id
stringlengths 16
16
| comment_text
stringlengths 6
5k
| toxic
int64 0
1
| severe_toxic
int64 0
1
| obscene
int64 0
1
| threat
int64 0
1
| insult
int64 0
1
| identity_hate
int64 0
1
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
36f9aefa1b60b3a8 | POV-pushing
This is what keeps busy. POV-pushing and edit wars, and it aint over before gets the last word. I think is a disgrace for all admins who are doing a great job, but also problem, a serious threat to this project. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
36fc9249f6317960 | "
She did the usual disappear at Christmas act. Makes me wonder if Franks was in panto or booked extended leave. If that's the case I predict a return by approximately March. George, I thought you actually had spoken to Franks, and she said she wasnt leaving?Moan " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
36fd4f9621e03ce4 | ??? ==
I didn't attack you, you weirdo!
== | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
36fe33110bae750e | "The major permission:
""UNICEF is committed to making information about its programmes and operations available to the public, unless the information is deemed confidential""
""The information in the various pages of the WHO web site is issued by the World Health Organization for general distribution.""
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
37089ca82c9905c3 | (at least I think they were admin) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3708cfb00a3ee10d | "
Radiocarbon dating
Most writings on the DSS say they are mostly dated between 150 BCE and 70 CE. I see the section on radiocarbon dating here mostly falls in that general line (that is also used at the start of this article). I see that one radiocarbon dating cited here says they fall between 385 BCE to 82 CE with ""68%"" reliability (not sure of the correct term used for this part of the dating). Does anyone know a lot about these dating methods? I'm guessing since the 150 BCE to 70 CE is the usual range always given, the 385 BCE is an outlier (as I've never heard any number going back beyond 200 BCE in anything I've read) not sure how this relates to the 68% number provided on that as well. Just wondered if anyone had any background info on that as it can be seen as contradictory (with the usual 150 BCE- 70 CE dating given everywhere else). " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3709046c25993c70 | WHY CAN I NOT POST? PLEASRE UNBLOCK ME I DO NOTHIN WRONG FRENS I DO NOT COMPREHNDE WHAT IS GONE HAPPEN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
370b950a480f71fd | "Your change was determined to be unhelpful and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. _dzast " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
370d4b4fc9857fc0 | yeah, there have been one or two this summer(2006) but I don't think they are important enough to get mention on this article. Anyways this would be original research so untill its published in a book somewhere you couldn't add info about cobdens tornados. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
37163e8bfd33b7e3 | Fuck yourself you self-important web nazi. Deleting an article about a famous little girl with cancer? Wikipedia used to be a free encyclopedia till dipshits like you took over. You and your chrony editors are the definition of the iron law of oligarchy. | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
372bcbf647da5164 | "
Who were the original members and what did they play?
I am unable to be sure who the original members of the band were, how many they were, and what instruments they playe. Even sifting through the opening section leaves me with some uncertainty, although para 2 tells me the original drummer. I know this is a voluntary project, and I'm grateful for there being any info at at all. Nonetheless, after reading the first paragraph I'm unable to answer basic questions like this.
The opening says: ""The Jesus and Mary Chain originally revolved around the songwriting partnership of its two main members, plus third founding member, bass player Douglas Hart. In the early days, Reid's guitar would be left out of tune, while Hart's bass guitar only had two strings""
Who were those two main members? What did they play? One Reid (which one?) plays guitar ... does the other play guitar too? Two main members plus third found member - this implies to me that it was a 3 piece band. Was it? Was the original drummer mentioned in para 2 the other ""main member""?
I'm sorry, but I'm annoyed by articles like this, which seem to assume some starting knowledge on the part of readers and don't specify exact information.
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3731feff8d426fa4 | Series vs. Season?
