id
stringlengths 16
16
| comment_text
stringlengths 6
5k
| toxic
int64 0
1
| severe_toxic
int64 0
1
| obscene
int64 0
1
| threat
int64 0
1
| insult
int64 0
1
| identity_hate
int64 0
1
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0c5b211330b4bad1 | reason fail, we can always fail back on arguments of authority | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0c5bfee5cb01d7f7 | We all disagree with you and your link removal, the links provide a huge resource of information about LAN centers. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0c5da2024834c757 | Look, if an administrator thinks that an edit requested does not have consensus or is controversial they can turn it down. It's as simple as that. Your obsession with the rules should take a does of WP:IAR once and a while. Trust me on this one: you're not going to get anywhere with this appeal to authority. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0c5fda40b2fd8c32 | Your failure to recognize that a significant global prediction for a large rare event is every bit of scientific interest and speaks volumes about your ignorance and lack of scinetific prowness. So go ahead and pontificate away -maybe your mom will give you an 'attaboy' for your twisted view of science (whilst you sit on her basement couch in your underwear). Thanks again for affirming the process by witch WP will never have any credibilioty anywhere and is mostly a waste of time
(See-you served a good purpose afterall! Your mum would be proud!) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0c5fe082a45d3c21 | """I want to be a fuck you.""
That's a song.
" | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
0c613302588a1ddf | Wikipedias later - it | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0c6476fa46123172 | Sarah, I hope you don't mind me giving you a wee piece of friendly advice. I think you should wait until the arbcom case finishes before putting this here. You don't want to give them any more ammunition. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0c64b45c33ec9ec1 | .
Okay, I understand what you are saying. It's bias because I am the inventor and if added by someone other than the inventor it would be okay. Using my real name when saving changes now makes it unacceptable. An interesting bias in itself. -Dale | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0c6acfe61895ed14 | "
Well, none of us is here from the pro-ladling contingent, right? So, if we're all agreed that we'd like to use the most commonly recognized term, perhaps we can agree that it's not entirely clear which name is more commonly recognized. I see anecdotal evidence for both sides... Google-based evidence for both sides, and... um... I can't tell. Maybe ""Burma"" is still more common. Maybe ""Myanmar"" has supplanted it, in the English of most speakers worldwide. I don't think we've been presented with the right information to say for sure, nor do we know whether such information exists. How can we tell which is more commonly recognized? - " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0c6ba543ff1e6624 | "
WP:NPS
Parking here for safe-keeping:
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0c6bbebb0bb08fbd | Invintation
im giving you a invintation to join Wikipedia:WikiProject Baseball/San Duegi Padres What do ya say? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0c6bdb22adffe544 | "
Ok, I see. Thanks!''''—Expert Sectioneer'' of Wikipedia86 = 19+9+14 + karma = 19+9+14 + talk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0c6e91ecc24e14c2 | It Is Not A Hoax
I promus Got To WWW.newmovies.com look there | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0c6f3dc75e767463 | Yeah, that's a great explanation. , anyway, thank you for your reply. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0c701151ab03c97c | All you do is revert my edits get a life THE THINGS YOU EDIT YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT BUT BECAUSE YOU FEEL LIKE SOME WIKI VETERAN YOU THINK YOU KNOW EVERYTHING. You know nothing about anything as far as the west coast goes so you need to stop even searching or looking at these articles because they don't effect you. The information is correct and Wikipedia is here for people who don't know about things to know about and all you are doing is incorrectly educating people who look at these pages | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0c7223387636d176 | I'm sorry you don't seem to understand what the sciences chemistry and physics are, but my edits were correct and you are poorly abusing your role as an administrator. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0c75c68e3909bb8c | "
[""Do not make personal attacks anywhere in Wikipedia. Comment on content, not on the contributor. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Nobody likes abuse. Many Wikipedians remove personal attacks on sight. Users have been blocked or banned for repeatedly engaging in them. Abusive edit summaries are particularly ill-regarded."" (Wikipedia:No_personal_attacks)
""Avoid profanity (words or images that could be considered offensive by typical Wikipedia readers)"" (Wikipedia:Profanity)]" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0c7ae6d712b1e85c | Hi SmileBlueJay97, the page isn't a hoax.
