tasksource/jigsaw_toxicity · Datasets at Hugging Face

id stringlengths 16 16	comment_text stringlengths 6 5k	toxic int64 0 1	obscene int64 0 1	insult int64 0 1	identity_hate int64 0 1
914a0e447ba5c617	" Fuck you, you piece of shit The facts are pretty fucking clear. I am the funniest and best writer ever. All this shit about vandalism stems from some kind of sexual insecurity by yourself. Go and die. I hope that you meet with an ""accident"" involving a rusty knife and a double glazed window salesman. Seriously, you're a cunt. It would be no exaggeration to say that I postively loathe you. "	1	1	1	0
914c83a2232476cb	Um..why don't you actually read the article Jakew, it's not based off a single study, the CDC claims it is based off YEARS of studieS! Please stop edit warring. The CDC is reputable. Please, let's not have this again. Facts are facts jakew. 70.114.38.167	0	0	0	0
914f76a368953ab2	" Australian federal election, 1901 I thought you might like to know that the pendulum you added has had removal attempted. You may wish to contribute to talkpage discussion. Jackie Trad Errr, well, it might be kind of skating close to original research, use of unreliable social media, etc... but she mentioned it was her birthday on 25 April twice on Twitter, and the Courier Mail said she was 40 on 7 April, so I kind of worked it out from that. I'll remove it if you're not comfortable with it, I'm happy to wait for a firm independent source such as a parliamentary bio. Wow! You've done all the federal by-elections... love your work! I honestly never thought australian politics on wikipedia would develop to what it is today. It is now done federally, I wonder if wikipedia will ever reach the point of having an article for every state election, every state by-election, and every state MP. A barnstar for you! The Original Barnstar For your work on Australian politicians! Melbourne state by-election, 2012 and Australian Christians I don't suppose you'd like to do the honours? ) I'll try to get something of value on these guys together this weekend. I remember having an attempt back when they were first registered with the AEC, but I had a lot of difficulty working out exactly what their relationship with the CDP was (they seem to be what used to be the Victorian branch of the CDP, with possibly several others, still affiliated with them somehow). Hopefully there's some more info around now, especially with this by-election in the works. (I had a look at the by-election page and fixed up the candidates table a little - it was listing candidates of the Democrats, Secular Party and SEP, none of which are registered in Victoria. I have noticed, though, that Antony has started listing unregistered parties in much the same way as registered ones, so this will be worth keeping an eye on in the future.) Thanks! Colours and images in member list pages What's the logic behind adding these? Looks like a lot of work for something that, well, hurts my eyes... Talkback Sutherland Shire Careful - you're reverting vandalism back into the article! Presumably unintentional? 60.241.63.163 Note: yes, I was, mistakenly. Division of Boothby a) Why put the parentheses around ""Sir""? b) With ""John McLeay, Sr."" and ""John McLeay, Jr."", it was clear they were two different people, and clear they were related. With your changes, this is no longer clear. Your thoughts? Cheers, Hi! After a brief note at WT:AUP (where I hardly ever get responses any more, so I didn't wait that long) I've been implementing these ""Sirs"" in the member lists. With regards to Boothby - I'm glad you brought that up! It was one of the only ones I trouble with. If you'd prefer	0	0	0	0
915087f17f526d46	" I'm got that one watchlisted. (Talk) "	0	0	0	0
9153357c1d572238	" Still welcome ) Love that wikimedia software and edit conflicts! Chat "	0	0	0	0
91538d2225ad327a	"::I wrote a large part of the article, and it is closely watched by highly informed experts on the period who only use, like myself, RS. and you infer that I am describing myself as a ""highly informed expert"" on Al Husseini, Okay. I guess half the problemn is that you clearly haven't a strong grasp on the English grammar, and therefore do not understand often what people are writing. 'experts on the period who only use, like myself, RS' means I exclude myself from being 'a highly informed expert on al-Husseini' (unlike say Pluto and Zero, or even Greyshark). Since this is obviously the sense, and you fail to see it, it's probable that language difficulties account for your repeated apparent refusal to see the point. Perhaps that is why you have for the third time, failed to respond to both what Zero and I have asked, and simply repeated your position. It's no fault if you cannot understand what is asked of you in a foreign language. It is a fault if you persist in reciting a set piece about what you think in the face of repeated requests for policy-based arguments. It's called WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT "	0	0	0	0
9159710ec0ad6d0e	The times are correct, mr. neanderthal.	0	0	0	0
91682c836536c1b9	Please,do not convert this page in a linguistics page.Please,go back to Kwami redaction ,without repetitions and good English.Please,add my own slight corrections of errors to Kwami redaction.Thank you	0	0	0	0
916877f93fa89263	" On the term Azeri See that section of my full article on this. Overall, the formation of Azerbaijani-Turkish ethnic group is from the 13th-16th century. But the USSR usage of Azerbaijani was not clear. The ethnonym ""Azerbaijani"" though is very recently and dates back to the early 20th or late 19th century. In some sources, ""Azerbaijani"" is used to refef to any modern inhabitant of the republic while ""Azeri"" is the ethnic term meaning Azeri-Turk As noted by Oliver Roy: “The concept of Azeri identity barely appears at all before 1920. Up until that point Azerbaijan had been a purely geographical area. Before 1924, the Russians called Azeri Tatars ""Turk"" or ""Muslims"".(Roy, Oliver. “The new Central Asia: The Creation of Nations”). According to Prof. Tadeusz Swietochovski: ""Azerbaijani"" was coined in the 1930s to refer to the inhabitants of the Soviet republic of Azerbaijan.(Azerbaijan Seven Years of Conflict Nagorno-Karabagh – Human Rights Watch / Helsinki– December 1994 by Human Rights Watch). So a historical article should not have anachronistic terms. According to the multi-volume book “History of the East” (“Transcaucasia in XI-XV centuries” in Rostislav Borisovich Rybakov (editor), History of the East. 6 volumes. v. 2. “East during the Middle Ages: Chapter V., 2002. – ISBN 5-02-017711-3. http://gumilevica.kulichki.com/HE2/he2510.htm ) What did the USSR mean by Azerbaijani? Since the ethnonym Azerbaijani for an ethnic group was new, the USSR era did not provide a clear definition. For example some considered Azerbaijanis to be Medes, others as Turks and others as Caucasian Albanians. Then there was theories combining some or all of these. This is another reason why calling Nezami Ganjavi as “Azerbaijani” in the politicized USSR sources lacks clarity. Do they mean Medes(and the descendant of Iranic Medes like Talysh, Kurds?), or Caucasian Albanians or Turks and etc. For example Bolukbashi mentions(Susha Bolukbashi, ‘Nation building in Azerbaijan: The Soviet Legacy and the Impact of the Karabakh Conflict’ in Van Schendel, Willem(Editor) . Identity Politics in Central Asia and the Muslim World: Nationalism, Ethnicity and Labour in the Twentieth Century. London , GBR: I. B. Tauris & Company, Limited, 2001.): Arya Wasserman notes(Aryeh Wasserman, “A Year of Rule by the Popular Front of Azerbaijan” in Yaacov Roi, “Muslim Eurasia”, Routeldge, 1995. pp 150-152.): {{cquote\|The growing interest in the nationalities problem and the rising influence of the ideology of Turkism revived the old controversy over the ethnogenesis of the Azerbaijani people, tha	0	0	0	0
9168ecffeda30f71	,Khoikhoi and EdJohnston has taken side in this dispute.	0	0	0	0
916e1bd3b86895c1	Banned In light of the evidence of your misdeeds and the overwhelming support for banning you at WP:CSN, you have blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia.	0	0	0	0
9179efed2a97f1b5	" I recommend your friend join in the discussion at Talk:Gustavo Cerati#Infobox / Notable Instruments. I doubt this is vandalism since the IP is using an edit summary. It looks more like an editorial dispute about to escalate into an edit war. (talk • contribs) "	0	0	0	0
917aa70db815983e	" How can we presuppose that Michel Aoun enjoys the support of more than 70% of the population when the last election results of 2005 prove that statistic wrong and no comprehensive polling of the Christian population has ever been conducted? This is speculative at best (and perhaps too optimistic, again, according to 2005 election results). Also, Michel Aoun's knowledge of Italian and Spanish is paltry at best, so that should be put into question as well. In addition, no mention of Aoun's ""poor parents"" has ever been made, unless you assume that having a butcher for a father is an unquestionable characteristic of poverty and low-class. Also, as reference to his tenure as prime minister from 1988 to 1990, I propose adding an ""acting"" in parentheses after the prime minister title, as the Lebanese Constitution briefs that only a Sunni Muslim may hold that position (or we should precise that his tenure was an exception or an anomaly, once again for the reason listed earlier)."	0	0	0	0
