tasksource/jigsaw_toxicity · Datasets at Hugging Face

id stringlengths 16 16	comment_text stringlengths 6 5k	toxic int64 0 1	severe_toxic int64 0 1	obscene int64 0 1	insult int64 0 1
e59353d3a3427eef	I think the David Letterman argument is fine, however one must ask whether to highlight particular disputes at all is relevant as the entire document highlights nothing but contentious issues...however I beileve Bill Oreilly likes to be in contentious issues. As to the specifics of why I erased it....you provided no dispute quotations taken from Bill Oreilly. He had some zingers that nailed Dave hard what was chosen was the weakest of his points vs the strongest of lettermans... Rewrite it. Oreilly's comment about not calling people who blow up innocent women and children on his show as a devestating blow to Letterman and a clear clever and concise statement.	0	0	0	0
e59569f3d89469d5	The main reason why I haven't formally retired from Wikipedia (if though I want to) is I don't want to get the abusive vandal the satisfaction that's the main reason. Because life is to short to put up with this type of thing	0	0	0	0
e597b77c5083e484	We'll add something about it when someone presents a reliable source discussing it. __	0	0	0	0
e59a9565f7df164b	I did NOT attack you personally. I did NOT violate any policy. That is a figment of your imagination. I attacked the country of France. Now, back to the article. You keep telling me to focus on the article but neither you, or have explained why the rumour, which is the subject of this tread, should be on the Rumsfeld Wikipedia page. As far as I can tell I have asked both of you for your input on that topic at least two times each and I haven't got a respond to that topic yet. I have received is a lecture from explaining his personal opinion that I should refer to Kerry is a Loser and from about logical fallacy of my argument. But I haven't heard one comment from either one of you on the actual topic of discussion which is the rumour listed about about Rumsfeld. I will repeat. Remember you really shouldn't lecture someone about sticking to the facts at hand unless you yourself actually comment on the facts at hand, which you haven't done yet. Unless there is some evidence provided for the Rumsfeld rumour then it will NOT go into the article and if anyone puts it in the article then I will rip it out.- 17:33, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)	0	0	0	0
e59b37ac6a2e06e4	" Liberal POV ""The package includes provisions for lowering import tariffs and agricultural subsidies, making it easier for developing countries to compete with the developed world in global markets."" This sentence has a clear economic liberal viewpoint. Who can guarantee these countries will really be more competitive? There are some schools of thought that disagree on this notion; to cite a few: protectionism, developmentalism and economic nationalism. I changed the wording to make it clear that this is a POV, but this was reverted. Some feedback on it would be good. "	0	0	0	0
e59ba61bba910280	"An interesting observation, considering the repeated efforts to edit out (and block users to add it) references to the Boston College one-historic campus ""now covered in vast expanses of concrete."" "	0	0	0	0
e59d332b50e3f310	" Would you take on a project?? There are two users, currently both with a week-long block for edit warring over an article Che Guevara (photo), although the blocking admin is vacillating, suggesting an RFC which I know is useless. One of the editors, User:Redthoreau, I tangled with a while ago and ultimately ended up nominating the article in question for FAR, Wikipedia:Featured article review/Che Guevara/archive1. The other editor User:Damiens.rf I don't know, but his current complain is that 61 quotations in an article is too many. The blocking admin User talk:EdJohnston wants to handle the situation constructively but does not know how. I suggested to him that someone like you, an experienced editor might be willing to be a neutral editor between the two, focused on article quality. I suggested you (and perhaps also User talk:Geometry guy) to direct the warring editors to concentrate on article quality. My experience in the past with User:Redthoreau is that he does rather well when a ""father figure"" type takes an interest. Some of his obnoxiousness, I believe, is due to youthful aggression and ignorance. I think he would respond positively to someone whose goal was to produce a quality article. As he dominates all things Guevara, the only way to improve the Guevara articles on Wikipedia is to move Redthoreau over onto the side of the forces of good. Since the focus would just be this one article, and your job would be to render advice/judgement on article criteria, I think the job would not be unduly burdensome. Redthoreau had a past mentor-like relationship with User:Coppertwig and did very well when pointed in the right direction behaviourally. (Of course, you may not be quite the right model there!) Would you consider taking on this project? It might be just up your alley. I figure that since Redthoreau is not going to go away, he may as well put all that energy into writing articles that don't have 61 quotations in them. How about it? — (Talk) "	0	0	0	0
e59f635c7b5358e4	on line dating hello..i hope you are well..im writing to let you know there is a man useing your pictures to con women on a dating site.. i was nearly coned by this person until my instincts told me to investigate and i did and i found your picture in the process.. these con men are useing alot of us army photos and scaming women all over the world..im from ireland..these men are claiming there in afghansitan serveing your country...its shocking on the real soliders over there that have no idea what is going on.. thank you pamela hanly ireland.....	0	0	0	0
e59fa79f5e9d69bd	" Solved at that time? Obviously not. You have a long history of abusive use of obscenities on Wikipedia(even ignoring the times your pal Binksternet erased them for you in an act of collusion to hide your malfeasance), and it will not be solved until you start obeying the rules. When I have a problem with your behavior I will decide how to address it. If you are so eager to be reported to an admin then do it yourself. I will continue to post here whenever I see you using obscenities and abuse, and any other time it is justified by your behavior. I really don't care if you consider it 'a harassment' that you're not given carte blanche to use obscenities and abuse on this forum. There are rules here, and you've obviously been here long enough to understand them. Even your pal has warned you about this, repeatedly, so you have no excuse. As for your threat to report it, try reading the post above yours slowly and carefully. If you still have trouble seeing where I said,""If you think you have the right to use abuse and obscenities against other editors, and that no one has the right to point out your blatant disregard of Wikipedia rules, then file a complaint about my actions in an appropriate venue. Then we'll see who is in the right here."" Then I'll tell you again: If you think you have the right to use abuse and obscenities against other editors, and that no one has the right to point out your blatant disregard of Wikipedia rules, then file a complaint about my actions in an appropriate venue. Then we'll see who's in the right here. "	0	0	0	0
e59fb95235dba27d	no fucking shit, dick head.	1	0	1	1
e5a1262fbfffef59	Merge from Bert Bell This does not really affect this article except it adds history with citations. If history of how and when the blue laws were deprecated are not desired, then please say so. 66.234.33.8	0	0	0	0
e5a181bc006a88b4	" Normally when a person tries to prove a point they provide something that backs up there point. I think you should reread that entire article. I could copy and paste the entire article because it backs up everything I said but that would take up too much space. ""I'll probably get murdered for telling you this, but even without donning an oxygen mask, a fit young person who doesn't smoke would probably not suffer unconsciousness during the brief period it takes for the aircraft to get down to below about 20,000ft. Anyone who did suffer unconsciousness would be unlikely to have brain damage, because they would still have been breathing air, even if at a pressure that did not sustain their brain at a fully functioning level, and the unconsciousness would have been so brief.Just get used to the reality. Go-arounds and sudden decompressions are seriously frightening, but hardly ever dangerous. The only people who love them are journalists."" 76.19.222.40 "	0	0	0	0
e5a7eeff4e1cd966	It's mentioned in the Hopalong Cassidy article because that type of info. is more pertinent to the character than the actor who played him, this being a bio. 82.8.252.13	0	0	0	0
e5aaeb88170965cf	Where is that documented? It's certainly not in the manual of style itself, which clearly states that it's not prescriptive and defers to the article's editors. (Quoted a bit above.) I also don't see anything that introduces this precedent for the editors of subsections of the Manual to become a standing arbitration committee for every individual article (a supposition that clearly would not scale to the scope of Wikipedia); in fact, I suspect that's why we've gone to the trouble of setting up an actual arbitration process.	0	0	0	0
e5ab03b811026c3b	"::::*(1) The whole section of the princely states is probably too detailed, but as it stands it is written in a very pro-Indian fashion.When India takes control of a state, it is a ""Military occupation"", even a ""Police action"". Pakistan however threatens with ""Military invasion"". (2)The whole section about India-Pakistan wars is grossly anti-Pakistan POV.(they are on this page, so am not giving the diff) "	0	0	0	0
e5abe51e0840e28f	THATS WHAT YOU DID BEFORE SHE WROTE A WORD ON THIS DEBATE. YOU REMOVED MY TEXTS 9 TIMES NOW, AND I REINSERT THEM AS MANY TIME. CEREAL KILLER IS INFORMED OF THIS AND IS FOLLOWING IT. ALL EVIDENCES AGAINST YOU ARE BEING COLLECTED ON THE INTERNET, AT THIS HOUR, WITH THE AIM TO ARREST YOU AT YOUR APPARTMENT FOR INFAMIE DISCRIMINATIONS MANIPULATION AND CENSORSHIP OF OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS, ATTACKS TO PERSONS PRIVATE LIFE, COMPUTER HACKING, AND AGGRAVATING FORDGERY OF EVIDENCES. I HAVE BUILD AN INTERNATIONAL NETWORK AGAINST YOU OF ALL THE PEOPLE WICH WORDS YOU ONCE ABUSED OF, AND BELIEVE ME THEY DIDN'T LIKE IT AND THEY ARE NOT GOING TO LET IT PASS. SOPHIE.	0	0	0	0
e5ae6c359b07e273	A few more questions Hello again! I have a few more music history questions. Since the Baroque period is said to have begun in 1600, were there musicians composing in the Baroque style before Monteverdi? And can Wilhelm Friedemann Bach, son of Johann Sebastian Bach, be considered a composer of the Classical style and period as well as the Baroque?	0	0	0	0
e5b09ca1d6174456	I got into the solution, and I think I hear my Mom calling me. Enjoy.	0	0	0	0
e5b2945388b75760	You are a Problem your probably some freshman hs student who kissed major ass just to become an administrator and use it to fuck with other people.	1	0	1	1