The information is copletely factual, and if you would like evidence of the Royal British Artist's fact, then feel free to pay for a subscription to docstoc.com and download:
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/164530522/Annual-Exhibition-2012-The-Royal-Society-of-British-Artists
Kind regards,
KingAresIV | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0c7ca5e56942df8f | However, TLC is the one that listed it. By the way Bloggers website is not a libable website for the show listing. TLC is more of libable website. Alaska is part of the season one epsiode not special. Along with the Halloween espiode is part of the season 2 epsiode. TLC website is one of the show's libable sites. I am going to change it back. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0c827af0c606a090 | WANKERS
only on wikipedia
eat your fucking american ego | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
0c8291fff5ec8cea | It's a reasonable question. Her birth name is given, and Gurumayi is not in it. I believe it is a title, but want to be sure. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0c9460dbd10fdb27 | I'd like to call your bluff, since I friggin know these people or came across them in one way or another. I have relatives in the business and try to list the stuff as best as could.Rocky | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0c9957b68152fa20 | "
Help Please! An evil Wikipedia editor attacks aviation pioneers Coanda and Vuia constantly TAB
Unfortunately, an evil Wikipedia editor (who uses a multitudes of names ( Romanianlies, Romaniantruths, Binksternet, Soundofmusicals, Andy Dingley, GraemeLeggett, BilCat, ... ) and is also in the Bord of Editors, so he has more power on Wikipedia that an ordinary contributor) has been attacking for more than three years various aviation pioneers, amongst others Traian Vuia and Henri Coanda, for unknown reasons. TAB
In general, as soon as he sees the two names in Wikipedia articles he immediately adds the word ""unsuccessful"" and other unjustified bad characterizations, multiple times.TAB
TABTAB
Any attempt to delete these unfair remarks always fails and the user who dare to confront Romanianlies gets suspended.TAB
TABTAB
Something has to be done. If you have an idea feel free to share it. This man is paid with donations from Wikipedia supporters and he simply abuses his position and denigrates, at will and with no justifications, personalities that he does not like.TABTAB
The last contribution of this evil man (under the name BilCat) was at this page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aircraft_engine
where he added the word ""unsuccessful"" in connection with Coanda-1910 plane/engine making it the only unsuccessful thing in a large list of engines." | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0c99acb068fbae6d | "
Vandalism by User Sitush
You have removed large chunks of materiel from the Singahi article on spurious grounds. As an Independent Wikepedia investigator I have historically examined several of your edits and there seems a certian lack of integrity to your character. I use harsh words here, take for instance (and one can not hide anything in wikipedia The Singhai article you said you did not believe the cited sources and removed large parts of the article. Well the article was cited with proper academic rigor, and its up to you now to go into the sources. I have done so and verified the sources of this article. Now the question remains why you chose to edit this article and what did you not like about it. I suspect and I need to built a case via an investigation on all your Wikipedia edits, is that you are following a political agenda and would like to see a distortion of Indian History. The sang Parivar or RSS also follows this agenda and several users and administrators have been banned from Wikipedia after their peers investigated.
The Guardians of the articles in Wikipedia are the users themselves along with the transparency of all edits which undergo a peer review.
I am sorry Sitush you have failed this peer review. Moreover I suspect the accolades and the praise on your user page is similariry manufactured by yourself and your friends
That's a serious case of not assuming WP:GOODFAITH. Calling good faith edits ""vandalism"" is not appreciated around here... -Let's talk!
I think I'm going to call myself a Independent Wikipedia investigator, I like that title...although Guardians of the articles is also pretty sweet. Read! Talk!
. Thank you for the laugh. Whenever I see your name, I will think Guardian of the articles
The original post has been added to the . | talk .
Yes I have been also examining the work of Sitush and he has been a great pain in the ... for those editors who are trying to do useful work writing well cited academic articles.
Sitush! the Wikipedia community has lost patience in you, I first felt sorry for you but after looking at your various edits I feel you have only brought this on yourself, this public shaming and criticism, please learn from your more academically experienced Wikipedia peers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0c9b60f7711b7617 | "
two things
I think the index article is a fine idea. I'm also working on , which may be of interest to you. NYer " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0c9b94c377f26de4 | "
No reason why you want to divert the FACT in BWF website, and that is nothing to discuss.
Talking about the fair...Did you learn the consensus of Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Badminton#Super Series Tournament Brackets? Or Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Chinese)#Romanization of names, perhaps Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Korean)#Given name. You are violating the manual of style and perhaps the consensus reached, don't talk about fair if you think your editing style is fine. f1 " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0c9eef1291980b06 | Do you know someone who is? I can't just let the anti-EDers try to keep this clearly sourcable site deleted. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ca0b2d195ba386a | Clerk note: Would you be able to log in as Zakkenroller confirming this request? If so, it will be processed as soon as a 'crat can do it. demize (t · c)
Indented line
This is zakkenroller. I am consenting to the usurpation request of prettyboyfloyd. PBF. Both are my own usernames. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ca1a06fe9c569bc | "
Mulatto
While many understand that with a black dad and white mom, Obama44 is not black but is a mulatto, the picture that goes with this article also clearly shows that Bernanke is not fully Jewish if he has thar background but his darker skin indicates a mulatto, perhaps an Arab. Esp, as the Jewish race is white.