Is there a good reason that seasons are referred to as series' throughout this page? I don't really keep up on British tv lingo, but typically the collection of episodes that airs during the series' first year is referred to as 'season 1', not 'series 1'. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3732cb7924842698 | "
Additionally, make it be known to Tiptoety, that I am not taking this in my stride, as placing a COI notice does not constitute harrassment. Ask this question. In the said article, is the main author of that article referenced in the sources? Is the main author of that article related to the subject of the article? The answer is yes, therefore, there is a possible conflict of interest. Of course, all of this has now deleted, and they can make up all sorts of conjecture as to motives and the like, but we have already seen one result of their conjecture, haven't we? Tiptoety's insistence that I was blocked for apparently doing the same as Miyokan is not at all credible, as stating ""I know"" to another user (not Miyokan) in an AfD discussion does not constitute outting for if it did, why has said editor not also received a two-week block? Ask that question, coz I sure as hell will be. Dialogue Stalk me " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3732d6e22f51e9fe | "
What I addad
The below was liked. If someone wants to chop this down and add it, be my guest. ~
In 2012, the Journal of Palestine Studies was forced to translate and publish a 1937 letter of David Ben-Gurion after the pressure group CAMERA reported an error made in a journal article written by Pappé. In his article, Pappé had written, ""Ben-Gurion, for example, wrote in a letter to his son in 1937, 'The Arabs will have to go, but one needs an opportune moment for making it happen, such as a war, citing pages 167–68 of David Smith's 2004 Palestine and the Arab-Israeli Conflict. After checking Smith's book for the quote, CAMERA noticed that there had been an error in citation, and wrote to JPS saying so: ""the quote attributed to Ben-Gurion does not appear in the citation provided."" The JPS verified this, but in doing so highlighted something that CAMERA had not:
The JPS, for its part, does not mention that the paperback version of Pappé's book, certainly at least the 2011 reprint, uses (p. 23) the quote with the same mark positioning as the JPS article—""The Arabs will have to go, but one needs an opportune moment for making it happen, such as a war."" The paperback provides different sources to the Smith citation used in the journal article, though: ""Ben-Gurion's Diary, 12 July 1937, and in New Judea, August–September 1937, p. 220.""
Having uncovered these citation errors and discrepancies, the journal decided to go the final step and have the entirety of Ben-Gurion's letter translated into English. The translated letter confirms that, regardless of citation errors, the underlying interpretation of the letter provided by Pappé's article and book was sound. In the letter to his son, Ben-Gurion is quite clear: ""We must expel Arabs and take their place.""" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
373370214077c106 | Understood, was just confused as to how you could change these when already existing ones were clearly evident and have been there for a very long time. Will keep this fact in mind for the future, many thanks. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
373507aa05916484 | . Thanks.
C3po345 18:06, 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3739266447dcfb6f | "
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Jorge Alvarez. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Tropical Cyclone " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
373bdd347ab45cc7 | Yeah, I wasn't going to. Was going to follow the format.TCO () | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
373cce668b8847d0 | Bloody Idiot
You Bloody Freak, Do not Bicker and Sulk...
My Name is Amanbir Singh, And I can take you at all levels... | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
3740bba64d76306f | Thank you! Wishing 1916 will be good for too. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
37425a0b07299f94 | It's now confirmed after last nights Smackdown. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
37438c2f922d53ab | Jolt Cola is still being made and has resorted back to being the original formula and is sold in 12oz glass bottles. It can be ordered through amazon.com as well as on beveragesdirect.com. I personally have ordered it and can say without a doubt it is just like I remember it in the 80's and 90's. 24.229.31.60 Chris | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
37456949c5173018 | "
alexaobrien.com as source
am confused by why alexa o'brien's web page not considered reliable source. for long time, was only source for transcript of casefor two year, if memory right. as well, she receive grant from Freedom of the Press Foundation for work regard Manning's trial, and work host on personal web site shortlisted on reporting award Martha Gellhorn Prize for Journalism. because of background as information architect, has also been able for provide database of original document for trialtranscript, evidence, briefs, so on. is consider journalist by huffington post, who write article on efforts in crafting public docket http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/16/alexa-obrien-bradley-manning_n_3086628.html and has write for guardian on case http://www.theguardian.com/profile/alexa-o-brien . is given respect by journalist ""community"" (ephemeral idea as may be) as member of ranks. for case with specific as underreported as in Manning case, emergent source as in case of alexa o'brien may rise and is right to give due respect in all fora. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
