dedup-isc-ft-v107-score
float64
0.32
1
uid
stringlengths
32
32
text
stringlengths
0
32.5k
paper_id
stringlengths
1
14
original_image_filename
stringlengths
5
222
0.444879
da621d8fc27147d4b6837095492c667c
Performance of the the wavelet filter on the signal.
2012.13448
filtering_onlywavelet.jpg
0.481235
24373bc2c69949bb883cd57cfcd38f9b
The power of the first pilot subcarrier and the number of vehicles on the road.
2012.13448
freq_response.jpg
0.494997
5bcb7635466a44ad9cf91c1a1986ae29
The methodology that integrates the simulators.
2012.13448
meth_wo.jpg
0.429147
0bca43371f09421dbd50d7aff76e0f17
The vehicle collected SPaT messages 200 meters away from the roadside unit.
2012.13448
moving.jpg
0.401058
002cdcf2c95641c996a352a36878b740
The vehicle collected SPaT messages 200 meters away from the roadside unit.
2012.13448
moving.jpg
0.490785
c9c109ab747d4a9c9bf789919d785ffe
Original and outlier filtered signals.
2012.13448
outlier.jpg
0.475783
16da6dfe1d654d0cad069bac1ed7f05e
Problem model.
2012.13448
problem_woSpeed.jpg
0.426916
0ef33da3d2444cc0addfdb4abde3a1ef
2012.13448
roc.jpg
0.382192
07852097af3e4f258b0dfa6851b0e684
A typical communication scenario in a vehicular network.
2012.13448
traffic_figure.jpg
0.506072
e80da1835f80426f8b54f2a94ea6d82b
The 12 AOIs in the cockpit
2012.13449
AOI_car.jpg
0.409453
d12b609e1c9945178781751b81211bc5
Confusion matrix for fusion of all three modalities for the 12 classes
2012.13449
Confusion_Matrix12.jpg
0.406678
dd7463951087428d844d16966df48588
Confusion matrix for fusion of all three modalities for the 7 classes
2012.13449
Confusion_Matrix7.jpg
0.400935
67c57c06dd6c4f04b0f506e185e8f2c8
Confusion matrix for fusion of all three modalities for the 9 classes
2012.13449
Confusion_Matrix9.jpg
0.537412
5336836e48684336be4a3d55800dbefa
A multimodal late fusion architecture
2012.13449
Methodology.jpg
0.43159
ad8830aa21a74b07b5deea0573f3003b
Driver makes a pointing gesture to interact with the car. Image courtesy of <cit.>
2012.13449
bmw-natural-inteaction.jpg
0.406444
24fc7e7b31204866bd2bfc7d40762488
Driver points to AOI 5 (multimedia) in the car. The face is blurred due to the privacy policy.
2012.13449
driver_pointing.jpg
0.415467
7d57c580c13444f28582878fabe66cc4
Model performance on the individual drivers
2012.13449
driver_test.jpg
0.439806
83d226780e9847b795d3b776d8b86cec
Change of origin from centre of front axle of the car (left) to the centre of the driver's seat (right)
2012.13449
origin.jpg
0.454898
ee93230af5bc43ca91fed117d7f9d997
The modalities used: gaze and finger ray-cast (left) and head pose (right)
2012.13449
ray_casting.jpg
0.400081
f1fb3a7e14bc49618b5c722ef6330899
3D scatter plot of the measured AOI points.
2012.13449
scatter_AOI.jpg
0.416904
a6e3e5f1c49848c2af1693ecac397b25
Circuit diagram of the gradual evolution of the circuit architecture optimization the transverse field Ising Hamiltonian, (Left) after 10 generations and (Right) after 150 generations. The notation R_i with i ∈{x,y,z, xx, yy, zz} represents a rotation gate wrt to axis i (for the purpose of clarity the explicit rotation's angles are omitted). Note that gates spanning multiple qubits are only applied to the upper- and lowermost qubit. Note that by generation 150 some previously present gates with redundant parameters are removed. Moreover, the circuit generally reflects intelligence in its design and indeed is nicely aligned the expected useful set of gates for the TFI problem.
