premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Shamus is quaint.
Shamus is not entire.
Halden is expensive.
Lucille is not quaint.
Joshua is grumpy.
Halden is naughty.
Matthew is naughty.
Lucille is grumpy.
Lucille is naughty.
Shamus is not grumpy.
Joshua is timid.
Joe is not timid.If Halden is entire, then Randolph is expensive and Lucille is not timid, and vice versa.
Someone who is not naughty is always both not timid and not grumpy.
If someone is naughty, then he is entire, and vice versa.
If Joshua is not expensive and Joe is quaint, then Lucille is naughty and Randolph is grumpy.
Someone who is eithor not quaint or not expensive is always grumpy.
If there is someone who is either not naughty or not timid, then Halden is not quaint and Joshua is expensive.
Someone is naughty if and only if he is expensive.
As long as someone is not timid, he is not naughty and not grumpy.
If someone is not timid and expensive, then he is both not entire and not quaint, and vice versa.
Matthew being not expensive is equivalent to Joe being not timid.
If someone is not quaint, then he is both entire and not grumpy.
If Matthew is expensive or Randolph is entire, then Shamus is timid. | Joshua is not entire. | contradiction |
Shamus is quaint.
Shamus is not entire.
Halden is expensive.
Lucille is not quaint.
Joshua is grumpy.
Halden is naughty.
Matthew is naughty.
Lucille is grumpy.
Lucille is naughty.
Shamus is not grumpy.
Joshua is timid.
Joe is not timid.If Halden is entire, then Randolph is expensive and Lucille is not timid, and vice versa.
Someone who is not naughty is always both not timid and not grumpy.
If someone is naughty, then he is entire, and vice versa.
If Joshua is not expensive and Joe is quaint, then Lucille is naughty and Randolph is grumpy.
Someone who is eithor not quaint or not expensive is always grumpy.
If there is someone who is either not naughty or not timid, then Halden is not quaint and Joshua is expensive.
Someone is naughty if and only if he is expensive.
As long as someone is not timid, he is not naughty and not grumpy.
If someone is not timid and expensive, then he is both not entire and not quaint, and vice versa.
Matthew being not expensive is equivalent to Joe being not timid.
If someone is not quaint, then he is both entire and not grumpy.
If Matthew is expensive or Randolph is entire, then Shamus is timid. | Lucille is not quaint. | entailment |
Shamus is quaint.
Shamus is not entire.
Halden is expensive.
Lucille is not quaint.
Joshua is grumpy.
Halden is naughty.
Matthew is naughty.
Lucille is grumpy.
Lucille is naughty.
Shamus is not grumpy.
Joshua is timid.
Joe is not timid.If Halden is entire, then Randolph is expensive and Lucille is not timid, and vice versa.
Someone who is not naughty is always both not timid and not grumpy.
If someone is naughty, then he is entire, and vice versa.
If Joshua is not expensive and Joe is quaint, then Lucille is naughty and Randolph is grumpy.
Someone who is eithor not quaint or not expensive is always grumpy.
If there is someone who is either not naughty or not timid, then Halden is not quaint and Joshua is expensive.
Someone is naughty if and only if he is expensive.
As long as someone is not timid, he is not naughty and not grumpy.
If someone is not timid and expensive, then he is both not entire and not quaint, and vice versa.
Matthew being not expensive is equivalent to Joe being not timid.
If someone is not quaint, then he is both entire and not grumpy.
If Matthew is expensive or Randolph is entire, then Shamus is timid. | Joshua is quaint. | neutral |
Shamus is quaint.
Shamus is not entire.
Halden is expensive.
Lucille is not quaint.
Joshua is grumpy.
Halden is naughty.
Matthew is naughty.
Lucille is grumpy.
Lucille is naughty.
Shamus is not grumpy.
Joshua is timid.
Joe is not timid.If Halden is entire, then Randolph is expensive and Lucille is not timid, and vice versa.
Someone who is not naughty is always both not timid and not grumpy.
If someone is naughty, then he is entire, and vice versa.
If Joshua is not expensive and Joe is quaint, then Lucille is naughty and Randolph is grumpy.
Someone who is eithor not quaint or not expensive is always grumpy.
If there is someone who is either not naughty or not timid, then Halden is not quaint and Joshua is expensive.
Someone is naughty if and only if he is expensive.
As long as someone is not timid, he is not naughty and not grumpy.
If someone is not timid and expensive, then he is both not entire and not quaint, and vice versa.
Matthew being not expensive is equivalent to Joe being not timid.
If someone is not quaint, then he is both entire and not grumpy.
If Matthew is expensive or Randolph is entire, then Shamus is timid. | Randolph is expensive. | entailment |
Shamus is quaint.
Shamus is not entire.
Halden is expensive.
Lucille is not quaint.
Joshua is grumpy.
Halden is naughty.
Matthew is naughty.
Lucille is grumpy.
Lucille is naughty.
Shamus is not grumpy.
Joshua is timid.
Joe is not timid.If Halden is entire, then Randolph is expensive and Lucille is not timid, and vice versa.
Someone who is not naughty is always both not timid and not grumpy.
If someone is naughty, then he is entire, and vice versa.
If Joshua is not expensive and Joe is quaint, then Lucille is naughty and Randolph is grumpy.
Someone who is eithor not quaint or not expensive is always grumpy.
If there is someone who is either not naughty or not timid, then Halden is not quaint and Joshua is expensive.
Someone is naughty if and only if he is expensive.
As long as someone is not timid, he is not naughty and not grumpy.
If someone is not timid and expensive, then he is both not entire and not quaint, and vice versa.
Matthew being not expensive is equivalent to Joe being not timid.
If someone is not quaint, then he is both entire and not grumpy.
If Matthew is expensive or Randolph is entire, then Shamus is timid. | Randolph is not expensive. | contradiction |
Shamus is quaint.
Shamus is not entire.
Halden is expensive.
Lucille is not quaint.
Joshua is grumpy.
Halden is naughty.
Matthew is naughty.
Lucille is grumpy.
Lucille is naughty.
Shamus is not grumpy.
Joshua is timid.
Joe is not timid.If Halden is entire, then Randolph is expensive and Lucille is not timid, and vice versa.
Someone who is not naughty is always both not timid and not grumpy.
If someone is naughty, then he is entire, and vice versa.
If Joshua is not expensive and Joe is quaint, then Lucille is naughty and Randolph is grumpy.
Someone who is eithor not quaint or not expensive is always grumpy.
If there is someone who is either not naughty or not timid, then Halden is not quaint and Joshua is expensive.
Someone is naughty if and only if he is expensive.
As long as someone is not timid, he is not naughty and not grumpy.
If someone is not timid and expensive, then he is both not entire and not quaint, and vice versa.
Matthew being not expensive is equivalent to Joe being not timid.
If someone is not quaint, then he is both entire and not grumpy.
If Matthew is expensive or Randolph is entire, then Shamus is timid. | Shamus is not naughty. | neutral |
Shamus is quaint.
Shamus is not entire.
Halden is expensive.
Lucille is not quaint.
Joshua is grumpy.
Halden is naughty.
Matthew is naughty.
Lucille is grumpy.
Lucille is naughty.
Shamus is not grumpy.
Joshua is timid.
Joe is not timid.If Halden is entire, then Randolph is expensive and Lucille is not timid, and vice versa.
Someone who is not naughty is always both not timid and not grumpy.
If someone is naughty, then he is entire, and vice versa.
If Joshua is not expensive and Joe is quaint, then Lucille is naughty and Randolph is grumpy.
Someone who is eithor not quaint or not expensive is always grumpy.
If there is someone who is either not naughty or not timid, then Halden is not quaint and Joshua is expensive.
Someone is naughty if and only if he is expensive.
As long as someone is not timid, he is not naughty and not grumpy.
If someone is not timid and expensive, then he is both not entire and not quaint, and vice versa.
Matthew being not expensive is equivalent to Joe being not timid.
If someone is not quaint, then he is both entire and not grumpy.
If Matthew is expensive or Randolph is entire, then Shamus is timid. | Lucille is naughty. | self_contradiction |
Shamus is quaint.
Shamus is not entire.
Halden is expensive.
Lucille is not quaint.
Joshua is grumpy.
Halden is naughty.
Matthew is naughty.
Lucille is grumpy.
Lucille is naughty.
Shamus is not grumpy.
Joshua is timid.
Joe is not timid.If Halden is entire, then Randolph is expensive and Lucille is not timid, and vice versa.
Someone who is not naughty is always both not timid and not grumpy.
If someone is naughty, then he is entire, and vice versa.
If Joshua is not expensive and Joe is quaint, then Lucille is naughty and Randolph is grumpy.
Someone who is eithor not quaint or not expensive is always grumpy.
If there is someone who is either not naughty or not timid, then Halden is not quaint and Joshua is expensive.
Someone is naughty if and only if he is expensive.
As long as someone is not timid, he is not naughty and not grumpy.
If someone is not timid and expensive, then he is both not entire and not quaint, and vice versa.
Matthew being not expensive is equivalent to Joe being not timid.
If someone is not quaint, then he is both entire and not grumpy.
If Matthew is expensive or Randolph is entire, then Shamus is timid. | Halden is not quaint. | entailment |
Shamus is quaint.
Shamus is not entire.
Halden is expensive.
Lucille is not quaint.
Joshua is grumpy.
Halden is naughty.
Matthew is naughty.
Lucille is grumpy.
Lucille is naughty.
Shamus is not grumpy.
Joshua is timid.
Joe is not timid.If Halden is entire, then Randolph is expensive and Lucille is not timid, and vice versa.
Someone who is not naughty is always both not timid and not grumpy.
If someone is naughty, then he is entire, and vice versa.
If Joshua is not expensive and Joe is quaint, then Lucille is naughty and Randolph is grumpy.
Someone who is eithor not quaint or not expensive is always grumpy.
If there is someone who is either not naughty or not timid, then Halden is not quaint and Joshua is expensive.
Someone is naughty if and only if he is expensive.
As long as someone is not timid, he is not naughty and not grumpy.
If someone is not timid and expensive, then he is both not entire and not quaint, and vice versa.
Matthew being not expensive is equivalent to Joe being not timid.
If someone is not quaint, then he is both entire and not grumpy.
If Matthew is expensive or Randolph is entire, then Shamus is timid. | Joe is entire. | neutral |
Shamus is quaint.
Shamus is not entire.
Halden is expensive.
Lucille is not quaint.
Joshua is grumpy.
Halden is naughty.
Matthew is naughty.
Lucille is grumpy.
Lucille is naughty.
Shamus is not grumpy.
Joshua is timid.
Joe is not timid.If Halden is entire, then Randolph is expensive and Lucille is not timid, and vice versa.
Someone who is not naughty is always both not timid and not grumpy.
If someone is naughty, then he is entire, and vice versa.
If Joshua is not expensive and Joe is quaint, then Lucille is naughty and Randolph is grumpy.
Someone who is eithor not quaint or not expensive is always grumpy.
If there is someone who is either not naughty or not timid, then Halden is not quaint and Joshua is expensive.
Someone is naughty if and only if he is expensive.
As long as someone is not timid, he is not naughty and not grumpy.
If someone is not timid and expensive, then he is both not entire and not quaint, and vice versa.
Matthew being not expensive is equivalent to Joe being not timid.
If someone is not quaint, then he is both entire and not grumpy.
If Matthew is expensive or Randolph is entire, then Shamus is timid. | Shamus is naughty. | neutral |
Shamus is quaint.
Shamus is not entire.
Halden is expensive.
Lucille is not quaint.
Joshua is grumpy.
Halden is naughty.
Matthew is naughty.
Lucille is grumpy.
Lucille is naughty.
Shamus is not grumpy.
Joshua is timid.
Joe is not timid.If Halden is entire, then Randolph is expensive and Lucille is not timid, and vice versa.
Someone who is not naughty is always both not timid and not grumpy.
If someone is naughty, then he is entire, and vice versa.
If Joshua is not expensive and Joe is quaint, then Lucille is naughty and Randolph is grumpy.
Someone who is eithor not quaint or not expensive is always grumpy.
If there is someone who is either not naughty or not timid, then Halden is not quaint and Joshua is expensive.
Someone is naughty if and only if he is expensive.
As long as someone is not timid, he is not naughty and not grumpy.
If someone is not timid and expensive, then he is both not entire and not quaint, and vice versa.
Matthew being not expensive is equivalent to Joe being not timid.
If someone is not quaint, then he is both entire and not grumpy.
If Matthew is expensive or Randolph is entire, then Shamus is timid. | Lucille is not naughty. | self_contradiction |
Shamus is quaint.
Shamus is not entire.
Halden is expensive.
Lucille is not quaint.
Joshua is grumpy.
Halden is naughty.
Matthew is naughty.
Lucille is grumpy.
Lucille is naughty.
Shamus is not grumpy.
Joshua is timid.
Joe is not timid.If Halden is entire, then Randolph is expensive and Lucille is not timid, and vice versa.
Someone who is not naughty is always both not timid and not grumpy.
If someone is naughty, then he is entire, and vice versa.
If Joshua is not expensive and Joe is quaint, then Lucille is naughty and Randolph is grumpy.
Someone who is eithor not quaint or not expensive is always grumpy.
If there is someone who is either not naughty or not timid, then Halden is not quaint and Joshua is expensive.
Someone is naughty if and only if he is expensive.
As long as someone is not timid, he is not naughty and not grumpy.
If someone is not timid and expensive, then he is both not entire and not quaint, and vice versa.
Matthew being not expensive is equivalent to Joe being not timid.
If someone is not quaint, then he is both entire and not grumpy.
If Matthew is expensive or Randolph is entire, then Shamus is timid. | Shamus is quaint. | entailment |
Shamus is quaint.
Shamus is not entire.
Halden is expensive.
Lucille is not quaint.
Joshua is grumpy.
Halden is naughty.
Matthew is naughty.
Lucille is grumpy.
Lucille is naughty.
Shamus is not grumpy.
