id
stringlengths 16
16
| comment_text
stringlengths 6
5k
| toxic
int64 0
1
| severe_toxic
int64 0
1
| obscene
int64 0
1
| threat
int64 0
1
| insult
int64 0
1
| identity_hate
int64 0
1
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
da442f3a5c5254d2 | "
Link clean-up
We got caught. Too many links. Apparently Wikipedia is not supposed to be a repository of links. We should link only to 'further reading type material', i.e. ""neutral and accurate material that cannot be integrated into the Wikipedia article due to ... amount of detail."" So I removed most of our little link farm. I hope everyone is agreeable to this. — " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
da4c55251a5c20b1 | After a request asking them not to, user Darkmaster2004 has edited this Talk Page. They are also repeated reverting my good edits. 86.13.182.103 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
da556ca4319b4eae | Understood
Just make sure no one else makes subsequent comments on the same nomination page to which you're not asking me to provide my replies. Otherwise, if people will continue to write underneath my previous statements of opposition, to make my comments just as readily available, I should be able to have such comments of mine posted rigth below theirs without having to resort to post on another page that would make my comments obscure. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
da597822cfa97a2e | user:Precious Roy, stop posting on my talk page and GO AWAY!! you are not welcome here! contact Flo with any questions stop harassing. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
da5b68207cbd59ce | " 2007 (UTC)
I've always understood Charles Chaplin as the ""most famous"" as his image has been suggested as the most internationally recognisable. I would suppose the only true contender to that title to be Elvis Presley, with Marilyn perhaps as third? This is supposition of course
22:15, 12 October" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
da70bc31d9bc46fb | "
I see your comment here, Blueboar. I observe your frustration. I also am frustrated by the long-running, predictable battling. How about your doing some actual development of articles from sources, rather than quibbling with decent development done by me. That would go some way towards something. Your work on developing tables for the other-than-U.S. masonic buildings was something good in progress, basically. ncram " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
da7434a0edbe1add | " It is a ""Biblical scientific foreknowledge"" thread. The goalpost are not being moved.
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
da753d3c669c3992 | I'm far away from being a professional artist. Sculpting, painting and digital art is just a hobby since I'm 16 - about 15 years. The picture you mentioned is not very well - I know. It was one of my first digital work. I'll remove it with the next brush up of my site. 07:05 16 Jul 2003 (UTC) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
da7f4392bed1e727 | I think it's OK to cite this particular item from Newsbusters. The very first time that I watched the ABC video, I too was suspicious of their on-screen logo covering up much of the relevant part of the video. We all know that the logo covers up part of the video, and the Newsbusters article just verifies what we already knew anyway. I don't think the standards of verifiability for something so obvious need to be as high as for other kinds of claims. I support inclusion of the Newsbusters source. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
da85c4a1449510f6 | Are you having a wind up? There is no need for an article on TD 8 as it is a fishspinner. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
da88223d93ab9cea | Yeah, I wasn't sure. Should I just include a link to the Google Earth picture or something? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
da90adbd4c34386c | vandalism
Your Abuse Response Filing
Greetings! Thank you for filing an Abuse Report for abusive behavior originating from prashantsingh1142. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
da910a10e2290205 | "
@EdJohnston: Done (t • c) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
da9307568116289b | Since you asked? I'd suck it up, understand that Wikipedia is attempting to be encyclopedic and that statements here should be backed up by reliable sources, and find one. You claim you're essentially an expert on Britich comics...what's to stop me from making the same claim about physics? We can't simply take an editor's word for it that they're qualified to speak about a particular subject. This is discussed at length at WP:V. Making the effort to find a reliable source seems, to me, a more productive use of your time than dwelling on the fact that your information was removed for lacking one, especially when it's not an attack on you or a matter of questioning your credibility. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
da9754f1647e9a19 | France expansion
related talk () | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
daa2ca4b17230a54 | "
Copyright violation
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your , but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.
Feel free to re-submit a new version of the article. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement ""I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later.""
You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. You can also leave a message on my talk page.
The article Eugene Guth is a compliation of several printed sources. The copyright belongs to their authors. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
daa605106c2f3fbe | ":I agree that there might be a problem however, I generally agree with the changes made since Nov./05 and still do. Moreover, your above analysis et al. is not necessarily agreeable and glazes over usage of the term, which is no less valid or verifiable, that might differ from cited definitions which seem (IMO) incomplete and minimalist. For instance, an online search will reveal a number of instances of ""single(-)star system"" and I think it somewhat difficult to demonstrate they they too are incorrect. Even if those are discarded, applying this notion merely to systems with two or more stars (double, trinary) to the exclusion of single-star entities (e.g., the Solar System) seems rather illogical. Alternatively, the current article and definition/content is neither beyond the scope of the topic nor inaccurate.
