Datasets:
tasksource
/
jigsaw_toxicity

Dataset card Data Studio Files Community
1
id
stringlengths
16
16
comment_text
stringlengths
6
5k
toxic
int64
0
1
severe_toxic
int64
0
1
obscene
int64
0
1
threat
int64
0
1
insult
int64
0
1
identity_hate
int64
0
1
f20535727e4f35a1
To be or not to be....is that the question? )
0
0
0
0
0
0
f205b5b7c267b827
SCOTUS decision related to GG and online threats being brought more inline with prosecuting other types of threats Synopsis from Forbes. It is probably relevant to the other section regarding legislation. It seems the decision makes online threat prosecutions closer to other threat prosecutions (i.e. it must be specific and credible) but it did overturn a conviction the court decided didn't meet those requirements (I will get the full opinion to see if it was a remand but it probably wasn't). If nothing else, it makes legislation mentioned in the other section more difficult or moot as the source comments on it.
0
0
0
0
0
0
f20702cde2286c91
Tikal map Hi I have managed to fix my Coreldraw problems so now can get on with the map at last ! I'll get on to it this weekend as bit busy with work till Thursday night doing our yearly deep clean. Ill update you then ¬)
0
0
0
0
0
0
f207e5cfde1f2d23
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apotheosis#In_the_Roman_Catholic_church I think this needs citation.
0
0
0
0
0
0
f207ed074493db15
I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN LOSER ==== I AM AN LOSER == == I AM AN
1
0
0
0
0
0
f20820679f8493e4
I don't know why LessHeard developed his email caveat, but I do have my own puzzlement. I see a paradox in the confidentiality of email. If the guy says 'Please unblock me,' and the admin who gets the message wants to discuss that on the wiki, how can he do so? Is he supposed to keep it secret that the guy wants to be unblocked? Or, does confidentiality prevent him from forwarding that mail to another admin to get a second opinion? I suppose there is no perfect way to fix this without a written policy, and that would be instruction creep. Individual admins could create their own caveats. I hope they don't pick the version chosen by LessHeard because we should be able to be more sympathetic than that.
0
0
0
0
0
0
f20aef313548e313
" No, it would be a new tmeplate and the terrorism template could either be below the new template or be a link inside the new template. ""I do not agree either with the fact that all Islamist terrorism related entries ""branch off"" from this one, they are simply related to this one."" - then why have a Muhammad template? All articles related to Muhammad also branch off from Islam, correct? There you go. (talk•contribs) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
f20bd6958e3f815b
"|decline=Checkuser confirmed sockpuppet. juicetalk "
0
0
0
0
0
0
f20d873943c4b42d
There were way more than 110,000 Axis prisoners taken at the battle of Stalingrad. The 110,000 was from the Germans alone, and this article fails to count the thousands of Italian, Romanian, and Hungarian prisoners captured during the battle.
0
0
0
0
0
0
f20e31dca3860d1b
No, but the Bulgarians on the website are. What an appropriate title wouldn't you say? BulGAYria.
0
0
0
0
0
0
f20e5f0d879b72a7
Two mentions of the phony attendance figure for WrestleMania III are redundant, and a pro wrestling event is not a sporting facility tenant. Perhaps an admin needs to tell the marks at WP:PW about WP:OWN.
0
0
0
0
0
0
f2126b830cf80981
" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to The Prebendal School. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. (talk) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
f21273066a900d8e
Yeah, I think you can go ahead and nominate if for FL, I've done what I can.
0
0
0
0
0
0
f2134b8f837bae1c
And what kind of mistakes are these? And which editions of the Guiness Book are these found in? Who ranks the credibility of these websites? Most of them seemed to be articles, what's to have stopped some of them from using information from other articles or perhaps say used the number cited from wikipedia itself? Anyways leaving that side, let me know which editions from the Guinness Book they have made errors in and what they were. I can understand the editors of the Guinness Book can make a mistake, but it's difficult to say they could have made a mistake in reading a statistic that says 100,000,000 and writing it down as 65,000,000 instead. JFonseka
0
0
0
0
0
0
f213c13e2a9878ee
Have also registered the old account and sent the email to me aswell.
