Datasets:
tasksource
/
jigsaw_toxicity

Dataset card Data Studio Files Community
1
id
stringlengths
16
16
comment_text
stringlengths
6
5k
toxic
int64
0
1
severe_toxic
int64
0
1
obscene
int64
0
1
threat
int64
0
1
insult
int64
0
1
identity_hate
int64
0
1
23ef174027dde462
" I have changed around the article quite a bit and removed some info from ""Giggle Loop"". If somebody wants to add it back then go ahead but I thought it was unnecessary. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
23f3102df5425d2d
That statement has no substance - It has been estimated that somewhere in the range of 2 to 3 million Chinese died as part of the centuries-long project of building the wall. Needs to be removed as well.
0
0
0
0
0
0
23f345f72ea3fbfe
What you've put looks great and I will not change it - you've got the essence of what I was trying to explain in the article and the reference clarifies these points. Thanks.
0
0
0
0
0
0
23f37d86da0832f6
Such notations are indeed of interest in the theory of surreal numbers; they are called gaps. Let the class of surreal numbers S=L∪R, and for every l∈L,r∈R: ll]}; R={r: r is a positive infinite number}. L={l: l is a negative, or zero, or a positive infinitesimal number [i.e. for every positive real number x: x>l]}; R={r: r is a non-infinitesimal positive number }. (Of course, such notations are not surreal numbers.) -
0
0
0
0
0
0
23f6d004bfd9ed1d
Hi ur are free to add pictures and details
0
0
0
0
0
0
23fab5d434fa0f41
" == Congratulations! It's my pleasure to let you know that, consensus being reached, you are now an administrator. You should read the relevant policies and other pages linked to from the administrators' reading list before carrying out tasks like deletion, protection, banning users, and editing protected pages such as the Main Page. Most of what you do is easily reversible by other sysops, apart from page history merges and image deletion, so please be especially careful with those. You might find the new administrators' how-to guide helpful. Cheers! | explains it all ® Congratulations on a well-deserved promotion, Lucky. Use it for the good! ;-) (talk) 02:02, August 10, 2005 (UTC) Congratulations from me too, Lucky, you're one of the most deserving I've ever seen. Best wishes, (talk) And more congrats from me! As I said on your RfA, it's about time, too. And I'm thrilled to see you decide to stay after all. (spill yours?) Stay? · Talk 02:41, August 10, 2005 (UTC)]] Lucky: I saw what all went on today while I was out (why do all these things always happen while I am offline?) and I just wanted to drop by and leave a note for you. I hope that the restoration of your pages, and your promotion is a sign that you're still with us. I'd hate to see an excellent contributor lost. If there's anything I can do for you, let me know. · Talk 02:02, August 10, 2005 (UTC) Yes, I echo Essjay's sentiments. Of course, Lucky didn't exactly ask for me to undelete his talk page, I'm sure it was in all of our best interests ) Congratulations on your promotion. Now go fix the 'Pedia and let's move past this whole fiasco! ·t 02:15, August 10, 2005 (UTC) Thanks be to God, you're still with us! I agree with Joy (below); I was on pins and needles waiting to see if you were going to stay. Now that you have, have an award! · Talk 02:41, August 10, 2005 (UTC) Il n'y a pas de quoi. I'm glad to have been of help, and I assure you, if I need any, I'll be coming your way. I'm honored to be able to proclaim that now you're a trollslayer too! · Talk 05:23, August 10, 2005 (UTC) Yes, please do stay. Although I added my oppose vote to your RFA after you had already been promoted (though I didn't know that then), I am happy that you were promoted. If that can convince you to stay, that's a great win for Wikipedia. — I am truly beyond words. Thank you for your support! I promise that I won't let you down. - I'm glad you see it that way! And I'm certain you will err on the side of caution now that you're an admin. — I am so very very happy for you! Congratulations! I've been on pins and needles. (talk) 02:22, August 10, 2005 (UTC) Congrats! Wow! Congrats, Lucky! That must have been hard for you: three bureaucrats, numerous deletions, threats, and postings. I don't think I would stay after four bad RfAs. Well, now you've got the prize. I know we haven't worked much together here on Wikipedia, but I've seen your work all over the place. Here's a mop; welcome to the topp-sekrit cabal! Cheers, talk 5 pillars 02:27, August 10, 2005 (UTC) Congrats and hang around There's some cool old folks coming back, and things are a bit choppy while
0
0
0
0
0
0
23fc15ce884f552a
" This article is nominated for the below mentioned actions. I assure and challenge that not even a single tag is placed wrong. All who are well known of Pakistan and then Frontier Province's politics will themselves knows the ""childish"" behaviour of this article. I wish to re-write this article personally. Pleqase help me."
