id
stringlengths 16
16
| comment_text
stringlengths 6
5k
| toxic
int64 0
1
| severe_toxic
int64 0
1
| obscene
int64 0
1
| threat
int64 0
1
| insult
int64 0
1
| identity_hate
int64 0
1
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
e23f6b29749267f8 | "
Meteorite?
There was fragments which made it to the surface. So should it be called a Meteorite? (talk✉) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e2438cb0845d96c0 | Khalatnikov
JETP isn't scanned yet, so Khalatnikov's contribution, which seem to be closer to Candlin than Salam and Matthews (Feynman also does something similar to Salam and Matthews in one of the electrodynamics papers, but without the Fermionic coherent states, and without the justification in terms of sum over intermediate states, which are both found in Candlin for the first time, I think.) This paper talks about the result: the integral over Fermionic fields is defined following Schwinger so that the action principle will work, and the result is that the determinant is in the numerator and not the denominator. This is most of Grassman integration, but without the formal anticommuting variables, which seem to have been introduced by Berezin and Candlin independently (at least according to this source). I did not read the original Berezin articles, only the 1965 textbook, so perhaps they are more complete than I originally thought. If anyone has read these, please include a summary of the contents. The real question, in my mind, is as follows:
Feynman's propagator approach only requires that the statistics be correct when permuting the ends of the paths. The rest can be done by summing over particle paths, with appropriate projections to deal with Dirac eqn. So the early authors, between 1948-1954 are all dealing with formal anticommuting variables (no complete theory). This is true of the Schwinger action principle, and to a lesser extent, of Matthews and Salam.
Matthews and Salam, like Feynman in his QEDIII paper, treat the sum over histories as green's function manipulations, without trying to formally define a calculus of anticommuting fields. They do define anticommuting sources, and anticommuting field Green's functions, but this is similar to Feynman and Schwinger. It does not have the crucial addition that the algebra of the fields in space-time makes sense, and the Fermi field integral is a sum over intermediate states.
Khalatnikov seems to have understood the modern thing: that the Fermionic integral is a concept that is well defined. Unfortunately, I cannot access his paper. If anyone has access, please find out what is in there.
Candlin defines the whole thing, in a very modern way. This paper is the best on the subject I have read, but it is similar to Berezin 1964.
Berezin has some papers in the 1950s and 1960s, which seem to develop the whole thing indepedently, starting with Khalatnikov's observation. These papers are also crucial- who develops the Fermionic coherent states? And who shows that the Fermionic integral reproduces the sum over intermediate Fermionic states?
The whole thing is somewhat implicit in Matthews and Salam, but also in Schwinger and Feynman. The real important development is the identification of sum-over-intermediate states with grassmann integral. If someone can point out who did what, it would help a lot. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e243dc4ad75a521c | "
Vandalism
Possible vandalism from user:Mwarren us user:Gesslein
he/she removed and manipulated article words, trying to hide negative matters . it is not good to hide truth. Contact Blogsd !
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e24678b92f4165fd | You
I'll be back. You haven't seen the last of me. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e24c2e5636abb413 | Thank you, . I hope that you and yours have enjoyed the holiday season (so far) and have the happiest of new years! — Talk/Stalk | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e24f0057f2995957 | User page
You're user page is showing up as an article on a few of the list pages, which is something a userpage shouldn't do. It's probably because of the categories listed on your user page. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e25334b3d76a0932 | Aesthetic Realism
Hello, Outerlimits. I note that you have worked on the Aesthetic Realism article in the past. If you can find the time, I would appreciate it if you could look at the article again. I recently made a series of edits to it, most of which should have been quite uncontroversial. All of them, including basic corrections to grammar and punctuation, were reverted without explanation by LoreMariano, simply because they weren't discussed beforehand. Could you please comment on the talk page? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e253dfb6cf4319c5 | "== UNSC Forces ==
It says that the UNSC forces are on the Rebels' side helping, but I see no mentions of it elsewhere. Although the UNSC forces are helping the Rebels' in the entire war, I'm not so sure that their helping them in this specific battle. Are they helping them in this battle? ARKJEDI10 " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e25534cc3f6197b0 | "
POV/ESSAY/SYNTH/TRIVIA tags added
This article has all the very same problems that the Chinese Canadians in British Columbia article has, and the reasons are laid out on the talkpage there; they have been ignored by the shepherding editor here who is unconcerned with and doesn't care about WP:NPOV which is policy. Numerous guidelines are violated, I won't waste my breath; but somewhere along teh way someone who does not share the biased views and scholastic premises that the OWN author of this article has laid out, and will recognize the incredibly bad English composition, and the use of pasting together cherrypicked items to build SYNTH/POV...so very obvious. ""Honestly I think these tags are more than deserved"", to paraphrase the edit comment of their illicit removal from the CCinBC article by the sole author here who successfully lobbied to have me blocked so he was not 'interfered with'. What has been interfered with is BC history with a very clear ethnopolitical bias and soapbox agenda.
