post_id
stringlengths
5
7
domain
stringclasses
69 values
upvote_ratio
float64
0.5
1
history
stringlengths
11
39.7k
c_root_id_A
stringlengths
7
7
c_root_id_B
stringlengths
7
7
created_at_utc_A
int64
1.27B
1.68B
created_at_utc_B
int64
1.27B
1.68B
score_A
int64
-644
43.5k
score_B
int64
-2,846
43.5k
human_ref_A
stringlengths
0
18k
human_ref_B
stringlengths
0
13.6k
labels
int64
0
1
seconds_difference
float64
0
346M
score_ratio
float64
-2,292
2.5M
metadata_A
stringclasses
1 value
metadata_B
stringclasses
1 value
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i090a3d
i08kxu6
1,647,012,485
1,647,005,611
3
1
If you live in the right climate, you can build in solid brick. http://hopeforarchitecture.com/buildings/closer/look-1
Low co2 concrete and regional stone.
1
6,874
3
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08mjgc
i090a3d
1,647,006,410
1,647,012,485
1
3
Log Cabin if it need be small. Timber frame if med size. But if you purchase an existing masonry house, it will be eco friendly as the making of the brick or harvesting the stone has been done, as well as the mortar. Yes you will prob need to do a restoration, but if you follow the original, that will last and the new eco foot print will be less than anything new.
If you live in the right climate, you can build in solid brick. http://hopeforarchitecture.com/buildings/closer/look-1
0
6,075
3
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i090a3d
i08pv3v
1,647,012,485
1,647,007,999
3
1
If you live in the right climate, you can build in solid brick. http://hopeforarchitecture.com/buildings/closer/look-1
Build it out of reinforced concrete - if done correctly, it will last centuries
1
4,486
3
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08eqsf
i08wljl
1,647,002,194
1,647,010,960
1
2
The most eco-friendly building you can build is no building at all. The carbon embodied in new materials is simply going to entail more emissions than any existing home. So, if you are going to build a new home, understand its not the best eco-friendly option. By all means, build a house if you want to build a house, but understand the complete picture.... I say this as someone who is in the process of building a house. If you want to build a house with minimal impact on the environment, you should look for local materials. You could do a locally sourced timber framed straw bale home with a permanent wood foundation, recycled metal roof. It should be small and efficient. Here is a decent article on straw-bale homes: https://www.finehomebuilding.com/2018/10/10/houses-design-case-straw-bale-houses
Hempcrete
0
8,766
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08ewbz
i08wljl
1,647,002,286
1,647,010,960
1
2
Rammed earth walls
Hempcrete
0
8,674
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08wljl
i08jmv3
1,647,010,960
1,647,004,926
2
1
Hempcrete
I would go something with steel structure. So I can swap elements. Maybe expand in 50 years. Thick walls with minimal openings exept for the northfacade for minimising heating and cooling expenses. Making roof out of solar panels are always an option or adding wind turbines might. Going gray on paint might be logical for wear and tear. We dont do any timber construction in Turkey so I defaulted to steel.
1
6,034
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08wljl
i08b4sf
1,647,010,960
1,646,999,877
2
0
Hempcrete
Clay and bamboos
1
11,083
2,000
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08wljl
i08bxua
1,647,010,960
1,647,000,428
2
0
Hempcrete
Post and beam. Pine or oak frame. Cedar siding.
1
10,532
2,000
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08wljl
i08cjvf
1,647,010,960
1,647,000,831
2
1
Hempcrete
I’d say stone but it would have to be done with stone blocks that form ‘butter’ joints with minimal mortar required, bc the mortar won’t last long before it needs repointing.
1
10,129
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08wljl
i08ie0o
1,647,010,960
1,647,004,264
2
1
Hempcrete
You can visit the articles at https://www.ecohome.net/ . They are "a team of engineers, environmentalists and former home builders committed to providing homeowners and builders with essential information to create more sustainable, durable and healthier homes." They cover everything from insulation to flooring to exterior materials. It's based in Québec so it might not be entirely relevant to you depending on your location but it can give you a lot of good staring points.
1
6,696
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08wljl
i08kfu7
1,647,010,960
1,647,005,349
2
1
Hempcrete
There is so many ways to look at building sustainably. It will take a lot of research for where and what. Most sustainable is to reuse as much of an existing building as possible. All buildings will require some level of maintenance and repair over time but certain materials will require less frequency of repairs. Key to longevity is annual maintenance and care. Over time, technology of materials and products improve. For example, a 100 year building may have great bones but it’ll have windows that are single pane and drafty, but replacement is warranted for better insulated windows for energy savings in heating the building. So 50 Years from today, there could be a product that is going to improve your building so greatly that you’ll want to replace or retrofit it even if not broken because it will benefit the environment in some way.
1
5,611
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08kqfb
i08wljl
1,647,005,504
1,647,010,960
1
2
I'd go Compressed Earth Bricks - eco friendly, long-lasting, fire-resistant, some of the best insulation.
Hempcrete
0
5,456
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08wljl
i08kxu6
1,647,010,960
1,647,005,611
2
1
Hempcrete
Low co2 concrete and regional stone.
1
5,349
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08mjgc
i08wljl
1,647,006,410
1,647,010,960
1
2
Log Cabin if it need be small. Timber frame if med size. But if you purchase an existing masonry house, it will be eco friendly as the making of the brick or harvesting the stone has been done, as well as the mortar. Yes you will prob need to do a restoration, but if you follow the original, that will last and the new eco foot print will be less than anything new.
Hempcrete
0
4,550
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08wljl
i08pv3v
1,647,010,960
1,647,007,999
2
1
Hempcrete
Build it out of reinforced concrete - if done correctly, it will last centuries
1
2,961
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08eqsf
i09s88s
1,647,002,194
1,647,023,301
1
2
The most eco-friendly building you can build is no building at all. The carbon embodied in new materials is simply going to entail more emissions than any existing home. So, if you are going to build a new home, understand its not the best eco-friendly option. By all means, build a house if you want to build a house, but understand the complete picture.... I say this as someone who is in the process of building a house. If you want to build a house with minimal impact on the environment, you should look for local materials. You could do a locally sourced timber framed straw bale home with a permanent wood foundation, recycled metal roof. It should be small and efficient. Here is a decent article on straw-bale homes: https://www.finehomebuilding.com/2018/10/10/houses-design-case-straw-bale-houses
Some new building materials to consider are anything made out of hemp. They have hemp building blocks that are net carbon zero and actually filter as they support a home. Concrete and cement or actually pretty good means of building materials and with three-dimensional printing you can build a very good home that way as well. In architectural engineering too, there’s actually different degrees and dimensions a house can be built in order to maximise both sunlight exposure in airflow through the seasons. The most efficient style house to build is a one floor home with a cellar or basement ideally not in a valley or near a flood plain but close to fresh ground water and fertile soil. The more land you have the better too and that land should also have some mature growth forests or timberland so fire fuel source and the maintain soil enrichment. Trees also create shelter for a diverse ecosystem and help prevent wind tunnels that cause tornadoes and wind storms. They also keep lightening away from any man made structures too. A good gateway into understanding economy building that can for ages look into the style of the Shinto Buddhists temples in Japan and the aforementioned building materials. You’ll find a lot of resources. Good luck!
0
21,107
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08ewbz
i09s88s
1,647,002,286
1,647,023,301
1
2
Rammed earth walls
Some new building materials to consider are anything made out of hemp. They have hemp building blocks that are net carbon zero and actually filter as they support a home. Concrete and cement or actually pretty good means of building materials and with three-dimensional printing you can build a very good home that way as well. In architectural engineering too, there’s actually different degrees and dimensions a house can be built in order to maximise both sunlight exposure in airflow through the seasons. The most efficient style house to build is a one floor home with a cellar or basement ideally not in a valley or near a flood plain but close to fresh ground water and fertile soil. The more land you have the better too and that land should also have some mature growth forests or timberland so fire fuel source and the maintain soil enrichment. Trees also create shelter for a diverse ecosystem and help prevent wind tunnels that cause tornadoes and wind storms. They also keep lightening away from any man made structures too. A good gateway into understanding economy building that can for ages look into the style of the Shinto Buddhists temples in Japan and the aforementioned building materials. You’ll find a lot of resources. Good luck!