0
0
0
0
0
0
23fe99ce93b6aeef
PS: the battle over your userpage disparagement has made the Wikipedia Review. Congratulations.
0
0
0
0
0
0
2400ea5a786a3e7d
" Srebrenica Massacre The protection notice says that the protection is because of ""disputes"" and that protection ""does not endorse a particular version"" - that seems to serve as a reasonable NPOV notice. If you think that discussion with GP won't be productive, for whatever reason, you can bring the matter up on RfC, Mediation, or (as a last resort) arbitration. Simply reverting each other until one person gives up isn't going to solve the problem, hence the protection. — Kate Turner | Talk 19:33, 2004 Oct 8 (UTC)"
0
0
0
0
0
0
2405b14938eed8be
" Time to reactivate the Well, it has been a while since I have last asked you, however, it is definately time to reactivate it. There are so many GIF images that need to be converted to PNG. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
240675961262e226
Terraria stupid editor you no shit about terraria fucker!!!
1
1
1
0
1
0
240846b11729f851
"=1981 Brixton riot=== I note that in the quote from Armstrong where she says ""You are not a stranger to riots yourself, I understand, are you? You have taken part in them yourself."", the word riots has been linked to 1981 Brixton riot. As I indicated in my edit summary when I removed this link, I don't think it is appropriate to link to that page since we don't know whether Armstrong was referring to that incident. I note that a number of references have been added to support the view that Armstrong was referring to the 1981 Brixton riots yet I don't see that they do. Armstrong said nothing further in the interview to suggest she was referring to 1981 and looking at the references, they don't seem to say Armstrong was referring to 1981 either. I note that the article says that Howe ""was arrested and tried for riot, affray and assault"" in 1970. Considering that, I think it is difficult for us to assume Armstrong was referring to 1981. =="
0
0
0
0
0
0
240b76e6eaff2857
Hello, I've reverted your latest edit of the ManU-Arsenal article because no consensus has been reached in the discussion at WP:FOOTY and I think you should wait until this has been achieved before trying to impose your view on the article. I note that you have performed what amount to four edit reverts yesterday and today. I think this is out of order given that the matter is subject to discussion. Please be patient.
0
0
0
0
0
0
241034eaee3fa768
The misleading map Ladies and gentlemen, I find the map at the top of the article nice but totally misleading, considering the fact that it is in Russian and doesn't indicate the mine itself. If the contributor who added it is willing to help, he'd better redesign the image keeping only the city and the names of the oblast and the countries. The real need here is for a collage of world map showing Ukraine and Ukraine's map indicating Donetsk (like those graphics in TV newscasts). Thanks,
0
0
0
0
0
0
241973438cb9290f
I have always been discussing; unfortunately discussion does not always resolve things. But sure, I'm ready to suspend reverts so long as Darkness Shines does.
0
0
0
0
0
0
241bf3dde0cd51b3
" HOY Thanks, you are correct about the dead link. I forgot about that option. PRAISE "
0
0
0
0
0
0
2423fbb8ea202977
Michelle Arvizu Hi, I'm not sure if Michelle Arvizu really qualified for A7 deletion. Technically speaking, it didn't assert notability, but her IMDB looked okay.
0
0
0
0
0
0
242bd38da7ad9c1a
Material about the program has been inserted into the hijackers section, where I think it fits best, with some additional information and better wording.
0
0
0
0
0
0
242c26d999edf640
" Title Why isn't the o in ""over"" capitalised per the single cover? Should this be moved to ""A Bridge Over You""? "
0
0
0
0
0
0
2431a78169dd15e1
" Just like the hate-filled quote that was used ""the plethora of attempts to relate apiru (Habiru) to the gentilic (i.e. biblical word) ibri are all nothing but wishful thinking."" Talk about hate speech and a grand attempt to belittle anyone that believe the Bible. This is typical high-nose stuck up ""I'm a Atheist so I'm sooooooooo much better and smarter then you knuckle dragging believers"" load of BS. It needs to be removed at once. but I know it won't be removed. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
243a13430078ad22
Thanks for taking the time to read my request, I will edit articles that I personally have knowledge about and quote independent verifiable sources. I won't get into arguments which waste everyone's time. I will be productive
0
0
0
0
0
0
243d5a22fa343dfc
" General statistics about Egypt's lack of religious freedom, properly sourced, is of course highly relevant and appropriate - I don't think a serious ""undue"" argument can be made against something like "" in terms of religious freedom, Egypt ranks as the fifth worst country in the world, after Saudi Arabia, Iran, Uzbekistan and China.http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=49738http://pewforum.org/docs/?DocID=491http://pewforum.org/newassets/images/reports/restrictions/restrictionsfullreport.pdf In addition, Egypt ranks among the 12 worst countries in the world in terms of religious violence against religious minorities and in terms of social hostilities against Christians.http://pewforum.org/docs/?DocID=491http://pewforum.org/newassets/images/reports/restrictions/restrictionsfullreport.pdf"", when top level country articles are always full of such rankings - indeed, even the ""Egypt"" article has its rankings on human rights , from Freedom house. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
243ec40f84bbcbec
Most people do not need a Wiki page to feel complete. Envy, that is rich. An Entrepreneur that built an Award winning Luxury resort that brought international tourist dollars, local jobs, and tax revenues to the Hudson Valley vs an unemployed amateur environmental activist.
