dedup-isc-ft-v107-score
float64 0.32
1
| uid
stringlengths 32
32
| text
stringlengths 0
32.5k
| paper_id
stringlengths 1
14
| original_image_filename
stringlengths 5
222
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
0.471403 | 4b611e045113498da481cf58ebf922f8 | Schematic diagram of the MERIT experiment at the neutron time-of-flight (nToF) facility at CERN <cit.>. | physics0510157 | Fig2.jpg |
0.463467 | 86f4b1d6c32546abab5a42a1f3aab5df | Drawing of the MICE experiment <cit.>. The beam enters the experiment from the bottom left-hand corner. The beam first passes through one of the scintillator hodoscopes that form the time-of-flight system. After passing through the upstream spectrometer, the beam passes through three absorber/focus-coil modules and two cavity/coupling- coil modules before it passes through the downstream spectrometer and a second time-of-flight hodoscope, the downstream Cherenkov counter and is stopped in the electromagnetic calorimeter. The beamline and upstream instrumentation are not shown. | physics0510157 | Fig3.jpg |
0.415964 | 1414df641aff446c966e2228a808beb0 | The urban pattern of Savannah as it appears in the original map (top-left), and reduced into a spatial graph (top-right). We also report the corresponding MST (bottom-left) and GT (bottom-right). | physics0510162 | LatoraFig1.jpg |
0.387462 | 3549aad750284de4be7f8d0ab6fa3148 | `Ultra black' (left most) signal and six levels of the analog signal coded pixels addresses. | physics0510165 | address.jpg |
0.459714 | e2ce986be273481ab0f00cc45d337364 | Pixel threshold distribution for a single ROC taken with an external calibrate signal (top) and via cross-talk mechanism (bottom). | physics0510165 | bb.jpg |
0.532495 | ba1afa63591041df881b3c42e42145b3 | Threshold difference map (52 × 80 pixels) taken with the `modified external calibration' method applied to a ROC with removed (colored in black) bump bonds. | physics0510165 | bbmap.jpg |
0.393078 | 4bd73406c6264491b7b7432b6421f5cc | A set-up for thermal test of CMS pixel barrel modules | physics0510165 | coolingbox.jpg |
0.435174 | f711dd82b42745f9a0300bb0c3be9f76 | A noise (in electrons) distribution for a single ROC. | physics0510165 | noise.jpg |
0.422399 | fb5a27f1b6df4905b6a0ea6abec112bf | physics0510166 | Finesse.jpg |
|
0.407237 | 423909f621fd4d22a4ade88f1cf43379 | physics0510166 | freefall.jpg |
|
0.446146 | 0e18cd6e49744dc287459a88b75be327 | physics0510166 | guide.jpg |
|
0.497355 | 23b5297cf47c49c7ae44d04119fedd1d | physics0510166 | setup.jpg |
|
0.407159 | dff32021b69647c2ad1fb4526aaec23c | Microscopic characteristics of moving blanks within the wide moving jam shown in Fig. <ref> (a): (a) – Vehicle trajectories in the left (left) and right (right) lanes. (b, c) – Moving blanks at three different locations (b) and three different time moments (c) in the left and right lanes. Trajectories of each 4th vehicle are shown. | physics0510167 | BlanksWide.jpg |
0.415096 | e76c9f330a8f4ababc047c792b3a209f | Moving blanks emergence in the GP shown in Fig. <ref> (a): (a, b) – Vehicle trajectories for different time intervals in the left and right lanes. | physics0510167 | Blanks_GP.jpg |
0.42459 | bd67acb2b0184681bcfcb0791894a666 | Simulations of moving blanks emergence: (a) – Speed in space and time within general pattern (GP) at on-ramp bottleneck in the left (left) and right lanes (right). (b–e) – Speed (b, d) and density (c, e) determined through the use of the density definition (vehicles per freeway length) at different time moments associated with the GP in (a) in the left and right lanes. q_ in= 1714, q_ on= 450 vehicles/h/lane. Model and bottleneck parameters are the same as those in Fig. <ref>. | physics0510167 | Blanks_jam_in_GP.jpg |