0
0
0
0
0
0
f213cedfb419c409
-to-me]] 12:51, 13 February 2010
0
0
0
0
0
0
f214214bdc9873ad
Mark you wish to pursue the inclusion of your blog, which likely won't be accepted since it is a blog, you can make use of the WP:Dispute process... specifically third party options. All the best. - Boy
0
0
0
0
0
0
f2148cfe63f21985
Support . –For the numerous reasons already given, but primarily because the ʻokina is a useful pronunciatory aid which can be learnt in ten seconds by readers of the article unfamiliar therewith.
0
0
0
0
0
0
f2160797a563117f
It is certainly a case of shooting from the hip and not giving due process a chance. There is the talk page and other dispute resolution processes to address neutrality concerns. This admin neither explains their neutrality concerns (even when requested repeatedly) nor gives due process a chance and their communication solely consists of waving the admin gun and shooting. They just seem to get people into their cross-hairs and shoot at the first possible chance. Period.
0
0
0
0
0
0
f217f16ed1d349c6
Yes, it does. Do you need verification of some kind? I am new to Wikipedia.
0
0
0
0
0
0
f2194a9a8b6c91f6
What are you on about? THere is no permanent sanction to replace. This isn't a reduction at all, it is the imposition of a new thing
0
0
0
0
0
0
f21ef72bad674ad7
well i can guarantee that brazil has more potential to be energy superpower that canada.recentily they discovery a biggest gas reserve in world in santos sao paulo and a big oil reserve too,and brasil has potential energy in other sources like hydroelectricity, have a biggest reserve of uranium in world, believe or not, the future will be witness of brazil energy superpower and brazil superpower,and now start already!
0
0
0
0
0
0
f21f4330bf3d51c6
Sloppy admin work? Was the below post by toddst1 really needed? Did it add value to wikipedia? Toddst1, please consider putting yourself up for an admin recall. Best 24.52.237.81
0
0
0
0
0
0
f22335207366754c
The subsection is about societal attitudes toward homosexuality in Ancient Greece. What societal attitude is depicted in the picture?
0
0
0
0
0
0
f223c30019548d5d
His actions also robbed Wikipedia visitors from the ability to read the variety of Mashichist views as they are presnted very differntly on Messiah Watch International compared to http://www.moshiach.ca or Jewish Women United for redemption jewishwomenunited.org
0
0
0
0
0
0
f22427319aeb160d
" But you are a troll. If the cap fits, wear it. talk "
0
0
0
0
0
0
f2269b10800653b2
"::::I agree with Ykraps. Also I do not believe using the words ""less straightforward"" is overly editorialising, nor is it condescending. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
f22a40b13e14a985
Number of saves under a particular name, or seniority, is an indicator, or predictor, of someone's writing or editing ability(?) I think my contributions improved a not-very-good article, but comments, including snide ones, are welcome.
0
0
0
0
0
0
f22bb2c26eac165b
" Hello, Sutherll and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! |}"
0
0
0
0
0
0
f22c40d5c1462a9d
The changes to the article have been removed, again, in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Again, if you have the details on the sources needed to establish notability, I will be more than happy to help you add them. Adding this information again without the required sources will mean that the information will be removed again, and may be treated as vandalism if Wikipedia policies are not followed.
0
0
0
0
0
0
f22cd3ccf2ae12b1
Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Repeat: Daedalus969 is a biznitch Rep
0
0
0
0
1
0
f22ce34a660cbe49
" Here's more illiterate text by Jeffro77, in response to me on the ""Existence of God"" Talk page: ""Given that an edit cannot read, I suppose that yes, my edit isn't 'literate'."" So not only does Jeffro77 not know what a proper citation consists of, Jeffro77 also doesn't know the meanings of the word ""literate,"" which is comically fitting. To quote one definition of ""literate"" from The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (Houghton Mifflin Company, Fourth Edition, 2000): ""3. Well-written; polished: a literate essay."" The proceedings regarding the article edits would be absurdist comedy if Jeffro77 and his defenders were regarded with the proper weight befitting their knowledge on this subject and their propensity to make false claims regarding it. But for now it remains a sick joke.74.4.222.208 "
0
0
0
0
0
0
f22dd43b6795d728
Ok. keep it simple.
