dedup-isc-ft-v107-score
float64
0.32
1
uid
stringlengths
32
32
text
stringlengths
0
32.5k
paper_id
stringlengths
1
14
original_image_filename
stringlengths
5
222
0.412878
42472288f46d40acb4893d3ef8e8f648
dn_s/ dln k vs. κ.
hep
ph0510105-dn.jpg
0.46007
6a6eff55295e461f9e8e8c2b52476b82
The value of the symmetry breaking scale M (solid) and the magnitude of the inflaton |S| (dashed) vs. κ. We take m_3/2=10^3 GeV and a>0.
hep
ph0510105-ms.jpg
0.428404
64bb0dd1ff69465b8b909aa64140ff24
The spectral index n_s vs. κ.
hep
ph0510105-n.jpg
0.43049
9818555de7ec4a8fa5dbb2db28ba1323
The tensor to scalar ratio r vs. κ.
hep
ph0510105-r.jpg
0.513083
1ca3bcb0341d4f76bf213d8ba08422da
ℛ vs. κ. M=1.24×10^16 GeV (solid), M=1×10^16 GeV (dashed), and M=8.7×10^15 GeV (dot-dashed). The dotted horizontal line corresponds to ℛ=(4.7± 0.3)×10^-5. We take m_3/2=10^3 GeV and a>0.
hep
ph0510105-rk2.jpg
0.459632
8ef86372f4884363ba6fa4d34f1165cd
The lower bound on the reheat temperature T_r (solid) and the inflaton mass m_χ (dashed) vs. κ.
hep
ph0510105-tm.jpg
0.387227
fec7b58a5c724f798a244330fb15624e
FESR prediction of t_c versus t_c in GeV^2. The green curve corresponds the central value of the data; the blue ones to the larger and smaller values of the data; the red line is the solution t_c=t_c, where both beyond this value, the predictions from the LHS and RHS should exactly coïncide. The curves correspond to the value t_>=1.75 GeV^2; m̂_s=(56-145) MeV and a_sλ^2=-(0.04-0.1) GeV^2.
hep
ph0510108-duality3.jpg
0.409786
4198a017caa841ffbd66c46335fe6356
Upperbound of R_τ,ϕ versus M_τ in GeV for a_sλ^2=-0.07 GeV^2, using the central value of the data.
hep
ph0510108-phibound.jpg
0.463032
0598c798f6eb4b05886ed84ccd52b9e9
m_π^- plot versus isospin chemical potential for different temperatures. All values are scaled with m_π. The vertical line corresponds to = m.
hep
ph0510124-m-s.jpg
0.479393
4c6228ab7cb045bdb91f3a34bf831952
m_π^-(T,). All the parameters are scaled with m_π
hep
ph0510124-m-s3d.jpg
0.501105
e0081e3595cf40c2a06c47f9a8eb9ca1
m_π^0 and m_π^+ as a function of high values of the isospin chemical potential at different values of temperature.
hep
ph0510124-m0mpc.jpg
0.431671
5447e52156ab47f3affe8f8f056af8c5
m_π^0 and m_π^+ as a function of high values of the isospin chemical potential at different values of temperature. All parameters are scaled with m_π
hep
ph0510124-m0mps.jpg
0.395961
7c18d8c7038a4577a3da2044326fb26f
m_π^- as a function of for fixed values of T in units of m_π.
hep
ph0510124-mm.jpg
0.451263
e21b3ac37441450e8782e6545c814b14
Pion masses as a function of the isospin chemical potential at tree-level
hep
ph0510124-mtree.jpg
0.470056
ebd8ec033a0547cf899d21617bdc6354
Isospin-number density as a function of the isospin chemical potential at different values of the temperature in the high chemical potential limit.
hep
ph0510124-nic.jpg
0.437491
75e12b79312e47518d0cc329ef1ed89a
Isospin-number density condensate as a function of the isospin chemical potential for different values of the temperature.
hep
ph0510124-niphase1.jpg
0.430364
61e933de0df14a009bae20cad861bf74
Isospin number density as a function of the isospin chemical potential for different values of the temperature.
hep
ph0510124-nis.jpg
0.476415
1e3d7aab7e1a4fe288c96834a1418e06
Diagramatic contribution to the PCAC relation at one-loop corrections.
