dedup-isc-ft-v107-score
float64
0.32
1
uid
stringlengths
32
32
text
stringlengths
0
32.5k
paper_id
stringlengths
1
14
original_image_filename
stringlengths
5
222
0.547388
83afa0d1767f4ac580a106c93c1ab0bd
The η distribution on both sides, for data (points) and simulation (line). In this data run tracks were approximately perpendicular to the surface of the detector; actually the asymmetry of the junction side distribution is due to a small inclination of the beam (∼ 0.3 deg.), reproduced in the simulation.
hep
ex0510012-eta_paper.jpg
0.53569
0286210f68054a0d824621feb0c8a99c
Simulated track by a MIP in the silicon detector with emission of a δ ray. The event is seen on two planes orthogonal to the strips of junction (left) and ohmic (right) sides. The black rectangles represent the read–out strips; the blank ones are the floating strips of the X, junction view.
hep
ex0510012-evplot_o.jpg
0.514007
147e1afcf1944c448c2faabcc67afca2
Behaviour of equipotential lines (solid) and electric field lines (dashed) in proximity of junction (top) and ohmic (bottom) sides of the sensor.
hep
ex0510012-laplace_xy.jpg
0.506057
55a571c96b944aa4af5e24e46a952ce6
Percentage of events with given multiplicity on both sides of the sensors (orthogonal MIP tracks from a test beam).
hep
ex0510012-multxy.jpg
0.480449
7327c745e8724e7aa06ec9f614d2ab64
Distributions of residuals for the η algorithm on junction (top) and ohmic (bottom) sides. The incidence angles of the particles are, from the left column to the right one, 0, 10, 20 deg.
hep
ex0510012-res_01020.jpg
0.453194
fdb99712919848b48c968d17f0910633
Spatial resolution obtained by some position finding algorithms as a function of the incidence angle on both junction and ohmic sides.
hep
ex0510012-rms_paper.jpg
0.521447
9c23a0a05a924a15aa669afde74fe240
Distribution of the differences calculated for data (thin line) and simulation (thick line) with orthogonal tracks in absence of magnetic field. The experimental set–up consisted of five non–uniformly spaced planes, arranged in a prototype telescope that acquired data on a test beam.
hep
ex0510012-sigma2000_j.jpg
0.432885
000c833359b244209443ca9d4e60a0ea
Distribution of the signal–to–noise ratio of the cluster for both X and Y sides of a ladder (orthogonal MIP tracks from a test beam).
hep
ex0510012-snxy.jpg
0.493035
9bef8e07f6534f709ecccba361ba3dab
Simulated distribution of residuals on the junction side for orthogonal tracks. Parameters p_1, …, p_4 are obtained from a fit with a generalized Lorentz distribution (eq. <ref>).
hep
ex0510012-xres.jpg
0.460478
7d11d3d2944c497ca8b2a85d86786295
Reconstructed mass distribution m(π^+π^-) - m(K^0_s ) of candidates.
hep
ex0510013-wa89theta_02.jpg
0.442713
2db149eb52544ebe8791b517ea345339
Invariant mass spectrum of all observed K^0_sp candidates. The upper plot shows an extended view of the region around 15402. The statistical errors are approximately of the size of the dots.
hep
ex0510013-wa89theta_03.jpg
0.410188
7c138b368b244b68b15a670a71c65471
distribution of for K^0_s p pairs in the mass range 15002<m(K^0_s p)<15602.
hep
ex0510013-wa89theta_04.jpg
0.403767
5c5660a2bf4d43109d6a73fadb34b5dd
The values of the t slope parameter b() as a function of in the range |t|<1.2 for a) photoproduction and b) electroproduction. ⟨⟩ indicates the bin centre value in the range considered. The data points are the results of one-dimensional fits of the form dσ/t∝ e^bt in bins. The inner error bars show the statistical errors, while the outer error bars show the statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature. The solid lines show the results of the two-dimensional fits (equation <ref>) as in figure <ref>. In a) the data are compared with results from the ZEUS collaboration <cit.>.
hep
ex0510016-Nbw.jpg
0.475562
171085389a9246ee80ab5b6e025ec92d
a) Total cross section for elastic production as a function of Q^2 in the range |t|<1.2 at =90. The inner error bars show the statistical errors, while the outer error bars show the statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature. The solid line is a fit to the H1 data of the form σ_∝ (M_ψ^2+Q^2)^-n. Data from the ZEUS experiment <cit.> are also shown. b) The ratio of the MRT calculations <cit.> to the fit from a). The MRT QCD predictions are based on different gluon distributions <cit.>. The curves are individually normalised to the measurements across the complete range yielding factors between 1.5 and 2.8. The shaded band represents the uncertainty of the fit result.
