Datasets:
tasksource
/
jigsaw_toxicity

Dataset card Data Studio Files Community
1
id
stringlengths
16
16
comment_text
stringlengths
6
5k
toxic
int64
0
1
severe_toxic
int64
0
1
obscene
int64
0
1
threat
int64
0
1
insult
int64
0
1
identity_hate
int64
0
1
2a2497ba56b24b4e
Problems I took some stuff out . he wasn't a lead author for IPCC '90. That appears to be a mangled version of He was the principal author of the Resource Use and Management Subgroup report in the IPCC’s First Assessment. Quite what that is I don't know, but its different. the other stuff was a copyvio from the same source. Also, I'm not convinced that http://www.world-economics-journal.com/Contents/AuthorDetails.aspx?AID=418 is a RS for a biog; it looks very much like author-supplied material
0
0
0
0
0
0
2a288e66123d709d
" September 2012 (UTC) You are presupposing that Asparagaceae (or perhaps ""Asparagaceae"") is defined under the ICN. The code, however, claims merely to regulate nomenclature, providing definitions only of words like ""cultivar"" (in Appendix VII), words that do not name taxa. Even if you can produce a reliable source for your claim that names are defined in terms of a type and a rank (a claim that is also made in the lead), you have a problem with neutrality; Monsch (2003), for example, argues that names do not have definitions. The ICN entries, on this view, only fix the reference of names, while a definition—if one were possible—would provide the meaning. The meaning/reference distinction is much discussed in recent philosophy. 16:23, 24"
0
0
0
0
0
0
2a295e87727c07ec
No, you have proven to be. You never failed to strike me with arguments that would make a mongoloid faint. I'll go with uncivil and gloating because you deserve it. But you, however, refuse to acknowledge even your slightest faults, and that is pathetic and untrustworthy if anything. I'm done with you and I hope I won't meet such incompetence here again.
1
0
0
0
0
0
2a2bf80cf4af4bd2
" Posting Spoilers I hearby request that all spoilers be refrained from being posted in plain sight on the official Wikipedia page. Users should be forced to click a 'Show' button in order to see spoilers. I visited this page to see the background information for each houseguest, and lo and behold, Dick's exit from the house was spoiled for me. Really unfair to someone who only watches the shows, and I believe my request is more than fair. Moved this down, now regarding spoilers according to WP:SPOILER they are allowed and just because they may ""spoil"" a viewers experience well there is nothing Wikipedia can do. Each year this comes up but policies are policies. This comes up with every English BB but is most notable with the American version due to the fewer broadcasts per week. As long as the information is sourced then it can be permitted. And with the American version an editor is allowed to cite the live Internet feeds and Big Brother: After Dark to keep the information in the article. This was discussed in BB11 with the introduction of the flashback/replay feature on the American feeds. ucard 16♫♪ "
0
0
0
0
0
0
2a335911b797bb4c
While this isn't exactly the place to discuss theories and such, there are actually a couple flaws in your argument. The first one being that Totosai doesn't like Sesshomaru and therefore refuses to make any sword for him period. The second flaw in your argument is that while Sesshomaru could have a sword made from one of his fangs, it still wouldn't be as powerful as one made from the fangs of his father, as he was much more powerful than Sesshomaru as a demon.
0
0
0
0
0
0
2a33599d392b85f8
Re: Image:Katse dam intake tower.jpg I've uploaded the image to the Wikicommons here. Enjoy.
0
0
0
0
0
0
2a423fb8c08ef40b
". Also, I am well aware that SPAM ""covers"" the spamming; that's why I complained about it. Does it ""cover"" it in any useful actionable sense, no it does not. But, I'll be glad to alert you in the future if you're inclined to block something that actually matters"
0
0
0
0
0
0
2a48bfa93ac6bc1f
You reverted 20 minutes of good faith editing for no good reason. You didn't read the talk page. You scolded me, for something you did. Why?
0
0
0
0
0
0
2a4a8df43dcd6ff3
Now try a station with the new style Annual Usage (i.e. Stobcross or Langside and Newlands.