0
21,015
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i09s88s
i08jmv3
1,647,023,301
1,647,004,926
2
1
Some new building materials to consider are anything made out of hemp. They have hemp building blocks that are net carbon zero and actually filter as they support a home. Concrete and cement or actually pretty good means of building materials and with three-dimensional printing you can build a very good home that way as well. In architectural engineering too, there’s actually different degrees and dimensions a house can be built in order to maximise both sunlight exposure in airflow through the seasons. The most efficient style house to build is a one floor home with a cellar or basement ideally not in a valley or near a flood plain but close to fresh ground water and fertile soil. The more land you have the better too and that land should also have some mature growth forests or timberland so fire fuel source and the maintain soil enrichment. Trees also create shelter for a diverse ecosystem and help prevent wind tunnels that cause tornadoes and wind storms. They also keep lightening away from any man made structures too. A good gateway into understanding economy building that can for ages look into the style of the Shinto Buddhists temples in Japan and the aforementioned building materials. You’ll find a lot of resources. Good luck!
I would go something with steel structure. So I can swap elements. Maybe expand in 50 years. Thick walls with minimal openings exept for the northfacade for minimising heating and cooling expenses. Making roof out of solar panels are always an option or adding wind turbines might. Going gray on paint might be logical for wear and tear. We dont do any timber construction in Turkey so I defaulted to steel.
1
18,375
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i09s88s
i08b4sf
1,647,023,301
1,646,999,877
2
0
Some new building materials to consider are anything made out of hemp. They have hemp building blocks that are net carbon zero and actually filter as they support a home. Concrete and cement or actually pretty good means of building materials and with three-dimensional printing you can build a very good home that way as well. In architectural engineering too, there’s actually different degrees and dimensions a house can be built in order to maximise both sunlight exposure in airflow through the seasons. The most efficient style house to build is a one floor home with a cellar or basement ideally not in a valley or near a flood plain but close to fresh ground water and fertile soil. The more land you have the better too and that land should also have some mature growth forests or timberland so fire fuel source and the maintain soil enrichment. Trees also create shelter for a diverse ecosystem and help prevent wind tunnels that cause tornadoes and wind storms. They also keep lightening away from any man made structures too. A good gateway into understanding economy building that can for ages look into the style of the Shinto Buddhists temples in Japan and the aforementioned building materials. You’ll find a lot of resources. Good luck!
Clay and bamboos
1
23,424
2,000
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i09s88s
i08bxua
1,647,023,301
1,647,000,428
2
0
Some new building materials to consider are anything made out of hemp. They have hemp building blocks that are net carbon zero and actually filter as they support a home. Concrete and cement or actually pretty good means of building materials and with three-dimensional printing you can build a very good home that way as well. In architectural engineering too, there’s actually different degrees and dimensions a house can be built in order to maximise both sunlight exposure in airflow through the seasons. The most efficient style house to build is a one floor home with a cellar or basement ideally not in a valley or near a flood plain but close to fresh ground water and fertile soil. The more land you have the better too and that land should also have some mature growth forests or timberland so fire fuel source and the maintain soil enrichment. Trees also create shelter for a diverse ecosystem and help prevent wind tunnels that cause tornadoes and wind storms. They also keep lightening away from any man made structures too. A good gateway into understanding economy building that can for ages look into the style of the Shinto Buddhists temples in Japan and the aforementioned building materials. You’ll find a lot of resources. Good luck!
Post and beam. Pine or oak frame. Cedar siding.
1
22,873
2,000
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08cjvf
i09s88s
1,647,000,831
1,647,023,301
1
2
I’d say stone but it would have to be done with stone blocks that form ‘butter’ joints with minimal mortar required, bc the mortar won’t last long before it needs repointing.
Some new building materials to consider are anything made out of hemp. They have hemp building blocks that are net carbon zero and actually filter as they support a home. Concrete and cement or actually pretty good means of building materials and with three-dimensional printing you can build a very good home that way as well. In architectural engineering too, there’s actually different degrees and dimensions a house can be built in order to maximise both sunlight exposure in airflow through the seasons. The most efficient style house to build is a one floor home with a cellar or basement ideally not in a valley or near a flood plain but close to fresh ground water and fertile soil. The more land you have the better too and that land should also have some mature growth forests or timberland so fire fuel source and the maintain soil enrichment. Trees also create shelter for a diverse ecosystem and help prevent wind tunnels that cause tornadoes and wind storms. They also keep lightening away from any man made structures too. A good gateway into understanding economy building that can for ages look into the style of the Shinto Buddhists temples in Japan and the aforementioned building materials. You’ll find a lot of resources. Good luck!
0
22,470
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i09s88s
i08ie0o
1,647,023,301
1,647,004,264
2
1
Some new building materials to consider are anything made out of hemp. They have hemp building blocks that are net carbon zero and actually filter as they support a home. Concrete and cement or actually pretty good means of building materials and with three-dimensional printing you can build a very good home that way as well. In architectural engineering too, there’s actually different degrees and dimensions a house can be built in order to maximise both sunlight exposure in airflow through the seasons. The most efficient style house to build is a one floor home with a cellar or basement ideally not in a valley or near a flood plain but close to fresh ground water and fertile soil. The more land you have the better too and that land should also have some mature growth forests or timberland so fire fuel source and the maintain soil enrichment. Trees also create shelter for a diverse ecosystem and help prevent wind tunnels that cause tornadoes and wind storms. They also keep lightening away from any man made structures too. A good gateway into understanding economy building that can for ages look into the style of the Shinto Buddhists temples in Japan and the aforementioned building materials. You’ll find a lot of resources. Good luck!
You can visit the articles at https://www.ecohome.net/ . They are "a team of engineers, environmentalists and former home builders committed to providing homeowners and builders with essential information to create more sustainable, durable and healthier homes." They cover everything from insulation to flooring to exterior materials. It's based in Québec so it might not be entirely relevant to you depending on your location but it can give you a lot of good staring points.
1
19,037
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08kfu7
i09s88s
1,647,005,349
1,647,023,301
1
2
There is so many ways to look at building sustainably. It will take a lot of research for where and what. Most sustainable is to reuse as much of an existing building as possible. All buildings will require some level of maintenance and repair over time but certain materials will require less frequency of repairs. Key to longevity is annual maintenance and care. Over time, technology of materials and products improve. For example, a 100 year building may have great bones but it’ll have windows that are single pane and drafty, but replacement is warranted for better insulated windows for energy savings in heating the building. So 50 Years from today, there could be a product that is going to improve your building so greatly that you’ll want to replace or retrofit it even if not broken because it will benefit the environment in some way.
Some new building materials to consider are anything made out of hemp. They have hemp building blocks that are net carbon zero and actually filter as they support a home. Concrete and cement or actually pretty good means of building materials and with three-dimensional printing you can build a very good home that way as well. In architectural engineering too, there’s actually different degrees and dimensions a house can be built in order to maximise both sunlight exposure in airflow through the seasons. The most efficient style house to build is a one floor home with a cellar or basement ideally not in a valley or near a flood plain but close to fresh ground water and fertile soil. The more land you have the better too and that land should also have some mature growth forests or timberland so fire fuel source and the maintain soil enrichment. Trees also create shelter for a diverse ecosystem and help prevent wind tunnels that cause tornadoes and wind storms. They also keep lightening away from any man made structures too. A good gateway into understanding economy building that can for ages look into the style of the Shinto Buddhists temples in Japan and the aforementioned building materials. You’ll find a lot of resources. Good luck!
0
17,952
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i09s88s
i08kqfb
1,647,023,301
1,647,005,504
2
1
Some new building materials to consider are anything made out of hemp. They have hemp building blocks that are net carbon zero and actually filter as they support a home. Concrete and cement or actually pretty good means of building materials and with three-dimensional printing you can build a very good home that way as well. In architectural engineering too, there’s actually different degrees and dimensions a house can be built in order to maximise both sunlight exposure in airflow through the seasons. The most efficient style house to build is a one floor home with a cellar or basement ideally not in a valley or near a flood plain but close to fresh ground water and fertile soil. The more land you have the better too and that land should also have some mature growth forests or timberland so fire fuel source and the maintain soil enrichment. Trees also create shelter for a diverse ecosystem and help prevent wind tunnels that cause tornadoes and wind storms. They also keep lightening away from any man made structures too. A good gateway into understanding economy building that can for ages look into the style of the Shinto Buddhists temples in Japan and the aforementioned building materials. You’ll find a lot of resources. Good luck!
I'd go Compressed Earth Bricks - eco friendly, long-lasting, fire-resistant, some of the best insulation.
1
17,797
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08kxu6
i09s88s
1,647,005,611
1,647,023,301
1
2
Low co2 concrete and regional stone.