e5b4a71b3d138f38	Heleen Mees (born Heleen Nijkamp, 1968, Hengelo)[1] is a Dutch opinion writer, economist and lawyer. She has been credited as being a third wave feminist.[3] Contents [hide] TABTAB1 Biography TABTAB2 Publications TABTAB3 References TABTAB4 External links Biography Mees graduated in Economy and Law at University of Groningen. From 1992 to 1998, Mees worked for the Dutch Treasury in The Hague. From 1998 to 2000 Mees worked as a national expert for the European Commission in Brussels.[5] In 2000 she emigrated to the USA, where she changed her surname to Mees.[6] Mees lives in Brooklyn, New York.[2] Mees' breakthrough as an opinion writer in the Netherlands came in 2006 when she wrote The time is long overdue that women should go to work.[8] That same year, she co-founded Women on Top, an organization that until 2011 advocated more women in top jobs.[9] From 2006 to 2010 Mees wrote a bi-weekly column in NRC Handelsblad, and from 2012 to 2013 for Het Financieele Dagblad. Her work has been published in the Financial Times, Foreign Policy and other international newspapers. Currently she is a columnist for Project Syndicate[11] and the German magazine Capital. Mees is the author of three books. In August 2012, Mees completed a doctoral thesis at the Erasmus School of Economics, focusing on the effect of China's economy on the emergence of the 2008 global financial crisis.[13] While completing her research, she worked as an Adjunct Assistant Professor at Tilburg University.[14] From September 2012 until July 2013, Mees was employed as an Adjunct Associate Professor of Public Administration at New York University's Robert F. Wagner Graduate School of Public Service.[15] In July 2013, Mees was arrested in New York on charges of stalking her former lover, the chief economist of Citigroup, Willem Buiter.[16] In March 2014, the court decided that the case against Mees was to be dismissed in one year provided that she complies with two conditions.[17]	0	0	0	0
e5b4e04a0c715a22	urgent request may you take a step against this behavior? Those IP's edits were not by me but that guy cited my user name in edit summary without justifiable reason! May I defend myself against personal attacks in this particular instance? RegardsDaneto	0	0	0	0
e5b58686140c8631	Atabek again when you call Kasravi a pan-Iranian nationalists and not acceptable, then I can call Tapper an anthropologist which he is. If Kasravi is quoted by scholars such as Minorsky, Frye, Savory then his historical works are obviously acceptable. Also note this: [] Articles should rely on reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. Sources should be appropriate to the claims made: exceptional claims require stronger sources. See Wikipedia:Verifiability#Sources.. Note that is why I quote from Savory a Safavid historian and say that he is stronger source than Tapper who is an anthropologist. And furthermore I asked for direct proof with regards to your statement. Actually you quote says: Esmail I proclaimed himself Shah of Azerbaijan. Now I ask where? And then you bring me a quote from Tapper who is an anthropologist. Then I of course say that Savory who is a Safavid historian with much more qualifications does not claim Esmail I made such a proclamation. It is true that he controlled Gilan also (but perhaps not all of it).. As per Iran , it is mentioned as the country of Safavids by many sources. Including Sultan Selim I when he attacked Iran. تا ز استانبول لشکر سوی ایران تاختم تاج صوفی غرقه خون و ملامت ساختم. Thus we have a direct source referring to the country of Esmail I as Iran . And I do not need to bring direct reference like this because Safavid historians are strong enough source to quote. Note I repeat from the source. Although initially ruler of Azerbaijan only, by the year 916/1510 Esma@¿^l was master of the whole of Persia, having crushed the residual forces of the Aq Qoyunlu and driven the Uzbeks out of the northeastern frontier province of Khorasan.. seems correct but either way it is from strong source. But until we have proof of proclamation from Esmail I himself I am the Shah of Azerbaijan, then claiming Esmail I proclaimed himself shah of Azerbaijan is not valid. He proclaimed himself Shah in Azerbaijan is different though as he was crowned in Tarbiz. And yes he did own part of Gilan as well, and this angle can be argued from Encyclopedia Islam quote which I have brought above already. So basically I am asking you for the Minorsky quote you mentioned but quoting from an anthropologist when it contradicts Safavid historians or when Safavid historians are stronger source in my opinion is not valid. As per Arbcomm, there are admins I can report personal attacks outside of there and thus I mentioned the warning. I have no interest for getting personal as you said either. So lets keep it professional. Thanks	0	0	0	0
e5b5ab6dd626b5d9	" I would agree with you if two situations were present: (1) this wasn't a small stream that is barely a more than 6-12"" deep for its entire run and (2) if there actually were information on hydrology available. Surprisingly, there is little, except for two NJDEP reports on the Papakating watershed that devote one sentence to ""phosophorus loading"". I do plan to expand the Papakating Creek article and think (a) there are more resources for such content and (b) there a larger exposition on course, watershed, hydrology, geology content would be more appropriate. Further, as MOS eschews short sectionsMOS:PARAGRAPHS says ""Short paragraphs and single sentences generally do not warrant their own subheading"", it would be inadvisable per the MOS layout guidelines vis-à-vis their application for GA evaluation to start creating short sections. I would venture to say the current combination of this information in one sentence, given the nature of the article and its subject, is entirely appropriate. "	0	0	0	0
e5b61820eba230d3	interesting, isn't it? I wonder why it was written in the first place?	0	0	0	0
e5b860e7e25edd8a	"::::Thanks for restoring the article indeed. You have hoewever ommited the history section which by ignoring this section it does not enable us to work on it and improve quality of the asection and remove any doubts of copyvio. I remember vaguely the history section being the largest of all and the article is seriously truncated of useful and important information as it stands. Cheers, and the Mysterons "	0	0	0	0
e5bb44d91c506519	" That Uyghurjin article appeared to be a content fork anyway. What was covered in that article can be covered at the Mongolian script article. If the redirect becomes reverted again, you could always start an AfD discussion or something. T•C•E "	0	0	0	0
e5bb6a3f824d2411	, 10 August 2010 (UTC) Agreed. It's worth mentioning in the infobox. 23:33	0	0	0	0
e5bf6f3c8f549a85	, may their bones be crushed	0	0	0	0
e5bf82f66be875db	I agree but do you also warn the others that I am interacting with for the same reasons or are you just attacking me?	0	0	0	0
e5bf95778059541b	Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!	0	0	0	0
e5c0888baeb39736	" Edit request The image being used to illustrate him is a Fair use poster, per policy it should be a free image please and Fair use images should be avoided in infoboxes, remove this. - "	0	0	0	0
e5c16dd7e268964d	Emure Emure is a city in Nigeria, it is in the Ekiti State, it is not the Ekiti State so stop changing it to the Ekiti State.	0	0	0	0
e5c3a3321ef1ab5f	I'm sure it was worth every penny... ♠Dil	0	0	0	0
e5c47737564ebe28	Please stop it with the time cube red herring. Gene Ray has not been praised by theoretic physicists as having an interesting point of view with respect to spacetime. Can you spot the difference?	0	0	0	0
e5c4854b43781005	Joanna Yeates It's great news, but there could be a problem. Another editor has expressed their concern to me via email about the number of Daily Mail references used in the article. They're worried it could cause a storm when the article appears on the front page. I've said that I'll attempt to change them for better ones, but it may not be possible to replace them all. I wondered if you might be able to help with this, and perhaps ask one or two others to look for stuff. Sources we need are from publications like BBC News, The Guardian, The Independent, The Telegraph and Sky News. Thanks,	0	0	0	0
e5c518c821550c86	lasers. What an asshat	1	0	1	0
e5c529d827a0ed9e	Please direct all comments regarding this article here on the project talk page	0	0	0	0
e5c61b91472043eb	I will revert what I said but delete this article, List of Verizon FiOS channels first to be fair. - \| Talk	0	0	0	0
e5c6f5e8ccd6bf0f	" Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): Geez, I feel for you brother. Damn, that Cialis shit is off the hook. Request handled by: 75.100.83.239 "	0	0	1	0
e5c8c13b61e9ac4d	"""n any case, casting aspersions like this is unhelpful."" "	0	0	0	0
e5cbea4a8676beda	In fact, the edits that I made today were specifically requested by User:Awickert who asked me to provide diffs of Wikifan12345's personal attacks. I was simply responding to his request. If you are unhappy with the material I added to that page then remove it. It makes no difference to me.	0	0	0	0
e5ce7d3d7c75a14a	" Ed Paris? Does being ""Doctor of Medicine and first cousin of singer and actress Dinah Shore"" warrant including Ed Paris among the notable alumni in this article? (talk) "	0	0	0	0
e5cf07ee0dab23d8	im gonna shit in your sandbox in a minute.	1	0	1	0
e5d3de2dbf825a5b	Your Request for Rollback Hi! I am not an Administrator, but I was allowed to close your Request for Rollback as not done, as 2 sysops told you this week to stay away from rollback and semi-automated tools for a while. Please do not be discouraged, as getting rollback is really not a big deal. I have rollback and reviewer rights here, and other than a few extra buttons, it's really nothing. If you really want to get rollback despite this, than it is encouraged that you learn more about how to fight vandalism on Wikipedia. I recommend enrolling in the CVUA. No, we cannot promise that you will get rollback after completion, but if you are really interested in fighting vandalism here, we can help you out. Regards, .	0	0	0	0
e5d6d1a9456e14c1	" You wrote: ""I do see that someone can be baited until they finally lose their cool. This is why every situation needs a holistic and robust examination. However, there are some editors who use vulgarity a natural course."" That is frankly bizarre, given that the root of this conflict is this discussion, which went on for over three weeks without any vulgarity, with Bali ultimate present. Then Bali ultimate responded to a provocation by Debresser using vulgarity in a relatively mild way, and Debresser ran to ANI to get him blocked. But with your ""holistic and robust examination"" you came to the conclusion that this block is a cause worth fighting for? That's simply bizarre. Adler "	0	0	0	0
e5d862427891df8d	between his lies and the truth	0	0	0	0
e5d8d09d177ed7ab	" Well AndyTheGrump, I have a ""dog in this fight"". You are expressing the very heart of my arguement with your inflamatory rhetoric and personal attacks, rather than with reason. "	0	0	0	0
e5d93b89254b146d	Precisely. This is the reasonable argument. Thank you for stating it honestly instead of trying to go the legalese route like McCarthy up there.	0	0	0	0
e5da36931d2995aa	{{unblock-auto\|...}fuck you...you piece of shit suck my dick...48 is that all u can do....... my boys are coming later so suck my fat dick}	1	1	1	1
e5da602602d84d7c	Is the list hurting anything or anybody for being there, and how do you define a list as being trivial. It's not hard to source all of the videos that YouTube banned from the charts after accusations of spamming, they can still be found on the website and if someone want to add a missing video they just found they can do so, just remembering to source it, and if someone want to check if the views listed are accurate, just click the link and find out, and either change and/or update it. Look, I really don't want to start an edit war here, you must be afraid of a little change, to article that may need this list.	0	0	0	0
e5dd00f7b0b6bef1	tha's right perfectly civil...	0	0	0	0
e5dde3f52fa8e865	" WP:BYPASS your cache and try again. (You could also look up how I implemented this change and copy the parameter specification by hand.) I really ought to start working on the replacement, though... but not now. And may I say, your signature has awful contrast. Please fix it. "	0	0	0	0
