id
stringlengths
16
16
comment_text
stringlengths
6
5k
toxic
int64
0
1
severe_toxic
int64
0
1
obscene
int64
0
1
threat
int64
0
1
insult
int64
0
1
identity_hate
int64
0
1
7e268e3b1c4042a8
Sounds french, anyone has more info and could document this? thanks
0
0
0
0
0
0
7e2ebc8c052dd5d8
" Format of quotations I've done some copyediting. In particular, there was a problem that a full stop was placed before a footnote, the footnote was added, and another full stop was placed after it. A few quotations had not been closed with quotation marks, etc. Some quotations have are enclosed in tags, which seem, according to my eye, to change them into italics but not to do anything else. I don't see any reason to have some quotations in italics and some not. Actually, I don't see any reason to have any quotations in italics. We've already had problems (in the Hitler article from which this section comes) with someome putting quotations that implied that Hitler was a fervent Christian in block quotes, and leaving the quotations that implied he was anti-Christian embedded in the text where they wouldn't look so obvious, and later saying that was done according to the length of each quotation (a claim which was refuted by a simple word count). I don't see a pattern in other articles of quotations being in italics. I'm going to change all of the quotations to plain text (i.e. not italics). Long quotations can, of course, go in block quotes, regardless of which POV they support. Unrelated to the issue of format is the use of the word ""deplored"" in the last sentence. I propose changing that to ""rejected"". ""Deplored"" suggests shock and anger at the fact that this idea existed, rather than simply rejection of the idea. If I'm mistaken in this (as I don't know whether Hitler condemned the idea that Nazism was a religion, or the the idea that anyone would think it was), please change it back. ♫ "
0
0
0
0
0
0
7e317113b4a5ee63
Another question for you. What accounts and ip's have you edited under. What is your current ip address and isprovider?
0
0
0
0
0
0
7e3449a3d65fe0e2
" There he goes again! Don't block him! I find the term a personal honour. I don't expect any fairness from you. Holla at me! "
0
0
0
0
0
0
7e3645ab72b9f8eb
OK LISTEN AIRPLANE GUY HOW DARE YOU - DO U HJAVE NO RESPECT FOR DAVID BURGER? WHAT PROOF DO U HAVE?.. NONE!- YOU ARTE AN INSULT TO DAVID BURGER- HIS CHILDREN- AND HIS CHILDRENS CHILDREN- AND HIS CHILDRENS CHILDRENS CHILDREN. HE WAS A LEGEND THAT MADE GREAT MUSIC. U SHOULD BE ASHAMED.
1
0
0
0
0
0
7e3d918bb89a2d79
" After reviewing the deletion, I think the error is technical. I am on a Hughes Sat network that uses transparent proxies. This was causing me to log in and out from page to page. The original article which was not the correct article went through and posted when I switched to SSL wiki server. This was unexpected, and as I was editing the article to the correct format it was deleted. (roughly 60-90 seconds from the originally post) Due to this technical error the correct post was never entered into wiki. This would have been the correct post if the article had not been deleting during editing and if I had not had technical issues which inadvertly caused me to post the incorrect format of the article. The Clifton Steamboat Museum The Clifton Steamboat Museum is located at 8727 Fannett Rd, Beaumont, Texas. The museum art galleries portray the wars fought in Southeast Texas and Louisiana, as well as the Steamboat era, World War I, World War II, Korea, and Vietnam. The museum offers many historical exhibits of Texas and the Beaumont - Port Arthur region. The Clifton Steamboat Museum consists of a 24,000 square feet, two-story museum that is handicap accessible, and contains various exhibits. The theme of the museum is ""Heroes... Past, Present, and Future,"" honoring both American military and civilian heroes. Upper art galleries of the museum feature original bronze sculptures; Native American artists, wildlife, and frontier paintings from famous artists. A special gallery in the museum is dedicated to the Boy Scouts. This boy scouts gallery features many historical scouting artifacts, some dating back before the 1960's. There is also the tugboat, ""Hercules,"" standing at 36 feet high, 22 feet wide, and 92 feet long. List of Current Exhibits: 1. ""Freedom's Warrior"" by Charles Banks Wilson 1b. Eagle Statue by Max Turner 2. Clifton's Bedroom Furniture 3. Clifton Family Gallery 4. Port Arthur Grain Elevator 5. Hercules Engine & Artifacts 6. City of Beaumont - History 7. Area and Beaumont History (Models by William T. Faucett) 8. Herring Coe & Albert Merrikin 8b. Texaco Mississippi by H.G. Lewis 9. Battle of Sabine Pass 10. Battle of Calcasieu Pass (Models by Robert V. Hass - Murals by Jack Feagan) 11. Second Texas Navy (Models by Robert V. Hass, Prints by Fred Toler) 12. First Texas Navy & Texas Republic Currency 13. Civil War Weapons & Currency 14. CSS Alabama vs. USS Hatteras (Models by Robert V. Hass) 15. Battle of Galveston (Murals by Jack Feagan, Prints by Claude Monet, Sam McCausland) 16. Battle of Galveston (Murals by Jack Feagan) 16a. Works of Matchett Herring Coe 17. Texas Heroes Gallery: Lighted murals and several Presidents (William Henry Huddle, Lajos Markos, Stephen Seymour Thomas, H.A. McArdle, Larry Wheeler) (1-3) 17b. Antartica's First Lady: Edith 'Jackie' Ronne was the first American woman to reach the Antartica. 