0
0
0
0
0
0
2a4a8e6efa55ba18
many more Gay Types there are many more types of Gay as Gay bear,chubby bear,stocky bear,chubby gays. more c www.bearwww.com www.bear411.com www.biggggercity.com\chat
0
0
0
0
0
1
2a4de030707f227a
" Thank you. I know some ""plat duuts"" (Frisian for PlattDeutsch) myself so maybe I'll go to that wikipedia. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
2a4f12b40d022853
" April 2007 (UTC) I agree with Anjouli's paragraph as a bookend to the above discussion, but I don't think it's quite self-explanatory enough to give guidance to future editors. How about these four points? I'd like to refine them and propose them as refinements to WP:BIO. Everyone: Please comment below each bullet point. | Talk Follow WP policy on Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Lists of people. This says that ""the list should be limited to notable people: those that already have a Wikipedia article or could plausibly have one, per this guideline."" Entries that are clearly non-notable or spurious should be deleted. | Talk Where a person on the Notable Former Students list does not have an article already (i.e. has a red link), check to see if the person used to have an article, which was deleted because they weren't notable. In that case, delete the person from the notables list. Otherwise, they may stay on the list but, in the spirit of the WP policy on attribution to reliable sources, there should be a footnote attached to their name with a citation showing their local connection. If there's no footnote, it's appropriate to put on a ""fact"" tag saying a citation is needed. | Talk Where a person on the Notable Former Students list does have an article, but the article does not mention the local connection, then the editor adding the notable citizen to the list should add a statement to the person's article, documenting their local connection, with attribution to a reliable source. If there's no such statement in the person's article, it's appropriate to put a ""fact"" tag on the person's entry in the list to show the article is missing evidence for a school connection, and perhaps the person doesn't belong on the list. If it seems likely that there is no school connection, delete the name from the list. | Talk Where a person on the Notable Former Students list has an article, and the article mentions a local connection, but there's no attribution to a reliable source, then it's appropriate to put a ""fact"" tag against that unsupported mention of a local connection. In this case there's no tag on the name in the list. | Talk 06:30, 13"
0
0
0
0
0
0
2a58e7c85f580b2b
No, it is not ready for a peer review. Look at Pinafore and go section by section. Are all the sections there and filled out? Plus, it looks like you are ignoring the conversation that we just had with Wehwalt. He plans to work on it. Sam
0
0
0
0
0
0
2a5ba48072755b23
" Only if you can find citation that says so. Otherwise it's unverifiable speculation. After all, just because everyone in the country whose surname isn't ""Beckham"" (rightly) thinks Stevie G should be captain, it doesn't mean he's necessarily in with a shout ;-) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
2a5bd9e413c8b798
" TMI / Randall Thompson Hm, are you saying that your claims regarding his claims are more reputable due to your mentioning of him mentioning conspiracy? I'd challenge your sanity if that would be the case, of course hoping it is not. Many real stories sound unbelievable, and lots of crap is thoroughly ""sourced"" to fool people. It takes close attention to even small discrepancies to tell reality apart from crap at times. Good luck. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
2a5dc7169b353799
" Editor hrafn and the campaign to efface pages on sprituality and New Thought I just found this page by taking a tour of pages that editor hrafn has recently started editing. Hrafn appears to be a single-purpose editor who removes material from pages that present biographies of, and books by, Christians and New Thought writers. Examples of inexperienced editors seeking help from a more exerienced editor when entire pages were found to be deleted (without prior discussion) or redirected (with loss of data) or merged (with loss of data) by hrafn are here, here, here, here, and here. See also the edit history of Wallace Wattles and Charles F. Haanel and their related discussion pages. Hrafn claims to merely be ""enforcing verifiability"" of biography pages, but the only pages he targets are those related to Christianity and New Thought. He summarily deletes material without discussion. He cuts biography lengths by 50% to 75% and then nominates the articles for deletion based on the ""non-notability"" of the bio subject. He has on one occasion deleted an entire page without discussion. It is very likely that, as evidence of his campaign of effacement and deletion is accumulated and follows him, he will either stop engaging in this practice or be proposed for blockage from editing spirituality and/or religion articles. If you know of other instances of his deletions and effacements, please list them. Thank you for your attention. catherine yronwode a.k.a. ""64"" 64.142.90.33 "
0
0
0
0
0
0
2a60ea10f382b9d5
|listas = Apple (album)
0
0
0
0
0
0
2a65f1d899b7226f
" Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 MacRobertson Miller Airlines Flight 1750 On 27 July you deleted some information from the See also section - see your diff. I have reverted your deletion for the following reason: The Manual of Style/Layout gives relevant advice at WP:SEEALSO. It states “Editors should provide a brief annotation when a link's relevance is not immediately apparent, when the meaning of the term may not be generally known, or when the term is ambiguous. For example: •TABRelated person — made a similar achievement on April 4, 2005 •TABIschemia — restriction in blood supply"" Regards. (t) Article for deletion Hi William. Please take a look at this. Thanks!'''''' Talk Palair Macedonian Airlines Flight 301 Good article, have added the photo and changed the infobox. The latest infobox can be found at [[Template:Infobox aircraft occurrence}}. When you've creates an article it is usual to open the talk page with a project banner;in this case {{WPAVIATION|class=start | b1 = | b2 = | b3 = | b4 = | b5 =y|Accident=y}} The B-clas checklist doesn't have to be filled out as it is frowned upon to self assess higher than start class, but it is good manners to include it so the assessor can get on with the job. Happy editting/article writing . Should Joseph Baldwin Academy be nominated for AfD? Hi William. Can you look at Joseph Baldwin Academy and see if you think it should be nominated for AfD? I can't establish any notability at all; no qualifying coverage at all. The article is about a summer program for kids that takes place at Truman State University. The whole thing simply looks like an advertisement or brochure for the program and all the sourcing is to the program's own website pages. The article even has the program's Summer 2012 schedule. Also, if you look at the talk page, the article has been written solely by their students as a project. If you think it should be nominated, can you start the AfD? I don't know how to do it. Thanks! 76.189.114.163 This is not the type of article I know the WP criteria for. Yes I do alot of AFDs, but most are either Aviation or Sports related. All other AFDs I've done that don't fit those two I doubt number more than 10 or 12. Sorry I can't help. Kudos Kudos for withdrawing the bad nomination on the Maine politician when you realized you had made a mistake. Things would run more smoothly at WP if we all could admit our inevitable minor goofs as they happen. Disambiguation link notification for August 26 Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maulty Moore, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Milligan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of ""Did you mean..."" article titles. Read the Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these . Thanks, == UAL Flight 5
0
0
0
0
0
0
2a6840d4e300e06f
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
0
0
0
0
0
0
2a6e35dcf2ff2f4c
Um I wasn't in the You Can't Do That On Television article today. I was in the Amyas Godfrey article earlier today but that's only because I wanted to verify how I did something. If for some reason that went up I might have hit the save button in error, possibly out of force of habit. On another note can you please refrain from being rude and demeaning. First the Amyas Godfrey article I wrote is neutral (if that is what we are talking about), second I'm not in this to create a fan site. With respect you do need to talk and communicate with others in a more respectful tone, before you piss off the wrong person. Maybe if you done so to begin with instead of behaving like the Wiki-police, and offer proper advice on how to make articles to the standard, we wouldn't be in at each other's throats.
