dedup-isc-ft-v107-score
float64 0.32
1
| uid
stringlengths 32
32
| text
stringlengths 0
32.5k
| paper_id
stringlengths 1
14
| original_image_filename
stringlengths 5
222
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
0.510648 | d8498d656fe5400dadc809f1326624a6 | The optimal mean unambiguous identification probability p^(N)_max(d) as a function of the number of the copies (N) of the reference states. As N increases, p^(N)_max(d) approaches the mean optimal unambiguous discrimination probability shown by the horizontal lines. | quant | ph0510015-fig2.jpg |
0.42241 | 2f9659b6ef364c8fa6e3fff6961136f6 | (Color online) The input/output concurrence diagram for both families of states ϱ_1,ϱ_2 and for the depolarizing channel with p=1/2. The states from the counterexample 1 discussed in the paper are displayed and the change in the ordering is visible. The region under the line C^ out=C^ in represents the allowed region that is achievable by local channels. Concurrence is measured in dimensionless units. | quant | ph0510017-fig.jpg |
0.477188 | 24c7a72b8d164dc5947d1b4dad40755f | Qubit loss error correction circuit. In this example, the first qubit of the GBP code is lost to the environment. Quantum non-demolition measurements (QND) indicate the location of the error and trigger the conditional source (CS) to inject a new atom in state |0 into the optical lattice site. A projective measurement (PM) purifies the mixed state resulting from tracing out the lost qubit. Subsequent single qubit and two qubit operations reconstruct the encoded logical qubit. | quant | ph0510021-vala_fig1.jpg |
0.431694 | fc8745cf39994d7c8af75a86274fefbb | Scheme illustrating the implementation of the quantum non-demolition measurement using the cavity QED system. | quant | ph0510021-vala_fig2.jpg |
0.554432 | 30a93f634aee4fc2895f19c6d372e497 | Scheme illustrating the projective measurement of a qubit encoded in the hyperfine structure of the Rb electronic ground state manifold. | quant | ph0510021-vala_fig3.jpg |
0.427473 | f8eb3dccb5264418978d9fa1638990c1 | Entanglement detection with semi-definite programming. For each value of transmission, the area below the corresponding line belongs to parameter pairs outcome overlap vs. quadrature variance for which entanglement can be ensured. | quant | ph0510022-losses.jpg |
0.418899 | 93b627f236d04acaa8f839452b5b2709 | A POVM attack by Eve realized by U_B E_1 E_2. | quant | ph0510025-attack1.jpg |
0.470991 | 3fe80358c148481d9a65b5895d26b579 | An EDP version of the BB84 protocol. Shor and Preskill <cit.> showed that it can be reduced to BB84. Note that only the EPR pairs to which Alice and Bob apply the same rotations are shown; EPR pairs with different rotations are discarded. | quant | ph0510025-bb84epr1.jpg |
0.461973 | 53ab4892af2444d8b3788fbf42e52625 | B step: Alice performs a bilateral XOR on her halves of two EPR pairs (the circuit of which is depicted) and Bob performs the same on his halves of the EPR pairs. They measure the target qubits in the Z basis. If their measurement results are same, they keep the source EPR pair and discard the target; otherwise, they discard both EPR pairs. | quant | ph0510025-bstep.jpg |
0.464423 | 9c4793a8c7114d29a2e3ca8f9874e9ff | The optimal μ's for achieving the highest key generation rate at each distance for SARG04 using eqn-decoySARG04rate1 and for BB84 using eqn-decoyBB84rate1. Three sets of parameters are plotted. The bottom two, middle two, and top two curves for BB84 and SARG04 used the same parameters except for e_detector (which are 0.033, 0.01, and 0.0001, respectively). The other common parameters are listed in Table <ref> and f(E_μ)=1.22. When the misalignment of the detector is large (i.e. large e_detector) as in the bottom two curves, BB84 uses a laser with a higher optimal mean photon number than SARG04. When the misalignment becomes smaller as in the top two curves, the situation is reversed; SARG04 operates optimally with a higher μ than BB84 does. Also, note that the optimal μ for SARG04 can be higher than one. | quant | ph0510025-decoy-optimal-mu1.jpg |
0.399481 | 41b1cbe4648844c5914d820aff575771 | Calculation of measurement probabilities with misalignment of the detectors for the basis {↔,↗}. The misalignment is modeled by a rotation of the two measurement bases, θ. For this basis, the conclusive results are ↕ and ↖. | quant | ph0510025-decoy1.jpg |
0.463581 | 03101b9c745a49bea7ad6b7667269a1f | Simulation using the GYS parameters listed in Table <ref> and f(E_μ)=1.22, for both SARG04 and BB84. We compare the key generation rates of SARG04 and BB84 using decoy states (solid curves) and without using decoy states (dashed curves). The optimal mean photon numbers, μ, for all curves are used at all distances. Two curves of SARG04 using decoy are plotted, one with both single- and two-photon contributions and the other with only single-photon contributions. Also, curves of single-photon SARG04 and of BB84 using GLLP without decoy are plotted. The maximal secure distance is 97.2km for SARG04 and 141.8km for BB84. However, the upper bounds for SARG04 and for BB84 are exactly the same, namely, 207.68 km. | quant | ph0510025-decoygraph1.jpg |
