id
stringlengths
16
16
comment_text
stringlengths
6
5k
toxic
int64
0
1
severe_toxic
int64
0
1
obscene
int64
0
1
threat
int64
0
1
insult
int64
0
1
identity_hate
int64
0
1
fb43262df2117199
REDIRECT Talk:A Girl Like You (Cliff Richard and The Shadows song)
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb4444e16809cd66
I completely agree as well. Now you have your 'general consensus, and can accept, please, that the British Empire still exists. (And hopefully always will.)
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb457a633121fb86
- (talk • contribs) -
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb45b3ec85cd1d1d
Thanks. Not so coincidentally, it's really hard to respond effectively without the ability to post on ANI, but the short version is that nothing has changed since the last time these very same editors tried to get rid of me. They just saw an opportunity after engineering the block. As with Rocco's two-week marathon of persecution, we already know in advance that the Cloud will vote to get rid of me under any circumstances: it's their game and I'm a piece of the wrong color. So far, TFD has perjured himself shamelessly; not just the part where he denies that all of our sources recognize Geller as right-wing, but the whole false narrative woven out of random diffs that nobody thinks to check for themselves. I'd like to be able to say I'm surprised or disappointed, but this has happened too many times already. It really comes down to whether the community has the will to oppose them. If not, then it gets what it deserves: more articles owned by the Cloud, fewer editors willing to contribute their free time. If we forcibly recused every member of the Cloud, the report against me would evaporate. P.S. Let's see how this response gets misquoted against me.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb4663d88ccb694c
, a Salishan language
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb47bc21b2dccb2a
" A barnstar for you! The Writer's Barnstar Thanks for the writing such a wonderful and concise article on Ida Shepard Oldroyd! Absolutely fantastic! "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb49a4baf7acb012
I wasn't writing an article on porno. I wrote about a sexual study done in South Florida.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb49c1862b74c788
There are many things I'd like better than to see you gone. I'd like to see you contributing to Wikipedia in your usual high-quality manner, and I'd like to see you involved in less heat and static. I'd like to see you not show up in WQA threads that are easily avoidable. I certainly recall seeing you choose to say or do things that would obviously and inevitably lead to heat and static, and then when shit happened, you played dumb about it. You're not naïve, and you can't fool me into thinking that you are. So, yeah, I'd like to see less of that kind of nonsense. I'd like to see your good work continue, and your unnecessarily provocative bullshit end. That's a pretty reasonable desire, isn't it? -
0
0
1
0
0
0
fb4a2076c416e3af
" Hi. I received your comment. Thanks again. My deletion of the comment was intentional and not accidental. I always delete comments, once I have resolved the issue. I like to have a ""clear"" desk, if you will. Thanks a million! ( )"
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb4a372872b40250
" Back to Methuselah I want critical commentary on Back to Methuselah before submitting it for peer review. It is still classified as ""Stub"", although it no longer is. I've looked for illustrative pictures but found none of interest. Please respond to this on my user page and tell me where you wish future communications to be placed. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb4a763f74b06bb3
Platinum Wedding Anniversary? Platinum weddings are celebrated in the 60th or 75th year of marriage (depends), so why is this on the page? 10 years too late or 5 years too early....
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb4b0bb4adf63b20
" Proposed deletion of Ahmad El Bashiti Ahmad El Bashiti has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt this person might not be notable enough for an article. Please review Wikipedia:Notability (people) for the relevant guidelines. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so. If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the ""prod"" template, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but if an editor is still not satisfied that it meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. (Talk) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb4c98814219d349
Sorry, but my settings are watch all pages I edit, so I saw the block thing. Anyway, NOW stop by my user page, and you'll see a few changes. Ian
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb4cb6da1e3cd1cd
January 2008 (UTC) Decent. More important news, HIM! GRAMMY! YES?! 09:59, 23
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb4d1a938da300be
Even if your asumptions are true I was asking to have it edited not doing it. Right?
