post_id
stringlengths
5
7
domain
stringclasses
18 values
upvote_ratio
float64
0.5
1
history
stringlengths
22
39.2k
c_root_id_A
stringlengths
7
7
c_root_id_B
stringlengths
7
7
created_at_utc_A
int64
1.28B
1.67B
created_at_utc_B
int64
1.28B
1.67B
score_A
int64
2
43.5k
score_B
int64
2
43.2k
human_ref_A
stringlengths
0
10.7k
human_ref_B
stringlengths
0
10.8k
labels
int64
0
1
seconds_difference
float64
0
145M
score_ratio
float64
1
3.72k
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h33gwpi
h347psi
1,624,706,129
1,624,722,857
37
59
Good. Making these articles available to people without the means to access them through publishers asking ridiculous prices is important.
In many underdeveloped countries, it's the only way people can have access to new research. So... good, I guess
0
16,728
1.594595
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h33q3c9
h347psi
1,624,713,132
1,624,722,857
27
59
Well ethically speaking... it's the best.
In many underdeveloped countries, it's the only way people can have access to new research. So... good, I guess
0
9,725
2.185185
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h33urqy
h347psi
1,624,715,979
1,624,722,857
23
59
Absolutely a good thing. It's perverse that publicly funded research is hidden behind paywalls. The paywalls now are even more ridiculous: both the author and the reader are charged, the reviewers are not paid, and there's not even printing costs to justify it because whoever, outside of fossils, goes searching for a printed version of their journal? Literally, we are paying a fuckton of public money for having a .com domain associated to our content. The quicker the system burns, the better.
In many underdeveloped countries, it's the only way people can have access to new research. So... good, I guess
0
6,878
2.565217
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h33nhh6
h347psi
1,624,711,362
1,624,722,857
19
59
It is literally the best thing ever.
In many underdeveloped countries, it's the only way people can have access to new research. So... good, I guess
0
11,495
3.105263
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h347psi
h33z24s
1,624,722,857
1,624,718,357
59
19
In many underdeveloped countries, it's the only way people can have access to new research. So... good, I guess
God sent except God is actually Alexandra Elbakyan
1
4,500
3.105263
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h33obqr
h347psi
1,624,711,949
1,624,722,857
17
59
A very good thing. Publishing companies take money from author, institutions, and readers without paying any of their reviewers . So where does all this money go?
In many underdeveloped countries, it's the only way people can have access to new research. So... good, I guess
0
10,908
3.470588
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h33itnt
h347psi
1,624,707,785
1,624,722,857
15
59
It's the best thing! I have subscription to all the journals through my academic institution but I still use Scihub for the convenience. It is just so quick and easy to use.
In many underdeveloped countries, it's the only way people can have access to new research. So... good, I guess
0
15,072
3.933333
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h347psi
h33wwi0
1,624,722,857
1,624,717,169
59
12
In many underdeveloped countries, it's the only way people can have access to new research. So... good, I guess
I was reading through a proof and the author referenced a result from a different paper. Basically saying, we know this is true because [3]. I was trying to generalize the argument so I needed to know the conditions of the theorem/lemma in order to know if I could still use this result. However, everywhere I looked the referenced paper was behind a paywall—even through my institution. It was like 40 dollars to read this one paper..and I just needed to read like a paragraph of it. I looked it up on SciHub and had it instantly. I read the paragraph, closed it, and was like cool okay I can still use the reference. I can’t imagine having to pay 40 dollars for that. It’s ridiculous.
1
5,688
4.916667
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h347psi
h33rtg1
1,624,722,857
1,624,714,233
59
10
In many underdeveloped countries, it's the only way people can have access to new research. So... good, I guess
Sometimes I use it to access papers I have access to through the university but am too lazy to remember my login/start up the VPN. Don't know where that slots in ethically.
1
8,624
5.9
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h33ncnd
h347psi
1,624,711,267
1,624,722,857
9
59
Good - the article processing charges associated with open access are exorbitant, making it unavailable for many researchers. Buying subscriptions to journals is also expensive - without a subscription, accessing a single article may cost up to 40$. I was writing a case report recently and tried to access an orthopedics article published in the early 1990s and it was still behind a paywall.
In many underdeveloped countries, it's the only way people can have access to new research. So... good, I guess
0
11,590
6.555556
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h3441yo
h347psi
1,624,720,983
1,624,722,857
8
59
As I see it, the best thing in the academic world.
In many underdeveloped countries, it's the only way people can have access to new research. So... good, I guess
0
1,874
7.375
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h344ejp
h347psi
1,624,721,161
1,624,722,857
7
59
A good thing. Copyright doesn’t protect scholars or artists, it protects the wallets of big corporations exploiting our labor for profit without sharing a penny with us.
In many underdeveloped countries, it's the only way people can have access to new research. So... good, I guess
0
1,696
8.428571
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h347psi
h33lssp
1,624,722,857
1,624,710,155
59
6
In many underdeveloped countries, it's the only way people can have access to new research. So... good, I guess
I think it’s amazing. I found it very helpful in undergrad.
1
12,702
9.833333
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h33l38k
h33rck0
1,624,709,625
1,624,713,936
37
41
A good thing. Researchers don't get any money for their views and publishing is a massive rip off as now it is all online. Certain papers might get 1 view a week, the cost of hosting and supplying that is negligible. It isn't like reviewers get paid either.
There are not many things I have extremely strong opinions on, but I absolutely support SciHub. Long live free and open article access!
0
4,311
1.108108
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h33gwpi
h33rck0
1,624,706,129
1,624,713,936
37
41
Good. Making these articles available to people without the means to access them through publishers asking ridiculous prices is important.
There are not many things I have extremely strong opinions on, but I absolutely support SciHub. Long live free and open article access!
0
7,807
1.108108
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h33q3c9
h33rck0
1,624,713,132
1,624,713,936
27
41
Well ethically speaking... it's the best.
There are not many things I have extremely strong opinions on, but I absolutely support SciHub. Long live free and open article access!
0
804
1.518519
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h33nhh6
h33rck0
1,624,711,362
1,624,713,936
19
41
It is literally the best thing ever.
There are not many things I have extremely strong opinions on, but I absolutely support SciHub. Long live free and open article access!
0
2,574
2.157895
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h33obqr
h33rck0
1,624,711,949
1,624,713,936
17
41
A very good thing. Publishing companies take money from author, institutions, and readers without paying any of their reviewers . So where does all this money go?
There are not many things I have extremely strong opinions on, but I absolutely support SciHub. Long live free and open article access!
0
1,987
2.411765
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h33rck0
h33itnt
1,624,713,936
1,624,707,785
41
15
There are not many things I have extremely strong opinions on, but I absolutely support SciHub. Long live free and open article access!
It's the best thing! I have subscription to all the journals through my academic institution but I still use Scihub for the convenience. It is just so quick and easy to use.
1
6,151
2.733333
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h33ncnd
h33rck0
1,624,711,267
1,624,713,936
9
41
Good - the article processing charges associated with open access are exorbitant, making it unavailable for many researchers. Buying subscriptions to journals is also expensive - without a subscription, accessing a single article may cost up to 40$. I was writing a case report recently and tried to access an orthopedics article published in the early 1990s and it was still behind a paywall.
There are not many things I have extremely strong opinions on, but I absolutely support SciHub. Long live free and open article access!
0
2,669
4.555556
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h33lssp
h33rck0
1,624,710,155
1,624,713,936
6
41
I think it’s amazing. I found it very helpful in undergrad.
There are not many things I have extremely strong opinions on, but I absolutely support SciHub. Long live free and open article access!
0
3,781
6.833333
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h33l38k
h33itnt
1,624,709,625
1,624,707,785
37
15
A good thing. Researchers don't get any money for their views and publishing is a massive rip off as now it is all online. Certain papers might get 1 view a week, the cost of hosting and supplying that is negligible. It isn't like reviewers get paid either.
It's the best thing! I have subscription to all the journals through my academic institution but I still use Scihub for the convenience. It is just so quick and easy to use.
1
1,840
2.466667
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h33nhh6
h33q3c9
1,624,711,362
1,624,713,132
19
27
It is literally the best thing ever.
Well ethically speaking... it's the best.
0
1,770
1.421053
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h33obqr
h33q3c9
1,624,711,949
1,624,713,132
17
27
A very good thing. Publishing companies take money from author, institutions, and readers without paying any of their reviewers . So where does all this money go?
Well ethically speaking... it's the best.
0
1,183
1.588235
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h33q3c9
h33itnt
1,624,713,132
1,624,707,785
27
15
Well ethically speaking... it's the best.
It's the best thing! I have subscription to all the journals through my academic institution but I still use Scihub for the convenience. It is just so quick and easy to use.
1
5,347
1.8
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h33ncnd
h33q3c9
1,624,711,267
1,624,713,132
9
27
Good - the article processing charges associated with open access are exorbitant, making it unavailable for many researchers. Buying subscriptions to journals is also expensive - without a subscription, accessing a single article may cost up to 40$. I was writing a case report recently and tried to access an orthopedics article published in the early 1990s and it was still behind a paywall.
Well ethically speaking... it's the best.
0
1,865
3
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h33q3c9
h33lssp
1,624,713,132
1,624,710,155
27
6
Well ethically speaking... it's the best.
I think it’s amazing. I found it very helpful in undergrad.
1
2,977
4.5
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h33urqy
h33nhh6
1,624,715,979
1,624,711,362
23
19
Absolutely a good thing. It's perverse that publicly funded research is hidden behind paywalls. The paywalls now are even more ridiculous: both the author and the reader are charged, the reviewers are not paid, and there's not even printing costs to justify it because whoever, outside of fossils, goes searching for a printed version of their journal? Literally, we are paying a fuckton of public money for having a .com domain associated to our content. The quicker the system burns, the better.
