dedup-isc-ft-v107-score
float64
0.32
1
uid
stringlengths
32
32
text
stringlengths
0
32.5k
paper_id
stringlengths
1
14
original_image_filename
stringlengths
5
222
0.449607
82af288296b141b381c50ce0538a6b23
Architecture comparison between baseline neural network and energy conservation neural network. In the figure, the blocks represent layers of neural network (NN). u and v represents the earthquake wave displacement and velocity respectively. du and dv represent the derivative of u and v with respect to time.
2012.14334
baseline_vs_ecnn.jpg
0.56707
ee4440b81a5c48c1a35773ec765e3d64
Illustrative architecture of the proposed energy conservation neural network.
2012.14334
ecnn_arch.jpg
0.496891
a93aa4fea4e641d6b78cbbf2351f6730
Damping effects in energy conservation neural network. In the figure, the system energy decreases with time due to the damping effects. In addition, the maximum displacement magnitude u_t also decreases with time.
2012.14334
ecnn_damping.jpg
0.435541
7e74b06e165b478e825445d8cec67c3e
The relationship between the input energy E_I and the damping energy E_D in a dynamic system. The system energy becomes stable when the input energy E_I equals to the damping energy E_D.
2012.14334
ecnn_input_energy.jpg
0.465411
eab0d1bbce7541959fc3bc05d547868b
Computation graph of neural network.
2012.14334
ecnn_latent_space.jpg
0.521584
2c34d88c2e4e431dbaef2d78388363f5
Computation graph for multiple degrees of freedom using neural network.
2012.14334
ecnn_mdof_arch.jpg
0.460634
ef0f7740a5a344f9b911b02cdad2fe7e
Soil modeling: stress-strain response curve
2012.14334
soil_stress_strain.jpg
0.451799
ff5294f129e143358ffeae254c1ed15d
Test error over the entire training set at the end of each epoch. Wider dimensions tend to have smaller testing error.
2012.14334
stats_by_dim.jpg
0.406657
16cf9a9a52484c9c86b4dc4e008fed40
Test error over the entire training set at the end of each epoch. Testing error decreases with the increasing number of hidden layers.
2012.14334
stats_by_layer.jpg
0.487474
5ca441e9c93142b5bb4d246a9383981a
The trade-off between accuracy and speed with increasing model depth. Lower is better for both axes.
2012.14334
stats_layer_time.jpg
0.444351
d1a0b6860fb64e62af9474b7a0efc203
prediction.
2012.14336
trend-1.jpg
0.392483
e0e7217d46344883b814a484a3c67ba0
Mass posterior means and 90% credible intervals for inputted m_β near zero. It is possible to distinguish the mass from zero for true m_β≳0.04 eV, with outliers characterized by large uncertainties δ_inst (energy broadening standard dev.).
2012.14341
12-7B_7D_mass-90--hdi-post-intervals.jpg
0.425958
76907cbd19b1444fb819e47d0da3a394
Distribution of mass ordering results with respect to m_L and mass sensitivity (Δ t=2 yrs). The normal (inverted) ordering was reported when a 98.5% (85.5%) η credible interval excluded one ordering and was consistent with the other.
2012.14341
2nu-2yr-update_MH-reporting_mL-sensitivity-vs-m_L_985-855.jpg
0.426176
52195a7bf4874fa0badb0b6f43e9e097
For 2 yrs of data assuming normal (dots) and inverted (triangles) orderings, posterior means and intervals on η as a function of potential sensitivity to m_L, defined as C.I. width.
2012.14341
2nu-2yr-update_eta-90-post-vs-sensitivity.jpg
0.426336
b647102ae6334836bebdb4d1bbe3a446
Neutrino mass posterior means and 90% credible intervals as a function of inputted m_β, for a one-neutrino model and the assumed experimental design. Interval widths (“sensitivities") decrease with m_β, asymptoting at ∼5 meV.
2012.14341
cenpa_mass-90-log-hdi-post-residuals.jpg
0.478
8e60484d2c9242c7a09e6e394ae78f54
Example pseudo-spectra overlaid on predicted curves (Eq. <ref> numerically convolved with a Gaussian) for normal and inverted orderings, with m_L=0 eV and a 2 yr runtime. Spectra are plotted as a function of the difference between reconstructed energy and the T endpoint.
2012.14341
mass-ordering-data-comparison-relativeK.jpg
0.45403
9134aa3be85348d78a41bc9f150ae64c
For one pseudo-experiment, example posterior probability density plots and 2D-histograms (in both contour and scatter plot form) for parameters in the two-neutrino spectral model. Posteriors were obtained by analyzing data (Δ t =1 yr) that was generated assuming a normal mass ordering.
