premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Quinn is depressed.
Lambert is depressed.
Sherwin is not red.
Sherwin is enchanting.
Lambert is not enchanting.
Quinn is red.
Lee is not red.
Lambert is round.
Lambert is smoggy.
Sherwin is not depressed.
Lee is not impossible.
Chrysta is depressed.Someone is impossible and not depressed if and only if he is red and smoggy.
Aldis being not round and Lee being enchanting imply that Sherwin is depressed.
If Lambert is not red, then Aldis is not enchanting, and vice versa.
If someone is smoggy and round, then he is both red and depressed, and vice versa.
Sheridan being enchanting or Sheridan being red implies that Sherwin is not depressed.
Someone is not smoggy and depressed if and only if he is red.
It can be concluded that Lee is enchanting and Sheridan is depressed once knowing that Chrysta is round.
If someone is not round, then he is not enchanting.
Lambert is enchanting if and only if Sherwin is not red.
If someone is impossible, then he is both smoggy and not depressed.
If all people are depressed or smoggy, then Sherwin is not red.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not enchanting once knowing that Quinn is smoggy.
|
Lee is not round.
|
neutral
|
Quinn is depressed.
Lambert is depressed.
Sherwin is not red.
Sherwin is enchanting.
Lambert is not enchanting.
Quinn is red.
Lee is not red.
Lambert is round.
Lambert is smoggy.
Sherwin is not depressed.
Lee is not impossible.
Chrysta is depressed.Someone is impossible and not depressed if and only if he is red and smoggy.
Aldis being not round and Lee being enchanting imply that Sherwin is depressed.
If Lambert is not red, then Aldis is not enchanting, and vice versa.
If someone is smoggy and round, then he is both red and depressed, and vice versa.
Sheridan being enchanting or Sheridan being red implies that Sherwin is not depressed.
Someone is not smoggy and depressed if and only if he is red.
It can be concluded that Lee is enchanting and Sheridan is depressed once knowing that Chrysta is round.
If someone is not round, then he is not enchanting.
Lambert is enchanting if and only if Sherwin is not red.
If someone is impossible, then he is both smoggy and not depressed.
If all people are depressed or smoggy, then Sherwin is not red.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not enchanting once knowing that Quinn is smoggy.
|
Lee is not smoggy.
|
neutral
|
Quinn is depressed.
Lambert is depressed.
Sherwin is not red.
Sherwin is enchanting.
Lambert is not enchanting.
Quinn is red.
Lee is not red.
Lambert is round.
Lambert is smoggy.
Sherwin is not depressed.
Lee is not impossible.
Chrysta is depressed.Someone is impossible and not depressed if and only if he is red and smoggy.
Aldis being not round and Lee being enchanting imply that Sherwin is depressed.
If Lambert is not red, then Aldis is not enchanting, and vice versa.
If someone is smoggy and round, then he is both red and depressed, and vice versa.
Sheridan being enchanting or Sheridan being red implies that Sherwin is not depressed.
Someone is not smoggy and depressed if and only if he is red.
It can be concluded that Lee is enchanting and Sheridan is depressed once knowing that Chrysta is round.
If someone is not round, then he is not enchanting.
Lambert is enchanting if and only if Sherwin is not red.
If someone is impossible, then he is both smoggy and not depressed.
If all people are depressed or smoggy, then Sherwin is not red.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not enchanting once knowing that Quinn is smoggy.
|
Lambert is not round.
|
contradiction
|
Quinn is depressed.
Lambert is depressed.
Sherwin is not red.
Sherwin is enchanting.
Lambert is not enchanting.
Quinn is red.
Lee is not red.
Lambert is round.
Lambert is smoggy.
Sherwin is not depressed.
Lee is not impossible.
Chrysta is depressed.Someone is impossible and not depressed if and only if he is red and smoggy.
Aldis being not round and Lee being enchanting imply that Sherwin is depressed.
If Lambert is not red, then Aldis is not enchanting, and vice versa.
If someone is smoggy and round, then he is both red and depressed, and vice versa.
Sheridan being enchanting or Sheridan being red implies that Sherwin is not depressed.
Someone is not smoggy and depressed if and only if he is red.
It can be concluded that Lee is enchanting and Sheridan is depressed once knowing that Chrysta is round.
If someone is not round, then he is not enchanting.
Lambert is enchanting if and only if Sherwin is not red.
If someone is impossible, then he is both smoggy and not depressed.
If all people are depressed or smoggy, then Sherwin is not red.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not enchanting once knowing that Quinn is smoggy.
|
Lambert is not smoggy.
|
self_contradiction
|
Quinn is depressed.
Lambert is depressed.
Sherwin is not red.
Sherwin is enchanting.
Lambert is not enchanting.
Quinn is red.
Lee is not red.
Lambert is round.
Lambert is smoggy.
Sherwin is not depressed.
Lee is not impossible.
Chrysta is depressed.Someone is impossible and not depressed if and only if he is red and smoggy.
Aldis being not round and Lee being enchanting imply that Sherwin is depressed.
If Lambert is not red, then Aldis is not enchanting, and vice versa.
If someone is smoggy and round, then he is both red and depressed, and vice versa.
Sheridan being enchanting or Sheridan being red implies that Sherwin is not depressed.
Someone is not smoggy and depressed if and only if he is red.
It can be concluded that Lee is enchanting and Sheridan is depressed once knowing that Chrysta is round.
If someone is not round, then he is not enchanting.
Lambert is enchanting if and only if Sherwin is not red.
If someone is impossible, then he is both smoggy and not depressed.
If all people are depressed or smoggy, then Sherwin is not red.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not enchanting once knowing that Quinn is smoggy.
|
Sherwin is not enchanting.
|
contradiction
|
Quinn is depressed.
Lambert is depressed.
Sherwin is not red.
Sherwin is enchanting.
Lambert is not enchanting.
Quinn is red.
Lee is not red.
Lambert is round.
Lambert is smoggy.
Sherwin is not depressed.
Lee is not impossible.
Chrysta is depressed.Someone is impossible and not depressed if and only if he is red and smoggy.
Aldis being not round and Lee being enchanting imply that Sherwin is depressed.
If Lambert is not red, then Aldis is not enchanting, and vice versa.
If someone is smoggy and round, then he is both red and depressed, and vice versa.
Sheridan being enchanting or Sheridan being red implies that Sherwin is not depressed.
Someone is not smoggy and depressed if and only if he is red.
It can be concluded that Lee is enchanting and Sheridan is depressed once knowing that Chrysta is round.
If someone is not round, then he is not enchanting.
Lambert is enchanting if and only if Sherwin is not red.
If someone is impossible, then he is both smoggy and not depressed.
If all people are depressed or smoggy, then Sherwin is not red.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not enchanting once knowing that Quinn is smoggy.
|
Quinn is impossible.
|
entailment
|
Quinn is depressed.
Lambert is depressed.
Sherwin is not red.
Sherwin is enchanting.
Lambert is not enchanting.
Quinn is red.
Lee is not red.
Lambert is round.
Lambert is smoggy.
Sherwin is not depressed.
Lee is not impossible.
Chrysta is depressed.Someone is impossible and not depressed if and only if he is red and smoggy.
Aldis being not round and Lee being enchanting imply that Sherwin is depressed.
If Lambert is not red, then Aldis is not enchanting, and vice versa.
If someone is smoggy and round, then he is both red and depressed, and vice versa.
Sheridan being enchanting or Sheridan being red implies that Sherwin is not depressed.
Someone is not smoggy and depressed if and only if he is red.
It can be concluded that Lee is enchanting and Sheridan is depressed once knowing that Chrysta is round.
If someone is not round, then he is not enchanting.
Lambert is enchanting if and only if Sherwin is not red.
If someone is impossible, then he is both smoggy and not depressed.
If all people are depressed or smoggy, then Sherwin is not red.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not enchanting once knowing that Quinn is smoggy.
|
Sherwin is impossible.
|
neutral
|
Quinn is depressed.
Lambert is depressed.
Sherwin is not red.
Sherwin is enchanting.
Lambert is not enchanting.
Quinn is red.
Lee is not red.
Lambert is round.
Lambert is smoggy.
Sherwin is not depressed.
Lee is not impossible.
Chrysta is depressed.Someone is impossible and not depressed if and only if he is red and smoggy.
Aldis being not round and Lee being enchanting imply that Sherwin is depressed.
If Lambert is not red, then Aldis is not enchanting, and vice versa.
If someone is smoggy and round, then he is both red and depressed, and vice versa.
Sheridan being enchanting or Sheridan being red implies that Sherwin is not depressed.
Someone is not smoggy and depressed if and only if he is red.
It can be concluded that Lee is enchanting and Sheridan is depressed once knowing that Chrysta is round.
If someone is not round, then he is not enchanting.
Lambert is enchanting if and only if Sherwin is not red.
If someone is impossible, then he is both smoggy and not depressed.
If all people are depressed or smoggy, then Sherwin is not red.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not enchanting once knowing that Quinn is smoggy.
|
Lee is not impossible.
|
entailment
|
Quinn is depressed.
Lambert is depressed.
Sherwin is not red.
Sherwin is enchanting.
Lambert is not enchanting.
Quinn is red.
Lee is not red.
Lambert is round.
Lambert is smoggy.
Sherwin is not depressed.
Lee is not impossible.
Chrysta is depressed.Someone is impossible and not depressed if and only if he is red and smoggy.
Aldis being not round and Lee being enchanting imply that Sherwin is depressed.
If Lambert is not red, then Aldis is not enchanting, and vice versa.
If someone is smoggy and round, then he is both red and depressed, and vice versa.
Sheridan being enchanting or Sheridan being red implies that Sherwin is not depressed.
Someone is not smoggy and depressed if and only if he is red.
It can be concluded that Lee is enchanting and Sheridan is depressed once knowing that Chrysta is round.
If someone is not round, then he is not enchanting.
Lambert is enchanting if and only if Sherwin is not red.
If someone is impossible, then he is both smoggy and not depressed.
If all people are depressed or smoggy, then Sherwin is not red.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not enchanting once knowing that Quinn is smoggy.
|
Lambert is depressed.
|
self_contradiction
|
Quinn is depressed.
Lambert is depressed.
Sherwin is not red.
Sherwin is enchanting.
Lambert is not enchanting.
Quinn is red.
Lee is not red.
Lambert is round.
Lambert is smoggy.
Sherwin is not depressed.
Lee is not impossible.
Chrysta is depressed.Someone is impossible and not depressed if and only if he is red and smoggy.
Aldis being not round and Lee being enchanting imply that Sherwin is depressed.
If Lambert is not red, then Aldis is not enchanting, and vice versa.
If someone is smoggy and round, then he is both red and depressed, and vice versa.
Sheridan being enchanting or Sheridan being red implies that Sherwin is not depressed.
Someone is not smoggy and depressed if and only if he is red.
It can be concluded that Lee is enchanting and Sheridan is depressed once knowing that Chrysta is round.
If someone is not round, then he is not enchanting.
Lambert is enchanting if and only if Sherwin is not red.
If someone is impossible, then he is both smoggy and not depressed.
If all people are depressed or smoggy, then Sherwin is not red.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not enchanting once knowing that Quinn is smoggy.
|
Aldis is smoggy.
|
neutral
|
Quinn is depressed.
Lambert is depressed.
Sherwin is not red.
Sherwin is enchanting.
Lambert is not enchanting.
Quinn is red.
Lee is not red.
Lambert is round.
Lambert is smoggy.
Sherwin is not depressed.
Lee is not impossible.
Chrysta is depressed.Someone is impossible and not depressed if and only if he is red and smoggy.
Aldis being not round and Lee being enchanting imply that Sherwin is depressed.
If Lambert is not red, then Aldis is not enchanting, and vice versa.
If someone is smoggy and round, then he is both red and depressed, and vice versa.
Sheridan being enchanting or Sheridan being red implies that Sherwin is not depressed.
Someone is not smoggy and depressed if and only if he is red.
It can be concluded that Lee is enchanting and Sheridan is depressed once knowing that Chrysta is round.
If someone is not round, then he is not enchanting.
Lambert is enchanting if and only if Sherwin is not red.
If someone is impossible, then he is both smoggy and not depressed.
If all people are depressed or smoggy, then Sherwin is not red.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not enchanting once knowing that Quinn is smoggy.
|
Lee is round.
|
neutral
|
Quinn is depressed.
Lambert is depressed.
Sherwin is not red.
Sherwin is enchanting.
Lambert is not enchanting.
Quinn is red.
Lee is not red.
Lambert is round.
Lambert is smoggy.
Sherwin is not depressed.
Lee is not impossible.
Chrysta is depressed.Someone is impossible and not depressed if and only if he is red and smoggy.
Aldis being not round and Lee being enchanting imply that Sherwin is depressed.
If Lambert is not red, then Aldis is not enchanting, and vice versa.
If someone is smoggy and round, then he is both red and depressed, and vice versa.
Sheridan being enchanting or Sheridan being red implies that Sherwin is not depressed.
Someone is not smoggy and depressed if and only if he is red.
It can be concluded that Lee is enchanting and Sheridan is depressed once knowing that Chrysta is round.
If someone is not round, then he is not enchanting.
Lambert is enchanting if and only if Sherwin is not red.
If someone is impossible, then he is both smoggy and not depressed.
If all people are depressed or smoggy, then Sherwin is not red.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not enchanting once knowing that Quinn is smoggy.
|
Sherwin is not depressed.
|
entailment
|
Quinn is depressed.
Lambert is depressed.
Sherwin is not red.
Sherwin is enchanting.
Lambert is not enchanting.
Quinn is red.
Lee is not red.
Lambert is round.
Lambert is smoggy.
Sherwin is not depressed.
Lee is not impossible.
Chrysta is depressed.Someone is impossible and not depressed if and only if he is red and smoggy.
Aldis being not round and Lee being enchanting imply that Sherwin is depressed.
If Lambert is not red, then Aldis is not enchanting, and vice versa.
If someone is smoggy and round, then he is both red and depressed, and vice versa.
Sheridan being enchanting or Sheridan being red implies that Sherwin is not depressed.
Someone is not smoggy and depressed if and only if he is red.
