of the second quarter, which are Juniper Networks, Inc. (NYSE:JNPR), FireEye Inc (NASDAQ:FEYE), F5 Networks, Inc. (NASDAQ:FFIV), Qihoo 360 Technology Co Ltd (NYSE:QIHU), and Palo Alto Networks Inc (NYSE:PANW), and evaluate their performance of late. At Insider Monkey, we track around 750 hedge funds and other institutional investors. Through extensive backtests, we have determined that imitating some of the stocks that these investors are collectively bullish on, can help retail investors generate double digits of alpha per year. The key is to focus on the small-cap picks of these funds, which are usually less followed by the broader market and allow for larger price inefficiencies (see the details here). – Hedge Funds’ Holdings as Percent of Float (as of June 30): 4.3% Let’s start with Juniper Networks, Inc. (NYSE:JNPR), which remained one of the favorite cybersecurity stocks among hedge funds despite experiencing a 6.8% reduction in hedge fund ownership during the second quarter, being held in the portfolios of 27 funds in our system. Particularly bullish was Ric Dillon’s Diamond Hill Capital, which boosted the size of its holding by 12% during the quarter to 7.06 million shares valued at almost $159 million on June 30. Shares of Juniper Networks, Inc. (NYSE:JNPR) lost almost 12% over the April-to-June period, but have managed to register gains of 2.1% since that period ended. Earlier this quarter, the company posted second quarter EPS of $0.50 on revenue of $1.22 billion, beating the Street’s consensus marks by $0.03 and $30 million, respectively. However, profit guidance for the third quarter disappointed investors, pushing the stock down. The number of funds in our database with long positions in FireEye Inc (NASDAQ:FEYE) fell by one, to 27 during the second quarter. After tripling its stake over the quarter, Jim Simons’ Renaissance Technologies held one of the largest investments in the stock, totaling 1.26 million shares. Also long the stock as of June 30 was Christopher Zepf and Brian Thonn’s Kingdom Ridge Capital, which held 994,800 shares after doubling its stake during the quarter. FireEye Inc (NASDAQ:FEYE)’s stock plummeted in the first half of the second quarter before staging a rebound toward the end of May. Nonetheless, shares ultimately lost more than 8% of their value over the quarter. The third quarter showed no mercy either, as shares of FireEye continued to fall, losing another 12.2%, largely on the back of its announcement of restructuring initiatives, mixed quarterly results, and trimmed guidance. More recently, analysts at Wunderlich reiterated a ‘Hold’ rating on the stock, citing “expected headwinds the company faces during the impending period of transition and restructuring.”
https://www.insidermonkey.com/blog/five-cybersecurity-stocks-hedge-funds-love-from-juniper-jnpr-to-palo-alto-panw-475151/
Doing business in the modern world requires uninterrupted service for users and customers. As businesses grow, application data grows along with the organization’s dependency on this data for normal operations. As is often the case, it is challenging to backup this large volume of application data without impacting user productivity or affecting your business ability to meet your SLAs. Data protection is no longer just about backing up and restoring data, but also about recovering business applications and restoring critical business services for users. That’s why your IT organization needs to shift from an infrastructure-centric view to a more service-oriented approach for data protection. Snapshot-based protection is the first step in the modernization process. The integration of HP 3PAR Virtual Copy (snapshots) with backup ISV ecosystem partner solutions delivers these benefits: Reliable rollbacks from snapshots: The backup ISVs such as HP Data Protector, Veeam and CommVault are integrated with HP 3PAR StoreServ snapshots to create application- consistent points-in-time. This ensures that highly transactional application workloads such as Microsoft Exchange, SQL Server, SharePoint and others can be rolled back to earlier point-in-time for reliably recovery. Rapid online and granular recoveries: In addition to full volume recoveries, support forindividual item restores—such as email items within a mailbox of files within a virtual machine (VM)—occurs at a much granular level for rapid recovery without reverting the entire volume. Plus, you can create virtual copies on 3PAR StoreServ for, say, every five minutes (if you want that level of granularity) for more recovery points. This circumvents the 24-hour exposure window typical to once-a-day backup strategy. One added benefit is that backup from snapshots moves data traffic from the array to the backup server without impacting production SLAs so you can continue your 24x7 business operations. Want up-to-the-second recovery? Zero-downtime backup (ZDB) with HP Data Protector has you covered HP Data Protector ZDB is a replication-based backup solution using disk technology that takes advantage of the 3PAR StoreServ snapshot capability to create a point-in-time replica of the production volume allowing down-to-the-second application recovery. The entire process is fully automated with a central console to allow backup administrators to manage HP 3PAR StoreServ functionality. Managing includes the ability to initiate, schedule, recover, and move snapshots from primary disk to secondary disk such as HP StoreOnce or HP StoreEver Tape for long-term storage in what we call a staged backup process. Watch this video to learn more about ZDB integration with 3PAR StoreServ. 3PAR StoreServ Virtual Copy integration with Veeam: overcoming the “VM stun effect” With virtualization reaching universal adoption, more and more mission-critical application workloads are now deployed on virtual infrastructure. In order to have isolation of fault domains, IT administrators often tend to leverage hypervisor snapshots to create a point-in-time copy and backup data from those snapshots to an external device. Although this approach has merits, it can also cause some challenges and can lead to a VM freeze/unresponsive situation during the backup process as large numbers of delta writes get merged back to original VM data files that were frozen during backup process leading to SLA compromise. Watch this video from our friends at Veeam to understand how HP 3PAR StoreServ and Veeam have integrated their snapshot backup solution to overcome this serious challenge. CommVault IntelliSnap for HP 3PAR StoreServ Virtual Copies CommVault IntelliSnap Recovery Manager has been integrated with HP 3PAR StoreServ to provide application-consistent backup and rapid full volume or granular recoveries. CommVault Intellisnap provides additional capabilities to index the contents of backup for search and e-Discovery. The indexed snapshots can be backed up to an external store such as HP StoreOnce that is optimized for CommVault backups and replicated to a remote site for disaster recovery purposes. Are all snapshots the same? Snapshot technology has been around for a long time. Unlike other technologies, with HP 3PAR StoreServ you don’t have to pre-allocate space for snapshots. Yes, these snaps are reservation-less. That’s built on 3PAR StoreServ DNA thin-copy technology. Plus you can reclaim storage space upon deletion of snapshots. You can also place snapshots on a different tier than your production volume, lock you snapshots, assign different Quality of Service and more. This is what makes 3PAR Virtual Copy such unique and exciting technology! To sum it up, not all applications and data have same protection needs. While designing your data protection strategy, it’s prudent to align the needs of protection with business goals. Thanks for your comment on my blog. As to your question: Creating a snapshot of applications without any application coordination results in a crash-consistent copy ( copy that would exist if the system lost power). The crash-consistent backups are fast but on the contrary the recovery will be longer as it may involve several manual steps to rollback the application (specifically databases) to an operational state. On the other hand, application-consistent snapshots involves coordination with the application prior to creation of snapshots. For example, the Microsoft VSS (Volume Shadow Copy Services) framework provides APIs for external applications (backup apps) to coordinate the freezing (quiesce) of the application and completes the IO writes to disk along with clearing any buffers prior to initiating snapshots on the array. All of these steps are necessary to ensure the application is brought to a reliable state and there are no unfinished database transactions or incomplete application files when snapshot is created. Once the snapshot is created, VSS framework thaws the application and the IO operations resume. HP 3PAR Recovery Manager and the various ISV backup applications outlined in the blog post use a number of these techniques to ensure application-consistency is maintained while creating snapshots. Let me know if you have any additional questions. Thanks for your comments, that's pretty clear with VSS. So HP 3PAR Recovery Manager communicate with VSS (to quiesce/flush exchange, SQL ...) using standard API to provide the link between the application server and the 3PAR array and especially the snapshot mechanism ? HP 3PAR StoreServ provides Application-specific software suite: http://www8.hp.com/us/en/products/data-storage/3parstoreserv.html for VMWare, Hyper-V, Exchange, SQL and Oracle to enable you to create application-consistent point-in-time copies of data, essentially abstracting a lot of complexities that you don’t have to deal with. Now, HP Data Protector has integration with HP 3PAR Application Software Suite but other ISVs (Veeam, CommVault etc) use the 3PAR StoreServ APIs for snapshot management and have their own software suite for application-integration. The point about these integrations and options are that,as a customer you will have an application consistent-snapshot on 3PAR StoreServ that can be reliably rolled back as needed whether you are using 3PAR Application Software-suite or an ISV ecosystem partner solution. Hope this helps. Please let me know.
http://community.hpe.com/t5/Around-the-Storage-Block/Snapshots-Your-first-line-of-defense-for-data-protection-and/ba-p/6793949
As the world shifts to mobile, hackers are adapting their strategies. According to Kaspersky Labs, the security firm just discovered a successful campaign by unknown hackers to target malware at a group of Android phone users. The target: Tibetan activists. The Conference app is malware. Image credit: Forbes The key to getting the attack off the ground was gaining access to the email of a well-known activist and then using that account to send malware-loaded emails to other activists. Once the attachment was opened on an Android phone, the Trojan would gather contacts and other data and send it to a server in Los Angeles. According to Forbes, the attachment was called “WUC’s Conference.apk,” and was likely meant to make activists think it was a friendly attachment related to the World Uyghur Congress (WUC). This sort of social engineering is effective because it uses the credibility of an organization to give recipients as sense of security. It’s disconcerting to see targeted malware showing up on Android phones, and avoiding these types of attacks can be tricky: if the email comes from a friendly organization, it’s tempting to trust the email and open the attachment. Unless you take a scorched-earth approach to email attachments, consider yourself warned. And keep in mind, Tibetan activists aren't the only ones vulnerable to Android malware.
http://hothardware.com/(X(1)S(a1ntkl2rvopqlxesi5plty45)A(o5B4bsgPzQEkAAAANTg2OTFjY2UtZWQxZS00OTM2LWI2NGQtOTVlZDMzOGFmZmY3Ed4D6nJRJChlB47PSARYSO6iKWo1))/news/android-phones-now-subject-to-targeted-malware-attacks
6. September 2022 /in Allgemein /von Andreas Strahlegger If you’re trying to find free ant-virus software just for Windows, there are many options available. Norton Internet Reliability, for example , gives parental www.saasinfopro.com/ controls, video gaming mode, and protection for up to 10 equipment. It is also very affordable, costing as low as $4. 19 a month for starters PC or perhaps $70 a year for safeguards for twenty devices. You may download a trial version of this program if you’re uncertain if you have to pick it. Kaspersky has a free of charge antivirus system that operates on Microsoft windows 10, Glass windows 11 and iOS. This installs quickly and includes a minimalist design and style. It also has its own options hidden in the settings menu. You can build scheduled verification and find potentially unwanted software on require. Another popular free antivirus security software program is Panda Secureness, which requires no for downloading and comes with an extremely simple user interface. It can actually detect malevolent software concealed inside mysterious files. Additionally, users can control which parts of this software are allowed once they set it up. Free antivirus software offers changing levels of protection and features, therefore you need to choose the one that is suitable for your needs. A variety of them only detect malware, while some have functions, such as anti-phishing protection and email protection. If you usually download email attachments and wish to protect all of your devices with one free antivirus software, you should look for a free antivirus plan that helps multiple programs, so you can set it up on all of them.
https://www.quas.at/no-cost-antivirus-program/
WALTHAM, Mass. – Nov. 28, 2016– Cryptzone, the Software-Defined Perimeter company, today announced that Chief Security Officer, Leo Taddeo, will keynote Infosecurity Magazine’s 2016 Boston Cyber Security Conference on December 6 (9:20AM ET) at the Omni Parker House. Cryptzone will exhibit at the event through December 7. The conference supports business transformation with agile cyber security and offers the more than 100 anticipated attendees practical ways to implement strategies into the enterprise. Taddeo’s keynote will focus on, “Deploying Dynamic User Access Controls across Traditional Networks, Cloud and Virtualized Environments,” which is a critical topic within the current global security landscape. “Dispersed teams conduct business from anywhere and anytime, creating a challenge to provide comprehensive access control at a granular level,” explained Taddeo. “I’m looking forward to sharing insight on how to deploy Software-Defined Perimeter and single packet authorization technologies, so companies can implement a homogeneous centralized approach to secure access control for employees, customers, partners and third-parties to their most critical resources.” Cryptzone reduces the enterprise attack surface by 99% with identity-centric security solutions that protect applications and content from internal and external threats. As Chief Security Officer for Cryptzone, Taddeo analyzes the cyber security market to help shape Cryptzone’s vision. He provides domain insight into the techniques, tactics and procedures used by cyber criminals that enables Cryptzone to develop disruptive solutions that empower customers to defend against advanced threats and breaches.