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb4d34c1f3152bb2
" Much/muchly ""One form of much, muchly is used to say that something is likely to happen."" This doesn't make sense to me. If there is no objection it should be deleted. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb4e523de43946d4
==Chris Rogers (actor) deletion== Hello Aitias! I was just informed by someone who wanted to edit the Wiki page on myself that it is no longer existant. What a real shame! I have read through your conditions of having a page on Wikipedia and I ensure you that I am not a business advertising. I am a sole artist, have recorded several albums and have been in many theatrical productions of which I've written a few myself. I produce and direct film and have worked with international names though not quite as successful as for example my friend Xavier Naidoo. Could I ask you to reinstate the page? I do realise that www.bethemoviestar.com was listed and they have recently gone bankrupt. That however is no fault of mine and just needs to be rewritten. Thank you for your time! Chris 212.183.134.130
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb51270a80231cf9
martyr does not have a 'specific' meaning in religions, in every religion it means to die protecting what God said, now the fact that there are different religions this is another subject.... Same goes for you, you should read my stuff and discuss before you undo everything i wrote, four of you undoed what i did, one guy did it four times ) ... you are not better than me just because there are four of you and you have a 'status' of an editor ) The fact that secular people are using this word is kind of like saying the secular people use word God and change the meaning of if and say it means something else. Now if you want to add secular definitions of God such as, he does not exist, or secular sections to word martyr which means someone is a martyr that dies for his soccer team, feel free, if you have no fear of God ) .... just because you call someone a martyr cuz he gave his life for a country doesn't make him a martyr ... he is not.... SOLUTION this page needs to be split into religios and secular........ then lets see how many secular things can be written about the word??? U talk about this word about what other people use this word for , you really don't know what the word means. there is a difference being a real martyr in the after life , vs a martyr (hero) in this life after you are dead or a fake one, a lie, not true one... i don't know how else to explain it. does the truth mean anything to you, or is the intention of wikipedia's staff to confuse to world )
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb51808d35542099
Now that we have the section on Etymology and Terminology, which covers those points, it does seem to me that those footnotes can be removed from the introduction, and the references added to the new section as appropriate - but I haven't checked the details of what the refs say, and we need to make sure that they support the terminology used in the text.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb52ae8c4b4b72cf
NOT SET IN NEW YORK !!!! why when i deleted the Category Video games set in New York City some retardeds keep putting it back ? now for all the retards who think it should be back listen up-the game takes place in liberty city not new york !!!!!! just because liberty city is based on new york does not mean that the game is set in new york you fucking retards !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
1
1
0
0
0
0
fb53135bab0d66da
" GAN of Frill-necked Lizard Hi, I have given my initial comments on the article on the talk page. It is on hold awaiting improvements. If you need any help feel free to ask. [[User talk:Triplestop|'''Triplestop''']] x3 "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb57ad9400dd405f
" Read the notice again. It says exactly what it means. You state you are the artist; per Wikipedia policy, you cannot write about yourself. -''''''(TALK) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb57f5f50c088654
" Love to hear your comparrison to wikipedia ""ReMax"" and other similar sites. I'm all ears... "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb58f59d973fbf91
uniphi page, I made a mistake
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb594f15e358bfa3
high or low line the queen Elizabeth II line is a low line and there are higher lines from e.g. Henry 8th that would be normally above this line... and i'm not talking about the pretender lines ... hi/lo hold your own ... Sr 47.18.43.166
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb5b3c0d7c0e1103
Please stop removing content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb5c2d2fbeb748a9
Now you explain to me why you keep deleting serious content. I´m looking to watch that.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb5f48f8124d8e9b