2012.13453
circuit.jpg
0.484043
5f34810e170e4ec894114bfa69ff60db
(Left) Outline of evolutionary circuit discovery: Starting with a random initial parent with known loss value, we create copies and mutate them using our custom mutation strategy using operations for instance as shown on the right. The offspring population is then evaluated on the quantum machine. The circuit with lowest loss value (the original parent included) becomes the parent circuit of the next generation. This procedure is repeated until an appropriate convergence criterion is satisfied. (Right) Mutation performs one of 4 actions with certain probabilities, we show these on the right. INSERT: Add random gate at random position; DELETE: Delete gate at random position; SWAP: Replace gate at random position with random new gate; MODIFY: Change parameter of gate at random position.
2012.13453
figure_1.jpg
0.428981
08ceddbeaec742ed94b04d39ab08189a
A human providing demonstrations to the robot for a manipulation task through kinesthetic teaching.
2012.13457
2.jpg
0.479889
46595a3dce374ba4be07cd0362f335bc
Top: Structure of the network defining a single map ψ_m in the diffeomorphism chain <cit.>. Bottom: Structure of the network for defining latent subtask metric __k <cit.>.
2012.13457
network_new.jpg
0.351195
47519018e62a4b73916ff850fa86a670
A transform tree with root in the configuration space alongside hand-specified subtask/leaf nodes (grey) and learned subtask nodes (blue). Each learned subtask node is linked to a latent subtask node (green) under a chained map ψ__k→_k = ψ_1∘…∘ψ_M.
2012.13457
tree_new.jpg
0.451678
3e710650d5a74ac393b9bda68ef9ad6b
Experimental set-up, photonic dispersion, and optical bistability. (A) Illustration of our experiment, involving an oil-filled optical cavity driven by a continuous wave laser. The cavity length is controlled with a piezoelectric actuator holding one of the mirrors. The transmitted power is time-resolved with a photodetector, or measured in position and momentum space with cameras. (B) White light transmission measurements of our oil-filled cavity. The measured dispersion relation is fitted by a parabola, indicating the cavity photons behave as free particles with an effective mass m^∗= 2.064 × 10^-35 kg. (C) Transmitted power measured at k_∥=0 when ramping the laser power up and down, evidencing optical bistability due to effective photon-photon interactions.
2012.13463
fig1.jpg
0.380152
cf185c04a3594a03bc6996d75aefbb08
Superfluid photons above a critical density. Experimental transmitted intensity as a function of position in (A) and (B), and momentum in (D) and (E), for a laser power indicated in each panel. (C) Cuts along the flow axis passing through the center of the laser spot and the center of the defect in (A) and (B). The peaks observed at 20 mW but not at 340 mW are the result of scattering from the defect, which interferes with the incident flow and generates spatial fringes. (F) Cuts along k_y=0 in (D) and (E). The peaks observed at 20 mW inside the solid-line ellipse in (D), and in the shaded region in (F), evidence backscattering from the defect; these peaks disappear at 340 mW. (G to L) Numerical calculations as described in Methods, for two different laser amplitudes F referenced to the cavity loss rate γ. F/γ is such that fluid density is well-below and well-above the threshold for bistability in (G) and (J), and (H) and (K), respectively. Consequently, interference fringes are present in (G) but not in (H), and backscattering states inside the solid-line ellipse are present in (J) but not in (K). As for the experimental data, the cuts in (I) are taken along the flow axis passing through the center of the laser spot and the center of the defect in (G) and (H), and the cuts in (L) are taken along k_y=0 in (J) and (K). Scale bars indicate 5 μm. Solid dot in (A) corresponds to the position of 0 μm in (C). Dashed circles in (A, B) indicate approximate location of defect. Dashed circles in (G, H) indicate the location of the defect in simulations. The cuts in (C, I) are integrated vertically over the laser spot size and in (F, L) over Δ k_y=0.06 μm^-1. In (C) data has been normalized to intensity at 0 μm. In (F, L) data for both powers has been normalized to the intensity at the peak of the incident momentum. Solid and dashed lines in (C, F, I, L) correspond to low and high power, respectively.
