tasksource/jigsaw_toxicity · Datasets at Hugging Face

id stringlengths 16 16	comment_text stringlengths 6 5k	toxic int64 0 1	severe_toxic int64 0 1	obscene int64 0 1	insult int64 0 1
618c1425e2ae86b9	" Paul Collister A tag has been placed on Paul Collister, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Being a personal acquaintance doesn't make it a reliable source on Wikipedia. Also please remove any self-promotion mentions as this may you look like a Sockpuppet! Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. "	0	0	0	0
61952da676688960	"==Copyright problems== Hello. Concerning your contribution, FunMobility, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. As a copyright violation, FunMobility appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. FunMobility has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following: If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:FunMobility and send an email with the message to ""permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org"". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions. If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:FunMobility with a link to where we can find that note. If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:FunMobility. However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. "	0	0	0	0
6199af302c33c442	" Don't send e-mails pretending to represent me ever again, Zordrac ""I was going to suggest that you have to change the article, but I see that you already have. This seems to be so that you can push your point of view."" Oh yes. I somehow managed to perpetrate an ""underhanded"" POV assault by rearranging the intro so that the various definitions of the term were all discussed together. Yeah, sure, that's first-class POV-pushing there. God knows you'd never do something as dastardly as refactoring. And by the way, I will thank you not to send e-mail to Daniel Brandt pretending to represent me and asserting that your interpretation of my actions, which I never endorsed no matter how many times you falsely repeated them, is what I meant. "	0	0	0	0
6199f8990c5b52a4	Facing the wall Rumour has it that Johnson played facing the wall with a microphone pointed at it to catch the reverberation. Whether or not that was the real reason, doing so does offer certain acoustic advantages.	0	0	0	0
61a320ab889877c6	" Thank you for the clarification! ) [talk] "	0	0	0	0
61a6a9fc5ccb6d18	And your point of hindering me from editing anything on Wikipedia (due to a user who was being delinquent and a nuisance)? I believe you need to revise on the IR (incident report) he sent to you about me verbally attacking him. He came at me in a verbal aggressive way and tried to play the victim. btw, how does the word 'inferior' an offense? It's not a profane word. Profane words like 'b**, motherer, f* you, ahole, c***ing, bull, d*, and so on are more offending words than what you told me about one word being unacceptable. Please, try to be more specific on what you're talking about, before you bewildered your thoughts.	1	0	0	0
61aa6ba2a2a2ec65	" (Removed a fair bit of uncited information about non-notable people) Honi Soit Page Hi Andjam, In order to ""prove"" who was an editor, all you need are old copies of the newspaper I would imagine, so I can't see how the non citation issue applies here. I added a lot of these in over period because many of them are notables, for example John Paul Byrne is a published playwright, Trish Pender a published poet and author, Gabby Milgate an actor in Muriel's Wedding and a radio breakfast host, Julia Leigh is a prize winning Author, Anthony Sharwood a senior writer for Alpha magazine, Michael Fullilove is Program Director for Global Issues at the Lowy institute and so on. Sould I also suggest that it's also a bit insulting to these people to describe them as ""non notable people"" on the world wide web? Working as an adviser to the Prime Miniter (Michael Fullilove) or appearing on the news singing your hit single (Kylie Burtland) is what I'd call notable. As you'd imagine it will take a bit of time to cite of all these, but I included them because someone pointed out we needed more history. I don't care either way but I did put a bit of work into the research so..."	0	0	0	0
61aeda9d97e37c67	Reasons for deletion of Kieran Morris I see User:The_Rambling_Man The Rambling Man did not respond to your query. According to the deletion log, a page of this name has been deleted twice this yearm so I'll try to explain both cases: The first deletion was due to WP:CSD#A7 Speedy Deletion Criterion #7 - non-notable. All Wikipedia content must be WP:NN notable and WP:V verifiable. This could have been avoided by indicating the grounds for perceived notability of the article subject. The second deletion was due to WP:CSD#G10 Speedy Deletion Criterion 10 - the administrators identified the page to be an Wikipedia:Attack_page attack page. The page has been deleted due to no personal attacks policy. This could have probably been avoided if you followed the guidelines in Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.	0	0	0	0
61b2d7ccce4077b7	Do you have a source to back this up?	0	0	0	0
61b648038ca08e42	Angela Merkel for starters. Quite a number of others (like all your edit warring about Gdansk/Danzig (single example out of many many .	0	0	0	0
61c337f13a021ac4	" As for asking someone to die, only a fucking moron like you would take that to mean ""I'm going to kill you"". Why would I commit a crime over a loser like Wookitty? You gotta be kidding me. Try again with your silly little threats."	1	0	1	0
61cf852646fb1edb	Instead of reverting and crying out loud on this superuser talk page, wouldnt be more progressive to discuss this matters on discussion page of each subject? stop bulling me! 72.185.61.209	0	0	0	0
61d2ca59241c1a4d	Searching such non-convex hull over a finite set of points is a np-complete problem (with combinatorial complexity). On the opposite, finding the convex hull has a MUCH lower complexity in O(n²), where n is the number of points in the set.	0	0	0	0
61d68d276557ae80	Talk:Institute of Chartered Accountants of India	0	0	0	0
61dc61edb0f52ba6	Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Frat daddy. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox.	0	0	0	0
61deb008af212cbf	, or, Why Wikipeda is full of Sycophantic Turds	0	0	0	0
61e644c681999a4b	" In fact, your comment was salutary. ""Weyl quantization"" was the original name of the article, as you see in item 2, above. Since the article dismisses this in favor of the transform, which undergirds the phase space formulation, there is no confusion here. However, the old name is still linked in other articles sending the reader here, presumably to learn about the transform, and thus the phase-space formulation. The reader might end up getting the wrong impression, until this article is read more carefully. I did a secondary sweep of the wikilinks to Weyl quantization and replaced the most dangerously misleading ones. "	0	0	0	0
61e6fc0dc894b009	Good idea to move the page of hatred towards the bot, now when new people come on here to complain they will not realise the extent to which this bot is despised. Well done, between that tactic and Durin, this useless bot has a real future!	0	0	0	0
61ebbc8c12604b47	Here is Bank of America's 2009 Annual Report go to page 64 and it shows the calculation of Tier 1 Common capital and total capital. http://media.corporate-ir.net/media_files/irol/71/71595/reports/2009_AR.pdf That number is divided by Risk Adjusted Assets. Which is what I did.	0	0	0	0
61ff36165d88ff45	This is my account and not a puppet one. Please unblock me.	0	0	0	0
62008cf562bfc33d	"s healthcare"") does not necessarily indicate a pro-choice position. However, she has not explained anywhere why she thinks that another RCOG position (i.e. opposing reduction of abortion time limits) is not a pro-choice position. I will edit the present article to focus on the latter position. Opposition to reducing abortion time limits is obviously a pro-choice position, and there is no reason for everyone to spend their weekends arguing about this idea. Far from denying this idea, another editor (KillerChihua) is the one who suggested that this might be an appropriate description. Anyway, check out the new edits that I am about to make. And please respond here rather than at some other talk page. Wikipedia has a policy to explain your reverts, and I would think that this is the best place to do so. Thank you. "	0	0	0	0
6201e1a72c149b42	Durova you're a faggot. stop being obsessed with JoA	1	1	0	0
6208592f598bbf42	" @Drmies: First of all I want to appoligy for my too hasty re-inclusion of the content into the article, which I by the way only did because of the presumption of having satisfied all fellow editors call for adding a direct reference for the ""Reference values in the table"", which previously indeed lacked a reference. In the back-mirror, I was a little too hasty to re-instate and should of course instead first have uploaded the content to my sandbox, and then asked for the talkpage approval before uploading it again. Please however consider, that all my actions were only excecuted in good faith. Subsequently I was surprised to find a continued resistance about the content from fellow editors here at the talkpage. Based on those grounds, I of course accept your removal of the content from the article, and have just created a for the subsequent debate we shall now still continue to have, about the appropriateness (which I still claim) to include a monthly data table in the article. In regards of your claim that my most recent version of the uploaded disputed material is still WP:OR, I will request you to return with a reply why you think this is so, and what we in your opinion need to do in order for the content to satisfy the policy. As far as I know, we are allowed at Wikipedia to create our own wikitables to display fully referenced data, which it indeed was in my latest version of the data table. I admit at first to have uploaded unsourced ""Monthly reference value data"" that strived against WP:OR, which was something I only did as part of a process, in the hope for other editors (or myself) at a later stage being able to find direct sources for those values. Yesterday, I indeed managed to find a direct source for these monthly values published by the Polish Ministry of Finance. Please take into consideration, that we