id
stringlengths 16
16
| comment_text
stringlengths 6
5k
| toxic
int64 0
1
| severe_toxic
int64 0
1
| obscene
int64 0
1
| threat
int64 0
1
| insult
int64 0
1
| identity_hate
int64 0
1
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
e902ff0b683d14af
|
Fullerene
Thanks for picking up all the vandalism on Fullerene. I thought I got them all. What the hell is going on today with the vandals?
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e906df9e462c22f7
|
"
Thanks -) But I'm not done yet... gabsadds "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e908e5683a691e17
|
":Coren: I've substantially responded on my talk page. It might be better to respond there, if you are minded to respond, to keep this somewhat centralised. talk
"
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e908f4898e882870
|
"
Peridon...
i had a good feeling about you. you are not like the other wikipedia ""snitches"". you are different. dont sell yourself out to being like ""them"". this is not the way to gain self respect.
you know im not a sock. dont get sucked up into their little games.
I will pray for you because i know there is more to you then this spi crap.
you know you are much better then that.
and you know you can contribute alot more to this life then trying to catch ""socks"".
you said that papphase is like you. No that is not true. Papphase is lost in his own thinking.
you are much better then that. done settle for being ""like"" papphase.
i wouldnt want to be like him. he is a very misearable and unhappy being who needs to make others feel less then equal so that he can feel important.
i pray for you.
"
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e90a3260f9b8d2f4
|
Missing editions
Why if we add in the table the editions who were not played and add the information why the final was not play ?
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e90add33a4bb2026
|
"
Public domain photo of Otakar Jaros is more than impossible to find ( He became famous mainly after his death, thus we cannot hope for a lot of pictures. ≈talk≈ "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e90cab8ed70a052e
|
:Plan toys
A tag has been placed on Plan toys, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e90dbadf1854ef26
|
" (""On camera, she specializes in..."")"
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e90dc8b9e4b8f48c
|
Re-removal frackign stuff
I've not c ehcked talk, but I can guess what the complaint will be. As a compromise, want to put the stuff onto the Texas article instead of the frackin one?? ~
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e90df8ae940fd1c8
|
I don't need to revert any more, they're all done as far as I can tell. Fresh actors will need adding to the category, but I'll wait for you to look at it first, thanks Jim. 82.8.252.13
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e9104d08fa9087d3
|
Recent Vandalism
Please do not vandalise the Wikipedia. This is a warning. Thank you.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e910b2f7a3a16588
|
"
Context is everything
I noticed your complaint at the Arbcom enforcement page about Malleus, and I also noticed you had mentioned me there, without providing any diffs. Were you aware of this comment from MONGO from 5 September? If not it might be worth looking at it and considering amending your statement in light of this evidence that at least one (prominent and previously-sanctioned) American editor has started the ball rolling in the nationalism stakes. MONGO has never properly explained what exactly he was on about there, but it seems ridiculous to threaten Malleus with sanctions but not mention the antecedent behavior. Regarding my own behavior there, I have found the degree of resistance of the ""Defenders of the Wiki"" crowd to an article assessment process (that they themselves invited) quite frustrating at times, but I hope that if you feel anything I said there crossed the line, you would have the courtesy to raise it with me in the first instance rather than on an enforcement page. Thanks for your consideration. "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e9116937d45b8aab
|
You are a FIRST RATE A-HOLE. I hope you never lose a child or someone in your life like the Burgess family and have people be so blatantly insentive to you as you are to them. You are a disgrace!
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e912028167725f52
|
"
Obsolete External Link
The link titled, ""Blake Island Visitor Information"" is no longer available. Perhaps it's been shut down; I can't find any reference to it anywhere."
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e9124fc2eecd1343
|
The only reason to include this, is that people take this to be relevant to human health.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e914af635a15ef9e
|
"
Commercial Variants of Rogue in Japan?
In 1991, there is ""Fatal Labyrinth"" (Genesis/Megadrive, 1991) which could be considered as the first commercial variants of Rogue (because it took a lot of ideas from rogue with some extra features) but it's not so good and successful.
""Fushigi no Dungeon"" series (starting from ""Torneko no Daibouken"" in 1993) themself are the most successful titles in Japan and start the trend of Japanese console roguelike games.
