text
stringlengths 1
1.59M
| meta
dict |
|---|---|
hi, y'all. i haven't really been in communication with you, just watching from afar, but wanted to let you know that i am thinking about you.
please let me know where you land.
jamie
Jamie Ginsberg
Ag Financial Risk Management
203/761.2329
[email protected] | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
TELEPHONE NUMBERS: (281) 297-5146 & (281) 297-5147
FAX NUMBERS: (281) 297-5148, (281) 297-5149, & (281) 297-5150
THESE NUMBERS WILL BE ACTIVE DURING THE CONFERENCE. SHOULD YOU NEED TO SEND
A FAX PRIOR TO THE CONFERENCE, THE MAIN FAX NUMBER TO THE WOODLANDS IS:
(281) 364-6234.
AGAIN, SHOULD ANY OF THESE NUMBERS CHANGE, WE WILL CONTACT PAT RADFORD IN THE
HOUSTON OFFICE. HER TELEPHONE NUMBER IS (713) 853-9282. IN THE EVENT YOU
CANNOT REACH PAT, THE MAIN NUMBER TO THE WOODLANDS CONFERENCE CENTER IS (281)
367-1100. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Blackout Busters, Business Continuity & Energy Committee Representatives...
attached are minutes from a PG&E meeting on April 2. Barbara Barkovich
asked that I forward this document to you. Please review. Laura
From: "Thomson, Chad" <[email protected]>
To: "'Abbas M. Abed (E-mail)'" <[email protected]>, "'Andy Law (E-mail)'"
<[email protected]>, "'Barbara Barkovich (E-mail)'"
<[email protected]>, "'Barry Flynn (E-mail)'" <[email protected]>,
"'Bobby J. Campo (E-mail)'" <[email protected]>, "'Byron Woertz
(E-mail)'" <[email protected]>, "'Catalin Micsa (E-mail)'"
<[email protected]>, "'Cecilia Vasquez (E-mail)'"
<[email protected]>, "'Charles Magee (E-mail)'"
<[email protected]>, "'Chi Doan (E-mail)'" <[email protected]>, "'Dan Wood
(E-mail)'" <[email protected]>, "'Danielle Dowers (E-mail)'"
<[email protected]>, "'David Marcus (E-mail)'" <[email protected]>, "'Dilip
Mahendra (E-mail)'" <[email protected]>, "'ED FRANCIOSA (E-mail)'"
<[email protected]>, "'Garry L Chinn (E-mail)'" <[email protected]>, "'Greg Pohl
(E-mail)'" <[email protected]>, "'Harrison Call Jr. (E-mail)'"
<[email protected]>, "'Jack_G_Hochheimer (E-mail)'"
<[email protected]>, "'Janice Zewe (E-mail)'" <[email protected]>,
"'Jesse Ante (E-mail)'" <[email protected]>, "'Joe Langenberg (E-mail)'"
<[email protected]>, "'June Skillman (E-mail)'" <[email protected]>,
"'Katie Kaplan (E-mail)'" <[email protected]>, "'Kelly Lee (E-mail)'"
<[email protected]>, "'Lawrence Tobias (E-mail)'" <[email protected]>, "'Les
Pereira (E-mail)'" <[email protected]>, "'Mariam Mirzadeh (E-mail)'"
<[email protected]>, "'Michael Keller (E-mail)'"
<[email protected]>, "'Michael McCreery (E-mail)'"
<[email protected]>, "'Michael Medock (E-mail)'"
<[email protected]>, "'Michael Yeo (E-mail)'" <[email protected]>,
"'Mike Jaske (E-mail)'" <[email protected]>, "'Morteza Sabet
(E-mail)'" <[email protected]>, "'Randall Hunt (E-mail)'" <[email protected]>,
"'RANDY ERICKSON (E-mail)'" <[email protected]>, "'Rebecca Berdahl (E-mail)'"
<[email protected]>, "'Robert Sparks (E-mail)'" <[email protected]>, "'Robert
Strauss (E-mail)'" <[email protected]>, "'Roland Allred (E-mail)'"
<[email protected]>, "'Roland Schoettle (E-mail)'"
<[email protected]>, "'Ron Calvert (E-mail)'" <[email protected]>, "'Ron
Prater (E-mail)'" <[email protected]>, "'Samuel Kwong (E-mail)'"
<[email protected]>, "'Sarah Majok (E-mail)'"
<[email protected]>, "'Scott O'donnell (E-mail)'"
<[email protected]>, "'Shishir Mukherjee (E-mail)'"
<[email protected]>, "'ShyShenq Liou (E-mail)'"
<[email protected]>, "'Stan Gray (E-mail)'" <[email protected]>, "'Steve
Mavis (E-mail)'" <[email protected]>, "'Susan Schneider (E-mail)'"
<[email protected]>, "'Tim Wu (E-mail)'" <[email protected]>, "'Ty Larson
(E-mail)'" <[email protected]>, "'Wally Chan Ying Sun (E-mail)'"
<[email protected]>
Cc: "Yeung, Manho" <[email protected]>, "Jenkins, Robert" <[email protected]>, "Torres,
Dalisay" <[email protected]>, "Shea, Karen M" <[email protected]>, "Tom, William
(UEPM)" <[email protected]>, "Thomson, Chad" <[email protected]>
Subject: PG&E Meeting #3 Minutes - Final
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 11:02:41 -0700
Message-ID:
<51AB542E9FCDD111886F00805FA7402A0650708F@exchange202.comp.pge.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0082_01C0C73E.5C32B260"
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
Stakeholders,
The final stakeholder meeting #3 minutes are attached. These minutes will
also be posted on the Cal-ISO web-site.
Regards,
Chad Thomson
Transmission Planning
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
[email protected]
415.973.2635
<<PGE-Mtg3-Minutes-Final.doc>>
- PGE-Mtg3-Minutes-Final.doc | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
FYI.
PL
---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 01/29/2001
10:19 AM ---------------------------
From: Larry Joe Hunter 01/25/2001 06:05 PM
To: William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M
Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol
McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janie
Aguayo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Derek Bailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Diane
Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Julie Brewer/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Please distribute - booking to ECC
Please distribute to your book administrators:
If you enter deals with the following entities, please use the TAGG shortname
below and Enron entity of ECC:
Counterparty TAGG shortname
AEC Oil & Gas (any AEC name) AEC-OIL&GAS
Alberta Energy Co. AEC-OIL&GAS
Agrium AGRIUM
Dynegy Canada DYNEGYCAN
Engage Canada ENGAGEENECAN
TransCanada TRANSCANENEFIN
Duke Energy Mkt (Canadian point) DUKEENEMARLTD
Thanks for the help.
Joe Hunter | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 11/06/2000
11:07 AM ---------------------------
"John D. Martin" <[email protected]> on 11/05/2000 05:55:41 PM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Hello Vince
Vince,
A couple of things. First, I'm planning on your arrival at Baylor sometime
the afternoon of Monday, November 13. I want to set up a small seminar for
our faculty if you want to do it. I will schedule it for 4 pm so if you
can arrive in Waco (Continental has several flights in each day) sometime
in early afternoon I'll pick you up. The Ex MBA class begins at 6 p.m. and
I'll set you up to speak first for about an hour with q&a to follow. How
about putting together some thoughts related to our paper? You can do the
same talk for the faculty in the early afternoon. You and I can get then
together on Tuesday morning to work on the paper. I have a 1 p.m. class on
Tuesday is my only constraint. If you have time to hang around we'll do
the talk a third time in that class. By then I suspect we will have made
some real progress.
Next point, we have both Ken Lay and Jeff Skilling set up for Dec 4th in
the afternoon. I plan to get some questions together for them based on our
discussions next Monday and Tuesday.
I'm really looking forward to seeing you next week and to working on our
paper.
Have a great week. I'm off to Austin and New Orleans this week, thus the
reason for the early message on the class a week from tomorrow.
Take care.
John
p.s. Take a look at my web site for a review of the spring "new economy and
business education conference". By the by, I need a short bio-sketch on
you for the site and for my introduction to the faculty and the class.
John D. Martin
Carr P. Collins Chair in Finance
Finance Department
Baylor University
PO Box 98004
Waco, TX 76798
254-710-4473 (Office)
254-710-1092 (Fax)
[email protected]
web: http://hsb.baylor.edu/html/martinj/home.html | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I will be out of the office from Wednesday thru Friday, Oct 24-26. If you need immediate assistance, please contact Brian Schwertner at ext. 3-7576. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Sean may want to go to this.
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 10/26/2000 12:49
PM ---------------------------
Angie Zeman@ENRON
10/26/2000 12:26 PM
To: Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Mid-Atlantic Winter Operations Meeting
Does someone need to go to this? -AZ
---------------------- Forwarded by Angie Zeman/Corp/Enron on 10/26/2000
12:18 PM ---------------------------
[email protected] on 10/26/2000 08:40:11 AM
To: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
cc: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
Subject: Mid-Atlantic Winter Operations Meeting
On behalf of Cynthia Ellis, I would like to invite you to attend the annual
Dominion Transmission Mid-Atlantic Winter Operations Meeting to be held at The
Jefferson Hotel in Richmond, VA on November 14, 2000. We have scheduled the
meeting to begin at 10:00 am and last until around 3:00 pm. Lunch will be
provided for you. In order to appropriately plan for food and beverage
needs,
please let me know by November 7, 2000 if you plan to attend. I will also
need
to know if you will require a room reservation for the evening of November 13.
You may respond via e-mail or call me at (304)627-3916. We look forward to
seeing you there! | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
please add Stephanie McGinnis to the email.
it should be
John Powell
Debbie Brackett
Stephanie McGinnis | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Lucie,
Yes, I have received the package.
Vince
"Lucie Deathridge" <[email protected]> on 05/24/2000 05:31:09 PM
Please respond to "Lucie Deathridge" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Australian Energy Risk 2000
Thank you for agreeing to speak at the Australian Energy Risk 2000
conference in Sydney in July. Last week I sent a speaker pack to you. I
would be grateful if you would confirm receipt of this by return of email.
In the event that you have not received it please let me know IMMEDIATELY
and send me your full contact details. I am the co-ordinator of this
conference and please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any queries.
Regards
Lucie Deathridge
Conference Co-ordinator
Risk Publications
?
Tel: (+44) (0207) 484 9867 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Crude 24X7 WTI Marketing Effort
Trade Count:
195 Trades
9.4 Million Barrels
7 Counterparties Transacting Today
27 Counterparties Transacting to Date | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Please work your appropriate magic on this deal so I can pay them. They sent
their first invoice to CES
Producer Pipe Status
CNG Field Services Carnegie Invoice received 3/10 for 13113 MMBtu. Deal
216175 set up, not sure of point. Pricing as per John Singer
(Delivery at CPA @ Jefferson)
Thanks WRP | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Nipple Nibbler
DG
"Brent Wallace" <[email protected]> on 04/11/2001 02:52:49 PM
To: "James Conlee \(E-mail\)" <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
cc: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: Prison Bitch Name Generator
What's yo name, biznitch?
http://members.iglou.com/lyons/bitchGen.html
<<Oz Prison Bitch Name Generator.url>>
- Oz Prison Bitch Name Generator.url | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
FYI - sorry I forgot to send this to you guys last week - Alex I do not have Elizabeth Soto's home number - if you do, please invite her as well. Hope to see you guys there.
PL
-----Original Message-----
From: Love, Phillip M.
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 3:23 PM
To: Keiser, Kam; Winfree, O'Neal D.; Palmer, B. Scott; Valdes, John; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; McLaughlin Jr., Errol
Subject: FW: Bankruptcy Party at PLove's tonight
With a little more notice, hopefully we will not cancel the gig. The party is back on for Saturday Dec. 15th - party start time is now 4 p.m. Please pass on to your groups again.
PL
-----Original Message-----
From: Love, Phillip M.
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 2:54 PM
To: Keiser, Kam; Palmer, B. Scott; Winfree, O'Neal D.; Valdes, John; McLaughlin Jr., Errol; Gossett, Jeffrey C.
Subject: Bankruptcy Party at PLove's tonight
Send to your group's please.
If you feel like drowning your sorrows at the end of the world in some free keg beer, sodas and hard liquor - come down to Clear Lake and celebrate the fact that today may be the last paycheck you receive from Enron. Playstation, pool, and darts(with pictures of great Enron leaders) will be available for your enjoyment. You can also try chase the 3 year old with the dirty diaper. Party starts about 7 ish. We will order Pizza or something like that if you haven't eaten. Directions:
I - 45 South to exit 29 - CLC Blvd.
Turn left under the freeway - heading east
You will travel roughly four miles (through 3 lights and two stop signs) turn left on Noble Pine(across from Children's World)
When that street dead end's take a right on Towering Oak
Take first left onto Cherry Oak
That dead end's at Sterling Wood Way - take a left.
Third house of the right 4435 Sterling Wood Way
281-486-7026
Hope to see everyone there.
PL | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Sally,
FYI. Some of the slides are helpful.
Josh | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
http://www.consultrci.com
************************************************************************
Read SCIENTECH's SourceBook Weekly article: "Making the Wires Sing: Some
Utilities Take on Challenges, Opportunities of Being Wirecoms," at:
http://www.consultrci.com/web/rciweb.nsf/Web+Pages/SBEntrance.html
************************************************************************
===============================================================
SCIENTECH IssueAlert, October 31, 2000
Enron Offers to Buy Out Azurix
By: Will McNamara, Director, Electric Industry Analysis
===============================================================
Enron Corp. announced that it has offered up to $275 million in funding
to take Azurix Corp. (NYSE: AZX) private at a buy-out price of $7 per share.
Enron owns directly and indirectly about 66 percent of Azurix, a global
water company that owns, operates and manages water and wastewater assets
and provides related services. The specific structure and timing of Enron's
proposal has yet to be determined, but the company's board is now considering
the proposal.
ANALYSIS: Azurix has been plagued with operational and financial problems
over the last 12 months, culminating in the departure of its former CEO
Rebecca Mark in late August. Enron had established Azurix in July 1998
with a $2.4 billion acquisition of Britain's Wessex Water, which provides
water and wastewater services to a U.K. population of approximately 3.5
million. Operating primarily in the United Kingdom and Latin America
(Argentina
and Brazil), Azurix was intended to be Enron's vehicle to capitalize on
what it perceived to be favorable market conditions for water investments.
Yet, Azurix has not been a profitable operation for Enron, and has been
seen as a real anomaly when compared against Enron's consistent success
in its other ventures (for example, EnronOnline). For instance, Azurix
reported year-end 1999 net income of $67 million, significantly under
projections
for what Enron had hoped for the subsidiary. After months of speculation,
Mark stepped down both as Azurix CEO and from the Enron board of directors,
and was replaced by John Garrison, Jr. Mark maintained throughout her tenure
as CEO of Azurix that the company needed time to develop core assets and
capabilities. However, this approach was in stark contrast to Enron's guiding
philosophy*as espoused by COO Jeffrey Skilling*which has moved the company
away from owning hard assets. Skilling also believed that, although acquiring
the Wessex operation gave Azurix the engineering capability and industry
knowledge to participate in the water business, privatization of the water
industry has slowed down considerably since the company began to penetrate
this market. Instead of pursuing a capital-intensive strategy for Azurix,
Skilling wanted Azurix to become more of a service-oriented business. This
change in business direction coincided with the departure of Mark.
Yet, Azurix has continued to flounder even since Mark left. In the third
quarter of this year, Enron reportedly lost $128 million in its "corporate
and other" category and attributed a fourth of the loss to the Azurix
operation.
Azurix's stock price started a marked decline in early August when it was
announced that annual results would not meet analysts' expectations. While
Azurix was taken public in June 1999 at a price of $19 per share, it currently
is priced at $6 1/4 (at close of the markets on Oct. 30). This is an
approximately
$3 increase from what Azurix had been trading at recently, presumably due
to Enron's announcement of the proposed buyout.
Enron's buyout offer comes after four unnamed parties approached Enron
about buying its stake in Azurix. Reportedly, three out of the four potential
buyers were unwilling to pay more than $4 per share, although one of the
buyers initially considered an offer of $7 per share, but ultimately decided
against the purchase. Enron's motivation in returning Azurix to a private
status is probably one of protecting its shareholders. Enron pointed out
in its announcement that shareholders would receive, on a timely basis,
a cash payment for their shares that is significantly above the price of
the shares at which Azurix has traded over the last several months.
Making matters worse for Enron, a group of plaintiffs, represented by New
York law firm Wechsler Harwood Halebian & Feffer LLP, have initiated a
class-action lawsuit against Azurix in the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas. The plaintiffs seek to recover damages
on behalf of all investors who purchased Azurix stock during the period
of June 9, 1999 (the date of Azurix's IPO) and Aug. 8, 2000, and who "suffered
damages as a result." The law firm is claiming that Azurix violated the
Federal securities laws. I placed a call to the law firm this morning in
hopes of getting additional information about what the class-action suit
entails. Unfortunately, I did not receive a call back before press time.