Thus, I defer to my prior comments: until there is overwhelming evidence to support this position (and I yet do not see it) or additional editorial comment, I see little reason to change the status quo.
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
daa747d649e28e71 | "
Pardon me, but it appears you're being far more vocal than I am on this matter. And you haven't proven anything to me. The only way you can be said to have proven something to me is if I am conviced of it. And, by ""the rest of the group,"" you really mean ""you,"" right?
I think we're all capable of discussing this without needing moderation.
I don't agree that the issues are resolved. And how am I ""campaigning?"" I'm trying to facilitate reasonable discussion of the issue, as opposed to your unilateral declaration of ""this is the way it is."" And if you're going to accuse me of sockpuppetry, you'd better have some hard evidence to back that up (hint: there isn't any), as that's a serious accusation. (talk|Contribs)
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
dab343c22abbc221 | "** What exactly is ignorant and absurd about that? There are good reasons not to like his contributions, and what else than a user's contributions should be grounds for a ban? You can look through his edit history and hardly find a single useful contribution. Instead you find bizarre claims like ""10% of popes have molested a child"" or the one that gay people make more money ""due to the exclusion of their kind in society, forcing them to evolve differently and work harder than they would have."" Not to mention threats like ""If you think there is POV in homosexual abuse in Catholocism then take it out, don't delete it, remember, fix, not censor, otherwise I will list you as a censor and you don't want to be on my bad side"" or ""all information is supported, don't change this or I'll ban u"". 03:21, Aug 15, 2003 (UTC)
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
dab5fb8a715f1690 | UPDATE: Hello. I sent in an e-mail and this request is unfortunately not doable under the oversight policy. You may leave a note in the block log using a 0-second block. Thank you. 69.155.128.40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
dab66a971799599a | Agreed. I'll make an effort to do some work on this article over the next several weeks and months, but I really want to hit the library first and get some real sources for the article and porn/erotica section in particular. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
dab79e620360d2ec | User page layout
I saw your user page layout and I liked it so much that I used it for mine. I credited you at the bottom of my user page. Hope ya dont mind ;) 00:44, Jan 28, 2005 (UTC)
Help yourself! A few other people have as well. Glad you found it useful. - τ 21:00, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
dab933829e0bf938 | question about p53
Could you see Talk:P53#Phosphotransferase? about this this edit and the question: is p53 a phosphotransferase? Thanks. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
dab96097c282d632 | Track listing
Is the track listing for this album correct?
In my copy (bought in the UK), the listing is
Whisky In The Jar
The Rocker
Jailbreak
The Boys Are Back In Town
Don't Believe A Word
Bad Reputation
Dancin' In The Moonlight
Rosaline/Cowgirl Song
Still In Love With You
Emerald (Live)
Waiting For An Alibi
Do Anything For You
Sarah
Parisienne Walkways
China Town
Killer On The Loose
Out In The Fields
Dedication | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
dabc734316be73e5 | Arbitration Committee ruling
The case against you has closed. It is the decision of the Arbitration Committee that you are to be banned for sixty days ending 17 March 2005. You are also prohibited for a period of one year from editing any article which relates to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict except in the following manner: each edit shall involve insertion or removal of one discrete piece of information which shall be referenced either by comment or footnote to a specific page in a book published in English and readily available in libraries or by purchase. References to URLs are acceptable only if the site is in English and the information referenced is readily located by consulting the webpage. You shall be placed on personal attack parole for three months; if you make an edit which an administrator judges to be a personal attack you may be banned for up to three days. All information added by you to Israeli-Palestinian conflict articles must be adequately referenced, and you may not remove adequately referenced information from Israeli-Palestinian conflict articles, and you also may not revert edits which are purely organisational. For further details, please consult the Committee's final decision. t 01:47, 2005 Jan 16 (UTC) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
dabca9752cfa897f | Unfortunately, due to my history, I don't think many admins watch my talk page. And I could see someone may have caused some more slightly contentious edits. But I think my history speaks for itself. If I really wanted to get unblocked solely to harass Factocop, or was of Trollish mindset, I would have just edited unregistered. I respect my account, and believe some other editors respect the edits I make. I.e Irish & Northern Irish infrastructure, Air Transport, and Derry articles. Anyway, how would I go about attracting attention to other admins for an independent review? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
dac07760cc03f671 | Check Out Mentone Grammar School's talk page
I need some support here. I am not Simon Cormie, nor Scott Powell, nor a member of the intergalactic badminton team. How do you know these guys?
