arg_1
stringlengths
4
5.08k
round_1
float64
2
8
ann_1
float64
1
2
arg_2
stringlengths
8
2.19k
round_2
float64
1
7
ann_2
float64
1
2
annotation_name
stringclasses
131 values
is_attacks
int64
0
1
However, I think that the article can be substantially improved if the following points are addressed: (1)
null
null
In Table II, Tonset DCS is a units of temperature, it should be used comma instead of decimal point.
1
2
cosmetics2030248_makarova
0
The article is well written, and the overall study was well planned and professionally conducted.
null
null
At line 167, “donateis” is typically used to represent donate money, we proposed change to be “provide”, in additional, this sentence is not fluent at grammar.
1
2
cosmetics2030248_makarova
0
Second Round of Evaluation Round 2: and Author Response
null
null
The sentence in line 168 is not fluent at grammar.
1
2
cosmetics2030248_makarova
0
All the experiments shown are necessary and sufficient to support the conclusions.
null
null
At line 189, it dors (does) not have sample named EBL, it needs to be check again.
1
2
cosmetics2030248_makarova
0
Second Round of Evaluation Round 2: and Author Response
null
null
Integration of all the above problems, this post Journal does not provide future applications of phytic acid in cosmetics and its title is mentioned in herbal lotion but the experiment did not use any herb emulsion formulation. For the antioxidant capacity of phytic acid only do the experiment of DPPH that has not more in-depth study. Lot of grammatical errors is found in sentences. So we suggested to big modifications, then returned for review.
1
2
cosmetics2030248_makarova
0
Round 1: and Author Response The article titled “Thermal behavior and free-radical-scavenging activity of phytic acid alone and incorporated in galenic emulsions” is focused on the characterization of phytic acid stability and use in cosmetic formulas.
null
null
From the experimental results that phytic acid will decrease the thermal stability of the emulsion, but at line 220 mention that phytic acid has the effect of lipid peroxidation and therefore can be added as an anti-oxidant in the emulsion. So we recommend authors to describe these two points much clearer.
3
2
cosmetics2030248_makarova
0
The article is well written, and the overall study was well planned and professionally conducted.
null
null
The conclusions reported are very short and poor. More discussion of the presented results is needed.
1
2
cosmetics2030248_makarova
0
The article is well written, and the overall study was well planned and professionally conducted.
null
null
The authors missed to report other authors’ studies which agree or disagree with their findings.
1
2
cosmetics2030248_makarova
0
The article is well written, and the overall study was well planned and professionally conducted.
null
null
What is the output of this study? What are the implications in the use of PA in galenic/cosmetic formulations?
1
2
cosmetics2030248_makarova
0
The article is well written, and the overall study was well planned and professionally conducted.
null
null
What are the suggestions of the authors about the use of PA in Cosmetics based on their results? And what the parameters and the tricks that the formulators should be aware of while using PA in their products?
1
2
cosmetics2030248_makarova
0
The article is well written, and the overall study was well planned and professionally conducted.
null
null
Some errors in the legend of Figure 4, such as EM/PHYT/BHT, EM/PHYT is not presented in Figure 4.
1
2
cosmetics2030248_perova
0
The article is well written, and the overall study was well planned and professionally conducted.
null
null
In Figure 4, the results is represented in three times or signal one or other times. Therefore, you must rewritten the legend of Figure 4.
1
2
cosmetics2030248_perova
0
Second Round of Evaluation Round 2: and Author Response
null
null
We recommend “galenic” can be changed to herbaceous, because galenic is not usually to see for non-professional fields or general cosmetics reader.
1
2
cosmetics2030248_perova
0
Round 1: and Author Response The article titled “Thermal behavior and free-radical-scavenging activity of phytic acid alone and incorporated in galenic emulsions” is focused on the characterization of phytic acid stability and use in cosmetic formulas.
null
null
Less a parenthesis at line 132.
1
2
cosmetics2030248_perova
0
However, I think that the article can be substantially improved if the following points are addressed: (1)
null
null
At line 160, “Figureure” should be “Figure.”