Many also understand, that most felt the ""slick"" Greenspan entirely deserved his Mexican sobriquet of the ""Mexican Hairless"" as he entirely looked like then and now a clone of the Mexican Gernal Zoopato and a hairless chiquahua at the same time.
coifed 69.121.221.97 " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ca80d34ae9bf37e | Further reading
Nash's garbage book is in the further reading page, but Guralnick's masterpiece isn't? Seriously? He's the definitive biographer on the subject of Elvis Presley, and he's not in the further reading section? Someone fix this mistake, as fast as possible. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0cadf4112dd7de7a | It should be left the way it was, unless more people start asking the same thing. It gives people the chance to seek information, without asking and waiting, even at this early of a time. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0caf5583c0071606 | Everyone has his own views. Here, on the talk page, in some of my posts I adapted to the level of discussion presented by the users I responded to. And then, the statement could include a POV. But in the Article, in the section I created, there are only pure facts, no POV. Regards, | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0cb54c0c2ff20a83 | "
""The Black mamba is almost as deadly as the Cobra, but the Cobra can kill people 5 times faster than the mamba"" - This sentence seems highly dubious to me. It is inconsistent with the Black Mamba page and not supported by the citations that follow it, neither of which contains any direct comparison of cobra vs. mamba envenomation. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0cb6c23ff78c371e | Global domain international
Can you provide sources to back up the claims made in this article? I have a number of concerns regarding it's accuracy. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0cb80120c13064bc | WHAT A LOAD OF CRAP YOU WRITE. | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
0cbb12ed33403d9c | "
Feel free to use the word ""consensus"", but it's certainly not unanimous. The majority of translations do render it as God, sure. That doesn't mean it's correct, but that's not article worthy. Same for John 1:18, where many translations say Son instead of God, Phil 2:6, where the difference between ""form"" and ""nature"" makes a huge difference, and so on. There is mention made in the article about the references being up for discussion as to their meaning. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0cbc9d42941e3adb | No. The comments are completely relevant to this article. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0cbe106fd0e1e7db | Reply
This isn't about me takin offence.Its that you said it on the deletion page and not a talk page, it puts doupt on the
integrety of my nomination when you say things like that.I was simply responding to what you said, because it wasn't fair to say things about me for everyone else to think.I am well aware of Wikipedia policies, I just have that particular opinion.
And you didn't even notice that I was right on the 2 other articles I nominated for deletion, especially the Death of Anna Nicole Smith article because that was deleted because her death had no sighnifigance, like I was pointing out,unlike the death of Adolf Hitler for example who is a historically important person. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0cc0cd5c0450411c | A sentiment for you...
Fuck off, you giant twat. 82.19.59.30 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0cc57a0bbf82777a | (Multivariable Mean Value Theorem)====
Let be a function of n variables and let have continuous first partial derivatives with respect to all variables in some closed ball about the point . Then g(\overrightarrow{x})-g(\overrightarrow{p})= | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0cc5c203c3df9882 | In this case one could say that it is a primary source because Stephen McIntyre's opinions and ideas are a large part of what this controvery is about. What matters is if the source gives relevant information regarding the controversy, not whether the information is correct from a scientific point of view. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0cc767ead26a3759 | do not tell me to delete stuff you stinker!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
0ccc9a0ead09ba9e | Hi JPS, I have the same problem as Gungadin, I think. For my image, Image:Bensonnbc.jpg, I gave the copyright notice, as well as the URL where I found the picture, and yet you've tagged it. Have I missed something? Thanks! - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0cd70564f8383b19 | "
Informal mediation at Nazism
Hi TFD, this is Mr. Stradivarius from the dispute resolution noticeboard. If it's not too much trouble, would you be willing to comment in the informal mediation thread that I started at Talk:Nazism#Informal mediation? As one of the main contributors to the article, we really need your input to have a good chance of resolving the issues there. All the best. — ♫ " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0cd9183fa4fcde6f | "
The tank losses extremely biased
The Indian tank losses are exaggerated at atleast 175 tanks this means some Pakistani wants to believe that even more than 200 Indian tanks were destroyed. And the Pakistani tanks losses are put at minimal 200 tanks. The original source is US library which i dont consider as neutral at all considering the fact that US was a supporter of Pakistan. The losses dont reflect the fact that Pakistan lost almost all major battles of ""Khem Karan"", ""Phillora"",""Burki"" and even at Chawinda according to pakistan general himself pakistan lost 34 tanks(india claim 57tanks) on the other hand Pakistan exaggerate its claim to 120 tanks(India accept only 29 tanks) more importantly at Khem Karan and Phillora Indian army put on display some 100 tanks at khem karan and 58 tanks at phillora then how is it that pakistan losses are mere 200 and Indian losses ""Atleast 175"" a complete lie.
