dedup-isc-ft-v107-score
float64 0.32
1
| uid
stringlengths 32
32
| text
stringlengths 0
32.5k
| paper_id
stringlengths 1
14
| original_image_filename
stringlengths 5
222
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
0.547388 | 83afa0d1767f4ac580a106c93c1ab0bd | The η distribution on both sides, for data (points) and simulation (line). In this data run tracks were approximately perpendicular to the surface of the detector; actually the asymmetry of the junction side distribution is due to a small inclination of the beam (∼ 0.3 deg.), reproduced in the simulation. | hep | ex0510012-eta_paper.jpg |
0.53569 | 0286210f68054a0d824621feb0c8a99c | Simulated track by a MIP in the silicon detector with emission of a δ ray. The event is seen on two planes orthogonal to the strips of junction (left) and ohmic (right) sides. The black rectangles represent the read–out strips; the blank ones are the floating strips of the X, junction view. | hep | ex0510012-evplot_o.jpg |
0.514007 | 147e1afcf1944c448c2faabcc67afca2 | Behaviour of equipotential lines (solid) and electric field lines (dashed) in proximity of junction (top) and ohmic (bottom) sides of the sensor. | hep | ex0510012-laplace_xy.jpg |
0.506057 | 55a571c96b944aa4af5e24e46a952ce6 | Percentage of events with given multiplicity on both sides of the sensors (orthogonal MIP tracks from a test beam). | hep | ex0510012-multxy.jpg |
0.480449 | 7327c745e8724e7aa06ec9f614d2ab64 | Distributions of residuals for the η algorithm on junction (top) and ohmic (bottom) sides. The incidence angles of the particles are, from the left column to the right one, 0, 10, 20 deg. | hep | ex0510012-res_01020.jpg |
0.453194 | fdb99712919848b48c968d17f0910633 | Spatial resolution obtained by some position finding algorithms as a function of the incidence angle on both junction and ohmic sides. | hep | ex0510012-rms_paper.jpg |
0.521447 | 9c23a0a05a924a15aa669afde74fe240 | Distribution of the differences calculated for data (thin line) and simulation (thick line) with orthogonal tracks in absence of magnetic field. The experimental set–up consisted of five non–uniformly spaced planes, arranged in a prototype telescope that acquired data on a test beam. | hep | ex0510012-sigma2000_j.jpg |
0.432885 | 000c833359b244209443ca9d4e60a0ea | Distribution of the signal–to–noise ratio of the cluster for both X and Y sides of a ladder (orthogonal MIP tracks from a test beam). | hep | ex0510012-snxy.jpg |
0.493035 | 9bef8e07f6534f709ecccba361ba3dab | Simulated distribution of residuals on the junction side for orthogonal tracks. Parameters p_1, …, p_4 are obtained from a fit with a generalized Lorentz distribution (eq. <ref>). | hep | ex0510012-xres.jpg |
0.460478 | 7d11d3d2944c497ca8b2a85d86786295 | Reconstructed mass distribution m(π^+π^-) - m(K^0_s ) of candidates. | hep | ex0510013-wa89theta_02.jpg |
0.442713 | 2db149eb52544ebe8791b517ea345339 | Invariant mass spectrum of all observed K^0_sp candidates. The upper plot shows an extended view of the region around 15402. The statistical errors are approximately of the size of the dots. | hep | ex0510013-wa89theta_03.jpg |
0.410188 | 7c138b368b244b68b15a670a71c65471 | distribution of for K^0_s p pairs in the mass range 15002<m(K^0_s p)<15602. | hep | ex0510013-wa89theta_04.jpg |
0.403767 | 5c5660a2bf4d43109d6a73fadb34b5dd | The values of the t slope parameter b() as a function of in the range |t|<1.2 for a) photoproduction and b) electroproduction. ⟨⟩ indicates the bin centre value in the range considered. The data points are the results of one-dimensional fits of the form dσ/t∝ e^bt in bins. The inner error bars show the statistical errors, while the outer error bars show the statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature. The solid lines show the results of the two-dimensional fits (equation <ref>) as in figure <ref>. In a) the data are compared with results from the ZEUS collaboration <cit.>. | hep | ex0510016-Nbw.jpg |