1
2
cosmetics2030248_perova
0
The article is well written, and the overall study was well planned and professionally conducted.
null
null
At line 161 mentioned Tonset DCS, but does not explain what this word mean.
1
2
cosmetics2030248_perova
0
Round 1: and Author Response The article titled “Thermal behavior and free-radical-scavenging activity of phytic acid alone and incorporated in galenic emulsions” is focused on the characterization of phytic acid stability and use in cosmetic formulas.
null
null
In Table II, Tonset DCS is a units of temperature, it should be used comma instead of decimal point.
1
2
cosmetics2030248_perova
0
All the experiments shown are necessary and sufficient to support the conclusions.
null
null
At line 167, “donateis” is typically used to represent donate money, we proposed change to be “provide”, in additional, this sentence is not fluent at grammar.
1
2
cosmetics2030248_perova
0
Second Round of Evaluation Round 2: and Author Response
null
null
The sentence in line 168 is not fluent at grammar.
1
2
cosmetics2030248_perova
0
Round 1: and Author Response The article titled “Thermal behavior and free-radical-scavenging activity of phytic acid alone and incorporated in galenic emulsions” is focused on the characterization of phytic acid stability and use in cosmetic formulas.
null
null
At line 189, it dors (does) not have sample named EBL, it needs to be check again.
1
2
cosmetics2030248_perova
0
The article is well written, and the overall study was well planned and professionally conducted.
null
null
Integration of all the above problems, this post Journal does not provide future applications of phytic acid in cosmetics and its title is mentioned in herbal lotion but the experiment did not use any herb emulsion formulation. For the antioxidant capacity of phytic acid only do the experiment of DPPH that has not more in-depth study. Lot of grammatical errors is found in sentences. So we suggested to big modifications, then returned for review.
1
2
cosmetics2030248_perova
0
All the experiments shown are necessary and sufficient to support the conclusions.
null
null
From the experimental results that phytic acid will decrease the thermal stability of the emulsion, but at line 220 mention that phytic acid has the effect of lipid peroxidation and therefore can be added as an anti-oxidant in the emulsion. So we recommend authors to describe these two points much clearer.
3
2
cosmetics2030248_perova
0
Second Round of Evaluation Round 2: and Author Response
null
null
The conclusions reported are very short and poor. More discussion of the presented results is needed.
1
2
cosmetics2030248_perova
0
Second Round of Evaluation Round 2: and Author Response
null
null
The authors missed to report other authors’ studies which agree or disagree with their findings.
1
2
cosmetics2030248_perova
0
Second Round of Evaluation Round 2: and Author Response
null
null
What is the output of this study? What are the implications in the use of PA in galenic/cosmetic formulations?
1
2
cosmetics2030248_perova
0
Second Round of Evaluation Round 2: and Author Response
null
null
What are the suggestions of the authors about the use of PA in Cosmetics based on their results? And what the parameters and the tricks that the formulators should be aware of while using PA in their products?
1
2
cosmetics2030248_perova
0
While interesting, generally well written and scientifically sound, several suggestions should be considered before further consideration.
null
null
I don’t really doubt the empirical findings of the paper (which I see as support for the hypothesis in Japan and possibly in Korea), but I dislike the approach of spending a lot of space on various, often pointless, tests. There should be one detailed analysis based on adequate tests, and a discussion about the results. After all, government expenditure is a political decision.
1
2
economies3040150_perova
0
References: Cameron A. Shelton (2007) “The size and composition of government expenditure” Journal of Public Economics, 91 (11–12) Simon Johnson, William Larson, Chris Papageorgiou, Arvind Subramanian.
null
null
An import question is why are the series for real GDP per capita are taken from PWT 7.0? These series are constructed to be used in cross-country studies, and they are not suitable for the analyses in the paper. See the paper by Johnson et al. (2009). This is a major flaw of the paper and the choice should be defended by showing that using the ‘standard’ real GDP series’ would give the same results. Or the GDP series, downloaded from World Development Indicators (local currency, constant prices), should be used.