hep
ex0510016-Nqxsec.jpg
0.432909
96d943fed52b42b1b1fde88165ce9457
Reconstructed mass of the ω→π^0π^+π^- vs. p_⊥.
hep
ex0510017-mass_position.jpg
0.423315
a2e45cbf625a4e97b598bf7c010c2509
ω/π^0 vs. p_⊥ compared to IR and E706 measurements and PYTHIA predictions.
hep
ex0510017-omega_over_pi0.jpg
0.528495
6c10e121698a42b9927fee5a7bdc501b
Invariant yields of ω-meson at √(s_NN)=200 GeV. Insert shows K_S^0→π^0π^0 results.
hep
ex0510017-pt_spectra.jpg
0.486908
5503600cb04545368a3d7b993f79e72f
R^ω_dA vs. p_⊥ compared to the results other neutral mesons: R^η_dA, R^K_dA, and R^ϕ_CP.
hep
ex0510017-rda.jpg
0.426653
e5d10106400249ebb0c5ef1e0da2267d
Confidence level in the background hypothesis as a function of the Higgs boson mass. The solid curve is the observed confidence, the median expectation from background-only experiments is shown by the dashed line, and the bands represent the 68% and 95% confidence intervals.
hep
ex0510022-clb-tutti.jpg
0.402978
87d3a91681cc4082a2114be1ebff23b4
Exclusion regions in the (,)-plane, for 0.5 ≤ ≤ 1, 0.25 ≤ ≤ 0.5, and ≤ 0.25 from light to dark grey. The dashed lines indicate the borders where the h AA decay opens kinematically. The exclusions are given at the 95% CL.
hep
ex0510022-excludhafl.jpg
0.491378
2a8599c55f5b4555b2c978d8d1e1e409
measurements. For L BR the KLOE L has been used.
hep
ex0510028-allKloe.jpg
0.451753
70392cb600744f9aa648a00e03e96c6b
The ν_μ and the ν̅_μ fluxes obtained by optimizing the SPL for a Super Beam case ("SB Opt.") are compared to those obtained with a focusing system designed for a Neutrino Factory ("NF Opt.").
hep
ex0510029-OptiVsOldFlux.jpg
0.420743
8978dc479fd04781b9699f08515ec956
Comparison of the sensitivity contours with the new optimized setup and the original SPL design after 5 years of running with positive focusing.
hep
ex0510029-compareOldNewthetaDm.jpg
0.469752
ce73ae87bcbe433492f5f8bff063f02b
Comparison of the sensitivity on combined θ_13 and δ_CP after 5 years of positive focusing. The T2K sensitivity contour has been derived from reference <cit.>. No mass hierarchy nor octant hierarchy ambiguity has been considered.
hep
ex0510029-deltaThetaSens5yOldNew.jpg
0.446315
ec87ceb0f3104545827d4b7f8745bf76
The ratio R_2h as a function of z_2 for ^14N (squares), Kr (circles) and Xe (triangles) with z_1>0.5 for Selection II. The systematic uncertainty is 4% (3%) for xenon and krypton (nitrogen) and is independent of z_2. The curves (^14N: solid; Kr: dashed; Xe: dotted) are from the parton energy loss model described in Refs.<cit.>.
hep
ex0510030-r2h.allh.xpaper.jpg
0.432458
ad32be8c0a68407eae9924182a6cb2a4
The ratio R_2h as a function of z_2 for ^14N (squares), Kr (circles) and Xe (triangles) with z_1>0.5. Only Selection I was considered. The systematical uncertainty is 2% for all the targets and is independent of z_2. In the upper panel the curves (solid for ^14N, dashed for Kr, dotted for Xe) are calculated within a BUU transport model <cit.>. In the bottom panel the same data are shown with calculations that assume only absorption for the three nuclei (same line types as in the upper plot) <cit.>.
hep
ex0510030-r2h.xpaper.jpg
0.435893
4d12a7cca2d24e4c80ea78c0beb1c461
Comparison of the background subtracted data (points) and the signal MC (histograms) distributions of |cosΘ_γ^lγ|, |cosΘ^l_l^+| and Δϕ. Θ_γ^lγ is the polar angle of the photon in the l^+l^-γ rest frame, Θ^l_l^+ is the polar angle of the positive lepton in the l^+l^- rest frame, and Δϕ is the azimuthal angle difference between the momenta of the two leptons in the laboratory frame.