0.475562 | 171085389a9246ee80ab5b6e025ec92d | a) Total cross section for elastic production as a function of Q^2 in the range |t|<1.2 at =90. The inner error bars show the statistical errors, while the outer error bars show the statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature. The solid line is a fit to the H1 data of the form σ_∝ (M_ψ^2+Q^2)^-n. Data from the ZEUS experiment <cit.> are also shown. b) The ratio of the MRT calculations <cit.> to the fit from a). The MRT QCD predictions are based on different gluon distributions <cit.>. The curves are individually normalised to the measurements across the complete range yielding factors between 1.5 and 2.8. The shaded band represents the uncertainty of the fit result. | hep | ex0510016-Nqxsec.jpg |
0.432909 | 96d943fed52b42b1b1fde88165ce9457 | Reconstructed mass of the ω→π^0π^+π^- vs. p_⊥. | hep | ex0510017-mass_position.jpg |
0.423315 | a2e45cbf625a4e97b598bf7c010c2509 | ω/π^0 vs. p_⊥ compared to IR and E706 measurements and PYTHIA predictions. | hep | ex0510017-omega_over_pi0.jpg |
0.528495 | 6c10e121698a42b9927fee5a7bdc501b | Invariant yields of ω-meson at √(s_NN)=200 GeV. Insert shows K_S^0→π^0π^0 results. | hep | ex0510017-pt_spectra.jpg |
0.486908 | 5503600cb04545368a3d7b993f79e72f | R^ω_dA vs. p_⊥ compared to the results other neutral mesons: R^η_dA, R^K_dA, and R^ϕ_CP. | hep | ex0510017-rda.jpg |
0.426653 | e5d10106400249ebb0c5ef1e0da2267d | Confidence level in the background hypothesis as a function of the Higgs boson mass. The solid curve is the observed confidence, the median expectation from background-only experiments is shown by the dashed line, and the bands represent the 68% and 95% confidence intervals. | hep | ex0510022-clb-tutti.jpg |
0.402978 | 87d3a91681cc4082a2114be1ebff23b4 | Exclusion regions in the (,)-plane, for 0.5 ≤ ≤ 1, 0.25 ≤ ≤ 0.5, and ≤ 0.25 from light to dark grey. The dashed lines indicate the borders where the h AA decay opens kinematically. The exclusions are given at the 95% CL. | hep | ex0510022-excludhafl.jpg |
0.491378 | 2a8599c55f5b4555b2c978d8d1e1e409 | measurements. For L BR the KLOE L has been used. | hep | ex0510028-allKloe.jpg |
0.451753 | 70392cb600744f9aa648a00e03e96c6b | The ν_μ and the ν̅_μ fluxes obtained by optimizing the SPL for a Super Beam case ("SB Opt.") are compared to those obtained with a focusing system designed for a Neutrino Factory ("NF Opt."). | hep | ex0510029-OptiVsOldFlux.jpg |
0.420743 | 8978dc479fd04781b9699f08515ec956 | Comparison of the sensitivity contours with the new optimized setup and the original SPL design after 5 years of running with positive focusing. | hep | ex0510029-compareOldNewthetaDm.jpg |
0.469752 | ce73ae87bcbe433492f5f8bff063f02b | Comparison of the sensitivity on combined θ_13 and δ_CP after 5 years of positive focusing. The T2K sensitivity contour has been derived from reference <cit.>. No mass hierarchy nor octant hierarchy ambiguity has been considered. | hep | ex0510029-deltaThetaSens5yOldNew.jpg |
0.446315 | ec87ceb0f3104545827d4b7f8745bf76 | The ratio R_2h as a function of z_2 for ^14N (squares), Kr (circles) and Xe (triangles) with z_1>0.5 for Selection II. The systematic uncertainty is 4% (3%) for xenon and krypton (nitrogen) and is independent of z_2. The curves (^14N: solid; Kr: dashed; Xe: dotted) are from the parton energy loss model described in Refs.<cit.>. | hep | ex0510030-r2h.allh.xpaper.jpg |
0.432458 | ad32be8c0a68407eae9924182a6cb2a4 | The ratio R_2h as a function of z_2 for ^14N (squares), Kr (circles) and Xe (triangles) with z_1>0.5. Only Selection I was considered. The systematical uncertainty is 2% for all the targets and is independent of z_2. In the upper panel the curves (solid for ^14N, dashed for Kr, dotted for Xe) are calculated within a BUU transport model <cit.>. In the bottom panel the same data are shown with calculations that assume only absorption for the three nuclei (same line types as in the upper plot) <cit.>. | hep | ex0510030-r2h.xpaper.jpg |