1
2
economies3040150_perova
0
The suggestions are listed below in no particular order of importance: 1.
null
null
The dependency ratio has not been included mechanically in most papers, as it is this one. It is supposed to pick up changes in demand for government expenditure, such as schooling and pensions. The general idea is that these have increased government expenditure, both because per-capita schooling and pensions have expanded and because the dependency ratio has increased. In most of the countries studied, as is well-known, the dependency ratio declined during the period studied, while expenditure per person probably increased. Japan is most likely an exception; it should have entered the demographic transition much earlier than the other countries. There is thus no a priory no reason to expect the dependency ratio to play an important role in the Wagner hypothesis in general. It can thus be removed from the analysis, or moved to a footnote. If the author(s) wish to pursue the approach of testing other potentially relevant variables, see Shelton 2007.
1
2
economies3040150_perova
0
More generally, we venture the highly subjective view that despite the immense mathematical sophistication of cointegration tests and their application in perhaps thousands of studies, it is not obvious how much additional substantive insight has been gained in the wide variety of contexts in which these tests have been used.”
null
null
Figure 1 tends to hide co-movements between the variables by mixing of scales. I suggest the graphs are re-done using two y-axes and preferably logs.
1
2
economies3040150_perova
0
Round 2: My recommendation is to accept the paper for publication.
null
null
In Table 5 we can get information about cointegration from the R2 and the t-values. Only Japan shows any promise, in all other cases R2 are very low. I would say they are suspiciously low for time series data. Are thy correct?
1
2
economies3040150_perova
0
While interesting, generally well written and scientifically sound, several suggestions should be considered before further consideration.
null
null
Gregory–Hansen is used when one fails to find cointegration with standard tests. There is no point in testing countries such as Japan and Korea, when a superior test shows that they are cointegrated.
1
2
economies3040150_perova
0
Unit roots and the demand for cigarettes in Turkey: pitfalls and possibilities.
null
null
The use of the MTAR model is dubious because of the small sample, and it should not be used when cointegration has been established. It is unlikely that there is enough information in the data to capture asymmetric effects and the standard procedure is to use MTAR when Engle-Granger fails to show cointegration.
1
2
economies3040150_perova
0
The suggestions are listed below in no particular order of importance: 1.
null
null
What is the alternative hypothesis of the Pedroni test, that there is cointegration in any country or or in all countries? This should be made clear.
1
2
economies3040150_perova
0
Round 2: Author Response to Reviewer 2 Thank you.
null
null
The authors provide a very provocative conclusion (see below), but it is not supported by the analyses in the paper. The single-country analysis would provide the same results if done carefully, and the panel data analyses are dubious both because of the small cross-section (six) and the heterogeneity of the sample. I don’t mind the use panel analyses they can be presented for illustrative purposes, noting the heterogeneity. However, the time series analyses should be done correctly. Moreover, it is quite obvious that in simple bivariate cases, graphs can be very informative. However, the author(s) do not manage to provide any useful information about the dependency ratio in the ‘old fashioned’ analyses; they do only in Table 5 when (unknowingly) testing for cointegrating using OLS.
1
2
economies3040150_perova
0
Round 2: My recommendation is to accept the paper for publication.
null
null
Despite Biehl’s (1998) insightful essay, almost all empirical research on the topic has interpreted the Wagnerian proposition As Ram (1998, Pp. 149-150) has explained, considerations of “nonstationarity” of the variables or “spuriousness” of the correlations or regression do not have much bearing on such tests.
1
2
economies3040150_perova
0
While interesting, generally well written and scientifically sound, several suggestions should be considered before further consideration.
null
null
The x-axes in Figure 1 should have years.
3
2
economies3040150_perova
0
Second Round of Evaluation Round 2: The paper is much better and I only have some minor comments.
null
null
List of references is scant and limited. It is necessary to add more recent works on the subject with alternative ways of testing for Wagner’s Law. Suggestions include “Testing the Validity of Wagner’s Law in Bolivia: A Cointegration and Causality Analysis with Disaggregated Data” by A. Bojanic (2013); “Wagner’s Law and Italian Disaggregated Public Spending: Some Empirical Evidences” by C. Magazzino (2010); and “Panel Data, Cointegration, Causality and Wagner’s Law: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Provinces” by Narayan, P.K., et al. (2008).