0.383489 | 7a3229887b3c489b8039d98219a71d8a | Empirical characteristics of traffic phases: (a, b) – Traffic phases in the flow–density (a) and speed–density (b) planes for data in the left lane together with the line J (a) and the curve J (b) associated with the propagation of the downstream front of the wide moving jam. (c–g) – Traffic phases in the flow–density (c, e, g) and speed–density (d, f, h) planes for improved data in the left (c, d), middle (e, f), and right (g, h) lanes. Moving averaging over the platoon of five vehicles is used. | physics0510167 | Em_Average.jpg |
0.429023 | 137a5ac839be4b038776f8f86130bbf4 | Empirical characteristics of traffic phases: (a, b) – Single vehicle data for speed (a) and time headways (b) for synchronized flow at D10 related to Fig. <ref> (b). (c, d) – Traffic states averaged over five vehicles (moving average) associated with synchronized flow in (a) and with moving blanks within the jam taken from Fig. <ref> (e, f) in the flow–density (c) and speed–density planes (d). Arrows in (a) show time intervals of synchronized flow states used in (c, d). Middle freeway lane. | physics0510167 | Em_Average_Syn.jpg |
0.447336 | a4a5998c74a94f6f875898b976ab748f | Characteristics of moving blanks within the wide moving jam shown in Fig. <ref> (a) together with states of free flow and synchronized flow in the flow–density (a, b, d) and speed–density planes (c, e). Left and right figures are related to the left and right lanes, respectively: (a–c) – States within the jam are determined at detector located at 8.5 km through the formula ρ=q/v in two cases in which all states within the jam measured at the detector are shown (a) and error states are removed (b, c). (d, e) – States within the jam are determined through the density definition (vehicles per freeway length) at time moment 31.5 min. Moving average over five vehicles in vehicle platoons is used. J^ (left) and J^ (right) are the line J (a, b, d) and the associated curve J (c, e) for the downstream jam front in the left and right lanes, respectively. | physics0510167 | Mic_Average.jpg |
0.421132 | a9f906bc0437421199b81e780e3ed23b | Simulations of moving blanks within a wide moving jam propagating through an on-ramp bottleneck. (a) – Speed in space and time on the main road. (b–d) – Single vehicle data for time dependencies of speed (b), time headways (c), and the associated density distributions calculated through the density definition (curves 1) and the formula ρ=q/v (curves 2) (d) at the location 8.5 km. Left and right figures (a–d) are related to the left and right lanes, respectively. In (d) for density calculation, a moving averaging over the platoon of five vehicles is performed. To use the density definition by calculations of curves 1 in (d), at a time moment when one of the vehicles has just been detected at the location 8.5 km the density within a vehicle platoon is calculated. This platoon consists of the detected vehicle and two vehicles upstream and two vehicles downstream. In contrast, calculations of curves 2 in (d) are performed as in empirical observations in Fig. <ref>, i.e., the flow rate q and average speed v of the platoon passing the location are used in the formula ρ=q/v. (e, f) – Speed (e) and density (f) related to (a) as functions of distance at the time moment 31.5 min in the left and right lanes. Model for heterogeneous traffic of Sect. 20.2 in <cit.> with 80% fast and 20% long vehicles; τ^(a, j)_ del(v)=τ /p^(j)_0(v), p^(j)_0(v)=(a^(j) +b^(j)min(1, v/10)), j= 1,3; a^(1)=0.565, b^(1)=0.085 for fast vehicles (j= 1), and a^(3)=0.3, b^(3)=0.18 for long vehicles (j= 3). q_ in= 1565, q_ on= 337 vehicles/h/lane. q_ out= 1900 and q_ out= 1100 vehicles/h in the left and right lanes, respectively. On-ramp location is x_ on= 10 km, on-ramp merging region length is L_ m= 300 m. The wide moving jam is exited by local perturbations applied in both lanes; perturbation duration T^( pert) and their location Δ x^( pert) downstream of the end of the on-ramp merging region are: (3 min, 1250 m). | physics0510167 | Mic_Cr_wide.jpg |