http://www.hisoftware.com/company/news-events/press-releases/cryptzone-cso-leo-taddeo-to-keynote-infosecurity-magazines-boston-cyber-security-conference
The annual “Cost of a Data Breach” study has been released, and the results aren’t pretty or encouraging. Between 2013 and now, the total cost to a company hit by a data breach is a staggering $4 million, which is a nearly 30% increase over the last three years. Worse, between 2014 and 2015, we saw a 64% increase in reported security incidents. On average, companies can expect to see $158 in damages per compromised record, though in highly regulated industries such as health care, this can be as high as $355 per compromised record. In other words, the costs escalate very quickly, no matter what business you’re in. There’s not really a silver lining to be found in the report, but there is some good news. If your company has a rapid response team in place, then you’ll see a significant reduction in the impact to your bottom line. Companies with such a response team at the ready saw an average $400,000 reduction in the cost of data breaches compared to those that did not have such a team in place. Further, companies that had BCM (Business Continuity Management) processes in place were in a position to discover data breaches an average of 52 days earlier, and contain them more than a month (36 days) faster than companies without such policies. While there’s nothing you can do to absolutely prevent a breach, it’s clear that having preventive measures, state of the art digital security and Business Continuity processes in place are all key pieces of the puzzle that allow you to respond more quickly, more efficiently, and more effectively when a breach occurs. Doing so will save you a significant amount of money. If you don’t have any of the above in place, and are interested in helping prepare your company to better weather the storms caused by a data breach, contact us today, and one of our knowledgeable team members can assess the current state of your security, and your cybercrime preparedness. Are you completely fed up with chronic computer problems and escalating IT costs? Do you worry that your backups and IT security are lacking? Do you have a sneaking suspicion that your current IT guy doesn't have a handle on things? Our free IT optimization plan will reveal gaps and oversights in your computer network and show you how to eliminate all your IT problems and never pay for unnecessary IT expenses again. Complete the form below to gain instant access to more information on how to get a free IT Optimization Plan for your company.
https://www.et-t.com/2016/08/03/data-breach-costs-up-30-percent-is-your-business-secure/
A few weeks ago I was excited when Rapid7, asked me to participate in their 2014 Tech Preview Program for Metasploit Pro version 4.9 I have always enjoyed the interaction I have had with the talented crew over at Rapid7 and I have been a big fan of Metasploit Framework since its inception years ago. Rapid7 has done an excellent job of interacting and allowing its users to participate within their community and they are a humble group of cool, fun people. This was only made more apparent during this year's tech review program for the release of Metasploit Pro 4.9. The team was all about our feedback. Good or bad they wanted to hear it and they were open and honest and listened. Metasploit Pro 4.9 has some great new features that we were all briefed on when the preview got under way and you can read more about them on your own time as you explore the product. For the purpose of this post I'll talk about what I was the most excited about testing: Dynamic Payload Generation to avoid possible detection from anti-virus solutions. As a penetration tester and especially for those who are starting out, bypassing AV is essential to a successful compromise of an organization. You do not want to experience a moment where you find a box you have a pretty good chance of owning and blowing the process by having your payload discovered by the organization's defenses or having your payload detected during phishing or social engineering campaigns. You also don't want a company to get a false sense of security because they detected and stopped your attacks. Years ago I was on a rather large penetration test for a company who trusted their AV a little too much. So much so that they would blow off patching their systems to a degree. So exploitation was pretty easy, however all my payloads got detected and I was reminded by their admin just how awesome their AV was. So what did I do? I researched their version of AV, its detection mechanisms and developed a payload to bypass their defenses. They were not happy about it when I showed them, but at least they knew they were not immune, that they needed to patch their systems and deploy additional countermeasures. Unfortunately the downside was that developing this took time away from the initial testing. To avoid AV in the past I read many articles, tried many methods only to discover that most of the AV vendors had already caught up with these methods. I did have success re-coding and recompiling the source code of tools that typically would be detected such as injector programs and then using them in my payloads that I would drop onto a box (shown below) to get a Meterpreter shell and go unnoticed. It's not pretty, I know, but it was quick and successful most of time. Since most AV solutions use signatures and heuristics to identify malware and have issues with in-memory detection my success rate was pretty good, but in certain situations it became inconvenient. To aid in helping users of Metasploit Pro bypass AV, Dynamic Payload Generation has gotten an overhaul in the recent version 4.9 release. Rapid7 tells us with Dynamic Payloads, you'll have these advantages: • Evade all leading anti-virus vendors: Dynamic Payloads evade the top 10 AV solutions in more than 90% of cases. No AV vendor detects all MSP payload options! In version 4.9 Dynamic Payload Generation has been incorporated into the user interface as shown: Just Select the Dynamic Payload (AV evasion) radio dialog, choose your stager and stage, fill in the local host (LHOST) and local port (LPORT) click Generate and you'll be off and running. For die-hard console guys like myself, dynamic stager generation has been incorporated into exploit modules that have EXE based payloads. For example if you look at the following exploit: exploit/windows/fileformat/ ms12_005 you will see a new DynamicStager option as shown: Notice the description: Use Dynamic C-Stager if applicable (AV evasion). These stagers are available automatically in the pro console in any exploit that uses EXE payloads. I will mention that the old standalone /exploit/pro/windows/dynamic_exe that was available in past msfpro consoles has been removed. The Metasploit team is aware of this and will be looking to bring this back in the next update. It will be replaced with auxiliary/pro/generate_dynamic_stager. I just thought I would mention that for those of you who have used this feature in the past. In my testing during the tech preview all Dynamic Payloads that I generated from Metasploit were not detected when ran against several major ant-virus vendors. I did briefly test the new feature against IPS and was able to slip through the cracks. My sessions never crashed during the testing. My conclusion at this point is that Metasploit Pro is a pretty excellent product that can save you time trying to evade defenses and improve your success rate of conducting successful testing. The team of developers and product managers are a great group of people who desire to hear the feedback of their users. My experience with the team has always been that if you have a fix or a good idea that will improve or enhance Metasploit Framework they want to hear it. I hope you found this blog post informative and stay tuned for more from me in the future. Until then Happy Hackin… Success! Success! Thank you for submission. We will be in touch shortly. Submit your information and we will get in touch with you. I am a consultant, partner, or reseller. I do not want to receive emails regarding Rapid7's products and services.
https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2014/04/14/from-the-trenches-av-evasion-with-dynamic-payload-generation/
EMC is going back to basics -- but for a new generation of users -- on the first day of EMC World on Monday. This year’s annual user conference will be the last for EMC as an independent company, assuming Dell's pending US$67 billion acquisition goes through later this year as planned. Michael Dell will join EMC's Chairman and CEO on stage during the Monday keynote session. But EMC’s core storage business is likely to stay much the same in the short term, because it complements Dell, said Enterprise Strategy Group analyst Mark Peters. “Clearly, Dell is buying a bigger and better storage company,” Peters said. EMC, a diverse federation of businesses, is kicking off the conference with a new backup offering and a storage array priced for mid-sized enterprises. Backup and arrays have been EMC’s bread and butter for years. The modern twists here are cloud and flash. The company is launching Virtustream Storage Cloud, a service designed for seamless backup and data tiering from EMC gear in enterprises. It’s meant as an alternative to public-cloud storage services such as Amazon S3. The advantage of Virtustream Storage Cloud is that EMC users could take advantage of it without buying a cloud gateway from another vendor and signing a contract with yet a third company, the service provider, said Jeremy Burton, EMC’s president of products and marketing. EMC would supply the gear on premises, the backup software, the cloud storage and the service and support. Enterprises could back up older data from their own arrays to the service or just make the cloud a less expensive tier for “cold” data in primary storage. Less-used data on arrays at the customer site would automatically migrate to the cloud. There’s a lineup of EMC products that are ready to work with the Virtustream cloud. They include the EMC Data Domain and EMC Data Protection Suite backup systems and the VMax, XtremIO and newly announced Unity arrays. EMC Isilon NAS (network-attached storage) can archive less-used data based on Isilon Cloud Pools policies. Also on Monday, the company is unveiling EMC Unity, an all-flash array designed primarily for small and medium-sized enterprises and departments. Flash storage can save enterprises space, power and cooling compared with using spinning hard disks, but there’s still a cost premium for flash that makes it more attractive to bigger enterprises than to smaller companies. EMC says it wants to attract smaller customers to flash. An all-flash Unity system with 75TB of capacity will cost about US$18,000, EMC says. (Hybrid configurations will start below $10,000.) The all-flash pricing may well determine the system’s success, analyst Peters said. Most smaller enterprises don’t actually need the added performance of all-flash storage, but they might jump on the shiny new technology for the right price, he said. EMC sees Unity as the eventual replacement for its VNX arrays, and its name is fitting. The VNX line has evolved over the past several years and is now available in all-flash configurations, but at heart it’s an aging platform that combines two even older systems: EMC’s Clariion SAN (storage area network) technology and Celerra NAS controller. Starting fresh with a new design, Unity will be faster than VNX and take up less space. That 75TB all-flash configuration will be two rack units high (1.75 inches, or 44.5mm) versus 7U for VNX, Burton said.
https://www.cio.com.au/article/599086/emc-world-kicks-off-cloud-backup-cheaper-flash-arrays/
Infosec Island is pleased to continue the tradition of offering our community the chance to win high-value products and services from reputable vendors in our quarterly membership drawings. To date, Infosec Island has given away more than $35,000 in products to lucky members, and this quarter we have over $5,000 more in prizes slated for the Q1 2011 drawing. Eligibility: The Drawing Pool: The drawing pool will consist of Infosec Island members who have completed their account profiles, including uploading a profile picture. A total of three prizes will be awarded to three eligible members. Registration: Registration must occur on or before March 31, 2011 for eligibility. Fill out the brief registration HERE, and you will immediately receive an email confirmation. Login to your Island account and use the "Edit Profile" option in the right hand column to complete your profile, then upload a profile picture using the "My Picture" tab. More Details on Q1 2011 Prizes and Eligibility Here. These highly interactive live online trainings (via webinar) are designed to enable you to walk away with important skills for executing the planning phase of ISO 27001 in your organization. They contain 3 workshops where filling in the real ISMS documents are exercised. The courses offer compelling content, downloadable materials and live engagement with an expert consultant with whom you can discuss how to resolve your specific implementation issues. The courses include documentation templates, access to E-learning tutorials and private time with the trainer for consultation on specific issues. You will experience the trainings right from your desk, eliminating travel costs and minimizing lost time away from your office. Trainer: Dejan Kosutic is the author of documentation toolkits and E-learning tutorials at Information Security & Business Continuity Academy. He has long working experience both as tutor and as a consultant – he is Approved Tutor for ISMS Lead Auditor courses at SGS, and delivers various ISO 27001 and BS 25999-2 in-person courses throughout Europe, as well as online courses via webinars. In his consulting career, he works with clients from the financial sector, government, and small and medium sized businesses including IT companies. The views expressed in this post are the opinions of the Infosec Island member that posted this content. Infosec Island is not responsible for the content or messaging of this post. Unauthorized reproduction of this article (in part or in whole) is prohibited without the express written permission of Infosec Island and the Infosec Island member that posted this content--this includes using our RSS feed for any purpose other than personal use. Don’t Let Your Guard Down: Tragedies Pave ... john flynn on 01-25-2021 "bitcoin casino sites https://bitcoincasinosites.blogspot.com/ nj online casinos https://njonlinecasinos.webgarden.com/ real money casin..." Understanding Trust... john flynn on 01-25-2021 "Shifting costs from your capital expense with an operational one, the opportunity to scale along when necessary, as well as the Web-bas..."
http://www.infosecisland.com/blogview/12358-Win-an-ISO-27001-and-BS-25999-Training-Membership.html
If you suspect that you have received any e-mail or voicemail message from someone you suspect may be a visher, DO NOT respond using the phone number provided. Instead, contact that organization at a phone number you know is accurate, appearing: on a debit/credit card or bank/credit card statement; on a bill; or published on a known, legitimate website or in a phone book, and let the organization know the details of the suspected vishing incident. If at any time you are not comfortable with the questions you are being asked over the phone, do not respond and tell the caller you are discontinuing the call to verify it is legitimate from an independent source. No reputable organization will take issue with that. Then call the organization back on a phone number you have looked up yourself. If you think you have provided personal information to a visher, contact the organization involved right away. If you have provided some of your banking or credit card information, contact your bank or financial institution immediately and they will advise you on what you should do.