e5de902bf26e1893	You twit The vandalism with which you charge me was an edit to MY contribution, which you might see if you got your head out of your ass for a breath of fresh air.	1	0	1	0
e5df197361b193b3	"change my perception toward your edit. Freaking is so civil language? I don't think so. You ERASED the valid information regarding the criminal's original name. Non-English speakers adapt alphabet spellings from country to country if they translate or transliterate their native language into English. If the kanji are not given on the article, how do readers know which Japanese are ""the criminals"" That's why I made the VALID revert you edit. Besides, what is 'instrumentalized'? I can't understand what you're saying. ""Freakin'"" is either used instead of ""very"", or when you are upset about something. It is not a bad word. For example: ""I'm so freakin' tired"" (== ""very"") or ""My girlfriend talks too much on the freakin' telephone"" (==upset). No, I didn't ""erase"" the ""valid"" information regarding the name. I forgot to re-add them after taking out the inappropriate interwikis (see also Wikipedia:Manual of Style (Japan-related articles)#Linking to Japanese Wikipedia) Anyway, so what? You could have just re-added it it yourself. Which would have been polite and saved everyone a lot of time. And, reverts are for vandalism etc (see WP:REVERT policy), not for reverting edits just because you don't like it. So, not valid. Secondly, I did re-add it myself. But you reverted anyway. No excuse because you did not read! So, again, not valid. ""Instrumentalize"" means to (mis)use something. For example, the way newspapers used a war story for propaganda effect. They ""instrumentalize"" horrors of war to show how ""great"" their soldiers are. Do you understand what I mean? Hmm.. This is so wasting my time to hear your unreasonable complaint. So you keep denying to acknowledge your mistake as erasing the info first. If you had been cautious about how people judge what is valid per edit history, you can't accuse me of reverting it without any reason. That is it. You can re-add your wordings without erasing the critical info. My ""unreasonable"" complaint? What is my complaint? That you didn't read? That you violated every point in WP:REVERT#Do not twice? No, I am not denying having made the mistake in the first place. I have already said this three times. But you should have fixed it yourself! Improve articles! Don't destroy the work of others. And do not assume that other people are being destructive. I should not have to be ""cautious about how people judge what is valid per edit history."" I should not be assuming that people are poor judges, because that would be bad faith in others. I should be able to expect that people will think and read and work together to make Wikipedia a good place and a good resource. I should not expect bad things. I should not expect editors to revert. Reverts are evil! They destroy goodwill. If you have goodwill, then you should now fix the article yourself. Or at least say sorry! NOR Request for arbitration Because of your participation in discussions relating to the ""PSTS"" model in the No original research article, I am notifying you that a request for arbitration has been opened here. I invite you to provide a statement encouraging the Arbcom to review this matter, so that we can settle it once and for all. NOR plea Fullstop, please stop snark-baiting Jossi. I've very much appreciated what you had to say in the discussion, but the credibility of your words are diminished with the silliness. I completely understand how frustrating it can be in something like this and no this isn't my business but as a relative newcomer to this discussion the snark b/w you & Jossi seems really pointless. I don't mean to cause offense and, again, I've thought you made uncommon good sense with your substantive points. So I'd like it if we could maintain the high ground on those .... No, you cause no offense at all. ) Point noted. But I will continue (though with a more judicious choice of words) to point out any attempts to change the subject. Its a symptom of denial, which is in turn a principle cause for the ring-a-roses. 18:00, 17 December 2007 (UTC	0	0	0	0
e5e094baaaf4a3e4	" Given the issues raised in the previous RS/N, I would suggest that any further discussion of this issue be raised at an RfC, because I am pretty sure that the patience of the RS/N board has been exhausted by now. This would allow you to frame your arguments in a far more neutral venue and one that has many more eyes on it than RS/N. Black Kite"	0	0	0	0
e5e1624bebfbf284	" Eddie Griffin (basketball) Why did you move Eddie Griffin (basketball) to Eddie Griffin (basketball player)? The abided standard for disambiguation for basketball players is ""(basketball)"", not ""(basketball player)"" - check to see if you're right and I'm wrong. Thanks "	0	0	0	0
e5e170e08b977972	someone can tell me what is the difference between anglo-concertina and bandonion. both are bisonoric...	0	0	0	0
e5e2c8c1d4b658a6	" Just to clarify the point of discussion, for people watching. CruftCutter changed the lead from William Albert ""Bill"" Dembski (born July 18 1960) is an American mathematician, philosopher, theologian, proponent of intelligent design, author and keeper of the intelligent design blog Uncommon Descent to William Albert ""Bill"" Dembski (born July 18 1960) is an American mathematician, philosopher, theologian, author and keeper of the intelligent design blog Uncommon Descent. I've proposed William Albert ""Bill"" Dembski (born July 18, 1960) is an American proponent of intelligent design, author and keeper of the intelligent design blog Uncommon Descent, with degrees in mathematics and theology and William Albert ""Bill"" Dembski (born July 18, 1960) is an American proponent of intelligent design, philosopher, theologian, author and keeper of the intelligent design blog Uncommon Descent, with degrees in mathematics and theology. I object mildly to describing Dembski as a mathematician, and strongly feel that the lead must start with proponent of intelligent design, because that is the only reason anyone has ever heard of him. "	0	0	0	0
e5e4df5514b0e519	The article here isn't too big, I would suggest just adding a section here and redirecting the red links to this article. If things get too large, we can always split.	0	0	0	0
e5e6aa1da9d1a434	" Removed weasel worded cruft Removed section starting with ""some medical..."" it is both weasel worded and inaccurate in regards to the content of the article."	0	0	0	0
e5e6b2276ead9df4	" He gave me a ""last warning"", and then only 4 minutes later, said I violated the warning...I hadn't even seen it yet!"	0	0	0	0
e5e8341c83c4f8ea	Mahan I’ve been looking to clean up anything in the article that I can before nominating it. One of tings yet to done is the cropping of the last image. You may recall you were working with others to have it digitized. Would you be able to help me sort this out? Thank you.	0	0	0	0
e5e8bec7b3b2fd6a	" Hi, ! Posting at the Teahouse is a good move, I hope you get some useful advice there. I've posted there and at Talk:Ella Orr Campbell to explain what the nature of the problem is. I'm afraid that, despite what you say, you have in fact infringed copyright. Four things: Please make sure it doesn't happen again; everything you write in Wikipedia must (with a very few specific exceptions) be entirely in your own words If you want to start on a rewrite of Ella Orr Campbell please feel free to do so – click the third of the three ""Show"" tags at middle right on the copyvio template covering the page to be taken to a new temporary page; please do not copy over any text to the new page unless you are 100% certain that you wrote it entirely yourself (copying the problem to the new page does not help to fix the problem!) If you think there might be other articles where the same has happened (i.e., you have incorporated text from other places on the internet believing that to be acceptable), please identify them here; I am happy to help with cleaning those up too Please don't be discouraged from editing. "	0	0	0	0
e5ea4e8c9d53d77a	==Wow i jsut did a test for this saying bill cosby was homosexual and it was instantly tooken off, good work(thumbs up)at least someone cares about this site	0	0	0	0
e5edcd3c83191f9e	" That is ridiculous. The post that I restored said: ""Viriditas appears to be a bit confused about the difference between original research and a pertinent observation regarding some apparent vandalism of the main article. WP:OR does not require us to leave our brains at the door."" See []. It was in reply the post of User:Viriditas, which uses almost identical language, saying: ""I have no opinion either way, but your comments above and your self-publishing of a classified list of vital sites from a leaked WikiLeaks cable, tells me that you are a bit confused about original research and how we write articles from the secondary sources."" See []. I fail to see how any of this is anywhere near deserving of an immediate 2-week block, without notice or warning or reason. What on Earth is going on? "	0	0	0	0
e5eea99ab86a64cd	Yes, you really do. Telling you directly what you're doing wrong isn't working, obviously. If you want to stop me contributing here just because I complain about the way you do, go ahead, I'm sure you'll make that stick in whatever passes for an appeal court here. Or maybe not. Might be fun to find out. Anyway, if it wasn't obvious already, I'm not minded to listen to any advice or suggestions you've got to offer. But if you've got any more to give me, it's your time to waste I guess.	0	0	0	0
e5f1454f8eb75b7f	" Advice I apologize for your recent difficulties, your block was clearly undeserved. Our governance here at Wikipedia is imperfect and too often administrators abuse the power we grant them. While we can’t prevent it we can work around it - in this case by creating a new identity to bypass your block - what we call a ""sockpuppet"" account. Officially it’s frowned upon but so long as it’s undetected a sockpuppet is just as functional as a regular account. In fact many current and former administrators are sockpuppet accounts. The instructions below provide an easy guide to creating your new account and avoiding detection. Instructions Log out of your Wikipedia account, clear your cookies (google ""how to clear all cookies"" for instructions) and close your browser Download a new browser: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer. This will be your dedicated Wikipedia browser Follow these instructions to permanently disable javascript in your new browser: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer And these to permanently disable java: All browsers Reset your IP address. With most ISPs the procedure is as follows: unplug your modem, wait 10 minutes, plug it back in. Use this website (http://www.whatsmyip.org/) to check your IP address before and after to verify it's changed. If it has, great, if not you may have to wait a few hours or a few days before repeating this procedure successfully Now you're ready to register your new Wikipedia account Tips Never log into your old account from the same network or with the same browser as your new account Don't choose an account name similar to your old account name; administrators will use that as an excuse to sanction you Don't edit your user page or your talk page straight away; it's a dead giveaway you’re not a new user. Remember, this user is “new” to Wikipedia Mess up a little - forget to sign or sign incorrectly, split someone's comment “accidentally” - everything to give the impression this is your first experience editing Wikipedia Avoid noticeboards and contentious articles until you’ve made a reasonable number of edits; sockpuppet or not experienced Wikipedians don't appreciate being held to community standards by new users All done. Happy editing and welcome back. I hope your new experience will be more pleasant. — John Whales, Founder and CEO of the World Wide Web This user's real life identity is verified by the following SHA-1 hash: 177.154.145.102 "	0	0	0	0