Joshua is timid.
Joe is not timid.If Halden is entire, then Randolph is expensive and Lucille is not timid, and vice versa.
Someone who is not naughty is always both not timid and not grumpy.
If someone is naughty, then he is entire, and vice versa.
If Joshua is not expensive and Joe is quaint, then Lucille is naughty and Randolph is grumpy.
Someone who is eithor not quaint or not expensive is always grumpy.
If there is someone who is either not naughty or not timid, then Halden is not quaint and Joshua is expensive.
Someone is naughty if and only if he is expensive.
As long as someone is not timid, he is not naughty and not grumpy.
If someone is not timid and expensive, then he is both not entire and not quaint, and vice versa.
Matthew being not expensive is equivalent to Joe being not timid.
If someone is not quaint, then he is both entire and not grumpy.
If Matthew is expensive or Randolph is entire, then Shamus is timid. | Randolph is not quaint. | neutral |
Shamus is quaint.
Shamus is not entire.
Halden is expensive.
Lucille is not quaint.
Joshua is grumpy.
Halden is naughty.
Matthew is naughty.
Lucille is grumpy.
Lucille is naughty.
Shamus is not grumpy.
Joshua is timid.
Joe is not timid.If Halden is entire, then Randolph is expensive and Lucille is not timid, and vice versa.
Someone who is not naughty is always both not timid and not grumpy.
If someone is naughty, then he is entire, and vice versa.
If Joshua is not expensive and Joe is quaint, then Lucille is naughty and Randolph is grumpy.
Someone who is eithor not quaint or not expensive is always grumpy.
If there is someone who is either not naughty or not timid, then Halden is not quaint and Joshua is expensive.
Someone is naughty if and only if he is expensive.
As long as someone is not timid, he is not naughty and not grumpy.
If someone is not timid and expensive, then he is both not entire and not quaint, and vice versa.
Matthew being not expensive is equivalent to Joe being not timid.
If someone is not quaint, then he is both entire and not grumpy.
If Matthew is expensive or Randolph is entire, then Shamus is timid. | Halden is not expensive. | contradiction |
Shamus is quaint.
Shamus is not entire.
Halden is expensive.
Lucille is not quaint.
Joshua is grumpy.
Halden is naughty.
Matthew is naughty.
Lucille is grumpy.
Lucille is naughty.
Shamus is not grumpy.
Joshua is timid.
Joe is not timid.If Halden is entire, then Randolph is expensive and Lucille is not timid, and vice versa.
Someone who is not naughty is always both not timid and not grumpy.
If someone is naughty, then he is entire, and vice versa.
If Joshua is not expensive and Joe is quaint, then Lucille is naughty and Randolph is grumpy.
Someone who is eithor not quaint or not expensive is always grumpy.
If there is someone who is either not naughty or not timid, then Halden is not quaint and Joshua is expensive.
Someone is naughty if and only if he is expensive.
As long as someone is not timid, he is not naughty and not grumpy.
If someone is not timid and expensive, then he is both not entire and not quaint, and vice versa.
Matthew being not expensive is equivalent to Joe being not timid.
If someone is not quaint, then he is both entire and not grumpy.
If Matthew is expensive or Randolph is entire, then Shamus is timid. | Lucille is grumpy. | self_contradiction |
Shamus is quaint.
Shamus is not entire.
Halden is expensive.
Lucille is not quaint.
Joshua is grumpy.
Halden is naughty.
Matthew is naughty.
Lucille is grumpy.
Lucille is naughty.
Shamus is not grumpy.
Joshua is timid.
Joe is not timid.If Halden is entire, then Randolph is expensive and Lucille is not timid, and vice versa.
Someone who is not naughty is always both not timid and not grumpy.
If someone is naughty, then he is entire, and vice versa.
If Joshua is not expensive and Joe is quaint, then Lucille is naughty and Randolph is grumpy.
Someone who is eithor not quaint or not expensive is always grumpy.
If there is someone who is either not naughty or not timid, then Halden is not quaint and Joshua is expensive.
Someone is naughty if and only if he is expensive.
As long as someone is not timid, he is not naughty and not grumpy.
If someone is not timid and expensive, then he is both not entire and not quaint, and vice versa.
Matthew being not expensive is equivalent to Joe being not timid.
If someone is not quaint, then he is both entire and not grumpy.
If Matthew is expensive or Randolph is entire, then Shamus is timid. | Matthew is expensive. | self_contradiction |
Shamus is quaint.
Shamus is not entire.
Halden is expensive.
Lucille is not quaint.
Joshua is grumpy.
Halden is naughty.
Matthew is naughty.
Lucille is grumpy.
Lucille is naughty.
Shamus is not grumpy.
Joshua is timid.
Joe is not timid.If Halden is entire, then Randolph is expensive and Lucille is not timid, and vice versa.
Someone who is not naughty is always both not timid and not grumpy.
If someone is naughty, then he is entire, and vice versa.
If Joshua is not expensive and Joe is quaint, then Lucille is naughty and Randolph is grumpy.
Someone who is eithor not quaint or not expensive is always grumpy.
If there is someone who is either not naughty or not timid, then Halden is not quaint and Joshua is expensive.
Someone is naughty if and only if he is expensive.
As long as someone is not timid, he is not naughty and not grumpy.
If someone is not timid and expensive, then he is both not entire and not quaint, and vice versa.
Matthew being not expensive is equivalent to Joe being not timid.
If someone is not quaint, then he is both entire and not grumpy.
If Matthew is expensive or Randolph is entire, then Shamus is timid. | Halden is not naughty. | contradiction |
Shamus is quaint.
Shamus is not entire.
Halden is expensive.
Lucille is not quaint.
Joshua is grumpy.
Halden is naughty.
Matthew is naughty.
Lucille is grumpy.
Lucille is naughty.
Shamus is not grumpy.
Joshua is timid.
Joe is not timid.If Halden is entire, then Randolph is expensive and Lucille is not timid, and vice versa.
Someone who is not naughty is always both not timid and not grumpy.
If someone is naughty, then he is entire, and vice versa.
If Joshua is not expensive and Joe is quaint, then Lucille is naughty and Randolph is grumpy.
Someone who is eithor not quaint or not expensive is always grumpy.
If there is someone who is either not naughty or not timid, then Halden is not quaint and Joshua is expensive.
Someone is naughty if and only if he is expensive.
As long as someone is not timid, he is not naughty and not grumpy.
If someone is not timid and expensive, then he is both not entire and not quaint, and vice versa.
Matthew being not expensive is equivalent to Joe being not timid.
If someone is not quaint, then he is both entire and not grumpy.
If Matthew is expensive or Randolph is entire, then Shamus is timid. | Shamus is not quaint. | contradiction |
Shamus is quaint.
Shamus is not entire.
Halden is expensive.
Lucille is not quaint.
Joshua is grumpy.
Halden is naughty.
Matthew is naughty.
Lucille is grumpy.
Lucille is naughty.
Shamus is not grumpy.
Joshua is timid.
Joe is not timid.If Halden is entire, then Randolph is expensive and Lucille is not timid, and vice versa.
Someone who is not naughty is always both not timid and not grumpy.
If someone is naughty, then he is entire, and vice versa.
If Joshua is not expensive and Joe is quaint, then Lucille is naughty and Randolph is grumpy.
Someone who is eithor not quaint or not expensive is always grumpy.
If there is someone who is either not naughty or not timid, then Halden is not quaint and Joshua is expensive.
Someone is naughty if and only if he is expensive.
As long as someone is not timid, he is not naughty and not grumpy.
If someone is not timid and expensive, then he is both not entire and not quaint, and vice versa.
Matthew being not expensive is equivalent to Joe being not timid.
If someone is not quaint, then he is both entire and not grumpy.
If Matthew is expensive or Randolph is entire, then Shamus is timid. | Lucille is not entire. | self_contradiction |
Shamus is quaint.
Shamus is not entire.
Halden is expensive.
Lucille is not quaint.
Joshua is grumpy.
Halden is naughty.
Matthew is naughty.
Lucille is grumpy.
Lucille is naughty.
Shamus is not grumpy.
Joshua is timid.
Joe is not timid.If Halden is entire, then Randolph is expensive and Lucille is not timid, and vice versa.
Someone who is not naughty is always both not timid and not grumpy.
If someone is naughty, then he is entire, and vice versa.
If Joshua is not expensive and Joe is quaint, then Lucille is naughty and Randolph is grumpy.
Someone who is eithor not quaint or not expensive is always grumpy.
If there is someone who is either not naughty or not timid, then Halden is not quaint and Joshua is expensive.
Someone is naughty if and only if he is expensive.
As long as someone is not timid, he is not naughty and not grumpy.
If someone is not timid and expensive, then he is both not entire and not quaint, and vice versa.
Matthew being not expensive is equivalent to Joe being not timid.
If someone is not quaint, then he is both entire and not grumpy.
If Matthew is expensive or Randolph is entire, then Shamus is timid. | Matthew is grumpy. | entailment |
Benton is not nutty.
Bruce is not elderly.
Bruce is practical.
Bruce is not famous.
Benton is yellow.
Alberto is not nutty.
Alberto is not yellow.
Bruce is not cooperative.
Benton is practical.
Eunice is yellow.
Percival is not yellow.
Brooke is practical.If all people are elderly, then Benton is not cooperative and Brooke is not nutty.
Eunice is practical if and only if Brooke is cooperative and Percival is not famous.
If Eunice is cooperative, then Percival is famous, and vice versa.
If all people are famous or yellow, then Alberto is nutty.
Someone who is not elderly is always both not cooperative and not famous.
If Eunice is not famous, then Mark is not practical and Benton is not nutty, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both famous and nutty, then Eunice is not cooperative.
Someone who is yellow is always not practical.
If someone is nutty and not cooperative, then he is practical, and vice versa.
If someone is yellow and nutty, then he is both practical and famous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Brooke is practical once knowing that Mark is famous or Alberto is nutty.
All nutty people are famous. | Eunice is not yellow. | contradiction |
Benton is not nutty.
Bruce is not elderly.
Bruce is practical.
Bruce is not famous.
Benton is yellow.
Alberto is not nutty.
Alberto is not yellow.
Bruce is not cooperative.
Benton is practical.
Eunice is yellow.
Percival is not yellow.
Brooke is practical.If all people are elderly, then Benton is not cooperative and Brooke is not nutty.
Eunice is practical if and only if Brooke is cooperative and Percival is not famous.
If Eunice is cooperative, then Percival is famous, and vice versa.
If all people are famous or yellow, then Alberto is nutty.
Someone who is not elderly is always both not cooperative and not famous.
If Eunice is not famous, then Mark is not practical and Benton is not nutty, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both famous and nutty, then Eunice is not cooperative.
Someone who is yellow is always not practical.
If someone is nutty and not cooperative, then he is practical, and vice versa.
If someone is yellow and nutty, then he is both practical and famous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Brooke is practical once knowing that Mark is famous or Alberto is nutty.
All nutty people are famous. | Benton is not practical. | self_contradiction |
Benton is not nutty.
Bruce is not elderly.
Bruce is practical.
Bruce is not famous.
Benton is yellow.
Alberto is not nutty.
Alberto is not yellow.
Bruce is not cooperative.
Benton is practical.
Eunice is yellow.
Percival is not yellow.
Brooke is practical.If all people are elderly, then Benton is not cooperative and Brooke is not nutty.
Eunice is practical if and only if Brooke is cooperative and Percival is not famous.
If Eunice is cooperative, then Percival is famous, and vice versa.
If all people are famous or yellow, then Alberto is nutty.
Someone who is not elderly is always both not cooperative and not famous.
If Eunice is not famous, then Mark is not practical and Benton is not nutty, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both famous and nutty, then Eunice is not cooperative.
Someone who is yellow is always not practical.
If someone is nutty and not cooperative, then he is practical, and vice versa.
If someone is yellow and nutty, then he is both practical and famous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Brooke is practical once knowing that Mark is famous or Alberto is nutty.
All nutty people are famous. | Brooke is famous. | entailment |
Benton is not nutty.
Bruce is not elderly.
Bruce is practical.
Bruce is not famous.
Benton is yellow.
Alberto is not nutty.
Alberto is not yellow.
Bruce is not cooperative.
Benton is practical.
Eunice is yellow.
Percival is not yellow.
Brooke is practical.If all people are elderly, then Benton is not cooperative and Brooke is not nutty.
Eunice is practical if and only if Brooke is cooperative and Percival is not famous.
If Eunice is cooperative, then Percival is famous, and vice versa.
If all people are famous or yellow, then Alberto is nutty.
Someone who is not elderly is always both not cooperative and not famous.
If Eunice is not famous, then Mark is not practical and Benton is not nutty, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both famous and nutty, then Eunice is not cooperative.
Someone who is yellow is always not practical.
If someone is nutty and not cooperative, then he is practical, and vice versa.
If someone is yellow and nutty, then he is both practical and famous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Brooke is practical once knowing that Mark is famous or Alberto is nutty.
All nutty people are famous. | Bruce is not practical. | self_contradiction |
Benton is not nutty.
Bruce is not elderly.
Bruce is practical.
Bruce is not famous.
Benton is yellow.
Alberto is not nutty.
Alberto is not yellow.
Bruce is not cooperative.
Benton is practical.
Eunice is yellow.
Percival is not yellow.
Brooke is practical.If all people are elderly, then Benton is not cooperative and Brooke is not nutty.
Eunice is practical if and only if Brooke is cooperative and Percival is not famous.
If Eunice is cooperative, then Percival is famous, and vice versa.
If all people are famous or yellow, then Alberto is nutty.
Someone who is not elderly is always both not cooperative and not famous.
If Eunice is not famous, then Mark is not practical and Benton is not nutty, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both famous and nutty, then Eunice is not cooperative.
Someone who is yellow is always not practical.
If someone is nutty and not cooperative, then he is practical, and vice versa.
If someone is yellow and nutty, then he is both practical and famous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Brooke is practical once knowing that Mark is famous or Alberto is nutty.