I am leaving Wikipedia; I will not waste my efforts any longer for a place where travesty like this was mollycoddled and nurtured in violations of several guidelines and also of the NPOV ''policy'. this article is a political tract rife with synthesis and cherrypicked sources, and distortions of others. tiresome and juvenile and a good demonstration of why Wikipedia is not real encyclopedia but more and more a compilation of jejune essays - and outright propaganda. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e257926598714ccf | "
I'm looking for a nice way to say not dead yet.
Perhaps you can help. I'm working on creating Template:Infobox Mayor, Template:Infobox Mayor/alive and Template:Infobox Mayor/dead similar to the same infoboxes for Senators, however, Mayors aren't in the public view nearly so much as Senators are. They might die without their articles being updated in quite some time. So, I'm looking for a way to phrase ""not dead yet"" in the infobox that doesn't sound crass or ghoulish, but lets the user know how dated the information is. It would also serve as a marker point to check the obituaries if you were to see that a Mayor's article hasn't seen him confirmed alive in ten years. Also, I'm still trying to think of a tactful way to insert that into the infobox itself.
I hope you can think of a phrase to help. Please edit the infoboxes, too! The only Mayor attached to these templates so far is Jack Ford of Toledo, Ohio (from the VfD pages).
Thanks! focused 05:45, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e257b97f1c0d11e0 | Awww how come you took off all of your discussion posts? Don't want anyone to know how much of an uptight, anal retentive, faggot you are? 66.158.193.30 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
e258e1086d83cb35 | "
IRC
See what I meant with that IRC chat? People who are content with the way things are very rarely change, whether they're right or wrong. They'll continue to be content until their little world comes crashing down around them. Hopefully that'll help you understand why I didn't bother with them in the first place. I'll see you in awhile, my friend. Thank you for trying to help. afist '''''' " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e25af6202ec3336a | Thanks, SNUGGUMS! I hope you have a pleasant Halloween, too. ) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e25b576561750ca9 | Nowhere in the links you provided do I see that MPAA and BBFC classifications are non-notable. They are notable enough to have Wikipedia articles devoted to them. The information is displayed prominently at the beginning of almost all previews and in advertising for movies because of its notability. The information includes the UK and the US, the two largest English-speaking countries. How can you assert there is a Worldview bias? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e25cd6bc2823c6a0 | RfA
Hey, a fellow British Columbian! Anyhow, thanks for taking the time to express your comments at my adminship application, and please believe that I'm very conscious of my relative inexperience. If, in the future, I take any action, (regardless of whether or not I become an admin) that you have problems with, please let me know. Thanks for your time, and all the best. parley | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e2611be13b2e3af1 | "
Try paying closer attention: the Examiner article pre-dates the show ""The Dating Guy"", as well as Sohmer's stated timetable of being made aware of its existence and the circumstances of its similarity to (what he considers the uncredited/unpaid use of) the IP he had already developed. Saying the Examiner ""avoided"" mentioning an unfair or inaccurate characterization. 76.31.236.91 " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e26863909cfe2ffd | "
This is a short list of users whose pages I found provocative. No one has questioned their neutrality, even thought the content of their pages heavily implies they view Wikipedia as a battleground and are most probably inserting their point of view in their edits. Unfortunately, I refrain from inserting mine, since facts and history back my ideology.
User:Canadia. This remark got him blocked for 24 hours. 1 Something I wrote, much much lighter than that remark got me blocked for 2 weeks.
User:Etherialemperor
User:Snickerdo
User:IZAK
User:Guy Montag
User:GreatGatsby
User:MathKnight Note this user's page. He writes under a photograph of an Israeli armored bulldozer "" This dozer saved many lives."" If I had a photograph of a Hezbollah rocket with ""This katyusha saved many lives."" written under it, I would be blocked.
My case is quite different. They support a state that commits terrorism each day, I show support for a movement that resists this state. No logic in this world anymore. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e26918a3f9d3cb6c | I've mentioned this article at the BLPN notice board. It burden falls on the one who restores contested material to get consensus. So don't reinsert the material untill there is consensus to do so.·snunɐw· | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e26b106943e02cbf | bitch
you are a fucking hore. you suck dick you big ass hole. you are gay you faggot ass bitch. you can go to hell you bitch ass motherfucker, suck a big dick asshole. i'm fuckin your mom ho. she can't get off my dick. your daddy probably raped you in the ass everyday when you were young you stupid ass motherfuck. | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
e272994c324d09fa | "
More on Gay Games VII
Hi, Kile! Forgive me for butting in, but I wanted to add an outside perspective... You and Marc have been discussing some issues that are very tough to deal with in the context of an encyclopedia - and more so in the context of an open encyclopedia that anyone can edit. You, as the director of the opening ceremonies (among other roles) are probably the best source there is for information on the subject. But on the other hand, you're only one person, and you're not verifiable - by which I mean, that information is in your head and it isn't possible for anyone else to look it up and corroborate it. Someone could ask you, but there again, you're only one person. You can see the difficulties here )
There are a couple references I wanted to point you to that might help clarify the situation. The first is Wikipedia's policy on Autobiographies - a similar area where the best source of information is the individual themselves. And to point out how Wikipedia recognizes the issue at the topmost level, the second is the speech at Wikimania 2006 made by Jimmy Wales, the founder of the Wikimedia Foundation.