0.521842 | 82f8a5da4a5c4c3eb6a070be00a75635 | Simulation using α=0.25, η_Bob=0.1, e_detector=0, p_dark=10^-5 (from <cit.>), and f(E_μ)=1, for both SARG04 and BB84. We compare the key generation rates of SARG04 and BB84 using decoy states (solid curves) and without using decoy states (dashed curves). The optimal mean photon numbers, μ, all curves are used at all distance. Two curves of SARG04 using decoy are plotted, one with both single- and two-photon contributions and the other with only single-photon contributions. Also, curves of single-photon SARG04 and of BB84 using GLLP without decoy are plotted. | quant | ph0510025-decoygraph1b.jpg |
0.448639 | 2c9bfcb540fc413ca079dcbd0e42fac0 | P step: Alice adds (module 2) her halves of three EPR pairs (the circuit of which is depicted) and Bob performs the same on his halves of the EPR pairs. They keep the target EPR pair and discard the other two. The X measurements of the two source pairs do not need to be performed in a prepare-and-measure QKD. | quant | ph0510025-pstep.jpg |
0.516462 | b0eb3c23931c47e8a597f014ffd84927 | An EDP version of the SARG04 protocol. Alice prepares an entangled states |Ψ⟩_AB=(|0_z⟩_A |φ_0^⊗ν⟩_B + |1_z⟩_A |φ_1^⊗ν⟩_B)/√(2) where ν=1,2 corresponds to the number of photons emitted by Alice. She applies a random rotation on system B before sending it to Bob through Eve. In the case of ν=2, Eve retains one qubit of system B and sends the other to Bob. Although, only one entangled state is shown for simplicify, one should be reminded that Eve may perform the most general attack on the N entangled states as in Fig .<ref>. | quant | ph0510025-sarg04epr1.jpg |
0.471002 | 8ab99c4a594b4679b174c0f7bdf71788 | The highest tolerable bit error rates with various maximum number of B or P steps allowed. It turns out only B steps are used in all cases to achieve the highest bit error rates. Even when a small number of B steps is used, the tolerable bit error rate increase quite substantially compared to the case where no B step is used. Note that only up to 9 (6) steps are plotted for the single-photon (two-photon) case since sequences with more steps are less optimal. | quant | ph0510025-single1.jpg |
0.435917 | b8f45465dc1a4149b4aeb0d7ea323743 | Renormalization group inspired addressing of pixel positions suited to cast an image into a real ket. Each qudit carries a partial information of the color of a pixel at a different scale. The figure exemplifies the way an image with a total of 4^2 pixels is casted into the state |ψ_2^2× 2^2⟩= ∑_i1,i2=1,… 4 c_i_2,i_1|i_2,i_1⟩ . where pixel values are stored in c_i_2,i_1. | quant | ph0510031-block.jpg |
0.395413 | 33a450e188ef4a4597cd0ed9c9fc09a7 | A schematic representation of the new type of Bell-state Measurement. When two qubit states are sent into a time-bin interferometer the output state is a mixture of photons in two directional modes and three temporal modes. By looking at certain combinations of these photons a Bell-state Measurement can be performed for three different Bell-States | quant | ph0510034-BSMbrunner.jpg |
0.464793 | 9ff88149e2f9404db8a1c4bb10e65e59 | These graphs show the interference fringes found when scanning the interferometer at Bob. we found visibilities of 0.22,0.43 and 0.38 for |ψ_+⟩, |ϕ_+⟩ and |ψ_-⟩. The average visibility of the BSA is V_avg=0.34 (F=0.67). If we subtract the noise (not shown) we find visibilities of 0.32,0.50 and 0.71 for |ψ_+⟩, |ϕ_+⟩ and |ψ_-⟩ which leads to an average of V_avg=0.51 (F=0.76) | quant | ph0510034-Teleport.jpg |
0.537891 | 6fe684a025714e2eb04b605fb6dcf609 | This graph shows two measurements that were taken with a different value of δ. There is a clear shift of the fringe for |ϕ_+⟩ with regards to the other fringes. | quant | ph0510034-TeleportDELTA.jpg |
0.422615 | abde98a4607d4bcabe465a1eb425a35d | A rough overview of the experimental setup. The fiber interferometers shown here are in reality michelson-interferometers, for the interferometer in the BSA two circulators are used to have two separate inputs and outputs. Not shown in the figure is the method used for stabilizing the interferometers. | quant | ph0510034-teleportbrunnerSETUP.jpg |
0.462216 | cd379636c1bc435aa30c9d868694b631 | The probability of detecting 1-distillability as a function of the test number for random states drawn from D× U. For visual purposes only the first 100 tests are depicted and the points have been smoothened out to curves. | quant | ph0510035-probtest.jpg |
0.526408 | 39695083d01e4ffeb3e6e392fe4035cd | The state space of the UU^*VV^*-invariant states. The point C lies in the xz-plane such that the points A, B, C and E lie in the same plane. | quant | ph0510035-threed.jpg |
0.436762 | bb530836bb4e45509a005f594fe1a1e5 | UUVVF-invariant states. All states satisfying ϵ≥ 0 and δ≥ 0 are separable. Shaded areas mark out distillable states (1,2 and ∞- copy distillable). | quant | ph0510035-uuvv.jpg |
0.494964 | 4aeef65bbc0e4355bfbf837e444a7d49 | UU^*VV^*F-invariant states. | quant | ph0510035-uuvvs.jpg |
0.394874 | fdfe0410028f4f58bdd4adfb2f46cc93 | Probability of a random state drawn from D× U to be 1-undistillable. | quant | ph0510035-volall.jpg |