2012.13463
fig2.jpg
0.46461
a44339e6f39848bba9e0480d25b0ce24
From transient scattering to steady-state superfluidity. (A and B) Time-dependent photon density N along the flow axis passing through the center of the laser spot and the center of the defect. The thermal relaxation rate Γ_T is 1.5 ns^-1 in (A) and 0.015 ns^-1 in (B). Consequently, a steady state is reached much faster in (A) than in (B). (C and D) Two-dimensional plots of N at t=0.2 ns, indicated by the dashed lines in (A) and (B). After this time, the system has reached steady state for Γ_T=1.5 ns^-1 but not for Γ_T=0.015 ns^-1. Consequently, (C) displays the absence of interference fringes characteristic of superfluidity, while in (D) interference fringes are visible. (E) Time-dependent blueshift of excitation spectrum for Γ_T=0.015 ns^-1. (F) Spectrum of excitations at times indicated by corresponding circles in (E).
2012.13463
fig3.jpg
0.399001
63a0066f742a48e3add8cab46d27678f
Superfluidity of photons below a critical velocity. Experimental transmitted intensity as a function of position in (A and B), and momentum in (C and D), for slightly different cavity lengths corresponding to a 4% change in the magnitude of the flow velocity |v|. The laser power is 360 mW for all measurements. Scale bars in (A) and (B) correspond to 5 μm. (E) Cuts along the flow axis passing through the center of the laser spot and the center of the defect in (A) and (B) as solid and dashed lines, respectively. The peaks observed for the larger |v| (solid line) are due to scattering from the defect, which interferes with the incident flow and modulates the density. (F) Cuts along k_y=0 in (C) and (D) as solid and dashed lines, respectively. The peaks observed for the larger |v| (solid line) inside the shaded region, which correspond to the peaks observed inside the solid-line ellipse in (C), evidence backscattering from the defect; these peaks disappear for the smaller |v|. Red vertical lines in (F) indicate the main incident wavevector, which changes only slightly in the viscous-to-superfluid transition. Solid dot in (A) corresponds to x=0 μm in (C). Dashed circles in (A, B) indicate approximate location of defect. The cuts in (E) are integrated vertically over the width of the laser spot and in (F) over Δ k_y=0.17 μm^-1. In (E) the data for both velocities has been normalized to the intensity at x=0 μm, and in (F) to the intensity at the peak of the incident momentum of the solid-line cut.
2012.13463
fig4.jpg
0.464537
77974d8840a04d32818eb0b94568558f
Embedding diagram of the WH in three-dimensional Euclidean space for different constant values of y with a=0.1 and L=5. Here, z and ρ are the usual cylindrical coordinates.
2012.13465
geoCC.jpg
0.45143
9c16038b8724428b807b3bd7d8912a1f
Cross section of the singularity σ' in the plane u_1-u_3 for different values of a/L^2, for simplicity we have made L=1. Here, u_3 is the symmetry axis. In the right panel we show a particular case where a=0.1, and hence a/L^2≪1.
2012.13465
singularidad.jpg
0.439245
601070a0dd194e08bbc73c518fd295f7
Illustration of the different configurations of the GRA module. (a) Mode 1. (b) Mode 2. (c) Mode 3.
2012.13466
FigX_GRA_configuration.jpg
0.396676
38fe20c27ef54c6ca547904b58cbd792
Top view of the ISPRS benchmark dataset colored by elevations. (a) Training and (b) test areas. It should be noted that the scales of two color bars are different.
2012.13466
FigX_ISPRS_Benchmark.jpg
0.413018
29eb6ec807174519a4202e3444db3559
Classification results of test area 1 of the ISPRS benchmark dataset. (a) Ground truth. (b) PointNet. (c) PointNet++. (d) HDA-PointNet++. (e) PointSIFT. (f) Ours.
2012.13466
FigX_ISPRS_Results1.jpg
0.472131
e0a5515925eb4deda6be17ad6cf685c4
Classification results of test area 2 of the ISPRS benchmark dataset. (a) Ground truth. (b) PointNet. (c) PointNet++. (d) HDA-PointNet++. (e) PointSIFT. (f) Ours.
2012.13466
FigX_ISPRS_Results2.jpg
0.418374
08230eeddd034ae2aad01d0d2a34dc5f
Details of classification results of the ISPRS benchmark dataset. (a) Ground truth. (b) PointNet. (c) PointNet++. (d) HDA-PointNet++. (e) PointSIFT. (f) Ours.