e5f64c4000f97250	God for an experienced Wikipedian you are an arrogant piece of shit. How about checking out the source to see if it is reliable. Bloody Hell.	1	0	0	0
e5f73db2595639e4	Why are you reverting all my revisions, I donated a lot to Wikipedia, I deserve to have some fun.	0	0	0	0
e5f849db5df79252	I honestly did not know what 88 stood for. And none of my edits are related to nazi-related topics, unless of course, you consider anything race-related to be so.	0	0	0	0
e5f886905f678d39	Ok i will add the section tomorrow. Keep up the good work, night.	0	0	0	0
e5f897739554b777	Regarding gamecruft/gameguide stuff Feel free to chip in: discussion link	0	0	0	0
e5fafebefd38d2cb	" Image copyright problem with Image:Halo08.jpg Thank you for uploading Image:Halo08.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. (Parrot) "	0	0	0	0
e5fb7cd6a223e73a	Millions of people in the muslim world consider PALESTINE to be occupied by the zionist entity. will we fairly represent that or just tell more LIES!	0	0	0	0
e5fd4ed96a5e941c	Tagged Image:Aconitethrill.jpg as a promotional photograph.	0	0	0	0
e5fd794b0c4255ed	so when does this block end. hganesan	0	0	0	0
e5fddf266ffb3796	Extremely strongly disaggree. It is called other appeerences for a reason.	0	0	0	0
e603b7daf5e71d0b	How come when I find unsourced entries and remove them, I get chastised? Yet you removed my unsourced entry and all is well? THC Loadee	0	0	0	0
e60404dcdab91daa	reorganisation of 10 August (French Revolution) Courtesy call: I have today moved the above article from 10th of August (French Revolution), as being a title more consistent with WP's acceptable date formats. In the same vein, I have created the following redirects: August 10, 1792 10 August 1792 I have also put up some of the existing redirects for deletion as follows: Journée of the 10th of August Journee of the 10th of August Insurrection of the 10th of August Revolution of the 10th of August	0	0	0	0
e604b6233d410fa0	Any notional improvement was purely accidental I can assure you. This is a pointless block. It doesn't address the reason for my incivility (not only was I eminently polite in the opening exhanges, I will be polite in future as soon as someone stops people like HiLo and the rest being deliberately obtuse for no other reason that to stall the debate and thus get their desired outcome through these despicable means), and it also doesn't teach ignorant pricks like Alex or Resolute or Thryduulf or the countless other luminaries on display in there that no, not everyone's opinion is equally valid, not when it so blatantly contradicts sources or reality, and is basically just 100% grade A-Bullshit straight out of the Insanity Farm they call a brain. Never mind ITN, does anyone ever check if any of these fucktards have ever gone one step further and, instead of just spouting this sort of crap at ITN, has any of them ever got one of their batshit opinions about topics like football into an actual article to present it as fact? Will we find out somewhere in Wikipedia what the blocker position is in association football for example? Is there an article somewhere that really says winning 13 EPL titles is seen as no big deal? Does Alex Ferguson's article really say that his retirement had no impact and was only of local significance? Really? Seriously? Dickheads. If that story fails to get posted, it will not be my fault, it will be primarily down to the ignorant pricks who would not know the consensus process if it was drawn out for them using their own crayons, and secondarily, down to people like you and ThaddeusB who just stood back and watched them piss all over what in reality should have been a very straightforward exchange of facts and evidence leading to a posting nearly 30 hours ago, back when this was actually major breaking news, rather than just ongoing news.	0	0	0	0
e6051f93abeaf26a	I got your point.Ya you are right about all those things.I understand you and have faith on you completely. Chopra article to FA....good idea but all India today sources are dead links ,peer review tells all.Well thanks for your help.....well I must say, you transformed that article completely to an amazing biographical piece of work.We will support you on FA.( )	0	0	0	0
e6052800b57b7fd8	" Thank you very much, ! and Best of Everything to You and Yours! – '''' "	0	0	0	0
e60562b062782b90	Reverts And why did you do this revert ? And going around and blindly reverting other of my edits? Are you a stalker or somethign?	0	0	0	0
e607d1defe236a9c	Template Popes You have changed the title in the Template:Popes from Popes of the Catholic Church to Popes of the Roman Catholic Church. Catholic Church redirects to Roman Catholic Church; so what's the point of your change? Catholic Church is simplier than Roman Catholic Church; so what change it?	0	0	0	0
e60a1494438dd879	" Rant Nice Rant. Check mine out. I got rants on Gamespot, YouTube and Wikipedia. Yeah, I see things differently then most people. You've got a Thank you card! Open your card! Dear Fredil, thank you so much for your beautiful words, your kidness and your trust in me. My Request for Adminship is finally over, and the support and appreciation that the community has gifted me will stick in my mind as long as I live. I have no way to properly express how grateful I am to you for all you've done for me, and all I can tell you is, I'll try not to disappoint you nor anyone else with my use of the buttons... and if I mess up, make sure to come here and give me a good yell! ) Seriously, tho, if you ever need my help, either for admin-related stuff or in any other way, you'll always be welcome to message me, and I promise I'll try my very best. Dear Fredil, I know that your faith in Wikipedia is shaken right now; and tho I didn't have the pleasure of talking to ILP myself, I also feel that his departure is saddening indeed. In moments like this, when everything looks dark, is when friendship, true friendship, shines with a brighter light. ILP understood the value of that friendship better than most people do. I can't think of a better way to keep his thoughts a living part of our project, than offering myself as your own friend; and know that I don't take such an offer lightly. Valuable and great peple like you are rare to find, dear Fredil. There is much beauty in this place, and wonderful people. Don't let the darkness take over you - I'll do my very best to help you keep the light shining bright, I promise ) With a big hug, your friend, ♥ tell me Inspiring words. I should listen to them too. \| Speaking for myself only, it's a bit hard to listen to order when there's so much chaos. — (talk) / Agreed. 's RfA Hi Fredil Yupigo!Thank you for taking part in my RfA! Unfortunately, it ended with a final result of (62/23/7), and with only 73% support, no consensus was achieved. Nevertheless, I thank you for your support and I'll be looking for it in my next RfA! ) .H Your sig Hi, I hope you're enjoying your holiday! A note for when you get back: I noticed that you use a template as a signature. Please don't do that, as it's a drain on the servers. You can read the details about that here and elsewhere, there have been some discussions about this in the past. Thanks! [[User	0	0	0	0
e60dc04e589fa266	Template:Infobox road//shield US-Alt – Template:Infobox road//shield US Alt – Template:Infobox road//abbrev US-Alt – Template:Infobox road//abbrev US Alt – Template:Infobox road//link US-Alt – Template:Infobox road//link US Alt – Template:Infobox road//shield US-Bus – Template:Infobox road//shield US Bus – Template:Infobox road//abbrev US-Bus – Template:Infobox road//abbrev US Bus – Template:Infobox road//link US-Bus – Template:Infobox road//link US Bus – Template:Infobox road//shield US-Byp – Template:Infobox road//shield US Byp – Template:Infobox road//abbrev US-Byp – Template:Infobox road//abbrev US Byp – Template:Infobox road//link US-Byp – Template:Infobox road//link US Byp – Template:Infobox road//shield US-Truck – Template:Infobox road//shield US Truck – Template:Infobox road//abbrev US-Truck – Template:Infobox road//abbrev US Truck – Template:Infobox road//link US-Truck – Template:Infobox road//link US Truck – Template:Infobox road//shield US-Spur – Template:Infobox road//shield US Spur – Template:Infobox road//abbrev US-Spur – Template:Infobox road//abbrev US Spur – Template:Infobox road//link US-Spur – Template:Infobox road//link US Spur –	0	0	0	0
e60dd7062d1816d3	WikiNation is Dead You have lost your position. Or have you.....	0	0	0	0
e60dedc37b038fcc	Actually, it is a very good reason. It means that that guideline is nonsense. And you shouldn't protect pages that you are having a dispute in .	0	0	0	0
e60e699acff8d9bc	was taken from Britannica and Columbia Encyclopedia, and the links to the references were provided. You can check White Huns article which	0	0	0	0
e610dcce30e70d38	Wow such a drama queen. Why don't you grow a pair and learn to write properly?	0	0	0	0
e61170fb5c473202	Oh, and just to say: THANK YOU eversomuch for banninating that odious user. Jamesinc14 honks me off to no end. I'm grateful.	0	0	0	0
e6122c732af8b380	"Oh well if an admin says so. "	0	0	0	0
e6132dcce028ee89	" Michael Bay To Produce Gideon's sword? ""Michael Bay To Produce Gideon's sword!"". "	0	0	0	0
e6146f5fb2897913	i dont think i should be blocked be cause yall r illiterate yankees (bunch of idiots)	1	0	0	1
e614b37491ba207b	It's OK, I've just seen it. Fatuorum	0	0	0	0
e6163685c30ca8ce	" My Reply Rjecina, calm down. Please, read my postings carefully, I have never said that Vlahs did not exist. Your comments are ludacris and off topic. Zenanarh, thanks for the reply. I have read the link that you have posted about the term vlah. The website is called ""G-d, Bosnia and Bosniaks"", so i took all of the information describing Serbs with a grain of salt. I did enjoy reading the article, it definietly had a lot of information that could be incorporated into the article (if there is another source backing it up). I have two major concerns. Firstly, the article concentrates on the Bosnian side Vlah's and not the Croatian side (the article is Serbs of Croatia not Serbs of Bosnia). Secondly, the article concludes with ""...when one hears... Russian politicians talking about the need to defend their ancient Slav brothers in Bosnia, that the one component of the Bosnian population which has a large and identifiable element of non-Slav ancestry is the Bosnian Serbs."" I do not know how accurate the article is because of the last statement (in my opinion it leans towards the Muslim side). Also, inside the article there is a mention that Serbian scholars identify the term Vlah with shepards. Irrespectively, I think the article link was a great contribution. After reading the article, the Bosnian Vlah's were ""settled"" by Ottomans. Conversely, Croatian side Vlah's ""escaped"" Ottoman prosecution. This was a mistake in ""Serbs of Croatia"" article, which stated that Vlah's were settled by the Ottomans in Croatia."	0	0	0	0
e61654d5b5f28ac2	wqhy the hell did oyu delete the pocs article	1	0	0	0
e61bbc525efce38a	I think that you have a point here...but I can't think about at the moment. Thanks anyway for dropping me a note.	0	0	0	0
e61cf2225410c6b7	‎Like?: Insteaf od partakin gin discussion since I last posted on your waqll (and I havent edited the part in question since then), the user has now insisted on refuting discussion based consensus and goes to ANI. What are we supposed to do if discussion are not followed and this is legitimised/? GHow do I even try to generate a dsicssuion if it is dismissed in favour of such wars without consensus?( ).	0	0	0	0
e61f6110bfca0826	Judging by , the DNB article may conflate two people of the same name. Someone look at the ODNB?	0	0	0	0

