chunk_id
stringlengths 3
9
| chunk
stringlengths 1
100
|
---|---|
9858_73
|
previously, had not been in the same analytical grouping. According to the scholar of esotericism
|
9858_74
|
Wouter J. Hanegraaff, the term provided a "useful generic label" for "a large and complicated group
|
9858_75
|
of historical phenomena that had long been perceived as sharing an air de famille."
|
9858_76
|
Various academics have emphasised that esotericism is a phenomenon unique to the Western world. As
|
9858_77
|
Faivre stated, an "empirical perspective" would hold that "esotericism is a Western notion." As
|
9858_78
|
scholars such as Faivre and Hanegraaff have pointed out, there is no comparable category of
|
9858_79
|
"Eastern" or "Oriental" esotericism. The emphasis on Western esotericism was nevertheless primarily
|
9858_80
|
devised to distinguish the field from a universal esotericism. Hanegraaff has characterised these
|
9858_81
|
as "recognisable world views and approaches to knowledge that have played an important though
|
9858_82
|
always controversial role in the history of Western culture". Historian of religion Henrik Bogdan
|
9858_83
|
asserted that Western esotericism constituted "a third pillar of Western culture" alongside
|
9858_84
|
"doctrinal faith and rationality", being deemed heretical by the former and irrational by the
|
9858_85
|
latter. Scholars nevertheless recognise that various non-Western traditions have exerted "a
|
9858_86
|
profound influence" over Western esotericism, citing the prominent example of the Theosophical
|
9858_87
|
Society's incorporation of Hindu and Buddhist concepts like reincarnation into its doctrines. Given
|
9858_88
|
these influences and the imprecise nature of the term "Western", the scholar of esotericism Kennet
|
9858_89
|
Granholm has argued that academics should cease referring to "Western esotericism" altogether,
|
9858_90
|
instead simply favouring "esotericism" as a descriptor of this phenomenon. Egil Asprem has endorsed
|
9858_91
|
this approach.
|
9858_92
|
Definition
|
9858_93
|
The historian of esotericism Antoine Faivre noted that "never a precise term, [esotericism] has
|
9858_94
|
begun to overflow its boundaries on all sides", with both Faivre and Karen-Claire Voss stating that
|
9858_95
|
Western esotericism consists of "a vast spectrum of authors, trends, works of philosophy, religion,
|
9858_96
|
art, literature, and music".
|
9858_97
|
Scholars broadly agree on which currents of thought fall within a category of esotericism—ranging
|
9858_98
|
from ancient Gnosticism and Hermetism through to Rosicrucianism and the Kabbalah and on to more
|
9858_99
|
recent phenomenon such as the New Age movement. Nevertheless, esotericism itself remains a
|
9858_100
|
controversial term, with scholars specialising in the subject disagreeing as to best define it.
|
9858_101
|
Esotericism as a universal, secret, inner tradition
|
9858_102
|
Some scholars have used Western esotericism to refer to "inner traditions" concerned with a
|
9858_103
|
"universal spiritual dimension of reality, as opposed to the merely external ('exoteric') religious
|
9858_104
|
institutions and dogmatic systems of established religions." This approach views Western
|
9858_105
|
esotericism as just one variant of a worldwide esotericism at the heart of all world religions and
|
9858_106
|
cultures, reflecting a hidden esoteric reality. This use is closest to the original meaning of the
|
9858_107
|
word in late antiquity, where it applied to secret spiritual teachings that were reserved for a
|
9858_108
|
specific elite and hidden from the masses. This definition was popularised in the published work of
|
9858_109
|
nineteenth-century esotericists like A.E. Waite, who sought to combine their own mystical beliefs
|
9858_110
|
with a historical interpretation of esotericism. It subsequently became a popular approach within
|
9858_111
|
several esoteric movements, most notably Martinism and Traditionalism.
|
9858_112
|
This definition, originally developed by esotericists themselves, became popular among French
|
9858_113
|
academics during the 1980s, exerting a strong influence over the scholars Mircea Eliade, Henry
|
9858_114
|
Corbin, and the early work of Faivre. Within the academic field of religious studies, those who
|
9858_115
|
study different religions in search of an inner universal dimension to them all are termed
|
9858_116
|
"religionists". Such religionist ideas also exerted an influence on more recent scholars like
|
9858_117
|
Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke and Arthur Versluis.
|
9858_118
|
Versluis for instance defined "Western esotericism" as "inner or hidden spiritual knowledge
|
9858_119
|
transmitted through Western European historical currents that in turn feed into North American and
|
9858_120
|
other non-European settings". He added that these Western esoteric currents all shared a core
|
9858_121
|
characteristic, "a claim to gnosis, or direct spiritual insight into cosmology or spiritual
|
9858_122
|
insight", and accordingly he suggested that these currents could be referred to as "Western
|
9858_123
|
gnostic" just as much as "Western esoteric".