Fushigi no Dungeon have much tighter game balance, so that the challenge level is just right. Some role playing games (such as Climax Landers and Evolution) have also imported some roguelike concepts (primarily the randomly generated dungeon), but honestly not to any satisfactory effect, since the randomly generated dungeon plays little significance if battles take part in a different environment (namely, the orthodox RPG combat engine). Without its effect on playability, a randomly generated dungeon would in fact feel featureless and boring.
How they can be the variants of rogue?
- Feature one class which is warrior-type or Jack-of-all-trades. Supernatural powers are rely on items.
- Simple stats.
- Dungeon theme is a lot like rogue.
- Item sets like Potion, Wand (or rod), and Scroll. ""Furai no Shiren"" also add Pots which are work as containers or item manipulating tools.
- ETC.
Just some thought and review..."
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e918f00a128bc71e
|
"
Adoption
Hello Elennaro, I see you are seeking adoption. I would be happy to adopt you if you like. Let me know if you are interested. Best. talk to me "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e9196371a1905217
|
"
Fascism
Bob - when I used this term to describe your behaviour I wasn't being insulting but merely factual - if you look it up on wiki you'll see: ""Fascism (pronounced /ˈfæʃɪzəm/) is a radical and authoritarian nationalist political ideology.Fascists seek to organize a nation according to corporatist perspectives, values, and systems, including the political system and the economy.""
I'm merely saying you are taking an authoritarian and corporatist view of your role.
Please would you remove that rather rude and unpleasant ""up yours"" image from your page. It really is not consistent with any of the values espoused by wiki."
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e919a67570d6bdb5
|
"
I rewrote the introduction
I hope nobody minds. I think it is clearer now, and I wanted to link it to this page to the""nuclear fuel"" page. "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e919f60a69a5437a
|
"
Discussion moved from Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Doctor Who
I know you're all probably sick to your back teeth of hearing about it, but considering how we have just changed the name of the 1996 television film to Doctor Who (1996) (in my personal opinion, an infinitely better name), why not try to resolve the seemingly never ending debate of whether it is 100,000 BC or An Unearthly Child? Talk:100,000 BC (Doctor Who)
19:02, 9th January 2006 (GMT)
Okay can we also try to bring peace to the Middle East and Northern Ireland, bring harmony between all religions, sort out whether the UK is an international or European country and all those other things that have been fiercely argued a lot? ;-)
I hate to say it, but I think the debate is about to get a second wind, seeing as the upcoming American DVD release, The Beginning dubs the story An Unearthly Child and also uses the Edge of Destruction name for the Inside the Spaceship two-parter...
I think you're right, and that we should think about people less familiar with the original series; after all, a lot of people who have only watches the Ninth and Tenth Doctors in action will snap up the boxset, to learn more about Doctor Who. Calling it An Unearthly Child will not only help these ""newbies"", but also seeth the feelings of quite a lot of Whovians I know. (As well as this, at least half of the sources I have seen - official or otherwise - call it ""An Unearthly Child""). 20:39, 9 January 2006
The current opener to the article and the redirects handle the requirements anyway. Fandom has long been deeply divided and I don't think some notion of appeasing one wing of the debate should direct where the Wikipedia page is located.
I agree. As long as the proper redirects are in place and the article acknowledges the alternate titles, I think we're good. This isn't quite the same situation we had with the TV movie when an off-the-cuff remark by the producer calling it Enemy Within came to be seen as somehow official. (And the Doctor Who Information Network here in Canada apparently uses a different title altogether that was mentioned in a CBC profile of the series made to tie in with the Eccleston season. I forget the name that was used.).
The CBC profile I think used ""Out of the Ashes"", which apparently came from a misreading of Shannon Patrick Sullivan's webpage. As for 100,000 BC vs. An Unearthly Child, I agree that the redirects and article opening make the issue less pressing, but I also think that the title used in the DVD release (which isn't just in the US, but UK as well) lends a bit more weight to the An Unearthly Child argument. However, if we do reconsider the page's location, I agree that it shouldn't be about appeasing one group or another, but what's best for the article. — (talk • contribs)
The DVD releases seal it for me - these should both be at their DVD titles, with the others being redirects.