0
0
0
0
0
0
2a74f89cfe0558ba
The Jefferson School The article deleted because it was copied from another website. This is copyright violation and against the law. `'Míkka
0
0
0
0
0
0
2a757f856962ed30
Agreed, I have added a comment on the talk page. Let's gather all the parties including the governmental representatives etc. Now there are no arguments for not using Kyiv as the name. ( )
0
0
0
0
0
0
2a7700e7cee7d243
{{unblock|reason=I have already submitted an unblock request but no has answered. I have my reason to be unblocked above the first review request. I did what User:Swarm told me to do, so I think I am ready to start over.
0
0
0
0
0
0
2a7707a0ac06ce5b
to the dumpster where i live because i am a poor butthole surfer
1
0
1
0
0
0
2a78389e8739f2cd
":::::::::::::I agree that his ""evident ability' refers to his words and deeds. What else can it refer to? And do not I use the same wording as Kershaw does? So how can I be denoucing what he says by sayig what he says? That makes no sense. And does not this ""evident ability"" to portray himself as a defender of Christianity against the communists, appealing to Chuch going Christians (what Kershaw accurately says), immediately follow with ""FOR EXAMPLE,"" and then one of Hitlers Christian statements to that effect? So how can you say that I have disconnected his statment from his actual words? I have not. ""For example"" directly connects it. What I have done is report what Kershaw actually says, while you want to restrict what he says to suite your own pov. My tweak is faithful to the actual wording of the source, while yours is restricted so as to make the original point unclear and allow it to possibly say something it does not. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
2a7d1acd95689dda
Hi! Jetblue is not a buy on board airline. http://www.jetblue.com/about/whyyoulllike/about_whysnacks.html - Only alcohol is for charge.
0
0
0
0
0
0
2a81d211623cc70d
" first blush I noticed post, and wondered if perhaps you weren't being a bit defensive. I didn't see it as ""posturing"" by Mastcell, but rather a considered action followed by a detailed reasoning as to why he did what he did. That's not to say that I'm familiar with the situation, I'm not. Just that having seen and known Mastcell for a long time, I have to say that I've never known him to point fingers, make accusations, or step on toes. I /do/ understand that when you take an administrative action which gets changed that you start to question yourself and all (big time .. but I won't go into my own details), but I doubt any slight was intended in the least. You're doing some damn fine work Dennis - don't let the little stuff throw ya for a loop. Cheers. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
2a8cf3def7188fa3
, 27 July 2014 (UTC) I made my proposed change. I was wrong here and in my summary when I stated that the lead include separatist denials of responsibility. It does not. - 04:42
0
0
0
0
0
0
2a8da83ff1f9a1f1
Given how relentlessly anti-egalitarian British society remains, I don't see that an entry in the DNB or ODNB, in itself, means all that much. I'd certainly hope that Wikipedia policy isn't that inclusion in either of those automatically equates to notability.
0
0
0
0
0
0
2a90065a7306bf65
Billy Bradshaw (footballer) Further to my reply to your query raised at [Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football]], I have expanded the article on William Bradshaw (footballer) to incorporate all that I can find on Joyce. I would like to create an article on Billy Bradshaw (footballer), but don't have time to do it justice as I am going away tonight for ten days. If you are planning on creating an article, his brief details (per Joyce) are: Born Padiham, April 1884; played for Padiham and Accrington Stanley, then joined Blackburn Rovers (1903-1919): 386 league apps, (36 goals). Joined Rochdale in 1923 as player-manager. Cheers.
0
0
0
0
0
0
2a94fa49969f26fb
By the official policys, the fact myself and WesleyDodds have more sources by a significant amount, outweighs your one. And admin has set a proposal, i suggest you take it, in the art of compromise.
0
0
0
0
0
0
2a991bda8c82d181
" No it is not a trick. Why don';t you email this person which you can do privately and show him how many times I have blogged? I dare you. You won't because you can't. You are lying. My name was posted as a guest editor on a website that you don't like - and I have not ""blogged"" there. I posted maybe once or twice, and have not been back since. I did not even know my and my husband's name were there as guest editors until YOU LINKED TO IT HERE ON WIKIPEDIA> And would you, Random, please explain to me why I have to justify my reason for not wanting my real name linked to on Wikipedia? Can you show me the policy where it is acceptable to demand a showing of how it can harm me? As it turns out, there is valid reason. But I should not have to defend myself on my reasons. At all. IT is outrageous that you or anyoen even asked. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
2a9ca1f93e836ad1
You're right. I've redirected The Sun back to The Sun (newspaper), and put a small notice on the top of the latter article. It's a big page move and there doesnt appear to be any concensus for it.
0
0
0
0
0
0
2aa371d63d5f4c3e
" I changed ""he was probably Persian"" to ""most sources identify him as being Persian"" - both still do not state ""he was Persian"", which would be POV. Cheers, "
0
0
0
0
0
0
2aacd560b88a4f45
What use is compensation to a dead man? 86.176.110.26
0
0
0
0
0
0
2ab2bf3161e50d7b
" I think at the time I was a little annoyed by people trying to change this article and all references into what is basically fannon names. The Article is either about ""Godzilla (US)"" or ""Zilla"". Quite frankly, i'm not a Godzilla fan, so I don't really care either way, or what people want to call it. Providing it's not GINO. Gino isn't offical one way or the other. I'm just going with what's sourced. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
2aba483b5b74c8ba
in its current status (last edit by quadepus)
0
0
0
0
0
0
2abdd566fbe07f4b
Cry to your pathetic stupid family, you fucking bastard. I will do my utmost to have your account indefinitely banned you fucking fajita.