The consensus among the vast majority of U.S. energy companies is that
the profitability of water as a convergence strategy is questionable. The
most obvious negative about the water business is that it most likely will
remain a heavily regulated delivery business, offering few opportunities
for private companies to penetrate the market. Water is a very staid business
that seems inconsistent with Enron's aggressive growth strategy. After
Enron secures a fair return for Azurix's shareholders, it is not clear
what the company will do with its water subsidiary, but I would not be
surprised if Azurix is sold to another company. However, in August*right
before Mark's departure*Azurix announced that it had begun a pilot program
in the Lower Rio Grande using its Internet exchange Water2Water.com. The
site will provide users with information, price transparency and efficiency
in water exchanges. This announcement indicated that Azurix would begin
trading water rights, adding this commodity to the growing list of Enron's
traded commodities (energy, telecom, weather derivatives, etc.). So it
may be the case that Enron keeps Azurix, but turns it into a water trading
operation as opposed to water and wastewater services. In any case, the
present objective for Enron will be financing the buyout and ensuring that
Azurix's shareholders receive a significant premium to the market price
of Azurix. Enron also wants to ensure other benefits to Azurix, including
a significant near-term reduction in Azurix's general and administrative
expenses, greater certainty to Azurix's customers and employees and increased
flexibility for restructuring Azurix's assets and business.
===============================================================
Need to design and implement your IT infrastructure? Learn more about
SCIENTECH's
Information Technology team and what they can do for you at:
http://www.consultrci.com/web/rciweb.nsf/web/Depts-IT.html
===============================================================
SCIENTECH is pleased to provide you with your free, daily IssueAlert. Let
us know if we can help you with in-depth analyses or any other SCIENTECH
information products. If you would like to refer a colleague to receive
our free, daily IssueAlerts, please reply to this email and include their
full name and email address or register directly at:
http://www.consultrci.com/web/infostore.nsf/Products/IssueAlert
Sincerely,
Will McNamara
Director, Electric Industry Analysis
[email protected]
===============================================================
Feedback regarding SCIENTECH's IssueAlert should be sent to
[email protected]
===============================================================
SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are compiled based on independent analysis by
SCIENTECH
consultants. The opinions expressed in SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are not
intended to predict financial performance of companies discussed or to
be the basis for investment decisions of any kind. SCIENTECH's sole purpose
in publishing its IssueAlerts is to offer an independent perspective regarding
the key events occurring in the energy industry, based on its long-standing
reputation as an expert on energy and telecommunications issues.
Copyright 2000. SCIENTECH, Inc.
If you do not wish to receive any further IssueAlerts from SCIENTECH, please
reply to this message and in the body of the email type "remove." | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
John:
?
Thanks again for the opportunity to provide my technical service.? Attached
is an agreement that covers our arrangement.? Let me know if you have any
questions.? If it's ok, please sign and fax back to me at (410)308-0441.? I
look forward to working with you.?
?
Mark Sagel
Psytech Analytics
(410)308-0245
- Agree-Enron.doc | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Attached please find the power credit watchlist dated 04/9/01. Please
direct any comments/questions to the credit hotline, (713) 853-1803
Please note that the following changes have been made to the watchlist:
Alliant Energy Coporate Services, Inc. - Physical Call for Approval - 6
Months
Ameren Services Company - Physical & Finanical NO TRADES
California Power Exchange Corporation - Physical & Financial NO TRADES
Pacific Gas & Electric Company - Physical & Financial NO TRADES
Veronica Gonzalez | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Check out eBiz for the scoop on Enron's involvement in U.S. Election 2000.
Get the answers to your questions about the Enron PAC and Enron's corporate
political contributions!
Also in the current issue of eBiz:
Enron teams up with the largest energy consumer on the face of the planet
What's happening in the PGE/Sierra-Pacific sale
See where Houston ranked in a national construction survey
What Enron has to do with blues music
It's all in the latest eBiz. Go to home.enron.com, click Publications, then
click eBiz, and "eBiz August 11, 2000." | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
W E E K E N D S Y S T E M S A V A I L A B I L I T Y
F O R
April 27, 2001 5:00pm through April 30, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:
ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.
AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.
EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.
EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.
ENRON CENTER SOUTH DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages
ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS: No Scheduled Outages.
FIELD SERVICES: No Scheduled Outages.
INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages.
MESSAGING: No Scheduled Outages.
MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.
NT: No Scheduled Outages.
OS/2: No Scheduled Outages.
OTHER SYSTEMS:
Impact: EBS
Time: Fri 4/27/2001 at 8:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 4/27/2001 at 9:00:00 PM CT
Fri 4/27/2001 at 6:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 4/27/2001 at 7:00:00 PM PT
Sat 4/28/2001 at 2:00:00 AM London thru Sat 4/28/2001 at 3:00:00 AM
Outage: OSSPROD Server Move - Portland to Houston (EBS)
Environments Impacted: All
Purpose: ECOMS is the EBS order management system. It is a mission ciritical
app, and the server is being moved to Houston.
Oracle does not function in a NAT environment, so network changes must be
made to accomodate the move.
Backout: Put original ACL back in place
Contact(s): Dennis McGough 713-345-3143
SITARA: No Scheduled Outages.
SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.
TELEPHONY: No Scheduled Outages
TERMINAL SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.
UNIFY:
Impact: CORP
Time: Fri 4/27/2001 at 8:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 4/28/2001 at 12:00:00 AM CT
Fri 4/27/2001 at 6:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 4/27/2001 at 10:00:00 PM PT
Sat 4/28/2001 at 2:00:00 AM London thru Sat 4/28/2001 at 6:00:00 AM London
Outage: Unify Server Name Changes
Environments Impacted: Unify Development
Purpose: Full complinace with naming standard.
Backout: A full backup of the servers and Emergency Repair disk will be done
prior to the name change.
Contact(s): Charles Ballmer 713-853-0684
Darryl Vinson 713-345-8726
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------
FOR ASSISTANCE
(713) 853-1411 Enron Resolution Center
Specific Help:
Information Risk Management (713) 853-5536
SAP/ISC
(713) 345-4727
Unify On-Call (713) 284-3757 [Pager]
Sitara On-Call (713) 288-0101 [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS (713) 639-9726 [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP (713) 285-3165 [Pager]
CPR (713) 284-4175 [Pager]
EDI Support (713) 327-3893 [Pager]
EES Help Desk (713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Thanks. I like this format...please keep me updated. Jeff
Robert Johnston
10/26/2000 05:16 PM
To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: US Election
We are tracking the poll numbers and trends heading into the election. Still
too close to call, but momentum may be swinging back to Gore.
The major tracking polls: Bush Leading in 4, Gore in 1.
ABC CNN MSNBC Voter W.Post
Bush 48 49 43 44 47
Gore 46 42 45 40 45
Note that Bush is leading in West Virginia and Louisiana, what should be Gore
states, but Gore is leading in Florida and Ohio, two "must-win" Bush states.
Gore is trending favorably in large vote-rich states including not only
Florida and Ohio, but also New Jersey and Pennsylvania as well as traditional
Democratic strongholds such as Minnesota and Wisconsin. One caveat is that
today's NYT Florida poll is the flip of yesterday's Florida Sun Sentinel
Florida poll that showed Bush leading (46-41). Bush has changed his schedule
and is on his way to Ohio tonight.
Latest State Polls: "Bad News" for Both
??? ??? AZ CO FL* LA* MI NJ
Bush 49 44 42 45 42 41
Gore 39 40 46 34 44 47
Nader 3 3 3 4 3 4
Buchanan 0 1 1 3 -- 1
OH* OK PA WA WV* WI
Bush 43 51 33 37 46 39
Gore 45 40 44 46 36 46
Nader 1 -- 1 3 -- 5
Buchanan -- 2 0 -- -- -- | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I just heard from Scott, and this second VPP has just closed. Please write
up the physical deal tics regarding this add-on piece. Remember, you will
not be receiving these second VPP vols physically until March. When you get
a chance, please send me the deal tic - EB 3339F. I will make sure people in
my area receive a copy. When we receive the executed docs, I will make you a
copy.
joan | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
fyi
-----Original Message-----
From: Wheeler, Terrie
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 11:17 AM
To: Joyce, Mary
Subject: FW: Diomedes
Mary - We've completed out analysis and attached are 2 spreadsheets with a summary page for your review.
(1) DC XMS Recap File
Contains an analysis of his expense reports showing the following:
Personal Due Company in US $ $ 23,975
Missing Receipts in US $ $ 70,070
Missing Airline Ticket Receipts in US $ $ 99,177
Personal Meals in US $ $ 2,097
Total to Collect from Diomedes $195,319
(2) DC Expense Overlap File
This file contains an analysis of overlapping travel & hotels, or hotels with not air travel, and vice versa. Note that the summary shows you a min & max recovery amount of $11,288 and $18,474. These amounts are where the hotel stay doesn't track with the air travel dates. I understand that quite often a ticket may be used for dates other than what's printed on the ticket receipt. So this may account for the discrepancies her. Also, note that one of the amounts did not have a receipt and hence are already included in the "Missing Airline Ticket Receipts" category above.
(3) 4 US and 1 Brazil expense reports have been sent to Orlando for his review. As I mentioned in my voice mail, he seems reluctant to sign anything and referred us to Joe. However, GG Garcia has drafted Orlando a memo and again is requesting his review.
(4) Payment for London flat s/be rec'd next Tuesday. Monday is a banking holiday for them.
See updated notes below in red.
Terrie
-----Original Message-----
From: Wheeler, Terrie
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 4:47 PM
To: Joyce, Mary
Subject: Diomedes
Quick update from this week:
Joe reviewed & approved all but 5 expense reports this week. Last 5 to be review & approved by Orlando since we just located them (4 are U.S. reports). See latest comment (3) above.
Still attempting to resolve returned tickets ($150k) with Brazil travel agency. Actually returned? If so, who got the credit? Estimate $150k in question. Travel agency accountant will back in their office Monday to discuss. Credits could not be located. Included in Missing Airline Ticket Receipts in our analysis in comment (1) above.
Confirming Diomedes' Finland travel with Mark Metts. Not business per Corp Dev. Included in Personal Exps in our analysis in comment (1) above.
Banking instructions eMailed to Diomedes so he can pay ENE for London Property. Payment s/be forthcoming. See separate eMail from London today that I forwarded to you. Monies s/be rec'd next Tuesday.
Audit completed duplicate and overlapping travel review. 5 items in question totaling $11k - $25k depending on stance we want to take. See comment (2) above.
Hope to have this wrapped up next week. Will provide summary to you then. Have a great weekend!
Terrie | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Notice Phy & Fin Index tabs have been added... | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Please plan to attend a meeting to discuss netting issues on Thursday,
December 7, 2:00-2:30 pm in EB38C1.
Please contact Tana Jones at X33399 if you have a conflict.
Best regards,
Taffy Milligan | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Stacy!
This transaction is a one year deal with one of our Appalachian producers (C E Richner) done by John Singer. The previous deals were done under contract # 96029815 ( assigned over from Columbia Energy Services), we would like this new deal and all subsequent deals to be done under the Enfolio Gas Purchase Agreement (the one you emailed to me on 10/9).
Kindly provide Richard Deming with the appropriate documentation.
Thanks
Rudwell
53596 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Here is the Seetin e-mail. This is actually complaining about the "Fair
Plan' which came out last week. I have a call into Bob Levin at NYMEX.
Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 06/07/2001 01:28 PM -----
Gary Ackerman <[email protected]>
06/07/2001 01:07 PM
Please respond to foothillservices
To: Sue Mara <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: [Fwd: "Newest" Edison Bailout Plan Has A Familiar Sound]
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from hitchcock.mail.mindspring.net ([207.69.200.23]) by
osgood.mail.mindspring.net (Earthlink Mail Service) with ESMTP id
thva29.agc.37kbi1v for <[email protected]>; Thu, 7 Jun 2001
12:14:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from augustus (augustus-z.mspring.net [207.69.231.21]) by
hitchcock.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA11760 for
<[email protected]>; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 12:14:01 -0400 (EDT)
X-MindSpring-Loop: [email protected]
Received: from unidial.com ([206.112.0.9]) by augustus (Earthlink Mail
Service) with ESMTP id thva28.l08.37kbpol for <[email protected]>; Thu, 7
Jun 2001 12:14:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from markseetin (cd-188-85.ra30.dc.capu.net [64.50.188.85]) by
unidial.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA12926; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 11:42:52
-0400 (EDT)
From: "Mark Seetin" <[email protected]>
To: "Andrew Skaff" <[email protected]>, "Assemblyman David
Kelley" <[email protected]>, "Brad Williams"
<[email protected]>, "Caroline Katzin"
<[email protected]>, "Casey Beyer"
<[email protected]>, "Chuck Cole" <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, "Dan Skopec" <[email protected]>,
"Dan Walters" <[email protected]>, "David Lazarus"
<[email protected]>, "DAVID WARD" <[email protected]>,
"Dorothy Rothrock" <[email protected]>, "doug John"
<[email protected]>, "Evan L. Goldberg"
<[email protected]>, "Gary Ackerman"
<[email protected]>, "Gordon Rutledge" <[email protected]>,
"Gregg Ward" <[email protected]>, "J. A. Savage"
<[email protected]>, "Jack M. Stewart" <[email protected]>,
"Joe Paul" <[email protected]>, "Keely Martin Bosler"
<[email protected]>, "Linda L. Robertson"
<[email protected]>, "Michael Kahl" <[email protected]>,
"Randy Poole" <[email protected]>, "Richard Costigan III"
<[email protected]>, "Roderick D. Wright"
<[email protected]>, "Scott Govenar"
<[email protected]>, "Tara L. Ord" <[email protected]>,
"Terrie Williams" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Charlie DeWitt" <[email protected]>, "Robert Levin"
<[email protected]>, "Neal Wolkoff" <[email protected]>
Subject: "Newest" Edison Bailout Plan Has A Familiar Sound
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 11:42:39 -0400
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000F_01C0EF46.F48CEF00"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
?
?
To:? Direct Access Coalition Members
From:? Mark Seetin, New York Mercantile Exchange
SUBJECT:? Hertzberg/ Edison &new8 proposal is &de ja vu all over again!8
?
?????? When it comes to having nerve, SoCal Edison takes second to no one.?
The latest rescue proposal announced by Speaker Hertzberg has a familiar ring
to it*--- like the dinner bell at the shark tank at Sea World.?
?
The Hertzberg memo and a Dow Jones story are included in this memo.? A
summary of the primary terms of Hertzberg/Edison,s plan is as follows:
?
o???????? &Large8 users of electricity (500 kw and up) would have direct
access after two years.
o???????? Residential and small businesses would be &re-regulated8
o???????? The &ransom8 for direct access is that businesses would be required
to retire Edison,s $3.1 billion or so in debt*and that the obligation would
&follow8 them to the land of direct access
?
Does anything sound familiar here (hint*think AB 1890 without the surplus
budget and electricity of 1995)??? Remember the 1995 CPUC action and 1996 AB
1890?? SCE was a very active and influential player in that process.? Here,s
a short review of AB 1890:
?
o???????? Direct access would be allowed (projected to be about 1998) after
the utilities stranded costs were retired.? (Note: At the time of the
bankruptcy of the PX in March 2001, direct access was not just elusive---it
had been banned by the passage of AB ) 1X in January.)
o???????? The state created California Power Exchange was mandatory for the
utilities*though by 1999 they began urgently to use alternatives, they were
refused on at least four occasions by CPUC action, to use sources outside the
PX.
o???????? Stranded costs, determined inside the PX pricing mechanism were
applied to all transactions that occurred outside the PX, thus the obligation
&followed8 those seeking an alternative market to the PX.
o???????? The mandatory PX forced the market into a day-ahead pricing scheme
that effective placed the vast majority of California electricity pricing
into the volatile spot market.
?
If this were not California, one would have to say that this is
&unbelievable,8 but the legislative/regulatory track record since 1995 in
California is consistent, if anything.? Adoption of this plan would not only
mean that Californians did not &get the baby (direct access) after paying the
ransom (the Competition Transition Charge, CTC)8 since 1996----BUT, they,ve
been taken hostage themselves now, and another ransom is due.?
?
California Kafkaesque
??????????? Since the beginning of the deregulatory process in 1994-95,
California has taken a novel approach to its energy markets---Unfortunately,
that novel must have been written by Franz Kafka.
?
?
?
Hertzberg/Edison Plan
A Fair Plan for California
Assembly Democratic Caucus
?
What the California public believes about the energy crisis:
?
Utilities are to blame.
Out-of-state generators have made huge profits.
We need to build more power plants to keep up with demand.
Deregulation is a failure.
The economy of the state is at risk.
?
What the public wants in a solution to the energy crisis:
?
Re-regulation (restore balance to system).
Very small, if any, rate increases.
Reliability of supply (no more blackouts).
No permanent damage to environment, more emphasis on renewable sources.
Penalties for those who gouged the state.
Guarantee this won,t happen again.
?
Themes of the Fair Plan:
?
Federal role:? The feds have refused to obey the law to maintain fair &
reasonable rates.
Restore fairness:? Solutions must protect residential and small business
users.
Re-regulation:? Reassert our authority over California,s energy destiny.
Stability & Reliability:? Increase supply and keep a lid on rates.
?
?
Goals of the Fair Plan:
?
Provide customers with reliable power and stable rates.
Restore regulated utilities to credit-worthiness to enable them to resume
role of energy supplier.
Ensure that mega-users of electricity have direct access to independent
electricity providers to protect California,s economy.
?
?
Many elements of the proposed Edison MOU remain unchanged, except for:
Option to purchase the transmission system.
Re-regulates service for all residential and small business consumers.
Provides direct access to providers for mega-users above 500 kW.
Mega-users pay DRC to cover SCE debt.
?
Added elements to the MOU
Transmission option at book value.
Federal tax refund must be applied to debt.
SCE purchases net short only for residences and small businesses, if
necessary.
PUC retains jurisdiction over rates.