It is literally the best thing ever.
1
4,617
1.210526
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h33obqr
h33urqy
1,624,711,949
1,624,715,979
17
23
A very good thing. Publishing companies take money from author, institutions, and readers without paying any of their reviewers . So where does all this money go?
Absolutely a good thing. It's perverse that publicly funded research is hidden behind paywalls. The paywalls now are even more ridiculous: both the author and the reader are charged, the reviewers are not paid, and there's not even printing costs to justify it because whoever, outside of fossils, goes searching for a printed version of their journal? Literally, we are paying a fuckton of public money for having a .com domain associated to our content. The quicker the system burns, the better.
0
4,030
1.352941
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h33itnt
h33urqy
1,624,707,785
1,624,715,979
15
23
It's the best thing! I have subscription to all the journals through my academic institution but I still use Scihub for the convenience. It is just so quick and easy to use.
Absolutely a good thing. It's perverse that publicly funded research is hidden behind paywalls. The paywalls now are even more ridiculous: both the author and the reader are charged, the reviewers are not paid, and there's not even printing costs to justify it because whoever, outside of fossils, goes searching for a printed version of their journal? Literally, we are paying a fuckton of public money for having a .com domain associated to our content. The quicker the system burns, the better.
0
8,194
1.533333
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h33rtg1
h33urqy
1,624,714,233
1,624,715,979
10
23
Sometimes I use it to access papers I have access to through the university but am too lazy to remember my login/start up the VPN. Don't know where that slots in ethically.
Absolutely a good thing. It's perverse that publicly funded research is hidden behind paywalls. The paywalls now are even more ridiculous: both the author and the reader are charged, the reviewers are not paid, and there's not even printing costs to justify it because whoever, outside of fossils, goes searching for a printed version of their journal? Literally, we are paying a fuckton of public money for having a .com domain associated to our content. The quicker the system burns, the better.
0
1,746
2.3
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h33ncnd
h33urqy
1,624,711,267
1,624,715,979
9
23
Good - the article processing charges associated with open access are exorbitant, making it unavailable for many researchers. Buying subscriptions to journals is also expensive - without a subscription, accessing a single article may cost up to 40$. I was writing a case report recently and tried to access an orthopedics article published in the early 1990s and it was still behind a paywall.
Absolutely a good thing. It's perverse that publicly funded research is hidden behind paywalls. The paywalls now are even more ridiculous: both the author and the reader are charged, the reviewers are not paid, and there's not even printing costs to justify it because whoever, outside of fossils, goes searching for a printed version of their journal? Literally, we are paying a fuckton of public money for having a .com domain associated to our content. The quicker the system burns, the better.
0
4,712
2.555556
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h33urqy
h33lssp
1,624,715,979
1,624,710,155
23
6
Absolutely a good thing. It's perverse that publicly funded research is hidden behind paywalls. The paywalls now are even more ridiculous: both the author and the reader are charged, the reviewers are not paid, and there's not even printing costs to justify it because whoever, outside of fossils, goes searching for a printed version of their journal? Literally, we are paying a fuckton of public money for having a .com domain associated to our content. The quicker the system burns, the better.
I think it’s amazing. I found it very helpful in undergrad.
1
5,824
3.833333
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h33itnt
h33nhh6
1,624,707,785
1,624,711,362
15
19
It's the best thing! I have subscription to all the journals through my academic institution but I still use Scihub for the convenience. It is just so quick and easy to use.
It is literally the best thing ever.
0
3,577
1.266667
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h33ncnd
h33nhh6
1,624,711,267
1,624,711,362
9
19
Good - the article processing charges associated with open access are exorbitant, making it unavailable for many researchers. Buying subscriptions to journals is also expensive - without a subscription, accessing a single article may cost up to 40$. I was writing a case report recently and tried to access an orthopedics article published in the early 1990s and it was still behind a paywall.
It is literally the best thing ever.
0
95
2.111111
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h33nhh6
h33lssp
1,624,711,362
1,624,710,155
19
6
It is literally the best thing ever.
I think it’s amazing. I found it very helpful in undergrad.
1
1,207
3.166667
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h33z24s
h33obqr
1,624,718,357
1,624,711,949
19
17
God sent except God is actually Alexandra Elbakyan
A very good thing. Publishing companies take money from author, institutions, and readers without paying any of their reviewers . So where does all this money go?
1
6,408
1.117647
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h33z24s
h33itnt
1,624,718,357
1,624,707,785
19
15
God sent except God is actually Alexandra Elbakyan
It's the best thing! I have subscription to all the journals through my academic institution but I still use Scihub for the convenience. It is just so quick and easy to use.
1
10,572
1.266667
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h33z24s
h33wwi0
1,624,718,357
1,624,717,169
19
12
God sent except God is actually Alexandra Elbakyan
I was reading through a proof and the author referenced a result from a different paper. Basically saying, we know this is true because [3]. I was trying to generalize the argument so I needed to know the conditions of the theorem/lemma in order to know if I could still use this result. However, everywhere I looked the referenced paper was behind a paywall—even through my institution. It was like 40 dollars to read this one paper..and I just needed to read like a paragraph of it. I looked it up on SciHub and had it instantly. I read the paragraph, closed it, and was like cool okay I can still use the reference. I can’t imagine having to pay 40 dollars for that. It’s ridiculous.
1
1,188
1.583333
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h33z24s
h33rtg1
1,624,718,357
1,624,714,233
19
10
God sent except God is actually Alexandra Elbakyan
Sometimes I use it to access papers I have access to through the university but am too lazy to remember my login/start up the VPN. Don't know where that slots in ethically.
1
4,124
1.9
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h33z24s
h33ncnd
1,624,718,357
1,624,711,267
19
9
God sent except God is actually Alexandra Elbakyan
Good - the article processing charges associated with open access are exorbitant, making it unavailable for many researchers. Buying subscriptions to journals is also expensive - without a subscription, accessing a single article may cost up to 40$. I was writing a case report recently and tried to access an orthopedics article published in the early 1990s and it was still behind a paywall.
1
7,090
2.111111
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h33lssp
h33z24s
1,624,710,155
1,624,718,357
6
19
I think it’s amazing. I found it very helpful in undergrad.
God sent except God is actually Alexandra Elbakyan
0
8,202
3.166667
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h33obqr
h33itnt
1,624,711,949
1,624,707,785
17
15
A very good thing. Publishing companies take money from author, institutions, and readers without paying any of their reviewers . So where does all this money go?
It's the best thing! I have subscription to all the journals through my academic institution but I still use Scihub for the convenience. It is just so quick and easy to use.
1
4,164
1.133333
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h33obqr
h33ncnd
1,624,711,949
1,624,711,267
17
9
A very good thing. Publishing companies take money from author, institutions, and readers without paying any of their reviewers . So where does all this money go?
Good - the article processing charges associated with open access are exorbitant, making it unavailable for many researchers. Buying subscriptions to journals is also expensive - without a subscription, accessing a single article may cost up to 40$. I was writing a case report recently and tried to access an orthopedics article published in the early 1990s and it was still behind a paywall.
1
682
1.888889
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h33obqr
h33lssp
1,624,711,949
1,624,710,155
17
6
A very good thing. Publishing companies take money from author, institutions, and readers without paying any of their reviewers . So where does all this money go?
I think it’s amazing. I found it very helpful in undergrad.
1
1,794
2.833333
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h34y65n
h33itnt
1,624,736,241
1,624,707,785
17
15
From my perspective as a researcher working in a non-rich country and with underfunded scientific system, I have to say that not only Sci-Hub is great, it is absolutely NECESSARY. Any initiative that diminishes inequalities is good, imagine one as impactful as Sci-Hub. There are only two possibilities for someone to think that Sci-Hub is a bad thing: (1) you are a situated in a rich country and already has access to all publications that you might need (plus you have no class consciousness) or (2) you are involved with publishers. Personally, I think it is absolutely disgraceful for any scientist not to admire Alexandra Elbakyan.
It's the best thing! I have subscription to all the journals through my academic institution but I still use Scihub for the convenience. It is just so quick and easy to use.
1
28,456
1.133333
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h34y65n
h33wwi0
1,624,736,241
1,624,717,169
17
12
From my perspective as a researcher working in a non-rich country and with underfunded scientific system, I have to say that not only Sci-Hub is great, it is absolutely NECESSARY. Any initiative that diminishes inequalities is good, imagine one as impactful as Sci-Hub. There are only two possibilities for someone to think that Sci-Hub is a bad thing: (1) you are a situated in a rich country and already has access to all publications that you might need (plus you have no class consciousness) or (2) you are involved with publishers. Personally, I think it is absolutely disgraceful for any scientist not to admire Alexandra Elbakyan.
I was reading through a proof and the author referenced a result from a different paper. Basically saying, we know this is true because [3]. I was trying to generalize the argument so I needed to know the conditions of the theorem/lemma in order to know if I could still use this result. However, everywhere I looked the referenced paper was behind a paywall—even through my institution. It was like 40 dollars to read this one paper..and I just needed to read like a paragraph of it. I looked it up on SciHub and had it instantly. I read the paragraph, closed it, and was like cool okay I can still use the reference. I can’t imagine having to pay 40 dollars for that. It’s ridiculous.
1
19,072
1.416667
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h34oyyk
h34y65n
1,624,731,498
1,624,736,241
12
17
The cost of subscriptions is criminal. As an author, I PAY them to publish my work (it’s considered advertising). Printing costs are minimal due to online content so their costs have dropped. Reviewers don’t get paid. We all pay for the research because it’s mostly public funded (tax payer benefits) so in effect, they’re charging everyone to read material that belongs to everyone (in principal). Scihub rules.