The is out once more..... | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
dac10fd8c70fa5a5 | MDPI link change
Hi. We are trying to make the wikipedia page of our publishing house less confusing. Therefore I changed the link from mdpi.org to mdpi.com. You are right that mdpi.com is an outgrowth of mpdi.org. Nontheless mdpi.org/MDPI Verein is almost irrelevant while mdpi.com/MDPI AG is a rather large and important international open access publisher. Before I make any further changes I would like to consult you: We would like to create seperate wikipedia pages for mdpi.org/MDPI Verein and mdpi.com/MDPI AG. Any objections? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
dac71db1d178cf5c | "
Much better ] And yeah, it was the best free image I could find P – (talk) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
dac95add0a3cb0d2 | I.P. address/range blocked? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
dacb776ddc42adcc | Sticking my oar in where it may not be wanted, but I've always thought that Wikipedia's definition of COI is completely nonsensical. Basically what it boils down to is that you ought not to write on any subject you have professional knowledge of, give or take. So you're right Montanabw, but ultimately it's going to come down to sourcing, obviously. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
dacb7e87b415b878 | but also read shoa too since your curious about the amhara thing. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
dacee59ca47c9fa0 | "
Im blocked for calling ppl on the ""other side"" for the opposite word of ""conspiracy theorist"": ""propagandists"". Conspiracy theorists is a word frequency used and accepted but i guess the admins do not threat everyone in the same way or they just want to have a excuse to remove posts and block editors. Everytime i discovered that some of the sources in the moon hoax article is using misleading propaganda im not even allowed to say it without actions is taken to me - thats IS censorship and it should not be accepted." | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
dacfdfb01b9c830e | ==The Above two editors are tag team edit warring and may be the same IP and an IP check is called for. They need to look up boomerang effect. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
dad21d944170f2f1 | "
I dont know , when someone trys to ""talk"" on a talk page and someone keeps reverting it , it is counter productive ." | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
dad2cee3f882987a | *sigh*
I want to bang heads together. Note especially the Edit Summaries. So I've stepped it up a little. — Timothy (not Tim dagnabbit!) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
dad412de0ff60ca5 | Thank you for experimenting with the page Nate valler on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
Some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Nate valler may not be sufficiently well-known to merit articles of their own. The Wikipedia community welcomes newcomers, and encourages them to become Wikipedians. On Wikipedia, all users are entitled to a user page in which they can describe themselves, and this article's content may be incorporated into that page. However, to merit inclusion in the encyclopedia proper, a subject must be notable. We encourage you to write or improve articles on notable subjects. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
dade9e8fdcf01347 | PARYS,
YOU JUST BANNED ALL THE USERS OF THE CENTRAL BRANCH OF THE LOS ANGELES PUBLIC LIBRARY FROM BEING ABLE TO EDIT WIKIPEDIA PAGES.
I AM GETTING IN TOUCH WITH VARIOUS WIKIPEDIA ADMINISTRATORS AND LETTING THEM KNOW THAT NOW LITERALLY 1000s OF PEOPLE WHO USE THE LOS ANGELES PUBLIC LIBRARY COMPUTERS WILL NOW BE NO LONGER ABLE TO EDIT WIKIPEDIA PAGES AS A RESULT OF YOUR GETTING THE LIBRARY'S IP ADDRESS BANNED. I AM GUESSING THAT YOU MAY HAVE DONE THE SAME THING WITH THE 1000s OF PEOPLE WHO USE THE U.C.L.A. COMPUTERS. THERE ARE ALOT OF PEOPLE WHO ARE GOING TO BE ANGRY AT YOU FOR DOING THIS, AND I WILL MAKE SURE THAT THEY FIND OUT WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DOING THIS.
AS LONG AS YOU CONTINUE TO PUT UP FALSE INFORMATION I WILL CORRECT IT AND TAKE FURTHER STEPS TO SEE THAT OTHER PEOPLE BECOME AWARE OF YOUR DELIBERATE MALICIOUS HOAXING.
2 previous wikipedia hoaxes you worked on have already been
deleted: Crystal Cherry (crystalcherry?) and Once Moore.
How many more hoaxes are you going to try to get away with?
You are giving Mandy increasing grounds for filing a libel
lawsuit against you as you are putting out false info that
could have a financially damaging effect on her career.
It's bad enough that you put a link to the teenage pornography
book on your home page and that you put a link to your home page
on Mandy's official board that has lots of very young users. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
dae2cd2bbeedf717 | Connor, it actually looks like you don't know how to source properly. You're putting sources in the edit summary (including using citation templates, which are very difficult to read in an edit summary but useful in an article itself). They should be in the articles themselves so that readers can see them. Only editors can see comments in the edit summary (and they'll be very hard to track down in the future). I suggest you take a look at WP:CITE, particularly WP:INCITE, or ask specific questions if it's still not clear to you. —Alex ( | talk | contribs) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
dae9e1bad382cb37 | F' you turk
it is funny you have to live in seattle and france, why don't you go back to your shithole turkey, or even better yet, to mongolia? my people were around europe when your uncle and aunt were out fucking the pigs in mongolia. that is sick you have european citizenship. as an EU and US citizen, i should report you the police and get you thrown out.. if nothing because you are a stinking lawyer. get out of europe.. we don't need the stink.. you like to quote le pen. he is a finer individual than the racist pigs of turkey.. who murder and never admit. what hypocritical blood you have.. but i bet turks are too blind to ever see it. no surprise. good riddens. | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
dae9ef11e7804a6d | "
First project for Wikipedia
As of April 2, 2008, edited this page as first project. Any comments appreciated. Did the following:
From previous posts, learned that page direction was for terminology, not necessarily biology. But added more succinct genetic information citation to definition, making the body of the text heavier. Added short biology section because of this.