EIX provides assurance to keep SCE creditworthy.
?
?
Residential & Small Protection Plan
Protects 99.9% of all customers (those who never peak above 500 kilowatts)
who utilize 81.5 % of load???????????
Will be served by SCE through native generation, bilateral contracts
(including QFs) and Sunrise
Present average PUC bundled rate = 15.7 cents per KW hour
Under Fair Plan, average rate would be 14 cents per KW hour including AB1X
payments
?
Mega-Users Direct Access Plan
Mega-users peak demand 500 KW or more represent 3,600 SCE customers and 18.5%
of total load
Mega-users would gain direct access to the wholesale market
?
Mega-Users Direct Access Plan (continued)
Current average PUC rate = 12.98 cents/KW hour
Fair Plan average wholesale price in 2003 = 12 cents per KW hour
Mega-users would pay SCE,s $3.5 billion debt minus $400 million+ dollars tax
refund from EIX
DRC for debt and cost of electricity fits within existing PUC rates
?
Dow Jones Story
LOS ANGELES (Dow Jones)--A plan that would put most of the burden of rescuing
embattled Edison International (EIX) unit Southern California Edison on large
businesses "has possibilities" if it can gain stakeholder approval, said Bob
Foster, Edison's senior vice president of public affairs, during a conference
call Tuesday.
?
The plan would have customers who use more than 500 kilowatt-hours a month of
electricity finance the cost of power the utility must purchase, or have
purchased on its behalf, in the wholesale market. The "non-core" customers
would
also help the utility recoup most of its $5.5 billion in unrecovered power
costs
through a surcharge on their bills.
?
"Core" residential customers would be protected from the wholesale power
market
as the primary beneficiaries of the low-cost power the utility generates
itself
or has secured through long-term contracts.
?
Assembly Speaker Bob Hertzberg, D-Van Nuys, strongly supports the plan, and
has
asked a former Sacramento mayor to help him take the temperature of Edison
stakeholders "to see if the approach has merit or can be acceptable," Foster
said.
?
"Some of the legislative leadership believes this is an attractive option in
both houses," Foster said.
?
Business groups worry that the plan could cost the state billions in lost
economic activity, because it may force companies to relocate to other states.
?
The core/non-core proposal is one of several being discussed by lawmakers as
alternatives to a memorandum of understanding reached between Edison and Gov.
Gray Davis in April. The MOU, which would have the state buy the utility's
transmission lines, has been pronounced dead by many in the legislature,
though
Edison and Davis' administration say they are still devoted to seeing it
through.
?
? | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
To Market Participants and Scheduling Coordinators:
The ISO received today a subpoena from the California Public Utilities
Commission. The subpoena is attached. The subpoena requires response by
April 2. The subpoena includes a description of the confidential treatment
that the CPUC will afford documents produced in response. In accordance
with the protective order in 00-08-002, the ISO will mark as confidential
documents it produces to the CPUC that contain information subject to
20.3.2. Concerns related to the subpoena should be directed directly to the
California Public Utilities Commission. The CPUC contact related to the
subpoena is Barbara Ferguson who can be reached at (415) 703-2682. The ISO
would appreciate being notified also of any concerns. The ISO contacts are
Jeanne Sol, at [email protected] and Norma Formanek at
<mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] both of whom should be copied
on correspondence.
Jeanne M. Sol,
Regulatory Counsel
California ISO
(916) 608-7144
____________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________
The Foregoing e-Mail Communication (Together With Any Attachments Thereto)
Is Intended For The Designated Recipient(s) Only. Its Terms May Be
Confidential And Protected By Attorney/Client Privilege or Other Applicable
Privileges. Unauthorized Use, Dissemination, Distribution, Or Reproduction
Of This Message Is Strictly Prohibited.
- 3-26ISO Subpoena.doc | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
tons of fun. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
>From: Thanksgiving Day <[email protected]>
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: DOZEN ROSES & CHOCOLATES ONLY $29.99! By FedEx!
>Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 20:44:01 EST
>
> THANKSGIVING IS NOVEMBER 22! JUST A FEW DAYS AWAY!
>
>Dear mike:
>
>SEND A DOZEN MAGNIFICENT LONG-STEMMED ROSES TO THE SPECIAL PEOPLE
>IN YOUR LIFE FOR THANKSGIVING FOR AN AMAZINGLY LOW $29.99
>(plus overnight shipping by FedEx - guaranteed!)!
>
>FREE: WORLD FAMOUS GHIRARDELLI CHOCOLATES! With any lovely bouquet
>you send for THANKSGIVING, mike, Proflowers will send the
>special people in your heart or on your mind a lovely heart-shaped
>box of WORLD FAMOUS GHIRARDELLI CHOCOLATES ABSOLUTELY FREE!
>
>THIS IS A VERY SPECIAL DEAL, FOR A VERY SPECIAL HOLIDAY,
>AT A VERY SPECIAL TIME.
>
>What a wonderful way to decorate a special THANKSGIVING TABLE!
>
>Your beautiful flowers, packaged in a lovely presentation box,
>and the delightful complimentary boxes of delicious chocolates
>are GUARANTEED TO BE DELIVERED BY FedEx ON ANY DAY YOU CHOOSE,
>right up thru Wednesday!
>
>Click here now!
>
>http://www.proflowers.com/iexpect/index_mh_newthanksgiving_fch.cfm?REF=FCHMHThiexpect04
>
>THANKSGIVING DAY IS VERY, VERY SPECIAL, mike, AND THIS
>IS TRULY A FABULOUS OFFER FOR iExpect.com members ON THANKSGIVING!
>
>Take two minutes right now - click on this special link and your
>lovely long-stemmed roses are guaranteed to be delivered in time
>for THANKSGIVING. You will be very glad you did!
>
>http://www.proflowers.com/iexpect/index_mh_newthanksgiving_fch.cfm?REF=FCHMHThiexpect04
>
>PLEASE REMEMBER: THE DELICIOUS GHIRARDELLI CHOCOLATES ARE
>ABSOLUTELY FREE! mike: NOTHING says "Happy Thanksgiving,"
>or "Thank You, or "You Are Special," or "I Love You, or just "I Care"
>better than beautiful, fresh, lovely and deliciously fragrant flowers,
>especially gorgeous long-stemmed roses! Click here now!
>Happy Thanksgiving!
>
>http://www.proflowers.com/iexpect/index_mh_newthanksgiving_fch.cfm?REF=FCHMHThiexpect04
>
>Or call toll free: 1-888-373-7437 (1-888-FRESHEST)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
><<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>
>* To remove yourself from this mailing list, point your browser to:
>http://i.pm0.net/remove?iexpect:10
>* Enter your email address ([email protected]) in the field
>provided and click "Unsubscribe". The mailing list ID is "iexpect:10".
>
>OR...
>
>* Reply to this message with the word "remove" in the subject line.
>
>This message was sent to address [email protected]
>X-PMG-Recipient: [email protected]
><<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>
>
>
>
>
>
>pmguid:u9.vol.2ncgf
>
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
If you could send me the Annex, Paragraph 13 and the pro forma schedule.
Since we do not yet know what shape the actual entity that we will be
contracting will take (it is unlikely that we will contract directly with the
munis but instead through some corporate entity), I think we do not need the
special municipal provisions right now, although, if its not a bunch of work,
maybe we should get the form with and without, so I have a draft of both,
depending on which one we need.
How's the new pad? Is the garden spectacular yet? No hiccups in the
closings or moves, I hope.
From: Tana Jones on 06/20/2000 03:47 PM CDT
To: Greg Johnston/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Canadian Precedent Form of ISDA
Do you only want the form of Credit Support Annex and Paragraph 13 thereto,
or do you also want a pro forma Canadian ISDA Schedule. Also, I would expect
that since you are dealing with Canadian municipalities you would want a form
that include the special municipal provisions, which are somewhat lengthy?
Greg Johnston
06/20/2000 02:41 PM
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric LeDain/CAL/ECT@ECT, Paul
Devries/TOR/ECT@ECT, Chris Gaffney/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Canadian Precedent Form of ISDA
Tana, Enron Canada is currently negotiating a transaction with 6 major
municipalities in Ontario (the "G6") to provide various services to a company
those 6 entities are setting up, which services will include physical and
financial trading (both gas and electricity). John Suttle is working with
Jan Wilson of our Toronto office to set the credit terms applicable to this
entity on both the physical and financial trading side, but they have not yet
made a final determination. In the interim, the G6 has requested that we
send them a copy of our precedent form of master financial trading agreement
(both the ISDA and our short form financial GTC). I assume you get requests
like this all the time and was hoping that you could e-mail to me (i) the
ISDA, credit support annex, Paragraph 13, etc. that we would typically put in
place between ECC and a Canadian counterparty to financially trade gas and
electricity in Canada (ie. incorporating the Canadian provisions), leaving
the credit terms blank for the time being and (ii) the financial GTC we use
for Canadian counterparties.
Call me if you have any questions or if there are any problems with preparing
and forwarding these documents to the counterparty.
Thanks
Greg | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Attached is a three page legislative summary of the Commodity Futures
Modernization Act compiled by Chairman Ewing's office.
<<CEA Summary 12-14.doc>>
Stacy Carey
Director North American Regulatory Policy
International Swaps and Derivatives Association
(202) 457-6545 ph
(703) 256-1833 fax
(917) 543-9622 cell
[email protected]
- CEA Summary 12-14.doc | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Attached please find an updated EPMI Power Credit Watch List as of 12/13/00.
Please direct any questions and/or comments to the Credit Hotline
(713-853-1803).
Regards,
Tracy | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
---------------------- Forwarded by Don Miller/HOU/ECT on 09/20/2000 08:20 AM
---------------------------
"Dalrymple, Kristin" <[email protected]> on 09/19/2000 04:55:13 PM
To: "Don Miller (Enron) (E-mail)" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Document request
Don -
Please send us a copy of New Albany Doc. 02.01.05. We believe this is
probably a very short document. Would it be possible to fax it to us at
281-297-5407?
Thanks,
Kristin Dalrymple
Commercial Associate
Entergy Power Group
281-297-5382 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Here it is!
916-441-6222 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Would you guys please take a look at this and let me know if I can approve it
in the system?
Thanks
----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 10/26/2000 01:06 PM -----
Melba Lozano
10/26/2000 11:53 AM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen H
Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rudi Zipter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bjorn
Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey W White/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Robert B Cass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: US Power Phy Index APPROVAL REQUEST!
Your review and approval of the following product type in the EOL Datamanager
is needed (for directions on approval , please see steps for approval at the
bottom of this e-mail).
Trader : Fletcher Sturm
Example:
US Pwr Phy Index MWD Ent Peak Oct00 USD/MWh
A US Power Transaction with Enron Power Marketing, Inc., under which the
Seller shall sell and the Buyer shall purchase a quantity for firm energy
equal to the Hourly Quantity at the Contract Price. The Contract Price shall
be the Floating Price, as adjusted by the price submitted by the Counterparty
via the website. The period of time during which the Floating Price is
derived (a "Determination Period") shall be a calendar month during the term
of the Transaction; provided that, if the term of the Transaction is less
than one month, such Determination Period shall be the term of the
Transaction.
The transaction is for the applicable hours as set forth herein on each
Delivery Day for the Effective Date 01 Oct 2000 to the Termination Date 31
Oct 2000.
The transaction is for delivery or receipt of energy to any available point
Into Entergy System Border at Seller's daily election.
The Floating Price during a Determination Period shall be the average of the
daily prices listed in the Index for power delivered during Peak hours on
each Delivery Day during the applicable Determination Period. The Floating
Price for each Determination Period shall be calculated utilizing the daily
prices published in Megawatt Daily's Market Report under the headings "Ranges
and Indexes of Trades for Standard 16-Hour Daily Products;Wtd. Av. Index;
Peak Hours, 0600 to 2200; Entergy, into" (the "Index").
The price is quoted in US Dollars per unit of volume, which will be the
Contractual Currency.
The unit of measure against which the price is quoted shall be megawatt-hours
(MWh) and the quantity shown shall be in MW's delivered in each applicable
hour for the duration of the Transaction (the "Hourly Quantity').
The transaction is for on-peak ("Peak") hours on each Delivery Day beginning
with the hour ending 0700 (6:00 am) and concluding with the hour ending 2200
(10:00 pm) Central Prevailing Time. "Delivery Day" means a day during the
term of the transaction that is a Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, or
Friday, excluding any day that is a NERC holiday.
==============================================================================
=====
STEPS FOR APPROVAL:
click the START button
select PROGRAMS
select TEST APPLICATIONS
select ENRONONLINE CLUSTER(PROD)
PROCEED WITH USUAL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click the Enron Online Production Cluster "START" button
select EnronOnLine (this is the EOL Datamanager)
PROCEED WITH EOL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click on the "+" for EnronOnLine
click on the "+" for Product Types
click on the "+" for "Awaiting Approval" (OR "Partially Approved")
select the product requiring review as stated in e-mail above
Right "mouse" click on "properties" to view product set-up
TO APPROVE: Right mouse click on "Approved"
Thanks - Rob Cass - Melba Lozano
x35491 x58986 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
----- Forwarded by Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT on 02/15/2001 04:31 PM -----
"Thompson, Peter J." <[email protected]>
02/15/2001 12:58 PM
To: "Sheila Tweed (E-mail)" <[email protected]>
cc: "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <[email protected]>
Subject: GE Form Agreement
Pursuant to your request, attached please find a draft of the
most recent version of the GE Form Agreement (the third document below),
as well as a blackline (second document below) showing changes made from
the Coyote Springs Agreement that was used a the basis for the
Agreement. In addition, please find the exhibits to the Form Agreement
(fourth document below), as well as a blackline showing changes to the
Coyote Springs Exhibits (first document below). These drafts do not
contain all of my revisions. I will be providing completed drafts by
end of business.
<<CRO- Exhibits to Enron Form Turbine Agreement.DOC>> <<CRO- GE
Agreement Versions 1 to 2.DOC>> <<GE Agreement.DOC>> <<Exhibits to
Enron Turbine Form Agreement.DOC>>
- CRO- Exhibits to Enron Form Turbine Agreement.DOC
- CRO- GE Agreement Versions 1 to 2.DOC
- GE Agreement.DOC
- Exhibits to Enron Turbine Form Agreement.DOC | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Mary- Ken has been asked by Mayor Brown to chair the fundraising effort to
get voter approval on a light rail referendum in Houston. My guess is that
he will decline given the other demands on his schedule, but I don't know
that for sure. I think our respnse
Mary Clark@ENRON
04/13/99 02:21 PM
To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Joe Allen/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Trains - Light rail
Steve/Joe:
Mark suggested that I contact you to provide a response to this employee's
question (see below) to Ken and Jeff about trains and light rail. Please
draft a response and send it to me. I will format it and send it to Ken and
Jeff for their review. Thanks.
Mary Clark
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Clark/Corp/Enron on 04/13/99 02:13
PM ---------------------------
Office Chairman
04/12/99 02:55 PM
To: Mary Clark/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sherri Reinartz/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Trains - Light rail
A question to the Office of the Chairman.
Rosie
---------------------- Forwarded by Office Chairman/Corp/Enron on 04/12/99
02:53 PM ---------------------------
Office of the Chairman@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
04/12/99 07:25 AM
To: Office Chairman@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject:
Office of the Chairman:
While traveling within Germany recently, I noticed that electric powered
trains are popular and also provide a safe, reliable, affordable and
comfortable means of transportation to the public.
This brought to mind a question to ask you:
Is Enron taking any action to promote development and implementation of
electric trains or light rail in the USA and/or abroad, either through the
Political Action Committee, Lobbying or through the efforts of the Business
Development Offices?
I do believe that the commuters would benefit from having access to electric
trains that provide safe, clean and comfortable transport. Enron could
potentially benefit by supplying the power for these trains within the USA
(and abroad as well).
Just think if the city of Houston offered light rail as an option for
commuting to and from work, as well as commuting to other locations - both
interstate and intrastate. A person could take a train to Galveston, Austin,
or elsewhere and arrive in short time with the high speed rail available.
With the new Ballpark downtown and the revitalization of the downtown area,
it would seem that a legitimate method of public transportation is the
element that is missing from the Houston city model. Buses that run on diesel
are clearly not the solution for mass transit.
Regards,
Dave Hubbard
Cuiaba, Brasil
011-55-65-612-2102 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Next Tuesday, December 19th, the 50th floor will be open to all employees for
the Annual Holiday Open House from 3:00pm until 5:00pm. Similar to last
year, we will provide food, beverage and musical entertainment and will also
decorate eight executive offices to reflect the Festival of Lights. Our goal
is to expose our employees to different celebrations around the world and
simultaneously demystify the 50th floor.
For your reference, the offices that will be decorated are listed below:
St. Lucia - Ken Lay
Kwaanza - Jeff Skilling
Los Posadas - Rob Walls
Chinese New Year - Cindy Olson
Hanukkah - Andy Fastow
Ramadan - Rick Buy
Devali - Rick Causey
Christmas - Jim Derrick
We would welcome Executive Committee members to volunteer to greet employees
in the 50th floor elevator lobby or serve punch. Time slots are available
in 15-minute increments from 3:00pm to 5:00pm. Please reply to this e-mail
if you would like to volunteer for this event and I will provide additional
information for your reference at that time.
This annual affair is an employee favorite and you may contact me with any
comments or questions.
Charla Reese
Manager, Community Relations
x35202 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Talked to Les. give a call and i can fill you in.