Spencer C Tucker one of the most renowned military historian puts pakistan losses at 300 tanks(Indian claimed 494 tanks) and Indian losses at 150 tanks(Pakistan claimed 290tanks).
http://books.google.co.in/books?id=N481TmqiSiUC&pg;=PA172&lpg;=PA172&dq;=pakistan+tank+losses+1965&source;=bl&ots;=O9UCZHbyUs&sig;=-oILZn-csKxRzDXKPkNF3-dGEPY&hl;=en&sa;=X&ei;=rZsOUPWhENHirAfzuIDoBg&ved;=0CFUQ6AEwBzgK#v=onepage&q;=pakistan%20tank%20losses%201965&f;=false
All the Indian editors plz focus on this the neutral losses are represnted by US figures which i think are biased and further Spencer C Tucker is also one of the most renowned historian , even Stanley Wolpart and Jeremy Black made it clear that at the end of war Indian Army has Twice the number of tanks(Pakistan started with more tanks when war started).
All the Indian editors must raise this issue as some pakistani editors think that by peddling lies they will win the 1965 war.
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0cdaeb951401100e | ", 20 June 2014 (UTC)
Please read the discussion. To repeat ""The historical statehood narrative recalls that the Vojna Krajina[Military frontier] galvanised Croatian national sentiment by providing a focus for political mobilisation"". Also, I dismiss your ad hominem attack. 19:00" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0cdc1678b9d4094c | Stop vanadalising
I have now done what you could have done instead of deleting an entire referenced paragraph - editied it. In future, edit, don't delete whole paragraphs. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ce290b5c8c3ab55 | Hypocrisy
If I removed everything that doesn't have a source on WP, there goes half your site! Ironic! But the sad thing is, it's sourced to numerous publications.
PS.. Clearly you didn't take my advice with the ice pick. Oh what a shame.
207.161.182.225 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0ce32a51be943eeb | This is not a forum. Sorry, but you might wanna take your message elsewhere. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0cee415b8c30b4ee | Roux I didn't even read what you have put above, it's getting to the point of TOO MUCH TEXT. Have you ever thought of actually contributing to this page instead of deleting everything? I think the page would be extremely interested on you ADDING content. Do you work by the way? Are you at work right now - how are you able to scan this page in real time? I'm logging off because I have to go. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0cf138b4965c959c | Beech Species
Is there any reason why this article, Mexican Beech, and Oriental Beech are titled by their common names, unlike the Japanese Beech and the Taiwan Beech which go by their scientific names? I'm no dendrologist, but it seems totally inconsistent with the rest of the wikipedia's articles on trees. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0cfde89d1928e229 | I declare this GAR closed. No more comments for over a month. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0d04e80f0fc3d30a | Move proposal
Please see Talk:Red vs Blue#Requested move for discussion. — :Talk | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0d08ec8659eec89a | "
Followup on Abed Khan article
Salaam,
I last posted here over two years ago about the English Abed Khan article after I noticed that you had written on the talk page. I've finished sourcing nearly all the claims in the article, but I am missing a bit of information and I had a quick question for you. The section about Khan's broadcast of Jobab Dao in Kolkata is an important one. However, I cannot find any English-language sources for these facts at all! (I have scoured hundreds of Google search results for ""abed khan"", to no avail.) I was wondering whether the Bengali-language Abed Khan article had cited any sources for the claim that Khan broadcasted ""Jobab Dao"" in 1971.
If you don't have the time or aren't able to find anything, that's totally okay. I just thought I'd see if we could track down a source for those claims! Dhonnobad, " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0d0c79ebf0b052d2 | ":I respectfully ask that you discontinue and rollback as there is no consensus for your actions, and will result in BRD to either attain such consensus or show lack of. At the very most, I see 4 editors (one by 2 names) agreeing and 4 not agreeing. This is not consensus. '''' MICHAEL Q.''
