id
stringlengths 16
16
| comment_text
stringlengths 6
5k
| toxic
int64 0
1
| severe_toxic
int64 0
1
| obscene
int64 0
1
| threat
int64 0
1
| insult
int64 0
1
| identity_hate
int64 0
1
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
f62479d4ecbb0df2 | Being sorry is no use. Just don't do it. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f6255f5401143bba | I don't mind seeing the images. I'm more likely to recognise someone from their image than I am their name. How do they make the table harder to read? Clicking on their name is all well and good except that those people reading this article from a piece of paper can't do that (and I'm sure there'll be a lot of schools printing out pages of this article for the kids). An image isn't the same as unnecessary information such as birthdays or universities. In what way do you find the table harder to read? (talk • contribs • email) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f625de2b79535589 | ":Thank you! Sometimes I do get a little bit carried away however. Not hard to believe regarding all the insults and name slandering I have to endure from this guy (Peter Lee)... But, I will try to work as much as possible in a Wikipedia way and listen to all the advice you and JeremyA gave me...
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f62778553129cdba | Nothing personal Rod, but you really are a stupid turd | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
f627b4a4c0d8069b | "
Images
I am sorry you had all this trouble with images. In Wikipedia, m:Comyright paranoia is pervasive and some users enjoy harassing others about images since the pretense of doing so to protect the Foundation gives them a perception of impunity while in many cases it would take less than a minute to simply retag the image uploaded by an inexperienced uses with the tag. Anyway, I will watch your talk page and when I see you being warned about some image I will take a look to see whether it can be saved from deletion. But even if you are unsure about copyright, please always provide the image source. It will make preserving it a whole lot easier. Happy edits,
An Automated Message from
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you!
Image copyright problem with Image:Vepr.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Vepr.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Wikipedia:Image use policy
Wikipedia:Image copyright tags
This is an automated notice by . For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
Regarding images
Hi Bogdan. Regarding this your talk message: you can use the image request templates for filing standard images requests that will be automatically put to the respective category. I'd even ask you to do so. I requested that category to be populated: we need thousands of images on UA-related pages, so potential photographers (mappers etc.) need a consistent to-do list.
And talking about images: I think placing our national flag next to ""the page looks bad"" text on your userpage was a bad idea. Cheers,
Alright.
Award
Military barnstar For contributions related to Ukrainian military and particularly Air Force ranks and insignia of Ukraine (discuss)
Wow, thanks! Although I'm honored to have received my first award, I have to say that I expected one after I finished the Air Force, Navy, Ground forces series P. Thanks again!
Only happy to recognize the work you do, better late than never. Will be keeping an eye in the future not to miss other great contributions by Counterstrike69 a.k.a. Bogdan. Best regards, (discuss)
Lukashenko
I think what happened at is that someone tried to introduce a photo of Lukashenko without uploading it to Wikipedia (which isn't technically possible). I been looking for a free photo of President Lukashenko, but had not have much luck yet. User:Zscout370 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f62a9bae6cde3803 | ":Could everyone try to calm down and focus on the main objective - trying to improve the Madonna article. I sincerely believe that's what everyone is trying to do, but approaching it from different directions. The ""Queen of Pop"" thing is not the biggest problem here. There's a sentence in the article that describes Madonna as one of the most important people in the history of the world. Really, that kind of overstatement does her a disservice. She's made an incredible, unique contribution to pop music, culture etc but that's barely acknowledged in favor of a bunch of meaningless praise. Can we please look at the entire article, and rather than give examples such as Bette Midler, which is not a particularly good article, please compare it to the various singers, actors, performers etc who are the subjects of featured articles. There are numerous ""bad"" articles that we could use as a rationale for the development of the Madonna article but I would prefer to draw inspiration from the best articles rather than the mediocre. There is some justification for the ""Divine Miss M"" reference. She was actually known by that moniker early in her career as it was a character she created and for a time she was that character on and off-stage. Her stage show and album used the same name - it was a strong connection. Maybe not strong enough for the lead sentence, but it doesn't compare with the media created ""Queen of Pop"" tag.