It can be concluded that Lee is enchanting and Sheridan is depressed once knowing that Chrysta is round.
If someone is not round, then he is not enchanting.
Lambert is enchanting if and only if Sherwin is not red.
If someone is impossible, then he is both smoggy and not depressed.
If all people are depressed or smoggy, then Sherwin is not red.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not enchanting once knowing that Quinn is smoggy.
|
Lambert is impossible.
|
entailment
|
Quinn is depressed.
Lambert is depressed.
Sherwin is not red.
Sherwin is enchanting.
Lambert is not enchanting.
Quinn is red.
Lee is not red.
Lambert is round.
Lambert is smoggy.
Sherwin is not depressed.
Lee is not impossible.
Chrysta is depressed.Someone is impossible and not depressed if and only if he is red and smoggy.
Aldis being not round and Lee being enchanting imply that Sherwin is depressed.
If Lambert is not red, then Aldis is not enchanting, and vice versa.
If someone is smoggy and round, then he is both red and depressed, and vice versa.
Sheridan being enchanting or Sheridan being red implies that Sherwin is not depressed.
Someone is not smoggy and depressed if and only if he is red.
It can be concluded that Lee is enchanting and Sheridan is depressed once knowing that Chrysta is round.
If someone is not round, then he is not enchanting.
Lambert is enchanting if and only if Sherwin is not red.
If someone is impossible, then he is both smoggy and not depressed.
If all people are depressed or smoggy, then Sherwin is not red.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not enchanting once knowing that Quinn is smoggy.
|
Lambert is not enchanting.
|
self_contradiction
|
Quinn is depressed.
Lambert is depressed.
Sherwin is not red.
Sherwin is enchanting.
Lambert is not enchanting.
Quinn is red.
Lee is not red.
Lambert is round.
Lambert is smoggy.
Sherwin is not depressed.
Lee is not impossible.
Chrysta is depressed.Someone is impossible and not depressed if and only if he is red and smoggy.
Aldis being not round and Lee being enchanting imply that Sherwin is depressed.
If Lambert is not red, then Aldis is not enchanting, and vice versa.
If someone is smoggy and round, then he is both red and depressed, and vice versa.
Sheridan being enchanting or Sheridan being red implies that Sherwin is not depressed.
Someone is not smoggy and depressed if and only if he is red.
It can be concluded that Lee is enchanting and Sheridan is depressed once knowing that Chrysta is round.
If someone is not round, then he is not enchanting.
Lambert is enchanting if and only if Sherwin is not red.
If someone is impossible, then he is both smoggy and not depressed.
If all people are depressed or smoggy, then Sherwin is not red.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not enchanting once knowing that Quinn is smoggy.
|
Sherwin is not red.
|
entailment
|
Quinn is depressed.
Lambert is depressed.
Sherwin is not red.
Sherwin is enchanting.
Lambert is not enchanting.
Quinn is red.
Lee is not red.
Lambert is round.
Lambert is smoggy.
Sherwin is not depressed.
Lee is not impossible.
Chrysta is depressed.Someone is impossible and not depressed if and only if he is red and smoggy.
Aldis being not round and Lee being enchanting imply that Sherwin is depressed.
If Lambert is not red, then Aldis is not enchanting, and vice versa.
If someone is smoggy and round, then he is both red and depressed, and vice versa.
Sheridan being enchanting or Sheridan being red implies that Sherwin is not depressed.
Someone is not smoggy and depressed if and only if he is red.
It can be concluded that Lee is enchanting and Sheridan is depressed once knowing that Chrysta is round.
If someone is not round, then he is not enchanting.
Lambert is enchanting if and only if Sherwin is not red.
If someone is impossible, then he is both smoggy and not depressed.
If all people are depressed or smoggy, then Sherwin is not red.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not enchanting once knowing that Quinn is smoggy.
|
Lambert is enchanting.
|
self_contradiction
|
Quinn is depressed.
Lambert is depressed.
Sherwin is not red.
Sherwin is enchanting.
Lambert is not enchanting.
Quinn is red.
Lee is not red.
Lambert is round.
Lambert is smoggy.
Sherwin is not depressed.
Lee is not impossible.
Chrysta is depressed.Someone is impossible and not depressed if and only if he is red and smoggy.
Aldis being not round and Lee being enchanting imply that Sherwin is depressed.
If Lambert is not red, then Aldis is not enchanting, and vice versa.
If someone is smoggy and round, then he is both red and depressed, and vice versa.
Sheridan being enchanting or Sheridan being red implies that Sherwin is not depressed.
Someone is not smoggy and depressed if and only if he is red.
It can be concluded that Lee is enchanting and Sheridan is depressed once knowing that Chrysta is round.
If someone is not round, then he is not enchanting.
Lambert is enchanting if and only if Sherwin is not red.
If someone is impossible, then he is both smoggy and not depressed.
If all people are depressed or smoggy, then Sherwin is not red.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not enchanting once knowing that Quinn is smoggy.
|
Quinn is not red.
|
contradiction
|
Quinn is depressed.
Lambert is depressed.
Sherwin is not red.
Sherwin is enchanting.
Lambert is not enchanting.
Quinn is red.
Lee is not red.
Lambert is round.
Lambert is smoggy.
Sherwin is not depressed.
Lee is not impossible.
Chrysta is depressed.Someone is impossible and not depressed if and only if he is red and smoggy.
Aldis being not round and Lee being enchanting imply that Sherwin is depressed.
If Lambert is not red, then Aldis is not enchanting, and vice versa.
If someone is smoggy and round, then he is both red and depressed, and vice versa.
Sheridan being enchanting or Sheridan being red implies that Sherwin is not depressed.
Someone is not smoggy and depressed if and only if he is red.
It can be concluded that Lee is enchanting and Sheridan is depressed once knowing that Chrysta is round.
If someone is not round, then he is not enchanting.
Lambert is enchanting if and only if Sherwin is not red.
If someone is impossible, then he is both smoggy and not depressed.
If all people are depressed or smoggy, then Sherwin is not red.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not enchanting once knowing that Quinn is smoggy.
|
Lambert is not depressed.
|
self_contradiction
|
Quinn is depressed.
Lambert is depressed.
Sherwin is not red.
Sherwin is enchanting.
Lambert is not enchanting.
Quinn is red.
Lee is not red.
Lambert is round.
Lambert is smoggy.
Sherwin is not depressed.
Lee is not impossible.
Chrysta is depressed.Someone is impossible and not depressed if and only if he is red and smoggy.
Aldis being not round and Lee being enchanting imply that Sherwin is depressed.
If Lambert is not red, then Aldis is not enchanting, and vice versa.
If someone is smoggy and round, then he is both red and depressed, and vice versa.
Sheridan being enchanting or Sheridan being red implies that Sherwin is not depressed.
Someone is not smoggy and depressed if and only if he is red.
It can be concluded that Lee is enchanting and Sheridan is depressed once knowing that Chrysta is round.
If someone is not round, then he is not enchanting.
Lambert is enchanting if and only if Sherwin is not red.
If someone is impossible, then he is both smoggy and not depressed.
If all people are depressed or smoggy, then Sherwin is not red.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not enchanting once knowing that Quinn is smoggy.
|
Lee is red.
|
contradiction
|
Quinn is depressed.
Lambert is depressed.
Sherwin is not red.
Sherwin is enchanting.
Lambert is not enchanting.
Quinn is red.
Lee is not red.
Lambert is round.
Lambert is smoggy.
Sherwin is not depressed.
Lee is not impossible.
Chrysta is depressed.Someone is impossible and not depressed if and only if he is red and smoggy.
Aldis being not round and Lee being enchanting imply that Sherwin is depressed.
If Lambert is not red, then Aldis is not enchanting, and vice versa.
If someone is smoggy and round, then he is both red and depressed, and vice versa.
Sheridan being enchanting or Sheridan being red implies that Sherwin is not depressed.
Someone is not smoggy and depressed if and only if he is red.
It can be concluded that Lee is enchanting and Sheridan is depressed once knowing that Chrysta is round.
If someone is not round, then he is not enchanting.
Lambert is enchanting if and only if Sherwin is not red.
If someone is impossible, then he is both smoggy and not depressed.
If all people are depressed or smoggy, then Sherwin is not red.
It can be concluded that Lambert is not enchanting once knowing that Quinn is smoggy.
|
Lambert is not impossible.
|
contradiction
|
Colin is not hungry.
Marshall is not fresh.
Gale is not fresh.
Gemma is latter.
Gale is hungry.
Lee is not large.
Gale is latter.
Neville is not large.
Neville is latter.
Gale is not inner.
Gemma is brave.
Colin is not inner.If Neville is not inner, then Neville is not large and Casper is hungry, and vice versa.
Someone who is large is always not brave.
Colin being not fresh implies that Casper is large and Neville is latter.
If someone is inner and not hungry, then he is not large, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is hungry or not brave, then Casper is latter.
If there is at least one people who is hungry, then Marshall is not large and Colin is fresh.
Gale being not inner is equivalent to Gemma being not brave and Gemma being not large.
Someone who is eithor not latter or not inner is always not fresh.
Someone who is eithor brave or not inner is always not large.
If there is at least one people who is both not fresh and not inner, then Neville is brave.
If there is someone who is large, then Gemma is not fresh and Lee is not inner.
If someone is not brave and latter, then he is large, and vice versa.
|
Lee is fresh.
|
contradiction
|
Colin is not hungry.
Marshall is not fresh.
Gale is not fresh.
Gemma is latter.
Gale is hungry.
Lee is not large.
Gale is latter.
Neville is not large.
Neville is latter.
Gale is not inner.
Gemma is brave.
Colin is not inner.If Neville is not inner, then Neville is not large and Casper is hungry, and vice versa.
Someone who is large is always not brave.
Colin being not fresh implies that Casper is large and Neville is latter.
If someone is inner and not hungry, then he is not large, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is hungry or not brave, then Casper is latter.
If there is at least one people who is hungry, then Marshall is not large and Colin is fresh.
Gale being not inner is equivalent to Gemma being not brave and Gemma being not large.
Someone who is eithor not latter or not inner is always not fresh.
Someone who is eithor brave or not inner is always not large.
If there is at least one people who is both not fresh and not inner, then Neville is brave.
If there is someone who is large, then Gemma is not fresh and Lee is not inner.
If someone is not brave and latter, then he is large, and vice versa.
|
Casper is not hungry.
|
neutral
|
Colin is not hungry.
Marshall is not fresh.
Gale is not fresh.
Gemma is latter.
Gale is hungry.
Lee is not large.
Gale is latter.
Neville is not large.
Neville is latter.
Gale is not inner.
Gemma is brave.
Colin is not inner.If Neville is not inner, then Neville is not large and Casper is hungry, and vice versa.
Someone who is large is always not brave.
Colin being not fresh implies that Casper is large and Neville is latter.
If someone is inner and not hungry, then he is not large, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is hungry or not brave, then Casper is latter.
If there is at least one people who is hungry, then Marshall is not large and Colin is fresh.
Gale being not inner is equivalent to Gemma being not brave and Gemma being not large.
Someone who is eithor not latter or not inner is always not fresh.
Someone who is eithor brave or not inner is always not large.
If there is at least one people who is both not fresh and not inner, then Neville is brave.
If there is someone who is large, then Gemma is not fresh and Lee is not inner.
If someone is not brave and latter, then he is large, and vice versa.
|
Colin is hungry.
|
contradiction
|
Colin is not hungry.
Marshall is not fresh.
Gale is not fresh.
Gemma is latter.
Gale is hungry.
Lee is not large.
Gale is latter.
Neville is not large.
Neville is latter.
Gale is not inner.
Gemma is brave.
Colin is not inner.If Neville is not inner, then Neville is not large and Casper is hungry, and vice versa.
Someone who is large is always not brave.
Colin being not fresh implies that Casper is large and Neville is latter.
If someone is inner and not hungry, then he is not large, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is hungry or not brave, then Casper is latter.
If there is at least one people who is hungry, then Marshall is not large and Colin is fresh.
Gale being not inner is equivalent to Gemma being not brave and Gemma being not large.
Someone who is eithor not latter or not inner is always not fresh.
Someone who is eithor brave or not inner is always not large.
If there is at least one people who is both not fresh and not inner, then Neville is brave.
If there is someone who is large, then Gemma is not fresh and Lee is not inner.
If someone is not brave and latter, then he is large, and vice versa.
|
Casper is not fresh.
|
neutral
|
Colin is not hungry.
Marshall is not fresh.
Gale is not fresh.
Gemma is latter.
Gale is hungry.
Lee is not large.
Gale is latter.
Neville is not large.
Neville is latter.
Gale is not inner.
Gemma is brave.
Colin is not inner.If Neville is not inner, then Neville is not large and Casper is hungry, and vice versa.
Someone who is large is always not brave.
Colin being not fresh implies that Casper is large and Neville is latter.
If someone is inner and not hungry, then he is not large, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is hungry or not brave, then Casper is latter.
If there is at least one people who is hungry, then Marshall is not large and Colin is fresh.
Gale being not inner is equivalent to Gemma being not brave and Gemma being not large.
Someone who is eithor not latter or not inner is always not fresh.
Someone who is eithor brave or not inner is always not large.
If there is at least one people who is both not fresh and not inner, then Neville is brave.
If there is someone who is large, then Gemma is not fresh and Lee is not inner.
If someone is not brave and latter, then he is large, and vice versa.
|
Gemma is not large.
|
self_contradiction
|
Colin is not hungry.
Marshall is not fresh.
Gale is not fresh.
Gemma is latter.
Gale is hungry.
Lee is not large.
Gale is latter.
Neville is not large.
Neville is latter.
Gale is not inner.
Gemma is brave.
Colin is not inner.If Neville is not inner, then Neville is not large and Casper is hungry, and vice versa.
Someone who is large is always not brave.
Colin being not fresh implies that Casper is large and Neville is latter.
If someone is inner and not hungry, then he is not large, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is hungry or not brave, then Casper is latter.
If there is at least one people who is hungry, then Marshall is not large and Colin is fresh.
Gale being not inner is equivalent to Gemma being not brave and Gemma being not large.
Someone who is eithor not latter or not inner is always not fresh.
Someone who is eithor brave or not inner is always not large.
