id
stringlengths 16
16
| comment_text
stringlengths 6
5k
| toxic
int64 0
1
| severe_toxic
int64 0
1
| obscene
int64 0
1
| threat
int64 0
1
| insult
int64 0
1
| identity_hate
int64 0
1
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
9f8f5031dd220f03 | Zivan56 are you secret agent 001 of OZNA? You announce a lot of cazzate alias lies: stop it! In Italy live a lot of Albanians! You are communist, fanatic, liar, vandal of articles! | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
9f9e6673e4541a70 | "
WikiMarkup
Wikipedia has it's own special ""language"" called ""WikiMarkup"". It is very important, therefore, to know a good deal of it when you begin to write an article.
Links
External links
An external link is a link that goes to another website, besides Wikipedia. They are formatted like this: [Name of website goes here].
For example: [http://www.google.com] becomes .
To display alternate text for an external link, type [Name of website goes here Alternate text goes here]. Note the space between the website's name and the alternate text.
For example: [http://www.google.com Google search engine] becomes Google search engine.
Internal links
An internal link is a link that links to any page within Wikipedia. They are formatted like this:[[Name of page goes here]]
For example: [[Giraffe]] becomes Giraffe.
An internal link can display alternate text through the use of a pipe character ""|""
For example: [[Giraffe|A long-necked animal that lives on the plains of Africa]]. becomes A long-necked animal that lives on the plains of Africa.
Normal text can also be blended into a link.
For example: I like [[Giraffe]]s. becomes I like Giraffes.
Internal links can link across namespaces.
For example: [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view]] becomes Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.
They can also use Pipe tricks.
For example: [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|]] (note the pipe character before the two end brackets) becomes Neutral point of view
For example: [[Orange (fruit)|]] becomes Orange.
Redirects
A redirect is a page that, if accessed, sends you to a related page automagically. For an example of this, see Gill net. Note how at the top of the page it says (Redirected from Gill net). Voila!
For example: #REDIRECT [[United States]] redirects whatever page it was on to United States.
When you've finished this portion of the lesson, just tell me and I'll continue on to the next stage of your WikiMarkup lesson. Happy editing, ( ky ) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
9fa444d1d930b3c2 | ENERGEX MEDIA RELEASE - CBD
Good news! They're switching off power to the CBD in about four hours. That probably means we'll lose internet access across most of the city, and certainly all the major local servers.
Not only will that take care of me, but it means both pages will become totally irrelevant, since anyone who might be interested in your excellent article on the brisbane floods will be sitting in the dark.
Congratulations, you win. With a little help from a natural disaster. Well played. You two clearly work well together. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
9fa7ec91c6cd179c | (I took a look at the three articles reviewed, and commented on editor's talk page) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
9fa8eae06100f0e2 | Thanks for nominating WTRF, I'll try to pay attention to ensuing discussion. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
9faba26a9a91fec0 | Hey Man
You are a retarded Mexican cocksucking piece of fucking shit. Please go fucking kill yourself. Wikipedia admins are lower then niggers! Fuck you! | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
9fb341fccca8387f | "
I just saw what you wrote about me in the newsletter. LOL (I don't usually do that, the LOL bit, but I must be demented today)! I have received another request for a newsletter, so I've got to go make that. 110 " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
9fb352d0bbb0b0e8 | What about libraries in TV and satelite houses? Can one call them news libraries? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
9fbfe01a4449f3cb | I have just started to take a look, Peridon, but here's something that surprised me: the deleted userpage turns up on Google! In a very high position. I thought userpages didn't get indexed by search engines. Much less deleted uesrpages. Can you educate me? I'll be back after I do some more research. BTW I took a look at the deleted page (I can do that now!) and it's no wonder it was deleted. It was not only promotional and not encyclopedic - it was directly copied from here. from any other published source, not even your own. And the tone of the article has to be straightforward and neutral, giving the facts of your biography and career without any embellishment or drama. Read some other articles here about musicians and you will see what I mean. OK, that's some comments about HOW this was written. I am now researching WHETHER such an article should be here at all. Wikipedia is an international encyclopedia and it has to have standards for what kind of subjects can have articles here. The general standard is WP:GNG, which says that we only have articles about subjects that have been written about significantly by independent reliable sources. The specific standard for musicians is at WP:MUSICBIO. I'll be back shortly. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