That's a good point to raise. I personally believe that it should be An Unearthly Child; but then it's not up to me, and I fully understand where Josiah is coming from. Why don't we settle this once and for all: a democratic vote where Whovians like ourselves vote for one title or the other. Anyone else agree/have another idea? 16:18, 11 January 2006
I'll put my vote in as An Unearthly Child also.
It's been said before, but I'll say it again. The title of the serial is 100,000 BC. The title of the first episode is ""An Unearthly Child"". The fact that BBC Enterprises releases the DVD as ""An Unearthly Child"" is a matter of marketing, not historicity, and neither here nor there. The real reason the serial was called An Unearthly Child to begin with was because of a mistake by the Radio Times. AUC redirects to the right page, and there's no confusion. I'd rather rename The Daleks to The Mutants rather than change 100,000 BC to that. (talk • contribs) 16:39, 11 January 2006
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e91b696335a03734
|
And besides, I thought you and I were on avoiding terms.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e91cf346bdf4a46f
|
"I don't understand your last edit comment where you said I reintroduced first-person terms - I didn't. Whether ""water"" counts as the same word or not is an open question - if one individuated words according to their meaning (a perfectly plausible way to do it) then it would seem not, if words were individuated some other way then possibly. In any event I note the current version does not say they are the same word so it matters not. The only difference then, in your version, is the introduction of the names Frederick and Froderick and I am not going to revert over something like that. When you ask me to take the nonsense somewhere else I should remind you that the Twin earth section was wrong yesterday and correct today precisely on account of my involvement. I would have thought that some thanks were due rather than an unpleasant request such as this. In any event I did take the nonsense somewhere else - I took it out the section on Twin Earth and threw it away. That is why my correct version is what currently appears in the article.
"
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e91ed160988f3f48
|
Biting a newbie
It is unfortunate that you were made an admin when you lack the maturity to resist threatening and intimidating a newbie because you didn't like what they said to a friend. Until you gain such maturity I urge you to go out of your way to express yourself in a more considered, phlegmatic, diplomatic manner.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e924fd05ebc93710
|
revert to a vandalised version. I've reverted to the clean version. Cheers. – Chacor
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e9260771eafa86c1
|
I would like to know how to suck a C O ( K
| 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e927a67005dd1d83
|
Your susgestion to improve the article is?~~~~
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e92a7731547be44a
|
"
Contrary to your inane ideas, you do not own me or Wikipedia. Do not tell me to be silent, or tell me how to write! And do not think that you can dictate what appears in Wikipedia!
The following statements will be personal. You have made that necessary. I made no personal reference toward you, or anyone else. However, you made an inaccurate, subjective attack against me. Note that I have never made any edit whatsoever to the entry in question. I only expressed my concern one time on the discussion page. And you continue to censor and vandalize my statement.
Yes, I realize that you immediately removed my comment because of your own racial prejudice. That is known as censorship. That is why I immediately reposted it, and why I am doing so again.
You obviously have a very limited knowledge of the English language, and might more appropriately edit the Spanish-language version. Your statements here, as well as the others that you sent to me personally, are false, incorrect, inaccurate, misleading, rude and belligerent. I did not attack you or anyone else. And my assertions are completely correct. You criticize my comment, even though you are not even capable of reading and understanding it. Your writing is unintelligible, and your allegations are unfounded. Try to at least read and understand the one, referenced, sentence. Martin did not ""found"" a book, and he did not publish a foundation. The Ricky Martin Foundation has NEVER been published in ANY language. It certainly was not ""first published in Spanish"". This one statement, alone, exemplifies your profound ignorance. You do not know the meaning of the word ""found"". You have no idea what a foundation is. And you have absolutely no familiarity with the Ricky Martin Foundation. You are merely upset that I objected to the unnecessary, irrelevant use of Spanish on this English language wiki. Your objection is racially motivated and illegitimate. While I do not intend to elucidate the myriad of other examples, suffice it to say that a similar analysis would apply to every statement that you have made. You attempt to present yourself as an expert on everything, while in reality you are clueless in regard to most things.