Found more usage of the term ""black sheep."" Depending on the group culture using the phrase, it was either positive or negative, so further clarified usage by splitting the term into two groupings with citations and examples for each. I know Baa Baa Black Sheep was removed once. However, it is an example of the use of the term. The other examples should be obvious. If not how do I clarify.
Did not find a standard template for citation on this page. Would anyone let me know what the standard for this page is and how it was chosen, and I will go back and change. Thanks. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
daeac0c1894c58db | Who does this remind you of? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
daeb58b99a8c3dd5 | Re: Warning
>>Stop hand nuvola.svg This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people as you did at User talk:CarTick, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. –SpacemanSpiff
Ans: Fuck you, glorified clerk admin - go ahead, block me.
How long do you think before I can edit with a proxy server? But I won't because I couldn't be bothered with either your content, or with a weak Dravidian contributor like you. Enjoy editing on Tamil and Tamils! | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
daf5329d788f31c3 | You stupid nigger
You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger
You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger
You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger
You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger
You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger
You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger
You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger
You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger
You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger
You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger
You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger
You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger
You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger
You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger
You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger
You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger
You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger
You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger
You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger
You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger
You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger
You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger
You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger
You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger
You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger
You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger
You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger
You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger
You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger
You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger You stupid nigger
You are a stinky face.
222.127.85.44 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
daf59d29384fcd65 | Prof. Binienda participated in the investigation of the Space Shuttle Columbia disaster and was awarded by NASA . Dr Szuladzinski deals with mechanics of breakdown of structures and belongs to Australian National Security Researchers Directory. And what is the experience of air crash investigations of experts of Polish government's committee? None. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
daf622b61feca0f7 | Thank you for your interest in VandalProof. However, I must reject your application for the time being. We feel that a minimum of 250 main space edits is necessary to allow a user to establish themselves and become familiar with Wikipedia. I look forward to seeing your application again in the future. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
dafa46791aadd71b | "
Kewl. I've read the application section through and can't find what the tone problem is. I've added an intext source note but even as the matter stood the section began ""according to Gurdjieff"" and so far as I can see doesn't deviate from that attitude or tone. Where does it? Can you quote something objectionable? The section simply explicates the concept. If every sentence is meant to begin ""none of this is scientifically proven but the idea is"" then we can apply the same principle to other sites. I understand the concern about promotion, and have seen plenty of articles on wikipedia which justify it, but I can't see that this is one of them. Also the referencing tag is mispalced. The tag the article needs is the one calling for page numbers, that would be a fair cop.
This is not to say that the article as it stands has no problems apart from page numbers. The subject of the enneagram is a huge one, the difficulty from the wikipedia point of view may be that a satisfactory article would be too long. The problem will probably have to be covered by more complete references....the ""enneagram of essence types"" as developed by Collins-lineage Fourth way should be mentioned for example; and the work done on the enneagram by Bennet-lineage people. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
dafa7770552e9fb9 | "
Aside from failing to provide a source for Coulter's NASCAR comments and her later correction, what are you referring to (and I could cite the newest edition of her book, right?)?
I mean, aside from the on-going battle on John Gibson's page, which I haven't tried to correct for months, I have no idea what you're talking about.
Okay, I noticed one of my edits for ""The State"" (MTV sketch-comedy show) were removed for not having a citation...but NOTHING in the entire section is cited!
Seems other than that, my recent edits have stood up..." | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
dafc902727a6b4ba | is remove by bot now! ridiculous. please to fix mistake most quickly. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
dafcdfdd216bc03d | Lol at casting aspersions on an authoritative text, coming from the press of one of the most reputed Universities in India (check the book), and written by the only professor ever accorded the title of the National Professor of Sikhism.
Lol also at inferring historical proximity and partaking (=joining-in) as being an inspiration ?? Especially when the author clearly says that doing so shows a complete lack of understanding of Sikhism.