18. Sabine Pass Lighthouse: Port Arthur Mardi Gras, & USS Spruance (Jack Feagan) 19. WWI posters & Rockwell prints (Norman Rockwell) 19b. Field of Blue (G.W. Lundeen) 20. Battle of Guadalcanal (Sculptures by William Hunter. Prints by Jim Laurier, Robert Taylor, Colonel Charles Waterhouse, Shigeo Koike, John Young, Roy Grinnell, David Poole, & C. S. Bailey) 21. WWII Aircraft Models (Models by Bill Janis) 22. Pearl Harbor Survivors (Jerry Crandall, John Ficklen) 23. WWII Pacific Theater(Models by Bill Janis, Prints by Shigeo Koike, C. C. Beall, Ted Wilbur, R.G. Smith) 24. WWII European Theater (Sculpture by Michael Garman. Prints by Jerry Crandall. Models by Bill Janis) 25. Jes MacArthur & Corwin Mendenhall 26. Korean Conflict (R.A. Benjamin) 27. Future exhibits 28. Vietnam Conflict 29. US Navy: retired officers & ships (Whalen) 30. US Navy current officers & ships So I think I understand why my original post was deleted - basically because I was unable to enter the correct article within the 90 seconds from creation to deletion. If this is correct, can you please tell me if this article would be acceptable. I plan on adding bio's for all the museums artist's, so please let me know where, if any, I am not in compliance with wiki. Sincerly "
0
0
0
0
0
0
7e40d0a68384200f
Deletion of Deathkiller A tag has been placed on Deathkiller, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason: Recreation of a previously deleted article- CSD G4 Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines. For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
0
0
0
0
0
0
7e40d2ad4ef45b62
FUCK YOU! FUCK YOU! FUCK YOU! FUCK YOU! FUCK YOU! FUCK YOU! FUCK YOU! FUCK YOU! FUCK YOU! FUCK YOU! FUCK YOU! FUCK YOU! FUCK YOU! FUCK YOU! FUCK YOU! FUCK YOU! FUCK YOU! FUCK YOU!
1
1
1
0
0
0
7e41ed6b39ea84fb
" August 2008 (UTC) If ""an article's name must be free from significant ambiguity, and should be clear"", then how is an ""invasion of Manchuria"" relevant to the content of the article? (comms) ♠♥♦♣ 00:01, 3"
0
0
0
0
0
0
7e44771dba3000d5
" Page 280: ""By the end of World War II, a staggering 95% of Russia's country estates had disappeared. Some had been targeted for destruction; most however, were simply abandoned, plundered and then forgotten, left to rot, decay and fall into ruin. An entire cultural legacy had been wiped from the face of the earth."" attributed to: Okhrana i restavratsiia, 24 Russkaia usad 'ba, 145, 155; Poliakova, ""Usadebnaia kul'tura 19."
0
0
0
0
0
0
7e452c5d0fa7b66c
fuck you...my wish...its a public property
1
0
1
0
0
0
7e4c969546701ca4
Re: February 2008 Welcome to reality. In response to your message: I shall resume to delete that foul image as long as time permits. I understand that Wikipedia is uncensored, but such an image is simply unnecessary. The sketch depicts the act well enough there is no need for further illustration.
0
0
0
0
0
0
7e4e332743ab34b5
Thank you! Thanks for the photoshop job! ) 22:27, 13 Aug 2004 (UTC)
0
0
0
0
0
0
7e553971e813785f
That's nice. All I'm asking you to do is abide by WP:BLP, you were not doing that earlier, hopefully you will in the future.
0
0
0
0
0
0
7e583f19e03afb44
largely copyvio - talk/email
0
0
0
0
0
0
7e5c165be85b0194
Confidence interval Your input at Talk:Confidence interval would be appreciated, if you feel it's worth the frustration. Thanks. darin 69.45.178.143
0
0
0
0
0
0
7e5d5b755708fd62
Not so much that the globe isnt getting warmer because it is, however there is alot of evidence to contradict our impact on the matter, alot does say we have increased the rate but it would have happened regardless.
0
0
0
0
0
0
7e67e93170f0cf05
Friendly advice I know it's tough. He can certainly be infuriating I know. It might be a good idea to just 'drop-out' for a bit and let other editors deal with him. Choose one of your favourite articles that he doesn't edit and work on that for a while. I know you don't intend this, but the 'discussions' you 2 have often escalate to such an extent that the issues have been sidetracked to your personalities; this damages the work and spoils things for other editors with really good ideas and things to say.