2012.14341
newfig6_2.jpg
0.422086
3e7429fa635a4334978fa1717ce5f613
Numerical estimation of the distribution P(E| ρ̂; Ĥ) in a seven-levels (d=7) system in which Ĥ has eigenvalues { -1.6,-1.2,-0.6,0,0.4,1.3,1.7 }, and ρ̂ has eigenvalues { 0.395,0.224,0.151,0.115,0.079,0.0020,0.013 }. The histogram plots the empirical distribution of E(Ûρ̂Û^†; Ĥ) for a sample of 10^5 unitary matrices U ∈ U(7), which are distributed uniformly according to the Haar measure. The blue line is the probability density function of the Gaussian distribution P_G^(μ,Σ^(2))(E) with the variance Σ^(2) given by (<ref>). In this example Σ^(2)≃ 0.02024 and η_Ĥ≃ 0.2317.
2012.14342
plot1.jpg
0.540437
6f0192898ec145a494bf68de0a4e9b2a
An elementary cell of the ring chain graph
2012.14344
Figure01.jpg
0.513743
4146dcb2af03451984bfe991de548d49
The band edge crossings indicated by black dots for ℓ=1, ℓ_3=1/3π in dependence on ℓ_1>0. The red lines correspond to flat bands indicated in the first two bullet points above, independent of ℓ_1. On the other hand, the dots at k^2=4 and 16 correspond to the flat bands of the second bullet point independent of ℓ_3.
2012.14344
Figure02.jpg
0.470061
ae57a9966c904cb9a93bf6660d19ef84
The positive spectrum for ℓ=1 and ℓ_1=3/2π
2012.14344
Figure03.jpg
0.502269
2edb4d57e5654cc195fe65b986e8b2fa
The positive spectrum for ℓ=1 and ℓ_1=1/3π
2012.14344
Figure04.jpg
0.479909
1a94a9597b714369a11e432ab2dd3bd4
Band width leading term vs. band index (referring to bands around the points nπ/ℓ_1) for ℓ_1= ℓ_3 = 4/11π, ℓ_2=18/11π, and ℓ=1 in comparison with the gap width
2012.14344
Figure05.jpg
0.507069
808ffcec8feb432b8142c5892530f7d7
The leading term vs. band index for ℓ_1= π/5, ℓ_2=13π/7, ℓ_3=π/7, and ℓ=1, again in comparison with the gaps width
2012.14344
Figure06.jpg
0.447298
80dae0e3a2c44c9d8faa23f4becb2109
The leading term vs. band index for ℓ_1=1, ℓ_2=ℓ_3=π, and ℓ=1
2012.14344
Figure07.jpg
0.42923
a1dab28219f0446b83d377c95fc622a7
The leading term vs. band index for ℓ_1=1, ℓ_2/ℓ_3=1+√(5)/2, and ℓ=1
2012.14344
Figure08.jpg
0.421939
218a6441ac9948bf9285398fd2d51214
The same as above but with ℓ_1=π
2012.14344
Figure09.jpg
0.450629
813ca250ba5a4910b6c418ec2be463cc
The full band spectrum in the situation of Example <ref> with ℓ=1
2012.14344
Figure10.jpg
0.468774
eba874bfbe564bc5a93a3f519d0f1501
The full band spectrum in the situation of Example <ref> with ℓ_1=π
2012.14344
Figure11.jpg
0.480844
b13cd0cf70fb4709a5c4b0720dfa0b4a
The negative spectrum for ℓ=3/2 and ℓ_3=2/3π as a function of ℓ_1>0, the dot indicates the band crossing point.
2012.14344
Figure12.jpg
0.387792
8a0acf69da1149f9ab68c1c8edee3267
The positive spectrum for ℓ=1/3.
2012.14344
Figure13.jpg
0.550178
da25537a7b30474cb7ca71ef333df6b6
The band dependence on ℓ_3 for ℓ=1/2.
2012.14344
Figure14.jpg
0.450736
882fe17a94e84593a4e6cc25419d6c56
The positive spectrum for ℓ=1. The red lines mark embedded flat bands, the dots the points where the gaps close.
2012.14344
Figure15.jpg
0.52507
9f24804228b0480b9479e9090094f2e2
The band dependence on ℓ_1 for ℓ=1/2.
2012.14344
Figure16.jpg
0.469918
2886210f8ecc414d82519cf67f0c07c8
Overview of the proposed pipeline. Refer to Sec. <ref> for details.
2012.14345
architecture.jpg
0.462985
0b4d3cdfda974077b91abf71de495bb1
Example images of the datasets used for this work: a) iCWT dataset; b) pois in TABLE-TOP dataset; c) white in TABLE-TOP dataset; d) HO-3D; e) YCB-Video training set, f) YCB-Video test set.