0.435893 | 4d12a7cca2d24e4c80ea78c0beb1c461 | Comparison of the background subtracted data (points) and the signal MC (histograms) distributions of |cosΘ_γ^lγ|, |cosΘ^l_l^+| and Δϕ. Θ_γ^lγ is the polar angle of the photon in the l^+l^-γ rest frame, Θ^l_l^+ is the polar angle of the positive lepton in the l^+l^- rest frame, and Δϕ is the azimuthal angle difference between the momenta of the two leptons in the laboratory frame. | hep | ex0510033-3850905-012.jpg |
0.449622 | 3c2775f3b4af428a981b0811a19c4de6 | Scatter plot of the Δ M = M(γ l^+l^-)-M(l^+l^-) with respect to the two lepton effective mass in data. Top and bottom horizontal shaded bands are the areas defined as the J/ψ sideband regions, and the middle band is the area defined as the J/ψ signal region. | hep | ex0510033-3850905-013.jpg |
0.485331 | 8265c14f9ec944c5a75abd410d4e7317 | Δ M=M(γ l^+l^-)-M(l^+l^-) mass difference distributions for e^+e^- channel (a), μ^+μ^- channel (b), and the sum (c). The solid line curves are results of fit to the data points using the background indicated by the dashed line curves. | hep | ex0510033-3850905-014.jpg |
0.464322 | ce4858498c9e4670ba0fc7d04b4e4d80 | Distributions of E/p (left) and p_tot^⊥ (right) in data (points) and in the signal MC (histograms). Vertical dashed lines indicate the E/p cuts for electrons and muons. | hep | ex0510033-3851105-018.jpg |
0.376773 | f3f78a2d550d4ce0af207186a723a634 | Candidates for B̅^0→ρ^0γ, B^-→ρ^-γ, and B̅^0→ωγ (combined) in 386 million BB̅ events from Belle. The data are shown with all modes combined, for display purposes only. | hep | ex0510036-0506079_fig2d.jpg |
0.4389 | 37f039001c3e41afb01f7f81ac879b0c | Babar <cit.>: Distributions in q^2 of (a) B→πℓν̅ and (b) B→ρℓν̅ from a neutrino reconstruction analysis. Data points are shown with error bars; theory references are ISGW2<cit.>, LCSR1<cit.>, LQCD1<cit.>, LQCD2<cit.>. | hep | ex0510036-0507003-fig03.jpg |
0.459371 | b9fa7e064ce847159d04b3d655e31405 | Results in the context of the Unitarity Triangle: Superposition of global fit to ρ and η after Winter 2005 conferences <cit.> and ± 1σ zones (black lines) from Summer 2005 measurements of sin2ϕ_1, |V_td| presented here (arcs centered at (1,0)), and |V_ub| presented here (arcs centered at (0,0)). As can be seen, the 1σ zone from constraints on |V_ub| is of comparable size to that from constraints on sin2ϕ_1. | hep | ex0510036-rhoeta_ckmfit.jpg |
0.518244 | a82a2f65717d4acfb9f72324eb2d7845 | Measurement of the double-differential π^+ production cross-section in the laboratory system d^2σ/(dpdΩ) for incoming protons of 12.9 on an aluminium target as a function of pion momentum p, in bins of pion polar angle θ. The data points are the measurements, the histogram represents the Sanford-Wang parametrization fitted to the data. | hep | ex0510039-harpswfit_Al5_129.jpg |
0.479596 | aa264f24b3b747f29b1311cc7aa6d3f5 | Projections of the differential light hadron production cross-section as a function of p integrated over the range 30 ≤θ < 210 mrad (left panel), and production cross-section as a function of θ in the range 0.75 ≤ p < 6.5 (right panel). The points show the HARP measurements, the dotted curve the best-fit Sanford-Wang parametrization. | hep | ex0510039-harpswfit_Al5_129_1dimproj.jpg |
0.553001 | 369b943501a749c5a3ce3f1a662d7774 | The Wess-Zumino-Witten Lagrangian expanded in terms of the triangle and box anomaly. | hep | ex0510040-LWZW.jpg |
0.454335 | 9e7d214a8bc447d5834b1292d565a6c2 | Cross section to the WASA detector. The different components are discussed in the text. | hep | ex0510040-WASA.jpg |
0.438646 | 4bfdf75b85b44f78a2367e5a796d472d | The slope parameter α from various measurements and calculations. The references are given in <cit.> except for the preliminary results. | hep | ex0510040-alpha.jpg |
0.571476 | 9aa5fe224d8348d0a959de00482e204d | The results of the η-mass measurements, in order of publication date, taken from the Rutherford Laboratory (RL) <cit.>, SATURNE <cit.>, MAMI <cit.>, NA48 <cit.>, and GEM <cit.>. When two error bars are shown, the smaller is statistical and the larger total. | hep | ex0510040-gem3.jpg |
0.416494 | 0761247296434279a71000479b74614a | Excitation functions of the total cross sections for pp→η pp (circles) and pp→η 'pp reactions (squares). The different curves are discussed in the text. | hep | ex0510040-pp2pp_eta.jpg |