2012.13466
FigX_ISPRS_Results_Details.jpg
0.466887
b4e20c91c7a3498f89020c501442fed1
The error map of the classification results of the ISPRS benchmark dataset using our method.
2012.13466
FigX_ISPRS_Results_ErrorMap.jpg
0.386414
8c3e9fa8fd27434fb40f108d3fc386d4
Classification results using different conjurations of the GRA module. (a) Ground truth, (b) Non GRA. (c) Only SRA. (d) Only CRA. (e) Mode 1. (f) Model 2. (g) Mode 3.
2012.13466
FigX_ISPRS_Results_GRA.jpg
0.402605
90938d7c97c24184a63c05a33c577740
Classification results using different local spatial encoding methods. (a) Ground truth, (b) Model A. (c) Model B. (d) Model C. (e) Model D. (f) Model E.
2012.13466
FigX_ISPRS_Results_LoSDA.jpg
0.428154
a5e0393cde344dafba392c0fa7985642
Illustration of the data division of the ISPRS benchmark dataset. (a) The division of the large training blocks. (b) The further subdivision of each training block.
2012.13466
FigX_ISPRS_benchmark_split.jpg
0.397921
76753490807846429d690298641a2605
Difference between (a) MLS and (b) ALS point clouds of a same street scene. (c) Different points distribution of two point clouds.
2012.13466
FigX_Illustration.jpg
0.448573
6b3d594f063b4b8a8cbdaabf1f128414
Top view of the LASDU dataset colored by elevations. (a) Training and (b) test areas. It should be noted that the scales of two color bars are different.
2012.13466
FigX_LASDU_Benchmark.jpg
0.462434
eacdfaec3f6f46ec84e48895453f43f3
Classification results using the LASDU dataset with different semantic labeling methods. (a) Ground truth, (b) PointNet. (c) PointNet++. (d) HDA-PointNet++. (e) PointSIFT. (f) Ours.
2012.13466
FigX_LASDU_Results1.jpg
0.37918
a618a6ecaf8d4274a8fe15fd9484af20
Details of classification results using the LASDU dataset. (a) Ground truth. (b) PointNet. (c) PointNet++. (d) HDA-PointNet++. (e) PointSIFT. (f) Ours.
2012.13466
FigX_LASDU_Results_Details.jpg
0.405256
2c77b2f0ee7945a09dedc42f6504baa6
Detailed network architecture.
2012.13466
FigX_Method_DetailedArchitecture.jpg
0.421091
e7053aa81ba8495fb3f82e4a78e4bc0b
Illustration of the GRA module. (a) is the SRA module. (b) is the CRA module.
2012.13466
FigX_Method_GRAModules.jpg
0.433776
557a5bed9e544c4b929bc22c6b066871
Illustration of the multi-scale network framework.
2012.13466
FigX_Method_GraNetStructure.jpg
0.511199
80ffc358c5334c9e9f38243a71e78b5d
Exploited local spatial attention encoding module.
2012.13466
FigX_Method_LoSDEModule.jpg
0.418499
854095a154e14f14bd2fe4b64b0dca16
(a) Schematic diagram of a subretinal implant in the eye. (b) Monopolar stimulation with 0.5 of current at each electrode. (c) Bipolar stimulation with 0.5 at the center electrode, and -0.25 at each of the side electrodes. (d) Virtual electrode created at the center-right by -0.5, 0.3 and 0.2 at the left, center and right electrode, respectively. (b)-(d) are synthesized by linear combination of the three elementary electric fields.
2012.13467
Figure1.jpg
0.406664
d0006e58020045dba0ee634dd9890401
Lateral confinement of the electric field at three stimulation depths. Top: potential difference between 45 and 80 from the implant; Middle: 25 to 60; Bottom: 5 to 40.
2012.13467
Figure2.jpg
0.478078
8834c150ffd8490ca271019e93c851ba
Structures of protonated and deprotonated water clusters. Five protonated water clusters H_3O^+(H_2O)_n (n = 1–3, and 6) and seven deprotonated water clusters OH^- (H_2O)_n (n = 1–6) are taken from Ref.. The red and white spheres respectively indicate oxygen and hydrogen atoms. The dashed lines represent hydrogen-bonds.