Once again I draw your attention to WP:LEAD. Please take a few moments to read it so that we can at least try to tackle this from the same angle instead of all this bickering, which is doing nothing but harm. Nothing should be in the lead section that is not in the article because the lead is meant to be a summary of the article. If the ""Queen of Pop"" reference is so important, please discuss it in the article so it at least has some context. ""She's commonly called ""Queen of Pop"". Big deal - what does that mean? There's no attempt to place it into any context, there's no meaning, no explanation. Please try to keep personal opinions aside and use WP guidelines to approach the article objectively. Wikipedia:What is a featured article? is also full of useful tips on what to aim for. This used to be a featured article (believe it or not), and there's no reason it can't be again.
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f62aaf5ac0eb6bbc | "
Ah, yes, here's the MastCell edit, through full protection:. IMHO, the Weekly Standard is perfectly adequate sourcing. I would have preferred it be explicitly credited in the text as the origin for the claim (which turned out to be true) that ""no evidence exists..."" but the fact that it's cited for that claim would seem to obviate the necessity of the edit. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f62c474ec1628813 | "
Thanks so much for asking, . I know I often come off as a douche, and I've been fixing that, mainly by following your example. So just so i'm glasslike: I really am grateful for how you've treated me since November, in this, my third attempt in 10 years, to withstand our ""battlefield""-hardened Wikipedian culture. War is seductive. i was twice seduced, then repelled, by our ""war"" games. This time, I'm here to stay, thanks to good Wikipedians like you. And i'm changing the way i play the game. Instead of rejoining our Competitive games (which only boys, mainly, love), from now on I'll be playing only Cooperative games, which both girls (and some boys), normally, do enjoy.
Now back to praising you: You could have simply done to me what too many other powerful Wikipedians do: with 2 clicks, undo the ~1 wo/man-week of work my friends and I invested into the Cooperation Index and 3d2do designs. Side note: we designed those mechanisms specifically for the inactive Community & Kindness projects that we adopted back in November. Our premise is this: systemic bias and other dysfunctions within the Wikipedia Community are but symptoms of diseases which have rendered our Community moribund for almost a decade. But we did agree that the Gender Gap among Wikipedians is the most shameful of these symptoms, so our first application of the Cooperative design is meant to end - and quickly - the gender bias among Wikipedians.
also expressed some major concerns, in a note to me via the Gender Gap list.
I've got two unmovable deadlines today in the extra-wiki world (so annoying, that) but I'll be back ASAY to address each of your points, at the Project's Talk page: Wikipedia Talk:WikiProject Countering systemic bias/Gender gap task force/3D2Do
Thank you both. In Community, i remain, truly yours,
Mabuhay! - LoRETta/ " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f62fdf155fc71110 | Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - Boy | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f63217c2f2aa03d8 | "Otherwise, please point out the ""personal attack"". " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f632516584529e71 | " Sorry for making a comment, but I was on this talk page, and I notice you say your entire ISP was blocked. There must have been a LOT of people vandalising or something, because if everyone that uses an ISP gets blocked? ""Yeah, im with Charter, and my entire ISP just got blocked. Did Charter do something wrong?"" Just seems a little odd if you ask me.
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f6341a610fd95c3b | How the Hell does fighting him at Memory's Skyscraper or his fighting style clarify something as ambigious as darkness? That's what I mean by clarification. Defying gravity doesn't mean they use gravity; when I jump, I defy gravity, but that hardly means I can control it. (Feeling chatty? ) (Edits!) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f6369a4e64e3d117 | Translatin, Please!
Dear Fellow Wikipedians,
Although the introduction was in English, the summaries of each episode are in Slovak. Please call a Slovakian who is well-versed in English to translat this page.