0.44792 | 75dea975ba884bf4b62966241c4f708e | Microscopic features of moving jam propagation: (a) – Speed on the main road in time and space related to a dissolving general pattern (DGP) that emerges spontaneously at an on-ramp bottleneck. (b) – Speed within a platoon of seven vehicles propagating through the wide moving jam and synchronized flow phases formed in the DGP; speed is averaged over the vehicle platoon. Solid curve in (a) shows the average trajectory associated with platoon propagation. (c) – Vehicle trajectories within the DGP in which the vehicle platoon related to (b) is marked by solid block. (d, e) – Flow–density (d) and speed–density relationships (e) associated with the platoon of seven vehicles going through the wide moving jam and synchronized flow phases related to the DGP in (a–c). Single-lane model of identical vehicles (Sect. 16.3 of Ref. <cit.>). q_ in= 1946, q_ on= 345 vehicles/h. x_ on= 10 km, L_ m= 300 m. In (c) trajectories of each 10th vehicle are shown. | physics0510167 | Mic_fronts_wide.jpg |
0.440811 | 5ec1b4aec01f4cb2a1e5be142159a70f | Simulated flow–density (a, c) and speed–density relationships (b, d) of two different platoons of seven vehicles going through the wide moving jam and other traffic phases within the DGP shown in Fig. <ref> (a). (e) – Empirical flow–density relationships in the left and middle lanes associated with the wide moving jam in Fig. <ref>. (f, g) – Simulated flow–density (f) and speed–density relationships (g) associated with moving averaging of speed v and flow rate q within platoons of seven vehicles going through a virtual detector at x= 8 km within the DGP shown in Fig. <ref> (a). | physics0510167 | Mic_fronts_wide_detectors.jpg |
0.437319 | 0fe4feb38ad346a28baa17b606b1e977 | Microscopic structure of narrow moving jams: Empirical single vehicle data for speed within a sequence of two narrow moving jams in the left (left) and right lanes (right) (a) as well as the associated time distributions of time headways τ (b) and of the value 3600/τ^ (gross) (c) related to Fig. <ref> (e). | physics0510167 | NarrowJam.jpg |
0.512462 | fb86fd7fb7384d889a96692c1de379f7 | Macroscopic characteristics of empirical single vehicle data measured on the freeway A5-South (a, b) and on the freeway A92-West (c–e): (a) – Sketch of detector arrangement of a section on the freeway A5-South. (b) – Local traffic dynamics (one-minute average data) of the speed (left) and flow rate (right) in three freeway lanes on December 12, 1995. (c) – Sketch of detector arrangement on a section of the freeway A92-West. (d, e) – Local traffic dynamics (one-minute average data) of the speed (left) and flow rate (right) on July 17, 2000 (d) and August 23, 2000 (e) in both freeway lanes. | physics0510167 | Single_Fig.jpg |
0.446815 | 1e921b52f54d4d5a9323fd27b2703106 | Microscopic structure of wide moving jams: (a–f) – Empirical single vehicle data for speed within a wide moving jam (a, c, e) and the associated time headways (b, d, f) in the left (a, b), middle (c, d), and right lanes (e, f) related to the example at D10 in Fig. <ref> (b). (g) – Time distributions of the value 3600/τ^ (gross) in the left lane. (h) – Probability for time headways in the left lane for free flow (solid curve, 6:20≤ t≤ 6:40), synchronized flow (dashed curve, 8:39≤ t≤ 8:42); moving blanks within the wide moving jam (dotted curve, 8:42< t≤ 8:44). | physics0510167 | WideJam.jpg |
0.75837 | 77e4b13502dd4f3eb4eeb3373479720b | Cross section of a 3D Torus intersecting a plane (bottom) and its orthogonal projection (above), showing its geometric parameters r_θ and r_φ. The arcs φ r_φ and θ r_θ are also shown. | physics0510168 | figure0.jpg |
0.524078 | d7aac8641a9a416292ded5844920569e | Intersection of a 3D torus with the plane (the paper sheet) and the resultant revolution through a polar edge (top) and an equatorial edge (bottom). The revolution of these two projections is on the right side of the figure. The polar revolution will produce a spindle torus which is related to the surfaces B and D, whereas the equatorial revolution is related to the surface A for the deuteron in Fig. 6 reference <cit.>. | physics0510168 | figure1.jpg |