do not have 2 equal WP:PS for the same data but only have 1 (The Polish source), as I have managed to proof here at the talkpage that the Latvian source do not qualify for the purpose, as it did not strictly follow the published official ""ECB evaluation method"" (which it by the way funny enough also never claimed it did) - but instead has adopted its own data approach. Please also consider, that my uploaded data table with monthly data in principle can stand alone, even without that we mention the debated report by the ""Latvian Central Bank"", as I have prooved here at the talkpage they utilised another data approach than the official ""ECB method"". After I now have ellaborated on the details, do you then have a different opinion whether or not my most recent version of the uploaded material still shall be classified as WP:OR? The reason why I think it is so important that we in the Latvian article display monthly convergence values for each month for the past year, and why inclusion of this material shall not be disquallified as per WP:NOTSTATS, is because the uploaded monthly data (for the most recent 12 months) reflect how the official ""ECB method"" works, as a graphical illustration which help casual readers to grasp that all candidate countrys have been granted the right by EU to apply ECB for conducting a monthly convergence check at each month during the year (if they belief to have met all criteria). Unfortunately ECB do not automatically publish monthly convergency reports during the year (because in that case we would obviously have used their direct data for the table instead). But as I already provided evidense for, the Polish Ministry are publishing monthly reports where they check for monthly convergence and calculate the ECB reference value limits based on the official ""ECB method"" (which proofs this is notable stuff), and their findings in the Polish context has also been covered over at the Polish wikipedia (although by a much lower quality than my attempt). Taking this into consideration, will you then still argue it is inappropriate we do the same here at the English wikipedia for the Latvian article (in the version showcased by my )? Personal reply to TDL (not related to the article itself) @TDL: In the past four months there have now been a few times, where you and I clashed about the WP:OR policy. In those cases where we have clashed, I admit to have applied a backwords approach, where I started out to state the facts as I knew it was the WP:TRUTH. I have always seen such uploads as part of a process, where we were continously working to find sources and improve the articles. So my uploads were not ment to be unsourced forever, but something where it could be possible for me (or another editor) at a later stage to return and add the needed	0	0	0	0
6209d04454042b8d	" Ron, You are incorrect in theory that explaining the Shotokan/Karate relevance of common terms constitutes ""dictionary definitions"". Rather, what is there already, below what I am trying to add, are the dictionary definitions. However, I cannot stick to adding to the table because the entries on which I have knowledge are linked well enough. I only wish that you would add some Karate explanation for osu and some of the unlinked terms by adding that table column or using a footnote or two if there are only a couple of unlinked terms, and not be so terse. I've rebutted your ""pov"" argument by pointing out that I am adding no pov; everything is fact, as originally supplied by you yourself and Matt. You are just repeating yourself, I'm afraid, and you do not have a valid rebuttal to my point that clarifying notes, containing facts only, are useful in an encyclopedia. Matt, I am not putting any myth in the article; I am only putting debunking of it. There is a lot of hearsay about Karate, and it's important to put in what is not true, or someone else may come along with a feeling of certainty, and change it again. A note preempts this. This is a good point, so I'll put it in ""full caps"" (I do not intend to ""shout"", please understand, but it's a good idea to catch the eye with this:) THERE IS A LOT OF HEARSAY ABOUT KARATE, AND IT'S IMPORTANT TO PUT IN WHAT IS NOT TRUE, OR SOMEONE ELSE MAY COME ALONG WITH A FEELING OF CERTAINTY, AND CHANGE IT AGAIN. A NOTE PREEMPTS THIS. Best regards, "	0	0	0	0
620bdd3b53d3fcb0	Early in the shows history he was an exterminator but in the subtext it is clear he is a drug dealer - If you are not a fan of the show this would not be apparent so why don't fussy admin research but they just go around editing things.	0	0	0	0
62167cb3d3b82f15	Mediation didn't work the last time. The mediators gave up. Can't say I blame them after getting this treatment I suggest the Personal Rapid Transit page be given special consideration given the controversy. Find some real transportation engineers and transit organizations and get their definition of PRT.	0	0	0	0
62201dfbb3337c5e	" Well, as you can see through out the article igloo is used instead of Igloo, so I decided to lowercase it. talk? "	0	0	0	0
622611af0b75d579	" Gates/Slim I've replied to your note at Talk:Forbes list of billionaires and reverted your edits at Gates and Slim. Can we discuss your changes there before you make any other changes to biographies? Thanks! (talk) "	0	0	0	0
622a6fc041d15d6b	I see 2008 now seems to be 2000 - maybe i misread it. Somebody tried to put it back in. Their link is NOT our site nor is it affiliated with our site. If you click on the author it is a mailto “[email protected]” who has no knwon association to blueprint.	0	0	0	0
622b9e862d12e79a	Geniac is an assole and a mom fuker..	1	0	1	1
62377f68b606e1da	My reply, posted on the Clark peer review page: I think it is a good article. I'd never heard of the gentleman, but I did see the Veronica Mars episode cited, so it turns out I am familiar with him. While I think it is good, you will have problems getting it through FAC on the grounds some people think it is too short. Never mind that a nineteen year old isn't going to have a huge article, people will say it is too shorttrust me, I've heard this objection on my own articles, e.g. Julia Stiles and John Henninger Reagan. FAC commentators will also seize upon the photographs problem, which I don't see ought to be an impediment to getting FA status, but people will object. Now, as to the article itself . . . What happened to his father? Divorce? Something ought to be said because it looks odd mentioning only a mother. Second, I wonder if you could find some print articles about him? You might try accessing databases such as ProQuest or Ebsco through the public library. I'm hesistant about articles where all the sources are electronic. While I've used many links on articles such as Tom Brinkman and Paul Hackett, I also cited the print version so when the operators of those sites take down the electronic versions people will still be able to find the material. Third, I'd eliminate some of the red-links to movies and schools. Again, this will raise objections if you take it to FAC. Finally, most of the article is dedicated to his roles. Is there any more you could add about his personal life. Does he have any charities or causes? 14:44, August 6, 2005 (UTC)	0	0	0	0
623d90a3fbb814a8	" ""RMS"" or ""SS""? The article seems confused about which designation that Arundel Castle should have, as it uses both, and most likely, only one is correct. I did some digging around online, and came up empty on which is right. Help? (Talk) "	0	0	0	0
623f46ce82909ab3	I agree, as much as humanly possible, to avoid my role in the edit warring. Candidly, your answer to my question was a bit fuzzy, but I get your point that what qualifies as a 'revert' (any number) or as edit warring is in the judgment of the beholder. So yes, I agree to be extremely cautious about the gray line between good faith editing and reverts/edit warring. Unfortunately with articles that involve a high degree of emotions, like those associated with gun politics, tempers rise, and Yaf in the past has called my good faith edits to be reverts, and when I try to take it to the talk page, then stonewalling the talk page. I have tried WP:DR in the past with Yaf, and it failed. Check my edit history, I believe you would agree that I have in the past and will continue in the future to exceedingly patient and remained civil in difficult editing environments.	0	0	0	0
62427b6329ed673b	" In his letter of resignation, Sanger didn't call himself cofounder, but ""Ex-chief organizer, Wikipedia"". Could this be a compromise position? Talk\| "	0	0	0	0
6243cbbe9c105c5f	That doesn't give you the right to speedy it. william conoley edits. here 0-@	0	0	0	0
6245c38b9d905fd8	I am refering to this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Metric_UK_road_sign.tif	0	0	0	0
6247b88c95fadb83	History of Latinos and Hispanics Please consider contributing to the article entitled History of Latinos and Hispanics. Thank you! 1m	0	0	0	0
6252c80690bf2259	stop what?! How is it spam to post information relevant to an article and post a link in the talk page, as you suggested, which is also relevant to the article? I see links in Wikipedia articles all the time, but they don't get deleted neurotically.	0	0	0	0
625f44fd7303a176	This page claims that the mean temp of earth is 287 K, yet the highest is 331 k, the lowest 184 K, and (331+184)/2= 257 K! Is this a mistake?	0	0	0	0
625fed37ed740b93	" Man please... what persissting edit warrings? I only add a native name! at section ""native name"". But operator Romanian adijapan dont want to accept these!! ( ) "	0	0	0	0
6264b25054c6ce63	I think me and Justin are going to try and get it back up to scratch. I'll go through the old version and salvage things from that and trawl the net. Though I am somewhat limited to English sources (Well, and French) as my Bulgarian is a little rusty and incredibly non-existant. Thanks for the help.	0	0	0	0
6271aa4298dfb013	Real-world examples If I come across any good analogs in the real world I'll be sure to add them, but I'll also be looking out for more experiments in economics not listed on Wikipedia yet - there don't seem to be nearly enough interesting experiments from such a rich field. Anyway, thanks for your additions; they were in line with what I was planning to do. I think one thing you have to be careful of in Wikipedia is that a claim is totally unsalvage-able before deleting it (some editors NEVER delete any claim from another user, even then). One reason is that many Wikipedians love fact s more than their own children, and take an accusation of factual error more seriously than aspersions against their parentage. (Hopefully I don't have as much of a problem as that but its all an interesting experiment in group dynamics.) Good luck, . 09:16, 2005 May 18 (UTC)	0	0	0	0