Some new building materials to consider are anything made out of hemp. They have hemp building blocks that are net carbon zero and actually filter as they support a home. Concrete and cement or actually pretty good means of building materials and with three-dimensional printing you can build a very good home that way as well. In architectural engineering too, there’s actually different degrees and dimensions a house can be built in order to maximise both sunlight exposure in airflow through the seasons. The most efficient style house to build is a one floor home with a cellar or basement ideally not in a valley or near a flood plain but close to fresh ground water and fertile soil. The more land you have the better too and that land should also have some mature growth forests or timberland so fire fuel source and the maintain soil enrichment. Trees also create shelter for a diverse ecosystem and help prevent wind tunnels that cause tornadoes and wind storms. They also keep lightening away from any man made structures too. A good gateway into understanding economy building that can for ages look into the style of the Shinto Buddhists temples in Japan and the aforementioned building materials. You’ll find a lot of resources. Good luck!
0
17,690
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i09s88s
i08mjgc
1,647,023,301
1,647,006,410
2
1
Some new building materials to consider are anything made out of hemp. They have hemp building blocks that are net carbon zero and actually filter as they support a home. Concrete and cement or actually pretty good means of building materials and with three-dimensional printing you can build a very good home that way as well. In architectural engineering too, there’s actually different degrees and dimensions a house can be built in order to maximise both sunlight exposure in airflow through the seasons. The most efficient style house to build is a one floor home with a cellar or basement ideally not in a valley or near a flood plain but close to fresh ground water and fertile soil. The more land you have the better too and that land should also have some mature growth forests or timberland so fire fuel source and the maintain soil enrichment. Trees also create shelter for a diverse ecosystem and help prevent wind tunnels that cause tornadoes and wind storms. They also keep lightening away from any man made structures too. A good gateway into understanding economy building that can for ages look into the style of the Shinto Buddhists temples in Japan and the aforementioned building materials. You’ll find a lot of resources. Good luck!
Log Cabin if it need be small. Timber frame if med size. But if you purchase an existing masonry house, it will be eco friendly as the making of the brick or harvesting the stone has been done, as well as the mortar. Yes you will prob need to do a restoration, but if you follow the original, that will last and the new eco foot print will be less than anything new.
1
16,891
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08pv3v
i09s88s
1,647,007,999
1,647,023,301
1
2
Build it out of reinforced concrete - if done correctly, it will last centuries
Some new building materials to consider are anything made out of hemp. They have hemp building blocks that are net carbon zero and actually filter as they support a home. Concrete and cement or actually pretty good means of building materials and with three-dimensional printing you can build a very good home that way as well. In architectural engineering too, there’s actually different degrees and dimensions a house can be built in order to maximise both sunlight exposure in airflow through the seasons. The most efficient style house to build is a one floor home with a cellar or basement ideally not in a valley or near a flood plain but close to fresh ground water and fertile soil. The more land you have the better too and that land should also have some mature growth forests or timberland so fire fuel source and the maintain soil enrichment. Trees also create shelter for a diverse ecosystem and help prevent wind tunnels that cause tornadoes and wind storms. They also keep lightening away from any man made structures too. A good gateway into understanding economy building that can for ages look into the style of the Shinto Buddhists temples in Japan and the aforementioned building materials. You’ll find a lot of resources. Good luck!
0
15,302
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i09s88s
i09oerj
1,647,023,301
1,647,021,860
2
1
Some new building materials to consider are anything made out of hemp. They have hemp building blocks that are net carbon zero and actually filter as they support a home. Concrete and cement or actually pretty good means of building materials and with three-dimensional printing you can build a very good home that way as well. In architectural engineering too, there’s actually different degrees and dimensions a house can be built in order to maximise both sunlight exposure in airflow through the seasons. The most efficient style house to build is a one floor home with a cellar or basement ideally not in a valley or near a flood plain but close to fresh ground water and fertile soil. The more land you have the better too and that land should also have some mature growth forests or timberland so fire fuel source and the maintain soil enrichment. Trees also create shelter for a diverse ecosystem and help prevent wind tunnels that cause tornadoes and wind storms. They also keep lightening away from any man made structures too. A good gateway into understanding economy building that can for ages look into the style of the Shinto Buddhists temples in Japan and the aforementioned building materials. You’ll find a lot of resources. Good luck!
Pyramid
1
1,441
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i0aj47m
i08eqsf
1,647,034,059
1,647,002,194
2
1
Good water proofing then just go with whatever is cheapest and looks ok to you over that. Unless you’re a vampire that will last long enough that by the time you sell or remodel it will still be doing ok.
The most eco-friendly building you can build is no building at all. The carbon embodied in new materials is simply going to entail more emissions than any existing home. So, if you are going to build a new home, understand its not the best eco-friendly option. By all means, build a house if you want to build a house, but understand the complete picture.... I say this as someone who is in the process of building a house. If you want to build a house with minimal impact on the environment, you should look for local materials. You could do a locally sourced timber framed straw bale home with a permanent wood foundation, recycled metal roof. It should be small and efficient. Here is a decent article on straw-bale homes: https://www.finehomebuilding.com/2018/10/10/houses-design-case-straw-bale-houses
1
31,865
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08ewbz
i0aj47m
1,647,002,286
1,647,034,059
1
2
Rammed earth walls
Good water proofing then just go with whatever is cheapest and looks ok to you over that. Unless you’re a vampire that will last long enough that by the time you sell or remodel it will still be doing ok.
0
31,773
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08jmv3
i0aj47m
1,647,004,926
1,647,034,059
1
2
I would go something with steel structure. So I can swap elements. Maybe expand in 50 years. Thick walls with minimal openings exept for the northfacade for minimising heating and cooling expenses. Making roof out of solar panels are always an option or adding wind turbines might. Going gray on paint might be logical for wear and tear. We dont do any timber construction in Turkey so I defaulted to steel.
Good water proofing then just go with whatever is cheapest and looks ok to you over that. Unless you’re a vampire that will last long enough that by the time you sell or remodel it will still be doing ok.
0
29,133
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i0aj47m
i08b4sf
1,647,034,059
1,646,999,877
2
0
Good water proofing then just go with whatever is cheapest and looks ok to you over that. Unless you’re a vampire that will last long enough that by the time you sell or remodel it will still be doing ok.
Clay and bamboos
1
34,182
2,000
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i0aj47m
i08bxua
1,647,034,059
1,647,000,428
2
0
Good water proofing then just go with whatever is cheapest and looks ok to you over that. Unless you’re a vampire that will last long enough that by the time you sell or remodel it will still be doing ok.
Post and beam. Pine or oak frame. Cedar siding.
1
33,631
2,000
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i0aj47m
i08cjvf
1,647,034,059
1,647,000,831
2
1
Good water proofing then just go with whatever is cheapest and looks ok to you over that. Unless you’re a vampire that will last long enough that by the time you sell or remodel it will still be doing ok.
I’d say stone but it would have to be done with stone blocks that form ‘butter’ joints with minimal mortar required, bc the mortar won’t last long before it needs repointing.
1
33,228
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i0aj47m
i08ie0o
1,647,034,059
1,647,004,264
2
1
Good water proofing then just go with whatever is cheapest and looks ok to you over that. Unless you’re a vampire that will last long enough that by the time you sell or remodel it will still be doing ok.
You can visit the articles at https://www.ecohome.net/ . They are "a team of engineers, environmentalists and former home builders committed to providing homeowners and builders with essential information to create more sustainable, durable and healthier homes." They cover everything from insulation to flooring to exterior materials. It's based in Québec so it might not be entirely relevant to you depending on your location but it can give you a lot of good staring points.
1
29,795
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08kfu7
i0aj47m
1,647,005,349
1,647,034,059
1
2
There is so many ways to look at building sustainably. It will take a lot of research for where and what. Most sustainable is to reuse as much of an existing building as possible. All buildings will require some level of maintenance and repair over time but certain materials will require less frequency of repairs. Key to longevity is annual maintenance and care. Over time, technology of materials and products improve. For example, a 100 year building may have great bones but it’ll have windows that are single pane and drafty, but replacement is warranted for better insulated windows for energy savings in heating the building. So 50 Years from today, there could be a product that is going to improve your building so greatly that you’ll want to replace or retrofit it even if not broken because it will benefit the environment in some way.
Good water proofing then just go with whatever is cheapest and looks ok to you over that. Unless you’re a vampire that will last long enough that by the time you sell or remodel it will still be doing ok.