9fc74022287f6325 | You NDP attack queers, sorry, Cabal of Sanctimonious Hypocrites, will go to any length to keep wikipedia as your own personal revisionist paradise, won't you? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
9fc76e063f7bad01 | "
Speedy deletion of Manilla River
A tag has been placed on Manilla River requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
9fc7a2ccecb40549 | That wasn't me. That IP as well as .58 are Proxy Ip's for the Navy used by tens of thousands of people. As surprising as this might be and as much as some may wish they were, most of the edits that come from those 2 IP addresses are not and never have bene me. Even though I was accused of it and the assumption was made that I am the only one in the Navy to edit here. Also, I haven't even looked at WP except to change my template from Semiretired to Retired. The only reason I even knew about this message is becausse I got an Email notification on my phone. 138.162.0.45 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
9fd793ed38f9726c | THAT WEBSITE HAS A TYPOOOOOOOO!!! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
9fd7e6b37010c079 | (The following is not a formal request to be unblocked)
Thank you AnthonyBradbury your comments made sense. The issues I raised relate to the ANI thread still remaining open. Both Erpert, NEEnt, and now you as an administrator have said that the matter is 'closed.'
Despite me being blocked 5 days ago and despite Erpert closing the thread and stating no further comments, another editor whatamidoing, removed that and continued making false, baseless claims, quoting inaccurate details, that easily be proved. Further, entirely separate matters, to what my block was for, are now being discussed 'after' I was blocked. Without me having an opportunity to present clear contrary evidence based purely on the objective editing history. And have a fair minded neutral and independent administrator to judge both sides.
These editors knew there was a ANI thread, but did not comment for 2 days until I was blocked. After I was blocked they then and only then, stuck the boot in, without any facts to back up their false claims. They may have waited until I was blocked because these baselss claims would have been proven false immediately, through me providing diffs and objective facts to the contrary. In fact, they only ceased when I asked for a temporary unblock above to respond! They would have kept 'hammering away' with baseless false claims, providing no facts to back them up and all the while, me being unable to provide the facts.
I have made some very solid edits to numerous articles. I respect Wikipedia. I respect Wikipedia's policies. I accept the reasons for my current block and would appreciate, after such a significant period, ie. 2 full weeks, to start afresh and be provided an assumption of good faith in my editing rather than editors judging me already. I think all editors, after being blocked should be given the benefit of the doubt. Not to have this thrown in their face for ever more. That's not right.
I know a lot about some topics. Very little about other topics. My reliable sources have good. My editing and additions have been good. Productive in many different articles. I completely reject being 'incompetent' as whatamidoing states, without me being able to respond. Simply because of differing points of view. I understand whatamidoing and Bilby are very experienced editors who have made great contributions to Wikipedia as editors. No-one is disputing that. They obviously gain a great deal of enjoyment from the project too! Does that provide these editors 'unequal' rights over less experienced editors who are also adding value to the project? Where they can make false baseless assumptions? I realise I have had some previous conflict with the same small group of editors in the past. But that says nothing about my edits being productive and of benefit to the project.
I believe strongly in the principles of assuming good faith amongst editors. I did not think blocks were punitive whereby other editors can 'mock' the person who has been blocked? Nor are blocks an opportunity to make false, entirely baseless assumptions about an editor's competence. Is the ANI thread closed or is it not closed please AnthonyBradbury? I am hesitant to ask this through a formal request unblocking request. So could an administrator tell me if this ANI thread that was abruptly re-opened by whatamidoing, after the block was already applied, and the thread closed? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
9fdbf50f3498aebd | I really do not see how i am acting immature, Klptyzm is an ignorant person, who has to tell everyone who he does not like that they will get blocked one Day. You will have you're Day of reckoning Klptyzm. Oh its ture. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
9fdcf08e89553b68 | You will be blocked if you continue to add unsourced info about living people, whether you think it is contentious or not. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
9fe2529bbf1aa64a | http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Crash_Bandicoot_%28series%29&diff;=prev&oldid;=484470162]], [], [], [], [] [[ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
9feb86417ebc3e31 | 1927 or 1928?