1
2
economies3040150_perova
0
References: Cameron A. Shelton (2007) “The size and composition of government expenditure” Journal of Public Economics, 91 (11–12) Simon Johnson, William Larson, Chris Papageorgiou, Arvind Subramanian.
null
null
The paper only lists one way of testing for Wagner’s hypothesis (i.e., analyzing the relation between the share on GDP of government spending and real GDP per capita) when in fact there are many ways of looking at the hypothesis. The authors should include at least a couple of recent ways of testing this law, in addition to the traditional way of testing for it.
1
2
economies3040150_perova
0
Moreover, most studies that add variables to the models, such as the dependency ratio, argue that Wagner’s law holds conditional on it.
null
null
The variables used do not have the same units, which may clog the analysis of the paper. Specifically, real GDP per capita is measured in 2005 dollars while the share of government consumption on GDP is measured in current prices. Either both should be in real terms or both in current prices, but not as is currently the case.
1
2
economies3040150_perova
0
Unit roots and the demand for cigarettes in Turkey: pitfalls and possibilities.
null
null
The descriptive stats in Table 2 reflect stats for the whole period? If so, the table should explicitly state this fact.
1
2
economies3040150_perova
0
At any rate, it is not obvious that such sophisticated and complex tests of cointegration provide any useful additional insight regarding the empirical status of the hypothesis.
null
null
Why are there 3 graphs for the Philippines in Figure 1? By the way, if the variables were measured in either current prices or utilizing the same base year, these graphs would likely be quite different (same goes for all statistical analysis, it is likely to vary when the two variables are measured the same way) 6.
1
2
economies3040150_perova
0
Round 1: The paper analyzes the validity of Wagner’s law in six East Asian countries during the period 1960- 2008.
null
null
What is the point of the dependency rate? The authors should expand on the need to add this variable and what exactly is it trying to capture. In the same vein, what do the authors mean by “however, it seems that the fall in young-dependency ratio was greater than the rise in the old-dependency rate” on p. 4?
1
2
economies3040150_perova
0
This makes the unconditional correlations uninteresting.
null
null
In Table 4, delete the “generated by SAS” note.
1
2
economies3040150_perova
0
General comments The authors apply Latent Growth Curve Model (LGCM) approach to characterize the growth path of China’s agricultural labor productivity between 2000 and 2010 using a balanced panel data.
null
null
Data issue: The authors indicate their data source as “…an index of panel data on agricultural output and employment in the first sector of 287 prefectures from 2000 to 2010 is collected from the China city Statistical Yearbook (2001-2011)...” It is not clear what kind of index the authors are referring to. Are the annual agricultural output data are measured in their nominal value (at current price) or in real value (at constant price)? If it’s based on the real value then what kind of deflators are used in the estimation, national level or regional level since agricultural prices may vary across regions? Labor productivity needs to be measured using real value of agricultural output. Otherwise, it may reflect the changes in prices instead of productivity. This issue needs to be properly addressed.
1
2
economies4030013_makarova
0
Otherwise, it may reflect the changes in prices instead of productivity.
null
null
Measurement issue: The authors rely on the Latent Growth Curve Modeling technique to study the trend growth of China’s agricultural labor productivity. It is not clear, however, why the authors rely on a dataset with only 10-year period to discuss labor productivity trend growth issue instead of using a dataset with longer time period if data is available. In addition, the authors may want to justify their approach by briefly discussing the advantage or shortcomings of their method comparing to other approaches in identifying the growth trend of China’s agricultural labor productivity.
1
2
economies4030013_makarova
0
Besides, the authors must define better the data how the agricultural labor productivity was calculated.
null
null
Please be more specific. Appendix Figure A2: The figure presents the chain-linked index of output and input. It is not clear whether the output is measured in real value (at constant price) or nominal value (at current price).
1
2
economies4030013_makarova
0
We would like to thank the Reviewer to recommend us to develop this part.
null
null
One question that it is necessary to correct is the number of figures in the text.
