dedup-isc-ft-v107-score
float64
0.3
1
uid
stringlengths
32
32
text
stringlengths
1
17.9k
paper_id
stringlengths
8
11
original_image_filename
stringlengths
7
69
0.446291
54c0479daa734a64911fe5caf5e41f35
Principal component analysis (A) and cluster analysis (B) of the comprehensive quality of the 34 edible flower samples. In (A), 4 corresponding colors for A, C, G and R represent flower samples of Asteraceae, Caryophyllaceae, Gentianaceae and Rosaceae, respectively. (B) shows the cluster analysis conducted using the parameter of “Manhattan distance 2.5” in the tool of “heat map with Dendrogram” provided by the software Origin 2021. These 34 edible flower samples were classified into 2 major categories, Ⅰ and II.
PMC10343634
molecules-28-05260-g006.jpg
0.447672
5d2502d4bd284d7395d0c6e330f6ce4d
The 34 edible flower samples used in this study.
PMC10343634
molecules-28-05260-g007.jpg
0.454642
a9550acc86114604aec5f00a234c4398
(a) Unit cell and coordination environment of ZnEu-MOF, solvent water molecules were omitted. (b) Coordination modes of Zn1 and Eu1. (c) Staking diagram of ZnEu-MOF along b axis. (d) Staking diagram of ZnEu-MOF along an axis. (e–g) Coordination modes of H2L. (h) Powder XRD pattern of ZnEu-MOF and the simulated pattern. Infrared spectrum of ZnEu-MOF and H2L ligand. (i) Infrared spectrum of ZnEu-MOF and H2L ligand. (j) The TG and DTG curves of ZnEu-MOF.
PMC10343636
nanomaterials-13-01904-g001.jpg
0.43603
3f42d80ddd024726a655543fa91e33cf
Synthesis process of graft copolymer (GCL).
PMC10343636
nanomaterials-13-01904-g002.jpg
0.45592
a18dc14591ee4ef584a0b3e35a2a1f53
Coordination insertion mechanism of ROP of ε-caprolactone (‡: Transition state).
PMC10343636
nanomaterials-13-01904-g003.jpg
0.389414
63d5e2dee6cb41b0a2d0c1fcd6bfa2cd
Macroscopic mechanical properties, morphology of the pure PCL and composite films: (a) tensile strength, (b) elastic modulus, (c) elongation at break and (d) stress–strain diagrams of pure PCL film and composite films; (e–j) micromorphology of (e) pure PCL and LCF composite films with different GCL ratios: (f) 2 wt%, (g) 4 wt%, (h) 6 wt%, (i) 8 wt%, and (j) 10 wt%.
PMC10343636
nanomaterials-13-01904-g004.jpg
0.406261
34588c2b3fe640a7abb69d0c47e02b08
Physical-chemical properties of PCL and composite films: (a) powder XRD pattern; (b) TG and DTG curves; (c) DSC curves of secondary heating; (d) DSC curves of primary cooling; (e) contact angles.
PMC10343636
nanomaterials-13-01904-g005.jpg
0.459454
894db5d36a964068ad17406c6435e205
Fluorescent properties of composite films: (a) fluorescence of ZnEu-MOF and GCL; (b) fluorescence of composite films; (c) the calculated UV–vis spectrum of ZnEu-MOF; (d–g) molecular frontier orbitals of ZnEu-MOF.
PMC10343636
nanomaterials-13-01904-g006.jpg
0.453093
bbbf518a92914b14a877b8cca05e0f7c
Cytotoxicity studies of GCL-D/PCL and 4 wt% LCF to HEK293T cells. (a) Cell viability at 24 h after treatment; (b) Cell viability 48 h after treatment.
PMC10343636
nanomaterials-13-01904-g007.jpg
0.461708
42e73e64e9e746e0bab0464d32381a87
A plot of the contact angle (θ) on the PTFE surface vs. the logarithm of fraction concentration (log m ). Curves 1–5 correspond the fractions E0, E1, E2, E3 and E4, respectively.
PMC10343909
molecules-28-04943-g001.jpg
0.473524
0d2c1bb4d2b148f8927732a5b10a92b4
A plot of the contact angle (θ) on the PMMA surface vs. the logarithm of fraction concentration (log m ). Curves 1–5 correspond the fractions E0, E1, E2, E3 and E4, respectively.
PMC10343909
molecules-28-04943-g002.jpg
0.465628
059e54dd1f604fd285fe13d69e6499af
A plot of the contact angle (θ) on the glass surface vs. the logarithm of fraction concentration (log m ). Curves 1–5 correspond the fractions E0, E1, E2, E3 and E4, respectively.
PMC10343909
molecules-28-04943-g003.jpg
0.409187
a2ac8b95621e4fe9be6f9237add4961b
Pearson correlation coefficients.
PMC10344755
gr1.jpg
0.482871
d8f1970ea33e4bb18e6ec076d5044909
Principal component versus Eigen value (left) and the principal component versus the proportion (cumulative) (right).