Quintana Condarco, Raúl de la, and Ramiro Duchén Condarco. Pasión por la palabra: el periodismo boliviano a través de sus protagonistas. La Paz, Bolivia: [s.n.], 1992. p 324 says that there is a record in El País that La Humanidad would have been founded in 1927, contradicting Lora's claim that it was founded in 1928. But I just get snippet view, and can't see the whole argument. Anyone would could sort this out? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
9fec860a2f43447f | Hi!
Hi I did not create an innapropriate page at all! it is legitemate!!!!
please tell me your argument
Headline text | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
9ff06890aa4caee4 | "
Blackie Lstreet: Why do you keep posting the same thing over and over again, and ignoring what has already been stated? You accuse us of ignoring the advice (yeah, that's right ADVICE) of outside editors, and yet you ignore that consensus at this article is to remove the POV tag because we don't see what you see! You ignore the very fact that ""What little, so-called BLP issues were there have been removed. In addition, these removals (tweaks included) were done by a couple of editors from this Noticeboard, helping to address any perceived BLP issues in the article."" This means that THINGS WERE DONE SINCE THAT DISCUSSION TO IMPROVE THIS ARTICLE! If there were some serious BLP issues in this article, as you claim, don't you think most editors would have removed all these perceived BLP issues by now? They do that for any other BLP emergency case.
A Quest For Knowledge, you shouldn't waste your time asking Blackie Lstreet such questions. He never specifies. And he can't because there are no such issues. The only issues he sees are things showing/discussing Casey Anthony in any negative way. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
9ff1c718e9ab636d | Yes, tell me what words to use in Ukrainian. I don't say that I'm an expert on English, but you tries to ignore all facts and continue support original research. And yes, I don't mind that pointed to my mistakes. Also, welcome to Kyiv! http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/32/Kyiv_Boryspil_Terminal_F.jpg 46.63.38.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
9ff1cfc970da373d | I also like the idea of taking it to Arbcom. Regardless of how any debate turns out the issue will just be raised again. There's got to be some neutral solution we can adopt and neither side seems to be persuading the other. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
9ffcdb1469a742a3 | Main Villain?
Am I the only person who does not believe Henderson is the season's main villain? Really this season did not have one person that was equatable to a Marwan or a Saunders. If one person had to be picked, it would have to be Logan. His role in the conspiracy was very comparable to Kingsley, and the two shared a similar relationship with Graham and Max respectively. So if one main villain had to be picked, I would say it's Logan. - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
9ffe9de4c77d69fa | "
Removed identity speculation
Per the standard set by the Belle Knox article, ""Do not post any personal information about who Knox might be in real life. Until she confirms her identity, any names or information is considered to be speculation and theory and violates our WP:BLP policy. Violations will be removed and repeated violations will run the risk of the editor getting blocked."" I removed the speculation about the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto." | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
9fff31c663b63e74 | In the mean time, maybe you'd like to use irc to go to irc.freenode.net #wikipedia , and maybe talk with me there? I'd best ask you my standard questions anyway. ) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a00118ce9e6accbc | "
Again, I feel you are not qualified to edit Wikipedia, just look at your spelling, ""Not as lomng as you are vandalizing the page with adding nonsense. Copnsider to add some real stuff"" If english is a forign language to you excuse me, although you could try using a Wikipedia site for different languages. I am sorry to say but I will have to repost ""yet again."" " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a00402581c14d96a | Then don't unblock me, but at least revert the F1 2016 article back to the consensus version, rather than awarding Tvx1 and Zwerg Nase for their successful ability to block everyone who disagrees with them. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a00d4df9e6ec6122 | Plagiarism
This is a copy and paste job from Encyclopedia.com | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a010117fbfadc8ab | "
Your submission at Articles for creation
Uchaguzi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. .