hep
ph0510124-pcac.jpg
0.434996
1c162d7cc25343bda565368f3b837969
Phase diagram of the condensation point of temperature versus isospin chemical potential. The dashed line corresponds to the approximation made by Splittorff, Toublan and Veerbarschot <cit.>.
hep
ph0510124-phase.jpg
0.499189
e77d12af88c848c9996e557384d0faa1
Pion condensate as a function of the isospin chemical potential for different temperatures in the limit of high chemical potential.
hep
ph0510124-pic.jpg
0.461897
874f495ad2254091b116420ff8e95103
Pion condensate as a function of the isospin chemical potential for different values of the temperature. The vertical line denotes the transition point between the two phases.
hep
ph0510124-pis.jpg
0.999953
bf605f014118498c8712a95bab4944df
Propagators in the second phase for
hep
ph0510124-propc.jpg
0.504308
2fafc17436c0477ea7c6e0ac8bdeff12
Propagators in the first phase (and in second phase for ||≳ m). The double line denotes the neutral propagator. The single line denotes the charged propagator with an arrow pointing from
hep
ph0510124-props.jpg
0.519052
5355bf3480d4496382c5a85bcd6bfe4d
Chiral condensate as a function of the isospin chemical potential for different values of the temperature for high values of the chemical potential.
hep
ph0510124-qqmuggm.jpg
0.520941
bcd7a8e7c5a94b52a0d5e0317d5c79c0
Chiral condensate as a function of the isospin chemical potential for different values of the temperature. The vertical line denotes the transition point between the two phases.
hep
ph0510124-qqmusimm.jpg
0.425751
493a06fce970496a972cff949606ce0f
Quark condensate as a function of the temperature and the isospin chemical potential
hep
ph0510124-qqphase1.jpg
0.999953
bb5ae01088a54932aa90648eaafbad05
Vertices in the second phase for ||≫ m). The double line denotes the π^0 leg. The single line represents the π̃^1 and the dashed line represent the π̃^2 leg.
hep
ph0510124-vertc.jpg
0.516603
3e2bb6949ec74a8fb1e278b377181c71
Vertices in the first phase (and in second phase for ||≳ m). The double line denotes the neutral pion leg. The single line represents the charged pion leg with an arrow pointing outside from the vertex for the π^+ and into the vertex for the π^- (or π̃^+ and π̃^- in second phase for ||≳ m)
hep
ph0510124-verts.jpg
0.503906
657a0170ba3249c1b80758aec623347a
Contribution of lowest-order hadronic vacuum polarization to the muon magnetic moment.
hep
ph0510134-gmudia.jpg
0.433889
7884c3f854b644109872c4128a88fe11
Plot of the large- and small-z expansions of the function W(z) as given by the OPE and Chiral Theory, respectively (dashed curves). The solid curve corresponds to the interpolating function W(z)_(V;S) obtained in Eq. (<ref>).
hep
ph0510136-Wz.jpg
0.511594
fa76a47d906c4b36b1105867994b6846
Pictorical representation of the up-up exchange contribution.
hep
ph0510136-butterfly.jpg
0.513489
8ab1477dae3d4537b45199e7faf79f77
Comparison of the data from ALEPH <cit.> and OPAL <cit.> (overlaid on a single curve) with the model, 1π Im Π(q^2). As with the experimental data, the kinematical factors for tau decays are included and the pion contribution has been subtracted.
hep
ph0510136-data2.jpg
0.434512
e3d0a26f04c54b84b8902bac87b6e63a
Contour integral leading to (<ref>). The crosses on the real axis stand for the resonance poles in large-N_C or the physical cut when resonance widths are taken into account.
hep
ph0510136-dual.jpg
0.441446
e1b82ba85a9a4852bf5bde834c3c0e4f
Contour over the complex q^2 plane used to split the duality violating term in the two pieces of (<ref>) and (<ref>).
hep
ph0510136-dual1.jpg
0.448317
b3bcf729d11443719456e9ec59fb5276
Plot of the right and left-hand side of Eq. (<ref>) (in arbitrary units), corresponding to the dashed and solid curves, respectively.
hep
ph0510136-duality.jpg
0.492673
300b7a2f1b6149f0ac7d4e4f79fca03d
Factorization of the up-up contribution leading to Γ_μνα.
hep
ph0510136-greenfunction.jpg
0.466406
4e5216348847439a99fe84879df7c687
Profile of the function Q^2 W(Q^2)_HA together with the chiral and OPE behaviour at low and high Q^2 (in D=4), respectively. The pion contribution has been subtracted away (the a parameter in Eq. (<ref>)), according to the discussion in the main text.