PMC10344755
gr2.jpg
0.484331
e6e4517821944a55a4c10e0bd08fe6df
IsoQuant pipeline outline and characteristics of novel transcripts generated from mouse simulated data.a, Outline of the IsoQuant pipeline. When a reference gene annotation is provided, reads are assigned to annotated isoforms and alignment artifacts are corrected (top). The intron graph is constructed from read alignments (middle) and transcripts are discovered via path construction (bottom). b, F1-score for novel transcripts reported by different tools on simulated ONT (left) and PacBio data (right). c, Precision and recall for novel transcripts reported by different tools on simulated ONT data broken up by expression levels in TPM. TPM bins are presented by dot sizes. d, Precision (left) and recall (right) for novel transcripts reported by different tools on simulated ONT data. e, Same as d, but for simulated PacBio data.Source Data
PMC10344776
41587_2022_1565_Fig1_HTML.jpg
0.406246
36895323c6bf4b20a6b63ba8693035fe
Characteristics of transcripts obtained from real sequencing data.a, Precision, recall and F1-score for novel transcripts generated on real SIRV ONT cDNA sequencing data. b, Consistency of predictions made by different methods on real human ONT cDNA, ONT dRNA and PacBio data.Source Data
PMC10344776
41587_2022_1565_Fig2_HTML.jpg
0.470922
e74a0374318d43e4b54eb8f2446e88ad
BiLMP-coated fiber.a Schematic illustration of BiLMP-coated fiber. The BiLMP-coated fiber consists of two layers: PaLMP (polymer-attached LMP) and CaLMP (carbon nanotube-attached LMP) b Initial conductivity and gauge factor of the BiLMP-coated fibers in comparison to previously reported conductive filler-based fibers. c Images demonstrating the stretchable operation of LEDs attached to the BiLMP-coated fiber before (left) and during (right) stretching. d Images demonstrating the durability of BiLMP-coated fibers upon scrubbing. e Images of various mechanical interactions enabled with BiLMP-coated fibers for 1D bioelectronics (top) and schematic illustration (bottom) demonstrating recording and stimulation interfaces for implantable bioelectronics. Figure 1e was created with BioRender.com.
PMC10345103
41467_2023_39928_Fig1_HTML.jpg
0.464223
cd7022aee1bf40adb768b15060c99e05
Deposition of particle-assembled LMP on 1D substrate with suspension shearing.a Schematic illustration of the incompatibility of LMPs with the dip-coating on fiber. b Schematic illustration of suspension shearing-based coating of LMP on fiber. c Film coverage ratio according to inks with different combinations of additives with suspension shearing. d, Comparison of fill ratio according to the coating technique. Scale bar: 50 µm. e Photograph and SEM image of PaLMP-coated fiber through suspension shearing. Reproducibility: Suspension shearing was conducted six times, and on each occasion, it resulted in a compact coating. Scale bar: 40 µm. Values in c–d represent the mean and the 1.5 IQR (n = 6).
PMC10345103
41467_2023_39928_Fig2_HTML.jpg
0.501548
3ad5973c3cfc4df293dfad711492deb5
Stretchability and mechanical durability of BiLMP-coated fibers.a Initial electrical conductivity comparison of CaLMP, PaLMP, and BiLMP. b, Relative resistance of conductive fibers under strain with respect to the type of coated film (CaLMP, PaLMP, and BiLMP). c Relative resistance of BiLMP-coated fibers under 10,000 strain cycles. d Peel test of each film with commercialized scotch tape. There is no notable peel-off and residue with CaLMP and BaLMP films. e Resistance variation of BiLMP-coated fibers under repeated attachment and detachment of tape. f Electrical current passing through an attached LED and the resistance of the connected BiLMP-coated fiber interconnect under strain. g Photograph of a sewn electrical circuit with a BiLMP-coated fiber. Scale bar: 2 cm. h Image of large-area integration of BiLMP-coated fibers on commercial cloth. i Image of BiLMP fiber-integrated smart clothes.