2012.14345
dataset.jpg
0.505192
d7700056a9bc4ca680b4281ef12dc2b5
Example predictions on the TARGET-UNLABELED before model adaptation, selected by the for SS as positives (red boxes) and negatives (green boxes).
2012.14345
detected_image_square.jpg
0.504859
7ac58aacfde24fa5aae1f9c7b83533b7
mAP comparison of pool-based (red) and stream-based (green) AL strategies with varying query budgets for iCubWorld (a) and YCB (b) domains.
2012.14345
plots.jpg
0.446262
a39f54d9f1b64871aba43f9cae03405b
Diagnostic plot for Event 1. The rows show a series of 0.5^∘×0.5^∘ filtered maps corresponding to PA4 f150, PA5 f150, PA6 f150, PA4 f220, PA5 f090 and PA6 f090 from the bottom to the top, while the columns correspond to individual 3-day chunks of data for the 2017-2019 observing seasons, with those that don't have exposure near this object omitted (so there are implicit, variable-length gaps between each column). The maps are in units of signal-to-noise ratio, spanning from -8 (blue) to +8 (red). Time increases from left to right. It is clear that this region is quiet until the last map where a strong point source suddenly appears in all arrays that hit it. The columns are not equi-spaced, and there is a gap of 12 days between the preceding thumbnail maps and the ones in which the source is detected. The source is evident in the PA4 time line but the data do not pass our data quality cuts. The time for the last map spans from 2019-11-7 00:00:00 to 2019-11-10 00:00:00. Unfortunately, there are no observations of this region in 2019 after those shown in this figure. There is a several month long gap before any 2020 coverage of this region, and the 2020 data is not yet ready for analysis.
2012.14347
fig1.jpg
0.473904
876411397fad4ce39c6f2f0789d7e76e
High-resolution light curve for Event 1 made by subdividing the ACT detector arrays into 4 sub-sections that hit the source at slightly different times. We observe a rapid rise from about 180 to 600 mJy at f090 and from 600 to 1100 mJy at f150 over the course of 8 minutes followed by what might be the beginning of a slower decay. We do not detect anything at this location before this, even when averaging four years of data. The gap between -4 and 0 minutes on the x-axis corresponds to the separation between two of our detector arrays. Unfortunately there are no observations of this region in 2019 after this. No f220 data survived our data cuts during the event.
2012.14347
light_curve_cand_011_nogain.jpg
0.45798
97bbe939266d4acc94c596256abea07e
The light curve for Event 3 . The event starts with a sudden rise from below our detection limit to about 300 mJy in all three of ACT's frequency bands. It then decays roughly linearly to nearly undetectable over the course of 3 days, after which there is a new jump up to about 150 mJy followed by a new decay. There are large gaps in our coverage of these coordinates after this, but by day 12-15 the source is undetectable in f150 and f220 and barely detectable in f090. We do not detect it after this. In sky maps built from all our data (including the event itself) we detect an object at this location only in f090, at 3.5 σ.
2012.14347
light_curve_cand_018.jpg
0.522527
eb2327a4573e44b9a0595bbe4c9d97fb
Comparison of the characteristic luminosity with other bright mm-wave star flares from the literature. act-1/2/3: Event 1/2/3 from this paper. alma-1/2: Proxima Centauri <cit.> and AU Mic <cit.> flares measured with ALMA. bima-1: Flaring of GMR-A in the Orion Nebula <cit.>. eff-1, pdbi-1: V773 Tau by <cit.> and <cit.> respectively. ovma-1: Gem <cit.>. scuba2-1: JW 566 <cit.>.
2012.14347
mm_flares.jpg
0.485744
7d3b5bac20d14c4bbd6387bad43a1af4
The distance between the weights of a valid count-constraint point to the local minima followed by the application of 𝒫_𝒞 to it
2012.14348
moon_prop.jpg
0.488946
28d2f591d8774f25b14bc131da90e347
A variety of curves that minimizes the MSE under different quantile constraints, and regular least squares minimization.
2012.14348
quantiles.jpg
0.46817
cc640c49a6a5423a851f9716b93ee97d
Overview of the methodology of Roofpedia.
2012.14349
Wireframe.jpg
0.441684
b05261c676b64bb482e1b5e154c01891
Geospatial engineering of the predicted result: tagging buildings with sustainable rooftops based on detected greenery and solar panels on them.
2012.14349
geospatial.jpg
0.424904
7c4b050228c74b0d86efa659d63e4a9b
Illustration describing the project and its organisation in three parts.
2012.14349
graphical_r.jpg
0.446617
93519c359ce04ea684447dfe3463cd2f
Examples of green roof model confusions.