6277245011091b6e	" Peter Burwash This article is meets WP:Notability because he is a former professional tennis player, which the information is scant about him online, but here is the links that I compiled. You can use these to make the article better if you would like... [] [] [] [] Thanks, DOGTN "	0	0	0	0
62778b53f706339d	"{\| style=""background-color:#F5FFFA; padding:0;"" cellpadding=""0"" \|class=""MainPageBG"" style=""border:1px solid lightgrey; background-color:lightgrey; vertical-align:top; color:#000000; font-size:85%""\| Hello, Dancingurl26! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes ""~~~~""; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being ""adopted"" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! {\| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:white;"" \|class=""MainPageBG"" style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid white; background-color:lightgrey; vertical-align:top""\| Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability \|class=""MainPageBG"" style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid lightgrey; background-color:Seashell; vertical-align:top""\| {\| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""0"" cellspacing=""5"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:Seashell"" ! The Community \|- \|style=""color:#000""\| [	0	0	0	0
627d26779da864b3	" Dennis Brown, nothing you've listed against me is new from the previous block on my edits on Coal, when I was a far younger, less seasoned editor. In any event ""Coal"" is just a hobby and many of my edits ultimately stayed there. I can see now that I was overzealous in my youth in accusing my opponents of being Coal industry lobbyists (although I wasn't actually serious in saying that). But I fail to see how any of your comments justify a block since none of the actions you've cited are new since my previous block. What you're proposing is essentially double-jeopardy, trying me twice for the same crime which I've already paid the penalty for. Also I was only blocked twice previously. Why does everyone keep saying this is my 4th block when the pages you link to clearly show it is only my 3rd? Why am I being so harshly punished for these good-faith, rookie mistakes? I am but a young, blooming flower who only wishes to blossom, and to let Wikipedia sing its siren song of Truth and Knowledge. "	0	0	0	0
627d97137c61ed79	That CFD == My comment was my vote, I'm ambivilant. ==	0	0	0	0
62822cad6b3ab620	i need help Hi,Nihiltres, I noticed you at the adoption thing. And i kind of need mentoring.So,would you help me please?	0	0	0	0
628627e304afc141	" Source? — (talk2me) Born This Way Sales Gaga confirm that BTW sales are more than 5 million not 2 (http://twitter.com/#!/ladygaga/status/83643608376418304) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.250.192.85 Not a reliable source. — (talk2me) "	0	0	0	0
628b5def928a256b	" Thanks, I share your concerns about discouraging users. I don't know if I posted anything inflammatory, but I certainly did get visibly pissed about having to be subjected to a barrage of anti-Semitism, and then to get criticized and even attacked (""shut the hell up!"") for reporting it. In any case, it won't be discouraging meas I noted above, first thing on TO DO list after the block is over is to report the nasty, gratuitous anti-Semitic attack by above. Hey who knowsmaybe someone will even do it on my behalf in the interim. "	0	0	0	0
628cc689644205c5	" You're not very good at this whole ""oppression"" thing, are you? - 79.180.28.213 "	0	0	0	0
6290e9d1b9a207b4	Many thanks for warring but it is Wikipadida who is making Vandalism and posting the lies and unsupported quotation If Wikipadia want to threat somebody, this is not only Vandalism, that is called differently, but in Syria, we are free and honest	0	0	0	0
6296d1394e8fd738	" It's wikipedia policy. It's not my idea. Read the very page you suggested should be the rule. Five years' precedence is meaningless if it is wrong. Nor was this a cut and paste move, the ""Fraternity (disambiguation)"" page already existed, probably from people having gone through all this before. If this was organized they way these things already have been worked out, we wouldn't need to reinvent the wheel. If you have issues with it, Go to the Disambiguation talk page and bother them, not me.129.133.124.199 "	0	0	0	0
6298f315bba92a73	Sock puppet Sorry to bother you, but an obvious sock (Special:Contributions/76.232.253.147) currently performing mass deletions on Genocides in history.	0	0	0	0
6299d232254101ef	" Maybe as a bootleg it was ""Last flowers to the hospital"" as a work in progress, but the official release is just ""Last flowers"" full stop. 67.5.157.118 "	0	0	0	0
629b43f0b13d065a	Orphaned non-free image File:Star warriors.jpg Hi, Skier Dude. I put the image in the proper section in the Star Wars RPG article (since it is a spinoff it should be in the spinoffs section...). I guess that now the orphaned image banner can be removed. Do you agree?	0	0	0	0
629b7e5da8d2f568	The Godfray and Turner references say that the Moon's annual path around the Sun is concave. Other reference like this one say that it's convex. That seems like a conflict to me. Now, maybe you'll claim that the Godfray and Turner references are looking outward from the POV of the Sun, and the other references are looking inward at the entire system, and that explains the difference. But I still don't acknowledge a distinction between convex/concave when looking outward from the inside, and convex/concave when looking inward at the entire system. Hopefully Marc will clear up some of that when he responds to my question above. -	0	0	0	0
629da30601e30266	Cement trucks Hi, I wonder if someone could answer a couple of trivia questions: 1) Is there something preventing concrete from hardening in those rotating cement mixer trucks, or are they just hoping that they'll get to their destination in time? 2) What happens if it does harden in there? Do they just discard the barrel, or is there some way to deconstruct it and get it off the concrete plug? Thanks!	0	0	0	0
62a07d9df829a329	Agreed, this article needs a popular culture section precisely because of the reason you stated. Thanks for the clean up and other stuff. - (talk \| contribs)	0	0	0	0
62a0db0ae7104cdf	"Oh, and for the record – it's ""whose."" "	0	0	0	0
62a389b35f685554	"==Why?== 35 pages link here. saith the Prime ♥ 07:22, 1 Aug 2008 (UTC) "	0	0	0	0
62a49951cdf2b7fb	" Help me! Please help me with create a reference list. I have a list of references (9) but do not know how to present them in a ""reflist"" "	0	0	0	0
62b5cab89a41420c	" There you go Again Cut it out, ""pops"". Quit trying to force people's hands, it won't work for you. "	0	0	0	0
62b7ae0d7e5f95c0	i have 2 replies on this subject 1, I do believe that on talk pages slight points of view are allowed if that is incorrect please notify me of this, and 2 most of my talks have been around the same time i was playing MMORPGs and on chat sites and perhaps my behaviour their leaked over.	0	0	0	0
62c088a91cb457d6	" The Protocols isn't a ""conspiracy theory"" it is a false document intended to support certain conspiracy theories which predated its own authoring. It is mentioned under false document, but of course should also be mentioned here. There are whole categories of antisemitic conspiracy theories which should be discussed in this article; however, when I was working out the ""Subjects of conspiracy theory"" section, I didn't have the stomach to address them. I still don't. I would overall be more interested in this article as a discussion of the structure and function of conspiracy theories what they mean to people, what broad categories they cover, and how they interact with mainstream history than as another ""List of"" page. I hate ""List of"" pages. But that's probably just me. "	0	0	0	0
62d06ef532d0df4e	You have neither, so stop pushing that change.-	0	0	0	0
62d1d2c9089ff900	Dear Mr Warrior cyber bullying is not funny. I am sorry if I have hurt your feelings over the years.	0	0	0	0
62d3f4be636da324	" ""gold"" release? This is used almost never now. If someone can back up the claim that's it's used frequently, then specify this here, otherwise someone will have to change it. (By backing it up I mean a notable computer software company). "	0	0	0	0
62db72535644c6c9	Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!We hope you like the place and decide to stay. Thank you for your contributions as we've noticed that you've been making some great additions to the Wikipedia at the Lhasa Apso article and we really appreciate it. I'm sorry but I slightly changed the contribution you made about feeding because it included a link to a commercial site (Royal Canin). I have also inserted a note that a reference is needed for the information you've included. You can see the changes I made at the article here. If you have any questions or concerns about this, please let me know. Why not create an account and stay awhile? The Wikipedia can use as many quality members as possible. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Introduction to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia Editing tutorial How to edit a page Manual of style The basics of Wikicode How to develop an article How to create an article Help pages What Wikipedia is not Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your post. If you need any help at all, you can contact me on my talk page or why not pop over to the Teahouse where there are always very patient, helpful and experienced editors available to give you a hand.	0	0	0	0
62dcb6003bd3ccd6	Attack in NJ FYI NBC report.	0	0	0	0
62e736877c28bf05	fuck you Wanker	1	1	1	1
62e93d5ab7fb146f	Thanks! But i know the rules i gonna tell you the same way i told other. DO NOT LEAVE ME MESSAGES. THEY WILL BE DELETED OR INNORED. i upload Image:394589.jpg. as a album cover. do not worry about how it was upload and do not snoop in my business. soccermeko	0	0	0	0