PMC10345103
41467_2023_39928_Fig3_HTML.jpg
0.492562
4cfd33c3a17840caa857f49ac04e0ad0
Neural recording and stimulation with BiLMP-coated fibers for multifunctional 1D bioelectronics.a Image and illustration of BiLMP-coated recording fiber (BiLMP-R-fiber) for electrophysiological recording. b Electrophysiology recordings of spontaneous activity from CA1 regions with BiLMP-R-fiber before stretching. c Electrophysiology recordings of spontaneous activity from CA1 regions with BiLMP-R-fiber after stretching (20% strain). d Overlapped spike waveforms recorded from the BiLMP-R-fiber before (green) and after (red, 20% strain) stretching. e PCA clustering of spikes recorded from BiLMP-R-fiber before and after stretching. f Cross-sectional image of BiLMP-multifunctional (extracellular recording, optical stimulation, and drug delivery) fiber device (BiLMP-M-fibers). Reproducibility: Suspension shearing was conducted six times, and on each occasion, it resulted in a compact coating. Scale bar represent 100 μm. g Electrophysiology recordings of optically evoked potentials (OEP) with 10 Hz (top), 100 Hz (bottom) optical simulation, simultaneously recorded through BiLMP-M-fibers. h Inhibition of OEP peak potentials with time, after injection of synaptic blocker (CNQX) using BiLMP-M-fibers. Inset: peak-to-peak amplitude of OEP at before/after CNQX injection. Data are presented as mean values +/- SD. Each 180 peaks are used in sampling. i Illustration (left) and image (right) of sciatic nerve electrical stimulation using BiLMP-based stimulation thread devices (BiLMP-S-threads) with simultaneous EMG recording. Scale bar represent 10 mm. j Correlation between peak amplitude of evoked EMG signal and injected charge density from the BiLMP-S-thread. Data are presented as mean values +/- SD. Each 50 peaks are used in sampling. Inset: raw data of EMG signal. Error band is presented as mean values +/- SD. Scale bar represent 300μV (vertical) and 0.01 s (horizontal). The arrow indicates the onset of a biphasic electrical stimulation pulse of 0.1 A/cm2. k Recorded charge injection capacity waveform of the BiLMP-S-thread. Figure 4a, i were created with BioRender.com.
PMC10345103
41467_2023_39928_Fig4_HTML.jpg
0.447831
b0e511f441294a8c81140c3f34f8f7ec
Hierarchy form of the proposed HHAOA optimization algorithm.
PMC10346496
sensors-23-06224-g001.jpg
0.453783
c137b50fd22e48bb902f9f11c533896c
Flowchart of the proposed HHAOA technique.
PMC10346496
sensors-23-06224-g002.jpg
0.452287
851aca0f3c604ad4afc03b8bdd1eb1b2
Real-time schematic of the pressure process plant.
PMC10346496
sensors-23-06224-g003.jpg
0.471123
e43851b9d22b46e49b24fa9dbc7abc08
P&I diagram of the pressure process plant.
PMC10346496
sensors-23-06224-g004.jpg
0.47252
ef550c8f0b914fb580df53229ac42e86
FOPPI controller tuning using HHAOA.
PMC10346496
sensors-23-06224-g005.jpg
0.444208
2d146f0ccfa24fe285d861d7778a82b3
Benchmark functions search space plots.
PMC10346496
sensors-23-06224-g006.jpg
0.481853
fe8f5b9325594056b0056e4d4cd5963f
Convergence performance of all the benchmark functions.
PMC10346496
sensors-23-06224-g007.jpg
0.446375
ea5b9bf9dcdc466c95d2d1f0478bc305
WMN convergence for different algorithms.
PMC10346496
sensors-23-06224-g008.jpg
0.501198
1502afc6dd0e4fd7a409e3f6b8a9848a
WMN network connectivity and its coverage area for various algorithms. (a) Initial Network; (b) AOA Optimized WMN; (c) MFO Optimized WMN; (d) SCA Optimized WMN; (e) GWO Optimized WMN; (f) WOA Optimized WMN; (g) HHO Optimized WMN; (h) HHAOA Optimized WMN.
PMC10346496
sensors-23-06224-g009.jpg
0.455615
e3a0e1ff28d6479194e8bdeaf724b534
Set-point tracking and disturbance rejection analysis for optimal FOPPI controller.
PMC10346496
sensors-23-06224-g010.jpg
0.439331
2260966b9df6433a976416e44c7301ae
Zoomed view of Figure 10 (A) Initial set-point tracking (B) Disturbance rejection performance (C) Control signal during initial set-point (D) Control signal during disturbance rejection.
PMC10346496
sensors-23-06224-g011.jpg
0.469147
81f4d799134040dcaaabbd25aca38cb9
The main function diagram of the delay generator.
PMC10346596
sensors-23-06144-g001.jpg
0.421082
271458e1e4544a1eba8fc1cd6e40acf0
The carry delay chain structure diagram.
PMC10346596
sensors-23-06144-g002.jpg
0.510298
a0c41629b5184feb9841d11c057d0460
The tap signal waveform.
PMC10346596
sensors-23-06144-g003.jpg
0.456092
90d57470f23c4c619ebc358dac94cff7
The structure of the CARRY4 unit and the carry delay chain.
PMC10346596
sensors-23-06144-g004.jpg
0.509466
035e436855414eeeacd68b7a99f80c5b
The structure diagram of the whole device.
PMC10346596
sensors-23-06144-g005.jpg
0.452716
fa3b0b3fe44248759bc8295705b29ee7
The structure diagram of the delay chain function module.
PMC10346596
sensors-23-06144-g006.jpg
0.477137
c3c78f3ff3634e01b14a429612e58fb6
The structure diagram of the register array.
PMC10346596
sensors-23-06144-g007.jpg
0.522351
cb6f184c5eb3464cbf4dca04c2cd060d
The overall working principle diagram.