So those are my outsider's comments - I hope you continue to be a part of Wikipedia, and I hope you'll take a look at Wikisource - putting the speeches you mentioned on that site would be a great asset!
Thanks, (talk | contribs) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e273faa3437dc6ff | Too Bad, Blocker!
Too Bad, Blocker! I am un blocking! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e2788ff20bcbd676 | You also forgot the most important one of all: Blaisphobia, which is the fear or dislike of Ms Céline Blais, a lousy math teacher who cannot answer her own questions. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e278ae0df7a8b31e | The term level is commonly used to describe the values of a factor, but this article makes no mention of it, other than in the sentence (the assumption about the levels of the factors is fixed for a given F) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e279b2d541293ded | photo, but left the article without a leading img at all | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e27de00e49028fde | Thanks. ) I'll do what I can as soon as I get the time. - Return fire | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e282c1c2074f5545 | Hi again, KS. I just saw your response on the noticeboard and wanted to thank you for your understanding. It's possible that the survey you received was part of a series of Editor Engagement Experiments that being performed to try and get editors editing again. And also to fix some of the problems we've found. You can find more information at WP:E3 if you are interested. We are also discusssing issues and leaving suggestions on the talk page there. If you have any improvements or thoughts you'd like to share, they would be most welcome. Thanks. 64.40.57.45 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e285e01bbb764679 | Dear Top Jim,
Could you confirm that my External Sponsors can write NOW the page ?
Best regards.
Philippe. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e28bc06ab9451c64 | Hahahaha!!! X_D I can even sorta imagine the rythm of the chorus too! (Kinda tough first line, hmm?) If that's the chorus, I can't wait for the full lyrics!
And I have seriously considered setting up the Spanish project (I just got an account there), I'm gonna ask the user that adopted me how to go about it (that wikipedia is subtly different from this one). Will need tips from you undoubtedly. ;) Cheers | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e290157dff1f4e69 | "
As you wish. What I was trying to say, perhaps not particularly clearly, is that I haven't changed my mind about the basic concept of singling out individual 3-minute sketches from a TV show and creating standalone articles for them. But ... Joe only pawn in Game of Wikipedia. review transgressions/talk to me! " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e2905d1fa03afc2d | What happened to Dreaded Walrus?
What happened to Dreaded Walrus? 112.209.86.65 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e2908f177ccb91a8 | Cultural and historical background of Jesus
Wesley;
Slrubenstein has said he will not further discuss compromise unless others are involved. Would you care to read or comment on Talk:Cultural and historical background of Jesus#Compromise discussion? - 20:17, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e290c1eaf21c86fb | Welcome!
Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Tutorial
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! '''''' Talk | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e29282362f215167 | sup dude
Dear tommy,
I very much do not perceive why you made the irrational decision to unquestioningly remove my constructive input on the plantations central web page. I implore you stop acting like a immature child. I feel quite self-condemnatory for using such unyielding reprehensible language but so be it if you continue this absurdity!
Kristian Nilssen
Agricultural Expert, Harvard University | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e29343448ffcc704 | Many thanks - all now sorted. Cheers - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e2941df731fe4885 | "
Wow, you're hopeless. Lets start with the trifles; you spelled ""necessarily"" wrong. That doesn't give you much credibility. The answer to your first question is no, whites from Liverpool speak Scouse, and they don't speak the same as whites from South London, of course, but I don't see what that has to do with White South African English. However, the answer to your second question is mostly yes. Most blacks from Boston do sound pretty much the same as blacks from New Orleans. Most blacks from both areas speak what's called African American Vernacular English (of you're into political correctness, which you seem to be), which is an ethnolect and a sociolect that is becoming more and more different from the speech of whites in America. I'm not exactly sure what you mean by ""Mother Tongue English speakers"". Do you mean L1 varieties?
I don't think my final statement is a violation of WP:OWN because I never said I own this article, nor did I ever think that. I simply temporarily ""took it over"", if you will, to make it a better description of White South African English. Those just happened to be the words I decided to use. It says at the top of this article that the article was in need of attention by an expert on this subject, and while I am no expert, I certainly seem to be the closest thing to it that this article has ever seen (with the notable exception of JackLumber). I think you knew what I meant by that expression, but it's certainly possible that you didn't.