Regards,
Yahya Al-Shiddazi (World-renown retired WikiVandalizer)
Known for his hillarious yet clean sense of humor
Known for excessive vandalism
Known for occaisional moments of helpfulness, such as right now ;) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f63725da5e58bcbf | ": You really haven't bothered look at this properly, have you? I was tidying up my talk page. I was not ""throwing foul language at other users"". And you have absolutely no reason to believe ""it's extremely likely you'll do it again if unblocked early"". Can you point to *any* incivilty from me off my own talk page, which is the only one you've left me access to?
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f6373d1c27d4eb51 | "
I see from the article that this particular angle isn't covered. Thus not ""Forum-talkin'""? 109.189.210.119 " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f6377ec550c8be04 | That's an extremely selective quotation from the nutshell text. The essay (which I originally wrote, so I'm pretty familiar with it) gives three basic check points to verify whether it's likely that an xkcd reference is helpful: this reference meets none of them. It is at best a trivial and non-free illustration of an SQL injection attack, which has its own article anyway. People are prone to arguing that a given xkcd strip provides some unique insight into a subject when this is usually extremely subjective. Were this actually the case for a given reference then one would imagine that some third party would pick up on this in a reliable source. That hasn't happened here, so it seems like nothing more than one Wikipedia editor's personal judgement. WP:EL specifically notes when external links are appropriate and again this link doesn't meet those guidelines as applied to the rest of the encyclopedia. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f638993d0fbc725f | "
Edit warring at Jonathan Wild
I don't understand why you edit war with me to insert a non-link under ""External links"" in Jonathan Wild. Please either stop it or explain your action on the talkpage or in your edit summary. | talk ." | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f63e42f149ae8dce | Thanks for experimenting with the page Rocket Power on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. wat's sup | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f63ecd0a6e90a9c3 | Lycodon extinct?
Hi, Lycodon jara, a pet of mine, has its genus missing from your List of snakes. Please post me details of the tragedy -( . Regards, | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f63f6570a90208cb | Road speed?
Side says road speed: 58. Is that Km/H? Artcle says 36 MPH which converts to 58 Km/h so just wondering, not sure | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f63f6a0f8ab883ff | Thanks, Canderson7. I'm not concerned, though. | Talk | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f6405045c497fb09 | "==Image:Haozhihua.jpg==
The image was licensed as ""for non-commercial use only"" or ""used with permission"" which is not free enough to allow it to beused on wikipedia. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f6413a48238c71e7 | get fucking lost i know you are sad but keep it to yourself | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
f6416e9d81704f8d | 2014 (UTC)
Objection to removal of text in real prices and ideal prices article
I object strongly that you have removed chunks of text, without proper explanation and discussion of your reasons, in the real prices and ideal prices article. It seems as though you are on an ideological campaign to cut stuff out of articles which you happen to think is rubbish. You have to prove it is rubbish, not simply autocratically remove material because it doesn't fit with your ideology. You are not an expert on this topic, so tread carefully and discuss your proposed changes. 19:14, 31 May | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f64317865c096778 | "
I think we should list it as ""inactive""
Encyclopedia Dramatica's homepage stated this:
Due to hosting costs,Encyclopedia Dramaticamay not have long to live...
Please join and use WhatPort80 and help make it into a quality, safe-for-work alternative, created and maintained by the community.
Perhaps we should list it as such. | Contact the Council " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f6470347276f7c2b | Me'ad
Do you know if there's any difference between the Shiia belief in Me'ad and the belief in Qiyamah? Could we merge these pages? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f6472ac8fcb1ffe2 | I don't believe that the ingredients list provides a breakdown of where the sugars come from. I have nothing against listing the amount of sugars, once it is noted that the proportion listed refers to the amount in one particular country, rather than claiming to represent nutella worldwide. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f647a53f52405eab | "Thank you for experimenting with the page Image:World Cup 2006 logo.png on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. (CONTACT ME) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f649baa4893c8a61 | Not gone yet
Why does it say 'dissipated'? It's still snowing. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f64ab381d9488658 | "
As I expected. The self-righteous editor smug in the moral authority declares ""this is not a debate"". There is no defense or recourse for the lowly anonymous contributor who must tolerate censorship. Ironically speaking out against censorship apparently is justification for removal of editing privileges. Since I am new to Wikipedia could you instruct me on how to file a complaint for abuse of administrator privileges with the goal of seeking your dismissal?" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f64d908aa24f51e0 | So that you know
This is a computer in a school, to which students have public access. This is probably the reason there have been problems with vandalism from this IP address. I imagine that other computers in the school have similar IPs, and a similar history of vandalism, though I do not know the network architecture, so I'm just guessing.