917d85d378cd42be	" The Native American Race is the Superior Race! You should all watch ""Incident at Oglala: The Leonard Peltier Story"" and should start listening to ""Rage Against The Machine"", ""Pink Floyd"", ""Guns N' Roses"", ""Eric Clapton"", ""Bob Marley & The Wailers"", ""Led Zeppelin"", ""Bob Seger & The Silver Bullet Band"", and ""Willie Nelson""."	0	0	0	0
9180e7246f4b636d	" ==== I just noticed that you unblocked Netoholic without letting me know or even noting this on his talk page. Please explain how I'm an ""involved party."" My only involvement in this dispute has been to respond to Netoholic's flagrant misconduct. I've never edited these templates or their talk pages. Please also explain why Netoholic's decision to deliberately restore harmful code (condemned by lead developer Brion Vibber) to a namespace from which he's banned, after he was explicitly warned not to do so, does not warrant a block. — "	0	0	0	0
91823da11b78ffda	This locamotive was the inspiration for Rusty!	0	0	0	0
91825b2ce951f8a0	" I strongly urge you to report this on ANI, instead of edit-warring, if you are intending to do so. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} "	0	0	0	0
918747ca1ebc96c8	Shut the hell up. (	1	0	0	0
918c8ac20d86173c	I disagree. I think this is worthy of a seperate article. What is with you people and merging or deleting shit anyway?	1	0	0	0
918ffe6892bbba44	" Very interesting. I do remember that it was an odd edit that someone had made, but one sees so many weird tricks and edits by vandals that I'm never surprised any more... '''''' (Talk) "	0	0	0	0
9198f49d764e67bb	Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. Such edits are considered vandalism and quickly undone. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. (♀)	0	0	0	0
9199bbf77d496a74	" Maintainability should not trump the presentation. If you want to be able to accurately update the article FIFA.com or CONCACAF.com will do just fine. .Alpaugh "	0	0	0	0
919abeb09bc8e44c	" The extent of your homophobic ignorance is genuinely startling. It has been clear from the outset that you have no contact with the academic world, but even informed laypersons are aware that ""Queer Studies"" is a standard term for scholarly programs at many universities, and that ""queer"" is a term of choice by many individuals with same-sex lifestyle preferences. Your preposterous statement that ""gay encyclopedias are not considered an authoritative source here"" is simply laughable. Your personal hatreds and phobias are your own problem, ""Jack,"" and are not a basis for censoring this article. If you have an issue with the encyclopedia GBLTQ as a source, you should deal with it at the relevant Wikipedia article, glbtq.com. I have once again restored the ""Sexuality"" section. If you deface it again, I will refer your homophobic vandalism to Wikipedia's LGBT Project. "	0	0	0	0
919cc7186780d1ee	NOTE: If you are writing on my page because of a revert I may have done, please give me details about the revert rather than just a template. There's a strong chance that was an accident. \|- \|	0	0	0	0
919cfaf2429bc5e6	" — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) 2 January 2016, 19:53 (UTC) According to History's copyright page, the content that you added is most certainly NOT public domain. Sources must directly support claims and the source page that you provided does not support the conetnt that I mentioned. (✉) ‎"	0	0	0	0
91a199f858183f76	wtf? this aint me! who the fuck used ma ip?!	1	1	0	0
91a27ed27adc7481	" Frank, thanks for your message, and for not flying off the handle, as is often the response when people see their additions deleted. What we need for this information to be included is not just evidence that the town really exists, but that John Nichols had that town in mind when he wrote the novel. If you can find the long essay Nichols wrote about the novel and its adaptation into the film, that might help. I have looked for it, but to no avail. Cheers! -''''''The '45 "	0	0	0	0
91a5a41e1d507026	It is not copy paste or unsourced the article is on it's headline, it was vandalised before.	0	0	0	0
91a8f40c7e7ebff3	What are you talking about? There is a source!!!!!	0	0	0	0
91b0f74ebac8fda6	Thank you. I hope this edit warring will not escalate any further. Greetings.	0	0	0	0
91b393fde1fd9971	":::Hi Milo. Did you know I kind of like this band ? It's ok. Anyhow, I am grateful for all your help and support, you are a good guy. Respect. You probably do not want to associate with me (just look at my talk page) at this moment. Especially not smart would be to state ""you are in my cabal"". I am my own idiot, an island. I do not yet know what I will do, the band name above really boils my blood, but I will probably get bored and move on. We'll just have to see....127 "	0	0	0	0
91b63cd88ba59720	I think we should keep the Ulbricht article and drop this one. In case you didn't notice, Ulbricht is a real person, whereas Dread Pirate Roberts, the Silk Road version, is second-hand fictional pseudonym. Second-hand fictional pseudonym don't usually appear as entries in encyclopedias.	0	0	0	0
91b65a7e87e3fa3d	So how about the ones I suggested in the Talk Page? I really think that images like the one of Shego using her powers and at least one of her figthing Kim should be there.	0	0	0	0
91b6f71f964f3cf5	" Capitalization Am I missing something here? Why is only the first letter of the first word in the section headings capitalized? It is not the beginning of a sentence, and I have never heard of a grammatical convention that would allow for the primary words of any title, the title of a section in this case, to begin with a lowercase letter. A quick look at ""The Chicago Manual of Style"" provides not relief in this matter, so is this just a case of bad grammar?"	0	0	0	0
91bcd540dbb43974	============D - (your face)	0	0	0	0
91bef6d251fb3305	" Speedy deletion of Jennifer Tinsley-Williams A tag has been placed on Jennifer Tinsley-Williams requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, ""See also"" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. hangon Jennifer Tinsley-Williams is redirected to New York City Ballet's 2.3 Soloists of which she is one. — "	0	0	0	0
91bf57e206d65519	" Talkback NaSpVe \| "	0	0	0	0
91cba85455239e83	Cool, thanks for picking this one up, I look forward to your review. All the best,	0	0	0	0
91ce26f5a25b358f	Hello, my article about Ryan Sheridan has been rated as C-class. How can I improve the article? I have recently added Ryan's year of birth.	0	0	0	0
91cf130ffb233151	Public reaction? == It sort of baffles me that I can't find much commentary on what was the public reaction to the riots? A billion in property damages, tens of people dead, and not a single famous/notable individual had anything to say about it, a human behaviour analyst or somesuch critisize the rioting or on the other end of the scale, someone praise it? ==	0	0	0	0
91d1d39df56ed9cb	The book has it as 15 days; I assumed since it had 7 there, the movie had seven. I will change seven to two.	0	0	0	0
91d461f98eb6da02	What Serbo-Croatian dialect says what as šta?	0	0	0	0
91d4c6886582f5e6	" Hi - I see you have recently created one or more new stub types. As it states at Wikipedia:Stub, at the top of most stub categories, and in many other places on Wikipedia, it is recommended that new stub types are proposed prior to creation at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, in order to check whether the new stub type is already covered by existing stub types, whether it is named according to stub naming guidelines, whether it is otherwise correctly formatted, whether it reaches the standard threshold for creation of a new stub type, and whether it crosses existing stub type hierarchies. Your new stub type is currently listed at WP:WSS/D - please feel free to make any comments there as to any rationale for this stub type. And please, in future, consider proposing new stub types first! ...wha? "	0	0	0	0
91db3a74c3d213df	" John i respect your comments, but it obviouse that they dont like oppisiton to themm thats the basic problem, but nonwe of them will say it. Why dont you just admit that you are just supporting you other admins, of coure i cant go and ""complain"" becuas i am sitting behind block that only goes to prove a piont, which if i am correct is aginst ""policy"". And no i will not create another this it the account that i use and this is the account that i will continue to use, and you can tell your firends likr User:UninvitedCompany that his comments are uncivil, and that his comment is agnist policy and that i would expect that you would block him if you were fair, but since he is part of the problem i doubt that he be blocked or let alone be warned for uncivility. \| trácht ar "	0	0	0	0
91df212ee279d38f	REDIRECT Talk:Woke Up This Morning and Found Myself Dead	0	0	0	0
91e4a046a6660906	Sources? This article should provide sources, preferrably online ones. If some vanal comes here and changes a numbre there's only small chance to verify. 14:35, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)	0	0	0	0
91eb334e996cff67	I want you to restore it if you are going to leave the rest of it. You have no right to edit my talk on this page.	0	0	0	0
91f4482c476147e3	"Hi, I notice you've relisted Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/V.V.L.N.Sastry‎. Per WP:DEL - ""A nomination that gets little response after the discussion period has ended can be relisted"" - the discussion period still has one day to go and it's not lacking responses! Just wondered if you're aware of exceptions or other policies covering this that I'm not? "	0	0	0	0