"== Macedonians/Macedonian Slavs == I was under impression that the name of the article would change to a compromising variant: Macedonians (nation), Macedonians (nationality), Macedonians (people) or whatever since the resources shown clearly point that Macedonian Slavs is rather inappropriate. I'm glad the whole poll thing is over, but what is the overall conclusion: 1. the naming committee will discuss on the matter of Macedonians/Macedonian Slavs name 2. Macedonian Slavs stays until another poll is organized or 3. a status quo for an indefinite period of time? Since you seem to be the only neutral admin actively engaged in this debate, it seem to me that you are the right person to ask these questions.... 02:49, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC) If a poll doesn't reach a decision, the poll is treated as moot and the status quo is continued. I agree that the name ""Macedonian Slavs"" is inappropriate (and many of the arguments made against using it were blatantly POV). The problem is that right now we don't have a mechanism for ensuring that the name is decided objectively. I'll have a chat with the other admins to see if anything can be done in the short term (bear in mind that the naming committee is just a proposal, it's not been endorsed yet). 11:43, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC) I would like you to know that I appreciate your active involvement in the Macedonians/Macedonian Slavs issue, because if it is left to polls to decide such delicate matters, Wikipedia would soon degenerate. The English Wikipedia, and its mirror sites are the most important generators of the Macedonian Slavs term on the net - , which is much unfortunate, because it makes the term more ""common"" than it actually is. There was a brief period of some ""Macedonian Slavs"" references in BBC or CNN's news articles (the first half of 2001), but they have withdrawn the term very soon. The naming committee is a good idea to resolve matters of this type, since the naming of the article itself is a specific NPOV question - the different POV's can hardly be ""described"" in it. I don't want to leave the impression that I'm trying to put a pressure on you, but please resolve this dispute in a reasonable period of time (that is, don't forget about it -)). Thanks again for your contributions. 17:04, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC) Just remember that we need to figure out what is neutral, not what is objectively correct. A committee which ""votes"" on what is ""objectively correct"" will not get ""endorsed"". This is the kind of thing which probably cannot be decided by a committee. See Wikipedia:naming conflict. (talk) 10:41, Jun 26, 2005 (UTC) I didn't say we should decide what is correct, merely what the common usage is. What I'm arguing against is the use of arguments such as ""they don't have a right to use this name"", which is what's been happening so far. BTW, the link you provided doesn't work - could you point me to the right place? 10:45, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC) Sorry about the red link thing. I was using it as a ""forward reference"". That is, I made a comment referring to a policy page BEFORE writing that policy page. I also oppose the use (in Wikipedia articles, anyway) of arguments like X doesn't have the right to use the name Y. We can, of course, say that P rejects X's use of the name Y. (talk) 01:40, Jun 27, 2005 (UTC) The Naming Committee Hi, it's me again. About two weeks have passed since the end of the Macedonians/Macedonians Slavs poll. We are waiting for the Naming Committee to be established and to resolve this issue, am I right? Just to be sure... 9 July 2005 12:35 (UTC) Pic of the Day Hi Chris, Just to let you know, that your picture Image:New scotland yard.jpg is due to make a reappearance as Pic of the Day on the 6th July. I've reused the caption from last time, but you can make any changes at Wikipedia:Picture of the day/July 6, 2005. 30 June 2005 08:59 (UTC) Macedonians Can you find some administrator to block the article temporarily until the spirits calm down? Or should I try to write to someone? July 3, 2005 14:23 (UTC) Don't worry about it - I'll warn him of the 3 revert rule and if he breaks it, I'll block him. 3 July 2005 14:25 (UTC) Take a look at what's happening in the article. VMORO is starting an edit war by doubting every single of my edits, on sections which are irre
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb60bf83739273c9
2012 (UTC) Cheers 22:08, 16 July
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb6103c144c9eb8b
Thanks for experimenting with the page Mosque on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Krich (talk)
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb6244562819b198
You are funny fucking Yankee Ignorant
1
0
1
0
1
0
fb654948c1c13fdd
???? What is your FUCKING problem
1
0
1
0
0
0
fb656fcb8dd47cb1
Climate Audit The result was keep. Further discussion over whether to redirect or keep as an article may be continued on the article's talk page. Regards, Arbitrarily0 (talk) Further disruption by restoring the redirect against consensus will result in enforcement action. Please stop your disruptive behaviour
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb67550fb558cf4e
Help needed My brother uses the same IP as my account (when i am not at university), but people are leaving personal attacks on his page and accusing me of having sock accounts, so what shall i do? His account is - User talk:86.10.119.131
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb6821b7b26d437b
" }} Invite Hi, you are graciously extended an invitation to join the Saskatchewan WikiProject and WikiProject Saskatchewan Communities & Neighbourhoods! The Saskatchewan WikiProject is a fairly new WikiProject. We are a group of editors who are dedicated to creating, revising, and expanding articles, lists, categories, and Wikiprojects, to do with anything Saskatchewan. We look forward to welcoming you to the project! | talk "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb6977954cc68910