All nutty people are famous. | Benton is nutty. | self_contradiction |
Benton is not nutty.
Bruce is not elderly.
Bruce is practical.
Bruce is not famous.
Benton is yellow.
Alberto is not nutty.
Alberto is not yellow.
Bruce is not cooperative.
Benton is practical.
Eunice is yellow.
Percival is not yellow.
Brooke is practical.If all people are elderly, then Benton is not cooperative and Brooke is not nutty.
Eunice is practical if and only if Brooke is cooperative and Percival is not famous.
If Eunice is cooperative, then Percival is famous, and vice versa.
If all people are famous or yellow, then Alberto is nutty.
Someone who is not elderly is always both not cooperative and not famous.
If Eunice is not famous, then Mark is not practical and Benton is not nutty, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both famous and nutty, then Eunice is not cooperative.
Someone who is yellow is always not practical.
If someone is nutty and not cooperative, then he is practical, and vice versa.
If someone is yellow and nutty, then he is both practical and famous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Brooke is practical once knowing that Mark is famous or Alberto is nutty.
All nutty people are famous. | Brooke is not practical. | self_contradiction |
Benton is not nutty.
Bruce is not elderly.
Bruce is practical.
Bruce is not famous.
Benton is yellow.
Alberto is not nutty.
Alberto is not yellow.
Bruce is not cooperative.
Benton is practical.
Eunice is yellow.
Percival is not yellow.
Brooke is practical.If all people are elderly, then Benton is not cooperative and Brooke is not nutty.
Eunice is practical if and only if Brooke is cooperative and Percival is not famous.
If Eunice is cooperative, then Percival is famous, and vice versa.
If all people are famous or yellow, then Alberto is nutty.
Someone who is not elderly is always both not cooperative and not famous.
If Eunice is not famous, then Mark is not practical and Benton is not nutty, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both famous and nutty, then Eunice is not cooperative.
Someone who is yellow is always not practical.
If someone is nutty and not cooperative, then he is practical, and vice versa.
If someone is yellow and nutty, then he is both practical and famous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Brooke is practical once knowing that Mark is famous or Alberto is nutty.
All nutty people are famous. | Eunice is yellow. | entailment |
Benton is not nutty.
Bruce is not elderly.
Bruce is practical.
Bruce is not famous.
Benton is yellow.
Alberto is not nutty.
Alberto is not yellow.
Bruce is not cooperative.
Benton is practical.
Eunice is yellow.
Percival is not yellow.
Brooke is practical.If all people are elderly, then Benton is not cooperative and Brooke is not nutty.
Eunice is practical if and only if Brooke is cooperative and Percival is not famous.
If Eunice is cooperative, then Percival is famous, and vice versa.
If all people are famous or yellow, then Alberto is nutty.
Someone who is not elderly is always both not cooperative and not famous.
If Eunice is not famous, then Mark is not practical and Benton is not nutty, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both famous and nutty, then Eunice is not cooperative.
Someone who is yellow is always not practical.
If someone is nutty and not cooperative, then he is practical, and vice versa.
If someone is yellow and nutty, then he is both practical and famous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Brooke is practical once knowing that Mark is famous or Alberto is nutty.
All nutty people are famous. | Alberto is cooperative. | neutral |
Benton is not nutty.
Bruce is not elderly.
Bruce is practical.
Bruce is not famous.
Benton is yellow.
Alberto is not nutty.
Alberto is not yellow.
Bruce is not cooperative.
Benton is practical.
Eunice is yellow.
Percival is not yellow.
Brooke is practical.If all people are elderly, then Benton is not cooperative and Brooke is not nutty.
Eunice is practical if and only if Brooke is cooperative and Percival is not famous.
If Eunice is cooperative, then Percival is famous, and vice versa.
If all people are famous or yellow, then Alberto is nutty.
Someone who is not elderly is always both not cooperative and not famous.
If Eunice is not famous, then Mark is not practical and Benton is not nutty, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both famous and nutty, then Eunice is not cooperative.
Someone who is yellow is always not practical.
If someone is nutty and not cooperative, then he is practical, and vice versa.
If someone is yellow and nutty, then he is both practical and famous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Brooke is practical once knowing that Mark is famous or Alberto is nutty.
All nutty people are famous. | Mark is famous. | neutral |
Benton is not nutty.
Bruce is not elderly.
Bruce is practical.
Bruce is not famous.
Benton is yellow.
Alberto is not nutty.
Alberto is not yellow.
Bruce is not cooperative.
Benton is practical.
Eunice is yellow.
Percival is not yellow.
Brooke is practical.If all people are elderly, then Benton is not cooperative and Brooke is not nutty.
Eunice is practical if and only if Brooke is cooperative and Percival is not famous.
If Eunice is cooperative, then Percival is famous, and vice versa.
If all people are famous or yellow, then Alberto is nutty.
Someone who is not elderly is always both not cooperative and not famous.
If Eunice is not famous, then Mark is not practical and Benton is not nutty, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both famous and nutty, then Eunice is not cooperative.
Someone who is yellow is always not practical.
If someone is nutty and not cooperative, then he is practical, and vice versa.
If someone is yellow and nutty, then he is both practical and famous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Brooke is practical once knowing that Mark is famous or Alberto is nutty.
All nutty people are famous. | Brooke is not nutty. | contradiction |
Benton is not nutty.
Bruce is not elderly.
Bruce is practical.
Bruce is not famous.
Benton is yellow.
Alberto is not nutty.
Alberto is not yellow.
Bruce is not cooperative.
Benton is practical.
Eunice is yellow.
Percival is not yellow.
Brooke is practical.If all people are elderly, then Benton is not cooperative and Brooke is not nutty.
Eunice is practical if and only if Brooke is cooperative and Percival is not famous.
If Eunice is cooperative, then Percival is famous, and vice versa.
If all people are famous or yellow, then Alberto is nutty.
Someone who is not elderly is always both not cooperative and not famous.
If Eunice is not famous, then Mark is not practical and Benton is not nutty, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both famous and nutty, then Eunice is not cooperative.
Someone who is yellow is always not practical.
If someone is nutty and not cooperative, then he is practical, and vice versa.
If someone is yellow and nutty, then he is both practical and famous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Brooke is practical once knowing that Mark is famous or Alberto is nutty.
All nutty people are famous. | Bruce is nutty. | entailment |
Benton is not nutty.
Bruce is not elderly.
Bruce is practical.
Bruce is not famous.
Benton is yellow.
Alberto is not nutty.
Alberto is not yellow.
Bruce is not cooperative.
Benton is practical.
Eunice is yellow.
Percival is not yellow.
Brooke is practical.If all people are elderly, then Benton is not cooperative and Brooke is not nutty.
Eunice is practical if and only if Brooke is cooperative and Percival is not famous.
If Eunice is cooperative, then Percival is famous, and vice versa.
If all people are famous or yellow, then Alberto is nutty.
Someone who is not elderly is always both not cooperative and not famous.
If Eunice is not famous, then Mark is not practical and Benton is not nutty, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both famous and nutty, then Eunice is not cooperative.
Someone who is yellow is always not practical.
If someone is nutty and not cooperative, then he is practical, and vice versa.
If someone is yellow and nutty, then he is both practical and famous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Brooke is practical once knowing that Mark is famous or Alberto is nutty.
All nutty people are famous. | Percival is yellow. | contradiction |
Benton is not nutty.
Bruce is not elderly.
Bruce is practical.
Bruce is not famous.
Benton is yellow.
Alberto is not nutty.
Alberto is not yellow.
Bruce is not cooperative.
Benton is practical.
Eunice is yellow.
Percival is not yellow.
Brooke is practical.If all people are elderly, then Benton is not cooperative and Brooke is not nutty.
Eunice is practical if and only if Brooke is cooperative and Percival is not famous.
If Eunice is cooperative, then Percival is famous, and vice versa.
If all people are famous or yellow, then Alberto is nutty.
Someone who is not elderly is always both not cooperative and not famous.
If Eunice is not famous, then Mark is not practical and Benton is not nutty, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both famous and nutty, then Eunice is not cooperative.
Someone who is yellow is always not practical.
If someone is nutty and not cooperative, then he is practical, and vice versa.
If someone is yellow and nutty, then he is both practical and famous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Brooke is practical once knowing that Mark is famous or Alberto is nutty.
All nutty people are famous. | Percival is practical. | neutral |
Benton is not nutty.
Bruce is not elderly.
Bruce is practical.
Bruce is not famous.
Benton is yellow.
Alberto is not nutty.
Alberto is not yellow.
Bruce is not cooperative.
Benton is practical.
Eunice is yellow.
Percival is not yellow.
Brooke is practical.If all people are elderly, then Benton is not cooperative and Brooke is not nutty.
Eunice is practical if and only if Brooke is cooperative and Percival is not famous.
If Eunice is cooperative, then Percival is famous, and vice versa.
If all people are famous or yellow, then Alberto is nutty.
Someone who is not elderly is always both not cooperative and not famous.
If Eunice is not famous, then Mark is not practical and Benton is not nutty, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both famous and nutty, then Eunice is not cooperative.
Someone who is yellow is always not practical.
If someone is nutty and not cooperative, then he is practical, and vice versa.
If someone is yellow and nutty, then he is both practical and famous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Brooke is practical once knowing that Mark is famous or Alberto is nutty.
All nutty people are famous. | Brooke is not yellow. | contradiction |
Benton is not nutty.
Bruce is not elderly.
Bruce is practical.
Bruce is not famous.
Benton is yellow.
Alberto is not nutty.
Alberto is not yellow.
Bruce is not cooperative.
Benton is practical.
Eunice is yellow.
Percival is not yellow.
Brooke is practical.If all people are elderly, then Benton is not cooperative and Brooke is not nutty.
Eunice is practical if and only if Brooke is cooperative and Percival is not famous.
If Eunice is cooperative, then Percival is famous, and vice versa.
If all people are famous or yellow, then Alberto is nutty.
Someone who is not elderly is always both not cooperative and not famous.
If Eunice is not famous, then Mark is not practical and Benton is not nutty, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both famous and nutty, then Eunice is not cooperative.
Someone who is yellow is always not practical.
If someone is nutty and not cooperative, then he is practical, and vice versa.
If someone is yellow and nutty, then he is both practical and famous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Brooke is practical once knowing that Mark is famous or Alberto is nutty.
All nutty people are famous. | Bruce is not famous. | self_contradiction |
Benton is not nutty.
Bruce is not elderly.
Bruce is practical.
Bruce is not famous.
Benton is yellow.
Alberto is not nutty.
Alberto is not yellow.
Bruce is not cooperative.
Benton is practical.
Eunice is yellow.
Percival is not yellow.
Brooke is practical.If all people are elderly, then Benton is not cooperative and Brooke is not nutty.
Eunice is practical if and only if Brooke is cooperative and Percival is not famous.
If Eunice is cooperative, then Percival is famous, and vice versa.
If all people are famous or yellow, then Alberto is nutty.
Someone who is not elderly is always both not cooperative and not famous.
If Eunice is not famous, then Mark is not practical and Benton is not nutty, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both famous and nutty, then Eunice is not cooperative.
Someone who is yellow is always not practical.
If someone is nutty and not cooperative, then he is practical, and vice versa.
If someone is yellow and nutty, then he is both practical and famous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Brooke is practical once knowing that Mark is famous or Alberto is nutty.
All nutty people are famous. | Alberto is nutty. | contradiction |
Benton is not nutty.
Bruce is not elderly.
Bruce is practical.
Bruce is not famous.
Benton is yellow.
Alberto is not nutty.
Alberto is not yellow.
Bruce is not cooperative.
Benton is practical.
Eunice is yellow.
Percival is not yellow.
Brooke is practical.If all people are elderly, then Benton is not cooperative and Brooke is not nutty.
Eunice is practical if and only if Brooke is cooperative and Percival is not famous.
If Eunice is cooperative, then Percival is famous, and vice versa.
If all people are famous or yellow, then Alberto is nutty.
Someone who is not elderly is always both not cooperative and not famous.
If Eunice is not famous, then Mark is not practical and Benton is not nutty, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both famous and nutty, then Eunice is not cooperative.
Someone who is yellow is always not practical.
If someone is nutty and not cooperative, then he is practical, and vice versa.
If someone is yellow and nutty, then he is both practical and famous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Brooke is practical once knowing that Mark is famous or Alberto is nutty.
All nutty people are famous. | Brooke is nutty. | entailment |
Benton is not nutty.
Bruce is not elderly.
Bruce is practical.
Bruce is not famous.
Benton is yellow.
Alberto is not nutty.
Alberto is not yellow.
Bruce is not cooperative.
Benton is practical.
Eunice is yellow.
Percival is not yellow.
Brooke is practical.If all people are elderly, then Benton is not cooperative and Brooke is not nutty.
Eunice is practical if and only if Brooke is cooperative and Percival is not famous.
If Eunice is cooperative, then Percival is famous, and vice versa.
If all people are famous or yellow, then Alberto is nutty.
Someone who is not elderly is always both not cooperative and not famous.
If Eunice is not famous, then Mark is not practical and Benton is not nutty, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both famous and nutty, then Eunice is not cooperative.
Someone who is yellow is always not practical.
If someone is nutty and not cooperative, then he is practical, and vice versa.
If someone is yellow and nutty, then he is both practical and famous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Brooke is practical once knowing that Mark is famous or Alberto is nutty.
All nutty people are famous. | Percival is famous. | neutral |
Benton is not nutty.
Bruce is not elderly.
Bruce is practical.
Bruce is not famous.
Benton is yellow.
Alberto is not nutty.
Alberto is not yellow.
Bruce is not cooperative.
Benton is practical.
Eunice is yellow.
Percival is not yellow.
Brooke is practical.If all people are elderly, then Benton is not cooperative and Brooke is not nutty.
Eunice is practical if and only if Brooke is cooperative and Percival is not famous.
If Eunice is cooperative, then Percival is famous, and vice versa.