Further, you try to condemn me for doing exactly what you are doing. However, I did not do those things. You presume to educate me, while it is painfully obvious that you are only a very poorly-educated person. You accuse me of making a personal attack that does not improve the article. But you are making false statements in order to advance your personal attack on me. The truth is that I have never made any edit to the article.
The arrogance of stupidity is astounding! I strongly suggest that you do not attempt to censor me, that you do attempt to acquire at least a rudimentary education, and that you do try to follow your own advice.66.166.137.98 "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e92b80ffaf44e987
|
"
As for the Tahirids, Saffarids, Samanids etc., Wikipedia's History of Iran article has them down more accurately as ""Iranian semi-independent governments"". They were regional dynasties under the Abbasid caliphate. As Michael Axworthy explains (Iran p.87): ""The first of the regional dynasties to establish itself as a real rival to central authority was that of the Taherids of Khorasan, followed by the Saffarids of Sistan and the Samanids - all dynasties of Iranian origin. The Samanids were based on Bokhara and the region around Balkh, claiming descent from the Sassanid prince Bahram Chubin. Each of these dynasties (especially the Samanids), and those that followed (notably the Ghaznavids and the Buyids), tended to set up courts adorned with Persian bureaucrats, scholars, astrologers and poets in imitation of the great caliphal court of Baghdad, as enhancements of their prestige, and as a disguise for their tenure of power, which otherwise might have appeared as more nakedly dependent on brute military force."" "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e92bfd942307b389
|
Danny, I would be very happy to have their view expressed as well. Here you/we are saying that Josephus is biased. On the Jesus page, he is noted as a being reliable. Perhaps it depends strongly on what is being said about whom, though I do not know this is necessarily the case. It does not dismiss them, they are still real and present. The question as to descent could be answered rather well via DNA testing of their Priests and Levites as well as mitochrondrial DNA testing. But there is risk, the desired results might not be obtained.
Would this meet the need:
The Samaritans have insisted that they are direct descendants of the Northern Israelite tribes of Ephraim and Manasseh, who survived the destruction of the Northern kingdom of Israel by the Assyrians in 722 B.C.E. The inscription of Sargon II records the deportation of a relatively small proportion of the Israelites (27,290, according to the annals), so it is quite possible that a sizable population remained that could identify themselves as Israelites, the term that the Samaritans prefer for themselves.
Samaritan historiography would place the basic schism from the remaining part of Israel after the twelve tribes conquered the land of Canaan, lead by Joshua. After Joshua's death, Eli the priest left the tabernacle which Moses erected in the desert and established on Mount Gerizim, and built another one under his own rule in the hills of Shilo (1 Sam 1:1-3; 2:12-17). Thus, he established both an illegitimate priesthood and an illegitimate place of worship.
According to this description, the Jews are the dissidents! 03:51, 29 Jan 2004 (UTC)
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e92c19b82c06c743
|
Europe language map
How is that language map going?
Argh. Not so well it seems. Too much going on. But thanks for reminding me, I will get on it.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e92c49012e56b0fc
|
Spam Page Deletion
I'd like to ask you for advice as I'm still a junior member. I've been very active on the Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion for the past few days as I try to learn about Wikipedia and join new projects often. I've just taken a closer look at your templates and links and I have to admit your work is very impressive. You ideas for finding vandalism are very efficient. It's great we have people like you here. I've made a brief search using your engine and found hundreds of pages advertising stuff. What should I do now? In my opinion, taking it to the discussion page is totally inefficient as it will take years to discuss all this spam. However, I guess that's what is done here. Should I start putting several spam pages for discussion every day now? Should I leave it all alone - but in that case - why do we have those discussions anyway? Can't an Admin delete all those pages quickly? Thanks in advance and keep up the awesome work.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e92c6d35265a099f
|
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Comedy. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e92c852bf31f214d
|
"
They are definitely NOT emo. Come on. Emo music reflects death and the band wear makeup and cut themselves. I can't believe so many otherwise good wikipedia editors believe that all pop punk and alt rock bands are emo. This is completely false and too many people think it is true. Just listen to the band's newer music. It sounds completely different from emo and even from what most people think of emo as today. Calling this band emo is insulting them to the highest degree. (talk)
"
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e92cc0d5936cda69
|
i would be astonished if you could produce one unless it was something like that guy that asserts that the holocaust never happened.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e92e52d3b795c795
|
"
The Little Things Give You Away
The Little Things Give You Away has an article because it passes WP:GNG. If you disagree, take it to WP:AFD.chballer "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e9302862e8b14567
|
Come on man......your being rediculous just beacause you diagree with me. Do you see what I wrote above before your wrote this? Be reasonable.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e932d1bbeb4c3369
|
"
Reply
Sunnah.com is cited to cite Tirmidhi Hadith. See http://sunnah.com/urn/675760
Quranic verses are often cited to negate Mirza
I agree http://alhafeez.org/ is a fan-portal but it is only used to show contents of book
www.inter-islam.org is not a fan portal it represents an organisation that has centres of Dawah around the globe primarily Pakistn
Also you forgot: Where Pakistan's most well known Scholar of Islam Abul A'la Maududi criticise Mirza; also on the Quranic verses I proved
You also removed False Prophecies, which has Mirza sources:
Mirza stated:
His critics have shown various ""prophecies"" not to hold water.Who Was the Impostor of Qadian? A few of his prophecies include:
But Mirza only lived for 68 years.