2012.13469
fig-1.jpg
0.478453
1a0c8c18408c400198d4818f5bd1200a
Structures of the studied (a) water–halide clusters and (b) water–alkali clusters. Oxygen and hydrogen are represented by red and white spheres. The anions and cations are marked by other colors. Dashed lines represent hydrogen-bonding.
2012.13469
fig-2.jpg
0.447727
c0d69b9e51e44df1bbb642e3ccfed176
(a) The basis-set dependence of the total energy of OH^-, plotted with respect to the diffuse-4 basis (see text for the details of basis). Variation of the binding energy (E_b) of the (b) OH^-(H2O) and (c) H3O^+(H2O) molecules with increasing size of the basis. Here DFA@FLOSIC refers to the DFA energy computed at the corresponding FLOSIC–DFA density. At the complete basis set limit, only SIC can bind the full excess electron in OH^- and OH^-(H2O).
2012.13469
fig-3.jpg
0.456735
264b9314d7654271942a412e4dbea9eb
Projection onto the OH^- axis of the PBE self-interaction error of the electron density for the hydroxyl group and two hydroxyl-water clusters. For further explanation, see the last two paragraphs of section 3.1.
2012.13469
fig-4.jpg
0.435226
0aecf45d7d4e47768babbf3b56b4a7dd
Error in the binding energies of the (a) deprotonated water clusters OH^- (H_2O)_n (n = 1–6) and (b) protonated water clusters H_3O^+(H_2O)_n (n = 1–3, and 6) with various functionals compared to the CCSD(T)-F12b reference <cit.>. Here a negative sign indicates overbinding. Self-interaction correction to the binding energies (E_b^ SIC) of the (c) deprotonated and (d) protonated water clusters.
2012.13469
fig-5.jpg
0.445348
2b7a725246a843b9a215262a242520d5
Isosurfaces (0.02 e/Å^3) of FLO densities from FLOSIC–SCAN for OH^-, H2O, H3O^+, OH^-(H2O), and H3O^+(H2O), showing lone-orbitals in blue and bond-orbitals in green.
2012.13469
fig-6.jpg
0.444033
14f124f26d1b4bb99091964da70f1775
(a) Error in the binding energies and (b) self-interaction correction to the binding energies (E_b^ SIC) of X^-(H_2O)_n with X=(F, Cl, Br) and n=1,2 with various functionals compared to the CCSD(T)-F12b reference.
2012.13469
fig-7.jpg
0.487817
df8f56b2154f45f0acaf79cb57b7f8d0
(a) Error in the binding energies and (b) self-interaction correction to the binding energies (E_b^ SIC) of M^+(H_2O)_n (M=Li, Na, K) and n=1,2 with various functionals compared to the CCSD(T)-F12b.
2012.13469
fig-8.jpg
0.455656
ccc915878d9b42a69c84a4ec0f4921d5
Mean unsigned error (MUE) given by different functionals for (a) deprotonated water, (b) protonated water, (c) water–halide, and (d) water–alkali clusters, shown from the top to the bottom.
2012.13469
fig-9.jpg
0.551352
265edbdb79b44e2a92d1e6103fe03a32
A rational -parallelogram envelope for n
2012.13471
fig1.jpg
0.493291
5d4b98a557f94befb2debcf42ea17c6c
A -parallelogram envelope with angle τ for n
2012.13471
fig2.jpg
0.474004
0d8ca3725a6c47a48abed32c1865b787
The role of w in -parallelogram envelope for n
2012.13471
fig3.jpg
0.53953
60f1f82269f64a698e0f095f539ee00a
A -parallelogram envelope with ratio m for n
2012.13471
fig4.jpg
0.377788
f4a5c7ad69ee4d1eaa258e58856dcc20
Two -parallelogram envelopes with ratio m for n and m n
2012.13471
fig5.jpg
0.4705
84c40d44643a42b29576d106ed794099
A τ-triangle for 2n n' obtained from a -parallelogram envelope for n
2012.13471
fig6.jpg
0.408171
f8054100699d4ed4879b206f8be337c3
A -parallelogram envelope with angle τ for n obtained from a rational τ-triangle for 2nn'
2012.13471
fig7.jpg
0.48899
a33583bb1ff64a8c845c0e9e7fc8e892
The eigenvalues λ of the linearized Eliashberg equation in the single-band Hubbard model. For reference, we plot the red (blue) marks represent the case where hopping parameters derived from DFT are used for Hg1201(Tl1201). The arrows indicate the values of λs in Hg1201 and Tl1201 when we use the evaluated U_screened in the constrained-RPA. The red and blue solid lines in the figure are guide for the eye. We write the names of compounds in abbreviated form.