I am not sure what your policy is for dealing with situations like this, but I thought it might be useful to let this fact be known.
-A concerned Wikipedian and student | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f64ff029aa437a32 | Do you like to wear adult diapers for fun? I do. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f64fffde2868996d | No I have no affiliation - found the website after reading BBC News (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-19813382).
http://defensedistributed.com/products/ specifically talks about manufacturing an AR-15.
Whether they are commercial / advocacy / non-profit seems irrelevant. If they publish information relevant to wiki topic then can it not be used a reference?..
If a third party article described a method of milling the lower receiver of an AR-15 at home then it too could be referenced.
The project's key focus appears to be circumventing legislation and they use the AR-15 as a specific example. The Wikipedia page lists the manufacturers and then goes on to detail, at length, the global legislation controlling the distribution of the AR-15. Both these sub heading seem directly effected and relevant to the referenced article. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f6522481a97bbf87 | REDIRECT Talk:Rock Island Railroad Bridge (Columbia River) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f652d55e76590af0 | "::Nobody has accused you of being libellous that I've seen, nor have they called you a liar. The reason that you were cautioned about your behaviour on the Anita Sarkeesian talkpage is that you were using the space, not to propose improvements to the page, but to criticise the person that it's about. Wikipedia takes this very seriously because the whole site can be found responsible for things that editors like you and I say, even if it's not in article space. For this reason, biographies of living people are taken very seriously, and come under the most scrutiny of any Wikipedia articles. Here is the appropriate policy, it's vital that you read it if you want to edit articles about living people.
With regard to the Anita Sarkeesian article, if there are specific additions that you want to make to it, please suggest those on the talkpage. ""She's a liar"" is insufficient, you need to find a notable source whose content you want to add. This policy details how we determine what sources are notable.
At the end of the day, though, whatever you believe, Wikipedia is going to describe the positions and opinions of a lot of people you disagree with. That doesn't mean that Wikipedia endorses those points of view, simply that they are notable people whose statements and actions are worth documenting here. At least until you get a bit of experience, I strongly recommend you stick to uncontroversial topics, or BLPs of people whom you agree with.
You must clearly be blind take a second look at the very top of this page and you'll see a link to libel on it. Its even in t≈he very first sentence, please inform me if that was too complex for you to understand? hell I qoute it for you since this is obviously to complex. Also answer the question I asked stop writing on my talk page.
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f652ea56a90c79da | "
Cease and Desist
Bwilkins, would you please immediately cease all interaction with me, other than for official purposes. You have exceeded your remit as a administrator and have violated WP:INVOLVED. I will be posting at AN/I soon regarding your block of me, and revocation of talkpage access, ensuring I ""kept quiet"".
Thank you. ★★★★ " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f65325238bffad59 | "
I happen to agree. It's a non-standard word, more or less invented to sound intelligent. So, if the word were real, what you'd be saying is that the purpose of the article is to NOT recap the Genesis record etc. etc. The actual word you want is ""irrespective of anyone's belief,"" because even ""regardless"" makes no sense. ""Irregardless"" has no meaning in English, and is approximately equivalent to ""ain't"". I used to laugh when flammable liquids had a big bold warning that said, ""Inflammable."" In the desire to make words sound more important than they really are, we've actually created worthless words. Talk• Contributions " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f654651701dcfa94 | Support – it is better to omit the honorific. — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f656006d6fa22a7a | "
Sentence in ""Ergot Theory""
I'm not really satisfied with this sentence ""A new study has shown that a primitive form of LSD was infecting the wheat supply on one side of the village. "" First off, what study? There is no reference cited so this could be some wackos study or it could be something reputable. Also, the sources I've cited in the rest of this section were all discussing RYE not wheat. This is the lone sentence about wheat and I have no idea whether ergot (which I assume is what is meant by ""a primitive form of LSD"") on wheat does the same as ergot on rye. I propose the sentence be edited out unless it can be expanded by citing some verifiable study. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f65705ec06812e32 | Hey Jeremy!