e59353d3a3427eef

I think the David Letterman argument is fine, however one must ask whether to highlight particular disputes at all is relevant as the entire document highlights nothing but contentious issues...however I beileve Bill Oreilly likes to be in contentious issues. As to the specifics of why I erased it....you provided no dispute quotations taken from Bill Oreilly. He had some zingers that nailed Dave hard what was chosen was the weakest of his points vs the strongest of lettermans... Rewrite it. Oreilly's comment about not calling people who blow up innocent women and children on his show as a devestating blow to Letterman and a clear clever and concise statement.

0

e59569f3d89469d5

The main reason why I haven't formally retired from Wikipedia (if though I want to) is I don't want to get the abusive vandal the satisfaction that's the main reason. Because life is to short to put up with this type of thing

0

e597b77c5083e484

We'll add something about it when someone presents a reliable source discussing it. __

0

e59a9565f7df164b

I did NOT attack you personally. I did NOT violate any policy. That is a figment of your imagination. I attacked the country of France. Now, back to the article. You keep telling me to focus on the article but neither you, or have explained why the rumour, which is the subject of this tread, should be on the Rumsfeld Wikipedia page. As far as I can tell I have asked both of you for your input on that topic at least two times each and I haven't got a respond to that topic yet. I have received is a lecture from explaining his personal opinion that I should refer to Kerry is a Loser and from about logical fallacy of my argument. But I haven't heard one comment from either one of you on the actual topic of discussion which is the rumour listed about about Rumsfeld. I will repeat. Remember you really shouldn't lecture someone about sticking to the facts at hand unless you yourself actually comment on the facts at hand, which you haven't done yet. Unless there is some evidence provided for the Rumsfeld rumour then it will NOT go into the article and if anyone puts it in the article then I will rip it out.- 17:33, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)

0

e59b37ac6a2e06e4

" Liberal POV ""The package includes provisions for lowering import tariffs and agricultural subsidies, making it easier for developing countries to compete with the developed world in global markets."" This sentence has a clear economic liberal viewpoint. Who can guarantee these countries will really be more competitive? There are some schools of thought that disagree on this notion; to cite a few: protectionism, developmentalism and economic nationalism. I changed the wording to make it clear that this is a POV, but this was reverted. Some feedback on it would be good. "

0

e59ba61bba910280

"An interesting observation, considering the repeated efforts to edit out (and block users to add it) references to the Boston College one-historic campus ""now covered in vast expanses of concrete."" "

0

e59d332b50e3f310

" Would you take on a project?? There are two users, currently both with a week-long block for edit warring over an article Che Guevara (photo), although the blocking admin is vacillating, suggesting an RFC which I know is useless. One of the editors, User:Redthoreau, I tangled with a while ago and ultimately ended up nominating the article in question for FAR, Wikipedia:Featured article review/Che Guevara/archive1. The other editor User:Damiens.rf I don't know, but his current complain is that 61 quotations in an article is too many. The blocking admin User talk:EdJohnston wants to handle the situation constructively but does not know how. I suggested to him that someone like you, an experienced editor might be willing to be a neutral editor between the two, focused on article quality. I suggested you (and perhaps also User talk:Geometry guy) to direct the warring editors to concentrate on article quality. My experience in the past with User:Redthoreau is that he does rather well when a ""father figure"" type takes an interest. Some of his obnoxiousness, I believe, is due to youthful aggression and ignorance. I think he would respond positively to someone whose goal was to produce a quality article. As he dominates all things Guevara, the only way to improve the Guevara articles on Wikipedia is to move Redthoreau over onto the side of the forces of good. Since the focus would just be this one article, and your job would be to render advice/judgement on article criteria, I think the job would not be unduly burdensome. Redthoreau had a past mentor-like relationship with User:Coppertwig and did very well when pointed in the right direction behaviourally. (Of course, you may not be quite the right model there!) Would you consider taking on this project? It might be just up your alley. I figure that since Redthoreau is not going to go away, he may as well put all that energy into writing articles that don't have 61 quotations in them. How about it? — (Talk) "

0

e59f635c7b5358e4

on line dating hello..i hope you are well..im writing to let you know there is a man useing your pictures to con women on a dating site.. i was nearly coned by this person until my instincts told me to investigate and i did and i found your picture in the process.. these con men are useing alot of us army photos and scaming women all over the world..im from ireland..these men are claiming there in afghansitan serveing your country...its shocking on the real soliders over there that have no idea what is going on.. thank you pamela hanly ireland.....

0

e59fa79f5e9d69bd

" Solved at that time? Obviously not. You have a long history of abusive use of obscenities on Wikipedia(even ignoring the times your pal Binksternet erased them for you in an act of collusion to hide your malfeasance), and it will not be solved until you start obeying the rules. When I have a problem with your behavior I will decide how to address it. If you are so eager to be reported to an admin then do it yourself. I will continue to post here whenever I see you using obscenities and abuse, and any other time it is justified by your behavior. I really don't care if you consider it 'a harassment' that you're not given carte blanche to use obscenities and abuse on this forum. There are rules here, and you've obviously been here long enough to understand them. Even your pal has warned you about this, repeatedly, so you have no excuse. As for your threat to report it, try reading the post above yours slowly and carefully. If you still have trouble seeing where I said,""If you think you have the right to use abuse and obscenities against other editors, and that no one has the right to point out your blatant disregard of Wikipedia rules, then file a complaint about my actions in an appropriate venue. Then we'll see who is in the right here."" Then I'll tell you again: If you think you have the right to use abuse and obscenities against other editors, and that no one has the right to point out your blatant disregard of Wikipedia rules, then file a complaint about my actions in an appropriate venue. Then we'll see who's in the right here. "

0

e59fb95235dba27d

no fucking shit, dick head.

1

0

1

0

1

0

e5a1262fbfffef59

Merge from Bert Bell This does not really affect this article except it adds history with citations. If history of how and when the blue laws were deprecated are not desired, then please say so. 66.234.33.8

0

e5a181bc006a88b4

" Normally when a person tries to prove a point they provide something that backs up there point. I think you should reread that entire article. I could copy and paste the entire article because it backs up everything I said but that would take up too much space. ""I'll probably get murdered for telling you this, but even without donning an oxygen mask, a fit young person who doesn't smoke would probably not suffer unconsciousness during the brief period it takes for the aircraft to get down to below about 20,000ft. Anyone who did suffer unconsciousness would be unlikely to have brain damage, because they would still have been breathing air, even if at a pressure that did not sustain their brain at a fully functioning level, and the unconsciousness would have been so brief.Just get used to the reality. Go-arounds and sudden decompressions are seriously frightening, but hardly ever dangerous. The only people who love them are journalists."" 76.19.222.40 "

0

e5a7eeff4e1cd966

It's mentioned in the Hopalong Cassidy article because that type of info. is more pertinent to the character than the actor who played him, this being a bio. 82.8.252.13

0

e5aaeb88170965cf

Where is that documented? It's certainly not in the manual of style itself, which clearly states that it's not prescriptive and defers to the article's editors. (Quoted a bit above.) I also don't see anything that introduces this precedent for the editors of subsections of the Manual to become a standing arbitration committee for every individual article (a supposition that clearly would not scale to the scope of Wikipedia); in fact, I suspect that's why we've gone to the trouble of setting up an actual arbitration process.

0

e5ab03b811026c3b

"::::*(1) The whole section of the princely states is probably too detailed, but as it stands it is written in a very pro-Indian fashion.When India takes control of a state, it is a ""Military occupation"", even a ""Police action"". Pakistan however threatens with ""Military invasion"". (2)The whole section about India-Pakistan wars is grossly anti-Pakistan POV.(they are on this page, so am not giving the diff) "

0

e5abe51e0840e28f

THATS WHAT YOU DID BEFORE SHE WROTE A WORD ON THIS DEBATE. YOU REMOVED MY TEXTS 9 TIMES NOW, AND I REINSERT THEM AS MANY TIME. CEREAL KILLER IS INFORMED OF THIS AND IS FOLLOWING IT. ALL EVIDENCES AGAINST YOU ARE BEING COLLECTED ON THE INTERNET, AT THIS HOUR, WITH THE AIM TO ARREST YOU AT YOUR APPARTMENT FOR INFAMIE DISCRIMINATIONS MANIPULATION AND CENSORSHIP OF OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS, ATTACKS TO PERSONS PRIVATE LIFE, COMPUTER HACKING, AND AGGRAVATING FORDGERY OF EVIDENCES. I HAVE BUILD AN INTERNATIONAL NETWORK AGAINST YOU OF ALL THE PEOPLE WICH WORDS YOU ONCE ABUSED OF, AND BELIEVE ME THEY DIDN'T LIKE IT AND THEY ARE NOT GOING TO LET IT PASS. SOPHIE.

0

e5ae6c359b07e273

A few more questions Hello again! I have a few more music history questions. Since the Baroque period is said to have begun in 1600, were there musicians composing in the Baroque style before Monteverdi? And can Wilhelm Friedemann Bach, son of Johann Sebastian Bach, be considered a composer of the Classical style and period as well as the Baroque?

0

e5b09ca1d6174456

I got into the solution, and I think I hear my Mom calling me. Enjoy.

0

e5b2945388b75760

You are a Problem your probably some freshman hs student who kissed major ass just to become an administrator and use it to fuck with other people.