If all people are famous or yellow, then Alberto is nutty.
Someone who is not elderly is always both not cooperative and not famous.
If Eunice is not famous, then Mark is not practical and Benton is not nutty, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both famous and nutty, then Eunice is not cooperative.
Someone who is yellow is always not practical.
If someone is nutty and not cooperative, then he is practical, and vice versa.
If someone is yellow and nutty, then he is both practical and famous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Brooke is practical once knowing that Mark is famous or Alberto is nutty.
All nutty people are famous. | Bruce is not elderly. | entailment |
Benton is not nutty.
Bruce is not elderly.
Bruce is practical.
Bruce is not famous.
Benton is yellow.
Alberto is not nutty.
Alberto is not yellow.
Bruce is not cooperative.
Benton is practical.
Eunice is yellow.
Percival is not yellow.
Brooke is practical.If all people are elderly, then Benton is not cooperative and Brooke is not nutty.
Eunice is practical if and only if Brooke is cooperative and Percival is not famous.
If Eunice is cooperative, then Percival is famous, and vice versa.
If all people are famous or yellow, then Alberto is nutty.
Someone who is not elderly is always both not cooperative and not famous.
If Eunice is not famous, then Mark is not practical and Benton is not nutty, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both famous and nutty, then Eunice is not cooperative.
Someone who is yellow is always not practical.
If someone is nutty and not cooperative, then he is practical, and vice versa.
If someone is yellow and nutty, then he is both practical and famous, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Brooke is practical once knowing that Mark is famous or Alberto is nutty.
All nutty people are famous. | Mark is nutty. | neutral |
Hector is not elegant.
Lane is not inquisitive.
Lane is lucky.
Matthew is inquisitive.
Matthew is not lucky.
Bowen is elegant.
Bruno is not lucky.
Lane is elegant.
Lane is not plain.
Lane is not determined.
Bruno is inquisitive.
Alisa is inquisitive.Someone who is plain is always both not inquisitive and elegant.
If there is at least one people who is both not plain and not elegant, then Matthew is not inquisitive.
If there is nobody who is not not elegant, then Matthew is not inquisitive.
It can be concluded that Alisa is inquisitive and Bruno is not plain once knowing that Alisa is elderly and Matthew is not lucky.
If there is at least one people who is not elegant or not lucky, then Matthew is elderly.
Someone who is plain or not elegant is always not determined and inquisitive.
If someone is not inquisitive or he is determined, then he is not lucky.
If someone is not elegant, then he is plain, and vice versa.
Someone is determined and not plain if and only if he is inquisitive and elegant.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Kianna is plain and Kianna is inquisitive.
Matthew being not inquisitive or Lane being lucky implies that Bowen is elegant.
It can be concluded that Matthew is elderly once knowing that Kianna is plain and Bruno is not determined. | Lane is not determined. | entailment |
Hector is not elegant.
Lane is not inquisitive.
Lane is lucky.
Matthew is inquisitive.
Matthew is not lucky.
Bowen is elegant.
Bruno is not lucky.
Lane is elegant.
Lane is not plain.
Lane is not determined.
Bruno is inquisitive.
Alisa is inquisitive.Someone who is plain is always both not inquisitive and elegant.
If there is at least one people who is both not plain and not elegant, then Matthew is not inquisitive.
If there is nobody who is not not elegant, then Matthew is not inquisitive.
It can be concluded that Alisa is inquisitive and Bruno is not plain once knowing that Alisa is elderly and Matthew is not lucky.
If there is at least one people who is not elegant or not lucky, then Matthew is elderly.
Someone who is plain or not elegant is always not determined and inquisitive.
If someone is not inquisitive or he is determined, then he is not lucky.
If someone is not elegant, then he is plain, and vice versa.
Someone is determined and not plain if and only if he is inquisitive and elegant.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Kianna is plain and Kianna is inquisitive.
Matthew being not inquisitive or Lane being lucky implies that Bowen is elegant.
It can be concluded that Matthew is elderly once knowing that Kianna is plain and Bruno is not determined. | Alisa is determined. | neutral |
Hector is not elegant.
Lane is not inquisitive.
Lane is lucky.
Matthew is inquisitive.
Matthew is not lucky.
Bowen is elegant.
Bruno is not lucky.
Lane is elegant.
Lane is not plain.
Lane is not determined.
Bruno is inquisitive.
Alisa is inquisitive.Someone who is plain is always both not inquisitive and elegant.
If there is at least one people who is both not plain and not elegant, then Matthew is not inquisitive.
If there is nobody who is not not elegant, then Matthew is not inquisitive.
It can be concluded that Alisa is inquisitive and Bruno is not plain once knowing that Alisa is elderly and Matthew is not lucky.
If there is at least one people who is not elegant or not lucky, then Matthew is elderly.
Someone who is plain or not elegant is always not determined and inquisitive.
If someone is not inquisitive or he is determined, then he is not lucky.
If someone is not elegant, then he is plain, and vice versa.
Someone is determined and not plain if and only if he is inquisitive and elegant.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Kianna is plain and Kianna is inquisitive.
Matthew being not inquisitive or Lane being lucky implies that Bowen is elegant.
It can be concluded that Matthew is elderly once knowing that Kianna is plain and Bruno is not determined. | Lane is inquisitive. | contradiction |
Hector is not elegant.
Lane is not inquisitive.
Lane is lucky.
Matthew is inquisitive.
Matthew is not lucky.
Bowen is elegant.
Bruno is not lucky.
Lane is elegant.
Lane is not plain.
Lane is not determined.
Bruno is inquisitive.
Alisa is inquisitive.Someone who is plain is always both not inquisitive and elegant.
If there is at least one people who is both not plain and not elegant, then Matthew is not inquisitive.
If there is nobody who is not not elegant, then Matthew is not inquisitive.
It can be concluded that Alisa is inquisitive and Bruno is not plain once knowing that Alisa is elderly and Matthew is not lucky.
If there is at least one people who is not elegant or not lucky, then Matthew is elderly.
Someone who is plain or not elegant is always not determined and inquisitive.
If someone is not inquisitive or he is determined, then he is not lucky.
If someone is not elegant, then he is plain, and vice versa.
Someone is determined and not plain if and only if he is inquisitive and elegant.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Kianna is plain and Kianna is inquisitive.
Matthew being not inquisitive or Lane being lucky implies that Bowen is elegant.
It can be concluded that Matthew is elderly once knowing that Kianna is plain and Bruno is not determined. | Kianna is plain. | self_contradiction |
Hector is not elegant.
Lane is not inquisitive.
Lane is lucky.
Matthew is inquisitive.
Matthew is not lucky.
Bowen is elegant.
Bruno is not lucky.
Lane is elegant.
Lane is not plain.
Lane is not determined.
Bruno is inquisitive.
Alisa is inquisitive.Someone who is plain is always both not inquisitive and elegant.
If there is at least one people who is both not plain and not elegant, then Matthew is not inquisitive.
If there is nobody who is not not elegant, then Matthew is not inquisitive.
It can be concluded that Alisa is inquisitive and Bruno is not plain once knowing that Alisa is elderly and Matthew is not lucky.
If there is at least one people who is not elegant or not lucky, then Matthew is elderly.
Someone who is plain or not elegant is always not determined and inquisitive.
If someone is not inquisitive or he is determined, then he is not lucky.
If someone is not elegant, then he is plain, and vice versa.
Someone is determined and not plain if and only if he is inquisitive and elegant.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Kianna is plain and Kianna is inquisitive.
Matthew being not inquisitive or Lane being lucky implies that Bowen is elegant.
It can be concluded that Matthew is elderly once knowing that Kianna is plain and Bruno is not determined. | Kianna is lucky. | contradiction |
Hector is not elegant.
Lane is not inquisitive.
Lane is lucky.
Matthew is inquisitive.
Matthew is not lucky.
Bowen is elegant.
Bruno is not lucky.
Lane is elegant.
Lane is not plain.
Lane is not determined.
Bruno is inquisitive.
Alisa is inquisitive.Someone who is plain is always both not inquisitive and elegant.
If there is at least one people who is both not plain and not elegant, then Matthew is not inquisitive.
If there is nobody who is not not elegant, then Matthew is not inquisitive.
It can be concluded that Alisa is inquisitive and Bruno is not plain once knowing that Alisa is elderly and Matthew is not lucky.
If there is at least one people who is not elegant or not lucky, then Matthew is elderly.
Someone who is plain or not elegant is always not determined and inquisitive.
If someone is not inquisitive or he is determined, then he is not lucky.
If someone is not elegant, then he is plain, and vice versa.
Someone is determined and not plain if and only if he is inquisitive and elegant.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Kianna is plain and Kianna is inquisitive.
Matthew being not inquisitive or Lane being lucky implies that Bowen is elegant.
It can be concluded that Matthew is elderly once knowing that Kianna is plain and Bruno is not determined. | Kianna is elegant. | self_contradiction |
Hector is not elegant.
Lane is not inquisitive.
Lane is lucky.
Matthew is inquisitive.
Matthew is not lucky.
Bowen is elegant.
Bruno is not lucky.
Lane is elegant.
Lane is not plain.
Lane is not determined.
Bruno is inquisitive.
Alisa is inquisitive.Someone who is plain is always both not inquisitive and elegant.
If there is at least one people who is both not plain and not elegant, then Matthew is not inquisitive.
If there is nobody who is not not elegant, then Matthew is not inquisitive.
It can be concluded that Alisa is inquisitive and Bruno is not plain once knowing that Alisa is elderly and Matthew is not lucky.
If there is at least one people who is not elegant or not lucky, then Matthew is elderly.
Someone who is plain or not elegant is always not determined and inquisitive.
If someone is not inquisitive or he is determined, then he is not lucky.
If someone is not elegant, then he is plain, and vice versa.
Someone is determined and not plain if and only if he is inquisitive and elegant.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Kianna is plain and Kianna is inquisitive.
Matthew being not inquisitive or Lane being lucky implies that Bowen is elegant.
It can be concluded that Matthew is elderly once knowing that Kianna is plain and Bruno is not determined. | Kianna is not elderly. | neutral |
Hector is not elegant.
Lane is not inquisitive.
Lane is lucky.
Matthew is inquisitive.
Matthew is not lucky.
Bowen is elegant.
Bruno is not lucky.
Lane is elegant.
Lane is not plain.
Lane is not determined.
Bruno is inquisitive.
Alisa is inquisitive.Someone who is plain is always both not inquisitive and elegant.
If there is at least one people who is both not plain and not elegant, then Matthew is not inquisitive.
If there is nobody who is not not elegant, then Matthew is not inquisitive.
It can be concluded that Alisa is inquisitive and Bruno is not plain once knowing that Alisa is elderly and Matthew is not lucky.
If there is at least one people who is not elegant or not lucky, then Matthew is elderly.
Someone who is plain or not elegant is always not determined and inquisitive.
If someone is not inquisitive or he is determined, then he is not lucky.
If someone is not elegant, then he is plain, and vice versa.
Someone is determined and not plain if and only if he is inquisitive and elegant.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Kianna is plain and Kianna is inquisitive.
Matthew being not inquisitive or Lane being lucky implies that Bowen is elegant.
It can be concluded that Matthew is elderly once knowing that Kianna is plain and Bruno is not determined. | Lane is determined. | contradiction |
Hector is not elegant.
Lane is not inquisitive.
Lane is lucky.
Matthew is inquisitive.
Matthew is not lucky.
Bowen is elegant.
Bruno is not lucky.
Lane is elegant.
Lane is not plain.
Lane is not determined.
Bruno is inquisitive.
Alisa is inquisitive.Someone who is plain is always both not inquisitive and elegant.
If there is at least one people who is both not plain and not elegant, then Matthew is not inquisitive.
If there is nobody who is not not elegant, then Matthew is not inquisitive.
It can be concluded that Alisa is inquisitive and Bruno is not plain once knowing that Alisa is elderly and Matthew is not lucky.
If there is at least one people who is not elegant or not lucky, then Matthew is elderly.
Someone who is plain or not elegant is always not determined and inquisitive.
If someone is not inquisitive or he is determined, then he is not lucky.
If someone is not elegant, then he is plain, and vice versa.
Someone is determined and not plain if and only if he is inquisitive and elegant.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Kianna is plain and Kianna is inquisitive.
Matthew being not inquisitive or Lane being lucky implies that Bowen is elegant.
It can be concluded that Matthew is elderly once knowing that Kianna is plain and Bruno is not determined. | Lane is elegant. | entailment |
Hector is not elegant.
Lane is not inquisitive.
Lane is lucky.
Matthew is inquisitive.
Matthew is not lucky.
Bowen is elegant.
Bruno is not lucky.
Lane is elegant.
Lane is not plain.
Lane is not determined.
Bruno is inquisitive.
Alisa is inquisitive.Someone who is plain is always both not inquisitive and elegant.
If there is at least one people who is both not plain and not elegant, then Matthew is not inquisitive.
If there is nobody who is not not elegant, then Matthew is not inquisitive.
It can be concluded that Alisa is inquisitive and Bruno is not plain once knowing that Alisa is elderly and Matthew is not lucky.
If there is at least one people who is not elegant or not lucky, then Matthew is elderly.
Someone who is plain or not elegant is always not determined and inquisitive.
If someone is not inquisitive or he is determined, then he is not lucky.
If someone is not elegant, then he is plain, and vice versa.
Someone is determined and not plain if and only if he is inquisitive and elegant.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Kianna is plain and Kianna is inquisitive.
Matthew being not inquisitive or Lane being lucky implies that Bowen is elegant.
It can be concluded that Matthew is elderly once knowing that Kianna is plain and Bruno is not determined. | Hector is elegant. | self_contradiction |
Hector is not elegant.
Lane is not inquisitive.
Lane is lucky.
Matthew is inquisitive.
Matthew is not lucky.
Bowen is elegant.
Bruno is not lucky.
Lane is elegant.
Lane is not plain.
Lane is not determined.
Bruno is inquisitive.