From my perspective as a researcher working in a non-rich country and with underfunded scientific system, I have to say that not only Sci-Hub is great, it is absolutely NECESSARY. Any initiative that diminishes inequalities is good, imagine one as impactful as Sci-Hub. There are only two possibilities for someone to think that Sci-Hub is a bad thing: (1) you are a situated in a rich country and already has access to all publications that you might need (plus you have no class consciousness) or (2) you are involved with publishers. Personally, I think it is absolutely disgraceful for any scientist not to admire Alexandra Elbakyan.
0
4,743
1.416667
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h34y65n
h33rtg1
1,624,736,241
1,624,714,233
17
10
From my perspective as a researcher working in a non-rich country and with underfunded scientific system, I have to say that not only Sci-Hub is great, it is absolutely NECESSARY. Any initiative that diminishes inequalities is good, imagine one as impactful as Sci-Hub. There are only two possibilities for someone to think that Sci-Hub is a bad thing: (1) you are a situated in a rich country and already has access to all publications that you might need (plus you have no class consciousness) or (2) you are involved with publishers. Personally, I think it is absolutely disgraceful for any scientist not to admire Alexandra Elbakyan.
Sometimes I use it to access papers I have access to through the university but am too lazy to remember my login/start up the VPN. Don't know where that slots in ethically.
1
22,008
1.7
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h33ncnd
h34y65n
1,624,711,267
1,624,736,241
9
17
Good - the article processing charges associated with open access are exorbitant, making it unavailable for many researchers. Buying subscriptions to journals is also expensive - without a subscription, accessing a single article may cost up to 40$. I was writing a case report recently and tried to access an orthopedics article published in the early 1990s and it was still behind a paywall.
From my perspective as a researcher working in a non-rich country and with underfunded scientific system, I have to say that not only Sci-Hub is great, it is absolutely NECESSARY. Any initiative that diminishes inequalities is good, imagine one as impactful as Sci-Hub. There are only two possibilities for someone to think that Sci-Hub is a bad thing: (1) you are a situated in a rich country and already has access to all publications that you might need (plus you have no class consciousness) or (2) you are involved with publishers. Personally, I think it is absolutely disgraceful for any scientist not to admire Alexandra Elbakyan.
0
24,974
1.888889
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h3441yo
h34y65n
1,624,720,983
1,624,736,241
8
17
As I see it, the best thing in the academic world.
From my perspective as a researcher working in a non-rich country and with underfunded scientific system, I have to say that not only Sci-Hub is great, it is absolutely NECESSARY. Any initiative that diminishes inequalities is good, imagine one as impactful as Sci-Hub. There are only two possibilities for someone to think that Sci-Hub is a bad thing: (1) you are a situated in a rich country and already has access to all publications that you might need (plus you have no class consciousness) or (2) you are involved with publishers. Personally, I think it is absolutely disgraceful for any scientist not to admire Alexandra Elbakyan.
0
15,258
2.125
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h344ejp
h34y65n
1,624,721,161
1,624,736,241
7
17
A good thing. Copyright doesn’t protect scholars or artists, it protects the wallets of big corporations exploiting our labor for profit without sharing a penny with us.
From my perspective as a researcher working in a non-rich country and with underfunded scientific system, I have to say that not only Sci-Hub is great, it is absolutely NECESSARY. Any initiative that diminishes inequalities is good, imagine one as impactful as Sci-Hub. There are only two possibilities for someone to think that Sci-Hub is a bad thing: (1) you are a situated in a rich country and already has access to all publications that you might need (plus you have no class consciousness) or (2) you are involved with publishers. Personally, I think it is absolutely disgraceful for any scientist not to admire Alexandra Elbakyan.
0
15,080
2.428571
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h34y65n
h33lssp
1,624,736,241
1,624,710,155
17
6
From my perspective as a researcher working in a non-rich country and with underfunded scientific system, I have to say that not only Sci-Hub is great, it is absolutely NECESSARY. Any initiative that diminishes inequalities is good, imagine one as impactful as Sci-Hub. There are only two possibilities for someone to think that Sci-Hub is a bad thing: (1) you are a situated in a rich country and already has access to all publications that you might need (plus you have no class consciousness) or (2) you are involved with publishers. Personally, I think it is absolutely disgraceful for any scientist not to admire Alexandra Elbakyan.
I think it’s amazing. I found it very helpful in undergrad.
1
26,086
2.833333
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h34rwql
h34y65n
1,624,733,005
1,624,736,241
7
17
Another tip for those who may have trouble accessing the webpage: there is a scihub telegram bot which you can message the doi and it sends you the paper as attachment. As far as I understand, this gets around any blocks/bans through end to end encryption.
From my perspective as a researcher working in a non-rich country and with underfunded scientific system, I have to say that not only Sci-Hub is great, it is absolutely NECESSARY. Any initiative that diminishes inequalities is good, imagine one as impactful as Sci-Hub. There are only two possibilities for someone to think that Sci-Hub is a bad thing: (1) you are a situated in a rich country and already has access to all publications that you might need (plus you have no class consciousness) or (2) you are involved with publishers. Personally, I think it is absolutely disgraceful for any scientist not to admire Alexandra Elbakyan.
0
3,236
2.428571
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h33wwi0
h33rtg1
1,624,717,169
1,624,714,233
12
10
I was reading through a proof and the author referenced a result from a different paper. Basically saying, we know this is true because [3]. I was trying to generalize the argument so I needed to know the conditions of the theorem/lemma in order to know if I could still use this result. However, everywhere I looked the referenced paper was behind a paywall—even through my institution. It was like 40 dollars to read this one paper..and I just needed to read like a paragraph of it. I looked it up on SciHub and had it instantly. I read the paragraph, closed it, and was like cool okay I can still use the reference. I can’t imagine having to pay 40 dollars for that. It’s ridiculous.
Sometimes I use it to access papers I have access to through the university but am too lazy to remember my login/start up the VPN. Don't know where that slots in ethically.
1
2,936
1.2
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h33wwi0
h33ncnd
1,624,717,169
1,624,711,267
12
9
I was reading through a proof and the author referenced a result from a different paper. Basically saying, we know this is true because [3]. I was trying to generalize the argument so I needed to know the conditions of the theorem/lemma in order to know if I could still use this result. However, everywhere I looked the referenced paper was behind a paywall—even through my institution. It was like 40 dollars to read this one paper..and I just needed to read like a paragraph of it. I looked it up on SciHub and had it instantly. I read the paragraph, closed it, and was like cool okay I can still use the reference. I can’t imagine having to pay 40 dollars for that. It’s ridiculous.
Good - the article processing charges associated with open access are exorbitant, making it unavailable for many researchers. Buying subscriptions to journals is also expensive - without a subscription, accessing a single article may cost up to 40$. I was writing a case report recently and tried to access an orthopedics article published in the early 1990s and it was still behind a paywall.
1
5,902
1.333333
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h33wwi0
h33lssp
1,624,717,169
1,624,710,155
12
6
I was reading through a proof and the author referenced a result from a different paper. Basically saying, we know this is true because [3]. I was trying to generalize the argument so I needed to know the conditions of the theorem/lemma in order to know if I could still use this result. However, everywhere I looked the referenced paper was behind a paywall—even through my institution. It was like 40 dollars to read this one paper..and I just needed to read like a paragraph of it. I looked it up on SciHub and had it instantly. I read the paragraph, closed it, and was like cool okay I can still use the reference. I can’t imagine having to pay 40 dollars for that. It’s ridiculous.
I think it’s amazing. I found it very helpful in undergrad.
1
7,014
2
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h33rtg1
h34oyyk
1,624,714,233
1,624,731,498
10
12
Sometimes I use it to access papers I have access to through the university but am too lazy to remember my login/start up the VPN. Don't know where that slots in ethically.
The cost of subscriptions is criminal. As an author, I PAY them to publish my work (it’s considered advertising). Printing costs are minimal due to online content so their costs have dropped. Reviewers don’t get paid. We all pay for the research because it’s mostly public funded (tax payer benefits) so in effect, they’re charging everyone to read material that belongs to everyone (in principal). Scihub rules.
0
17,265
1.2
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h33ncnd
h34oyyk
1,624,711,267
1,624,731,498
9
12
Good - the article processing charges associated with open access are exorbitant, making it unavailable for many researchers. Buying subscriptions to journals is also expensive - without a subscription, accessing a single article may cost up to 40$. I was writing a case report recently and tried to access an orthopedics article published in the early 1990s and it was still behind a paywall.
The cost of subscriptions is criminal. As an author, I PAY them to publish my work (it’s considered advertising). Printing costs are minimal due to online content so their costs have dropped. Reviewers don’t get paid. We all pay for the research because it’s mostly public funded (tax payer benefits) so in effect, they’re charging everyone to read material that belongs to everyone (in principal). Scihub rules.
0
20,231
1.333333
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h34oyyk
h3441yo
1,624,731,498
1,624,720,983
12
8
The cost of subscriptions is criminal. As an author, I PAY them to publish my work (it’s considered advertising). Printing costs are minimal due to online content so their costs have dropped. Reviewers don’t get paid. We all pay for the research because it’s mostly public funded (tax payer benefits) so in effect, they’re charging everyone to read material that belongs to everyone (in principal). Scihub rules.
As I see it, the best thing in the academic world.