At least you tried to raise some seemingly logical concerns. The comments from the rest of the mob above are not even worth responding to. Yes, it is a mob, and nothing else. Anyone with an impartial point of view reading this discussion would understand it. The mob can keep writing whatever it wants. Zero credibility though !! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
daff3e0e47678920 | Updated Stats
We relly need updated stats lol.72.138.216.89 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
daffed42e5cb133b | ", 20 February 2012 (UTC)
Category:St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador articles by importance is a perfectly acceptable page about which I have no complaint. But am talking about Editing Category:St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador articles by importance where you had eight minutes warning between speedy tag and deletion. Please confirm that:a) you realise that Editing Category:St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador articles by importance is a mistake title and b) the most sensible thing to do when you realised your mistake would have been to move the article instantly and c) write a ""do not delete message"" of now moved - it is OK on this title is isn't it?. — (talk · contribs) 10:51" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
db008be24bc58904 | "
WP:MOSDASH says that when there's a ""from"" or other preposition before the range, it's a bump for the reader to then have to move into a typographical symbol. So ""from ... to ..."", not ""from ...–..."". It's not a big deal, but I correct this if I'm copy-editing to make it more logical/consistent/smooth for the reader. (talk) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
db05538f5120d262 | Gross misinformation
Look:
I don't care where you took this chart from, remember well: Bulgarian has six vowels, SIX, SIX, SIX and NOT eight. There are four other allophones (two between a and @ and two between o and u), which appear in unstressed syllables depending on the position of the unstressed syllable to the stressed syllable within a certain word. If you are posting also allophones and not only phonemes (the reasonable question is why you are doing this but we'll deal with this some other time), then the vowel chart should include all ten of them and not only eight with information which is an allophone and which is a phoneme. But you don't know that, do you?
Then we get to another reasonable question: why do you think that you can erase the whole vowel section with the vowel descriptions? Ha?
So: you post a chart which is WRONG and then you erase a section which is RIGHT. What the hell are you doing? I am getting tired of non-experts who read something somewhere and then come and try to wreak havoc on articles which they understand nothing about. A couple of months ago, one user was trying to change the article Bulgaria because he had read that the Bulgarians were descendants of the Shumers. In two words, your edit is pretty much of the same value and worth. For the phonetics section here, I've used the Routledge compendium on Slavic languages (1991) and the newest Bulgarian edition of New Bulgarian - phonetics, grammar and syntax. Please, consult any book on Bulgarian phonetics before you come again with this vowel chart. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
db087744ea578518 | Merging articles makes sense to me. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
db09449d3ca2efd2 | student uprising 1973
I don't have any research data exactly, but I am an American who was a US Navy dependent wife living in Athens when the Polytechnic uprising occurred. And since I was there, although not directly involved in the uprising (just got caught in some of the crossfire) my perspective is quite different from what has been presented on the pages. I would like to share with you what my experience was, and perhaps it could lead to some further illumination of what really happened during that month or 2. (It wasn't all over in 2-3 days, as the story indicates) And there were many more killed than the numbers listed, although I have no evidence of this. I personally saw beatings and shooting by police and army at the Polytechnic when I took a friend to deliver food to her brother who was a participant in the uprising. Her name was Litha and his was Vagellis. I no longer recall last names, but could probably find out from some old friends. She came to New York to attend college in the mid to late 1970s.
The question that has always haunted me is why the US government totally ignored the entire situation in spite of the fact that the 6th fleet was anchored at Elyfsis and the AirForce base was fully manned and operational. The American press did not even report the uprising. As I was only 21 at the time, my parents watched carefully for some news of what I had written to them once mail service was restored, and only a short virtually nondescript article from UPS showed up buried in the back pages of the newspapers. It was never even mentioned on television here.
I am still haunted by what I saw, and that was 32 years ago. I chose your user name from the discussion page because of the passion you wrote with in the wording of several of the sections (although they were changed from your original wording). From this I came to think that you must believe somewhat strongly in presenting the material accurately and as completely as possible.