Alisa is inquisitive.Someone who is plain is always both not inquisitive and elegant.
If there is at least one people who is both not plain and not elegant, then Matthew is not inquisitive.
If there is nobody who is not not elegant, then Matthew is not inquisitive.
It can be concluded that Alisa is inquisitive and Bruno is not plain once knowing that Alisa is elderly and Matthew is not lucky.
If there is at least one people who is not elegant or not lucky, then Matthew is elderly.
Someone who is plain or not elegant is always not determined and inquisitive.
If someone is not inquisitive or he is determined, then he is not lucky.
If someone is not elegant, then he is plain, and vice versa.
Someone is determined and not plain if and only if he is inquisitive and elegant.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Kianna is plain and Kianna is inquisitive.
Matthew being not inquisitive or Lane being lucky implies that Bowen is elegant.
It can be concluded that Matthew is elderly once knowing that Kianna is plain and Bruno is not determined. | Bowen is elegant. | entailment |
Hector is not elegant.
Lane is not inquisitive.
Lane is lucky.
Matthew is inquisitive.
Matthew is not lucky.
Bowen is elegant.
Bruno is not lucky.
Lane is elegant.
Lane is not plain.
Lane is not determined.
Bruno is inquisitive.
Alisa is inquisitive.Someone who is plain is always both not inquisitive and elegant.
If there is at least one people who is both not plain and not elegant, then Matthew is not inquisitive.
If there is nobody who is not not elegant, then Matthew is not inquisitive.
It can be concluded that Alisa is inquisitive and Bruno is not plain once knowing that Alisa is elderly and Matthew is not lucky.
If there is at least one people who is not elegant or not lucky, then Matthew is elderly.
Someone who is plain or not elegant is always not determined and inquisitive.
If someone is not inquisitive or he is determined, then he is not lucky.
If someone is not elegant, then he is plain, and vice versa.
Someone is determined and not plain if and only if he is inquisitive and elegant.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Kianna is plain and Kianna is inquisitive.
Matthew being not inquisitive or Lane being lucky implies that Bowen is elegant.
It can be concluded that Matthew is elderly once knowing that Kianna is plain and Bruno is not determined. | Matthew is plain. | neutral |
Hector is not elegant.
Lane is not inquisitive.
Lane is lucky.
Matthew is inquisitive.
Matthew is not lucky.
Bowen is elegant.
Bruno is not lucky.
Lane is elegant.
Lane is not plain.
Lane is not determined.
Bruno is inquisitive.
Alisa is inquisitive.Someone who is plain is always both not inquisitive and elegant.
If there is at least one people who is both not plain and not elegant, then Matthew is not inquisitive.
If there is nobody who is not not elegant, then Matthew is not inquisitive.
It can be concluded that Alisa is inquisitive and Bruno is not plain once knowing that Alisa is elderly and Matthew is not lucky.
If there is at least one people who is not elegant or not lucky, then Matthew is elderly.
Someone who is plain or not elegant is always not determined and inquisitive.
If someone is not inquisitive or he is determined, then he is not lucky.
If someone is not elegant, then he is plain, and vice versa.
Someone is determined and not plain if and only if he is inquisitive and elegant.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Kianna is plain and Kianna is inquisitive.
Matthew being not inquisitive or Lane being lucky implies that Bowen is elegant.
It can be concluded that Matthew is elderly once knowing that Kianna is plain and Bruno is not determined. | Kianna is not plain. | self_contradiction |
Hector is not elegant.
Lane is not inquisitive.
Lane is lucky.
Matthew is inquisitive.
Matthew is not lucky.
Bowen is elegant.
Bruno is not lucky.
Lane is elegant.
Lane is not plain.
Lane is not determined.
Bruno is inquisitive.
Alisa is inquisitive.Someone who is plain is always both not inquisitive and elegant.
If there is at least one people who is both not plain and not elegant, then Matthew is not inquisitive.
If there is nobody who is not not elegant, then Matthew is not inquisitive.
It can be concluded that Alisa is inquisitive and Bruno is not plain once knowing that Alisa is elderly and Matthew is not lucky.
If there is at least one people who is not elegant or not lucky, then Matthew is elderly.
Someone who is plain or not elegant is always not determined and inquisitive.
If someone is not inquisitive or he is determined, then he is not lucky.
If someone is not elegant, then he is plain, and vice versa.
Someone is determined and not plain if and only if he is inquisitive and elegant.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Kianna is plain and Kianna is inquisitive.
Matthew being not inquisitive or Lane being lucky implies that Bowen is elegant.
It can be concluded that Matthew is elderly once knowing that Kianna is plain and Bruno is not determined. | Matthew is not elderly. | contradiction |
Hector is not elegant.
Lane is not inquisitive.
Lane is lucky.
Matthew is inquisitive.
Matthew is not lucky.
Bowen is elegant.
Bruno is not lucky.
Lane is elegant.
Lane is not plain.
Lane is not determined.
Bruno is inquisitive.
Alisa is inquisitive.Someone who is plain is always both not inquisitive and elegant.
If there is at least one people who is both not plain and not elegant, then Matthew is not inquisitive.
If there is nobody who is not not elegant, then Matthew is not inquisitive.
It can be concluded that Alisa is inquisitive and Bruno is not plain once knowing that Alisa is elderly and Matthew is not lucky.
If there is at least one people who is not elegant or not lucky, then Matthew is elderly.
Someone who is plain or not elegant is always not determined and inquisitive.
If someone is not inquisitive or he is determined, then he is not lucky.
If someone is not elegant, then he is plain, and vice versa.
Someone is determined and not plain if and only if he is inquisitive and elegant.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Kianna is plain and Kianna is inquisitive.
Matthew being not inquisitive or Lane being lucky implies that Bowen is elegant.
It can be concluded that Matthew is elderly once knowing that Kianna is plain and Bruno is not determined. | Matthew is elderly. | entailment |
Hector is not elegant.
Lane is not inquisitive.
Lane is lucky.
Matthew is inquisitive.
Matthew is not lucky.
Bowen is elegant.
Bruno is not lucky.
Lane is elegant.
Lane is not plain.
Lane is not determined.
Bruno is inquisitive.
Alisa is inquisitive.Someone who is plain is always both not inquisitive and elegant.
If there is at least one people who is both not plain and not elegant, then Matthew is not inquisitive.
If there is nobody who is not not elegant, then Matthew is not inquisitive.
It can be concluded that Alisa is inquisitive and Bruno is not plain once knowing that Alisa is elderly and Matthew is not lucky.
If there is at least one people who is not elegant or not lucky, then Matthew is elderly.
Someone who is plain or not elegant is always not determined and inquisitive.
If someone is not inquisitive or he is determined, then he is not lucky.
If someone is not elegant, then he is plain, and vice versa.
Someone is determined and not plain if and only if he is inquisitive and elegant.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Kianna is plain and Kianna is inquisitive.
Matthew being not inquisitive or Lane being lucky implies that Bowen is elegant.
It can be concluded that Matthew is elderly once knowing that Kianna is plain and Bruno is not determined. | Bruno is not elegant. | neutral |
Hector is not elegant.
Lane is not inquisitive.
Lane is lucky.
Matthew is inquisitive.
Matthew is not lucky.
Bowen is elegant.
Bruno is not lucky.
Lane is elegant.
Lane is not plain.
Lane is not determined.
Bruno is inquisitive.
Alisa is inquisitive.Someone who is plain is always both not inquisitive and elegant.
If there is at least one people who is both not plain and not elegant, then Matthew is not inquisitive.
If there is nobody who is not not elegant, then Matthew is not inquisitive.
It can be concluded that Alisa is inquisitive and Bruno is not plain once knowing that Alisa is elderly and Matthew is not lucky.
If there is at least one people who is not elegant or not lucky, then Matthew is elderly.
Someone who is plain or not elegant is always not determined and inquisitive.
If someone is not inquisitive or he is determined, then he is not lucky.
If someone is not elegant, then he is plain, and vice versa.
Someone is determined and not plain if and only if he is inquisitive and elegant.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Kianna is plain and Kianna is inquisitive.
Matthew being not inquisitive or Lane being lucky implies that Bowen is elegant.
It can be concluded that Matthew is elderly once knowing that Kianna is plain and Bruno is not determined. | Bowen is not elegant. | contradiction |
Hector is not elegant.
Lane is not inquisitive.
Lane is lucky.
Matthew is inquisitive.
Matthew is not lucky.
Bowen is elegant.
Bruno is not lucky.
Lane is elegant.
Lane is not plain.
Lane is not determined.
Bruno is inquisitive.
Alisa is inquisitive.Someone who is plain is always both not inquisitive and elegant.
If there is at least one people who is both not plain and not elegant, then Matthew is not inquisitive.
If there is nobody who is not not elegant, then Matthew is not inquisitive.
It can be concluded that Alisa is inquisitive and Bruno is not plain once knowing that Alisa is elderly and Matthew is not lucky.
If there is at least one people who is not elegant or not lucky, then Matthew is elderly.
Someone who is plain or not elegant is always not determined and inquisitive.
If someone is not inquisitive or he is determined, then he is not lucky.
If someone is not elegant, then he is plain, and vice versa.
Someone is determined and not plain if and only if he is inquisitive and elegant.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Kianna is plain and Kianna is inquisitive.
Matthew being not inquisitive or Lane being lucky implies that Bowen is elegant.
It can be concluded that Matthew is elderly once knowing that Kianna is plain and Bruno is not determined. | Hector is not determined. | self_contradiction |
Hector is not elegant.
Lane is not inquisitive.
Lane is lucky.
Matthew is inquisitive.
Matthew is not lucky.
Bowen is elegant.
Bruno is not lucky.
Lane is elegant.
Lane is not plain.
Lane is not determined.
Bruno is inquisitive.
Alisa is inquisitive.Someone who is plain is always both not inquisitive and elegant.
If there is at least one people who is both not plain and not elegant, then Matthew is not inquisitive.
If there is nobody who is not not elegant, then Matthew is not inquisitive.
It can be concluded that Alisa is inquisitive and Bruno is not plain once knowing that Alisa is elderly and Matthew is not lucky.
If there is at least one people who is not elegant or not lucky, then Matthew is elderly.
Someone who is plain or not elegant is always not determined and inquisitive.
If someone is not inquisitive or he is determined, then he is not lucky.
If someone is not elegant, then he is plain, and vice versa.
Someone is determined and not plain if and only if he is inquisitive and elegant.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Kianna is plain and Kianna is inquisitive.
Matthew being not inquisitive or Lane being lucky implies that Bowen is elegant.
It can be concluded that Matthew is elderly once knowing that Kianna is plain and Bruno is not determined. | Matthew is not elegant. | neutral |
Hector is not elegant.
Lane is not inquisitive.
Lane is lucky.
Matthew is inquisitive.
Matthew is not lucky.
Bowen is elegant.
Bruno is not lucky.
Lane is elegant.
Lane is not plain.
Lane is not determined.
Bruno is inquisitive.
Alisa is inquisitive.Someone who is plain is always both not inquisitive and elegant.
If there is at least one people who is both not plain and not elegant, then Matthew is not inquisitive.
If there is nobody who is not not elegant, then Matthew is not inquisitive.
It can be concluded that Alisa is inquisitive and Bruno is not plain once knowing that Alisa is elderly and Matthew is not lucky.
If there is at least one people who is not elegant or not lucky, then Matthew is elderly.
Someone who is plain or not elegant is always not determined and inquisitive.
If someone is not inquisitive or he is determined, then he is not lucky.
If someone is not elegant, then he is plain, and vice versa.
Someone is determined and not plain if and only if he is inquisitive and elegant.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Kianna is plain and Kianna is inquisitive.
Matthew being not inquisitive or Lane being lucky implies that Bowen is elegant.
It can be concluded that Matthew is elderly once knowing that Kianna is plain and Bruno is not determined. | Alisa is inquisitive. | entailment |
Arlen is basic.
Antonio is realistic.
Chatwin is not realistic.
Shelley is not careful.
Antonio is not careful.
Gresham is not basic.
Jeremiah is not careful.
Jeremiah is sane.
Arlen is sane.
Neville is careful.
Chatwin is skinny.
Antonio is not sane.Gresham being not realistic or Chatwin being basic implies that Shelley is not careful.
It can be concluded that Shelley is not skinny and Chatwin is careful once knowing that Arlen is not unhappy.
If Gresham is basic, then Shelley is not skinny and Jeremiah is not realistic.
If everyone is realistic or not skinny, then Neville is sane.
If there is at least one people who is either not sane or not realistic, then Arlen is not unhappy and Antonio is skinny.
Someone who is skinny or basic is always not sane and unhappy.
Neville being basic implies that Chatwin is unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is skinny, then Shelley is not sane.
Jeremiah is sane if and only if Shelley is realistic.
Someone who is both not basic and not careful is always not sane.
If someone is unhappy, then he is both realistic and basic.
Shelley is not skinny and Chatwin is not basic if and only if Jeremiah is sane and Jeremiah is not realistic. | Jeremiah is realistic. | neutral |
Arlen is basic.
Antonio is realistic.
Chatwin is not realistic.
Shelley is not careful.
Antonio is not careful.
Gresham is not basic.
Jeremiah is not careful.
Jeremiah is sane.
Arlen is sane.
Neville is careful.
Chatwin is skinny.
Antonio is not sane.Gresham being not realistic or Chatwin being basic implies that Shelley is not careful.
It can be concluded that Shelley is not skinny and Chatwin is careful once knowing that Arlen is not unhappy.
If Gresham is basic, then Shelley is not skinny and Jeremiah is not realistic.
If everyone is realistic or not skinny, then Neville is sane.
If there is at least one people who is either not sane or not realistic, then Arlen is not unhappy and Antonio is skinny.
Someone who is skinny or basic is always not sane and unhappy.
Neville being basic implies that Chatwin is unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is skinny, then Shelley is not sane.
Jeremiah is sane if and only if Shelley is realistic.
Someone who is both not basic and not careful is always not sane.