Finally, I will respond to your earlier comment that ""White South African English"" as a title for this article is ""simply racist"". You really haven't explained to me how that would be a racist title. I'm going to assume that you meant either: 1.) That title would suggest that only whites in South Africa speak English and absolutely no one else does. 2.) That title would suggest that whites are the most important group in South Africa, they're are better than everyone else, and they are thus the only group in South Africa deserving an article on the type of English they speak. Both of these choices seem rather absurd to me. If you thought 1.), then I already proposed a solution for that. We could give each Indian South African English, Black South African English, and White South African English its own article to show that there are indeed other dialects of English spoken in South Africa besides WSAfE. If you thought 2.), then you are racist. Let me explain. For that title to be racist I would have to be white. If I were a racist white person I would want that to be the title of the article to show that whites are better and that the way they speak is better. Since we are both anonymous, however, there is no way you could possibly know my race. You would have to rely on conjecture. In this case, your guess was that I was white. After all, if I were black and I proposed that, I would have to somehow be racist against myself. What I don't understand for sure is why you assumed I was white. That's quite a racist assumption. Anyone in the world can edit Wikipedia; people from all races. Yet you assumed I was white. Unless you had statistics to back that assumption up, which you didn't, then that's ""simply racist"". Even if you did have statistics to back it up, it still could be racist. To me, what you're saying is that only white people edit Wikipedia, and that people of other races aren't intelligent enough. Of course, I don't for sure, but that's my conjecture. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e296842510ed1db9 | See graphe paranomon. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e2972f5823a09041 | Get a psychatrist, moron.
You 9/11 truthers make me sick. paranoid schizophrenics like yourself shouldn't be allowed to use a computer. I'd suggest that you stop lying on your userpage that your are in MENSA - clearly your not. Only retards think 9/11 was an inside job. Oh and take a bath. It's been months since you last took one. | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
e297d4a664b63347 | "
Misdirected Debate
The threads on this entry have gotten misdirected in a zealous comparison with MPT, which is interesting but not especially relevant. Perhaps the word ""Portfolio"" has become a flash point, but I see only limited value in that line of discussion. It's a footnote and only loosely related to the issues addressed by PPM. I agree with Nickmalik that a more practical definition would be useful.
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e297dd3d3e70c9e9 | Fuck u bitch
Fuck u Bitch | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
e29a3ba2fdc31fa0 | Blaxthos has been pushing his POV into this article on Bill O'Reilly and also Foxnews.24.27.130.12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e2a1e1239a5d1d55 | First of all, the user shouldn't have came to me on a verbal aggressive way and could of said it the alternate way, which he failed to do so, and I responded back at his comments and gave him a fair warning if he tries to f*** with me again. I'll bet he won't like it and back away from it.
Anyways, regarding about the 2000 New Flyer C40HF buses (5000-5222) they were at divisions 3, 5, 7 and 18. Although, a few of them were at SGV-3 division, when they were brand new and entering into service in the early 2000s, before being sent to divisions SB-5 and WSC-7. If you haven't noticed, a few of their cousins C40LF buses were at the same division they were, since one 5300 series bus was on line 180 in the early 2000s, when it was brand new. So, it wasn't the C40HFs that were at D3, their cousins were, too.
Yeah, SB-5 division did have a few of the New Flyer D40LF buses (3000-3019) at one time, before they were sent to WSC-6 for almost their whole life, before 3 or 4 units were sent to Veolia Transportation (a bus contractor) in 2009 or 2010. I remembered riding one of those D40LF buses on line 115, when SB-5 used to operate that line, shared by SB-18, which currently owns the line.
Btw, thanks for sending me a message in a civilized matter. After all, me and you have had verbal altercations in the beginning over bus stuff and changes. But it's all cool now, right? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e2a92a6bf729cbb1 | "
I thought that his name was ""Brutus"", but Popeye said ""Bluto"" because Popeye ahd a speech impediment.....John Stewart Miller" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e2afa0310edcbb3e | Well fellow wikipedians, a lot of good images (opinion) are getting flushed down to toilet these days. Is it really making wikipedia a better, or more legal place? Not in my eyes, but I am now starting to remove all my sculpture images (several hundred?) because I'd rather do it myself than have someone else do it. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e2b0a6b8ccebfc3d | "
Now you do the same with me as for Anitta/Anittas. It's Bonaparte. Not Bonapart. I'm glad that you have romanian friends. As far as it is internationally recognized as a Romanian poet, fact that is also in Moldova recognized as a Romanian poet I have the opinion to let Romanian poet. Let it like this, in this way it's affirmed one more time the strong relationship between Romania and Moldova. I see no problem to state like this. I read today that the majority of people from Moldova wants to join EU. talk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e2be034d6c2ea5d7 | "'German state of Schleswig-Holstein where wooded arrow shafts and clubs have been excavated.' TYPO= I think you meant ""wooden"" not ""wooded""" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e2bfcdd0fbae71fd | Oppose. It's better to maintain consistency by following WP:RUS. The arguments presented are not good enough to warrant application of WP:IAR. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e2c3ea049c51e257 | The topic under discussion on the article is in fact the holocaust, so bringing up the holocaust was not some attempt at godwining the conversation, it was directly on point to the content dispute that is ongoing. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e2c684cf7ff147b8 | You are a stupid *******==
You accuse me of sock puppetry.
Then u send me a link to the page to defend myself (unless that was autmatic)
and then i added stuff to defend myself.