0.487715 | ee21fecc2874488b9f7c0543722706a5 | The ratio of the two OZI rule related reactions as function of the excess energy. | hep | ex0510040-pp_OZI.jpg |
0.511973 | adf707fee48d4ff4ab3b639da2de0309 | The ratio of associated strangeness production as function of the excess energy. | hep | ex0510040-sigma2lambda_Cosy11.jpg |
0.501758 | 887df3b2ff2949feb1a32a70f1a691b1 | Comparison of the measured pn excitation energy spectrum on a linear scale with the prediction the singlet cross section folded with the present resolution. The error bars contain a tiny contribution from the uncertainty in the acceptance correction. | hep | ex0510040-singlet.jpg |
0.46515 | c9327f6288df4a76a6657f3a95b1dd16 | The distribution of the pK_S^0 invariant mass for combinations satisfying the criteria described in the text. The same data are plotted for the full kinematically-allowed pK_S^0 mass range and, in the inset, with statistical uncertainties and a suppressed zero on the vertical scale, for the mass range in which the has been reported. | hep | ex0510041-0502004-fig01.jpg |
0.449536 | f82d1e18909c4317b2fec18d6dbc987d | Compilation of meson and baryon production rates in e^+e^- annihilation <cit.> from experiments at the Z^0 (gray) and √(s)≈ 10(black) as a function of baryon mass. The vertical scale accounts for the number of spin and particle+antiparticle states, and the lines are chosen to guide the eye. The arrows indicate our upper limits on spin-1/2 Θ^+ and Ξ_5^– pentaquark states, assuming the branching fractions shown, and are seen to lie below the solid line. | hep | ex0510044-Bary-prodTry.jpg |
0.432295 | 75c0218ca4f849ab8b2516186c1f46d5 | Slope parameter of the multiple interaction correction for R_jet=0.7 versus instantaneous luminosity in W→ e ν, minimum bias, as well as in a jet sample with E_T threshold of 100 GeV. | hep | ex0510047-Stability_with_Lum.jpg |
0.451332 | 1983d2e483a0432f82777c86d120684d | Absolute corrections for different cone sizes as a function of calorimeter jet p_T. The solid line shows the corrections for cone size 0.4, the dashed for 0.7 and the dotted for 1.0. | hep | ex0510047-abs.jpg |
0.443491 | 0b3cad53e306405c8e5bb65b86d2dfa7 | Systematic uncertainty on the jet energy scale due to the calorimeter calibration and simulation. The solid line shows the total uncertainty and the other lines show individual contributions. | hep | ex0510047-abssys.jpg |
0.440301 | 7cd75712d57049749226f34f3ea86bfa | Top left: Energy observed in CHA for particles that do not interact in the CEM. Total (top right), CEM (bottom right) and CHA (bottom left) energy for charged pions with p=57 GeV/c. The test beam data (points) are compared to the CDF simulation (solid line). | hep | ex0510047-calor_pi57.jpg |
0.473102 | ce3a8af2d62646e5bbf82b63b7ba730c | Elevation view of one half of the CDF detector displaying the components of the CDF calorimeter: CEM, CHA, WHA, PEM and PHA. | hep | ex0510047-calor_pic1.jpg |
0.436117 | 92dc6502122444009bc641b69df24b71 | Top: Jet response R_ave for data (closed circles), PYTHIA (open circles) and HERWIG (open triangles) for R_jet=0.4 jets as function of p_T^jet. Bottom: Difference between data and PYTHIA (open circles) and data and HERWIG (open triangles). | hep | ex0510047-closs.jpg |
0.379482 | c33639c4c0e34edd98b6365c19d03bed | β_dijet for particle jets as a function of jet η_jet for PYTHIA (open circles) and HERWIG (open triangles) for p̂_T>18 GeV/c and for R_jet=0.4. | hep | ex0510047-dijet_hadron04.jpg |
0.44229 | 4575fe6123c84114a673517800b25726 | ⟨ E/p ⟩ vs. ϕ_rel for particles with momenta between 3 and 5 GeV/c (left) and for particles with momenta between 12 and 16 GeV/c (right). Top: data (full points) and MC (open squares). Bottom: difference between data and MC. | hep | ex0510047-eophad.jpg |
0.453144 | df41d0c62de24b4b94d6ccfd4fc14ede | ⟨ E/p ⟩ versus p for electrons and positrons from J/ψ→ e^+ e^- and W→ e^±ν_e data (closed triangles and circles) and MC samples (open triangles and circles) samples. | hep | ex0510047-eopvsp_em.jpg |
