id
stringlengths
16
16
comment_text
stringlengths
6
5k
toxic
int64
0
1
severe_toxic
int64
0
1
obscene
int64
0
1
threat
int64
0
1
insult
int64
0
1
identity_hate
int64
0
1
4dce8d82b7a9d0d7
" Barnstar The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar For your tireless work against vandalism (and beating me to over 15 consecutive reverts). Keep up the great work! You beat me to about 15 reverts in a row on Huggle (I had to check that Huggle and my internet were working correctly because nothing was being reverted P) and I figured you were deserving of this ). Best, "
0
0
0
0
0
0
4dcedc9ff7bc0b37
I have also found a page in English of the association that re-enacts the Battle of Tolentino.
0
0
0
0
0
0
4dd17660a46f28cc
Proof that this is a common proxy server:- http://whatismyipaddress.com/ip/14.139.128.14
0
0
0
0
0
0
4dd1de39191349c2
Oh, I forgot to mention, you have made yourself a very powerful enemy kid.
0
0
0
0
0
0
4dd2119227014855
" Croatia ramifications I think that the accession of Croatia (and Slovenia for that matter) have more relevance to this article than currently comes through, but I am not sure where to add it in. Any suggestions? Here are some references that are relevant: —Zujine|talk "
0
0
0
0
0
0
4dd44a8a183ed59f
" Libertatia> ""It strikes me that the an-cap vision being presented here makes the freedom of the market primary, and the freedom of individuals secondary."" No, you have it backwards. Freedom of individuals is the primary; freedom of the market is simply the application of freedom of individuals with respect to production and trade. Libertatia> ""Anarchism has never been whatever remains in the absence of the state"" Right. Anarchism is the philosophy with the goal absense of State. Of course, anarchists can have other values, too. E.g. We have various additional values which we want in addition to no state. But statelessness is the primary and defining value of anarchism. Libertatia> ""No capitalist I know of espouses capitalism on a moral basis ..."" ??? Rand, Rothbard, Hoppe, hell, just about every anarcho-capitalist I know bases it on the NAP (non-aggression principle) except Friedman and Narveson. Libertatia> ""... on the basis it ""knows"" what is best for everyone."" Right. We generally abhor utilitarianism, but of course that is not the only moral basis. We tend to prefer Natural Law rather than utilitarian moral justifications. Libertatia> ""Capitalism, like evolution, is nothing more than a blind algorithmic process, which tends to have a certain effect in terms of efficient allocation of resources. It is entirely agnostic, of itself, to ""what's best for the society"", or even whether there is a society..."" Right on. We see society more as an ecosystem with emergent order, as opposed to the statist view of society as a machine to be fixed by some imposed planned order. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
4dd4cf15b772b361
Ok, here is someone directly involved with the show making a statement that a season 2 is possible. From Seth MacFarlane's official twitter, and also this article. I will point out, however, that it appears Neil may remain as those host, if it happens.
0
0
0
0
0
0
4dd5048264f0eed7
I'll also add that I meant to say there was no 2008 model year in north america, not the US. Sorry for that.
0
0
0
0
0
0
4dddeaaa788fc23e
I disagree; although I would have no problem with weighting the treatment here in terms of what the Obama campaign actively did with the controversy, e.g. both damage control and reiterating the philosophical statement he was trying to articulate in the speech. Obama was the person who said these words, and he is running against Romney, so it seems relevant.
0
0
0
0
0
0
4de22b8eda574177
" Broad search simply for the definition Here's another approach. To make sure my research isn't tainted by cherrypicking, I typed a neutral term into google: ""Definition Beat Generation"". Here are the defnitions that I found going through four google pages, only excluding repition and irrelevant sites. These are hardly formal sources, but the purpose of this exercise is to show that confusion about this term and how it is to be used is a genuine issue. Simply saying the one definition is the ""majority"" without putting effort into supporting the claim is not a valid way to prove a point. Sources that place subculture/generation first and group of writers second: http://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/the-Beat-Generation http://encarta.msn.com/dictionary_1861685998/Beat_Generation.html Sources that place group of writers first, subculture/generation second, and also mention ""artists"": http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Beat+Generation http://www.directhit.com/ansres/Beat-Generation-Definition.html Sources that only mention the group of writers, not the subculture/generation: http://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/beat+generation Sources that only mention the group of writers, not the subculture/generation, but also mention ""artists"": http://www.answers.com/topic/beat-generation Sources that only mention the subculture/generation, not the group of writers: http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=beat%20generation http://www.audioenglish.net/dictionary/beat_generation.htm http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/the-beat-generation http://www.bluesforpeace.com/beat.htm http://www.mnemonicdictionary.com/word/beat [If this method genuinely points to a ""majority"" opinion, then clearly this would be it] Iffy: http://www.gradesaver.com/dharma-bums/study-guide/section8/ http://www.oxfordadvancedlearnersdictionary.com/dictionary/beat-generation Now for serious sources I encountered when typing the same term into Google Book search: Lawlor here identifies the exact problem I identified as being the major problem with this page. A page like this which strives for accuracy should acknowledge that there is no set definition (no ""majority"", no consus) on how the term should be used: ""Several key questions are central to the study of the Beat Generation. The first is whether a Beat Generation actually exists. If the Beat Generation consists of Kerouac, Ginsberg, Burroughs, and a few others, then the Beat Generation does not exist because a generation cannot be based on just a few people. On the other hand, if the Beat Generation includes dozens and dozens of artists, including not only writers but also dancers, painters, sculptors, musicians, then the Beat Generation does not exist because the concept is too loose, too vague."" William Lawlor. Beat culture: lifestyles, icons, and impact. ABC-CLIO, 2005 ISBN 1851094008, 9781851094004. pg. 78. For this one, there may be some confusion by what Kerouac