1
10,515
1.5
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h344ejp
h34oyyk
1,624,721,161
1,624,731,498
7
12
A good thing. Copyright doesn’t protect scholars or artists, it protects the wallets of big corporations exploiting our labor for profit without sharing a penny with us.
The cost of subscriptions is criminal. As an author, I PAY them to publish my work (it’s considered advertising). Printing costs are minimal due to online content so their costs have dropped. Reviewers don’t get paid. We all pay for the research because it’s mostly public funded (tax payer benefits) so in effect, they’re charging everyone to read material that belongs to everyone (in principal). Scihub rules.
0
10,337
1.714286
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h33lssp
h34oyyk
1,624,710,155
1,624,731,498
6
12
I think it’s amazing. I found it very helpful in undergrad.
The cost of subscriptions is criminal. As an author, I PAY them to publish my work (it’s considered advertising). Printing costs are minimal due to online content so their costs have dropped. Reviewers don’t get paid. We all pay for the research because it’s mostly public funded (tax payer benefits) so in effect, they’re charging everyone to read material that belongs to everyone (in principal). Scihub rules.
0
21,343
2
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h33rtg1
h33ncnd
1,624,714,233
1,624,711,267
10
9
Sometimes I use it to access papers I have access to through the university but am too lazy to remember my login/start up the VPN. Don't know where that slots in ethically.
Good - the article processing charges associated with open access are exorbitant, making it unavailable for many researchers. Buying subscriptions to journals is also expensive - without a subscription, accessing a single article may cost up to 40$. I was writing a case report recently and tried to access an orthopedics article published in the early 1990s and it was still behind a paywall.
1
2,966
1.111111
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h33lssp
h33rtg1
1,624,710,155
1,624,714,233
6
10
I think it’s amazing. I found it very helpful in undergrad.
Sometimes I use it to access papers I have access to through the university but am too lazy to remember my login/start up the VPN. Don't know where that slots in ethically.
0
4,078
1.666667
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h33lssp
h33ncnd
1,624,710,155
1,624,711,267
6
9
I think it’s amazing. I found it very helpful in undergrad.
Good - the article processing charges associated with open access are exorbitant, making it unavailable for many researchers. Buying subscriptions to journals is also expensive - without a subscription, accessing a single article may cost up to 40$. I was writing a case report recently and tried to access an orthopedics article published in the early 1990s and it was still behind a paywall.
0
1,112
1.5
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h3441yo
h33lssp
1,624,720,983
1,624,710,155
8
6
As I see it, the best thing in the academic world.
I think it’s amazing. I found it very helpful in undergrad.
1
10,828
1.333333
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h33lssp
h344ejp
1,624,710,155
1,624,721,161
6
7
I think it’s amazing. I found it very helpful in undergrad.
A good thing. Copyright doesn’t protect scholars or artists, it protects the wallets of big corporations exploiting our labor for profit without sharing a penny with us.
0
11,006
1.166667
o88pcv
askacademia_train
0.97
Is SciHub a good thing or a bad thing? It's blocked at my university and I was just wondering what the general consensus is about this website. Happy Saturday.
h33lssp
h34rwql
1,624,710,155
1,624,733,005
6
7
I think it’s amazing. I found it very helpful in undergrad.
Another tip for those who may have trouble accessing the webpage: there is a scihub telegram bot which you can message the doi and it sends you the paper as attachment. As far as I understand, this gets around any blocks/bans through end to end encryption.
0
22,850
1.166667
i9taxd
askacademia_train
0.92
imposter syndrome is a blast Can we talk about imposter syndrome and navigating academia in STEM as a young woman? I feel drastically under-qualified doing nearly everything my mentors encourage me to do. I do the things anyway, but the discomfort doesn't seem to dissipate the further I get. ​ But also, I am a second year grad student, highest degree BA, presenting at a medical conference in November, presenting among all other MDs. How the fuck am I supposed to feel about this D:
g1hdcqd
g1he275
1,597,437,258
1,597,437,593
7
168
I have a theory that imposter syndrome is closely related to your cultural background, and the kind of representation that academics had in art during your formative years.
Bad news - it's not going away. It doesn't matter how much you will achieve it will be with you. Good news - everyone feels it. So don't worry too much, it's normal, one step at a time, you'll get there.
0
335
24
i9taxd
askacademia_train
0.92
imposter syndrome is a blast Can we talk about imposter syndrome and navigating academia in STEM as a young woman? I feel drastically under-qualified doing nearly everything my mentors encourage me to do. I do the things anyway, but the discomfort doesn't seem to dissipate the further I get. ​ But also, I am a second year grad student, highest degree BA, presenting at a medical conference in November, presenting among all other MDs. How the fuck am I supposed to feel about this D:
g1hdcqd
g1hg1l5
1,597,437,258
1,597,438,453
7
64
I have a theory that imposter syndrome is closely related to your cultural background, and the kind of representation that academics had in art during your formative years.
As another woman in STEM, it helps me to talk to people in other fields and those outside of academia. I tend to assume a lot of what I know is common knowledge or easy to understand or largely covered in other fields but in different frameworks. When I have to explain my work to someone else, I quickly realize that isn't true. It also gives me a chance to appreciate the other person's expertise and how nice it is that different people are good at different things. I also look for objective markers of my success and try to save them somewhere I can look at them when I forget. It's amazing how those accomplishments disappear from my mind when I am feeling bad about myself.
0
1,195
9.142857
i9taxd
askacademia_train
0.92
imposter syndrome is a blast Can we talk about imposter syndrome and navigating academia in STEM as a young woman? I feel drastically under-qualified doing nearly everything my mentors encourage me to do. I do the things anyway, but the discomfort doesn't seem to dissipate the further I get. ​ But also, I am a second year grad student, highest degree BA, presenting at a medical conference in November, presenting among all other MDs. How the fuck am I supposed to feel about this D:
g1hncfj
g1hjrik
1,597,441,982
1,597,440,228
24
17
This letter written by Nobel Laureate Richard Feynman is always my go-to when trying to combat imposture syndrome myself. All these MDs at your conference are people, too. They are not omnipotent beings! Plus, from what I gather about MDs, many of them are somewhat out-of-touch with cutting edge research (particularly outside their specialty). In other words, in the eyes of many of the MDs there, *you* will be the expert, even if you don't feel like it. If that makes you uncomfortable, personally, I fall back on what I know and try not to speculate on what I do not. One of the most eye-opening experiences I have had in grad school was at a conference outside of my major domain of study. I went with my advisor and two other faculty--each are very respected in their domains. During a particular session, I felt like an idiot because I just could NOT understand what was being presented. After the session, all four of us got together and they all felt the same way. The moral of the story being that it's okay not to know everything and everything, there is *always* more to learn. The main purpose for virtually all conferences is to share your knowledge with others. If we already knew everything going it, these conferences would just be an expensive, multi-day happy hour.
I finished my PhD in 2017 and have been an Assistant Professor since but I still have imposter syndrome. I’m not even comfortable when people call me Dr. ... It will take time but keep doing your best
1
1,754
1.411765
i9taxd
askacademia_train
0.92
imposter syndrome is a blast Can we talk about imposter syndrome and navigating academia in STEM as a young woman? I feel drastically under-qualified doing nearly everything my mentors encourage me to do. I do the things anyway, but the discomfort doesn't seem to dissipate the further I get. ​ But also, I am a second year grad student, highest degree BA, presenting at a medical conference in November, presenting among all other MDs. How the fuck am I supposed to feel about this D:
g1hi3tg
g1hncfj
1,597,439,424
1,597,441,982
10
24
Fake it til you make it. The beauty of science is that you're often doing things people haven't done before and it's acceptable to say you don't know if you don't know something or you need to look it up.
This letter written by Nobel Laureate Richard Feynman is always my go-to when trying to combat imposture syndrome myself. All these MDs at your conference are people, too. They are not omnipotent beings! Plus, from what I gather about MDs, many of them are somewhat out-of-touch with cutting edge research (particularly outside their specialty). In other words, in the eyes of many of the MDs there, *you* will be the expert, even if you don't feel like it. If that makes you uncomfortable, personally, I fall back on what I know and try not to speculate on what I do not. One of the most eye-opening experiences I have had in grad school was at a conference outside of my major domain of study. I went with my advisor and two other faculty--each are very respected in their domains. During a particular session, I felt like an idiot because I just could NOT understand what was being presented. After the session, all four of us got together and they all felt the same way. The moral of the story being that it's okay not to know everything and everything, there is *always* more to learn. The main purpose for virtually all conferences is to share your knowledge with others. If we already knew everything going it, these conferences would just be an expensive, multi-day happy hour.
0
2,558
2.4
i9taxd
askacademia_train
0.92
imposter syndrome is a blast Can we talk about imposter syndrome and navigating academia in STEM as a young woman? I feel drastically under-qualified doing nearly everything my mentors encourage me to do. I do the things anyway, but the discomfort doesn't seem to dissipate the further I get. ​ But also, I am a second year grad student, highest degree BA, presenting at a medical conference in November, presenting among all other MDs. How the fuck am I supposed to feel about this D:
g1hdcqd
g1hncfj
1,597,437,258
1,597,441,982
7
24
I have a theory that imposter syndrome is closely related to your cultural background, and the kind of representation that academics had in art during your formative years.