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a018e4f8104250dc | Too bad Danny boy, I'm back! D 94.4.73.221 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a01af4d0d5665885 | The rationale was to state the real position of the SPCS, not the read into position of some one who does not hold to SPCS objectives and edited out that which he did not agree with. Disambiguation? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a01c4e80f0ced442 | Added the use of philosopher's stones in world of warcraft. Anybody who has played as an alchemist knows the perks you gain from owning one of the more advanced stones when it is equipped as a trinket, not to mention transmutations of metals and elements. Which I think plays along well with the lore behind a philosopher's stone very well. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a0206bed9232b28f | "
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to File:MarkTwainatMarkTwainESHouston.JPG. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. TK " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a021165a0b89cd38 | The anonymous IP user is correct that these articles do all name Pinto specifically. The NY Daily News and Forward articles don't say anything about a curse. The Tablet Mag article mentions his name on it's opening page, but not any curse. The link to read the full Tablet Mag article doesn't work and points to therealdeal.com ( article not found). If you search for the article on their server you one , but the curse is mentioned in an anonymous user's comments, not in the article. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a02b1850325c9e2a | I object. And, I am particularly disturbed at the idea of an editor unilaterally merging articles with no discussion whatsoever, and with not even the courtesy of putting a proposed merger tag on articles they think should be merged. I take it from the comments above that this is a pattern that you follow. I also take it that it has created problems for you in the past. I would thing that should give you pause, but apparently not. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a02c581c3ff08d06 | "
I note that you made the same edits yesterday, as you did today. These included addition of an unsourced end date, despite a clear note that says ""Template instructions state this field should be ""present"" if the show is ongoing or renewed"". Since the program is ongoing, an end date should not be added until such time as the series actually ends. This is reflected in the template instructions which say that last_aired should contain ""'present' if the show is ongoing or renewed and if the show is ended."" It further says ""Only insert a finale date after it has happened."" Accordingly, if the end date is really June 25, 2014 as you assert, an end date should not be added until then. (✉) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a02d76731312ce66 | "~~~~
Hello Stesmo
I AM ANONTEXASGUY,
WHAT MORE INFORMATION DO YOU NEED TO BE PROVIDED WITH? HAVE YOU OR YOUR ADMINS OR WHAT NOT IN THIS VAST PAGE OF SCRIPTS AND CONFUSION NEED? YOU HAVE A COPYRIGHT VIDEO YOU HAVE CONTRACTS, YOU HAVE A COPYRIGHT WRITERS GUILD NUMBER... OR DID YOU HAPPEN TO LOOK AT THE RELIABLE SOURCES GIVEN YOU CLAIM WERE NOT GIVEN?
THIS ARE OFFICIAL DOCS ARE THE NOT?
SO WE ASK WHY DO YOU CENSOR.