PMC10346596
sensors-23-06144-g008.jpg
0.499109
261b651ce710488c91bc228d5f3d7c40
The function of the delay compensation module.
PMC10346596
sensors-23-06144-g009.jpg
0.442983
d94e7eb4281a41f183e08f4dcb4a3d3b
The placement of delay chain 1 and delay chain 2.
PMC10346596
sensors-23-06144-g010.jpg
0.404635
066c0ad8dc8d450390416b0b49e4e3bb
The timing simulation waveform of the carry delay chain.
PMC10346596
sensors-23-06144-g011.jpg
0.434207
34f06138c52344ee8668378a3ae1bf5b
Delay chain 1 and the related hardware resource placement.
PMC10346596
sensors-23-06144-g012.jpg
0.499153
d9bec6f90d2945c5b92af1b2b2735eac
A diagram of the input and output of the tri_flag register.
PMC10346596
sensors-23-06144-g013.jpg
0.472313
939b904f59454adba8b5b47e90afc09f
Diagram of the correction of the measurement results of delay chain 1.
PMC10346596
sensors-23-06144-g014.jpg
0.365404
0abd94995abd4339a37dd3abbfeca529
Placement of delay chain 2 and the input registers.
PMC10346596
sensors-23-06144-g015.jpg
0.451906
e12d9b3a500f470083017797f6b90d80
A structure diagram of system clock of the FPGA.
PMC10346596
sensors-23-06144-g016.jpg
0.439718
3e2cf021c6734d6ab71bab682386b6f4
(a) FPGA hardware resource distribution. (b) System clock signal wire placement diagram.
PMC10346596
sensors-23-06144-g017.jpg
0.493027
dc839a8f3aeb4cf487a45eef0e1b5a0a
A diagram of the input data correction of delay chain 2.
PMC10346596
sensors-23-06144-g018.jpg
0.374011
c83667b9bb1a4ff584a7baa0a339f0b0
The first group of experimental data.
PMC10346596
sensors-23-06144-g019.jpg
0.38082
b1abf24d2b4f412783cf57cfba7484cc
The second group of experimental data.
PMC10346596
sensors-23-06144-g020.jpg
0.469902
c8882a28c8dc41dcaf83dbf3f53574d5
An error histogram of the experimental data.
PMC10346596
sensors-23-06144-g021.jpg
0.367586
c46dd0643fb440d89e867de98f430e65
The resource occupancy rate of the FPGA.
PMC10346596
sensors-23-06144-g022.jpg
0.558845
433017bf78d6416e97b7b412bab15aa9
Composite materials fabrication process.
PMC10346752
polymers-15-02870-g001.jpg
0.487234
dadc7d41245141929eb7f416c7077cdc
(a) Methodology for the prototype development and (b) development of a tendon-driven actuator with an integrated triboelectric sensor.
PMC10346752
polymers-15-02870-g002a.jpg
0.458512
6ae9acb8eb6044a5a20ccf82cb277b39
Characterisation of the viscosity of the PU thermoset over time. The viscosity was analysed for pure PU and PU composites.
PMC10346752
polymers-15-02870-g003.jpg
0.471227
cb52d3959b5f4792a61dba98570bd857
SQUID analysis of the MWCNT and magnetite particles. (a) From −50,000 to 50,000 Oe. (b) From −120 to 120 Oe.
PMC10346752
polymers-15-02870-g004.jpg
0.417353
0be9c49b3b4447bfaab9e5d0ed90de88
OM analysis of the organisation of the particles over time under a static magnetic field. (a) Composite with 1 wt.% of MWCNT and (b) 1 wt.% MWCNT + 1 wt.% of magnetite. The images on the left were acquired before cross-linking and on the right 20 min after the cross-linking process started, under the applied magnetic field.
PMC10346752
polymers-15-02870-g005.jpg
0.453824
0781d9e378bd405ba67f22120e03a38e
Magnetic characterisation of the permanent magnets used for the magnetic patterning of the electrodes. (a) Permanent magnets with a magnetic film. (b) Three-dimensional north pole and south pole distribution in the Z axis. (c) Three-dimensional symmetry analysis for the north and south poles in the Z axis.
PMC10346752
polymers-15-02870-g006.jpg
0.42214
497ffb3eb74447f2a1cfcda5b2bfb8d7
Longitudinal images of the magnetic patterns created on the composite samples produced. (a) Composite with 1 wt.% MWCNT/PU, (b) 1 wt.% magnetite/PU and (c) (1 wt.% MWCNT + 1 wt.% magnetite)/PU. (OM, transmission).
PMC10346752
polymers-15-02870-g007.jpg
0.445273
635633516ef84e648e13d47f61294e9c
Cross-section images of the electrodes obtained by OM in transmission: (a) 1 wt.% MWCNT/PU, (b) 1 wt.% magnetite/PU and (c) (1 wt.% MWCNT + 1 wt.% magnetite)/PU.