hep
ph0510136-matching.jpg
0.431227
12aa2f4c39384e1a834acd1773093def
The unitarity triangle.
hep
ph0510136-triangle.jpg
0.488471
35a942b1b3a9431bace20f4e9de56791
The μ_S scale dependence of the gluino contribution to d_n^e at LO (upper curve) and NLO (lower curve).
hep
ph0510137-p1agluscalaNLO.jpg
0.543356
f83959445e8e4eca98550554db9705a6
The Δ R_jj distribution for jj production as predicted by the hard matrix element and the parton showers.
hep
ph0510144-gogo_dr4_lhc.jpg
0.452191
3c5424d847ed46d4be8f17ab3459ce38
Superconducting gap Δ as a function of the quark chemical potential. The solid line is the solution of Eq. (<ref>) and the dashed line is the result using a cutoff in I_fin.
hep
ph0510145-gap.jpg
0.458518
14676a5d2fc64e4faadaf28515fd8c75
Dependence of lightest boson mass on β
hep
ph0510154-grafbeta.jpg
0.436874
6638b9b38f2e425b8e58e79ed21ed53f
The difference of the Born terms as given by the B(Q^2)
hep
ph0510155-born_rev.jpg
0.472447
b7e2371e5edb4275a05fb743b4af5f98
The estimate of the left-hand side of Eq.(17). The dotted curve (a) is the one given by the Born contribution B(Q^2) and Eq.(19) by neglecting K(2,Q^2). The curve (b) is the one including the contribution from K(2,Q^2).
hep
ph0510155-g1_int_rev.jpg
0.458659
ff87c25c38b94b44a1fa90e8f7fae0d7
The mass parameter m_ω^2 defined in eq. (<ref>) and averaged within the Borel window as a function of the baryon density for κ_N = 4 and c_4 = 0 (solid curve). Note that the parameter m_ω^2 coincides only in zero-width approximation with the ω pole mass squared; in general it is a normalized moment of ImΠ^ω to be calculated from data or models. The sum rule eq. (<ref>) is evaluated as described in the text with appropriately adjusted κ_0. Inclusion of c_4^(0) = O (± 10^-3) GeV^8 requires a readjustment of κ_0 in the range 1 ⋯ 5 to m_ω^(0) 2. A simultaneous change of κ_N in the order of 20 % is needed to recover the same density dependence as given by the solid curve at small values of n. The effect of a c_4^(1) term is exhibited, too (c_4^(1) = ± 10^-5 n_0^-1 GeV^8: dashed curves, c_4^(1) = ± 5 × 10^-5 n_0^-1 GeV^8: dotted curves; the upper (lower) curves are for negative (positive) signs).
hep
ph0510156-figure1OmegaDensityNEWSTYLE.jpg
0.488851
8c87faeeef6b47a5807af5bb99c69e0a
hep
ph0510158-coordinate.jpg
0.580695
3fc15da1857b40ad8a5e87f5758ee703
The γ→π transition distribution amplitude (TDA).
hep
ph0510161-wafig1.jpg
0.500445
e2c0974640364383954a43c04b41923c
Phase diagram of N_f = 2 QCD as a function of μ_I and θ. Here, ϵ = m_u - m_d/m_u + m_d = 0.01. A rapid crossover occurs in the normal phase at θ = π, which becomes a first order phase transition, when m_u = m_d.
hep
ph0510162-NB.jpg
0.460532
dbc77dd53c7341f5b7e866d36b5d67b0
Phase diagram of N_f = 2 QCD for m_u = m_d. Solid line indicates a first order phase transition, while dashed lines indicate second order phase transitions. The region near the triple point is subject to further investigation.
hep
ph0510162-NBN.jpg
0.509968
7e8f3cd641a14d1b8204fb881d53656f
Same as Fig.<ref> but for the CP violation (see the text).
hep
ph0510166-sensitivity_cp_detector.jpg
0.487127
2816674c58db4567ac71cf11f1a58f25
2(thin lines) and 3(thick lines) standard deviation sensitivities to the mass hierarchy for the various fiducial volume ratio of [Kamioka: Korea] = [1:0] (dashed lines, blue), [1:1] (solid lines, black), [3:7] (dash-dot lines, yellow), [1:9] (dash-dot-dot lines, green), and [0:1] (dotted lines, red), keeping the total volume equals to 0.54 Mton. 4 years running with neutrino beam and another 4 years with anti-neutrino beam are assumed. The other mixing parameters are fixed to the current best fit values as described in <cit.>.