hep
ex0510033-3850905-012.jpg
0.449622
3c2775f3b4af428a981b0811a19c4de6
Scatter plot of the Δ M = M(γ l^+l^-)-M(l^+l^-) with respect to the two lepton effective mass in data. Top and bottom horizontal shaded bands are the areas defined as the J/ψ sideband regions, and the middle band is the area defined as the J/ψ signal region.
hep
ex0510033-3850905-013.jpg
0.485331
8265c14f9ec944c5a75abd410d4e7317
Δ M=M(γ l^+l^-)-M(l^+l^-) mass difference distributions for e^+e^- channel (a), μ^+μ^- channel (b), and the sum (c). The solid line curves are results of fit to the data points using the background indicated by the dashed line curves.
hep
ex0510033-3850905-014.jpg
0.464322
ce4858498c9e4670ba0fc7d04b4e4d80
Distributions of E/p (left) and p_tot^⊥ (right) in data (points) and in the signal MC (histograms). Vertical dashed lines indicate the E/p cuts for electrons and muons.
hep
ex0510033-3851105-018.jpg
0.376773
f3f78a2d550d4ce0af207186a723a634
Candidates for B̅^0→ρ^0γ, B^-→ρ^-γ, and B̅^0→ωγ (combined) in 386 million BB̅ events from Belle. The data are shown with all modes combined, for display purposes only.
hep
ex0510036-0506079_fig2d.jpg
0.4389
37f039001c3e41afb01f7f81ac879b0c
Babar <cit.>: Distributions in q^2 of (a) B→πℓν̅ and (b) B→ρℓν̅ from a neutrino reconstruction analysis. Data points are shown with error bars; theory references are ISGW2<cit.>, LCSR1<cit.>, LQCD1<cit.>, LQCD2<cit.>.
hep
ex0510036-0507003-fig03.jpg
0.459371
b9fa7e064ce847159d04b3d655e31405
Results in the context of the Unitarity Triangle: Superposition of global fit to ρ and η after Winter 2005 conferences <cit.> and ± 1σ zones (black lines) from Summer 2005 measurements of sin2ϕ_1, |V_td| presented here (arcs centered at (1,0)), and |V_ub| presented here (arcs centered at (0,0)). As can be seen, the 1σ zone from constraints on |V_ub| is of comparable size to that from constraints on sin2ϕ_1.
hep
ex0510036-rhoeta_ckmfit.jpg
0.518244
a82a2f65717d4acfb9f72324eb2d7845
Measurement of the double-differential π^+ production cross-section in the laboratory system d^2σ/(dpdΩ) for incoming protons of 12.9 on an aluminium target as a function of pion momentum p, in bins of pion polar angle θ. The data points are the measurements, the histogram represents the Sanford-Wang parametrization fitted to the data.
hep
ex0510039-harpswfit_Al5_129.jpg
0.479596
aa264f24b3b747f29b1311cc7aa6d3f5
Projections of the differential light hadron production cross-section as a function of p integrated over the range 30 ≤θ < 210 mrad (left panel), and production cross-section as a function of θ in the range 0.75 ≤ p < 6.5 (right panel). The points show the HARP measurements, the dotted curve the best-fit Sanford-Wang parametrization.
hep
ex0510039-harpswfit_Al5_129_1dimproj.jpg
0.553001
369b943501a749c5a3ce3f1a662d7774
The Wess-Zumino-Witten Lagrangian expanded in terms of the triangle and box anomaly.
hep
ex0510040-LWZW.jpg
0.454335
9e7d214a8bc447d5834b1292d565a6c2
Cross section to the WASA detector. The different components are discussed in the text.
hep
ex0510040-WASA.jpg
0.438646
4bfdf75b85b44f78a2367e5a796d472d
The slope parameter α from various measurements and calculations. The references are given in <cit.> except for the preliminary results.
hep
ex0510040-alpha.jpg
0.571476
9aa5fe224d8348d0a959de00482e204d
The results of the η-mass measurements, in order of publication date, taken from the Rutherford Laboratory (RL) <cit.>, SATURNE <cit.>, MAMI <cit.>, NA48 <cit.>, and GEM <cit.>. When two error bars are shown, the smaller is statistical and the larger total.