1
0
1
0
1
0
2ac2f2534e6f9204
spelling style no need to change from British to american spelling as per WP:style
0
0
0
0
0
0
2ac432a7f2f3fa48
Indefinite Full Protection please? Create indefinite full protection: Nakon, request staff that template/article is considered high-risk, make it full protection whatsoever, change from indefinite semi-protection to full-protection. 112.209.86.65
0
0
0
0
0
0
2ac4fafaff51a939
Edison's Personality and War of Currents I think the section on War of Currents should be broadened [] .
0
0
0
0
0
0
2ac5ab77c0493e88
Well, I tried to type it up into the page, as I did with the English one, but it doesn't work. I think you will have to reuppload it into Polish wikipedia (since I do not have an account there). Should not be a problem. Good luck.
0
0
0
0
0
0
2acbb4dd6187707c
Odin being able to take a soul away from Meohisto establsihes that although he may not be as powerful as Galactus persay he is still significantly more powerful than even Thanos or the Silver Surfer.
0
0
0
0
0
0
2ad544027863f041
What? What did I add to Wolfgang that you removed? Also, most of wikipedia is lacking citations, but the pages are still there...119.92.93.84
0
0
0
0
0
0
2ad54c4cfe62a6f0
Faculty of Law,University of Melbourne This article was copied directly from the law school history page. Copying material is plagiarism, and a violation of copyright laws. I've deleted the page; please note that if you continue to add copyrighted material, you may be blocked from editing.
0
0
0
0
0
0
2ae1df42b34155fa
CN tower fans are bitter
0
0
0
0
0
0
2ae2906e7efbbe57
I don't get what it means?????
0
0
0
0
0
0
2ae2dafc6cddc1cd
Keith Urban is not country and Tim & Faith McGraw are both not country as well they are both pop! - 11:23 am, 05 July 2006
0
0
0
0
0
0
2ae40203963fc5ec
The way this page is worded make's it sound like a high school book report, someone really needs to rewrite this.
0
0
0
0
0
0
2ae4cd05ee9758bb
Jean Lacouture thankfull for the corrections? After reading the the New York Review of Books article that this was taken from I think that someone admires Chomsky too much and is now using Chomskyesque techniques for sourcing. Please read the article by Lacouture and discuss. The impression I got from reading it is not what is presented in this article. 17:58, Feb 1, 2005 (UTC)
0
0
0
0
0
0
2ae6a67965110525
" Umm, the fiction section... in Neon Genesis, I believe that they're actually referring to the Pribnow Box itself, I don't think that it's ""a sort of jargon"" at all. I mean the context is that of an alien entity attempting to hack the HQ's control computer, and they discover that the hack is originating from the Prinbow Box. Isn't that pretty closely analagous to the action of RNA polymerase in a viral attack? Not to mention the entire film is an allegory, so I think that it's pretty likely that this was the auter's intention. Anyone have an objection to changing it? [05/04/2007]"
0
0
0
0
0
0
2ae82b990a7d96c0
Eh, I don't think Masked Rider Den-O is better than Kamen Rider Den-O. If we were to translate every japanese title to english, then some titles would be very awkward. Like say Utawarerumono, try translating that and making it sound good. Or even Yu-Gi-Oh, an anime that most people know of. You could translate that to Game King, but it doesn't really work that way. Also, all the previous Kamen Riders have been named Kamen Rider. Just my thoughts.
0
0
0
0
0
0
2ae8b0b5f22ec63c
Please summarize your edits.
0
0
0
0
0
0
2af194f59518e4cc
I'm talking about the anime group pic of A Few Dangerous Thugs from ep. 38, as soon as they're revealed at the beginning. And how was Mesopotamian Guy messed up? It's been a while since I saw the episode.
0
0
0
0
0
0
2af46434e476c683
Dead link I removed the link to http://www.rockbitch.co.uk because it looks to be dead.
0
0
0
0
0
0
2af7d3755db5eb4c
" 2007 (UTC) I don't know if I agree with Chicago to Macon. I've taken the greyhound from Milwaukee to Atlanta quite a few times and there is literally nothing between Chicagoland and Lousiville other than Indianapolis. 65 is by far the most boring stretch of interstate I've ever been on. You might be able to argue for Lousiville to Macon if you were willing to accept places like Murfresboro, Tennessee as a ""metro area."" I suppose you could include the Fox Valley since there's only a slight hiccup between Milwaukee and Oshkosh, and that'll definetly change if Interstate 41 happens. But then you risk changing the name of the region to ""A-Pit,"" and I think there are regions that deserve to be called an ""A-Pit"" much more than the Great Lakes (lol). 07:13, 12 April"
0
0
0
0
0
0
2afb6884c83b762f
" I agree that that is a discussion that should happen. I would argue that are still a band as they have never officially split up. That being said, how long does a band have to be ""inactive"" before the are a were? If you consider they haven't put any new music out in 15 years, does that count? That being said, even if we determine they ""are"" a band, Roger Waters and Richard Wright should not be listed as members. (In my opinion only, of course) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
2afd293ace050963
ever heard of a razer?
0
0
0
0
0
0
2b03bfc60a007291
" Not made in USA or UK That says it all! Not everybody lives or reads in one of the imperial powers. I write for those struggling with English in ""lesser"" countries. I am sorry I can no longer offer to stop writing articles and stop donating - I did that in response to a (prob male) bully who deleted an article of mine. Now a (prob female) bully comes out of the woodwork. I guess it gives a sense of power to otherwise impotent people. Time to change IP address ..."