Please let me know if you have any interest in hearing my version of some of the events. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
db0df01ac4b7e58d | of User:Scepia/Xbox Live | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
db0fa5bae94f2432 | T-rex in Aladdin
Okay there is a t-rex in ep 9 and im trying to put the information about the t-rex in the ep 9 discription but some jerk keeps deleting it | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
db13e6c3326d13a4 | (may have been an F5)
[[Minneapolis | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
db15d71e91a3a72a | "
You are mistaken. I do not have any warnings, so you can't just give a ""last warning"". I was already blocked, which was removed due to unfair warnings. Thus, I have no warnings. Also, I have not spammed any links since, so explain what you are talking about. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
db1eaec99dbaf456 | You are 100% free to take another stab at the article's plot section, especially now that you see what was the earlier problem. Best wishes! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
db2c9dae1ec7fc47 | January 2008 (UTC)
We've made some progress. What's next? Is there a particular section that you'd like to have sourced or expanded? Should we re-invite WPMED folks to come take a look before the topic changes on Monday? 22:45, 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
db2e38cdc29bcf69 | Sounds good to me, Support.'— | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
db2f08da607d21d6 | the eastern part of the island | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
db34e75933988aac | "
{| style=""background-color:#F5FFFA; padding:0;"" cellpadding=""0""
|style=""border:1px solid #084080; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top; color:#000000;""|
Hello, ! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on , or place on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Talk
{| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#F5FFFA;""
|style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""|
Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored
How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips
Where to ask questions or make comments
Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research
Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources
What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons
Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry
Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy
External links • Spam • Vandalism
Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability
|class=""MainPageBG"" style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""|
{| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""0"" cellspacing=""5"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA""
! The community
|-
|style=""color:#000""|
Build consensus • Resolve disputes
Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette
No personal attacks • [[Wikiped | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
db3a2e10a5725975 | "259694712&oldid;=259689030]. And what I added doesn't fit a ""symbolism"" section. Above, I was complaining about removal of mostly symbolic parts; well, actually, what I missed was first the mention of those fact, and only afterwards possible interpretations. Looking at the guideline and its provided example, I do think that the significance of the facts should be described in-between the plot. I'm not sure if that's what the manual of style actually says.
You at the very least need to cite the ""possible reference"" part. gial
For instance, I do not appreciate most of the edits of this combined diff, from the same author of the one I discuss above: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Garden_State_(film)&diff;=" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
db3a6665b74bb326 | I've also warned this person, in detail, at several IP addresses. He pops up every two weeks or so. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
db3ba314476cd596 | It was Meet the Quagmires, the episode where Peter goes back in time to save his marriage, and ends up accidentally punching Ernie, explaining the grudge he holds against Peter. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
db3be51da444ce50 | Hi Direktor! Is this the forum to discuss Editors political beliefs? I don't like Communist or Fascist/Nazi movements. How about you? True in the past Tito was consedered to be a hero, but since the fall of the Berlin wall, from an Western point of view a different picture is emerging. Wikipedia should reflect that and it can be reference with Encyclopaedia Britannica & BBC-History. I'm not for a dramatic change of the article, for now. There will be more research done concerning the aftermath of WW2 in Yugoslavia and it's not looking good. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
db434b5db460dfd0 | "
Sure. Click on my name at the end of this message, then from the menu to the left of my userpage click ""email this user."" Wikipedia will only let you email text, but that will put us in email contact without either of us posting our addresses here for all to see. Just be sure to put your email address in the body of the message & I'll write you back so that you can send me the images. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
db47d67e7e973357 | I haven't followed the above discussion but alarm bells are ringing for me about the above post. Presenting a list of sources for discussion must surely be an excellent way forward for the article. People should be discussing the quality of the sources per objective criteria independent of the sources' conclusions, e.g. academic publisher, peer review, author's qualifications. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
db49097ef7ca12d3 | "
It may not have been unusual to be self-taught in medicine, but I think the reader deserves an explanation of how one ""becomes a doctor"" without going through any process of certification. If this was common practice in those days as well to set up practice as a physician without any formal credentials, the article needs to say so, since a ""doctorate"" is an academic degree bestowed by an institution of higher learning. If as you say the source uses exactly this wording, then it would be best enclosed in quotation marks, to show the wording is not a careless interpretation by a Wikipedia editor.— " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
db4a2959a5339c9c | I will give you a clear answer. I have just to watch what the wikipedia admins are doing. I am looking specially to the justice of wikipedia and after this, if you are here, you will get your answer. You have showed by this to everyone, how knogledgeless, hopeless, jealous, shameless and stupid you are! (Tofaan-توفان) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
db4cea3f86e9246b | I believe that all of the professional productions that ran continuously for 100 performances are already mentioned in the article (unless there was one outside of the English-speaking world). Note that D'Oyly Carte played Pirates every year from 1893 to 1982 and did it usually once a week in repertory with other G&S; shows, but sometimes twice a week or in more than one touring company (that's between 5,000 and 10,000 performances over those years). However, there have been various productions by major opera companies, regional theatre companies, foreign theatre companies and repertory companies that should be mentioned at least briefly before the articles is nominated for FA. But as I said a couple of times already, I don't have the time to research those right now, and since Adam has nominated this article now, I think it is up to him to do the research if we want to get this in before promotion to GA. As I also said, he is working on a show that is starting tomorrow, so he may be out of pocket for a week or two. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
db4d155ba0d568ad | All the conquerors of Jerusalem built on top of what was there before (the Crusaders, the Romans and the Muslims were very good at it, if I'm not mistaken). | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
db524f0a680517fc | Delete page
Hi I recently created a nonsensical page for fun. Sorry to violate the rules. Please delete the page David_valdman. I'll do my playing in the sandbox.