0
28,710
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i0aj47m
i08kqfb
1,647,034,059
1,647,005,504
2
1
Good water proofing then just go with whatever is cheapest and looks ok to you over that. Unless you’re a vampire that will last long enough that by the time you sell or remodel it will still be doing ok.
I'd go Compressed Earth Bricks - eco friendly, long-lasting, fire-resistant, some of the best insulation.
1
28,555
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08kxu6
i0aj47m
1,647,005,611
1,647,034,059
1
2
Low co2 concrete and regional stone.
Good water proofing then just go with whatever is cheapest and looks ok to you over that. Unless you’re a vampire that will last long enough that by the time you sell or remodel it will still be doing ok.
0
28,448
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08mjgc
i0aj47m
1,647,006,410
1,647,034,059
1
2
Log Cabin if it need be small. Timber frame if med size. But if you purchase an existing masonry house, it will be eco friendly as the making of the brick or harvesting the stone has been done, as well as the mortar. Yes you will prob need to do a restoration, but if you follow the original, that will last and the new eco foot print will be less than anything new.
Good water proofing then just go with whatever is cheapest and looks ok to you over that. Unless you’re a vampire that will last long enough that by the time you sell or remodel it will still be doing ok.
0
27,649
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08pv3v
i0aj47m
1,647,007,999
1,647,034,059
1
2
Build it out of reinforced concrete - if done correctly, it will last centuries
Good water proofing then just go with whatever is cheapest and looks ok to you over that. Unless you’re a vampire that will last long enough that by the time you sell or remodel it will still be doing ok.
0
26,060
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i0aj47m
i09oerj
1,647,034,059
1,647,021,860
2
1
Good water proofing then just go with whatever is cheapest and looks ok to you over that. Unless you’re a vampire that will last long enough that by the time you sell or remodel it will still be doing ok.
Pyramid
1
12,199
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08eqsf
i0avidm
1,647,002,194
1,647,039,305
1
2
The most eco-friendly building you can build is no building at all. The carbon embodied in new materials is simply going to entail more emissions than any existing home. So, if you are going to build a new home, understand its not the best eco-friendly option. By all means, build a house if you want to build a house, but understand the complete picture.... I say this as someone who is in the process of building a house. If you want to build a house with minimal impact on the environment, you should look for local materials. You could do a locally sourced timber framed straw bale home with a permanent wood foundation, recycled metal roof. It should be small and efficient. Here is a decent article on straw-bale homes: https://www.finehomebuilding.com/2018/10/10/houses-design-case-straw-bale-houses
Good workmanship and the habit of maintaining it well. My house was built in 1999 and till this day it looks like it’s 5 years old. My dad makes sure that everything is maintained and nothing is left unattended even with the house being located in a hot climate for the majority of the year. A thorough research in designing the house and also be on site almost all the time to make sure that no one is cutting corners is important too
0
37,111
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08ewbz
i0avidm
1,647,002,286
1,647,039,305
1
2
Rammed earth walls
Good workmanship and the habit of maintaining it well. My house was built in 1999 and till this day it looks like it’s 5 years old. My dad makes sure that everything is maintained and nothing is left unattended even with the house being located in a hot climate for the majority of the year. A thorough research in designing the house and also be on site almost all the time to make sure that no one is cutting corners is important too
0
37,019
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08jmv3
i0avidm
1,647,004,926
1,647,039,305
1
2
I would go something with steel structure. So I can swap elements. Maybe expand in 50 years. Thick walls with minimal openings exept for the northfacade for minimising heating and cooling expenses. Making roof out of solar panels are always an option or adding wind turbines might. Going gray on paint might be logical for wear and tear. We dont do any timber construction in Turkey so I defaulted to steel.
Good workmanship and the habit of maintaining it well. My house was built in 1999 and till this day it looks like it’s 5 years old. My dad makes sure that everything is maintained and nothing is left unattended even with the house being located in a hot climate for the majority of the year. A thorough research in designing the house and also be on site almost all the time to make sure that no one is cutting corners is important too
0
34,379
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08b4sf
i0avidm
1,646,999,877
1,647,039,305
0
2
Clay and bamboos
Good workmanship and the habit of maintaining it well. My house was built in 1999 and till this day it looks like it’s 5 years old. My dad makes sure that everything is maintained and nothing is left unattended even with the house being located in a hot climate for the majority of the year. A thorough research in designing the house and also be on site almost all the time to make sure that no one is cutting corners is important too
0
39,428
2,000
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i0avidm
i08bxua
1,647,039,305
1,647,000,428
2
0
Good workmanship and the habit of maintaining it well. My house was built in 1999 and till this day it looks like it’s 5 years old. My dad makes sure that everything is maintained and nothing is left unattended even with the house being located in a hot climate for the majority of the year. A thorough research in designing the house and also be on site almost all the time to make sure that no one is cutting corners is important too
Post and beam. Pine or oak frame. Cedar siding.
1
38,877
2,000
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i0avidm
i08cjvf
1,647,039,305
1,647,000,831
2
1
Good workmanship and the habit of maintaining it well. My house was built in 1999 and till this day it looks like it’s 5 years old. My dad makes sure that everything is maintained and nothing is left unattended even with the house being located in a hot climate for the majority of the year. A thorough research in designing the house and also be on site almost all the time to make sure that no one is cutting corners is important too
I’d say stone but it would have to be done with stone blocks that form ‘butter’ joints with minimal mortar required, bc the mortar won’t last long before it needs repointing.
1
38,474
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i0avidm
i08ie0o
1,647,039,305
1,647,004,264
2
1
Good workmanship and the habit of maintaining it well. My house was built in 1999 and till this day it looks like it’s 5 years old. My dad makes sure that everything is maintained and nothing is left unattended even with the house being located in a hot climate for the majority of the year. A thorough research in designing the house and also be on site almost all the time to make sure that no one is cutting corners is important too
You can visit the articles at https://www.ecohome.net/ . They are "a team of engineers, environmentalists and former home builders committed to providing homeowners and builders with essential information to create more sustainable, durable and healthier homes." They cover everything from insulation to flooring to exterior materials. It's based in Québec so it might not be entirely relevant to you depending on your location but it can give you a lot of good staring points.
1
35,041
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i0avidm
i08kfu7
1,647,039,305
1,647,005,349
2
1
Good workmanship and the habit of maintaining it well. My house was built in 1999 and till this day it looks like it’s 5 years old. My dad makes sure that everything is maintained and nothing is left unattended even with the house being located in a hot climate for the majority of the year. A thorough research in designing the house and also be on site almost all the time to make sure that no one is cutting corners is important too
There is so many ways to look at building sustainably. It will take a lot of research for where and what. Most sustainable is to reuse as much of an existing building as possible. All buildings will require some level of maintenance and repair over time but certain materials will require less frequency of repairs. Key to longevity is annual maintenance and care. Over time, technology of materials and products improve. For example, a 100 year building may have great bones but it’ll have windows that are single pane and drafty, but replacement is warranted for better insulated windows for energy savings in heating the building. So 50 Years from today, there could be a product that is going to improve your building so greatly that you’ll want to replace or retrofit it even if not broken because it will benefit the environment in some way.
1
33,956
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i0avidm
i08kqfb
1,647,039,305
1,647,005,504
2
1
Good workmanship and the habit of maintaining it well. My house was built in 1999 and till this day it looks like it’s 5 years old. My dad makes sure that everything is maintained and nothing is left unattended even with the house being located in a hot climate for the majority of the year. A thorough research in designing the house and also be on site almost all the time to make sure that no one is cutting corners is important too
I'd go Compressed Earth Bricks - eco friendly, long-lasting, fire-resistant, some of the best insulation.
1
33,801
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i0avidm
i08kxu6
1,647,039,305
1,647,005,611
2
1
Good workmanship and the habit of maintaining it well. My house was built in 1999 and till this day it looks like it’s 5 years old. My dad makes sure that everything is maintained and nothing is left unattended even with the house being located in a hot climate for the majority of the year. A thorough research in designing the house and also be on site almost all the time to make sure that no one is cutting corners is important too
Low co2 concrete and regional stone.
1
33,694
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08mjgc
i0avidm
1,647,006,410
1,647,039,305
1
2
Log Cabin if it need be small. Timber frame if med size. But if you purchase an existing masonry house, it will be eco friendly as the making of the brick or harvesting the stone has been done, as well as the mortar. Yes you will prob need to do a restoration, but if you follow the original, that will last and the new eco foot print will be less than anything new.