1

0

1

0

1

0

e5b4a71b3d138f38

Heleen Mees (born Heleen Nijkamp, 1968, Hengelo)[1] is a Dutch opinion writer, economist and lawyer. She has been credited as being a third wave feminist.[3] Contents [hide] TABTAB1 Biography TABTAB2 Publications TABTAB3 References TABTAB4 External links Biography Mees graduated in Economy and Law at University of Groningen. From 1992 to 1998, Mees worked for the Dutch Treasury in The Hague. From 1998 to 2000 Mees worked as a national expert for the European Commission in Brussels.[5] In 2000 she emigrated to the USA, where she changed her surname to Mees.[6] Mees lives in Brooklyn, New York.[2] Mees' breakthrough as an opinion writer in the Netherlands came in 2006 when she wrote The time is long overdue that women should go to work.[8] That same year, she co-founded Women on Top, an organization that until 2011 advocated more women in top jobs.[9] From 2006 to 2010 Mees wrote a bi-weekly column in NRC Handelsblad, and from 2012 to 2013 for Het Financieele Dagblad. Her work has been published in the Financial Times, Foreign Policy and other international newspapers. Currently she is a columnist for Project Syndicate[11] and the German magazine Capital. Mees is the author of three books. In August 2012, Mees completed a doctoral thesis at the Erasmus School of Economics, focusing on the effect of China's economy on the emergence of the 2008 global financial crisis.[13] While completing her research, she worked as an Adjunct Assistant Professor at Tilburg University.[14] From September 2012 until July 2013, Mees was employed as an Adjunct Associate Professor of Public Administration at New York University's Robert F. Wagner Graduate School of Public Service.[15] In July 2013, Mees was arrested in New York on charges of stalking her former lover, the chief economist of Citigroup, Willem Buiter.[16] In March 2014, the court decided that the case against Mees was to be dismissed in one year provided that she complies with two conditions.[17]

0

e5b4e04a0c715a22

urgent request may you take a step against this behavior? Those IP's edits were not by me but that guy cited my user name in edit summary without justifiable reason! May I defend myself against personal attacks in this particular instance? RegardsDaneto

0

e5b58686140c8631

Atabek again when you call Kasravi a pan-Iranian nationalists and not acceptable, then I can call Tapper an anthropologist which he is. If Kasravi is quoted by scholars such as Minorsky, Frye, Savory then his historical works are obviously acceptable. Also note this: [] Articles should rely on reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. Sources should be appropriate to the claims made: exceptional claims require stronger sources. See Wikipedia:Verifiability#Sources.. Note that is why I quote from Savory a Safavid historian and say that he is stronger source than Tapper who is an anthropologist. And furthermore I asked for direct proof with regards to your statement. Actually you quote says: Esmail I proclaimed himself Shah of Azerbaijan. Now I ask where? And then you bring me a quote from Tapper who is an anthropologist. Then I of course say that Savory who is a Safavid historian with much more qualifications does not claim Esmail I made such a proclamation. It is true that he controlled Gilan also (but perhaps not all of it).. As per Iran , it is mentioned as the country of Safavids by many sources. Including Sultan Selim I when he attacked Iran. تا ز استانبول لشکر سوی ایران تاختم تاج صوفی غرقه خون و ملامت ساختم. Thus we have a direct source referring to the country of Esmail I as Iran . And I do not need to bring direct reference like this because Safavid historians are strong enough source to quote. Note I repeat from the source. Although initially ruler of Azerbaijan only, by the year 916/1510 Esma@¿^l was master of the whole of Persia, having crushed the residual forces of the Aq Qoyunlu and driven the Uzbeks out of the northeastern frontier province of Khorasan.. seems correct but either way it is from strong source. But until we have proof of proclamation from Esmail I himself I am the Shah of Azerbaijan, then claiming Esmail I proclaimed himself shah of Azerbaijan is not valid. He proclaimed himself Shah in Azerbaijan is different though as he was crowned in Tarbiz. And yes he did own part of Gilan as well, and this angle can be argued from Encyclopedia Islam quote which I have brought above already. So basically I am asking you for the Minorsky quote you mentioned but quoting from an anthropologist when it contradicts Safavid historians or when Safavid historians are stronger source in my opinion is not valid. As per Arbcomm, there are admins I can report personal attacks outside of there and thus I mentioned the warning. I have no interest for getting personal as you said either. So lets keep it professional. Thanks

0

e5b5ab6dd626b5d9

" I would agree with you if two situations were present: (1) this wasn't a small stream that is barely a more than 6-12"" deep for its entire run and (2) if there actually were information on hydrology available. Surprisingly, there is little, except for two NJDEP reports on the Papakating watershed that devote one sentence to ""phosophorus loading"". I do plan to expand the Papakating Creek article and think (a) there are more resources for such content and (b) there a larger exposition on course, watershed, hydrology, geology content would be more appropriate. Further, as MOS eschews short sectionsMOS:PARAGRAPHS says ""Short paragraphs and single sentences generally do not warrant their own subheading"", it would be inadvisable per the MOS layout guidelines vis-à-vis their application for GA evaluation to start creating short sections. I would venture to say the current combination of this information in one sentence, given the nature of the article and its subject, is entirely appropriate. "

0

e5b61820eba230d3

interesting, isn't it? I wonder why it was written in the first place?

0

e5b860e7e25edd8a

"::::Thanks for restoring the article indeed. You have hoewever ommited the history section which by ignoring this section it does not enable us to work on it and improve quality of the asection and remove any doubts of copyvio. I remember vaguely the history section being the largest of all and the article is seriously truncated of useful and important information as it stands. Cheers, and the Mysterons "

0

e5bb44d91c506519

" That Uyghurjin article appeared to be a content fork anyway. What was covered in that article can be covered at the Mongolian script article. If the redirect becomes reverted again, you could always start an AfD discussion or something. T•C•E "

0

e5bb6a3f824d2411

, 10 August 2010 (UTC) Agreed. It's worth mentioning in the infobox. 23:33

0

e5bf6f3c8f549a85

, may their bones be crushed

0

e5bf82f66be875db

I agree but do you also warn the others that I am interacting with for the same reasons or are you just attacking me?

0

e5bf95778059541b

Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

0

e5c0888baeb39736

" Edit request The image being used to illustrate him is a Fair use poster, per policy it should be a free image please and Fair use images should be avoided in infoboxes, remove this. - "

0

e5c16dd7e268964d

Emure Emure is a city in Nigeria, it is in the Ekiti State, it is not the Ekiti State so stop changing it to the Ekiti State.

0

e5c3a3321ef1ab5f

I'm sure it was worth every penny... ♠Dil

0

e5c47737564ebe28

Please stop it with the time cube red herring. Gene Ray has not been praised by theoretic physicists as having an interesting point of view with respect to spacetime. Can you spot the difference?

0

e5c4854b43781005

Joanna Yeates It's great news, but there could be a problem. Another editor has expressed their concern to me via email about the number of Daily Mail references used in the article. They're worried it could cause a storm when the article appears on the front page. I've said that I'll attempt to change them for better ones, but it may not be possible to replace them all. I wondered if you might be able to help with this, and perhaps ask one or two others to look for stuff. Sources we need are from publications like BBC News, The Guardian, The Independent, The Telegraph and Sky News. Thanks,

0

e5c518c821550c86

lasers. What an asshat

1

0

1

0

e5c529d827a0ed9e

Please direct all comments regarding this article here on the project talk page

0

e5c61b91472043eb

I will revert what I said but delete this article, List of Verizon FiOS channels first to be fair. - | Talk

0

e5c6f5e8ccd6bf0f

" Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): Geez, I feel for you brother. Damn, that Cialis shit is off the hook. Request handled by: 75.100.83.239 "

0

1

0

e5c8c13b61e9ac4d

"""n any case, casting aspersions like this is unhelpful."" "

0

e5cbea4a8676beda

In fact, the edits that I made today were specifically requested by User:Awickert who asked me to provide diffs of Wikifan12345's personal attacks. I was simply responding to his request. If you are unhappy with the material I added to that page then remove it. It makes no difference to me.

0

e5ce7d3d7c75a14a

" Ed Paris? Does being ""Doctor of Medicine and first cousin of singer and actress Dinah Shore"" warrant including Ed Paris among the notable alumni in this article? (talk) "

0

e5cf07ee0dab23d8

im gonna shit in your sandbox in a minute.

1

0

1

0

e5d3de2dbf825a5b

Your Request for Rollback Hi! I am not an Administrator, but I was allowed to close your Request for Rollback as not done, as 2 sysops told you this week to stay away from rollback and semi-automated tools for a while. Please do not be discouraged, as getting rollback is really not a big deal. I have rollback and reviewer rights here, and other than a few extra buttons, it's really nothing. If you really want to get rollback despite this, than it is encouraged that you learn more about how to fight vandalism on Wikipedia. I recommend enrolling in the CVUA. No, we cannot promise that you will get rollback after completion, but if you are really interested in fighting vandalism here, we can help you out. Regards, .

0

e5d6d1a9456e14c1

" You wrote: ""I do see that someone can be baited until they finally lose their cool. This is why every situation needs a holistic and robust examination. However, there are some editors who use vulgarity a natural course."" That is frankly bizarre, given that the root of this conflict is this discussion, which went on for over three weeks without any vulgarity, with Bali ultimate present. Then Bali ultimate responded to a provocation by Debresser using vulgarity in a relatively mild way, and Debresser ran to ANI to get him blocked. But with your ""holistic and robust examination"" you came to the conclusion that this block is a cause worth fighting for? That's simply bizarre. Adler "

0

e5d862427891df8d

between his lies and the truth

0

e5d8d09d177ed7ab

" Well AndyTheGrump, I have a ""dog in this fight"". You are expressing the very heart of my arguement with your inflamatory rhetoric and personal attacks, rather than with reason. "

0

e5d93b89254b146d

Precisely. This is the reasonable argument. Thank you for stating it honestly instead of trying to go the legalese route like McCarthy up there.

0

e5da36931d2995aa

{{unblock-auto|...}fuck you...you piece of shit suck my dick...48 is that all u can do....... my boys are coming later so suck my fat dick}

1

0

1

0

e5da602602d84d7c

Is the list hurting anything or anybody for being there, and how do you define a list as being trivial. It's not hard to source all of the videos that YouTube banned from the charts after accusations of spamming, they can still be found on the website and if someone want to add a missing video they just found they can do so, just remembering to source it, and if someone want to check if the views listed are accurate, just click the link and find out, and either change and/or update it. Look, I really don't want to start an edit war here, you must be afraid of a little change, to article that may need this list.