If someone is unhappy, then he is both realistic and basic.
Shelley is not skinny and Chatwin is not basic if and only if Jeremiah is sane and Jeremiah is not realistic. | Jeremiah is basic. | neutral |
Arlen is basic.
Antonio is realistic.
Chatwin is not realistic.
Shelley is not careful.
Antonio is not careful.
Gresham is not basic.
Jeremiah is not careful.
Jeremiah is sane.
Arlen is sane.
Neville is careful.
Chatwin is skinny.
Antonio is not sane.Gresham being not realistic or Chatwin being basic implies that Shelley is not careful.
It can be concluded that Shelley is not skinny and Chatwin is careful once knowing that Arlen is not unhappy.
If Gresham is basic, then Shelley is not skinny and Jeremiah is not realistic.
If everyone is realistic or not skinny, then Neville is sane.
If there is at least one people who is either not sane or not realistic, then Arlen is not unhappy and Antonio is skinny.
Someone who is skinny or basic is always not sane and unhappy.
Neville being basic implies that Chatwin is unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is skinny, then Shelley is not sane.
Jeremiah is sane if and only if Shelley is realistic.
Someone who is both not basic and not careful is always not sane.
If someone is unhappy, then he is both realistic and basic.
Shelley is not skinny and Chatwin is not basic if and only if Jeremiah is sane and Jeremiah is not realistic. | Arlen is sane. | self_contradiction |
Arlen is basic.
Antonio is realistic.
Chatwin is not realistic.
Shelley is not careful.
Antonio is not careful.
Gresham is not basic.
Jeremiah is not careful.
Jeremiah is sane.
Arlen is sane.
Neville is careful.
Chatwin is skinny.
Antonio is not sane.Gresham being not realistic or Chatwin being basic implies that Shelley is not careful.
It can be concluded that Shelley is not skinny and Chatwin is careful once knowing that Arlen is not unhappy.
If Gresham is basic, then Shelley is not skinny and Jeremiah is not realistic.
If everyone is realistic or not skinny, then Neville is sane.
If there is at least one people who is either not sane or not realistic, then Arlen is not unhappy and Antonio is skinny.
Someone who is skinny or basic is always not sane and unhappy.
Neville being basic implies that Chatwin is unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is skinny, then Shelley is not sane.
Jeremiah is sane if and only if Shelley is realistic.
Someone who is both not basic and not careful is always not sane.
If someone is unhappy, then he is both realistic and basic.
Shelley is not skinny and Chatwin is not basic if and only if Jeremiah is sane and Jeremiah is not realistic. | Antonio is not unhappy. | contradiction |
Arlen is basic.
Antonio is realistic.
Chatwin is not realistic.
Shelley is not careful.
Antonio is not careful.
Gresham is not basic.
Jeremiah is not careful.
Jeremiah is sane.
Arlen is sane.
Neville is careful.
Chatwin is skinny.
Antonio is not sane.Gresham being not realistic or Chatwin being basic implies that Shelley is not careful.
It can be concluded that Shelley is not skinny and Chatwin is careful once knowing that Arlen is not unhappy.
If Gresham is basic, then Shelley is not skinny and Jeremiah is not realistic.
If everyone is realistic or not skinny, then Neville is sane.
If there is at least one people who is either not sane or not realistic, then Arlen is not unhappy and Antonio is skinny.
Someone who is skinny or basic is always not sane and unhappy.
Neville being basic implies that Chatwin is unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is skinny, then Shelley is not sane.
Jeremiah is sane if and only if Shelley is realistic.
Someone who is both not basic and not careful is always not sane.
If someone is unhappy, then he is both realistic and basic.
Shelley is not skinny and Chatwin is not basic if and only if Jeremiah is sane and Jeremiah is not realistic. | Shelley is unhappy. | neutral |
Arlen is basic.
Antonio is realistic.
Chatwin is not realistic.
Shelley is not careful.
Antonio is not careful.
Gresham is not basic.
Jeremiah is not careful.
Jeremiah is sane.
Arlen is sane.
Neville is careful.
Chatwin is skinny.
Antonio is not sane.Gresham being not realistic or Chatwin being basic implies that Shelley is not careful.
It can be concluded that Shelley is not skinny and Chatwin is careful once knowing that Arlen is not unhappy.
If Gresham is basic, then Shelley is not skinny and Jeremiah is not realistic.
If everyone is realistic or not skinny, then Neville is sane.
If there is at least one people who is either not sane or not realistic, then Arlen is not unhappy and Antonio is skinny.
Someone who is skinny or basic is always not sane and unhappy.
Neville being basic implies that Chatwin is unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is skinny, then Shelley is not sane.
Jeremiah is sane if and only if Shelley is realistic.
Someone who is both not basic and not careful is always not sane.
If someone is unhappy, then he is both realistic and basic.
Shelley is not skinny and Chatwin is not basic if and only if Jeremiah is sane and Jeremiah is not realistic. | Chatwin is realistic. | self_contradiction |
Arlen is basic.
Antonio is realistic.
Chatwin is not realistic.
Shelley is not careful.
Antonio is not careful.
Gresham is not basic.
Jeremiah is not careful.
Jeremiah is sane.
Arlen is sane.
Neville is careful.
Chatwin is skinny.
Antonio is not sane.Gresham being not realistic or Chatwin being basic implies that Shelley is not careful.
It can be concluded that Shelley is not skinny and Chatwin is careful once knowing that Arlen is not unhappy.
If Gresham is basic, then Shelley is not skinny and Jeremiah is not realistic.
If everyone is realistic or not skinny, then Neville is sane.
If there is at least one people who is either not sane or not realistic, then Arlen is not unhappy and Antonio is skinny.
Someone who is skinny or basic is always not sane and unhappy.
Neville being basic implies that Chatwin is unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is skinny, then Shelley is not sane.
Jeremiah is sane if and only if Shelley is realistic.
Someone who is both not basic and not careful is always not sane.
If someone is unhappy, then he is both realistic and basic.
Shelley is not skinny and Chatwin is not basic if and only if Jeremiah is sane and Jeremiah is not realistic. | Arlen is basic. | entailment |
Arlen is basic.
Antonio is realistic.
Chatwin is not realistic.
Shelley is not careful.
Antonio is not careful.
Gresham is not basic.
Jeremiah is not careful.
Jeremiah is sane.
Arlen is sane.
Neville is careful.
Chatwin is skinny.
Antonio is not sane.Gresham being not realistic or Chatwin being basic implies that Shelley is not careful.
It can be concluded that Shelley is not skinny and Chatwin is careful once knowing that Arlen is not unhappy.
If Gresham is basic, then Shelley is not skinny and Jeremiah is not realistic.
If everyone is realistic or not skinny, then Neville is sane.
If there is at least one people who is either not sane or not realistic, then Arlen is not unhappy and Antonio is skinny.
Someone who is skinny or basic is always not sane and unhappy.
Neville being basic implies that Chatwin is unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is skinny, then Shelley is not sane.
Jeremiah is sane if and only if Shelley is realistic.
Someone who is both not basic and not careful is always not sane.
If someone is unhappy, then he is both realistic and basic.
Shelley is not skinny and Chatwin is not basic if and only if Jeremiah is sane and Jeremiah is not realistic. | Jeremiah is not skinny. | neutral |
Arlen is basic.
Antonio is realistic.
Chatwin is not realistic.
Shelley is not careful.
Antonio is not careful.
Gresham is not basic.
Jeremiah is not careful.
Jeremiah is sane.
Arlen is sane.
Neville is careful.
Chatwin is skinny.
Antonio is not sane.Gresham being not realistic or Chatwin being basic implies that Shelley is not careful.
It can be concluded that Shelley is not skinny and Chatwin is careful once knowing that Arlen is not unhappy.
If Gresham is basic, then Shelley is not skinny and Jeremiah is not realistic.
If everyone is realistic or not skinny, then Neville is sane.
If there is at least one people who is either not sane or not realistic, then Arlen is not unhappy and Antonio is skinny.
Someone who is skinny or basic is always not sane and unhappy.
Neville being basic implies that Chatwin is unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is skinny, then Shelley is not sane.
Jeremiah is sane if and only if Shelley is realistic.
Someone who is both not basic and not careful is always not sane.
If someone is unhappy, then he is both realistic and basic.
Shelley is not skinny and Chatwin is not basic if and only if Jeremiah is sane and Jeremiah is not realistic. | Chatwin is not skinny. | contradiction |
Arlen is basic.
Antonio is realistic.
Chatwin is not realistic.
Shelley is not careful.
Antonio is not careful.
Gresham is not basic.
Jeremiah is not careful.
Jeremiah is sane.
Arlen is sane.
Neville is careful.
Chatwin is skinny.
Antonio is not sane.Gresham being not realistic or Chatwin being basic implies that Shelley is not careful.
It can be concluded that Shelley is not skinny and Chatwin is careful once knowing that Arlen is not unhappy.
If Gresham is basic, then Shelley is not skinny and Jeremiah is not realistic.
If everyone is realistic or not skinny, then Neville is sane.
If there is at least one people who is either not sane or not realistic, then Arlen is not unhappy and Antonio is skinny.
Someone who is skinny or basic is always not sane and unhappy.
Neville being basic implies that Chatwin is unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is skinny, then Shelley is not sane.
Jeremiah is sane if and only if Shelley is realistic.
Someone who is both not basic and not careful is always not sane.
If someone is unhappy, then he is both realistic and basic.
Shelley is not skinny and Chatwin is not basic if and only if Jeremiah is sane and Jeremiah is not realistic. | Chatwin is not careful. | contradiction |
Arlen is basic.
Antonio is realistic.
Chatwin is not realistic.
Shelley is not careful.
Antonio is not careful.
Gresham is not basic.
Jeremiah is not careful.
Jeremiah is sane.
Arlen is sane.
Neville is careful.
Chatwin is skinny.
Antonio is not sane.Gresham being not realistic or Chatwin being basic implies that Shelley is not careful.
It can be concluded that Shelley is not skinny and Chatwin is careful once knowing that Arlen is not unhappy.
If Gresham is basic, then Shelley is not skinny and Jeremiah is not realistic.
If everyone is realistic or not skinny, then Neville is sane.
If there is at least one people who is either not sane or not realistic, then Arlen is not unhappy and Antonio is skinny.
Someone who is skinny or basic is always not sane and unhappy.
Neville being basic implies that Chatwin is unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is skinny, then Shelley is not sane.
Jeremiah is sane if and only if Shelley is realistic.
Someone who is both not basic and not careful is always not sane.
If someone is unhappy, then he is both realistic and basic.
Shelley is not skinny and Chatwin is not basic if and only if Jeremiah is sane and Jeremiah is not realistic. | Neville is careful. | entailment |
Arlen is basic.
Antonio is realistic.
Chatwin is not realistic.
Shelley is not careful.
Antonio is not careful.
Gresham is not basic.
Jeremiah is not careful.
Jeremiah is sane.
Arlen is sane.
Neville is careful.
Chatwin is skinny.
Antonio is not sane.Gresham being not realistic or Chatwin being basic implies that Shelley is not careful.
It can be concluded that Shelley is not skinny and Chatwin is careful once knowing that Arlen is not unhappy.
If Gresham is basic, then Shelley is not skinny and Jeremiah is not realistic.
If everyone is realistic or not skinny, then Neville is sane.
If there is at least one people who is either not sane or not realistic, then Arlen is not unhappy and Antonio is skinny.
Someone who is skinny or basic is always not sane and unhappy.
Neville being basic implies that Chatwin is unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is skinny, then Shelley is not sane.
Jeremiah is sane if and only if Shelley is realistic.
Someone who is both not basic and not careful is always not sane.
If someone is unhappy, then he is both realistic and basic.
Shelley is not skinny and Chatwin is not basic if and only if Jeremiah is sane and Jeremiah is not realistic. | Shelley is not realistic. | contradiction |
Arlen is basic.
Antonio is realistic.
Chatwin is not realistic.
Shelley is not careful.
Antonio is not careful.
Gresham is not basic.
Jeremiah is not careful.
Jeremiah is sane.
Arlen is sane.
Neville is careful.
Chatwin is skinny.
Antonio is not sane.Gresham being not realistic or Chatwin being basic implies that Shelley is not careful.
It can be concluded that Shelley is not skinny and Chatwin is careful once knowing that Arlen is not unhappy.
If Gresham is basic, then Shelley is not skinny and Jeremiah is not realistic.
If everyone is realistic or not skinny, then Neville is sane.
If there is at least one people who is either not sane or not realistic, then Arlen is not unhappy and Antonio is skinny.
Someone who is skinny or basic is always not sane and unhappy.
Neville being basic implies that Chatwin is unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is skinny, then Shelley is not sane.
Jeremiah is sane if and only if Shelley is realistic.
Someone who is both not basic and not careful is always not sane.
If someone is unhappy, then he is both realistic and basic.
Shelley is not skinny and Chatwin is not basic if and only if Jeremiah is sane and Jeremiah is not realistic. | Chatwin is not unhappy. | contradiction |
Arlen is basic.
Antonio is realistic.
Chatwin is not realistic.
Shelley is not careful.
Antonio is not careful.
Gresham is not basic.
Jeremiah is not careful.
Jeremiah is sane.
Arlen is sane.
Neville is careful.
Chatwin is skinny.
Antonio is not sane.Gresham being not realistic or Chatwin being basic implies that Shelley is not careful.
It can be concluded that Shelley is not skinny and Chatwin is careful once knowing that Arlen is not unhappy.
If Gresham is basic, then Shelley is not skinny and Jeremiah is not realistic.
If everyone is realistic or not skinny, then Neville is sane.
If there is at least one people who is either not sane or not realistic, then Arlen is not unhappy and Antonio is skinny.
Someone who is skinny or basic is always not sane and unhappy.
Neville being basic implies that Chatwin is unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is skinny, then Shelley is not sane.
Jeremiah is sane if and only if Shelley is realistic.
Someone who is both not basic and not careful is always not sane.