2012.14349
green-roof-confusions.jpg
0.462101
b4c707ced2b545358c1b1cc45a3cfe75
Labelling solar panels and rooftop greenery across cities.
2012.14349
labelling.jpg
0.434334
accee2f7af194a00a61ff92da8690c9e
Model prediction results compared with ground truth.
2012.14349
model.jpg
0.393227
09078418dc5942ebbd449f2fafce9091
A visualisation for understanding the spatial density of solar roofs (example for Singapore).
2012.14349
singapore.jpg
0.414296
ee5854c10d4146e18cccb681036f816c
Examples of solar roof model confusions.
2012.14349
solar-roof-confusions.jpg
0.417479
56c91921a70b4d5cb8419a8399c48959
Tiling of satellite images and labels.
2012.14349
tiling.jpg
0.428058
e236a08711484b75bc85363f9124d7e9
Mapping buildings with sustainable rooftops (example for New York City).
2012.14349
vis.jpg
0.389683
30c258ae7bd1460e9de1794cb9e72d90
DeepBeam in a vehicular ad hoc scenario. (a) Vehicle 1 is communicating with vehicle 3, vehicle 2 with vehicle 4. Using DeepBeam, vehicles 1 and 4 infer the reciprocal aoa by passively eavesdropping ongoing data transmissions. (b) Vehicles 1 and 4 can steer the beam toward each other when they need to exchange data.
2012.14350
adhoc.jpg
0.467627
778730d82ddc4c47b5e7c33aa378175b
Configuration of the room where the single-RF-chain dataset was collected, and position of the radios in the basic and diagonal configuration, and of the obstacle.
2012.14350
radio_ni_positions.jpg
0.476197
667c02e959b94b24b0984fbaacd2d37b
Illustration of the Proposed HPConv. Local feature maps also used to extract global feature maps. denote the concatnation over channel dimension.
2012.14360
hierarchical_pyramidal_convolution.jpg
0.42263
0a583875bb02431f8c718aa7c86ef9f3
The block-diagram of the proposed model. Our model can be divided to three main parts: the frontend module, the backend module and the consensus module. The input tensor and its shape of each module are given below. Our main contributions are highlighted in yellow.
2012.14360
overview_of_our_approach.jpg
0.470119
d497822c682d45fdae262b5decd3c77a
Illustration of the PyConv. The illustration is adapted from <cit.>. Local and global feature maps are extracted from the input feature maps respectively. ⊛ denotes the convolution operation.
2012.14360
pyramidal_convolution.jpg
0.466408
ea3b8a59b9c640ccafa04a8130977eba
An example of a video sample annotated as "ABOUT". Only frames at time step T = 9∼ 19 are related with the word "ABOUT".
2012.14360
video_sample_of_ABOUT.jpg
0.477529
4d96d15dd20c468d9776d70c67510b5a
Example of Dense Folding. When the extent of a DenseData matches the stride of a parent StreamData, the parent/child combination can be replaced with a single larger DenseData.
2012.14363
dense-folding.jpg
0.394266
7800eebc932c410e904101c2bae70c1c
MPI_Pack performance for a variety of 2D objects described as a vector or subarray datatype. “Size” is the total object size, “count” is the number of objects packed, and “contiugous block size” is the number of contiguous bytes in each block of the object. The pitch of each contiguous block is 512. TEMPI provides fast handling regardless of MPI datatype construction or datatype count.
2012.14363
pack_2d.jpg
0.500323
d48f9e6147da412087bc70665b7ee3f7
Example of stream elision. When a child has only a single element, it can be removed from the Type tree.
2012.14363
stream-elision.jpg
0.464146
96ece099a1ad447cae80eb0728b26677
Example of stream flattening. When the parent stride allows repeated children to maintain a fixed stride between their elements, the parent and child can be flattened into a single stream.
2012.14363
stream-flatten.jpg
0.432946
2d9927b3b9b243cd99353e0dc115227d
A 3D object with extent E_0 × E_1 × E_2 floats in an allocation A_0 × A_1 × A_2 bytes, and the corresponding linearized memory layout.
2012.14363
stride.jpg
0.442694
e90973a424324e42b3325229b8cf91a7
MPI_Send / MPI_Recv latency for the one-shot, device, model-based automatic selection, and Summit MPI baseline. The vast majority of the performance improvement comes from the datatype handling, before the one-shot or device method is selected.
2012.14363
summit_2d_latency.jpg
0.462066
407d577fba114f9bbdb513a4501e68c3
Normalized latency of the one-shot, device, and model-based selection based on the measured system parameters. The model-based automatic selection reliably chooses the faster method with minimal overhead.
