----- | |
--- 14902012 | |
Was Ted a libertarian | |
--- 14902016 | |
No Ted's just a really typical far-right reactionary | |
--- 14902019 | |
>>14902016 | |
Okay but what does right mean here? | |
What does he have in common with fascism? | |
--- 14902023 | |
>>14902012 (OP) | |
No, cause libs usually approve of tech and industrialisation | |
--- 14902088 | |
>>14902019 | |
Far-right reactionary means that he triggers any retard who believes in a mechanized utopia. | |
The first post is a practical example of assmad progressive. | |
--- 14902153 | |
>>14902012 (OP) | |
>>14902088 | |
Pretty much every contemporary political ideology is talking about how post-industrial society should be structured, he argued that it shouldn't exist. I don't think you'll have much luck with normal political labels. He was a reactionary in technical sense that he wanted to reverse a change in society, but the people we generally use that term for aren't interested in reversing the industrial revolution | |
--- 14902249 | |
>>14902012 (OP) | |
He was for in theory what Pol Pot put into practice. I.e. a revolutionary Luddite | |
--- 14902627 | |
>>14902012 (OP) | |
He was schizophrenic | |
--- 14903467 | |
>>14902019 | |
it means he was a schizo retard | |
--- 14903700 | |
>>14902019 | |
At this point in the degeneration of civilisation 'LE RITE WANG!!!!!!' just means 'a person I disagree with and want to ignore without considering anything they're thinking/saying/doing'. It's another thought terminating cliche. | |
--- 14903705 | |
>>14902012 (OP) | |
No because the only way to implement his ideas would be with a very strong government telling people what to do. | |
--- 14903757 | |
>>14902019 | |
Did you read the first few pages? The first thing he put in the thing is a critique of leftist psychology and activist | |
--- 14903777 | |
also green politics and ecofascism would be some good things to read about | |
you need context for everything don’t be delusional | |