0
0
0
0
0
0
f22df8758379e489
" No,one user is. However, it could be a case that they forgot to login so I don't advise a sock puppet investigation. - írísh αnd prσud "
0
0
0
0
0
0
f22f55bc5e2ec9e1
Leave me the fuck alone NOW. I have ahd it with you. -
1
0
1
0
0
0
f230ccf3a3e1b285
" TAB Forgive me but I am not so familiar with the Wikipedia jargon. What are ""diffs""? TAB TAB I am also confused by your sentence: ""Also, from the sounds of it it may look like a dispute mostly on content""... well, what if it is? Are you saying that if its ""mostly on content"" then perhaps I need to go through some different dispute resolution path? "
0
0
0
0
0
0
f23238a064936891
There is no reason why you can not change it yourself if you can properly source the information.
0
0
0
0
0
0
f23241f21fd3d767
Too Cool Please please please... get a life...should you not continue being a boring bastardtits lawyer and stop spoiling my giggles ps do you live with your mum ??? pps i speak french too, voulais vous F**K YOU! ppps hugs babes
1
0
1
0
1
0
f23392889cee6ffd
" Arbitrary omission of ""See also"" reference to One-hitter (smoking) Revision as of 20:43, 22 June 2011 (view source)Mjpresson (talk | contribs) (→See also: the ol' one-hitter...RIP) This is one of over a half dozen deletions of ""See also"" references to the One-hitter (smoking) article from various other articles, as if intending to isolate that article from readers and steer them toward joint-smoking instead. Note the apparently taunting editing statement. The same editor has repeatedly deleted from cannabis articles, including this one, (a) photos of small-dosage inhalant utensils which, properly operated, mostly vaporize rather than burn cannabinoids as compared with combustion-based ""joint"" smoking; (b) the Australian Department of Health warning against mixing with tobacco which can lead to ""unintended nicotine addiction"" (this ""traditional"" mixture is considered a prevalent meaning of the word ""joint"" in Europe and some other places, and children investigating cannabis get drawn into a life-shortening habit that has nothing to do with cannabis); (c) any references to articles on wikiHow.com which accurately describe how to make one's own dosage moderation utensils; (d) any possible text describing safer, more economical procedures of cannabis consumption than hot burning cigarette papers. (Not surprisingly the same editor, quoted above, has prosecuted this writer on Administrators' Noticeboard/Incidents for attempting to introduce such information.) Admittedly there is a shortage of really clear, descriptive photos of one-hitter utensils available from WikiCommons, and the ones used until now, here and on articles like Cannabis smoking and One-hitter (smoking), were not ideal. Editors are urged to find and supply illustrations that show (a) a really small crater 5.5 mm is best; (b) a long flexible drawtube so users can see what they are doing during the lighting process and get more vaporization, less combustion. The promise inherent in the title ""Cannabis consumption"" includes a duty to inform Wikipedia readers of utensils which (a) are cheaper in initial cost than a plug-in electric vaporizer, though the latter is best; (b) are safer to use and less wasteful of extremely expensive herbal material than cigarette paper; (c) can be made locally ""in your garage"" rather than purchased from monopoly corporations like Tops and Bugler; (d) can be used without adding tobacco (""Toke pure""), thus avoiding risk of ""unintended nicotine addiction"". "
0
0
0
0
0
0
f236b86a872cf561
Not trying to offend, I just meant use footnote/reflist 'machinery' moving forward. FYI: I looked in Howarth's book, but I don't find that term. I see it all the time in DOANFS-based articles.
0
0
0
0
0
0
f2381315e738f51a
Mark as resolved If you think the issue is closed then you should mark it as resolved then? (talk•contribs)
0
0
0
0
0
0
f23860b76b00fd72
" The matrices are correct; but not the matrix that is given on the cited angelfire.com page even though the way of derivation that is given there is correct. there only the ab prefactor of one term of c3 has to be removed. possible citation for the correct matrix: TABMathematical techniques in crystallography and material science / Edward Prince / Springer 1994 (see chapter ""metric tensor""). the definitions of the cited angelfire page are equal to the definitions here, there is just one error in calculus. by the way: no chemist is needed here. every scientist can proof these matrices to be correct. 129.69.120.176 "
0
0
0
0
0
0
f238dd0ee44a1cd6
, 3 February 2007 (UTC) If you don't think Zinn is a valid opinion, why did you restore the edit? 03:14
0
0
0
0
0
0
f239a587063c0a58
Inconsistent Notation It looks like this page uses in some places and in others.