If there is at least one people who is both not fresh and not inner, then Neville is brave.
If there is someone who is large, then Gemma is not fresh and Lee is not inner.
If someone is not brave and latter, then he is large, and vice versa.
|
Colin is not brave.
|
neutral
|
Colin is not hungry.
Marshall is not fresh.
Gale is not fresh.
Gemma is latter.
Gale is hungry.
Lee is not large.
Gale is latter.
Neville is not large.
Neville is latter.
Gale is not inner.
Gemma is brave.
Colin is not inner.If Neville is not inner, then Neville is not large and Casper is hungry, and vice versa.
Someone who is large is always not brave.
Colin being not fresh implies that Casper is large and Neville is latter.
If someone is inner and not hungry, then he is not large, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is hungry or not brave, then Casper is latter.
If there is at least one people who is hungry, then Marshall is not large and Colin is fresh.
Gale being not inner is equivalent to Gemma being not brave and Gemma being not large.
Someone who is eithor not latter or not inner is always not fresh.
Someone who is eithor brave or not inner is always not large.
If there is at least one people who is both not fresh and not inner, then Neville is brave.
If there is someone who is large, then Gemma is not fresh and Lee is not inner.
If someone is not brave and latter, then he is large, and vice versa.
|
Gale is inner.
|
self_contradiction
|
Colin is not hungry.
Marshall is not fresh.
Gale is not fresh.
Gemma is latter.
Gale is hungry.
Lee is not large.
Gale is latter.
Neville is not large.
Neville is latter.
Gale is not inner.
Gemma is brave.
Colin is not inner.If Neville is not inner, then Neville is not large and Casper is hungry, and vice versa.
Someone who is large is always not brave.
Colin being not fresh implies that Casper is large and Neville is latter.
If someone is inner and not hungry, then he is not large, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is hungry or not brave, then Casper is latter.
If there is at least one people who is hungry, then Marshall is not large and Colin is fresh.
Gale being not inner is equivalent to Gemma being not brave and Gemma being not large.
Someone who is eithor not latter or not inner is always not fresh.
Someone who is eithor brave or not inner is always not large.
If there is at least one people who is both not fresh and not inner, then Neville is brave.
If there is someone who is large, then Gemma is not fresh and Lee is not inner.
If someone is not brave and latter, then he is large, and vice versa.
|
Casper is not brave.
|
entailment
|
Colin is not hungry.
Marshall is not fresh.
Gale is not fresh.
Gemma is latter.
Gale is hungry.
Lee is not large.
Gale is latter.
Neville is not large.
Neville is latter.
Gale is not inner.
Gemma is brave.
Colin is not inner.If Neville is not inner, then Neville is not large and Casper is hungry, and vice versa.
Someone who is large is always not brave.
Colin being not fresh implies that Casper is large and Neville is latter.
If someone is inner and not hungry, then he is not large, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is hungry or not brave, then Casper is latter.
If there is at least one people who is hungry, then Marshall is not large and Colin is fresh.
Gale being not inner is equivalent to Gemma being not brave and Gemma being not large.
Someone who is eithor not latter or not inner is always not fresh.
Someone who is eithor brave or not inner is always not large.
If there is at least one people who is both not fresh and not inner, then Neville is brave.
If there is someone who is large, then Gemma is not fresh and Lee is not inner.
If someone is not brave and latter, then he is large, and vice versa.
|
Neville is not inner.
|
contradiction
|
Colin is not hungry.
Marshall is not fresh.
Gale is not fresh.
Gemma is latter.
Gale is hungry.
Lee is not large.
Gale is latter.
Neville is not large.
Neville is latter.
Gale is not inner.
Gemma is brave.
Colin is not inner.If Neville is not inner, then Neville is not large and Casper is hungry, and vice versa.
Someone who is large is always not brave.
Colin being not fresh implies that Casper is large and Neville is latter.
If someone is inner and not hungry, then he is not large, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is hungry or not brave, then Casper is latter.
If there is at least one people who is hungry, then Marshall is not large and Colin is fresh.
Gale being not inner is equivalent to Gemma being not brave and Gemma being not large.
Someone who is eithor not latter or not inner is always not fresh.
Someone who is eithor brave or not inner is always not large.
If there is at least one people who is both not fresh and not inner, then Neville is brave.
If there is someone who is large, then Gemma is not fresh and Lee is not inner.
If someone is not brave and latter, then he is large, and vice versa.
|
Marshall is hungry.
|
contradiction
|
Colin is not hungry.
Marshall is not fresh.
Gale is not fresh.
Gemma is latter.
Gale is hungry.
Lee is not large.
Gale is latter.
Neville is not large.
Neville is latter.
Gale is not inner.
Gemma is brave.
Colin is not inner.If Neville is not inner, then Neville is not large and Casper is hungry, and vice versa.
Someone who is large is always not brave.
Colin being not fresh implies that Casper is large and Neville is latter.
If someone is inner and not hungry, then he is not large, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is hungry or not brave, then Casper is latter.
If there is at least one people who is hungry, then Marshall is not large and Colin is fresh.
Gale being not inner is equivalent to Gemma being not brave and Gemma being not large.
Someone who is eithor not latter or not inner is always not fresh.
Someone who is eithor brave or not inner is always not large.
If there is at least one people who is both not fresh and not inner, then Neville is brave.
If there is someone who is large, then Gemma is not fresh and Lee is not inner.
If someone is not brave and latter, then he is large, and vice versa.
|
Gemma is not fresh.
|
entailment
|
Colin is not hungry.
Marshall is not fresh.
Gale is not fresh.
Gemma is latter.
Gale is hungry.
Lee is not large.
Gale is latter.
Neville is not large.
Neville is latter.
Gale is not inner.
Gemma is brave.
Colin is not inner.If Neville is not inner, then Neville is not large and Casper is hungry, and vice versa.
Someone who is large is always not brave.
Colin being not fresh implies that Casper is large and Neville is latter.
If someone is inner and not hungry, then he is not large, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is hungry or not brave, then Casper is latter.
If there is at least one people who is hungry, then Marshall is not large and Colin is fresh.
Gale being not inner is equivalent to Gemma being not brave and Gemma being not large.
Someone who is eithor not latter or not inner is always not fresh.
Someone who is eithor brave or not inner is always not large.
If there is at least one people who is both not fresh and not inner, then Neville is brave.
If there is someone who is large, then Gemma is not fresh and Lee is not inner.
If someone is not brave and latter, then he is large, and vice versa.
|
Marshall is not hungry.
|
entailment
|
Colin is not hungry.
Marshall is not fresh.
Gale is not fresh.
Gemma is latter.
Gale is hungry.
Lee is not large.
Gale is latter.
Neville is not large.
Neville is latter.
Gale is not inner.
Gemma is brave.
Colin is not inner.If Neville is not inner, then Neville is not large and Casper is hungry, and vice versa.
Someone who is large is always not brave.
Colin being not fresh implies that Casper is large and Neville is latter.
If someone is inner and not hungry, then he is not large, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is hungry or not brave, then Casper is latter.
If there is at least one people who is hungry, then Marshall is not large and Colin is fresh.
Gale being not inner is equivalent to Gemma being not brave and Gemma being not large.
Someone who is eithor not latter or not inner is always not fresh.
Someone who is eithor brave or not inner is always not large.
If there is at least one people who is both not fresh and not inner, then Neville is brave.
If there is someone who is large, then Gemma is not fresh and Lee is not inner.
If someone is not brave and latter, then he is large, and vice versa.
|
Neville is not large.
|
entailment
|
Colin is not hungry.
Marshall is not fresh.
Gale is not fresh.
Gemma is latter.
Gale is hungry.
Lee is not large.
Gale is latter.
Neville is not large.
Neville is latter.
Gale is not inner.
Gemma is brave.
Colin is not inner.If Neville is not inner, then Neville is not large and Casper is hungry, and vice versa.
Someone who is large is always not brave.
Colin being not fresh implies that Casper is large and Neville is latter.
If someone is inner and not hungry, then he is not large, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is hungry or not brave, then Casper is latter.
If there is at least one people who is hungry, then Marshall is not large and Colin is fresh.
Gale being not inner is equivalent to Gemma being not brave and Gemma being not large.
Someone who is eithor not latter or not inner is always not fresh.
Someone who is eithor brave or not inner is always not large.
If there is at least one people who is both not fresh and not inner, then Neville is brave.
If there is someone who is large, then Gemma is not fresh and Lee is not inner.
If someone is not brave and latter, then he is large, and vice versa.
|
Gemma is brave.
|
self_contradiction
|
Colin is not hungry.
Marshall is not fresh.
Gale is not fresh.
Gemma is latter.
Gale is hungry.
Lee is not large.
Gale is latter.
Neville is not large.
Neville is latter.
Gale is not inner.
Gemma is brave.
Colin is not inner.If Neville is not inner, then Neville is not large and Casper is hungry, and vice versa.
Someone who is large is always not brave.
Colin being not fresh implies that Casper is large and Neville is latter.
If someone is inner and not hungry, then he is not large, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is hungry or not brave, then Casper is latter.
If there is at least one people who is hungry, then Marshall is not large and Colin is fresh.
Gale being not inner is equivalent to Gemma being not brave and Gemma being not large.
Someone who is eithor not latter or not inner is always not fresh.
Someone who is eithor brave or not inner is always not large.
If there is at least one people who is both not fresh and not inner, then Neville is brave.
If there is someone who is large, then Gemma is not fresh and Lee is not inner.
If someone is not brave and latter, then he is large, and vice versa.
|
Gale is not hungry.
|
self_contradiction
|
Colin is not hungry.
Marshall is not fresh.
Gale is not fresh.
Gemma is latter.
Gale is hungry.
Lee is not large.
Gale is latter.
Neville is not large.
Neville is latter.
Gale is not inner.
Gemma is brave.
Colin is not inner.If Neville is not inner, then Neville is not large and Casper is hungry, and vice versa.
Someone who is large is always not brave.
Colin being not fresh implies that Casper is large and Neville is latter.
If someone is inner and not hungry, then he is not large, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is hungry or not brave, then Casper is latter.
If there is at least one people who is hungry, then Marshall is not large and Colin is fresh.
Gale being not inner is equivalent to Gemma being not brave and Gemma being not large.
Someone who is eithor not latter or not inner is always not fresh.
Someone who is eithor brave or not inner is always not large.
If there is at least one people who is both not fresh and not inner, then Neville is brave.
If there is someone who is large, then Gemma is not fresh and Lee is not inner.
If someone is not brave and latter, then he is large, and vice versa.
|
Colin is not hungry.
|
entailment
|
Colin is not hungry.
Marshall is not fresh.
Gale is not fresh.
Gemma is latter.
Gale is hungry.
Lee is not large.
Gale is latter.
Neville is not large.
Neville is latter.
Gale is not inner.
Gemma is brave.
Colin is not inner.If Neville is not inner, then Neville is not large and Casper is hungry, and vice versa.
Someone who is large is always not brave.
Colin being not fresh implies that Casper is large and Neville is latter.
If someone is inner and not hungry, then he is not large, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is hungry or not brave, then Casper is latter.
If there is at least one people who is hungry, then Marshall is not large and Colin is fresh.
Gale being not inner is equivalent to Gemma being not brave and Gemma being not large.
Someone who is eithor not latter or not inner is always not fresh.
Someone who is eithor brave or not inner is always not large.
If there is at least one people who is both not fresh and not inner, then Neville is brave.
If there is someone who is large, then Gemma is not fresh and Lee is not inner.
If someone is not brave and latter, then he is large, and vice versa.
|
Marshall is brave.
|
neutral
|
Colin is not hungry.
Marshall is not fresh.
Gale is not fresh.
Gemma is latter.
Gale is hungry.
Lee is not large.
Gale is latter.
Neville is not large.
Neville is latter.
Gale is not inner.
Gemma is brave.
Colin is not inner.If Neville is not inner, then Neville is not large and Casper is hungry, and vice versa.
Someone who is large is always not brave.
Colin being not fresh implies that Casper is large and Neville is latter.
If someone is inner and not hungry, then he is not large, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is hungry or not brave, then Casper is latter.
If there is at least one people who is hungry, then Marshall is not large and Colin is fresh.
Gale being not inner is equivalent to Gemma being not brave and Gemma being not large.
Someone who is eithor not latter or not inner is always not fresh.
Someone who is eithor brave or not inner is always not large.
If there is at least one people who is both not fresh and not inner, then Neville is brave.
If there is someone who is large, then Gemma is not fresh and Lee is not inner.
If someone is not brave and latter, then he is large, and vice versa.
|
Gemma is not brave.
|
self_contradiction
|
Colin is not hungry.
Marshall is not fresh.
Gale is not fresh.
Gemma is latter.
Gale is hungry.
Lee is not large.
Gale is latter.
Neville is not large.
Neville is latter.
Gale is not inner.
Gemma is brave.
Colin is not inner.If Neville is not inner, then Neville is not large and Casper is hungry, and vice versa.
Someone who is large is always not brave.
Colin being not fresh implies that Casper is large and Neville is latter.
If someone is inner and not hungry, then he is not large, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is hungry or not brave, then Casper is latter.
If there is at least one people who is hungry, then Marshall is not large and Colin is fresh.
Gale being not inner is equivalent to Gemma being not brave and Gemma being not large.
Someone who is eithor not latter or not inner is always not fresh.
Someone who is eithor brave or not inner is always not large.
If there is at least one people who is both not fresh and not inner, then Neville is brave.
If there is someone who is large, then Gemma is not fresh and Lee is not inner.
If someone is not brave and latter, then he is large, and vice versa.
|
Gale is not brave.
|
neutral
|
Colin is not hungry.
Marshall is not fresh.
Gale is not fresh.
Gemma is latter.
Gale is hungry.
Lee is not large.
Gale is latter.
Neville is not large.
Neville is latter.
Gale is not inner.
Gemma is brave.
Colin is not inner.If Neville is not inner, then Neville is not large and Casper is hungry, and vice versa.
Someone who is large is always not brave.
Colin being not fresh implies that Casper is large and Neville is latter.
If someone is inner and not hungry, then he is not large, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is hungry or not brave, then Casper is latter.
If there is at least one people who is hungry, then Marshall is not large and Colin is fresh.