means by “people who had been beaten down” since that could apply to either the small group or the broader subculture. However, Morgan provides the same definition I presented earlier in which Kerouac identifies it as “certain members of the generation that came of age after World War II who affected detachment,” etc. It’s conceivable that one might argue Kerouac meant his group of friends by “certain people, but from many other sources, he meant the broader subculture (open for debate, but let’s have that debate instead of blindly dismissing without evidence to support counterclaims). Here’s the quote from Morgan: “Once the press began to identify those writers collectively as ‘the Beat Generation,’ some within the group began to struggle with a definition for the word beat. Since it was Jack Kerouac who had originally coined the phrase, he was asked repeatedly what he meant by it. Initially he said that the Beat Generation was composed of people who had been beaten down, worn out, and exhausted. As time passed, he refined his definition to emphasize the beatific, blessed, or sympathetic qualities of his generation.” Bill Morgan, William Morgan. The Typewriter Is Holy: The Complete, Uncensored History of the Beat Generation. Simon and Schuster, 2010. ISBN 1416592423, 9781416592426. There's more, but I'm out of time. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
4de2c6296aa720db
"- SlimVirgin [wrote It appears that a small group of editors, currently consisting of User:FuelWagon and User:Duckecho have taken ownership of this page and won't allow others to edit without their consent. This isn't allowed. This was in response to SlimVirgin's massive edit, discussed above with all its problems. I reverted his edit because of all teh problems listed above. And rather than admit it's a bad edit, he accuses me of ""taking ownership"" of the article. Fixing a bad edit === ownership???? No acknowledgement of this accusation being false, misplaced, or otherwise misdirected has been forthcoming. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
4de8751bda22769f
REDIRECT Talk:European Championships of Ski Mountaineering
0
0
0
0
0
0
4ded703b8688bdeb
So, in conclusion, the whole issue with me being involved with Brews is not motivated by some unconditional support for him. Rather, there are real issues regarding editing Wikipedia here that are perhaps a bit hidden from view. And in such disputes, I always tell Brews to take into account opposition against his edits and try to make modifications to get the necessary consensus.
0
0
0
0
0
0
4df1e7583bbb5a14
" General update I've expanded the article in general and corrected some of the English, namely some literal translations and ""false friends"". For example, it was written that Castelao was an ""universalist"", when Universalism in English is a religion (wiki it ;)). The correct translation from the Galician universalista / universalismo when speaking about politics is ""internationalist / internationalism"", and so on. Also, I have serious doubts about what's said in reference to the translations of his works... Only a handful of his short stories are translated into English as far as I know, and I don't think there's many translations around in other languages. Even his key work Sempre en Galiza is only available in the original (I think it's only now that someone is starting to translate it, into English). Most of the info I've added is from Sempre en Galiza, as this book gives lots of bibliographical information."
0
0
0
0
0
0
4dfb82835c80aa9b
"==Changing A Title== Do you know how I can change the capitalization in the title of an article I have written? The article is called ""Hot prowl burglary,"" but I want it to read ""Hot Prowl Burglary."" If you're aware of how I can make this change, please let me know. Thanks. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
4dfbf1bf515f827e
Oh wait, disregard that I suck cocks
1
0
0
0
0
0
4e0503e1abf40618
" I changed ""ignore"" to ""do not agree."" To me, that's the most neutral. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
4e07f7dc912ccd25
Invitation to Inquiry Yath, you are cordially invited to join Inquiry.
0
0
0
0
0
0
4e0aa014d5b7ad3a
newspapers all over the world The claims about the coverage Vuia's tall tale recieved are not borne out by the reference. And the reference itself is full of provably false claims. Nature never did an article about vuia, only the French La Nature did, and the New York coverage they claim was in 1907, and was about a 1907 flight which wasn't any more sucessful than his 1906 attempts. This last should be obvious- when's the last time you saw a newspaper run an article about something from the previous year?
0
0
0
0
0
0
4e0d21315f15baa3
""" That's incorrect. It wasn't vandalism, nor was it continuous. I justified the edit in the first instance, as is the appropriate practice. I repeated the edit once, and will not repeat it again without good cause. Your knee-jerk reaction is inappropriate. Warnings are always mandated, and caution in threatening proxied IP addresses strongly advised. You seem to be ill-informed about the situation overall, and judging by the rather MySpace quality of your own user page, I'm not at all surprised. And you call yourself a terrorist? I didn't block the above username at this time. Can you clarify what you feel is wrong with the name? I'd like to discuss it with the user (particularly since he seems to be making useful edits) before I block the name. Is it that you feel it's too long? Or somehow offensive? Please let me know, so I can talk to him about it. Thanks! Talk "
0
0
0
0
0
0
4e0f04c1135e7e31
Sitush..you are a wonderful cleaner..infact I appreciate your contributions in wiki so far..but we should atleast should not remove the True contents and history which are real and well known in India..and ancient kshatriya tribes have little recorded due to the indifference and discrimination during british..no doubt that historian Colonel James tod was biased towards rajputs but the historian was nota at all biased towards meenas. As you know the people who sacrifices thier live for country like meenas,bheels,gujjars didnt get recognition..Under the influence of their ally Rajput kingdoms, British were biased towards Minas, Jats and Bheels. Hence they do not wrote much about the legacy of their ancient empires. the British were very harsh in dealing with these people. Thus Russell and Hiralal 'views' regarding Minas being 'bandits' is biased and baseless....I hope you are understanding the truth regarding that article..so please add some previous paras which are cited,true and Authentic. AND atlast we are here to present the True history.I hope you will reinsert some paras which are Authentic.Thanks.