And then somone (maybe the 50 different accoutns you have, or your *** friends deleted it)
so now you wont even let me defend myself. You stupid ******
I dont care if i get banned for this. just because i reverted your edits, you do this.
== | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
e2cc6e3cb9120661 | References
It makes little sense to have a list of references on a page without text. Perhaps someone might like to sort through these and add them to their respective pages (e.g. French unit, Mesopotamian weights and measures). 21Sep05
Renfrew, Colin and Bahn, Paul
George Bass
William H McNeil and Jean W Sedlar,
Andrew George,
James B. Pritchard,
Shaika Haya Ali Al Khalifa and Michael Rice,
Dr. Muhammed Abdul Nayeem,
Marie-Loise Thomsen,
Michael Roaf
Chang
Nicholas Awde and Putros Samano
Gardiner
Antonio Loprieno
Michael Rice
Gillings
Somers Clarke and R. Englebach
J. P. Mallory
Nelson Glueck
Anne H. Groton
Hines
Vitruvius
Claudias Ptolemy
Herodotus
Silvia Luraghi
Michael Grant
Alex Patterson
Lucas N. H. Bunt, Phillip S.Jones, Jack D. Bedient
H Arthur Klein
R. A. Cordingley
Jean Gimpel
Lionel Casson
Francis H. Moffitt{{Section:Book reference after author|Year=1987|Title=Surveying|Publisher=H | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e2d042fc0f41699d | The above is not a template, it is a subst of a template. The original version linked to her comment directly. There is no intent to demean or to parody Kelly. I was in the process of debating her actions, and the actions of those who support her. I feel that so long as there is a template of support for her, there should be a template that holds the opposing viewpoint. You may take note that the template never appeared on my user page. Please do lift the block, and my apologies to Kelly if this template is offensive to her. Frankly, I am somewhat amused that this would provide an excuse to block my account. I posted the example here in order to provide some small amount of context for others to understand the situation. My concern is with fairness. Please assume good faith - I found this amusing, and I am sure that there are others who feel the same. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e2d33768a4260bce | who knows maybe i might get to talk after that. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e2d6ad1452cfccd8 | .Forsite Forsyth Boresyth.Forsyth sucks | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
e2d73dc0ad0d89ce | "the edit I made clearly said ""in the novels..."" etc. so whay are you so pissed off at me citing the novels themselves.
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e2e622bd7ae102d8 | "
It is a title of a song: In And Out Of Love.""" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e2eb19b8ec5157b3 | You must have a VERY small penis. 207.237.233.142 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e2eb4e76cce2c231 | – Whatever it is that you are trying to say, TBNL, seems disconcerting and threatening. It is also rather incoherent. Would you mind restating what it is you want to say here with more clarity? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e2f0f777d2e76c0c | "
My post below should answer your first point. If there are no standards for criticism to be included, we would just have an endless tirade of insults and name-calling in every article. And Nixon is mentioned in the Washington Post article as a milestone in time (as in ""Beginning with Nixon's administration)In any case, the WP article's criticism section is far better in that it mentions specific events that originate criticism, and not just the opinion stemming from those events. That's my whole problem with the criticism section of this article. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e2f6fc05f4c636ed | Please stop
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e3007736e5f55c21 | I've gone ahead and implemented the revisions to the lede section discussed above. Please feel free to comment here or on my talk page if there is any additional feedback. Thanks! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e303e94797f59ff7 | Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. Vagina. | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e30f4ea276a4d752 | I think the best way to move foward is accept we both made mistakes, shake hands and move on. But if you don't think we can be adult enough for that by all means continue to fight and look childish. PS that's not an insult either. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e31185559b22b038 | "Well, since tony, the tiger...i mean marine seems to be waffling and going back on his report of NYC being confirmed to him, a friend or maybe his mother (who really knows, he seems to be self-serving and desirious of chnaging facts, rules, policies, et al in order to gain favor from future voters for gov of PR, when he runs). He certainly has shown his true colors and how he ever became an administrator surely puts wiki at the forefront of the pandering and self serving purposes displayed her. I think I know a way that those who support puerta rico as his pob, tony should ask his ""friend the cop"" in florida to write an internet article about baez and include in it a reference to the tmz (and other bogus references) and the report that baez' office personnel lied and that baez was indeed born in puerta rico. Then they would have support of a confirmed, verifiable and believable source to cite in place of the nationally televised television interview given by BW. Subsequently, the puerta rican loving dirtbags can invalidate any consensus and ignore ever one that is in search of the truth. This entry has been archived and we shall see, if this page remains or disappears from any view. Have a nice day.
98.64.75.179
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e3121f9472050eae | Mass removal of language articles by Ryulong
Сайн байна уу? As you saw, I have trouble with a guy who thinks content with reliable sources can be removed without clarifying why they should be. I appreciate if you share your opinion with us at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Languages#Mass deletion of language articles by Ryulong. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e3132430be2b9082 | As I said, be specific about your PoV concerns Cool Cat, or do not add these tags. I also suggest that you stop harassasing me. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e313ef78b13d84f5 | "=RE: my user name=
Is there a rule against having too long a username?