Best,
Jeff | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Given the negativity toward Enron at the CPUC, should we not file comments if these express our position?
-----Original Message-----
From: Mara, Susan
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 9:47 AM
To: Williams, Robert C.
Cc: Kean, Steven; Dasovich, Jeff; Steffes, James; Kingerski, Harry; Sharp, Vicki; Curry, Wanda; Kaufman, Paul
Subject: AReM/WPTF Comments on Draft Decisions Regarding PX Credit and Direct Access
Dan Douglass has drafted joint comments for two coalitions in which Enron is a member -- Alliance for Retail Energy Markets and Western Power Trading Forum. Robert, feel free to contact Dan directly with your comments. Let me know your thoughts as well. I am out of the office at a WPTF meeting. Dan is here as well. If you need to contact me, you can leave me a message on my office phone or try my cell (415 -- 902-4108), but I'm not sure the cell is working all the time.
Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 06/22/2001 07:35 AM -----
"Dan Douglass" <[email protected]> 06/20/2001 10:59 PM To: "ARM" <[email protected]> cc: Subject: Comments on Draft Decisions Regarding PX Credit and Direct Access
Attached for your review and comment is my first draft of comments to be filed on Monday with regard to the draft decisions of ALJ Barnett and Commissioner Bilas. Please review it carefully, as I have thrown in everything I can think of on a rush basis, and it may require some significant editing. Pay particular attention to Section V dealing with Bilas' request for parties to discuss alternatives to DA suspension. The draft offers a compromise to the DWR's concerns, as expressed in the Angelides memo. Also, notice that Section VI urges the Commission to bifurcate the DA and PX credit issues, acting quickly on the first, if it must, but more leisurely on the PX credit subject.
Finally, I have a suggestion in the form of a question. How would AReM members feel about making this a joint filing with WPTF? There is cross-membership between the two groups and the same issues would be raised in the separate filings which I am otherwise prepared to draft. This draft would requires some modifications so as to refer to the "Joint Parties" as opposed to solely mentioning AReM, and I might add a section dealing more explicitly with WPTF's contribution to getting the zero minimum bill stipulation signed in the first place. Otherwise, the document would stay much as it is (subject to your input over the next few days, of course). Please let me know what you think asap, as I am already working on a WPTF draft. Incidentally, I will also be filing comments on behalf of ABAG which will support the positions taken in the attached document, but I am not proposing that ABAG also be a party to this filing. Thanks for your help! Comments as soon as possible would be very much appreciated!
Dan
Law Offices of Daniel W. Douglass
5959 Topanga Canyon Blvd. Suite 244
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Tel: (818) 596-2201
Fax: (818) 346-6502
[email protected] << File: file://C:\Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\Stationery">
<STYLE>BODY {
MARGIN-TOP: 25px; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 25px; COLOR: #000000; FONT-FAMILY: Arial, Helvetica
}
P.msoNormal {
MARGIN-TOP: 0px; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0px; COLOR: #ffffcc; FONT-FAMILY: Helvetica, mailto:[email protected] >>
- Blank Bkgrd.gif << File: Blank Bkgrd.gif >>
- 6-25-01 AReM Comments - Draft 1.doc << File: 6-25-01 AReM Comments - Draft 1.doc >> | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Start Date: 4/8/01; HourAhead hour: 4; No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.
LOG MESSAGES:
PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001040804.txt
---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
Details: (Hour: 4 / Preferred: 12.00 / Final: 11.98)
TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
SC_ID: ECTRT
MKT_TYPE: 2
TRANS_DATE: 4/8/01
TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_SKEETER
ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
---------------------- Forwarded by Todd Peterson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
03/06/2001 01:53 PM ---------------------------
"Kurman, Michael" <[email protected]> on 12/12/2000 08:34:17 AM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc: "Massey, Eugene" <[email protected]>, "Basu, Sumanto"
<[email protected]>
Subject: COU Answers
Todd --
Following are some thoughts on Jane Michalek's questions. We've discussed
these briefly with Gene (who is out of town on business); I expect he'll
first become available by Wednesday evening. In the meantime, feel free to
contact me by e-mail ([email protected]) or telephone (202/857-6345) if
you'd like to discuss.
Regards.
Question 1. Is there a relevant "Port Authority" at the EcoEl,ctrica
terminal? If not, why is this contained in the document?
Answer: Based on our previous inquiries, it is our understanding that the
Puerto Rico Ports Authority (referred in the document) has jurisdiction, and
that the Authority has a designated "Port Captain" with responsibility for
the harbors of Guayanilla, Tallaboa and Ponce. We have not previously
determined the full extent of the Authority's functions and/or regulatory
authority.
Question 2. In Section 2.1, is there an Attachment "A"?
Answer: Although Attachment A has not previously been prepared, it was
intended to be a verbatim listing of those marine and transportation-related
requirements that were set forth among the 47 listed items in the Appendix
(titled "Environmental Conditions and Mitigating Measures") to the FERC's
Order of May 15, 1996, granting EcoEl,ctrica authorization under Section 3
of the Natural Gas Act. Among those which would be included are items #23
and #24 (relating to manatees and sea turtles).
Question 3. Do the LNG Interests have an Emergency Response Plan? Does this
Plan have references to actions required in 7.1?
Answer: An "Emergency Response Plan" is not referenced in the COU, and we
are uncertain as to the status regarding development or implementation of
any such Plan -- either from the Coast Guard perspective or that of the FERC
(see, e.g., item #45 of the FERC's Environmental Conditions and Mitigating
Measures).
Question 4. Do the insurance requirements of the "vessel interests"
duplicate or override what is required of Cabot LNG in Section 6.2 of the
sales contract? Should the LNG interests provide same insurance
documentation? Ditto Section 12.
Answer: The insurance requirements in Section 6.2(b)(viii) of the Sales
Contract are general in nature. The insurance requirements in the COU -- a
four-party agreement contemplated by, but beyond the scope of, the Sales
Contract -- supplement the Sales Contract provisions and apply to the
liability limits set forth in COU Clause 10.
Regarding insurance documentation under Clauses 11 and 12, we assume that
the LNG Interests could agree to mutual obligations (see, e.g., Clause 11.2
as to documentation by the Vessel Interests). However, we note that the COU
is essentially geared towards an "Incident," and as an Incident is caused by
an LNG Tanker, the Vessel Interests are the focus of Clauses 11 and 12. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
From: Climaton Research Co.
http://www.climaton.com/
Subjects: 1. Weather & Electricity Demand Forecast Online
2. Weather Derivatives Online - Data & Pricing Tools
To: Vincent Kaminski
ENRON Corporation
As a professional concerned with power and weather's effects
on power demand, you must be interested in the two online services
provided on http://www.climaton.com/
1. Weather & Electricity Demand Forecast Online
http://www.climaton.com/
(When prompted, please use
user name: guest
password: power
valid until 11/20/00)
Weather-based daily electricity demand forecast for each
of the next 7 days is issued every morning, for the entire U.S.,
9 geographical regions, 48 individual states, and over the service
area of most U.S. power companies. This information can assist power
producers in scheduling their power plant operation, help users to
plan for potential interruption. Power traders can use this info
to predict short-term power price movement. So, visit
http://www.climaton.com/ now and see how power demand is responding
to the cold front currently attacking most part of the country.
2. Weather Derivatives Online - Data & Pricing Tools
http://www.climaton.com/
You can view and obtain historical HDD and CDD data and
statistics for the past 50 years for nearly 500 weather stations in
the United States. You can also easily price an HDD or CDD call or
put option for these stations, using easy-to-use online pricing tools.
So, visit http://www.climaton.com/ now and see how you like it.
Thank you.
Climaton Research Co.
11/17/00 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
OLSON,CINDY K has suggested reviewers and submitted them for your approval.
You may review/modify this list of reviewers by logging on to PEP at
http://pep.corp.enron.com and going to Supervisor Services. Please
remember, no feedback can be completed on OLSON,CINDY K until you have
approved the list. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
The book NG-X-OPT-NG has been set-up.
User ID: ADM92257
Password: WELCOME!
The Crude trades will flip to the NG-X-OPT-WTI book. The Us Power trades will flip to the NG-XOPT-PWR book.
Please call if you have any questions.
Karen O'Day
EnronOnline
713-345-4135
-----Original Message-----
From: Sweitzer, Tara
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 11:39 AM
To: O'day, Karen
Cc: Lees, Lisa; Moorer, Torrey
Subject: FW: Andy Zipper's Set-Up
Could you please set up these books so I am able to set-up the counterparty alternative. Thanks for your help this week! TARA
-----Original Message-----
From: McLaughlin Jr., Errol
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 10:27 AM
To: Sweitzer, Tara
Subject: Andy Zipper's Set-Up
Tara,
Andy's books are as follows:
NG-X-OPT-NG (gas)
NG-X-OPT-WTI (crude)
NG-X-OPT-PWR (power)
Let's use the natural gas book as the one he logs in under.
Thanks,
Errol, X5-8274 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
No word from Mark yet. Do you have a number for him?
Thanks,
Johnny
-----Original Message-----
From: Arnold, John
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 8:18 AM
To: Palmer, Johnny
Subject: FW:
Johnny:
I'll get Mark Findsen to call you. Can you have at least 1 trader interview him as well.
Thanks,
John
-----Original Message-----
From: Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 8:16 AM
To: Arnold, John
Cc: Palmer, Johnny
Subject: RE:
I'll set it up as orig.
Johnny, can you set this up?
-----Original Message-----
From: Arnold, John
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 6:37 PM
To: Shankman, Jeffrey A.; Nowlan Jr., John L.
Subject:
Not so impressed with David goldman. For a guy who has worked in derivatives for 10 years, couldnt answer some simple questions. Very poor financial derivatives knowledge even though he worked at CRT for a long time and a Lyonnais for a while. The only value I see in him is that he worked at BP for a while and might have some knowledge as to how they work. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
We have decided not to make any reps about these plans, since any buyer would not be taking them. However, we have a data room list that specifies what was made available, and the other side is welcome to review most of what is in that room. We remain cautious about releasing employment compensation data and contract information about individuals, but are happy to provide totals of current and future costs under those agreements in the aggregate. Let me know if you have questions.
Which deal are you actively working on? Fire or Wind? Do I need to be working on the draft agreement?
Thanks.
Michelle
-----Original Message-----
From: Davis, Angela
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 6:39 PM
To: Cash, Michelle
Subject: Benefit Plans of Newco employees
We need a list of all benefit plans of any "to be" Newco employee. We also rep that we have made these available to the purchaser. I believe you said that the actual documents were available somewhere, so I assume that the other side could see them?
Angela D. Davis
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB3817
Houston, Texas 77019
Tel: (713) 345-8347
Fax: (713) 646-3393
e-mail: [email protected] | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Cal-ISO seeks forward contracting authority
09/20/2000
Generation Week
(c) Copyright 2000 Pasha Publications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
The California Independent System Operator (Cal-ISO) "most reluctantly" asked
FERC last week to approve tariff amendments that would allow the system
operator to obtain forward contracts.
Further, in an effort to discourage utilities from leaning on the ISO for
power, The ISO wants to allocate the costs of those contracts to scheduling
coordinators whose forward schedules do not reflect their actual real-time
demands. The allocation of those costs would be proportional to the sizes of
the deviations. This would be a change from the current system, in which
energy purchasing to balance load is spread among all market participants.
"Fairness, as well as providing appropriate economic incentives to scheduling
coordinators to align their forward and real-time schedules, dictates this
allocation," the Cal-ISO's filing states.
Recently, Cal-ISO President and CEO Terry Winter had unsuccessfully sought
approval from the ISO Board of Governors to approve an amendment to the ISO's
tariff to require scheduling coordinators to include at least 90% of actual
loads, with generation and imports sufficient to balance their schedules, in
final day-ahead schedules, and 95% of actual load in final hour-ahead
schedules. Scheduling coordinators would have had to bear the costs of the
ISO's out-of-market power purchases to balance the load. Coordinators would
have been allocated the costs of those arrangements in proportion to the
deviations of their actual real-time loads from their scheduled loads (GW
8/30).
The ISO is asking for authority to enter into forward contracts without first
soliciting bids because a formal bid process would take too long in a
fast-moving market.
FERC has directed the ISO to enter into forward contracts as a means of
better assuring that load requirements are met. FERC expressed its concern in
an order refusing San Diego Gas & Electric's request for a cap of indefinite
duration on energy sold in the California Power Exchange. FERC ordered "the
ISO to immediately institute a more forward approach to procuring the
resources necessary to reliably operate the grid."
The ISO said it is in total agreement with FERC's observation that a
reasonable supply portfolio would make use of forward contracting as a hedge
against price volatility. The ISO noted that the grid operator and FERC are
in agreement that fulfillment of forward contracting is a responsibility that
best resides with load-serving utilities.
"Unfortunately, and for reasons not at all apparent to the ISO, the utilities
thus far have been denied that authority," the Cal-ISO filing stated, noting
the decision to empower the utilities rests California Public Utilities
Commission. The ISO said it is applying for the tools to enter into forward
contracts, but expressed hope that load-serving entities would "receive and
exercise the authority to discharge a responsibility that more properly is
theirs."
The ISO said it doesn't want to be placed in the position as a competing
market player.
"The ISO continues to believe that its market activities should be
constrained to an absolute minimum and that, most particularly, it should not
be competing against load-serving entities for the energy needed to satisfy
load that is reasonably predictable," the Cal-ISO said.
The Cal-ISO wants forward contracting authority because the grid operator
needs to buy increasing amounts of power at the last minute to balance supply
and load on the grid. The ISO has been scrambling through real-time and
ancillary services markets to find this balancing power.
Originally, the California market system was set up so that utilities would
buy most of the state's power needs through the California Power Exchange's
(Cal-PX) day-ahead market. State regulators have not given utilities
authority to do extensive forward contracting outside the Cal-PX, and
utilities have been increasingly inclined to under schedule their actual
needs in the Cal-PX and lean on the ISO to provide the balance of the power
for their customers.
Saying that underscheduling of load continues to be a problem and cautioning
that unseasonably warm days occur in the fall, the ISO asked FERC to waive
the typical 60-day notice required for tariff amendments and allow the
changes to take effect immediately.
"What the ISO seeks are the tools necessary to enable it to contract if
available forward commitments appear reasonable," the system operator's
filing says. The ISO said it does not believe other, related FERC orders
require it to forward contract. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Attached is a new draft of the letter Bill sent yesterday. Please let us know if you have any suggestions.
Daphne E. Gilbert
Assistant to Bill L. Bryant, Jr.
Katz, Kutter, Haigler, Alderman, Bryant & Yon, PA
(850) 425-1676
www.katzlaw.com
_______________________________________
This transmission is intended to be delivered only to the named addressee(s) and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary, attorney work-product or attorney-client privileged. If this information is received by anyone other than the named addressee(s), the recipient should immediately notify the sender by E-MAIL and by telephone (850) 224-9634 and obtain instructions as to the disposal of the transmitted material. In no event shall this material be read, used, copied, reproduced, stored or retained by anyone other than the named addressee(s), except with the express consent of the sender or the named addressee(s). Thank you.
- 07 12 01 Letter Draft.doc | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.
Midday Market View(TM) for Tuesday, July 31, 2001
as of 1:00PM EDT
Information provided by Standard & Poor's
================================================================
U.S. INDICES
(1:00 p.m. EDT)
----------------------------------
Market Value Change
DJIA 10,546.40 + 144.70
Nasdaq Comp. 2,050.20 + 32.36
S&P 500 1,219.36 + 14.84
----------------------------------
NYSE Advancing Issues 1,977
NYSE Declining Issues 1,032
NYSE Trading Volume 584 mln
NASDAQ Advancing Issues 1,992
NASDAQ Declining Issues 1,473
NASDAQ Trading Volume 854 mln
==================================
U.S. TREASURIES
----------------------------------
Value Yield Change
1-year bill 3.40% n/a
5-year note 4.50% + 6/32
10-year note 5.03% + 6/32
30-year bond 5.50% + 3/32
The tables above look best when viewed in a fixed-width font,
such as "Courier."
================================================================
U.S. TRADING SUMMARY
Equities didn't flinch at the weak U.S. economic data released
this morning as the major averages hovered around opening levels
and took the news in stride. The headline indexes quickly moved
higher and extended their gains ahead of the noon hour before
some consolidation set in. The broad-based rally saw the Dow
initially taking the lead, then handing the ball off to the
tech-heavy NASDAQ, which shot higher by about 1.8% at midday. On
the technical front, resistance for the NASDAQ lies at its
50-day moving average of 2,097. Outperforming industries in the
S&P 500 included the drug, financial, health care, semiconductor
and computer software/system industries. The oil, electric and
railroad sectors were under-performing.
----------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. TREASURY SUMMARY
Treasuries were higher by midday as a slew of weak data helped
bolster investor confidence that the slowing economy would spur
the Fed to again lower interest rates. Indeed, the whole yield
curve was in the green by midday with the short end
outperforming its longer-term counterparts, even though stocks
were enjoying a strong rally of their own. Data on both consumer
confidence and a regional measure of manufacturing activity
showed much larger-than-expected declines, which bode poorly for
the economy and suggested that activity in manufacturing may not
have hit bottom yet. The data suggested to some that the Fed may
have to be more aggressive than previously thought. Others,
however, felt that the data was weak, but would just add to the
Fed's resolve to continue on its expected path of cutting
interest rates by 25 basis points at its next meeting in August.