Gale being not inner is equivalent to Gemma being not brave and Gemma being not large.
Someone who is eithor not latter or not inner is always not fresh.
Someone who is eithor brave or not inner is always not large.
If there is at least one people who is both not fresh and not inner, then Neville is brave.
If there is someone who is large, then Gemma is not fresh and Lee is not inner.
If someone is not brave and latter, then he is large, and vice versa.
|
Neville is not brave.
|
contradiction
|
Jacob is not warm-hearted.
Lucille is selfish.
Lloyd is triangular.
Jacob is not helpful.
Lloyd is not competitive.
Jacob is not triangular.
Garth is helpful.
Morton is not green.
Alisa is selfish.
Lucille is warm-hearted.
Ryan is selfish.
Garth is not triangular.If someone is warm-hearted or he is not green, then he is not selfish.
Someone being both not warm-hearted and not triangular is equivalent to being green and selfish.
If Garth is not green or Alisa is not helpful, then Jacob is triangular.
If there is at least one people who is not warm-hearted, then Lloyd is not green.
Garth being green is equivalent to Lucille being triangular and Ryan being not selfish.
Someone is warm-hearted if and only if he is competitive.
If someone is not green, then he is not helpful.
If Alisa is not helpful, then Morton is not selfish and Lloyd is not warm-hearted, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpful and not competitive, then Jacob is triangular.
If all people are green or not selfish, then Lloyd is not helpful.
As long as someone is helpful, he is not competitive and warm-hearted.
If there is someone who is either not green or not warm-hearted, then Alisa is not selfish.
|
Garth is not warm-hearted.
|
contradiction
|
Jacob is not warm-hearted.
Lucille is selfish.
Lloyd is triangular.
Jacob is not helpful.
Lloyd is not competitive.
Jacob is not triangular.
Garth is helpful.
Morton is not green.
Alisa is selfish.
Lucille is warm-hearted.
Ryan is selfish.
Garth is not triangular.If someone is warm-hearted or he is not green, then he is not selfish.
Someone being both not warm-hearted and not triangular is equivalent to being green and selfish.
If Garth is not green or Alisa is not helpful, then Jacob is triangular.
If there is at least one people who is not warm-hearted, then Lloyd is not green.
Garth being green is equivalent to Lucille being triangular and Ryan being not selfish.
Someone is warm-hearted if and only if he is competitive.
If someone is not green, then he is not helpful.
If Alisa is not helpful, then Morton is not selfish and Lloyd is not warm-hearted, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpful and not competitive, then Jacob is triangular.
If all people are green or not selfish, then Lloyd is not helpful.
As long as someone is helpful, he is not competitive and warm-hearted.
If there is someone who is either not green or not warm-hearted, then Alisa is not selfish.
|
Morton is helpful.
|
contradiction
|
Jacob is not warm-hearted.
Lucille is selfish.
Lloyd is triangular.
Jacob is not helpful.
Lloyd is not competitive.
Jacob is not triangular.
Garth is helpful.
Morton is not green.
Alisa is selfish.
Lucille is warm-hearted.
Ryan is selfish.
Garth is not triangular.If someone is warm-hearted or he is not green, then he is not selfish.
Someone being both not warm-hearted and not triangular is equivalent to being green and selfish.
If Garth is not green or Alisa is not helpful, then Jacob is triangular.
If there is at least one people who is not warm-hearted, then Lloyd is not green.
Garth being green is equivalent to Lucille being triangular and Ryan being not selfish.
Someone is warm-hearted if and only if he is competitive.
If someone is not green, then he is not helpful.
If Alisa is not helpful, then Morton is not selfish and Lloyd is not warm-hearted, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpful and not competitive, then Jacob is triangular.
If all people are green or not selfish, then Lloyd is not helpful.
As long as someone is helpful, he is not competitive and warm-hearted.
If there is someone who is either not green or not warm-hearted, then Alisa is not selfish.
|
Lucille is not warm-hearted.
|
contradiction
|
Jacob is not warm-hearted.
Lucille is selfish.
Lloyd is triangular.
Jacob is not helpful.
Lloyd is not competitive.
Jacob is not triangular.
Garth is helpful.
Morton is not green.
Alisa is selfish.
Lucille is warm-hearted.
Ryan is selfish.
Garth is not triangular.If someone is warm-hearted or he is not green, then he is not selfish.
Someone being both not warm-hearted and not triangular is equivalent to being green and selfish.
If Garth is not green or Alisa is not helpful, then Jacob is triangular.
If there is at least one people who is not warm-hearted, then Lloyd is not green.
Garth being green is equivalent to Lucille being triangular and Ryan being not selfish.
Someone is warm-hearted if and only if he is competitive.
If someone is not green, then he is not helpful.
If Alisa is not helpful, then Morton is not selfish and Lloyd is not warm-hearted, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpful and not competitive, then Jacob is triangular.
If all people are green or not selfish, then Lloyd is not helpful.
As long as someone is helpful, he is not competitive and warm-hearted.
If there is someone who is either not green or not warm-hearted, then Alisa is not selfish.
|
Garth is helpful.
|
entailment
|
Jacob is not warm-hearted.
Lucille is selfish.
Lloyd is triangular.
Jacob is not helpful.
Lloyd is not competitive.
Jacob is not triangular.
Garth is helpful.
Morton is not green.
Alisa is selfish.
Lucille is warm-hearted.
Ryan is selfish.
Garth is not triangular.If someone is warm-hearted or he is not green, then he is not selfish.
Someone being both not warm-hearted and not triangular is equivalent to being green and selfish.
If Garth is not green or Alisa is not helpful, then Jacob is triangular.
If there is at least one people who is not warm-hearted, then Lloyd is not green.
Garth being green is equivalent to Lucille being triangular and Ryan being not selfish.
Someone is warm-hearted if and only if he is competitive.
If someone is not green, then he is not helpful.
If Alisa is not helpful, then Morton is not selfish and Lloyd is not warm-hearted, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpful and not competitive, then Jacob is triangular.
If all people are green or not selfish, then Lloyd is not helpful.
As long as someone is helpful, he is not competitive and warm-hearted.
If there is someone who is either not green or not warm-hearted, then Alisa is not selfish.
|
Alisa is not helpful.
|
neutral
|
Jacob is not warm-hearted.
Lucille is selfish.
Lloyd is triangular.
Jacob is not helpful.
Lloyd is not competitive.
Jacob is not triangular.
Garth is helpful.
Morton is not green.
Alisa is selfish.
Lucille is warm-hearted.
Ryan is selfish.
Garth is not triangular.If someone is warm-hearted or he is not green, then he is not selfish.
Someone being both not warm-hearted and not triangular is equivalent to being green and selfish.
If Garth is not green or Alisa is not helpful, then Jacob is triangular.
If there is at least one people who is not warm-hearted, then Lloyd is not green.
Garth being green is equivalent to Lucille being triangular and Ryan being not selfish.
Someone is warm-hearted if and only if he is competitive.
If someone is not green, then he is not helpful.
If Alisa is not helpful, then Morton is not selfish and Lloyd is not warm-hearted, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpful and not competitive, then Jacob is triangular.
If all people are green or not selfish, then Lloyd is not helpful.
As long as someone is helpful, he is not competitive and warm-hearted.
If there is someone who is either not green or not warm-hearted, then Alisa is not selfish.
|
Lloyd is not selfish.
|
entailment
|
Jacob is not warm-hearted.
Lucille is selfish.
Lloyd is triangular.
Jacob is not helpful.
Lloyd is not competitive.
Jacob is not triangular.
Garth is helpful.
Morton is not green.
Alisa is selfish.
Lucille is warm-hearted.
Ryan is selfish.
Garth is not triangular.If someone is warm-hearted or he is not green, then he is not selfish.
Someone being both not warm-hearted and not triangular is equivalent to being green and selfish.
If Garth is not green or Alisa is not helpful, then Jacob is triangular.
If there is at least one people who is not warm-hearted, then Lloyd is not green.
Garth being green is equivalent to Lucille being triangular and Ryan being not selfish.
Someone is warm-hearted if and only if he is competitive.
If someone is not green, then he is not helpful.
If Alisa is not helpful, then Morton is not selfish and Lloyd is not warm-hearted, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpful and not competitive, then Jacob is triangular.
If all people are green or not selfish, then Lloyd is not helpful.
As long as someone is helpful, he is not competitive and warm-hearted.
If there is someone who is either not green or not warm-hearted, then Alisa is not selfish.
|
Garth is not selfish.
|
entailment
|
Jacob is not warm-hearted.
Lucille is selfish.
Lloyd is triangular.
Jacob is not helpful.
Lloyd is not competitive.
Jacob is not triangular.
Garth is helpful.
Morton is not green.
Alisa is selfish.
Lucille is warm-hearted.
Ryan is selfish.
Garth is not triangular.If someone is warm-hearted or he is not green, then he is not selfish.
Someone being both not warm-hearted and not triangular is equivalent to being green and selfish.
If Garth is not green or Alisa is not helpful, then Jacob is triangular.
If there is at least one people who is not warm-hearted, then Lloyd is not green.
Garth being green is equivalent to Lucille being triangular and Ryan being not selfish.
Someone is warm-hearted if and only if he is competitive.
If someone is not green, then he is not helpful.
If Alisa is not helpful, then Morton is not selfish and Lloyd is not warm-hearted, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpful and not competitive, then Jacob is triangular.
If all people are green or not selfish, then Lloyd is not helpful.
As long as someone is helpful, he is not competitive and warm-hearted.
If there is someone who is either not green or not warm-hearted, then Alisa is not selfish.
|
Jacob is triangular.
|
self_contradiction
|
Jacob is not warm-hearted.
Lucille is selfish.
Lloyd is triangular.
Jacob is not helpful.
Lloyd is not competitive.
Jacob is not triangular.
Garth is helpful.
Morton is not green.
Alisa is selfish.
Lucille is warm-hearted.
Ryan is selfish.
Garth is not triangular.If someone is warm-hearted or he is not green, then he is not selfish.
Someone being both not warm-hearted and not triangular is equivalent to being green and selfish.
If Garth is not green or Alisa is not helpful, then Jacob is triangular.
If there is at least one people who is not warm-hearted, then Lloyd is not green.
Garth being green is equivalent to Lucille being triangular and Ryan being not selfish.
Someone is warm-hearted if and only if he is competitive.
If someone is not green, then he is not helpful.
If Alisa is not helpful, then Morton is not selfish and Lloyd is not warm-hearted, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpful and not competitive, then Jacob is triangular.
If all people are green or not selfish, then Lloyd is not helpful.
As long as someone is helpful, he is not competitive and warm-hearted.
If there is someone who is either not green or not warm-hearted, then Alisa is not selfish.
|
Lucille is selfish.
|
self_contradiction
|
Jacob is not warm-hearted.
Lucille is selfish.
Lloyd is triangular.
Jacob is not helpful.
Lloyd is not competitive.
Jacob is not triangular.
Garth is helpful.
Morton is not green.
Alisa is selfish.
Lucille is warm-hearted.
Ryan is selfish.
Garth is not triangular.If someone is warm-hearted or he is not green, then he is not selfish.
Someone being both not warm-hearted and not triangular is equivalent to being green and selfish.
If Garth is not green or Alisa is not helpful, then Jacob is triangular.
If there is at least one people who is not warm-hearted, then Lloyd is not green.
Garth being green is equivalent to Lucille being triangular and Ryan being not selfish.
Someone is warm-hearted if and only if he is competitive.
If someone is not green, then he is not helpful.
If Alisa is not helpful, then Morton is not selfish and Lloyd is not warm-hearted, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpful and not competitive, then Jacob is triangular.
If all people are green or not selfish, then Lloyd is not helpful.
As long as someone is helpful, he is not competitive and warm-hearted.
If there is someone who is either not green or not warm-hearted, then Alisa is not selfish.
|
Alisa is not selfish.
|
self_contradiction
|
Jacob is not warm-hearted.
Lucille is selfish.
Lloyd is triangular.
Jacob is not helpful.
Lloyd is not competitive.
Jacob is not triangular.
Garth is helpful.
Morton is not green.
Alisa is selfish.
Lucille is warm-hearted.
Ryan is selfish.
Garth is not triangular.If someone is warm-hearted or he is not green, then he is not selfish.
Someone being both not warm-hearted and not triangular is equivalent to being green and selfish.
If Garth is not green or Alisa is not helpful, then Jacob is triangular.
If there is at least one people who is not warm-hearted, then Lloyd is not green.
Garth being green is equivalent to Lucille being triangular and Ryan being not selfish.
Someone is warm-hearted if and only if he is competitive.
If someone is not green, then he is not helpful.
If Alisa is not helpful, then Morton is not selfish and Lloyd is not warm-hearted, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpful and not competitive, then Jacob is triangular.
If all people are green or not selfish, then Lloyd is not helpful.
As long as someone is helpful, he is not competitive and warm-hearted.
If there is someone who is either not green or not warm-hearted, then Alisa is not selfish.
|
Ryan is warm-hearted.
|
neutral
|
Jacob is not warm-hearted.
Lucille is selfish.
Lloyd is triangular.
Jacob is not helpful.
Lloyd is not competitive.
Jacob is not triangular.
Garth is helpful.
Morton is not green.
Alisa is selfish.
Lucille is warm-hearted.
Ryan is selfish.
Garth is not triangular.If someone is warm-hearted or he is not green, then he is not selfish.
Someone being both not warm-hearted and not triangular is equivalent to being green and selfish.
If Garth is not green or Alisa is not helpful, then Jacob is triangular.
If there is at least one people who is not warm-hearted, then Lloyd is not green.
Garth being green is equivalent to Lucille being triangular and Ryan being not selfish.
Someone is warm-hearted if and only if he is competitive.
If someone is not green, then he is not helpful.
If Alisa is not helpful, then Morton is not selfish and Lloyd is not warm-hearted, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpful and not competitive, then Jacob is triangular.
If all people are green or not selfish, then Lloyd is not helpful.
As long as someone is helpful, he is not competitive and warm-hearted.
If there is someone who is either not green or not warm-hearted, then Alisa is not selfish.
|
Jacob is helpful.
|
contradiction
|
Jacob is not warm-hearted.