This letter written by Nobel Laureate Richard Feynman is always my go-to when trying to combat imposture syndrome myself. All these MDs at your conference are people, too. They are not omnipotent beings! Plus, from what I gather about MDs, many of them are somewhat out-of-touch with cutting edge research (particularly outside their specialty). In other words, in the eyes of many of the MDs there, *you* will be the expert, even if you don't feel like it. If that makes you uncomfortable, personally, I fall back on what I know and try not to speculate on what I do not. One of the most eye-opening experiences I have had in grad school was at a conference outside of my major domain of study. I went with my advisor and two other faculty--each are very respected in their domains. During a particular session, I felt like an idiot because I just could NOT understand what was being presented. After the session, all four of us got together and they all felt the same way. The moral of the story being that it's okay not to know everything and everything, there is *always* more to learn. The main purpose for virtually all conferences is to share your knowledge with others. If we already knew everything going it, these conferences would just be an expensive, multi-day happy hour.
0
4,724
3.428571
i9taxd
askacademia_train
0.92
imposter syndrome is a blast Can we talk about imposter syndrome and navigating academia in STEM as a young woman? I feel drastically under-qualified doing nearly everything my mentors encourage me to do. I do the things anyway, but the discomfort doesn't seem to dissipate the further I get. ​ But also, I am a second year grad student, highest degree BA, presenting at a medical conference in November, presenting among all other MDs. How the fuck am I supposed to feel about this D:
g1hncfj
g1hjr00
1,597,441,982
1,597,440,221
24
6
This letter written by Nobel Laureate Richard Feynman is always my go-to when trying to combat imposture syndrome myself. All these MDs at your conference are people, too. They are not omnipotent beings! Plus, from what I gather about MDs, many of them are somewhat out-of-touch with cutting edge research (particularly outside their specialty). In other words, in the eyes of many of the MDs there, *you* will be the expert, even if you don't feel like it. If that makes you uncomfortable, personally, I fall back on what I know and try not to speculate on what I do not. One of the most eye-opening experiences I have had in grad school was at a conference outside of my major domain of study. I went with my advisor and two other faculty--each are very respected in their domains. During a particular session, I felt like an idiot because I just could NOT understand what was being presented. After the session, all four of us got together and they all felt the same way. The moral of the story being that it's okay not to know everything and everything, there is *always* more to learn. The main purpose for virtually all conferences is to share your knowledge with others. If we already knew everything going it, these conferences would just be an expensive, multi-day happy hour.
It's not 'you vs curriculum' anymore, it's 'you vs god'. We're all unqualified. Finishing your degree isnt about not feeling this way, it's about doing exactly what you're doing. Pushing forward despite the emotional trauma. As for speaking, if you've done something someone else hasnt done, then you have something to say. There may or may not be pushback, but saying stuff to other smart people is the job. No one is gonna beat you up afterwards, so just do the best job you can, sit down, feel like shit, second guess, and repeat until you graduate. I hate to put it this way, but fuck your feelings. They're a shit barometer of how you're actually doing. Unless you get fired, you're doing fine.
1
1,761
4
i9taxd
askacademia_train
0.92
imposter syndrome is a blast Can we talk about imposter syndrome and navigating academia in STEM as a young woman? I feel drastically under-qualified doing nearly everything my mentors encourage me to do. I do the things anyway, but the discomfort doesn't seem to dissipate the further I get. ​ But also, I am a second year grad student, highest degree BA, presenting at a medical conference in November, presenting among all other MDs. How the fuck am I supposed to feel about this D:
g1hkqwu
g1hncfj
1,597,440,705
1,597,441,982
5
24
Is this your first conference presentation?! If so congrats! Once you get over the nerves everyone has, it can be really fun and rewarding. Everyone is nervous and apprehensive before their first (several) conference presentations; I still get so nervous during conference presentations that I talk 8,000 miles a minute. Imposter syndrome is always going to be there. I was applying to TT jobs this time last year and reading the admission requirements for the Master's program at a department I was applying to. And I caught myself thinking, "Oh gosh, I'm not sure I can get into this program..." and I felt really intimidated for several minutes, until I snapped out of it and realized I already have a masters degree (and a PhD and have done 2 post-docs) and that I was being RIDICULOUS. It just never goes away! The only way to gain experience is by DOING, and that's what I remind myself all the time. If I let my imposter syndrome get the best of me I won't ever DO anything, and then I really won't have the right experience. Participate as much as you can, learn from as many people as you can, and remind yourself that WE ALL feel the same insufficiencies.
This letter written by Nobel Laureate Richard Feynman is always my go-to when trying to combat imposture syndrome myself. All these MDs at your conference are people, too. They are not omnipotent beings! Plus, from what I gather about MDs, many of them are somewhat out-of-touch with cutting edge research (particularly outside their specialty). In other words, in the eyes of many of the MDs there, *you* will be the expert, even if you don't feel like it. If that makes you uncomfortable, personally, I fall back on what I know and try not to speculate on what I do not. One of the most eye-opening experiences I have had in grad school was at a conference outside of my major domain of study. I went with my advisor and two other faculty--each are very respected in their domains. During a particular session, I felt like an idiot because I just could NOT understand what was being presented. After the session, all four of us got together and they all felt the same way. The moral of the story being that it's okay not to know everything and everything, there is *always* more to learn. The main purpose for virtually all conferences is to share your knowledge with others. If we already knew everything going it, these conferences would just be an expensive, multi-day happy hour.
0
1,277
4.8
i9taxd
askacademia_train
0.92
imposter syndrome is a blast Can we talk about imposter syndrome and navigating academia in STEM as a young woman? I feel drastically under-qualified doing nearly everything my mentors encourage me to do. I do the things anyway, but the discomfort doesn't seem to dissipate the further I get. ​ But also, I am a second year grad student, highest degree BA, presenting at a medical conference in November, presenting among all other MDs. How the fuck am I supposed to feel about this D:
g1hncfj
g1hm7i6
1,597,441,982
1,597,441,424
24
4
This letter written by Nobel Laureate Richard Feynman is always my go-to when trying to combat imposture syndrome myself. All these MDs at your conference are people, too. They are not omnipotent beings! Plus, from what I gather about MDs, many of them are somewhat out-of-touch with cutting edge research (particularly outside their specialty). In other words, in the eyes of many of the MDs there, *you* will be the expert, even if you don't feel like it. If that makes you uncomfortable, personally, I fall back on what I know and try not to speculate on what I do not. One of the most eye-opening experiences I have had in grad school was at a conference outside of my major domain of study. I went with my advisor and two other faculty--each are very respected in their domains. During a particular session, I felt like an idiot because I just could NOT understand what was being presented. After the session, all four of us got together and they all felt the same way. The moral of the story being that it's okay not to know everything and everything, there is *always* more to learn. The main purpose for virtually all conferences is to share your knowledge with others. If we already knew everything going it, these conferences would just be an expensive, multi-day happy hour.
Remember that you know more about your own research than anyone else, and it is worth sharing. It does seem that imposter syndrome never goes away, though. I just started a postdoc and boy is it hitting me hard.
1
558
6
i9taxd
askacademia_train
0.92
imposter syndrome is a blast Can we talk about imposter syndrome and navigating academia in STEM as a young woman? I feel drastically under-qualified doing nearly everything my mentors encourage me to do. I do the things anyway, but the discomfort doesn't seem to dissipate the further I get. ​ But also, I am a second year grad student, highest degree BA, presenting at a medical conference in November, presenting among all other MDs. How the fuck am I supposed to feel about this D:
g1hmoow
g1hncfj
1,597,441,657
1,597,441,982
2
24
It helped me when I realised that my professors didn't know everything. Even when they seemed to have an answer for everything, eventually I realised just how often they were bluffing a bit. Made me feel like it's OK not to know everything, or that there's strength in admitting "I'm not sure, but I can look it up/ ask someone who would know/ point you in the right direction"
This letter written by Nobel Laureate Richard Feynman is always my go-to when trying to combat imposture syndrome myself. All these MDs at your conference are people, too. They are not omnipotent beings! Plus, from what I gather about MDs, many of them are somewhat out-of-touch with cutting edge research (particularly outside their specialty). In other words, in the eyes of many of the MDs there, *you* will be the expert, even if you don't feel like it. If that makes you uncomfortable, personally, I fall back on what I know and try not to speculate on what I do not. One of the most eye-opening experiences I have had in grad school was at a conference outside of my major domain of study. I went with my advisor and two other faculty--each are very respected in their domains. During a particular session, I felt like an idiot because I just could NOT understand what was being presented. After the session, all four of us got together and they all felt the same way. The moral of the story being that it's okay not to know everything and everything, there is *always* more to learn. The main purpose for virtually all conferences is to share your knowledge with others. If we already knew everything going it, these conferences would just be an expensive, multi-day happy hour.
0
325
12
i9taxd
askacademia_train
0.92
imposter syndrome is a blast Can we talk about imposter syndrome and navigating academia in STEM as a young woman? I feel drastically under-qualified doing nearly everything my mentors encourage me to do. I do the things anyway, but the discomfort doesn't seem to dissipate the further I get. ​ But also, I am a second year grad student, highest degree BA, presenting at a medical conference in November, presenting among all other MDs. How the fuck am I supposed to feel about this D:
g1hdcqd
g1hg8bz
1,597,437,258
1,597,438,537
7
25
I have a theory that imposter syndrome is closely related to your cultural background, and the kind of representation that academics had in art during your formative years.
I wholeheartedly empathize. I am nearing the end of my PhD, several papers published, and I am still convinced my PI is going to figure out that I'm a fraud and I was just lucky the whole time. It doesn't get much better, but you do gain direct experiences that help squash the feelings (I have a paper published! I presented at a big conference! This scientist I admire didn't rip me a new one during q & a! etc). Good luck at your conference; you're going to do great! ETA: Also, later in your career, getting a new person you can mentor yourself is a big confidence boost, especially when you can answer their questions/assist them in their studies/etc.