----------------------------------------------------------------
CURRENCY SUMMARY
Talk is circulating that the Brazilian Central Bank has been
behind the dollar's rally back to 125 yen from 124.6 yen. The
bank floated a 200 billion yen ($1.6 billion) bond issue today
and the speculation is that the bank has sold the yen proceeds
to buy dollars. Elsewhere, euro bulls have been frustrated by
the lack of follow-through buying on the weak U.S. data
offering. The euro briefly touched 0.878 dollars per euro, but
has since sunk below the 0.875 level.
----------------------------------------------------------------
MAJOR COMPANY / INDUSTRY NEWS
(All prices as of 1:05 p.m. EDT)
** DirecTV, a unit of General Motors' (GM: 63.98, + 1.08) Hughes
Corp. (GMH: 19.32, + 0.02) division, is preparing to sue about 1
million people who are pirating DirecTV's signal using
unauthorized access cards and equipment, according to The Wall
Street Journal. DirecTV wants damages from the illegal users and
has shifted its focus from the distributors of the equipment to
the many who use it. As many as 100,000 names and addresses were
collected from searches of alleged illegal equipment operators.
DirecTV has sent strongly worded mailings to the individuals
suspected of pirating the digital signals.
** Large utility firm Entergy (ETR: 37.54, + 0.25) reported
fiscal second-quarter earnings that beat Wall Street's recently
raised estimates. The company reported earning almost $239
million, or $1.06 per share, versus roughly $224 million, or
$0.98 per share, in the year-ago quarter. Analysts had the
company pegged to earn $0.95 on average. Strong profits from its
nuclear power and energy trading divisions helped boost
earnings.
** Online brokerage firm Ameritrade Holdings (AMTD: 6.41, +
0.50) agreed on Tuesday to acquire rival firm National Discount
Brokers Group, which is a subsidiary of Deutsche Bank AG. The
price tag was $154 million in an all-stock deal in which
Ameritrade will issue between 21 million and 32 million shares
to finance the deal. When the deal is finally complete, National
Discount Brokers will own between 10% and 14% of Ameritrade's
stock.
----------------------------------------------------------------
RESEARCH SPOTLIGHTS
** Goldman Sachs upgraded shares of Freeport McMoran Copper &
Gold Inc. (FCX: 10.73, + 0.23) from a market outperformer to
their U.S. recommended list.
** Salomon Smith Barney upgraded shares of Express Scripts
(ESRX: 58.00, + 0.96) from an outperform to a buy rating.
** A.G. Edwards upgraded shares of DST Systems (DST: 47.02, +
0.57) from an accumulate to a buy rating.
################################################################
Log in using the links below to:
Access your account:
https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=CCBodyi&NeedCASelValue=Y
View your Email Alert customization options:
https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=EAMyAlerts
Perform research or request a market quote:
https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=Quotes
Place a trade order:
https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=TradeStock
To visit Schwab's home page, use this link:
http://www.schwab.com/
-----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe or modify your Email Alert customization options,
log in using the link below or copy and paste it into your
browser's address window:
https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=EAMyAlerts
Now you can receive graphics Email Alerts in HTML format, using
helpful, full-color graphics and active Web links that connect
you directly to information you want. Use the link below to log
in and change your email format preference:
https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=EAEditEmailAddr
----------------------------------------------------------------
Notice: All email sent to or from the Charles Schwab corporate
email system may be retained, monitored and/or reviewed by
Schwab personnel. (1000-8752)
Copyright 2001 Standard & Poor's MMS Inc. All rights reserved.
Standard & Poor's MMS services are for personal use only.
Commercial use or redistribution in any form, print or
electronic, is prohibited.
Distribution by Quris, Inc. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
OK this is metered production on CNG.
Gloria will let us know which CNG contract to path this deal with.
The meter numbers are 50089201, 5105901, and 5118301 and this is CES
production.
After Gloria lets us know which contract(s) to use, Angie will path this deal
in Sitara with a zero volume.
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 04/04/2000 02:42
PM ---------------------------
From: John M Singer @ ENRON 04/04/2000 02:31 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Devonian Resources
I believe that this is metered production. We hav a fixed price contract
through Aug00.
Chris Germany@ECT
04/04/2000 01:59 PM
To: John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Devonian Resources
If this is metered production then its not cut (it just flows to the pool).
If its pool gas then it probably is cut, so you tell me. Metered production
or pool gas on CNG?
From: John M Singer @ ENRON 04/04/2000 01:39 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Devonian Resources
Why was this gas cut??
My Phone number is 330-493-7790.
John
Chris Germany@ECT
04/04/2000 01:01 PM
To: John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Angie Zeman/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Devonian Resources
I took the volume on deal 226742 (Devonian Resources) to 0 for April.
Hey John, give me a call when you get a chance so we can chat about this.
Also, send me your phone number. I can't find it. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Will send right away!
Mark Schroeder@ECT
01/26/2001 07:07 AM
To: Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Hennemeyer/LON/ECT@ECT, Thomas Schmitz/FRA/ECT@ECT, Carsten
Haack/FRA/ECT@ECT, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: can you get this to Ken Lay in Davos
Rosalee - attached are some talking points prepared by our German gas
origination team. They would like to have these forwarded to Ken in Davos,
where the person we would like Ken to speak with is also in attendance. That
is Mr. Ulf Boge, the President of the Federal Cartel Office (FCO) of
Germany. The FCO is about to dismiss a complaint we filed, on rather
specious procedural grounds. We regard this as an important case, and if Ken
could have word with Boge about how important we regard this case, it would
help. thanks mcs | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
SBX 6 and SBX 33 both passed out of the Senate Appropriations Committee
on a straight party line vote. The bills could be taken up on the
Senate floor as early as this afternoon depending upon when the Senate
decides to meet next. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I sent it to Gerald last week - it is an electronic authorization form to transact on Kern's rapids system - need to return by 11/30.
Have a nice few days off and see you Monday.
SM
-----Original Message-----
From: Tycholiz, Barry
Sent: Wed 11/21/2001 9:18 AM
To: Miller, Stephanie
Cc:
Subject: RE: Anything happening today?
Not really...someone from Williams called you regarding a document that needs to be signed by the 30th.. is that a C/A for NWPipe....
She was covering for Jan, I did not get a chance to take the call, just heard about it...
BT
-----Original Message-----
From: Miller, Stephanie
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 9:05 AM
To: Tycholiz, Barry
Subject: Anything happening today? | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I am not sure I understand the question. Do you mean at anytime we call on SBA volumes, we never/should not allocate the location?
-----Original Message-----
From: Winckowski, Michele
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 1:32 PM
To: Bodnar, Michael; Blair, Lynn
Cc: Cabrera, Reyna; Medeles, Gerry
Subject: RE: SBA Contracts
I guess the question is - have we ever actually reviewed when we call on the SBA volumes and what the system conditions have been during those periods. We want to verify that we are not allocating a point when we have SBA gas flowing. Theatrically, we argue that we would not call on SBAs if the gas was not needed to meet system requirements. We' want to verify that the theory and the actual match up. I hope this makes sense. Thanks MW
-----Original Message-----
From: Bodnar, Michael
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 1:15 PM
To: Winckowski, Michele; Blair, Lynn
Cc: Cabrera, Reyna; Medeles, Gerry
Subject: RE: SBA Contracts
Yes, you are correct. The changes in the business requirements for the scheduling priority of SBA contracts will not impact NNG's primary firm shippers. What do you need to verify and support this fact?
-----Original Message-----
From: Winckowski, Michele
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 2:53 PM
To: Blair, Lynn; Bodnar, Michael
Subject: SBA Contracts
Contract Shippers Contract Date
107018 Tenaska Marketing Ventures Nov 1 2000
107019 Texaco Gas Marketing Nov 1 2000
107021 OGE Energy Resources Nov 1 2000
107989 Tenaska Marketing Jun 1 2001
108021 Arkla Energy Marketing Co. Jul 1 2001
108284 Tensaka Marketing Ventures Nov 1 2001
108290 Texaco Gas Marketing Nov 1 2001
108281 El Paso Merchant Energy Nov 1 2001
108282 UtiliCorp United, Inc. Nov 1 2001
108283 Engage Energy American Nov 1 2001
These are the SBA contracts that were provided during the due diligence. I'd like to be able to verify and support that the changes in the business requirements for the scheduling priority for these SBA contracts do not result in an impact to NNG's primary firm shippers. Your assistance would be greatly appreciated. Thanks MW | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Today we released additional information about our related party and off-balance sheet transactions. We have made this information available both on our website and in a Form 8-K filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
The information provides further details about:
-- the $1.2 billion charge to shareholders' equity announced in the third quarter and the transactions related to that charge;
-- a restatement of prior years' financial statements to reflect this reduction in shareholders' equity, the consolidation of three entities and prior year proposed audit adjustments and reclassifications;
-- the Special Committee appointed by the Enron Board of Directors to review transactions between Enron and related parties;
-- the LJM limited partnerships, including a discussion of transactions between Enron and LJM entities; and
-- transactions between Enron and other Enron employees.
This information addresses a number of concerns that have been raised by our shareholders and the SEC. As our Board's new Special Committee continues its review of various matters, we will continue to cooperate fully with the SEC in its investigation, and we will continue to respond to investor requests so that they can evaluate, appreciate and appropriately value the strength of our core businesses.
Restatement of Earnings
Based on information that we have recently obtained, Enron and its auditors determined that certain off-balance sheet entities should have been included in Enron's consolidated financial statements pursuant to generally accepted accounting principles. As a result, Enron will restate its financial statements from 1997 to 2000 and for the first and second quarters of 2001. These restatements have no material effect on Enron's current financial position. Here are some details included in the filing:
Net income for each period will be impacted by the retroactive consolidation of Joint Energy Development Investments (JEDI) and Chewco beginning in November 1997, the consolidation of an LJM1 subsidiary for 1999 and 2000 and prior year proposed audit adjustments. Enron's current assessment indicates that the restatement will include:
-- a reduction of approximately $96 million in 1997
-- a reduction of approximately $113 million in 1998
-- a reduction of approximately $250 million in 1999
-- a reduction of approximately $132 million in 2000
-- an increase of approximately $17 million for the first quarter of 2001
-- an increase of approximately $5 million for the second quarter of 2001
-- a reduction of $17 million for the third quarter of 2001.
The consolidation of JEDI and Chewco also will increase Enron's debt by approximately $711 million in 1997, $561 million in 1998, $685 million in 1999 and $628 million in 2000.
The restatement will have no material impact on Enron's reported earnings for the nine-month period ending September 2001.
You can obtain more detailed information on the items described above by accessing the Form 8-K filing at <http://www.enron.com/corp/sec/>.
We will continue to review our strategic, operational and financial position, and we will continue to keep you updated on any developments. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
do we have a date for interviewing Tim Mccarty yet? Did I send him a letter? df | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Vince and Vasant:
Here is a brief summary of my meeting with Chris Germany, Capacity Trader at
the East Desk, related to gas transmission:
Typically, pipelines lease capacity billed on a monthly basis. An example
might be the pipeline between South Texas and Brooklyn, where you might pay
$12.00 per month per 10,000 decatherms of capacity ($0.40 per day), a fixed
payment. Variable charges are 6% for fuel costs ("shrinkage") and 6.5% for
overhead expenses. A gas trader might call South Texas and be quoted a
delivery price tomorrow of NYMEX - $0.10 ("basis"), and might call Brooklyn
and be quoted a delivered price of NYMEX + $0.25 . The trader's spread is
$0.35, and variable costs of transmission are $0.125, so the trader would
offer the leaseholder of capacity up to $0.225 for firm capacity tomorrow.
As for the distinction betweem firm and interruptible, the leaseholders have
an excellent knowledge of the firm-equivalent of interruptible capacity.
Also, many pipelines don't discount firm capacity from the tariff maximum
("it's not worth their time to haggle") (There is a further issue of
"secondary markets" not important to the model yet). For South Texas and
Brooklyn, there are several different routes the gas can physically take
(pipelines of Enron, Texas Eastern, etc). And, once the trade is in the
system traders can cover the (Enron) positions on each end of the pipeline,
in so doing freeing up the capacity for other contracts.
Clayton | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/11/2001
08:15 AM ---------------------------
"Chris Strickland" <[email protected]> on 01/11/2001 04:08:57 AM
Please respond to "Chris Strickland" <[email protected]>
To: "Vince (home)" <[email protected]>, "VinceJKaminski"
<[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: EPRM article
Hi Vince,
?
I promise to contact you next time just for a chat instead of askig you to
do someting again! Robin e-mailed me today about the next EPRM article, whih
was timely as I have just completed this draft. Please could you cast you
eye over the article and let me have any comments as soon as possible?
?
Are you happy to continue with these articles? We are very happy at our
continued association with yourself.
?
Best regards for 2001.
?
Chris.
- EPRM_05_sim_mrjd.doc | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Thanks Ivy. Your end date is correct.
-----Original Message-----
From: "Ivy Kao" <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 1:03 PM
To: Germany, Chris
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Capacity Release
Chris:
The offer is now on our Iroquois OnLine system and has an offer number of 50153. The only thing I've added is Liz Dennehy's email address which I have as [email protected].
Also the offer term end date is 4/1/2002 at 09:00. If I left it at your 3/31/2002 09:00 then they wouldn't be able to nominate it on the very last day of the month. Please let me know if that is ok. Thanks.
Ivy
"Germany, Chris" wrote:
> Ivy
>
> I have been having problems trying to log into Iroquois EBB to release capacity to Boston Gas. Please release the following capacity to Boston Gas for March 2002, pre-arranged, subject to bid. It should be the same as offer 50136 for February 2002.
>
> Releasing shipper contact Chris Germany
> Phone number 713-853-4743
> Fax number 713-646-3037
> email address [email protected]
> Releasing contract number: 6999
> Begin Term 3/1/2002
> End Term 3/31/2002
> MDQ 35,465
> Minimum bid volume 35,465
> Receipt Point Waddington
> Delivery Point Tenn/Wright
> Bid period start 2/26/02 1:00 PM
> Bid period end 2/26/02 2:00 PM
> Prearranged bid rate 100% of max rate
> Prearranged bidder Boston Gas
> Prearranged bidder contact Liz Danehy
> Phone number 617-723-5512
> Fax number 617-323-5372
> email address
>
> Let me know if I missed something.
>
> Thanks
> Chris Germany
>
> **********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at [email protected] and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
> **********************************************************************
- ivy_kao.vcf << File: ivy_kao.vcf >> | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
<<RE:>> Your message
To: Megan La
Subject: RE:
Sent: Fri, 3 Nov 2000 10:38:41 -0500
was delivered to the following recipient(s):
Megan La on Fri, 3 Nov 2000 09:38:48 -0500
MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:NORTH AMERICA:LURCH
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
From: [email protected]
To: Megan La <[email protected]>
Subject: RE:
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2000 10:38:41 -0500
Return-Receipt-To: [email protected]
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
X-MS-Embedded-Report:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
-----Original Message-----
From: Gillis, Brian
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 6:42 AM
To: Gossett, Jeffrey C.
Subject: FW: Final Deal List
I'll be sending you the effect by book as well.
-----Original Message-----
From: Gillis, Brian
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 5:39 AM
To: Clark, Morris; Whiting, Greg; Carrington, Clara; Su, Ellen; Scott, Laura
Subject: Final Deal List
Here is the final deal list. Per discussion with Laura, we made our final target 1.03 Bill USD, in order to leave the proper flexibility for accounting. Final deal count is 458. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Please find attached the FINAL Name Change/Merger Notification Report for
January. To launch the report, double click on the attachment and select
"Enable Macros" and "Read Only". The Jan 01 Changes tab summarizes
additions to the report since Jan. 15.
Please note that:
ERMS short names will be changed in GCP and ERMS each Friday at 10am Central
Time, and
Inactivations will be made on Feb 1
For more information, please click below:
Each month now has two sheets, a summary sheet (eg Jan 01 Changes) and a
detailed sheet (eg Jan 01).
Click below for more information:
The summary sheet can be used to view all changes after a certain date. If
you're aware of all changes up to, say, January 15th enter 01/16/2001 in cell
C6 of the Summary Sheet and click the Sort button in cell H6. All changes
made to the report on or after January 16th will be listed automatically.
The Summary sheet may also be sorted for certain criteria - use the drop down
arrows alongside the column headers to make your selection.
This sheet contains all the information you are used to seeing, but slightly
reformatted. Key points are:
In the case of an Inactivation, the cause of the Inactivation (eg Merger) is
listed in the Comments section
As with the previous format,
all months' reports will be sent cumulatively throughout the year
the report will be sent out twice each month, on the 15th and at the end of
the month.
It is our aim to publish the report in Livelink and to send out only the
summary sheet and a URL for the detailed report each month. This will save a
lot of space in Lotus Notes and we hope it will streamline your monitoring
process.
We'd be very happy to receive any comments you may have. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
The impacts of IRAQ suspending oil shipments could affect markets as early as
mid-December.