https://nci.ca/vishing-voice-phishing-scam-announcement/
Visual cryptography is a popular solution for image encryption. Using secret sharing concepts, the encryption procedure encrypts a secret image into the so-called shares which are noise-like secure images which can be transmitted or distributed over an untrusted communication channel. Using the properties of the human visual system to force the recognition of a secret message from overlapping shares, the secret image is decrypted without additional computations and any knowledge of cryptography. Visual cryptographic solutions operate on binary or binarized inputs. Therefore, natural (continuous-tone) images must be first converted into halftone images by using the density of the net dots to simulate the original gray or color levels in the target binary representation. Then, the halftone version of the input image is used instead of the original secret image to produce the shares. The decrypted image is obtained by stacking the shares together. Because binary data can be displayed either as frosted or transparent when printed on transparencies or viewed on the screen, overlapping shares that contain seemingly random information can reveal the secret image without additional computations or any knowledge of cryptographic keys. However, due to the nature of the algorithm, the decrypted image is darker, contains a number of visual impairments, and most of visual cryptography solutions increase the spatial resolution of the secret image. In addition, the requirement for inputs of the binary or dithered nature only limits the applicability of visual cryptography. 2.2 Product Feature developer applications This application discusses some of the concepts on which these systems are built. The Visual cryptography is modulated in to 5 main parts ¢ There is a login process for every participant to view the secret image. ¢ Encoding the image in to shares and send it to the participant. ¢ Decoding the image by stacking the Ëœnâ„¢ shares or fewer than n i.e. Ëœkâ„¢ shares where (k<=n). ¢ Verification is done by verifying the original share of the first participant with the verification share of the second participant. ¢ All GUI components are created using AWT Swings for user friendly. 2.3 User Classes and Characteristics Using this product user can prevent the cheating in VCS from the intruders in sharing the original image from one participant to another. The participant will first login to the window; it shows a message open the secret image. Participant has to select the image and open the file, next it asks for the verification image to open. We have to decode the process by adding the original image shares and verification image shares. To verify whether the shares are genuine are not we have to stack the share1 of original image by verify2 of verification image for participant and vice versa for second participant. if both participants have genuine shares the original image is opened. 2.4 User Documentation In our user manual we are going to keep the information regarding our product, which can be understandable by a new person who is going to use it. If a new person is using it, online help will be provided in that. We are going to explain each and every step clearly about our product so that any user can easily understand it. System Analysis is first stage according to System Development Life Cycle model. This System Analysis is a process that starts with the analyst. Analysis is a detailed study of the various operations performed by a system and their relationships within and outside the system. One aspect of analysis is defining the boundaries of the system and determining whether or not a candidate should consider other related systems. During analysis, data is collected from the available files, decision points, and transactions handled by the present system. Logical system models and tools are used in analysis. Training, experience, and common sense are required for collection of the information needed to do the analysis. A computer network is a communication system for connecting end system, in order to send messages or files. From one to another. So to achieve proper communication the network should be a dedicated one. the interconnection i.e. physical connections should be proper. Whenever a new network is added it should not disturb the existing network. Similarly when a network is deleted communication should be carried on properly The network should be reachable with a high reliability and should provide consistent routing and should be able to provide solution for the routing problem. Requirement Analysis is a software engineering task that bridges the gap between system level software allocation and software design. It provides the system engineer to specify software function and performance, indicate software’s interface with the other system elements and establish constraints that software must meet. The basic aim of this stage is to obtain a clear picture of the needs and requirements of the end-user and also the organization. Analysis involves interaction between the clients and the analysis. Usually analysts research a problem from any questions asked and reading existing documents. The analysts have to uncover the real needs of the user even if they don’t know them clearly. During analysis it is essential that a complete and consistent set of specifications emerge for the system. Here it is essential to resolve the contradictions that could emerge from information got from various parties. This is essential to ensure that the final specifications are consistent. It may be divided into 5 areas of effort. computation. Someone with all the n shares could decrypt the message by overlapping each of the shares over one another. There are mainly two approaches to visual cryptography as described by Naor and Shamir, namely (k; n) Threshold VCS and (n; n) Threshold VCS. visual system, i.e., eyes. The basic model consists of a printed page of the cipher text and a printed transparency. The original message can be revealed by placing the transparency over the cipher text page. The simplicity of the system allows anyone without any knowledge of cryptography or complex decrypting methods to use it very easily. This basic method of visual cryptography is similar to the use of a One-time Pad, i.e., each cipher page is decrypted with a di erent transparency. Another advantage of this method is the ability to encrypt several secret messages into a single cipher text. Several models can be used to implement visual crytography. A few have been discussed in els, each of which are handled separately. Each pixel in the original image appears in n shares/modi ed versions, called transparencies. Each share or transparency is a collection of m black & white sub-pixels. The resulting structure is de ned by an n  m Boolean matrix Si = [sij ];where sij = 1 if the jth subpixel in the ith transparency is black.
http://seminarprojects.com/Thread-visual-cryptography
Cybercrime is one of the most urgent threats to U.S. businesses and government. Having grown in numbers and sophistication, there is a need for skilled workers to help stop these cyber attacks. The Cybersecurity Institute was created to help meet this demand for cybersecurity professionals. CCBC has multiple programs that prepare students for career in cybersecurity, digital forensics and network technology. The Cybersecurity Institute offers: Various formats of instruction to suit needs of students: face-to-face, blended and online. Internship opportunities for students with industry partners. Weekly meeting(s) with government and local industry experts. Partnerships with local high schools to promote CCBC and strengthen community outreach. Preparing students to participate in competitions. Articulation agreements with four-year colleges and universities.
http://www.ccbcmd.edu/Programs-and-Courses/Schools-and-Academic-Departments/School-of-Business-Technology-and-Law/Network-Technology-and-Cybersecurity/Cybersecurity-Institute.aspx
Dialer. VQ is a dialer type malware. Dialers usually try to establish phone connections with high rate numbers, significantly increasing the phone bill of the affected user. Dialer. VQ affects computers that use a modem to connect to the Internet, as the virus modifies the Dial-up network access settings. It changes the telephone number provided by the ISP (Internet Service Provider), which is a local-rate number, to a high-rate number. Dialer. VQ does not spread automatically using its own means. It needs an attacking user's intervention in order to reach the affected computer. The means of transmission used include, among others, floppy disks, CD-ROMs, email messages with attached files, Internet downloads, FTP, IRC channels, peer-to-peer (P2P) file sharing networks, etc.
https://www.pandasecurity.com/homeusers/security-info/about-malware/encyclopedia/overview.aspx?idvirus=54514
December is Identity Theft Protection Awareness Month and we’re taking this month to share some ways you can help keep your identity safe. In 2019, 14.4 million people were victims of identity theft.1 Identity theft can happen in a number of ways: in-person, online, over email or on the phone. However it occurs, identity theft affects a large number of people per year. Let’s learn about how you can protect your identity and sensitive information online and in-person. Tip #1: Don’t Assume Your Identity Will Never Get Stolen No matter how careful you are with your personal information, never assume that you are immune to identity theft. According to a recent report, 47% of Americans experienced financial identity theft in 2020.2 That’s nearly half of all adults, and that only includes the cases of identity theft that were properly reported. There could be other cases that were either never reported or never even discovered. There is so much data in today’s world that it’s impossible to keep yourself completely safe, but by understanding the risk of fraud, you can grasp how important it is to follow these and other cybersecurity tips. Tip #2: Use a VPN When Using Wi-Fi to Increase Data Protection A virtual private network (or VPN) can help keep you safe when you’re browsing the web on Wi-Fi. A VPN creates an encrypted connection between your computer and the VPN server, meaning that all your internet usage is routed through this connection. Most VPN servers actually have multiple layers of encryption to help keep you and your information safe. Signing up for a VPN is easy and you can set one up on both your mobile device and your computer. Check out these comprehensive instructions from The Verge, a popular technology publication. VPNs also mask your IP address (which indicates where you are located and provides information about your computer) and personal information. Tip #3: Don’t Share Your Passwords or Use the Same Password for Multiple Sites Hopefully this tip is common sense, but don’t share your passwords with others, especially people you don’t know. If you do need to share your password, use a password management site like Keeper or LastPass that allows you to share a record with someone without showing them the actual password. Or, change your password right after sharing it with someone. In addition to not sharing your password with others, don’t use the same password for multiple sites, especially if it contains identifying information such as your address, children’s names or pet names, etc. A strong password is long, contains a mix of upper- and lowercase letters, contains numbers and symbols, has no ties to your personal information, and doesn’t contain any dictionary words. In today’s world of posting everything from pictures of your grandkids to what you had for lunch on social media, it’s important to be aware of what personal information you are sharing online. Hackers can easily get information from your Facebook or Instagram profile and use it to hack into your other accounts. Never share your address, phone number, photos of personal IDs (passport, driver’s license, birth certificate, etc.) or full date of birth on social media. We live in a very connected world, and it’s more important than ever to protect your information and your family’s information. Staying safe online and practicing these tips will help prevent you from falling victim to increasing identity theft scams. 98 Harriet Rd. Churchville PA 18966 Investment adviser representative and registered representative of, and securities and investment advisory services offered through Voya Financial Advisors, Inc. (member SIPC) Federal and state insurance and securities rules and regulations prohibit registered representative(s) and/or investment adviser representative(s) from soliciting, offering and selling any insurance or securities products or providing investment advice until they are properly registered and licensed in each state jurisdiction.
https://stephenpeiffer.com/blog/december-is-identity-theft-protection-awareness-month
GregCenter. A is a virus that spreads to other computers by copying its code to other files or programs. GregCenter. A does not spread automatically using its own means. It needs an attacking user's intervention in order to reach the affected computer. The means of transmission used include, among others, floppy disks, CD-ROMs, email messages with attached files, Internet downloads, FTP, IRC channels, peer-to-peer (P2P) file sharing networks, etc. GregCenter. A uses the following infection strategies: Prepending: it enters its code at the beginning of the file it infects. By doing this, it ensures that the virus is run every time the infected file is executed, but without interfering the functioning of the file.
https://www.pandasecurity.com/homeusers/security-info/about-malware/encyclopedia/overview.aspx?idvirus=53623
Positive Technologies Research Team discovered several Session Fixation vulnerabilities in Kayako Support Suite. To generate a session, insecure functions mt_rand() and uniqid() are used. Moreover, the function mt_srand() uses the function microtime() for seed, which allows an attacker to go over all possible variants of seed, set it and predict the value of the following sess_id or the file name when it is uploading. The vulnerability details are not disclosed. Positive Technologies www.ptsecurity.com is among the key players in the IT security market in Russia. The principal activities of the company include the development of integrated tools for information security monitoring (MaxPatrol); providing IT security consulting services and technical support; development of the Securitylab en.securitylab.ru leading Russian information security portal. Among the clients of Positive Technologies, there are more than 40 state enterprises, more than 50 banks and financial organizations, 20 telecommunication companies, more than 40 plant facilities, as well as IT, service and retail companies from Russia, the CIS countries, the Baltic States, China, Ecuador, Germany, Great Britain, Holland, Iran, Israel, Japan, Mexico, the Republic of South Africa, Thailand, Turkey, and the USA. Positive Technologies is a team of highly skilled developers, advisers and experts with years of vast hands-on experience. The company specialists possess professional titles and certificates; they are the members of various international societies and are actively involved in the IT security field development.