374a9a5940e7d86d | "
Ningombam Bupenda Meitei
Neither the text of the article Ningombam Bupenda Meitei nor any of its references suggests that the subject is suitable as the topic of a Wikipedia article. Please review WP:N and WP:BIO. Please do not remove the maintenance templates until these issues have been resolved. Bongomatic " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
374b4674eb64f6c2 | "
Im not him. But block me anyway. I'll be happy. Why would I edit so long to be a sock puppet. And thankyou for your message but I do quit. I don't understand how you can cope with it here. there's probably more rules than articles. -7 " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
37538a166ad0b27e | Never mind, I see what you meant, you actually wanted to have the David Cross on David Cross (actor). Since David Cross has the longer history, that article would have to be moved to [[David Cross (actor). But I think it should just stay the way it is. (talk) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3753ef488b1e6e19 | I have raised the matter at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/K1 15:07, 15 Jul 2004 (UTC) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3757b153dca8a1fe | So are you saying you don't think the section in the body of the article is sufficient? Additionally, I think adding such a category in the first sentence is not a neutral point of view, especially considering that I checked other prominant figures on Wikipedia and they do not have a similar designation, especially not in the first sentence of their articles. Additionally, while you may disagree with his philosophies and religious beliefs (I do both, myself), I don't think the term is neutral, fair, or correct, especially given his response to the controversy which I assume was the inception of the addition: http://www.hatrack.com/osc_responds_halmets_father.html (added by millernumber1) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
37587256f234d6a8 | "
What's with all of the templates?
Why are there so many {{clarify}} templates in this article against things that appear to be self-evident, and even common knowledge? Like what ""conception"" means? The way this article's headed it's going to need a citation for every word, never mind every sentence. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3758854e71a9769a | The archiving interval at an article talk page is subject to the consensus of editors working on that page. I would welcome a discussion on the article talk. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3761497fd14121ad | Category
Could an admin please change Category:Armenian history to Category:History of Armenia? The former is being renamed. Thanks, 20:15, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
37636eb681066661 | Yohan cabaye
The yohan cabaye info was not incorrect so if you don't want real info on it u can go fuck yourself because Alan pardew did say cabaye was CPFC ces fabregas and he was made fun of by Newcastle fans so u can keep puting bullshit on wiki so people are confused u dumb fuck | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
376556aeabc6e482 | Sounds good to me, I think it could make a good article on its own with just a reference from Floor. Go for it, I can see there's all sorts of stuff like stripping the surface and putting on a new protective layer, getting the right traction, what leaving a wood floor wet can do, what the various types of brushes do and those opening V sweepers with replaceable covers, the history of it. Well there's a fair amount. Floor enthusiast, hmmm, I think perhaps I'll just join Bert's rubber band and paper clip enthusiasts society instead. Do you know your rubber band collection lasts better if you keep it in the fridge? ;-) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
37703cb684053585 | Well then there isn't even a source included on that page! Maybe you should think about that! If you didn't get your info from Soap Central, then where did you get it? Because apparently you didn't get the word for word actors and actresses (and airdates) from Soap Central! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
377160633d639dd6 | October 2009
You have a lot to learn about the way things work around here, evidently. Among the most basic rules we have are WP:CIVILITY, WP:NPA, WP:RS, and WP:V. The material from the encyclopedias is all material which meets WP:RS and WP:V. Your own recent comments violate both WP:CIVILITY and WP:NPA. The only grounds for removing sourced materisl are either WP:UNDUE or if consensus, as per [{WP:CONSENSUS]], is reached to remove them. I suggest you read each of the pages linked to above before engaging in any other conduct which is counterproductive and could potentially create problems. Please consider this a formal warning to cease engaging in such problematic conduct. Thank you. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3771f50df58ba85b | "
Also ""Vande Velde is very creative"" is hardly anything but awkward." | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
37780db1df2c7075 | . A polite reply would have sufficed | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
37814d57da685609 | Look at this, further examples, of this user ():
Wikipedia guidelines ask you to use the edit summary; the template that I used is a standard one, not created by me. The same applies to policies and guidelines such as WP:CITE and WP:CIVIL. Your behaviour here is poor, you response to advice and criticism particularly so. If you can't or won't understand what it is to edit here, with other people rather than pitted against them, you'll find it an unpleasant and frustrating experience. If you're prepared to learn, and to edit reasonably and responsibly, in line with our policies and guidelines, then you'll find it rewarding and enjoyable. It's entirely up to you, of course. Mel Etitis (Talk)