0.472395 | 3ebb952149064782943f35891346c8b3 | Mean energy observed in the CHA/WHA for CMUP and CMX muons with p_T>20 GeV/c from W→μν_μ candidate events versus run number. The CMUP muons are confined to |η|<0.6 and thus only sensitive to the central part of the CHA. The CMX muons cover the region 0.6<|η|<1.0 and probe the outer part of the CHA plus the innermost part of the WHA. The dashed lines indicate a 1.5% uncertainty. | hep | ex0510047-hadevsrun.jpg |
0.447399 | d46f1030aabc41908057dbf348d87bbe | Difference between ⟨ E/p ⟩ of data and MC versus particle momentum p. Shown is the difference for minimum bias Data and MC (squares), single track data and MC (circles) and test beam data and MC (triangles). The dashed lines indicate the quoted systematic uncertainties. The error bars on the minimum bias and single track data are statistical. For the test beam data we do not display any uncertainty. | hep | ex0510047-nim_central_ratio.jpg |
0.467465 | 7278c37834e64d2f9cc29c147418b9bb | Fractional energy observed in the central calorimeter as a function of incident particle momenta. The top row shows ⟨ E_CEM/p ⟩, ⟨ E_CHA/p ⟩ and ⟨ (E_CEM+E_CHA)/p ⟩ for data signal (triangles) and background (histogram) and for single track MC simulation (open circles). The bottom row shows the same distributions for data after background subtraction (full circles) and MC simulation (open circles). | hep | ex0510047-nim_track.jpg |
0.545734 | 82357cd2a9d144b0937dd52e1f2ec680 | Δ p_T= - for R_jet=0.4 jets matched using Δ R< 0.1 for different bins. | hep | ex0510047-ny_2.jpg |
0.538029 | a214277855f64d25b7de567da9f00adf | OOC correction, C_OOC versus p_T^parton/p_T^particle, versus p_T^particle for cone sizes 0.4 (solid line), 0.7 (dashed line) and 1.0 (dotted line). | hep | ex0510047-ooc_corr.jpg |
0.442704 | 0d7e61180a2449a3bcfe622638b92df4 | Normalized distributions of the momentum in different annuli outside the jet cone for data, PYTHIA and HERWIG γ+jets events. | hep | ex0510047-ooc_r1r2.jpg |
0.480935 | fad5ca91737e48ddb72409db7e16a6b2 | Systematic uncertainty of OOC corrections for different cone sizes. The systematic uncertainty is taken as the largest difference between data and either PYTHIA or HERWIG and multiplied by the particle-jet/calorimeter-jet factors. | hep | ex0510047-oocsys.jpg |
0.469695 | 6222222554d34beabf239ab42b2e0270 | p_T balance, p_T^jet/p_T^γ-1, in data (full circles), PYTHIA (open circles) and HERWIG (open triangles) as function of η_jet for R_jet=0.4 | hep | ex0510047-ptbal_l1.jpg |
0.529774 | 9a9a81366cdf4624bf0a30fca439d3d5 | γ-jet balance in data, PYTHIA and HERWIG for R_jet=0.4. Overlaid is the corresponding γ-jet balance on particle level jets (triangles) calculated using particles at generator level without detector simulation. The distributions are normalized to 1. | hep | ex0510047-ptbal_l5.jpg |
0.534004 | 1a5105f4875d46a39eb0a694789a01a3 | γ-jet balance in data, PYTHIA and HERWIG using R_jet=0.4, 0.7 and 1.0 after η-dependent, absolute and OOC+UE corrections. | hep | ex0510047-ptbal_l7.jpg |
0.454367 | fdb0becbb1d640cfab7318a610326daa | Difference of the γ-jet balance between data and HERWIG as a function of p_T^γ in six regions of η_jet. All three cone sizes are shown: 0.4 (blue squares), 0.7 (red open circles) and 1.0 (black triangles). The curves indicate the total systematic uncertainty in each η region. | hep | ex0510047-ptbal_sys_hg.jpg |
0.44613 | c9f8917770e14a0eae7b6fdd239970c3 | Difference of the γ-jet balance between data and PYTHIA as a function of p_T^γ in six regions of η_jet. All three cone sizes are shown: 0.4 (blue squares), 0.7 (red open circles) and 1.0 (black triangles). The curves indicate the total systematic uncertainty in each η region. | hep | ex0510047-ptbal_sys_py.jpg |
0.408732 | 7c211fe5f9344117b998b670bae4e073 | Dijet balance, β_dijet=p_T^probe/p_T^trigger, as a function of η_jet in data, HERWIG and PYTHIA MC samples for R_jet=0.4 jets. Shown are the corrections for jet-20, jet-50, jet-70 and jet-100 jet samples, corresponding to 25<p_T^ave<55 GeV/c, 55<p_T^ave<75 GeV/c, 75<p_T^ave<105 GeV/c and p_T^ave>105 GeV/c, respectively. The lines show the interpolation between the individual measurements used for correcting jets. | hep | ex0510047-rel04.jpg |