FUCK YOU!!! AND FUCK YOU ALAN! Good to know you mother fuckng pussies protect each other. Get a lfie with your empty threats you fucking faggot, you fucking stickingyour bare unprotected dicks within each other's assholes. FUCK YOU cocksucker!
Scratch my asshole and condensate the moisture from my dirty rectum onto the roof of your mouth then give me head. | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
f6577d9901d58c67 | All you've done here is ignore my points and restate your unsubstantiated claim that the information is 'trivial' in your edit summary. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f6593b31a5442571 | I like it when somebody declares an intent to edit-war by way of making accusations of edit warring in an article that has been protected due to edit warring. That's sweet. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f65bac0f36215311 | Ofcourse there is! But this page is for public transport not general transport. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f65cf1122af2296e | No History section?
History of the Earth would be a much needed addition. '''' | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f65d42cf56793c43 | "
That was a neat rhetorical sleight of hand, wasn't it? I'm not trying to base the contents of an article on what ""we all know""; I'm calling you out on a disingenuous analogy. If you really think there's no more coverage of fascism or of rape in scholarly sources than there is of donkey punches, I will cheerfully provide you with the titles of fifty published books on each. There's a difference between basing encyclopedia content on what ""we all know"", and using what ""we all know"" to make a point in a conversation. I hope you can see that. What I'm pointing out is that fascism and rape are clearly extremely citeable, whereas donkey punch isn't. With proper sourcing, the donkey punch article will not be deleted, no matter how much people hate it. Unless someone is deleting properly sourced articles based on distaste, your analogy goes nowhere. As for myself, I've argued for deleting articles I like a lot, based on the fact that no verifiable sources could be found for their contents, so don't tell me why I'm ""picking on"" this article. I actually take the position I do because I really like WP:NOR. - " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f65d9a6927f3e2f3 | I'm afraid I can't verify it as his myspace account has been deleted
I fucking hate you. Honestly. | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f65dacaca9693731 | Pee-wee's Playhouse
The content on Pee-wee's Playhouse was added by a vandal who put it there to make fun of Paul Reubens being gay. Read the removed content closely. I watch the show and never has he acted that way. Please remove it and unblock the IP as I am now using Tor and this IP should be blocked (but not that one. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f65f1b52574920ac | "
Well, this account could probably be blocked as the name of a group and the creator's purpose only seemed to be for promotional purposes. talk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f65f60f874161f54 | Please stop being smug and supply me with a real answer concerning my ban. | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f65fc8a149dbd44d | WP:FILM April 2011 Newsletter
The April 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. Happy editing! (talk • contrib) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f660358e3c07d3cd | MCR Announce finishing new album and i brought you my bullets film
should be under recent happenings | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f6606dff12ba3711 | You're doing good work! Have a great weekend. Best wishes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f663fab796eff972 | "
Ok, how would you feel about a voluntary 1RR restriction? (Not enforceable, just on your honor.) ~ " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f6652e3dc70cc464 | Article title?
I get Wikipedia's willingness to be politically correct, but this person was born a man. What is the rationale for using the girl name he gave himself, as opposed to using the birthname God gifted him? 74.58.27.35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f667f6294431837f | Done
Thanks for the tip - that's what I just did. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f66caa1ad1f173ce | Writing biographies
If you want to create a biography, please first read WP:BLP and follow the guidance there. Don't put 'Dr' in front of his name, by the way, as it will only be removed per our guidelines. After your read that, see Wikipedia:Article wizard. As it advises, do a bit of editing first. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f66d66c53ee92fb3 | The 2009 American Music Awards photo will be used until I get a WireImage account. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f66e752cb40d7193 | .