Everything that has a beginning must have an end. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
37829fc9504cf175 | If it helps at all, I was left this which is clearly from the editor in question and is from IP 172.191.246.20. - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3786b2407d435fe2 | Sun (with Solaris) always distributed the original software, the same applies to Slackware. Recently, most Linux distributions started to distribute the original cdrtools again. Debian did agree on Marh 6th 2009 (at CeBIT) to distribute the original cdrtools again (although Debian is soooooo slooooow with doing the right things and we are still waiting for the contract to be implemented by Debian - the binary packages are waiting for integration since 5 months) and Suse distributes cdrtools again since two months. It seems that only RedHat defies to do things to the benefit of the users. The attack against the cdrtools project that created the fork seems to have been revealed as an attack against the Linux users as it is obvious that Linux users do not like to be forced to use a buggy fork while the maintained original software is legally available. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3793229204624f57 | Hi mate, I decided to let this one bounce around in the back of my head for a while before I came up with what I think is appropriate wording to provide context without prejudice, but let me know what you think... Cheers, | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
379f5d3d5fb55fd8 | "::Thanks a lot, ZooFari! I think you keep checking your adoptee's talk page! nivas
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
37a7a1eacf464e57 | I'm not sure, but is this the Jewel of Affection
that allows the charisma or charm enchancement in AD&D;? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
37af35e0a4e16d5c | I'm coming at this as a relative outsider, but I really don't think that the award should be in the lead. The reason? Whether it's good or bad, it isn't what he's known for; it isn't what makes him notable; it's not what people would be looking up this article for. Therefore, there may be reason to have it in the article, but there's also reason to keep it out of the lead. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
37b0ad9fe123a19e | Null page vandalism?
What are you talking about in your message? I've never seen that page before yet you accuse me of vandalism, check the history page before you start sending out messages. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
37b8e03dfb74bc16 | And thank you! It's been a long ride. I intend not to touch this article again for a long time. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
37ba750d9739c913 | That's ok then! I was thinking of this definition of 'indefinite' - as in 'infinite'. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
37bb9a10f663ef38 | So make one then | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
37bc458d05cf061f | "
Jack Clift
Hello Number 57,
I would appreciate it if you would respond to me concerning the article ""Jack Clift"".
Can you please repost or send me the article that you deleted?
thank you,
Ben" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
37bd9ef44be3145d | The history section is poorly cited. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
37bf95c1cea4d470 | This edit shows that you are not at all interested in a neutral, encyclopedic article. Which of the cult-basher cliques do you hang out with? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
37c04d928a28400c | Fuck u hope your lanchiau will rot and drop off ! | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
37c2b331e721a3a3 | Rhodesian Bush War to Second Chimurenga name change?
There's currently some discussion going on the talk page Talk:Rhodesian Bush War. One user has proposed changing the name of the article Rhodesian Bush War to second Chimurenga. There appears to be some support and some opposition. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
37cc285a1d8f22d0 | Magical Realism Reconsidered
I'm looking forward to working with your class during the semester - if you have any questions about the project or Wikipedia in general, please feel free to leave me a note at User talk:Awadewit. Wikipedians are here to help you! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
37cd04bdf388690c | "
The fact that you felt the need to use the term ""markboard"" demonstrates that you are as illiterate and ignorant about professional wrestling as those you would attempt to chastize in your remarks. Just as not everyone will feel that the Mona Lisa is not a work of art to be treasured through the ages, the same can be said and applied to professional wrestling websites in defining what does or does not identify it as a ""markboard."" Then of course there is your allegation of theft of information, yet you do not back up any of your allegations with proof or links...though a quick check of your history on Wikipedia shows this is not exactly something you are unfamiliar with, having attacked a user for being a ""markboy"" and ""mark"" for the particular handle he chose to register with.
I would suggest you refrain from attempting to chastize others on defining what is or is not a ""markboard"" until you yourself have had the opportunity to put down the cardboard sign and re-evaluate your own stance on how you view your relationship with others in regards to name-calling and labelling based on a simple edit on Wikipedia.