Lucille is selfish.
Lloyd is triangular.
Jacob is not helpful.
Lloyd is not competitive.
Jacob is not triangular.
Garth is helpful.
Morton is not green.
Alisa is selfish.
Lucille is warm-hearted.
Ryan is selfish.
Garth is not triangular.If someone is warm-hearted or he is not green, then he is not selfish.
Someone being both not warm-hearted and not triangular is equivalent to being green and selfish.
If Garth is not green or Alisa is not helpful, then Jacob is triangular.
If there is at least one people who is not warm-hearted, then Lloyd is not green.
Garth being green is equivalent to Lucille being triangular and Ryan being not selfish.
Someone is warm-hearted if and only if he is competitive.
If someone is not green, then he is not helpful.
If Alisa is not helpful, then Morton is not selfish and Lloyd is not warm-hearted, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpful and not competitive, then Jacob is triangular.
If all people are green or not selfish, then Lloyd is not helpful.
As long as someone is helpful, he is not competitive and warm-hearted.
If there is someone who is either not green or not warm-hearted, then Alisa is not selfish.
|
Garth is not competitive.
|
self_contradiction
|
Jacob is not warm-hearted.
Lucille is selfish.
Lloyd is triangular.
Jacob is not helpful.
Lloyd is not competitive.
Jacob is not triangular.
Garth is helpful.
Morton is not green.
Alisa is selfish.
Lucille is warm-hearted.
Ryan is selfish.
Garth is not triangular.If someone is warm-hearted or he is not green, then he is not selfish.
Someone being both not warm-hearted and not triangular is equivalent to being green and selfish.
If Garth is not green or Alisa is not helpful, then Jacob is triangular.
If there is at least one people who is not warm-hearted, then Lloyd is not green.
Garth being green is equivalent to Lucille being triangular and Ryan being not selfish.
Someone is warm-hearted if and only if he is competitive.
If someone is not green, then he is not helpful.
If Alisa is not helpful, then Morton is not selfish and Lloyd is not warm-hearted, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpful and not competitive, then Jacob is triangular.
If all people are green or not selfish, then Lloyd is not helpful.
As long as someone is helpful, he is not competitive and warm-hearted.
If there is someone who is either not green or not warm-hearted, then Alisa is not selfish.
|
Jacob is selfish.
|
entailment
|
Jacob is not warm-hearted.
Lucille is selfish.
Lloyd is triangular.
Jacob is not helpful.
Lloyd is not competitive.
Jacob is not triangular.
Garth is helpful.
Morton is not green.
Alisa is selfish.
Lucille is warm-hearted.
Ryan is selfish.
Garth is not triangular.If someone is warm-hearted or he is not green, then he is not selfish.
Someone being both not warm-hearted and not triangular is equivalent to being green and selfish.
If Garth is not green or Alisa is not helpful, then Jacob is triangular.
If there is at least one people who is not warm-hearted, then Lloyd is not green.
Garth being green is equivalent to Lucille being triangular and Ryan being not selfish.
Someone is warm-hearted if and only if he is competitive.
If someone is not green, then he is not helpful.
If Alisa is not helpful, then Morton is not selfish and Lloyd is not warm-hearted, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpful and not competitive, then Jacob is triangular.
If all people are green or not selfish, then Lloyd is not helpful.
As long as someone is helpful, he is not competitive and warm-hearted.
If there is someone who is either not green or not warm-hearted, then Alisa is not selfish.
|
Lloyd is competitive.
|
contradiction
|
Jacob is not warm-hearted.
Lucille is selfish.
Lloyd is triangular.
Jacob is not helpful.
Lloyd is not competitive.
Jacob is not triangular.
Garth is helpful.
Morton is not green.
Alisa is selfish.
Lucille is warm-hearted.
Ryan is selfish.
Garth is not triangular.If someone is warm-hearted or he is not green, then he is not selfish.
Someone being both not warm-hearted and not triangular is equivalent to being green and selfish.
If Garth is not green or Alisa is not helpful, then Jacob is triangular.
If there is at least one people who is not warm-hearted, then Lloyd is not green.
Garth being green is equivalent to Lucille being triangular and Ryan being not selfish.
Someone is warm-hearted if and only if he is competitive.
If someone is not green, then he is not helpful.
If Alisa is not helpful, then Morton is not selfish and Lloyd is not warm-hearted, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpful and not competitive, then Jacob is triangular.
If all people are green or not selfish, then Lloyd is not helpful.
As long as someone is helpful, he is not competitive and warm-hearted.
If there is someone who is either not green or not warm-hearted, then Alisa is not selfish.
|
Lloyd is warm-hearted.
|
neutral
|
Jacob is not warm-hearted.
Lucille is selfish.
Lloyd is triangular.
Jacob is not helpful.
Lloyd is not competitive.
Jacob is not triangular.
Garth is helpful.
Morton is not green.
Alisa is selfish.
Lucille is warm-hearted.
Ryan is selfish.
Garth is not triangular.If someone is warm-hearted or he is not green, then he is not selfish.
Someone being both not warm-hearted and not triangular is equivalent to being green and selfish.
If Garth is not green or Alisa is not helpful, then Jacob is triangular.
If there is at least one people who is not warm-hearted, then Lloyd is not green.
Garth being green is equivalent to Lucille being triangular and Ryan being not selfish.
Someone is warm-hearted if and only if he is competitive.
If someone is not green, then he is not helpful.
If Alisa is not helpful, then Morton is not selfish and Lloyd is not warm-hearted, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpful and not competitive, then Jacob is triangular.
If all people are green or not selfish, then Lloyd is not helpful.
As long as someone is helpful, he is not competitive and warm-hearted.
If there is someone who is either not green or not warm-hearted, then Alisa is not selfish.
|
Alisa is warm-hearted.
|
neutral
|
Jacob is not warm-hearted.
Lucille is selfish.
Lloyd is triangular.
Jacob is not helpful.
Lloyd is not competitive.
Jacob is not triangular.
Garth is helpful.
Morton is not green.
Alisa is selfish.
Lucille is warm-hearted.
Ryan is selfish.
Garth is not triangular.If someone is warm-hearted or he is not green, then he is not selfish.
Someone being both not warm-hearted and not triangular is equivalent to being green and selfish.
If Garth is not green or Alisa is not helpful, then Jacob is triangular.
If there is at least one people who is not warm-hearted, then Lloyd is not green.
Garth being green is equivalent to Lucille being triangular and Ryan being not selfish.
Someone is warm-hearted if and only if he is competitive.
If someone is not green, then he is not helpful.
If Alisa is not helpful, then Morton is not selfish and Lloyd is not warm-hearted, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpful and not competitive, then Jacob is triangular.
If all people are green or not selfish, then Lloyd is not helpful.
As long as someone is helpful, he is not competitive and warm-hearted.
If there is someone who is either not green or not warm-hearted, then Alisa is not selfish.
|
Morton is not green.
|
entailment
|
Jacob is not warm-hearted.
Lucille is selfish.
Lloyd is triangular.
Jacob is not helpful.
Lloyd is not competitive.
Jacob is not triangular.
Garth is helpful.
Morton is not green.
Alisa is selfish.
Lucille is warm-hearted.
Ryan is selfish.
Garth is not triangular.If someone is warm-hearted or he is not green, then he is not selfish.
Someone being both not warm-hearted and not triangular is equivalent to being green and selfish.
If Garth is not green or Alisa is not helpful, then Jacob is triangular.
If there is at least one people who is not warm-hearted, then Lloyd is not green.
Garth being green is equivalent to Lucille being triangular and Ryan being not selfish.
Someone is warm-hearted if and only if he is competitive.
If someone is not green, then he is not helpful.
If Alisa is not helpful, then Morton is not selfish and Lloyd is not warm-hearted, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpful and not competitive, then Jacob is triangular.
If all people are green or not selfish, then Lloyd is not helpful.
As long as someone is helpful, he is not competitive and warm-hearted.
If there is someone who is either not green or not warm-hearted, then Alisa is not selfish.
|
Jacob is competitive.
|
neutral
|
Jacob is not warm-hearted.
Lucille is selfish.
Lloyd is triangular.
Jacob is not helpful.
Lloyd is not competitive.
Jacob is not triangular.
Garth is helpful.
Morton is not green.
Alisa is selfish.
Lucille is warm-hearted.
Ryan is selfish.
Garth is not triangular.If someone is warm-hearted or he is not green, then he is not selfish.
Someone being both not warm-hearted and not triangular is equivalent to being green and selfish.
If Garth is not green or Alisa is not helpful, then Jacob is triangular.
If there is at least one people who is not warm-hearted, then Lloyd is not green.
Garth being green is equivalent to Lucille being triangular and Ryan being not selfish.
Someone is warm-hearted if and only if he is competitive.
If someone is not green, then he is not helpful.
If Alisa is not helpful, then Morton is not selfish and Lloyd is not warm-hearted, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both not helpful and not competitive, then Jacob is triangular.
If all people are green or not selfish, then Lloyd is not helpful.
As long as someone is helpful, he is not competitive and warm-hearted.
If there is someone who is either not green or not warm-hearted, then Alisa is not selfish.
|
Lucille is not selfish.
|
self_contradiction
|
Cedric is wandering.
Irvin is hypocritical.
Brooke is optimistic.
Cedric is not thoughtful.
Cedric is not hypocritical.
Irvin is not wandering.
Irvin is not placid.
Lloyd is not optimistic.
Melody is not thoughtful.
Danna is not hypocritical.
Melody is placid.
Lloyd is placid.If there is someone who is not smoggy, then Lloyd is hypocritical.
Neil being hypocritical implies that Danna is placid and Danna is thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Irvin is wandering once knowing that Lloyd is thoughtful or Danna is placid.
It can be concluded that Neil is optimistic once knowing that Cedric is not hypocritical.
If someone is not placid or he is smoggy, then he is not hypocritical.
If someone is not optimistic or not hypocritical, then he is not thoughtful.
If there is someone who is both not optimistic and wandering, then Lloyd is not thoughtful.
Melody being not hypocritical or Melody being smoggy implies that Danna is not wandering.
Someone who is eithor not placid or not optimistic is always not hypocritical.
If someone is not smoggy and not placid, then he is not thoughtful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not thoughtful and not smoggy, then Neil is optimistic.
Neil is not smoggy if and only if Lloyd is optimistic and Danna is not placid.
|
Irvin is not smoggy.
|
entailment
|
Cedric is wandering.
Irvin is hypocritical.
Brooke is optimistic.
Cedric is not thoughtful.
Cedric is not hypocritical.
Irvin is not wandering.
Irvin is not placid.
Lloyd is not optimistic.
Melody is not thoughtful.
Danna is not hypocritical.
Melody is placid.
Lloyd is placid.If there is someone who is not smoggy, then Lloyd is hypocritical.
Neil being hypocritical implies that Danna is placid and Danna is thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Irvin is wandering once knowing that Lloyd is thoughtful or Danna is placid.
It can be concluded that Neil is optimistic once knowing that Cedric is not hypocritical.
If someone is not placid or he is smoggy, then he is not hypocritical.
If someone is not optimistic or not hypocritical, then he is not thoughtful.
If there is someone who is both not optimistic and wandering, then Lloyd is not thoughtful.
Melody being not hypocritical or Melody being smoggy implies that Danna is not wandering.
Someone who is eithor not placid or not optimistic is always not hypocritical.
If someone is not smoggy and not placid, then he is not thoughtful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not thoughtful and not smoggy, then Neil is optimistic.
Neil is not smoggy if and only if Lloyd is optimistic and Danna is not placid.
|
Brooke is not optimistic.
|
contradiction
|
Cedric is wandering.
Irvin is hypocritical.
Brooke is optimistic.
Cedric is not thoughtful.
Cedric is not hypocritical.
Irvin is not wandering.
Irvin is not placid.
Lloyd is not optimistic.
Melody is not thoughtful.
Danna is not hypocritical.
Melody is placid.
Lloyd is placid.If there is someone who is not smoggy, then Lloyd is hypocritical.
Neil being hypocritical implies that Danna is placid and Danna is thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Irvin is wandering once knowing that Lloyd is thoughtful or Danna is placid.
It can be concluded that Neil is optimistic once knowing that Cedric is not hypocritical.
If someone is not placid or he is smoggy, then he is not hypocritical.
If someone is not optimistic or not hypocritical, then he is not thoughtful.
If there is someone who is both not optimistic and wandering, then Lloyd is not thoughtful.
Melody being not hypocritical or Melody being smoggy implies that Danna is not wandering.
Someone who is eithor not placid or not optimistic is always not hypocritical.
If someone is not smoggy and not placid, then he is not thoughtful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not thoughtful and not smoggy, then Neil is optimistic.
Neil is not smoggy if and only if Lloyd is optimistic and Danna is not placid.
|
Neil is not hypocritical.
|
neutral
|
Cedric is wandering.
Irvin is hypocritical.
Brooke is optimistic.
Cedric is not thoughtful.
Cedric is not hypocritical.
Irvin is not wandering.
Irvin is not placid.
Lloyd is not optimistic.
Melody is not thoughtful.
Danna is not hypocritical.
Melody is placid.
Lloyd is placid.If there is someone who is not smoggy, then Lloyd is hypocritical.
Neil being hypocritical implies that Danna is placid and Danna is thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Irvin is wandering once knowing that Lloyd is thoughtful or Danna is placid.
It can be concluded that Neil is optimistic once knowing that Cedric is not hypocritical.
If someone is not placid or he is smoggy, then he is not hypocritical.
If someone is not optimistic or not hypocritical, then he is not thoughtful.
If there is someone who is both not optimistic and wandering, then Lloyd is not thoughtful.
Melody being not hypocritical or Melody being smoggy implies that Danna is not wandering.
Someone who is eithor not placid or not optimistic is always not hypocritical.
If someone is not smoggy and not placid, then he is not thoughtful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not thoughtful and not smoggy, then Neil is optimistic.
Neil is not smoggy if and only if Lloyd is optimistic and Danna is not placid.
|
Irvin is wandering.
|
contradiction
|
Cedric is wandering.
Irvin is hypocritical.
Brooke is optimistic.
Cedric is not thoughtful.