0
0
0
0
0
0
7e70b6d356963853
I do wish to appeal against this block & I should like you to review carefully the sequence of events. None of this course of events was instigated by me - I have called an Administrator by 'phone (whom I know to explain the situation). What you have just done would imply guilt on my part (& whilst I don't claim to be perfect) this scenario is categorically none of my making & my messages to their Talk pages were in response to receiving message alerts from them by way of that red light - Mabelina 0 Talk - popping up at the top which I thought should be replied to? This hardly seems reasonable to me but no doubt the protagonists are chuffed to bits (I've already had a message from is the major cause of this ruction - I think User talk:Qexigator will provide you with a balanced view of the matter. Furthermore I guess you will have to decide whether you are with them or me - I have asked for an enquiry into their application of MOS which I trust will be forthcoming. Bottom line is that I add good info to Wiki whereas I am constantly harassed by a gang of about 3/4 people about MOS. Quality info (with incorrect MOS) or MOS at all costs - you decide. Please advise soonest. Many thanks User talk:Mabelina M
0
0
0
0
0
0
7e75d485807a4a7d
My DYK? Nomination I just wanted to let you know that I have now responded to your comments here Template:Did you know nominations/Saar status referendum, 1935. Please respond back to me whenever you are able to. Thank you very much.
0
0
0
0
0
0
7e8c9cc4b932481c
duvetica Jacket - Save Your Life Before it is Too Late! Life is valuable and expensive; there is absolutely nothing you can perform after it is lost. Therefore, attempt your greatest to produce your lifestyle as secure and safe since it can possibly be. a number of us have hobbies which could prove to get fatal. We ought to get satisfaction from lifestyle and do not stop trying this sort of hobbies to some restricted extend, but we ought to also not disregard all of the security and precautions we are able to consider for our properly being. duvetica is truly a manufacturer that provides incredible motorcycle jackets to assure security for motorcyclists. These jackets are readily available in extremely inexpensive costs and could be purchased quickly via current market shops or on-line stores. Available for the two the gender, these duvetica jackets could be discovered in numerous sizes to fit everybody who would like to shield his/her life. colours that include blue, black, yellow, light and countless other people could be discovered to go with your requires and tastes. The jackets are actually created by utilizing incredible medical technologies and advance techniques, which assist guarding your lifestyle with the greatest feasible way. While riding your bicycle you can indulge your self into various sorts of big and minor accidents. The jackets are actually created to safe your upper entire body component in the fantastic way. Spines, elbows, arms and chest elements are guaranteed to get secure while you put on this jacket whilst riding close to in your motorbike. The removable insulator liners with the jackets allow you to utilize the jackets for summers along with for winters. These duvetica thia attribute C.E protectors in elbows and shoulders which assist maintain them unhurt and unharmed throughout an accident. produced of nylon shell, the jackets are wind and drinking water resistant. The presence of elastic sleeve adjusters assures comfort and security at precisely the same time. Spinal protectors could also be added, according for your desire. Removable spinal pads with pockets are produced to guarantee that you can include added protectors for all those who want. The jackets provide a sort of the glow-in-the-dark effect, which tends to make the wearer noticeable even with the dark. This level of quality from the jackets assists stopping mishaps with the dim from the night.
0
0
0
0
0
0
7e941b44ad5bdbf9
" Admins can see deleted pages anyway; Sammy can enjoy it till the cows come home. oP "
0
0
0
0
0
0
7e947487314304c3
yes, that's the one ) —  Timothy (not Tim dagnabbit!)
0
0
0
0
0
0
7e9df80623ce2001
Cool ) Although, Pixie Geldof was such an obvious keep that I don't see the problem. In fact, as a non-admin I can only do really obvious keeps. I can see how commenting and then closing might be more problematic if the nomination is more controversial though.
0
0
0
0
0
0
7ea6fd8b2716ec92
" It was here, in the Roesgen Talkk page where you said: ""Enough with the teabaggers who pop up every few days, we should try to have the article semi-protected again. Remember folks, this is a BLP"" As it was both in direct response to my edit - and I was the only person active there at all in the last three weeks or so, and it was in a section of talk that I had started and been the only one posted in - I took it as directed at me. I was then told by the other owner, ""If you aren't one, then he wasn't talking to you."" This was my response: 'Bullshit. You don't attack the only person you're having a discussion with and ask for the article to be locked and then defend it by saying, 'well, if your not one - then he's not talking to you'. The accusation is the attack and nothing I've said or done here, nor in my recent edit history at the Republican congressman's article referenced above indicates any bias. I notice however that the home page of one of the two editors standing sentry over his pet article has dozens of claims of profound liberal bias proudly festooned across the page like a Volvo in Vermont on it's way to the Northeast Kingdom. One usually finds such committed and messianic people to be deeply wedded to their cause and saturated to the bone with inflexible bias - whether on the left, right or third way. False unsubstantiated accusations, blatant bias, article ""ownership"" and the complete lack of any effort to defend the inclusion of drivel, garbage and fluff into the encyclopedia is ridiculous and nothing more has been done by the ""guards"" than revert, attack and ignore''.99.141.246.39 "
0
0
0
0
0
0
7ea82b9a2473c3df
Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  -
0
0
0
0
0
0
7eab3fa5f353281a
" I do not believe there is a plagiarism issue here, which can be fixed, if necessary, with quotes. Also, you write: ""He is not citing the abstract. He is citing the entire paper and using a relevant quote from the abstract as part of the citation...."" That sounds quite inconsistent. Bottom line: we cite articles, not abstracts. You are free to read the consensus on the RS noticeboard. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
7eb1a585340b548d
" Your submission at Articles for creation Your article submission has been declined, and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Monet Jewelry was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to resubmit once the issues have been addressed. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! "
0
0
0
0
0
0
7eb42ae482ac14b1
" Candidate for deletion This seems like a serious article with some serious problems. The lead ""Pseudophilosophy is a term..."" has no sourcing. The lead, and especially the first paragraphy of an article, is like a definition and therefore requires sourcing. The body of the article is sourced, but it's just a list of where ""pseudo-philosophy"" has been used before, but does not justify the lead. I tried myself to quickly find some reliable source that would justify the lead, but couldn't find anything. The section ""Accusations against popular philosophers"" should probably be removed the way it is now. Two of the entries are un-cited and the Rand citation is by a writer of unknown qualifications. Also, I can see this section degenerating into a ""philosophy I hate"" list. The article seems to me, the way it is now, to be a candidate for deletion. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
7eb6759e84439bc9
UNFAIRLY BLOCKED I have been unfairly blocked, User:Bsadowski emailed me calling me a bin-dipping, shoe-stealing fool or something, he's framed me. Don't let assumptions get in the way of common sense. Wikipedia is politically correct and full of no-life stalker admins. Gwern is a criminal.