1
2
economies4030013_makarova
0
As a suggestion for this paper or another, having the data of output, labor and land, it is also interesting to analyze the agricultural labor productivity explained by the agricultural land productivity and land-labor ratios.
null
null
Besides, the authors must define better the data how the agricultural labor productivity was calculated. The agricultural output is in current or constant prices? This could have strong implications in one case or another, especially in the first case. The context of this paper consists in growing agricultural prices, especially in the second half of this decade in the world panorama. So, if the agricultural output is in current prices, the growing prices will affect deeply the results. It must be clearer.
1
2
economies4030013_makarova
0
The authors may want to have some brief discussion on more recent literature regarding China’s productivity estimates and policy related issues.
null
null
On the other hand, in the same line of text (pg. 4 line 3), the authors define the denominator of the agricultural labor productivity as the employed labors in the first sector. What does this first sector mean? Is it a synonymous of agricultural sector? If this “first sector” includes the fish workers, the agricultural labor productivity measures are not correct in the regions with sea access. In this case, it would be the primary sector labor productivity. The authors should also clarify if this sector included the forest products and labor.
1
2
economies4030013_makarova
0
- We would like to thank the reviewer’s scrutiny.
null
null
The introduction is welldone, but it could be improved in some points. I have missed a review of the literature. The measurement of the agricultural labor productivity is an important theme in the literature, not only in the agricultural economics, but also in the economics literature. For example, there are two paper published in two important journals in economics recently that the authors omitted. These papers could be reinforcement about the relevance of this measurement of agricultural productivity: Gollin D, Lagakos D, Waugh ME (2014) Agricultural productivity differences across countries. American Economic Review 104(5):165–170; Gollin D, Lagakos D, Waugh ME (2014) The agricultural productivity gap. Quarterly Journal Economics 129(2): 939–993.
1
2
economies4030013_makarova
0
If this “first sector” includes the fish workers, the agricultural labor productivity measures are not correct in the regions with sea access.
null
null
Other thing to improve the introduction would be writing the main objective of the paper. I think, this clear objective could improve the introduction about the target that the authors follow in this paper. In this version, this is relatively diffuse.
1
2
economies4030013_makarova
0
On the other hand, in the same line of text (pg.
null
null
The authors could enrich the results’ part with reference to the concepts of convergence of Barro and Sala-i-Martin, beta and sigma convergence. The authors wrote about these concepts, for example pg. 6 lines 22-23 and pg. 9 lines 5-6, but they can point out the non existence in the case of Chinese prefectural level.
1
2
economies4030013_makarova
0
It is not clear, however, why the authors rely on a dataset with only 10-year period to discuss labor productivity trend growth issue instead of using a dataset with longer time period if data is available.
null
null
Maybe, the footnote 5 could go to the table 2’s note.
1
2
economies4030013_makarova
0
On the other hand, in the same line of text (pg.
null
null
One of the most interesting issues of the paper is the political change in 2004. Perhaps, more detailed reasons of the reform would enrich the causes to promote it. Besides, the implications of this political reform are explained in the text, but more detail in these explanations would permit to understand better these changes.
1
2
economies4030013_makarova
0
In the map of agricultural labor growth in Chinese region, the legend must include which is considered a high growth, medium and low growth of this variable.
null
null
As a suggestion for this paper or another, having the data of output, labor and land, it is also interesting to analyze the agricultural labor productivity explained by the agricultural land productivity and land-labor ratios. Maybe, some simple correlations between the growths of agricultural labor productivity vs land productivity and land-labor ratio could enrich this or future analysis.
1
2
economies4030013_makarova
0
Thanks to his/her remarks, the paper has improved under many important aspects.
null
null
Data issue: The authors indicate their data source as “…an index of panel data on agricultural output and employment in the first sector of 287 prefectures from 2000 to 2010 is collected from the China city Statistical Yearbook (2001-2011)...” It is not clear what kind of index the authors are referring to. Are the annual agricultural output data are measured in their nominal value (at current price) or in real value (at constant price)? If it’s based on the real value then what kind of deflators are used in the estimation, national level or regional level since agricultural prices may vary across regions? Labor productivity needs to be measured using real value of agricultural output. Otherwise, it may reflect the changes in prices instead of productivity. This issue needs to be properly addressed.