ANONTEXASGUY
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a02f74b4143feab3 | "
Reply
Thank you for the advice. I will keep that in mind while editing, even though my friend mentioned the same thing you said over and over again. She can be very annoying sometimes. Talk Let's go Lightning! " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a02fa04a158a5ec1 | "
Yah, now to have a crat actually do it! Who says we don't need more of them? Now, if only someone would step up to the plate and change that... ;) ~ Riana ⁂ " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a03063f4f81db0fe | Why thankyou Iknow23 ;DDDD and you should really ask for a vote if the featured single should go in. It isn't just YOUR article...just because you got it to fl, doesn't mean you know whats best! and haha, yves, what a ledge ') I think there's need for it to go on its own, as its not HER single, she's just a FEATURED artist | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a046621c35b4dbf6 | Or are you acting under WMF orders, and therefore must persist with this? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a048277c1513126c | I see your talkpages under your prior name, to the extent that you deleted them while using your prior name. Also, should I wish to search for edits by others that relate to you (as you were previously named), I need to know the name(s). | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a048f978ae469446 | This is in fact the most poorly written article on Wikipedia. He needs to be described as a true martial artist, not just an actor and author and all that b.s. I am a student of his and would like to see what I know to be true posted on this page. He is a martial artist and needs to be recognized as such. Like I've said before, do you need him to show up and give you a demonstration on his abilities before he's recognized??? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a04ab2cb86017a6e | Thanks
For correcting the subpage problem in my user space. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a04fe164b91ed010 | |action5=GAR
|action5date=22:24, 1 June 2014
|action5link=Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/The Sword of Shannara/1
|action5result=kept
|action5oldid=606506788 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a053c0754196380e | Blake is correct that sourcing is not needed for the average plot section. But sourcing it has been a practice within the VG project for a couple of years now. The obsession to source plot sections in video games stems from the project's push to get articles to FA status. Among the laundry list of complaints and objections we encountered at FACs, sourcing was one of them. The idea was to source everything to be better safe than sorry.
In short, adding proper sources to the plot section is never a bad idea, but there's no need to dig extensively to do so. ( talk ) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a053d44f02e41e11 | Apprantly, now another user brought the page back | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a053ff45b45a3b09 | "
I disagree with this as it is currently incorrect. There is presently no political entity with the designation ""Palestine"". Why not also say Gaza City, Gaza Strip, Sameria, Palestine? The most neutral designation of the moment is Gaza City, Gaza Strip. 1:03PM, 18 May 2004 (PDT)" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a05637a851f0a2d5 | fuck of u dick cirt | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
a0583383bc3c563c | "
That's fine. However, you've all said your piece - move along or I will block you. Consider this your final warning for harassment. | 39 " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a0586f2ed977e529 | dude
whats your problem dude i was being serious on the last one sorry dick head eat my shit | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
a05e3e95f288abb4 | stop your shit!
Stop writing bullshit on my talk page! Spread your spam and gossip somewhere else. I don’t know in what kind of mental state you are and what kind of drugs you take before opening my talk page and I frankly don’t care what you think or what you do. But I guess you must have the most boring life in this earth, since you don’t have nothing else to do, bur write such garbage every time you open my talk page. Get mature! | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
a063410621ce9c64 | "I'm one of the biggest fans of this band , and I'm not just saying that.
About the genre in the 1st album they came up as an Indie Rock band with some emo songs such as ""Broken Man"".
After that their songs took a new way and started to sound little Pop Rock.
At the end the band can be listed into two genres ""Alternative Rock"" and ""Pop Rock"". 82.137.200.21
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a0641f9bd2d33560 | "
Streatham again
Thank you for the copyedits. I have been considering withdrawing the nomination owing to the non-constructive arguing with a certain reviewer, but your edits make me think ""I can't let everyone down"". Thank you. — " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a0653eba89f48627 | Orange 1969 picture
Whatdya think? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a0683ff7e751ba77 | Thanks for your response. The dome is a good idea, and I honestly wouldn't have thought it if you hadn't mentioned it. I'll probably be down at that end of town on Sunday and snap some pics then. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a069c9e2d37fce4b | "
Hello Mark: Excuse me, but I do not view any of the above quotes as questionable. They are the truth. Sure taken out of context to someone not familiar with the subject they may seem overly vigorous, but when faced by obvious ignorance and ineptitude I expressed myself in a forthright manner befitting an inexcusable action. You are coming in as outsiders. As far as I know only one person " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a06a8e06dab90f32 | "
Thank you, re: Reification
Thank you for pointing out that the way in which I was editing was incorrect. I thought that, in order to make original research claims, these needed to be published in journals and then linked-to. I didn't realize that what I had done at the Reification (fallacy) page was advocating for the application of that properly-reviewed research to a topic to which the research was related but not directly about, which then in itself counted as an original extension (and thus, also, original research). It took me a while to understand why this was ""bad form,"" but I got it eventually. I will be more careful in the future. (Should you see this happen again, the policy reference is to WP:ORIGINALSYN.)