|
9858_124
|
There are various problems with this model for understanding Western esotericism. The most
|
9858_125
|
significant is that it rests upon the conviction that there really is a "universal, hidden,
|
9858_126
|
esoteric dimension of reality" that objectively exists. The existence of this universal inner
|
9858_127
|
tradition has not been discovered through scientific or scholarly enquiry; this had led some to
|
9858_128
|
claim that it does not exist, though Hanegraaff thought it better to adopt a view based in
|
9858_129
|
methodological agnosticism by stating that "we simply do not know - and cannot know" if it exists
|
9858_130
|
or not. He noted that, even if such a true and absolute nature of reality really existed, it would
|
9858_131
|
only be accessible through "esoteric" spiritual practices, and could not be discovered or measured
|
9858_132
|
by the "exoteric" tools of scientific and scholarly enquiry. Hanegraaff pointed out that an
|
9858_133
|
approach that seeks a common inner hidden core of all esoteric currents masks that such groups
|
9858_134
|
often differ greatly, being rooted in their own historical and social contexts and expressing
|
9858_135
|
mutually exclusive ideas and agendas. A third issue was that many of those currents widely
|
9858_136
|
recognised as esoteric never concealed their teachings, and in the twentieth century came to
|
9858_137
|
permeate popular culture, thus problematizing the claim that esotericism could be defined by its
|
9858_138
|
hidden and secretive nature. Moreover, Hanegraaff noted that when scholars adopt this definition,
|
9858_139
|
it shows that they subscribe to the religious doctrines espoused by the very groups they are
|
9858_140
|
studying.
|
9858_141
|
Esotericism as an enchanted world view
|
9858_142
|
Another approach to Western esotericism treats it as a world view that embraces "enchantment" in
|
9858_143
|
contrast to world views influenced by post-Cartesian, post-Newtonian, and positivist science that
|
9858_144
|
sought to "dis-enchant" the world. That approach understands esotericism as comprising those world
|
9858_145
|
views that eschew a belief in instrumental causality and instead adopt a belief that all parts of
|
9858_146
|
the universe are interrelated without a need for causal chains. It stands as a radical alternative
|
9858_147
|
to the disenchanted world views that have dominated Western culture since the scientific
|
9858_148
|
revolution, and must therefore always be at odds with secular culture.
|
9858_149
|
An early exponent of this definition was the historian of Renaissance thought Frances Yates in her
|
9858_150
|
discussions of a Hermetic Tradition, which she saw as an "enchanted" alternative to established
|
9858_151
|
religion and rationalistic science. However, the primary exponent of this view was Faivre, who
|
9858_152
|
published a series of criteria for how to define "Western esotericism" in 1992. Faivre claimed that
|
9858_153
|
esotericism was "identifiable by the presence of six fundamental characteristics or components",
|
9858_154
|
four of which were "intrinsic" and thus vital to defining something as being esoteric, while the
|
9858_155
|
other two were "secondary" and thus not necessarily present in every form of esotericism. He listed
|
9858_156
|
these characteristics as follows:
|
9858_157
|
"Correspondences": This is the idea that there are both real and symbolic correspondences existing
|
9858_158
|
between all things within the universe. As examples for this, Faivre pointed to the esoteric
|
9858_159
|
concept of the macrocosm and microcosm, often presented as the dictum of "as above, so below", as
|
9858_160
|
well as the astrological idea that the actions of the planets have a direct corresponding influence
|
9858_161
|
on the behaviour of human beings.
|
9858_162
|
"Living Nature": Faivre argued that all esotericists envision the natural universe as being imbued
|
9858_163
|
with its own life force, and that as such they understand it as being "complex, plural,
|
9858_164
|
hierarchical".
|
9858_165
|
"Imagination and Mediations": Faivre believed that all esotericists place great emphasis on both
|
9858_166
|
the human imagination, and mediations—"such as rituals, symbolic images, mandalas, intermediary
|
9858_167
|
spirits"—and mantras as tools that provide access to worlds and levels of reality existing between
|
9858_168
|
the material world and the divine.
|
9858_169
|
"Experience of Transmutation": Faivre's fourth intrinsic characteristic of esotericism was the
|
9858_170
|
emphasis that esotericists place on fundamentally transforming themselves through their practice,
|
9858_171
|
for instance through the spiritual transformation that is alleged to accompany the attainment of
|
9858_172
|
gnosis.
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.