91f58cbef27e7ff5	I had not seen that you had made a new response on the GA review page. It is not on my watchlist, as I was not its nominator. However, as it appears that I have been the one who has been making the fixes I will remedy it. Additionally, I will be busy with work for the next couple days so I maybe slower in responding than I was before; sorry in advance for my tardiness.	0	0	0	0
91f791ca7ea19a8b	YOU SUCK YOU SUCK, CANADIAN BACON, YOU SCUMMY HOCKEY PLAYING, BIG NOSED, 'DONT YA KNOW' SAYIN FAG	1	1	1	1
91faf751f7975152	" Clarification needed - Run in with Tom Pettigrew after shooting her brother According to the Wiki article, under ""Brother's shooting"": ""...later pointing the weapon at a moving vehicle on the adjacent road, trying to get into the vehicle...."" Does the above have anything to do with this? It doesn't seem so to me. Here's a snippet of the article: Carrying a shotgun by her side, a 21-year-old Bishop walked intently across a car lot into the adjacent storefront, where she began searching for car keys. Coming down from the second floor, she was heading toward the garage when she ran into Tom Pettigrew and a friend, who had spotted her in the parking lot and came to investigate. ""Her gun hit me in the chest,"" Pettigrew, 45, recalled from his Quincy apartment. ""I yelled, 'What are you doing?' and she screamed at me to put my hands up. So I put my hands up."" But the Braintree police chief has cast doubt on that conclusion [that she accidentally killed her brother], and the armed confrontation at the garage provides new insight into her state of mind after her brother's death. The Boston Herald first reported Pettigrew's account of the events today. Only minutes after that shooting, according to Pettigrew, Bishop frantically told workers at the garage she had been in an argument with her husband and needed a car to escape, nervously scanning the premises as she kept the gun pointed at their backs. So, my question is did this Pettigrew incident happen before or after she pointed the weapon at a moving vehicle? In other words, what's the time line? Thanks. "	0	0	0	0
91fbf583b62f7414	Sign your fucking comments! 80.192.32.85	1	1	0	0
9204f105fdc3193f	Thanks for your kind words and I do hope that it passes for me too. Unfortunately, every time I attempt to criticize what I feel are portions of the project which are what I feel to be out of place I personally get attacked. Not to mention just ugh, there are aspects which I absolutely hate and cannot change, and certain editors who make my editing hell. This is the longest time I've been discouraged about Wikipedia, and I sincerely hope it'll pass too.	0	0	0	0
9206437fa400a909	(and permanantly from the chat room by Kelly's friend )	0	0	0	0
9208d500a75d3e29	Spanish people from Latinamerica Some Mexican editors seem to consider that 9 to 15 million people in Mexico are ethnically Spanish. To support this they offer: a Tour operator page about tourism in Mexico: roughly as unreliable as it gets. But even worse... a link to the Encyclopaedia Britannica which simply does not have anything even remotely similar to the 9 to 15 million claim. However, all that is not the real problem. The real problem is this: what have all those millions to be counted as ethnically Spanish? Note that we alrady had a discussion in About Regions with significant populations, where there was an agreement to erase the figures of Spanish people based exclusively on presumed ancestry and white race. If the reason to include someone as part of the Spanish people is simply ancestry, the amount for Mexico and other Latinamerican countries would probably get near 100% of the population... rather preposterous. If the reason are cultural traits, then we should know which are those traits, how they are different between individuals and what statistics we have about them. If the reason is whatever I can't think of, please enlighten me! I really would like to know if a conversation like this is common in Mexico: Hello, I'm Juan, I'm a Mexican of Spanish ethnicity. Hello, I'm Pedro, I'm a Spanish Mexican too! How nice, we have the same ethnicity, let's throw a celebration!	0	0	0	0
92097eddfce97b5b	I didn't think it was an improvement.	0	0	0	0
9219b7f8d46d34ae	Wikistalker and sock puppet Lay off. I will have recourse. You are not immune. Stan	1	0	0	0
922bcaf44059004e	Note to User:Becritical This article is not a legitimate target for removal without discussion. Moreover, for an article about a book, the book itself is always a legitimate source, and need not be cited as such; the Internet Speculative Fiction database (listed under external links) is also a legitimate source. Also, please note that if this article was to be removed, the proper redirect would be to L. Sprague de Camp, not Christopher Stasheff.	0	0	0	0
922caf0a7e6d3168	Why am I blocked? For some reason, i've been blocked and I don't know why.	0	0	0	0
922e5ed7bf422915	" You call MacDonald's a part of your ""culture""? Nonsense! Spend some 10 years in France, and then you will have a hint of what Culture is! "	1	0	0	0
9230b1529fe41777	BLP reminder This is a BLP, and we have to stick very closely to what the reliable sources say. Let me remind people that the recordings are not authenticated; I know of no reliable source that even mentions them let alone claims to have verified that the voice is Tropper's. The allegation about the revoked conversion is just that — an allegation; no reliable source states it as a fact. Even the claim that he was a major player in the Slifkin ban seems to rest mainly on Slifkin's self-published account, which is not a reliable source; I very much doubt that the Jewish Week verified it from an independent source.	0	0	0	0
9234a4eefcdfc266	Probably they do. (Talk)	0	0	0	0
9237b04dfa3d2e8b	" Please cite sources In a recent edit to you said: ""Introduction of info which gave rise to this debate in the first place the whitewashing of Egypt. I'll find some photos or hunt up some links later."" Please don't neglect this. "	0	0	0	0
92391e6383fd648c	I forgot to log on with my username, I corrected my mistake when addressing Marcus, I honestly don't see what the problem is, I don't use that Anon IP on wikipedia so its not a sockpuppet of me. Anyway Dick in that context refers to Don't be a Dick, if you had bothered to do your homework you would have known that, one could label Wiki:dick in this case as personal attack but personal attacks are not vandalism, so get your facts straight.	0	1	0	0
923c19c7155d5d39	, Thanks all. I'm not surprised. I was going to come back to this to try to find something better, but the lawnmower called. And fix Najran also, right?	0	0	0	0
9241721e10240a61	Discussion at Talk:Bull of Heaven#Genres You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Bull of Heaven#Genres. Thanks. Thank you.	0	0	0	0
924d752aa707f26d	Incidentally, I have a copy of the news clipping of that incident from The Sun newspaper. Instead of throwing your weight around, perhaps you'd like to follow one of the Wikipedia guidelines you are so quick to use when it suits you. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Please_do_not_bite_the_newcomers. You want stuff verified, ask the questions. Show us how to verify. Simply removing or deleting information is always going to get another's back up, something you may learn when you graduate from short pants.	0	0	0	0
924e00cee2965637	" Looking good for the image - the owner of http://flickr.com/photos/telstar/47854252/ says he is a registered Wikipedian himself and will be glad to add the picture to the article himself later today. Maybe even two pictures if we're lucky. That's the first time that happened to me, that I met someone who says ""sure, but why don't I do it myself"". -) (squeak) "	0	0	0	0
925a813e90a7e337	I think this image should stay, at least because its the only image that we have for Selena. If this gets deleted, then there's no image for her article. Thanks,	0	0	0	0
925d4e6436c5afaf	" The ONLY worthwhile candidate. It's true. Gravel is the only presidential candidate not spouting out the usual political BS (as well as Ron Paul). It only figures that he's receiving little to no attention. His accomplishments in the 60's and 70's with the War and the Pentagon Papers trumps the accomplishments of every other candidate, but that scumbag Giuliani is revered for his ""actions"" during 9/11. It's so depressing...ugh. This only justifies my cynicism even more. The majority of Americans are content with accepting the same garbage every election. If Clinton wins, that will mean for 24 years, the most powerful country in the world was controlled by two differen families. Disgusting. "	0	0	0	0
92632695ecdcfdaa	" This happens all the time on Wikipedia. We just leave the link and ref the way it is, I suppose. Sometimes there could be a web archived version to use. talk "	0	0	0	0
92647ad88063386c	New templates for Wikipedians W'Sallam, We need some more templates to be used for people who will be editing Pakistani articles, take a look at the following templates on the Indian Wiki board, if possible can you make some for the Pakistan Wikipedians. Here the link; Template Section We need templates of the following if you can create them; The first four, instead of NRI we need one for expat-Pakistani (i.e. Pakistani living abroad) and the last one (British-Pakistani) and (American-Pakistani) Fast track 07:20 23 March 2006 (UTC)	0	0	0	0