20.25 4/9/04 - The link for Territorial Army is given at the top of the page. Hammersfan | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f66fe018743c005d | "
Transliteration
Would anyone with a knowledge of Ukrainian/Russian transliteration into English go through this article and ensure consistency with our guidelines? These are WP:UKROM and WP:RUROM? It is getting a bit confusing, with Aleksandrs and Alexanders, Andreis and Andreys, &c.; It would be much appreciated. — ☎ " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f66fe6b43153a133 | " 2009 (UTC)
The7thdr: the reasons were several - and you're not going to like them. 1) Tony Blair was a war-mongerer who was not in the slightest bit interested in stability or peace. having such a person as a Prime Minister was a seriously bad idea. 2) not quite in exactly these words, but close to it, Maharishi stated that if the UK population was so stupid as to vote in a war-mongerer, then they were not welcome to benefit from the stabilising effects of TM. 3) on the basis that evil tends to become more obvious when there is less stabilising to counteract it, Maharishi ordered everyone OUT of the country, or to get as fast as possible into Vaastu (spiritual-protecting) homes. 4) in this way, Maharishi surmised that the UK population would, thick as two xxxxing short planks as it was (overall - not all of it, obviously), be able to get through its stupid thick collective head that there was something desperately wrong with its leaders, much quicker and much more obviously than if the TM meditators were ""accidentally"" stabilising the country. 5) additionally, TM practitioners, by leaving the country, would not be subjected to quite so much stress. The7thdr: you should by now be going ""oh. ah. um. err. i see."" and perhaps now have a clearer idea of why it would be inappropriate to put such a description onto the page which describes the ""Transcendental Meditation Technique"" rather than describing ""The History Of The Transcendental Meditation Movement"", yes? 21:31, 6 April" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f6700e5d229eb782 | "
Wikipedia:Article Creation and Improvement Drive/History/Entry →Toth " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f673f15e3c472970 | "
Explain
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Princess_Marina_of_Greece_and_Denmark&oldid;=prev&diff;=648322927 - '''' " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f6742e1f595edb8c | "
Would a foreman send one of his workers or colleagues to the corner for a ""timeout session"" for caring too deeply about his work? A chef? A general? What about a racist, self-inflated bureaucrat? I'd heard that Wikipedia was no place for diversity, either of pigmentation or of interpretation, but until now I, despite being a member of two oppressed minorities, have until now never felt that way. I said I was disillusioned; now, it seems, I am disenfranchised as well. I suggest that you get off my encyclopedia and continue your edits in a more appropriate medium. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f6743bd7a71e6016 | "
Hi Wikipedia is not to be trusted at all. The truth always gets edited out by the prejudices of the majority. The editors also have a lot of power to determine what version of the ""truth"" they want to present. Any facts that do not conform to their prejudices are deemed ""bias"" or ""opinions"". It is not a reliable source, but just for leisure." | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f674b20f045feb4f | "
Don't worry, I read with great care when I come across nonsense. You have persisted with speculation, and continue to distract the discussion by not addressing the counterarguments and instead asking peripheral questions about things I've said which really don't need clarification. Either you have reliable sources documenting that the website is a hoax, or you need to concede and let the thread rest. I never intended to respond more than once to that thread, but you kept asking side questions or presenting the same baseless argument. • talk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f67592771bb87cd5 | We should point out her filthy political philosophy
Who gives a damn if she's shagging some toyboy? We should be pointing out that she believes homosexuals deserve instantaneous and painful death, much like in Uganda. | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
f679a1fd2663bdfb | "
Welcome to Wikipedia
Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Wikipedia is one of the world's fastest growing internet sites. We aim to build the biggest and most comprehensive encyclopaedia in the world. To date we have over four million articles in a host of languages. The English language Wikipedia alone has over one million articles! But we still need more! Please feel free to contribute your knowledge and expertise to our site.