0.999953 | 7cb1b3b5853240c0907ad48168f48463 | Movement of the arc θ r_θ when the arc φ r_φ occurs. | physics0510168 | figure2.jpg |
0.526728 | 025bbbf9e0be4fc2b45d1a0c783525a3 | Measurements of r_θ and r_φ from the torus intersection with the plane | physics0510168 | figure3.jpg |
0.510256 | fe7156bff385459bbfb7eaff3f5ba2ca | Experimental reach for the ratio |C_7^'/C_7| as a function of the Λ_b polarization P_Λ_b for the decays Λ_b→Λ(X)γ→ pKγ, X=1520,1670,1690. For comparison, the corresponding reach of the Λ_b→Λ(1116)γ→ pπγ decay is shown for the reconstruction scenarios (a)–(c) described in the text. The curves indicate the minimum |C_7^'/C_7| accessible at 3σ (standard deviation) significance at a hadron collider experiment after collecting statistics equivalent to 10^4 Λ_b→Λ(1520)γ→ pKγ decays. | hep | ph0702191-fig1.jpg |
0.580536 | 81f4ce9c4c224e5fb279b5c54fb83856 | The Fermi spheres for three non interacting quarks, u, d and s by taking into account the mass of the strange quark (see text). | hep | ph0702192-fig1.jpg |
0.403733 | 9397f4887d4648adb188fba3f0a0d9ce | Free energy of the various phases discussed in the text with reference to the normal phase, named unpaired in the figure. | hep | ph0702192-fig2.jpg |
0.427949 | e05650d83f6546a295c3b79ed5f458c7 | The two Fermi spheres corresponding to q_2 (left arrow) and q_3 (right arrow) respectively parallel and antiparallel. The pairing rings du and us are shown by thin and thick lines respectively. | hep | ph0702192-fig3.jpg |
0.488143 | 1b0181d7109c40c398652d52a92a71ea | The ratio of the gap Δ/Δ_0 for LOFF with three flavors vs. M_s^2/μ. Here Δ_0 is the CFL gap and Δ=Δ_2=Δ_3. | hep | ph0702192-fig4.jpg |
0.395669 | f76d0dc7100442df838157300d935962 | Comparison of the free energy of the various phases already considered in Fig. <ref> (same notations as here) with the LOFF phase with three flavors. | hep | ph0702192-fig5.jpg |
0.506431 | 34406d4906ad498989a1942fc7c036ad | Comparison of the free energy of the various phases already considered in Figs. <ref> and <ref> (same notations as here) with various crystalline structures in the three flavor case. | hep | ph0702192-fig6.jpg |
0.411999 | 523b42a9581944899103b0c0b205971e | Br() vs. Br(). The shaded area represents the experimental 1σ-range for Br(). The model-independent Grossman-Nir bound <cit.> is displayed by the dotted line, while the solid line separates the two areas where Br() is larger or smaller than Br(). | hep | ph0702202-KLKp.jpg |
0.422439 | 99194d5220284427bf36e010cadfed2b | Br(K_L→π^0 e^+e^-) (upper curve) and Br(K_L →π^0 μ^+μ^-) (lower curve) as functions of Br(). The corresponding SM predictions are represented by dark points. | hep | ph0702202-KLllKLnn.jpg |
0.546491 | d315f6a07cd143ab87734f207aba2bae | Br(K_L →π^0 μ^+μ^-) vs. Br(K_L→π^0 e^+e^-). | hep | ph0702202-KmuKe.jpg |
0.40528 | 2f0b854f4d4b45e0a94b4593fcc8d22d | Correlation between the branching ratios for μ→ eγ and μ^-→ e^-e^+e^-. The shaded area represents present experimental upper bounds. | hep | ph0702202-meg-m3e_all.jpg |
0.398982 | b55788d6b47d49b097348535a39c624a | Compatibility plot of the experimental value of sin2β and the prediction from the rest of the UT fit. | hep | ph0702204-Sin2b.jpg |
0.514565 | 031ec077e2c540f4a5a2e6386c72a238 | Compatibility plot between the direct determinations of | V_ub| from exclusive (cross) and inclusive (star) analyses and the rest of the UT fit. | hep | ph0702204-Vub.jpg |
0.447569 | 8701e8342bc04eabb448ec68cc32a8bf | Compatibility plot of the measured value Δ m_s= (17.77 ± 0.12) ps^-1 with the SM expectation from the other constraints of the UT fit. | hep | ph0702204-newpull_dms.jpg |
0.471491 | 38a6f6df65d1403ea8b874887f38577e | The phase diagram of the PNJL model in the chiral limit. The solid (dashed) line denotes the chiral (deconfinement) phase transition respectively. The TCP (bold-point) is located at (T_c=157 ,μ_c=266) MeV. | hep | ph0702206-phase_nl2.jpg |