PMC10346752
polymers-15-02870-g008a.jpg
0.494693
e89a834e12354e68bd94e59ea7ff13bc
Micro CT analysis of the particle distribution inside the PU matrix for (a) 1 wt.% MWCNT/PU, (b) 1 wt.% magnetite/PU and (c) (1 wt.% MWCNT + 1 wt.% magnetite)/PU. The images on the left present the polymeric matrix and the particles, and the images on the right present just the particles.
PMC10346752
polymers-15-02870-g009.jpg
0.505404
7f341e22ef454201907cd4e44a9293e4
Electrical resistance of each electrode for composites with different ratios of magnetite added to 1 wt.% of MWCNT/PU.
PMC10346752
polymers-15-02870-g010.jpg
0.407325
e657cde081f745c18755380bddffab86
Triboelectric sensor characterisation with (a) a PU layer on top, compared with (b) an SR layer on top.
PMC10346752
polymers-15-02870-g011.jpg
0.469303
571dc3e7fb5546878bef0a1caed6d0d7
Soft robotics prototype using a triboelectric sensor (a) catching, (b) holding and (c) releasing an object when pulled away. (d) Output voltage signal at the three different stages (a) catching, (b) holding and (c) releasing an object when pulled away.
PMC10346752
polymers-15-02870-g012.jpg
0.440767
d23d09051c6a47dbac77ce109baf3b06
Flow chart of literature selection. EMA, ecological momentary assessment.
PMC10347474
bmjopen-2022-069523f01.jpg
0.438461
b0dbfff5092840beb37be0d86c964196
Forest plot of eligible studies. Weights are from random-effects model. ES, effect size.
PMC10347474
bmjopen-2022-069523f02.jpg
0.40977
73deeddf2dbc47c494eada745201f3c6
Sensitivity analysis estimating heterogeneity.
PMC10347474
bmjopen-2022-069523f03.jpg
0.38746
2fabb04b163a47efbe0a991384ddce2b
Flow chart for patient selection
PMC10347709
12882_2023_3262_Fig1_HTML.jpg
0.407155
7b4d6097b0954f05a7f99b6e81b51346
Relationship between urinary N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase (uNAG) level and patient histology. (A-E) Association between uNAG level and Oxford classification. *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001. (F) Correlation between uNAG level and global glomerulosclerosis. (G) Correlation between uNAG level and segmental glomerulosclerosis. (H) Correlation between uNAG level and MEST-C score. (I) Correlation between uNAG level and interstitial score; each dot represents a value from an individual patient. Coefficients of correlation (r for Pearson analysis and ρ for Spearman analysis, respectively) and p values are shown
PMC10347709
12882_2023_3262_Fig2_HTML.jpg
0.399934
93377873739645ceb57e389ade64afe8
ROC analysis for models predicting IgAN remission status. (A) In the whole cohort (n = 213). (B) In patients with baseline eGFR ≥ 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 (n = 142). (C) In patients with baseline eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 (n = 71). The blue line represents the model based on clinical data at biopsy alone; the red line represents the model based on the combination of clinical data and uNAG level at biopsy; the yellow line represents the model using baseline clinical data, uNAG level and MEST-C score. Clinical data were MAP, 24-hour proteinuria and eGFR
PMC10347709
12882_2023_3262_Fig3_HTML.jpg
0.479795
25c674ac72094f918b4595ed3f729544
Workflow to deform planning computed tomography (pCT) structure-set to cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and to generate CBCT_REF structure set
PMC10348325
rpor-28-2-224f1.jpg
0.42547
39b1ddca11db4d9bb082be01eccd6a2c
Original treatment plan dose distribution for planning target volume (PTV): PTV-60 and PTV-54 on (A) axial computed tomography (CT) image and (B) coronal CT image, and recalculated dose distribution with rotational error for PTV-60 and PTV-54 on (C) axial cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) image and (D) coronal CBCT image, for a single fraction.