62eb0e271697b26d	Why? Since a separate person readded it & I stated that it should be part of WP proper, I don't know why you'd move it to your own userspace. Do you intend to clean the list up & then readd it?	0	0	0	0
62f3eae85974f364	stop pretending Stop pretending to be cool. I don't really care what you do. Go ahead and ban me, I can change my IP in less than 5 seconds or I can use 1 of the thousands of spoofs, vpns, etc, etc. I don't even have to close my browser to do it. You should also know that even if you vandalize my IP user page, I'm still not going to read your reply. Do yourself a favor and go fuck your wife before somebody else does. 1, 2, 3, 4. Let's have an edit war.	1	0	1	0
62fb344bc50b283f	Does Conner the Prince of Asia? Conner, prince of Asia	0	0	0	0
62fdc765f36474e5	Isn't that your goal? ~SLURP~ I'll still find you after being banned.	1	0	0	0
62ff3d319aa97d28	Looks like more hate toward anarchocapitalism from those who want there to be a government. Can't you people stop trying to marginalize it? Are you scared that people will throw off the shackles of government? -	0	0	0	0
63027edf4d03747f	" Question... ...where, and when did the ""NERF Wars"" get their names? PLZ reply on my Talk page. 76.95.66.209 "	0	0	0	0
6302d847be4b11a1	Myth of the Southern Strategy It's clear you are biased in your editing of the Southern Strategy article. Between you and two other clearly biased editors I guess you have done a good job of keeping meaningful discussion at bay. Good job!129.59.79.123	0	0	0	0
630ce380191145ed	the biggest nob'''Italic text	0	0	0	0
630d994f72d6aee5	" Wow... are we all supposed to have total trust in some ""alleged verbal"" confession??? because the police stuffed-up their investigations - lack of scientific forensic evidence, missing pieces of vital evidence and all those inconsistencies in eyewitnesses evidence? Do we just go ahead and execute people based on ""alleged verbals""??? And please explain Purrums, why Grindlay didn't go directly to the authorities to make an official report of Ryan's ""alleged verbal"" confession? After all, Grindlay was the top-notch man at Pentridge and he surely would called a special meeting to report and discuss such an amazing verbal confession to inform government leaders, prison authorities, televison, radio and other media journalists from around Australia, prosecutors and defence laywers, Father Brosnan and et al. Why would Ryan confess to Grindlay while at the eleventh-hour Ryan wrote letters to various people protesting his innocence? Ryan had to write his letters on toilet paper and then he was also refused his right to make a ""last statement"" just prior to execution. Smells fishy to me! The various documentary films, based on meticulous research including archival material and interviews by living people (including Grindlay) who were directly involved in the Ryan case do not even mention such a confession taking place - because it didn't happen! Professional film-makers know better than to make false allegations, which can result in being sued for compensation of millions of dollars. Documentary films are based on facts and truth. When will Purrums provide ""proof"" that Ryan fired a shot??????????? 60.224.64.166 "	0	0	0	0
631421202b72739d	" Modern mainstream economics The modern mainstream economics section repeats itself a lot. It opens with ""Mainstream economics begins with the premise that resources are scarce and that it is necessary to choose between competing alternatives."" this is a reiteration of something found in the opening of the article - ""the science which studies human behaviour as a relationship between ends and scarce means which have alternative uses."" Someone must really like repeating that though because later on in this section we see ""Economics studies how individuals and societies seek to satisfy needs and wants through incentives, choices, and allocation of scarce resources."" Then later in this section we see ""neoclassical economics, which began to develop in the late 1800s and models choices made in the allocation of scarce resources."" Then later in this section ""It is sometimes referred to as the study of choice under conditions of scarcity."" Then later in this section ""Economics is a broad term given to the social science of how choices are made in face of limited resources."" Then later in this section a word for word repetition of what was said in the opening - ""the science which studies human behavior as a relationship between given ends and scarce means which have alternative uses"" Reading all of this I conclude that mainstream economics studies the relationship between given ends and scarce means which have alternative uses. But I do not need to be told this six times (seven, if you count the opening). This section also repeats itself in other ways. I am removing redundancy from it. "	0	0	0	0
631cb43f93f16031	" Note: While undue weight is a legitimate concern, notability is not a limitation on the content of an article, only on the subject of article. If something related to an individual is reported on in reliable secondary sources, you can be relatively certain it is of sufficient relevance to the individual to merit mention., article length permittingSkomorokh "	0	0	0	0
6322f356f9686809	" Ban of ""Bryansee"" from Wikipediocracy. Hey, you are Zoloft. The one who banned me from Wikipediocracy with a threat that I die. ""Well"" means dead. ""Recover"" means ""die"". You are wanting me to die by a medication increase or meet my maker. Check this out: 103.244.189.136 "	1	0	0	0
6322f5e07686440d	" Social Credit I am curious to know how this change ""corrects a misleading statement""? Social Credit never won a federal seat in English Canada again, as far as I know. \| t "	0	0	0	0
6328d77f65348fe1	INPORTANT You Know What I Dont Have To Listen To You I Worked Hard And My Creative Skills Are GOOD ! ElvisPresley1	0	0	0	0
63328f41777f21a5	Please, explain what means: Hellenized origin. Hellenisation is a process but not origin.	0	0	0	0
6333f15af5ffe690	Removal of comments and Afd from a banned user I was wondering the same thing. It would make sense that you should be able to go in and close all of them out, however I haven't been around long enough to know for sure. I am also hesitant to try to do one or two of them because he appears to have some sort of connection with somebody else on here. There is another editor that was following him around, backing everything he did. When he was getting locked out, this user was even going to his talk page trying to defend him with basically the same arguments that he was using. I'm fairly certain there is a connection between the two, whether this guy has multiple accounts, or its a friend or family member, I don't know. I just picked up on a very odd connection between them. This person is still going after my articles and posting bogus reasons to delete sections of them. Until we can be certain we can do it, I'm not going to risk it because I'm sure his other account/partner will immediately report us if we do.	0	0	0	0
63431c2fdb752b5a	Hello Mr Friendly Here is the article you cannot delete: I wanted to ask you to block me permanently from Wikipedia, but then I realized you cannot do that. What a pity. That is what I want. Unfortunately you cannot do that.	0	0	0	0
634ad7183ec9d16b	... ahhh, the editorial douchery!)	0	0	0	0
634b5f5707148c18	" Hard to get kids to give up their hobby horse. I am too new to Wikipedia to have a clue as to what one can do about a situation like this. I see the need to cover the various theories because were it not for her disappearance and the various conspiracy theories that grew up over the years Earhart would be little known today. What is amusing is that such theories took 20 years to emerge. Aviators of that time had a pretty good idea what could go wrong. I see there is a lock-down about 'disputes"". I feel the facts of the matter speak for themselves, but those who wish the Electra to have unlimited range, and the ability to carry more weight than it did will never be dissuaded by facts. "	0	0	0	0
635361a46f7f2de8	" Welcome to Deletionist Wikipedia. I'll be your [username deleted] Mate1 "	0	0	0	0
635693ff20cf7004	" I should also point out that the lack of censorship of Monsanto under WP:BLP is an omission, not a logical necessity. The doctrine of corporate personhood does prevail legally; you can be sued for libeling a corporation. There's absolutely no reason that the BLP fanatics don't attack that article and excise all the most notable and widely-documented allegations calling it a ""WP:Attack page"" and so on, except that they must still worry that people would rebel. But they purge more inclusionists from the site every day - sooner or later, it is inevitable that they will do so unless stopped. "	0	0	0	0
63572c197ea75e7a	Two problems with this article And these they are: The definition has a link to ill-conditioned that redirects to this article. So there is a need to explain what well-conditioned and ill-conditioned are and to remove this link. The definition writes about problem's amenability to digital computation. However, in the section for condition number of a matrix it is mentioned that conditioning is a property of the matrix and not of floating point arithmetics or rounding off errors.	0	0	0	0
635765b4a8650e06	. I'd appreciate your further input	0	0	0	0
63585b309c5320f8	Alfred Tinnenbaum Hi-Please look at the article about Alfred Tinnenbaum. Why do I think this is a hoax done by some college student? Nothing came up on Alfred Tinnenbaum on Google. I had been working on the Iowa Territory article and I would had come across this. I hope you are doing well-	0	0	0	0
635d1773e0504838	" There were several issues with your edit 1) content must be attributed to a reliable source and not just your personal commentary see also WP:CITE 2) the use of gratuitous hyperbole and random praise such as ""megahit"" are not suitable for an encyclopedia. Active (bananaphone "	0	0	0	0
636365babb46dab8	reason to be unblocked here}}	0	0	0	0
6364b4647e74dae2	Don't you wikipedians have an ignore policy for trolls? ) Thanks for feeding, he he. Well, you have a LUCID troll around. Thanks for giving me material for a diss. 94.254.193.66	0	0	0	0
636dc7bffa8bc5a8	"== A == I'm pretty certain that the band A provided at least some of the fictional group's songs. The song ""Bad Mistake"" from How Ace Are Buildings was definitely in the show. "	0	0	0	0
636ece8e30aefca6	Clean up? Yeah, I noticed that remark. I think that it is spam.	0	0	0	0