hep
ph0510166-sensitivity_mass_detector.jpg
0.507277
ba3bef8807bb456fb90505a926d62b14
Decay and inverse-decay amplitudes entering in the Boltzmann equations. The solid lines show the decay amplitude γ_D in the Maxwell–Bolzmann limit as given by Eq. (<ref>), and the corresponding inverse–decay amplitude γ_ID. The dotted and dashed curves show the result of a full numerical evaluation of the same amplitudes for fermionic and bosonic final states, respectively.
hep
ph0510170-fig1.jpg
0.497054
b58e3edc08b24e919da8e4e224a7969a
Diagrams contributing to the gauge–annihilation amplitude of triplet particles. Δ̃, Δ̃_̃c̃ represent the fermionic partners of Δ and Δ_c, respectively, while A indicates a gauge boson, λ a gaugino, h a Higgs particle, h̃ a higgsino, f a fermion and f̃ a sfermion.
hep
ph0510170-fig2.jpg
0.468992
e79ab50d7b214988bfa1894595a153f6
Fractional departure of the triplet comoving density Y_X from its equilibrium value Y^eq_X, as a function of z≡ m/T. The higher curve shows the result of a calculation where the gauge annihilation effect is neglected, while the lower ones show the same quantity including annihilation for Im(A)=1 TeV and log_10(M/ GeV)= 8,7,6,5,4,3 from left to right. All curves are evaluated in the Maxwell–Boltzmann approximation.
hep
ph0510170-fig3.jpg
0.433567
0eaa40245e634714bb70e97ace4234eb
The dashed curve shows the approximation to δ_BF(z) in Eq. (<ref>), while the solid line is the result of a numerical evaluation of the same quantity, which includes the effect of thermal masses and of Fermi–Dirac and Bose–Einstein distributions. The dotted curve shows the result of a numerical calculation of the thermal average R_H_2 C_L̃ which multiplies the soft supersymmetry breaking term in Eq. (<ref>).
hep
ph0510170-fig4.jpg
0.581635
fd8d12b97aaa47b4821a9b3af8aa107c
Final lepton asymmetry produced by triplet decay as a function of M. Different curves refer to (A)=1,2,3,4,5 TeV from bottom to top.
hep
ph0510170-fig5.jpg
0.480018
bc2bd7a098234b7e9a2346672332ec3e
Eikonal propagation of a quark with transverse position x through a target evolved at rapidity Y. The eikonal phase W_F(x), see formula (<ref>), resums all number of gluon exchanges.
hep
ph0510176-Fig1.jpg
0.390636
546595a28ccd430ea3911b5f60fd6b68
The charged particle mean multiplicity N_ ch per participant pair (N_ part/2) as a function of the c.m. energy. The solid and combined symbols show the multiplicity values from: most central heavy-ion (AA) collisions c.m. energy per nucleon, , measured by PHOBOS ph-rev (▪), NA49 na49-mult (), and E895 agsmult () (see also ph-rev); collisions, by UA5 (▴ for non-single diffractive, ▾ for inelastic events) at = 546 GeV ua5-546 and = 200 and 900 GeV ua5-zp; pp collisions (at lower ) from CERN-ISR (∙) isr-thome and bubble chamber experiments bubblechamber,fnalmult () (the latter compiled and analysed in eddi). The inelastic UA5 data at = 200 GeV is due to the extrapolation in ph-rev. The open symbols show the measurements: the high-energy LEP mean multiplicities (◯) averaged here from the data at LEP1.5 = 130 GeV lep1.5o,lep1.5-2adl and LEP2 = 200 GeV lep1.5-2adl,lep2o, and the lower-energy data by DELPHI delphi70 (□), TASSO (), AMY (), JADE (+), LENA (⋆), and MARK1 () experiments. (See refs. in opalcomp,pdg,biebel for and pp/ data). The solid line shows the calculations from Eq. (<ref>) based on our approach and using the corresponding fits (see text). The dashed and dotted lines show the fit ua5-546 to the pp/ data and the 3NLO perturbative QCD dremin ALEPH fit lep1.5-2adl to data. The arrows show the LHC expectations.