0
0
0
0
0
0
4e10bff145018787
" YOU ARE BLOCKED IN LIFE FOREVER AND FOR LIFE INDEFINITELY, YOU TRASHY DUSTBIN YOU ARE A TRASHY DUSTBIN WHO IS BLOCKED IN LIFE AND FOR LIFE INDEFINITELY It can be so obviously seen that you have no life in reality and hence you carry on with editing pages on Wikipedia,which is another big joke, like you. In fact, it is jokers like you that make Wikipedia an unreliable piece of crap that the world laughs on. You thought you can block users who edit articles that are wrongly written to project a ""good"" image like that C-grade item song sleaze actress Payal Rohatgi. On the account of hello5678, when I edited to write the truth, since I work with the media and knew the actual truth, you did what you knew best - to block accounts and even have the foolish audacity to write that it did not seem I was a journalist. Your block anyways went futile ( like all your remaining blocks on other users go, and future blocks will be going ) since as I had said, there are a million computers to comment and reply from. It just depends on my wish if I want to respond to idle losers like you and whether I have the time to do so. Once and for all, I am doing it this time, and won't remove time for worthless people like you again. You had some advice on how I should spend my ""blocked time"" by reading WP:Dispute pages on Wikipedia so that I have better ideas on dealing with disputes. Actually ,you need better ideas to deal with life. I am not foolish like you to spend any amount of my time bothering about rubbish written by stupid people like you who have no work in real life and spend days editing pages on Wikipedia/ Scribblebook that no one bothers to read. Some people are just unfortunate like you and 2over0. And if you are troubled by my calling that actress ""sleazy"", then that's your problem. Cos that's the only work she has done and the press uses precisely that term while referencing her work. You also spoke about writing ""accurate"" information on wikipedia. Ironic, when you don't even bother finding out what is accurate, and spend endless hours blocking, and acting admin as if it is an important position in yourCarry on with your scribble game. And if you feel threatened by media exposure, then that shows you knew you were wrong. It's only when people are wrong that they feel threatened. Pity your personality. Also, you ended by writing that "" it's clear you aren't a journalist, and have no means of carrying out your threat "" - LOL. Sad, that you lived in that illusion. For JOKERS like you who are totally idle,and who scribble away in virtual life. Oh wait, that may be the only position you probably have or will have ever in your unfortunate life. Carry on with your scribble game. And if you feel threatened by media exposure, then that shows you knew you were wrong. It's only when people are wrong that they feel threatened. Pity your personality. Also, you ended by writing that "" it's clear you aren't a journalist, and have no means of carrying out your threat "" - LOL. Sad, that you lived in that illusion. For JOKERS like you who are totally idle,and who scribble away in virtual pages on Wiki-scribble-pedia, will obviously withdraw from the truth. You yourself have no idea at all if I am a journalist, and you write that it's clear that I am not. Well, you are also inane and a clown to fool yourself. I had all means, and the said article has already been published. I had NO TIME to let you know, since I am a busy person, unlike you and do not find time to come scribble on virtual pages that clowns like you , 2OVERO, 2/0, AKERANS, MANAGERARC, FISHERQUEEN (yeah, we named you again - Suck it up), KURU etc. do all your life. You will find that information, depending on which Godforsaken part of the world you live in. And like last time, you can go ahead and block me this time too. For , no one cares two hoots for your silly blocking games. We do have a life, unlike losers like you. Maybe its time for you to go fish in real life, so that you can come anywhere remotely close to having a life - LOL. SO, LOSERQUEEN, GROW UP and GET A LIFE, You IDLE CLOWN OR ELSE, YOU WILL REMAIN A LOSER ALL YOUR LIFE. WHO CARES ANYWAY WHAT INANE, PUERILE LOSERS LIKE YOU DO IN THEIR LIVES. Cos all you know best is to play edit and block games on your scribblebook called wikipedia. Scribble on cos anyway no one cares and I most certainly don't. Time for you to go fishing then, LOSERQUEEN. And I wont bother to check any replies or anything else ever, cos I dont have time unlike Idle LOSERS like you, Loserqueen. You are no where near a queen, but certainly are a huge ,filled with trash, dustbin. Pity you, unfortunate daft-LOSER- DUSTBIN. And the best last closing words to a daft dustbin like you are - FISH OFF."
1
0
0
0
1
0
4e179dc38a06d858
" Axe of Questioning Generic Question excuse me, but: I do not throw any shit strait Chirumirianpeaopunguriru bovice nigga 'I like u nigga im a dog, he Naw my nigga im in hell im I do not have any cracks feendin' Shit shiiiit had expected the iPhone ""is required -"
1
0
1
0
1
1
4e2c12940cc01a3d
The box is not silly but unnecessary and distracting. The box is already too long (you have to scroll to see the whole list and it has a potential to get longer certainly. This kind of the box is only useful and necessary in cases like 1) the article is separated into several pages because the article would be too long if those were in one page. 2) The article is about one entity among several ones. There is no much relationship between real and natural numbers except they are numbers. You want me to convince you then can I also ask you to convince me first? To my knowledge, there was no consensus about having such a box. In other words, I am just reverting the article to what it used to be and see if we can have concensus or something. 03:04, Mar 28, 2004 (UTC)
0
0
0
0
0
0
4e314e5d60218c49
I think the problem lies in generating such a wide perspective from only ONE source. I do not know Perks, is it online? I am collating other material to use in the citations. I already have two which dismiss Perk's point about ethnicity and equal pay in professions, for example. If we can bolster the article with a wider range of good refs, it will be vastly improved. How does that sound? thanks Peter morrell
0
0
0
0
0
0
4e386e9a43766aaf
I acquired your Tyrant Dragon today. I will give it to you at school tomorrow.