618c1425e2ae86b9

" Paul Collister A tag has been placed on Paul Collister, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Being a personal acquaintance doesn't make it a reliable source on Wikipedia. Also please remove any self-promotion mentions as this may you look like a Sockpuppet! Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. "

0

61952da676688960

"==Copyright problems== Hello. Concerning your contribution, FunMobility, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. As a copyright violation, FunMobility appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. FunMobility has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following: If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:FunMobility and send an email with the message to ""permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org"". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions. If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:FunMobility with a link to where we can find that note. If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:FunMobility. However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. "

0

6199af302c33c442

" Don't send e-mails pretending to represent me ever again, Zordrac ""I was going to suggest that you have to change the article, but I see that you already have. This seems to be so that you can push your point of view."" Oh yes. I somehow managed to perpetrate an ""underhanded"" POV assault by rearranging the intro so that the various definitions of the term were all discussed together. Yeah, sure, that's first-class POV-pushing there. God knows you'd never do something as dastardly as refactoring. And by the way, I will thank you not to send e-mail to Daniel Brandt pretending to represent me and asserting that your interpretation of my actions, which I never endorsed no matter how many times you falsely repeated them, is what I meant. "

0

6199f8990c5b52a4

Facing the wall Rumour has it that Johnson played facing the wall with a microphone pointed at it to catch the reverberation. Whether or not that was the real reason, doing so does offer certain acoustic advantages.

0

61a320ab889877c6

" Thank you for the clarification! ) [talk] "

0

61a6a9fc5ccb6d18

And your point of hindering me from editing anything on Wikipedia (due to a user who was being delinquent and a nuisance)? I believe you need to revise on the IR (incident report) he sent to you about me verbally attacking him. He came at me in a verbal aggressive way and tried to play the victim. btw, how does the word 'inferior' an offense? It's not a profane word. Profane words like 'b****, mother****er, f*** you, a**hole, c*******ing, bull****, d***, and so on are more offending words than what you told me about one word being unacceptable. Please, try to be more specific on what you're talking about, before you bewildered your thoughts.

1

0

61aa6ba2a2a2ec65

" (Removed a fair bit of uncited information about non-notable people) Honi Soit Page Hi Andjam, In order to ""prove"" who was an editor, all you need are old copies of the newspaper I would imagine, so I can't see how the non citation issue applies here. I added a lot of these in over period because many of them are notables, for example John Paul Byrne is a published playwright, Trish Pender a published poet and author, Gabby Milgate an actor in Muriel's Wedding and a radio breakfast host, Julia Leigh is a prize winning Author, Anthony Sharwood a senior writer for Alpha magazine, Michael Fullilove is Program Director for Global Issues at the Lowy institute and so on. Sould I also suggest that it's also a bit insulting to these people to describe them as ""non notable people"" on the world wide web? Working as an adviser to the Prime Miniter (Michael Fullilove) or appearing on the news singing your hit single (Kylie Burtland) is what I'd call notable. As you'd imagine it will take a bit of time to cite of all these, but I included them because someone pointed out we needed more history. I don't care either way but I did put a bit of work into the research so..."

0

61aeda9d97e37c67

Reasons for deletion of Kieran Morris I see User:The_Rambling_Man The Rambling Man did not respond to your query. According to the deletion log, a page of this name has been deleted twice this yearm so I'll try to explain both cases: The first deletion was due to WP:CSD#A7 Speedy Deletion Criterion #7 - non-notable. All Wikipedia content must be WP:NN notable and WP:V verifiable. This could have been avoided by indicating the grounds for perceived notability of the article subject. The second deletion was due to WP:CSD#G10 Speedy Deletion Criterion 10 - the administrators identified the page to be an Wikipedia:Attack_page attack page. The page has been deleted due to no personal attacks policy. This could have probably been avoided if you followed the guidelines in Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.

0

61b2d7ccce4077b7

Do you have a source to back this up?

0

61b648038ca08e42

Angela Merkel for starters. Quite a number of others (like all your edit warring about Gdansk/Danzig (single example out of many many .

0

61c337f13a021ac4

" As for asking someone to die, only a fucking moron like you would take that to mean ""I'm going to kill you"". Why would I commit a crime over a loser like Wookitty? You gotta be kidding me. Try again with your silly little threats."

1

0

1

0

61cf852646fb1edb

Instead of reverting and crying out loud on this superuser talk page, wouldnt be more progressive to discuss this matters on discussion page of each subject? stop bulling me! 72.185.61.209

0

61d2ca59241c1a4d

Searching such non-convex hull over a finite set of points is a np-complete problem (with combinatorial complexity). On the opposite, finding the convex hull has a MUCH lower complexity in O(n²), where n is the number of points in the set.

0

61d68d276557ae80

Talk:Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

0

61dc61edb0f52ba6

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Frat daddy. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox.

0

61deb008af212cbf

, or, Why Wikipeda is full of Sycophantic Turds

0

61e644c681999a4b

" In fact, your comment was salutary. ""Weyl quantization"" was the original name of the article, as you see in item 2, above. Since the article dismisses this in favor of the transform, which undergirds the phase space formulation, there is no confusion here. However, the old name is still linked in other articles sending the reader here, presumably to learn about the transform, and thus the phase-space formulation. The reader might end up getting the wrong impression, until this article is read more carefully. I did a secondary sweep of the wikilinks to Weyl quantization and replaced the most dangerously misleading ones. "

0

61e6fc0dc894b009

Good idea to move the page of hatred towards the bot, now when new people come on here to complain they will not realise the extent to which this bot is despised. Well done, between that tactic and Durin, this useless bot has a real future!

0

61ebbc8c12604b47

Here is Bank of America's 2009 Annual Report go to page 64 and it shows the calculation of Tier 1 Common capital and total capital. http://media.corporate-ir.net/media_files/irol/71/71595/reports/2009_AR.pdf That number is divided by Risk Adjusted Assets. Which is what I did.

0

61ff36165d88ff45

This is my account and not a puppet one. Please unblock me.

0

62008cf562bfc33d

"s healthcare"") does not necessarily indicate a pro-choice position. However, she has not explained anywhere why she thinks that another RCOG position (i.e. opposing reduction of abortion time limits) is not a pro-choice position. I will edit the present article to focus on the latter position. Opposition to reducing abortion time limits is obviously a pro-choice position, and there is no reason for everyone to spend their weekends arguing about this idea. Far from denying this idea, another editor (KillerChihua) is the one who suggested that this might be an appropriate description. Anyway, check out the new edits that I am about to make. And please respond here rather than at some other talk page. Wikipedia has a policy to explain your reverts, and I would think that this is the best place to do so. Thank you. "