Cedric is not hypocritical.
Irvin is not wandering.
Irvin is not placid.
Lloyd is not optimistic.
Melody is not thoughtful.
Danna is not hypocritical.
Melody is placid.
Lloyd is placid.If there is someone who is not smoggy, then Lloyd is hypocritical.
Neil being hypocritical implies that Danna is placid and Danna is thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Irvin is wandering once knowing that Lloyd is thoughtful or Danna is placid.
It can be concluded that Neil is optimistic once knowing that Cedric is not hypocritical.
If someone is not placid or he is smoggy, then he is not hypocritical.
If someone is not optimistic or not hypocritical, then he is not thoughtful.
If there is someone who is both not optimistic and wandering, then Lloyd is not thoughtful.
Melody being not hypocritical or Melody being smoggy implies that Danna is not wandering.
Someone who is eithor not placid or not optimistic is always not hypocritical.
If someone is not smoggy and not placid, then he is not thoughtful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not thoughtful and not smoggy, then Neil is optimistic.
Neil is not smoggy if and only if Lloyd is optimistic and Danna is not placid.
|
Brooke is not wandering.
|
neutral
|
Cedric is wandering.
Irvin is hypocritical.
Brooke is optimistic.
Cedric is not thoughtful.
Cedric is not hypocritical.
Irvin is not wandering.
Irvin is not placid.
Lloyd is not optimistic.
Melody is not thoughtful.
Danna is not hypocritical.
Melody is placid.
Lloyd is placid.If there is someone who is not smoggy, then Lloyd is hypocritical.
Neil being hypocritical implies that Danna is placid and Danna is thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Irvin is wandering once knowing that Lloyd is thoughtful or Danna is placid.
It can be concluded that Neil is optimistic once knowing that Cedric is not hypocritical.
If someone is not placid or he is smoggy, then he is not hypocritical.
If someone is not optimistic or not hypocritical, then he is not thoughtful.
If there is someone who is both not optimistic and wandering, then Lloyd is not thoughtful.
Melody being not hypocritical or Melody being smoggy implies that Danna is not wandering.
Someone who is eithor not placid or not optimistic is always not hypocritical.
If someone is not smoggy and not placid, then he is not thoughtful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not thoughtful and not smoggy, then Neil is optimistic.
Neil is not smoggy if and only if Lloyd is optimistic and Danna is not placid.
|
Lloyd is thoughtful.
|
contradiction
|
Cedric is wandering.
Irvin is hypocritical.
Brooke is optimistic.
Cedric is not thoughtful.
Cedric is not hypocritical.
Irvin is not wandering.
Irvin is not placid.
Lloyd is not optimistic.
Melody is not thoughtful.
Danna is not hypocritical.
Melody is placid.
Lloyd is placid.If there is someone who is not smoggy, then Lloyd is hypocritical.
Neil being hypocritical implies that Danna is placid and Danna is thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Irvin is wandering once knowing that Lloyd is thoughtful or Danna is placid.
It can be concluded that Neil is optimistic once knowing that Cedric is not hypocritical.
If someone is not placid or he is smoggy, then he is not hypocritical.
If someone is not optimistic or not hypocritical, then he is not thoughtful.
If there is someone who is both not optimistic and wandering, then Lloyd is not thoughtful.
Melody being not hypocritical or Melody being smoggy implies that Danna is not wandering.
Someone who is eithor not placid or not optimistic is always not hypocritical.
If someone is not smoggy and not placid, then he is not thoughtful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not thoughtful and not smoggy, then Neil is optimistic.
Neil is not smoggy if and only if Lloyd is optimistic and Danna is not placid.
|
Lloyd is placid.
|
self_contradiction
|
Cedric is wandering.
Irvin is hypocritical.
Brooke is optimistic.
Cedric is not thoughtful.
Cedric is not hypocritical.
Irvin is not wandering.
Irvin is not placid.
Lloyd is not optimistic.
Melody is not thoughtful.
Danna is not hypocritical.
Melody is placid.
Lloyd is placid.If there is someone who is not smoggy, then Lloyd is hypocritical.
Neil being hypocritical implies that Danna is placid and Danna is thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Irvin is wandering once knowing that Lloyd is thoughtful or Danna is placid.
It can be concluded that Neil is optimistic once knowing that Cedric is not hypocritical.
If someone is not placid or he is smoggy, then he is not hypocritical.
If someone is not optimistic or not hypocritical, then he is not thoughtful.
If there is someone who is both not optimistic and wandering, then Lloyd is not thoughtful.
Melody being not hypocritical or Melody being smoggy implies that Danna is not wandering.
Someone who is eithor not placid or not optimistic is always not hypocritical.
If someone is not smoggy and not placid, then he is not thoughtful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not thoughtful and not smoggy, then Neil is optimistic.
Neil is not smoggy if and only if Lloyd is optimistic and Danna is not placid.
|
Lloyd is hypocritical.
|
self_contradiction
|
Cedric is wandering.
Irvin is hypocritical.
Brooke is optimistic.
Cedric is not thoughtful.
Cedric is not hypocritical.
Irvin is not wandering.
Irvin is not placid.
Lloyd is not optimistic.
Melody is not thoughtful.
Danna is not hypocritical.
Melody is placid.
Lloyd is placid.If there is someone who is not smoggy, then Lloyd is hypocritical.
Neil being hypocritical implies that Danna is placid and Danna is thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Irvin is wandering once knowing that Lloyd is thoughtful or Danna is placid.
It can be concluded that Neil is optimistic once knowing that Cedric is not hypocritical.
If someone is not placid or he is smoggy, then he is not hypocritical.
If someone is not optimistic or not hypocritical, then he is not thoughtful.
If there is someone who is both not optimistic and wandering, then Lloyd is not thoughtful.
Melody being not hypocritical or Melody being smoggy implies that Danna is not wandering.
Someone who is eithor not placid or not optimistic is always not hypocritical.
If someone is not smoggy and not placid, then he is not thoughtful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not thoughtful and not smoggy, then Neil is optimistic.
Neil is not smoggy if and only if Lloyd is optimistic and Danna is not placid.
|
Danna is not smoggy.
|
entailment
|
Cedric is wandering.
Irvin is hypocritical.
Brooke is optimistic.
Cedric is not thoughtful.
Cedric is not hypocritical.
Irvin is not wandering.
Irvin is not placid.
Lloyd is not optimistic.
Melody is not thoughtful.
Danna is not hypocritical.
Melody is placid.
Lloyd is placid.If there is someone who is not smoggy, then Lloyd is hypocritical.
Neil being hypocritical implies that Danna is placid and Danna is thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Irvin is wandering once knowing that Lloyd is thoughtful or Danna is placid.
It can be concluded that Neil is optimistic once knowing that Cedric is not hypocritical.
If someone is not placid or he is smoggy, then he is not hypocritical.
If someone is not optimistic or not hypocritical, then he is not thoughtful.
If there is someone who is both not optimistic and wandering, then Lloyd is not thoughtful.
Melody being not hypocritical or Melody being smoggy implies that Danna is not wandering.
Someone who is eithor not placid or not optimistic is always not hypocritical.
If someone is not smoggy and not placid, then he is not thoughtful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not thoughtful and not smoggy, then Neil is optimistic.
Neil is not smoggy if and only if Lloyd is optimistic and Danna is not placid.
|
Danna is optimistic.
|
neutral
|
Cedric is wandering.
Irvin is hypocritical.
Brooke is optimistic.
Cedric is not thoughtful.
Cedric is not hypocritical.
Irvin is not wandering.
Irvin is not placid.
Lloyd is not optimistic.
Melody is not thoughtful.
Danna is not hypocritical.
Melody is placid.
Lloyd is placid.If there is someone who is not smoggy, then Lloyd is hypocritical.
Neil being hypocritical implies that Danna is placid and Danna is thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Irvin is wandering once knowing that Lloyd is thoughtful or Danna is placid.
It can be concluded that Neil is optimistic once knowing that Cedric is not hypocritical.
If someone is not placid or he is smoggy, then he is not hypocritical.
If someone is not optimistic or not hypocritical, then he is not thoughtful.
If there is someone who is both not optimistic and wandering, then Lloyd is not thoughtful.
Melody being not hypocritical or Melody being smoggy implies that Danna is not wandering.
Someone who is eithor not placid or not optimistic is always not hypocritical.
If someone is not smoggy and not placid, then he is not thoughtful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not thoughtful and not smoggy, then Neil is optimistic.
Neil is not smoggy if and only if Lloyd is optimistic and Danna is not placid.
|
Brooke is not smoggy.
|
neutral
|
Cedric is wandering.
Irvin is hypocritical.
Brooke is optimistic.
Cedric is not thoughtful.
Cedric is not hypocritical.
Irvin is not wandering.
Irvin is not placid.
Lloyd is not optimistic.
Melody is not thoughtful.
Danna is not hypocritical.
Melody is placid.
Lloyd is placid.If there is someone who is not smoggy, then Lloyd is hypocritical.
Neil being hypocritical implies that Danna is placid and Danna is thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Irvin is wandering once knowing that Lloyd is thoughtful or Danna is placid.
It can be concluded that Neil is optimistic once knowing that Cedric is not hypocritical.
If someone is not placid or he is smoggy, then he is not hypocritical.
If someone is not optimistic or not hypocritical, then he is not thoughtful.
If there is someone who is both not optimistic and wandering, then Lloyd is not thoughtful.
Melody being not hypocritical or Melody being smoggy implies that Danna is not wandering.
Someone who is eithor not placid or not optimistic is always not hypocritical.
If someone is not smoggy and not placid, then he is not thoughtful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not thoughtful and not smoggy, then Neil is optimistic.
Neil is not smoggy if and only if Lloyd is optimistic and Danna is not placid.
|
Brooke is optimistic.
|
entailment
|
Cedric is wandering.
Irvin is hypocritical.
Brooke is optimistic.
Cedric is not thoughtful.
Cedric is not hypocritical.
Irvin is not wandering.
Irvin is not placid.
Lloyd is not optimistic.
Melody is not thoughtful.
Danna is not hypocritical.
Melody is placid.
Lloyd is placid.If there is someone who is not smoggy, then Lloyd is hypocritical.
Neil being hypocritical implies that Danna is placid and Danna is thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Irvin is wandering once knowing that Lloyd is thoughtful or Danna is placid.
It can be concluded that Neil is optimistic once knowing that Cedric is not hypocritical.
If someone is not placid or he is smoggy, then he is not hypocritical.
If someone is not optimistic or not hypocritical, then he is not thoughtful.
If there is someone who is both not optimistic and wandering, then Lloyd is not thoughtful.
Melody being not hypocritical or Melody being smoggy implies that Danna is not wandering.
Someone who is eithor not placid or not optimistic is always not hypocritical.
If someone is not smoggy and not placid, then he is not thoughtful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not thoughtful and not smoggy, then Neil is optimistic.
Neil is not smoggy if and only if Lloyd is optimistic and Danna is not placid.
|
Irvin is thoughtful.
|
contradiction
|
Cedric is wandering.
Irvin is hypocritical.
Brooke is optimistic.
Cedric is not thoughtful.
Cedric is not hypocritical.
Irvin is not wandering.
Irvin is not placid.
Lloyd is not optimistic.
Melody is not thoughtful.
Danna is not hypocritical.
Melody is placid.
Lloyd is placid.If there is someone who is not smoggy, then Lloyd is hypocritical.
Neil being hypocritical implies that Danna is placid and Danna is thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Irvin is wandering once knowing that Lloyd is thoughtful or Danna is placid.
It can be concluded that Neil is optimistic once knowing that Cedric is not hypocritical.
If someone is not placid or he is smoggy, then he is not hypocritical.
If someone is not optimistic or not hypocritical, then he is not thoughtful.
If there is someone who is both not optimistic and wandering, then Lloyd is not thoughtful.
Melody being not hypocritical or Melody being smoggy implies that Danna is not wandering.
Someone who is eithor not placid or not optimistic is always not hypocritical.
If someone is not smoggy and not placid, then he is not thoughtful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not thoughtful and not smoggy, then Neil is optimistic.
Neil is not smoggy if and only if Lloyd is optimistic and Danna is not placid.
|
Lloyd is smoggy.
|
contradiction
|
Cedric is wandering.
Irvin is hypocritical.
Brooke is optimistic.
Cedric is not thoughtful.
Cedric is not hypocritical.
Irvin is not wandering.
Irvin is not placid.
Lloyd is not optimistic.
Melody is not thoughtful.
Danna is not hypocritical.
Melody is placid.
Lloyd is placid.If there is someone who is not smoggy, then Lloyd is hypocritical.
Neil being hypocritical implies that Danna is placid and Danna is thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Irvin is wandering once knowing that Lloyd is thoughtful or Danna is placid.
It can be concluded that Neil is optimistic once knowing that Cedric is not hypocritical.
If someone is not placid or he is smoggy, then he is not hypocritical.
If someone is not optimistic or not hypocritical, then he is not thoughtful.
If there is someone who is both not optimistic and wandering, then Lloyd is not thoughtful.
Melody being not hypocritical or Melody being smoggy implies that Danna is not wandering.
Someone who is eithor not placid or not optimistic is always not hypocritical.
If someone is not smoggy and not placid, then he is not thoughtful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not thoughtful and not smoggy, then Neil is optimistic.
Neil is not smoggy if and only if Lloyd is optimistic and Danna is not placid.
|
Brooke is not thoughtful.
|
neutral
|
Cedric is wandering.
Irvin is hypocritical.
Brooke is optimistic.
Cedric is not thoughtful.
Cedric is not hypocritical.
Irvin is not wandering.
Irvin is not placid.
Lloyd is not optimistic.
Melody is not thoughtful.
Danna is not hypocritical.
Melody is placid.
Lloyd is placid.If there is someone who is not smoggy, then Lloyd is hypocritical.
Neil being hypocritical implies that Danna is placid and Danna is thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Irvin is wandering once knowing that Lloyd is thoughtful or Danna is placid.
It can be concluded that Neil is optimistic once knowing that Cedric is not hypocritical.
If someone is not placid or he is smoggy, then he is not hypocritical.
If someone is not optimistic or not hypocritical, then he is not thoughtful.