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0d0f27678bb8690b | You can 'bar' others but not | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0d0f7abd06f00f7e | Hey, i sense a vanity picture. Whatever, I have no interest in deleting it unless someone can find a clearer picture of an actual snowball fight. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0d1d543ae9557abc | I'd say the Lincoln Blackwood at 15 months is the shortest production run of a non-limited-edition vehicle. The Aztek actually sold pretty well. I'm editing. 17:01, Nov 16, 2004 (UTC) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0d2057f02467b254 | User CJ DUB Continues to Harass Users
The user, CJ DUB, keeps harassing wiki users. I ask that both editors and users act in banning or blocking him. It's about time.
69.86.162.170
Info About Gormaz Being Oldest Castle In Europe
Infomration backed by 4 or 5 solid references that Gormaz Castle it the oldest castle in Europe was deleted. I want to know why this is so, again, when multiple solid references were provided. Was this move done in bias?
69.86.162.170 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0d208bc373192e80 | Mo. Go ahead and delete my account if you want, but Bwilkins is a f***ing Nazi and I have better things to do than waste any more time on a site that allows s*** like him/her to be d***s. | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
0d233dc12ce68884 | "
The problem is not what you're trying to say but how you're going about saying it. Quoting the subject of an article in the form ""She remembers saying..."" is simply not encyclopaedic at all. That was the problem with the first as well. Nothing wrong with saying that she denied her rape had anything to do with her later career choice, but write it like an encyclopaedia article and not a magazine piece or fan page. Similarly with the second one - say it, if it needs to be said, but not like this. Try ""At this time, she stated her intention etc etc [ref]"".
The problem of unencyclopaedic style is present throughout the article. Examples include ""In her autobiography, Massoli writes that"" - why not omit that and put a reference at the end? ""(Preacher has denied this.)"" - why is this sentence in brackets? ""Jameson says..."" - again, more like a magazine article. The list of awards is meaningless, really. It adds nothing to the article. Why not just have a sentence saying ""Her films have won numerous industry awards""?
And finally, the length of the article is not appropriate. There is too much verbosity. Do you really think it's reasonable for an encyclopaedia to give Jenna Jameson as much coverage as Gandhi? " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0d2650b8053d9070 | "I have a feeling that this has to do with something called ""Nerd Rage"" That is when something doesnt follow every single guideline of Wikipedia they say it is an opinion and needs to be removed other wise their editing days will end and everyone will suffer because of it. Next time you put an arguement cite it with modern money mechanics, the book written by the federal reserve in 1913. This book contains all info about the fed being a private organization, and is a legible source. Oh and all of you nerds living in your moms basement trolling wikipedia for things that you dont think are correct... Modern Money Mechanics is a legible source and may be cited as one. Just because there isnt a wikipedia page doesnt make it a false source you tards, stop having ocd attacks. Feel free to reply to this at any time or email me at [email protected], I will be copying this and reposting it daily to prevent editing. 71.55.122.30 Sam Gelman
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0d2973827ed9c799 | " 2005 (UTC)
You would think that, since your aim is to tar the Bible/creationists with the geocentric brush. True NPOV would present both cases adequately. I won't put up with an ideological opponent telling me how much response is enough. It is also a statement of fact that all the alleged proofs of geocentrism in the Bible boil down to the same basic thing, words like ""sunset"", which we use today all the time. And it is common for creationists to discuss the frame of reference when discussing the issue, so this is essential to mention in the interest of fairly representing this viewpoint. Also, it was an excellent change to use a modern Bible translation, 138 any objections to this? 07:55, 1 Apr" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0d2abab8283182f2 | "Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. desat " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0d2c58ddd9b2f9e8 | "
Volunteer Marek at AN/I.
You closed the thread with the words ""Take the discussion to the article talk page"". That's no solution. There is bullying and POV pushing there. Volunteer Marek is one of the biggest offenders. His POV is obvious in almost everything he writes (which shouldn't be the case). He is perennially present. He owns that article. And he does all he can to prevent another views having any impact on the article, It's been that way since the incident in July. Discussion on the the Talk page won't fix it. I hardly ever edit there any more due to the unpleasantness and pointlessness of it all. Your closing comment was useless. Volunteer Marek has won, and you helped him to do so. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0d2e5f4ccb3d0ca0 | It was a pretty minor change more in the spirit of hyphen-twiddling than an actual copyedit. Reading the article now, I don't see any huge problems with it; I haven't checked the talk page and article history to see if any of those comments still apply. I always like to know how many of something were sold, and when they stopped selling them; that would be worth adding. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0d3471e941038444 | Fruity Pebbles Fan Club?