Good workmanship and the habit of maintaining it well. My house was built in 1999 and till this day it looks like it’s 5 years old. My dad makes sure that everything is maintained and nothing is left unattended even with the house being located in a hot climate for the majority of the year. A thorough research in designing the house and also be on site almost all the time to make sure that no one is cutting corners is important too
0
32,895
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08pv3v
i0avidm
1,647,007,999
1,647,039,305
1
2
Build it out of reinforced concrete - if done correctly, it will last centuries
Good workmanship and the habit of maintaining it well. My house was built in 1999 and till this day it looks like it’s 5 years old. My dad makes sure that everything is maintained and nothing is left unattended even with the house being located in a hot climate for the majority of the year. A thorough research in designing the house and also be on site almost all the time to make sure that no one is cutting corners is important too
0
31,306
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i09oerj
i0avidm
1,647,021,860
1,647,039,305
1
2
Pyramid
Good workmanship and the habit of maintaining it well. My house was built in 1999 and till this day it looks like it’s 5 years old. My dad makes sure that everything is maintained and nothing is left unattended even with the house being located in a hot climate for the majority of the year. A thorough research in designing the house and also be on site almost all the time to make sure that no one is cutting corners is important too
0
17,445
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08eqsf
i0beduh
1,647,002,194
1,647,048,282
1
2
The most eco-friendly building you can build is no building at all. The carbon embodied in new materials is simply going to entail more emissions than any existing home. So, if you are going to build a new home, understand its not the best eco-friendly option. By all means, build a house if you want to build a house, but understand the complete picture.... I say this as someone who is in the process of building a house. If you want to build a house with minimal impact on the environment, you should look for local materials. You could do a locally sourced timber framed straw bale home with a permanent wood foundation, recycled metal roof. It should be small and efficient. Here is a decent article on straw-bale homes: https://www.finehomebuilding.com/2018/10/10/houses-design-case-straw-bale-houses
They did that centuries ago. Choose a cave! Not mocking or offending, buy a cave and decorate it. I bet it’d last for centuries. Not sure about feasibility of insulation and other stuff it might be doable.
0
46,088
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08ewbz
i0beduh
1,647,002,286
1,647,048,282
1
2
Rammed earth walls
They did that centuries ago. Choose a cave! Not mocking or offending, buy a cave and decorate it. I bet it’d last for centuries. Not sure about feasibility of insulation and other stuff it might be doable.
0
45,996
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08jmv3
i0beduh
1,647,004,926
1,647,048,282
1
2
I would go something with steel structure. So I can swap elements. Maybe expand in 50 years. Thick walls with minimal openings exept for the northfacade for minimising heating and cooling expenses. Making roof out of solar panels are always an option or adding wind turbines might. Going gray on paint might be logical for wear and tear. We dont do any timber construction in Turkey so I defaulted to steel.
They did that centuries ago. Choose a cave! Not mocking or offending, buy a cave and decorate it. I bet it’d last for centuries. Not sure about feasibility of insulation and other stuff it might be doable.
0
43,356
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08b4sf
i0beduh
1,646,999,877
1,647,048,282
0
2
Clay and bamboos
They did that centuries ago. Choose a cave! Not mocking or offending, buy a cave and decorate it. I bet it’d last for centuries. Not sure about feasibility of insulation and other stuff it might be doable.
0
48,405
2,000
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08bxua
i0beduh
1,647,000,428
1,647,048,282
0
2
Post and beam. Pine or oak frame. Cedar siding.
They did that centuries ago. Choose a cave! Not mocking or offending, buy a cave and decorate it. I bet it’d last for centuries. Not sure about feasibility of insulation and other stuff it might be doable.
0
47,854
2,000
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i0beduh
i08cjvf
1,647,048,282
1,647,000,831
2
1
They did that centuries ago. Choose a cave! Not mocking or offending, buy a cave and decorate it. I bet it’d last for centuries. Not sure about feasibility of insulation and other stuff it might be doable.
I’d say stone but it would have to be done with stone blocks that form ‘butter’ joints with minimal mortar required, bc the mortar won’t last long before it needs repointing.
1
47,451
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08ie0o
i0beduh
1,647,004,264
1,647,048,282
1
2
You can visit the articles at https://www.ecohome.net/ . They are "a team of engineers, environmentalists and former home builders committed to providing homeowners and builders with essential information to create more sustainable, durable and healthier homes." They cover everything from insulation to flooring to exterior materials. It's based in Québec so it might not be entirely relevant to you depending on your location but it can give you a lot of good staring points.
They did that centuries ago. Choose a cave! Not mocking or offending, buy a cave and decorate it. I bet it’d last for centuries. Not sure about feasibility of insulation and other stuff it might be doable.
0
44,018
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i0beduh
i08kfu7
1,647,048,282
1,647,005,349
2
1
They did that centuries ago. Choose a cave! Not mocking or offending, buy a cave and decorate it. I bet it’d last for centuries. Not sure about feasibility of insulation and other stuff it might be doable.
There is so many ways to look at building sustainably. It will take a lot of research for where and what. Most sustainable is to reuse as much of an existing building as possible. All buildings will require some level of maintenance and repair over time but certain materials will require less frequency of repairs. Key to longevity is annual maintenance and care. Over time, technology of materials and products improve. For example, a 100 year building may have great bones but it’ll have windows that are single pane and drafty, but replacement is warranted for better insulated windows for energy savings in heating the building. So 50 Years from today, there could be a product that is going to improve your building so greatly that you’ll want to replace or retrofit it even if not broken because it will benefit the environment in some way.
1
42,933
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i0beduh
i08kqfb
1,647,048,282
1,647,005,504
2
1
They did that centuries ago. Choose a cave! Not mocking or offending, buy a cave and decorate it. I bet it’d last for centuries. Not sure about feasibility of insulation and other stuff it might be doable.
I'd go Compressed Earth Bricks - eco friendly, long-lasting, fire-resistant, some of the best insulation.
1
42,778
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i0beduh
i08kxu6
1,647,048,282
1,647,005,611
2
1
They did that centuries ago. Choose a cave! Not mocking or offending, buy a cave and decorate it. I bet it’d last for centuries. Not sure about feasibility of insulation and other stuff it might be doable.
Low co2 concrete and regional stone.
1
42,671
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08mjgc
i0beduh
1,647,006,410
1,647,048,282
1
2
Log Cabin if it need be small. Timber frame if med size. But if you purchase an existing masonry house, it will be eco friendly as the making of the brick or harvesting the stone has been done, as well as the mortar. Yes you will prob need to do a restoration, but if you follow the original, that will last and the new eco foot print will be less than anything new.
They did that centuries ago. Choose a cave! Not mocking or offending, buy a cave and decorate it. I bet it’d last for centuries. Not sure about feasibility of insulation and other stuff it might be doable.
0
41,872
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08pv3v
i0beduh
1,647,007,999
1,647,048,282
1
2
Build it out of reinforced concrete - if done correctly, it will last centuries
They did that centuries ago. Choose a cave! Not mocking or offending, buy a cave and decorate it. I bet it’d last for centuries. Not sure about feasibility of insulation and other stuff it might be doable.
0
40,283
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i09oerj
i0beduh
1,647,021,860
1,647,048,282
1
2
Pyramid
They did that centuries ago. Choose a cave! Not mocking or offending, buy a cave and decorate it. I bet it’d last for centuries. Not sure about feasibility of insulation and other stuff it might be doable.
0
26,422
2
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08b4sf
i08eqsf
1,646,999,877
1,647,002,194
0
1
Clay and bamboos
The most eco-friendly building you can build is no building at all. The carbon embodied in new materials is simply going to entail more emissions than any existing home. So, if you are going to build a new home, understand its not the best eco-friendly option. By all means, build a house if you want to build a house, but understand the complete picture.... I say this as someone who is in the process of building a house. If you want to build a house with minimal impact on the environment, you should look for local materials. You could do a locally sourced timber framed straw bale home with a permanent wood foundation, recycled metal roof. It should be small and efficient. Here is a decent article on straw-bale homes: https://www.finehomebuilding.com/2018/10/10/houses-design-case-straw-bale-houses
0
2,317
1,000
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08eqsf
i08bxua
1,647,002,194
1,647,000,428
1
0
The most eco-friendly building you can build is no building at all. The carbon embodied in new materials is simply going to entail more emissions than any existing home. So, if you are going to build a new home, understand its not the best eco-friendly option. By all means, build a house if you want to build a house, but understand the complete picture.... I say this as someone who is in the process of building a house. If you want to build a house with minimal impact on the environment, you should look for local materials. You could do a locally sourced timber framed straw bale home with a permanent wood foundation, recycled metal roof. It should be small and efficient. Here is a decent article on straw-bale homes: https://www.finehomebuilding.com/2018/10/10/houses-design-case-straw-bale-houses
Post and beam. Pine or oak frame. Cedar siding.
