patrickbdevaney/mia9 · Datasets at Hugging Face

text stringlengths 0 6.44k
35. Russo S, Hissa K, Murphy B, Gunson B. Photovoice, emergency management and climate change: A
comparative case-study approach. Qualitative Research. 2020; 21(4): 568–585. 1468794120934398.
36. Bennett N, Dearden P. A picture of change: Using photovoice to explore social and environmental
change in coastal communities on the Andaman coast of Thailand. Local Environment. 2013; 18(9):
983–1001.
37. Chandler L, Baldwin C. Reflections from the water’s edge: Collaborative photographic narratives
addressing climate change [Paper in themed section: The Visual Narrative: Alternative Photographic
Exposures. Livingston D, editor]. Social Alternatives, 2013; 29(4): 30–36.
38. Cai Y. Bonding, bridging, and linking: Photovoice for resilience through social capital. Natural Hazards,
2017; 88(2): 1169–1195.
39. Jessee, N., Naquin, A., Parfait-Dardar, S., Verdin, C., Philippe, R., Edwards, T., et al. Beyond to stay or
move: The how and why of some communities. (Panel discussion) At what point managed retreat?
Resilience building in the coastal zone, conference. Columbia University. 2019; June 19–21.
40. Catalani C, Minkler M. Photovoice: A review of the literature in health and public health. Health Education & Behavior. 2010; 37(3): 424–451. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198109342084 PMID: 19797541
41. Lorenz L, Bush E. Critical and creative thinking and photovoice: Strategies for strengthening participation and inclusion. Health Promotion Practice. 2022; 23(2), 274–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/
15248399211055714 PMID: 35285330
42. Brown T, Martin RL. (2015). Design for action: How to use design thinking to make great things actually
happen. Harvard Business Review. 2015; 93(9): 57–64.
43. Liedtka J. Why design thinking works. Harvard Business Review. 2018; 96(5): 72–79.
44. Ericson JD. Mapping the relationship between critical thinking and design thinking. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. 2022; 13(1), 406–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00733-w
45. Mintrom M, Luetjens J. Design thinking in policymaking processes: Opportunities and challenges. Australian Journal of Public Administration. 2016; 75(3): 391–402.
46. Roberts J, Fisher T, Trowbridge M, Brent C. A design thinking framework for healthcare management
and innovation. Healthcare. 2016; 4: 11–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hjdsi.2015.12.002 PMID:
27001093
47. Jacob B, Schweitzer J, Wallace L, Dunford S, Barns S. Climate adapted people shelters: A transdisciplinary reimagining of public infrastructure through open, design-led innovation. In: Fam D, Neuhauser
L, Gibbs P. (eds) Transdisciplinary Theory, Practice and Education. 2018. Springer, Cham. https://doi.
org/10.1007/978-3-319-93743-4_17
48. Clune S, Roggema R, Horne R, Hunter S, Jones R, Martin J, et al. Design-led decision support for
regional climate adaptation. 2014. Victorian Centre for Climate Change Adaptation Research.
PLOS CLIMATE
Advancing a hyperlocal approach to community engagement in climate adaptation
PLOS Climate \| https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000041 June 8, 2022 25 / 26
49. Roggema R, Martin J, Remnant M, Alday G, Mansfield P. Design charrettes in two days: Sea Lake and
Bendigo. In The Design Charrette: Ways to Envision Sustainable Futures. 2014; 117–149. Springer,
Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7031-7_6
50. Govaerts B, Negra C, Camacho Villa T, Chavez Suarez X, Espinosa AD, Fonteyne S, et al. One CGIAR
and the Integrated Agri-food Systems Initiative: From short-termism to transformation of the world’s
food systems. PloS one. 2021; 16(6), e0252832. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252832 PMID:
34086831
51. Alice in Miami Dade. 2018. https://unitedwaymiami.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/2020-ALICEMiami-Dade-County-FL.pdf
52. U.S. Census. 2021. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/homesteadcityflorida
53. Orpana HM, Lang JJ, Yurkowski K. Original quantitative research-validation of a brief version of the
Social Provisions Scale using Canadian national survey data. Health Promotion and Chronic Disease
Prevention in Canada: Research, Policy and Practice. 2019; 39(12): 323–332.
54. Shealy T, Godwin A, Gardner H. Survey development to measure the gap between student awareness,
literacy and action to address human caused climate change. In ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings. 2017, June.
55. McCroskey JC. Communication competence and performance: A research and pedagogical perspective. Communication Education. 1982; 31(1): 1–7.
56. Leiserowitz A, Broad K. Florida: Public opinion on climate change. A Yale University/University of
Miami/Columbia University Poll. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change. 2008.
57. sSarabipour S, Khan A, Seah YFS, Mwakilili AD, Mumoki FN, Sa´ez PJ, et al. (2021). Changing scientific
meetings for the better. Nature Human Behaviour. 2021; 5(3), 296–300. https://doi.org/10.1038/
s41562-021-01067-y PMID: 33723404
58. Skiles M, Yang E, Reshef O, Muñoz DR, Cintron D, Lind ML, et al. Conference demographics and footprint changed by virtual platforms. Nature Sustainability. Woww; 5(2), 149–156. https://doi.org/10.
1038/s41893-021-00823-2
59. Wu J, Rajesh A, Huang YN, Chhugani K, Acharya R, Peng K, et al. Virtual meetings promise to eliminate geographical and administrative barriers and increase accessibility, diversity and inclusivity.
Nature Biotechnology. 2022; 40(1), 133–137. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-021-01176-z PMID:
34966181
PLOS CLIMATE
Advancing a hyperlocal approach to community engagement in climate adaptation
PLOS Climate \| https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000041 June 8, 2022 26 / 26
Total 383 29.96 ± 16.97
Miami City East Coast
East Coast Grass patch
No Entry Zone Virginia Key Grass patch
Channel through center of basin
Channel and Cuts South of Port Islands
107
Appendix 6. Spatial Environmental and Physical Descriptives. Average environmental and
physical data measurements of 30 sites in the POM basin. Mean environmental and physical
measurements listed ± standard deviation for temperature (°C), salinity (‰), turbidity (ntu),
sediment depth (cm), and water depth (cm). N = 14 total number of sample collections.
Refer to Figure 3. Red = Miami City East Coast; Light Green = East Coast Grass patch; Dark
Green = No Entry Zone Virginia Key Grass patch; Blue = Channel through center of basin;
Yellow = Channel and Cuts South of Port Islands.
Site
#
Surface
Temp
Bottom
Temp
Surface
Salinity
Bottom
Salinity
Sediment
Depth Water Depth Turbidity
1 27.67 ± 2.76 27.71 ±
30 27.14 ± 2.66 27.38 ± 2.59 33.56 ± 3.26 34.10 ± 2.22 105.43 ± 79.19 214.57 ± 82.52 2.69 ± 1.81
Total 27.42 ± 2.64 27.48 ± 2.65 33.05 ± 3.46 33.64 ± 2.53 130.28 ± 84.11 213.20 ± 79.04 2.58 ± 1.76