I also do not see how you are the authority on being able to define anything on what does or does not constitute an entry on this page. Please do not try to ""armchair"" this entry, as Wikipedia is a free forum to be edited by all. Should someone choose to post spoilers, they can simply label it as such and you can choose not to read them. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
37cd12be872253d9 | Trouted
You have been trouted for: ?B/ for life go kill urslef really this site sucks you are a joke really get a life go out into the world | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
37cdebbf41ab213e | "
Removing warnings is fine – ignoring them is not. Their language and appearance is (primarily) not mine – it is from templates that reflect what the community has decided is appropriate. It is not a single small issue, but several, repeated issues (please do see the diffs I provided and the content to which they refer). I am doing nothing more than replying to what the three of you brought to my talk page. I do believe that the next edit showing ignorance of the repeated warnings, and now discussion by multiple editors, should be dealt with more strongly, per policy. His attitude has shown very little indication that he would accept mentoring, but it is good of you to attempt it. I wish you luck. —[]— " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
37ce27292e65b492 | Hi EdJohnston. I found them. Thank you for noticing my request and making such a friendly offer. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
37d19e98824e0639 | """After Gorgeous' aunt accepts her to visit"", which should probably read, ""After Gorgeous' aunt agrees Gorgeous can visit"" or ""After Gorgeous' aunt invites her to visit""" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
37d748cf417b4dee | It has been 25 years since I read Jung's book on synchronicity, but there is a summary at the back of the book describing the acausal conncecting principal. While I can see that there are similarities in the 2 philosophies of Astrology & Synchronicity, I do not see that the primary source (Jung) was referring to astrology at the time that he described the principal.
However, I am willing to re-read any (few) pages of Jung's works you cite. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
37dedf8b4ae87580 | I see you have a snub for every game, why are they not coalated on one page under a viaent title. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
37e0d5464d863c9e | And the first time a different IP actually removed those changes. I kinda see that maybe protecting the article for 3 months or something might have made life easier as its just a redirect, but really I'm not convinced that it should be semi-protected forever. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
37e6a64405f021e9 | Minor actors and actresses in Harry Potter | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
37ed9ebad02613cb | "
Cynwulfe and Davidiad, I think you got a fine piece of work here. I'll do a review. Let me get a couple of quick and simple questions out of the wayI hope you don't mind a piecemeal approach; I find that it helps to get things out of the way on a first read.
Why Tzetzes, and not John Tzetzes? I clicked through to see if it was a title that needed to be italicized. Also, I'm a great fan of the appositive/adjectival introduction, ""the twelfth-century Byzantine poet and grammarian John Tzetzes"" (and in that case you can drop John).
""The poet completes his treatment""we don't know the poet's gender, and the appropriate section says nothing about it. Consider that the poetic phallus is not a penis. )
More later: apparently laundry takes precedence over poetry. I know, it's a fucked-up world.
Done. Thanks, Drmies. It was just Tzetzes because that's what I call him, forgetting that even some classicists have never read of him (and that his poor brother Isaac wallowed with him). { t }
Do we need to do the GA subpage thang? { t }
I don't know, DavidiadI just started the template and it looks like hell. If you can fix it that'd be great. This isn't some fill in the blank kind of thing. Also, please define ""verse"" at its first occurrence, possibly connecting it with ""line"" which is wikilinked nearby.
Stuck in a link to dactylic hexameter for now. Currently making dinner—will think of a more graceful and efficient way to keep the concepts of verse and stichometry at the fore: this while trying to retain the ridiculous construction ""in part or entire"" which strains the copulative properties of ""survive"". { t }
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
37f3ddfc6616aed0 | Is an elf with its head between its legs a goblin? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3808b8796bc2f884 | Also, it is said here that Benfica, along with Sporting and Porto, has never been relegated, which is a lie (Arouca has never been relegated too). | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
38092efb5a27ab4c | I was bored and it killed time 188.222.227.22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
380d9cd3ccca0e03 | Could You Be a Bigger Dick if you Tried ?