0
0
0
0
0
0
2b040e7e0c8bdd1a
But according story of NFS carbon, you came to rockport from palmont after some bizarre police raid involving an EMP.
0
0
0
0
0
0
2b04c225f6de0bd4
Thank you! I thought nobody would notice the article, it doesn't seem to show up on Google for some reason. I'll put that second link in my links section.
0
0
0
0
0
0
2b07a34559bf6f46
fuck you99.99.167.130
1
0
1
0
0
0
2b08809760d3c8e1
" (I think). (Talk) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
2b08df28d03771af
One would say that wikipedia editors will be starving to get a new information. You starving to avoid and block to whom is providing any. Instead of to give a hand with it, you seeking reasons for not to provide it. How many reasons did you think off in the last 2 days, 4meter4?. That is how wikipedia works. I can see it. I was fairly drunk when writing that words above. It is actually not nice to call somebody like that is it? But now I can see the same, that you are wankers. FUCK YOU ;O) Block me for ever, i do not give shit
1
0
1
0
1
0
2b0abdb630076bec
" money in a parecon I find your rewrite of money in a parecon section awkwardley worded and clumbersome. also there are NO banks in a parecon. Please talk to me about these and other changes so we can get a change we both agree on. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
2b0e1096751ec1bd
" Find a new coder. If nothing else, that he'd screw his best friend, La_Pianista, out of a chance to be on the main page due to him being too much of a prick to care bout nything but intentionally hurting me has meant I can't work with him, and I hand FS over to him, which he'll probably run into the ground. I'm off. Don't expect me back. '''''' "
0
0
0
0
0
0
2b139fb7cba78b2e
MATE Mate, if i hear any more from you, I will show you something that you are not gna like. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED.
0
0
0
0
0
0
2b1bf652dc7744af
" Editor's Notice The above quoted information was obtained from the author personally through e-mail and appear in its original order. My nephew had a presentation on the book title ""Plague"" of David Orme, and found so little on Wikipedia about the author. As a result, I've contacted David Orme himself and he was very kind to send the detailed biography. In fact, he also gave me the permission to submit such detailed information for Wikipedia. He also is very fond of children and donated books to the library of Freedom International School, Bangalore in India on the requests of students Arun Kumar and Bharath Ajith. (the above text was originally in article space and moved here). "
0
0
0
0
0
0
2b1c57c5ad7cb9e5
Disagree that any of the guidelines appealed to above is a dead letter.
0
0
0
0
0
0
2b203476f1486b69
Fuck you asshole! Why did you undo my edit you son of a bitch?
1
0
1
0
1
0
2b2866688cae17a5
Third warning. STOP ADDING PIRATE WAREZ SITES TO WIKIPEDIA.
0
0
0
0
0
0
2b29b78c3e6e4435
Oh, I see you meant the CBS article. Yeah, it looks pretty suspicious. Although, to the topic in general, I would say, actually, that there may be some suspicious info around. However, a lot of it went poof with the deletion of pages like the minor character page.
0
0
0
0
0
0
2b2abfa22ba63b2f
":::Even during the 1891 census, castes like Vilakkithalavan and Veluthedan were counted separately. 90% of the Nairs counted in 1891 belonged to the Kshatriya divisions. The remaining 10% were caste groups wrongly claiming the Nair status. Moreover, the 1891 census in Kerala was conducted by Iyer Brahmins, who had a deep seated resentment towards Nairs (Iyers were treated much below Illathu Nair and Swaroopathil Nair in Travancore caste system and they were not allowed to perform priestly functions). Since all the original castes composing the Nair supergroup were Kshatriya and none of the historians considered the primary occupation of Nairs anything other than being soldiers, there is no reason to change the introductory phrase. As pointed out in the reference, the Nairs were commonly referred as Kshatriyas (whether it is accurate or not is another question) by historians. KN Panikker, probably the most famous historian from Kerala, calls them ""a Dravidian variety of the Aryan Kshatriyas"". Chintaman Vinayak Vaidya calls them ""Nagara Kshatriyas"" in his book Downfall of Hindu India. The question is not whether the much researched Nagvanshi origin is accurate or not. It is whether Nairs were known as Kshatriya during the last millenium. And the answer is yes, from multiple sources. However the caste system is the most complex in India, and this is the reason why Swami Vivekananda called Kerala a mental assylum. In Kerala, the son of a King can never be a Kshatriya, as according to Nambuthiri beliefs, a Kshatriya should have a Brahmin father and Kshatriya mother. This is the reason why the so called four ""Suryavanshi"" dynasties of Kerala always married off their females to Nambuthiris. These clans were known as Samanta Kshatriya and were regarded as equivalent to Kshatriya by the Nambuthiris. It should be noted that the Nambuthiris considered every other caste as Sudra, even the other Brahmin communities. The pollution time period (pula) gives an indication to this. Nambuthiris observed 10 days of pula (6 days in some places). The caste which is immediate next to them, the Samanta Kshatriyas observed 11 days of pula. Top most ranked Ambalavasi Brahmin communities like Elayathu and Moosad (unlike other Ambalavasi Brahmins like Maarar, these two castes were recognized by the Nambuthiris as a part of Brahmin community) observed 12 days of pula. This means that the position of Samanta Kshatriya was intermediate between Nambuthiri Brahmin and Ambalavasi Brahmin. The next higher ranking ones were some insignificant divisions of local Brahmins like Pushpaka Brahmins, who observed a pula ranging from 13 to 15 days. Higher ranking Chandravanshi and Nagvanshi Nair groups (all of the Samantans, most of the Kiryathils and most of Illathils) observed a pula of 15 days. Lower ranking Nairs (like Swaroopathil and Charna Nair) observed a pula of 16 days, so did Iyers and lower ranking Ambalavasis like Maarars in Trivandrum (In Palghat Iyers never observed any pula traditions and were independent on their own). Regarding the claim that people were granted the Nair title, I don't think a sufficiently large number of people belonging to other castes were granted the Nair title. A few occurrences are there in Travancore, where during the 18th century a very small number of Iyers were granted the Illath Nair status. During the 18th and 19th century a small number of Vellala and Maravar people were granted Nair status. Other than that there has been absolutely no ""conversion of caste"". The Portuguese record an incident, during 16th century when a Portuguese captain asked the Cochin King to elevate the status of some lower castes to Nair, the King told him that even the highest ranking Emperor does not have that power. During the end of 19th century, however as the Nair dominance was on a steep decline, a number of servant castes asked the Iyer census takers to count them as Nair, which they happily obeyed. And for a brief period, some of them even added ""Nair"" or ""Pillai"" to their surname, until the Kerala government nullified affirmative action benefits to all those who are having such a surname. These groups came not only from the Sudra division, but also from other divisions. These groups included Brahmins like Maarars, GSBs and Pisharodys (In Travancore, where Ambalavasis are having a lower status), Vaishyas like Chettys (in Travancore) and Arya Vaishyas (in Malabar) and even other Kshatriya communities like Marathas and Bunts. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