0
0
0
0
0
0
2441ea6af3c96467
REDIRECT User talk:Danbarnesdavies/Sandbox 1
0
0
0
0
0
0
244770e8fde71aef
Dear Hindu friend: Thank you for your contribution, though I guess it's idle to tell people the truth when they are not willing to know it. WE Roma have shown them what OUR culture is, YOU Indians do the same, but THEY, the non-Roma and non-Indian, but pseudo-intellectuals, will insist in holding their ridiculous theories. By the way, I respect Hinduism, I simply made clear that our religious heritage has nothing to do with it.
0
0
0
0
0
0
244a624b143b7fd7
there is this racist troll called Kansas Bear.i call him Kansas the arm taker.this moron is supported by foreign government agencies . a person like this has no place in wikipedia. racist groups should not be in wikipedia at all. he is stupid troll . when you see him just report him right away
0
0
1
0
1
0
244b25084e2894ff
David Shankbone is traumatizing notable authors David Shankbone's attitude toward authors who don't like the photos he's taken of them is bossy and bullying. He takes disastrous photos of authors. Taking more unflattering photos could hardly be possible (See Edmund White, A.M. Homes, Francine Prose, Kathryn Harrison, Mary Gaitskill). It's gotten to the point that authors he hasn't assaulted yet with his camera are afraid to go to readings for fear he'll be there, waiting for them. I don't spend much time on Wikipedia, but when I come upon an author's page with a terrible photo, I now know it's been taken by David Shankbone. I became curious about how these authors felt about the photos he'd taken of them, so I went and looked back in the history of a couple of them. First I checked in the history of A.M. Homes, and sure enough, someone tried to take down the Shankbone photo (possibly even A.M. Homes herself or someone close to her), saying it was not a good photo, and he repeatedly put it back. I also looked in the history of Sharyn November, and she herself had an exchange with him on one of their talk pages saying she preferred another photo of herself instead, but he would not let her have her way, and I don't remember the details, but his attitude was unpleasant and bossy. She quickly backed down sweetly. A few days ago I came upon yet another disastrous author photo by David Shankbone and decided to Google his name, because I've been thinking that sooner or later an article will inevitably come out in the print media about authors' frustrations with this offensive photographer. I wanted to see if any articles had been published yet about it. I didn't dig very deeply but did find that on February 18th, 2008, lots of Wikipedia editors wrote about their frustrations with David Shankbone (in a section called: Does Wikipedia want David Shankbone or should we just tell him to leave?), to the point that he promised he'd leave Wikipedia (he shouldn't make promises he won't keep-he didn't even leave for one day, as far as I can see from his list of contributions). All those posts from upset people have been deleted from Wikipedia, but I was able to find them by going into the history of the page: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Authors are not the only celebrities Shankbone has upset. I came upon discussions (on Wikipedia) about the actor Mike Farrell, who was upset by the photo Shankbone took of him, but Shankbone insisted his photo stay up on Farrell's page (it has now been replaced by a much better photo taken by someone else). And I'm sure it's happened to countless other “notables”. Many notable authors who are distressed by their photo will just remain quiet and try not to look at their Wikipedia pages, either because they don't know how to take down photos and post messages on Wikipedia, or because they fear that fighting David Shankbone will be futile and will only increase their distress. Authors are often shy and insecure about their physical appearance. Why make it worse? And why be stubborn and nasty about it to the few authors who do muster up the courage to request that an unflattering photo be taken down? As with any contributor to Wikipedia, David Shankbone should have no right to assert that his photos take precedence over the photos of others, especially when more appropriate pictures are available and copyright free. He claims that he has allowed better pictures to take the place of his, but this is clearly not true in many instances, given the way he fights to retain his pictures even in instances when any reasonable third party observer would agree that another picture is either better or more appropriate for the article. David Shankbone might be using Wikipedia to try and make a career for himself, and maybe that's okay, but he's hurting a lot of people along the way. I am an author, with a few published books, and there is a page on me on Wikipedia. That's why I care about this issue. I'm appalled at what David Shankbone is doing to authors. As I don't know the best place to post this message, I'm posting it in three places: David Shankbone's talk page, Jimbo Wales' talk page, and Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
0
0
0
0
0
0
2455389369b05894
youtube link? the peaches video parody has a youtube link as well. The my farts video has over half a million views.