If someone is unhappy, then he is both realistic and basic.
Shelley is not skinny and Chatwin is not basic if and only if Jeremiah is sane and Jeremiah is not realistic. | Antonio is not sane. | entailment |
Arlen is basic.
Antonio is realistic.
Chatwin is not realistic.
Shelley is not careful.
Antonio is not careful.
Gresham is not basic.
Jeremiah is not careful.
Jeremiah is sane.
Arlen is sane.
Neville is careful.
Chatwin is skinny.
Antonio is not sane.Gresham being not realistic or Chatwin being basic implies that Shelley is not careful.
It can be concluded that Shelley is not skinny and Chatwin is careful once knowing that Arlen is not unhappy.
If Gresham is basic, then Shelley is not skinny and Jeremiah is not realistic.
If everyone is realistic or not skinny, then Neville is sane.
If there is at least one people who is either not sane or not realistic, then Arlen is not unhappy and Antonio is skinny.
Someone who is skinny or basic is always not sane and unhappy.
Neville being basic implies that Chatwin is unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is skinny, then Shelley is not sane.
Jeremiah is sane if and only if Shelley is realistic.
Someone who is both not basic and not careful is always not sane.
If someone is unhappy, then he is both realistic and basic.
Shelley is not skinny and Chatwin is not basic if and only if Jeremiah is sane and Jeremiah is not realistic. | Arlen is unhappy. | self_contradiction |
Arlen is basic.
Antonio is realistic.
Chatwin is not realistic.
Shelley is not careful.
Antonio is not careful.
Gresham is not basic.
Jeremiah is not careful.
Jeremiah is sane.
Arlen is sane.
Neville is careful.
Chatwin is skinny.
Antonio is not sane.Gresham being not realistic or Chatwin being basic implies that Shelley is not careful.
It can be concluded that Shelley is not skinny and Chatwin is careful once knowing that Arlen is not unhappy.
If Gresham is basic, then Shelley is not skinny and Jeremiah is not realistic.
If everyone is realistic or not skinny, then Neville is sane.
If there is at least one people who is either not sane or not realistic, then Arlen is not unhappy and Antonio is skinny.
Someone who is skinny or basic is always not sane and unhappy.
Neville being basic implies that Chatwin is unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is skinny, then Shelley is not sane.
Jeremiah is sane if and only if Shelley is realistic.
Someone who is both not basic and not careful is always not sane.
If someone is unhappy, then he is both realistic and basic.
Shelley is not skinny and Chatwin is not basic if and only if Jeremiah is sane and Jeremiah is not realistic. | Arlen is not unhappy. | self_contradiction |
Arlen is basic.
Antonio is realistic.
Chatwin is not realistic.
Shelley is not careful.
Antonio is not careful.
Gresham is not basic.
Jeremiah is not careful.
Jeremiah is sane.
Arlen is sane.
Neville is careful.
Chatwin is skinny.
Antonio is not sane.Gresham being not realistic or Chatwin being basic implies that Shelley is not careful.
It can be concluded that Shelley is not skinny and Chatwin is careful once knowing that Arlen is not unhappy.
If Gresham is basic, then Shelley is not skinny and Jeremiah is not realistic.
If everyone is realistic or not skinny, then Neville is sane.
If there is at least one people who is either not sane or not realistic, then Arlen is not unhappy and Antonio is skinny.
Someone who is skinny or basic is always not sane and unhappy.
Neville being basic implies that Chatwin is unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is skinny, then Shelley is not sane.
Jeremiah is sane if and only if Shelley is realistic.
Someone who is both not basic and not careful is always not sane.
If someone is unhappy, then he is both realistic and basic.
Shelley is not skinny and Chatwin is not basic if and only if Jeremiah is sane and Jeremiah is not realistic. | Jeremiah is unhappy. | neutral |
Arlen is basic.
Antonio is realistic.
Chatwin is not realistic.
Shelley is not careful.
Antonio is not careful.
Gresham is not basic.
Jeremiah is not careful.
Jeremiah is sane.
Arlen is sane.
Neville is careful.
Chatwin is skinny.
Antonio is not sane.Gresham being not realistic or Chatwin being basic implies that Shelley is not careful.
It can be concluded that Shelley is not skinny and Chatwin is careful once knowing that Arlen is not unhappy.
If Gresham is basic, then Shelley is not skinny and Jeremiah is not realistic.
If everyone is realistic or not skinny, then Neville is sane.
If there is at least one people who is either not sane or not realistic, then Arlen is not unhappy and Antonio is skinny.
Someone who is skinny or basic is always not sane and unhappy.
Neville being basic implies that Chatwin is unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is skinny, then Shelley is not sane.
Jeremiah is sane if and only if Shelley is realistic.
Someone who is both not basic and not careful is always not sane.
If someone is unhappy, then he is both realistic and basic.
Shelley is not skinny and Chatwin is not basic if and only if Jeremiah is sane and Jeremiah is not realistic. | Shelley is not sane. | entailment |
Arlen is basic.
Antonio is realistic.
Chatwin is not realistic.
Shelley is not careful.
Antonio is not careful.
Gresham is not basic.
Jeremiah is not careful.
Jeremiah is sane.
Arlen is sane.
Neville is careful.
Chatwin is skinny.
Antonio is not sane.Gresham being not realistic or Chatwin being basic implies that Shelley is not careful.
It can be concluded that Shelley is not skinny and Chatwin is careful once knowing that Arlen is not unhappy.
If Gresham is basic, then Shelley is not skinny and Jeremiah is not realistic.
If everyone is realistic or not skinny, then Neville is sane.
If there is at least one people who is either not sane or not realistic, then Arlen is not unhappy and Antonio is skinny.
Someone who is skinny or basic is always not sane and unhappy.
Neville being basic implies that Chatwin is unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is skinny, then Shelley is not sane.
Jeremiah is sane if and only if Shelley is realistic.
Someone who is both not basic and not careful is always not sane.
If someone is unhappy, then he is both realistic and basic.
Shelley is not skinny and Chatwin is not basic if and only if Jeremiah is sane and Jeremiah is not realistic. | Chatwin is not realistic. | self_contradiction |
Arlen is basic.
Antonio is realistic.
Chatwin is not realistic.
Shelley is not careful.
Antonio is not careful.
Gresham is not basic.
Jeremiah is not careful.
Jeremiah is sane.
Arlen is sane.
Neville is careful.
Chatwin is skinny.
Antonio is not sane.Gresham being not realistic or Chatwin being basic implies that Shelley is not careful.
It can be concluded that Shelley is not skinny and Chatwin is careful once knowing that Arlen is not unhappy.
If Gresham is basic, then Shelley is not skinny and Jeremiah is not realistic.
If everyone is realistic or not skinny, then Neville is sane.
If there is at least one people who is either not sane or not realistic, then Arlen is not unhappy and Antonio is skinny.
Someone who is skinny or basic is always not sane and unhappy.
Neville being basic implies that Chatwin is unhappy.
If there is at least one people who is skinny, then Shelley is not sane.
Jeremiah is sane if and only if Shelley is realistic.
Someone who is both not basic and not careful is always not sane.
If someone is unhappy, then he is both realistic and basic.
Shelley is not skinny and Chatwin is not basic if and only if Jeremiah is sane and Jeremiah is not realistic. | Antonio is not careful. | entailment |
Roswell is good.
Kerry is cold.
Maggie is not logical.
Kerry is not powerful.
Bryant is powerful.
Bryant is not good.
Kerry is not logical.
Kerry is inner.
Bryant is not cute.
Ramsey is not logical.
Roy is good.
Roswell is not cold.Ramsey being cute or Bryant being powerful implies that Heath is not cold.
Someone who is eithor not cute or not cold is always not inner.
If someone is cold, then he is both cute and good.
Ramsey being good is equivalent to Bryant being cute and Roy being powerful.
Roy being logical and Maggie being not powerful imply that Maggie is not cold.
Kerry being not cold implies that Kerry is powerful and Heath is not logical.
If Roy is good, then Kerry is not cold.
If there is nobody who is not not cute, then Kerry is good and Heath is logical.
If there is at least one people who is not cute, then Heath is not cold and Maggie is not powerful.
Roswell being powerful is equivalent to Kerry being not inner.
If someone is good, then he is not logical.
If there is someone who is good, then Roy is not cute. | Maggie is logical. | contradiction |
Roswell is good.
Kerry is cold.
Maggie is not logical.
Kerry is not powerful.
Bryant is powerful.
Bryant is not good.
Kerry is not logical.
Kerry is inner.
Bryant is not cute.
Ramsey is not logical.
Roy is good.
Roswell is not cold.Ramsey being cute or Bryant being powerful implies that Heath is not cold.
Someone who is eithor not cute or not cold is always not inner.
If someone is cold, then he is both cute and good.
Ramsey being good is equivalent to Bryant being cute and Roy being powerful.
Roy being logical and Maggie being not powerful imply that Maggie is not cold.
Kerry being not cold implies that Kerry is powerful and Heath is not logical.
If Roy is good, then Kerry is not cold.
If there is nobody who is not not cute, then Kerry is good and Heath is logical.
If there is at least one people who is not cute, then Heath is not cold and Maggie is not powerful.
Roswell being powerful is equivalent to Kerry being not inner.
If someone is good, then he is not logical.
If there is someone who is good, then Roy is not cute. | Roy is not inner. | entailment |
Roswell is good.
Kerry is cold.
Maggie is not logical.
Kerry is not powerful.
Bryant is powerful.
Bryant is not good.
Kerry is not logical.
Kerry is inner.
Bryant is not cute.
Ramsey is not logical.
Roy is good.
Roswell is not cold.Ramsey being cute or Bryant being powerful implies that Heath is not cold.
Someone who is eithor not cute or not cold is always not inner.
If someone is cold, then he is both cute and good.
Ramsey being good is equivalent to Bryant being cute and Roy being powerful.
Roy being logical and Maggie being not powerful imply that Maggie is not cold.
Kerry being not cold implies that Kerry is powerful and Heath is not logical.
If Roy is good, then Kerry is not cold.
If there is nobody who is not not cute, then Kerry is good and Heath is logical.
If there is at least one people who is not cute, then Heath is not cold and Maggie is not powerful.
Roswell being powerful is equivalent to Kerry being not inner.
If someone is good, then he is not logical.
If there is someone who is good, then Roy is not cute. | Maggie is not powerful. | entailment |
Roswell is good.
Kerry is cold.
Maggie is not logical.
Kerry is not powerful.
Bryant is powerful.
Bryant is not good.
Kerry is not logical.
Kerry is inner.
Bryant is not cute.
Ramsey is not logical.
Roy is good.
Roswell is not cold.Ramsey being cute or Bryant being powerful implies that Heath is not cold.
Someone who is eithor not cute or not cold is always not inner.
If someone is cold, then he is both cute and good.
Ramsey being good is equivalent to Bryant being cute and Roy being powerful.
Roy being logical and Maggie being not powerful imply that Maggie is not cold.
Kerry being not cold implies that Kerry is powerful and Heath is not logical.
If Roy is good, then Kerry is not cold.
If there is nobody who is not not cute, then Kerry is good and Heath is logical.
If there is at least one people who is not cute, then Heath is not cold and Maggie is not powerful.
Roswell being powerful is equivalent to Kerry being not inner.
If someone is good, then he is not logical.
If there is someone who is good, then Roy is not cute. | Bryant is not cold. | neutral |
Roswell is good.
Kerry is cold.
Maggie is not logical.
Kerry is not powerful.
Bryant is powerful.
Bryant is not good.
Kerry is not logical.
Kerry is inner.
Bryant is not cute.
Ramsey is not logical.
Roy is good.
Roswell is not cold.Ramsey being cute or Bryant being powerful implies that Heath is not cold.
Someone who is eithor not cute or not cold is always not inner.
If someone is cold, then he is both cute and good.
Ramsey being good is equivalent to Bryant being cute and Roy being powerful.
Roy being logical and Maggie being not powerful imply that Maggie is not cold.
Kerry being not cold implies that Kerry is powerful and Heath is not logical.
If Roy is good, then Kerry is not cold.
If there is nobody who is not not cute, then Kerry is good and Heath is logical.
If there is at least one people who is not cute, then Heath is not cold and Maggie is not powerful.
Roswell being powerful is equivalent to Kerry being not inner.
If someone is good, then he is not logical.
If there is someone who is good, then Roy is not cute. | Roy is good. | entailment |
Roswell is good.
Kerry is cold.
Maggie is not logical.
Kerry is not powerful.
Bryant is powerful.
Bryant is not good.
Kerry is not logical.
Kerry is inner.
Bryant is not cute.
Ramsey is not logical.
Roy is good.
Roswell is not cold.Ramsey being cute or Bryant being powerful implies that Heath is not cold.
Someone who is eithor not cute or not cold is always not inner.
If someone is cold, then he is both cute and good.
Ramsey being good is equivalent to Bryant being cute and Roy being powerful.
Roy being logical and Maggie being not powerful imply that Maggie is not cold.
Kerry being not cold implies that Kerry is powerful and Heath is not logical.
If Roy is good, then Kerry is not cold.
If there is nobody who is not not cute, then Kerry is good and Heath is logical.
If there is at least one people who is not cute, then Heath is not cold and Maggie is not powerful.
Roswell being powerful is equivalent to Kerry being not inner.
If someone is good, then he is not logical.
If there is someone who is good, then Roy is not cute. | Roswell is logical. | contradiction |
Roswell is good.
Kerry is cold.
Maggie is not logical.
Kerry is not powerful.
Bryant is powerful.
Bryant is not good.
Kerry is not logical.
Kerry is inner.
Bryant is not cute.
Ramsey is not logical.
Roy is good.
Roswell is not cold.Ramsey being cute or Bryant being powerful implies that Heath is not cold.
Someone who is eithor not cute or not cold is always not inner.
If someone is cold, then he is both cute and good.
Ramsey being good is equivalent to Bryant being cute and Roy being powerful.