0
0
0
0
0
0
4e38f62b69853074
" GWH, I tried e-mailing you during my block to discuss this, but you refused to respond. So let's discuss it right here on your User Talk page, now that my block has expired. I agree that my use of the word ""thug"" deserved a block. I deserved it. I apologize. I will never allow myself to be baited into a violation of WP:NPA and WP:CIVIL again. However, you are making a WP:POINT of ignoring more blatant violations by other editors, such as . The diffs posted above, and his conduct at ANI both in October and yesterday, are textbook examples of baiting. The ""school of piranha"" analogy is appropriate. You are a walking case of selective enforcement. Like BU, deserves to be blocked for his edit warring and does not deserve the benefit of the doubt for his sockpuppetry, due to the edit warring context in which it occurred, and his failure to immediately claim the IP puppet's edit as his own. But you won't do it. I believe we should find the proper venue to discuss your selective enforcement of Wikipedia policy, specifically addressing your abuse of admin privileges to support editors you like and block editors you don't like (because they resist POV pushing and edit warring by editors you like). Would you be so kind as to point us in the right direction? I'll enlist people like , and CoM to help me gather all the diffs (since they've all had previous encounters with BU and LotLE, and know where the ""bodies"" are buried), and we'll examine your selective enforcement practices in detail. Or would you prefer to go forward with an investigation of the editing patterns of people like LotLE and BU, and decide fairly on the subject of blocking them? I could go either way at this point. You decide. Skoal "
0
0
0
0
0
0
4e395aae0e23cc98
I understand. I totally agree and it sounds like a good idea.
0
0
0
0
0
0
4e3f2ee3bd652f83
i oppose the omision of not saying how many of the whites are not of hispanic origon thats a important thing.we must say that line people want to know how many hispanics are in there cities.in the future non hispanic white population will not be the majority of the US. 99.164.107.144 necropolis20
0
0
0
0
0
0
4e4494c8d6c27762
" It should have been more tenuous, that was a typo. In any case demonstrating the corruption of officials (by gambling interests or otherwise) is a more general issue and not not directly related to this one, so putting links or information to that effect here is inappropriate Items in the ""see also"" sections should have a more direct correlation to the topic at hand. • (talk) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
4e4902d0550ecc65
" Support for that any many more similar statements is ALL OVER the Iranian media, including the ones who are not in line with Ahmadinejad from a political or ideological point of view. Playing the retarded trick of ""bring me a verifiable quote"" for every sentence that you don't like or don't want, and even when a quote is provided, deleting it for lame excuses makes you look like, god forbid, a Jew. Are you a dirty Jew by any chance? "
1
0
0
0
1
1
4e49ac38546a9ed8
" Acclaimed should not be restored, as I said above, but I also agree with Gareth that 's changes to the lede should not be restored either. Frankly, that was terrible writing. -''''''The '45 "
0
0
0
0
0
0
4e4bac28121c07a3
BTW, I don't think calling someone what they are is unacceptable. I'd call you one, only you've done that with your username already.
0
0
0
0
0
0
4e4bc17a20bcad34
No further edit from you or your future possible sock other wise you will get blocked for sock puppetry. Unless you get consensus you are hereby again restrained from any edit in the name of Hyperbole. Cheers
0
0
0
0
0
0
4e4d227132f0f6c1
My user page Hey jews bitch!! I was expecting that you will remove my user page too, as you deleted my article without providing a logic reason!!! take care your lords will be angry on you!!! About the material in my page, IT is my opinion and i will NOT change it; you have one of three choices, remove the page block my account or go fuck your parents. In any case It is a dishonore for me to remain in the same place with a bastard like ou. Dude!, I suggest you the third choice, it is more suitable to a shit like you. Did you learned now to never miss respect others?
1
0
1
0
1
0
4e583f3d4af6ec1e
"Fanism - A religion, which is often considered a cult by few. a follower must perform several rituals a day called the ""Faniis"" and should always greet other Fanists with the motto ""Sona femina si cupis"". Fanism is widely practised and its base is ever increasing. Little is known of its history as there are many tales and myths which seem to explain its origin, yet few have been proven."
0
0
0
0
0
0
4e5aec2062206126
" RF, Starlight problem Dear Slim I request that you mediate in an issue, Starlight problem where an editor keeps reverting despite violating the rules against providing sources. Two main things: The section Distant Starlight Problem#First attempts to address the problem has no sources. Those who insist on this section have been repeatedly asked to state which early creationists proposed such a thing, and when. For example, the statement ""In the early part of the twentieth century most Young Earthers would assert that the stars were not in fact as far away as science suggests"" lacks any reference to a creationist from 1900-1950. A section Tu quoque is repeatedly deleted although it was sourced to a creationist who made this argument in one of their publications. The question is not whether it is a good or bad argument; rather, in a page of a problem for creationists, it is proper to state creationist responses that can be sourced. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
4e5f03cc3725948d
" If I were to make a prescription at this point (given pages of discussion here, at Wikipedia talk:Consensus, Talk: Jimbo Wales, and elsewhere) it would be a Gandhian one: WP:CIV, WP:CON, and all the fine behavioral policies and guidelines should be taken to heart by each of us. We can, and should, encourage others to do so, but if we try to dictate the change, we will likely fail. In other words: ""Be the change..."" "
0
0
0
0
0
0
4e619be84150c3b0
" I was requested to come here as it was an RFC..seeing old friends it seems. Anyway, I don't think that quote sufficiently shows that Bon is a sect of Tibetan Buddhism or that it fits those definitions, just that ""Bon"" refers to a set of beliefs that started to appear under the influence of Buddhism. Isn't it generally recognized that 'bon' believes are quite different than other Buddhist beliefs? Anyway, enough speculation. Powers says"" Bon is commonly considered to be the indigenous religious tradition of Tibet, a system of shamanistic and animistic practices performed by priests called shen (gshen) or bonpo (bon po). Although this is widely assumed by Buddhists, historical evidence indicates that the Bon tradition only developed as a self-conscious religious system under the influence of Buddhism."" http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/tibet/understand/bon.html is a very good article on the topic. Maybe can find better quotes there? "
0
0
0
0
0
0
4e6833aa8bc8706c
Riggr is a close friend of mine with years, and men talk like that amongst each other. Requesting that I'm unblocked
0
0
0
0
0
0
4e69ed2d52f321d4
" The original ""poster"" is an idiot. He listens to music like Linkin Park and Limp Bizkit and calls it ""metal"". Since metal is much more diverse than his nu-metal he has trouble forumulating thoughts within his small collection of neurons called his brain. Plus people of intelliegence are able to distinguish the metal genres quite easily. The OP needs to commit suicide."