hep
ph0510191-multshea.jpg
0.451709
7ae8ed9ac67a48a9a222174fdc819e13
Pseudorapidity density ρ(0) of charged particles per participant pair (N_ part/2) at midrapidity as a function of the c.m. energy of collision. The open and combined symbols show the pseudorapidity density values c.m. energy per nucleon, , measured in the headon AA collisions by BRAHMS br-rev (◯), PHENIX phx-rev (), PHOBOS ph-rev (□), and STAR star-200 (⋆), and the density values recalculated phx-rev from the measurements taken by CERES/NA45 na45 (+), NA49 na49 (), NA50 na50 () WA98 wa98 (), E802, and E917 ags (). The nuclear data at around 20 GeV and the RHIC data at =130 GeV and 200 GeV are given spread horizontally for clarity. The solid symbols show the pseudorapidity density values c.m. energy /3 as measured in non-single diffractive p̅ p collisions by UA1 ua1 (▪), UA5 ua5-53900,ua5-546 (▴), CDF cdf (▾), and from inelastic pp data from ISR isr-thome (), and bubble chamber fnalmult,fnal-rap205 (∙) experiments (the latter as recalculated in ua5-53900). The solid line connects the predictions from Eq. (<ref>). The dashed line gives the fit to the calculations using the 2nd order log-polynomial fit function analogous to that used cdf in data. The fit function from cdf is shown by the dashed-dotted line. The dotted line shows the linear log approximation of UA5 to inelastic events ua5-53900. The arrows show the LHC expectations. Note that data at = 14 GeV to 200 GeV (not shown) follows the heavy-ion data ph-rev. -.7cm
hep
ph0510191-rap0hepta.jpg
0.438348
4ac0a4c1a91145d9970a239ef2278b90
Illustration of correlations in azimuthal angle ϕ relative to the direction of the leading jet (MidPoint, R=0.7, f_merge=0.75) in the event, jet#1. The angle Δϕ=ϕ-ϕ_ jet1 is the relative azimuthal angle between charged particles and the direction of . The region is defined by 60^∘<|Δϕ|< 120^∘ and . We examine charged particles in the range and and calorimeter towers with , but allow the leading jet to be in the region |η( jet# 1)|<2.
hep
ph0510198-RDF_HERALHC_fig1.jpg
0.451805
35eaf33469924f8896449cc231dc6eec
Data at 1.96 on the density of charged particles, , with and in the region (top) and the region (bottom) for and events defined in Fig. 2 as a function of the leading jet compared with PYTHIA Tune A and tuned JIMMY. JIMMY was tuned to fit the energy density in events (PTJIM=3.25). The data are corrected to the particle level (with errors that include both the statistical error and the systematic uncertainty) and compared with the theory at the particle level (generator level).
hep
ph0510198-RDF_HERALHC_fig10.jpg
0.478345
4387e5c29d2342278e46612f97f9fc91
Data at 1.96 on average transverse momentum, , of charged particles with and in the region for and events defined in Fig. 2 as a function of the leading jet compared with PYTHIA Tune A and tuned JIMMY. JIMMY was tuned to fit the energy density in events (PTJIM=3.25). The data are corrected to the particle level (with errors that include both the statistical error and the systematic uncertainty) and compared with the theory at the particle level (generator level).
hep
ph0510198-RDF_HERALHC_fig11.jpg
0.449325
6358d2937536427ab4ae02d60c92c40a
Illustration of correlations in azimuthal angle ϕ relative to the direction of the leading jet (highest P_T jet) in the event, . The angle Δϕ=ϕ-ϕ_ jet#1 is the relative azimuthal angle between charged particles and the direction of . On an event by event basis, we define () to be the maximum (minimum) of the two regions, 60^∘<Δϕ<120^∘ and 60^∘<-Δϕ<120^∘. and each have an area in space of ΔηΔϕ=4π/6. The overall region defined in Fig. 1 contains both the and the regions. Events in which there are no restrictions placed on the second and third highest P_T jets ( and ) are referred to as events (left). Events with at least two jets with P_T>15 where the leading two jets are nearly () with P_T( jet#2)/P_T( jet#1)>0.8 and P_T( jet#3)<15 are referred to as events (right).