If there is someone who is both not optimistic and wandering, then Lloyd is not thoughtful.
Melody being not hypocritical or Melody being smoggy implies that Danna is not wandering.
Someone who is eithor not placid or not optimistic is always not hypocritical.
If someone is not smoggy and not placid, then he is not thoughtful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not thoughtful and not smoggy, then Neil is optimistic.
Neil is not smoggy if and only if Lloyd is optimistic and Danna is not placid.
|
Irvin is hypocritical.
|
self_contradiction
|
Cedric is wandering.
Irvin is hypocritical.
Brooke is optimistic.
Cedric is not thoughtful.
Cedric is not hypocritical.
Irvin is not wandering.
Irvin is not placid.
Lloyd is not optimistic.
Melody is not thoughtful.
Danna is not hypocritical.
Melody is placid.
Lloyd is placid.If there is someone who is not smoggy, then Lloyd is hypocritical.
Neil being hypocritical implies that Danna is placid and Danna is thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Irvin is wandering once knowing that Lloyd is thoughtful or Danna is placid.
It can be concluded that Neil is optimistic once knowing that Cedric is not hypocritical.
If someone is not placid or he is smoggy, then he is not hypocritical.
If someone is not optimistic or not hypocritical, then he is not thoughtful.
If there is someone who is both not optimistic and wandering, then Lloyd is not thoughtful.
Melody being not hypocritical or Melody being smoggy implies that Danna is not wandering.
Someone who is eithor not placid or not optimistic is always not hypocritical.
If someone is not smoggy and not placid, then he is not thoughtful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not thoughtful and not smoggy, then Neil is optimistic.
Neil is not smoggy if and only if Lloyd is optimistic and Danna is not placid.
|
Cedric is not hypocritical.
|
entailment
|
Cedric is wandering.
Irvin is hypocritical.
Brooke is optimistic.
Cedric is not thoughtful.
Cedric is not hypocritical.
Irvin is not wandering.
Irvin is not placid.
Lloyd is not optimistic.
Melody is not thoughtful.
Danna is not hypocritical.
Melody is placid.
Lloyd is placid.If there is someone who is not smoggy, then Lloyd is hypocritical.
Neil being hypocritical implies that Danna is placid and Danna is thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Irvin is wandering once knowing that Lloyd is thoughtful or Danna is placid.
It can be concluded that Neil is optimistic once knowing that Cedric is not hypocritical.
If someone is not placid or he is smoggy, then he is not hypocritical.
If someone is not optimistic or not hypocritical, then he is not thoughtful.
If there is someone who is both not optimistic and wandering, then Lloyd is not thoughtful.
Melody being not hypocritical or Melody being smoggy implies that Danna is not wandering.
Someone who is eithor not placid or not optimistic is always not hypocritical.
If someone is not smoggy and not placid, then he is not thoughtful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not thoughtful and not smoggy, then Neil is optimistic.
Neil is not smoggy if and only if Lloyd is optimistic and Danna is not placid.
|
Irvin is not hypocritical.
|
self_contradiction
|
Cedric is wandering.
Irvin is hypocritical.
Brooke is optimistic.
Cedric is not thoughtful.
Cedric is not hypocritical.
Irvin is not wandering.
Irvin is not placid.
Lloyd is not optimistic.
Melody is not thoughtful.
Danna is not hypocritical.
Melody is placid.
Lloyd is placid.If there is someone who is not smoggy, then Lloyd is hypocritical.
Neil being hypocritical implies that Danna is placid and Danna is thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Irvin is wandering once knowing that Lloyd is thoughtful or Danna is placid.
It can be concluded that Neil is optimistic once knowing that Cedric is not hypocritical.
If someone is not placid or he is smoggy, then he is not hypocritical.
If someone is not optimistic or not hypocritical, then he is not thoughtful.
If there is someone who is both not optimistic and wandering, then Lloyd is not thoughtful.
Melody being not hypocritical or Melody being smoggy implies that Danna is not wandering.
Someone who is eithor not placid or not optimistic is always not hypocritical.
If someone is not smoggy and not placid, then he is not thoughtful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not thoughtful and not smoggy, then Neil is optimistic.
Neil is not smoggy if and only if Lloyd is optimistic and Danna is not placid.
|
Melody is placid.
|
self_contradiction
|
Cedric is wandering.
Irvin is hypocritical.
Brooke is optimistic.
Cedric is not thoughtful.
Cedric is not hypocritical.
Irvin is not wandering.
Irvin is not placid.
Lloyd is not optimistic.
Melody is not thoughtful.
Danna is not hypocritical.
Melody is placid.
Lloyd is placid.If there is someone who is not smoggy, then Lloyd is hypocritical.
Neil being hypocritical implies that Danna is placid and Danna is thoughtful.
It can be concluded that Irvin is wandering once knowing that Lloyd is thoughtful or Danna is placid.
It can be concluded that Neil is optimistic once knowing that Cedric is not hypocritical.
If someone is not placid or he is smoggy, then he is not hypocritical.
If someone is not optimistic or not hypocritical, then he is not thoughtful.
If there is someone who is both not optimistic and wandering, then Lloyd is not thoughtful.
Melody being not hypocritical or Melody being smoggy implies that Danna is not wandering.
Someone who is eithor not placid or not optimistic is always not hypocritical.
If someone is not smoggy and not placid, then he is not thoughtful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not thoughtful and not smoggy, then Neil is optimistic.
Neil is not smoggy if and only if Lloyd is optimistic and Danna is not placid.
|
Cedric is not placid.
|
entailment
|
Kimball is thoughtful.
Hubert is typical.
Herbert is not typical.
Ricardo is excited.
Peter is better.
Bruce is better.
Hubert is not better.
Peter is swift.
Hubert is not excited.
Bruce is not typical.
Hubert is distracted.
Hubert is swift.If there is at least one people who is better, then Kimball is not swift and Kimberly is not excited.
Someone being not better is equivalent to being not thoughtful.
If there is at least one people who is not better or thoughtful, then Bruce is not distracted.
If Kimball is not distracted or Kimberly is excited, then Herbert is not swift.
Someone who is not excited is always both typical and not distracted.
If there is at least one people who is not better, then Bruce is not typical.
If there is someone who is thoughtful, then Ricardo is not swift.
If there is someone who is both typical and not thoughtful, then Peter is not excited.
If someone is thoughtful and not swift, then he is not distracted, and vice versa.
If Kimball is typical, then Peter is not excited.
If everyone is swift, then Herbert is not better and Kimball is thoughtful.
If Ricardo is not typical and Herbert is not distracted, then Peter is not thoughtful and Kimball is swift, and vice versa.
|
Ricardo is thoughtful.
|
neutral
|
Kimball is thoughtful.
Hubert is typical.
Herbert is not typical.
Ricardo is excited.
Peter is better.
Bruce is better.
Hubert is not better.
Peter is swift.
Hubert is not excited.
Bruce is not typical.
Hubert is distracted.
Hubert is swift.If there is at least one people who is better, then Kimball is not swift and Kimberly is not excited.
Someone being not better is equivalent to being not thoughtful.
If there is at least one people who is not better or thoughtful, then Bruce is not distracted.
If Kimball is not distracted or Kimberly is excited, then Herbert is not swift.
Someone who is not excited is always both typical and not distracted.
If there is at least one people who is not better, then Bruce is not typical.
If there is someone who is thoughtful, then Ricardo is not swift.
If there is someone who is both typical and not thoughtful, then Peter is not excited.
If someone is thoughtful and not swift, then he is not distracted, and vice versa.
If Kimball is typical, then Peter is not excited.
If everyone is swift, then Herbert is not better and Kimball is thoughtful.
If Ricardo is not typical and Herbert is not distracted, then Peter is not thoughtful and Kimball is swift, and vice versa.
|
Ricardo is not typical.
|
neutral
|
Kimball is thoughtful.
Hubert is typical.
Herbert is not typical.
Ricardo is excited.
Peter is better.
Bruce is better.
Hubert is not better.
Peter is swift.
Hubert is not excited.
Bruce is not typical.
Hubert is distracted.
Hubert is swift.If there is at least one people who is better, then Kimball is not swift and Kimberly is not excited.
Someone being not better is equivalent to being not thoughtful.
If there is at least one people who is not better or thoughtful, then Bruce is not distracted.
If Kimball is not distracted or Kimberly is excited, then Herbert is not swift.
Someone who is not excited is always both typical and not distracted.
If there is at least one people who is not better, then Bruce is not typical.
If there is someone who is thoughtful, then Ricardo is not swift.
If there is someone who is both typical and not thoughtful, then Peter is not excited.
If someone is thoughtful and not swift, then he is not distracted, and vice versa.
If Kimball is typical, then Peter is not excited.
If everyone is swift, then Herbert is not better and Kimball is thoughtful.
If Ricardo is not typical and Herbert is not distracted, then Peter is not thoughtful and Kimball is swift, and vice versa.
|
Kimberly is not distracted.
|
entailment
|
Kimball is thoughtful.
Hubert is typical.
Herbert is not typical.
Ricardo is excited.
Peter is better.
Bruce is better.
Hubert is not better.
Peter is swift.
Hubert is not excited.
Bruce is not typical.
Hubert is distracted.
Hubert is swift.If there is at least one people who is better, then Kimball is not swift and Kimberly is not excited.
Someone being not better is equivalent to being not thoughtful.
If there is at least one people who is not better or thoughtful, then Bruce is not distracted.
If Kimball is not distracted or Kimberly is excited, then Herbert is not swift.
Someone who is not excited is always both typical and not distracted.
If there is at least one people who is not better, then Bruce is not typical.
If there is someone who is thoughtful, then Ricardo is not swift.
If there is someone who is both typical and not thoughtful, then Peter is not excited.
If someone is thoughtful and not swift, then he is not distracted, and vice versa.
If Kimball is typical, then Peter is not excited.
If everyone is swift, then Herbert is not better and Kimball is thoughtful.
If Ricardo is not typical and Herbert is not distracted, then Peter is not thoughtful and Kimball is swift, and vice versa.
|
Ricardo is better.
|
neutral
|
Kimball is thoughtful.
Hubert is typical.
Herbert is not typical.
Ricardo is excited.
Peter is better.
Bruce is better.
Hubert is not better.
Peter is swift.
Hubert is not excited.
Bruce is not typical.
Hubert is distracted.
Hubert is swift.If there is at least one people who is better, then Kimball is not swift and Kimberly is not excited.
Someone being not better is equivalent to being not thoughtful.
If there is at least one people who is not better or thoughtful, then Bruce is not distracted.
If Kimball is not distracted or Kimberly is excited, then Herbert is not swift.
Someone who is not excited is always both typical and not distracted.
If there is at least one people who is not better, then Bruce is not typical.
If there is someone who is thoughtful, then Ricardo is not swift.
If there is someone who is both typical and not thoughtful, then Peter is not excited.
If someone is thoughtful and not swift, then he is not distracted, and vice versa.
If Kimball is typical, then Peter is not excited.
If everyone is swift, then Herbert is not better and Kimball is thoughtful.
If Ricardo is not typical and Herbert is not distracted, then Peter is not thoughtful and Kimball is swift, and vice versa.
|
Hubert is swift.
|
self_contradiction
|
Kimball is thoughtful.
Hubert is typical.
Herbert is not typical.
Ricardo is excited.
Peter is better.
Bruce is better.
Hubert is not better.
Peter is swift.
Hubert is not excited.
Bruce is not typical.
Hubert is distracted.
Hubert is swift.If there is at least one people who is better, then Kimball is not swift and Kimberly is not excited.
Someone being not better is equivalent to being not thoughtful.
If there is at least one people who is not better or thoughtful, then Bruce is not distracted.
If Kimball is not distracted or Kimberly is excited, then Herbert is not swift.
Someone who is not excited is always both typical and not distracted.
If there is at least one people who is not better, then Bruce is not typical.
If there is someone who is thoughtful, then Ricardo is not swift.
If there is someone who is both typical and not thoughtful, then Peter is not excited.
If someone is thoughtful and not swift, then he is not distracted, and vice versa.
If Kimball is typical, then Peter is not excited.
If everyone is swift, then Herbert is not better and Kimball is thoughtful.
If Ricardo is not typical and Herbert is not distracted, then Peter is not thoughtful and Kimball is swift, and vice versa.
|
Ricardo is typical.
|
neutral
|
Kimball is thoughtful.
Hubert is typical.
Herbert is not typical.
Ricardo is excited.
Peter is better.
Bruce is better.
Hubert is not better.
Peter is swift.
Hubert is not excited.
Bruce is not typical.
Hubert is distracted.
Hubert is swift.If there is at least one people who is better, then Kimball is not swift and Kimberly is not excited.
Someone being not better is equivalent to being not thoughtful.
If there is at least one people who is not better or thoughtful, then Bruce is not distracted.
If Kimball is not distracted or Kimberly is excited, then Herbert is not swift.
Someone who is not excited is always both typical and not distracted.
If there is at least one people who is not better, then Bruce is not typical.
If there is someone who is thoughtful, then Ricardo is not swift.
If there is someone who is both typical and not thoughtful, then Peter is not excited.
If someone is thoughtful and not swift, then he is not distracted, and vice versa.
If Kimball is typical, then Peter is not excited.
If everyone is swift, then Herbert is not better and Kimball is thoughtful.
If Ricardo is not typical and Herbert is not distracted, then Peter is not thoughtful and Kimball is swift, and vice versa.
|
Kimball is not thoughtful.
|
contradiction
|
Kimball is thoughtful.
Hubert is typical.
Herbert is not typical.
Ricardo is excited.
Peter is better.
Bruce is better.
Hubert is not better.
Peter is swift.
Hubert is not excited.
Bruce is not typical.
Hubert is distracted.
Hubert is swift.If there is at least one people who is better, then Kimball is not swift and Kimberly is not excited.
Someone being not better is equivalent to being not thoughtful.
If there is at least one people who is not better or thoughtful, then Bruce is not distracted.
If Kimball is not distracted or Kimberly is excited, then Herbert is not swift.
Someone who is not excited is always both typical and not distracted.
If there is at least one people who is not better, then Bruce is not typical.
If there is someone who is thoughtful, then Ricardo is not swift.