0.528447 | 793b478f8697475699f70144557d3591 | The chiral χ_mm (dashed-line) and the Polyakov loop χ_ll̅ (solid-line) susceptibilities in the chiral limit as functions of temperature T for μ = 0. | hep | ph0702206-qq_llb2.jpg |
0.606184 | 09d4839326e743c9bed5e2c3cc379b9f | Schematic illustration of the shape of Wilson loops C, corresponding to a qq̅ dipole of size L, oriented along the x_1-direction, which is (i) at rest with respect to the medium (C_ static), (ii) moving with some finite velocity v along the longitudinal x_3-direction (C_ static^ boosted), or (iii) moving with the velocity of light along the x_3-direction (C_ light-like). | hep | ph0702210-wilsonillu.jpg |
0.452958 | 5d58ef11acf64420aa6546115ee6beb2 | (a) Exclusive Higgs production by the fusion of two hard Pomerons; (b) Higgs production, via hard Pomerons, but accompanied by the emission of two undetected gluons; (c,d) background QCD production processes. For (b,c,d) we account for the full set of Feynman diagrams at this order and, moreover, for (b,d) allow for additional soft gluon emission. | hep | ph0702213-hard.jpg |
0.499316 | 6f96778d2d9d4194adb4c3f2b7aeb1c2 | (a) Higgs production by the fusion of two soft Pomerons; (b) background production via soft Pomerons. | hep | ph0702213-soft.jpg |
0.502637 | e7242512422749749f48dcbc818a0012 | 1PI contributions to the one-loop correlators. | hep | ph0702217-1PI.jpg |
0.454875 | 575b5325ed114df4bb49456ff68e3e48 | Transverse momentum spectra of negatively charged particles, K^0, and ϕ-meson (top) and elliptic flow coefficient for pions, K^0, and Λ (bottom), compared to the blast-wave model (red line). The two green lines in the top left plot represent negative pions and kaons, the sum of the two being the red line to be compared to the data. The black and blue points represent the negative and positive pions, respectively. | hep | ph0702219-blast100-0.jpg |
0.475162 | 6ae10d82175147e69e8b2b6d482ff437 | CERES HBT radii squared and the pion-proton displacement (top), HBT cross-terms (middle), and the second Fourier components of the HBT radii vs. emission angle with respect to the reaction plane (bottom), compared to the blast-wave model calculations (red line). The black and blue points represent the negative and positive pions, respectively. | hep | ph0702219-blast100-1.jpg |
0.423627 | e23257293c8844db954fe24f4508c67c | Azimuthal source eccentricity, represented by the normalized second Fourier component of (Φ^*), vs. centrality. The CERES result (black full dots) is much closer to zero than the analogous measurement at the AGS (open red squares) and RHIC (open blue triangles). | hep | ph0702219-fig_R2_vs_centrality.jpg |
0.424827 | 3b7a944368aa4effb0595d2ae61bc108 | Two-dimensional π^-p correlation function C(,) (left) and its slice C() for <50 MeV/c (right). The peak asymmetry in the right hand plot indicates that the proton source is located at a larger radius than the pion source, or that protons are emitted earlier than pions. The asymmetry can be parametrized using Eq. (<ref>). | hep | ph0702219-nonident.jpg |
0.391329 | 8df5b983331e4ba385b2331d90759895 | Relative wavelengths of the three fields B_μ^a, A̅_μ^a, and a_μ^a. | hep | ph0702227-Fields.jpg |
0.467915 | c5301d571575434891dc25e43c398374 | Theoretical distributions for B_d and B_s semileptonic CP-asymmetries, at the LO (light/red) and NLO (dark/blue). | hep | ph0702235-ASL.jpg |
0.450942 | 55357d030d434f739eb384c4e50a927d | Theoretical (histogram) vs experimental (solid line) distribution for ΔΓ_s/Γ_s. The theoretical distribution represents the weighted average between the predictions obtained in the old and new bases. | hep | ph0702235-DGs_ave.jpg |
0.43153 | 91881b9f1b454dc19729179d80fd36b0 | Theoretical (histogram) vs experimental (solid line) distributions of lifetime ratios. The theoretical predictions are shown at the LO (left) and NLO (right). | hep | ph0702235-plot.jpg |