hep
ph0510198-RDF_HERALHC_fig2.jpg
0.415044
9578a54d0a9e434b9627bf73653b2478
Data at 1.96 on the density of charged particles, with and in the region (top) and the region (bottom) for and events defined in Fig. 2 as a function of the leading jet compared with PYTHIA Tune A and HERWIG. The data are corrected to the particle level (with errors that include both the statistical error and the systematic uncertainty) and compared with the theory at the particle level (generator level).
hep
ph0510198-RDF_HERALHC_fig3.jpg
0.418643
61d4ae304083460f96998bd12f54067a
Data at 1.96 on scalar density of charged particles, , with and in the region (top) and the region (bottom) for and events defined in Fig. 2 as a function of the leading jet compared with PYTHIA Tune A and HERWIG. The data are corrected to the particle level (with errors that include both the statistical error and the systematic uncertainty) and compared with the theory at the particle level (generator level).
hep
ph0510198-RDF_HERALHC_fig4.jpg
0.452442
a03a18746b0c4d549dc45c5593e86e54
Data at 1.96 on average transverse momentum, , of charged particles with and in the region for and events defined in Fig. 2 as a function of the leading jet compared with PYTHIA Tune A and HERWIG. The data are corrected to the particle level (with errors that include both the statistical error and the systematic uncertainty) and compared with the theory at the particle level (generator level).
hep
ph0510198-RDF_HERALHC_fig5.jpg
0.414405
a6de89df45d34b26a39b3ec884ccf5b0
Data at 1.96 on scalar density, , for particles with in the region (top) and the region (bottom) for and events defined in Fig. 2 as a function of the leading jet compared with PYTHIA Tune A and HERWIG. The data are corrected to the particle level (with errors that include both the statistical error and the systematic uncertainty) and compared with the theory at the particle level (generator level).
hep
ph0510198-RDF_HERALHC_fig6.jpg
0.400898
45ccf125f64c47819f6e507dc968cd10
Data at 1.96 on the difference of the and regions ( = - ) for and events defined in Fig. 2 as a function of the leading jet compared with PYTHIA Tune A and HERWIG. The data are corrected to the particle level (with errors that include both the statistical error and the systematic uncertainty) and compared with the theory at the particle level (generator level).
hep
ph0510198-RDF_HERALHC_fig7.jpg
0.412466
61809f45932543459d5d5fa39671bfb2
Data at 1.96 on scalar density, , for particles with in the region (top) and the region (bottom) for and events defined in Fig. 2 as a function of the leading jet compared with PYTHIA Tune A and tuned JIMMY. JIMMY was tuned to fit the energy density in events (PTJIM=3.25). The data are corrected to the particle level (with errors that include both the statistical error and the systematic uncertainty) and compared with the theory at the particle level (generator level).
hep
ph0510198-RDF_HERALHC_fig8.jpg
0.425658
b1b0fd15ff32495792b9ce71ee0617d7
Data at 1.96 on scalar density of charged particles, , with and in the region (top) and the region (bottom) for and events defined in Fig. 2 as a function of the leading jet compared with PYTHIA Tune A and tuned JIMMY. JIMMY was tuned to fit the energy density in events (PTJIM=3.25). The data are corrected to the particle level (with errors that include both the statistical error and the systematic uncertainty) and compared with the theory at the particle level (generator level).
hep
ph0510198-RDF_HERALHC_fig9.jpg
0.448332
2298967020c44feebe5c689996ffcbf4
Schematic view of the algorithm of parallelized DICE with distributing the random numbers into workers, w1, w2, w3 and w4, for example. Each worker is responsible for the part of random numbers in the routines, random1 and random2. The total number of random numbers is the sum of random numbers treated in each worker as N_total = n1 + n2 + n3 + n4.
hep
ph0510205-figure1.jpg
0.429996
b17a7d0f498b4de987e597576300b244
Schematic view of the algorithm of Parallelized DICE. Each worker is responsible for the part of hypercubes.
hep
ph0510205-figure2.jpg
0.516271
9888686eabee4b2c9865e11b3b1739a6
Charged current self energy Σ_a(ω,k) with a=1,2 corresponding to mass eigenstate neutrinos in the fermion line. The external lines correspond to e,μ charged leptons with frequency ω and momentum k.
hep
ph0510214-selfenergy.jpg
0.420632
da132463cc6142c49d92ecff82419cdf
Off diagonal charged lepton self energy: (a) one loop W-boson exchange, (b) self-energy in the effective Fermi theory.