2012.14363
summit_2d_normalized.jpg
0.487185
d9f5a05f393d4520b1b6c5edc981296b
Device pack.
2012.14363
summit_device_pack.jpg
0.44326
f9c4bdcb8ea34d1aa4d70fa538134286
Device unpack.
2012.14363
summit_device_unpack.jpg
0.379734
8c773ad9bd7546e4b83b6f3258531470
Performance of phases of halo exchange. Alltoallv time is higher for more ranks and more nodes. Pack/Unpack time is constant, as the amount of data moved per rank is unchanged.
2012.14363
summit_halo_exchange_latency.jpg
0.416364
5fd66d1c5a234d18aae20c879fa01d2b
Speedup of entire halo exchange. Speedup is lower for larger number of ranks as datatype handling is a smaller portion of the total time.
2012.14363
summit_halo_exchange_sp.jpg
0.485902
15bfcb54cbec461e96f5f2de16a51d20
Partial values of T_device, T_oneshot, and T_staged, (excluding pack time), using the values from (a).
2012.14363
summit_model_no_pack.jpg
0.451214
1554ca795f8d48a895cf8f1e48289dbf
One-shot pack.
2012.14363
summit_oneshot_pack.jpg
0.464021
2488cf781bfd4f1eb341214c2db70913
One-shot unpack.
2012.14363
summit_oneshot_unpack.jpg
0.499262
e9b65c991eca4bfcb4d005f55fd489ee
Measurements of T_d2h, T_h2d, T_cpu-cpu, and T_gpu-gpu on Summit.
2012.14363
summit_raw.jpg
0.400127
e147551c7b4a47f39b73cc064ac5ac46
The application source file (202) includes the MPI header file provided by the system (204). It is compiled (203) and linked with the system MPI implementation. When the binary (205) is executed, symbols are resolved and the MPI code from the system MPI library is executed. The TEMPI source files (207) are compiled (208) into a dynamic library (209) using the system MPI header. The application is compiled as normal except for TEMPI being inserted into the link order (203), or an unmodified application can be used with the LD_PRELOAD mechanism. When the application is executed, any symbols defined by the TEMPI library will be resolved there (209), allowing the TEMPI code to be executed. Any others will be resolved in the system implementation.
2012.14363
tempi.jpg
0.419883
13ec524cf8504506a989cb5a1451bf12
Three different MPI C fragments to generate the 3D object from Fig. <ref> with A_0=256, A_1=512, A_2=1024, E_0=100, E_1=13, and E_2=47. The right-hand side shows the corresponding Type IR after translation, with parent above child . Equivalent objects can be represented differently and require a later transformation pass.
2012.14363
translation.jpg
0.44459
c71f25e0a560410a99cb7eb02df467bc
Time for MPI derived datatype creation and commit time for a variety of 3D objects described with subarray (0-2), hvector of vector (3-5), hvector of hvector of vector (6-11), and subarray of vector (12-14). The “create” component uses MPI_Type* and MPI_Type_create* family of MPI APIs to describe the type. The “commit” component is how much time is consumed in MPI_Type_commit. The trimean of 30000 executions of each phase is reported. Create time is unchanged (TEMPI does nothing) and is reported for comparison. TEMPI's performance varies due to different required canonicalization operations. TEMPI slows commit time substantially, but it still has a negligible impact on application run time.
2012.14363
type_commit.jpg
0.434479
523b9c7f7fc546f187d4a4a1421c8286
Marangoni forces F̅_ M/π Pe and F̅_ M, tot/π Pe as a function of imposed velocity U̅ together with corresponding concentration profiles (in the z̅x̅-plane and in three dimensions) in the decoupled limit Pe≪U̅. All results are from numerical FEM solutions of the axisymmetric diffusion-advection equation in two-dimensional angular representation with ρ<R̅=30. In the advective regime U̅≫ 1 a concentration boundary layer develops [see Eq. (<ref>)].
2012.14364
FUA3.jpg
0.475461
fb4b847b95f44fe09260d8c84f994e6c
Iterative three-dimensional FEM results for F̅_ M/π Pe (top) and F̅_ M,tot/π Pe (bottom) as a function of U̅ for Pe = 0-50 for a cubic system with -7 < y̅ <0, 0<x̅<7, -7<z̅<7. Insets show the slopes F̅_ M/U̅π Pe and F̅_ M,tot/U̅π Pe as a function of Pe calculated from the results for U̅=0.1. Artificial symmetry breaking from lattice irregularities/defects is prevented by averaging all measured quantities over two simulations with U and -U. Blue open circles are results for Pe=0 from FEM solutions to the axisymmetric diffusion-advection equation in two-dimensional angular representation with R̅=30. The slope in the linear response regime for U̅≪ 1 is reduced according to Eq. (<ref>). Results for U̅≫ 1 are essentially not affected by strong Marangoni flows Pe≫U̅.