Why won't it let me add info about the Fruity Pebbles fan club to the Pebbles cereal page? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0d37fc56ac9a1e26 | This needs clarification, OCD is classified as GAD and its treatment is in most cases SSRI used in combination or alone to CBT, on the other hand, when anxiety doesn't appear to have sign of obsessive or compulsive behavior anxiolytic agents are tried, but due to the dependence and the need to increase the dosage, CBT is favoured. But those are not the only treatment, in some cases, when in cases of severe social-phobia, uncontrolable depersonalization/derealization and the patient doesn't respond, atypical anti-psychotics at lower dosage might be tried. Anxiety treatment depending on the severity or the type is a case by case matter, but when taken 'anxiety alone' it is generally known that meanstream treatment includes anxiolytic agents and/or CBT. (ix) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0d3b12e371e34b6f | "
Oh, and plus I didn't expect anyone to review this article for several months, so I figured I should add my name to the queue early. ∴ChatMe! " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0d40c44bac64d649 | Advert Discussion
In May 2009 the Advert tag was applied to the page. To address this issue, I changed the first 3 paragraphs to provide a context of how the mosque is similar and different to other Islamic mosques.
I believe the rest of the article factually describes the art and architecture of the mosque and factually reports what was said by the M. R. Bawa Muhaiyyaddeen about the mosque.
Since the article does promote a commercial enterprise or service I am removing the Advert tag. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0d41ca9f7b0bef91 | "
re Deir Yassin massacre
Hi Fayssal!! Are you as an admin empowered to unprotect the above? It needs wikifying - and other work too. Important article. Cheers.
Hi Judith. Yes i am but it is good practice to contact the admin who protected the article. He's is the one who can better decide if all disputes have been solved at the talk page. If not the second option would be WP:RFPP. Regards. - Wiki me up® " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0d44280ec1b89d5f | LOL WUT THE FACK IS THIS SHITLOL WUT THE FACK IS THIS SHITLOL WUT THE FACK IS THIS SHITLOL WUT THE FACK IS THIS SHITLOL WUT THE FACK IS THIS SHITLOL WUT THE FACK IS THIS SHITLOL WUT THE FACK IS THIS SHITLOL WUT THE FACK IS THIS SHITLOL WUT THE FACK IS THIS SHIT | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0d44877b75e94430 | , 30 April 2009 (UTC)
IN response to a request from LessHeard vanU, I responded on MAtt Yeager's talk page. — 20:51 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0d4a3e067b14eb7f | Scientific American destroys the myth of God and religion. Of course its a reliable source ;). | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0d4c1c3227937b15 | Regarding edits made during August 27 2006 (UTC) to Wikipedia
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0d5016aa001de68c | Your sockpuppet's account is blocked forever
has been blocked indefinitely. I don't understand how a muslim like you can lie in this month of Ramadan. However you have still , so you are very lucky and you can still enjoy. I will not gain anything if the admins block also . I have just discovered that most of List of British Bangladeshis's articles were created from you. (BUT I DO NOT KNOW WHY YOUR BODY TAKES FIRE WHEN I CREATE ARTICLES ABOUT BRITISH BANGLADESHI MUSLIM'S SCHOLAR) From now on try to be a good editor. May Allah give you tawfeeq. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0d529246d6c04480 | why block tha page?
unfair to tose that whant to add stuff about him. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0d5e83849f93e381 | "
Reference improvement
Thanks for the help with SK. Any reason you are not using the authorlink parameter? example | reply here " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0d64f2c125564c9a | from thewolfstar
I did some research on the Scarborough and Lori Klausutis situation. I came up with some interesting information, indeed, and have edited the arcticle accordingly. It looks like there is need for an investigation, but Scarborough's part isn't what warrants the investigation. Scarborough, if I'm correct is the fall guy here. Please check these links (only a few) that are available.
http://www.tomflocco.com/fs/911WidowQuestions.htm
http://www.truthout.org/docs_01/01.05B.Klausutis.1.htm
http://www.americanpolitics.com/20030721Baker.html | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0d6954447c434db0 | "There's no separate ""Guernsey nationality"". There is no Guernsey nationality law. The law which applies is the United Kingdom's British Nationality Act 1981 (formallly, ""as extended to the Island(s) by Order-in-Council).
People from any of the Crown Dependencies within the British Islands are full British Citizens. Guersney people may have their passports issued in London, and people from London (if they happen to be in the Island at the time of application) can have their passports issued in St Peter Port. The only distinction which exists (which is of little practical consequence) is that a minority of people from the Crown Dependencies have restricted EU free movement rights, under the provisions of Protocol 3 to the treaty of Rome.