926a65c24209d14b	SimCopter Shenanigans Hiya. I originally followed this controversy in PC Gamer (my god, back when printed magazines were worth a shit), so off the top of m yhead I didn't have any sites. I remember there being a few Geocities webpages on SimCopter, but by the time I had graphical internet (circa 1998) it was already considered an old school game. One page I found while googling that mentions the controversy is http://www.langston.com/Fun_People/1996/1996CFM.html another is http://lists.samurai.com/pipermail/bryans-list/1996-December/001811.html apparently the programmer who inserted this easter egg was fired. Go figure - and here we have people trying to push the view that the Clinton years were all about tolerance. What a load. ANYWAY, before I go off on a political tangent, check out those sites, and I'll try to find some actual SimCopter sites at some point (though I get the feeling this will be a fruitless endeavor)	0	1	0	0
926c58f550dbd23d	, the process would be easier. Politically, LB and I are supposed to be on the same side, so the situation is ridiculous	0	0	0	0
9273a352e05cd02f	AP as sourcing Actually, the AP is perfectly acceptable sourcing for when a statement is accurate or not. They're specifically good at that. Your reversion on those grounds is specious, I am sorry to have to inform you. ?!?	0	0	0	0
9274525ee673f225	Ummmmm, no he hasn't. Go do some research and check back in. Oh, by the way...June 21st, be ready.	0	0	0	0
9275bb72e4e1728a	Justification to add new proof, using Bézout's Identity As requested by , my justifications for adding this new proof to teh article are: While it is equivalent to teh first, it is smaller and lighter to read. It emphasizes teh that	0	0	0	0
9277bfba5d028e11	List of Haitians Thanks for all your great entries! You are truly helpful. I am not Haitian but feel that they should getter coverage than the bad press they get. The list of Haitians is a step forward. Once again, thank you!	0	0	0	0
927c480151c147cb	" There is no difference in rhetoric. The quote that Jayjg took out of context was a citation from the Qur'an that Hamas uses (also out of context) to justify the killing of Jews. Zionists use similar tactics (that's where Hamas learned it) by quoting the Torah and Talmud to justify the killing of non-Jews. ""We must treat the Arabs like the Amalekites"" is a common sentiment among extremist Zionists. There are quotes from Zionist rabbis on this page that are indistinguishable from the logic of Hamas clerics. The denial of Zionism's genocidal intent and practice is similar to Nazis who denied the Holocaust and Final Solution even as they conducted it. Zionists claim to be ethical and humanitarian while routinely killing hundreds of children, imprisoning thousands of adults and oppressing millions of non-Jews in the name of their Jewish supremacist ideology and state. 02:55, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)"	0	0	0	0
927d095f2a424eff	to give you a citation of th title of it	0	0	0	0
927fa2757bcb79ad	We New pictures to replace the old pictures on the roster= There should be new pictures of the 1993-1994 TMC RTS of 84xx,85xx, and 86xx series, and 1997-1998 and 1999 NOVABus RTS,NYCT 1995 and 1996 Orion V, NYCT 1994-1995 Orion V CNG, Long Island Bus 1997 and 1998 orion V CNG, Ex-PBL 1997 Orion V and 1997-1999 Orion V CNG, C40LFs,NYCT 1998-1999 Orion V,All D60HF,Long Island 2000 and 2004 Orion V CNG and 2002-2004 Orion VII Hyrbid and CNG and Orion VII Next Generation Hyrbid and CNG. We need new pictures on the roster because the old one's are kinda old and there should be new pictures. If you have the time to take picturs of the buses, you should post the new picture and replace the old one on the roster. Thank you. thenovabus	0	0	0	0
9282af9a1a588635	" Aboriginal Australians for one. ☎ "	0	0	0	0
9286c917ae649bec	Well Im not either of them, its my first account & dont believe either Pete Rock, Scoop DeVille or Kanye West should NOT be listed as producers. It doesnt matter if they didnt make the final cut, if they didnt they dont list them. Otherwise, I dont see why your not listing DJ Premier, Pete Rock, Q-Tip or Madlib as producers for Kanye Wests new album.	0	0	0	0
9287569b6356badb	Leave me alone!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LEAVE ME ALONE DO YOU UNDERSTAND ILOVEDIRTBIKES	0	0	0	0
928817ea0cb33d55	I'm sorry, you may have misunderstood me. Please pay attention! thx. I want a sentence adding noting that compiling long lists is of interest to genealogists /// NOT that Wikipedia should host such a list (though FWIW I actually don't see too much of a problem with that either, that's a different discussion).	0	0	0	0
92950c048b77aafd	You might also want to have a look how wikipedia rules say not to include unsourced material! Oh wait you where claiming I did that before, but you put back referenced material I delted, so you know the rule! So why are you breaking it?203.192.91.4	0	0	0	0
92955936b4566544	" You say that Epeefleeche's one sided advocacy on your talk page is ""wikilawyering"" but you have caved in to it and reversed your decision. Now that you have allowed the opinions of this single editor to change the decision reached by consensus at AFD I sincerely hope that you stick to your word and rewrite the ""worthless"" article so that it has some approximation to an encyclopedia article and not simply a propaganda tract as it appears in its current state. "	0	0	0	0
929665eabaf59a62	Spanish immigration or migration? Most of it happenend when Puerto Rico was a Spanish colony, so how can it be immigration? That's like saying if you move from the mainland USA to Puerto Rico, its immigration. And even before the Spanish came, the Tainos had no immigration policies, regulations, or laws in place.	0	0	0	0
9298df499f9d41b4	I need to use that more. I do use it, but I frequently forget when making lots of small edits. I had been thinking that I need to get more done in fewer saves. Is it possible to copy a page to the sandbox, work on it there and then copy the whole thing back into the regular page?	0	0	0	0
929a3e9bc7a419cf	Even in the last edit by 97 on the link you provided, I am called a sockpuppet. My history has shown otherwise! 97 on the other hand even on his CATruthwatcher is deleting old edits on his talk page and on the 97 ip address to hide all the arguments. You don't and won't see me doing that at all. I leave all the old ones on the page. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CAtruthwatcher&diff;=prev&oldid;=397565427 .. CAtruth obviously has a connection to st johns... he wouldn't be so defensive about the school if that weren't the case. So would it be a stretch to say that he doesn't know someone who goes to the school or lives in queens? I'm not saying that 97 did the edit... but I think he had something to do with it.	0	0	0	0
929ea859b5551dee	Yogscast I see u r a yogscast dick rider. F.Y.I it's not vandalism if it's true moron. So quit following me.	1	1	1	0
92a2b216dfeac3bd	Buff Thanks, Burntsauce was driving me mental.	0	0	0	0
92aa7f690fc20708	"Are you REALLY that lazy that you can't be bothered to help? Just because this show doesn't ""exist"" any more. You're too lazy to complete the tables, but you are all for putting stupid templates about how there's not enough. I'm not the only person on Wikipedia, so don't just expect me to do it all, although that's exactly what you ARE expectiing "	1	0	0	0
92ad31c17995f30a	" Hi... I see my userpage's nonsensical MfD is doing just fine...although I wish to clear something up for you. You referred to me as ""he/she"". When someone includes the word ""son"" in their name, it usually means they're male. ) oaP "	0	0	0	0
92addcb3723642ac	" I'm noting here just for the record that creation protected the page. tion9 "	0	0	0	0
92b2c1ac08f2d5a6	" Dabangg After some serious work on prose and references, I believe the article is almost ready to be nominated for GA. Do you want to review it? ''' talk''' "	0	0	0	0
92b494f48e198b51	":::Your claim that the ""soldiers were on their own sovereign territory so they were not 'getting into' anything"" is contested. Israel claims that Hezbollah crossed into Israel killing 8 soldiers, and capturing 2 while the Lebanese claim that the two soldiers were in Lebanon, and that Israeli aircraft were flying over Lebanese airspace when the soldiers were arrested by local police officials. I agree with that the mere status of being a soldier makes you a legitimate target. It seems that you think its okay for Israel to capture and kill members of Hezbollah even though they are civilians but are still a legitimate target but that when Hezbollah captures two Israeli soldiers that they are not a legitimate target. In sum you claim, when Israel captures or kills civilian Lebanese who belong to Hezbollah they are killing or capturing a legitimate enemy target but when Hezbollah captures or kills Israeli soldiers they are not capturing or killing a legitimate enemy target. Again, this is a false dichotomy. And is a clear point of view violation. You also seem to have a predilection towards claiming that your point of view is fact as if ""appealling to the authority"" of fact will grant your point of view a superior position. "	0	0	0	0
92b5889eacb89f57	User:Adam1213/warn> Vandalism warnings	0	0	0	0
92ba8ebd43e175ea	T. K. V. Desikachar My mistake in not mentioning earlier. Please see whether uploading photos as under OK? license ?\|cc-by-sa-2.5	0	0	0	0
92bc55ce64476e3d	My age is almost 57 years old.	0	0	0	0