1
2
economies4030013_perova
0
The context of this paper consists in growing agricultural prices, especially in the second half of this decade in the world panorama.
null
null
Measurement issue: The authors rely on the Latent Growth Curve Modeling technique to study the trend growth of China’s agricultural labor productivity. It is not clear, however, why the authors rely on a dataset with only 10-year period to discuss labor productivity trend growth issue instead of using a dataset with longer time period if data is available. In addition, the authors may want to justify their approach by briefly discussing the advantage or shortcomings of their method comparing to other approaches in identifying the growth trend of China’s agricultural labor productivity.
1
2
economies4030013_perova
0
The authors could enrich the results’ part with reference to the concepts of convergence of Barro and Sala-i-Martin, beta and sigma convergence.
null
null
Please be more specific. Appendix Figure A2: The figure presents the chain-linked index of output and input. It is not clear whether the output is measured in real value (at constant price) or nominal value (at current price).
1
2
economies4030013_perova
0
Issues to improve the paper: The introduction is welldone, but it could be improved in some points.
null
null
One question that it is necessary to correct is the number of figures in the text.
1
2
economies4030013_perova
0
On the other hand, in the same line of text (pg.
null
null
Besides, the authors must define better the data how the agricultural labor productivity was calculated. The agricultural output is in current or constant prices? This could have strong implications in one case or another, especially in the first case. The context of this paper consists in growing agricultural prices, especially in the second half of this decade in the world panorama. So, if the agricultural output is in current prices, the growing prices will affect deeply the results. It must be clearer.
1
2
economies4030013_perova
0
Figure 3: It is not clear what the axis labels represent in figure 3.
null
null
On the other hand, in the same line of text (pg. 4 line 3), the authors define the denominator of the agricultural labor productivity as the employed labors in the first sector. What does this first sector mean? Is it a synonymous of agricultural sector? If this “first sector” includes the fish workers, the agricultural labor productivity measures are not correct in the regions with sea access. In this case, it would be the primary sector labor productivity. The authors should also clarify if this sector included the forest products and labor.
1
2
economies4030013_perova
0
It is correct to be published and the authors have made a strong effort to consider my comments and suggestions.
null
null
The introduction is welldone, but it could be improved in some points. I have missed a review of the literature. The measurement of the agricultural labor productivity is an important theme in the literature, not only in the agricultural economics, but also in the economics literature. For example, there are two paper published in two important journals in economics recently that the authors omitted. These papers could be reinforcement about the relevance of this measurement of agricultural productivity: Gollin D, Lagakos D, Waugh ME (2014) Agricultural productivity differences across countries. American Economic Review 104(5):165–170; Gollin D, Lagakos D, Waugh ME (2014) The agricultural productivity gap. Quarterly Journal Economics 129(2): 939–993.
1
2
economies4030013_perova
0
Labor productivity needs to be measured using real value of agricultural output.
null
null
Other thing to improve the introduction would be writing the main objective of the paper. I think, this clear objective could improve the introduction about the target that the authors follow in this paper. In this version, this is relatively diffuse.
1
2
economies4030013_perova
0
If this “first sector” includes the fish workers, the agricultural labor productivity measures are not correct in the regions with sea access.
null
null
The authors could enrich the results’ part with reference to the concepts of convergence of Barro and Sala-i-Martin, beta and sigma convergence. The authors wrote about these concepts, for example pg. 6 lines 22-23 and pg. 9 lines 5-6, but they can point out the non existence in the case of Chinese prefectural level.
1
2
economies4030013_perova
0
In the map of agricultural labor growth in Chinese region, the legend must include which is considered a high growth, medium and low growth of this variable.
null
null
Maybe, the footnote 5 could go to the table 2’s note.
1
2
economies4030013_perova
0
The authors could enrich the results’ part with reference to the concepts of convergence of Barro and Sala-i-Martin, beta and sigma convergence.
null
null
One of the most interesting issues of the paper is the political change in 2004. Perhaps, more detailed reasons of the reform would enrich the causes to promote it. Besides, the implications of this political reform are explained in the text, but more detail in these explanations would permit to understand better these changes.