LMAO- locking pages dude ? Dude, it's Wikipedia, not Encyclopedia Brittanica. Were you this much fun in high school too ? Killing the buzz of some Tampa fans trying to have fun with our new coach's page. Oh wait, you're an Eagles fan - nevermind. I bet you're as fat as Andy Reid too. | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
380da636e89906b1 | Fellow Fidel Castro editor
Hello, Zleitzen (I'm assuming you've returned). Have you seen 's User page? He's got us all branded as 'Fidel Castro' lovers. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
380e93194358a694 | Help wanted
Hi, Professor. I have translated your userpage as requested. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
380eb76710b2a567 | Kings Theatre, Portsmouth
Sorry I was unable to find a way of replying as I am new to Wikipedia. I am unsure what you mean about moving our prefered title to Kings Theatre, Southsea. This is causing troubles for us, as many people use google to find us and is confusing the branding. Is there anyway of changing the Title of Kings Theatre, Southsea to Portsmouth as its the biggest problem of them all. The ownership etc can be dealt with at a later date. Many Thanks | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
381584df1d5ec49f | "
==AfD nomination of Big Five Pageants==
I've nominated Big Five Pageants, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Big Five Pageants satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also ""What Wikipedia is not"" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Five Pageants and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Big Five Pageants during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you." | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
381ee225f50dda85 | couldn't find it
Understood. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
38234db23b20d082 | I agree - but would also add that the entire 'debate' is unproductive in the first place, which would be why many (including myself) have chosen to ignore it. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
382438cb62ef3419 | I am not trolling, Friday... You could just have asked me. I'm going to say it again, not to joke or anything: I am not trolling, Friday!
I care about Wikipedia and I try to help it the way I think is the best. I am still trying to find out what I can do here. I do think about it. Editing articles is not the only thing that one can do for Wikipedia and the fact that I don't do it much means pretty much nothing as to my real contributions to the encyclopedia.
Since I am not a troll and some people see my actions as trolling, I do agree that I should think about it and try to change my approach. And I am! That's exactly what I am trying to do right now, by showing people a decent and workable way out of the current administrator problem. Yes, I think much of the problems that are happening here would be pretty much solved with the new approach that I suggested on StuRat's talk page. I am aware that a lot of other people have had the basic same ideas before, but I presented some true solutions to a lot of objections that people could have to the new system.
People have not written me off as a troll! Lewis, Rockpocket, Nick, JackofOz, StuRat and other people whose name I don't remember now don't think I am a troll. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
382442ebfdd80665 | I'm surprised that you're having trouble finding reliable sources containing her birth name. It took ne 10 seconds to find the Guardian article (cited) which talks at length about her birth name. I see articles in the Telegraph, The Daily Mail (she's apparently suing the Mail for claiming Jack is not her 'real' name - sound trivial?), The Independent, Pink News and... in pieces (plural) her own website. The subject seems to think it's relevant but you don't? How odd. It's staying unless arbitration says otherwise. 82.41.251.96 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3829a3e13de6d7e9 | "
This RS question is whether Stephen Hill, the cofounder of a notable niche music genre, ""spacemusic"", can be disqualified as a secondary source expert, and have his radio production company's website (= expert's book) reclassified with primary source usage restrictions (results in removal).
The radio production company is Hearts of Space established 25 years ago (35 including the original Music From the Hearts of Space show on KPFA). HoS was historically played on more than 250 USA public radio stations on a scale of 500. This 2004-01-11 San Francisco Chronicle description of Stephen Hill's expertise reads:
""Hill, who coined the term ""spacemusic"" more than 20 years ago, hosts the ""Music From the Hearts of Space"" music program, syndicated on 250 National Public Radio stations, including San Francisco's KALW 91.7 FM, which airs two hours of the program at 10 p.m. Sundays. In addition, Hill's Hearts of Space Web site (www.hos.com) provides streaming access to an archive of hundreds of hours of spacemusic artfully blended into one-hour programs combining ambient, electronic, world, New Age and classical music.""
The claim as I understand it (maybe I don't), is that a justified primary source reclassification, along with other sources properly reclassified as primary, would cause a synthesis/OR violation in the article titled Space music. The further result would be that the cofounder's detailed analysis, opinions, and other website information would be mostly removed from the article about the genre he cofounded.