0

6201e1a72c149b42

Durova you're a faggot. stop being obsessed with JoA

1

0

6208592f598bbf42

" @Drmies: First of all I want to appoligy for my too hasty re-inclusion of the content into the article, which I by the way only did because of the presumption of having satisfied all fellow editors call for adding a direct reference for the ""Reference values in the table"", which previously indeed lacked a reference. In the back-mirror, I was a little too hasty to re-instate and should of course instead first have uploaded the content to my sandbox, and then asked for the talkpage approval before uploading it again. Please however consider, that all my actions were only excecuted in good faith. Subsequently I was surprised to find a continued resistance about the content from fellow editors here at the talkpage. Based on those grounds, I of course accept your removal of the content from the article, and have just created a for the subsequent debate we shall now still continue to have, about the appropriateness (which I still claim) to include a monthly data table in the article. In regards of your claim that my most recent version of the uploaded disputed material is still WP:OR, I will request you to return with a reply why you think this is so, and what we in your opinion need to do in order for the content to satisfy the policy. As far as I know, we are allowed at Wikipedia to create our own wikitables to display fully referenced data, which it indeed was in my latest version of the data table. I admit at first to have uploaded unsourced ""Monthly reference value data"" that strived against WP:OR, which was something I only did as part of a process, in the hope for other editors (or myself) at a later stage being able to find direct sources for those values. Yesterday, I indeed managed to find a direct source for these monthly values published by the Polish Ministry of Finance. Please take into consideration, that we do not have 2 equal WP:PS for the same data but only have 1 (The Polish source), as I have managed to proof here at the talkpage that the Latvian source do not qualify for the purpose, as it did not strictly follow the published official ""ECB evaluation method"" (which it by the way funny enough also never claimed it did) - but instead has adopted its own data approach. Please also consider, that my uploaded data table with monthly data in principle can stand alone, even without that we mention the debated report by the ""Latvian Central Bank"", as I have prooved here at the talkpage they utilised another data approach than the official ""ECB method"". After I now have ellaborated on the details, do you then have a different opinion whether or not my most recent version of the uploaded material still shall be classified as WP:OR? The reason why I think it is so important that we in the Latvian article display monthly convergence values for each month for the past year, and why inclusion of this material shall not be disquallified as per WP:NOTSTATS, is because the uploaded monthly data (for the most recent 12 months) reflect how the official ""ECB method"" works, as a graphical illustration which help casual readers to grasp that all candidate countrys have been granted the right by EU to apply ECB for conducting a monthly convergence check at each month during the year (if they belief to have met all criteria). Unfortunately ECB do not automatically publish monthly convergency reports during the year (because in that case we would obviously have used their direct data for the table instead). But as I already provided evidense for, the Polish Ministry are publishing monthly reports where they check for monthly convergence and calculate the ECB reference value limits based on the official ""ECB method"" (which proofs this is notable stuff), and their findings in the Polish context has also been covered over at the Polish wikipedia (although by a much lower quality than my attempt). Taking this into consideration, will you then still argue it is inappropriate we do the same here at the English wikipedia for the Latvian article (in the version showcased by my )? Personal reply to TDL (not related to the article itself) @TDL: In the past four months there have now been a few times, where you and I clashed about the WP:OR policy. In those cases where we have clashed, I admit to have applied a backwords approach, where I started out to state the facts as I knew it was the WP:TRUTH. I have always seen such uploads as part of a process, where we were continously working to find sources and improve the articles. So my uploads were not ment to be unsourced forever, but something where it could be possible for me (or another editor) at a later stage to return and add the needed

0

6209d04454042b8d

" Ron, You are incorrect in theory that explaining the Shotokan/Karate relevance of common terms constitutes ""dictionary definitions"". Rather, what is there already, below what I am trying to add, are the dictionary definitions. However, I cannot stick to adding to the table because the entries on which I have knowledge are linked well enough. I only wish that *you* would add some Karate explanation for osu and some of the unlinked terms by adding that table column or using a footnote or two if there are only a couple of unlinked terms, and not be so terse. I've rebutted your ""pov"" argument by pointing out that I am adding no pov; everything is fact, as originally supplied by you yourself and Matt. You are just repeating yourself, I'm afraid, and you do not have a valid rebuttal to my point that clarifying notes, containing *facts only*, are useful in an encyclopedia. Matt, I am not putting any myth in the article; I am only putting debunking of it. There is a lot of hearsay about Karate, and it's important to put in what is *not* true, or someone else may come along with a feeling of certainty, and change it again. A note preempts this. This is a good point, so I'll put it in ""full caps"" (I do not intend to ""shout"", please understand, but it's a good idea to catch the eye with this:) THERE IS A LOT OF HEARSAY ABOUT KARATE, AND IT'S IMPORTANT TO PUT IN WHAT IS *NOT* TRUE, OR SOMEONE ELSE MAY COME ALONG WITH A FEELING OF CERTAINTY, AND CHANGE IT AGAIN. A NOTE PREEMPTS THIS. Best regards, "

0

620bdd3b53d3fcb0

Early in the shows history he was an exterminator but in the subtext it is clear he is a drug dealer - If you are not a fan of the show this would not be apparent so why don't fussy admin research but they just go around editing things.

0

62167cb3d3b82f15

Mediation didn't work the last time. The mediators gave up. Can't say I blame them after getting this treatment I suggest the Personal Rapid Transit page be given special consideration given the controversy. Find some real transportation engineers and transit organizations and get their definition of PRT.

0

62201dfbb3337c5e

" Well, as you can see through out the article igloo is used instead of Igloo, so I decided to lowercase it. talk? "

0

622611af0b75d579

" Gates/Slim I've replied to your note at Talk:Forbes list of billionaires and reverted your edits at Gates and Slim. Can we discuss your changes there before you make any other changes to biographies? Thanks! (talk) "

0

622a6fc041d15d6b

I see 2008 now seems to be 2000 - maybe i misread it. Somebody tried to put it back in. Their link is NOT our site nor is it affiliated with our site. If you click on the author it is a mailto “[email protected]” who has no knwon association to blueprint.

0

622b9e862d12e79a

Geniac is an assole and a mom fuker..

1

0

1

0

1

0

62377f68b606e1da

My reply, posted on the Clark peer review page: I think it is a good article. I'd never heard of the gentleman, but I did see the Veronica Mars episode cited, so it turns out I am familiar with him. While I think it is good, you will have problems getting it through FAC on the grounds some people think it is too short. Never mind that a nineteen year old isn't going to have a huge article, people will say it is too shorttrust me, I've heard this objection on my own articles, e.g. Julia Stiles and John Henninger Reagan. FAC commentators will also seize upon the photographs problem, which I don't see ought to be an impediment to getting FA status, but people will object. Now, as to the article itself . . . What happened to his father? Divorce? Something ought to be said because it looks odd mentioning only a mother. Second, I wonder if you could find some print articles about him? You might try accessing databases such as ProQuest or Ebsco through the public library. I'm hesistant about articles where all the sources are electronic. While I've used many links on articles such as Tom Brinkman and Paul Hackett, I also cited the print version so when the operators of those sites take down the electronic versions people will still be able to find the material. Third, I'd eliminate some of the red-links to movies and schools. Again, this will raise objections if you take it to FAC. Finally, most of the article is dedicated to his roles. Is there any more you could add about his personal life. Does he have any charities or causes? 14:44, August 6, 2005 (UTC)

0

623d90a3fbb814a8

" ""RMS"" or ""SS""? The article seems confused about which designation that Arundel Castle should have, as it uses both, and most likely, only one is correct. I did some digging around online, and came up empty on which is right. Help? (Talk) "

0

623f46ce82909ab3

I agree, as much as humanly possible, to avoid my role in the edit warring. Candidly, your answer to my question was a bit fuzzy, but I get your point that what qualifies as a 'revert' (any number) or as edit warring is in the judgment of the beholder. So yes, I agree to be extremely cautious about the gray line between good faith editing and reverts/edit warring. Unfortunately with articles that involve a high degree of emotions, like those associated with gun politics, tempers rise, and Yaf in the past has called my good faith edits to be reverts, and when I try to take it to the talk page, then stonewalling the talk page. I have tried WP:DR in the past with Yaf, and it failed. Check my edit history, I believe you would agree that I have in the past and will continue in the future to exceedingly patient and remained civil in difficult editing environments.

0

62427b6329ed673b

" In his letter of resignation, Sanger didn't call himself cofounder, but ""Ex-chief organizer, Wikipedia"". Could this be a compromise position? Talk| "

0

6243cbbe9c105c5f

That doesn't give you the right to speedy it. william conoley edits. here 0-@

0

6245c38b9d905fd8

I am refering to this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Metric_UK_road_sign.tif

0

6247b88c95fadb83

History of Latinos and Hispanics Please consider contributing to the article entitled History of Latinos and Hispanics. Thank you! 1m

0

6252c80690bf2259

stop what?! How is it spam to post information relevant to an article and post a link in the talk page, as you suggested, which is also relevant to the article? I see links in Wikipedia articles all the time, but they don't get deleted neurotically.

0

625f44fd7303a176

This page claims that the mean temp of earth is 287 K, yet the highest is 331 k, the lowest 184 K, and (331+184)/2= 257 K! Is this a mistake?

0

625fed37ed740b93

" Man please... what persissting edit warrings? I only add a native name! at section ""native name"". But operator Romanian adijapan dont want to accept these!! ( ) "

0

6264b25054c6ce63

I think me and Justin are going to try and get it back up to scratch. I'll go through the old version and salvage things from that and trawl the net. Though I am somewhat limited to English sources (Well, and French) as my Bulgarian is a little rusty and incredibly non-existant. Thanks for the help.