914a0e447ba5c617

" Fuck you, you piece of shit The facts are pretty fucking clear. I am the funniest and best writer ever. All this shit about vandalism stems from some kind of sexual insecurity by yourself. Go and die. I hope that you meet with an ""accident"" involving a rusty knife and a double glazed window salesman. Seriously, you're a cunt. It would be no exaggeration to say that I postively loathe you. "

1

0

1

0

1

0

914c83a2232476cb

Um..why don't you actually read the article Jakew, it's not based off a single study, the CDC claims it is based off YEARS of studieS! Please stop edit warring. The CDC is reputable. Please, let's not have this again. Facts are facts jakew. 70.114.38.167

0

914f76a368953ab2

" Australian federal election, 1901 I thought you might like to know that the pendulum you added has had removal attempted. You may wish to contribute to talkpage discussion. Jackie Trad Errr, well, it might be kind of skating close to original research, use of unreliable social media, etc... but she mentioned it was her birthday on 25 April twice on Twitter, and the Courier Mail said she was 40 on 7 April, so I kind of worked it out from that. I'll remove it if you're not comfortable with it, I'm happy to wait for a firm independent source such as a parliamentary bio. Wow! You've done all the federal by-elections... love your work! I honestly never thought australian politics on wikipedia would develop to what it is today. It is now done federally, I wonder if wikipedia will ever reach the point of having an article for every state election, every state by-election, and every state MP. A barnstar for you! The Original Barnstar For your work on Australian politicians! Melbourne state by-election, 2012 and Australian Christians I don't suppose you'd like to do the honours? ) I'll try to get something of value on these guys together this weekend. I remember having an attempt back when they were first registered with the AEC, but I had a lot of difficulty working out exactly what their relationship with the CDP was (they seem to be what used to be the Victorian branch of the CDP, with possibly several others, still affiliated with them somehow). Hopefully there's some more info around now, especially with this by-election in the works. (I had a look at the by-election page and fixed up the candidates table a little - it was listing candidates of the Democrats, Secular Party and SEP, none of which are registered in Victoria. I have noticed, though, that Antony has started listing unregistered parties in much the same way as registered ones, so this will be worth keeping an eye on in the future.) Thanks! Colours and images in member list pages What's the logic behind adding these? Looks like a lot of work for something that, well, hurts my eyes... Talkback Sutherland Shire Careful - you're reverting vandalism back into the article! Presumably unintentional? 60.241.63.163 Note: yes, I was, mistakenly. Division of Boothby a) Why put the parentheses around ""Sir""? b) With ""John McLeay, Sr."" and ""John McLeay, Jr."", it was clear they were two different people, and clear they were related. With your changes, this is no longer clear. Your thoughts? Cheers, Hi! After a brief note at WT:AUP (where I hardly ever get responses any more, so I didn't wait that long) I've been implementing these ""Sirs"" in the member lists. With regards to Boothby - I'm glad you brought that up! It was one of the only ones I trouble with. If you'd prefer

0

915087f17f526d46

" I'm got that one watchlisted. (Talk) "

0

9153357c1d572238

" Still welcome ) Love that wikimedia software and edit conflicts! Chat "

0

91538d2225ad327a

"::I wrote a large part of the article, and it is closely watched by highly informed experts on the period who only use, like myself, RS. and you infer that I am describing myself as a ""highly informed expert"" on Al Husseini, Okay. I guess half the problemn is that you clearly haven't a strong grasp on the English grammar, and therefore do not understand often what people are writing. 'experts on the period who only use, like myself, RS' means I exclude myself from being 'a highly informed expert on al-Husseini' (unlike say Pluto and Zero, or even Greyshark). Since this is obviously the sense, and you fail to see it, it's probable that language difficulties account for your repeated apparent refusal to see the point. Perhaps that is why you have for the third time, failed to respond to both what Zero and I have asked, and simply repeated your position. It's no fault if you cannot understand what is asked of you in a foreign language. It is a fault if you persist in reciting a set piece about what you think in the face of repeated requests for policy-based arguments. It's called WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT "

0

9159710ec0ad6d0e

The times are correct, mr. neanderthal.

0

91682c836536c1b9

Please,do not convert this page in a linguistics page.Please,go back to Kwami redaction ,without repetitions and good English.Please,add my own slight corrections of errors to Kwami redaction.Thank you

0

916877f93fa89263

" On the term Azeri See that section of my full article on this. Overall, the formation of Azerbaijani-Turkish ethnic group is from the 13th-16th century. But the USSR usage of Azerbaijani was not clear. The ethnonym ""Azerbaijani"" though is very recently and dates back to the early 20th or late 19th century. In some sources, ""Azerbaijani"" is used to refef to any modern inhabitant of the republic while ""Azeri"" is the ethnic term meaning Azeri-Turk As noted by Oliver Roy: “The concept of Azeri identity barely appears at all before 1920. Up until that point Azerbaijan had been a purely geographical area. Before 1924, the Russians called Azeri Tatars ""Turk"" or ""Muslims"".(Roy, Oliver. “The new Central Asia: The Creation of Nations”). According to Prof. Tadeusz Swietochovski: ""Azerbaijani"" was coined in the 1930s to refer to the inhabitants of the Soviet republic of Azerbaijan.(Azerbaijan Seven Years of Conflict Nagorno-Karabagh – Human Rights Watch / Helsinki– December 1994 by Human Rights Watch). So a historical article should not have anachronistic terms. According to the multi-volume book “History of the East” (“Transcaucasia in XI-XV centuries” in Rostislav Borisovich Rybakov (editor), History of the East. 6 volumes. v. 2. “East during the Middle Ages: Chapter V., 2002. – ISBN 5-02-017711-3. http://gumilevica.kulichki.com/HE2/he2510.htm ) What did the USSR mean by Azerbaijani? Since the ethnonym Azerbaijani for an ethnic group was new, the USSR era did not provide a clear definition. For example some considered Azerbaijanis to be Medes, others as Turks and others as Caucasian Albanians. Then there was theories combining some or all of these. This is another reason why calling Nezami Ganjavi as “Azerbaijani” in the politicized USSR sources lacks clarity. Do they mean Medes(and the descendant of Iranic Medes like Talysh, Kurds?), or Caucasian Albanians or Turks and etc. For example Bolukbashi mentions(Susha Bolukbashi, ‘Nation building in Azerbaijan: The Soviet Legacy and the Impact of the Karabakh Conflict’ in Van Schendel, Willem(Editor) . Identity Politics in Central Asia and the Muslim World: Nationalism, Ethnicity and Labour in the Twentieth Century. London , GBR: I. B. Tauris & Company, Limited, 2001.): Arya Wasserman notes(Aryeh Wasserman, “A Year of Rule by the Popular Front of Azerbaijan” in Yaacov Roi, “Muslim Eurasia”, Routeldge, 1995. pp 150-152.): {{cquote|The growing interest in the nationalities problem and the rising influence of the ideology of Turkism revived the old controversy over the ethnogenesis of the Azerbaijani people, tha

0

9168ecffeda30f71

,Khoikhoi and EdJohnston has taken side in this dispute.

0

916e1bd3b86895c1

Banned In light of the evidence of your misdeeds and the overwhelming support for banning you at WP:CSN, you have blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia.