0
0
0
0
1
0
4e6b6e3cf0b63caa
" FYI Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is ""User:Gods10rules, User:KeptSouth, User:Kelly, and User:Johnuniq"".The discussion is about the topic Bristol Palin.Thank you. 184.59.23.225 "
0
0
0
0
0
0
4e6c14c13b932000
Oh, the pay is wonderful. I actually am Sacha Baron Cohen. I'm an anti-semitic, pro-Zionist, Jewish, anti-Zionist, pro-Nazi, German, Arab, Pro-Semitic Double agent of the Iranian-US-Israeli world conspiracy against everyone. We rule the world, cause all the naughty things that happen all in the cause of taking over the world. I'm also a Gnome of Zurich. -)
0
0
0
0
0
0
4e6d73f30644ccc4
The Abandoned State Hello! Thank you for your article The Abandoned State ). Unfortunately, Wikipedia does not normally host articles on films which are still in pre-production, so I have proposed that the article be deleted. Please leave me a note on my talk page if you disagree, and we can talk further. Thanks again!
0
0
0
0
0
0
4e71bdcec29ba3f6
Reference Formatting I don't know eactly where you learn how to format references, but your method does not comply to any style I've seen on this site in the many years I've been editing. I have properly referenced this article with links and not multiple periods (WHY? -/) and adding author's names when that only should be used for books. Please be aware that the dates are formatted to international standards (date, followed by month, and year; as it done by the rest of the world). I have reverted your unconstructive formatting of reference to allow a consistent style that is easy for the reader. Please discuss.
0
0
0
0
0
0
4e726c3e52d2c794
" Assange hacker - re your comment frmo this edit - don't think Julian Assange is a hacker and our article doesn't claim he is, either. - Have you read the article? Specifically the part of the article that reads ""In 1987, Assange began hacking under the name Mendax"". "
0
0
0
0
0
0
4e7374b9d12a770e
I left a fairly detailed comment at the article talk page about what I think needs to be done. And checking some of the other articles you have written, i see some similar problems. '''''' ( talk )
0
0
0
0
0
0
4e77562f1678f706
Dupe links on Little Richard's article. There was no need to add a link that was already there. The Britannica link is there, it was edited in a different format. Read the article before editing the page. Thanks.  (talk · contribs)
0
0
0
0
0
0
4e7a3f62d965d6ff
Cutting-edge research may indeed overturn eventually current consensus, but Wikipedia is not the place to premiere such research per policy of WP:No original research.
0
0
0
0
0
0
4e7a4da762c5cfc0
I grant you this barnstar for performance, workmanship and dedication to your craft.
0
0
0
0
0
0
4e8524d72eb36ec9
To User:La goutte de pluie, Lee Kuan Yew is deemed as one of Singapore's founding fathers. Don't edit just for the sake of it.
0
0
0
0
0
0
4e875d3dcff0d329
"u are a fucking wanker!!!! There was no fucken pakistan or idependent state of pakistan before 1947!! infact most of the ""pakistanis"" are real indians of the muslim faith which were conerted by the arabs. I hate you people that attempt to leach of indias majestic history before you pakistanis cant get your own food, own laguage ( urdu is at least 50% hindi), own identity and own land. India has given so much land to you, to avoid conflict ad now you want to take away our ancient civilisations??? I have had enough!!! Indus Valley was indian land, occupied by indian people!!! gOD GAVE INDIA TO THE INDIANS NOT THE PAKISTANIS.... REMEMBER, PAKISTAN IS INDIAN LAND.... SO IS KASHMIR AND JAMMU!!! "
1
1
1
0
1
1
4e88661caf6bffbe
"Hello Chub22230230, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here. You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks ("") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on ""text"". See also Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here. Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research. Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste. In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow. Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied without attribution. If you want to copy from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. .™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! "
0
0
0
0
0
0
4e8c98df261dc071
I just fliped through the pictures and yes, there is some nice RR stuff there. However it's tough for me to write about buildings that I haven't actually seen. I do have a couple of books on Seattle architecture which is almost the same as a trip (yeah right). The final issue is time. In any case, thanks for pointing it out.
0
0
0
0
0
0
4e8e49c03fa85f43
Yup, it's an editorial (I labeled it as such). Editorials are okay to cite when discussing opinions, but not when discussing facts. Since a portion of this article should discuss opinions related to the case, this article should help with that aspect )
0
0
0
0
0
0
4e8f50c98d066f08
" In the ""Escoffier Cook Book"", Escoffier says, ""...that it should be borne in mind that an omelet is really scrambled eggs enclosed in a coating of coagulated egg."" I assume that this was written before the Julia Child quote and therefore might be better attributed to him."