2012.14364
FUPer7.jpg
0.547811
1250c03e5066456e9a2e4e63a3c7da12
Iterative three-dimensional FEM results for F̅_ M/π Pe (top) and F̅_ M,tot/π Pe (middle) as a function of U̅ for Pe = 0 and Biot numbers k̅=0-400 for a half-cylindrical system with ρ <15, x̅>0, -4 < y̅ <0, Blue dashed lines are results for k̅=0 from FEM solutions to the axisymmetric diffusion-advection equation in two-dimensional angular representation with R̅=30. Forces in the diffusive regime U̅≪ 1 are reduced according to Eq. (<ref>). Forces in the advective regime U̅≫ 1 are reduced according to Eq. (<ref>). Bottom row: FEM results for F̅_ M/π Pe and F̅_ M,tot/π Pe as a function of Biot number k̅ for U̅=10^-4,100 in comparison to scaling results in Eqs. (<ref>) and (<ref>).
2012.14364
FUkcylr15new.jpg
0.420673
6cb9a3c05cfd4dcebfafbbac0e2ce758
Average Nusselt number as a function of U̅ for constant flux and constant concentration boundary conditions in the decoupled limit Pe≪U̅. All results are from numerical FEM solutions of the axisymmetric diffusion-advection equation in two-dimensional angular representation with ρ<R̅=30.
2012.14364
NusseltU4.jpg
0.496079
772a366dab8142e08e0bf91a87e5fcbe
Different theory results for Pe-U̅_ swim swimming relations in a double-logarithmic plot in comparison to experimental results on PEG-alginate swimmers (red lines, obtained from the data in Fig. <ref>) and camphor boats from Ref. <cit.> (black lines and dots; black line is time-dependent data, black dots are data at fixed times but for different radii a). PEG-alginate swimmers are described well by the high Reynolds number theory without evaporation (Biot number k̅=0); camphor boats are best described by a high Reynolds number theory with Biot number k̅≈ 550. The corresponding low Reynolds number theories give significantly lower swimming speeds.
2012.14364
Uswimexp.jpg
0.467098
abac31ab48214a5db5f126859dc5f9d1
Synthesis of PEG-alginate swimmers by pipetting microliter amounts of PEG-alginate solution into cross-linker solution. Side view of a PEG-alginate swimmer showing its half-spherical shape.
2012.14364
fig2.jpg
0.452285
f86c0953219c4d7eb2dd9e2e59975deb
Swimming trajectory of two PEG-alginate swimmers in a cylindrical container. Color-coded is the sign of the curvature, blue/red trajectories curve clockwise/counter-clockwise. Swimmers prepared according to same protocol exhibit individually different curving behavior (left: mostly counter-clockwise, right: mostly clockwise). Reflections at walls are of different duration.
2012.14364
fig5.jpg
0.393319
35e06e29baeb456a837c0a83297d7d1d
PIV measurements of a PEG-alginate swimmer (A) after dripping and (B) in motion. The velocity scale bar refers to the fluid velocities, which are also color-coded for velocity. The white dashed arrows indicate the direction of the particle motion. On the right we indicate the fluid motion in (B) featuring radial Marangoni flow (blue), combined with flows corresponding to two counter-rotating vortices created by particle motion (green), and downstream Karman-like vortices (red).
2012.14364
fig6_small.jpg
0.450682
93332c489c4642a6900bb1bd46e3823a
Left: Mass of the PEG-alginate swimmers as a function of time with an exponential fit m(t) = m_∞ + m_0exp(-t/τ_m) (see text); error bars (light blue) denote the standard deviation. Middle: Resulting mass loss -ṁ as a function of time. Right: Corresponding velocity of the swimmer averaged over 10 swimmers; error bars (light blue) denote the standard deviation. The orange line is a fit U_ swim(t) = u_0exp(-t/τ_u,0)+ u_1exp(-t/τ_u,1) (see text) motivated by the existence of two swimming phases.
2012.14364
mdot3vexp2.jpg
0.354834
ac1fd165a2274ec5948d2fc7cf4157e3
(color online) MBE layer structure of GaAs/AlGaAs single heterojunctions used in: (a) Series I, and (b) Series II. Table <ref> lists the AlGaAs barrier thickness for each wafer. The dashed red line indicates the location of the 2DEG.