PMC10348325
rpor-28-2-224f2.jpg
0.380611
57e1f0a50c774af6b6dd396c6e8817cb
Dose volume histogram comparison for a single fraction of patient-1 for (A) reference plan (Ref) and rotational error plan (R), (B) reference plan (Ref) and translational error plan (T), and (c) reference plan (Ref) and translational plus rotational error plan (T+R). DVH color: clinical target volume (CTV): CTV-60 (dark blue), CTV-54 (cyan), planning target volume (PTV): PTV-60 (pink),PTV-54 (orange), parotid-right, and parotid-left (yellow), brainstem (brown), spinalcord (cyan), mandible and larynx (dark brown). Dose volume histogram (DVH) marker: reference plan (triangle) and setup error plan (square)
PMC10348325
rpor-28-2-224f3.jpg
0.411212
ab5cfcb0110943ca9f7aa27de6c71513
Box and whisker plot for percentage dose variation ΔD (%) in rotational error (R), translational error (T), and translational plus rotational error (T+R) plans with no correction (NC) and moderate correction (MC) of setup errors for D98%, D95%, D2%, and D0.035cc in clinical target volume (CTV): (A) CTV-60, (B) CTV-54, and planning target volume (PTV) (C) PTV-60, and (D) PTV-54. The cross represents the mean, the line inside the box represents the median, the bottom of the box represents the 25% quartile, the top of the box represents the 75% quartile, the bottom whisker represents the minimum value, the top whisker represents the maximum value, and the dots represent the outlier
PMC10348325
rpor-28-2-224f4.jpg
0.40413
96f7c5112b5f4ba1a7e384a7f7909727
Box and whisker plot for percentage dose variation ΔD (%) in rotational error (R), translational error (T), and translational plus rotational error (T+R) plans with no correction (NC) and moderate correction (MC) of setup errors (A) for D1cc and D0.035cc, in the spinalcord (SC) and brainstem (BS), (B) for Dmean and D50% in the parotid-left (PL) and parotid-right (PR), and (C) for Dmean and D50% in the larynx (LAR), and for D1cc and D0.035cc in the mandible (MAN). The cross represents the mean, the line inside the box represents the median, the bottom of the box represents the 25% quartile, the top of the box represents the 75% quartile, the bottom whisker represents the minimum value, the top whisker represents the maximum value, and the dots represent the outlier
PMC10348325
rpor-28-2-224f5.jpg
0.437678
0734c0e8d6aa49e3a45995e1e1588ce5
Aperture block and range shifter configurations at our institution and aperture block w/and w/o range shifter configurations used in the water phantom validation. (a) Aperture block and range shifter configurations in PBSPT-based SRS. (b) Configurations of the aperture block without range shifters in ConfigA. (c) Configurations of the aperture block with a range shifter in ConfigB.
PMC10350098
nihpp-2307.01416v1-f0001.jpg
0.427301
1e543d0f33c5429db0471f861bb25791
Results of the energy layer validation in homogenous water phantoms with ConfigA. Row (a) are the IDD curves, (b) log PDD curves, and (c) contours of iso-dose contours (20% and 80% of the maximum dose) in the transverse planes. From left to right, columns display the results calculated with aperture openings from 1cm to 4cm, respectively. Blue lines are the results calculated by MCsquare, while orange lines are the results calculated by VPMC.
PMC10350098
nihpp-2307.01416v1-f0002.jpg
0.374326
fe25669c46194facbcc5e163f75246bf
Dose distributions on a transverse plane of patient 5 ((a)-(c)) and patient 7 ((d)-(f)) calculated by VPMC. Red contours are CTVs. Dose profiles are compared in (b) (e) longitudinal direction (horizontal x arrows in (a) and (d)) and (c) (f) lateral direction (vertical y arrows in (a) and (d)). Results with the aperture block from RayStation MC, VPMC, and MCsquare are in green, blue and purple, respectively.
PMC10350098
nihpp-2307.01416v1-f0003.jpg
0.423464
a8b7511701f443c8a326fe500bf44781
Experimental workflow and MS processing. A) Overview of cohort and sample processing. B) Distribution of duplicate CV before (red) and after (blue) filtering of robustly measured peptides; dotted lines indicate median. C) Principal component analyses before and after ComBat batch correction of the data. Dots represent individual samples and are colored by their corresponding batch.
PMC10350182
nihpp-rs3073597v1-f0001.jpg
0.429601
0eab71e272a64fe4a134f6ce1353cae0
Overview of differentially abundant peptides in CSF in AD. A) Overview of differentially expressed peptides between DEM-AD and any non-AD group. B) MS-intensity levels of 4 peptides differentially expressed in an AD specific pattern (ALDOA: Aldolase-A, BASP1: Brain acid soluble protein 1, PKM: Pyruvate kinase muscle). Red lines indicate mean. C) STRING-DB cluster highlighting the enrichment of proteins involved in energy metabolism in AD CSF. Blue indicates proteins from the GO-term “canonical glycolysis”.
PMC10350182
nihpp-rs3073597v1-f0002.jpg
0.441635
f1e48863d8ef43ee8367b21ecb41c54c
Immunoblotting of ALDOA and PKM indicate the presence of full-length proteins in CSF. A) Normalized band intensities of ALDOA and PKM follow similar intensity pattern across groups as their tryptic peptides (*: p < 0.05). B) MS-intensity of tryptic peptides of both ALDOA and PKM are correlated with the normalized band intensity indicating presence of full-length proteins in CSF.
PMC10350182
nihpp-rs3073597v1-f0003.jpg
0.444129
7e1502a0e20b4816955f574fd2da8db1
Measures of metabolites in CSF. A) Levels of glucose and lactate in CSF across groups. (*: p < 0.05) B) MS intensities for ALDOA and PKM peptides correlate negatively with the CSF glucose and lactate levels. C) Peripheral glucose metabolism marker HbA1c did not show a strong correlation with MS intensities for ALDOA and PKM peptides.