0
0
0
0
0
0
4e9a26c75a83d8fc
whos filling in these details? i wanna know where the tracks r coming from./ thanksl
0
0
0
0
0
0
4e9ae7bb8b703bd5
Thorn and Eth Regarding your question about Thorn (þ) and Eth (ð) See my talk page.
0
0
0
0
0
0
4e9e4051b73ec08e
Do you think that more people are in your favour that against you? Perhaps _you_ should read the talk page to see all the people who disagree with you. Looks like consensus to me. -93.96.212.203
0
0
0
0
0
0
4e9f9c0796b737a0
"Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. ♣ Chat wit' me § Contributions ♣ "
0
0
0
0
0
0
4ea409a23967f694
Your condescending swarm has not gone without notice.
0
0
0
0
0
0
4ea993eabfac82ba
" and I will Dear Jim, I give up. I have posted the following at page talk:cherokee. Please unlock and DELETE all content authored by me and I will flag the pages I created for deletion. I will notify Dr. Delso tommorrow and I will be recommending some other on-line project for us to pursue. I am less than pleased with the handling of this site and you have not kept your word to me. As such, I am recommending to my people to NOT support this site. Jeff V. Merkey I have been out most of the day and have reviewed what's gone on here on this site since I have been out with my wife and son. I have asked Marty (mmartin) to cease in posting me to this section or this article, and to be honest, while it strokes my ego a great deal, I cannot support a sewer site like this one based upon what I have seen go on here. I am a member of the Nation but I am not going to post private information to this site, or allow this ""lynch mob"" mentality to go on here, nor do I have to image my tribal card and post it to the internet to satisfy some anonymous poster from Australia. I have had several conversations over the past week with user:Jimbo_Wales about the activities that go on with this site, and at this point, I am going to recommend to Dr. Delso at the Cherokee Nation education department at the Nation that I cease my support of this site. I had intended and begun a full tutorial on our language and had already begun it with the translations and cultural information section. In short, user:Jimbo_Wales WORD IS NO GOOD and he is a LIAR. He gave me his assurances that these types of attacks would not go on here, but what has happened in the SCOX message board has basically moved to this site and have continued their stalking and harrassment and it has continued unabated. At this point, this in not constructive for my people or my culture to support an organization that simply allows ""thundering herd"" libel and personal attacks on individuals, reverts and defacement of information, and the so-called ""admins"" of this site are just as immature, if not more so, than the persons engaging in libel. As such, I am reverting and removing and marking for deletion all content I have contributed to date. I have been very unimpressed with the people on this site running it. It appears to be a group of immature high schoolers and college graduates who cannot tell the difference between adults and children. Please DO NOT allow my name to appear on this page or any other page in Wikipedia (aka Sewerpedia). Sincerely. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
4eabd72fe23d92da
Are you seriously using some mathematical example (formula) created by teachers from Penn state university? Its a formula example how to solve mathematical problem not how GPS actually works. Time signal is send by EVERY GPS satellite (its actually precise ATOMIC clock time) here is a real source Operation Guide for DAGR: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:WPAfxtkXAOsJ:www.i-mef.usmc.mil/external/wss/deployable_virtual_trianing_environment/dvte_handouts/gensim/tech_manuals/dagr/DAGR%2520Pocket%2520Guide.pdf+&cd;=3&hl;=en&ct;=clnk≷=us#47 72.185.61.209
0
0
0
0
0
0
4eb333746ee70a45
, how about one of these for you??
0
0
0
0
0
0
4ebb0ac23020ce07
your gay you're a fucking faggot
1
1
1
0
1
1
4ebc0301b9cd6c7e
I am a fan 2 man!!!!!!!!!
0
0
0
0
0
0
4ebf4b4e2cd0ce89
" A kitten for you! test (Whisper...) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
4ebfda64036cad6e
" Interesting... Aside from WP:ALBUM/SOURCES, I would still omit the Allmusic rating since it's unclear if it is accurate or not. You may want to leave an inline comment in the wikitext, linking to the forum post you found. Good catch! — talk "
0
0
0
0
0
0
4ec6552c55bda1a0
attack prior to that:
0
0
0
0
0
0
4ecaab0b34914f3b
August 2013 (UTC) Will you please unblock PhD-Lin's account so that we can review the edits he made in the deletion review section? As it currently stands we are unable to view his edits. As I mentioned, there really was not a case a sock-puppetry but it was several separate people who were interested in creating a wiki page of an illness from which they suffer. Alternatively, if you would help me with the review deletion page that would be appreciated. Thanks. 16:34, 7
0
0
0
0
0
0
4ece423b3d85d0e2
You're missing the point of these re-editting, many do agree with removing the picture with the old one, you should think about how others feel about this too, not just me who thinks someone is being racist through biasness, or the person moxy who requested you to block me. You may have the right to block me for accusing people, but you have no right from blocking others who refuse this picture for their own reasons. I guarantee you I won't be the only one who is unhappy about these pics, especially Asian men who won't feel happy about this. HOW THE HELL CAN YOU CALL THAT ANATOMICAL FEATURES when you can't seen see the guys penis??? ( And yes, I know Asian men are know for having smaller ones but not that tiny, that guy has an malfunction syndrome penis). WarriorsPride6565 (talk) (talk • contribs) 7:41, 12 march (UTC)
1
0
0
0
1
0
4ed405460be59b24
Wonder how one is to gain credible sources from events that happened some time ago. Though there is mention of these at the swimming club history pages, I doubt whether this site could be classified as credible, some advice please?