1
1,766
1,000
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08ewbz
i08b4sf
1,647,002,286
1,646,999,877
1
0
Rammed earth walls
Clay and bamboos
1
2,409
1,000
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08bxua
i08ewbz
1,647,000,428
1,647,002,286
0
1
Post and beam. Pine or oak frame. Cedar siding.
Rammed earth walls
0
1,858
1,000
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08b4sf
i08jmv3
1,646,999,877
1,647,004,926
0
1
Clay and bamboos
I would go something with steel structure. So I can swap elements. Maybe expand in 50 years. Thick walls with minimal openings exept for the northfacade for minimising heating and cooling expenses. Making roof out of solar panels are always an option or adding wind turbines might. Going gray on paint might be logical for wear and tear. We dont do any timber construction in Turkey so I defaulted to steel.
0
5,049
1,000
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08bxua
i08jmv3
1,647,000,428
1,647,004,926
0
1
Post and beam. Pine or oak frame. Cedar siding.
I would go something with steel structure. So I can swap elements. Maybe expand in 50 years. Thick walls with minimal openings exept for the northfacade for minimising heating and cooling expenses. Making roof out of solar panels are always an option or adding wind turbines might. Going gray on paint might be logical for wear and tear. We dont do any timber construction in Turkey so I defaulted to steel.
0
4,498
1,000
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08b4sf
i08cjvf
1,646,999,877
1,647,000,831
0
1
Clay and bamboos
I’d say stone but it would have to be done with stone blocks that form ‘butter’ joints with minimal mortar required, bc the mortar won’t last long before it needs repointing.
0
954
1,000
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08ie0o
i08b4sf
1,647,004,264
1,646,999,877
1
0
You can visit the articles at https://www.ecohome.net/ . They are "a team of engineers, environmentalists and former home builders committed to providing homeowners and builders with essential information to create more sustainable, durable and healthier homes." They cover everything from insulation to flooring to exterior materials. It's based in Québec so it might not be entirely relevant to you depending on your location but it can give you a lot of good staring points.
Clay and bamboos
1
4,387
1,000
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08kfu7
i08b4sf
1,647,005,349
1,646,999,877
1
0
There is so many ways to look at building sustainably. It will take a lot of research for where and what. Most sustainable is to reuse as much of an existing building as possible. All buildings will require some level of maintenance and repair over time but certain materials will require less frequency of repairs. Key to longevity is annual maintenance and care. Over time, technology of materials and products improve. For example, a 100 year building may have great bones but it’ll have windows that are single pane and drafty, but replacement is warranted for better insulated windows for energy savings in heating the building. So 50 Years from today, there could be a product that is going to improve your building so greatly that you’ll want to replace or retrofit it even if not broken because it will benefit the environment in some way.
Clay and bamboos
1
5,472
1,000
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08kqfb
i08b4sf
1,647,005,504
1,646,999,877
1
0
I'd go Compressed Earth Bricks - eco friendly, long-lasting, fire-resistant, some of the best insulation.
Clay and bamboos
1
5,627
1,000
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08kxu6
i08b4sf
1,647,005,611
1,646,999,877
1
0
Low co2 concrete and regional stone.
Clay and bamboos
1
5,734
1,000
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08mjgc
i08b4sf
1,647,006,410
1,646,999,877
1
0
Log Cabin if it need be small. Timber frame if med size. But if you purchase an existing masonry house, it will be eco friendly as the making of the brick or harvesting the stone has been done, as well as the mortar. Yes you will prob need to do a restoration, but if you follow the original, that will last and the new eco foot print will be less than anything new.
Clay and bamboos
1
6,533
1,000
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08pv3v
i08b4sf
1,647,007,999
1,646,999,877
1
0
Build it out of reinforced concrete - if done correctly, it will last centuries
Clay and bamboos
1
8,122
1,000
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i09oerj
i08b4sf
1,647,021,860
1,646,999,877
1
0
Pyramid
Clay and bamboos
1
21,983
1,000
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08cjvf
i08bxua
1,647,000,831
1,647,000,428
1
0
I’d say stone but it would have to be done with stone blocks that form ‘butter’ joints with minimal mortar required, bc the mortar won’t last long before it needs repointing.
Post and beam. Pine or oak frame. Cedar siding.
1
403
1,000
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08ie0o
i08bxua
1,647,004,264
1,647,000,428
1
0
You can visit the articles at https://www.ecohome.net/ . They are "a team of engineers, environmentalists and former home builders committed to providing homeowners and builders with essential information to create more sustainable, durable and healthier homes." They cover everything from insulation to flooring to exterior materials. It's based in Québec so it might not be entirely relevant to you depending on your location but it can give you a lot of good staring points.
Post and beam. Pine or oak frame. Cedar siding.
1
3,836
1,000
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08kfu7
i08bxua
1,647,005,349
1,647,000,428
1
0
There is so many ways to look at building sustainably. It will take a lot of research for where and what. Most sustainable is to reuse as much of an existing building as possible. All buildings will require some level of maintenance and repair over time but certain materials will require less frequency of repairs. Key to longevity is annual maintenance and care. Over time, technology of materials and products improve. For example, a 100 year building may have great bones but it’ll have windows that are single pane and drafty, but replacement is warranted for better insulated windows for energy savings in heating the building. So 50 Years from today, there could be a product that is going to improve your building so greatly that you’ll want to replace or retrofit it even if not broken because it will benefit the environment in some way.
Post and beam. Pine or oak frame. Cedar siding.
1
4,921
1,000
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08bxua
i08kqfb
1,647,000,428
1,647,005,504
0
1
Post and beam. Pine or oak frame. Cedar siding.
I'd go Compressed Earth Bricks - eco friendly, long-lasting, fire-resistant, some of the best insulation.
0
5,076
1,000
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08kxu6
i08bxua
1,647,005,611
1,647,000,428
1
0
Low co2 concrete and regional stone.
Post and beam. Pine or oak frame. Cedar siding.
1
5,183
1,000
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08mjgc
i08bxua
1,647,006,410
1,647,000,428
1
0
Log Cabin if it need be small. Timber frame if med size. But if you purchase an existing masonry house, it will be eco friendly as the making of the brick or harvesting the stone has been done, as well as the mortar. Yes you will prob need to do a restoration, but if you follow the original, that will last and the new eco foot print will be less than anything new.
Post and beam. Pine or oak frame. Cedar siding.
1
5,982
1,000
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08pv3v
i08bxua
1,647,007,999
1,647,000,428
1
0
Build it out of reinforced concrete - if done correctly, it will last centuries
Post and beam. Pine or oak frame. Cedar siding.
1
7,571
1,000
tbnczz
architecture_train
0.85
If I wanna build a house that would last for a century with minimal maintenance, and if possible eco friendly, What would be your recommendations ? I am just an amateur. I always saw historical buildings that lasts for a very very long time (100+ years) and more or less seems to require low maintenance and I was fascinated by them. I was thinking building with stone, with passive air conditioning ?
i08bxua
i09oerj
1,647,000,428
1,647,021,860
0
1
Post and beam. Pine or oak frame. Cedar siding.