If there is someone who is both typical and not thoughtful, then Peter is not excited.
If someone is thoughtful and not swift, then he is not distracted, and vice versa.
If Kimball is typical, then Peter is not excited.
If everyone is swift, then Herbert is not better and Kimball is thoughtful.
If Ricardo is not typical and Herbert is not distracted, then Peter is not thoughtful and Kimball is swift, and vice versa.
|
Hubert is thoughtful.
|
self_contradiction
|
Kimball is thoughtful.
Hubert is typical.
Herbert is not typical.
Ricardo is excited.
Peter is better.
Bruce is better.
Hubert is not better.
Peter is swift.
Hubert is not excited.
Bruce is not typical.
Hubert is distracted.
Hubert is swift.If there is at least one people who is better, then Kimball is not swift and Kimberly is not excited.
Someone being not better is equivalent to being not thoughtful.
If there is at least one people who is not better or thoughtful, then Bruce is not distracted.
If Kimball is not distracted or Kimberly is excited, then Herbert is not swift.
Someone who is not excited is always both typical and not distracted.
If there is at least one people who is not better, then Bruce is not typical.
If there is someone who is thoughtful, then Ricardo is not swift.
If there is someone who is both typical and not thoughtful, then Peter is not excited.
If someone is thoughtful and not swift, then he is not distracted, and vice versa.
If Kimball is typical, then Peter is not excited.
If everyone is swift, then Herbert is not better and Kimball is thoughtful.
If Ricardo is not typical and Herbert is not distracted, then Peter is not thoughtful and Kimball is swift, and vice versa.
|
Bruce is distracted.
|
contradiction
|
Kimball is thoughtful.
Hubert is typical.
Herbert is not typical.
Ricardo is excited.
Peter is better.
Bruce is better.
Hubert is not better.
Peter is swift.
Hubert is not excited.
Bruce is not typical.
Hubert is distracted.
Hubert is swift.If there is at least one people who is better, then Kimball is not swift and Kimberly is not excited.
Someone being not better is equivalent to being not thoughtful.
If there is at least one people who is not better or thoughtful, then Bruce is not distracted.
If Kimball is not distracted or Kimberly is excited, then Herbert is not swift.
Someone who is not excited is always both typical and not distracted.
If there is at least one people who is not better, then Bruce is not typical.
If there is someone who is thoughtful, then Ricardo is not swift.
If there is someone who is both typical and not thoughtful, then Peter is not excited.
If someone is thoughtful and not swift, then he is not distracted, and vice versa.
If Kimball is typical, then Peter is not excited.
If everyone is swift, then Herbert is not better and Kimball is thoughtful.
If Ricardo is not typical and Herbert is not distracted, then Peter is not thoughtful and Kimball is swift, and vice versa.
|
Bruce is swift.
|
contradiction
|
Kimball is thoughtful.
Hubert is typical.
Herbert is not typical.
Ricardo is excited.
Peter is better.
Bruce is better.
Hubert is not better.
Peter is swift.
Hubert is not excited.
Bruce is not typical.
Hubert is distracted.
Hubert is swift.If there is at least one people who is better, then Kimball is not swift and Kimberly is not excited.
Someone being not better is equivalent to being not thoughtful.
If there is at least one people who is not better or thoughtful, then Bruce is not distracted.
If Kimball is not distracted or Kimberly is excited, then Herbert is not swift.
Someone who is not excited is always both typical and not distracted.
If there is at least one people who is not better, then Bruce is not typical.
If there is someone who is thoughtful, then Ricardo is not swift.
If there is someone who is both typical and not thoughtful, then Peter is not excited.
If someone is thoughtful and not swift, then he is not distracted, and vice versa.
If Kimball is typical, then Peter is not excited.
If everyone is swift, then Herbert is not better and Kimball is thoughtful.
If Ricardo is not typical and Herbert is not distracted, then Peter is not thoughtful and Kimball is swift, and vice versa.
|
Herbert is not typical.
|
entailment
|
Kimball is thoughtful.
Hubert is typical.
Herbert is not typical.
Ricardo is excited.
Peter is better.
Bruce is better.
Hubert is not better.
Peter is swift.
Hubert is not excited.
Bruce is not typical.
Hubert is distracted.
Hubert is swift.If there is at least one people who is better, then Kimball is not swift and Kimberly is not excited.
Someone being not better is equivalent to being not thoughtful.
If there is at least one people who is not better or thoughtful, then Bruce is not distracted.
If Kimball is not distracted or Kimberly is excited, then Herbert is not swift.
Someone who is not excited is always both typical and not distracted.
If there is at least one people who is not better, then Bruce is not typical.
If there is someone who is thoughtful, then Ricardo is not swift.
If there is someone who is both typical and not thoughtful, then Peter is not excited.
If someone is thoughtful and not swift, then he is not distracted, and vice versa.
If Kimball is typical, then Peter is not excited.
If everyone is swift, then Herbert is not better and Kimball is thoughtful.
If Ricardo is not typical and Herbert is not distracted, then Peter is not thoughtful and Kimball is swift, and vice versa.
|
Hubert is typical.
|
entailment
|
Kimball is thoughtful.
Hubert is typical.
Herbert is not typical.
Ricardo is excited.
Peter is better.
Bruce is better.
Hubert is not better.
Peter is swift.
Hubert is not excited.
Bruce is not typical.
Hubert is distracted.
Hubert is swift.If there is at least one people who is better, then Kimball is not swift and Kimberly is not excited.
Someone being not better is equivalent to being not thoughtful.
If there is at least one people who is not better or thoughtful, then Bruce is not distracted.
If Kimball is not distracted or Kimberly is excited, then Herbert is not swift.
Someone who is not excited is always both typical and not distracted.
If there is at least one people who is not better, then Bruce is not typical.
If there is someone who is thoughtful, then Ricardo is not swift.
If there is someone who is both typical and not thoughtful, then Peter is not excited.
If someone is thoughtful and not swift, then he is not distracted, and vice versa.
If Kimball is typical, then Peter is not excited.
If everyone is swift, then Herbert is not better and Kimball is thoughtful.
If Ricardo is not typical and Herbert is not distracted, then Peter is not thoughtful and Kimball is swift, and vice versa.
|
Hubert is not distracted.
|
self_contradiction
|
Kimball is thoughtful.
Hubert is typical.
Herbert is not typical.
Ricardo is excited.
Peter is better.
Bruce is better.
Hubert is not better.
Peter is swift.
Hubert is not excited.
Bruce is not typical.
Hubert is distracted.
Hubert is swift.If there is at least one people who is better, then Kimball is not swift and Kimberly is not excited.
Someone being not better is equivalent to being not thoughtful.
If there is at least one people who is not better or thoughtful, then Bruce is not distracted.
If Kimball is not distracted or Kimberly is excited, then Herbert is not swift.
Someone who is not excited is always both typical and not distracted.
If there is at least one people who is not better, then Bruce is not typical.
If there is someone who is thoughtful, then Ricardo is not swift.
If there is someone who is both typical and not thoughtful, then Peter is not excited.
If someone is thoughtful and not swift, then he is not distracted, and vice versa.
If Kimball is typical, then Peter is not excited.
If everyone is swift, then Herbert is not better and Kimball is thoughtful.
If Ricardo is not typical and Herbert is not distracted, then Peter is not thoughtful and Kimball is swift, and vice versa.
|
Kimball is better.
|
neutral
|
Kimball is thoughtful.
Hubert is typical.
Herbert is not typical.
Ricardo is excited.
Peter is better.
Bruce is better.
Hubert is not better.
Peter is swift.
Hubert is not excited.
Bruce is not typical.
Hubert is distracted.
Hubert is swift.If there is at least one people who is better, then Kimball is not swift and Kimberly is not excited.
Someone being not better is equivalent to being not thoughtful.
If there is at least one people who is not better or thoughtful, then Bruce is not distracted.
If Kimball is not distracted or Kimberly is excited, then Herbert is not swift.
Someone who is not excited is always both typical and not distracted.
If there is at least one people who is not better, then Bruce is not typical.
If there is someone who is thoughtful, then Ricardo is not swift.
If there is someone who is both typical and not thoughtful, then Peter is not excited.
If someone is thoughtful and not swift, then he is not distracted, and vice versa.
If Kimball is typical, then Peter is not excited.
If everyone is swift, then Herbert is not better and Kimball is thoughtful.
If Ricardo is not typical and Herbert is not distracted, then Peter is not thoughtful and Kimball is swift, and vice versa.
|
Herbert is not swift.
|
entailment
|
Kimball is thoughtful.
Hubert is typical.
Herbert is not typical.
Ricardo is excited.
Peter is better.
Bruce is better.
Hubert is not better.
Peter is swift.
Hubert is not excited.
Bruce is not typical.
Hubert is distracted.
Hubert is swift.If there is at least one people who is better, then Kimball is not swift and Kimberly is not excited.
Someone being not better is equivalent to being not thoughtful.
If there is at least one people who is not better or thoughtful, then Bruce is not distracted.
If Kimball is not distracted or Kimberly is excited, then Herbert is not swift.
Someone who is not excited is always both typical and not distracted.
If there is at least one people who is not better, then Bruce is not typical.
If there is someone who is thoughtful, then Ricardo is not swift.
If there is someone who is both typical and not thoughtful, then Peter is not excited.
If someone is thoughtful and not swift, then he is not distracted, and vice versa.
If Kimball is typical, then Peter is not excited.
If everyone is swift, then Herbert is not better and Kimball is thoughtful.
If Ricardo is not typical and Herbert is not distracted, then Peter is not thoughtful and Kimball is swift, and vice versa.
|
Hubert is not swift.
|
self_contradiction
|
Kimball is thoughtful.
Hubert is typical.
Herbert is not typical.
Ricardo is excited.
Peter is better.
Bruce is better.
Hubert is not better.
Peter is swift.
Hubert is not excited.
Bruce is not typical.
Hubert is distracted.
Hubert is swift.If there is at least one people who is better, then Kimball is not swift and Kimberly is not excited.
Someone being not better is equivalent to being not thoughtful.
If there is at least one people who is not better or thoughtful, then Bruce is not distracted.
If Kimball is not distracted or Kimberly is excited, then Herbert is not swift.
Someone who is not excited is always both typical and not distracted.
If there is at least one people who is not better, then Bruce is not typical.
If there is someone who is thoughtful, then Ricardo is not swift.
If there is someone who is both typical and not thoughtful, then Peter is not excited.
If someone is thoughtful and not swift, then he is not distracted, and vice versa.
If Kimball is typical, then Peter is not excited.
If everyone is swift, then Herbert is not better and Kimball is thoughtful.
If Ricardo is not typical and Herbert is not distracted, then Peter is not thoughtful and Kimball is swift, and vice versa.
|
Hubert is distracted.
|
self_contradiction
|
Kimball is thoughtful.
Hubert is typical.
Herbert is not typical.
Ricardo is excited.
Peter is better.
Bruce is better.
Hubert is not better.
Peter is swift.
Hubert is not excited.
Bruce is not typical.
Hubert is distracted.
Hubert is swift.If there is at least one people who is better, then Kimball is not swift and Kimberly is not excited.
Someone being not better is equivalent to being not thoughtful.
If there is at least one people who is not better or thoughtful, then Bruce is not distracted.
If Kimball is not distracted or Kimberly is excited, then Herbert is not swift.
Someone who is not excited is always both typical and not distracted.
If there is at least one people who is not better, then Bruce is not typical.
If there is someone who is thoughtful, then Ricardo is not swift.
If there is someone who is both typical and not thoughtful, then Peter is not excited.
If someone is thoughtful and not swift, then he is not distracted, and vice versa.
If Kimball is typical, then Peter is not excited.
If everyone is swift, then Herbert is not better and Kimball is thoughtful.
If Ricardo is not typical and Herbert is not distracted, then Peter is not thoughtful and Kimball is swift, and vice versa.
|
Bruce is thoughtful.
|
entailment
|
Kimball is thoughtful.
Hubert is typical.
Herbert is not typical.
Ricardo is excited.
Peter is better.
Bruce is better.
Hubert is not better.
Peter is swift.
Hubert is not excited.
Bruce is not typical.
Hubert is distracted.
Hubert is swift.If there is at least one people who is better, then Kimball is not swift and Kimberly is not excited.
Someone being not better is equivalent to being not thoughtful.
If there is at least one people who is not better or thoughtful, then Bruce is not distracted.
If Kimball is not distracted or Kimberly is excited, then Herbert is not swift.
Someone who is not excited is always both typical and not distracted.
If there is at least one people who is not better, then Bruce is not typical.
If there is someone who is thoughtful, then Ricardo is not swift.
If there is someone who is both typical and not thoughtful, then Peter is not excited.
If someone is thoughtful and not swift, then he is not distracted, and vice versa.
If Kimball is typical, then Peter is not excited.
If everyone is swift, then Herbert is not better and Kimball is thoughtful.
If Ricardo is not typical and Herbert is not distracted, then Peter is not thoughtful and Kimball is swift, and vice versa.
|
Kimball is swift.
|
contradiction
|
Kimball is thoughtful.
Hubert is typical.
Herbert is not typical.
Ricardo is excited.
Peter is better.
Bruce is better.
Hubert is not better.
Peter is swift.
Hubert is not excited.
Bruce is not typical.
Hubert is distracted.
Hubert is swift.If there is at least one people who is better, then Kimball is not swift and Kimberly is not excited.
Someone being not better is equivalent to being not thoughtful.
If there is at least one people who is not better or thoughtful, then Bruce is not distracted.
If Kimball is not distracted or Kimberly is excited, then Herbert is not swift.
Someone who is not excited is always both typical and not distracted.
If there is at least one people who is not better, then Bruce is not typical.
If there is someone who is thoughtful, then Ricardo is not swift.
If there is someone who is both typical and not thoughtful, then Peter is not excited.
If someone is thoughtful and not swift, then he is not distracted, and vice versa.
If Kimball is typical, then Peter is not excited.
If everyone is swift, then Herbert is not better and Kimball is thoughtful.
If Ricardo is not typical and Herbert is not distracted, then Peter is not thoughtful and Kimball is swift, and vice versa.
|
Kimberly is not typical.
|
contradiction
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.