0
0
0
0
0
0
7eb81ceaf1cc4239
i think proffesor frink should but not the mafia
0
0
0
0
0
0
7ebbca283ca7c03c
Who knows? Maybe the bigger question is why did they bring back Battlestars first, just under a year after it left the air?
0
0
0
0
0
0
7ec33d3c36d6d3d7
unneccisary crap saying that thing about naruto is completely not needed, as well as the fact that the terms itself is fan made naming an action that happens in anime. i seriously doubt that acne faced wapanese made up hammerspace after the act started some 70 years before in american cartoons you also have no proof that the term is accosiated with anime all the time either, and the fact that many more people know about mickey mouse and bugs bunny than ranmafag or whatever completely proves that wrong there.
1
0
0
0
0
0
7ec61f1317ea93f1
" I won't object if you revert it, but in context ""convention against torture"" does not clutter the quotation, violate the principle of leaving quotations unchanged, or mislead or confuse the reader. To the contrary, it keeps the quotation intact yet still clarifies which convention against torture is being alluded to, and offers the interested reader a chance to effortlessly jump to a full explanation if desired. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
7ec7e12bd654c995
Orange mike desprite for pussy to stupid to use the net to get it
1
0
1
0
1
0
7ecb01c42716c125
" Speedy deletion of How to Defend reputation A tag has been placed on How to Defend reputation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
7ecb3f04d293b8fe
Megaprojects I just came across Oil_megaprojects#Application_to_oil_supply_forecasting. Seems it's actually being used by off-wiki websites! I'm going to try to improve it's poor/total-lack-of sourcing but was wondering if you would have a look when you get a chance.
0
0
0
0
0
0
7ecc2759afe8f903
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
0
0
0
0
0
0
7ecef74179ef6c0c
Impact on plastics recycling? Does rubber toughening make plastics difficult or impossible to recycle? Most recycling processes require purifying the material to prevent process contamination. It seems possible that a toughening coating may not be separable and may foul the purification process, but I am not a polymer engineer or scientist.
0
0
0
0
0
0
7ed4b35649ca03c1
I understand. I'll leave the wording as it is, since the consensus is obviously against me.
0
0
0
0
0
0
7edcacfb07a307b2
Three comments in a row? Get help. It's sufficient to quote QUALIFIED EXPERTS with books from UNIVERSITIES stating that Caphtor = Crete. You keep on quoting fringe and bullshit. Nuff said.
1
0
0
0
0
0
7eed3d90e35abc84
can't believe this article was deleted I'm surprised you didn't vote keep for this article. but then again, it was deleted for this reason.
0
0
0
0
0
0
7eee25318856c621
Not necessarily. Wikipedia has this absurd concept of WP:DUCK where some half-arsed admin, usually a clerk, can sentence you for sockery just because he thinks you're one, and you're not allowed to request an SPI to prove your innocence due to another perversion of Wikipedia. What a place eh! Anyway, amybe all protagonists at BI should be SPI'd on a routine basis. I'm sure it would throw up psome amazing stuff. Some of the anti lot are deffo socks.
0
0
0
0
0
0
7eef92cc94706b81
I'm new to Twinkle, so I don't know when to tag and when NOT tccsdnew
0
0
0
0
0
0
7ef40dcaa3d9d190
Ah come on. Not even jokes are tolerated? On an anonymus user page. Fine. Mr. Lilithborne doesn't molest goats. But perhaps Rams...
1
0
0
0
0
0
7ef47159518cf98d
In the beginning of the text and in the chart on the right side I can find two different numbers of participants of the NPT. 188 and 187. Probably he latter one refers to the opting out of North Korea. Is that right? Philipp
0
0
0
0
0
0
7ef752f86001b95d
is an obvious Ukrainian troll. How is he allowed to edit articles on Russia? There are no legitimate reasons not to include Crimean population in the total population of Russia, because these people obviously don't live in Ukraine. They all have Russian passports for goodness' sake!