0
0
0
0
0
0
f239a771c06a6eda
" There even is a second vandal posting ""in my name"": http://ws.arin.net/cgi-bin/whois.pl in this case gives OrgName: ThePlanet.com Internet Services, Inc. OrgID: TPCM Address: 1333 North Stemmons Freeway Address: Suite 110 City: Dallas StateProv: TX PostalCode: 75207 Country: US As this was given as the reason for my block I protest it. I also protest the admin not checking who posts at his page, although I admit I would not have thought of the possibility someone doing something that stupid either. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
f23b320ebed8949c
But I didn't plagiarise. Read the text I typed and the text in the website (which itself is biased in favour of Pakistani nationalism).
0
0
0
0
0
0
f23b40de9d0c8080
PS (thanks for fixing my blunder on user:Sharpshooter118118 - I returned to reblock and found you there - running to work in haste -)
0
0
0
0
0
0
f23b448ddc81df49
death would be seized by the state
0
0
0
0
0
0
f23b95a2f0d5a4bc
Are you sure you are a Kurd Sorry, but I think you are manioulating this website. It is funny how you focus on Iran. WHy do you not discuss Turkey and the terrible things they do to Kurds there. I think I know why.
0
0
0
0
0
0
f23bc8ed7f0fd3bc
I love you too, snookums )
0
0
0
0
0
0
f23cc2337184c2c2
" Yes there is. WP:ENG: ""Citations to non-English sources are allowed. However, because this is the English-language Wikipedia, English-language sources are preferred over non-English ones, whenever English sources of equal quality and relevance are available"". For general claims like that which has plenty of English language sources, English language sources are preferred. There is simply no need to use a Polish source for general statements about Fredericks rule. Polish sources are only preferable for subjects that lack English language sources, like perhaps specifics regarding Poland during his time. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
f23d1d28430d152c
" Impressive work! | talk to me "
0
0
0
0
0
0
f24049965dd21c08
Had it occurred to you that your soul-mate James D. Watson might be racially prejudiced? That's what the unscientific comments cherry-picked by you for Race and intelligence would suggest to the normal reader. Watson wasn't particularly professional with Rosalind Franklin either. Was her IQ substandard perhaps?
0
0
0
0
0
0
f2405495b493caf6
" WorldNet TPS Hi, It appears that you have deleted a page which I had created. The page was titled 'WorldNet TPS'. I feel it was unfairly deleted. The purpose of the page is to provide Wikipedia users with some background/history regarding WorldNet TPS. WorldNet is the second largest payment service provider in Ireland and it is important that web users who choose not to use the WorldNet website (worldnettps.com) can access information regarding the company on the most popular encyclopaedia in the world. I would like you to review your decision to delete the WorldNet TPS page. Kind Regards, Mark — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) The page was nominated for deletion as explained on your talk page because but it did not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant. There were no independent sources to establish notability. Please see Wikipedia:Your first article for guidance. talk Would these documents suffice as notability? — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) It's not really up to me to decide, although one of the links is a blog and another a press release so probably not. I didn't delete the article, I nominated it for deletion and an admin then reviewed it and deleted it. Check out the link I gave you above and if you think you can establish notability you can recreate the article - this time properly referenced or you can submit an Article for Creation so that it can be reviewed before being created. Please remember that Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia not to be used for promotion. talk By the way your note on the article's talk page suggests that you are editing on behalf of the organisation which means you may have a conflict of interest talk "
0
0
0
0
0
0
f2435850c1477b2d
" Congratulations on the succesful RfA! Happy mopping. - Talk? "
0
0
0
0
0
0
f243dbd35c846ca6
Captain Brock Space Badger article, rejected Hi Aggie Disappointed that my article was rejected but fully understand that there needs to be clear controls over what can be published. The article relates to a story which I will be publishing story. At that point I will be able to reference it to where the work is published. At that point, do you think it would have a better chance of being published? Kind regards Dez
0
0
0
0
0
0
f243fa9f2517bd06
At least they try to maintain a certain sense of objectivity ha, dont you think so?