0
0
0
0
0
0
24560e8aac97c108
Just forward to a supervisor please, I don't have time for your cat and mouse games. Thank you
0
0
0
0
0
0
24566d3ba647e7a2
When are you going to learn that a definition should only be accurate and correct, and has nothing to do with narrow-minded? You should read your crap out loud and hear how bad it sounds. University libraries and journal search tools? Are you serious? Like I'm going to find plenty of people reviewing the latest LP that had a few hundred copies pressed (at best) when it came out. I don't have little distro order forms from the early 90's either. Those things usually contain little descriptions of bands/albums. Even if I did, you wouldn't take them as legit sources anyway as you would delete anything like that if I edited this topic. You don't let anyone skew from the word of Greenwald. What's Greenwald have on other people with websites? His crap has an ISBN number to it? Big deal. You already shot down fourfa.com. What makes Greenwald better than Andy Radin or Ben Gook's 2002 article (http://www.furious.com/perfect/emo.html)? Why mention Blush when he gets referenced 3 times and clearly is not someone that's written about emo other than filling out the 80's hardcore scene history by briefly mentioning the Revolution Summer. Maybe I'll write a book, self-publish 5 copies, make a website to promote it, then I can fix this garbage up. Of course after all that hard work you'd just delete it anyway because you love pushing the agenda of lies here.
1
0
0
0
0
0
24572ee036e07e5f
Looks like someone already did...
0
0
0
0
0
0
24576e5648030cba
Single-purpose account warning
0
0
0
0
0
0
245b23be4f06b932
" We can dismiss claims about role of Lileikis, as he being head of branch wasn't in position to make changes in organization. It is strange that names of department directors are provided for all departments, except ""Communists, Ethnic Minorities, Jews and others"" department, and from that sentence it is not clear was ""Communists, Ethnic Minorities, Jews and others"" one department or many. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
245e08f2c1235863
February 2014 (UTC) Official confirmation given. 220.245.146.235 18:16, 6
0
0
0
0
0
0
24609f168c0d0b0e
" CST I tried to fix part of this article but got reverted and labeled as ""proactive"" (which is interpreted to mean in favour of child abuse). I am not willing to engage with this editor. Is it possible that you could analyse the situation and come back with an opinion? 77.243.225.87 "
0
0
0
0
0
0
2465df61277c0934
Today's high-quality journalism. I am scratching my head as to how to edit this article.
0
0
0
0
0
0
246f513ff16cadbd
" Thanks Luna, I really appreciate it. You're the reason why Wikipedia has the most nicest and great communities on the internet. Happy editing! (Talk) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
247273081fc6a812
What's Your Problem? What Did I Do? Huh? and here's your image shack: (http://img838.imageshack.us/content_round.php?page=done&l;=img838/8128/till.png&via;=mupload) BTW I PROVIDED A RELIABLE RESOURCE WHICH YOU IGNORED!!!!!!! I'm reverting your edit. eitehr Contribute/Improve or Leave as Is.
1
0
0
0
0
0
2472b7f41bc6cc72
Split up When did they split up? 1999 was the last single release ever. Probably disestablished in 2000?
0
0
0
0
0
0
247581fc832865e9
LOL FAVONIAN http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Anal_Fisting.jpg I HAVE FOUND PICTURE OF YOU!!!
0
0
0
0
0
0
2477c4e0eb76b2ed
I'm rather leaning towards Damel as the primary name. But I didn't think the move should have been done without a longer and more collegial discussion. I see a number of Gbook results for Damelis , but possibly more for Damel . It can be hard to determine how many Gbooks are in English. Sometimes they have EN abstracts or forewords or whatever. I would like to see consensus here before the move - MK?.
0
0
0
0
0
0
247864a6eb16b167
" Moderator offer I'd love to be a moderator; however, if turning me into one causes too much stress and work, then I'd rather you don't for your sake. But if there is an opening, sure! P.S. Also, I like the edit summaries; especially the Rammstein. P o And I noticed that my Awards page has been going around a bit. Nice to see that my evil plan for world domination on Wikipedia is working. >:) o '''Note: These were posted above, but I think you missed them as they were hidden away."
0
0
0
0
0
0
2478dad3bc5b01e5
" Christian wikis BhaiSaab, the notability will come with time. The site is new. Watch out for a page on ""Wikis on Islam"" and good luck on the ""deconstruction"" of that page because a page Christian wikis already exists. I thought that you'd like to know that this article has been deleted. BhaiSaab talk "
0
0
0
0
0
0
247977a0bea229ec
This appears to have been addressed by , whose attention to this is appreciated.