2b3398651c2fb2ff
" As Father C, my former parish priest would delightfully crow: ""Nobody is beyond redemption"" "
0
0
0
0
0
0
2b36789ef47d34dd
What I've seen happen before is that anonymous edits are treated like shit, regardless of what they are actually doing, and that anyone with a username is automatically assumed to be OK. You saw that I made edits that were reverted by someone with a username. Presumably you didn't bother to look into the merits of the edits, you just assumed that the username was right to revert them. And so you attacked me for being angry, not the username for reverting sensible edits. I think you should be able to see that it's unreasonable to expect good faith from me in return for that.
0
0
0
0
0
0
2b37f6e392577e29
" OK let's agree on one thing first: Including a link, not matter what the article is, requires substantial evidence in order to reason doing so. Having that in mind Planet Spore qualifies. BUT as we all agree (hopefully), WP is not a place to include every single website that may have info on a subject. (*)So we have to choose which are clearly ahead, in matter of info size, directory structure, further linking yada yada yada yada. For that matter WikiStylee you tried to justify the inclusion of gamingsteve.com and I agree, xspore.com where I also agree and sporewiki.com where I don't agree - not the inclusion but your justification. You asked for a logical fallacy and there you have it. You justify the inclusion of sporewiki.com in the Ext.Links because... it is already linked by WP. You have fallen into a logical loop there I'm afraid. To correct you to go * and see why sporewiki.com deserves an inclusion. I have 0 problems with Planet Spore being excluded but I have tons of problems with anyone who naively tries to belittle one's efforts as clutter and WP-relatedly with anyone who (unjustifiably then, hopefully not now) tried to scare away others who wished for the inclusion with the method of ""WHATEVER YOU DO IT WILL BE REVERTED"". I find THAT hideous and ugly because for the moment I care mostly for what WP provides, not GamingSteve.com or Planet Spore.com or whatever. So, that's all folks. Make up your mind and I will follow your lead in the greek equivalent in el:Spore (παιχνίδι). γράψε μου κάτι "
0
0
0
0
0
0
2b3b0f0cbbfc582c
I am annoyed that you reverted my tiffin school edit and by the way I hate you! A conversation leads to some political warning, you make me sick! ==================================NOTICE!================================== | NO RUDE COMMENTS | | NO IMAGE DELETION NOTICES | | NO UNSIGNED COMMENTS | | ~ | | THANKS! | ===========================================================================
1
0
0
0
1
0
2b40d3da12a48d29
"==Author's comments== I posted the following comments on the userpage, but moved them now to this talk page with minor edits: The following changes are suggested: Mark ""Requests for Adminship"" as historical, and open the new process, ""Sysop Applications."" Replace the standard three RFA questions with the six questions shown below. Question 3 - how the applicant intends to use the sysop tools - is similar to old question 1. Question 4, asking for the applicant's article writing experience, is based on old Question 2. I have removed old question 3 about conflicts with other users. Questions 1 and 2 are added to establish minimum criteria. Only one user (Lustiger.seth) who failed these criteria has become a sysop in the last several years. Having these criteria on the application should eliminate the need for WP:NOTNOW closes to premature RFAs. Questions 5 and 6 are added to establish the candidate's character for honesty. Why this wasn't done years ago after the Archtransit scandal is hard for me to understand. Disclosure of material negative information should be expected of all applicants. Remove the old system of voting ""support"", ""oppose"", or ""neutral"" with a reason in your vote. Instead, vote ""support"" or ""oppose"" without giving a reason. Then, if you choose to give a reason, you may comment in the ""Concerns"" section or on the talk page of the Application. This change will reduce the ""pile-on"" effect of oppose voting. Normally, in old RFAs, support voters vote without saying much, whereas oppose voters write long comments. The oppose votes are disorganized insofar as oppose vote number 13 may refer back to oppose votes number 2 and 6. The cumulative effect of oppose votes with long reasons is to say ""we hate you."" The new model removes this asymmetry. You can still oppose, but you can't say more in your oppose vote than a supporter would say in her support vote. The cumulative effect of bare support and oppose votes is ""some of us like you, and some don't."" To the extent that reasons for opposing the candidate need to be explained, the voter can explain in the ""Concerns"" section. No ""neutral"" votes. If you don't want to vote, nobody is forcing you. Neutral votes are pointless. We can decide later what a passing score should be. For now we can allow bureaucrats to use their discretion as they currently do. The following features will be maintained from the old RFA process: Bureaucrats decide the outcome after a 7-day discussion. A nominator may praise the candidate. That is probably the one positive aspect of old RFA that is worth preserving. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
2b42ee82229accfd
North American Tour Dates According to Gaga's site, there are 2 NEW tour dates.... 1/17/10 - Wallingford, CT (Oakdale Theater) and 1/18/10 Uncasville, CT (Mohegan Sun Arena)
0
0
0
0
0
0
2b45802a719865b0
wiki policy improvements Hey Seeker After being illegitimately blocked I realized that the best way to improve this place is to change the policies that are harming it. I've made some policy proposals for 3RR. I don't know if they would have helped in your case, but take a look and tell me what you think. They're at Wikipedia_talk:Three-revert_rule#Proposed_policy_changes
0
0
0
0
0
0
2b4c3760520773a8
Can you explain to me how I have not been following this policy?