While I believe the situation could have been handled better by everyone, there is nothing to be gained by further discord on this subject. You have been given an adequate chance to properly cite your additions; I suggest you either do so, or not, and move on. I have closed the discussion on my talk page and request that no further comment be made there. Thank you.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb69cf8ee3268395
Climate change contributions Thanks for your attempts to improve these articles. As you are finding out, making positive changes generally, getting the articles closer to WP:NPOV is time-consuming and can be very frustrating. Best wishes,
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb6b6a3b209e9cb3
" Sitush, You are missing too many things, Ahir being only a subclass of Yadav and artile mentioning Ahir as non-elite can not be used in the lead to mention all Yadavs as ""non-elite"".Read otrher objections too, you missed all of them. And hang-on, I am confused, If you're saying that Yadavas of lunar dynasty and Krishnauts are same as Yadavs then why are we not putting other citations about Yadavas here and have moved it to Yadava. You are confusing everyone man, and that's why is dubious tag "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb6bc1d9febfd1d3
in this matter with me
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb6c60bfc9d7f20b
Establishing this article Hi. As I set out briefly at my talk page, in order to establish an article on this advertising promotion, you need to be able to demonstrate that the promotion is notable in and of itself as according to the [[WP:N|notability guidelines. To demonstrate this, you need to provide reliable sources. If the advertising campaign has received coverage in industry magazines, for instance, or has one industry awards, that would help establish notability. If it has been discussed by newspapers or popular magazines, that would help establish notability. Sources connected to the parent company cannot be used for this purpose. The article also needs to be written neutrally and in an encyclopedic manner. It cannot utilize text taken directly from any other website or source unless that text is released under a license consistent with the GFDL. If an article on this campaign does not meet the above policies and guidelines, it is likely to be deleted or nominated for deletion again. If you have questions about any of these guidelines, you might want to seek additional clarification at the help desk. It can sometimes take a few minutes before you get a reply, but that page is manned around the clock by volunteers, and sooner or later somebody will answer your question. (talk)
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb6c93b5daa6cab5
Ziegler's biography is not favorable to Edward. Indeed, Williams's is the most sympathetic treatment and she's writing after the release of all the documents and opening of the archives. Wikipedia should not publish original research. The article should mirror the coverage in secondary and tertiary sources, and in this case high-quality reliable sources that are consistent with WP:FACR criterion 1c.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb6d6480c7f0e028
hello.i am looserman11.please be nice and i will be nice back
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb6e63ee7629ee49
" I didn't call anyone for ""zionist terrorist"" STOP this fabrication!! I am the person who are most suited to edit Wikipedia instead of those liars."
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb6f9777dc6b5843
Please don't post on this page unless it's really, really important.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb714700ef0c0631
" I wondered when you would notice that. Perhaps you'd like to edit the Great Offices article to reflect the discrepancy (and note that article's talk page has an interesting discussion about the possibility of their being five Great Offices. However, it doesn't remotely confirm your contention that the ""Great Offices of State"" simply do not exist as a familiar, if fluid, concept and that the article should therefore be deleted. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb7262091063e068
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to 311 (band). It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb7744257366a162
In fairness You seem like a great guy, but the world deserves to know about the guys weight problem. You must admit, those are impressive mantits! 86.40.200.196
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb78b55f1d5c585e
ROTFLMAO!!! This is a fucking riot!!!!
1
1
1
0
0
0
fb7909deac62c37a
Great, thanks. I've alerted the Spirituality Wikiproject and asked them to review the article. Thanks again.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb79bf8222f64b21
Can I ask if you can look into this IP's edits to see if it could be yet another sock of TheREALCableGuy? Thanks. (talk to me)(talk to others)
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb7a25a5eaaf56ee
star wars sucks peoplw with no lives like that gay stuff
1
0
0
0
1
1
fb7a291996b03b2c
, I just want to be left alone can't you fucking understand that?