But Mirza died in Lahore.
Please rather than seeing this an opportunity to spread your belief, see yourself as a ""Wikipedian"""
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e933549ba7aae026
|
"
you can edit now '''' (cricket calendar poll!'') "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e936bd8f5c7efb9d
|
on material abstracted from http://www.ou.org/torah/author/26740.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e937c6ffe10e5d59
|
"-I know what you mean. The ""Cannon"" series can also be translated to ""Phoenix"" (Grand Battle using ""Single Sword Rising Phoenix"" and ""Triple Sword Rising Phoenix"") Maybe we should leave short translation notes to explain the double meanings of some attacks. Also, we should rename ""Santoryu Attacks"" to ""Zoro's Attacks"" and have Ittoryu (Single Sword), Nittoryu (Double Sword) and Santoryu (Triple Sword) as subheadings so that we can organise them better.
"
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e937daa8176e3b16
|
, yet you are unable to even make an NPOV list of external links
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e9387b522e3ba282
|
"
OK, thanks for the quick reply. I have only one more question. One image from Bollywoodblog was featured on Zinta's article, but was not licensed under bblog's license; it was a fair use image which was used to provide a critical commentary. Does it mean that it has to be deleted too? It wasn't licensed with this bblog agreement. • Talk2me "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e93984cdc96d02fe
|
"
PRODs are intended to be entirely uncontroversial, so they become void when somebody contests them—even after deletion, in most cases. –'''''' | Talk "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e939f1d61b54c4a6
|
Perhaps Gamaliel, but is it neutral? I think not. Anyways the information in the infobox is redundant, on those grounds alone it should still be removed ASAP.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e93c28c09d46050d
|
The pictures are quite unacceptable. There are really fine examples available.
The differences between UK, USA and Export models should be shown such as trafficators, LHD/RHD and PF770 headlights. No white sidewalls at all. No two-tone paint, even different wheel color. Must show painted ring on hubcaps and rimbellishers on wheels.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e93dfc49c47a50e7
|
, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
This is the tail wagging the dog. Some editors want to say that Rawat charges for Knowledge and are trying to find any source that will support their POV. But he hasn't, doesn't and won't charge for Knowledge. You're wasting your, and our, time. 21:37
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e93eebf4372c918b
|
Was it really necessary to list all these luxury outlets here?
Oh, and you forgot the Lamborghini.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e93f4a8334a194e1
|
Cliff Hangers
When adding links to material on an external site, please ensure that the external site is not violating the creator's copyright. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website's operator has created or licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
Please be careful not to make the same edit adding links to copyrighted material on YouTube as you did in the following edits:
Revision as of 20:54, 21 April 2010
Revision as of 21:54, 2 April 2010
Revision as of 17:06, 17 January 2010
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e93ff50a1251dc4e
|
"
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.-'''''Bacon''''' "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e9401c0c4c7afafe
|
Weird edit
Sorry folks. I posted two edits to this article by accident. My intent was to revert one edit, but it looks like somehow I also managed to revert a chopped off text on the political controversy as a 2nd revert. If that one's wrong or anything feel free to fix it. Thanks
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e94156f38c59e8c8
|
haha me grow up!? kid get a life and stop reverting ppls edits before you get banned
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e94258bf4c9477da
|
"
""Vandalism""
The issue you reprimanded me about correcting was vandalism as the anonymous user had created a disruptive edit and removed the upper text. So perhaps you will note that in any contacts you have with any other editors on this matter? "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e943129d38957424
|
"BTW ""Weismüller"" is not a traditional serb name, neither romanian... hey, yo! -)
"
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e9440c1d9fb41a7d
|
.