0
0
0
0
0
0
7ef790d4bbbb0a93
" Re the definition of what is obsolete, that is simple. Every concept is built based on some data. When new data have been obtained, the concept must either accommodate these data or explain why these data can be ignored. The concept that fail to do so is deemed obsolete. For instance, the early theory of the Universe claimed that the Universe is stationary. However, after discovery of the red shift by Hubble it became obvious that this theory is inconsistent with these data. Now this theory is believed to be obsolete. The term ""archival revolution"" is used by scholars to describe massive opening of formerly secret archives before western researchers. Obviously, the concepts that existed before this archival revolution, and the concepts that failed to take into account new data (accept of convincingly refute) are deemed obsolete now. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
7ef7c8460d63d546
Merger discussion for Pre-Botzinger Complex An article that you have been involved in editing, Pre-Botzinger Complex , has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you.
0
0
0
0
0
0
7efe29fde94c15f4
ordu There's nothing wrong with using Armenian sources except when they are the only sources that are used to support a disputed and an inflammatory Armenian claim. Then it becomes POV and biased - even if it is true. And it may very well be true but nobody has provided unbiased or NPOV sources in 5 months. Just one passage from an Armenian hardly qualifies as a source and reverting over and over again isn't going to make it a fact either. If you have a logical explanation why this guy is not biased or not POV, let me hear it. Also, when talking about 90 years ago, you can't put it in the Population section of Ordu today. How is that irrelevant? What next? Apes and homo-erectus who lived there 10,000 years ago? Let's be serious.
0
0
0
0
0
0
7f00eb50b518f013
The process against Grabovoi is an enciclopedia of all the possible violations of the human rights and the Russian Constitution. Those, who studied the case, know it very well. None of the episodes has been proved by the prosecution, still he has been charged 11 years! Murderers get less in Russia. The true reason for the victimizing of the prominrent Academic and a very powerful psychic was his wish to become the President of Russia and to buid a Heaven for everyone. He had a good chance, and what Putin does to his political opponents is well known in Russia and in the World. That's why the article needs to be corrected. The Article about Graboboy on the Russian Wikipedia is much bigger and looks way more open minded. Why his followers were called a sect in the article? What's the ground for it? And the lack of publications and TV programs - it's a mistake. There were and there are plenty, but all very aggressive to Grabovoy and full of lies. TV and nearly all the media is under the Government's control in Russia.
0
0
0
0
0
0
7f048d23d4bd0c88
A City Warning why'd you delete A City Warning? They meet WP:BAND. I'm a big fan.
0
0
0
0
0
0
7f059d52e2510cc0
" Im cool with it . I don't really agree . As far as what really constitutes immunity like it says about things like reverting vandalism and Restoring removal of sourced material. Also I only wet so far pretty much because I only just learned how to report that stuff just now . However you probably have more experience with that and I done really see any reason to request its removal of my block . If you wanted to I would be cool with it however . Its fine . I got what I needed which was someone to help to curtail the removal of the truth, which is more helpful to others and to see what was/is/has been going on . So thanks for your help . It wasn't a personal attack and if it was or seemed so it wasn't meant to be. I thought there was an automatic notice I didn't know a person had to initiate that . As long as the real truth is there or is debated (on the talk page)until its ""perfect"" Im fine with everything and hope someone keeps an eye on it for vandalism . I really thought because never do this I thought because I was re-adding sourced material. In consensus with the page that there was only like a 5% chance I could be blocked. In favor of the story being correct I took that chance. If you are ""mad"" or whatever and consider it to be a ""personal"" attack it either is or isn't . I say it isn't . I was being ""real"" .You say it is. You probably know more than me about it so Ill go with that . See you out there . Hows that ."
0
0
0
0
0
0
7f067632b04a950a
There seemed to be no other way to get through to
0
0
0
0
0
0
7f0abe2907764fa7
Who is a vandal, Mr.Dinesh Kannambadi Do not accuse others of being vandals. Because Ninlil's intervention did not seem partial to you, you have resorted to getting the page 'blocked from edits in the garb of it being an FA category (howsoever inaccurate' by Yellowmonkey. Now whom should the question be asked: whether it is appropriate to mention the demise of the Cholas along with the demise of the Chalukyas, when it is clearly known to everyone that the Chalukyas first remained without a capital for over 30 years up to 1160/65 and finally demised in 1189/1192 AD with the Cholas lasting another 9 decades before being routed and finally eclipsed by the Pandiyans in 1279 AD?. This is simply because there is no relationship between the demise of the two kingdoms, the Cholas did not cause extinction of the Chalukyas or vice versa. The demise of the Chalukyas does not deserve mention in the Chola page even though the Cholas existed, but mainly because the Chalukyas were mainly consumed by their local rivals. Then what could be the reason for mentioning the demise of the Cholas in the page of the Chalukyas who demised many, many years before them? Can we also be enlightened under what rules of Wikipedia not understood by vandals, is this kind of editing and then awarding an article such as this riddled with holes is permissible?