I mean I know it doesn't necessarily look ""tidy"" but surely there are no other problems than that?
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e3172c0b1e27a79b | "
Where would you suggest adding it? I haven't seen any source that traces its use. I may have read that it appeared on posters in 1972, but I'd have to find who said that - perhaps Collier. The documentary about the Millennium festival used it as the title. In proposal3 I'd dropped mention of it from the festival paragraph. The documentary might be better placed in the ""media"" section. ·:· ·:· " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e3177c92e106356b | Potential copyright violation
You haven't noted where this text came from: . | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e3180d7d099d80d5 | Béla IV of Hungary
Your energy is fascinating. I have to speed up. ) Thank you very much for your review. Have a nice month! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e319c280d7c10708 | ESPN are better enough for you? Look there and see bitch
I did fucking good thing for Wikipedia and that's what i get.... Asshole | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
e31a6f3e8bfee65d | Please do not use multiple account to edit wikipedia it is against the policy
Please do not use multiple account to edit wikipedia it is against the policy. You will get blocked! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e31c127bb93337e6 | Logos
There is a discussion to clarify our policy/guideline on the use of sports team logos. Please see Wikipedia_talk:Logos#Clarification_on_use_of_sports_team_logos if you wish to participate in the discussion. \talk | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e31dbce7188e0417 | FPs
I've just did a review of most of the categories, reshuffling the images a bit to add a couple new ones (We should hopefully stop getting theatrical and literary images everywhere now that we have individual categories for them!), and re-evaluating things to fix silliness. I believe you have a tool to check whether all things labelled as FP are in the FP pages. Can you run it?
I have used all care, but it doesn't hurt to play it safe. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e31f8d03f0fd4715 | "
Your dead right mate this was brought to admin attention yet the attacks continued see his last post on ani yet I loose the head and my old friend appears to block great work Deacon. Talk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e3267f2c496522d5 | I deleted the following statement from the article because it is absurd:
The more shows that a cow or bull attends and wins, the more desirable their genetic makeup will become. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e32b70b61d346675 | A little clique controls the Technocracy articles to very very bad effect
The same group of scum bag tandem editors that have controlled and now want to misrepresent any and all articles connected with Technocracy issues ... even to the point of trying to delete the article now.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Johnfos#The_Signpost:_17_October_2011
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Epipelagic
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Beagel
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Lawrencekhoo
Mostly they collude to give bad information.
TAB
The same group of tandem editors from several years ago still try and control this article. They want to eliminate an article about one of the major social movements ... the group that started it.
Wikipedia is known for special interest control and buddy editing. Its a pity and the reason a serious article on an important American group is being tried to be done away with by tandem editors that obviously object for some reason to the content. The past clearly shows the same team of tandem editors here.
Beagle and Johnphos are tandem editors as is Lawrencekhoo and Epipelagic... One of the most significant groups in American history and they want to get rid of the article. Its pathetic and shows the weakness of en. Wikipedia. Lawrencekhoo is a mainstream economist who ax grinds economic articles Google his name for his economic 'beliefs' Gino Your right about the tandem editors on the Technocracy article | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e331a9e39025da9e | Before anyone considers deleting this page, please look for information on him, as you will notice he has competed for Shooto and Sengoku, both major tier promotions in MMA and he competes for BAMMA, plus he is a multi time BJJ world champion, which means that deleting this page would be a complete blunder for anyone who decides to do so. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e339c914dbe20011 | We shall defend our island, whatever the cost may be, we shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender. Neither will i until these two great pages are merged as one
The one and only | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e33c8e6a6227bccb | "
)
Welcome back to regular editing. I saw your stamp about a week ago, but didn't leave a note. I have many time constraints these day.
Keep up the good work, and glad to see you (relatively) back. talk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e34bfa651790b513 | Here we go again! Liberal Bias! reverted in less than 3 minutes again! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e34f15619c2d2ad6 | Cyrillic
Hey. I just looked at the Cyrillic transliteration for the Chinese. Besides I don't see the point of having the Chinese in Cyrillic, the letter ц has ts sound. It is currently listed as a z, despite the fact something like a 3 has that sound. Is this correct? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e35093b032dc81b6 | Early Life
Maria Kristine Pangan Francisco( born November 27 1983) in Pandacan Metro Manila Philippines. Father Domingo Francisco Seaman Adventure of the Seas. while her Mother Virginia Francisco was PoliceWoman 2nd Leuteinant of WAC Philippines. She had 5 sisters Krizette, krisviminda,Krissandy,Krizdominique,Krizvinia and one brother Macauley Krismond.