0.402695 | cc7b40c8803b49cfb866be75f63acb00 | Dijet balance, β_dijet=p_T^probe/p_T^trigger, as a function of η_jet in data, HERWIG and PYTHIA MC samples for R_jet=0.7 jets. Shown are the corrections for jet-20, jet-50, jet-70 and jet-100 jet samples, corresponding to 25<p_T^ave<55 GeV/c, 55<p_T^ave<75 GeV/c, 75<p_T^ave<105 GeV/c and p_T^ave>105 GeV/c, respectively. The lines show the interpolation between the individual measurements used for correcting jets. | hep | ex0510047-rel07.jpg |
0.407579 | 928eac28930644a38d50827f73ad12c3 | Dijet balance, β_dijet=p_T^probe/p_T^trigger, as a function of η_jet in data, HERWIG and PYTHIA MC samples for R_jet=1.0 jets. Shown are the corrections for the jet-20, jet-50, jet-70 and jet-100 jet samples, corresponding to 25<p_T^ave<55 GeV/c, 55<p_T^ave<75 GeV/c, 75<p_T^ave<105 GeV/c and p_T^ave>105 GeV/c, respectively. The lines show the interpolation between the individual measurements used for correcting jets. | hep | ex0510047-rel10.jpg |
0.443109 | 003a9605da0a4ec0a6743707954cc08b | Dijet balance, β_dijet=p_T^probe/p_T^trigger, as a function of η_jet in data and PYTHIA MC samples for cone size R_jet=0.4 after applying the η-dependent corrections. Shown are the jet-20 (top left), jet-50 (top right), jet-70 (bottom left) and jet-100 (bottom right) jet samples, corresponding to 25<p_T^ave<55 GeV/c, 55<p_T^ave<75 GeV/c, 75<p_T^ave<105 GeV/c and p_T^ave>105 GeV/c, respectively. | hep | ex0510047-relcor04.jpg |
0.420845 | 22d104990cc74d5f99cd5693418be240 | Dijet balance, β_dijet=p_T^probe/p_T^trigger, as a function of η_jet in data and PYTHIA MC samples for cone size R_jet=0.7 after applying the η-dependent corrections. Shown are the jet-20 (top left), jet-50 (top right), jet-70 (bottom left) and jet-100 (bottom right) jet samples, corresponding to 25<p_T^ave<55 GeV/c, 55<p_T^ave<75 GeV/c, 75<p_T^ave<105 GeV/c and p_T^ave>105 GeV/c, respectively. | hep | ex0510047-relcor07.jpg |
0.423941 | 8b6a4e53eef248fd86973e3e20106d53 | Dijet balance, β_dijet=p_T^probe/p_T^trigger, as a function of η_jet in data and PYTHIA MC samples for cone size R_jet=1.0 after applying the η-dependent corrections. Shown are the jet-20 (top left), jet-50 (top right), jet-70 (bottom left) and jet-100 (bottom right) jet samples, corresponding to 25<p_T^ave<55 GeV/c, 55<p_T^ave<75 GeV/c, 75<p_T^ave<105 GeV/c and p_T^ave>105 GeV/c, respectively. | hep | ex0510047-relcor10.jpg |
0.462577 | d6826e06c1ac4f82bd923cb0a3247ee1 | Comparison of the particle momentum spectra in dijet events between data with PYTHIA and HERWIG. The CDF data have been corrected for track reconstruction efficiency. | hep | ex0510047-simon_p.jpg |
0.466817 | 0a795c65c8364d399dfbf9eb22b9578f | Systematic uncertainties as a function of the corrected jet p_T in 0.2<|η|<0.6. | hep | ex0510047-tot_sys.jpg |
0.402944 | 6d6a8faeef6b43c085dc15c5b544c999 | The average transverse momentum of charged particles in the transverse region as described in the text versus leading jet p_T <cit.> calculated using tracks in R_jet=0.7. The data are shown as points and are compared to the predictions from PYTHIA (dashed-dotted line), HERWIG (solid line) and ISAJET (dashed line). | hep | ex0510047-ue.jpg |
0.529225 | 0db5bfa1854d4aa4b67918760ed98001 | Z-jet balance in data (closed black circles), PYTHIA (solid red line) and HERWIG (dashed blue line) for R_jet=0.4 (top left), R_jet=0.7 (top right) and R_jet=1.0 (bottom left) after all corrections. | hep | ex0510047-zjets.jpg |
0.421991 | f74230212dd94ae88d8e7d6c2df9187e | Mean invariant mass of Z→ e^+e^- candidates, ⟨ M(ee) ⟩, versus run number for events with 86<M(ee)<98 GeV/c^2. Shown are the values for events with both electrons in the central calorimeter (full circles) and for events with one electron in the central and one in the plug calorimeter (open circles). The dashed lines indicate a ± 0.3% uncertainty around 91.1 GeV/c^2. | hep | ex0510047-zmassvrun.jpg |