2012.13472
FLEXv6.jpg
0.466849
0045e1ed13e0497d9fb8a3104b172a96
Atomic structures of (a)αBa_2CuO_4F and (b)βBa_2CuO_4 with α=Tl,In,Ga,Al and β=Hg,Cd,Zn. In TlBa_2CuO_5, F of αBa_2CuO_4F is replaced by O.
2012.13472
a_b_str_v2.jpg
0.443155
773fe77a2bba4820aa9b91de1a364d20
Band structures of (a)HgBa_2CuO_4, (b)TlBa_2CuO_5, (c) TlBa_2CuO_4F, (d) InBa_2CuO_4F, (e) GaBa_2CuO_4F, (f) AlBa_2CuO_4F, (g) CdBa_2CuO_4 and (h) ZnBa_2CuO_4. Wannier-interpolated bands are plotted with a red line. Here, the Fermi level is set to 0.
2012.13472
band_eight_eps.jpg
0.490763
7ced6d4d93f84325a5dcd8ce5218316c
Log-log plot of autocorrelation time τ_ac / Δτ and phonon frequency ω/t for λ = 0.1 and λ = 1.0. The black dotted lines are linear fits for each curve. For λ = 0.1, the slope is -0.9876 with R^2 = 0.9993 and for λ = 1.0, the slope is -0.8617 with R^2 = 0.9942. Can we scrutinize the λ=1 results and make sure the data are reliable? For any ω where we do not expect the result to be exact within error bars, the autocorrelation time is under-estimated. Again, this might not show up in a 'normal' run, if the semiclassical wf is biasing the sampling SO much
2012.13473
autocorr.jpg
0.419307
334b0e1228544387a648a37ff0e39f96
Born-Oppenheimer potential energy surfaces in units of t for the 2-electron and 2-site Holstein model: (a) ω=t, λ = 0.1t, and g=0.447t and (b) ω=t, λ = t, and g=1.414t. The minimum in (a) is E=-2.40 t at (X_1=0.63, X_2=0.63) while the two minima in (b) are E=-8.25 t at (X_1=3.90, X_2=0.10) and (X_1=0.10, X_2=3.90), respectively.
2012.13473
figure1.jpg
0.44488
9fe29229575740b5961b3a23a0c2f120
Total energy per site in units of t for the 20-site 20-electron 1D Holstein model as a function of ω for various values of λ values: (a) λ = 0.1 results, (b) λ = 0.3 results, (c) λ = 0.8 results, and (d) λ = 2.0 results. Note that all error bars for AFQMC are too small to be seen on the plotted scales, DMRG reference values are unavailable for ω < 0.8 when λ = 0.8 and λ = 2.0, and AFQMC/TP(11) is not presented for λ = 0.1 because the results for this trial wavefunction are nearly identical to those of AFQMC/S.
2012.13473
figure_20site.jpg
0.439144
fbef361653024d4b95659ec086de6bba
Error in total energy per site compared to DMRG in units of 0.001t for the 20-site 1D Hubbard-Holstein model at half-filling with U/t=4 as a function of ω for various λ values: (a) λ = 0.1 results and (b) λ = 1.0 results. The black dotted line in (a) indicates the electronic CP-AFQMC energy error (i.e., λ = 0.0). In (b), DMRG energies are only available for ω = 1.0, 1.5, 2.0. Note that for (b) the reference DMRG values are potentially unconverged with a maximum phonon number of 40 and the remaining time step error of CP-AFQMC is not negligible on the plotted energy scale.