Pyramid
0
21,432
1,000
rknm78
architecture_train
0.7
I (non-architect) want to start an architecture/development company with architects and developers. My tenants (in an office I own) are well experienced architects who do houses, interiors, retail fit-outs, etc. My other tenant (in an apartment I own) is now developing a villa. I have already introduced them so that on the next development project, my apartment tenant will be using the office tenant for his architecture needs. However, I want to do more... I read the other day someone said they were making a very good amount of money in the "architect as a developer" business model. I have the capital to support a new development and I now how to take the loss as a new business owner. I have experienced architects. I have a guy who knows how to build villas. My wife is also an architect who hasn't had the chance to really develop a career because we started a family but she has some experience. I myself have started and ran 2 businesses over the last 20 years (in a different sphere) so I can manage a company of 50-100 people, revenue in the 1-10 million/year range, pretty well. My father in law also has a repair/construciton company (mostly focuses on repairs but has also built 2 townhouses). I even have a bunch of people around me looking to invest money into businesses. I feel like I have the ingredients to start a good architecture/development business by putting all this together but before I do and I'd like to read up on the business model. Any books/reading material/resources you guys could suggest? Advice/opinions/warnings/comments on the idea is also highly appreciated! Not really relevant but I almost invested in a full-on architecture/development company as a partner 10 years ago. Someone I know had started it and he had succesfully completed two apartment buildings but I dodged a bullet because the guy's entire empire was shutdown (purely political reasons, not related to his actual work). But now I think building from the ground-up is a decent possibility. Maybe I'm delusional.
hpavn4c
hpbxsqg
1,640,013,076
1,640,028,882
2
3
It seems like all the pieces are there. Just a question of how to put it all together. Why do you want all the overhead and stress of day to day office? As you point out - it's risky business. Why not be the developer GC - hire your tenant architects to do the design and your wife to be the owners rep / boss? With or without your FIL construction co (this is a disaster waiting to happen). Together you can do 2 or 3 projects a year and keep all the profits without all the overhead and liability? Spend winters in Mexico.
I want to point out that the benefit of the "architect as developer" is that the designer is the decision maker. Technically if you hire the designer you're just a developer.
0
15,806
1.5
ga3p8y
architecture_train
0.91
How do I build a design/arch. portfolio for graduate school application without an undergrad in design/architecture? I graduated last spring with a B.S. of Economics, minor in Finance. Before college I had a strong interest in pursuing architecture, but admittedly I was younger, immature, and lazy at the time and didn’t want to grind for it. A year out of school and into a real job (data analytics) I’m rather unfulfilled in the departments of creativity, design, and working with my hands. My school is the only in-state school that offers a masters in Architecture, or a bachelors for that matter. A requirement for all applicants, whether you have prior experience in an undergrad architecture/design program or not, is required to submit a design/work portfolio. What would that look like for someone such as myself with no prior higher education in the field? I have practiced photography (and filmmaking) as an art/hobby for about 6 years now, so my mind immediately jumps to architecture photography or something as part of my portfolio, but that seems silly. Just looking for some guidance so I can begin working on whatever it is I should put together. I can’t apply until this winter so I have time to work. Main questions I have are: What should someone like myself create to put in a portfolio? Should I just focus on making 2-3 examples of work to my best ability, or pump out 5-10 pieces of work and not try to pretend I have a background in it? Thank you to anyone who gives any guidance!
foy4cq2
foxxqpf
1,588,165,007
1,588,159,812
2
1
On top of what everyone else has said, note that architecture is a wide ranging field that encompasses all of the built environment: how to build; what to build; how does the building affect society, the environment. Not every architect draws plans or renders elevations or builds models, some focus entirely on the data behind building - which may play to your current strengths. I’d incorporate the skills you have in data analytics and economics. Analyze some existing buildings or neighborhoods as a system etc.
I went to a M Arch program after graduating with a BS in Engineering, and I can comment from my personal experience that you do not need a prior degree to develop a portfolio that will get you admitted into a reputable M Arch program. In my admissions portfolio, I included things like my (very untrained and unrefined) sketches, paintings, some small wood working projects I had undertaken, a little photography, and then a few nice photographs that documented hobbies of mine that involved some sort of analysis or critical thinking. For example, I took apart and restored an old film camera while in undergrad, so I showed some photographs of the camera neatly "exploded" and then reassembled and explained the process by which I repaired it. I think I also put in a spread explaining an engineering school project I had done which basically showed how to calculate timber beam sizes for a cantilever off a bridge and basically resorted to putting in a sketch of the project and a simplified version of the calculations. Nothing I showed was even close to proper "architecture". The goal of these portfolios is show showcase your ability to think critically and problem solve first and foremost. If you can also show some ways in which you are able to visually represent information (i.e. well done photography, thoughtful sketches, etc) that's also beneficial. For a candidate like yourself, it's more about showing potential than showing super notable prowess in an architecturally specific way. If you're in filmmaking and photography, you do not need to show architectural photography specifically if you don't want. A good critic or evaluator will be able to see the way you frame views and such and appreciate that for its skill and potential from samples of your best work, whether or not its architectural in nature. If you're able, have a friend who works in architecture or a faculty member at the prospective university page through a draft as well to give you feedback. If you're not used to laying out content in a portfolio format, they can make sure you aren't showing work in a distracting way graphically and also help you hone in on what sort of work samples would be most effective. As a final anecdote, I came across my admissions portfolio when doing a purge of files a few years back, and I cringed at how remedial it seemed after graduating and working in the field for awhile. But, I can tell you I graduated at the top of my M Arch class so even if you have a portfolio that isn't perfect or isn't architectural yet, that is not indicative of your ability to succeed in architecture school.
1
5,195
2
ga3p8y
architecture_train
0.91
How do I build a design/arch. portfolio for graduate school application without an undergrad in design/architecture? I graduated last spring with a B.S. of Economics, minor in Finance. Before college I had a strong interest in pursuing architecture, but admittedly I was younger, immature, and lazy at the time and didn’t want to grind for it. A year out of school and into a real job (data analytics) I’m rather unfulfilled in the departments of creativity, design, and working with my hands. My school is the only in-state school that offers a masters in Architecture, or a bachelors for that matter. A requirement for all applicants, whether you have prior experience in an undergrad architecture/design program or not, is required to submit a design/work portfolio. What would that look like for someone such as myself with no prior higher education in the field? I have practiced photography (and filmmaking) as an art/hobby for about 6 years now, so my mind immediately jumps to architecture photography or something as part of my portfolio, but that seems silly. Just looking for some guidance so I can begin working on whatever it is I should put together. I can’t apply until this winter so I have time to work. Main questions I have are: What should someone like myself create to put in a portfolio? Should I just focus on making 2-3 examples of work to my best ability, or pump out 5-10 pieces of work and not try to pretend I have a background in it? Thank you to anyone who gives any guidance!
foxr7lw
foy4cq2
1,588,153,449
1,588,165,007
-3
2
How do you want to succeed in grad school if you don't have a matching undergrad? You miss a lot of knowledge and experience. Especially in Architecture you don't learn from books but from experience.
On top of what everyone else has said, note that architecture is a wide ranging field that encompasses all of the built environment: how to build; what to build; how does the building affect society, the environment. Not every architect draws plans or renders elevations or builds models, some focus entirely on the data behind building - which may play to your current strengths. I’d incorporate the skills you have in data analytics and economics. Analyze some existing buildings or neighborhoods as a system etc.
0
11,558
-0.666667
ga3p8y
architecture_train
0.91
How do I build a design/arch. portfolio for graduate school application without an undergrad in design/architecture? I graduated last spring with a B.S. of Economics, minor in Finance. Before college I had a strong interest in pursuing architecture, but admittedly I was younger, immature, and lazy at the time and didn’t want to grind for it. A year out of school and into a real job (data analytics) I’m rather unfulfilled in the departments of creativity, design, and working with my hands. My school is the only in-state school that offers a masters in Architecture, or a bachelors for that matter. A requirement for all applicants, whether you have prior experience in an undergrad architecture/design program or not, is required to submit a design/work portfolio. What would that look like for someone such as myself with no prior higher education in the field? I have practiced photography (and filmmaking) as an art/hobby for about 6 years now, so my mind immediately jumps to architecture photography or something as part of my portfolio, but that seems silly. Just looking for some guidance so I can begin working on whatever it is I should put together. I can’t apply until this winter so I have time to work. Main questions I have are: What should someone like myself create to put in a portfolio? Should I just focus on making 2-3 examples of work to my best ability, or pump out 5-10 pieces of work and not try to pretend I have a background in it? Thank you to anyone who gives any guidance!
foxxqpf
foxr7lw
1,588,159,812
1,588,153,449
1
-3
I went to a M Arch program after graduating with a BS in Engineering, and I can comment from my personal experience that you do not need a prior degree to develop a portfolio that will get you admitted into a reputable M Arch program. In my admissions portfolio, I included things like my (very untrained and unrefined) sketches, paintings, some small wood working projects I had undertaken, a little photography, and then a few nice photographs that documented hobbies of mine that involved some sort of analysis or critical thinking. For example, I took apart and restored an old film camera while in undergrad, so I showed some photographs of the camera neatly "exploded" and then reassembled and explained the process by which I repaired it. I think I also put in a spread explaining an engineering school project I had done which basically showed how to calculate timber beam sizes for a cantilever off a bridge and basically resorted to putting in a sketch of the project and a simplified version of the calculations. Nothing I showed was even close to proper "architecture". The goal of these portfolios is show showcase your ability to think critically and problem solve first and foremost. If you can also show some ways in which you are able to visually represent information (i.e. well done photography, thoughtful sketches, etc) that's also beneficial. For a candidate like yourself, it's more about showing potential than showing super notable prowess in an architecturally specific way. If you're in filmmaking and photography, you do not need to show architectural photography specifically if you don't want. A good critic or evaluator will be able to see the way you frame views and such and appreciate that for its skill and potential from samples of your best work, whether or not its architectural in nature. If you're able, have a friend who works in architecture or a faculty member at the prospective university page through a draft as well to give you feedback. If you're not used to laying out content in a portfolio format, they can make sure you aren't showing work in a distracting way graphically and also help you hone in on what sort of work samples would be most effective. As a final anecdote, I came across my admissions portfolio when doing a purge of files a few years back, and I cringed at how remedial it seemed after graduating and working in the field for awhile. But, I can tell you I graduated at the top of my M Arch class so even if you have a portfolio that isn't perfect or isn't architectural yet, that is not indicative of your ability to succeed in architecture school.