0
0
0
0
0
0
f24513371ebb3eb2
Portsmouth City Public Schools
0
0
0
0
0
0
f247415d80c3010c
" Title Since there never were any ""talking dogs"" (Bondeson in the BBC article says that any evidence of dogs making progress was likely due to the Clever Hans effect) perhaps a title like Talking Dog Research in Nazi Germany would be better? "
0
0
0
0
0
0
f2493d996e1405b8
Commonwealth Realm Protected Status
0
0
0
0
0
0
f249c921fa8e74ea
Not true: [Resource Description Framework], [Web Ontology Language], [Rule Interchange Format]
0
0
0
0
0
0
f24a0fcc1f403334
yeah after few days some jews will say nasser al-kharafi is jew lol!
0
0
0
0
0
1
f24bf2870a0e2895
Can I just say that there is someone in the entry in the history of Guitar who removes any reference to Iran, because she says that Iran did not exist before the 20th century. Can a guitarist or music historian sort her out please.
0
0
0
0
0
0
f24d555894380714
"::Sorry... could you provide that link again, thanks. I'll also try and see what I can do with the xbox link - it's an interesting relation to gaming. Midorihana みどり "
0
0
0
0
0
0
f24e7e0270c8b320
Article on Sexual Orientation Thanks for the information you sent on signing edits, however, I had problems using it. Unfortunately, I did not sign my most recent changes because I could not find the place to add my signature. I have added three links I believe enrich the discussion on sexual orientation. All links regarding prostaglandins and sexual behavior/development are relevant to the discussion of whether sexual orientation is determined from birth. Moreover, the paper by Amateau and McCarthy the one by Sanders are of interest for raising the issue of epitestosterone's influence on brain gender and sex behavior. Recently, epitestosterone and the T/E ratio have received a great deal of attention in the press, and given that the upswing of endocrine research on homosexuals started with a paper that found significantly lowered excretion of testosterone and epitestosterone in homosexual men, the GLBT community should be aware of this research (see Endocrine Function in Male and Female Homosexuals, Loraine et al. 1970; and Sex Hormones and Male Homosexuality, Meyer-Bahlburg 1977).
0
0
0
0
0
0
f24ec3d0a100e576
I don't insist on anything aside from rescinding my donation and deleting my account. There was not a thing wrong with the text that I put on my own User page, I see how Wikipedia really is.
0
0
0
0
0
0
f24fcf9cddc99298
"Likewise Joe Davis' profile should be updated to say ""No one since has dominated the game like Joe and his like may never be seen again."" "
0
0
0
0
0
0
f2505ca7f5536660
Mucoid plaque nomination That was an excellent nomination on Mucoid plaque—one of the most thorough and complete nominations I have seen in several years on Wikipedia. I added a comment to remind people not to vote for deletion just because it is a fringe theory, but actually you said it well in your nomination. •
0
0
0
0
0
0
f251177602aeb0f5
" I got a new sig, and why do we need to argue? _123220px How do you like my signature? Thank you for all your help in designing it, _123220px Yeah right,  ►  "
0
0
0
0
0
0
f252a603ee604943
corrected barnstar is below
0
0
0
0
0
0
f25338390e9db12f
"::::I'm not going to do that - remember what happened last time I went to AN/I (you got blocked when I didn't want you to). If I go to AN/I, someone will see your latest unblock requests and feel that you're not dropping the stick, and you'll end up with talkpage removed. It's in your best interest to stay away for a few weeks, then maybe you can request an unblock. But I strongly recommend you wait a while. ~ -talk- "
0
0
0
0
0
0
f25561167816329b
This is about you, not about other users. You are very, very fast to apply tu quoque fallacies when you're called on your behaviour. I have advised several editors previously about the recommendations of the above-mentioned essay, and will advise others if I see them engaging in similar behaviour. Please consider the recommendation of Matthew 7:5.