PMC10350182
nihpp-rs3073597v1-f0004.jpg
0.404657
642aecfd1c7f4a6787fa2d5bf1c3124b
Levels of glycolytic enzymes are generally elevated in AD in CSF and brain tissue. Colors represent scaled peptide or protein abundance across all proteins for each individual dataset.†: DEx compared to MCI-AD, *: DEx compared to DEM-AD, #: DEx compared to AD in tissue.
PMC10350182
nihpp-rs3073597v1-f0005.jpg
0.426121
ca838dde9a1645e0a9566cd6ba348579
CONSORT flow diagram
PMC10350277
40364_2023_494_Fig1_HTML.jpg
0.445462
5ad9248e5550434a8565169a485b8866
Type of magnetic resonance images acquired for the study: (A) T1-weighted image; (B) T2-weighted image. The segmented region of interest is also displayed
PMC10350277
40364_2023_494_Fig2_HTML.jpg
0.447534
0955ba29a4ba4e15afd5ddb5f11dd085
Features selection process
PMC10350277
40364_2023_494_Fig3_HTML.jpg
0.413648
1c5daf80887645c2a2e6fbe6a5094ee2
Radiomic model. (A) Kaplan-Meier curves for the retrospective dataset (n = 123 patients, used for model training). (B) Kaplan-Meier curves for the prospective dataset (n = 108 patients, used for model testing). For comparison, a follow-up time of 36 months was displayed. Shadows represent 95% confidence interval
PMC10350277
40364_2023_494_Fig4_HTML.jpg
0.470558
4ae78cd83fb4421d8a95d641a873691b
Comparison of the prognostic performance of the radiomic model with the clinical tumor-node-metastasis (cTNM) stage and pathological tumor-node-metastasis (pTNM) stage on the prospective subset 1 (n = 75 prospective patients). (A/B) Kaplan-Meier curves for the cTNM/pTNM, with low-risk corresponding to cTNM/pTNM stage = III and high-risk corresponding to cTNM/pTNM stage = IV. Shadows represent 95% confidence interval. (C) Kaplan-Meier curves for the radiomic signature. Shadows represent 95% confidence interval. (D) Concordance indexes (C-index) for the cTNM, pTNM and radiomic signatures. *p < 0.05 (Kruskal-Wallis with Tukey-Kramer correction)
PMC10350277
40364_2023_494_Fig5_HTML.jpg
0.388788
02a45399ef0941038344c8d900f9b4a8
Comparison of the prognostic performance of the radiomic model with 7 prognostic genomic signatures and the clinical tumor-node-metastasis stage (cTNM) in terms of concordance index (C-index), on the prospective subset 2 (n = 90 prospective patients). Grey boxplots: C-index of the 7 genomic signatures; blue boxplot: C-index of the cTNM staging; red boxplot: C-index of the radiomic signature (Rad). The C-index of the radiomic model was significantly different (Kruskal-Wallis p < 0.001, with Tukey-Kramer correction) from that of the cTNM staging and of 6 over 7 genomic signatures (G-1, G-2, G-4, G-5, G-6 and G-7). No statistical difference was found between the C-index of the radiomic signature and G-3
PMC10350277
40364_2023_494_Fig6_HTML.jpg
0.439553
ff3c74a6bfbd401297ad4c8e9ec927a5
Radiomic signature distributions in patients classified according to the pathologic tumor-node-metastasis stage (pTNM = III – IVa – IVb). *p < 0.05 (Kruskal-Wallis, with Tukey-Kramer correction). n = 37 patients presented pTNM = III; n = 76 patients presented pTNM = IVa; n = 64 patients presented pTNM = IVb.
PMC10350277
40364_2023_494_Fig7_HTML.jpg
0.418309
9541c221ad6a4c3d855c26ed30b40f49
Maximum likelihood phylogenetic reconstruction of Methanobacterium metagenome assembled genomes based on 76 archaeal marker genes (Lee, 2019). The well and depth from which each MAG was collected is denoted in the sample name, along with the MAG ID. The MAGs are color-coded based on their population designation: blue = type II, green = mixed, yellow = type I. Bootstrap values ≥ 90% out of 1,000 bootstraps are denoted with black circles. Methanosarcina barkeri representatives were chosen as the outgroup.
PMC10350532
fmicb-14-1205558-g001.jpg
0.480133
c3d9b3a8ec2e400299753a93ca7a5f4a
Visual depiction of the pangenome of Methanobacterium-affiliated metagenome assembled genomes (MAGs) recovered from subsurface fracture fluids from the Samail Ophiolite, Oman. The inner radial dendrogram shows the 3,125 protein-encoding genes homologs in the pangenome, clustered by presence/absence across MAGs. The 8 MAGs of the three different population “types” are plotted on the innermost 8 layers (270° arcs), ordered and spaced to reflect groupings based on genomic composition. The presence of gene clusters are indicated by filled and colored bars; unshaded bars indicate the lack of a gene cluster in a MAG. Gene clusters belonging to the core genome shared across all MAGs and environmental accessory genomes are binned and labeled with the according specificity on the outside of the outermost layer. The top right portion above the pangenome contains relevant information for each MAG, with the y-axis limits contained within the parentheses. The relative abundance is representative of each Methanobacterium MAG’s percentage of overall reads within its corresponding metagenome.