0
1,279
3.571429
i9taxd
askacademia_train
0.92
imposter syndrome is a blast Can we talk about imposter syndrome and navigating academia in STEM as a young woman? I feel drastically under-qualified doing nearly everything my mentors encourage me to do. I do the things anyway, but the discomfort doesn't seem to dissipate the further I get. ​ But also, I am a second year grad student, highest degree BA, presenting at a medical conference in November, presenting among all other MDs. How the fuck am I supposed to feel about this D:
g1hjrik
g1hi3tg
1,597,440,228
1,597,439,424
17
10
I finished my PhD in 2017 and have been an Assistant Professor since but I still have imposter syndrome. I’m not even comfortable when people call me Dr. ... It will take time but keep doing your best
Fake it til you make it. The beauty of science is that you're often doing things people haven't done before and it's acceptable to say you don't know if you don't know something or you need to look it up.
1
804
1.7
i9taxd
askacademia_train
0.92
imposter syndrome is a blast Can we talk about imposter syndrome and navigating academia in STEM as a young woman? I feel drastically under-qualified doing nearly everything my mentors encourage me to do. I do the things anyway, but the discomfort doesn't seem to dissipate the further I get. ​ But also, I am a second year grad student, highest degree BA, presenting at a medical conference in November, presenting among all other MDs. How the fuck am I supposed to feel about this D:
g1hdcqd
g1hjrik
1,597,437,258
1,597,440,228
7
17
I have a theory that imposter syndrome is closely related to your cultural background, and the kind of representation that academics had in art during your formative years.
I finished my PhD in 2017 and have been an Assistant Professor since but I still have imposter syndrome. I’m not even comfortable when people call me Dr. ... It will take time but keep doing your best
0
2,970
2.428571
i9taxd
askacademia_train
0.92
imposter syndrome is a blast Can we talk about imposter syndrome and navigating academia in STEM as a young woman? I feel drastically under-qualified doing nearly everything my mentors encourage me to do. I do the things anyway, but the discomfort doesn't seem to dissipate the further I get. ​ But also, I am a second year grad student, highest degree BA, presenting at a medical conference in November, presenting among all other MDs. How the fuck am I supposed to feel about this D:
g1hjrik
g1hjr00
1,597,440,228
1,597,440,221
17
6
I finished my PhD in 2017 and have been an Assistant Professor since but I still have imposter syndrome. I’m not even comfortable when people call me Dr. ... It will take time but keep doing your best
It's not 'you vs curriculum' anymore, it's 'you vs god'. We're all unqualified. Finishing your degree isnt about not feeling this way, it's about doing exactly what you're doing. Pushing forward despite the emotional trauma. As for speaking, if you've done something someone else hasnt done, then you have something to say. There may or may not be pushback, but saying stuff to other smart people is the job. No one is gonna beat you up afterwards, so just do the best job you can, sit down, feel like shit, second guess, and repeat until you graduate. I hate to put it this way, but fuck your feelings. They're a shit barometer of how you're actually doing. Unless you get fired, you're doing fine.
1
7
2.833333
i9taxd
askacademia_train
0.92
imposter syndrome is a blast Can we talk about imposter syndrome and navigating academia in STEM as a young woman? I feel drastically under-qualified doing nearly everything my mentors encourage me to do. I do the things anyway, but the discomfort doesn't seem to dissipate the further I get. ​ But also, I am a second year grad student, highest degree BA, presenting at a medical conference in November, presenting among all other MDs. How the fuck am I supposed to feel about this D:
g1hi3tg
g1hdcqd
1,597,439,424
1,597,437,258
10
7
Fake it til you make it. The beauty of science is that you're often doing things people haven't done before and it's acceptable to say you don't know if you don't know something or you need to look it up.
I have a theory that imposter syndrome is closely related to your cultural background, and the kind of representation that academics had in art during your formative years.
1
2,166
1.428571
i9taxd
askacademia_train
0.92
imposter syndrome is a blast Can we talk about imposter syndrome and navigating academia in STEM as a young woman? I feel drastically under-qualified doing nearly everything my mentors encourage me to do. I do the things anyway, but the discomfort doesn't seem to dissipate the further I get. ​ But also, I am a second year grad student, highest degree BA, presenting at a medical conference in November, presenting among all other MDs. How the fuck am I supposed to feel about this D:
g1hdcqd
g1icyr5
1,597,437,258
1,597,455,836
7
8
I have a theory that imposter syndrome is closely related to your cultural background, and the kind of representation that academics had in art during your formative years.
Two things I learned in school and the workforce really helped me out. 1.) A professor telling me to not let the perfect be the enemy of the good. 2.) A supervisor telling me that science is a process, and a team effort, and that I needed to accept that I would make mistakes, and my team would help me fix them. I've learned that just accepting that I may not be comfortable doing something, whether because I don't think I can do it, or am qualified to do it, leads to me learning far more than only doing that which I know I can do well. Or, as Ms. Frizzle would say, "Take chances, make mistakes, get messy!"
0
18,578
1.142857
i9taxd
askacademia_train
0.92
imposter syndrome is a blast Can we talk about imposter syndrome and navigating academia in STEM as a young woman? I feel drastically under-qualified doing nearly everything my mentors encourage me to do. I do the things anyway, but the discomfort doesn't seem to dissipate the further I get. ​ But also, I am a second year grad student, highest degree BA, presenting at a medical conference in November, presenting among all other MDs. How the fuck am I supposed to feel about this D:
g1icyr5
g1hnhlu
1,597,455,836
1,597,442,053
8
6
Two things I learned in school and the workforce really helped me out. 1.) A professor telling me to not let the perfect be the enemy of the good. 2.) A supervisor telling me that science is a process, and a team effort, and that I needed to accept that I would make mistakes, and my team would help me fix them. I've learned that just accepting that I may not be comfortable doing something, whether because I don't think I can do it, or am qualified to do it, leads to me learning far more than only doing that which I know I can do well. Or, as Ms. Frizzle would say, "Take chances, make mistakes, get messy!"
Yeah I graduated with my PhD and I still feel very under qualified. I keep thinking : joke is on them. Despite being so unqualified I keep getting hired to do all these cool things.
1
13,783
1.333333
i9taxd
askacademia_train
0.92
imposter syndrome is a blast Can we talk about imposter syndrome and navigating academia in STEM as a young woman? I feel drastically under-qualified doing nearly everything my mentors encourage me to do. I do the things anyway, but the discomfort doesn't seem to dissipate the further I get. ​ But also, I am a second year grad student, highest degree BA, presenting at a medical conference in November, presenting among all other MDs. How the fuck am I supposed to feel about this D:
g1icyr5
g1hjr00
1,597,455,836
1,597,440,221
8
6
Two things I learned in school and the workforce really helped me out. 1.) A professor telling me to not let the perfect be the enemy of the good. 2.) A supervisor telling me that science is a process, and a team effort, and that I needed to accept that I would make mistakes, and my team would help me fix them. I've learned that just accepting that I may not be comfortable doing something, whether because I don't think I can do it, or am qualified to do it, leads to me learning far more than only doing that which I know I can do well. Or, as Ms. Frizzle would say, "Take chances, make mistakes, get messy!"
It's not 'you vs curriculum' anymore, it's 'you vs god'. We're all unqualified. Finishing your degree isnt about not feeling this way, it's about doing exactly what you're doing. Pushing forward despite the emotional trauma. As for speaking, if you've done something someone else hasnt done, then you have something to say. There may or may not be pushback, but saying stuff to other smart people is the job. No one is gonna beat you up afterwards, so just do the best job you can, sit down, feel like shit, second guess, and repeat until you graduate. I hate to put it this way, but fuck your feelings. They're a shit barometer of how you're actually doing. Unless you get fired, you're doing fine.
1
15,615
1.333333
i9taxd
askacademia_train
0.92
imposter syndrome is a blast Can we talk about imposter syndrome and navigating academia in STEM as a young woman? I feel drastically under-qualified doing nearly everything my mentors encourage me to do. I do the things anyway, but the discomfort doesn't seem to dissipate the further I get. ​ But also, I am a second year grad student, highest degree BA, presenting at a medical conference in November, presenting among all other MDs. How the fuck am I supposed to feel about this D:
g1icyr5
g1hkqwu
1,597,455,836
1,597,440,705
8
5
Two things I learned in school and the workforce really helped me out. 1.) A professor telling me to not let the perfect be the enemy of the good. 2.) A supervisor telling me that science is a process, and a team effort, and that I needed to accept that I would make mistakes, and my team would help me fix them. I've learned that just accepting that I may not be comfortable doing something, whether because I don't think I can do it, or am qualified to do it, leads to me learning far more than only doing that which I know I can do well. Or, as Ms. Frizzle would say, "Take chances, make mistakes, get messy!"
Is this your first conference presentation?! If so congrats! Once you get over the nerves everyone has, it can be really fun and rewarding. Everyone is nervous and apprehensive before their first (several) conference presentations; I still get so nervous during conference presentations that I talk 8,000 miles a minute. Imposter syndrome is always going to be there. I was applying to TT jobs this time last year and reading the admission requirements for the Master's program at a department I was applying to. And I caught myself thinking, "Oh gosh, I'm not sure I can get into this program..." and I felt really intimidated for several minutes, until I snapped out of it and realized I already have a masters degree (and a PhD and have done 2 post-docs) and that I was being RIDICULOUS. It just never goes away! The only way to gain experience is by DOING, and that's what I remind myself all the time. If I let my imposter syndrome get the best of me I won't ever DO anything, and then I really won't have the right experience. Participate as much as you can, learn from as many people as you can, and remind yourself that WE ALL feel the same insufficiencies.