0
0
0
0
0
0
f2559b2e75d6ca65
Then the ban will probably have to be made permanent. Your decision, admins. I had a sick feeling it would come to this. It always seems to, in this day and age. This will probably be declared my last wiki-edit by the administrators (and that's even if I'm allowed to put this on my Talk page), for I am compelled to believe that the administrators of Wikipedia will have to extend my ban permanently, not as a function of a Wikibreak, but as a function that I cannot exercise “good faith” in a consensus which does not care whether the information is accurate, verifiable, or even true. In fact, given the current state of Wikipedia, it is no longer sufficient nor even necessary to act in “good faith” and provide verifiable information. What is sufficient, and the only thing necessary, is to provide information the collective will accept as verified – note that I did not say “verifiable”. If the garbage I have to put up with like on almost every meaningful edit I've made in the last eight weeks is true, the collective has already spoken and I have no place on Wikipedia whatsoever, especially because I believe that the consensus is not only wrong, but either flagrantly mis-informed or down-right stupid. This stands in violation of basically all five pillars of Wikipedia. First, Wikipedia is NOT an encyclopedia as long as the general public is allowed to edit it, but only in the form in which a collective will accept. I will give a good example of this in the first real problem I ran in to about 6-8 weeks ago: BCS National Championship Game. I tried a number of edits to properly represent the BCS' nullification of the participation of USC in two illegal Championship Games, and removing their designation, since the games no longer are believed to have taken place. http://www.bcsfootball.org/news/story?id=6632189 An edit war began on that subject, and the subject of Wikipedia's rules regarding “no damnatio memoriae came up. I proposed, and repeatedly, that the concept of damnatio memoriae applied, since that was the exact penalty imposed by the BCS when they nullified the entire participation of USC in the 2005 Orange Bowl and 2006 Rose Bowl (pages (along with USC's entire 2005 season, nullified by the NCAA beforehand) I would've deleted eight weeks ago under encyclopedic verification, but we now have a conflict between damnatio memoriae and encyclopedic verification). AND, since Wikipedia does not respect the BCS as a sanctioning body (trying to remain neutral – I'll get to that in a moment in part two!), Wikipedia accepts as valid USC's 14 vacated victories, including in a BCS National Championship Game which no longer logistically should exist. Hence, Wikipedia recognizes (in the form that they won the 2005 Orange Bowl) USC as the BCS National Champion – if Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and their participation in the 2006 Rose Bowl, which was also nullified by the BCS. Ergo, we now have a non-encyclopedic, non-verifiable situation which is, in fact, false! Only the sanctioning body can give sanction to the event, and only the sanctioning body can take it away. (Remember this one for later, as well!) I had respected the decision of “no damnatio memoriae, but can do so no longer, because of the fact that it creates an encyclopedic falsehood! And because the collective accepts “no damnatio memoriae, even in cases where it applies, we now have to change one of the hardest and fastest rules on Wikipedia, on every editing page. Encyclopedic content must only be considered verified by the collective. That is all, and also that is the only acceptable basis for content on Wikipedia – actual encyclopedic verification is no longer sufficient nor necessary. Anything short of that will be removed by the collective. If I am reinstated, I am considering removal of all mentions of vacated participation in games. That means the 2005 Orange and 2006 Rose Bowls go, as does their mentions in BCS National Championship Game, as well as USC's entire 2005 season page, replaced with notations of the nullifications. Any other games where the participation of one or both schools are removed also go as well. (As one example, the 2011 Sugar Bowl may also be deleted, if the NCAA or BCS nullifies specifically Ohio State's participation in the event.) That dovetails nicely into debunking pillar number two: If the collective is the sole basis for acceptability on Wikipedia, then Wikipedia cannot be neutral. In fact, when the collective is mis-informed and prejudicial, on top of being inaccurate, this redoubles that, since the collective enforces the rules, Wikipedia is not at all neutral, but written with the biases of the collective in mind. An example
0
0
0
0
0
0
f2566b3101a9a1f4
Oh you mean to gain consensus? Explain actions? Like you and your friends did with the article? You're right, I should spend 15 more seconds explaining myself than you did.
0
0
0
0
0
0
f256b26ed0653cb6
You're a total fag. Pokemon netbattle is some awesome fucking shit, and you're a goddamn cunt for not realizing it. You fucking chose to delete it because of some bullshit reason that it's not significant enough when compared to your high standards of significance. YOU'RE THE INSIGNIFICANT FUCK MOTHER FUCKER! Fuck your lame shit. My pokemon will rape you.