hep
ph0510214-selfflav.jpg
0.52298
e857ef5926914febaf9e1186d8b217bb
Representative leading-order Feynman diagrams for (a) t-channel, and (b) s-channel production of a single top quark.
hep
ph0510224-fig1.jpg
0.464988
72fe78c43584407f84da282900b86582
Cosine of the angle (cosθ^t_ej_1) between the charged lepton and final-state jet j_1 in the top-quark rest frame, before and after the cut cosθ^t_eb < cosθ^t_ej_1. The t-channel and s-channel single-to-quark distributions are the same after cuts. The Wjj and Wbb̅ distributions go from approximately flat to very similar to the t-channel distribution before cuts.
hep
ph0510224-fig10.jpg
0.415005
47f241618df3479baa6eaef84b02bcd9
Correlated angular distributions of the final-state particles in the top-quark rest frame of t-channel single-top-quark production at NLO (top), and the difference between NLO and LO (bottom). This is a two-dimensional projection between cosθ^t_ej_1, where e is the charged lepton and j_1 is tagged as the highest-E_T light-quark jet, and cosθ^t_bj_1, where b is the b jet from the top-quark decay.
hep
ph0510224-fig12.jpg
0.447837
d3b50a058dc040279a8cbdbd87b07112
Correlated angular distributions of the final-state particles in the top-quark rest frame of t-channel single-top-quark production at NLO (top), and the difference between NLO and LO (bottom). Same as Fig. <ref>, but projecting on cosθ^t_ej_1 and cosθ^t_eb.
hep
ph0510224-fig13.jpg
0.502673
ae8d9c67516749408090ad7e14563e4d
Correlated angular distributions of the final-state particles in the top-quark rest frame of t-channel single-top-quark production at NLO (top), and the difference between NLO and LO (bottom). Same as Fig. <ref>, but projecting on cosθ^t_eb and cosθ^t_bj_1.
hep
ph0510224-fig14.jpg
0.427042
9f4596d6c1644cc0ae6647c9478efbbc
Correlated angular distributions of the final-state particles in the top-quark rest frame of s-channel single-top-quark production at NLO. Labels are the same as in Fig. <ref>.
hep
ph0510224-fig15.jpg
0.52551
8ad059308a4247cd90de9a9db29b881d
Correlated angular distributions of the final-state particles in the top-quark rest frame of s-channel single-top-quark production at NLO. Same as Fig. <ref>, but projecting on cosθ^t_ej_1 and cosθ^t_eb.
hep
ph0510224-fig16.jpg
0.472273
5adb7baae4b34facb768926d6d183a7e
Correlated angular distributions of the final-state particles in the top-quark rest frame of s-channel single-top-quark production at NLO. Same as Fig. <ref>, but projecting on cosθ^t_eb and cosθ^t_bj_1.
hep
ph0510224-fig17.jpg
0.499709
d2d0562a3f50413cba4f598f4090d4ac
Correlated angular distributions of the final-state particles in the reconstructed top-quark rest frame of Wjj production at NLO. Labels are the same as in Fig. <ref>.
hep
ph0510224-fig18.jpg
0.537776
408eda4abde24b4e814f7a0c631dfe60
Correlated angular distributions of the final-state particles in the reconstructed top-quark rest frame of Wjj production at NLO. Same as Fig. <ref>, but projecting on cosθ^t_ej_1 and cosθ^t_eb.
hep
ph0510224-fig19.jpg
0.403921
1f341430852c478ea7dae2191d50f694
Decay products of the top quark, and the angle θ^t_ŝ e^+ between the charged lepton e^+ and the spin ŝ_t of the top quark in the top-quark rest frame. It is convenient to choose the spin to be projected in the direction of the down-type quark d in the event.
hep
ph0510224-fig2.jpg
0.562052
39c2ff02887e4a00b0dfece07935f326
Correlated angular distributions of the final-state particles in the reconstructed top-quark rest frame of Wjj production at NLO. Same as Fig. <ref>, but projecting on cosθ^t_eb and cosθ^t_bj_1.
hep
ph0510224-fig20.jpg
0.377287
285687cf8bd2453993c07b6796a80acc
Correlated angular distributions of the final-state particles in the top-quark rest frame of s-channel single-top-quark production at NLO. Same as Fig. <ref>, but projecting on cosθ^t_ep̅ and cosθ^t_ej_1, where p̅ is the incoming antiproton.