0
0
0
0
0
0
7f0b64674231f975
" I'd agree with your original point. I would say the KID is characterized by, among other things, the move d7-d6. No one who talks about chess seriously talks about ""the Indian Defence"". "
0
0
0
0
0
0
7f0f1a7286ecbc51
hayyyyyyyyy yeah this karoolzzz hay k hayyyyyyy i remember
0
0
0
0
0
0
7f13679aca2e589a
Good point, thanks. I think I copied the R notation from the covariant derivative article without thinking about it. I want to add a brief section on parallel transport (since I've now mentioned it in the opening sentence) and then I'll roll it out. Thanks for the encouragement and tips.
0
0
0
0
0
0
7f14c7b3325b0d16
Thanks Hi, I saw your additions to the Maronite Church article. The overview section is very helpful but it would be even better if you cited your sources to avoid editors from contesting the passages. I hope you don't think of me as snooty but I'm having rather an unpleasant experience with POV motivated editors who make editing here a miserable experience and the only way to make things more transparent is to reference every passage. Kind regards. (talkallam)
0
0
0
0
0
0
7f17646270263b15
(typing very slowly) Halle Berry herself had to come out and correct this rumor in an interview, which was linked to. RUMORS tend to start on places like message boards and word of mouth. The reason why there is no direct link to any reputable sources is because...still with me?...it was a rumor. Yet it was a big enough rumor for Halle to have to defend.
0
0
0
0
0
0
7f179c2836b1a508
are you stupid? will you fucking stop removing links from the pages i edit? calling it spam?`commercial?! are you totally mad?! i have heavily edited the pages the link is added to and my site is a crucial source of information on the artists. is this crusade against me fun or what?! i dont get it.
1
0
1
0
1
0
7f21130ec5cf0073
Indian sources have been used by the hundreds on Indophobia article so any Pakistan sources used are neutral and good sources of information if not all Indian sources should be removed that is only fair 109.150.60.235
0
0
0
0
0
0
7f247789bafdab4f
" Again, I am very grateful for the encouragement, but the way that EdJohnston has dealt with the matter (see his talk page for my complaint) simply shows me that mods and admins, in general, have a very biased view towards editors who simply wish to improve the quality of articles... present company excepted. I read with interest the candidate statements for the latest Arbitration Committee Election and one of them, a very senior Wikipedian, summed it up so aptly... ""We must clean our house, lest those who could advise and assist us dismiss Wikipedia as a nest of boobies. We should treat all editors alike. The best way to avoid being called a flock of juvenile loons is to stop acting like a flock of juvenile loons."" Sadly, it is clear that prejudice and bias against some classes of contributors exists, and that the level of training, education and the ability to logically examine a conflict is woefully missing. It is inherently skewed. Although Ed has suggested referring the matter to the next level, it is clear, reading through all the Help pages, that Wiki has so many layers of arbitration, the complaint simply gets lost in the ensuing debate, and it then comes down to who is who in the Wiki org chart. The strap line that Wikipedia is the encyclopaedia that can be edited by ANYONE is a pie in the sky dream...it simply isn't true, as has been proven here. Looking through the dispute archives, there are tens of thousands of cases. Is it really worth it when more energy is expended in resolving obvious errors, and condoning poor attitude towards newbies, than in improving the site? So no, it can't be edited by anyone, it can only be edited by people who are approved, mates with other mods, or who make up false accusations and allegations against those who stand up to their incoherent and inaccurate edits. Quite sad really, as it could be quite good. But when there are people, like I've just encountered, who show no subject knowledge, logic, reasonableness, tolerance of new editors, and then blatantly lie to mods, to try and dig themselves out of their self-created holes, is it any wonder that people are leaving Wikipedia in droves (reading through complaint articles!)? I came onto Wiki to contribute a few small lines to an article, about which I know an immense amount (I've been an RCVS patient for thirty plus years and have read the lot). But, the arrogance, unwelcome attitude, and air of ""keep off MY article"" by a self-proclaimed (but unverified) medical 'expert' does little to encourage collation of information, let alone in the collaborative manner in which it is supposed to develop. At best, the experience of contributing to Wikipedia is eye-opening; at worst it is frankly shocking, and an almost bully-the-newbies-off mentality against anyone new who 'dares' to try and contribute. So, I wish you the best with it, but it is not the sort of self-grandising ego-centric cesspit of nastiness, and unnecessary argument that I wish to be a part. And do feel free to communicate this note to the upper echelons as yet another typical day in the life of a newbie contributor. Maybe, they may take note, but I doubt it very much, after all, too much ego is at stake in a majority of cases. Cheers! )"
0
0
0
0
0
0
7f2a595b09bea490
As for Satyam,i apologize for it but try to be polite please,i am only 16 please man!!
0
0
0
0
0
0
7f2c8a88ba4574c9
" October 2008 Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.  Talk | Contribs  If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings."
0
0
0
0
0
0
7f2cf6ac17d6c880
don't vandalize wikipedia articles. K 23:36, Apr 3, 2005 (UTC)
0
0
0
0
0
0
7f2dad432eb30098
Oh yes now I see it. Now I understand why they use his old username. Five years hence and still things remain the same.