2012.13473
figure_20site_error.jpg
0.48645
65c813b3faf047a3b581cd11ff107b8e
The total energy per site in units of t for the 20-site 1D Hubbard-Holstein model at half-filling with U=4t as a function of λ for various ω values: (a) ω = 0.1, (b) ω = 0.4, (c) ω = 1.0, and (d) ω = 2.0. Note that all error bars of CP-AFQMC are too small to be seen on the plotted scales. Note that the DMRG results are unavailable for ω = 0.1 and ω = 0.4 as well as for λ > 2.
2012.13473
figure_20site_hh_new.jpg
0.469602
7c3694ffc0bd48baa1c576b20b0efb25
Total energy per site in units of t for the 4x4 2D Hubbard-Holstein model with U/t=4 as a function of ω: (a) ω = 0.1 results at half-filling, (b) ω = 2.0 results at half-filling, (c) ω = 0.1 results at 1/8 hole-doping, and (d) ω = 2.0 results at 1/8 hole-doping. Note that all error bars of CP-AFQMC are too small to be seen on the plotted scales.
2012.13473
figure_4x4_hh_2d_final.jpg
0.460532
3c0dbcfd2b9a487e8e0a2f5415be171a
Total energy per site in units of t for the 4x4 2D Holstein model at half-filling as a function of ω for various λ values: (a) λ = 0.1 results, (b) λ = 0.3 results, (c) λ = 0.5 results, and (d) λ = 2.0 results. Note that all error bars of CP-AFQMC/S are too small to be seen on the plotted scales, DMRG reference values are only available for ω≥ 0.8 when λ < 2.0.
2012.13473
figure_4x4_holstein.jpg
0.399262
6c480c4b3614405995f7fd7df41b1a5e
Error in the total energy in units of t for the 2-site 2-electron Holstein model as a function of ω for various λ values: (a) CSMP2, (b) LFPT2 and (c) AFQMC results. For λ = 0.1, LFPT2 energy errors lie outside the plotted range. In (c), for λ≥0.5 AFQMC/TP(11) results are shown while for λ = 0.1 we present AFQMC/S results. Note the different vertical scales in panel (c).
2012.13473
lambda_shiwei.jpg
0.495769
c7ad914846f84b04bd0860edb7939763
SimCLR <cit.> can be re-casted as a phylogenetic tree where augmentations are evolution. In the original <cit.> paper, x is an input image, and two image augmentation methods, t_1 and t_2, are sampled from a set of image augmentation methods 𝒯, to produce image augmentation v_1 and v_2, which are then passed into a trainable encoder g(·) (i.e. g_1 and g_2 share parameters entirely). In conceptualizing evolution as an augmentation strategy, x can be viewed as a common ancestor, while 𝒯 denote possible evolutionary trajectories, characterized by different evolutionary distance, mutation and genetic drift, and t_1, t_2 are two example trajectories that lead to v_1 and v_2, sampled from a set of homologs. Note that notations are adapted from the original SimCLR paper for consistency with the current work.
2012.13475
simclr_phylo.jpg
0.426264
18468b1273d24d2aa70de0e86aeb7a4a
Maximum errors of the SOE approximations of the Gaussian kernel with the number of exponentials. Data are shown for five SOE methods: the best rational approximation, the parabolic contour, the hyperbolic contour, the modified Talbot contour and the VPMR. The dash-dotted lines with different color indicate the fitting lines of corresponding SOE methods.
2012.13477
Compare.jpg
0.421408
709c63b18e6740f7b7da0f084a54aa5b
CPU time as function of t for different time steps h=0.05 (red square), 0.01 (green circle) and 0.005 (blue triangle). The solid lines are linear fitting of these data.
2012.13477
Time.jpg
0.468258
95df462a63d641efb7693c2c9762f29b
Applying the effect of action on the OGMs: Left: OGM 𝐢_t and corresponding action at time t. Middle: the output of IOT1, 𝐣^ego_t+1, after applying transformation on the ego-features of 𝐢_t, . Right: the output of IOT2, 𝐣^env_t+1, after applying transformation on 𝐢_t+1.
2012.13478
IOTs.jpg
0.386138
45fd05b4859c48b893034eb1f83539b2
Distribution of actions.