Kristine took voice lesson and martial arts classes when she was a child. She went to Catholic Womans League Infants school, and on primary Quiapo Parochial School (4years) and Jacinto Zamora Elementary School she graduated . Kristine later attended secondary Mary Help of Christians Montessori Dasmarinas Cavite and graduated followed by De La Salle University-Dasmarinas
Career
Whilst in her teens and before she was in the public eye, she became involved with Beauty Contest when she joined Mutya ng Dasmarinas 2000 and won special awards Ms. Photogenic , Best in Casual Wear. where she change her image as a matured one and started being fahionable She was a Print ad model of Quinta Classe and also joined stage play in Dasmarinas Academy as attorney role entitled Ang Paglilitis ni Mang Serapio. and she played also as Maria Clara in EL FILIBUSTERISMOshe won Best actress on the Stage Play. she joined Calendar Girl on tv noon time show
and after 5 years she got back to again to Modelling field. she and her sisters was on philippine tv series Kampanerang Kuba ,Panday ,DaDedidodu,'Your song' and some Tv commercialsPersonal LifeAfter being married last 2003 she gave birth a bouncing baby girl named Kaite Summer Lustestica''' (June 14 2004) at 12:58 am at Korea-Philippine Friendship Hospital. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e3541eab12bff230 | "==LacusCurtius==
I'm sorry you're having trouble with the LacusCurtius site, but the links we have don't meet the definition of ""dead links"": see WP:Link rot. These are still the correct links; the site hasn't ceased to exist or changed its address; and people can still reach the site through these links. There's no such thing as a link that's dead to some users and not others. The page loads slower for me than any other site I use regularly, so whatever causes that may be the source of your difficulty as well. But the page is located at the given address, and the link is still active, so it isn't a ""dead link"". " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e35515f42fe3bc1b | I have given my reasons why I find that evidence insufficient. You argue that the primary source is Langan himself. OK, I would like to hear the arguments based on statements from this primary source that he is an advocate of ID. Because I don't believe he is one, based on the evidence I have seen. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e355c9d79beed473 | Huggle
Just so you know, with this revert, you reverted one edit to another vandalised edit. Regards, | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e35a7113f717a51b | Is this something that is even relavent to my point? To be honest with you, I have no interest in further criticizing Ping Fu. All the major facts are now clear and she has admitted she was wrong. The only thing left for her to do is to take responsibility. I have been fair all the way through on the discussions. You on the other hand has been biased, and you can't deny that. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e35dea9c497172d8 | The pelican picture is better at conveying the simple idea of what is happening. A photo of the gushing oil underwater, if one was available in HD would be best. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e35f89d00681fca0 | )
Quebec Autoroute 50 is just as weird, it's numbered from somewhere near Pembroke, Ontario even though there's currently not a chance in Hull of it being extended that far. (talk | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e3609a48fd2e6ec4 | "
WT:Merging#Confusing instructions: ""How to merge"" - and ""Is this a record?"", responded to P64 and PamD" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e3617c7bc2f7f905 | "
a few suggestions on ""Measuring economic worth over time""
I fully realize that this is a work in progress but thought a few suggestions could be useful. I'll post some specific ones on the talk page but more generally:
Please don't take it the wrong way but I think quite often your writing style reflects academia too much - as if you were writing for an academic journal. However the intended target audience of the Wikipedia is different than that of a bunch of academics so care should be taken to avoid unnecessary nomenclature and jargon, as well as to avoid ""academic phrasing"" in favor of simple formulations. More importantly I think one should be careful with introducing terms and concepts into the text that have not been defined previously and that a lay reader may be unfamiliar with, for example ""social cost"" or ""social production"".
Speaking of ""social production"" it'd be useful to standardize the terminology when it is being used. For example it seems like by ""proportions of social production"" you refer to income shares of various classes (workers, capitalists, landlords etc) - if so, then that should be stated clearly, if not, the difference should be clarified. Likewise comparing the article title and the lead I think you're equivocating between ""economic worth"" and ""social worth"" which could be/are distinct concepts. Also because I'm probably coming at this from a different background I'm wondering what exactly is the relationship between ""social product"" and more standard measures of production like GDP, income, etc.
""Both contemporary and historical wage price series are inherently controversial, as they speak to the standard of living of working class people."" - I'm not sure if contemporary wage and price series are really ""inherently"" controversial in the sense of being outright rejected by many researchers; at least that doesn't seem like the appropriate word here. Likewise, I don't think the reason why they are controversial/deemed important is because they concern ""working class people"". They obviously concern all members of society whatever their class status. In a similar way the idea of ""economic worth"" can refer to entities such as firms, charities, nations or even physical objects such as machinery and equipment.
Proportion of gdp and the questions given as examples aren't really related. For example the question ""what was the opportunity cost of a £50,000 investment in 1840?"" is not obviously or directly related to the question ""what was the social power of capital in 1840?"".
Some ideas for expansion: ""Theoretical problems"" sections should link and perhaps briefly mention things like the LTV and marginalism, maybe something like the aggregation problem (though that article needs some serious work). ""Wage price series"" can be expanded to include discussion of how these kind of data are generally collected (btw, I'm not sure what a ""real price"" is here. An individual good price divided by a price index?). For historical wage price series there's also a good bit of data available for the Netherlands and to a lesser extent France and Germany. There's also sporadic data for a wide number of different societies which don't really constitute a series but do provide ""snapshot"" views of the economy/society in time (all the way back to ancient Sumer). The main difficulty of comparing aggregates across time is the changing nature of a consumption basket and time usage, in particular introduction of new goods and disappearance of old ones (like Malleus alludes to above) - this should also be elaborated upon and made more explicit.