hep
ex0510040-gem3.jpg
0.416494
0761247296434279a71000479b74614a
Excitation functions of the total cross sections for pp→η pp (circles) and pp→η 'pp reactions (squares). The different curves are discussed in the text.
hep
ex0510040-pp2pp_eta.jpg
0.487715
ee21fecc2874488b9f7c0543722706a5
The ratio of the two OZI rule related reactions as function of the excess energy.
hep
ex0510040-pp_OZI.jpg
0.511973
adf707fee48d4ff4ab3b639da2de0309
The ratio of associated strangeness production as function of the excess energy.
hep
ex0510040-sigma2lambda_Cosy11.jpg
0.501758
887df3b2ff2949feb1a32a70f1a691b1
Comparison of the measured pn excitation energy spectrum on a linear scale with the prediction the singlet cross section folded with the present resolution. The error bars contain a tiny contribution from the uncertainty in the acceptance correction.
hep
ex0510040-singlet.jpg
0.46515
c9327f6288df4a76a6657f3a95b1dd16
The distribution of the pK_S^0 invariant mass for combinations satisfying the criteria described in the text. The same data are plotted for the full kinematically-allowed pK_S^0 mass range and, in the inset, with statistical uncertainties and a suppressed zero on the vertical scale, for the mass range in which the has been reported.
hep
ex0510041-0502004-fig01.jpg
0.449536
f82d1e18909c4317b2fec18d6dbc987d
Compilation of meson and baryon production rates in e^+e^- annihilation <cit.> from experiments at the Z^0 (gray) and √(s)≈ 10(black) as a function of baryon mass. The vertical scale accounts for the number of spin and particle+antiparticle states, and the lines are chosen to guide the eye. The arrows indicate our upper limits on spin-1/2 Θ^+ and Ξ_5^– pentaquark states, assuming the branching fractions shown, and are seen to lie below the solid line.
hep
ex0510044-Bary-prodTry.jpg
0.432295
75c0218ca4f849ab8b2516186c1f46d5
Slope parameter of the multiple interaction correction for R_jet=0.7 versus instantaneous luminosity in W→ e ν, minimum bias, as well as in a jet sample with E_T threshold of 100 GeV.
hep
ex0510047-Stability_with_Lum.jpg
0.451332
1983d2e483a0432f82777c86d120684d
Absolute corrections for different cone sizes as a function of calorimeter jet p_T. The solid line shows the corrections for cone size 0.4, the dashed for 0.7 and the dotted for 1.0.
hep
ex0510047-abs.jpg
0.443491
0b3cad53e306405c8e5bb65b86d2dfa7
Systematic uncertainty on the jet energy scale due to the calorimeter calibration and simulation. The solid line shows the total uncertainty and the other lines show individual contributions.
hep
ex0510047-abssys.jpg
0.440301
7cd75712d57049749226f34f3ea86bfa
Top left: Energy observed in CHA for particles that do not interact in the CEM. Total (top right), CEM (bottom right) and CHA (bottom left) energy for charged pions with p=57 GeV/c. The test beam data (points) are compared to the CDF simulation (solid line).
hep
ex0510047-calor_pi57.jpg
0.473102
ce3a8af2d62646e5bbf82b63b7ba730c
Elevation view of one half of the CDF detector displaying the components of the CDF calorimeter: CEM, CHA, WHA, PEM and PHA.
hep
ex0510047-calor_pic1.jpg
0.436117
92dc6502122444009bc641b69df24b71
Top: Jet response R_ave for data (closed circles), PYTHIA (open circles) and HERWIG (open triangles) for R_jet=0.4 jets as function of p_T^jet. Bottom: Difference between data and PYTHIA (open circles) and data and HERWIG (open triangles).
hep
ex0510047-closs.jpg
0.379482
c33639c4c0e34edd98b6365c19d03bed
β_dijet for particle jets as a function of jet η_jet for PYTHIA (open circles) and HERWIG (open triangles) for p̂_T>18 GeV/c and for R_jet=0.4.
hep
ex0510047-dijet_hadron04.jpg
0.44229
4575fe6123c84114a673517800b25726
⟨ E/p ⟩ vs. ϕ_rel for particles with momenta between 3 and 5 GeV/c (left) and for particles with momenta between 12 and 16 GeV/c (right). Top: data (full points) and MC (open squares). Bottom: difference between data and MC.
hep
ex0510047-eophad.jpg
0.453144
df41d0c62de24b4b94d6ccfd4fc14ede
⟨ E/p ⟩ versus p for electrons and positrons from J/ψ→ e^+ e^- and W→ e^±ν_e data (closed triangles and circles) and MC samples (open triangles and circles) samples.