2012.14370
Fig1.jpg
0.443107
dbc19f9b5d7c45a8a6630089d5d2941d
(color online) Electron mobilities for ambipolar sample L (with both n-type and p-type ohmic contacts) shown in Fig. <ref>(c), and close-up view of the multiple biased illuminations at V_topgate = -2, -4, -6, and +4 V in chronological order. The two dashed lines are otherwise identical mobility simulations, except for a difference of Δ N_sc = 8 × 10^10 /cm^2 in surface charge density, using the Boltzmann transport model described in section <ref>. The two key features to note here are: (i) all the V_topgate < 0 biased illumination mobilities fall on the same mobility curve μ(n_2d), and (ii) the mobility after the V_topgate = +4 V biased illumination increases.
2012.14370
Fig10.jpg
0.432549
51a678cf74e041c1aa715b01bf40d4ca
(color online) Non-reversibility of transport characteristics after biased illuminations on unipolar sample M (with only n-type ohmic contacts). For all panels, the chronological order of biased illuminations and symbols used are identical to that indicated in Figure <ref>(c). (a) Unlike ambipolar Hall bars [Fig. <ref>], the mobilities after the V_topgate = +4 V biased illumination (`▴') do not increase, but remain on the same mobility curve μ(n_2d) (dashed line) as those from V_topgate < 0 biased illuminations (open symbols). (b) Likewise, the mobilities of the initial V_topgate = 0 V biased illumination (`+') are not recovered when another V_topgate = 0 V biased illumination is performed (`×') after the V_topgate < 0 biased illuminations (for clarity, only the `♢' symbols are shown), in contrast to behavior shown in Figs. <ref> and <ref> for ambipolar devices. The two dashed lines are otherwise identical μ(n_2d) mobility simulations, except for a difference of Δ N_sc = 6 × 10^10 /cm^2 in surface charge density, using the Boltzmann transport model described in section <ref>. (c) Unlike ambipolar Hall bars [see Figures <ref>(a) and <ref>(b)], the n_2d(V_topgate) curve of the original V_topgate = 0 biased illumination (`+') is not recovered after the subsequent V_topgate = 0 biased illumination (`×'). The + 0.33 V shift to a higher threshold topgate voltage to reach the same electron density is consistent with our prediction of a permanent increase in surface charge density N_sc after a V_topgate<0 biased illumination (see main text).
2012.14370
Fig11.jpg
0.447913
9697e6bb17374974aaea4f87fb9644c5
(color online) Effect of surface charge. (a) Experimental 2DEG mobilities at T = 1.5 K for 3 wafers (symbols) at different depths (taken from Ref. WendyPhD). Solid (red) lines are fits from the model in section III with the parameters listed in Table <ref>. The only fit parameter that changes between the three red curves is the surface charge density N_sc. All data taken in the dark. (b) Breakdown of the contributions to the mobilities shown in panel (a). The (orange) dashed line is the contribution from interface roughness (IR), common to all 3 wafers. The (green) dotted line is the contribution from the average background impurity concentration (BI), common to all 3 wafers. The (purple) solid lines are the contributions from surface charge (SC) for each wafer. For wafer A2511 (40 nm deep 2DEG), surface charge is the most significant scattering mechanism over the entire electron density range, whereas surface charge is negligible for the 310 nm deep 2DEG in wafer A2513 at all electron densities because the surface is very far away from the 2DEG. For the 80 nm deep 2DEG in wafer A2512, even though surface charge causes less scattering than either background impurities and/or interface roughness, it is still strong enough to cause the mobility to be noticeably less than wafer A2513.
2012.14370
Fig12.jpg
0.447709
e56616fefb064976a3180c2d5f618a92
(color online) One-parameter mobility fit of 2DEGs, showcasing typical MBE chamber clean-up within a growth campaign, resulting in much-reduced background impurity concentrations. Electron mobilities, at T = 1.5 K in the dark, of 310 nm deep 2DEGs before (squares) and after (circles) the growth of some ∼ 50 wafers in the: (a) `A' chamber and (b) `V' chamber. Experimental data taken from Ref. WendyPhD. Solid (red) lines are fits from the model in section III with the parameters listed in Table <ref>. The average background impurity concentration N_bi dropped from 3.3×10^14 /cm^3 in wafer A2460 to 1.3×10^14 /cm^3 in wafer A2513 in chamber `A', and from 1.3×10^14 /cm^3 in wafer V535 to 0.7×10^14 /cm^3 in wafer V581 in chamber `V'.
2012.14370
Fig13.jpg
0.478888
9f3fbfacb0ee42e4be03ac53bb342ccf
(color online) (a) Optical photograph of an ambipolar Hall bar with a semi-transparent 5 nm Ti topgate (in dark blue), with schematic of the circuit used for measurements.