1
0
0
0
0
0
fb7b0927e3542e50
" Willdawg111, don't delete a section from this talk page arbitrarily. Please follow the format used in all Bellator seasons (that's the format widely accepted) and stop calling everyone that reverts you a ""vandal"" (since your edits can be considered disruptive, they'll be probably reverted). You've been warned many times about this. If you insist on continuing this edit war i'll have to report you in Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Remember, the work is not yours, it belongs to everyone (it's under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License) and is subject to change anytime (we always try to follow a consensus). Whiskey "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb7b4687767173df
" Template figures: shock The main template lists ""875 treated for shock"" for Israel. To be fair, it should list the number treated for shock in the other two columns. But to be realistic, this is a POV measurment, since Hezbollah and Lebanon are probably lacking the treatment facilities to treat shock victims. I say it should be removed altogether from the tally. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb7bcdfe1a53e776
Lawis 1630 and not 1830[edit] to: User:Unbuttered Parsnip Dont make any changes or jump into any statement as not true without showing any basis. I was in Lawis for a visit the structure in front of it was a memorial with its inscription that the Kota was built in year 1790. Basing from this then your 1830 edit will be untrue. on the upper hand I read book written during spanish time I found out that the structure was built in 1630 and not in 1790.... So I didn't follow the year 1790 as the founding date of the Kota which was posted by the municipality of Madridejos but the year 1630 as the founding date as narrated by fray Medina. you changed facts claiming to be wrong but when ask about your basis or reference you are unable to provide. You are inconsistent with your edits, first the 1630 you change to 1830 then now changed it to 1790 and deleted some references.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb7bf18f53ed56d7
THIS IS STALKING I should not have to explain my desire or need for privacy. PERIOD. This is a WIkipedia policy, as well. AND THERE IS A REASON FOR IT. My objection was the use of my real name, not a user name. Ted knows that. HE is now attempting to sling whatever mud wherever he can, because he wants me permanently banned,. That someone has not blocked him already for obvious harassment and baseless accusations is incomprehensible.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb7bfb21a98fe4ee
, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC) If the claim is that this is to a large extent about precedence and enforcement of policies, then it may be better to not paint this as a polarized debate between two fractions. Granted, I believe there are two vocal parties on opposite sides of this debate, but is right that there are intermediate positions as well. However, I'd like to stress again that this is not about which moves should be carried out. I don't think the ArbCom would ever consider deciding on which articles should be renamed. Rather, this is about what steps the community can take to ensure that global decisions (naming conventions) arrived at by consensus are not blocked locally (when deciding what title to use for a specific article), or what to do when local decisions run counter to more encompassing principles. For illustrating this particular kind of problem, it's sufficient to have two parties that disagree. The precise nature and extent of the disagreement is not really that important. 13:53
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb7d8e8c1dd3a504
" Please stop your disruptive editing. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. society (review) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings."
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb7f3215b90231c1
UNBLOCK - the question of integrity is not an issue for moderators? Regardless of the WP:TRUTH that you seem to think you hold, Wikipedia works on a) WP:CONSENSUS, b) reliable sources, and c) a collegial editing environment. Your edits clearly show you're harassing an editor that you disagree with. You will not be permitted to continue that way. Please also note: stop typing in ALL CAPS - it's considered to be shouting, and that doesn't go over well on the internet (talk→ BWilkins ←track) Regardless of the WP:TRUTH that you seem to think you hold - No, those rules are from WIKIPEDIA not me. What i dont see is you addressing the blatent biased opinion, synthesis, on an article which is viewed by others. Please tell me does wikipedia allow ADMINS to hold a biased one sided opinion? When SIKH HISTORY admin have openly declared adherence to a strict orthodox viewpoint, you as MOD should really be enforcing wikipedias own rules on your own admin. You unblocking me is secondry to the blatent disregard for wikipedia rules on diet in sikhism. So its NOT MY truth that i hold, its wikikpedia rules that i hold, which YOU disregard. Now you have barred me, because you deem me argument on integrity an attack on ADMIN, when i have repeated over and over again, its an ISSUE of an article which is purely one sided. Now does wikipedia allow blatant disregard of rules from their own ADMIN? From the same scholar, same book, same ISBN NUMBER, one rejected and one accepted, the accepted statement fits in with the ADMINS own orthodox stance which he has openly declared on his Wikipedia page. 1.QUOTE FROM ARTICLE - Gobind Singh Mansukhani states how vegetarianism and meat-eating has been left to the individual Sikh. 2.QUOTE FROM DELETED PASSAGE -scholars hold a view that Sikhism has an ambivalent view on diet, yet some accept that there are, “passages against meat eating”. REF for both 1 and 2. Gobind Singh Mansukhani, Introduction to Sikhism, Delhi: Hemkunt Press, ISBN 81-7010-181-6, “There are passages against meat, in the Adi Granth”. Both references from the SAME scholar, yet one is accepted which is favor of an ambivalent view towards diet, while another assessment from the same scholar admitting their are passages against meat eating, is not accepted. Why the Double standards? Why does the ADMIN on sikhhistory, blatantly support their own ideological stance, to the point of synthesis, and selectively using texts and passages, from authors who they cite, and then reject the same authors when going against their position? How can you adressing harassment, yet make no attempt on addressing the issue of BIAS in your articles? Do you only protect the Orthodox Sunni islamic view? and the unorthodox shia view?...IF that is not the case, then please can you tell me why sikhhistory ADMIN have taken the biased stance of only abiding by an orthodox POV. I dont think these questions im asking is harassment, but if my objection is avoided time and again, and the same allegations being made towards the same ADMIN for being one sided, you again have AVOIDED the issue at hand, which is a biased article protected by ADMIN to support their own beleifs, i think that is a greater offense than my trying to get some sense from the ADMIN in question. lol.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb7fdbbcaf3fae95