---------------------- Forwarded by Lorna Brennan/ET&S/Enron on 11/29/2000
04:59 PM ---------------------------
[email protected] on 11/29/2000 04:29:14 PM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Iraq's Antisanctions Campaign: Prospects and Implications - CERA
Decision Brief
**********************************************************************
CERA Decision Brief: Sent Wed, November 29, 2000
**********************************************************************
Title: Iraq's Antisanctions Campaign: Prospects and Implications
Author: Placke
E-Mail Category: Decision Brief
Product Line: World Oil ,
URL: http://www.cera.com/cfm/track/eprofile.cfm?u=5526&m=1429 ,
Alternative URL:
http://www.cera.com/client/wo/db/112900_16/wo_db_112900_16_ab.html
*********************************************************
The Iraqi regime,s campaign to neutralize and eliminate the UN sanctions that
have
constrained it for ten years is gathering momentum. Of immediate significance
is the
growing likelihood that the antisanctions campaign will again pit Iraq
against the UN
Security Council--this time in a struggle over the financial controls at the
heart of
the "oil for food" program, whose current phase expires December 5. Such a
struggle
could lead to suspension of Iraqi oil exports, perhaps for a few weeks, as has
previously occurred, but possibly for considerably longer. Should such a
scenario
unfold, the effect on a still tight and nervous oil market would be dramatic.
**end**
Follow URL for complete report.
*********************************************************
Come Shoot the Rapids with us at CERAWeek2001, "Shooting the Rapids:
Strategies and Risks for the Energy Future" in Houston, February 12-16,
2001! For more information and to register, please visit
http://www.cera.com/ceraweek/
*********************************************************
**********************************************************************
Account Changes
To edit your personal account information, including your e-mail
address, etc. go to: http://eprofile.cera.com/cfm/edit/account.cfm
This electronic message and attachments, if any, contain information
from Cambridge Energy Research Associates, Inc. (CERA) which is
confidential and may be privileged. Unauthorized disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this message or any attachments,
in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited.
Terms of Use: http://www.cera.com/tos.html
Questions/Comments: [email protected]
Copyright 2000. Cambridge Energy Research Associates | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Ben,
The total MW on the California assets increased by 41. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
forgot to add 100% load factor last time | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I'll discuss with Carlos.
ckm
From: Ann Elizabeth White @ ECT 05/21/2001 05:07 PM
To: Carlos Sole
cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Midway Project - Generic Interconnect Agreement
I'm leaving on vacation after tomorrow for 2 1/2 weeks and there's no way I
can get to this before I leave. Would you please handle this for me in the
interim? If not, please talk to Kay about who could handle this for Greg in
my absence. It may just need to go to outside counsel.
Thanks!
---------------------- Forwarded by Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT on 05/21/2001
05:06 PM ---------------------------
From: Christi L Nicolay 05/21/2001 04:21 PM
To: Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carlos Sole/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Midway Project - Generic Interconnect Agreement
I will review this, but one of you needs to also. Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 05/21/2001
04:20 PM ---------------------------
Greg Krause@ENRON
05/21/2001 04:00 PM
To: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Midway Project - Generic Interconnect Agreement
Please see attached for your review and comments. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
This deal is starting to get confusing.... so here is the whole deal
effective 3/21 to 3/31.
gulf / leach/coh 22-3
38011/46 8979/8711/8527
51875/25 3657/3548/3473
60599/7 3159/3065/3000
63895/6 3686/3576/3500
63895/8 0/1917/1876 This piece from TCO pool.
No contracts are currently overrun.
Cindy/Kathy/Jesse - we are pulling 19481 from your p20 pool on contract
63895, which max's out the contract. Any additional Aristech coh 22-3 sale
will have to be from TCO pool.
Kara - we are delivering to coh 22-3 as follows:
38011 = 8527
51875 = 3473
60599 = 3000
63895 = 5376
John - I have 550,154 being pulled from p20 for the month. I hope that ties
to your number. I cannot pull any additional gas from p20, because this would
overrun your FTS1 contract. The 1 dkt SIT can be made up from Enron's TCO
pool. Please verify that this is okay. I'll schedule it for 3/23 gas day.
Thank you everyone for your patience!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Chris Germany@ECT
03/21/2000 09:40 AM
To: Joan Veselack/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jesse
Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, [email protected]
cc: Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: CES/Aristech deal
I sold CES 2727dt of CGLF mainline gas (deal 221731) effective 21st-31st.
Aristech only had enough mainline capacity to pull away 751 dt. I changed
the volume on this deal and created another sale to CES at the CGAS pool
(deal 222359) for a volume of 1917 dt.
2727 - 751 = 1976 at mainline.
1976 at mainline less fuel of 2.988% = 1917 at the CGAS pool.
Price = $2.77
.1045 variable cost mainline to Leach
.0250 demand charge
---------
2.8995 CGAS price.
Please let me know if you have any questions. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Grant Masson
Phone: (713) 664 7260 (h)
(713) 853 4768 (o)
(713) 420 2118 (EPG)
(281) 381 9983 (c)
(281) 381 9987 (c) Valerie
[email protected]
[email protected] | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Please see the attached for details. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Two new Product Types have been created and require approval. In the
DataManager you will find:
US Jet Kero Fin Swap - which you will find in Partialy Approved
and
US West Power Phy Spd - which you will find in Awaiting Approval.
The automated e-mail function associated with the notification of parties
when a Product Type is created or approved is not functioning, and we are
working to have the problem fixed. In the interim, please approve the Product
Types and send me an e-mail when you are done.
As you would expect the respective commercial areas are eager to have these
Product Types availabble for trading.
Dale
3-9746 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Start Date: 1/13/02; HourAhead hour: 8; No ancillary schedules awarded. No variances detected.
LOG MESSAGES:
PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011308.txt | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I just wanted to give all of you an update to my previous message on the
replacement for Brian Heinrich in Financial Operations. Jennifer Blay was
going to be his replacement; however, Jennifer has accepted a position in
Energy Operations working for Jeff Sorenson. The newest addition to the
Financial Operations staff is Holly Heath who joins us from Bank United. She
is located at EB-2419A and can be reached at Ext. 3-5843. In addition, Sarah
Brown will transfer as Manager of the Consolidated Reporting Team from the
Gas and Transmission Assets Team in the Business Analysis and Reporting
organization. Sarah is located at EB-2419B and can be reached at Ext. 3-3417.
Brian will be helping to transition Holly into her new responsibilities. As
such, you will be receiving E-mails from Brian during the next week or so.
After that, Holly will begin to request information directly from you.
Please join me in welcoming both Holly and Sarah into their new roles.
Thanks for your patience during the next few weeks. If you have any
questions, please do not hesitate to call me.
Lisa Cousino
x3-6343 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Ned. Attached is the CA with some comments incorporated. Please let me know
if you have any questions. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Gary, could you let me know the status of the NOVEMBER PPA's which would
be billed with December commodity billing (actually billed in January)? I want to be sure
you received all of the information from the field to make the November PPA adjustments
for December production close.
My assumption is that you have received all required PPA's since I did not receive a list of
outstanding meter information you need from the field.
If you have any questions, please give me a call. Thanks. Lynn | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
please note 2 hours as sick time for me today. thanks!
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
[email protected]
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax 713-646-3490 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
FYI - I made my staff burn the midnight oil last night putting together TW/NNG revenue summaries for review by the bankers that Rod/Kevin are working with. Thought you might me interested in the report. It gives a nice snapshot of our activity with our major counterparties.
-----Original Message-----
From: Corman, Shelley
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 11:05 AM
To: Hayslett, Rod
Cc: Geaccone, Tracy
Subject: TW Revenues by Counterparty
Importance: High
First worksheet show summary gross transportation revenue by counterparty for the 12 months ended 9/30/01. Total transport revenue is $180.6 million. Other worksheets show detail by contract and contract expiration dates. This information has been furnished to Kevin Howard. The only open question is how this data can be reconciled to financials. I spoke with Tracy this morning and she reflects gross operating revenues for TW for this period of $200 M. The difference is primarily fuel sales (which are not currently included in my numbers). | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Just wanted to pass a quick note to say thanks for all of your help that the
three of you each gave me concerning cluster analysis. Your help was
invaluable . As you may have been aware, we were performing the cluster
analysis to define the commercial zones in ERCOT. I only had a few days in
which to learn the FASTCLUS procedure in SAS and prepare graphical views of
the results.
Your assistance ensured that Enron was seen as one of three market leaders
who had the capability to perform the analysis and cross check other market
participants analysis. We were the only participant who had the ability to
graphically display the results.
I was able to take the lead in a commercial meeting because of the data and
results. I just wanted you guys to know that I really appreciated your help.
I have attached a couple of files that show some of the results. The
presentation has the best overview.
Best Regards,
Lance | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 10/12/2000
06:00 PM ---------------------------
Carol Coats
10/12/2000 04:56 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Datren Williams Acceptance
What a kind and thoughtful man you always are, Vince....I have always
appreciated
that in you! I just moved to another position this week - with Sheila
Knudsen in ENA
Compensation, but I will always remember how wonderful you are with the
Associates
and Analysts in the Program, and will miss having the opportunity to touch
base with
you occasionally. Thank you for being the special man you are!
Carol
P.S. I doubt that you know who I am, but I had worked with the program for
two years,
having been hired by Mike Smalling in October 1998. When I first moved to
Houston
(from Ohio) and Enron, I rode the #35 bus for a short while. You helped me
find Enron the first
day I rode it, but I didn't know who you were until I saw you at our Super
Saturday
activities. You will never know how much that assistance meant to me - a
shy,
street-dumb girl from Toledo, Ohio, in a city like Houston, who didn't know
how to
ride a bus! All of Enron loves you, and I know why!
Vince J Kaminski
10/12/2000 04:32 PM
To: Carol Coats/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Datren Williams Acceptance
Carol,
Thanks.
Vince
Carol Coats
10/12/2000 04:09 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Datren Williams Acceptance
You are right, Vince....Celeste and I did discuss it, and she approved his
Feb. start date.
Datren does know about that, so it sounds like it is cleared up.
Thanks so much, and we are sorry for the confusion!
Carol
Vince J Kaminski
10/12/2000 03:58 PM
To: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Carol Coats/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Datren Williams Acceptance
Stinson,
I think it's a mistake. It should be February.
Vince
Stinson Gibner
10/10/2000 08:11 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Datren Williams Acceptance
FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT on 10/10/2000
08:10 PM ---------------------------
Carol Coats
09/29/2000 02:36 PM
To: Celeste Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Datren Williams Acceptance
Celeste,
I just received Datren Williams' acceptance with the following note attached:
"My graduation date (Ph.D. Candidate from LSU) is Dec. 2000. Celeste Roberts
has informed me that I would have the option of starting work Feb. 2001. I am
under the impression that I will start in Feb. 2001. My offer letter has a
start date
of Aug. 2001. If this is a problem, please give me a call.
Looking forward to working at Enron.
Thanks a million,
Datren W."
Please let me know if he may in fact start in Feb. 2001, and if so, do you
have
a specific date for him, or may he choose?
Thanks, Celeste,
Carol | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I've scheduled the conference room for 2 hours. We are also looking at
Friday am. Is Friday better for you guys?
Kay
Christi L Nicolay@ECT
08/23/2000 10:15 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Larry Soderquist/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Edgecombe
Kay--I have a conference call at 9 tomorrow, so will be late to the meeting.
From: Kay Mann @ ENRON 08/22/2000 02:56 PM
To: John Moore/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey Keenan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christi L
Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Edgecombe
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 08/22/2000 02:54
PM ---------------------------
[email protected] on 08/22/2000 02:33:04 PM
To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Edgecombe
Attached is a draft blackline and clean copy of the Edgecombe PPA. We did not
address the issue of security in this draft, but still regard it as an open
item
subject to further discussion.
We look forward to receiving the information on the fuel arrangements,
equipment
specifications and construction cost estimates so we can better evaluate the
proposal you presented last Thursday.
(See attached file: VP August 21 2000 blackline PPA.DOC)(See attached file: VP
August 21 2000 clean PPA.DOC)
- VP August 21 2000 blackline PPA.DOC
- VP August 21 2000 clean PPA.DOC | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
($.1162) | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Below, please find the agenda for the "California Crisis Meeting" tomorrow,
Friday, February 16.
gngr
713-853-7751 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
John, here is a power point slide that provides a draft outline of the problem at hand. It is very draft in nature but I wanted to get the working version over to you ASAP. I wanted to get this discussion going via written format so that I (or others who may implement this) can stay focused on what you want and not get into broader research, etc....
I think I can put a model together if we can define what parameters, the interface (levers) and model (transfer functions) to use that would be useful for you as phase I product.
I will fire off updates to this document as I make them. If you have a spec doc or ideas that you want to hand write on a print out, please do so and I will update the document.
I will like to make sure that I am on the same page before beginning to code the program and to start linking to additional moths (month 2, 3, ..) and different curves, etc.
My Job search has gone well with the Crude desk and I am waiting compensation indication from them to make my decision. Also, Kevin Presto feels that I could potentially help his power group with new market or spread trading. John Suarez is a director who came from the power desk to EBS is going back to work for Kevin Presto. I may have an opportunity to build the southeast market by supporting John.
I am very grateful that I met you and other key Enron traders during this job search.
Ravi Thuraisingham, CFA
Director, Storage Trading
Enron Broadband Services
p 713.853.3057
c 713.516.5440
pg 877.680.4806
[email protected]
-----Original Message-----
From: Arnold, John
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 3:47 PM
To: Thuraisingham, Ravi
Subject: RE: Neural Networks
not necessarily looking for predictive power. that's a 3 year project. just for market making skillset. The work that Dave Forster did was just for front month. That creates month 1. Then, similar logic has to create a month 1/month 2 spread to create a month 2 outright market. Same for month 2/ month 3 to create month 3. There might be 24-36 individual markets to create a forward curve. Sometimes month 1 has correlation to the month 1/ month 2 spread. Sometimes it does not. Must create a system that is mechanical but very easy for a human to add bias.
-----Original Message-----
From: Thuraisingham, Ravi
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 10:20 AM
To: Arnold, John
Subject: Neural Networks
John, I just wanted to give you heads up that I did look into the subject system to learn from what your trading activities and then figure ways to automate some aspects of you daily activities. I will try to send you a few power point slides showing my initial thoughts on the system.
It appears that neutral network (AI is a subset of this class of learning systems) type of model that takes input from all available sources (including actual market feedback, weather and other fundamentals) and uses curve building functions and other existing tools as transfer functions, along with your own thinking (your processing functions that your neurons are wired up to do), could help the neural network to learn and eventually provide the necessary predictive power.
Ravi Thuraisingham, CFA
Director, Storage Trading
Enron Broadband Services
p 713.853.3057
c 713.516.5440
pg 877.680.4806
[email protected] | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
You are going to be so very mad at me, but I have lost my ATM card. Can you cancel my card. I think this proves that I am no allowed to have an ATM card in the future. Call me.
-----Original Message-----
From: Erb, Kim [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 9:28 AM
To: Shelley Corman (E-mail)
Subject:
Q,
I saw you called what do you need? I'm in a class and can call at break if
you need to talk, otherwise email me.
Kim | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Mr. Reeves,
Entex Gas Marketing intends to assign certain interruptible gas
transportation agreements to a new company of theirs which is:
Entex Gas Resources Corp. (it is a TX Corp.)
P.O. Box 200905
Houston, TX 77216
Would you please run a credit check on this new entity.
Thanks,
Eric Gillaspie
713-345-7667
Enron Building 3886 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 06/01/2000 04:48 PM -----
Julie Meyers
06/01/2000 04:01 PM
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: J. Aron & Company
Please take me off you distribution. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
FYI
-----Original Message-----
From: Millar, John
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 3:37 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Cc: Gadd, Eric; Chavez, Gabriel
Subject: Draft Term Sheet
Hello Bill,
As I mentioned in the phone message, we're still working on achieving favorable pricing for our heat recovery proposal at Transwestern's Station 1 near Kingman, AZ. In addition to revising our cost estimates for the proposed configuration, we are also considering adding generating capacity to achieve greater efficiencies. The results of our efforts will be forthcoming in a few weeks.
In the meantime, would you be so kind as to please review the attached draft term sheet and provide general (and, of course, non-binding) comments regarding the usefulness and acceptability of the terms listed and identify any terms we missed? Since we pipeliners aren't really in the power business, we wrote this mainly from scratch and would appreciate some feedback as to whether we're even close to an industry standard for this type of project. Thanks in advance for your time. I don't mean to be a pest, but I would really like to see this sensible idea evolve into a functioning and reliable power plant. Please don't hesitate to call with questions.
Sincerely,
John
713-345-8920 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
They should be removed from Keavey's portfolio.
Bilal Bajwa
11/21/2000 03:02 PM
To: Frank Hayden/Corp/Enron@Enron, Susan D Trevino/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ganapathy
Ramesh/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Abel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Repeated Books!
The following books are being counted under both J_Williams and P_Keavey and
need to be removed from one of the traders...
FT-PEOPLES-BAS
FT-PEOPLES-PRC
Bilal | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Paul: I am negotiating a new futures agreement for Gary. Do have any
input? Thanks.
Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas 77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
[email protected] | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Charles Freeman
3253 Chestnut Avenue
Baltimore, MD 21211
[email protected]
To Mr. Ken Lay,
I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you
made from selling Enron stock before the company
declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee
Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's
employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide
relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't
afford to pay their energy bills. Enron and you made
millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers
and from the efforts of your employees.
Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of
Enron's employees were financially devastated when the
company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans
were wiped out. And Enron made an astronomical profit
during the California energy crisis last year. As a result,
there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay
their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is
bankrupt.
The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million
worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the
company's employees to keep buying it. Please donate this
money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those
Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.