0
0
0
0
0
0
247bfaedc2d2057f
Yes, parochial is when someone tries to enforce their own locally valid norms on a community governed by another set of norms pertaining to other localities which they make no attempt to try to understand. So, basically what you are doing right now. ·snunɐw·
0
0
0
0
0
0
2480a67c648f2266
YOU SUCK!! Deadly ASSASSIN IS GAY
1
1
1
0
0
0
24861f38bdfa39ea
Well, I'll concede that it depicts the organ used in breastfeeding, as does every other picture in the article; in other words, it's redundant in that regard. ∇∆∇∆
0
0
0
0
0
0
248a79c2131b27eb
Bite me, you partisan hypocrite.
1
0
0
0
0
0
248f3e4a573b7bb6
" Per WP:NLIST: ""Furthermore, every entry in any such list requires a reliable source attesting to the fact that the named person is a member of the listed group."" WP:BURDEN say when you add the info, you provide the source. The Dissident Aggressor "
0
0
0
0
0
0
2490c80dd595a3f6
" Well, thank you. We certainly agree on fundamental difficulty in communicating. I am able to hear what you have to say. I don't perceive you as a Great Evil in your idiom, or ill-intended (except perhaps on one point I'll go into later), and I can generally extend good faith when one is open to public discussion. Given the many confusions involved, I first need to know: 1. Are you now willing, as I am, to discuss the primary issues in detail in a consensus-building discussion subject to such WP:BRD principles as ""listen very carefully"" and ""be ready to compromise""? If so, the first consensus I need is whether an article should exist on the topic of dramatically-concentrated short-period political fundraising. Your objections at AFD appear to me primarily as ""magnet for edit-warring"" and ""WP:COATRACK"" (you raise other concerns related to neologism, but they do not enter into the question as I've phrased it). These concerns both seem bad arguments per WP:RUBBISH because they are surmountable problems, and Wikipedians may not delete based on creator intent but on criteria like notability: we are expected to resolve edit wars and coatracks by DR, not deletion. 2. Given this, for what reasons if any would you oppose existence of an article on the topic of dramatically-concentrated short-period political fundraising? (If none, I would ask you to change your AFD entry at this point in good faith.) The second consensus I need is how to disambiguate the search string ""moneybomb"". Previously you advocated google bomb as the primary redirect. Independent of the previous paragraph, I would ask: 3. What is your specific justification that users entering the string ""moneybomb"" would be interested primarily in a detailed description of search manipulation, with a mention of the fundraising form without further fundraising elaboration? (If none, please propose alternate disambiguation specifics.) This proposition, which your position amounts to, would imply there is greater connection of the string ""moneybomb"" with search manipulation than with fundraising, which is an exceptional claim to me, requiring detailed explanation. I'm sure you recognize that both reliable sources on this point use the string ""money bombing"" and significantly not ""moneybomb"". This must suffice to begin. Please reply to these details first before we build to other matters such as policies. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
2495f9809f4f377c
Bribery in Mexico Pfizer has serious accusations alongside drug wholesaler Farmacos Especializados SA de CV of illegal payments to Mexicans Authorities, in order to secure the inclusion of its portfolio within government health care institutions (ISSSTE). There are plenty of reported irregularities, specially in the Mexican Social Security, where the company sells plenty of more expensive cholesterol lowering product (Lipitor) over cheaper generic versions of generic drugs (Simvastatin and Pravastatin). Oftentimes ISSSTE favor’s Pfizer with huge purchases and failing to maximize budget to purchase more critical drugs, thus compromising the healthcare coverage of Mexican Citizens.
0
0
0
0
0
0
24973be1304921bb
QuackGuru, we are already over that pseudohistorical revisionism. You know it better than I do.
0
0
0
0
0
0
249de08c93c9c442
" Cause of death of Allan Bloom Dear Threebythree: at your invitation I have responded to your edit to the Bloom article on that talk page. Looking at the list of your many and valuable Wiki-contributions I see a pattern in what seems to interest you: Glen Beck, ""Restore Honor Rally,"" Fox News, Bill O' Reilly, Tea Party, and so forth. I take it that if you were to call yourself something, you would not call yourself a liberal? I wonder, if it is not too intrusive to ask, would you more likely describe yourself as a mainstream Republican, or as a Tea Partier? I'll watch this page, and the Bloom discussion page, and look forward to your response. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
24a06f493ddf9176
" MO is a valid RS for the original stories, of course, and for such things as corrections etc. as neither is ""self-serving"" in this matter, which would be the main reason not to use it as a source about itself. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
24a1fe2f4178fdb6
Actually, there seem to be quite a few, if contributions to local articles are any indication.