https://www.ptsecurity.com/ww-en/analytics/threatscape/pt-2009-43/
Patching is never easy, but doing it imperfectly can come back to bite you. That’s why today we’re unpacking a vulnerability that can resurface when improperly mitigated. Microsoft recently released a patch in October for the obnoxious CVE-2020-16898 within the IPv6 stack that is capable of triggering the BSOD (Blue Screen of Death). This vulnerability, dubbed Bad Neighbor, is a dedicated bug within the IPv6 Neighbor Discovery Protocol. The bug arises when it improperly handles ICMPv6 router advertisement packets. This is a critical security flaw (8.8 severity score) as cybercriminals can use it to carry out other specific attacks such as remote code execution (RCE) that can lead to much worse outcomes than BSOD. As I mentioned earlier, a malicious actor can remotely exploit the vulnerable system by using remote code execution to trigger a chain reaction, linking one vulnerable machine to another and providing the attacker with a network of compromised and unusable systems. If the IPv6 router advertisement packet is maliciously crafted with an RDNSS option, then it can trigger a tcpip.sys file from the Windows operating system and lead to a DoS attack. The vulnerability occurs because of the tcpip.sys driver parses ICMPv6 messages incorrectly. Since the vulnerability appears within the router advertisement packet of the ICMPv6 neighbor discovery protocol, that’s why it got the Bad Neighbor name. The vulnerability largely impacts Windows 10 users, even if Microsoft has recently released an update that patches the vulnerability for Windows 10 users originating from different build versions. Shodan.io, the acclaimed tool used to unveil the location of two computers connected within the same network, puts the number of Windows server machines with IPv6 addresses in the hundreds, if not in the thousands. The reason for this limited attack surface mapping is that firewalls secure many of the servers and others are operated and managed by cloud service providers, thus making them unreachable to Shodan.io scans. How to detect the “Bad Neighbor” when your endpoint protection doesn’t Detecting the CVE-2020-16898 vulnerability is quite simple. You can do it with a simple heuristic (aka solving problems using self-discovery and shortcuts to produce solutions). The heuristic will parse all the incoming ICMPv6 traffic while looking for packets with an ICMPv6 type field of 134 that indicates the router advertisement. All that while an ICMPv6 option field of 25 indicates the RDNSS. The storage is a static buffer of 0x20 bytes that cannot handle the packets, causing buffer overflow that leads to BSOD. Source: Trustwave After you narrow down the viability of the exploit or vulnerability to the two most plausible suspects used to leverage CVE-2020-16898, you can further confirm if the current RDNSS option also has a length field value that is even. The heuristic will then drop a red flag at the end with this entry, as it’s likely part of a Bad Neighbor exploit crafted by a potential attacker who’s using remote assistance. It is also likely that the red flag you see over there has been raised by your detection tool for some other vulnerability. This can happen if your detection tool’s database is getting updated with the CVE-2020-16898. Unfortunately, not many detection tools can identify the vulnerability right now. Top tip: if you run into some red flags when running scans but don’t know whether they’re indicators of the Bad neighbor vulnerability or not, check the IP section. If it’s remotely associated with IPv6 or shows ICMPv6 written on the side, then it is potentially CVE-2020-16898. Up next, we dig into the mitigation steps, from Microsoft’s October patch to a workaround you can use if you can’t apply the patch for now. Do note that the workaround is only intended to be executed if you can’t find the patch or if the patch doesn’t help you mitigate the vulnerability in the first place. Mitigating Bad Neighbor / CVE-2020-16898 so it doesn’t make a comeback The best course of action is to start with patching, as Microsoft has already released the patch for CVE-2020-16899 vulnerability. But if that doesn’t seem viable in your context, you can always start disabling IPv6 either on the network interface controller or at the network perimeter by willingly dropping all ICMPv6 traffic – if it’s not essential nor required at the moment. Additionally, you can also block or drop router advertisements the same way as with the ICMPv6 traffic on the network perimeter. The Windows Firewall and Windows Defender are unable to block the proof of concept when enabled. And so, you run the risk of not being able to confirm if the attack can become successful by tunneling ICMPv6 traffic over IPv4. To fully confirm that the intended patch will work for you to mitigate this problem and that the vulnerability won’t come back stronger, check various nodes of actions attackers can leverage to further exploit the vulnerability in your system even with the patch applied or IPv6 traffic completely blocked. If the malicious actor can use IPv4 to continue with the exploit, then the current patch won’t be able to fix the problem in its entirety and will likely resurface sooner than later. You might need to work with experienced developers or security engineers to find these action pathways. Until then, your best bet is to install Microsoft’s latest October patch. At this point, the vulnerability is still extremely new, and mitigation is still underway, so we can expect to see malicious actors trying to exploit it in creative and even unexpected ways. The current patch will help you counteract the vulnerability that cybercriminals might try to exploit through malicious Windows Updates. The current legitimate patch from Microsoft seems to be working just fine, so, if you haven’t already installed it, then you should do that right now to mitigate it. Because dealing with vulnerabilities sometimes feels like a whack-a-mole game, we recommend getting in the habit of continuously monitoring your systems for vulnerabilities. We constantly add and improve vulnerability scanners on Pentest-Tools.com (now at 20+!). Join over 45,000 security specialists to discuss career challenges, get pentesting guides and tips, and learn from your peers. Follow us on LinkedIn! Expert pentesters share their best tips on our Youtube channel. Subscribe to get practical penetration testing tutorials and demos to build your own PoCs! Pentest-Tools.com recognized as a Leader in G2’s Winter 2023 Grid® Report for Penetration Testing Software. Discover why security and IT pros worldwide use the platform to streamline their penetration and security testing workflow. Pentest-Tools.com is a Corporate Member of OWASP (The Open Web Application Security Project). We share their mission to use, strengthen, and advocate for secure coding standards into every piece of software we develop.
https://pentest-tools.com/blog/windows-bad-neighbor-vulnerability-cve-2020-16898
Spybot.GM is a worm that spreads through peer-to-peer (P2P) file sharing programs, such as KaZaA. Spybot.GM logs keystrokes and stores them in text files. These text files are then sent via IRC. In addition, Spybot.GM accepts remote control commands, such as launching denial of service (DoS) attacks against websites.
https://www.pandasecurity.com/homeusers/security-info/about-malware/encyclopedia/overview.aspx?idvirus=44713
Flu Mask AntiVirus FaceMask Viral Face Cover Protection in AUSTRALIA. HAS BREATH OUT VALVE FOR LESS FOGGING. Comfortable to wear. Far better than a standard surgical paper mask. Seller assumes all responsibility for this listing. Postage and handling. Founded in 2010, Medhealth has had a highly, uniquely experienced team of qualified executives in the fields of Medical Face Mask.
http://healthd.nl/face-mask/facemask-antivirus_939.html
Randex. BZ is a worm that affects Windows 2003/XP/2000/NT computers only. Randex. BZ spreads across shared network resources. It scans IP addresses generated at random and attempts to access them through the port 445. If successful, Randex. BZ attempts to gain access to the shared network resources by using passwords that are typical or easy to guess, in order to make copies of itself. In order to be run, it creates a programmed task in the remote computer.
https://www.pandasecurity.com/homeusers/security-info/about-malware/encyclopedia/overview.aspx?idvirus=42931
The cybercrime gang Netwalker claims to have exfiltrated data from the College of the Nurses of Ontario in a ransomware attack. A screenshot of data allegedly swiped from the college was posted on Netwalker's website, where the college's name has been added to a growing list of the gang's victims. In a sparsely detailed statement issued yesterday, the college acknowledged that it had been impacted by a cybersecurity incident but didn't specify what had occurred. The statement read: "The College of the Nurses of Ontario (CNO) is in the process of resuming normal operations following a cyber security incident. Upon discovery of the incident on September 8, CNO took immediate steps to contain the incident and engaged a leading cyber-security firm that is assisting with remediation and conducting a comprehensive forensic investigation." As a result of the incident, a number of services offered by CNO are temporarily unavailable, including the public register Find a Nurse, the nurse renewal portal Maintain Your Membership, and the portal for applicants. CNO said that investigators are still trying to find out whether any personal information was compromised as a result of the incident. As the governing body for nurses in Ontario, the CNO could have personal information on all the state's 121,488 registered nurses, 59,967 registered practical nurses, and 3,864 nurse practitioners. CNO data that Netwalker claims to have stolen apparently pertains to the college's human resources department. Ontario Nurses Association (ONA) president Vicki McKenna told CBC News of her disappointment that the registered nurses her association represents hadn't been directly informed of the incident. “I’m outraged that I didn’t know as a member of the college that this had happened,” said McKenna. Michael Hurley, the regional vice president for the Canadian Union of Public Employees, said nurses could be placed in physical danger if their address data was stolen. "I’m concerned about who will have access to private information about these nurses, some of whom have restraining orders against their partners, or have partners who have expressed an intent to be violent," said Hurley. In July, the FBI issued a flash alert warning that Netwalker ransomware attacks were on the rise, targeting US and foreign health agencies, education entities, private companies, and governments.
https://www.infosecurity-magazine.com/news/netwalker-goes-after-nurses-data/?&web_view=true
Tel: 852.2866 4362 Email: [email protected] No new notifications at this time. Our telemetry showed that during this three-month span, we detected and blocked a total of 4,439,903 ransomware threats across email, URL, and file layers. This is a 36.6% increase in overall ransomware threats from the previous quarter (the fourth quarter of 2021), and a 4.3% year-on-year rise (from 2021). The number of RaaS and extortion groups grew by 63.2% over the same period the previous year, an increase that inevitably led to more organizations falling prey to ransomware activity. According to the ransomware groups’ leak sites, which recorded attacks on successfully compromised organizations that refused to pay the ransom, ransomware victims rose by 29.2% year-on-year. Figure 1. The numbers of active RaaS and extortion groups and of victim organizations of successful ransomware attacks in 2021 and 2022 The three ransomware families that laid claim to the highest numbers of successful attacks were all widely known for operating under the RaaS model. Based on data from the leak sites of their operators, 35.8% of these attacks were attributed to LockBit, while 19% belonged to Conti and 9.6% to BlackCat. Figure 2. The top three ransomware families used in successful RaaS and extortion 2022 Source: RaaS and extortion groups’ leak sites Based on our ransomware data, which tracked detections of ransomware attempts to compromise organizations, LockBit and Conti were among the top 10 families detected in the entire first quarter of 2022. Meanwhile, BlackCat was among the top 10 ransomware families detected in February and March 2022. Figure 3. The numbers of ransomware file detections of LockBit, Conti, and BlackCat in machines in each month of 2022 Source: Trend Micro™ Smart Protection Network™ Of the three, only Conti was among the top active ransomware families in 2021, based on RaaS and extortion groups’ leak sites. In fact, Conti was first among them in that period, racking up a victim count of 105. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) estimates that the group behind Conti, which Trend Micro tracks as Water Goblin, has amassed more than 1,000 victims and payouts amounting to over US$150 million as of January 2022, making it one of the costliest ransomware families ever documented. RaaS providers like LockBit, detections of which were at their highest in February, have become an even more formidable threat since incorporating double extortion in their playbooks. Under double extortion, ransomware actors not only encrypt their victims’ data and demand payment in exchange for restoration of access, but they also put additional pressure on victims by threatening to release the data if the ransom is not paid. LockBit operators relied on this tactic after they took credit for an attack on France’s Ministry of Justice in January 2022, threatening to publish sensitive ministry data on the dark web upon failure of payment. Relative to Conti and LockBit, BlackCat (aka AlphaVM, AlphaV, or ALPHV) is a newcomer; it was first reported in November 2021 by researchers from MalwareHunterTeam. But what sets it apart from many other RaaS operators is its use of triple extortion, a tactic where ransomware actors threaten to launch distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks on their victims’ infrastructure on top of leaking their data unless the ransom is paid. BlackCat demands millions of US dollars in bitcoin or monero from its victims. It is shaping up to be a major contender in the underground marketplace, thanks to its generous payouts to its RaaS affiliates, who can earn as much as 90% of paid ransoms. BlackCat, which our detections showed was most active in February, has successfully compromised at least 60 organizations around the world as of March. BlackCat is also notable for being the first professional ransomware family to be written in Rust. This is a major selling point for BlackCat, as Rust is considered a more secure programming language that is capable of concurrent processing. As a cross-platform language, Rust also makes it easier for threat actors to tailor malware to different operating systems like Windows and Linux. Ransomware attackers set their sights on small and medium-size businesses Small businesses are often subjected to a huge volume of cyberattacks because malicious actors believe that they have fewer resources to counter cyberthreats, while medium-size ones make compelling targets because they possess comparatively valuable assets. According to its leak site data, Conti staged attacks primarily on medium-size organizations (with 201 to 1,000 employees), accounting for 41.9% of its successful attacks , with the rest of its attacks evenly split between small businesses (with at most 200 employees) and large enterprises (with more than 1,000 employees). In contrast, 65.5% of LockBit’s successful attacks affected small businesses, followed by medium-size companies at 20.5% and large enterprises at 10.5%. Similarly, BlackCat victimized mostly small businesses , making up 57.6% of its successful attacks, with medium-size organizations and large enterprises constituting 25.4% and 17%, respectively. Figure 4. The distribution by organization size of LockBit, Conti, and BlackCat’s successful 2022 Our telemetry showed that government agencies and financial companies consistently ranked in the top three industries in terms of ransomware file detections from January to March 2022, followed by organizations in the manufacturing and fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) industries. Ransomware actors continued to beset government organizations, which also contended with high quantities of ransomware detections in the fourth quarter of 2021. Figure 5. The top three industries in terms of ransomware file detections in machines in each month of 2022 Source: Trend Micro Smart Protection Network Organizations in finance and IT remained common targets of RaaS and extortion groups. In a repeat of last year, ransomware groups’ leak sites showed that these two industries sustained the most attacks . Ransomware groups have typically been drawn to financial companies not only for their valuable data, but also because their attack surface continues to expand as a result of increased connectivity and a more distributed workforce. Figure 6. The top 10 industries affected by successful RaaS and extortion 2022 Our investigation into RaaS and extortion groups’ leak sites showed that the US still topped the list of countries that suffered the most RaaS and extortion attacks, but many European countries were also affected. Figure 7. The top 10 countries affected by successful RaaS and extortion 2022 Source: RaaS and extortion groups’ leak sites, and Trend Micro’s OSINT research The bulk — 40.5% — of LockBit’s victims were organizations located in Europe, followed by those in North America at 34.1% and those in Asia-Pacific at 10.9%. In particular, the US, Italy, and France experienced the most LockBit attacks. Even though most of LockBit’s victims were based in Europe, the FBI noted in February that LockBit’s latest known version, LockBit 2.0, was designed to identify and exclude Eastern European organizations from its attacks. LockBit’s previous version also had an automated vetting process that screened out systems in Russia and countries belonging to the Commonwealth of Independent States, possibly as a means of avoiding prosecution in these countries. Figure 8. The top regions affected by LockBit’s successful 2022 In February, Conti, which has many members located in Russia, weighed in on the Russia-Ukraine conflict and expressed its intent to retaliate against anyone who would stage cyberattacks on Russia. This might explain, in part, the regional distribution of its activity : Organizations in North America were the most affected by its successful attacks, making up 49.6% of its victims, whereas those in Europe accounted for 41.9% and those in the Asia-Pacific region made up 6%. Most of Conti’s victims were in the US, Germany, and the UK. Figure 9. The top regions affected by Conti’s successful 2022 Source: Conti’s leak site and Trend Micro’s OSINT research Like Conti, BlackCat focused its activity on victims located in North America, where 50.8% of its successful attacks took place. Its victims in Europe and Asia-Pacific accounted for 25.4% and 18.6%, respectively. More specifically, it homed in on targets in the US and Italy. In 2022, BlackCat was responsible for headline-making attacks on prominent European companies, including a German fuel distribution firm and an Italian high-end fashion brand. Figure 10. The top regions affected by BlackCat’s successful 2022 Ransomware remains a major threat to businesses of all sizes, which must contend with malicious actors wielding an arsenal of increasingly sophisticated tools and techniques. Organizations can mitigate the risk of ransomware attacks that could compromise their data by following these recommended security practices: Enable multifactor authentication. Organizations should have policies in place that require employees who access or store company data on their devices to enable multifactor authentication, so that any sensitive information in these devices cannot be easily accessed. Back up data. As much as possible, organizations should follow the “3-2-1 rule” to protect their important files: Create at least three backup copies in two different file formats, with one of those copies stored off-site. Keep systems up to date. Organizations should update all of their applications, operating systems, and other software as soon as patches are released by vendors and developers. Doing so can help prevent ransomware actors from exploiting vulnerabilities to gain access to organizations’ systems. Verify emails before opening them. Organizations should train their employees to avoid downloading attachments or clicking on embedded links in emails from senders they do not recognize, as malicious actors bank on these as means to install ransomware. Follow established security frameworks. Organizations can develop cybersecurity strategies based on the security frameworks created by the Center of Internet Security (CIS) and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The security measures and best practices laid out in these frameworks can serve as a guide for organizations’ security teams as they design their own threat mitigation plans. Organizations can augment their cybersecurity infrastructure with multilayered detection and response solutions that can anticipate and respond to ransomware movements before operators can carry out an attack. One such solution is Trend Micro Vision One™, which is equipped with extended detection and response (XDR) capabilities that gather and automatically correlate data across multiple security layers — including email, endpoints, servers, cloud workloads, and networks — to avert ransomware attack attempts. Organizations can also benefit from solutions with network detection and response (NDR) capabilities, which can give them greater visibility over their network traffic. Among these solutions is Trend Micro Network One™, which provides security teams with the critical network telemetry they need to form a clearer picture of their environment, accelerate their response, and prevent future attacks. The supplementary data sheet for this report, including data from RaaS and extortion groups’ leak sites, Trend Micro’s OSINT research, and the Trend Micro Smart Protection Network, can be downloaded here.