0.498165 | 8ee513add5ae4c309c4a2acd0d4a55f2 | Probability of a random NPT state drawn from D× U to be 1-undistillable. The curve has been drawn to guide the eye. | quant | ph0510035-volnpt.jpg |
0.440179 | c58bb96e81a6433ab7035380c2b5c489 | Regions for r > 2 (white) and r ≤ 2 (black) for fidelity a and pure phase error rate b; grey: no physical states. | quant | ph0510041-figure1.jpg |
0.401102 | bc4b531a9e784d7b9effaeea62919d2f | The circuit of the quantum Fourier transform (QFT) performed on a 4-qubit register. The operator A is the Hadamard gate. The operators B_1, B_2 and B_3 are the controlled-phase gates B_k,m, where m-k=1, 2 and 3, respectively. | quant | ph0510042-fig1.jpg |
0.479824 | 10048131e8a14338b58065482b95010b | The Groverian measure of entanglement for states created during the operation of the QFT on three randomly chosen tensor product states (dashed, dotted and dashed-dotted) as well as on a single random state (solid line). All the states are of nine qubits. | quant | ph0510042-fig2.jpg |
0.431391 | 80ee84b7ce1245469b831fd852045ffc | The Groverian measure of entanglement for states created during the QFT stage of Shor's factoring algorithm. The solid line shows the factorization of N=91 using y=41. The dotted line (with zero entanglement) shows the factorization of N=33 using y=23. The dashed line shows the factorization of N=33 using y=4. | quant | ph0510042-fig3.jpg |
0.500665 | ea8679ebb82d4683a33573e0d9a54e27 | The Groverian measure of entanglement for the states created by the pre-processing stage of Shor's algorithm. Each dot corresponds to a single choice of 2<N≤200 and 1<y<N-1. | quant | ph0510042-fig4.jpg |
0.447364 | feaeecd1e0be4b418e7717e70bcd419a | Level structure of the atoms used in our scheme. The | e ⟩→| r ⟩ transition is driven by a classical laser pulse with coupling Ω, and the | r ⟩→| g ⟩transition is driven by the quantized cavity mode with coupling g. Both the classical laser pulse and the cavity mode are detuned from their respective transitions by the same amount Δ. | quant | ph0510044-fig1.jpg |
0.536629 | a20fd1dc3de34be8a875fe9f311f5daf | The setup is adapted to concentrate two nonmaximally entangled pairs into one maximally entangled. Atoms 1 and 3 are trapped in the optical cavities A and B, respectively. S is a 50/50 beam splitter and _± are single-photon detectors. | quant | ph0510044-fig2.jpg |
0.435631 | a09c53ade6f94a85ada4a222ede0a0e1 | This figure illustrates the localization features of the GQW during the transient regime, by showing the probability that the walker returns close to its initial position after m quasiperiods. As can be readily observed, the number of these quasiperiods before the transient ends increases with p. | quant | ph0510046-figure1.jpg |
0.464494 | cec684feab124d90b0331d33663b62ed | Here we show how changing the value of q influences the behavior of the walker. We have chosen symmetric initial conditions u_n(0)=δ_0,n/√(2) and d_n(0)=iδ_0,n/√(2), the Hadamard coin (ρ=1/2), p=110, and four different values of q. The standard deviation σ(t) against time has exactly q peaks within one quasiperiod. | quant | ph0510046-figure2.jpg |
0.466651 | 1aa17c2a032b4e358310dcdb41488ff5 | The proposed experimental setup for implementing the GQW. See the text for the description of the different components. The upper part represents the staircase voltage that has to be applied to the EOMbis to implement the time-dependent coin, and τ is the cavity roundtrip time. | quant | ph0510046-figure3.jpg |
0.426897 | fcd6681ceffd4ee8906f6be6f4715fcf | A comparison of: (a) an exact numerical evaluation of Eqs. (<ref>,<ref>) with (b), the long-wavelength approximation derived in this section. Both calculations correspond to a value ϕ_0= 2π/150. Only even lattice points have been considered. | quant | ph0510046-figure4.jpg |
0.441954 | 4ad0a1b150d14b9ea228f12b7b2f2a99 | Plots of (n,𝒫_n(t)) and (ξ,𝒫(ξ,τ)) projections for three different time values: t=20, t=70, t=110. | quant | ph0510046-figure5.jpg |
0.475272 | 4b52c97f86fd4134993d062d6e61c09a | A plot of the quadratic deviation σ^2 in position using both the exact distribution 𝒫_n(t) (left) and the continuous distribution 𝒫(ξ,τ) (right), again with ϕ_0= 2π/150. On the right panel, the different curves correspond to w=0.45, w=0.55, w=0.65, w=0.75 and w=0.85. | quant | ph0510046-figure6.jpg |
0.454829 | 63a6d2a67db645b4b33625385fcde62e | When the measurement outcome of a teleportation scheme is the same Bell state as the input state, then Bob's carrier must have been in the state |ψ⟩ before Alice decided to teleport it. This brings the idea of the qubit traveling back in time through the Bell measurement and the Bell pair. The dashed arrowed line represents the time flow in the qubit temporal reference frame; on the second carrier, the qubit time flows against the time of an external observer (t_o) | quant | ph0510048-Fig1.jpg |