Cheers, " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a06a92727f3619d5 | Make a separate section for the issues with Turing Pharmaceuticals - which has nothing to do with Retrophin. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a06b7e6897168f05 | The Haganah on the offensive
Last minute truce - incorrect, and based on a non wp:rs
Last minute truce - incorrect, and based on a non wp:rs
Dubious. incorrect. The Arabs in Haifa were asked to remain
Dubious. incorrect. The Arabs in Haifa were asked to remain
neutrality is disputed- were the Arab Armies prepared for the invasion
neutrality is disputed- were the Arab Armies prepared for the invasion | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a06d4366095930ea | "
Fair use rationale for Image:Thesecitiesourgravescover.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Thesecitiesourgravescover.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a06fb06e8ea8618b | "
Blocked
You have been temporarily blocked from editing because of your disruptive edits. You are invited to contribute in a constructive manner as soon as the block expires. (roger that) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a0722869ac8b7f9a | "
Newsletter
OK, I'll help when I find the time. (Which WILL be this weekend, I'm not going to be lazy anymore.) 620 Contribs " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a07539c160ce57e5 | How could the capital of Israel not be part of Israel, you fucking brainwashed Arab dumbass. | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
a0783abd2b652903 | Please stop raping little boys in the anus. Don't you know that's illegal? | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a07853c756700f80 | My favourite kiddie is Josh H as he and I are very fond of cucumber destruction. (anus) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a079960462ffcf91 | "
I will review the rest of the links shortly thanks. Pro " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a079e539e8cc4ad5 | "
Good to know
A bit from your friend's correspondence (under the ""Long time no see"" headline) found and copied to his talkpage (and subsequently deleted by him). As a Czech speaker you should be able to understand although it is not in Czech (""Borok"" means ""chudák"" in Czech, the rest should be understandable). Darwinek´s grandfather is surely proud of him. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a083d0dca9dc8dba | "
Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. SWATJester Ready Aim Fire! " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a084806fbeab00eb | Jackson Martinez 2
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Jackson_Mart%C3%ADnez#Atlético Madrid | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a08609ab5928ab1f | ":::::: I got blocked for 30 minutes, you got blocked for more than days. You is lost. And I don't even know who the fuck are you. It's a zero!
" | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a09932bfcf01aede | "
Not the same people? I""m a regular joe, and I am interested in Feynman diagrams. I suggest that articles should start with the simple and progress to the complex. Opening with a mind-bender sentence like this one shows a lack of consideration for anyone with less education than a PhD. A few sentences is all we're asking for. Im sure Mr Feynman would agree that any science concept can be explained in everyday terms, and Wikipedia is certainly an appropriate place for such explanations. Perhaps someone familliar with his works could look up what he himself said about his diagrams? Surely that would be an appropriate opening? " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a09c311d6fef9f3e | I see you have signed up! Consider notifying 3 good editors of this to encourage more participation. Perhaps saying
I am participating in this. Please consider doing the same! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:The_Great_Wikipedia_Dramaout/3rd#Participating_Wikipedians | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a09c31dd6fa24871 | Alright, DRMAGIC, I am sorry.
I will state here then that she is very pretty.
I am sorry to offend you, Mr./ Ms. Opinion Censor. Allow me to bow and kiss your feet. | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a0a0c749c8f26afd | Assumptions of bad faith are not assumptions when there's a pointless and groundless CfD launched at me, and RMs closed with me as the closer's rationale; never mind all the stupid things being said and alleged the ANI (which I'm de-watchlisting; anything I say there gets little respect anyway and defending yourself is a stroke against you, in the previous ANI I was directly told to shut up and that I had no right to speak there). | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a0a7397fc50f928f | Cock?
Is it true you have a giant cock for a face, Coelacan? | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a0a80e5cf3c1a3fd | "
Welcome!
Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Tutorial
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! (Yes, I welcomed myself. Handy links, those.) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a0b1005a30938185 | and write an original comment | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a0bb4fc8adaf0cf2 | It's been a while
It's awesome to see you back! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a0c0104d30b1d81f | I can't defend the 'vandal,' so to speak, but this article has problems. The first line refers to neo-futurism as a 21st century movement, and yet the gallery has many structures that were done during the 20th. The St. Louis Gateway Arch, for instance, is OLD. I was brought here by the article of Buckminster Fuller, and he died in 1983. If you can't tell us what century something is from, this does create a credibility problem. Also, and this is just personal musing, the nomenclature is problematic and recursive. How many times are we going to reinvent futurism? If I built a building today and designed it to look as futuristic as possible, would that be neo-neo-futurism? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a0c6028150db922e | Deletion at Memills' talk page was inadvertent
Because it was similar to the material on my own Talk page, sire, and I had been going back and forth between the two, I mistakenly thought that I was deleting a comment on my own page. Thanks for noticing. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a0c7c776b155a803 | OK, I understand about me, what are you going to say to Eldumpo ? He provoked me, he deleted many many things on Wikipedia, check his history, he just deletes, no improving, it is this normal behaviour ? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a0cede3d652030d1 | "
""Somebody, go write one."" Do it yourself lazy.129.139.1.68 " | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a0d4033cd25637c7 | Personal poem
I have left you a personal poem on your user page. There is no need to pay me for this service. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a0dac906c5f05083 | "
Vandalism at Pinto da Costa
Well done kid, you got what you want from the start: hide Pinto da Costa's corruption scandal. You cannot say someone is the best at something and hide the detail of corruption. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.244.75.87 " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a0dc7f47a56e0097 | It's called shunneling not unconditionally IDIOTS GROW A BRAIN! | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
a0def2cb38f152ae | Current events tag or something?
I don't know if this is already being done or not, but shouldn't there be some kind of tag at the top of the article citing this person's relationship with a significant current event? 74.107.120.44 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a0e0f57274712cf1 | "==The unfinished state of this article==
This article was created as a subpage of Animal testing because of the need to use summary style there. That means there is currently only one incident discussed here, which looks a bit odd given the title. Hopefully in time others will be added. (talk)(contribs) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a0e748af05cdcafe | "
What you were up to, you mean. From the beginning you're personally attacking me and harassing me, and this is the only way you found to try to claim ownership of articles.
And yes, it's highly suspicious that you seem to monitor everything that happens between the IP and me. At worst, it shows that you're actually tracking down my edits, ie harassing me, at best, it proves you are the IP because without any communication with me or the IP, there is no way you can be aware of anything in so much details(unless you're harassing me). And no, that you happen to hear about this matter right after it occured, while nothing suggested you were active here for 2 days, cannot be coincidence.
And finally, please, Buspar, stop playing on words. This is what the admin that took in charge your SSP case stated, and nothing else: ""Looking at contribs, User:Buspar and User:Xuanwu are very probably the same user. Technically, they cannot be socks, as one username was created after the other stopped editing"".
This statement is based on the technical definition of sockpuppetry, meaning that a person is using different identities at the same time. The admin only noted that the 2 accounts were not used simultaneously, but nonetheless acknowledged that Buspar and Xuanwu were the same person (""Looking at contribs, User:Buspar and User:Xuanwu are very probably the same user."")
The admin, however, never confirmed that you were not the IPs Onethirtyeightdot suspected you to be. If you've seen the line ""No, Buspar is not 130.49.157.75"", then please source it correctly.
So, what do we have ? An admin confirming you're likely to use several identities, an anonymous IP acting in exactly the same way as you do, having the same personal issues with me, editing the very same articles as you do, reverting back into articles the very same contribs that you made, and it also seems both you and the IP seem to have a telepathic link allowing to know every issue occuring with the IP without you being contacted by it beforehand.