" Societal Pressure There is little doubt that this section could be relevant to ""Thigh gap"", but the connection appears to be WP:SYNTHESIS. I think it can be left in for now, but we need a source that connects the desire to attain a thigh gap with eating disorder issues. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb81bfa2fdf9bff8
" Dana Scallon Does any one moniter you Phil? First you add, then you delete, then you re-add the same information, then you delete each time citing a different reason. Your latest removal of reference to Heart Beat Records as copyright owner stated the reason you removed it was because it was being contested in court. This was after you took it off and then came back and added it. Regardless, the reason you cite for your actions THIS time is inaccurate. The copyright owner , Hearbeat Records, has sued another party for violating copyrights that they own. There are no suits against them or legal proceedings where someone has contested their ownership. Where do you get this from? Please cite your source as the only public information availabe is the law suit in which Heart Beat has sued another party for violating copyrights they own in as verified by the US Copyright office. I simply do not understand how you come up with your reasoning to not cite Heart Beat as the official copyright holder of the CD's that are listed under the US Copyright Office? It seems you have a history of creating your own facts Phil and I do not believe Wikipedia was created for that Retrieved from ""http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Phil_Sandifer"""
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb82893cbc894b3f
Far too overzealous This bot should not be undoing valid image inclusions. It lacks the intelligence to make good decisions as to whether the images should be removed or not. It only seems to base its decision on whether or not the image page has text outside of its templates. Actually I really don't even know if that is good enough. Thing is, editors shouldn't have to learn OrphanBot's personal policies in addition to Wikipedia's policies in order to ensure the continued condition of articles. This would invite a never-ending problem of needing to know the rules of every bot on WP. Removing content from articles in the brain-dead way that OrphanBot does is a disruptive practice. - ¶
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb84e4b542c8626e
Commercial External Links? Who controls the protected External Links tab at the bottom? There has been a link for years to a non-commercial Bonsai Wiki http://wiki.bonsaitalk.com , which is relevant and in the spirit of wikipedia. I see that link (among others) have been pulled and in its place is what appears to be a protected external link divider with a single entry linked to a a site with banner ads. What's up? -
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb85866b0ac8a16c
" Islam and antisemitism Bless sins, i would strongly urge you to consider mediation on Islam and antisemitism, as per WP:DR. as talk page discussion and RfCs have not worked, perhaps the involvement of an independent mediator will help bring things to a resolution, and perhaps will at least help temporarily stop the edit warring. as it currently stands, i don't believe there is likely to be any resolution to the back-and-forth reverts in the near future. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb85beec8f8da414
1 Year of the Collaboration of the Week Hello again to those of WikiProject Oregon. It is time again for another Collaboration of the Week. The last two weeks were a Stub Improvement Drive, and thank you to those who improved any Stubs. This week marks the one week anniversary of the COTW, so a brief highlight reel: At least 10 DYKs Three articles passed GA after being listed at COTW Probably around 25 articles started Almost all Top importance articles are now better than Stub class And now on with our countdown. This week we have two requests, the Willamette Meteorite and Tom McCall. Hopefully we can get both to GA quality. Click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Thank you.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb86ee07c08199d6
"::Hi Doctormatt, perhaps we could say that a ""derivative is the rate of change of a function or quantity at a certain time."" That seems fairly unequivocal and much more accessible than what is currently there. I'm not so much a proponent of my own version so much as an *opponent* of the use of the meaningless (to the non-mathematical) word ""instantaneous."" I don't really mind the differentiation thing being right after the initial sentence, because people might have clicked on the derivative page after going to differentiation (a disambig page). It's certainly grammatical to say ""Finding a derivative is called differentiation""; see gerund. However, now that I think about it, maybe we should just say ""Differentiation is the process of finding a derivative."" (We put the sentence in the active voice.) Your thoughts? Best, "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb8d1ae8ebdf7da3
I fail to understand why people immediatly jump to the conclusion that the game ended just like that, thinking the story was over. To put sophisticatedly and wikipedialy though, most of the complainers are in the North America region, where the people have a thirst for complaining so deep that it clouds their interpretation.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb8d622c2e7b01fc
Faggggggggggggit drew likes penis
1
0
1
0
1
0
fb8dcf268c6e2119
" The quote ""The oppressed are allowed once every few years....."" It's actually from State and Revolution by Vladimir Lenin. I have no permission to edit this page, but it would be nice if someone addressed this issue."