0.48934 | 0ebe401f0ba94bad914ae4ee346cabe9 | If a non maximally entangled bipartite state |Π⟩=^1,2|Φ⟩ is measured, some information from the qubit |ψ⟩ can be seen as confined within a time loop caused by the maximally entangled measurement and the entangling gate (dashed loop). Thus, the state of the qubit once it is sent backward in time, _Π|ϕ^*⟩^tr, does not contain all the original information. | quant | ph0510048-Fig10.jpg |
0.450489 | aba4681b37054d8eb1cdf6b568f91a82 | A teleportation based circuit which demonstrates the acausality of entanglement. |Φ⟩ can be any Bell state. If the Bell measurement yields the same state as the input Bell state, then the lowest carrier “knew” beforehand if the NOT-gate (X) had been applied (a=1) or not (a=0). | quant | ph0510048-Fig11.jpg |
0.485176 | a4c6887004fb4bcf9c82520741ed954d | Carbon-labelled trans-crotonic acid and its Hamiltonian parameters. The precession frequencies are given by the diagonal elements and the coupling strengths by the off-diagonal elements. The six hydrogens can be ignored by applying a decoupling sequence and the two oxygens have no spin, so they do not interact with the rest of the molecule. | quant | ph0510048-Fig12.jpg |
0.448616 | 6ccd3ed7e6b24ee8b94177a021d4cd4e | The pulse sequence implemented to illustrate the effect of the circuit depicted in Fig. <ref>. R^θ_i denotes a rotation of angle θ about the axis i. The rotation in grey shade is ignored for the first experiment and applied for the second. The two-carrier gates represent π/2 J-coupling, which is equivalent to a controlled-phase gate. The two-carrier gradient is applied using two identical gradients and a refocusing pulse on C_1 and C_2 in between. The vertical dashed line stresses that we waited for the coupling between C_1 and C_2 to terminate before proceeding to any other action. Note that none of the refocusing pulses are shown in that picture. | quant | ph0510048-Fig13.jpg |
0.487724 | 28fe1d81a90141ed93bc2f0ba520a36e | Consider two carriers prepared in the state |Φ_⟩. If the claim that the entangled measurement invert the qubit's arrow of time is correct, then applying an operation on the carrier corresponding to the qubit evolving against the observer's arrow of time should be equivalent to applying the time-reversed operation ^tr on the other carrier. The same argument applies for entangled measurement in the observer temporal reference frame, that is the incoming qubit 's reference frame is the same as the observer's. | quant | ph0510048-Fig6.jpg |
0.466599 | 555a319ea3c1442a93936993913d1dab | Classification of the entanglement for two–mode Gaussian states in the space of marginal purities μ_1,2 and normalized global purity μ/μ_1μ_2. All physical states lie between the horizontal plane of product states μ=μ_1μ_2, and the upper limiting surface representing GMEMMS. Separable states (dark grey area) and entangled states are well distinguished except for a narrow coexistence region (depicted in black). In the entangled region the average logarithmic negativity (see text) grows from white to medium grey. The expressions of the boundaries between all these regions are collected in entsum. | quant | ph0510052-Table3Dlow.jpg |
0.494217 | 189c7a1466ed4eb39e0af8025e042896 | Dielectric permittivity of Si (line 1) and vitreous _2 (line 2) along the imaginary frequency axis as a function of the logarithm of frequency. | quant | ph0510054-figDD-1.jpg |
0.485702 | 30f54b3b9bb441b1ba5f458c135ae49b | Magnitudes of the thermal corrections to the energy (a) and pressure (b) in configuration of two plates one made of Si and another one of _2 at a separation a=400nm as a function of temperature calculated by the use of different approaches: by the Lifshitz formula and tabulated optical data (solid lines), by the Lifshitz formula and static dielectric permittivities (short-dashed lines), by the asymptotic expressions in Eqs. (<ref>), (<ref>) and (<ref>) (long-dashed lines). | quant | ph0510054-figDD-2.jpg |
0.480689 | b156512835a943e08c3f0408474bbaac | Magnitudes of the thermal corrections to the energy (a) and pressure (b) in configuration of two plates made of vitreous _2 at a separation a=450nm as a function of temperature calculated by the use of different approaches: by the Lifshitz formula and tabulated optical data (solid lines), by the Lifshitz formula and static dielectric permittivities (short-dashed lines), by the asymptotic expressions in Eqs. (<ref>), (<ref>) and (<ref>) (long-dashed lines). | quant | ph0510054-figDD-3.jpg |
0.417791 | d8bedb89719c49868c29295b3e20cdf4 | Magnitudes of the thermal corrections to the energy (a) and pressure (b) in configuration of two plates made of Si at a separation a=300nm as a function of temperature calculated by the use of different approaches: by the Lifshitz formula and tabulated optical data (solid lines), by the Lifshitz formula and static dielectric permittivities (short-dashed lines), by the asymptotic expressions in Eqs. (<ref>), (<ref>) and (<ref>) (long-dashed lines). | quant | ph0510054-figDD-4.jpg |
0.431208 | e4c329a58fab40e1b7fbcacf36525394 | Fidelity for two qubit gate subject to superohmic and ohmic spectral density as a function of T/ Ω for k_1=10^-4 and k_3=10^-2(meV)^-2. Parameters as in Figure <ref> except t_ad=0.8 ns and Ω=0.2 meV. | quant | ph0510056-2qubs.jpg |