If you need help see:
Help contents - the main help page.
Quick guide - a ""cheatsheet"" listing the main editing commands.
Here are a few more good links for newcomers:
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Tutorial
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using three tildes (~~~), or four (~~~~) if you want date stamp; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! talk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f67b270be44f516a | Mop using the mop.
Thanks for the admin mop on the 2a article. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f67b3767740afd66 | Talkback
This is your 12th RfA question. 103.6.159.179 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f67b3af2b773f288 | "
Speedy deletion of Randy Johnson - Director
A tag has been placed on Randy Johnson - Director, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD G12.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. - (Talk to me) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f67b5bdd16e7ba94 | Basically, this editor is just making mountain out of a molehill. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f67dcf995ba3bd56 | Also, if you can think of a nickname to be called by because someone can't remember your IP address, feel free to give one. 21:46, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f67edd9c9473e8e1 | Fuck you
fred fuck you you bitch ass punk u can suck a dick deleting everything fuck you ho go to hell you dumbass. your a bitch you stupid ass motherfucker. put a big stick in your mouth and leave. | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
f67fb3fbfe03f0e1 | Bešker edits CW so he is in a conflict of interest. Budak's statement that Nitko nije radio ozbiljnu analizu hrvatske Wikipedije is false in the light of a recent study that has been added to the article. Budak's statement that dojam je da je taj broj devijantnih članaka vrlo mali u odnosu na ukupnu hrvatsku Wikipediju i da to nije neki ozbiljniji problem Wikipedije is subjective and thus worthless. What is small according to him? Even few % amounts to thousands of articles. The argument was never that CW was in general unreliable and revisionist - only in articles dealing with problematic parts of Croatian history and identity. Given that Budak doesn't seem to have inspected the issue thoroughly or even read the disputed articles, and that his remarks are in vague and general terms, his opinion should be discarded as well. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f681a301153e6688 | The pic is here [] if it's any use, I didn't put it in the article as I know you take much better pics than I do -) which is not difficult. When I was teaching anything lavatorial was a great way of getting the kids interested -( | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f681a9b81a9acfd6 | Merge
No Merger: the article is an independent topic with potential to expand, which is all that is required. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f681d0a8accd29b1 | Hello.
So like a month back I wasn't behaving like this society expected me to, and so two other users made me promise to make it all up by building a respectable body of work, and I chose science stuff to fix. And I did it! Finally! So now they are happy too. . | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f6830940870ec933 | """""""""
Please have only swamiji's photo to avoid deletion
oldruff
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f684018fb02f1bb8 | "
There are only three topics on the dab page for us to worry about, and only one where the article title is actually ""King of Hell"". There's also WP:TITLECHANGES. The comic book has been at King of Hell for ten years (!) without any evidence of reader confusion. This can (and is being) handled by a hatnote. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f6848e7cb41f454c | However the webmaster of webmistress resaerches imdb.com before adding, it says whenever you submit bits of trivia for it.
Plus people not like us don't write bbc.com or davidwalliams.com yet you delete the information I find there | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f685497dcaa6f78e | "
Hey. I believe that the IP user 72.11.138.103 may be Inkheart again. A few hours ago, the anon made four edits only to stuff Inkheart's sockpuppets use to edit, and followed Inkheart's MO of removing template tags. phois
Same with anon phois " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f6870d77ed96ef03 | REDIRECT Template talk:Chancellors of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f687ba246ae02b2c | . Even what an editor might think is tiny gets received as major - remember this | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f6887fe23ea79a77 | Bandurria
https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bandurria_(instrumento_musical) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f68bcc59dcaa8fb2 | Your obessed
With user KNOWIG what the fuck is wrong with you. Seek psyriatric help | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f68c2ca8995282cd | FL review
Hey , I wanted to touch base with you regarding my latest FL nomination at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of plantations in West Virginia/archive2. You had previously reviewed my nomination and supported it for FL status (see archive1). I was forced to withdraw the nomination on account of having too many nominations on the page at the same time. If it wouldn't be any trouble, could you please re-review the list and voice your comments and concerns at the new review page? Thanks again for your continued quality contributions to Wikipedia!