0
0
0
0
0
0
24a49107445bf837
REDIRECT Talk:Trofeo Cidade de Vigo
0
0
0
0
0
0
24a60b933ed5169a
" Londonderry Hi, Are you some one-issue POV-pushing nut? Because WP is full of jerks like that. It was Londonderry in news reports during the Troubles. Londonderry, Londonderry, Londonderry. You used to hear it all the bloody time. Ireland, Vietnam. Vietnam, Ireland. The 1960s, remember? Then very occasionally in the 1970s, you would hear ""Derry"" and you would be left wondering, ""Is this Derry place anywhere close to the famous Londonderry?"" In 1977, you don't just go on the web and look it up and discover these are synonyms. Right? And Balbo's visit to Londonderry did not occur in 1977, now did it? Happy now? Please don't put silly anachronisms into a serious article. (Canada)"
0
0
0
0
0
0
24a7b320c666a9da
hi HEY !!!!!!!!!!!!4.245.72.213
0
0
0
0
0
0
24aa0ad084103741
She wasn't asked to stand by Ibobi Singh his offer was more vague. As Ibobi Singh sells the ticket it doesn't make sense he'd lose out money wise by offering a safe seat to Sharmila. But this is wiki.
0
0
0
0
0
0
24afda3b7f73f295
Illegal NPOV behavior by Rich Farmbrough (SmackBot) Rich Farmbrough acting as SmackBot has disputed th neutrality of the article but has not provided an explanation as required by the rules []. As a result the initiation of this NPOV has been commenced on an illegal footing. 1:15, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
0
0
0
0
0
0
24b2a8591616ba41
, 25 September 2010 (UTC) It's time someone put that O Fenian and his entourage back into their box...for good! PS. Have to go now before the block brigade go to arms! lol87.114.30.31 10:53
0
0
0
0
0
0
24bebb55d25f015d
" British vs. American english Should the article read so that there are no Brit.-Amer. ambiguities? There are several words used that are not in common usage in the United States. Even though this horrendous crime took place in the U.K., a ""Yank"" reading it has to do a bit of research to understand a few of the meanings. Maybe this is a good thing, i.e., a bit of learning. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
24ca5d57d6c264dd
" Changing ""programme"" to ""program"" is a minor point and in line with current Australian usage, as listed in the Commonwealth's Style Manual and the Macquarie Dictionary. Please, can we treat this as something requiring a discussion on consensus, rather than escalating it? "
0
0
0
0
0
0
24cb0bed24313bce
know of one or two horse farms on OSR, I don't know of an xmas tree farm and I
0
0
0
0
0
0
24cbeb7378e559c7
Hi I mailed some company which sells Sailor stars with subtitles. They said they are from some small studion with their own copyrights for season 5. And the box set has 12 DVDs!?! Actually I don't believe it but I'm gonna ask more. But does anyone knows if this could be the truth, about that copyright stuff?
0
0
0
0
0
0
24d08bd9a9220e1f
" Hello, Rania553! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! (talk • contribs) |}"
0
0
0
0
0
0
24d20f62f43d774c
If you cannot see the long-range order in that micrograph, then your sense of order is clearly much different than that of a typical trained materials scientist.
0
0
0
0
0
0
24d675880cc2e34d
Huddersfield Article Hi Meegs! Just seeking your opinion on something! This article page St George's Quarter scheme has been created as a spin off from the Huddersfield page by new well meaning editors. Do you think this, currently 1 line, article merits a seperate article page? I'm also a bit concerned that the two new editors are uploading copyright images from other websites. I've put a query up on the wiki help desk about them but would like a second opinion.
0
0
0
0
0
0
24dae8cc5bfc14bf
Words to Avoid - terrorist (again) Have another look at WP:Words to avoid - terrorist, the description of terrorist should not be used, however factually stating they are considered a terrorist group by specified countries is acceptable.
0
0
0
0
0
0
24dd6fc63266e4af
LUCKY is the best YOU ADDED MORE TO RANDALL WEEMS!
0
0
0
0
0
0
24df45fff23c8291
" Be a good editor. Don't get on admin's bad sides. Don't get blocked again. That's what I'm doing, and itseems to be working out for me. contact meMy work "
0
0
0
0
0
0
24df49598486ed34
Happy new year I just wanted to say, no hard feelings, you are a really good wikipedian TomStar81 and I like your attitude and the way that you get around problem issues like spelling by sheer tenacity, good research and being nice to people here. If you ever need anyone to check your spelling in 2008, then count me in, and good luck mate!
0
0
0
0
0
0
24e49a492f3d7d32
correctionperson: I corrected it not vandalized it Blood Libel accusations are accusations that Jews have committed blood libel not the false accusations whether such accusations are true or false is another question entirely but the blood libel accusations are accusations not inherently false accusations that makes no sense and looks stupid
1
0
0
0
0
0
24e695415a71ef75
" EDIT: Sarek also recently closed an MfD (of Seregain's userpage which contained a list of my edit history) because he believed it was in ""bad faith"", however I created this MfD at the request of a third party who had intervened and advised me to do so. Therefore I'd say that Sarek jumped the gun here not needs to show a little more ""good faith"" himself."