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0d799d6fe8908ce7 | >> I kind of agree. There has to be a distinction between Spaniards and Hispanic. And, one should be careful in assuming white hispanics, since there is no such thing as a white hispanic. Hispanic is a non-racial cultural classification. It does not include any racial spectrum. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0d7bc7d8d3e464a5 | hey everyone turn up turn up | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0d83c3b95bc70e7a | "==Speedy delete==
I'm not sure what metric was used to identify this article as ""blatant advertising"". The article appears to address an important biological phenomena and has inline references for many of the claims. This is a new editor making quite a reasonable start, what ever happened to WP:NOBITE? The article probably should merged into IGFBP7 and the section on editing there expanded. Similar with many of the new articles, especially GABRA3 RNA Editing and GABRA3, where an extensive RNA editing section was already in place. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0d8c3b437be2ac63 | "
Thanks, I've sorted that out. As it was part of a multi-article nomination, only the first article was dealt with by the script I use! I need to remember to check this kind of thing. Incidentally, there would have been no problem with you dealing with this (after all, the link to the AfD is there - and you could have also linked to the AfD in the summary). Regards, ''''''''''/talk|contribs\ " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0d8e2de57b2fdbaf | His recent selection to the MLS All-Star squad, based on merit (he was not chosen last year), as a 17 year-old would say to reasonable observers that he is far advanced for his age. Sammyj 22 July 2006 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0d8f6440ea72bb21 | Wrong, I am neoconservative, and I hate all Arab countries, especially Saudi Arabia and Iraq. See antisemitism in the Arab world. That is why I hate Arabs. | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
0d96dd0315579b33 | , 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Number 2 07:10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0d9f822dba77fed1 | Warning to me
Why did i get a warning for my edit on Sigmund Freud? The guy was a Jewish supremacists, i can give you many sources to prove it. But let face it: Wikipedia is owned by Jews so it wouldn't matter. | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0da6d7528390359e | Hello. Thanks again for your reply. I am not too concerned about the articles that CRUSIO deleted. It appears to be rather subjective if they appear or do not appear. I would like to focus your attention on the corrections and additions to the Paola S. Timiras, that CRUSIO removed, specifically the addition of the entry for Paul Segall and the correction to the name of the imaging system that was developed and used in the Timiras lab. Please look at the supporting information and let me know if it is lacking in anyway and if so, what else can be added to allow this information to be on the Timiras site.
P.S. If you would like to look into the items that CRUSIO deleted please do so, they are listed above.
Cheers. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0daa0b1c71eaac2b | Hi Jolly Janner. My page was deleted several times upon my request yet my name still appears and is thus listed in the Google index. I would like my name and the deletion log to be fully suppressed at that point in order that no information appears anymore on Wikipedia and Google. Please provide me with with advice or help me contact the appropriate Wikipedia person if you cannot do anything, it has been months that my name appears on Wikipedia and Google and I do not know what to do. I have sent removal request to Google already and they deny them saying that my name was kept on Wikipedia and therefore cannot be removed. Thank you very much for your assistance, regards. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0daef3c97dafa45e | Pityful
So you call Suraye who question your Assyrianist bias as racists and Arab nationalists? so that shows how out of touch you are Sinhareb. khon your kind are as bad as Arab nationalists yourself. | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0db1715cba29136e | ":::::I'm sorry, this just wasn't a very significant moment in my life that I felt necessary to build a forensic ""trail of evidence."" I very much enjoy and appreciate Wikipedia but it's nothing more than something I occasionally pop-in to edit or create an article occasionally. After reviewing your link, it appears my only contribution to this issue was a poorly thought-out side remark to an editor in an unrelated ANI a few months back. I never pursued the matter beyond that, nor did I file a complaint regarding the emails, nor did I even remember it occurred until I logged back on after a few months away to edit an article I'd previously written and found your many messages to me. Please understand:
The ""song and dance"" is not a creature of my conjuring. I am only following up on this short exchange that I barely recall as you escalated the question and have pursued it over a period of several months. However, as I said, I am committed to doing my absolute best to accommodate your interest in this matter (in point of clarification to your above comment, I have to admit I am unaware of other third-party editors who expressed similar passion to you and seem to recall the others involved (IIRC User:NE Ent, User:Dennis Brown, User:TParis) were differently expressive, but if I am wrong then kindly accept that I should have said I am also trying to accommodate their interest as well). As far as I know, it is your interest in pursuing this I am accommodating and the characterization of a ""song and dance"" is not one I feel is appropriate to describe my total ambivalence to your inquiry (please understand - the preceding is not intended to be trite, I simply want to unambiguously communicate that the entire matter is one of no interest to me, so as to assuage any concerns of a ""song and dance"").