Please do not talk to me.
Thank-you
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e9483502af141f0b
|
Ttaemiri is famous and notable job. so we can translated Korean wikipedia.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e949f403101a9797
|
you will see hell again.no matter what on earth i must do the wiki will accept myPOV or be crushed
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e94a093e21a185a3
|
"
A barnstar for you!
The Surreal Barnstar Hey Matty, looks like you've been gone since November...
I'm sorry to see this, I understand the need to take a break; but I hope you do come back eventually. We miss you. hadley "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e94a89c941e435d4
|
Oh so you think you can intimidate me? Well I'm sticking to my guns - KEEP FIGHTING THOSE VANDALS, BRAVE WARRIOR!!!
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e94fe27cc21f798e
|
You see there? How predictable.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e950464f08004fee
|
population ?
id like to know the population of this city? i understand that the population of the whole island was 86,637 in 2004 but id like to know how much of that was the capital of nueva gerona.
76.211.5.253
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e95280f6815e95eb
|
There are several options you could consider. The most direct would be posting a move request on WP:RM in the Uncontroversial moves section. Make sure you mention that there has already been a discussion on the talk page (Provide a link to the section so the admin doesn't have to search for it) and that you would like an administrator to review the discussion. If the admin's or another editor move it out of Uncontroversial moves, you'll probably have to restart the discussion using the process described on WP:RM.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e9547e74781ec104
|
At the time Avi stepped in to stop the move war, the page was at Voßstraße. Therefore, protection had to be applied to that version.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e95550d20dca1736
|
Travel Plan and Helge Keitel
Thanks for your information. I'm new to Wikipeida and this is a learning process. What do you suggest? Digital Villages is the main subjet I m working with and the idea is to integrate experiences from Italy into this.
Yours
Helge Keitel
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e957c1c086af60b3
|
"
Since Hart is your preferred source and Ryan is seemingly some untrustworthy person who makes up evidence, I decided to cite a source you could not question. I am not suggesting linking this group with any killings, but my point remains that with (bare minimum) accusations of membership of a combatant group, they should not be described as civilians. You failed to address my point that any reader seeing the phrase ""Protestant men"" would not think of anything else but civlians surely? "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e95b6ece26731481
|
Well, take the fact that you have been born with two languages and run with it. I only wish I was so lucky. (talk··Advise me)
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e95b9ac786dbb2b2
|
"
Everything what I read here is unhistorical - to say it gentle...
1. Karl der Große (Charlemagne) wasnt French, he was a Frank: the name France comes from the germanic tribe of the Franken
2. To talk about Germany and France in this time is simply a joke. nationbuilding began more than 200 years later
3. they watched the Romans building a bridge and then they ran away? Dont take it personal, but this article isnt about Britain - witch was invaded as Gallien was. The Romans where overruled by trying to invade ""Germania"" more than 3 times. The building of the colonies Germania magna and Germania inferior was more to make some good propaganda in Rome, cause the main population was there was Celtic, and the Germanic people there where new settlers looking for new ground.
4. There is no Germany till 1871. Till that days Germany was splitted into 39 states, before 1815 into the unbelievable amount of more than 200 states. The states where fighting more each other than the foreign states, and so every invasion made by foreign nations was made with the help of some German states against some others.
5. What about the 30 years of war 1518- 1548, where the half of the population died? I know that you are obsessed with WWI and WWII but the history of Germany is mutch longer than that.