The campaigning editor says his most contentious objection is that the name of the genre is a ""commercial entity's branding drive"". Presumably, he objects strongly to a previously unnoticed form of commercial spam in the Wikipedia article, and a great wrong should be righted by minimizing it. If I correctly understand it, I can only describe this position as extremist.
Spacemusic genre is a case of limited circle fame. Its current USA public radio fans are thinly scattered, but dedicated to its support through public radio fund drives. Its niche music sales amount to less than 1% of the commercial market, so very little is written about spacemusic in major USA music publications dependent on commercial advertising.
(The rest of the 102 Space music sources to be considered for reclassification as primary, and then removed for synthesis/OR, should be handled separately to avoid noticeboard overload.)
I suppose all this would give some reason for caution in using these sources, and particularly a reason to be careful to try to double-source things and to give all sides where sources disagree, but it sounds to me like Hill would be a perfectly reasonable source. Where he is writing about his own work in fostering the genre, or about his own show, he's primary. Where he's writing about the musicians in the genre, it would seem to me that he is secondary, just like any music critic. - | Talk
I agree with on all three points - multiple sources are always recommended when there are differing published views on a topic. On the primary/secondary question - Hill would be a primary source when writing about himself and his own radio show. On third-party topics such as music styles, record albums, musicians, the radio and music business, etc, he'd be a secondary source. I'd say that within his area of expertise, there's no reason not to use his work as a reliable source.
Just to be clear about the encyclopedia-margins deletionist effect of what you are both saying:
Stephen Hill and his Hearts of Space website were previously treated as expert-based secondary sources via WP:V(WP:SPS). The Wikipedia art/music reasoning has previously been that the founder of an art/music genre knows subjectively more about what he/she created than anyone else as a matter of expert opinion. You are changing that.
What a secondary source says can be combined in a point-by-point source-provable editorial analysis. In this case, since there are so few other mainstream sources, many or most of them are presently combined with Hill's previous secondary source expertise to write the article.
But a primary source has fewer rights in an article than a secondary source. What a primary source says cannot be combined with other sources for a standard article editorial analysis, even if every point made by article editors can be proved through analysis of t | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
382b5cfcec8c9cbb | I did, these people are from the modern state of India. PacificWarrior101 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
382e696115c7e217 | "I find it humorous in light of the article that we would be having a debate over any question of categorizing her when she has stated that she will not do so (I see no ""plea"" but the implied plea to let the issue alone). Leave the little section in the article invoking the controversy, and let her keep her mystery going (at this point, any conclusion one might draw after reviewing her music as she suggests in the interview would by definition be opinion, synthesis, and OR; fun, but not appropriate for encyclopedia).
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
382fc3ae76a56d8d | these issues are only being used to smear. facts no one cares. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
383e556179ebf391 | "== ""Vengeful"" voting ==
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
384ac7dbeb9ad845 | Brigham Young University Wikiproject
This new wikiproject has been proposed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals#Brigham Young University. Please sign up in order to improve the quality of BYU related articles on wikipedia, including BYU-Idaho and BYU-Hawaii. Thanks. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
384ed71e846ad79a | As you noticed, I deleted it, meaning that I regretted it, and as you may have noticed, I deleted it within the same minute or so, so when you do decide to go to someone else's talk page, just make sure what you are saying is worth saying, because I know wikipedia, maybe not as well as some, but well enough to know how the history works. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3853545845b25a97 | Image copyright problem with Image:Never give in.JPG
Thank you for uploading Image:Never give in.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
38554fd17fe37bbf | The article split is based on title - a duke becoming king of some other country was considered enough to separate the two house articles. I suppose the information could be merged, given that it seems to be only based on title. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
385ba6ae8b7743d3 | Please see this link . I don't believe that there was any adverse action taken towards Ramdrake as a result. It may just be certain types of articles he has a problem with like the race-related ones, I don't know. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3860f0757a850495 | Trolls