0
0
0
0
0
0
2b4c4eace819c8ce
Dcokeman, while you preach to us from up high on what neutrality means, you need to take a lesson in civility. Stop throwing out lame definitions from webster's dictionary to prove your point, maybe assume we know a little bit about the english language. Stop preaching to us what neutrality means like a father talks to a child, just make your point about why something is neutral or not without defining neutrality for us everytime. Assume we're maybe quite possibly smarter than monkeys. Don't shout, there's no reason why you need to shove your opinion down our throats. 16:40, July 13, 2005 (UTC)
1
0
0
0
0
0
2b4c5c64958d6049
" If you don't know, don't comment. Talk "
0
0
0
0
0
0
2b53ae0846e41a20
Video game special edition triple crown Hi, just following up on a previous discussion about a special editiion triple crown for the WikiProject Video games. Since the last discussion, three more VG project members have earned triple crowns: , , and myself. DYK: Rufus (Street Fighter) GA: Reptile (Mortal Kombat) FC: Alleyway DYK: Grudge Warriors GA: Halo 3 FC: Golden Sun DYK: Close Combat: A Bridge Too Far GA: Age of Empires III FC: BioShock DYK: Conan (2007 video game) GA: Space Hulk (video game) FC: Giants: Citizen Kabuto DYK: Castlevania: Aria of Sorrow GA: Soma Cruz FC: Castlevania: Dawn of Sorrow DYK: Nintendo DSi GA: Guitar Hero III: Legends of Rock FC: Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare DYK: Neverwinter Nights 2: Mysteries of Westgate GA: Neverwinter Nights 2: Mysteries of Westgate FC: Planescape: Torment DYK: Mech Platoon GA: GT Advance Championship Racing FC: List of Kirby media DYK: List of Space Invaders video games GA: Robotron: 2084 FC: Space Invaders was awarded a regular triple crown for the below articles, but has significantly contributed in improving numerous video game articles to GA and FA. He pushed Characters of Final Fantasy VIII through GA and FA. Here are two example edit differences that show some of the his rewrites and sourcing; all the intermediate revisions between the differences are Deckiller's. Almost all the citations (more than 10) in this version were added by him. DYK: World of Final Fantasy VIII GA: Tom Brady FC: Battle of Dien Bien Phu Just out of curiosity, do you create the image used or is that something we're responsible for? The only reason I'm asking is because we have a number of editors that I'm sure would jump for the opportunity to create it, myself included. -p Let me know at your earliest convenience. Thank you. ( talk )
0
0
0
0
0
0
2b54d30e5a25e5d8
Fuckwad... you deleted my page.
1
0
1
0
1
0
2b565e951d6ff06b
"| style=""text-align: right; vertical-align: center"" | 468 x 60 | http://images.wikia.com/memoryalpha/en/graphics/banner_468x60_2.gifhttp://memory-alpha.org/"
0
0
0
0
0
0
2b5b6655091ff052
" Well, , a) my RfA was divisive and I barely passed, b) I've only been a practicing admin for about 3 months and, most importantly, c) as a clerk, I can see how hard the arbitrators work and how challenging it is to come to agreement with such a large group (over a dozen) members spread out over many time zones. It's a time-consuming, rather thankless responsibility and just becoming an arbitrator makes one a target for types who are anti-authority. So, if I ever ran, it would have to be at a time when I could devote time to it. I was looking at the history of the committee and I don't think there has been a term without one or more retiring early. People get elected and find out that it might not be the most rewarding experience. That's been my impression. Read! Talk! "
0
0
0
0
0
0
2b5ef605b203f28a
" A Chelsea-persona page sounds excellent but too much resistance: There has been too much arguing to reach a broad consensus for a better solution about Manning. Ideally, we could re-redirect ""Chelsea Manning"" to a new page ""Chelsea Manning (persona)"" to summarize all the massive coverage about Chelsea Manning, in the new persona, plus the history of the new name along with the months/years (""Breanna""?) which led to this notable new name, then include some background leading to the old spy persona, ""Bradley Manning"". A similar fork has been made with ""Audie Murphy"" as the page primarily about his military career, but then his major acting career is covered by ""Audie Murphy filmography"" even though he was far more famous as an actor for 21 years, with older films even shown on network television stations to millions of viewers who did not study World War II. In fact, I was stunned when I read the intro of page ""Audie Murphy"" and it failed to mention ""actor, songwriter"" in the first sentence (only in the infobox). Clearly, Manning will be remembered, far more years, as the transgender whistleblower/spy, because in recent years, ""whistleblowers are a dime a dozen"" even after leaking numerous secret documents. Perhaps many years from now, we will have automated subarticle wizard-bots which will follow obvious rules of notability (e.g., counting related news articles over years from 5,000 top newspapers) and then recommend creating a 2nd article in cases where a person has 2 major identities with vast sources about each, unable to provide NPOV-balanced text within just one page without seeming wp:UNDUE text, with the massive details about the newer persona. The ""transgender spy"" is a huge, huge storyline which will echo for years, much like a person who later became an actor, but under an alias name, as compared to the ordinary ""whistleblower who"" as just one of many. - "
0
0
0
0
0
0
2b607cb38242a734
The early modern treatment of the subject This bit seems all about logic, not specifically about existence. Who defends it?