I'd really hate to barge in and edit a new article while it is still being written so I thought bringing up some suggestions here would be better. Thanks. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e3682108dcde74f0 | ":::::::::The Talk page guidelines state -
Behavior that is unacceptable
Do not threaten people
Now look at this discourse between us -
Me - ""So my block is specifically and only because of my removal of the WHOIS tag. Please show me where it states in Wikipolicy that I cannot remove this tag. Bear in mind this tag is not a shared IP notice tag.""
You - ""Stop now...and I mean now, or I will have this page protected for the remainder of your block. You have been told repeatedly the rules...you just refuse to understand them because that would make you wrong. You are wrong, you violated policy, you editwarred, you violated WP:3RR, and you were blocked. Now...STOP!""
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e368a3264e71d56e | So many children to abuse - so little time | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e369019bf0276d13 | England v West Indies, 20th March 2009
This story should definitely be mentioned. Either as just a related story, or maybe of one that shows the complicated nature of the method? cricinfo.com | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e36dfc44ffe27e60 | Yes, you were.79.170.93.174 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e36fd259742139d4 | "
Re: IRC
Where in hell did you get that idea from? Honestly, I am not even on that channel's access list, I have autovoice simply because of my Wikipedia cloak. I would recommend poking around #wikimedia-ops for autovoice in #wikipedia-en-help. (Talk••) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e371c0f9e34e083f | Could possibly partially merge with Allophilia... | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e373a9ac72b208f4 | Eat my penis
Yo fuck you whack ass niggas. One. | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
e37565944255d6bc | Contested deletion
This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... (your reason here)
This is all original work. Read it. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e377c3837907d38f | Featured article candidate
... I also don't like the GR citations, but don't know if they are acceptable or not.
Do you know of any U.S. city article that doesn't use general references (2000 U.S. Census Bureau in this case) for their demographics section? Featured articles Boston, Massachusetts and Marshall, Texas even use these. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e378d68d94adf14f | {{subst:uw-vand1}Stereotypes of African Americans}} | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
e3791f09655582e0 | "
Review comments
I took a brief look at the article after the recent peer review was closed. Here are a few comments for improvement - these are things that woulkd be a problem if this were up for WP:FAC or even WP:GAN.
The lead is five paragraphs but WP:LEAD says the limit is four paragraphs.
The lead does not summarize the article well - my rule of thumb is to include every section in the lead somehow, but the Munic Crisis, his marriage and children, his children with other women, and his death are not in the lead
WP:MOSQUOTE says that all direct quotations need to have a reference (even if they are in the lead)
To be free, most historic images need to have been published before 1923 or their source must be given so clearly that it can be determined that the image was published without a copyright notice or its copyright has expired. Images like File:CAL CAM2 DH4 Nov 4 1926.jpg were clearly taken after 1923, and lack the information as to sources that allow any sort of determination of copyright status.
Or how is this image not still under copyright - published in 1927 at the earliest File:CharlesLindbergh-RaymondOrteig.jpg?
The relevant policy for WP:FAIRUSE images is WP:NFCC, every point of which has to be met for an image to be used under fair use guidelines. I often ask myself three questions about fair use images: 1) Does the image increase the reader's understanding of the article's subject? 2) Is the image discussed in the article itself? 3) Is the image used merely for decorative purposes? NFCC requires minimal use - all of which leads to me to ask: How do two separate Fair Use covers of ""WE"" increase the reader's understanding / meet minimal use?
MOS says not to sandwich text between images - this does so in several places.
I read Mosely's biography of Lindbergh years ago (it is cited here) and read WE as a kid. This seems to me to under play Lindbergh's isolationism and at least the perception of him as an appeaser / possible Nazi sympathizer.
The language in the lead at least seems needlessly convoluted - look at what the page Lindbergh says ""Charles Lindbergh (1902–1974), first pilot to fly solo non-stop across the Atlantic"" then look at how it described here ""As a 25-year-old U.S. Air Mail pilot Lindbergh emerged suddenly from virtual obscurity to instantaneous world fame as the result of his Orteig Prize-winning solo non-stop flight on May 20–21, 1927, made from Roosevelt Field[N 1] located in Garden City on New York's Long Island to Le Bourget Field in Paris, France, a distance of nearly 3,600 statute miles (5,800 km), in the single-seat, single-engine purpose built Ryan monoplane Spirit of St. Louis."" The facts are all there, but it is so comvoluted that if you don't already know what Lindy did, you might miss it.
What makes ""Charleslindberg.com a reliable source? See WP:RS
In short, before you worry too much about the language, there is a lot of other stuff to fix here.
Hope this helps, ><>°° " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.