Roy being logical and Maggie being not powerful imply that Maggie is not cold.
Kerry being not cold implies that Kerry is powerful and Heath is not logical.
If Roy is good, then Kerry is not cold.
If there is nobody who is not not cute, then Kerry is good and Heath is logical.
If there is at least one people who is not cute, then Heath is not cold and Maggie is not powerful.
Roswell being powerful is equivalent to Kerry being not inner.
If someone is good, then he is not logical.
If there is someone who is good, then Roy is not cute. | Kerry is powerful. | self_contradiction |
Roswell is good.
Kerry is cold.
Maggie is not logical.
Kerry is not powerful.
Bryant is powerful.
Bryant is not good.
Kerry is not logical.
Kerry is inner.
Bryant is not cute.
Ramsey is not logical.
Roy is good.
Roswell is not cold.Ramsey being cute or Bryant being powerful implies that Heath is not cold.
Someone who is eithor not cute or not cold is always not inner.
If someone is cold, then he is both cute and good.
Ramsey being good is equivalent to Bryant being cute and Roy being powerful.
Roy being logical and Maggie being not powerful imply that Maggie is not cold.
Kerry being not cold implies that Kerry is powerful and Heath is not logical.
If Roy is good, then Kerry is not cold.
If there is nobody who is not not cute, then Kerry is good and Heath is logical.
If there is at least one people who is not cute, then Heath is not cold and Maggie is not powerful.
Roswell being powerful is equivalent to Kerry being not inner.
If someone is good, then he is not logical.
If there is someone who is good, then Roy is not cute. | Heath is logical. | contradiction |
Roswell is good.
Kerry is cold.
Maggie is not logical.
Kerry is not powerful.
Bryant is powerful.
Bryant is not good.
Kerry is not logical.
Kerry is inner.
Bryant is not cute.
Ramsey is not logical.
Roy is good.
Roswell is not cold.Ramsey being cute or Bryant being powerful implies that Heath is not cold.
Someone who is eithor not cute or not cold is always not inner.
If someone is cold, then he is both cute and good.
Ramsey being good is equivalent to Bryant being cute and Roy being powerful.
Roy being logical and Maggie being not powerful imply that Maggie is not cold.
Kerry being not cold implies that Kerry is powerful and Heath is not logical.
If Roy is good, then Kerry is not cold.
If there is nobody who is not not cute, then Kerry is good and Heath is logical.
If there is at least one people who is not cute, then Heath is not cold and Maggie is not powerful.
Roswell being powerful is equivalent to Kerry being not inner.
If someone is good, then he is not logical.
If there is someone who is good, then Roy is not cute. | Ramsey is inner. | neutral |
Roswell is good.
Kerry is cold.
Maggie is not logical.
Kerry is not powerful.
Bryant is powerful.
Bryant is not good.
Kerry is not logical.
Kerry is inner.
Bryant is not cute.
Ramsey is not logical.
Roy is good.
Roswell is not cold.Ramsey being cute or Bryant being powerful implies that Heath is not cold.
Someone who is eithor not cute or not cold is always not inner.
If someone is cold, then he is both cute and good.
Ramsey being good is equivalent to Bryant being cute and Roy being powerful.
Roy being logical and Maggie being not powerful imply that Maggie is not cold.
Kerry being not cold implies that Kerry is powerful and Heath is not logical.
If Roy is good, then Kerry is not cold.
If there is nobody who is not not cute, then Kerry is good and Heath is logical.
If there is at least one people who is not cute, then Heath is not cold and Maggie is not powerful.
Roswell being powerful is equivalent to Kerry being not inner.
If someone is good, then he is not logical.
If there is someone who is good, then Roy is not cute. | Kerry is not powerful. | self_contradiction |
Roswell is good.
Kerry is cold.
Maggie is not logical.
Kerry is not powerful.
Bryant is powerful.
Bryant is not good.
Kerry is not logical.
Kerry is inner.
Bryant is not cute.
Ramsey is not logical.
Roy is good.
Roswell is not cold.Ramsey being cute or Bryant being powerful implies that Heath is not cold.
Someone who is eithor not cute or not cold is always not inner.
If someone is cold, then he is both cute and good.
Ramsey being good is equivalent to Bryant being cute and Roy being powerful.
Roy being logical and Maggie being not powerful imply that Maggie is not cold.
Kerry being not cold implies that Kerry is powerful and Heath is not logical.
If Roy is good, then Kerry is not cold.
If there is nobody who is not not cute, then Kerry is good and Heath is logical.
If there is at least one people who is not cute, then Heath is not cold and Maggie is not powerful.
Roswell being powerful is equivalent to Kerry being not inner.
If someone is good, then he is not logical.
If there is someone who is good, then Roy is not cute. | Kerry is cold. | self_contradiction |
Roswell is good.
Kerry is cold.
Maggie is not logical.
Kerry is not powerful.
Bryant is powerful.
Bryant is not good.
Kerry is not logical.
Kerry is inner.
Bryant is not cute.
Ramsey is not logical.
Roy is good.
Roswell is not cold.Ramsey being cute or Bryant being powerful implies that Heath is not cold.
Someone who is eithor not cute or not cold is always not inner.
If someone is cold, then he is both cute and good.
Ramsey being good is equivalent to Bryant being cute and Roy being powerful.
Roy being logical and Maggie being not powerful imply that Maggie is not cold.
Kerry being not cold implies that Kerry is powerful and Heath is not logical.
If Roy is good, then Kerry is not cold.
If there is nobody who is not not cute, then Kerry is good and Heath is logical.
If there is at least one people who is not cute, then Heath is not cold and Maggie is not powerful.
Roswell being powerful is equivalent to Kerry being not inner.
If someone is good, then he is not logical.
If there is someone who is good, then Roy is not cute. | Kerry is not cute. | contradiction |
Roswell is good.
Kerry is cold.
Maggie is not logical.
Kerry is not powerful.
Bryant is powerful.
Bryant is not good.
Kerry is not logical.
Kerry is inner.
Bryant is not cute.
Ramsey is not logical.
Roy is good.
Roswell is not cold.Ramsey being cute or Bryant being powerful implies that Heath is not cold.
Someone who is eithor not cute or not cold is always not inner.
If someone is cold, then he is both cute and good.
Ramsey being good is equivalent to Bryant being cute and Roy being powerful.
Roy being logical and Maggie being not powerful imply that Maggie is not cold.
Kerry being not cold implies that Kerry is powerful and Heath is not logical.
If Roy is good, then Kerry is not cold.
If there is nobody who is not not cute, then Kerry is good and Heath is logical.
If there is at least one people who is not cute, then Heath is not cold and Maggie is not powerful.
Roswell being powerful is equivalent to Kerry being not inner.
If someone is good, then he is not logical.
If there is someone who is good, then Roy is not cute. | Ramsey is not powerful. | neutral |
Roswell is good.
Kerry is cold.
Maggie is not logical.
Kerry is not powerful.
Bryant is powerful.
Bryant is not good.
Kerry is not logical.
Kerry is inner.
Bryant is not cute.
Ramsey is not logical.
Roy is good.
Roswell is not cold.Ramsey being cute or Bryant being powerful implies that Heath is not cold.
Someone who is eithor not cute or not cold is always not inner.
If someone is cold, then he is both cute and good.
Ramsey being good is equivalent to Bryant being cute and Roy being powerful.
Roy being logical and Maggie being not powerful imply that Maggie is not cold.
Kerry being not cold implies that Kerry is powerful and Heath is not logical.
If Roy is good, then Kerry is not cold.
If there is nobody who is not not cute, then Kerry is good and Heath is logical.
If there is at least one people who is not cute, then Heath is not cold and Maggie is not powerful.
Roswell being powerful is equivalent to Kerry being not inner.
If someone is good, then he is not logical.
If there is someone who is good, then Roy is not cute. | Roswell is good. | entailment |
Roswell is good.
Kerry is cold.
Maggie is not logical.
Kerry is not powerful.
Bryant is powerful.
Bryant is not good.
Kerry is not logical.
Kerry is inner.
Bryant is not cute.
Ramsey is not logical.
Roy is good.
Roswell is not cold.Ramsey being cute or Bryant being powerful implies that Heath is not cold.
Someone who is eithor not cute or not cold is always not inner.
If someone is cold, then he is both cute and good.
Ramsey being good is equivalent to Bryant being cute and Roy being powerful.
Roy being logical and Maggie being not powerful imply that Maggie is not cold.
Kerry being not cold implies that Kerry is powerful and Heath is not logical.
If Roy is good, then Kerry is not cold.
If there is nobody who is not not cute, then Kerry is good and Heath is logical.
If there is at least one people who is not cute, then Heath is not cold and Maggie is not powerful.
Roswell being powerful is equivalent to Kerry being not inner.
If someone is good, then he is not logical.
If there is someone who is good, then Roy is not cute. | Roswell is not cute. | neutral |
Roswell is good.
Kerry is cold.
Maggie is not logical.
Kerry is not powerful.
Bryant is powerful.
Bryant is not good.
Kerry is not logical.
Kerry is inner.
Bryant is not cute.
Ramsey is not logical.
Roy is good.
Roswell is not cold.Ramsey being cute or Bryant being powerful implies that Heath is not cold.
Someone who is eithor not cute or not cold is always not inner.
If someone is cold, then he is both cute and good.
Ramsey being good is equivalent to Bryant being cute and Roy being powerful.
Roy being logical and Maggie being not powerful imply that Maggie is not cold.
Kerry being not cold implies that Kerry is powerful and Heath is not logical.
If Roy is good, then Kerry is not cold.
If there is nobody who is not not cute, then Kerry is good and Heath is logical.
If there is at least one people who is not cute, then Heath is not cold and Maggie is not powerful.
Roswell being powerful is equivalent to Kerry being not inner.
If someone is good, then he is not logical.
If there is someone who is good, then Roy is not cute. | Heath is not cold. | entailment |
Roswell is good.
Kerry is cold.
Maggie is not logical.
Kerry is not powerful.
Bryant is powerful.
Bryant is not good.
Kerry is not logical.
Kerry is inner.
Bryant is not cute.
Ramsey is not logical.
Roy is good.
Roswell is not cold.Ramsey being cute or Bryant being powerful implies that Heath is not cold.
Someone who is eithor not cute or not cold is always not inner.
If someone is cold, then he is both cute and good.
Ramsey being good is equivalent to Bryant being cute and Roy being powerful.
Roy being logical and Maggie being not powerful imply that Maggie is not cold.
Kerry being not cold implies that Kerry is powerful and Heath is not logical.
If Roy is good, then Kerry is not cold.
If there is nobody who is not not cute, then Kerry is good and Heath is logical.
If there is at least one people who is not cute, then Heath is not cold and Maggie is not powerful.
Roswell being powerful is equivalent to Kerry being not inner.
If someone is good, then he is not logical.
If there is someone who is good, then Roy is not cute. | Heath is not good. | neutral |
Roswell is good.
Kerry is cold.
Maggie is not logical.
Kerry is not powerful.
Bryant is powerful.
Bryant is not good.
Kerry is not logical.
Kerry is inner.
Bryant is not cute.
Ramsey is not logical.
Roy is good.
Roswell is not cold.Ramsey being cute or Bryant being powerful implies that Heath is not cold.
Someone who is eithor not cute or not cold is always not inner.
If someone is cold, then he is both cute and good.
Ramsey being good is equivalent to Bryant being cute and Roy being powerful.
Roy being logical and Maggie being not powerful imply that Maggie is not cold.
Kerry being not cold implies that Kerry is powerful and Heath is not logical.
If Roy is good, then Kerry is not cold.
If there is nobody who is not not cute, then Kerry is good and Heath is logical.
If there is at least one people who is not cute, then Heath is not cold and Maggie is not powerful.
Roswell being powerful is equivalent to Kerry being not inner.
If someone is good, then he is not logical.
If there is someone who is good, then Roy is not cute. | Kerry is inner. | self_contradiction |
Roswell is good.
Kerry is cold.
Maggie is not logical.
Kerry is not powerful.
Bryant is powerful.
Bryant is not good.
Kerry is not logical.
Kerry is inner.
Bryant is not cute.
Ramsey is not logical.
Roy is good.
Roswell is not cold.Ramsey being cute or Bryant being powerful implies that Heath is not cold.
Someone who is eithor not cute or not cold is always not inner.
If someone is cold, then he is both cute and good.
Ramsey being good is equivalent to Bryant being cute and Roy being powerful.
Roy being logical and Maggie being not powerful imply that Maggie is not cold.
Kerry being not cold implies that Kerry is powerful and Heath is not logical.
If Roy is good, then Kerry is not cold.
If there is nobody who is not not cute, then Kerry is good and Heath is logical.
If there is at least one people who is not cute, then Heath is not cold and Maggie is not powerful.
Roswell being powerful is equivalent to Kerry being not inner.
If someone is good, then he is not logical.
If there is someone who is good, then Roy is not cute. | Kerry is not inner. | self_contradiction |
Roswell is good.
Kerry is cold.
Maggie is not logical.
Kerry is not powerful.
Bryant is powerful.
Bryant is not good.
Kerry is not logical.
Kerry is inner.
Bryant is not cute.
Ramsey is not logical.
Roy is good.
Roswell is not cold.Ramsey being cute or Bryant being powerful implies that Heath is not cold.
Someone who is eithor not cute or not cold is always not inner.
If someone is cold, then he is both cute and good.
Ramsey being good is equivalent to Bryant being cute and Roy being powerful.
Roy being logical and Maggie being not powerful imply that Maggie is not cold.
Kerry being not cold implies that Kerry is powerful and Heath is not logical.
If Roy is good, then Kerry is not cold.
If there is nobody who is not not cute, then Kerry is good and Heath is logical.
If there is at least one people who is not cute, then Heath is not cold and Maggie is not powerful.
Roswell being powerful is equivalent to Kerry being not inner.
If someone is good, then he is not logical.
If there is someone who is good, then Roy is not cute. | Roswell is not good. | contradiction |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.