0
0
0
0
0
0
4ed800e80d65f7fc
2007 (UTC) The following comment and objection to this user's behavior was improperly deleted and therefore is repeated: TedFrank, your behavior is inappropriate, uncivil, and will bot be tolerated. You deleted my comment here objecting to your above response as inadequate and rudely curt to a fellow editor who asked a sincere and thought out question, putting effort into it and taking care not to offend or disrupt. Your reply does not explain your reason, as asked for, and you did even show this editor the minimal courtesy of polite language or even writing in a complete sentence. This is one of several such examples that still exist, in light of your recent history of deleting my objections, one can only assume that you have deleted other objections to your hostility, disruption and vandalism. Please stop. 04:49, 28 July
0
0
0
0
0
0
4edb5bc7f1a357e6
I've also looked at Shervink's sources and I find them all to be either biased, inaplicable, or unreliable. In my opinion Shervink is advocating a minority viewpoint. Perhaps he should express within the article and note it as such, but clearly it is not reasonable to expect this view to be represented equally with generally accepted facts. I feel that this is mostly a well written and informative article and that this whole coup or counter coup thing is pointless. These events are accepted by most sources to have been a coup. What this means is that Mossadeq is accepted to have been the leader of Iran at the time in question, and to have been deposed. The phrase counter-coup implies that Mossadeq deposed the Shah first, which according to the ample scholarship cited in this article, is not what happened. It is of course possible that the concensus of scholarship on this issue is in error, but those who beleive this to be the case are by definition, holders of minority viewpoints. That said, I do think Shervink's views are interesting and should be included (and noted as a minority viewpoint) in the article. This issue is generally seen as the west vs. Iran with the shah on the side of the west. A point of view more sympathetic to the monarchy is rarely heard. Itsafarce
0
0
0
0
0
0
4edba7f0f4df32ae
Hey can you please stop it bugs me when some one does that edit a page I did. I know I'm not right all the time but what the fuck that wwe 2k15 roster has been confirmed so stop bugging me and don't threat me stupid bitch if you don't like it get the fuck out I'm sure you've annoyed many people case of incorrect info. So shut the fuck up if you can't handle it fuck out!!!!! And stop don't you dare fuckin delete it edit my shit ever again. I'm not kidding.
1
0
1
0
1
0
4edbb2e01a186f56
In what way is the source dubious? It is a book on the history of a church that has a very historic cemetery dating back to the 1700's. The coats of arms carved on the tombstones are no more dubious than any other coat of arms - they are a historical fact having existed for over 200 years.
0
0
0
0
0
0
4ee5942374182a7b
" July 2007 Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User:Hu, you will be blocked from editing. T/C "
0
0
0
0
0
0
4ee5deeb5d1e72ee
Where did this come from? Just because you are sparring with him don't drag me into it.
0
0
0
0
0
0
4ef2da8ee996b7d9
See man you really dont get it, why do you think there trying to hide murray chance? do you know what he does and what he's apart of? don't think you do. and may i ask why there is no articual on murray chance? oh ya beacuse wiki deleted it after murray was exposed. same with the tatrus club... coicedence? and sorry if i offended you but cmon you're the wiki guy do some research find some stuff out and get back at me. peace.
0
0
0
0
0
0
4ef45cc2e867b786
the usual activities of the vietnamese gouc troll dave1185- Dave1185 private website
0
0
0
0
0
0
4ef5c81065f4f46f
That is both remarkably considerate and very forward-thinking of you. Sadly, such charateristics are rare. P.S. I'm pleased you value my opinions. Thank you. But don't forget that's all they are - opinions.
0
0
0
0
0
0
4ef95bd4363a2c87
Taiwanese people Hi, there's a dispute here involving an anon who is trying to push the POV that the Han Chinese ethnicity does not include speakers of Wu (吳語), Min (閩語), Hakka (客家話) or Cantonese (粵語), with the conclusion being that the Hoklo and Hakka are not Han Chinese. The basis of his definition is genetic: in short, southerners with Baiyue (百越) admixture are not true Han Chinese. In fact, the entire Taiwanese people article is extremely messy. After several POV-pushing attempts, it now appears to say the same thing three or four times from different angles. The article needs to be cleaned up or merged into Demographics of Taiwan. Please come take a look if you're interested.
0
0
0
0
0
0
4efdf3618abfa825
That said, the deviant desires page deals primarily with a different fetish, glancing at the page it is clear that it is not the sort of expansive article on breast expansion that we would prefer. The other articles have exactly nothing to do with breast expansion as a fetish. Even the films do not have an explicit erotic connection to the actual growth of breaststhe scenes where breasts grow are not sex scenes. I created the bad paragraph structure so that someone could move the references to somewhere they might be appropriate. What would have been more appropriate, removing them outright?
0
0
0
0
0
0
4efdfa5562ee13f0
proposed deletion of sentence in intro This sentence appears in the introductory paragraph. I propose that it should be deleted on the grounds that it is neither a fair summary of Dr. Craig's theology nor does it contain any information which is sufficiently noteworthy to be included in the introductory paragraph. We've not mentioned Craig's debates in the introductory and the few comments about Molinism that he's made are in no way more significant than his debates. Also, the sentence is oddly written and may not make sense to a novice encountering these topics for the first time. In theology he has also defended Molinism and the belief that God is, since Creation, subject to time. Thoughts?