https://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/hk-en/security/news/ransomware-by-the-numbers/lockbit-conti-and-blackcat-lead-pack-amid-rise-in-active-raas-and-extortion-groups-ransomware-in-q1-2022
Hornetsecurity's survey reveals that organizations activated more M365 security features as they were increasingly targeted by cyber attacks in the last year. A global IT security and compliance survey of 800+ IT professionals found that the rate of IT security incidents increases the more Microsoft 365 security features are used. Organizations using Microsoft 365 and that use 1 or 2 of its stock security features reported attacks 24.4% and 28.2% of the time respectively, while those that use 6 or 7 features reported attacks 55.6% and 40.8% of the time respectively. Overall, it was found that 3 in 10 organizations (29.2%) using Microsoft 365 reported a known security incident in the last 12 months. Overall, the survey results indicate that while the use of additional security features is essential, it is more practical to use tried and tested, user-friendly solutions - preferably executed by dedicated security professionals. What do IT security professionals say? Experts at Hornetsecurity, a leading security and backup solution provider for Microsoft 365, say that this could be due to a number of factors. They point to the likelihood that organizations with a high number of implemented security features have done so as a result of sustained cyber attacks over a period of time, in an attempt to mitigate security threats. They also suggest that the more security features that IT teams attempt to implement, the more complex the security system becomes. Features may be misconfigured, leaving vulnerabilities. This is corroborated by the fact that 62.6% of respondents indicated that the main roadblock to implementing security features within their organization is ‘not enough time or resources’. Another theory is that making use of more features may contribute to a false sense of security within the organization. This could lead it to stop paying close attention to potential security threats, believing that all these features will keep them safe without having to make additional active effort. “It’s a game of cat and mouse. As you grow, you add security features, but you also become more susceptible to attack because you are a more lucrative target. Yet, you have to stay ahead of the criminals trying to harm your organization. The results of our survey made clear that relying on stock security features for digital safety is insufficient,” said Daniel Hofmann, CEO at Hornetsecurity. “Organizations must proactively find ways of identifying unseen vulnerabilities and should take a diligent, holistic approach to cybersecurity, rather than relying on what is available out of the box and only reacting once it is too late.” What are the roadblocks faced by IT Pros to implement security features in their organizations? Surprisingly, a quarter of respondents (25.7%) that employ over 50 people and have compliance requirements neither employ a dedicated compliance officer nor a dedicated IT security officer. Several factors contribute to a lack of attention to IT security and compliance in medium to large organizations. Nearly 2 in 3 IT professionals (62.6%) surveyed indicate that ‘not enough time or resources’ is the main roadblock to implementing security features within their organization. Following this, respondents cite a ‘lack of budget’ (44.6%), ‘skilling issues and/or a lack of knowledge’ (36.2%) and a ‘lack of interest from management’ (23.1%). All of the above results indicate a general lack of urgency surrounding security within organizations. Only 2% of respondents indicated that they have no roadblocks with regards to security, and over half of respondents (55.5%) said that their organization does not have a change tracking and review process in place - a vital tool for the identification of security threats. What are the most commonly used security features within organizations? Of the 11 security features listed in the survey, ‘spam filtration’ was the most popular, with 84.4% of respondents reporting its use within their organization. ‘Multi-factor authentication’ (82.7% of respondents) follows closely behind. ‘Web traffic filtration’, ‘permissions management’, and ‘IT security awareness training for users’ are used by 68.8%, 66.4%, and 61.2% respectively. The least common security measure was ‘SIEM Solution’, with only 14.1% of respondents implementing such a measure. However, ‘SIEM Solutions’ corresponded with the highest rate of incidents at 42.1%, which corroborates the idea that more advanced security is needed as organizations become a bigger target. About Hornetsecurity Group Hornetsecurity is the leading security and backup solution provider for Microsoft 365. Its flagship product is the most extensive cloud security solution for Microsoft 365 on the market, providing robust, comprehensive, award-winning protection: Spam and virus filtering, protection against phishing and ransomware, legally compliant archiving and encryption, advanced threat protection, email continuity, signatures and disclaimers. It’s an all-in-one security package that even includes backup and recovery for all data in Microsoft 365 and users’ endpoints. Hornetsecurity Inc. is based in Pittsburgh, PA with other North America offices in Washington D.C. and Montreal, Canada. Globally, Hornetsecurity operates in more than 30 countries through its international distribution network. Its premium services are used by approximately 50,000 customers including Swisscom, Telefónica, KONICA MINOLTA, LVM Versicherung, and CLAAS.
https://www.prdistribution.com/news/using-more-complex-it-security-strategies-does-not-necessarily-increase-security-survey-finds/9193226
Mr. Kaspersky encountered his first digital virus back in 1989 and has since established the world-renowned Kaspersky Antivirus that has protected millions of PC users from online malware. Kaspersky is on the forefront of cyber-fighting and has proven 100% effective against all kinds of malware by various third-party tests. Kaspersky Antivirus is a straightforward package that focuses on the core security fundamentals which is to detect known and brand-new malware and to keep users away from malicious links online. However, there have been a few questions on Kaspersky’s data collection practices in 2015. It is claimed that Kaspersky had replaced staff members with Russian government employees to steal US intelligence data. In fact, the US government departments have even banned the use of Kaspersky software on all staff computers. While this scandal has hurt Kaspersky’s reputation badly, the company denies all such allegations and has taken drastic steps to improve its transparency such as moving a large part of their network out of Russia. In any case, Kaspersky is still one of the strongest malware and virus protection available on the market. The software not only offers strong security, but they do also include some nice features that are really easy to use. Today’s in-depth review will focus on how well Kaspersky protects users against malware and the types of features they provide. Kaspersky Antivirus – basic antivirus product for Windows that offers real-time and on-demand protection against viruses, spyware, and ransomware. Kaspersky Internet Security – supports Mac and mobile against phishing scams and credit card theft cybercrimes. Kaspersky Total Security – top of the range plan that includes bonus features such as password manager and parental control. Malware Protection Kaspersky’s real-time protection is proven to be one of the best. Their scan runs constantly to check the system for anything that might hurt your computer. Once it detects any malware, the antivirus software immediately blocks and quarantines the malware from executing. With the increase in cyber ransom cases, Kaspersky’s powerful anti-ransomware protection is well-engineered to protect users from such dangerous threats online. However, one thing to note is that users might run into some issues when running both the real-time and ransomware protection at the same time. It is best to temporarily pause the real-time scan while you run the ransomware protection. Usually, the “Quick Scan” function in most antivirus software is not able to catch all the malware in the system as they’re designed to target certain areas only. The Kaspersky’s Quick Scan, on the other hand, was able to detect 100% of ransomware files with 0/2 false positives. This result is honestly on par with the best antivirus companies in the industry such as Norton, MacAfee, and Bitdefender. While most antivirus scans will significantly impact a computer’s system to the point of being absolutely unusable, all of Kaspersky’s scans did not slow down any of the computer processes at all. Everything could still run at normal speeds with no issue at all. Kaspersky’s excellent results prove that even quality services don’t necessarily need to come with a high price tag. What’s great about it is that Kaspersky includes its powerful ransomware protection across all their plans unlike certain antivirus companies like Panda, that only offer this protection to premium payers. Cloud Protection Kaspersky offers users Cloud Protection in aid with its battle against malware. The Cloud Protection is claimed to provide increased protection against harmful applications and websites. The software actually sends your computer data to Kaspersky’s labs for research and to improve their virus detection system. However, to turn on Cloud Protection, users will need to be aware of certain privacy issues. For example, users must accept the Kaspersky Security Network agreement that explains what data will be collected by Kaspersky including: The agreement also then goes on further to explain how you’re able to withdraw from such features although the explanation is not very clear. In any case, Kaspersky should try to make it easier for users to disable the Cloud Protection. Currently, there is no option available for users to opt-out of the feature in the main software interface screen. Users are required to go to the Settings menu and opt-out under the Additional protection and management tools tab. Once you’re on the screen, you’ll be able to see a button to decline Kaspersky’s Network Security agreement. However, Kaspersky warns users against turning off the Cloud Protection as the company claims the feature is required to support the application’s basic functionality. But this information is actually very misleading as the software works perfectly without the Cloud Protection feature. In any case, the Cloud Protection does help the company to improve its product which will ultimately benefit all users. However, users who are concerned about their privacy may prefer to turn the Cloud Protection off. Password Manager Kaspersky’s Password Manager does not just help to store your login credentials, it can even help users generate strong passwords and automatically help users log into their online accounts. Kaspersky Anti-Virus and Kaspersky Internet Security include a free version of the Password Manager which anyone can download freely from their website. However, this version lets users store up to 15 passwords only, making it quite practically useless as most users definitely have more than 15 passwords. Kaspersky Total Security, on the other hand, includes Kaspersky Password Manager Premium that lets users store an unlimited number of passwords. Once you’ve set up your password manager, you’ll need to first establish a master password. Only then you can access your password vault where all your login details are securely encrypted in storage. Other than passwords, you can also use the password vault to store important documents and payment information. Kaspersky’s Password Manager comes with a dedicated browse extension for Chrome, Firefox, Edge, and Internet Explorer. The Firefox extension placed a green key icon next to the toolbar which would also appear on the login fields on the website pages. Users will then only need to click on the key icon and the Password Manager will automatically log them in. When users key in new login details for the first time in a website, Kaspersky Password Manager will automatically detect it and store them in your password vault. The Kaspersky Password Manager even has a function to let users check the strength of their passwords. Comparing with other password manager software available, Kaspersky Password Manager seems to function surprisingly well. It does not only look great, but it runs smoothly as well. The friendly user interface provides users with quick access to all the features via the sidebar. The layout is similar to another great password manager – 1Password. However, one thing to note is that Kaspersky Password Manager does not offer as many advanced features as you would see on other password managers online. Some features include an automatic Password Changer, Dark Web Monitoring, Emergency Access, and secure password sharing, all of which are not available in Kaspersky. While the Password Manager is a good addition, it is not worth the upgrade as you can find better and cheaper password managers on the market. Safe Money With the current technological advancement, there are more and more people who have started falling prey to financial cybercrime such as phishing, keylogging, and banking Trojan attempts. This is where Kaspersky’s Safe Money steps in to protect users from such cyber criminals. Safe Money feature automatically detects when users are about to make an online payment or banking and checks to see if the links are secure. Kaspersky software has a Protect Browser feature that opens up a new browser window with a green glow around it. This browser has the extension and syncing functionality switched off for improved security. The Protected Browser is able to run on any browser you may be using. Other competitors, on the other hand, uses a specialized browser, such as AVG’s Secure Browser. So, Safe Money’s convenient access earns extra points for this. The Safe Money feature lets users key in payment information with Kaspersky’s On-Screen Keyboard to prevent keyloggers from recording keystrokes. This function is an easy method to help users avoid financial cybercrime. However, this feature is not available in the Kaspersky Antivirus, but it is a welcomed addition to the other two packages. Secure Connection VPN A virtual private network (VPN) works to provide users with a private internet connection through a secure network. For users who frequently access public WiFi networks, a VPN will help to keep your data safe from potential hackers. Another great thing about VPN is that it allows users to connect to servers from different parts of the world, potentially opening up access to geographically restricted content such as Netflix and BBC iPlayer. The free version of the Kaspersky Secure Connection VPN is available in all three products of the antivirus range. However, even the most expensive Kaspersky antivirus plan does not provide automatic access to the premium version of Kaspersky Secure Connection. The free version of Secure Connection only allows users 200 MB of data usage per day. This limit can be increased to 300 MB if you crease a free “My Kaspersky” account. This is also yet another classic example of how the antivirus company attempts to obtain user personal information. Another big issue I have with the free version is that it does not allow users to select a virtual location. The software will automatically choose one for you. This is not great if users want to use it to unblock media content from specific locations in the world. It is rather disappointing that the antivirus company does not include its premium Secure VPN with any of its plans. Other competitors are much more generous in this respect. For example, Panda limits VPN data on most of its plans except the Panda Dome Premium which provides users with unlimited data usage. Aside from Kaspersky’s VPN data limitation, the Secure Connection functions perfectly. It is able to recognize an unsecured public WiFi network. Powered by one of the fastest VPN providers on the market – Anchorfree Hotspot Shield, it comes as no surprise that Kaspersky Secure Connection VPN offers amazing speeds. If you currently do not own a VPN, the Kaspersky Secure Connection works as an ideal choice. However, it’s not worth paying extra for the upgrade. There are plenty of cheaper and better VPN alternatives on the market that users can opt for. Privacy Cleaner All operating systems and web browsers on your computer actually work to continuously track user activity records. While there are perfectly good reasons for such actions, it also means that it leaves users susceptible to attacks by hackers. The Kaspersky Privacy Cleaner lets users delete any activity traces from their computer and fortunately, this feature is available on all their pricing plans. The Privacy Cleaner clears all browser