2012.13478
actions.jpg
0.410743
2612550f891e48d187b3d791b55d1946
The prediction model with all of its components. The measurement estimation module updates the position and velocity of the ego-vehicle and provides transformation parameters for OGM transformer modules. IOT1 and IOT2 provide information about the first and second-order effect of action on the OGM, respectively. Prediction module is trained to minimize the cost in Eq. <ref>.
2012.13478
apm_train_3.jpg
0.402026
6b96823413b64f018132e5246fae682e
OGM prediction using PA-DL model. The top row is the target sequence and the middle row shows the predictions. The bottom row shows the difference between two consecutive frames, learned by the model, where the red areas are erased from the frame and the green areas are added to build the next frame.
2012.13478
argoverse_2.jpg
0.443187
9e88d8e721ab427fa2fd34a31e64d02f
Difference learning module
2012.13478
diff_model_2.jpg
0.484043
3daa3f59e0a74d918907f80a8e8ca603
Graphical model at time t: Left: Generative links, p(.). Right: Variational links, q(.). Observable variables are gray.
2012.13478
gm.jpg
0.426473
1c20bde86066424e981fefd352ce87e5
Computing the effect of actions on the future position, velocity and change in the direction of the car.
2012.13478
measurements.jpg
0.417776
35d97ff57e0e46b8b7ebf1ba83273978
Predictions of 10 frames (1 sec) by different models.
2012.13478
ngsim_1.jpg
0.557182
f0739d1315ef4b42b5c5fe5cf995671c
Effect of constantly applying rare actions on the prediction of PA and FM-MPUR models.
2012.13478
ngsim_2.jpg
0.450266
c70d51c0c7f44b47bdc2e5072c53218c
The prediction module at the training time. The measurements are encoded using fully-connected networks, while we use convolutional neural networks to encode and decode OGMs.
2012.13478
pm_high_level.jpg
0.433415
79c9d540a9ae4b6faa0a4975705875ff
Detailed structure of the prediction module.
2012.13478
prediction_module_2.jpg
0.453474
b159a48505b7404d9338456d537e16ff
Flow and occupancy measured in the month of August by detector 508302.
2012.13479
detector_508302_august_data.jpg
0.468074
bc32a28be5aa4168a29fdb1290d04667
Test predictions of DCRNN, GRU, and ARIMAX on flow measured in the month of December by detector 508306. The model was trained with a window size of 1hr and a horizon of 6 data points, or half an hour. Here we show the predictions with a horizon of 6, where DCRNN improves the most compared to the other methods.
2012.13479
detector_508306_baselines.jpg
0.443011
4d2f7bd26f7e4cc6aff431129ff31338
Test predictions of DCRNN on flow measured in the month of December by detector 508306. The model was trained with a window size of 1hr and a horizon of 6 data points, or half an hour.
2012.13479
detector_508306_predictions.jpg
0.391397
3e1386f760df40f18ab0d61a8038f476
Flow-occupancy diagram for detector 508306, one of our detectors of interest.
2012.13479
fundamental_diagram_508306.jpg
0.410901
0c64ce7b70a7433b8fc72733a65883da
Large eddy simulation of the vortex induced vibration of a flexible riser in linearly sheared flow. Top figure, instantaneous vortical flow patterns; bottom figure, the corresponding riser displacement (red curve). Note that, the magnitude of the displacement has been enlarged in order to visualize it more clearly.
2012.13481
riser_VIV.jpg
0.40951
9a9c929652334af3ad6d443da33a8ecd
Transmission dynamics of the Corona virus
2012.13483
MarkovChain.jpg
0.450842
33f13b0dd7184cf99dc425fb2fc6d499
An illustrative example of a heterogeneous contact network.
2012.13483
network.jpg
0.495153
5e54987602384078a6481a873e4472af
An example random walk of length 6 on a network.
2012.13483
random_walk.jpg
0.443237
15c0fedaecb0403d9968bafad3504222
Graphical illustration of the box strategy with increment 3 shown for player number 4 and total 10 boxes. The player starts with box 4 and opens every 3^rd box till the key is found or maximum number of allowed attempts is reached.
2012.13484
box_strategy.jpg