35. Russo S, Hissa K, Murphy B, Gunson B. Photovoice, emergency management and climate change: A

comparative case-study approach. Qualitative Research. 2020; 21(4): 568–585. 1468794120934398.

36. Bennett N, Dearden P. A picture of change: Using photovoice to explore social and environmental

change in coastal communities on the Andaman coast of Thailand. Local Environment. 2013; 18(9):

983–1001.

37. Chandler L, Baldwin C. Reflections from the water’s edge: Collaborative photographic narratives

addressing climate change [Paper in themed section: The Visual Narrative: Alternative Photographic

Exposures. Livingston D, editor]. Social Alternatives, 2013; 29(4): 30–36.

38. Cai Y. Bonding, bridging, and linking: Photovoice for resilience through social capital. Natural Hazards,

2017; 88(2): 1169–1195.

39. Jessee, N., Naquin, A., Parfait-Dardar, S., Verdin, C., Philippe, R., Edwards, T., et al. Beyond to stay or

move: The how and why of some communities. (Panel discussion) At what point managed retreat?

Resilience building in the coastal zone, conference. Columbia University. 2019; June 19–21.

40. Catalani C, Minkler M. Photovoice: A review of the literature in health and public health. Health Education & Behavior. 2010; 37(3): 424–451. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198109342084 PMID: 19797541

41. Lorenz L, Bush E. Critical and creative thinking and photovoice: Strategies for strengthening participation and inclusion. Health Promotion Practice. 2022; 23(2), 274–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/

15248399211055714 PMID: 35285330

42. Brown T, Martin RL. (2015). Design for action: How to use design thinking to make great things actually

happen. Harvard Business Review. 2015; 93(9): 57–64.

43. Liedtka J. Why design thinking works. Harvard Business Review. 2018; 96(5): 72–79.

44. Ericson JD. Mapping the relationship between critical thinking and design thinking. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. 2022; 13(1), 406–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00733-w

45. Mintrom M, Luetjens J. Design thinking in policymaking processes: Opportunities and challenges. Australian Journal of Public Administration. 2016; 75(3): 391–402.