1
2
economies4030013_perova
0
- We would like to thank the reviewer’s scrutiny.
null
null
As a suggestion for this paper or another, having the data of output, labor and land, it is also interesting to analyze the agricultural labor productivity explained by the agricultural land productivity and land-labor ratios. Maybe, some simple correlations between the growths of agricultural labor productivity vs land productivity and land-labor ratio could enrich this or future analysis.
1
2
economies4030013_perova
0
Author Response Please find the attached file.
null
null
Please add information on the number of additions for different transform types and sizes in original and proposed variants.
1
2
electronics11050760_makarova
0
158075-158084, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2950388.
null
null
It is better that they replace them with other keywords to increase the reach of the manuscript. Keywords : We suggest that the authors should replace keywords such as “video coding” and “transform” because these keywords are already found in the article title.
1
2
electronics11050760_makarova
0
The names of the researchers must follow the style of the journal format.
null
null
Introduction: The authors should add the main contribution s briefly at the end of the introduction.
1
2
electronics11050760_makarova
0
The double quotation should be omitted from the research titles in the list of references.
null
null
Methodology Section: It should be structured, sub-headings should be added to facilitate tracking and understanding.
1
2
electronics11050760_makarova
0
<Reviewer 1> “The manuscript is well written, well organized, and clear.
null
null
There is a lot of recent research out there that can be used for comparison. As this discussion and comparison can clarify the fairness and rationality of the results of the proposed method.
1
2
electronics11050760_makarova
0
Also, they should clarify the limitations of the proposed method.
null
null
Conclusions: Future directions should be added to the conclusion section.
1
2
electronics11050760_makarova
0
There is a lot of recent research out there that can be used for comparison.
null
null
The names of the researchers must follow the style of the journal format.
1
2
electronics11050760_makarova
0
There is a lot of recent research out there that can be used for comparison.
null
null
Some links do not work in the reference list like [22] … etc.
1
2
electronics11050760_makarova
0
It can be easily computed by Equation (14) that the number of additions of the proposed method is smaller for all block sizes than those in VTM-8.2.”
null
null
This article requires extensive proofreading. Authors should check the entire article to remove all extensive mistakes (grammatical and typos) and to improve English writing quality.
1
2
electronics11050760_makarova
0
• Figures and Tables: All figures and tables are shown before they are used in the text.
null
null
The authors should add the main contributions briefly at the end of the introduction. Introduction Section: This comment still requires a response.
3
2
electronics11050760_makarova
0
Zhang, Z.; Zhao, X.; Li, X.; Li, L.; Luo, Y.; Liu, S.; Li, Z.
null
null
The authors should add a section where they discuss comparing their results with those of existing research. Also, they should clarify the limitations of the proposed method. Discussion Section: The authors did not respond accurately to this comment.
3
2
electronics11050760_makarova
0
Zhao, X.; Chen, J.; Karczewicz, M.; Said, A.; Seregin, V. Joint Separable and Non-Separable Transforms for Next-Generation Video Coding, In IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2018, vol.
null
null
Figures and Tables: All figures and tables are shown before they are used in the text.
3
2
electronics11050760_makarova
0
Inverse Transform Using Linearity Hyeonju Song*, and Yung-Lyul Lee* *Digital Media System Laboratory, Department of Computer Engineering, Sejong University, Seoul, Korea.
null
null
Additions also affect complexity. Please add information on the number of additions for different transform types and sizes in original and proposed variants.
1
2
electronics11050760_perova
0
The authors should add the main contributions briefly at the end of the introduction.
null
null
Keywords: We suggest that the authors should replace keywords such as “video coding” and “transform” because these keywords are already found in the article title. It is better that they replace them with other keywords to increase the reach of the manuscript.
1
2
electronics11050760_perova
0
IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2022, vol. 24, pp. 400-414, doi: 10.1109/TMM.2021.3052348.
null
null
Introduction Section:
1
2
electronics11050760_perova
0
Koo, M.; Salehifar, M.; Lim, J.; Kim, S.-H. Low Frequency Non-Separable Transform (LFNST), 2019 Picture Coding Symposium (PCS), 2019, pp. 1-5, doi: 10.1109/PCS48520.2019.8954507.
null
null
Methodology Section: It should be structured, sub-headings should be added to facilitate tracking and understanding.