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb8e398ef9d60986
HERE WE GO AGAIN! Another not so known person who is now famous because somehing bad happened to them which happens every day to thousands of people. This page should be deleted. 214.13.192.187
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb9071f9092849ee
" Welcome Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to [ create an account]. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address () is used to identify you instead. In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! flame "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb928d178a114d78
yup, de-orphanizing Night combat sounds good - would be nice to see that article grown substantially with a lot more info about strategy, tactics, and examples of successful/unsuccessful night attacks (e.g. going right back to the 1stC when a bunch of Scots nearly wiped out Rome's 9th Legion). It's an interesting subject, but I don't really know enough about it to contribute in any significant way - apart from dropping in some examples. Let me know if you want to get stuck in?
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb947386616885fc
As 'mod' is a short term for modification, it is a mod. Any change made to the original software or content must be considered a modification, whether it is 1 bit or 100 MB. Because it has been changed beyond the original design and construction of the game. USing a Game Shark or Action Replay is actually modifying code to make this available, thus the game you are then playing is _not_ the original game no matter how you look at it.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb95fb0705f4fcb3
No problem. It was a long discussion with a lot of changing opinions, but I think it's felt that eras on class categories imply that every ship in that category served in that era (not necessarily true), while eras on class articles don't imply that to the same extent, and it's kind of nice to see what classes served in an era instead of just seeing a list of ships.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb9761ba8bb54a14
WM23, Cruft in trivia section taken from archive. TJ, nothing new has been added to that discussion in three days, can it just be put back in to the Archive 3? I archive the page cause it was really long, if the issue comes up then what would be wrong in starting a new section and pointing out that the discussion is in the archive? How about we give it 'til midnight, if no one else has chimed in then move it back to the archive.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb97c5109083b447
" I looked, but I didn't see the resemblence. Regarding the quote about the baseball bats, I had BLP concerns about Berlet's interpretation. I'm not convinced that LaRouche was in any way advocating the use of baseball bats. Take a look at the reasoning you applied at Talk:George Soros where you argued against the use of the quote from ""60 Minutes,"" and then see if the same reasoning doesn't apply in this case. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb98e6751d1e1c30
" >> Let me remind Zleitzen and the others here that the concepts of human rights and all of it's associated ideals of democracy, freedom, rule of law, etc. ARE indeed western-centric! Where do you think these terms originated? Iran? Even the supposedly objective Amnesty International originated in the West (England). In fact, if it weren't for the democracies and freedoms of the West, YOU nor I would have the forum (freedom?) to write here in these pages. Indeed, Wikipedia would NEVER have been created, and your pal George Orwell would have been jailed by the Nazis! I'm am indeed curious: when were you born? I had a laugh when I read this: ""Does anyone know if there are any other notable systematic human rights rankings, especially ones with a non-Western perspective?"" Yeah, yeah, keep looking! Let me know when you ""think"" you have found such a thing. I think you will have better luck finding a Persian restaurant along the Amazon River. Alex (analyst9) <<"
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb990e6a8e5c0d67
cunt cunt cunt cunt cunt
1
0
1
0
1
0
fb992abddc1990a8
" said he unblocked me early, but I'm still unable to made edits. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb9c546331e4313e
Info Related to Date and place of birth would be welocme.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb9c62c8192528ad
By all means keep the list in the article, all I suggested was that we shouldn't list potential champions because there are no other titles to win at present. Think of it like the WCW Triple Crown listng, acknowledge those who made it, but it would just clutter up the article to list those who are one away, when the titles don't exist anymore. Same idea with the ECW TC. Give credit to those who got there, but until the titles come back, there can be no other TC winners. By the way, Anakinjmt, Thanks for backing me up in the U.S. Title debate. 21:08 19 December 2006 (UTC)