hep
ex0510047-eopvsp_em.jpg
0.472395
3ebb952149064782943f35891346c8b3
Mean energy observed in the CHA/WHA for CMUP and CMX muons with p_T>20 GeV/c from W→μν_μ candidate events versus run number. The CMUP muons are confined to |η|<0.6 and thus only sensitive to the central part of the CHA. The CMX muons cover the region 0.6<|η|<1.0 and probe the outer part of the CHA plus the innermost part of the WHA. The dashed lines indicate a 1.5% uncertainty.
hep
ex0510047-hadevsrun.jpg
0.447399
d46f1030aabc41908057dbf348d87bbe
Difference between ⟨ E/p ⟩ of data and MC versus particle momentum p. Shown is the difference for minimum bias Data and MC (squares), single track data and MC (circles) and test beam data and MC (triangles). The dashed lines indicate the quoted systematic uncertainties. The error bars on the minimum bias and single track data are statistical. For the test beam data we do not display any uncertainty.
hep
ex0510047-nim_central_ratio.jpg
0.467465
7278c37834e64d2f9cc29c147418b9bb
Fractional energy observed in the central calorimeter as a function of incident particle momenta. The top row shows ⟨ E_CEM/p ⟩, ⟨ E_CHA/p ⟩ and ⟨ (E_CEM+E_CHA)/p ⟩ for data signal (triangles) and background (histogram) and for single track MC simulation (open circles). The bottom row shows the same distributions for data after background subtraction (full circles) and MC simulation (open circles).
hep
ex0510047-nim_track.jpg
0.545734
82357cd2a9d144b0937dd52e1f2ec680
Δ p_T= - for R_jet=0.4 jets matched using Δ R< 0.1 for different bins.
hep
ex0510047-ny_2.jpg
0.538029
a214277855f64d25b7de567da9f00adf
OOC correction, C_OOC versus p_T^parton/p_T^particle, versus p_T^particle for cone sizes 0.4 (solid line), 0.7 (dashed line) and 1.0 (dotted line).
hep
ex0510047-ooc_corr.jpg
0.442704
0d7e61180a2449a3bcfe622638b92df4
Normalized distributions of the momentum in different annuli outside the jet cone for data, PYTHIA and HERWIG γ+jets events.
hep
ex0510047-ooc_r1r2.jpg
0.480935
fad5ca91737e48ddb72409db7e16a6b2
Systematic uncertainty of OOC corrections for different cone sizes. The systematic uncertainty is taken as the largest difference between data and either PYTHIA or HERWIG and multiplied by the particle-jet/calorimeter-jet factors.
hep
ex0510047-oocsys.jpg
0.469695
6222222554d34beabf239ab42b2e0270
p_T balance, p_T^jet/p_T^γ-1, in data (full circles), PYTHIA (open circles) and HERWIG (open triangles) as function of η_jet for R_jet=0.4
hep
ex0510047-ptbal_l1.jpg
0.529774
9a9a81366cdf4624bf0a30fca439d3d5
γ-jet balance in data, PYTHIA and HERWIG for R_jet=0.4. Overlaid is the corresponding γ-jet balance on particle level jets (triangles) calculated using particles at generator level without detector simulation. The distributions are normalized to 1.
hep
ex0510047-ptbal_l5.jpg
0.534004
1a5105f4875d46a39eb0a694789a01a3
γ-jet balance in data, PYTHIA and HERWIG using R_jet=0.4, 0.7 and 1.0 after η-dependent, absolute and OOC+UE corrections.
hep
ex0510047-ptbal_l7.jpg
0.454367
fdb0becbb1d640cfab7318a610326daa
Difference of the γ-jet balance between data and HERWIG as a function of p_T^γ in six regions of η_jet. All three cone sizes are shown: 0.4 (blue squares), 0.7 (red open circles) and 1.0 (black triangles). The curves indicate the total systematic uncertainty in each η region.
hep
ex0510047-ptbal_sys_hg.jpg
0.44613
c9f8917770e14a0eae7b6fdd239970c3
Difference of the γ-jet balance between data and PYTHIA as a function of p_T^γ in six regions of η_jet. All three cone sizes are shown: 0.4 (blue squares), 0.7 (red open circles) and 1.0 (black triangles). The curves indicate the total systematic uncertainty in each η region.