PMC10350532
fmicb-14-1205558-g002.jpg
0.459604
b6f5fa1b471c4c7aae0604ce2c44509a
The number of genes within each Methanobacterium population’s accessory metagenome assembled genome. The COG20 Category is listed on the y-axis and the x-axis denotes the number of genes that make up the category. The full list of genes found in the top categories of each population can be found in Supplementary Table 4.
PMC10350532
fmicb-14-1205558-g003.jpg
0.398771
a5f57a9095ed4dfe822e2d3407fcf42d
The gene copy number of genes (rfaB and wcaA) encoding glycosyltransferase in the accessory metagenome assembled genomes of each Methanobacterium population. The full list of genes within the accessory genome of each population can be found in Supplementary Table 4.
PMC10350532
fmicb-14-1205558-g004.jpg
0.459207
23ee72fe738d4fb0802426280693cff2
(A) The gene copy number of genes involved in transport mechanisms for various metabolites. The x-axis denotes the gene and are faceted (above) into custom transporter categories. The y-axis represents each MAG at the depth in which it was collected and is faceted (on the right) from the borehole in which it was sampled and the Methanobacterium population it belongs to. Each dot is also sized by the gene copy number. (B) The presence or absence of additional transporter genes across each population type. The presence of a gene is indicated by a filled in dot and represents all MAGs within the population containing the presence of the gene. The x-axis represents the transporter genes and are faceted (above) into custom categories. The y-axis represents the Methanobacterium population.
PMC10350532
fmicb-14-1205558-g005.jpg
0.390638
fcd196a4510b497f87d09a7aa60c0cc7
The different enzymatic pathways for the core methanogenesis pathway (gray), hydrogenetrophic (tan), acetoclastic (purple), formatotrophic (red) or steps involving conversion of bicarbonate into CO2 for methanogenesis (black). Carbon substrates, intermediates, and products appear in rectangular boxes, while enzymes are in black lettering next to arrows that point in the direction of their end product. Dashed arrows indicate the potential use for the pathway to allow for intracellular CO2 to be generated and subsequently reduced to CH4. The enzymatic component of heterodisulfide reductase (hdr) is included in both formatotrophic and hydrogenetrophic pathways because each due to its similar function, but does not represent a different gene. The bottom of the figure contains a presence/absence diagram, where circles are filled in to represent the presence of a gene in the respective pathway and a white, unfilled circle indicates the absence of a gene. The rows of the presence/absence diagram are representative of each Methanobacterium population. Figure inspired by Carr et al. (2018). Genes: fwd, formylmethanofuran dehydrogenase; ftr, formylmethanofuran:H4SPT formyltransferase; mch, methenyl-H4SPT cyclohydrolase; mtd, F420-dependent methylene H4SPT dehydrogenase; mer, F420-dependent methylene-H4SPT reductase; mtr, methyl-H4SPT:coenzyme M methyltransferase; mcr, methyl-coenzyme M reductase; ack, acetate kinase; pta, phosphate acetyltransferase; acs, acetyl-CoA synthetase; cdh, carbon monoxide dehydrogenase; fdh, formate dehydrogenase; hdr, heterodisulfide reductase; mvh, methyl viologen-reducing [NiFe]-hydrogenase; frh, coenzyme F420 [NiFe]-hydrogenase; F420, coenzyme F420. Carbon compounds: CO2, carbon dioxide; formyl-MFR, formyl-methanofuran; formyl-H4SPT, formyl-tetrahydrosarcinapterin; methenyl-H4SPT, methenyl-tetrahydrosarcinapterin; methylene-H4SPT, methylene-tetrahydrosarcinapterin; methyl-H4SPT, methylene-tetrahydrosarcinapterin; methylene-S-CoM, 2-(Methylthio)ethanesulfonate; Acetyl-CoA, acetyl-Coenzyme A; Acetyl-PO4, acetylphosphate; CH3COO−, acetate; HCOO−, formate.
PMC10350532
fmicb-14-1205558-g006.jpg
0.403284
e5dd655548554b1b9b923f4bc9a9dcbf
Child/adolescent vaccination coverage (≥ 1 dose) and parental intent to get children vaccinated, by child age/adolescent group, United States, household Pulse Survey, September 14–November 14, 2022.
PMC10351440
IANN_A_2232818_F0001_C.jpg
0.40275
bfc4c5e2c1d9478fa274b8a36b749a90
TLR signaling pathways.
PMC10351979
fendo-14-1124334-g001.jpg
0.438918
f60cb7a32fbe40e387812b114618af6e
NLRP3 inflammasome pathway.
PMC10351979
fendo-14-1124334-g002.jpg