0.439517 | c763a78d5f9b43aa9c229e8af7a09d88 | Fidelity ℱ for gate 1 subject to superohmic spectral density as a function of t_ad (T/Ω=8.5 · 10^-3, k_3=10^-1 (meV)^-2 and Ω t_ad=280). The adiabatic time is normalized to 5 ps. Parameters as in Figure <ref> except t_ad. | quant | ph0510056-fid_tad.jpg |
0.418393 | 4bf12c5d437a4cdca9e20c9ceda3db73 | Fidelity ℱ for gate 1 subject to superohmic (dashed line), ohmic (dot line) and both (solid line) spectral densities as a function of T/ Ω. Inset: Fidelity ℱ for superohmic plus ohmic environment as a function of t_ad with Ω t_ad=280 (k_1= 4· 10^-4 and k_3=10^-1(meV)^-2). Parameters as in Figure <ref>. | quant | ph0510056-ohmic.jpg |
0.475186 | 8e83528c61014fc6a5b9e2bff64ab5ed | Fidelity ℱ for gate 1 as a function of temperature for different k_3 (expressed in (meV)^-2) in the presence of a superohmic environment. The points are the computer simulation results and the curves have the form ℱ=1-∑_j=±η_j Γ^j t_ad (η_-=3 · 10^-2 and η_+= 0.7). Inset: Fidelity ℱ as a function of k_3 for two different temperatures (T_1/Ω=1.6 · 10^-2 and T_2/Ω=5 · 10^-3). Parameters: ϵ=1 eV, Ω=25 meV, t_ad=7.5 ps and ω_c=0.5 meV. | quant | ph0510056-sfa_fig1.jpg |
0.410732 | b23e88471d1c4af4a8a1fc5f6761739a | Schematics of the experimental setup used in <cit.> | quant | ph0510060-dn_new.jpg |
0.481713 | 20800f0c2b5f4bc7a84446b921f998b6 | Simplified energy-level scheme of Ba^+. | quant | ph0510060-levels.jpg |
0.505203 | bd9606a825fc43579bb1b0a42330e733 | Amplification of single quantum jumps by the fluorescence of S_1/2⟷ P_1/2. The 203 onset times t^i_0 (three shown) of dark fluorescence are the preparation times of single “D_5/2”–quantum systems. The ensemble {t^i_0} is the preparation time t_0=0 of the decaying quantum state |5 D_5/2^ -⟩ which represents this ensemble of “D_5/2”–quantum systems. Usually the quantum mechanical ensemble is thought of as a large number of micro-objects at one and the same time. Here, the quantum mechanical ensemble is one and the same micro object prepared at a large number of times t_0^i, which is the same time t=0 of the state |5 D_5/2^ -⟩ describing the ensemble (this figure is taken from Ref. <cit.>.) | quant | ph0510060-nag_deh.jpg |
0.480164 | 6656c8e0a066439cb9b32455336c0c2c | (Color online). Histogram of arrival times using a bright synchronization pulse. The dots are the measured arrival time and the solid line is the fit to the data discussed in the text. | quant | ph0510062-rosenberg_fig1.jpg |
0.412645 | 116f7512b35a4afd9f394a06819542dc | Dependence of sifted bit error rate and sifted key rate on the width of the timing window for data using optical synchronization. | quant | ph0510062-rosenberg_fig2.jpg |
0.403352 | 6b286f1c26594aca90e633cbabd1a626 | Sifted key rate (a) and error rate (b) as a function of mean photon number for 50 km of fiber. | quant | ph0510062-rosenberg_fig3.jpg |
0.55242 | 99e44cce67ae4413915efe8e1ecca535 | Schematic diagram of Grover's quantum search algorithm over a space of n qubits (N=2^n entries). Initially, all qubits are prepared in the state |000...0⟩. (a) A global Hadamard gate prepares an equal superposition of all states. (b) The oracle (shaded in yellow) flips the sign of the amplitude corresponding to the marked element, represented by the n-bit binary number x. (c) Two global Hadamard gates surround an additional phase gate (shaded in red) that flips the sign of the amplitude corresponding to the initial state |000...0⟩, amplifying the weight of the marked state. Steps (b) and (c) are repeated in sequence a prescribed number of times, and finally (d) the qubits are measured. An example of the distributions of quantum amplitudes at each stage are depicted at the right. | quant | ph0510066-fig1.jpg |
0.443106 | a4cda2abe50048cf9e701a39bee55e98 | Quantum circuit to implement Grover's searching algorithm for N=4 entries <cit.>. (a.) Theoretical circuit using a third ancilla bit and standard gates including the Haddamard gate (H), the generalized Toffoli gate, a bit flip,X, and a controlled-NOT gate. The Toffoli gate implements the oracle (shaded in yellow), where the scheme to mark each of the four possibilities is shown below the circuit. The remainder of the circuit (shaded in red) amplifies the weighting of the marked state. (b.) The experimental circuit to implement the algorithm for n=2 qubits, where R(θ,ϕ) is a rotation on the Bloch sphere <cit.>, R_z(ϕ) is a phase rotation about the ẑ-axis, and G_MS is the Mølmer-Sørensen entangling gate. The yellow shaded box identifies the oracle, where the value of the variables α and β (given in the table), determine which state is marked <cit.>. The remainder of the circuit (shaded in red) amplifies the weighting of the marked state. | quant | ph0510066-fig2.jpg |