6. Austria and Germany where part of the holy roman empire of the German nation, and its unhistorical to devide them from Germany till the year of 1871
7. I know you will hate the idea, but when you take all of this together you have to write 200 German war- historys (Brandenburg, Sachsen, Hessen, Bayern, Schlesien, Hanse- cities...) till 1871, and from that day on you can begin your article
8. Its better to end this project; or start it 1871."
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e95bd5628ad139f0
|
Rewrite underway
This article is currently being rewritten as part of Wiki Academy Kosovo. The draft for that sits at
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e95c499d40020867
|
"Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. — (talk) 13:03, 03 August '06"
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e95dab452daf7f74
|
You're a Mathsci sockpuppet, aren't you?
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e95ec58b1ac82d32
|
TREKFAN
I don't want to be known as a Trekkie OR a Trekker!! I don't care where Lt. Barclay was born or Spock's last name. I just enjoy the great stories in the shows. They are fine drama that happen to take place in the 'sci-fi' future. So-I want to anounce hear and now that I AM A TREKFAN!!
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e9608f0e1d9f3777
|
"
Welcome!Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Manual of Style
Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
Please respect others' copyrights; do not copy and paste the contents from webpages directly.
Please use a neutral point of view when editing articles; this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add unreasonable contents into any articles, such as: copyrighted text, advertisement messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Adding such unreasonable information or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism, and will result in your account being blocked.
The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. Again, welcome!Mak050389 "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e961d2edf17b090c
|
"
Possible move
I'm a bit confused as to why this is called ""Star Fox (series)"". This makes someone think of a TV series. Wouldn't ""Star Fox (franchise)"" or ""Star Fox (video game)"" or ""Star Fox (video game franchise)"" make more sense? "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e9630a5e4e34348e
|
Loosing Battle
Dude, just looking at your list of topics it would seem like you are fighting more than a few loosing battles.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e963ab71ce9dd8ad
|
"
The Colossus of Rhodes
I noticed the summary of God of War II stated that Zeus brought the Colossus of Rhodes to life. In the game, a bird is shown flying past the Colossus, and brings it to life when it touches it. The same bird then touches Kratos and shrinks him to his normal size. Kratos cries out ""Athena!"", not Zeus. Athena also stated earlier in the game that she was the one who gave Kratos his godly powers, and that he should not turn his back on her. It can be deduced from that that it is Athena who brings the Colossus to life, not Zeus."
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e9644b063e47958a
|
It also isn't appropriate to put a non-article in Wikipedia. By your own admission above, your entry was a comment. Please see WP:FORUM. In fact, I suggest you read (or re-read) the whole of WP:NOT!
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e9648a8f3afaa1fa
|
"
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Katie Couric. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Talk/contrib "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e964f417db9ee58b
|
Slam time again
Hi there. I notice that during the 2011 Australian Open you attempted to delete the day to day article and advised the removal of another silly table thing. Well guess what there back on the 2011 French Open page. I have been bold and removed both and we have a load of people going I like and nothing else. None of whom can come up with a constructive reason why they should be kept. Your view on why it is not suitable for wikipedia would be suitable here
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e9656af2c9c55f8c
|
"""As a matter of practice user talk pages are generally not deleted, however, exceptions to this can be and are made on occasion for good reason (see right to vanish)""
"
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e965c0688703a1f3
|
Wrong. The caption is not POV. You obviously jumped the gun, because I was still writing my explanation of the revert when you sent me a note. Read my comments in the discusion.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e966866c0eccbc43
|
Dinant
Pleeease read the talk page.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e96783011fec14b0
|
Why do you think it should be included in this article amongst respectable, academic sources?
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e96a05e78d9a776e
|
Dave Wain adds: By removing my article on Domain Validation (email) you have prevented developers and investigators from having a valuable source of information. By preventing email from being safe, you are indirectly endangering millions of people and costing the Police thousands of man-hours.