0

6271aa4298dfb013

Real-world examples If I come across any good analogs in the real world I'll be sure to add them, but I'll also be looking out for more experiments in economics not listed on Wikipedia yet - there don't seem to be nearly enough interesting experiments from such a rich field. Anyway, thanks for your additions; they were in line with what I was planning to do. I think one thing you have to be careful of in Wikipedia is that a claim is totally unsalvage-able before deleting it (some editors NEVER delete any claim from another user, even then). One reason is that many Wikipedians love fact s more than their own children, and take an accusation of factual error more seriously than aspersions against their parentage. (Hopefully I don't have as much of a problem as that but its all an interesting experiment in group dynamics.) Good luck, . 09:16, 2005 May 18 (UTC)

0

6277245011091b6e

" Peter Burwash This article is meets WP:Notability because he is a former professional tennis player, which the information is scant about him online, but here is the links that I compiled. You can use these to make the article better if you would like... [] [] [] [] Thanks, DOGTN "

0

62778b53f706339d

"{| style=""background-color:#F5FFFA; padding:0;"" cellpadding=""0"" |class=""MainPageBG"" style=""border:1px solid lightgrey; background-color:lightgrey; vertical-align:top; color:#000000; font-size:85%""| Hello, Dancingurl26! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes ""~~~~""; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being ""adopted"" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! {| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:white;"" |class=""MainPageBG"" style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid white; background-color:lightgrey; vertical-align:top""| Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability |class=""MainPageBG"" style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid lightgrey; background-color:Seashell; vertical-align:top""| {| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""0"" cellspacing=""5"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:Seashell"" ! The Community |- |style=""color:#000""| [

0

627d26779da864b3

" Dennis Brown, nothing you've listed against me is new from the previous block on my edits on Coal, when I was a far younger, less seasoned editor. In any event ""Coal"" is just a hobby and many of my edits ultimately stayed there. I can see now that I was overzealous in my youth in accusing my opponents of being Coal industry lobbyists (although I wasn't actually serious in saying that). But I fail to see how any of your comments justify a block since none of the actions you've cited are new since my previous block. What you're proposing is essentially double-jeopardy, trying me twice for the same crime which I've already paid the penalty for. Also I was only blocked twice previously. Why does everyone keep saying this is my 4th block when the pages you link to clearly show it is only my 3rd? Why am I being so harshly punished for these good-faith, rookie mistakes? I am but a young, blooming flower who only wishes to blossom, and to let Wikipedia sing its siren song of Truth and Knowledge. "

0

627d97137c61ed79

That CFD == My comment was my vote, I'm ambivilant. ==

0

62822cad6b3ab620

i need help Hi,Nihiltres, I noticed you at the adoption thing. And i kind of need mentoring.So,would you help me please?

0

628627e304afc141

" Source? — (talk2me) Born This Way Sales Gaga confirm that BTW sales are more than 5 million not 2 (http://twitter.com/#!/ladygaga/status/83643608376418304) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.250.192.85 Not a reliable source. — (talk2me) "

0

628b5def928a256b

" Thanks, I share your concerns about discouraging users. I don't know if I posted anything inflammatory, but I certainly did get visibly pissed about having to be subjected to a barrage of anti-Semitism, and then to get criticized and even attacked (""shut the hell up!"") for reporting it. In any case, it won't be discouraging meas I noted above, first thing on TO DO list after the block is over is to report the nasty, gratuitous anti-Semitic attack by above. Hey who knowsmaybe someone will even do it on my behalf in the interim. "

0

628cc689644205c5

" You're not very good at this whole ""oppression"" thing, are you? - 79.180.28.213 "

0

6290e9d1b9a207b4

Many thanks for warring but it is Wikipadida who is making Vandalism and posting the lies and unsupported quotation If Wikipadia want to threat somebody, this is not only Vandalism, that is called differently, but in Syria, we are free and honest

0

6296d1394e8fd738

" It's wikipedia policy. It's not my idea. Read the very page you suggested should be the rule. Five years' precedence is meaningless if it is wrong. Nor was this a cut and paste move, the ""Fraternity (disambiguation)"" page already existed, probably from people having gone through all this before. If this was organized they way these things already have been worked out, we wouldn't need to reinvent the wheel. If you have issues with it, Go to the Disambiguation talk page and bother them, not me.129.133.124.199 "

0

6298f315bba92a73

Sock puppet Sorry to bother you, but an obvious sock (Special:Contributions/76.232.253.147) currently performing mass deletions on Genocides in history.

0

6299d232254101ef

" Maybe as a bootleg it was ""Last flowers to the hospital"" as a work in progress, but the official release is just ""Last flowers"" full stop. 67.5.157.118 "

0

629b43f0b13d065a

Orphaned non-free image File:Star warriors.jpg Hi, Skier Dude. I put the image in the proper section in the Star Wars RPG article (since it is a spinoff it should be in the spinoffs section...). I guess that now the orphaned image banner can be removed. Do you agree?

0

629b7e5da8d2f568

The Godfray and Turner references say that the Moon's annual path around the Sun is concave. Other reference like this one say that it's convex. That seems like a conflict to me. Now, maybe you'll claim that the Godfray and Turner references are looking outward from the POV of the Sun, and the other references are looking inward at the entire system, and that explains the difference. But I still don't acknowledge a distinction between convex/concave when looking outward from the inside, and convex/concave when looking inward at the entire system. Hopefully Marc will clear up some of that when he responds to my question above. -

0

629da30601e30266

Cement trucks Hi, I wonder if someone could answer a couple of trivia questions: 1) Is there something preventing concrete from hardening in those rotating cement mixer trucks, or are they just hoping that they'll get to their destination in time? 2) What happens if it does harden in there? Do they just discard the barrel, or is there some way to deconstruct it and get it off the concrete plug? Thanks!

0

62a07d9df829a329

Agreed, this article needs a popular culture section precisely because of the reason you stated. Thanks for the clean up and other stuff. - (talk | contribs)

0

62a0db0ae7104cdf

"Oh, and for the record – it's ""whose."" "

0

62a389b35f685554

"==Why?== 35 pages link here. saith the Prime ♥ 07:22, 1 Aug 2008 (UTC) "

0

62a49951cdf2b7fb

" Help me! Please help me with create a reference list. I have a list of references (9) but do not know how to present them in a ""reflist"" "

0

62b5cab89a41420c

" There you go Again Cut it out, ""pops"". Quit trying to force people's hands, it won't work for you. "

0

62b7ae0d7e5f95c0

i have 2 replies on this subject 1, I do believe that on talk pages slight points of view are allowed if that is incorrect please notify me of this, and 2 most of my talks have been around the same time i was playing MMORPGs and on chat sites and perhaps my behaviour their leaked over.

0

62c088a91cb457d6

" The Protocols isn't a ""conspiracy theory"" it is a false document intended to support certain conspiracy theories which predated its own authoring. It is mentioned under false document, but of course should also be mentioned here. There are whole categories of antisemitic conspiracy theories which should be discussed in this article; however, when I was working out the ""Subjects of conspiracy theory"" section, I didn't have the stomach to address them. I still don't. I would overall be more interested in this article as a discussion of the structure and function of conspiracy theories what they mean to people, what broad categories they cover, and how they interact with mainstream history than as another ""List of"" page. I hate ""List of"" pages. But that's probably just me. "

0

62d06ef532d0df4e

You have neither, so stop pushing that change.-

0

62d1d2c9089ff900

Dear Mr Warrior cyber bullying is not funny. I am sorry if I have hurt your feelings over the years.

0

62d3f4be636da324

" ""gold"" release? This is used almost never now. If someone can back up the claim that's it's used frequently, then specify this here, otherwise someone will have to change it. (By backing it up I mean a notable computer software company). "

0

62db72535644c6c9

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!We hope you like the place and decide to stay. Thank you for your contributions as we've noticed that you've been making some great additions to the Wikipedia at the Lhasa Apso article and we really appreciate it. I'm sorry but I slightly changed the contribution you made about feeding because it included a link to a commercial site (Royal Canin). I have also inserted a note that a reference is needed for the information you've included. You can see the changes I made at the article here. If you have any questions or concerns about this, please let me know. Why not create an account and stay awhile? The Wikipedia can use as many quality members as possible. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Introduction to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia Editing tutorial How to edit a page Manual of style The basics of Wikicode How to develop an article How to create an article Help pages What Wikipedia is not Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your post. If you need any help at all, you can contact me on my talk page or why not pop over to the Teahouse where there are always very patient, helpful and experienced editors available to give you a hand.

0

62dcb6003bd3ccd6

Attack in NJ FYI NBC report.

0

62e736877c28bf05

fuck you Wanker

1

0

1

0

62e93d5ab7fb146f

Thanks! But i know the rules i gonna tell you the same way i told other. DO NOT LEAVE ME MESSAGES. THEY WILL BE DELETED OR INNORED. i upload Image:394589.jpg. as a album cover. do not worry about how it was upload and do not snoop in my business. soccermeko

0

62eb0e271697b26d

Why? Since a separate person readded it & I stated that it should be part of WP proper, I don't know why you'd move it to your own userspace. Do you intend to clean the list up & then readd it?