0.373578 | 8319bdc4d0f043e1992cd56d7617e497 | (a.) Output of the algorithm. The conditional probability of measuring each of four output states given one was marked is shown in sequence from top to bottom |00⟩, |01⟩, |10⟩, |11⟩. Each of the four data sets shows the distribution of measurements averaged over 500 trials. The marked state was recovered on average with 60(2)%, compared to unit probability for the ideal quantum algorithm and 50% for the best possible classical algorithm. (b.) Output of the algorithm without the final entangling gate. This shows that the fidelity of the oracle is about 80%. Each of the four data sets was also averaged over 500 trials. The experimental average to recover the marked state is 41(2)% with the theoretical limit of 50%, both of which are less than the 60% from (a). The quoted errors are statistical. | quant | ph0510066-fig3.jpg |
0.458688 | 48b976a8ee9b4130a913a12b0a303e3f | A private state with purifying system E. The “key part” (AB) after a complete von Neumann measurement gives an ideal key, which is secure due to the fact that Alice and Bob hold the “shield” part (A'B'). | quant | ph0510067-privatestate03.jpg |
0.404389 | cb17417296654aaaa6fdfe987df26842 | Regions of ground states with different r. The different shadow regions correspond to different ground states. For example, the darkest region denotes the system ground state as |1̅⟩ ect. The lowest curve is κ_1̅=√(1+r/2) obtained by solving E_0=-1. | quant | ph0510071-1.jpg |
0.459684 | 6dff381a832d4ac3a9f7f6a30d2094ab | The concurrence with r=1. Different shading regions correspond to different GSI. The maximum of entanglement appears in the interval [κ_1̅,κ_0]. However, for other GSI regions, the concurrence are strongly suppressed. | quant | ph0510071-2.jpg |
0.433934 | 3416918db778410586710a8b99e1645c | The eigenenergy of λ=-1,0,1,2,3 for r=1. (a) κ_b=0.4; (b) κ_a=0.4; (c) κ_b=1.1; (d) κ_b=1.8. The black arrows in (c) and (d) indicate the eigenstate with λ=0 and λ=1 respectively. | quant | ph0510071-3.jpg |
0.482151 | df3291f422594fbd9a46825849ec69c5 | a) Experimental setup for QKD. The PBS and HWP are used for polarization measurements. b) Lens system for momentum measurements. See text. c) Lens system for position measurements. See text. | quant | ph0510087-fig1.jpg |
0.599553 | 14d965c991074eef92692f36f4b31ef0 | a) Experimental results showing correlations in a) momentum-momentum measurements and b) position-position measurements. Also shown is a diagram of each measurement scheme (see text). | quant | ph0510087-fig2.jpg |
0.468232 | 694f385c76bc44a3804f079f04529da7 | Experimental results for position-momentum measurements. Also shown is a diagram of the measurement scheme (see text). | quant | ph0510087-fig3.jpg |
0.496301 | 30eefe3b18d04917a870770c397dd5ab | Polarization correlation measurements for a) momentum measurements: A_p1B_p1 (red bars) and A_p2B_p2 (grey bars) and b) position measurements A_x1B_x1 (red bars) and A_x2B_x2 (grey bars). The insets show the polarization interference curves. | quant | ph0510087-fig4.jpg |
0.432901 | affce6cf87be4e889d9ce47cdd60d3f3 | a) Polarization correlation measurements for a) position-momentum measurements A_x1B_p1 (red bars) and A_x1B_p2 (grey bars), and b) position-momentum measurements A_x2B_p1 (red bars) and A_x2B_p2 (grey bars). The insets show the polarization interference curves. | quant | ph0510087-fig5.jpg |
0.4892 | 2f6d0893586b42e0afefa06d03f874bb | Illustration of QKD using imaging (I) and Fourier (F) optical systems. | quant | ph0510088-fig1.jpg |
0.515737 | 60c034e301b54358b3c05e10122f5e38 | Experimental setup. | quant | ph0510088-fig2.jpg |
0.479968 | 085382ad4ae242cb977598d90fa1b28c | Intensity distributions at Bob's detection plane for the four lens configurations II, IF, FI and FF for the case when Alice sends the character “7". Here lighter squares correspond to a larger number of photo-counts. | quant | ph0510088-fig3.jpg |
0.468737 | 11c6f61b7dbb4cdbbe860d249311f941 | Normalized counts for Bob's Fourier (F) detection system when Alice uses Fourier (left) and Image (right) encoding. | quant | ph0510088-fig4.jpg |
0.420431 | cae86279acdf4f6aa056dc0adb756260 | Normalized counts for Bob's Image (I) detection system when Alice uses Image (left) and Fourier (right) encoding. | quant | ph0510088-fig5.jpg |
0.447364 | 56a7835174ec49ec993c933e526ad7c1 | Atom level structure in our scheme. The |e⟩→|r⟩ transition is driven by a classical laser pulse with coupling Ω, and the |r⟩→|g⟩ transition is driven by the quantized cavity mode with coupling g. Both the classical laser pulse and the cavity mode are detuned from their respective transition frequencies by a same amount Δ. | quant | ph0510093-fig1.jpg |
0.443269 | f7c90e4f77094d51be9e57cedb887eff | The setup is adapted to implement the secure QDC scheme. Atoms 1, 2 and 3 are initially prepared in tripartite entangled state. Label the cavity of Alice and Bob as A and B, respectively, and they were both initially prepared in the vacuum state. The 50/50 beam splitter (BS) and single-photon detectors _± are located in Bob's side. | quant | ph0510093-fig2.jpg |