0.426732 | 4211cf9e2d2d4715b49d0dbbfba97b0d | Theoretical distributions for B_d and B_s width differences, at the LO (light/red) and NLO (dark/blue). The distributions are those obtained in the (old) basis { O^q_1, O^q_2}. | hep | ph0702235-plot1_red.jpg |
0.411636 | 4105b9f6ee434bcdac64725cc1be49b7 | Plot of the percentage differences between the asymptotic Drell-Yan cross section and those obtained using expansions of the pdf's of a fixed order κ, shown as a function of κ for the NLO and NNLO cases. We have used the MRST parametric input with μ_0=1 GeV and Q=M_Z. The evolution is based on Candia. | hep | ph0702244-TR_NNLO.jpg |
0.448537 | 33c8c2ec5002437fa9cc71e61aba255b | Factorization vs renormalization scale dependence of the cross section at NNLO at √(S)=14 TeV. The pdf's have been evolved by Candia using the MRST parametric input at μ_0^2=1 GeV^2. | hep | ph0702244-Zcross_MNNLO_50_200_muR.jpg |
0.453098 | f0b3c6dfb3834691a2315f22b062f7d4 | NNLO cross section for Alekhin with the respective pdf's errors at NLO in the 100 GeV region, with Q=μ_F=μ_R and √(S)=14 TeV | hep | ph0702244-Zerror_teo_vs_exp_A_11196e+650.jpg |
0.470481 | 4e6c9647d0df43588fb096cc87cd72cf | NNLO cross section for MRST with the respective pdf's errors at NLO in the 100 GeV region, with Q=μ_F=μ_R and √(S)=14 TeV | hep | ph0702244-Zerror_teo_vs_exp_M_11196e+650.jpg |
0.502565 | e2fd44e8d7064de088181fa98fd45639 | Rapidity distributions obtained by changing 1/2 Q≤μ_F≤ 2 Q. Here we choose Q=M_Z=μ_F. The evolution is based on Candia using MRST grid input with μ_0^2=1.25 GeV^2, while we used Vrap for the calculation of the hard scattering pieces | hep | ph0702244-rapidity_125.jpg |
0.513941 | d8338ffa567d4f39b88261288b04aa9b | Rapidity distributions obtained by changing 1/2 ≤ k_F≤ 2 where k_F=μ_R^2/μ_F^2. Here we choose Q=M_Z=μ_F. The evolution is based on Candia using MRST grid input with μ_0^2=1.25 GeV^2. As before Vrap has been used for the calculation of the hard scattering | hep | ph0702244-rapidity_muR_125.jpg |
0.477447 | 5ced1542ab6e486cb3964943e8878c75 | Non-vanishing diagrams for meson-baryon scattering with intermediate decuplet contributions at threshold. Dashed lines represent Goldstone bosons, full lines represent octet baryons, and double lines represent decuplet baryons. | hep | ph0702246-MBD.jpg |
0.492605 | bb85de9032424abc8e4ea69f5cc9ef48 | Contours of the gravitino abundance Y_3/2 and the BBN constraints on the (m_3/2, T_R) plane, in the case of the new inflation model. The regions surrounded by the thick solid (green) lines are consistent with the BBN constraints (<ref>). We have set the parameters as: δ = 0.1 and κ = 10^-2, varying (λ, k) as (λ, k) = (0.5, 0.1), (1, 0.1), (0.5, 0.01) and (1, 0.01) labeled by (A), (B), (C) and (D), respectively. | hep | ph0702247-contour-allL.jpg |
0.47544 | 40c30e3bd2004b019dbaff3b2c13cbc2 | BBN constraints on λ and k for δ = 0.01,0.1 and 1 (from left to right). The regions below the lines are allowed, in the sense that there exists a set of (m_3/2, T_R) consistent with the BBN results in the range, m_3/2∈ [10^2,10^4]GeV and T_R ∈ [1,10^10]GeV (left panel); m_3/2∈ [10^2,10^4]GeV and T_R ∈ [10^6,10^10]GeV (right panel). | hep | ph0702247-lambda-kL.jpg |
0.414677 | e2fe650bcc834a2e8bbe89aa2b29ed49 | Schematic potential of the scalar component of the Z field. | hep | ph0702247-potentialL.jpg |
0.441851 | 944786c7aaf64e918386eed9cca0abb7 | (Color online) Comparison with charged-kaon production data by the TASSO, TPC, HRS, ALEPH, DELPHI, OPAL, and SLD collaborations. The rational differences between the data and theoretical calculations are shown. The scale is Q=16 GeV for theoretical calculations in the top figure. | hep | ph0702250-kaon-data-1.jpg |
0.454525 | 975671d081da4b9bbed476dc84a7605c | (Color online) Comparison with charged-kaon production data by the TASSO, TOPAZ, DELPHI, and SLD collaborations. The scale is Q=34 GeV for theoretical calculations in the top figure. | hep | ph0702250-kaon-data-2.jpg |