0
0
0
0
0
0
2b636a544a26fe08
Oppose. It's only confusing if you let yourself be confused. Stick to fixing AFL pages and leave football articles alone.
0
0
0
0
0
0
2b6563923ddbaaf2
You may not like me, but we know where you live, because of your IP address. Please be nice, and don't hurt good articles about music. Join Wikipedia, and contribute something. Why not?
0
0
0
0
0
0
2b65d0728a200963
|decline=You can request an account by email, see the box at the top of this page. }}
0
0
0
0
0
0
2b69d55740474dbb
It's OR. I've never heard that Quack Pack is a spin-off of DuckTales. You will need a reliable source if you want this sort of information to stick.
0
0
0
0
0
0
2b6e20f7f7a95a85
" Erm, to clarify, I didn't say that Punic and Greek warships can be handled together as Hellenistic warships, I merely said that they are usually handled together as belonging to the same chapter in maritime technology. You can check Meijer, the Cambridge history, Casson or Morrison and Coates. In all of them, the warships of the 4th to 1st centuries BC are handled together, whether they were of Punic or Greek type, which is quite natural, as explained above. For the Hellenistic , I agree it is not very accurate, but Morrison at least has written a chapter ""Hellenistic Oared Warships, 399–31 BC"" in AGE OF THE GALLEY in which he includes both Western and Eastern Mediterranean ships. Perhaps a more accurate title for our article would be ""Hellenistic-era warships"" which emphasizes the period and not the culture? Given that the Hellenistic era lasted all the way to the battle of Actium, it would also fit the article's scope. ✍ "
0
0
0
0
0
0
2b6ecc66ddc44d6b
eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!eat my cock you dirty whore!
1
1
1
0
1
0
2b6fcd795a324aac
Reply: I added another, different, quotation from the same article that helps firm up how Russell felt on the subject. I believe this added material compliments rather than hinders the presentation; it makes it more conclusive. Reply: I added another, different, quotation from the same article that helps firm up how Russell felt on the subject. I believe this added material compliments rather than hinders the presentation; it makes it more conclusive. My statement that Russell never suggested organized prohibition on using blood represents the conclusion of a Modus Tollens argument. However, rather than speculating about what Russell did or did not suggest, my statement should have read that Russell never organized a prohibition on using blood among his fellow worshippers. Modus Tollens would have us accept that had Russell, as president of the Watchtower organization, organized a prohibition on using blood among his followers then we would have seen organized prohibition on using blood among his followers. Since there is no record of such an organized prohibition among Russell’s fellow worshippers then the Modus Tollens argument form has us conclude that Russell never organized it. The underlying premises of this particular argument are 1) that Russell applied his presidency and that 2) his fellow worshippers acted on his presidential initiatives. There is ample evidence that Russell applied his presidency, and that his fellows acted on it. Hence, it is not my opinion that Russell never organized a prohibition on using blood among his fellow worshippers. Rather, it is a logical end to a valid argument form based on evidenced premises. For the time being I have removed the statement about Russell and organized prohibition on blood under his presidency. If you dispute the validity of what I write above then please offer logical refutation, keeping in mind that logical constructions and conclusions are not at the mercy of preferential outcomes (i.e., private opinion). I make the latter comment only to demonstrate my commitment to logical conclusions is above my commitment to any personal opinions I may presently hold. If you fail to offer refutation within a reasonable time then I will return my comment to the history section, but in a more precise form.
0
0
0
0
0
0
2b7051fc710bbc4b
Augustine in the Arts, after the Footnotes? Why is that? Can we go ahead and move the Arts section? -
0
0
0
0
0
0
2b71a46cd80ab3f0
Tommy OK, but all the other songs (bar the singles) are non-notable. See also this AfD.
0
0
0
0
0
0
2b7b9afec433617e
Maybe you can offer your two cents then. These linguistic debates are endless. +(Talk)
0
0
0
0
0
0
2b800f95f99a87a1
" Unprotection of WP:SPOILER Could you please unprotect WP:SPOILER? You ""Protected Wikipedia:Spoiler: Exactly the same stupid edit war that got it protected before, unfortunately."" When you said ""Exactly the same stupid edit war that got it protected before"", were you referring to the reason the page got on December 8, 2007 at 22:07 by ? The protection policy says ""During edit wars, administrators should not protect pages when they are involved as a party to the dispute, except in the case of simple vandalism or libel issues against living people."" I believe you are involved as a party to the dispute, having the template which led to WP:SPOILER being without prior discussion on the talk page. I see no reason why WP:SPOILER should be protected for 4 weeks. Could you please reconsider your edit? Thank you. "
0
0
0
0
0
0