Sincerely,
Charles Freeman
Charles Freeman | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
What a tangled mess. please call and splain what's going on here. Thanks. DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 05/11/2000
09:57 AM ---------------------------
From: Bob Chandler 05/10/2000 10:33 AM
To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@Enron, Dan Fancler/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: TW Proposal for Fuel Retention in Dollars (not in-kind) -- Draft
Accounting Memo
Please note that if TW eventually decides to file for a tariff change to
allow cash in lieu of in-kind fuel retention that Rod would like to see our
proposed accounting methodology included in the filing.
---------------------- Forwarded by Bob Chandler/ET&S/Enron on 05/10/2000
10:26 AM ---------------------------
Rod Hayslett
05/10/2000 10:25 AM
To: Bob Chandler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: TW Proposal for Fuel Retention in Dollars (not in-kind) -- Draft
Accounting Memo
If FERC is going to tell us the accounting or specifically approve our
proposed accounting then I have no issues. I do not want to have a tariff
change with our interpretation of accounting requirements for it, without
that specific approval. So I guess we need to specifically ask for approval
of the accounting.
From: Bob Chandler 05/10/2000 09:32 AM
To: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: TW Proposal for Fuel Retention in Dollars (not in-kind) -- Draft
Accounting Memo
See responses below.
Rod Hayslett
05/10/2000 06:38 AM
To: Bob Chandler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: TW Proposal for Fuel Retention in Dollars (not in-kind) -- Draft
Accounting Memo
Some simple questions?
As I indicated this morning, it's not that I "want" to classify these credits
as revenues in order to achieve any commercial, regulatory, overhead
allocation or tax objectives, but if all other factors are considered equal
believe that revenue treatment is the most appropriate decision from both
GAAP and FERC USofA standpoints.
FERC USofA
In the "Shipper Supplied Gas" section of Order 581 the Commission concluded
that "it is not appropriate to mandate revenue recognition for gas provided
by shippers for compressor fuel and other pipeline system use and used to
provide transportation services. Instead, each pipeline will have the
discretion to determine whether it will recognize revenue for these
transactions in its accounting records...Pipelines electing to recognize
shipper provided gas as revenue must also recognize an equal amount of
purchased gas expense. Pipelines would credit the appropriate transportation
revenue account (Accounts 489.1 through 489.4) and record an equal amount in
Account 805, Other Gas Purchases." We have chosen not to recognize
revenue, but we do want to track our transactions, so we debit and credit
different subaccounts of acct 805. The over-retained volumes on TW are
debited to acct 805 and credited to acct 495 Other Revenues (also in
accordance with Order 581. However, for internal reporting we map the 495
credit to cost of transport (expense). Sounds reasonable to me. Will
you be able to continue that in SAP? Yes. We'll be using statistical orders
in lieu of subaccounts.
While the Commission agreed that pipelines would not be required to recognize
shipper provided gas on its books, it did require those who chose to do so to
record it as transportation revenue, not as a credit to fuel or gas purchase
expense.
GAAP
Revenues. Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 6 defines revenues
as inflows or other enhancements of assets of an entity or settlements of its
liabilities (or a combination of both) from delivering or purchasing goods,
rendering services, or other activities that constitute the entity's ongoing
major or central operations.
In the TW proposal the cash inflows are the result of a fuel charge factor in
the transportation tariff. TW's ongoing major or central operation is the
rendering of natural gas transportation services to shippers pursuant to its
tariff. Therefore the credits resulting from the assessment of the fuel
charge constitute transportation revenues. I don't think there is a
limitation with respect to cash received in lieu of gas. When gas is
retained we can debit and credit 805 and it's a wash. When we receive cash
we have to charge a balance sheet account (Cash) and credit an income
statement account. We can't opt out of recording an earnings creating
transaction. What is the argument that this cash does not just take the
place of Gas you would have received and should track the normal accounting
for gas? The cash alone cannot take the place of a retained volume; the cash
together with a gas purchase is the volumetric equivalent of a volume
retained. Under this proposal we would charge gas purchase expense when the
cash is used to buy gas that would replace the volumes not retained in
kind. I am concerned that what you are proposing may not work as well after
the next rate case (since I don't believe it likely we will be allowed to
continue to collect the windfall) and we may be setting ourselves up for
restatements. But I guess it really won't matter, because whatever we do
FERC will have specifically ordered us to account for it that way, isn't that
right? There is nothing about our current or proposed accounting that would
have to be changed as the result of a future rate case that changes the
volumetric retention factors. However, if a tracker is imposed, then we
would have additional entries to make, similar to those we now make on NNG.
In any event, the imbalance cashout approach described below would result
in the recording of fuel retention entries (debit and credit account 805)
exactly the same as we now record for volumes retained. It would merely
result in the additional entry to resolve the imbalance by debiting cash and
crediting the imbalance receivable from the shipper.
Expenses. Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 5 speaks to the
recognition of expenses and losses: "Further guidance for recognition of
expenses and losses is intended to recognize consumption (using up) of
economic benefits...during a period. Expenses...are generally recognized
when an entity's economic benefits are used up in delivering or producing
goods, rendering service, or other activities that constitute its ongoing
major or central operations..."
In the TW proposal natural gas volumes are consumed in the operation of
compressor engines to render natural gas transportation service to
shippers...the ongoing major or central operation of the company. Receiving
cash from shippers in accordance with the Tariff's fuel charge does not
reduce the consumption of natural gas volumes in rendering transportation
service, Instead it provides economic assets (cash) to the company to pay for
the gas volumes that have to be acquired to run the compressors. Therefore
the proceeds from the fuel charge represent transportation revenues for the
company, not a fuel or gas purchase expense reduction. I recently
received a memo from Susan Scott (Legal) indicating that in approving tariff
changes to allow shippers to pay cash for fuel use rather than to provide
in-kind volumes, FERC looks at the situation as being analogous to cashing
out an imbalance, where the imbalance was created by the shipper not
delivering the fuel retention volumes. If we followed FERC's lead here we
would record the fuel retention entries with a debit and credit to Account
805, then credit the cash receipt from the shipper as a reduction of its
imbalance. Any gain or loss on the cash-out would be credited to Acct 495
(gain) or charged to Acct 813 (loss), just like any other gain or loss on
resolution of an imbalance.
I think the cashout approach will probably meet the objective of not bloating
reported margins...at least if the tariff language is consistent with this
concept. If you prefer this cashout approach to my original proposal to
record fee revenue, then I will go ahead and re-draft the accounting memo
along those lines. Any final determination of the appropriate accounting,
though, would have to be made after the language in the tariff revision is
finalized. However, if the cashout approach is your preference, then I expect
that we could work with Rates to make sure that the tariff language doesn't
conflict with the cashout approach.
Shall I re-draft and recirculate the memo using the cashout approach?
Rod Hayslett
05/08/2000 06:32 AM
To: Bob Chandler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: TW Proposal for Fuel Retention in Dollars (not in-kind) -- Draft
Accounting Memo
I guess I'd like to understand the reason for wanting to call them
revenue?
From: Bob Chandler 05/05/2000 06:04 PM
To: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: TW Proposal for Fuel Retention in Dollars (not in-kind) -- Draft
Accounting Memo
I don't disagree that there are frequently numerous ways to account for
things--and some ways are better than others for tax, regulatory, financing
and other purposes. From an historical perspective before Order 636 we
didn't seem to have any difficulty recording the proceeds from the PGA
tracker portion of the tariff as transportation revenue. Under the proposed
circumstances, we are charging a fee based on average fuel retention
percentages that are set somewhat higher than actual consumption and there is
no requirement for a true-up. In this circumstance, even though we may call
it a fuel reimbursement factor, it seems to be more characteristic of revenue
than expense credit.
That having been said, if it's deemed to be advantageous to the company to
account for these cash proceeds as an expense credit, I could support
crediting the proceeds to a/c 805 similar to our accounting for volumetric
fuel retention. If that's the path you'd like us to follow, I'll amend the
draft memo accordingly. Please confirm.
Rod Hayslett
05/05/2000 06:58 AM
To: Bob Chandler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Dan Fancler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: TW Proposal for Fuel Retention in Dollars (not in-kind) -- Draft
Accounting Memo
My first blush problems are 2. 1) This is really reimbursement for an
item that is designated an expense - compressor fuel and so I don't know why
you want to show it as revenue. 2) Having a stat order will not help
the income statement presentation of revenues, a lower percentage of costs
being recovered from demand charges, a major factor if we decide to make TW
really stand on its own.
What is the reason for wanting to bloat the revenue in the income
statement? Explain the logic for showing a revenue item for the contra of
an item that has been determined to be an expense.
From: Bob Chandler 05/04/2000 04:16 PM
To: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@Enron
cc: Dan Fancler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: TW Proposal for Fuel Retention in Dollars (not in-kind) -- Draft
Accounting Memo
If we go with the transport revenue approach, we would for sure set up a
separate SAP statistical order to accumulate the fuel reimbursement fee
separately from the other revenue components. If you think this approach is
distortive from a reporting trend perspective, we could classify these
revenues as "other gas revenues" on our GAAP statements--similar to the way
we've classified excess fuel retention revenue in TW's 1999 GAAP statements.
Rod Hayslett
05/04/2000 02:41 PM
To: Bob Chandler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Dan Fancler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: TW Proposal for Fuel Retention in Dollars (not in-kind) -- Draft
Accounting Memo
I would think at a minimum we would like to have some kind of a tracking
account (nojn-FERC) for accounting purposes to be able to tell the earnigs
impact of the transactions. I have a problem with recording the revenue
in a plain transportation revenue account since it will skew the percentage
of transport revenues collected from demand charges which is an important
piece for the financial world. Ultimately I guess FERC will tell us how to
account for it.
From: Bob Chandler 05/04/2000 12:55 PM
To: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON,
Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen
Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Steve Klimesh/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dan Fancler/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Rod
Hayslett/FGT/Enron@Enron, Jerry Thomas Moore/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: TW Proposal for Fuel Retention in Dollars (not in-kind) -- Draft
Accounting Memo
From what we have so far been able to learn about the referenced proposal,
and after discussions with Dan Fancler, I prepared the attached draft of an
accounting memorandum for your consideration.
Please advise if you have additional facts or ideas to be considered.
By copy of this memo I'm asking Jerry Moore for excise tax advice as to
whether TW would risk incurring excise tax if we record gas sales to the
shippers and then retain the volumes for fuel. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Dale,
Thanks for the update. I fully concur with all the rankings.
It seems things are going well with the Research Group in
London and this is, to a very large extent, your contribution.
I think that Anjam has improved a lot. I don't think, however,
that he can run the group in the future. Steve emerged as a natural
leader and has overwhelming support in the organization.
Vince
Dale Surbey
06/15/2000 02:28 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: London Research PRC
Vince,
We had the PRC preranking for RAC and Research in London yesterday. Here's
how everyone came out:
Steven - Superior: No controversy here. Steve received consistently strong
feedback (ranked as either superior or excellent in all categories). The
only rough spot was teamwork, arising from the friction between Anjam and
himself.
Anjam - Excellent: Anjam received rankings of Superiors or Excellents in all
categories. Several reviewers commented that Anjam's performance in the
areas of producing results in a timely manner and communication have
improved. I felt the overall ranking of excellent was justified based on
this feedback, even though in terms of leadership I don't rate him high
enough to run the group here.
Stinsen provided the most insightful comment on Anjam's performance:
"Technically superior but lets his quest for a leadership position detract
from his overall performance".
On a related topic, Anjam has been taking random days off, typically on short
notice, so I suspect he's interviewing for a new job. Given his inability to
work with Steven (especially in the future when Stephen heads the group),
this may be the best long-term solution. Any thoughts?
Ben - Superior: Another non-controversial ranking. Ben received
consistently high marks from all the groups he supports, especially in the
area of non-technical skills.
I nominated Ben for promotion to Senior Specialist. Even though he was
promoted at year end, he's taken on a lot of responsibility training Kirstee
and helping manage the other quant resources in Brian's group. Also, since
Kirstee was hired in at the same level as Ben, a mid-year promotion is
appropriate since he's effectively her supervisor.
Kirstee - Strong: Only limited feedback in the 2 months she's been here.
High marks for technical/quantitative, strong in the "soft" skills. I think
the strong rating is the right message for early in the game - gives her a
target for improvement for the rest of the year.
- Dale | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Daren
We just did a deal for the rest of the month for 10,000/d at meter # 1552
QE-1 @ $4.355 .... can you let me and Robert Lloyd know what the sitara # is?
Thanks | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
T H U R S D A Y E X T R E M E M A R K E T S
A complimentary service from INO.com ( http://www.ino.com/ )
Thursday: The CRB Index is lower 0.63 points to 209.13. The
US Dollar Index trended lower by 0.27 points to 119.09.
The Dow Industrials edged higher by 20.50 points, at 11090.74, while
the S&P 500 rose 6.93 points, last seen at 1276.96. The
Nasdaq Composite moved higher by 46.27 points to 2264.00.
### FREE Complete Copy: "Charting Made Easy" by John Murphy.
### An essential read and incredible offer!!
### http://www.ino.com/specials/infinity/
_____________________________________________________________________
Legendary Trader Battles The Trend and Claims Victory
_____________________________________________________________________
Dear Andrew:
At last, a genuine market indicator that makes trading futures a
whole lot easier and a ton more profitable . . .
Now it can be yours! Over 30 years of trading experience is
packed into this remarkable new video from the
INO.com Learning Center . . .
THE NEXT STEP IN MARKET ANALYSIS
An important new development occurred in the markets and
legendary trader Larry Williams wants you to know the secret.
From the comfort of your own living room, you can be among the
first to begin writing your own ticket to successful trading.
Learn powerful methods to manage risk with a few common sense
lessons. In this video, Larry attacks the question; 'Does
technical analysis really work?' and teaches the unique art and
interpretation of commercial trading sentiment analysis. You'll
learn how to fade the guru and 'do the opposite' of the masses to
build your own successful trading system.
Revolutionize your trading with the perfect market indicator
presented in this exclusive video only available for INO.com.
Endorsed by INO.com and proven in the markets!
I urge you to click here to learn more about this
startling discovery:
http://store.ino.com/sale/1DC1C/FMV2711-Victory
<a href="http://store.ino.com/sale/1DC1C/FMV2711-Victory">Click to Claim Victory!</a>
Order Toll Free 800-538-7424 - 410-867-7424
All claims on third-party products are made by the publisher
and not by INO.com. All Products Guaranteed.
_____________________________________________________________________
E X T R E M E M A R K E T C O M M E N T A R Y
_____________________________________________________________________
The STOCK INDEXES closed higher on Thursday lead by gains in chip
stocks, which jumped almost 7% on mixed news and ahead of Intel's
business update due after the close. The Nasdaq posted a new high
close for the week following Wednesday's setback due to light profit
taking. Momentum indicators remain bullish signaling that sideways to
higher prices near-term are possible. If the rally in both stock
indexes continues, May's highs are the next targets later this month.
The Dow managed to post a modest gain due to a late-session recovery.
Early weakness was tied to losses in tobacco and financial issues
after Philip Morris lost over 5% after a California jury ruled
Wednesday the company must pay a longtime smoker more than $3
billion. However, strength in networking, hardware and software
issues pulled the Dow higher ahead of the close. Closes above 11,350
or below 10,835.40 are needed to clear up near-term direction in the
Dow. Until then, look for two-sided trading to continue.
INTEREST RATES September bonds posted a key reversal down on Thursday
due to profit taking. Today's sell off was triggered by the latest
jobless claims report, which showed continued weakness in the labor
markets. Session highs fell short of testing the 38% retracement
level of this spring's decline crossing at 101-15. Additional
weakness on Friday would confirm today's bearish reversal pattern
thereby increasing the odds that the corrective rally off May's low
might have come to an end.
The CRB INDEX closed lower for the fourth day in a row due to
weakness in some energy markets, some precious metals, foods and
cattle. Momentum indicators remain bearish signaling that additional
weakness near-term is possible. Closes below 208.43 would confirm a
trading range breakout thereby opening the door for a larger-degree
decline during June.
ENERGY MARKETS closed mixed on Thursday. A slowdown in crude oil
deliveries to the U.S. Gulf refining sector and a number of refinery
snags and short covering after the recent declines.
July crude oil posted an inside day leaving Wednesday's key reversal
down unconfirmed. Momentum indicators are bearish but becoming
oversold hinting that Wednesday's low might have also marked a broad
double bottom with April's low crossing at 27.25. If the decline off
May's high continues, a test of April's low crossing at 25.90 is
possible later this month. It will take closes above 29.05 to temper
the near-term bearish outlook in the market.
July heating oil posted an inside day with a lower close on Thursday
due to continued fallout from this week's bearish inventory reports.
Closes below this week's low, which coincides with the 38%
retracement level of the December/May rally crossing at 75.66 would
open the door for additional weakness during June. Stochastics and
RSI are bearish signaling that additional weakness is possible.
July unleaded gas posted an inside day with a higher close due to
light short covering following Wednesday's trendline breakout and
test of the 50% retracement level crossing at 88.93. I would not be
surprised to see additional short covering and a possible test of
broken trendline support on Friday. If the decline continues the 62%
retracement level of this year's rally crossing at 85.62 is July's
next target. Momentum indicators are bearish but becoming oversold
warning bears that a corrective bounce is possible.
July Henry Hub natural gas posted an inside day with a lower close on
Thursday due to continued fallout from this week's bearish AGA
inventory report. Momentum indicators have turned bearish with this
week's decline, as the stage is set for sideways to lower prices into
the end of June due to seasonal weakness. Closes below May's low
would open the door for a possible test of weekly support crossing at
3.54 later this summer.