0.437189 | 080f9b135b8745fdaa6055a7980d3976 | (Color online) The NLO fragmentation functions for the kaon, z(D_i^K^++D_i^K^-)/2, are compared with other parametrizations at Q^2=2 GeV^2, 10 GeV^2, and 100 GeV^2. The notations are the same as Fig. <ref>. | hep | ph0702250-kaon-ff-comp.jpg |
0.445665 | 0b4d36c1beaf45f39696e7fa0ec012f9 | (Color online) Fragmentation functions and their uncertainties are shown for K^+ at Q^2=1 GeV^2, m_c^2, and m_b^2. The notations are the same as Fig. <ref>. | hep | ph0702250-kaon-ff-q-1.jpg |
0.508558 | 32349573fd32486689ce75776d409a57 | (Color online) Comparison with charged-pion production data by the TASSO, TPC, HRS, ALEPH, DELPHI, OPAL, and SLD collaborations. The rational differences between the data and theoretical calculations are shown as a function of z. The average scale Q=16 GeV is taken for theoretical calculations in the top figure with the TASSO data. | hep | ph0702250-pion-data-1.jpg |
0.451824 | 3a2b82050c624974a4bf4b0c3c37f261 | (Color online) Comparison with charged-pion production data by the TASSO, TOPAZ, DELPHI, and SLD collaborations. The scale is Q=39 GeV for theoretical calculations in the top figure. | hep | ph0702250-pion-data-2.jpg |
0.482299 | 5e052fad926b4300ac2e8e894b2c1868 | (Color online) The NLO fragmentation functions for the pion, z(D_i^π^++D_i^π^-)/2, are compared with other parametrizations at Q^2=2 GeV^2, 10 GeV^2, and 100 GeV^2. The solid, dashed, dash-dotted, and dotted curves indicate HKNS, KKP, AKK, and Kretzer parametrizations, respectively, in the NLO MS scheme. The HKNS uncertainty bands are shown by the shaded areas. | hep | ph0702250-pion-ff-comp.jpg |
0.409214 | c38c5705e03847699faa6e1277039a60 | (Color online) Fragmentation functions and their uncertainties are shown for π^+ at Q^2=1 GeV^2, m_c^2, and m_b^2. The dashed and solid curves indicate LO and NLO results, and the LO and NLO uncertainties are shown by the dark- and light-shaded bands, respectively. | hep | ph0702250-pion-ff-q-1.jpg |
0.482365 | e6202c1d0a20435d92fa1c5ece5bfc79 | (Color online) Fragmentation functions and their uncertainties are shown for π^+ at Q^2=M_Z^2. The notations are the same as Fig. <ref>. | hep | ph0702250-pion-ff-q-mz.jpg |
0.46709 | 1044d3d534d54416a4bd7f99c5ae6557 | (Color online) Comparison of our NLO results with pion-production data at Q=M_Z without separation on initial partons by the ALEPH, DELPHI, OPAL, and SLD collaborations. | hep | ph0702250-pion-q-data.jpg |
0.398087 | d8a945491dc54443865fc1a550880ce0 | (Color online) Comparison with proton/anti-proton production data by the TASSO, TPC, HRS, ALEPH, DELPHI, OPAL, and SLD collaborations. The rational differences between the data and theoretical calculations are shown. The scale is Q=16 GeV for theoretical calculations in the top figure. | hep | ph0702250-proton-data-1.jpg |
0.458534 | acbaaf7fda5549a19a6c9eb07b1a5793 | (Color online) Comparison with proton/anti-proton production data by the TASSO, TOPAZ, DELPHI, and SLD collaborations. The scale is Q=32 GeV for theoretical calculations in the top figure. | hep | ph0702250-proton-data-2.jpg |
0.493162 | efcb2a7b289b48108612ee901e9c4277 | (Color online) The NLO fragmentation functions for the proton/anti-proton, z(D_i^p+D_i^p̅)/2, are compared with other parametrizations at Q^2=2 GeV^2, 10 GeV^2, and 100 GeV^2. The notations are the same as Fig. <ref>. | hep | ph0702250-proton-ff-comp.jpg |
0.430711 | 60397246c6a447288c0fa5180979d41a | (Color online) Fragmentation functions and their uncertainties are shown for the proton at Q^2=1 GeV^2, m_c^2, and m_b^2. The notations are the same as Fig. <ref>. | hep | ph0702250-proton-ff-q-1.jpg |
0.404906 | 7dd63020637c4a2fa8104668c4e28796 | (Color online) Kinematical range is shown by z and Q (=√(s)) values for the pion data. | hep | ph0702250-zq-pion.jpg |
0.545548 | 487432a3f04e4e9aad82ee88772b89a1 | Point-like and pole diagrams responsible for the B^0→ K^+K^0 matrix element of the current u̅γ_μ(1-γ_5)b, where the symbol ∙ denotes an insertion of the current. | hep | ph0702252-nonres1.jpg |