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb9caae814bc8b17
Hey, I'll get back to you later today -I'm about to go to work, Thanks, Philip
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb9e48ef2d67e505
U don't nd Ur friend dare advice me like that
0
0
0
0
0
0
fb9ffbf8a4d39099
I find it amazing how Wiki has grown through the years and i am glad to be part of it
0
0
0
0
0
0
fba056af6bb24675
" Anyone who claims that ethnic Jews can't be ethnic Germans obviously subscribes to a completely outdated, racist definition of ethnicity. Talk:Germans is full of clearly racist statements by this user, and this is relevant to the behavioural problem. Example: ""A person can choose an identity, like an Italian American can see his main identity as American and not feel Italian in any way, but ethnically he will still be Italian, it's not changeable. It's your genes, where your ancestors came from. I don't see what's your problem just admitting the fact that Jews are a separate ethnicity. Einstein never identified as a German but for a reason a few Germans here insist on having some ownership on him (after trying to kill him and his people)."" Hans Adler "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fba0c46f023db99b
Gee, I could have sworn I posted a constructive comment here. Must have gone into a wormhole, or been fascistisized. 68.240.150.91
0
0
0
0
0
0
fba17a91aecb566f
Thank you so much for bringing this book to the page, by the way. I enjoyed the chapter you posted above very much. I've always wanted to know the history of autism. In this conversation I said I'd like to write an article about the word, autism, as Bleuler and Kraepelin used it, and this text will be very helpful with that.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fba21c19ecaf4d2d
Re: Talk:Padua College Who died and left you in charge? Paduans show pride and respect towards their school outside of Wikipedia; who gives a toss if it a lawless website is taken advantage of. Paduans show their pride outside the internet, Paduans show pride at AIC Carnivals, weekend sport (regardless whether or not its volleyball, cricket, rugby, soccer, tennis, basketball), and like yourself many Paduans show pride in their academic and non-physical extra-curricular life. I hardly think that the appearance and Hitler-like control of the Padua Wiki page should be left to you (after all, you leave at the end of the year!) 14.17 2 July 2007 (UTC)
0
0
0
0
0
0
fba222c73f8ae3c0
I'm not sure that's necessary, Anna. The recent disputes have been the result of a single editor's obstructive edits. I suggest that the article be examined one section/heading at a time. Most of the country data only needs minor tweaks, if that, to be neutral. The lead is problematic, but I suggest that we take some version of it, possibly the current version, and agree not to make changes until they have been discussed and meet consensus. The recent flurry of edits has been in response to major changes that were not discussed. It shouldn't take long to come up with an acceptable version.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fba27f6b8337fbc8
RE: Bizarre Ride II Shit, I wrote that entire thing, man. It got turned down for FA, so I'm done with it. Good luck though.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fba2c4588704194b
Besides, we don't really have rites of passage in the dominate American culture!!!
0
0
0
0
0
0
fba3b871fa047839
There's nothing in the block log. What acount do you want unblocked?
0
0
0
0
0
0
fba5a4e3ab6ad28d
DuckDuckGo svg logo Now that DuckDuckGo has a new logo, could you replace the old one with the new?
0
0
0
0
0
0
fba8a64c9695a5e0
" Eucosmia What does the word mean? Hi - I'd be happy to be rid of Eucosmia if it is of no use. My only interest in it is its similar spelling to Eucosma, Euosmia, etc. I tried to find a definition for eucosmia but it is not in Wiktionary or any other online dictionaries or other etymology resources as far as I can tell. Is it a Latin or Greek word? The only reference I could find was that it means ""decorum"" from Pythagoras of Samos (ca. 570–496 B.C.) . But I'm no expert on molluscs or Latin words, so its your call! (I'll post this on Invertzoo's talk page too). Thanks, "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fbaa1958820c284a
(I dispute that but don't feel that I need to elaborate as it's irrelevant to the request)
0
0
0
0
0
0
fbab27547a2e7362
|class=Start|importance=Mid|needs-infobox=no|info=Not much here with one possible reference. |move=Victorian College for the Deaf (Melbourne, Victoria)
0
0
0
0
0
0
fbaba922507eaeb5
K200AA K200AA has been proposed for deletion. Please review WP:NOT and WP:N for general concerns and improve the article if possible. (Talk)
0
0
0
0
0
0
fbac8e568e73e7e6
" Thank you. | Talk "
0
0
0
0
0
0
fbad528c40f2acdf
Thanks for the explanation.
0
0
0
0
0
0
fbae659a185e5e58
YOU ARE A FAGGIT. DARRY WAS HERE AS A FAGGIT. LET ME TALK TRASH TO KURT WARNER.
1
0
1
0
1
0