1
2
electronics11050760_perova
0
• Introduction Section: This comment still requires a response.
null
null
Discussion Section: There is a lot of recent research out there that can be used for comparison. As this discussion and comparison can clarify the fairness and rationality of the results of the proposed method.
1
2
electronics11050760_perova
0
Comment) Conclusions: Future directions should be added to the Conclusion Section.
null
null
Conclusions: Future directions should be added to the conclusion section.
1
2
electronics11050760_perova
0
In answer to the specific comments: Comment) Keywords : We suggest that the authors should replace keywords such as “video coding” and “transform” because these keywords are already found in the article title.
null
null
References List: The list of references is recent, and all references are related to the research topic but it is not sufficient for this study. The names of the researchers must follow the style of the journal format. The double quotation should be omitted from the research titles in the list of references. Some search names in the reference list begin an uppercase letter for each word (such as [4], [5] ... etc.) and others use only an uppercase letter in the first word (such as [2], [9] … etc. ), authors should standardize style. All journal names should be italic. Some references do not contain enough information such as [16], [18] … etc. Some links do not work in the reference list like [22] … etc. The list of references requires an extensive check.
1
2
electronics11050760_perova
0
As this discussion and comparison can clarify the fairness and rationality of the results of the proposed method.
null
null
The authors should add the main contributions briefly at the end of the introduction. Introduction Section: This comment still requires a response.
3
2
electronics11050760_perova
0
The authors should add a section where they discuss comparing their results with those of existing research.
null
null
The authors should add a section where they discuss comparing their results with those of existing research. Also, they should clarify the limitations of the proposed method. Discussion Section: The authors did not respond accurately to this comment.
3
2
electronics11050760_perova
0
In Proceedings of the 14th Meeting Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, Geneva, Swiss, 19-27 March 2019; 19.
null
null
Figures and Tables: All figures and tables are shown before they are used in the text.
3
2
electronics11050760_perova
0
The appliances are prioritized based on their need and demand to achieve optimum energy utilization.
null
null
In the proposed system solar PV, wind generator and battery are the main generating system. As the proposed system is in isolated mode, how continuity of power supply be maintained?
1
2
en15031006_perova
0
Simulation results are presented to show the effectiveness of the proposed method.
null
null
The quality of the figures needs to be improved.
1
2
en15031006_perova
0
The appliances are prioritized based on their need and demand to achieve optimum energy utilization.
null
null
Equations 4, 9, and 12 include some corrections and need to be modified.
1
2
en15031006_perova
0
Point 2: In the proposed system solar PV, wind generator and battery are the main generating system.
null
null
It could be better to include base load ratings in the results section (Fig: 10)
1
2
en15031006_perova
0
The appliances are prioritized based on their need and demand to achieve optimum energy utilization.
null
null
Sizing of renewable energy sources and battery systems were not properly explored.
1
2
en15031006_perova
0
Point 4: A comprehensive deeper literature review is necessary to address the research issue, Also authors need to provide a literature survey in an organized way.
null
null
Please discuss how consumers’ comfortability is marinated in the proposed method.
1
2
en15031006_perova
0
Point 6: Sizing of renewable energy sources and battery systems were not properly explored.
null
null
Authors should avoid using the Subjective pronoun “ we” in academic works.
1
2
en15031006_perova
0
Point 5: All the figures need to be improved.
null
null
In such a study an experimental case must be presented in a specified region.
1
2
en15031006_perova
0
Simulation results are presented to show the effectiveness of the proposed method.
null
null
The authors should carefully distinguish the new contributions of their work from the new existing studies.for example: DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2020.101221
1
2
en15031006_perova
0
Our objective is to schedule and shift the controllable appliances by estimating hourly power generation and considering consumer demand as a variable function.
null
null
A comprehensive deeper literature review is necessary to address the research issue. Also, authors need to provide a literature survey in an organized way.-
1
2
en15031006_perova
0