46. Roberts J, Fisher T, Trowbridge M, Brent C. A design thinking framework for healthcare management

and innovation. Healthcare. 2016; 4: 11–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hjdsi.2015.12.002 PMID:

27001093

47. Jacob B, Schweitzer J, Wallace L, Dunford S, Barns S. Climate adapted people shelters: A transdisciplinary reimagining of public infrastructure through open, design-led innovation. In: Fam D, Neuhauser

L, Gibbs P. (eds) Transdisciplinary Theory, Practice and Education. 2018. Springer, Cham. https://doi.

org/10.1007/978-3-319-93743-4_17

48. Clune S, Roggema R, Horne R, Hunter S, Jones R, Martin J, et al. Design-led decision support for

regional climate adaptation. 2014. Victorian Centre for Climate Change Adaptation Research.

PLOS CLIMATE

Advancing a hyperlocal approach to community engagement in climate adaptation

PLOS Climate | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000041 June 8, 2022 25 / 26

49. Roggema R, Martin J, Remnant M, Alday G, Mansfield P. Design charrettes in two days: Sea Lake and

Bendigo. In The Design Charrette: Ways to Envision Sustainable Futures. 2014; 117–149. Springer,

Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7031-7_6

50. Govaerts B, Negra C, Camacho Villa T, Chavez Suarez X, Espinosa AD, Fonteyne S, et al. One CGIAR

and the Integrated Agri-food Systems Initiative: From short-termism to transformation of the world’s

food systems. PloS one. 2021; 16(6), e0252832. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252832 PMID:

34086831

51. Alice in Miami Dade. 2018. https://unitedwaymiami.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/2020-ALICEMiami-Dade-County-FL.pdf

52. U.S. Census. 2021. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/homesteadcityflorida

53. Orpana HM, Lang JJ, Yurkowski K. Original quantitative research-validation of a brief version of the

Social Provisions Scale using Canadian national survey data. Health Promotion and Chronic Disease

Prevention in Canada: Research, Policy and Practice. 2019; 39(12): 323–332.

54. Shealy T, Godwin A, Gardner H. Survey development to measure the gap between student awareness,

literacy and action to address human caused climate change. In ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings. 2017, June.

55. McCroskey JC. Communication competence and performance: A research and pedagogical perspective. Communication Education. 1982; 31(1): 1–7.

56. Leiserowitz A, Broad K. Florida: Public opinion on climate change. A Yale University/University of

Miami/Columbia University Poll. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change. 2008.

57. sSarabipour S, Khan A, Seah YFS, Mwakilili AD, Mumoki FN, Sa´ez PJ, et al. (2021). Changing scientific

meetings for the better. Nature Human Behaviour. 2021; 5(3), 296–300. https://doi.org/10.1038/

s41562-021-01067-y PMID: 33723404

58. Skiles M, Yang E, Reshef O, Muñoz DR, Cintron D, Lind ML, et al. Conference demographics and footprint changed by virtual platforms. Nature Sustainability. Woww; 5(2), 149–156. https://doi.org/10.

1038/s41893-021-00823-2

59. Wu J, Rajesh A, Huang YN, Chhugani K, Acharya R, Peng K, et al. Virtual meetings promise to eliminate geographical and administrative barriers and increase accessibility, diversity and inclusivity.

Nature Biotechnology. 2022; 40(1), 133–137. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-021-01176-z PMID:

34966181

PLOS CLIMATE

Advancing a hyperlocal approach to community engagement in climate adaptation

PLOS Climate | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000041 June 8, 2022 26 / 26

Total 383 29.96 ± 16.97

Miami City East Coast

East Coast Grass patch

No Entry Zone Virginia Key Grass patch

Channel through center of basin

Channel and Cuts South of Port Islands

107

Appendix 6. Spatial Environmental and Physical Descriptives. Average environmental and

physical data measurements of 30 sites in the POM basin. Mean environmental and physical

measurements listed ± standard deviation for temperature (°C), salinity (‰), turbidity (ntu),

sediment depth (cm), and water depth (cm). N = 14 total number of sample collections.

Refer to Figure 3. Red = Miami City East Coast; Light Green = East Coast Grass patch; Dark

Green = No Entry Zone Virginia Key Grass patch; Blue = Channel through center of basin;

Yellow = Channel and Cuts South of Port Islands.

Site

#

Surface

Temp

Bottom

Temp

Surface

Salinity

Bottom

Salinity

Sediment

Depth Water Depth Turbidity

1 27.67 ± 2.76 27.71 ±

30 27.14 ± 2.66 27.38 ± 2.59 33.56 ± 3.26 34.10 ± 2.22 105.43 ± 79.19 214.57 ± 82.52 2.69 ± 1.81

Total 27.42 ± 2.64 27.48 ± 2.65 33.05 ± 3.46 33.64 ± 2.53 130.28 ± 84.11 213.20 ± 79.04 2.58 ± 1.76