1
1
1
0
1
0
f258800d1ca26476
But this is not simply words, as the Lord's Prayer is coherent text. talk
0
0
0
0
0
0
f259ba599efcd512
My bad, the orientation is obvious from the Soft Master's narrative in issue 26.
0
0
0
0
0
0
f25ae34f2e14de13
Jatts in Islamic history Hi, I added this section to the article: Jatts in Islamic History unfortunately some Hindus don't agree and claim I am making this up, despite this being mentioned in a number of books. Our Hindu friend Hakler is unnecessarily tagging the article and asking for (citations) when the citations are there. I don't understand why Bahamians so love to write about Jatt history, when Jatts are called all sorts of degrading names in their 'holy' scriptures.
0
0
0
0
0
0
f25d0439b93ba20c
DOnt you think it is equally bad that Muslims are rioting and destroying property over this. Islam is a religion of peace and tolerance. these acts of violence are equally reprehensible to Islam as the cartoons. REALIZE WHAT YOU ARE DOING. the world is watching act like muslims, not like undisciplined individuals.
0
0
0
0
0
0
f25dcc8d44dee004
Diocese of South Carolina Hi again. I hope you are enjoying Wikipedia. You've continued to make edits to the lead section that are not verified by any citation. Editors are discussing the article on its talk page, and it would be nice if you'd join us rather than make unilateral edits that do not adhere to Wikipedia's policies, WP:No Original Research, WP:Verifiability, and WP:Reliable Sources. Thanks and once again welcome to Wikipedia!
0
0
0
0
0
0
f25df6dd05412c53
asteroid colonization i am curreently doing research on colonizing asteroids and so far i have come up with a huge amount of money that will be needed to get there. and i am not even finished caculated the costs,i am talking hundereds of millions of dollars. if anyone has any i deas what woould happen if we did colonize an asteroid. please feel free to add any coments
0
0
0
0
0
0
f25e3ce6807c2041
":::: Are they as ""reliable"" as Dreifuss' one-day newspapers were? Lehitraot, jehudon, we know your dirty jehudon tactics all too well and won't be fooled that easily. And no, you jews weren't considered as publishing this document, it was overheard. And yes, I've seen the difference between the eyes of jews in Odessa and Jerusalem with my very own eyes. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
f264068d1f545abe
Paoli Dam Here the whole article has been rewritten, expanded except the filmography table and the infobox! Does it pas DYK criteria? (contact)
0
0
0
0
0
0
f264dee8a1ba5672
Regnerus Study: Criticism Previous versions of this article unnecessarily multiplied references to criticism of the New Family Structures Study. First of all, this article is ostensibly about the Witherspoon Institute, not the New Family Structures Study, and it does not make sense to devote so much space to one study in what is otherwise a small article about an organization that has done many other things, as mentioned in the earlier paragraphs. Further, there is already a reference to the fact that the Study received criticism, down toward the end of the article. That same sentence also refers to the fact that many scholars also voiced praise for the Study, and thereby gives much more balance than the earlier discussion of criticism. The fact remains that the Study was published by a peer-reviewed journal and was conducted at a major research university that has not condemned it. Some people voiced concerns to the same university that the study had not been conducted properly and the university found that the concerns did not merit further scrutiny. This Study has received the same vetting that countless other academic studies have received, including ones that came to very different conclusions. In short, previous representations of criticism in this article about this Study were unnecessarily long, presented the Study in a very biased light, and made this article into a forum for voicing opinions that is properly handled in the academy through the methods of peer review and institutional review that the Study already passed. By ignoring those very processes of review such discussion does a disservice to Wikipedia's readers and suggests that the critics have a problem with the academic review processes as such, not the New Family Structures Study itself.
0
0
0
0
0
0
f266ec129cad768f
" Misleading text The article states: ""Defending national champion Kentucky was omitted from the field of 68, becoming the first reigning champion to be denied the opportunity to defend its championship in a season in which it was eligible for the tournament since North Carolina in 2010."" The beginning of the sentence makes it seem like it's rare or a big deal for the national champion to not make the tournament. And then the end of the sentence makes it clear that it's only been three years. Someone should probably fix that."