Dave | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
db5487767f46c0d5 | "
I'm a little unsure if the Stereo Remixes section should read as it does. Although it was quite nice of him to do the mixes, Dominick Giammarino is not a notable figure in Beatles history. I think a little vote is in order. We all have toyed with Beatles songs over the years. * Sixstring1965The Beatles Wikiproject August 24, 2007 21:59" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
db54dce2b1f1dd46 | gonna get you...
...you giant twat faced prick!!! 86.179.113.103 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
db5ae36cc7c7a8ca | "
Yes, that's how I assumed it worked as well, but where's this ""somewhere else"" that led to the creation of this article? I would assume hip hop culture, but the only place I find is hip hop music which also contains much more than a summary in its old school section. You're right that this article is meant to be an extension of another article, but it's currently only an extension of hip hop music and should therefore be called old school hip hop music.
It might be wise to let old school hip hop redirect to old school hip hop music for a while, however, as many other articles link here. When a section about old school hip hop appears in hip hop culture, we could redirect old school hip hop there instead, until that section grows big enough to justify its own article about general old school hip hop, like you said.
- " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
db5b4c7e09a2e9d4 | "
Hmmm, the work of Polish proffesors is not a ""reliable source"" ?!
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
db5eb72a91170ad9 | OK, who is going to find and add the sources? And who is going to remove the unsourced, and when? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
db634921ebab7cce | "
Großhauptsturmführer
Hi Arm, I've reblocked the above, because it's clearly an inappropriate name. I hope you don't mind me adding that it's normally better to discuss a block with the blocking admin rather than unblocking, except in cases where a clear error has been made. Cheers, (talk) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
db66998ecf67def6 | "
excuse me, but I have NEVER commited vandalism. it appears that someone signed up using the name zigz0gger with a ""0"" and vandalized pages to frame me. Please review the IP addresses of whoever comitted the vandalism, and you will see that it was not me. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
db699f105622680a | 6 to 8 Frozen Zone
This Google search for this show that excludes mentions of Gillies, Trainor and Lawrence finds nothing about a TV show of that name other than a delete discussion at the NL wiki. I doubt this show ever existed but somehow got attached to Gillies and Trainor as either misinformation or a web hoax. IMDb does not list this show and they are pretty good at info on old shows. I removed mention of this show from this article and Jerry Trainor's article. No mention was in the Mr. Lawrence article. I would like to see some proof of existence outside of web articles on Gillies and Trainor before considering this a valid credit for any person. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
db6b0751c881dc2e | Deleted Image link
Page of Sijce Andonova. The image is here:
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:SijcheAndonova.jpg
but I cant connect it to the page, can you help me? Thanks | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
db6c4049951f649f | That could be done then (memorials). With regard to pressing ahead; I meant detail, not a split. There is a class article, as there should be. But I wanted to make the design and construction sections a bit more specific to Titanic, rather than its sister ship. I'm busy doing some other things at the moment. But in the next few weeks, I'll return and start. As the article expands it might need breaking up. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
db6e6510d77c1710 | "
Oh, and by the way, there is a clear line between ""vandalism"" and adding common knowledge. They may be unsourced - but they are not promotion, soapboxing, or vandalism. Get a dictionary." | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
db70adfd322335f0 | I give up - complex legalese arguments are useless on the ignorant | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
db710f659d008367 | degrassi season 8
degrassi the new season fucking sucks so much.... theyve turned it into a fucking reinacment of laguna beach or some other mtv bullshit fucking show and seriously i wont be any fucking surprised if they just cancel the goddamn show after this stupid ass season... | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
db74252b6e90dd12 | Ungracious? What of it, I'm not the Queen. We are here to write an encyclopedia not an etiquette book, a self promoting peerage, or even a manual for soothing hurt feelings. Perhaps some people here need to be reminded of that. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
db80796b8641a6e2 | "
Controversial Remarks Alleged Calling Facebook Users ""Dumb F**ks""
REFRAIN FROM DELETING THE TALK PAGE CONTRIBUTION WITHOUT PROVIDING A VALID REASON OR BETTER TIPS FOR IMPROVEMENT. AFTER ALL THIS IS ONLY THE TALK PAGE
sources for the below mentioned contribution:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/andygreenberg/2012/02/01/is-zuckerbergs-the-hacker-way-letter-facebooks-dont-be-evil-and-will-it-live-up-to-it/
http://gawker.com/5636765/facebook-ceo-admits-to-calling-users-dumb-fucks
http://au.businessinsider.com/well-these-new-zuckerberg-ims-wont-help-facebooks-privacy-problems-2010-5
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/05/14/facebook_trust_dumb/
http://www.theweek.co.uk/technology/14625/are-users-%E2%80%98dumb-fucks%E2%80%99-trusting-data-facebook
http://tdh.me/zuckerberg-called-early-facebook-users-dumb-fucks-so-what/
http://anphicle.com/en/they-trust-me-dumb-fucks-facebook-ceo-mark-zuckerberg/
http://www.tomsguide.com/us/Facebook-Mark-Zuckerberg-Social-Networking-privacy-security,news-6794.html
http://au.businessinsider.com/embarrassing-and-damaging-zuckerberg-ims-confirmed-by-zuckerberg-the-new-yorker-2010-9
Other sections on Wikipedia where Controversial Remarks is valid:
Bryant Gumbel (section Controversial remarks)
Mel Gibson (section Controversial remarks)
Sherrod Brown (section Controversial remarks)
Kent Hovind (section Controversial remarks)
Venkaiah Naidu (section Controversial Remarks)
Greg Gutfeld (section Controversial remarks)
Lawrence Cannon (section Controversial remarks)
Daniel Bernard (diplomat) (section Controversial remark)
James R. Flynn (section Controversial remarks)
and many many more
start.