history, temporary files folder, and prefetch cache on your computer that stores copies of previously viewed web pages for quicker access. Other than that, the feature also helps to clear Microsoft Paint history. This function is particularly important if you tend to share your computer with others, but otherwise, it’s not something necessary. Another cool feature that Privacy Cleaner has is that it gives users the option to roll back any previous changes that users may have accidentally made. This way users won’t need to worry about accidentally deleting or clearing off data that you may need. Overall, the Privacy Cleaner offers users a great level of detail. While there is other antivirus software that includes similar features, they’re usually more focused on clearing browser data exclusively. This way is how Kaspersky goes one step ahead of their antivirus competitors. Ease of Use Kaspersky claims that their latest edition runs 15% faster than the older version with double the installation speed. This claim appears to be true with its very lightweight application. The scans run on the background without noticeably slowing down any computer processes. The software installation only takes a few clicks, but you’ll first need to agree to their License Agreement and confirm that you’ve read their Privacy Policy. Unfortunately, you’re not allowed to decline these agreements if you plan to install Kaspersky. However, there are some additional agreements that you can choose to opt-out for. For example, the Cloud Protection feature and marketing emails can be declined. Users need to be aware of how hungry Kaspersky seems to be to obtain personal data and you should stay reminded that you should not simply be accepting of all their agreements. Once the installation is done, you will be greeted with Kaspersky’s pleasing and easy-to-use interface. The interface only shows users the features that are available to them, which is great news as users will not need to suffer through blacked-out features or upgrade prompts. Overall, Kaspersky’s application is pretty well-designed and simple to navigate. This is one of the top antivirus software that is popular for its great interface and performance. This is a pretty extensive range of support options. However, the FAQs are very poorly organized, which makes it very difficult to find the answers you’re looking for. Their email support seems to also be a bit slow with feedbacks taking longer than a week. As for their live chat, it is handled by a friendly and polite agent, but they offered to email a solution instead of providing step-by-step real-time support. While Kaspersky has spent a lot of time to provide users with a wide range of customer support. However, their FAQs section is a mess and the email support is definitely less than ideal with a very slow response rate. The premium features are available on all annual subscription of Kaspersky product with different price points for 1, 3, or 5 devices. For more than 5 devices, you’ll need to contact Kaspersky directly to get more info. Kaspersky does not come with any free product. The previously Kaspersky Anti-Virus Free plan has been recently repackaged as the Kaspersky Security Cloud Free. While it does not offer the most comprehensive features available, it is free, so there’s nothing much to complain about. These extra features work to protect users against online privacy threats. It is effective against phishing, spyware, and other intrusive tracking malware that most internet users are generally vulnerable to. Kaspersky’s Anti-Spam feature sends incoming mail to Kaspersky’s servers to test and figure out whether it is a spam email. This function is turned off by default for EU users due to privacy laws that the company has to abide to. The Anti-Spam feature significantly slows things down in Microsoft Outlook. However, these types of features are not necessary anymore as most email providers come with pretty decent tools to automatically filter out spam emails from your inbox. The Kaspersky Internet Security is only a small price increase from the basic plan, but it does include some very important features. This is a particularly good option for users who frequently shop online or carry out bank transfers. While these features sound amazing, they are really worth nothing and it is unfortunate that Kaspersky feels that these extras should be in the highest-priced plan. To take an example, the Backup & Restore is just a standard 2 GB Dropbox account with a Kaspersky’s interface. In fact, Dropbox gives free 2 GB storage to every user, and it is a little bit insulting for Kaspersky to put this in their most expensive plan. In comparison, Norton 360 Premium offers its users with a massive 75 GB of storage. The Data Encryption also works no differently from the typical “Encrypted File Service” that Windows 10 has. So, the only remaining features are the Password Manager and Safe Kids that are pretty good, but you can also get either of them as cheaper standalone products anyway. Overall, the best value one is the Kaspersky Internet Security. While the Total Security offers extras, the add-ons are not really worth the upgrade.
https://www.suspekt.org/kaspersky-antivirus-review/
The most common scenario we see using the Security Group targeting item is with the Drive Map preference item. IT Professionals have been creating network drive mappings based on security groups since Moby Dick was a sardine– it’s what we do. The act is intuitive because we typically apply permissions to the group and add users to the group. The problem with this is that not all applications determine group membership the same way. Also, the addition of Universal Groups and the numerous permutations of group nesting make this a complicated task. And let’s not forget that some groups are implicitly added when you log on, like Domain Users, because it’s the designated primary group. Programmatically determining group membership is simple — until it’s implemented, and its implementation’s performance is typically indirectly proportional to its accuracy. It either takes a long time to get an accurate list, or a short time to get a somewhat accurate list. We recently published a new article around behavior changes with Group Policy Preferences Computer Security Group Targeting. Read more here. – Mike “This is U.S. History; I see the globe right there” Stephens It true, many Active Directory environments have little structure– probably inherited down from NT4 or Netware. It's sad too, because that is really why we have a directory, to organize users. It's a mindset that is difficult to break, but its actually easier to manage than trying to remember all the group memberships. In this instance, it certainly helps applying GPP rather than using group membership, especially when used with computers. Thanks for the feature request. We'll forward it up the food chain. Unfortunately you'd be surprised the applications we find that require the bind user be at an OU higher than the OU's you want to search and you cannot specify an alternate base OU (oh the humanity!). I seem to recall at one point we experienced failures with GPP targeting when using nested groups, but in speaking with colleagues here we do not recall if it was a computer group or not. As far as the organization of user objects go, the thinking behind this design was that when a user moves from location to location, we already have to change group memberships. Absent a compelling reason to organize them into OUs, we can query other properties such as office and group membership. Our AD was created in May 2008. We have on occasion organized computers into OUs for GP reasons. I am the colleague that gallwapa spoke of in his most recent post. In my testing, nested groups do not work for security group computer targetting. I have a global group that's a member of a domain local group. The computer is a member of the global group. For the test I am creating a shortcut on the all users desktop. If I target members of the global group, the shortcut is created. If I target members of the domain local group, the shortcut is not created. I have done the same test with security group user targetting. The shortcut is delivered when either group is targetted. If this is working as expected, then chalk it up as one more reason to use containers for computer targetting. We are a university and have staff and students and classroom and non-classroom PC's. Students on classroom PC's are not allowed to lock the PC. Students on non-classroom PC's and staff on all type PC's are allowed to lock. To make it worse their are some non-classroom PC's where nobody is allowed to lock the PC. Students and staff are in one User OU, al our PC's are in one Computer OU. This is because users and computers tend to switch roles and have double roles, so targeting groupmembership is far better then the one OU an account can be in. I made two registry GPP's: one to delete the DisableLockWorkstation value and one to replace the DisableLockWorkstation value. You can imagine the complex AND, OR, TRUE, FALSE restrictions to user and computer groups I needed to build. Applying those two registry GPP's alone to the user profile took 50! seconds to complete. Why doesn't Windows 7 cache the (computer) group memberships temporary in registry. You say it's just the way it works, but it shouldn't be that hard or am I missing something? You're right– not targeting by OU will not meet all scenarios; however, it is a great alternative that is often overlooked. Also, targeting by OU typically requires more depth in the Active Directory hierarchy than a single OU. Many scenarios that include multiple conditional targeting items can benefit from filtering by OU, especially computers because of the speed gained in processing. With regard to caching groups, the actual implementation of caching anything is not that hard. However, several other factors come into play. The biggest factor to consider is when do you update the cache. Cache data is only useful before it becomes stale. To refresh cache, you have to find all the lists of groups again, which increases time. So, you end up with a solution where one application of policy may be slow and the next fast. Now your application times become unpredictable. So, caching information doesn’t always speed things up. It comes with a cost that you'll incur at some point. Also, targeting by security groups was not always slow. It came from a hotfix where targeting items did not support nested groups. So, we fixed it, but with a cost. There are a few things you can do to combat the slowness. You could move the complex targeting items to an environment Preference item. Then, use the newly created environment for all future targeting items to determine which condition they should use. This gives you the behavior of a cache in that as long as the environment variable is present, you're golden. As always, thanks for reading and huge thanks for the feedback.
https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/askds/2011/06/13/target-group-policy-preferences-by-container-not-by-group/
Keith Crocker, the William Elliott Chaired Professor of Insurance and Risk Management, has been named chair of the Department of Risk Management in the Penn State Smeal College of Business. He succeeds Austin Jaffe, who was recently appointed associate dean of international programs. Crocker’s current research interests include the examination of tax and accounting fraud, claims fraud in the context of insurance settlements and the role of job attachment in the design of optimal employer-sponsored health insurance policies. In addition, he has served as an expert witness in cases involving antitrust and insurance concerns, including captive taxation and workers compensation. Before joining the Smeal faculty in 2003, he held the Waldo O. Hildebrand Professorship of Risk Management and Insurance at the University of Michigan. His previous experience includes positions at the University of Virginia and as a staff economist at the Federal Trade Commission. Crocker holds a bachelor’s degree in mathematics and economics from Washington and Lee University, and master’s and doctoral degrees in economics from Carnegie Mellon University.
https://news.psu.edu/story/324418/2014/09/16/academics/crocker-named-chair-smeals-department-risk-management
Social engineering is one of the new vectors cyber criminals employ to get the information they need to attack a system. In and of itself the information may not be much, but the attacker is able to cobble that nugget of data with other pieces and before long he has the mother lode. That is why ISSSource will occasionally run a series of basics on what someone should do to avoid an attack. This installment comes courtesy of US-CERT (United States Computer Emergency Readiness Team and it focuses on tips to avoid social engineering and spear phishing. The key takeaway from the whole process all companies should have a security plan in place and employees should have a working knowledge of what is in the plan. One of the first elements in the plan is do not give sensitive information to anyone unless you are they are who they claim to be and they should have access to the information. First, we should define what social engineering is all about. In a social engineering attack, an attacker uses human interaction (social skills) to obtain or compromise information about an organization or its computer systems. An attacker may seem unassuming and respectable, possibly claiming to be a new employee, repair person, or researcher and even offering credentials to support that identity. However, by asking questions, he or she may be able to piece together enough information to infiltrate an organization’s network. If an attacker is not able to gather enough information from one source, he or she may contact another source within the same organization and rely on the information from the first source to add to his or her credibility. Similarly, phishing is a form of social engineering. Phishing attacks use email or malicious websites to solicit personal information by posing as a trustworthy organization. An attacker may send email seemingly from a reputable credit card company or financial institution requesting account information, often suggesting there is a problem. When users respond with the requested information, attackers can use it to gain access to the accounts. Phishing attacks may also appear to come from other types of organizations, such as charities. Attackers often take advantage of current events and certain times of the year, such as natural disasters; epidemics and health scares; economic concerns; major political elections, and holidays. The following are some steps to take to avoid being a victim: • Be suspicious of unsolicited phone calls, visits, or email messages from individuals asking about employees or other internal information. If an unknown individual claims to be from a legitimate organization, try to verify his or her identity directly with the company. • Do not provide personal information or information about your organization, including its structure or networks, unless you are certain of a person’s authority to have the information. • Do not reveal personal or financial information in email, and do not respond to email solicitations for this information. This includes following links sent in email. • Don’t send sensitive information over the Internet before checking a website’s security. • Pay attention to the URL of a website. Malicious websites may look identical to a legitimate site, but the URL may use a variation in spelling or a different. • If you are unsure whether an email request is legitimate, try to verify it by contacting the company directly. Do not use contact information provided on a website connected to the request; instead, check previous statements for contact information. Information about known phishing attacks is also available online from groups such as the Anti-Phishing Working Group (http://www.antiphishing.org). • Install and maintain anti-virus software, firewalls, and email filters to reduce some of this traffic. • Take advantage of any anti-phishing features offered by your email client and web browser. Sometimes though, there may be a slip and you reveal some information you shouldn’t have. Here are some steps to take if you think you are a victim: • If you believe you might have revealed sensitive information about your organization, report it to the appropriate people within the organization, including network administrators. They can be alert for any suspicious or unusual activity. • If you believe you compromised your financial accounts, contact your financial institution immediately and close those accounts. Watch for any unexplainable charges to your account. • Immediately change any passwords you may have revealed. If you used the same password for multiple resources, make sure to change it for each account, and do not use that password in the future. • Watch for other signs of identity theft.