CURRENCIES The September Dollar posted an inside day due to light
profit taking thereby leaving Wednesday's key reversal up
unconfirmed. The door remains open for a test of weekly resistance
crossing at 121.50 later this month. It would take closes below May's
uptrend line crossing near 118.62, which coincides with gap support
to signal that a short-term top has likely been posted. The daily ADX
(a trend-following indicator) is bullish signaling that additional
strength is possible.
The September Swiss Franc closed lower on Thursday confirming
yesterday's key reversal down. However, closes below last week's low
at .5564 are needed to renew this spring's decline thereby setting
the stage for a test of weekly support crossing at .5508 later this
month. The daily ADX is still in a bearish trend mode signaling that
additional weakness near-term is possible.
The September Canadian Dollar closed higher on Thursday testing the
62% retracement level of this winter's decline crossing at .6573.
Profit taking ahead of the close tempered some of today's gains
leaving the door open for sideways trading on Friday. Momentum
indicators are bullish but becoming overbought warning bulls to use
caution as a short- term top might be near. If the rally continues,
gap resistance beginning at .6600 is the next target.
The September Japanese Yen closed higher on Thursday due to short
covering as it consolidated some of this week's losses. Momentum
indicators have turned bearish from overbought levels thereby
increasing the odds that a short- term may have been posted with last
week's high.
PRECIOUS METALS August gold posted an inside day with a slightly
higher on Thursday as it continues to consolidate around the 75%
retracement level of this spring's rally crossing at 267.20. Closes
above 269.60 or below 265.50 are needed to clear up near-term
direction in the market. If the decline resumes, the reaction low
crossing at 263.20 is August's next target. Weekly momentum
indicators remain bearish signaling that additional weakness during
June appears likely.
July silver closed slightly lower on Thursday but remains above
trading range support crossing at 4.31 cents. Stochastics and RSI are
bearish signaling that additional weakness is possible near-term.
Closes below 4.31 would open the door for a possible test of weekly
support crossing at 4.15 later this month.
July copper closed lower on Thursday thereby confirming yesterday's
downside reversal. Closes below Monday's low crossing at 74.55 would
renew the decline off May's high and open the door for a test of
weekly support crossing at 74.10 later this month. Stochastics and
RSI are bearish signaling that additional weakness near-term is
possible.
GRAINS July corn closed unchanged on Thursday. Early strength was
tied to another week of strong export sales and weather concerns both
in China and the Midwest. However, profit taking ahead of the close
erased early gains as floor sources indicated that traders are
reluctant to buy heavily into a cool/wet weather related rally this
early in the season. Closes above minor resistance at $2.00 is needed
to open the door for a possible test of May's high at 2.11 1/2 later
this month.
July wheat closed higher on Thursday following another week of strong
new-crop export sales. Additional support came from wet weather
across portions of the plains, which has slowed harvest progress,
especially for the soft red winter wheat crop, and is starting to
endanger quality. Wednesday's test and rebound off contract lows at
2.58 1/2 has left the market at an important crossroads. Closes above
2.72 or below 2.58 1/2 is needed to clear up near-term direction in
the market. Stochastics are giving a divergent buy signal with
today's rebound hinting that a double bottom may have been posted
with this week's low.
SOYBEAN COMPLEX July soybeans closed unchanged due to a round of
profit taking ahead of the close. Early strength was tied to
uncertainties over weather forecast as cool/wet conditions across the
Midwest continues to hamper early crop development and allow farmers
to complete this year's soybean planting. While recent highs have
opened the door for a possible test of March's high crossing at 4.77
1/2, today's poor performance also denotes that the undertone of the
market remains rather weak.
July soybean meal posted a downside reversal on Thursday following a
spike above the 62% retracement level crossing at 169.40. Additional
weakness on Friday is needed to confirm today's bearish reversal
pattern. Momentum indicators are bullish but also showing bearish
divergence warning bulls to use caution despite this week's push to
new contract highs. Closes below gap support crossing at 164.80 would
signal that a short-term top has likely been posted.
LIVESTOCK August hogs closed modestly higher on Thursday due to
improving cutout values and spillover strength from bellies. Light
fund and cash connected buying also underpinned today's rally. Today
also marked the official start of the Goldman roll as they were
selling July and buying August. If the rally resumes, April's high
crossing at 65.95 is August's next target. Closes below last week's
gap at 64.00 would strongly suggest that a short-term top has been
posted.
August cattle extended this week's decline closing lower for the
fourth day in a row. However, a short covering bounce ahead of the
close tempered some of today's losses leading to a mid-range close. A
short covering bounce on Friday is possible as traders bank some of
this week's short profits. Momentum indicators have turned bearish
signaling sideways to lower prices into mid-June are possible.
FOOD & FIBER July coffee closed lower on Thursday due to bearish
short-term weather forecasts for Brazil's coffee growing region. July
remains poised to test the late-May low crossing at 57.10. Closes
below this support level would renew this year's decline. However,
momentum indicators are oversold hinting that a short-term low is in
place or near. Closes above 60.80 are needed to temper the near-term
bearish outlook in the market.
July cocoa closed into new lows for the week thereby confirming the
recent breakout below this spring's trading range, which crosses at
955. Today's new low close for the month has renewed the decline off
May's high while setting the stage for a test of fib support crossing
at 862 later this month.
July sugar closed lower on Thursday thereby confirming yesterday's
key reversal down. Today's loss was enough to keep momentum
indicators bearish, as the stage is set for a possible test of last
week's low at 839. Closes below this support level would renew the
decline off May's high and open the door for a test of fib support
crossing at 832 then 808 later this month.
July cotton closed lower on Thursday as it continues to consolidate
above psychological support crossing at 40- cents. Closes above this
year's downtrend line crossing near 43.95 are needed to confirm a
bottom and trend change has taken place. Momentum indicators are
neutral to bullish signaling that sideways to higher prices near-term
are possible.
Daily Extreme Commentary is brought to you by GLOBALcharts,
INO.com's end-of-day charting software for Futures, Futures
Options and Optionable Stocks. http://www.globalcharts.com
Search the INO Store - http://store.ino.com/
_____________________________________________________________________
T O P N E W S
_____________________________________________________________________
STOCKS
Japan Stocks Review: Nikkei up 0.8% on position adjustment moves
http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=25663
Add2: US Equities Review: Higher; chip stocks soar despite warnings
http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=25661
UK Stocks Review: FTSE up with a little help from Wall Street
http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=25669
FOREX
US FX Review: Sterling trims losses ahead of UK elections
http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=25665
Asia FX Review: Dollar/yen hovers around 120.00 level
http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=25662
Europe FX Review: Sterling falls again ahead of poll results
http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=25664
CREDIT
US Credit Review: Profit-taking drives down most Treasuries
http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=25660
Europe Credit Review: Debt prices fall at open, never recover
http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=25666
Japan Credit Review: June ends slightly up in range-bound trades
http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=25668
COMMODITIES
US Futures Summary: Cocoa at almost 5-month low
http://news.ino.com/summary/?id=25667
EXCHANGES
OIC Reports May Equity Interest Hits New High
http://news.ino.com/press/?release=24535
NYBOT Announces Start Of Block Trading
http://news.ino.com/press/?release=24534
KFX Announces May Trading Volume Increases
http://news.ino.com/press/?release=24533
NYMEX Opts For Position Accountability Requirements
http://news.ino.com/press/?release=24532
Fast Start For INO.com's 'extreme SIGNALS' Futures Service
http://news.ino.com/press/?release=24531
CBOT Moves Forward With a/c/e/ Software Enhancements
http://news.ino.com/press/?release=24530
NASD Regulation Settles Five Day-Trading Actions
http://news.ino.com/press/?release=24529
Jiway Adds Another Country, Broadens Stock Coverage
http://news.ino.com/press/?release=24528
CME Revises Rules For Block Trading Of Eurodollars
http://news.ino.com/press/?release=24527
El Paso And WestLB Join European Energy Exchange
http://news.ino.com/press/?release=24526
____________________________________________________________________________
E X T R E M E F U T U R E S
____________________________________________________________________________
Updated every 10 minutes around the clock.
More at http://quotes.ino.com/analysis/extremes/futures/
WINNERS
NDM1 NASDAQ 100 Index Jun 2001 1959.00 51.00 +2.67
ZM1 U.S. Treasury 6% Bond Jun 2001 103 184/256 2 5/8 +2.60
HUF2 New York Harbor Unleaded Gasoline Jan 20 0.7526 0.0124 +1.64
NKU1 Nikkei 225 Stock Avg Sep 2001 13320 210 +1.60
WZ2 Wheat Dec 2002 333 5 +1.52
ZXM1 New Zealand Dollar/U.S. Dollar Jun 2001 0.4184 0.0059 +1.43
XRN1 Soybean Oil Jul 2001 15.13 0.20 +1.34
KWU1 Wheat Sep 2001 326 3/4 4 1/4 +1.32
XSU1 Soybeans Sep 2001 447 1/4 5 3/4 +1.30
XWU1 Wheat Sep 2001 275 3 1/2 +1.29
LOSERS
CCZ1 Cocoa Dec 2001 915 -43 -4.49
PNN1 Propane Jul 2001 0.4600 -0.0200 -4.17
SBK2 Sugar #11 World May 2002 7.85 -0.13 -1.65
DAQ1 BFP Milk Aug 2001 15.32 -0.23 -1.48
KCZ1 Coffee 'C' Dec 2001 64.50 -0.85 -1.30
SEN1 Sugar #14 Domestic Jul 2001 20.83 -0.27 -1.28
NTM1 Nikkei 300 Jun 2001 261.6 -2.5 -0.96
PAU1 Palladium Sep 2001 619.25 -6.00 -0.96
OJX2 Orange Juice Froz. Conc. #1 Nov 2002 98.40 -0.90 -0.91
TWM1 MSCI Taiwan Index Jun 2001 238.1 -2.1 -0.88
____________________________________________________________________________
E X T R E M E S T O C K S
____________________________________________________________________________
Updated every 10 minutes around the clock.
More at http://quotes.ino.com/analysis/extremes/stocks/
WINNERS
STEM STEMCELLS INC 5.41 2.13 +64.94
CANI CARREKER CORP 15.04 3.85 +34.22
OVTI OMNIVISION TECHNOLOGIES 5.50 1.15 +27.32
HDIIU HYPERTENS'N DIAGNOSTIC UNIT 7.60 1.60 +26.67
HABKE HAMILTON BANCORP 8.08 1.55 +24.22
CCBL C-COR.NET CORP 13.45 2.33 +21.86
SONE S1 CORP 13.76 2.29 +19.91
CTRA CENTRA SOFTWARE 15.75 2.50 +18.88
SALM SALEM COMMUNICATIONS CORP CL A 26.19 4.11 +18.45
CCEL CRYO-CELL INTL 5.94 0.89 +17.62
LOSERS
ORPH ORPHAN MEDICAL INC 11.25 -3.92 -26.13
CVTI COVENANT TRANSPORT 'A' 13.00 -3.56 -21.51
ALXN ALEXION PHARMACEUTICALS 24.12 -3.90 -13.98
GPI GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE 22.29 -3.49 -13.42
ELY CALLAWAY GOLF CO (DEL) 18.46 -2.76 -12.98
VRST VERISITY LTD 16.06 -2.35 -12.74
EMEX EMEX CORP 8.38 -1.20 -12.53
MRVT MIRAVANT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES 11.46 -1.53 -12.32
NOPT NEON COMM INC 5.42 -0.71 -11.54
BMM BMC INDUSTRIES 5.18 -0.65 -11.11
FREE MANAGED FUTURES & IRA RETIREMENT KIT
http://www.ino.com/specials/icm/
$$$$ Foreign Exchange Traders! INO.com now has
$$$$ real-time cross rates, FREE online at:
$$$$ http://quotes.ino.com/exchanges/forex-cross/
_____________________________________________________________________
T H A N K Y O U
_____________________________________________________________________
Thank you for subscribing to the Extreme Markets Daily Digest from INO.com
( http://www.ino.com/ ). If you want to subscribe to our other email
services, or would like to modify your profile please visit
http://www.ino.com/email/.
To subscribe a friend, visit:
http://www.ino.com/email/
To unsubscribe, visit:
http://www.ino.com/email/remove/[email protected]&list=evening
--
Copyright 1998-2001 INO.com. All Rights Reserved. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Guys:
See below resignation letter of Ivan van Niekerk - this is a huge loss for
our group, as Ivan was uniquely qualified to originate the South African
opportunities that we are pursuing. I spoke with him for about an hour today
asking him to reconsider as I believe that we are capable of addressing all
of his complaints. Unfortunately, Ivan indicates that he has already made up
his mind and that he does not want to go back on his word to his prospective
employer. He will give it some thought overnight and I will speak with him
again tomorrow (Fri). This is an example of the toll that excessive
administrative burdens are starting to take on commercial employees -
particularly acute in remote offices.
Stu
-----Original Message-----
From: Van Niekerk, Ivan
Sent: 30 May 2001 15:04
To: Farmer, Michael; Hutchinson, Michael; Staley, Stuart
Subject: Ivan - resignation
Michael / Stuart / Michael
Please see attachments. I will try to call all of you later today or tomorrow
morning to discuss.
This has been a very difficult decision. Only time will tell if it was the
right one.
Regards
Ivan | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
what girl? andrea? we will probably get together next week. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
RPI TO INITIATE PHASE II CLINICAL TRIALS ON ANTI-HEPATITIS C DRUG
BOULDER, Colorado - September 28, 2000: Ribozyme Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(RPI) (NASDAQ:RZYM) today announced that it has repurchased its rights to
Heptazyme? from Eli Lilly and Company and will initiate Phase II clinical
trials as soon as possible for the Anti-Hepatitis C ribozyme to study
dose-ranging and biological markers of the drug's efficacy in chronic
Hepatitis C patients.
Earlier this month, RPI and Eli Lilly and Company completed a 28 day study
of Heptazyme (LY466700) following daily subcutaneous injections that showed
successful safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics. The next phase of
clinical trials will examine the safety and efficacy of Heptazyme alone, at
higher doses than used in previous studies, and in combination with
interferon, a current treatment for patients with Hepatitis C virus
infection.
Lilly has directed the clinical trials for the Anti-Hepatitis C ribozyme to
date under a licensing agreement between the parties. Ribozyme
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. has now renegotiated the global rights to Heptazyme
and will direct all subsequent clinical trials. The Phase II trial is
expected to begin in the first quarter of 2001.
"We are pleased to be able to repurchase Heptazyme rights and to have
resources to develop it aggressively," said Ralph E. Christoffersen, CEO
and President of RPI. "We are committed to address the need for improved
therapies for HCV, and plan to move forward as quickly as feasible in
Heptazyme's development."
Ribozymes are the product of Nobel Prize winning science and are
synthetically engineered to act as "molecular scissors" capable of cleaving
target RNA in a highly specific manner.
RPI (www.rpi.com), located in Boulder, Colorado, is the acknowledged leader
in ribozyme therapeutic development. RPI has recently announced a ribozyme
commercial development program to develop a ribozyme therapeutic against
Hepatitis B. RPI is partnered with Chiron Corporation for the development
and commercialization of ANGIOZYME?, an anti-angiogenic ribozyme designed
to inhibit the growth of new blood supplies to tumors and prevent tumor
growth and metastasis. ANGIOZYME is in Phase I/II clinical trials in
cancer patients at the Cleveland Clinic. RPI is also partnered with an
affiliate of Elan Corporation plc for development and commercialization of
HERZYME?, an anti-HER-2 ribozyme for treatment of breast and other cancers,
through RPI's subsidiary Medizyme Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
RPI will have a Live Webcast regarding this information today at 3:00 pm
MDT. This webcast can be accessed through the RPI website (www.rpi.com) in
the Investor Relations section.
This press release contains forward-looking statements that involve risks
and uncertainties, and actual events or results may differ materially.
These risk factors include actions by the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration, technological advances, ability to obtain rights to
technology, ability to obtain and enforce patents, ability to commercialize
and manufacture products and general economic conditions. These and
additional risk factors are identified in RPI Securities and Exchange
Commission filings, including the Forms 10-K and 10-Q and in other SEC
filings. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
on holiday
-----Original Message-----
From: Denne, Karen
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 10:48 AM
To: Palmer, Mark A. (PR); Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.; Kean, Steven J.; Allen, Margaret
Subject: Gary Ackerman
Just got an email from Gary Ackerman of the Western Power Trading Forum that he'll be in Houston on Friday and will stop by at 2 p.m. If any of you are around, I'd love to introduce him (or if you already know him, just say hello). kd | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
FPL contract!
---------------------- Forwarded by Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT on 08/12/99 11:06
AM ---------------------------
Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.
From: [email protected] 08/12/99 11:51 AM
To: Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: 8/12 Redlined Draft of Gas Sales Agreement
Attached is the 8/12 redlined draft of the EMT/ECT Gas Sales
Agreement. This draft reflects EMT's changes from the 7/26 draft
provided by ECT. We request that ECT make a list of any issues,
concerns, or revisions to this 8/12 draft, which EMT and ECT can
discuss at the meeting on Tuesday, August 17th.
Please let us know if you have any questions or have any difficulty
accessing this document.
- doc.rtf | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
This deal is definitely on peak, says Matt Motley. It's a spread trade with
Natsource, and both are logged in his book as on peak. Let me know if the
broker still disputes this.
Kate
Kerri Thompson@ENRON
11/20/2000 01:11 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:
462066
matt m
broker has off peak | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Subsets and Splits