0.499254 | 0030ae31a88e45b1a4960ff055ca2c4e | The systematic uncertainties on jet energy are shown for jets in the central calorimeter (0.2<|η|<0.6). For non-central jets, the total uncertainty has a different contribution from the eta-dependent uncertainty. In this plot the corrected jet transverse momentum ^corr is the process-independent estimate of the parton . At low ^corr, the main contribution to the systematic is from the uncertainty on the fraction of jet energy lost outside the cone, while at high ^corr it is from the linearity corrections to obtain an absolute jet energy scale. | hep | ex0510048-05081917_TotSys.jpg |
0.501158 | 50024ef3a7bb454086bc5bd3afdf2938 | For γ-jet events in both data and simulation, we find the fractional difference in between the jet and the photon after all jet corrections are applied. Plotted here, for different ranges of jet η, is the difference between this quantity in data and simulated events as a function of photon . The solid lines show the ±1 range given by the jet energy systematics. The other lines follow the same definitions as in f:totalJetSyst. | hep | ex0510048-05101011_gammajet.jpg |
0.408407 | b85dbf583fd74d27a4b0f419737b53cf | The distribution of the reconstructed b jets | hep | ex0510048-Bjet_ttopdh_comp-all_318.jpg |
0.442739 | 9c1a5d5a168244219989d7bc796ed953 | The rapidity distribution of the reconstructed top quarks | hep | ex0510048-Eta_top_ttopdh_comp-all_318.jpg |
0.396308 | b425e881de4e4df1b774054cf1a76779 | The number of jets distribution Jets are required to have >8 and |η|<2.0. | hep | ex0510048-Njets_ttopdh_comp-all_318.jpg |
0.400857 | 3ea7da49af514e2db6ad4246a4916621 | The distribution of the reconstructed top quarks | hep | ex0510048-Pt_top_ttopdh_comp-all_318.jpg |
0.438959 | d1d09eddcaf24022a53400ba8dfefe9a | The distribution of the reconstructed system | hep | ex0510048-Pt_ttbar_ttopdh_comp-all_318.jpg |
0.412343 | f0e29e2ed65543d6a9aab9f0302c23c8 | The distribution of the reconstructed W bosons | hep | ex0510048-Pt_w_ttopdh_comp-all_318.jpg |
0.501493 | 293c5728493d43fc9ac5560f85a4e7a0 | The efficiency of the secondary vertex b-tagging algorithm is shown as a function of jet for b jets in the central region of the detector (|η|<1), where the tracking efficiency is high. The shaded band gives the ±1 range for b-tagging efficiency. The curve is measured using a combination of data and Monte Carlo simulated samples. | hep | ex0510048-btageff_prd.jpg |
0.488594 | 41171f4e95fb4efdbec3fe5f57efceef | An elevation view of the CDF detector. From the collision region outwards, CDF consists of a silicon strip detector, a tracking drift chamber, an electromagnetic calorimeter, a hadronic calorimeter, and muon chambers. | hep | ex0510048-cdfelev2.jpg |
0.455296 | 3b33157e0bc141c3b733c32a552dfb7c | The reconstructed top quark mass distribution for the 18 events with one secondary vertex tag and one JPB tag, overlaid with the expected distribution from the fit to this subsample. The inset shows the shape of - Δ log L for the fit to these events as a function of the top quark mass. | hep | ex0510048-cfinal_5.jpg |
0.408268 | 16eaf32df68148efb9ea9e785a0fcd18 | The distribution is shown for data events and for signal and background simulated events in the expected ratio. Distributions are shown for (upper left), (upper right), (lower left), and (lower right) events. | hep | ex0510048-chi2_comp_prd.jpg |
0.417332 | 5764e2abe54341ca9c867586a6a3d8f4 | The reconstructed dijet mass distribution for each subsample is shown overlaid with the expected distribution using the top quark mass, jet energy scale, signal normalization, and background normalization from the combined fit. | hep | ex0510048-datafit_mjj_prd.jpg |
0.419611 | 5f8e9439296d40e8a942daf43fea23a7 | The reconstructed top quark mass distribution for each subsample is shown overlaid with the expected distribution using the top quark mass, jet energy scale, signal normalization, and background normalization from the combined fit. | hep | ex0510048-datafit_mt_prd.jpg |