You have my email. if this kind of disgusting behaviour continues please let me know but I would urge you to take the PP's to arbcom as they are clearly here on a mission. I have some other ideas too. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3863cd2d68bb00e4 | Then go and see what kind of insults I am getting from Fadix on Radjabov's site. Talking to somebody he calls me a kid because of some contributions to Aronian's page. What was wrong in Aronian's page? Instead of threatening me to block forever( Oh yeah, I am going to lose a fortune, by not contributing to wikipedia, there are so many other nice sites) better watch others and your behavior as well (I can and I will) no you can not and you will not. And do me another favor, tell me how to close my account in wikipedia. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3867d2c4dfaf74e3 | "And this is what happens when you don't read books. As for Olga and Gilliard, their stories changed very, very much from the days in Berlin until January 1926. Olga said afterwards that ""she understood no Russian."" Then, in a letter to Mordvinov, she writes:""Curiously, she seems to understand Russian."" She said ""She understood no English"". Then Bella Cohen writes in her article in NY Times that she spoke in English to the invalid, and she answered back in English. Olga said: ""My nieces knew no German"". And we have copy of a post card written by Tatiana already in 1909 showing good knowledge of German. We have schoolbooks from Anastasia showing that she took serious lessons in German. Olga said, I knew I was looking at a stranger. But in Berlin, she said: ""I believe in my heart that she is Anastasia"", something she also repeated to Bella Cohen. She said: ""We showed her photos, and she did not react."" Bella Cohen writes about how AA recognized Shura in a photo where Shura's face was hidden by a bell. Olga ""left Berlin with all hope extinguished."" The very same day she writes her mother's secretary saying: ""How shall I tell Mama, this will kill her."" (""Mama"" would have been devastated by knowing her grandchild was alive, that would mean that the others had perished.) And she tells Frau Rathlef about how she would like to help ""the little one"", but has no money. Gilliard calls her ""La Grande Duchesse"" in front of Dr. Rudnev, and afterwords said that the woman in Berlin had ""nothing in common with the Grand Duchess apart from the color of the eyes."" And that is after his own wife has shown him the congenital bilateral hallux valgus, the scars on the shoulder and the finger. And according to Shura, she had the same hair color ""with the same wave"". Clearly these two were lying, their own writings tell us that. , Olga wrote to the unknown woman after the visit: ""You are no longer alone, and we shall not abandon you."" ""Longing to see you."" ""I remember when we were together."" Would she write this to a total stranger? Would she give her personal photo album to FS? I don't think so. And don't forget that Frau Rathlef sent her manuscript to Olga for verification, and got it back with the words that the description of the time in Berlin was ""quite corret.""
ChatNoir
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
386b62dc67bcb66c | Son of a bitchSon of a bitch | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
387174da23f8f02c | I have learned your secret pastime | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
387cc810e55f2c63 | Major controversial changes
There are many very major & controversial changes made by user B. to the article. I placed a tag waiting for further comments. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
387e4ae9a5733051 | "
well that guide line says ""or was when they became notable"" ... carmen miranda never was natural or had citizenship of brazil when she bacame famouse ... And the ideia of saying one can say she is from and born on brazil is just outragiose sorry ...
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
38808406c30834be | Where can i find the murder charges, the french twin of this article which i am translating does not have any link to this charge, do you have any WP:RS about this ? newspaper, court case, or something smiler ? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
38829dfed1fd8bf5 | Can you help the article Silent Note that it wont get deleted | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3886442760f4db73 | Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. - (山本一郎)(会話) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3888c875d6a6a680 | "
He isnt listed under ""Other"" though, last I checked... Only 5th Division... But I agree, removing the ToC limit would help in seeing who is actually listed on this page. (Got a present for ya! | Mission Log) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
388c427a4da0651e | Dr.Macrossan's link which you are censoring contains many highly reputed sources: SirEdmund Wittaker, Keswani in the British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Professor Winterberg, etc etc are anything but fringe sources, you just don't like whatthey all say. Restore the link which you are censoring. 173.169.90.98 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
388e5f181f703a52 | North Shoreman, which relevant and specific article do you suggest for the material I added? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3891c1ad7d99a83c | Subaru Forester image
Please stop inserting the additional gallery image into Subaru Forester. It is redundant to existing images, is not of particularly high quality, and messes up the page rendering. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.