While at Harvard College 19-year-old Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg allegedly used login data from his social network to hack into fellow students email accounts; that evidence also included instant message transcripts where he calls facebook users ""dumb fucks"". The alleged following exchange is between a 19-year-old Mark Zuckerberg and a friend shortly after Mark launched The Facebook in his dorm room:
Zuck: Yeah so if you ever need info about anyone at Harvard
Zuck: Just ask.
Zuck: I have over 4,000 emails, pictures, addresses, SNS
[Redacted Friend's Name]: What? How'd you manage that one?
Zuck: People just submitted it.
Zuck: I don't know why.
Zuck: They ""trust me""
Zuck: Dumb fucks.
In another instant message (IM)
FRIEND: so have you decided what you are going to do about the websites?
ZUCK: yea i’m going to fuck them
ZUCK: probably in the year
ZUCK: *ear
end." | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
db810c7b11d3854a | Vandalism
3 July 2005 02:56 (UTC) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
db8221e2592fe882 | Stop!
Regarding your rant about the Founders section in this edit... Stop! No on ever asked for the lengthy list, and all editors involved alredy knew about the list at the other Talk page. I did not remove any information, I appropriately replaced it with a link to the original section, which is fully intact. Though restoring the lengthy list was entirely unnecessary, I don't have any major complaint to having it in a hidden section. The restoration of the section in the hidden template makes your subsequent attack entirely irrelevant. You will be reported if you continue this behaviour of commenting unnecessarily on other editors, as you have also continued doing with BlackCab. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
db858184cb39d89b | "
Is there anyway to merge Talk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
db87566bb2d0f48b | NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL
I am writing this message to you as a notice of my withdrawal from Wikipedia following the recent events/edits on the CNN and Susan Roesgen pages – events that you were involved in. Never in all of my years in academia (the better part of a decade) have I been privy to such patently-insincere and downright academically-fraudulent work as that which I have encountered on Wikipedia.
While I was initially willing to set aside all of the negative things I had heard about Wikipedia in an effort to contribute to a seemingly beneficial project, the actions of editors and administrators on the Susan Roesgen and CNN pages has made it eminently clear that “scholarship” and Wikipedia truly are mutually exclusive – propaganda has carried the day.
My failure to grace the project with some actual academically-sound work was not made in vain; with every neutral editor that you drive out of the project with your blatantly POV-pushing agenda, you further bolster your reputation as nothing but an unreliable propaganda board. Your reputation for unreliability was perhaps best captured in a recent statement made by my corporations professor: “I decided to make myself more ignorant on the topic by looking at the article (Dodge v. Ford Motor Company) on Wikipedia.”
I strongly encourage you to alter your course, set aside your agenda, and reverse your – and Wikipedia’s – reputation as a laughing stock. This will not only benefit the public in general, but will, I submit, actually make you feel better about yourself. Best, J.M. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
db958912a6ec42a9 | Recent ABC news video
A video about BF2 on ABC about BF2 and the 'killing of Coalition forces' in the game and that its going to train Insurgents to kill U.S. soldiers (Oh no, terrorists gonna prone spam!) is located at http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=2105341
I'm way too biased about the silliness of it to write about it, so watch the video and get writing if you aren't biased and won't use weasel words. (Even this talk section is biased! I could barely write this!) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
db9b85d084ba0fd5 | Fixed reference in the article. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
db9f946b8aca9acd | = Voice Actors Wiki
Re: Giusy Di Martino and similar: It's a slum, compared with WP, but if all else fails, Voice Actors Wiki] on Wikia is at least a caring home for VA articles. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
dba391b60dae23d8 | "==Notability of Jesus eduardo talamante zayas==
A tag has been placed on Jesus eduardo talamante zayas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
dba50b699f8900da | This page does not just refer to a website, it refers to France's largest organization for the study of international economics. They do research, manage databases and produce academic papers. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.