http://www.isssource.com/security-101-avoiding-social-engineering-phishing-attacks/
In a severe rebuke of one of the biggest suppliers of HTTPS credentials, Google Chrome developers announced plans to drastically restrict transport layer security certificates sold by Symantec-owned issuers following the discovery they have allegedly mis-issued more than 30,000 certificates. Effective immediately, Chrome plans to stop recognizing the extended validation status of all certificates issued by Symantec-owned certificate authorities, Ryan Sleevi, a software engineer on the Google Chrome team, said Thursday in an online forum. Extended validation certificates are supposed to provide enhanced assurances of a site's authenticity by showing the name of the validated domain name holder in the address bar. Under the move announced by Sleevi, Chrome will immediately stop displaying that information for a period of at least a year. In effect, the certificates will be downgraded to less-secure domain-validated certificates. More gradually, Google plans to update Chrome to effectively nullify all currently valid certificates issued by Symantec-owned CAs. With Symantec certificates representing more than 30 percent of the Internet's valid certificates by volume in 2015, the move has the potential to prevent millions of Chrome users from being able to access large numbers of sites. What's more, Sleevi cited Firefox data that showed Symantec-issued certificates are responsible for 42 percent of all certificate validations. To minimize the chances of disruption, Chrome will stagger the mass nullification in a way that requires they be replaced over time. To do this, Chrome will gradually decrease the "maximum age" of Symantec-issued certificates over a series of releases. Chrome 59 will limit the expiration to no more than 33 months after they were issued. By Chrome 64, validity would be limited to nine months. Thursday's announcement is only the latest development in Google's 18-month critique of practices by Symantec issuers. In October 2015, Symantec fired an undisclosed number of employees responsible for issuing test certificates for third-party domains without the permission of the domain holders. One of the extended-validation certificates covered google.com and www.google.com and would have given the person possessing it the ability to cryptographically impersonate those two addresses. A month later, Google pressured Symantec into performing a costly audit of its certificate issuance process after finding the mis-issuances went well beyond what Symantec had first revealed. In January, an independent security researcher unearthed evidence that Symantec improperly issued 108 new certificates. Thursday's announcement came after Google's investigation revealed that over a span of years, Symantec CAs have improperly issued more than 30,000 certificates. Such mis-issued certificates represent a potentially critical threat to virtually the entire Internet population because they make it possible for the holders to cryptographically impersonate the affected sites and monitor communications sent to and from the legitimate servers. They are a major violation of the so-called baseline requirements that major browser makers impose of CAs as a condition of being trusted by major browsers. In Thursday's post, Sleevi wrote: As captured in Chrome's Root Certificate Policy, root certificate authorities are expected to perform a number of critical functions commensurate with the trust granted to them. This includes properly ensuring that domain control validation is performed for server certificates, to audit logs frequently for evidence of unauthorized issuance, and to protect their infrastructure in order to minimize the ability for the issuance of fraudulent certs. On the basis of the details publicly provided by Symantec, we do not believe that they have properly upheld these principles, and as such, have created significant risk for Google Chrome users. Symantec allowed at least four parties access to their infrastructure in a way to cause certificate issuance, did not sufficiently oversee these capabilities as required and expected, and when presented with evidence of these organizations' failure to abide to the appropriate standard of care, failed to disclose such information in a timely manner or to identify the significance of the issues reported to them. These issues, and the corresponding failure of appropriate oversight, spanned a period of several years, and were trivially identifiable from the information publicly available or that Symantec shared. The full disclosure of these issues has taken more than a month. Symantec has failed to provide timely updates to the community regarding these issues. Despite having knowledge of these issues, Symantec has repeatedly failed to proactively disclose them. Further, even after issues have become public, Symantec failed to provide the information that the community required to assess the significance of these issues until they had been specifically questioned. The proposed remediation steps offered by Symantec have involved relying on known-problematic information or using practices insufficient to provide the level of assurance required under the Baseline Requirements and expected by the Chrome Root CA Policy. In an e-mailed statement, Symantec officials wrote: As the world’s leading cyber security company and the market leading Certificate Authority, we understand the importance of the trust chain we provide for our customers and everyone who uses the Internet. We learned of Google’s proposal when they posted it on their blog today. Their communication was unexpected and their proposed action is irresponsible. Our SSL/TLS certificate customers and partners need to know that this does not require any action at this time. Symantec's repeated violations underscore one of the problems Google and others have in enforcing terms of the baseline requirements. When violations are carried out by issuers with a big enough market share they're considered too big to fail. If Google were to nullify all of the Symantec-issued certificates overnight, it might cause widespread outages. The penalties outlined by Sleevi seem to be aimed at minimizing such disruptions while still exacting a meaningful punishment. The penalties immediately revoke only the status of extended validation certificates issued by Symantec, a move that is likely to be a major annoyance to many Symantec customers and their website visitors, but not make sites unavailable. The untrusting of all Symantec certificates, meanwhile, has a much higher potential of creating Internet-wide problems. As Sleevi explained it: "By phasing such changes in over a series of releases, we aim to minimize the impact any given release poses, while still continually making progress towards restoring the necessary level of security to ensure Symantec-issued certificates are as trustworthy as certificates from other CAs." Update 3/24/2017 08:22 PDT: In a blog post published Friday morning, Symantec officials once again criticized the Google post. The officials also disputed the 30,000 certificate figure. "Google's statements about our issuance practices and the scope of our past mis-issuances are exaggerated and misleading," they wrote. "For example, Google’s claim that we have mis-issued 30,000 SSL/TLS certificates is not true. In the event Google is referring to, 127 certificates—not 30,000—were identified as mis-issued, and they resulted in no consumer harm. We have taken extensive remediation measures to correct this situation, immediately terminated the involved partner’s appointment as a registration authority (RA), and in a move to strengthen the trust of Symantec-issued SSL/TLS certificates, announced the discontinuation of our RA program." In an e-mail, Google officials wrote: "We appreciate Symantec's response. This remains an ongoing discussion, and we look forward to continuing our conversations with Symantec about this issue. We want to enable an open and transparent assessment of the compatibility and interoperability risks, relative to potential security threats to our users."
https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2017/03/google-takes-symantec-to-the-woodshed-for-mis-issuing-30000-https-certs/
In this post, we're gonna continue our forensic analysis of a network capture through Wireshark. This time I decided to use My mac directly instead of virtual machines, because commands seem to work much better. I was actually able to have output from some commands, unlike Kali. I used a sort of cheat sheet, a list of commands I want to show you. I'm sorry but comments are in Italian. We're gonna use the same capture file as before, but this time we'll be delving much more into our analysis. Encrypted beacon frames We're going to use the following command: tcpdump -nne -r /Users/mattia/Desktop/gunman1-01.cap 'wlan[0]=0x80' In the above command, wlan[0]=0x80 represent the beacon frame type. The command returns the number of encrypted beacon frames in our capture file. Beacon frames are transmitted periodically to announce the presence of a wireless LAN. They are transmitted by the access point (AP) in an infrastructure basic service set (BSS). In IBSS network, beacon generation is distributed among the stations. We see we got a bunch of encrypted beacon frames. We can isolate the ones we want by using grep to find the frames related to LoneGunman. tshark '(wlan.fc.type_subtype==0x20) & (wlan.fc.protected==1) & (wlan.bssid==00:0D:88:B6:F7:1E)' | wc -l In this command, wlan.fc.type_subtype==0x20 represents data management frame, wlan.fc.protected==1 indicates encryption is enabled on the WAP. So we find 66 nearby stations and 66 frames were exchanged between out rogue access point and other devices. Number of aggregated frames sent out by each MAC address: We can break down those 66 frames with this command. 51 out of 66 frames were transmitted by the rogue access point (around 77% of overall traffic) Destination addresses for frames: We can break down the frames based on destination MAC address and we find out that most frames (59 out of 66, about 89%) were sent to the broadcast MAC address. Frames breakdown for both source and destination MAC address: That tells us 50 frames out of 66 (around 75%) were sent by the rogue access point to the broadcast MAC address. The other station exchanged around 13% of traffic (9 frames) with the broadcast MAC address, as well. This appears to be an anomaly in our network traffic and we'll analyze it much closer. Number of aggregated frames transmitted by each MAC address: This confirms again 59 frames were exchanged between the rogue access point and the broadcast MAC address. I already stated this is something suspicious. In fact, a plausible reason for it to occur could be an ARP request from clients. However, the number of such requests appears to be abnormally high, compared with other stations. A more plausible explanation for such a behavior could be an attack on the wireless network. More specifically, as the WAP supports WEP, it's totally possible that a WEP cracking attack was in progress. Such attack is performed by sending out many 802.11 data frames, in order for the attacker to trigger other stations on the network to respond. One of the best ways to do that is to replay ARP requests. In this type of attack the attacker listens for data frames sent to the broadcast MAC address, primarily ARP requests, and replays to them thereby speeding up the WEP-cracking attack. At the time, I was in fact able to break the WEP encryption. We can also have statistics for type of traffic. Only 1 frame was returned as association response. Wrap-up We were able to delve much more into our traffic capture with Wireshark, tshark and tcpdump. And actually tshark maybe allows a little more flexibility than Wireshark. Wireshark can also be used for hacking and pentesting, other then for forensics purposes, but we'll maybe analyze it in another post. It's a tool that can be used for good or bad, depending on who uses it.
https://savvygeektips.blogspot.com/2017/08/tips-for-information-security.html
Just a month after becoming the first Canadian crypto trading platform to get registered by the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC), Coinsquare suffered a data breach that compromised users’ personal information. On Nov. 19, Coinsquare had to temporarily shut down operations to investigate an unusual activity on its platform. However, several days of proactive measures allowed Coinsquare to resume operations gradually. We will be re-enabling crypto deposits shortly after the maintenance window with crypto withdrawals to follow shortly after. — Coinsquare (@Coinsquare) November 22, 2022 In a follow-up email to investors, Coinsquare admitted that their customer database with personal information was exposed during the incident, which a third party most likely accessed. The leaked database included users’ personal information, such as names, email addresses, residential addresses, phone numbers, dates of birth, device IDs, public wallet addresses, transaction history, and account balances. Coinsquare further confirmed that no passwords were exposed, adding that: “We note that your assets have always been, and remain, secure in cold storage and are not at risk.” While the exchange has not detected any bad actors from accessing the breached information, the official communication cautions users to change their passwords, enable 2-Factor Authentication (2FA) and use different credentials for different platforms. Coinsquare has not yet responded to Cointelegraph’s request for comment. Related: Coinsquare becomes first Canadian crypto exchange to receive IIROC registration Canadian crypto exchange Bitvo was able to back off its acquisition agreement with FTX thanks to the deal’s long approval process by local regulators. The firm emphasized that its operations have not been affected, as Bitvo has no material exposure to FTX or any of its affiliated entities.