hep
ex0510047-ptbal_sys_py.jpg
0.408732
7c211fe5f9344117b998b670bae4e073
Dijet balance, β_dijet=p_T^probe/p_T^trigger, as a function of η_jet in data, HERWIG and PYTHIA MC samples for R_jet=0.4 jets. Shown are the corrections for jet-20, jet-50, jet-70 and jet-100 jet samples, corresponding to 25<p_T^ave<55 GeV/c, 55<p_T^ave<75 GeV/c, 75<p_T^ave<105 GeV/c and p_T^ave>105 GeV/c, respectively. The lines show the interpolation between the individual measurements used for correcting jets.
hep
ex0510047-rel04.jpg
0.402695
cc7b40c8803b49cfb866be75f63acb00
Dijet balance, β_dijet=p_T^probe/p_T^trigger, as a function of η_jet in data, HERWIG and PYTHIA MC samples for R_jet=0.7 jets. Shown are the corrections for jet-20, jet-50, jet-70 and jet-100 jet samples, corresponding to 25<p_T^ave<55 GeV/c, 55<p_T^ave<75 GeV/c, 75<p_T^ave<105 GeV/c and p_T^ave>105 GeV/c, respectively. The lines show the interpolation between the individual measurements used for correcting jets.
hep
ex0510047-rel07.jpg
0.407579
928eac28930644a38d50827f73ad12c3
Dijet balance, β_dijet=p_T^probe/p_T^trigger, as a function of η_jet in data, HERWIG and PYTHIA MC samples for R_jet=1.0 jets. Shown are the corrections for the jet-20, jet-50, jet-70 and jet-100 jet samples, corresponding to 25<p_T^ave<55 GeV/c, 55<p_T^ave<75 GeV/c, 75<p_T^ave<105 GeV/c and p_T^ave>105 GeV/c, respectively. The lines show the interpolation between the individual measurements used for correcting jets.
hep
ex0510047-rel10.jpg
0.443109
003a9605da0a4ec0a6743707954cc08b
Dijet balance, β_dijet=p_T^probe/p_T^trigger, as a function of η_jet in data and PYTHIA MC samples for cone size R_jet=0.4 after applying the η-dependent corrections. Shown are the jet-20 (top left), jet-50 (top right), jet-70 (bottom left) and jet-100 (bottom right) jet samples, corresponding to 25<p_T^ave<55 GeV/c, 55<p_T^ave<75 GeV/c, 75<p_T^ave<105 GeV/c and p_T^ave>105 GeV/c, respectively.
hep
ex0510047-relcor04.jpg
0.420845
22d104990cc74d5f99cd5693418be240
Dijet balance, β_dijet=p_T^probe/p_T^trigger, as a function of η_jet in data and PYTHIA MC samples for cone size R_jet=0.7 after applying the η-dependent corrections. Shown are the jet-20 (top left), jet-50 (top right), jet-70 (bottom left) and jet-100 (bottom right) jet samples, corresponding to 25<p_T^ave<55 GeV/c, 55<p_T^ave<75 GeV/c, 75<p_T^ave<105 GeV/c and p_T^ave>105 GeV/c, respectively.
hep
ex0510047-relcor07.jpg
0.423941
8b6a4e53eef248fd86973e3e20106d53
Dijet balance, β_dijet=p_T^probe/p_T^trigger, as a function of η_jet in data and PYTHIA MC samples for cone size R_jet=1.0 after applying the η-dependent corrections. Shown are the jet-20 (top left), jet-50 (top right), jet-70 (bottom left) and jet-100 (bottom right) jet samples, corresponding to 25<p_T^ave<55 GeV/c, 55<p_T^ave<75 GeV/c, 75<p_T^ave<105 GeV/c and p_T^ave>105 GeV/c, respectively.
hep
ex0510047-relcor10.jpg
0.462577
d6826e06c1ac4f82bd923cb0a3247ee1
Comparison of the particle momentum spectra in dijet events between data with PYTHIA and HERWIG. The CDF data have been corrected for track reconstruction efficiency.
hep
ex0510047-simon_p.jpg
0.466817
0a795c65c8364d399dfbf9eb22b9578f
Systematic uncertainties as a function of the corrected jet p_T in 0.2<|η|<0.6.
hep
ex0510047-tot_sys.jpg
0.402944
6d6a8faeef6b43c085dc15c5b544c999
The average transverse momentum of charged particles in the transverse region as described in the text versus leading jet p_T <cit.> calculated using tracks in R_jet=0.7. The data are shown as points and are compared to the predictions from PYTHIA (dashed-dotted line), HERWIG (solid line) and ISAJET (dashed line).