As I've said, I'm offering to peacefully resolve this problem.
I am sincerely convinced that Buspar is the IP, because I've noticed the very same edit pattern, because both users contribute to the same articles, and both users seem to have a personal issue against me and both seem to systematically revert my contributions as soon as they concern article about illegal downloading.
Thus, this is not randmon bad faithed accusation. This is only what I sincerely believe.
However, if it is absolutely proved that Buspar and the Ip are not the same and that Buspar and the IP don't behave in similar ways, then I'm ready to make excuses to both users and to stop identifying the Ip as Buspar.
But if someone has any doubts about the IP identity, or if someone clearly acknowledge that Buspar and the Ip have the very same behavior and edit pattern, then that's all I need. I won't continue to call the IP Buspar, on the condition that an admin clearly acknowledges the IP¨as being Buspar, and that Buspar in his future edits, only revert edits of mine and talk to me under his Buspar username. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a0eb2214a894d03f | it should be noted that Fountain Valley ,ca has a terrible ant computer bias! Twice I hgavde been rousted by a Officer HSU from Fountain Valley park, Fulton,Park fror useing my wifi pc! Even brurtally serached by this COP! I suggest an investigation of the crimanal civil rights violations of this place.Especially towards PC uses in a Public Area such as a Public Park Edson Andre' Johnson ~~~~ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a0ef2c40fd0ec718 | Thanks for the support. (Not to undermine you, but Arthur Rubinstein was always Arthur, not Artur; from the talk page: In his memoir, Rubinstein addressed this issue. He wrote that his name was Arthur and not Artur, and that he was greatly irritated by people who insisted on calling him Artur.) Cheers. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a0f4c93ef48e5950 | Just because you are not familiar with Web technologies doesn't mean we should deny the world of their descriptions. The Web of Contacts was the model used by SixDegrees.com, and was an agent that built social networks. The Circle of Trust was a model that allowed people to indicate the users they trusted. The Circle of Friends, which is used on Friendster and MySpace allows people to manage their social network. The Old School Tie, used by Classmates.com is a social networking system that allows you to link up with old school friends | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a0fddd69c23d7fbc | I may not be a member of a particular wiki project but I have worked as a professional opera singer, been in professional musicals, and hold a BME. I'm not exactly a novice in the field. If it is a musical like you say than there should be some scholarly sources to back up that claim. Perhaps a biography of Hammerstein or a history of musical theatre would discuss the work in that context. At the moment your conclusion is clearly WP:OR based on the sources provided. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a0fe56bad52f1399 | You have made a mistake
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ealing_North_(UK_Parliament_constituency)#Elections_in_the_2010s. See this link and you will see that Stephen Pound was elected as MP in 2015. Please check before removing edits that are not spam.
Thank you.
Ukvoltaire123 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a1067d9b1ff064ca | Does not explicitly call him a fascist. Your extrapolation is again, a vio or OR. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a10698e79500a1c9 | word use
Hello. Regarding your recent minor edit to The Amazing Race, while it is not worthy of being reverted, I have to strongly disagree with your reasoning. Impact can, in fact, be used as a verb as it was in the article. Your edit was completely unnecessary. 192.91.171.36 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a10b4a62a36e8ee0 | Thank you! It's good to hear from you. I'm fine. Thanks for asking. My last computer stopped working and I had to wait for a while to get a new one. I just got one and am looking forward to getting back to work on WP. I didn't see YOU for a while; you don't seem to be editing as much as you used to, or maybe I'm just not seeing your edits. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a10e0d34d400a6de | The German people are not good. You must drive on Friday, your grandpa do not think you're begging in the street by Max burger (Sweden's tastiest burger). What is your whitest diaper? You can wear your diaper in the Indian Ocean for the feast day. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a10e5aa25d3324b1 | as a sign of respect for your edits | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
a115f3ff876ec56f | . Please see 2014 Crimean crisis for reference on the monopoly of russian nicknames adding pro russian bias to the article. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.