0
0
0
0
0
0
7f38f844a3bff370
" Your submission at Articles for creation Your article submission has been declined, and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Finch Himself was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to resubmit once the issues have been addressed. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Cham "
0
0
0
0
0
0
7f3dbe7cb13e1d21
Re: Daft Punk The names are there to clarify which person is in each helmet. This is also the standard for captions of photos featuring a band.
0
0
0
0
0
0
7f4c0d19cab4fdeb
Regarding the files you added to Neon Trees Hello, I'm Novusuna. I understand that you are editing on behalf of the band Neon Trees, and have added some photos to their article at their request. First, thank you for admitting upfront that you are editing on behalf of a group. Second, I just want to make sure that the files you have uploaded are in fact your own work, as claimed on the image description pages. Files uploaded to Wikipedia must have accurate sourcing and copyright information, and if the images are non-free, they must have a fair use justification. I just want to make sure that you're following our policies and guidelines. Happy editing! talk
0
0
0
0
0
0
7f51ca164e53af04
" Hi, I've been checking articles that were edited by Talk "
0
0
0
0
0
0
7f542fb1db05771c
" Best New Artist How could Amy Winehouse win ""Best New Artist"" if this is her second album? "
0
0
0
0
0
0
7f54bdc612d2bb8c
editors who have reverted without just cause or used numerical superiority to revert pages without discussion
0
0
0
0
0
0
7f557681b42329e3
Despicable Me No, of course the creators do not say that Gru resembles Grimly Feendish. But look the pictures on the wiki page and it's obvious, in the same way that Feendish resembles Fester from the Addams family. This is not a criticism, merely an observation and should stand.
0
0
0
0
0
0
7f5b8eb12c1f598e
For people familiar with the background for these articles, it's easy to figure out the notability, because you just know. The problem with the articles is that in themselves, they don't really have much by way of explaining why they are notable or how come they are verifiable, as per policy. So no matter who does it or what you think of any particular nominator, sooner or later these pages will be back on articles for deletion, unless they get improved. In the case of PZFUN, in fact he has many featured articles under his belt. He also got slandered by Siegenthaler on national television and held his ground. I'm pretty convinced of this gentlemans maturity. I linked to several pages where he has been attacked above, and he's been attacked on AFD, of course.
0
0
0
0
0
0
7f5df6a75bb6e6dc
, Second voyage of James Cook, Third voyage of James Cook.
0
0
0
0
0
0
7f62e8915846ab9f
I have commented objectively on what I have seen in the article and this is intended to be helpful. I see no reason for you to interpret this as anything other than constructive and helpful.
0
0
0
0
0
0
7f63c015dc5b2e3a
Nonsense page. Look mister lucky one, I know that you take youre job seriously, because you don't seem to have any life, blocking page at 23 o,clock. But if page like, Ricer, WTF, STFU, many other you know them, If those page exist we should agree that people somewhere were not sharing youre distinction of non-sense, if there is nonsense somewere is calling my page vandalism but cheering a page call STFU. Don't you think mister lucky one??
1
0
0
0
0
0
7f658b9d64e2f19c
" It appears as though Singer didn't reveal all that needed to be said, he sat down with Empire Magazine to tell them that Rogue is not cut out of the film, and reiterates that some of her remaining scenes that were cut from the film might be released on the DVD version of the film. Here's the quote: ""It does not mean that we won't see her in the film. Also, I hope to make the sequence available on the DVD as she was quite wonderful in it."" Here's the official source. 71.188.16.34 "
0
0
0
0
0
0
7f6c52d763badf29
Ok, buddy! im rally getting pissed. i was going to donate 1k to wikipedia but now i think ill just go by some more stuff for me! you are being a real dick man! your deleting random articals TAGED with editing! you my frined are an ignorant ass!
1
0
1
0
1
0
7f700b50bd3a3cfd
Unverified claim I can't find a source for this statement, but I'll leave it here. If anyone else can find a source, feel free to add it. Thanks.
0
0
0
0
0
0
7f77bebc487e1e9a
BTW, my bro just beat the game: 7 Game hours approx. (Sound Off)
0
0
0
0
0
0
7f79c5ae34245451
hi. i just want to ask a question. can a phone that supports freq. gsm 850/1900 be used in a country like nigeria that uses gsm 900/1800?
0
0
0
0
0
0
7f8025de3bc13789
sigh*. people always forget this. it doesn't matter how much bits a system had, it depends in what year it was released in. the eras are based on the dominant bits the majority of the home consoles used
0
0
0
0
0
0
7f824fa10eb3136c
I don't know which part of BIO1E; can you refer it to me?