0

9179efed2a97f1b5

" I recommend your friend join in the discussion at Talk:Gustavo Cerati#Infobox / Notable Instruments. I doubt this is vandalism since the IP is using an edit summary. It looks more like an editorial dispute about to escalate into an edit war. (talk • contribs) "

0

917aa70db815983e

" How can we presuppose that Michel Aoun enjoys the support of more than 70% of the population when the last election results of 2005 prove that statistic wrong and no comprehensive polling of the Christian population has ever been conducted? This is speculative at best (and perhaps too optimistic, again, according to 2005 election results). Also, Michel Aoun's knowledge of Italian and Spanish is paltry at best, so that should be put into question as well. In addition, no mention of Aoun's ""poor parents"" has ever been made, unless you assume that having a butcher for a father is an unquestionable characteristic of poverty and low-class. Also, as reference to his tenure as prime minister from 1988 to 1990, I propose adding an ""acting"" in parentheses after the prime minister title, as the Lebanese Constitution briefs that only a Sunni Muslim may hold that position (or we should precise that his tenure was an exception or an anomaly, once again for the reason listed earlier)."

0

917d85d378cd42be

" The Native American Race is the Superior Race! You should all watch ""Incident at Oglala: The Leonard Peltier Story"" and should start listening to ""Rage Against The Machine"", ""Pink Floyd"", ""Guns N' Roses"", ""Eric Clapton"", ""Bob Marley & The Wailers"", ""Led Zeppelin"", ""Bob Seger & The Silver Bullet Band"", and ""Willie Nelson""."

0

9180e7246f4b636d

" ==== I just noticed that you unblocked Netoholic without letting me know or even noting this on his talk page. Please explain how I'm an ""involved party."" My only involvement in this dispute has been to respond to Netoholic's flagrant misconduct. I've never edited these templates or their talk pages. Please also explain why Netoholic's decision to deliberately restore harmful code (condemned by lead developer Brion Vibber) to a namespace from which he's banned, after he was explicitly warned not to do so, does not warrant a block. — "

0

91823da11b78ffda

This locamotive was the inspiration for Rusty!

0

91825b2ce951f8a0

" I strongly urge you to report this on ANI, instead of edit-warring, if you are intending to do so. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} "

0

918747ca1ebc96c8

Shut the hell up. (

1

0

918c8ac20d86173c

I disagree. I think this is worthy of a seperate article. What is with you people and merging or deleting shit anyway?

1

0

918ffe6892bbba44

" Very interesting. I do remember that it was an odd edit that someone had made, but one sees so many weird tricks and edits by vandals that I'm never surprised any more... '''''' (Talk) "

0

9198f49d764e67bb

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. Such edits are considered vandalism and quickly undone. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. (♀)

0

9199bbf77d496a74

" Maintainability should not trump the presentation. If you want to be able to accurately update the article FIFA.com or CONCACAF.com will do just fine. .Alpaugh "

0

919abeb09bc8e44c

" The extent of your homophobic ignorance is genuinely startling. It has been clear from the outset that you have no contact with the academic world, but even informed laypersons are aware that ""Queer Studies"" is a standard term for scholarly programs at many universities, and that ""queer"" is a term of choice by many individuals with same-sex lifestyle preferences. Your preposterous statement that ""gay encyclopedias are not considered an authoritative source here"" is simply laughable. Your personal hatreds and phobias are your own problem, ""Jack,"" and are not a basis for censoring this article. If you have an issue with the encyclopedia GBLTQ as a source, you should deal with it at the relevant Wikipedia article, glbtq.com. I have once again restored the ""Sexuality"" section. If you deface it again, I will refer your homophobic vandalism to Wikipedia's LGBT Project. "

0

919cc7186780d1ee

NOTE: If you are writing on my page because of a revert I may have done, please give me details about the revert rather than just a template. There's a strong chance that was an accident. |- |

0

919cfaf2429bc5e6

" — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) 2 January 2016, 19:53 (UTC) According to History's copyright page, the content that you added is most certainly NOT public domain. Sources must directly support claims and the source page that you provided does not support the conetnt that I mentioned. (✉) ‎"

0

91a199f858183f76

wtf? this aint me! who the fuck used ma ip?!

1

0

1

0

91a27ed27adc7481

" Frank, thanks for your message, and for not flying off the handle, as is often the response when people see their additions deleted. What we need for this information to be included is not just evidence that the town really exists, but that John Nichols had that town in mind when he wrote the novel. If you can find the long essay Nichols wrote about the novel and its adaptation into the film, that might help. I have looked for it, but to no avail. Cheers! -''''''The '45 "

0

91a5a41e1d507026

It is not copy paste or unsourced the article is on it's headline, it was vandalised before.

0

91a8f40c7e7ebff3

What are you talking about? There is a source!!!!!

0

91b0f74ebac8fda6

Thank you. I hope this edit warring will not escalate any further. Greetings.

0

91b393fde1fd9971

":::Hi Milo. Did you know I kind of like this band ? It's ok. Anyhow, I am grateful for all your help and support, you are a good guy. Respect. You probably do not want to associate with me (just look at my talk page) at this moment. Especially not smart would be to state ""you are in my cabal"". I am my own idiot, an island. I do not yet know what I will do, the band name above really boils my blood, but I will probably get bored and move on. We'll just have to see....127 "

0

91b63cd88ba59720

I think we should keep the Ulbricht article and drop this one. In case you didn't notice, Ulbricht is a real person, whereas Dread Pirate Roberts, the Silk Road version, is second-hand fictional pseudonym. Second-hand fictional pseudonym don't usually appear as entries in encyclopedias.

0

91b65a7e87e3fa3d

So how about the ones I suggested in the Talk Page? I really think that images like the one of Shego using her powers and at least one of her figthing Kim should be there.

0

91b6f71f964f3cf5

" Capitalization Am I missing something here? Why is only the first letter of the first word in the section headings capitalized? It is not the beginning of a sentence, and I have never heard of a grammatical convention that would allow for the primary words of any title, the title of a section in this case, to begin with a lowercase letter. A quick look at ""The Chicago Manual of Style"" provides not relief in this matter, so is this just a case of bad grammar?"

0

91bcd540dbb43974

============D - (your face)

0

91bef6d251fb3305

" Speedy deletion of Jennifer Tinsley-Williams A tag has been placed on Jennifer Tinsley-Williams requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, ""See also"" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. hangon Jennifer Tinsley-Williams is redirected to New York City Ballet's 2.3 Soloists of which she is one. — "

0

91bf57e206d65519

" Talkback NaSpVe | "

0

91cba85455239e83

Cool, thanks for picking this one up, I look forward to your review. All the best,

0

91ce26f5a25b358f

Hello, my article about Ryan Sheridan has been rated as C-class. How can I improve the article? I have recently added Ryan's year of birth.

0

91cf130ffb233151

Public reaction? == It sort of baffles me that I can't find much commentary on what was the public reaction to the riots? A billion in property damages, tens of people dead, and not a single famous/notable individual had anything to say about it, a human behaviour analyst or somesuch critisize the rioting or on the other end of the scale, someone praise it? ==

0

91d1d39df56ed9cb

The book has it as 15 days; I assumed since it had 7 there, the movie had seven. I will change seven to two.

0

91d461f98eb6da02

What Serbo-Croatian dialect says what as šta?

0

91d4c6886582f5e6

" Hi - I see you have recently created one or more new stub types. As it states at Wikipedia:Stub, at the top of most stub categories, and in many other places on Wikipedia, it is recommended that new stub types are proposed prior to creation at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, in order to check whether the new stub type is already covered by existing stub types, whether it is named according to stub naming guidelines, whether it is otherwise correctly formatted, whether it reaches the standard threshold for creation of a new stub type, and whether it crosses existing stub type hierarchies. Your new stub type is currently listed at WP:WSS/D - please feel free to make any comments there as to any rationale for this stub type. And please, in future, consider proposing new stub types first! ...wha? "

0

91db3a74c3d213df

" John i respect your comments, but it obviouse that they dont like oppisiton to themm thats the basic problem, but nonwe of them will say it. Why dont you just admit that you are just supporting you other admins, of coure i cant go and ""complain"" becuas i am sitting behind block that only goes to prove a piont, which if i am correct is aginst ""policy"". And no i will not create another this it the account that i use and this is the account that i will continue to use, and you can tell your firends likr User:UninvitedCompany that his comments are uncivil, and that his comment is agnist policy and that i would expect that you would block him if you were fair, but since he is part of the problem i doubt that he be blocked or let alone be warned for uncivility. | trácht ar "

0

91df212ee279d38f

REDIRECT Talk:Woke Up This Morning and Found Myself Dead

0

91e4a046a6660906

Sources? This article should provide sources, preferrably online ones. If some vanal comes here and changes a numbre there's only small chance to verify. 14:35, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

0

91eb334e996cff67

I want you to restore it if you are going to leave the rest of it. You have no right to edit my talk on this page.