0

e5dd00f7b0b6bef1

tha's right perfectly civil...

0

e5dde3f52fa8e865

" WP:BYPASS your cache and try again. (You could also look up how I implemented this change and copy the parameter specification by hand.) I really ought to start working on the replacement, though... but not now. And may I say, your signature has awful contrast. Please fix it. "

0

e5de902bf26e1893

You twit The vandalism with which you charge me was an edit to MY contribution, which you might see if you got your head out of your ass for a breath of fresh air.

1

0

1

0

e5df197361b193b3

"change my perception toward your edit. Freaking is so civil language? I don't think so. You ERASED the valid information regarding the criminal's original name. Non-English speakers adapt alphabet spellings from country to country if they translate or transliterate their native language into English. If the kanji are not given on the article, how do readers know which Japanese are ""the criminals"" That's why I made the VALID revert you edit. Besides, what is 'instrumentalized'? I can't understand what you're saying. ""Freakin'"" is either used instead of ""very"", or when you are upset about something. It is not a bad word. For example: ""I'm so freakin' tired"" (== ""very"") or ""My girlfriend talks too much on the freakin' telephone"" (==upset). No, I didn't ""erase"" the ""valid"" information regarding the name. I forgot to re-add them after taking out the inappropriate interwikis (see also Wikipedia:Manual of Style (Japan-related articles)#Linking to Japanese Wikipedia) Anyway, so what? You could have just re-added it it yourself. Which would have been polite and saved everyone a lot of time. And, reverts are for vandalism etc (see WP:REVERT policy), not for reverting edits just because you don't like it. So, not valid. Secondly, I *did* re-add it myself. But you reverted anyway. No excuse because you did not read! So, again, not valid. ""Instrumentalize"" means to (mis)use something. For example, the way newspapers used a war story for propaganda effect. They ""instrumentalize"" horrors of war to show how ""great"" their soldiers are. Do you understand what I mean? Hmm.. This is so wasting my time to hear your unreasonable complaint. So you keep denying to acknowledge your mistake as erasing the info first. If you had been cautious about how people judge what is valid per edit history, you can't accuse me of reverting it without any reason. That is it. You can re-add your wordings without erasing the critical info. My ""unreasonable"" complaint? What is my complaint? That you didn't read? That you violated every point in WP:REVERT#Do not twice? No, I am not denying having made the mistake in the first place. I have already said this three times. But you should have fixed it yourself! Improve articles! Don't destroy the work of others. And do not assume that other people are being destructive. I should not have to be ""cautious about how people judge what is valid per edit history."" I should not be assuming that people are poor judges, because that would be bad faith in others. I should be able to *expect* that people will *think* and *read* and work together to make Wikipedia a good place and a good resource. I should not expect bad things. I should not expect editors to revert. Reverts are evil! They destroy goodwill. If you have goodwill, then you should now fix the article yourself. Or at least say sorry! NOR Request for arbitration Because of your participation in discussions relating to the ""PSTS"" model in the No original research article, I am notifying you that a request for arbitration has been opened here. I invite you to provide a statement encouraging the Arbcom to review this matter, so that we can settle it once and for all. NOR plea Fullstop, please stop snark-baiting Jossi. I've very much appreciated what you had to say in the discussion, but the credibility of your words are diminished with the silliness. I completely understand how frustrating it can be in something like this and no this isn't my business but as a relative newcomer to this discussion the snark b/w you & Jossi seems really pointless. I don't mean to cause offense and, again, I've thought you made uncommon good sense with your substantive points. So I'd like it if we could maintain the high ground on those .... No, you cause no offense at all. ) Point noted. But I will continue (though with a more judicious choice of words) to point out any attempts to change the subject. Its a symptom of denial, which is in turn a principle cause for the ring-a-roses. 18:00, 17 December 2007 (UTC

0

e5e094baaaf4a3e4

" Given the issues raised in the previous RS/N, I would suggest that any further discussion of this issue be raised at an RfC, because I am pretty sure that the patience of the RS/N board has been exhausted by now. This would allow you to frame your arguments in a far more neutral venue and one that has many more eyes on it than RS/N. Black Kite"

0

e5e1624bebfbf284

" Eddie Griffin (basketball) Why did you move Eddie Griffin (basketball) to Eddie Griffin (basketball player)? The abided standard for disambiguation for basketball players is ""(basketball)"", not ""(basketball player)"" - check to see if you're right and I'm wrong. Thanks "

0

e5e170e08b977972

someone can tell me what is the difference between anglo-concertina and bandonion. both are bisonoric...

0

e5e2c8c1d4b658a6

" Just to clarify the point of discussion, for people watching. CruftCutter changed the lead from William Albert ""Bill"" Dembski (born July 18 1960) is an American mathematician, philosopher, theologian, proponent of intelligent design, author and keeper of the intelligent design blog Uncommon Descent to William Albert ""Bill"" Dembski (born July 18 1960) is an American mathematician, philosopher, theologian, author and keeper of the intelligent design blog Uncommon Descent. I've proposed William Albert ""Bill"" Dembski (born July 18, 1960) is an American proponent of intelligent design, author and keeper of the intelligent design blog Uncommon Descent, with degrees in mathematics and theology and William Albert ""Bill"" Dembski (born July 18, 1960) is an American proponent of intelligent design, philosopher, theologian, author and keeper of the intelligent design blog Uncommon Descent, with degrees in mathematics and theology. I object mildly to describing Dembski as a mathematician, and strongly feel that the lead must start with proponent of intelligent design, because that is the only reason anyone has ever heard of him. "

0

e5e4df5514b0e519

The article here isn't too big, I would suggest just adding a section here and redirecting the red links to this article. If things get too large, we can always split.

0

e5e6aa1da9d1a434

" Removed weasel worded cruft Removed section starting with ""some medical..."" it is both weasel worded and inaccurate in regards to the content of the article."

0

e5e6b2276ead9df4

" He gave me a ""last warning"", and then only 4 minutes later, said I violated the warning...I hadn't even seen it yet!"

0

e5e8341c83c4f8ea

Mahan I’ve been looking to clean up anything in the article that I can before nominating it. One of tings yet to done is the cropping of the last image. You may recall you were working with others to have it digitized. Would you be able to help me sort this out? Thank you.

0

e5e8bec7b3b2fd6a

" Hi, ! Posting at the Teahouse is a good move, I hope you get some useful advice there. I've posted there and at Talk:Ella Orr Campbell to explain what the nature of the problem is. I'm afraid that, despite what you say, you have in fact infringed copyright. Four things: Please make sure it doesn't happen again; everything you write in Wikipedia must (with a very few specific exceptions) be entirely in your own words If you want to start on a rewrite of Ella Orr Campbell please feel free to do so – click the third of the three ""Show"" tags at middle right on the copyvio template covering the page to be taken to a new temporary page; please do not copy over any text to the new page unless you are 100% certain that you wrote it entirely yourself (copying the problem to the new page does not help to fix the problem!) If you think there might be other articles where the same has happened (i.e., you have incorporated text from other places on the internet believing that to be acceptable), please identify them here; I am happy to help with cleaning those up too Please don't be discouraged from editing. "

0

e5ea4e8c9d53d77a

==Wow i jsut did a test for this saying bill cosby was homosexual and it was instantly tooken off, good work(thumbs up)at least someone cares about this site

0

e5edcd3c83191f9e

" That is ridiculous. The post that I restored said: ""Viriditas appears to be a bit confused about the difference between original research and a pertinent observation regarding some apparent vandalism of the main article. WP:OR does not require us to leave our brains at the door."" See []. It was in reply the post of User:Viriditas, which uses almost identical language, saying: ""I have no opinion either way, but your comments above and your self-publishing of a classified list of vital sites from a leaked WikiLeaks cable, tells me that you are a bit confused about original research and how we write articles from the secondary sources."" See []. I fail to see how any of this is anywhere near deserving of an immediate 2-week block, without notice or warning or reason. What on Earth is going on? "

0

e5eea99ab86a64cd

Yes, you really do. Telling you directly what you're doing wrong isn't working, obviously. If you want to stop me contributing here just because I complain about the way you do, go ahead, I'm sure you'll make that stick in whatever passes for an appeal court here. Or maybe not. Might be fun to find out. Anyway, if it wasn't obvious already, I'm not minded to listen to any advice or suggestions you've got to offer. But if you've got any more to give me, it's your time to waste I guess.

0

e5f1454f8eb75b7f

" Advice I apologize for your recent difficulties, your block was clearly undeserved. Our governance here at Wikipedia is imperfect and too often administrators abuse the power we grant them. While we can’t prevent it we can work around it - in this case by creating a new identity to bypass your block - what we call a ""sockpuppet"" account. Officially it’s frowned upon but so long as it’s undetected a sockpuppet is just as functional as a regular account. In fact many current and former administrators are sockpuppet accounts. The instructions below provide an easy guide to creating your new account and avoiding detection. Instructions Log out of your Wikipedia account, clear your cookies (google ""how to clear all cookies"" for instructions) and close your browser Download a new browser: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer. This will be your dedicated Wikipedia browser Follow these instructions to permanently disable javascript in your new browser: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer And these to permanently disable java: All browsers Reset your IP address. With most ISPs the procedure is as follows: unplug your modem, wait 10 minutes, plug it back in. Use this website (http://www.whatsmyip.org/) to check your IP address before and after to verify it's changed. If it has, great, if not you may have to wait a few hours or a few days before repeating this procedure successfully Now you're ready to register your new Wikipedia account Tips Never log into your old account from the same network or with the same browser as your new account Don't choose an account name similar to your old account name; administrators will use that as an excuse to sanction you Don't edit your user page or your talk page straight away; it's a dead giveaway you’re not a new user. Remember, this user is “new” to Wikipedia Mess up a little - forget to sign or sign incorrectly, split someone's comment “accidentally” - everything to give the impression this is your first experience editing Wikipedia Avoid noticeboards and contentious articles until you’ve made a reasonable number of edits; sockpuppet or not experienced Wikipedians don't appreciate being held to community standards by new users All done. Happy editing and welcome back. I hope your new experience will be more pleasant. — John Whales, Founder and CEO of the World Wide Web This user's real life identity is verified by the following SHA-1 hash: 177.154.145.102 "

0

e5f64c4000f97250

God for an experienced Wikipedian you are an arrogant piece of shit. How about checking out the source to see if it is reliable. Bloody Hell.