Dave Wain also adds: By removing my Web Session comments you trying to rewrite history. There are considerable financial ramifications which if malevolent, could result in legal repercussions for yourself and Wikimedia.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e96a98e7a4fa528e
|
See his problem of understanding.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e96b768aeaaa2a86
|
which I omitted foreshadowed the discussion about the Cold War in the next sentence. It is safe to assume
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e96d7fa737b44d7a
|
"
reconstruction
the article used to claim the ZoU is the ""only major remainder of Ur"". This, I suspect, is nonsense. If the ziggurat is today the most imposing feature of the site, it is because it has been reconstructed, not because it was in any way better preserved than the other ruins of the city. Or else this needs substatiantion from some credible reference. It would also be worth noting when it was rebuilt and under whose authority. (𒁳) "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e96f1c8a4a65be38
|
Model engineering
Thanks for your work here, it has been needed for some time.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e972b70ee40b2d64
|
reach a more acceptable Treaty
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e97649dd01fa1d0b
|
Check on User: Kd lvr User:Kdkatpir2 User:WTAEchick
Does this [] mean we are okay?
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e9781c4a5152df09
|
nothing really
Bold Text
Hey i am bored and have nothing else to do this is also my first day on wiki ily4eva521
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e978a1f972d719e2
|
, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Use of the Vuvuzela is going to be a massive controversy in this world cup. It;'s annoying as hell, players have complained about it, and you cannot hear the television commentary because it is blown constantly during games. The SA authorities have even had to clarify that, being a rather large object, it won't be banned from grounds under FIFA rules about safety. This has all been covered in main stream media. I have no clue what a Diski dance is though. 20:28
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e978a4d495d65d53
|
"Yes, second imposter in a few days. But what now? If I voice my suspicions I risk being ""blocked for disruption"" according to (moved here from Tonwyalton for continuity)
"
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e979e1095ca904a6
|
SK newsletter
That is a good idea regarding Current, kept, and deleted articles. Which newsletter was it, and how did they find the articles? I think Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser would be able to do quite a lot of these as I used it to compile a list of recent tagged articles for Saskatchewan, so could use it to find those in Category Saskatchewan and Category Deletion as well. ... as Saskatchewan is quite unique for a word. How are you doing? You are still very busy on wikipedia! 'Tis getting time to get the February newsletter as the end of month is rolling around too fast this time. On a side note...with the leap year, met someone getting married on the last day, which will make their anniversaries very interesting. Kind Regards Julia
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e97b1ce27116d1e7
|
Image:Crossroads2.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Crossroads2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. talk
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e97b90592860399a
|
can someone please review my request........?
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e97d6342d641c831
|
WHO THE FUCK DO YOU THINK YOU ARE DELETING THE SMS SECTION TO THE SYDNEY GANG RAPES - IT IS SOURCED AND VERIFIED AND NOT BIASED - SO WHY THE FUCK DID YOU REVERT IT - REVERT THE THINGS WHICH YOU THINK TO BE UNSOURCED, BUT NOT EVERYTHING YOU IDIOT - IT WAS IN THE ARTICLE FOR MONTHS AND MONTHS UNTIL TWO DAYS AGO, AND YOU DIDNT HAVE A PROBLEM WITH IT THEN - STOP YOUR ISLAMIC AGENDA TO HIDE THE TRUTH OF THE RAPES THAT THEY WERE RACIST - LOOK AT THE SMS MESSAGES INCITE BASH A CHRISTIAN!!! YOU FUCKING SCUM!!! I HOPE YOU HAVE A DAUGHTER AND SHE IS RAPED AND SHE IS TOLD SHE DESERVES IT BECAUSE SHE IS AN AUSIE PIG, THEN WHEN YOU MAKE AN UTTERANCE ABOUT IT, WE'LL CALLYOU RACIST AND THEN WHITEWASH THE TRUTH
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
e97df4832738e937
|
"
Thankyou!
Thank you for helping me become accustomed to Wikipedia; We can make a great team in the future - I'm Sure!
"
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e980115e9b16cd92
|
"
SCA
Does that mean you have a coat of arms or adopted a coat of arms for your family? Or do you not have quite that much personal interest, and it mostly scholarly? [tk] "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e98018cf86c7fe7d
|
thanks for your help.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e980c45aefb5216d
|
"==GA Review==
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Jefferson Davis/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: (talk · contribs)
I will review. ★★★★ "
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e9812c965185fd11
|
Bias?
There's not many reviews posted up that show how this album was largely reviled by critics. further more, NME didnt give it 8/10. they gave it 2/10.
it's mostly about how great the album did, when it didnt really.
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.