hep
ph0510224-fig21.jpg
0.424128
d3d6bdedce1e4bcdbaa8f258e3556d2f
Correlated angular distributions of the final-state particles in the reconstructed top-quark rest frame of Wjj production at NLO. Labels are the same as in Fig. <ref>.
hep
ph0510224-fig22.jpg
0.486053
0d96f9c41d7845eca9c89d5e9c19b43f
Invariant mass of the identified b-jet and highest-E_T jet j_1 from t- and s-channel single-top-quark, Wjj, and Wbb̅ production.
hep
ph0510224-fig23.jpg
0.531583
44954fff4b624ff3a0c059a5dfe4a094
Cosine of angle (cosθ^t_ej_1) between the charged lepton and highest-E_T light-quark jet in the top-quark rest frame of t-channel single-top-quark production at LO and NLO. The lepton isolation cut suppresses events at large cosθ^t_ej_1. A nearly angle-independent underlying contribution comes from misidentification of which jet contains the down-type quark.
hep
ph0510224-fig3.jpg
0.481702
f926a6a3043c4f05843f2aaf65c0fd09
Cosine of angle (cosθ_ej_1) between the charged lepton and highest-E_T light-quark jet j_1 in the lab frame and top-quark rest frame of single-top-quark production at NLO.
hep
ph0510224-fig4.jpg
0.478699
c26a69447cb04db0a04b85972423570b
Cosine of the angle (cosθ^t_ep̅) between the charged lepton and antiproton in the top-quark rest frame of s-channel single-top-quark production at LO at the Fermilab Tevatron (a 1.96 TeV pp̅ collider). The solid line corresponds to reconstructing the top-quark frame using the exact neutrino and b-jet from the top-quark decay. The dashed line uses the missing transverse energy and W mass to fit a putative neutrino momentum. The dotted line adds the effect of using a randomly chosen b-jet. The rescaled NLO cross section with a randomly chosen b jet is indicated by open circles.
hep
ph0510224-fig5.jpg
0.427553
c77d79a0dc034e90bbeea9d67447ab6e
Cosine of angle (cosθ^t_ej_1) between the charged lepton and highest-E_T light-quark jet j_1 in the M_Wb rest frame of Wbb̅ (solid), and Wjj (dashed) production at LO, where one of the two highest-E_T jets is randomly tagged as a b-jet, and the other is j_1. The NLO cross sections are shown scaled to the LO cross sections.
hep
ph0510224-fig6.jpg
0.408779
46261bedc75948bfb1607f2277f691b6
Cosine of angle (cosθ^t_ep̅) between the charged lepton and antiproton in the M_Wb rest frame of Wbb̅ (solid), and Wjj (dashed) production at LO, where one of the two highest-E_T jets is randomly tagged as a b-jet. The NLO cross sections are shown scaled to the LO cross sections.
hep
ph0510224-fig7.jpg
0.438605
cf44c0d1af8546a7aebd5705b7b40e77
Cosine of the angle (cosθ^t_eb) between the charged lepton and final-state b quark in the top-quark rest frame. The t-channel and s-channel single-to-quark distributions are the same, since they both involve a real top-quark decay. The Wjj and Wbb̅ distributions appear similar to real top-quark decay because of the boost into the top-quark rest frame.
hep
ph0510224-fig8.jpg
0.435679
4fda18e113204289b63f1b6b986903be
Particles in the final state of single-top-quark production, in the top-quark rest frame. The angle between the charged lepton e^+ and the b quark is expected to be larger than the angle between e^+ and the down-type quark d.
hep
ph0510224-fig9.jpg
0.436431
1e7ce6bdc3f6465abfa57434e628a443
Cancellation of top quadratic divergences.
hep
ph0510225-figone.jpg
0.524282
23fdf4720ffe4bbe94980225dcbe5cba
Examples of diagrams contributing to ρ parameters and Zbb̅ vertex.
hep
ph0510225-figthree.jpg
0.433165
bb513d7dc9c24742bc03d1ea9bff6f7b
Generation of type (II)^' and (III)^' vertices by integrating out the mirror fermions.
hep
ph0510225-figtwo.jpg
0.483504
a35206ca477540acad64e5f85b078621
Production cross sections of T at the LHC as a function of its mass (solid line). For comparison, we also plot the production cross section of t̃_R in SUSY.
hep
ph0510225-xsec_mT.jpg