1
15,131
1.6
i9taxd
askacademia_train
0.92
imposter syndrome is a blast Can we talk about imposter syndrome and navigating academia in STEM as a young woman? I feel drastically under-qualified doing nearly everything my mentors encourage me to do. I do the things anyway, but the discomfort doesn't seem to dissipate the further I get. ​ But also, I am a second year grad student, highest degree BA, presenting at a medical conference in November, presenting among all other MDs. How the fuck am I supposed to feel about this D:
g1icyr5
g1htt9g
1,597,455,836
1,597,445,295
8
5
Two things I learned in school and the workforce really helped me out. 1.) A professor telling me to not let the perfect be the enemy of the good. 2.) A supervisor telling me that science is a process, and a team effort, and that I needed to accept that I would make mistakes, and my team would help me fix them. I've learned that just accepting that I may not be comfortable doing something, whether because I don't think I can do it, or am qualified to do it, leads to me learning far more than only doing that which I know I can do well. Or, as Ms. Frizzle would say, "Take chances, make mistakes, get messy!"
Just in case it helps to hear about others' experiences, check out this article: Common Academic Experiences
1
10,541
1.6
i9taxd
askacademia_train
0.92
imposter syndrome is a blast Can we talk about imposter syndrome and navigating academia in STEM as a young woman? I feel drastically under-qualified doing nearly everything my mentors encourage me to do. I do the things anyway, but the discomfort doesn't seem to dissipate the further I get. ​ But also, I am a second year grad student, highest degree BA, presenting at a medical conference in November, presenting among all other MDs. How the fuck am I supposed to feel about this D:
g1icyr5
g1hm7i6
1,597,455,836
1,597,441,424
8
4
Two things I learned in school and the workforce really helped me out. 1.) A professor telling me to not let the perfect be the enemy of the good. 2.) A supervisor telling me that science is a process, and a team effort, and that I needed to accept that I would make mistakes, and my team would help me fix them. I've learned that just accepting that I may not be comfortable doing something, whether because I don't think I can do it, or am qualified to do it, leads to me learning far more than only doing that which I know I can do well. Or, as Ms. Frizzle would say, "Take chances, make mistakes, get messy!"
Remember that you know more about your own research than anyone else, and it is worth sharing. It does seem that imposter syndrome never goes away, though. I just started a postdoc and boy is it hitting me hard.
1
14,412
2
i9taxd
askacademia_train
0.92
imposter syndrome is a blast Can we talk about imposter syndrome and navigating academia in STEM as a young woman? I feel drastically under-qualified doing nearly everything my mentors encourage me to do. I do the things anyway, but the discomfort doesn't seem to dissipate the further I get. ​ But also, I am a second year grad student, highest degree BA, presenting at a medical conference in November, presenting among all other MDs. How the fuck am I supposed to feel about this D:
g1hv2rc
g1icyr5
1,597,445,955
1,597,455,836
3
8
I think there is a way to mitigate impostor syndrome. And, that is to understand that everyone around you is awesome. And, they know more about some stuff then you do. But, you are also awesome. You are qualified. There is now way you tricked your mentors into thinking you were awesome. They are recommending you to do this stuff because they work closely with you and know you are qualified to do it. Take home message, you will never know everything everyone else knows. But, that is not the purpose of your work. You need to know the work you did, and you do. But, it is ok to not know everything about your work. ​ You will do well. Have faith, You deserve to be where you are.
Two things I learned in school and the workforce really helped me out. 1.) A professor telling me to not let the perfect be the enemy of the good. 2.) A supervisor telling me that science is a process, and a team effort, and that I needed to accept that I would make mistakes, and my team would help me fix them. I've learned that just accepting that I may not be comfortable doing something, whether because I don't think I can do it, or am qualified to do it, leads to me learning far more than only doing that which I know I can do well. Or, as Ms. Frizzle would say, "Take chances, make mistakes, get messy!"
0
9,881
2.666667
i9taxd
askacademia_train
0.92
imposter syndrome is a blast Can we talk about imposter syndrome and navigating academia in STEM as a young woman? I feel drastically under-qualified doing nearly everything my mentors encourage me to do. I do the things anyway, but the discomfort doesn't seem to dissipate the further I get. ​ But also, I am a second year grad student, highest degree BA, presenting at a medical conference in November, presenting among all other MDs. How the fuck am I supposed to feel about this D:
g1icyr5
g1htqih
1,597,455,836
1,597,445,255
8
3
Two things I learned in school and the workforce really helped me out. 1.) A professor telling me to not let the perfect be the enemy of the good. 2.) A supervisor telling me that science is a process, and a team effort, and that I needed to accept that I would make mistakes, and my team would help me fix them. I've learned that just accepting that I may not be comfortable doing something, whether because I don't think I can do it, or am qualified to do it, leads to me learning far more than only doing that which I know I can do well. Or, as Ms. Frizzle would say, "Take chances, make mistakes, get messy!"
I am a master's student and have 3 publications yet I feel dumb on a daily basis especially when I foolishly try something in the lab that doesn't work which my supervisors already told me wouldn't work, or pretend to understand X-Ray crystallography data when I don't and tbh, it is difficult even for experienced people especially when dealing with something they haven't seen before. To some extent I believe it has to do with the power dynamic working in research groups. A hierarchy exists and there will always be much more smarter people in your group and much more experienced. Every stupid idea that one may come up with will have been thrown to the trash by the much more experienced people in the group and sharing ideas feels a big deal in group meetings as you fear being coming out as utter dumb in front of the biggies. So it is natural to doubt your own abilities. But as someone else also commented, you know your work better than anyone. Own it. I always find it easy to convey my work as a story. You may not recognize but always coming out as perfect is not the most ideal way rather research is about learning and storytelling is crucial when presenting your work. The parts you struggled with, how you overcame those, a bit of humor here and there always helps. Of course you need to know about your work but never let that get to your head as if that's the only thing that matters. One great thing about discussing your work with others is that may point out something very trivial that you may have missed and help you channelize your work better.
1
10,581
2.666667
i9taxd
askacademia_train
0.92
imposter syndrome is a blast Can we talk about imposter syndrome and navigating academia in STEM as a young woman? I feel drastically under-qualified doing nearly everything my mentors encourage me to do. I do the things anyway, but the discomfort doesn't seem to dissipate the further I get. ​ But also, I am a second year grad student, highest degree BA, presenting at a medical conference in November, presenting among all other MDs. How the fuck am I supposed to feel about this D:
g1hmoow
g1icyr5
1,597,441,657
1,597,455,836
2
8
It helped me when I realised that my professors didn't know everything. Even when they seemed to have an answer for everything, eventually I realised just how often they were bluffing a bit. Made me feel like it's OK not to know everything, or that there's strength in admitting "I'm not sure, but I can look it up/ ask someone who would know/ point you in the right direction"
Two things I learned in school and the workforce really helped me out. 1.) A professor telling me to not let the perfect be the enemy of the good. 2.) A supervisor telling me that science is a process, and a team effort, and that I needed to accept that I would make mistakes, and my team would help me fix them. I've learned that just accepting that I may not be comfortable doing something, whether because I don't think I can do it, or am qualified to do it, leads to me learning far more than only doing that which I know I can do well. Or, as Ms. Frizzle would say, "Take chances, make mistakes, get messy!"
0
14,179
4
i9taxd
askacademia_train
0.92
imposter syndrome is a blast Can we talk about imposter syndrome and navigating academia in STEM as a young woman? I feel drastically under-qualified doing nearly everything my mentors encourage me to do. I do the things anyway, but the discomfort doesn't seem to dissipate the further I get. ​ But also, I am a second year grad student, highest degree BA, presenting at a medical conference in November, presenting among all other MDs. How the fuck am I supposed to feel about this D:
g1icyr5
g1i59tm
1,597,455,836
1,597,451,450
8
2
Two things I learned in school and the workforce really helped me out. 1.) A professor telling me to not let the perfect be the enemy of the good. 2.) A supervisor telling me that science is a process, and a team effort, and that I needed to accept that I would make mistakes, and my team would help me fix them. I've learned that just accepting that I may not be comfortable doing something, whether because I don't think I can do it, or am qualified to do it, leads to me learning far more than only doing that which I know I can do well. Or, as Ms. Frizzle would say, "Take chances, make mistakes, get messy!"
Not in the same STEM field but I felt like I just read something I wrote. It fucking sucks man!!! Sending ya love and encouragement!!
1
4,386
4
i9taxd
askacademia_train
0.92
imposter syndrome is a blast Can we talk about imposter syndrome and navigating academia in STEM as a young woman? I feel drastically under-qualified doing nearly everything my mentors encourage me to do. I do the things anyway, but the discomfort doesn't seem to dissipate the further I get. ​ But also, I am a second year grad student, highest degree BA, presenting at a medical conference in November, presenting among all other MDs. How the fuck am I supposed to feel about this D:
g1hkqwu
g1hnhlu
1,597,440,705
1,597,442,053
5
6
Is this your first conference presentation?! If so congrats! Once you get over the nerves everyone has, it can be really fun and rewarding. Everyone is nervous and apprehensive before their first (several) conference presentations; I still get so nervous during conference presentations that I talk 8,000 miles a minute. Imposter syndrome is always going to be there. I was applying to TT jobs this time last year and reading the admission requirements for the Master's program at a department I was applying to. And I caught myself thinking, "Oh gosh, I'm not sure I can get into this program..." and I felt really intimidated for several minutes, until I snapped out of it and realized I already have a masters degree (and a PhD and have done 2 post-docs) and that I was being RIDICULOUS. It just never goes away! The only way to gain experience is by DOING, and that's what I remind myself all the time. If I let my imposter syndrome get the best of me I won't ever DO anything, and then I really won't have the right experience. Participate as much as you can, learn from as many people as you can, and remind yourself that WE ALL feel the same insufficiencies.