0.527246 | 6a89f24ec4ae45c0a1e0ad2f8a0dfacb | Pictorial representation of nonsignaling correlations P(a,b|x,y) for binary inputs and outputs. The thick lines define one of the facets of the polytope of local models, or local polytope, corresponding to the CHSH inequality. All the extreme points lying on this facet are also extreme points of the more general polytope of nonsignaling correlations. Only one extremal point is on top of the CHSH facet, given by the nonlocal machine. The curved line schematically represents the region of points achievable using quantum states. Isotropic correlations (<ref>) lie along the vertical line starting from the nonlocal machine and entering the local polytope through the center of the CHSH facet. In the optimal eavesdropping attack, Eve simulates Alice and Bob's correlation, square point, by the proper combination of extreme points of the general polytope, circles in the figure. | quant | ph0510094-attack.jpg |
0.466893 | 1859b6bf3a5345d08714d7631de347fa | Key rates using one-way communication against nonsignaling individual attacks. The dashed line corresponds to the situation where no pre-processing is employed, while the thick one to the optimal pre-processing. In the inset, the key rate against a standard quantum eavesdropper is given, compared to BB84 (dashed line). | quant | ph0510094-nsrates.jpg |
0.432733 | 13f7ac8ff0eb41a694e39d90422ad792 | two equivalent views of the protocol. Subsequent random Clifford operations (C_1, C_2, C_3) performed only on non-measured copies, each followed by the measurement of a single copy are equivalent to performing just one random Clifford operation (C) and the same measurements. | quant | ph0510096-eqviews.jpg |
0.491667 | 401419c51c214b7aa2c3c99d6679ef3e | in the first step, local Clifford operations (local with respect to the parties) result in statistically dependent copies. In the second step, some of the copies are measured, providing information on the global state. Afterwards, the measured copies are separable. | quant | ph0510096-protocol.jpg |
0.497178 | dffdf344a37042b587963c3635117731 | comparison of different protocols for the given cat state example. The dotted line gives the yield of the protocol of Ref. <cit.>, the dashed line of that of Ref. <cit.> and the solid line of our protocol, as a function of the fidelity F of the depolarizing channels. | quant | ph0510096-yield.jpg |
0.511455 | 519c6d2b244e44738c6d0381e569c74e | (a) Diagram of a minimal disturbance measurement (MDM) performed on a single qubit in the state | ϕ⟩. The device provides an output state ρ _F with fidelity F and a ”classical guess” G. (b) Realization of a MDM by the projector { E_i}, the measurement of the probe qubit, and the classical feed-forward σ _Z. | quant | ph0510097-MDMFig1.jpg |
0.526734 | 5d626f1c6359431bb0d0a1d038b469a1 | Optical set-up implementing the MDM. The output is characterized adopting the analysis setup illustrated in the dashed box. | quant | ph0510097-MDMFig2.jpg |
0.469999 | aabd9d2599af4ee0b2c762ff897a4489 | (a) Experimental data of the quantum fidelity F versus the classical guess G for an arbitrary input qubit. The fidelities have been averaged over the six states {| H⟩ ,| V⟩ ,| L_±⟩ ,| C_±⟩}; solid line: optimal trade-off between F_univ and G_univ (Eq.1); (b) Experimental data of the quantum fidelity F versus the classical guess G for an equatorial input qubit. The fidelities have been averaged over the four states {| H⟩ ,| V⟩ ,| L_±⟩}; solid line: optimal trade-off between F_cov and G_cov (Eq.2). | quant | ph0510097-MDMFig3.jpg |
0.466365 | 7e75ff5ce983463cae0e6004a74a4dd3 | Bifurcation and creation of a “snake”–type closed orbit in the first caustic surface (k=1). The figure displays a family of graphs of the function t(ρ) with increasing values of η (bottom to top): For η≤η_ crit^1, t(ρ) has its minimum on the symmetry axis at the top of the caustic, t(0)=η/2 (case 2c), and ρ(t) grows monotonically in 0 ≤ρ < 1 (bottom curves, η = 2, 2.17, corresponding to the late variant [Sl] of the “teardrop” caustic. See also Fig. <ref>.) The behavior changes at the critical value η_ crit^1 = 2.33112... (bottom heavy curve): For η > η_ crit^1, ρ=0 is a local maximum of t(ρ), while the minimum t = t_ min^(1) (case 2d) is now attained off-axis. We are at the intermediate-time variant [Si] of the “teardrop” (η = 2.50, 2.67, 2.83, 3). The extrema of t(ρ) are located on the dashed green curve (“pitchfork bifurcation”). — At η=π (top heavy curve), the first snake orbit with time of flight t = π/2 (dashed purple line) detaches from the symmetry axis <cit.>, and we enter the early regime [Se] of the caustic (η = 3.33, 3.5, top curves). — Red and blue segments represent the (+) and (-) solution in Eq. (<ref>), respectively. Symbols indicate irregular points of the parametrization: Half-integer orbits (, cases 2a, 2b), the top of the caustic (⋆, case 2c), the minimal time t_ min^(1) (, case 2d), the bifurcation point (▽, case 3b), and creation of a closed orbit (△, case 3c). | quant | ph0510100-bifurcation.jpg |
0.462469 | caec3cc09edf411f94b3c8c39e7f15a4 | Cusps and cones in caustic surfaces near the irregular point (ρ_0 = 0, z_0 = -π/2). In the umbilic case t_0 = π and η=2π, a pair of surfaces asymptotically coalesces into a double cone of opening angle 45^∘ (“early” caustic δ t < 0, green line; “late” caustic δ t > 0, blue curve). In contrast, for t_0 = 2π the generic value η = 8π/3 leads to a cylindrical cusp <cit.> (red dotted curve, δ t > 0). A log-log plot of δ z versus δρ (inset) illustrates the different power laws δρ∼δ z and δρ^2 ∼ C(η)δ z^3 guiding these surfaces, respectively. | quant | ph0510100-conecusp.jpg |