0

62f3eae85974f364

stop pretending Stop pretending to be cool. I don't really care what you do. Go ahead and ban me, I can change my IP in less than 5 seconds or I can use 1 of the thousands of spoofs, vpns, etc, etc. I don't even have to close my browser to do it. You should also know that even if you vandalize my IP user page, I'm still not going to read your reply. Do yourself a favor and go fuck your wife before somebody else does. 1, 2, 3, 4. Let's have an edit war.

1

0

1

0

62fb344bc50b283f

Does Conner the Prince of Asia? Conner, prince of Asia

0

62fdc765f36474e5

Isn't that your goal? ~SLURP~ I'll still find you after being banned.

1

0

62ff3d319aa97d28

Looks like more hate toward anarchocapitalism from those who want there to be a government. Can't you people stop trying to marginalize it? Are you scared that people will throw off the shackles of government? -

0

63027edf4d03747f

" Question... ...where, and when did the ""NERF Wars"" get their names? PLZ reply on my Talk page. 76.95.66.209 "

0

6302d847be4b11a1

Myth of the Southern Strategy It's clear you are biased in your editing of the Southern Strategy article. Between you and two other clearly biased editors I guess you have done a good job of keeping meaningful discussion at bay. Good job!129.59.79.123

0

630ce380191145ed

the biggest nob'''Italic text

0

630d994f72d6aee5

" Wow... are we all supposed to have total trust in some ""alleged verbal"" confession??? because the police stuffed-up their investigations - lack of scientific forensic evidence, missing pieces of vital evidence and all those inconsistencies in eyewitnesses evidence? Do we just go ahead and execute people based on ""alleged verbals""??? And please explain Purrums, why Grindlay didn't go directly to the authorities to make an official report of Ryan's ""alleged verbal"" confession? After all, Grindlay was the top-notch man at Pentridge and he surely would called a special meeting to report and discuss such an amazing verbal confession to inform government leaders, prison authorities, televison, radio and other media journalists from around Australia, prosecutors and defence laywers, Father Brosnan and et al. Why would Ryan confess to Grindlay while at the eleventh-hour Ryan wrote letters to various people protesting his innocence? Ryan had to write his letters on toilet paper and then he was also refused his right to make a ""last statement"" just prior to execution. Smells fishy to me! The various documentary films, based on meticulous research including archival material and interviews by living people (including Grindlay) who were directly involved in the Ryan case do not even mention such a confession taking place - because it didn't happen! Professional film-makers know better than to make false allegations, which can result in being sued for compensation of millions of dollars. Documentary films are based on facts and truth. When will Purrums provide ""proof"" that Ryan fired a shot??????????? 60.224.64.166 "

0

631421202b72739d

" Modern mainstream economics The modern mainstream economics section repeats itself a lot. It opens with ""Mainstream economics begins with the premise that resources are scarce and that it is necessary to choose between competing alternatives."" this is a reiteration of something found in the opening of the article - ""the science which studies human behaviour as a relationship between ends and scarce means which have alternative uses."" Someone must really like repeating that though because later on in this section we see ""Economics studies how individuals and societies seek to satisfy needs and wants through incentives, choices, and allocation of scarce resources."" Then later in this section we see ""neoclassical economics, which began to develop in the late 1800s and models choices made in the allocation of scarce resources."" Then later in this section ""It is sometimes referred to as the study of choice under conditions of scarcity."" Then later in this section ""Economics is a broad term given to the social science of how choices are made in face of limited resources."" Then later in this section a word for word repetition of what was said in the opening - ""the science which studies human behavior as a relationship between given ends and scarce means which have alternative uses"" Reading all of this I conclude that mainstream economics studies the relationship between given ends and scarce means which have alternative uses. But I do not need to be told this six times (seven, if you count the opening). This section also repeats itself in other ways. I am removing redundancy from it. "

0

631cb43f93f16031

" Note: While undue weight is a legitimate concern, notability is not a limitation on the content of an article, only on the subject of article. If something related to an individual is reported on in reliable secondary sources, you can be relatively certain it is of sufficient relevance to the individual to merit mention., article length permittingSkomorokh "

0

6322f356f9686809

" Ban of ""Bryansee"" from Wikipediocracy. Hey, you are Zoloft. The one who banned me from Wikipediocracy with a threat that I die. ""Well"" means dead. ""Recover"" means ""die"". You are wanting me to die by a medication increase or meet my maker. Check this out: 103.244.189.136 "

1

0

6322f5e07686440d

" Social Credit I am curious to know how this change ""corrects a misleading statement""? Social Credit never won a federal seat in English Canada again, as far as I know. | t "

0

6328d77f65348fe1

INPORTANT You Know What I Dont Have To Listen To You I Worked Hard And My Creative Skills Are GOOD ! ElvisPresley1

0

63328f41777f21a5

Please, explain what means: Hellenized origin. Hellenisation is a process but not origin.

0

6333f15af5ffe690

Removal of comments and Afd from a banned user I was wondering the same thing. It would make sense that you should be able to go in and close all of them out, however I haven't been around long enough to know for sure. I am also hesitant to try to do one or two of them because he appears to have some sort of connection with somebody else on here. There is another editor that was following him around, backing everything he did. When he was getting locked out, this user was even going to his talk page trying to defend him with basically the same arguments that he was using. I'm fairly certain there is a connection between the two, whether this guy has multiple accounts, or its a friend or family member, I don't know. I just picked up on a very odd connection between them. This person is still going after my articles and posting bogus reasons to delete sections of them. Until we can be certain we can do it, I'm not going to risk it because I'm sure his other account/partner will immediately report us if we do.

0

63431c2fdb752b5a

Hello Mr Friendly Here is the article you cannot delete: I wanted to ask you to block me permanently from Wikipedia, but then I realized you cannot do that. What a pity. That is what I want. Unfortunately you cannot do that.

0

634ad7183ec9d16b

... ahhh, the editorial douchery!)

0

634b5f5707148c18

" Hard to get kids to give up their hobby horse. I am too new to Wikipedia to have a clue as to what one can do about a situation like this. I see the need to cover the various theories because were it not for her disappearance and the various conspiracy theories that grew up over the years Earhart would be little known today. What is amusing is that such theories took 20 years to emerge. Aviators of that time had a pretty good idea what could go wrong. I see there is a lock-down about 'disputes"". I feel the facts of the matter speak for themselves, but those who wish the Electra to have unlimited range, and the ability to carry more weight than it did will never be dissuaded by facts. "

0

635361a46f7f2de8

" Welcome to Deletionist Wikipedia. I'll be your [username deleted] Mate1 "

0

635693ff20cf7004

" I should also point out that the lack of censorship of Monsanto under WP:BLP is an omission, not a logical necessity. The doctrine of corporate personhood does prevail legally; you can be sued for libeling a corporation. There's absolutely no reason that the BLP fanatics don't attack that article and excise all the most notable and widely-documented allegations calling it a ""WP:Attack page"" and so on, except that they must still worry that people would rebel. But they purge more inclusionists from the site every day - sooner or later, it is inevitable that they will do so unless stopped. "

0

63572c197ea75e7a

Two problems with this article And these they are: The definition has a link to ill-conditioned that redirects to this article. So there is a need to explain what well-conditioned and ill-conditioned are and to remove this link. The definition writes about problem's amenability to digital computation. However, in the section for condition number of a matrix it is mentioned that conditioning is a property of the matrix and not of floating point arithmetics or rounding off errors.

0

635765b4a8650e06

. I'd appreciate your further input

0

63585b309c5320f8

Alfred Tinnenbaum Hi-Please look at the article about Alfred Tinnenbaum. Why do I think this is a hoax done by some college student? Nothing came up on Alfred Tinnenbaum on Google. I had been working on the Iowa Territory article and I would had come across this. I hope you are doing well-

0

635d1773e0504838

" There were several issues with your edit 1) content must be attributed to a reliable source and not just your personal commentary see also WP:CITE 2) the use of gratuitous hyperbole and random praise such as ""megahit"" are not suitable for an encyclopedia. Active (bananaphone "

0

636365babb46dab8

reason to be unblocked here}}

0

6364b4647e74dae2

Don't you wikipedians have an ignore policy for trolls? ) Thanks for feeding, he he. Well, you have a LUCID troll around. Thanks for giving me material for a diss. 94.254.193.66

0

636dc7bffa8bc5a8

"== A == I'm pretty certain that the band A provided at least some of the fictional group's songs. The song ""Bad Mistake"" from How Ace Are Buildings was definitely in the show. "

0

636ece8e30aefca6

Clean up? Yeah, I noticed that remark. I think that it is spam.

0