I'll try to take a look soon. — '''''' | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f68d9ef333909f03 | Fucking whore
You are such a dumb bitch i didn't make any changes whore!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
f6903e5ae832c858 | "
Reply from Ian13
Thank you for your message on my talk page. I have replied to your message and would be grateful if you'd continue the discussion on my talk page. /t " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f69221ef7212757d | also normally don't care if people do it as part of another major edit as I have been known to do from time to time | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f693a5ec7f6fcff2 | and all the little wiki wonks, who trying to earn their little barn stars with their little wiki scripts doing their little wiki work, and all of it meaningless | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f69608d0f167c57e | PROPOL's love of BIG WORDS
The word for today, children is P L A G I A R I S M.
I have a word that goes with it, it's M A L I C I O U S.
Propol, make me believe in WP:AGF
and stop this kind of crud. Now you know, as well as I, that the verbal quip is not
plagiarism. I know, that you know that the word was not
used or even implied in the article you cite. If you
want to use big words, you better, and I MEAN better sources then
some little article. It better be court records or other, absolutely solid
evidence or such accusation borders on L I A B L E ( Another Big word ).
So, stop, and behave. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f696408a317a7fe4 | why you are a bastard
I hope your dog dies. | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
f696409435ca2f22 | "::: HI. Yes we have to keep moving forward. People (3/4?) are mostly like the Hobbits, the ones who stayed in the Shire. They dont even know they dont know. I think something bigs going to go down this decade. A lot of people are waking up to whats going on and the Elite are running out of cover. They will try something, again. Like they did in Syria. I never thought Id be grateful for the influence of the Brics block esp Russia, but I am due to their effect on a corrupted Western elite who want War. Fortunately the US military is over rated and Russian weaponary esp missiles, all categories, are superior. (not well known). AS for wikipedians, very uncreative platform here constrains them and its open to abuse. But we have to try. Lol talk
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f69a0d56ea0d6bd1 | "Fuck You==
hey fuck you, who the fuck checks ""Phnom Nam Lyr Wildlife Sanctuary"" for vandalism. Get a fucking life you turd bag
==" | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
f69a8f2785ffd791 | Extremely well written new edit! It clears up some of the obscurity in Apollonius Rhodius' poem. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f69ac4d6d903bad9 | "
Out of hand
After looking over this article again, this article is infused with POV and biasedness. For example, language like ""people you never thought would take home Oscares in the 90s..."" is found throughout the article. This article really needs some cleanup. I'll start on the road toward eliminating some POV, but it's not something I can do without other people helping me. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f69c38f1d67b808b | "Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Talk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f69d5a3fa1c4ce20 | "
May I suggest you don't take Arcayne's word as Gospel? Arcayne fought tooth and nail a half dozen people over the definition of the word ""Penultimate"". He even claimed that he was an Oxford grad and that the BBC was wrong.75.57.205.135 " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f69e3be056666240 | Apologies for my typo. It should be 2011, not 2012. - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
f69fce76c7fc3cd3 | Thanks for your reply:
1- Who has raised the NPOV objection that you have dated?
2- What are the basis as they would have to state a reason, otherwise it is illegal?
3- The warnings on my page have all been by GlassFet. I maintained from the beginning that he was a sockpuppet of Ekajati who was banned and had many other illegal names too. Finally this was proven and he was banned. Someone, I do not know who, probably a bot or an admin, had set his warnings invisible. They are now again visible after your interaction. I consider them an honor. I will monitor for his presence in any way possible vigilantly in future. Are you in any form in contact with that person or his cult of English Aro which is dismissed by Tibetan lamas and considered anti-Buddhist?
4- If no comment on the objection is forthcoming, please reverse your dating action as it is reinforcing an illegal procedure.
I will post a copy of this reply in the article's talk page for the record as well.
Thanks. User:Thegone) 29, 10 February 2008 (UTC) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.