0.500555 | 1936648c340f4af887b640cd1eafb7b6 | An algorithm detailing the existence of real solutions in Eq. (<ref>). | quant | ph0510100-flowchart.jpg |
0.491332 | 7e6f4f814eda4113933c815a30bcba0d | Motion of electrons emitted from a fixed energy, isotropic point source at the origin into parallel fields. (Parameters used: E = 10^-4eV, E = 15V/m, B = 0.02T, corresponding to a force parameter η = v_0 B / E = 7.908 (<ref>). All dimensions are in μm.) The classical trajectory field (top left panel, blue curves) traces out an intersecting set of caustic surfaces (red curves) that separate regions with different numbers of classical paths connecting the source to a given destination point. The maximum number (here, eight) occurs in the diamond-shaped entities along the symmetry axis. The trajectory field contains two closed orbits that return to the source <cit.>, a “snake” orbit (green), and a “balloon” orbit (purple). — The center panel depicts the density profile of the electrons in primitive semiclassical approximation (blue plot), superimposed onto the caustic surfaces (red) and the closed orbits. The caustics clearly delineate the features of the density distribution, and the interference pattern shows approximate symmetry with respect to the closed “snake” orbit. (The letter combinations (green) refer to the classification of the caustics in Section <ref>.) — The quantum density profile is displayed in the top right panel. Its agreement with the semiclassical result (center panel) is remarkable. — Bottom row: Profiles of the radially integrated electronic density distribution n(ρ̂) at a distance ẑ = 30 μm from the source (indicated by purple arrows above) for a normalized flux of one electron per second, in units of m^-2. The green curve in the left panel denotes the purely classical cross section. It is strongly modified by semiclassical interference (center panel). Both classical and semiclassical density profiles diverge at the positions of the caustics (marked by red arrows). Otherwise, the semiclassical density profile quantitatively matches the quantum result (blue curve, right panel). | quant | ph0510100-introduction.jpg |
0.479935 | 40636d5752b046bc9f27d26ea340f5e5 | Graphical solution for the number of trajectories from source to detector. The heavy (red) curve is ϵ_(T), Eq. (<ref>). Its intersections with the line ϵ = 1 define T_- and T_+ (circles), the times of flight of electrons respectively emitted in the direction, and against the direction, of the electric force. The light (black) curves trace ϵ(T), Eq. (<ref>). Each goes to infinity at T = kπ, i.e., whenever a cyclotron orbit is complete. Every intersection of these curves with ϵ = 1 (crosses) represents the time of flight of a trajectory from the source to the specified point 𝐫 on the detector. There are at most two solutions within each cyclotron period (k-1)π < T < kπ. (In this graph, η=11, z = 3, and ρ = 0.3.) | quant | ph0510100-solve.jpg |
0.506603 | e61d8d6c81b94a4cba3e2d99779953f3 | Multiarm structure for N_A=4, M_ in=8 and M_ out=5. Arrows indicates how to group oscillators in the same position n of each branch to apply DFT basis change (<ref>). | quant | ph0510105-multiarm.jpg |
0.435789 | b03309de25da42ec87d85e2e9efcdb09 | Here we plot P_no error, the probability that an approximate qubit state has shifts in both x- and p-quadratures less than √(π)/6 as a function of Δ=k. This shows the case of |0̃⟩, but the |1̃⟩ plot is indistinguishable. | quant | ph0510107-PnoerrorGKP.jpg |
0.411795 | 9d4b099614a94837a05b224bce75b975 | P(u,v) the probability density that the |1̃⟩ approximate qubit state contains errors u (in its x-quadrature) and v (in its p-quadrature). Here we have used Δ=k=1/4. | quant | ph0510107-Puvone.jpg |
0.415985 | f0c8392508124522b684eb012f17e65c | P(u,v) the probability density that the |0̃⟩ approximate qubit state contains errors u (in its x-quadrature) and v (in its p-quadrature). Here we have used Δ=k=1/4. | quant | ph0510107-Puvzero.jpg |
0.42004 | 67a6819f99b74cbe861fcc7604e60665 | Procedure to correct p shifts acting on the qubit. The circuit shows errors acting on the qubit and ancilla. Then the qubit and ancilla modes meet in a beam splitter, mode 1 is squeezed, the p-quadrature of mode 2 is measured, and a correcting shift of s(p_2) is applied to the qubit. | quant | ph0510107-correcting_p.jpg |
0.434962 | 3d197b9d742d413f959dd4e44425e601 | Procedure to correct x shifts acting on the qubit. The circuit shows errors acting on the qubit and ancilla. Then the qubit and ancilla modes meet in a beam splitter, mode 1 is squeezed, the x-quadrature of mode 2 is measured, and a correcting shift of s(x_2) is applied to the qubit. | quant | ph0510107-correcting_x.jpg |
0.40889 | c42bbb6539764bab914b62765a9f17ff | Here we plot the mean number of photons contained in an approximate qubit state as a function of the probability that such a state has a shift error larger than √(π)/6. | quant | ph0510107-nvsPerror.jpg |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.