0
0
0
0
0
0
f2683eb64049741b
While I remain unconvinced that I've broken any policies in spirit, perhaps I should explain that I've been acting with the frustration of one falsely accused and the disillusionment of one having the Wikipedian ideals abased and defaced before his eyesaggressively by one user, and passively by the rest. A quick glance at my edit log shows that I have scarce made a contribution to Wikipedia in days, other than to defend some actions, deny others, and, in short, to feed a troll. is in need of professional helpmost likely a nannyand I haven't enough free time to provide it unpaid. If it is the will of the community, I'll allow him (I'm assuming him) to reach emotional maturity gradually, and on his own.
0
0
0
0
0
0
f268a6aab0fa40ef
" ""If the use of flags in a list, table or infobox makes it unclear, ambiguous or controversial, it is better to remove the flags even if that makes the list, table or infobox inconsistent with others of the same type where no problems have arisen."" Yes it also says discourage but the rest say put it in. 194.66.216.40 "
0
0
0
0
0
0
f268d848dedecc12
Stand your ground Less than half of states have stand-your-ground, and decisional law has been distinguishing past precedent as to trend to eliminate the use of self-help rather than to expand it. A citation from 1960 would not support your claim that post enlightenment society has since reverted to 12th-century common law, quite the contrary.
0
0
0
0
0
0
f26a173def05dd01
Simpler example I just posted a simpler example to Talk:Continuation of implementing threading with call/cc. The problem with the example in this article is that its hard to read: it mashes up (confuses) the job-dispatching queue with the fork/yield concepts. The Talk:Continuation separates the two, making the code both easier to read, and also making it clear how to write a general job scheduler, (which has nothing at all to do with call/cc). Exception handling This aricle should also provide an example of implementing exception handling with call/cc.
0
0
0
0
0
0
f26a90e0ef3ab777
" They're removed now. Since I added them in the top sentence, they are unneeded in the ""See also"" internal links. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
f26abbe14493929f
Aquí se hablan IPA Greetings, ! As I'm a reprobate IPA dropout from waaaaay back who's trying halfheartedly to recover some of my prior fluency,* it occurred to me you might like this gentle guide if you haven't yet tried it. Take your time; it starts falling into place after a while. *Favorite IPA application since graduation: annotating choral lyrics in foreign languages aided by a native speaker, then correcting the pronunciation of my section mates during choir rehearsals.
0
0
0
0
0
0
f26d7e5ea23f35f9
Name Origin All the sources I can find state that the county was named for the division from Williams County. I have been unable to find anything to confirm the other reasons given in the introduction. They seem like sensible and logical explanations, but if anyone can come up with a useable reference that confirms the information, that would be really great.
0
0
0
0
0
0
f26dbe7af0702887
What are your thoughts to adding Commons images (if available) for each of the main cast sections now? (Maybe recurring too?) The layout is more conducive now to have them, and I feel like we should come up with a consensus before an IP or non-regular editor comes and adds them. -
0
0
0
0
0
0
f26dddd5f1a92e21
"::::::::::I don't see how you can claim consensus when it appears that you are the only editor in support of your change. The comma issue is separate from your push to impose changes which stand in the face of the long agreed-upon version of the lead. ~ (talk|contribs) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
f26e8f3435ccc2c0
It should stay as is, his Armenian background is irrelevant here.198.228.200.143
0
0
0
0
0
0
f26f558679aa308d
dick face go fuck your dick
1
0
1
0
1
0
f27384caf6cd4370
REDIRECT Talk:Life As We Know It (TV Show)
0
0
0
0
0
0
f275ea791156619b
But at least you are honest enough to admit that you have zero respect for other editors. I admire that honesty. 41.241.73.254
0
0
0
0
0
0
f27702526fbad293
This game probably isin't even all that great
0
0
0
0
0
0
f278b8b891f1fad3
Thanks again for your attention. I filled out the information in the link you provided. Since this user has caused problems in the past, I wanted to let you know in advance that I have taken some source material on another page that had expired citations, condensed the information through careful edits, and have spent hours making certain that all of the citations are valid and follow wikipedia guidelines. I just wanted to let you know this now, in case another problem arises. Is there someone who I can get take a look at it or make appropriate changes so that the edit will not be blocked in case a user attempts to tear it down again.
0
0
0
0
0
0