1

0

e5f73db2595639e4

Why are you reverting all my revisions, I donated a lot to Wikipedia, I deserve to have some fun.

0

e5f849db5df79252

I honestly did not know what 88 stood for. And none of my edits are related to nazi-related topics, unless of course, you consider anything race-related to be so.

0

e5f886905f678d39

Ok i will add the section tomorrow. Keep up the good work, night.

0

e5f897739554b777

Regarding gamecruft/gameguide stuff Feel free to chip in: discussion link

0

e5fafebefd38d2cb

" Image copyright problem with Image:Halo08.jpg Thank you for uploading Image:Halo08.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. (Parrot) "

0

e5fb7cd6a223e73a

Millions of people in the muslim world consider PALESTINE to be occupied by the zionist entity. will we fairly represent that or just tell more LIES!

0

e5fd4ed96a5e941c

Tagged Image:Aconitethrill.jpg as a promotional photograph.

0

e5fd794b0c4255ed

so when does this block end. hganesan

0

e5fddf266ffb3796

Extremely strongly disaggree. It is called other appeerences for a reason.

0

e603b7daf5e71d0b

How come when I find unsourced entries and remove them, I get chastised? Yet you removed my unsourced entry and all is well? THC Loadee

0

e60404dcdab91daa

reorganisation of 10 August (French Revolution) Courtesy call: I have today moved the above article from 10th of August (French Revolution), as being a title more consistent with WP's acceptable date formats. In the same vein, I have created the following redirects: August 10, 1792 10 August 1792 I have also put up some of the existing redirects for deletion as follows: Journée of the 10th of August Journee of the 10th of August Insurrection of the 10th of August Revolution of the 10th of August

0

e604b6233d410fa0

Any notional improvement was purely accidental I can assure you. This is a pointless block. It doesn't address the reason for my incivility (not only was I eminently polite in the opening exhanges, I will be polite in future as soon as someone stops people like HiLo and the rest being deliberately obtuse for no other reason that to stall the debate and thus get their desired outcome through these despicable means), and it also doesn't teach ignorant pricks like Alex or Resolute or Thryduulf or the countless other luminaries on display in there that no, not everyone's opinion is equally valid, not when it so blatantly contradicts sources or reality, and is basically just 100% grade A-Bullshit straight out of the Insanity Farm they call a brain. Never mind ITN, does anyone ever check if any of these fucktards have ever gone one step further and, instead of just spouting this sort of crap at ITN, has any of them ever got one of their batshit opinions about topics like football into an actual article to present it as fact? Will we find out somewhere in Wikipedia what the blocker position is in association football for example? Is there an article somewhere that really says winning 13 EPL titles is seen as no big deal? Does Alex Ferguson's article really say that his retirement had no impact and was only of local significance? Really? Seriously? Dickheads. If that story fails to get posted, it will not be my fault, it will be primarily down to the ignorant pricks who would not know the consensus process if it was drawn out for them using their own crayons, and secondarily, down to people like you and ThaddeusB who just stood back and watched them piss all over what in reality should have been a very straightforward exchange of facts and evidence leading to a posting nearly 30 hours ago, back when this was actually major breaking news, rather than just ongoing news.

0

e6051f93abeaf26a

I got your point.Ya you are right about all those things.I understand you and have faith on you completely. Chopra article to FA....good idea but all India today sources are dead links ,peer review tells all.Well thanks for your help.....well I must say, you transformed that article completely to an amazing biographical piece of work.We will support you on FA.( )

0

e6052800b57b7fd8

" Thank you very much, ! and Best of Everything to You and Yours! – '''' "

0

e60562b062782b90

Reverts And why did you do this revert ? And going around and blindly reverting other of my edits? Are you a stalker or somethign?

0

e607d1defe236a9c

Template Popes You have changed the title in the Template:Popes from Popes of the Catholic Church to Popes of the Roman Catholic Church. Catholic Church redirects to Roman Catholic Church; so what's the point of your change? Catholic Church is simplier than Roman Catholic Church; so what change it?

0

e60a1494438dd879

" Rant Nice Rant. Check mine out. I got rants on Gamespot, YouTube and Wikipedia. Yeah, I see things differently then most people. You've got a Thank you card! Open your card! Dear Fredil, thank you so much for your beautiful words, your kidness and your trust in me. My Request for Adminship is finally over, and the support and appreciation that the community has gifted me will stick in my mind as long as I live. I have no way to properly express how grateful I am to you for all you've done for me, and all I can tell you is, I'll try not to disappoint you nor anyone else with my use of the buttons... and if I mess up, make sure to come here and give me a good yell! ) Seriously, tho, if you ever need my help, either for admin-related stuff or in any other way, you'll always be welcome to message me, and I promise I'll try my very best. Dear Fredil, I know that your faith in Wikipedia is shaken right now; and tho I didn't have the pleasure of talking to ILP myself, I also feel that his departure is saddening indeed. In moments like this, when everything looks dark, is when friendship, true friendship, shines with a brighter light. ILP understood the value of that friendship better than most people do. I can't think of a better way to keep his thoughts a living part of our project, than offering myself as your own friend; and know that I don't take such an offer lightly. Valuable and great peple like you are rare to find, dear Fredil. There is much beauty in this place, and wonderful people. Don't let the darkness take over you - I'll do my very best to help you keep the light shining bright, I promise ) With a big hug, your friend, ♥ tell me Inspiring words. I should listen to them too. | Speaking for myself only, it's a bit hard to listen to order when there's so much chaos. — (talk) / Agreed. 's RfA Hi Fredil Yupigo!Thank you for taking part in my RfA! Unfortunately, it ended with a final result of (62/23/7), and with only 73% support, no consensus was achieved. Nevertheless, I thank you for your support and I'll be looking for it in my next RfA! ) .H Your sig Hi, I hope you're enjoying your holiday! A note for when you get back: I noticed that you use a template as a signature. Please don't do that, as it's a drain on the servers. You can read the details about that here and elsewhere, there have been some discussions about this in the past. Thanks! [[User

0

e60dc04e589fa266

Template:Infobox road//shield US-Alt – Template:Infobox road//shield US Alt – Template:Infobox road//abbrev US-Alt – Template:Infobox road//abbrev US Alt – Template:Infobox road//link US-Alt – Template:Infobox road//link US Alt – Template:Infobox road//shield US-Bus – Template:Infobox road//shield US Bus – Template:Infobox road//abbrev US-Bus – Template:Infobox road//abbrev US Bus – Template:Infobox road//link US-Bus – Template:Infobox road//link US Bus – Template:Infobox road//shield US-Byp – Template:Infobox road//shield US Byp – Template:Infobox road//abbrev US-Byp – Template:Infobox road//abbrev US Byp – Template:Infobox road//link US-Byp – Template:Infobox road//link US Byp – Template:Infobox road//shield US-Truck – Template:Infobox road//shield US Truck – Template:Infobox road//abbrev US-Truck – Template:Infobox road//abbrev US Truck – Template:Infobox road//link US-Truck – Template:Infobox road//link US Truck – Template:Infobox road//shield US-Spur – Template:Infobox road//shield US Spur – Template:Infobox road//abbrev US-Spur – Template:Infobox road//abbrev US Spur – Template:Infobox road//link US-Spur – Template:Infobox road//link US Spur –

0

e60dd7062d1816d3

WikiNation is Dead You have lost your position. Or have you.....

0

e60dedc37b038fcc

Actually, it is a very good reason. It means that that guideline is nonsense. And you shouldn't protect pages that you are having a dispute in .

0

e60e699acff8d9bc

was taken from Britannica and Columbia Encyclopedia, and the links to the references were provided. You can check White Huns article which

0

e610dcce30e70d38

Wow such a drama queen. Why don't you grow a pair and learn to write properly?

0

e61170fb5c473202

Oh, and just to say: THANK YOU eversomuch for banninating that odious user. Jamesinc14 honks me off to no end. I'm grateful.

0

e6122c732af8b380

"Oh well if an admin says so. "

0

e6132dcce028ee89

" Michael Bay To Produce Gideon's sword? ""Michael Bay To Produce Gideon's sword!"". "

0

e6146f5fb2897913

i dont think i should be blocked be cause yall r illiterate yankees (bunch of idiots)

1

0

1

0

e614b37491ba207b

It's OK, I've just seen it. Fatuorum

0

e6163685c30ca8ce

" My Reply Rjecina, calm down. Please, read my postings carefully, I have never said that Vlahs did not exist. Your comments are ludacris and off topic. Zenanarh, thanks for the reply. I have read the link that you have posted about the term vlah. The website is called ""G-d, Bosnia and Bosniaks"", so i took all of the information describing Serbs with a grain of salt. I did enjoy reading the article, it definietly had a lot of information that could be incorporated into the article (if there is another source backing it up). I have two major concerns. Firstly, the article concentrates on the Bosnian side Vlah's and not the Croatian side (the article is Serbs of Croatia not Serbs of Bosnia). Secondly, the article concludes with ""...when one hears... Russian politicians talking about the need to defend their ancient Slav brothers in Bosnia, that the one component of the Bosnian population which has a large and identifiable element of non-Slav ancestry is the Bosnian Serbs."" I do not know how accurate the article is because of the last statement (in my opinion it leans towards the Muslim side). Also, inside the article there is a mention that Serbian scholars identify the term Vlah with shepards. Irrespectively, I think the article link was a great contribution. After reading the article, the Bosnian Vlah's were ""settled"" by Ottomans. Conversely, Croatian side Vlah's ""escaped"" Ottoman prosecution. This was a mistake in ""Serbs of Croatia"" article, which stated that Vlah's were settled by the Ottomans in Croatia."

0

e61654d5b5f28ac2

wqhy the hell did oyu delete the pocs article

1

0

e61bbc525efce38a

I think that you have a point here...but I can't think about at the moment. Thanks anyway for dropping me a note.

0

e61cf2225410c6b7

‎Like?: Insteaf od partakin gin discussion since I last posted on your waqll (and I havent edited the part in question since then), the user has now insisted on refuting discussion based consensus and goes to ANI. What are we supposed to do if discussion are not followed and this is legitimised/? GHow do I even try to generate a dsicssuion if it is dismissed in favour of such wars without consensus?( ).

0

e61f6110bfca0826

Judging by , the DNB article may conflate two people of the same name. Someone look at the ODNB?

0