0
0
0
0
0
0
24ea1277890b82c3
" op-eds are worthless sources when they don't work for chrisO's narrative; must-reads which establish the fact of the matter when they do work for chrisO's narrative. court-appointed forensic ballistics experts are ""fringe kooks"" also. side note, i actually added text which stated discretly that the libel conviction had been overturned by a higher court, but that was rv'd. the operative definition here for npov violation, after all is ""not chrisO's pov."" "
0
0
0
0
0
0
24ef8201e0679f01
|action3=GAN |action3date=12 January 2012 |action3result=passed |action3link=Talk:Star Trek (film)/Archive 3#GA |action3oldid=105628675 | currentstatus = GA
0
0
0
0
0
0
24f1433295ddaead
As I explained above, your hypothesis that improvement in the unemployment rate is primarily due to people dropping out of the labor force is incorrect, as the civilian labor force has increased.
0
0
0
0
0
0
24f7bb0d43f1ac29
Tickle my ass with a feather! Yes, yes, yes! Oh, you're driving me crazy!!!!
1
0
1
0
0
0
24f8b181144774d0
" Use in the past. The article says ""Other countries that were neither British nor Islamic that have used JCP in the more distant past include China, Germany, Korea, Sweden and Vietnam."" I'm sure there is no country (or better to say - territory), that has not used it in the past. Especially, distant past. So is there a need in the singling out of the above states? "
0
0
0
0
0
0
25008aefd20ac6c0
, which is obviously my fault
0
0
0
0
0
0
250865e9bc7c2b45
" (un-indent) You could probably strike that too. Though I kinda like the idea of ejecting someone from the planet, it was made when I was upset and really wanted him ejected from the planet. - • Talk • "
0
0
0
0
0
0
250c6edbeb53b795
" figure out the MAIN profile that created ""omnicron5"" and delete everything about him. I was once the webmaster for theofficial sites of both of these celebs, and it's theONLY ""edits"" he made... deleting the external links. don't have time for these assholes. I would prefer my clients not be associated with wiki, but they are here, therefore, the official links stay, and the trolls go. Or I will just take legal action. You choose. No, I will not ID myself, and I have plenty of systems to login from. So, just do it. My message to the troll.... TO: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Omicron8 well, the proof is in your psychotic editing routine. get a fucking life already. Jesus Christ, how sad you must be to exist. How interesting that the ONLY ""contribution"" you gave is to: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kathy_Najimy&diff;=147810076&oldid;=147709505 and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sam_Harris_%28singer%29 and the only thing you do is remove the links to the official web sites and ironically, both web sites had the same webmaster at some point. hmmmm using this omnitroll name (like I don't know who you are retard?!) you can stop vandalizing those two pages now you fucking pathetic moron. cc: Jimbo Wales rootmyass"
1
0
1
0
1
0
25117d5ddc8fcd47
" You want to use the function.— ChatOffline "
0
0
0
0
0
0
2513396e98befff3
LAWL lulz @ u nerd, keep deleting my comments.
0
0
0
0
0
0
2521297ccd96f60c
" Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. : contact : "
0
0
0
0
0
0
2524356787c340de
a generalisation about American idocy is not a personal attack on any user it is a generalisation of an entire nation of idiors.... and please stop violating WP:PRESERVE WP:VANDALISM WP:NOTCENSORED and 3RR 82.41.107.97
0
0
0
0
0
0
2524adba766c5351
" Growing back to its old self, forewarned: The article is being expanded again. While I'm all right with this, I predict it won't be long before fans start inserting padding and cruft in here again; some have tried to move it back completely to the way it was before all that junkalunk was removed. Before it needs to be reduced to a stub again, I think we should work primarily on getting external information on Kenny, in other words, expanding his ""Other media"" section and basically ignoring the rest of the sections. Anyone like? "
0
0
0
0
0
0
252594eb5f69a5c1
" Potsdam Declaration Here some quotation from the ""Official Gazette of the control council for Germany"" (Documents relating to the establishment of the Allied Control Authority) - published by the ""Allied Secretariat"" in Berlin, Elssholzstrase 32. Under item VI (Statement by the Governments of the United Kingdom, the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republic and the Provisional Government of the French Republic on the zones of occupation in Germany) they write: ""1. Germany, within her frontiers as they were on 31st December, 1937, will, for purposes of occupation, be divided into four zones, one to be alloted to each Power as follows ..."" Under item VIII (Report on the Tripartite Conference of Berlin) and there Article IX concerning the western frontier of Poland they write: ""The three Heads of Government reaffirm their opinion that the final delimitation of the western frontier of Poland should await the peace settlement."" Until this peace conference the disputed territories ""shall be under the administration of the Polish State and for such purposes should not be considered as part of the Soviet Zone of occupation in Germany."" So keeping in mind this facts sincerely it´s obvious that the (West-) Allies didn´t order any transfer of Germans out of their ancestral homelands because by doing this they would have created a fait accompli. Actually Russia and Poland created such accomplished facts by expelling most of that Germans - even quite long before the Potsdam Declaration. (Comment: Any forced transfer of population is a crime against humanity; and this it was already at times of 1945 - Nazi-Germany was trialed exactly for such crimes, too.) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