I would like to personally apologize to you for not responding to your interrogatories ""forthwith."" I can only give you my personal assurance that I did not leave Wikipedia for two months as part of a scheme to evade your investigation. I know you've said you're incredulous to that notion, but I will offer you this personal assurance anyway.
Kindly accept this post in the spirit in which it was intended - as a frank and direct response to concerns you are expressing - and not as a slight in any way. If I have failed to communicate something here with appropriate finesse, understand it is only because of serious IRL issues I currently face that limit the time I can commit to pursuing online intrigue, and absolutely not because I am trying to scandalize you.
If there is anything else I can help you with, please do not hesitate to let me know, however, in interests of wrapping this up in a succinct manner, I would like to suggest we terminate this back-and-forth and allow ArbCom to do whatever it is their role in this is supposed to be. Best -
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0dbaffe756c9155a | "
You know that the name change is not at all the whole point here. The problems here such as heavily relying on Chinese sources, inaccuracy in historical facts, copying government propaganda, are commonplace not only in this particular article but most all topics on nations colonized under China. And further, if the current situation continues on Wikipedia, you cannot guarentee the so called NPOV. Not only that will be a joke, the whole Wikipedia thing will end up being another hypocratic, ""civilization"" game. The biggest issue here is the mentality behind the creation of these articles and problems here, hence the debate and this is just the beginning. You have to realize that the overwhelming articles on China-occupied regions on Wikipedia are full of POV but not NPOV. So don't keep fulling yourselves. It's time to wake up now.
Those who're currently in advantageous positions here, are so not because they're intelectually and morally strong but just because their numbers are bigger. They are basically consisted of two types: One types are those Chinese who're either been brainwashed and/or are chauvinistic fanatics. And the other types are Americans who (naturally) have so little knowledge about the world outside of northern America. But then they would have hard time admitting that and therefore, they will end up either pretending as they know or they would simply echo the Chinese POV which is largely circulated and readily available. For them, the famous saying, which goes like if you repeat a lie a thousand times it would become the truth, will make perfect sense. That ""truth"", or what you guys are shouting here as ""the common"" names and stuff, is exactly what is blocking not only your eyesights but as well your human consciousness.
One big difference between the two types though are that the Chinese here do know what they are doing because they have their agenda and they're intentional. But the Americans are just naive and are being used.
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0dbc2c2780078a51 | If what you say is true, then why did you not put a link to this supposed news article then? I edit for myself and the overall betterment of Wikipedia only. Lee just happens to be one of the articles I monitor for inaccuracies. Contributions to this article, as with any Wikipedia article, are acceptable as long as you are making claims that can be proven. If Paul Conn is under investigation by the IRS then undoubtedly there would be some form of proof, some where on the internet you could link to the article. Even if he was under investigation, that information would be something that should be primarily placed on the Paul Conn article, and not Lee's. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0dbf51280248f31c | CALL ME ANYTIME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. AT 512 673 8448. PLEASE DONT BLOCK ME, JUST CALL ME SO I CAN ASK YOU SOMETHING. THANKS, ROSS WILLIAMS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0dbf9ce6337b66e8 | BOO HOO TELL EVERYONE WHAT I DID - CANT FIGHT YOUR OWN BATTLES!!! PATHETIC BABY!! | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
0dc1033fb9467fd2 | Wesley Bartz likes to suck cock. Loves that cock. He can't live without the cock | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
0dc1a36f6704a20f | "
Ah. It appears that article isn't free, so i'll have to leave it to you if you have access? — '''''' Talk? " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0dc1fa436e282cc3 | Police violence
Am I the only one who is disturbed by on some of the Media coverage of the protest and police action. The news I saw described Chinese police are beating protesters, even to the point of bleeding, yet, I found out the footage shown was actually in “Nepal”. I was watching news coverage of the protest in Tibet, and saw police chasing Buddhist monks with sticks and beating them with it, and monks and civilians covered with blood. I thought the bahavior of the police were disgusting, yet later I saw the same footages and photos of those polices on the internet, but the description is that those police beating and protests were actually happening in Nepal and not in Tibet. It looks very similar to images of Tibet, but I don’t know why the Television media would pass these images for Tibet protest though.207.69.139.142 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0dc8be9ceed80ccf | BTW, THERE ARE OVER 100,000 register republicans in the 6th so back of your psyco delusions that evey person that edits on Roskam bio is a sock... YOU DUMB FUCKS ARE WITH OUT CONTROL and are totally IN A ZONE OF EVIL. | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.