0.453658 | 0cc2e4681b9b41949dacecccccf1b89f | The light histograms show the reconstructed top quark mass distribution for the 178 herwig sample at the nominal jet energy scale. Overlaid are darker histograms of the reconstructed mass distributions using the subset of events for which the leading four jets are matched (within Δ R=0.4) to the four quarks from the decay and the correct jet-quark assignment has the lowest . Distributions are shown for (upper left), (upper right), (lower left), and (lower right) events. | hep | ex0510048-defaulttopsigtemp_prd.jpg |
0.480237 | ba6fc4a5697e47f89f219d2894738036 | The reconstructed dijet mass distributions for the 178herwig sample at the nominal jet energy scale. Overlaid are darker histograms of the reconstructed mass distributions using the subset of events for which the leading four jets include two jets matched (within Δ R=0.4) to the two quarks from the hadronic W decay, and plotting just the invariant mass of those two jets. Distributions are shown for (upper left), (upper right), (lower left), and (lower right) events. | hep | ex0510048-defaultwsigtemp_prd.jpg |
0.423409 | 319ba47b8f3247deb2b53e6660a73a1b | Results of the dijet balancing procedure are shown for data and simulated dijet events with >20. Probe jets from throughout the detector are compared with a reference jet in the central region; the ratio of the of the jets is plotted as a function of the probe jet η. The simulation models well the detector response as a function of η. | hep | ex0510048-dijetbal.jpg |
0.467217 | 1681444c759b4d4e85658dce111ea43d | The contours of the likelihood in the -plane for the combined fit to all four subsamples. At each point in the plane, the likelihood is maximized with respect to the other free parameters. The crosshair shows the best fit point, and contours are given at at regular intervals in Δln L, the change in log-likelihood from its maximum. | hep | ex0510048-likelihoodcontour2d_1_prd_v2.jpg |
0.500974 | 7f514a9c1e3f4eb9afdff5ed70f860a1 | The distributions of positive and negative uncertainties from the likelihood fit are shown, for pseudo-experiments generated with a top quark mass of 172.5, the nominal jet energy scale, and the number of events in each subsample as observed in the data. Arrows indicate the positive and negative uncertainties from the likelihood fit to the data; 9.2% of the pseudo-experiments have smaller uncertainties. | hep | ex0510048-mtop_expect_uncert_prd.jpg |
0.441759 | bd0d1f82038a4350977eb59a245e83b2 | The templates for W and Wc background processes are compared to the high-statistics W template for all tagged events. The agreement is good in both cases, so the W template is used to represent all W + h.f. processes. | hep | ex0510048-mtop_wbb-cc-c_prd.jpg |
0.389804 | 8067f54c53f84b1aa9bf9918eed35e75 | Top quark mass measurements using the -only fit are compared for different assumptions (top-specific corrections (default) vs generic jet out-of-cone corrections, constrained backgrounds vs unconstrained) and different ways of subdividing the sample (two different run periods, electrons vs muons, positive-charge leptons vs negative-charge leptons). All results with only statistical errors are consistent. | hep | ex0510048-prd_xcheck1.jpg |
0.39593 | 290ebbb2dcc242ce869e7d92168439d6 | Top quark mass measurements using the -only fit are compared for various samples. From top to bottom: all four subsamples; , , and subsamples; and subsamples only; and subsamples only, additional jets <15; and subsamples only, additional jets <8. All results with only statistical errors are found to be consistent. | hep | ex0510048-prd_xcheck2.jpg |
0.464178 | 4a15b017c3de4b27a6cb37c281096477 | The average of the dilepton system, which corresponds to the level of ISR activity, shows a logarithmic dependence on the dilepton invariant mass M_ll^2. The data are compared with the predictions of pythia 6.2 and of the +1σ_ISR and -1σ_ISR samples. | hep | ex0510048-pt_evol_gen_corr_v4_prd.jpg |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.