0
0
0
0
0
0
7f89c20f15b1fde7
" I don't know how you can relate the Indochina War with propaganda of the deed, I doubt it was an anarchist who killed the general, probably just a nationalist. ""Propaganda of the deed"" is not a synonym of ""bombing"" nor of ""assassination"", it is an expression related to the anarchist movement. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
7f8de96af9d1f8ec
" Hi, I think I was weak support on your last RFA because your CSD work needed improvement. I've had a look through the recent stuff and yes I'm happy with the improvement. ''SpielChequers'' "
0
0
0
0
0
0
7f906affd7391d66
Please see Wikipedia:Picture tutorial. And please sign your comments with ~~~~. Thanks. (tlk) (cntrbtns)
0
0
0
0
0
0
7f93345c634b68f9
Hello and thanks for your feedback. I could not find any studies done on this technique nor any significant critiques.( )
0
0
0
0
0
0
7f938400a1a964e5
The article is rubbish, but it's not wrong to describe him as a fascist - or at least he became one.
1
0
0
0
0
0
7f95b5cd9525ff8e
Well if that's the rules you better take down the double platinum certification on We Can't Stop too because her latest database appearance is Party In the USA...(as well as Hold On We're Going Home and the platinum certification for Nothing Was the Same)
0
0
0
0
0
0
7f97cec56ab7a297
Modular Equipment Transporter Dear , I noticed that when you edited the Modular Equipment Transporter article, you said it was carried on Apollo 13. However, I cannot find any confirmation of that; indeed, everything I find says the MET was developed for Apollo 14. I would suggest removing this without any sources. Thank you.
0
0
0
0
0
0
7f9e84610ff5f704
":The POINT, wiki, is that you ""invite others"" to see your point of view, but you refuse to see theirs. It's one sided. You want an example? This nice Buu thing. I point out to you that Super Buu w/ Gohan tried to unmake all of reality (which would have been the most drastic action in the history of the series), would have destroyed the planet had Vegetto not blocked one of his attacks, and was going to blow it up anyway to ""celebrate his omnipotence"" after absorbing Vegetto, and that this behavior is just as bad as Kid Buu's or Super Buu's (arguably worse since Super Buu has more intelligence and reasoning and still behaves this way). And what do you do? You claim noone's made a point against you.. You can't even dispute that evidence because it's clear as day, actions taken within the series that's easy to verify. And your evidence against? He gave Goku 5 seconds to fuse with Mr. Satan, and he let Goku and Vegeta launch attacks that he knew would't hurt him. Well I claim that we've given YOU a chance to see OUR point of view, and since you refuse to try and see this, and have had more than your two chances, we will continue to fight YOUR ignorance until justice is served. "
0
0
0
0
0
0
7fa0e09690146ee4
I was just wonderin if you could answer me a question. I don't really understand the deal with the photos and all that goes with them. I mean, this whole site is a basic free for all and anyone and everyone can do anything and everything to it. So why is it that when someone adds a photo to it, they've got to get permission to use it. Now myself I look at this as a waste of time because of the simple fact that there are a zillion photos of anything and everything out there that people use. As long as you are giving credit to where you got it, I don't see the big deal. Now that is the same thing with anything and everything that is on this site. If you the powers that be want to be so picky about photos, why aren't they picky about the information that people put in the entries. I mean, I've gone on to some people's bios and shows and have seen things literally plagiarized, word for word from one source or another. I'm just really curious why they are so stingent about some things but not others. If you could help me out and answer some of these things or if there is someone who might be able to, I would appreciate it. If you could, please contact me at [email protected] instead of replying here since I only come on here every so often. Thanks Charley
0
0
0
0
0
0
7fa29f75781b3642
and that's why you will get banned, for revert vandalism. -
0
0
0
0
0
0
7fa318391ec3d304
" Why should I ""assume good faith"" from someone adding anti-Semitic lies to an article? Your obvious ignorance on the subject is not an excuse."
0
0
0
0
0
0
7fa70300d2c07461
Please restore my most recent edit, and add source tags where you think they are needed.
0
0
0
0
0
0
7fa75952fe37ad16
" Hi, Pompous Ass! ;) I know you think you're some kind of poker authority on Wikipedia, and that it's somehow your perogative to give the Imperial final thumbs up or thumbs down on what's acceptable regarding anything to do with poker here, but guess what? That's not the case. You are one of MANY arrogant, conceited, self-absorbed losers that populate Wikipedia who use this site as some sort of self-esteem builder, because here you can act like a ""big man"", and make unilateral decisions on what's acceptable or unacceptable here. The edits I have made (and will continue to make) on the Jack Straus entry regarding his death doesn't violate policy in ANY way. If I had the time or the inclination, I could spend several months quoting entries and instances on Wikipedia where editorial verbiage is used. You are simply a pompous ass who thinks you are the gatekeeper of anything poker-related on Wikipedia. You are not, and you will not censor me. And as I'm sure you've already realized, my ISP address constantly changes, so you won’t be able to block me, either. So piss off. ;)"
1
0
1
0
1
0
7fa7a1d0585f389a
Nope Another bot for the impostors list...... I think thats 20 now
0
0
0
0
0
0
7faa8c2fd98a33a4
" The only other option to ""evisceration"" might be to take the entire thing back to userspace until it is completed. Would that be better for you, D? Somehow I doubt it. BTW, you will be pleased to hear that I have been developing one of your stubs. Not much because of source limitations, but a bit nonetheless - Green Leaves. - "
0
0
0
0
0
0