2012.14370
Fig2.jpg
0.452315
a16e5f094d0a4c6fb29371e1e4a1f862
(color online) Heterostructure layout for theory model. The dashed red line indicates the location of the 2DEG (at z=0), at a depth d below the wafer surface. Interface roughness irregularities are shown, along with definitions for their separation distance Λ and average height Δ. The GaAs layer is treated as semi-infinite (towards the substrate), and the 10 nm GaAs cap layer [Fig. <ref>] is treated as part of the AlGaAs barrier.
2012.14370
Fig3.jpg
0.470009
75b71cdbc235437ca669387660de1d9d
(color online) (a) Reproducibility of mobility between two cooldowns of the same Hall bar, before illumination. (b) Reproducibility of mobility characteristics for two Hall bars from the same wafer before illumination. (c) Typical quantum Hall effect and Shubnikov-de-Haas oscillations before illumination, with visible quantized Hall plateaus at filling factors ν = 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8.
2012.14370
Fig4.jpg
0.488488
f0d5fb84dfdf4bf79bb4a7f1f13e3323
(color online) Electron density versus topgate voltage relationships n_2d(V_topgate), before (black squares) and after (red circles) illumination, typical of Hall bars from all wafers fabricated with a: (a) polyimide insulator, and (b) SiO_2 insulator. (c) In all wafers, after the initial 5 seconds, longer illuminations did not appear to cause further change in n_2d(V_topgate). (d) After illumination, electron mobility improves. Most of the change occurs during the first 5 seconds of illumination, with eventual saturation at longer illumination times.
2012.14370
Fig5.jpg
0.423307
8f778427d23545b78e695274a7a8ed62
(color online) Electron mobilities before (black squares) and after (red circles) illumination for: (a)-(d) Series I wafers and (e)-(h) Series II wafers. Series I (Series II) wafers with a polyimide (SiO_2) insulator were illuminated for 4 minutes (80 seconds). Solid lines are fits to the Boltzmann transport model described in section <ref>, equation (<ref>) and equations (<ref>)-(<ref>) with fit parameter values listed in Table <ref>. Dashed lines (red or black) in panel (d) are fits to equation (<ref>), describing transport near the 2D percolation threshold.
2012.14370
Fig6.jpg
0.387277
e213c2d90e4b41088ad06a33847a84fc
Stability with time of transport characteristics in sample J, after illumination performed at time t=0 hours. Between measurements, the topgate and the 2DEG were grounded. (a) Electron density versus time, at a fixed topgate voltage. For comparison, the densities before illumination are shown (closed symbols) at t=0, for V_topgate⩽ 5 V. Error bars due to measurement uncertainty in the density (±0.03%) are smaller than the symbols and are not shown. (b) Mobility versus time, at the same fixed topgate voltages as in panel (a), with the corresponding approximate density indicated. For comparison, the mobilities before illumination are shown (closed symbols) at t=0, interpolated from the curve fit in Fig. <ref>(g) at the same corresponding electron density. Error bars due to measurement uncertainty in the mobility (±0.2%) are smaller than the symbols and are not shown. In both panels, lines are guides to the eye.
2012.14370
Fig7.jpg
0.416005
963e63ed1bde4e7a9112749ec042dc11
Schematic of the bandstructure of a hypothetical Hall bar from a Series I wafer [see Fig. 1] with a SiO_2 gate dielectric at V_topgate=0 (not conducting): (a) before illumination, and (b) after illumination. Although the bandstructure has some curvature, it is at least 1,000× less pronounced than in intentionally modulation-doped 2DEGs. The gate dielectric and surface charge dominate the electric field [see section IV.B], and band bending due to charged background impurities is not visible at this scale. Processes discussed in the main text are shown.
2012.14370
Fig8.jpg
0.401238
89e230fe51fe42b1ba679b8ea7bd5e63
(color online) Electron density versus topgate voltage after multiple biased illuminations on: (a) shallow wafer G370, and (b) deep wafer G373. Symbols in all four panels are defined in panel (c), and are in the order of biased illuminations performed during the same cooldown, with `start' being the first. In all cases, the electron density versus topgate voltage relation is shifted by the voltage at which the biased illumination was performed. Note how the characteristics of the initial `0V' biased illumination (red `+' symbols) are recovered when another biased illumination at V_topgate = 0 V is performed (black `×' symbols) after three biased illuminations are performed at V_topgate = -2 V, -4 V, and -6 V. Electron mobilities after multiple biased illuminations are shown for a: (c) shallow wafer G370, and (d) deep wafer G373. For clarity, only a selection of biased illuminations are shown in these panels. The inset in panel (d) has the same axes and units as in the main figure; it is a magnified view of the data points near n_2d = 1.1 × 10^11 /cm^2.
2012.14370
Fig9.jpg