2528477aa3272361
"==Blanking of Hovercraft== Hi. It may not have been your intention, bu tyou accidently blanked part of the above article. I have undone this edit. Thanks ! |  Chat  "
0
0
0
0
0
0
252e302385f23869
" PLEASE READ BEFORE ADDING ANY MORE RUBBISH As far as I can see Wikipedia has become a very turgid shadow of what I originally signed up to - and I really can't see any point editing it any more. Having followed the climate articles for many years and now having a great deal of expertise, I can no longer just sit back and hope that Wikipedia will some day come around to a NPOV. There are certain simple things that are so obviously POV pushing that it beggars belief that they still go on: Not using common names when they are used by everyone else Not admitting simple facts like it is not currently warming. Pretending ""global warming"" is a ""scientific"" issue when everyone knows it is mainly political rhetoric even when practised by the ""scientists"". And don't you dare think I'm pushing POV - I have not once added anything to a climate article without first seeking consensus (which basically means I have never edited a climate article)!!!! I KNOW WHAT IS A NPOV ... BECAUSE I HAVEN'T FUNDAMENTALLY CHANGED FROM WHEN I USED TO BE A GLOBAL WARMING ADVOCATE AND NEITHER HAVE MY VIEWS ON THE ENVIRONMENT CHANGED ... I JUST CAN'T STAND PEOPLE BEING DISHONEST, AND I JUST THINK SCIENTIFIC INTEGRITY IS MORE IMPORTANT THAT ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS From the day I first tried to get a NPOV on the climate articles (when I used to work in wind and was openly saying global warming is happening) till today, I haven't once managed to get a substantial change toward NPOV into a climate article. '''I'm angry ... not because I f*cking wanted to put the sceptical view ... it is because you bunch of pr***s have turned me into a sceptic because you refuse to see the obvious POV pushing that has been going on. And the great consolation, is that the climate articles have been so POV that most decent people can spot it a mile off and what with climategate, the propaganda in Wikipedia is no longer considered a reliable source. "
0
0
1
0
1
0
2531ab11be2201cb
block what did i do then, i only added info not removed and disruptive edditing
0
0
0
0
0
0
25323ef2ad135731
Willing to help out Cerejota, I am a great admirer of Tony the Marine's contributions to Wikipedia, and I would like to help with any articles dealing with Puerto Rico. Please let me know if I can be of any help.
0
0
0
0
0
0
2535669e09126cb6
Vulture image Hi, you're shown as author of the picture at File:Vulture11.jpg. Have you got it in higher res? I'd like to set it up as background image. Thanks!
0
0
0
0
0
0
25365fedf64ff819
Thanks for the information.
0
0
0
0
0
0
25382b39dd31b835
" I disagree with some of Bladesmulti's reply but agree that we should keep the sentence. Having some strong interest and affection for scripture and for scientific knowledge, I can't think of a single fact or method within science that has been borrowed from scripture. However, scientific developments for many hundreds of years were achieved by societies and mindsets that understood them within the religious intellectual framework of the period. That's not just a ""point"" for religious people, it's a historical fact that we want to accurately describe. - "
0
0
0
0
0
0
253e5affb3ad2558
" ""rmv crap"" You could stand to be more informative and less hostile in your edit comments. The comment ""rmv crap"" implied to me that you were removing vandalism, not a good-faith edit to the article (the ""spoiler"" warning added by ''' "
1
0
0
0
0
0
2540a83a1a56ab37
U have nothing better 2 do than hate? That saddens me. Im surrounded by love Im sorry 4 whatever happened 2 make u so bitter.
0
0
0
0
0
0
2541b2208e13b4da
Replying to Above. Simply put...Anus
1
0
1
0
0
0
254c7c8e048c8633
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk • contribs). No, discussion boards aren't reliable. It would need to be, say, an article in Billboard about her declining popularity. —'''''' (talk)
0
0
0
0
0
0
2550b6fe12a783bb
" ""Okey what? "": Don't upload any more photos, and especially don't add them to articles, until you thoroughly read and understand WP:NFC and WP:IMAGE. You have added images that are either copyrighted or have no copyright information on the image page. Either of those is a violation of Wikipedia policy. "
0
0
0
0
0
0