0

91f4482c476147e3

"Hi, I notice you've relisted Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/V.V.L.N.Sastry‎. Per WP:DEL - ""A nomination that gets little response after the discussion period has ended can be relisted"" - the discussion period still has one day to go and it's not lacking responses! Just wondered if you're aware of exceptions or other policies covering this that I'm not? "

0

91f58cbef27e7ff5

I had not seen that you had made a new response on the GA review page. It is not on my watchlist, as I was not its nominator. However, as it appears that I have been the one who has been making the fixes I will remedy it. Additionally, I will be busy with work for the next couple days so I maybe slower in responding than I was before; sorry in advance for my tardiness.

0

91f791ca7ea19a8b

YOU SUCK YOU SUCK, CANADIAN BACON, YOU SCUMMY HOCKEY PLAYING, BIG NOSED, 'DONT YA KNOW' SAYIN FAG

1

0

1

0

1

91faf751f7975152

" Clarification needed - Run in with Tom Pettigrew after shooting her brother According to the Wiki article, under ""Brother's shooting"": ""...later pointing the weapon at a moving vehicle on the adjacent road, trying to get into the vehicle...."" Does the above have anything to do with this? It doesn't seem so to me. Here's a snippet of the article: Carrying a shotgun by her side, a 21-year-old Bishop walked intently across a car lot into the adjacent storefront, where she began searching for car keys. Coming down from the second floor, she was heading toward the garage when she ran into Tom Pettigrew and a friend, who had spotted her in the parking lot and came to investigate. ""Her gun hit me in the chest,"" Pettigrew, 45, recalled from his Quincy apartment. ""I yelled, 'What are you doing?' and she screamed at me to put my hands up. So I put my hands up."" But the Braintree police chief has cast doubt on that conclusion [that she accidentally killed her brother], and the armed confrontation at the garage provides new insight into her state of mind after her brother's death. The Boston Herald first reported Pettigrew's account of the events today. Only minutes after that shooting, according to Pettigrew, Bishop frantically told workers at the garage she had been in an argument with her husband and needed a car to escape, nervously scanning the premises as she kept the gun pointed at their backs. So, my question is did this Pettigrew incident happen before or after she pointed the weapon at a moving vehicle? In other words, what's the time line? Thanks. "

0

91fbf583b62f7414

Sign your fucking comments! 80.192.32.85

1

0

1

0

9204f105fdc3193f

Thanks for your kind words and I do hope that it passes for me too. Unfortunately, every time I attempt to criticize what I feel are portions of the project which are what I feel to be out of place I personally get attacked. Not to mention just ugh, there are aspects which I absolutely hate and cannot change, and certain editors who make my editing hell. This is the longest time I've been discouraged about Wikipedia, and I sincerely hope it'll pass too.

0

9206437fa400a909

(and permanantly from the chat room by Kelly's friend )

0

9208d500a75d3e29

Spanish people from Latinamerica Some Mexican editors seem to consider that 9 to 15 million people in Mexico are ethnically Spanish. To support this they offer: a Tour operator page about tourism in Mexico: roughly as unreliable as it gets. But even worse... a link to the Encyclopaedia Britannica which simply does not have anything even remotely similar to the 9 to 15 million claim. However, all that is not the real problem. The real problem is this: what have all those millions to be counted as ethnically Spanish? Note that we alrady had a discussion in About Regions with significant populations, where there was an agreement to erase the figures of Spanish people based exclusively on presumed ancestry and white race. If the reason to include someone as part of the Spanish people is simply ancestry, the amount for Mexico and other Latinamerican countries would probably get near 100% of the population... rather preposterous. If the reason are cultural traits, then we should know which are those traits, how they are different between individuals and what statistics we have about them. If the reason is whatever I can't think of, please enlighten me! I really would like to know if a conversation like this is common in Mexico: Hello, I'm Juan, I'm a Mexican of Spanish ethnicity. Hello, I'm Pedro, I'm a Spanish Mexican too! How nice, we have the same ethnicity, let's throw a celebration!

0

92097eddfce97b5b

I didn't think it was an improvement.

0

9219b7f8d46d34ae

Wikistalker and sock puppet Lay off. I will have recourse. You are not immune. Stan

1

0

922bcaf44059004e

Note to User:Becritical This article is not a legitimate target for removal without discussion. Moreover, for an article about a book, the book itself is always a legitimate source, and need not be cited as such; the Internet Speculative Fiction database (listed under external links) is also a legitimate source. Also, please note that if this article was to be removed, the proper redirect would be to L. Sprague de Camp, not Christopher Stasheff.

0

922caf0a7e6d3168

Why am I blocked? For some reason, i've been blocked and I don't know why.

0

922e5ed7bf422915

" You call MacDonald's a part of your ""culture""? Nonsense! Spend some 10 years in France, and then you will have a hint of what Culture is! "

1

0

9230b1529fe41777

BLP reminder This is a BLP, and we have to stick very closely to what the reliable sources say. Let me remind people that the recordings are not authenticated; I know of no reliable source that even mentions them let alone claims to have verified that the voice is Tropper's. The allegation about the revoked conversion is just that — an allegation; no reliable source states it as a fact. Even the claim that he was a major player in the Slifkin ban seems to rest mainly on Slifkin's self-published account, which is not a reliable source; I very much doubt that the Jewish Week verified it from an independent source.

0

9234a4eefcdfc266

Probably they do. (Talk)

0

9237b04dfa3d2e8b

" Please cite sources In a recent edit to you said: ""Introduction of info which gave rise to this debate in the first place the whitewashing of Egypt. I'll find some photos or hunt up some links later."" Please don't neglect this. "

0

92391e6383fd648c

I forgot to log on with my username, I corrected my mistake when addressing Marcus, I honestly don't see what the problem is, I don't use that Anon IP on wikipedia so its not a sockpuppet of me. Anyway Dick in that context refers to Don't be a Dick, if you had bothered to do your homework you would have known that, one could label Wiki:dick in this case as personal attack but personal attacks are not vandalism, so get your facts straight.

0

1

0

923c19c7155d5d39

, Thanks all. I'm not surprised. I was going to come back to this to try to find something better, but the lawnmower called. And fix Najran also, right?

0

9241721e10240a61

Discussion at Talk:Bull of Heaven#Genres You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Bull of Heaven#Genres. Thanks. Thank you.

0

924d752aa707f26d

Incidentally, I have a copy of the news clipping of that incident from The Sun newspaper. Instead of throwing your weight around, perhaps you'd like to follow one of the Wikipedia guidelines you are so quick to use when it suits you. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Please_do_not_bite_the_newcomers. You want stuff verified, ask the questions. Show us how to verify. Simply removing or deleting information is always going to get another's back up, something you may learn when you graduate from short pants.

0

924e00cee2965637

" Looking good for the image - the owner of http://flickr.com/photos/telstar/47854252/ says he is a registered Wikipedian himself and will be glad to add the picture to the article himself later today. Maybe even two pictures if we're lucky. That's the first time that happened to me, that I met someone who says ""sure, but why don't I do it myself"". -) (squeak) "

0

925a813e90a7e337

I think this image should stay, at least because its the only image that we have for Selena. If this gets deleted, then there's no image for her article. Thanks,

0

925d4e6436c5afaf

" The ONLY worthwhile candidate. It's true. Gravel is the only presidential candidate not spouting out the usual political BS (as well as Ron Paul). It only figures that he's receiving little to no attention. His accomplishments in the 60's and 70's with the War and the Pentagon Papers trumps the accomplishments of every other candidate, but that scumbag Giuliani is revered for his ""actions"" during 9/11. It's so depressing...ugh. This only justifies my cynicism even more. The majority of Americans are content with accepting the same garbage every election. If Clinton wins, that will mean for 24 years, the most powerful country in the world was controlled by two differen families. Disgusting. "

0

92632695ecdcfdaa

" This happens all the time on Wikipedia. We just leave the link and ref the way it is, I suppose. Sometimes there could be a web archived version to use. talk "

0

92647ad88063386c

New templates for Wikipedians W'Sallam, We need some more templates to be used for people who will be editing Pakistani articles, take a look at the following templates on the Indian Wiki board, if possible can you make some for the Pakistan Wikipedians. Here the link; Template Section We need templates of the following if you can create them; The first four, instead of NRI we need one for expat-Pakistani (i.e. Pakistani living abroad) and the last one (British-Pakistani) and (American-Pakistani) Fast track 07:20 23 March 2006 (UTC)

0

926a65c24209d14b

SimCopter Shenanigans Hiya. I originally followed this controversy in PC Gamer (my god, back when printed magazines were worth a shit), so off the top of m yhead I didn't have any sites. I remember there being a few Geocities webpages on SimCopter, but by the time I had graphical internet (circa 1998) it was already considered an old school game. One page I found while googling that mentions the controversy is http://www.langston.com/Fun_People/1996/1996CFM.html another is http://lists.samurai.com/pipermail/bryans-list/1996-December/001811.html apparently the programmer who inserted this easter egg was fired. Go figure - and here we have people trying to push the view that the Clinton years were all about tolerance. What a load. ANYWAY, before I go off on a political tangent, check out those sites, and I'll try to find some actual SimCopter sites at some point (though I get the feeling this will be a fruitless endeavor)

0

1

0

926c58f550dbd23d

, the process would be easier. Politically, LB and I are supposed to be on the same side, so the situation is ridiculous

0

9273a352e05cd02f

AP as sourcing Actually, the AP is perfectly acceptable sourcing for when a statement is accurate or not. They're specifically good at that. Your reversion on those grounds is specious, I am sorry to have to inform you. ?!?