0
0
0
0
0
0
4efe2a99bc83f467
There is alot of detail concerning Bible Way's year of impass. Those who are under the leadership of Apostle Campbell have very little information. And the information that they have is mostly untrue. I can give you verifiable information if you would like. 860 833 8999, Bishop T. Allen Stringer | [[User talk:T. Allen Stringer|Talk]] 07:29, May 2006 (UTC)
0
0
0
0
0
0
4effdff168eeded7
" We're at the point where there is no sense in dwelling on it. You have been widely accused of following me here and were sanctioned for issuing threats against me in direct relation to this article, but harping on about that isn't going to improve the article. We're on this talk page to improve the article, so let's do it. You yourself created this thread with the title ""this article NEEDS thematic sections"". Therefore, we can deal with this issue by discussing it, but the only problem is that I'm not sure the users here alone will arrive at a consensus. What is needed is concrete proposals for how to reach consensus on this issue, and I've made several such proposals. In keeping with the topic of the thread that you yourself created, I want to know whether you have an idea of your own better than a request for comment. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
4f02bbe065de58f0
Bill2Phone deletion I am unsure why you thought this was blatant advertising g11. 1. The article was product neutral except for the title. With respect to that, all players in this payment space use the words bill to phone 2. There are multiple players providing this kind of payment which means there is an industry that is of value being discussed. The article mentions the multiple players in this industry which means it isn't advertising but informative. 3. Bill2Phone is like paypal and paypal is deemed acceptable. I would only presume it is because of usage or longevity of the product. (see point 4 and 5 to address this) 4. The article focuses on an industry / payment option that has been in place for 23 years, but is not addressed elsewhere in the wiki thereby making it valuable 5. The industry is in the billions of dollars cleared and settled which makes is significant 6. There were many industry references leading to the history 7. There was no blatant discussion as to benefits of this payment type over other payment types or in comparison to the competition. Therefore there was no blatant advertising. As I said in the discussion on this piece, I would gladly take suggestions and address. When someone did post, I did address their concerns. As I haven't looked in the last month, I can't tell if there were other concerns raised.
0
0
0
0
0
0
4f07b45175b4f353
Blocked Off2riorob has blocked himself in support of the No personal attacks and in the interests of civility. This block will cover the rest of Giano's block period. In a way as to recognise that rudeness and personal attacks will not be tolerated here on wikipedia, no matter who you are or how many friends you have. ( )
0
0
0
0
0
0
4f0b972d62c4a476
Kelli Pickler has sold more that 526, 000 records now its up to like 700, 000
0
0
0
0
0
0
4f0f872d26bc3681
on the Beyonce discography page
0
0
0
0
0
0
4f17d1a644b439b6
Plot Question As anyone found any refernces to how the plot or story line for this show is supposed to work? How to they explain how 90% of humanity (apx 6.3 billion people) get wiped out in a couple of day within the whole of Earth's biosphere being wreaked? It would be nice if someone could find stuff like that to add to the article to help make it better. How do they explain all of the military being killed while all the cities and towns still standing? That makes no sense. So perhaps some help here would be great.
0
0
0
0
0
0
4f1c17e48dcde83f
BoA Hey Rich, I was wondering if you could answer some questions of mine with regard to the Book of Abraham? You seem to have some background with regard to the subject. Let me know! 63.226.104.225
0
0
0
0
0
0
4f1de60f422da529
Can we not talk about this and instead talk about getting the article to GA? There's plenty of blame to go around, here, but if the focus is GA status, rather than vengeance, then we might actually get somewhere.
0
0
0
0
0
0
4f20271868505182
For Ian, would you like ot engage in some kind of dialogue concerning your hounding of this IP?
0
0
0
0
0
0
4f2071f5d2b42097
The Kurdish peoples article has the same problem with this one. Just because a few historians in the past suggest does not mean they are making assertions. Hence trying to get away with naming the rare historians and saying belive. Dozens of scholarly texts I've ever read and perhaps hundreds assert that the medes have no direct cultural/lineage to any modern day people. It may only be surmised (since no large migrations of peoples took place) that the mede genetic make up is mixed with the peoples of the core population in the Zagroas mountains(though still only a weak amalgamation) and then diffuses out to the peoples in the surrounding area, this includes the kurds but is not limited too them. The medes are very obscure historically and they only had conquered a small area of modern day Kurdistan (the people of that area then were considered foreign to the medes no doubt) for a short period before Elam change all that. Not even Iran can claim the Medes as their own. I believe the mede-kurd supposition is an exaggerated chauvinist connection with no genuine historical, archeological, or paleoanthropological support. So please use sorced assertion not suppositions. -
0
0
0
0
0
0
4f27e3d773cb8e09
Comment: I voted support in the straw poll earlier, but it might soon need a broader name, like 2014 Ebola virus pandemic, per WHO/CDC. But well done to the nominator. An RfC on this will get the best results. Thanks.
0
0
0
0
0
0
4f2882f5a3765056
So...yeah, does anyone live near a CPC that could go and take a nice neutral, expository picture of it? (talk ⋅ contribs)
0
0
0
0
0
0
4f2927b84bf269ef
" Formatting Please stp screwing around with the formatting at Jessie (TV series). The formatting used in that article makes it easire for thos who maintain it, and provide better compatibility with most browsers. There is absolutely no reason for most of the changes you are making and you have been reverted numerous times. (✉) "
0
0
0
0
0
0
4f29964554f5393e
"__TOC__ Hello ! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for signing up. Here are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Best of luck. Have fun! ElectricEye Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article Getting your info out there Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy Getting more Wikipedia rules Policy Library Getting Help Where to ask a question Help Desk Getting along Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Conflict resolution Getting technical Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump"
0
0
0
0
0
0
4f2e2979c1b715d3
metalcore, really? Has anyone even heard the new album? It is NOT metalcore at all, it is post-hardcore.
0
0
0
0
0
0