0.466474 | 8ed568e1643a40599be49b11ff113ab7 | The dispersion relation for the normal quasi-particle and the plasmino for g=0.1 and T/Λ=0.3216. | hep | ph0702253-dis-t03216-g01.jpg |
0.433233 | 58070db76f024ad38d91557e8cee53db | The spectral function ρ_+ for p = 0, g=0.1, and T/Λ=0.3216. | hep | ph0702253-sp-t03216-g01-pp.jpg |
0.622699 | 39d7e92e08a8422eaa536a1dcdc7df2d | The net quark number density fluctuations χ_μμ/Λ^2 as a function of the quark number density n_q across the first order phase transition. The susceptibility χ_μμ was computed in the NJL model along the line of constant temperature T=50 MeV. | hep | ph0702254-chi_mumu2.jpg |
0.473325 | 7f260fe7b78f40c2b89241e2f72dc943 | The net quark number susceptibility χ_μμ/Λ^2 in the stable and meta stable regions, as a function of the quark number density n_q and temperature T. The full line corresponds to the critical temperature T_CEP, and the dashed lines to the temperatures 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 75 and 80 MeV. The dotted line shows the projection of the isothermal spinodal onto the (T,n_q) plane. | hep | ph0702254-chiq2.jpg |
0.456013 | e471e19fcf5c4d4391db5e7ac7c85b55 | The phase diagram of the NJL model in the temperature (T,n_q)-plane. The filled point indicates the CEP. The full lines starting at the CEP represent boundary of the coexistence region in equilibrium. The broken-curves are the isothermal whereas the dotted ones are the isentropic spinodal lines. | hep | ph0702254-phase2.jpg |
0.429414 | d242bd84fa5e471fadd3b8adf2483904 | dBR(ϕ→π^0ηγ)/dm (in unit of GeV^-1) as a function of the π^0-η invariant mass m (in GeV^-1). Solid line shows the best fitted curve for the non-derivative SPP coupling interaction and the dashed line shows the best fitted curve for the derivative one. Experimental data indicated by circles are from the SND collaboration in Ref. <cit.>, and those by filled circles and filled squares are from KLEO collaboration in Ref. <cit.>. | hep | ph0702256-fig04.jpg |
0.471559 | c2a31924b3724d149c56b8ebf9f6c6cd | dBR(ϕ→π^0π^0γ)/dm (in unit of GeV^-1) as a function of the π^0-π^0 invariant mass m (in GeV^-1). Solid line shows the best fitted curve for the non-derivative coupling and the dashed line shows the best fitted curve for the derivative one. Experimental data indicated by circles are from the SND collaboration in Ref. <cit.>, and those by filled circles are from KLEO collaboration in Ref. <cit.>. | hep | ph0702256-fig05.jpg |
0.486672 | 7dba8e9f4c044747bda6d99b23e6d5b1 | .7Evolution of Y_N_1(z), Y_N_1^eq(z) and Y_B-L(z) without initial N_1-abundance. | hep | ph0702261-2hdm1c.jpg |
0.399321 | cf74567e110c4e0a9a9197aeae9f32e3 | .7Evolution of Y_N_1(z), Y_N_1^eq(z) and Y_B-L(z) with initial N_1 at equilibrium. | hep | ph0702261-2hdm2c.jpg |
0.379433 | 91249fe9f88a4fd3abb0e5ac501bdfcb | Left-handed triplet scalar decay contribution diagrams. | hep | ph0702261-DeltaDecay.jpg |
0.406806 | b0572af41a6a4c048f6ff326e46eaf69 | Additional one-loop contribution to right-handed neutrinos decay. | hep | ph0702261-NDecay3.jpg |
0.438283 | 377542766efc4e58882f68b0df793416 | The allowed regions for the grand unifications. | hep | ph0702261-guts.jpg |
0.462731 | 6f8cc2cde18446b483854b1b39579916 | .7SM. m_H' = M_Z_R and M_Δ_L = 6.0×10^9 [GeV]. | hep | ph0702261-rge1c.jpg |
0.475017 | 34b9a589ccdd400ab2e3df9f02fce4b8 | .72HDM. m_H' = 200 [GeV] and M_Δ_L = 1.0×10^10 [GeV]. | hep | ph0702261-rge2c.jpg |
0.483613 | fde2d95c5f2541878dd84ef08bbaa871 | .7SM with an 𝑆𝑈(2)_L triplet. m_H' = M_Z_R and M_Δ_L = 100 [GeV]. | hep | ph0702261-rge3c.jpg |
0.438905 | 0bf2d781fdc14c95a376baab9c7d97c6 | .72HDM with an 𝑆𝑈(2)_L triplet. m_H' = 200 [GeV] and M_Δ_L = 100 [GeV]. | hep | ph0702261-rge4c.jpg |
0.497029 | e7f78f318fd441a59e8a0d710cea0343 | .7Evolution of Y_N_1(z), Y_N_1^eq(z) and Y_B-L(z) without initial N_1-abundance. | hep | ph0702261-sm1c.jpg |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.