0

9274525ee673f225

Ummmmm, no he hasn't. Go do some research and check back in. Oh, by the way...June 21st, be ready.

0

9275bb72e4e1728a

Justification to add new proof, using Bézout's Identity As requested by , my justifications for adding this new proof to teh article are: While it is equivalent to teh first, it is smaller and lighter to read. It emphasizes teh that

0

9277bfba5d028e11

List of Haitians Thanks for all your great entries! You are truly helpful. I am not Haitian but feel that they should getter coverage than the bad press they get. The list of Haitians is a step forward. Once again, thank you!

0

927c480151c147cb

" There is no difference in rhetoric. The quote that Jayjg took out of context was a citation from the Qur'an that Hamas uses (also out of context) to justify the killing of Jews. Zionists use similar tactics (that's where Hamas learned it) by quoting the Torah and Talmud to justify the killing of non-Jews. ""We must treat the Arabs like the Amalekites"" is a common sentiment among extremist Zionists. There are quotes from Zionist rabbis on this page that are indistinguishable from the logic of Hamas clerics. The denial of Zionism's genocidal intent and practice is similar to Nazis who denied the Holocaust and Final Solution even as they conducted it. Zionists claim to be ethical and humanitarian while routinely killing hundreds of children, imprisoning thousands of adults and oppressing millions of non-Jews in the name of their Jewish supremacist ideology and state. 02:55, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)"

0

927d095f2a424eff

to give you a citation of th title of it

0

927fa2757bcb79ad

We New pictures to replace the old pictures on the roster= There should be new pictures of the 1993-1994 TMC RTS of 84xx,85xx, and 86xx series, and 1997-1998 and 1999 NOVABus RTS,NYCT 1995 and 1996 Orion V, NYCT 1994-1995 Orion V CNG, Long Island Bus 1997 and 1998 orion V CNG, Ex-PBL 1997 Orion V and 1997-1999 Orion V CNG, C40LFs,NYCT 1998-1999 Orion V,All D60HF,Long Island 2000 and 2004 Orion V CNG and 2002-2004 Orion VII Hyrbid and CNG and Orion VII Next Generation Hyrbid and CNG. We need new pictures on the roster because the old one's are kinda old and there should be new pictures. If you have the time to take picturs of the buses, you should post the new picture and replace the old one on the roster. Thank you. thenovabus

0

9282af9a1a588635

" Aboriginal Australians for one. ☎ "

0

9286c917ae649bec

Well Im not either of them, its my first account & dont believe either Pete Rock, Scoop DeVille or Kanye West should NOT be listed as producers. It doesnt matter if they didnt make the final cut, if they didnt they dont list them. Otherwise, I dont see why your not listing DJ Premier, Pete Rock, Q-Tip or Madlib as producers for Kanye Wests new album.

0

9287569b6356badb

Leave me alone!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LEAVE ME ALONE DO YOU UNDERSTAND ILOVEDIRTBIKES

0

928817ea0cb33d55

I'm sorry, you may have misunderstood me. Please pay attention! thx. I want a sentence adding noting that compiling long lists is of interest to genealogists /// NOT that Wikipedia should host such a list (though FWIW I actually don't see too much of a problem with that either, that's a different discussion).

0

92950c048b77aafd

You might also want to have a look how wikipedia rules say not to include unsourced material! Oh wait you where claiming I did that before, but you put back referenced material I delted, so you know the rule! So why are you breaking it?203.192.91.4

0

92955936b4566544

" You say that Epeefleeche's one sided advocacy on your talk page is ""wikilawyering"" but you have caved in to it and reversed your decision. Now that you have allowed the opinions of this single editor to change the decision reached by consensus at AFD I sincerely hope that you stick to your word and rewrite the ""worthless"" article so that it has some approximation to an encyclopedia article and not simply a propaganda tract as it appears in its current state. "

0

929665eabaf59a62

Spanish immigration or migration? Most of it happenend when Puerto Rico was a Spanish colony, so how can it be immigration? That's like saying if you move from the mainland USA to Puerto Rico, its immigration. And even before the Spanish came, the Tainos had no immigration policies, regulations, or laws in place.

0

9298df499f9d41b4

I need to use that more. I do use it, but I frequently forget when making lots of small edits. I had been thinking that I need to get more done in fewer saves. Is it possible to copy a page to the sandbox, work on it there and then copy the whole thing back into the regular page?

0

929a3e9bc7a419cf

Even in the last edit by 97 on the link you provided, I am called a sockpuppet. My history has shown otherwise! 97 on the other hand even on his CATruthwatcher is deleting old edits on his talk page and on the 97 ip address to hide all the arguments. You don't and won't see me doing that at all. I leave all the old ones on the page. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CAtruthwatcher&diff;=prev&oldid;=397565427 .. CAtruth obviously has a connection to st johns... he wouldn't be so defensive about the school if that weren't the case. So would it be a stretch to say that he doesn't know someone who goes to the school or lives in queens? I'm not saying that 97 did the edit... but I think he had something to do with it.

0

929ea859b5551dee

Yogscast I see u r a yogscast dick rider. F.Y.I it's not vandalism if it's true moron. So quit following me.

1

0

1

0

1

0

92a2b216dfeac3bd

Buff Thanks, Burntsauce was driving me mental.

0

92aa7f690fc20708

"Are you REALLY that lazy that you can't be bothered to help? Just because this show doesn't ""exist"" any more. You're too lazy to complete the tables, but you are all for putting stupid templates about how there's not enough. I'm not the only person on Wikipedia, so don't just expect me to do it all, although that's exactly what you ARE expectiing "

1

0

92ad31c17995f30a

" Hi... I see my userpage's nonsensical MfD is doing just fine...although I wish to clear something up for you. You referred to me as ""he/she"". When someone includes the word ""son"" in their name, it usually means they're male. ) oaP "

0

92addcb3723642ac

" I'm noting here just for the record that creation protected the page. tion9 "

0

92b2c1ac08f2d5a6

" Dabangg After some serious work on prose and references, I believe the article is almost ready to be nominated for GA. Do you want to review it? ''' talk''' "

0

92b494f48e198b51

":::Your claim that the ""soldiers were on their own sovereign territory so they were not 'getting into' anything"" is contested. Israel claims that Hezbollah crossed into Israel killing 8 soldiers, and capturing 2 while the Lebanese claim that the two soldiers were in Lebanon, and that Israeli aircraft were flying over Lebanese airspace when the soldiers were arrested by local police officials. I agree with that the mere status of being a soldier makes you a legitimate target. It seems that you think its okay for Israel to capture and kill members of Hezbollah even though they are civilians but are still a legitimate target but that when Hezbollah captures two Israeli soldiers that they are not a legitimate target. In sum you claim, when Israel captures or kills civilian Lebanese who belong to Hezbollah they are killing or capturing a legitimate enemy target but when Hezbollah captures or kills Israeli soldiers they are not capturing or killing a legitimate enemy target. Again, this is a false dichotomy. And is a clear point of view violation. You also seem to have a predilection towards claiming that your point of view is fact as if ""appealling to the authority"" of fact will grant your point of view a superior position. "

0

92b5889eacb89f57

User:Adam1213/warn> Vandalism warnings

0

92ba8ebd43e175ea

T. K. V. Desikachar My mistake in not mentioning earlier. Please see whether uploading photos as under OK? license ?|cc-by-sa-2.5

0

92bc55ce64476e3d

My age is almost 57 years old.

0