Yeah I graduated with my PhD and I still feel very under qualified. I keep thinking : joke is on them. Despite being so unqualified I keep getting hired to do all these cool things.
0
1,348
1.2
i9taxd
askacademia_train
0.92
imposter syndrome is a blast Can we talk about imposter syndrome and navigating academia in STEM as a young woman? I feel drastically under-qualified doing nearly everything my mentors encourage me to do. I do the things anyway, but the discomfort doesn't seem to dissipate the further I get. ​ But also, I am a second year grad student, highest degree BA, presenting at a medical conference in November, presenting among all other MDs. How the fuck am I supposed to feel about this D:
g1hm7i6
g1hnhlu
1,597,441,424
1,597,442,053
4
6
Remember that you know more about your own research than anyone else, and it is worth sharing. It does seem that imposter syndrome never goes away, though. I just started a postdoc and boy is it hitting me hard.
Yeah I graduated with my PhD and I still feel very under qualified. I keep thinking : joke is on them. Despite being so unqualified I keep getting hired to do all these cool things.
0
629
1.5
i9taxd
askacademia_train
0.92
imposter syndrome is a blast Can we talk about imposter syndrome and navigating academia in STEM as a young woman? I feel drastically under-qualified doing nearly everything my mentors encourage me to do. I do the things anyway, but the discomfort doesn't seem to dissipate the further I get. ​ But also, I am a second year grad student, highest degree BA, presenting at a medical conference in November, presenting among all other MDs. How the fuck am I supposed to feel about this D:
g1hnhlu
g1hmoow
1,597,442,053
1,597,441,657
6
2
Yeah I graduated with my PhD and I still feel very under qualified. I keep thinking : joke is on them. Despite being so unqualified I keep getting hired to do all these cool things.
It helped me when I realised that my professors didn't know everything. Even when they seemed to have an answer for everything, eventually I realised just how often they were bluffing a bit. Made me feel like it's OK not to know everything, or that there's strength in admitting "I'm not sure, but I can look it up/ ask someone who would know/ point you in the right direction"
1
396
3
i9taxd
askacademia_train
0.92
imposter syndrome is a blast Can we talk about imposter syndrome and navigating academia in STEM as a young woman? I feel drastically under-qualified doing nearly everything my mentors encourage me to do. I do the things anyway, but the discomfort doesn't seem to dissipate the further I get. ​ But also, I am a second year grad student, highest degree BA, presenting at a medical conference in November, presenting among all other MDs. How the fuck am I supposed to feel about this D:
g1irdcu
g1hkqwu
1,597,463,595
1,597,440,705
6
5
Good news - it's not going away! I just got tenure and I still feel it. For me a big issue is perfectionism - if it wasn't for deadlines I would constantly revise everything I do. Impostor syndrome feeds on your thoughts of how improvements could be made. It can be a very useful self-editing tool, but balancing self-confidence and impostor syndrome is one of the nuances of being a young woman in academia* *source: personal experience, part of which makes me feel as though I should cite all definitive statements
Is this your first conference presentation?! If so congrats! Once you get over the nerves everyone has, it can be really fun and rewarding. Everyone is nervous and apprehensive before their first (several) conference presentations; I still get so nervous during conference presentations that I talk 8,000 miles a minute. Imposter syndrome is always going to be there. I was applying to TT jobs this time last year and reading the admission requirements for the Master's program at a department I was applying to. And I caught myself thinking, "Oh gosh, I'm not sure I can get into this program..." and I felt really intimidated for several minutes, until I snapped out of it and realized I already have a masters degree (and a PhD and have done 2 post-docs) and that I was being RIDICULOUS. It just never goes away! The only way to gain experience is by DOING, and that's what I remind myself all the time. If I let my imposter syndrome get the best of me I won't ever DO anything, and then I really won't have the right experience. Participate as much as you can, learn from as many people as you can, and remind yourself that WE ALL feel the same insufficiencies.
1
22,890
1.2
i9taxd
askacademia_train
0.92
imposter syndrome is a blast Can we talk about imposter syndrome and navigating academia in STEM as a young woman? I feel drastically under-qualified doing nearly everything my mentors encourage me to do. I do the things anyway, but the discomfort doesn't seem to dissipate the further I get. ​ But also, I am a second year grad student, highest degree BA, presenting at a medical conference in November, presenting among all other MDs. How the fuck am I supposed to feel about this D:
g1htt9g
g1irdcu
1,597,445,295
1,597,463,595
5
6
Just in case it helps to hear about others' experiences, check out this article: Common Academic Experiences
Good news - it's not going away! I just got tenure and I still feel it. For me a big issue is perfectionism - if it wasn't for deadlines I would constantly revise everything I do. Impostor syndrome feeds on your thoughts of how improvements could be made. It can be a very useful self-editing tool, but balancing self-confidence and impostor syndrome is one of the nuances of being a young woman in academia* *source: personal experience, part of which makes me feel as though I should cite all definitive statements
0
18,300
1.2
i9taxd
askacademia_train
0.92
imposter syndrome is a blast Can we talk about imposter syndrome and navigating academia in STEM as a young woman? I feel drastically under-qualified doing nearly everything my mentors encourage me to do. I do the things anyway, but the discomfort doesn't seem to dissipate the further I get. ​ But also, I am a second year grad student, highest degree BA, presenting at a medical conference in November, presenting among all other MDs. How the fuck am I supposed to feel about this D:
g1irdcu
g1hm7i6
1,597,463,595
1,597,441,424
6
4
Good news - it's not going away! I just got tenure and I still feel it. For me a big issue is perfectionism - if it wasn't for deadlines I would constantly revise everything I do. Impostor syndrome feeds on your thoughts of how improvements could be made. It can be a very useful self-editing tool, but balancing self-confidence and impostor syndrome is one of the nuances of being a young woman in academia* *source: personal experience, part of which makes me feel as though I should cite all definitive statements
Remember that you know more about your own research than anyone else, and it is worth sharing. It does seem that imposter syndrome never goes away, though. I just started a postdoc and boy is it hitting me hard.
1
22,171
1.5
i9taxd
askacademia_train
0.92
imposter syndrome is a blast Can we talk about imposter syndrome and navigating academia in STEM as a young woman? I feel drastically under-qualified doing nearly everything my mentors encourage me to do. I do the things anyway, but the discomfort doesn't seem to dissipate the further I get. ​ But also, I am a second year grad student, highest degree BA, presenting at a medical conference in November, presenting among all other MDs. How the fuck am I supposed to feel about this D:
g1hv2rc
g1irdcu
1,597,445,955
1,597,463,595
3
6
I think there is a way to mitigate impostor syndrome. And, that is to understand that everyone around you is awesome. And, they know more about some stuff then you do. But, you are also awesome. You are qualified. There is now way you tricked your mentors into thinking you were awesome. They are recommending you to do this stuff because they work closely with you and know you are qualified to do it. Take home message, you will never know everything everyone else knows. But, that is not the purpose of your work. You need to know the work you did, and you do. But, it is ok to not know everything about your work. ​ You will do well. Have faith, You deserve to be where you are.
Good news - it's not going away! I just got tenure and I still feel it. For me a big issue is perfectionism - if it wasn't for deadlines I would constantly revise everything I do. Impostor syndrome feeds on your thoughts of how improvements could be made. It can be a very useful self-editing tool, but balancing self-confidence and impostor syndrome is one of the nuances of being a young woman in academia* *source: personal experience, part of which makes me feel as though I should cite all definitive statements
0
17,640
2
i9taxd
askacademia_train
0.92
imposter syndrome is a blast Can we talk about imposter syndrome and navigating academia in STEM as a young woman? I feel drastically under-qualified doing nearly everything my mentors encourage me to do. I do the things anyway, but the discomfort doesn't seem to dissipate the further I get. ​ But also, I am a second year grad student, highest degree BA, presenting at a medical conference in November, presenting among all other MDs. How the fuck am I supposed to feel about this D:
g1htqih
g1irdcu
1,597,445,255
1,597,463,595
3
6
I am a master's student and have 3 publications yet I feel dumb on a daily basis especially when I foolishly try something in the lab that doesn't work which my supervisors already told me wouldn't work, or pretend to understand X-Ray crystallography data when I don't and tbh, it is difficult even for experienced people especially when dealing with something they haven't seen before. To some extent I believe it has to do with the power dynamic working in research groups. A hierarchy exists and there will always be much more smarter people in your group and much more experienced. Every stupid idea that one may come up with will have been thrown to the trash by the much more experienced people in the group and sharing ideas feels a big deal in group meetings as you fear being coming out as utter dumb in front of the biggies. So it is natural to doubt your own abilities. But as someone else also commented, you know your work better than anyone. Own it. I always find it easy to convey my work as a story. You may not recognize but always coming out as perfect is not the most ideal way rather research is about learning and storytelling is crucial when presenting your work. The parts you struggled with, how you overcame those, a bit of humor here and there always helps. Of course you need to know about your work but never let that get to your head as if that's the only thing that matters. One great thing about discussing your work with others is that may point out something very trivial that you may have missed and help you channelize your work better.
Good news - it's not going away! I just got tenure and I still feel it. For me a big issue is perfectionism - if it wasn't for deadlines I would constantly revise everything I do. Impostor syndrome feeds on your thoughts of how improvements could be made. It can be a very useful self-editing tool, but balancing self-confidence and impostor syndrome is one of the nuances of being a young woman in academia* *source: personal experience, part of which makes me feel as though I should cite all definitive statements
0
18,340
2