hep
ex0510047-ue.jpg
0.529225
0db5bfa1854d4aa4b67918760ed98001
Z-jet balance in data (closed black circles), PYTHIA (solid red line) and HERWIG (dashed blue line) for R_jet=0.4 (top left), R_jet=0.7 (top right) and R_jet=1.0 (bottom left) after all corrections.
hep
ex0510047-zjets.jpg
0.421991
f74230212dd94ae88d8e7d6c2df9187e
Mean invariant mass of Z→ e^+e^- candidates, ⟨ M(ee) ⟩, versus run number for events with 86<M(ee)<98 GeV/c^2. Shown are the values for events with both electrons in the central calorimeter (full circles) and for events with one electron in the central and one in the plug calorimeter (open circles). The dashed lines indicate a ± 0.3% uncertainty around 91.1 GeV/c^2.
hep
ex0510047-zmassvrun.jpg
0.499254
0030ae31a88e45b1a4960ff055ca2c4e
The systematic uncertainties on jet energy are shown for jets in the central calorimeter (0.2<|η|<0.6). For non-central jets, the total uncertainty has a different contribution from the eta-dependent uncertainty. In this plot the corrected jet transverse momentum ^corr is the process-independent estimate of the parton . At low ^corr, the main contribution to the systematic is from the uncertainty on the fraction of jet energy lost outside the cone, while at high ^corr it is from the linearity corrections to obtain an absolute jet energy scale.
hep
ex0510048-05081917_TotSys.jpg
0.501158
50024ef3a7bb454086bc5bd3afdf2938
For γ-jet events in both data and simulation, we find the fractional difference in between the jet and the photon after all jet corrections are applied. Plotted here, for different ranges of jet η, is the difference between this quantity in data and simulated events as a function of photon . The solid lines show the ±1 range given by the jet energy systematics. The other lines follow the same definitions as in f:totalJetSyst.
hep
ex0510048-05101011_gammajet.jpg
0.408407
b85dbf583fd74d27a4b0f419737b53cf
The distribution of the reconstructed b jets
hep
ex0510048-Bjet_ttopdh_comp-all_318.jpg
0.442739
9c1a5d5a168244219989d7bc796ed953
The rapidity distribution of the reconstructed top quarks
hep
ex0510048-Eta_top_ttopdh_comp-all_318.jpg
0.396308
b425e881de4e4df1b774054cf1a76779
The number of jets distribution Jets are required to have >8 and |η|<2.0.
hep
ex0510048-Njets_ttopdh_comp-all_318.jpg
0.400857
3ea7da49af514e2db6ad4246a4916621
The distribution of the reconstructed top quarks
hep
ex0510048-Pt_top_ttopdh_comp-all_318.jpg
0.438959
d1d09eddcaf24022a53400ba8dfefe9a
The distribution of the reconstructed system
hep
ex0510048-Pt_ttbar_ttopdh_comp-all_318.jpg
0.412343
f0e29e2ed65543d6a9aab9f0302c23c8
The distribution of the reconstructed W bosons
hep
ex0510048-Pt_w_ttopdh_comp-all_318.jpg
0.501493
293c5728493d43fc9ac5560f85a4e7a0
The efficiency of the secondary vertex b-tagging algorithm is shown as a function of jet for b jets in the central region of the detector (|η|<1), where the tracking efficiency is high. The shaded band gives the ±1 range for b-tagging efficiency. The curve is measured using a combination of data and Monte Carlo simulated samples.
hep
ex0510048-btageff_prd.jpg
0.488594
41171f4e95fb4efdbec3fe5f57efceef
An elevation view of the CDF detector. From the collision region outwards, CDF consists of a silicon strip detector, a tracking drift chamber, an electromagnetic calorimeter, a hadronic calorimeter, and muon chambers.
hep
ex0510048-cdfelev2.jpg
0.455296
3b33157e0bc141c3b733c32a552dfb7c
The reconstructed top quark mass distribution for the 18 events with one secondary vertex tag and one JPB tag, overlaid with the expected distribution from the fit to this subsample. The inset shows the shape of - Δ log L for the fit to these events as a function of the top quark mass.
hep
ex0510048-cfinal_5.jpg
0.408268
16eaf32df68148efb9ea9e785a0fcd18
The distribution is shown for data events and for signal and background simulated events in the expected ratio. Distributions are shown for (upper left), (upper right), (lower left), and (lower right) events.