https://filmefast.one/2022/11/26/iiroc-registered-canadian-crypto-exchange-coinsquare-suffers-data-breach/
Technological progress has led to a higher incidence of cyberattacks. The big technology cycles of today: e-commerce, mobile payments, cloud computing, Big Data, IoT, AI, and social media, all increase the cyber risk for users and businesses. But what is cybersecurity in business and what are its trends? The nature of the threats is becoming more diverse. The list includes advanced persistent threats (APTs), distributed denial-of-service (DDoS), viruses, worms, malware, ransomware, spyware, botnets, spam, spoofing, phishing, hacktivism and potential state-sanctioned cyberwarfare. Cybersecurity is difficult to ensure against precisely because the types of cybercrime differ, the motivations for these crimes differ, the assets targeted differ, and the remedies differ. Whereas most types of criminal activity have a single target, to steal money, and a single motive, to get rich, cybercrime is different. It has many motives, can come in many forms, and can be committed by a host of different types of attackers, known as threat actors. Motives can range from extortion to theft to industrial espionage to revenge or simply attention-seeking. Cybercrimes can be committed by a vast range of potential suspects, from organized crime syndicates to hackers to disgruntled employees to terrorists to nation-states, and they can target a wide array of assets, from personal information on laptops to corporate IT infrastructure to commercial secrets to physical infrastructure to social media accounts. Add to that the technology dimension: for each new technological cycle, such as the IoT or AI, there are associated new cyber threats. Traditionally, most companies have adopted a prevention-based approach to cybersecurity, but recent advances in technology areas like machine learning are enabling a move towards active detection of threats. This allows pre-emptive action to be taken to stop breaches before they occur and also serves to free up resources currently occupied with chasing false positives from existing, more reactive systems. Spending on artificial intelligence (AI)-infused cybersecurity tools will increase significantly over the coming years. Another growth area will be unified threat management (UTM), which can tackle diverse threats and also address the issues faced by companies that find themselves with myriad security products from a wide variety of vendors, resulting in a security landscape that lacks coherence. In today’s digital economy, it is essential that companies of every stripe can collect, store and adequately protect customer data and proprietary secrets. Failure to do so will significantly damage a company’s brand and reduce the quality of the product it produces, with concomitant impact on revenues and profitability. Cybersecurity has, therefore, become a critical business function, yet it remains a non-core competence for a significant number of boards. Chief information security officers (CISOs) have become increasingly common in recent years, recent research suggests that nearly two-thirds of large US companies now have a CISO position, but the majority do not report directly to the CEO, reducing their effectiveness. The frequency of cyberattacks is only likely to accelerate over the coming years, therefore it is vital that senior executives have a full understanding of the inherent risks and implications. Deep learning is a field of machine learning, an AI technology which allows machines to learn by using algorithms to interpret data from connected ‘things’ to predict outcomes and learn from successes and failures. Deep learning systems are built using artificial neural networks that model the way neurons in the human brain talk to each other. A properly trained neural network can, therefore, distinguish between signals and general noise. There are a number of reasons why AI and deep learning are beginning to make their way into the cybersecurity industry. These include a shortage of cyber engineering specialists, too many cybersecurity vendors, too many false positives, and a growing army of hackers who are often better equipped, better funded, and clever enough to exploit an ever-expanding attack surface. Take the example of advanced persistent denial-of-service (APDoS) attacks, whereby hackers use automated bots to generate large volumes of attack traffic quickly and maintain a long-term threat. The express purpose of an APDoS attack is to extract sensitive corporate data rather than merely bring down a website, the traditional purpose of a DoS attack. By diverting the IT department’s attention to fighting off the APDoS attack, the attacker can launch multi-vector attacks against the true target, such as confidential design blueprints, that go unnoticed. Hackers have the advantage of the element of surprise and often attacks go unnoticed for months or even years. Machine learning technologies offer ways for an organization to parse real-time information from across their network, allowing them to uncover potential threats before they hit. They may also uncover the areas where the network is most vulnerable. AI could help security professionals spend more time focusing on real threats and taking the right actions to remediate them. The cybersecurity story… how did cybersecurity get here and where is it going? 1971: The first computer virus, known as “The Creeper,” was purposely designed and released on ARPANET and copied itself to the remote system displaying the words: “I am the Creeper: Catch me if you can.” 1982: The first large-scale computer virus outbreak was caused by “Elk Cloner,” a virus developed by a 15-year-old high school student as a practical joke. Elk Cloner was spread by floppy disks and affected the Apple II operating system. 1986: The first Computer Fraud and Abuse Act was passed, defining Federal computer-related crimes and associated penalties. 1988: Cornell graduate Robert Morris created and deployed the first worm. It was an aggressive, self-propagating virus that crippled 10% of the 88,000 computers on the ARPANET, which by 1990 became the internet. 1999: The Melissa and ILOVEYOU worms infected tens of millions of PCs across the world, causing email systems to fail. 2000: The Council of Europe drafted a Cybercrime Treaty to promote the international harmonization of laws against computer crimes. 2002: A DDoS attack struck al 13 DNS root name servers, knocking out all but five. This was the first attempt to disable the internet itself rather than individual hosts or enclaves. 2008: An employee at the US Central Command put a “candy drop” flash drive he found in the HQ car park into his laptop and exposed data on classified and unclassified systems. 2012: General Keith Alexander, the US’s cybersecurity chief, said the loss of industrial information and intellectual property through cyber espionage constituted the “greatest transfer of wealth in history,” referring to Chinese state-sponsored hackers. 2013: US retailer Target suffered a data breach whereby the personal data of 40 million credit card customers was compromised. Access was gained via a third-party air conditioning supplier’s control systems and exacerbated by Target’s weak internal segregation of network systems. 2014: Serious data breaches were suffered by Sony Pictures, JP Morgan, and Apple’s iCloud servers in China. 2015: Serious data breaches were suffered by the US Office of Personnel Management, TalkTalk, and Ashley Madison. 2015: US officials announced that Russian hackers gained access to White House and State Department emails in 2014. 2015: The deadline passed for EMV chip card acceptance at the point of sale (POS), prompting many warnings to e-commerce merchants that fraudsters will step up their attacks against card-not-present transactions. 2015: The major card networks continued their push of tokenization for securing mobile and online transactions, including efforts to embed the technology in their own payment products, such as Mastercard’s Masterpass. 2016: Yahoo revealed a 2014 breach of 500 million users’ personal details – the largest such breach in history. 2016: The EU NIS Directive came into force. 2017: WannaCry ransomware attack, which targeted computers running the Microsoft Windows operating systems, affects more than 200,000 computers across 150 countries. 2018: Intel reports Meltdown and Spectre vulnerabilities in its chips, which allows a rogue developer to read a chip’s memory. 2018: The EU NIS Directive may be transposed into national laws in each EU member state. 2018: GDPR comes into force across EU countries. 2021: The worldwide cybersecurity market is expected to reach $140bn. This article was produced in association with GlobalData Thematic research. More details here about how to access in-depth reports and detailed thematic scorecard rankings.
https://www.verdict.co.uk/what-is-cybersecurity-in-business/
China has given the world the finest example of content filtering there ever was in the Great Firewall. This system processes a ton of traffic flowing in and out of the country and filters the content that goes around within the country. It is the tightest Internet regulatory system on the planet, blocking most of the world’s websites and much of the chatter at home as well. The people are afraid to speak because it could mean that the police would suddenly come to drag them away to prison. Some of the best VPNs still work in China, but the government has banned these, which means fines and harsh punishment if anyone is caught using one. Russia has offered an alternative method of dealing with free thinkers. The government there offers a hefty reward for information on an effective way to create a peephole into the Tor network. Russia is hungry for Tor traffic because it is encrypted and therefore the only type of Traffic that the government’s regulators cannot spy on. Tor is free and is therefore also used by most people who are trying to preserve their right to privacy. The Kazakh government has seen and heard this all, and is now preparing to set up its own system for accessing encrypted Internet traffic. Like most eavesdroppers, they have this paranoid delusion that everyone who uses encryption is plotting against them. They want to know everything that is going on, but breaking encryption is too big an endeavor, as they have learned from the failed attempts of the NSA. So how are they going to gain access to encrypted data without breaking the technology? Trickery To be able to access all the traffic that passes over the Internet, there must be no encryption that keeps some data secret. To decrypt encrypted data, a key must be applied. Only those who have encrypted the data have the keys. Therefore, the government of Kazakhstan needs to obtain the decryption keys from the Internet users that they want to spy on. Users who use encryption value security and privacy, and are not likely to hand over their keys to a government that spies on them. So the government has prepared a clever bit of trickery to get people to hand them over. From next month, all Internet Service Providers in Kazakhstan are going to begin disseminating to their customers something that the government is calling a national security certificate. Some have actually already been sent out to Internet subscribers. The certificate covers all Internet users running any operating system. This so-called certificate is disguised as a helpful security tool that will make sure people who employ its “coded access protocols” to view foreign websites are protected. Roughly translated, the certificate will be able to see and copy the keys of any user who employs security tools. The certificate is really a man-in-the-middle attack. It cracks open all HTTPS traffic, including online account credentials, banking and shopping transactions. It is surely not the first time that a government has claimed to be taking the people’s interests to heart as it deployed systems that would actually do harm. Users’ security is certainly not being guaranteed by this certificate; rather, it is being violated by the government and put at risk to boot. Governments really are supposed to preserve and uphold citizens’ rights, ensuring that they are protected by the rule of law. But increasingly, governments are throwing the law aside to make way for their personal desires. They are also supposed to hold citizens’ safety as a priority, but they actually only care about extending their rule and expanding their powers while in office. By taking encryption keys and spying on secured traffic, they are putting the people in danger. As they decrypt traffic and data, they expose it and the people who sent it. The result will be a government who is very happy to have access to everything that goes on online, and a citizenry plagued by online theft and fraud. On top of destroying the real protections that Internet users have, meddling with encryption will in many cases invalidate the data being sent. The data packets will be resealed, so to speak, but the tampering will be obvious. The recipient will therefore likely reject it, meaning that it will never reach its destination. Internet users in Kazakhstan will be left to deal with a bunch of validation errors that they have no idea how to fix, and really can’t. We are not confident that the Kazakh government’s plan will work, but we are sure that it is going to be a giant, crazy mess if it does.
https://www.vpnserviceyes.com/blog/kazakhstan-con-users-give-encryption-keys/
WinWebServer (WWS) is easily configured to automatically check the service integrity of all system components including the web servers, application servers, and the database servers. The diagnostic information is also published as XML status reports that can optionally be accessed by third party management systems. The WWS integrity monitoring also includes automated checks to prevent DNS attacks against the corporate websites. The WWS integrity monitoring simulates real transaction workload and the intelligent diagnostics accurately identifies any faults or performance bottlenecks. With WWS it is easy to optimally balance the workload across the available hardware resources to ensure the maximum service availability and responsiveness. WinWebServer (WWS) provides effective diagnostic information at a variety of levels to simplify and fast track the investigation and resolution of problems. For example, transaction summary details and easy access to electronic journals give a rapid understanding of the overall status of an ATM device. In many cases this information is enough to correctly identify and resolve fault conditions. In addition, WWS also provides interactive access to the Smart Client on the remote ATM for a more detailed analysis of the device’s peripherals and operation. WWS also provides an intensive diagnostic option for particularly obscure faults. The extensive range of diagnostic information combined with the ability to remotely control the remote resolution options ensures that downtime and onsite maintenance is kept to an absolute minimum resulting in significant cost savings and greater consumer satisfaction.
https://www.aurigaspa.com/en/banking/products-and-solutions/shared-services/proactive-network-monitoring/
In the (new) domain of cybersecurity in the automotive value chain, a large number of national and international authorities and other institutions have far-reaching impact. The different spheres of influence reach so far that regulations and requirements even have a direct effect on the own organization and the daily work on processes, work products and related framework conditions. This video course is made for all those who want to have a holistic view of automotive cybersecurity today and want to better understand the background and context. In this video course, you will learn about the different types of authorities and understand why they have such a special importance for the daily work around cybersecurity. Looking at Europe, the USA and the Asia / Pacific region, you will get a wide-ranging overview of which institutions exist in the field of cybersecurity. Additionally, you will get to know these most important authorities and their respective scope: in Europe e.g. ENX Association, ENISA and VDA, in the USA e.g. Auto-ISAC, NHTSA and SAE and in the Asia / Pacific region e.g. CAC, SAC and others. Finally, some of the most important laws and regulations with impact on cybersecurity are presented in a quick overview. I. Intro to Role of Governments and Authorities (Summary) Video Course What is the role of national and international authorities in cybersecurity and which associations explicitly deal with the automotive industry and in what way? In the first part of the video, the short Intro gives you an overview of what you will learn in this video course. II. Importance of governments and authorities There are a variety of different authorities that have an impact on the domain of cybersecurity in the automotive industry. Here we make a distinction of what different types of authorities exist and break down in detail exactly what their different roles and areas of influence are. III. Cybersecurity authorities around the world: a detailed look at the cybersecurity authorities of the U.S., Europe and China In this part of the video course, you will get a detailed overview of the most important authorities that play a role in cybersecurity in the automotive industry. We will first look at Europe, then the United States of America and last but not least the Asia / Pacific region, including the People’s Republic of China. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it. OkNoPrivacy policy You can revoke your consent any time using the Revoke consent button. Revoke cookies
https://www.cyres-consulting.com/automotive-cybersecurity-online-courses/authorities-and-institutions-for-automotive-cybersecurity/
link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. Certainly, you are making a good point. That is why often risk management is used in relation to IT security. Besides the identification of assets, threat agents, threats and vulnerabilities[1], probabilities are also applied. So, you are counting in the probability in order to make a decision. This is [1] http://tazforum.blogspot.com/ (see "identifying the assets and their values", which was a contribution of mine in a discussion and made a blog entry). [2] http://antionline.com/showpost.php?p...4&postcount=12 If the only tool you have is a hammer, you tend to see every problem as a nail. (Abraham Maslow, Psychologist, 1908-70)
http://www.antionline.com/showthread.php?275672-General-cryptography-question&p=927228