How do you want to succeed in grad school if you don't have a matching undergrad? You miss a lot of knowledge and experience. Especially in Architecture you don't learn from books but from experience.
1
6,363
-0.333333
9uso99
architecture_train
0.65
[Ask] How do I learn architecture if I just want to learn it for appreciation sake? I would just say outright that I have no interest in becoming an architect. However, I want to learn what architects do. What kinds of architectures are out there (especially modern to contemporary) and how architects design those buildings. I want to learn how I can design a building like an architect, but I guess this sounds naive to actual architects. Basically, I want to learn architecture as much as I can except without committing to a BS/MS in architecture. Are there free or paid courses in or out of universities? Thank You.
e97h18h
e96pmvn
1,541,564,402
1,541,540,731
3
2
Architecture history/theory courses that are required for an architecture degree are often offered as an elective for non-majors. This will give you the appreciation for architecture you mentioned you were looking for and is probably your best option. You won't be able to learn how to design without practice, i.e. enrolling in the studio courses offered for a design degree. There are no classes where you simply sit down and listen as someone tells you how to design a building. That would be nice though.... The Harvard GSD offered a free online course that probably would have been perfect for you, I'd check if they offer that again: https://online-learning.harvard.edu/course/architectural-imagination Short of taking classes, just read about architecture in general. It is all about exposure and seeing as much as you can. I recommend articles on archinect.com and archdaily.com for starters.
I dont know if this is common where you live, but here you can become a auditor at the university for 50€/semester maybe that would be interesting for you :) why do you wanna learn that but dont study?
1
23,671
1.5
9uso99
architecture_train
0.65
[Ask] How do I learn architecture if I just want to learn it for appreciation sake? I would just say outright that I have no interest in becoming an architect. However, I want to learn what architects do. What kinds of architectures are out there (especially modern to contemporary) and how architects design those buildings. I want to learn how I can design a building like an architect, but I guess this sounds naive to actual architects. Basically, I want to learn architecture as much as I can except without committing to a BS/MS in architecture. Are there free or paid courses in or out of universities? Thank You.
e97h18h
e96vly8
1,541,564,402
1,541,545,548
3
2
Architecture history/theory courses that are required for an architecture degree are often offered as an elective for non-majors. This will give you the appreciation for architecture you mentioned you were looking for and is probably your best option. You won't be able to learn how to design without practice, i.e. enrolling in the studio courses offered for a design degree. There are no classes where you simply sit down and listen as someone tells you how to design a building. That would be nice though.... The Harvard GSD offered a free online course that probably would have been perfect for you, I'd check if they offer that again: https://online-learning.harvard.edu/course/architectural-imagination Short of taking classes, just read about architecture in general. It is all about exposure and seeing as much as you can. I recommend articles on archinect.com and archdaily.com for starters.
Learn to love Brutalism
1
18,854
1.5
9uso99
architecture_train
0.65
[Ask] How do I learn architecture if I just want to learn it for appreciation sake? I would just say outright that I have no interest in becoming an architect. However, I want to learn what architects do. What kinds of architectures are out there (especially modern to contemporary) and how architects design those buildings. I want to learn how I can design a building like an architect, but I guess this sounds naive to actual architects. Basically, I want to learn architecture as much as I can except without committing to a BS/MS in architecture. Are there free or paid courses in or out of universities? Thank You.
e96yh70
e97h18h
1,541,548,074
1,541,564,402
2
3
Similar to what others have suggested, look into architecture broadly speaking. Which styles or buildings interest you and carry that into a deeper investigation of the individual or into programs like edx (focuses on broad themes), kanopy (more biographical or related themes), or simply youtube videos for instance. Much of architecture broadly speaking is a direct response to some form of historical moment whether it be social, financial, culture, etc and the more notorious architects usually have written works that you can look into or many others historically who have written on the various subjects that have a direct relation to architectural theory
Architecture history/theory courses that are required for an architecture degree are often offered as an elective for non-majors. This will give you the appreciation for architecture you mentioned you were looking for and is probably your best option. You won't be able to learn how to design without practice, i.e. enrolling in the studio courses offered for a design degree. There are no classes where you simply sit down and listen as someone tells you how to design a building. That would be nice though.... The Harvard GSD offered a free online course that probably would have been perfect for you, I'd check if they offer that again: https://online-learning.harvard.edu/course/architectural-imagination Short of taking classes, just read about architecture in general. It is all about exposure and seeing as much as you can. I recommend articles on archinect.com and archdaily.com for starters.
0
16,328
1.5
c9xha2
architecture_train
0.78
[Ask] How do i learn architecture on the side? I'm an undergrad studying Computer Science and Engineering....I like buildings...How can I learn more about architecture without abandoning my current stream of study, so that one day I'll be able to design my own buildings? Can I do it without going to any Institutions?
et4ly3q
et8981n
1,562,452,623
1,562,550,054
1
3
https://www.youtube.com/user/30by40 - Should be useful.
In most places, you can't legally practice architecture without a formal education of some kind, and most architects don't hire architectural staff who don't have some formal education. But there's no reason why you can't dabble in ideas, read, explore the built environment and listen to lectures. Who knows, you might enjoy it enough to take some classes. The Ching books are great. Also A Pattern Language. And anything about architectural history, so you know how we got to where we are.
0
97,431
3
ak3ml3
architecture_train
1
[ASK] Some good books for beginners. Hello! I'm a young high school student who's interested in architecture. I want you guys to suggest some books on architecture and what it deals with . I really am interested in this subject and want to know more about this subject. Basically all I want is a crash course book about architecture or something like that . Thanks!
ef1syhv
ef1l5s3
1,548,542,550
1,548,537,608
4
3
Form, Space and Order by D. K. Ching. All books by him actually, they're good for beginners.
101 things I learned in architecture school by Mathew Frederick Analysing architecture by Simon Unwin.
1
4,942
1.333333
d0yppr
architecture_train
1
[ASK] Basic things to know and learn about architecture I’m graduating highschool next year and I want to major in Architecture but I’m still new to drawing buildings (I’ve learnt to draw buildings with 2 point perspective). I‘m hoping to know more about the basics and important things about architecture I should learn before uni starts to practice drawing and build my portfolio.
ezgdmx3
ezfj6eh
1,567,895,403
1,567,878,373
4
3
They will give you an approved curriculum, follow it. But if you want grow so you can succeed I have the following suggestions in no particular order: Draw every day. Draw from life and draw your imagination. Learn to write clearly. Take an interest in subjects outside of technology and design - history, politics, economics. Learn to argue and learn to listen. Learn to speak publicly. Visit and observe all buildings, mundane and great. Architecture is about building technology, form and shape. Being an architect is to learn about people, community, environments, and help generate solutions to problems with planned space. Good luck!
Do a Google image search for “observational drawing” and “still life drawing”. Maybe “travel sketch”. A two-point perspective sounds too rational. Look at shape, light, shadow, and texture.
1
17,030
1.333333
obw2be
architecture_train
0.88
What are the best mixed-zone and walkable cities in the US? I know New York, Chicago, Boston, Seattle, etc but are there any mid-sized or smaller cities that have near European-Esq zoning and/or walkability?
h3rd7ms
h3qsdzm
1,625,193,996
1,625,183,048
2
1
Galena, Illinois Eureka Springs, Arkansas Mackinac Island, Michigan
Hoboken, NJ
1
10,948
2