hep
ex0510048-chi2_comp_prd.jpg
0.417332
5764e2abe54341ca9c867586a6a3d8f4
The reconstructed dijet mass distribution for each subsample is shown overlaid with the expected distribution using the top quark mass, jet energy scale, signal normalization, and background normalization from the combined fit.
hep
ex0510048-datafit_mjj_prd.jpg
0.419611
5f8e9439296d40e8a942daf43fea23a7
The reconstructed top quark mass distribution for each subsample is shown overlaid with the expected distribution using the top quark mass, jet energy scale, signal normalization, and background normalization from the combined fit.
hep
ex0510048-datafit_mt_prd.jpg
0.453658
0cc2e4681b9b41949dacecccccf1b89f
The light histograms show the reconstructed top quark mass distribution for the 178 herwig sample at the nominal jet energy scale. Overlaid are darker histograms of the reconstructed mass distributions using the subset of events for which the leading four jets are matched (within Δ R=0.4) to the four quarks from the decay and the correct jet-quark assignment has the lowest . Distributions are shown for (upper left), (upper right), (lower left), and (lower right) events.
hep
ex0510048-defaulttopsigtemp_prd.jpg
0.480237
ba6fc4a5697e47f89f219d2894738036
The reconstructed dijet mass distributions for the 178herwig sample at the nominal jet energy scale. Overlaid are darker histograms of the reconstructed mass distributions using the subset of events for which the leading four jets include two jets matched (within Δ R=0.4) to the two quarks from the hadronic W decay, and plotting just the invariant mass of those two jets. Distributions are shown for (upper left), (upper right), (lower left), and (lower right) events.
hep
ex0510048-defaultwsigtemp_prd.jpg
0.423409
319ba47b8f3247deb2b53e6660a73a1b
Results of the dijet balancing procedure are shown for data and simulated dijet events with >20. Probe jets from throughout the detector are compared with a reference jet in the central region; the ratio of the of the jets is plotted as a function of the probe jet η. The simulation models well the detector response as a function of η.
hep
ex0510048-dijetbal.jpg
0.467217
1681444c759b4d4e85658dce111ea43d
The contours of the likelihood in the -plane for the combined fit to all four subsamples. At each point in the plane, the likelihood is maximized with respect to the other free parameters. The crosshair shows the best fit point, and contours are given at at regular intervals in Δln L, the change in log-likelihood from its maximum.
hep
ex0510048-likelihoodcontour2d_1_prd_v2.jpg
0.500974
7f514a9c1e3f4eb9afdff5ed70f860a1
The distributions of positive and negative uncertainties from the likelihood fit are shown, for pseudo-experiments generated with a top quark mass of 172.5, the nominal jet energy scale, and the number of events in each subsample as observed in the data. Arrows indicate the positive and negative uncertainties from the likelihood fit to the data; 9.2% of the pseudo-experiments have smaller uncertainties.
hep
ex0510048-mtop_expect_uncert_prd.jpg
0.441759
bd0d1f82038a4350977eb59a245e83b2
The templates for W and Wc background processes are compared to the high-statistics W template for all tagged events. The agreement is good in both cases, so the W template is used to represent all W + h.f. processes.
hep
ex0510048-mtop_wbb-cc-c_prd.jpg
0.389804
8067f54c53f84b1aa9bf9918eed35e75
Top quark mass measurements using the -only fit are compared for different assumptions (top-specific corrections (default) vs generic jet out-of-cone corrections, constrained backgrounds vs unconstrained) and different ways of subdividing the sample (two different run periods, electrons vs muons, positive-charge leptons vs negative-charge leptons). All results with only statistical errors are consistent.
hep
ex0510048-prd_xcheck1.jpg
0.39593
290ebbb2dcc242ce869e7d92168439d6
Top quark mass measurements using the -only fit are compared for various samples. From top to bottom: all four subsamples; , , and subsamples; and subsamples only; and subsamples only, additional jets <15; and subsamples only, additional jets <8. All results with only statistical errors are found to be consistent.
hep
ex0510048-prd_xcheck2.jpg
0.464178
4a15b017c3de4b27a6cb37c281096477
The average of the dilepton system, which corresponds to the level of ISR activity, shows a logarithmic dependence on the dilepton invariant mass M_ll^2. The data are compared with the predictions of pythia 6.2 and of the +1σ_ISR and -1σ_ISR samples.
hep
ex0510048-pt_evol_gen_corr_v4_prd.jpg